HomeMy WebLinkAboutEIR Appendices........................................................................................................................
APPENDIX A:
NOTICE OF PREPARATION COMMENTS LETTERS
........................................................................................................................
NOP – CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE AND ASSOCIATED REZONING EIR
MARCH 5, 2014 1
NOTICE OF PREPARATION
DATE: Wednesday, March 5, 2014
TO: State Clearinghouse FROM: George Schroeder
State Responsible Agencies Associate Planner
State Trustee Agencies City of Cupertino
Other Public Agencies 10300 Torre Avenue
Interested Organizations Cupertino, CA 95014-3202
SUBJECT: Notice of Preparation (NOP) of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Cupertino
General Plan Amendment, Housing Element Update, and associated Rezoning Project
LEAD AGENCY/SPONSOR: City of Cupertino Planning Division
PROJECT TITLE: Cupertino General Plan Amendment, Housing Element Update, and Associated Rezoning
Notice is hereby given that the City of Cupertino will prepare an EIR for the General Plan Amendment, Housing
Element Update and associated Rezoning Project (Project) and will hold a public scoping meeting to receive
comments on the scope of the EIR, as detailed below. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15206, the
Project is considered a project of statewide, regional, or areawide significance. The City of Cupertino, acting as the
Lead Agency, determined that the Project could result in potentially significant environmental impacts and that an
EIR is required.
This NOP has been prepared for the EIR for the proposed Project in compliance with Section 15082 of the
CEQA Guidelines. The City is soliciting comments on the scope and content of the EIR. The City will prepare an
EIR to address the potential environmental impacts associated with the Project at a programmatic level consistent
with CEQA Guidelines Section 15168.
The proposed Project, its location and potential environmental effects are described below.
Members of the public and public agencies are invited to provide comments in writing as to the scope and content
of the EIR. The City needs to know the views of your agency as to the scope and content of the environmental
information that is germane to your agency’s statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed Project.
Your agency will need to use the EIR prepared by the City when considering your permits or other approvals for
the Project.
NOP – CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE AND ASSOCIATED REZONING EIR
MARCH 5, 2014 2
Due to the time limits mandated by State law, your response must be sent at the earliest possible date, but no later
than the close of the 30-day NOP review period at 5:00 p.m. on Monday, April 7, 2014. If you submit comments
on the scope of the EIR, you will automatically be added to the City’s distribution list for future notices and
information about the environmental review process for Project. If you do not wish to submit comments on the
scope of the EIR, but would like to be added to the City’s mailing list, you can submit your contact information,
including email address with a request to be added to the mailing list.
Please send your comments or you request to be added to the City’s mailing list to George Schroeder, Associate
Planner, at the address shown above or email to GeorgeS@cupertino.org with “Cupertino General Plan
Amendment, Housing Element Update, and Associated Rezoning” as the subject. Please include the name of a
contact person for your agency.
A Scoping Meeting will be held on Tuesday, March 11, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. at the Cupertino Community Hall (10350
Torre Avenue, next to the library).
A copy of this Notice of Preparation and Notice of Public Scoping Meeting is also available online at
www.cupertinogpa.org.
Name: George Schroeder, Associate Planner Signature:________________________________
NOP – CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE AND ASSOCIATED REZONING EIR
MARCH 5, 2014 3
PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
This section describes the location and provides a summary of the proposed Project.
PROJECT LOCATION
As shown on Figure 1, Cupertino is located on the southern portion of the San Francisco Peninsula in Santa Clara
County. The city is generally bounded by the cities of Los Altos and Sunnyvale to the north, Santa Clara and San
Jose to the east, Saratoga to the south, and unincorporated Santa Clara County to the west and southwest. The city
is accessed by California State Route 85 (SR 85) and Interstate 280 (I-280).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Cupertino is currently undertaking a community-based planning process to review land use
alternatives as part of a focused General Plan Amendment. Proposed alternatives include options for City-wide
development allocations (office, commercial, hotel and residential), as well as building heights and densities for
major mixed-use corridors including city gateways/sub-areas/nodes (Figure 2), special centers (Figure 3), and
seven study areas (Figure 4). The primary purpose of the proposed General Plan Amendment is to replenish, re-
allocate, and increase citywide office, commercial, hotel, and residential allocations in order to plan for anticipated
future development activity while keeping with the community’s character, goals, and objectives. The secondary
purpose of the General Plan Amendment is to consolidate development requests by several property owners for
amendments to the General Plan by reviewing seven study areas. The potential land use alternatives and changes to
urban design and mobility policies would require amendments to the current City of Cupertino General Plan
(2000-2020) adopted by the City Council on November 15, 2005.
The City is also updating its Housing Element to accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA)
for the 2014-2022 planning period and meet its fair share housing obligations of 1,064 units, and amending
Chapter 19.56 (Density Bonus) of the City’s Municipal Code to be consistent with the current Housing Element
Program 12 (Density Bonus Program). Refer to Figure 5 for the potential Housing Element sites.
The project may also include changes to the City’s zoning map to improve consistency with the General Plan to
incorporate changes to Housing Element policies as required by State Law or as adopted by the City Council.
Consistent with Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines, a program-level EIR will be prepared to analyze the
potential impacts of the General Plan Amendment, Housing Element Update, and associated Rezoning. The seven
study areas and Housing Element sites will be studied at site-level for overall development envelope and traffic
generated. However, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c), the EIR will not evaluate the impacts of
specific, individual developments that may be allowed under the proposed General Plan and any such subsequent
projects will be required to be examined in the light of the program-level EIR to determine whether an additional
environmental document may need to be prepared. Such subsequent environmental review could result in a
Negative Declaration, a Mitigated Negative Declaration or a Subsequent EIR.
NOP – CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE AND ASSOCIATED REZONING EIR
MARCH 5, 2014 4
PUBLIC AGENCY APPROVALS
The proposed Project will require adoption by the Cupertino City Council. The Planning Commission and other
decision-making bodies will review the proposed Project and make recommendations to City Council. While other
agencies may be consulted during the General Plan amendment process, their approval is not required for Project
adoption. However, subsequent development under the General Plan Amendment, Housing Element Update, and
associated Rezoning may require approval of local, regional, State, or federal agencies that may rely on the
programmatic EIR for decisions in their areas of expertise.
PROBABLE ENVIRONMENTAL EFECTS OF THE PROJECT
The proposed Project could potentially affect the following environmental factors and each will be addressed in
the EIR:
Aesthetics
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology/Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Hydrology/Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Noise
Population and Housing
Public Services
Parks and Recreation
Transportation and Traffic
Utilities and Service Systems
The following topics are likely to be associated with less-than-significant impacts and are not expected to be
evaluated in detail in the EIR:
Agriculture and Forestry Resources Mineral Resources
ATTACHMENTS:
Figure 1: Regional and Vicinity Map
Figure 2: Major Mixed-Use Corridors and City Gateways/Sub-Areas/Nodes
Figure 3: Cupertino Special Centers
Figure 4: Study Area Locations
Figure 5: Potential Housing Element sites
280
280
880
680
85
85
237
17
87
101
PaloAlto
Fremont
SanJose
SantaClara
Sunnyvale
Mountain
View
LosAltos
LosAltos
Hills
Milpitas
Campbell
Los
Gatos
Saratoga
SANMATEO
COUNTY
ALAMEDA
COUNTY
SANTA
CLARA
COUNTY
SANTA
CRUZ
COUNTY
Cupertino
Oakland
Berkeley
Palo
Alto
Fremont
SanJose
Santa
Clara
Sunny-
vale
Mt.
View
Los
Altos
Menlo
Park
Milpitas
Hayward
Dublin
Redwood
City
SanMateo
Daly
City
Union
City
Campbell
Los
Gatos
Saratoga
ALAMEDA
COUNTY
CITY&
COUNTY
OF
SAN
FRANCISCO
SANMATEO
COUNTY
SANTA
CLARA
COUNTY
CONTRACOSTACOUNTY
MARIN
COUNTY
SANTACRUZ
COUNTY
San
Francisco
Bay
Pacific
Ocean
Cupertino
00.5 12345Miles
Legend
CityBoundary
UrbanServiceAreaBoundary
UnincorporatedAreasWithin
BoundaryAgreementLine
2-2 Land Use/Community Design
City of Cupertino General Plan
Figure2-A. Cupertino Regional Location
Regional Location NOTICE OF PREPARATION
THE PLANNING CENTER | DC&E
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE AND ASSOCIATED REZONING PROJECT
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Figure 1
Regional and Vicinity Map
Source: City of Cupertino General Plan, 2000-2020.
31GENERAL PLAN A MENDMENT CONC EPT AL TERNA TIVES REPORT
SECTION III | CONCE PT AL TERNATI VES
Lehigh PermanenteQuarry and LehighHanson Cement Plant CityHall
De AnzaCollege
Apple Campus 2280
85
280
280
85
85
85CUPERTINO
SUNNYVALE
SARATOGA
WEST
VALLEY
SANTA CLARA
··········
100,000 s.f.
200 rooms
200 units
·
··
STEVENS CREEK BLVD
WO
L
F
E
R
D
DV
L
B
A
Z
N
A
E
D
DV
L
B
A
Z
N
A
E
D
HOMESTEAD RD
North Crossroads Sub Area
City Center Node
South Vallco Gateway East
North Vallco Gateway
North De Anza Gateway
South Vallco Gateway West
Stelling Gateway
Stevens Creek and 85 Gateway
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
08001600 2400 Feet
Legend
City Boundary
BRT Stop
BRT Line
Key Intersections
Alternative C
* Additional height allowances w/ retail
and project-wide benefits
Homestead Corridor
North Wolfe Corridor
Heart of the City Corridor
North De Anza Corridor
South De Anza Corridor
SOURCE: MIG, INC. 2014
THE PLANNING CENTER | DC&E
0
Scale (Feet)
2,400
Figure 2
Major Mixed-Use Corridors and City Gateways/Sub-Areas/Nodes
NOTICE OF PREPARATION
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE AND ASSOCIATED REZONING PROJECT
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Oak Valley
MonteVista
BubbRoad
3.8.7.
2.
1.6.
5.
4.
Fairgrove
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE, AND ASSOCIATED REZONING PROJECT
CITY OF CUPERTINONOTICE OF PREPARATION
0 0.5 1
Scale (Miles)
PLACEWORKS
SOURCE: U.S. CENSUS, 2010; ESRI, 2014; PLACEWORKS, 2014.
Cupertino Special Centers
Figure 3
1. West side of Stevens Canyon and McClellan
2. Foothill and Stevens Creek
3. Homestead near Foothill
4. NW Corner of Bollinger and Blaney
5. SE Corner Homestead and Blaney
6. 7-11 sites at McClellan and Stelling
7. Homestead near Homestead High
8. 76 Station at Homestead and Highway 85
CUPERTINO SANTACLARA
SUNNYVALE
SARATOGA
Other Neighborhoods
Other Commercial Centers
III-3
Overview
Study Area
BoundaryStudy Area
Study Areas
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE AND ASSOCIATED REZONING PROJECT
CITY OF CUPERTINO
THE PLANNING CENTER | DC&E
NOTICE OF PREPARATION
Source: City of Cupertino.
Figure 4
Study Area Locations
0
Scale (Feet)
2,400
NOTICE OF PREPARATION
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE AND ASSOCIATED REZONING PROJECT
CITY OF CUPERTINO
SOURCE: MIG, INC. 2013; SOURCE: CITY OF CUPERTINO GIS, 2014
REVISED: 02/25/14
FIGURE 5
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Ae
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
s
Ag
r
i
c
u
l
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
F
o
r
e
s
t
r
y
Ai
r
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
Bi
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Cu
l
t
u
r
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Ge
o
l
o
g
y
/
S
o
i
l
s
Gr
e
e
n
h
o
u
s
e
G
a
s
E
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
Ha
z
a
r
d
s
/
H
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
Hy
d
r
o
l
o
g
y
/
W
a
t
e
r
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
La
n
d
U
s
e
a
n
d
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Mi
n
e
r
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
No
i
s
e
Po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
/
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
Pu
b
l
i
c
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
/
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
Ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
/
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
Ot
h
e
r
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
t
o
b
e
N
o
t
i
f
i
e
d
Summary of Comments
X
Refers to Public Utilities Commission jurisdiction over the
safety of highway-rail crossings. Suggests adding language
to GP regarding planning future development with the
safety of the rail corridor in mind, including pedestrian
circulation patterns, and compliance with the American
with Disabilities Act.
X
Draft Environmental Impact Report should identify
potential impacts to Lawrence and Foothills Expressways.
See Comprehensive County Expressway Planning Study -
2008 Update for a list of mitigation measures for sig.
impacts to the expressways. The Transportation Impact
Analysis (TIA) should identify additional mitigation if
needed. TIA should follow latest adopted Congestion
Management Program TIA Guidelines.
X
Cal Water's 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP)
used growth projections consistent with historically slow
growth; however, the General Plan Amendment seems to
depict potentially significant growth not considered under
the 2010 UWMP. Suggests that Cal Water and the Santa
Clara Valley Water District should be involved. No Water
Supply Assessment required.
X
State Route 85 and Interstate 280 could have sig.
cumulative impacts. As Cupertino is the Lead Agency, the
City should be clearly identified as responsible for
mitigation measures. Suggests locating housing near mass
transit centers to reduce vehicle trips. Identify traffic
impact fees to be used for project mitigation. Any work
would require encroachment permit on the State Right-of-
Way.
X
VTA supports increased densities in areas along Stevens
Creek Blvd. DEIR should address potential delays to bus
times as a result of increased vehicular traffic. There could
be potential impacts to CMP intersections. City should
establish TDM/Trip Reduction measures.
Private Individuals and Organizations
X
Concerned with the programmatic approach of the
document and should include detailed analysis of
potential impacts to the Vallco Shopping Center.
Consider more alternatives.
X General concern for traffic and congestion.
X X
Concerned with traffic in the Vallco area and building
heights.
Comments Received at Public Meetings
X X X X X X
Concern with water, power, traffic, schools, noise and
housing.
X X X
Traffic and water supply issues. Suggests Alternative C
should be dropped and development should be between
Alternative A and Alternative B. Some development should
be shifted west to balance out traffic and air quality.
X
Insufficient parking. Traffic simulation should be prepared
to show/identify bottleneck intersections. Should place
mid-size grocery near dense housing to reduce vehicle
trips.
X Thanks for the opportunity to participate in the process.
X X No new development in Cupertino. Concerned with
parking issues and public transportation.
X
Include arterial streets and provide traffic studies on side
streets where housing sites would be developed.
X X X
Need overhaul of Vallco area. Alternative A does not seem
valid because of lack of housing. Alternative B seems okay,
but fears the City will be built out before the Alternative is
reached , and put Cupertino in the same situation as it is
now. Alternative C is preferred.
No Name
No Name
No Name
Mary Nelson
mcnelson_us@yahoo.com
Stuart Chessen
10571 N. Portal Ave
schessen@yahoo.com
Phyllis Dickstein
19999 Stevens Creek Blvd., # 103
dicksteinp@aol.com
Steve Hill
sghill3@yahoo.com
Cathy Walker
Ron Richardson
Cal Water
949 B Street
Los Altos, CA 94024
Erik Alm, AICP
Dept. of Transportation (Caltrans)
111 Grand Avenue
Oakland, CA 94612
Roy Molseed
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
3331 North First Street
San Jose, CA 95134-1927
Ivor Samson
Dentons (Law Firm) on behalf of Sears
Holding Corp.
525 Market Street, 26th Floor
Steve Hill
sghill3@yahoo.com
A. Letters Received during the NOP 30-day Review Period from March 5, 2014 to April 7, 2014
Public Agencies/Service Providers
Commenter Name and Address
Ken Chiang, P.E., Utilities Engineer, Public
Utilities Commission
320 West 4th Street, Suite 500
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Dawn S. Cameron
County of Santa Clara Roads and Airports
Dept.
101 Skyport Drive
San Jose, CA 95110-1302
STATE OF CALIFORNIA EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION
320 WEST 4TH STREET, SUITE 500
LOS ANGELES, CA 90013
(213) 576-7083
March 12, 2014
Mr. George Schroeder
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
Dear Mr. Schroeder:
SUBJECT: SCH 2014032007 Cupertino General Plan Amendment - NOP
The California Public Utilities Commission (Commission) has jurisdiction over the safety of
highway-rail crossings (crossings) in California. The California Public Utilities Code requires
Commission approval for the construction or alteration of crossings and grants the
Commission exclusive power on the design, alteration, and closure of crossings in California.
The Commission Rail Crossings Engineering Section (RCES) is in receipt of the Notice of
Preparation (NOP) for the proposed City of Cupertino (City) General Plan Amendment
project.
The project area includes active railroad tracks. RCES recommends that the City add
language to the General Plan so that any future development adjacent to or near the railroad
right-of-way (ROW) is planned with the safety of the rail corridor in mind. New developments
may increase traffic volumes not only on streets and at intersections, but also at at -grade
crossings. This includes considering pedestrian circulation patterns or destinations with
respect to railroad ROW and compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Mitigation
measures to consider include, but are not limited to, the planning for grade separations for
major thoroughfares, improvements to existing at-grade crossings due to increase in traffic
volumes, and continuous vandal resistant fencing or other appropriate barriers to limit the
access of trespassers onto the railroad ROW.
If you have any questions in this matter, please contact me at (213) 576-7076,
ykc@cpuc.ca.gov.
Sincerely,
Ken Chiang, P.E.
Utilities Engineer
Rail Crossings Engineering Section
Safety and Enforcement Division
C: State Clearinghouse
From: Richardson, Ronald [mailto:rrichardson@calwater.com]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 1:51 PM
To: George Schroeder
Cc: He, Ting
Subject: RE: City of Cupertino General Plan Amendment and Housing Element Update 2015 -2023
Upcoming Meetings
George,
Thank you for your patience while we reviewed your request for comment. Below is the response from
Cal Water regarding the GPA and Housing Element Update. If you have any questions, please let Ting
and I know. Thank you.
Cal Water’s approved 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) used growth projections
that were consistent with the historically slow growth within our service area of 0.172% per year,
which results in the addition of 546 services during the 30 year planning period, or about 18
services per year. The City of Cupertino General Plan Amendment and Housing Element Update
appears to have significant growth within the City of Cupertino of a level that was not being
considered in the 2010 UWMP. Cal Water will consider this proposed growth in the next UWMP
update that will take place in 2015. To aid in that effort Cal Water would like to work with the
City of Cupertino’s staff to obtain specific proposed project development quantities and schedules
in order to adjust the growth projection rates.
Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) should also be involved with the supply planning
for this General Plan because they are the wholesale suppliers for the area. The ability of Cal
Water to have sufficient supply to serve the increased demand resulting from the General Plan
Update is in fact contingent upon SCVWD having sufficient supplies in the future to supply this
growth.
This General Plan does not require a water supply assessment to be performed. When a specific
project, that meets SB 610 project definition (e.g. more than 500 dwelling units), is developed
and submitted to the City, the City is required to request Cal Water to perform a water supply
assessment as part of the EIR process for the specific project.
Ron
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <info@cupertinogpa.org>
Date: Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 1:33 PM
Subject: Comment from City of Cupertino General Plan Amendment Website
To: info@cupertinogpa.org
Comment Submitted by:
Name: Steve Hill
Organization: self
Email: sghill3@yahoo.com
Subject:
Traffic intersection bottlenecks
Comment:
name:
Steve Hill
email:
sghill3@yahoo.com
Please be mindful of creating permanent traffic bottlenecks with the
development. In tech terms, bad planning can hard code a bottleneck for
decades.
Exhibit A for this is the Bubb-McClellan bottleneck that negatively
affects thousands of residents every school day. The 1963 article from
the Courier, below, documents awareness of this bottleneck FIFTY years
ago. Half a century of pain and suffering due to poor planning.
A Future Traffic Bottleneck? – McClellan Road 1963
There’s another crucial traffic bottleneck being created in Cupertino
which may put to shame all the other past highway headaches the city has
had to grapple with—and some of them have been and still are real
entanglements.
The new emerging bottleneck is in the rapidly growing Bubb and McClellan
Roads area. Several city officials believe this area is already a
traffic disaster zone.
Last week planning commissioners called the existing road pattern in the
vicinity of Bubb and McClellan Road completely inadequate for even the
present mixture of residential and agricultural uses. And the
commissioners feared that the situation will become more acute as the
area grows. Development is now starting to move and will soon hit the
rapid building stages. This, coupled with the planned opening in 1967 of
the De Anza College in this area, could make the Bubb McClellan sector
one of the worst traffic bottlenecks in the county.
It is expected that the City Council will tackle this problem Monday
night when discussing an application for an apartment complex on 35
acres on McClellan Road, east of the De Anza College site.
In approving this application last week, the commission declared in a
lengthy resolution that the roads in this area were inadequate because:
• Narrow, two-lane paved strips without shoulders serving as Bubb,
McClellan, and Stelling and handling not over 1, 000 cars an hour
eastward and northward.
• Narrow two-lane paved strip without shoulders serving McClellan as
it winds westward to Foothill Boulevard and handling about 300 cars an
hour.
• Narrow, substandard two-lane roads serving as Orange and Byrne
Avenue and running northward from McClellan to Stevens Creek Boulevard
and handling about 400 cars an hour.
The commission also pointed out that major road construction now planned
for the area “provides little or no local service” because:
• The planned Stevens Creek Freeway will provide only a grade
separation at McClellan and Bubb rather than an interchange, which
distinction means that “Said freeway when built will fail miserably in
serving a landlocked area of about 2,000 acres; a land mass which could
easily contain 10,000 families owning more than 15,000 automobiles.
• There are no existing plans to develop the Southern Pacific
right-of-way as a major thoroughfare at ground level grade to serve
local traffic.
Commissioners were also unhappy that jurisdictions have done little to
improve arteries in their territories which would improve local traffic
in the McClellan-Bubb area.
“Cupertino, Sunnyvale, the county, and the state show no progress in
developing a badly needed north-south route along the line of Mary
Avenue and Bubb Road, despite the obvious need for such a direct route
to the junior college site on the Euphrat property,” declared the
commission.
The commissioners noted in approving the proposed apartment development
that the applicant has recognized the need for such a direct route to
the (college) for the area and will cooperate in developing a better
traffic flow, including dedicating land next to the railroad tracks for
a four-lane road which would give the area a little more “traffic
breathing room.”
The commissioners also decided to pursue the situation by bringing it to
the attention of other agencies in hopes that they will study the
problem and cooperate in solving “a knotty problem which is plaguing
all of us alike.”
Agencies and suggestions the commissioners will seek are:
• The Cupertino City Engineer in reference to widening McClellan and
Stelling roads to 90 feet where he feels appropriate within city
boundaries.
• The Department of Public Works, Santa Clara County, with particular
reference for further study of the need for interchanges on the Stevens
Creek Freeway to serve the area in question, and with the hope that by
concerted effort proper representations can be made to the State Highway
division before design is complete and contracts let.
• To trustees of Foothill Junior College particular reference to the
fact that their use will generate a lot of traffic from all sides,
“and that it would not be realistic to ignore very real problems at
their back door, or to argue that someone else would have to surrender
whatever land is required to solve a public need.”
• Also contacted would be the San Jose City Engineer and owners of
undeveloped property on both sides of the railroad track from McClellan
to Homestead, with reference to the fact that their holdings present
comparable difficulties which can perhaps be solved a bit sooner by a
concerted effort at this time.
From:mcnelson_us@yahoo.com
To:George Schroeder
Subject:Cupertino general plan amendment
Date:Tuesday, March 25, 2014 1:49:08 PM
I have read the article in the Cupertino paper.
There are two priority concerns I have:
1- Traffic in the Vallco area. This affects my street and the movement on Stevens Creek, esp. when
Apple and the "rabbit hutches" housing is completed.
2- Possible height building increases. I would oppose this. Don't you think the "rabbit hutches" housing
is high enough? Actually, it is too high.
Mary Nelson
La Mar Drive
Sent from my iPad
........................................................................................................................
APPENDIX B:
COMMUNITY DISCUSSION SUMMARIES
........................................................................................................................
1GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION I | INTRODUCTION
CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
FINAL DRAFT
FEBRUARY 2014
concept alternatives
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION I | INTRODUCTION
2
CONTENTS
I. Introduction................................. 1
Where We Are Today
Project Background
Report Purpose
Project Schedule
II. Vision Framework....................... 7
Defining Our Future
Stakeholder Interviews
Community-wide Workshop #1
Mobility and Design Concepts Input
Draft 2040 Community Vision
Draft 2040 Guiding Principles
Other Project Documents
Concept Alternatives Phase Schedule
III. Concept Alternatives..................17
Identifying Options for the Future
Cupertino’s Regulatory Structure
Factors Influencing Change in Cupertino
Tying Development to Project-Wide Benefits
Concept Alternatives
Economic and Fiscal Performance
Study Area Potential Projects
IV. Next Steps................................. 35
Continuing the Discussion
Stay Involved!
Near-Term Public Meetings and Study Sessions
Sources
Acknowledgments
CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
FINAL DRAFT
FEBRUARY 2014
concept alternatives
I. Introduction
III. Concept Alternatives..................17
Identifying Options for the Future
Cupertino’s Regulatory Structure
Factors Influencing Change in Cupertino
Tying Development to Project-Wide Benefits
Concept Alternatives
Economic and Fiscal Performance
Study Area Potential Projects
IV. Next Steps................................. 35
Continuing the Discussion
Stay Involved!
Near-Term Public Meetings and Study Sessions
Sources
Acknowledgments
CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION I | INTRODUCTION
4
Where We Are TodayCupertino is a great community! The city has wonderful parks
and civic uses, well-established neighborhoods, convenient
access to regional jobs and destinations, successful commer-
cial centers, numerous headquarters for major technology companies,
and boasts one of the best public school systems in the nation.
However, the city faces some significant challenges as it plans for the next
20 to 30 years. Cupertino is facing many regional growth demands. It is
also undergoing a transformation from a traditional suburban residential
community to one that has more public gathering spaces, shopping and
entertainment choices, and jobs within an urban core.
This report summarizes a major step in the General Plan Amendment
process – the presentation and analysis of several Concept Alterna-
tives that have emerged from an extensive community outreach and
participation process. Each of the alternatives identifies a possible future
scenario for Cupertino. The analysis at the end of the report provides spe-
cific detail on the potential benefits and drawbacks of each alternative.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
In the summer of 2012, the City Council directed staff to evaluate ways to
replenish citywide office, commercial and hotel development allocation.
Several recent projects, including Apple Campus 2, utilized a large amount
of development allocation and the remaining pool to draw from was
quite low. The City Council was concerned that new projects, which would
benefit retail sales and employment growth in the city, would not have
available development allocation necessary to move forward through the
planning process.
During this time the City was approached by several property owners,
including some owners within the Vallco Shopping District, about potential
General Plan amendments on their specific properties. In order to com-
prehensively evaluate citywide needs and individual sites, the City Council
decided in early 2013 to combine these individual efforts into one compre-
hensive General Plan Amendment.
In addition, in early 2014 the City initiated a process to update the
State-mandated Housing Element of the General Plan. The Housing
Element, which is a required component of the General Plan, identifies
appropriate locations and policies for future housing in Cupertino. The
City Council decided to combine the housing discussion with the General
Plan Amendment process so the City and community could fully evaluate
mobility, urban design, economic development and housing options in one
comprehensive process.
The General Plan Amendment process involves extensive community
discussions and input provided during public meetings, workshops and
hearings through online comment forms and surveys. While the project
considers citywide land use, urban design, mobility and economic devel-
opment choices, it is not a complete rewrite of the City’s 2005 General
Plan. The current General Plan contains many goals, policies, standards
and programs that the City and community would like to continue into the
future. The amendment project instead is focused on identifying and ana-
lyzing potential changes along the major mixed-use corridors in Cupertino,
which includes Homestead Road, Wolfe Road, De Anza Boulevard and
Stevens Creek Boulevard. These four corridors comprise the areas within
Cupertino that have the greatest ability to change in the near future.
Outdoor events and Farmers Markets provide opportunities for the Cupertino
community to shop and interact
Memorial Park provides a wealth of outdoor recreation and open space for the
community, including grassy areas, an amphitheater, a lighted softball field and
six lighted tennis courts
Click here to view Frequently Asked Questions about the projecti
5GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION I | INTRODUCTION
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
PROJECT GOALS
To help focus the General Plan Amendment process, the City estab-
lished several important project goals:
Goal 1: Involve the community in a comprehensive discussion on
mobility, urban design, economic development and housing chal-
lenges facing Cupertino.
Goal 2: Identify and analyze potential increases to commercial,
office, residential and hotel development allocations within existing
major mixed-use corridors.
Goal 3: Enhance and improve the overall retail commercial ex-
perience in Cupertino by retaining existing business and attracting
new stores and companies.
Goal 4: Revitalize the Vallco Shopping District so it becomes a
cohesive, vibrant shopping and entertainment destination that
serves both the region and the local community.
Goal 5: Maintain and enhance Cupertino’s quality of life so the
city remains a desirable place to live, work, recreate and raise a
family.
Goal 6: Revise existing General Plan policies and diagrams as
they reflect to the goals listed above, and make additional changes
to address recent State and regional requirements.
Goal 7: Address local needs and regional requirements for new
housing in Cupertino.
Major technology companies, such as Apple Inc., help define Cupertino as the
center of Silicon Valley
Outstanding public schools are a key reason Cupertino is a desirable place to buy
a home and raise a family
The recently built Mary Avenue bike and pedestrian bridge expands mobility
options and provides a critical link across Interstate 280
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION I | INTRODUCTION
6
REPORT PURPOSE
The purpose of the Concept Alternatives Report is to frame the public
discussion on major choices for the future of Cupertino. Each Concept
Alternative presents different options for how the City can address mobil-
ity, urban design, economic development and new housing considerations,
while also addressing the community’s desire for certain types of land uses
and community character. The report is divided into the following sections:
I. Introduction
This section includes an overview of the General Plan Amendment process
and why the City is doing this project.
II. Vision Framework
This section summarizes the extensive community input received to date
and presents the draft 2040 Community Vision and Guiding Principles.
III. Concept Alternatives
This section discusses the various growth and economic demands facing
Cupertino, and summarizes a list of project-wide benefits that could be
tied to new development. The section also presents and describes each of
the three Concept Alternatives.
IV. Next Steps
This section summarizes near-term project workshops and meetings and
how the community can remain involved.
PROJECT SCHEDULE
The General Plan Amendment process is anticipated to take 18 months,
beginning in spring 2013 and concluding with City Council adoption of the
amended General Plan in fall 2014. The following is a summary of each the
timing, milestone products and major community input opportunities for
each project phase.
WHAT IS A GENERAL PLAN?
Every city in California is required to have an adopted general plan.
It is the community’s overarching policy document that defines a
vision for future change and sets the “ground rules” for locating
and designing new projects, expanding the local economy, conserv-
ing resources, improving public services and safety, and fostering
community health. The document, which includes a vision, guiding
principles, goals, policies, standards and programs, functions as the
City’s primary regulatory tool. It is Cupertino’s constitution for future
change and must be used as the basis for all planning-related
decisions made by City staff, the Planning Commission and the City
Council.
The City’s current general plan was adopted in 2005 and covers a
wide variety of topics, ranging from urban design and mobility to
public health and safety. All City specific plans, master plans and
zoning requirements must be consistent with the general plan.
Similarly, all land use and environmental decisions made by the
City Council must be consistent with the general plan. The general
plan itself, however, does not approve or entitle any develop-
ment project. Property owners have control on when they wish to
propose a project, and final development approval decisions are
made on a case-by-case basis by City staff, the Planning Commis-
sion or the City Council.
Kick-off and Existing Conditions
Background research, visioning workshop and
Settings and Opportunities Report
Spring through
Summer 2013
Phase 1
Visioning and Alternatives
Market Study, Retail Strategy, stakeholder en-
gagement, alternatives workshops and Concept
Alternatives Report
Summer 2013
through
Winter 2014
Phase 2
Draft General Plan Amendment
Policy Options Framework, Draft General Plan
Amendment, community open house and environ-
mental analysis (Draft EIR)
Winter through
Summer 2014
Phase 3
Public Hearings and Adoption
Community Open House, formal public hearings,
and final General Plan Amendment and EIR
Summer through
Fall 2014Phase 4
II. Vision Framework
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION II | VISION FRAMEWORK
8
Defining Our FutureCupertino is at a key milestone in its evolution. The city is a desir-
able place to live and work with many great amenities that
benefit current residents and the larger region. However, the
community has identified a lack of certain retail uses, housing types
and a real “downtown.” It has also been nearly 10 years since the com-
munity last framed a comprehensive vision for the future.
This General Plan Amendment project involves a focused update to the
City’s 2005 General Plan. Many goals, policies and programs included in
the current General Plan still serve the City and community well. However,
given the various growth demands and potential for new development
proposals, now is the ideal time for the community to work together and
identify how Cupertino might change over the next 26 years (2014-
2040).
This section summarizes the visioning process that has been completed as
part of the General Plan Amendment project. This included extensive com-
munity outreach and participation that resulted in a draft 2040 Community
Vision and Guiding Principles. The updated Vision and Guiding Principles
will become the foundation for the amended General Plan. Ultimately, all
goals, policies, standards and programs included in the General Plan will
need to be consistent with the Community Vision and Guiding Principles.
STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS
During May and June 2013, the City hosted nearly 30 one-on-one stake-
holder interviews in order to better understand what the community feels
are the major assets, challenges and opportunities facing Cupertino. This
included interviews with each City Council member and City Commission
chair; representatives from De Anza College, Fremont Union High School
District, Cupertino Union School District and the Santa Clara Valley Transit
Authority; and members of Concerned Citizens of Cupertino (CCC) and
Cupertino Against Rezoning (CARe). The City and the project consultants
also met with each Study Area property owner, including all individual own-
ership groups at the Vallco Mall site, and representatives from Apple Inc.
These interviews were intentionally informal discussions that provided an
opportunity to better understand a broad spectrum of community ideas
and concerns. Input from these sessions was used to help inform the
visioning process and the draft Concept Alternatives.
COMMUNITY-WIDE WORKSHOP #1
On July 18, 2013, the City hosted a community-wide workshop to kick-off
the General Plan Amendment project. Over 45 engaged people attended
the workshop and provided extensive feedback on Cupertino’s many
assets, challenges and opportunities. The workshop included an overview
presentation followed by break-out group discussions. Each group was
asked to answer the following three questions:
1. What key physical, environmental or social assets help define Cuper-
tino and need to be protected in the future?
2. What significant mobility, urban design or economic challenges should
be addressed by the General Plan Amendment?
3. What future opportunities should be explored as the community plans
for the next 15 to 20 years?
Participants provided a wealth of thoughts, ideas and perspectives related
to the three questions, as shown on the following page. This input was
critical in helping to develop land use, mobility and urban design concepts
that were used later in the visioning process.
A group discussing Cupertino’s assets during Community-wide Workshop #1
A listing of assets, challenges and opportunities identified by one group during
Community-wide Workshop #1
Click here to download the Community-wide Workshop #1 Summaryi
9GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION II | VISION FRAMEWORK
Community-wide Workshop #1 Input
Assets: Key existing physical, environmental and social assets the
community identified to be protected include:
• Cupertino’s great quality of life
• The diverse and multicultural community
• The excellent education system and schools
• Solid municipal funding
• Natural beauty
• Low crime
• The bikeability of the community
• Good traffic flow
• Responsive public works and great public facilities
• Good City communications
• Good access to jobs and education
• Overall connectivity of the city
• Farmers’ markets
Challenges: Significant mobility, urban design and economic chal-
lenges the community felt should be addressed by the General Plan
Amendment included:
• Poor overall urban design and inconsistent quality in
architecture, building materials and colors
• Small building setbacks
• Inefficient City development review and approval process
• Lack of late night activities
• Unreliable City revenue stream
• No clear strategy for how Cupertino should grow or change in
the future
• Need new options for improving the Vallco Shopping District,
including possibly adding housing
• Lack of inclusive signage throughout Cupertino
• Bad traffic, particularly along Bubb Road and De Anza
Boulevard
• Lack of public transit and biking options
• Poor air quality
• Lack of parks
• Concern that growth will impact schools, which are at capacity
• Need to maintain a sense of community as the city grows
• Lack of adequate grocery stores and public gathering spaces to
serve the community
Opportunities: Major future opportunities the community felt
should be explored as the community plans for the next 15 to 20
years included:
• Creating more housing diversity (different types of homes)
• Improving technology
• Creating more retail
• Building a museum
• Creating more community gathering spaces
• Improving signal timing at intersections and expanding mass
transit
• Allowing food trucks and mobile vendors
• Retaining and recruiting good businesses
• Identifying creative infrastructure solutions
• Establishing City-school-industry partnerships
• Improving City communications
• Creating senior housing choices
• Encouraging higher-end stores at Vallco Mall
• Redeveloping older commercial corridors and areas
• Improving both social and physical connectivity throughout the
community
A group discussing opportunities during Community-wide Workshop #1
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION II | VISION FRAMEWORK
10
MOBILITY AND DESIGN CONCEPTS INPUT
Building on Community-wide Workshop #1, the City hosted a series of
community workshops and meetings between October 2013 and January
2014 to solicit the community’s input on future land use, height, mobility
and urban design improvements along the major mixed-use corridors in
Cupertino. The major mixed-use corridors include Homestead Road, De
Anza Boulevard, Wolfe Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard. During these
workshops, participants were also able to “weigh-in” on their ideas for the
future of the Vallco Shopping District. Nearly 170 people attended one of
the following four workshops and meetings:
• Community-wide Workshop #2, October 23, 2013
• Neighborhood Meeting, December 5, 2013
• Chamber of Commerce Workshop, January 29, 2014
• Neighborhood Block Leader’s Meeting, January 29, 2014
Because community interest in the workshop exercises was so high, the
City also developed an online version of both the Community Design
Survey and the Vallco Shopping District mapping exercise that was posted
online from November 2013 – January 2014. This provided an option for
members of the community who could not attend a workshop or meeting
to provide their thoughts and ideas.
Since the workshops, meetings and online survey largely covered the same
questions and exercises, the City prepared one combined summary of
community input. The following is an overview of the major input received
during the Mobility and Design Concepts outreach. A full summary is avail-
able on the project website.
Vallco Mapping Exercise
Over 24 small groups completed the Vallco Mapping Exercise. The first
part of the exercise involved discussing and identifying needed mobility
and open space improvements within the Vallco Shopping District area,
such as improved transit, new bike and pedestrian facilities, or additional
parks. The second part of the exercise involved identifying what types of
uses are most appropriate at Vallco in the future. This exercise asked the
groups to think about what types of things they desire at Vallco. While the
area has considerable legal and economic constraints, the purpose of the
exercise was to understand community desires. The exercise was intention-
ally flexible, and while some groups wanted no change in the mall other
than re-tenating, many groups contemplated tearing down the mall and
creating something completely new. Major common themes identified by
groups that wanted the site redeveloped included:
• Create a special and successful place that has desirable retail uses and
can become the “downtown” for Cupertino
• Transform Vallco Mall into an outdoor, pedestrian-focused commercial
and entertainment district that includes open space and small parks
• Move parking to the edges of Vallco and improve safety for bicyclists
and pedestrians
Major Mixed-Use Corridors Exercise
Some workshops and meetings included an exercise that asked groups
to identify major mobility, land use and urban design improvements that
are needed along each of the four mixed-use corridors. Major common
themes identified by groups included:
• Improving bicycle mobility and safety along all major roadways
• Retaining the residential character of the Homestead Road corridor by
evaluating future uses carefully
• Improving the overall urban design of the corridors, and improve transit
A group of students providing their thoughts on the future of the Vallco Mall
during Community-wide Workshop #2
Participants completing the interactive Community Design Survey during
Community-wide Workshop #2
Click here to download the Mobility and Design Concepts Input Summaryi
11GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION II | VISION FRAMEWORK
Highly Visible Pedestrian Crossing Wide Sidewalk with Seating Outdoor Dining Separated Bike Lane Enhanced Bus Shelter Neighborhood Park
Children’s Play Space Small Plaza Trail ConnectionsLow Rise Commercial with Small Street Setback Mid Rise Mixed-Use Residential and Retail Mid Rise Outdoor Commercial District
Mid Rise Outdoor Commercial District Mid Rise Office Mid Rise Mixed-use Office Low to Mid Rise Hotel Mid Rise Hotel Mixed-Use Residential and Retail
Community Design Survey
Over 120 people completed an interactive Community Design Survey,
either during Community-wide Workshop #2 or online. The images below
represent land use, mobility, open space and urban design concepts that
more than 65 percent of people said “I Really Like it” or it is “Worth
Considering” (the top two categories of the survey). In addition to identi-
fying concepts people liked or disliked, participants were also asked to
identify which of the four major mixed-use corridor the concept would be
the most appropriate for. For instance, Separated Bike Path was identified
as a desirable concept along Homestead Road and Stevens Creek Boule-
vard.
Although it was not a scientific survey, this community input was used by
the City to help develop ideas included in the draft Concept Alternatives.
In addition, this input will also be used to recommend new or revised pol-
icies and programs in the amended General Plan. These new policies and
programs will create an updated mobility and urban design framework
that will guide future public improvements (such as streets, sidewalks,
transit and parks) as well as private investment (including buildings, struc-
tures and uses).
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION II | VISION FRAMEWORK
12
Community members discussing ideas for the major mixed-use corridors during
the Neighborhood Meeting
A group discussing ideas for the future of the Vallco Shopping District during the
Chamber of Commerce workshop
A community member describing his group’s vision for the future of the Vallco
Shopping District during the Neighborhood Block Leaders workshop
DRAFT 2040 COMMUNITY VISION
The draft 2040 Community Vision is based on the current 2005 General
Plan’s vision, but it has been updated to reflect extensive community input.
This includes ideas, thoughts and desires from residents, local business
and property owners, study area stakeholders, elected and appointed offi-
cials, and other members of the Cupertino community.
The updated vision (see following page) expresses the community’s desires
for Cupertino’s future. The vision describes the community’s overall phi-
losophy regarding the character and accessibility of existing and new
neighborhoods in addition to the mixed-use corridors. This is a draft vision,
and is intended to be refined based on additional community input and
direction from the Planning Commission and City Council.
DRAFT 2040 GUIDING PRINCIPLES
The draft 2040 Guiding Principles (shown after the vision) provide addi-
tional detail about Cupertino’s future. Similar to the Community Vision, the
Guiding Principles build from the current 2005 General Plan’s Guiding Prin-
ciples but have been updated based on extensive community input. The
Guiding Principles are intended to be refined based on additional commu-
nity input and direction from the Planning Commission and City Council.
13GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION II | VISION FRAMEWORK
Draft 2040 Community Vision
Cupertino aspires to be a balanced community with quiet and attractive residential neighborhoods;
exemplary parks and schools; accessible open space areas, hillsides and creeks; and a vibrant, mixed-
use “Heart of the City.” Cupertino will be safe, friendly, healthy, connected, walkable,
bikeable and inclusive for all residents and workers, with ample places and opportunities for people
to interact, recreate, innovate and collaborate.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION II | VISION FRAMEWORK
14
Guiding Principle #1: Develop Cohesive Neighborhoods
Ensure that all neighborhoods are safe, attractive and include convenient
pedestrian and bicycle access to a “full-service” of local amenities such as
parks, schools, community activity centers, trails, bicycle paths and shop-
ping.
Guiding Principle #4: Enhance Mobility
Ensure the efficient and safe movement of cars, trucks, transit, pedestri-
ans, bicyclists and disabled persons throughout Cupertino in order to fully
accommodate Cupertino’s residents, workers, visitors and students of all
ages and abilities.
Guiding Principle #2: Improve Public Health and Safety
Promote public health by increasing community-wide access to healthy
foods; ensuring an adequate amount of safe, well-designed parks, open
space, trails and pathways; and improve safety by ensuring all areas of the
community are protected from natural hazards and fully served by police,
fire, paramedic and health services.
Guiding Principle #5: Ensure a Balanced Community
Offer residents a full range of housing choices necessary to accommodate
the changing needs of a demographically and economically diverse popu-
lation, while also providing a full range of support uses including regional
and local shopping, education, employment, entertainment, recreation,
and daily needs that are within easy walking distance.
Guiding Principle #3: Improve Connectivity
Create a well-connected and safe system of trails, pedestrian and bicycle
paths, sidewalks and streets that weave the community together, enhance
neighborhood pride and identity, and create access to interesting routes to
different destinations.
Guiding Principle #6: Support Vibrant, Mixed-Use Businesses
Ensure that Cupertino’s major mixed-use corridors and commercial nodes
are vibrant, successful, attractive, friendly and comfortable with inviting
active pedestrian spaces and services that meet the daily needs of resi-
dents and workers.
15GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION II | VISION FRAMEWORK
Guiding Principle #7: Ensure Attractive Community Design
Ensure that buildings, landscapes and streets are attractively designed
and well maintained so they can complement the overall community fabric
by framing major streets and offering desirable and active pedestrian
spaces.
Guiding Principle #10: Preserve the Environment
Preserve Cupertino’s environment by enhancing or restoring creeks and
hillsides to their natural state, limiting urban uses to existing urbanized
areas, encouraging environmental protection, promoting sustainable
design concepts, improving sustainable municipal operations, adapting to
climate change, conserving energy resources and minimizing waste.
Guiding Principle #8: Embrace Diversity
Celebrate Cupertino’s diversity by offering a range of housing, shopping
and community programs that meet the needs of the full spectrum of
the community, while ensuring equal opportunities for all residents and
workers regardless of age, cultural or physical differences.
Guiding Principle #11: Ensure Fiscal Self Reliance
Maintain fiscal self-reliance in order to protect the City’s ability to deliver
essential, high-quality municipal services and facilities to the community.
Guiding Principle #9: Support Education
Preserve and support Cupertino’s excellent public education system by
partnering with local school districts and De Anza College to improve
school facilities and infrastructure, developing quality City facilities and
programs that enhance learning, and expanding community-wide access
to technology infrastructure.
Guiding Principle #12: Ensure a Responsive Government
Continue to be a regional leader in accessible and transparent municipal
government, promote community leadership and local partnerships with
local and regional agencies, and remain flexible and responsive to chang-
ing community needs.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION II | VISION FRAMEWORK
16
OTHER PROJECT DOCUMENTS
In addition to the wealth of community input received during the initial
series of community workshops, meetings and surveys, the City also pre-
pared a series of key technical documents. These documents provide the
existing setting and economic conditions context that helped frame the
development of the Concept Alternatives.
Settings and Opportunities Report
Published in September 2013, this report includes a summary of the current
planning context in Cupertino, including the 2005 General Plan, adopted
specific and master plans, and current mobility and economic conditions.
The report also includes detailed existing land use, design and mobility
conditions for each of the seven project Study Areas.
Market Study
Published in February 2014, this report provides background information
on demographic and employment trends in Cupertino, Santa Clara County
and the greater Bay Area. It assesses market trends and demand for new
residential, retail, hotel and office development in Cupertino. This includes
an analysis for how increased development allocation responds to market
demands.
Retail Strategy
This forthcoming report will identify each Study Area’s suitability for new or
re-purposed retail development. Specifically, the report includes a detailed
summary and analysis of retail conditions, prototypes and options for the
Vallco Shopping District.
CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES PHASE SCHEDULE
The Concept Alternatives Phase is a major portion of the General Plan
Amendment process. The thoughts and ideas developed by the com-
munity, and the technical and market analysis developed by the City
and project consultants, has resulted in a series of Concept Alternatives
that will be the basis for extensive community discussion. The follow-
ing diagram outlines the Concept Alternative Phase (see Section IV for
detailed information on upcoming meetings and study sessions).
Cupertino’s retail trade area, as identified in the Market Study
Cover of the Settings and Opportunities Report
Community
Input
Study Area
Stakeholder
Input
Concept
Alternatives
Technical
Reports
Concept
Alternatives
Report
Planning
Commission
Study
Session
City
Council
Study
Session
Joint Study
Session
(Council and
Commission)
October 2013 through
January 2014
February 2014
February 19, 2014March 4, 2014 April 1, 2014
Click here to download the Market Studyi
III. Concept
Alternatives
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION III | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES
18
Identifying Options for the FutureThe Cupertino community and Study Area stakeholders have pro-
vided a wealth of ideas, desires and concerns related to future
change in the city. There are many options the community can
choose to address current and future needs. The overarching goal is to
ensure that if changes are made to the 2005 General Plan, they result
in projects and developments that are desirable, provide direct com-
munity benefits, and are economically feasible and successful.
This section summarizes Cupertino’s current regulatory structure as estab-
lished under the 2005 General Plan, and details several factors that are
currently influencing change in the city. This section also describes three
draft Concept Alternatives (A, B and C) and evaluates how well they
achieve the community’s economic development and fiscal health objec-
tives.
CUPERTINO’S REGULATORY STRUCTURE
The City regulates land use through a variety of methods based on the
goals and policies developed by the community in the 2005 General Plan.
The following is a summary of three key policy tools the City uses to regu-
late both the location and intensity of new development.
Land Use Standards
The 2005 General Plan includes a series of land use designations that
define the intensity of future development for each parcel in Cupertino.
These standards identify allowable land uses (commercial, office, resi-
dential, etc.) and appropriate building heights and setbacks, residential
densities, and urban design character.
The land use designations set clear expectations for future development,
create an innovative incentive program for community benefits such as a
range of housing for all income levels, and provide for local-serving retail
spaces and distinctive architecture. They also proactively manage future
traffic congestion by focusing new development on transit and requiring a
range of transportation measures or impact fees, encouraging more resi-
dents and workers to walk, bike or ride transit.
Land Use Diagram
The General Plan Land Use Diagram identifies the location for where each
land use designation is applied citywide. It is a geographic tool that, in
concert with the Land Use Designations, establishes the policy framework
for regulating development throughout Cupertino.
Development Allocation
In addition to the Land Use Diagram and Standards, the City uses a Devel-
opment Allocation system to manage growth. The purpose of this system
is to ensure that new development fulfills community goals and priorities.
The City currently allocates development potential on a case-by-case basis
to private projects based on the community benefits the project would
provide. The remaining 2005 General Plan development allocations are low
and need to be replenished to ensure that the City’s economic needs and
goals are met. However, allocation increases require an amendment to the
General Plan, which is a key reasons why the City initiated the General Plan
Amendment project.
CategoryRemaining Citywide Development Allocation*
Office 540,231 square feet
Commercial 701,413 square feet
Hotel 339 rooms
Residential 1,895 dwelling units
* Remaining allocation as of December 2013
The Community Form diagram in the 2005 General
Plan identifies several major districts and viewshed
policy boundaries
19GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION III | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES
!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!!
!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HOMESTEAD ROAD
SPECIAL CENTER
SOUTH VALLCO PARK
SPECIAL CENTER
CITY
CENTER
SPECIAL
CENTER
NORTH DE ANZA BOULEVARD
SPECIAL CENTER
De Anza CollegeMONTA VISTA
SPECIAL CENTER
FAIRGROVE
SPECIAL CENTER
OAK VALLEY
SPECIAL CENTER
Regnart
Canyon
Stevens Creek Reservoir
Cemetary
Subject to 5-20 Acre S/D Formula upon
Residential Development
Inspiration Heights
Note: Land use densities for lands located outside
the urban service area shall be consistent with
residential densities established by the County of
Santa Clara General Plan.
Urban Service Area
Rancho
San Antonio
County Park
Urban
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
A
r
e
a
BUBB ROAD
SPECIAL CENTER
DE
A
N
Z
A
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
LA
W
R
E
N
C
E
E
X
P
R
E
S
S
W
A
Y
STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
FO
O
T
H
I
L
L
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
PROSPECT ROAD
TA
N
T
A
U
A
V
E
N
U
E
RAINBOW DRIVE
BU
B
B
R
O
A
D
ST
E
L
L
I
N
G
R
O
A
D
ST
E
V
E
N
S
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
O
A
D
McCLELLAN ROAD
Stev
e
n
s
Cree
k
Regnart Creek
Cal
a
b
a
z
a
s
Cre
e
k
Sa
r
a
t
o
g
a
Cr
e
e
k
Perm
e
n
e
n
t
e
C
r
e
e
k
#
#
#
BL
A
N
E
Y
A
V
E
N
U
E
BOLLINGER ROAD
HOMESTEAD ROAD
MIL
L
E
R
A
V
E
N
U
E
WO
L
F
E
R
O
A
D
Sp
h
e
r
e
o
f
I
n
f
l
u
e
n
c
e
Private OS
Private
Recreation
Private
OS
Hanson Quarry
BU
B
B
R
O
A
D
ST
E
L
L
I
N
G
R
O
A
D
McCLEL
L
A
N
R
O
A
D
Former Quarry
STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
DE
A
N
Z
A
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
BL
A
N
E
Y
A
V
E
N
U
E
ST
E
L
L
I
N
G
R
O
A
D
HOMESTEAD ROAD
#
#
See Policy 2-21
Strategy 3
#
§¨¦ 280
§¨¦ 280
STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
VOSS AVENUE
McCLELL
A
N
R
O
A
D
Stev
e
n
s
Cre
e
k
RAINBOW DRIVE
DE
A
N
Z
A
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
BOLLI
N
G
E
R
R
O
A
D
PACIFICA DRIVE
SILVERADO AVENUE
TO
R
R
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
PO
R
T
A
L
A
V
E
N
U
E
LAZANEO DRIVE
MERRITT DRIVE
ALVES DRIVE
WO
L
F
E
R
O
A
D
PR
U
N
E
R
I
D
G
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
TA
N
T
A
U
A
V
E
N
U
E
VALLCO PARKWAY
NORTH VALLCO PARK
SPECIAL CENTER
HEART OF THE CITY
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
Reg
n
a
r
t
Cree
k
BARNHART AVENUE JO
H
N
S
O
N
A
V
E
N
U
E
FIN
C
H
A
V
E
N
U
E
EA
S
T
E
S
T
A
T
E
S
D
R
I
V
E
RODRIGUES AVENUE
FALLENLEAF LANE
REG
N
A
R
T
R
O
A
D
COLUMBUS AVENUE
HYANNISPORT AVENUE
PALM AVENUE
BY
R
N
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
OR
A
N
G
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
IM
P
E
R
I
A
L
A
V
E
N
U
E
PA
S
A
D
E
N
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
PH
A
R
L
A
P
D
R
I
V
E
BARR
A
N
C
A
D
R
I
V
E
CRIS
T
O
R
E
Y
D
R
I
V
E
GREENLEAF DRIVE
VALLEY GREEN DRIVE
WHEATON DRIVE
85
!!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!!
!
!!
!!
!
!!
!
!!
!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!
!!!!!!
!
!
!
!!!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HOMESTEAD ROAD
SPECIAL CENTER
SOUTH VALLCO PARK
SPECIAL CENTER
CITY
CENTER
SPECIAL
CENTER
NORTH DE ANZA BOULEVARD
SPECIAL CENTER
De Anza CollegeMONTA VISTA
SPECIAL CENTER
FAIRGROVE
SPECIAL CENTER
OAK VALLEY
SPECIAL CENTER
Regnart
Canyon
Stevens Creek Reservoir
Cemetary
Subject to 5-20 Acre S/D Formula upon
Residential Development
Inspiration Heights
Note: Land use densities for lands located outside
the urban service area shall be consistent with
residential densities established by the County of
Santa Clara General Plan.
Urban Service Area
Rancho
San Antonio
County Park
Urban
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
A
r
e
a
BUBB ROAD
SPECIAL CENTER
DE
A
N
Z
A
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
LA
W
R
E
N
C
E
E
X
P
R
E
S
S
W
A
Y
STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
FO
O
T
H
I
L
L
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
PROSPECT ROAD
TA
N
T
A
U
A
V
E
N
U
E
RAINBOW DRIVE
BU
B
B
R
O
A
D
ST
E
L
L
I
N
G
R
O
A
D
ST
E
V
E
N
S
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
O
A
D
McCLELLAN ROAD
Stev
e
n
s
Cree
k
Regnart Creek
Cal
a
b
a
z
a
s
Cre
e
k
Sa
r
a
t
o
g
a
Cr
e
e
k
Perm
e
n
e
n
t
e
C
r
e
e
k
#
#
#
BL
A
N
E
Y
A
V
E
N
U
E
BOLLINGER ROAD
HOMESTEAD ROAD
MIL
L
E
R
A
V
E
N
U
E
WO
L
F
E
R
O
A
D
Sp
h
e
r
e
o
f
I
n
f
l
u
e
n
c
e
Private OS
Private
Recreation
Private
OS
Hanson Quarry
BU
B
B
R
O
A
D
ST
E
L
L
I
N
G
R
O
A
D
McCLEL
L
A
N
R
O
A
D
Former Quarry
STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
DE
A
N
Z
A
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
BL
A
N
E
Y
A
V
E
N
U
E
ST
E
L
L
I
N
G
R
O
A
D
HOMESTEAD ROAD
#
#
See Policy 2-21
Strategy 3
#
§¨¦ 280
§¨¦ 280
STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
VOSS AVENUE
McCLELL
A
N
R
O
A
D
Stev
e
n
s
Cre
e
k
RAINBOW DRIVE
DE
A
N
Z
A
B
O
U
L
E
V
A
R
D
BOLLI
N
G
E
R
R
O
A
D
PACIFICA DRIVE
SILVERADO AVENUE
TO
R
R
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
PO
R
T
A
L
A
V
E
N
U
E
LAZANEO DRIVE
MERRITT DRIVE
ALVES DRIVE
WO
L
F
E
R
O
A
D
PR
U
N
E
R
I
D
G
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
TA
N
T
A
U
A
V
E
N
U
E
VALLCO PARKWAY
NORTH VALLCO PARK
SPECIAL CENTER
HEART OF THE CITY
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
Reg
n
a
r
t
Cree
k
BARNHART AVENUE JO
H
N
S
O
N
A
V
E
N
U
E
FIN
C
H
A
V
E
N
U
E
EA
S
T
E
S
T
A
T
E
S
D
R
I
V
E
RODRIGUES AVENUE
FALLENLEAF LANE
REG
N
A
R
T
R
O
A
D
COLUMBUS AVENUE
HYANNISPORT AVENUE
PALM AVENUE
BY
R
N
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
OR
A
N
G
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
IM
P
E
R
I
A
L
A
V
E
N
U
E
PA
S
A
D
E
N
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
PH
A
R
L
A
P
D
R
I
V
E
BARR
A
N
C
A
D
R
I
V
E
CRIS
T
O
R
E
Y
D
R
I
V
E
GREENLEAF DRIVE
VALLEY GREEN DRIVE
WHEATON DRIVE
85
Prepared by the Community Development Department
Adopted: November 15, 2005
Amended: November 15th, 2011
0.75
Miles
Neighborhood Commercial / Residential
Residential (0-4.4 DU/Gr. Ac.)
Residential (4.4-12 DU/Gr. Ac.)
Residential (4.4-7.7 DU/Gr. Ac.)
Monta Vista Land Use Designations
Low Density (1-6 DU/Gr. Ac.) Rancho Rinconada
High Density (20-35 DU/Gr. Ac.)
Low Density (1-5 DU/Gr. Ac.)
Medium / High Density (10-20 DU/Gr. Ac.)
Low / Medium Density (5-10 DU/Gr. Ac.)
Very Low Density (1/2 Acre Slope Density Formula)
Very Low Density (5-20 Acre Slope Density Formula)
Very Low Density (Slope Density Formula)
Residential Land Use Designations
Commercial / Office / Residential
Commercial / Residential
Industrial / Residential
Office / Industrial / Commercial / Residential
Non-Residential Land Use Designations
Industrial / Residential / Commercial
Quasi-Public / Institutional Overlay
Parks and Open Space
Public Facilities
Quasi-Public / Institutional
Transportation
Riparian Corridor
Urban Service Area
Special Center Boundaries
Creeks
Sphere of Influence
Legend
!!!!Heart of the City Specific Plan Area
City of Cupertino
Land Use Map
The Land Use Diagram in the
2005 General Plan identifies
where land use standards are
applied throughout Cupertino
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION III | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES
20
FACTORS INFLUENCING CHANGE IN CUPERTINO
Like most cities in the Bay Area, Cupertino is faced with ongoing demand
for new development - whether it is to serve the existing population, such
as new stores and housing, or to serve regional commercial and employ-
ment needs. Taking a comprehensive look at all factors influencing change
in Cupertino will help the City and community better understand what
options should be considered. The following are some key factors influenc-
ing change in Cupertino.
Desire for a Vibrant Downtown
Throughout the General Plan Amendment process there has been exten-
sive community feedback about the desire to create a vibrant, successful
downtown for Cupertino. A place where residents, visitors and workers can
live, socialize, relax and shop. One potential location for a new downtown
is the Vallco Shopping District area. This area is large, close to transit and
freeways, and has the most potential for revitalization. In order to transform
the Vallco Shopping District into a true downtown for Cupertino, there
needs to be enough regulatory and economic incentive to encourage the
various private property owners to invest in a significant redesign of the
area.
Retail Sales Leakage
A detailed Market Study has been prepared as part of the General Plan
Amendment project. The report found that Cupertino has a significant
amount of retail sales leakage. This means that consumer goods that might
be purchased by local residents and workers in Cupertino are actually
being bought somewhere else (e.g., people are leaving Cupertino to go
shopping). Much of this leakage from Cupertino is attributable to a strong
surrounding Regional Trade Area, with ample shopping centers and retail
facilities serving the larger South Bay. While most communities face some
level of retail sales leakage, the disproportionately high amount of leakage
in Cupertino hurts both the local economy and the City’s fiscal health (as a
result of less sales tax revenue).
Depleted Development Allocation
The City currently has limited remaining office development allocation.
While there is 540,231 square feet remaining, most of this allocation is
specified for “Major Employers,” which the 2005 General Plan identifies as
a larger corporate headquarters. In addition, all remaining commercial allo-
cation (701,413 square feet) is designated for the Heart of the City Specific
Plan Area. As a result, there is a need to replenish the allocation system in
order to ensure that certain office and commercial areas can be revitalized,
in particular the Vallco Shopping District. Additional development alloca-
tion would also allow for the periodic re-purposing of existing office and
commercial uses so they can better compete for top tenants.
Regional Housing Mandates
Like all cities in California, the State mandates that Cupertino identify
locations to accommodate its future fair share of regional affordable
and market rate housing. The City is currently in the process of updat-
ing the Housing Element of the General Plan, concurrent with the larger
General Plan Amendment process. The Housing Element is required to
provide an inventory of land adequately zoned or planned to be zoned to
accommodate its fair share of housing allocation. The Association of Bay
Area Governments’ (ABAG) Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA)
indicates that the City must plan to accommodate 1,064 units for the
upcoming Housing Element cycle.
As a part of the Housing Element Update process, the City is reviewing
several sites within the city limits for residential potential. Upon review, the
housing sites inventory list will be updated to reflect redevelopment and to
identify additional sites, if needed, to meet the City’s RHNA obligation. As
a result, the City and community are presented with a challenge in trying to
identify the best possible locations for future housing in Cupertino.
Study Areas
A key initial driver of the General Plan Amendment was to understand and
evaluate potential development proposals on seven key Study Areas within
the city’s major mixed-use corridors in Cupertino. The Study Areas (see the
following page) represent locations in Cupertino where property owners
have expressed interest in height or development allocation changes, and
where more intense development could be located to meet economic
development goals within existing major mixed-use corridors. The seven
Study Areas include:
1. Cupertino Inn and Goodyear Tire
2. City Center
3. PG&E
4. Mirapath
5. Cupertino Village
6. Vallco Shopping District
7. Stevens Creek Office Center
The Study Areas represent a significant amount of land within Cupertino
for potential new or repurposed uses (121 acres). Please see the Settings
and Opportunities Report for detailed information about each Study Area’s
existing uses, building form and character, and parcel sizes.
Click here to download the Market Studyi
Click here to download the Settings and Opportunities Reporti
21GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION III | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES
LA
W
R
E
N
C
E
E
X
P
Y
BL
A
N
E
Y
A
V
E
DE
A
N
Z
A
B
L
V
D
MI
L
L
E
R
A
V
E
TA
N
T
A
U
A
V
E
ST
E
L
L
I
N
G
A
V
E
STEVENS CREEK BLVD
HOMESTEAD RD
PRUN ER I DGE
WO
L
F
E
R
D
Cupertino Sports Center
JollymanPark
CreeksidePark
WilsonPark
Rancho RinconadaCounty Park
PortalPark
FrancoPark
De Anza
College
Apple
Inc.
Apple
Campus
2
Cupertino
Crossroads
Center
Market
Place
City
Hall
Homestead
Square
The Oaks
Cupertino
Library
Lawson
Middle School
Collins
Elementary
School
William Faria
Elementary
School
Target/
Bottegas
Quinlan
Community
Center
Garden Gate
Elementary
School
Homestead
High School
Saint Joseph of
Cupertino School
Cupertino
High
School
280
85
85
SUNNYVALE
SANTA
CLARACUPERTINO
City Boundary
City Parcel
Surrounding Cities
Water
Park
Major Road
Minor Road
Freeway
Retail
Office
Civic
Education
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
City Center
PG&E
Study Areas
Mirapath
Cupertino Village
Vallco Shopping District
Stevens Creek Office Center
Cupertino Inn and Goodyear Tire
Study Areas
Study Area
Boundary
Study Area1 0 8001600 2400Feet
N
Garden
Gate
Cupertino
Village
Vallco
Shopping
Center
1
4
3
2
5
6
7
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION III | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES
22
Stevens Creek Corridor Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
Santa Clara Valley Transit Authority (VTA), the South Bay’s regional trans-
portation agency, is studying the possibility of creating a Bus Rapid Transit
(BRT) line along Stevens Creek Boulevard from De Anza College to the
Transit Mall in downtown San Jose. The goal of this project is to address
projected transit demand along Stevens Creek Boulevard, which is cur-
rently the second highest ridership route in the VTA region.
VTA is currently studying options to provide a dedicated route for BRT in
the center of Stevens Creek Boulevard, which would involve the removal
of a driving lane in each direction so it could be dedicated to bus transit.
This would allow BRT buses to move more quickly through Cupertino with
fewer stops. While a new BRT line along Stevens Creek Boulevard would
provide increased transit oppor tunities for residents and students at De
Anza College, there were some community concerns expressed about
removing a driving lane in each direction.
Vallco Shopping Mall
The Vallco Shopping Mall (see following page) was originally constructed
between 1974 and 1979. The mall has gone into decline in recent years and
has lost a number of tenants. Increased competition from other regional
malls, such as Stanford Shopping Center, Valley Fair and Santana Row, has
taken a significant portion of the market share away from Vallco. While
its competitors renovated, expanded and re-tenanted to meet market
demands, Vallco has languished with incomplete development, defaults
from prior ownerships, prolonged and unrealized redevelopment plans,
management changes, and other setbacks.
One commonly cited reason for Vallco’s decline is a mismatch between
the mall’s midrange stores and the growing affluence and changing demo-
graphics of Cupertino and the surrounding area. Another major factor is
the competitive nature of regional mall operations, leasing and manage-
ment. Vallco has not been able to compete against much larger and more
sophisticated shopping destinations else where in the South Bay.
A detailed Retail Strategy is forthcoming as part of the General Plan
Amendment process. The report identifies two possible scenarios for
repositioning Vallco Shopping Mall and creating a more vibrant, economi-
cally successful project. The first includes creating an ideal mix of uses that
would appeal to Cupertino and extended trade area customers without
regard to entitlement or site constraints. The second scenario assumes
existing market factors (e.g., competing projects) and legal limitations
(e.g., land use regulations and deed restrictions) remain in place. Infor-
mation regarding both scenarios was used to help develop Concept
Alternatives B and C.
School Impacts
Increased development in Cupertino, in particular residential growth, could
have an impact on schools in the city. As part of the General Plan Amend-
ment process, City staff has been coordinating with School District staff
to fully understand their concerns and longer-term facility needs. This will
include discussions in the near future about how project-wide benefits from
new development can be crafted to help directly address school facility,
curriculum or safety needs.
An example of proposed BRT improvements in Sunnyvale, showing two dedicat-
ed bus lanes (red pavement) and enhanced transit stops in the center median
VTA’s Stevens Creek Boulevard proposed route map
23GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION III | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES
TA
N
T
A
U
A
V
E
BL
A
N
E
Y
PO
R
T
A
L
WO
L
F
E
R
D
STEVENS CREEK BLVD
VALLCO PKY
CO
L
B
Y
MERRITT
FI
N
C
H
DE
N
I
S
O
N
WHEATON
PE
R
I
M
E
T
E
R
DRAKE
NO
R
W
I
C
H
HO
W
A
R
D
BAYWOOD
AMHERST
JU
D
Y
BR
E
T
PEAR TREE
MI
L
L
E
R
RI
D
G
E
V
I
E
W
ST
E
R
N
AUBURN
GIAN
N
I
N
I
CRAFT
DA
W
S
O
N
ME
A
D
O
W
TWILIGHT
CY
P
R
E
S
S
APRICOT
BRENDA
Alexander’s
Steakhouse
J.C.
Penney
Bowlmor
Ice Center
Cupertino
Vallco
Shopping
Mall
Sears
280
Macy’s
316 20 107
316 20 037
316 20 095
316 20 088
316 20 092
316 20 094
316 20 099
316 20 104
316 20 106
316 20 101
316 20 105
316 20 081
316 20 103
316 20 080
316 20 082
316 20 038
316 20 100
Rose Bowl
Study Area Boundary
Parcel Boundary 0175350700 Feet
N
Study Area: Vallco Shopping District6
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION III | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES
24
CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES
Three draft Concept Alternatives outline different future scenarios for
how and where change can occur in Cupertino. The alternatives were
developed to respond to local and regional economic growth factors and
housing needs, while also addressing community desires about the appro-
priate location and intensity of potential future development. The concept
alternatives capture the input received from outreach efforts and reflects a
broad spectrum of opinions and preferences. In general, the alternatives
move from less intense to more intense development in the progression
from Alternative A to Alternative C.
Each Concept Alternative proposes a level of future development intensity
above the current 2005 General Plan. This includes changes to land uses,
heights and development allocation. The alternatives specifically focus
these changes on five major mixed-use corridors in the core of Cupertino:
• Homestead Corridor: Includes the area surrounding Homestead Road
between Stelling and Blaney avenues, within Cupertino city limits.
• North Wolfe Corridor: Includes the area west of Wolfe Road and
north of I-280, within Cupertino city limits.
• Heart of the City Corridor: Includes the commercial, office, residential
and public/quasi-public uses along Stevens Creek Boulevard, and all
of the Vallco Shopping District. This corridor has the same boundary as
the current Heart of the City Specific Plan.
• North De Anza Corridor: Includes the office area along De Anza Bou-
levard between Stevens Creek Boulevard and I-280.
• South De Anza Corridor: Includes commercial, office and residential
areas along De Anza Boulevard south of Stevens Creek Boulevard.
The major mixed-use corridors represent key areas within Cupertino where
future development could be focused. As a result, all other areas in the city
would largely be preserved under any alternative. Protecting and enhanc-
The Homestead Corridor runs along the city’s northern border and includes
commercial uses, the PG&E facility, and several low, medium and high density
residential neighborhoods
The North Wolfe Corridor is a major north/south connector that includes office,
commercial and hotel uses and is adjacent to the recently approved Apple 2 cam-
pus project
The North De Anza Corridor is a major north/south connector that includes
many office and commercial uses
The Heart of the City Corridor includes many of the city’s largest commercial, office, mixed-use and residential uses along Stevens Creek Boulevard. It also includes
the entire Vallco Shopping District
The South De Anza Corridor is a north/south connector that includes smaller
scale commercial, office and residential uses
25GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION III | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES
ing existing neighborhoods is a key theme heard at many General Plan
Amendment workshops and meetings. However, each alternative does
include some minor development allocation changes within areas outside
of the major mixed-use corridors (see Other Special Areas summary on the
diagrams). This is because either the 2005 General Plan includes allocation
to these areas, there is a need to include some development allocation so
existing commercial uses can be remodeled as needed, or the Housing
Element identifies residential growth in these areas.
Each alternative diagram shows the boundaries and intensity of devel-
opment proposed for the five mixed-use corridors. This includes tables
that summarize primary uses, maximum residential densities, maximum
heights, and development allocation. Tables also summarize specific
standards for eight different gateways, nodes and sub areas within the
mixed-use corridors. While development allocation is divided by the corri-
dors, maximum residential density and building heights vary through each
of the eight smaller areas. The reason for this is to identify areas within
the mixed-use corridors where residential density and height increase are
appropriate if the developer provides project-wide benefits.
The narrative descriptions that accompany the diagrams provide a
detailed summary of each alternative’s “theme,” purpose and key com-
ponents, economic and fiscal impacts, and resulting corridor mobility and
design characteristics.
Tying Development to Project-wide Benefits
Workshop participants suggested that in order to build taller than the
maximum allowed height, new development must provide a retail compo-
nent and/or project-wide benefits for the City and the community. These
benefits include items that were discussed by the community as being
needed or desirable in Cupertino. The box to the right identifies an initial
list of project-wide benefits for further community discussion. The ratio-
nale for this approach is to ensure that new, more intensive development
directly benefits- the broader Cupertino community, beyond just eco-
nomic or fiscal benefits.
The following pages present draft Concept Alternatives A, B and C.
PROJECT-WIDE BENEFITS
Based upon discretionary review and approval, additional height
and residential density may be achieved by incorporating some of
the following project-wide benefits into either the design of the
project or through direct funding (listed alphabetically):*
• Affordable Housing
• Arts and Cultural Facility
• Bike and Pedestrian Trail
• Childcare Center
• Community Facility
• Conference Space
• Museum
• Parks and Open Space
• Senior Center
• School Facility or Funding
• Shuttle (move people around commercial areas)
• Tax Revenue Generators
• Transit Amenities
• Transportation Improvements
• Youth Facility
* Note: this is a draft list and is intended to be refined during the General Plan
Amendment process
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION III | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES
26
Alternative A
Themes
• Maintain the policies of the 2005 General Plan
• Increase office and hotel development allocation
• Streamline General Plan area boundaries
Summary
Alternative A identifies how growth would occur if the City largely con-
tinues the policies of the current 2005 General Plan, while making minor
development allocation and boundary changes. Under this alternative
there are no changes to existing land use designations, height limits or
development standards. However, this alternative includes an additional
500,000 square feet of office allocation (1,040,231 total) and 261 hotel
rooms (600 total). This alternative also includes streamlining the current
2005 General Plan special center boundaries into a series of five new corri-
dor areas.
The purpose of Alternative A is to show how office and hotel growth
could occur if the City largely continues the policies of the current
2005 General Plan, while making minor development allocation and
boundary changes. This specifically includes focusing office allocation
increases within the Heart of the City Corridor, which is the area that can
absorb new office development under the framework of the 2005 General
Plan.
Alternative A does not add additional citywide residential allocation.
However, it does redistribute the existing allocation in order to address
Housing Element requirements. State law requires the City to identify land
suitable to hold its regional fair share of housing for the 2014-2022 time
frame (known as the RHNA allocation). The current RHNA allocation is
1,064, which is below the City’s existing residential allocation (1,895 total).
This alternative meets current RHNA requirements. However, this alterna-
tive does not include enough residential allocations to fully achieve the
One Bay Area target for 2040 (discussed later under Alternatives B and C).
Economic and Fiscal Impacts
This alternative results in additional office and hotel development under
the framework of the current 2005 General Plan. New growth is focused
in the Heart of the City Corridor because this area can most easily accom-
modate new development. While the increased development allocations
would allow for some economic growth in Cupertino, the amount of
new office and hotel development included in Alternative A would have
minimal fiscal benefits to the City. The land use standards in the 2005
General Plan do not facilitate the development of larger corporate head-
quarters or major commercial projects. As a result, Vallco Shopping Mall
would remain the same under this alternative because there is not enough
allocation or economic incentive to redevelop the site.
Corridor Mobility and Design Characteristics
Homestead Corridor: This corridor continues to be a predominantly res-
idential area with a series of low-rise neighborhood commercial centers.
Homestead Road is improved with new pedestrian crossings at the De
Anza Boulevard, Wolfe Road and Tantau Avenue intersections.
North Wolfe Corridor: This corridor remains a key north/south connec-
tion between Cupertino Village and I-280. It is also a key access road for
the new Apple Campus 2 development. Wolfe Road is improved with new
bike lanes and pedestrian crossings at Homestead Road, Vallco Parkway,
Pruneridge Avenue and Stevens Creek Boulevard.
Heart of the City Corridor: This corridor remains the core mixed-use area
in Cupertino, with a series of low- to mid-rise commercial, office, hotel and
residential uses. Stevens Creek Boulevard has improved pedestrian cross-
ings at Stelling Road, De Anza Boulevard and Wolfe Road.
North De Anza Corridor: This corridor remains a predominantly mid-rise
office area between Stevens Creek Boulevard and I-280. De Anza Bou-
levard has additional bike lanes and pedestrian crossings at Homestead
Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard.
27GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION III | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES
Lehigh PermanenteQuarry and LehighHanson Cement Plant City
Hall
De Anza
College
Apple Campus 2280
85
280
280
85
85
85
CUPERTINO
SUNNYVALE
SARATOGA
WEST
VALLEY
SANTA CLARA
··········
Development Allocation
Commercial..........70,000 s.f.
Office....................10,000 s.f.
Hotel.....................125 rooms
Residential............200 units
Homestead Corridor
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
10 (between Blaney and Blue Jay), 20 (between Blue
Jay and De Anza, and north side of Homestead between
De Anza and Franco), 35 (south side of Homestead
between De Anza and Sunnyvale) units per acre
Maximum Height
30 feet, or 45 feet (south side between De Anza and Stelling)
Development Allocation
Commercial..........50,000 s.f.
Office....................30,000 s.f.
Hotel.....................100 rooms
Residential............100 units
North Wolfe Corridor
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
60 feet
Development Allocation
Commercial..........500,000 s.f.
Office....................315,000 s.f.
Hotel.....................375 rooms
Residential............1,000 units
Heart of the City Corridor
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
25 or 35 (South Vallco) units per acre
Maximum Height
45 feet
Development Allocation
Commercial..........10,000 s.f.
Office....................25,000 s.f.
Hotel.....................none
Residential............170 units
North De Anza Corridor
Primary Uses
Office
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
45 feet
Development Allocation
Commercial..........50,000 s.f.
Office....................10,000 s.f.
Hotel.....................none
Residential...........150 units
South De Anza Corridor
Primary Uses
Commercial, Medium-High Density
Residential and Public/Quasi-Public
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
30 feet
Citywide Development Summary
Existing Alternative A Difference
17,113 s.f. 390,000 s.f.
695,629 s.f. 680,000 s.f.
339 rooms 600 rooms
1416 units 1620 units
523,118 s.f. 650,231 s.f.
5,784 s.f. 21,413 s.f.
0 0
479 units 275 units
540,231 s.f. 1,040,231 s.f.
701,413 s.f. 701,413 s.f.
339 rooms 600 rooms
1,895 units 1,895 units
Citywide Development Allocation
Existing Alternative A Difference
17,113 s.f. 390,000 s.f.
695,629 s.f. 680,000 s.f.
339 rooms 600 rooms
1,416 units 1,620 units
523,118 s.f. 650,231 s.f.
5,784 s.f. 21,413 s.f.
0 0
479 units 275 units
540,231 s.f. 1,040,231 s.f.
701,413 s.f. 701,413 s.f.
339 rooms 600 rooms
1,895 units 1,895 units
Major Corridors
Office
Commercial
Hotel
Residential
Other Special Areas*
Office
Commercial
Hotel
Residential
Total
Office
Commercial
Hotel
Residential
+372,887 s.f.
- 15,629 s.f.
+261 rooms
+204 units
+127,113 s.f.
+15,629 s.f.
0
- 204 units
+500,000 s.f.
0
+261 rooms
0
* Includes Bubb Road, Fairgrove, Monta Vista, Oak Valley, Other Neighborhoods, Major Employers
and Other Commercial Centers, as defined in the 2005 General Plan
STEVENS CREEK BLVD
WO
L
F
E
R
D
DE
A
N
Z
A
B
L
V
D
DE
A
N
Z
A
B
L
V
D
HOMESTEAD RD
Stelling Gateway
Primary Uses
Commercial and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
35 units per acre
Maximum Height
30 (west side of Stelling) or 45 (east side of
Stelling) feet
Stevens Creek and 85 Gateway
Primary Uses
Commercial and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
45 feet
North Crossroads Sub Area
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
45 feet
City Center Node
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
45 feet
South Vallco Gateway West
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
35 units per acre
Maximum Height
45 feet, or 60 feet with a retail component
South Vallco Gateway East
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
35 units per acre
Maximum Height
45 feet, or 60 feet with a retail component
North Vallco Gateway
Primary Uses
Commercial and Office
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
60 feet
North De Anza Gateway
Primary Uses
Commercial and Office
Maximum Residential Density
35 units per acre
Maximum Height
45 feet
08001600 2400 Feet
N
Legend
City Boundary
Key Intersections
Alternative A
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION III | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES
28
Alternative B
Themes
• Focus new growth along major mixed-use corridors
• Revise density and height standards at key nodes, gateways
and sub areas along major mixed-use corridors
• Increase office, hotel and residential development
allocations
• Support the redevelopment of the Vallco Shopping District
by reallocating existing commercial allocation
• Streamline General Plan area boundaries
Summary
Alternative B identifies how growth would occur if the City made a series
of key policy changes. This alternative includes increased heights and
residential densities within key nodes, gateways and sub areas. It also
includes an additional 2,000,000 square feet of office allocation (2,540,231
total), 500 hotel rooms (839 total) and 1,421 residential units (3,316 total).
While the diagram does show increased commercial allocation (+642,266
square feet), this would actually come directly from the Vallco Shopping
Mall through its redevelopment and would not be new citywide commer-
cial allocation. Similar to Alternative A, this scenario includes streamlining
the current 2005 General Plan special center boundaries.
The purpose of Alternative B is to show how the City can focus devel-
opment along major mixed-use corridors in order to create more
complete commercial, office and entertainment areas, and to address
mid-term housing needs. This alternative allows Cupertino to build upon
the already established strengths of its major corridors, including pro-
tecting the high visibility and easy access to local businesses. It increases
development allocations at a level above Alternative A in order to better
capture retail sales leakage and regional demand for office development.
Additional height or density in key nodes, gateways and sub areas along
the corridors may be allocated if a development meets certain criteria
(e.g., includes a retail component or provides project-wide benefits).
In addition to land use changes, this alternative includes a broader range
of Complete Streets and transit improvements than those included under
Alternative A. These improvements better connect the major mixed-use
corridors to surrounding residential neighborhoods through bicycle,
pedestrian and intersection improvements. This alternative also includes
studying the proposed Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) line along Stevens Creek
Boulevard, which connects De Anza College and major intersections in
Cupertino to Santa Clara, San Jose and the greater Bay Area.
Similar to Alternative A, this alternative adds additional residential alloca-
tion as part of the Housing Element update. However, it adds 1,421 new
residential allocations that will meet both the current RHNA requirements
and 75 percent of the 2040 One Bay Area targets. As a result, this alterna-
tive better helps the City meet mid-term housing requirements that will be
needed during the next Housing Element update cycle.
Economic and Fiscal Impacts
Alternative B provides more incentives for redeveloping Cupertino’s
major mixed-use corridors because of the increased height limits and
development allocation. This facilitates economic growth and results in
new projects that will provide a stronger fiscal benefit to the City (e.g.,
better retail, office and mixed-use projects). The Vallco Shopping Mall
will be redeveloped into a “retail boulevard” with a mix of office, retail,
hotel and residential uses. In addition to economic and fiscal benefits,
the redevelopment of the Vallco site will provide more retail, service and
entertainment to the Cupertino community.
Corridor Mobility and Design Characteristics
Homestead Corridor: This corridor continues to be a predominantly res-
idential area with a series of low-rise neighborhood commercial centers.
Homestead Road is improved with new pedestrian crossings at De Anza
Boulevard, Blaney Avenue, Wolfe Road and Tantau Avenue.
North Wolfe Corridor: This corridor continues to be a predominantly
office, hotel and residential area with a series of low-rise neighborhood
commercial centers. Wolfe Road includes bike lanes and improved pedes-
trian crossings at Homestead Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard.
Heart of the City Corridor: This corridor remains the core commercial
corridor in Cupertino, with a series of low-, mid- and high-rise commercial
and office uses. It also includes new housing development in a mixed-use
format with retail uses. Stevens Creek Boulevard is improved with new
pedestrian crossings at Mary Avenue, Stelling Road, De Anza Boulevard,
Wolfe Road, Finch Avenue and Tantau Avenue.
In particular, the Vallco Shopping Mall area is redeveloped as a “retail
boulevard” similar to Santana Row in San Jose, with a mix of office, retail,
hotel and residential uses. Wolfe Road includes bike lanes and improved
pedestrian crossings at Homestead Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard. It
also includes housing development in a mixed-use format with retail and/
or office uses.
North De Anza Corridor: This corridor remains a predominantly office
and hotel area with mid- to high-rise buildings from Stevens Creek Bou-
levard to I-280. De Anza Boulevard is improved with new bike lanes and
pedestrian crossings at Stevens Creek Boulevard.
South De Anza South Corridor: This corridor remains a predominantly
general commercial area south of Stevens Creek Boulevard.
29GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION III | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES
Lehigh Permanente
Quarry and LehighHanson Cement Plant City
Hall
De Anza
College
Apple Campus 2280
85
280
280
85
85
85
CUPERTINO
SUNNYVALE
SARATOGA
WEST
VALLEY
SANTA CLARA
Existing Alternative C Difference
17,113 s.f. 2,790,000 s.f.
695,629 s.f. 1,250,000 s.f.
339 rooms 1339 rooms
1416 units 3900 units
523,118 s.f. 750,231 s.f.
5,784 s.f. 93,679 s.f.
0 0
479 units 521 units
540,231 s.f. 3,540,231 s.f.
701,413 s.f. 1,343,679 s.f.
339 rooms 1,339 rooms
1,895 units 4,421 units
··
·
····
·
··
Development Allocation
Commercial..........250,000 s.f.
Office....................25,000 s.f.
Hotel.....................150 rooms
Residential............550 units
Homestead Corridor
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
10 (between Blaney and Blue Jay), 20 (between Blue
Jay and De Anza, and north side of Homestead between
De Anza and Franco), 35 (south side of Homestead
between De Anza and Sunnyvale) units per acre
Maximum Height
30 feet, or 45 feet (south side between De Anza and Stelling)
Development Allocation
Commercial..........100,000 s.f.
Office....................75,000 s.f.
Hotel.....................150 rooms
Residential............230 units
North Wolfe Corridor
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office, Residential
Maximum Residential Density
25 unites per acre
Maximum Height
60 feet
Development Allocation
Commercial..........750,000 s.f.
Office....................1,500,000 s.f.
Hotel.....................439 rooms
Residential............1,570 units
Heart of the City Corridor
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
25 units (35 units South Vallco)
Maximum Height
45 feet
Development Allocation
Commercial..........25,000 s.f.
Office....................200,000 s.f.
Hotel.....................100 rooms
Residential............170 units
North De Anza Corridor
Primary Uses
Office
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
60 feet
Development Allocation
Commercial..........125,000 s.f.
Office....................25,000 s.f.
Hotel.....................none
Residential............301 units
South De Anza Corridor
··
·
·····
·
·
South De Anza Corridor
Citywide Development Allocation
··
·
····
·
··
·
·····
·
·
+ 1,807,887 s.f.
+ 554,371 s.f. **
+ 500 rooms
+ 1,405 units
+ 192,113 s.f.
+ 87,895 s.f. **
0
+ 16 units
+ 2,000,000 s.f.
+ 642,266 s.f. **
+ 500 rooms
+ 1,421 units
Existing Alternative B Difference
17,113 s.f. 1,825,000 s.f.
695,629 s.f. 1,250,000 s.f.
339 rooms 839 rooms
1,416 units 2,821 units
523,118 s.f. 715,231 s.f.
5,784 s.f. 93,679 s.f.
0 0
479 units 495 units
540,231 s.f. 2,540,231 s.f.
701,413 s.f. 1,343,679 s.f.
339 rooms 839 rooms
1,895 units 3,316 units
Primary Uses
Office
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
30 feet
* Includes Bubb Road, Fairgrove, Monta Vista, Oak Valley, Other Neighborhoods and Other
Employment Centers, as defined in the 2005 General Plan
Major Corridors
Office
Commercial
Hotel
Residential
Other Special Areas*
Office
Commercial
Hotel
Residential
Total
Office
Commercial
Hotel
Residential
** Assumes complete Vallco demolition - backfill of existing square footage
STEVENS CREEK BLVD
WO
L
F
E
R
D
DE
A
N
Z
A
B
L
V
D
DE
A
N
Z
A
B
L
V
D
HOMESTEAD RD
Stevens Creek and 85 Gateway
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
45 feet, or 60 feet with a retail component
North Crossroads Sub Area
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
45 feet, or 60 feet with a retail component
City Center Node
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
60 feet, 75 feet with a retail component. = 90
feet with retail and project-wide benefits
South Vallco Gateway West
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
35 units per acre
Maximum Height
45 feet, or 60 feet with a retail component. 75 feet along Stevens Creek Blvd and Wolfe Rd
with retail and project-wide benefits
South Vallco Gateway East
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
35 units per acre
Maximum Height
60 feet, or 75 feet with a retail component. = 110 feet with retail and project-wide
benefits
North Vallco Gateway
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
60 feet, or 75 feet with a retail component
along Wolfe Rd. = 95 feet along Wolfe
Road with retail and project-wide benefits
North De Anza Gateway
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
35 units per acre
Maximum Height
60 feet, or 75 feet with a retail component.
= 95 feet with retail and project-wide benefits
Stelling Gateway
Primary Uses
Commercial and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
35 units per acre
Maximum Height
45 feet, or 60 with a retail component
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
08001600 2400 Feet
N
Alternative B
Legend
City Boundary
BRT Stop
BRT Line
Key Intersections
* Additional height allowances w/ retail
and project-wide benefits
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION III | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES
30
Alternative C
Themes
• Revise density and height standards at key nodes, gateways
and sub areas along major mixed-use corridors
• Increase office, hotel and residential development
allocations
• Support the redevelopment of the Vallco Shopping District
by reallocating existing commercial allocation
• Streamline General Plan area boundaries
Summary
Alternative C identifies how growth would occur if the City used a similar
approach as Alternative B, but focused additional allocation and intensity
to the Vallco Shopping Mall site to allow for its full redevelopment. This
alternative includes increased heights and residential densities within
the South Vallco Gateway West and South Vallco Gateway East areas. It
includes an additional 3,500,000 square feet of office allocation (4,040,231
total), 1,000 hotel rooms (1,339 total) and 2,526 residential units (4,421
total). Similar to Alternatives A and B, it also includes streamlining the
current 2005 General Plan special center boundaries. And similar to Alter-
native B, it assumes that the current commercial allocation at the Vallco
mall could be reused for a new project.
The purpose of Alternative C is to identify a way to transform the
Vallco Shopping Mall into a locally and regionally significant retail,
employment, housing and entertainment destination, and fully
account for long-term housing needs. Under this alternative, the Vallco
area becomes the “downtown” of Cupertino, serving the mixed-use hub
for residents, workers and the larger region. It also increases develop-
ment allocations at a level above both Alternatives A and B in order to
fully capture retail sales leakage and regional demand for office and hotel
development. This alternative also reflects the development intensity
desired by the developers at the study area. Additional height or density
in key nodes, gateways and sub areas on the corridors may be allocated
if a development meets certain criteria (e.g., includes a retail component,
is away from residential neighborhoods or is near freeways) and provides
project-wide benefits.
Similar to Alternative B, this alternative includes the broader range of
Complete Streets and transit improvements, such as bicycle, pedestrian
and intersection improvements and the addition of the proposed Bus
Rapid Transit (BRT) along Stevens Creek Boulevard.
Alternative C also includes updating the Housing Element as required
by State law. Housing Element sites under this alternative would have a
density of 35 units per acre. This alternative also includes an option for an
allocation of 4,421 units (2,526 units more than currently allocated in the
General Plan), to be consistent with 2040 One Bay Area targets.
Economic and Fiscal Impacts
This alternative fully captures current and projected retail sales leakage
and regional demands for office and hotel development. It also promotes
higher intensity development that is more walkable, bikeable and tran-
sit-oriented. This includes changing land use and development standards,
in particular increasing height. As a result of these change, development
potential and incentives are provided at a level that will allow Cupertino to
be more economically competitive with surrounding cities and the larger
South Bay region. This will help attract creative and innovative compa-
nies that will strengthen and diversify both the city’s workforce and fiscal
revenue base. This alternative will also result in significant improvements
to the Vallco Shopping Mall, transforming it into a vibrant and synergistic
downtown mixed-use area for Cupertino.
Corridor Mobility and Design Characteristics
Homestead Corridor: This corridor continues to be a predominantly res-
idential area with a series of low-rise neighborhood commercial centers.
Homestead Road is improved with new pedestrian crossings at De Anza
Boulevard, Blaney Avenue, Wolfe Road and Tantau Avenue.
North Wolfe Corridor: This corridor continues to be a predominantly
office, hotel and residential area with a series of low- to mid-rise neighbor-
hood mixed-use centers. Wolfe Road includes bike lanes and improved
pedestrian crossings at Homestead Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard.
Heart of the City Corridor: This corridor remains the core commercial
corridor in Cupertino, with a series of low- to mid-rise commercial and
mid-to-high rise mixed-use center. It also includes new housing develop-
ment in a mixed-use format with retail uses. Stevens Creek Boulevard is
improved with pedestrian crossings at Mary Avenue, Stelling Road, De
Anza Boulevard, Wolfe Road, Finch Avenue and Tantau Avenue.
In particular, the Vallco Shopping Mall site would be transformed into a
new mixed-use “downtown” for Cupertino. It includes a new network of
side streets, pathways and plazas to support the downtown feel of the
revitalized area.
North De Anza Corridor: This corridor remains a predominantly office
area with many mid-rise buildings. De Anza Boulevard is improved with
new bike lanes and pedestrian crossings at Homestead Road and Stevens
Creek Boulevard.
South De Anza Corridor: This corridor remains a predominantly general
commercial area south of Stevens Creek Boulevard.
31GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION III | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES
Lehigh PermanenteQuarry and LehighHanson Cement Plant City
Hall
De Anza
College
Apple Campus 2280
85
280
280
85
85
85
CUPERTINO
SUNNYVALE
SARATOGA
WEST
VALLEY
SANTA CLARA
··········
100,000 s.f.
200 rooms
200 units
Development Allocation
Commercial..........250,000 s.f.
Office....................50,000 s.f.
Hotel.....................300 rooms
Residential............1,000 units
Homestead Corridor
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
10 (between Blaney and Blue Jay), 20 (between Blue
Jay and De Anza, and north side of Homestead between
De Anza and Franco), 35 (south side of Homestead
between De Anza and Sunnyvale) units per acre
Maximum Height
30 feet, or 45 feet (south side between De Anza and Stelling)
Development Allocation
Commercial..........100,000 s.f.
Office....................90,000 s.f.
Hotel.....................300 rooms
Residential............230 units
North Wolfe Corridor
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
60 feet
Development Allocation
Commercial..........750,000 s.f.
Office....................2,700,000 s.f.
Hotel.....................639 rooms
Residential............2,100 units
Heart of the City Corridor
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
25 or 35 (South Vallco) units per acre
Maximum Height
45 feet
Development Allocation
Commercial..........25,000 s.f.
Office....................400,000 s.f.
Hotel.....................100 rooms
Residential............170 units
North De Anza Corridor
Primary Uses
Office
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
75 feet
Development Allocation
Commercial..........125,000 s.f.
Office....................50,000 s.f.
Hotel.....................none
Residential............400 units
South De Anza Corridor
Primary Uses
Office
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
30 feet
··········
··········South De Anza Corridor
Citywide Development Allocation
Existing Alternative C Difference
17,113 s.f. 3,290,000 s.f.
695,629 s.f. 1,250,000 s.f.
339 rooms 1,339 rooms
1,416 units 3,900 units
523,118 s.f. 750,231 s.f.
5,784 s.f. 93,679 s.f.
0 0
479 units 521 units
540,231 s.f. 4,040,231 s.f.
701,413 s.f. 1,343,679 s.f.
339 rooms 1,339 rooms
1,895 units 4,421 units
Major Corridors
Office
Commercial
Hotel
Residential
Other Special Areas*
Office
Commercial
Hotel
Residential
Total
Office
Commercial
Hotel
Residential
+ 2,772,887 s.f.
+ 554,371 s.f. **
+ 1,000 rooms
+ 2,484 units
+ 227,113 s.f.
+ 87,895 s.f. **
0
+ 42 units
+ 3,500,000 s.f.
+ 642,266 s.f. **
+ 1,000 rooms
+ 2,526 units
* Includes Bubb Road, Fairgrove, Monta Vista, Oak Valley, Other Neighborhoods, Major Employers
and Commercial Centers, as defined in the 2005 General Plan
** Assumes complete Vallco demolition - backfill of existing square footage
STEVENS CREEK BLVD
WO
L
F
E
R
D
DE
A
N
Z
A
B
L
V
D
DE
A
N
Z
A
B
L
V
D
HOMESTEAD RD
North Crossroads Sub Area
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
60 feet, or 75 with a retail component
City Center Node
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
75 feet, or 90 feet with a retail component.
= 110 feet with retail and project-wide
benefits
South Vallco Gateway East
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
35 units per acre
Maximum Height
75 feet or 90 feet with retail. = 160 feet with
retail and project-wide benefits
North Vallco Gateway
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
60 feet, or 75 feet with a retail component.
= 130 feet along Wolfe Rd with retail and
project-wide benefits
North De Anza Gateway
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
35 units per acre
Maximum Height
60 feet, or 75 feet with a retail component.
=145 feet with retail and project-wide
benefits
South Vallco Gateway West
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
35 units per acre
Maximum Height
60 feet, or 75 with a retail component. 85 feet
along Stevens Creek Blvd and Wolfe Rd with
retail and project-wide benefits
Stelling Gateway
Primary Uses
Commercial and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
35 units per acre
Maximum Height
45 feet, or 60 feet with a retail component
Stevens Creek and 85 Gateway
Primary Uses
Commercial, Office and Residential
Maximum Residential Density
25 units per acre
Maximum Height
60 feet, or 75 feet with a retail component
*
**
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
08001600 2400 Feet
N
Legend
City Boundary
BRT Stop
BRT Line
Key Intersections
Alternative C
* Additional height allowances w/ retail
and project-wide benefits
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION III | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES
32
ECONOMIC AND FISCAL PERFORMANCE
A key reason for studying changes to existing land use standards and
policies is to identify ways the City can support economic development
along the major mixed-use corridors in Cupertino. This includes creating
incentives to encourage businesses to upgrade building facades, add new
retail uses or services, and improve sustainability (e.g., new energy efficient
buildings, more local jobs and better transit). More specifically, the City
is interested in helping create a new, successful project within the Vallco
Shopping District that will benefit the community with new retail, enter-
tainment, office and residential uses, resulting in a true “downtown” for
Cupertino.
The City is also interested in ensuring that any changes to the 2005
General Plan result in development projects that both increase tax reve-
nues and also do not harm the City’s fiscal health. These are two important
criteria that need to be addressed to ensure the City can provide ade-
quately provide public facilities and services to the entire community well
into the future.
The table on the following page describes how well each alternative, in rel-
ative, qualitative terms, meets the economic and fiscal performance goals
of the City and community. The table includes a narrative discussion and
the following ranking criteria:
VERY WELL The alternative exceeds the objective
WELL The alternative achieves the objective
GOOD The alternative is neutral
POOR The alternative does not achieve the objective
The Rose Bowl mixed-use project, currently under construction, is adjacent to the
Vallco Shopping District area
A view of the interior of the Vallco Shopping Mall The recently developed Bay Club has been a successful use at the Vallco
Shopping Mall
33GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION III | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES
How Well Does the
Concept Alternative...Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C
Expand local shopping
opportunities?
GOOD. This alternative does not allow for new use land uses, other
than those already included in the current 2005 General Plan.
WELL. This alternative helps to incentivize the development of new
retail in all gateways, nodes and sub areas by increasing permitted
building heights.
VERY WELL. This alternative generally provides higher height limits
than Alternatives A or B, providing greater incentives to increase
the number of retailers and diversify Cupertino’s retail mix.
Meet the expectations of
younger technology
workers who seek a more
“urban” and walkable work
environment?
POOR. This alternative includes limited increases in allocations
(500,000 square feet of office and 261 hotel rooms), which are
insufficient to materially impact the “feel” of Cupertino’s gateways,
nodes and sub areas.
WELL. This alternative increases office, hotel and residential
allocations at a sufficient level to enable development of new
pedestrian-oriented, mixed-use developments.
WELL. This alternative increases office, hotel and residential
allocations to a level that enables development of new pedestri-
an-oriented, mixed-use developments.
Encourage redevelopment
of the Vallco Shopping
Mall?
POOR. The limited increases in development allocation under this
alternative results in a lack of financial incentive to redevelop the
Vallco Shopping Mall.
WELL. This alternative increases development allocation and allows
for new land uses, which provides incentives for the redevelopment
of the Vallco Shopping District.
VERY WELL. This alternative provides a greater level, as compared
to Alternative B, of incentives to Vallco Shopping District property
owners to redevelopment their properties, increasing the overall
likelihood of full revitalization of the mall.
Enhance tax revenues to
the community?
GOOD. This alternative results in minimal enhancement of tax reve-
nues, due to relatively small increases in office and hotel allocation.
WELL. This alternative increases both office and hotel allocation
above the level of Alternative A, which helps generate significant
new property tax and transient occupancy tax revenues. In addition,
incentives for new retail facilities and a redeveloped Vallco Shop-
ping District could result in new sales tax revenue, and increases in
residential allocation generates new property tax revenue and retail
spending in Cupertino.
VERY WELL. This alternative significantly increases both office and
hotel allocation above the level of Alternatives A and B, which will
generate significant new property tax and transient occupancy tax
revenues. In addition, stronger incentives for new retail facilities
and a fully redeveloped Vallco Shopping District could result in new
sales tax revenue, and increases in residential allocation generates
new property tax revenue and retail spending in Cupertino.
Promote a diverse set of
fiscal revenues?
GOOD. This alternative does not allow for new use land uses, other
than those already included in the current 2005 General Plan.
WELL. This alternative results in new lands uses and allocations
developed in a mixed-use development program, which provides a
greater diversity of fiscal revenues compared to a single-use devel-
opment.
WELL. This alternative results in new lands uses and allocations
developed in a mixed-use development program, which provides a
greater diversity of fiscal revenues compared to a single-use devel-
opment.
Maintain the City’s
competitiveness to retain
and attract new retailers
and businesses?
POOR. Over time, lack of redevelopment of aging retail and office
properties could result in a loss of the City’s competitiveness as a
retail and office location under this alternative.
WELL. This alternative provides sufficient office allocation and
incentives for retail to promote redevelopment of some existing
commercial properties, resulting in more contemporary office and
retail facilities.
VERY WELL. This alternative permits a greater level of redevel-
opment of existing aging properties into contemporary facilities
than Alternatives A or B, and includes strong incentives for a major
overhaul of Vallco Shopping District which will attract new retailers
in a mixed-use setting.
Encourage recycling of old-
er properties into state-of-
the-art sustainable projects
that save energy and wa-
ter?
GOOD. Overall, this alternative encourages the status quo with
minimal incentives for property owners to redevelop or revitalize
their properties.
WELL. This alternative increases office and hotel allocations and
incentives for retail, which promotes development of new facilities
that generate overall lower carbon footprint and conserve water
and energy resources.
WELL. This alternative increases office and hotel allocations and
incentives for retail, which promotes development of new facilities
that generate overall lower carbon footprint and conserve water
and energy resources.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION III | CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES
34
Study Area Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C
1. Cupertino Inn and
Goodyear Tire
Remains a hotel (Cupertino Inn) with a new low-rise hotel at the Good-
year Tire site. Maximum height remains unchanged at 45 feet (three to
four stories).
Could include a six to seven story, 200 room hotel with conference
facility on the Goodyear Tire site. Maximum height would be 60 feet
(up to 90 feet if there is a retail component and project-wide benefits
are provided).
Remains a hotel (Cupertino Inn) and new 250-room hotel/conference
facility at the Goodyear Tire site. Maximum height would be 60 feet (up
to 130 feet if there is a retail component and project-wide benefits are
provided).
2. City Center Could include some modest increases in commercial, office and resi-
dential uses. Maximum height remains unchanged at 45 feet (three to
four stories). Maximum residential density remains unchanged at 25
units per acre.
Could include new office and residential uses. Maximum height would
be 60 feet (up to 90 feet if there is a retail component and project-wide
benefits are provided).
Could include a new 500,000 square foot office building with 16,000
square feet of commercial and residential development at 25 units per
acre. Maximum height would be 75 feet (up to 110 feet if there is a
retail component and project-wide benefits are provided).
3. PG&E Remains a public/quasi-public site. Would keep operating its public/quasi-public use. However, the new
General Commercial (CG) designation allows a commercial site that
could support a retail store/center.
Would keep operating its public/quasi-public use. However, the new
General Commercial (CG) designation allows a commercial site that
could support a retail store/center.
4. Mirapath Is rezoned to accommodate light industrial and commercial use.
Maximum height remains unchanged at 35 feet (two to three stories).
Is rezoned to accommodate light industrial and commercial use.
Maximum height remains unchanged at 30 feet (two to three stories).
Is rezoned to accommodate light industrial and commercial use. Maxi-
mum height remains unchanged at 45 feet (three to four stories).
5. Cupertino Village Could include a mix of retail and residential uses. Maximum height
remains unchanged at 45 feet (three to four stories). Maximum residen-
tial density remains unchanged at 25 units per acre.
Could include a redeveloped mixed use hotel, retail and residential
project. Maximum height would be 60 feet (up to 95 feet if it falls within
the North Vallco Gateway area, and there is a retail component and
project-wide benefits are provided).
Could include a redeveloped mixed use hotel, retail and residential
project. Maximum height would be 60 feet (up to 130 feet if it falls with-
in the North Vallco Gateway area, and there is a retail component and
project-wide benefits are provided).
6. Vallco Shopping
District
Could include new low-mid rise office uses or a hotel. Maximum build-
ing height remains unchanged at 45 feet (three to four stories) and 60
feet (four to five stories) with retail below.
Could redevelop the Vallco Shopping Mall as a retail boulevard,
supported by new office and residential uses. Maximum height would
be 45 feet (up to 60 feet if there is a retail component and community
benefits are provided) in South Vallco Gateway West and 60 feet (up
to 110 feet if there is a retail component and community benefits are
provided) in South Vallco Gateway East.
Could include a major redesign of the Vallco Mall area to create a
true downtown for Cupertino. Uses would include commercial, office,
residential, public/quasi-public and hotel. Maximum height would be
60 feet (up to 85 feet if there is a retail component and project-wide
benefits are provided) in South Vallco Gateway West and 75 feet (up
to 160 feet if there is a retail component and project-wide benefits are
provided) in South Vallco Gateway East.
7. Stevens Creek
Office Center
Could include additional office, commercial, hotel and residential uses.
Maximum height remains unchanged at 45 feet (three to four stories).
Maximum residential density remains unchanged at 25 units per acre.
Could include expanded office and commercial development.
Maximum height would remain unchanged 45 feet.
Could include new hotel, commercial and residential mixed-use devel-
opment. Maximum heights would be 60 feet (up to 75 feet if there is a
retail component and project-wide benefits are provided).
STUDY AREA POTENTIAL PROJECTS
The following table identifies potential projects that could be proposed at
each of the seven project Study Areas based on the land use, height and
development allocation included under each Concept Alternative. While
these are potential projects, individual property owners may choose to
propose a different project so long as it is consistent with the General Plan.
It is important the General Plan itself does not approve or entitle any
specific project. Property owners have control over when and if they wish
to propose a project, and final decisions are made on a case-by-case basis
by City staff and/or the Planning Commission and City Council through a
public review process.
IV. Next Steps
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION IV | NEXT STEPS
36
Continuing the DiscussionThe Concept Alternatives presented in this report are designed to
be the starting point for a more focused community discussion
on how the major mixed-use corridors in Cupertino might change
during the next 26 years (2014-2040). Over the next few months, the com-
munity, study area stakeholders, City Commissioners and City Council
members will review, discuss and refine the draft Concept Alternatives.
On March 4, 2014, the City Council will provide direction on a preferred
alternative that will become the basis for preparing a draft General Plan
Amendment.
STAY INVOLVED!
The project website is the community’s portal for all information and
documents related to the General Plan Amendment and Housing Element
Update. This includes recent news, upcoming events, a project schedule,
maps and documents. On the website you can also submit any comments
or questions you have regarding the project, and enter your email address
to receive periodic project email notifications.
NEAR-TERM PUBLIC MEETINGS AND
STUDY SESSIONS
The City will hold a series of public workshops and study sessions in early
2014 to discuss and refine the draft Concept Alternatives. All workshops
and study sessions are scheduled to be held at the Cupertino Community
Hall. Please note that meeting dates, times and locations are subject to
change, so please check the project website often for updates.
Planning Commission Open House and Study Session
February 19, 2014, starting at 6:30 p.m.
Topic: General Plan Amendment Concept Alternatives Report presentation
and discussion, and Housing Element policy and sites discussion
City Council Study Session
March 4, 2014, starting at 3:00 p.m.
Topic: General Plan Amendment Concept Alternatives Report presentation
and discussion, and Housing Element policy and sites discussion
Environmental Scoping Meeting
March 11, 2014, starting at 5:00 p.m.
Topic: General Plan Amendment and Housing Element Environmental
scoping discussion
City Council and Planning Commission Study Session
April 1, 2014, starting at 3:00 p.m.
Topic: Draft General Plan Amendment concepts and discussion
A group discussing ideas during the Neighborhood Meeting
Participants completing the Vallco Shopping District mapping exercise during
Community-wide Workshop #2
www.cupertinogpa.org
37GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION IV | NEXT STEPS
SOURCES
Project Documents
(all project documents are available at: www.cupertinogpa.org)
Community-wide Workshop #1 Summary, July 2013.
Corridor Mobility and Design Concepts Input Summary, February 2014.
Market Study, February 2014.
Settings and Opportunities Report, September 2013.
Other Documents and Reports
City of Cupertino, Citywide Geographical Information System (GIS), 2013.
City of Cupertino, General Plan 2000–2020, adopted November 2005.
City of Cupertino, General Plan Amendment Settings and Opportunities Report,
September 2013.
City of Cupertino, Heart of the City Specific Plan, adopted January 2012
City of Cupertino, North Vallco Master Plan, 2007.
City of Cupertino, South Vallco Master Plan, 2008.
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Bus Rapid Transit Strategic Plan, May 2009.
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Valley Transportation Plan 2040 Fact Sheet,
February 2013.
Online Resources
City of Cupertino: www.cupertino.org
Cupertino Union School District: www.edline.net/pages/Cupertino_Union_SD
Santa Clara County Assessor’s Parcel Database: www.sccassessor.org
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority: www.vta.org
Stevens Creek Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project: www.vta.org/stevens-creek-brt
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
City Council
Gilbert Wong, Mayor
Rod Sinks, Vice Mayor
Barry Chang, Council Member
Orrin Mahoney, Council Member
Mark Santoro, Council Member
Planning Commission
Don Sun, Chair
Paul Brophy, Vice Chair
Alan Takahashi, Commissioner
Margaret Gong, Commissioner
Winnie Lee, Commissioner
City Staff
David Brandt, City Manager
Colleen Winchester, Assistant City Attorney
Aarti Shrivastava, Community Development Director
Gary Chao, Assistant Director of Community Development
Piu Ghosh, Senior Planner
Christopher Valenzuela, Senior Planner
George Schroeder, Associate Planner
Simon Vuong, Associate Planner
Diana Pancholi, Assistant Planner
Angela Tsui, Economic Development Manager
Timm Borden, Public Works Director
Julia Kinst, Administrative Assistant
Beth Ebben, Administrative Assistant
Workshop Support
Aki Honda Snelling
Alex Wykoff
Andrea Sanders
Alyssa Carlsen
Chad Mosley
Cheri Donnelly
Chylene Osborne
Colleen Lettire
Donna Henriques
Erin Cooke
Erwin Ching
Grace Schmidt
Hella Sanders
Jeff Greef
Kaitie Groeneweg
Kirsten Squarcia
Kristina Alfaro
Louis Sarmiento
Melissa Names
Melissa Tronquet
Michelle Combs
Pete Coglianese
Rei Delgado
Robert Kim
Ron Bullock
Ryan Roman
Stephen Rose
Sylvia Mendez
Tiffanie Cardenas
Winnie Pagan
Consultant Team
Daniel Iacofano, MIG
Chris Beynon, MIG
Dan Amsden, MIG
Laura Stetson, MIG
Genevieve Sharrow, MIG
Jeff Liljegren, MIG
Marissa Reilly, MIG
Janet Smith-Heimer, BAE Urban Economics
David Shiver, BAE Urban Economics
Ray Kennedy, BAE Urban Economics
Stephanie Hagar, BAE Urban Economics
David Greensfelder, Greensfelder CRE
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES REPORT
SECTION IV | NEXT STEPS
38
www.cupertinogpa.org
Ju
l
y
1
8
,
2
0
1
3
|
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
-
W
I
D
E
W
O
R
K
S
H
O
P
#
1
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
Wo
r
k
s
h
o
p
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
Wo
r
k
s
h
o
p
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
On
J
u
l
y
1
8
,
2
0
1
3
,
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
ho
s
t
e
d
a
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
wo
r
k
s
h
o
p
t
o
k
i
c
k
o
f
f
t
h
e
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
pr
o
j
e
c
t
.
Th
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
n
ex
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
di
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
o
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’
s
mo
b
i
l
i
t
y
,
u
r
b
a
n
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
a
n
d
i
d
e
a
s
.
Wo
r
k
s
h
o
p
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
In
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
t
o
c
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
t
o
p
i
c
s
,
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
a
l
s
o
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
op
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
s
e
v
e
n
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
S
t
u
d
y
A
r
e
a
s
i
t
e
s
.
Wo
r
k
s
h
o
p
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
Ov
e
r
4
5
e
n
g
a
g
e
d
p
e
o
p
l
e
at
t
e
n
d
e
d
t
h
e
w
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
a
n
d
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
f
e
e
d
b
a
c
k
on
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’
s
m
a
n
y
a
s
s
e
t
s
,
ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
a
n
d
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
.
Th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
i
s
a
s
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
bo
t
h
t
h
e
w
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
a
n
d
t
h
e
in
p
u
t
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
Wo
r
k
s
h
o
p
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
Th
e
w
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
b
e
g
a
n
w
i
t
h
a
we
l
c
o
m
e
f
r
o
m
M
a
y
o
r
O
r
r
i
n
Ma
h
o
n
e
y
a
n
d
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
A
a
r
t
i
Sh
r
i
v
a
s
t
a
v
a
.
T
h
i
s
w
a
s
fo
l
l
o
w
e
d
b
y
a
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
ov
e
r
v
i
e
w
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
g
i
v
e
n
by
D
a
n
i
e
l
I
a
c
o
f
a
n
o
o
f
M
I
G
,
th
e
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
w
o
r
k
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
th
e
C
i
t
y
o
n
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
Th
e
w
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
v
i
d
e
o
a
n
d
pr
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
r
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
at
:
ww
w
.
c
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
g
p
a
.
o
r
g
Fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
t
h
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
w
e
r
e
d
i
v
i
d
e
d
in
t
o
s
i
x
t
a
b
l
e
s
a
n
d
a
s
k
e
d
t
o
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
a
n
d
a
n
s
w
e
r
t
h
e
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
t
h
r
e
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
:
Wo
r
k
s
h
o
p
O
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
1.
W
h
a
t
k
e
y
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
,
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
o
r
s
o
c
i
a
l
a
s
s
e
t
s
he
l
p
d
e
f
i
n
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
a
n
d
n
e
e
d
t
o
b
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
th
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
?
2.
W
h
a
t
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
m
o
b
i
l
i
t
y
,
u
r
b
a
n
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
r
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
Pl
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
?
3.
W
h
a
t
f
u
t
u
r
e
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
e
x
p
l
o
r
e
d
a
s
th
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
p
l
a
n
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
n
e
x
t
1
5
t
o
2
0
y
e
a
r
s
?
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
I
n
p
u
t
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
I
n
p
u
t
Wo
r
k
s
h
o
p
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
a
w
e
a
l
t
h
o
f
t
h
o
u
g
h
t
s
,
id
e
a
s
a
n
d
p
e
r
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
t
h
r
e
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
.
T
h
e
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
i
s
a
s
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
t
h
e
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
n
p
u
t
,
fo
l
l
o
w
e
d
b
y
d
e
t
a
i
l
e
d
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
s
f
r
o
m
e
a
c
h
g
r
o
u
p
t
a
b
l
e
.
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
I
n
p
u
t
–A
s
s
e
t
s
Th
e
k
e
y
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
,
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
n
d
s
o
c
i
a
l
a
s
s
e
t
s
th
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
to
b
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
:
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’
s
g
r
e
a
t
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
l
i
f
e
Th
e
d
i
v
e
r
s
e
a
n
d
m
u
l
t
i
c
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Th
e
e
x
c
e
l
l
e
n
t
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
a
n
d
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
So
l
i
d
m
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
Na
t
u
r
a
l
b
e
a
u
t
y
Lo
w
c
r
i
m
e
Th
e
b
i
k
e
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Go
o
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
f
l
o
w
Re
s
p
o
n
s
i
v
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
o
r
k
s
a
n
d
g
r
e
a
t
p
u
b
l
i
c
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Go
o
d
C
i
t
y
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
Go
o
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
j
o
b
s
a
n
d
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
Ov
e
r
a
l
l
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
Fa
r
m
e
r
s
’
m
a
r
k
e
t
s
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
I
n
p
u
t
–
C
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
Th
e
m
o
s
t
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
m
o
b
i
l
i
t
y
,
u
r
b
a
n
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
c
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
f
e
l
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
ad
d
r
e
s
s
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
:
Po
o
r
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
u
r
b
a
n
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
i
n
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
i
n
ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
,
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
a
n
d
c
o
l
o
r
s
Sm
a
l
l
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
In
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
C
i
t
y
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
pr
o
c
e
s
s
La
c
k
o
f
l
a
t
e
n
i
g
h
t
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
Un
r
e
l
i
a
b
l
e
C
i
t
y
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
t
r
e
a
m
No
c
l
e
a
r
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
f
o
r
h
o
w
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
s
h
o
u
l
d
g
r
o
w
o
r
ch
a
n
g
e
i
n
t
h
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
Ne
e
d
n
e
w
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
Sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
y
a
d
d
i
n
g
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
La
c
k
o
f
i
n
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
s
i
g
n
a
g
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
Ba
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
,
p
a
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
l
y
a
l
o
n
g
B
u
b
b
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
D
e
An
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
La
c
k
o
f
p
u
b
l
i
c
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
a
n
d
b
i
k
i
n
g
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
Po
o
r
a
i
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
La
c
k
o
f
p
a
r
k
s
Co
n
c
e
r
n
t
h
a
t
g
r
o
w
t
h
w
i
l
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
,
w
h
i
c
h
a
r
e
at
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
Ne
e
d
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
a
s
e
n
s
e
o
f
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
s
t
h
e
ci
t
y
g
r
o
w
s
La
c
k
o
f
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
g
r
o
c
e
r
y
s
t
o
r
e
s
a
n
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
ga
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
s
p
a
c
e
s
t
o
s
e
r
v
e
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
I
n
p
u
t
–
C
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
(c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
I
n
p
u
t
–
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
Ma
j
o
r
f
u
t
u
r
e
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
f
e
l
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
be
e
x
p
l
o
r
e
d
a
s
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
p
l
a
n
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
n
e
x
t
1
5
t
o
20
y
e
a
r
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
:
Cr
e
a
t
i
n
g
m
o
r
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Im
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
Cr
e
a
t
i
n
g
m
o
r
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
Ad
d
i
n
g
a
m
u
s
e
u
m
Cr
e
a
t
i
n
g
m
o
r
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
g
a
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
s
p
a
c
e
s
Im
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
s
i
g
n
a
l
t
i
m
i
n
g
a
t
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
e
x
p
a
n
d
i
n
g
ma
s
s
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
Al
l
o
w
i
n
g
f
o
o
d
t
r
u
c
k
s
a
n
d
m
o
b
i
l
e
v
e
n
d
o
r
s
Re
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
r
e
c
r
u
i
t
i
n
g
g
o
o
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
i
n
g
c
r
e
a
t
i
v
e
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
s
Es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
i
n
g
C
i
t
y
-
s
c
h
o
o
l
-
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
y
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
s
Im
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
C
i
t
y
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
Cr
e
a
t
i
n
g
s
e
n
i
o
r
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
c
h
o
i
c
e
s
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
i
n
g
h
i
g
h
e
r
-
e
n
d
s
t
o
r
e
s
a
t
V
a
l
l
c
o
M
a
l
l
Re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
o
l
d
e
r
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
a
n
d
a
r
e
a
s
Im
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
b
o
t
h
s
o
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
th
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
I
n
p
u
t
–
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
(c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Ta
b
l
e
#
1
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
s
Ta
b
l
e
#
1
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
s
Im
p
r
o
v
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
t
i
m
i
n
g
fo
r
b
e
t
t
e
r
f
l
o
w
Co
n
t
r
o
l
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
Di
v
e
r
s
i
f
y
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
c
r
e
a
t
e
be
t
t
e
r
d
a
t
a
o
n
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
ho
u
s
i
n
g
n
e
e
d
s
Bu
i
l
d
m
o
r
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
Al
l
o
w
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
h
e
i
g
h
t
f
o
r
sc
h
o
o
l
s
t
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
h
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
of
f
i
c
e
s
p
a
c
e
f
o
r
h
o
m
e
g
r
o
w
n
co
m
p
a
n
i
e
s
t
o
h
e
l
p
t
h
e
m
ex
p
a
n
d
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
e
h
o
m
e
g
r
o
w
n
co
m
p
a
n
i
e
s
s
o
t
h
e
y
c
a
n
g
e
t
go
o
d
r
e
n
t
a
l
r
a
t
e
s
Be
a
b
l
e
t
o
r
e
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
r
e
c
r
u
i
t
co
m
p
a
n
i
e
s
In
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
u
r
b
a
n
a
n
d
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
de
s
i
g
n
(
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
I
n
n
)
In
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
an
d
h
e
i
g
h
t
s
f
o
r
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
/
h
o
m
e
s
Po
o
r
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
u
s
e
s
(h
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
s
,
m
a
j
o
r
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
,
De
A
n
z
a
a
n
d
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
)
In
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
f
l
o
w
i
n
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
co
l
o
r
s
To
o
m
u
c
h
b
u
r
e
au
c
r
a
c
y
a
n
d
ov
e
r
-
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
e
.
g
.
,
L
E
E
D
,
AB
3
2
)
w
h
i
c
h
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
h
e
c
o
s
t
of
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
To
o
m
a
n
y
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
To
o
m
a
n
y
n
a
r
r
o
w
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
(e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
c
h
o
k
e
r
st
r
e
e
t
s
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
ha
s
s
l
e
)
No
t
a
l
o
t
o
f
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
(g
o
o
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
f
l
o
w
a
n
d
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
)
Go
o
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
a
n
d
pr
i
v
a
t
e
s
h
u
t
t
l
e
s
At
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
si
g
n
a
g
e
a
n
d
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
ch
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
It
f
e
e
l
s
g
o
o
d
d
r
i
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
st
r
e
e
t
s
Re
s
p
o
n
s
i
v
e
c
i
t
y
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
(p
o
l
i
c
e
a
n
d
f
i
r
e
)
Go
o
d
b
i
k
e
l
a
n
e
s
o
n
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
an
d
a
n
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
b
i
k
e
f
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Th
e
C
i
t
y
d
o
e
s
a
g
o
o
d
j
o
b
di
s
c
o
u
r
a
g
i
n
g
b
l
i
g
h
t
Pa
r
k
s
a
r
e
w
e
l
l
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
,
a
n
d
mu
l
t
i
-
u
s
e
p
a
r
k
s
s
e
r
v
e
t
h
e
en
t
i
r
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Opportunities
Ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
As
s
e
t
s
Ta
b
l
e
#
1
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
s
(c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Ke
e
p
u
p
w
i
t
h
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
ne
e
d
s
(
e
.
g
.
,
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
c
e
l
l
ph
o
n
e
s
i
g
n
a
l
s
)
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
m
o
b
i
l
e
f
o
o
d
t
r
u
c
k
s
an
d
m
o
b
i
l
e
v
e
n
d
o
r
s
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
Vallco Mall to
im
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
a
n
d
qu
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
r
e
t
a
i
l
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
d
d
i
n
g
a
s
e
n
i
o
r
ce
n
t
e
r
o
n
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
28
0
n
e
a
r
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
No
t
e
n
o
u
g
h
e
m
p
h
a
s
i
s
o
n
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
c
e
s
s
Ne
e
d
b
e
t
t
e
r
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
wi
t
h
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
ae
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
s
No
t
h
i
n
g
t
o
d
o
i
n
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
a
t
ni
g
h
t
Po
o
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
f
l
o
w
a
n
d
s
i
g
n
a
l
ti
m
i
n
g
,
w
h
i
c
h
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
i
n
l
o
n
g
wa
i
t
s
Go
o
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
i
n
g
a
n
d
fe
s
t
i
v
a
l
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
Pa
r
k
s
a
n
d
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
D
e
A
n
z
a
Co
l
l
e
g
e
Go
o
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
th
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
(
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
c
c
e
s
s
te
l
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
,
w
e
b
s
i
t
e
,
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
Sc
e
n
e
,
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
C
o
u
r
i
e
r
a
n
d
ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
m
a
i
l
i
n
g
s
)
w
h
i
c
h
re
s
u
l
t
s
i
n
a
w
e
l
l
-
i
n
f
o
r
m
e
d
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Lo
t
s
o
f
s
e
n
i
o
r
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
So
m
e
g
o
o
d
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
p
l
a
c
e
s
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
f
a
r
m
e
r
s
’
m
a
r
k
e
t
s
On
e
o
f
t
h
e
b
e
s
t
l
i
b
r
a
r
i
e
s
Ac
c
e
s
s
t
o
g
o
o
d
j
o
b
s
a
n
d
ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
Fu
l
l
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
c
i
t
y
Opportunities
Ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
As
s
e
t
s
Ta
b
l
e
#
2
R
e
p
o
n
s
e
s
Ta
b
l
e
#
2
R
e
p
o
n
s
e
s
Im
p
r
o
v
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
a
l
l
fo
r
m
s
Ho
l
d
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
a
b
o
u
t
s
a
f
e
t
y
Ex
p
a
n
d
h
i
g
h
s
p
e
e
d
i
n
t
e
r
n
e
t
an
d
W
i
F
i
c
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
Cr
e
a
t
e
p
o
c
k
e
t
p
a
r
k
s
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
sm
a
l
l
e
r
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
s
p
a
c
e
s
En
h
a
n
c
e
c
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
v
e
n
u
e
s
an
d
/
o
r
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
n
o
w
th
a
t
m
a
y
b
e
u
n
d
e
r
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
d
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
C
i
t
y
-
s
c
h
o
o
l
-
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
y
pa
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
In
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
D
e
A
n
z
a
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
st
u
d
e
n
t
s
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
i
n
t
e
r
n
s
h
i
p
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
wi
t
h
A
p
p
l
e
La
c
k
o
f
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
-
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
an
d
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
Ne
e
d
b
e
t
t
e
r
p
a
y
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
C
i
t
y
st
a
f
f
r
e
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
To
o
m
u
c
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
r
o
u
n
d
sc
h
o
o
l
s
,
e
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
l
y
i
n
t
h
e
t
r
i
-
sc
h
o
o
l
a
r
e
a
Ne
e
d
t
o
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
h
o
w
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
ca
n
g
r
o
w
a
n
d
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
c
h
a
n
g
i
n
g
/
a
g
i
n
g
La
c
k
o
f
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
l
o
c
a
l
h
e
a
l
t
h
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
La
c
k
o
f
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
s
p
a
c
e
s
a
n
d
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
f
o
r
s
e
n
i
o
r
s
Ne
e
d
t
o
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
gr
o
w
i
n
g
s
u
b
u
r
b
a
n
a
r
e
a
To
o
m
u
c
h
p
r
e
s
s
u
r
e
o
n
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
sc
h
o
o
l
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
La
c
k
o
f
s
c
h
o
o
l
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Be
i
n
g
t
h
e
h
e
a
d
q
u
a
r
t
e
r
s
o
f
Ap
p
l
e
c
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
Gr
e
a
t
p
a
r
k
s
a
n
d
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
In
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
f
l
a
v
o
r
o
f
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
an
d
m
u
l
t
i
-
c
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
in
v
o
l
v
e
m
e
n
t
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
t
r
e
e
t
g
r
i
d
l
a
y
o
u
t
Go
o
d
C
i
t
y
s
t
a
f
f
r
e
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
Go
o
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
n
v
o
l
v
e
m
e
n
t
Th
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
re
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
Gr
e
a
t
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
Wa
l
k
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
f
o
r
y
o
u
n
g
a
n
d
o
l
d
pe
o
p
l
e
Opportunities
Ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
As
s
e
t
s
Ta
b
l
e
#
2
R
e
p
o
n
s
e
s
(c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Pl
a
n
t
m
o
r
e
t
r
e
e
s
Fi
n
d
c
r
e
a
t
i
v
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
b
u
i
l
d
an
d
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
Cr
e
a
t
e
u
r
b
a
n
g
a
r
d
e
n
s
t
h
a
t
c
a
n
be
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
sc
h
o
o
l
s
Cr
e
a
t
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
a
l
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
f
o
r
se
n
i
o
r
s
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
m
o
r
e
b
u
s
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
al
o
n
g
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
En
h
a
n
c
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
co
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
To
o
m
a
n
y
t
e
a
c
h
e
r
l
a
y
o
f
f
s
No
t
e
n
o
u
g
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
a
t
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
Ma
l
l
La
c
k
o
f
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
To
o
m
u
c
h
e
m
p
h
a
s
i
s
o
n
ma
n
d
a
t
e
d
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
,
ne
e
d
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
Un
s
a
f
e
b
i
k
e
l
a
n
e
s
Ne
e
d
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
tr
a
n
s
i
t
Ne
e
d
t
o
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
wi
t
h
t
h
e
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
s
Ne
e
d
t
o
r
e
t
a
i
n
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
l
i
f
e
du
r
i
n
g
d
i
f
f
i
c
u
l
t
t
i
m
e
s
Hi
g
h
c
o
s
t
f
o
r
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
La
c
k
o
f
d
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
Ne
e
d
a
t
o
w
n
s
q
u
a
r
e
w
i
t
h
su
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
t
Go
o
d
w
e
a
t
h
e
r
A
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
t
h
a
t
i
s
o
p
e
n
a
n
d
ac
c
e
p
t
i
n
g
Go
o
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
Go
o
d
s
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
In
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
r
e
p
u
t
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
sm
a
l
l
t
o
w
n
f
e
e
l
Se
n
i
o
r
c
e
n
t
e
r
De
A
n
z
a
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
Qu
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
l
i
f
e
Opportunities
Ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
As
s
e
t
s
Ta
b
l
e
#
2
R
e
p
o
n
s
e
s
(c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
La
c
k
o
f
p
r
o
s
p
e
r
i
t
y
a
t
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
Ma
l
l
To
o
m
u
c
h
t
r
u
c
k
d
u
s
t
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
qu
a
r
r
y
To
o
m
u
c
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
,
wh
i
c
h
c
a
u
s
e
s
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
s
w
i
t
h
bi
c
y
c
l
e
s
Co
s
t
o
f
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
i
s
t
o
o
ex
p
e
n
s
i
v
e
i
n
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
Ne
e
d
t
o
f
i
n
d
a
w
a
y
t
o
b
u
i
l
d
hi
g
h
e
r
w
i
l
l
e
n
s
u
r
i
n
g
i
t
r
e
m
a
i
n
s
at
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
On
l
y
a
o
n
e
c
o
m
p
a
n
y
t
o
w
n
Ne
e
d
m
o
r
e
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
w
i
t
h
em
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
La
c
k
o
f
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
f
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
e
s
La
c
k
o
f
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
i
n
c
u
b
a
t
o
r
s
Opportunities
Ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
As
s
e
t
s
Ta
b
l
e
#
2
R
e
p
o
n
s
e
s
(c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Ex
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
t
h
e
f
t
ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
Po
o
r
W
i
F
i
a
n
d
c
a
b
l
e
La
c
k
o
f
p
o
c
k
e
t
p
a
r
k
s
Mo
n
s
t
e
r
h
o
m
e
s
Po
o
r
l
y
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
Ne
e
d
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
re
v
e
n
u
e
s
t
r
e
a
m
Opportunities
Ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
As
s
e
t
s
Ta
b
l
e
#
3
R
e
p
o
n
s
e
s
Ta
b
l
e
#
3
R
e
p
o
n
s
e
s
Ex
p
a
n
d
f
a
r
m
e
r
’
s
m
a
r
k
e
t
s
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
h
e
a
l
t
h
y
f
o
o
d
op
t
i
o
n
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
p
r
o
d
u
c
e
a
t
De
A
n
z
a
f
l
e
a
m
a
r
k
e
t
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
m
o
r
e
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
t
o
r
e
s
s
o
pe
o
p
l
e
d
o
n
’
t
h
a
v
e
t
o
d
r
i
v
e
f
a
r
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
a
h
e
a
l
t
h
y
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
n
d
t
a
k
e
ad
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
o
f
t
h
e
g
o
o
d
we
a
t
h
e
r
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
i
n
g
af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
Va
l
l
c
o
S
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
Re
d
u
c
e
f
o
s
s
i
l
f
u
e
l
e
n
e
r
g
y
Cr
e
a
t
e
a
n
A
p
p
l
e
m
u
s
e
u
m
o
r
Te
c
h
M
u
s
e
u
m
Di
v
e
r
s
i
f
y
r
e
t
a
i
l
s
t
o
r
e
s
(
m
o
r
e
hi
g
h
e
n
d
s
t
o
r
e
s
)
Im
p
r
o
v
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
To
o
m
u
c
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
t
h
e
t
r
i
-
sc
h
o
o
l
a
n
d
D
e
A
n
z
a
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
ar
e
a
s
Ne
e
d
g
o
o
d
-
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
a
n
d
w
e
l
l
-
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
fo
r
l
o
c
a
l
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
s
Ov
e
r
c
r
o
w
d
i
n
g
a
t
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
Ne
e
d
S
m
a
r
t
G
r
o
w
t
h
t
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
sc
h
o
o
l
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
w
i
t
h
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
ho
u
s
i
n
g
Po
o
r
a
i
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
n
e
a
r
L
e
h
i
g
h
Qu
a
r
r
y
Re
v
e
n
u
e
o
v
e
r
l
y
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
o
n
Ap
p
l
e
Li
m
i
t
e
d
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
f
o
r
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Ne
e
d
m
o
r
e
p
a
r
k
s
No
t
e
n
o
u
g
h
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
n
e
ar
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
Sc
h
o
o
l
s
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
Lo
w
c
r
i
m
e
r
a
t
e
Go
o
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
Va
l
u
e
s
Ru
r
a
l
a
m
b
i
e
n
c
e
(
s
e
t
t
i
n
g
ag
a
i
n
s
t
t
h
e
h
i
l
l
s
)
Li
b
r
a
r
y
(
l
e
c
t
u
r
e
c
l
u
b
s
a
n
d
wo
n
d
e
r
f
u
l
l
i
b
r
a
r
i
a
n
s
)
Hi
g
h
-
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
j
o
b
s
Sa
n
A
n
t
o
n
i
o
R
a
n
c
h
o
p
e
n
sp
a
c
e
a
r
e
a
Bl
a
c
k
b
e
r
r
y
F
a
r
m
Mc
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
a
n
c
h
Bi
k
e
a
b
l
e
a
n
d
f
l
a
t
(
n
o
t
y
e
t
b
i
k
e
fr
i
e
n
d
l
y
)
De
A
n
z
a
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
Opportunities
Ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
As
s
e
t
s
Ta
b
l
e
#
3
R
e
p
o
n
s
e
s
(c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Pe
r
f
o
r
m
i
n
g
a
r
t
s
Pl
a
n
e
t
a
r
i
u
m
Fl
e
a
m
a
r
k
e
t
Di
v
e
r
s
e
e
a
t
i
n
g
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
(v
i
s
i
t
o
r
s
l
i
k
e
t
h
i
s
)
Ma
n
y
s
m
a
l
l
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
Op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
s
Sp
o
r
t
s
c
e
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
Y
M
C
A
Pl
a
y
i
n
g
f
i
e
l
d
s
a
n
d
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
s
p
o
r
t
s
Sm
a
l
l
p
a
r
k
s
Ap
p
l
e
(
t
o
u
r
i
s
t
d
r
a
w
)
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
v
a
l
u
e
s
He
a
l
t
h
y
C
i
t
y
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
(
p
o
l
i
c
e
,
pa
v
e
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
,
go
o
d
o
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
)
Ci
t
y
d
o
e
s
a
g
o
o
d
j
o
b
t
a
l
k
i
n
g
ab
o
u
t
i
s
s
u
e
s
Opportunities
Ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
As
s
e
t
s
Ta
b
l
e
#
4
R
e
p
o
n
s
e
s
Ta
b
l
e
#
4
R
e
p
o
n
s
e
s
Cr
e
a
t
e
m
o
r
e
p
a
r
k
s
Sp
e
n
d
m
o
n
e
y
o
n
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
a
l
th
i
n
g
s
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
o
t
h
e
r
f
o
r
m
s
o
f
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
Re
d
u
c
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
Im
p
r
o
v
e
b
u
s
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
Re
d
i
r
e
c
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
f
l
o
w
Hi
r
e
m
o
r
e
c
r
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
g
u
a
r
d
s
Co
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
n
d
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
Im
p
r
o
v
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
M
a
l
l
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
ei
t
h
e
r
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
m
i
x
e
d
-
us
e
,
h
i
g
h
e
r
e
n
d
s
t
o
r
e
s
l
i
k
e
Sa
n
t
a
n
a
R
o
w
,
o
r
t
h
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
of
a
n
o
u
t
l
e
t
m
a
l
l
In
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
S
t
u
d
y
A
r
e
a
s
i
t
e
s
i
n
t
o
th
e
c
i
t
y
a
n
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
Po
o
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
n
e
a
r
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
a
l
o
n
g
Bu
b
b
R
o
a
d
Ba
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
f
e
t
y
a
n
d
a
la
c
k
o
f
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
St
r
e
e
t
s
a
r
e
b
l
o
c
k
e
d
o
f
f
No
t
e
n
o
u
g
h
s
c
h
o
o
l
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
Un
d
e
r
p
e
r
f
o
r
m
i
n
g
V
a
l
l
c
o
M
a
l
l
Un
s
a
f
e
t
o
b
i
k
e
t
o
w
o
r
k
o
r
sc
h
o
o
l
Sc
h
o
o
l
s
Em
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Sa
f
e
t
y
Re
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
Pa
r
k
s
Yo
u
t
h
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
Mo
v
i
e
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
s
Opportunities
Ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
As
s
e
t
s
Ta
b
l
e
#
4
R
e
p
o
n
s
e
s
(c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
)
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
be
t
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
o
f
f
i
c
e
us
e
s
(
n
o
t
j
u
s
t
A
p
p
l
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
)
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
,
wh
i
l
e
a
l
s
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
pr
o
m
o
t
e
s
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
/
b
i
k
i
n
g
t
o
wo
r
k
(
n
e
a
r
A
p
p
l
e
)
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
g
r
e
e
n
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
Opportunities
Ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
As
s
e
t
s
Ta
b
l
e
#
5
R
e
p
o
n
s
e
s
Ta
b
l
e
#
5
R
e
p
o
n
s
e
s
Cr
e
a
t
e
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
s
e
a
t
i
n
g
c
a
f
e
s
an
d
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
,
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
ga
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
t
o
b
r
i
n
g
pe
o
p
l
e
t
o
g
e
t
h
e
r
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
c
o
n
d
o
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
t
o
su
p
p
o
r
t
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
En
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
F
l
i
n
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
Zo
n
e
f
o
r
s
e
n
i
o
r
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
Cr
e
a
t
e
m
o
r
e
s
o
c
i
a
l
e
v
e
n
t
s
t
o
im
p
r
o
v
e
s
o
c
i
a
l
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Ne
e
d
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
s
e
n
s
e
o
f
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
i
m
e
s
o
f
co
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
g
r
o
w
t
h
La
c
k
o
f
s
o
c
i
a
l
h
a
r
m
o
n
y
a
n
d
un
i
t
y
(
n
e
e
d
i
n
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
s
i
g
n
a
g
e
i
n
mu
l
t
i
p
l
e
l
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
s
Ne
e
d
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
Ma
l
l
To
o
m
u
c
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
t
h
e
t
r
i
-
sc
h
o
o
l
a
r
e
a
Cr
o
w
d
e
d
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
w
i
t
h
n
o
l
a
n
d
to
b
u
i
l
d
m
o
r
e
.
.
.
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
a
r
e
li
m
i
t
i
n
g
g
r
o
w
t
h
Ne
e
d
t
o
d
e
a
l
w
i
t
h
g
r
o
w
t
h
de
m
a
n
d
s
(
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
,
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
ho
u
s
i
n
g
,
h
i
g
h
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
)
Co
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
i
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
(
e
.
g
.
,
co
m
p
a
n
y
c
a
t
e
r
i
n
g
)
Fl
e
a
m
a
r
k
e
t
Fa
r
m
e
r
s
’
m
a
r
k
e
t
(
t
w
o
i
s
o
k
)
Fo
u
r
t
h
o
f
J
u
l
y
f
i
r
e
w
o
r
k
s
Sc
h
o
o
l
s
Li
b
r
a
r
y
(
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
n
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
f
o
r
m
o
r
e
pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
)
Pa
r
k
a
n
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
Go
l
f
c
o
u
r
s
e
s
(
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
s
o
p
e
n
sp
a
c
e
s
)
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
s
i
z
e
s
Opportunities
Ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
As
s
e
t
s
Ta
b
l
e
#
6
R
e
p
o
n
s
e
s
Ta
b
l
e
#
6
R
e
p
o
n
s
e
s
Cr
e
a
t
e
m
o
r
e
d
o
g
p
a
r
k
s
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
o
t
h
e
r
m
o
d
e
s
o
f
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
d
b
i
k
e
r
o
u
t
e
s
Im
p
r
o
v
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
f
o
r
c
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
Cr
e
a
t
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
g
a
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
p
l
a
c
e
s
wi
t
h
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
r
t
t
o
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
a
se
n
s
e
o
f
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Im
p
r
o
v
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
s
a
l
o
n
g
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
At
t
r
a
c
t
m
a
j
o
r
g
r
o
c
e
r
y
s
t
o
r
e
s
an
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
r
e
t
a
i
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
in
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
M
a
i
n
St
r
e
e
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
Ex
p
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
Ex
p
a
n
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
ch
a
r
g
i
n
g
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
Cr
e
a
t
e
h
i
g
h
e
r
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
o
f
f
i
c
e
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
To
o
m
a
n
y
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
f
r
o
m
th
e
M
a
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
La
c
k
o
f
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
t
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
No
l
a
n
d
m
a
r
k
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
Lo
s
s
o
f
m
a
j
o
r
g
r
o
c
e
r
y
s
t
o
r
e
Li
m
i
t
e
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
i
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
s
(
l
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
b
a
r
r
i
e
r
s
)
La
c
k
o
f
s
h
o
p
s
a
t
V
a
l
l
c
o
M
a
l
l
La
c
k
o
f
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
li
k
e
s
w
i
m
m
i
n
g
p
o
o
l
s
,
ba
d
m
i
n
t
o
n
c
o
u
r
t
s
,
e
t
c
.
Hi
g
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
d
u
e
t
o
A
p
p
l
e
Ca
m
p
u
s
2
La
c
k
o
f
p
u
b
l
i
c
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Pa
r
k
s
Sc
h
o
o
l
s
Em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
Fa
r
m
e
r
s
’
m
a
r
k
e
t
Ap
p
l
e
Mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
Si
g
n
a
g
e
i
n
l
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
s
o
t
h
e
r
th
a
n
E
n
g
l
i
s
h
Opportunities
Ch
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
s
As
s
e
t
s
Next Steps
Ne
x
t
S
t
e
p
s
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
n
p
u
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
u
s
e
d
b
y
th
e
C
i
t
y
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
t
h
e
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
vi
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
v
e
st
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
Am
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
Th
i
s
i
n
p
u
t
w
i
l
l
a
l
s
o
b
e
u
s
e
d
t
o
de
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
i
t
i
a
l
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
fo
r
t
h
e
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
S
t
u
d
y
A
r
e
a
s
i
t
e
s
,
wh
i
c
h
w
i
l
l
b
e
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
a
n
d
ev
a
l
u
a
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
ne
x
t
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
w
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
,
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
f
o
r
Oc
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
3
.
Vi
s
i
t
t
h
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
W
e
b
s
i
t
e
St
a
y
i
n
f
o
r
m
e
d
!
Th
e
C
i
t
y
h
a
s
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
a
we
b
s
i
t
e
t
h
a
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
t
h
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
’
s
p
o
r
t
a
l
f
o
r
a
l
l
pr
o
j
e
c
t
-
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
r
e
c
e
n
t
n
e
w
s
,
up
c
o
m
i
n
g
e
v
e
n
t
s
,
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
,
ma
p
s
a
n
d
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
.
Pl
e
a
s
e
v
i
s
i
t
t
h
e
w
e
b
s
i
t
e
a
t
:
ww
w
.
c
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
g
p
a
.
o
r
g
1
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
op #2, October 23, 2013
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
,
December 5, 2013
Ch
a
m
b
e
r
o
f
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
e
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
,
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s Meeting, January 29, 2014
On
l
i
n
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
S
u
r
v
e
y
,
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
3
–
January 2014
MO
B
I
L
I
T
Y
A
N
D
D
E
S
I
G
N
C
O
N
C
E
P
T
S
I
N
P
U
T
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
2
Co
n
t
e
n
t
s
I.
Ov
e
r
v
i
e
w
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
3
II
.
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
S
u
r
v
e
y
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
…
.
.
…
…
…
1
4
II
I
.
Ma
j
o
r
M
i
x
e
d
-
U
s
e
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
…
…
…
…
29
IV
.
Va
l
l
c
o
M
a
p
p
i
n
g
E
x
e
r
c
i
s
e
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
…
…
…
…
…
.
3
9
V.
Ne
x
t
S
t
e
p
s
…
.
.
.
.
.
.
…
…
.
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
…
9
1
3I. Overview
4
Ov
e
r
v
i
e
w
In
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
0
1
3
,
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
be
g
a
n
t
h
e
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
p
h
a
s
e
of
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
Am
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
T
h
i
s
p
a
r
t
of
t
h
e
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
v
o
l
v
e
d
ex
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
o
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
an
d
e
n
g
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
.
Th
e
C
i
t
y
h
o
s
t
e
d
f
o
u
r
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
w
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
s
a
n
d
me
e
t
i
n
g
s
t
o
s
o
l
i
c
i
t
i
n
p
u
t
o
n
fu
t
u
r
e
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
,
h
e
i
g
h
t
,
mo
b
i
l
i
t
y
a
n
d
u
r
b
a
n
d
e
s
i
g
n
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
5
Ov
e
r
v
i
e
w
Du
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
e
w
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
s
a
n
d
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
,
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
al
s
o
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
t
h
e
i
r
i
d
e
a
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
o
f
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
Sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
M
a
l
l
a
n
d
l
a
r
g
e
r
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
.
6
Ov
e
r
v
i
e
w
Ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
1
7
0
p
e
o
p
l
e
at
t
e
n
d
e
d
o
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
fo
u
r
w
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
s
/
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
:
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
Oc
t
o
b
e
r
2
3
,
2
0
1
3
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
3
Ch
a
m
b
e
r
o
f
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
’
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
7
Ov
e
r
v
i
e
w
|
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
On
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
2
3
,
2
0
1
4
,
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
ho
s
t
e
d
a
w
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
t
h
a
t
n
e
a
r
l
y
5
0
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
a
t
t
e
n
d
e
d
.
Th
e
w
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
a
n
in
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
Su
r
v
e
y
(
r
e
a
l
-
t
i
m
e
k
e
y
p
a
d
p
o
l
l
i
n
g
)
an
d
a
h
a
n
d
s
-
o
n
V
a
l
l
c
o
M
a
p
p
i
n
g
Ex
e
r
c
i
s
e
,
w
h
i
c
h
f
o
c
u
s
e
d
o
n
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
c
h
a
n
g
e
a
t
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
Sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
.
8
Ov
e
r
v
i
e
w
|
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
On
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
5
,
2
0
1
3
,
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
me
t
w
i
t
h
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
gr
o
u
p
s
t
o
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
d
e
a
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
ma
j
o
r
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
i
n
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
(
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
,
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
,
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
an
d
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
)
.
Si
m
i
l
a
r
t
o
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
Wo
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
,
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
a
l
s
o
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
M
a
p
p
i
n
g
Ex
e
r
c
i
s
e
.
9
Ov
e
r
v
i
e
w
|
Ch
a
m
b
e
r
o
f
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
e
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
On
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
9
,
2
0
1
4
,
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
m
e
t
w
i
t
h
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
o
f
th
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
o
f
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
e
t
o
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
d
e
a
s
fo
r
t
h
e
m
a
j
o
r
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
a
n
d
t
o
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
t
h
e
Va
l
l
c
o
M
a
p
p
i
n
g
E
x
e
r
c
i
s
e
.
10
Ov
e
r
v
i
e
w
|
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
La
t
e
r
t
h
a
t
e
v
e
n
i
n
g
,
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
m
e
t
w
i
t
h
o
v
e
r
6
0
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
t
o
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
d
e
a
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
ma
j
o
r
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
a
n
d
t
o
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
Ma
p
p
i
n
g
E
x
e
r
c
i
s
e
.
11
Ov
e
r
v
i
e
w
|
On
l
i
n
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
S
u
r
v
e
y
In
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
f
o
u
r
wo
r
k
s
h
o
p
s
,
a
n
o
n
l
i
n
e
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
of
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
Su
r
v
e
y
a
n
d
V
a
l
l
c
o
M
a
p
p
i
n
g
Ex
e
r
c
i
s
e
w
a
s
m
a
d
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
to
a
l
l
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
.
A
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
7
8
p
e
o
p
l
e
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
t
h
e
o
n
l
i
n
e
s
u
r
v
e
y
be
t
w
e
e
n
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
1
3
an
d
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
4
.
12
Ov
e
r
v
i
e
w
|
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
Be
c
a
u
s
e
t
h
e
w
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
s
,
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
o
n
l
i
n
e
s
u
r
v
e
y
la
r
g
e
l
y
c
o
v
e
r
e
d
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
e
x
e
r
c
i
s
e
s
,
t
h
e
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
i
s
a
co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
s
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
in
p
u
t
re
c
e
i
v
e
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
i
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
Am
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
13
Ov
e
r
v
i
e
w
|
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
R
e
s
u
l
t
s
So
m
e
c
o
m
m
o
n
t
h
e
m
e
s
t
h
a
t
w
e
r
e
r
e
p
e
a
t
e
d
b
y
m
a
n
y
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
:
Fu
t
u
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
s
h
o
u
l
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
be
n
e
f
i
t
s
a
n
d
n
o
t
i
m
p
a
c
t
p
u
b
l
i
c
/
q
u
a
s
i
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
,
i
n
p
a
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
sc
h
o
o
l
s
Ca
r
e
f
u
l
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
n
e
e
d
s
t
o
b
e
t
a
k
e
n
f
o
r
a
n
y
n
e
w
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
e
r
m
s
o
f
i
t
s
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
,
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
t
y
p
e
(
e
.
g
.
,
s
i
n
g
l
e
fa
m
i
l
y
h
o
m
e
s
,
s
e
n
i
o
r
h
o
u
s
i
n
g,
a
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
o
r
c
o
n
d
o
s
)
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
h
e
i
g
h
t
s
c
o
u
l
d
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
y
a
r
e
n
o
t
ad
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
m
o
b
i
l
i
t
y
n
e
e
d
s
t
o
b
e
e
x
p
a
n
d
e
d
an
d
m
a
d
e
s
a
f
e
r
Th
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
Sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
h
ou
l
d
b
e
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
o
r
r
e
-
te
n
a
n
t
e
d
t
o
m
a
k
e
i
t
m
o
r
e
e
c
o
n
o
m
ic
a
l
l
y
s
u
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
r
a
b
l
e
t
o
th
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
14
II
.
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
S
u
r
v
e
y
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
15
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
S
u
r
v
e
y
|
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
Th
e
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
De
s
i
g
n
S
u
r
v
e
y
w
a
s
t
o
t
e
s
t
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
,
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
mo
b
i
l
i
t
y
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
f
o
r
e
a
c
h
m
a
j
o
r
mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
i
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
Th
e
s
u
r
v
e
y
w
a
s
c
o
m
p
r
i
s
e
d
o
f
th
r
e
e
m
a
j
o
r
c
a
t
e
g
o
r
i
e
s
:
St
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
s
a
n
d
M
o
b
i
l
i
t
y
En
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
Pa
r
k
s
a
n
d
P
l
a
z
a
s
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
s
16
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
S
u
r
v
e
y
|
In
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
Un
d
e
r
e
a
c
h
c
a
t
e
g
o
r
y
,
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
w
e
r
e
s
h
o
w
n
a
s
e
r
i
e
s
o
f
im
a
g
e
s
a
n
d
a
s
k
e
d
t
o
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
t
o
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
:
1.
Do
y
o
u
l
i
k
e
t
h
i
s
i
d
e
a
f
o
r
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
?
2.
Wh
e
r
e
w
o
u
l
d
i
t
b
e
m
o
s
t
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
?
17
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
S
u
r
v
e
y
|
Su
m
m
a
r
y
Th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
p
a
g
e
s
s
h
o
w
t
h
e
c
o
m
b
i
n
e
d
s
u
m
m
a
r
y
of
a
l
l
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
S
u
r
v
e
y
.
Th
e
s
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
e
v
e
r
y
o
n
e
w
h
o
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
du
r
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
a
n
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
th
e
o
n
l
i
n
e
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
(
hi
g
h
e
s
t
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
s
hi
g
h
l
i
g
h
t
e
d
i
n
b
l
u
e
).
18
Re
s
u
l
t
s
|
St
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
a
n
d
M
o
b
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Ti
t
l
e
Im
a
g
e
Re
s
u
l
t
s
Ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Gr
e
e
n
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
an
d
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
pl
a
n
t
e
r
s
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
5
0
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
7
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
9
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
4
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
8
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
8
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
7
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
2
4
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
4
3
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
1
1
%
)
Hi
g
h
l
y
v
i
s
i
b
l
e
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
5
1
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
5
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
1
1
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
3
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
4
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
1
2
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
7
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
1
4
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
5
4
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
1
1
%
)
Wi
d
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
wi
t
h
s
e
a
t
i
n
g
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
5
9
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
2
4
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
1
3
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
3
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
6
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
2
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
7
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
1
6
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
1
9
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
1
1
%
)
Ou
t
d
o
o
r
d
i
n
i
n
g
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
5
5
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
2
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
8
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
3
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
4
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
8
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
1
2
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
3
1
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
2
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
1
2
%
)
19
Re
s
u
l
t
s
|
St
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
a
n
d
M
o
b
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Ti
t
l
e
Im
a
g
e
Re
s
u
l
t
s
Ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Ar
t
a
n
d
p
l
a
y
Sp
a
c
e
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
9
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
6
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
6
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
8
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
1
6
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
7
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
8
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
1
5
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
1
6
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
9
%
)
Sh
a
r
e
d
b
i
k
e
la
n
e
/
s
h
a
r
r
o
w
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
3
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
2
2
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
4
3
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
3
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
1
2
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
5
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
1
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
8
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
2
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
4
2
%
)
Se
p
a
r
a
t
e
b
i
k
e
la
n
e
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
4
3
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
6
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
1
9
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
3
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
9
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
9
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
3
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
1
2
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
4
6
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
2
1
%
)
Se
p
a
r
a
t
e
d
b
i
k
e
pa
t
h
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
0
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
4
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
1
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
7
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
1
4
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
8
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
5
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
1
0
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
1
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
2
%
)
20
Re
s
u
l
t
s
|
St
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
a
n
d
M
o
b
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Ti
t
l
e
Im
a
g
e
Re
s
u
l
t
s
Ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
En
h
a
n
c
e
d
B
u
s
Sh
e
l
t
e
r
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
4
3
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
2
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
1
9
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
7
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
3
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
6
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
0
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
1
9
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
5
4
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
1
8
%
)
Bu
s
R
a
p
i
d
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
1
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
2
8
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
5
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
1
6
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
3
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
3
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
1
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
2
7
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
7
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
2
8
%
)
21
Re
s
u
l
t
s
|
Pa
r
k
s
a
n
d
P
l
a
z
a
s
Ti
t
l
e
Im
a
g
e
Re
s
u
l
t
s
Ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
Pa
r
k
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
5
5
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
2
9
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
9
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
6
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
1
7
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
1
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
4
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
6
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
4
6
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
2
6
%
)
Ch
i
l
d
r
e
n
p
l
a
y
sp
a
c
e
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
4
4
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
8
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
1
5
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
3
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
1
7
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
5
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
4
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
5
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
3
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
4
%
)
Sm
a
l
l
P
l
a
z
a
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
4
8
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
4
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
1
4
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
4
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
5
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
1
4
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
1
0
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
1
7
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
4
0
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
1
6
%
)
Pa
r
k
l
e
t
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
7
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
2
5
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
6
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
1
2
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
7
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
5
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
5
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
1
2
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
8
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
4
%
)
22
Re
s
u
l
t
s
|
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
U
s
e
s
Ti
t
l
e
Im
a
g
e
Re
s
u
l
t
s
Ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Tr
a
i
l
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
4
9
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
1
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
1
2
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
8
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
1
1
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
1
0
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
6
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
5
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
4
8
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
2
0
%
)
Lo
w
r
i
s
e
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
w
i
t
h
pa
r
k
i
n
g
i
n
f
r
o
n
t
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
7
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
3
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
9
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
1
1
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
6
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
7
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
2
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
1
1
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
4
5
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
0
%
)
Lo
w
r
i
s
e
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
w
i
t
h
sm
a
l
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
se
t
b
a
c
k
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
3
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
5
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
2
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
1
0
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
4
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
3
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
2
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
2
2
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
4
5
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
2
3
%
)
Lo
w
r
i
s
e
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
w
i
t
h
st
r
e
e
t
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
7
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
7
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
0
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
7
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
1
2
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
6
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
4
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
1
0
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
5
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
2
%
)
23
Re
s
u
l
t
s
|
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
U
s
e
s
Ti
t
l
e
Im
a
g
e
Re
s
u
l
t
s
Ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Mi
d
r
i
s
e
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
5
0
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
1
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
1
7
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
2
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
3
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
5
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
2
3
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
1
6
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
2
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
2
3
%
)
Mi
d
r
i
s
e
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
4
7
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
2
4
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
0
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
8
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
4
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
4
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
2
6
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
1
5
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
1
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
2
0
%
)
Mi
d
r
i
s
e
i
n
d
o
o
r
sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
m
a
l
l
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
6
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
0
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
7
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
6
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
1
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
0
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
4
0
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
6
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
1
3
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
4
1
%
)
24
Re
s
u
l
t
s
|
Of
f
i
c
e
U
s
e
s
Ti
t
l
e
Im
a
g
e
Re
s
u
l
t
s
Ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Lo
w
r
i
s
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
1
8
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
8
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
7
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
8
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
1
3
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
7
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
5
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
6
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
2
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
7
%
)
Mi
d
r
i
s
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
6
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
0
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
8
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
6
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
4
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
1
4
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
1
3
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
1
2
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
4
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
2
4
%
)
Mi
d
r
i
s
e
m
i
x
e
d
us
e
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
4
3
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
0
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
2
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
4
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
1
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
9
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
6
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
1
3
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
4
2
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
2
7
%
)
Hi
g
h
r
i
s
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
7
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
2
6
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
4
4
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
4
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
3
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
1
2
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
6
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
1
5
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
2
5
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
9
%
)
25
Re
s
u
l
t
s
|
Ho
t
e
l
U
s
e
s
Ti
t
l
e
Im
a
g
e
Re
s
u
l
t
s
Ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Lo
w
/
m
i
d
r
i
s
e
ho
t
e
l
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
8
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
4
1
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
5
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
6
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
1
0
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
8
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
1
5
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
9
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
6
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
2
3
%
)
Mi
d
r
i
s
e
h
o
t
e
l
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
0
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
5
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
8
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
7
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
4
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
1
6
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
8
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
5
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
4
3
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
2
5
%
)
Mi
d
/
h
i
g
h
r
i
s
e
ho
t
e
l
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
6
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
2
4
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
5
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
6
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
4
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
9
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
1
7
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
1
1
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
2
5
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
3
%
)
26
Re
s
u
l
t
s
|
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
U
s
e
s
Ti
t
l
e
Im
a
g
e
Re
s
u
l
t
s
Ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
De
t
a
c
h
e
d
to
w
n
h
o
m
e
s
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
7
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
1
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
3
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
8
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
2
7
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
4
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
2
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
4
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
2
3
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
9
%
)
Lo
w
r
i
s
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
1
9
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
5
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
4
0
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
6
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
2
0
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
0
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
4
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
5
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
0
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
4
1
%
)
Mi
x
e
d
u
s
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
re
t
a
i
l
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
8
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
2
7
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
1
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
4
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
2
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
2
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
1
1
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
1
2
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
4
8
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
2
6
%
)
Mi
d
r
i
s
e
m
i
x
e
d
us
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
an
d
r
e
t
a
i
l
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
8
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
3
1
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
7
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
4
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
1
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
2
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
1
6
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
1
5
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
4
1
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
2
4
%
)
27
Re
s
u
l
t
s
|
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
U
s
e
s
Ti
t
l
e
Im
a
g
e
Re
s
u
l
t
s
Ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Mi
d
r
i
s
e
m
i
x
e
d
-
us
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
4
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
2
4
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
4
0
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
4
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
6
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
3
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
1
0
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
9
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
5
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
7
%
)
Mi
d
/
h
i
g
h
r
i
s
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
o
f
t
s
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
3
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
2
3
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
3
3
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
1
1
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
2
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
5
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
1
1
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
9
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
4
3
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
2
9
%
)
Mi
d
/
h
i
g
h
r
i
s
e
mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
re
t
a
i
l
I
r
e
a
l
l
y
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
2
9
%
)
Wo
r
t
h
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
g
(
1
9
%
)
I
d
o
n
’
t
l
i
k
e
i
t
(
4
2
%
)
No
t
s
u
r
e
(
1
0
%
)
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
(
2
%
)
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
1
%
)
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
(
1
1
%
)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
(
8
%
)
Al
l
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
3
1
%
)
No
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
(
4
6
%
)
28
Re
s
u
l
t
s
|
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
r
a
i
s
e
d
m
a
n
y
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
De
s
i
g
n
S
u
r
v
e
y
a
t
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
.
T
h
e
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
w
a
l
l
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
c
a
p
t
u
r
e
s
t
h
e
s
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
.
29
II
I
.
M
a
j
o
r
M
i
x
e
d
-
U
s
e
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
I
n
p
u
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
30
Ma
j
o
r
M
i
x
e
d
-
U
s
e
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
|
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
As
a
s
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
S
u
r
v
e
y
,
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
a
t
t
h
e
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
Me
e
t
i
n
g
,
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
o
f
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
e
Me
e
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
Le
a
d
e
r
s
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
a
br
a
i
n
s
t
o
r
m
i
n
g
e
x
e
r
c
i
s
e
f
o
r
e
a
c
h
o
f
th
e
m
a
j
o
r
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
.
31
Ma
j
o
r
M
i
x
e
d
-
U
s
e
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
|
In
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
w
e
r
e
a
n
s
w
e
r
e
d
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
fo
r
e
a
c
h
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
:
Th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
a
r
e
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
s
u
m
m
a
r
i
e
s
f
r
o
m
e
a
c
h
gr
o
u
p
.
Ar
e
t
h
e
r
e
m
o
b
i
l
i
t
y
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
h
a
t
n
e
e
d
t
o
b
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
d
(
c
a
r
,
bi
k
e
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
o
r
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
)
?
Sh
o
u
l
d
t
h
e
r
e
b
e
n
e
w
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
?
Wo
u
l
d
i
t
b
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
t
o
c
h
a
n
g
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
c
a
l
e
o
r
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
?
Wh
a
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
t
h
e
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
/
a
e
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
s
o
f
f
u
t
u
r
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
lo
o
k
l
i
k
e
?
32
Ta
b
l
e
A
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
33
Ta
b
l
e
B
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
34
Ta
b
l
e
C
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
35
Ta
b
l
e
D
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
36
Ta
b
l
e
A
(C
h
a
m
b
e
r
o
f
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
e
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
37
Ta
b
l
e
B
(C
h
a
m
b
e
r
o
f
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
e
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
38
Wa
l
l
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
R
e
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
39
IV
.
V
a
l
l
c
o
M
a
p
p
i
n
g
E
x
e
r
c
i
s
e
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
40
Va
l
l
c
o
M
a
p
p
i
n
g
E
x
e
r
c
i
s
e
|
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
f
o
r
t
h
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
o
f
t
h
e
Va
l
l
c
o
S
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
s
a
k
e
y
co
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
Am
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
To
s
o
l
i
c
i
t
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
n
p
u
t
a
n
d
id
e
a
s
,
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
a
n
in
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
m
a
p
p
i
n
g
e
x
e
r
c
i
s
e
t
h
a
t
al
l
o
w
e
d
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
fu
t
u
r
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
A
t
o
t
a
l
o
f
2
4
g
r
o
u
p
s
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
a
pl
a
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
o
f
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
Sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
.
41
Va
l
l
c
o
M
a
p
p
i
n
g
E
x
e
r
c
i
s
e
|
In
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
Ea
c
h
g
r
o
u
p
h
a
d
a
m
a
p
o
f
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
Sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
a
n
d
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
mo
b
i
l
i
t
y
c
h
i
p
s
a
n
d
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
b
l
o
c
k
s
.
Th
e
g
r
o
u
p
s
w
e
r
e
a
s
k
e
d
t
o
a
n
s
w
e
r
th
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
o
n
“
Wh
a
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
t
h
e
Va
l
l
c
o
S
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
b
e
c
o
m
e
”
by
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
n
g
a
t
h
r
e
e
-
d
i
m
e
n
s
i
o
n
a
l
pl
a
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
e
n
t
i
r
e
s
i
t
e
.
42
Va
l
l
c
o
M
a
p
p
i
n
g
E
x
e
r
c
i
s
e
|
Co
m
m
o
n
T
h
e
m
e
s
Ma
j
o
r
c
o
m
m
o
n
t
h
e
m
e
s
t
h
a
t
c
a
m
e
f
r
o
m
t
h
i
s
ex
e
r
c
i
s
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
c
r
e
a
t
i
n
g
:
Th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
i
s
a
s
u
m
m
a
r
y
o
f
e
a
c
h
g
r
o
u
p
’
s
Va
l
l
c
o
S
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
m
a
p
,
b
r
o
k
e
n
d
o
w
n
b
y
th
e
f
o
u
r
w
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
s
a
n
d
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
s
.
A
s
u
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
“
d
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
”
fo
r
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
w
i
t
h
ma
n
y
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
u
s
e
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
p
a
r
k
s
An
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
f
o
c
u
s
e
d
m
a
l
l
w
i
t
h
g
o
o
d
tr
a
n
s
i
t
a
n
d
b
i
k
e
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
Ta
l
l
e
r
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
h
o
t
e
l
u
s
e
s
o
n
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
s
i
d
e
,
cl
o
s
e
r
t
o
t
h
e
f
r
e
e
w
a
y
43
Ta
b
l
e
1
I
d
e
a
s
(C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
)
•
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
•
Br
e
a
k
-
u
p
t
h
e
m
a
i
n
m
a
l
l
w
i
t
h
ou
t
s
i
d
e
/
i
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
•
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
•
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
h
o
t
e
l
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
44
In
d
o
o
r
a
n
d
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
Co
v
e
r
e
d
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
At
r
i
u
m
/
c
o
u
r
t
y
a
r
d
Re
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
o
n
t
h
e
se
c
o
n
d
f
l
o
o
r
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
ad
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
c
e
n
t
e
r
No
r
e
t
a
i
l
d
e
l
i
v
e
r
y
Si
n
g
l
e
s
t
o
r
y
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
Ke
e
p
S
e
a
r
s
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
an
d
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
Keep JCPenneyNew four story hotel
Ta
b
l
e
1
I
d
e
a
s
(C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
)
45
Ta
b
l
e
2
I
d
e
a
s
(C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
“G
u
t
V
a
l
l
c
o
M
a
l
l
”
•
Hi
d
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
•
De
v
e
l
o
p
a
“
M
a
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
”
aesthetic
on
W
o
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
•
Th
r
e
e
s
t
o
r
i
e
s
•
Tr
a
n
s
f
o
r
m
i
n
t
o
a
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
r
e
t
a
i
l
an
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
46
“M
a
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
”
at
m
o
s
p
h
e
r
e
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
h
i
d
d
e
n
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
in
t
e
r
i
o
r
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
Re
t
a
i
l
l
i
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
i
n
n
e
r
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
Gr
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
t
o
b
u
f
f
e
r
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
f
r
o
m
r
e
t
a
i
l
Hi
g
h
-
r
i
s
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
al
o
n
g
o
u
t
e
r
b
o
u
n
d
a
r
y
t
o
bu
f
f
e
r
s
o
u
n
d
Residential High-rise office on exterior Concentrated retail
Hi
g
h
-
r
i
s
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
La
r
g
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
pr
e
s
e
n
c
e
Ta
b
l
e
2
I
d
e
a
s
(C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
)
47
Ta
b
l
e
3
I
d
e
a
s
(C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
t
o
S
a
n
t
a
n
a
R
o
w
•
Gr
e
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
•
Re
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
•
Bi
k
e
-
f
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
•
Am
p
h
i
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
48
Co
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
e
d
r
e
t
a
i
l
o
f
al
l
s
c
a
l
e
s
Gr
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
t
o
b
u
f
f
e
r
s
t
r
e
e
t
fr
o
m
r
e
t
a
i
l
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
p
a
t
h
s
Co
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
e
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
Gr
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
La
r
g
e
-
s
c
a
l
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Greenways along Wolfe Road Multi-family residences buffered from retail by neighborhood park Retail on street corners Wide Outdoor seating Concentration of offices
Ta
b
l
e
3
I
d
e
a
s
(C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
)
49
Ta
b
l
e
4
I
d
e
a
s
(C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
Hi
g
h
-
r
i
s
e
,
b
i
g
b
o
x
r
e
t
a
i
l
•
Ni
g
h
t
c
l
u
b
s
•
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
•
Hi
g
h
-
r
i
s
e
a
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
50
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
Mu
l
t
i
-
s
t
o
r
y
m
i
x
u
s
e
w
i
t
h
of
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
r
e
t
a
i
l
s
p
a
c
e
In
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
o
f
p
l
a
z
a
In
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
/
s
p
a
c
e
f
o
r
a
f
a
r
m
e
r
s
’
ma
r
k
e
t
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Gr
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
b
u
f
f
e
r
s
p
a
c
e
be
t
w
e
e
n
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
Th
r
e
e
s
t
o
r
y
r
e
t
a
i
l
Mixed-use office and retail space Greenways and a neighborhood park Community services Night Club Greenways Pedestrian Pathways
Ta
b
l
e
4
I
d
e
a
s
(C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
)
51
Ta
b
l
e
5
I
d
e
a
s
(C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
Fi
v
e
t
o
e
i
g
h
t
s
t
o
r
i
e
s
•
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
b
o
v
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
•
Un
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
•
Ho
t
e
l
•
Hi
g
h
-
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
•
Gr
e
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
s
n
e
a
r
f
r
e
e
w
a
y
s
•
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
A
M
C
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
52
Mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Gr
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
a
l
o
n
g
o
u
t
e
r
ed
g
e
o
f
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
Th
r
e
e
s
t
o
r
y
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
,
mu
l
t
i
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
of
f
i
c
e
s
a
n
d
r
e
t
a
i
l
Co
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
e
d
gr
e
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
Office uses
Hi
g
h
-
r
i
s
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Mixed-use, multi-family
wi
t
h
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
t
a
i
l
Ho
t
e
l Greenway
Ta
b
l
e
5
I
d
e
a
s
(C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
)
53
Ta
b
l
e
6
I
d
e
a
s
(C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
Im
p
r
o
v
e
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
a
n
d
m
o
b
i
l
i
t
y
•
Im
p
r
o
v
e
g
r
e
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
s
•
Si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
a
s
p
a
t
h
w
a
y
s
t
o
r
e
t
a
i
l
•
Re
t
a
i
l
a
l
o
n
g
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
•
Ad
d
g
r
e
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
s
o
n
t
o
p
o
f
pa
r
k
i
n
g
g
a
r
a
g
e
s
54
Im
p
r
o
v
e
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
Fl
e
x
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
Bi
k
e
a
n
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
Im
p
r
o
v
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
w
a
l
k
w
a
y
s
In
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
pa
t
h
w
a
y
s
a
n
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
Re
t
a
i
l
Green roofs on retail center Pedestrian pathways Greenways buffer street
fr
o
m
r
e
t
a
i
l Bike paths
Ta
b
l
e
6
I
d
e
a
s
(C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
)
No changes
55
Ta
b
l
e
7
I
d
e
a
s
(C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
Im
p
r
o
v
e
c
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
a
l
l
m
o
d
e
s
•
Ne
w
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
•
Hi
g
h
e
r
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
•
Hi
g
h
r
i
s
e
h
o
t
e
l
a
n
d
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
n
e
a
r
fr
e
e
w
a
y
•
St
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
d
g
r
o
w
t
h
56
Ne
w
p
a
t
h
w
a
y
s
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
Sm
a
l
l
s
c
a
l
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
Mu
l
t
i
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
Of
f
i
c
e
s
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
o
n
e
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
of
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
In
d
o
o
r
/
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
h
y
b
r
i
d
m
a
l
l
La
r
g
e
s
c
a
l
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
o
n
i
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
o
n
e
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
o
f
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
Greenways buffer district
fr
o
m
f
r
e
e
w
a
y High rise hotel
Hi
g
h
r
i
s
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Gr
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
b
u
f
f
e
r
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
f
r
o
m
f
r
e
e
w
a
y
Large park High-rise office Multi-family residential
in
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
a
b
o
v
e
r
e
t
a
i
l Bike paths and intersection
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s Parking
Ta
b
l
e
7
I
d
e
a
s
(C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
)
57
Ta
b
l
e
8
I
d
e
a
s
(C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
La
r
g
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
s
o
f
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
•
Us
e
r
f
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
•
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
p
a
c
e
a
n
d
m
i
d
-
r
i
s
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
t
a
i
l
•
Mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
v
i
b
r
a
n
c
y
•
Mo
r
e
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
58
La
r
g
e
s
c
a
l
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
e
r
s
Mu
l
t
i
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
in
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
a
b
o
v
e
re
t
a
i
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
d
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
Bi
k
e
p
a
t
h
s
Mu
l
t
i
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
sp
a
c
e
a
b
o
v
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
Gr
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
High-rise office
Of
f
i
c
e
s
Ho
t
e
l
High-rise office Retail Multi-family residential incorporated above retail Greenways Parking
Ta
b
l
e
8
I
d
e
a
s
(C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
W
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
#
2
)
59
Ta
b
l
e
A
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
Mi
n
i
m
a
l
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
•
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
•
Im
p
r
o
v
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
•
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
•
Ke
e
p
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
h
e
i
g
h
t
s
•
En
s
u
r
e
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
60Hotel
Ta
b
l
e
A
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Of
f
i
c
e
s
w
i
t
h
R
e
t
a
i
l
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
No
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
Sm
a
l
l
c
o
r
n
e
r
r
e
t
a
i
l
Mi
n
i
m
a
l
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
No changes
61
Ta
b
l
e
B
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
“A
n
y
t
h
i
n
g
t
h
e
r
e
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
b
e
t
t
e
r
”
•
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
l
a
r
g
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
f
o
c
u
s
•
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
h
e
i
g
h
t
l
i
m
i
t
s
a
n
d
l
o
w
de
n
s
i
t
y
•
Im
p
r
o
v
e
w
a
l
k
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
•
Mo
r
e
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
62Hotel
Ta
b
l
e
B
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Gr
e
e
n
f
r
e
e
w
a
y
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
Ne
w
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Ne
w
r
e
t
a
i
l
Se
n
i
o
r
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
Im
p
r
o
v
e
d
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
Re
t
a
i
l
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Consider tearing down mall More Santana Row-like Improved pedestrian experience
63
Ta
b
l
e
C
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
r
e
t
a
i
l
f
o
c
u
s
–
no
ho
u
s
i
n
g
o
r
o
f
f
i
c
e
u
s
e
s
•
Co
m
b
o
i
n
d
o
o
r
/
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
m
a
l
l
f
o
r
mo
r
e
w
a
l
k
a
b
l
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
•
Un
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
64
Ta
b
l
e
C
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Hotel
Co
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
e
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
Re
t
a
i
l
a
t
a
r
a
n
g
e
o
f
s
c
a
l
e
s
AM
C
T
h
e
a
t
r
e
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Re
t
a
i
l
Op
e
n
-
a
i
r
w
a
l
k
w
a
y
Keep parking and ice rink Retail Restaurant
65
Ta
b
l
e
D
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
Re
t
a
i
l
f
o
c
u
s
w
i
t
h
s
o
m
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
•
Op
e
n
t
o
n
e
w
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
i
f
n
o
s
c
h
o
o
l
im
p
a
c
t
s
•
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
“
l
o
o
k
s
g
o
o
d
”
•
Hi
g
h
-
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
n
e
w
r
e
t
a
i
l
•
Mo
r
e
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
a
n
d
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
66
Ta
b
l
e
D
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Hotel Trees to buffer freeway
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
p
a
r
k
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
l
a
r
g
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
an
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
Gr
e
e
n
w
a
y
b
u
f
f
e
r
s
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
f
o
r
n
e
w
ho
u
s
i
n
g
La
r
g
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
w
i
t
h
se
t
b
a
c
k
s
Ce
n
t
r
a
l
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
Medium and small retail New offices Parking
67
Ta
b
l
e
A
I
d
e
a
s
(C
h
a
m
b
e
r
o
f
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
e
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
Re
t
a
i
l
f
o
c
u
s
w
i
t
h
s
o
m
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
•
Re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
V
a
l
l
c
o
M
a
l
l
a
s
a
n
ex
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
M
a
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
•
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
o
n
t
h
e
p
e
r
i
m
e
t
e
r
•
Re
t
a
i
n
i
c
e
r
i
n
k
a
n
d
B
o
w
l
m
o
r
•
Ne
w
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
a
n
d
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
68
Ta
b
l
e
A
I
d
e
a
s
(C
h
a
m
b
e
r
o
f
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
e
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Perimeter Parking
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Ou
t
d
o
o
r
r
e
t
a
i
l
w
i
t
h
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
to
w
n
h
o
u
s
e
s
a
b
o
v
e
Ne
w
p
a
r
k
a
n
d
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
Im
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
i
k
e
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
g
r
o
u
n
d
-
f
l
o
o
r
re
t
a
i
l
t
o
e
x
t
e
n
d
M
a
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
Ce
n
t
r
a
l
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
Retain ice rink and Bowlmor New offices Central greenway
69
Ta
b
l
e
B
I
d
e
a
s
(C
h
a
m
b
e
r
o
f
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
e
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
Fl
e
x
i
b
l
e
,
u
n
i
q
u
e
s
p
a
c
e
s
•
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
u
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
•
Li
n
e
a
r
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
p
a
r
k
s
•
Mo
r
e
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
a
n
d
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
70
Ta
b
l
e
B
I
d
e
a
s
(C
h
a
m
b
e
r
o
f
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
e
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Hotel
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
p
a
r
k
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
r
e
t
a
i
l
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
o
v
e
r
r
e
t
a
i
l
Ne
w
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
Mi
x
e
d
/
f
l
e
x
i
b
l
e
u
s
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
Ne
w
c
e
n
t
r
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
Un
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
Gr
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
t
o
en
h
a
n
c
e
d
p
e
r
i
m
e
t
e
r
t
r
a
i
l
Retain Bowlmor and ice rink New offices New residential Pedestrian bridge to connect to Rose Bowl
71
Ta
b
l
e
1
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
•
Hi
g
h
-
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
o
f
f
i
c
e
t
o
w
e
r
s
•
Ne
w
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
b
a
r
s
•
Fa
r
m
e
r
’
s
m
a
r
k
e
t
a
n
d
f
o
o
d
t
r
u
c
k
s
•
Ap
p
l
e
m
u
s
e
u
m
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
72
Of
f
i
c
e
t
o
w
e
r
s
o
v
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
-
fl
o
o
r
r
e
t
a
i
l
Un
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
No
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ne
w
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
b
a
r
s
Fo
o
d
t
r
u
c
k
s
Ar
t
g
a
l
l
e
r
y
High density residential Neighborhood retail New neighborhood park and farmer’s marketNew Apple museum
Ta
b
l
e
1
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
73
Ta
b
l
e
2
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
s
t
r
o
n
g
r
e
t
a
i
l
f
o
c
u
s
•
At
t
r
a
c
t
h
i
g
h
-
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
f
l
a
g
s
h
i
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
•
Co
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
74
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
l
a
r
g
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
f
o
c
u
s
Ne
w
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
Ap
p
l
e
m
u
s
e
u
m
“F
l
a
g
s
h
i
p
”
st
o
r
e
t
o
a
c
t
i
v
a
t
e
co
r
n
e
r
Fa
r
m
e
r
’
s
m
a
r
k
e
t
“U
p
s
c
a
l
e
”
gr
o
c
e
r
y
s
t
o
r
e
New offices Concentrated retail and restaurants Rooftop park on Vallco mall
Co
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
e
d
pa
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
Ta
b
l
e
2
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
75
Ta
b
l
e
3
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
Ou
t
d
o
o
r
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
f
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
r
e
t
a
i
l
•
Gr
e
e
n
w
a
y
a
l
o
n
g
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
•
Re
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
c
o
f
f
e
e
s
h
o
p
s
•
Ne
w
p
a
r
k
s
76
An
c
h
o
r
e
d
b
y
l
a
r
g
e
,
m
e
d
i
u
m
an
d
s
m
a
l
l
r
e
t
a
i
l
Ne
w
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
en
t
e
r
t
a
i
n
m
e
n
t
-
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
u
s
e
s
Ce
n
t
r
a
l
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
p
a
r
k
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
f
o
r
l
a
r
g
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
Ne
w
c
e
l
l
t
o
w
e
r
s
Gr
e
e
n
w
a
y
a
l
o
n
g
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
r
e
t
a
i
l
Of
f
i
c
e
s
Parking Outdoor, pedestrian-oriented retail in a “park-like” setting Large retail anchor Central neighborhood park Coffee shops and restaurants
Ta
b
l
e
3
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
77
Ta
b
l
e
4
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
Ne
w
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
s
m
a
l
l
s
t
o
r
e
s
wi
t
h
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
s
e
a
t
i
n
g
•
Ce
n
t
r
a
l
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
•
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
•
Bi
k
e
s
h
a
r
e
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
•
Pe
r
i
m
e
t
e
r
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
78
Th
e
a
t
e
r
Mu
l
t
i
-
s
t
o
r
y
m
i
x
-
u
s
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
t
a
i
l
s
p
a
c
e
Ce
n
t
r
a
l
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
w
i
t
h
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
En
h
a
n
c
e
d
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
s
t
o
p
s
Co
f
f
e
e
s
h
o
p
s
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
se
a
t
i
n
g
l
i
k
e
S
t
a
n
f
o
r
d
La
r
g
e
a
n
d
s
m
a
l
l
s
t
o
r
e
s
w
i
t
h
ou
t
d
o
o
r
s
e
a
t
i
n
g
l
i
k
e
Va
l
l
e
y
F
a
i
r
Bi
k
e
s
h
a
r
e
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
Ne
w
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
Retain ice rink and Bowlmor New offices, with services
(e
.
g
.
,
d
a
y
c
a
r
e
)Urgent Care Center Central greenwayHotelParking
Ta
b
l
e
4
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
79
Ta
b
l
e
5
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
b
o
v
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
•
Un
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
•
Ne
w
c
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
u
s
e
s
:
m
u
s
e
u
m
,
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
an
d
e
x
p
l
o
r
a
t
o
r
i
u
m
f
o
r
k
i
d
s
•
Ro
o
f
t
o
p
p
a
r
k
•
Pe
r
i
m
e
t
e
r
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
80
La
r
g
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
a
n
c
h
o
r
Ex
p
l
o
r
a
t
o
r
i
u
m
f
o
r
k
i
d
s
Fa
r
m
e
r
’
s
M
a
r
k
e
t
Un
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
Ca
f
é
wi
t
h
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
s
e
a
t
i
n
g
Pe
r
i
m
e
t
e
r
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
Li
v
e
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
Mu
s
e
u
m
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
t
o
w
e
r
o
v
e
r
r
e
t
a
i
l
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Bi
g
-
b
o
x
r
e
t
a
i
l
w
i
t
h
r
o
o
f
t
o
p
pa
r
k
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
t
o
w
e
r
s
w
i
t
h
gr
o
u
n
d
-
f
l
o
o
r
r
e
t
a
i
l
Si
d
e
w
a
l
k
c
a
f
e
s
Un
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
Su
p
e
r
m
a
r
k
e
t
Ta
b
l
e
5
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
81
Ta
b
l
e
6
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
r
e
t
a
i
l
f
o
c
u
s
•
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
•
Pe
r
i
m
e
t
e
r
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
•
Ou
t
d
o
o
r
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
s
c
a
l
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
82
La
r
g
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
a
n
c
h
o
r
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Un
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Pe
r
i
m
e
t
e
r
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
r
e
t
a
i
l
f
o
c
u
s
,
a
t
a
mi
x
o
f
s
c
a
l
e
s
Pe
r
i
m
e
t
e
r
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
Ne
w
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
p
a
r
k
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Ap
p
l
e
m
u
s
e
u
m
Outdoor pedestrian-scale retail Central greenway Transit improvementsParkingHotel
Ta
b
l
e
6
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
83
Ta
b
l
e
7
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
b
i
g
-
b
o
x
r
e
t
a
i
l
f
o
c
u
s
o
n
no
r
t
h
e
r
n
h
a
l
f
o
f
s
i
t
e
•
Pa
r
k
s
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
o
n
so
u
t
h
e
r
n
h
a
l
f
o
f
s
i
t
e
•
In
t
e
r
n
a
l
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
a
n
d
p
a
r
k
s
•
Ne
w
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
84
Ne
w
p
a
t
h
w
a
y
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
st
o
r
e
s
f
o
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
Ce
n
t
r
a
l
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
gr
e
e
n
w
a
y
Of
f
i
c
e
s
Un
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
La
r
g
e
s
c
a
l
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
o
n
i
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
o
n
e
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
o
f
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
In
t
e
r
n
a
l
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
Cupertino gateway signage Anchor retail Dog park
Bi
g
-
b
o
x
r
e
t
a
i
l
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Retain ice rink Big-box retail
In
t
e
r
n
a
l
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
a
n
d
neighborhood park Grocery store Amphitheater
Ta
b
l
e
7
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
85
Ta
b
l
e
8
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
Mo
r
e
g
r
e
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
s
•
De
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
p
a
r
k
•
Be
t
t
e
r
-
d
e
f
i
n
e
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
p
a
c
e
s
•
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
c
e
n
t
e
r
•
Af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
d
i
n
i
n
g
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
•
Op
e
n
-
a
i
r
m
a
l
l
86
La
r
g
e
s
c
a
l
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
e
r
,
su
c
h
a
s
C
o
s
t
c
o
?
Pe
r
i
m
e
t
e
r
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Un
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
El
e
v
a
t
e
d
p
a
r
k
o
n
t
o
p
o
f
pa
r
k
i
n
g
g
a
r
a
g
e
s
Tw
o
t
o
t
h
r
e
e
s
t
o
r
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
p
a
r
k
Re
t
a
i
n
m
o
v
i
e
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
No changes
No
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
Retain Bowlmor and ice rink Neighborhood retail Central greenway Neighborhood parks New office building Underground parking
Ta
b
l
e
8
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
87
Ta
b
l
e
9
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
“S
c
r
a
p
a
n
d
r
e
d
o
”
mall
•
Im
p
r
o
v
e
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
•
Hi
g
h
-
and mid-rise residential and
of
f
i
c
e
s
o
v
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
f
l
o
o
r
r
e
t
a
i
l
•
Ou
t
d
o
o
r
r
e
t
a
i
l
e
x
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
•
Un
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
88
Ch
a
n
g
e
t
h
e
f
o
r
m
a
t
:
“
S
t
a
r
t
ov
e
r
”
wi
t
h
a
n
e
w
w
a
l
k
a
b
l
e
pl
a
c
e
w
i
t
h
r
e
a
l
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Ou
t
d
o
o
r
r
e
t
a
i
l
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
t
o
Sa
n
t
a
n
a
R
o
w
Pa
r
k
s
a
n
d
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
Mu
l
t
i
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
b
o
v
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
Ce
n
t
r
a
l
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
Un
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
a
n
d
p
e
r
i
m
e
t
e
r
pa
r
k
i
n
g
Re
t
a
i
n
m
o
v
i
e
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
Hotel Farmer’s market a “plus”
Hi
g
h
-
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
an
d
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
Offices with ground-floor retail Grocery store Restaurant on existing skyway over Wolfe Rd Potential farmer’s market on closed/shared Vallco Parkway
Ta
b
l
e
9
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
89
Ta
b
l
e
1
0
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
Ma
j
o
r
T
h
e
m
e
s
•
Ou
t
d
o
o
r
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
f
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
re
t
a
i
l
m
a
l
l
e
x
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
•
Ou
t
d
o
o
r
s
e
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
•
Ne
w
p
a
r
k
s
a
n
d
g
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
•
Pe
r
i
m
e
t
e
r
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
90
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
r
e
t
a
i
l
e
r
s
Ou
t
d
o
o
r
s
e
a
t
i
n
g
o
u
t
s
i
d
e
Ba
y
C
l
u
b
,
l
i
k
e
D
a
v
i
s
Fa
r
m
e
r
’
s
M
a
r
k
e
t
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Ou
t
d
o
o
r
m
a
l
l
,
l
i
k
e
“T
h
e
H
u
b
”
in
F
r
e
m
o
n
t
Gr
e
e
n
w
a
y
s
Pe
r
i
m
e
t
e
r
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
Li
b
r
a
r
y
K
i
o
s
k
Open space Bicycle enhancements
Ne
w
“
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
”
wi
t
h
d
i
v
e
r
s
e
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
Large and medium-scale retail Outdoor seating Central corridor greenway Perimeter Parking
Ta
b
l
e
1
0
I
d
e
a
s
(N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
B
l
o
c
k
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
)
91V. Next Steps
92
Ne
x
t
S
t
e
p
s
|
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
R
e
p
o
r
t
Th
e
C
i
t
y
r
e
c
e
n
t
l
y
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
a
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
Re
p
o
r
t
t
h
a
t
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s
t
h
r
e
e
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
f
o
r
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
Th
e
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
w
e
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
n
p
u
t
.
T
h
e
f
u
l
l
r
e
p
o
r
t
i
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
f
o
r
do
w
n
l
o
a
d
a
t
:
ww
w
.
c
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
g
p
a
.
o
r
g
93
Ne
x
t
S
t
e
p
s
|
Wo
r
k
s
h
o
p
s
a
n
d
S
t
u
d
y
S
e
s
s
i
o
n
s
Th
e
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
R
e
p
o
r
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
a
n
d
di
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
a
s
e
r
i
e
s
o
f
n
e
a
r
-
t
e
r
m
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
s
an
d
s
t
u
d
y
s
e
s
s
i
o
n
s
t
o
b
e
h
e
l
d
a
t
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
.
Pl
e
a
s
e
n
o
t
e
t
h
a
t
d
a
t
e
s
,
t
i
m
e
s
a
n
d
l
o
c
a
ti
o
n
s
a
r
e
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
c
h
a
n
g
e
,
s
o
p
l
e
a
s
e
ch
e
c
k
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
e
b
s
i
t
e
o
f
t
e
n
f
o
r
u
p
d
a
t
e
s
.
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
O
p
e
n
Ho
u
s
e
a
n
d
S
t
u
d
y
S
e
s
s
i
o
n
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
1
9
,
2
0
1
4
,
f
r
o
m
6
:
3
0
–
9:
0
0
p
.
m
.
Ci
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
S
t
u
d
y
S
e
s
s
i
o
n
Ma
r
c
h
4
,
2
0
1
4
,
f
r
o
m
3
:
0
0
–
6:
0
0
p
.
m
.
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
S
c
o
p
i
n
g
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
Ma
r
c
h
1
1
,
2
0
1
4
,
f
r
o
m
5
:
0
0
–
6:
0
0
p
.
m
.
Jo
i
n
t
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
a
n
d
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
S
t
u
d
y
S
e
s
s
i
o
n
Ap
r
i
l
1
,
2
0
1
4
,
f
r
o
m
3
:
0
0
–
6:
0
0
p
.
m
.
94
Ne
x
t
S
t
e
p
s
|
Vi
s
i
t
t
h
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
W
e
b
s
i
t
e
St
a
y
i
n
f
o
r
m
e
d
!
Th
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
e
b
s
i
t
e
i
s
t
h
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
’
s
p
o
r
t
a
l
f
o
r
a
l
l
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
re
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
Am
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
El
e
m
e
n
t
U
p
d
a
t
e
.
Pl
e
a
s
e
v
i
s
i
t
t
h
e
w
e
b
s
i
t
e
a
t
:
ww
w
.
c
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
g
p
a
.
o
r
g
........................................................................................................................
APPENDIX C:
AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS DATA AND
CALCULATION SHEET
........................................................................................................................
Criteria Air Pollutant and GHG Emissions
Worksheets
CUPERTINO - GHG EMISSIONS INVENTORY
Forecasting BAAQMD's GHG Target
Year 2020 2050 2040
MTCO2e/SP:6.6 1.3 3.1
Target Based on:BAAQMD AB 32 S-03-05 Interpolated*
% Reduction for Year:0%80%53%
Target:1990 Levels
80% Below 1990
Levels
53% Below 1990
Levels
SECTORS Existing 2013
Percent of
Total 2020
Percent of
Total Project 2040
Percent of
Total Alt A
Percent of
Total Alt B
Percent of
Total Current GP
Percent of
Total
Transportation 123,518 40%137,284 40%177,375 41%149,165 41%153,991 39%139,369 41%
Residential (Natural Gas and Electricity)74,579 24%78,574 23%89,987 21%81,183 23%86,136 22%81,183 24%
Nonresidential* (Natural Gas and Electricity)85,416 28%99,045 29%137,984 32%101,653 28%121,922 31%96,210 28%
City (Natural Gas and Electricity)1,081 0.3%1,178 0.3%1,178 0.3%1,216 0.3%1,351 0.3%1,194 0.3%
Waste 7,095 2%7,736 2%9,567 2%7,987 2%8,871 2%7,843 2%
Water/Wastewater 3,712 1%3,941 1%3,996 1%3,949 1%3,975 1%3,944 1%
Other - Offroad Equipment 14,006 5%14,331 4%15,259 4%14,422 4%14,890 4%14,318 4%
Total Community Emissions 309,406 100%342,089 100%435,345 100%359,576 100%391,136 100%344,062 100%
Service Population 85,689 93,429 115,542 96,466 107,143 94,721
MTCO2e/SP 3.6 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.6
BAAQMD GHG GP Threshold (PLAN LEVEL)NA 6.6 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1
Industrial - Permitted 3,355
Total Community Emissions w/Permitted 312,761
MTCO2e Adjusted BAU
SECTORS 2020
Percent of
Total Project 2040
Percent of
Total Alt A
Percent of
Total Alt B
Percent of
Total Current GP
Percent of
Total
Transportation 104,699 37%123,266 36%103,661 37%107,015 35%97,221 36%
Residential (Natural Gas and Electricity)70,324 25%80,539 23%72,660 26%77,092 25%72,660 27%
Nonresidential* (Natural Gas and Electricity)80,499 29%112,147 33%82,618 29%99,092 32%78,195 29%
City (Natural Gas and Electricity)891 0.3%1,102 0.3%920 0.3%1,022 0.3%903 0.3%
Waste 7,736 3%9,567 3%7,987 3%8,871 3%7,843 3%
Water/Wastewater 2,838 1%2,877 1%2,843 1%2,862 1%2,840 1%
Other - Offroad Equipment 12,898 5%13,733 4%12,980 5%13,401 4%12,886 5%
Total Community Emissions 279,884 100%343,229 100%283,670 100%309,355 100%272,549 100%
Service Population 93,429 115,542 96,466 107,143 94,721
MTCO2e/SP 3.0 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9
BAAQMD GHG GP Threshold (PLAN LEVEL)6.6 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1
MTCO2e/Year MTCO2e/Year
MTCO2e/Year MTCO2e/Year
CUPERTINO - GHG EMISSIONS INVENTORY
Forecasting BAAQMD's GHG Target
Year 2020 2050 2040
MTCO2e/SP:6.6 1.3 3.1
Target Based on:BAAQMD AB 32 S-03-05 Interpolated*
% Reduction for Year:0%80%53%
Target:1990 Levels
80% Below 1990
Levels
53% Below 1990
Levels
Change from 2013 MTCO2e compared to the Adjusted BAU
SECTORS Delta 2020
Percent
Change Delta 2040
Percent
Change Delta Alt A
Percent
Change Delta Alt B
Percent
Change
Delta Current
GP
Percent
Change
Transportation -18,819 -15%-252 0%-19,857 -16%-16,503 -13%-26,296 -21%
Residential (Natural Gas and Electricity)-4,255 -6%5,960 8%-1,919 -3%2,513 3%-1,919 -3%
Nonresidential* (Natural Gas and Electricity)-4,917 -6%26,731 31%-2,798 -3%13,676 16%-7,221 -8%
City (Natural Gas and Electricity)-189 -18%21 2%-161 -15%-59 -5%-177 -16%
Waste 641 9%2,472 35%892 13%1,776 25%748 11%
Water/Wastewater -874 -24%-835 -23%-869 -23%-850 -23%-872 -23%
Other - Offroad Equipment -1,108 -8%-273 -2%-1,026 -7%-605 -4%-1,119 -8%
Total Community Emissions -29,522 -10%33,823 11%-25,736 -8%-51 0%-36,857 -12%
Change from BAU MTCO2e
SECTORS Delta 2020
Percent
Change Delta 2040
Percent
Change Delta Alt A
Percent
Change Delta Alt B
Percent
Change
Delta Current
GP
Percent
Change
Transportation -32,585 -24%-54,109 -31%-45,504 -31%-46,976 -31%-42,147 -30%
Residential (Natural Gas and Electricity)-8,250 -10%-9,448 -10%-8,524 -10%-9,044 -10%-8,524 -10%
Nonresidential* (Natural Gas and Electricity)-18,546 -19%-25,837 -19%-19,034 -19%-22,830 -19%-18,015 -19%
City (Natural Gas and Electricity)-287 -24%-76 -6%-296 -24%-329 -24%-291 -24%
Waste 0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%0 0%
Water/Wastewater -1,104 -28%-1,119 -28%-1,106 -28%-1,113 -28%-1,105 -28%
Other - Offroad Equipment -1,433 -10%-1,526 -10%-1,442 -10%-1,489 -10%-1,432 -10%
Total Community Emissions -62,205 -18%-92,116 -21%-75,906 -21%-81,781 -21%-71,513 -21%
Notes:
Lifecycle: Life cycle emissions are not included in this analysis because not enough information is available for the proposed Project, and therefore life cycle GHG emissions would be speculative.
Agricultural: Agricultural emissions are not included in the analysis because not enough information is available regarding agricultural use in the City and remaining agricultural lands comprise a very small portion of the City’s land use. Therefore agricultural GHG emissions would represent a nominal portion of
the City’s GHG emissions inventory (less than 1 percent) and quantifying emissions from this sector would be speculative.
Other Sources. OFFROAD2007. Estimated based on population (Landscaping), employment (Light Commercial Equipment), and construction building permits (Construction) for Cupertino as a percentage of Santa Clara County. Excludes BAAQMD permitted sources (see note below). Daily construction emissions
multiplied by 347 days/year to account for reduced/limited construction activity on weekends and holidays.
Industrial Sector are "point" sources that are permitted by BAAQMD. Because the reductions associated with the Industrial sector are regulated separately by BAAQMD and CARB (e.g., through the CAP and trade program and industry-specific sector reductions) and are not under the jurisdiction of the City of
Cupertino, these emissions are shown for informational purposes only.
Adjusted BAU includes reductions identified in the Scoping Plan associated with Transportation (Pavely+LCFS), Energy & Water/Wastewater (improvements in the carbon intensity of electricity identified by PG&E), and Other (LCFS). The current inventory does not account for reductions in building energy use
from Title 24 cycle updates.
Emissions forecasts for the non-transportation sectors are based on changes in housing units (residential energy), population (area sources,) employment (nonresidential energy, area sources), or service population (city energy, waste, water/wastewater).
Transportation. EMFAC2011 and Hexagon using the VTA model.
Energy. Energy use based on a three year (2010-2012) average provided by PG&E. Nonresidential* includes direct access customers, county facilities, and other district facilities within the City boundaries. PG&E energy based on PG&E’s carbon intensity. Direct access energy based on the WCI carbon intensity for
the WECC Region.
Water/Wastewater. Includes fugitive emissions from wastewater processing and energy associated with water/wastewater treatment and conveyance. Water use is estimated based on generation rates identified in the California Water Company Los Altos District and the San Jose Water Company's 2010 Urban
Water Management Plan.
Waste. CARB Landfill Emissions Tool Version 1_2013 and CalRecycle. Waste generation based on three year average (2010-2012) waste commitment for the City of Cupertino obtained from CalRecycle. Assumes 75 percent of fugitive GHG emissions are captured within the landfill's Landfill Gas Capture System
with a landfill gas capture efficiency of 75%. The Landfill gas capture efficiency is based on the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) Local Government Operations Protocol (LGOP), Version 1.1.
CUPERTINO - CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANT INVENTORY
SECTORS ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5
Transportation 148 1,113 115 55
Energy - Residential (Natural Gas)28 239 19 19
Energy - Nonresidential* (Natural Gas)19 174 13 13
Energy - City (Natural Gas)0 1 0 0
Area Sources (Consumer Products)1,051 ---
Area Sources (Landscaping, Light Commercial Equipment)178 115 13 13
Other (Construction Equipment)93 619 39 38
Total 1,516 2,260 200 140
SECTORS ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5
Transportation 26 193 20 10
Energy - Residential (Natural Gas)5 44 4 4
Energy - Nonresidential* (Natural Gas)3 32 2 2
Energy - City (Natural Gas)0 0 0 0
Area Sources (Consumer Products)192 ---
Area Sources (Landscaping, Light Commercial Equipment)32 21 2 2
Other (Construction Equipment)**16 107 7 7
Total 275 397 35 25
2013 - lbs/day
2013 - tons/year
CUPERTINO - CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANT INVENTORY
SECTORS ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5
Transportation 54 307 105 46
Energy - Residential (Natural Gas)28 239 19 19
Energy - Nonresidential* (Natural Gas)19 174 13 13
Energy - City (Natural Gas)0 1 0 0
Area Sources (Consumer Products)1,051 ---
Area Sources (Landscaping, Light Commercial Equipment)178 115 13 13
Other (Construction Equipment)93 619 39 38
Total 1,422 1,455 190 130
SECTORS ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5
Transportation 9 53 18 8
Energy - Residential (Natural Gas)5 44 4 4
Energy - Nonresidential* (Natural Gas)3 32 2 2
Energy - City (Natural Gas)0 0 0 0
Area Sources (Consumer Products)192 ---
Area Sources (Landscaping, Light Commercial Equipment)32 21 2 2
Other (Construction Equipment)**16 107 7 7
Total 258 257 33 23
SECTORS ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5
Transportation 76 433 148 65
Energy - Residential (Natural Gas)34 289 23 23
Energy - Nonresidential* (Natural Gas)31 280 21 21
Energy - City (Natural Gas)0 2 0 0
Area Sources (Consumer Products)1,381 ---
Area Sources (Landscaping, Light Commercial Equipment)233 171 20 19
Other (Construction Equipment)93 619 39 38
Total 1,848 1,793 251 167
Change from 2013 Land Uses 426 1,536 218 144
SECTORS ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5
Transportation 13 75 26 11
Energy - Residential (Natural Gas)6 53 4 4
Energy - Nonresidential* (Natural Gas)6 51 4 4
Energy - City (Natural Gas)0 0 0 0
Area Sources (Consumer Products)252 ---
Area Sources (Landscaping, Light Commercial Equipment)43 31 4 4
Other (Construction Equipment)**16 107 7 7
Total 336 318 44 30
Change from 2013 Land Uses 77 61 11 7
2040 Existing Land Uses - lbs/day
2040 - tons/year
2040 Project Land Uses - lbs/day
2040 - tons/year
CUPERTINO - CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANT INVENTORY
SECTORS ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5
Transportation 64 364 124 54
Energy - Residential (Natural Gas)30 260 21 21
Energy - Nonresidential* (Natural Gas)23 207 16 16
Energy - City (Natural Gas)0 2 0 0
Area Sources (Consumer Products)1,181 ---
Area Sources (Landscaping, Light Commercial Equipment)199 133 15 15
Other (Construction Equipment)93 619 39 38
Total 1,589 1,584 215 145
Change from 2013 Land Uses 167 1,327 182 122
SECTORS ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5
Transportation 11 63 22 9
Energy - Residential (Natural Gas)6 48 4 4
Energy - Nonresidential* (Natural Gas)4 38 3 3
Energy - City (Natural Gas)0 0 0 0
Area Sources (Consumer Products)215 ---
Area Sources (Landscaping, Light Commercial Equipment)36 24 3 3
Other (Construction Equipment)**16 107 7 7
Total 289 280 38 26
Change from 2013 Land Uses 30 23 5 3
SECTORS ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5
Transportation 66 376 128 56
Energy - Residential (Natural Gas)32 276 22 22
Energy - Nonresidential* (Natural Gas)27 248 19 19
Energy - City (Natural Gas)0 2 0 0
Area Sources (Consumer Products)1,295 ---
Area Sources (Landscaping, Light Commercial Equipment)218 154 18 18
Other (Construction Equipment)93 619 39 38
Total 1,732 1,674 226 153
Change from 2013 Land Uses 309 1,417 193 130
SECTORS ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5
Transportation 11 65 22 10
Energy - Residential (Natural Gas)6 50 4 4
Energy - Nonresidential* (Natural Gas)5 45 3 3
Energy - City (Natural Gas)0 0 0 0
Area Sources (Consumer Products)236 ---
Area Sources (Landscaping, Light Commercial Equipment)40 28 3 3
Other (Construction Equipment)**16 107 7 7
Total 315 297 40 27
Change from 2013 Land Uses 56 39 6 4
2040 Alt A Land Uses - lbs/day
2040 - tons/year
2040 Alt B Land Uses - lbs/day
2040 - tons/year
CUPERTINO - CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANT INVENTORY
SECTORS ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5
Transportation 60 341 117 51
Energy - Residential (Natural Gas)30 260 21 21
Energy - Nonresidential* (Natural Gas)21 195 15 15
Energy - City (Natural Gas)0 1 0 0
Area Sources (Consumer Products)1,171 ---
Area Sources (Landscaping, Light Commercial Equipment)196 128 15 15
Other (Construction Equipment)93 619 39 38
Total 1,571 1,545 206 140
Change from 2013 Land Uses 149 1,288 173 117
SECTORS ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5
Transportation 10 59 20 9
Energy - Residential (Natural Gas)6 48 4 4
Energy - Nonresidential* (Natural Gas)4 36 3 3
Energy - City (Natural Gas)0 0 0 0
Area Sources (Consumer Products)214 ---
Area Sources (Landscaping, Light Commercial Equipment)36 23 3 3
Other (Construction Equipment)**16 107 7 7
Total 285 273 36 25
Change from 2013 Land Uses 27 16 3 2
Notes:
Emissions forecasts for the non-transportation sectors are based on changes in housing units (residential energy), population (area sources,)
employment (nonresidential energy, area sources), or service population (city energy).
Current General Plan Land Uses - lbs/day
2040 - tons/year
Transportation. EMFAC2011 (exhaust and evaporative only) and Hexagon 2014. Transportation sector includes the full trip length. Daily
emissions multiplied by 347 days/year to account for reduced traffic on weekends and holidays. This assumption is consistent with the
California Air Resources Board's (CARB) methodology within the Climate Change Scoping Plan Measure Documentation Supplement.
Energy. Based on three-year average (2010-2012) of energy use provided by PG&E . Nonresidential* includes direct county facilities, and other
district facilities within the City boundaries.
Other Sources. OFFROAD2007. Estimated based on population (Landscaping), employment (Light Commercial Equipment), and construction
building permits (Construction) for Cupertino as a percentage of Santa Clara County. Excludes BAAQMD permitted sources (see note below).
Daily construction emissions multiplied by 347 days/year to account for reduced/limited construction activity on weekends and holidays.
Area Sources. OFFROAD2007. Estimated based on population (Landscaping) and employment (Light Commercial Equipment) for Cupertino as a
percentage of Santa Clara County. Excludes BAAQMD permitted sources. Does not include emissions from wood-burning fireplaces.
Model Inputs for the Cupertino General Plan
forecast
CEQA Baseline
Proposed
Project (Alt C)
AB 32 Target
Year
Reduced
Intensity
Reduced
Intensity
No Project
Scenario
2013 2040 2020 2040 Alt A 2040 Alt B Current GP
Housing Units 21,399 25,820 22,545 23,294 24,715 23,294
Population 58,302 71,300 61,672 63,873 68,051 63,873
Employment 27,387 44,242 31,757 32,593 39,092 30,848
Service Population 85,689 115,542 93,429 96,466 107,143 94,721
Growth Rates from Baseline 2040 2020 2040 Alt A 2040 Alt B Current GP
Housing Growth Rate 1.21 1.05 1.09 1.15 1.09
Population Growth Rate 1.22 1.06 1.10 1.17 1.10
Employment Growth Rate 1.62 1.16 1.19 1.43 1.13
Service Population Growth Rate 1.35 1.09 1.13 1.25 1.11
Electricity Use 2013
Proposed
Project 2020 2040 Alt A 2040 Alt B Current GP
Residential Electricity (Kwh)1 123,012,782 148,427,030 129,601,661 133,906,245 142,074,905 133,906,245
Commercial + Industrial Electricity (Kwh)2 236,835,529 382,593,109 274,624,531 281,855,639 338,057,272 266,765,341
City (Kwh)3 4,136,516 5,577,628 4,510,138 4,656,761 5,172,178 4,572,523
Direct Access (Kwh)2 9,551,751 15,430,262 11,075,810 11,367,446 13,634,099 10,758,843
Total Electricity (Kwh)373,536,578 552,028,029 419,812,140 431,786,091 498,938,454 416,002,952
Source
1
2
3
Natural Gas Use 2013
Proposed
Project 2020 2040 Alt A 2040 Alt B Current GP
Residential Natural Gas (Therms)1 9,470,832 11,427,491 9,978,114 10,309,526 10,938,437 10,309,526
Commercial+Industrial Natural Gas (Therms)2 6,460,229 10,436,099 7,491,010 7,688,255 9,221,282 7,276,632
City (Therms)3 49,970 67,378 54,483 56,254 62,481 55,237
Total Natural Gas (Therms)15,981,030 21,930,968 17,523,607 18,054,035 20,222,200 17,641,395
Source
1
2
3
On-Road Transportation 2013
Proposed
Project 2020 2040 Alt A 2040 Alt B Current GP
VMT/day 897,419 1,264,271 992,529 1,063,199 1,097,596 997,145
Source
1 VMT provided by Hexagon based on the VTA model.
2 2020 Forecast based on the anticipated growth due to the Project and 2013 conditions
Provided by PG&E. Projected based on increase in employment. 2013 Based on a three-year average of 2010 to 2012 data.
Provided by PG&E. Projected based on increase in service population. 2013 Based on a three-year average of 2010 to 2012 data.
Provided by PG&E. Projected based on increase in housing units. 2013 Based on a three-year average of 2010 to 2012 data.
Provided by PG&E. Projected based on increase in employment. 2013 Based on a three-year average of 2010 to 2012 data.
Provided by PG&E. Projected based on increase in service population. 2013 Based on a three-year average of 2010 to 2012 data.
Provided by PG&E. Projected based on increase in housing units. 2013 Based on a three-year average of 2010 to 2012 data.
Model Inputs for the Cupertino General Plan
forecast
CEQA Baseline
Proposed
Project (Alt C)
AB 32 Target
Year
Reduced
Intensity
Reduced
Intensity
No Project
Scenario
2013 2040 2020 2040 Alt A 2040 Alt B Current GP
Housing Units 21,399 25,820 22,545 23,294 24,715 23,294
Population 58,302 71,300 61,672 63,873 68,051 63,873
Employment 27,387 44,242 31,757 32,593 39,092 30,848
Service Population 85,689 115,542 93,429 96,466 107,143 94,721
Growth Rates from Baseline 2040 2020 2040 Alt A 2040 Alt B Current GP
Housing Growth Rate 1.21 1.05 1.09 1.15 1.09
Population Growth Rate 1.22 1.06 1.10 1.17 1.10
Employment Growth Rate 1.62 1.16 1.19 1.43 1.13
Service Population Growth Rate 1.35 1.09 1.13 1.25 1.11
Water Conveyance 2013
Proposed
Project 2020 2040 Alt A 2040 Alt B Current GP
Water (AF/year)10,785 11,609 11,451 11,472 11,549 11,460
Water (gallons/year)3,514,157,220 3,782,658,797 3,731,270,862 3,738,329,150 3,763,140,832 3,734,274,043
Source
1
Wastewater Treatment 2013
Proposed
Project 2020 2040 Alt A 2040 Alt B Current GP
Wastewater (gallons/year)2,108,494,332 2,269,595,278 2,238,762,517 2,242,997,490 2,257,884,499 2,240,564,426
Source
1
Solid Waste Generation 2013
Proposed
Project 2020 2040 Alt A 2040 Alt B Current GP
Waste Generation (tons/year)28,994 39,095 31,613 32,641 36,253 32,050
Waste Generation ADC (tons/year)489 659 533 551 611 541
Total Waste Disposal (tons/year)29,483 39,755 32,146 33,191 36,865 32,591
Source
1
2
CalRecycle. Jurisdiction Diversion/Disposal Rate Summary (2007 - Current) . Accessed April 014.
http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/reports/diversionprogram/JurisdictionDiversionPost2006.aspx.
Total water generation for Cupertino is based on the California Water Company Los Altos District's and the San Jose Water
Company's 2010 Urban Water Management Plan SBX7-7. Forecasts are adjusted for increases in population and employment and
are based on the Target per capita SBx7-7 based on residential and non-residential growth.
Indoor water use is 100 percent wastewater. Based on the percentage of water gpcd demand and gpcd wastewater generation in
the San Jose Water Company's 2010 UWMP, indoor water use is approximately 60% of total demand. This is consistent with the
California Department of Water Resources' 20x2020 Water Conservation Plan. Figure 5 for indoor/outdoor water use for Hydrologic
Region 4.
CalRecycle. Disposal Reporting System (DRS) : Jurisdiction Disposal and Alternative Daily Cover (ADC) Tons by Facility. Accessed April
2014. http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/Reports/DRS/Destination/JurDspFa.aspx. 2013 is based on an average 2010-2012
disposal rates. Projected based on Service Population.
Criteria Air Pollutant and GHG Emissions
Water/Wastewater
Water and Wastewater
Water Demand Calculations Derived from the Urban Water Management Plans
California Water Company (Los Altos District) and the San José Water Company
California Water Company - Los Altos Water District
Cupertino represents about 20% of the service area of the Los Altos District.
Based on U.S. Census data, the LAS District population is estimated by Cal Water to be 65,550 in 2010
Percent of Total Population within the LAS1:22%
Cupertino Population within the LAS1:13,110
Estimate of employment within LAS:6,158
Service Population 19,268
Residential
Commercial,
Industrial,
Institutional &
Other Total
2010 Acre-Feet (AF) Per Year2 9,453 2,849 12,302 Whole District
Percent 77%23%
Gallons Per Capita Per Day (gpcd)2 238
adjusted for SP 162 service population used in UWMP based on population only.
Source:
1
2
San Jose Water Company
Cupertino remaining population is assumed to be within the San Jose Water Company Service Area.
The San Jose Water Company population is estimated at 946,494 in 2010
Cupertino Total Population within the SJWD1:78%
Cupertino Population within the SJWD1:45,192
Percent of employment:21,229
Service Population 66,421
Residential
Commercial,
Industrial,
Institutional &
Other Total
2010 Acre-Feet (AF) Per Year2 76,567 49,267 125,834 Whole District
Percent 61%39%
Gallons Per Capita Per Day (gpcd)2 144
adjusted for SP 98 service population used in UWMP based on population only.
indoor water use percentage2:60%Based on the wastewater gpcd in the UWMP
Source:
1
2
9627828
Cupertino
Residential
Commercial,
Industrial,
Institutional &
Other
Average residential v. Non-Residential 69%31%Growth Rates from the Proposed Project (Service Population)
AF GPD AB 32 Target Year Reduced Intensity Reduced Intensity
No Project
Scenario
Proposed Project (Alt C) Water Demand1 824 735,621 -0.19 -0.17 -0.07 -0.18
Gallons Per Day CEQA Baseline
Proposed Project
(Alt C)AB 32 Target Year Reduced Intensity Reduced Intensity
No Project
Scenario
Residential 6,357,332 6,863,766 6,766,840 6,780,153 6,826,952 6,772,505
Commercial, Industrial, Inst., and Other 3,270,496 3,499,683 3,455,820 3,461,844 3,483,023 3,458,383
Total 9,627,828 10,363,449 10,222,660 10,241,998 10,309,975 10,230,888
AFY 10,785 11,609 11,451 11,472 11,549 11,460
Increase from 2013 824 666 688 764 676
Source:
1
2
Yarne & Associates, Inc., 2014, April 24. City of Cupertino, California Proposed General Plan Amendment Water Supply
Evaluation
Water Demand of the alternatives adjusted for Service Population
Yarne & Associates, Inc., 2014, April 24. City of Cupertino, California Proposed General Plan Amendment Water Supply
Evaluation
California Water Service Company., 2011, June. 2010 Urban Water Management Plan, Los Altos Suburban District (LAS).
Yarne & Associates, Inc., 2014, April 24. City of Cupertino, California Proposed General Plan Amendment Water Supply
Evaluation
San Jose Water Company (SJWC), 2011, April. 2010 Urban Water Management Plan.
** Modeling assumes that 60 percent of water use is indoor water use (40% outdoor) and would require wastewater treatment.
Water and Wastewater
Fugitive Emissions - Process Emissions from WWTP with Nitrification/Denitrification
Fugitive Emissions - Process Emissions from WWTP with Nitrification/Denitrification
LGOP Version 1.1. Equation 10.9.
N2O =
CEQA Baseline
Proposed Project
(Alt C)AB 32 Target Year Reduced Intensity Reduced Intensity
No Project
Scenario
wastewater (Liters)=7,980,651,047 8,590,418,129 8,473,716,127 8,489,745,500 8,546,092,830 8,480,536,351
10^-6 =1.00E-06 conversion factor; kg/mg
N Load 40.00 mg/L of wastewater USEPA 2008
EF effluent 0.01 kg/N2O/kg N
10^-3 =1.00E-03 conversion factor: MTons/kg
CEQA Baseline
Proposed Project
(Alt C)AB 32 Target Year Reduced Intensity Reduced Intensity
No Project
Scenario
MTons
N2O 1.60 1.72 1.69 1.70 1.71 1.70
CO2e =495 533 525 526 530 526
Source: California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2010, May. Local Government Operations Protocol (LGOP), Version 1.1. The LGOP protocol provides default values for all the terms except the
Nitrogen Load, which is assumed to be 40 mg of N per Liter of wastewater effluent based on USEPA methodology outlined in the CalEEMod program manual. South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD). 2011. California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), Version 2011.1.1. User's Manual. USEPA. 2008. Page 8-12. USEPA cites Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 1991,
“Wastewater Engineering: Treatment Disposal, and Reuse,” 3rd Ed. McGraw Hill Publishing.
CH4 - Microorganisms can biodegrade soluble organic material in wastewater under aerobic (presence of oxygen) or anaerobic (absence of oxygen) conditions. Anaerobic conditions result in
the production of CH4.
N2O - Treatment of domestic wastewater during both nitrification and denitrification of the nitrogen present leads to the formation of N2O, usually in the form of urea, ammonia, and
proteins. These compounds are converted to nitrate through the aerobic process of nitrification. Denitrification occurs under anoxic conditions (without free oxygen), and involves the
biological conversion of nitrate into dinitrogen. N2O can be an intermediate product of both processes, but more often is associated with denitrification.
Notes: Waste discharge facilities in compliance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Water Standards do not typically result in CH4 emissions. However, poorly-
operated aerobic wastewater treatment systems can result in the generation of CH4. Because wastewater treatment systems are assumed to operate in compliance with state and federal laws
pertaining to water quality, CH4 emissions from centralized aerobic treatments are not included in the inventory.
Wastewater x 10^-6 x Nload x EF effluent x 10^3
Water and Wastewater
Energy for Water Conveyance, Treatment, Distribution, and Wastewater Treatment (Northern California)
Water Supply and Conveyance Water Treatment Water Distribution Total Water
Wastewater
Treatment
2,117 111 1,272 3,500 1,911
CO2e
lbs CO2/MWH MTons CO2/MWh CH4 MTons/MWH N2O MTons/MWH MTons/MWh
2005 489 0.222 0.000013 0.000005 0.224
2006 456 0.207 0.000013 0.000005 0.209
2007 636 0.288 0.000013 0.000005 0.290
2008 641 0.291 0.000013 0.000005 0.293
2009 575 0.261 0.000013 0.000005 0.263
2010 445 0.202 0.000013 0.000005 0.204
2011 393 0.178 0.000013 0.000005 0.180
2012 453 0.205 0.000013 0.000005 0.207
3-Year Average (2010-2012) based on PG&E 430 0.195 0.000013 0.000005 0.197
2020 (CO2)3 290 0.132 0.000013 0.000005 0.133
1
Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) 2014.
2 CH4 and N2O intensity based on California E-Grid data (CH4 = 0.029 lbs/MWH; N2O = 0.011 lbs/MWH)
3
GHG Emissions from Energy Associated with Water/Wastewater
CEQA Baseline
Proposed Project
(Alt C)AB 32 Target Year Reduced Intensity Reduced Intensity
No Project
Scenario
MwH/Year Alt A Alt B
Water 12,300 13,239 13,059 13,084 13,171 13,070
Wastewater 4,029 4,337 4,278 4,286 4,315 4,282
Total Water/Wastewater 16,329 17,577 17,338 17,371 17,486 17,352
CEQA Baseline
Proposed Project
(Alt C)AB 32 Target Year Reduced Intensity Reduced Intensity
No Project
Scenario
MTCO2e/Year Alt A Alt B
Water 2,423 2,608 2,573 2,578 2,595 2,575
Wastewater 794 855 843 844 850 844
Total Water/Wastewater 3,217 3,463 3,416 3,422 3,445 3,419
Total GHGs
CEQA Baseline
Proposed Project
(Alt C)AB 32 Target Year Reduced Intensity Reduced Intensity
No Project
Scenario
MTCO2e/Year Alt A Alt B
Water 2,423 2,608 2,573 2,578 2,595 2,575
Wastewater 1,289 1,387 1,368 1,371 1,380 1,369
Total Water/Wastewater 3,712 3,996 3,941 3,949 3,975 3,944
GHG Emissions from Energy Use - Adjusted for Lower Carbon Intensity in 2020
Proposed Project
(Alt C)AB 32 Target Year Reduced Intensity Reduced Intensity
No Project
Scenario
MTCO2e/Year Alt A Alt B
Water 1,766 1,742 1,745 1,757 1,743
Wastewater 1,111 1,096 1,098 1,105 1,097
Total Water/Wastewater 2,877 2,838 2,843 2,862 2,840
kWhr/million gallons
Source: California Energy Commission (CEC). 2006, December. Refining Estimates of Water-Related Energy Use in California. CEC-500-2006-118. Prepared by Navigant
Consulting, Inc. Based on the electricity use for Northern California.
Intensity factor
Source:
Energy Associated with Water Use
GHG Emissions from Energy Associated with
Water Use/Wastewater Generation
GHG Emissions from Water/Wastewater Use
The 2020 emissions rate is estimated by PG&E. It includes reductions from 33% Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), Cap-and-
Trade, and other regulatory reductions for High Global Warming Potential (HGWP) gases such as reductions of SF6. Pacific Gas &
Electric (PG&E). 2011, April. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Factors Info
Sheet.http://www.pge.com/includes/docs/pdfs/shared/environment/calculator/pge_ghg_emission_factor_info_sheet.pdf
GHG Emissions from Water/Wastewater Use
Water and Wastewater
General Conversion Factors
Global Warming
Potentials (GWP)
CO2 1
CH4 21
N2O 310
gallons to Liters 3.785
killowatt hrs to megawatt hrs 0.001
gallons to AF 325851.4290
Tons to MTon 0.9071847
Source: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2001. Third Assessment Report: Climate Change 2011.
Criteria Air Pollutant and GHG Emissions
Solid Waste
Solid Waste Disposal
Source: CalRecycle Disposal By Facility - City of Cupertino (Disposal Reporting System)
Waste Generated Within City Limits
Year
Interstate Tons +
Transform Tons ADC+AIC
2012 27,593 341
2011 28,704 196
2010 30,685 930
Average 2012-2010 28,994 489
Landfill Emission Tool (version 1.3) Model Results
CH4 Tons
MTCO2e w/LFG
Capture
MTCO2e w/LFG
Capture
MTCO2e w/LFG
Capture
MTCO2e w/LFG
Capture
MTCO2e w/LFG
Capture
MTCO2e w/LFG
Capture
2013 Disposal 2013 Disposal 2040 Disposal 2020 Disposal 2040 Alt A Disposal 2040 Alt B Disposal Current GP Disposal
2012 252 3,595 4,847 3,920 4,047 4,495 3,974
2013 497 7,095 9,567 7,736 7,987 8,871 7,843
2014 487 6,954 9,377 7,582 7,829 8,695 7,687
2015 477 6,817 9,191 7,432 7,674 8,523 7,535
2016 468 6,682 9,009 7,285 7,522 8,355 7,386
2017 458 6,549 8,831 7,141 7,373 8,189 7,240
2018 449 6,420 8,656 6,999 7,227 8,027 7,096
2019 440 6,293 8,485 6,861 7,084 7,868 6,956
2020 432 6,168 8,317 6,725 6,944 7,712 6,818
Notes
LFG capture
Efficiency 0.75 CH4 GWP 21 Tons to metric Tons 0.9071847
Biogenic CO2 emissions are not included.
The Landfill Gas Estimator only includes the landfill gas (LFG) capture in the landfill gas heat output and therefore the reduction and emissions from landfill gas capture are calculated
Average 3-year disposal used to forecast waste disposal in 2020, 2035, and Post-2035
Source: CalRecycle, 2014, Disposal Reporting System, Jurisdiction Reporting by Facility, http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/Reports/DRS/Destination/JurDspFa.aspx
Waste. Landfill Emissions Tool Version 1.3 and CalRecycle. Biogenic CO2 emissions are not included.
Waste generation based on three year average (2010-2012) waste commitment for the City of Cupertino obtained from CalRecycle.
Significant CH4 production typically begins one or two years after waste disposal in a landfill and continues for 10 to 60 years or longer. Consequently, the highest CH4 emissions from
Decomposition based on an average annual rainfall of 12.37 inches per year average (anaerobic decomposition factor (k) of 0.02) (WRCC 2014).
Notes:
1. Disposal tonnage is subject to change due to revisions. Report is based upon information provided by County disposal reports.
2. AIC information was not collected prior to 2006.
Print Date: 4/22/2014 10:18:59 AM
Destination Facility SWISNo Qtr
Transform
Ton Export Ton Total AIC
Altamont Landfill & Resource Recv`ry 01-AA-0009
Azusa Land Reclamation Co. Landfill 19-AA-0013
Bakersfield Metropolitan (Bena) SLF 15-AA-0273
Corinda Los Trancos Landfill ( Ox Mtn)41-AA-0002
Guadalupe Sanitary Landfill 43-AN-0015
Kettleman Hills - B18 Nonhaz Codisposal 16-AA-0023
Kirby Canyon Recycl.& Disp. Facility 43-AN-0008
Monterey Peninsula Landfill 27-AA-0010
Newby Island Sanitary Landfill 43-AN-0003
Potrero Hills Landfill 48-AA-0075
Recology Hay Road 48-AA-0002
Redwood Landfill 21-AA-0001
Tri Cities Recycling & Disposal Fac 01-AA-0008
Vasco Road Sanitary Landfill 01-AA-0010
Zanker Material Processing Facility 43-AN-0001
Zanker Road Class III Landfill 43-AN-0007
Yearly Totals:....30,684.96.930.43.
72 294
328 516
111
1
7
915
28,567
69
6 76
14
328 40
159 5
32
77
California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle)
Disposal Reporting System (DRS)
Jurisdiction Disposal By Facility
With Reported Alternative Daily Cover (ADC) and Alternative Intermediate Cover (AIC)
Disposal during 2010 for Cupertino
Instate
Ton Total ADC
Notes:
1. Disposal tonnage is subject to change due to revisions. Report is based upon information provided by County disposal reports.
2. AIC information was not collected prior to 2006.
Print Date: 4/22/2014 10:18:08 AM
Destination Facility SWISNo Qtr
Transform
Ton Export Ton Total AIC
Altamont Landfill & Resource Recv`ry 01-AA-0009
Azusa Land Reclamation Co. Landfill 19-AA-0013
Corinda Los Trancos Landfill ( Ox Mtn)41-AA-0002
Forward Landfill, Inc.39-AA-0015
Guadalupe Sanitary Landfill 43-AN-0015
Kirby Canyon Recycl.& Disp. Facility 43-AN-0008
Monterey Peninsula Landfill 27-AA-0010
Newby Island Sanitary Landfill 43-AN-0003
Potrero Hills Landfill 48-AA-0075
Recology Hay Road 48-AA-0002
Tri Cities Recycling & Disposal Fac 01-AA-0008
Vasco Road Sanitary Landfill 01-AA-0010
Zanker Material Processing Facility 43-AN-0001
Zanker Road Class III Landfill 43-AN-0007
Yearly Totals:....28,704.37.195.75.
5
112 102
5
97
138
27,004 7
906 34
9 15
314 16
88 21
6
21
California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle)
Disposal Reporting System (DRS)
Jurisdiction Disposal By Facility
With Reported Alternative Daily Cover (ADC) and Alternative Intermediate Cover (AIC)
Disposal during 2011 for Cupertino
Instate
Ton Total ADC
Notes:
1. Disposal tonnage is subject to change due to revisions. Report is based upon information provided by County disposal reports.
2. AIC information was not collected prior to 2006.
Print Date: 4/22/2014 10:16:22 AM
Destination Facility SWISNo Qtr
Transform
Ton Export Ton Total AIC
Altamont Landfill & Resource Recv`ry 01-AA-0009
Corinda Los Trancos Landfill ( Ox Mtn)41-AA-0002
Covanta Stanislaus, Inc.50-AA-0009 59
Forward Landfill, Inc.39-AA-0015
Guadalupe Sanitary Landfill 43-AN-0015
Kirby Canyon Recycl.& Disp. Facility 43-AN-0008
Monterey Peninsula Landfill 27-AA-0010
Newby Island Sanitary Landfill 43-AN-0003
Potrero Hills Landfill 48-AA-0075
Recology Hay Road 48-AA-0002
Tri Cities Recycling & Disposal Fac 01-AA-0008
Vasco Road Sanitary Landfill 01-AA-0010
Zanker Material Processing Facility 43-AN-0001
Zanker Road Class III Landfill 43-AN-0007
Yearly Totals:58.83.....27,593.28.282.08.
2
63 233
5
38
1
25,440
1,260
10
321 24
121
97 8
238 16
California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle)
Disposal Reporting System (DRS)
Jurisdiction Disposal By Facility
With Reported Alternative Daily Cover (ADC) and Alternative Intermediate Cover (AIC)
Disposal during 2012 for Cupertino
Instate
Ton Total ADC
Landfill Name:Newby Island
State:CA k Value:0.020
City/County:Milpitas M Value:6
Year CH4 CO2
Model Output: Lanfill Characteristics
Year Opened:
If Closed, Year:
Model Output: Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions
(metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent)
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012 252 40
2013 497 79
2014 487 78
2015 477 76
2016 468 75
2017 458 73
2018 449 72
2019 440 70
2020 432 69
1962
1964
1966
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
SAN JOSE INTL AP, CALIFORNIA
Period of Record General Climate Summary - Temperature
Station:(047824) SAN JOSE INTL AP
From Year=1998 To Year=2012
Monthly
Averages Daily Extremes Monthly Extremes Max.
Temp.
Max.Min.MeanHighDateLowDate Highest
Mean Year Lowest
Mean Year >=
90 F
<=
32 F
F F F F
dd/yyyy
or
yyyymmdd
F
dd/yyyy
or
yyyymmdd
F - F - #
Days
#
Day
January 59.0 41.4 50.2 77 12/2009 27 14/2007 54.9 2003 47.4 2002 0.0 0.
February 61.5 43.5 52.5 79 22/2002 31 11/1999 54.3 2005 50.1 1999 0.0 0.
March 65.3 45.6 55.4 86 11/2005 34 10/2009 60.1 2004 51.1 2006 0.0 0.
April 67.7 47.5 57.6 95 20/2009 36 09/1999 61.3 2004 54.7 2001 0.5 0.
May 73.5 51.8 62.6 99 30/2001 42 08/1999 67.7 2001 58.4 1999 1.1 0.
June 78.2 55.5 66.8 106 14/2000 45 08/1999 68.9 2006 64.1 1999 2.8 0.
July 80.4 57.9 69.1 104 23/2006 50 04/1999 73.1 2006 66.8 2000 3.0 0.
August 80.6 58.0 69.3 102 24/2010 51 15/1999 71.2 1998 67.6 1999 3.1 0.
September 80.4 56.9 68.6 99 04/2008 46 30/2007 70.6 2009 65.7 2012 4.7 0.
October 74.3 52.5 63.4 96 02/2012 41 31/2002 65.5 2003 60.6 1998 0.7 0.
November 65.4 45.9 55.7 85 04/2010 32 26/2010 59.2 2008 52.0 2000 0.0 0.
December 59.2 41.7 50.4 75 20/1999 24 24/1998 53.5 2005 45.9 1998 0.0 0.
Annual 70.4 49.8 60.1 106 20000614 24 19981224 60.8 2004 58.7 1999 15.9 0.
Winter 59.9 42.2 51.1 79 20020222 24 19981224 53.1 2003 48.4 1999 0.0 0.
Spring 68.8 48.3 58.5 99 20010530 34 20090310 61.5 2004 55.3 1999 1.6 0.
Summer 79.7 57.1 68.4 106 20000614 45 19990608 70.2 2006 66.3 1999 8.9 0.
Fall 73.4 51.8 62.6 99 20080904 32 20101126 64.6 2008 61.1 2000 5.4 0.
Table updated on Oct 31, 2012
For monthly and annual means, thresholds, and sums:
Months with 5 or more missing days are not considered
Years with 1 or more missing months are not considered
Seasons are climatological not calendar seasons
Winter = Dec., Jan., and Feb. Spring = Mar., Apr., and May
Summer = Jun., Jul., and Aug. Fall = Sep., Oct., and Nov.
Page 1of 2SAN JOSE INTL AP, CALIFORNIA Period of Record General Climate Summary -Tem...
4/23/2014http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliGCStT.pl?ca7824
SAN JOSE INTL AP, CALIFORNIA (047824)
Period of Record Monthly Climate Summary
Period of Record : 7/ 4/1998 to 9/30/2012
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecAnnual
Average Max.
Temperature (F) 59.0 61.5 65.3 67.7 73.5 78.2 80.4 80.6 80.4 74.3 65.4 59.2 70.4
Average Min.
Temperature (F) 41.4 43.5 45.6 47.5 51.8 55.5 57.9 58.0 56.9 52.5 45.9 41.7 49.8
Average Total
Precipitation (in.) 2.31 2.68 1.79 1.19 0.28 0.16 0.00 0.01 0.05 0.70 1.11 2.09 12.37
Average Total
SnowFall (in.) No Data
Average Snow
Depth (in.) No Data
Percent of possible observations for period of record.
Page 1of 1SAN JOSE INTL AP, CALIFORNIA Period of Record Monthly Climate Summary
4/23/2014http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliRECtM.pl?ca7824
Criteria Air Pollutant and GHG Emissions
Energy
Community Wide GHG Inventory Report for CUPERTINO 2005 to 2012
Provided to:Representative
from CUPERTINO
Date:10/15/2013
Provided by
(PG&E
Representative):
John Joseph
Green Communities and Innovator Pilots
Contact
Information
GHGDataRequests@pge.com
TOTCITY YEAR CATEGORY
RES ELEC
USE(KWH)
COM ELEC
USE(KWH)
IND ELEC
USE(KWH) IND ELEC 1515
Direct Access
KWH
RES GAS
USE(THM)
COM GAS
USE(THM)
IND GAS
USE(THM) IND GAS 1515
CUPERTINO 2010 NONGOVENT 124,926,651 257,959,267 FAIL ZZZZZ 9,394,725 5,609,575 FAIL
CUPERTINO 2010 (3) COUNTY 1,347,698 15,035
CUPERTINO 2010 (5) DISTRICT 9,567,891 735,714 9,946,165 306,729 424,640
Total 2010 non-City 124,926,651 268,874,856 735,714 9,946,165 9,394,725 5,931,339 424,640
CUPERTINO 2010 (4) CITY 4,835,738 54,795
Total 2010 with City 124,926,651 273,710,594 735,714 0 9,946,165 9,394,725 5,986,134 424,640
CUPERTINO 2011 NONGOVENT 123,912,651 237,689,803 FAIL ZZZZZ 9,887,698 5,787,989 FAIL
CUPERTINO 2011 (3) COUNTY 1,314,887 14,507
CUPERTINO 2011 (5) DISTRICT 8,025,999 10,406,047 363,262 513,099
Total 2011 non-City 123,912,651 247,030,689 0 10,406,047 9,887,698 6,165,758 513,099
CUPERTINO 2011 (4) CITY 3,854,940 50,926
Total 2011 with City 123,912,651 250,885,629 0 0 10,406,047 9,887,698 6,216,684 513,099
CUPERTINO 2012 NONGOVENT 120,198,157 184,187,844 FAIL ZZZZZ 9,130,072 5,503,635 FAIL
CUPERTINO 2012 (3) COUNTY 886 1,322,351 12,726
CUPERTINO 2012 (5) DISTRICT 8,011,814 343,319 8,303,042 373,407 456,082
Total 2012 non-City 120,199,043 193,522,009 343,319 8,303,042 9,130,072 5,889,768 456,082
CUPERTINO 2012 (4) CITY 3,718,871 44,188
Total 2012 with City 120,199,043 197,240,880 343,319 0 8,303,042 9,130,072 5,933,956 456,082
2010-2012 average Kwh 3-yr Avg Therms 3-yr Avg
Residential 123,012,782 9,470,832
Commercial + Industrial 236,835,529 6,460,229
City 4,136,516 49,970
Direct Access 9,551,751 NA
Total 373,536,578 15,981,030
Energy
Energy Emission Factors
CO2e
lbs CO2/MWH MTons CO2/MWh CH4 MTons/MWH N2O MTons/MWH MTons/MWh
2005 489 0.222 0.000013 0.000005 0.224
2006 456 0.207 0.000013 0.000005 0.209
2007 636 0.288 0.000013 0.000005 0.290
2008 641 0.291 0.000013 0.000005 0.293
2009 575 0.261 0.000013 0.000005 0.263
2010 445 0.202 0.000013 0.000005 0.204
2011 393 0.178 0.000013 0.000005 0.180
2012 453 0.205 0.000013 0.000005 0.207
3-Year Average (2010-2012) based on PG&E 430 0.195 0.000013 0.000005 0.197
2020 (CO2)3 290 0.132 0.000013 0.000005 0.133
1 Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) 2014.
2 CH4 and N2O intensity based on California E-Grid data (CH4 = 0.029 lbs/MWH; N2O = 0.011 lbs/MWH)
3
Natural Gas CO2e
lbs CO2/Therm MTons CO2/Therm CH4 MTons/Therm N2O MTons/Therm MTons/Therm
All Years 11.7 0.00530 5.E-07 1.E-08 0.00532
Direct Access Energy Factors
CO2e
CO2 MTons/MWH1 CH4 MTons/MWH2 N2O MTons/MWH2 MTons/MWh
2008 0.460 0.000013 0.000005 0.462
ABAU Carbon Intensity for Direct Access Energy
2010 2020 CO2e
Assumed Percent Renewable 15.4%33%MTons/MWh
CO2e MTons/Mwh without Renewable 0.546 0.366
Intensity factor
Intensity factor 1, 2
Source:
Source: CO2, CH4 and N2O intensity based on Table G.3 of the LGOP for residential and non-residential (CO2, 53.02 kg/Mmbtu; CH4: 0.005 kg/MMBtu; N2O: 0.0001 kg/MMBtu)
Source: California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). California RPS Procurement Summary 2003-20010. http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUC/energy/Renewables/index.htm
Intensity factor
Source 1: California Public Utilities Commission. 2010, September 13. WCI Final Default Emission Factor Calculator 2008 Data, Version 2. WECC Region.
Based on the 3 public utilities (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E) RPS in 2008-2010 average. Municipal energy and other energy providers typically have higher carbon intensity and lower RPS (higher carbon intensity = a
portfolio with higher percentage of coal and gas, and less renewables). Therefore, this is a conservative assumption. Note: this is higher than PG&E's 2020 carbon intensity.
Source 2: CH4 and N2O intensity based on California E-Grid data (CH4 = 0.029 lbs/MWH; N2O = 0.011 lbs/MWH) identified in the LGOP
The 2020 emissions rate is estimated by PG&E. It includes reductions from 33% Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), Cap-and-Trade, and
other regulatory reductions for High Global Warming Potential (HGWP) gases such as reductions of SF6. Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E). 2011,
April. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Factors Info
Sheet.http://www.pge.com/includes/docs/pdfs/shared/environment/calculator/pge_ghg_emission_factor_info_sheet.pdf
GHG Emissions from Energy Use
CEQA Baseline
Proposed Project
(Alt C)AB 32 Target Year Reduced Intensity Reduced Intensity No Project Scenario
Electricity 2013 2040 2020 2040 Alt A 2040 Alt B Current GP
Residential Electricity 24,236 29,243 25,534 26,382 27,991 26,382
Commercial + Industrial 46,661 75,378 54,106 55,531 66,604 52,558
City 815 1,099 889 917 1,019 901
Direct Access 4,415 7,132 5,119 5,254 6,302 4,973
Total 76,127 112,852 85,648 88,085 101,916 84,814
CEQA Baseline
Proposed Project
(Alt C)AB 32 Target Year Reduced Intensity Reduced Intensity No Project Scenario
Natural Gas 2013 2040 2020 2040 Alt A 2040 Alt B Current GP
Residential Electricity 50,343 60,744 53,040 54,801 58,144 54,801
Commercial + Industrial 34,340 55,474 39,819 40,868 49,017 38,680
City 266 358 290 299 332 294
Total 84,949 116,576 93,148 95,968 107,493 93,775
CEQA Baseline
Proposed Project
(Alt C)AB 32 Target Year Reduced Intensity Reduced Intensity No Project Scenario
Summary 2013 2040 2020 2040 Alt A 2040 Alt B Current GP
Residential Total 74,579 89,987 78,574 81,183 86,136 81,183
Commercial + Industrial Total 81,001 130,852 93,925 96,399 115,620 91,237
City Total 1,081 1,457 1,178 1,216 1,351 1,194
Direct Access 4,415 7,132 5,119 5,254 6,302 4,973
Total 161,076 229,428 178,797 184,053 209,409 178,588
MTCO2e/Year
MTCO2e/Year
MTCO2e/Year
GHG Emissions from Energy Use - Adjusted for Lower Carbon Intensity in 2020
Proposed Project
(Alt C)AB 32 Target Year Reduced Intensity Reduced Intensity No Project Scenario
Electricity 2040 2020 2040 Alt A 2040 Alt B Current GP
Residential Electricity 19,795 17,284 17,858 18,948 17,858
Commercial + Industrial 51,024 36,625 37,590 45,085 35,577
City 744 601 621 690 610
Direct Access 5,648 4,054 4,161 4,991 3,938
Total 77,212 58,565 60,230 69,713 57,984
Proposed Project
(Alt C)AB 32 Target Year Reduced Intensity Reduced Intensity No Project Scenario
Summary 2040 2020 2040 Alt A 2040 Alt B Current GP
Residential Total 80,539 70,324 72,660 77,092 72,660
Commercial + Industrial Total 106,499 76,444 78,457 94,102 74,257
City Total 1,102 891 920 1,022 903
Direct Access 5,648 4,054 4,161 4,991 3,938
Total 193,788 151,714 156,198 177,206 151,758
General Conversion Factors
lbs to kg 0.4536
kg to MTons 0.001
Mmbtu to Therm 0.1
kilowatt hrs to megawatt hrs 0.001
lbs to Tons 2000
Tons to MTon 0.9071847
Global Warming
Potentials (GWP)
CO2 1
CH4 21
N2O 310
Therms to kwh 29.30711111
MTCO2e/Year
MTCO2e/Year
Source: California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2010. Local Government Operations Protocol. Version 1.1. Appendix F,
Standard Conversion Factors
Source: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2001. Third Assessment Report: Climate Change 2011.
Criteria Air Pollutants from Natural Gas
Rate
Natural Gas ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Residential 0.01078431 0.09215686 0.03921569 0.00058824 0.00745098 0.00745098
Non-Residential 0.01078431 0.09803922 0.08235294 0.00058824 0.00745098 0.00745098
Source: CalEEMod Version 2011.1.1.
Natural Gas
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Residential 28 239 102 2 19 19
Commercial + Industrial 19 174 146 1 13 13
City 0 1 1 0 0 0
Total 47 414 249 3 33 33
Natural Gas
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Residential 34 289 123 2 23 23
Commercial + Industrial 31 280 235 2 21 21
City 0 2 2 0 0 0
Total 65 571 360 4 45 45
Increase from Baseline 18 157 111 1 12 12
Natural Gas
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Residential 30 260 111 2 21 21
Commercial + Industrial 23 207 173 1 16 16
City 0 2 1 0 0 0
Total 53 468 286 3 37 37
Increase from Baseline 36 312 174 2 25 25
Natural Gas
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Residential 32 276 118 2 22 22
Commercial + Industrial 27 248 208 1 19 19
City 0 2 1 0 0 0
Total 60 526 327 3 41 41
Increase from Baseline 24 214 153 1 17 17
Natural Gas
ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Residential 30 260 111 2 21 21
Commercial + Industrial 21 195 164 1 15 15
City 0 1 1 0 0 0
Total 52 457 276 3 36 36
Increase from Baseline 28 243 124 2 19 19
General Conversion Factors
Mmbtu to Therm 0.1
lbs to Tons 2000
Tons to MTon 0.9071847
lbs/MBTU
2013 lbs/day
2040 Project lbs/day
Source: California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2010. Local Government Operations
Protocol. Version 1.1. Appendix F, Standard Conversion Factors
2040 Alt A Project lbs/day
2040 Alt B Project lbs/day
Current General Plan Project lbs/day
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
1
Greenhouse Gas Emission Factors:
Guidance for PG&E Customers
April 2013
In recent years, an increasing number of PG&E customers have started to track the
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from their business operations, generated within
their city, or saved through energy efficiency. This document is intended to help
PG&E customers understand the different emission factors they can use to estimate
GHG emissions for their own climate action planning or voluntary GHG emissions
tracking or reporting. PG&E’s latest GHG emission factor for delivered electricity is
available online.
Please note: The information in this document is not to be used for mandatory GHG
reporting, financial analysis, or regulatory compliance, and does not necessarily
reflect the approaches taken by PG&E for its own regulatory compliance purposes.
What is a GHG emission factor?
A GHG emission factor1 is a measure of the pounds of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted
per megawatt-hour of electricity or per therm of natural gas.
Electricity generated from fossil fuels such as natural gas or coal emit CO2, while
other sources of electricity such as hydropower, wind, solar, and nucle ar power
are considered to be carbon-free. The electricity that PG&E delivers to customers
comes from a mix of these generation sources. PG&E’s emission factor for
delivered electricity incorporates the annual energy and associated emissions from
each generation source for the given year. Variance in PG&E’s mix of electricity
sources largely account for changes in PG&E’s GHG emission factor from year to
year.
The natural gas emission factor represents the amount of GHGs emitted per therm
of natural gas combusted. This emission factor does not vary because the
composition of PG&E’s natural gas does not change significantly over time.
Electricity Emission Factors
If you are estimating the GHG emissions generated by a business, city, county, or
related entity over the course of a year, and if 100% of your electricity was purchased
from PG&E, you can use the average emission factor for all the PG&E electricity
delivered during that specific year.
Historic emissions: Historic average emissions factors take into account all of the
sources of electricity that PG&E delivered to customers during a specific year in the
past. As a founding member of the California Climate Action Registry (CCAR), PG&E
1 An emission factor is also known as an emission rate or emission coefficient.
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
2
has emission factors that have been third-party verified starting in the year 2003. For
factors prior to 2003, please see FAQ #2.
Current/Future emissions: Because of the multiple sources of power used in the
course of a year and the rigorous process PG&E follows to have its emissions
independently verified by a third party, the emission factor for delivered electricity
lags by a year. To estimate GHG emissions in a recent or future year for which an
emission factor is not yet available, use the emissions factor forecast for PG&E’s
electricity in the CPUC GHG Calculator. The calculator is a publicly-available
document that provides emission factor forecasts from 2012–2020 which are listed in
the table below.
Avoided emissions: When you implement an energy efficiency project or install a
renewable generation project (e.g., a solar photovoltaic system), you are reducing
your use of electricity from the utility, and therefore are avoiding the associated GHG
emissions. Determining the emissions avoided from these projects can be
complicated, depending on the season and time of day the electricity was saved.
For simplicity, you can use the relevant annual emission factor to estimate the GHGs
avoided from these projects. See FAQ #5 for more information.
PG&E Emissions Factor Summary
Emission Type Emission Factor Source
Year Lbs CO2
/MWh
Metric tons
CO2/MWh
Historical
Emissions
2003 620 0.281 PG&E’s third-party-verified
GHG inventory submitted to
the California Climate Action
Registry (CCAR)2 (2003-2008)
or The Climate Registry
(TCR) (2009-2011)
2004 566 0.257
2005 489 0.222
2006 456 0.207
2007 636 0.288
2008 641 0.291
2009 575 0.261
2010 445 0.202
2011 393 0.178
Future Emissions
(estimated)
20123 453 0.205 CPUC GHG Calculator, which
provides an independent
forecast of PG&E’s emission
factors as part of a model on
how the electricity sector
2013 431 0.196
2014 412 0.187
2015 391 0.177
2016 370 0.168
2 The 2003-2008 factors are in the Power/Utility Protocol (PUP) spreadsheet of PG&E’s CCAR reports. The
2009-2011factors are in the Additional Optional Information tab of the Electric Power Sector (EPS) Report
spreadsheet of PG&E’s TCR report.
3 PG&E’s actual 2012 emission factor will be available in January 2014.
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
3
2017 349 0.158 would reduce emissions
under AB 324 2018 328 0.149
2019 307 0.139
2020 290 0.131
Natural Gas Emission Factors
Historic, Current, and/or Future: The combustion of natural gas (in your stove, a
furnace, or a natural gas power plant) releases CO2. The emission factor for natural
gas represents the amount of GHGs emitted per therm of natural gas combusted.
Since the composition of PG&E natural gas does not change significantly over time,
this factor does not change from year to year.
Emission Type Emission Factor Source
Year Lbs
CO2/therm
Metric ton
CO2/therm
Historic, Current,
or Future
All
years
11.7 0.00531 U.S. Energy Information
Administration5
UPDATES: The emissions factors will be updated annually, so please check with your
PG&E account manager or the PG&E website at www.pge.com/environment for the
most recent version.
Frequently Asked Questions:
1. Why do the emission factors for PG&E electricity vary from year to year? .............. 4
2. Does PG&E have emission factors from years prior to 2003? ....................................... 4
3. What emission factor should I use to calculate the emissions from electr icity use
in 1990? ................................................................................................................................. 4
4. Why do you use an average emission factor to estimate avoided emissions and not
a marginal or project-specific emission factor? ............................................................ 5
5. What emission factor should I use if I want to estimate the emissions avoided
through participation in PG&E’s demand response programs? ................................... 5
6. If I am a direct access electricity customer, what emission factor should I use? .... 5
7. Can PG&E customers use the U.S. EPA carbon calculator to calculate the
emissions from PG&E electricity? ..................................................................................... 5
8. What is the difference between the emission factors used in the U.S. EPA’s
Portfolio Manager benchmarking tool and PG&E’s emission factors?........................ 6
9. Does PG&E have emission factors for smaller geographic areas like cities or
counties within its service territory? ............................................................................... 6
10. What measures can I use to compare a reduction of one metric tonne of CO 2? ..... 6
11. Why are PG&E’s emission factors in CO2 and not CO2e (i.e. CO2 equivalent)? ........ 7
4 E3, GHG Calculator version 3c, worksheet tab “CO2 Allocations,” cells AH35 - AH44.
5 U.S. Energy Information Administration, Voluntary Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Program.
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
4
12. Why don’t PG&E’s emission factors include the emissions associated with the
delivery of electricity or natural gas? ............................................................................. 7
13. Who can I contact at PG&E to ask questions about emission factors? ...................... 7
1. Q: Why do the emission factors for PG&E electricity vary from year to year?
A: PG&E’s electricity emission factors vary primarily because the amount of
available hydroelectricity varies from year to year. During drought years, less
hydroelectricity is available and other power sources (usually natural gas
generation) are used instead.
Emission factors also change, but less significantly, based on variables such as
change in demand due to weather (hot summers mean more air conditioning
demand). Increased demand on a short-term basis is generally met by fossil
fuel generation, which raises the average emission factor. PG&E works to
mitigate demand by following California’s “loading order,” which involves
reducing electricity demand by increasing energy efficiency and demand
response, and meeting new long-term generation needs first with renewable
and distributed generation resources, and second with clean fossil -fueled
generation. The loading order was adopted in the 2003 Energy Action Plan
prepared by the California energy agencies6.
Over time, PG&E’s emission factor is also decreasing as we make steady
progress toward California’s target of 33% renewables by the end of 2020.
2. Q: Does PG&E have emission factors from years prior to 2003?
A: PG&E was among the earliest companies to voluntarily quantify and report its
GHG emissions using rigorous, publicly-vetted GHG reporting standards. As a
charter member of the California Climate Action Registry which later grew into
The Climate Registry, PG&E has voluntarily registered and publicly reported its
third-party verified GHG inventory every year since 2003. Prior to 2003, there
were no commonly-accepted guidelines to report the GHG emission factors
from a utility. If you would like to calculate emissions prior to 2003, you can
use the 1990 emission factor in FAQ #3 below.
3. Q: What emission factor should I use to calculate the emissions from electricity
use in 1990?
A: You can use the factor from a study published by Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory, which cites an emission factor of 0.070 kg C/kWh for PG&E in
1990.7 This figure translates to approximately 572 lbs CO2/MWh or 0.259 metric
tons CO2/MWh.8
6 Implementing California’s Loading Order for Electricity Resources.
7 LBNL-49945, Marnay et al, Estimating the CO2 emissions factors for the California Electric Power Sector,
August 2002.
8 Assuming 1 kg CO2 = 0.27 kg C and 2.2046 lbs/kg.
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
5
4. Q:Why do you use an average emission factor to estimate avoided emissions and
not a marginal9 or project-specific emission factor?
A: For the purposes of climate action planning or voluntary tracking and reporting,
using an average emission factor simplifies the emissions calculation process.
While some large entities may be required to estimate the amount of GHGs
avoided by using emission factors specific to the hours of the day, the days of
the year, or the seasons in which the energy use was avoided , the use of an
average emission factor is appropriate for most customers.
5. Q: What emission factor should I use if I want to estimate the emissions avoided
through participation in PG&E’s demand response programs10?
A: For the purposes of climate action planning or voluntary tracking or reporting,
an average emission factor is appropriate. If you are participating in a third-
party Demand Response program, you may reach out to your program manager
for further guidance. Using the average factor is a simplification and may not
reflect the approach taken by large entities for regulatory compliance
purposes.
6. Q: If I am a direct access electricity customer, what emission factor should I use?
A: If you are a direct access customer, you should contact your direct access
electricity provider for the appropriate emission factor. If the emission factor
is unavailable, The Climate Registry’s Local Government Operations Protocol
and the World Resources Institute’s GHG Protocol recommend using the EPA
Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID) annual output
emission factors for the WECC California (CAMX) sub-region.
7. Q: Can PG&E customers use the U.S. EPA carbon calculator to calculate the
emissions from PG&E electricity?
A: PG&E does not recommend that customers use this calculator. The EPA
calculator uses an average emission factor for electricity generated
nationwide. PG&E’s emission factor is independently verified and based on the
PG&E-specific mix of electricity delivered to PG&E customers. Because of
PG&E’s higher use of lower- and zero-emission generation sources, PG&E’s
emission factor is more than 60 percent cleaner than the national average.11
Using the EPA carbon calculator would dramatically overstate PG&E customers’
emissions and any emissions savings associated with energy efficiency projects.
9 A marginal emission factor represents the emissions from electricity generated “at the margin”, i.e.,
electricity generated in response to an additional unit of electricity demand. In California, this factor is
typically that of a natural gas power plant, because this type of plant is most frequently deployed when
electricity demand increases in the state. The California Air Resources Board (ARB) uses a marginal
emission factor for California of 944 lbs CO2e/MWh. See: ARB, Mandatory Reporting Requirement Final
Regulation, Section 95111(b)(1).
10 PG&E’s demand response programs offer incentives to customers that volunteer and participate by
temporarily reducing their electricity use when demand could outpace supply.
11 PG&E website: http://www.pge.com/myhome/environment/pge/cleanenergy/index.shtml.
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
6
8. Q: What is the difference between the emission factors used in the U.S. EPA’s
Portfolio Manager benchmarking tool and PG&E’s emission factors?
A: The EPA tool uses emission factors from the EPA Emissions & Generation
Resource Integrated Database (eGRID), which are derived from utility data for
each of the 26 sub-regions of the U.S. power grid. Users are not able to enter a
PG&E-specific emission factor into the tool. Instead, based on the zip code of
each building entered, Portfolio Manager identifies the appropriate sub -region
and emission factor, and provides a graphic comparison of the sub-region’s
emission factor and electric generation fuel mix to the national factor. PG&E
customers are in the WECC12 California (CAMX) sub-region. Because eGRID’s
WECC California emission factor has consistently been higher than PG&E’s
historic emission factors, customers should understand that this tool
overestimates emissions from buildings that use PG&E electricity.
The tool also gives users the choice of selecting a specific power generation
facility, which is not generally appropriate for the purposes of climate action
planning or voluntary tracking and reporting, since the electricity delivered by
PG&E to customers comes from a variety of sources.
9. Q: Does PG&E have emission factors for smaller geographic areas like cities or
counties within its service territory?
A: No, PG&E’s emission factor is based on the electricity delivered to all of its
customers. Because electricity enters PG&E’s electrical transmission and
distribution system from multiple sources and gets distributed throughout the
system to customers, it is not possible to calculate emission factors for specific
geographic areas.
10. Q: What measures can I use to compare a reduction of one metric tonne of CO 2?
A: Reducing one metric ton (2204.6 lbs) of CO2 is approximately equivalent to:
Taking 0.21 of an average passenger car in California off the road for a year
in 2011;13
Avoiding the use of 112 gallons of gasoline;14 or
Eliminating the GHGs associated with about 3.3 homes in PG&E’s service
territory for a month.15
12 The Western Energy Coordinating Council (WECC) is a regional organization that promotes reliable electric
service by establishing operating criteria and facilitating electric system support between utilities.
13 California Air Resources Board’s EMFAC 2011 model indicates an average passenger car in California in
2011 emitted 4.76 metric tons (5.24 short tons) of CO2 per car per year.
14 U.S. EPA website: http://www.epa.gov/cleanenergy/energy-resources/refs.html#gasoline.
15 In PG&E’s service territory in 2011, the average residential customer consumed 0.584 MWh and 38 therms
per month. 0.584 MWh/home times 0.178 metric tonnes (MT) CO2/MWh in 2011 is approximately 0.104 MT
of CO2 per home each month for electricty. 38 therms/home times 0.00531 MT of CO2 per therm is
approximately 0.202 MT of CO2 per month. Combined energy use per house accounts for about 0.306 MT
per month. Therefore, reducing 1 MT of CO2 is equivalent to reducing the emissions for about 3.3 homes
per month.
FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY
7
11. Q: Why are PG&E’s emission factors in CO2 (carbon dioxide) and not CO2e (i.e. CO2
equivalent)?16
A: The electricity emission factors reported via CCAR and TCR are in pounds of CO2
and not CO2e because their methodology for calculating emission factors only
includes CO2 and not methane (CH4) or nitrous oxide (N2O) from electricity
generation. CCAR and TCR do not include CH4 or N2O because these emissions
are considered to be de minimis.
However, PG&E customers can still estimate the CH4 and N2O emissions
associated with their electricity use by using the California-specific emission
factors provided by The Climate Registry’s Local Government Operations
Protocol17. For natural gas, customers can use the relevant default emission
factors for natural gas provided by the same protocol18.
12. Q: Why don’t PG&E’s emission factors include the emissions associated with the
delivery of electricity or natural gas?
A: The emissions associated with the delivery of electricity or natural gas are not
included in PG&E’s emission factors for delivered electricity or natural gas
because those emissions are reported separately by PG&E in its own GHG
inventory. Standard voluntary reporting practice is to report such emissions,
like the emissions associated with transmission and distribution line losses,
natural gas compressor stations, and vehicles used to service electricity and
natural gas delivery systems, separately from the emissions attributed to the
generation or use of the energy itself.
13. Q: Who can I contact at PG&E to ask questions about emission factors?
A: Email ghgdatarequests@pge.com and a PG&E employee will get back to you
shortly.
16 CO2e or CO2 equivalent is a measure used to compare the emissions from various GHGs based upon their
global warming potential (GWP). The CO2e for a gas is derived by multiplying the amount of the gas by the
GWP of the gas.
17 Version 1.1, May 2010. Page 209, Table G.7: California Grid Average Electricity Emission Factors
(1990-2007).
18 Page 205, Table G.3: Default Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emission Factors by Fuel Type and Sector .
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Target (GWh)7,022 7,733 8,454 9,178 9,941 10,732 11,547 15,554
RPS-Eligible Procurement (GWh)8,686 8,660 8,707 9,118 9,044 9,817 11,493 13,760
RPS GWh as % of Bundled Sales 11.5%12.2%12.1%12.6%11.8%12.4%14.1%17.7%
Cumulative Deficit/Surplus (GWh)1,664 2,592 2,844 2,785 1,888 973 919 -876
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Target (GWh)11,254 11,960 12,690 13,440 14,228 15,023 15,833 15,028
RPS-Eligible Procurement (GWh)12,421 13,182 12,822 12,486 12,261 12,574 13,622 14,548
RPS GWh as % of Bundled Sales 16.6%18.7%17.6%16.6%15.5%15.8%16.8%19.4%
Cumulative Deficit/Surplus (GWh)1,167 2,390 2,522 1,569 -399 -2,848 -5,058 -5,538
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Target (GWh)296 447 605 765 933 1,104 1,278 3,257
RPS-Eligible Procurement (GWh)550 678 825 900 881 1,047 1,784 1,940
RPS GWh as % of Bundled Sales 3.7%4.5%5.2%5.6%5.2%6.1%10.2%11.9%
Cumulative Deficit/Surplus (GWh)254 485 706 841 788 732 1,239 -78
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Target (GWh)18,572 20,139 21,748 23,382 25,102 26,859 28,658 33,839
RPS-Eligible Procurement (GWh)21,657 22,520 22,354 22,504 22,185 23,438 26,900 30,249
RPS GWh as % of Bundled Sales 13.8%14.0%13.7%13.1%12.6%13.0%15.4%17.9%
Cumulative Deficit/Surplus (GWh)3,085 5,466 6,072 5,194 2,277 -1,143 -2,901 -6,492
15.4%
PG&E
SCE
SDG&E
TOTAL
2008 Default Emission Factor Pivot Table
Default Factor (metric tons CO2/MWh)0.46039
Transmission Loss Factor 8%
Capacity Factor Threshold for Marginal Plants 60%
NERC Region WECC
Marginal Y
Capped Jurisdiction N
Primary Fuel
State or Province Data DFO NG SUB Grand Total
AB Sum of Metric Tons CO2 1,184,359 1,039,187 2,223,546
Sum of Net Generation, MWh 3,543,530 719,541 4,263,070
Sum of Emission Factor 0.334 1.444 0.522
AZ Sum of Metric Tons CO2 1,129 12,250,641 12,251,770
Sum of Net Generation, MWh 966 30,285,859 30,286,825
Sum of Emission Factor 1.168 0.405 0.405
CO Sum of Metric Tons CO2 6,771 5,090,012 5,096,783
Sum of Net Generation, MWh 7,507 11,961,465 11,968,972
Sum of Emission Factor 0.902 0.426 0.426
ID Sum of Metric Tons CO2 110 639,648 639,758
Sum of Net Generation, MWh 120 1,599,718 1,599,838
Sum of Emission Factor 0.916 0.400 0.400
MT Sum of Metric Tons CO2 23,881 23,881
Sum of Net Generation, MWh 49,108 49,108
Sum of Emission Factor 0.486 0.486
NV Sum of Metric Tons CO2 7,810,593 7,810,593
Sum of Net Generation, MWh 18,529,250 18,529,250
Sum of Emission Factor 0.422 0.422
OR Sum of Metric Tons CO2 92,327 92,327
Sum of Net Generation, MWh 157,303 157,303
Sum of Emission Factor 0.587 0.587
SD Sum of Metric Tons CO2 17,514 171,626 189,140
Sum of Net Generation, MWh 27,283 120,570 147,853
Sum of Emission Factor 0.642 1.423 1.279
TX Sum of Metric Tons CO2 57 1,105,192 1,105,249
Sum of Net Generation, MWh 92 1,942,152 1,942,244
Sum of Emission Factor 0.623 0.569 0.569
UT Sum of Metric Tons CO2 18,193 2,965,018 2,983,211
Sum of Net Generation, MWh 25,764 7,093,902 7,119,666
Sum of Emission Factor 0.706 0.418 0.419
WA Sum of Metric Tons CO2 283 2,641,860 2,642,143
Sum of Net Generation, MWh 361 6,736,012 6,736,373
Sum of Emission Factor 0.784 0.392 0.392
WY Sum of Metric Tons CO2 352 42,840 43,191
Sum of Net Generation, MWh 468 71,299 71,767
Sum of Emission Factor 0.751 0.601 0.602
Total Sum of Metric Tons CO2 26,895 33,863,884 1,210,813 35,101,591
Total Sum of Net Generation, MWh 35,278 81,996,881 840,111 82,872,270
Total Sum of Emission Factor 0.762 0.413 1.441 0.424
Criteria Air Pollutant and GHG Emissions
On-Road Transportation
CUPERTINO— TRANSPORTATION SECTOR
VMT
Population Employment
Service
Population
(SP)Daily VMT*
Rate (VMT/
SP)
Adjusted
Daily VMT Annual VMT
2013 Full I-X Trip 58,302 27,387 85,689 897,419 10.47 897,420 311,404,740
Baseline 2040 Full I-X Trip 58,302 27,387 85,689 897,419 10.47 897,420 311,404,740
2020 Full I-X Trip 61,672 31,757 93,429 992,529 10.62 992,530 344,407,910
2040 Full I-X Trip 71,300 44,242 115,542 1,264,271 10.94 1,264,270 438,701,690
2040 Alt A Full I-X Trip 63,873 32,593 96,466 1,063,199 11.02 1,063,200 368,930,400
2040 Alt B Full I-X Trip 68,051 39,092 107,143 1,097,596 10.24 1,097,600 380,867,200
Current GP Full I-X Trip 63,873 30,848 94,721 997,145 10.53 997,150 346,011,050
CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
2013 Full I-X Trip 148 1,113 3,952 9 115 55
Baseline 2040 Full I-X Trip 54 307 1,377 9 105 46
2040 Full I-X Trip 76 433 1,939 13 148 65
2040 Alt A Full I-X Trip 64 364 1,631 11 124 54
2040 Alt B Full I-X Trip 66 376 1,684 11 128 56
Current GP Full I-X Trip 60 341 1,529 10 117 51
ROG NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5
2013 Full I-X Trip 26 193 686 2 20 10
Baseline 2040 Full I-X Trip 9 53 239 2 18 8
2040 Full I-X Trip 13 75 336 2 26 11
2040 Alt A Full I-X Trip 11 63 283 2 22 9
2040 Alt B Full I-X Trip 11 65 292 2 22 10
Current GP Full I-X Trip 10 59 265 2 20 9
GHG EMISSIONS
N2O CO2 CO2e N2O CO2 CO2e
2013 Full I-X Trip 6 121,791 123,518 6 114,846 116,573 -6%NA
2020 Full I-X Trip 3 136,341 137,284 3 103,755 104,699 -24%-10%
2040 Full I-X Trip 2 176,703 177,375 2 122,594 123,266 -31%6%
2040 Alt A Full I-X Trip 2 148,600 149,165 2 103,096 103,661 -31%-11%
2040 Alt B Full I-X Trip 2 153,408 153,991 2 106,432 107,015 -31%-8%
Current GP Full I-X Trip 2 139,369 139,898 2 96,692 97,221 -31%-17%
State and Federal Fuel Efficiency Improvements + Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)
Percent
Reduction
from 2013
Source: EMFAC2011-PL. Based on running exhaust emission rates. 2040 emissions rates are based on 2035 emission rates (the latest year for which rates are available).
Note: MTons = metric tons; CO2e = carbon dioxide-equivalent. Adjusted BAU Includes Pavley and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS).
Assembly Bill 1493 (AB 1493) Pavley I Fuel Efficiency Standards. In addition, the State of California has adopted the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS). In January 2012, the California Air
Resources Board (CARB) adopted the Advanced Clean Car Program which implements the Pavley II Fuel Efficiency Standards and projects that by 2025, one in every seven new cars sold
will be electric vehicles (PHEV or PEV). However, the Pavley II Advanced Clean Car Program is not included in the transportation emissions reductions and therefore reductions are
On December 29, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California issued several rulings in the federal lawsuits challenging the LCFS. One of the court’s rulings
preliminarily enjoins the CARB from enforcing the regulation during the pendency of the litigation. In January 2012, CARB appealed the decision and on April 23, 2012, the Night Circuit
Court granted CARB’s motion for a stay of the injunction while it continues to consider CARB’s appeal of the lower court’s decision.
Percent
Reduction
from BAU
Tons/year
Daily emissions multiplied by 347 days/year to account for reduced traffic on weekends and holidays. This assumption is consistent with the California Air Resources
Board's (CARB) methodology within the Climate Change Scoping Plan Measure Documentation Supplement.
Source: EMFAC2011-PL. Based on running exhaust, breakwear, and tirewear emission rates.2040 emissions rates are based on 2035 emission rates (the latest year
for which rates are available).
MTons/year - Business as Usual (BAU)MTons/year - Adjusted
City of Cupertino
Source: 2010 and 2035 VMT is based on data provided by Hexagon using the VTA model.
Adjusted Daily vehicles miles traveled (VMT) multiplied by 347 days/year to account for reduced traffic on weekends and holidays. This assumption is consistent with the California Air
Resources Board's (CARB) methodology within the Climate Change Scoping Plan Measure Documentation Supplement.
lbs/day
Year 2013
Based on EMFAC2011-PL
Emission year Daily
2013 897,420
Percent of
VMT Adjust % VMT ROG NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.5
All Other Buses 0.05%0.05%2.62E-01 7.81E+00 1.06E+00 1.14E-02 3.48E-01 2.49E-01
LDA 55.15%55.15%4.44E+01 1.57E+02 1.62E+03 3.62E+00 5.10E+01 2.14E+01
LDT1 5.83%5.83%1.30E+01 4.28E+01 4.19E+02 4.46E-01 5.69E+00 2.53E+00
LDT2 18.54%18.54%1.69E+01 9.28E+01 7.22E+02 1.66E+00 1.71E+01 7.13E+00
LHD1 3.02%3.02%6.39E+00 9.07E+01 8.32E+01 5.11E-01 3.99E+00 1.93E+00
LHD2 0.45%0.45%1.12E+00 2.16E+01 1.09E+01 6.38E-02 8.75E-01 4.51E-01
MCY 0.59%0.59%2.51E+01 1.43E+01 2.39E+02 2.31E-02 5.29E-01 2.13E-01
MDV 12.64%12.64%1.67E+01 9.86E+01 6.81E+02 1.44E+00 1.17E+01 4.92E+00
MH 0.18%0.18%7.39E-01 7.29E+00 2.25E+01 2.64E-02 2.86E-01 1.58E-01
Motor Coach 0.05%0.05%2.94E-01 1.02E+01 1.47E+00 1.67E-02 3.60E-01 2.59E-01
OBUS 0.08%0.08%1.88E-01 1.92E+00 3.76E+00 1.02E-02 6.80E-02 2.74E-02
PTO 0.04%0.04%6.37E-01 1.16E+01 2.98E+00 1.81E-02 3.58E-01 3.29E-01
SBUS 0.05%0.05%4.26E-01 8.02E+00 6.45E+00 1.17E-02 7.04E-01 3.59E-01
T6 Ag 0.01%0.01%6.57E-02 1.36E+00 2.61E-01 1.93E-03 7.69E-02 5.86E-02
T6 CAIRP heavy 0.00%0.00%1.72E-03 5.96E-02 7.41E-03 1.31E-04 2.86E-03 1.80E-03
T6 CAIRP small 0.00%0.00%5.67E-03 1.43E-01 2.43E-02 4.29E-04 9.46E-03 5.97E-03
T6 instate construction heavy 0.04%0.04%1.84E-01 5.67E+00 8.00E-01 8.43E-03 2.44E-01 1.71E-01
T6 instate construction small 0.10%0.10%3.97E-01 1.05E+01 1.73E+00 2.23E-02 5.87E-01 3.98E-01
T6 instate heavy 0.23%0.23%1.11E+00 3.38E+01 4.82E+00 5.24E-02 1.49E+00 1.04E+00
T6 instate small 0.63%0.63%2.42E+00 6.27E+01 1.05E+01 1.42E-01 3.63E+00 2.43E+00
T6 OOS heavy 0.00%0.00%9.84E-04 3.42E-02 4.25E-03 7.48E-05 1.64E-03 1.03E-03
T6 OOS small 0.00%0.00%3.25E-03 8.17E-02 1.39E-02 2.46E-04 5.43E-03 3.42E-03
T6 Public 0.03%0.03%2.31E-02 3.59E+00 9.88E-02 5.95E-03 8.84E-02 4.40E-02
T6 utility 0.00%0.00%9.22E-03 4.68E-01 4.09E-02 9.83E-04 2.13E-02 1.33E-02
T6TS 0.16%0.16%9.49E-01 6.68E+00 1.96E+01 2.24E-02 1.51E-01 6.30E-02
T7 Ag 0.02%0.02%2.59E-01 6.84E+00 1.50E+00 8.30E-03 2.61E-01 2.13E-01
T7 CAIRP 0.31%0.31%2.44E+00 4.98E+01 1.16E+01 1.01E-01 2.11E+00 1.61E+00
T7 CAIRP construction 0.03%0.03%2.44E-01 5.02E+00 1.16E+00 9.97E-03 2.11E-01 1.61E-01
T7 NNOOS 0.35%0.35%1.79E+00 3.13E+01 8.31E+00 1.13E-01 1.58E+00 1.08E+00
T7 NOOS 0.11%0.11%8.31E-01 1.82E+01 3.94E+00 3.68E-02 7.25E-01 5.46E-01
T7 other port 0.03%0.03%8.74E-02 8.88E+00 4.28E-01 1.10E-02 1.13E-01 6.84E-02
T7 POAK 0.14%0.14%3.52E-01 3.96E+01 1.76E+00 4.59E-02 4.70E-01 2.85E-01
T7 POLA 0.00%0.00%0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
T7 Public 0.02%0.02%2.65E-02 4.95E+00 1.47E-01 6.19E-03 5.65E-02 3.22E-02
T7 Single 0.19%0.19%1.27E+00 4.19E+01 7.04E+00 6.13E-02 1.29E+00 9.83E-01
T7 single construction 0.08%0.08%5.39E-01 1.80E+01 3.00E+00 2.58E-02 5.48E-01 4.20E-01
T7 SWCV 0.05%0.05%8.43E-02 1.15E+01 4.37E-01 1.67E-02 1.47E-01 8.14E-02
T7 tractor 0.56%0.56%5.43E+00 1.25E+02 2.89E+01 1.85E-01 4.80E+00 3.81E+00
T7 tractor construction 0.06%0.06%5.96E-01 1.36E+01 3.21E+00 1.92E-02 5.18E-01 4.14E-01
T7 utility 0.00%0.00%1.17E-02 6.19E-01 6.19E-02 9.94E-04 1.60E-02 1.14E-02
T7IS 0.03%0.03%6.03E-01 3.72E+00 1.77E+01 3.96E-03 2.83E-02 1.16E-02
UBUS 0.13%0.13%1.83E+00 4.39E+01 1.11E+01 6.03E-02 2.62E+00 1.44E+00
TOTAL 100%100%148 1,113 3,952 9 115 55
lbs/day
Based on the emission factors for Santa Clara County - San Francisco Bay Air Basin. % VMT based on EMFAC2011-SG for Santa Clara County.
Year 2013 MTons/Year
Based on EMFAC2011
Emission year Annual VMT GWP GWP
2013 310 1 MTons MTons
Percent of
VMT Adjust % VMT NOx N2O CO2 CO2e CO2w/Pavley +
LCF
CO2e w/ Pavley +
LCFS
All Other Buses 0.05%0.05%1.229492934 0 173.4771074 186 171.7423364 184
LDA 55.15%55.15%24.72126929 1 50452.58022 50,696 46208.65873 46,452
LDT1 5.83%5.83%6.736693302 0 6150.306682 6,217 5752.860427 5,819
LDT2 18.54%18.54%14.61300535 0 23170.84769 23,315 21899.46598 22,044
LHD1 3.02%3.02%14.27075745 0 4598.695903 4,739 4552.708944 4,693
LHD2 0.45%0.45%3.400440028 0 713.1393418 747 706.0079484 740
MCY 0.59%0.59%2.248220212 0 235.0188716 257 232.6686829 255
MDV 12.64%12.64%15.5273031 0 19989.02792 20,142 19177.46305 19,331
MH 0.18%0.18%1.146803464 0 308.5942514 320 305.5083088 317
Motor Coach 0.05%0.05%1.603903608 0 268.6227768 284 265.936549 282
OBUS 0.08%0.08%0.301908822 0 112.0688972 115 110.9482083 114
PTO 0.04%0.04%1.827624539 0 298.9403317 317 295.9509283 314
SBUS 0.05%0.05%1.261911296 0 154.9777634 167 153.4279857 166
T6 Ag 0.01%0.01%0.213975684 0 29.52865502 32 29.23336847 31
T6 CAIRP heavy 0.00%0.00%0.009387169 0 1.993378348 2 1.973444564 2
T6 CAIRP small 0.00%0.00%0.02243891 0 6.553832686 7 6.488294359 7
T6 instate construction heavy 0.04%0.04%0.892254017 0 128.6950863 137 127.4081354 136
T6 instate construction small 0.10%0.10%1.646044688 0 341.1341277 357 337.7227865 354
T6 instate heavy 0.23%0.23%5.321836741 0 800.8791825 853 792.8703907 845
T6 instate small 0.63%0.63%9.875915037 0 2173.150621 2,271 2151.419115 2,249
T6 OOS heavy 0.00%0.00%0.00538186 0 1.142845369 1 1.131416915 1
T6 OOS small 0.00%0.00%0.012864695 0 3.757448926 4 3.719874437 4
T6 Public 0.03%0.03%0.565458549 0 90.86272974 96 89.95410244 96
T6 utility 0.00%0.00%0.073712044 0 15.00936522 16 14.85927156 16
T6TS 0.16%0.16%1.051268923 0 242.8760109 253 240.4472508 251
T7 Ag 0.02%0.02%1.076347419 0 133.4674255 144 132.1327512 143
T7 CAIRP 0.31%0.31%7.845749549 0 1625.051774 1,702 1608.801256 1,686
T7 CAIRP construction 0.03%0.03%0.790798869 0 160.2257709 168 158.6235132 166
T7 NNOOS 0.35%0.35%4.924985628 0 1815.845226 1,864 1797.686774 1,846
T7 NOOS 0.11%0.11%2.857222619 0 592.2979293 620 586.37495 615
T7 other port 0.03%0.03%1.397212062 0 176.1712342 190 174.4095218 188
T7 POAK 0.14%0.14%6.239096985 0 737.3959393 799 730.0219799 792
T7 POLA 0.00%0.00%0 0 0 0 0 0
T7 Public 0.02%0.02%0.778700005 0 99.46839731 107 98.47371334 106
T7 Single 0.19%0.19%6.600249899 0 985.1860427 1,050 975.3341823 1,040
T7 single construction 0.08%0.08%2.826487539 0 414.2659121 442 410.123253 438
T7 SWCV 0.05%0.05%1.817536981 0 267.942585 286 265.2631592 283
T7 tractor 0.56%0.56%19.72725698 1 2971.42568 3,166 2941.711423 3,136
T7 tractor construction 0.06%0.06%2.139343824 0 309.0704744 330 305.9797697 327
T7 utility 0.00%0.00%0.097501488 0 15.97039226 17 15.81068834 17
T7IS 0.03%0.03%0.585557546 0 46.05181907 52 45.59130088 51
UBUS 0.13%0.13%6.905243252 0 979.1653477 1,047 969.3736942 1,037
TOTAL 100%100%175 6 121,791 123,518 114,846 116,573
311,404,740
N2O emissions were calculated using an off-model adjustment provided by CARB in AB 32 Technical Appendices. The off-model adjustment uses a linear regression correlating N2O with NOx. (N2O = 0.0167 + 0.0318 x NOx)
Daily vehicles miles traveled (VMT) multiplied by 347 days/year to account for reduced traffic on weekends and holidays. This assumption is consistent with the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) methodology within the Climate
Change Scoping Plan Measure Documentation Supplement.
Based on the emission factors for Santa Clara County - San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin
Santa Clara 2013 - all Model Years (40 MPH)
Region_Ty
pe Region CalYr Season Veh ROG_RUNEX NOx_RUNEX CO_RUNEX SOx_RUNEX PM10_RUN EX PM10_PMTW PM10_PMBW PM10_Total
PM2.5_RUN
EX PM2.5_PMTW PM2.5_PMBW PM2_5_Total CO2_RUNEX
CO2(Pavley I +
LCFS)_RUNEX
VMT from
EMFAC-SG %VMT
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual All Other Buses 2.64E-01 7.88E+00 1.07E+00 1.15E-02 2.09E-01 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 3.51E-01 1.92E-01 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 2.51E-01 1.11E+03 1.10E+03 21,939 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual LDA 4.07E-02 1.44E-01 1.49E+00 3.32E-03 2.01E-03 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.68E-02 1.83E-03 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.96E-02 2.94E+02 2.69E+02 24,151,415 55%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual LDT1 1.12E-01 3.71E-01 3.63E+00 3.86E-03 4.58E-03 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.93E-02 4.16E-03 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 2.19E-02 3.39E+02 3.17E+02 2,553,530 6%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual LDT2 4.60E-02 2.53E-01 1.97E+00 4.54E-03 1.86E-03 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.66E-02 1.70E-03 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.94E-02 4.01E+02 3.79E+02 8,118,006 19%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual LHD1 1.07E-01 1.52E+00 1.39E+00 8.55E-03 1.07E-02 9.03E-03 4.69E-02 6.67E-02 9.89E-03 2.26E-03 2.01E-02 3.23E-02 4.88E+02 4.84E+02 1,324,044 3%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual LHD2 1.25E-01 2.40E+00 1.22E+00 7.10E-03 2.09E-02 1.03E-02 6.63E-02 9.74E-02 1.92E-02 2.56E-03 2.84E-02 5.02E-02 5.04E+02 4.99E+02 198,826 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual MCY 2.16E+00 1.23E+00 2.06E+01 1.99E-03 7.53E-04 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.55E-02 5.98E-04 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.83E-02 1.28E+02 1.27E+02 257,247 1%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual MDV 6.66E-02 3.94E-01 2.72E+00 5.74E-03 2.10E-03 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.68E-02 1.93E-03 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.97E-02 5.08E+02 4.87E+02 5,535,965 13%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual MH 2.11E-01 2.08E+00 6.44E+00 7.55E-03 2.37E-02 8.54E-03 4.94E-02 8.17E-02 2.17E-02 2.14E-03 2.12E-02 4.51E-02 5.61E+02 5.55E+02 77,363 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual Motor Coach 2.94E-01 1.02E+01 1.47E+00 1.67E-02 2.17E-01 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 3.59E-01 2.00E-01 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 2.59E-01 1.71E+03 1.69E+03 22,148 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual OBUS 1.26E-01 1.28E+00 2.51E+00 6.83E-03 6.07E-04 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.54E-02 5.55E-04 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.83E-02 4.75E+02 4.70E+02 33,160 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual PTO 7.21E-01 1.31E+01 3.37E+00 2.05E-02 4.05E-01 4.05E-01 3.72E-01 3.72E-01 2.15E+03 2.13E+03 19,560 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual SBUS 3.98E-01 7.49E+00 6.02E+00 1.10E-02 1.14E-01 1.08E-02 5.34E-01 6.58E-01 1.04E-01 2.70E-03 2.29E-01 3.36E-01 9.20E+02 9.11E+02 23,684 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 Ag 3.89E-01 8.06E+00 1.55E+00 1.15E-02 3.13E-01 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 4.56E-01 2.88E-01 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 3.47E-01 1.11E+03 1.10E+03 3,735 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 CAIRP heavy 1.49E-01 5.19E+00 6.45E-01 1.14E-02 1.07E-01 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 2.49E-01 9.80E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 1.57E-01 1.10E+03 1.09E+03 254 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 CAIRP small 1.50E-01 3.76E+00 6.41E-01 1.13E-02 1.07E-01 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 2.50E-01 9.87E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 1.58E-01 1.10E+03 1.09E+03 839 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 instate construction heavy 2.48E-01 7.66E+00 1.08E+00 1.14E-02 1.87E-01 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 3.30E-01 1.72E-01 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 2.31E-01 1.10E+03 1.09E+03 16,383 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 instate construction small 2.02E-01 5.31E+00 8.79E-01 1.13E-02 1.56E-01 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 2.98E-01 1.43E-01 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 2.02E-01 1.10E+03 1.09E+03 43,605 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 instate heavy 2.40E-01 7.33E+00 1.05E+00 1.14E-02 1.80E-01 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 3.22E-01 1.66E-01 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 2.25E-01 1.10E+03 1.09E+03 102,042 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 instate small 1.92E-01 4.99E+00 8.38E-01 1.13E-02 1.47E-01 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 2.89E-01 1.35E-01 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 1.94E-01 1.10E+03 1.09E+03 278,050 1%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 OOS heavy 1.49E-01 5.19E+00 6.45E-01 1.14E-02 1.07E-01 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 2.49E-01 9.80E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 1.57E-01 1.10E+03 1.09E+03 146 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 OOS small 1.50E-01 3.76E+00 6.41E-01 1.13E-02 1.07E-01 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 2.50E-01 9.87E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 1.58E-01 1.10E+03 1.09E+03 481 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 Public 4.47E-02 6.94E+00 1.91E-01 1.15E-02 2.85E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.71E-01 2.62E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 8.50E-02 1.12E+03 1.10E+03 11,457 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 utility 1.06E-01 5.40E+00 4.72E-01 1.13E-02 1.03E-01 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 2.45E-01 9.48E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 1.54E-01 1.10E+03 1.09E+03 1,919 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6TS 2.92E-01 2.06E+00 6.05E+00 6.91E-03 1.84E-03 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.66E-02 1.64E-03 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.94E-02 4.75E+02 4.70E+02 71,864 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 Ag 5.25E-01 1.39E+01 3.04E+00 1.68E-02 4.32E-01 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 5.29E-01 3.97E-01 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 4.33E-01 1.72E+03 1.70E+03 10,919 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 CAIRP 4.02E-01 8.22E+00 1.91E+00 1.67E-02 2.49E-01 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 3.47E-01 2.29E-01 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 2.65E-01 1.70E+03 1.68E+03 134,294 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 CAIRP construction 4.09E-01 8.40E+00 1.95E+00 1.67E-02 2.55E-01 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 3.53E-01 2.34E-01 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 2.70E-01 1.70E+03 1.69E+03 13,235 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 NNOOS 2.62E-01 4.58E+00 1.22E+00 1.65E-02 1.34E-01 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 2.31E-01 1.23E-01 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 1.58E-01 1.69E+03 1.67E+03 151,076 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 NOOS 3.76E-01 8.22E+00 1.78E+00 1.67E-02 2.30E-01 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 3.28E-01 2.12E-01 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 2.47E-01 1.70E+03 1.69E+03 48,906 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 other port 1.35E-01 1.37E+01 6.60E-01 1.69E-02 7.61E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.74E-01 7.00E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 1.06E-01 1.73E+03 1.71E+03 14,356 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 POAK 1.30E-01 1.46E+01 6.48E-01 1.69E-02 7.54E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.73E-01 6.94E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 1.05E-01 1.73E+03 1.71E+03 60,093 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 POLA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 Public 7.30E-02 1.36E+01 4.04E-01 1.70E-02 5.79E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.56E-01 5.33E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 8.87E-02 1.74E+03 1.72E+03 8,034 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 Single 3.44E-01 1.14E+01 1.91E+00 1.67E-02 2.52E-01 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 3.50E-01 2.32E-01 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 2.67E-01 1.70E+03 1.68E+03 81,448 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 single construction 3.48E-01 1.16E+01 1.94E+00 1.67E-02 2.56E-01 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 3.54E-01 2.36E-01 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 2.71E-01 1.70E+03 1.68E+03 34,238 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 SWCV 8.53E-02 1.17E+01 4.43E-01 1.69E-02 5.10E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.49E-01 4.69E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 8.24E-02 1.72E+03 1.71E+03 21,864 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 tractor 4.90E-01 1.13E+01 2.61E+00 1.67E-02 3.35E-01 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 4.33E-01 3.08E-01 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 3.44E-01 1.70E+03 1.69E+03 245,342 1%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 tractor construction 5.17E-01 1.18E+01 2.78E+00 1.67E-02 3.51E-01 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 4.49E-01 3.23E-01 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 3.59E-01 1.70E+03 1.69E+03 25,527 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 utility 1.95E-01 1.04E+01 1.04E+00 1.66E-02 1.70E-01 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 2.67E-01 1.56E-01 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 1.91E-01 1.70E+03 1.68E+03 1,323 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7IS 9.80E-01 6.04E+00 2.87E+01 6.43E-03 1.21E-03 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.60E-02 1.01E-03 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.88E-02 4.75E+02 4.70E+02 13,626 0%
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual UBUS 7.19E-01 1.72E+01 4.35E+00 2.37E-02 2.58E-01 8.00E-03 7.62E-01 1.03E+00 2.37E-01 2.00E-03 3.27E-01 5.66E-01 2.44E+03 2.42E+03 56,379 0%
43,788,322 100%
g/mile
Santa Clara 2013 - all Model Years (40 MPH)
Region_Ty
pe Region CalYr Season Veh
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual All Other Buses
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual LDA
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual LDT1
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual LDT2
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual LHD1
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual LHD2
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual MCY
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual MDV
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual MH
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual Motor Coach
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual OBUS
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual PTO
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual SBUS
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 Ag
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 CAIRP heavy
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 CAIRP small
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 instate construction heavy
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 instate construction small
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 instate heavy
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 instate small
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 OOS heavy
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 OOS small
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 Public
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 utility
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6TS
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 Ag
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 CAIRP
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 CAIRP construction
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 NNOOS
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 NOOS
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 other port
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 POAK
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 POLA
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 Public
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 Single
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 single construction
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 SWCV
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 tractor
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 tractor construction
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 utility
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7IS
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual UBUS
##
ROG_RUNEX NOx_RUNEX CO_RUNEX SOx_RUNEX PM10_PMTW PM10_PMBW PM10_RUNEX PM10_Total
PM2_5_PMT
W
PM2_5_PMB
W
PM2_5_RUNE
X PM2_5_Total CO2_RUNEX
CO2(Pavley I +
LCFS)_RUNEX
5.83E-04 1.74E-02 2.36E-03 2.53E-05 4.61E-04 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 7.74E-04 4.24E-04 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 5.54E-04 2.45E+00 2.43E+00
8.98E-05 3.17E-04 3.27E-03 7.32E-06 4.44E-06 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 1.03E-04 4.03E-06 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 4.32E-05 6.48E-01 5.93E-01
2.48E-04 8.18E-04 8.01E-03 8.52E-06 1.01E-05 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 1.09E-04 9.17E-06 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 4.83E-05 7.47E-01 6.98E-01
1.01E-04 5.58E-04 4.34E-03 1.00E-05 4.11E-06 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 1.03E-04 3.75E-06 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 4.29E-05 8.85E-01 8.36E-01
2.35E-04 3.34E-03 3.07E-03 1.88E-05 2.37E-05 1.99E-05 1.03E-04 1.47E-04 2.18E-05 4.97E-06 4.43E-05 7.11E-05 1.08E+00 1.07E+00
2.75E-04 5.30E-03 2.69E-03 1.57E-05 4.60E-05 2.26E-05 1.46E-04 2.15E-04 4.23E-05 5.65E-06 6.26E-05 1.11E-04 1.11E+00 1.10E+00
4.77E-03 2.71E-03 4.53E-02 4.39E-06 1.66E-06 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 1.00E-04 1.32E-06 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 4.04E-05 2.83E-01 2.80E-01
1.47E-04 8.69E-04 6.00E-03 1.27E-05 4.62E-06 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 1.03E-04 4.25E-06 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 4.34E-05 1.12E+00 1.07E+00
4.66E-04 4.60E-03 1.42E-02 1.66E-05 5.23E-05 1.88E-05 1.09E-04 1.80E-04 4.79E-05 4.71E-06 4.67E-05 9.94E-05 1.24E+00 1.22E+00
6.47E-04 2.24E-02 3.24E-03 3.68E-05 4.79E-04 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 7.92E-04 4.40E-04 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 5.70E-04 3.76E+00 3.72E+00
2.77E-04 2.82E-03 5.53E-03 1.50E-05 1.34E-06 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 1.00E-04 1.22E-06 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 4.04E-05 1.05E+00 1.04E+00
1.59E-03 2.90E-02 7.44E-03 4.53E-05 8.92E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 8.92E-04 8.21E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 8.21E-04 4.74E+00 4.69E+00
8.77E-04 1.65E-02 1.33E-02 2.42E-05 2.51E-04 2.38E-05 1.18E-03 1.45E-03 2.30E-04 5.96E-06 5.04E-04 7.41E-04 2.03E+00 2.01E+00
8.58E-04 1.78E-02 3.41E-03 2.53E-05 6.91E-04 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 1.00E-03 6.35E-04 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 7.65E-04 2.45E+00 2.43E+00
3.29E-04 1.14E-02 1.42E-03 2.50E-05 2.35E-04 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 5.49E-04 2.16E-04 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 3.46E-04 2.43E+00 2.40E+00
3.30E-04 8.29E-03 1.41E-03 2.50E-05 2.36E-04 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 5.50E-04 2.18E-04 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 3.47E-04 2.42E+00 2.40E+00
5.47E-04 1.69E-02 2.38E-03 2.51E-05 4.13E-04 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 7.27E-04 3.80E-04 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 5.10E-04 2.44E+00 2.41E+00
4.45E-04 1.17E-02 1.94E-03 2.50E-05 3.43E-04 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 6.57E-04 3.15E-04 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 4.45E-04 2.43E+00 2.40E+00
5.30E-04 1.62E-02 2.31E-03 2.51E-05 3.97E-04 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 7.11E-04 3.65E-04 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 4.95E-04 2.43E+00 2.41E+00
4.24E-04 1.10E-02 1.85E-03 2.50E-05 3.23E-04 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 6.37E-04 2.97E-04 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 4.27E-04 2.42E+00 2.40E+00
3.29E-04 1.14E-02 1.42E-03 2.50E-05 2.35E-04 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 5.49E-04 2.16E-04 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 3.46E-04 2.43E+00 2.40E+00
3.30E-04 8.29E-03 1.41E-03 2.50E-05 2.36E-04 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 5.50E-04 2.18E-04 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 3.47E-04 2.42E+00 2.40E+00
9.85E-05 1.53E-02 4.21E-04 2.53E-05 6.27E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.77E-04 5.77E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 1.87E-04 2.46E+00 2.43E+00
2.34E-04 1.19E-02 1.04E-03 2.50E-05 2.27E-04 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 5.41E-04 2.09E-04 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 3.39E-04 2.42E+00 2.40E+00
6.44E-04 4.53E-03 1.33E-02 1.52E-05 4.05E-06 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 1.03E-04 3.61E-06 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 4.27E-05 1.05E+00 1.04E+00
1.16E-03 3.06E-02 6.70E-03 3.71E-05 9.51E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 1.17E-03 8.75E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 9.54E-04 3.79E+00 3.75E+00
8.87E-04 1.81E-02 4.22E-03 3.67E-05 5.50E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 7.65E-04 5.06E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 5.84E-04 3.75E+00 3.71E+00
9.01E-04 1.85E-02 4.29E-03 3.67E-05 5.62E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 7.77E-04 5.17E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 5.95E-04 3.75E+00 3.72E+00
5.77E-04 1.01E-02 2.68E-03 3.65E-05 2.95E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 5.10E-04 2.71E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 3.49E-04 3.73E+00 3.69E+00
8.30E-04 1.81E-02 3.93E-03 3.68E-05 5.08E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 7.23E-04 4.67E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 5.45E-04 3.75E+00 3.72E+00
2.97E-04 3.02E-02 1.46E-03 3.73E-05 1.68E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.83E-04 1.54E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 2.33E-04 3.80E+00 3.77E+00
2.86E-04 3.22E-02 1.43E-03 3.72E-05 1.66E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.82E-04 1.53E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 2.31E-04 3.80E+00 3.77E+00
0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
1.61E-04 3.00E-02 8.91E-04 3.76E-05 1.28E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.43E-04 1.17E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 1.96E-04 3.84E+00 3.80E+00
7.59E-04 2.51E-02 4.22E-03 3.67E-05 5.55E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 7.71E-04 5.11E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 5.89E-04 3.75E+00 3.71E+00
7.68E-04 2.56E-02 4.28E-03 3.67E-05 5.65E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 7.80E-04 5.20E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 5.98E-04 3.75E+00 3.71E+00
1.88E-04 2.58E-02 9.76E-04 3.72E-05 1.13E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.28E-04 1.04E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 1.82E-04 3.80E+00 3.76E+00
1.08E-03 2.49E-02 5.75E-03 3.68E-05 7.39E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 9.54E-04 6.80E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 7.58E-04 3.75E+00 3.72E+00
1.14E-03 2.60E-02 6.14E-03 3.68E-05 7.75E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 9.90E-04 7.13E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 7.91E-04 3.75E+00 3.72E+00
4.30E-04 2.29E-02 2.28E-03 3.67E-05 3.74E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 5.89E-04 3.44E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 4.22E-04 3.74E+00 3.71E+00
2.16E-03 1.33E-02 6.34E-02 1.42E-05 2.67E-06 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 1.01E-04 2.24E-06 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 4.14E-05 1.05E+00 1.04E+00
1.59E-03 3.80E-02 9.59E-03 5.22E-05 5.68E-04 1.76E-05 1.68E-03 2.27E-03 5.23E-04 4.41E-06 7.20E-04 1.25E-03 5.38E+00 5.33E+00
lbs/Mile
Santa Clara 2013 - all Model Years (40 MPH)
Region_Ty
pe Region CalYr Season Veh
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual All Other Buses
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual LDA
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual LDT1
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual LDT2
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual LHD1
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual LHD2
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual MCY
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual MDV
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual MH
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual Motor Coach
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual OBUS
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual PTO
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual SBUS
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 Ag
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 CAIRP heavy
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 CAIRP small
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 instate construction heavy
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 instate construction small
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 instate heavy
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 instate small
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 OOS heavy
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 OOS small
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 Public
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6 utility
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T6TS
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 Ag
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 CAIRP
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 CAIRP construction
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 NNOOS
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 NOOS
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 other port
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 POAK
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 POLA
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 Public
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 Single
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 single construction
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 SWCV
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 tractor
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 tractor construction
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7 utility
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual T7IS
County Santa Clara 2013 Annual UBUS
##
ROG_RUNEX NOx_RUNEX CO_RUNEX SOx_RUNEX PM10_PMTW PM10_PMBW PM10_RUNEX PM10_Total
PM2_5_PMT
W
PM2_5_PMB
W
PM2_5_RUNE
X PM2_5_Total CO2_RUNEX
CO2(Pavley I +
LCFS)_RUNEX
2.64E-07 7.88E-06 1.07E-06 1.15E-08 2.09E-07 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 3.51E-07 1.92E-07 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 2.51E-07 1.11E-03 1.10E-03
4.07E-08 1.44E-07 1.49E-06 3.32E-09 2.01E-09 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.68E-08 1.83E-09 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.96E-08 2.94E-04 2.69E-04
1.12E-07 3.71E-07 3.63E-06 3.86E-09 4.58E-09 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.93E-08 4.16E-09 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 2.19E-08 3.39E-04 3.17E-04
4.60E-08 2.53E-07 1.97E-06 4.54E-09 1.86E-09 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.66E-08 1.70E-09 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.94E-08 4.01E-04 3.79E-04
1.07E-07 1.52E-06 1.39E-06 8.55E-09 1.07E-08 9.03E-09 4.69E-08 6.67E-08 9.89E-09 2.26E-09 2.01E-08 3.23E-08 4.88E-04 4.84E-04
1.25E-07 2.40E-06 1.22E-06 7.10E-09 2.09E-08 1.03E-08 6.63E-08 9.74E-08 1.92E-08 2.56E-09 2.84E-08 5.02E-08 5.04E-04 4.99E-04
2.16E-06 1.23E-06 2.06E-05 1.99E-09 7.53E-10 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.55E-08 5.98E-10 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.83E-08 1.28E-04 1.27E-04
6.66E-08 3.94E-07 2.72E-06 5.74E-09 2.10E-09 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.68E-08 1.93E-09 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.97E-08 5.08E-04 4.87E-04
2.11E-07 2.08E-06 6.44E-06 7.55E-09 2.37E-08 8.54E-09 4.94E-08 8.17E-08 2.17E-08 2.14E-09 2.12E-08 4.51E-08 5.61E-04 5.55E-04
2.94E-07 1.02E-05 1.47E-06 1.67E-08 2.17E-07 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 3.59E-07 2.00E-07 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 2.59E-07 1.71E-03 1.69E-03
1.26E-07 1.28E-06 2.51E-06 6.83E-09 6.07E-10 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.54E-08 5.55E-10 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.83E-08 4.75E-04 4.70E-04
7.21E-07 1.31E-05 3.37E-06 2.05E-08 4.05E-07 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 4.05E-07 3.72E-07 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 3.72E-07 2.15E-03 2.13E-03
3.98E-07 7.49E-06 6.02E-06 1.10E-08 1.14E-07 1.08E-08 5.34E-07 6.58E-07 1.04E-07 2.70E-09 2.29E-07 3.36E-07 9.20E-04 9.11E-04
3.89E-07 8.06E-06 1.55E-06 1.15E-08 3.13E-07 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 4.56E-07 2.88E-07 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 3.47E-07 1.11E-03 1.10E-03
1.49E-07 5.19E-06 6.45E-07 1.14E-08 1.07E-07 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 2.49E-07 9.80E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 1.57E-07 1.10E-03 1.09E-03
1.50E-07 3.76E-06 6.41E-07 1.13E-08 1.07E-07 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 2.50E-07 9.87E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 1.58E-07 1.10E-03 1.09E-03
2.48E-07 7.66E-06 1.08E-06 1.14E-08 1.87E-07 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 3.30E-07 1.72E-07 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 2.31E-07 1.10E-03 1.09E-03
2.02E-07 5.31E-06 8.79E-07 1.13E-08 1.56E-07 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 2.98E-07 1.43E-07 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 2.02E-07 1.10E-03 1.09E-03
2.40E-07 7.33E-06 1.05E-06 1.14E-08 1.80E-07 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 3.22E-07 1.66E-07 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 2.25E-07 1.10E-03 1.09E-03
1.92E-07 4.99E-06 8.38E-07 1.13E-08 1.47E-07 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 2.89E-07 1.35E-07 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 1.94E-07 1.10E-03 1.09E-03
1.49E-07 5.19E-06 6.45E-07 1.14E-08 1.07E-07 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 2.49E-07 9.80E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 1.57E-07 1.10E-03 1.09E-03
1.50E-07 3.76E-06 6.41E-07 1.13E-08 1.07E-07 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 2.50E-07 9.87E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 1.58E-07 1.10E-03 1.09E-03
4.47E-08 6.94E-06 1.91E-07 1.15E-08 2.85E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.71E-07 2.62E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 8.50E-08 1.12E-03 1.10E-03
1.06E-07 5.40E-06 4.72E-07 1.13E-08 1.03E-07 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 2.45E-07 9.48E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 1.54E-07 1.10E-03 1.09E-03
2.92E-07 2.06E-06 6.05E-06 6.91E-09 1.84E-09 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.66E-08 1.64E-09 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.94E-08 4.75E-04 4.70E-04
5.25E-07 1.39E-05 3.04E-06 1.68E-08 4.32E-07 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 5.29E-07 3.97E-07 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 4.33E-07 1.72E-03 1.70E-03
4.02E-07 8.22E-06 1.91E-06 1.67E-08 2.49E-07 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 3.47E-07 2.29E-07 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 2.65E-07 1.70E-03 1.68E-03
4.09E-07 8.40E-06 1.95E-06 1.67E-08 2.55E-07 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 3.53E-07 2.34E-07 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 2.70E-07 1.70E-03 1.69E-03
2.62E-07 4.58E-06 1.22E-06 1.65E-08 1.34E-07 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 2.31E-07 1.23E-07 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 1.58E-07 1.69E-03 1.67E-03
3.76E-07 8.22E-06 1.78E-06 1.67E-08 2.30E-07 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 3.28E-07 2.12E-07 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 2.47E-07 1.70E-03 1.69E-03
1.35E-07 1.37E-05 6.60E-07 1.69E-08 7.61E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.74E-07 7.00E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 1.06E-07 1.73E-03 1.71E-03
1.30E-07 1.46E-05 6.48E-07 1.69E-08 7.54E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.73E-07 6.94E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 1.05E-07 1.73E-03 1.71E-03
0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
7.30E-08 1.36E-05 4.04E-07 1.70E-08 5.79E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.56E-07 5.33E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 8.87E-08 1.74E-03 1.72E-03
3.44E-07 1.14E-05 1.91E-06 1.67E-08 2.52E-07 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 3.50E-07 2.32E-07 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 2.67E-07 1.70E-03 1.68E-03
3.48E-07 1.16E-05 1.94E-06 1.67E-08 2.56E-07 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 3.54E-07 2.36E-07 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 2.71E-07 1.70E-03 1.68E-03
8.53E-08 1.17E-05 4.43E-07 1.69E-08 5.10E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.49E-07 4.69E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 8.24E-08 1.72E-03 1.71E-03
4.90E-07 1.13E-05 2.61E-06 1.67E-08 3.35E-07 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 4.33E-07 3.08E-07 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 3.44E-07 1.70E-03 1.69E-03
5.17E-07 1.18E-05 2.78E-06 1.67E-08 3.51E-07 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 4.49E-07 3.23E-07 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 3.59E-07 1.70E-03 1.69E-03
1.95E-07 1.04E-05 1.04E-06 1.66E-08 1.70E-07 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 2.67E-07 1.56E-07 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 1.91E-07 1.70E-03 1.68E-03
9.80E-07 6.04E-06 2.87E-05 6.43E-09 1.21E-09 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.60E-08 1.01E-09 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.88E-08 4.75E-04 4.70E-04
7.19E-07 1.72E-05 4.35E-06 2.37E-08 2.58E-07 8.00E-09 7.62E-07 1.03E-06 2.37E-07 2.00E-09 3.27E-07 5.66E-07 2.44E-03 2.42E-03
MTons/Mile
Year 2020 MTons/Year
Based on EMFAC2011
Emission year Annual VMT GWP GWP
2020 310 1 MTons MTons
Percent of
VMT Adjust % VMT NOx N2O CO2 CO2e CO2w/Pavley +
LCF
CO2e w/ Pavley +
LCFS
All Other Buses 0.06%0.06%5.34E-01 0 2.08E+02 214 1.87E+02 193
LDA 55.18%55.18%1.31E+01 0 5.60E+04 56,152 3.86E+04 38,761
LDT1 5.87%5.87%3.85E+00 0 6.89E+03 6,930 5.06E+03 5,095
LDT2 18.52%18.52%7.19E+00 0 2.56E+04 25,665 1.94E+04 19,473
LHD1 2.94%2.94%9.33E+00 0 4.93E+03 5,024 4.44E+03 4,531
LHD2 0.44%0.44%2.14E+00 0 7.65E+02 786 6.89E+02 710
MCY 0.62%0.62%2.46E+00 0 2.91E+02 315 2.62E+02 286
MDV 12.27%12.27%9.77E+00 0 2.16E+04 21,706 1.71E+04 17,161
MH 0.18%0.18%7.65E-01 0 3.40E+02 347 3.06E+02 313
Motor Coach 0.06%0.06%6.51E-01 0 3.29E+02 335 2.96E+02 302
OBUS 0.07%0.07%1.48E-01 0 1.07E+02 109 9.65E+01 98
PTO 0.05%0.05%1.11E+00 0 3.95E+02 406 3.56E+02 367
SBUS 0.05%0.05%1.05E+00 0 1.57E+02 168 1.42E+02 152
T6 Ag 0.01%0.01%8.57E-02 0 3.09E+01 32 2.78E+01 29
T6 CAIRP heavy 0.00%0.00%3.89E-03 0 2.33E+00 2 2.09E+00 2
T6 CAIRP small 0.00%0.00%7.41E-03 0 7.93E+00 8 7.14E+00 7
T6 instate construction heavy 0.03%0.03%3.11E-01 0 1.07E+02 111 9.67E+01 100
T6 instate construction small 0.08%0.08%3.66E-01 0 2.87E+02 291 2.59E+02 262
T6 instate heavy 0.24%0.24%2.40E+00 0 9.16E+02 939 8.24E+02 848
T6 instate small 0.69%0.69%3.08E+00 0 2.57E+03 2,596 2.31E+03 2,339
T6 OOS heavy 0.00%0.00%2.23E-03 0 1.33E+00 1 1.20E+00 1
T6 OOS small 0.00%0.00%4.25E-03 0 4.55E+00 5 4.09E+00 4
T6 Public 0.03%0.03%3.34E-01 0 1.12E+02 115 1.01E+02 104
T6 utility 0.00%0.00%2.76E-02 0 1.82E+01 18 1.63E+01 17
T6TS 0.18%0.18%4.43E-01 0 2.93E+02 298 2.64E+02 268
T7 Ag 0.02%0.02%4.52E-01 0 1.39E+02 144 1.25E+02 130
T7 CAIRP 0.37%0.37%3.11E+00 0 2.13E+03 2,163 1.92E+03 1,950
T7 CAIRP construction 0.02%0.02%1.99E-01 0 1.34E+02 136 1.21E+02 123
T7 NNOOS 0.42%0.42%2.36E+00 0 2.40E+03 2,418 2.16E+03 2,179
T7 NOOS 0.13%0.13%1.13E+00 0 7.77E+02 788 6.99E+02 710
T7 other port 0.04%0.04%9.17E-01 0 2.13E+02 222 1.92E+02 201
T7 POAK 0.19%0.19%5.02E+00 0 1.16E+03 1,210 1.04E+03 1,094
T7 POLA 0.00%0.00%0.00E+00 0 0.00E+00 0 0.00E+00 0
T7 Public 0.02%0.02%5.93E-01 0 1.22E+02 128 1.10E+02 116
T7 Single 0.22%0.22%3.35E+00 0 1.30E+03 1,337 1.17E+03 1,207
T7 single construction 0.06%0.06%9.32E-01 0 3.50E+02 359 3.15E+02 324
T7 SWCV 0.06%0.06%1.18E+00 0 3.28E+02 340 2.95E+02 307
T7 tractor 0.67%0.67%9.39E+00 0 3.92E+03 4,009 3.52E+03 3,617
T7 tractor construction 0.04%0.04%6.84E-01 0 2.60E+02 267 2.34E+02 241
T7 utility 0.00%0.00%4.43E-02 0 1.93E+01 20 1.74E+01 18
T7IS 0.03%0.03%5.10E-01 0 5.32E+01 58 4.79E+01 53
UBUS 0.13%0.13%6.73E+00 0 1.05E+03 1,112 9.41E+02 1,008
TOTAL 100%100%96 3 136,341 137,284 103,755 104,699
344,407,910
N2O emissions were calculated using an off-model adjustment provided by CARB in AB 32 Technical Appendices. The off-model adjustment uses a linear regression correlating N2O with NOx. (N2O = 0.0167 + 0.0318 x NOx)
Daily vehicles miles traveled (VMT) multiplied by 347 days/year to account for reduced traffic on weekends and holidays. This assumption is consistent with the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) methodology within the Climate
Change Scoping Plan Measure Documentation Supplement.
Based on the emission factors for Santa Clara County - San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin
Santa Clara 2020 - all Model Years (40 MPH)
Region_Ty
pe Region CalYr Season Veh ROG_RUNEX NOx_RUNEX CO_RUNEX SOx_RUNEX PM10_RUN EX PM10_PMTW PM10_PMBW PM10_Total
PM2.5_RUN
EX PM2.5_PMTW PM2.5_PMBW PM2_5_Total CO2_RUNEX
CO2(Pavley I +
LCFS)_RUNEX
VMT from
EMFAC-SG %VMT
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual All Other Buses 8.81E-02 2.80E+00 3.66E-01 1.13E-02 3.98E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.82E-01 3.66E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 9.55E-02 1.09E+03 9.83E+02 25,956 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual LDA 1.12E-02 6.89E-02 7.07E-01 3.32E-03 1.45E-03 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.62E-02 1.34E-03 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.91E-02 2.95E+02 2.03E+02 25,865,514 55%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual LDT1 3.55E-02 1.90E-01 1.84E+00 3.85E-03 2.80E-03 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.75E-02 2.59E-03 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 2.03E-02 3.41E+02 2.50E+02 2,753,499 6%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual LDT2 1.50E-02 1.13E-01 9.85E-01 4.52E-03 1.41E-03 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.62E-02 1.31E-03 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.91E-02 4.01E+02 3.04E+02 8,680,665 19%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual LHD1 6.28E-02 9.22E-01 7.57E-01 8.52E-03 7.43E-03 9.02E-03 4.69E-02 6.34E-02 6.84E-03 2.26E-03 2.01E-02 2.92E-02 4.87E+02 4.39E+02 1,377,614 3%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual LHD2 7.08E-02 1.40E+00 5.23E-01 7.10E-03 1.44E-02 1.02E-02 6.58E-02 9.04E-02 1.32E-02 2.55E-03 2.82E-02 4.40E-02 5.01E+02 4.51E+02 207,756 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual MCY 1.95E+00 1.16E+00 1.66E+01 2.02E-03 2.63E-04 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.50E-02 2.21E-04 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.80E-02 1.37E+02 1.24E+02 288,687 1%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual MDV 3.73E-02 2.31E-01 1.76E+00 5.77E-03 1.73E-03 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.65E-02 1.60E-03 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.94E-02 5.11E+02 4.04E+02 5,753,330 12%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual MH 5.98E-02 1.26E+00 1.46E+00 7.41E-03 1.62E-02 8.52E-03 4.89E-02 7.37E-02 1.49E-02 2.13E-03 2.10E-02 3.80E-02 5.58E+02 5.02E+02 82,840 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual Motor Coach 1.78E-01 3.34E+00 8.25E-01 1.65E-02 5.90E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 2.01E-01 5.43E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 1.13E-01 1.68E+03 1.52E+03 26,568 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual OBUS 5.93E-02 6.54E-01 1.17E+00 6.79E-03 2.98E-04 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.50E-02 2.76E-04 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.80E-02 4.75E+02 4.28E+02 30,722 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual PTO 2.45E-01 6.00E+00 7.73E-01 2.04E-02 5.04E-02 5.04E-02 4.64E-02 4.64E-02 2.14E+03 1.93E+03 25,138 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual SBUS 1.92E-01 6.07E+00 2.69E+00 1.08E-02 2.90E-02 1.07E-02 5.21E-01 5.60E-01 2.67E-02 2.68E-03 2.23E-01 2.53E-01 9.11E+02 8.20E+02 23,513 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 Ag 1.60E-01 3.03E+00 6.61E-01 1.13E-02 9.50E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 2.37E-01 8.74E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 1.46E-01 1.09E+03 9.84E+02 3,852 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 CAIRP heavy 7.72E-02 1.82E+00 3.19E-01 1.12E-02 3.25E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.75E-01 2.99E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 8.88E-02 1.09E+03 9.80E+02 291 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 CAIRP small 8.02E-02 1.01E+00 3.31E-01 1.12E-02 3.44E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.77E-01 3.16E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 9.05E-02 1.08E+03 9.76E+02 995 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 instate construction heavy 8.19E-02 3.17E+00 3.41E-01 1.13E-02 3.83E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.81E-01 3.52E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 9.41E-02 1.10E+03 9.86E+02 13,355 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 instate construction small 9.45E-02 1.38E+00 3.90E-01 1.12E-02 4.63E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.89E-01 4.26E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 1.01E-01 1.09E+03 9.78E+02 36,005 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 instate heavy 8.17E-02 2.86E+00 3.40E-01 1.13E-02 3.74E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.80E-01 3.44E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 9.33E-02 1.09E+03 9.85E+02 113,911 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 instate small 9.16E-02 1.30E+00 3.77E-01 1.12E-02 4.37E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.86E-01 4.02E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 9.91E-02 1.09E+03 9.77E+02 321,536 1%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 OOS heavy 7.72E-02 1.82E+00 3.19E-01 1.12E-02 3.25E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.75E-01 2.99E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 8.88E-02 1.09E+03 9.80E+02 167 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 OOS small 8.02E-02 1.01E+00 3.31E-01 1.12E-02 3.44E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.77E-01 3.16E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 9.05E-02 1.08E+03 9.76E+02 571 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 Public 5.64E-02 3.27E+00 2.35E-01 1.13E-02 2.65E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.69E-01 2.44E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 8.32E-02 1.10E+03 9.89E+02 13,876 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 utility 5.99E-02 1.66E+00 2.47E-01 1.12E-02 2.40E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.66E-01 2.21E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 8.09E-02 1.09E+03 9.82E+02 2,265 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6TS 8.33E-02 7.19E-01 1.62E+00 6.80E-03 5.24E-04 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.53E-02 4.84E-04 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.82E-02 4.75E+02 4.28E+02 83,955 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 Ag 2.65E-01 5.50E+00 1.33E+00 1.66E-02 1.32E-01 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 2.29E-01 1.21E-01 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 1.57E-01 1.69E+03 1.52E+03 11,193 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 CAIRP 1.96E-01 2.44E+00 9.12E-01 1.64E-02 6.34E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.61E-01 5.83E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 9.38E-02 1.68E+03 1.51E+03 173,047 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 CAIRP construction 1.96E-01 2.49E+00 9.12E-01 1.64E-02 6.34E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.61E-01 5.83E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 9.38E-02 1.68E+03 1.51E+03 10,891 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 NNOOS 1.67E-01 1.65E+00 7.76E-01 1.64E-02 5.13E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.49E-01 4.72E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 8.27E-02 1.67E+03 1.51E+03 194,671 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 NOOS 1.96E-01 2.45E+00 9.12E-01 1.64E-02 6.33E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.61E-01 5.83E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 9.37E-02 1.68E+03 1.51E+03 63,019 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 other port 4.42E-01 7.44E+00 2.04E+00 1.69E-02 9.81E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.96E-01 9.03E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 1.26E-01 1.73E+03 1.55E+03 16,791 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 POAK 4.44E-01 7.47E+00 2.05E+00 1.69E-02 9.81E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.96E-01 9.03E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 1.26E-01 1.73E+03 1.56E+03 91,393 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 POLA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 Public 9.72E-02 8.35E+00 4.85E-01 1.68E-02 5.07E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.48E-01 4.67E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 8.21E-02 1.72E+03 1.55E+03 9,669 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 Single 1.41E-01 4.35E+00 6.57E-01 1.66E-02 4.89E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.47E-01 4.50E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 8.04E-02 1.69E+03 1.52E+03 104,951 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 single construction 1.41E-01 4.50E+00 6.56E-01 1.66E-02 4.92E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.47E-01 4.53E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 8.07E-02 1.69E+03 1.52E+03 28,172 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 SWCV 1.16E-01 6.08E+00 5.56E-01 1.66E-02 4.29E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.41E-01 3.95E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 7.49E-02 1.70E+03 1.53E+03 26,316 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 tractor 1.94E-01 4.04E+00 9.01E-01 1.65E-02 6.58E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.64E-01 6.05E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 9.60E-02 1.69E+03 1.52E+03 316,139 1%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 tractor construction 1.92E-01 4.43E+00 8.95E-01 1.65E-02 6.63E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.64E-01 6.10E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 9.65E-02 1.69E+03 1.52E+03 21,005 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 utility 1.07E-01 3.89E+00 4.98E-01 1.66E-02 3.65E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.34E-01 3.36E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 6.90E-02 1.69E+03 1.52E+03 1,551 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7IS 4.62E-01 4.55E+00 2.16E+01 6.27E-03 2.78E-04 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.50E-02 2.55E-04 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.80E-02 4.75E+02 4.28E+02 15,245 0%
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual UBUS 6.29E-01 1.54E+01 3.05E+00 2.32E-02 2.31E-01 8.00E-03 7.62E-01 1.00E+00 2.13E-01 2.00E-03 3.27E-01 5.41E-01 2.39E+03 2.15E+03 59,460 0%
46,876,092 100%
g/mile
Santa Clara 2020 - all Model Years (40 MPH)
Region_Ty
pe Region CalYr Season Veh
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual All Other Buses
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual LDA
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual LDT1
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual LDT2
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual LHD1
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual LHD2
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual MCY
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual MDV
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual MH
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual Motor Coach
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual OBUS
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual PTO
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual SBUS
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 Ag
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 CAIRP heavy
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 CAIRP small
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 instate construction heavy
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 instate construction small
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 instate heavy
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 instate small
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 OOS heavy
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 OOS small
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 Public
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 utility
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6TS
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 Ag
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 CAIRP
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 CAIRP construction
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 NNOOS
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 NOOS
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 other port
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 POAK
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 POLA
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 Public
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 Single
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 single construction
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 SWCV
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 tractor
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 tractor construction
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 utility
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7IS
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual UBUS
##
ROG_RUNEX NOx_RUNEX CO_RUNEX SOx_RUNEX PM10_PMTW PM10_PMBW PM10_RUNEX PM10_Total
PM2_5_PMT
W
PM2_5_PMB
W
PM2_5_RUNE
X PM2_5_Total CO2_RUNEX
CO2(Pavley I +
LCFS)_RUNEX
1.94E-04 6.18E-03 8.08E-04 2.48E-05 8.78E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 4.02E-04 8.08E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 2.11E-04 2.41E+00 2.17E+00
2.46E-05 1.52E-04 1.56E-03 7.32E-06 3.20E-06 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 1.02E-04 2.96E-06 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 4.21E-05 6.50E-01 4.48E-01
7.82E-05 4.19E-04 4.06E-03 8.49E-06 6.16E-06 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 1.05E-04 5.71E-06 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 4.48E-05 7.51E-01 5.51E-01
3.31E-05 2.49E-04 2.17E-03 9.96E-06 3.12E-06 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 1.02E-04 2.89E-06 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 4.20E-05 8.85E-01 6.71E-01
1.38E-04 2.03E-03 1.67E-03 1.88E-05 1.64E-05 1.99E-05 1.03E-04 1.40E-04 1.51E-05 4.97E-06 4.43E-05 6.44E-05 1.07E+00 9.67E-01
1.56E-04 3.09E-03 1.15E-03 1.57E-05 3.17E-05 2.25E-05 1.45E-04 1.99E-04 2.91E-05 5.63E-06 6.22E-05 9.69E-05 1.11E+00 9.95E-01
4.29E-03 2.55E-03 3.67E-02 4.45E-06 5.81E-07 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 9.92E-05 4.86E-07 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 3.96E-05 3.03E-01 2.72E-01
8.22E-05 5.10E-04 3.88E-03 1.27E-05 3.82E-06 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 1.02E-04 3.54E-06 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 4.27E-05 1.13E+00 8.90E-01
1.32E-04 2.77E-03 3.22E-03 1.63E-05 3.58E-05 1.88E-05 1.08E-04 1.62E-04 3.29E-05 4.70E-06 4.62E-05 8.38E-05 1.23E+00 1.11E+00
3.92E-04 7.36E-03 1.82E-03 3.64E-05 1.30E-04 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 4.44E-04 1.20E-04 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 2.49E-04 3.71E+00 3.34E+00
1.31E-04 1.44E-03 2.57E-03 1.50E-05 6.57E-07 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 9.93E-05 6.09E-07 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 3.97E-05 1.05E+00 9.43E-01
5.41E-04 1.32E-02 1.70E-03 4.50E-05 1.11E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.11E-04 1.02E-04 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 1.02E-04 4.72E+00 4.25E+00
4.23E-04 1.34E-02 5.92E-03 2.39E-05 6.40E-05 2.37E-05 1.15E-03 1.24E-03 5.89E-05 5.92E-06 4.92E-04 5.57E-04 2.01E+00 1.81E+00
3.53E-04 6.68E-03 1.46E-03 2.48E-05 2.10E-04 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 5.23E-04 1.93E-04 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 3.23E-04 2.41E+00 2.17E+00
1.70E-04 4.02E-03 7.04E-04 2.47E-05 7.16E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.85E-04 6.59E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 1.96E-04 2.40E+00 2.16E+00
1.77E-04 2.23E-03 7.29E-04 2.46E-05 7.58E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.90E-04 6.98E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 2.00E-04 2.39E+00 2.15E+00
1.81E-04 6.99E-03 7.52E-04 2.49E-05 8.43E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.98E-04 7.76E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 2.07E-04 2.41E+00 2.17E+00
2.08E-04 3.05E-03 8.59E-04 2.47E-05 1.02E-04 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 4.16E-04 9.40E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 2.24E-04 2.40E+00 2.16E+00
1.80E-04 6.31E-03 7.49E-04 2.49E-05 8.24E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.96E-04 7.58E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 2.06E-04 2.41E+00 2.17E+00
2.02E-04 2.87E-03 8.32E-04 2.47E-05 9.64E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 4.10E-04 8.87E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 2.18E-04 2.39E+00 2.15E+00
1.70E-04 4.02E-03 7.04E-04 2.47E-05 7.16E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.85E-04 6.59E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 1.96E-04 2.40E+00 2.16E+00
1.77E-04 2.23E-03 7.29E-04 2.46E-05 7.58E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.90E-04 6.98E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 2.00E-04 2.39E+00 2.15E+00
1.24E-04 7.22E-03 5.18E-04 2.50E-05 5.84E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.72E-04 5.38E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 1.84E-04 2.42E+00 2.18E+00
1.32E-04 3.65E-03 5.45E-04 2.48E-05 5.29E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.67E-04 4.87E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 1.78E-04 2.41E+00 2.17E+00
1.84E-04 1.58E-03 3.57E-03 1.50E-05 1.15E-06 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 9.98E-05 1.07E-06 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 4.02E-05 1.05E+00 9.43E-01
5.84E-04 1.21E-02 2.94E-03 3.65E-05 2.90E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 5.06E-04 2.67E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 3.45E-04 3.73E+00 3.36E+00
4.33E-04 5.39E-03 2.01E-03 3.62E-05 1.40E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.55E-04 1.29E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 2.07E-04 3.70E+00 3.33E+00
4.33E-04 5.48E-03 2.01E-03 3.62E-05 1.40E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.55E-04 1.29E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 2.07E-04 3.70E+00 3.33E+00
3.69E-04 3.64E-03 1.71E-03 3.61E-05 1.13E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.29E-04 1.04E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 1.82E-04 3.69E+00 3.32E+00
4.33E-04 5.40E-03 2.01E-03 3.62E-05 1.40E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.55E-04 1.28E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 2.07E-04 3.70E+00 3.33E+00
9.75E-04 1.64E-02 4.51E-03 3.73E-05 2.16E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 4.32E-04 1.99E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 2.77E-04 3.81E+00 3.43E+00
9.78E-04 1.65E-02 4.52E-03 3.73E-05 2.16E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 4.32E-04 1.99E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 2.77E-04 3.81E+00 3.43E+00
0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
2.14E-04 1.84E-02 1.07E-03 3.71E-05 1.12E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.27E-04 1.03E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 1.81E-04 3.79E+00 3.41E+00
3.11E-04 9.59E-03 1.45E-03 3.65E-05 1.08E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.23E-04 9.92E-05 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 1.77E-04 3.73E+00 3.36E+00
3.10E-04 9.93E-03 1.45E-03 3.65E-05 1.09E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.24E-04 9.98E-05 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 1.78E-04 3.73E+00 3.36E+00
2.56E-04 1.34E-02 1.23E-03 3.66E-05 9.45E-05 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.10E-04 8.70E-05 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 1.65E-04 3.74E+00 3.37E+00
4.27E-04 8.91E-03 1.99E-03 3.64E-05 1.45E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.61E-04 1.33E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 2.12E-04 3.72E+00 3.35E+00
4.24E-04 9.77E-03 1.97E-03 3.64E-05 1.46E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.62E-04 1.35E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 2.13E-04 3.72E+00 3.35E+00
2.36E-04 8.57E-03 1.10E-03 3.65E-05 8.05E-05 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 2.96E-04 7.40E-05 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 1.52E-04 3.73E+00 3.36E+00
1.02E-03 1.00E-02 4.76E-02 1.38E-05 6.13E-07 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 9.93E-05 5.63E-07 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 3.97E-05 1.05E+00 9.43E-01
1.39E-03 3.40E-02 6.72E-03 5.11E-05 5.10E-04 1.76E-05 1.68E-03 2.21E-03 4.69E-04 4.41E-06 7.20E-04 1.19E-03 5.28E+00 4.75E+00
lbs/Mile
Santa Clara 2020 - all Model Years (40 MPH)
Region_Ty
pe Region CalYr Season Veh
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual All Other Buses
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual LDA
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual LDT1
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual LDT2
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual LHD1
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual LHD2
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual MCY
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual MDV
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual MH
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual Motor Coach
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual OBUS
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual PTO
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual SBUS
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 Ag
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 CAIRP heavy
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 CAIRP small
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 instate construction heavy
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 instate construction small
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 instate heavy
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 instate small
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 OOS heavy
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 OOS small
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 Public
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6 utility
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T6TS
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 Ag
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 CAIRP
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 CAIRP construction
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 NNOOS
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 NOOS
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 other port
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 POAK
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 POLA
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 Public
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 Single
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 single construction
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 SWCV
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 tractor
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 tractor construction
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7 utility
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual T7IS
County Santa Clara 2020 Annual UBUS
##
ROG_RUNEX NOx_RUNEX CO_RUNEX SOx_RUNEX PM10_PMTW PM10_PMBW PM10_RUNEX PM10_Total
PM2_5_PMT
W
PM2_5_PMB
W
PM2_5_RUNE
X PM2_5_Total CO2_RUNEX
CO2(Pavley I +
LCFS)_RUNEX
8.81E-08 2.80E-06 3.66E-07 1.13E-08 3.98E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.82E-07 3.66E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 9.55E-08 1.09E-03 9.83E-04
1.12E-08 6.89E-08 7.07E-07 3.32E-09 1.45E-09 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.62E-08 1.34E-09 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.91E-08 2.95E-04 2.03E-04
3.55E-08 1.90E-07 1.84E-06 3.85E-09 2.80E-09 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.75E-08 2.59E-09 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 2.03E-08 3.41E-04 2.50E-04
1.50E-08 1.13E-07 9.85E-07 4.52E-09 1.41E-09 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.62E-08 1.31E-09 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.91E-08 4.01E-04 3.04E-04
6.28E-08 9.22E-07 7.57E-07 8.52E-09 7.43E-09 9.02E-09 4.69E-08 6.34E-08 6.84E-09 2.26E-09 2.01E-08 2.92E-08 4.87E-04 4.39E-04
7.08E-08 1.40E-06 5.23E-07 7.10E-09 1.44E-08 1.02E-08 6.58E-08 9.04E-08 1.32E-08 2.55E-09 2.82E-08 4.40E-08 5.01E-04 4.51E-04
1.95E-06 1.16E-06 1.66E-05 2.02E-09 2.63E-10 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.50E-08 2.21E-10 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.80E-08 1.37E-04 1.24E-04
3.73E-08 2.31E-07 1.76E-06 5.77E-09 1.73E-09 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.65E-08 1.60E-09 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.94E-08 5.11E-04 4.04E-04
5.98E-08 1.26E-06 1.46E-06 7.41E-09 1.62E-08 8.52E-09 4.89E-08 7.37E-08 1.49E-08 2.13E-09 2.10E-08 3.80E-08 5.58E-04 5.02E-04
1.78E-07 3.34E-06 8.25E-07 1.65E-08 5.90E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 2.01E-07 5.43E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 1.13E-07 1.68E-03 1.52E-03
5.93E-08 6.54E-07 1.17E-06 6.79E-09 2.98E-10 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.50E-08 2.76E-10 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.80E-08 4.75E-04 4.28E-04
2.45E-07 6.00E-06 7.73E-07 2.04E-08 5.04E-08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 5.04E-08 4.64E-08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 4.64E-08 2.14E-03 1.93E-03
1.92E-07 6.07E-06 2.69E-06 1.08E-08 2.90E-08 1.07E-08 5.21E-07 5.60E-07 2.67E-08 2.68E-09 2.23E-07 2.53E-07 9.11E-04 8.20E-04
1.60E-07 3.03E-06 6.61E-07 1.13E-08 9.50E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 2.37E-07 8.74E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 1.46E-07 1.09E-03 9.84E-04
7.72E-08 1.82E-06 3.19E-07 1.12E-08 3.25E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.75E-07 2.99E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 8.88E-08 1.09E-03 9.80E-04
8.02E-08 1.01E-06 3.31E-07 1.12E-08 3.44E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.77E-07 3.16E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 9.05E-08 1.08E-03 9.76E-04
8.19E-08 3.17E-06 3.41E-07 1.13E-08 3.83E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.81E-07 3.52E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 9.41E-08 1.10E-03 9.86E-04
9.45E-08 1.38E-06 3.90E-07 1.12E-08 4.63E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.89E-07 4.26E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 1.01E-07 1.09E-03 9.78E-04
8.17E-08 2.86E-06 3.40E-07 1.13E-08 3.74E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.80E-07 3.44E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 9.33E-08 1.09E-03 9.85E-04
9.16E-08 1.30E-06 3.77E-07 1.12E-08 4.37E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.86E-07 4.02E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 9.91E-08 1.09E-03 9.77E-04
7.72E-08 1.82E-06 3.19E-07 1.12E-08 3.25E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.75E-07 2.99E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 8.88E-08 1.09E-03 9.80E-04
8.02E-08 1.01E-06 3.31E-07 1.12E-08 3.44E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.77E-07 3.16E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 9.05E-08 1.08E-03 9.76E-04
5.64E-08 3.27E-06 2.35E-07 1.13E-08 2.65E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.69E-07 2.44E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 8.32E-08 1.10E-03 9.89E-04
5.99E-08 1.66E-06 2.47E-07 1.12E-08 2.40E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.66E-07 2.21E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 8.09E-08 1.09E-03 9.82E-04
8.33E-08 7.19E-07 1.62E-06 6.80E-09 5.24E-10 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.53E-08 4.84E-10 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.82E-08 4.75E-04 4.28E-04
2.65E-07 5.50E-06 1.33E-06 1.66E-08 1.32E-07 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 2.29E-07 1.21E-07 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 1.57E-07 1.69E-03 1.52E-03
1.96E-07 2.44E-06 9.12E-07 1.64E-08 6.34E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.61E-07 5.83E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 9.38E-08 1.68E-03 1.51E-03
1.96E-07 2.49E-06 9.12E-07 1.64E-08 6.34E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.61E-07 5.83E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 9.38E-08 1.68E-03 1.51E-03
1.67E-07 1.65E-06 7.76E-07 1.64E-08 5.13E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.49E-07 4.72E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 8.27E-08 1.67E-03 1.51E-03
1.96E-07 2.45E-06 9.12E-07 1.64E-08 6.33E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.61E-07 5.83E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 9.37E-08 1.68E-03 1.51E-03
4.42E-07 7.44E-06 2.04E-06 1.69E-08 9.81E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.96E-07 9.03E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 1.26E-07 1.73E-03 1.55E-03
4.44E-07 7.47E-06 2.05E-06 1.69E-08 9.81E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.96E-07 9.03E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 1.26E-07 1.73E-03 1.56E-03
0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
9.72E-08 8.35E-06 4.85E-07 1.68E-08 5.07E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.48E-07 4.67E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 8.21E-08 1.72E-03 1.55E-03
1.41E-07 4.35E-06 6.57E-07 1.66E-08 4.89E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.47E-07 4.50E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 8.04E-08 1.69E-03 1.52E-03
1.41E-07 4.50E-06 6.56E-07 1.66E-08 4.92E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.47E-07 4.53E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 8.07E-08 1.69E-03 1.52E-03
1.16E-07 6.08E-06 5.56E-07 1.66E-08 4.29E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.41E-07 3.95E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 7.49E-08 1.70E-03 1.53E-03
1.94E-07 4.04E-06 9.01E-07 1.65E-08 6.58E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.64E-07 6.05E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 9.60E-08 1.69E-03 1.52E-03
1.92E-07 4.43E-06 8.95E-07 1.65E-08 6.63E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.64E-07 6.10E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 9.65E-08 1.69E-03 1.52E-03
1.07E-07 3.89E-06 4.98E-07 1.66E-08 3.65E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.34E-07 3.36E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 6.90E-08 1.69E-03 1.52E-03
4.62E-07 4.55E-06 2.16E-05 6.27E-09 2.78E-10 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.50E-08 2.55E-10 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.80E-08 4.75E-04 4.28E-04
6.29E-07 1.54E-05 3.05E-06 2.32E-08 2.31E-07 8.00E-09 7.62E-07 1.00E-06 2.13E-07 2.00E-09 3.27E-07 5.41E-07 2.39E-03 2.15E-03
MTons/Mile
Year 2040
Based on EMFAC2011-PL
Emission year Daily
2013 1,264,270
Percent of
VMT Adjust % VMT ROG NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.5
All Other Buses 0.06%0.06%1.60E-01 2.03E+00 6.57E-01 1.96E-02 3.16E-01 1.64E-01
LDA 55.06%55.06%1.06E+01 7.75E+01 8.02E+02 5.09E+00 7.12E+01 2.96E+01
LDT1 5.88%5.88%1.54E+00 1.02E+01 1.10E+02 6.32E-01 7.61E+00 3.17E+00
LDT2 18.32%18.32%4.55E+00 3.31E+01 3.26E+02 2.30E+00 2.37E+01 9.85E+00
LHD1 2.95%2.95%1.62E+00 2.74E+01 1.81E+01 6.97E-01 4.94E+00 2.15E+00
LHD2 0.45%0.45%3.99E-01 6.08E+00 3.53E+00 8.79E-02 1.05E+00 4.75E-01
MCY 0.63%0.63%3.31E+01 2.00E+01 2.74E+02 3.54E-02 7.86E-01 3.13E-01
MDV 11.94%11.94%4.51E+00 3.14E+01 3.02E+02 1.92E+00 1.54E+01 6.41E+00
MH 0.17%0.17%8.92E-02 2.94E+00 8.36E-01 3.51E-02 3.03E-01 1.37E-01
Motor Coach 0.06%0.06%3.13E-01 3.10E+00 1.45E+00 2.94E-02 3.55E-01 1.97E-01
OBUS 0.06%0.06%1.82E-02 3.05E-01 3.75E-01 1.19E-02 7.88E-02 3.14E-02
PTO 0.06%0.06%4.54E-01 3.56E+00 1.40E+00 3.46E-02 7.59E-02 6.98E-02
SBUS 0.04%0.04%1.57E-01 2.96E+00 1.19E+00 1.19E-02 5.98E-01 2.72E-01
T6 Ag 0.01%0.01%1.70E-02 2.11E-01 7.00E-02 2.14E-03 3.43E-02 1.77E-02
T6 CAIRP heavy 0.00%0.00%1.45E-03 1.69E-02 5.96E-03 2.08E-04 3.23E-03 1.63E-03
T6 CAIRP small 0.00%0.00%4.76E-03 5.36E-02 1.96E-02 7.22E-04 1.11E-02 5.52E-03
T6 instate construction heavy 0.04%0.04%9.89E-02 1.21E+00 4.08E-01 1.31E-02 2.07E-01 1.06E-01
T6 instate construction small 0.12%0.12%2.67E-01 3.10E+00 1.10E+00 3.86E-02 5.98E-01 3.01E-01
T6 instate heavy 0.25%0.25%5.89E-01 7.21E+00 2.43E+00 7.79E-02 1.24E+00 6.33E-01
T6 instate small 0.74%0.74%1.58E+00 1.84E+01 6.53E+00 2.29E-01 3.55E+00 1.79E+00
T6 OOS heavy 0.00%0.00%8.29E-04 9.66E-03 3.42E-03 1.20E-04 1.85E-03 9.34E-04
T6 OOS small 0.00%0.00%2.73E-03 3.08E-02 1.12E-02 4.14E-04 6.34E-03 3.16E-03
T6 Public 0.03%0.03%6.27E-02 7.35E-01 2.58E-01 1.09E-02 1.62E-01 7.88E-02
T6 utility 0.01%0.01%9.60E-03 9.45E-02 3.96E-02 1.73E-03 2.56E-02 1.23E-02
T6TS 0.17%0.17%5.35E-02 8.67E-01 1.10E+00 3.30E-02 2.19E-01 8.72E-02
T7 Ag 0.02%0.02%1.03E-01 1.04E+00 4.77E-01 9.12E-03 8.72E-02 4.99E-02
T7 CAIRP 0.42%0.42%2.24E+00 2.32E+01 1.04E+01 1.93E-01 1.88E+00 1.09E+00
T7 CAIRP construction 0.04%0.04%1.94E-01 2.01E+00 9.03E-01 1.68E-02 1.63E-01 9.43E-02
T7 NNOOS 0.47%0.47%2.19E+00 2.09E+01 1.01E+01 2.17E-01 1.97E+00 1.09E+00
T7 NOOS 0.15%0.15%8.15E-01 8.44E+00 3.79E+00 7.02E-02 6.83E-01 3.95E-01
T7 other port 0.04%0.04%2.54E-01 2.86E+00 1.18E+00 1.82E-02 1.95E-01 1.19E-01
T7 POAK 0.36%0.36%2.27E+00 2.55E+01 1.05E+01 1.62E-01 1.74E+00 1.06E+00
T7 POLA 0.00%0.00%0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
T7 Public 0.02%0.02%8.42E-02 1.66E+00 3.93E-01 1.12E-02 9.17E-02 4.74E-02
T7 Single 0.26%0.26%1.10E+00 1.01E+01 5.12E+00 1.17E-01 1.03E+00 5.60E-01
T7 single construction 0.09%0.09%4.10E-01 3.75E+00 1.90E+00 4.33E-02 3.82E-01 2.08E-01
T7 SWCV 0.07%0.07%2.59E-01 2.38E+00 1.20E+00 3.03E-02 2.55E-01 1.34E-01
T7 tractor 0.77%0.77%4.11E+00 4.26E+01 1.91E+01 3.52E-01 3.43E+00 1.99E+00
T7 tractor construction 0.07%0.07%3.78E-01 3.92E+00 1.75E+00 3.23E-02 3.15E-01 1.83E-01
T7 utility 0.00%0.00%1.33E-02 1.02E-01 6.15E-02 1.74E-03 1.40E-02 7.12E-03
T7IS 0.02%0.02%1.96E-01 2.75E+00 1.35E+01 3.99E-03 2.86E-02 1.14E-02
UBUS 0.12%0.12%9.76E-01 2.92E+01 4.39E+00 7.03E-02 3.09E+00 1.58E+00
TOTAL 100%100%76 433 1,939 13 148 65
lbs/day
Based on the emission factors for Santa Clara County - San Francisco Bay Air Basin. % VMT based on EMFAC2011-SG for Santa Clara County.
Year 2013 w/2040 emission rates
Based on EMFAC2011-PL
Emission year Daily
2013 897,420
Percent of
VMT Adjust % VMT ROG NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.5
All Other Buses 0.06%0.06%1.13E-01 1.44E+00 4.67E-01 1.39E-02 2.25E-01 1.17E-01
LDA 55.06%55.06%7.55E+00 5.50E+01 5.69E+02 3.61E+00 5.06E+01 2.10E+01
LDT1 5.88%5.88%1.09E+00 7.27E+00 7.84E+01 4.49E-01 5.40E+00 2.25E+00
LDT2 18.32%18.32%3.23E+00 2.35E+01 2.32E+02 1.64E+00 1.68E+01 6.99E+00
LHD1 2.95%2.95%1.15E+00 1.95E+01 1.28E+01 4.94E-01 3.50E+00 1.53E+00
LHD2 0.45%0.45%2.83E-01 4.31E+00 2.51E+00 6.24E-02 7.43E-01 3.37E-01
MCY 0.63%0.63%2.35E+01 1.42E+01 1.95E+02 2.52E-02 5.58E-01 2.22E-01
MDV 11.94%11.94%3.20E+00 2.23E+01 2.14E+02 1.37E+00 1.10E+01 4.55E+00
MH 0.17%0.17%6.33E-02 2.09E+00 5.93E-01 2.49E-02 2.15E-01 9.72E-02
Motor Coach 0.06%0.06%2.22E-01 2.20E+00 1.03E+00 2.09E-02 2.52E-01 1.40E-01
OBUS 0.06%0.06%1.29E-02 2.16E-01 2.66E-01 8.43E-03 5.59E-02 2.23E-02
PTO 0.06%0.06%3.22E-01 2.52E+00 9.92E-01 2.46E-02 5.38E-02 4.95E-02
SBUS 0.04%0.04%1.11E-01 2.10E+00 8.46E-01 8.45E-03 4.25E-01 1.93E-01
T6 Ag 0.01%0.01%1.20E-02 1.49E-01 4.97E-02 1.52E-03 2.43E-02 1.26E-02
T6 CAIRP heavy 0.00%0.00%1.03E-03 1.20E-02 4.23E-03 1.48E-04 2.30E-03 1.16E-03
T6 CAIRP small 0.00%0.00%3.38E-03 3.81E-02 1.39E-02 5.12E-04 7.86E-03 3.92E-03
T6 instate construction heavy 0.04%0.04%7.02E-02 8.59E-01 2.89E-01 9.30E-03 1.47E-01 7.54E-02
T6 instate construction small 0.12%0.12%1.89E-01 2.20E+00 7.80E-01 2.74E-02 4.25E-01 2.14E-01
T6 instate heavy 0.25%0.25%4.18E-01 5.12E+00 1.72E+00 5.53E-02 8.77E-01 4.49E-01
T6 instate small 0.74%0.74%1.12E+00 1.31E+01 4.63E+00 1.63E-01 2.52E+00 1.27E+00
T6 OOS heavy 0.00%0.00%5.89E-04 6.86E-03 2.43E-03 8.48E-05 1.32E-03 6.63E-04
T6 OOS small 0.00%0.00%1.94E-03 2.18E-02 7.98E-03 2.94E-04 4.50E-03 2.25E-03
T6 Public 0.03%0.03%4.45E-02 5.22E-01 1.83E-01 7.71E-03 1.15E-01 5.59E-02
T6 utility 0.01%0.01%6.82E-03 6.71E-02 2.81E-02 1.23E-03 1.81E-02 8.76E-03
T6TS 0.17%0.17%3.79E-02 6.15E-01 7.81E-01 2.34E-02 1.55E-01 6.19E-02
T7 Ag 0.02%0.02%7.29E-02 7.36E-01 3.38E-01 6.47E-03 6.19E-02 3.55E-02
T7 CAIRP 0.42%0.42%1.59E+00 1.65E+01 7.38E+00 1.37E-01 1.33E+00 7.71E-01
T7 CAIRP construction 0.04%0.04%1.38E-01 1.43E+00 6.41E-01 1.19E-02 1.16E-01 6.70E-02
T7 NNOOS 0.47%0.47%1.55E+00 1.49E+01 7.20E+00 1.54E-01 1.40E+00 7.76E-01
T7 NOOS 0.15%0.15%5.78E-01 5.99E+00 2.69E+00 4.98E-02 4.85E-01 2.81E-01
T7 other port 0.04%0.04%1.80E-01 2.03E+00 8.39E-01 1.29E-02 1.39E-01 8.45E-02
T7 POAK 0.36%0.36%1.61E+00 1.81E+01 7.48E+00 1.15E-01 1.24E+00 7.54E-01
T7 POLA 0.00%0.00%0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
T7 Public 0.02%0.02%5.98E-02 1.18E+00 2.79E-01 7.92E-03 6.51E-02 3.37E-02
T7 Single 0.26%0.26%7.84E-01 7.18E+00 3.64E+00 8.30E-02 7.32E-01 3.98E-01
T7 single construction 0.09%0.09%2.91E-01 2.66E+00 1.35E+00 3.08E-02 2.71E-01 1.47E-01
T7 SWCV 0.07%0.07%1.84E-01 1.69E+00 8.51E-01 2.15E-02 1.81E-01 9.53E-02
T7 tractor 0.77%0.77%2.92E+00 3.02E+01 1.35E+01 2.50E-01 2.44E+00 1.41E+00
T7 tractor construction 0.07%0.07%2.68E-01 2.78E+00 1.24E+00 2.29E-02 2.24E-01 1.30E-01
T7 utility 0.00%0.00%9.42E-03 7.22E-02 4.36E-02 1.23E-03 9.95E-03 5.05E-03
T7IS 0.02%0.02%1.39E-01 1.96E+00 9.61E+00 2.83E-03 2.03E-02 8.08E-03
UBUS 0.12%0.12%6.93E-01 2.07E+01 3.12E+00 4.99E-02 2.19E+00 1.12E+00
TOTAL 100%100%54 307 1,377 9 105 46
lbs/day
Based on the emission factors for Santa Clara County - San Francisco Bay Air Basin. % VMT based on EMFAC2011-SG for Santa Clara County.
Year 2040 Alt A
Based on EMFAC2011-PL
Emission year Daily
2013 1,063,200
Percent of
VMT Adjust % VMT ROG NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.5
All Other Buses 0.06%0.06%1.34E-01 1.70E+00 5.53E-01 1.65E-02 2.66E-01 1.38E-01
LDA 55.06%55.06%8.95E+00 6.52E+01 6.74E+02 4.28E+00 5.99E+01 2.49E+01
LDT1 5.88%5.88%1.30E+00 8.61E+00 9.29E+01 5.32E-01 6.40E+00 2.66E+00
LDT2 18.32%18.32%3.83E+00 2.78E+01 2.74E+02 1.94E+00 1.99E+01 8.28E+00
LHD1 2.95%2.95%1.37E+00 2.31E+01 1.52E+01 5.86E-01 4.15E+00 1.81E+00
LHD2 0.45%0.45%3.36E-01 5.11E+00 2.97E+00 7.39E-02 8.80E-01 4.00E-01
MCY 0.63%0.63%2.79E+01 1.68E+01 2.31E+02 2.98E-02 6.61E-01 2.64E-01
MDV 11.94%11.94%3.80E+00 2.64E+01 2.54E+02 1.62E+00 1.30E+01 5.39E+00
MH 0.17%0.17%7.50E-02 2.47E+00 7.03E-01 2.95E-02 2.55E-01 1.15E-01
Motor Coach 0.06%0.06%2.63E-01 2.60E+00 1.22E+00 2.48E-02 2.98E-01 1.65E-01
OBUS 0.06%0.06%1.53E-02 2.56E-01 3.16E-01 9.99E-03 6.63E-02 2.64E-02
PTO 0.06%0.06%3.82E-01 2.99E+00 1.18E+00 2.91E-02 6.38E-02 5.87E-02
SBUS 0.04%0.04%1.32E-01 2.49E+00 1.00E+00 1.00E-02 5.03E-01 2.29E-01
T6 Ag 0.01%0.01%1.43E-02 1.77E-01 5.88E-02 1.80E-03 2.88E-02 1.49E-02
T6 CAIRP heavy 0.00%0.00%1.22E-03 1.42E-02 5.01E-03 1.75E-04 2.72E-03 1.37E-03
T6 CAIRP small 0.00%0.00%4.00E-03 4.51E-02 1.65E-02 6.07E-04 9.31E-03 4.64E-03
T6 instate construction heavy 0.04%0.04%8.32E-02 1.02E+00 3.43E-01 1.10E-02 1.74E-01 8.93E-02
T6 instate construction small 0.12%0.12%2.24E-01 2.60E+00 9.24E-01 3.25E-02 5.03E-01 2.53E-01
T6 instate heavy 0.25%0.25%4.96E-01 6.06E+00 2.04E+00 6.56E-02 1.04E+00 5.32E-01
T6 instate small 0.74%0.74%1.33E+00 1.55E+01 5.49E+00 1.93E-01 2.99E+00 1.50E+00
T6 OOS heavy 0.00%0.00%6.97E-04 8.13E-03 2.87E-03 1.01E-04 1.56E-03 7.85E-04
T6 OOS small 0.00%0.00%2.29E-03 2.59E-02 9.46E-03 3.48E-04 5.34E-03 2.66E-03
T6 Public 0.03%0.03%5.27E-02 6.18E-01 2.17E-01 9.14E-03 1.36E-01 6.63E-02
T6 utility 0.01%0.01%8.08E-03 7.95E-02 3.33E-02 1.45E-03 2.15E-02 1.04E-02
T6TS 0.17%0.17%4.50E-02 7.29E-01 9.25E-01 2.77E-02 1.84E-01 7.33E-02
T7 Ag 0.02%0.02%8.64E-02 8.72E-01 4.01E-01 7.67E-03 7.34E-02 4.20E-02
T7 CAIRP 0.42%0.42%1.88E+00 1.95E+01 8.74E+00 1.62E-01 1.58E+00 9.13E-01
T7 CAIRP construction 0.04%0.04%1.64E-01 1.69E+00 7.60E-01 1.41E-02 1.37E-01 7.93E-02
T7 NNOOS 0.47%0.47%1.84E+00 1.76E+01 8.53E+00 1.82E-01 1.66E+00 9.19E-01
T7 NOOS 0.15%0.15%6.85E-01 7.10E+00 3.18E+00 5.90E-02 5.75E-01 3.32E-01
T7 other port 0.04%0.04%2.14E-01 2.40E+00 9.94E-01 1.53E-02 1.64E-01 1.00E-01
T7 POAK 0.36%0.36%1.91E+00 2.14E+01 8.86E+00 1.36E-01 1.46E+00 8.93E-01
T7 POLA 0.00%0.00%0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
T7 Public 0.02%0.02%7.08E-02 1.40E+00 3.30E-01 9.38E-03 7.71E-02 3.99E-02
T7 Single 0.26%0.26%9.29E-01 8.51E+00 4.31E+00 9.83E-02 8.67E-01 4.71E-01
T7 single construction 0.09%0.09%3.44E-01 3.16E+00 1.60E+00 3.64E-02 3.22E-01 1.75E-01
T7 SWCV 0.07%0.07%2.18E-01 2.00E+00 1.01E+00 2.55E-02 2.15E-01 1.13E-01
T7 tractor 0.77%0.77%3.45E+00 3.58E+01 1.60E+01 2.96E-01 2.89E+00 1.67E+00
T7 tractor construction 0.07%0.07%3.17E-01 3.30E+00 1.47E+00 2.72E-02 2.65E-01 1.54E-01
T7 utility 0.00%0.00%1.12E-02 8.56E-02 5.17E-02 1.46E-03 1.18E-02 5.99E-03
T7IS 0.02%0.02%1.65E-01 2.32E+00 1.14E+01 3.35E-03 2.40E-02 9.57E-03
UBUS 0.12%0.12%8.20E-01 2.45E+01 3.69E+00 5.91E-02 2.60E+00 1.33E+00
TOTAL 100%100%64 364 1,631 11 124 54
lbs/day
Based on the emission factors for Santa Clara County - San Francisco Bay Air Basin. % VMT based on EMFAC2011-SG for Santa Clara County.
Year 2040 Alt B
Based on EMFAC2011-PL
Emission year Daily
2013 1,097,600
Percent of
VMT Adjust % VMT ROG NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.5
All Other Buses 0.06%0.06%1.38E-01 1.76E+00 5.71E-01 1.70E-02 2.75E-01 1.43E-01
LDA 55.06%55.06%9.24E+00 6.73E+01 6.96E+02 4.42E+00 6.19E+01 2.57E+01
LDT1 5.88%5.88%1.34E+00 8.89E+00 9.59E+01 5.49E-01 6.61E+00 2.75E+00
LDT2 18.32%18.32%3.95E+00 2.87E+01 2.83E+02 2.00E+00 2.06E+01 8.55E+00
LHD1 2.95%2.95%1.41E+00 2.38E+01 1.57E+01 6.05E-01 4.29E+00 1.87E+00
LHD2 0.45%0.45%3.47E-01 5.28E+00 3.07E+00 7.63E-02 9.09E-01 4.13E-01
MCY 0.63%0.63%2.88E+01 1.73E+01 2.38E+02 3.08E-02 6.83E-01 2.72E-01
MDV 11.94%11.94%3.92E+00 2.73E+01 2.62E+02 1.67E+00 1.34E+01 5.56E+00
MH 0.17%0.17%7.74E-02 2.55E+00 7.25E-01 3.05E-02 2.63E-01 1.19E-01
Motor Coach 0.06%0.06%2.72E-01 2.69E+00 1.26E+00 2.56E-02 3.08E-01 1.71E-01
OBUS 0.06%0.06%1.58E-02 2.65E-01 3.26E-01 1.03E-02 6.84E-02 2.72E-02
PTO 0.06%0.06%3.94E-01 3.09E+00 1.21E+00 3.01E-02 6.59E-02 6.06E-02
SBUS 0.04%0.04%1.36E-01 2.57E+00 1.03E+00 1.03E-02 5.19E-01 2.36E-01
T6 Ag 0.01%0.01%1.47E-02 1.83E-01 6.07E-02 1.86E-03 2.98E-02 1.54E-02
T6 CAIRP heavy 0.00%0.00%1.26E-03 1.46E-02 5.18E-03 1.81E-04 2.81E-03 1.41E-03
T6 CAIRP small 0.00%0.00%4.13E-03 4.66E-02 1.70E-02 6.27E-04 9.61E-03 4.79E-03
T6 instate construction heavy 0.04%0.04%8.59E-02 1.05E+00 3.54E-01 1.14E-02 1.80E-01 9.22E-02
T6 instate construction small 0.12%0.12%2.31E-01 2.69E+00 9.54E-01 3.35E-02 5.19E-01 2.61E-01
T6 instate heavy 0.25%0.25%5.12E-01 6.26E+00 2.11E+00 6.77E-02 1.07E+00 5.49E-01
T6 instate small 0.74%0.74%1.38E+00 1.60E+01 5.67E+00 1.99E-01 3.09E+00 1.55E+00
T6 OOS heavy 0.00%0.00%7.20E-04 8.39E-03 2.97E-03 1.04E-04 1.61E-03 8.11E-04
T6 OOS small 0.00%0.00%2.37E-03 2.67E-02 9.76E-03 3.59E-04 5.51E-03 2.75E-03
T6 Public 0.03%0.03%5.44E-02 6.38E-01 2.24E-01 9.43E-03 1.41E-01 6.84E-02
T6 utility 0.01%0.01%8.34E-03 8.20E-02 3.44E-02 1.50E-03 2.22E-02 1.07E-02
T6TS 0.17%0.17%4.64E-02 7.53E-01 9.55E-01 2.86E-02 1.90E-01 7.57E-02
T7 Ag 0.02%0.02%8.92E-02 9.01E-01 4.14E-01 7.92E-03 7.57E-02 4.34E-02
T7 CAIRP 0.42%0.42%1.94E+00 2.01E+01 9.03E+00 1.67E-01 1.63E+00 9.42E-01
T7 CAIRP construction 0.04%0.04%1.69E-01 1.75E+00 7.84E-01 1.45E-02 1.42E-01 8.19E-02
T7 NNOOS 0.47%0.47%1.90E+00 1.82E+01 8.81E+00 1.88E-01 1.71E+00 9.49E-01
T7 NOOS 0.15%0.15%7.08E-01 7.33E+00 3.29E+00 6.10E-02 5.93E-01 3.43E-01
T7 other port 0.04%0.04%2.21E-01 2.48E+00 1.03E+00 1.58E-02 1.69E-01 1.03E-01
T7 POAK 0.36%0.36%1.97E+00 2.21E+01 9.15E+00 1.41E-01 1.51E+00 9.22E-01
T7 POLA 0.00%0.00%0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
T7 Public 0.02%0.02%7.31E-02 1.44E+00 3.41E-01 9.69E-03 7.96E-02 4.12E-02
T7 Single 0.26%0.26%9.59E-01 8.78E+00 4.45E+00 1.02E-01 8.95E-01 4.86E-01
T7 single construction 0.09%0.09%3.56E-01 3.26E+00 1.65E+00 3.76E-02 3.32E-01 1.80E-01
T7 SWCV 0.07%0.07%2.25E-01 2.07E+00 1.04E+00 2.63E-02 2.22E-01 1.17E-01
T7 tractor 0.77%0.77%3.57E+00 3.70E+01 1.66E+01 3.06E-01 2.98E+00 1.73E+00
T7 tractor construction 0.07%0.07%3.28E-01 3.40E+00 1.52E+00 2.81E-02 2.74E-01 1.59E-01
T7 utility 0.00%0.00%1.15E-02 8.84E-02 5.34E-02 1.51E-03 1.22E-02 6.18E-03
T7IS 0.02%0.02%1.70E-01 2.39E+00 1.18E+01 3.46E-03 2.48E-02 9.88E-03
UBUS 0.12%0.12%8.47E-01 2.53E+01 3.81E+00 6.10E-02 2.68E+00 1.37E+00
TOTAL 100%100%66 376 1,684 11 128 56
lbs/day
Based on the emission factors for Santa Clara County - San Francisco Bay Air Basin. % VMT based on EMFAC2011-SG for Santa Clara County.
Year 2040 Current GP
Based on EMFAC2011-PL
Emission year Daily
2013 997,150
Percent of
VMT Adjust % VMT ROG NOx CO Sox PM10 PM2.5
All Other Buses 0.06%0.06%1.26E-01 1.60E+00 5.18E-01 1.54E-02 2.49E-01 1.30E-01
LDA 55.06%55.06%8.39E+00 6.11E+01 6.33E+02 4.02E+00 5.62E+01 2.34E+01
LDT1 5.88%5.88%1.21E+00 8.08E+00 8.72E+01 4.99E-01 6.00E+00 2.50E+00
LDT2 18.32%18.32%3.59E+00 2.61E+01 2.57E+02 1.82E+00 1.87E+01 7.77E+00
LHD1 2.95%2.95%1.28E+00 2.16E+01 1.42E+01 5.49E-01 3.89E+00 1.70E+00
LHD2 0.45%0.45%3.15E-01 4.79E+00 2.79E+00 6.93E-02 8.26E-01 3.75E-01
MCY 0.63%0.63%2.61E+01 1.57E+01 2.16E+02 2.79E-02 6.20E-01 2.47E-01
MDV 11.94%11.94%3.56E+00 2.48E+01 2.38E+02 1.52E+00 1.22E+01 5.05E+00
MH 0.17%0.17%7.03E-02 2.32E+00 6.59E-01 2.77E-02 2.39E-01 1.08E-01
Motor Coach 0.06%0.06%2.47E-01 2.44E+00 1.15E+00 2.32E-02 2.80E-01 1.55E-01
OBUS 0.06%0.06%1.44E-02 2.40E-01 2.96E-01 9.37E-03 6.21E-02 2.47E-02
PTO 0.06%0.06%3.58E-01 2.80E+00 1.10E+00 2.73E-02 5.98E-02 5.50E-02
SBUS 0.04%0.04%1.24E-01 2.33E+00 9.40E-01 9.39E-03 4.72E-01 2.15E-01
T6 Ag 0.01%0.01%1.34E-02 1.66E-01 5.52E-02 1.69E-03 2.70E-02 1.40E-02
T6 CAIRP heavy 0.00%0.00%1.14E-03 1.33E-02 4.70E-03 1.64E-04 2.55E-03 1.28E-03
T6 CAIRP small 0.00%0.00%3.75E-03 4.23E-02 1.55E-02 5.69E-04 8.73E-03 4.35E-03
T6 instate construction heavy 0.04%0.04%7.80E-02 9.54E-01 3.22E-01 1.03E-02 1.64E-01 8.38E-02
T6 instate construction small 0.12%0.12%2.10E-01 2.44E+00 8.67E-01 3.04E-02 4.72E-01 2.37E-01
T6 instate heavy 0.25%0.25%4.65E-01 5.69E+00 1.92E+00 6.15E-02 9.74E-01 4.99E-01
T6 instate small 0.74%0.74%1.25E+00 1.45E+01 5.15E+00 1.81E-01 2.80E+00 1.41E+00
T6 OOS heavy 0.00%0.00%6.54E-04 7.62E-03 2.70E-03 9.43E-05 1.46E-03 7.37E-04
T6 OOS small 0.00%0.00%2.15E-03 2.43E-02 8.87E-03 3.26E-04 5.00E-03 2.50E-03
T6 Public 0.03%0.03%4.94E-02 5.80E-01 2.04E-01 8.57E-03 1.28E-01 6.22E-02
T6 utility 0.01%0.01%7.57E-03 7.45E-02 3.12E-02 1.36E-03 2.02E-02 9.74E-03
T6TS 0.17%0.17%4.22E-02 6.84E-01 8.68E-01 2.60E-02 1.73E-01 6.88E-02
T7 Ag 0.02%0.02%8.10E-02 8.18E-01 3.76E-01 7.19E-03 6.88E-02 3.94E-02
T7 CAIRP 0.42%0.42%1.76E+00 1.83E+01 8.20E+00 1.52E-01 1.48E+00 8.56E-01
T7 CAIRP construction 0.04%0.04%1.53E-01 1.59E+00 7.12E-01 1.32E-02 1.29E-01 7.44E-02
T7 NNOOS 0.47%0.47%1.72E+00 1.65E+01 8.00E+00 1.71E-01 1.55E+00 8.62E-01
T7 NOOS 0.15%0.15%6.43E-01 6.66E+00 2.99E+00 5.54E-02 5.39E-01 3.12E-01
T7 other port 0.04%0.04%2.00E-01 2.25E+00 9.32E-01 1.44E-02 1.54E-01 9.39E-02
T7 POAK 0.36%0.36%1.79E+00 2.01E+01 8.31E+00 1.28E-01 1.37E+00 8.37E-01
T7 POLA 0.00%0.00%0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
T7 Public 0.02%0.02%6.64E-02 1.31E+00 3.10E-01 8.80E-03 7.23E-02 3.74E-02
T7 Single 0.26%0.26%8.71E-01 7.98E+00 4.04E+00 9.22E-02 8.14E-01 4.42E-01
T7 single construction 0.09%0.09%3.23E-01 2.96E+00 1.50E+00 3.42E-02 3.02E-01 1.64E-01
T7 SWCV 0.07%0.07%2.04E-01 1.88E+00 9.46E-01 2.39E-02 2.01E-01 1.06E-01
T7 tractor 0.77%0.77%3.24E+00 3.36E+01 1.50E+01 2.78E-01 2.71E+00 1.57E+00
T7 tractor construction 0.07%0.07%2.98E-01 3.09E+00 1.38E+00 2.55E-02 2.49E-01 1.44E-01
T7 utility 0.00%0.00%1.05E-02 8.03E-02 4.85E-02 1.37E-03 1.11E-02 5.62E-03
T7IS 0.02%0.02%1.55E-01 2.17E+00 1.07E+01 3.14E-03 2.25E-02 8.97E-03
UBUS 0.12%0.12%7.69E-01 2.30E+01 3.46E+00 5.54E-02 2.44E+00 1.24E+00
TOTAL 100%100%60 341 1,529 10 117 51
lbs/day
Based on the emission factors for Santa Clara County - San Francisco Bay Air Basin. % VMT based on EMFAC2011-SG for Santa Clara County.
Year 2040 MTons/Year
Based on EMFAC2011
Emission year Annual VMT GWP GWP
2040 310 1 MTons MTons
Percent of
VMT Adjust % VMT NOx N2O CO2 CO2e CO2w/Pavley +
LCF
CO2e w/ Pavley +
LCFS
All Other Buses 0.06%0.06%3.19E-01 0 2.99E+02 302 2.69E+02 272
LDA 55.06%55.06%1.22E+01 0 7.12E+04 71,361 4.25E+04 42,622
LDT1 5.88%5.88%1.61E+00 0 8.84E+03 8,860 5.48E+03 5,498
LDT2 18.32%18.32%5.21E+00 0 3.22E+04 32,294 2.20E+04 22,056
LHD1 2.95%2.95%4.32E+00 0 6.29E+03 6,329 5.66E+03 5,701
LHD2 0.45%0.45%9.56E-01 0 9.78E+02 987 8.80E+02 890
MCY 0.63%0.63%3.14E+00 0 3.84E+02 415 3.46E+02 377
MDV 11.94%11.94%4.94E+00 0 2.69E+04 26,960 1.89E+04 18,937
MH 0.17%0.17%4.62E-01 0 4.18E+02 423 3.76E+02 381
Motor Coach 0.06%0.06%4.87E-01 0 4.73E+02 478 4.26E+02 431
OBUS 0.06%0.06%4.80E-02 0 1.31E+02 132 1.18E+02 119
PTO 0.06%0.06%5.60E-01 0 5.72E+02 577 5.14E+02 520
SBUS 0.04%0.04%4.66E-01 0 1.56E+02 161 1.41E+02 145
T6 Ag 0.01%0.01%3.31E-02 0 3.26E+01 33 2.94E+01 30
T6 CAIRP heavy 0.00%0.00%2.65E-03 0 3.18E+00 3 2.87E+00 3
T6 CAIRP small 0.00%0.00%8.44E-03 0 1.10E+01 11 9.92E+00 10
T6 instate construction heavy 0.04%0.04%1.90E-01 0 2.00E+02 202 1.80E+02 182
T6 instate construction small 0.12%0.12%4.87E-01 0 5.90E+02 594 5.31E+02 535
T6 instate heavy 0.25%0.25%1.13E+00 0 1.19E+03 1,202 1.07E+03 1,083
T6 instate small 0.74%0.74%2.90E+00 0 3.50E+03 3,531 3.15E+03 3,181
T6 OOS heavy 0.00%0.00%1.52E-03 0 1.83E+00 2 1.64E+00 2
T6 OOS small 0.00%0.00%4.84E-03 0 6.32E+00 6 5.69E+00 6
T6 Public 0.03%0.03%1.16E-01 0 1.66E+02 167 1.49E+02 151
T6 utility 0.01%0.01%1.49E-02 0 2.64E+01 27 2.38E+01 24
T6TS 0.17%0.17%1.36E-01 0 3.65E+02 366 3.28E+02 329
T7 Ag 0.02%0.02%1.63E-01 0 1.47E+02 148 1.32E+02 134
T7 CAIRP 0.42%0.42%3.65E+00 0 3.10E+03 3,135 2.79E+03 2,825
T7 CAIRP construction 0.04%0.04%3.17E-01 0 2.69E+02 272 2.42E+02 245
T7 NNOOS 0.47%0.47%3.29E+00 0 3.49E+03 3,519 3.14E+03 3,170
T7 NOOS 0.15%0.15%1.33E+00 0 1.13E+03 1,142 1.02E+03 1,029
T7 other port 0.04%0.04%4.50E-01 0 2.92E+02 297 2.63E+02 268
T7 POAK 0.36%0.36%4.01E+00 0 2.61E+03 2,648 2.35E+03 2,387
T7 POLA 0.00%0.00%0.00E+00 0 0.00E+00 0 0.00E+00 0
T7 Public 0.02%0.02%2.61E-01 0 1.79E+02 182 1.61E+02 164
T7 Single 0.26%0.26%1.59E+00 0 1.88E+03 1,895 1.69E+03 1,707
T7 single construction 0.09%0.09%5.91E-01 0 6.97E+02 702 6.27E+02 633
T7 SWCV 0.07%0.07%3.75E-01 0 4.86E+02 490 4.38E+02 442
T7 tractor 0.77%0.77%6.70E+00 0 5.66E+03 5,728 5.10E+03 5,162
T7 tractor construction 0.07%0.07%6.17E-01 0 5.19E+02 525 4.67E+02 473
T7 utility 0.00%0.00%1.60E-02 0 2.80E+01 28 2.52E+01 25
T7IS 0.02%0.02%4.34E-01 0 4.76E+01 52 4.29E+01 47
UBUS 0.12%0.12%4.59E+00 0 1.14E+03 1,187 1.03E+03 1,073
TOTAL 100%100%68 2 176,703 177,375 122,594 123,266
438,701,690
N2O emissions were calculated using an off-model adjustment provided by CARB in AB 32 Technical Appendices. The off-model adjustment uses a linear regression correlating N2O with NOx. (N2O = 0.0167 + 0.0318 x NOx)
Daily vehicles miles traveled (VMT) multiplied by 347 days/year to account for reduced traffic on weekends and holidays. This assumption is consistent with the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) methodology within the Climate
Change Scoping Plan Measure Documentation Supplement.
Based on the emission factors for Santa Clara County - San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin
Year 2040 Alt A MTons/Year
Based on EMFAC2011
Emission year Annual VMT GWP GWP
2040 310 1 MTons MTons
Percent of
VMT Adjust % VMT NOx N2O CO2 CO2e CO2w/Pavley +
LCF
CO2e w/ Pavley +
LCFS
All Other Buses 0.06%0.06%2.68E-01 0 2.52E+02 254 2.26E+02 229
LDA 55.06%55.06%1.03E+01 0 5.99E+04 60,012 3.57E+04 35,844
LDT1 5.88%5.88%1.36E+00 0 7.44E+03 7,451 4.61E+03 4,623
LDT2 18.32%18.32%4.38E+00 0 2.71E+04 27,158 1.85E+04 18,548
LHD1 2.95%2.95%3.63E+00 0 5.29E+03 5,323 4.76E+03 4,794
LHD2 0.45%0.45%8.04E-01 0 8.22E+02 830 7.40E+02 748
MCY 0.63%0.63%2.64E+00 0 3.23E+02 349 2.91E+02 317
MDV 11.94%11.94%4.16E+00 0 2.26E+04 22,672 1.59E+04 15,925
MH 0.17%0.17%3.89E-01 0 3.52E+02 356 3.17E+02 320
Motor Coach 0.06%0.06%4.10E-01 0 3.98E+02 402 3.58E+02 362
OBUS 0.06%0.06%4.03E-02 0 1.10E+02 111 9.94E+01 100
PTO 0.06%0.06%4.71E-01 0 4.81E+02 485 4.33E+02 437
SBUS 0.04%0.04%3.92E-01 0 1.31E+02 135 1.18E+02 122
T6 Ag 0.01%0.01%2.79E-02 0 2.75E+01 28 2.47E+01 25
T6 CAIRP heavy 0.00%0.00%2.23E-03 0 2.68E+00 3 2.41E+00 2
T6 CAIRP small 0.00%0.00%7.10E-03 0 9.27E+00 9 8.34E+00 8
T6 instate construction heavy 0.04%0.04%1.60E-01 0 1.68E+02 170 1.51E+02 153
T6 instate construction small 0.12%0.12%4.10E-01 0 4.96E+02 500 4.46E+02 450
T6 instate heavy 0.25%0.25%9.54E-01 0 1.00E+03 1,011 9.01E+02 910
T6 instate small 0.74%0.74%2.44E+00 0 2.95E+03 2,969 2.65E+03 2,675
T6 OOS heavy 0.00%0.00%1.28E-03 0 1.54E+00 2 1.38E+00 1
T6 OOS small 0.00%0.00%4.07E-03 0 5.31E+00 5 4.78E+00 5
T6 Public 0.03%0.03%9.73E-02 0 1.40E+02 141 1.26E+02 127
T6 utility 0.01%0.01%1.25E-02 0 2.22E+01 22 2.00E+01 20
T6TS 0.17%0.17%1.15E-01 0 3.07E+02 308 2.76E+02 277
T7 Ag 0.02%0.02%1.37E-01 0 1.23E+02 125 1.11E+02 112
T7 CAIRP 0.42%0.42%3.07E+00 0 2.61E+03 2,636 2.35E+03 2,376
T7 CAIRP construction 0.04%0.04%2.67E-01 0 2.26E+02 229 2.04E+02 206
T7 NNOOS 0.47%0.47%2.77E+00 0 2.93E+03 2,959 2.64E+03 2,666
T7 NOOS 0.15%0.15%1.12E+00 0 9.49E+02 960 8.54E+02 865
T7 other port 0.04%0.04%3.78E-01 0 2.46E+02 250 2.21E+02 225
T7 POAK 0.36%0.36%3.37E+00 0 2.19E+03 2,227 1.97E+03 2,007
T7 POLA 0.00%0.00%0.00E+00 0 0.00E+00 0 0.00E+00 0
T7 Public 0.02%0.02%2.20E-01 0 1.51E+02 153 1.36E+02 138
T7 Single 0.26%0.26%1.34E+00 0 1.58E+03 1,594 1.42E+03 1,436
T7 single construction 0.09%0.09%4.97E-01 0 5.86E+02 591 5.27E+02 532
T7 SWCV 0.07%0.07%3.16E-01 0 4.09E+02 412 3.68E+02 371
T7 tractor 0.77%0.77%5.64E+00 0 4.76E+03 4,817 4.29E+03 4,341
T7 tractor construction 0.07%0.07%5.19E-01 0 4.37E+02 442 3.93E+02 398
T7 utility 0.00%0.00%1.35E-02 0 2.35E+01 24 2.12E+01 21
T7IS 0.02%0.02%3.65E-01 0 4.00E+01 44 3.60E+01 40
UBUS 0.12%0.12%3.86E+00 0 9.60E+02 998 8.64E+02 902
TOTAL 100%100%57 2 148,600 149,165 103,096 103,661
368,930,400
N2O emissions were calculated using an off-model adjustment provided by CARB in AB 32 Technical Appendices. The off-model adjustment uses a linear regression correlating N2O with NOx. (N2O = 0.0167 + 0.0318 x NOx)
Daily vehicles miles traveled (VMT) multiplied by 347 days/year to account for reduced traffic on weekends and holidays. This assumption is consistent with the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) methodology within the Climate
Change Scoping Plan Measure Documentation Supplement.
Based on the emission factors for Santa Clara County - San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin
Year 2040 Alt B MTons/Year
Based on EMFAC2011
Emission year Annual VMT GWP GWP
2040 310 1 MTons MTons
Percent of
VMT Adjust % VMT NOx N2O CO2 CO2e CO2w/Pavley +
LCF
CO2e w/ Pavley +
LCFS
All Other Buses 0.06%0.06%2.77E-01 0 2.60E+02 262 2.34E+02 236
LDA 55.06%55.06%1.06E+01 0 6.18E+04 61,954 3.69E+04 37,003
LDT1 5.88%5.88%1.40E+00 0 7.68E+03 7,692 4.76E+03 4,773
LDT2 18.32%18.32%4.52E+00 0 2.80E+04 28,037 1.91E+04 19,148
LHD1 2.95%2.95%3.75E+00 0 5.46E+03 5,495 4.91E+03 4,949
LHD2 0.45%0.45%8.30E-01 0 8.49E+02 857 7.64E+02 772
MCY 0.63%0.63%2.73E+00 0 3.33E+02 360 3.00E+02 327
MDV 11.94%11.94%4.29E+00 0 2.34E+04 23,406 1.64E+04 16,441
MH 0.17%0.17%4.01E-01 0 3.63E+02 367 3.27E+02 331
Motor Coach 0.06%0.06%4.23E-01 0 4.11E+02 415 3.70E+02 374
OBUS 0.06%0.06%4.16E-02 0 1.14E+02 114 1.03E+02 103
PTO 0.06%0.06%4.86E-01 0 4.96E+02 501 4.47E+02 451
SBUS 0.04%0.04%4.04E-01 0 1.36E+02 140 1.22E+02 126
T6 Ag 0.01%0.01%2.88E-02 0 2.83E+01 29 2.55E+01 26
T6 CAIRP heavy 0.00%0.00%2.30E-03 0 2.76E+00 3 2.49E+00 3
T6 CAIRP small 0.00%0.00%7.33E-03 0 9.57E+00 10 8.61E+00 9
T6 instate construction heavy 0.04%0.04%1.65E-01 0 1.74E+02 175 1.56E+02 158
T6 instate construction small 0.12%0.12%4.23E-01 0 5.12E+02 516 4.61E+02 465
T6 instate heavy 0.25%0.25%9.85E-01 0 1.03E+03 1,043 9.30E+02 940
T6 instate small 0.74%0.74%2.52E+00 0 3.04E+03 3,066 2.74E+03 2,761
T6 OOS heavy 0.00%0.00%1.32E-03 0 1.58E+00 2 1.43E+00 1
T6 OOS small 0.00%0.00%4.20E-03 0 5.49E+00 6 4.94E+00 5
T6 Public 0.03%0.03%1.00E-01 0 1.44E+02 145 1.30E+02 131
T6 utility 0.01%0.01%1.29E-02 0 2.29E+01 23 2.06E+01 21
T6TS 0.17%0.17%1.18E-01 0 3.17E+02 318 2.85E+02 286
T7 Ag 0.02%0.02%1.42E-01 0 1.27E+02 129 1.15E+02 116
T7 CAIRP 0.42%0.42%3.17E+00 0 2.69E+03 2,722 2.42E+03 2,453
T7 CAIRP construction 0.04%0.04%2.75E-01 0 2.34E+02 236 2.10E+02 213
T7 NNOOS 0.47%0.47%2.86E+00 0 3.03E+03 3,055 2.72E+03 2,752
T7 NOOS 0.15%0.15%1.15E+00 0 9.80E+02 991 8.82E+02 893
T7 other port 0.04%0.04%3.90E-01 0 2.54E+02 258 2.29E+02 232
T7 POAK 0.36%0.36%3.48E+00 0 2.26E+03 2,299 2.04E+03 2,072
T7 POLA 0.00%0.00%0.00E+00 0 0.00E+00 0 0.00E+00 0
T7 Public 0.02%0.02%2.27E-01 0 1.56E+02 158 1.40E+02 142
T7 Single 0.26%0.26%1.38E+00 0 1.63E+03 1,645 1.47E+03 1,482
T7 single construction 0.09%0.09%5.13E-01 0 6.05E+02 610 5.44E+02 549
T7 SWCV 0.07%0.07%3.26E-01 0 4.22E+02 426 3.80E+02 383
T7 tractor 0.77%0.77%5.82E+00 0 4.92E+03 4,973 4.42E+03 4,481
T7 tractor construction 0.07%0.07%5.35E-01 0 4.51E+02 456 4.06E+02 411
T7 utility 0.00%0.00%1.39E-02 0 2.43E+01 24 2.18E+01 22
T7IS 0.02%0.02%3.76E-01 0 4.13E+01 45 3.72E+01 41
UBUS 0.12%0.12%3.98E+00 0 9.91E+02 1,031 8.92E+02 931
TOTAL 100%100%59 2 153,408 153,991 106,432 107,015
380,867,200
N2O emissions were calculated using an off-model adjustment provided by CARB in AB 32 Technical Appendices. The off-model adjustment uses a linear regression correlating N2O with NOx. (N2O = 0.0167 + 0.0318 x NOx)
Daily vehicles miles traveled (VMT) multiplied by 347 days/year to account for reduced traffic on weekends and holidays. This assumption is consistent with the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) methodology within the Climate
Change Scoping Plan Measure Documentation Supplement.
Based on the emission factors for Santa Clara County - San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin
Year 2040 Current GP MTons/Year
Based on EMFAC2011
Emission year Annual VMT GWP GWP
2040 310 1 MTons MTons
Percent of
VMT Adjust % VMT NOx N2O CO2 CO2e CO2w/Pavley +
LCF
CO2e w/ Pavley +
LCFS
All Other Buses 0.06%0.06%2.52E-01 0 2.36E+02 238 2.12E+02 215
LDA 55.06%55.06%9.62E+00 0 5.62E+04 56,284 3.35E+04 33,617
LDT1 5.88%5.88%1.27E+00 0 6.98E+03 6,988 4.32E+03 4,336
LDT2 18.32%18.32%4.11E+00 0 2.54E+04 25,471 1.74E+04 17,396
LHD1 2.95%2.95%3.40E+00 0 4.96E+03 4,992 4.46E+03 4,496
LHD2 0.45%0.45%7.54E-01 0 7.71E+02 779 6.94E+02 702
MCY 0.63%0.63%2.48E+00 0 3.03E+02 327 2.73E+02 297
MDV 11.94%11.94%3.90E+00 0 2.12E+04 21,264 1.49E+04 14,936
MH 0.17%0.17%3.65E-01 0 3.30E+02 334 2.97E+02 301
Motor Coach 0.06%0.06%3.84E-01 0 3.73E+02 377 3.36E+02 340
OBUS 0.06%0.06%3.78E-02 0 1.04E+02 104 9.32E+01 94
PTO 0.06%0.06%4.42E-01 0 4.51E+02 455 4.06E+02 410
SBUS 0.04%0.04%3.67E-01 0 1.23E+02 127 1.11E+02 115
T6 Ag 0.01%0.01%2.61E-02 0 2.57E+01 26 2.32E+01 23
T6 CAIRP heavy 0.00%0.00%2.09E-03 0 2.51E+00 3 2.26E+00 2
T6 CAIRP small 0.00%0.00%6.66E-03 0 8.69E+00 9 7.82E+00 8
T6 instate construction heavy 0.04%0.04%1.50E-01 0 1.58E+02 159 1.42E+02 143
T6 instate construction small 0.12%0.12%3.84E-01 0 4.65E+02 469 4.19E+02 422
T6 instate heavy 0.25%0.25%8.95E-01 0 9.39E+02 948 8.45E+02 854
T6 instate small 0.74%0.74%2.28E+00 0 2.76E+03 2,785 2.49E+03 2,509
T6 OOS heavy 0.00%0.00%1.20E-03 0 1.44E+00 1 1.30E+00 1
T6 OOS small 0.00%0.00%3.82E-03 0 4.98E+00 5 4.49E+00 5
T6 Public 0.03%0.03%9.12E-02 0 1.31E+02 132 1.18E+02 119
T6 utility 0.01%0.01%1.17E-02 0 2.08E+01 21 1.87E+01 19
T6TS 0.17%0.17%1.08E-01 0 2.88E+02 289 2.59E+02 260
T7 Ag 0.02%0.02%1.29E-01 0 1.16E+02 117 1.04E+02 105
T7 CAIRP 0.42%0.42%2.88E+00 0 2.44E+03 2,473 2.20E+03 2,228
T7 CAIRP construction 0.04%0.04%2.50E-01 0 2.12E+02 215 1.91E+02 194
T7 NNOOS 0.47%0.47%2.60E+00 0 2.75E+03 2,775 2.47E+03 2,500
T7 NOOS 0.15%0.15%1.05E+00 0 8.90E+02 900 8.01E+02 811
T7 other port 0.04%0.04%3.55E-01 0 2.31E+02 234 2.08E+02 211
T7 POAK 0.36%0.36%3.16E+00 0 2.06E+03 2,088 1.85E+03 1,883
T7 POLA 0.00%0.00%0.00E+00 0 0.00E+00 0 0.00E+00 0
T7 Public 0.02%0.02%2.06E-01 0 1.41E+02 143 1.27E+02 129
T7 Single 0.26%0.26%1.26E+00 0 1.48E+03 1,495 1.33E+03 1,347
T7 single construction 0.09%0.09%4.66E-01 0 5.49E+02 554 4.94E+02 499
T7 SWCV 0.07%0.07%2.96E-01 0 3.84E+02 387 3.45E+02 348
T7 tractor 0.77%0.77%5.29E+00 0 4.47E+03 4,518 4.02E+03 4,071
T7 tractor construction 0.07%0.07%4.86E-01 0 4.10E+02 414 3.69E+02 373
T7 utility 0.00%0.00%1.26E-02 0 2.20E+01 22 1.98E+01 20
T7IS 0.02%0.02%3.42E-01 0 3.76E+01 41 3.38E+01 37
UBUS 0.12%0.12%3.62E+00 0 9.01E+02 936 8.11E+02 846
TOTAL 100%100%54 2 139,369 139,898 96,692 97,221
346,011,050
N2O emissions were calculated using an off-model adjustment provided by CARB in AB 32 Technical Appendices. The off-model adjustment uses a linear regression correlating N2O with NOx. (N2O = 0.0167 + 0.0318 x NOx)
Daily vehicles miles traveled (VMT) multiplied by 347 days/year to account for reduced traffic on weekends and holidays. This assumption is consistent with the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) methodology within the Climate
Change Scoping Plan Measure Documentation Supplement.
Based on the emission factors for Santa Clara County - San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin
Santa Clara 2035 - all Model Years (40 MPH)
Region_Ty
pe Region CalYr Season Veh ROG_RUNEX NOx_RUNEX CO_RUNEX SOx_RUNEX PM10_RUN EX PM10_PMTW PM10_PMBW PM10_Total
PM2.5_RUN
EX PM2.5_PMTW PM2.5_PMBW PM2_5_Total CO2_RUNEX
CO2(Pavley I +
LCFS)_RUNEX
VMT from
EMFAC-SG %VMT
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual All Other Buses 9.09E-02 1.15E+00 3.75E-01 1.12E-02 3.79E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.80E-01 3.49E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 9.37E-02 1.08E+03 9.75E+02 33,671 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual LDA 6.93E-03 5.05E-02 5.23E-01 3.32E-03 1.67E-03 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.64E-02 1.55E-03 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.93E-02 2.95E+02 1.76E+02 29,449,252 55%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual LDT1 9.39E-03 6.25E-02 6.74E-01 3.86E-03 1.67E-03 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.64E-02 1.55E-03 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.93E-02 3.43E+02 2.12E+02 3,146,695 6%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual LDT2 8.92E-03 6.48E-02 6.39E-01 4.51E-03 1.65E-03 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.64E-02 1.53E-03 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.93E-02 4.01E+02 2.74E+02 9,797,829 18%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual LHD1 1.98E-02 3.34E-01 2.20E-01 8.49E-03 4.14E-03 9.03E-03 4.70E-02 6.01E-02 3.81E-03 2.26E-03 2.01E-02 2.62E-02 4.87E+02 4.38E+02 1,575,359 3%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual LHD2 3.21E-02 4.89E-01 2.84E-01 7.07E-03 8.07E-03 1.02E-02 6.59E-02 8.42E-02 7.42E-03 2.56E-03 2.82E-02 3.82E-02 5.00E+02 4.50E+02 238,615 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual MCY 1.89E+00 1.14E+00 1.57E+01 2.02E-03 1.81E-04 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.49E-02 1.57E-04 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.79E-02 1.39E+02 1.25E+02 335,850 1%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual MDV 1.36E-02 9.44E-02 9.07E-01 5.78E-03 1.62E-03 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.64E-02 1.50E-03 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.93E-02 5.14E+02 3.61E+02 6,385,961 12%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual MH 1.88E-02 6.19E-01 1.76E-01 7.40E-03 6.17E-03 8.53E-03 4.91E-02 6.38E-02 5.68E-03 2.13E-03 2.11E-02 2.89E-02 5.60E+02 5.04E+02 91,006 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual Motor Coach 1.74E-01 1.72E+00 8.10E-01 1.64E-02 5.51E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.97E-01 5.07E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 1.10E-01 1.67E+03 1.51E+03 34,464 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual OBUS 1.04E-02 1.74E-01 2.14E-01 6.77E-03 1.36E-04 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.49E-02 1.26E-04 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.79E-02 4.75E+02 4.28E+02 33,682 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual PTO 2.65E-01 2.07E+00 8.15E-01 2.02E-02 4.42E-02 4.42E-02 4.07E-02 4.07E-02 2.12E+03 1.91E+03 32,916 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual SBUS 1.38E-01 2.61E+00 1.05E+00 1.05E-02 3.23E-02 1.05E-02 4.84E-01 5.27E-01 2.97E-02 2.63E-03 2.07E-01 2.40E-01 8.75E+02 7.87E+02 21,788 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 Ag 8.86E-02 1.10E+00 3.65E-01 1.12E-02 3.66E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.79E-01 3.37E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 9.26E-02 1.08E+03 9.75E+02 3,675 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 CAIRP heavy 7.74E-02 9.02E-01 3.19E-01 1.12E-02 3.08E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.73E-01 2.83E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 8.72E-02 1.08E+03 9.75E+02 358 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 CAIRP small 7.36E-02 8.29E-01 3.03E-01 1.12E-02 2.88E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.71E-01 2.65E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 8.53E-02 1.08E+03 9.75E+02 1,241 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 instate construction heavy 8.43E-02 1.03E+00 3.47E-01 1.12E-02 3.44E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.77E-01 3.17E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 9.05E-02 1.08E+03 9.75E+02 22,519 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 instate construction small 7.71E-02 8.95E-01 3.18E-01 1.12E-02 3.06E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.73E-01 2.82E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 8.70E-02 1.08E+03 9.75E+02 66,386 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 instate heavy 8.44E-02 1.03E+00 3.48E-01 1.12E-02 3.45E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.77E-01 3.17E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 9.06E-02 1.08E+03 9.75E+02 134,036 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 instate small 7.71E-02 8.96E-01 3.18E-01 1.12E-02 3.06E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.73E-01 2.82E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 8.70E-02 1.08E+03 9.75E+02 394,357 1%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 OOS heavy 7.74E-02 9.02E-01 3.19E-01 1.12E-02 3.08E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.73E-01 2.83E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 8.72E-02 1.08E+03 9.75E+02 206 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 OOS small 7.36E-02 8.29E-01 3.03E-01 1.12E-02 2.88E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.71E-01 2.65E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 8.53E-02 1.08E+03 9.75E+02 712 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 Public 6.44E-02 7.55E-01 2.65E-01 1.12E-02 2.40E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.66E-01 2.21E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 8.10E-02 1.08E+03 9.75E+02 18,675 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 utility 6.20E-02 6.10E-01 2.55E-01 1.12E-02 2.26E-02 1.20E-02 1.30E-01 1.65E-01 2.08E-02 3.00E-03 5.59E-02 7.97E-02 1.08E+03 9.75E+02 2,974 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6TS 1.10E-02 1.78E-01 2.26E-01 6.77E-03 1.46E-04 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.49E-02 1.36E-04 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.79E-02 4.75E+02 4.28E+02 93,529 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 Ag 1.85E-01 1.86E+00 8.57E-01 1.64E-02 5.90E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.57E-01 5.43E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 8.98E-02 1.67E+03 1.51E+03 10,677 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 CAIRP 1.90E-01 1.97E+00 8.84E-01 1.64E-02 6.18E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.59E-01 5.68E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 9.23E-02 1.67E+03 1.51E+03 225,754 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 CAIRP construction 1.90E-01 1.97E+00 8.84E-01 1.64E-02 6.18E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.59E-01 5.68E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 9.23E-02 1.67E+03 1.51E+03 19,615 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 NNOOS 1.65E-01 1.58E+00 7.66E-01 1.64E-02 5.12E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.49E-01 4.71E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 8.26E-02 1.67E+03 1.51E+03 253,965 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 NOOS 1.90E-01 1.97E+00 8.84E-01 1.64E-02 6.18E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.59E-01 5.68E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 9.23E-02 1.67E+03 1.51E+03 82,214 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 other port 2.29E-01 2.57E+00 1.06E+00 1.64E-02 7.80E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.76E-01 7.18E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 1.07E-01 1.67E+03 1.51E+03 21,305 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 POAK 2.29E-01 2.57E+00 1.06E+00 1.64E-02 7.80E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.76E-01 7.18E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 1.07E-01 1.67E+03 1.51E+03 190,001 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 POLA 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 Public 1.24E-01 2.45E+00 5.79E-01 1.64E-02 3.75E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.35E-01 3.45E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 6.99E-02 1.68E+03 1.51E+03 13,014 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 Single 1.55E-01 1.42E+00 7.18E-01 1.64E-02 4.68E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.45E-01 4.31E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 7.85E-02 1.67E+03 1.51E+03 136,918 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 single construction 1.55E-01 1.42E+00 7.18E-01 1.64E-02 4.68E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.45E-01 4.31E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 7.86E-02 1.67E+03 1.51E+03 50,742 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 SWCV 1.40E-01 1.29E+00 6.50E-01 1.64E-02 4.05E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.38E-01 3.73E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 7.27E-02 1.67E+03 1.51E+03 35,418 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 tractor 1.91E-01 1.98E+00 8.88E-01 1.64E-02 6.20E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.60E-01 5.71E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 9.25E-02 1.67E+03 1.51E+03 412,430 1%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 tractor construction 1.91E-01 1.99E+00 8.90E-01 1.64E-02 6.22E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.60E-01 5.72E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 9.27E-02 1.67E+03 1.51E+03 37,832 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 utility 1.25E-01 9.59E-01 5.79E-01 1.64E-02 3.44E-02 3.60E-02 6.17E-02 1.32E-01 3.16E-02 9.00E-03 2.65E-02 6.71E-02 1.67E+03 1.51E+03 2,036 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7IS 3.08E-01 4.33E+00 2.13E+01 6.26E-03 1.34E-04 8.00E-03 3.67E-02 4.49E-02 1.24E-04 2.00E-03 1.57E-02 1.79E-02 4.75E+02 4.28E+02 12,216 0%
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual UBUS 2.92E-01 8.73E+00 1.32E+00 2.10E-02 1.56E-01 8.00E-03 7.62E-01 9.26E-01 1.44E-01 2.00E-03 3.27E-01 4.72E-01 2.17E+03 1.96E+03 64,056 0%
53,483,950 100%
g/mile
Santa Clara 2035 - all Model Years (40 MPH)
Region_Ty
pe Region CalYr Season Veh
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual All Other Buses
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual LDA
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual LDT1
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual LDT2
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual LHD1
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual LHD2
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual MCY
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual MDV
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual MH
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual Motor Coach
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual OBUS
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual PTO
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual SBUS
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 Ag
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 CAIRP heavy
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 CAIRP small
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 instate construction heavy
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 instate construction small
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 instate heavy
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 instate small
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 OOS heavy
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 OOS small
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 Public
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 utility
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6TS
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 Ag
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 CAIRP
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 CAIRP construction
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 NNOOS
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 NOOS
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 other port
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 POAK
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 POLA
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 Public
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 Single
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 single construction
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 SWCV
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 tractor
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 tractor construction
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 utility
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7IS
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual UBUS
##
ROG_RUNEX NOx_RUNEX CO_RUNEX SOx_RUNEX PM10_PMTW PM10_PMBW PM10_RUNEX PM10_Total
PM2_5_PMT
W
PM2_5_PMB
W
PM2_5_RUNE
X PM2_5_Total CO2_RUNEX
CO2(Pavley I +
LCFS)_RUNEX
2.00E-04 2.55E-03 8.26E-04 2.46E-05 8.36E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.97E-04 7.69E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 2.07E-04 2.39E+00 2.15E+00
1.53E-05 1.11E-04 1.15E-03 7.31E-06 3.69E-06 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 1.02E-04 3.42E-06 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 4.26E-05 6.50E-01 3.88E-01
2.07E-05 1.38E-04 1.49E-03 8.50E-06 3.69E-06 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 1.02E-04 3.42E-06 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 4.26E-05 7.55E-01 4.68E-01
1.97E-05 1.43E-04 1.41E-03 9.95E-06 3.64E-06 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 1.02E-04 3.38E-06 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 4.25E-05 8.84E-01 6.04E-01
4.36E-05 7.36E-04 4.85E-04 1.87E-05 9.13E-06 1.99E-05 1.04E-04 1.33E-04 8.41E-06 4.98E-06 4.44E-05 5.78E-05 1.07E+00 9.65E-01
7.08E-05 1.08E-03 6.26E-04 1.56E-05 1.78E-05 2.25E-05 1.45E-04 1.86E-04 1.64E-05 5.63E-06 6.22E-05 8.42E-05 1.10E+00 9.91E-01
4.17E-03 2.51E-03 3.46E-02 4.46E-06 3.98E-07 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 9.91E-05 3.45E-07 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 3.95E-05 3.07E-01 2.77E-01
2.99E-05 2.08E-04 2.00E-03 1.27E-05 3.57E-06 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 1.02E-04 3.31E-06 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 4.24E-05 1.13E+00 7.95E-01
4.15E-05 1.37E-03 3.88E-04 1.63E-05 1.36E-05 1.88E-05 1.08E-04 1.41E-04 1.25E-05 4.70E-06 4.64E-05 6.36E-05 1.24E+00 1.11E+00
3.85E-04 3.80E-03 1.79E-03 3.61E-05 1.21E-04 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 4.35E-04 1.12E-04 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 2.41E-04 3.69E+00 3.32E+00
2.29E-05 3.83E-04 4.72E-04 1.49E-05 2.99E-07 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 9.90E-05 2.77E-07 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 3.94E-05 1.05E+00 9.43E-01
5.84E-04 4.57E-03 1.80E-03 4.45E-05 9.75E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 9.75E-05 8.97E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 8.97E-05 4.67E+00 4.20E+00
3.04E-04 5.74E-03 2.31E-03 2.31E-05 7.12E-05 2.32E-05 1.07E-03 1.16E-03 6.55E-05 5.80E-06 4.57E-04 5.29E-04 1.93E+00 1.74E+00
1.95E-04 2.42E-03 8.05E-04 2.46E-05 8.08E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.95E-04 7.43E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 2.04E-04 2.39E+00 2.15E+00
1.71E-04 1.99E-03 7.03E-04 2.46E-05 6.79E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.82E-04 6.25E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 1.92E-04 2.39E+00 2.15E+00
1.62E-04 1.83E-03 6.68E-04 2.46E-05 6.34E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.77E-04 5.83E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 1.88E-04 2.39E+00 2.15E+00
1.86E-04 2.27E-03 7.66E-04 2.46E-05 7.59E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.90E-04 6.98E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 2.00E-04 2.39E+00 2.15E+00
1.70E-04 1.97E-03 7.00E-04 2.46E-05 6.75E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.81E-04 6.21E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 1.92E-04 2.39E+00 2.15E+00
1.86E-04 2.28E-03 7.67E-04 2.46E-05 7.60E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.90E-04 6.99E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 2.00E-04 2.39E+00 2.15E+00
1.70E-04 1.97E-03 7.00E-04 2.46E-05 6.75E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.81E-04 6.21E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 1.92E-04 2.39E+00 2.15E+00
1.71E-04 1.99E-03 7.03E-04 2.46E-05 6.79E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.82E-04 6.25E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 1.92E-04 2.39E+00 2.15E+00
1.62E-04 1.83E-03 6.68E-04 2.46E-05 6.34E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.77E-04 5.83E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 1.88E-04 2.39E+00 2.15E+00
1.42E-04 1.66E-03 5.85E-04 2.46E-05 5.30E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.67E-04 4.87E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 1.79E-04 2.39E+00 2.15E+00
1.37E-04 1.34E-03 5.63E-04 2.46E-05 4.98E-05 2.65E-05 2.87E-04 3.64E-04 4.58E-05 6.61E-06 1.23E-04 1.76E-04 2.39E+00 2.15E+00
2.42E-05 3.92E-04 4.98E-04 1.49E-05 3.22E-07 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 9.90E-05 2.99E-07 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 3.94E-05 1.05E+00 9.43E-01
4.07E-04 4.11E-03 1.89E-03 3.61E-05 1.30E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.46E-04 1.20E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 1.98E-04 3.69E+00 3.32E+00
4.19E-04 4.34E-03 1.95E-03 3.61E-05 1.36E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.52E-04 1.25E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 2.03E-04 3.69E+00 3.32E+00
4.19E-04 4.35E-03 1.95E-03 3.61E-05 1.36E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.52E-04 1.25E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 2.03E-04 3.69E+00 3.32E+00
3.64E-04 3.48E-03 1.69E-03 3.61E-05 1.13E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.28E-04 1.04E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 1.82E-04 3.69E+00 3.32E+00
4.19E-04 4.34E-03 1.95E-03 3.61E-05 1.36E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.52E-04 1.25E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 2.03E-04 3.69E+00 3.32E+00
5.05E-04 5.67E-03 2.35E-03 3.61E-05 1.72E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.87E-04 1.58E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 2.36E-04 3.69E+00 3.32E+00
5.05E-04 5.67E-03 2.35E-03 3.61E-05 1.72E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.87E-04 1.58E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 2.36E-04 3.69E+00 3.32E+00
0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
2.74E-04 5.40E-03 1.28E-03 3.63E-05 8.26E-05 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 2.98E-04 7.60E-05 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 1.54E-04 3.70E+00 3.33E+00
3.41E-04 3.13E-03 1.58E-03 3.61E-05 1.03E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.19E-04 9.50E-05 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 1.73E-04 3.69E+00 3.32E+00
3.41E-04 3.13E-03 1.58E-03 3.61E-05 1.03E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.19E-04 9.50E-05 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 1.73E-04 3.69E+00 3.32E+00
3.09E-04 2.85E-03 1.43E-03 3.61E-05 8.93E-05 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.05E-04 8.22E-05 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 1.60E-04 3.69E+00 3.32E+00
4.21E-04 4.37E-03 1.96E-03 3.61E-05 1.37E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.52E-04 1.26E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 2.04E-04 3.69E+00 3.32E+00
4.22E-04 4.38E-03 1.96E-03 3.61E-05 1.37E-04 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 3.53E-04 1.26E-04 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 2.04E-04 3.69E+00 3.32E+00
2.76E-04 2.11E-03 1.28E-03 3.61E-05 7.58E-05 7.94E-05 1.36E-04 2.91E-04 6.97E-05 1.98E-05 5.83E-05 1.48E-04 3.69E+00 3.32E+00
6.79E-04 9.54E-03 4.69E-02 1.38E-05 2.94E-07 1.76E-05 8.10E-05 9.89E-05 2.73E-07 4.41E-06 3.47E-05 3.94E-05 1.05E+00 9.43E-01
6.44E-04 1.93E-02 2.90E-03 4.64E-05 3.44E-04 1.76E-05 1.68E-03 2.04E-03 3.17E-04 4.41E-06 7.20E-04 1.04E-03 4.79E+00 4.31E+00
lbs/Mile
Santa Clara 2035 - all Model Years (40 MPH)
Region_Ty
pe Region CalYr Season Veh
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual All Other Buses
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual LDA
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual LDT1
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual LDT2
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual LHD1
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual LHD2
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual MCY
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual MDV
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual MH
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual Motor Coach
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual OBUS
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual PTO
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual SBUS
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 Ag
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 CAIRP heavy
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 CAIRP small
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 instate construction heavy
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 instate construction small
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 instate heavy
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 instate small
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 OOS heavy
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 OOS small
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 Public
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6 utility
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T6TS
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 Ag
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 CAIRP
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 CAIRP construction
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 NNOOS
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 NOOS
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 other port
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 POAK
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 POLA
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 Public
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 Single
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 single construction
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 SWCV
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 tractor
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 tractor construction
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7 utility
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual T7IS
County Santa Clara 2035 Annual UBUS
##
ROG_RUNEX NOx_RUNEX CO_RUNEX SOx_RUNEX PM10_PMTW PM10_PMBW PM10_RUNEX PM10_Total
PM2_5_PMT
W
PM2_5_PMB
W
PM2_5_RUNE
X PM2_5_Total CO2_RUNEX
CO2(Pavley I +
LCFS)_RUNEX
9.09E-08 1.15E-06 3.75E-07 1.12E-08 3.79E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.80E-07 3.49E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 9.37E-08 1.08E-03 9.75E-04
6.93E-09 5.05E-08 5.23E-07 3.32E-09 1.67E-09 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.64E-08 1.55E-09 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.93E-08 2.95E-04 1.76E-04
9.39E-09 6.25E-08 6.74E-07 3.86E-09 1.67E-09 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.64E-08 1.55E-09 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.93E-08 3.43E-04 2.12E-04
8.92E-09 6.48E-08 6.39E-07 4.51E-09 1.65E-09 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.64E-08 1.53E-09 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.93E-08 4.01E-04 2.74E-04
1.98E-08 3.34E-07 2.20E-07 8.49E-09 4.14E-09 9.03E-09 4.70E-08 6.01E-08 3.81E-09 2.26E-09 2.01E-08 2.62E-08 4.87E-04 4.38E-04
3.21E-08 4.89E-07 2.84E-07 7.07E-09 8.07E-09 1.02E-08 6.59E-08 8.42E-08 7.42E-09 2.56E-09 2.82E-08 3.82E-08 5.00E-04 4.50E-04
1.89E-06 1.14E-06 1.57E-05 2.02E-09 1.81E-10 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.49E-08 1.57E-10 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.79E-08 1.39E-04 1.25E-04
1.36E-08 9.44E-08 9.07E-07 5.78E-09 1.62E-09 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.64E-08 1.50E-09 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.93E-08 5.14E-04 3.61E-04
1.88E-08 6.19E-07 1.76E-07 7.40E-09 6.17E-09 8.53E-09 4.91E-08 6.38E-08 5.68E-09 2.13E-09 2.11E-08 2.89E-08 5.60E-04 5.04E-04
1.74E-07 1.72E-06 8.10E-07 1.64E-08 5.51E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.97E-07 5.07E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 1.10E-07 1.67E-03 1.51E-03
1.04E-08 1.74E-07 2.14E-07 6.77E-09 1.36E-10 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.49E-08 1.26E-10 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.79E-08 4.75E-04 4.28E-04
2.65E-07 2.07E-06 8.15E-07 2.02E-08 4.42E-08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 4.42E-08 4.07E-08 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 4.07E-08 2.12E-03 1.91E-03
1.38E-07 2.61E-06 1.05E-06 1.05E-08 3.23E-08 1.05E-08 4.84E-07 5.27E-07 2.97E-08 2.63E-09 2.07E-07 2.40E-07 8.75E-04 7.87E-04
8.86E-08 1.10E-06 3.65E-07 1.12E-08 3.66E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.79E-07 3.37E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 9.26E-08 1.08E-03 9.75E-04
7.74E-08 9.02E-07 3.19E-07 1.12E-08 3.08E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.73E-07 2.83E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 8.72E-08 1.08E-03 9.75E-04
7.36E-08 8.29E-07 3.03E-07 1.12E-08 2.88E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.71E-07 2.65E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 8.53E-08 1.08E-03 9.75E-04
8.43E-08 1.03E-06 3.47E-07 1.12E-08 3.44E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.77E-07 3.17E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 9.05E-08 1.08E-03 9.75E-04
7.71E-08 8.95E-07 3.18E-07 1.12E-08 3.06E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.73E-07 2.82E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 8.70E-08 1.08E-03 9.75E-04
8.44E-08 1.03E-06 3.48E-07 1.12E-08 3.45E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.77E-07 3.17E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 9.06E-08 1.08E-03 9.75E-04
7.71E-08 8.96E-07 3.18E-07 1.12E-08 3.06E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.73E-07 2.82E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 8.70E-08 1.08E-03 9.75E-04
7.74E-08 9.02E-07 3.19E-07 1.12E-08 3.08E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.73E-07 2.83E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 8.72E-08 1.08E-03 9.75E-04
7.36E-08 8.29E-07 3.03E-07 1.12E-08 2.88E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.71E-07 2.65E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 8.53E-08 1.08E-03 9.75E-04
6.44E-08 7.55E-07 2.65E-07 1.12E-08 2.40E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.66E-07 2.21E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 8.10E-08 1.08E-03 9.75E-04
6.20E-08 6.10E-07 2.55E-07 1.12E-08 2.26E-08 1.20E-08 1.30E-07 1.65E-07 2.08E-08 3.00E-09 5.59E-08 7.97E-08 1.08E-03 9.75E-04
1.10E-08 1.78E-07 2.26E-07 6.77E-09 1.46E-10 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.49E-08 1.36E-10 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.79E-08 4.75E-04 4.28E-04
1.85E-07 1.86E-06 8.57E-07 1.64E-08 5.90E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.57E-07 5.43E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 8.98E-08 1.67E-03 1.51E-03
1.90E-07 1.97E-06 8.84E-07 1.64E-08 6.18E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.59E-07 5.68E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 9.23E-08 1.67E-03 1.51E-03
1.90E-07 1.97E-06 8.84E-07 1.64E-08 6.18E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.59E-07 5.68E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 9.23E-08 1.67E-03 1.51E-03
1.65E-07 1.58E-06 7.66E-07 1.64E-08 5.12E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.49E-07 4.71E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 8.26E-08 1.67E-03 1.51E-03
1.90E-07 1.97E-06 8.84E-07 1.64E-08 6.18E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.59E-07 5.68E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 9.23E-08 1.67E-03 1.51E-03
2.29E-07 2.57E-06 1.06E-06 1.64E-08 7.80E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.76E-07 7.18E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 1.07E-07 1.67E-03 1.51E-03
2.29E-07 2.57E-06 1.06E-06 1.64E-08 7.80E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.76E-07 7.18E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 1.07E-07 1.67E-03 1.51E-03
0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
1.24E-07 2.45E-06 5.79E-07 1.64E-08 3.75E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.35E-07 3.45E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 6.99E-08 1.68E-03 1.51E-03
1.55E-07 1.42E-06 7.18E-07 1.64E-08 4.68E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.45E-07 4.31E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 7.85E-08 1.67E-03 1.51E-03
1.55E-07 1.42E-06 7.18E-07 1.64E-08 4.68E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.45E-07 4.31E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 7.86E-08 1.67E-03 1.51E-03
1.40E-07 1.29E-06 6.50E-07 1.64E-08 4.05E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.38E-07 3.73E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 7.27E-08 1.67E-03 1.51E-03
1.91E-07 1.98E-06 8.88E-07 1.64E-08 6.20E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.60E-07 5.71E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 9.25E-08 1.67E-03 1.51E-03
1.91E-07 1.99E-06 8.90E-07 1.64E-08 6.22E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.60E-07 5.72E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 9.27E-08 1.67E-03 1.51E-03
1.25E-07 9.59E-07 5.79E-07 1.64E-08 3.44E-08 3.60E-08 6.17E-08 1.32E-07 3.16E-08 9.00E-09 2.65E-08 6.71E-08 1.67E-03 1.51E-03
3.08E-07 4.33E-06 2.13E-05 6.26E-09 1.34E-10 8.00E-09 3.67E-08 4.49E-08 1.24E-10 2.00E-09 1.57E-08 1.79E-08 4.75E-04 4.28E-04
2.92E-07 8.73E-06 1.32E-06 2.10E-08 1.56E-07 8.00E-09 7.62E-07 9.26E-07 1.44E-07 2.00E-09 3.27E-07 4.72E-07 2.17E-03 1.96E-03
MTons/Mile
Criteria Air Pollutant and GHG Emissions
Area Sources
Area Sources - Consumer Products
Source: CalEEMod Users Guide. Version 2013.2.2.
Residential and Non-Residential Consumer Product Use
Emissions = EF x Building Area
SCAQMD EF = 2.04E-05 lbs/sqft/day
AVERAGE HOUSING SQFT ASSUMPTIONS
Year Structure was Built
Percent of
Housing Stock (1)
Average Square
Feet of New
Single Family
Homes(2)
Average Square
Feet
2010 or later 0.1%2,448 2
2000 to 2009 7.5%2,404 180
1980 to 1999 22.6%1,968 445
1979 or earlier 69.9%1,699 1,188
1,815
Sources/Notes:
2013 2040 2020
CEQA Baseline
Proposed Project
(Alt C)AB 32 Target Year Reduced Intensity Reduced Intensity No Project Scenario
Net Non-Residential SQFT 12,659,343 18,043,253 14,055,172 14,400,987 16,543,253 13,900,987
Net Housing Units 21,399 25,820 22,545 23,294 24,715 23,294
Residential SQFT 38,841,689 49,664,297 41,647,550 43,480,649 46,959,257 43,480,649
lbs VOC per day 1,051 1,381 1,136 1,181 1,295 1,171
Source
1 New housing units constructed post-2013 assumed to be 2,448 square feet.
(1) United States Census Bureau, American FactFinder, City of Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California, Physical Housing Characteristics for Occupied Housing Units, 2012 American
Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, Year structure built.
(2) United States Census Bureau, Characteristics of New Housing, Characteristics of New Single-Family Houses Completed, Median and Average Square Feet by Location. Obtained
from http://www.census.gov/construction/chars/
Area Sources - Criteria Air Pollutants
ROG Exhaust NOx Exhaust CO Exhaust SO2 Exhaust PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5
Exhaust*
Proportioned Based on:
Construction Equipment
The percentage of building permits issued in Cupertino
compared to Santa Clara County.93 619 612 1 39 38
Lawn & Garden Equipment
The percentage of residential units in Cupertino
compared to Santa Clara County.138 36 1,759 0 5 5
Light Commercial Equipment
The percentage of employment in Cupertino compared
to Santa Clara County.40 79 1,098 0 8 8
TOTAL 271 733 3,469 1 52 52
* assumes PM2.5 is 99 percent of PM10
ROG Exhaust NOx Exhaust CO Exhaust SO2 Exhaust PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5
Exhaust*
Forecast Adjusted for:
Construction Equipment Annual assumed to be similar to historic 93 619 612 1 39 38
Lawn & Garden Equipment Proportional to population growth 169 44 2,152 0 6 6
Light Commercial Equipment Proportional to employment growth 64 127 1,774 0 14 14
TOTAL 326 790 4,537 1 58 58
ROG Exhaust NOx Exhaust CO Exhaust SO2 Exhaust PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5
Exhaust*
Forecast Adjusted for:
Construction Equipment Annual assumed to be similar to historic 93 619 612 1 39 38
Lawn & Garden Equipment Proportional to population growth 151 39 1,927 0 5 5
Light Commercial Equipment Proportional to employment growth 47 94 1,307 0 10 10
TOTAL 291 752 3,846 1 54 54
ROG Exhaust NOx Exhaust CO Exhaust SO2 Exhaust PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5
Exhaust*
Forecast Adjusted for:
Construction Equipment Annual assumed to be similar to historic 93 619 612 1 39 38
Lawn & Garden Equipment Proportional to population growth 161 42 2,054 0 6 6
Light Commercial Equipment Proportional to employment growth 57 112 1,567 0 12 12
TOTAL 311 773 4,233 1 57 56
ROG Exhaust NOx Exhaust CO Exhaust SO2 Exhaust PM10
Exhaust
PM2.5
Exhaust*
Forecast Adjusted for:
Construction Equipment Annual assumed to be similar to historic 93 619 612 1 39 38
Lawn & Garden Equipment Proportional to population growth 151 39 1,927 0 5 5
Light Commercial Equipment Proportional to employment growth 45 89 1,237 0 10 9
TOTAL 289 747 3,776 1 54 53
Sources
Building Permits
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
http://censtats.census.gov/bldg/bldgprmt.shtml
Employment
Source. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010. Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics. http://lehd.ces.census.gov/
Population
Source. U.S. Census Bureau, 2010.
2040 Alt B lbs/day
Current General Plan lbs/day
CEQA Baseline 2013 lbs/day
Proposed Project 2040 lbs/day
2040 Alt A lbs/day
Other Emissions Sources - Off-road Equipment
Source: OFFROAD2007. Based on equipment use in Santa Clara County.
Year 2013 BAU Proportioned Based on:
MTCO2e
Construction Equipment
The percentage of building permits issued in
Cupertino compared to Santa Clara County.11,261
Lawn & Garden Equipment
The percentage of residential units in Cupertino
compared to Santa Clara County.1,111
Light Commercial Equipment
The percentage of employment in Cupertino
compared to Santa Clara County.1,634
TOTAL 14,006
Year 2020 BAU Forecast Adjusted for:
Proposed
Project 2020 2040 Alt A 2040 Alt B Current GP
Construction Equipment Annual assumed to be similar to historic 11,261 11,261 11,261 11,261 11,261
Lawn & Garden Equipment Proportional to population growth 1,359 1,175 1,217 1,297 1,217
Light Commercial Equipment Proportional to employment growth 2,639 1,894 1,944 2,332 1,840
TOTAL 15,259 14,331 14,422 14,890 14,318
Adjusted Business as Usual - Low Carbon Fuel Standard
Year 2040 Adjusted Notes
Proposed
Project 2020 2040 Alt A 2040 Alt B Current GP
Construction Equipment With LCFS (10% reduction)10,135 10,135 10,135 10,135 10,135
Lawn&Garden Equipment With LCFS (10% reduction)1,223 1,058 1,095 1,167 1,095
Light Commercial Equipment With LCFS (10% reduction)2,375 1,705 1,750 2,099 1,656
TOTAL 13,733 12,898 12,980 13,401 12,886
reduction 1,526 1,433 1,442 1,489 1,432
MTCO2e
MTCO2e
On December 29, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California issued several rulings in the federal lawsuits challenging the LCFS. One of the court’s rulings preliminarily
enjoins the CARB from enforcing the regulation during the pendency of the litigation. In January 2012, CARB appealed the decision and on April 23, 2012, the Night Circuit Court granted
CARB’s motion for a stay of the injunction while it continues to consider CARB’s appeal of the lower court’s decision.
Construction Tons/Day MTons/Year
Equipment Fuel MaxHP Population Activity Consumption ROG Exhaust NOX Exhaust CO Exhaust SO2 Exhaust PM Exhaust CO2 Exhaust N2O Exhaust CH4 Exhaust CO2e CO2e
Tampers/Rammers G2 15 1.76E+02 8.80E+01 1.77E+01 1.12E-03 8.62E-04 4.79E-02 3.77E-06 7.68E-04 9.16E-02 1.37E-04 6.94E-05 1.36E-01 43
Plate Compactors G2 15 1.51E+01 8.54E+00 1.72E+00 1.08E-04 8.36E-05 4.65E-03 3.66E-07 7.46E-05 8.90E-03 1.33E-05 6.73E-06 1.32E-02 4
Asphalt Pavers G4 15 3.85E+00 4.18E+00 2.45E+00 1.87E-04 1.36E-04 7.14E-03 3.35E-07 9.84E-05 1.17E-02 1.19E-05 1.03E-05 1.56E-02 5
Asphalt Pavers G4 25 6.58E+00 7.14E+00 1.06E+01 8.25E-04 5.27E-04 3.17E-02 1.24E-06 4.11E-04 4.91E-02 3.16E-05 4.56E-05 5.99E-02 19
Asphalt Pavers G4 50 3.31E+00 3.56E+00 8.31E+00 2.86E-04 4.11E-04 9.04E-03 7.89E-07 4.97E-06 6.49E-02 1.86E-05 1.58E-05 7.10E-02 22
Asphalt Pavers G4 120 1.82E+00 1.96E+00 7.63E+00 1.91E-04 5.57E-04 3.64E-03 6.49E-07 5.21E-06 6.72E-02 1.55E-05 1.06E-05 7.22E-02 23
Tampers/Rammers G4 15 8.14E+00 4.06E+00 1.99E+00 1.53E-04 1.08E-04 5.82E-03 2.71E-07 7.98E-05 9.51E-03 1.04E-05 8.46E-06 1.29E-02 4
Plate Compactors G4 5 2.99E+02 1.47E+02 2.71E+01 3.85E-03 1.71E-03 5.92E-02 5.30E-06 5.01E-05 1.54E-01 2.42E-04 2.13E-04 2.33E-01 74
Plate Compactors G4 15 3.17E+02 1.79E+02 7.79E+01 5.88E-03 4.28E-03 2.27E-01 1.06E-05 3.12E-03 3.73E-01 4.33E-04 3.26E-04 5.14E-01 162
Rollers G4 5 3.33E+01 7.57E+00 2.07E+00 2.51E-04 1.11E-04 5.05E-03 3.84E-07 3.62E-06 1.11E-02 1.41E-05 1.39E-05 1.58E-02 5
Rollers G4 15 5.38E+01 4.58E+01 2.52E+01 1.90E-03 1.39E-03 7.35E-02 3.45E-06 1.01E-03 1.21E-01 1.26E-04 1.05E-04 1.62E-01 51
Rollers G4 25 3.63E+01 3.09E+01 3.71E+01 2.87E-03 1.83E-03 1.11E-01 4.37E-06 1.44E-03 1.72E-01 1.21E-04 1.59E-04 2.13E-01 67
Rollers G4 50 2.33E+00 3.97E+00 1.07E+01 4.88E-04 5.97E-04 1.44E-02 9.56E-07 6.03E-06 7.87E-02 2.44E-05 2.70E-05 8.68E-02 27
Rollers G4 120 4.38E+00 7.47E+00 3.47E+01 1.21E-03 2.94E-03 2.18E-02 2.86E-06 2.30E-05 2.96E-01 7.29E-05 6.71E-05 3.20E-01 101
Paving Equipment G4 5 4.18E+02 1.95E+02 3.86E+01 5.42E-03 2.40E-03 8.51E-02 7.52E-06 7.10E-05 2.18E-01 3.31E-04 3.00E-04 3.27E-01 103
Paving Equipment G4 15 7.07E+02 3.88E+02 2.26E+02 1.70E-02 1.24E-02 6.59E-01 3.09E-05 9.08E-03 1.08E+00 1.10E-03 9.44E-04 1.44E+00 454
Paving Equipment G4 25 1.57E+01 8.62E+00 1.14E+01 8.79E-04 5.60E-04 3.42E-02 1.34E-06 4.44E-04 5.30E-02 3.56E-05 4.87E-05 6.51E-02 20
Paving Equipment G4 50 9.05E+00 4.34E+00 9.82E+00 1.90E-04 3.18E-04 7.75E-03 9.95E-07 6.27E-06 8.18E-02 1.75E-05 1.05E-05 8.74E-02 28
Paving Equipment G4 120 2.33E+00 1.12E+00 4.06E+00 4.93E-05 1.69E-04 1.16E-03 3.59E-07 2.88E-06 3.72E-02 5.97E-06 2.73E-06 3.91E-02 12
Surfacing Equipment G4 5 7.67E+01 4.21E+01 8.53E+00 1.24E-03 5.50E-04 1.83E-02 1.69E-06 1.59E-05 4.88E-02 7.39E-05 6.88E-05 7.32E-02 23
Surfacing Equipment G4 15 2.28E+02 3.15E+02 1.22E+02 9.66E-03 7.05E-03 3.55E-01 1.66E-05 4.89E-03 5.84E-01 7.36E-04 5.34E-04 8.23E-01 259
Surfacing Equipment G4 25 3.12E+00 4.30E+00 4.09E+00 3.31E-04 2.12E-04 1.23E-02 4.81E-07 1.59E-04 1.90E-02 1.53E-05 1.83E-05 2.41E-02 8
Signal Boards G4 5 9.47E-01 3.38E-01 1.11E-01 1.43E-05 6.34E-06 2.60E-04 2.10E-08 1.98E-07 6.07E-04 7.18E-07 7.92E-07 8.46E-04 0
Signal Boards G4 15 6.74E+00 5.25E+00 3.16E+00 2.37E-04 1.73E-04 9.19E-03 4.31E-07 1.27E-04 1.51E-02 1.51E-05 1.31E-05 2.01E-02 6
Trenchers G4 15 6.24E+01 7.42E+01 4.85E+01 3.74E-03 2.73E-03 1.41E-01 6.61E-06 1.94E-03 2.32E-01 2.26E-04 2.07E-04 3.06E-01 96
Trenchers G4 25 4.83E+01 5.75E+01 8.13E+01 6.43E-03 4.11E-03 2.44E-01 9.56E-06 3.16E-03 3.77E-01 2.50E-04 3.56E-04 4.62E-01 145
Trenchers G4 50 2.12E+01 2.34E+01 5.21E+01 2.05E-03 2.86E-03 6.04E-02 4.86E-06 3.06E-05 4.00E-01 1.28E-04 1.13E-04 4.42E-01 139
Trenchers G4 120 7.04E+00 7.76E+00 3.32E+01 9.72E-04 2.77E-03 1.76E-02 2.79E-06 2.24E-05 2.89E-01 7.12E-05 5.38E-05 3.12E-01 98
Bore/Drill Rigs G4 15 1.78E+00 6.06E-01 4.75E-01 3.52E-05 2.49E-05 1.39E-03 6.47E-08 1.90E-05 2.27E-03 1.96E-06 1.95E-06 2.92E-03 1
Bore/Drill Rigs G4 25 8.86E+00 3.01E+00 4.37E+00 3.30E-04 2.06E-04 1.31E-02 5.14E-07 1.70E-04 2.03E-02 1.28E-05 1.83E-05 2.47E-02 8
Bore/Drill Rigs G4 50 1.03E+00 3.01E-01 8.06E-01 2.40E-05 4.33E-05 7.08E-04 7.99E-08 5.03E-07 6.57E-03 1.76E-06 1.33E-06 7.14E-03 2
Bore/Drill Rigs G4 120 4.71E+00 1.38E+00 9.16E+00 1.96E-04 7.51E-04 3.61E-03 7.93E-07 6.36E-06 8.20E-02 1.56E-05 1.08E-05 8.71E-02 27
Bore/Drill Rigs G4 175 1.17E+00 3.42E-01 3.10E+00 3.89E-05 2.93E-04 9.33E-04 2.81E-07 2.25E-06 2.83E-02 4.93E-06 2.16E-06 2.99E-02 9
Concrete/Industrial Saws G4 5 3.27E+01 1.17E+01 3.14E+00 4.06E-04 1.80E-04 7.37E-03 5.95E-07 5.61E-06 1.72E-02 2.23E-05 2.25E-05 2.46E-02 8
Concrete/Industrial Saws G4 15 1.47E+02 1.25E+02 8.68E+01 6.55E-03 4.78E-03 2.53E-01 1.18E-05 3.48E-03 4.16E-01 3.89E-04 3.63E-04 5.44E-01 171
Concrete/Industrial Saws G4 25 4.60E+01 3.91E+01 5.29E+01 4.09E-03 2.61E-03 1.58E-01 6.23E-06 2.06E-03 2.46E-01 1.64E-04 2.26E-04 3.02E-01 95
Concrete/Industrial Saws G4 50 3.82E+00 6.40E+00 1.78E+01 1.90E-04 2.74E-04 1.29E-02 1.83E-06 1.16E-05 1.51E-01 2.12E-05 1.05E-05 1.58E-01 50
Concrete/Industrial Saws G4 120 2.19E+00 3.67E+00 1.73E+01 7.79E-05 1.76E-04 3.51E-03 1.56E-06 1.25E-05 1.61E-01 1.28E-05 4.31E-06 1.65E-01 52
Cement and Mortar Mixers G4 5 5.94E+02 1.50E+02 3.85E+01 4.85E-03 2.15E-03 9.17E-02 7.23E-06 6.82E-05 2.09E-01 2.76E-04 2.69E-04 3.00E-01 95
Cement and Mortar Mixers G4 15 1.01E+03 2.54E+02 1.26E+02 1.19E-02 5.70E-03 3.81E-01 1.62E-05 4.67E-03 5.67E-01 5.92E-04 6.61E-04 7.64E-01 241
Cement and Mortar Mixers G4 25 4.24E+00 1.07E+00 1.67E+00 1.51E-04 6.79E-05 5.14E-03 1.89E-07 6.14E-05 7.46E-03 4.33E-06 8.36E-06 8.98E-03 3
Cranes G4 50 1.17E+00 1.33E+00 2.60E+00 1.03E-04 1.43E-04 3.05E-03 2.42E-07 1.53E-06 1.99E-02 6.77E-06 5.71E-06 2.21E-02 7
Cranes G4 120 2.33E+00 2.65E+00 9.06E+00 2.69E-04 7.58E-04 4.86E-03 7.61E-07 6.10E-06 7.88E-02 2.16E-05 1.49E-05 8.58E-02 27
Cranes G4 175 9.33E-02 1.06E-01 5.71E-01 8.58E-06 5.76E-05 1.91E-04 5.14E-08 4.12E-07 5.18E-03 1.22E-06 4.74E-07 5.57E-03 2
Crushing/Proc. Equipment G4 15 1.62E+00 1.28E+00 9.68E-01 7.27E-05 5.31E-05 2.82E-03 1.32E-07 3.89E-05 4.64E-03 4.16E-06 4.02E-06 6.01E-03 2
Crushing/Proc. Equipment G4 25 1.06E+00 8.39E-01 1.16E+00 8.94E-05 5.71E-05 3.48E-03 1.37E-07 4.53E-05 5.40E-03 3.55E-06 4.95E-06 6.60E-03 2
Crushing/Proc. Equipment G4 120 1.35E+00 8.94E-01 7.05E+00 1.76E-04 5.83E-04 3.22E-03 6.02E-07 4.82E-06 6.23E-02 1.12E-05 9.76E-06 6.60E-02 21
Rough Terrain Forklifts G4 50 4.66E-01 5.28E-01 1.76E+00 6.98E-05 9.70E-05 2.06E-03 1.64E-07 1.03E-06 1.35E-02 3.58E-06 3.86E-06 1.47E-02 5
Rough Terrain Forklifts G4 120 6.62E+00 7.50E+00 3.94E+01 1.17E-03 3.30E-03 2.11E-02 3.31E-06 2.66E-05 3.43E-01 7.70E-05 6.45E-05 3.68E-01 116
Rough Terrain Forklifts G4 175 2.33E-01 2.64E-01 2.16E+00 3.25E-05 2.18E-04 7.24E-04 1.95E-07 1.56E-06 1.96E-02 3.79E-06 1.80E-06 2.08E-02 7
Rubber Tired Loaders G4 50 1.17E+00 1.64E+00 4.03E+00 1.63E-04 2.15E-04 4.94E-03 3.71E-07 2.34E-06 3.05E-02 9.24E-06 9.00E-06 3.36E-02 11
Rubber Tired Loaders G4 120 7.74E+00 1.09E+01 4.17E+01 1.26E-03 3.33E-03 2.32E-02 3.49E-06 2.80E-05 3.61E-01 9.13E-05 6.96E-05 3.91E-01 123
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes G4 120 4.10E+00 9.79E+00 2.88E+01 4.83E-04 1.13E-03 1.51E-02 2.44E-06 1.96E-05 2.53E-01 4.82E-05 2.66E-05 2.69E-01 85
Skid Steer Loaders G4 15 3.18E+00 2.78E+00 2.23E+00 1.71E-04 1.24E-04 6.49E-03 3.05E-07 8.95E-05 1.07E-02 9.41E-06 9.44E-06 1.38E-02 4
Skid Steer Loaders G4 25 2.12E+02 1.86E+02 2.09E+02 1.63E-02 1.04E-02 6.25E-01 2.46E-05 8.12E-03 9.69E-01 7.10E-04 9.05E-04 1.21E+00 380
Construction Tons/Day MTons/Year
Equipment Fuel MaxHP Population Activity Consumption ROG Exhaust NOX Exhaust CO Exhaust SO2 Exhaust PM Exhaust CO2 Exhaust N2O Exhaust CH4 Exhaust CO2e CO2e
Skid Steer Loaders G4 50 3.18E+01 2.70E+01 5.19E+01 6.64E-04 1.01E-03 4.17E-02 5.27E-06 3.32E-05 4.33E-01 8.04E-05 3.68E-05 4.59E-01 144
Skid Steer Loaders G4 120 1.90E+01 1.62E+01 6.93E+01 4.33E-04 1.19E-03 1.68E-02 6.19E-06 4.96E-05 6.41E-01 6.45E-05 2.40E-05 6.61E-01 208
Dumpers/Tenders G4 5 3.03E+01 1.24E+01 1.68E+00 2.44E-04 1.08E-04 3.63E-03 3.32E-07 3.13E-06 9.62E-03 1.75E-05 1.35E-05 1.53E-02 5
Dumpers/Tenders G4 15 6.46E+01 2.64E+01 1.01E+01 9.35E-04 4.91E-04 3.04E-02 1.32E-06 3.82E-04 4.61E-02 5.57E-05 5.18E-05 6.45E-02 20
Dumpers/Tenders G4 25 1.20E+01 4.90E+00 4.01E+00 3.58E-04 1.75E-04 1.23E-02 4.58E-07 1.49E-04 1.81E-02 1.46E-05 1.98E-05 2.30E-02 7
Dumpers/Tenders G4 120 8.40E-01 2.92E-01 7.56E-01 1.66E-05 6.20E-05 3.05E-04 6.53E-08 5.23E-07 6.75E-03 2.00E-06 9.18E-07 7.39E-03 2
Other Construction Equipment G4 175 3.26E+00 3.32E+00 1.82E+01 7.62E-05 2.72E-04 5.66E-03 1.66E-06 1.33E-05 1.67E-01 1.47E-05 4.22E-06 1.72E-01 54
Pavers D 25 8.76E-01 1.97E+00 1.68E+00 2.43E-05 1.48E-04 7.88E-05 2.33E-07 7.41E-06 1.84E-02 0.00E+00 2.19E-06 1.84E-02 6
Pavers D 50 5.09E+01 1.16E+02 1.53E+02 7.94E-03 1.71E-02 2.09E-02 2.10E-05 1.79E-03 1.63E+00 0.00E+00 7.16E-04 1.65E+00 518
Pavers D 120 6.01E+01 1.37E+02 4.36E+02 9.51E-03 5.73E-02 3.47E-02 5.57E-05 4.99E-03 4.74E+00 0.00E+00 8.58E-04 4.76E+00 1,498
Pavers D 175 3.73E+01 8.53E+01 5.00E+02 7.57E-03 5.87E-02 3.32E-02 6.15E-05 3.28E-03 5.47E+00 0.00E+00 6.83E-04 5.48E+00 1,726
Pavers D 250 4.50E+00 1.03E+01 9.07E+01 1.06E-03 1.00E-02 3.12E-03 1.12E-05 3.88E-04 9.98E-01 0.00E+00 9.60E-05 1.00E+00 315
Pavers D 500 4.62E+00 1.05E+01 1.12E+02 1.20E-03 1.11E-02 4.88E-03 1.21E-05 4.31E-04 1.23E+00 0.00E+00 1.08E-04 1.23E+00 388
Plate Compactors D 15 1.88E+01 3.10E+01 6.09E+00 7.76E-05 4.86E-04 4.07E-04 1.04E-06 1.90E-05 6.67E-02 0.00E+00 7.01E-06 6.68E-02 21
Rollers D 15 3.53E+01 6.74E+01 1.94E+01 2.48E-04 1.55E-03 1.30E-03 3.31E-06 6.02E-05 2.13E-01 0.00E+00 2.23E-05 2.13E-01 67
Rollers D 25 1.48E+01 2.82E+01 1.71E+01 2.27E-04 1.44E-03 7.73E-04 2.38E-06 5.76E-05 1.88E-01 0.00E+00 2.05E-05 1.88E-01 59
Rollers D 50 4.60E+01 8.85E+01 1.07E+02 4.53E-03 1.14E-02 1.29E-02 1.48E-05 1.08E-03 1.15E+00 0.00E+00 4.08E-04 1.16E+00 365
Rollers D 120 2.47E+02 4.75E+02 1.28E+03 2.34E-02 1.48E-01 9.64E-02 1.64E-04 1.27E-02 1.40E+01 0.00E+00 2.11E-03 1.40E+01 4,421
Rollers D 175 9.93E+01 1.91E+02 9.42E+02 1.19E-02 9.65E-02 5.92E-02 1.16E-04 5.24E-03 1.03E+01 0.00E+00 1.07E-03 1.03E+01 3,249
Rollers D 250 1.41E+01 2.71E+01 1.88E+02 1.71E-03 1.78E-02 5.26E-03 2.33E-05 6.10E-04 2.07E+00 0.00E+00 1.54E-04 2.07E+00 653
Rollers D 500 9.87E+00 1.90E+01 1.89E+02 1.57E-03 1.60E-02 5.99E-03 2.04E-05 5.63E-04 2.08E+00 0.00E+00 1.42E-04 2.08E+00 656
Scrapers D 120 2.28E+00 6.95E+00 2.99E+01 6.51E-04 3.87E-03 2.41E-03 3.82E-06 3.41E-04 3.26E-01 0.00E+00 5.87E-05 3.27E-01 103
Scrapers D 175 2.09E+01 6.36E+01 4.30E+02 6.57E-03 4.94E-02 2.89E-02 5.29E-05 2.81E-03 4.70E+00 0.00E+00 5.93E-04 4.71E+00 1,483
Scrapers D 250 2.03E+01 6.20E+01 5.90E+02 6.98E-03 6.34E-02 1.99E-02 7.30E-05 2.45E-03 6.49E+00 0.00E+00 6.30E-04 6.50E+00 2,047
Scrapers D 500 5.60E+01 1.71E+02 2.49E+03 2.72E-02 2.41E-01 1.03E-01 2.69E-04 9.37E-03 2.74E+01 0.00E+00 2.45E-03 2.75E+01 8,642
Scrapers D 750 1.06E+00 3.24E+00 8.18E+01 8.96E-04 8.08E-03 3.39E-03 9.05E-06 3.11E-04 9.00E-01 0.00E+00 8.08E-05 9.02E-01 284
Paving Equipment D 25 1.52E+00 3.45E+00 1.98E+00 2.64E-05 1.67E-04 8.97E-05 2.76E-07 6.69E-06 2.18E-02 0.00E+00 2.38E-06 2.18E-02 7
Paving Equipment D 50 1.29E+00 2.95E+00 3.30E+00 1.72E-04 3.70E-04 4.49E-04 4.55E-07 3.87E-05 3.52E-02 0.00E+00 1.55E-05 3.55E-02 11
Paving Equipment D 120 1.85E+01 4.25E+01 1.06E+02 2.31E-03 1.39E-02 8.40E-03 1.36E-05 1.22E-03 1.16E+00 0.00E+00 2.08E-04 1.16E+00 367
Paving Equipment D 175 8.71E+00 2.00E+01 9.21E+01 1.38E-03 1.08E-02 6.06E-03 1.13E-05 6.00E-04 1.01E+00 0.00E+00 1.25E-04 1.01E+00 319
Paving Equipment D 250 2.45E+00 5.63E+00 3.12E+01 3.59E-04 3.43E-03 1.06E-03 3.87E-06 1.31E-04 3.44E-01 0.00E+00 3.24E-05 3.45E-01 109
Surfacing Equipment D 50 1.17E+00 1.45E+00 9.48E-01 3.45E-05 9.85E-05 1.02E-04 1.32E-07 8.59E-06 1.02E-02 0.00E+00 3.11E-06 1.03E-02 3
Surfacing Equipment D 120 2.34E-01 2.90E-01 8.46E-01 1.40E-05 9.45E-05 6.11E-05 1.08E-07 7.48E-06 9.24E-03 0.00E+00 1.27E-06 9.27E-03 3
Surfacing Equipment D 175 1.75E-01 2.18E-01 8.50E-01 9.71E-06 8.41E-05 5.14E-05 1.05E-07 4.25E-06 9.32E-03 0.00E+00 8.76E-07 9.34E-03 3
Surfacing Equipment D 250 3.51E-01 4.35E-01 2.66E+00 2.23E-05 2.43E-04 7.34E-05 3.30E-07 8.17E-06 2.93E-02 0.00E+00 2.01E-06 2.93E-02 9
Surfacing Equipment D 500 2.92E+00 3.63E+00 3.64E+01 2.78E-04 3.01E-03 1.16E-03 3.93E-06 1.03E-04 4.01E-01 0.00E+00 2.50E-05 4.02E-01 126
Surfacing Equipment D 750 2.03E-01 2.52E-01 3.97E+00 3.08E-05 3.36E-04 1.27E-04 4.40E-07 1.13E-05 4.37E-02 0.00E+00 2.78E-06 4.38E-02 14
Signal Boards D 15 1.64E+02 3.38E+02 9.52E+01 1.21E-03 7.60E-03 6.37E-03 1.62E-05 2.97E-04 1.04E+00 0.00E+00 1.09E-04 1.04E+00 328
Signal Boards D 50 8.18E-01 1.20E+00 2.01E+00 6.90E-05 2.05E-04 2.07E-04 2.80E-07 1.77E-05 2.17E-02 0.00E+00 6.22E-06 2.18E-02 7
Signal Boards D 120 1.34E+01 1.96E+01 7.20E+01 1.15E-03 7.65E-03 5.11E-03 9.23E-06 6.31E-04 7.86E-01 0.00E+00 1.04E-04 7.88E-01 248
Signal Boards D 175 8.30E+00 1.22E+01 8.57E+01 9.33E-04 8.10E-03 5.07E-03 1.06E-05 4.16E-04 9.40E-01 0.00E+00 8.42E-05 9.42E-01 296
Signal Boards D 250 1.75E+00 2.57E+00 2.97E+01 2.10E-04 2.56E-03 6.87E-04 3.69E-06 7.45E-05 3.28E-01 0.00E+00 1.89E-05 3.28E-01 103
Trenchers D 15 4.38E+00 7.43E+00 2.87E+00 3.66E-05 2.29E-04 1.92E-04 4.89E-07 8.93E-06 3.14E-02 0.00E+00 3.30E-06 3.15E-02 10
Trenchers D 25 4.62E+00 7.82E+00 1.17E+01 1.55E-04 9.81E-04 5.30E-04 1.63E-06 3.80E-05 1.29E-01 0.00E+00 1.40E-05 1.29E-01 41
Trenchers D 50 1.76E+02 3.04E+02 4.68E+02 2.38E-02 5.21E-02 6.20E-02 6.46E-05 5.36E-03 5.00E+00 0.00E+00 2.14E-03 5.04E+00 1,588
Trenchers D 120 2.38E+02 4.12E+02 1.23E+03 2.63E-02 1.62E-01 9.64E-02 1.57E-04 1.37E-02 1.34E+01 0.00E+00 2.38E-03 1.34E+01 4,234
Trenchers D 175 2.61E+01 4.51E+01 2.96E+02 4.40E-03 3.49E-02 1.94E-02 3.65E-05 1.91E-03 3.24E+00 0.00E+00 3.97E-04 3.25E+00 1,023
Trenchers D 250 2.34E+00 4.04E+00 4.09E+01 4.75E-04 4.54E-03 1.43E-03 5.07E-06 1.78E-04 4.50E-01 0.00E+00 4.29E-05 4.51E-01 142
Trenchers D 500 2.98E+00 5.15E+00 7.29E+01 7.69E-04 7.33E-03 3.35E-03 7.87E-06 2.85E-04 8.02E-01 0.00E+00 6.94E-05 8.03E-01 253
Trenchers D 750 4.07E-02 7.03E-02 1.88E+00 1.99E-05 1.92E-04 8.62E-05 2.07E-07 7.38E-06 2.06E-02 0.00E+00 1.80E-06 2.06E-02 6
Bore/Drill Rigs D 15 5.84E-01 1.30E+00 6.13E-01 7.82E-06 4.90E-05 4.10E-05 1.04E-07 1.90E-06 6.72E-03 0.00E+00 7.05E-07 6.73E-03 2
Bore/Drill Rigs D 25 1.75E+00 3.90E+00 2.84E+00 3.77E-05 2.39E-04 1.28E-04 3.95E-07 9.56E-06 3.11E-02 0.00E+00 3.40E-06 3.12E-02 10
Bore/Drill Rigs D 50 7.65E+00 1.77E+01 2.51E+01 2.55E-04 2.27E-03 2.02E-03 3.54E-06 1.06E-04 2.74E-01 0.00E+00 2.30E-05 2.74E-01 86
Bore/Drill Rigs D 120 2.35E+01 5.43E+01 1.90E+02 1.21E-03 1.24E-02 1.27E-02 2.45E-05 6.97E-04 2.09E+00 0.00E+00 1.09E-04 2.09E+00 659
Bore/Drill Rigs D 175 5.43E+00 1.26E+01 8.05E+01 4.41E-04 4.35E-03 4.73E-03 9.95E-06 1.89E-04 8.85E-01 0.00E+00 3.98E-05 8.86E-01 279
Construction Tons/Day MTons/Year
Equipment Fuel MaxHP Population Activity Consumption ROG Exhaust NOX Exhaust CO Exhaust SO2 Exhaust PM Exhaust CO2 Exhaust N2O Exhaust CH4 Exhaust CO2e CO2e
Bore/Drill Rigs D 250 4.67E+00 1.08E+01 9.18E+01 4.29E-04 4.12E-03 1.85E-03 1.14E-05 1.19E-04 1.01E+00 0.00E+00 3.87E-05 1.01E+00 318
Bore/Drill Rigs D 500 1.04E+01 2.40E+01 3.38E+02 1.55E-03 1.41E-02 6.62E-03 3.67E-05 4.34E-04 3.74E+00 0.00E+00 1.40E-04 3.74E+00 1,178
Bore/Drill Rigs D 750 6.30E-01 1.46E+00 4.05E+01 1.87E-04 1.70E-03 7.93E-04 4.50E-06 5.22E-05 4.47E-01 0.00E+00 1.68E-05 4.47E-01 141
Bore/Drill Rigs D 1000 1.06E+00 2.44E+00 1.02E+02 5.08E-04 7.27E-03 2.03E-03 1.14E-05 1.88E-04 1.13E+00 0.00E+00 4.58E-05 1.13E+00 356
Excavators D 25 2.16E+00 8.28E+00 6.19E+00 8.20E-05 5.18E-04 2.80E-04 8.62E-07 1.94E-05 6.80E-02 0.00E+00 7.40E-06 6.82E-02 21
Excavators D 50 8.14E+01 3.18E+02 3.69E+02 1.29E-02 3.90E-02 4.51E-02 5.13E-05 3.37E-03 3.97E+00 0.00E+00 1.17E-03 3.99E+00 1,257
Excavators D 120 2.21E+02 8.62E+02 2.91E+03 4.68E-02 2.92E-01 2.23E-01 3.72E-04 2.52E-02 3.17E+01 0.00E+00 4.22E-03 3.18E+01 10,007
Excavators D 175 4.26E+02 1.66E+03 8.52E+03 1.00E-01 7.42E-01 5.54E-01 1.05E-03 4.25E-02 9.33E+01 0.00E+00 9.05E-03 9.35E+01 29,430
Excavators D 250 1.73E+02 6.77E+02 4.86E+03 4.20E-02 3.84E-01 1.20E-01 6.04E-04 1.26E-02 5.36E+01 0.00E+00 3.79E-03 5.37E+01 16,898
Excavators D 500 1.25E+02 4.88E+02 5.17E+03 4.23E-02 3.60E-01 1.29E-01 5.59E-04 1.26E-02 5.70E+01 0.00E+00 3.82E-03 5.71E+01 17,968
Excavators D 750 3.18E-01 1.24E+00 2.18E+01 1.80E-04 1.56E-03 5.42E-04 2.42E-06 5.40E-05 2.40E-01 0.00E+00 1.62E-05 2.40E-01 76
Concrete/Industrial Saws D 25 2.34E-01 3.79E-01 2.84E-01 3.77E-06 2.38E-05 1.29E-05 3.96E-08 9.24E-07 3.12E-03 0.00E+00 3.40E-07 3.13E-03 1
Concrete/Industrial Saws D 50 2.04E+00 3.25E+00 4.55E+00 1.55E-04 4.64E-04 4.74E-04 6.35E-07 4.00E-05 4.91E-02 0.00E+00 1.40E-05 4.94E-02 16
Concrete/Industrial Saws D 120 3.56E+00 5.67E+00 1.92E+01 3.01E-04 2.03E-03 1.37E-03 2.46E-06 1.67E-04 2.10E-01 0.00E+00 2.72E-05 2.11E-01 66
Concrete/Industrial Saws D 175 1.17E-01 1.86E-01 1.36E+00 1.46E-05 1.26E-04 8.08E-05 1.67E-07 6.55E-06 1.49E-02 0.00E+00 1.31E-06 1.49E-02 5
Cement and Mortar Mixers D 15 2.99E+01 2.46E+01 7.08E+00 9.13E-05 5.76E-04 4.73E-04 1.21E-06 2.62E-05 7.75E-02 0.00E+00 8.24E-06 7.77E-02 24
Cement and Mortar Mixers D 25 2.69E+00 2.21E+00 1.77E+00 2.99E-05 1.67E-04 8.98E-05 2.46E-07 9.18E-06 1.94E-02 0.00E+00 2.70E-06 1.95E-02 6
Cranes D 50 1.99E+00 6.98E+00 7.55E+00 3.53E-04 8.34E-04 1.01E-03 1.04E-06 8.34E-05 8.08E-02 0.00E+00 3.19E-05 8.15E-02 26
Cranes D 120 2.18E+01 7.65E+01 1.76E+02 3.51E-03 2.11E-02 1.38E-02 2.25E-05 1.88E-03 1.92E+00 0.00E+00 3.17E-04 1.93E+00 606
Cranes D 175 2.18E+01 7.65E+01 2.81E+02 3.94E-03 2.97E-02 1.84E-02 3.46E-05 1.70E-03 3.07E+00 0.00E+00 3.56E-04 3.08E+00 969
Cranes D 250 4.22E+01 1.48E+02 7.55E+02 7.71E-03 7.37E-02 2.19E-02 9.35E-05 2.60E-03 8.31E+00 0.00E+00 6.96E-04 8.32E+00 2,621
Cranes D 500 1.55E+01 5.44E+01 4.44E+02 4.21E-03 3.87E-02 1.44E-02 4.80E-05 1.41E-03 4.89E+00 0.00E+00 3.80E-04 4.90E+00 1,542
Cranes D 750 1.32E+00 4.64E+00 6.38E+01 6.08E-04 5.69E-03 2.07E-03 7.06E-06 2.05E-04 7.03E-01 0.00E+00 5.49E-05 7.04E-01 222
Cranes D 9999 1.66E+00 5.82E+00 2.57E+02 2.76E-03 3.01E-02 9.70E-03 2.84E-05 9.28E-04 2.82E+00 0.00E+00 2.49E-04 2.83E+00 889
Graders D 50 8.18E-01 2.13E+00 2.73E+00 1.15E-04 2.95E-04 3.47E-04 3.79E-07 2.79E-05 2.93E-02 0.00E+00 1.04E-05 2.95E-02 9
Graders D 120 5.46E+01 1.42E+02 4.88E+02 8.90E-03 5.49E-02 3.77E-02 6.25E-05 4.80E-03 5.33E+00 0.00E+00 8.03E-04 5.35E+00 1,683
Graders D 175 1.86E+02 4.86E+02 2.75E+03 3.56E-02 2.72E-01 1.78E-01 3.39E-04 1.53E-02 3.01E+01 0.00E+00 3.21E-03 3.02E+01 9,496
Graders D 250 1.16E+02 3.02E+02 2.35E+03 2.25E-02 2.14E-01 6.53E-02 2.92E-04 7.44E-03 2.59E+01 0.00E+00 2.03E-03 2.59E+01 8,167
Graders D 500 3.27E+00 8.53E+00 8.87E+01 7.90E-04 7.17E-03 2.68E-03 9.60E-06 2.59E-04 9.78E-01 0.00E+00 7.13E-05 9.79E-01 308
Graders D 750 2.03E-02 5.30E-02 1.17E+00 1.05E-05 9.67E-05 3.52E-05 1.29E-07 3.45E-06 1.29E-02 0.00E+00 9.43E-07 1.29E-02 4
Off-Highway Trucks D 175 3.80E+00 2.07E+01 1.18E+02 1.49E-03 1.07E-02 7.85E-03 1.46E-05 6.23E-04 1.29E+00 0.00E+00 1.34E-04 1.29E+00 407
Off-Highway Trucks D 250 2.80E+01 1.53E+02 1.15E+03 1.07E-02 9.45E-02 2.93E-02 1.43E-04 3.15E-03 1.27E+01 0.00E+00 9.65E-04 1.27E+01 4,004
Off-Highway Trucks D 500 3.95E+01 2.15E+02 2.66E+03 2.34E-02 1.92E-01 6.85E-02 2.88E-04 6.82E-03 2.93E+01 0.00E+00 2.11E-03 2.93E+01 9,237
Off-Highway Trucks D 750 4.26E+00 2.33E+01 4.65E+02 4.11E-03 3.46E-02 1.20E-02 5.16E-05 1.21E-03 5.13E+00 0.00E+00 3.71E-04 5.14E+00 1,617
Off-Highway Trucks D 1000 2.00E+00 1.09E+01 3.09E+02 2.98E-03 3.25E-02 9.10E-03 3.42E-05 9.77E-04 3.40E+00 0.00E+00 2.69E-04 3.41E+00 1,072
Crushing/Proc. Equipment D 50 9.35E+00 2.45E+01 5.01E+01 2.13E-03 5.33E-03 6.12E-03 6.96E-06 5.16E-04 5.38E-01 0.00E+00 1.92E-04 5.42E-01 171
Crushing/Proc. Equipment D 120 2.64E+01 6.90E+01 2.63E+02 4.83E-03 2.95E-02 1.99E-02 3.36E-05 2.68E-03 2.87E+00 0.00E+00 4.36E-04 2.88E+00 906
Crushing/Proc. Equipment D 175 1.12E+01 2.92E+01 2.23E+02 2.83E-03 2.22E-02 1.40E-02 2.75E-05 1.26E-03 2.44E+00 0.00E+00 2.56E-04 2.45E+00 770
Crushing/Proc. Equipment D 250 1.11E+00 2.91E+00 3.22E+01 2.68E-04 2.93E-03 7.88E-04 4.00E-06 9.01E-05 3.55E-01 0.00E+00 2.42E-05 3.56E-01 112
Crushing/Proc. Equipment D 500 6.25E+00 1.64E+01 2.77E+02 2.13E-03 2.22E-02 6.94E-03 3.00E-05 7.23E-04 3.06E+00 0.00E+00 1.92E-04 3.06E+00 965
Crushing/Proc. Equipment D 750 3.39E-02 8.87E-02 2.37E+00 1.83E-05 1.97E-04 5.85E-05 2.62E-07 6.27E-06 2.61E-02 0.00E+00 1.66E-06 2.61E-02 8
Crushing/Proc. Equipment D 9999 3.39E-02 8.87E-02 5.26E+00 4.99E-05 5.90E-04 1.63E-04 5.83E-07 1.72E-05 5.80E-02 0.00E+00 4.51E-06 5.81E-02 18
Rough Terrain Forklifts D 50 6.49E+00 2.01E+01 3.17E+01 1.19E-03 3.34E-03 3.80E-03 4.41E-06 3.02E-04 3.41E-01 0.00E+00 1.07E-04 3.43E-01 108
Rough Terrain Forklifts D 120 3.11E+02 9.65E+02 2.76E+03 4.60E-02 2.89E-01 2.09E-01 3.53E-04 2.55E-02 3.01E+01 0.00E+00 4.15E-03 3.02E+01 9,503
Rough Terrain Forklifts D 175 3.98E+01 1.24E+02 7.04E+02 8.34E-03 6.45E-02 4.48E-02 8.68E-05 3.65E-03 7.71E+00 0.00E+00 7.52E-04 7.73E+00 2,432
Rough Terrain Forklifts D 250 2.22E+00 6.90E+00 5.33E+01 4.46E-04 4.46E-03 1.31E-03 6.62E-06 1.43E-04 5.88E-01 0.00E+00 4.02E-05 5.89E-01 185
Rough Terrain Forklifts D 500 1.46E+00 4.54E+00 5.27E+01 4.13E-04 3.87E-03 1.30E-03 5.71E-06 1.32E-04 5.82E-01 0.00E+00 3.73E-05 5.83E-01 183
Rubber Tired Loaders D 25 8.18E-01 2.15E+00 1.65E+00 2.19E-05 1.39E-04 7.47E-05 2.30E-07 5.37E-06 1.82E-02 0.00E+00 1.98E-06 1.82E-02 6
Rubber Tired Loaders D 50 1.59E+01 4.25E+01 6.16E+01 2.54E-03 6.62E-03 7.73E-03 8.55E-06 6.20E-04 6.61E-01 0.00E+00 2.30E-04 6.66E-01 210
Rubber Tired Loaders D 120 4.32E+02 1.16E+03 3.12E+03 5.60E-02 3.47E-01 2.40E-01 3.99E-04 3.03E-02 3.40E+01 0.00E+00 5.05E-03 3.41E+01 10,736
Rubber Tired Loaders D 175 2.44E+02 6.51E+02 3.16E+03 4.02E-02 3.09E-01 2.04E-01 3.89E-04 1.74E-02 3.46E+01 0.00E+00 3.63E-03 3.47E+01 10,916
Rubber Tired Loaders D 250 2.42E+02 6.48E+02 4.37E+03 4.07E-02 3.92E-01 1.19E-01 5.42E-04 1.35E-02 4.82E+01 0.00E+00 3.67E-03 4.83E+01 15,197
Rubber Tired Loaders D 500 1.01E+02 2.70E+02 2.90E+03 2.51E-02 2.31E-01 8.62E-02 3.13E-04 8.26E-03 3.19E+01 0.00E+00 2.27E-03 3.19E+01 10,057
Rubber Tired Loaders D 750 8.20E-01 2.19E+00 4.82E+01 4.21E-04 3.95E-03 1.44E-03 5.35E-06 1.40E-04 5.32E-01 0.00E+00 3.80E-05 5.33E-01 168
Construction Tons/Day MTons/Year
Equipment Fuel MaxHP Population Activity Consumption ROG Exhaust NOX Exhaust CO Exhaust SO2 Exhaust PM Exhaust CO2 Exhaust N2O Exhaust CH4 Exhaust CO2e CO2e
Rubber Tired Loaders D 1000 8.81E-02 2.35E-01 6.34E+00 6.10E-05 7.01E-04 2.17E-04 7.02E-07 2.11E-05 6.98E-02 0.00E+00 5.50E-06 6.99E-02 22
Rubber Tired Dozers D 175 5.84E-01 2.61E+00 1.54E+01 2.76E-04 2.03E-03 1.10E-03 1.90E-06 1.16E-04 1.69E-01 0.00E+00 2.49E-05 1.70E-01 53
Rubber Tired Dozers D 250 1.43E+01 6.39E+01 5.33E+02 7.77E-03 6.64E-02 2.18E-02 6.59E-05 2.81E-03 5.86E+00 0.00E+00 7.02E-04 5.87E+00 1,849
Rubber Tired Dozers D 500 2.20E+01 9.83E+01 1.19E+03 1.58E-02 1.34E-01 6.99E-02 1.28E-04 5.57E-03 1.30E+01 0.00E+00 1.42E-03 1.30E+01 4,102
Rubber Tired Dozers D 750 9.01E-01 4.02E+00 7.31E+01 9.75E-04 8.39E-03 4.31E-03 8.06E-06 3.46E-04 8.01E-01 0.00E+00 8.80E-05 8.03E-01 253
Rubber Tired Dozers D 1000 6.10E-02 2.72E-01 7.34E+00 1.02E-04 1.01E-03 4.69E-04 8.08E-07 3.53E-05 8.04E-02 0.00E+00 9.21E-06 8.06E-02 25
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes D 25 1.65E+01 4.26E+01 3.07E+01 4.15E-04 2.63E-03 1.40E-03 4.28E-06 1.20E-04 3.37E-01 0.00E+00 3.74E-05 3.38E-01 106
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes D 50 9.85E+01 2.61E+02 3.67E+02 1.16E-02 3.77E-02 4.17E-02 5.12E-05 3.11E-03 3.96E+00 0.00E+00 1.05E-03 3.98E+00 1,254
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes D 120 1.32E+03 3.49E+03 8.26E+03 1.21E-01 7.96E-01 6.15E-01 1.06E-03 6.67E-02 9.02E+01 0.00E+00 1.09E-02 9.04E+01 28,466
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes D 175 9.83E+01 2.61E+02 1.20E+03 1.28E-02 1.00E-01 7.63E-02 1.49E-04 5.56E-03 1.32E+01 0.00E+00 1.16E-03 1.32E+01 4,163
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes D 250 3.18E+01 8.43E+01 6.55E+02 5.07E-03 4.91E-02 1.54E-02 8.14E-05 1.56E-03 7.23E+00 0.00E+00 4.57E-04 7.24E+00 2,279
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes D 500 5.13E+01 1.36E+02 2.12E+03 1.56E-02 1.40E-01 5.06E-02 2.64E-04 4.76E-03 2.34E+01 0.00E+00 1.40E-03 2.34E+01 7,375
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes D 750 4.10E+00 1.09E+01 2.55E+02 1.88E-03 1.73E-02 6.06E-03 3.16E-05 5.80E-04 2.81E+00 0.00E+00 1.69E-04 2.81E+00 886
Crawler Tractors D 50 8.18E-01 2.35E+00 2.73E+00 1.38E-04 3.08E-04 3.81E-04 3.77E-07 3.17E-05 2.92E-02 0.00E+00 1.24E-05 2.95E-02 9
Crawler Tractors D 120 4.64E+02 1.33E+03 4.02E+03 8.60E-02 5.11E-01 3.23E-01 5.14E-04 4.50E-02 4.38E+01 0.00E+00 7.76E-03 4.40E+01 13,839
Crawler Tractors D 175 1.57E+02 4.51E+02 2.49E+03 3.77E-02 2.82E-01 1.68E-01 3.07E-04 1.60E-02 2.73E+01 0.00E+00 3.40E-03 2.74E+01 8,616
Crawler Tractors D 250 1.35E+02 3.87E+02 2.92E+03 3.41E-02 3.08E-01 9.68E-02 3.62E-04 1.19E-02 3.21E+01 0.00E+00 3.08E-03 3.22E+01 10,125
Crawler Tractors D 500 9.25E+01 2.65E+02 3.13E+03 3.37E-02 2.97E-01 1.26E-01 3.37E-04 1.15E-02 3.44E+01 0.00E+00 3.04E-03 3.45E+01 10,849
Crawler Tractors D 750 5.42E-01 1.56E+00 3.28E+01 3.56E-04 3.18E-03 1.32E-03 3.63E-06 1.22E-04 3.61E-01 0.00E+00 3.21E-05 3.62E-01 114
Crawler Tractors D 1000 5.42E-01 1.55E+00 4.65E+01 5.36E-04 5.72E-03 2.10E-03 5.14E-06 1.83E-04 5.11E-01 0.00E+00 4.84E-05 5.12E-01 161
Skid Steer Loaders D 25 1.12E+02 2.57E+02 1.61E+02 2.59E-03 1.49E-02 7.95E-03 2.24E-05 8.05E-04 1.77E+00 0.00E+00 2.33E-04 1.77E+00 559
Skid Steer Loaders D 50 1.02E+03 2.37E+03 2.78E+03 6.11E-02 2.70E-01 2.68E-01 3.91E-04 1.86E-02 3.02E+01 0.00E+00 5.52E-03 3.03E+01 9,543
Skid Steer Loaders D 120 5.33E+02 1.24E+03 2.42E+03 2.66E-02 2.03E-01 1.70E-01 3.11E-04 1.52E-02 2.65E+01 0.00E+00 2.40E-03 2.66E+01 8,358
Off-Highway Tractors D 120 5.84E-02 1.79E-01 7.70E-01 1.89E-05 1.10E-04 6.42E-05 9.82E-08 9.62E-06 8.37E-03 0.00E+00 1.70E-06 8.41E-03 3
Off-Highway Tractors D 175 7.15E+01 2.19E+02 1.30E+03 2.23E-02 1.68E-01 9.11E-02 1.60E-04 9.51E-03 1.42E+01 0.00E+00 2.02E-03 1.42E+01 4,483
Off-Highway Tractors D 250 6.75E+01 2.07E+02 1.23E+03 1.70E-02 1.49E-01 4.85E-02 1.52E-04 6.21E-03 1.35E+01 0.00E+00 1.53E-03 1.35E+01 4,260
Off-Highway Tractors D 750 3.40E+00 1.04E+01 2.69E+02 3.41E-03 3.02E-02 1.51E-02 2.97E-05 1.23E-03 2.95E+00 0.00E+00 3.07E-04 2.96E+00 931
Off-Highway Tractors D 1000 3.59E-01 1.10E+00 4.08E+01 5.40E-04 5.52E-03 2.48E-03 4.49E-06 1.89E-04 4.47E-01 0.00E+00 4.87E-05 4.48E-01 141
Dumpers/Tenders D 25 1.40E+00 2.55E+00 8.83E-01 1.23E-05 7.64E-05 4.07E-05 1.23E-07 3.69E-06 9.70E-03 0.00E+00 1.11E-06 9.72E-03 3
Other Construction Equipment D 15 1.93E+01 3.66E+01 1.69E+01 2.15E-04 1.35E-03 1.13E-03 2.87E-06 5.23E-05 1.85E-01 0.00E+00 1.94E-05 1.85E-01 58
Other Construction Equipment D 25 3.27E+00 6.19E+00 3.72E+00 4.94E-05 3.13E-04 1.68E-04 5.19E-07 1.25E-05 4.09E-02 0.00E+00 4.46E-06 4.10E-02 13
Other Construction Equipment D 50 5.02E+00 9.68E+00 1.25E+01 3.64E-04 1.25E-03 1.28E-03 1.75E-06 9.90E-05 1.35E-01 0.00E+00 3.28E-05 1.36E-01 43
Other Construction Equipment D 120 8.30E+00 1.60E+01 5.90E+01 8.02E-04 5.61E-03 4.21E-03 7.57E-06 4.52E-04 6.46E-01 0.00E+00 7.24E-05 6.48E-01 204
Other Construction Equipment D 175 1.15E+01 2.21E+01 1.07E+02 1.03E-03 8.82E-03 6.47E-03 1.32E-05 4.62E-04 1.17E+00 0.00E+00 9.29E-05 1.17E+00 369
Other Construction Equipment D 500 2.66E+01 5.12E+01 5.89E+02 3.71E-03 3.88E-02 1.34E-02 6.38E-05 1.26E-03 6.50E+00 0.00E+00 3.35E-04 6.51E+00 2,048
13,766 26,712 101,720 1.439 9.606 9.497 0.012 0.601 1,105.878 0.007 0.126 1,111 349,642
Population Activity Consumption lbs/day Tons/Day MTons/Year
443 860 3,276 93 619 612 1 39 36 0 0 36 11,261
As a percent of Total Building Permits issued. Percent 3.22%
SOURCE: U.S. Census Bureau. http://censtats.census.gov/cgi-bin/bldgprmt/bldgdisp.pl
Buildings Estimates with Imputation
Santa Clara Cupertino
2008 3,471 86 2.5%
2009 643 21 3.3%
2010 904 24 2.7%
2011 1,029 51 5.0%
2012 1,564 43 2.7%
avg 1,522 45 3.2%
Annual GHG emissions (MTons/Year) multiplied by 347 days/year to account for reduced/limited construction activity on weekends and holidays. This assumption is consistent with the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) methodology for
transportation within the Climate Change Scoping Plan Measure Documentation Supplement.
Lawn & Garden Tons/Day MTons/Year
Equipment Fuel MaxHP Population Activity Consumption ROG Exhaust NOX Exhaust CO Exhaust SO2 Exhaust PM Exhaust CO2 Exhaust N2O Exhaust CH4 Exhaust CO2e CO2e
Lawn Mowers G2 15 2.19E+03 1.37E+03 1.55E+02 1.75E-02 4.65E-03 3.15E-01 3.84E-05 2.94E-03 9.34E-01 1.21E-03 1.09E-03 1.33E+00 441
Lawn Mowers G2 15 1.64E+04 6.97E+02 9.95E+01 2.28E-02 2.58E-03 2.53E-01 1.96E-05 1.68E-03 4.75E-01 6.14E-04 1.42E-03 6.95E-01 230
Chainsaws G2 2 3.92E+03 3.10E+03 1.85E+02 1.55E-01 2.43E-03 2.80E-01 3.12E-05 4.40E-04 7.57E-01 1.25E-03 9.62E-03 1.35E+00 446
Chainsaws G2 2 4.41E+04 5.91E+02 3.32E+01 1.77E-02 4.83E-04 6.93E-02 5.94E-06 3.19E-04 1.44E-01 2.42E-04 1.10E-03 2.42E-01 80
Chainsaws G2 15 2.76E+03 2.19E+03 3.15E+02 2.64E-01 4.14E-03 4.77E-01 5.31E-05 7.50E-04 1.29E+00 1.42E-03 1.64E-02 2.07E+00 687
Chainsaws G2 15 3.10E+04 4.17E+02 5.41E+01 2.71E-02 8.07E-04 1.10E-01 1.01E-05 6.00E-04 2.46E-01 2.70E-04 1.69E-03 3.65E-01 121
Chainsaws Preempt G2 15 3.43E+03 2.72E+03 3.92E+02 3.28E-01 5.15E-03 5.93E-01 6.61E-05 9.34E-04 1.60E+00 1.76E-03 2.04E-02 2.57E+00 852
Chainsaws Preempt G2 15 3.86E+04 5.19E+02 7.57E+01 4.45E-02 8.35E-04 1.63E-01 1.26E-05 4.10E-04 3.06E-01 3.06E-04 2.76E-03 4.59E-01 152
Trimmers/Edgers/Brush Cutters G2 2 1.28E+04 4.25E+03 1.88E+02 1.02E-01 2.90E-03 3.35E-01 3.73E-05 5.27E-04 9.05E-01 1.60E-03 6.32E-03 1.53E+00 508
Trimmers/Edgers/Brush Cutters G2 2 1.42E+05 8.38E+03 3.56E+02 1.61E-01 5.87E-03 6.61E-01 7.35E-05 1.04E-03 1.79E+00 3.19E-03 1.00E-02 2.99E+00 990
Leaf Blowers/Vacuums G2 2 1.91E+04 1.03E+04 5.47E+02 3.78E-01 7.80E-03 8.98E-01 1.00E-04 1.41E-03 2.43E+00 4.08E-03 2.35E-02 4.19E+00 1,387
Leaf Blowers/Vacuums G2 2 4.92E+04 6.46E+02 3.52E+01 1.87E-02 5.12E-04 7.36E-02 6.30E-06 3.39E-04 1.53E-01 2.61E-04 1.16E-03 2.58E-01 86
Shredders G2 15 9.64E+01 3.58E+01 1.57E+01 8.84E-04 6.83E-04 4.26E-02 3.35E-06 6.82E-04 8.14E-02 7.94E-05 5.49E-05 1.07E-01 35
Shredders G2 15 3.43E+03 8.46E+00 4.22E+00 9.70E-04 1.24E-04 1.14E-02 7.92E-07 1.61E-04 1.92E-02 1.60E-05 6.03E-05 2.54E-02 8
Commercial Turf Equipment G2 15 5.11E+01 1.12E+02 4.59E+01 2.09E-03 1.57E-03 1.25E-01 9.83E-06 1.11E-04 2.39E-01 2.11E-04 1.30E-04 3.07E-01 102
Commercial Turf Equipment G2 25 2.52E+01 5.53E+01 4.91E+01 2.16E-03 1.65E-03 1.38E-01 1.02E-05 1.16E-04 2.49E-01 1.56E-04 1.34E-04 3.00E-01 99
Other Lawn & Garden Equipment G2 2 2.16E+01 4.06E+00 2.27E-01 1.11E-04 3.58E-06 4.12E-04 4.59E-08 6.49E-07 1.11E-03 1.75E-06 6.92E-06 1.80E-03 1
Other Lawn & Garden Equipment G2 2 6.62E+02 7.80E+00 4.91E-01 2.58E-04 7.17E-06 1.03E-03 8.82E-08 4.74E-06 2.14E-03 3.41E-06 1.60E-05 3.53E-03 1
Other Lawn & Garden Equipment G2 15 9.40E+00 1.77E+00 4.93E-01 2.42E-04 7.78E-06 8.97E-04 9.98E-08 1.41E-06 2.42E-03 1.79E-06 1.51E-05 3.29E-03 1
Other Lawn & Garden Equipment G2 15 2.88E+02 3.39E+00 1.02E+00 5.06E-04 1.53E-05 2.09E-03 1.92E-07 1.14E-05 4.66E-03 3.45E-06 3.14E-05 6.39E-03 2
Lawn Mowers G4 5 1.30E+04 8.11E+03 9.74E+02 1.17E-01 2.93E-02 2.18E+00 1.91E-04 1.74E-02 5.53E+00 7.17E-03 6.45E-03 7.89E+00 2,612
Lawn Mowers G4 5 2.05E+05 8.72E+03 1.22E+03 1.24E-01 3.37E-02 3.43E+00 2.05E-04 1.42E-02 5.94E+00 7.67E-03 6.85E-03 8.46E+00 2,802
Tillers G4 5 1.34E+03 2.06E+02 2.94E+01 2.65E-03 6.58E-04 7.48E-02 5.38E-06 4.11E-04 1.56E-01 1.69E-04 1.47E-04 2.11E-01 70
Tillers G4 5 5.22E+03 2.57E+02 4.00E+01 4.39E-03 1.13E-03 1.11E-01 6.73E-06 4.86E-04 1.95E-01 2.43E-04 2.43E-04 2.75E-01 91
Trimmers/Edgers/Brush Cutters G4 5 2.36E+03 8.79E+02 2.72E+01 3.57E-03 1.58E-03 6.28E-02 5.17E-06 4.88E-05 1.50E-01 5.35E-04 1.98E-04 3.20E-01 106
Trimmers/Edgers/Brush Cutters G4 5 1.10E+04 6.49E+02 2.34E+01 3.43E-03 9.85E-04 6.49E-02 3.82E-06 1.64E-04 1.11E-01 3.60E-04 1.90E-04 2.27E-01 75
Leaf Blowers/Vacuums G4 5 6.02E+02 1.02E+02 6.84E+00 5.11E-04 1.25E-04 1.85E-02 1.21E-06 8.19E-05 3.49E-02 5.06E-05 2.83E-05 5.12E-02 17
Leaf Blowers/Vacuums G4 5 5.18E+02 6.81E+00 5.25E-01 5.04E-05 1.14E-05 1.63E-03 8.01E-08 4.63E-06 2.32E-03 3.88E-06 2.79E-06 3.58E-03 1
Rear Engine Riding Mowers G4 15 7.09E+03 5.27E+03 1.76E+03 8.27E-02 5.87E-02 5.19E+00 2.43E-04 3.96E-03 8.53E+00 8.50E-03 4.58E-03 1.13E+01 3,729
Rear Engine Riding Mowers G4 15 6.22E+03 4.80E+02 1.62E+02 8.23E-03 5.40E-03 4.80E-01 2.22E-05 3.10E-04 7.78E-01 7.71E-04 4.56E-04 1.03E+00 340
Rear Engine Riding Mowers G4 25 3.24E+01 2.41E+01 1.57E+01 7.09E-04 5.12E-04 4.76E-02 1.87E-06 3.42E-05 7.37E-02 5.48E-05 3.93E-05 9.15E-02 30
Rear Engine Riding Mowers G4 25 2.80E+01 2.16E+00 1.41E+00 7.11E-05 4.29E-05 4.31E-03 1.67E-07 2.63E-06 6.61E-03 4.70E-06 3.94E-06 8.15E-03 3
Front Mowers G4 15 3.25E+02 2.42E+02 1.29E+02 6.05E-03 4.29E-03 3.80E-01 1.78E-05 2.90E-04 6.24E-01 5.00E-04 3.35E-04 7.86E-01 260
Front Mowers G4 15 1.05E+04 8.12E+02 4.37E+02 2.22E-02 1.46E-02 1.30E+00 5.98E-05 8.36E-04 2.10E+00 1.67E-03 1.23E-03 2.64E+00 875
Front Mowers G4 25 2.55E+02 1.89E+02 1.36E+02 6.15E-03 4.45E-03 4.13E-01 1.62E-05 2.97E-04 6.40E-01 4.54E-04 3.41E-04 7.88E-01 261
Front Mowers G4 25 8.23E+03 6.36E+02 4.60E+02 2.31E-02 1.40E-02 1.40E+00 5.45E-05 8.57E-04 2.15E+00 1.46E-03 1.28E-03 2.63E+00 871
Shredders G4 5 2.55E+02 9.49E+01 2.61E+01 3.43E-03 1.52E-03 6.03E-02 4.96E-06 4.69E-05 1.44E-01 1.85E-04 1.90E-04 2.05E-01 68
Shredders G4 5 9.49E+03 2.34E+01 8.17E+00 7.77E-04 2.38E-04 2.57E-02 1.22E-06 7.57E-05 3.54E-02 3.59E-05 4.30E-05 4.74E-02 16
Lawn & Garden Tractors G4 15 1.30E+03 4.58E+02 2.94E+02 1.16E-02 8.33E-03 8.70E-01 4.08E-05 5.62E-04 1.43E+00 9.59E-04 6.42E-04 1.74E+00 576
Lawn & Garden Tractors G4 15 8.44E+03 3.38E+02 2.19E+02 9.88E-03 6.75E-03 6.49E-01 3.01E-05 3.84E-04 1.06E+00 7.38E-04 5.47E-04 1.30E+00 431
Lawn & Garden Tractors G4 25 5.13E+02 1.81E+02 1.85E+02 7.20E-03 4.93E-03 5.62E-01 2.21E-05 3.42E-04 8.72E-01 4.70E-04 3.98E-04 1.03E+00 340
Lawn & Garden Tractors G4 25 3.33E+03 1.33E+02 1.37E+02 6.20E-03 3.82E-03 4.19E-01 1.63E-05 2.34E-04 6.43E-01 3.53E-04 3.43E-04 7.60E-01 252
Lawn & Garden Tractors G4 50 7.42E+00 2.11E+00 3.28E+00 6.58E-05 1.27E-04 2.57E-03 3.33E-07 2.10E-06 2.74E-02 7.79E-06 3.64E-06 2.99E-02 10
Wood Splitters G4 5 4.37E+02 1.54E+02 4.55E+01 4.86E-03 1.21E-03 1.08E-01 8.67E-06 7.37E-04 2.51E-01 2.05E-04 2.69E-04 3.20E-01 106
Wood Splitters G4 5 1.09E+04 3.29E+01 1.22E+01 9.61E-04 2.46E-04 3.83E-02 1.85E-06 9.59E-05 5.37E-02 4.16E-05 5.32E-05 6.77E-02 22
Chippers/Stump Grinders G4 15 6.16E+00 2.13E+01 1.82E+01 1.45E-03 1.05E-03 5.34E-02 2.46E-06 7.24E-04 8.64E-02 7.56E-05 7.91E-05 1.11E-01 37
Chippers/Stump Grinders G4 15 1.10E+01 4.97E-01 4.47E-01 3.40E-05 1.66E-05 1.38E-03 5.75E-08 1.53E-05 2.02E-03 1.44E-06 1.88E-06 2.51E-03 1
Chippers/Stump Grinders G4 25 3.50E+01 1.21E+02 1.75E+02 1.42E-02 9.02E-03 5.27E-01 2.04E-05 6.73E-03 8.03E-01 5.35E-04 7.76E-04 9.85E-01 326
Chippers/Stump Grinders G4 25 6.22E+01 2.81E+00 4.20E+00 3.03E-04 1.39E-04 1.32E-02 4.74E-07 1.42E-04 1.87E-02 1.00E-05 1.68E-05 2.22E-02 7
Commercial Turf Equipment G4 15 4.60E+02 1.01E+03 5.46E+02 3.14E-02 2.20E-02 1.61E+00 7.49E-05 1.47E-03 2.63E+00 2.32E-03 1.73E-03 3.39E+00 1,121
Commercial Turf Equipment G4 25 2.27E+02 4.97E+02 4.78E+02 2.60E-02 1.95E-02 1.45E+00 5.66E-05 1.25E-03 2.23E+00 1.57E-03 1.43E-03 2.75E+00 910
Commercial Turf Equipment G4 50 9.14E+01 1.84E+02 3.06E+02 8.85E-03 1.34E-02 4.46E-01 2.70E-05 1.70E-04 2.22E+00 7.74E-04 4.89E-04 2.47E+00 818
Commercial Turf Equipment G4 120 6.05E-01 1.21E+00 2.97E+00 1.36E-05 8.00E-05 7.42E-04 2.65E-07 2.13E-06 2.75E-02 5.05E-06 7.52E-07 2.91E-02 10
Other Lawn & Garden Equipment G4 5 4.04E+02 7.59E+01 1.57E+01 1.41E-03 3.48E-04 4.02E-02 2.88E-06 2.19E-04 8.34E-02 7.58E-05 7.81E-05 1.09E-01 36
Other Lawn & Garden Equipment G4 5 1.24E+04 1.46E+02 3.63E+01 3.40E-03 7.82E-04 1.13E-01 5.53E-06 3.15E-04 1.60E-01 1.55E-04 1.88E-04 2.12E-01 70
Other Lawn & Garden Equipment G4 15 1.79E+02 3.37E+01 1.52E+01 6.08E-04 4.36E-04 4.50E-02 2.11E-06 2.94E-05 7.41E-02 5.89E-05 3.37E-05 9.31E-02 31
Lawn & Garden Tons/Day MTons/Year
Equipment Fuel MaxHP Population Activity Consumption ROG Exhaust NOX Exhaust CO Exhaust SO2 Exhaust PM Exhaust CO2 Exhaust N2O Exhaust CH4 Exhaust CO2e CO2e
Other Lawn & Garden Equipment G4 15 5.50E+03 6.48E+01 3.06E+01 1.56E-03 9.43E-04 9.33E-02 4.06E-06 4.91E-05 1.42E-01 1.20E-04 8.66E-05 1.81E-01 60
Other Lawn & Garden Equipment G4 25 3.79E+00 7.13E-01 7.05E-01 2.77E-05 1.91E-05 2.15E-03 8.43E-08 1.32E-06 3.33E-03 1.83E-06 1.54E-06 3.93E-03 1
Other Lawn & Garden Equipment G4 25 1.17E+02 1.38E+00 1.41E+00 7.07E-05 3.85E-05 4.41E-03 1.63E-07 2.22E-06 6.43E-03 3.61E-06 3.91E-06 7.63E-03 3
Other Lawn & Garden Equipment G4 50 2.75E-01 4.59E-02 9.90E-02 2.18E-06 4.32E-06 7.57E-05 1.01E-08 6.34E-08 8.28E-04 2.14E-07 1.21E-07 8.97E-04 0
Other Lawn & Garden Equipment G4 120 6.59E-01 1.10E-01 6.12E-01 9.04E-06 4.06E-05 1.94E-04 5.38E-08 4.31E-07 5.57E-03 1.05E-06 5.01E-07 5.91E-03 2
Leaf Blowers/Vacuums D 15 4.40E-01 1.45E-01 1.98E-02 2.27E-07 1.60E-06 1.33E-06 3.38E-09 6.75E-08 2.17E-04 0.00E+00 2.05E-08 2.17E-04 0
Leaf Blowers/Vacuums D 120 3.85E-01 1.26E-01 2.81E-01 3.51E-06 2.73E-05 1.82E-05 3.61E-08 1.85E-06 3.07E-03 0.00E+00 3.16E-07 3.08E-03 1
Leaf Blowers/Vacuums D 250 1.10E-01 3.61E-02 1.64E-01 8.97E-07 1.29E-05 3.56E-06 2.04E-08 3.37E-07 1.81E-03 0.00E+00 8.09E-08 1.81E-03 1
Lawn & Garden Tractors D 15 1.06E+03 1.58E+03 6.70E+02 7.76E-03 5.46E-02 4.48E-02 1.14E-04 2.49E-03 7.34E+00 0.00E+00 7.00E-04 7.35E+00 2,435
Lawn & Garden Tractors D 25 8.30E+02 1.24E+03 8.05E+02 1.07E-02 6.83E-02 3.64E-02 1.12E-04 2.94E-03 8.83E+00 0.00E+00 9.68E-04 8.85E+00 2,931
Chippers/Stump Grinders D 25 4.95E-01 6.30E-01 5.77E-01 7.65E-06 4.84E-05 2.61E-05 8.04E-08 1.88E-06 6.34E-03 0.00E+00 6.90E-07 6.35E-03 2
Chippers/Stump Grinders D 120 1.36E+01 1.74E+01 6.03E+01 9.31E-04 6.34E-03 4.23E-03 7.73E-06 5.09E-04 6.59E-01 0.00E+00 8.40E-05 6.61E-01 219
Chippers/Stump Grinders D 175 9.34E-01 1.19E+00 7.14E+00 7.52E-05 6.68E-04 4.18E-04 8.82E-07 3.36E-05 7.84E-02 0.00E+00 6.78E-06 7.85E-02 26
Chippers/Stump Grinders D 250 2.20E-01 2.80E-01 2.82E+00 1.99E-05 2.41E-04 6.72E-05 3.50E-07 7.26E-06 3.11E-02 0.00E+00 1.80E-06 3.11E-02 10
Chippers/Stump Grinders D 500 2.03E+00 2.59E+00 2.90E+01 1.86E-04 2.24E-03 7.18E-04 3.14E-06 6.96E-05 3.20E-01 0.00E+00 1.68E-05 3.20E-01 106
Chippers/Stump Grinders D 750 2.31E+00 2.94E+00 7.92E+01 5.20E-04 6.28E-03 1.96E-03 8.79E-06 1.93E-04 8.74E-01 0.00E+00 4.69E-05 8.75E-01 290
Chippers/Stump Grinders D 1000 4.40E+00 5.59E+00 2.15E+02 1.79E-03 2.31E-02 6.51E-03 2.38E-05 6.49E-04 2.37E+00 0.00E+00 1.62E-04 2.37E+00 786
Commercial Turf Equipment D 15 2.67E+01 7.81E+01 3.44E+01 3.91E-04 2.75E-03 2.30E-03 5.86E-06 1.08E-04 3.77E-01 0.00E+00 3.53E-05 3.78E-01 125
Commercial Turf Equipment D 25 5.02E+02 1.47E+03 9.68E+02 1.28E-02 8.10E-02 4.38E-02 1.35E-04 3.04E-03 1.06E+01 0.00E+00 1.16E-03 1.06E+01 3,518
Other Lawn & Garden Equipment D 15 3.85E-01 4.56E-01 2.54E-01 2.89E-06 2.03E-05 1.70E-05 4.34E-08 8.26E-07 2.79E-03 0.00E+00 2.61E-07 2.80E-03 1
Other Lawn & Garden Equipment D 25 5.50E-02 6.52E-02 4.83E-02 6.41E-07 4.05E-06 2.19E-06 6.73E-09 1.57E-07 5.31E-04 0.00E+00 5.78E-08 5.32E-04 0
698,419 69,971 13,409 2.118 0.552 26.984 0.002 0.076 83.154 0.055 0.129 102.909 34,076
Population Activity Consumption lbs/day Tons/Day MTons/Year
22,769 2,281 437 138 36 1,759 0 5 3 0 0 3 1,111
As a percent of 2010 Total Population Santa Clara 1,788,393 Cupertino 58,302 Percent 3%
SOURCE: U.S. Census Bureau. 2010.
Light Commercial Tons/Day MTons/Year
Equipment Fuel MaxHP Population Activity Consumption ROG Exhaust NOX Exhaust CO Exhaust SO2 Exhaust PM Exhaust CO2 Exhaust N2O Exhaust CH4 Exhaust CO2e CO2e
Generator Sets G2 2 1.28E+02 4.72E+01 2.84E+00 6.60E-04 1.13E-04 6.14E-03 6.26E-07 5.84E-05 1.52E-02 3.40E-05 4.10E-05 2.66E-02 9
Generator Sets G2 2 1.01E+02 2.50E+01 1.62E+00 4.54E-04 5.87E-05 3.74E-03 3.31E-07 3.27E-05 8.03E-03 1.77E-05 2.82E-05 1.41E-02 5
Generator Sets G2 15 1.29E+00 4.76E-01 2.69E-01 1.54E-05 1.03E-05 7.38E-04 5.68E-08 6.46E-07 1.38E-03 1.13E-06 9.60E-07 1.75E-03 1
Generator Sets G2 15 9.87E-01 2.44E-01 1.47E-01 2.04E-05 5.09E-06 4.06E-04 2.91E-08 7.89E-07 7.07E-04 5.60E-07 1.27E-06 9.07E-04 0
Pumps G2 2 5.10E+02 3.60E+02 1.91E+01 2.76E-03 8.36E-04 3.55E-02 4.85E-06 4.13E-04 1.18E-01 2.57E-04 1.71E-04 2.01E-01 67
Pumps G2 2 4.01E+02 1.90E+02 1.11E+01 2.31E-03 4.63E-04 2.32E-02 2.56E-06 2.32E-04 6.22E-02 1.39E-04 1.43E-04 1.08E-01 36
Pumps G2 15 1.38E+02 9.72E+01 4.93E+01 3.21E-03 2.43E-03 1.34E-01 1.05E-05 2.13E-03 2.54E-01 2.49E-04 2.00E-04 3.35E-01 111
Pumps G2 15 1.08E+02 5.13E+01 2.66E+01 2.23E-03 1.24E-03 7.25E-02 5.53E-06 1.12E-03 1.34E-01 1.29E-04 1.39E-04 1.77E-01 59
Pumps G2 25 1.66E+00 1.18E+00 1.30E+00 8.56E-05 5.79E-05 3.63E-03 2.69E-07 5.48E-05 6.53E-03 4.33E-06 5.32E-06 7.98E-03 3
Pumps G2 25 1.29E+00 6.15E-01 6.83E-01 4.56E-05 2.96E-05 1.91E-03 1.41E-07 2.86E-05 3.42E-03 2.24E-06 2.83E-06 4.17E-03 1
Generator Sets G4 5 1.69E+03 6.20E+02 1.53E+02 2.75E-02 6.34E-03 3.68E-01 2.76E-05 2.75E-03 7.98E-01 9.41E-04 1.52E-03 1.12E+00 371
Generator Sets G4 5 1.32E+03 3.28E+02 8.61E+01 1.63E-02 3.33E-03 2.21E-01 1.46E-05 1.43E-03 4.22E-01 4.95E-04 9.00E-04 5.94E-01 197
Generator Sets G4 15 4.63E+03 1.70E+03 1.04E+03 7.18E-02 4.47E-02 3.08E+00 1.41E-04 2.59E-03 4.93E+00 4.30E-03 3.97E-03 6.35E+00 2,101
Generator Sets G4 15 3.64E+03 9.00E+02 5.75E+02 5.08E-02 2.28E-02 1.75E+00 7.43E-05 1.35E-03 2.61E+00 2.23E-03 2.81E-03 3.36E+00 1,113
Generator Sets G4 25 2.49E+03 9.15E+02 1.21E+03 8.05E-02 4.90E-02 3.67E+00 1.42E-04 2.94E-03 5.59E+00 3.39E-03 4.45E-03 6.73E+00 2,230
Generator Sets G4 25 1.95E+03 4.83E+02 6.59E+02 5.41E-02 2.41E-02 2.04E+00 7.49E-05 1.53E-03 2.96E+00 1.72E-03 3.00E-03 3.56E+00 1,178
Generator Sets G4 50 8.28E+02 2.61E+02 5.94E+02 1.41E-02 2.65E-02 4.98E-01 5.95E-05 3.75E-04 4.89E+00 1.28E-03 7.79E-04 5.30E+00 1,756
Generator Sets G4 120 1.60E+02 5.03E+01 2.68E+02 4.32E-03 1.81E-02 9.33E-02 2.34E-05 1.88E-04 2.42E+00 4.76E-04 2.39E-04 2.57E+00 852
Generator Sets G4 175 1.51E+01 4.75E+00 4.29E+01 4.07E-04 3.24E-03 1.28E-02 3.89E-06 3.12E-05 3.92E-01 6.31E-05 2.25E-05 4.12E-01 136
Pumps G4 5 5.98E+02 4.22E+02 7.12E+01 1.19E-02 4.91E-03 1.45E-01 1.43E-05 2.71E-04 4.14E-01 6.96E-04 6.58E-04 6.44E-01 213
Pumps G4 5 4.70E+02 2.23E+02 4.16E+01 7.82E-03 2.44E-03 9.74E-02 7.55E-06 3.34E-04 2.19E-01 3.55E-04 4.33E-04 3.38E-01 112
Pumps G4 15 6.48E+02 4.58E+02 2.51E+02 1.97E-02 1.40E-02 7.32E-01 3.41E-05 1.00E-02 1.20E+00 1.26E-03 1.09E-03 1.61E+00 534
Pumps G4 15 5.09E+02 2.42E+02 1.35E+02 1.13E-02 7.10E-03 3.98E-01 1.80E-05 5.26E-03 6.32E-01 6.53E-04 6.26E-04 8.48E-01 281
Pumps G4 25 1.66E+02 1.17E+02 1.40E+02 1.09E-02 7.00E-03 4.20E-01 1.65E-05 5.46E-03 6.51E-01 4.62E-04 6.06E-04 8.07E-01 267
Pumps G4 25 1.30E+02 6.19E+01 7.44E+01 5.92E-03 3.59E-03 2.24E-01 8.71E-06 2.88E-03 3.44E-01 2.40E-04 3.28E-04 4.25E-01 141
Pumps G4 50 6.62E+01 4.00E+01 9.02E+01 2.16E-03 3.50E-03 7.82E-02 8.98E-06 5.66E-05 7.39E-01 1.77E-04 1.19E-04 7.96E-01 264
Pumps G4 120 8.39E+01 5.07E+01 3.07E+02 4.92E-03 1.64E-02 1.04E-01 2.68E-05 2.15E-04 2.78E+00 4.11E-04 2.73E-04 2.91E+00 965
Pumps G4 175 2.53E+00 1.53E+00 1.38E+01 1.27E-04 8.47E-04 4.26E-03 1.25E-06 1.00E-05 1.26E-01 1.65E-05 7.01E-06 1.31E-01 43
Air Compressors G4 5 2.16E+02 3.34E+02 7.42E+01 1.21E-02 5.36E-03 1.44E-01 1.53E-05 1.44E-04 4.43E-01 6.54E-04 6.70E-04 6.60E-01 218
Air Compressors G4 5 1.70E+02 1.77E+02 3.92E+01 6.40E-03 2.83E-03 7.62E-02 8.08E-06 7.63E-05 2.34E-01 3.46E-04 3.54E-04 3.49E-01 115
Air Compressors G4 15 1.09E+02 1.69E+02 6.57E+01 5.20E-03 3.79E-03 1.91E-01 8.95E-06 2.63E-03 3.14E-01 3.96E-04 2.87E-04 4.43E-01 147
Air Compressors G4 15 8.59E+01 8.94E+01 3.47E+01 2.68E-03 1.96E-03 1.01E-01 4.73E-06 1.39E-03 1.66E-01 2.07E-04 1.48E-04 2.33E-01 77
Air Compressors G4 25 1.47E+01 2.28E+01 2.22E+01 1.80E-03 1.15E-03 6.65E-02 2.60E-06 8.61E-04 1.03E-01 8.21E-05 9.93E-05 1.31E-01 43
Air Compressors G4 25 1.16E+01 1.21E+01 1.17E+01 9.32E-04 5.96E-04 3.51E-02 1.38E-06 4.56E-04 5.44E-02 4.30E-05 5.16E-05 6.88E-02 23
Air Compressors G4 50 2.52E+01 3.33E+01 7.32E+01 2.70E-03 3.55E-03 8.44E-02 6.86E-06 4.32E-05 5.64E-01 1.67E-04 1.50E-04 6.19E-01 205
Air Compressors G4 120 8.16E+01 1.08E+02 4.13E+02 1.12E-02 2.95E-02 2.10E-01 3.49E-05 2.80E-04 3.62E+00 8.38E-04 6.20E-04 3.89E+00 1,289
Air Compressors G4 175 5.49E+00 7.27E+00 4.99E+01 6.71E-04 4.29E-03 1.67E-02 4.50E-06 3.61E-05 4.53E-01 8.46E-05 3.71E-05 4.80E-01 159
Welders G4 15 4.22E+02 2.40E+02 1.37E+02 1.20E-02 7.18E-03 4.08E-01 1.82E-05 5.26E-03 6.38E-01 6.54E-04 6.63E-04 8.55E-01 283
Welders G4 25 1.53E+03 8.69E+02 7.75E+02 6.36E-02 3.74E-02 2.34E+00 9.04E-05 2.99E-02 3.57E+00 2.88E-03 3.52E-03 4.54E+00 1,502
Welders G4 50 1.31E+02 7.48E+01 1.83E+02 5.37E-03 8.69E-03 1.67E-01 1.80E-05 1.14E-04 1.48E+00 3.88E-04 2.97E-04 1.61E+00 532
Welders G4 120 1.34E+02 7.64E+01 2.60E+02 5.40E-03 1.82E-02 1.02E-01 2.25E-05 1.80E-04 2.33E+00 5.41E-04 2.99E-04 2.50E+00 829
Welders G4 175 9.25E+00 5.26E+00 3.18E+01 3.65E-04 2.58E-03 9.76E-03 2.88E-06 2.31E-05 2.90E-01 5.47E-05 2.02E-05 3.07E-01 102
Pressure Washers G4 5 4.53E+02 1.66E+02 5.89E+01 8.94E-03 2.54E-03 1.27E-01 1.16E-05 1.14E-03 3.35E-01 3.12E-04 4.95E-04 4.42E-01 146
Pressure Washers G4 5 3.56E+02 8.80E+01 3.53E+01 6.42E-03 1.39E-03 8.85E-02 6.11E-06 5.97E-04 1.77E-01 1.68E-04 3.55E-04 2.37E-01 78
Pressure Washers G4 15 4.04E+02 1.49E+02 8.83E+01 6.09E-03 3.79E-03 2.61E-01 1.19E-05 2.20E-04 4.18E-01 3.70E-04 3.37E-04 5.40E-01 179
Pressure Washers G4 15 3.17E+02 7.85E+01 4.88E+01 4.31E-03 1.93E-03 1.49E-01 6.30E-06 1.15E-04 2.21E-01 1.91E-04 2.38E-04 2.85E-01 94
Pressure Washers G4 25 7.58E+01 2.79E+01 4.35E+01 2.74E-03 1.75E-03 1.32E-01 5.12E-06 1.05E-04 2.02E-01 1.12E-04 1.52E-04 2.40E-01 79
Pressure Washers G4 25 5.96E+01 1.47E+01 2.36E+01 1.85E-03 8.75E-04 7.26E-02 2.70E-06 5.50E-05 1.07E-01 5.75E-05 1.02E-04 1.27E-01 42
Pressure Washers G4 50 7.40E+00 2.33E+00 5.93E+00 1.28E-04 2.26E-04 4.56E-03 6.03E-07 3.80E-06 4.96E-02 1.08E-05 7.11E-06 5.31E-02 18
Generator Sets C4 120 1.19E+01 3.74E+00 2.35E+01 1.67E-05 1.11E-03 4.93E-03 0.00E+00 1.40E-05 1.57E-01 0.00E+00 1.40E-04 1.60E-01 53
Generator Sets C4 175 9.87E+00 3.10E+00 3.39E+01 1.92E-05 1.60E-03 5.91E-03 0.00E+00 2.04E-05 2.29E-01 0.00E+00 1.61E-04 2.32E-01 77
Gas Compressors C4 50 1.85E+00 4.31E+01 1.47E+02 8.38E-05 3.04E-03 1.48E-02 0.00E+00 7.75E-05 1.01E+00 0.00E+00 7.02E-04 1.02E+00 339
Gas Compressors C4 120 3.82E+00 8.90E+01 8.62E+02 4.57E-04 1.80E-02 2.37E-01 0.00E+00 4.40E-04 5.68E+00 0.00E+00 3.83E-03 5.76E+00 1,907
Gas Compressors C4 175 6.17E-01 1.44E+01 2.21E+02 1.27E-04 4.82E-03 4.83E-02 0.00E+00 1.18E-04 1.48E+00 0.00E+00 1.07E-03 1.50E+00 498
Gas Compressors C4 250 4.93E-01 1.15E+01 2.29E+02 9.80E-05 4.66E-03 5.56E-02 0.00E+00 1.36E-04 1.52E+00 0.00E+00 8.22E-04 1.54E+00 509
Light Commercial Tons/Day MTons/Year
Equipment Fuel MaxHP Population Activity Consumption ROG Exhaust NOX Exhaust CO Exhaust SO2 Exhaust PM Exhaust CO2 Exhaust N2O Exhaust CH4 Exhaust CO2e CO2e
Gas Compressors C4 500 4.32E-01 1.00E+01 3.23E+02 1.38E-04 6.57E-03 7.83E-02 0.00E+00 1.91E-04 2.15E+00 0.00E+00 1.16E-03 2.17E+00 720
Generator Sets D 15 3.11E+02 2.88E+02 1.34E+02 2.09E-03 1.43E-02 9.75E-03 2.28E-05 8.01E-04 1.47E+00 0.00E+00 1.89E-04 1.47E+00 488
Generator Sets D 25 2.27E+02 2.10E+02 1.69E+02 2.75E-03 1.65E-02 9.37E-03 2.35E-05 9.24E-04 1.85E+00 0.00E+00 2.48E-04 1.86E+00 614
Generator Sets D 50 2.78E+02 2.57E+02 3.62E+02 1.04E-02 3.60E-02 3.29E-02 5.08E-05 2.85E-03 3.93E+00 0.00E+00 9.42E-04 3.95E+00 1,308
Generator Sets D 120 4.22E+02 3.90E+02 1.39E+03 2.03E-02 1.43E-01 9.48E-02 1.78E-04 1.09E-02 1.52E+01 0.00E+00 1.83E-03 1.52E+01 5,046
Generator Sets D 175 2.49E+01 2.31E+01 1.49E+02 1.47E-03 1.36E-02 8.47E-03 1.84E-05 6.49E-04 1.64E+00 0.00E+00 1.32E-04 1.64E+00 544
Generator Sets D 250 1.39E+01 1.29E+01 1.24E+02 7.82E-04 1.03E-02 2.77E-03 1.54E-05 2.83E-04 1.37E+00 0.00E+00 7.06E-05 1.37E+00 454
Generator Sets D 500 3.10E+01 2.87E+01 4.37E+02 2.48E-03 3.28E-02 1.01E-02 4.73E-05 9.37E-04 4.82E+00 0.00E+00 2.24E-04 4.82E+00 1,598
Generator Sets D 750 1.93E+01 1.78E+01 4.38E+02 2.57E-03 3.39E-02 1.02E-02 4.86E-05 9.56E-04 4.84E+00 0.00E+00 2.32E-04 4.84E+00 1,604
Generator Sets D 9999 5.01E+00 4.64E+00 2.20E+02 1.76E-03 2.29E-02 6.28E-03 2.44E-05 6.30E-04 2.43E+00 0.00E+00 1.58E-04 2.43E+00 806
Pumps D 15 2.33E+02 2.57E+02 8.75E+01 1.57E-03 9.46E-03 6.35E-03 1.49E-05 6.10E-04 9.55E-01 0.00E+00 1.41E-04 9.58E-01 317
Pumps D 25 6.97E+01 7.69E+01 6.85E+01 1.34E-03 6.69E-03 3.79E-03 9.50E-06 4.04E-04 7.49E-01 0.00E+00 1.21E-04 7.52E-01 249
Pumps D 50 1.22E+02 1.34E+02 2.12E+02 6.58E-03 2.13E-02 2.02E-02 2.97E-05 1.75E-03 2.30E+00 0.00E+00 5.93E-04 2.31E+00 766
Pumps D 120 2.38E+02 2.63E+02 9.36E+02 1.42E-02 9.76E-02 6.48E-02 1.20E-04 7.69E-03 1.02E+01 0.00E+00 1.28E-03 1.02E+01 3,386
Pumps D 175 2.58E+01 2.84E+01 1.81E+02 1.86E-03 1.69E-02 1.05E-02 2.24E-05 8.25E-04 1.99E+00 0.00E+00 1.68E-04 1.99E+00 660
Pumps D 250 1.86E+01 2.05E+01 1.87E+02 1.23E-03 1.58E-02 4.24E-03 2.32E-05 4.43E-04 2.06E+00 0.00E+00 1.11E-04 2.06E+00 683
Pumps D 500 3.67E-01 4.04E-01 6.32E+00 3.76E-05 4.79E-04 1.50E-04 6.85E-07 1.40E-05 6.97E-02 0.00E+00 3.39E-06 6.98E-02 23
Pumps D 750 6.11E-02 6.74E-02 1.74E+00 1.07E-05 1.36E-04 4.14E-05 1.93E-07 3.94E-06 1.92E-02 0.00E+00 9.63E-07 1.92E-02 6
Pumps D 9999 1.34E+00 1.48E+00 9.10E+01 7.44E-04 9.56E-03 2.66E-03 1.01E-05 2.65E-04 1.00E+00 0.00E+00 6.71E-05 1.00E+00 332
Air Compressors D 15 3.18E+00 7.09E+00 2.34E+00 4.20E-05 2.53E-04 1.70E-04 3.98E-07 1.63E-05 2.56E-02 0.00E+00 3.79E-06 2.57E-02 9
Air Compressors D 25 6.30E+00 1.40E+01 9.26E+00 1.81E-04 9.05E-04 5.13E-04 1.29E-06 5.47E-05 1.01E-01 0.00E+00 1.63E-05 1.01E-01 34
Air Compressors D 50 5.72E+01 1.28E+02 1.32E+02 5.48E-03 1.39E-02 1.57E-02 1.84E-05 1.33E-03 1.42E+00 0.00E+00 4.94E-04 1.43E+00 474
Air Compressors D 120 3.81E+02 8.50E+02 1.83E+03 3.30E-02 2.04E-01 1.36E-01 2.34E-04 1.83E-02 1.99E+01 0.00E+00 2.98E-03 2.00E+01 6,610
Air Compressors D 175 1.44E+01 3.22E+01 1.30E+02 1.61E-03 1.29E-02 8.06E-03 1.60E-05 7.20E-04 1.42E+00 0.00E+00 1.45E-04 1.42E+00 471
Air Compressors D 250 2.03E+01 4.53E+01 2.69E+02 2.17E-03 2.44E-02 6.56E-03 3.34E-05 7.41E-04 2.97E+00 0.00E+00 1.96E-04 2.97E+00 985
Air Compressors D 500 2.65E+01 5.90E+01 6.19E+02 4.59E-03 4.96E-02 1.56E-02 6.71E-05 1.59E-03 6.83E+00 0.00E+00 4.14E-04 6.84E+00 2,264
Air Compressors D 750 9.90E+00 2.21E+01 3.58E+02 2.69E-03 2.96E-02 9.00E-03 3.97E-05 9.37E-04 3.95E+00 0.00E+00 2.42E-04 3.96E+00 1,310
Air Compressors D 1000 2.44E-01 5.45E-01 1.20E+01 1.09E-04 1.33E-03 3.73E-04 1.33E-06 3.84E-05 1.32E-01 0.00E+00 9.80E-06 1.32E-01 44
Welders D 15 1.06E+02 1.86E+02 5.28E+01 9.45E-04 5.71E-03 3.83E-03 8.96E-06 3.68E-04 5.76E-01 0.00E+00 8.52E-05 5.78E-01 191
Welders D 25 9.29E+01 1.63E+02 8.43E+01 1.65E-03 8.23E-03 4.66E-03 1.17E-05 4.97E-04 9.22E-01 0.00E+00 1.49E-04 9.25E-01 306
Welders D 50 2.86E+02 5.03E+02 6.06E+02 2.30E-02 6.28E-02 6.69E-02 8.43E-05 5.71E-03 6.52E+00 0.00E+00 2.07E-03 6.56E+00 2,173
Welders D 120 2.22E+02 3.91E+02 7.06E+02 1.20E-02 7.71E-02 5.13E-02 9.04E-05 6.62E-03 7.71E+00 0.00E+00 1.08E-03 7.73E+00 2,560
Welders D 175 1.10E+00 1.94E+00 8.66E+00 1.01E-04 8.43E-04 5.24E-04 1.07E-06 4.50E-05 9.50E-02 0.00E+00 9.08E-06 9.52E-02 32
Welders D 250 2.44E-01 4.30E-01 2.32E+00 1.75E-05 2.05E-04 5.52E-05 2.88E-07 6.11E-06 2.56E-02 0.00E+00 1.58E-06 2.56E-02 8
Welders D 500 6.11E-01 1.08E+00 8.16E+00 5.60E-05 6.42E-04 2.02E-04 8.84E-07 2.00E-05 9.00E-02 0.00E+00 5.05E-06 9.01E-02 30
Pressure Washers D 15 1.44E+01 5.72E+00 1.28E+00 2.00E-05 1.36E-04 9.30E-05 2.18E-07 7.64E-06 1.40E-02 0.00E+00 1.80E-06 1.40E-02 5
Pressure Washers D 25 3.36E+00 1.33E+00 4.35E-01 7.06E-06 4.25E-05 2.41E-05 6.04E-08 2.38E-06 4.76E-03 0.00E+00 6.37E-07 4.77E-03 2
Pressure Washers D 50 6.66E+00 2.64E+00 1.73E+00 3.89E-05 1.67E-04 1.34E-04 2.44E-07 1.18E-05 1.89E-02 0.00E+00 3.51E-06 1.90E-02 6
Pressure Washers D 120 2.75E+00 1.09E+00 1.20E+00 1.55E-05 1.18E-04 7.81E-05 1.54E-07 8.17E-06 1.31E-02 0.00E+00 1.40E-06 1.31E-02 4
28,732 15,000 20,208 0.728 1.437 20.066 0.002 0.154 170.346 0.029 0.054 180.328 59,711
Population Activity Consumption lbs/day Tons/Day MTons/Year
786 410 553 40 79 1,098 0 8 5 0 0 5 1,634
As a percent of 2010 Total Employment Santa Clara 1,001,074 Cupertino 27,387 Percent 3%
SOURCE: U.S. Census Bureau. 2010. Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics. http://lehd.ces.census.gov/ for the City of Cupertino and Santa Clara County. Third Quarter 2012 total employment in Santa Clara County.
Building Permits
2012 Building Permits
Monthly New Privately-Owned Residential Building Permits
Santa Clara County California ( 085)
Estimates with Imputation Reported Only
Item Buildings Units Construction cost Buildings Units Construction cost
Single Family 1,460 1,460 $542,080,995 1,451 1,451 $536,080,482
Two Family 14 28 $7,363,556 14 28 $7,363,556
Three and Four Family 17 62 $14,115,162 16 59 $13,590,124
Five or More Family 73 3,941 $488,626,275 73 3,941 $488,626,275
Total 1,564 5,491 $1,052,185,988 1,554 5,479 $1,045,660,437
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Building Permits
2012 Building Permits
Monthly New Privately-Owned Residential Building Permits
Cupertino California (Santa Clara County - 102000)
Estimates with Imputation Reported Only
Item Buildings Units Construction cost Buildings Units Construction cost
Single Family 43 43 $19,729,310 43 43 $19,729,310
Two Family 0 0 $0 0 0 $0
Three and Four Family 0 0 $0 0 0 $0
Five or More Family 0 0 $0 0 0 $0
Total 43 43 $19,729,310 43 43 $19,729,310
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Building Permits
2011 Building Permits
Monthly New Privately-Owned Residential Building Permits
Santa Clara County California ( 085)
Estimates with Imputation Reported Only
Item Buildings Units Construction cost Buildings Units Construction cost
Single Family 970 970 $373,915,393 969 969 $373,178,423
Two Family 1 2 $285,931 1 2 $285,931
Three and Four Family 13 50 $10,470,595 13 50 $10,470,595
Five or More Family 45 2,043 $316,268,258 45 2,043 $316,268,258
Total 1,029 3,065 $700,940,177 1,028 3,064 $700,203,207
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Building Permits
2011 Building Permits
Monthly New Privately-Owned Residential Building Permits
Cupertino California (Santa Clara County - 102000)
Estimates with Imputation Reported Only
Item Buildings Units Construction cost Buildings Units Construction cost
Single Family 51 51 $18,503,500 51 51 $18,503,500
Two Family 0 0 $0 0 0 $0
Three and Four Family 0 0 $0 0 0 $0
Five or More Family 0 0 $0 0 0 $0
Total 51 51 $18,503,500 51 51 $18,503,500
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Building Permits
2010 Building Permits
Monthly New Privately-Owned Residential Building Permits
Santa Clara County California ( 085)
Estimates with Imputation Reported Only
Item Buildings Units Construction cost Buildings Units Construction cost
Single Family 814 814 $302,853,232 768 768 $289,720,665
Two Family 2 4 $531,568 2 4 $531,568
Three and Four Family 6 23 $2,991,693 6 23 $2,991,693
Five or More Family 82 3,291 $439,112,314 75 3,216 $422,602,429
Total 904 4,132 $745,488,807 851 4,011 $715,846,355
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Building Permits
2010 Building Permits
Monthly New Privately-Owned Residential Building Permits
Cupertino California (Santa Clara County - 102000)
Estimates with Imputation Reported Only
Item Buildings Units Construction cost Buildings Units Construction cost
Single Family 24 24 $12,828,000 24 24 $12,828,000
Two Family 0 0 $0 0 0 $0
Three and Four Family 0 0 $0 0 0 $0
Five or More Family 0 0 $0 0 0 $0
Total 24 24 $12,828,000 24 24 $12,828,000
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Building Permits
2009 Building Permits
Monthly New Privately-Owned Residential Building Permits
Santa Clara County California ( 085)
Estimates with Imputation Reported Only
Item Buildings Units Construction cost Buildings Units Construction cost
Single Family 602 602 $232,678,625 602 602 $232,678,625
Two Family 14 28 $5,815,198 14 28 $5,815,198
Three and Four Family 2 7 $1,026,717 2 7 $1,026,717
Five or More Family 25 417 $65,633,351 25 417 $65,633,351
Total 643 1,054 $305,153,891 643 1,054 $305,153,891
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Building Permits
2009 Building Permits
Monthly New Privately-Owned Residential Building Permits
Cupertino California (Santa Clara County - 102000)
Estimates with Imputation Reported Only
Item Buildings Units Construction cost Buildings Units Construction cost
Single Family 21 21 $8,813,650 21 21 $8,813,650
Two Family 0 0 $0 0 0 $0
Three and Four Family 0 0 $0 0 0 $0
Five or More Family 0 0 $0 0 0 $0
Total 21 21 $8,813,650 21 21 $8,813,650
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Building Permits
2008 Building Permits
Monthly New Privately-Owned Residential Building Permits
Santa Clara County California ( 085)
Estimates with Imputation Reported Only
Item Buildings Units Construction cost Buildings Units Construction cost
Single Family 939 939 $333,187,741 930 930 $331,012,289
Two Family 25 50 $12,499,260 25 50 $12,499,260
Three and Four Family 13 49 $7,147,563 13 49 $7,147,563
Five or More Family 99 2,433 $298,383,925 99 2,433 $298,383,925
Total 1,076 3,471 $651,218,489 1,067 3,462 $649,043,037
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Building Permits
2008 Building Permits
Monthly New Privately-Owned Residential Building Permits
Cupertino California (Santa Clara County - 102000)
Estimates with Imputation Reported Only
Item Buildings Units Construction cost Buildings Units Construction cost
Single Family 65 65 $29,708,327 65 65 $29,708,327
Two Family 21 42 $11,666,655 21 42 $11,666,655
Three and Four Family 0 0 $0 0 0 $0
Five or More Family 0 0 $0 0 0 $0
Total 86 107 $41,374,982 86 107 $41,374,982
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Region
United Inside Outside North-
Year States MSAs MSAs east Midwest South West
1973 1,660 1,760 1,490 1,595 1,615 1,670 1,715 1,699
1974 1,695 1,785 1,545 1,600 1,660 1,760 1,660
1975 1,645 1,735 1,490 1,575 1,580 1,705 1,635
1976 1,700 1,775 1,560 1,630 1,655 1,755 1,685
1977 1,720 1,795 1,565 1,650 1,650 1,770 1,730
1978 1,755 1,830 1,610 1,730 1,730 1,785 1,740
1979 1,760 1,845 1,605 1,795 1,720 1,795 1,730
1980 1,740 1,825 1,575 1,770 1,685 1,750 1,735 1,968
1981 1,720 1,820 1,535 1,805 1,670 1,715 1,735
1982 1,710 1,795 1,545 1,755 1,655 1,700 1,740
1983 1,725 1,785 1,570 1,795 1,735 1,720 1,695
1984 1,780 1,840 1,600 1,860 1,800 1,750 1,785
1985 1,785 1,830 1,610 1,830 1,820 1,765 1,770
1986 1,825 1,865 1,640 1,850 1,855 1,825 1,800
1987 1,905 1,950 1,700 1,955 1,890 1,915 1,870
1988 1,995 2,055 1,750 2,005 2,015 1,985 1,995
1989 2,035 2,105 1,750 2,075 1,970 2,030 2,065
1990 2,080 2,155 1,800 2,105 2,005 2,055 2,160
1991 2,075 2,155 1,815 2,105 1,990 2,065 2,155
1992 2,095 2,160 1,870 2,115 2,020 2,130 2,090
1993 2,095 2,160 1,860 2,160 2,025 2,150 2,050
1994 2,100 2,160 1,865 2,195 2,025 2,165 2,025
1995 2,095 2,150 1,870 2,240 2,020 2,125 2,045
1996 2,120 2,170 1,915 2,280 2,025 2,160 2,070
1997 2,150 2,200 1,955 2,265 2,065 2,175 2,135
1998 2,190 2,250 1,930 2,270 2,125 2,200 2,200
1999 2,223 2,274 1,991 2,298 2,135 2,244 2,234
2000 2,266 2,321 2,024 2,435 2,170 2,287 2,244 2,404
2001 2,324 2,361 2,162 2,466 2,209 2,351 2,317
2002 2,320 2,379 2,068 2,516 2,209 2,317 2,350
2003 2,330 2,382 2,113 2,443 2,198 2,335 2,387
2004 2,349 2,402 2,122 2,543 2,222 2,368 2,352
2005 2,434 2,479 2,137 2,556 2,310 2,463 2,434
2006 2,469 2,519 2,120 2,612 2,290 2,499 2,488
2007 2,521 2,581 2,133 2,550 2,328 2,573 2,524
2008 2,519 2,582 2,203 2,651 2,331 2,564 2,508
2009 2,438 2,490 2,156 2,594 2,216 2,488 2,434
2010 2,392 2,443 2,091 2,613 2,265 2,393 2,386 2,448
2011 2,480 2,550 2,060 2,559 2,287 2,538 2,457
2012 2,505 2,563 2,118 2,582 2,341 2,549 2,502
RSE 2 2 4 6 3 3 3
Footnotes:
RSE - Relative Standard Error (percent)
NA - Not available
A - Represents an RSE that is greater or equal to 100 percent or could not be computed
Z - Less than 500 units or less than 0.5 percent
S - Withheld because estimate did not meet publication standards on the basis of response rate
or a consistency review
1Includes houses built for rent (not shown separately).
Average square feet
Median and Average Square Feet of Floor Area in New Single-
Family Houses Completed by Location1
(Medians and averages computed from unrounded figures)
Criteria Air Pollutant and GHG Emissions
Industrial (BAAQMD Permitted)
BAAQMD PERMITTED - 2010 BAY AREA GHG EMITTING FACILITIES
Plant #Plant Name Plant Address City County Zipcode Bio-genic Non-Biogenic Total
20387 Apple Computer 20330 Stevens Creek Blv. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 3.15 3.15
18604 Apple Inc.. 19333 Vallco Pkwy Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 10.56 10.56
9721 Apple Inc.. 2 Infinite Loop Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 7.64 7.64
16709 Apple Inc.. 20605 Lazaneo Dr. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 6.34 6.34
18440 Apple Inc.. 10500 Ridgeview Court Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 1.30 1.30
19241 Apple Inc.. 20400 Mariani Ave. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 1.02 1.02
15603 Apple Inc.. 10500 N. DeAnza Blv. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 0.28 0.28
20034 Apple Inc.. 10725 N. De Anza Blv. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 0.08 0.08
16704 Apple Inc.. (De Anza 6 facility) 10355 N. De Anza Blv. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 2.31 2.31
15604 Apple Inc.. (Valley Green 3) 20740 Valley Green Dr. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 3.00 3.00
19036 Chateau Cupertino East Courtyard Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 0.91 0.91
18553 Cupertino City Center Buildings 20400 Stevens Creek Blv. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 1.83 1.83
18555 Cupertino City Center Garage 20350 Stevens Creek Blv. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 0.51 0.51
14562 Cypress Hotel 10050 DeAnza Blv. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 0.31 0.31
13067 Durect Corp. 10240 Bubb Rd. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 0.25 0.25
14594 Federal Aviation Administration Mountain View QQU RTR Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 0.58 0.58
15654 Foothill/DeAnza Community College Dist. 21250 Stevens Creek Blv. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 413.37 413.37
667 Hewlett-Packard Comp. 10900 Wolfe Rd. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 2,622.48 2,622.48
16390 JC Penny Comp.10150 N. Wolfe Rd. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 0.18 0.18
19942 Lucky Supermarkets 10425 South De Anza Blv. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 0.65 0.65
16354 Macy's Valco 10333 N. Wolfe Rd. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 0.51 0.51
17797 Marianist Center 22622 Marianist Way Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 0.64 0.64
9187 PG&E Cupertino Service Center 10900 N. Blaney Ave. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 2.07 2.07
17900 RWC LLC c/o Embarcadero Realty Services LP 2 Results Way Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 0.71 0.71
16806 Sears 10101 N. Wolfe Rd. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 0.20 0.20
10394 Stevens Creek Quarry Inc.. 12100 Stevens Canyon Rd. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 271.40 271.40
17616 Target Store 20745 Stevens Creek Blv. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 0.34 0.34
16623 Verona Owners Assoc. c/o Boardwalk Invest Group 20488 Stevens Creek Blv. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 2.18 2.18
0 3,355 3,355
Excluded the Lehigh Southwest Cement Company GHG Emissions as the actual emissions occur in unincorporated Santa Clara County and not the City of Cupertino:
Plant #Plant Name Plant Address City County Zipcode Bio-genic Non-Biogenic Total
17 Lehigh Southwest Cement Comp. 24001 Stevens Creek Blv. Cupertino Santa Clara 95014 - 676,615.19 676,615.19
Source: Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2010. Bay Area GHG Emitting Facilities. Provided by Abby Young March
CO2 Equivalent Emissions**
( Metric Tons/ Year )
........................................................................................................................
APPENDIX D:
CULTURAL RESOURCE DATA
........................................................................................................................
A Cultural Resources Study of Seven Proposed Development Locations for the Cupertino General Plan Amendment Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California Virginia Hagensieker, B.A. and Janine M. Origer , M.A./R.P.A. July 24, 2013
A Cultural Resources Study of Seven Proposed Development Locations for the Cupertino General Plan Amendment Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California Prepared by: Virginia Hagensieker, B.A. and Janine M. Origer M.A./R.P.A. Tom Origer & Associates Post Office Box 1531 Rohnert Park, California 94927 (707) 584-8200 (707) 584-8300 (fax) Prepared for: Terri McCracken The Planning Center | DC&E 1625 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 300 Berkeley, CA 94709 July 24, 2013
i ABSTRACT Tom Origer & Associates conducted a cultural resources study for the Cupertino General Plan Amendment, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California. The study was requested by Terri McCracken, The Planning Center | DC&E, in compliance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. The study consists of a survey of seven proposed development sites. This study included archival research at the Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University (NWIC File No. 12-1615 & 13-0045), examination of the library and files of Tom Origer & Associates, field inspection of the project locations, and contact with the Native American community. Six of the seven proposed development areas were subjected to field survey. The seventh, the PG&E substation, was not surveyed because access was not granted by the landowner. Field survey of six of the seven proposed development areas found no cultural resources. Documentation pertaining to this study is on file at the offices of Tom Origer & Associates (File No. 13-066). Survey Synopsis Project: Cupertino General Plan Amendment Location: Cupertino Quadrangle: Cupertino, California 7.5’ series Study Type: Existing conditions Scope: Field total of ~121 acres (7 locations) Finds: None
ii Project Personnel Janine M. Origer provided project oversight. Ms. Origer has 30 years experience working in Northern California cultural resources management. She has been with Tom Origer & Associates since 1991. She has worked on both prehistoric and historical archaeological sites, and has completed research and documentation of historical buildings. Ms. Origer has a Bachelor of Arts in Anthropology from Sonoma State University. She holds a Master of Arts in Archaeology and Heritage from the University of Leicester. She has completed extensive continuing education in regulatory compliance, planning local surveys, and identifying historical resources. She is affiliated with the Society for California Archaeology (Secretary of the Executive Board 2004-2006), the International Association for Obsidian Studies, the Society for American Archaeology, the Society for Historical Archaeology, Society of Architectural Historians, Vernacular Architecture Forum, and the Register of Professional Archaeologists (#1066030). Virginia Hagensieker participated in the field work and prepared the report for this project. Ms. Hagensieker has been with Tom Origer & Associates since May 2010. She holds a Bachelor of Arts in Anthropology from Sonoma State University. She is working towards a Master of Arts in Cultural Resources Management at Sonoma State University. She is affiliated with the Society for California Archaeology. Scotty Thompson participated in the field work for this project. He has been with Tom Origer & Associates since 1983. Mr. Thompson has been involved in northern and central California archaeology since 1975. He holds a Bachelor of Arts in Anthropology from Sonoma State University. He specializes in field survey, cartography, and computer graphics and has a number of maps and illustrations published in northern California texts and journal articles.
iii CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................................................................................... i Survey Synopsis ...................................................................................................................... i Project Personnel .................................................................................................................... ii Contents .................................................................................................................................... iii Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Regulatory Context .................................................................................................................... 1 Resource Definitions .............................................................................................................. 2 Significance Criteria............................................................................................................... 2 Project Setting ............................................................................................................................ 3 Study Area Location and Description .................................................................................... 3 Cultural Setting ...................................................................................................................... 3 Study Procedures and Findings .................................................................................................. 6 Native American Contact ....................................................................................................... 6 Archival Study Procedures ..................................................................................................... 6 Archival Study Findings ........................................................................................................ 6 Field Survey Procedures ........................................................................................................ 7 Field Survey Findings ............................................................................................................ 8 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 8 Known Resources................................................................................................................... 8 Accidental Discovery ............................................................................................................. 8 Summary .................................................................................................................................... 8 Materials Consulted ................................................................................................................... 9 Appendix A: Native American Contact FIGU RES Figure 1. Project vicinity 1 Figure 2. Survey locations 4 TABLES Table 1. Archival results 7
1 INTRODUCTION This report describes a cultural resources study of seven potential development locations within the city of Cupertino, in northwestern Santa Clara County, California (Figure 1). Project plans include potential future development of the seven study areas. This study was requested by Terri McCracken, The Planning Center | DC&E in support of an environmental impact report for the Cupertino General Plan Amendment. Documentation pertaining to this study is on file at Tom Origer & Associates (File No. 13-066). REGULATORY CONTEXT The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that cultural resources be considered during the environmental review process. This is accomplished by an inventory of resources within a study area and by assessing the potential that cultural resources could be affected by development. This cultural resources survey was designed to satisfy environmental issues specified in the CEQA and its guidelines (Title 14 CCR §15064.5) by: (1) identifying all cultural resources within the project area; (2) offering a preliminary significance evaluation of the identified cultural resources; (3) assessing resource vulnerability to effects that could arise from project activities; and (4) offering suggestions designed to protect resource integrity, as warranted. Figure 1. Project vicinity (adapted from the 1956 San Francisco and 1966 San Jose 1:250,000-scale USGS maps).
2 Resource Definitions Cultural resources are classified by the State Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) as sites, buildings, structures, objects and districts, and each is described by OHP (1995) as follows. Site. A site is the location of a significant event, a prehistoric or historic occupation or activity, or a building or structure, whether standing, ruined, or vanished, where the location itself possesses historic, cultural, or archaeo-logical value regardless of the value of any existing structure. Building. A building, such as a house, barn, church, hotel, or similar construc-tion, is created principally to shelter any form of human activity. "Building" may also be used to refer to a historically and functionally related unit, such as a courthouse and jail, or a house and barn. Structure. The term "structure" is used to distinguish from buildings those functional constructions made usually for purposes other than creating human shelter. Object. The term "object" is used to distinguish from buildings and structures those constructions that are primarily artistic in nature or are relatively small in scale and simply constructed. Although it may be, by nature or design, movable, an object is associated with a specific setting or environment. District. A district possesses a significant concentration, linkage, or continuity of sites, buildings, structures, or objects united historically or aesthetically by plan or physical development. Significance Criteria When a project might affect a cultural resource, the project proponent is required to conduct an assessment to determine whether the effect may be one that is significant. Consequently, it is necessary to determine the importance of resources that could be affected. The importance of a resource is measured in terms of criteria for inclusion on the California Register of Historical Resources (Title 14 CCR, §4852(a)) as listed below. A resource may be important if it meets any one of the criteria below, or if it is already listed on the California Register of Historical Resources or a local register of historical resources. An important historical resource is one which: 1. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States.
3 2. Is associated with the lives of persons important to local, California, or national history. 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction, or represents the work of a master or possesses high artistic values. 4. It has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important to the pre-history or history of the local area, California, or the nation. In addition to meeting one or more of the above criteria, eligibility for the California Register requires that a resource retains sufficient integrity to convey a sense of its significance or importance. Seven elements are considered key in considering a property’s integrity: loca-tion, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Additionally, the OHP advocates that all historical resources over 45 years old be recorded for inclusion in the OHP filing system (OHP 1995:2), although the use of professional judgment is urged in determining whether a resource warrants documentation. PROJECT SETTING Study Area Location and Description The study area comprises seven proposed development areas within the City of Cupertino, as shown on the Cupertino, California 7.5’ USGS topographic map (Figure 2). At present, the study areas are developed. The nearest fresh water source to any of the study areas is Calabazas Creek , which is about one-eighth of a mile southeast of Location 6. The terrain in all seven study areas is flat . The geology of the study area is recent alluvium (Jennings and Burnett 1961) and soils within the study areas consist of four different, well -draining, urban land complexes: the Urbanland-Flaskan, Urbanland-Botella, Urbanland-Stevenscreek, and Urbanland-Elpaloalto complexes (California Soil Resource Lab 2010). Cultural Setting Archaeological evidence indicates that human occupation of California began at least 12,000 years ago (Fredrickson 1984:506). Early occupants appear to have had an economy based largely on hunting, with limited exchange, and social structures based on extended family units. Later, milling technology and an inferred acorn economy were introduced. This diver-sification of economy appears coeval with the development of sedentism, population growth, and expansion. Sociopolitical complexity and status distinctions based on wealth are also observable in the archaeological record, as evidenced by an increased range and distribution
4 Figure 2. Survey locations (adapted from the 1961 [1980] Cupertino 7.5’ USGS topographic map).
5 of trade goods (e.g., shell beads, obsidian tool stone), which are possible indicators of both status and increasingly complex exchange systems. At the time of European settlement, the study area was situated within the area controlled by the Tamyen linguistic group of the Ohlone/Costanoan, near the linguistic boundary with the Ramaytush group (Levy 1978). The Ohlone/Costanoan hunter-gatherers who lived in rich environments that allowed for dense populations with complex social structures (Barrett 1908; Kroeber 1925). They settled in large, permanent villages about which were distributed seasonal camps and task-specific sites. Primary village sites were occupied throughout the year and other sites were visited in order to procure particular resources that were especially abundant or available only during certain seasons. Sites often were situated near fresh water sources and in ecotones where plant life and animal life were diverse and abundant. For more information about the Ohlone/Costanoan see Bean (1994), Margolin (1978), Milliken (1995), and Teixeira (1997). Colonel Juan Bautista de Anza's party passed through the arroyo of San Joseph de Cupertino during exploration in March of 1776 (Bolton 1930). One year later, the first Christian baptisms began in the Santa Clara Valley. Despite rampant disease and humiliation, recruitment escalated at the missions of the San Francisco Bay area. By the end of 1795, all of the Tamyen/Tamien villages had been abandoned and their former inhabitants baptized (Milliken 1995). During the 19th century, the area was planted with vineyards and orchards by early European settlers and flourished well enough to draw more settlers to the area. Due to French and European vineyards failing in the late 1870s by phylloxera, California vineyards and wines did well, leading small communities to have wide-scal e development and expansion. By the 1890s, phylloxera had spread from Europe, and the community shifted toward more fruit production. Before the community at the crossroads of Stevens Creek Road and Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road (De Anza Boulevard) changed their name to Cupertino in 1904, it was known simply as West Side. 'Cupertino' was taken from John T. Doyle's naming his winery Cupertino after the name given to the nearby creek by Petrus Font during De Anza's 1776 expedition. By the 1920s, Cupertino had a population of about 500, and development of the area centered around the agricultural economy, with a focus on wineries, canneries, and fruit drying and packing facilities. The Permanente Corporation was formed in 1939 to provide cement for the construction of Shasta Dam, with a huge plant and quarry just west of Cupertino. During the war, the plant also made record shipments of cement to the Pacific theatres (Kinnard 1966). As the gateway to the Pacific theatre, the San Francisco Bay area experienced a post-war population boom, which in turn created a need for urban planning. In 1955, Cupertino was incorporated as Santa Clara County's 13th city in part to combat the annexation encroachment by the surrounding cities of Santa Clara, San Jose, Sunnyvale and Los Altos. In the 1960s, Cupertino transitioned from farming to industry and commercial expansion. This transition was done in anticipation, rather than as a reaction. One early successful example of this is the coalition of families that created VALLCO park, which currently
6 includes the Vallco Fashion Park. Cupertino is part of Silicon Valley, a world-renowned high-tech nology center and is home to many companies at the forefront of innovation. STUDY PROCEDURES AND FINDINGS Native American Contact The State of California’s Native American Heritage Commission was contacted in writing. A log of contact efforts is provided at the end of this report (Appendix A). Archival Study Procedures Archival research included examination of the library and project files at Tom Origer & Associates. A review (NWIC File No. 12-1615 & 13-0045) was completed of the archaeological site base maps and records, survey reports, and other materials on file at the Northwest Information Center (NWIC), Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. Sources of information included but were not limited to the current listings of properties on the National Register of Historic Places (National Register), California Historical Landmarks, California Register of Historical Resources (California Register), and California Points of Historical Interest as listed in the Office of Historic Preservation’s Historic Property Directory (OHP 2011). The Office of Historic Preservation has determined that structures older than 45 years should be considered potentially important historical resources, and former building and structure locations could be potentially important historic archaeological sites. Archival research included an examination of historical maps to gain insight into the nature and extent of historical development in the general vicinity, and especially within the study area. Maps ranged from hand-drawn maps of the 1800s (e.g., GLO plats) to topographic maps issued by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) from the early to the middle 20th century. In addition, ethnographic literature that describes appropriate Native American groups, county histories, and other primary and secondary sources were reviewed. Sources reviewed are listed in the "Materials Consulted" section of this report. Archival Study Findings Archival research found that only one of the seven locations had any portions previously studied, and that eleven studies have been completed within one-quarter mile of the subject properties (T able 1).
7 Survey Location Location Name Studies within ¼ mile Recorded Resources within ¼ mile 1 Cupertino Inn and Goodyear Tire Psota 1998 2 City Center Price 1998a 3 PG&E Price 1998b 4 Mirapath Price 1998b 5 Cupertino Village Losee 2012 6 Vallco Shopping District Cartier 1987; Edwards 1974; Holman 2001 (covers a small portion); Losee 2001, 2002 7 Stevens Creek Office Center Trianon Foundation 1972 Le Petit Trianon building, De Anza College Table 1. Archival results There are no reported ethnographic sites in the vicinity (Kroeber 1925). Historical maps show buildings on each of the study areas at some point, but few, if any, are the same buildings through time. Locations 1 and 2 show buildings on the 1961 [1980] map that are near the location of buildings on the 1899 map (GLO 1864, 1866; Thompson and West 1876; USACE 1940; USGS 1899, 1953, 1961a, 1961b). Field Survey Procedures Field survey of six of the seven potential development areas was completed by Virginia Hagensieker and Nelson "Scotty" Thompson on July 19, 2013. Permission was not granted by the landowner to access Location 3 for survey. The six accessible survey areas were examined as intensively as possible, with a focus on any exposed soils. Visibility was poor, with landscaping, fill materials, and pavement being the chief hindrances. Hoes were used as needed to clear small patches of vegetation so that the ground could be inspected. A hand auger was used to inspect soils below landscaping and development fill material where possible. Prehistoric archaeological site indicators expected to be found in the region include but are not limited to: obsidian and chert flakes and chipped stone tools; grinding and mashing implements such as slabs and handstones, and mortars and pestles; bedrock outcrops and boulders with mortar cups; and locally darkened midden soils containing some of the previously listed items plus fragments of bone, shellfish, and fire affected stones. Historic period site indicators generally include: fragments of glass, ceramic, and metal objects; milled and split lumber; and structure and feature remains such as building foundations and discrete trash deposits (e.g., wells, privy pits, dumps).
8 Field Survey Findings No cultural resources were found within the survey area s. The buildings present at each of the study locations do not appear to be over 45 years old. RECOMMENDATIONS Known Resources No prehistoric or historic-era archaeological sites were found within the study area, and no resource-specific recommendations are warranted. Accidental Discovery There is the possibility that buried archaeological deposits could be present within the City of Cupertino, and accidental discovery could occur. In keeping with the CEQA guidelines, if archaeological remains are uncovered, work at the place of discovery should be halted immediately until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the finds (§15064.5 [f]). Prehistoric archaeological site indicators include: obsidian and chert flakes and chipped stone tools; grinding and mashing implements (e.g., slabs and handstones, and mortars and pestles); bedrock outcrops and boulders with mortar cups; and locally darkened midden soils. Midden soils may contain a combination of any of the previously listed items with the possible addition of bone and shell remains, and fire affected stones. Historic period site indicators generally include: fragments of glass, ceramic, and metal objects; milled and split lumber; and structure and feature remains such as building foundations and discrete trash deposits (e.g., wells, privy pits, dumps). The following actions are promulgated in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and Health and Human Safety Code 7050.5, and pertain to the discovery of human remains. If human remains are encountered, excavation or disturbance of the location must be halted in the vicinity of the find, and the county coroner contacted. If the coroner determines the remains are Native American, the coroner will contact the Native American Heritage Commission. The Native American Heritage Commission will identify the person or persons believed to be most likely descended from the deceased Native American. The most likely descendent makes recommendations regarding the treatment of the remains with appropriate dignity. SUMMARY Tom Origer & Associates conducted a cultural resources study for seven potential development locations for the Cupertino General Plan Amendment, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California. The study was requested by Terri McCracken, The Planning Center | DC&E, in compliance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act. No
9 cultural resources were found within the survey areas, and no resource-specific recommendations are warranted. Documentation pertaining to this study is on file at the offices of Tom Origer & Associates (File No. 13-66). MATERIALS CONSULTED Bean, L. J. 1994 The Ohlone Past and Present: Native Americans of San Francisco Bay Region. Series ed. Sylvia Brakke Vane, Ballena Press Anthropological Papers no. 42: Menlo Park. Bolton, H. 1930 Font's Complete Diary Of The Second Anza Expedition. Anza's California Expeditions Volume IV. University of California Press: Berkeley. California History Center 1975 Cupertino Chronicle. Local History Studies: Volume 19. De Anza College: Cupertino. California Soil Resource Lab 2010 SoilWeb: An Online Soil Survey Browser. Website accessed 10 July 2013 for Google Earth interface. <http://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/drupal/node/902> Cartier, R. 1987 Cultural Resource Evaluation of the Calabazas Creek Flood Control Project in the Cities of Cupertino and Santa Clara, County of Santa Clara. Document S-9368 on file at the Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. Edwards, R. 1974 An Archaeological Reconnaissance of Calabazas Creek (From Lawrence Expressway to Wolfe Road) for the Santa Clara Valley Water District. Document S-4183 on file at the Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. Fredrickson, D. 1984 The North Coastal Region. In California Archaeology, edited by M. Moratto. Academic Press, San Francisco. General Land Office 1866 Plat of T7S;R2W. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 1864 Plat of the Quito landgrant. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Holman, M. 2001 Letter report to Judy Shanley regarding Archival Research and Field Inspection of the Proposed 25 Acres Compaq Computer Corporation Addition, Stevens Creek
10 Road, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California. Document S-25278 on file at the Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. Hoover, M., H. Rensch, E. Rensch, W. Abeloe 1966 Historic Spots in California. 3rd edition. Stanford University Press. Stanford. Hoover, M., H. Rensch, E. Rensch, W. Abeloe, and D. Kyle 1990 Historic Spots in California. 4th edition, Stanford University Press. Stanford. 2002 Historic Spots in California. 5th edition, Stanford University Press. Stanford. Jennings, C. and J. Burnett 1961 Geologic Map of California, San Francisco Sheet 1:250,000 scale. Division of Mines, San Francisco. Kinnard, L. 1966 History of the Greater San Francisco Bay Region. Lewis Historical Publishing Company: New York. Kroeber, A. 1925 Handbook of the Indians of California. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 78, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Levy, R. 1978 Costanoan. In California, edited by R. Heizer. Handbook of North American Indians, Vol. 8, W. Sturtevant, general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Losee, C. 2001 Letter report to Stephanie Wood regarding Record Search for Spring PCS "Vallco Mall" (Ref# SF56XC430-B): Negative Results. Document S-24566 on file at the Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. 2002 Letter report to Victoria Holland regarding Cultural Resources Analysis for Cingular Wireless's "Commerce One (Richwood)" Site (SF-922-02: Negative Results. Document S-26397 on file at the Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. 2012 Letter report to Steve Grist regarding Cultural Resources Investigation for Sprint SF25XC511 - Apple Campus, 19624 Homestead Road, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California, 95014. Document S-39579 on file at the Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. Margo lin, M. 1978 The Ohlone Way: Indian Life in the San Francisco-Monterey Bay Area. Heyday Books: Berkeley.
11 Milliken, R. 1995 A Time of Little Choice: The Disintegration of Tribal Cultural in the San Francisco Bay Area 1769-1810. Series ed. Thomas Blackburn, Ballena Press Anthropological Papers no. 43: Menlo Park Moratto, M. 1984 California Archaeology. Academic Press, San Francisco. Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) 1995 Instructions for Recording Historic Resources. Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento. 2011 Historic Property Directory. Office of Historic Preservation, Sacramento. Price, B. 1998a Letter report regarding Cultural Resources Assessment Pacific Bell Mobile Services Facility SF-569-02 Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California. Document S-20540 on file at the Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. 1998b Letter report to Heather Angelica regarding Cultural Resources Assessment Pacific Bell Mobile Services Facility SF-579-02 Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California. Document S-20544 on file at the Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. Psota, S. 1998 Letter report to Laure Kochian regarding Review of Historic Resources of the Built Environment for Site SF-559-01, Roof Mount at 1 Infinite Loop, Buildings 2 and 3, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, CA. Document S-20777 on file at the Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park. State of California Department of Parks and Recreation 1976 California Inventory of Historic Resources. Department of Parks and Recreation, Sacramento. Teixeira, L. 1997 The Costanoan/Ohlone Indians of the San Francisco and Monterey Bay Area: A Research Guide. Ballena Press: Menlo Park. Thompson and West 1876 Historical Atlas Map of Santa Clara County. T.H. Thompson & Co., Oakland, California. Trianon Foundation 1972 National Register of Historic Places Inventory - Nomination Form for Le Petit Trianon. Document S-4628 on file at the Northwest Information Center, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park.
12 United States Army of Corps Engineers 1940 Palo Alto 15’ quadrangle. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. United States Geological Survey 1899 Palo Alto 15’ quadrangle. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. 1953 Cupertino 7.5’ quadrangle. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. 1961a Cupertino 7.5’ quadrangle [photorevised 1980 edition]. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. 1961b Palo Alto 15’ quadrangle. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
APPENDIX A: Native American Contact
Native American Contact Efforts Cupertino General Plan Amendment, Santa Clara County Organization Contact Letters Results Native American Heritage Commission 7/9/13 No response received as of the date of this report.
........................................................................................................................
APPENDIX E:
NOISE DATA
........................................................................................................................
Short-Term Noise Measurements
Short-term Location 1
Short-term noise monitoring Location 1 is representative of noise generated by minor arterials in Cupertino, as
received by the commercial center and potential housing site at Foothill and Stevens Creek Boulevard. Existing
land uses in the vicinity of the location were low-intensity, auto-oriented commercial retail and office, as well as
single- and multi-family residential. This location was on the southwest corner of Foothill Boulevard and Stevens
Creek Boulevard, approximately 200 feet from centerline of Foothill Boulevard, and 70 feet from the centerline
of Stevens Creek Boulevard. The location was also approximately 1 mile to the west of SR 85, and 0.9 mile to the
south of I-280. Fifteen minutes of noise measurements were acquired, beginning at 9:38 a.m. on Wednesday, April
23, 2014. During measurements, winds were from the west-northwest at 5-10 miles per hour (mph) and the air
temperature was 59 degrees Fahrenheit.
The noise environment of Location 1 was characterized primarily by the sound of traffic along Stevens Creek
Boulevard and Foothill Boulevard; at times it was also possible to discern the sound of distant landscaping
equipment, and one passing aircraft was also noted. Truck traffic contributed substantially to the noise
environment at this location. The 15-minute equivalent noise level (Leq) at this location was 68.9 dBA.
Short-term Location 2
Short-term noise monitoring Location 2 is representative of noise generated by major arterials in Cupertino.
Existing land uses in the vicinity of the location included primarily low-intensity, auto-oriented commercial retail
and multi-family residential. This site was located on the southwest corner of Homestead Road and North De
Anza Boulevard, approximately 140 feet from centerline of Homestead Road, and 80 feet from the Centerline of
North De Anza Boulevard. The location was also approximately 1,070 feet to the north of the centerline of I-280.
Fifteen minutes of noise measurements were acquired, beginning at 11:29 a.m. on Wednesday, April 23, 2014.
During measurements, winds were from the northwest at 5-10 mph, with occasional gusts to 15 mph and the air
temperature was 65 degrees Fahrenheit.
The noise environment of Location 2 was characterized primarily by the sound of traffic along North De Anza
Boulevard and, to a lesser extent, Homestead Road; occasional noise from passing buses, car door slams, and
engine starts was also noted. During the measurement period, no noise from passing aircraft was noted. The 15-
minute equivalent noise level (Leq) at this location was 68.8 dBA.
Short-term Location 3
Short-term noise monitoring Location 3 is representative of noise generated by major arterials in Cupertino, as
received at a potential housing site. Existing land uses in the vicinity of the location included a mix of low-
intensity, auto-oriented commercial retain and office; single-family residential; and multi-family residential. This
location was on the southwest corner of South De Anza Boulevard and Wildflower Way, approximately 75 feet
from centerline of South De Anza Boulevard, and 36 feet from the centerline of Wildflower Way. The location was
also approximately 730 feet to the southwest of the centerline of SR 85. Fifteen minutes of noise measurements
were acquired, beginning at 5:55 p.m. on Tuesday, April 22, 2014. During measurements, winds were from the
west 5-10 mph and the air temperature was 63 degrees Fahrenheit.
The noise environment of Location 3 was characterized primarily by the sound of traffic along South De Anza
Boulevard and it was also possible at times to discern the sound of traffic along SR 85. During the measurement
period, no noise from passing aircraft was noted. The 15-minute equivalent noise level (Leq) at this location was
71.4 dBA.
Short-term Location 4
Short-term noise monitoring Location 4 is representative of noise generated by collector streets and highways in
Cupertino, as received by the potential housing site along Mary Avenue. Existing land uses in the vicinity of the
location were low-intensity, auto-oriented commercial retail and office, as well as multi-family residential and
recreational uses. This location was along the 10100 block of Mary Avenue on the north side of the street,
approximately 50 feet from centerline of Mary Avenue, and 38 feet from the centerline of a driveway providing
access to Cupertino Memorial Park. The location was also approximately 1,136 feet to the west of the centerline
of SR 85, and 0.7 miles to the south of I-280. Fifteen minutes of noise measurements were acquired, beginning at
10:34 a.m. on Wednesday, April 23, 2014. During measurements, winds were light and variable and the air
temperature was 62 degrees Fahrenheit.
The noise environment of Location 4 was characterized primarily by the sound of traffic along SR 85, Stevens
Creek Boulevard, and Mary Avenue; it was also possible at times to discern the sound of birds and distant power
tools and landscaping equipment. One passing aircraft was also noted. The 15-minute equivalent noise level (Leq)
at this location was 58.4 dBA.
Short-term Location 5
Short-term noise monitoring Location 5 is representative of noise generated by collector streets and major
arterials in Cupertino, as received by the potential housing site along North Stelling Road near Homestead Road.
Existing land uses in the vicinity of the location were low-intensity, auto-oriented commercial retail and office, as
well as multi-family residential and institutional uses. This location was in front of the student center parking lot
on the 10800 block of North Stelling Road. The monitoring equipment were located west side of the street,
approximately 60 feet from centerline of North Stelling Road, and 496 feet from the centerline Homestead Road.
The location was also approximately 1 mile to the east of SR 85, and 672 feet to the north of the centerline of I-
280. Fifteen minutes of noise measurements were acquired, beginning at 11:08 a.m. on Wednesday, April 23,
2014. During measurements, winds were light and variable and the air temperature was 65 degrees Fahrenheit.
The noise environment of Location 5 was characterized primarily by the sound of traffic along North Stelling
Road and Homestead Road; at times it was also possible to discern the sound of birds and traffic along I-280. No
noise from aircraft was noted during the measurement period. The 15-minute equivalent noise level (Leq) at this
location was 67.4 dBA.
Short-term Location 6
Short-term noise monitoring Location 6 is representative of noise generated by major employment uses in
Cupertino, and also represents noise generated by major highways as it could impact potential housing sites.
Existing land uses in the vicinity of the location included primarily low-intensity, auto-oriented office uses, with
some nearby single- and multi-family residential. This location was on the north side of Valley Green Drive, just
east of its intersection with Beardon Drive, approximately 34 feet from centerline of Valley Green Drive. The
location was also approximately 740 feet to the south of the centerline of I-280. Fifteen minutes of noise
measurements were acquired, beginning at 11:56 a.m. on Wednesday, April 23, 2014. During measurements,
winds were from the north at 5-10 mph and the air temperature was 66 degrees Fahrenheit.
The noise environment of Location 6 was characterized primarily by the sound of traffic along Valley Green Drive
and I-280, as well as by noise from building mechanical equipment associated with nearby employment uses.
Occasional noise from birds, human conversation, car door slams, and engine starts was also noted. During the
measurement period, some limited noise from passing aircraft was also noted. The 15-minute equivalent noise
level (Leq) at this location was 61.6 dBA.
Short-term Location 7
Short-term noise monitoring Location 7 is representative of noise generated major arterials in Cupertino, as
received at potential housing sites along Stevens Creek Boulevard. Existing land uses in the vicinity of the location
included a mix of low-intensity, auto-oriented commercial office and retail uses, multi-family residential, and
mixed-use. This location was at 20045 Stevens Creek Boulevard, on the north side of the roadway, just west of its
intersection with Blaney Avenue. The monitoring equipment was placed approximately 68 feet from centerline of
Stevens Creek Boulevard, and 300 feet from the centerline of Blaney Avenue. The location was also approximately
0.8 miles to the south of I-280. Fifteen minutes of noise measurements were acquired, beginning at 12:37 p.m. on
Wednesday, April 23, 2014. During measurements, winds were from the northwest at 5-10 mph, and the air
temperature was 66 degrees Fahrenheit.
The noise environment of Location 7 was characterized primarily by the sound of traffic along Steven Creek
Boulevard and, to a lesser extent, traffic on Blaney Avenue. Noise from distant construction equipment, human
conversation, car door slams, and engine starts was also occasionally discernible. During the measurement period,
no aircraft noise was noted. The 15-minute equivalent noise level (Leq) at this location was 67.9 dBA.
Short-term Location 8
Short-term noise monitoring Location 8 is representative of noise generated by major arterials and highways in
Cupertino, as received at the boundary of the Bubb Road and Monta Vista Special Centers. Existing land uses in
the vicinity of the location were primarily low-intensity commercial office, with one restaurant and some single-
family uses nearby. This location was on the northeast corner of Bubb Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard,
approximately 62 feet from centerline of Bubb Road, and 68 feet from the centerline of Stevens Creek Boulevard.
The location was also approximately 550 feet to the west of the centerline of SR 85, and 0.7 miles to the south of
the centerline of I-280. Fifteen minutes of noise measurements were acquired, beginning at 10:07 a.m. on
Wednesday, April 23, 2014. During measurements, winds were light and variable and the air temperature was 60
degrees Fahrenheit.
The noise environment of Location 8 was characterized primarily by the sound of traffic along Bubb Road and
Stevens Creek Boulevard; it was also possible at times to discern the sound of traffic along nearby highways SR 85
and I-280. The 15-minute equivalent noise level (Leq) at this location was 68.0 dBA.
Short-term Location 9
Short-term noise monitoring Location 9 is representative of noise generated major arterials and highways in
Cupertino, as received at potential housing sites along Wolfe Road. Existing land uses in the vicinity of the location
included low-intensity commercial, hotels, and multi-family residential. This location was at 10741 Wolfe Road,
on the west side of the roadway, just north of its intersection with I-280. The monitoring equipment were placed
60 feet from centerline of Wolfe Road, and 350 feet from the terminus of Pruneridge Avenue. The location was
also approximately 760 feet to the northeast of the centerline of I-280. Fifteen minutes of noise measurements
were acquired, beginning at 1:16 p.m. on Wednesday, April 23, 2014. During measurements, winds were from the
north at 5-10 mph, with occasional gusts up to 15 mph and the air temperature was 67 degrees Fahrenheit.
The noise environment of Location 9 was characterized primarily by the sound of traffic along Wolfe Roade and I-
280, as well as construction equipment at multiple nearby sites to the north and east. During the measurement
period, occasional aircraft also contributed to the noise environment. The 15-minute equivalent noise level (Leq) at
this location was 67.6 dBA.
Short-term Location 10
Shor t-term noise monitoring Location 10 is representative of noise generated by local neighborhood streets in
Cupertino, as received by single-family homes. Existing land uses in the vicinity of the location were exclusively
single-family residential. This location was on the southeast corner of the intersection of Barnhart Avenue and
Wunderlich Street. The monitoring equipment were placed 36 feet from centerline of Barnhart Avenue, and 40
feet from the centerline of Wunderlich Street. The location was also approximately 0.4 miles to the southwest of
I-280. Fifteen minutes of noise measurements were acquired, beginning at 1:51 p.m. on Wednesday, April 23,
2014. During measurements, winds were from the north-northeast at 5-10 mph, with occasional gusts up to 15
mph, and the air temperature was 67 degrees Fahrenheit.
The noise environment of Location 10 was characterized primarily by the sound of passing vehicles along
Wunderlich Street and, to a lesser extent, Barnhart Avenue. Other notable noise sources included birds chirping,
the sound of rustling leaves, and occasional noise from distant landscaping equipment. During the measurement
period, no noise from aircraft was noted. The 15-minute equivalent noise level (Leq) at this location was 58.5 dBA.
Short-term Location 11
Short-term noise monitoring Location 11 is representative of noise generated by major arterials in Cupertino.
Existing land uses in the vicinity of the location included primarily low-intensity, auto-oriented commercial retail
with some limited office uses. This site was located on the southwest corner of McClellan Road and South De
Anza Boulevard, 100 feet from centerline of McClellan Road, and 74 feet from the Centerline of South De Anza
Boulevard. The location was also approximately two-thirds mile to the northeast of SR 85. Fifteen minutes of
noise measurements were acquired, beginning at 5:07 p.m. on Tuesday, April 22, 2014. During measurements,
winds were from the west-northwest at 5-10 mph, with gusts to 12 mph, and the air temperature was 64 degrees
Fahrenheit.
The noise environment of Location 11 was characterized primarily by the sound of traffic along South De Anza
Boulevard and McClellan Road; occasional noise from passing buses, car door slams, and engine starts was also
noted. During the measurement period, no noise from passing aircraft was noted. The 15-minute equivalent noise
level (Leq) at this location was 70.9 dBA.
Short-term Location 12
Short-term noise monitoring Location 12 is representative of noise generated by collector streets in Cupertino, as
received by single-family residential neighborhoods. Existing land uses in the vicinity of the location were
exclusively single-family residential. This location was on the northwest corner of Bubb Road and Conradia Court,
approximately 40 feet from centerline of Bubb Road, and 38 feet from the centerline of Conradia Court. The
location was also approximately two-thirds mile to the southwest of the centerline of SR 85. Fifteen minutes of
noise measurements were acquired, beginning at 8:37 a.m. on Wednesday, April 23, 2014. During measurements,
winds were from the west 5-10 mph and the air temperature was 58 degrees Fahrenheit.
The noise environment of Location 12 was characterized primarily by the sound of traffic along Bubb Road and,
to a lesser extent, traffic along Rainbow Drive; it was also possible at times to discern the sound of birds. The 15-
minute equivalent noise level (Leq) at this location was 64.2 dBA.
Short-term Location 13
Short-term noise monitoring Location 13 is representative of noise generated by minor arterials and recreational
uses in Cupertino. Existing land uses in the vicinity of the location included single-family residential, with the
recreational use of Jollyman Park located across from the monitoring location. This location was on the northwest
corner of Stelling Road and Carriage Circle, approximately 44 feet from centerline of Stelling Road, and 42 feet
from the centerline of Carriage Circle. The location was also approximately 460 feet to the northeast of the
centerline of SR 85. Fifteen minutes of noise measurements were acquired, beginning at 5:35 p.m. on Tuesday,
April 22, 2014. During measurements, winds were from the west-northwest at 5-10 mph and the air temperature
was 66 degrees Fahrenheit.
The noise environment of Location 13 was characterized primarily by the sound of traffic along Stelling Road. It
was possible to briefly discern the sound of children at play in Jollyman Park; h owever,the sound of passing
vehicles consistently dominated the noise environment. During the measurement period, no noise from passing
aircraft was noted. The 15-minute equivalent noise level (Leq) at this location was 67.3 dBA.
Long-Term Noise Measurement Locations
Long-Term Location 1
Long-term noise monitoring Location 1 represents the noise environment in the vicinity of the Vallco Shopping
Center, a General Plan Special Center, by capturing noise generated by activity along Stevens Creek Boulevard and
North Wolfe Road. Existing land uses in the vicinity of this location include office, retail, restaurants, single- and
multi-family residential, and mixed-use. This location was at 19450 Stevens Creek Boulevard, near its intersection
with Wolfe Road, 60 feet from the centerline of Stevens Creek Boulevard. This location was 2,280 feet southwest
of I-280. Noise level data over a 24 hour period were acquired, beginning at 4:10 p.m. on Tuesday April 22, 2014.
Over the 24-hour measurement period, winds were from the northwest at 5–10 mph and the air temperature
ranged from approximately 47 degrees Fahrenheit to 67 degrees Fahrenheit.
The noise environment of Long-term Location 1 was a characterized by a mix of noise sources, including cars,
trucks, service vehicles, transit, pedestrians, cyclists, voices, and other activities associated with adjacent
commercial uses. The 24-hour Day Night Noise Level (Ldn) at this location was 69.1 dBA. The highest and lowest
hourly Leq levels observed at this location were, respectively, 69.6 dBA during the period of 3:00 to 5:00 p.m.,
and 49.8 dBA during the 3:00 a.m. hour. A time history chart of the hourly data for Long-Term Location 1 is
included in this Appendix.
Long-Term Location 2
Long-term noise monitoring Location 2 represents the noise environment in the vicinity of North De Anza
Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard (the North De Anza Special center under the General Plan) by capturing
noise generated by traffic, primarily along Stevens Creek Boulevard and De Anza Boulevard. Existing land uses in
the vicinity of this location include office, retail, civic uses, and single-family residential. This location was near the
southwest corner of De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard, approximately 68 feet from the centerline
of De Anza Boulevard and 350 feet from the centerline of Stevens Creek Boulevard. This location was
approximately 0.9 miles from I-280 and 1.0 miles from SR 85. 24 hours of noise measurements were acquired,
beginning at 4:45 p.m. on Tuesday April 22, 2014. Over the 24-hour measurement period, winds were from the
northwest at 5–10 mph and the air temperature ranged from approximately 47 degrees Fahrenheit to 67 degrees
Fahrenheit.
The noise environment of Location 2 was dominated by the sound of traffic along Stevens Creek Boulevard and
De Anza Boulevard. Other noise sources included activity associated with nearby retail stores, including car doors,
engine starts, and human conversation. The 24-hour Day Night Noise Level (Ldn) at this location was 72.3 dBA.
The highest and lowest hourly Leq levels observed at this location were, respectively, 73.3 dBA during the 5:00
p.m. hour, and 56.4 dBA during the 2:00 a.m. hour. A time history chart of the hourly data for Long-Term
Location 2 is included in this Appendix.
Si
t
e
N
a
m
e
:
LT
-
1
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
o
n
e
-
h
o
u
r
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
24
Un
w
e
i
g
h
t
e
d
Leq
:
66
.
7
CN
E
L
:
69
.
7
LD
N
:
69
.
1
Ho
u
r
T
i
m
e
Leq
CN
E
L
P
e
n
a
l
t
y
Ad
j
.
Leq
LD
N
P
e
n
a
l
t
y
Ad
j
.
L
e
q
S
i
t
e
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
1
2
0
:
0
0
6
6
.
7
5
7
1
.
7
0
6
6
.
7
2
2
1
:
0
0
6
5
.
4
5
7
0
.
4
0
6
5
.
4
3
2
2
:
0
0
6
4
.
0
1
0
7
4
.
0
1
0
7
4
.
0
4
2
3
:
0
0
6
0
.
9
1
0
7
0
.
9
1
0
7
0
.
9
5
0
:
0
0
5
7
.
0
1
0
6
7
.
0
1
0
6
7
.
0
6
1
:
0
0
5
5
.
4
1
0
6
5
.
4
1
0
6
5
.
4
7
2
:
0
0
5
4
.
8
1
0
6
4
.
8
1
0
6
4
.
8
8
3
:
0
0
4
9
.
8
1
0
5
9
.
8
1
0
5
9
.
8
9
4
:
0
0
5
2
.
5
1
0
6
2
.
5
1
0
6
2
.
5
10
5
:
0
0
5
9
.
0
1
0
6
9
.
0
1
0
6
9
.
0
11
6
:
0
0
6
5
.
1
1
0
7
5
.
1
1
0
7
5
.
1
12
7
:
0
0
6
6
.
8
0
6
6
.
8
0
6
6
.
8
13
8
:
0
0
6
8
.
3
0
6
8
.
3
0
6
8
.
3
14
9
:
0
0
6
8
.
4
0
6
8
.
4
0
6
8
.
4
15
1
0
:
0
0
6
8
.
6
0
6
8
.
6
0
6
8
.
6
16
1
1
:
0
0
6
8
.
5
0
6
8
.
5
0
6
8
.
5
17
1
2
:
0
0
6
9
.
0
0
6
9
.
0
0
6
9
.
0
18
1
3
:
0
0
6
9
.
5
0
6
9
.
5
0
6
9
.
5
19
1
4
:
0
0
6
8
.
6
0
6
8
.
6
0
6
8
.
6
20
1
5
:
0
0
6
8
.
6
0
6
8
.
6
0
6
8
.
6
21
1
6
:
0
0
6
9
.
6
0
6
9
.
6
0
6
9
.
6
22
1
7
:
0
0
6
9
.
6
0
6
9
.
6
0
6
9
.
6
23
1
8
:
0
0
6
9
.
1
0
6
9
.
1
0
6
9
.
1
24
1
9
:
0
0
6
7
.
5
5
7
2
.
5
0
6
7
.
5
Lo
n
g
-
t
e
r
m
n
o
i
s
e
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
1
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s
t
h
e
n
o
i
s
e
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
i
n
th
e
v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
S
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
C
e
n
t
e
r
,
a
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
C
e
n
t
e
r
,
b
y
ca
p
t
u
r
i
n
g
n
o
i
s
e
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
b
y
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
a
l
o
n
g
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
No
r
t
h
W
o
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
c
a
r
s
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
,
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
,
b
i
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
,
a
n
d
a
r
e
a
bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
.
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
i
s
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
,
re
t
a
i
l
,
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
,
s
i
n
g
l
e
-
a
n
d
m
u
l
t
i
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
a
n
d
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
.
T
h
i
s
lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
w
a
s
s
i
t
e
d
a
t
1
9
4
5
0
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
n
e
a
r
i
t
s
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
Wo
l
f
e
R
a
o
d
,
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
6
0
f
e
e
t
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
o
f
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
.
T
h
i
s
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
w
a
s
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
2
,
2
8
0
f
e
e
t
s
o
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
o
f
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
28
0
.
2
4
h
o
u
r
s
o
f
n
o
i
s
e
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
e
r
e
a
c
q
u
i
r
e
d
,
b
e
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
a
t
4
:
1
0
p
.
m
.
on
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
A
p
r
i
l
2
2
,
2
0
1
4
.
O
v
e
r
t
h
e
2
4
-
h
o
u
r
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
p
e
r
i
o
d
,
w
i
n
d
s
w
e
r
e
fr
o
m
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
a
t
5
–
1
0
m
p
h
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
a
i
r
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
r
a
n
g
e
d
f
r
o
m
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
4
7
°
F
t
o
6
7
°
F
.
LT
-
1
H
i
s
t
r
o
g
r
a
m
66
.
7
65
.
4
64
.
0
60
.
9
57
.
0
55
.
4
54
.
8
49
.
8
52
.
5
59
.
0
65
.
1
66
.
8
68
.
3
68
.
4
68
.
6
68
.
5
69
.
0
69
.
5
68
.
6
68
.
6
69.669.669.1 67.5
0.
0
10
.
0
20
.
0
30
.
0
40
.
0
50
.
0
60
.
0
70
.
0
80
.
0
20
:
0
0
2
1
:
0
0
2
2
:
0
0
2
3
:
0
0
0
:
0
0
1
:
0
0
2
:
0
0
3
:
0
0
4
:
0
0
5
:
0
0
6
:
0
0
7
:
0
0
8
:
0
0
9
:
0
0
1
0
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
1
2
:
0
0
1
3
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
8
:
0
0
1
9
:
0
0
Leq
Ti
m
e
(
2
4
-
h
o
u
r
f
o
r
m
a
t
)
Lo
n
g
T
e
r
m
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
S
i
t
e
1
Si
t
e
N
a
m
e
:
LT
-
2
Nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
o
n
e
-
h
o
u
r
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
24
Un
w
e
i
g
h
t
e
d
Leq
:
69
.
8
CN
E
L
:
73
.
0
LD
N
:
72
.
3
Ho
u
r
T
i
m
e
Leq
CN
E
L
P
e
n
a
l
t
y
Ad
j
.
Leq
LD
N
P
e
n
a
l
t
y
Ad
j
.
L
e
q
S
i
t
e
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
1
2
0
:
0
0
7
0
.
2
5
7
5
.
2
0
7
0
.
2
2
2
1
:
0
0
6
8
.
8
5
7
3
.
8
0
6
8
.
8
3
2
2
:
0
0
6
6
.
5
1
0
7
6
.
5
1
0
7
6
.
5
4
2
3
:
0
0
6
4
.
6
1
0
7
4
.
6
1
0
7
4
.
6
5
0
:
0
0
6
1
.
4
1
0
7
1
.
4
1
0
7
1
.
4
6
1
:
0
0
5
8
.
5
1
0
6
8
.
5
1
0
6
8
.
5
7
2
:
0
0
5
6
.
4
1
0
6
6
.
4
1
0
6
6
.
4
8
3
:
0
0
5
6
.
5
1
0
6
6
.
5
1
0
6
6
.
5
9
4
:
0
0
6
0
.
6
1
0
7
0
.
6
1
0
7
0
.
6
10
5
:
0
0
6
4
.
6
1
0
7
4
.
6
1
0
7
4
.
6
11
6
:
0
0
6
7
.
7
1
0
7
7
.
7
1
0
7
7
.
7
12
7
:
0
0
7
0
.
5
0
7
0
.
5
0
7
0
.
5
13
8
:
0
0
7
1
.
4
0
7
1
.
4
0
7
1
.
4
14
9
:
0
0
7
1
.
4
0
7
1
.
4
0
7
1
.
4
15
1
0
:
0
0
7
0
.
8
0
7
0
.
8
0
7
0
.
8
16
1
1
:
0
0
7
1
.
0
0
7
1
.
0
0
7
1
.
0
17
1
2
:
0
0
7
1
.
3
0
7
1
.
3
0
7
1
.
3
18
1
3
:
0
0
7
1
.
0
0
7
1
.
0
0
7
1
.
0
19
1
4
:
0
0
7
1
.
3
0
7
1
.
3
0
7
1
.
3
20
1
5
:
0
0
7
1
.
9
0
7
1
.
9
0
7
1
.
9
21
1
6
:
0
0
7
2
.
5
0
7
2
.
5
0
7
2
.
5
22
1
7
:
0
0
7
3
.
3
0
7
3
.
3
0
7
3
.
3
23
1
8
:
0
0
7
3
.
1
0
7
3
.
1
0
7
3
.
1
24
1
9
:
0
0
7
1
.
6
5
7
6
.
6
0
7
1
.
6
Lo
n
g
-
t
e
r
m
n
o
i
s
e
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
2
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
s
t
h
e
n
o
i
s
e
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
i
n
th
e
v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
o
f
N
o
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
t
h
e
No
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
)
b
y
c
a
p
t
u
r
i
n
g
n
o
i
s
e
ge
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
b
y
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
,
p
r
i
m
a
r
i
l
y
a
l
o
n
g
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
.
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
v
i
c
i
n
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
i
s
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
,
re
t
a
i
l
,
c
i
v
i
c
u
s
e
s
,
a
n
d
s
i
n
g
l
e
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
.
T
h
i
s
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
w
a
s
s
i
t
e
d
n
e
a
r
t
h
e
so
u
t
h
w
e
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
6
8
f
e
e
t
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
o
f
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
3
5
0
f
e
e
t
fr
o
m
t
h
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
o
f
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
.
T
h
i
s
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
w
a
s
ap
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
0
.
9
m
i
l
e
s
f
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
a
n
d
1
.
0
m
i
l
e
s
f
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
.
2
4
h
o
u
r
s
of
n
o
i
s
e
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
e
r
e
a
c
q
u
i
r
e
d
,
b
e
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
a
t
4
:
4
5
p
.
m
.
o
n
T
u
e
s
d
a
y
Ap
r
i
l
2
2
,
2
0
1
4
.
O
v
e
r
t
h
e
2
4
-
h
o
u
r
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
p
e
r
i
o
d
,
w
i
n
d
s
w
e
r
e
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
no
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
a
t
5
–
1
0
m
p
h
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
a
i
r
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
r
a
n
g
e
d
f
r
o
m
a
p
p
r
o
x
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
47
°
F
t
o
6
7
°
F
.
LT
-
2
H
i
s
t
r
o
g
r
a
m
70
.
2
68
.
8
66
.
5
64
.
6
61
.
4
58
.
5
56
.
4
56
.
5
60
.
6
64
.
6
67
.
7
70
.
5
71
.
4
7
1
.
4
70
.
8
71
.
0
71
.
3
71
.
0
71
.
3
71
.
9
72.573.373.171.6
0.
0
10
.
0
20
.
0
30
.
0
40
.
0
50
.
0
60
.
0
70
.
0
80
.
0
20
:
0
0
2
1
:
0
0
2
2
:
0
0
2
3
:
0
0
0
:
0
0
1
:
0
0
2
:
0
0
3
:
0
0
4
:
0
0
5
:
0
0
6
:
0
0
7
:
0
0
8
:
0
0
9
:
0
0
1
0
:
0
0
1
1
:
0
0
1
2
:
0
0
1
3
:
0
0
1
4
:
0
0
1
5
:
0
0
1
6
:
0
0
1
7
:
0
0
1
8
:
0
0
1
9
:
0
0
Leq
Ti
m
e
(
2
4
-
h
o
u
r
f
o
r
m
a
t
)
Lo
n
g
T
e
r
m
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
S
i
t
e
2
Site:ST-1 Start date:4/23/2014
Number of one-minute measurements:15 Start time:9:38 AM
Average Leq:68.9 Long-term 15-min LEQ:0.0
Estimated ST-1 Ldn:68.9 Long-term 24-hour Ldn:
Minute Leq MinuteLeq
166.3
274.9
372.5
467.7
571.8
662.2
764
863.8
963.9
1062.3
1172
1266.5
1364.9
1465.4
1565.5
Site:ST-2 Start date:4/23/2014
Number of one-minute measurements:15 Start time:11:29 AM
Average Leq:68.8 Long-term 15-min LEQ:0.0
Estimated ST-2 Ldn:68.8 Long-term 24-hour Ldn:
Minute Leq MinuteLeq
169.1
265.8
369.5
470.1
568.1
669.8
766.4
871.9
966.3
1068.6
1164.5
1272.1
1367.8
1466.7
1568
Site:ST-3 Start date:4/22/2014
Number of one-minute measurements:15 Start time:5:57 PM
Average Leq:71.4 Long-term 15-min LEQ:0.0
Estimated ST-3 Ldn:71.4 Long-term 24-hour Ldn:
Minute Leq MinuteLeq
168.2
276.5
372.8
472.2
570.1
668.3
769.4
870.4
972.2
1071.1
1169.7
1271.1
1367
1473
1569.4
Site:ST-4 Start date:4/23/2014
Number of one-minute measurements:15 Start time:10:34 AM
Average Leq:58.4 Long-term 15-min LEQ:0.0
Estimated ST-4 Ldn:58.4 Long-term 24-hour Ldn:
Minute Leq MinuteLeq
160.8
259.4
353.3
457.4
557.1
657.2
756.9
857.4
954.1
1059.7
1158
1258.2
1363.5
1456
1554.8
Site:ST-5 Start date:4/23/2014
Number of one-minute measurements:15 Start time:11:08 AM
Average Leq:67.4 Long-term 15-min LEQ:0.0
Estimated ST-4 Ldn:67.4 Long-term 24-hour Ldn:
Minute Leq MinuteLeq
167
266.3
367.9
464.8
568
664.4
768
867.2
968.2
1068.8
1169.7
1267.1
1367.9
1466.9
1566.6
Site:ST-6 Start date:4/23/2014
Number of one-minute measurements:15 Start time:11:56 AM
Average Leq:61.6 Long-term 15-min LEQ:0.0
Estimated ST-4 Ldn:61.6 Long-term 24-hour Ldn:
Minute Leq MinuteLeq
162.2
257.2
360.5
461.5
555.4
658.2
760.6
861.8
961.3
1060.6
1160.8
1268.3
1358.2
1460.7
1560
Site:ST-7 Start date:4/23/2014
Number of one-minute measurements:15 Start time:12:37 PM
Average Leq:67.9 Long-term 15-min LEQ:0.0
Estimated ST-4 Ldn:67.9 Long-term 24-hour Ldn:
Minute Leq MinuteLeq
164.5
270
365.1
471.2
569
670.1
763.4
868.6
965.1
1068.5
1163.5
1268.7
1361.5
1471
1562.5
Site:ST-8 Start date:4/23/2014
Number of one-minute measurements:15 Start time:10:07 AM
Average Leq:68.0 Long-term 15-min LEQ:0.0
Estimated ST-4 Ldn:68.0 Long-term 24-hour Ldn:0.0
Minute Leq MinuteLeq
167.9
267.7
363.3
466.5
563.2
667.2
767.5
868.5
964
1069.1
1165
1266.8
1369.2
1472.1
1571
Site:ST-9 Start date:4/23/2014
Number of one-minute measurements:15 Start time:1:16 PM
Average Leq:67.6 Long-term 15-min LEQ:0.0
Estimated ST-4 Ldn:67.6 Long-term 24-hour Ldn:
Minute Leq MinuteLeq
166.7
269.1
367.5
465.4
568.3
663.7
766.8
868.6
968
1066.8
1170
1265.5
1369
1464.7
1568.3
Site:ST-10 Start date:4/23/2014
Number of one-minute measurements:15 Start time:1:51 PM
Average Leq:58.5 Long-term 15-min LEQ:0.0
Estimated ST-4 Ldn:58.5 Long-term 24-hour Ldn:
Minute Leq MinuteLeq
162.1
258.6
355.6
455
554.8
656.5
758
861.5
963.2
1056.4
1157
1257.8
1357.5
1455.3
1555.1
Site:ST-11 Start date:4/22/2014
Number of one-minute measurements:15 Start time:5:07 PM
Average Leq:70.9 Long-term 15-min LEQ:0.0
Estimated ST-4 Ldn:70.9 Long-term 24-hour Ldn:
Minute Leq MinuteLeq
167.4
273.2
366.6
472
569.6
671.6
770.7
867.6
973.4
1072.4
1172.2
1269
1370.7
1471.5
1568.3
Site:ST-12 Start date:4/23/2014
Number of one-minute measurements:15 Start time:8:37 AM
Average Leq:64.2 Long-term 15-min LEQ:0.0
Estimated ST-4 Ldn:64.2 Long-term 24-hour Ldn:
Minute Leq MinuteLeq
160.5
257.3
356.6
460.8
559.8
663.4
765.4
865.6
965.4
1065.9
1165.4
1266.3
1366.1
1465.4
1564.9
Site:ST-13 Start date:4/22/2014
Number of one-minute measurements:15 Start time:5:35 PM
Average Leq:67.3 Long-term 15-min LEQ:0.0
Estimated ST-4 Ldn:67.3 Long-term 24-hour Ldn:
Minute Leq MinuteLeq
165.9
267.6
366.3
467.1
568
667.9
766.5
866.4
967
1066.7
1168.5
1267.2
1366.7
1468.6
1567.8
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
F
r
e
i
g
h
t
R
a
i
l
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
No
i
s
e
M
o
d
e
l
B
a
s
e
d
o
n
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
A
d
m
i
n
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
N
o
i
s
e
A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
De
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
f
o
r
C
h
i
c
a
g
o
C
r
e
a
t
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Co
p
y
r
i
g
h
t
2
0
0
6
,
H
M
M
H
I
n
c
.
Ca
s
e
:
No
i
s
e
S
o
u
r
c
e
Al
l
S
o
u
r
c
e
s
So
u
r
c
e
1
So
u
r
c
e
2
So
u
r
c
e
3
So
u
r
c
e
4
So
u
r
c
e
5
So
u
r
c
e
6
So
u
r
c
e
7
So
u
r
c
e
8
En
t
e
r
n
o
i
s
e
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
r
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
c
a
t
e
g
o
r
y
b
e
l
o
w
.
2
En
t
e
r
d
a
t
a
f
o
r
u
p
t
o
8
n
o
i
s
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
b
e
l
o
w
-
s
e
e
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
l
i
s
t
f
o
r
s
o
u
r
c
e
n
u
m
b
e
r
s
.
NO
I
S
E
S
O
U
R
C
E
P
A
R
A
M
E
T
E
R
S
Pa
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
So
u
r
c
e
N
u
m
.
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
L
o
c
o
m
o
t
i
v
e
9
F
r
e
i
g
h
t
C
a
r
s
1
0
Di
s
t
a
n
c
e
(
s
o
u
r
c
e
t
o
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
r
)
di
s
t
a
n
c
e
(
f
t
)
1
0
0
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
(
f
t
)
1
0
0
Da
y
t
i
m
e
H
o
u
r
s
sp
e
e
d
(
m
p
h
)
4
0
s
p
e
e
d
(
m
p
h
)
4
0
(7
A
M
-
1
0
P
M
)
tr
a
i
n
s
/
h
o
u
r
0
.
0
5
7
t
r
a
i
n
s
/
h
o
u
r
0
.
0
5
7
lo
c
o
s
/
t
r
a
i
n
2
l
e
n
g
t
h
o
f
c
a
r
s
(
f
t
)
/
t
r
a
i
n
1
3
0
0
Ni
g
h
t
t
i
m
e
H
o
u
r
s
sp
e
e
d
(
m
p
h
)
0
s
p
e
e
d
(
m
p
h
)
0
(1
0
P
M
-
7
A
M
)
tr
a
i
n
s
/
h
o
u
r
0
t
r
a
i
n
s
/
h
o
u
r
0
lo
c
o
s
/
t
r
a
i
n
0
l
e
n
g
t
h
o
f
c
a
r
s
(
f
t
)
/
t
r
a
i
n
0
Wh
e
e
l
F
l
a
t
s
?
0.
0
0
%
%
o
f
c
a
r
s
w
/
w
h
e
e
l
f
l
a
t
s
0
.
0
0
%
Jo
i
n
t
e
d
T
r
a
c
k
?
Y/
N
N
Y
/
N
n
Em
b
e
d
d
e
d
T
r
a
c
k
?
Y/
N
N
Y
/
N
n
Ae
r
i
a
l
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
?
Y/
N
N
Y
/
N
n
Ba
r
r
i
e
r
P
r
e
s
e
n
t
?
Y/
N
N
Y
/
N
n
In
t
e
r
v
e
n
i
n
g
R
o
w
s
o
f
o
f
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
r
o
w
s
0
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
r
o
w
s
0
So
u
r
c
e
N
u
m
b
e
r
No
t
e
s
:
Co
m
m
u
t
e
r
E
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
L
o
c
o
m
o
t
i
v
e
1
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
f
u
t
u
r
e
r
a
i
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
b
a
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
l
e
v
e
l
s
a
n
d
f
u
t
u
r
e
Co
m
m
u
t
e
r
D
i
e
s
e
l
L
o
c
o
m
o
t
i
v
e
2
f
r
e
i
g
h
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
:
Co
m
m
u
t
e
r
R
a
i
l
C
a
r
s
3
RR
T
/
L
R
T
4
T
U
L
A
R
E
C
O
U
N
T
Y
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
P
L
A
N
2
0
3
0
U
P
D
A
T
E
,
AG
T
,
S
t
e
e
l
W
h
e
e
l
5
R
e
c
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
D
r
a
f
t
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
I
m
p
a
c
t
R
e
p
o
r
t
,
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
0
AG
T
,
R
u
b
b
e
r
T
i
r
e
6
S
C
H
#
2
0
0
6
0
4
1
1
6
2
Mo
n
o
r
a
i
l
7
Ma
g
l
e
v
8
CA
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
I
N
T
E
R
-
R
E
G
I
O
N
A
L
IN
T
E
R
M
O
D
A
L
S
Y
S
T
E
M
(
C
I
R
I
S
)
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
Ex
e
c
u
t
i
v
e
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
L
o
c
o
m
o
t
i
v
e
9
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
S
a
n
J
o
a
q
u
i
n
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
o
f
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
s
b
y
Fr
e
i
g
h
t
C
a
r
s
1
0
T
h
e
T
i
o
g
a
G
r
o
u
p
,
I
n
c
.
Ho
p
p
e
r
C
a
r
s
(
e
m
p
t
y
)
1
1
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
Ho
p
p
e
r
C
a
r
s
(
f
u
l
l
)
1
2
C
a
m
b
r
i
d
g
e
S
y
s
t
e
m
a
t
i
c
s
,
I
n
c
.
Cr
o
s
s
o
v
e
r
1
3
J
u
n
e
1
1
2
0
0
6
Au
t
o
m
o
b
i
l
e
s
1
4
Ci
t
y
B
u
s
e
s
1
5
D
R
A
F
T
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
S
t
a
t
e
R
a
i
l
P
l
a
n
2
0
1
3
Co
m
m
u
t
e
r
B
u
s
e
s
1
6
C
a
l
t
r
a
n
s
,
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
3
Ra
i
l
Y
a
r
d
o
r
S
h
o
p
1
7
La
y
o
v
e
r
T
r
a
c
k
s
1
8
M
o
d
e
l
i
n
g
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
v
e
l
y
a
s
s
u
m
e
s
0
.
5
m
i
l
e
a
v
e
r
a
g
e
f
r
e
i
g
h
t
t
r
a
i
n
l
e
n
g
t
h
.
Bu
s
S
t
o
r
a
g
e
Y
a
r
d
1
9
Bu
s
O
p
.
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
2
0
Bu
s
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
C
e
n
t
e
r
2
1
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
G
a
r
a
g
e
2
2
Pa
r
k
&
R
i
d
e
L
o
t
2
3
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
H
a
n
s
o
n
P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
e
R
a
i
l
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
RE
S
U
L
T
S
Ld
n
(
d
B
)
L
e
q
-
d
a
y
t
i
m
e
(
d
B
)
L
e
q
-
n
i
g
h
t
t
i
m
e
(
d
B
)
48
5
0
3
4
46
4
7
3
4
44
4
6
1
7
00
0
00
0
00
0
00
0
00
0
00
0
LA
N
D
U
S
E
C
A
T
E
G
O
R
Y
No
i
s
e
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
r
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
c
a
t
e
g
o
r
y
(
1
,
2
o
r
3
)
So
u
r
c
e
1
S
o
u
r
c
e
2
S
o
u
r
c
e
3
SO
U
R
C
E
R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
L
I
S
T
Pa
g
e
1
No
i
s
e
C
o
n
t
o
u
r
B
u
f
f
e
r
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
UI
D
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
a
m
e
S
e
g
L
o
c
E
x
7
0
d
B
A
E
x
6
5
d
B
A
E
x
6
0
d
B
A
N
o
P
r
j
7
0
d
B
A
N
o
P
r
j
6
5
d
B
A
N
o
P
r
j
6
0
d
B
A
P
r
j
c
t
7
0
d
B
A
P
r
j
c
t
6
5
d
B
A
P
r
j
c
t
6
0
d
B
A
A
l
t
A
7
0
d
B
A
A
l
t
A
6
5
d
B
A
A
l
t
A
6
0
d
B
A
AltB70dBAAltB65dBAAltB60dBA
1
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
4
7
1
0
1
2
1
7
5
6
1
2
0
2
5
8
5
6
1
2
1
2
6
0
5
3
1
1
5
2
4
7
5
7
1
2
2
2
6
3
2
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
7
1
1
5
4
3
3
1
8
8
1
9
0
4
0
9
9
4
2
0
2
4
3
4
9
1
1
9
6
4
2
2
9
1
1
9
6
4
2
3
3
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
9
4
2
0
3
4
3
6
9
9
2
1
4
4
6
1
1
1
3
2
4
4
5
2
5
1
1
2
2
4
1
5
1
9
1
1
2
2
4
1
5
1
9
4
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
8
2
1
7
6
3
7
9
1
1
0
2
3
6
5
0
9
1
1
4
2
4
6
5
3
0
1
1
4
2
4
5
5
2
9
1
1
3
2
4
4
5
2
5
5
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
8
4
1
8
1
3
9
1
1
1
1
2
3
9
5
1
6
1
1
5
2
4
9
5
3
6
1
1
4
2
4
6
5
2
9
1
1
5
2
4
7
5
3
2
6
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
8
7
1
8
7
4
0
2
1
1
6
2
5
1
5
4
1
1
2
0
2
5
8
5
5
5
1
1
8
2
5
5
5
5
0
1
2
0
2
5
8
5
5
6
7
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
8
5
1
8
3
3
9
5
1
1
6
2
4
9
5
3
6
1
1
8
2
5
5
5
4
9
1
1
6
2
5
0
5
3
8
1
1
6
2
5
0
5
3
9
8
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
3
4
7
4
1
6
0
4
1
8
8
1
9
0
4
9
1
0
6
2
2
8
4
0
8
7
1
8
7
4
2
9
1
1
9
7
9
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
3
7
8
1
1
7
4
8
4
1
8
1
3
9
0
9
8
2
1
2
4
5
7
8
2
1
7
8
3
8
2
9
2
1
9
9
4
2
9
10
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
5
6
2
1
2
1
1
2
6
0
8
6
2
0
1
3
3
5
2
8
7
7
6
1
9
1
3
3
4
2
8
7
4
6
1
8
1
3
3
1
2
8
6
7
6
1
7
1
3
2
9
2
8
6
3
11
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
6
5
1
1
4
0
2
3
0
2
1
7
1
8
1
5
4
7
3
3
3
2
7
2
4
1
5
6
1
3
3
6
3
7
2
0
1
5
5
1
3
3
4
1
7
1
8
1
5
4
8
3
3
3
4
12
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
6
1
3
1
3
2
1
2
8
4
6
6
2
9
1
3
5
6
2
9
2
2
6
4
0
1
3
7
9
2
9
7
2
6
3
5
1
3
6
7
2
9
4
6
6
3
7
1
3
7
2
2
9
5
6
13
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
6
1
3
1
3
2
1
2
8
4
6
6
2
9
1
3
5
6
2
9
2
2
6
4
0
1
3
7
9
2
9
7
2
6
3
5
1
3
6
7
2
9
4
6
6
3
7
1
3
7
2
2
9
5
6
14
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
6
0
8
1
3
1
0
2
8
2
2
6
5
7
1
4
1
6
3
0
5
2
6
3
4
1
3
6
6
2
9
4
2
6
2
7
1
3
5
0
2
9
0
9
6
2
8
1
3
5
2
2
9
1
4
15
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
6
0
8
1
3
1
0
2
8
2
2
6
2
4
1
3
4
3
2
8
9
4
6
3
4
1
3
6
6
2
9
4
2
6
2
7
1
3
5
0
2
9
0
9
6
2
7
1
3
5
1
2
9
1
0
16
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
6
1
9
1
3
3
3
2
8
7
2
6
3
0
1
3
5
8
2
9
2
5
6
5
6
1
4
1
3
3
0
4
4
6
5
4
1
4
1
0
3
0
3
7
6
5
3
1
4
0
7
3
0
3
1
17
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
6
1
9
1
3
3
3
2
8
7
2
6
3
4
1
3
6
6
2
9
4
3
6
5
6
1
4
1
3
3
0
4
4
6
5
4
1
4
1
0
3
0
3
7
6
5
3
1
4
0
7
3
0
3
1
18
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
4
8
0
1
0
3
4
2
2
2
8
6
6
0
1
4
2
1
3
0
6
2
6
5
6
1
4
1
3
3
0
4
4
6
3
3
1
3
6
3
2
9
3
8
6
5
3
1
4
0
7
3
0
3
1
19
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
2
1
4
6
9
9
2
8
6
0
1
3
0
2
8
6
1
1
3
1
2
8
6
0
1
2
9
2
8
6
1
1
3
0
20
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
u
b
b
R
d
6
6
1
4
1
3
0
5
8
2
1
7
7
3
8
2
8
1
1
7
4
3
7
5
8
2
1
7
6
3
7
9
8
0
1
7
2
3
7
0
21
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
B
u
b
b
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
1
0
1
2
1
9
4
7
1
1
2
6
2
7
2
5
8
7
1
2
4
2
6
8
5
7
7
1
2
6
2
7
3
5
8
7
1
2
4
2
6
8
5
7
8
22
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
1
0
7
2
3
0
4
9
6
1
1
5
2
4
8
5
3
4
1
2
0
2
5
8
5
5
5
1
1
5
2
4
9
5
3
6
1
1
7
2
5
3
5
4
5
23
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
8
9
1
9
2
4
1
3
1
1
3
2
4
3
5
2
3
1
2
2
2
6
2
5
6
5
1
1
6
2
5
1
5
4
0
1
1
6
2
5
1
5
4
0
24
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
8
4
1
8
1
3
8
9
1
1
4
2
4
6
5
2
9
1
4
4
3
1
1
6
7
0
1
1
4
2
4
5
5
2
9
1
2
4
2
6
8
5
7
7
25
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
8
4
1
8
0
3
8
8
1
1
9
2
5
7
5
5
4
1
3
2
2
8
5
6
1
3
1
1
6
2
5
1
5
4
0
1
2
8
2
7
6
5
9
4
26
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
1
0
9
2
3
5
5
0
6
1
3
2
2
8
4
6
1
3
1
3
4
2
8
9
6
2
3
1
3
4
2
9
0
6
2
4
1
3
7
2
9
4
6
3
4
27
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
1
1
5
2
4
7
5
3
3
1
2
7
2
7
3
5
8
8
1
3
6
2
9
2
6
3
0
1
2
9
2
7
7
5
9
7
1
3
6
2
9
3
6
3
2
28
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
1
1
0
2
3
7
5
1
1
1
4
3
3
0
8
6
6
4
1
5
3
3
3
0
7
1
0
1
4
4
3
1
0
6
6
8
1
4
8
3
1
9
6
8
7
29
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
/
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
d
t
o
B
u
b
b
R
d
2
4
5
3
1
1
3
3
5
7
5
1
6
2
3
4
7
4
1
5
9
3
6
7
7
1
6
5
3
5
7
5
1
6
3
30
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
B
u
b
b
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
3
6
7
7
1
6
7
4
3
9
3
2
0
1
4
3
9
2
1
9
7
4
2
9
1
1
9
6
4
2
9
0
1
9
4
31
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
4
0
8
6
1
8
6
4
7
1
0
1
2
1
8
4
6
1
0
0
2
1
5
4
6
9
9
2
1
4
4
7
1
0
0
2
1
6
32
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
4
4
9
4
2
0
3
4
3
9
3
1
9
9
4
6
1
0
0
2
1
4
4
6
1
0
0
2
1
4
4
7
1
0
1
2
1
7
33
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
S
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
6
9
1
4
8
3
1
9
9
4
2
0
3
4
3
8
9
9
2
1
3
4
5
9
9
5
2
0
4
4
3
9
9
6
2
0
8
4
4
7
34
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
4
7
1
0
2
2
1
9
6
6
1
4
2
3
0
7
7
0
1
5
0
3
2
3
6
6
1
4
3
3
0
7
6
8
1
4
6
3
1
4
35
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
t
o
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
4
2
9
1
1
9
7
7
5
1
6
1
3
4
6
7
7
1
6
6
3
5
8
5
3
1
1
5
2
4
7
7
6
1
6
4
3
5
2
36
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
8
4
1
8
1
3
9
0
1
1
8
2
5
4
5
4
6
1
1
9
2
5
7
5
5
3
1
1
8
2
5
3
5
4
6
1
1
9
2
5
6
5
5
1
37
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
F
r
o
m
B
u
b
b
R
d
t
o
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
1
8
3
9
8
5
2
8
6
1
1
3
0
2
9
6
2
1
3
4
2
9
6
2
1
3
4
2
8
6
0
1
2
9
38
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
5
0
1
0
8
2
3
2
5
4
1
1
5
2
4
9
5
4
1
1
6
2
5
1
5
4
1
1
6
2
5
1
5
4
1
1
5
2
4
8
39
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
4
7
1
0
2
2
2
0
5
3
1
1
5
2
4
8
5
4
1
1
6
2
5
0
5
4
1
1
6
2
4
9
5
4
1
1
6
2
4
9
40
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
1
2
9
2
7
8
5
9
8
1
6
3
3
5
1
7
5
5
1
7
8
3
8
3
8
2
6
1
7
2
3
7
0
7
9
7
2
0
6
4
4
4
9
5
6
41
N
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
1
1
0
2
3
7
5
1
1
9
5
2
0
5
4
4
1
1
2
1
2
6
0
5
6
1
1
1
7
2
5
1
5
4
2
1
1
6
2
4
9
5
3
7
42
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
4
8
1
0
3
2
2
2
5
4
1
1
7
2
5
2
5
5
1
1
7
2
5
3
5
4
1
1
6
2
5
1
5
4
1
1
6
2
4
9
43
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
2
8
6
1
1
3
2
3
7
7
9
1
7
1
3
7
8
0
1
7
2
3
7
7
9
1
7
0
3
7
7
9
1
7
1
44
B
u
b
b
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
7
0
1
5
0
3
2
3
7
9
1
7
1
3
6
8
8
5
1
8
3
3
9
4
8
1
1
7
4
3
7
4
8
4
1
8
1
3
9
0
45
B
u
b
b
R
d
F
r
o
m
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
3
2
6
8
1
4
7
3
8
8
2
1
7
6
3
7
8
0
1
7
3
3
8
8
2
1
7
6
3
4
7
4
1
5
9
46
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
5
2
8
1
1
3
7
2
4
5
0
5
2
3
1
1
2
6
2
4
2
7
5
3
4
1
1
5
1
2
4
7
9
5
3
2
1
1
4
7
2
4
7
0
5
3
0
1
1
4
2
2
4
6
1
47
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
5
2
8
1
1
3
7
2
4
5
0
5
1
3
1
1
0
6
2
3
8
3
5
1
7
1
1
1
3
2
3
9
8
5
1
2
1
1
0
3
2
3
7
6
5
1
5
1
1
0
9
2
3
8
8
48
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
5
7
4
1
2
3
6
2
6
6
3
6
1
6
1
3
2
6
2
8
5
8
6
1
7
1
3
3
0
2
8
6
5
5
3
5
1
1
5
3
2
4
8
5
6
1
4
1
3
2
3
2
8
5
0
49
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
5
2
0
1
1
1
9
2
4
1
2
5
0
6
1
0
9
1
2
3
5
0
5
0
9
1
0
9
7
2
3
6
4
5
0
5
1
0
8
8
2
3
4
4
5
0
7
1
0
9
2
2
3
5
4
50
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
5
2
0
1
1
1
9
2
4
1
2
5
0
6
1
0
9
1
2
3
5
0
5
0
9
1
0
9
7
2
3
6
4
5
0
5
1
0
8
8
2
3
4
4
5
0
7
1
0
9
2
2
3
5
4
51
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
5
2
0
1
1
1
9
2
4
1
2
5
0
6
1
0
9
1
2
3
5
0
5
0
9
1
0
9
7
2
3
6
4
5
0
5
1
0
8
8
2
3
4
4
5
0
7
1
0
9
2
2
3
5
4
52
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
5
0
5
1
0
8
7
2
3
4
2
5
0
1
1
0
7
9
2
3
2
5
5
0
4
1
0
8
5
2
3
3
7
5
0
0
1
0
7
7
2
3
2
0
5
0
1
1
0
7
9
2
3
2
4
No
i
s
e
C
o
n
t
o
u
r
B
u
f
f
e
r
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
53
H
o
l
l
e
n
b
e
c
k
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
2
1
4
6
9
9
2
3
4
9
1
0
5
2
7
5
9
1
2
7
2
2
4
8
1
0
4
2
1
4
5
9
7
54
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
3
5
7
6
1
6
3
4
8
1
0
4
2
2
5
5
7
1
2
2
2
6
3
5
0
1
0
9
2
3
4
5
5
1
1
9
2
5
7
55
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
3
5
7
5
1
6
2
4
8
1
0
4
2
2
4
5
6
1
2
1
2
6
2
5
0
1
0
8
2
3
3
5
5
1
1
9
2
5
6
56
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
2
8
6
0
1
3
0
8
2
1
7
7
3
8
2
8
6
1
8
6
4
0
0
8
4
1
8
1
3
9
0
8
4
1
8
1
3
9
1
57
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
1
8
4
0
8
6
3
3
7
1
1
5
3
3
8
8
2
1
7
7
3
7
7
9
1
7
1
3
5
7
6
1
6
3
58
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
1
8
3
9
8
3
2
9
6
3
1
3
6
3
5
7
6
1
6
4
3
4
7
2
1
5
6
3
3
7
0
1
5
1
59
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
2
0
4
4
9
5
2
6
5
6
1
2
1
2
8
6
1
1
3
2
2
9
6
3
1
3
7
2
7
5
7
1
2
4
60
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
1
6
0
3
4
5
7
4
3
1
7
5
3
7
6
8
1
1
1
7
5
3
7
6
8
1
1
1
7
2
3
7
0
7
9
7
1
7
1
3
6
8
7
9
4
61
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
1
9
8
4
2
7
9
1
9
2
0
0
4
3
2
9
3
0
2
0
1
4
3
3
9
3
3
2
0
1
4
3
3
9
3
3
2
0
3
4
3
7
9
4
1
62
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
1
5
7
3
3
9
7
3
0
1
7
3
3
7
2
8
0
2
1
8
3
3
9
5
8
5
1
1
7
2
3
7
1
7
9
9
1
7
9
3
8
6
8
3
2
63
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
1
3
3
2
8
7
6
1
9
1
5
8
3
4
1
7
3
4
1
6
5
3
5
6
7
6
7
1
5
7
3
3
8
7
2
9
1
6
4
3
5
3
7
6
0
64
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
1
3
7
2
9
4
6
3
4
1
7
1
3
6
8
7
9
2
1
7
3
3
7
3
8
0
4
1
6
9
3
6
5
7
8
7
1
7
2
3
7
1
7
9
9
65
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
1
3
0
2
7
9
6
0
2
1
4
0
3
0
2
6
5
1
1
5
2
3
2
8
7
0
6
1
4
4
3
1
0
6
6
9
1
5
0
3
2
3
6
9
6
66
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
1
4
1
3
0
3
6
5
2
1
5
8
3
4
1
7
3
5
1
7
6
3
7
9
8
1
6
1
5
9
3
4
2
7
3
6
1
7
6
3
7
8
8
1
5
67
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
1
4
7
3
1
6
6
8
0
1
4
8
3
1
9
6
8
8
1
5
3
3
2
9
7
0
9
1
4
9
3
2
0
6
9
0
1
5
1
3
2
6
7
0
3
68
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
2
4
5
2
1
1
3
3
8
8
1
1
7
5
4
0
8
6
1
8
5
3
7
7
9
1
7
1
3
7
8
0
1
7
2
69
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
2
5
5
4
1
1
7
1
9
4
1
8
8
3
7
7
9
1
7
0
3
4
7
2
1
5
6
3
3
7
1
1
5
3
70
S
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
1
1
2
4
5
1
1
1
2
4
5
1
1
5
3
2
6
9
1
2
2
6
5
6
1
3
2
8
6
1
71
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
1
9
4
0
8
7
1
9
4
2
9
0
2
4
5
1
1
1
1
2
1
4
5
9
6
2
3
4
9
1
0
5
72
S
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
7
0
1
5
0
3
2
3
1
0
7
2
3
0
4
9
6
1
1
1
2
3
9
5
1
4
1
0
9
2
3
4
5
0
5
1
1
1
2
3
9
5
1
5
73
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
9
5
2
0
5
4
4
3
1
2
1
2
6
1
5
6
2
1
2
4
2
6
8
5
7
6
1
2
5
2
6
9
5
7
9
1
2
3
2
6
5
5
7
2
74
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
1
0
4
2
2
3
4
8
1
1
3
3
2
8
6
6
1
6
1
3
5
2
9
1
6
2
7
1
3
6
2
9
4
6
3
3
1
3
8
2
9
7
6
3
9
75
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
7
7
1
6
6
3
5
8
1
0
9
2
3
5
5
0
7
1
3
1
2
8
1
6
0
6
1
0
8
2
3
3
5
0
1
1
1
6
2
5
0
5
3
9
76
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
5
0
1
0
9
2
3
4
8
1
1
7
5
3
7
7
9
2
1
9
8
4
2
6
7
5
1
6
2
3
5
0
8
8
1
9
0
4
0
9
77
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
4
9
1
0
6
2
2
9
5
9
1
2
7
2
7
3
6
5
1
4
0
3
0
1
6
0
1
2
8
2
7
6
6
2
1
3
4
2
8
9
78
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
3
7
1
4
3
7
8
0
1
7
1
4
3
9
3
2
0
0
3
8
8
1
1
7
5
4
4
9
4
2
0
3
79
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
5
1
0
2
3
2
5
5
4
1
1
7
3
4
7
4
1
5
9
2
6
5
5
1
2
0
2
9
6
2
1
3
4
80
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
2
6
5
6
1
2
1
3
4
7
4
1
5
8
4
4
9
5
2
0
4
3
4
7
4
1
5
9
4
2
9
1
1
9
5
81
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
1
8
3
8
8
2
1
7
3
7
8
0
1
8
3
8
8
2
1
7
3
6
7
8
1
7
3
7
7
9
82
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
2
2
8
4
9
0
1
0
5
7
3
0
0
6
4
7
1
3
9
4
2
9
9
6
4
5
1
3
8
9
3
4
5
7
4
3
1
6
0
0
2
9
6
6
3
8
1
3
7
4
83
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
2
1
2
4
5
6
9
8
2
2
8
8
6
2
1
1
3
3
7
2
9
5
6
3
5
1
3
6
9
2
8
9
6
2
3
1
3
4
1
3
0
2
6
5
0
1
4
0
0
84
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
2
3
3
5
0
2
1
0
8
1
3
1
0
6
6
8
1
4
3
9
3
0
9
6
6
6
1
4
3
4
2
7
5
5
9
2
1
2
7
5
3
1
4
6
7
7
1
4
5
8
........................................................................................................................
EXISTING CONDITIONS
ROADWAY NOISE MODELING
........................................................................................................................
#
RO
A
D
W
A
Y
S
E
G
M
E
N
T
A
D
T
PO
S
T
E
D
SP
E
E
D
LI
M
I
T
LA
N
E
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
SI
T
E
CO
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
R
O
A
D
C
L
A
S
S
.
GR
A
D
E
(%
)
A
N
A
L
Y
S
T
RO
A
D
CL
A
S
S
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
P
E
E
D
LANE DISTANCE
1
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
7,
8
9
3
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
EH
P
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
2
0
2
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
14
,
8
9
2
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
Mi
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
2
8
3
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
22
,
5
2
0
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
4
8
4
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
18
,
1
9
4
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
A
6
8
5
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
19
,
0
9
7
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
5
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
B
7
5
6
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
19
,
9
0
8
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
6
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
C
5
5
7
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
19
,
3
9
3
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
7
8
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
5,
0
3
8
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
8
9
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
5,
7
0
5
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
9
DA
I
L
Y
H
O
U
R
L
Y
10
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
10
5
,
7
6
1
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
0
%
A
77.3%DAY78.1%
11
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
13
1
,
8
2
9
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
1
%
M
T
16.2%EVENING9.1%
12
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
12
0
,
5
4
0
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
2
%
H
T
6
.
5
%
N
I
G
H
T
1
2
.
9
%
13
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
12
0
,
5
4
0
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
3
14
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
11
9
,
0
2
1
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
4
15
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
11
9
,
0
2
1
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
5
16
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
12
2
,
2
2
5
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
6
100feet
17
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
12
2
,
2
2
5
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
7
18
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
83
,
5
0
9
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
8
19
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
2,
4
5
0
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
9
20
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
u
b
b
R
d
13
,
1
4
6
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
0
21
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
B
u
b
b
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
24
,
4
9
4
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
1
22
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
26
,
4
9
2
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
2
23
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
20
,
1
4
9
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
3
24
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
18
,
4
2
0
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
4
25
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
18
,
3
3
6
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
5
26
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
27
,
2
9
4
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
6
27
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
29
,
4
8
5
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
7
28
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
27
,
7
2
4
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
8
29
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
/
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
d
t
o
B
u
b
b
R
d
4,
8
3
7
25
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
9
30
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
B
u
b
b
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
6,
7
0
2
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
0
31
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
7,
8
8
0
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
1
32
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
9,
0
0
3
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
2
33
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
S
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
14
,
0
7
2
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
3
34
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
12
,
9
1
2
25
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
4
35
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
t
o
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
11
,
0
0
3
25
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
5
36
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
19
,
0
3
5
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
6
37
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
F
r
o
m
B
u
b
b
R
d
t
o
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
3,
1
4
8
25
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
7
38
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
8,
7
9
0
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
8
39
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
8,
1
1
4
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
9
40
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
29
,
4
7
0
40
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
0
41
N
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
23
,
2
6
9
40
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
1
42
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
10
,
2
8
1
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
4
2
43
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
4,
7
0
8
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
4
3
44
B
u
b
b
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
14
,
3
6
8
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
4
45
B
u
b
b
R
d
F
r
o
m
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
5,
5
6
5
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
4
5
46
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
98
,
3
8
7
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
6
47
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
98
,
3
8
7
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
7
48
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
11
1
,
4
8
7
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
8
49
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
96
,
0
9
4
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
9
50
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
96
,
0
9
4
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
5
0
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
u
p
t
e
r
i
n
o
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
S
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
T
O
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
XISTING CONDITIONSCONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS RESULT SUMMARY TABLE
70
dBA CNEL
65
dBA CNEL
60
dBA CNEL
1 Homestead RdFrom City Limit to Highway 85 7,893 65.0 47 101 217
2 Homestead RdFrom Highway 85 to N Stelling Rd 14,892 67.8 71 154 331
3 Homestead RdFrom N Stelling Rd to N De Anza Blvd 22,520 69.6 94 203 436
4 Homestead RdFrom N De Anza Blvd to N Blaney Ave 18,194 68.7 82 176 379
5 Homestead RdFrom N Blaney Ave to N Wolfe Rd 19,097 68.9 84 181 391
6 Homestead RdFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 19,908 69.1 87 187 402
7 Homestead RdFrom N Tantau Ave to City Limit 19,393 68.9 85 183 395
8 Pruneridge AveFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 5,038 63.1 34 74 160
9 Pruneridge AveFrom N Tantau Ave to Lawrence Expwy 5,705 63.6 37 81 174
10 Junipero Serra FwyFrom City Limit to Foothill Blvd 105,761 81.2 562 1,211 2,608
11 Junipero Serra FwyFrom Foothill Blvd to Highway 85 131,829 82.2 651 1,402 3,021
12 Junipero Serra FwyFrom Highway 85 to N Stelling Rd 120,540 81.8 613 1,321 2,846
13 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Stelling Rd to N De Anza Blvd 120,540 81.8 613 1,321 2,846
14 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N De Anza Blvd to N Blaney Ave 119,021 81.8 608 1,310 2,822
15 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Blaney Ave to N Wolfe Rd 119,021 81.8 608 1,310 2,822
16 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 122,225 81.9 619 1,333 2,872
17 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Tantau Ave to I-280 122,225 81.9 619 1,333 2,872
18 Junipero Serra FwyFrom I-280 to Lawrence Expwy 83,509 80.2 480 1,034 2,228
19 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom City Limit to Foothill Blvd 2,450 60.0 21 46 99
20 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom Foothill Blvd to Bubb Rd 13,146 67.3 66 141 305
21 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom Bubb Rd to Highway 85 24,494 70.1 101 219 471
22 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom Highway 85 N Stelling Rd 26,492 70.4 107 230 496
23 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N Stelling Rd to N De Anza Blvd 20,149 69.2 89 192 413
24 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N De Anza Blvd to N Blaney Ave 18,420 68.9 84 181 389
25 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N Blaney Ave to N Wolfe Rd 18,336 68.8 84 180 388
26 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 27,294 70.6 109 235 506
27 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom S Tantau Ave to I-280 29,485 70.9 115 247 533
28 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom I-280 to Lawrence Expwy 27,724 70.6 110 237 511
29 Mcclellan RdFrom Foothill Blvd/Stevens Canyon Rd to Bub 4,837 60.8 24 53 113
30 Mcclellan RdFrom Bubb Rd to Highway 85 6,702 63.3 36 77 167
31 Mcclellan RdFrom Highway 85 to S Stelling Rd 7,880 64.0 40 86 186
32 Mcclellan RdFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 9,003 64.6 44 94 203
33 Bollinger RdFrom S De Anza Blvd to S Blaney Ave 14,072 67.6 69 148 319
34 Bollinger RdFrom S Blaney Ave to Miller Ave 12,912 65.1 47 102 219
35 Bollinger RdFrom Miller Ave to S Tantau Ave 11,003 64.4 42 91 197
36 Bollinger RdFrom S Tantau Ave to Lawrence Expwy 19,035 68.9 84 181 390
37 Rainbow DrFrom Bubb Rd to S Stelling Rd 3,148 58.9 18 39 85
38 Rainbow DrFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 8,790 65.5 50 108 232
39 Prospect RdFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 8,114 65.1 47 102 220
40 Foothill ExpwyFrom City Limit to I-280 29,470 71.7 129 278 598
41 N Foothill BlvdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 23,269 70.6 110 237 511
42 Foothill BlvdFrom McClellan Rd to Stevens Creek Blvd 10,281 65.2 48 103 222
43 Stevens Canyon RdFrom City Limit to McClellan Rd 4,708 61.8 28 61 132
44 Bubb RdFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 14,368 67.6 70 150 323
45 Bubb RdFrom Rainbow Dr to McClellan Rd 5,565 62.5 32 68 147
46 Stevens Creek FwyFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 98,387 80.8 528 1,137 2,450
47 Stevens Creek FwyFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 98,387 80.8 528 1,137 2,450
48 West Valley FwyFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 111,487 81.4 574 1,236 2,663
49 West Valley FwyFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 96,094 80.7 520 1,119 2,412
50 West Valley FwyFrom McClellan Rd to S Stelling Rd 96,094 80.7 520 1,119 2,412
City of Cupterino General Plan Amendment
ROADWAYSEGMENT
DAILY
TRAFIC
VOLUMES
NOISE
LEVEL
AT 100 FT.
(dBA CNEL)
DISTACE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FT.)
#
#
RO
A
D
W
A
Y
S
E
G
M
E
N
T
A
D
T
PO
S
T
E
D
SP
E
E
D
LI
M
I
T
LA
N
E
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
SI
T
E
CO
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
R
O
A
D
C
L
A
S
S
.
GR
A
D
E
(%
)
A
N
A
L
Y
S
T
RO
A
D
CL
A
S
S
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
P
E
E
D
LANE DISTANCE
1
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
96
,
0
9
4
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0%
1
EH
P
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
2
0
2
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
91
,
9
5
5
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
2
Mi
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
2
8
3
H
o
l
l
e
n
b
e
c
k
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
3,
0
9
0
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
4
8
4
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
6,
4
2
2
30
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
A
6
8
5
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
6,
4
2
2
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
5
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
B
7
5
6
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
3,
6
5
0
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
6
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
C
5
5
7
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
1,
9
7
5
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
7
8
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
1,
8
9
5
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
8
9
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
2,
2
9
6
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
9
DA
I
L
Y
H
O
U
R
L
Y
10
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
39
,
5
5
3
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
0
%
A
77.3%DAY78.1%
11
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
54
,
4
7
3
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
1
%
M
T
16.2%EVENING9.1%
12
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
38
,
5
3
4
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
2
%
H
T
6
.
5
%
N
I
G
H
T
1
2
.
9
%
13
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
30
,
0
8
7
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
3
14
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
31
,
2
1
8
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
4
15
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
28
,
8
5
3
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
5
16
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
32
,
5
5
2
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
6
100feet
17
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
34
,
6
8
8
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
7
18
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
3,
7
4
5
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
1
8
19
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
3,
9
1
8
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
1
9
20
S
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
1,
1
4
8
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
0
21
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
2,
5
1
9
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
1
22
S
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
14
,
3
5
6
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
2
23
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
22
,
9
9
2
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
3
24
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
26
,
0
2
7
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
4
25
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
16
,
7
5
2
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
5
26
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
8,
8
4
1
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
6
27
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
8,
5
8
2
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
7
28
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
13
7
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
8
29
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
26
6
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
9
30
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
3,
3
0
1
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
0
31
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
2,
9
8
4
25
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
1
32
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
45
,
9
8
8
50
5
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
C
0
%
3
2
33
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
41
,
2
2
1
50
5
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
C
0
%
3
3
34
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
47
,
5
7
1
50
5
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
C
0
%
3
4
35
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
5
36
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
6
37
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
7
38
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
8
39
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
9
40
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
0
41
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
1
42
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
2
43
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
3
44
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
4
45
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
5
46
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
6
47
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
7
48
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
8
49
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
9
50
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
5
0
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
u
p
t
e
r
i
n
o
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
S
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
T
O
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
XISTING CONDITIONSCONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS RESULT SUMMARY TABLE
70
dBA CNEL
65
dBA CNEL
60
dBA CNEL
1 West Valley FwyFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 96,094 80.7 520 1,119 2,412
2 West Valley FwyFrom S De Anza Blvd to Prospect Rd 91,955 80.5 505 1,087 2,342
3 Hollenbeck AveFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 3,090 60.0 21 46 99
4 N Stelling RdFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 6,422 63.2 35 76 163
5 N Stelling RdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 6,422 63.1 35 75 162
6 S Stelling RdFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 3,650 61.7 28 60 130
7 S Stelling RdFrom McClellan Rd to Highway 85 1,975 59.0 18 40 86
8 S Stelling RdFrom Highway 85 to Rainbow Dr 1,895 58.8 18 39 83
9 S Stelling RdFrom Rainbow Dr to Prospect Rd 2,296 59.7 20 44 95
10 N De Anza BlvdFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 39,553 73.1 160 345 743
11 N De Anza BlvdFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 54,473 74.5 198 427 919
12 N De Anza BlvdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 38,534 72.9 157 339 730
13 S De Anza BlvdFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 30,087 71.9 133 287 619
14 S De Anza BlvdFrom McClellan Rd to Bollinger Rd 31,218 72.0 137 294 634
15 S De Anza BlvdFrom Bollinger Rd to Highway 85 28,853 71.7 130 279 602
16 S De Anza BlvdFrom Highway 85 to Rainbow Dr 32,552 72.2 141 303 652
17 S De Anza BlvdFrom Rainbow Dr to Prospect Rd 34,688 72.5 147 316 680
18 N Blaney AveFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 3,745 60.8 24 52 113
19 N Blaney AveFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 3,918 61.0 25 54 117
20 S Blaney AveFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to Bollinger Rd 1,148 55.7 11 24 51
21 Blaney AveFrom Bollinger Rd to Prospect Rd 2,519 59.1 19 40 87
22 S Wolfe RdFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 14,356 67.6 70 150 323
23 N Wolfe RdFrom Homestead Rd to Pruneridge Ave 22,992 69.7 95 205 443
24 N Wolfe RdFrom Pruneridge Ave to I-280 26,027 70.2 104 223 481
25 N Wolfe RdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 16,752 68.3 77 166 358
26 Miller AveFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to Bollinger Rd 8,841 65.5 50 109 234
27 Miller AveFrom Bollinger Rd to City Limit 8,582 65.4 49 106 229
28 N Tantau AveFrom Homestead Rd to Pruneridge Ave 137 47.4 3 7 14
29 N Tantau AveFrom Pruneridge Ave to I-280 266 50.3 5 10 23
30 N Tantau AveFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 3,301 61.2 26 56 121
31 S Tantau AveFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to Bollinger Rd 2,984 58.7 18 38 82
32 Lawrence ExpwyFrom Pruneridge Ave to Stevens Creek Blvd 45,988 75.4 228 490 1,057
33 Lawrence ExpwyFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to I-280 41,221 74.9 212 456 982
34 Lawrence ExpwyFrom I-280 to Bollinger Rd 47,571 75.5 233 502 1,081
35 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
36 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
37 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
38 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
39 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
40 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
41 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
42 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
43 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
44 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
45 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
46 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
50 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
City of Cupterino General Plan Amendment
ROADWAYSEGMENT
DAILY
TRAFIC
VOLUMES
NOISE
LEVEL
AT 100 FT.
(dBA CNEL)
DISTACE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FT.)
#
........................................................................................................................
PROPOSED PROJECT
ROADWAY NOISE MODELING
........................................................................................................................
#
RO
A
D
W
A
Y
S
E
G
M
E
N
T
A
D
T
PO
S
T
E
D
SP
E
E
D
LI
M
I
T
LA
N
E
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
SI
T
E
CO
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
R
O
A
D
C
L
A
S
S
.
GR
A
D
E
(%
)
A
N
A
L
Y
S
T
RO
A
D
CL
A
S
S
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
P
E
E
D
LANE DISTANCE
1
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
10
,
3
8
3
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
EH
P
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
2
0
2
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
22
,
3
5
5
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
Mi
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
2
8
3
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
29
,
6
9
5
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
4
8
4
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
30
,
1
1
1
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
A
6
8
5
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
30
,
6
1
4
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
5
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
B
7
5
6
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
32
,
3
1
3
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
6
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
C
5
5
7
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
31
,
7
8
0
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
7
8
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
8,
5
4
5
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
8
9
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
24
,
2
6
8
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
9
DA
I
L
Y
H
O
U
R
L
Y
10
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
12
2
,
3
1
1
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
0
%
A
77.3%DAY78.1%
11
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
15
4
,
8
2
5
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
1
%
M
T
16.2%EVENING9.1%
12
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
12
8
,
6
3
0
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
2
%
H
T
6
.
5
%
N
I
G
H
T
1
2
.
9
%
13
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
12
8
,
6
3
0
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
3
14
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
12
6
,
7
2
4
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
4
15
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
12
6
,
7
2
4
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
5
16
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
13
3
,
3
6
3
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
6
100feet
17
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
13
3
,
3
6
3
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
7
18
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
13
3
,
3
6
3
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
8
19
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
3,
6
9
3
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
9
20
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
u
b
b
R
d
17
,
9
5
8
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
0
21
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
B
u
b
b
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
33
,
2
2
9
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
1
22
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
31
,
3
8
9
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
2
23
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
32
,
2
1
4
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
3
24
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
41
,
5
4
3
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
4
25
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
36
,
3
9
9
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
5
26
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
37
,
2
4
8
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
6
27
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
37
,
9
0
8
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
7
28
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
45
,
3
6
2
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
8
29
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
/
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
d
t
o
B
u
b
b
R
d
8,
0
5
1
25
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
9
30
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
B
u
b
b
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
8,
6
4
2
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
0
31
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
9,
7
9
8
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
1
32
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
9,
7
8
5
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
2
33
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
S
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
24
,
2
7
7
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
3
34
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
23
,
0
7
7
25
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
4
35
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
t
o
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
26
,
9
7
5
25
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
5
36
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
32
,
1
3
2
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
6
37
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
F
r
o
m
B
u
b
b
R
d
t
o
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
6,
2
0
2
25
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
7
38
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
9,
8
8
2
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
8
39
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
9,
8
0
8
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
9
40
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
47
,
8
0
0
40
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
0
41
N
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
26
,
7
6
8
40
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
1
42
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
12
,
5
4
6
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
4
2
43
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
7,
0
0
1
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
4
3
44
B
u
b
b
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
19
,
3
1
5
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
4
45
B
u
b
b
R
d
F
r
o
m
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
7,
0
8
9
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
4
5
46
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
10
0
,
1
5
4
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
6
47
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
95
,
2
9
4
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
7
48
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
12
4
,
4
3
5
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
8
49
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
93
,
2
2
5
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
9
50
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
93
,
2
2
5
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
5
0
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
u
p
t
e
r
i
n
o
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
T
O
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
Proposed ProjectCONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS RESULT SUMMARY TABLE
70
dBA CNEL
65
dBA CNEL
60
dBA CNEL
1 Homestead RdFrom City Limit to Highway 85 10,383 66.2 56 121 260
2 Homestead RdFrom Highway 85 to N Stelling Rd 22,355 69.6 94 202 434
3 Homestead RdFrom N Stelling Rd to N De Anza Blvd 29,695 70.8 113 244 525
4 Homestead RdFrom N De Anza Blvd to N Blaney Ave 30,111 70.9 114 246 530
5 Homestead RdFrom N Blaney Ave to N Wolfe Rd 30,614 70.9 115 249 536
6 Homestead RdFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 32,313 71.2 120 258 555
7 Homestead RdFrom N Tantau Ave to City Limit 31,780 71.1 118 255 549
8 Pruneridge AveFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 8,545 65.4 49 106 228
9 Pruneridge AveFrom N Tantau Ave to Lawrence Expwy 24,268 69.9 98 212 457
10 Junipero Serra FwyFrom City Limit to Foothill Blvd 122,311 81.9 619 1,334 2,874
11 Junipero Serra FwyFrom Foothill Blvd to Highway 85 154,825 82.9 724 1,561 3,363
12 Junipero Serra FwyFrom Highway 85 to N Stelling Rd 128,630 82.1 640 1,379 2,972
13 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Stelling Rd to N De Anza Blvd 128,630 82.1 640 1,379 2,972
14 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N De Anza Blvd to N Blaney Ave 126,724 82.0 634 1,366 2,942
15 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Blaney Ave to N Wolfe Rd 126,724 82.0 634 1,366 2,942
16 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 133,363 82.3 656 1,413 3,044
17 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Tantau Ave to I-280 133,363 82.3 656 1,413 3,044
18 Junipero Serra FwyFrom I-280 to Lawrence Expwy 133,363 82.3 656 1,413 3,044
19 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom City Limit to Foothill Blvd 3,693 61.7 28 61 131
20 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom Foothill Blvd to Bubb Rd 17,958 68.6 81 174 375
21 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom Bubb Rd to Highway 85 33,229 71.4 124 268 577
22 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom Highway 85 N Stelling Rd 31,389 71.2 120 258 555
23 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N Stelling Rd to N De Anza Blvd 32,214 71.3 122 262 565
24 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N De Anza Blvd to N Blaney Ave 41,543 72.4 144 311 670
25 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N Blaney Ave to N Wolfe Rd 36,399 71.8 132 285 613
26 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 37,248 71.9 134 289 623
27 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom S Tantau Ave to I-280 37,908 72.0 136 292 630
28 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom I-280 to Lawrence Expwy 45,362 72.8 153 330 710
29 Mcclellan RdFrom Foothill Blvd/Stevens Canyon Rd to Bub 8,051 63.0 34 74 159
30 Mcclellan RdFrom Bubb Rd to Highway 85 8,642 64.4 43 92 197
31 Mcclellan RdFrom Highway 85 to S Stelling Rd 9,798 65.0 46 100 215
32 Mcclellan RdFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 9,785 65.0 46 100 214
33 Bollinger RdFrom S De Anza Blvd to S Blaney Ave 24,277 69.9 99 213 459
34 Bollinger RdFrom S Blaney Ave to Miller Ave 23,077 67.6 70 150 323
35 Bollinger RdFrom Miller Ave to S Tantau Ave 26,975 68.3 77 166 358
36 Bollinger RdFrom S Tantau Ave to Lawrence Expwy 32,132 71.1 119 257 553
37 Rainbow DrFrom Bubb Rd to S Stelling Rd 6,202 61.9 29 62 134
38 Rainbow DrFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 9,882 66.0 54 116 251
39 Prospect RdFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 9,808 66.0 54 116 250
40 Foothill ExpwyFrom City Limit to I-280 47,800 73.8 178 383 826
41 N Foothill BlvdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 26,768 71.2 121 260 561
42 Foothill BlvdFrom McClellan Rd to Stevens Creek Blvd 12,546 66.0 55 117 253
43 Stevens Canyon RdFrom City Limit to McClellan Rd 7,001 63.5 37 80 172
44 Bubb RdFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 19,315 68.9 85 183 394
45 Bubb RdFrom Rainbow Dr to McClellan Rd 7,089 63.6 37 80 173
46 Stevens Creek FwyFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 100,154 80.9 534 1,151 2,479
47 Stevens Creek FwyFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 95,294 80.7 517 1,113 2,398
48 West Valley FwyFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 124,435 81.9 617 1,330 2,865
49 West Valley FwyFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 93,225 80.6 509 1,097 2,364
50 West Valley FwyFrom McClellan Rd to S Stelling Rd 93,225 80.6 509 1,097 2,364
City of Cupterino General Plan Amendment
ROADWAYSEGMENT
DAILY
TRAFIC
VOLUMES
NOISE
LEVEL
AT 100 FT.
(dBA CNEL)
DISTACE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FT.)
#
#
RO
A
D
W
A
Y
S
E
G
M
E
N
T
A
D
T
PO
S
T
E
D
SP
E
E
D
LI
M
I
T
LA
N
E
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
SI
T
E
CO
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
R
O
A
D
C
L
A
S
S
.
GR
A
D
E
(%
)
A
N
A
L
Y
S
T
RO
A
D
CL
A
S
S
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
P
E
E
D
LANE DISTANCE
1
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
93
,
2
2
6
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0%
1
EH
P
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
2
0
2
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
91
,
6
6
8
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
2
Mi
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
2
8
3
H
o
l
l
e
n
b
e
c
k
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
4,
4
3
4
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
4
8
4
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
13
,
1
8
6
30
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
A
6
8
5
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
13
,
1
8
6
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
5
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
B
7
5
6
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
19
,
7
8
0
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
6
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
C
5
5
7
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
5,
8
5
5
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
7
8
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
5,
2
0
8
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
8
9
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
3,
7
7
3
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
9
DA
I
L
Y
H
O
U
R
L
Y
10
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
45
,
1
3
5
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
0
%
A
77.3%DAY78.1%
11
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
55
,
7
1
2
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
1
%
M
T
16.2%EVENING9.1%
12
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
48
,
5
2
8
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
2
%
H
T
6
.
5
%
N
I
G
H
T
1
2
.
9
%
13
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
41
,
5
4
3
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
3
14
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
44
,
5
2
1
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
4
15
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
36
,
7
0
2
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
5
16
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
45
,
5
5
8
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
6
100feet
17
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
36
,
8
6
1
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
7
18
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
7,
8
6
5
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
1
8
19
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
6,
8
8
8
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
1
9
20
S
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
1,
7
9
1
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
0
21
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
3,
6
3
7
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
1
22
S
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
28
,
7
9
6
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
2
23
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
34
,
1
7
7
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
3
24
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
38
,
7
6
6
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
4
25
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
36
,
8
3
0
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
5
26
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
21
,
7
1
3
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
6
27
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
12
,
8
9
1
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
7
28
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
7,
0
4
2
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
8
29
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
4,
9
7
8
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
9
30
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
7,
2
7
4
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
0
31
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
2,
9
7
6
25
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
1
32
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
69
,
3
1
3
50
5
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
C
0
%
3
2
33
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
67
,
7
9
3
50
5
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
C
0
%
3
3
34
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
72
,
6
9
5
50
5
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
C
0
%
3
4
35
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
5
36
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
6
37
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
7
38
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
8
39
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
9
40
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
0
41
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
1
42
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
2
43
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
3
44
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
4
45
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
5
46
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
6
47
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
7
48
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
8
49
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
9
50
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
5
0
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
u
p
t
e
r
i
n
o
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
T
O
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
Proposed ProjectCONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS RESULT SUMMARY TABLE
70
dBA CNEL
65
dBA CNEL
60
dBA CNEL
1 West Valley FwyFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 93,226 80.6 509 1,097 2,364
2 West Valley FwyFrom S De Anza Blvd to Prospect Rd 91,668 80.5 504 1,085 2,337
3 Hollenbeck AveFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 4,434 61.5 27 59 127
4 N Stelling RdFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 13,186 66.3 57 122 263
5 N Stelling RdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 13,186 66.3 56 121 262
6 S Stelling RdFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 19,780 69.0 86 186 400
7 S Stelling RdFrom McClellan Rd to Highway 85 5,855 63.7 38 82 177
8 S Stelling RdFrom Highway 85 to Rainbow Dr 5,208 63.2 35 76 164
9 S Stelling RdFrom Rainbow Dr to Prospect Rd 3,773 61.8 28 61 132
10 N De Anza BlvdFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 45,135 73.6 175 376 811
11 N De Anza BlvdFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 55,712 74.5 201 433 933
12 N De Anza BlvdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 48,528 73.9 183 395 851
13 S De Anza BlvdFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 41,543 73.3 165 356 767
14 S De Anza BlvdFrom McClellan Rd to Bollinger Rd 44,521 73.6 173 373 804
15 S De Anza BlvdFrom Bollinger Rd to Highway 85 36,702 72.7 152 328 706
16 S De Anza BlvdFrom Highway 85 to Rainbow Dr 45,558 73.7 176 379 816
17 S De Anza BlvdFrom Rainbow Dr to Prospect Rd 36,861 72.8 153 329 709
18 N Blaney AveFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 7,865 64.0 40 86 185
19 N Blaney AveFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 6,888 63.4 37 79 170
20 S Blaney AveFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to Bollinger Rd 1,791 57.6 15 32 69
21 Blaney AveFrom Bollinger Rd to Prospect Rd 3,637 60.7 24 51 111
22 S Wolfe RdFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 28,796 70.7 111 239 514
23 N Wolfe RdFrom Homestead Rd to Pruneridge Ave 34,177 71.4 124 268 576
24 N Wolfe RdFrom Pruneridge Ave to I-280 38,766 72.0 135 291 627
25 N Wolfe RdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 36,830 71.7 131 281 606
26 Miller AveFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to Bollinger Rd 21,713 69.4 92 198 426
27 Miller AveFrom Bollinger Rd to City Limit 12,891 67.2 65 140 301
28 N Tantau AveFrom Homestead Rd to Pruneridge Ave 7,042 64.5 43 93 200
29 N Tantau AveFrom Pruneridge Ave to I-280 4,978 63.0 34 74 159
30 N Tantau AveFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 7,274 64.7 44 95 204
31 S Tantau AveFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to Bollinger Rd 2,976 58.7 18 38 82
32 Lawrence ExpwyFrom Pruneridge Ave to Stevens Creek Blvd 69,313 77.1 299 645 1,389
33 Lawrence ExpwyFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to I-280 67,793 77.0 295 635 1,369
34 Lawrence ExpwyFrom I-280 to Bollinger Rd 72,695 77.3 309 666 1,434
35 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
36 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
37 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
38 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
39 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
40 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
41 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
42 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
43 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
44 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
45 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
46 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
50 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
City of Cupterino General Plan Amendment
ROADWAYSEGMENT
DAILY
TRAFIC
VOLUMES
NOISE
LEVEL
AT 100 FT.
(dBA CNEL)
DISTACE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FT.)
#
........................................................................................................................
NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE
ROADWAY NOISE MODELING
........................................................................................................................
#
RO
A
D
W
A
Y
S
E
G
M
E
N
T
A
D
T
PO
S
T
E
D
SP
E
E
D
LI
M
I
T
LA
N
E
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
SI
T
E
CO
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
R
O
A
D
C
L
A
S
S
.
GR
A
D
E
(%
)
A
N
A
L
Y
S
T
RO
A
D
CL
A
S
S
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
P
E
E
D
LANE DISTANCE
1
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
10
,
2
1
9
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
EH
P
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
2
0
2
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
20
,
4
4
3
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
Mi
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
2
8
3
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
24
,
4
0
9
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
4
8
4
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
28
,
3
8
8
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
A
6
8
5
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
28
,
9
1
9
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
5
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
B
7
5
6
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
31
,
0
5
0
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
6
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
C
5
5
7
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
30
,
6
8
4
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
7
8
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
6,
5
0
1
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
8
9
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
19
,
1
3
6
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
9
DA
I
L
Y
H
O
U
R
L
Y
10
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
12
2
,
5
3
9
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
0
%
A
77.3%DAY78.1%
11
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
15
2
,
7
3
2
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
1
%
M
T
16.2%EVENING9.1%
12
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
12
5
,
4
1
0
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
2
%
H
T
6
.
5
%
N
I
G
H
T
1
2
.
9
%
13
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
12
5
,
4
1
0
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
3
14
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
13
3
,
8
5
8
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
4
15
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
12
3
,
6
2
6
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
5
16
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
12
5
,
6
3
6
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
6
100feet
17
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
12
6
,
7
4
3
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
7
18
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
13
4
,
5
6
7
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
8
19
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
3,
6
7
3
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
9
20
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
u
b
b
R
d
18
,
4
6
4
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
0
21
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
B
u
b
b
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
34
,
0
9
9
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
1
22
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
29
,
6
1
9
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
2
23
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
28
,
6
6
8
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
3
24
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
29
,
1
7
7
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
4
25
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
31
,
2
9
2
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
5
26
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
36
,
3
6
1
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
6
27
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
34
,
1
7
8
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
7
28
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
41
,
0
6
1
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
8
29
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
/
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
d
t
o
B
u
b
b
R
d
8,
3
0
3
25
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
9
30
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
B
u
b
b
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
8,
8
5
3
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
0
31
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
10
,
0
2
1
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
1
32
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
8,
7
7
3
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
2
33
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
S
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
22
,
6
2
1
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
3
34
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
21
,
4
0
4
25
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
4
35
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
t
o
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
25
,
6
3
2
25
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
5
36
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
31
,
5
4
9
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
6
37
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
F
r
o
m
B
u
b
b
R
d
t
o
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
5,
9
7
7
25
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
7
38
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
9,
7
5
7
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
8
39
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
9,
6
9
3
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
9
40
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
41
,
7
8
5
40
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
0
41
N
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
18
,
6
4
6
40
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
1
42
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
12
,
4
5
5
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
4
2
43
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
6,
9
6
3
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
4
3
44
B
u
b
b
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
17
,
4
6
5
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
4
45
B
u
b
b
R
d
F
r
o
m
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
7,
3
0
3
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
4
5
46
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
96
,
9
7
6
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
6
47
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
94
,
3
6
2
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
7
48
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
12
3
,
9
3
5
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
8
49
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
92
,
4
5
1
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
9
50
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
92
,
4
5
1
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
5
0
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
u
p
t
e
r
i
n
o
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
No
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
T
O
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
No Project AlternativeCONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS RESULT SUMMARY TABLE
70
dBA CNEL
65
dBA CNEL
60
dBA CNEL
1 Homestead RdFrom City Limit to Highway 85 10,219 66.2 56 120 258
2 Homestead RdFrom Highway 85 to N Stelling Rd 20,443 69.2 88 190 409
3 Homestead RdFrom N Stelling Rd to N De Anza Blvd 24,409 69.9 99 214 461
4 Homestead RdFrom N De Anza Blvd to N Blaney Ave 28,388 70.6 110 236 509
5 Homestead RdFrom N Blaney Ave to N Wolfe Rd 28,919 70.7 111 239 516
6 Homestead RdFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 31,050 71.0 116 251 541
7 Homestead RdFrom N Tantau Ave to City Limit 30,684 70.9 116 249 536
8 Pruneridge AveFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 6,501 64.2 41 88 190
9 Pruneridge AveFrom N Tantau Ave to Lawrence Expwy 19,136 68.9 84 181 390
10 Junipero Serra FwyFrom City Limit to Foothill Blvd 122,539 81.9 620 1,335 2,877
11 Junipero Serra FwyFrom Foothill Blvd to Highway 85 152,732 82.8 718 1,547 3,332
12 Junipero Serra FwyFrom Highway 85 to N Stelling Rd 125,410 82.0 629 1,356 2,922
13 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Stelling Rd to N De Anza Blvd 125,410 82.0 629 1,356 2,922
14 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N De Anza Blvd to N Blaney Ave 133,858 82.3 657 1,416 3,052
15 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Blaney Ave to N Wolfe Rd 123,626 81.9 624 1,343 2,894
16 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 125,636 82.0 630 1,358 2,925
17 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Tantau Ave to I-280 126,743 82.0 634 1,366 2,943
18 Junipero Serra FwyFrom I-280 to Lawrence Expwy 134,567 82.3 660 1,421 3,062
19 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom City Limit to Foothill Blvd 3,673 61.7 28 60 130
20 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom Foothill Blvd to Bubb Rd 18,464 68.7 82 177 382
21 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom Bubb Rd to Highway 85 34,099 71.5 126 272 587
22 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom Highway 85 N Stelling Rd 29,619 70.9 115 248 534
23 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N Stelling Rd to N De Anza Blvd 28,668 70.8 113 243 523
24 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N De Anza Blvd to N Blaney Ave 29,177 70.9 114 246 529
25 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N Blaney Ave to N Wolfe Rd 31,292 71.2 119 257 554
26 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 36,361 71.8 132 284 613
27 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom S Tantau Ave to I-280 34,178 71.5 127 273 588
28 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom I-280 to Lawrence Expwy 41,061 72.3 143 308 664
29 Mcclellan RdFrom Foothill Blvd/Stevens Canyon Rd to Bub 8,303 63.2 35 75 162
30 Mcclellan RdFrom Bubb Rd to Highway 85 8,853 64.5 43 93 201
31 Mcclellan RdFrom Highway 85 to S Stelling Rd 10,021 65.1 47 101 218
32 Mcclellan RdFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 8,773 64.5 43 93 199
33 Bollinger RdFrom S De Anza Blvd to S Blaney Ave 22,621 69.6 94 203 438
34 Bollinger RdFrom S Blaney Ave to Miller Ave 21,404 67.3 66 142 307
35 Bollinger RdFrom Miller Ave to S Tantau Ave 25,632 68.1 75 161 346
36 Bollinger RdFrom S Tantau Ave to Lawrence Expwy 31,549 71.1 118 254 546
37 Rainbow DrFrom Bubb Rd to S Stelling Rd 5,977 61.7 28 61 130
38 Rainbow DrFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 9,757 65.9 54 115 249
39 Prospect RdFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 9,693 65.9 53 115 248
40 Foothill ExpwyFrom City Limit to I-280 41,785 73.2 163 351 755
41 N Foothill BlvdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 18,646 69.7 95 205 441
42 Foothill BlvdFrom McClellan Rd to Stevens Creek Blvd 12,455 66.0 54 117 252
43 Stevens Canyon RdFrom City Limit to McClellan Rd 6,963 63.5 37 79 171
44 Bubb RdFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 17,465 68.5 79 171 368
45 Bubb RdFrom Rainbow Dr to McClellan Rd 7,303 63.7 38 82 176
46 Stevens Creek FwyFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 96,976 80.8 523 1,126 2,427
47 Stevens Creek FwyFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 94,362 80.7 513 1,106 2,383
48 West Valley FwyFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 123,935 81.8 616 1,326 2,858
49 West Valley FwyFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 92,451 80.6 506 1,091 2,350
50 West Valley FwyFrom McClellan Rd to S Stelling Rd 92,451 80.6 506 1,091 2,350
City of Cupterino General Plan Amendment
ROADWAYSEGMENT
DAILY
TRAFIC
VOLUMES
NOISE
LEVEL
AT 100 FT.
(dBA CNEL)
DISTACE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FT.)
#
#
RO
A
D
W
A
Y
S
E
G
M
E
N
T
A
D
T
PO
S
T
E
D
SP
E
E
D
LI
M
I
T
LA
N
E
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
SI
T
E
CO
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
R
O
A
D
C
L
A
S
S
.
GR
A
D
E
(%
)
A
N
A
L
Y
S
T
RO
A
D
CL
A
S
S
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
P
E
E
D
LANE DISTANCE
1
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
92
,
4
5
1
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0%
1
EH
P
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
2
0
2
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
90
,
9
4
7
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
2
Mi
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
2
8
3
H
o
l
l
e
n
b
e
c
k
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
3,
3
3
4
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
4
8
4
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
10
,
4
3
8
30
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
A
6
8
5
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
10
,
4
3
8
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
5
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
B
7
5
6
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
18
,
4
2
5
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
6
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
C
5
5
7
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
4,
7
1
8
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
7
8
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
3,
9
4
3
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
8
9
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
3,
3
1
2
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
9
DA
I
L
Y
H
O
U
R
L
Y
10
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
45
,
1
4
0
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
0
%
A
77.3%DAY78.1%
11
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
55
,
4
6
3
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
1
%
M
T
16.2%EVENING9.1%
12
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
44
,
3
8
5
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
2
%
H
T
6
.
5
%
N
I
G
H
T
1
2
.
9
%
13
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
38
,
9
0
1
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
3
14
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
43
,
5
6
7
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
4
15
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
32
,
4
8
4
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
5
16
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
38
,
9
2
1
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
6
100feet
17
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
35
,
2
5
8
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
7
18
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
7,
2
1
2
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
1
8
19
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
2,
5
7
8
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
1
9
20
S
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
1,
1
3
9
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
0
21
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
2,
6
4
2
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
1
22
S
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
27
,
2
7
5
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
2
23
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
32
,
8
9
6
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
3
24
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
37
,
7
2
0
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
4
25
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
28
,
1
5
8
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
5
26
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
18
,
0
8
3
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
6
27
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
11
,
1
2
6
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
7
28
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
5,
5
8
0
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
8
29
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
3,
1
6
3
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
9
30
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
4,
9
6
1
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
0
31
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
2,
8
5
7
25
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
1
32
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
69
,
6
7
4
50
5
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
C
0
%
3
2
33
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
65
,
4
5
6
50
5
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
C
0
%
3
3
34
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
73
,
0
5
0
50
5
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
C
0
%
3
4
35
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
5
36
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
6
37
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
7
38
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
8
39
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
9
40
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
0
41
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
1
42
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
2
43
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
3
44
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
4
45
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
5
46
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
6
47
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
7
48
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
8
49
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
9
50
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
5
0
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
u
p
t
e
r
i
n
o
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
No
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
T
O
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
No Project AlternativeCONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS RESULT SUMMARY TABLE
70
dBA CNEL
65
dBA CNEL
60
dBA CNEL
1 West Valley FwyFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 92,451 80.6 506 1,091 2,350
2 West Valley FwyFrom S De Anza Blvd to Prospect Rd 90,947 80.5 501 1,079 2,325
3 Hollenbeck AveFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 3,334 60.3 23 49 105
4 N Stelling RdFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 10,438 65.3 48 104 225
5 N Stelling RdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 10,438 65.3 48 104 224
6 S Stelling RdFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 18,425 68.7 82 177 382
7 S Stelling RdFrom McClellan Rd to Highway 85 4,718 62.8 33 71 153
8 S Stelling RdFrom Highway 85 to Rainbow Dr 3,943 62.0 29 63 136
9 S Stelling RdFrom Rainbow Dr to Prospect Rd 3,312 61.2 26 56 121
10 N De Anza BlvdFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 45,140 73.6 175 376 811
11 N De Anza BlvdFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 55,463 74.5 200 432 930
12 N De Anza BlvdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 44,385 73.6 173 372 802
13 S De Anza BlvdFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 38,901 73.0 158 341 734
14 S De Anza BlvdFrom McClellan Rd to Bollinger Rd 43,567 73.5 171 368 792
15 S De Anza BlvdFrom Bollinger Rd to Highway 85 32,484 72.2 140 302 651
16 S De Anza BlvdFrom Highway 85 to Rainbow Dr 38,921 73.0 158 341 735
17 S De Anza BlvdFrom Rainbow Dr to Prospect Rd 35,258 72.6 148 319 688
18 N Blaney AveFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 7,212 63.6 38 81 175
19 N Blaney AveFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 2,578 59.2 19 41 88
20 S Blaney AveFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to Bollinger Rd 1,139 55.6 11 24 51
21 Blaney AveFrom Bollinger Rd to Prospect Rd 2,642 59.3 19 42 90
22 S Wolfe RdFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 27,275 70.4 107 230 496
23 N Wolfe RdFrom Homestead Rd to Pruneridge Ave 32,896 71.2 121 261 562
24 N Wolfe RdFrom Pruneridge Ave to I-280 37,720 71.8 133 286 616
25 N Wolfe RdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 28,158 70.6 109 235 507
26 Miller AveFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to Bollinger Rd 18,083 68.6 81 175 377
27 Miller AveFrom Bollinger Rd to City Limit 11,126 66.5 59 127 273
28 N Tantau AveFrom Homestead Rd to Pruneridge Ave 5,580 63.5 37 80 171
29 N Tantau AveFrom Pruneridge Ave to I-280 3,163 61.0 25 54 117
30 N Tantau AveFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 4,961 63.0 34 74 158
31 S Tantau AveFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to Bollinger Rd 2,857 58.5 17 37 80
32 Lawrence ExpwyFrom Pruneridge Ave to Stevens Creek Blvd 69,674 77.2 300 647 1,394
33 Lawrence ExpwyFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to I-280 65,456 76.9 288 621 1,337
34 Lawrence ExpwyFrom I-280 to Bollinger Rd 73,050 77.4 310 668 1,439
35 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
36 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
37 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
38 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
39 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
40 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
41 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
42 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
43 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
44 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
45 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
46 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
50 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
City of Cupterino General Plan Amendment
ROADWAYSEGMENT
DAILY
TRAFIC
VOLUMES
NOISE
LEVEL
AT 100 FT.
(dBA CNEL)
DISTACE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FT.)
#
........................................................................................................................
LAND USE ALTERNATIVE A
ROADWAY NOISE MODELING
........................................................................................................................
#
RO
A
D
W
A
Y
S
E
G
M
E
N
T
A
D
T
PO
S
T
E
D
SP
E
E
D
LI
M
I
T
LA
N
E
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
SI
T
E
CO
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
R
O
A
D
C
L
A
S
S
.
GR
A
D
E
(%
)
A
N
A
L
Y
S
T
RO
A
D
CL
A
S
S
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
P
E
E
D
LANE DISTANCE
1
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
9,
6
0
3
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
EH
P
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
2
0
2
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
21
,
4
2
6
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
Mi
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
2
8
3
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
29
,
2
1
3
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
4
8
4
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
30
,
0
3
7
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
A
6
8
5
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
30
,
0
5
1
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
5
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
B
7
5
6
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
31
,
8
3
4
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
6
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
C
5
5
7
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
30
,
8
0
5
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
7
8
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
6,
3
6
4
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
8
9
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
18
,
6
1
2
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
9
DA
I
L
Y
H
O
U
R
L
Y
10
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
12
1
,
8
8
2
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
0
%
A
77.3%DAY78.1%
11
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
15
3
,
3
5
2
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
1
%
M
T
16.2%EVENING9.1%
12
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
12
6
,
9
5
0
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
2
%
H
T
6
.
5
%
N
I
G
H
T
1
2
.
9
%
13
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
12
6
,
9
5
0
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
3
14
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
12
4
,
6
1
0
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
4
15
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
12
4
,
6
1
0
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
5
16
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
13
2
,
9
2
2
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
6
100feet
17
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
13
2
,
9
2
2
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
7
18
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
12
6
,
4
2
2
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
8
19
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
3,
6
1
9
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
9
20
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
u
b
b
R
d
18
,
2
2
2
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
0
21
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
B
u
b
b
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
34
,
1
1
5
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
1
22
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
29
,
7
3
0
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
2
23
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
30
,
0
7
7
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
3
24
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
29
,
1
3
4
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
4
25
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
30
,
1
1
6
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
5
26
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
37
,
3
6
0
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
6
27
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
34
,
9
4
6
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
7
28
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
41
,
4
2
3
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
8
29
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
/
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
d
t
o
B
u
b
b
R
d
8,
5
0
0
25
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
9
30
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
B
u
b
b
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
8,
5
2
4
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
0
31
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
9,
7
6
9
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
1
32
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
9,
7
8
0
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
2
33
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
S
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
22
,
7
1
6
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
3
34
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
21
,
4
6
3
25
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
4
35
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
t
o
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
15
,
4
7
0
25
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
5
36
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
31
,
4
9
6
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
6
37
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
F
r
o
m
B
u
b
b
R
d
t
o
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
6,
2
1
4
25
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
7
38
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
9,
8
8
7
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
8
39
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
9,
7
8
3
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
9
40
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
45
,
2
7
3
40
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
0
41
N
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
25
,
3
7
8
40
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
1
42
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
12
,
3
6
0
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
4
2
43
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
6,
9
2
3
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
4
3
44
B
u
b
b
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
17
,
8
6
3
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
4
45
B
u
b
b
R
d
F
r
o
m
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
7,
3
0
0
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
4
5
46
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
99
,
6
1
2
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
6
47
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
93
,
9
7
2
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
7
48
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
10
0
,
4
7
9
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
8
49
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
92
,
0
9
8
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
9
50
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
92
,
0
9
8
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
5
0
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
u
p
t
e
r
i
n
o
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
La
n
d
U
s
e
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
T
O
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
Land Use Alternative ACONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS RESULT SUMMARY TABLE
70
dBA CNEL
65
dBA CNEL
60
dBA CNEL
1 Homestead RdFrom City Limit to Highway 85 9,603 65.9 53 115 247
2 Homestead RdFrom Highway 85 to N Stelling Rd 21,426 69.4 91 196 422
3 Homestead RdFrom N Stelling Rd to N De Anza Blvd 29,213 70.7 112 241 519
4 Homestead RdFrom N De Anza Blvd to N Blaney Ave 30,037 70.8 114 245 529
5 Homestead RdFrom N Blaney Ave to N Wolfe Rd 30,051 70.9 114 246 529
6 Homestead RdFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 31,834 71.1 118 255 550
7 Homestead RdFrom N Tantau Ave to City Limit 30,805 71.0 116 250 538
8 Pruneridge AveFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 6,364 64.1 40 87 187
9 Pruneridge AveFrom N Tantau Ave to Lawrence Expwy 18,612 68.7 82 178 382
10 Junipero Serra FwyFrom City Limit to Foothill Blvd 121,882 81.9 618 1,331 2,867
11 Junipero Serra FwyFrom Foothill Blvd to Highway 85 153,352 82.9 720 1,551 3,341
12 Junipero Serra FwyFrom Highway 85 to N Stelling Rd 126,950 82.0 635 1,367 2,946
13 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Stelling Rd to N De Anza Blvd 126,950 82.0 635 1,367 2,946
14 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N De Anza Blvd to N Blaney Ave 124,610 82.0 627 1,350 2,909
15 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Blaney Ave to N Wolfe Rd 124,610 82.0 627 1,350 2,909
16 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 132,922 82.2 654 1,410 3,037
17 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Tantau Ave to I-280 132,922 82.2 654 1,410 3,037
18 Junipero Serra FwyFrom I-280 to Lawrence Expwy 126,422 82.0 633 1,363 2,938
19 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom City Limit to Foothill Blvd 3,619 61.7 28 60 129
20 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom Foothill Blvd to Bubb Rd 18,222 68.7 82 176 379
21 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom Bubb Rd to Highway 85 34,115 71.5 126 273 587
22 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom Highway 85 N Stelling Rd 29,730 70.9 115 249 536
23 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N Stelling Rd to N De Anza Blvd 30,077 71.0 116 251 540
24 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N De Anza Blvd to N Blaney Ave 29,134 70.8 114 245 529
25 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N Blaney Ave to N Wolfe Rd 30,116 71.0 116 251 540
26 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 37,360 71.9 134 290 624
27 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom S Tantau Ave to I-280 34,946 71.6 129 277 597
28 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom I-280 to Lawrence Expwy 41,423 72.4 144 310 668
29 Mcclellan RdFrom Foothill Blvd/Stevens Canyon Rd to Bub 8,500 63.3 36 77 165
30 Mcclellan RdFrom Bubb Rd to Highway 85 8,524 64.4 42 91 196
31 Mcclellan RdFrom Highway 85 to S Stelling Rd 9,769 65.0 46 99 214
32 Mcclellan RdFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 9,780 65.0 46 100 214
33 Bollinger RdFrom S De Anza Blvd to S Blaney Ave 22,716 69.6 95 204 439
34 Bollinger RdFrom S Blaney Ave to Miller Ave 21,463 67.3 66 143 307
35 Bollinger RdFrom Miller Ave to S Tantau Ave 15,470 65.9 53 115 247
36 Bollinger RdFrom S Tantau Ave to Lawrence Expwy 31,496 71.1 118 253 546
37 Rainbow DrFrom Bubb Rd to S Stelling Rd 6,214 61.9 29 62 134
38 Rainbow DrFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 9,887 66.0 54 116 251
39 Prospect RdFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 9,783 65.9 54 116 249
40 Foothill ExpwyFrom City Limit to I-280 45,273 73.5 172 370 797
41 N Foothill BlvdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 25,378 71.0 117 251 542
42 Foothill BlvdFrom McClellan Rd to Stevens Creek Blvd 12,360 66.0 54 116 251
43 Stevens Canyon RdFrom City Limit to McClellan Rd 6,923 63.5 37 79 170
44 Bubb RdFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 17,863 68.6 81 174 374
45 Bubb RdFrom Rainbow Dr to McClellan Rd 7,300 63.7 38 82 176
46 Stevens Creek FwyFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 99,612 80.9 532 1,147 2,470
47 Stevens Creek FwyFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 93,972 80.6 512 1,103 2,376
48 West Valley FwyFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 100,479 80.9 535 1,153 2,485
49 West Valley FwyFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 92,098 80.6 505 1,088 2,344
50 West Valley FwyFrom McClellan Rd to S Stelling Rd 92,098 80.6 505 1,088 2,344
City of Cupterino General Plan Amendment
ROADWAYSEGMENT
DAILY
TRAFIC
VOLUMES
NOISE
LEVEL
AT 100 FT.
(dBA CNEL)
DISTACE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FT.)
#
#
RO
A
D
W
A
Y
S
E
G
M
E
N
T
A
D
T
PO
S
T
E
D
SP
E
E
D
LI
M
I
T
LA
N
E
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
SI
T
E
CO
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
R
O
A
D
C
L
A
S
S
.
GR
A
D
E
(%
)
A
N
A
L
Y
S
T
RO
A
D
CL
A
S
S
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
P
E
E
D
LANE DISTANCE
1
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
92
,
0
9
7
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0%
1
EH
P
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
2
0
2
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
90
,
6
6
3
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
2
Mi
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
2
8
3
H
o
l
l
e
n
b
e
c
k
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
3,
3
1
4
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
4
8
4
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
11
,
0
9
5
30
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
A
6
8
5
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
11
,
0
9
5
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
5
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
B
7
5
6
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
18
,
9
9
0
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
6
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
C
5
5
7
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
5,
5
6
9
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
7
8
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
4,
8
3
5
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
8
9
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
3,
9
7
5
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
9
DA
I
L
Y
H
O
U
R
L
Y
10
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
43
,
9
9
3
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
0
%
A
77.3%DAY78.1%
11
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
55
,
7
2
4
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
1
%
M
T
16.2%EVENING9.1%
12
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
44
,
1
5
1
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
2
%
H
T
6
.
5
%
N
I
G
H
T
1
2
.
9
%
13
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
38
,
4
8
5
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
3
14
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
43
,
1
2
6
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
4
15
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
33
,
8
0
1
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
5
16
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
39
,
0
4
5
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
6
100feet
17
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
35
,
3
8
9
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
7
18
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
6,
9
7
6
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
1
8
19
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
6,
0
7
7
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
1
9
20
S
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
1,
2
9
4
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
0
21
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
2,
9
3
9
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
1
22
S
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
28
,
0
0
0
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
2
23
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
34
,
4
2
9
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
3
24
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
39
,
3
0
3
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
4
25
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
27
,
7
2
8
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
5
26
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
16
,
1
6
7
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
6
27
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
11
,
3
4
4
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
7
28
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
5,
7
6
0
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
8
29
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
3,
2
5
1
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
9
30
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
4,
9
9
5
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
0
31
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
2,
7
5
3
25
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
1
32
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
85
,
7
1
3
50
5
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
C
0
%
3
2
33
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
65
,
7
7
3
50
5
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
C
0
%
3
3
34
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
60
,
9
7
8
50
5
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
C
0
%
3
4
35
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
5
36
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
6
37
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
7
38
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
8
39
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
9
40
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
0
41
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
1
42
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
2
43
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
3
44
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
4
45
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
5
46
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
6
47
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
7
48
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
8
49
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
9
50
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
5
0
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
u
p
t
e
r
i
n
o
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
La
n
d
U
s
e
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
T
O
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
Land Use Alternative ACONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS RESULT SUMMARY TABLE
70
dBA CNEL
65
dBA CNEL
60
dBA CNEL
1 West Valley FwyFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 92,097 80.6 505 1,088 2,344
2 West Valley FwyFrom S De Anza Blvd to Prospect Rd 90,663 80.5 500 1,077 2,320
3 Hollenbeck AveFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 3,314 60.3 22 48 104
4 N Stelling RdFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 11,095 65.5 50 109 234
5 N Stelling RdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 11,095 65.5 50 108 233
6 S Stelling RdFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 18,990 68.9 84 181 390
7 S Stelling RdFrom McClellan Rd to Highway 85 5,569 63.5 37 79 171
8 S Stelling RdFrom Highway 85 to Rainbow Dr 4,835 62.9 34 72 156
9 S Stelling RdFrom Rainbow Dr to Prospect Rd 3,975 62.0 29 63 137
10 N De Anza BlvdFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 43,993 73.5 172 370 797
11 N De Anza BlvdFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 55,724 74.5 201 433 933
12 N De Anza BlvdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 44,151 73.5 172 371 799
13 S De Anza BlvdFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 38,485 72.9 157 338 729
14 S De Anza BlvdFrom McClellan Rd to Bollinger Rd 43,126 73.4 169 365 787
15 S De Anza BlvdFrom Bollinger Rd to Highway 85 33,801 72.4 144 310 669
16 S De Anza BlvdFrom Highway 85 to Rainbow Dr 39,045 73.0 159 342 736
17 S De Anza BlvdFrom Rainbow Dr to Prospect Rd 35,389 72.6 149 320 690
18 N Blaney AveFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 6,976 63.5 37 79 171
19 N Blaney AveFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 6,077 62.9 34 72 156
20 S Blaney AveFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to Bollinger Rd 1,294 56.2 12 26 56
21 Blaney AveFrom Bollinger Rd to Prospect Rd 2,939 59.7 21 45 96
22 S Wolfe RdFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 28,000 70.5 109 234 505
23 N Wolfe RdFrom Homestead Rd to Pruneridge Ave 34,429 71.4 125 269 579
24 N Wolfe RdFrom Pruneridge Ave to I-280 39,303 72.0 136 294 633
25 N Wolfe RdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 27,728 70.5 108 233 501
26 Miller AveFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to Bollinger Rd 16,167 68.2 75 162 350
27 Miller AveFrom Bollinger Rd to City Limit 11,344 66.6 60 128 276
28 N Tantau AveFrom Homestead Rd to Pruneridge Ave 5,760 63.6 38 81 175
29 N Tantau AveFrom Pruneridge Ave to I-280 3,251 61.2 26 55 120
30 N Tantau AveFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 4,995 63.0 34 74 159
31 S Tantau AveFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to Bollinger Rd 2,753 58.4 17 36 78
32 Lawrence ExpwyFrom Pruneridge Ave to Stevens Creek Blvd 85,713 78.1 345 743 1,600
33 Lawrence ExpwyFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to I-280 65,773 76.9 289 623 1,341
34 Lawrence ExpwyFrom I-280 to Bollinger Rd 60,978 76.6 275 592 1,275
35 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
36 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
37 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
38 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
39 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
40 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
41 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
42 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
43 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
44 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
45 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
46 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
50 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
City of Cupterino General Plan Amendment
ROADWAYSEGMENT
DAILY
TRAFIC
VOLUMES
NOISE
LEVEL
AT 100 FT.
(dBA CNEL)
DISTACE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FT.)
#
........................................................................................................................
LAND USE ALTERNATIVE B
ROADWAY NOISE MODELING
........................................................................................................................
#
RO
A
D
W
A
Y
S
E
G
M
E
N
T
A
D
T
PO
S
T
E
D
SP
E
E
D
LI
M
I
T
LA
N
E
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
SI
T
E
CO
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
R
O
A
D
C
L
A
S
S
.
GR
A
D
E
(%
)
A
N
A
L
Y
S
T
RO
A
D
CL
A
S
S
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
P
E
E
D
LANE DISTANCE
1
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
10
,
5
3
6
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
EH
P
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
2
0
2
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
21
,
4
9
8
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
Mi
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
2
8
3
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
29
,
2
1
0
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
4
8
4
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
29
,
7
1
6
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
A
6
8
5
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
30
,
3
4
2
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
5
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
B
7
5
6
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
32
,
3
6
7
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
6
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
C
5
5
7
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
F
r
o
m
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
30
,
9
1
8
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
7
8
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
6,
8
6
2
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
8
9
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
22
,
1
2
6
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
9
DA
I
L
Y
H
O
U
R
L
Y
10
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
12
1
,
6
4
7
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
0
%
A
77.3%DAY78.1%
11
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
15
2
,
8
8
9
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
1
%
M
T
16.2%EVENING9.1%
12
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
12
7
,
6
0
0
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
2
%
H
T
6
.
5
%
N
I
G
H
T
1
2
.
9
%
13
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
12
7
,
6
0
0
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
3
14
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
12
4
,
8
9
3
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
4
15
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
12
4
,
6
2
6
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
5
16
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
13
2
,
4
8
7
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
6
100feet
17
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
13
2
,
4
8
7
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
7
18
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
o
S
e
r
r
a
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
13
2
,
4
8
7
65
7
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
B
0
%
1
8
19
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
3,
6
7
8
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
9
20
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
u
b
b
R
d
17
,
5
8
9
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
0
21
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
B
u
b
b
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
33
,
3
0
5
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
1
22
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
30
,
4
7
4
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
2
23
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
30
,
0
7
7
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
3
24
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
33
,
2
6
9
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
4
25
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
34
,
6
9
2
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
5
26
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
t
o
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
38
,
3
0
3
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
6
27
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
38
,
1
0
6
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
7
28
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
43
,
2
0
9
35
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
8
29
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
/
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
d
t
o
B
u
b
b
R
d
8,
3
1
2
25
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
9
30
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
B
u
b
b
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
8,
4
1
0
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
0
31
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
9,
8
9
0
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
1
32
M
c
c
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
9,
9
5
9
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
2
33
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
S
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
23
,
3
5
6
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
3
34
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
t
o
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
22
,
1
2
8
25
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
4
35
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
t
o
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
26
,
3
4
6
25
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
5
36
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
t
o
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
31
,
9
0
5
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
3
6
37
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
F
r
o
m
B
u
b
b
R
d
t
o
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
5,
8
8
4
25
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
7
38
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
9,
7
4
1
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
8
39
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
9,
7
7
5
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
9
40
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
59
,
5
4
6
40
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
0
41
N
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
25
,
0
6
3
40
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
1
42
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
12
,
2
3
2
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
4
2
43
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
6,
9
4
1
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
4
3
44
B
u
b
b
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
19
,
0
0
7
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
4
45
B
u
b
b
R
d
F
r
o
m
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
6,
2
6
7
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
4
5
46
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
99
,
0
4
9
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
6
47
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
94
,
7
0
5
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
7
48
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
12
3
,
4
5
7
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
8
49
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
92
,
6
3
9
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
4
9
50
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
92
,
6
3
9
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
5
0
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
u
p
t
e
r
i
n
o
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
La
n
d
U
s
e
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
T
O
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
Land Use Alternative BCONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS RESULT SUMMARY TABLE
70
dBA CNEL
65
dBA CNEL
60
dBA CNEL
1 Homestead RdFrom City Limit to Highway 85 10,536 66.3 57 122 263
2 Homestead RdFrom Highway 85 to N Stelling Rd 21,498 69.4 91 196 423
3 Homestead RdFrom N Stelling Rd to N De Anza Blvd 29,210 70.7 112 241 519
4 Homestead RdFrom N De Anza Blvd to N Blaney Ave 29,716 70.8 113 244 525
5 Homestead RdFrom N Blaney Ave to N Wolfe Rd 30,342 70.9 115 247 532
6 Homestead RdFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 32,367 71.2 120 258 556
7 Homestead RdFrom N Tantau Ave to City Limit 30,918 71.0 116 250 539
8 Pruneridge AveFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 6,862 64.4 42 91 197
9 Pruneridge AveFrom N Tantau Ave to Lawrence Expwy 22,126 69.5 92 199 429
10 Junipero Serra FwyFrom City Limit to Foothill Blvd 121,647 81.9 617 1,329 2,863
11 Junipero Serra FwyFrom Foothill Blvd to Highway 85 152,889 82.8 718 1,548 3,334
12 Junipero Serra FwyFrom Highway 85 to N Stelling Rd 127,600 82.1 637 1,372 2,956
13 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Stelling Rd to N De Anza Blvd 127,600 82.1 637 1,372 2,956
14 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N De Anza Blvd to N Blaney Ave 124,893 82.0 628 1,352 2,914
15 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Blaney Ave to N Wolfe Rd 124,626 82.0 627 1,351 2,910
16 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 132,487 82.2 653 1,407 3,031
17 Junipero Serra FwyFrom N Tantau Ave to I-280 132,487 82.2 653 1,407 3,031
18 Junipero Serra FwyFrom I-280 to Lawrence Expwy 132,487 82.2 653 1,407 3,031
19 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom City Limit to Foothill Blvd 3,678 61.7 28 61 130
20 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom Foothill Blvd to Bubb Rd 17,589 68.5 80 172 370
21 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom Bubb Rd to Highway 85 33,305 71.4 124 268 578
22 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom Highway 85 N Stelling Rd 30,474 71.0 117 253 545
23 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N Stelling Rd to N De Anza Blvd 30,077 71.0 116 251 540
24 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N De Anza Blvd to N Blaney Ave 33,269 71.4 124 268 577
25 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N Blaney Ave to N Wolfe Rd 34,692 71.6 128 276 594
26 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom N Wolfe Rd to N Tantau Ave 38,303 72.0 137 294 634
27 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom S Tantau Ave to I-280 38,106 72.0 136 293 632
28 Stevens Creek BlvdFrom I-280 to Lawrence Expwy 43,209 72.6 148 319 687
29 Mcclellan RdFrom Foothill Blvd/Stevens Canyon Rd to Bub 8,312 63.2 35 75 163
30 Mcclellan RdFrom Bubb Rd to Highway 85 8,410 64.3 42 90 194
31 Mcclellan RdFrom Highway 85 to S Stelling Rd 9,890 65.0 47 100 216
32 Mcclellan RdFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 9,959 65.0 47 101 217
33 Bollinger RdFrom S De Anza Blvd to S Blaney Ave 23,356 69.8 96 208 447
34 Bollinger RdFrom S Blaney Ave to Miller Ave 22,128 67.4 68 146 314
35 Bollinger RdFrom Miller Ave to S Tantau Ave 26,346 68.2 76 164 352
36 Bollinger RdFrom S Tantau Ave to Lawrence Expwy 31,905 71.1 119 256 551
37 Rainbow DrFrom Bubb Rd to S Stelling Rd 5,884 61.7 28 60 129
38 Rainbow DrFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 9,741 65.9 54 115 248
39 Prospect RdFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 9,775 65.9 54 116 249
40 Foothill ExpwyFrom City Limit to I-280 59,546 74.7 206 444 956
41 N Foothill BlvdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 25,063 71.0 116 249 537
42 Foothill BlvdFrom McClellan Rd to Stevens Creek Blvd 12,232 65.9 54 116 249
43 Stevens Canyon RdFrom City Limit to McClellan Rd 6,941 63.5 37 79 171
44 Bubb RdFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 19,007 68.9 84 181 390
45 Bubb RdFrom Rainbow Dr to McClellan Rd 6,267 63.0 34 74 159
46 Stevens Creek FwyFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 99,049 80.9 530 1,142 2,461
47 Stevens Creek FwyFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 94,705 80.7 515 1,109 2,388
48 West Valley FwyFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 123,457 81.8 614 1,323 2,850
49 West Valley FwyFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 92,639 80.6 507 1,092 2,354
50 West Valley FwyFrom McClellan Rd to S Stelling Rd 92,639 80.6 507 1,092 2,354
City of Cupterino General Plan Amendment
ROADWAYSEGMENT
DAILY
TRAFIC
VOLUMES
NOISE
LEVEL
AT 100 FT.
(dBA CNEL)
DISTACE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FT.)
#
Land Use Alternative BCONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS RESULT SUMMARY TABLE
70
dBA CNEL
65
dBA CNEL
60
dBA CNEL
1 West Valley FwyFrom S Stelling Rd to S De Anza Blvd 92,640 80.6 507 1,092 2,354
2 West Valley FwyFrom S De Anza Blvd to Prospect Rd 90,922 80.5 501 1,079 2,324
3 Hollenbeck AveFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 2,964 59.8 21 45 97
4 N Stelling RdFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 12,757 66.2 55 119 257
5 N Stelling RdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 12,757 66.1 55 119 256
6 S Stelling RdFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 19,082 68.9 84 181 391
7 S Stelling RdFrom McClellan Rd to Highway 85 5,170 63.2 35 76 163
8 S Stelling RdFrom Highway 85 to Rainbow Dr 4,624 62.7 33 70 151
9 S Stelling RdFrom Rainbow Dr to Prospect Rd 3,422 61.4 27 57 124
10 N De Anza BlvdFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 43,719 73.5 171 368 794
11 N De Anza BlvdFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 56,444 74.6 203 437 941
12 N De Anza BlvdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 46,943 73.8 179 386 832
13 S De Anza BlvdFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to McClellan Rd 40,945 73.2 164 353 760
14 S De Anza BlvdFrom McClellan Rd to Bollinger Rd 44,178 73.5 172 371 799
15 S De Anza BlvdFrom Bollinger Rd to Highway 85 35,921 72.6 150 323 696
16 S De Anza BlvdFrom Highway 85 to Rainbow Dr 45,469 73.7 176 378 815
17 S De Anza BlvdFrom Rainbow Dr to Prospect Rd 36,434 72.7 151 326 703
18 N Blaney AveFrom Homestead Rd to I-280 7,041 63.5 37 80 172
19 N Blaney AveFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 5,878 62.8 33 71 153
20 S Blaney AveFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to Bollinger Rd 1,475 56.8 13 28 61
21 Blaney AveFrom Bollinger Rd to Prospect Rd 3,349 60.3 23 49 105
22 S Wolfe RdFrom City Limit to Homestead Rd 28,845 70.7 111 239 515
23 N Wolfe RdFrom Homestead Rd to Pruneridge Ave 33,746 71.4 123 265 572
24 N Wolfe RdFrom Pruneridge Ave to I-280 39,944 72.1 138 297 639
25 N Wolfe RdFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 30,916 71.0 116 250 539
26 Miller AveFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to Bollinger Rd 20,403 69.2 88 190 409
27 Miller AveFrom Bollinger Rd to City Limit 12,138 66.9 62 134 289
28 N Tantau AveFrom Homestead Rd to Pruneridge Ave 7,176 64.6 44 94 203
29 N Tantau AveFrom Pruneridge Ave to I-280 3,876 61.9 29 62 134
30 N Tantau AveFrom I-280 to Stevens Creek Blvd 6,781 64.4 42 91 195
31 S Tantau AveFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to Bollinger Rd 2,837 58.5 17 37 79
32 Lawrence ExpwyFrom Pruneridge Ave to Stevens Creek Blvd 68,153 77.1 296 638 1,374
33 Lawrence ExpwyFrom Stevens Creek Blvd to I-280 70,133 77.2 302 650 1,400
34 Lawrence ExpwyFrom I-280 to Bollinger Rd 74,541 77.5 314 677 1,458
35 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
36 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
37 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
38 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
39 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
40 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
41 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
42 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
43 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
44 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
45 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
46 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
50 00 0 #NUM!#NUM!#NUM!#NUM!
City of Cupterino General Plan Amendment
ROADWAYSEGMENT
DAILY
TRAFIC
VOLUMES
NOISE
LEVEL
AT 100 FT.
(dBA CNEL)
DISTACE TO NOISE CONTOUR (FT.)
#
#
RO
A
D
W
A
Y
S
E
G
M
E
N
T
A
D
T
PO
S
T
E
D
SP
E
E
D
LI
M
I
T
LA
N
E
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
SI
T
E
CO
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
R
O
A
D
C
L
A
S
S
.
GR
A
D
E
(%
)
A
N
A
L
Y
S
T
RO
A
D
CL
A
S
S
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
P
E
E
D
LANE DISTANCE
1
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
t
o
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
92
,
6
4
0
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0%
1
EH
P
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
2
0
2
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
F
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
90
,
9
2
2
65
6
8
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
A
0
%
2
Mi
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
2
8
3
H
o
l
l
e
n
b
e
c
k
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
2,
9
6
4
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
4
8
4
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
12
,
7
5
7
30
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
4
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
A
6
8
5
N
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
12
,
7
5
7
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
5
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
B
7
5
6
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
19
,
0
8
2
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
6
Fr
e
e
w
a
y
C
5
5
7
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
5,
1
7
0
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
7
8
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
4,
6
2
4
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
8
9
S
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
d
F
r
o
m
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
3,
4
2
2
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
9
DA
I
L
Y
H
O
U
R
L
Y
10
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
43
,
7
1
9
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
0
%
A
77.3%DAY78.1%
11
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
56
,
4
4
4
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
1
%
M
T
16.2%EVENING9.1%
12
N
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
46
,
9
4
3
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
2
%
H
T
6
.
5
%
N
I
G
H
T
1
2
.
9
%
13
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
40
,
9
4
5
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
3
14
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
44
,
1
7
8
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
4
15
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
35
,
9
2
1
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
5
16
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
45
,
4
6
9
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
6
100feet
17
S
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
l
v
d
F
r
o
m
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
D
r
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
36
,
4
3
4
40
4
8
S
o
f
t
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
1
7
18
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
7,
0
4
1
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
1
8
19
N
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
5,
8
7
8
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
1
9
20
S
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
1,
4
7
5
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
0
21
B
l
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
P
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
R
d
3,
3
4
9
30
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
1
22
S
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
28
,
8
4
5
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
2
23
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
33
,
7
4
6
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
3
24
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
39
,
9
4
4
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
4
25
N
W
o
l
f
e
R
d
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
30
,
9
1
6
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
5
26
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
20
,
4
0
3
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
6
27
M
i
l
l
e
r
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
t
o
C
i
t
y
L
i
m
i
t
12
,
1
3
8
35
2
8
S
o
f
t
M
i
n
o
r
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
0
%
2
7
28
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
d
t
o
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
7,
1
7
6
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
8
29
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
3,
8
7
6
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
2
9
30
N
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
6,
7
8
1
35
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
0
31
S
T
a
n
t
a
u
A
v
e
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
2,
8
3
7
25
2
0
S
o
f
t
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
0
%
3
1
32
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
P
r
u
n
e
r
i
d
g
e
A
v
e
t
o
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
68
,
1
5
3
50
5
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
C
0
%
3
2
33
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
l
v
d
t
o
I
-
2
8
0
70
,
1
3
3
50
5
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
C
0
%
3
3
34
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
w
y
F
r
o
m
I
-
2
8
0
t
o
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
d
74
,
5
4
1
50
5
5
S
o
f
t
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
C
0
%
3
4
35
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
5
36
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
6
37
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
7
38
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
8
39
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
3
9
40
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
0
41
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
1
42
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
2
43
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
3
44
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
4
45
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
5
46
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
6
47
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
7
48
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
8
49
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
4
9
50
#N
/
A
S
o
f
t
0
%
5
0
Ci
t
y
o
f
C
u
p
t
e
r
i
n
o
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
La
n
d
U
s
e
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
VEHICLE MIX INPUTS
DI
S
T
A
N
C
E
T
O
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
........................................................................................................................
APPENDIX F:
PUBLIC SERVICES DATA
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
RESPONSES
Response to Environmental Impact Questions/cmr/04.24.14
Santa Clara County Fire Department Responses for Environmental Impact Report
Questions from the City of Cupertino
Question
1. Santa Clara County Fire Department (SCCFD) has jurisdictional responsibility
for all of Cupertino.
2. SCCFD has an agreement with the cities of San Jose, Santa Clara, and Sunnyvale
for Mutual Aid into the city of Cupertino in the event of a large emergency.
3. An emergency evacuation/response plan was created several years ago and is
currently being updated by Santa Clara County’s Emergency Service
Coordinator.
4. SCCFD has a policy for crews to annually inspect each public and private
hydrant. Generally the inspections will begin each year after April 1st and be
completed by July 31. Hydrant flow-tests are conducted on a 4-year rotational
basis and is performed at the same time as the maintenance inspection. During
drought years hydrant flow testing is suspended.
5. SCCFD has response time performance measures we aspire to.
Ø First unit arrives in less than 7 minutes 90% of the time. 2013 Result: 89.4%
Ø For EMS calls: A fire company with a minimum of one paramedic arrives in
under 7 minutes, at least 90% of the time. 2013 Result: 90.4%
Ø
6. The standards for fire hydrants are based on tables in Appendix B and C in the
currently adopted addition of the California Fire Code. The California Fire Code
is based on International Code Council (ICC) model codes.
7. There are 512 hydrants in the city of Cupertino owned by Cal Water and
additional 391 owned by San Jose Water Company.
8. The contact person for Operations is Deputy Chief Joe Parker and for the Fire
Prevention Division it is Deputy Chief John Justice.
9. County Fire responded to 15,929 emergency calls during 2013. The breakdown
of the nature of the calls is:
§ EMS 11,523 (72%)
§ Fire Alarm 1,880 (12%)
§ Fires 1,201 (8%)
§ Service Calls 1,030 (6%)
§ Hazardous Materials 89 (1%)
§ Rescues 206 (1%)
10. The proposed budget for FY is $94.76 million.
11. There are no impact fees for the Fire District at this time.
Response to Environmental Impact Questions/cmr/04.24.14
12. The Department offers many programs:
§ The Department is a leader in emergency medical services and there is an
ALS First Responder on each fire company.
§ The Department is one of the few fire agencies in the Bay Area to staff two
full time fire investigator positions augmented by on-call personnel.
§ The Department has a Hazardous Materials Response Team, which is one
component of the Special Operations Task Force.
§ The Special Operations Task Force companies that consist of four of our units
provide urban Search and Rescue (USAR) services.
§ SCCFD is the only department that has five wildland engines and each
company is trained and equipped to provide structure protection and initial
attack on wildland incidents.
§ Special Operations Task Force personnel are also trained at various levels to
respond to and mitigate various types of technical rescue responses such as
confined space rescue, swift water rescue, high angle rescue, and low angle
rescue.
§ The SCCFD provides community education programs to the cities we serve
and that includes the city of Cupertino.
13. There are three fire stations in the city of Cupertino:
• Cupertino Fire Station – 20215 Stevens Creek Blvd.
• Seven Springs Fire Station – 21000 Sevens Springs Parkway
• Monte Vista Fire Station – 22620 Stevens Creek Blvd.
SCCFD operates an additional twelve stations that are slated to provide service
throughout the district (including Cupertino) during a significant event. The
closest units are dispatched to the event with other units used to back-fill
stations. Cupertino Fire Station is a “core” station and is always back-filled no
matter how many events are taking place.
14. County Fire has 297 employees and daily staffs 64 firefighters and officers
operating out of 15 fire stations with 19 pieces of apparatus and 3 command
vehicles. The fire suppression force is augmented by 18 trained volunteer
firefighters. We currently serve the communities of Campbell, Cupertino, Los
Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Saratoga, and adjacent
unincorporated areas.
15. Cupertino Fire Station has one fire engine staffed with a captain, firefighter, and
firefighter/paramedic and one fire truck staffed with one captain, two
firefighters, and one firefighter/paramedic. There is also one unstaffed fire
engine kept available for mutual aid deployment throughout California, and one
wildland engine that can be cross staffed by one of the aforementioned crews for
vegetation fires.
Seven Springs Fire Station has one fire engine staffed with a captain, firefighter,
and firefighter/paramedic, one Haz Mat Unit staffed with a captain and
firefighter/paramedic, one breathing support unit staffed with two firefighters
and one command vehicle staffed with one Battalion Chief.
Response to Environmental Impact Questions/cmr/04.24.14
Monta Vista Fire Station has one fire engine staffed with a captain, firefighter,
and firefighter/paramedic. There is also a wildland engine that can be cross-
staffed by the crew for vegetation fires
* All personnel are trained to at least the EMT level
16. The minimum staffing levels in Cupertino is seven at Cupertino Station, eight at
Seven Springs Station and three at Monta Vista Station.
17. It is correct that the average response time goal is less than 7 minutes 90 percent
of the time. See number #five for the 2013 results.
18, 19, 20
The facilities, mobile equipment and staffing levels are all adequate to meet
current demands for fire protection services.
21. There are no plans for relocation or expansion of the three fire stations located in
the City of Cupertino.
22, 23
SCCFD does not foresee a need to construct or expand facilities nor increase staffing
levels at the fire stations to serve the response needs of the proposed project.
24. It is likely that specialized “in-plant” type fire and EMS response vehicles will be
needed on site at the main building to facilitate moving firefighters and
equipment from the main entrance or loading dock area to the site of the actual
emergency, and for transporting a patient out to the waiting ambulance. Since
this specialized equipment would be specific to the site, we assume the project
owners would fund it.
25. SCCFD does not currently foresee the need for a new or expanded facility. Of
course, as plans come to fruition and the potential impact of increased
population and the project itself are realized, this may need to be re-evaluated.
Demands on fire protection/EMS services can vary depending on building
features and the overall makeup of the population served.
26. We are concerned about additional traffic and the need for an Emergency Vehicle
Preemption (EVP) system to allow priority movement for responding fire and
EMS apparatus. We are also concerned about any security devices or systems
that would further inhibit our timely access to the buildings and individuals
therein. Barriers, gates, secure doors, and other “choke points” designed to keep
out the unwanted also serve to keep out first responders.
27. This questionnaire, along with any information gleaned from documents on
sccfd.org website should be sufficient in preparing the fire protection portion of
the environmental impact report.
........................................................................................................................
OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
RESPONSES
........................................................................................................................
CITY OF CUPERTINO
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
RESPONSES
........................................................................................................................
SANTA CLARA COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT
RESPONSES
........................................................................................................................
SCHOOLS SERVING THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RESPONSES
SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
AND FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ALTERNATIVES
Prepared for:
Prepared by:
SCHOOLHOUSE SERVICES
June 2014
_______________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services i June 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Summary
Section 1 Regulatory Context
1.1. Education Code Section 17620
1.2. Senate Bill 50
1.3. Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Section 66000-66008)
Section 2 School Facility Standards
2.1. Classrooms
2.2. Other School Buildings
2.3. Land Area
2.4. Accessibility
Section 3 Local School Districts (introduction)
Section 4 Cupertino Union School District (CUSD)
4.1. Current Conditions
4.2. Enrollment Projections
4.2.1. Housing Projections
4.2.2. Enrollment from New Units
4.2.3. Enrollment from All Units
4.3. Enrollment Capacities
4.3.1. District-wide Capacity
4.3.2. Capacities by School
4.4. Enrollment Compared to Capacities
4.4.1. Elementary Schools
4.4.2. Middle Schools
4.5. Fiscal Impacts
4.5.1. Facilities Costs
4.5.2. Development Impact Fee Revenues
4.5.3. Operating Costs
4.5.4. Operating Revenues
4.5.5. Additional Financial Considerations
Section 5 Fremont Union High School District (FUHSD)
5.1. Current Conditions
5.2. Enrollment Projection (for alternatives)
5.3. Enrollment Capacities
5.3.1. Capacities by School
5.3.2. Enrollment compared to capacities (stressed schools)
5.3.3. Facility Improvement Plans
5.4. Fiscal Impacts
5.4.1. Facilities Costs
5.4.2. Development Impact Fee Revenues
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services ii June 2014
5.4.3. Operating Costs
5.4.4. Operating Revenues
5.4.5. Additional Financial Considerations
Section 6 Santa Clara Unified School District (SCUSD)
6.1. Current Conditions
6.2. Enrollment Projections
6.3. Fiscal Impacts
6.3.1. Capital Facilities Cost and Revenue Impacts
6.3.2. Operating Cost and Revenue Impacts
6.3.3. Operating Costs
6.3.4. Operating Revenues
6.3.5. Additional Financial Considerations
_______________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 1 June 2014
SUMMARY
The City of Cupertino, except for a small area, is served by the Cupertino Union School District
(CUSD), grades kindergarten through eight, and the Fremont Union High School District
(FUHSD), grades nine through twelve. The small remaining area in the northeast corner is
served for all grades by the Santa Clara Unified School District (SCUSD).
CUSD and FUHSD have extremely good reputations. This attracts families and thus student
generation is very high in Cupertino housing units. CUSD enrollment has grown tremendously,
particularly in the northeastern portion of the District, resulting in the number of students
residing in the northeastern school attendance areas exceeding the capacity of the schools. Many
students from the areas attend, mostly by choice, alternative programs in other less stressed
schools in the southern portion of the District. The surge in enrollment in CUSD has been
primarily in the younger grades and these larger classes are just now entering the middle school
grades. Looking further ahead, in the five years from 2015 to 2020 high school enrollment at
FUHSD is projected to increase by over 1,000 students.
The City of Cupertino has few vacant parcels. New residential units will generally result from
redevelopment of underutilized sites. The large majority of new units will be small expensive
units; these will be less attractive to young families than other housing alternatives, but will still
have a fairly high student generation.
Four alternatives are analyzed in this report. The existing General Plan and Alternative A are the
same for residential development. Alternatives B and C change the General Plan designation and
zoning for some sites to make more units possible. The impacts of the potential development of
each site are projected, along with an estimate of the portion that might take place in the period
2015 to 2023 which is relevant to the City of Cupertino’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation.
Enrollment from New Units
*SCUSD enrollment impacts are relatively small, possibly either positive or negative.
Existing
Conditions
Minimal
Growth
A
Moderate
Growth
B
Most
Growth
C
By 2023
Number of Units 1,1401,1401,060 1,993
CUSD Students 365365339638
FUHSD Students 808074140
Total Students* 445445413778
All Units
Number of Units 1,8951,8953,316 4,421
CUSD Students 5905909491,151
FUHSD Students 129129208252
Total Students* 7197191,157 1,403
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 2 June 2014
The table above shows the potential number of units in each alternative and the resulting
enrollments they generate. (No enrollment impact from SCUSD is shown, as it would be small
and possibly negative.) The projections are based on the rates of generation of apartments built
since 1995 in Cupertino, which have relatively small number of middle and high school students
in them. The largest numbers of potential units and students are in the Garden Gate and Collins
elementary school attendance areas, in the Lawson Middle School area, and in the Cupertino and
Monta Vista High School areas. Collins and Garden Gate Elementary Schools and Cupertino
High are, or will be, among the schools with the greatest enrollment stress. The projected
student enrollment from the new units is a small fraction of the projected student enrollment
from the existing units in the City.
The table below shows the fiscal impacts of the potential development. The capital costs to add
capacity is significant, as construction costs for two story buildings are high and the development
fees cover only twenty-some percent of the costs. The picture would be a little bit better if
impact fee revenue from a balanced amount of non-residential development were included.
Supplemental mitigation, in the form of funding assistance on projects or contributions of land or
building space would lower the capital facilities deficits.
For CUSD, operating revenues increase about proportionately with costs, so the impact of
additional students is small. For FUHSD, property tax revenues are large, while the operating
expenses are more modest due to the low secondary school student generation of small
apartments. FUHSD’s annual net operating revenues would be even higher if an estimate of
property taxes from a balanced amount of non-residential property were included.
Fiscal Impacts (in $ millions)
* SCUSD receives large capital facilities and operating revenue benefits if development is significant.
Existing
Conditions
Minimal
Growth
A
Moderate
Growth
B
Most
Growth
C
Net Capital Facilities Cost Deficit*
By 2023
CUSD $8.76$8.76$8.13 $15.31
FUHSD $4.02$4.02$3.71 $7.03
All Units
CUSD $14.15 $14.15 $22.79 $27.61
FUHSD $6.47 $6.47 $10.44 $12.65
Annual Net Operating Revenues*
By 2023
CUSD smallsmallsmall small
FUHSD $1.33 $1.33 $1.24 $2.33
All Units
CUSD smallsmallsmall small
FUHSD $2.16 $2.16 $3.48 $4.21
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 3 June 2014
1. STATE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
1.1. Education Code Section 17620
Education Code Section 17620 has allowed school districts to levy development impact fees
since 1987. Like all fees, they cannot exceed the fiscal impact on the school district. The
amounts of these fees, now termed Level 1 fees, are further limited by Government Code Section
65995(b), amounts which are adjusted for inflation in January of every other year. The current
limits, last adjusted on January 22, 2014 are $3.36 per square foot of assessable space for
residential development and $0.54 per square foot of chargeable and enclosed space for
commercial/industrial (most non-residential) development. The residential fee was intended to
provide about half of the cost of schools, though in a large number of cases it does not do so.
When a geographical area is served by an elementary district and a high school district, rather
than by a unified district, the districts negotiate the sharing of the maximum fee amounts.
1.2. Senate Bill 50
Senate Bill 50 (SB 50), approved in 1998, limits the power of cities and counties to require
mitigation of school facilities impacts as a condition of approving new development; it provides
instead for an assumption of State responsibility. Specifically, according to Section 65995(3)(h),
the payment of statutory fees is “deemed to be full and complete mitigation of the impacts of any
legislative or adjudicative act, or both, involving, but not limited to, the planning, use, or
development of real property, or any change in governmental organization or reorganization [...]
on the provision of adequate school facilities.”
The Bill also provides for alternative fees, termed Level 2 and Level 3 fees, which are more
often than not higher than the limits on Level 1 fees. These fees require that a district meet
eligibility tests before being able to levy the fees, sets no limit on residential fee amounts, and
provides for more specificity on how fiscal impacts are determined. The large majority of
California school districts are not eligible to levy these fees. Level 2 fees continue the
perspective of equal local/State sharing with State 50% grants and thus determine the fees equal
to half of the fiscal impact. Level 3 fees come into play only when the State has no funding and
thus is not funding matching grants; in that case, the fee can be equal to the full fiscal impact.
1.3. Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code 66000-66008)
Enacted as AB 1600, the Mitigation Fee Act requires a local agency establishing or increasing an
impact fee as a condition of development to identify the purpose of the fee and the use to which
the fee is to be put. The agency must also demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fee
and the purpose for which it is charged, and between the fee and the type of development project
on which it is to be levied. This Act became enforceable on January 1, 1989. It applies to
impact fees levied by any public agency, not just school districts.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 4 June 2014
2. SCHOOL FACILITY STANDARDS
School facilities are subject to multiple standards. Many derive from State legal or
administrative regulations. Others reflect policy decisions by the local school district. And
many are based on common expectations.
There are several areas of facility standards. Addressed here are classrooms, academic support
rooms, administration space, and other (including physical education facilities, assembly space
(commonly general purpose in nature), cafeteria kitchen and lunchroom space, etc.)
2.1. Classrooms
Classroom Loading (Class Size)
Enrollment capacity reflects the number of classrooms available and the average number of
students in the classrooms, often referred to as student loading. Districts employ several
different classroom loading standards, reflecting both state-level requirements, local district
policies and the level of anticipated long-term state funding. The maximum sizes set by State
regulations for classes are absolute minimums and usually do not come into play.
The State of California funds a class size reduction program that subsidizes a portion of the cost
of class size reduction in kindergarten through third grade and most districts participate in this
program. The standard built into the program was formerly a maximum of 20 students per
homeroom. Due to financial and classroom capacity constraints, however, the State is now
transitioning to an increased maximum size in the kindergarten through third grade class size
reduction program, raising class sizes in these grades up to a maximum of 24 students in these
grades. Almost all California districts are planning to meet this standard. It can be noted that
some districts plan on having some or all of its kindergarten classrooms on double session
scheduling, a morning class followed by an afternoon class. This creates increased enrollment
capacity in the kindergarten rooms. It is not generally popular, however, as the afternoon young
students, often being used to napping in the afternoon, are not as responsive.
The most common standards for grades four through 12 are in the range of an average of 27 to
30 students per class, with the standards frequently varying between the remaining elementary
grades, middle (junior high) school grades, and high school grades. At the high school level,
individual classes vary significantly from the average depending on the nature of the class, with
larger classes for band and choral (for example) and smaller classes for many Advanced
Placement (AP) classes.
In addition to regular education classrooms, State law requires Special Day Classes (SDC) for
special education students. The special education program provides highly specialized
instruction employing teams of specially credentialed teachers and aides for students with
learning disabilities. It requires dedicated classroom space with a smaller class size. California
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 5 June 2014
State regulations use nine students per class for classes for severely challenged students and 13
students per class for non-severely challenged students.
Loading Adjustments
It is the standard of essentially all California school districts that school teachers have some time
each day as a preparation period. At the secondary (middle and high school) level, students
usually rotate among classrooms to teachers who teach the different subjects; teachers then have
a period in which they are not scheduled to teach. The districts and the teachers prefer that
teachers remain in their rooms during this period. It avoids the difficulty of teachers moving
from their room and the necessity of providing a room with desks for teachers to use during their
preparation period. Perhaps even more important, teachers often meet with a student (or group
of students) or a parent during this period and this is difficult without the teacher’s homeroom
being available.
These reductions in capacity are to a large extent offset, however, by physical education classes.
Elementary and middle school students and high school freshman and sophomore students are
generally required to have one period of physical education each day. Students do not occupy
classroom space for the period they are at physical education. This increases capacity by
allowing teachers to remain in their home room during teacher preparation period. Therefore, no
adjustment is necessary for elementary and middle schools.
For the two high school grades (grades 11 and 12) for which students are not required to
participate in physical education classes, however, the effect of the teacher preparation period is
not balanced by students in such classes. The combined effect of physical education classes,
which typically increases capacity by 17% for up to half the student body (some students elect to
participate in physical education for more than two years) and teacher prep periods, which
reduces classroom availability by 17%, is typically a reduction of about 10% in average student
loading and thus in student capacity.
Classroom Size
The common expectation is that most general purpose classrooms will have about 1,000 square
feet; a typical size is 24 feet by 40 feet. Science labs will generally be larger and band/choral
rooms will be even larger. When counting classrooms for new construction funding assistance,
the State includes all classrooms greater than 700 square feet, though a classroom of that size is
marginal for an average class and State total floor area funding standards reflect average
classroom sizes of approximately 1,000 square feet.
Classroom Counts
The count of available classrooms for the purpose of determining enrollment capacity does not
include rooms used for other than classroom purposes. Thus libraries, administration space,
assembly halls (often general purpose), etc. are not included even if the room, e.g. now a library,
was built in the form of a classroom.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 6 June 2014
The condition of classrooms is also essential, including whether they are significantly
deteriorated and whether they lack up-to-date technology resources. The criterion is whether
they will be suitable for use a decade or so into the future. Older modulars are particularly likely
to require replacement or renovation. (The words modulars, portables and relocatables are used
interchangeably in this report.) New relocatable classrooms are often of superior quality, but
relocatables manufactured 20 or more years ago were typically of poorer quality than is typical
of rooms manufactured more recently. The total number of portable classrooms can also be a
consideration. The California School Facility Program (SFP) provides funding assistance to
districts with fairly severe capacity constraints. In determining district needs, it does not count
portables above 25% of classrooms of permanent construction; this standard implies that it may
not be appropriate for portable classrooms to be more than 20% of total classrooms in a district.
Occupancy and use of classrooms is also important. Students will not be able to be assigned to
all of the classrooms. Some will be used as academic support classrooms, including music and
art rooms, computer and language labs, rooms used for counseling and intervention, and rooms
used for programs such as the Resource Specialists Program (RSP). The relevance to enrollment
capacity is that these rooms are used by classes or by other groups of students that are
temporarily out of their “home room.” The standard at elementary schools for support
classrooms is usually to have two or three rooms for academic support activities. The
consideration of academic support rooms can be considerably more complex at secondary
schools. The enrollment is usually larger but if the students rotate among classrooms, their use
of support rooms is sometimes part of their regular schedule, in which case the room functions as
a home room. A computer lab, for example, might be a support room in an elementary school
but function as a room for computer classes in a high school.
Classroom Use Efficiency
The District’s total theoretical capacity is determined by multiplying the number of classrooms
available by the average number of students in a single classroom. The number of students per
classroom is set by the classroom-loading standards established above. Thus, for example, 100
non-SDC classrooms multiplied by a non-SDC blended loading standard of 25.0 students yields
a capacity for 2,500 non-SDC elementary students.
It is difficult, if not impossible, for a district to utilize each classroom at full capacity under
typical loading and usage standards as described above. One obstacle to maximizing capacity at
a school is that the number of students in a grade is not likely to be an exact multiple of the class
size standard. For example, if there are 72 fifth grade students, they cannot be apportioned into
classes each with a standard of 27 students. The classes either have to average 24 students or 36
students. Fairly often a combination class is created, e.g. consisting of both of fourth and fifth
graders, though that similarly is not likely to result in classes of exactly 27 students.
Combination classes create teaching challenges and are thus an educational compromise; on the
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 7 June 2014
other hand, they are essential if all teachers at a grade level are going to have approximately the
same number of students.
Another barrier in maximizing classroom loading and usage is that students are not
geographically spread among attendance areas in a manner exactly proportional to the enrollment
capacity at each campus. In the absence of an evenly distributed student population, operating at
theoretical capacity would require either capping enrollment at most schools or continuously
changing attendance boundaries. Neither of these options is desirable.
Finally, another factor is present in secondary schools. Special purpose rooms, such as science
laboratories, music and art rooms, shop, etc., often cannot be scheduled for every period. The
members of a school band probably are in band class only an hour or two each day. Even if
there is a school chorus that also uses the room, it is unlikely that the room would be scheduled
for a full class each period. And, without desks, the room cannot be used for English, math, etc.
classes. Also, classes in specialized topics (e.g., auto repair) or A.P. classes may typically have
fewer students than the standard.
In light of these practical classroom loading and usage assumptions, the maximum theoretical
capacity needs to be multiplied by a factor that reduces the gross capacity to a more practical
level. The most common planning standards are a reduction of five percent for elementary
school enrollment capacity, 10 percent middle school capacity, and 15 percent for high school
capacity. It should be noted, however, that the circumstances affecting efficiency vary among
districts and that high school efficiency is particularly complex.
2.2. Other School Buildings
Schools require many buildings other than classrooms. An analysis of these buildings and the
activities they accommodate is not particularly relevant to this report. However, an awareness of
the standards for total floor space is relevant, as it affects the cost of constructing additional
school enrollment capacity.
Two sources are cited here to provide perspective on school space standards. The California
School Facility Program (SFP) provides funding assistance to districts with fairly severe capacity
constraints. The floor area standards are 73, 80 and 95 square feet for elementary, middle and
high school students respectively. There is general agreement that these are minimal standards,
intended partially to spread limited State funds as far as possible.
The California Department of Education (CDE) published a report called Complete Schools that
addressed school space needs. It provided data about the median space per student for school
construction projects nationwide. The medians were 90, 111, and 153 square feet for
elementary, middle and high schools. The report noted that weather influenced the square feet
provided, as in areas with cold winters indoor corridors and second floors were much more
common. It nevertheless concluded that the California SFP standards were significantly below
what districts nationwide considered appropriate.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 8 June 2014
2.3. Land Area
The California Department of Education publishes the Guide to School Site Analysis and
Development. The latest update was published in 2000. The recommended land areas for the
different grade levels at different size schools are shown in tables on pages 20-25 of that report.
The guidelines for elementary schools with 500-700 student enrollments are about 11.0 to 12.0
acres per school. Similarly, the guidelines for middle schools and high schools are about 24
acres and 50 acres for 1,000 and 2,000 student schools respectively.
2.4. Accessibility
It would be desirable for all elementary students to be able to walk to school and middle and high
school students to at least be able to bike to school. This usually becomes impossible if students
attend a school other than the attendance area in which they reside; this is commonly referred to
as an intra-district transfer. In many cases the transfer is to enable the student’s participation in a
special program, such as language immersion or STEM (a science and math based curriculum)
and is preferred by the student and the student’s family. In other cases, the transfer is necessary
because capacity is not available in the attendance area’s school. In other words, if growth
results in enrollment overloading schools in a portion of the district, and students have to be
assigned to schools elsewhere in the district, it can be a significant disadvantage, both because of
the inaccessibility inconvenience and the separation from neighborhood playmates.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 9 June 2014
3. LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICTS (INTRODUCTION)
The City of Cupertino (City), except a very small area in the northeast corner, is served by two
school districts, one an elementary district providing grades kindergarten through eight and the
other a high school district. The elementary district, Cupertino Union School District (CUSD
and the Cupertino District), also serves an area that includes portions of Los Altos, San Jose,
Santa Clara and Saratoga and some unincorporated area. About 44% of the District’s students
reside in the City of Cupertino. The geographical area served by the District includes few
undeveloped parcels. However, the value of space for commercial and, especially, residential
use is strong and thus a significant amount of redevelopment is taking place.
The Fremont Union High School District (FUHSD) serves all of the area served by the Cupertino
Union School District plus an equivalent area to the North, predominantly in the City of
Sunnyvale. Almost all of FUHSD students reside in either the Cupertino Union or Sunnyvale
Elementary School Districts, with about 32% residing in the former. The Sunnyvale District area
has more sites easily available for redevelopment and more new units are projected to be built in
that portion of FUHSD.
Both school districts have very high reputations, with the schools in the City of Cupertino area in
particular considered among most the most highly valued in the state. These reputations are a
major reason for the very high real estate values within the two districts.
Enrollment in both districts have been growing steadily. The growth has been primarily outside
of the City of Cupertino, in the elementary school attendance areas primarily to the north in
Sunnyvale (especially Stocklmeir) and to the east (primarily De Vargas) in San Jose.
The small area in the northeast corner not served by CUSD and FUHSD is located within the
boundaries of the Santa Clara Unified School District. The Santa Clara District is a medium size
district; as a unified district its 15,394 students (in the fall of 2013) are spread from kindergarten
through high school. The center of the District is the City of Santa Clara, but its territory extends
from Cupertino and Sunnyvale in the north to San Jose in the south.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 10 June 2014
4. CUPERTINO UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT (CUSD)
4.1. Current Conditions
The District operates 25 schools, 20 elementary schools and five middle schools. The
elementary schools serve kindergarten though third grade students, except for McAuliffe which
includes grades kindergarten through eight. The middle schools serve sixth through eighth grade
students.
Seventeen elementary schools and all five middle schools have designated attendance areas, with
the students residing in an area by default assigned to the school in that area, referred to here as
resident enrollment for each school. However, due to many schools having resident enrollments
in excess of reasonable capacity, in some neighborhoods many students attend one of the three
alternative schools or a school with less enrollment pressure.
The three elementary schools without attendance areas are alternative schools, with programs
available to students from throughout the District. Also, special programs are provided at other
schools, primarily in the southern portion of the District, that have available enrollment capacity.
Enrollment in other than the attendance area’s school occurs primarily due to students
participating in a program available at another school; examples are Special Day Classes (SDC),
for students qualifying for small classes with especially trained staff, and language immersion
classes, such as the Mandarin classes at Meyerholz in which a bi-lingual teacher conducts much
of the day’s studies in Mandarin. Up to the present English Language Development (ELD)
programs have been located at De Vargas, Nimitz and Muir Schools, but beginning next year
there will be ELD programs in each school with the participating students receiving special
support during a part of the day.
In total, 3,325 CUSD students, 17% of total enrollment, attend schools other than the school of
their attendance area. Because the programs tend to be located in schools with available
capacity, the overall effect of these “intra-district transfers” is to shift enrollment toward the
southern portion of the District where the pressure of resident students compared to the
enrollment capacities of the schools is less. It should be understood that the large majority of
these students have transferred by choice, though most would probably prefer it if the program
were available in their local school.
The attendance boundary lines do not follow city boundaries. This means that many schools
have attendance boundaries that include both students residing in the City of Cupertino and
students residing in neighboring cities, such as Sunnyvale, Santa Clara and Saratoga (or
unincorporated area). And, as noted above, three elementary alternative schools have no
designated attendance area but draw students from throughout the District.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 11 June 2014
Eight of the CUSD elementary schools are located within the boundaries of the City of
Cupertino. Seven of these – Collins, Eaton, Garden Gate, Lincoln, Regnart, Sedgwick and
Stevens Creek - have attendance areas. Faria, the eighth, is one of the three District alternative
schools; it therefore does not have an attendance area.
4.2. Enrollment Projections
4.2.1. Housing Projections
The General Plan Alternatives
Cupertino Union is a rapidly growing school district, as was made clear in the last chapter.
Enrollment has increased every year during the last decade, increasing from 15,575 in the fall of
2001 to 19,058 in the fall of 2013. The growth has been primarily in the northern part of the City
of Cupertino and in the Sunnyvale portion of the District.
This increase of about 22% has been accommodated in the existing schools in the District and
has resulted in overcrowding in many of these schools. Most of the schools are accommodating
more students than their design capacity, primarily by adding modular classrooms. Some
educational support facilities - cafeteria/general purpose spaces, administrative offices, support
classrooms for music/art or for students with targeted needs, playground space and facilities, etc.
- are also below standard.
Enrollment from new housing, without additional enrollment capacity at some schools, would
exacerbate this situation. Enrollment from new homes at the proposed Project sites is projected
here separately from enrollment from existing homes. This is necessary since the purpose of this
EIR is to identify and address the impact of students from this new development, distinguishing
it from the needs and costs of housing students from existing homes. This section sets forth
enrollment projections and describes the analysis upon which they are based.
The analysis of enrollment from new homes begins with projections of new residential
development on Project sites in the District. The Cupertino Union School District boundaries
encompass all except a very small portion of the City of Cupertino, and smaller portions of the
cities of Sunnyvale, San Jose, Saratoga, a very small portion of Los Altos, and a small
unincorporated area. The City of Cupertino had just under 40% of the housing units in the
District at the time of the 2000 U.S. Census. The remaining 60% of the District’s housing units
were in the other cities.
There are no large vacant land areas available for development within the District’s boundaries
and only a limited number of smaller vacant parcels. The majority of new residential will occur
as redevelopment of existing commercial properties (such as the Vallco Shopping Center site) or,
to a lesser extent, redevelopment of existing residential properties.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 12 June 2014
The alternatives being evaluated in the EIR were presented to the City Council on April 1, 2014.
The number of housing units planned for each alternative are reiterated here in the last row of
Table 4-1. Alternative A does not anticipate major changes to residential zoning, so its impact
does not differ from the existing General Plan No-Project Alternative. The only increase to
allowed residential density would be in the south part of the City where, as explained later, there
is capacity expected to be available since enrollment is projected to decrease in that part of the
City.
Both the existing General Plan and Alternative A contain a development allocation of 1,895 new
housing units. (It should be understood that these counts are of the number of units allowed to
be permitted under the policies of each alternative; they do not include already constructed units
nor units permitted but not yet built.) Fifty of the units included in each of the two alternatives
are expected to be located within the Santa Clara Unified School District, leaving 1,845 units to
be served by CUSD, as shown in the middle row of the table. The CUSD numbers for
Alternatives B and C are also shown in the table.
Table 4-1
New Housing Units
Source: City of Cupertino
The sites would be developed over the time period of the General Plan (i.e., by 2040). The first
row in the table shows the number of units allowed in projects identified as likely to be
developed in the 2015 through 2023 time period. The identification of development in this time
frame allows for analysis of the development of the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation
(RHNA), the number of units required by California Department of Housing and Community
Development (HCD), augmented by a modest surplus to provide for flexibility in case some sites
develop for uses other than housing.
It should be recognized that the unit counts in the table assumes that each site would be
developed to the realistic capacity identified for HCD. This may not always be the case,
especially for the larger number of units that are anticipated in Alternatives B and C. The use of
these numbers, however, provides for the identification of the maximum potential impacts that
could occur under each alternative.
Alternatives
Existing
Conditions
Minimal
Growth
A
Moderate
Growth
B
Most
Growth
C
By 2023 1,140 1,140 1,060 1,993
Total Expected in CUSD 1,845 1,845 2,966 3,596
Total in City of Cupertino 1,895 1,895 3,316 4,421
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 13 June 2014
Enrollment Forecasts Prepared for CUSD
The Cupertino District contracts with Enrollment Projection Consultants (EPC) to prepare annual
enrollment projections. The firm’s projections are based on an extensive analysis of factors
affecting enrollment in the District. The analysis includes:
economic and social factors,
birth statistics,
patterns of grade-to-grade cohort progressions and,
particular to enrollment from new homes, development in the pipeline, zoning and
other development constraints and student generation per new home.
The analysis is detailed, in that it analyzes factors affecting enrollment in “planning areas”,
allowing for forecasts for each area based on the nature of that area.
EPC’s housing projections confirm the reasonableness of the anticipated timing of residential
projects within the timeframe of the Housing Element. EPC projects that 358 units, a little less
than 20% of the total anticipated in the first two alternatives, will be developed in the five years
2014 through 2018. (To make it comparable with the rezoning counts, EPC’s number for the
next five years does not include 188 permitted but unbuilt units; EPC’s total for the five years is
546 units.) This is a reasonable proportion, as most of the projects not developed have existing
improvements that are at least marginally feasible and thus are likely to be redeveloped only
gradually over time.
EPC further estimates that another 963 units will develop in the period 2019 through 2023, for a
total of 1,321 units built in Cupertino in the years 2014 through 2023.
The large majority of the 963 units EPC projects for the following five years are on sites
included in Alternatives B and C. These sites require General Plan amendments and/or zoning
changes. They include the Vallco site, the site with the largest number of potential units, which
is expected to be a financially attractive project should a change in land use designation and
zoning be approved by the City. EPC’s projected total of 1,321 units over a decade is about 25%
above the number of units allowed on the Alternative B sites expected to develop in essentially
the same time period. It is two-thirds of the units allowed on Alternative C sites similarly
identified by staff.
4.2.2. Enrollment from New Units
Student Generation Rates
Student generation rates (SGRs), the average number of students per home, are the second key
aspect of projecting enrollment from new homes. (If 40 students reside in 100 homes, the SGR
of these homes is 0.40.) Almost all of the sites will be intensively developed in order to justify
financially the redevelopment of the properties. The units will be relatively small and yet
expensive, units that will not be as attractive to young families as other types of housing.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 14 June 2014
The four large apartment projects, with a total of 828 rental units, constructed since 1995 in
CUSD have average SGRs of 0.25 for grades K-5 and 0.07 for grades 6-8, for a total of 0.32
elementary and middle students per home. The units have an SGR of 0.07 for high school,
making the total K-12 SGR 0.39 students per home. This total SGR is three to five times the
average elementary SGRs typically found in comparable units throughout the state. Some of the
four projects have rates lower than the average and some higher, but the most extreme variation
among the projects is only 15% from the average.
The average SGRs from these units are used in generating the forecasts below; thus they directly
project student generation during the first decade or so of occupancy of the units. More often
than not student generation increases over the first couple of decades in most projects, as
younger children enter their school years, then eventually gradually decreases as families age.
The SGRs typically used are the average SGRs of new developments during the first decade after
occupancy. Over time, the average student generation depends on many factors, including the
rate of turnover in occupancy and the types of families that move into the units.
Enrollment from New Units
The table below shows the CUSD enrollment projected from the development of the maximum
number of units that may be allowed for each site in each of the alternatives. Enrollment for the
elementary and middle school grades is shown separately so their separate impacts on schools
can be analyzed.
Table 4-2
Enrollment from New Units
Located in Cupertino Union School District
Sources: Enrollment Projection Consultants and City of Cupertino
SGRs
Existing
Conditions
Minimal
Growth
A
Moderate
Growth
B
Most
Growth
C
By 2023
grades K-5 0.25 285 285 265 498
grades 6-8 0.07 80 80 74 140
Total CUSD 365 365 339 638
From Total Units Allowed
grades K-5 0.25 461 461 742 899
grades 6-8 0.07 129 129 208 252
Total CUSD 590 590 949 1,151
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 15 June 2014
The District considers all of its schools in planning for adequate enrollment capacity; students
from a new housing development do not automatically attend the school of its attendance area.
Nevertheless, part of planning usage of the schools is awareness of in which attendance areas
students from new development will need to be accommodated. Table 4-3 therefore lists the
schools in Cupertino (plus Eisenhower which, though outside the City, could be a school
accommodating students from development of sites included in some of the alternatives). The
distribution of new housing among their attendance areas, along with the number of students
residing in that housing is shown.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 16 June 2014
Table 4-3
Enrollment by School Attendance Areas
From New Housing Units in the City of Cupertino
*The totals are not always exactly the numbers in the prior table due to rounding.
Sources: City of Cupertino and Schoolhouse Services
By 2023 Total
Units Enrollment Units Enrollment
Collins
Existing Conditions 37921053
A - Minimal Growth 37921053
B - Moderate Growth 637159751188
C - Most Growth 8372091,096274
Eaton
Existing Conditions 1684223459
A - Minimal Growth 1684223459
B - Moderate Growth 1684226065
C - Most Growth 1684226967
Garden Gate
Existing Conditions 762191964241
A - Minimal Growth 762191964241
B - Moderate Growth 93231,192298
C - Most Growth 7711931,332333
Lincoln
Existing Conditions 10310326
A - Minimal Growth 10310326
B - Moderate Growth 1013333
C - Most Growth 1015439
Regnart
Existing Conditions 1343417343
A - Minimal Growth 1343417343
B - Moderate Growth 1323326466
C - Most Growth 1874731980
Sedgwick
Existing Conditions 11314336
A - Minimal Growth 11314336
B - Moderate Growth 11318346
C - Most Growth 11318346
Stevens Creek
Existing Conditions 185185
A - Minimal Growth 185185
B - Moderate Growth 185185
C - Most Growth 185185
Eisenhower
Existing Conditions 0000
A - Minimal Growth 0000
B - Moderate Growth 0016541
C - Most Growth 0022556
District Total*
Existing Conditions 1,1402851,845461
A - Minimal Growth 1,1402851,845461
B - Moderate Growth 1,0602652,966742
C - Most Growth 1,9934983,596899
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 17 June 2014
The distribution among the middle school attendance areas is similarly shown in the table below.
All of the middle school attendance areas have some housing development except for Miller
Middle School; none of Miller’s attendance area is within the City of Cupertino.
Table 4-4
Enrollment from New Units by School Attendance Area
Cupertino Union School District Middle Schools
*The totals are not always exactly the numbers in the prior table due to rounding.
Sources: City of Cupertino and Schoolhouse Services
4.2.3. Enrollment from All Housing
The projection of future enrollment from existing housing stock in the District is also relevant.
Increased generation from existing homes would increase enrollment while reduced enrollment
resulting from families aging would free up space. The last several years have seen a great
increase in CUSD enrollment, especially in the younger grades. The share of the increase in
enrollment coming from existing homes has been far greater than the share due to students from
new homes.
By 2023 Total
Units Enrollment Units Enrollment
Cupertino
Existing Conditions 0025018
A - Minimal Growth 0025018
B - Moderate Growth 0040428
C - Most Growth 0053437
Hyde
Existing Conditions 11114310
A - Minimal Growth 11114310
B - Moderate Growth 11118313
C - Most Growth 11118313
Kennedy
Existing Conditions 2531838527
A - Minimal Growth 2531838527
B - Moderate Growth 2421750635
C - Most Growth 2972158241
Lawson
Existing Conditions 876611,06775
A - Minimal Growth 876611,06775
B - Moderate Growth 807561,873131
C - Most Growth 1,6851182,297161
District Total
Existing Conditions 1,140801,845129
A - Minimal Growth 1,140801,845129
B - Moderate Growth 1,060742,966208
C - Most Growth 1,9931403,596252
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 18 June 2014
Many factors have been influencing enrollment and will continue to do so. The larger role of test
scores in attracting increasing numbers of young families to the District over the last decade has
been a major factor in young families with children replacing older households, especially in
rental units. On the other hand, there are attendance areas, primarily in the southern portion of
the District, where enrollment from homes is decreasing as the children of some of the families
living in the single family homes built two or three decades ago (such as the Seven Springs
development)) have graduated and the households continue to occupy these units.
Employment in the area is a significant factor contributing to enrollment. It has increased
substantially in the last decade and is expecting to continue to increase, especially in the
technology industry. The Apple Campus2 complex will be part of this increase. A large
percentage of the employees are younger and therefore tend to prefer the more active lifestyle in
San Francisco to local suburban housing options. Apple’s robust transportation system that
serves employees living in San Francisco supports this conclusion.
Yet the preferences of these young employees are likely to change as they age, have families,
have less interest in San Francisco activities, and have an increased aversion to the time spent in
commuting. The quality of local schools will influence their choice of housing location. It is
also likely that the average income of these employees would be adequate to afford housing in
Cupertino. This would create demand by young families for housing in the Cupertino District.
However, there is no factual basis on which to quantify with accuracy the extent of change it
may bring to student generation.
Several other factors are also involved. The birth rate in the Cupertino area dipped significantly,
roughly 10-15%, during the recent recession (in the years 2009 through 2011), but has apparently
increased somewhat (2012 State data is not yet available). The dip will certainly be reflected in
kindergarten enrollments five years later, i.e., beginning in the fall of 2015, but the extent of the
reduction is difficult to predict. Additionally, there is also the uncertainty about the change in
the birth-date at which the State requires students begin kindergarten, complicated by the
possibility of the District having classes for students with birthdays just prior to the cut-off and
the current effort by Democratic legislators to add a year of what is currently pre-school to the
State public school responsibilities.
The table below shows EPC’s projections of enrollment from existing housing for the next five
years, fall 2014 through fall 2018; projections beyond that year would be projecting the
enrollment of children not yet born. The projections are based on trends already in evidence and
thus project a decline in enrollment from existing housing over the next five years. One reason is
the lower birth rates beginning about 2009 which have not yet fully recovered. This results in
declines in elementary enrollment for the next two years, after which it begins to stabilize.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 19 June 2014
The other principal reason is the aging of the young families that moved in during the last decade
attracted by the quality of the schools, a reputation reinforced by its high test scores. As these
families age, their children graduate to high school, decreasing enrollment until the family moves
from the community. In other words, an influx of young families in an elementary school district
tends to lead to a decline a decade later. EPC is aware of the potential for future increases in
young families as young employees mature, have families, and seek suburban housing closer to
their jobs and, especially, seek outstanding schools for their young children. However, EPC
doesn’t see this as a significant factor in the next five years.
Overall, elementary school enrollment from existing housing is reduced in the next couple of
years after which it moves relatively close to stability. In the long run enrollment will depend on
the rate of turnover and the nature of the families that replace those moving out of the District.
The enrollments in the table, lower than current enrollments, are used as the estimates of
enrollment in 2023 and thereafter from existing homes.
Table 4-5
Future Elementary Enrollment from Existing Housing Units*
Located in Attendance Areas in the City of Cupertino
* Includes enrollment from the Biltmore and Main Street projects,
which are already approved. Does not include about 120 CUSD
students who reside outside of the District.
Source: Enrollment Projection Consultants (EPC)
The passing of the peak enrollment from the recent influx of young families will offer some
relief to the District. However, much of the consideration of that relief depends on in what
attendance areas it will occur. If it is in the areas with the greatest enrollment pressure, it will
provide the greatest relief. The stress on school facilities depends both on enrollment from new
units and enrollment from units already existing in the District. The projected elementary
Change
2013-2018
2018
Enrollment
Collins -101 755
Eaton -41 733
Garden Gate -43 838
Lincoln -71 797
Regnart -65 507
Sedgwick +6 868
Stevens Creek -84 666
Sub-total -419 5,164
Remainder of District -545 6,457
District Total -964 11,621
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 20 June 2014
enrollments by school are therefore summed in the following table. They can then be compared
with capacity as analyzed in the next section.
Setting enrollment counts from new units next to total enrollments, including from existing units,
does make one conclusion clear. The large majority of enrollment under any alternative will
come from units already present in the District.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 21 June 2014
Table 4-6
Enrollment by School Attendance Areas
from New Units in the City of Cupertino and Existing Units
*Totals do not include enrollment from new units outside of the City of Cupertino nor about
120 students who do not reside in the District..
Sources: City of Cupertino, Enrollment Projection Consultants, and Schoolhouse Services
Enrollment By 2023 Enrollment Total
From New Total From New Total
Collins
Existing Conditions 976453808
A - Minimal Growth 976453808
B - Moderate Growth 159914188943
C - Most Growth 2099642741,029
Eaton
Existing Conditions 4279759814
A - Minimal Growth 4279759814
B - Moderate Growth 4279765820
C - Most Growth 4279767822
Garden Gate
Existing Conditions 1911,0292411,079
A - Minimal Growth 1911,0292411,079
B - Moderate Growth 238612981,136
C - Most Growth 1931,0313331,171
Lincoln
Existing Conditions 380026823
A - Minimal Growth 380026823
B - Moderate Growth 079733830
C - Most Growth 079739836
Regnart
Existing Conditions 3454143550
A - Minimal Growth 3454143550
B - Moderate Growth 3354066573
C - Most Growth 4755480587
Sedgwick
Existing Conditions 387136904
A - Minimal Growth 387136904
B - Moderate Growth 387146914
C - Most Growth 387146914
Stevens Creek
Existing Conditions 56715671
A - Minimal Growth 56715671
B - Moderate Growth 56715671
C - Most Growth 56715671
Eisenhower
Existing Conditions 06,45706,457
A - Minimal Growth 06,45706,457
B - Moderate Growth 06,457416,498
C - Most Growth 06,457566,513
District Total*
Existing Conditions 28511,89746112,073
A - Minimal Growth 28511,89746112,073
B - Moderate Growth 26511,87774212,354
C - Most Growth 49812,11089912,511
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 22 June 2014
We now turn to future enrollments in the middle schools. The projections by Enrollment
projections Consultants for future enrollment from existing housing are shown in Table 4-7.
Enrollment is projected to be about the same in five years as it is now. These fall 2018
enrollment numbers are used as an estimate of enrollment in 2023 and thereafter; a dip between
2018 and 2023 is projected, but enrollment is projected to be almost recovered by the latter year.
Table 4-7
Future Middle School Enrollment from Existing Housing Units*
by School Attendance Areas
*Includes enrollment from the Biltmore and Main Street projects,
which are already approved. Does not include about 50 students
who reside outside of the District.
Source: Enrollment Projection Consultants (EPC)
The distribution among the attendance areas for middle schools is similarly shown in the table
below. All of the middle school attendance areas have some housing development except for
Miller Middle School; none of Miller’s attendance area is within the City of Cupertino.
Change
2013-2018
2018
Enrollment
Cupertino +240 1,762
Hyde +228 1,242
Kennedy -325 1,215
Lawson +70 1,099
Miller -215 990
Total -2 6,308
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 23 June 2014
Table 4-8
Projected Middle School Enrollment by School Attendance Areas
New and Existing Housing Units in the City of Cupertino
*Totals do not include enrollment from new units outside of the City of Cupertino, nor
students who do not reside in the District, about 120 students.
Sources: City of Cupertino, Enrollment Projection Consultants, and Schoolhouse Services
4.3. Enrollment Capacities
4.3.1. District-wide Capacity
Enrollment capacity, of a school, a group of schools, or of the District as a whole, is dependent
on the number of classrooms available and the average number of students in them. The total
enrollment capacity of all of CUSD’s schools is calculated in Table 4-8 below.
By 2023 Total
From New Total* From New Total*
Cupertino
Existing Conditions 01,762181,780
A - Minimal Growth 01,762181,780
B - Moderate Growth 01,762281,790
C - Most Growth 01,762371,799
Hyde 00
Existing Conditions 11,243101,252
A - Minimal Growth 11,243101,252
B - Moderate Growth 11,243131,255
C - Most Growth 11,243131,255
Kennedy 00
Existing Conditions 181,233271,242
A - Minimal Growth 181,233271,242
B - Moderate Growth 171,232351,250
C - Most Growth 211,236411,256
Lawson 00
Existing Conditions 611,160751,174
A - Minimal Growth 611,160751,174
B - Moderate Growth 561,1551311,230
C - Most Growth 1181,2171611,260
00
District Total* 00
Existing Conditions 806,3881296,437
A - Minimal Growth 806,3881296,437
B - Moderate Growth 746,3822086,516
C - Most Growth 1406,4482526,560
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 24 June 2014
Table 4-8
Classroom Count and Enrollment Capacity
Elementary Middle Total
CLASSROOMS
Permanent 408 205 613
Modular1 129 41 170
Total Classrooms 537 246 783
Support (3/4 rooms per school)2 60 20 80
Available Classrooms 477 226 703
Non-SDC 443 210 653
SDC classrooms 34 16 50
CAPACITY
Non-SDC classrooms capacity3 11,607 5,250 16,857
SDC Classrooms Capacity4 408 192 600
Theoretical Capacity 12,015 5,442 17,457
Efficiency 95% 90%
Practical Capacity 11,414 4,898 16,312
Capacity per Available Room 23.9 21.7
1 Excluding 60 aging classrooms
2 Three academic support rooms at each elementary school and four at each middle school.
3 Reflecting loading of grades K-3 at 24 students per room, grades 4 and 5
at 32 students per room, and middle school grades 6-8 at 25 students per room
4 SDC classroom loading at 12 students per room
Sources: Cupertino Union School District and Schoolhouse Services
The calculations begin with the total number of District permanent and modular classrooms for
the elementary and middle grade levels. While the District has periodically replaced older
modulars and renovated older permanent classrooms, there are additional classrooms already
showing their age that should be replaced or renovated in the coming decade; otherwise they will
not be up-to-standard in the coming years. Of the modular classrooms 57 elementary and three
middle school classrooms are currently more than 20 years old, about a quarter of the total
number of modular classrooms. Without any data about the condition of each classroom, the
count of modulars more than 20 years old is taken as a proxy for those modular and permanent
classrooms that will have to be replaced or substantially renovated before too long. These 60
such rooms constitute about seven percent of the total number of classrooms. It can also be
noted that modulars as a whole constitute 27% of District classrooms, moderately above the 20%
standard in the State funding program. The number of modular classrooms shown thus does not
include 60 classrooms. The District has 783 classrooms to be counted on for determining future
enrollment capacity.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 25 June 2014
The District’s standard is to have one room at each elementary school for its Resource
Specialists Program (RSP) and two others for other academic support uses, including music and
art rooms, computer and language labs, etc. The similar standard at middle schools, which are
larger, is to have four academic support rooms. The table thus shows an allocation of 80 rooms
for this purpose, leaving 703 classrooms available as “home rooms” District-wide.
The rooms are then allocated between SDC classes, which have lower class sizes, and non-SDC
classes. The SDC rooms are loaded at 12 students per room, approximately the State standard.
The District’s loading standards for non-SDC classes, as described in its 2014 fee justification
document, are 24 students for K-3 classes and 32 students for grades four and five, which results
in an average of 26.2 students per non-SDC class. The standard for middle schools is 25
students per class, which is the actual ratio of students to full time equivalent (FTE) teaching
positions at each school.
The count of classrooms in each category multiplied by the loading standards for that category
indicates a gross theoretical capacity for 17,457 students. The District’s standards for efficiency
in the use of the theoretical capacity are 95% for elementary schools and 90% for middle
schools. The elementary school standard is fairly aggressive, as the District has a goal of not
having any combination classes (e.g. a mix of second and third graders) and currently perhaps
only about half of the schools have even one such class.
As indicated in the table, the total District capacity is 16,312 students - 11,414 elementary and
4,898 middle school students. The table also shows the ratio between enrollment capacity and
the number of available classrooms (not including support rooms), the average number of
students per available classroom for that grade level.
4.3.2. Enrollment Capacities of Schools in the City of Cupertino
Eight of the District’s elementary schools are located in the City of Cupertino, though it must be
emphasized that they enroll many students who reside outside of the City and many students
living in the City attend other schools located outside of the City. These are the schools most
directly affected by development in the City.
Table 4-9 shows information about the enrollment capacity of these schools. Enrollment
capacity, the last column, is estimated as the number of classrooms available times the ratio
between available classrooms and enrollment capacity in the last line of Table 4-8 above.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 26 June 2014
Table 4-9
Elementary Schools Located in the City of Cupertino
*Enrollment capacity is equal to the number of classrooms time 23.9 students per room,
the average shown in Table 4-8 above.
Sources: Cupertino Union School District and Schoolhouse Services
Similar information about middle schools is provided in Table 4-10. Four of the District’s
middle schools are located within the City’s limits; Miller Middle School is located outside of
the City.
Table 4-10
Middle Schools Located in the City of Cupertino
*Enrollment capacity is equal to the number of classrooms available times the average
number of students, 21.7 students per classroom as shown in Table 4-8 above.
Sources: Cupertino Union School District and Schoolhouse Services
Total
Classrooms
Portables >
20 years old
Support
Rooms
Classrooms
Available
Enrollment
Capacity*
Collins 28 0 3 25 598
Eaton 28 0 3 25 598
Faria 27 0 3 24 574
Garden Gate 32 4 3 25 598
Lincoln 31 9 3 19 455
Regnart 27 7 3 17 407
Sedgwick 31 9 3 19 455
Stevens Creek 29 2 3 24 574
Sub-total 233 31 24 178 4,259
Remainder of
District 361 26 36 299 7,155
District Total 594 57 60 477 11,414
Total
Classrooms
Portables >
20 years old
Support
Rooms
Classrooms
Available
Enrollment
Capacity*
Cupertino 61 0 4 57 1,235
Hyde 35 0 4 31 672
Kennedy 49 1 4 44 954
Lawson 55 0 4 51 1,105
Sub-total 200 1 16 183 3,966
Remainder of
District 49 2 4 43 932
District Total 249 3 20 226 4,898
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 27 June 2014
4.4. Enrollment Compared to Capacities
4.4.1. Elementary Schools
Current Situation
The two previous sections have provided information about Cupertino Union School District
enrollment projections and the enrollment capacities of its schools. This section compares the
two to provide information about the extent of stress on District schools.
Table 4-11
Current Enrollment Compared to Capacity
Elementary Schools
* Attending enrollment is fall 2013 CALPADS enrollment.
** Resident enrollment is total District enrollment residing in the school’s attendance area.
*** Attending exceeds resident enrollment due to children of teachers and other staff attending.
Source: Enrollment Projection Consultants
The Attending Difference column of the table shows that attendance at each of the elementary
schools shown except Eaton exceeds the capacity established in Table 4-8 based on the District’s
standards. For the District as a whole, enrollment exceeds capacity by about 1,300 students.
Students are accommodated by current use of classrooms, primarily portables, near the end of
their useful lives, which add capacity for about the same number of students. It can also be noted
that the more stressed schools lack flexibility.
The situation would be much worse for the schools in Cupertino except for the availability of
three schools which do not have designated attendance areas but, as described earlier, provide
programs for students from throughout the District. Faria is one such school, the only one
located in the City of Cupertino. Similarly, some of the schools in the southern portion of the
District, primarily outside of Cupertino City limits, have excess enrollment capacity and
programs in these schools enroll students from the central and northern portions of the District.
Capacity
Attending
Enrollment*
Attending
Difference
Resident
Enrollment**
Resident
Difference
Collins 598 720 122 856 258
Eaton 598 590 -8 774 176
Faria 574 678 104 0 -574
Garden Gate 598 739 141 881 283
Lincoln 455 705 250 868 413
Regnart 407 510 103 572 165
Sedgwick 455 565 110 862 407
Stevens Creek 574 599 25 750 176
Sub-total 4,259 5,106 847 5,563 1,304
Rest of District 7,155 7,594 439 7,022 -133
District Total*** 11,414 12,700 1,286 12,585 1,171
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 28 June 2014
The Resident Difference column shows the gap between the enrollment capacity of each school
and the number of students residing in its attendance area. The negative number for Faria
reflects the fact that it has no attendance area and thus its capacity is available for special
programs that accommodate students from designated attendance areas. The 12 schools located
outside of the City of Cupertino together have a calculated capacity slightly in excess of the
number of students residing in their attendance areas, while the eight schools located in the City
have together about 1,300 more students residing in their attendance areas than they have
enrollment capacity.
Incidentally, it can be seen that the enrollment/capacity difference is 115 students greater for
Attending than for Resident. The extra students are from the families of District teachers and
other staff. Essentially all California districts, including CUSD, allow such students to attend its
schools. (It is not known how many students who reside in Cupertino attend other than District
schools, either schools in other public districts or private schools.)
Situation in the Future
The above table provides a picture of the current situation in the District’s schools. The picture
in the future with changing enrollments from existing housing and alternative amounts of new
units being considered is much more relevant, particularly since the purpose of the EIR is to
analyze the impacts of the alternatives. The following table, Table 4-12, thus shows the
capacities calculated in Table 4-9 and compares them with the projected enrollment for each
Cupertino school from both new units and total units, existing and new.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 29 June 2014
Table 4-12
Enrollment Capacity Compared to Enrollment by School Attendance Areas
from New Units in the City of Cupertino and Existing Units
* Totals do not include enrollment from new units outside of the City of Cupertino, about 62 students.
Sources: City of Cupertino, Enrollment Projection Consultants, and Schoolhouse Services
Enrollment Enrollment By 2023 Enrollment Total
Capacity From New Total From New Total
Collins
Existing Conditions 598 9 764 53 808
A - Minimal Growth 9 764 53 808
B - Moderate Growth 159 914188 943
C - Most Growth 209 964274 1,029
Eaton
Existing Conditions 598 42 797 59 814
A - Minimal Growth 42 797 59 814
B - Moderate Growth 42 797 65 820
C - Most Growth 42 797 67 822
Garden Gate
Existing Conditions 598 1911,029 241 1,079
A - Minimal Growth 1911,029 241 1,079
B - Moderate Growth 23 861298 1,136
C - Most Growth 193 1,031 333 1,171
Lincoln
Existing Conditions 455 3 800 26 823
A - Minimal Growth 3 800 26 823
B - Moderate Growth 0 797 33 830
C - Most Growth 0 797 39 836
Regnart
Existing Conditions 407 34 54143 550
A - Minimal Growth 34 54143 550
B - Moderate Growth 33 540 66 573
C - Most Growth 47 554 80 587
Sedgwick
Existing Conditions 455 3 871 36 904
A - Minimal Growth 3 871 36 904
B - Moderate Growth 3 87146 914
C - Most Growth 3 87146 914
Stevens Creek
Existing Conditions 574 5 671 5 671
A - Minimal Growth 5 671 5 671
B - Moderate Growth 5 671 5 671
C - Most Growth 5 671 5 671
Remainder of District
Existing Conditions 7,155 0 6,457 0 6,457
A - Minimal Growth 0 6,457 0 6,457
B - Moderate Growth 0 6,457 41 6,498
C - Most Growth 0 6,457 56 6,513
District Total*
Existing Conditions 14,414285 11,897 461 12,073
A - Minimal Growth 285 11,897 461 12,073
B - Moderate Growth 265 11,877 742 12,354
C - Most Growth 498 12,110 899 12,511
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 30 June 2014
The table emphasizes the large gap between the capacities calculated based on the educational
facility standards the District considers appropriate and projected enrollment needs. It makes
clear again in this context that the future enrollment from the new development alternatives is
not the primary cause of the problem, but that it tends to impact certain already stressed schools.
Stressed Schools
District staff considers five of the elementary schools as particularly stressed by enrollment
pressures and 10 others as under moderate stress at the current time. (Another school,
Meyerholz, is also stressed, but it is not included in the most stressed group since its pressure is
due not to the number of students residing in its attendance area, but due to the students attracted
by the Mandarin Chinese immersion program at the school.) The District’s schools are listed
below by degree of stress, though it should be understood that this is just a convenience to help
focus attention rather than a result of a careful analysis.
Most Stressed Moderately Stressed Not Currently Stressed
Collins
Eisenhower
Nimitz
Sedgwick
Stocklmeir
De Vargas
Dilworth
Eaton
Garden Gate
Stevens Creek
West Valley
Lincoln
Blue Hills
Meyerholz
John Muir
Regnart
These three groups occupy three different locational strata on the District. The schools in the
first group have contiguous attendance areas in the northeast portion of the District. The four
least stressed schools are grouped together in the southernmost portion of the District. The
attendance areas of the remaining schools are located in the middle of the District. The fact that
the stressed schools are grouped together, and that the adjacent attendance areas are all
moderately stressed, makes it difficult to mitigate the stress.
Table 4-12, which compares enrollment capacities with projected enrollments, provides some
evidence why the schools in the northeast are the most stressed. Collins and Sedgwick are the
only most stressed schools located in the City and their projected enrollment far exceeds their
capacity. Garden Gate, in particular, and Eaton are two other schools in Cupertino likely to be
pushed into the most stressed category by enrollment from new development. These schools are
adjacent to three of the currently most stressed schools.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 31 June 2014
4.4.2. Middle Schools
Current Situation
This section provides similar information on the middle schools. Information regarding the
comparison of current enrollment with capacity for the middle schools is shown in Table 4-13
below.
Table 4-13
Middle Schools Located in the City of Cupertino
*Attending enrollment is fall 2013 CALPADS enrollment.
**Resident enrollment is total District enrollment of all students residing in the attendance area.
***Attending exceeds resident enrollment due to children of teachers and other staff attending.
Source: Enrollment Projection Consultants
As with the elementary schools, it can be seen that enrollment significantly exceeds the District’s
capacity. The largest differences occur in two schools, Kennedy and Hyde Middle Schools (and
in Miller, which constitutes most of the “Rest of District”). Lawson Middle School actually has
capacity exceeding its enrollment, due to the new classroom building just been completed there.
Cupertino Middle Schools also has a new classroom building, but a significant capacity deficit
still remains.
Capacity
Attending
Enrollment
Attending
Difference
Resident
Enrollment
Resident
Difference
Cupertino 1,235 1,352 117 1,522 287
Hyde 672 1,039 367 1,014 342
Kennedy 954 1,452 498 1,540 586
Lawson 1,105 1,130 25 1,028 -77
Sub-total 3,966 4,973 1,007 5,104 1,138
Rest of District 932 1,385 453 1,205 273
District Total 4,898 6,358 1,460 6,309 1,411
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 32 June 2014
Situation in the Future
It is again more relevant to look at the situation showing the capacities compared with future
enrollment for each of the alternatives.
Table 4-14
Enrollment Capacity Compared to Enrollment by School Attendance Areas
from New Units in the City of Cupertino and Existing Units
*Totals do not include enrollment from new units outside of the City of Cupertino, about 62 students, and
students who do not resided in the District, about 120 students.
Sources: City of Cupertino, Enrollment Projection Consultants, and Schoolhouse Services
Lawson is the school potentially most impacted by the enrollment from the new development
alternatives. District staff considers Cupertino the most stressed school. It has by far the largest
enrollment and the largest capacity deficit, though the potential enrollment impact is projected to
be modest. The pressure from total enrollment from the current housing stock is the main
Enrollment Enrollment By 2023 Enrollment Total
Capacity From New Total From New Total
Cupertino
Existing Conditions 1,235 0 1,762 18 1,780
A - Minimal Growth 0 1,762 18 1,780
B – Moderate Growth 0 1,762 28 1,790
C - Most Growth 0 1,762 37 1,799
Hyde
Existing Conditions 672 1 1,243 10 1,252
A - Minimal Growth 1 1,243 10 1,252
B - Moderate Growth 1 1,243 13 1,255
C - Most Growth 1 1,243 13 1,255
Kennedy
Existing Conditions 954 18 1,233 27 1,242
A - Minimal Growth 18 1,233 27 1,242
B - Moderate Growth 17 1,232 35 1,250
C - Most Growth 21 1,236 41 1,256
Lawson
Existing Conditions 1,105 61 1,160 75 1,174
A - Minimal Growth 61 1,160 75 1,174
B - Moderate Growth 56 1,155 131 1,230
C - Most Growth 118 1,217 161 1,260
District Total
Existing Conditions 4,898 80 6,388 129 6,437
A - Minimal Growth 80 6,388 129 6,437
B - Moderate Growth 74 6,382 208 6,516
C - Most Growth 140 6,448 252 6,560
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 33 June 2014
challenge, with Cupertino, Hyde and Kennedy Middle Schools all with capacity significantly
below enrollment from their attendance areas.
4.4.3. Facility Improvement Plans
Elementary Capacity
The district’s preferred option for housing the increased elementary enrollment would be a new
school in the northern portion of the district. Most of the schools are already above the 500-600
student sizes that would be optimal for elementary schools. However, there seems to be no
possibility of a new school. The primary reasons are the lack of a suitable site and, if one were
available, its astronomical cost.
The likelihood is therefore that the increased enrollment will be housed by construction of one or
more classroom wings at one or more over-crowded schools. Doing so involves the matter of
whether the schools have adequate support facilities for the larger enrollments. The District has
worked to improve the support facilities to accompany the classrooms it has added, and adding
more classrooms needs to be accompanied by continued efforts to enable campuses to function
with a significantly larger enrollment than the design of the campus anticipated. The schools
were generally built with design capacities of between 500 and 600 students; Eisenhower,
Collins and Nimitz all have enrollments above 700 and Stocklmeir, by far the largest school, has
over 1,200 students enrolled and 1,600 students residing in its attendance area.
Consideration as to where capacity could be added at schools in the northern tier of the District
needs to reflect not only the need in each attendance area, but also the current sizes of the
schools and the potential for additional development on each campus. It will be a challenge to
add additional classrooms, especially on the campuses of schools in the northeastern portion of
the District where the enrollment pressures are most intense; a large number of classrooms have
already been added, taking up the available space. The relationship between current enrollments,
the space standards for these enrollments, and the actual size of the campuses are shown for the
five elementary schools in the category of most stressed are shown in the table below. Four of
the schools have enrollments well above their original design capacity, with Stocklmeir far
above. Only Sedgwick has an enrollment of preferred size.
The School Facilities Planning Division of the California Department of Education has published
a “Guide to School Site Analysis and Development” which includes recommendations for size of
campus for various enrollments. For a very large school the size of Stocklmeir, the guide would
appear to recommend about 19.3 acres, though the figure has to be an extrapolation as the guide
does not recognize elementary schools of this size. For a large school of about 700-750 students,
the size of Collins, Eisenhower and Nimitz, the guide recommends 13.7 acres and for a 565
student school, 9.8 acres.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 34 June 2014
Table 4-15
Campus Sizes Compared to State Standards
*Attending enrollment is fall 2013 CALPADS enrollment.
Sources: Cupertino Union School District, and California Dept. of Education
Accommodating students on a campus smaller than standard involves placing classrooms on
areas the state guide plans for other uses, such as recreation (more than seven acres
recommended for a school of 750 students). The District’s planning assumes that classroom
wings would have two stories to minimize the ground area required and that the enlargement of
support facilities would also be designed to minimize the compromise with recreational space.
One approach is to replace existing modulars, especially if they are deficient in any way, with
two-story classroom wings of permanent construction.
The options for adding capacity can be grouped into three categories – new buildings on existing
campuses, new buildings on newly purchased land, and “repurposing” of existing properties, in
other words, converting property now used for another purpose into classrooms.
Building two-story classroom buildings on existing campus has been pointed out above as the
most likely option for adding enrollment capacity. Garden Gate, Collins, and Eisenhower are all
campuses that could benefit significantly from additional capacity; the first two have the largest
potential impact from the new development alternatives. No plans have been prepared.
However, it appears that any of the three campuses could accommodate a two-story classroom
wing, the land area for which would be to some extent made available by removal of some
modular classrooms. This is the option used to calculate the cost of additional capacity in the
fiscal section below.
It was also pointed out above that the availability of a site that would meet State size and other
requirements for a school would be very difficult to find and, if one could be found, its cost
would be prohibitive. CUSD does appear to have an opportunity that is also seldom available to
add a parcel of land to an existing campus. The owner of a site adjacent to Sedgwick School has
offered to sell the site to the District. Added to the campus it could be developed with additional
classrooms. The site is currently be evaluated as to whether it can meet State requirements for
school use.
Enrollment* Standard Actual Size
Collins 720 13.7 acres 11.8 acres
Eisenhower 713 13.7 acres 9.8 acres
Nimitz 716 13.7 acres 9.2 acres
Sedgwick 565 9.8 acres 8.8 acres
Stocklmeir 1,236 19.3 acres 14.3 acres
Total 3,950 70.2 53.9
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 35 June 2014
The expected cost would be $5.7 million. The cost estimates in the fiscal section assume
construction on campuses as they currently exist, so no land cost is included. The land cost for
this site would probably make it a more expensive option. On the other hand, it would cause
minimal disruption on the campus, no need for interim housing, etc., which would probably
lower the construction cost somewhat, and opportunities to add useful land seldom occur.
Finally, another option to add enrollment capacity would be for the District to identify an activity
now located on a campus that does not require such a location and to relocate it to another site,
freeing up the space or land area allowing it to be “repurposed” for additional enrollment
capacity. This could occur, in theory at least, with the relocation of a function such as the
District kitchen or even the relocation of a current educational program that does not require a
campus setting.
The option of “repurposing” the use of land that would have the greatest impact would be the
termination of leases on one or both of the two closed schools owned by the District. The
buildings would not meet current requirements; they would have to be demolished and a new
school built. Lease revenue from each of the schools is about $600,000 per year; this income
flows into the District’s general fund. Terminating the leases and foregoing the income would,
in essence, be the “purchase price” of the site, adding significantly to the cost. The community
would also be losing the site for the activities currently using the site. Neither school is in a good
location to have an attendance area; they might have to function as schools with programs that
attract students from other parts of the District.
The District is continually looking for and examining options to add capacity and implementing
those that best meet the District’s needs. That process has included frequent re-evaluations of
options involving the two closed schools. All of the options involve costs far greater than the
associated impact fee revenue. Supplemental mitigation would most likely be in the form of
funding of a portion of the cost of a project. Other alternatives include contributions to cover
revenue forgone for a period or contributions of land or building space.
Middle School Capacity
The most important priority of the recent bond issue was the addition of capacity at the middle
school level, space needed to accommodate the large classes now in the third to fifth grades of
the elementary schools. District staff is just now focusing on future options to meet enrollment
capacity needs.
All of the options described above for elementary school capacity could also be used for middle
school capacity. Nevertheless, District staff expects that the most likely option to add the most
future enrollment capacity will, as with the elementary capacity, be added at the existing
campuses. And presumably it would be, to the greatest extent possible, added in the form of
two-story buildings.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 36 June 2014
4.5. Fiscal Impacts
4.5.1. Facilities Costs
School Costs
The District’s preferred option for meeting enrollment capacity needs would be, as discussed
above, new schools in the northern portion of the district where students resident in the
attendance area exceed the capacity of the schools and enrollment is still increasing. However,
there seems to be no possibility of a new school. The primary reasons are the lack of a suitable
site and, if one were available, its extremely high cost. The assumption made here is therefore
that the increased enrollment will be housed by construction of new classroom wings at one or
more otherwise over-crowded schools, along with improvements in the support facilities to allow
the campus to function with a significantly larger enrollment than the design of the campus
anticipated.
Since the projects funded by the bond issue are now under construction, the District has current
data on its cost of construction in the building of additional classrooms. Two classroom
buildings being constructed at Cupertino Middle School are the best example. They have a total
of 22 classrooms and have 26,700 square feet of floor space. The building with 20 of the
classrooms is two stories, which is necessary to minimize the footprint of the building and
reserve as much of the site as possible for recreation space.
The building was prefabricated off-site, making it less expensive than built on-site construction,
though more expensive than individual modular classrooms. The cost is $10.9 million, which is
$495,000 per classroom and $408 per square foot.
The California School Facility (CSF) program, which provides construction grants to qualifying
districts, uses a standard of 73 square feet per elementary school student. This size standard
includes space for academic support activities, such as libraries, assembly space, (usually general
purpose in elementary schools), administrative offices, cafeteria kitchen space, etc. The CSF
space standards are considered minimal; for example, the California Department of Education, in
the report referred to in the section on standards, evaluates them as seriously inadequate. Using
this standard, however, the cost is $29,780 per additional elementary school student. The CSF
standard for middle school floor space is 80 square feet per student. The cost per additional
middle school student is thus $32,640.
Table 4-16 below summarizes the estimated facilities costs in General Plan Alternatives A-C
based on the estimated increase in the number of students. (All of the impacts are expressed in
constant dollars.)
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 37 June 2014
Table 4-16
Per Student and per Alternative Capital Costs of Additional Capacity - CUSD
Students
by 2023
Costs
(in millions)
Total
Students
Costs
(in millions)
Elementary School
Existing Conditions 285 $8.49 461 $13.73
A - Minimal Growth 285 $8.49 461 $13.73
B - Moderate Growth 265 $7.89 742 $22.10
C - Most Growth 498 $14.83 899 $26.77
Middle School
Existing Conditions 80 $2.61 129 $4.21
A - Minimal Growth 80 $2.61 129 $4.21
B - Moderate Growth 74 $2.42 208 $6.79
C - Most Growth 140 $4.57 252 $8.23
CUSD Total
Existing Conditions 365 $11.10 590 $17.94
A - Minimal Growth 365 $11.10 590 $17.94
B - Moderate Growth 339 $10.31 950 $28.89
C - Most Growth 638 $19.40 1,151 $35.00
Source: Schoolhouse Services
4.5.2. Development Impact Fee Revenues
Square Feet of Development
The impact fee revenue, the source of school capital improvements funding provided by new
development, depends on the square footage of the project, and the square footage of buildings
existing on the sites prior to redevelopment as well. As was noted earlier, it is assumed that most
of the new units constructed will be fairly small apartments and condominiums. Based on the
average size of recent such units, the average gross square feet of the units would be about 1,100
square feet. (The gross square footage includes an estimated 140 square feet per unit for lobby,
administration, hallways, storage, etc.)
California court decisions have made it clear that school districts must credit against the fees on
new development an amount equal to the impact on schools of buildings demolished as part of
the project. It is the usual practice of essentially all California districts, including CUSD,
FUHSD and SCUSD, to give a credit on the new construction equal to the fees that would be
paid on the existing buildings if they were to be constructed new. This practice reflects the fact
that the demolished buildings will no longer be contributing to the need for school facilities.
The situation is further complicated by the fact that the fee credit for non-residential buildings is
only one-sixth that of residential buildings. The large majority of the demolished buildings will
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 38 June 2014
be non-residential. Our analysis indicates that the fee credits will amount to about 7.5% of the
gross fees on the new buildings.
Impact Fee Revenues
CUSD is eligible to levy Level 1 development impact fees on new residential development.
California law sets forth the maximum fee amount, currently $3.36 per square foot of
development. By agreement, CUSD is entitled to 60% of this amount, or $2.02 per square foot.
FUHSD receives the remainder, or $1.34 per square foot. The California State Allocation Board
adjusts the development fee amounts biennially for inflation; all of the cost analyses in this
report are in constant dollars, and thus in constant dollars the fee will remain the same. Impact
fees are one-time revenues collected at the time a building permit is issued. District building
costs are also one-time expenditures, since they are incurred at the time the school facilities are
constructed.
The fee at $2.02 per square foot on an average of 1,100 square feet per unit generates a gross fee
of $2,222 per unit. After deducting 7.5% for the credit on demolished buildings, the fee revenue
is $2,055 per unit. The resulting fee revenue for is shown in the table below.
Table 4-17
Development Impact Fee Revenue - CUSD
Units
by 2023
Fee Revenue
(in millions)
Total
Units
Fee Revenue
(in millions)
Existing Conditions 1,140 $2.34 1,845 $3.79
A ‐ Minimal Growth 1,140 $2.34 1,845 $3.79
B ‐ Moderate Growth 1,060 $2.18 2,966 $6.10
C - Most Growth 1,993 $4.10 3,596 $7.39
Source: Schoolhouse Services
Comparison of Capital Facilities Costs and Development Impact Fee Revenue
Table 4-18 shows the calculation of the difference between the costs incurred and the
development impact fees likely to be generated by the development allowed under each
alternative. Revenue from development fees covers less than a quarter of the cost of facilities to
accommodate the enrollment generated. Part of this gap exists because fee amounts were
originally intended to cover about half the cost; even then they usually do not fulfill that
intention. The remainder is primarily due to the fact that building retrofit facilities to add
capacity to existing campuses is usually much more expensive than the cost for the construction
of new campuses on vacant land. Additionally, the cost of construction of two story buildings is
substantially higher than single story structures.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 39 June 2014
Table 4-18
Development Impact Fee Revenue Versus Facilities Costs (in $ millions) - CUSD*
Units by 2023 Total Units
Cost Revenue Deficit Cost Revenue Deficit
Existing Conditions $11.10 $2.34 $8.76 $17.94 $3.79 $14.15
A - Minimal Growth $11.10 $2.34 $8.76 $17.94 $3.79 $14.15
B - Moderate Growth $10.31 $2.18 $8.13 $28.89 $6.10 $22.79
C - Most Growth $19.40 $4.10 $15.31 $35.00 $7.39 $27.61
* Both fee revenue and facilities costs are one-time, rather than annual, estimates.
Source: Schoolhouse Services
4.5.3. Operating Costs
Operating costs are annual costs and are matched with revenues received annually. Almost all
operating costs tend to increase with enrollment if educational standards are to be maintained.
These costs include personnel costs like salaries and benefits for certificated and classified
employees, which comprise a large majority of a district’s budget. Therefore, the cost per
student estimate is simply a calculation of the operating expenditures divided by the number of
students, as shown in Table 4-19.
Table 4-19
Operating Costs - CUSD
Sources: CUSD 2013-14 budget and Schoolhouse Services
The majority of District operating expenditures are for costs related to classrooms and thus
increase almost in direct proportion to enrollment; most other expenditures are also likely to
increase, at least to some extent, as enrollment increases. Thus, the marginal operating cost to
serve additional students is close to the overall operating cost per student.
4.5.4. Operating Revenues
New residential development will affect the revenues and costs for the three districts in very
different ways. Like most California school Districts, CUSD is a “revenue limit” district. Like
other revenue limited districts in the state, its property tax revenues are not sufficient to reach the
per student amounts guaranteed under the State of California school funding program.
Therefore, the state supplies the additional funds necessary to fill the gap up to the guaranteed
entitlement level. The result is that the total revenues from property taxes plus the revenue limit
program increase proportionately as enrollment increases. In revenue limit districts when there
is an increase in property tax revenue there is a comparable reduction in the money state funding;
Operating Budget $155.6 million
Enrollment 19,053
Operating Cost per Student $8,167
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 40 June 2014
thus higher, or lower, property taxes do not affect the total school operating funding CUSD
receives.
From one perspective, the projection of revenues to which CUSD is entitled is in transition to a
simpler funding process, as multiple separate funding programs are being discontinued and
replaced with a more comprehensive entitlement. This will provide more spending flexibility to
school districts. However, the determination of the entitlement amount is becoming much more
complex. An amount is calculated as a floor based on differing floor amounts per student at the
K-3, 4-6, 7-8 and 9-12 grade levels. There are “targeted” additions to this floor amount if all K-3
students classes average 24 students per class or less and for the number of students in certain
categories. (These categories are English Language Deficient (ELD) students, students
qualifying for reduced price lunches, and foster children students.) The targeted additions are
only partially funded (for the next few years, at least); they will be funded to an extent specified
a year in advance based on the estimated State budget.
CUSD’s entitlement for the 2014-15 year is $122 million, about $6,400 per student. The State
will supplement local property taxes with funding sufficient to bring the revenue up to this
amount.
All sources other than the state guaranteed entitlement totals about $1,800 per student for the
current fiscal year. The State government (in addition to entitlement funding) and the Federal
government provide funding for a number of programs. These revenues are also likely to
increase proportionately with enrollment. Local revenues to CUSD (other than the property
taxes) come from many sources. These include the Cupertino Educational Foundation, property
rentals, the State lottery, parcel taxes, etc. (Two separate parcel taxes currently provide
$875,000 per year, about one half of one percent of the budget; however, they will be expiring in
the next few years unless again approved by the voters.)
Revenues from many of these sources will increase with enrollment; others will not. In sum,
total CUSD revenues are likely to increase almost, but not quite, proportionately with additional
enrollment.
In summary, annual operating costs and operating income are both likely to increase almost
proportionate to enrollment. Thus the fiscal impact of the General Plan alternatives, exclusive of
capital facilities costs, is likely not to be significant.
4.5.5. Additional Financial Consideration
Two voter approved bond measures, one in 2001 and the other in 2012, have provided funding
for campus improvements. Debt service on the bond issues is spread among property tax payers
proportional to assessed value. New development, if it occurs prior to repayment of the
outstanding balance, will contribute to debt service on the bonds. Each new unit would pay
about $350 in annual debt service. The construction of all the units allowed in the projects in
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 41 June 2014
each alternative would generate the annual tax payments for debt service of between $700,000
and $1.3 million.
It should be understood, however, that these revenues do not directly increase the funds available
to CUSD. The bond issues and associated debt service are fixed amounts collected and paid to
the bond holders by the Santa Clara County. The assessed value of new development increases
the total assessed value in the District, spreading the debt service among a larger tax base and
resulting in it getting paid off sooner. And on any future bond measures, the additional assessed
value would increase the revenue generated for any given tax rate.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 42 June 2014
5. FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT (FUHSD)
5.1. Current Conditions
The Fremont Union High School District (FUHSD) operates five comprehensive high schools;
their attendance boundary lines do not follow city boundaries. The Cupertino Union and
Sunnyvale school districts provide almost all of its students. Except for the portion of the City of
Cupertino above Route 280, Cupertino High School (to the north) and Lynbrook High School (to
the south) attendance areas cover all of the east side of the City of Cupertino and communities
beyond. Monta Vista High School similarly covers the west side of the City and beyond. The
attendance areas of these three schools thus cover almost all of the City of Cupertino and the
large majority, though not the northern tier, of the Cupertino District. The portion of the City
north of Route 280 and the northern tier of CUSD attendance areas are served by Fremont High
School on the east and Homestead High School on the west; the two schools together cover
almost all of the City of Sunnyvale. In contrast to CUSD, almost all FUHSD students attend the
school of the attendance area in which they reside. And students residing in Cupertino are in
attendance at each of the five schools of the Fremont Union High School District.
Three of the FUHSD schools are located within the boundaries of the City of Cupertino –
Cupertino High on the east side of the City, Homestead High on the north and Monta Vista on
the west side. Fremont High is located in Sunnyvale and Lynbrook is in the City of San Jose.
5.2. Enrollment Projections
Fremont Union has also been a steadily growing school district. Enrollment has increased, going
from 9,023 in the fall of 2001 to 10,657 in the fall of 2013; this increase of about 18% has been
accommodated in the same five schools in the District. The increase overcrowded many of these
schools, though recent and ongoing construction has temporarily brought capacity up to the level
of enrollment. However, enrollment growth is projected to soon result in a renewed capacity
deficit.
Most of the schools are housing more students than their design capacity, primarily by adding
modular classrooms. Some educational support facilities - cafeteria, assembly areas,
administrative offices, support classrooms for music/art or for students with targeted needs,
playground space and facilities, etc. - are below standard in some of the schools.
5.2.1. Housing Projections
This section sets forth enrollment projections and describes the analysis upon which they are
based. The analysis of enrollment from new homes begins with projections of new residential
development in the District. There are no large vacant land areas available for development in
the portion of the District within the City of Cupertino. The majority of new residential in the
City will occur as either redevelopment of existing commercial properties (such as the Vallco
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 43 June 2014
Shopping Center site) or, to a lesser degree, redevelopment of existing residential properties;
there are only a small number of smaller vacant parcels. In contrast, there are large underused
parcels in the northern portion of the City of Sunnyvale portion of the District and there are
projects from this area in the development pipeline. As a result only about one-third of the units
expected for FUHSD over the next decade are projected to be in the City of Cupertino, even
assuming significant rezoning of housing sites; the majority of the projected units are in the
northern area of the City of Sunnyvale.
The alternatives being evaluated in this EIR have been described elsewhere; the number of
housing units in the District and in the City of Cupertino planned for each alternative were
shown in Table 4-1, which is repeated here as Table 5-1.
Table 5-1
New City of Cupertino Housing Units - FUHSD
Source: City of Cupertino
Alternative A does not change any residential zoning, so its impact does not differ from the
existing General Plan (the no-project alternative). Both the existing Plan and Alternative A
allow for 1,895 additional housing units. Alternatives B (moderate growth) and C (highest
density) allow for 3,316 and 4,421 housing units respectively. All of these totals include some
development in the small portion of the City of Cupertino included within the Santa Clara
Unified District boundaries. Deducting the area’s 50, 350 and 825 units allowed in Alternatives
A, B and C respectively, leaves the units within the CUSD and FUHSD districts. These counts
are shown in the middle row of the table.
The likely time period in which each potential project included in these allowed numbers of units
might take place has been estimated. The first row in the table shows the number of units
allowed in projects identified as likely to be developed in the 2015 through 2023 time period. It
should be remembered that the numbers assume each project is developed to the maximum
allowed density. The comparison of the numbers shown, particularly the developed by 2023
numbers, with the projections of housing development by Enrollment Projection Consultants was
discussed in the CUSD section; the comparison indicated that the estimation of projects
developed by 2023 was reasonable.
Alternatives
Existing
Conditions
Minimal
Growth
A
Moderate
Growth
B
Most
Growth
C
By 2023 1,140 1,140 1,060 1,993
Total Allowed in FUHSD 1,845 1,845 2,966 3,596
Total in City of Cupertino 1,895 1,895 3,316 4,421
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 44 June 2014
5.2.2. Enrollment from New Units
Student Generation Rates
The SGRs overall are extremely large in the City of Cupertino, reflecting the values of the
residents and the quality of the school districts, as discussed above. The four large apartment
projects, with a total of 828 units, constructed since 1995 in CUSD have an average SGR of 0.07
high school students per unit, completing the total K-12 SGR of 0.39 students per home. This is
again very much higher than the SGRs typically found in comparable units throughout the state.
For example, a group of similar new projects in the Sunnyvale School District portion of FHSD,
though none with a convenient neighborhood school, average far fewer students per home.
Enrollment from new Units
The enrollment can be projected simply by multiplying the number of units by the average
student generation rates; the results of doing show are shown in Table 5-2 below. It should be
understood that the projections would tend to be the average of the new developments during
their first decade after occupancy. Many of the projects will increase student generation over the
first couple of decades as younger siblings of young families enter their school years. Student
generation in many will then gradually decrease as the young families age. Over time the
average generation will depend on many factors, including the rate of turn over in occupancy and
the types of families that move into the units.
Table 5-2
Enrollment from New Units* - FUHSD
*In the Cupertino Union School District
Sources: Enrollment Projection Consultants and City of Cupertino
The students potentially generated under the alternatives ranges from 129 students under the
existing conditions and Alternative A to 200+ students generated for the other two alternatives.
The number of students projected to be generated in the first decade (assuming the projects are
built at the maximum density allowed) ranges from about 80 students up to140 for Alternative C.
Fremont Union does not have nearly the amount of intra-district transfers as CUSD does, to
some extent because each of FUHSD’s five campuses is a large school with a comprehensive
program. This makes the information about the attendance area in which new units would be
located more relevant. The distribution among attendance areas is shown in the table below.
Alternatives
SGRs
Existing
Conditions
Minimal
Growth
A
Moderate
Growth
B
Most
Growth
C
By 2023
High school (grades 9-12) 0.07 80 80 74 140
From Total Units Allowed
High school (grades 9-12) 0.07 129 129 208 252
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 45 June 2014
The units allowed in the small portion of the City in the Santa Clara Unified School District are
not included. The table shows that the large majority of the units allowed under each alternative
are in the Cupertino and Monta Vista High School attendance areas.
Table 5-3
Enrollment by School Attendance Areas - FUHSD
New Housing Units in the City of Cupertino
*Enrollment capacity is equal to the number of classrooms times the average student generation rate
of recent projects. The totals are not always exactly the numbers in the prior table due to rounding.
Sources: City of Cupertino and Schoolhouse Services
By 2023 Total
Units Enrollment Units Enrollment
Cupertino
Existing Conditions 2161553738
A - Minimal Growth 2161553738
B - Moderate Growth 816571,19484
C - Most Growth 1,016711,548108
Fremont
Existing Conditions 00504
A - Minimal Growth 00504
B - Moderate Growth 0000
C - Most Growth 00604
Homestead
Existing Conditions 0020014
A - Minimal Growth 0020014
B - Moderate Growth 0040428
C - Most Growth 0047433
Lynbrook
Existing Conditions 0000
A - Minimal Growth 0000
B - Moderate Growth 0000
C - Most Growth 0000
Monta Vista
Existing Conditions 924651,05874
A - Minimal Growth 924651,05874
B - Moderate Growth 244171,36896
C - Most Growth 977681,514106
District Total
Existing Conditions 1,140801,845129
A - Minimal Growth 1,140801,845129
B - Moderate Growth 1,060742,966208
C - Most Growth 1,9931403,596252
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 46 June 2014
5.2.3. Enrollment from All Units
District-Wide
The importance of changes in enrollment from existing housing was emphasized in the
discussion of CUSD enrollment. Enrollment Projection Consultants project that FUHSD’s
enrollment District-wide will be increasing steadily over the next seven years, increasing from a
current enrollment of 10,657 students to 12,036 in the fall of 2020. This is an increase of almost
1,500 students, about 13% of current enrollment. Then, after 2020 the enrollment dip from the
birth rate decrease beginning in 2009 begins, the same dip projected in the next few years for
elementary enrollment and in the time period 2019-2023 for middle schools. Enrollment is
estimated to drop over the following three years by about five percent, following by a recovery;
this still leaves the District at the lowest point about 1,000 students above current levels.
New homes account for only about 250 students of this increase. The majority comes from
existing development in the CUSD, due to the unusually high student generation beginning in the
early grades reaching high school. Substantially more residential development is projected for
the Sunnyvale School District, but the SGR from higher density development there is more
typical for California districts.
By School Attendance Area
EPC’s forecasts indicate that, District-wide, Cupertino High School will have the largest
enrollment increase from now to 2020, about 700 students. It will be followed by Fremont High
with an increase of about 300 students, Homestead with an increase of about 300, and Monta
Vista with about 100 more students. Lynbrook enrollment is projected to decrease by about 150
students.
Table 5-4
Enrollment by High School - FUHSD
Source: Enrollment Projection Consultants
Fall 2013 Fall 2020
Cupertino High School 2,057 2,720
Fremont High School 1,996 2,540
Homestead High School 2,384 2,682
Lynbrook High School 1,846 1,614
Monta Vista High School 2,350 2,480
Other 24 0
District Total 10,657 12,036
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 47 June 2014
5.3. Enrollment Capacities
5.3.1. Capacities by School
The calculation of enrollment capacity is complex with regard to high schools. The students
rotate among the rooms and the class sizes vary widely. Thus a room may have a class of 40
students one period and a class of 20 students during the following period. The FUHSD
administration therefore undertakes a relatively detailed analysis of the District’s facilities and
how they are used and uses that as a basis for planning their usage. For example, the type of
class each room is projected to have for each period of the day is scheduled; capacity is then
based on the average number of students in each type of class. The analysis uses a 85%
efficiency factor, the most common assumption in California school districts.
District staff recently completed an update of the capacity of the District’s facilities; it was
presented to the Board at its January meeting and adopted by the Board for planning purposes at
that meeting. The analysis pictured what the capacity was at the start of this school year and
what it will be at the start of school this fall; it included the availability of buildings now under
construction. The table below shows the capacity for these two years for the District’s five high
schools.
The construction referred to is that funded by Measure B, in which the District’s voters
authorized a bond issue. (The measure is discussed more fully in the next section.) Two more
Measure B construction projects, at Fremont and Homestead High Schools, will add capacity for
184 and 78 students respectively by the start of school in 2015. The expected enrollment
categories for that time are shown in the last column.
Table 5-5
Enrollment Capacities - FUHSD
Sources: Fremont Union High School District and Schoolhouse Services
Fall 2013 Fall 2014 Fall 2015
Cupertino High School 1,794 2,168 2,168
Fremont High School 1,931 1,958 2,142
Homestead High School 2,220 2,279 2,357
Lynbrook High School 1,819 1,819 1,819
Monta Vista High School 2,300 2,410 2,410
District Total 10,064 10,634 10,896
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 48 June 2014
5.3.2. Enrollment Compared to Capacities
The two previous sections have provided information about Fremont Union High School District
enrollment projections and the enrollment capacities of its schools. This section compares the
two to provide information about the extent of stress on District schools.
Table 5-6
Current Enrollment Compared to Capacity - FUHSD
*Attending enrollment is fall 2013 CALPADS enrollment. Resident enrollment is total District enrollment
residing in the school’s attendance area.
***Attending exceeds resident enrollment due to children of teachers and other staff attending.
Source: Enrollment Projection Consultants
The table in the Attending Difference column shows that, in contrast to the significant capacity
deficits at the Cupertino elementary schools, attendance at each of the high schools shown is
within five percent of the capacity shown in Table 5-5 based on the District’s standards. For the
District as a whole, enrollment is almost exactly equal to capacity. Since there is relatively little
intra-district transferring, the picture is pretty much the same for the capacity comparison with
resident enrollment. The difference at Cupertino High, the school with the most significant
deficit, is somewhat larger.
Again, it can be seen that the enrollment/capacity difference is 146 students greater for Attending
than for Resident. The extra students are from the families of District teachers and other staff.
The District, and essentially all California districts, allows such students to attend its schools.
The table below repeats the comparison, but with projected enrollment in 2020 compared with
the capacity available when the improvements funded by Measure H are completed. The
situation is projected to change significantly by 2020. The capacity deficit has grown by about
1,000 students. Cupertino, Fremont and Homestead High Schools all have capacity deficits of
over 300 students, with Cupertino under the greatest stress.
Capacity
Attending
Enrollment*
Attending
Difference
Resident
Enrollment*
Resident
Difference
Cupertino High School 2,168 2,057 -111 2,015 -153
Fremont High School 2,142 1,996 38 2,008 50
Homestead High School 2,357 2,384 105 2,378 99
Lynbrook High School 1,819 1,846 27 1,756 -63
Monta Vista High School 2,410 2,350 -60 2,354 -56
Other NA 24 NA
District Total 10,634 10,657 23 10,511 -123
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 49 June 2014
Table 5-7
2020 Enrollment Compared to Capacity - FUHSD
* Resident enrollment is District enrollment residing in the school’s attendance area.
Source: Enrollment Projection Consultants and Schoolhouse Services
5.3.3. Facility Improvement Plans
The District has been making improvements to modernize obsolete facilities and add enrollment
capacity. Most of these have been funded with bond issues , though developer fee revenues have
also contributed. In April 1998 District voters approved Measure H, a $144 million school bond
measure that, in conjunction with state proposition 1A and 47 funds, provided the backbone for a
district-wide renovation and modernization program aimed at addressing school facilities
deficiencies, as well as creating state of the art modern schools. In 2008 the voters approved
Measure B authorizing $198 million for school improvements.
School District staff is, on a preliminary basis, looking into other projects that will presumably
be needed given the enrollment growth forecast by Enrollment Projection Consultants, but
funding has not been identified and the Board has not studied them. The recent substantial
improvements have solved enrollment capacity challenges for the present. However, it is clear
that more investments in facilities need to be made and that, despite the recent construction, they
will be needed sooner rather than later.
FUHSD has approximately the same variety of options to provide additional capacity, and there
is no need to describe them again here. As noted above, new two-story buildings on existing
campuses are the most likely option. Like CUSD, Fremont Union has a closed school. The
District is currently leasing out the former Sunnyvale High School site and it could, in theory, be
taken back and renovated for use as a high school. However, the condition of the campus is such
that it’s likely that it would be less expensive to demolish the buildings there and build anew
than to renovate them. And the campus is currently subject to multiple long-term leases; even
after the leases expire, taking the campus back would, in effect, result in a large land cost. The
District has decided that it would not be feasible to use the campus as a comprehensive high
school serving the Cupertino and Sunnyvale communities.
Capacity
Resident
Enrollment*
Capacity
Deficit
Cupertino High School 2,168 2,720 552
Fremont High School 2,142 2,540 398
Homestead High School 2,357 2,682 325
Lynbrook High School 1,819 1,614 -205
Monta Vista High School 2,410 2,480 70
District Total 10,896 12,036 1,140
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 50 June 2014
Some of the need could be met with repurposing the use of existing space. As an example of a
modest need, FUHSD maintains a program to assist Special Education (SDC) Students in their
integration into the community after the age of 18. The program requires an organizational
center which functions as a base even as the students spend the majority of the time at jobs out in
the community. There is no need for the base to be located on a comprehensive high school
campus, so FUHSD is seeking an off-campus location. This is a small example, but it illustrates
a needed space and one that might be supplied by supplemental mitigation.
The need for an Adult Education Campus is an example of a much larger facility need. The
Adult Education Program is currently located at the District Office. Moving it could end up
providing more space for standard grades 9-12 education. The program currently consists of
1 main office and 1 preschool office
4 preschool classrooms
2 computer labs and
10 other classrooms
Below is an example of a large eight building Campus (a prior elementary school) that the
District believed would meet the needs of its growing Adult Education Program.
Building Square
Footage
Intended Use
1 6,354 Offices, Gym, Multi-Purpose/Training Center, Kitchen
2 1,272 Offices
3 2,852 Classrooms, Outdoor Garden Area
4 4,500 Classrooms
5 4,500 Classrooms, Computer Lab
6 4,500 Classrooms
7 4,500 Classrooms
8 5,250 Classrooms, Art Classrooms, Ceramics, Ikebana,
Other improvements that staff believe could add to the FUHSD’s educational program, and
specially benefit the community, are listed below.
The Adult and Community Education program could also benefit from additional space
throughout the community, to help serve the more than 35,000 Adult students that take at
least one course per year
Staff/Community Day care facility - 8,000 – 10,000 square feet plus playground,
replacing the current day care facility located on the Cupertino High School Campus
Satellite Career/Technical training center(s) - 40,000 – 50,000 square feet to house
the wide variety of career and technical programs offered by the District
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 51 June 2014
5.4. Fiscal Impacts
5.4.1. Facilities Costs
The Fremont Union High School District will have adequate enrollment capacity when the
classroom additions at Fremont and Homestead High Schools are completed; however, that will
only be the case for a year or so. After that, the much larger classes now in the later years of
elementary school will be entered high school and enrollment will fairly quickly exceed capacity.
FUHSD would find it even more difficult than CUSD to add capacity other than in additional
facilities at its existing campuses. The assumption made here is therefore that the increased
enrollment will be accommodated by the construction of one or more classroom wings at one or
more high schools and improvements to support facilities (such as libraries and cafeteria space)
to allow the campus to function with a significantly larger enrollment than the design of the
campus anticipated.
With the projects funded by the bond issue now under construction, the District has current data
on its cost of construction in the building of additional classrooms. One of the projects is the
construction of a classroom and cafeteria building being constructed at Fremont High School. It
is a two-story building with 30,000 square feet of floor space. The cost is $22.0 million, which is
$733 per square foot. Similarly, a classroom and cafeteria building at Homestead High School
has 17,000 square feet and cost $12.6 million, or $741 per square foot. These costs are higher
than the CUSD cost of new classroom buildings. The reasons include that the buildings are
being constructed on-site rather than prefabricated off-site, that they are designed to receive high
LEED ratings, and that cafeteria space is usually more expensive than classroom space.
The California School Facility (CSF) program uses a size standard of 95 square feet per high
school student. This standard includes space for academic support activities. This standard
times a $733 per square foot cost results in $69,600 as the cost of adding capacity to FUHSD
schools. These costs per student times the number of students generated by each alternative
project the cost of capital facilities to accommodate additional students.
Table 5-8
Costs of Additional Capacity per Alternative - FUHSD
Students
by 2023
Costs
(in millions)
Total
Students
Costs
(in millions)
Existing Conditions 80 $5.57 129 $8.98
A - Minimal Growth 80 $5.57 129 $8.98
B - Moderate Growth 74 $5.15 208 $14.48
C - Most Growth 140 $9.75 252 $17.55 Source: Schoolhouse Services
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 52 June 2014
5.4.2. Development Impact Fee Revenues
Amount of New Development
The amount of new development on which fees can be levied would be the same for FUHSD as
it would be for CUSD.
Impact Fee Revenues
FUHSD is also eligible to levy Level 1 development impact fees on new residential
development. By agreement with CUSD, Fremont Union is entitled to 40% of the current
maximum fee of $3.36 per square foot, or $1.34 per square foot.
The fee at $1.34 per square foot on an average of 1,100 square feet per unit generates a gross fee
of $1,474 per unit. As discussed in the CUSD section on development impact fee revenues,
FUHSD will deduct a credit from the gross fee whenever improvements are being demolished to
allow for redevelopment, estimated here at an average of 7.5% of the gross fee. After deducting
7.5% for the credit on demolished buildings, the average fee revenue is $1,363 per unit. The
resulting fee revenue for each of the alternatives is shown in the table below.
Table 5-9
Development Impact Fee Revenue – FUHSD
Units
by 2023
Revenues
(in millions)
Total
Units
Revenues
(in millions)
Existing Conditions 1,140 $1.55 1,845 $2.51
A - Minimal Growth 1,140 $1.55 1,845 $2.51
B - Moderate Growth 1,060 $1.44 2,966 $4.04
C - Most Growth 1,993 $2.72 3,596 $4.90
Source: Schoolhouse Services
Comparison of Capital Facilities Costs and Development Impact Fee Revenue
Table 5-10 shows the calculation of the difference between capital cost impact and the
development impact fees likely to be generated by the development allowed under each
alternative. Revenue from development fees covers a little less than 30% of the cost of facilities
to accommodate the enrollment generated. This is somewhat better than the situation with
CUSD due to the fact that its SGR for new apartment units is only 20% of CUSD’s SGR, while it
receives 40% of the impact fee revenue, even though its costs appear to be significantly higher.
It still leaves the necessity for FUHSD to raise about 70% of the needed funding elsewhere.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 53 June 2014
Table 5-10
Development Impact Fees Versus Facilities Costs (in $ millions) - FUHSD*
Units by 2023 Total Units
Cost Revenue Net Cost Cost Revenue Net Cost
Existing Conditions $5.57 $1.55 $4.02 $8.98 $2.51 $6.47
A - Minimal Growth $5.57 $1.55 $4.02 $8.98 $2.51 $6.47
B - Moderate Growth $5.15 $1.44 $3.71 $14.48 $4.04 $10.44
C - Most Growth $9.75 $2.72 $7.03 $17.55 $4.90 $12.65
* Both fee revenue and facilities costs are one-time, rather than annual, estimates.
Source: Schoolhouse Services
5.4.3. Operating Costs
The cost per student estimate is simply a calculation of the operating expenditures divided by the
number of students, as shown in Table 5-11. The cost impacts for the alternatives are shown in
Table 5-12. As with CUSD, the majority of District operating expenditures are for classroom
costs and thus increase in direct proportion to enrollment; most other expenditures are also likely
to increase, at least to some extent, as enrollment increases. Thus, the marginal operating cost to
serve additional students is close to the overall operating cost per student.
Table 5-11
Operating Costs - FUHSD
Sources: FUHSD 2013-14 budget
Table 5-12
Annual Operating Costs – FUHSD
Units
by 2023
Costs
(in millions)
Total
Units
Costs
(in millions)
Existing Conditions 80 $0.86 129 $1.39
A - Minimal Growth 80 $0.86 129 $1.39
B - Moderate Growth 74 $0.80 208 $2.25
C - Most Growth 140 $1.51 252 $2.72
Source: Schoolhouse Services
Operating Budget $115 million
Enrollment 10,657
Operating Cost per Student $10,800
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 54 June 2014
5.4.4. Operating Revenues
Property Tax Revenue
FUHSD is one of the relatively few districts in the state that is not a revenue limit district. The
District’s per student property tax is moderately above the amount of per student revenue limit
funding guaranteed by the state. Because there is no state supplement to property tax revenues,
state revenue does not increase when additional students are enrolled. However, new
development generates additional property taxes, increasing the District’s revenues. The
property tax revenues will be equal to the District’s share of the property tax rate times the fair
market value established by the Santa Clara County Assessor at the time each building is
completed.
Table 5-13 shows the calculation of the property taxes for each of the alternatives. The District’s
share of the base property tax (equal to one percent of assessed property value) varies moderately
depending on the tax code area in which a project is located, but it is about 17% of the total
throughout the City. The property tax generated by the units depends on their assessed values;
the average value is estimated to be $600,000. The basic tax rate (excluding parcel taxes and
bond payment taxes, both of which have to be approved by the voters) is one percent of assessed
value, or $6,000 per year. The district’s share at 17% is $1,020 per unit. If this analysis included
property tax revenue from the non-residential sites where the residents work and shop, the tax
receipts would be significantly larger.
Table 5-13
Property Tax Revenues - FUHSD
Units
by 2023
Revenue
(in millions)
Total
Units
Revenue
(in millions)
Existing Conditions 1,140 $1.16 1,845 $1.88
A - Minimal Growth 1,140 $1.16 1,845 $1.88
B - Moderate Growth 1,060 $1.08 2,966 $3.03
C - Most Growth 1,993 $2.03 3,596 $3.67
Source: Schoolhouse Services
Other Revenues
The federal and state governments fund a variety of programs that provide modest revenues to
the District. Local revenues to the District (other than the property taxes) constitute a far smaller
source of funds; these include rental income from leased property, lottery proceeds, parcel taxes,
etc. The majority of the revenue from these sources will probably increase about as fast as
enrollment, the revenue from others will probably be relatively independent of additional
students. Overall, however, given the large share of revenues that will increase with additional
students, operating revenues are likely to increase almost proportionately with enrollment.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 55 June 2014
Total revenues from all sources other than property taxes in the current fiscal year is $23 million,
or $2,160 per student. Table 5-14 shows estimated total annual operating revenues to FUHSD
for each alternative.
Table 5-14
Total Annual Operating Revenues (in $Millions) – FUHSD
Units by 2023 Total Units
Property
Taxes
Other
Revenue
Total
Revenue
Property
Taxes
Other
Revenue
Total
Revenue
Existing Conditions $1.16 $0.17 $1.33 $1.88 $0.28 $2.16
A - Minimal Growth $1.16 $0.17 $1.33 $1.88 $0.28 $2.16
B - Moderate Growth $1.08 $0.16 $1.24 $3.03 $0.45 $3.48
C - Most Growth $2.03 $0.30 $2.33 $3.67 $0.54 $4.21
Source: Schoolhouse Services
Comparison of Operating Revenues with Operating Costs
Annual revenues are compared with annual operating costs in Table 5-15. Revenues
significantly exceed costs, by over 50%. This disparity is due primarily to the relatively low (for
the Cupertino area) student generation of apartments.
Table 5-15
Total Annual Operating Revenues versus Costs (in Millions) – FUHSD
Units by 2023 Total Units
Revenue Costs Net Revenue Costs Net
Existing Conditions $1.33 $0.86 $0.47 $2.16 $1.39 $0.77
A - Minimal Growth $1.33 $0.86 $0.47 $2.16 $1.39 $0.77
B - Moderate Growth $1.24 $0.80 $0.44 $3.48 $2.25 $1.23
C - Most Growth $2.34 $1.51 $0.83 $4.21 $2.72 $1.49
Source: Schoolhouse Services
5.4.5. Additional Financial Consideration
The voters of FUHSD have approved several bond measures for campus improvements. Debt
service on the bond issues is spread among property tax payers proportional to assessed value.
Each new unit would pay about $240 in annual debt service. The construction of all the units
allowed in the projects in each alternative would generate the annual tax payments for debt
service shown of between about $500,000 and $1,000,000.
It should be understood, however, that these revenues do not directly increase the funds available
to FUHSD. The bond issues and associated debt service are fixed amounts. The assessed value
of new development increases the total assessed value, spreading the debt service among a larger
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 56 June 2014
tax base and allowing the bonds to be paid off sooner. And on any future bond measures, the
additional assessed value would increase the revenue generated for any given tax rate.
Finally, revenues to FUHSD come from all private property, residential and non-residential, but
revenues from non-residential development have not been included in this analysis. Only the
revenues coming from the new residential development have been included. Since non-
residential properties do not directly generate school district costs, this makes the operating cost
vs. revenue analysis not nearly as positive as it would be with a broader more balanced picture.
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 57 June 2014
6. Santa Clara Unified School District
6.1. Current Conditions
The small area in the northeast corner of the City of Cupertino that is not served by CUSD and
FUHSD is located within the boundaries of the Santa Clara Unified School District (SCUSD).
The Santa Clara District serves the area on the southeast of the City generally from Cupertino
and Sunnyvale to the northern part of the City of San Jose.
SCUSD has been a gradually growing district for the last decade, with enrollment increasing
from 13,976 in the fall of 2003 to 15,394 in 2013. Enrollment Projection Consultants is also the
demographer for SCUSD. The firm projects enrollment increasing to 17,360 in 2023, an
increase of 13%. Current and projected enrollments for the different grade levels are shown
below.
Table 6-1
Projected Enrollment
Fall 2013 Fall 2023
Grades K-5 8,115 9,083
Grades 6-8 3,123 3,642
Grades 9-12 4,156 4,635
Total 15,394 17,360
Source: Enrollment Projection Consultants
EPC estimates that 10,500 new units will be constructed in the District over the next decade.
Ninety percent of them are expected to be apartments. Student generation per household in
SCUSD is not nearly as high as it is in CUSD and FUHSD. In particular, enrollment from recent
large apartment projects developed in SCUSD have generated few students. However, they have
generally been situated such that the school of attendance has not been in the same
neighborhood.
The principal opportunity for development in SCUSD but within the City of Cupertino included
in the alternatives is redevelopment of the Hamptons. This 342 unit apartment complex is
immediately adjacent to the large Apple office campus currently under construction. Its low-rise
buildings result in a fairly low density development with relatively large units, and it includes a
small play area with equipment and some grass play area private to the complex.
The Hamptons is in the Laurelwood Elementary School attendance area; the school is located a
little over 1.5 miles away. Middle School students attend Peterson Middle School and high
school students attend Wilcox High School. Current enrollment from the Hamptons is 66
students, almost all of them in elementary school. There are only five middle school students
and four high school students. The student generation rates for the three grade levels are thus
0.17 for elementary and 0.01 for middle and high school. The elementary SGR is quite high for
apartments in SCUSD, especially with the school being in a different neighborhood, a sign of the
Hamptons’ attractiveness for young families. The other SGRs are very low, reflecting the
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 58 June 2014
limited opportunities for on-site recreation and the isolation from other residential units and
parks.
6.2. Enrollment Projections
The “no project” and A alternatives assume opportunities for 50 units in this area. These units
might generate about 10 students.
Alternatives B and C assume redevelopment of the Hamptons complex to a significantly higher
density, but without any other units being developed in the area. For Alternative B the current
number of units would be increased to 662 units, an increase of 350 units. The total would be
increased to 1,167 units in Alternative C, an increase of 825 units.
The SGRs for these units would be expected to be far lower than those current in the low-rise
buildings. Given the expected small size of the new units and the height of the buildings that
would be necessary, the SGR would probably be at the low end of future apartments in SCUSD.
For Alternative B, SGRs of 0.04, 0.02 and 0.02 for elementary, middle and high school
respectively would generate 25, 13 and13 students for the three grade levels. These SGRs are
significantly higher than the demographer has found for recent apartment complexes in SCUSD.
The total of about 50 students is less than the existing enrollment from the Hamptons.
For Alternative C, the number of units would be greater, but the student generation per unit
would be less. The resulting student generation would perhaps be about the same, and almost
certainly not much greater. In summary, for the “no project and A alternatives, 50 units would
probably generate about 10 students, without any decrease in enrollment. The redevelopment of
the Hamptons site, removing its current enrollment, would probably result in roughly the same
number of students as currently reside in the existing more family friendly units.
In summary, the enrollment impact will probably not be greater than about 10 students, and it
could be either an increase or a decrease. In comparison, the District must plan to accommodate
about 2,000 additional students over the next decade.
6.3. Fiscal Impacts
6.3.1. Capital Facilities Cost and Revenue Impacts
Each unit would be responsible for approximately $3,600 in gross school development impact
fees. This amount would be subject to a credit for any space demolished. Development fee
revenue to SCUSD for the “no project” alternative and Alternative A would be modest, about
$150,000. The cost of providing capacity can only be roughly estimated without a plan for the
facilities involved. The amounts the State provides for new capacity at schools is based on an
average cost for K-12 students of between $20,000 and $25,000 per student; this cost is probably
a low estimate; double the amount could be appropriate.
The fee for the redevelopment of the Hamptons site would probably be calculated based on the
net addition of square feet. The fees would total about one million dollars for Alternative B and
City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Schoolhouse Services 59 June 2014
close to three million for Alternative C. In either case the revenues would significantly exceed
the costs of additional capacity, if there is any.
6.3.2. Operating Cost and Revenue Impacts
Since none of the alternatives has a large enrollment impact, the operating cost impact would be
modest, a net cost for Alternative A and perhaps a small increase or decrease for Alternatives B
and C.
Like FUHSD, SCUSD is a “basic aid” district. Its property tax revenues are sufficient for it not
to receive any supplemental funding from the state. However, the property taxes from new
development accrue to the District. SCUSD’s share of the property taxes from the “no project”
and Alternative A properties is estimated to be about $60,000 annually. This could be only about
two-thirds of the operating cost incurred due to the students residing there. If the tax revenue
from balanced non-residential development were included, the picture would be much more
favorable.
The annual property taxes received by SCUSD from the redevelopment of the Hamptons in
Alternative B and Alternative C would be in the magnitude of $700,000 and over a million
dollars respectively. Similar to the situation with development fees, the operating cost impact, if
there is any, would be very small in comparison.
........................................................................................................................
APPENDIX G:
TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC DATA
........................................................................................................................
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #1: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:449***2 1008
Lanes:1 0 0 1 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0*** 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1098 3 Critical V/C:0.542 2 934***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):24.5 0
172 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):27.5 2 138
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 1008 2 449 0 1098 172 138 934 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 1008 2 449 0 1098 172 138 934 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 1008 2 449 0 1098 172 138 934 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 1008 2 449 0 1098 172 138 934 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 1008 2 449 0 1098 172 138 934 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 1008 2 449 0 1098 172 138 934 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.87 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.99 0.01 1.00 0.00 3.44 0.56 2.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 4940 10 1750 0 6483 1015 3150 3800 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.26 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.25 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.7 58.7 58.7 0.0 42.2 42.2 14.1 56.3 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.54 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.39 0.54 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.7 21.7 23.8 0.0 32.6 32.6 51.7 24.9 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.7 21.7 23.8 0.0 32.6 32.6 51.7 24.9 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A C+ C+ C A C-C-D-C A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 10 10 13 0 9 9 3 12 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-2
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #1: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:561***27 691
Lanes:1 0 0 1 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:9/6/2012 Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1080*** 3 Critical V/C:0.569 2 639
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):30.2 0
165 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):25.1 2 145***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 6 Sep 2012 << 4:55-5:55
Base Vol: 0 0 0 691 27 561 0 1080 165 145 639 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 691 27 561 0 1080 165 145 639 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 691 27 561 0 1080 165 145 639 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 691 27 561 0 1080 165 145 639 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 691 27 561 0 1080 165 145 639 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 691 27 561 0 1080 165 145 639 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.87 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.90 0.10 1.00 0.00 3.45 0.55 2.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 4762 186 1750 0 6504 994 3150 3800 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.32 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.05 0.17 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 78.8 78.8 78.8 0.0 40.8 40.8 11.3 52.2 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.45 0.00
Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.6 15.6 19.7 0.0 42.1 42.1 62.0 33.1 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.4 0.4 3.0 0.2 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.73 0.73 0.94 0.60 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.7 15.7 20.5 0.0 30.9 30.9 61.4 20.2 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.7 15.7 20.5 0.0 30.9 30.9 61.4 20.2 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A B B C+ A C C E C+ A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 6 6 17 0 9 9 4 7 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-3
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #2: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:29 71***4
Lanes:0 0 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
771*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1335 3 Critical V/C:0.836 3 602***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):52.9 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):42.8 0 0
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 1!0 1
Final Vol:441***49 364
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 NB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 441 49 364 4 71 29 771 1335 0 0 602 551
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 441 49 364 4 71 29 771 1335 0 0 602 551
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 441 49 364 4 71 29 771 1335 0 0 602 551
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 441 49 364 4 71 29 771 1335 0 0 602 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 441 49 364 4 71 29 771 1335 0 0 602 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 441 49 364 4 71 29 771 1335 0 0 602 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.65 0.07 1.28 0.08 1.36 0.56 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1172 130 2234 138 2458 1004 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.38 0.38 0.16 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.24 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 52.8 52.8 52.8 10.0 10.0 10.0 34.4 49.2 0.0 0.0 14.8 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.88 0.88 0.38 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.88 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.00
Delay/Veh: 42.4 42.4 24.5 54.7 54.7 54.7 53.5 29.9 0.0 0.0 66.8 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 42.4 42.4 24.5 54.7 54.7 54.7 53.5 29.9 0.0 0.0 66.8 0.0
LOS by Move: D D C D-D-D-D-C A A E A
HCM2kAvgQ: 28 28 8 2 2 2 18 13 0 0 8 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #2: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 9 11***
Lanes:0 0 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
484*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1276 3 Critical V/C:0.435 3 589***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):34.4 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):19.5 0 0
LOS:B-
Lanes:0 0 1!0 1
Final Vol:157***4 180
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 NB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 157 4 180 11 9 0 484 1276 0 0 589 580
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 157 4 180 11 9 0 484 1276 0 0 589 580
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 157 4 180 11 9 0 484 1276 0 0 589 580
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 157 4 180 11 9 0 484 1276 0 0 589 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 157 4 180 11 9 0 484 1276 0 0 589 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 157 4 180 11 9 0 484 1276 0 0 589 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.62 0.02 1.36 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1095 28 2377 1750 1900 0 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.14 0.08 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 43.3 43.3 43.3 10.0 10.0 0.0 46.4 77.7 0.0 0.0 31.2 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.46 0.46 0.24 0.09 0.07 0.00 0.46 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00
Uniform Del: 39.0 39.0 36.1 60.7 60.6 0.0 36.9 17.9 0.0 0.0 47.1 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.5 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.67 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00
Delay/Veh: 39.4 39.4 36.2 60.9 60.7 0.0 25.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 38.4 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 39.4 39.4 36.2 60.9 60.7 0.0 25.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 38.4 0.0
LOS by Move: D D D+ E E A C A A A D+ A
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 9 5 1 0 0 7 2 0 0 6 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-5
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #3: Stevens Creek Blvd and Stelling Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:132 276***143
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
237*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 123
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
489 3 Critical V/C:0.609 2 709***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):44.4 0
180 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):42.4 2 333
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:272***471 156
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Road Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 272 471 156 143 276 132 237 489 180 333 709 123
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 272 471 156 143 276 132 237 489 180 333 709 123
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 272 471 156 143 276 132 237 489 180 333 709 123
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 272 471 156 143 276 132 237 489 180 333 709 123
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 272 471 156 143 276 132 237 489 180 333 709 123
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 272 471 156 143 276 132 237 489 180 333 709 123
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.34 0.66 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.54 0.46
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 1750 2502 1197 1750 5700 1750 3150 4771 828
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.12 0.09 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.14 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.15 0.15
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 31.7 32.6 32.6 21.5 22.5 22.5 27.6 28.5 28.5 29.3 30.3 30.3
Volume/Cap: 0.61 0.47 0.34 0.47 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.37 0.45 0.45 0.61 0.61
Delay/Veh: 43.1 38.8 37.4 47.3 48.3 48.3 46.1 40.4 41.8 40.8 42.4 42.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 43.1 38.8 37.4 47.3 48.3 48.3 46.1 40.4 41.8 40.8 42.4 42.4
LOS by Move: D D+ D+ D D D D D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 10 8 5 6 8 8 9 5 6 6 9 9
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-6
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #3: Stevens Creek Blvd and Stelling Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:129 425***251
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
249*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 157
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
870 3 Critical V/C:0.599 2 807***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):39.7 0
334 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):37.5 2 292
LOS:D+
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:146***270 146
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Road Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 146 270 146 251 425 129 249 870 334 292 807 157
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 146 270 146 251 425 129 249 870 334 292 807 157
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 146 270 146 251 425 129 249 870 334 292 807 157
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 146 270 146 251 425 129 249 870 334 292 807 157
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 146 270 146 251 425 129 249 870 334 292 807 157
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 146 270 146 251 425 129 249 870 334 292 807 157
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.52 0.48 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.49 0.51
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 1750 2838 861 1750 5700 1750 3150 4687 912
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.07 0.08 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.19 0.09 0.17 0.17
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.5 20.0 20.0 34.5 35.0 35.0 33.3 49.5 49.5 24.0 40.2 40.2
Volume/Cap: 0.60 0.50 0.58 0.58 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.43 0.54 0.54 0.60 0.60
Uniform Del: 56.6 55.3 56.1 46.4 46.3 46.3 47.4 34.5 36.2 52.9 42.9 42.9
IncremntDel: 4.1 0.7 3.5 2.0 1.1 1.1 2.4 0.1 1.0 1.1 0.6 0.6
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.79 0.64 0.64 0.86 0.73 0.73
Delay/Veh: 60.7 56.0 59.5 48.5 47.4 47.4 40.0 22.1 24.0 46.7 32.0 32.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 60.7 56.0 59.5 48.5 47.4 47.4 40.0 22.1 24.0 46.7 32.0 32.0
LOS by Move: E E+ E+ D D D D C+ C D C-C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 6 7 11 11 11 9 7 9 6 10 10
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-7
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #4: Fremont Ave/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:136 815 111***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
389*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 143
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
504 2 Critical V/C:0.723 2 639***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):41.4 0
115 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):40.9 2 165
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:176 1772***100
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road Fremonve Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 176 1772 100 111 815 136 389 504 115 165 639 143
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 176 1772 100 111 815 136 389 504 115 165 639 143
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 176 1772 100 111 815 136 389 504 115 165 639 143
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 176 1772 100 111 815 136 389 504 115 165 639 143
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 176 1772 100 111 815 136 389 504 115 165 639 143
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 176 1772 100 111 815 136 389 504 115 165 639 143
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 0.98 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.83 0.17 2.00 2.56 0.44 2.00 2.42 0.58 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5300 299 3150 4798 801 3150 4558 1040 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.33 0.33 0.04 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.05 0.17 0.08
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 17.7 64.6 64.6 7.0 53.9 53.9 23.9 38.3 38.3 18.1 32.5 32.5
Volume/Cap: 0.44 0.72 0.72 0.70 0.44 0.44 0.72 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.72 0.35
Delay/Veh: 57.3 31.5 31.5 79.0 32.0 32.0 59.8 41.7 41.7 56.6 52.6 45.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 57.3 31.5 31.5 79.0 32.0 32.0 59.8 41.7 41.7 56.6 52.6 45.5
LOS by Move: E+ C C E-C-C-E+ D D E+ D-D
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 21 21 4 10 10 11 7 7 4 14 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-8
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #4: Fremont Ave/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:373 1792***289
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
389 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 147
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1014*** 2 Critical V/C:0.795 2 438
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):42.6 0
215 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):43.9 2 194***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:187***819 148
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road Fremonve Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 187 819 148 289 1792 373 389 1014 215 194 438 147
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 187 819 148 289 1792 373 389 1014 215 194 438 147
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 187 819 148 289 1792 373 389 1014 215 194 438 147
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 187 819 148 289 1792 373 389 1014 215 194 438 147
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 187 819 148 289 1792 373 389 1014 215 194 438 147
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 187 819 148 289 1792 373 389 1014 215 194 438 147
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.52 0.48 2.00 2.46 0.54 2.00 2.46 0.54 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 4742 857 3150 4634 965 3150 4619 979 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.09 0.39 0.39 0.12 0.22 0.22 0.06 0.12 0.08
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.4 51.3 51.3 27.2 68.1 68.1 25.6 38.6 38.6 10.8 23.9 23.9
Volume/Cap: 0.80 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.80 0.80 0.68 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.68 0.49
Uniform Del: 63.7 34.0 34.0 50.0 30.1 30.1 53.3 47.0 47.0 63.5 54.4 52.6
IncremntDel: 16.9 0.2 0.2 0.6 1.7 1.7 3.2 3.0 3.0 16.4 2.8 1.3
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 80.7 34.2 34.2 50.6 31.8 31.8 56.5 50.0 50.0 79.9 57.3 53.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 80.7 34.2 34.2 50.6 31.8 31.8 56.5 50.0 50.0 79.9 57.3 53.8
LOS by Move: F C-C-D C C E+ D D E-E+ D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 10 10 7 27 27 10 18 18 7 10 7
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-9
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #5: Homestead Road and De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:91 1286 145***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
357*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 400
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
460 2 Critical V/C:0.768 1 525***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):42.0 0
343 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):43.2 2 444
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:296 1621***58
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.98 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.79 0.21 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.11 0.89
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5229 370 3150 3800 1750 3150 2099 1599
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.28 0.03 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.11 0.12 0.20 0.14 0.25 0.25
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 14.7 45.9 45.9 7.4 38.6 38.6 18.3 34.1 34.1 24.5 40.4 40.4
Volume/Cap: 0.79 0.77 0.09 0.77 0.79 0.79 0.77 0.44 0.71 0.71 0.77 0.77
Delay/Veh: 63.9 36.1 25.5 74.7 41.5 41.5 58.4 37.4 45.5 50.3 40.7 40.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 63.9 36.1 25.5 74.7 41.5 41.5 58.4 37.4 45.5 50.3 40.7 40.7
LOS by Move: E D+ C E D D E+ D+ D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 18 1 4 17 17 10 7 14 9 16 16
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-10
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #5: Homestead Road and De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:180 1709***481
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Ignore Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
145 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 181
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
665*** 2 Critical V/C:0.825 1 453
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):39.5 0
0 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):37.2 2 302***
LOS:D+
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:461***1231 578
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 0 302 453 181
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 0 302 453 181
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 0 302 453 181
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.98 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.70 0.30 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.41 0.59
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5066 534 3150 3800 1750 3150 2643 1056
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.22 0.33 0.15 0.34 0.34 0.05 0.17 0.00 0.10 0.17 0.17
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 24.8 56.1 56.1 25.9 57.2 57.2 10.4 29.7 0.0 16.3 35.6 35.6
Volume/Cap: 0.83 0.54 0.82 0.82 0.83 0.83 0.62 0.83 0.00 0.83 0.67 0.67
Uniform Del: 55.5 32.1 37.5 54.8 36.9 36.9 62.9 52.7 0.0 60.5 47.0 47.0
IncremntDel: 9.8 0.3 7.9 9.3 2.6 2.6 5.1 7.0 0.0 14.2 2.0 2.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.86 0.55 0.55 0.85 0.54 0.54 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 57.3 18.0 28.7 55.8 22.5 22.5 68.0 59.7 0.0 74.7 49.0 49.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 57.3 18.0 28.7 55.8 22.5 22.5 68.0 59.7 0.0 74.7 49.0 49.0
LOS by Move: E+ B-C E+ C+ C+ E E+ A E D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 12 9 21 11 20 20 5 15 0 8 11 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-11
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #6: De Anza Blvd and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:538***1575 0
Lanes:0 1 4 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 582
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.920 1!7***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):47.6 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):33.9 1 850
LOS:C-
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:418***1446 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 418 1446 0 0 1575 538 0 0 0 850 7 582
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 418 1446 0 0 1575 538 0 0 0 850 7 582
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 418 1446 0 0 1575 538 0 0 0 850 7 582
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 418 1446 0 0 1575 538 0 0 0 850 7 582
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 418 1446 0 0 1575 538 0 0 0 850 7 582
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 418 1446 0 0 1575 538 0 0 0 850 7 582
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.59 0.01 1.40
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 7600 1750 0 0 0 2779 17 2454
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.41 0.24
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 17.9 59.3 0.0 0.0 41.4 41.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.7 55.7 55.7
Volume/Cap: 0.92 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.92 0.53
Delay/Veh: 76.2 22.8 0.0 0.0 35.0 46.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.0 41.3 24.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 76.2 22.8 0.0 0.0 35.0 46.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.0 41.3 24.9
LOS by Move: E-C+ A A D+ D A A A C D C
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 12 0 0 12 22 0 0 0 18 32 12
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-12
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #6: De Anza Blvd and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:357 1912***0
Lanes:0 1 4 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 664
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.924 1!1***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):47.9 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):33.0 1 659
LOS:C-
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:769***1608 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.49 0.01 1.50
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 7918 1478 0 0 0 2620 3 2627
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.24 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.38 0.25
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 37.0 73.6 0.0 0.0 36.6 36.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.4 57.4 57.4
Volume/Cap: 0.92 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.92 0.62
Uniform Del: 50.1 21.9 0.0 0.0 50.3 50.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 32.6 39.2 32.6
IncremntDel: 15.7 0.2 0.0 0.0 6.5 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 10.3 0.5
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.76 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 53.8 5.9 0.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.1 49.5 33.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 53.8 5.9 0.0 0.0 45.0 45.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.1 49.5 33.2
LOS by Move: D-A A A D D A A A C-D C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 21 6 0 0 19 19 0 0 0 16 33 16
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-13
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #7: De Anza Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 1783 642***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
616 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
17*** 1! Critical V/C:0.859 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):46.0 0
634 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):34.2 0 0
LOS:C-
Lanes:0 0 5 0 1
Final Vol:0 1248 396***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1248 396 642 1783 0 616 17 634 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1248 396 642 1783 0 616 17 634 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1248 396 642 1783 0 616 17 634 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1248 396 642 1783 0 616 17 634 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1248 396 642 1783 0 616 17 634 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1248 396 642 1783 0 616 17 634 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.48 0.03 1.49 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2590 46 2614 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.13 0.23 0.20 0.31 0.00 0.24 0.37 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 32.7 32.7 29.4 62.1 0.0 52.9 52.9 52.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.50 0.86 0.86 0.62 0.00 0.56 0.86 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 38.9 58.4 55.2 23.0 0.0 27.0 37.5 27.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 38.9 58.4 55.2 23.0 0.0 27.0 37.5 27.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D+ E+ E+ C+ A C D+ C A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 8 18 15 16 0 13 26 13 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-14
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #7: De Anza Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 1989 555***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
453 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
3*** 1! Critical V/C:0.822 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):43.6 0
435 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):18.9 0 0
LOS:B-
Lanes:0 0 5 0 1
Final Vol:0 1956 591***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1956 591 555 1989 0 453 3 435 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1956 591 555 1989 0 453 3 435 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1956 591 555 1989 0 453 3 435 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1956 591 555 1989 0 453 3 435 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1956 591 555 1989 0 453 3 435 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1956 591 555 1989 0 453 3 435 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.51 0.01 1.48 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2637 12 2602 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.21 0.34 0.18 0.35 0.00 0.17 0.26 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 57.5 57.5 30.0 87.5 0.0 43.5 43.5 43.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.50 0.82 0.82 0.56 0.00 0.55 0.82 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Del: 0.0 30.6 36.7 52.5 15.1 0.0 40.2 44.7 39.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.0 0.1 7.6 8.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 5.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.82 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 16.5 27.2 50.9 0.2 0.0 40.6 49.8 40.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 16.5 27.2 50.9 0.2 0.0 40.6 49.8 40.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A B C D A A D D D A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 8 22 12 0 0 11 20 10 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-15
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #8: Stevens Creek Blvd and De Anza Blvd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:193 518 303***
Lanes:0 1 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
215*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 179
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
335 3 Critical V/C:0.709 2 592***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):37.1 0
57 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):37.4 2 244
LOS:D+
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:454 1929***190
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 454 1929 190 303 518 193 215 335 57 244 592 179
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 454 1929 190 303 518 193 215 335 57 244 592 179
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 454 1929 190 303 518 193 215 335 57 244 592 179
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 454 1929 190 303 518 193 215 335 57 244 592 179
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 454 1929 190 303 518 193 215 335 57 244 592 179
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 454 1929 190 303 518 193 215 335 57 244 592 179
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.28 0.72
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 4298 1300
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.34 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.11 0.07 0.06 0.03 0.08 0.14 0.14
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 43.0 59.2 59.2 16.8 32.9 32.9 11.9 18.4 18.4 17.6 24.1 24.1
Volume/Cap: 0.42 0.71 0.23 0.71 0.34 0.42 0.71 0.40 0.22 0.54 0.71 0.71
Delay/Veh: 31.1 26.5 19.2 56.7 36.9 37.7 61.9 48.1 46.9 50.8 48.9 48.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 31.1 26.5 19.2 56.7 36.9 37.7 61.9 48.1 46.9 50.8 48.9 48.9
LOS by Move: C C B-E+ D+ D+ E D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 8 20 4 8 5 7 5 4 2 6 11 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-16
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #8: Stevens Creek Blvd and De Anza Blvd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:259 1812***487
Lanes:0 1 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
203 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 242
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
697 3 Critical V/C:0.861 2 566
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):45.8 0
417*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):43.1 2 352***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:508***938 300
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.48 0.52 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.07 0.93
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 6560 938 3150 5700 1750 3150 3921 1676
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.12 0.24 0.11 0.14 0.14
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 26.2 37.4 37.4 33.7 44.9 44.9 17.6 38.7 38.7 18.2 39.3 39.3
Volume/Cap: 0.86 0.62 0.64 0.64 0.86 0.86 0.51 0.44 0.86 0.86 0.51 0.51
Uniform Del: 55.1 45.0 45.4 47.7 44.6 44.6 57.2 41.7 48.1 59.7 42.3 42.3
IncremntDel: 12.3 0.8 3.0 1.9 3.4 3.4 1.2 0.2 14.6 16.8 0.3 0.3
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.85 0.76 0.76 0.79 0.69 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 59.0 34.8 37.4 39.5 34.0 34.0 58.4 41.9 62.7 76.5 42.6 42.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 59.0 34.8 37.4 39.5 34.0 34.0 58.4 41.9 62.7 76.5 42.6 42.6
LOS by Move: E+ C-D+ D C-C-E+ D E E-D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 15 11 12 11 22 22 5 7 19 11 9 9
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-17
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #9: De Anza Blvd and McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:60 498 49***
Lanes:0 1 3 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
226 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 36
1
Loss Time (sec):10
1
49 0 Critical V/C:0.643 0 75***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):23.8 0
215*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.0 2 33
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:436 2053***69
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 436 2053 69 49 498 60 226 49 215 33 75 36
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 436 2053 69 49 498 60 226 49 215 33 75 36
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 436 2053 69 49 498 60 226 49 215 33 75 36
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 436 2053 69 49 498 60 226 49 215 33 75 36
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 436 2053 69 49 498 60 226 49 215 33 75 36
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 436 2053 69 49 498 60 226 49 215 33 75 36
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.93 0.95 0.92 0.83 0.95 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.90 0.10 1.00 3.55 0.45 1.65 0.35 1.00 2.00 0.68 0.32
Final Sat.: 1750 5418 182 1750 6692 806 2917 633 1750 3150 1216 584
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.25 0.38 0.38 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.12 0.01 0.06 0.06
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 59.7 72.0 72.0 7.0 19.3 19.3 23.3 23.3 23.3 11.7 11.7 11.7
Volume/Cap: 0.52 0.65 0.65 0.50 0.48 0.48 0.41 0.41 0.65 0.11 0.65 0.65
Delay/Veh: 22.8 18.1 18.1 60.7 48.1 48.1 44.7 44.7 51.2 51.5 63.0 63.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 22.8 18.1 18.1 60.7 48.1 48.1 44.7 44.7 51.2 51.5 63.0 63.0
LOS by Move: C+ B-B-E D D D D D-D-E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 12 19 19 3 5 5 5 5 9 1 5 5
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-18
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #9: De Anza Blvd and McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:105 2001***140
Lanes:0 1 3 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
183 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 21
1
Loss Time (sec):9
1
111 0 Critical V/C:0.868 0 175***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):55.5 0
330*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):48.9 2 172
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:410***1039 73
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.93 0.95 0.92 0.83 0.95 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.80 0.20 1.00 3.79 0.21 1.26 0.74 1.00 2.00 0.89 0.11
Final Sat.: 1750 5232 368 1750 7125 374 2209 1340 1750 3150 1607 193
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.28 0.28 0.08 0.08 0.19 0.05 0.11 0.11
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 37.8 59.2 59.2 23.8 45.3 45.3 30.4 30.4 30.4 17.6 17.6 17.6
Volume/Cap: 0.87 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.87 0.87 0.38 0.38 0.87 0.44 0.87 0.87
Uniform Del: 48.7 29.1 29.1 52.4 44.6 44.6 46.8 46.8 52.9 56.6 60.1 60.1
IncremntDel: 15.7 0.1 0.1 1.2 3.6 3.6 0.3 0.3 18.7 0.8 28.2 28.2
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 64.4 29.2 29.2 53.5 48.2 48.2 47.1 47.1 71.6 57.4 88.2 88.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 64.4 29.2 29.2 53.5 48.2 48.2 47.1 47.1 71.6 57.4 88.2 88.2
LOS by Move: E C C D-D D D D E E+ F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 21 11 11 6 24 24 6 6 18 4 11 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-19
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #10: De Anza Blvd and Bollinger Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:105 555 323***
Lanes:0 1 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
111*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 414***
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
69 0 Critical V/C:0.819 1 115
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):41.1 0
14 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):39.3 1 170
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:47 1870***174
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 47 1870 174 323 555 105 111 69 14 170 115 414
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 47 1870 174 323 555 105 111 69 14 170 115 414
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 47 1870 174 323 555 105 111 69 14 170 115 414
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 47 1870 174 323 555 105 111 69 14 170 115 414
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 47 1870 174 323 555 105 111 69 14 170 115 414
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 47 1870 174 323 555 105 111 69 14 170 115 414
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.74 0.26 2.00 3.34 0.66 2.00 0.83 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 5123 477 3150 6305 1193 3150 1496 304 1750 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.37 0.37 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.06 0.24
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 27.2 54.4 54.4 15.3 42.5 42.5 7.0 19.2 19.2 23.1 35.3 35.3
Volume/Cap: 0.12 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.26 0.26 0.62 0.30 0.30 0.52 0.21 0.83
Delay/Veh: 38.9 33.3 33.3 67.2 29.4 29.4 64.0 47.1 47.1 47.0 34.0 52.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 38.9 33.3 33.3 67.2 29.4 29.4 64.0 47.1 47.1 47.0 34.0 52.9
LOS by Move: D+ C-C-E C C E D D D C-D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 24 24 10 4 4 4 3 3 7 3 18
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-20
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #10: De Anza Blvd and Bollinger Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:139 2147 552***
Lanes:0 1 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
123 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 263
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
124*** 0 Critical V/C:0.682 1 126
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):37.5 0
36 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):26.1 1 247***
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:47 1005***219
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 47 1005 219 552 2147 139 123 124 36 247 126 263
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 47 1005 219 552 2147 139 123 124 36 247 126 263
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 47 1005 219 552 2147 139 123 124 36 247 126 263
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 47 1005 219 552 2147 139 123 124 36 247 126 263
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 47 1005 219 552 2147 139 123 124 36 247 126 263
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 47 1005 219 552 2147 139 123 124 36 247 126 263
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.44 0.56 2.00 3.75 0.25 2.00 0.78 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 4597 1002 3150 7043 456 3150 1395 405 1750 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.22 0.22 0.18 0.30 0.30 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.14 0.07 0.15
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 11.4 44.9 44.9 36.0 69.4 69.4 11.8 18.2 18.2 29.0 35.4 35.4
Volume/Cap: 0.33 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.61 0.61 0.46 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.26 0.59
Uniform Del: 60.7 41.4 41.4 46.9 25.6 25.6 61.1 58.1 58.1 51.3 41.8 46.0
IncremntDel: 1.4 1.1 1.1 2.4 0.3 0.3 1.3 8.0 8.0 5.3 0.3 2.2
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.94 0.69 0.69 0.77 0.34 0.34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 58.5 29.5 29.5 38.5 9.1 9.1 62.4 66.1 66.1 56.5 42.1 48.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 58.5 29.5 29.5 38.5 9.1 9.1 62.4 66.1 66.1 56.5 42.1 48.2
LOS by Move: E+ C C D+ A A E E E E+ D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 13 13 12 9 9 4 8 8 12 4 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-21
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #11: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:262 711***0
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 820
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.719 1!15***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):40.2 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):30.9 1 130
LOS:C
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:693***1914 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 693 1914 0 0 711 262 0 0 0 130 15 820
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 693 1914 0 0 711 262 0 0 0 130 15 820
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 693 1914 0 0 711 262 0 0 0 130 15 820
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 693 1914 0 0 711 262 0 0 0 130 15 820
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 693 1914 0 0 711 262 0 0 0 130 15 820
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 693 1914 0 0 711 262 0 0 0 130 15 820
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.16 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 0.03 1.83
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 4090 1507 0 0 0 1988 55 3300
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.27 0.25
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 37.9 67.9 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.1 47.1 47.1
Volume/Cap: 0.72 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.72 0.65
Delay/Veh: 41.0 19.5 0.0 0.0 45.1 45.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.5 34.7 32.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.0 19.5 0.0 0.0 45.1 45.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.5 34.7 32.8
LOS by Move: D B-A A D D A A A C C-C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 14 16 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 3 18 15
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-22
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #11: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:233 2221***0
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 382
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.781 1!3***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):19.7 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):14.3 1 197
LOS:B
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:394***1011 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 394 1011 0 0 2221 233 0 0 0 197 3 478
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 394 1011 0 0 2221 233 0 0 0 197 3 478
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 394 1011 0 0 2221 233 0 0 0 197 3 478
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 394 1011 0 0 2221 233 0 0 0 197 3 382
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 394 1011 0 0 2221 233 0 0 0 197 3 382
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 394 1011 0 0 2221 233 0 0 0 197 3 382
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.70 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.34 0.01 1.65
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 5068 532 0 0 0 2339 18 2893
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.17 0.13
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 22.4 101 0.0 0.0 78.6 78.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 30.0
Volume/Cap: 0.78 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.78 0.62
Uniform Del: 56.4 6.6 0.0 0.0 24.0 24.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.2 51.9 49.8
IncremntDel: 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 5.3 1.2
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 56.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.8 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.4 57.2 51.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 56.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.8 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.4 57.2 51.0
LOS by Move: E+ A A A A A A A A D E+ D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 6 15 10
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-23
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #12: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 547 294***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
264*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 1! Critical V/C:0.702 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):23.6 0
207 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):20.5 0 0
LOS:C+
Lanes:0 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:0 2343***238
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 2343 238 294 547 0 264 0 207 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 2343 238 294 547 0 264 0 207 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 2343 238 294 547 0 264 0 207 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2343 238 294 547 0 264 0 207 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2343 238 294 547 0 264 0 207 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2343 238 294 547 0 264 0 207 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.71 0.29 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.56 0.00 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5083 516 3150 5700 0 2731 0 2519 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.46 0.46 0.09 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 81.4 81.4 16.5 97.9 0.0 17.1 0.0 17.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.12 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 14.2 14.2 56.7 3.0 0.0 54.4 0.0 51.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 14.2 14.2 56.7 3.0 0.0 54.4 0.0 51.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A B B E+ A A D-A D-A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 21 21 6 2 0 8 0 6 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-24
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #12: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1716 682***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
202 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
2*** 1! Critical V/C:0.720 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):34.2 0
546 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):20.5 0 0
LOS:C+
Lanes:0 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:0 1191***188
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1191 188 682 1716 0 202 2 546 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1191 188 682 1716 0 202 2 546 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1191 188 682 1716 0 202 2 546 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1191 188 682 1716 0 202 2 546 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1191 188 682 1716 0 202 2 546 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1191 188 682 1716 0 202 2 546 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.58 0.42 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.27 0.01 1.72 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 4836 763 3150 5700 0 2230 10 3097 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.22 0.30 0.00 0.09 0.21 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 47.9 47.9 42.1 90.0 0.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.47 0.00 0.31 0.72 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Del: 0.0 40.2 40.2 43.7 12.8 0.0 38.5 44.4 42.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.0 1.4 1.4 2.7 0.1 0.0 0.1 2.5 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.00 0.65 0.65 0.71 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 27.6 27.6 33.8 0.1 0.0 38.6 46.8 43.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 27.6 27.6 33.8 0.1 0.0 38.6 46.8 43.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A C C C-A A D+ D D A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 15 15 13 0 0 6 16 13 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-25
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #13: Homestead Road and Blaney Road/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:1 2***2
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Permit Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):62
0 1
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
559*** 1 Critical V/C:0.622 1 776
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):25.5 0
116 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):22.1 1 126***
LOS:C+
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:494***1 235
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Road/Driveway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 494 1 235 2 2 1 0 559 116 126 776 1
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 494 1 235 2 2 1 0 559 116 126 776 1
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 494 1 235 2 2 1 0 559 116 126 776 1
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 494 1 235 2 2 1 0 559 116 126 776 1
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 494 1 235 2 2 1 0 559 116 126 776 1
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 494 1 235 2 2 1 0 559 116 126 776 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.97 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 0.01 0.99 0.40 0.40 0.20 0.00 1.65 0.35 1.00 1.99 0.01
Final Sat.: 1800 8 1792 700 700 350 0 3064 636 1750 3695 5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.27 0.13 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.07 0.21 0.21
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 21.6 21.6 21.6 10.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 14.4 14.4 7.0 21.4 21.4
Volume/Cap: 0.79 0.38 0.38 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.79 0.79 0.64 0.61 0.61
Delay/Veh: 22.6 15.3 15.3 21.9 21.9 21.9 0.0 27.3 27.3 33.1 17.7 17.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 22.6 15.3 15.3 21.9 21.9 21.9 0.0 27.3 27.3 33.1 17.7 17.7
LOS by Move: C+ B B C+ C+ C+ A C C C-B B
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 4 4 0 0 0 0 7 7 3 6 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-26
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #13: Homestead Road and Blaney Road/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:3 1***0
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Permit Signal=Permit
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
1 0
Cycle Time (sec):80
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
953*** 1 Critical V/C:0.434 1 1052
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):13.6 0
245 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):11.8 1 216
LOS:B+
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:89 1***139
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Road/Driveway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 89 1 139 0 1 3 1 953 245 216 1052 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 89 1 139 0 1 3 1 953 245 216 1052 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 89 1 139 0 1 3 1 953 245 216 1052 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 89 1 139 0 1 3 1 953 245 216 1052 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 89 1 139 0 1 3 1 953 245 216 1052 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 89 1 139 0 1 3 1 953 245 216 1052 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.97 0.92
Lanes: 0.99 0.01 1.00 0.00 0.25 0.75 0.01 1.59 0.40 1.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1780 20 1800 0 450 1350 3 2861 736 1750 3700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.05 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.12 0.28 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 14.2 14.2 14.2 0.0 10.0 10.0 46.8 46.8 46.8 46.8 46.8 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.28 0.28 0.43 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.21 0.49 0.00
Uniform Del: 28.5 28.5 29.3 0.0 30.7 30.7 10.3 10.3 10.3 7.9 9.6 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 28.6 28.6 29.9 0.0 30.7 30.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 8.0 9.8 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 28.6 28.6 29.9 0.0 30.7 30.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 8.0 9.8 0.0
LOS by Move: C C C A C C B+ B+ B+ A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 2 4 0 0 0 9 9 9 3 7 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-27
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #14: El Camino Real and Wolfe Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:8 514 90***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
58 1
Cycle Time (sec):150
1 191
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
263 3 Critical V/C:0.653 3 685
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):44.9 0
229*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):45.2 2 421***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:325 1082***27
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road El Camino Real
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 325 1082 27 90 514 8 58 263 229 421 685 191
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 325 1082 27 90 514 8 58 263 229 421 685 191
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 325 1082 27 90 514 8 58 263 229 421 685 191
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 325 1082 27 90 514 8 58 263 229 421 685 191
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 325 1082 27 90 514 8 58 263 229 421 685 191
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 325 1082 27 90 514 8 58 263 229 421 685 191
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 1750 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.28 0.02 0.05 0.09 0.00 0.03 0.05 0.13 0.13 0.12 0.11
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 41.2 65.4 65.4 11.8 36.0 53.0 17.0 30.1 30.1 30.7 43.8 43.8
Volume/Cap: 0.38 0.65 0.04 0.65 0.38 0.01 0.29 0.23 0.65 0.65 0.41 0.37
Delay/Veh: 44.3 34.3 24.2 77.8 47.8 31.5 61.8 50.4 59.5 57.2 42.9 42.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 44.3 34.3 24.2 77.8 47.8 31.5 61.8 50.4 59.5 57.2 42.9 42.7
LOS by Move: D C-C E-D C E D E+ E+ D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 19 1 5 7 0 3 3 11 11 8 7
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-28
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #14: El Camino Real and Wolfe Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:106 1197***219
Lanes:1 0 3 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
87 1
Cycle Time (sec):150
1 127
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1072 3 Critical V/C:0.711 3 703
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):53.7 0
403*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):48.3 2 329***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:345***576 178
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road El Camino Real
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 345 576 178 219 1197 106 87 1072 403 329 703 127
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 345 576 178 219 1197 106 87 1072 403 329 703 127
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 345 576 178 219 1197 106 87 1072 403 329 703 127
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 345 576 178 219 1197 106 87 1072 403 329 703 127
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 345 576 178 219 1197 106 87 1072 403 329 703 127
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 345 576 178 219 1197 106 87 1072 403 329 703 127
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 1750 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.15 0.10 0.13 0.21 0.06 0.05 0.19 0.23 0.10 0.12 0.07
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.1 36.9 36.9 30.5 44.3 64.6 20.3 48.6 48.6 22.0 50.3 50.3
Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.62 0.41 0.62 0.71 0.14 0.37 0.58 0.71 0.71 0.37 0.22
Uniform Del: 60.3 50.2 47.5 54.4 47.1 25.9 59.0 42.2 44.6 61.0 37.8 35.7
IncremntDel: 4.9 1.2 0.6 3.2 1.4 0.1 1.0 0.5 4.2 5.1 0.1 0.2
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 65.2 51.5 48.1 57.7 48.6 26.0 60.0 42.7 48.8 66.1 37.9 35.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 65.2 51.5 48.1 57.7 48.6 26.0 60.0 42.7 48.8 66.1 37.9 35.9
LOS by Move: E D-D E+ D C E+ D D E D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 11 7 11 17 3 4 14 18 10 8 4
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-29
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #15: Wolfe Road and Fremont Ave (SUN)
Signal=Perm+Prot/Rights=Include
Final Vol:403 746***15
Lanes:0 1 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
370*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):150
0 51
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
234 2 Critical V/C:0.539 0 25***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):39.4 0
162 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):43.2 1 11
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:186***1013 48
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Fremont Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 186 1013 48 15 746 403 370 234 162 11 25 51
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 186 1013 48 15 746 403 370 234 162 11 25 51
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 186 1013 48 15 746 403 370 234 162 11 25 51
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 186 1013 48 15 746 403 370 234 162 11 25 51
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 186 1013 48 15 746 403 370 234 162 11 25 51
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 186 1013 48 15 746 403 370 234 162 11 25 51
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.86 0.14 0.04 1.96 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.67
Final Sat.: 1750 5346 253 73 3629 1800 3150 3800 1750 1750 592 1208
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.21 0.22 0.12 0.06 0.09 0.01 0.04 0.04
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 31.6 47.1 47.1 54.1 66.6 66.6 29.2 26.4 26.4 13.3 10.5 10.5
Volume/Cap: 0.50 0.60 0.60 0.57 0.46 0.50 0.60 0.35 0.53 0.07 0.60 0.60
Delay/Veh: 53.4 44.1 44.1 38.9 29.3 30.0 56.8 54.6 57.8 62.9 75.7 75.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 53.4 44.1 44.1 38.9 29.3 30.0 56.8 54.6 57.8 62.9 75.7 75.7
LOS by Move: D-D D D+ C C E+ D-E+ E E-E-
HCM2kAvgQ: 8 13 13 14 12 13 10 5 8 1 5 5
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-30
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #15: Wolfe Road and Fremont Ave (SUN)
Signal=Perm+Prot/Rights=Include
Final Vol:544 1496***58
Lanes:0 1 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
299 2
Cycle Time (sec):150
0 24
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
317 2 Critical V/C:0.743 0 25
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):34.7 0
258*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):44.5 1 4***
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:189***829 56
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Fremont Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 189 829 56 58 1496 544 299 317 258 4 25 24
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 189 829 56 58 1496 544 299 317 258 4 25 24
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 189 829 56 58 1496 544 299 317 258 4 25 24
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 189 829 56 58 1496 544 299 317 258 4 25 24
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 189 829 56 58 1496 544 299 317 258 4 25 24
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 189 829 56 58 1496 544 299 317 258 4 25 24
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.80 0.20 0.08 2.13 0.79 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.51 0.49
Final Sat.: 1750 5245 354 152 3921 1426 3150 3800 1750 1750 918 882
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.09 0.08 0.15 0.00 0.03 0.03
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 22.7 30.1 30.1 75.7 80.2 80.2 20.6 28.1 28.1 7.0 14.5 14.5
Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.79 0.79 0.76 0.71 0.71 0.69 0.45 0.79 0.05 0.28 0.28
Uniform Del: 60.6 56.9 56.9 29.7 26.3 26.3 61.6 54.0 58.1 68.3 62.9 62.9
IncremntDel: 8.9 3.8 3.8 1.2 0.8 0.8 4.7 0.4 11.9 0.2 0.9 0.9
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 69.4 60.6 60.6 30.9 27.1 27.1 66.3 54.5 70.0 68.6 63.8 63.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 69.4 60.6 60.6 30.9 27.1 27.1 66.3 54.5 70.0 68.6 63.8 63.8
LOS by Move: E E E C C C E D-E E E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 13 13 26 24 24 9 7 14 0 2 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 10:36:14 2014 Page 9-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #18: Wolfe Road and Homestead Road (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:117 774 141***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
126*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
0 109
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
463 2 Critical V/C:0.573 1 545***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):33.1 0
181 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):32.8 2 257
LOS:C-
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:264 826***193
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 264 826 193 141 774 117 126 463 181 257 545 109
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 264 826 193 141 774 117 126 463 181 257 545 109
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 264 826 193 141 774 117 126 463 181 257 545 109
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 264 826 193 141 774 117 126 463 181 257 545 109
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 264 826 193 141 774 117 126 463 181 257 545 109
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 264 826 193 141 774 117 126 463 181 257 545 109
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.98 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.59 0.41 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.66 0.34
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 3150 4864 735 1750 3800 1750 3150 3083 617
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.22 0.11 0.04 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.18 0.18
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 17.3 41.7 60.8 8.6 32.9 32.9 13.8 28.6 45.9 19.1 33.9 33.9
Volume/Cap: 0.53 0.57 0.20 0.57 0.53 0.53 0.57 0.47 0.25 0.47 0.57 0.57
Delay/Veh: 43.7 27.7 12.5 52.2 32.4 32.4 49.0 34.7 21.0 41.5 32.7 32.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 43.7 27.7 12.5 52.2 32.4 32.4 49.0 34.7 21.0 41.5 32.7 32.7
LOS by Move: D C B D-C-C-D C-C+ D C-C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 11 3 3 8 8 4 6 4 5 10 10
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 10:36:14 2014 Page 9-2
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #18: Wolfe Road and Homestead Road (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:121 1113***159
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
201*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
0 108
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
713 2 Critical V/C:0.758 1 773***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):40.8 0
251 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):38.0 2 444
LOS:D+
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:322***758 189
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 322 758 189 159 1113 121 201 713 251 444 773 108
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 322 758 189 159 1113 121 201 713 251 444 773 108
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 322 758 189 159 1113 121 201 713 251 444 773 108
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 322 758 189 159 1113 121 201 713 251 444 773 108
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 322 758 189 159 1113 121 201 713 251 444 773 108
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 322 758 189 159 1113 121 201 713 251 444 773 108
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.98 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.69 0.31 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.75 0.25
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 3150 5050 549 1750 3800 1750 3150 3246 454
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.20 0.11 0.05 0.22 0.22 0.11 0.19 0.14 0.14 0.24 0.24
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 14.8 35.5 57.4 11.3 32.0 32.0 16.7 29.2 44.1 22.0 34.5 34.5
Volume/Cap: 0.76 0.62 0.21 0.49 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.71 0.36 0.71 0.76 0.76
Uniform Del: 45.9 31.5 14.1 46.6 35.5 35.5 44.7 36.5 23.1 41.0 34.0 34.0
IncremntDel: 7.7 1.0 0.1 1.2 2.1 2.1 11.9 2.3 0.3 3.7 2.9 2.9
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 53.6 32.5 14.2 47.8 37.6 37.6 56.7 38.8 23.4 44.7 36.9 36.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 53.6 32.5 14.2 47.8 37.6 37.6 56.7 38.8 23.4 44.7 36.9 36.9
LOS by Move: D-C-B D D+ D+ E+ D+ C D D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 11 4 3 13 13 7 11 6 10 15 15
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-33
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #19: Wolfe Road and Apple Campus 2 Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 1212 0***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):110
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):0
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.314 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):0.0 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):0.0 0 0
LOS:A
Lanes:0 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:0 1790***0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Apple Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1790 0 0 1212 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1790 0 0 1212 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1790 0 0 1212 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1790 0 0 1212 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1790 0 0 1212 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1790 0 0 1212 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 0 0 5700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 110 0.0 0.0 110 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-34
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #19: Wolfe Road and Apple Campus 2 Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 1808***0
Lanes:0 0 3 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):0
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.317 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):0.0 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):0.0 0 0
LOS:A
Lanes:0 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:0***1371 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road Apple Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 10 10 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1371 0 0 1808 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1371 0 0 1808 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1371 0 0 1808 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 0 1371 0 0 1808 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1371 0 0 1808 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 0 1371 0 0 1808 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 0 0 5700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 120 0.0 0.0 120 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-35
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #20: Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:24 1219 108***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
40 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
1 139
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
18*** 0 Critical V/C:0.661 1 15
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):22.7 0
104 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):22.3 2 158***
LOS:C+
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:108 1555***0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 108 1555 502 108 1219 24 40 18 104 158 15 139
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 108 1555 502 108 1219 24 40 18 104 158 15 139
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 108 1555 502 108 1219 24 40 18 104 158 15 139
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 108 1555 0 108 1219 24 40 18 104 158 15 139
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 108 1555 0 108 1219 24 40 18 104 158 15 139
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 108 1555 0 108 1219 24 40 18 104 158 15 139
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.94 0.06 1.00 0.15 0.85 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 1750 5492 108 1750 266 1534 3150 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.41 0.00 0.06 0.22 0.22 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.01 0.08
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 17.5 68.1 0.0 10.3 60.9 60.9 8.1 11.3 11.3 8.3 11.5 11.5
Volume/Cap: 0.22 0.66 0.00 0.66 0.40 0.40 0.31 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.08 0.76
Delay/Veh: 40.5 14.2 0.0 57.8 14.2 14.2 49.7 56.1 56.1 56.2 44.6 64.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 40.5 14.2 0.0 57.8 14.2 14.2 49.7 56.1 56.1 56.2 44.6 64.3
LOS by Move: D B A E+ B B D E+ E+ E+ D E
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 16 0 5 8 8 2 5 5 3 0 5
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-36
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #20: Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:58 1565 114***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
32 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 166
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
13*** 0 Critical V/C:0.673 1 49
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):35.4 0
110 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):33.6 2 516***
LOS:C-
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:236 1173***0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 236 1173 217 114 1565 58 32 13 110 516 49 166
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 236 1173 217 114 1565 58 32 13 110 516 49 166
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 236 1173 217 114 1565 58 32 13 110 516 49 166
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 236 1173 0 114 1565 58 32 13 110 516 49 166
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 236 1173 0 114 1565 58 32 13 110 516 49 166
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 236 1173 0 114 1565 58 32 13 110 516 49 166
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.89 0.11 1.00 0.11 0.89 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 1750 5400 200 1750 190 1610 3150 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.31 0.00 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.16 0.03 0.09
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 13.7 55.0 0.0 11.6 52.9 52.9 15.8 12.2 12.2 29.2 25.6 25.6
Volume/Cap: 0.66 0.67 0.00 0.67 0.66 0.66 0.14 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.12 0.44
Uniform Del: 50.9 25.5 0.0 52.4 26.4 26.4 46.1 52.0 52.0 41.1 38.1 41.0
IncremntDel: 4.4 1.1 0.0 10.2 0.7 0.7 0.3 9.5 9.5 2.4 0.1 0.8
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 55.3 26.5 0.0 62.6 27.0 27.0 46.4 61.5 61.5 43.5 38.2 41.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 55.3 26.5 0.0 62.6 27.0 27.0 46.4 61.5 61.5 43.5 38.2 41.8
LOS by Move: E+ C A E C C D E E D D+ D
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 17 0 6 16 16 1 6 6 10 1 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-37
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #21: Wolfe Road and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1016 0
Lanes:1 0 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):55
1 664***
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.761 1!0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):15.2 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):12.8 1 371
LOS:B
Lanes:0 0 2 0 0
Final Vol:0 1501***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1501 0 0 1016 0 0 0 0 371 0 664
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1501 0 0 1016 0 0 0 0 371 0 664
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1501 0 0 1016 0 0 0 0 371 0 664
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.97 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.36 0.00 1.64
Final Sat.: 0 3700 0 0 3800 1750 0 0 0 2377 0 2873
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.23
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 29.3 0.0 0.0 29.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 16.7
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.76
Delay/Veh: 0.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 8.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.0 0.0 19.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 8.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.0 0.0 19.9
LOS by Move: A B+ A A A A A A A B A B-
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 10 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 9
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-38
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #21: Wolfe Road and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1533***0
Lanes:1 0 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):55
1 545
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.739 1!0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):14.6 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):12.7 1 566***
LOS:B
Lanes:0 0 2 0 0
Final Vol:0 1003 0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1003 0 0 1533 0 0 0 0 566 0 545
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1003 0 0 1533 0 0 0 0 566 0 545
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1003 0 0 1533 0 0 0 0 566 0 545
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1003 0 0 1533 0 0 0 0 566 0 545
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1003 0 0 1533 0 0 0 0 566 0 545
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1003 0 0 1533 0 0 0 0 566 0 545
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.51 0.00 1.49
Final Sat.: 0 3800 0 0 3800 1750 0 0 0 2642 0 2608
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.21
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.0 0.0 16.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.72
Uniform Del: 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.6 0.0 17.5
IncremntDel: 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.7
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 7.9 0.0 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.6 0.0 19.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 7.9 0.0 0.0 10.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.6 0.0 19.2
LOS by Move: A A A A B+ A A A A B-A B-
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 5 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 8 0 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-39
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #22: Wolfe Road and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 913 0
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
719*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):55
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.605 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):13.0 0
322 2 Avg Delay (sec/veh):11.9 0 0
LOS:B+
Lanes:0 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:0 1055***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1055 433 0 913 474 719 0 322 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1055 433 0 913 474 719 0 322 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1055 433 0 913 474 719 0 322 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1055 0 0 913 0 719 0 322 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1055 0 0 913 0 719 0 322 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1055 0 0 913 0 719 0 322 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 1750 0 5700 1750 3150 0 3150 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 25.2 0.0 0.0 25.2 0.0 20.8 0.0 20.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 11.8 0.0 0.0 9.7 0.0 14.7 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 11.8 0.0 0.0 9.7 0.0 14.7 0.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A B+ A A A A B A B+ A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 7 0 0 3 0 7 0 2 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-40
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #22: Wolfe Road and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1524 0
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
330*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):55
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.453 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):9.1 0
292 2 Avg Delay (sec/veh):8.4 0 0
LOS:A
Lanes:0 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:0 1041***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1041 0 0 1524 0 330 0 292 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1041 0 0 1524 0 330 0 292 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1041 0 0 1524 0 330 0 292 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1041 0 0 1524 0 330 0 292 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1041 0 0 1524 0 330 0 292 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1041 0 0 1524 0 330 0 292 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 1750 0 5700 1750 3150 0 3150 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 12.7 0.0 12.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Del: 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 18.1 0.0 17.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 6.1 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 18.6 0.0 18.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 6.1 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 18.6 0.0 18.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A A A A B-A B-A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 5 0 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-41
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #23: Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 843 235***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
2*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
1 82***
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1 1 Critical V/C:0.442 1 3
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):19.3 0
2 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):18.5 2 27
LOS:B-
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:9 1389***130
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Vallco Parkway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 9 1389 130 235 843 18 2 1 2 27 3 82
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 9 1389 130 235 843 18 2 1 2 27 3 82
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 9 1389 130 235 843 18 2 1 2 27 3 82
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 9 1389 130 235 843 0 2 1 2 27 3 82
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 9 1389 130 235 843 0 2 1 2 27 3 82
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 9 1389 130 235 843 0 2 1 2 27 3 82
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.73 0.27 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 5120 479 3150 5700 1750 1750 1900 1750 3150 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.27 0.27 0.07 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.05
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 24.1 62.9 62.9 17.3 56.0 0.0 7.0 10.5 10.5 7.4 10.9 10.9
Volume/Cap: 0.02 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.29 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.13 0.02 0.47
Delay/Veh: 33.7 14.0 14.0 42.9 15.6 0.0 48.3 45.0 45.1 48.6 44.8 48.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 33.7 14.0 14.0 42.9 15.6 0.0 48.3 45.0 45.1 48.6 44.8 48.9
LOS by Move: C-B B D B A D D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 10 10 4 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 3
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-42
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #23: Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1183***219
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
55*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 454***
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
15 1 Critical V/C:0.580 1 13
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):32.7 0
15 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):35.9 2 209
LOS:D+
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:42***930 74
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Vallco Parkway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 42 930 74 219 1183 52 55 15 15 209 13 454
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 42 930 74 219 1183 52 55 15 15 209 13 454
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 42 930 74 219 1183 52 55 15 15 209 13 454
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 42 930 74 219 1183 0 55 15 15 209 13 454
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 42 930 74 219 1183 0 55 15 15 209 13 454
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 42 930 74 219 1183 0 55 15 15 209 13 454
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.77 0.23 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 5187 413 3150 5700 1750 1750 1900 1750 3150 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.18 0.18 0.07 0.21 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.01 0.26
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 7.0 35.1 35.1 13.6 41.8 0.0 7.0 33.0 33.0 26.3 52.2 52.2
Volume/Cap: 0.41 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.60 0.00 0.54 0.03 0.03 0.30 0.02 0.60
Uniform Del: 54.5 36.6 36.6 50.7 32.2 0.0 54.9 31.8 31.8 39.2 19.3 25.8
IncremntDel: 2.7 0.7 0.7 3.1 0.5 0.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.3
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 57.2 37.2 37.2 53.8 32.7 0.0 60.6 31.8 31.9 39.5 19.3 27.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 57.2 37.2 37.2 53.8 32.7 0.0 60.6 31.8 31.9 39.5 19.3 27.1
LOS by Move: E+ D+ D+ D-C-A E C C D B-C
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 11 11 5 12 0 3 0 0 4 0 14
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-43
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #24: Stevens Creek Blvd and Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 270 184***
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
418*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 99
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
515 3 Critical V/C:0.632 2 778***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):41.7 0
74 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):40.3 2 44
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:160 875***101
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 160 875 101 184 270 468 418 515 74 44 778 99
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 160 875 101 184 270 468 418 515 74 44 778 99
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 160 875 101 184 270 468 418 515 74 44 778 99
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 160 875 101 184 270 0 418 515 74 44 778 99
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 160 875 101 184 270 0 418 515 74 44 778 99
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 160 875 101 184 270 0 418 515 74 44 778 99
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.68 0.32 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.65 0.35
Final Sat.: 1750 5020 579 1750 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 4967 632
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.07 0.00 0.13 0.09 0.04 0.01 0.16 0.16
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 27.8 33.1 33.1 20.0 25.3 0.0 25.2 33.4 33.4 21.6 29.7 29.7
Volume/Cap: 0.40 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.34 0.00 0.63 0.32 0.15 0.08 0.63 0.63
Delay/Veh: 39.7 39.0 39.0 51.1 40.5 0.0 45.2 34.5 32.8 41.0 41.2 41.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 39.7 39.0 39.0 51.1 40.5 0.0 45.2 34.5 32.8 41.0 41.2 41.2
LOS by Move: D D+ D+ D-D A D C-C-D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 11 11 7 4 0 8 5 2 1 10 10
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-44
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #24: Stevens Creek Blvd and Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 809***280
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
558*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 158
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1071 3 Critical V/C:0.714 2 685***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):44.4 0
237 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):40.9 2 195
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:178***314 93
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 178 314 93 280 809 549 558 1071 237 195 685 158
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 178 314 93 280 809 549 558 1071 237 195 685 158
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 178 314 93 280 809 549 558 1071 237 195 685 158
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 178 314 93 280 809 0 558 1071 237 195 685 158
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 178 314 93 280 809 0 558 1071 237 195 685 158
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 178 314 93 280 809 0 558 1071 237 195 685 158
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.29 0.71 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.42 0.58
Final Sat.: 1750 4319 1279 1750 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 4549 1049
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.07 0.07 0.16 0.21 0.00 0.18 0.19 0.14 0.06 0.15 0.15
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 17.1 18.1 18.1 34.8 35.8 0.0 29.8 41.4 41.4 13.7 25.3 25.3
Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.48 0.48 0.55 0.71 0.00 0.71 0.54 0.39 0.54 0.71 0.71
Uniform Del: 49.1 46.6 46.6 36.0 37.5 0.0 41.2 31.7 29.7 50.2 44.0 44.0
IncremntDel: 9.4 0.4 0.4 1.3 2.2 0.0 3.1 0.3 0.4 1.7 2.1 2.1
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 58.5 47.1 47.1 37.3 39.7 0.0 44.3 32.0 30.2 52.0 46.1 46.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 58.5 47.1 47.1 37.3 39.7 0.0 44.3 32.0 30.2 52.0 46.1 46.1
LOS by Move: E+ D D D+ D A D C C D-D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 8 5 5 9 13 0 11 10 7 4 10 10
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-45
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #25: Miller Ave and Bollinger Road (SJ)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:155 236***145
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
240*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 225
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
573 1 Critical V/C:0.702 1 519***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):45.5 0
73 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):40.7 1 67
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:138***627 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Miller Av Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 138 627 250 145 236 155 240 573 73 67 519 225
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 138 627 250 145 236 155 240 573 73 67 519 225
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 138 627 250 145 236 155 240 573 73 67 519 225
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 138 627 0 145 236 155 240 573 73 67 519 225
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 138 627 0 145 236 155 240 573 73 67 519 225
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 138 627 0 145 236 155 240 573 73 67 519 225
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.60 0.40 1.00 1.77 0.23 1.00 1.38 0.62
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 3150 1086 714 1750 3282 418 1750 2580 1119
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.17 0.00 0.05 0.22 0.22 0.14 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.20 0.20
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 13.9 38.9 0.0 13.3 38.4 38.4 24.2 45.1 45.1 14.6 35.5 35.5
Volume/Cap: 0.70 0.53 0.00 0.43 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.48 0.48 0.33 0.70 0.70
Delay/Veh: 63.9 35.4 0.0 52.6 41.8 41.8 53.0 30.7 30.7 51.1 41.7 41.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 63.9 35.4 0.0 52.6 41.8 41.8 53.0 30.7 30.7 51.1 41.7 41.7
LOS by Move: E D+ A D-D D D-C C D-D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 10 0 4 15 15 10 10 10 3 14 14
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-46
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #25: Miller Ave and Bollinger Road (SJ)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:128 466***285
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
95 1
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 85
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
793*** 1 Critical V/C:0.819 1 611
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):41.3 0
121 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):37.8 1 131***
LOS:D+
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:121***244 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Miller Av Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 121 244 106 285 466 128 95 793 121 131 611 85
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 121 244 106 285 466 128 95 793 121 131 611 85
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 121 244 106 285 466 128 95 793 121 131 611 85
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 121 244 0 285 466 128 95 793 121 131 611 85
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 121 244 0 285 466 128 95 793 121 131 611 85
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 121 244 0 285 466 128 95 793 121 131 611 85
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.78 0.22 1.00 1.73 0.27 1.00 1.75 0.25
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 3150 1412 388 1750 3210 490 1750 3248 452
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.06 0.00 0.09 0.33 0.33 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.07 0.19 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 8.4 25.6 0.0 23.1 40.3 40.3 10.7 30.2 30.2 9.1 28.6 28.6
Volume/Cap: 0.82 0.25 0.00 0.39 0.82 0.82 0.51 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.66 0.66
Uniform Del: 45.0 29.6 0.0 32.5 26.6 26.6 42.2 32.4 32.4 44.6 31.4 31.4
IncremntDel: 29.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 7.3 7.3 2.3 4.9 4.9 27.2 1.5 1.5
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 74.0 29.7 0.0 32.8 34.0 34.0 44.5 37.3 37.3 71.8 32.9 32.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 74.0 29.7 0.0 32.8 34.0 34.0 44.5 37.3 37.3 71.8 32.9 32.9
LOS by Move: E C A C-C-C-D D+ D+ E C-C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 3 0 5 19 19 4 16 16 7 11 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-47
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #26: Stevens Creek Blvd and Finch Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:6 0 4***
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
20*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 10
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
587 2 Critical V/C:0.268 2 864***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):20.1 0
126 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):24.9 1 117
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:127***0 116
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Finch Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 127 0 116 4 0 6 20 587 126 117 864 10
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 127 0 116 4 0 6 20 587 126 117 864 10
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 127 0 116 4 0 6 20 587 126 117 864 10
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 127 0 116 4 0 6 20 587 126 117 864 10
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 127 0 116 4 0 6 20 587 126 117 864 10
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 127 0 116 4 0 6 20 587 126 117 864 10
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.45 0.55 1.00 2.96 0.04
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 3150 0 1750 1750 4609 989 1750 5536 64
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.13 0.13 0.07 0.16 0.16
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 28.9 0.0 28.9 10.0 0.0 10.0 7.0 45.3 45.3 23.8 62.1 62.1
Volume/Cap: 0.30 0.00 0.28 0.02 0.00 0.04 0.20 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.30 0.30
Delay/Veh: 37.7 0.0 37.4 50.5 0.0 50.7 54.8 26.7 26.7 41.9 16.6 16.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 37.7 0.0 37.4 50.5 0.0 50.7 54.8 26.7 26.7 41.9 16.6 16.6
LOS by Move: D+ A D+ D A D D-C C D B B
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 0 4 0 0 0 1 6 6 4 6 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-48
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #26: Stevens Creek Blvd and Finch Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:40 0 32***
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
26 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 6
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1155*** 2 Critical V/C:0.424 2 945
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):25.4 0
89 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):24.7 1 110***
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:152***0 64
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Finch Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 152 0 64 32 0 40 26 1155 89 110 945 6
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 152 0 64 32 0 40 26 1155 89 110 945 6
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 152 0 64 32 0 40 26 1155 89 110 945 6
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 152 0 64 32 0 40 26 1155 89 110 945 6
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 152 0 64 32 0 40 26 1155 89 110 945 6
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 152 0 64 32 0 40 26 1155 89 110 945 6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.78 0.22 1.00 2.98 0.02
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 3150 0 1750 1750 5199 401 1750 5565 35
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.00 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.22 0.06 0.17 0.17
Crit Moves: ******** **** ****
Green Time: 22.9 0.0 22.9 10.0 0.0 10.0 19.2 58.5 58.5 16.6 55.9 55.9
Volume/Cap: 0.46 0.00 0.19 0.12 0.00 0.27 0.09 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.36 0.36
Uniform Del: 43.0 0.0 40.8 50.9 0.0 51.6 43.0 20.2 20.2 47.6 20.6 20.6
IncremntDel: 1.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.4 0.1 0.1
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 44.0 0.0 41.1 51.1 0.0 52.6 43.1 20.4 20.4 48.9 20.7 20.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 44.0 0.0 41.1 51.1 0.0 52.6 43.1 20.4 20.4 48.9 20.7 20.7
LOS by Move: D A D D-A D-D C+ C+ D C+ C+
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 0 2 1 0 2 1 10 10 4 7 7
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-49
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #27: Homestead Road and Tantau Avenue/Quail Av ((CUP/SUN)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:92 95 96***
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
49 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 51
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
549*** 1 Critical V/C:0.581 1 782
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):39.4 0
194 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):35.7 1 178***
LOS:D+
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol:41 68***64
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue/Quail Ave Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 41 68 64 96 95 92 49 549 194 178 782 51
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 41 68 64 96 95 92 49 549 194 178 782 51
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 41 68 64 96 95 92 49 549 194 178 782 51
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 41 68 64 96 95 92 49 549 194 178 782 51
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 41 68 64 96 95 92 49 549 194 178 782 51
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 41 68 64 96 95 92 49 549 194 178 782 51
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95
Lanes: 0.38 0.62 1.00 0.34 0.34 0.32 1.00 1.46 0.54 1.00 1.87 0.13
Final Sat.: 677 1123 1750 594 587 569 1750 2733 966 1750 3473 227
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.23 0.23
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 12.9 12.9 12.9 34.5 34.5 34.5 12.9 42.9 42.9 21.7 51.6 51.6
Volume/Cap: 0.58 0.58 0.35 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.27 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.54 0.54
Delay/Veh: 57.5 57.5 52.8 40.3 40.3 40.3 52.0 33.9 33.9 49.8 27.7 27.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 57.5 57.5 52.8 40.3 40.3 40.3 52.0 33.9 33.9 49.8 27.7 27.7
LOS by Move: E+ E+ D-D D D D-C-C-D C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 4 2 10 10 10 2 12 12 7 12 12
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-50
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #27: Homestead Road and Tantau Avenue/Quail Av ((CUP/SUN)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:75 107***41
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
50 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 18
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
805*** 1 Critical V/C:0.613 1 904
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):36.6 0
118 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):34.2 1 133***
LOS:C-
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol:98 80***173
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue/Quail Ave Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 98 80 173 41 107 75 50 805 118 133 904 18
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 98 80 173 41 107 75 50 805 118 133 904 18
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 98 80 173 41 107 75 50 805 118 133 904 18
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 98 80 173 41 107 75 50 805 118 133 904 18
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 98 80 173 41 107 75 50 805 118 133 904 18
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 98 80 173 41 107 75 50 805 118 133 904 18
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.97 0.95
Lanes: 0.55 0.45 1.00 0.18 0.48 0.34 1.00 1.74 0.26 1.00 1.96 0.04
Final Sat.: 991 809 1750 322 840 589 1750 3227 473 1750 3628 72
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.03 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.25 0.25
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.4 19.4 19.4 24.9 24.9 24.9 12.1 48.8 48.8 14.9 51.6 51.6
Volume/Cap: 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.28 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.58 0.58
Uniform Del: 46.8 46.8 46.8 43.1 43.1 43.1 50.0 28.1 28.1 49.8 25.9 25.9
IncremntDel: 3.9 3.9 4.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 0.9 0.8 0.8 5.1 0.5 0.5
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 50.7 50.7 50.8 46.2 46.2 46.2 50.8 28.9 28.9 55.0 26.5 26.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 50.7 50.7 50.8 46.2 46.2 46.2 50.8 28.9 28.9 55.0 26.5 26.5
LOS by Move: D D D D D D D C C D-C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 6 6 9 9 9 2 14 14 6 13 13
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-51
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #28: Tantau Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:39 141 36***
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
213*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 168
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
88 1 Critical V/C:0.466 1 188***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):38.3 0
91 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):38.5 1 151
LOS:D+
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:31 253***76
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 31 253 76 36 141 39 213 88 91 151 188 168
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 31 253 76 36 141 39 213 88 91 151 188 168
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 31 253 76 36 141 39 213 88 91 151 188 168
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 31 253 76 36 141 39 213 88 91 151 188 168
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 31 253 76 36 141 39 213 88 91 151 188 168
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 31 253 76 36 141 39 213 88 91 151 188 168
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 0.77 0.23 1.00 0.78 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.03 0.97
Final Sat.: 1750 1384 416 1750 1410 390 1750 1900 1750 1750 1953 1745
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.18 0.18 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.05 0.05 0.09 0.10 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.8 47.9 47.9 7.0 35.1 35.1 31.9 27.6 27.6 29.5 25.2 25.2
Volume/Cap: 0.11 0.47 0.47 0.36 0.35 0.35 0.47 0.21 0.23 0.36 0.47 0.47
Delay/Veh: 44.7 29.1 29.1 58.6 35.8 35.8 39.7 39.4 39.7 39.9 44.0 44.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 44.7 29.1 29.1 58.6 35.8 35.8 39.7 39.4 39.7 39.9 44.0 44.0
LOS by Move: D C C E+ D+ D+ D D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 10 10 1 5 5 7 3 3 5 6 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-52
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #28: Tantau Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:156 304***162
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
47 1
Cycle Time (sec):60
0 57
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
263*** 1 Critical V/C:0.521 1 126
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):20.4 0
74 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):20.6 1 82***
LOS:C+
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:41***172 193
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 41 172 193 162 304 156 47 263 74 82 126 57
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 41 172 193 162 304 156 47 263 74 82 126 57
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 41 172 193 162 304 156 47 263 74 82 126 57
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 41 172 193 162 304 156 47 263 74 82 126 57
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 41 172 193 162 304 156 47 263 74 82 126 57
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 41 172 193 162 304 156 47 263 74 82 126 57
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 0.47 0.53 1.00 0.66 0.34 1.00 1.55 0.45 1.00 1.36 0.64
Final Sat.: 1750 848 952 1750 1190 610 1750 2887 812 1750 2547 1152
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.20 0.20 0.09 0.26 0.26 0.03 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.05
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 7.0 19.7 19.7 11.3 24.0 24.0 7.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.20 0.62 0.62 0.49 0.64 0.64 0.23 0.55 0.55 0.40 0.30 0.30
Uniform Del: 24.0 17.0 17.0 21.8 14.5 14.5 24.1 22.9 22.9 24.6 21.9 21.9
IncremntDel: 0.5 2.0 2.0 1.1 1.9 1.9 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.3 0.3 0.3
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 24.5 19.0 19.0 22.9 16.4 16.4 24.6 24.0 24.0 25.9 22.2 22.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 24.5 19.0 19.0 22.9 16.4 16.4 24.6 24.0 24.0 25.9 22.2 22.2
LOS by Move: C B-B-C+ B B C C C C C+ C+
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 6 6 3 7 7 1 3 3 2 2 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-53
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #31: Tantau Avenue and Vallco Parkway/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:203 234 1***
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
121*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 1
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
13 1 Critical V/C:0.407 1!1
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):20.1 0
19 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):24.1 0 2***
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:136 522***10
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Vallco Parkway/Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 136 522 10 1 234 203 121 13 19 2 1 1
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 136 522 10 1 234 203 121 13 19 2 1 1
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 136 522 10 1 234 203 121 13 19 2 1 1
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 136 522 10 1 234 203 121 13 19 2 1 1
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 136 522 10 1 234 203 121 13 19 2 1 1
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 136 522 10 1 234 203 121 13 19 2 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.98 0.02 1.00 1.05 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 0.25 0.25
Final Sat.: 1750 1766 34 1750 1980 1718 1750 1900 1750 875 438 438
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.07 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 33.3 77.0 77.0 7.0 50.7 50.7 18.0 18.0 18.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.29 0.48 0.48 0.01 0.29 0.29 0.48 0.05 0.07 0.03 0.03 0.03
Delay/Veh: 36.3 13.0 13.0 55.3 24.7 24.7 50.1 45.7 45.9 52.6 52.6 52.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 36.3 13.0 13.0 55.3 24.7 24.7 50.1 45.7 45.9 52.6 52.6 52.6
LOS by Move: D+ B B E+ C C D D D D-D-D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 11 11 0 5 5 5 0 1 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-54
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #31: Tantau Avenue and Vallco Parkway/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:190 485***1
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
178*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 2
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
0 1 Critical V/C:0.372 1!26
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):26.5 0
148 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):27.8 0 12***
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:49***181 1
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Vallco Parkway/Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 49 181 1 1 485 190 178 0 148 12 26 2
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 49 181 1 1 485 190 178 0 148 12 26 2
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 49 181 1 1 485 190 178 0 148 12 26 2
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 49 181 1 1 485 190 178 0 148 12 26 2
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 49 181 1 1 485 190 178 0 148 12 26 2
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 49 181 1 1 485 190 178 0 148 12 26 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.99 0.01 1.00 1.42 0.58 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.65 0.05
Final Sat.: 1750 1790 10 1750 2658 1041 1750 1900 1750 525 1138 88
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.10 0.00 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.02
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 8.8 41.9 41.9 24.2 57.3 57.3 31.9 0.0 31.9 10.0 10.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.38 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.32 0.27 0.27 0.27
Uniform Del: 53.0 28.3 28.3 38.3 20.0 20.0 36.0 0.0 35.3 51.6 51.6 51.6
IncremntDel: 1.9 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.4 1.0 1.0 1.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 54.9 28.5 28.5 38.3 20.2 20.2 36.5 0.0 35.7 52.6 52.6 52.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 54.9 28.5 28.5 38.3 20.2 20.2 36.5 0.0 35.7 52.6 52.6 52.6
LOS by Move: D-C C D+ C+ C+ D+ A D+ D-D-D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 5 5 0 8 8 6 0 5 2 2 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-55
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #32: Stevens Creek Blvd and Tantau Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:176***0 79
Lanes:0 0 1!0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
184*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
543 2 Critical V/C:0.593 3 740***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):42.9 0
31 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):42.0 1 125
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Final Vol:75 169 68***
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 75 169 68 79 0 176 184 543 31 125 740 315
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 75 169 68 79 0 176 184 543 31 125 740 315
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 75 169 68 79 0 176 184 543 31 125 740 315
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 75 169 68 79 0 176 184 543 31 125 740 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 75 169 68 79 0 176 184 543 31 125 740 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 75 169 68 79 0 176 184 543 31 125 740 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.24 0.54 0.22 1.19 0.00 0.81 1.00 2.83 0.17 1.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 421 948 381 2078 0 1462 1750 5297 302 1750 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.04 0.00 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.07 0.13 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 36.1 36.1 36.1 24.4 0.0 24.4 21.3 28.0 28.0 19.5 26.3 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.19 0.00 0.59 0.59 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.59 0.00
Delay/Veh: 37.5 37.5 37.5 39.7 0.0 45.5 48.4 39.5 39.5 46.4 42.8 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 37.5 37.5 37.5 39.7 0.0 45.5 48.4 39.5 39.5 46.4 42.8 0.0
LOS by Move: D+ D+ D+ D A D D D D D D A
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 11 11 2 0 8 7 6 6 4 8 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-56
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #32: Stevens Creek Blvd and Tantau Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:228***0 417
Lanes:0 0 1!0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
95 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1291*** 2 Critical V/C:0.782 3 749
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):44.7 0
59 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):41.4 1 158***
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Final Vol:83***67 66
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 69
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 69
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 69
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.38 0.31 0.31 1.48 0.00 0.52 1.00 2.86 0.14 1.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 672 543 535 2586 0 914 1750 5355 245 1750 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.00 0.25 0.05 0.24 0.24 0.09 0.13 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 18.9 18.9 18.9 38.3 0.0 38.3 15.6 37.0 37.0 13.8 35.2 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.51 0.00 0.78 0.42 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.45 0.00
Uniform Del: 48.6 48.6 48.6 33.2 0.0 37.1 48.0 37.8 37.8 51.6 34.5 0.0
IncremntDel: 13.5 13.5 13.5 0.3 0.0 4.9 1.2 2.4 2.4 17.8 0.2 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 62.1 62.1 62.1 33.5 0.0 42.0 49.2 40.2 40.2 69.4 34.7 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 62.1 62.1 62.1 33.5 0.0 42.0 49.2 40.2 40.2 69.4 34.7 0.0
LOS by Move: E E E C-A D D D D E C-A
HCM2kAvgQ: 10 10 10 9 0 16 3 16 16 7 7 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-57
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #34: Lawrence Expressway and Homestead Road (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:389 1194 106***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
286*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):190
1 299
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
322 2 Critical V/C:0.850 2 583***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):47.7 0
129 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):48.0 2 358
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:258 2954***243
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 258 3376 243 106 1365 389 286 322 129 358 583 299
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 258 3376 243 106 1365 389 286 322 129 358 583 299
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 258 3376 243 106 1365 389 286 322 129 358 583 299
User Adj: 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 258 2954 243 106 1194 389 286 322 129 358 583 299
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 258 2954 243 106 1194 389 286 322 129 358 583 299
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 258 2954 243 106 1194 389 286 322 129 358 583 299
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.52 0.14 0.03 0.21 0.22 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.11 0.15 0.17
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 34.7 116 147.2 7.5 88.7 109.0 20.3 23.3 58.0 31.3 34.3 41.8
Volume/Cap: 0.45 0.85 0.18 0.85 0.45 0.39 0.85 0.69 0.24 0.69 0.85 0.78
Delay/Veh: 69.7 32.2 5.7 129.9 34.3 22.4 101.5 84.3 49.7 78.7 85.2 79.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 69.7 32.2 5.7 129.9 34.3 22.4 101.5 84.3 49.7 78.7 85.2 79.2
LOS by Move: E C-A F C-C+ F F D E-F E-
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 44 4 6 15 13 12 10 6 13 19 19
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-58
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #34: Lawrence Expressway and Homestead Road (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:374 2787***240
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
381 2
Cycle Time (sec):190
1 179
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
605*** 2 Critical V/C:0.856 2 459
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):45.8 0
262 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):45.8 2 353***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:132***1319 400
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 14 85 10 14 107 10 14 10 10 14 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 132 1713 400 240 3399 374 381 605 262 353 459 179
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 132 1713 400 240 3399 374 381 605 262 353 459 179
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 132 1713 400 240 3399 374 381 605 262 353 459 179
User Adj: 1.00 0.77 1.00 1.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 132 1319 400 240 2787 374 381 605 262 353 459 179
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 132 1319 400 240 2787 374 381 605 262 353 459 179
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 132 1319 400 240 2787 374 381 605 262 353 459 179
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.23 0.23 0.08 0.49 0.21 0.12 0.16 0.15 0.11 0.12 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 14.0 103 126.9 17.6 107 135.5 28.5 33.5 47.5 23.5 28.5 46.1
Volume/Cap: 0.57 0.43 0.34 0.82 0.87 0.30 0.81 0.90 0.60 0.90 0.81 0.42
Uniform Del: 85.1 25.7 13.6 84.7 35.5 9.9 78.1 76.7 62.9 82.1 78.1 60.7
IncremntDel: 3.3 0.1 0.2 16.8 2.8 0.1 9.8 15.8 2.3 23.8 8.3 0.7
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.66 0.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 88.4 25.8 13.7 101.5 26.1 2.1 87.9 92.5 65.2 105.9 86.3 61.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 88.4 25.8 13.7 101.5 26.1 2.1 87.9 92.5 65.2 105.9 86.3 61.4
LOS by Move: F C B F C A F F E F F E
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 14 10 10 40 2 15 20 16 15 15 10
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-59
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #36: Stevens Creek Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:154 233 761***
Lanes:0 1 0 1 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
749*** 2 Critical V/C:0.553 3 1189
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):29.9 0
164 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):27.6 2 222***
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:68***0 146
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 68 0 146 761 233 154 0 749 164 222 1189 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 68 0 146 761 233 154 0 749 164 222 1189 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 68 0 146 761 233 154 0 749 164 222 1189 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 68 0 146 761 233 154 0 749 164 222 1189 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 68 0 146 761 233 154 0 749 164 222 1189 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 68 0 146 761 233 154 0 749 164 222 1189 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.60 0.40 0.00 2.44 0.56 2.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 3546 1086 718 0 4593 1006 3150 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.00 0.08 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.21 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 22.3 37.3 37.3 37.3 0.0 28.4 28.4 12.3 40.7 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.39 0.00 0.37 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.51 0.00
Delay/Veh: 43.6 0.0 33.6 25.4 25.4 25.4 0.0 31.2 31.2 43.5 22.5 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 43.6 0.0 33.6 25.4 25.4 25.4 0.0 31.2 31.2 43.5 22.5 0.0
LOS by Move: D A C-C C C A C C D C+ A
HCM2kAvgQ: 3 0 4 10 10 10 0 8 8 4 9 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-60
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #36: Stevens Creek Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:37 427 413***
Lanes:0 1 0 1 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1173 2 Critical V/C:0.798 3 1034
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):39.9 0
660*** 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):30.8 2 464***
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:24***0 33
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.43 1.45 0.12 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 2519 2605 226 0 3800 1750 3150 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.31 0.38 0.15 0.18 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 26.7 18.6 18.6 18.6 0.0 42.7 42.7 16.7 59.4 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.00 0.07 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.00 0.72 0.88 0.88 0.31 0.00
Uniform Del: 41.1 0.0 27.4 39.6 39.6 39.6 0.0 23.7 26.3 40.7 10.1 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.4 0.0 0.1 9.4 9.4 9.4 0.0 1.0 4.8 16.0 0.1 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 41.4 0.0 27.5 49.0 49.0 49.0 0.0 24.8 31.2 56.7 10.1 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.4 0.0 27.5 49.0 49.0 49.0 0.0 24.8 31.2 56.7 10.1 0.0
LOS by Move: D A C D D D A C C E+ B+ A
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 1 13 13 13 0 14 20 9 5 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-61
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #38: Stevens Creek Blvd/Agilent Drwy (SJ)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Final Vol:4 1***2
Lanes:1 0 1!0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
245*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):160
0 402
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
1394 2 Critical V/C:0.526 3 2252***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):20.2 0
18 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):16.1 1 27
LOS:B
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:1 0 0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Agilent Drwy Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 1 0 0 2 1 4 245 1394 18 27 2252 402
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 1 0 0 2 1 4 245 1394 18 27 2252 402
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 1 0 0 2 1 4 245 1394 18 27 2252 402
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1 0 0 2 1 4 245 1394 18 27 2252 402
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1 0 0 2 1 4 245 1394 18 27 2252 402
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 1 0 0 2 1 4 245 1394 18 27 2252 402
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.25 0.25 1.50 1.00 2.96 0.04 1.00 3.37 0.63
Final Sat.: 1750 1900 0 2197 447 2694 1750 5529 71 1750 6362 1136
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.25 0.25 0.02 0.35 0.35
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 40.0 120 120.2 20.8 101 101.0
Volume/Cap: 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.02 0.56 0.34 0.34 0.12 0.56 0.56
Delay/Veh: 70.4 0.0 0.0 70.4 70.5 70.4 54.0 6.7 6.7 61.7 17.0 17.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 70.4 0.0 0.0 70.4 70.5 70.4 54.0 6.7 6.7 61.7 17.0 17.0
LOS by Move: E A A E E E D-A A E B B
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 8 8 1 18 18
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-62
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #38: Stevens Creek Blvd/Agilent Drwy (SJ)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Final Vol:219***0 175
Lanes:1 0 1!0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
93 1
Cycle Time (sec):130
0 21
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
1649*** 2 Critical V/C:0.420 3 2102
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):16.9 0
1 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):16.0 1 27***
LOS:B
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:33 0 8
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Agilent Drwy Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 33 0 8 175 0 219 93 1649 1 27 2102 21
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 33 0 8 175 0 219 93 1649 1 27 2102 21
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 33 0 8 175 0 219 93 1649 1 27 2102 21
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 33 0 8 175 0 219 93 1649 1 27 2102 21
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 33 0 8 175 0 219 93 1649 1 27 2102 21
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 33 0 8 175 0 219 93 1649 1 27 2102 21
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.44 0.00 1.56 1.00 2.99 0.01 1.00 3.96 0.04
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1800 2527 0 2723 1750 5597 3 1750 7426 74
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.08 0.05 0.29 0.29 0.02 0.28 0.28
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 24.4 0.0 24.4 24.4 0.0 24.4 15.4 89.6 89.6 7.0 81.1 81.1
Volume/Cap: 0.10 0.00 0.02 0.37 0.00 0.43 0.45 0.43 0.43 0.29 0.45 0.45
Uniform Del: 43.7 0.0 43.0 46.0 0.0 46.6 53.3 8.9 8.9 59.1 12.8 12.8
IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 1.5 0.1 0.1 1.7 0.1 0.1
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 43.8 0.0 43.1 46.3 0.0 46.9 54.9 9.0 9.0 60.8 12.9 12.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 43.8 0.0 43.1 46.3 0.0 46.9 54.9 9.0 9.0 60.8 12.9 12.9
LOS by Move: D A D D A D D-A A E B B
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 0 5 0 6 4 9 9 1 11 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-63
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #39: Stevens Creek Blvd and Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:568***0 88
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Signal=Permit Signal=Permit
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):6
0
1396 5 Critical V/C:0.732 3 2113***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):25.7 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):22.7 0 0
LOS:C+
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 88 0 568 0 1396 0 0 2113 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 88 0 568 0 1396 0 0 2113 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 88 0 568 0 1396 0 0 2113 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 88 0 568 0 1396 0 0 2113 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 88 0 568 0 1396 0 0 2113 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 88 0 568 0 1396 0 0 2113 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1750 0 1750 0 9500 0 0 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.2 0.0 53.2 0.0 60.8 0.0 0.0 60.8 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.6 0.0 31.1 0.0 17.2 0.0 0.0 24.2 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.6 0.0 31.1 0.0 17.2 0.0 0.0 24.2 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A B-A C A B A A C A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 2 0 19 0 6 0 0 20 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-64
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #39: Stevens Creek Blvd and Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:650***0 288
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Signal=Permit Signal=Permit
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):6
0
1688 5 Critical V/C:0.651 3 1406***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):27.5 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):26.8 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 288 0 650 0 1688 0 0 1406 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 288 0 650 0 1688 0 0 1406 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 288 0 650 0 1688 0 0 1406 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 288 0 650 0 1688 0 0 1406 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 288 0 650 0 1688 0 0 1406 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 288 0 650 0 1688 0 0 1406 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1750 0 1750 0 9500 0 0 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.5 0.0 68.5 0.0 45.5 0.0 0.0 45.5 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00
Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.2 0.0 17.6 0.0 28.1 0.0 0.0 30.7 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.4 0.0 19.1 0.0 28.2 0.0 0.0 31.4 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.4 0.0 19.1 0.0 28.2 0.0 0.0 31.4 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A B A B-A C A A C A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 6 0 18 0 9 0 0 14 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-65
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #40: Stevens Creek Blvd and NB Lawrence Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:0 0 0
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
509*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 236
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
975 3 Critical V/C:0.736 3 1222***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):36.8 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):32.6 0 0
LOS:C-
Lanes:1 1 0 1 0
Final Vol:891***574 165
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: NB Lawrence Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 891 574 165 0 0 0 509 975 0 0 1222 236
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 891 574 165 0 0 0 509 975 0 0 1222 236
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 891 574 165 0 0 0 509 975 0 0 1222 236
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 891 574 165 0 0 0 509 975 0 0 1222 236
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 891 574 165 0 0 0 509 975 0 0 1222 236
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 891 574 165 0 0 0 509 975 0 0 1222 236
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.65 1.05 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 2924 1884 542 0 0 0 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.13
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 49.7 49.7 49.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.4 61.3 0.0 0.0 35.0 35.0
Volume/Cap: 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.46
Delay/Veh: 30.9 30.9 30.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.7 17.4 0.0 0.0 40.1 35.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 30.9 30.9 30.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.7 17.4 0.0 0.0 40.1 35.5
LOS by Move: C C C A A A D B A A D D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 19 19 19 0 0 0 11 7 0 0 15 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-66
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #40: Stevens Creek Blvd and NB Lawrence Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:0 0 0
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
325*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 242
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1499 3 Critical V/C:0.564 3 897***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):31.2 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):28.9 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:1 1 0 1 0
Final Vol:420 646***321
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: NB Lawrence Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 420 646 321 0 0 0 325 1499 0 0 897 242
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 420 646 321 0 0 0 325 1499 0 0 897 242
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 420 646 321 0 0 0 325 1499 0 0 897 242
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 420 646 321 0 0 0 325 1499 0 0 897 242
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 420 646 321 0 0 0 325 1499 0 0 897 242
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 420 646 321 0 0 0 325 1499 0 0 897 242
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.32 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 2471 1228 0 0 0 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.14
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 55.6 55.6 55.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.9 55.4 0.0 0.0 33.5 33.5
Volume/Cap: 0.52 0.56 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.50
Uniform Del: 22.7 23.4 23.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.7 23.6 0.0 0.0 37.0 36.2
IncremntDel: 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.8
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 22.9 23.7 23.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.0 23.9 0.0 0.0 37.5 37.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 22.9 23.7 23.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.0 23.9 0.0 0.0 37.5 37.0
LOS by Move: C+ C C A A A D C A A D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 12 13 13 0 0 0 6 13 0 0 10 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-67
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #41: Lawrence Expressway and Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 826 633***
Lanes:0 0 2 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Ignore Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
94 0
Cycle Time (sec):160
0 0
1
Loss Time (sec):6
0
283*** 0 Critical V/C:0.919 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):51.9 0
0 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):42.1 0 0
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0 2702***508
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 2702 508 633 826 0 94 283 247 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 2702 508 633 826 0 94 283 247 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 2702 508 633 826 0 94 283 247 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2702 508 633 826 0 94 283 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2702 508 633 826 0 94 283 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2702 508 633 826 0 94 283 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.25 0.75 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 3150 3800 0 449 1351 1750 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.47 0.29 0.20 0.22 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 82.5 82.5 35.0 118 0.0 36.5 36.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.92 0.56 0.92 0.30 0.00 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 40.9 27.2 78.6 7.3 0.0 85.8 85.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 40.9 27.2 78.6 7.3 0.0 85.8 85.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D C E-A A F F A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 41 17 22 7 0 20 20 0 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-68
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #41: Lawrence Expressway and Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2498***764
Lanes:0 0 2 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Ignore Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
41*** 0
Cycle Time (sec):160
0 0
1
Loss Time (sec):6
0
306 0 Critical V/C:0.883 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):26.5 0
0 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):33.2 0 0
LOS:C-
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0***1228 236
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 14 10 10 14 110 10 14 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1228 236 764 2498 0 41 306 971 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1228 236 764 2498 0 41 306 971 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1228 236 764 2498 0 41 306 971 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1228 236 764 2498 0 41 306 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1228 236 764 2498 0 41 306 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1228 236 764 2498 0 41 306 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.12 0.88 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 3150 3800 0 213 1587 1750 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.22 0.13 0.24 0.66 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 56.0 56.0 63.1 119 0.0 34.9 34.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.62 0.39 0.62 0.88 0.00 0.88 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Del: 0.0 43.1 39.1 38.8 15.3 0.0 60.6 60.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.9 3.7 0.0 20.3 20.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 43.6 39.5 39.7 18.9 0.0 80.9 80.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 43.6 39.5 39.7 18.9 0.0 80.9 80.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D D D B-A F F A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 16 9 18 47 0 18 18 0 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-69
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #43: Lawrence Expressway and Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:168 544 119***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
719*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):160
1 136
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
405 2 Critical V/C:0.832 2 514***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):53.0 0
132 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):49.7 1 127
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:194 2099***100
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 194 2099 100 119 544 168 719 405 132 127 514 136
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 194 2099 100 119 544 168 719 405 132 127 514 136
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 194 2099 100 119 544 168 719 405 132 127 514 136
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 194 2099 100 119 544 168 719 405 132 127 514 136
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 194 2099 100 119 544 168 719 405 132 127 514 136
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 194 2099 100 119 544 168 719 405 132 127 514 136
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.37 0.06 0.04 0.10 0.10 0.23 0.11 0.08 0.07 0.14 0.08
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 30.6 70.8 99.1 7.3 47.5 91.4 43.9 41.6 72.2 28.3 26.0 26.0
Volume/Cap: 0.32 0.83 0.09 0.83 0.32 0.17 0.83 0.41 0.17 0.41 0.83 0.48
Delay/Veh: 56.0 41.8 12.3 107.8 43.9 16.4 61.5 49.3 26.1 59.3 74.3 62.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 56.0 41.8 12.3 107.8 43.9 16.4 61.5 49.3 26.1 59.3 74.3 62.1
LOS by Move: E+ D B F D B E D C E+ E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 30 2 4 7 4 22 8 4 6 14 7
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-70
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #43: Lawrence Expressway and Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:576 2093 413***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
291 2
Cycle Time (sec):160
1 133
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
586*** 2 Critical V/C:0.561 2 496
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):50.8 0
304 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):43.5 1 138***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:210 881***143
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 14 66 10 14 71 10 14 10 10 14 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 210 881 143 413 2093 576 291 586 304 138 496 133
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 210 881 143 413 2093 576 291 586 304 138 496 133
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 210 881 143 413 2093 576 291 586 304 138 496 133
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 210 881 143 413 2093 576 291 586 304 138 496 133
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 210 881 143 413 2093 576 291 586 304 138 496 133
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 210 881 143 413 2093 576 291 586 304 138 496 133
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.15 0.08 0.13 0.37 0.33 0.09 0.15 0.17 0.08 0.13 0.08
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 15.7 66.0 83.8 29.5 79.8 101.5 21.7 34.7 50.5 17.8 30.7 30.7
Volume/Cap: 0.68 0.37 0.16 0.71 0.74 0.52 0.68 0.71 0.55 0.71 0.68 0.40
Uniform Del: 69.7 32.7 19.8 61.2 31.8 15.9 65.8 58.0 45.4 68.6 60.1 56.5
IncremntDel: 5.9 0.1 0.1 4.1 1.0 0.4 4.4 2.9 1.2 11.6 2.6 0.8
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 75.6 32.8 19.9 65.3 32.8 16.4 70.2 60.9 46.6 80.2 62.7 57.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 75.6 32.8 19.9 65.3 32.8 16.4 70.2 60.9 46.6 80.2 62.7 57.3
LOS by Move: E-C-B-E C-B E E D F E E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 9 4 11 26 16 9 15 15 9 13 7
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-71
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #94: De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:149 700 0***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
353 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 2***
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
25*** 1! Critical V/C:0.446 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):18.7 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):20.2 0 0
LOS:C+
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:51 1653***11
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Rainbow Dr (south)
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 51 1653 11 0 700 149 353 25 0 0 0 2
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 51 1653 11 0 700 149 353 25 0 0 0 2
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 51 1653 11 0 700 149 353 25 0 0 0 2
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 51 1653 11 0 700 149 353 25 0 0 0 2
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 51 1653 11 0 700 149 353 25 0 0 0 2
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 51 1653 11 0 700 149 353 25 0 0 0 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.98 0.02 0.00 2.45 0.55 1.88 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 5563 37 0 4616 983 3283 217 0 0 0 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 20.5 75.7 75.7 0.0 55.1 55.1 29.3 29.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.18 0.49 0.49 0.00 0.34 0.34 0.45 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
Delay/Veh: 44.8 13.5 13.5 0.0 22.6 22.6 40.9 41.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 52.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 44.8 13.5 13.5 0.0 22.6 22.6 40.9 41.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 52.5
LOS by Move: D B B A C+ C+ D D A A A D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 12 12 0 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-72
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #94: De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:256 1991***0
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
255 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 8
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1*** 1! Critical V/C:0.599 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):23.3 0
66 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):18.7 0 5***
LOS:B-
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:71***1111 4
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Rainbow Dr (south)
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 71 1111 4 0 1991 256 255 1 66 5 0 8
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 71 1111 4 0 1991 256 255 1 66 5 0 8
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 71 1111 4 0 1991 256 255 1 66 5 0 8
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 71 1111 4 0 1991 256 255 1 66 5 0 8
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 71 1111 4 0 1991 256 255 1 66 5 0 8
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 71 1111 4 0 1991 256 255 1 66 5 0 8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.99 0.01 0.00 2.65 0.35 1.65 0.01 0.34 0.38 0.00 0.62
Final Sat.: 1750 5580 20 0 4961 638 2897 9 594 673 0 1077
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.01 0.00 0.01
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 8.9 96.7 96.7 0.0 87.8 87.8 24.3 24.3 24.3 10.0 0.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.64 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.64 0.64 0.51 0.64 0.64 0.10 0.00 0.10
Uniform Del: 64.0 8.4 8.4 0.0 16.3 16.3 52.4 53.8 53.8 60.8 0.0 60.8
IncremntDel: 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.7 2.8 2.8 0.4 0.0 0.4
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 75.9 8.4 8.4 0.0 16.7 16.7 53.1 56.5 56.5 61.2 0.0 61.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 75.9 8.4 8.4 0.0 16.7 16.7 53.1 56.5 56.5 61.2 0.0 61.2
LOS by Move: E-A A A B B D-E+ E+ E A E
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 6 6 0 20 20 7 9 9 1 0 1
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-73
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #95: Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:59 24 90***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
8 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 24
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
574*** 2 Critical V/C:0.525 1 712
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):38.3 0
122 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):30.1 2 559***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Final Vol:154 15***566
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Bubb Rd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 154 15 566 90 24 59 8 574 122 559 712 24
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 154 15 566 90 24 59 8 574 122 559 712 24
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 154 15 566 90 24 59 8 574 122 559 712 24
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 154 15 566 90 24 59 8 574 122 559 712 24
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 154 15 566 90 24 59 8 574 122 559 712 24
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 154 15 566 90 24 59 8 574 122 559 712 24
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.97 0.95
Lanes: 0.91 0.09 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.93 0.07
Final Sat.: 1640 160 3150 1750 1900 1750 1750 3800 1750 3150 3579 121
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.09 0.18 0.05 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.15 0.07 0.18 0.20 0.20
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 22.2 22.2 64.1 12.2 12.2 12.2 17.2 35.7 35.7 41.9 60.5 60.5
Volume/Cap: 0.52 0.52 0.35 0.52 0.13 0.34 0.03 0.52 0.24 0.52 0.41 0.41
Delay/Veh: 47.7 47.7 17.7 56.1 51.4 53.4 46.3 37.5 34.0 33.5 20.5 20.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 47.7 47.7 17.7 56.1 51.4 53.4 46.3 37.5 34.0 33.5 20.5 20.5
LOS by Move: D D B E+ D-D-D D+ C-C-C+ C+
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 7 7 4 1 3 0 9 4 10 9 9
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-74
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #95: Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:16 27 63***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
28 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 38
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
641*** 2 Critical V/C:0.415 1 617
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):37.6 0
172 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):30.7 2 358***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Final Vol:76***34 562
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Bubb Rd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 76 34 562 63 27 16 28 641 172 358 617 38
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 76 34 562 63 27 16 28 641 172 358 617 38
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 76 34 562 63 27 16 28 641 172 358 617 38
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 76 34 562 63 27 16 28 641 172 358 617 38
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 76 34 562 63 27 16 28 641 172 358 617 38
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 76 34 562 63 27 16 28 641 172 358 617 38
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.98 0.95
Lanes: 0.69 0.31 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.88 0.12
Final Sat.: 1244 556 3150 1750 1900 1750 1750 3800 1750 3150 3485 215
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.06 0.18 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.17 0.10 0.11 0.18 0.18
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 21.8 21.8 60.2 12.1 12.1 12.1 21.0 56.9 56.9 38.3 74.3 74.3
Volume/Cap: 0.39 0.39 0.42 0.42 0.16 0.11 0.11 0.42 0.24 0.42 0.33 0.33
Uniform Del: 53.1 53.1 27.7 60.6 59.2 58.9 51.4 29.7 27.3 41.6 18.8 18.8
IncremntDel: 0.9 0.9 0.2 1.8 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 54.0 54.0 27.9 62.4 59.7 59.2 51.6 29.8 27.5 42.0 18.9 18.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 54.0 54.0 27.9 62.4 59.7 59.2 51.6 29.8 27.5 42.0 18.9 18.9
LOS by Move: D-D-C E E+ E+ D-C C D B-B-
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 5 10 3 1 1 1 9 5 7 8 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-75
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #96: N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 214 179***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
61*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 177
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
279 2 Critical V/C:0.517 2 518***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):35.7 0
116 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):37.6 1 140
LOS:D+
Lanes:2 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:334 563***146
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd Homestead Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 334 563 146 179 214 69 61 279 116 140 518 177
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 334 563 146 179 214 69 61 279 116 140 518 177
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 334 563 146 179 214 69 61 279 116 140 518 177
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 334 563 146 179 214 0 61 279 116 140 518 177
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 334 563 146 179 214 0 61 279 116 140 518 177
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 334 563 146 179 214 0 61 279 116 140 518 177
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 1.58 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 2938 762 1750 1900 1750 1750 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.19 0.19 0.10 0.11 0.00 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.14 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 33.1 44.5 44.5 23.8 35.2 0.0 8.1 20.3 20.3 19.5 31.7 31.7
Volume/Cap: 0.38 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.38 0.00 0.52 0.43 0.39 0.49 0.52 0.38
Delay/Veh: 35.5 29.7 29.7 44.4 34.2 0.0 58.0 45.2 45.2 47.1 38.1 36.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 35.5 29.7 29.7 44.4 34.2 0.0 58.0 45.2 45.2 47.1 38.1 36.7
LOS by Move: D+ C C D C-A E+ D D D D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 10 10 7 6 0 3 5 4 6 8 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-76
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #96: N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 424***271
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
63 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 193
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
481 2 Critical V/C:0.625 2 453
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):42.9 0
272*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):40.4 1 189***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:239***320 64
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd Homestead Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 239 320 64 271 424 119 63 481 272 189 453 193
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 239 320 64 271 424 119 63 481 272 189 453 193
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 239 320 64 271 424 119 63 481 272 189 453 193
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 239 320 64 271 424 0 63 481 272 189 453 193
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 239 320 64 271 424 0 63 481 272 189 453 193
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 239 320 64 271 424 0 63 481 272 189 453 193
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 1.66 0.34 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 3083 617 1750 1900 1750 1750 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.22 0.00 0.04 0.13 0.16 0.11 0.12 0.11
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 14.6 23.0 23.0 34.4 42.8 0.0 16.6 29.8 29.8 20.7 34.0 34.0
Volume/Cap: 0.62 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.62 0.00 0.26 0.51 0.62 0.62 0.42 0.39
Uniform Del: 50.1 43.7 43.7 36.1 31.9 0.0 46.2 38.8 40.1 46.0 35.0 34.7
IncremntDel: 3.2 0.8 0.8 1.2 1.8 0.0 0.6 0.5 2.8 4.1 0.3 0.5
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 53.3 44.6 44.6 37.3 33.8 0.0 46.8 39.2 42.9 50.1 35.3 35.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 53.3 44.6 44.6 37.3 33.8 0.0 46.8 39.2 42.9 50.1 35.3 35.2
LOS by Move: D-D D D+ C-A D D D D D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 7 7 9 13 0 2 8 10 8 7 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-77
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #131: Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:120 81 89***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
113*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 76
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
557 2 Critical V/C:0.501 2 1235***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):28.1 0
35 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):30.6 1 75
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Final Vol:114 141 178***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 114 141 178 89 81 120 113 557 35 75 1235 76
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 114 141 178 89 81 120 113 557 35 75 1235 76
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 114 141 178 89 81 120 113 557 35 75 1235 76
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 114 141 178 89 81 120 113 557 35 75 1235 76
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 114 141 178 89 81 120 113 557 35 75 1235 76
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 114 141 178 89 81 120 113 557 35 75 1235 76
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.82 0.18 1.00 2.82 0.18
Final Sat.: 1750 1900 1750 1750 1900 1750 1750 5268 331 1750 5275 325
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.07 0.10 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.06 0.11 0.11 0.04 0.23 0.23
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 16.0 24.3 24.3 12.2 20.5 20.5 15.5 46.1 46.1 25.4 56.0 56.0
Volume/Cap: 0.49 0.37 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.40 0.50 0.28 0.28 0.20 0.50 0.50
Delay/Veh: 49.8 41.8 43.6 53.3 43.5 45.2 50.5 25.5 25.5 39.2 22.4 22.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 49.8 41.8 43.6 53.3 43.5 45.2 50.5 25.5 25.5 39.2 22.4 22.4
LOS by Move: D D D D-D D D C C D C+ C+
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 5 7 4 3 5 5 5 5 2 11 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-78
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #131: Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:63 206 131***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
128 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 83
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1642*** 2 Critical V/C:0.657 2 993
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):31.8 0
76 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):31.2 1 194***
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Final Vol:58 93 173***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 58 93 173 131 206 63 128 1642 76 194 993 83
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 58 93 173 131 206 63 128 1642 76 194 993 83
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 58 93 173 131 206 63 128 1642 76 194 993 83
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 58 93 173 131 206 63 128 1642 76 194 993 83
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 58 93 173 131 206 63 128 1642 76 194 993 83
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 58 93 173 131 206 63 128 1642 76 194 993 83
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.86 0.14 1.00 2.76 0.24
Final Sat.: 1750 1900 1750 1750 1900 1750 1750 5352 248 1750 5167 432
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.05 0.10 0.07 0.11 0.04 0.07 0.31 0.31 0.11 0.19 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 11.1 18.1 18.1 13.7 20.6 20.6 21.0 56.0 56.0 20.2 55.2 55.2
Volume/Cap: 0.36 0.33 0.66 0.66 0.63 0.21 0.42 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.42 0.42
Uniform Del: 51.1 45.5 48.1 50.9 46.1 42.7 44.0 24.6 24.6 46.6 21.6 21.6
IncremntDel: 1.4 0.7 5.9 7.8 3.9 0.3 0.9 0.6 0.6 5.3 0.1 0.1
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 52.5 46.2 54.0 58.7 50.1 43.0 45.0 25.2 25.2 52.0 21.7 21.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 52.5 46.2 54.0 58.7 50.1 43.0 45.0 25.2 25.2 52.0 21.7 21.7
LOS by Move: D-D D-E+ D D D C C D-C+ C+
HCM2kAvgQ: 3 3 8 6 8 2 5 17 17 7 8 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-79
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #1029: Tantau Avenue and Transit Center Exit (CUP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 216 0
Lanes:0 0 1 0 0
Signal=Permit Signal=Permit
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):6
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.351 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):0.3 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):10.4 0 0
LOS:B+
Lanes:0 0 1 0 0
Final Vol:0 634***0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Transit Center Exit
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 634 0 0 216 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 634 0 0 216 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 634 0 0 216 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 634 0 0 216 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 634 0 0 216 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 634 0 0 216 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 1900 0 0 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: ****
Green Time: 0.0 114 0.0 0.0 29.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 39.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 39.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A A D A A A A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 2 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-80
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #1029: Tantau Avenue and Transit Center Exit (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 0 0
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):0
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.000 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):0.0 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):0.0 0 0
LOS:
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Transit Center Exit
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj:0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves:
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move:
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-81
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #1030: Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:101 296 257***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
195*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):100
1 592***
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
73 0 Critical V/C:0.800 1 43
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):42.8 0
34 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):40.4 1 102
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:14 537***101
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Foothill Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 14 537 101 257 296 101 195 73 34 102 43 592
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 14 537 101 257 296 101 195 73 34 102 43 592
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 14 537 101 257 296 101 195 73 34 102 43 592
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 14 537 101 257 296 101 195 73 34 102 43 592
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 14 537 101 257 296 101 195 73 34 102 43 592
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 14 537 101 257 296 101 195 73 34 102 43 592
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.67 0.33 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.32 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 3114 586 3150 1900 1750 1750 1228 572 1750 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.17 0.17 0.08 0.16 0.06 0.11 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.34
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 9.8 21.6 21.6 10.2 21.9 21.9 13.9 33.1 33.1 23.2 42.3 42.3
Volume/Cap: 0.08 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.71 0.26 0.80 0.18 0.18 0.25 0.05 0.80
Delay/Veh: 41.2 42.9 42.9 57.2 41.8 32.7 58.6 24.0 24.0 31.7 17.1 31.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.2 42.9 42.9 57.2 41.8 32.7 58.6 24.0 24.0 31.7 17.1 31.3
LOS by Move: D D D E+ D C-E+ C C C B C
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 12 12 7 10 3 9 2 2 3 1 18
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-82
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #1030: Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:162 447***480
Lanes:1 0 1 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
56 1
Cycle Time (sec):100
1 189
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
61*** 0 Critical V/C:0.399 1 69
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):22.2 0
12 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):23.1 1 122***
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:10***254 99
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Foothill Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 10 254 99 480 447 162 56 61 12 122 69 189
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 10 254 99 480 447 162 56 61 12 122 69 189
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 10 254 99 480 447 162 56 61 12 122 69 189
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 10 254 99 480 447 162 56 61 12 122 69 189
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 10 254 99 480 447 162 56 61 12 122 69 189
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 10 254 99 480 447 162 56 61 12 122 69 189
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.42 0.58 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 2662 1037 3150 1900 1750 1750 1504 296 1750 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.24 0.09 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.11
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 7.0 24.5 24.5 37.3 54.8 65.6 10.8 10.0 17.0 16.2 15.4 52.7
Volume/Cap: 0.08 0.39 0.39 0.41 0.43 0.14 0.30 0.41 0.24 0.43 0.24 0.20
Uniform Del: 43.5 31.5 31.5 23.2 13.4 6.5 41.1 42.2 35.9 37.7 37.1 12.5
IncremntDel: 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.9 1.5 0.4 1.0 0.4 0.1
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 43.8 31.8 31.8 23.4 13.7 6.6 42.0 43.7 36.3 38.8 37.5 12.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 43.8 31.8 31.8 23.4 13.7 6.6 42.0 43.7 36.3 38.8 37.5 12.6
LOS by Move: D C C C B A D D D+ D+ D+ B
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 5 5 7 8 2 2 3 2 4 2 3
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-83
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing AM
Intersection #1031: Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:100***71 85
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
253*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):90
1 129
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
307 0 Critical V/C:0.613 1 358***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):33.5 0
57 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):31.5 1 55
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:247***519 36
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd McClellan Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 247 519 36 85 71 100 253 307 57 55 358 129
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 247 519 36 85 71 100 253 307 57 55 358 129
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 247 519 36 85 71 100 253 307 57 55 358 129
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 247 519 36 85 71 100 253 307 57 55 358 129
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 247 519 36 85 71 100 253 307 57 55 358 129
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 247 519 36 85 71 100 253 307 57 55 358 129
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.87 0.13 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 3460 240 1750 1900 1750 1750 1518 282 1750 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.04 0.06 0.14 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.19 0.07
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 20.2 19.9 19.9 10.3 10.0 10.0 20.7 34.5 34.5 13.3 27.0 27.0
Volume/Cap: 0.63 0.68 0.68 0.42 0.34 0.51 0.63 0.53 0.53 0.21 0.63 0.25
Delay/Veh: 34.7 34.4 34.4 38.5 37.3 39.1 34.3 22.2 22.2 34.2 29.4 24.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 34.7 34.4 34.4 38.5 37.3 39.1 34.3 22.2 22.2 34.2 29.4 24.0
LOS by Move: C-C-C-D+ D+ D C-C+ C+ C-C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 8 8 8 3 2 4 7 8 8 2 9 3
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 08:38:50 2014 Page 132-84
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
General Plan 2040
City of Cupertino
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
Existing PM
Intersection #1031: Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:118 465 319***
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
146 1
Cycle Time (sec):90
1 65
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
514*** 0 Critical V/C:0.749 1 364
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):35.6 0
113 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):33.3 1 106***
LOS:C-
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:103 146***68
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd McClellan Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 103 146 68 319 465 118 146 514 113 106 364 65
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 103 146 68 319 465 118 146 514 113 106 364 65
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 103 146 68 319 465 118 146 514 113 106 364 65
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 103 146 68 319 465 118 146 514 113 106 364 65
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 103 146 68 319 465 118 146 514 113 106 364 65
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 103 146 68 319 465 118 146 514 113 106 364 65
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.35 0.65 1.00 1.58 0.42 1.00 0.82 0.18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 2523 1175 1750 2951 749 1750 1476 324 1750 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.18 0.16 0.16 0.08 0.35 0.35 0.06 0.19 0.04
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.2 10.0 10.0 21.0 20.7 20.7 14.3 40.0 40.0 7.0 32.8 32.8
Volume/Cap: 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.78 0.68 0.68 0.53 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.53 0.10
Uniform Del: 37.6 37.7 37.7 32.4 31.6 31.6 34.8 21.3 21.3 40.7 22.5 18.9
IncremntDel: 2.4 1.2 1.2 9.5 2.3 2.3 1.9 5.1 5.1 24.3 0.8 0.1
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 40.0 38.9 38.9 41.9 34.0 34.0 36.6 26.3 26.3 65.1 23.3 19.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 40.0 38.9 38.9 41.9 34.0 34.0 36.6 26.3 26.3 65.1 23.3 19.0
LOS by Move: D D+ D+ D C-C-D+ C C E C B-
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 4 4 11 9 9 4 16 16 5 8 1
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #1: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:489***2 1314
Lanes:1 0 0 1 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1409*** 3 Critical V/C:0.601 2 990
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):33.4 0
211 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.2 2 198***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 1008 2 449 0 1098 172 138 934 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 1008 2 449 0 1098 172 138 934 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 75 0 40 0 174 39 23 28 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 231 0 0 0 137 0 37 28 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 1314 2 489 0 1409 211 198 990 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 1314 2 489 0 1409 211 198 990 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 1314 2 489 0 1409 211 198 990 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 1314 2 489 0 1409 211 198 990 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.99 0.01 1.00 0.00 3.44 0.56 2.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 4719 7 1750 0 6537 979 3150 3800 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.06 0.26 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 57.6 57.6 57.6 0.0 44.4 44.4 13.0 57.4 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.00 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.56 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.1 25.1 25.9 0.0 32.9 32.9 56.2 24.6 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.1 25.1 25.9 0.0 32.9 32.9 56.2 24.6 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A C C C A C-C-E+ C A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 15 15 15 0 12 12 4 13 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-2
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #1: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:545***2 1337
Lanes:1 0 0 1 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1372*** 3 Critical V/C:0.629 2 1017
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):34.8 0
198 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.6 2 198***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 1008 2 449 0 1098 172 138 934 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 1008 2 449 0 1098 172 138 934 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 98 0 96 0 137 26 23 55 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 231 0 0 0 137 0 37 28 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 1337 2 545 0 1372 198 198 1017 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 1337 2 545 0 1372 198 198 1017 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 1337 2 545 0 1372 198 198 1017 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 1337 2 545 0 1372 198 198 1017 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.87 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.99 0.01 1.00 0.00 3.47 0.53 2.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 4943 7 1750 0 6553 946 3150 3800 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.31 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.06 0.27 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 61.4 61.4 61.4 0.0 41.3 41.3 12.4 53.6 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.55 0.63 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.62 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.9 21.9 24.5 0.0 35.4 35.4 57.7 28.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.9 21.9 24.5 0.0 35.4 35.4 57.7 28.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A C+ C+ C A D+ D+ E+ C A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 13 13 17 0 12 12 4 14 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-3
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #1: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:624***2 1496
Lanes:1 0 0 1 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1450*** 3 Critical V/C:0.696 2 1063
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):36.7 0
216 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):31.1 2 212***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 1008 2 449 0 1098 172 138 934 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 1008 2 449 0 1098 172 138 934 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 257 0 175 0 215 44 37 101 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 231 0 0 0 137 0 37 28 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 1496 2 624 0 1450 216 212 1063 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 1496 2 624 0 1450 216 212 1063 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 1496 2 624 0 1450 216 212 1063 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 1496 2 624 0 1450 216 212 1063 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.99 0.01 1.00 0.00 3.44 0.56 2.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 4720 6 1750 0 6542 975 3150 3800 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.36 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.07 0.28 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.5 63.5 63.5 0.0 39.5 39.5 12.0 51.5 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.70 0.00 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.67 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.1 22.1 25.3 0.0 37.9 37.9 61.1 30.6 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.1 22.1 25.3 0.0 37.9 37.9 61.1 30.6 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A C+ C+ C A D+ D+ E C A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 16 16 20 0 14 14 4 15 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #1: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:659***2 1515
Lanes:1 0 0 1 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1484*** 3 Critical V/C:0.728 2 1087
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):38.0 0
221 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):31.9 2 227***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 1008 2 449 0 1098 172 138 934 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 1008 2 449 0 1098 172 138 934 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 276 0 210 0 249 49 52 125 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 231 0 0 0 137 0 37 28 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 1515 2 659 0 1484 221 227 1087 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 1515 2 659 0 1484 221 227 1087 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 1515 2 659 0 1484 221 227 1087 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 1515 2 659 0 1484 221 227 1087 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.99 0.01 1.00 0.00 3.44 0.56 2.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 4720 6 1750 0 6542 974 3150 3800 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.38 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.07 0.29 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 64.1 64.1 64.1 0.0 38.6 38.6 12.3 50.9 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.73 0.00 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.70 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.8 21.8 26.2 0.0 39.2 39.2 62.6 31.6 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.8 21.8 26.2 0.0 39.2 39.2 62.6 31.6 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A C+ C+ C A D D E C A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 17 17 22 0 14 14 5 16 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-5
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #2: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:47 84***4
Lanes:0 0 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
904*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1523 3 Critical V/C:0.933 3 687***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):68.9 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):51.1 0 0
LOS:D-
Lanes:0 0 1!0 1
Final Vol:455 49***393
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 NB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 441 49 364 4 71 29 771 1335 0 0 602 551
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 441 49 364 4 71 29 771 1335 0 0 602 551
Added Vol: 14 0 10 0 0 0 133 115 0 0 37 89
App+Div: 0 0 19 0 13 18 0 73 0 0 48 37
Initial Fut: 455 49 393 4 84 47 904 1523 0 0 687 677
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 455 49 393 4 84 47 904 1523 0 0 687 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 455 49 393 4 84 47 904 1523 0 0 687 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 455 49 393 4 84 47 904 1523 0 0 687 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.65 0.06 1.29 0.06 1.21 0.73 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1143 123 2244 109 2290 1281 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.40 0.40 0.18 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.29 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 50.4 50.4 50.4 10.0 10.0 10.0 36.3 51.6 0.0 0.0 15.3 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.98 0.98 0.43 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.98 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.98 0.00
Delay/Veh: 60.9 60.9 26.6 55.5 55.5 55.5 68.0 29.5 0.0 0.0 83.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 60.9 60.9 26.6 55.5 55.5 55.5 68.0 29.5 0.0 0.0 83.0 0.0
LOS by Move: E E C E+ E+ E+ E C A A F A
HCM2kAvgQ: 34 34 9 3 3 3 23 15 0 0 10 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-6
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #2: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:47 84***4
Lanes:0 0 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
867*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1546 3 Critical V/C:0.933 3 695***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):68.5 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):51.3 0 0
LOS:D-
Lanes:0 0 1!0 1
Final Vol:475 49***408
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 NB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 441 49 364 4 71 29 771 1335 0 0 602 551
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 441 49 364 4 71 29 771 1335 0 0 602 551
Added Vol: 34 0 25 0 0 0 96 138 0 0 45 84
App+Div: 0 0 19 0 13 18 0 73 0 0 48 37
Initial Fut: 475 49 408 4 84 47 867 1546 0 0 695 672
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 475 49 408 4 84 47 867 1546 0 0 695 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 475 49 408 4 84 47 867 1546 0 0 695 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 475 49 408 4 84 47 867 1546 0 0 695 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.65 0.07 1.28 0.06 1.24 0.70 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1165 120 2250 107 2240 1253 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.41 0.41 0.18 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.28 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 51.7 51.7 51.7 10.0 10.0 10.0 34.9 50.3 0.0 0.0 15.5 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.98 0.98 0.44 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.98 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.98 0.00
Delay/Veh: 59.5 59.5 25.9 55.6 55.6 55.6 69.1 30.8 0.0 0.0 82.4 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 59.5 59.5 25.9 55.6 55.6 55.6 69.1 30.8 0.0 0.0 82.4 0.0
LOS by Move: E+ E+ C E+ E+ E+ E C A A F A
HCM2kAvgQ: 35 35 9 3 3 3 22 15 0 0 10 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-7
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #2: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:47 84***4
Lanes:0 0 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
917*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1734 3 Critical V/C:0.990 3 727***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):85.0 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):60.2 0 0
LOS:E
Lanes:0 0 1!0 1
Final Vol:503***49 439
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 NB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 441 49 364 4 71 29 771 1335 0 0 602 551
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 441 49 364 4 71 29 771 1335 0 0 602 551
Added Vol: 62 0 56 0 0 0 146 326 0 0 77 154
App+Div: 0 0 19 0 13 18 0 73 0 0 48 37
Initial Fut: 503 49 439 4 84 47 917 1734 0 0 727 742
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 503 49 439 4 84 47 917 1734 0 0 727 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 503 49 439 4 84 47 917 1734 0 0 727 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 503 49 439 4 84 47 917 1734 0 0 727 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.65 0.06 1.29 0.06 1.21 0.73 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1147 112 2250 109 2290 1281 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.44 0.44 0.20 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.29 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 52.2 52.2 52.2 10.0 10.0 10.0 34.6 49.8 0.0 0.0 15.2 0.0
Volume/Cap: 1.04 1.04 0.46 0.45 0.45 0.45 1.04 0.76 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.00
Delay/Veh: 76.7 76.7 26.0 55.5 55.5 55.5 86.6 33.4 0.0 0.0 xxxx 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 76.7 76.7 26.0 55.5 55.5 55.5 86.6 33.4 0.0 0.0 xxxx 0.0
LOS by Move: E-E-C E+ E+ E+ F C-A A F A
HCM2kAvgQ: 41 41 10 3 3 3 26 18 0 0 11 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-8
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #2: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:47 84***4
Lanes:0 0 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
931*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1773 3 Critical V/C:1.017 3 753***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):94.2 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):65.1 0 0
LOS:E
Lanes:0 0 1!0 1
Final Vol:515 49***469
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 NB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 441 49 364 4 71 29 771 1335 0 0 602 551
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 441 49 364 4 71 29 771 1335 0 0 602 551
Added Vol: 74 0 86 0 0 0 160 365 0 0 103 168
App+Div: 0 0 19 0 13 18 0 73 0 0 48 37
Initial Fut: 515 49 469 4 84 47 931 1773 0 0 753 756
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 515 49 469 4 84 47 931 1773 0 0 753 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 515 49 469 4 84 47 931 1773 0 0 753 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 515 49 469 4 84 47 931 1773 0 0 753 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.65 0.06 1.29 0.06 1.21 0.73 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1134 108 2266 109 2290 1281 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.45 0.45 0.21 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.30 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 52.5 52.5 52.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 34.2 49.5 0.0 0.0 15.3 0.0
Volume/Cap: 1.07 1.07 0.49 0.45 0.45 0.45 1.07 0.78 0.00 0.00 1.07 0.00
Delay/Veh: 86.0 86.0 26.2 55.5 55.5 55.5 96.6 34.3 0.0 0.0 109 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 86.0 86.0 26.2 55.5 55.5 55.5 96.6 34.3 0.0 0.0 109 0.0
LOS by Move: F F C E+ E+ E+ F C-A A F A
HCM2kAvgQ: 44 44 11 3 3 3 27 19 0 0 12 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-9
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #3: Stevens Creek Blvd and Stelling Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:168 359***239
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
262 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 209
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
637 3 Critical V/C:0.730 2 843
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):49.6 0
313*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):46.2 2 511***
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:307***497 196
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Road Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 272 471 156 143 276 132 237 489 180 333 709 123
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 272 471 156 143 276 132 237 489 180 333 709 123
Added Vol: 19 18 8 75 7 23 20 99 6 2 84 73
App+Div: 16 8 32 21 76 13 5 49 127 176 50 13
Initial Fut: 307 497 196 239 359 168 262 637 313 511 843 209
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 307 497 196 239 359 168 262 637 313 511 843 209
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 307 497 196 239 359 168 262 637 313 511 843 209
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 307 497 196 239 359 168 262 637 313 511 843 209
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 0.67 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.36 0.64
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 1750 2520 1179 1750 5700 1750 3150 4491 1113
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.13 0.11 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.11 0.18 0.16 0.19 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 29.8 26.4 26.4 27.6 24.2 24.2 25.7 30.4 30.4 27.6 32.2 32.2
Volume/Cap: 0.73 0.61 0.53 0.61 0.73 0.73 0.72 0.46 0.73 0.73 0.72 0.72
Delay/Veh: 49.8 45.6 44.6 46.3 50.6 50.6 52.8 40.0 49.3 48.7 43.6 43.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 49.8 45.6 44.6 46.3 50.6 50.6 52.8 40.0 49.3 48.7 43.6 43.6
LOS by Move: D D D D D D D-D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 13 9 8 10 11 11 10 7 12 11 13 13
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-10
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #3: Stevens Creek Blvd and Stelling Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:170 359***237
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
276*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 204
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
665 3 Critical V/C:0.729 2 855***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):47.5 0
309 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):46.1 2 510
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:295***497 196
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Road Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 272 471 156 143 276 132 237 489 180 333 709 123
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 272 471 156 143 276 132 237 489 180 333 709 123
Added Vol: 7 18 8 73 7 25 34 127 2 1 96 68
App+Div: 16 8 32 21 76 13 5 49 127 176 50 13
Initial Fut: 295 497 196 237 359 170 276 665 309 510 855 204
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 295 497 196 237 359 170 276 665 309 510 855 204
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 295 497 196 237 359 170 276 665 309 510 855 204
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 295 497 196 237 359 170 276 665 309 510 855 204
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.34 0.66 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.40 0.60
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 1750 2510 1189 1750 5700 1750 3150 4520 1078
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.13 0.11 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.12 0.18 0.16 0.19 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 28.7 26.0 26.0 27.0 24.3 24.3 26.8 30.8 30.8 28.2 32.2 32.2
Volume/Cap: 0.73 0.62 0.53 0.62 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.47 0.71 0.71 0.73 0.73
Delay/Veh: 50.7 46.1 45.1 47.1 50.5 50.5 52.2 39.9 48.0 47.5 43.8 43.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 50.7 46.1 45.1 47.1 50.5 50.5 52.2 39.9 48.0 47.5 43.8 43.8
LOS by Move: D D D D D D D-D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 13 9 8 10 11 11 10 7 11 11 13 13
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-11
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #3: Stevens Creek Blvd and Stelling Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:175 360***279
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
288*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 250
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
868 3 Critical V/C:0.770 2 945***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):48.6 0
312 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):47.2 2 511
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:302***499 201
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Road Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 272 471 156 143 276 132 237 489 180 333 709 123
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 272 471 156 143 276 132 237 489 180 333 709 123
Added Vol: 14 20 13 115 8 30 46 330 5 2 186 114
App+Div: 16 8 32 21 76 13 5 49 127 176 50 13
Initial Fut: 302 499 201 279 360 175 288 868 312 511 945 250
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 302 499 201 279 360 175 288 868 312 511 945 250
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 302 499 201 279 360 175 288 868 312 511 945 250
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 302 499 201 279 360 175 288 868 312 511 945 250
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.31 0.69 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.33 0.67
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 1750 2487 1209 1750 5700 1750 3150 4428 1171
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.13 0.11 0.16 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.15 0.18 0.16 0.21 0.21
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 27.8 23.1 23.1 28.0 23.3 23.3 26.5 31.9 31.9 29.0 34.4 34.4
Volume/Cap: 0.77 0.71 0.62 0.71 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.59 0.69 0.69 0.77 0.77
Delay/Veh: 54.1 50.5 49.9 49.9 53.1 53.1 55.3 41.0 46.3 46.3 43.6 43.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 54.1 50.5 49.9 49.9 53.1 53.1 55.3 41.0 46.3 46.3 43.6 43.6
LOS by Move: D-D D D D-D-E+ D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 13 10 8 12 12 12 11 9 11 11 15 15
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-12
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #3: Stevens Creek Blvd and Stelling Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:175 361***293
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
289*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 253
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
937 3 Critical V/C:0.780 2 982***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):48.9 0
313 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):47.7 2 513
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:305***499 207
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Road Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 272 471 156 143 276 132 237 489 180 333 709 123
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 272 471 156 143 276 132 237 489 180 333 709 123
Added Vol: 17 20 19 129 9 30 47 399 6 4 223 117
App+Div: 16 8 32 21 76 13 5 49 127 176 50 13
Initial Fut: 305 499 207 293 361 175 289 937 313 513 982 253
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 305 499 207 293 361 175 289 937 313 513 982 253
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 305 499 207 293 361 175 289 937 313 513 982 253
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 305 499 207 293 361 175 289 937 313 513 982 253
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.31 0.69 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.34 0.66
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 1750 2490 1207 1750 5700 1750 3150 4454 1148
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.13 0.12 0.17 0.14 0.14 0.17 0.16 0.18 0.16 0.22 0.22
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 27.7 22.3 22.3 28.4 23.0 23.0 26.2 32.1 32.1 29.2 35.0 35.0
Volume/Cap: 0.78 0.73 0.66 0.73 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.64 0.69 0.69 0.78 0.78
Delay/Veh: 55.0 52.0 52.3 50.9 53.8 53.8 56.4 41.7 46.0 46.1 43.5 43.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 55.0 52.0 52.3 50.9 53.8 53.8 56.4 41.7 46.0 46.1 43.5 43.5
LOS by Move: E+ D-D-D D-D-E+ D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 14 10 9 12 12 12 11 10 11 11 15 15
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-13
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #4: Fremont Ave/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:147 1129 124***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
420*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 156
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
563 2 Critical V/C:0.814 2 695***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):44.3 0
163 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):42.8 2 207
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:210 2077***129
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road Fremonve Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 176 1772 100 111 815 136 389 504 115 165 639 143
Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 190 1914 108 120 880 147 420 544 124 178 690 154
Added Vol: 5 103 6 4 181 0 0 16 23 10 4 2
App+Div: 15 60 15 0 68 0 0 3 16 19 1 0
Initial Fut: 210 2077 129 124 1129 147 420 563 163 207 695 156
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 210 2077 129 124 1129 147 420 563 163 207 695 156
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 210 2077 129 124 1129 147 420 563 163 207 695 156
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 210 2077 129 124 1129 147 420 563 163 207 695 156
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.81 0.19 2.00 2.63 0.37 2.00 2.28 0.72 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5340 332 3150 4995 650 3150 4336 1256 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.39 0.39 0.04 0.23 0.23 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.07 0.18 0.09
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 16.8 66.7 66.7 7.0 56.9 56.9 22.9 36.0 36.0 18.2 31.4 31.4
Volume/Cap: 0.56 0.82 0.82 0.79 0.56 0.56 0.82 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.82 0.40
Delay/Veh: 59.9 33.4 33.4 88.3 32.1 32.1 66.3 44.7 44.7 57.7 57.7 46.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 59.9 33.4 33.4 88.3 32.1 32.1 66.3 44.7 44.7 57.7 57.7 46.9
LOS by Move: E+ C-C-F C-C-E D D E+ E+ D
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 28 28 5 14 14 13 9 9 5 16 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-14
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #4: Fremont Ave/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:147 1193 125***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
420*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 156
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
565 2 Critical V/C:0.828 2 695***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):44.8 0
164 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):43.1 2 212
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:211 2112***134
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road Fremonve Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 176 1772 100 111 815 136 389 504 115 165 639 143
Growth Adj:1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 190 1914 108 120 880 147 420 544 124 178 690 154
Added Vol: 6 138 11 5 245 0 0 18 24 15 4 2
App+Div: 15 60 15 0 68 0 0 3 16 19 1 0
Initial Fut: 211 2112 134 125 1193 147 420 565 164 212 695 156
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 211 2112 134 125 1193 147 420 565 164 212 695 156
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 211 2112 134 125 1193 147 420 565 164 212 695 156
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 211 2112 134 125 1193 147 420 565 164 212 695 156
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 0.98 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.81 0.19 2.00 2.66 0.34 2.00 2.30 0.70 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5265 334 3150 4985 614 3150 4338 1260 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.40 0.40 0.04 0.24 0.24 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.07 0.18 0.09
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 16.3 67.6 67.6 7.0 58.3 58.3 22.5 35.2 35.2 18.2 30.9 30.9
Volume/Cap: 0.57 0.83 0.83 0.79 0.57 0.57 0.83 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.83 0.41
Delay/Veh: 60.8 33.5 33.5 89.2 31.7 31.7 67.9 45.5 45.5 58.0 59.1 47.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 60.8 33.5 33.5 89.2 31.7 31.7 67.9 45.5 45.5 58.0 59.1 47.4
LOS by Move: E C-C-F C C E D D E+ E+ D
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 30 30 5 15 15 13 9 9 6 16 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-15
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #4: Fremont Ave/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:147 1347 141***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
420*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 158
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
575 2 Critical V/C:0.848 2 696***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):45.9 0
171 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):43.7 2 226
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:213 2210***140
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road Fremonve Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 176 1772 100 111 815 136 389 504 115 165 639 143
Growth Adj:1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 190 1914 108 120 880 147 420 544 124 178 690 154
Added Vol: 8 236 17 21 399 0 0 28 31 29 5 4
App+Div: 15 60 15 0 68 0 0 3 16 19 1 0
Initial Fut: 213 2210 140 141 1347 147 420 575 171 226 696 158
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 213 2210 140 141 1347 147 420 575 171 226 696 158
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 213 2210 140 141 1347 147 420 575 171 226 696 158
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 213 2210 140 141 1347 147 420 575 171 226 696 158
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.81 0.19 2.00 2.68 0.32 2.00 2.27 0.73 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5333 338 3150 5097 556 3150 4308 1282 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.41 0.41 0.04 0.26 0.26 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.07 0.18 0.09
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 15.4 68.4 68.4 7.4 60.3 60.3 22.0 34.0 34.0 18.3 30.2 30.2
Volume/Cap: 0.61 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.61 0.61 0.85 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.85 0.42
Delay/Veh: 62.7 33.9 33.9 97.2 31.3 31.3 70.3 46.8 46.8 58.6 61.0 48.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 62.7 33.9 33.9 97.2 31.3 31.3 70.3 46.8 46.8 58.6 61.0 48.1
LOS by Move: E C-C-F C C E D D E+ E D
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 31 31 6 17 17 13 10 10 6 17 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-16
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #4: Fremont Ave/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:148 1426 159***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
423*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 162
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
587 2 Critical V/C:0.868 2 700***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):47.4 0
175 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):44.5 2 233
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:216 2264***143
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road Fremonve Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 176 1772 100 111 815 136 389 504 115 165 639 143
Growth Adj:1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 190 1914 108 120 880 147 420 544 124 178 690 154
Added Vol: 11 290 20 39 478 1 3 40 35 36 9 8
App+Div: 15 60 15 0 68 0 0 3 16 19 1 0
Initial Fut: 216 2264 143 159 1426 148 423 587 175 233 700 162
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 216 2264 143 159 1426 148 423 587 175 233 700 162
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 216 2264 143 159 1426 148 423 587 175 233 700 162
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 216 2264 143 159 1426 148 423 587 175 233 700 162
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.81 0.19 2.00 2.70 0.30 2.00 2.27 0.73 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5334 337 3150 5123 531 3150 4306 1284 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.42 0.42 0.05 0.28 0.28 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.07 0.18 0.09
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 15.1 68.5 68.5 8.1 61.5 61.5 21.7 33.3 33.3 18.1 29.7 29.7
Volume/Cap: 0.63 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.63 0.63 0.87 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.87 0.44
Delay/Veh: 63.7 34.9 34.9 98.2 31.1 31.1 73.0 47.7 47.7 59.3 63.1 48.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 63.7 34.9 34.9 98.2 31.1 31.1 73.0 47.7 47.7 59.3 63.1 48.7
LOS by Move: E C-C-F C C E D D E+ E D
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 33 33 6 18 18 13 10 10 6 17 7
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-17
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #5: Homestead Road and De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:116 1517 235***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
399 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 423
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
554 2 Critical V/C:0.916 1 558
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):56.2 0
477*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):51.2 2 512***
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:351 1812***168
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
Added Vol: 17 71 90 82 125 6 22 77 79 44 13 21
App+Div: 38 120 20 8 106 19 20 17 55 24 20 2
Initial Fut: 351 1812 168 235 1517 116 399 554 477 512 558 423
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 351 1812 168 235 1517 116 399 554 477 512 558 423
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 351 1812 168 235 1517 116 399 554 477 512 558 423
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 351 1812 168 235 1517 116 399 554 477 512 558 423
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.10 0.90
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2084 1580
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.32 0.10 0.07 0.27 0.07 0.13 0.15 0.27 0.16 0.27 0.27
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 15.7 43.0 43.0 10.1 37.4 37.4 18.9 36.9 36.9 22.0 40.0 40.0
Volume/Cap: 0.88 0.92 0.28 0.92 0.88 0.22 0.83 0.49 0.92 0.92 0.83 0.83
Delay/Veh: 73.1 46.0 29.5 91.2 46.9 32.6 62.6 36.2 63.1 70.1 44.0 44.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 73.1 46.0 29.5 91.2 46.9 32.6 62.6 36.2 63.1 70.1 44.0 44.0
LOS by Move: E D C F D C-E D+ E E D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 24 5 8 21 4 11 9 23 15 20 20
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-18
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #5: Homestead Road and De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:130 1569***240
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
408 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 423
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
556 2 Critical V/C:0.955 1 560
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):66.4 0
515*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):56.0 2 513***
LOS:E+
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:409***1844 172
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
Added Vol: 75 103 94 87 177 20 31 79 117 45 15 21
App+Div: 38 120 20 8 106 19 20 17 55 24 20 2
Initial Fut: 409 1844 172 240 1569 130 408 556 515 513 560 423
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 409 1844 172 240 1569 130 408 556 515 513 560 423
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 409 1844 172 240 1569 130 408 556 515 513 560 423
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 409 1844 172 240 1569 130 408 556 515 513 560 423
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.12 0.88
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2107 1591
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.32 0.10 0.08 0.28 0.07 0.13 0.15 0.29 0.16 0.27 0.27
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 16.9 42.6 42.6 10.0 35.8 35.8 19.5 38.2 38.2 21.2 39.9 39.9
Volume/Cap: 0.95 0.94 0.29 0.94 0.95 0.26 0.83 0.47 0.95 0.95 0.83 0.83
Delay/Veh: 85.1 49.3 29.9 97.3 56.4 34.2 61.5 35.1 69.7 78.7 43.7 43.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 85.1 49.3 29.9 97.3 56.4 34.2 61.5 35.1 69.7 78.7 43.7 43.7
LOS by Move: F D C F E+ C-E D+ E E-D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 25 5 9 24 4 11 9 26 16 20 20
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-19
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #5: Homestead Road and De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:140 1710***263
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
421 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 463
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
597 2 Critical V/C:1.104 1 580
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):110.9 0
586*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):82.1 2 696***
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:446***1896 262
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
Added Vol: 112 155 184 110 318 30 44 120 188 228 35 61
App+Div: 38 120 20 8 106 19 20 17 55 24 20 2
Initial Fut: 446 1896 262 263 1710 140 421 597 586 696 580 463
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 446 1896 262 263 1710 140 421 597 586 696 580 463
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 446 1896 262 263 1710 140 421 597 586 696 580 463
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 446 1896 262 263 1710 140 421 597 586 696 580 463
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.07 0.93
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2036 1625
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.33 0.15 0.08 0.30 0.08 0.13 0.16 0.33 0.22 0.28 0.28
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 15.9 39.6 39.6 9.9 33.7 33.7 19.9 37.6 37.6 24.8 42.5 42.5
Volume/Cap: 1.10 1.04 0.47 1.04 1.10 0.29 0.83 0.52 1.10 1.10 0.83 0.83
Delay/Veh: 130.1 74.7 34.4 124.6 102 36.1 61.6 36.1 113.9 117.4 42.3 42.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 130.1 74.7 34.4 124.6 102 36.1 61.6 36.1 113.9 117.4 42.3 42.3
LOS by Move: F E C-F F D+ E D+ F F D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 14 29 8 10 32 5 12 10 35 25 21 21
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-20
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #5: Homestead Road and De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:150 1776***279
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
434 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 486
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
618 2 Critical V/C:1.189 1 587
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):144.6 0
643*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):101.5 2 758***
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:486***1920 277
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
Added Vol: 152 179 199 126 384 40 57 141 245 290 42 84
App+Div: 38 120 20 8 106 19 20 17 55 24 20 2
Initial Fut: 486 1920 277 279 1776 150 434 618 643 758 587 486
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 486 1920 277 279 1776 150 434 618 643 758 587 486
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 486 1920 277 279 1776 150 434 618 643 758 587 486
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 486 1920 277 279 1776 150 434 618 643 758 587 486
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.05 0.95
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2001 1657
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.34 0.16 0.09 0.31 0.09 0.14 0.16 0.37 0.24 0.29 0.29
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 16.1 38.5 38.5 10.1 32.5 32.5 20.3 38.3 38.3 25.1 43.1 43.1
Volume/Cap: 1.19 1.09 0.51 1.09 1.19 0.33 0.84 0.53 1.19 1.19 0.84 0.84
Delay/Veh: 161.0 91.5 35.9 137.8 138 37.3 62.3 35.8 145.3 149.6 42.6 42.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 161.0 91.5 35.9 137.8 138 37.3 62.3 35.8 145.3 149.6 42.6 42.6
LOS by Move: F F D+ F F D+ E D+ F F D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 17 32 9 11 37 5 12 10 43 29 22 22
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-21
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #6: De Anza Blvd and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:641***1900 0
Lanes:0 1 4 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 670
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.113 1!7***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):101.1 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):46.4 1 1008
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:575***1697 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 418 1446 0 0 1575 538 0 0 0 850 7 582
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 418 1446 0 0 1575 538 0 0 0 850 7 582
Added Vol: 145 167 0 0 157 92 0 0 0 141 0 11
App+Div: 12 84 0 0 168 11 0 0 0 17 0 77
Initial Fut: 575 1697 0 0 1900 641 0 0 0 1008 7 670
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 575 1697 0 0 1900 641 0 0 0 1008 7 670
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 575 1697 0 0 1900 641 0 0 0 1008 7 670
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 575 1697 0 0 1900 641 0 0 0 1008 7 670
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.59 0.01 1.40
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 7600 1750 0 0 0 2793 14 2443
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.48 0.27
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 20.3 61.2 0.0 0.0 40.8 40.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.8 53.8 53.8
Volume/Cap: 1.11 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.76 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 1.11 0.63
Delay/Veh: 126.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 38.2 99.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.1 95.6 27.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 126.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 38.2 99.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.1 95.6 27.8
LOS by Move: F C A A D+ F A A A C-F C
HCM2kAvgQ: 18 15 0 0 15 35 0 0 0 25 50 16
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-22
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #6: De Anza Blvd and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:661***1971 0
Lanes:0 1 4 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 692
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.183 1!7***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):130.6 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):53.7 1 1087
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:653***1768 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 418 1446 0 0 1575 538 0 0 0 850 7 582
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 418 1446 0 0 1575 538 0 0 0 850 7 582
Added Vol: 223 238 0 0 228 112 0 0 0 220 0 33
App+Div: 12 84 0 0 168 11 0 0 0 17 0 77
Initial Fut: 653 1768 0 0 1971 661 0 0 0 1087 7 692
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 653 1768 0 0 1971 661 0 0 0 1087 7 692
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 653 1768 0 0 1971 661 0 0 0 1087 7 692
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 653 1768 0 0 1971 661 0 0 0 1087 7 692
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.61 0.01 1.38
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 7600 1750 0 0 0 2811 14 2425
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.21 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.51 0.29
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 21.7 61.3 0.0 0.0 39.6 39.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.7 53.7 53.7
Volume/Cap: 1.18 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.81 1.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.89 1.18 0.66
Delay/Veh: 151.0 23.4 0.0 0.0 40.4 129.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.1 125 28.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 151.0 23.4 0.0 0.0 40.4 129.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.1 125 28.5
LOS by Move: F C A A D F A A A D+ F C
HCM2kAvgQ: 23 16 0 0 16 39 0 0 0 29 57 17
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-23
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #6: De Anza Blvd and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:878***2149 0
Lanes:0 1 4 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 712
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.407 1!7***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):228.1 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):83.2 1 1273
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:733***1928 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 418 1446 0 0 1575 538 0 0 0 850 7 582
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 418 1446 0 0 1575 538 0 0 0 850 7 582
Added Vol: 303 398 0 0 406 329 0 0 0 406 0 53
App+Div: 12 84 0 0 168 11 0 0 0 17 0 77
Initial Fut: 733 1928 0 0 2149 878 0 0 0 1273 7 712
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 733 1928 0 0 2149 878 0 0 0 1273 7 712
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 733 1928 0 0 2149 878 0 0 0 1273 7 712
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 733 1928 0 0 2149 878 0 0 0 1273 7 712
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.64 0.01 1.35
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 7600 1750 0 0 0 2865 12 2374
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.57 0.30
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 20.5 64.7 0.0 0.0 44.2 44.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.3 50.3 50.3
Volume/Cap: 1.41 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.79 1.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.10 1.41 0.74
Delay/Veh: 246.3 21.9 0.0 0.0 37.0 226.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 89.2 224 32.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 246.3 21.9 0.0 0.0 37.0 226.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 89.2 224 32.4
LOS by Move: F C+ A A D+ F A A A F F C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 32 17 0 0 17 68 0 0 0 45 80 19
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-24
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #6: De Anza Blvd and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:965***2245 0
Lanes:0 1 4 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 727
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.506 1!7***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):271.7 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):100.0 1 1350
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:781***1991 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 418 1446 0 0 1575 538 0 0 0 850 7 582
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 418 1446 0 0 1575 538 0 0 0 850 7 582
Added Vol: 351 461 0 0 502 416 0 0 0 483 0 68
App+Div: 12 84 0 0 168 11 0 0 0 17 0 77
Initial Fut: 781 1991 0 0 2245 965 0 0 0 1350 7 727
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 781 1991 0 0 2245 965 0 0 0 1350 7 727
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 781 1991 0 0 2245 965 0 0 0 1350 7 727
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 781 1991 0 0 2245 965 0 0 0 1350 7 727
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.64 0.01 1.35
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 7600 1750 0 0 0 2880 12 2359
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.25 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.60 0.31
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 20.4 65.8 0.0 0.0 45.4 45.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.2 49.2 49.2
Volume/Cap: 1.51 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.81 1.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.18 1.51 0.78
Delay/Veh: 289.3 21.5 0.0 0.0 36.6 269.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 125.4 269 34.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 289.3 21.5 0.0 0.0 36.6 269.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 125.4 269 34.1
LOS by Move: F C+ A A D+ F A A A F F C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 37 17 0 0 18 80 0 0 0 53 90 21
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-25
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #7: De Anza Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 2227 681***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
732 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
17*** 1! Critical V/C:1.086 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):94.8 0
988 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):47.0 0 0
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 5 0 1
Final Vol:0 1539 509***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1248 396 642 1783 0 616 17 634 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1248 396 642 1783 0 616 17 634 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 227 100 28 270 0 86 0 329 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 64 13 11 174 0 30 0 25 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1539 509 681 2227 0 732 17 988 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1539 509 681 2227 0 732 17 988 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1539 509 681 2227 0 732 17 988 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1539 509 681 2227 0 732 17 988 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.42 0.02 1.56 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2481 34 2737 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.16 0.29 0.22 0.39 0.00 0.29 0.50 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 33.2 33.2 24.7 57.9 0.0 57.1 57.1 57.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.61 1.09 1.09 0.84 0.00 0.64 1.09 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 40.1 112.3 111.3 31.4 0.0 26.1 83.3 30.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 40.1 112.3 111.3 31.4 0.0 26.1 83.3 30.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D F F C A C F C A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 11 31 20 24 0 16 49 23 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-26
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #7: De Anza Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 2363 695***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
764 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
17*** 1! Critical V/C:1.167 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):125.7 0
1124 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):54.3 0 0
LOS:D-
Lanes:0 0 5 0 1
Final Vol:0 1655 547***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1248 396 642 1783 0 616 17 634 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1248 396 642 1783 0 616 17 634 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 343 138 42 406 0 118 0 465 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 64 13 11 174 0 30 0 25 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1655 547 695 2363 0 764 17 1124 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1655 547 695 2363 0 764 17 1124 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1655 547 695 2363 0 764 17 1124 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1655 547 695 2363 0 764 17 1124 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.40 0.02 1.58 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2446 31 2773 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.17 0.31 0.22 0.41 0.00 0.31 0.55 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 33.2 33.2 23.4 56.7 0.0 58.3 58.3 58.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.65 1.17 1.17 0.91 0.00 0.66 1.17 0.86 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 40.9 141.5 142.6 36.4 0.0 25.9 115 32.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 40.9 141.5 142.6 36.4 0.0 25.9 115 32.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D F F D+ A C F C-A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 12 36 23 28 0 18 60 28 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-27
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #7: De Anza Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 2701 720***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
865 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
17*** 1! Critical V/C:1.337 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):196.8 0
1398 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):83.8 0 0
LOS:F
Lanes:0 0 5 0 1
Final Vol:0 1794 622***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1248 396 642 1783 0 616 17 634 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1248 396 642 1783 0 616 17 634 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 482 213 67 744 0 219 0 739 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 64 13 11 174 0 30 0 25 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1794 622 720 2701 0 865 17 1398 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1794 622 720 2701 0 865 17 1398 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1794 622 720 2701 0 865 17 1398 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1794 622 720 2701 0 865 17 1398 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.38 0.01 1.61 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2410 26 2816 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.19 0.36 0.23 0.47 0.00 0.36 0.66 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 33.0 33.0 21.2 54.2 0.0 60.8 60.8 60.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.71 1.34 1.34 1.08 0.00 0.73 1.34 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 42.1 211.0 215.1 80.6 0.0 26.0 187 53.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 42.1 211.0 215.1 80.6 0.0 26.0 187 53.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D F F F A C F D-A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 13 48 29 43 0 21 86 44 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-28
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #7: De Anza Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 2853 742***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
900 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
17*** 1! Critical V/C:1.431 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):237.4 0
1603 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):110.9 0 0
LOS:F
Lanes:0 0 5 0 1
Final Vol:0 1870 643***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1248 396 642 1783 0 616 17 634 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1248 396 642 1783 0 616 17 634 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 558 234 89 896 0 254 0 944 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 64 13 11 174 0 30 0 25 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1870 643 742 2853 0 900 17 1603 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1870 643 742 2853 0 900 17 1603 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1870 643 742 2853 0 900 17 1603 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1870 643 742 2853 0 900 17 1603 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.36 0.01 1.63 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2371 23 2857 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.20 0.37 0.24 0.50 0.00 0.38 0.72 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 31.8 31.8 20.4 52.3 0.0 62.7 62.7 62.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.77 1.43 1.43 1.19 0.00 0.75 1.43 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 44.2 252.5 256.6 125 0.0 25.4 228 86.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 44.2 252.5 256.6 125 0.0 25.4 228 86.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D F F F A C F F A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 15 53 33 54 0 23 102 57 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-29
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #8: Stevens Creek Blvd and De Anza Blvd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:423 582 447***
Lanes:1 0 4 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
342*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 297
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
480 3 Critical V/C:0.883 2 764***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):49.6 0
98 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):45.8 2 313
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:525 2033***360
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 454 1929 190 303 518 193 215 335 57 244 592 179
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 454 1929 190 303 518 193 215 335 57 244 592 179
Added Vol: 33 86 113 104 47 81 86 80 15 21 56 93
App+Div: 38 18 57 40 17 149 41 65 26 48 116 25
Initial Fut: 525 2033 360 447 582 423 342 480 98 313 764 297
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 525 2033 360 447 582 423 342 480 98 313 764 297
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 525 2033 360 447 582 423 342 480 98 313 764 297
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 525 2033 360 447 582 423 342 480 98 313 764 297
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.11 0.89
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 7600 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 4008 1558
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.36 0.21 0.14 0.08 0.24 0.11 0.08 0.06 0.10 0.19 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 28.6 50.1 50.1 19.9 41.4 41.4 15.2 19.3 19.3 22.7 26.8 26.8
Volume/Cap: 0.72 0.88 0.51 0.88 0.23 0.72 0.88 0.54 0.36 0.54 0.88 0.88
Delay/Veh: 47.7 38.7 28.4 67.5 29.8 40.7 74.1 49.0 47.7 47.0 55.1 55.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 47.7 38.7 28.4 67.5 29.8 40.7 74.1 49.0 47.7 47.0 55.1 55.1
LOS by Move: D D+ C E C D E D D D E+ E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 12 27 11 13 4 16 9 6 4 7 16 16
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-30
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #8: Stevens Creek Blvd and De Anza Blvd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:416 680 463***
Lanes:1 0 4 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
323*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 311
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
480 3 Critical V/C:0.890 2 775***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):50.1 0
143 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):46.0 2 330
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:528 2056***363
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 454 1929 190 303 518 193 215 335 57 244 592 179
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 454 1929 190 303 518 193 215 335 57 244 592 179
Added Vol: 36 109 116 120 145 74 67 80 60 38 67 107
App+Div: 38 18 57 40 17 149 41 65 26 48 116 25
Initial Fut: 528 2056 363 463 680 416 323 480 143 330 775 311
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 528 2056 363 463 680 416 323 480 143 330 775 311
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 528 2056 363 463 680 416 323 480 143 330 775 311
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 528 2056 363 463 680 416 323 480 143 330 775 311
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.11 0.89
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 7600 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3994 1603
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.36 0.21 0.15 0.09 0.24 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.19 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 29.2 50.2 50.2 20.5 41.5 41.5 14.3 18.4 18.4 22.9 27.0 27.0
Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.89 0.51 0.89 0.27 0.71 0.89 0.57 0.55 0.57 0.89 0.89
Delay/Veh: 46.7 39.1 28.3 67.9 30.2 40.1 76.8 50.0 51.5 47.4 55.5 55.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 46.7 39.1 28.3 67.9 30.2 40.1 76.8 50.0 51.5 47.4 55.5 55.5
LOS by Move: D D C E C D E-D D-D E+ E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 12 27 11 14 5 16 8 6 5 7 17 17
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-31
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #8: Stevens Creek Blvd and De Anza Blvd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:473 925 476***
Lanes:1 0 4 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
370*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 297
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
543 3 Critical V/C:0.933 2 803***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):55.3 0
282 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):50.3 2 382
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:590 2146***462
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 454 1929 190 303 518 193 215 335 57 244 592 179
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 454 1929 190 303 518 193 215 335 57 244 592 179
Added Vol: 98 199 215 133 390 131 114 143 199 90 95 93
App+Div: 38 18 57 40 17 149 41 65 26 48 116 25
Initial Fut: 590 2146 462 476 925 473 370 543 282 382 803 297
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 590 2146 462 476 925 473 370 543 282 382 803 297
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 590 2146 462 476 925 473 370 543 282 382 803 297
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 590 2146 462 476 925 473 370 543 282 382 803 297
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.14 0.86
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 7600 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 4067 1504
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.38 0.26 0.15 0.12 0.27 0.12 0.10 0.16 0.12 0.20 0.20
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 28.7 50.0 50.0 20.1 41.4 41.4 15.6 23.9 23.9 18.0 26.2 26.2
Volume/Cap: 0.81 0.93 0.65 0.93 0.36 0.81 0.93 0.49 0.84 0.84 0.93 0.93
Delay/Veh: 51.8 43.1 32.2 75.5 31.4 45.9 82.5 45.0 64.7 64.3 61.2 61.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 51.8 43.1 32.2 75.5 31.4 45.9 82.5 45.0 64.7 64.3 61.2 61.2
LOS by Move: D-D C-E-C D F D E E E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 15 30 16 15 7 20 10 6 12 11 18 18
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-32
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #8: Stevens Creek Blvd and De Anza Blvd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:475 1005 495***
Lanes:1 0 4 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
382*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 321
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
613 3 Critical V/C:0.962 2 838***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):60.4 0
289 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):53.6 2 403
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:594 2179***559
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 454 1929 190 303 518 193 215 335 57 244 592 179
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 454 1929 190 303 518 193 215 335 57 244 592 179
Added Vol: 102 232 312 152 470 133 126 213 206 111 130 117
App+Div: 38 18 57 40 17 149 41 65 26 48 116 25
Initial Fut: 594 2179 559 495 1005 475 382 613 289 403 838 321
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 594 2179 559 495 1005 475 382 613 289 403 838 321
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 594 2179 559 495 1005 475 382 613 289 403 838 321
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 594 2179 559 495 1005 475 382 613 289 403 838 321
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.12 0.88
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 7600 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 4026 1542
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.38 0.32 0.16 0.13 0.27 0.12 0.11 0.17 0.13 0.21 0.21
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 28.5 49.3 49.3 20.3 41.0 41.0 15.6 23.9 23.9 18.5 26.8 26.8
Volume/Cap: 0.82 0.96 0.80 0.96 0.40 0.82 0.96 0.56 0.86 0.86 0.96 0.96
Delay/Veh: 52.7 47.8 39.8 81.6 32.1 47.2 89.1 45.9 67.2 65.7 65.6 65.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 52.7 47.8 39.8 81.6 32.1 47.2 89.1 45.9 67.2 65.7 65.6 65.6
LOS by Move: D-D D F C-D F D E E E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 15 32 22 16 7 20 10 7 12 12 20 20
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-33
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #9: De Anza Blvd and McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:71 608 86***
Lanes:0 1 3 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
252 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 80
1
Loss Time (sec):10
1
58 0 Critical V/C:0.749 0 79***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):28.6 0
226*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):33.0 2 58
LOS:C-
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:501 2310***93
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 436 2053 69 49 498 60 226 49 215 33 75 36
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 436 2053 69 49 498 60 226 49 215 33 75 36
Added Vol: 3 185 23 27 54 2 15 9 5 25 4 33
App+Div: 62 72 1 10 56 9 11 0 6 0 0 11
Initial Fut: 501 2310 93 86 608 71 252 58 226 58 79 80
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 501 2310 93 86 608 71 252 58 226 58 79 80
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 501 2310 93 86 608 71 252 58 226 58 79 80
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 501 2310 93 86 608 71 252 58 226 58 79 80
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.87 0.13 1.00 3.55 0.45 1.65 0.35 1.00 2.00 0.48 0.52
Final Sat.: 1750 5461 220 1750 6745 788 2888 665 1750 3150 905 916
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.29 0.42 0.42 0.05 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.13 0.02 0.09 0.09
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 59.4 70.0 70.0 8.1 18.7 18.7 21.4 21.4 21.4 14.5 14.5 14.5
Volume/Cap: 0.60 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.60 0.60 0.51 0.51 0.75 0.16 0.75 0.75
Delay/Veh: 24.7 21.4 21.4 80.5 50.0 50.0 47.2 47.2 58.7 49.5 66.7 66.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 24.7 21.4 21.4 80.5 50.0 50.0 47.2 47.2 58.7 49.5 66.7 66.7
LOS by Move: C C+ C+ F D D D D E+ D E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 15 24 24 5 7 7 6 6 10 1 8 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-34
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #9: De Anza Blvd and McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:70 631 80***
Lanes:0 1 3 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
248 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 76***
1
Loss Time (sec):10
1
59 0 Critical V/C:0.755 0 79
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):28.2 0
226*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):32.8 2 57
LOS:C-
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:501 2323***102
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 436 2053 69 49 498 60 226 49 215 33 75 36
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 436 2053 69 49 498 60 226 49 215 33 75 36
Added Vol: 3 198 32 21 77 1 11 10 5 24 4 29
App+Div: 62 72 1 10 56 9 11 0 6 0 0 11
Initial Fut: 501 2323 102 80 631 70 248 59 226 57 79 76
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 501 2323 102 80 631 70 248 59 226 57 79 76
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 501 2323 102 80 631 70 248 59 226 57 79 76
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 501 2323 102 80 631 70 248 59 226 57 79 76
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.93 0.95 0.92 0.83 0.95 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.87 0.13 1.00 3.58 0.42 1.62 0.38 1.00 2.00 0.51 0.49
Final Sat.: 1750 5364 236 1750 6750 749 2868 682 1750 3150 917 883
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.29 0.43 0.43 0.05 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.13 0.02 0.09 0.09
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 59.3 71.1 71.1 7.5 19.4 19.4 21.2 21.2 21.2 14.1 14.1 14.1
Volume/Cap: 0.60 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.60 0.60 0.51 0.51 0.75 0.16 0.75 0.75
Delay/Veh: 24.9 20.9 20.9 83.4 49.6 49.6 47.3 47.3 59.4 49.8 67.9 67.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 24.9 20.9 20.9 83.4 49.6 49.6 47.3 47.3 59.4 49.8 67.9 67.9
LOS by Move: C C+ C+ F D D D D E+ D E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 15 24 24 5 7 7 6 6 11 1 8 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-35
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #9: De Anza Blvd and McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:70 743 108***
Lanes:0 1 3 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
250 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 96***
1
Loss Time (sec):10
1
67 0 Critical V/C:0.817 0 81
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):31.8 0
229*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):35.4 2 70
LOS:D+
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:503 2504***115
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 436 2053 69 49 498 60 226 49 215 33 75 36
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 436 2053 69 49 498 60 226 49 215 33 75 36
Added Vol: 5 379 45 49 189 1 13 18 8 37 6 49
App+Div: 62 72 1 10 56 9 11 0 6 0 0 11
Initial Fut: 503 2504 115 108 743 70 250 67 229 70 81 96
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 503 2504 115 108 743 70 250 67 229 70 81 96
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 503 2504 115 108 743 70 250 67 229 70 81 96
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 503 2504 115 108 743 70 250 67 229 70 81 96
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.86 0.14 1.00 3.63 0.37 1.60 0.40 1.00 2.00 0.44 0.56
Final Sat.: 1750 5429 249 1750 6895 650 2807 752 1750 3150 831 985
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.29 0.46 0.46 0.06 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.13 0.02 0.10 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 57.7 70.0 70.0 9.4 21.6 21.6 19.9 19.9 19.9 14.8 14.8 14.8
Volume/Cap: 0.62 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.62 0.62 0.56 0.56 0.82 0.19 0.82 0.82
Delay/Veh: 26.3 23.6 23.6 87.7 48.2 48.2 49.2 49.2 67.2 49.4 74.2 74.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 26.3 23.6 23.6 87.7 48.2 48.2 49.2 49.2 67.2 49.4 74.2 74.2
LOS by Move: C C C F D D D D E D E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 16 28 28 7 8 8 7 7 11 2 9 9
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-36
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #9: De Anza Blvd and McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:71 776 163***
Lanes:0 1 3 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
251 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 103
1
Loss Time (sec):10
1
78 0 Critical V/C:0.887 0 83***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):37.9 0
229*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):39.3 2 74
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:503 2627***146
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 436 2053 69 49 498 60 226 49 215 33 75 36
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 436 2053 69 49 498 60 226 49 215 33 75 36
Added Vol: 5 502 76 104 222 2 14 29 8 41 8 56
App+Div: 62 72 1 10 56 9 11 0 6 0 0 11
Initial Fut: 503 2627 146 163 776 71 251 78 229 74 83 103
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 503 2627 146 163 776 71 251 78 229 74 83 103
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 503 2627 146 163 776 71 251 78 229 74 83 103
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 503 2627 146 163 776 71 251 78 229 74 83 103
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.83 0.17 1.00 3.64 0.36 1.55 0.45 1.00 2.00 0.43 0.57
Final Sat.: 1750 5376 299 1750 6913 633 2721 846 1750 3150 809 1004
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.29 0.49 0.49 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.13 0.02 0.10 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 58.5 68.3 68.3 13.0 22.9 22.9 18.3 18.3 18.3 14.3 14.3 14.3
Volume/Cap: 0.61 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.61 0.61 0.63 0.63 0.89 0.20 0.89 0.89
Delay/Veh: 25.6 27.9 27.9 91.3 47.3 47.3 52.0 52.0 80.4 49.9 87.3 87.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 25.6 27.9 27.9 91.3 47.3 47.3 52.0 52.0 80.4 49.9 87.3 87.3
LOS by Move: C C C F D D D-D-F D F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 15 34 34 10 8 8 7 7 12 2 10 10
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-37
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #10: De Anza Blvd and Bollinger Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:113 692 334***
Lanes:0 1 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
114*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 469***
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
69 0 Critical V/C:0.904 1 115
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):48.2 0
14 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):44.0 1 176
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:47 2116***184
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 47 1870 174 323 555 105 111 69 14 170 115 414
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 47 1870 174 323 555 105 111 69 14 170 115 414
Added Vol: 0 164 6 2 91 0 0 0 0 1 0 6
App+Div: 0 82 4 9 46 8 3 0 0 5 0 49
Initial Fut: 47 2116 184 334 692 113 114 69 14 176 115 469
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 47 2116 184 334 692 113 114 69 14 176 115 469
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 47 2116 184 334 692 113 114 69 14 176 115 469
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 47 2116 184 334 692 113 114 69 14 176 115 469
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.74 0.26 2.00 3.40 0.60 2.00 0.82 0.18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 5208 453 3150 6455 1054 3150 1557 316 1750 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.41 0.41 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.10 0.06 0.27
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.8 54.7 54.7 14.3 45.2 45.2 7.0 19.2 19.2 23.9 36.1 36.1
Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.29 0.29 0.64 0.29 0.29 0.52 0.21 0.92
Delay/Veh: 41.8 38.9 38.9 82.6 28.1 28.1 65.0 46.9 46.9 46.4 33.4 64.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.8 38.9 38.9 82.6 28.1 28.1 65.0 46.9 46.9 46.4 33.4 64.9
LOS by Move: D D+ D+ F C C E D D D C-E
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 29 29 11 5 5 4 3 3 7 3 23
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-38
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #10: De Anza Blvd and Bollinger Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:113 702 333***
Lanes:0 1 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
114*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 469***
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
69 0 Critical V/C:0.916 1 115
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):49.5 0
14 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):44.9 1 176
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:47 2153***184
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 47 1870 174 323 555 105 111 69 14 170 115 414
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 47 1870 174 323 555 105 111 69 14 170 115 414
Added Vol: 0 201 6 1 101 0 0 0 0 1 0 6
App+Div: 0 82 4 9 46 8 3 0 0 5 0 49
Initial Fut: 47 2153 184 333 702 113 114 69 14 176 115 469
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 47 2153 184 333 702 113 114 69 14 176 115 469
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 47 2153 184 333 702 113 114 69 14 176 115 469
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 47 2153 184 333 702 113 114 69 14 176 115 469
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.76 0.24 2.00 3.42 0.58 2.00 0.83 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 5159 441 3150 6458 1040 3150 1496 304 1750 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.42 0.42 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.06 0.27
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.7 55.4 55.4 14.0 45.7 45.7 7.0 18.9 18.9 23.6 35.6 35.6
Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.29 0.29 0.64 0.30 0.30 0.53 0.21 0.93
Delay/Veh: 41.9 39.9 39.9 85.8 27.8 27.8 65.0 47.3 47.3 46.8 33.8 67.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.9 39.9 39.9 85.8 27.8 27.8 65.0 47.3 47.3 46.8 33.8 67.9
LOS by Move: D D D F C C E D D D C-E
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 30 30 11 5 5 4 3 3 7 3 23
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-39
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #10: De Anza Blvd and Bollinger Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:113 778 334***
Lanes:0 1 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
114*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 470***
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
69 0 Critical V/C:0.941 1 115
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):52.9 0
14 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):47.1 1 165
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:47 2319***170
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 47 1870 174 323 555 105 111 69 14 170 115 414
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 47 1870 174 323 555 105 111 69 14 170 115 414
Added Vol: 0 367 -8 2 177 0 0 0 0 -10 0 7
App+Div: 0 82 4 9 46 8 3 0 0 5 0 49
Initial Fut: 47 2319 170 334 778 113 114 69 14 165 115 470
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 47 2319 170 334 778 113 114 69 14 165 115 470
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 47 2319 170 334 778 113 114 69 14 165 115 470
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 47 2319 170 334 778 113 114 69 14 165 115 470
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.78 0.22 2.00 3.46 0.54 2.00 0.82 0.18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 5280 387 3150 6565 953 3150 1557 316 1750 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.44 0.44 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.09 0.06 0.27
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 22.7 56.7 56.7 13.7 47.7 47.7 7.0 19.2 19.2 22.4 34.7 34.7
Volume/Cap: 0.15 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.31 0.31 0.64 0.29 0.29 0.52 0.22 0.96
Delay/Veh: 42.7 42.8 42.8 92.8 26.7 26.7 65.0 46.9 46.9 47.5 34.5 74.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 42.7 42.8 42.8 92.8 26.7 26.7 65.0 46.9 46.9 47.5 34.5 74.9
LOS by Move: D D D F C C E D D D C-E
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 33 33 11 6 6 4 3 3 7 3 24
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-40
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #10: De Anza Blvd and Bollinger Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:113 817 334***
Lanes:0 1 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
114*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 470***
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
69 0 Critical V/C:0.971 1 115
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):58.9 0
14 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):51.4 1 167
LOS:D-
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:47 2469***176
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 47 1870 174 323 555 105 111 69 14 170 115 414
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 47 1870 174 323 555 105 111 69 14 170 115 414
Added Vol: 0 517 -2 2 216 0 0 0 0 -8 0 7
App+Div: 0 82 4 9 46 8 3 0 0 5 0 49
Initial Fut: 47 2469 176 334 817 113 114 69 14 167 115 470
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 47 2469 176 334 817 113 114 69 14 167 115 470
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 47 2469 176 334 817 113 114 69 14 167 115 470
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 47 2469 176 334 817 113 114 69 14 167 115 470
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.78 0.22 2.00 3.48 0.52 2.00 0.82 0.18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 5291 377 3150 6608 914 3150 1557 316 1750 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.47 0.47 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.10 0.06 0.27
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 22.4 58.2 58.2 13.2 49.1 49.1 7.0 18.6 18.6 22.0 33.5 33.5
Volume/Cap: 0.15 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.31 0.31 0.64 0.30 0.30 0.54 0.22 0.99
Delay/Veh: 43.0 48.6 48.6 102.6 25.9 25.9 65.0 47.5 47.5 48.3 35.4 84.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 43.0 48.6 48.6 102.6 25.9 25.9 65.0 47.5 47.5 48.3 35.4 84.7
LOS by Move: D D D F C C E D D D D+ F
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 37 37 12 6 6 4 3 3 7 3 25
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-41
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #11: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:262 833***0
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 917
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.789 1!15***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):42.6 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):32.9 1 132
LOS:C-
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:718***2045 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 693 1914 0 0 711 262 0 0 0 130 15 820
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 693 1914 0 0 711 262 0 0 0 130 15 820
Added Vol: 25 87 0 0 92 0 0 0 0 2 0 83
App+Div: 0 44 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
Initial Fut: 718 2045 0 0 833 262 0 0 0 132 15 917
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 718 2045 0 0 833 262 0 0 0 132 15 917
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 718 2045 0 0 833 262 0 0 0 132 15 917
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 718 2045 0 0 833 262 0 0 0 132 15 917
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.24 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.12 0.03 1.85
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 4249 1336 0 0 0 1965 49 3241
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.31 0.28
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 35.8 66.6 0.0 0.0 30.8 30.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.4 48.4 48.4
Volume/Cap: 0.79 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.79 0.73
Delay/Veh: 45.3 21.3 0.0 0.0 46.7 46.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.7 36.5 34.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 45.3 21.3 0.0 0.0 46.7 46.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.7 36.5 34.0
LOS by Move: D C+ A A D D A A A C D+ C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 15 18 0 0 14 14 0 0 0 3 21 18
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-42
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #11: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:262 844***0
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 922
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.788 1!15***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):42.5 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):32.8 1 137
LOS:C-
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:723***2076 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 693 1914 0 0 711 262 0 0 0 130 15 820
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 693 1914 0 0 711 262 0 0 0 130 15 820
Added Vol: 30 118 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 7 0 88
App+Div: 0 44 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
Initial Fut: 723 2076 0 0 844 262 0 0 0 137 15 922
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 723 2076 0 0 844 262 0 0 0 137 15 922
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 723 2076 0 0 844 262 0 0 0 137 15 922
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 723 2076 0 0 844 262 0 0 0 137 15 922
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.26 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.13 0.03 1.84
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 4272 1326 0 0 0 1976 49 3319
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.30 0.28
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 36.1 67.2 0.0 0.0 31.1 31.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.8 47.8 47.8
Volume/Cap: 0.79 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.79 0.72
Delay/Veh: 45.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 46.4 46.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 36.8 34.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 45.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 46.4 46.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 36.8 34.2
LOS by Move: D C+ A A D D A A A C D+ C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 15 18 0 0 14 14 0 0 0 3 21 18
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-43
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #11: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:262 909***0
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 1011
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.843 1!15***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):45.2 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):35.1 1 145
LOS:D+
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:737***2139 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 693 1914 0 0 711 262 0 0 0 130 15 820
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 693 1914 0 0 711 262 0 0 0 130 15 820
Added Vol: 44 181 0 0 168 0 0 0 0 15 0 177
App+Div: 0 44 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
Initial Fut: 737 2139 0 0 909 262 0 0 0 145 15 1011
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 737 2139 0 0 909 262 0 0 0 145 15 1011
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 737 2139 0 0 909 262 0 0 0 145 15 1011
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 737 2139 0 0 909 262 0 0 0 145 15 1011
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.28 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.12 0.02 1.86
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 4341 1251 0 0 0 1964 44 3245
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.34 0.31
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 34.4 65.2 0.0 0.0 30.8 30.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.8 49.8 49.8
Volume/Cap: 0.84 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.84 0.78
Delay/Veh: 49.7 23.1 0.0 0.0 49.2 49.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.0 38.4 34.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 49.7 23.1 0.0 0.0 49.2 49.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.0 38.4 34.9
LOS by Move: D C A A D D A A A C D+ C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 16 20 0 0 15 15 0 0 0 3 24 21
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-44
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #11: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:262 949***0
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 1116
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.888 1!15***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):48.5 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):37.6 1 149
LOS:D+
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:750***2192 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 693 1914 0 0 711 262 0 0 0 130 15 820
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 693 1914 0 0 711 262 0 0 0 130 15 820
Added Vol: 57 234 0 0 208 0 0 0 0 19 0 282
App+Div: 0 44 0 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
Initial Fut: 750 2192 0 0 949 262 0 0 0 149 15 1116
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 750 2192 0 0 949 262 0 0 0 149 15 1116
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 750 2192 0 0 949 262 0 0 0 149 15 1116
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 750 2192 0 0 949 262 0 0 0 149 15 1116
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.31 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.12 0.02 1.86
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 4385 1211 0 0 0 1952 41 3261
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.24 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.37 0.34
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 33.2 63.4 0.0 0.0 30.2 30.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 51.6 51.6 51.6
Volume/Cap: 0.89 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.89 0.82
Delay/Veh: 55.0 25.2 0.0 0.0 52.8 52.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.9 40.7 35.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 55.0 25.2 0.0 0.0 52.8 52.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.9 40.7 35.9
LOS by Move: D-C A A D-D-A A A C+ D D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 16 21 0 0 16 16 0 0 0 3 28 24
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-45
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #12: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 613 352***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
264 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
2*** 1! Critical V/C:0.793 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):28.5 0
217 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):23.9 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:0 2499***247
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 2343 238 294 547 0 264 0 207 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 2343 238 294 547 0 264 0 207 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 112 9 44 50 0 0 2 10 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 44 0 14 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 2499 247 352 613 0 264 2 217 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2499 247 352 613 0 264 2 217 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2499 247 352 613 0 264 2 217 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2499 247 352 613 0 264 2 217 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.71 0.29 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.54 0.01 1.45 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5148 509 3150 5700 0 2703 14 2534 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.10 0.14 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 75.9 75.9 17.5 93.4 0.0 21.6 21.6 21.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.14 0.00 0.56 0.79 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 19.5 19.5 61.0 4.3 0.0 47.6 56.1 46.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 19.5 19.5 61.0 4.3 0.0 47.6 56.1 46.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A B-B-E A A D E+ D A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 27 27 8 2 0 7 12 6 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-46
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #12: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 637 344***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
264 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
2*** 1! Critical V/C:0.807 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):28.9 0
230 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):24.1 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:0 2535***248
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 2343 238 294 547 0 264 0 207 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 2343 238 294 547 0 264 0 207 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 148 10 36 74 0 0 2 23 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 44 0 14 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 2535 248 344 637 0 264 2 230 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2535 248 344 637 0 264 2 230 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2535 248 344 637 0 264 2 230 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2535 248 344 637 0 264 2 230 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.72 0.28 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.53 0.01 1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5100 499 3150 5700 0 2678 14 2558 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.10 0.14 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 76.4 76.4 16.8 93.1 0.0 21.9 21.9 21.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.15 0.00 0.56 0.81 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 19.7 19.7 62.9 4.3 0.0 47.5 56.8 46.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 19.7 19.7 62.9 4.3 0.0 47.5 56.8 46.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A B-B-E A A D E+ D A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 28 28 8 2 0 7 12 6 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-47
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #12: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 688 366***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
264 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
2*** 1! Critical V/C:0.833 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):30.6 0
258 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):25.3 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:0 2612***253
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 2343 238 294 547 0 264 0 207 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 2343 238 294 547 0 264 0 207 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 225 15 58 125 0 0 2 51 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 44 0 14 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 2612 253 366 688 0 264 2 258 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2612 253 366 688 0 264 2 258 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2612 253 366 688 0 264 2 258 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2612 253 366 688 0 264 2 258 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.71 0.29 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.50 0.01 1.49 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5158 500 3150 5700 0 2629 13 2609 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.10 0.15 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 75.4 75.4 17.3 92.7 0.0 22.3 22.3 22.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.16 0.00 0.56 0.83 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 21.2 21.2 64.8 4.5 0.0 47.1 58.4 46.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 21.2 21.2 64.8 4.5 0.0 47.1 58.4 46.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A C+ C+ E A A D E+ D A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 30 30 8 2 0 7 13 7 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-48
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #12: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 715 383***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
264 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
3*** 1! Critical V/C:0.856 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):32.1 0
269 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):26.2 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:0 2677***258
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 2343 238 294 547 0 264 0 207 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 2343 238 294 547 0 264 0 207 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 290 20 75 152 0 0 3 62 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 44 0 14 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 2677 258 383 715 0 264 3 269 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2677 258 383 715 0 264 3 269 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2677 258 383 715 0 264 3 269 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2677 258 383 715 0 264 3 269 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.72 0.28 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.49 0.01 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5160 497 3150 5700 0 2608 19 2624 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.52 0.52 0.12 0.13 0.00 0.10 0.15 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 75.1 75.1 17.6 92.7 0.0 22.3 22.3 22.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.17 0.00 0.56 0.86 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 22.4 22.4 67.0 4.5 0.0 47.2 60.6 47.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 22.4 22.4 67.0 4.5 0.0 47.2 60.6 47.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A C+ C+ E A A D E D A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 32 32 8 2 0 7 13 7 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-49
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #13: Homestead Road and Blaney Road/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:1 2***2
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Permit Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 1
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
798*** 1 Critical V/C:0.696 1 819
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):41.2 0
142 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):34.9 1 137***
LOS:C-
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol:549***1 307
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Road/Driveway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 494 1 235 2 2 1 0 559 116 126 776 1
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 494 1 235 2 2 1 0 559 116 126 776 1
Added Vol: 45 0 65 0 0 0 0 228 21 10 33 0
App+Div: 10 0 7 0 0 0 0 11 5 1 10 0
Initial Fut: 549 1 307 2 2 1 0 798 142 137 819 1
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 549 1 307 2 2 1 0 798 142 137 819 1
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 549 1 307 2 2 1 0 798 142 137 819 1
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 549 1 307 2 2 1 0 798 142 137 819 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.99 0.01 1.00 0.41 0.38 0.21 0.00 1.68 0.32 1.00 1.99 0.01
Final Sat.: 1747 3 1750 723 723 361 0 3185 567 1750 3795 5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.31 0.31 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.22 0.22
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 51.3 51.3 51.3 10.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 40.9 40.9 12.8 53.7 53.7
Volume/Cap: 0.76 0.76 0.42 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.50 0.50
Delay/Veh: 35.8 35.8 26.2 52.6 52.6 52.6 0.0 39.9 39.9 71.1 25.7 25.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 35.8 35.8 26.2 52.6 52.6 52.6 0.0 39.9 39.9 71.1 25.7 25.7
LOS by Move: D+ D+ C D-D-D-A D D E C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 20 20 9 0 0 0 0 17 17 7 11 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-50
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #13: Homestead Road and Blaney Road/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:1 2***2
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Permit Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 1
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
806*** 1 Critical V/C:0.694 1 823
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):40.8 0
145 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):34.6 1 137***
LOS:C-
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol:548***1 307
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Road/Driveway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 494 1 235 2 2 1 0 559 116 126 776 1
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 494 1 235 2 2 1 0 559 116 126 776 1
Added Vol: 44 0 65 0 0 0 0 236 24 10 37 0
App+Div: 10 0 7 0 0 0 0 11 5 1 10 0
Initial Fut: 548 1 307 2 2 1 0 806 145 137 823 1
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 548 1 307 2 2 1 0 806 145 137 823 1
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 548 1 307 2 2 1 0 806 145 137 823 1
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 548 1 307 2 2 1 0 806 145 137 823 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.97 0.95
Lanes: 0.99 0.01 1.00 0.40 0.40 0.20 0.00 1.69 0.31 1.00 1.99 0.01
Final Sat.: 1797 3 1750 700 700 350 0 3135 564 1750 3696 4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.31 0.30 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.08 0.22 0.22
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 50.0 50.0 50.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 42.2 42.2 12.8 55.0 55.0
Volume/Cap: 0.76 0.76 0.43 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.50 0.50
Delay/Veh: 36.3 36.3 27.2 52.7 52.7 52.7 0.0 39.0 39.0 70.6 25.0 25.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 36.3 36.3 27.2 52.7 52.7 52.7 0.0 39.0 39.0 70.6 25.0 25.0
LOS by Move: D+ D+ C D-D-D-A D D E C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 20 20 9 0 0 0 0 18 18 7 11 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-51
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #13: Homestead Road and Blaney Road/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:1 2***2
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Permit Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 1
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
949*** 1 Critical V/C:0.838 1 918
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):54.1 0
156 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):43.9 1 143***
LOS:D
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol:697***1 320
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Road/Driveway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 494 1 235 2 2 1 0 559 116 126 776 1
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 494 1 235 2 2 1 0 559 116 126 776 1
Added Vol: 193 0 78 0 0 0 0 379 35 16 132 0
App+Div: 10 0 7 0 0 0 0 11 5 1 10 0
Initial Fut: 697 1 320 2 2 1 0 949 156 143 918 1
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 697 1 320 2 2 1 0 949 156 143 918 1
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 697 1 320 2 2 1 0 949 156 143 918 1
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 697 1 320 2 2 1 0 949 156 143 918 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.99 0.01 1.00 0.41 0.38 0.21 0.00 1.70 0.30 1.00 1.99 0.01
Final Sat.: 1748 3 1750 723 723 361 0 3225 530 1750 3796 4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.40 0.40 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.08 0.24 0.24
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 54.0 54.0 54.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 39.9 39.9 11.1 51.0 51.0
Volume/Cap: 0.92 0.92 0.42 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.59 0.59
Delay/Veh: 48.4 48.4 24.5 52.6 52.6 52.6 0.0 51.2 51.2 103.7 29.0 29.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 48.4 48.4 24.5 52.6 52.6 52.6 0.0 51.2 51.2 103.7 29.0 29.0
LOS by Move: D D C D-D-D-A D-D-F C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 31 31 9 0 0 0 0 24 24 9 14 14
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-52
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #13: Homestead Road and Blaney Road/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:1 2***2
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Permit Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 1
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
996*** 1 Critical V/C:0.901 1 936
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):67.7 0
161 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):52.9 1 147***
LOS:D-
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol:770 1***330
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Road/Driveway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 494 1 235 2 2 1 0 559 116 126 776 1
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 494 1 235 2 2 1 0 559 116 126 776 1
Added Vol: 266 0 88 0 0 0 0 426 40 20 150 0
App+Div: 10 0 7 0 0 0 0 11 5 1 10 0
Initial Fut: 770 1 330 2 2 1 0 996 161 147 936 1
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 770 1 330 2 2 1 0 996 161 147 936 1
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 770 1 330 2 2 1 0 996 161 147 936 1
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 770 1 330 2 2 1 0 996 161 147 936 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.99 0.01 1.00 0.41 0.38 0.21 0.00 1.70 0.30 1.00 1.99 0.01
Final Sat.: 1748 2 1750 723 723 361 0 3233 523 1750 3796 4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.44 0.44 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.08 0.25 0.25
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 55.6 55.6 55.6 10.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 38.9 38.9 10.6 49.4 49.4
Volume/Cap: 0.98 0.98 0.42 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.62 0.62
Delay/Veh: 61.7 61.7 23.6 52.6 52.6 52.6 0.0 64.4 64.4 125.0 30.5 30.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 61.7 61.7 23.6 52.6 52.6 52.6 0.0 64.4 64.4 125.0 30.5 30.5
LOS by Move: E E C D-D-D-A E E F C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 38 38 9 0 0 0 0 28 28 10 14 14
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-53
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #14: El Camino Real and Wolfe Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:9 640 102***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
63 1
Cycle Time (sec):150
1 207
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
342 3 Critical V/C:0.760 3 809
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):50.5 0
308*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):47.6 2 467***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:389 1203***30
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road El Camino Real
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 325 1082 27 90 514 8 58 263 229 421 685 191
Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 351 1169 29 97 555 9 63 284 247 455 740 206
Added Vol: 4 23 0 5 45 0 0 6 35 10 1 1
App+Div: 34 11 1 0 40 0 0 52 26 2 68 0
Initial Fut: 389 1203 30 102 640 9 63 342 308 467 809 207
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 389 1203 30 102 640 9 63 342 308 467 809 207
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 389 1203 30 102 640 9 63 342 308 467 809 207
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 389 1203 30 102 640 9 63 342 308 467 809 207
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 1750 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.32 0.02 0.06 0.11 0.00 0.04 0.06 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 38.7 62.5 62.5 11.5 35.2 51.1 15.8 34.8 34.8 29.2 48.2 48.2
Volume/Cap: 0.48 0.76 0.04 0.76 0.48 0.01 0.34 0.26 0.76 0.76 0.44 0.37
Delay/Veh: 47.5 39.6 26.0 89.9 49.7 32.8 63.3 47.2 61.9 62.6 40.5 39.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 47.5 39.6 26.0 89.9 49.7 32.8 63.3 47.2 61.9 62.6 40.5 39.6
LOS by Move: D D C F D C-E D E E D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 23 1 7 9 0 3 4 16 14 10 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-54
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #14: El Camino Real and Wolfe Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:9 653 102***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
63 1
Cycle Time (sec):150
1 207
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
342 3 Critical V/C:0.760 3 809
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):50.5 0
308*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):47.6 2 467***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:389 1203***30
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road El Camino Real
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 325 1082 27 90 514 8 58 263 229 421 685 191
Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 351 1169 29 97 555 9 63 284 247 455 740 206
Added Vol: 4 23 0 5 58 0 0 6 35 10 1 1
App+Div: 34 11 1 0 40 0 0 52 26 2 68 0
Initial Fut: 389 1203 30 102 653 9 63 342 308 467 809 207
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 389 1203 30 102 653 9 63 342 308 467 809 207
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 389 1203 30 102 653 9 63 342 308 467 809 207
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 389 1203 30 102 653 9 63 342 308 467 809 207
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 1750 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.32 0.02 0.06 0.11 0.00 0.04 0.06 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 38.4 62.5 62.5 11.5 35.6 51.5 15.8 34.8 34.8 29.2 48.2 48.2
Volume/Cap: 0.48 0.76 0.04 0.76 0.48 0.01 0.34 0.26 0.76 0.76 0.44 0.37
Delay/Veh: 47.8 39.6 26.0 89.9 49.5 32.5 63.3 47.2 61.9 62.6 40.5 39.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 47.8 39.6 26.0 89.9 49.5 32.5 63.3 47.2 61.9 62.6 40.5 39.6
LOS by Move: D D C F D C-E D E E D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 23 1 7 9 0 3 4 16 14 10 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-55
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #14: El Camino Real and Wolfe Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:9 701 102***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
63 1
Cycle Time (sec):150
1 207
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
342 3 Critical V/C:0.770 3 809
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):50.9 0
313*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):47.8 2 467***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:390 1226***30
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road El Camino Real
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 325 1082 27 90 514 8 58 263 229 421 685 191
Growth Adj:1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 351 1169 29 97 555 9 63 284 247 455 740 206
Added Vol: 5 46 0 5 106 0 0 6 40 10 1 1
App+Div: 34 11 1 0 40 0 0 52 26 2 68 0
Initial Fut: 390 1226 30 102 701 9 63 342 313 467 809 207
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 390 1226 30 102 701 9 63 342 313 467 809 207
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 390 1226 30 102 701 9 63 342 313 467 809 207
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 390 1226 30 102 701 9 63 342 313 467 809 207
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 1750 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.32 0.02 0.06 0.12 0.00 0.04 0.06 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 37.2 62.9 62.9 11.4 37.0 52.8 15.8 34.9 34.9 28.9 48.0 48.0
Volume/Cap: 0.50 0.77 0.04 0.77 0.50 0.01 0.34 0.26 0.77 0.77 0.44 0.37
Delay/Veh: 48.9 39.7 25.8 91.6 48.8 31.7 63.4 47.1 62.5 63.4 40.6 39.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 48.9 39.7 25.8 91.6 48.8 31.7 63.4 47.1 62.5 63.4 40.6 39.8
LOS by Move: D D C F D C E D E E D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 23 1 7 9 0 3 4 16 14 10 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-56
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #14: El Camino Real and Wolfe Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:9 735 102***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
63 1
Cycle Time (sec):150
1 207
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
342 3 Critical V/C:0.776 3 809
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):51.2 0
319*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):48.0 2 467***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:392 1236***30
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road El Camino Real
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 325 1082 27 90 514 8 58 263 229 421 685 191
Growth Adj:1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 351 1169 29 97 555 9 63 284 247 455 740 206
Added Vol: 7 56 0 5 140 0 0 6 46 10 1 1
App+Div: 34 11 1 0 40 0 0 52 26 2 68 0
Initial Fut: 392 1236 30 102 735 9 63 342 319 467 809 207
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 392 1236 30 102 735 9 63 342 319 467 809 207
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 392 1236 30 102 735 9 63 342 319 467 809 207
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 392 1236 30 102 735 9 63 342 319 467 809 207
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 1750 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.33 0.02 0.06 0.13 0.00 0.04 0.06 0.18 0.15 0.14 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 36.4 62.8 62.8 11.3 37.7 53.5 15.8 35.3 35.3 28.6 48.1 48.1
Volume/Cap: 0.51 0.78 0.04 0.78 0.51 0.01 0.34 0.26 0.78 0.78 0.44 0.37
Delay/Veh: 49.7 40.0 25.8 92.8 48.6 31.2 63.4 46.8 62.7 64.0 40.5 39.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 49.7 40.0 25.8 92.8 48.6 31.2 63.4 46.8 62.7 64.0 40.5 39.7
LOS by Move: D D C F D C E D E E D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 24 1 7 10 0 3 4 16 14 10 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-57
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #15: Wolfe Road and Fremont Ave (SUN)
Signal=Perm+Prot/Rights=Include
Final Vol:435 967***16
Lanes:0 1 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
401*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):150
0 55
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
263 2 Critical V/C:0.628 0 37***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):41.8 0
226 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):45.8 1 16
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:225***1165 58
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Fremont Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 186 1013 48 15 746 403 370 234 162 11 25 51
Growth Adj:1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 201 1094 52 16 806 435 400 253 175 12 27 55
Added Vol: 9 26 6 0 89 0 1 9 41 3 10 0
App+Div: 15 45 0 0 72 0 0 1 10 1 0 0
Initial Fut: 225 1165 58 16 967 435 401 263 226 16 37 55
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 225 1165 58 16 967 435 401 263 226 16 37 55
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 225 1165 58 16 967 435 401 263 226 16 37 55
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 225 1165 58 16 967 435 401 263 226 16 37 55
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.85 0.15 0.04 1.99 0.97 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.38 0.62
Final Sat.: 1750 5408 269 63 3782 1703 3150 3800 1750 1750 726 1081
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.13 0.07 0.13 0.01 0.05 0.05
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 33.5 45.8 45.8 57.3 66.6 66.6 27.0 27.8 27.8 10.1 10.8 10.8
Volume/Cap: 0.58 0.71 0.71 0.67 0.58 0.58 0.71 0.37 0.70 0.14 0.71 0.71
Delay/Veh: 54.0 47.5 47.5 39.3 31.5 31.5 61.8 53.8 63.6 66.4 84.2 84.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 54.0 47.5 47.5 39.3 31.5 31.5 61.8 53.8 63.6 66.4 84.2 84.2
LOS by Move: D-D D D C C E D-E E F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 10 16 16 18 16 16 12 5 12 1 6 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-58
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #15: Wolfe Road and Fremont Ave (SUN)
Signal=Perm+Prot/Rights=Include
Final Vol:435 980***16
Lanes:0 1 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
401*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):150
0 55
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
268 2 Critical V/C:0.633 0 42***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):42.0 0
230 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):46.1 1 21
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:224***1165 59
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Fremont Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 186 1013 48 15 746 403 370 234 162 11 25 51
Growth Adj:1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 201 1094 52 16 806 435 400 253 175 12 27 55
Added Vol: 8 26 7 0 102 0 1 14 45 8 15 0
App+Div: 15 45 0 0 72 0 0 1 10 1 0 0
Initial Fut: 224 1165 59 16 980 435 401 268 230 21 42 55
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 224 1165 59 16 980 435 401 268 230 21 42 55
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 224 1165 59 16 980 435 401 268 230 21 42 55
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 224 1165 59 16 980 435 401 268 230 21 42 55
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.85 0.15 0.03 2.04 0.93 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.43 0.57
Final Sat.: 1750 5330 269 62 3764 1672 3150 3800 1750 1750 779 1021
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.13 0.07 0.13 0.01 0.05 0.05
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 33.0 45.7 45.7 57.4 67.1 67.1 26.6 27.9 27.9 9.9 11.3 11.3
Volume/Cap: 0.58 0.72 0.72 0.68 0.58 0.58 0.72 0.38 0.71 0.18 0.72 0.72
Delay/Veh: 54.6 47.9 47.9 39.5 31.3 31.3 62.6 53.8 64.0 66.9 84.6 84.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 54.6 47.9 47.9 39.5 31.3 31.3 62.6 53.8 64.0 66.9 84.6 84.6
LOS by Move: D-D D D C C E D-E E F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 16 16 19 16 16 12 5 12 1 6 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-59
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #15: Wolfe Road and Fremont Ave (SUN)
Signal=Perm+Prot/Rights=Include
Final Vol:436 1032***16
Lanes:0 1 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
402*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):150
0 55
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
273 2 Critical V/C:0.644 0 55***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):42.6 0
254 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):46.9 1 25
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:229***1188 61
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Fremont Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 186 1013 48 15 746 403 370 234 162 11 25 51
Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 201 1094 52 16 806 435 400 253 175 12 27 55
Added Vol: 13 49 9 0 154 1 2 19 69 12 28 0
App+Div: 15 45 0 0 72 0 0 1 10 1 0 0
Initial Fut: 229 1188 61 16 1032 436 402 273 254 25 55 55
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 229 1188 61 16 1032 436 402 273 254 25 55 55
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 229 1188 61 16 1032 436 402 273 254 25 55 55
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 229 1188 61 16 1032 436 402 273 254 25 55 55
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.84 0.16 0.03 2.04 0.93 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.48 0.52
Final Sat.: 1750 5400 277 61 3861 1633 3150 3800 1750 1750 910 912
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.13 0.07 0.15 0.01 0.06 0.06
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 32.7 45.0 45.0 57.6 66.9 66.9 26.1 29.1 29.1 9.3 12.4 12.4
Volume/Cap: 0.60 0.73 0.73 0.70 0.60 0.60 0.73 0.37 0.75 0.23 0.73 0.73
Delay/Veh: 55.4 48.8 48.8 39.8 31.9 31.9 63.8 52.8 66.0 68.0 84.2 84.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 55.4 48.8 48.8 39.8 31.9 31.9 63.8 52.8 66.0 68.0 84.2 84.2
LOS by Move: E+ D D D C C E D-E E F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 10 17 17 19 17 17 12 6 13 1 7 7
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-60
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #15: Wolfe Road and Fremont Ave (SUN)
Signal=Perm+Prot/Rights=Include
Final Vol:436 1072***16
Lanes:0 1 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
402 2
Cycle Time (sec):150
0 55
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
277 2 Critical V/C:0.673 0 63
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):40.3 0
284*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):47.4 1 29***
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:238***1199 66
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Fremont Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 186 1013 48 15 746 403 370 234 162 11 25 51
Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 201 1094 52 16 806 435 400 253 175 12 27 55
Added Vol: 22 60 14 0 194 1 2 23 99 16 36 0
App+Div: 15 45 0 0 72 0 0 1 10 1 0 0
Initial Fut: 238 1199 66 16 1072 436 402 277 284 29 63 55
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 238 1199 66 16 1072 436 402 277 284 29 63 55
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 238 1199 66 16 1072 436 402 277 284 29 63 55
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 238 1199 66 16 1072 436 402 277 284 29 63 55
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.83 0.17 0.03 2.06 0.91 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.51 0.49
Final Sat.: 1750 5379 295 59 3908 1591 3150 3800 1750 1750 975 852
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.13 0.07 0.16 0.02 0.06 0.06
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 32.7 44.3 44.3 57.5 66.0 66.0 25.8 32.2 32.2 7.0 13.5 13.5
Volume/Cap: 0.62 0.75 0.75 0.72 0.62 0.62 0.74 0.34 0.75 0.35 0.72 0.72
Delay/Veh: 56.2 49.9 49.9 40.5 32.9 32.9 64.4 50.1 63.6 71.9 80.8 80.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 56.2 49.9 49.9 40.5 32.9 32.9 64.4 50.1 63.6 71.9 80.8 80.8
LOS by Move: E+ D D D C-C-E D E E F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 10 17 17 20 18 18 12 5 15 2 7 7
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 10:30:36 2014 Page 10-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #18: Wolfe Road and Homestead Road (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:121 925 255***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
131 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
0 228
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
543 2 Critical V/C:0.734 1 595
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):39.8 0
455*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):36.3 2 599***
LOS:D+
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:292 819***546
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 264 826 193 141 774 117 126 463 181 257 545 109
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 264 826 193 141 774 117 126 463 181 257 545 109
Added Vol: 24 40 154 57 110 0 0 96 198 178 19 7
App+Div: 4 -47 199 57 41 4 5 -16 76 164 31 112
Initial Fut: 292 819 546 255 925 121 131 543 455 599 595 228
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 292 819 546 255 925 121 131 543 455 599 595 228
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 292 819 546 255 925 121 131 543 455 599 595 228
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 292 819 546 255 925 121 131 543 455 599 595 228
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.63 0.37 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.41 0.59
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 3150 4991 653 1750 3800 1750 3150 2684 1028
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.22 0.31 0.08 0.19 0.19 0.07 0.14 0.26 0.19 0.22 0.22
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 14.8 32.3 60.8 12.1 29.6 29.6 13.5 25.1 39.9 28.5 40.0 40.0
Volume/Cap: 0.69 0.73 0.56 0.73 0.69 0.69 0.61 0.63 0.72 0.73 0.61 0.61
Delay/Veh: 50.1 37.5 16.8 55.3 37.4 37.4 50.7 39.7 34.1 40.8 29.4 29.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 50.1 37.5 16.8 55.3 37.4 37.4 50.7 39.7 34.1 40.8 29.4 29.4
LOS by Move: D D+ B E+ D+ D+ D D C-D C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 14 13 5 10 10 6 9 15 13 12 12
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 10:30:36 2014 Page 10-2
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #18: Wolfe Road and Homestead Road (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:121 946 255***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
131 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
0 228
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
547 2 Critical V/C:0.738 1 600
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):40.1 0
458*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):36.5 2 606***
LOS:D+
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:292 818***545
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 264 826 193 141 774 117 126 463 181 257 545 109
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 264 826 193 141 774 117 126 463 181 257 545 109
Added Vol: 24 39 153 57 131 0 0 100 201 185 24 7
App+Div: 4 -47 199 57 41 4 5 -16 76 164 31 112
Initial Fut: 292 818 545 255 946 121 131 547 458 606 600 228
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 292 818 545 255 946 121 131 547 458 606 600 228
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 292 818 545 255 946 121 131 547 458 606 600 228
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 292 818 545 255 946 121 131 547 458 606 600 228
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.98 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.65 0.35 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.43 0.57
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 3150 4964 635 1750 3800 1750 3150 2680 1019
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.22 0.31 0.08 0.19 0.19 0.07 0.14 0.26 0.19 0.22 0.22
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 14.4 32.1 60.7 12.1 29.7 29.7 13.5 25.2 39.6 28.7 40.4 40.4
Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.74 0.56 0.74 0.71 0.71 0.61 0.63 0.73 0.74 0.61 0.61
Delay/Veh: 51.2 37.8 16.8 55.6 37.8 37.8 50.8 39.7 34.7 40.8 29.2 29.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 51.2 37.8 16.8 55.6 37.8 37.8 50.8 39.7 34.7 40.8 29.2 29.2
LOS by Move: D-D+ B E+ D+ D+ D D C-D C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 14 13 5 11 11 6 9 16 13 12 12
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 10:30:36 2014 Page 10-3
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #18: Wolfe Road and Homestead Road (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:168 994***256
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
160 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
0 228
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
576 2 Critical V/C:0.784 1 631
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):42.2 0
525*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):38.3 2 606***
LOS:D+
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:386***823 553
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 264 826 193 141 774 117 126 463 181 257 545 109
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 264 826 193 141 774 117 126 463 181 257 545 109
Added Vol: 118 44 161 58 179 47 29 129 268 185 55 7
App+Div: 4 -47 199 57 41 4 5 -16 76 164 31 112
Initial Fut: 386 823 553 256 994 168 160 576 525 606 631 228
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 386 823 553 256 994 168 160 576 525 606 631 228
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 386 823 553 256 994 168 160 576 525 606 631 228
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 386 823 553 256 994 168 160 576 525 606 631 228
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.53 0.47 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.44 0.56
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 3150 4816 814 1750 3800 1750 3150 2729 986
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.22 0.32 0.08 0.21 0.21 0.09 0.15 0.30 0.19 0.23 0.23
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 17.2 33.5 60.5 12.6 28.9 28.9 14.7 24.9 42.1 27.0 37.2 37.2
Volume/Cap: 0.78 0.71 0.57 0.71 0.78 0.78 0.68 0.67 0.78 0.78 0.68 0.68
Delay/Veh: 52.7 36.0 17.1 53.4 40.5 40.5 53.6 40.9 36.0 44.1 32.9 32.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 52.7 36.0 17.1 53.4 40.5 40.5 53.6 40.9 36.0 44.1 32.9 32.9
LOS by Move: D-D+ B D-D D D-D D+ D C-C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 10 13 13 5 12 12 7 10 18 13 14 14
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 10:30:36 2014 Page 10-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #18: Wolfe Road and Homestead Road (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:174 1078***256
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
161 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
0 228
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
586 2 Critical V/C:0.828 1 639
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):44.5 0
559*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):39.6 2 617***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:411***853 570
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 264 826 193 141 774 117 126 463 181 257 545 109
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 264 826 193 141 774 117 126 463 181 257 545 109
Added Vol: 143 74 178 58 263 53 30 139 302 196 63 7
App+Div: 4 -47 199 57 41 4 5 -16 76 164 31 112
Initial Fut: 411 853 570 256 1078 174 161 586 559 617 639 228
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 411 853 570 256 1078 174 161 586 559 617 639 228
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 411 853 570 256 1078 174 161 586 559 617 639 228
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 411 853 570 256 1078 174 161 586 559 617 639 228
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.55 0.45 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.44 0.56
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 3150 4850 783 1750 3800 1750 3150 2739 977
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.22 0.33 0.08 0.22 0.22 0.09 0.15 0.32 0.20 0.23 0.23
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 17.3 34.4 60.4 12.5 29.5 29.5 14.5 25.1 42.4 26.0 36.7 36.7
Volume/Cap: 0.83 0.72 0.59 0.72 0.83 0.83 0.70 0.68 0.83 0.83 0.70 0.70
Delay/Veh: 55.9 35.6 17.6 53.9 41.8 41.8 54.9 40.9 38.9 47.5 33.7 33.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 55.9 35.6 17.6 53.9 41.8 41.8 54.9 40.9 38.9 47.5 33.7 33.7
LOS by Move: E+ D+ B D-D D D-D D+ D C-C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 14 14 5 14 14 7 10 21 14 14 14
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-65
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #19: Wolfe Road and Apple Campus 2 Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 1449 586***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):110
1 51
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.861 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):31.4 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):18.9 2 158***
LOS:B-
Lanes:0 0 2 0 2
Final Vol:0 2107***1657
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Apple Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1790 0 0 1212 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1790 0 0 1212 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 174 1265 409 114 0 0 0 0 157 0 38
App+Div: 0 143 392 177 123 0 0 0 0 1 0 13
Initial Fut: 0 2107 1657 586 1449 0 0 0 0 158 0 51
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2107 1657 586 1449 0 0 0 0 158 0 51
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2107 1657 586 1449 0 0 0 0 158 0 51
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2107 1657 586 1449 0 0 0 0 158 0 51
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.83 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 3150 3150 5700 0 0 0 0 3150 0 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.55 0.53 0.19 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.03
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 68.1 78.1 22.9 91.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.90 0.74 0.90 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.32
Delay/Veh: 0.0 22.8 11.1 57.3 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.2 0.0 48.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 22.8 11.1 57.3 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.2 0.0 48.0
LOS by Move: A C+ B+ E+ A A A A A D A D
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 34 21 15 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-66
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #19: Wolfe Road and Apple Campus 2 Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 1457 586***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):110
1 51
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.875 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):32.5 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):19.5 2 158***
LOS:B-
Lanes:0 0 2 0 2
Final Vol:0 2154***1657
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Apple Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1790 0 0 1212 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1790 0 0 1212 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 221 1265 409 122 0 0 0 0 157 0 38
App+Div: 0 143 392 177 123 0 0 0 0 1 0 13
Initial Fut: 0 2154 1657 586 1457 0 0 0 0 158 0 51
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2154 1657 586 1457 0 0 0 0 158 0 51
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2154 1657 586 1457 0 0 0 0 158 0 51
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2154 1657 586 1457 0 0 0 0 158 0 51
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.83 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 3150 3150 5700 0 0 0 0 3150 0 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.57 0.53 0.19 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.03
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 68.5 78.5 22.5 91.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.91 0.74 0.91 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.32
Delay/Veh: 0.0 23.8 10.8 59.8 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.2 0.0 48.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 23.8 10.8 59.8 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.2 0.0 48.0
LOS by Move: A C B+ E+ A A A A A D A D
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 35 21 15 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-67
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #19: Wolfe Road and Apple Campus 2 Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 1558 586***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):110
1 51
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.910 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):36.8 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):21.3 2 158***
LOS:C+
Lanes:0 0 2 0 2
Final Vol:0 2278***1657
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Apple Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1790 0 0 1212 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1790 0 0 1212 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 345 1265 409 223 0 0 0 0 157 0 38
App+Div: 0 143 392 177 123 0 0 0 0 1 0 13
Initial Fut: 0 2278 1657 586 1558 0 0 0 0 158 0 51
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2278 1657 586 1558 0 0 0 0 158 0 51
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2278 1657 586 1558 0 0 0 0 158 0 51
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2278 1657 586 1558 0 0 0 0 158 0 51
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.83 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 3150 3150 5700 0 0 0 0 3150 0 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.60 0.53 0.19 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.03
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 69.4 79.4 21.6 91.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.95 0.73 0.95 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.32
Delay/Veh: 0.0 27.9 10.2 68.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.2 0.0 48.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 27.9 10.2 68.0 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.2 0.0 48.0
LOS by Move: A C B+ E A A A A A D A D
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 41 20 16 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-68
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #19: Wolfe Road and Apple Campus 2 Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 1687 586***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):110
1 51
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.930 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):40.5 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):22.8 2 158***
LOS:C+
Lanes:0 0 2 0 2
Final Vol:0 2349***1657
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Apple Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1790 0 0 1212 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1790 0 0 1212 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 416 1265 409 352 0 0 0 0 157 0 38
App+Div: 0 143 392 177 123 0 0 0 0 1 0 13
Initial Fut: 0 2349 1657 586 1687 0 0 0 0 158 0 51
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2349 1657 586 1687 0 0 0 0 158 0 51
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2349 1657 586 1687 0 0 0 0 158 0 51
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2349 1657 586 1687 0 0 0 0 158 0 51
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.83 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 3150 3150 5700 0 0 0 0 3150 0 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.62 0.53 0.19 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.03
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 69.9 79.9 21.1 91.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.97 0.72 0.97 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.32
Delay/Veh: 0.0 31.5 9.8 73.8 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.2 0.0 48.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 31.5 9.8 73.8 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.2 0.0 48.0
LOS by Move: A C A E A A A A A D A D
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 44 20 17 5 0 0 0 0 4 0 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-69
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #20: Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:26 1685 13***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
57 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1*** 0 Critical V/C:0.680 1!5
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):16.9 0
106 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):17.0 0 102***
LOS:B
Lanes:2 0 3 1 0
Final Vol:122 3509***0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 108 1555 502 108 1219 24 40 18 104 158 15 139
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 108 1555 502 108 1219 24 40 18 104 158 15 139
Added Vol: 0 1429 11 4 268 0 0 0 0 51 0 10
App+Div: 14 525 -469 -99 198 2 17 -17 2 -107 -10 -95
Initial Fut: 122 3509 44 13 1685 26 57 1 106 102 5 54
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 122 3509 0 13 1685 26 57 1 106 102 5 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 122 3509 0 13 1685 26 57 1 106 102 5 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 122 3509 0 13 1685 26 57 1 106 102 5 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.79 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.85 0.77 0.88 0.96 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 4.00 0.00 1.00 2.95 0.05 1.00 0.01 0.99 0.96 0.04 0.00
Final Sat.: 2992 7600 0 1663 5595 86 1663 14 1458 1599 78 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.46 0.00 0.01 0.30 0.30 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 13.5 70.2 0.0 7.0 63.8 63.8 8.5 11.1 11.1 9.7 12.2 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.33 0.72 0.00 0.12 0.52 0.52 0.44 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.57 0.00
Delay/Veh: 44.7 13.9 0.0 49.1 14.1 14.1 50.8 64.1 64.1 64.9 50.8 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 44.7 13.9 0.0 49.1 14.1 14.1 50.8 64.1 64.1 64.9 50.8 0.0
LOS by Move: D B A D B B D E E E D A
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 18 0 1 12 12 3 5 5 5 5 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 2 0 3 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0
Lane Group: L RT RT L RT RT L RT RT LTR LTR LTR
#LnsInGrps: 2 4 4 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 11 0 10
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 4 4 xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx
RT Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 0.85 0.85 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.96 0.96 xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.84 0.96 0.96 1.00
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.79 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.85 0.77 0.88 0.96 0.92
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-70
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (Ped/Bike Sat Adj)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #20 Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
CrsswalkWid: 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 0.00
CrsswalkLen: 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.00 0.00 xxxxx 0.00 0.00
MinPedGrn: 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.29 0.00 30.20 0.00 0.00
PedGrn: 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.29 0.00 30.20 0.00 0.00
PedVolume: 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0
PedFlowRate: 0 0 0 98 0 0 0 0
BikeVol: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
BikeFlwRate: 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
PedOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.049 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
BikeOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.021 0.000 0.000
PedAfterOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
rOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.049 0.000 0.021 0.000 0.000
TurnVehAdj: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.951 0.000 0.987 0.000 0.000
Prt: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.015 0.000 0.991 0.000 0.000
Prta: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Plt: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Plta: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
PedBike Adj: 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.999 1.000 0.987 1.000 1.000
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #20 Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 13.5 70.2 0.0 7.0 63.8 63.8 8.5 11.1 11.1 9.7 12.2 0.0
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 2.1 18.0 0.0 0.4 10.5 10.5 1.8 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.4 0.0
UpstreamVC: 1.23 1.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 0.03 0.08 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Q2: 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 1.1 1.1 0.7 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.2 0.0
HCM2KQueue: 2.1 18.2 0.0 0.5 11.6 11.6 2.5 5.4 5.4 5.4 4.6 0.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.19 1.16 1.20 1.20 1.17 1.17 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.20
HCM2k70thQ: 2.5 21.2 0.0 0.7 13.6 13.6 3.0 6.4 6.4 6.4 5.4 0.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.58 1.46 1.60 1.59 1.50 1.50 1.58 1.55 1.55 1.55 1.56 1.60
HCM2k85thQ: 3.3 26.6 0.0 0.9 17.4 17.4 4.0 8.4 8.3 8.3 7.1 0.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.76 1.56 1.80 1.79 1.62 1.62 1.75 1.70 1.71 1.71 1.72 1.80
HCM2k90thQ: 3.6 28.4 0.0 1.0 18.8 18.8 4.5 9.3 9.2 9.2 7.9 0.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 2.03 1.72 2.10 2.08 1.82 1.82 2.02 1.94 1.95 1.94 1.97 2.10
HCM2k95thQ: 4.2 31.3 0.0 1.1 21.0 21.0 5.1 10.5 10.5 10.5 9.0 0.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.55 1.95 2.70 2.66 2.11 2.11 2.52 2.36 2.36 2.36 2.40 2.70
HCM2k98thQ: 5.3 35.4 0.0 1.5 24.4 24.4 6.4 12.8 12.7 12.7 11.0 0.0
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #20 Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 27.9 589 0.0 3.1 253 3.9 13.6 0.2 25.7 24.8 1.2 0.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 134.539 pounds
21.795 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 419.763 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 31.729 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 5.409 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.279 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 134.539 pounds
21.795 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 419.763 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 31.729 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 5.409 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.279 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-71
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #20: Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:26 1700 11***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
57 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1*** 0 Critical V/C:0.660 1!5
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):14.4 0
106 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):14.7 0 74***
LOS:B
Lanes:2 0 3 1 0
Final Vol:122 3577***0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 108 1555 502 108 1219 24 40 18 104 158 15 139
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 108 1555 502 108 1219 24 40 18 104 158 15 139
Added Vol: 0 1497 8 2 283 0 0 0 0 23 0 5
App+Div: 14 525 -469 -99 198 2 17 -17 2 -107 -10 -95
Initial Fut: 122 3577 41 11 1700 26 57 1 106 74 5 49
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 122 3577 0 11 1700 26 57 1 106 74 5 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 122 3577 0 11 1700 26 57 1 106 74 5 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 122 3577 0 11 1700 26 57 1 106 74 5 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 0.99 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 4.00 0.00 1.00 2.95 0.05 1.00 0.01 0.99 0.94 0.06 0.00
Final Sat.: 3150 7500 0 1750 5516 84 1750 17 1783 1639 111 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.48 0.00 0.01 0.31 0.31 0.03 0.06 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 13.9 74.0 0.0 7.0 67.1 67.1 7.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.31 0.71 0.00 0.10 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.65 0.65 0.71 0.50 0.00
Delay/Veh: 44.1 11.7 0.0 48.9 12.2 12.2 53.8 57.5 57.5 69.5 50.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 44.1 11.7 0.0 48.9 12.2 12.2 53.8 57.5 57.5 69.5 50.0 0.0
LOS by Move: D B+ A D B B D-E+ E+ E D A
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 18 0 0 11 11 3 5 5 4 3 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-72
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #20: Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:26 1799 18***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
57 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1*** 0 Critical V/C:0.757 1!5
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):21.6 0
106 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):20.6 0 171***
LOS:C+
Lanes:2 0 3 1 0
Final Vol:122 3691***0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 108 1555 502 108 1219 24 40 18 104 158 15 139
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 108 1555 502 108 1219 24 40 18 104 158 15 139
Added Vol: 0 1611 27 9 382 0 0 0 0 120 0 23
App+Div: 14 525 -469 -99 198 2 17 -17 2 -107 -10 -95
Initial Fut: 122 3691 60 18 1799 26 57 1 106 171 5 67
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 122 3691 0 18 1799 26 57 1 106 171 5 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 122 3691 0 18 1799 26 57 1 106 171 5 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 122 3691 0 18 1799 26 57 1 106 171 5 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.79 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.85 0.77 0.88 0.95 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 4.00 0.00 1.00 2.95 0.05 1.00 0.01 0.99 0.97 0.03 0.00
Final Sat.: 2992 7600 0 1663 5601 81 1663 14 1458 1626 48 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.49 0.00 0.01 0.32 0.32 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.11 0.11 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 12.2 66.6 0.0 7.0 61.4 61.4 9.2 10.0 10.0 14.4 15.2 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.37 0.80 0.00 0.17 0.58 0.58 0.41 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.76 0.00
Delay/Veh: 46.1 17.7 0.0 49.5 16.1 16.1 49.8 76.9 76.9 65.2 59.3 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 46.1 17.7 0.0 49.5 16.1 16.1 49.8 76.9 76.9 65.2 59.3 0.0
LOS by Move: D B A D B B D E-E-E E+ A
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 22 0 1 13 13 2 6 6 8 8 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 2 0 3 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0
Lane Group: L RT RT L RT RT L RT RT LTR LTR LTR
#LnsInGrps: 2 4 4 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 11 0 10
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 4 4 xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx
RT Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 0.85 0.85 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 0.95 xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.84 0.95 0.95 1.00
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.79 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.85 0.77 0.88 0.95 0.92
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-73
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (Ped/Bike Sat Adj)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #20 Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
CrsswalkWid: 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 0.00
CrsswalkLen: 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.00 0.00 xxxxx 0.00 0.00
MinPedGrn: 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.29 0.00 30.20 0.00 0.00
PedGrn: 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.29 0.00 30.20 0.00 0.00
PedVolume: 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0
PedFlowRate: 0 0 0 98 0 0 0 0
BikeVol: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
BikeFlwRate: 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
PedOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.049 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
BikeOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.021 0.000 0.000
PedAfterOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
rOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.049 0.000 0.021 0.000 0.000
TurnVehAdj: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.951 0.000 0.987 0.000 0.000
Prt: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.014 0.000 0.991 0.000 0.000
Prta: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Plt: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Plta: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
PedBike Adj: 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.999 1.000 0.987 1.000 1.000
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #20 Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 12.2 66.6 0.0 7.0 61.4 61.4 9.2 10.0 10.0 14.4 15.2 0.0
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 2.1 21.6 0.0 0.6 12.1 12.1 1.8 3.5 3.5 5.7 5.6 0.0
UpstreamVC: 1.30 1.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 0.03 0.08 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Q2: 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 1.3 1.3 0.7 2.4 2.4 2.8 2.4 0.0
HCM2KQueue: 2.1 21.9 0.0 0.8 13.4 13.4 2.4 5.9 5.9 8.4 8.0 0.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.19 1.16 1.20 1.20 1.17 1.17 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.20
HCM2k70thQ: 2.5 25.4 0.0 0.9 15.7 15.7 2.9 7.0 7.0 9.9 9.5 0.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.58 1.44 1.60 1.59 1.49 1.49 1.58 1.55 1.55 1.53 1.53 1.60
HCM2k85thQ: 3.3 31.7 0.0 1.2 20.0 20.0 3.9 9.2 9.1 12.9 12.3 0.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.76 1.53 1.80 1.78 1.60 1.60 1.75 1.70 1.70 1.66 1.67 1.80
HCM2k90thQ: 3.7 33.7 0.0 1.4 21.6 21.5 4.3 10.1 10.0 14.0 13.4 0.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 2.03 1.68 2.10 2.07 1.78 1.78 2.02 1.93 1.93 1.88 1.88 2.10
HCM2k95thQ: 4.3 36.8 0.0 1.6 24.0 24.0 5.0 11.5 11.4 15.8 15.1 0.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.55 1.88 2.70 2.64 2.06 2.06 2.53 2.33 2.34 2.22 2.24 2.70
HCM2k98thQ: 5.4 41.4 0.0 2.0 27.6 27.6 6.2 13.8 13.7 18.7 18.0 0.0
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #20 Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 28.3 708 0.0 4.3 293 4.2 13.5 0.2 26.0 41.5 1.2 0.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 159.978 pounds
25.916 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 499.131 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 38.466 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 6.779 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.488 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 159.978 pounds
25.916 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 499.131 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 38.466 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 6.779 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.488 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-74
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #20: Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:26 1926 29***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
57 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1*** 0 Critical V/C:0.884 1!5
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):35.7 0
106 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):32.0 0 334***
LOS:C
Lanes:2 0 3 1 0
Final Vol:122 3756***0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 108 1555 502 108 1219 24 40 18 104 158 15 139
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 108 1555 502 108 1219 24 40 18 104 158 15 139
Added Vol: 0 1676 64 20 509 0 0 0 0 283 0 54
App+Div: 14 525 -469 -99 198 2 17 -17 2 -107 -10 -95
Initial Fut: 122 3756 97 29 1926 26 57 1 106 334 5 98
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 122 3756 0 29 1926 26 57 1 106 334 5 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 122 3756 0 29 1926 26 57 1 106 334 5 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 122 3756 0 29 1926 26 57 1 106 334 5 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.79 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.85 0.77 0.88 0.95 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 4.00 0.00 1.00 2.96 0.04 1.00 0.01 0.99 0.99 0.01 0.00
Final Sat.: 2992 7600 0 1663 5606 76 1663 14 1458 1645 25 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.49 0.00 0.02 0.34 0.34 0.03 0.07 0.07 0.20 0.20 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.1 57.4 0.0 7.0 54.3 54.3 8.0 10.0 10.0 23.6 25.6 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.45 0.95 0.00 0.27 0.70 0.70 0.47 0.80 0.80 0.95 0.87 0.00
Delay/Veh: 48.5 30.8 0.0 50.5 22.2 22.2 51.8 76.9 76.9 76.5 59.8 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 48.5 30.8 0.0 50.5 22.2 22.2 51.8 76.9 76.9 76.5 59.8 0.0
LOS by Move: D C A D C+ C+ D-E-E-E-E+ A
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 28 0 1 17 17 3 6 6 17 15 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 2 0 3 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0
Lane Group: L RT RT L RT RT L RT RT LTR LTR LTR
#LnsInGrps: 2 4 4 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 11 0 10
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 4 4 xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx
RT Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 0.85 0.85 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 0.95 xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.84 0.95 0.95 1.00
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.79 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.85 0.77 0.88 0.95 0.92
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-75
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (Ped/Bike Sat Adj)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #20 Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
CrsswalkWid: 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 0.00
CrsswalkLen: 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.00 0.00 xxxxx 0.00 0.00
MinPedGrn: 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.29 0.00 30.20 0.00 0.00
PedGrn: 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.29 0.00 30.20 0.00 0.00
PedVolume: 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0
PedFlowRate: 0 0 0 98 0 0 0 0
BikeVol: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
BikeFlwRate: 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
PedOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.049 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
BikeOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.021 0.000 0.000
PedAfterOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
rOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.049 0.000 0.021 0.000 0.000
TurnVehAdj: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.951 0.000 0.987 0.000 0.000
Prt: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.013 0.000 0.991 0.000 0.000
Prta: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Plt: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Plta: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
PedBike Adj: 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.999 1.000 0.987 1.000 1.000
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #20 Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 10.1 57.4 0.0 7.0 54.3 54.3 8.0 10.0 10.0 23.6 25.6 0.0
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 2.1 27.1 0.0 0.9 15.3 15.3 1.8 3.5 3.5 11.1 10.8 0.0
UpstreamVC: 1.33 1.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 0.02 0.07 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Q2: 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.4 2.2 2.2 0.8 2.4 2.4 5.6 4.2 0.0
HCM2KQueue: 2.1 28.2 0.0 1.3 17.5 17.5 2.6 5.9 5.9 16.7 15.0 0.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.19 1.15 1.20 1.20 1.16 1.16 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.17 1.17 1.20
HCM2k70thQ: 2.6 32.4 0.0 1.5 20.4 20.4 3.1 7.0 7.0 19.5 17.6 0.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.58 1.42 1.60 1.59 1.47 1.47 1.57 1.55 1.55 1.47 1.48 1.60
HCM2k85thQ: 3.4 39.9 0.0 2.0 25.7 25.7 4.1 9.2 9.1 24.6 22.3 0.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.76 1.50 1.80 1.78 1.57 1.57 1.75 1.70 1.70 1.57 1.59 1.80
HCM2k90thQ: 3.8 42.2 0.0 2.3 27.4 27.4 4.6 10.1 10.0 26.3 23.9 0.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 2.03 1.63 2.10 2.06 1.73 1.73 2.02 1.93 1.93 1.74 1.76 2.10
HCM2k95thQ: 4.4 45.8 0.0 2.6 30.2 30.2 5.3 11.5 11.4 29.0 26.5 0.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.55 1.81 2.70 2.61 1.96 1.96 2.52 2.33 2.34 1.98 2.01 2.70
HCM2k98thQ: 5.5 51.1 0.0 3.3 34.3 34.3 6.6 13.8 13.7 33.0 30.3 0.0
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #20 Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 28.9 888 0.0 6.9 371 5.0 13.7 0.2 26.0 82.3 1.2 0.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 222.306 pounds
36.014 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 693.596 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 55.627 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 10.492 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.922 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 222.306 pounds
36.014 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 693.596 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 55.627 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 10.492 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.922 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-76
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #21: Wolfe Road and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1266 0
Lanes:1 0 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):55
2 1150***
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.232 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):125.0 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):88.3 2 483
LOS:F
Lanes:0 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:0 2527***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
Added Vol: 0 973 145 0 164 155 0 0 0 68 0 467
App+Div: 0 53 91 0 86 17 0 0 0 44 0 19
Initial Fut: 0 2527 509 0 1266 637 0 0 0 483 0 1150
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2527 0 0 1266 0 0 0 0 483 0 1150
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2527 0 0 1266 0 0 0 0 483 0 1150
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2527 0 0 1266 0 0 0 0 483 0 1150
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 1750 0 3800 1750 0 0 0 3150 0 3150
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.37
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 29.7 0.0 0.0 29.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 0.0 16.3
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.23 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 1.23
Delay/Veh: 0.0 121 0.0 0.0 9.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.6 0.0 133.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 121 0.0 0.0 9.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.6 0.0 133.0
LOS by Move: A F A A A A A A A B A F
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 49 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 5 0 31
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-77
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #21: Wolfe Road and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1258 0
Lanes:1 0 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):55
2 1165***
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.253 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):134.2 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):94.9 2 506
LOS:F
Lanes:0 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:0 2577***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
Added Vol: 0 1023 141 0 156 151 0 0 0 91 0 482
App+Div: 0 53 91 0 86 17 0 0 0 44 0 19
Initial Fut: 0 2577 505 0 1258 633 0 0 0 506 0 1165
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2577 0 0 1258 0 0 0 0 506 0 1165
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2577 0 0 1258 0 0 0 0 506 0 1165
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2577 0 0 1258 0 0 0 0 506 0 1165
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 1750 0 3800 1750 0 0 0 3150 0 3150
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.37
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 29.8 0.0 0.0 29.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.2 0.0 16.2
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.25 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.00 1.25
Delay/Veh: 0.0 131 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.9 0.0 142.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 131 0.0 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.9 0.0 142.1
LOS by Move: A F A A A A A A A B A F
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 52 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 5 0 33
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-78
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #21: Wolfe Road and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1398 0
Lanes:1 0 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):55
2 1222***
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.299 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):154.2 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):104.9 2 692
LOS:F
Lanes:0 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:0 2653***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
Added Vol: 0 1099 170 0 296 206 0 0 0 277 0 539
App+Div: 0 53 91 0 86 17 0 0 0 44 0 19
Initial Fut: 0 2653 534 0 1398 688 0 0 0 692 0 1222
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2653 0 0 1398 0 0 0 0 692 0 1222
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2653 0 0 1398 0 0 0 0 692 0 1222
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2653 0 0 1398 0 0 0 0 692 0 1222
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 1750 0 3800 1750 0 0 0 3150 0 3150
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.39
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 29.6 0.0 0.0 29.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.4 0.0 16.4
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.30 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.00 1.30
Delay/Veh: 0.0 151 0.0 0.0 10.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.4 0.0 161.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 151 0.0 0.0 10.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.4 0.0 161.5
LOS by Move: A F A A B+ A A A A C+ A F
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 59 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 8 0 36
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-79
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #21: Wolfe Road and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1602 0
Lanes:1 0 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):55
2 1251***
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.332 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):169.0 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):113.2 2 942
LOS:F
Lanes:0 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:0 2725***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
Added Vol: 0 1171 248 0 500 292 0 0 0 527 0 568
App+Div: 0 53 91 0 86 17 0 0 0 44 0 19
Initial Fut: 0 2725 612 0 1602 774 0 0 0 942 0 1251
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2725 0 0 1602 0 0 0 0 942 0 1251
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2725 0 0 1602 0 0 0 0 942 0 1251
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2725 0 0 1602 0 0 0 0 942 0 1251
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 1750 0 3800 1750 0 0 0 3150 0 3150
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.40
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 29.6 0.0 0.0 29.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.4 0.0 16.4
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.33 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.33
Delay/Veh: 0.0 166 0.0 0.0 12.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.4 0.0 176.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 166 0.0 0.0 12.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.4 0.0 176.1
LOS by Move: A F A A B A A A A D A F
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 63 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 17 0 39
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-80
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #22: Wolfe Road and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1164 0
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
1435*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):55
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.056 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):56.1 0
842 2 Avg Delay (sec/veh):38.9 0 0
LOS:D+
Lanes:0 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:0 1626***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1055 433 0 913 474 719 0 322 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1055 433 0 913 474 719 0 322 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 409 64 0 128 104 709 0 365 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 162 34 0 123 11 7 0 155 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1626 531 0 1164 589 1435 0 842 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1626 0 0 1164 0 1435 0 842 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1626 0 0 1164 0 1435 0 842 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1626 0 0 1164 0 1435 0 842 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 1750 0 5700 1750 3150 0 3150 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 22.3 0.0 0.0 22.3 0.0 23.7 0.0 23.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.06 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 1.06 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 55.8 0.0 0.0 12.4 0.0 56.4 0.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 55.8 0.0 0.0 12.4 0.0 56.4 0.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A E+ A A B A E+ A B A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 26 0 0 5 0 27 0 8 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-81
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #22: Wolfe Road and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1186 0
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
1486*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):55
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.074 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):62.5 0
889 2 Avg Delay (sec/veh):42.6 0 0
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:0 1622***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1055 433 0 913 474 719 0 322 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1055 433 0 913 474 719 0 322 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 405 71 0 150 96 760 0 412 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 162 34 0 123 11 7 0 155 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1622 538 0 1186 581 1486 0 889 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1622 0 0 1186 0 1486 0 889 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1622 0 0 1186 0 1486 0 889 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1622 0 0 1186 0 1486 0 889 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 1750 0 5700 1750 3150 0 3150 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 21.9 0.0 0.0 21.9 0.0 24.1 0.0 24.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.07 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 1.07 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 62.6 0.0 0.0 12.8 0.0 62.3 0.0 13.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 62.6 0.0 0.0 12.8 0.0 62.3 0.0 13.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A E A A B A E A B A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 27 0 0 5 0 29 0 8 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-82
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #22: Wolfe Road and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1450 0
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
1561*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):55
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.112 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):76.6 0
1261 2 Avg Delay (sec/veh):49.8 0 0
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:0 1650***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1055 433 0 913 474 719 0 322 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1055 433 0 913 474 719 0 322 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 433 124 0 414 159 835 0 784 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 162 34 0 123 11 7 0 155 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1650 591 0 1450 644 1561 0 1261 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1650 0 0 1450 0 1561 0 1261 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1650 0 0 1450 0 1561 0 1261 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1650 0 0 1450 0 1561 0 1261 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 1750 0 5700 1750 3150 0 3150 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 21.5 0.0 0.0 21.5 0.0 24.5 0.0 24.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 1.11 0.00 0.90 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 77.1 0.0 0.0 14.4 0.0 76.0 0.0 22.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 77.1 0.0 0.0 14.4 0.0 76.0 0.0 22.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A E-A A B A E-A C+ A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 29 0 0 7 0 33 0 16 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-83
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #22: Wolfe Road and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1837 0
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
1609 2
Cycle Time (sec):55
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.231 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):126.0 0
1788*** 2 Avg Delay (sec/veh):86.0 0 0
LOS:F
Lanes:0 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:0 1754***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1055 433 0 913 474 719 0 322 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1055 433 0 913 474 719 0 322 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 537 186 0 801 225 883 0 1311 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 162 34 0 123 11 7 0 155 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1754 653 0 1837 710 1609 0 1788 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1754 0 0 1837 0 1609 0 1788 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1754 0 0 1837 0 1609 0 1788 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1754 0 0 1837 0 1609 0 1788 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 1750 0 5700 1750 3150 0 3150 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 20.6 0.0 0.0 20.6 0.0 25.4 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.23 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.00 1.11 0.00 1.23 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 127 0.0 0.0 19.6 0.0 73.6 0.0 124.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 127 0.0 0.0 19.6 0.0 73.6 0.0 124.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A F A A B-A E A F A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 38 0 0 10 0 33 0 46 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-84
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #23: Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1063 697***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
36*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
1 239
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1 1 Critical V/C:0.749 0 3***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):33.2 0
12 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):26.4 2 46
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:30 1849***166
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Vallco Parkway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 9 1389 130 235 843 18 2 1 2 27 3 82
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 9 1389 130 235 843 18 2 1 2 27 3 82
Added Vol: 0 393 15 324 169 0 0 0 0 8 0 80
App+Div: 21 67 21 138 51 56 34 0 10 11 0 77
Initial Fut: 30 1849 166 697 1063 74 36 1 12 46 3 239
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 30 1849 166 697 1063 0 36 1 12 46 3 239
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 30 1849 166 697 1063 0 36 1 12 46 3 239
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 30 1849 166 697 1063 0 36 1 12 46 3 239
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.73 0.27 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.02 1.98
Final Sat.: 1750 5194 466 3150 5700 1750 1750 1900 1750 3150 43 3460
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.36 0.36 0.22 0.19 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.07
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 20.6 50.0 50.0 31.0 60.4 0.0 7.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 41.0
Volume/Cap: 0.09 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.34 0.00 0.32 0.01 0.08 0.23 0.76 0.19
Delay/Veh: 37.1 27.1 27.1 41.0 13.8 0.0 50.9 45.5 46.0 49.5 59.0 23.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 37.1 27.1 27.1 41.0 13.8 0.0 50.9 45.5 46.0 49.5 59.0 23.3
LOS by Move: D+ C C D B A D D D D E+ C
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 21 21 15 7 0 2 0 0 1 6 3
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-85
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #23: Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1126 703***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
36*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
1 242
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1 1 Critical V/C:0.754 0 3***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):33.4 0
12 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):26.4 2 47
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:30 1848***167
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Vallco Parkway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 9 1389 130 235 843 18 2 1 2 27 3 82
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 9 1389 130 235 843 18 2 1 2 27 3 82
Added Vol: 0 392 16 330 232 0 0 0 0 9 0 83
App+Div: 21 67 21 138 51 56 34 0 10 11 0 77
Initial Fut: 30 1848 167 703 1126 74 36 1 12 47 3 242
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 30 1848 167 703 1126 0 36 1 12 47 3 242
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 30 1848 167 703 1126 0 36 1 12 47 3 242
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 30 1848 167 703 1126 0 36 1 12 47 3 242
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.95 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.74 0.26 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.02 1.98
Final Sat.: 1750 5135 464 3150 5700 1750 1750 1900 1750 3150 44 3556
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.36 0.36 0.22 0.20 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.07 0.07
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.7 50.0 50.0 31.0 61.3 0.0 7.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 41.0
Volume/Cap: 0.10 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.35 0.00 0.32 0.01 0.08 0.23 0.75 0.18
Delay/Veh: 37.8 27.3 27.3 41.4 13.5 0.0 50.9 45.5 46.0 49.6 58.0 23.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 37.8 27.3 27.3 41.4 13.5 0.0 50.9 45.5 46.0 49.6 58.0 23.3
LOS by Move: D+ C C D B A D D D D E+ C
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 21 21 15 7 0 2 0 0 1 6 3
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-86
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #23: Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1028 704***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
36*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
1 242
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1 1 Critical V/C:0.794 0 3***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):34.6 0
12 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):28.0 2 73
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:30 1836***373
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Vallco Parkway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 9 1389 130 235 843 18 2 1 2 27 3 82
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 9 1389 130 235 843 18 2 1 2 27 3 82
Added Vol: 0 380 222 331 134 0 0 0 0 35 0 83
App+Div: 21 67 21 138 51 56 34 0 10 11 0 77
Initial Fut: 30 1836 373 704 1028 74 36 1 12 73 3 242
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 30 1836 373 704 1028 0 36 1 12 73 3 242
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 30 1836 373 704 1028 0 36 1 12 73 3 242
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 30 1836 373 704 1028 0 36 1 12 73 3 242
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.46 0.54 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.02 1.98
Final Sat.: 1750 4670 949 3150 5700 1750 1750 1900 1750 3150 43 3460
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.39 0.39 0.22 0.18 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.07 0.07
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 21.1 51.6 51.6 29.4 59.9 0.0 7.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 39.4
Volume/Cap: 0.09 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.33 0.00 0.32 0.01 0.08 0.36 0.77 0.20
Delay/Veh: 36.6 28.0 28.0 45.5 14.0 0.0 50.9 45.5 46.0 50.5 59.7 24.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 36.6 28.0 28.0 45.5 14.0 0.0 50.9 45.5 46.0 50.5 59.7 24.5
LOS by Move: D+ C C D B A D D D D E+ C
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 24 24 16 6 0 2 0 0 2 6 3
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-87
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #23: Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1187 725***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
36*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
1 255
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1 1 Critical V/C:0.862 0 3***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):39.1 0
12 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):31.1 2 105
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:30 1894***586
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Vallco Parkway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 9 1389 130 235 843 18 2 1 2 27 3 82
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 9 1389 130 235 843 18 2 1 2 27 3 82
Added Vol: 0 438 435 352 293 0 0 0 0 67 0 96
App+Div: 21 67 21 138 51 56 34 0 10 11 0 77
Initial Fut: 30 1894 586 725 1187 74 36 1 12 105 3 255
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 30 1894 586 725 1187 0 36 1 12 105 3 255
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 30 1894 586 725 1187 0 36 1 12 105 3 255
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 30 1894 586 725 1187 0 36 1 12 105 3 255
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.25 0.75 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.02 1.98
Final Sat.: 1750 4267 1320 3150 5700 1750 1750 1900 1750 3150 41 3462
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.44 0.44 0.23 0.21 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.07 0.07
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.0 53.3 53.3 27.7 62.0 0.0 7.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 37.7
Volume/Cap: 0.10 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.37 0.00 0.32 0.01 0.08 0.52 0.81 0.22
Delay/Veh: 38.5 31.7 31.7 55.2 13.3 0.0 50.9 45.5 46.0 52.4 63.4 25.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 38.5 31.7 31.7 55.2 13.3 0.0 50.9 45.5 46.0 52.4 63.4 25.8
LOS by Move: D+ C C E+ B A D D D D-E C
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 30 30 18 7 0 2 0 0 3 7 3
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-88
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #24: Stevens Creek Blvd and Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 331 270***
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
562*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 330
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
841 3 Critical V/C:0.868 2 1007***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):51.7 0
82 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):46.5 2 78
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:174 1021***157
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 160 875 101 184 270 468 418 515 74 44 778 99
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 160 875 101 184 270 468 418 515 74 44 778 99
Added Vol: 1 122 21 64 52 60 111 193 0 6 100 175
App+Div: 13 24 35 22 9 44 33 133 8 28 129 56
Initial Fut: 174 1021 157 270 331 572 562 841 82 78 1007 330
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 174 1021 157 270 331 0 562 841 82 78 1007 330
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 174 1021 157 270 331 0 562 841 82 78 1007 330
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 174 1021 157 270 331 0 562 841 82 78 1007 330
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.57 0.43 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.21 0.79
Final Sat.: 1750 4885 751 1750 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 4204 1378
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.21 0.21 0.15 0.09 0.00 0.18 0.15 0.05 0.02 0.24 0.24
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 26.8 28.9 28.9 21.3 23.5 0.0 24.7 41.4 41.4 16.4 33.1 33.1
Volume/Cap: 0.45 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.45 0.00 0.87 0.43 0.14 0.18 0.87 0.87
Delay/Veh: 41.0 50.0 50.0 69.9 43.0 0.0 58.1 30.3 27.1 46.1 46.9 46.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.0 50.0 50.0 69.9 43.0 0.0 58.1 30.3 27.1 46.1 46.9 46.9
LOS by Move: D D D E D A E+ C C D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 17 17 13 6 0 13 8 2 1 17 17
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-89
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #24: Stevens Creek Blvd and Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 405 254***
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
569*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 320
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
838 3 Critical V/C:0.866 2 1035***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):51.3 0
84 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):46.1 2 91
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:174 1024***159
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 160 875 101 184 270 468 418 515 74 44 778 99
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 160 875 101 184 270 468 418 515 74 44 778 99
Added Vol: 1 125 23 48 126 66 118 190 2 19 128 165
App+Div: 13 24 35 22 9 44 33 133 8 28 129 56
Initial Fut: 174 1024 159 254 405 578 569 838 84 91 1035 320
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 174 1024 159 254 405 0 569 838 84 91 1035 320
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 174 1024 159 254 405 0 569 838 84 91 1035 320
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 174 1024 159 254 405 0 569 838 84 91 1035 320
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.58 0.42 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.27 0.73
Final Sat.: 1750 4846 753 1750 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 4276 1322
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.21 0.21 0.15 0.11 0.00 0.18 0.15 0.05 0.03 0.24 0.24
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.8 29.3 29.3 20.1 25.6 0.0 25.0 41.9 41.9 16.6 33.6 33.6
Volume/Cap: 0.50 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.50 0.00 0.87 0.42 0.14 0.21 0.87 0.87
Delay/Veh: 43.9 49.5 49.5 71.2 42.1 0.0 57.5 29.9 26.8 46.1 46.4 46.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 43.9 49.5 49.5 71.2 42.1 0.0 57.5 29.9 26.8 46.1 46.4 46.4
LOS by Move: D D D E D A E+ C C D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 17 17 13 7 0 13 8 2 2 17 17
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-90
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #24: Stevens Creek Blvd and Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 446 187***
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
740*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 200
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
885 3 Critical V/C:0.881 2 1107***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):52.1 0
84 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):46.5 2 92
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:174 1076***160
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 160 875 101 184 270 468 418 515 74 44 778 99
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 160 875 101 184 270 468 418 515 74 44 778 99
Added Vol: 1 177 24 -19 167 77 289 237 2 20 200 45
App+Div: 13 24 35 22 9 44 33 133 8 28 129 56
Initial Fut: 174 1076 160 187 446 589 740 885 84 92 1107 200
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 174 1076 160 187 446 0 740 885 84 92 1107 200
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 174 1076 160 187 446 0 740 885 84 92 1107 200
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 174 1076 160 187 446 0 740 885 84 92 1107 200
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.58 0.42 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.51 0.49
Final Sat.: 1750 4908 730 1750 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 4765 861
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.22 0.22 0.11 0.12 0.00 0.23 0.16 0.05 0.03 0.23 0.23
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 20.4 29.8 29.8 14.5 24.0 0.0 32.0 46.2 46.2 17.4 31.6 31.6
Volume/Cap: 0.59 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.59 0.00 0.88 0.40 0.12 0.20 0.88 0.88
Delay/Veh: 49.0 50.2 50.2 83.9 44.7 0.0 52.9 27.0 23.9 45.4 48.9 48.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 49.0 50.2 50.2 83.9 44.7 0.0 52.9 27.0 23.9 45.4 48.9 48.9
LOS by Move: D D D F D A D-C C D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 18 18 10 8 0 17 8 2 2 17 17
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-91
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #24: Stevens Creek Blvd and Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 573 198***
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
967*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 202
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
906 3 Critical V/C:0.982 2 1133***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):68.2 0
85 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):57.8 2 98
LOS:E+
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:175 1118***161
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 160 875 101 184 270 468 418 515 74 44 778 99
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 160 875 101 184 270 468 418 515 74 44 778 99
Added Vol: 2 219 25 -8 294 131 516 258 3 26 226 47
App+Div: 13 24 35 22 9 44 33 133 8 28 129 56
Initial Fut: 175 1118 161 198 573 643 967 906 85 98 1133 202
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 175 1118 161 198 573 0 967 906 85 98 1133 202
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 175 1118 161 198 573 0 967 906 85 98 1133 202
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 175 1118 161 198 573 0 967 906 85 98 1133 202
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.59 0.41 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.51 0.49
Final Sat.: 1750 4929 710 1750 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 4776 851
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.23 0.23 0.11 0.15 0.00 0.31 0.16 0.05 0.03 0.24 0.24
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 16.6 27.7 27.7 13.8 25.0 0.0 37.5 48.6 48.6 17.8 29.0 29.0
Volume/Cap: 0.72 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.72 0.00 0.98 0.39 0.12 0.21 0.98 0.98
Delay/Veh: 59.9 66.6 66.6 111.1 47.7 0.0 65.3 25.3 22.4 45.1 65.5 65.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 59.9 66.6 66.6 111.1 47.7 0.0 65.3 25.3 22.4 45.1 65.5 65.5
LOS by Move: E+ E E F D A E C C+ D E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 8 21 21 12 11 0 25 8 2 2 19 19
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-92
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #25: Miller Ave and Bollinger Road (SJ)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:160 283***168
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
264*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 237
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
574 1 Critical V/C:0.747 1 519***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):47.7 0
73 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):42.0 1 67
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:138***698 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Miller Av Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 138 627 250 145 236 155 240 573 73 67 519 225
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 138 627 250 145 236 155 240 573 73 67 519 225
Added Vol: 0 40 0 9 29 2 11 1 0 0 0 10
App+Div: 0 31 0 14 18 3 13 0 0 0 0 2
Initial Fut: 138 698 250 168 283 160 264 574 73 67 519 237
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 138 698 0 168 283 160 264 574 73 67 519 237
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 138 698 0 168 283 160 264 574 73 67 519 237
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 138 698 0 168 283 160 264 574 73 67 519 237
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.62 0.38 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.34 0.66
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 3150 1177 666 1750 3339 425 1750 2540 1160
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.18 0.00 0.05 0.24 0.24 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.20 0.20
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 13.1 40.6 0.0 12.5 39.9 39.9 25.1 44.4 44.4 14.6 33.9 33.9
Volume/Cap: 0.75 0.56 0.00 0.53 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.48 0.48 0.33 0.75 0.75
Delay/Veh: 69.2 35.0 0.0 54.7 42.7 42.7 54.9 31.1 31.1 51.1 44.2 44.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 69.2 35.0 0.0 54.7 42.7 42.7 54.9 31.1 31.1 51.1 44.2 44.2
LOS by Move: E C-A D-D D D-C C D-D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 11 0 4 17 17 12 10 10 3 15 15
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-93
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #25: Miller Ave and Bollinger Road (SJ)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:160 281***167
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
264*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 241
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
574 1 Critical V/C:0.753 1 519***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):48.1 0
73 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):42.1 1 67
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:138***707 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Miller Av Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 138 627 250 145 236 155 240 573 73 67 519 225
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 138 627 250 145 236 155 240 573 73 67 519 225
Added Vol: 0 49 0 8 27 2 11 1 0 0 0 14
App+Div: 0 31 0 14 18 3 13 0 0 0 0 2
Initial Fut: 138 707 250 167 281 160 264 574 73 67 519 241
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 138 707 0 167 281 160 264 574 73 67 519 241
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 138 707 0 167 281 160 264 574 73 67 519 241
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 138 707 0 167 281 160 264 574 73 67 519 241
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.64 0.36 1.00 1.77 0.23 1.00 1.35 0.65
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 3150 1147 653 1750 3282 417 1750 2526 1173
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.19 0.00 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.21 0.21
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 13.0 40.9 0.0 12.4 40.3 40.3 24.8 44.4 44.4 14.3 33.8 33.8
Volume/Cap: 0.75 0.56 0.00 0.53 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.49 0.49 0.33 0.75 0.75
Delay/Veh: 70.0 34.8 0.0 54.7 42.9 42.9 55.6 31.3 31.3 51.4 44.5 44.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 70.0 34.8 0.0 54.7 42.9 42.9 55.6 31.3 31.3 51.4 44.5 44.5
LOS by Move: E C-A D-D D E+ C C D-D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 11 0 4 17 17 12 10 10 3 15 15
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-94
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #25: Miller Ave and Bollinger Road (SJ)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:160 292***170
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
266*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 242
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
574 1 Critical V/C:0.755 1 519***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):48.1 0
73 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):42.2 1 67
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:138***730 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Miller Av Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 138 627 250 145 236 155 240 573 73 67 519 225
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 138 627 250 145 236 155 240 573 73 67 519 225
Added Vol: 0 72 0 11 38 2 13 1 0 0 0 15
App+Div: 0 31 0 14 18 3 13 0 0 0 0 2
Initial Fut: 138 730 250 170 292 160 266 574 73 67 519 242
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 138 730 0 170 292 160 266 574 73 67 519 242
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 138 730 0 170 292 160 266 574 73 67 519 242
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 138 730 0 170 292 160 266 574 73 67 519 242
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.63 0.37 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.33 0.67
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 3150 1191 653 1750 3339 425 1750 2523 1176
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.19 0.00 0.05 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.21 0.21
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 13.0 41.1 0.0 12.1 40.3 40.3 25.0 44.2 44.2 14.5 33.8 33.8
Volume/Cap: 0.75 0.58 0.00 0.55 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.48 0.48 0.33 0.75 0.75
Delay/Veh: 70.3 34.9 0.0 55.6 42.9 42.9 55.6 31.2 31.2 51.2 44.6 44.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 70.3 34.9 0.0 55.6 42.9 42.9 55.6 31.2 31.2 51.2 44.6 44.6
LOS by Move: E C-A E+ D D E+ C C D-D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 12 0 4 17 17 12 10 10 3 15 15
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-95
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #25: Miller Ave and Bollinger Road (SJ)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:162 300***175
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
269*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 253
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
574 1 Critical V/C:0.766 1 519***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):48.7 0
73 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):42.6 1 67
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:138***773 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Miller Av Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 138 627 250 145 236 155 240 573 73 67 519 225
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 138 627 250 145 236 155 240 573 73 67 519 225
Added Vol: 0 115 0 16 46 4 16 1 0 0 0 26
App+Div: 0 31 0 14 18 3 13 0 0 0 0 2
Initial Fut: 138 773 250 175 300 162 269 574 73 67 519 253
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 138 773 0 175 300 162 269 574 73 67 519 253
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 138 773 0 175 300 162 269 574 73 67 519 253
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 138 773 0 175 300 162 269 574 73 67 519 253
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.63 0.37 1.00 1.76 0.24 1.00 1.31 0.69
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 3150 1198 647 1750 3339 425 1750 2485 1211
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.20 0.00 0.06 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.21 0.21
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 12.8 41.7 0.0 11.6 40.5 40.5 24.9 44.2 44.2 14.5 33.8 33.8
Volume/Cap: 0.77 0.60 0.00 0.59 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.48 0.48 0.33 0.77 0.77
Delay/Veh: 71.9 35.1 0.0 57.2 43.3 43.3 56.5 31.3 31.3 51.2 45.0 45.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 71.9 35.1 0.0 57.2 43.3 43.3 56.5 31.3 31.3 51.2 45.0 45.0
LOS by Move: E D+ A E+ D D E+ C C D-D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 13 0 5 18 18 12 10 10 3 15 15
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-96
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #26: Stevens Creek Blvd and Finch Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:74 0 74***
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
76*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 79
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
960 2 Critical V/C:0.435 2 1252***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):25.6 0
176 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):26.6 1 139
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:158***1 130
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Finch Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 127 0 116 4 0 6 20 587 126 117 864 10
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 127 0 116 4 0 6 20 587 126 117 864 10
Added Vol: 30 1 14 2 0 0 0 230 49 21 250 3
App+Div: 1 0 0 68 0 68 56 143 1 1 138 66
Initial Fut: 158 1 130 74 0 74 76 960 176 139 1252 79
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 158 1 130 74 0 74 76 960 176 139 1252 79
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 158 1 130 74 0 74 76 960 176 139 1252 79
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 158 1 130 74 0 74 76 960 176 139 1252 79
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.01 0.99 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.50 0.50 1.00 2.81 0.19
Final Sat.: 1750 13 1738 3150 0 1750 1750 4754 872 1750 5335 337
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.23 0.23
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.6 23.6 23.6 11.7 0.0 11.7 11.4 52.2 52.2 20.5 61.4 61.4
Volume/Cap: 0.46 0.38 0.38 0.24 0.00 0.44 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46
Delay/Veh: 43.1 42.2 42.2 50.5 0.0 52.9 53.4 24.1 24.1 45.9 18.8 18.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 43.1 42.2 42.2 50.5 0.0 52.9 53.4 24.1 24.1 45.9 18.8 18.8
LOS by Move: D D D D A D-D-C C D B-B-
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 5 5 2 0 3 3 10 10 5 10 10
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-97
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #26: Stevens Creek Blvd and Finch Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:74 0 74***
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
76*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 79
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
958 2 Critical V/C:0.438 2 1294***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):24.6 0
160 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):25.4 1 133
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:148***1 126
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Finch Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 127 0 116 4 0 6 20 587 126 117 864 10
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 127 0 116 4 0 6 20 587 126 117 864 10
Added Vol: 20 1 10 2 0 0 0 228 33 15 292 3
App+Div: 1 0 0 68 0 68 56 143 1 1 138 66
Initial Fut: 148 1 126 74 0 74 76 958 160 133 1294 79
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 148 1 126 74 0 74 76 958 160 133 1294 79
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 148 1 126 74 0 74 76 958 160 133 1294 79
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 148 1 126 74 0 74 76 958 160 133 1294 79
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 0.01 0.99 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.55 0.45 1.00 2.82 0.18
Final Sat.: 1800 14 1786 3150 0 1750 1750 4798 801 1750 5277 322
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.02 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.25 0.25
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 21.4 21.4 21.4 11.6 0.0 11.6 11.3 54.4 54.4 20.7 63.8 63.8
Volume/Cap: 0.46 0.40 0.40 0.24 0.00 0.44 0.46 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.46 0.46
Delay/Veh: 44.7 44.0 44.0 50.6 0.0 53.0 53.5 22.6 22.6 45.5 17.6 17.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 44.7 44.0 44.0 50.6 0.0 53.0 53.5 22.6 22.6 45.5 17.6 17.6
LOS by Move: D D D D A D-D-C+ C+ D B B
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 5 5 2 0 3 3 9 9 4 10 10
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-98
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #26: Stevens Creek Blvd and Finch Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:74 2***121
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
76*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 382
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
939 2 Critical V/C:0.505 2 1247***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):24.7 0
160 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):24.3 1 133
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:148***10 126
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Finch Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 127 0 116 4 0 6 20 587 126 117 864 10
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 127 0 116 4 0 6 20 587 126 117 864 10
Added Vol: 20 10 10 49 2 0 0 209 33 15 245 306
App+Div: 1 0 0 68 0 68 56 143 1 1 138 66
Initial Fut: 148 10 126 121 2 74 76 939 160 133 1247 382
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 148 10 126 121 2 74 76 939 160 133 1247 382
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 148 10 126 121 2 74 76 939 160 133 1247 382
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 148 10 126 121 2 74 76 939 160 133 1247 382
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.07 0.93 1.97 0.03 1.00 1.00 2.53 0.47 1.00 2.25 0.75
Final Sat.: 1750 129 1631 3448 57 1750 1750 4810 820 1750 4277 1310
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.29 0.29
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.7 19.7 19.7 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.1 56.3 56.3 21.9 68.1 68.1
Volume/Cap: 0.51 0.47 0.47 0.42 0.42 0.51 0.51 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.51 0.51
Delay/Veh: 46.6 46.0 46.0 52.8 52.8 53.7 55.6 21.1 21.1 44.3 16.0 16.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 46.6 46.0 46.0 52.8 52.8 53.7 55.6 21.1 21.1 44.3 16.0 16.0
LOS by Move: D D D D-D-D-E+ C+ C+ D B B
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 5 5 3 3 3 3 9 9 4 12 12
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-99
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #26: Stevens Creek Blvd and Finch Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:74 3 168***
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
76*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 685***
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
972 2 Critical V/C:0.630 2 1281
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):24.5 0
160 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):23.1 1 133
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:148***20 126
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Finch Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 127 0 116 4 0 6 20 587 126 117 864 10
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 127 0 116 4 0 6 20 587 126 117 864 10
Added Vol: 20 20 10 96 3 0 0 242 33 15 279 609
App+Div: 1 0 0 68 0 68 56 143 1 1 138 66
Initial Fut: 148 20 126 168 3 74 76 972 160 133 1281 685
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 148 20 126 168 3 74 76 972 160 133 1281 685
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 148 20 126 168 3 74 76 972 160 133 1281 685
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 148 20 126 168 3 74 76 972 160 133 1281 685
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.13 0.87 2.00 0.04 0.96 1.00 2.55 0.45 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 242 1527 3500 68 1687 1750 4836 796 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.20 0.20 0.08 0.34 0.39
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 16.0 16.0 16.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 8.2 59.5 59.5 22.5 73.9 73.9
Volume/Cap: 0.64 0.62 0.62 0.58 0.53 0.53 0.64 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.55 0.64
Delay/Veh: 52.2 51.7 51.7 54.9 53.9 53.9 65.3 19.2 19.2 43.7 13.6 15.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 52.2 51.7 51.7 54.9 53.9 53.9 65.3 19.2 19.2 43.7 13.6 15.0
LOS by Move: D-D-D-D-D-D-E B-B-D B B
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 6 6 4 4 4 3 9 9 4 13 16
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-100
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #27: Homestead Road and Tantau Avenue/Quail Av ((CUP/SUN)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:104 151***101
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
52 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 57
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
841*** 2 Critical V/C:0.883 1 947
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):61.1 0
429 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):49.6 1 237***
LOS:D
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol:350***84 5
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue/Quail Ave Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 41 68 64 96 95 92 49 549 194 178 782 51
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 41 68 64 96 95 92 49 549 194 178 782 51
Added Vol: 128 7 7 1 29 10 2 44 143 52 86 0
App+Div: 181 9 -66 4 27 2 1 248 92 7 79 6
Initial Fut: 350 84 5 101 151 104 52 841 429 237 947 57
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 350 84 5 101 151 104 52 841 429 237 947 57
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 350 84 5 101 151 104 52 841 429 237 947 57
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 350 84 5 101 151 104 52 841 429 237 947 57
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.82 0.18 1.00 0.29 0.41 0.30 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.88 0.12
Final Sat.: 1433 344 1750 514 768 529 1750 3800 1750 1750 3567 215
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.22 0.25 0.14 0.27 0.27
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 34.3 34.3 34.3 27.6 27.6 27.6 8.8 31.1 65.4 19.0 41.3 41.3
Volume/Cap: 0.88 0.88 0.01 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.42 0.88 0.46 0.88 0.80 0.80
Delay/Veh: 59.9 59.9 32.6 66.5 66.5 66.5 57.5 54.5 18.7 78.6 41.2 41.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 59.9 59.9 32.6 66.5 66.5 66.5 57.5 54.5 18.7 78.6 41.2 41.2
LOS by Move: E+ E+ C-E E E E+ D-B-E-D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 18 18 0 17 17 17 3 18 11 13 19 19
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-101
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #27: Homestead Road and Tantau Avenue/Quail Av ((CUP/SUN)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:104 152***101
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
51 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 57
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
846*** 2 Critical V/C:0.889 1 959
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):62.0 0
429 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):50.6 1 237***
LOS:D
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol:350 84***5
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue/Quail Ave Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 41 68 64 96 95 92 49 549 194 178 782 51
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 41 68 64 96 95 92 49 549 194 178 782 51
Added Vol: 128 7 7 1 30 10 1 49 143 52 98 0
App+Div: 181 9 -66 4 27 2 1 248 92 7 79 6
Initial Fut: 350 84 5 101 152 104 51 846 429 237 959 57
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 350 84 5 101 152 104 51 846 429 237 959 57
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 350 84 5 101 152 104 51 846 429 237 959 57
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 350 84 5 101 152 104 51 846 429 237 959 57
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95
Lanes: 0.81 0.19 1.00 0.28 0.43 0.29 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.88 0.12
Final Sat.: 1452 348 1750 495 745 510 1750 3800 1750 1750 3492 208
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.22 0.25 0.14 0.27 0.27
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 33.6 33.6 33.6 28.4 28.4 28.4 8.5 31.0 64.7 18.9 41.4 41.4
Volume/Cap: 0.89 0.89 0.01 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.42 0.89 0.47 0.89 0.82 0.82
Delay/Veh: 61.3 61.3 33.0 67.1 67.1 67.1 57.8 55.2 19.2 79.9 42.5 42.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 61.3 61.3 33.0 67.1 67.1 67.1 57.8 55.2 19.2 79.9 42.5 42.5
LOS by Move: E E C-E E E E+ E+ B-E-D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 18 18 0 17 17 17 3 19 11 13 20 20
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-102
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #27: Homestead Road and Tantau Avenue/Quail Av ((CUP/SUN)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:104***202 102
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
52 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 57
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
880*** 2 Critical V/C:0.947 1 985
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):72.4 0
431 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):56.9 1 264***
LOS:E+
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol:355 88***10
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue/Quail Ave Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 41 68 64 96 95 92 49 549 194 178 782 51
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 41 68 64 96 95 92 49 549 194 178 782 51
Added Vol: 133 11 12 2 80 10 2 83 145 79 124 0
App+Div: 181 9 -66 4 27 2 1 248 92 7 79 6
Initial Fut: 355 88 10 102 202 104 52 880 431 264 985 57
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 355 88 10 102 202 104 52 880 431 264 985 57
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 355 88 10 102 202 104 52 880 431 264 985 57
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 355 88 10 102 202 104 52 880 431 264 985 57
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.81 0.19 1.00 0.26 0.47 0.27 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.88 0.12
Final Sat.: 1425 353 1750 455 902 464 1750 3800 1750 1750 3575 207
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.25 0.25 0.01 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.03 0.23 0.25 0.15 0.28 0.28
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 32.6 32.6 32.6 29.3 29.3 29.3 8.5 30.3 62.9 19.7 41.5 41.5
Volume/Cap: 0.95 0.95 0.02 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.43 0.95 0.49 0.95 0.82 0.82
Delay/Veh: 73.5 73.5 33.9 76.8 76.8 76.8 57.9 64.2 20.4 91.4 42.3 42.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 73.5 73.5 33.9 76.8 76.8 76.8 57.9 64.2 20.4 91.4 42.3 42.3
LOS by Move: E E C-E-E-E-E+ E C+ F D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 20 20 0 20 20 20 3 21 11 15 20 20
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-103
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #27: Homestead Road and Tantau Avenue/Quail Av ((CUP/SUN)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:104 258 103***
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
53 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 57
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
905*** 2 Critical V/C:1.013 1 1000
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):89.5 0
433 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):67.7 1 292***
LOS:E
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol:359***97 14
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue/Quail Ave Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 41 68 64 96 95 92 49 549 194 178 782 51
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 41 68 64 96 95 92 49 549 194 178 782 51
Added Vol: 137 20 16 3 136 10 3 108 147 107 139 0
App+Div: 181 9 -66 4 27 2 1 248 92 7 79 6
Initial Fut: 359 97 14 103 258 104 53 905 433 292 1000 57
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 359 97 14 103 258 104 53 905 433 292 1000 57
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 359 97 14 103 258 104 53 905 433 292 1000 57
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 359 97 14 103 258 104 53 905 433 292 1000 57
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.80 0.20 1.00 0.23 0.54 0.23 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.88 0.12
Final Sat.: 1401 379 1750 405 1015 409 1750 3800 1750 1750 3579 204
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.26 0.26 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.03 0.24 0.25 0.17 0.28 0.28
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 31.3 31.3 31.3 31.1 31.1 31.1 8.3 29.1 60.5 20.4 41.2 41.2
Volume/Cap: 1.01 1.01 0.03 1.01 1.01 1.01 0.45 1.01 0.51 1.01 0.84 0.84
Delay/Veh: 92.1 92.1 34.9 91.9 91.9 91.9 58.4 80.9 22.1 108.3 43.6 43.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 92.1 92.1 34.9 91.9 91.9 91.9 58.4 80.9 22.1 108.3 43.6 43.6
LOS by Move: F F C-F F F E+ F C+ F D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 23 23 0 25 25 25 3 23 12 17 21 21
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-104
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #28: Tantau Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 485 41***
Lanes:0 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 334
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.624 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):31.0 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.2 1 416***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 1 0 1
Final Vol:0 575***154
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 31 253 76 36 141 39 213 88 91 151 188 168
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 31 253 76 36 141 39 213 88 91 151 188 168
Added Vol: 0 185 39 1 224 0 0 0 0 152 0 76
App+Div: -31 137 39 4 120 -39 -213 -88 -91 113 -188 90
Initial Fut: 0 575 154 41 485 0 0 0 0 416 0 334
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 575 154 41 485 0 0 0 0 416 0 334
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 575 154 41 485 0 0 0 0 416 0 334
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 575 154 41 485 0 0 0 0 416 0 334
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 1900 1750 1750 1900 0 0 1900 0 1750 0 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.30 0.09 0.02 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 58.8 58.8 7.0 53.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.2 0.0 43.4
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.64 0.19 0.42 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.55
Delay/Veh: 0.0 26.1 18.9 59.3 27.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.2 0.0 32.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 26.1 18.9 59.3 27.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.2 0.0 32.9
LOS by Move: A C B-E+ C A A A A C-A C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 16 3 2 14 0 0 0 0 14 0 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-105
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #28: Tantau Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 485 41***
Lanes:0 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 334
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.636 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):31.6 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.2 1 416***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 1 0 1
Final Vol:0 576***154
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 31 253 76 36 141 39 213 88 91 151 188 168
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 31 253 76 36 141 39 213 88 91 151 188 168
Added Vol: 0 186 39 1 224 0 0 0 0 152 0 76
App+Div: -31 137 39 4 120 -39 -213 -88 -91 113 -188 90
Initial Fut: 0 576 154 41 485 0 0 0 0 416 0 334
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 576 154 41 485 0 0 0 0 416 0 334
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 576 154 41 485 0 0 0 0 416 0 334
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 576 154 41 485 0 0 0 0 416 0 334
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.95
Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 1800 1750 1750 1800 0 0 1750 0 1800 0 1800
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.32 0.09 0.02 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 61.0 61.0 7.0 56.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.0 0.0 41.4
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.65 0.18 0.42 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.56
Delay/Veh: 0.0 25.3 17.7 59.3 26.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.9 0.0 34.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 25.3 17.7 59.3 26.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.9 0.0 34.3
LOS by Move: A C B E+ C A A A A C-A C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 16 3 2 14 0 0 0 0 14 0 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-106
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #28: Tantau Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 563 43***
Lanes:0 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 337
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.646 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):31.6 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):30.1 1 439***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 1 0 1
Final Vol:0 586***155
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 31 253 76 36 141 39 213 88 91 151 188 168
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 31 253 76 36 141 39 213 88 91 151 188 168
Added Vol: 0 196 40 3 302 0 0 0 0 175 0 79
App+Div: -31 137 39 4 120 -39 -213 -88 -91 113 -188 90
Initial Fut: 0 586 155 43 563 0 0 0 0 439 0 337
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 586 155 43 563 0 0 0 0 439 0 337
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 586 155 43 563 0 0 0 0 439 0 337
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 586 155 43 563 0 0 0 0 439 0 337
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 1900 1750 1750 1900 0 0 1900 0 1750 0 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.31 0.09 0.02 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 57.9 57.9 7.0 54.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.1 0.0 44.2
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.66 0.19 0.44 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.54
Delay/Veh: 0.0 27.3 19.4 59.6 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.2 0.0 32.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 27.3 19.4 59.6 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.2 0.0 32.3
LOS by Move: A C B-E+ C A A A A C-A C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 16 3 2 17 0 0 0 0 15 0 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-107
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #28: Tantau Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 648***44
Lanes:0 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 337
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.674 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):23.0 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):31.1 1 468***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 1 0 1
Final Vol:0***603 159
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 31 253 76 36 141 39 213 88 91 151 188 168
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 31 253 76 36 141 39 213 88 91 151 188 168
Added Vol: 0 213 44 4 387 0 0 0 0 204 0 79
App+Div: -31 137 39 4 120 -39 -213 -88 -91 113 -188 90
Initial Fut: 0 603 159 44 648 0 0 0 0 468 0 337
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 603 159 44 648 0 0 0 0 468 0 337
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 603 159 44 648 0 0 0 0 468 0 337
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 603 159 44 648 0 0 0 0 468 0 337
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 1900 1750 1750 1900 0 0 1900 0 1750 0 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.32 0.09 0.03 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 55.9 55.9 9.9 58.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.1 0.0 43.4
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.70 0.20 0.31 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.55
Delay/Veh: 0.0 30.1 20.7 55.1 28.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.6 0.0 32.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 30.1 20.7 55.1 28.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.6 0.0 32.9
LOS by Move: A C C+ E+ C A A A A D+ A C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 18 4 2 20 0 0 0 0 17 0 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-108
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #31: Tantau Avenue and Vallco Parkway/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:303 367 1***
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
441*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 1
1
Loss Time (sec):12
0
13 0 Critical V/C:0.511 1!1***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):26.2 0
91 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.2 0 2
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:218 1240***10
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Vallco Parkway/Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 136 522 10 1 234 203 121 13 19 2 1 1
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 136 522 10 1 234 203 121 13 19 2 1 1
Added Vol: 19 710 0 0 81 62 276 0 12 0 0 0
App+Div: 63 8 0 0 52 38 44 0 60 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 218 1240 10 1 367 303 441 13 91 2 1 1
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 218 1240 10 1 367 303 441 13 91 2 1 1
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 218 1240 10 1 367 303 441 13 91 2 1 1
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 218 1240 10 1 367 303 441 13 91 2 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.05 0.95 1.95 0.05 1.00 0.51 0.23 0.26
Final Sat.: 1750 3767 30 1750 2004 1654 3407 100 1750 893 446 446
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.13 0.13 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 30.4 68.2 68.2 7.0 44.8 44.8 26.8 26.8 26.8 10.0 10.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.51 0.60 0.60 0.01 0.51 0.51 0.60 0.60 0.24 0.03 0.03 0.03
Delay/Veh: 41.3 19.2 19.2 55.3 31.3 31.3 45.1 45.1 40.5 52.6 52.6 52.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.3 19.2 19.2 55.3 31.3 31.3 45.1 45.1 40.5 52.6 52.6 52.6
LOS by Move: D B-B-E+ C C D D D D-D-D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 15 15 0 10 10 9 9 3 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-109
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #31: Tantau Avenue and Vallco Parkway/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:304 367 1***
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
442 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 1
1
Loss Time (sec):12
0
13*** 0 Critical V/C:0.519 1!1
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):26.2 0
92 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.2 0 2***
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:220 1239***10
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Vallco Parkway/Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 136 522 10 1 234 203 121 13 19 2 1 1
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 136 522 10 1 234 203 121 13 19 2 1 1
Added Vol: 21 709 0 0 81 63 277 0 13 0 0 0
App+Div: 63 8 0 0 52 38 44 0 60 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 220 1239 10 1 367 304 442 13 92 2 1 1
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 220 1239 10 1 367 304 442 13 92 2 1 1
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 220 1239 10 1 367 304 442 13 92 2 1 1
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 220 1239 10 1 367 304 442 13 92 2 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.97 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.95 0.93 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.07 0.93 1.94 0.06 1.00 0.50 0.25 0.25
Final Sat.: 1750 3670 30 1750 2022 1675 3449 101 1750 875 438 438
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.34 0.34 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.13 0.13 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 31.0 68.9 68.9 7.0 44.8 44.8 26.1 26.1 26.1 10.0 10.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.50 0.61 0.61 0.01 0.50 0.50 0.61 0.61 0.25 0.03 0.03 0.03
Delay/Veh: 40.8 19.0 19.0 55.3 31.2 31.2 45.7 45.7 41.1 52.6 52.6 52.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 40.8 19.0 19.0 55.3 31.2 31.2 45.7 45.7 41.1 52.6 52.6 52.6
LOS by Move: D B-B-E+ C C D D D D-D-D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 15 15 0 10 10 9 9 3 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-110
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #31: Tantau Avenue and Vallco Parkway/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:411 360 1***
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
456*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 1
1
Loss Time (sec):12
0
13 0 Critical V/C:0.515 1!1***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):26.6 0
94 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.8 0 2
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:231 1237***10
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Vallco Parkway/Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 136 522 10 1 234 203 121 13 19 2 1 1
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 136 522 10 1 234 203 121 13 19 2 1 1
Added Vol: 32 707 0 0 74 170 291 0 15 0 0 0
App+Div: 63 8 0 0 52 38 44 0 60 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 231 1237 10 1 360 411 456 13 94 2 1 1
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 231 1237 10 1 360 411 456 13 94 2 1 1
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 231 1237 10 1 360 411 456 13 94 2 1 1
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 231 1237 10 1 360 411 456 13 94 2 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.95 0.05 1.00 0.51 0.23 0.26
Final Sat.: 1750 3767 30 1750 1900 1750 3410 97 1750 893 446 446
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.19 0.23 0.13 0.13 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 26.8 67.5 67.5 7.0 47.7 47.7 27.5 27.5 27.5 10.0 10.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.61 0.60 0.60 0.01 0.49 0.61 0.60 0.60 0.24 0.03 0.03 0.03
Delay/Veh: 46.8 19.7 19.7 55.3 29.2 31.6 44.7 44.7 40.0 52.6 52.6 52.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 46.8 19.7 19.7 55.3 29.2 31.6 44.7 44.7 40.0 52.6 52.6 52.6
LOS by Move: D B-B-E+ C C D D D D-D-D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 8 15 15 0 10 13 9 9 3 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-111
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #31: Tantau Avenue and Vallco Parkway/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:524***361 1
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
475 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 1
1
Loss Time (sec):12
0
13*** 0 Critical V/C:0.646 1!1***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):40.1 0
101 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):31.4 0 2
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:249***1239 10
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Vallco Parkway/Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 136 522 10 1 234 203 121 13 19 2 1 1
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 136 522 10 1 234 203 121 13 19 2 1 1
Added Vol: 50 709 0 0 75 283 310 0 22 0 0 0
App+Div: 63 8 0 0 52 38 44 0 60 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 249 1239 10 1 361 524 475 13 101 2 1 1
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 249 1239 10 1 361 524 475 13 101 2 1 1
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 249 1239 10 1 361 524 475 13 101 2 1 1
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 249 1239 10 1 361 524 475 13 101 2 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.98 0.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.95 0.05 1.00 0.51 0.23 0.26
Final Sat.: 1750 3767 30 1750 1900 1750 3414 93 1750 893 446 446
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.19 0.30 0.14 0.14 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 25.0 66.2 66.2 11.4 52.6 52.6 24.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 10.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.62 0.62 0.01 0.45 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.29 0.03 0.03 0.03
Delay/Veh: 52.5 20.6 20.6 51.2 25.6 31.2 49.8 49.8 42.9 52.6 52.6 52.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 52.5 20.6 20.6 51.2 25.6 31.2 49.8 49.8 42.9 52.6 52.6 52.6
LOS by Move: D-C+ C+ D-C C D D D D-D-D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 15 15 0 9 18 11 11 4 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-112
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #32: Stevens Creek Blvd and Tantau Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:238***0 256
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
349*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
813 2 Critical V/C:0.845 3 1202***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):53.2 0
46 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):47.4 1 140
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Final Vol:93 204 94***
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 75 169 68 79 0 176 184 543 31 125 740 315
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 75 169 68 79 0 176 184 543 31 125 740 315
Added Vol: 1 32 25 64 0 28 94 149 1 13 245 602
App+Div: 17 3 1 113 0 34 71 121 14 2 217 31
Initial Fut: 93 204 94 256 0 238 349 813 46 140 1202 948
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 93 204 94 256 0 238 349 813 46 140 1202 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 93 204 94 256 0 238 349 813 46 140 1202 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 93 204 94 256 0 238 349 813 46 140 1202 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.25 0.50 0.25 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.83 0.17 1.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 434 952 439 3150 0 1750 1750 5370 304 1750 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.08 0.00 0.14 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.08 0.21 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 30.4 30.4 30.4 19.3 0.0 19.3 28.3 38.1 38.1 20.1 29.9 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.50 0.00 0.85 0.85 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.85 0.00
Delay/Veh: 55.9 55.9 55.9 46.8 0.0 69.2 58.5 33.1 33.1 46.4 47.7 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 55.9 55.9 55.9 46.8 0.0 69.2 58.5 33.1 33.1 46.4 47.7 0.0
LOS by Move: E+ E+ E+ D A E E+ C-C-D D A
HCM2kAvgQ: 17 17 17 5 0 10 14 8 8 5 17 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-113
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #32: Stevens Creek Blvd and Tantau Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:238***0 258
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
349*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
809 2 Critical V/C:0.862 3 1238***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):54.7 0
46 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):48.5 1 138
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Final Vol:93 204***93
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 75 169 68 79 0 176 184 543 31 125 740 315
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 75 169 68 79 0 176 184 543 31 125 740 315
Added Vol: 1 32 24 66 0 28 94 145 1 11 281 604
App+Div: 17 3 1 113 0 34 71 121 14 2 217 31
Initial Fut: 93 204 93 258 0 238 349 809 46 138 1238 950
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 93 204 93 258 0 238 349 809 46 138 1238 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 93 204 93 258 0 238 349 809 46 138 1238 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 93 204 93 258 0 238 349 809 46 138 1238 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.24 0.52 0.24 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.83 0.17 1.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 417 915 417 3150 0 1750 1750 5298 301 1750 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.08 0.00 0.14 0.20 0.15 0.15 0.08 0.22 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 31.0 31.0 31.0 18.9 0.0 18.9 27.8 38.3 38.3 19.8 30.2 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.52 0.00 0.86 0.86 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.86 0.00
Delay/Veh: 57.9 57.9 57.9 47.3 0.0 72.3 61.2 33.1 33.1 46.7 48.5 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 57.9 57.9 57.9 47.3 0.0 72.3 61.2 33.1 33.1 46.7 48.5 0.0
LOS by Move: E+ E+ E+ D A E E C-C-D D A
HCM2kAvgQ: 18 18 18 5 0 10 14 8 8 5 17 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-114
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #32: Stevens Creek Blvd and Tantau Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:231***0 259
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
346*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
840 2 Critical V/C:0.903 3 1494***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):57.2 0
46 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):50.3 1 149
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Final Vol:98 204***101
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 75 169 68 79 0 176 184 543 31 125 740 315
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 75 169 68 79 0 176 184 543 31 125 740 315
Added Vol: 6 32 32 67 0 21 91 176 1 22 537 615
App+Div: 17 3 1 113 0 34 71 121 14 2 217 31
Initial Fut: 98 204 101 259 0 231 346 840 46 149 1494 961
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 98 204 101 259 0 231 346 840 46 149 1494 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 98 204 101 259 0 231 346 840 46 149 1494 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 98 204 101 259 0 231 346 840 46 149 1494 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.25 0.49 0.26 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.83 0.17 1.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 443 923 457 3150 0 1750 1750 5380 295 1750 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.08 0.00 0.13 0.20 0.16 0.16 0.09 0.26 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 29.4 29.4 29.4 17.5 0.0 17.5 26.3 39.5 39.5 21.6 34.8 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.56 0.00 0.90 0.90 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.90 0.00
Delay/Veh: 65.3 65.3 65.3 49.3 0.0 82.4 69.6 32.2 32.2 45.3 48.3 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 65.3 65.3 65.3 49.3 0.0 82.4 69.6 32.2 32.2 45.3 48.3 0.0
LOS by Move: E E E D A F E C-C-D D A
HCM2kAvgQ: 19 19 19 5 0 10 15 8 8 6 21 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-115
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #32: Stevens Creek Blvd and Tantau Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:231***0 267
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
349*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
912 2 Critical V/C:0.979 3 1820***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):68.4 0
51 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):58.1 1 170
LOS:E+
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Final Vol:111 204***105
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 75 169 68 79 0 176 184 543 31 125 740 315
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 75 169 68 79 0 176 184 543 31 125 740 315
Added Vol: 19 32 36 75 0 21 94 248 6 43 863 634
App+Div: 17 3 1 113 0 34 71 121 14 2 217 31
Initial Fut: 111 204 105 267 0 231 349 912 51 170 1820 980
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 111 204 105 267 0 231 349 912 51 170 1820 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 111 204 105 267 0 231 349 912 51 170 1820 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 111 204 105 267 0 231 349 912 51 170 1820 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.27 0.47 0.26 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.83 0.17 1.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 481 884 455 3150 0 1750 1750 5374 301 1750 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.08 0.00 0.13 0.20 0.17 0.17 0.10 0.32 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 28.3 28.3 28.3 16.2 0.0 16.2 24.4 40.4 40.4 23.1 39.1 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.63 0.00 0.98 0.98 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.98 0.00
Delay/Veh: 83.5 83.5 83.5 52.1 0.0 104.4 89.5 32.0 32.0 44.5 56.3 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 83.5 83.5 83.5 52.1 0.0 104.4 89.5 32.0 32.0 44.5 56.3 0.0
LOS by Move: F F F D-A F F C C D E+ A
HCM2kAvgQ: 21 21 21 6 0 11 17 9 9 6 28 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-116
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #34: Lawrence Expressway and Homestead Road (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:481 1369 132***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
332*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):190
1 359
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
390 2 Critical V/C:0.969 2 742***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):65.4 0
146 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):59.0 2 426
LOS:E+
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:291 3223***269
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 258 3376 243 106 1365 389 286 322 129 358 583 299
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 258 3376 243 106 1365 389 286 322 129 358 583 299
Added Vol: 31 6 2 0 36 40 5 21 15 11 76 0
App+Div: 2 301 24 26 164 52 41 47 2 57 83 60
Initial Fut: 291 3683 269 132 1565 481 332 390 146 426 742 359
User Adj: 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 291 3223 269 132 1369 481 332 390 146 426 742 359
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 291 3223 269 132 1369 481 332 390 146 426 742 359
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 291 3223 269 132 1369 481 332 390 146 426 742 359
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.57 0.15 0.04 0.24 0.27 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.14 0.20 0.21
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 33.1 111 144.4 8.2 86.0 106.7 20.7 25.4 58.5 33.5 38.3 46.5
Volume/Cap: 0.53 0.97 0.20 0.97 0.53 0.49 0.97 0.77 0.27 0.77 0.97 0.84
Delay/Veh: 72.4 47.5 6.6 158.2 37.7 25.6 124.6 86.3 49.9 80.9 100 81.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 72.4 47.5 6.6 158.2 37.7 25.6 124.6 86.3 49.9 80.9 100 81.8
LOS by Move: E D A F D+ C F F D F F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 58 4 7 18 18 15 12 7 16 26 23
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-117
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #34: Lawrence Expressway and Homestead Road (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:481 1369 132***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
332*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):190
1 359
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
394 2 Critical V/C:0.972 2 753***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):66.3 0
146 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):59.5 2 426
LOS:E+
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:292 3223***269
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 258 3376 243 106 1365 389 286 322 129 358 583 299
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 258 3376 243 106 1365 389 286 322 129 358 583 299
Added Vol: 32 6 2 0 36 40 5 25 15 11 87 0
App+Div: 2 301 24 26 164 52 41 47 2 57 83 60
Initial Fut: 292 3683 269 132 1565 481 332 394 146 426 753 359
User Adj: 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 292 3223 269 132 1369 481 332 394 146 426 753 359
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 292 3223 269 132 1369 481 332 394 146 426 753 359
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 292 3223 269 132 1369 481 332 394 146 426 753 359
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.57 0.15 0.04 0.24 0.27 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.14 0.20 0.21
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 33.0 110 144.1 8.2 85.6 106.2 20.6 25.7 58.8 33.6 38.7 46.9
Volume/Cap: 0.53 0.97 0.20 0.97 0.53 0.49 0.97 0.77 0.27 0.77 0.97 0.83
Delay/Veh: 72.5 48.3 6.6 159.3 37.9 25.9 125.5 86.0 49.7 80.7 101 80.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 72.5 48.3 6.6 159.3 37.9 25.9 125.5 86.0 49.7 80.7 101 80.6
LOS by Move: E D A F D+ C F F D F F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 58 4 7 19 18 15 12 7 15 26 23
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-118
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #34: Lawrence Expressway and Homestead Road (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:489 1374 132***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
333*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):190
1 359
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
415 2 Critical V/C:0.983 2 789***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):69.4 0
150 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):61.4 2 429
LOS:E
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:307 3224***269
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 258 3376 243 106 1365 389 286 322 129 358 583 299
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 258 3376 243 106 1365 389 286 322 129 358 583 299
Added Vol: 47 7 2 0 41 48 6 46 19 14 123 0
App+Div: 2 301 24 26 164 52 41 47 2 57 83 60
Initial Fut: 307 3684 269 132 1570 489 333 415 150 429 789 359
User Adj: 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 307 3224 269 132 1374 489 333 415 150 429 789 359
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 307 3224 269 132 1374 489 333 415 150 429 789 359
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 307 3224 269 132 1374 489 333 415 150 429 789 359
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.57 0.15 0.04 0.24 0.28 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.14 0.21 0.21
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 33.8 109 142.9 8.1 83.6 104.0 20.4 27.0 60.8 33.6 40.1 48.2
Volume/Cap: 0.55 0.98 0.20 0.98 0.55 0.51 0.98 0.77 0.27 0.77 0.98 0.81
Delay/Veh: 72.3 51.4 7.0 163.0 39.5 27.4 128.7 85.2 48.3 81.0 102 77.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 72.3 51.4 7.0 163.0 39.5 27.4 128.7 85.2 48.3 81.0 102 77.1
LOS by Move: E D-A F D C F F D F F E-
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 59 5 7 19 19 15 13 7 16 27 23
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-119
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #34: Lawrence Expressway and Homestead Road (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:498 1379 132***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
336*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):190
1 359
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
429 2 Critical V/C:0.991 2 814***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):71.9 0
152 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):62.9 2 434
LOS:E
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:316 3224***269
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 258 3376 243 106 1365 389 286 322 129 358 583 299
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 258 3376 243 106 1365 389 286 322 129 358 583 299
Added Vol: 56 8 2 0 47 57 9 60 21 19 148 0
App+Div: 2 301 24 26 164 52 41 47 2 57 83 60
Initial Fut: 316 3685 269 132 1576 498 336 429 152 434 814 359
User Adj: 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 316 3224 269 132 1379 498 336 429 152 434 814 359
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 316 3224 269 132 1379 498 336 429 152 434 814 359
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 316 3224 269 132 1379 498 336 429 152 434 814 359
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.57 0.15 0.04 0.24 0.28 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.14 0.21 0.21
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 34.1 108 142.3 8.0 82.3 102.8 20.4 27.7 61.8 33.8 41.1 49.1
Volume/Cap: 0.56 0.99 0.21 0.99 0.56 0.53 0.99 0.77 0.27 0.77 0.99 0.79
Delay/Veh: 72.3 54.0 7.2 166.0 40.5 28.5 131.0 84.9 47.6 81.1 103 75.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 72.3 54.0 7.2 166.0 40.5 28.5 131.0 84.9 47.6 81.1 103 75.1
LOS by Move: E D-A F D C F F D F F E-
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 60 5 7 19 19 16 13 7 16 28 22
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-120
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #36: Stevens Creek Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:227 237 1008***
Lanes:0 1 0 1 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0*** 0
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1013 3 Critical V/C:0.885 3 2576***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):38.3 0
332 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):34.8 2 289
LOS:C-
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:68***0 146
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 68 0 146 761 233 154 0 749 164 222 1189 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 68 0 146 761 233 154 0 749 164 222 1189 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 227 4 0 0 177 62 67 859 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 20 0 73 0 87 106 0 528 0
Initial Fut: 68 0 146 1008 237 227 0 1013 332 289 2576 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 68 0 146 1008 237 227 0 1013 332 289 2576 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 68 0 146 1008 237 227 0 1013 332 289 2576 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 68 0 146 1008 237 227 0 1013 332 289 2576 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.49 0.51 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 3500 931 892 0 5700 1750 3150 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.00 0.08 0.29 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.18 0.19 0.09 0.45 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 26.2 30.4 30.4 30.4 0.0 31.4 41.4 16.2 47.6 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.39 0.00 0.32 0.95 0.84 0.84 0.00 0.57 0.46 0.57 0.95 0.00
Delay/Veh: 43.6 0.0 30.1 46.7 36.3 36.3 0.0 29.0 21.6 40.1 33.3 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 43.6 0.0 30.1 46.7 36.3 36.3 0.0 29.0 21.6 40.1 33.3 0.0
LOS by Move: D A C D D+ D+ A C C+ D C-A
HCM2kAvgQ: 3 0 4 21 16 16 0 9 8 5 24 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-121
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #36: Stevens Creek Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:227 236 1007***
Lanes:0 1 0 1 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0*** 0
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1009 3 Critical V/C:0.887 3 2613***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):38.5 0
331 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):35.0 2 289
LOS:C-
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:68***0 146
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 68 0 146 761 233 154 0 749 164 222 1189 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 68 0 146 761 233 154 0 749 164 222 1189 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 226 3 0 0 173 61 67 896 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 20 0 73 0 87 106 0 528 0
Initial Fut: 68 0 146 1007 236 227 0 1009 331 289 2613 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 68 0 146 1007 236 227 0 1009 331 289 2613 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 68 0 146 1007 236 227 0 1009 331 289 2613 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 68 0 146 1007 236 227 0 1009 331 289 2613 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.51 0.49 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 3551 917 883 0 5700 1750 3150 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.00 0.08 0.28 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.18 0.19 0.09 0.46 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 26.5 29.8 29.8 29.8 0.0 31.7 41.7 16.5 48.2 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.39 0.00 0.32 0.95 0.86 0.86 0.00 0.56 0.45 0.56 0.95 0.00
Delay/Veh: 43.6 0.0 29.9 47.5 38.0 38.0 0.0 28.7 21.4 39.8 33.3 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 43.6 0.0 29.9 47.5 38.0 38.0 0.0 28.7 21.4 39.8 33.3 0.0
LOS by Move: D A C D D+ D+ A C C+ D C-A
HCM2kAvgQ: 3 0 4 21 17 17 0 9 8 4 24 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-122
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #36: Stevens Creek Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:227 239 1008***
Lanes:0 1 0 1 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0*** 0
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1065 3 Critical V/C:0.948 3 2892***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):52.9 0
317 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):44.1 2 289
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:68***0 146
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 68 0 146 761 233 154 0 749 164 222 1189 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 68 0 146 761 233 154 0 749 164 222 1189 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 227 6 0 0 229 47 67 1175 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 20 0 73 0 87 106 0 528 0
Initial Fut: 68 0 146 1008 239 227 0 1065 317 289 2892 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 68 0 146 1008 239 227 0 1065 317 289 2892 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 68 0 146 1008 239 227 0 1065 317 289 2892 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 68 0 146 1008 239 227 0 1065 317 289 2892 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.49 0.51 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 3500 935 888 0 5700 1750 3150 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.00 0.08 0.29 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.19 0.18 0.09 0.51 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 26.4 28.2 28.2 28.2 0.0 33.4 43.4 16.4 49.8 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.39 0.00 0.32 1.02 0.90 0.90 0.00 0.56 0.42 0.56 1.02 0.00
Delay/Veh: 43.6 0.0 30.0 64.6 42.1 42.1 0.0 27.7 20.0 39.9 47.2 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 43.6 0.0 30.0 64.6 42.1 42.1 0.0 27.7 20.0 39.9 47.2 0.0
LOS by Move: D A C E D D A C B-D D A
HCM2kAvgQ: 3 0 4 24 18 18 0 9 7 4 31 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-123
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #36: Stevens Creek Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:227 240 1009***
Lanes:0 1 0 1 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0*** 0
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1100 3 Critical V/C:1.021 3 3257***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):81.1 0
365 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):63.1 2 289
LOS:E
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:68***0 146
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 68 0 146 761 233 154 0 749 164 222 1189 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 68 0 146 761 233 154 0 749 164 222 1189 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 228 7 0 0 264 95 67 1540 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 20 0 73 0 87 106 0 528 0
Initial Fut: 68 0 146 1009 240 227 0 1100 365 289 3257 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 68 0 146 1009 240 227 0 1100 365 289 3257 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 68 0 146 1009 240 227 0 1100 365 289 3257 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 68 0 146 1009 240 227 0 1100 365 289 3257 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.49 0.51 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 3500 937 887 0 5700 1750 3150 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.00 0.08 0.29 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.19 0.21 0.09 0.57 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 26.7 26.2 26.2 26.2 0.0 35.1 45.1 16.7 51.8 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.39 0.00 0.31 1.10 0.98 0.98 0.00 0.55 0.46 0.55 1.10 0.00
Delay/Veh: 43.6 0.0 29.7 94.5 54.9 54.9 0.0 26.4 19.4 39.4 75.9 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 43.6 0.0 29.7 94.5 54.9 54.9 0.0 26.4 19.4 39.4 75.9 0.0
LOS by Move: D A C F D-D-A C B-D E-A
HCM2kAvgQ: 3 0 4 27 21 21 0 9 8 4 43 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-124
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #38: Stevens Creek Blvd/Agilent Drwy (SJ)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Final Vol:138 1***16
Lanes:1 0 1!0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
576*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):160
0 791
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
1543 2 Critical V/C:1.021 3 3626***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):67.1 0
18 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):52.9 1 27
LOS:D-
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:1 0 0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Agilent Drwy Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 1 0 0 2 1 4 245 1394 18 27 2252 402
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 1 0 0 2 1 4 245 1394 18 27 2252 402
Added Vol: 0 0 0 14 0 134 323 80 0 0 872 389
App+Div: 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 69 0 0 502 0
Initial Fut: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1543 18 27 3626 791
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1543 18 27 3626 791
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1543 18 27 3626 791
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1543 18 27 3626 791
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.10 0.01 1.89 1.00 2.96 0.04 1.00 3.23 0.77
Final Sat.: 1750 1900 0 1930 22 3300 1750 5629 66 1750 6145 1340
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.33 0.27 0.27 0.02 0.59 0.59
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 50.5 122 121.6 19.4 90.5 90.5
Volume/Cap: 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.71 0.67 1.04 0.36 0.36 0.13 1.04 1.04
Delay/Veh: 70.4 0.0 0.0 71.0 84.2 80.7 104.8 6.4 6.4 63.0 61.6 61.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 70.4 0.0 0.0 71.0 84.2 80.7 104.8 6.4 6.4 63.0 61.6 61.6
LOS by Move: E A A E F F F A A E E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 1 5 5 36 8 8 1 57 57
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-125
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #38: Stevens Creek Blvd/Agilent Drwy (SJ)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Final Vol:138 1***16
Lanes:1 0 1!0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
576*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):160
0 791
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
1540 2 Critical V/C:1.024 3 3663***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):68.5 0
18 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):54.1 1 27
LOS:D-
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:1 0 0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Agilent Drwy Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 1 0 0 2 1 4 245 1394 18 27 2252 402
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 1 0 0 2 1 4 245 1394 18 27 2252 402
Added Vol: 0 0 0 14 0 134 323 77 0 0 909 389
App+Div: 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 69 0 0 502 0
Initial Fut: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1540 18 27 3663 791
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1540 18 27 3663 791
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1540 18 27 3663 791
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1540 18 27 3663 791
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.11 0.01 1.88 1.00 2.96 0.04 1.00 3.26 0.74
Final Sat.: 1750 1900 0 1934 23 3388 1750 5535 65 1750 6166 1331
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.33 0.28 0.28 0.02 0.59 0.59
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 50.3 122 121.8 19.2 90.7 90.7
Volume/Cap: 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.70 0.65 1.05 0.37 0.37 0.13 1.05 1.05
Delay/Veh: 70.4 0.0 0.0 71.0 82.7 79.6 106.3 6.4 6.4 63.2 63.1 63.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 70.4 0.0 0.0 71.0 82.7 79.6 106.3 6.4 6.4 63.2 63.1 63.1
LOS by Move: E A A E F E-F A A E E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 1 5 5 37 8 8 1 58 58
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-126
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #38: Stevens Creek Blvd/Agilent Drwy (SJ)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Final Vol:138 1***16
Lanes:1 0 1!0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
576*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):160
0 791
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
1596 2 Critical V/C:1.066 3 3945***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):83.6 0
18 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):65.9 1 27
LOS:E
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:1 0 0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Agilent Drwy Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 1 0 0 2 1 4 245 1394 18 27 2252 402
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 1 0 0 2 1 4 245 1394 18 27 2252 402
Added Vol: 0 0 0 14 0 134 323 133 0 0 1191 389
App+Div: 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 69 0 0 502 0
Initial Fut: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1596 18 27 3945 791
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1596 18 27 3945 791
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1596 18 27 3945 791
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1596 18 27 3945 791
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.10 0.01 1.89 1.00 2.96 0.04 1.00 3.28 0.72
Final Sat.: 1750 1900 0 1930 22 3300 1750 5631 64 1750 6241 1251
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.33 0.28 0.28 0.02 0.63 0.63
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 48.3 122 122.1 18.9 92.7 92.7
Volume/Cap: 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.71 0.67 1.09 0.37 0.37 0.13 1.09 1.09
Delay/Veh: 70.4 0.0 0.0 71.0 84.2 80.7 122.0 6.3 6.3 63.5 79.0 79.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 70.4 0.0 0.0 71.0 84.2 80.7 122.0 6.3 6.3 63.5 79.0 79.0
LOS by Move: E A A E F F F A A E E-E-
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 1 5 5 38 8 8 1 67 67
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-127
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #38: Stevens Creek Blvd/Agilent Drwy (SJ)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Final Vol:138 1***16
Lanes:1 0 1!0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
576*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):160
0 791
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
1632 2 Critical V/C:1.117 3 4311***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):104.7 0
18 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):82.9 1 27
LOS:F
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:1 0 0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Agilent Drwy Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 1 0 0 2 1 4 245 1394 18 27 2252 402
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 1 0 0 2 1 4 245 1394 18 27 2252 402
Added Vol: 0 0 0 14 0 134 323 169 0 0 1557 389
App+Div: 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 69 0 0 502 0
Initial Fut: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1632 18 27 4311 791
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1632 18 27 4311 791
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1632 18 27 4311 791
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1632 18 27 4311 791
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.10 0.01 1.89 1.00 2.96 0.04 1.00 3.34 0.66
Final Sat.: 1750 1900 0 1930 22 3300 1750 5633 62 1750 6337 1163
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.33 0.29 0.29 0.02 0.68 0.68
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 46.0 123 122.5 18.5 95.0 95.0
Volume/Cap: 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.71 0.67 1.15 0.38 0.38 0.13 1.15 1.15
Delay/Veh: 70.4 0.0 0.0 71.0 84.2 80.7 143.7 6.2 6.2 63.9 101 101.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 70.4 0.0 0.0 71.0 84.2 80.7 143.7 6.2 6.2 63.9 101 101.0
LOS by Move: E A A E F F F A A E F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 1 5 5 41 9 9 1 79 79
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-128
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #39: Stevens Creek Blvd and Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:750***0 103
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Signal=Permit Signal=Permit
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):6
0
1628 5 Critical V/C:1.137 3 3712***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):95.6 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):72.8 0 0
LOS:E
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 88 0 568 0 1396 0 0 2113 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 88 0 568 0 1396 0 0 2113 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 95 0 0 1223 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 15 0 144 0 137 0 0 376 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 103 0 750 0 1628 0 0 3712 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 103 0 750 0 1628 0 0 3712 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 103 0 750 0 1628 0 0 3712 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 103 0 750 0 1628 0 0 3712 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1750 0 1750 0 9500 0 0 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.2 0.0 45.2 0.0 68.8 0.0 0.0 68.8 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 1.14 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 1.14 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.9 0.0 116.5 0.0 13.2 0.0 0.0 91.4 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.9 0.0 116.5 0.0 13.2 0.0 0.0 91.4 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A C A F A B A A F A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 45 0 6 0 0 60 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-129
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #39: Stevens Creek Blvd and Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:750***0 103
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Signal=Permit Signal=Permit
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):6
0
1624 5 Critical V/C:1.143 3 3749***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):98.4 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):74.9 0 0
LOS:E
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 88 0 568 0 1396 0 0 2113 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 88 0 568 0 1396 0 0 2113 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 91 0 0 1260 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 15 0 144 0 137 0 0 376 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 103 0 750 0 1624 0 0 3749 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 103 0 750 0 1624 0 0 3749 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 103 0 750 0 1624 0 0 3749 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 103 0 750 0 1624 0 0 3749 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1750 0 1750 0 9500 0 0 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.0 0.0 45.0 0.0 69.0 0.0 0.0 69.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 1.14 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 1.14 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 119.3 0.0 13.1 0.0 0.0 94.2 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 119.3 0.0 13.1 0.0 0.0 94.2 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A C A F A B A A F A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 45 0 6 0 0 62 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-130
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #39: Stevens Creek Blvd and Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:749***0 103
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Signal=Permit Signal=Permit
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):6
0
1680 5 Critical V/C:1.195 3 4033***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):119.6 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):90.6 0 0
LOS:F
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 88 0 568 0 1396 0 0 2113 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 88 0 568 0 1396 0 0 2113 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 147 0 0 1544 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 15 0 144 0 137 0 0 376 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 103 0 749 0 1680 0 0 4033 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 103 0 749 0 1680 0 0 4033 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 103 0 749 0 1680 0 0 4033 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 103 0 749 0 1680 0 0 4033 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1750 0 1750 0 9500 0 0 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.0 0.0 43.0 0.0 71.0 0.0 0.0 71.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 1.20 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 1.20 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.4 0.0 141.4 0.0 12.2 0.0 0.0 116 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.4 0.0 141.4 0.0 12.2 0.0 0.0 116 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A C A F A B A A F A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 48 0 6 0 0 73 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-131
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #39: Stevens Creek Blvd and Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:749***0 103
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Signal=Permit Signal=Permit
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):6
0
1716 5 Critical V/C:1.263 3 4398***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):147.9 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):112.4 0 0
LOS:F
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 88 0 568 0 1396 0 0 2113 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 88 0 568 0 1396 0 0 2113 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 183 0 0 1909 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 15 0 144 0 137 0 0 376 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 103 0 749 0 1716 0 0 4398 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 103 0 749 0 1716 0 0 4398 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 103 0 749 0 1716 0 0 4398 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 103 0 749 0 1716 0 0 4398 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1750 0 1750 0 9500 0 0 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 40.7 0.0 73.3 0.0 0.0 73.3 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 1.26 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 1.26 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.0 0.0 171.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 0.0 144 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.0 0.0 171.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 0.0 144 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A C A F A B+ A A F A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 52 0 6 0 0 87 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-132
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #40: Stevens Creek Blvd and NB Lawrence Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:0 0 0
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
618*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 293
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1113 3 Critical V/C:1.014 3 1457***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):61.0 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):53.9 0 0
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 1 0 1 0
Final Vol:2276 767 165***
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: NB Lawrence Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 891 574 165 0 0 0 509 975 0 0 1222 236
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 891 574 165 0 0 0 509 975 0 0 1222 236
Added Vol: 1080 77 0 0 0 0 8 87 0 0 143 0
App+Div: 305 116 0 0 0 0 101 51 0 0 92 57
Initial Fut: 2276 767 165 0 0 0 618 1113 0 0 1457 293
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 2276 767 165 0 0 0 618 1113 0 0 1457 293
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 2276 767 165 0 0 0 618 1113 0 0 1457 293
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 2276 767 165 0 0 0 618 1113 0 0 1457 293
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.98 0.83 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 4685 1579 340 0 0 0 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.17
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 57.5 57.5 57.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.2 53.5 0.0 0.0 30.3 30.3
Volume/Cap: 1.01 1.01 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.44 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.66
Delay/Veh: 50.7 50.7 50.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 88.3 23.0 0.0 0.0 72.0 44.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 50.7 50.7 50.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 88.3 23.0 0.0 0.0 72.0 44.1
LOS by Move: D D D A A A F C A A E D
HCM2kAvgQ: 42 42 42 0 0 0 17 9 0 0 24 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-133
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #40: Stevens Creek Blvd and NB Lawrence Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:0 0 0
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
618*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 293
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1109 3 Critical V/C:1.010 3 1495***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):60.2 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):53.2 0 0
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 1 0 1 0
Final Vol:2275 768 165***
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: NB Lawrence Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 891 574 165 0 0 0 509 975 0 0 1222 236
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 891 574 165 0 0 0 509 975 0 0 1222 236
Added Vol: 1079 78 0 0 0 0 8 83 0 0 181 0
App+Div: 305 116 0 0 0 0 101 51 0 0 92 57
Initial Fut: 2275 768 165 0 0 0 618 1109 0 0 1495 293
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 2275 768 165 0 0 0 618 1109 0 0 1495 293
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 2275 768 165 0 0 0 618 1109 0 0 1495 293
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 2275 768 165 0 0 0 618 1109 0 0 1495 293
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.86 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.91 0.90 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 4778 1613 347 0 0 0 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.17
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 56.5 56.5 56.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.3 54.5 0.0 0.0 31.2 31.2
Volume/Cap: 1.01 1.01 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.43 0.00 0.00 1.01 0.64
Delay/Veh: 50.3 50.3 50.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 87.3 22.3 0.0 0.0 70.4 42.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 50.3 50.3 50.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 87.3 22.3 0.0 0.0 70.4 42.7
LOS by Move: D D D A A A F C+ A A E D
HCM2kAvgQ: 41 41 41 0 0 0 17 9 0 0 25 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-134
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #40: Stevens Creek Blvd and NB Lawrence Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:0 0 0
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
617*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 294
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1167 3 Critical V/C:1.072 3 1608***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):80.1 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):69.2 0 0
LOS:E
Lanes:2 1 0 1 0
Final Vol:2445 776 165***
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: NB Lawrence Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 891 574 165 0 0 0 509 975 0 0 1222 236
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 891 574 165 0 0 0 509 975 0 0 1222 236
Added Vol: 1249 86 0 0 0 0 7 141 0 0 294 1
App+Div: 305 116 0 0 0 0 101 51 0 0 92 57
Initial Fut: 2445 776 165 0 0 0 617 1167 0 0 1608 294
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 2445 776 165 0 0 0 617 1167 0 0 1608 294
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 2445 776 165 0 0 0 617 1167 0 0 1608 294
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 2445 776 165 0 0 0 617 1167 0 0 1608 294
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 3.03 0.79 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 4759 1510 321 0 0 0 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.17
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 57.5 57.5 57.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.9 53.5 0.0 0.0 31.6 31.6
Volume/Cap: 1.07 1.07 1.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.07 0.46 0.00 0.00 1.07 0.64
Delay/Veh: 70.7 70.7 70.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 107.4 23.3 0.0 0.0 89.5 42.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 70.7 70.7 70.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 107.4 23.3 0.0 0.0 89.5 42.2
LOS by Move: E E E A A A F C A A F D
HCM2kAvgQ: 48 48 48 0 0 0 19 10 0 0 29 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-135
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #40: Stevens Creek Blvd and NB Lawrence Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:0 0 0
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
617*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 294
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1202 3 Critical V/C:1.156 3 1705***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):113.3 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):89.4 0 0
LOS:F
Lanes:2 1 0 1 0
Final Vol:2714***782 165
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: NB Lawrence Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 891 574 165 0 0 0 509 975 0 0 1222 236
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 891 574 165 0 0 0 509 975 0 0 1222 236
Added Vol: 1518 92 0 0 0 0 7 176 0 0 391 1
App+Div: 305 116 0 0 0 0 101 51 0 0 92 57
Initial Fut: 2714 782 165 0 0 0 617 1202 0 0 1705 294
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 2714 782 165 0 0 0 617 1202 0 0 1705 294
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 2714 782 165 0 0 0 617 1202 0 0 1705 294
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 2714 782 165 0 0 0 617 1202 0 0 1705 294
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 3.00 0.81 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 4725 1546 326 0 0 0 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.57 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.17
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 59.6 59.6 59.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.3 51.4 0.0 0.0 31.0 31.0
Volume/Cap: 1.16 1.02 1.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.16 0.49 0.00 0.00 1.16 0.65
Delay/Veh: 104.4 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 139.6 25.0 0.0 0.0 123 42.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 104.4 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 139.6 25.0 0.0 0.0 123 42.9
LOS by Move: F D D A A A F C A A F D
HCM2kAvgQ: 60 44 44 0 0 0 21 10 0 0 33 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-136
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #41: Lawrence Expressway and Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 894 680***
Lanes:0 0 2 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Ignore Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
94 0
Cycle Time (sec):160
0 0
1
Loss Time (sec):6
0
427*** 1 Critical V/C:0.999 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):60.7 0
0 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):48.6 0 0
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0 3456***513
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 2702 508 633 826 0 94 283 247 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 2702 508 633 826 0 94 283 247 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 471 0 20 23 0 0 90 43 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 283 5 27 45 0 0 54 54 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 3456 513 680 894 0 94 427 344 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 3456 513 680 894 0 94 427 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 3456 513 680 894 0 94 427 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 3456 513 680 894 0 94 427 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.39 1.61 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 3150 3800 0 675 3067 1750 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.61 0.29 0.22 0.24 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 97.1 97.1 34.6 132 0.0 22.3 22.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.29 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 46.4 17.8 96.9 3.3 0.0 107.9 108 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 46.4 17.8 96.9 3.3 0.0 107.9 108 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D B F A A F F A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 58 14 25 5 0 15 15 0 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-137
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #41: Lawrence Expressway and Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 894 680***
Lanes:0 0 2 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Ignore Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
94*** 0
Cycle Time (sec):160
0 0
1
Loss Time (sec):6
0
426 1 Critical V/C:1.000 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):61.1 0
0 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):49.0 0 0
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0 3457***513
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 2702 508 633 826 0 94 283 247 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 2702 508 633 826 0 94 283 247 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 472 0 20 23 0 0 89 43 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 283 5 27 45 0 0 54 54 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 3457 513 680 894 0 94 426 344 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 3457 513 680 894 0 94 426 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 3457 513 680 894 0 94 426 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 3457 513 680 894 0 94 426 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.95 0.98 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.37 1.63 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 3150 3800 0 669 3031 1750 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.61 0.29 0.22 0.24 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 97.0 97.0 34.5 132 0.0 22.5 22.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.29 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 46.9 17.9 97.4 3.4 0.0 108.3 108 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 46.9 17.9 97.4 3.4 0.0 108.3 108 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D B F A A F F A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 59 14 25 5 0 15 15 0 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-138
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #41: Lawrence Expressway and Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 895 681***
Lanes:0 0 2 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Ignore Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
94*** 0
Cycle Time (sec):160
0 0
1
Loss Time (sec):6
0
418 1 Critical V/C:1.003 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):61.5 0
0 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):49.2 0 0
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0 3493***513
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 2702 508 633 826 0 94 283 247 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 2702 508 633 826 0 94 283 247 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 508 0 21 24 0 0 81 38 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 283 5 27 45 0 0 54 54 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 3493 513 681 895 0 94 418 339 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 3493 513 681 895 0 94 418 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 3493 513 681 895 0 94 418 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 3493 513 681 895 0 94 418 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.39 1.61 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 3150 3800 0 687 3054 1750 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.61 0.29 0.22 0.24 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 97.7 97.7 34.5 132 0.0 21.8 21.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.29 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 47.2 17.5 98.2 3.2 0.0 109.8 110 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 47.2 17.5 98.2 3.2 0.0 109.8 110 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D B F A A F F A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 59 14 26 5 0 15 15 0 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-139
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #41: Lawrence Expressway and Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 895 682***
Lanes:0 0 2 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Ignore Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
94 0
Cycle Time (sec):160
0 0
1
Loss Time (sec):6
0
456*** 1 Critical V/C:1.025 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):67.7 0
0 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):54.3 0 0
LOS:D-
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0 3553***513
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 2702 508 633 826 0 94 283 247 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 2702 508 633 826 0 94 283 247 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 568 0 22 24 0 0 119 50 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 283 5 27 45 0 0 54 54 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 3553 513 682 895 0 94 456 351 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 3553 513 682 895 0 94 456 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 3553 513 682 895 0 94 456 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 3553 513 682 895 0 94 456 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.37 1.63 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 3150 3800 0 640 3105 1750 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.62 0.29 0.22 0.24 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 97.3 97.3 33.8 131 0.0 22.9 22.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.03 0.48 1.03 0.29 0.00 1.03 1.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 53.5 17.7 104.5 3.5 0.0 113.9 114 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 53.5 17.7 104.5 3.5 0.0 113.9 114 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D-B F A A F F A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 62 14 26 5 0 16 16 0 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-140
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #43: Lawrence Expressway and Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:189 659 140***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
797*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):160
1 214
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
423 2 Critical V/C:0.973 2 532***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):67.8 0
136 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):60.5 1 127
LOS:E
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:197 2635***101
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 194 2099 100 119 544 168 719 405 132 127 514 136
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 194 2099 100 119 544 168 719 405 132 127 514 136
Added Vol: 2 371 0 6 50 0 0 11 1 0 11 52
App+Div: 1 165 1 15 65 21 78 7 3 0 7 26
Initial Fut: 197 2635 101 140 659 189 797 423 136 127 532 214
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 197 2635 101 140 659 189 797 423 136 127 532 214
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 197 2635 101 140 659 189 797 423 136 127 532 214
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 197 2635 101 140 659 189 797 423 136 127 532 214
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.46 0.06 0.04 0.12 0.11 0.25 0.11 0.08 0.07 0.14 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 29.3 76.0 101.6 7.3 54.1 95.7 41.6 39.1 68.4 25.5 23.0 23.0
Volume/Cap: 0.34 0.97 0.09 0.97 0.34 0.18 0.97 0.46 0.18 0.46 0.97 0.85
Delay/Veh: 57.3 52.6 11.4 142.7 39.7 14.6 83.4 51.7 28.6 62.1 99.6 89.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 57.3 52.6 11.4 142.7 39.7 14.6 83.4 51.7 28.6 62.1 99.6 89.7
LOS by Move: E+ D-B+ F D B F D-C E F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 43 2 5 8 4 28 9 4 6 17 13
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-141
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #43: Lawrence Expressway and Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:189 659 140***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
797*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):160
1 214
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
421 2 Critical V/C:0.974 2 536***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):68.1 0
136 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):60.7 1 127
LOS:E
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:197 2635***101
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 194 2099 100 119 544 168 719 405 132 127 514 136
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 194 2099 100 119 544 168 719 405 132 127 514 136
Added Vol: 2 371 0 6 50 0 0 9 1 0 15 52
App+Div: 1 165 1 15 65 21 78 7 3 0 7 26
Initial Fut: 197 2635 101 140 659 189 797 421 136 127 536 214
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 197 2635 101 140 659 189 797 421 136 127 536 214
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 197 2635 101 140 659 189 797 421 136 127 536 214
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 197 2635 101 140 659 189 797 421 136 127 536 214
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.46 0.06 0.04 0.12 0.11 0.25 0.11 0.08 0.07 0.14 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 29.2 76.0 101.6 7.3 54.0 95.6 41.6 39.1 68.3 25.6 23.2 23.2
Volume/Cap: 0.34 0.97 0.09 0.97 0.34 0.18 0.97 0.45 0.18 0.45 0.97 0.84
Delay/Veh: 57.4 52.9 11.4 143.1 39.8 14.6 83.7 51.7 28.6 62.0 99.7 88.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 57.4 52.9 11.4 143.1 39.8 14.6 83.7 51.7 28.6 62.0 99.7 88.7
LOS by Move: E+ D-B+ F D B F D-C E F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 44 2 5 8 4 28 9 4 6 17 13
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-142
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #43: Lawrence Expressway and Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:189 652 140***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
797*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):160
1 214
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
424 2 Critical V/C:0.976 2 541***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):68.7 0
136 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):61.1 1 127
LOS:E
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:200 2641***101
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 194 2099 100 119 544 168 719 405 132 127 514 136
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 194 2099 100 119 544 168 719 405 132 127 514 136
Added Vol: 5 377 0 6 43 0 0 12 1 0 20 52
App+Div: 1 165 1 15 65 21 78 7 3 0 7 26
Initial Fut: 200 2641 101 140 652 189 797 424 136 127 541 214
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 200 2641 101 140 652 189 797 424 136 127 541 214
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 200 2641 101 140 652 189 797 424 136 127 541 214
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 200 2641 101 140 652 189 797 424 136 127 541 214
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.46 0.06 0.04 0.11 0.11 0.25 0.11 0.08 0.07 0.14 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 29.7 75.9 101.5 7.3 53.5 95.0 41.5 39.3 69.0 25.5 23.3 23.3
Volume/Cap: 0.34 0.98 0.09 0.98 0.34 0.18 0.98 0.45 0.18 0.45 0.98 0.84
Delay/Veh: 57.0 53.4 11.4 144.0 40.1 14.9 84.5 51.6 28.2 62.1 100 87.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 57.0 53.4 11.4 144.0 40.1 14.9 84.5 51.6 28.2 62.1 100 87.6
LOS by Move: E+ D-B+ F D B F D-C E F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 44 2 5 8 4 28 9 4 6 17 13
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-143
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #43: Lawrence Expressway and Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:189 658 140***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
797*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):160
1 214
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
430 2 Critical V/C:0.987 2 561***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):71.3 0
138 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):62.8 1 127
LOS:E
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:206 2666***101
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 194 2099 100 119 544 168 719 405 132 127 514 136
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 194 2099 100 119 544 168 719 405 132 127 514 136
Added Vol: 11 402 0 6 49 0 0 18 3 0 40 52
App+Div: 1 165 1 15 65 21 78 7 3 0 7 26
Initial Fut: 206 2666 101 140 658 189 797 430 138 127 561 214
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 206 2666 101 140 658 189 797 430 138 127 561 214
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 206 2666 101 140 658 189 797 430 138 127 561 214
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 206 2666 101 140 658 189 797 430 138 127 561 214
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.47 0.06 0.04 0.12 0.11 0.25 0.11 0.08 0.07 0.15 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 30.0 75.8 101.2 7.2 53.0 94.0 41.0 39.6 69.6 25.4 23.9 23.9
Volume/Cap: 0.35 0.99 0.09 0.99 0.35 0.18 0.99 0.46 0.18 0.46 0.99 0.82
Delay/Veh: 56.8 55.9 11.5 147.7 40.6 15.3 87.5 51.5 27.8 62.3 102 83.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 56.8 55.9 11.5 147.7 40.6 15.3 87.5 51.5 27.8 62.3 102 83.8
LOS by Move: E+ E+ B+ F D B F D-C E F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 45 2 5 8 4 29 9 4 6 18 13
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-144
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #94: De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:150 759 0***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
356 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 2***
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 1! Critical V/C:0.471 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):18.9 0
25*** 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):20.2 0 0
LOS:C+
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:51 1771***11
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Rainbow Dr (south)
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 51 1653 11 0 700 149 353 0 25 0 0 2
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 51 1653 11 0 700 149 353 0 25 0 0 2
Added Vol: 0 118 0 0 59 1 3 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 51 1771 11 0 759 150 356 0 25 0 0 2
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 51 1771 11 0 759 150 356 0 25 0 0 2
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 51 1771 11 0 759 150 356 0 25 0 0 2
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 51 1771 11 0 759 150 356 0 25 0 0 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.90 0.87 1.00 0.87 0.92 1.00 0.80
Lanes: 1.00 2.98 0.02 0.00 2.47 0.53 1.88 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1663 5656 35 0 4576 904 3105 0 204 0 0 1514
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.31 0.31 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.2 75.4 75.4 0.0 56.3 56.3 29.6 0.0 29.6 0.0 0.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.20 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.48 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.02
Delay/Veh: 46.1 14.0 14.0 0.0 22.3 22.3 41.1 0.0 41.6 0.0 0.0 52.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 46.1 14.0 14.0 0.0 22.3 22.3 41.1 0.0 41.6 0.0 0.0 52.5
LOS by Move: D B B A C+ C+ D A D A A D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 13 13 0 7 7 7 0 8 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT xxxx RT RT LTR LTR LTR xxxx xxxx R
#LnsInGrps: 1 3 3 0 3 3 2 1 1 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 4 xxxx 4 xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 0.98 0.98 0.99 xxxx 0.99 xxxx xxxx 0.87
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.96 xxxx 0.96 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.87
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.90 0.87 1.00 0.87 0.92 1.00 0.80
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-145
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #94 De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 19.2 75.4 75.4 0.0 56.3 56.3 29.6 0.0 29.6 0.0 0.0 10.0
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 1.7 11.7 11.7 0.0 6.9 6.9 6.1 0.0 6.6 0.0 0.0 0.1
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.75 0.75 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Q2: 0.2 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
HCM2KQueue: 1.9 12.7 12.7 0.0 7.4 7.4 7.0 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 0.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.20 1.17 1.17 1.20 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.20 1.18 1.20 1.20 1.20
HCM2k70thQ: 2.3 14.9 14.9 0.0 8.7 8.7 8.3 0.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.58 1.50 1.50 1.60 1.53 1.53 1.54 1.60 1.53 1.60 1.60 1.60
HCM2k85thQ: 3.0 19.0 19.0 0.0 11.3 11.3 10.8 0.0 11.7 0.0 0.0 0.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.76 1.61 1.61 1.80 1.68 1.68 1.68 1.80 1.67 1.80 1.80 1.80
HCM2k90thQ: 3.4 20.5 20.5 0.0 12.3 12.3 11.8 0.0 12.7 0.0 0.0 0.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 2.04 1.80 1.80 2.10 1.90 1.90 1.91 2.10 1.89 2.10 2.10 2.10
HCM2k95thQ: 3.9 22.8 22.8 0.0 14.0 14.0 13.3 0.0 14.4 0.0 0.0 0.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.56 2.08 2.08 2.70 2.27 2.27 2.28 2.70 2.26 2.70 2.70 2.69
HCM2k98thQ: 4.9 26.4 26.4 0.0 16.7 16.7 16.0 0.0 17.2 0.0 0.0 0.2
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #94 De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 11.1 252 1.6 0.0 124 24.6 76.6 0.0 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 81.382 pounds
13.184 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 253.913 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 19.535 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 3.459 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.732 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 81.382 pounds
13.184 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 253.913 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 19.535 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 3.459 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.732 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-146
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #94: De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:150 796 0***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
356 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 2***
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 1! Critical V/C:0.477 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):18.3 0
25*** 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):19.6 0 0
LOS:B-
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:51 1808***11
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Rainbow Dr (south)
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 51 1653 11 0 700 149 353 0 25 0 0 2
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 51 1653 11 0 700 149 353 0 25 0 0 2
Added Vol: 0 155 0 0 96 1 3 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 51 1808 11 0 796 150 356 0 25 0 0 2
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 51 1808 11 0 796 150 356 0 25 0 0 2
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 51 1808 11 0 796 150 356 0 25 0 0 2
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 51 1808 11 0 796 150 356 0 25 0 0 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.98 0.02 0.00 2.51 0.49 1.88 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 5566 34 0 4711 888 3284 0 216 0 0 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.32 0.32 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.4 77.4 77.4 0.0 58.0 58.0 27.6 0.0 27.6 0.0 0.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.19 0.52 0.52 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.49 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.01
Delay/Veh: 45.8 13.1 13.1 0.0 21.2 21.2 42.5 0.0 43.0 0.0 0.0 52.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 45.8 13.1 13.1 0.0 21.2 21.2 42.5 0.0 43.0 0.0 0.0 52.5
LOS by Move: D B B A C+ C+ D A D A A D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 13 13 0 8 8 7 0 8 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-147
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #94: De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:150 875 0***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
356 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 2***
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 1! Critical V/C:0.494 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):18.6 0
25*** 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):19.7 0 0
LOS:B-
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:51 1890***11
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Rainbow Dr (south)
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 51 1653 11 0 700 149 353 0 25 0 0 2
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 51 1653 11 0 700 149 353 0 25 0 0 2
Added Vol: 0 237 0 0 175 1 3 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 51 1890 11 0 875 150 356 0 25 0 0 2
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 51 1890 11 0 875 150 356 0 25 0 0 2
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 51 1890 11 0 875 150 356 0 25 0 0 2
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 51 1890 11 0 875 150 356 0 25 0 0 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.90 0.87 1.00 0.87 0.92 1.00 0.80
Lanes: 1.00 2.98 0.02 0.00 2.53 0.47 1.88 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1663 5659 33 0 4700 806 3105 0 204 0 0 1514
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.11 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 17.9 76.8 76.8 0.0 58.9 58.9 28.2 0.0 28.2 0.0 0.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.21 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.39 0.39 0.50 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.02
Delay/Veh: 47.3 13.7 13.7 0.0 21.1 21.1 42.3 0.0 43.0 0.0 0.0 52.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 47.3 13.7 13.7 0.0 21.1 21.1 42.3 0.0 43.0 0.0 0.0 52.5
LOS by Move: D B B A C+ C+ D A D A A D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 14 14 0 8 8 7 0 8 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT xxxx RT RT LTR LTR LTR xxxx xxxx R
#LnsInGrps: 1 3 3 0 3 3 2 1 1 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 4 xxxx 4 xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 0.98 0.98 0.99 xxxx 0.99 xxxx xxxx 0.87
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.96 xxxx 0.96 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.87
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.90 0.87 1.00 0.87 0.92 1.00 0.80
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-148
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #94 De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 17.9 76.8 76.8 0.0 58.9 58.9 28.2 0.0 28.2 0.0 0.0 10.0
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 1.7 12.5 12.5 0.0 7.7 7.7 6.2 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.1
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.77 0.77 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Q2: 0.3 1.2 1.2 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
HCM2KQueue: 2.0 13.6 13.6 0.0 8.2 8.2 7.2 0.0 7.8 0.0 0.0 0.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.20 1.17 1.17 1.20 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.20 1.18 1.20 1.20 1.20
HCM2k70thQ: 2.3 16.0 16.0 0.0 9.7 9.7 8.5 0.0 9.2 0.0 0.0 0.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.58 1.49 1.49 1.60 1.53 1.53 1.54 1.60 1.53 1.60 1.60 1.60
HCM2k85thQ: 3.1 20.3 20.3 0.0 12.5 12.5 11.0 0.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 0.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.76 1.60 1.60 1.80 1.67 1.67 1.68 1.80 1.67 1.80 1.80 1.80
HCM2k90thQ: 3.4 21.8 21.8 0.0 13.6 13.6 12.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 2.04 1.78 1.78 2.10 1.88 1.88 1.90 2.10 1.89 2.10 2.10 2.10
HCM2k95thQ: 4.0 24.3 24.3 0.0 15.4 15.4 13.6 0.0 14.7 0.0 0.0 0.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.56 2.05 2.05 2.70 2.23 2.23 2.28 2.70 2.25 2.70 2.70 2.69
HCM2k98thQ: 5.0 28.0 28.0 0.0 18.3 18.3 16.3 0.0 17.5 0.0 0.0 0.2
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #94 De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 11.3 270 1.6 0.0 141 24.2 77.7 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 86.257 pounds
13.974 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 269.121 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 20.650 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 3.639 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.780 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 86.257 pounds
13.974 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 269.121 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 20.650 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 3.639 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.780 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-149
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #94: De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:150 913 0***
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
356 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 2***
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 1! Critical V/C:0.507 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):18.5 0
25*** 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):19.5 0 0
LOS:B-
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:51 1960***11
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Rainbow Dr (south)
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 51 1653 11 0 700 149 353 0 25 0 0 2
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 51 1653 11 0 700 149 353 0 25 0 0 2
Added Vol: 0 307 0 0 213 1 3 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 51 1960 11 0 913 150 356 0 25 0 0 2
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 51 1960 11 0 913 150 356 0 25 0 0 2
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 51 1960 11 0 913 150 356 0 25 0 0 2
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 51 1960 11 0 913 150 356 0 25 0 0 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.90 0.87 1.00 0.87 0.92 1.00 0.80
Lanes: 1.00 2.98 0.02 0.00 2.55 0.45 1.88 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1663 5660 32 0 4736 778 3105 0 204 0 0 1514
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.35 0.35 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.11 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 17.6 77.5 77.5 0.0 60.0 60.0 27.5 0.0 27.5 0.0 0.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.22 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.52 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.02
Delay/Veh: 47.6 13.5 13.5 0.0 20.6 20.6 43.1 0.0 43.8 0.0 0.0 52.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 47.6 13.5 13.5 0.0 20.6 20.6 43.1 0.0 43.8 0.0 0.0 52.5
LOS by Move: D B B A C+ C+ D A D A A D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 14 14 0 8 8 7 0 8 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT xxxx RT RT LTR LTR LTR xxxx xxxx R
#LnsInGrps: 1 3 3 0 3 3 2 1 1 0 0 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 4 xxxx 4 xxxx xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 0.98 0.98 0.99 xxxx 0.99 xxxx xxxx 0.87
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.96 xxxx 0.96 xxxx xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.87
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.90 0.87 1.00 0.87 0.92 1.00 0.80
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-150
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #94 De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 17.6 77.5 77.5 0.0 60.0 60.0 27.5 0.0 27.5 0.0 0.0 10.0
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 1.7 13.0 13.0 0.0 7.9 7.9 6.2 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.1
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.78 0.78 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00
Q2: 0.3 1.2 1.2 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
HCM2KQueue: 2.0 14.2 14.2 0.0 8.4 8.4 7.3 0.0 7.9 0.0 0.0 0.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.20 1.17 1.17 1.20 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.20 1.18 1.20 1.20 1.20
HCM2k70thQ: 2.3 16.6 16.6 0.0 9.9 9.9 8.6 0.0 9.4 0.0 0.0 0.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.58 1.49 1.49 1.60 1.53 1.53 1.54 1.60 1.53 1.60 1.60 1.60
HCM2k85thQ: 3.1 21.1 21.1 0.0 12.8 12.8 11.2 0.0 12.1 0.0 0.0 0.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.76 1.60 1.60 1.80 1.66 1.66 1.68 1.80 1.67 1.80 1.80 1.80
HCM2k90thQ: 3.5 22.7 22.7 0.0 14.0 14.0 12.2 0.0 13.2 0.0 0.0 0.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 2.04 1.77 1.77 2.10 1.88 1.88 1.90 2.10 1.89 2.10 2.10 2.10
HCM2k95thQ: 4.0 25.2 25.2 0.0 15.8 15.8 13.8 0.0 14.9 0.0 0.0 0.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.56 2.04 2.04 2.70 2.22 2.22 2.27 2.70 2.24 2.70 2.70 2.69
HCM2k98thQ: 5.0 28.9 28.9 0.0 18.7 18.7 16.5 0.0 17.8 0.0 0.0 0.2
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #94 De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 11.3 281 1.6 0.0 146 24.0 78.3 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 88.399 pounds
14.321 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 275.805 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 21.135 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 3.715 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.802 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 88.399 pounds
14.321 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 275.805 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 21.135 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 3.715 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.802 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-151
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #95: Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:59 24 91***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
8 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 24
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
726*** 2 Critical V/C:0.599 1 760
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):39.3 0
123 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):31.0 2 579***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Final Vol:156 15***626
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Bubb Rd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 154 15 566 90 24 59 8 574 122 559 712 24
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 154 15 566 90 24 59 8 574 122 559 712 24
Added Vol: 2 0 60 1 0 0 0 152 1 20 48 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 156 15 626 91 24 59 8 726 123 579 760 24
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 156 15 626 91 24 59 8 726 123 579 760 24
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 156 15 626 91 24 59 8 726 123 579 760 24
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 156 15 626 91 24 59 8 726 123 579 760 24
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 0.96 0.70 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.79 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.92 0.08 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.93 0.07
Final Sat.: 1537 148 2677 1663 1900 1488 1663 3800 1488 2992 3656 115
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.10 0.23 0.05 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.19 0.08 0.19 0.21 0.21
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 21.0 21.0 61.1 11.3 11.3 11.3 17.0 39.6 39.6 40.1 62.6 62.6
Volume/Cap: 0.60 0.60 0.47 0.60 0.14 0.43 0.04 0.60 0.26 0.60 0.41 0.41
Delay/Veh: 51.1 51.1 21.1 60.6 52.2 55.5 46.4 36.4 31.6 36.3 19.3 19.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 51.1 51.1 21.1 60.6 52.2 55.5 46.4 36.4 31.6 36.3 19.3 19.3
LOS by Move: D-D-C+ E D-E+ D D+ C D+ B-B-
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 7 9 5 1 3 0 11 4 11 9 9
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0
Lane Group: LT LT R L T R L T R L RT RT
#LnsInGrps: 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 4 4 xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 1.00 1.00
LT Adj: 0.96 0.96 xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 0.96 0.70 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.79 1.00 0.92
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-152
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #95 Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 21.0 21.0 61.1 11.3 11.3 11.3 17.0 39.6 39.6 40.1 62.6 62.6
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 5.9 5.9 8.6 3.3 0.8 2.1 0.3 10.5 3.4 10.1 8.5 8.5
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.56 0.56 0.56
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.80 0.80
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 0.62 0.56 0.49 0.65 0.65
Q2: 1.4 1.4 0.9 1.3 0.2 0.7 0.0 0.9 0.2 0.7 0.5 0.5
HCM2KQueue: 7.2 7.2 9.5 4.6 0.9 2.8 0.3 11.4 3.6 10.8 8.9 8.9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.19 1.20 1.18 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.18
HCM2k70thQ: 8.6 8.6 11.2 5.4 1.1 3.3 0.3 13.4 4.3 12.7 10.5 10.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.54 1.54 1.52 1.56 1.59 1.57 1.60 1.51 1.57 1.51 1.52 1.52
HCM2k85thQ: 11.1 11.1 14.4 7.1 1.5 4.4 0.4 17.2 5.7 16.3 13.6 13.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.68 1.68 1.65 1.72 1.78 1.75 1.79 1.63 1.73 1.63 1.66 1.66
HCM2k90thQ: 12.2 12.2 15.7 7.8 1.6 4.9 0.5 18.6 6.3 17.6 14.8 14.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.90 1.90 1.85 1.97 2.07 2.01 2.09 1.82 1.99 1.83 1.87 1.87
HCM2k95thQ: 13.8 13.8 17.6 9.0 1.9 5.6 0.6 20.8 7.2 19.8 16.6 16.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.27 2.27 2.18 2.40 2.63 2.51 2.68 2.12 2.46 2.14 2.20 2.20
HCM2k98thQ: 16.5 16.5 20.7 11.0 2.4 7.0 0.7 24.2 8.9 23.1 19.6 19.6
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #95 Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 36.0 3.5 103.6 21.9 5.5 14.0 1.7 153 22.8 121.5 119 3.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 107.888 pounds
17.478 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 336.610 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 26.940 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 5.096 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.905 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 107.888 pounds
17.478 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 336.610 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 26.940 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 5.096 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.905 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-153
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #95: Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:59 24 91***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
8 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 24
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
714*** 2 Critical V/C:0.601 1 766
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):38.8 0
125 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):30.3 2 657***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Final Vol:155***15 588
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Bubb Rd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 154 15 566 90 24 59 8 574 122 559 712 24
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 154 15 566 90 24 59 8 574 122 559 712 24
Added Vol: 1 0 22 1 0 0 0 140 3 98 54 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 155 15 588 91 24 59 8 714 125 657 766 24
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 155 15 588 91 24 59 8 714 125 657 766 24
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 155 15 588 91 24 59 8 714 125 657 766 24
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 155 15 588 91 24 59 8 714 125 657 766 24
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.97 0.95
Lanes: 0.91 0.09 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.94 0.06
Final Sat.: 1641 159 3150 1750 1900 1750 1750 3800 1750 3150 3588 112
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.09 0.19 0.05 0.01 0.03 0.00 0.19 0.07 0.21 0.21 0.21
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.5 19.5 62.5 10.7 10.7 10.7 17.1 38.8 38.8 43.0 64.7 64.7
Volume/Cap: 0.60 0.60 0.37 0.60 0.15 0.39 0.03 0.60 0.23 0.60 0.41 0.41
Delay/Veh: 52.2 52.2 18.9 61.2 52.8 55.2 46.3 36.9 31.8 34.3 18.2 18.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 52.2 52.2 18.9 61.2 52.8 55.2 46.3 36.9 31.8 34.3 18.2 18.2
LOS by Move: D-D-B-E D-E+ D D+ C C-B-B-
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 7 8 5 1 3 0 11 4 12 9 9
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-154
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #95: Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:59 24 91***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
8 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 24
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
794*** 2 Critical V/C:0.678 1 805
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):40.6 0
128 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):31.3 2 742***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Final Vol:155 15***604
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Bubb Rd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 154 15 566 90 24 59 8 574 122 559 712 24
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 154 15 566 90 24 59 8 574 122 559 712 24
Added Vol: 1 0 38 1 0 0 0 220 6 183 93 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 155 15 604 91 24 59 8 794 128 742 805 24
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 155 15 604 91 24 59 8 794 128 742 805 24
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 155 15 604 91 24 59 8 794 128 742 805 24
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 155 15 604 91 24 59 8 794 128 742 805 24
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 0.96 0.70 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.79 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.92 0.08 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.94 0.06
Final Sat.: 1536 149 2677 1663 1900 1488 1663 3800 1488 2992 3666 109
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.10 0.23 0.05 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.21 0.09 0.25 0.22 0.22
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 18.5 18.5 63.8 10.0 10.0 10.0 17.1 38.2 38.2 45.3 66.5 66.5
Volume/Cap: 0.68 0.68 0.44 0.68 0.16 0.49 0.03 0.68 0.28 0.68 0.41 0.41
Delay/Veh: 57.2 57.2 19.1 68.5 53.5 57.7 46.4 39.1 32.8 34.9 17.2 17.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 57.2 57.2 19.1 68.5 53.5 57.7 46.4 39.1 32.8 34.9 17.2 17.2
LOS by Move: E+ E+ B-E D-E+ D D C-C-B B
HCM2kAvgQ: 8 8 9 5 1 3 0 13 4 14 9 9
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0
Lane Group: LT LT R L T R L T R L RT RT
#LnsInGrps: 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 4 4 xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 1.00 1.00
LT Adj: 0.96 0.96 xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 0.96 0.70 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.79 1.00 0.92
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-155
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #95 Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 18.5 18.5 63.8 10.0 10.0 10.0 17.1 38.2 38.2 45.3 66.5 66.5
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 6.0 6.0 7.9 3.3 0.8 2.1 0.3 12.0 3.6 13.0 8.5 8.5
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.67 0.67 0.67
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.68 0.68 0.68
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 0.60 0.54 0.45 0.58 0.58
Q2: 1.8 1.8 0.8 1.6 0.2 0.9 0.0 1.2 0.2 0.9 0.4 0.4
HCM2KQueue: 7.8 7.8 8.6 5.0 1.0 3.0 0.3 13.2 3.8 13.9 8.9 8.9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.19 1.20 1.17 1.19 1.17 1.18 1.18
HCM2k70thQ: 9.2 9.2 10.2 5.9 1.1 3.6 0.3 15.4 4.6 16.3 10.5 10.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.53 1.53 1.52 1.55 1.59 1.57 1.60 1.49 1.56 1.49 1.52 1.52
HCM2k85thQ: 11.9 11.9 13.2 7.7 1.5 4.7 0.4 19.7 6.0 20.7 13.6 13.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.67 1.67 1.66 1.71 1.78 1.74 1.79 1.61 1.73 1.60 1.66 1.66
HCM2k90thQ: 13.0 13.0 14.3 8.5 1.7 5.2 0.5 21.2 6.6 22.3 14.8 14.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.89 1.89 1.87 1.96 2.07 2.01 2.09 1.79 1.98 1.78 1.87 1.87
HCM2k95thQ: 14.7 14.7 16.2 9.7 2.0 6.0 0.6 23.5 7.6 24.7 16.6 16.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.25 2.25 2.21 2.38 2.63 2.49 2.68 2.06 2.44 2.04 2.20 2.20
HCM2k98thQ: 17.5 17.5 19.1 11.8 2.5 7.4 0.7 27.2 9.4 28.4 19.6 19.6
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #95 Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 36.7 3.6 94.7 22.1 5.6 14.1 1.7 174 24.2 156.5 120 3.6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 117.500 pounds
19.035 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 366.600 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 29.370 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 5.566 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.983 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 117.500 pounds
19.035 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 366.600 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 29.370 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 5.566 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.983 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-156
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #95: Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:59 24 100***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
8 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 27
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
818*** 2 Critical V/C:0.706 1 822
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):41.6 0
129 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):31.9 2 782***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Final Vol:155 15***610
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Bubb Rd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 154 15 566 90 24 59 8 574 122 559 712 24
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 154 15 566 90 24 59 8 574 122 559 712 24
Added Vol: 1 0 44 10 0 0 0 244 7 223 110 3
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 155 15 610 100 24 59 8 818 129 782 822 27
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 155 15 610 100 24 59 8 818 129 782 822 27
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 155 15 610 100 24 59 8 818 129 782 822 27
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 155 15 610 100 24 59 8 818 129 782 822 27
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 0.96 0.70 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.79 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.92 0.08 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.93 0.07
Final Sat.: 1536 149 2677 1663 1900 1488 1663 3800 1488 2992 3651 120
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.10 0.23 0.06 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.22 0.09 0.26 0.23 0.23
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 17.7 17.7 63.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 16.8 37.8 37.8 45.9 66.9 66.9
Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.71 0.44 0.71 0.15 0.47 0.04 0.71 0.28 0.71 0.42 0.42
Delay/Veh: 59.9 59.9 19.3 70.2 53.0 56.7 46.6 40.2 33.1 35.4 17.1 17.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 59.9 59.9 19.3 70.2 53.0 56.7 46.6 40.2 33.1 35.4 17.1 17.1
LOS by Move: E+ E+ B-E D-E+ D D C-D+ B B
HCM2kAvgQ: 8 8 9 5 1 3 0 14 4 15 9 9
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0
Lane Group: LT LT R L T R L T R L RT RT
#LnsInGrps: 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 4 4 xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 1.00 1.00
LT Adj: 0.96 0.96 xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 0.96 0.70 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.79 1.00 0.92
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-157
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #95 Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 17.7 17.7 63.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 16.8 37.8 37.8 45.9 66.9 66.9
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 6.0 6.0 8.0 3.6 0.8 2.1 0.3 12.5 3.7 13.9 8.7 8.7
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.70 0.70 0.70
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.65 0.65 0.65
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.35 0.59 0.54 0.43 0.55 0.55
Q2: 2.0 2.0 0.8 1.8 0.2 0.8 0.0 1.3 0.2 1.0 0.4 0.4
HCM2KQueue: 8.0 8.0 8.8 5.5 0.9 2.9 0.3 13.8 3.9 14.8 9.1 9.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.19 1.20 1.17 1.19 1.17 1.18 1.18
HCM2k70thQ: 9.5 9.5 10.4 6.5 1.1 3.5 0.3 16.2 4.6 17.4 10.7 10.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.53 1.53 1.52 1.55 1.59 1.57 1.60 1.49 1.56 1.48 1.52 1.52
HCM2k85thQ: 12.2 12.2 13.4 8.5 1.5 4.6 0.4 20.6 6.1 22.0 13.8 13.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.67 1.67 1.66 1.70 1.78 1.75 1.79 1.60 1.73 1.59 1.65 1.65
HCM2k90thQ: 13.4 13.4 14.6 9.3 1.7 5.1 0.5 22.1 6.7 23.6 15.1 15.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.88 1.88 1.87 1.94 2.07 2.01 2.09 1.78 1.98 1.76 1.86 1.86
HCM2k95thQ: 15.1 15.1 16.4 10.6 1.9 5.8 0.6 24.6 7.7 26.2 16.9 16.9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.24 2.24 2.21 2.36 2.63 2.50 2.68 2.05 2.44 2.02 2.20 2.20
HCM2k98thQ: 17.9 17.9 19.4 12.9 2.5 7.3 0.7 28.3 9.5 30.0 20.0 20.0
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #95 Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 36.9 3.6 96.2 24.3 5.6 14.1 1.7 181 24.5 166.7 122 4.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 122.432 pounds
19.834 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 381.988 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 30.652 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 5.823 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.021 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 122.432 pounds
19.834 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 381.988 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 30.652 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 5.823 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.021 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-158
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #96: N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 215 179***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
61*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 177
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
321 2 Critical V/C:0.565 2 539***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):36.0 0
131 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):38.5 1 155
LOS:D+
Lanes:2 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:368 563***227
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd Homestead Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 334 563 146 179 214 69 61 279 116 140 518 177
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 334 563 146 179 214 69 61 279 116 140 518 177
Added Vol: 34 0 81 0 1 0 0 42 15 15 21 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 368 563 227 179 215 69 61 321 131 155 539 177
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 368 563 227 179 215 0 61 321 131 155 539 177
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 368 563 227 179 215 0 61 321 131 155 539 177
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 368 563 227 179 215 0 61 321 131 155 539 177
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.79 0.96 0.88 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78
Lanes: 2.00 1.39 0.61 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 2992 2529 1020 1663 1900 1750 1663 3800 1488 1663 3800 1488
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.22 0.22 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.09 0.09 0.14 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 36.5 47.2 47.2 22.9 33.6 0.0 7.8 18.4 18.4 19.5 30.1 30.1
Volume/Cap: 0.40 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.40 0.00 0.57 0.55 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.47
Delay/Veh: 33.4 28.9 28.9 46.4 35.6 0.0 61.3 48.1 50.7 49.4 40.0 39.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 33.4 28.9 28.9 46.4 35.6 0.0 61.3 48.1 50.7 49.4 40.0 39.2
LOS by Move: C-C C D D+ A E D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 12 12 7 6 0 3 6 6 6 9 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L T R
#LnsInGrps: 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 0.96 0.96 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.79 0.96 0.88 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-159
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #96 N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 36.5 47.2 47.2 22.9 33.6 0.0 7.8 18.4 18.4 19.5 30.1 30.1
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 5.9 10.5 10.5 5.9 5.8 0.0 2.1 4.9 4.4 5.2 7.8 5.4
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2: 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.2 0.7 0.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 0.9
HCM2KQueue: 6.5 11.8 11.8 7.1 6.5 0.0 3.3 6.1 5.6 6.4 9.1 6.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.18 1.17 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.19
HCM2k70thQ: 7.7 13.8 13.8 8.4 7.7 0.0 3.9 7.2 6.7 7.6 10.7 7.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.54 1.50 1.50 1.54 1.54 1.60 1.57 1.54 1.55 1.54 1.52 1.54
HCM2k85thQ: 10.1 17.7 17.7 10.9 10.0 0.0 5.1 9.4 8.7 9.9 13.8 9.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.69 1.62 1.62 1.68 1.69 1.80 1.74 1.69 1.70 1.69 1.65 1.69
HCM2k90thQ: 11.0 19.1 19.1 11.9 11.0 0.0 5.7 10.3 9.6 10.9 15.0 10.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.92 1.81 1.81 1.90 1.92 2.10 2.00 1.93 1.94 1.92 1.86 1.92
HCM2k95thQ: 12.5 21.3 21.3 13.5 12.4 0.0 6.5 11.7 10.9 12.3 16.9 12.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.30 2.10 2.10 2.28 2.31 2.70 2.48 2.33 2.35 2.31 2.20 2.31
HCM2k98thQ: 15.1 24.8 24.8 16.2 15.0 0.0 8.1 14.2 13.2 14.9 20.0 14.6
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #96 N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 73.0 110 44.3 40.6 43.6 0.0 14.8 74.2 30.4 35.8 118 37.6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 115.360 pounds
18.688 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 359.924 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 29.327 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 5.704 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.935 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 115.360 pounds
18.688 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 359.924 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 29.327 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 5.704 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.935 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-160
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #96: N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 215 179***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
61*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 177
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
345 2 Critical V/C:0.556 2 566***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):35.7 0
133 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):38.1 1 166
LOS:D+
Lanes:2 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:369 563***229
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd Homestead Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 334 563 146 179 214 69 61 279 116 140 518 177
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 334 563 146 179 214 69 61 279 116 140 518 177
Added Vol: 35 0 83 0 1 0 0 66 17 26 48 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 369 563 229 179 215 69 61 345 133 166 566 177
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 369 563 229 179 215 0 61 345 133 166 566 177
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 369 563 229 179 215 0 61 345 133 166 566 177
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 369 563 229 179 215 0 61 345 133 166 566 177
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 1.41 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 2629 1069 1750 1900 1750 1750 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.21 0.21 0.10 0.11 0.00 0.03 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.15 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 34.7 46.2 46.2 22.1 33.6 0.0 7.5 19.4 19.4 20.3 32.2 32.2
Volume/Cap: 0.40 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.40 0.00 0.56 0.56 0.47 0.56 0.56 0.38
Delay/Veh: 34.6 29.3 29.3 46.6 35.6 0.0 60.8 47.6 46.9 48.2 38.5 36.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 34.6 29.3 29.3 46.6 35.6 0.0 60.8 47.6 46.9 48.2 38.5 36.3
LOS by Move: C-C C D D+ A E D D D D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 12 12 7 6 0 3 6 5 7 9 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-161
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #96: N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 215 180***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
61 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 178
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
435*** 2 Critical V/C:0.625 2 599
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):40.3 0
143 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):39.8 1 186***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:380 563***244
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd Homestead Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 334 563 146 179 214 69 61 279 116 140 518 177
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 334 563 146 179 214 69 61 279 116 140 518 177
Added Vol: 46 0 98 1 1 0 0 156 27 46 81 1
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 380 563 244 180 215 69 61 435 143 186 599 178
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 380 563 244 180 215 0 61 435 143 186 599 178
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 380 563 244 180 215 0 61 435 143 186 599 178
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 380 563 244 180 215 0 61 435 143 186 599 178
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.79 0.96 0.88 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78
Lanes: 2.00 1.36 0.64 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 2992 2468 1070 1663 1900 1750 1663 3800 1488 1663 3800 1488
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.23 0.23 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.04 0.11 0.10 0.11 0.16 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 34.1 43.8 43.8 20.8 30.4 0.0 11.7 22.0 22.0 21.5 31.7 31.7
Volume/Cap: 0.45 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.45 0.00 0.38 0.63 0.53 0.63 0.60 0.45
Delay/Veh: 35.6 32.3 32.3 50.3 38.4 0.0 52.2 47.0 46.2 49.7 39.5 37.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 35.6 32.3 32.3 50.3 38.4 0.0 52.2 47.0 46.2 49.7 39.5 37.7
LOS by Move: D+ C-C-D D+ A D-D D D D D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 13 13 8 7 0 3 8 6 8 10 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L T R
#LnsInGrps: 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 0.96 0.96 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.79 0.96 0.88 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-162
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #96 N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 34.1 43.8 43.8 20.8 30.4 0.0 11.7 22.0 22.0 21.5 31.7 31.7
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 6.3 11.4 11.4 6.0 6.0 0.0 2.1 6.7 4.7 6.2 8.7 5.4
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2: 0.8 1.6 1.6 1.5 0.8 0.0 0.6 1.5 1.0 1.5 1.4 0.8
HCM2KQueue: 7.1 12.9 12.9 7.6 6.8 0.0 2.6 8.2 5.7 7.7 10.1 6.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.18 1.17 1.17 1.18 1.18 1.20 1.19 1.18 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.19
HCM2k70thQ: 8.3 15.2 15.2 8.9 8.1 0.0 3.2 9.7 6.8 9.2 11.9 7.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.54 1.49 1.49 1.53 1.54 1.60 1.57 1.53 1.55 1.53 1.51 1.54
HCM2k85thQ: 10.8 19.3 19.3 11.6 10.5 0.0 4.2 12.6 8.9 11.9 15.3 9.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.68 1.61 1.61 1.67 1.68 1.80 1.75 1.67 1.70 1.67 1.64 1.69
HCM2k90thQ: 11.9 20.8 20.8 12.6 11.5 0.0 4.6 13.7 9.7 12.9 16.6 10.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.91 1.79 1.79 1.89 1.91 2.10 2.02 1.88 1.94 1.89 1.84 1.93
HCM2k95thQ: 13.4 23.2 23.2 14.3 13.0 0.0 5.3 15.4 11.1 14.6 18.6 11.9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.28 2.07 2.07 2.26 2.29 2.70 2.52 2.23 2.34 2.25 2.16 2.32
HCM2k98thQ: 16.1 26.8 26.8 17.1 15.6 0.0 6.7 18.3 13.4 17.4 21.9 14.4
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #96 N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 77.9 116 50.2 41.7 45.2 0.0 14.3 100 32.3 43.0 131 37.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 128.148 pounds
20.760 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 399.823 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 32.662 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 6.376 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.034 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 128.148 pounds
20.760 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 399.823 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 32.662 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 6.376 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.034 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-163
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #96: N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 215 181***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
61 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 180
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
467*** 2 Critical V/C:0.637 2 623
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):40.8 0
143 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):39.9 1 188***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:380 563***245
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd Homestead Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 334 563 146 179 214 69 61 279 116 140 518 177
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 334 563 146 179 214 69 61 279 116 140 518 177
Added Vol: 46 0 99 2 1 0 0 188 27 48 105 3
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 380 563 245 181 215 69 61 467 143 188 623 180
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 380 563 245 181 215 0 61 467 143 188 623 180
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 380 563 245 181 215 0 61 467 143 188 623 180
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 380 563 245 181 215 0 61 467 143 188 623 180
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.79 0.96 0.88 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78
Lanes: 2.00 1.36 0.64 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 2992 2465 1073 1663 1900 1750 1663 3800 1488 1663 3800 1488
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.23 0.23 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.04 0.12 0.10 0.11 0.16 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 33.6 43.0 43.0 20.5 29.9 0.0 11.7 23.2 23.2 21.3 32.8 32.8
Volume/Cap: 0.45 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.45 0.00 0.38 0.64 0.50 0.64 0.60 0.44
Delay/Veh: 36.0 33.1 33.1 51.0 38.8 0.0 52.2 46.4 44.6 50.3 38.9 36.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 36.0 33.1 33.1 51.0 38.8 0.0 52.2 46.4 44.6 50.3 38.9 36.8
LOS by Move: D+ C-C-D-D+ A D-D D D D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 13 13 8 7 0 3 9 6 8 10 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L T R
#LnsInGrps: 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 0.96 0.96 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.79 0.96 0.88 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-164
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #96 N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 33.6 43.0 43.0 20.5 29.9 0.0 11.7 23.2 23.2 21.3 32.8 32.8
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 6.3 11.5 11.5 6.1 6.1 0.0 2.1 7.2 4.6 6.3 9.0 5.4
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2: 0.8 1.7 1.7 1.6 0.8 0.0 0.6 1.6 0.9 1.6 1.4 0.8
HCM2KQueue: 7.1 13.1 13.1 7.7 6.9 0.0 2.7 8.8 5.6 7.9 10.4 6.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.18 1.17 1.17 1.18 1.18 1.20 1.19 1.18 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.19
HCM2k70thQ: 8.4 15.4 15.4 9.1 8.1 0.0 3.2 10.3 6.6 9.3 12.3 7.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.54 1.49 1.49 1.53 1.54 1.60 1.57 1.52 1.55 1.53 1.51 1.54
HCM2k85thQ: 10.9 19.6 19.6 11.8 10.6 0.0 4.2 13.4 8.6 12.1 15.8 9.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.68 1.61 1.61 1.67 1.68 1.80 1.75 1.66 1.70 1.67 1.64 1.69
HCM2k90thQ: 11.9 21.1 21.1 12.8 11.6 0.0 4.6 14.5 9.5 13.2 17.1 10.4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.90 1.79 1.79 1.89 1.91 2.10 2.02 1.87 1.94 1.89 1.84 1.93
HCM2k95thQ: 13.5 23.5 23.5 14.5 13.1 0.0 5.3 16.4 10.8 14.9 19.2 11.9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.28 2.06 2.06 2.25 2.29 2.70 2.52 2.21 2.35 2.24 2.15 2.32
HCM2k98thQ: 16.2 27.1 27.1 17.3 15.7 0.0 6.7 19.4 13.1 17.7 22.4 14.3
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #96 N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 78.3 117 50.9 42.1 45.5 0.0 14.3 107 31.9 43.6 135 37.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 130.868 pounds
21.201 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 408.307 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 33.360 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 6.514 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.056 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 130.868 pounds
21.201 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 408.307 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 33.360 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 6.514 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.056 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-165
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #131: Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:123 82 145***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
162*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 113
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
788 2 Critical V/C:0.642 2 1355***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):34.9 0
35 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):34.1 1 79
LOS:C-
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Final Vol:114 149 195***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 114 141 178 89 81 120 113 557 35 75 1235 76
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 114 141 178 89 81 120 113 557 35 75 1235 76
Added Vol: 0 8 17 56 1 3 49 231 0 4 120 37
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 114 149 195 145 82 123 162 788 35 79 1355 113
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 114 149 195 145 82 123 162 788 35 79 1355 113
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 114 149 195 145 82 123 162 788 35 79 1355 113
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 114 149 195 145 82 123 162 788 35 79 1355 113
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 0.99 0.92 0.88 0.99 0.91
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.86 0.14 1.00 2.75 0.25
Final Sat.: 1663 1900 1488 1663 1900 1488 1663 5405 240 1663 5164 431
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.08 0.13 0.09 0.04 0.08 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.26 0.26
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 18.4 24.5 24.5 16.3 22.4 22.4 18.2 48.0 48.0 19.2 49.0 49.0
Volume/Cap: 0.45 0.38 0.64 0.64 0.23 0.44 0.64 0.36 0.36 0.30 0.64 0.64
Delay/Veh: 47.4 41.9 48.4 55.3 41.8 44.4 53.4 25.4 25.4 45.1 29.1 29.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 47.4 41.9 48.4 55.3 41.8 44.4 53.4 25.4 25.4 45.1 29.1 29.1
LOS by Move: D D D E+ D D D-C C D C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 5 8 7 3 5 7 7 7 3 14 14
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0
Lane Group: L T R L T R L RT RT L RT RT
#LnsInGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 3 3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx 0.99 0.99
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.99 0.99
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 0.99 0.92 0.88 0.99 0.91
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-166
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #131 Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 18.4 24.5 24.5 16.3 22.4 22.4 18.2 48.0 48.0 19.2 49.0 49.0
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 3.7 4.3 6.5 5.0 2.3 3.9 5.5 6.4 6.4 2.5 13.2 13.2
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.87 0.87
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.38
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.15 0.26 0.26
Q2: 0.8 0.6 1.6 1.6 0.3 0.8 1.6 0.6 0.6 0.1 0.5 0.5
HCM2KQueue: 4.5 4.9 8.1 6.5 2.6 4.7 7.1 7.0 7.0 2.6 13.6 13.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.17 1.17
HCM2k70thQ: 5.4 5.8 9.6 7.7 3.1 5.6 8.4 8.3 8.3 3.1 16.0 16.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.56 1.55 1.53 1.54 1.57 1.56 1.54 1.54 1.54 1.58 1.49 1.49
HCM2k85thQ: 7.1 7.6 12.4 10.1 4.1 7.3 10.9 10.8 10.8 4.1 20.3 20.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.72 1.71 1.67 1.69 1.75 1.72 1.68 1.68 1.68 1.75 1.60 1.60
HCM2k90thQ: 7.8 8.4 13.5 11.0 4.6 8.1 11.9 11.8 11.8 4.5 21.8 21.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.97 1.96 1.88 1.92 2.02 1.96 1.90 1.91 1.91 2.02 1.78 1.78
HCM2k95thQ: 8.9 9.6 15.2 12.5 5.3 9.3 13.5 13.4 13.4 5.2 24.3 24.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.41 2.39 2.24 2.30 2.52 2.40 2.28 2.28 2.28 2.52 2.05 2.05
HCM2k98thQ: 10.9 11.7 18.1 15.1 6.6 11.3 16.2 16.0 16.0 6.5 28.0 28.0
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #131 Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 25.9 32.2 44.7 34.3 17.4 27.3 38.1 138 6.1 17.4 272 22.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 120.622 pounds
19.541 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 376.340 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 30.362 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 5.812 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.001 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 120.622 pounds
19.541 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 376.340 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 30.362 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 5.812 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.001 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-167
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #131: Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:123 82 145***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
172*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 119
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
794 2 Critical V/C:0.624 2 1382***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):33.4 0
35 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):32.9 1 79
LOS:C-
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Final Vol:114 149 196***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 114 141 178 89 81 120 113 557 35 75 1235 76
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 114 141 178 89 81 120 113 557 35 75 1235 76
Added Vol: 0 8 18 56 1 3 59 237 0 4 147 43
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 114 149 196 145 82 123 172 794 35 79 1382 119
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 114 149 196 145 82 123 172 794 35 79 1382 119
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 114 149 196 145 82 123 172 794 35 79 1382 119
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 114 149 196 145 82 123 172 794 35 79 1382 119
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.87 0.13 1.00 2.75 0.25
Final Sat.: 1750 1900 1750 1750 1900 1750 1750 5363 236 1750 5155 444
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.08 0.11 0.08 0.04 0.07 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.27 0.27
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 16.5 21.6 21.6 15.9 21.0 21.0 18.9 50.6 50.6 19.9 51.6 51.6
Volume/Cap: 0.48 0.44 0.62 0.62 0.25 0.40 0.62 0.35 0.35 0.27 0.62 0.62
Delay/Veh: 49.3 44.7 49.3 54.4 43.0 44.7 51.6 23.7 23.7 44.2 27.2 27.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 49.3 44.7 49.3 54.4 43.0 44.7 51.6 23.7 23.7 44.2 27.2 27.2
LOS by Move: D D D D-D D D-C C D C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 5 8 6 3 5 7 7 7 3 14 14
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-168
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #131: Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:133 84 239***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
213*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 146
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
927 2 Critical V/C:0.759 2 1451***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):41.2 0
35 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):37.8 1 68
LOS:D+
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Final Vol:114 152 186***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 114 141 178 89 81 120 113 557 35 75 1235 76
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 114 141 178 89 81 120 113 557 35 75 1235 76
Added Vol: 0 11 8 150 3 13 100 370 0 -7 216 70
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 114 152 186 239 84 133 213 927 35 68 1451 146
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 114 152 186 239 84 133 213 927 35 68 1451 146
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 114 152 186 239 84 133 213 927 35 68 1451 146
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 114 152 186 239 84 133 213 927 35 68 1451 146
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.99 0.91
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.88 0.12 1.00 2.70 0.30
Final Sat.: 1663 1900 1488 1663 1900 1488 1663 5448 206 1663 5067 510
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.08 0.13 0.14 0.04 0.09 0.13 0.17 0.17 0.04 0.29 0.29
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 18.4 19.8 19.8 22.7 24.0 24.0 20.3 48.8 48.8 16.7 45.3 45.3
Volume/Cap: 0.45 0.49 0.76 0.76 0.22 0.45 0.76 0.42 0.42 0.29 0.76 0.76
Delay/Veh: 47.4 46.7 60.7 56.3 40.4 43.2 59.0 25.6 25.6 47.0 34.3 34.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 47.4 46.7 60.7 56.3 40.4 43.2 59.0 25.6 25.6 47.0 34.3 34.3
LOS by Move: D D E E+ D D E+ C C D C-C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 6 9 11 3 5 10 8 8 2 16 16
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0
Lane Group: L T R L T R L RT RT L RT RT
#LnsInGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 3 3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: << < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 0.99 0.99
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 0.99
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.99 0.91
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-169
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #131 Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 18.4 19.8 19.8 22.7 24.0 24.0 20.3 48.8 48.8 16.7 45.3 45.3
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 3.7 4.6 6.4 8.2 2.3 4.2 7.3 7.7 7.7 2.2 15.6 15.6
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.88 0.88 0.88
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.35
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.13 0.23 0.23
Q2: 0.8 0.9 2.4 2.5 0.3 0.8 2.5 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.7 0.7
HCM2KQueue: 4.5 5.5 8.8 10.7 2.6 5.0 9.8 8.4 8.4 2.3 16.3 16.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.17 1.17
HCM2k70thQ: 5.4 6.5 10.4 12.6 3.1 5.9 11.6 9.9 9.9 2.7 19.0 19.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.56 1.55 1.52 1.51 1.57 1.55 1.52 1.53 1.53 1.58 1.47 1.47
HCM2k85thQ: 7.0 8.5 13.5 16.2 4.1 7.8 14.9 12.8 12.8 3.6 24.1 24.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.72 1.70 1.66 1.63 1.75 1.71 1.64 1.66 1.66 1.76 1.58 1.58
HCM2k90thQ: 7.8 9.4 14.7 17.5 4.6 8.6 16.2 13.9 13.9 4.0 25.7 25.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.97 1.94 1.87 1.83 2.02 1.95 1.85 1.88 1.88 2.03 1.74 1.74
HCM2k95thQ: 8.9 10.7 16.5 19.6 5.3 9.8 18.2 15.7 15.7 4.6 28.4 28.4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.41 2.35 2.21 2.14 2.52 2.38 2.17 2.22 2.22 2.54 1.98 1.98
HCM2k98thQ: 10.9 13.0 19.5 22.9 6.6 11.9 21.3 18.6 18.6 5.7 32.4 32.4
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #131 Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 25.9 34.5 44.4 56.6 17.6 29.2 50.8 166 6.3 15.3 317 31.9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 145.306 pounds
23.540 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 453.354 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 36.880 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 7.152 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.185 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 145.306 pounds
23.540 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 453.354 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 36.880 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 7.152 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.185 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-170
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #131: Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:138 84 301***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
228*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 160
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1100 2 Critical V/C:0.836 2 1513***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):46.8 0
35 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):40.9 1 71
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Final Vol:114 153 200***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 114 141 178 89 81 120 113 557 35 75 1235 76
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 114 141 178 89 81 120 113 557 35 75 1235 76
Added Vol: 0 12 22 212 3 18 115 543 0 -4 278 84
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 114 153 200 301 84 138 228 1100 35 71 1513 160
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 114 153 200 301 84 138 228 1100 35 71 1513 160
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 114 153 200 301 84 138 228 1100 35 71 1513 160
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 114 153 200 301 84 138 228 1100 35 71 1513 160
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.99 0.91
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.90 0.10 1.00 2.69 0.31
Final Sat.: 1663 1900 1488 1663 1900 1488 1663 5482 174 1663 5041 533
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.08 0.13 0.18 0.04 0.09 0.14 0.20 0.20 0.04 0.30 0.30
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.2 19.3 19.3 26.0 26.0 26.0 19.7 48.6 48.6 14.1 43.1 43.1
Volume/Cap: 0.43 0.50 0.84 0.84 0.20 0.43 0.84 0.50 0.50 0.36 0.84 0.84
Delay/Veh: 46.5 47.3 70.7 60.6 38.7 41.5 68.3 26.7 26.7 49.9 38.5 38.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 46.5 47.3 70.7 60.6 38.7 41.5 68.3 26.7 26.7 49.9 38.5 38.5
LOS by Move: D D E E D+ D E C C D D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 6 10 14 3 5 11 10 10 2 18 18
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0
Lane Group: L T R L T R L RT RT L RT RT
#LnsInGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 3 3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 0.99 0.99
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 0.99
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.99 0.91
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-171
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #131 Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 19.2 19.3 19.3 26.0 26.0 26.0 19.7 48.6 48.6 14.1 43.1 43.1
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 3.7 4.7 7.0 10.4 2.3 4.3 8.0 9.4 9.4 2.4 17.2 17.2
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 0.98 0.98
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.13
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 0.09 0.09
Q2: 0.7 1.0 3.2 3.5 0.3 0.7 3.3 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.4 0.4
HCM2KQueue: 4.4 5.6 10.2 14.0 2.5 5.0 11.3 10.4 10.4 2.4 17.6 17.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.17 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.16 1.16
HCM2k70thQ: 5.3 6.7 12.0 16.3 3.0 6.0 13.3 12.2 12.2 2.9 20.5 20.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.56 1.55 1.51 1.49 1.58 1.55 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.58 1.47 1.47
HCM2k85thQ: 6.9 8.7 15.5 20.8 4.0 7.8 17.0 15.7 15.7 3.8 25.8 25.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.72 1.70 1.64 1.60 1.75 1.71 1.63 1.64 1.64 1.75 1.57 1.57
HCM2k90thQ: 7.6 9.6 16.7 22.3 4.5 8.6 18.4 17.0 17.0 4.2 27.6 27.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.97 1.94 1.84 1.78 2.02 1.95 1.82 1.84 1.84 2.03 1.73 1.73
HCM2k95thQ: 8.7 10.9 18.8 24.8 5.2 9.8 20.6 19.1 19.1 4.8 30.4 30.4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.41 2.35 2.16 2.04 2.52 2.38 2.12 2.15 2.15 2.53 1.96 1.96
HCM2k98thQ: 10.7 13.2 22.0 28.5 6.4 12.0 24.0 22.3 22.3 6.1 34.5 34.5
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #131 Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 25.7 34.9 48.5 72.0 17.2 29.8 55.2 205 6.5 16.4 347 36.6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 168.165 pounds
27.243 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 524.674 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 42.953 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 8.414 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.350 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 168.165 pounds
27.243 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 524.674 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 42.953 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 8.414 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.350 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-172
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #1030: Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:102 296 284***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
195*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):100
1 601***
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
147 0 Critical V/C:0.902 1 68
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):55.2 0
34 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):48.7 1 105
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:14 537***112
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Foothill Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 14 537 101 257 296 101 195 73 34 102 43 592
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 14 537 101 257 296 101 195 73 34 102 43 592
Added Vol: 0 0 11 27 0 1 0 74 0 3 25 9
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 14 537 112 284 296 102 195 147 34 105 68 601
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 14 537 112 284 296 102 195 147 34 105 68 601
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 14 537 112 284 296 102 195 147 34 105 68 601
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 14 537 112 284 296 102 195 147 34 105 68 601
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 0.97 0.90 0.79 1.00 0.78 0.88 0.97 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.78
Lanes: 1.00 1.63 0.37 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.20 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1663 3018 629 2992 1900 1488 1663 1476 341 1663 1900 1488
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.18 0.18 0.09 0.16 0.07 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.06 0.04 0.40
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 9.4 19.7 19.7 10.5 20.9 20.9 13.0 34.0 34.0 23.8 44.8 44.8
Volume/Cap: 0.09 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.75 0.33 0.90 0.29 0.29 0.27 0.08 0.90
Delay/Veh: 41.7 53.9 53.9 71.7 44.7 34.2 78.7 24.5 24.5 31.4 15.9 41.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.7 53.9 53.9 71.7 44.7 34.2 78.7 24.5 24.5 31.4 15.9 41.2
LOS by Move: D D-D-E D C-E-C C C B D
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 13 13 8 10 3 10 4 4 3 1 21
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L RT RT L T R
#LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 0.97 0.97 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.97 0.97 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.97 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.97 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.85
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 0.97 0.90 0.79 1.00 0.78 0.88 0.97 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.78
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-173
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1030 Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 9.4 19.7 19.7 10.5 20.9 20.9 13.0 34.0 34.0 23.8 44.8 44.8
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 0.4 8.9 8.9 4.7 7.7 2.6 5.8 3.7 3.7 2.6 1.1 16.8
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.07
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.44 0.67 0.60
Q2: 0.1 4.6 4.6 3.6 2.5 0.5 3.9 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.1 3.9
HCM2KQueue: 0.5 13.5 13.5 8.3 10.2 3.1 9.7 4.2 4.2 2.7 1.1 20.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.20 1.17 1.17 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.18 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.20 1.16
HCM2k70thQ: 0.6 15.8 15.8 9.8 12.0 3.7 11.4 4.9 4.9 3.3 1.4 24.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.60 1.49 1.49 1.53 1.51 1.57 1.52 1.56 1.56 1.57 1.59 1.45
HCM2k85thQ: 0.8 20.1 20.1 12.7 15.4 4.9 14.7 6.5 6.5 4.3 1.8 30.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.79 1.60 1.60 1.66 1.64 1.74 1.65 1.72 1.72 1.75 1.78 1.54
HCM2k90thQ: 0.9 21.6 21.6 13.8 16.7 5.4 16.0 7.2 7.2 4.8 2.0 31.9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 2.08 1.78 1.78 1.88 1.84 2.01 1.85 1.98 1.98 2.02 2.06 1.69
HCM2k95thQ: 1.0 24.1 24.1 15.6 18.7 6.2 18.0 8.2 8.2 5.5 2.4 35.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.66 2.05 2.05 2.23 2.16 2.49 2.17 2.43 2.43 2.51 2.62 1.90
HCM2k98thQ: 1.3 27.7 27.7 18.5 21.9 7.7 21.1 10.1 10.1 6.9 3.0 39.4
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1030 Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 3.2 131 27.3 70.2 69.4 21.7 48.0 26.9 6.2 21.4 9.7 139.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 116.109 pounds
18.810 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 362.259 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 30.038 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 6.005 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.899 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 116.109 pounds
18.810 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 362.259 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 30.038 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 6.005 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.899 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-174
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #1030: Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:101 296 267***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
195*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):100
1 596***
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
156 0 Critical V/C:0.809 1 69
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):43.6 0
34 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):40.2 1 105
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:14 537***112
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Foothill Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 14 537 101 257 296 101 195 73 34 102 43 592
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 14 537 101 257 296 101 195 73 34 102 43 592
Added Vol: 0 0 11 10 0 0 0 83 0 3 26 4
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 14 537 112 267 296 101 195 156 34 105 69 596
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 14 537 112 267 296 101 195 156 34 105 69 596
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 14 537 112 267 296 101 195 156 34 105 69 596
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 14 537 112 267 296 101 195 156 34 105 69 596
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.65 0.35 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 3061 638 3150 1900 1750 1750 1478 322 1750 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.18 0.18 0.08 0.16 0.06 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.04 0.34
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 21.7 21.7 10.5 22.2 22.2 13.8 33.6 33.6 22.3 42.1 42.1
Volume/Cap: 0.08 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.70 0.26 0.81 0.31 0.31 0.27 0.09 0.81
Delay/Veh: 41.1 43.4 43.4 57.6 41.1 32.5 60.0 25.0 25.0 32.5 17.5 32.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.1 43.4 43.4 57.6 41.1 32.5 60.0 25.0 25.0 32.5 17.5 32.1
LOS by Move: D D D E+ D C-E C C C-B C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 12 12 7 10 3 9 5 5 3 1 18
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-175
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #1030: Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:102 296 298***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
195*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):100
1 606***
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
197 0 Critical V/C:0.913 1 87
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):57.0 0
34 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):49.2 1 107
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:14 537***116
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Foothill Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 14 537 101 257 296 101 195 73 34 102 43 592
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 14 537 101 257 296 101 195 73 34 102 43 592
Added Vol: 0 0 15 41 0 1 0 124 0 5 44 14
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 14 537 116 298 296 102 195 197 34 107 87 606
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 14 537 116 298 296 102 195 197 34 107 87 606
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 14 537 116 298 296 102 195 197 34 107 87 606
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 14 537 116 298 296 102 195 197 34 107 87 606
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 0.97 0.90 0.79 1.00 0.78 0.88 0.98 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.78
Lanes: 1.00 1.62 0.38 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1663 2995 647 2992 1900 1488 1663 1565 270 1663 1900 1488
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.18 0.18 0.10 0.16 0.07 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.06 0.05 0.41
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 9.5 19.6 19.6 10.9 21.1 21.1 12.8 36.9 36.9 20.5 44.6 44.6
Volume/Cap: 0.09 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.74 0.33 0.91 0.34 0.34 0.31 0.10 0.91
Delay/Veh: 41.6 55.5 55.5 72.8 44.0 34.0 81.5 23.1 23.1 34.3 16.1 43.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.6 55.5 55.5 72.8 44.0 34.0 81.5 23.1 23.1 34.3 16.1 43.0
LOS by Move: D E+ E+ E D C-F C C C-B D
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 14 14 9 10 3 10 5 5 3 1 21
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L RT RT L T R
#LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 0.97 0.97 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.98 0.98 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.97 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.85
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 0.97 0.90 0.79 1.00 0.78 0.88 0.98 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.78
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-176
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1030 Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 9.5 19.6 19.6 10.9 21.1 21.1 12.8 36.9 36.9 20.5 44.6 44.6
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 0.4 9.0 9.0 4.9 7.7 2.6 5.8 4.7 4.7 2.7 1.4 17.1
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.12
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.40 0.66 0.60
Q2: 0.1 4.8 4.8 3.8 2.4 0.5 4.0 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.1 4.1
HCM2KQueue: 0.5 13.8 13.8 8.7 10.1 3.1 9.8 5.2 5.2 2.9 1.5 21.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.20 1.17 1.17 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.18 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.20 1.16
HCM2k70thQ: 0.6 16.1 16.1 10.3 11.9 3.7 11.6 6.2 6.2 3.5 1.8 24.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.60 1.49 1.49 1.52 1.51 1.57 1.52 1.55 1.55 1.57 1.59 1.45
HCM2k85thQ: 0.8 20.5 20.5 13.3 15.3 4.8 14.9 8.1 8.1 4.6 2.3 30.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.79 1.60 1.60 1.66 1.64 1.74 1.64 1.71 1.71 1.75 1.77 1.54
HCM2k90thQ: 0.9 22.1 22.1 14.5 16.6 5.4 16.2 8.9 8.9 5.1 2.6 32.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 2.08 1.78 1.78 1.87 1.84 2.01 1.85 1.95 1.95 2.01 2.05 1.68
HCM2k95thQ: 1.0 24.5 24.5 16.3 18.6 6.2 18.2 10.1 10.1 5.9 3.0 35.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.66 2.05 2.05 2.21 2.16 2.49 2.17 2.37 2.37 2.50 2.59 1.90
HCM2k98thQ: 1.3 28.2 28.2 19.3 21.8 7.7 21.4 12.3 12.3 7.3 3.8 40.2
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1030 Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 3.2 131 28.4 73.7 69.2 21.6 48.1 35.5 6.1 22.7 12.6 141.6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 121.327 pounds
19.655 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 378.539 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 31.411 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 6.287 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.937 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 121.327 pounds
19.655 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 378.539 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 31.411 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 6.287 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.937 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-177
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #1030: Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:102 296 298***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
195*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):100
1 606***
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
218 0 Critical V/C:0.913 1 95
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):57.0 0
34 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):48.9 1 107
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:14 537***116
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Foothill Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 14 537 101 257 296 101 195 73 34 102 43 592
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 14 537 101 257 296 101 195 73 34 102 43 592
Added Vol: 0 0 15 41 0 1 0 145 0 5 52 14
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 14 537 116 298 296 102 195 218 34 107 95 606
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 14 537 116 298 296 102 195 218 34 107 95 606
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 14 537 116 298 296 102 195 218 34 107 95 606
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 14 537 116 298 296 102 195 218 34 107 95 606
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 0.97 0.90 0.79 1.00 0.78 0.88 0.98 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.78
Lanes: 1.00 1.62 0.38 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.14 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1663 2995 647 2992 1900 1488 1663 1592 248 1663 1900 1488
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.18 0.18 0.10 0.16 0.07 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.06 0.05 0.41
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 9.5 19.6 19.6 10.9 21.1 21.1 12.8 38.0 38.0 19.4 44.6 44.6
Volume/Cap: 0.09 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.74 0.33 0.91 0.36 0.36 0.33 0.11 0.91
Delay/Veh: 41.6 55.5 55.5 72.8 44.0 34.0 81.5 22.6 22.6 35.3 16.2 43.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.6 55.5 55.5 72.8 44.0 34.0 81.5 22.6 22.6 35.3 16.2 43.0
LOS by Move: D E+ E+ E D C-F C+ C+ D+ B D
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 14 14 9 10 3 10 6 6 3 2 21
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L RT RT L T R
#LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 0.97 0.97 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.98 0.98 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.97 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.85
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 0.97 0.90 0.79 1.00 0.78 0.88 0.98 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.78
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-178
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1030 Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 9.5 19.6 19.6 10.9 21.1 21.1 12.8 38.0 38.0 19.4 44.6 44.6
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 0.4 9.0 9.0 4.9 7.7 2.6 5.8 5.1 5.1 2.8 1.5 17.1
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.14
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.39 0.66 0.60
Q2: 0.1 4.8 4.8 3.8 2.4 0.5 4.0 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.1 4.1
HCM2KQueue: 0.5 13.8 13.8 8.7 10.1 3.1 9.8 5.6 5.6 3.0 1.6 21.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.20 1.17 1.17 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.18 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.20 1.16
HCM2k70thQ: 0.6 16.1 16.1 10.3 11.9 3.7 11.6 6.7 6.7 3.5 1.9 24.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.60 1.49 1.49 1.52 1.51 1.57 1.52 1.55 1.55 1.57 1.58 1.45
HCM2k85thQ: 0.8 20.5 20.5 13.3 15.3 4.8 14.9 8.7 8.7 4.7 2.6 30.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.79 1.60 1.60 1.66 1.64 1.74 1.64 1.70 1.70 1.74 1.77 1.54
HCM2k90thQ: 0.9 22.1 22.1 14.5 16.6 5.4 16.2 9.6 9.6 5.2 2.9 32.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 2.08 1.78 1.78 1.87 1.84 2.01 1.85 1.94 1.94 2.01 2.05 1.68
HCM2k95thQ: 1.0 24.5 24.5 16.3 18.6 6.2 18.2 10.9 10.9 6.0 3.3 35.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.66 2.05 2.05 2.21 2.16 2.49 2.17 2.35 2.35 2.50 2.58 1.90
HCM2k98thQ: 1.3 28.2 28.2 19.3 21.8 7.7 21.4 13.2 13.2 7.4 4.2 40.2
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1030 Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 3.2 131 28.4 73.7 69.2 21.6 48.1 39.1 6.1 23.0 13.8 141.6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 122.102 pounds
19.780 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 380.957 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 31.597 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 6.320 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.944 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 122.102 pounds
19.780 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 380.957 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 31.597 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 6.320 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.944 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-179
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM
Intersection #1031: Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:100***74 96
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
253*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):90
1 150
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
307 0 Critical V/C:0.637 1 358***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):34.4 0
57 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):32.1 1 61
LOS:C-
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:247***543 54
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd McClellan Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 247 519 36 85 71 100 253 307 57 55 358 129
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 247 519 36 85 71 100 253 307 57 55 358 129
Added Vol: 0 24 18 11 3 0 0 0 0 6 0 21
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 247 543 54 96 74 100 253 307 57 61 358 150
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 247 543 54 96 74 100 253 307 57 61 358 150
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 247 543 54 96 74 100 253 307 57 61 358 150
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 247 543 54 96 74 100 253 307 57 61 358 150
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 0.99 0.91 0.88 0.91 0.84 0.88 0.98 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.78
Lanes: 1.00 1.81 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1663 3385 337 1663 1737 1600 1663 1543 287 1663 1900 1488
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.04 0.19 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 20.7 20.6 20.6 10.0 10.0 10.0 21.2 34.0 34.0 13.3 26.2 26.2
Volume/Cap: 0.65 0.70 0.70 0.52 0.38 0.56 0.65 0.53 0.53 0.25 0.65 0.35
Delay/Veh: 35.2 34.4 34.4 40.3 37.7 40.3 34.8 22.5 22.5 34.5 30.6 25.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 35.2 34.4 34.4 40.3 37.7 40.3 34.8 22.5 22.5 34.5 30.6 25.6
LOS by Move: D+ C-C-D D+ D C-C+ C+ C-C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 8 9 9 3 2 4 7 8 8 2 10 4
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT L RT RT L RT RT L T R
#LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx 0.91 0.91 xxxx 0.98 0.98 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.85
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 0.99 0.91 0.88 0.91 0.84 0.88 0.98 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.78
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-180
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1031 Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 20.7 20.6 20.6 10.0 10.0 10.0 21.2 34.0 34.0 13.3 26.2 26.2
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 6.1 6.9 6.9 2.5 1.7 2.6 6.2 7.2 7.2 1.5 7.8 3.2
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.41 0.56 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2: 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.0 0.6 1.2 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.3 1.7 0.5
HCM2KQueue: 7.7 9.0 9.0 3.5 2.3 3.7 6.9 7.8 7.8 1.8 9.5 3.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.20 1.18 1.19
HCM2k70thQ: 9.2 10.6 10.6 4.1 2.8 4.4 8.2 9.2 9.2 2.1 11.2 4.4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.53 1.52 1.52 1.57 1.58 1.56 1.54 1.53 1.53 1.58 1.52 1.56
HCM2k85thQ: 11.9 13.6 13.6 5.4 3.7 5.8 10.7 11.9 11.9 2.8 14.5 5.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.67 1.66 1.66 1.74 1.76 1.73 1.68 1.67 1.67 1.77 1.65 1.73
HCM2k90thQ: 13.0 14.8 14.8 6.0 4.1 6.5 11.7 13.0 13.0 3.2 15.7 6.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.89 1.86 1.86 2.00 2.03 1.99 1.91 1.89 1.89 2.04 1.85 1.99
HCM2k95thQ: 14.6 16.7 16.7 6.9 4.7 7.4 13.2 14.7 14.7 3.7 17.7 7.4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.25 2.20 2.20 2.47 2.54 2.45 2.29 2.25 2.25 2.57 2.18 2.45
HCM2k98thQ: 17.4 19.7 19.7 8.5 5.9 9.1 15.8 17.5 17.5 4.6 20.8 9.1
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1031 Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 55.9 125 12.4 22.6 17.2 23.7 57.1 59.6 11.1 13.5 78.2 29.6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 80.448 pounds
13.033 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 250.997 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 20.139 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 3.804 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.692 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 80.448 pounds
13.033 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 250.997 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 20.139 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 3.804 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.692 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-181
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
General Plan A AM
Intersection #1031: Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:100***74 92
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
253*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):90
1 139
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
307 0 Critical V/C:0.613 1 358***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):33.5 0
57 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):31.7 1 60
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:247***543 55
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd McClellan Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 247 519 36 85 71 100 253 307 57 55 358 129
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 247 519 36 85 71 100 253 307 57 55 358 129
Added Vol: 0 24 19 7 3 0 0 0 0 5 0 10
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 247 543 55 92 74 100 253 307 57 60 358 139
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 247 543 55 92 74 100 253 307 57 60 358 139
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 247 543 55 92 74 100 253 307 57 60 358 139
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 247 543 55 92 74 100 253 307 57 60 358 139
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.81 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 3359 340 1750 1900 1750 1750 1518 282 1750 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.16 0.16 0.05 0.04 0.06 0.14 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.19 0.08
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 20.2 20.4 20.4 9.8 10.0 10.0 20.7 34.5 34.5 13.3 27.0 27.0
Volume/Cap: 0.63 0.71 0.71 0.48 0.35 0.51 0.63 0.53 0.53 0.23 0.63 0.26
Delay/Veh: 34.7 35.0 35.0 39.6 37.4 39.1 34.3 22.2 22.2 34.3 29.4 24.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 34.7 35.0 35.0 39.6 37.4 39.1 34.3 22.2 22.2 34.3 29.4 24.2
LOS by Move: C-C-C-D D+ D C-C+ C+ C-C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 8 9 9 3 2 4 7 8 8 2 9 3
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-182
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
General Plan B AM
Intersection #1031: Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:100***75 96
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
253*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):90
1 147
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
307 0 Critical V/C:0.637 1 358***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):34.4 0
57 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):32.2 1 62
LOS:C-
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:247***548 63
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd McClellan Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 247 519 36 85 71 100 253 307 57 55 358 129
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 247 519 36 85 71 100 253 307 57 55 358 129
Added Vol: 0 29 27 11 4 0 0 0 0 7 0 18
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 247 548 63 96 75 100 253 307 57 62 358 147
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 247 548 63 96 75 100 253 307 57 62 358 147
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 247 548 63 96 75 100 253 307 57 62 358 147
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 247 548 63 96 75 100 253 307 57 62 358 147
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 0.99 0.91 0.88 0.91 0.84 0.88 0.98 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.78
Lanes: 1.00 1.78 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1663 3328 383 1663 1737 1600 1663 1543 287 1663 1900 1488
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.04 0.19 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 20.7 20.8 20.8 9.8 10.0 10.0 21.2 34.0 34.0 13.3 26.2 26.2
Volume/Cap: 0.65 0.71 0.71 0.53 0.39 0.56 0.65 0.53 0.53 0.25 0.65 0.34
Delay/Veh: 35.2 34.7 34.7 40.8 37.7 40.3 34.8 22.5 22.5 34.5 30.6 25.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 35.2 34.7 34.7 40.8 37.7 40.3 34.8 22.5 22.5 34.5 30.6 25.6
LOS by Move: D+ C-C-D D+ D C-C+ C+ C-C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 8 9 9 3 2 4 7 8 8 2 10 4
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT L RT RT L RT RT L T R
#LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx 0.91 0.91 xxxx 0.98 0.98 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.91 0.91 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.85
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 0.99 0.91 0.88 0.91 0.84 0.88 0.98 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.78
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-183
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1031 Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 20.7 20.8 20.8 9.8 10.0 10.0 21.2 34.0 34.0 13.3 26.2 26.2
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 6.1 7.1 7.1 2.5 1.7 2.6 6.2 7.2 7.2 1.5 7.8 3.1
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.41 0.56 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2: 1.7 2.2 2.2 1.0 0.6 1.2 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.3 1.7 0.5
HCM2KQueue: 7.7 9.3 9.3 3.5 2.4 3.7 6.9 7.8 7.8 1.8 9.5 3.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.20 1.18 1.19
HCM2k70thQ: 9.2 10.9 10.9 4.2 2.8 4.4 8.2 9.2 9.2 2.2 11.2 4.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.53 1.52 1.52 1.57 1.58 1.56 1.54 1.53 1.53 1.58 1.52 1.57
HCM2k85thQ: 11.9 14.1 14.1 5.5 3.7 5.8 10.7 11.9 11.9 2.9 14.5 5.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.67 1.65 1.65 1.74 1.76 1.73 1.68 1.67 1.67 1.77 1.65 1.73
HCM2k90thQ: 13.0 15.3 15.3 6.1 4.1 6.5 11.7 13.0 13.0 3.2 15.7 6.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.89 1.86 1.86 1.99 2.03 1.99 1.91 1.89 1.89 2.04 1.85 1.99
HCM2k95thQ: 14.6 17.2 17.2 7.0 4.8 7.4 13.2 14.7 14.7 3.7 17.7 7.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.25 2.19 2.19 2.46 2.53 2.45 2.29 2.25 2.25 2.57 2.18 2.46
HCM2k98thQ: 17.4 20.3 20.3 8.6 6.0 9.1 15.8 17.5 17.5 4.7 20.8 9.0
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1031 Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 55.9 126 14.5 22.7 17.4 23.7 57.1 59.6 11.1 13.7 78.2 28.9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 81.074 pounds
13.134 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 252.952 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 20.301 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 3.837 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.697 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 81.074 pounds
13.134 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 252.952 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 20.301 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 3.837 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.697 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-184
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
GP Project AM
Intersection #1031: Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:100***77 98
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
253*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):90
1 150
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
307 0 Critical V/C:0.636 1 358***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):34.4 0
57 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):32.4 1 65
LOS:C-
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:247***554 74
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd McClellan Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 247 519 36 85 71 100 253 307 57 55 358 129
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 247 519 36 85 71 100 253 307 57 55 358 129
Added Vol: 0 35 38 13 6 0 0 0 0 10 0 21
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 247 554 74 98 77 100 253 307 57 65 358 150
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 247 554 74 98 77 100 253 307 57 65 358 150
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 247 554 74 98 77 100 253 307 57 65 358 150
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 247 554 74 98 77 100 253 307 57 65 358 150
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 0.98 0.90 0.88 0.92 0.84 0.88 0.98 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.78
Lanes: 1.00 1.75 0.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1663 3259 435 1663 1739 1601 1663 1543 287 1663 1900 1488
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.04 0.19 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 20.7 21.0 21.0 9.6 10.0 10.0 21.2 34.0 34.0 13.3 26.2 26.2
Volume/Cap: 0.65 0.73 0.73 0.55 0.40 0.56 0.65 0.53 0.53 0.26 0.65 0.35
Delay/Veh: 35.2 35.0 35.0 41.8 37.8 40.2 34.8 22.5 22.5 34.6 30.6 25.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 35.2 35.0 35.0 41.8 37.8 40.2 34.8 22.5 22.5 34.6 30.6 25.6
LOS by Move: D+ C-C-D D+ D C-C+ C+ C-C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 8 10 10 4 2 4 7 8 8 2 10 4
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT L RT RT L RT RT L T R
#LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 0.98 0.98 xxxx 0.92 0.92 xxxx 0.98 0.98 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.98 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.85
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 0.98 0.90 0.88 0.92 0.84 0.88 0.98 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.78
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 11:07:04 2014 Page 231-185
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1031 Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 20.7 21.0 21.0 9.6 10.0 10.0 21.2 34.0 34.0 13.3 26.2 26.2
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 6.1 7.3 7.3 2.5 1.8 2.6 6.2 7.2 7.2 1.6 7.8 3.2
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.41 0.56 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2: 1.7 2.3 2.3 1.1 0.6 1.2 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.4 1.7 0.5
HCM2KQueue: 7.7 9.6 9.6 3.6 2.4 3.7 6.9 7.8 7.8 1.9 9.5 3.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.20 1.18 1.19
HCM2k70thQ: 9.2 11.4 11.4 4.3 2.9 4.4 8.2 9.2 9.2 2.3 11.2 4.4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.53 1.52 1.52 1.57 1.58 1.56 1.54 1.53 1.53 1.58 1.52 1.56
HCM2k85thQ: 11.9 14.6 14.6 5.7 3.8 5.8 10.7 11.9 11.9 3.0 14.5 5.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.67 1.65 1.65 1.73 1.75 1.73 1.68 1.67 1.67 1.76 1.65 1.73
HCM2k90thQ: 13.0 15.9 15.9 6.3 4.3 6.5 11.7 13.0 13.0 3.4 15.7 6.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.89 1.85 1.85 1.99 2.02 1.99 1.91 1.89 1.89 2.04 1.85 1.99
HCM2k95thQ: 14.6 17.8 17.8 7.2 4.9 7.4 13.2 14.7 14.7 3.9 17.7 7.4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.25 2.18 2.18 2.46 2.53 2.45 2.29 2.25 2.25 2.56 2.18 2.45
HCM2k98thQ: 17.4 21.0 21.0 8.9 6.1 9.1 15.8 17.5 17.5 4.9 20.8 9.1
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1031 Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 55.9 128 17.1 23.3 17.9 23.7 57.1 59.6 11.1 14.4 78.2 29.6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 82.293 pounds
13.332 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 256.755 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 20.615 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 3.899 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.707 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 82.293 pounds
13.332 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 256.755 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 20.615 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 3.899 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.707 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #1: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:703***27 1080
Lanes:1 0 0 1 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1309*** 3 Critical V/C:0.740 2 810
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):36.8 0
193 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.1 2 285***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 691 27 561 0 1080 165 145 639 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 691 27 561 0 1080 165 145 639 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 179 0 142 0 115 28 14 95 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 210 0 0 0 114 0 126 76 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 1080 27 703 0 1309 193 285 810 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 1080 27 703 0 1309 193 285 810 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 1080 27 703 0 1309 193 285 810 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 1080 27 703 0 1309 193 285 810 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.94 0.06 1.00 0.00 3.45 0.55 2.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 4629 116 1750 0 6551 966 3150 3800 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.40 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.09 0.21 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.0 76.0 76.0 0.0 37.8 37.8 17.1 55.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.74 0.00 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.54 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.2 19.2 27.5 0.0 36.6 36.6 61.2 19.1 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.2 19.2 27.5 0.0 36.6 36.6 61.2 19.1 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A B-B-C A D+ D+ E B-A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 11 11 25 0 14 14 7 9 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-2
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #1: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:674***27 1088
Lanes:1 0 0 1 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1355*** 3 Critical V/C:0.735 2 799
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):36.2 0
208 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):28.8 2 297***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 691 27 561 0 1080 165 145 639 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 691 27 561 0 1080 165 145 639 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 187 0 113 0 161 43 26 84 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 210 0 0 0 114 0 126 76 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 1088 27 674 0 1355 208 297 799 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 1088 27 674 0 1355 208 297 799 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 1088 27 674 0 1355 208 297 799 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 1088 27 674 0 1355 208 297 799 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.87 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.93 0.07 1.00 0.00 3.45 0.55 2.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 4829 120 1750 0 6500 998 3150 3800 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.39 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.09 0.21 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 73.3 73.3 73.3 0.0 39.7 39.7 18.0 57.7 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.74 0.00 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.51 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.6 20.6 28.9 0.0 34.8 34.8 59.9 16.6 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.6 20.6 28.9 0.0 34.8 34.8 59.9 16.6 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A C+ C+ C A C-C-E+ B A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 11 11 25 0 14 14 7 8 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-3
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #1: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:749***27 1338
Lanes:1 0 0 1 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1475*** 3 Critical V/C:0.813 2 858
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):39.4 0
244 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):31.0 2 327***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 691 27 561 0 1080 165 145 639 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 691 27 561 0 1080 165 145 639 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 437 0 188 0 281 79 56 143 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 210 0 0 0 114 0 126 76 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 1338 27 749 0 1475 244 327 858 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 1338 27 749 0 1475 244 327 858 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 1338 27 749 0 1475 244 327 858 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 1338 27 749 0 1475 244 327 858 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.95 0.05 1.00 0.00 3.39 0.61 2.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 4647 94 1750 0 6443 1066 3150 3800 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.43 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.10 0.23 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 73.7 73.7 73.7 0.0 39.4 39.4 17.9 57.3 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.55 0.81 0.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.55 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.3 22.3 33.0 0.0 37.1 37.1 65.6 17.4 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.3 22.3 33.0 0.0 37.1 37.1 65.6 17.4 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A C+ C+ C-A D+ D+ E B A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 15 15 30 0 16 16 8 9 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #1: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:766***27 1353
Lanes:1 0 0 1 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1523*** 3 Critical V/C:0.843 2 885
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):41.2 0
257 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):32.2 2 358***
LOS:C-
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 691 27 561 0 1080 165 145 639 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 691 27 561 0 1080 165 145 639 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 452 0 205 0 329 92 87 170 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 210 0 0 0 114 0 126 76 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 1353 27 766 0 1523 257 358 885 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 1353 27 766 0 1523 257 358 885 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 1353 27 766 0 1523 257 358 885 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 1353 27 766 0 1523 257 358 885 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.95 0.05 1.00 0.00 3.38 0.62 2.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 4648 93 1750 0 6423 1084 3150 3800 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.44 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.11 0.23 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 72.7 72.7 72.7 0.0 39.4 39.4 18.9 58.3 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.56 0.84 0.00 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.56 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1 23.1 35.9 0.0 38.3 38.3 67.1 16.8 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1 23.1 35.9 0.0 38.3 38.3 67.1 16.8 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A C C D+ A D+ D+ E B A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 16 16 32 0 17 17 9 9 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-5
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #2: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 9 11***
Lanes:0 0 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
567*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1572 3 Critical V/C:0.541 3 779***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):36.3 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):20.9 0 0
LOS:C+
Lanes:0 0 1!0 1
Final Vol:200***4 234
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 NB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 157 4 180 11 9 0 484 1278 0 0 589 580
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 157 4 180 11 9 0 484 1278 0 0 589 580
Added Vol: 43 0 23 0 0 0 83 211 0 0 66 134
App+Div: 0 0 31 0 0 78 0 83 0 0 124 121
Initial Fut: 200 4 234 11 9 78 567 1572 0 0 779 835
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 200 4 234 11 9 0 567 1572 0 0 779 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 200 4 234 11 9 0 567 1572 0 0 779 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 200 4 234 11 9 0 567 1572 0 0 779 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.62 0.01 1.37 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1091 22 2388 1750 1900 0 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.18 0.10 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 44.4 44.4 44.4 10.0 10.0 0.0 43.6 76.6 0.0 0.0 33.1 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.58 0.58 0.31 0.09 0.07 0.00 0.58 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.00
Delay/Veh: 41.1 41.1 36.3 60.9 60.7 0.0 29.2 4.0 0.0 0.0 38.2 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.1 41.1 36.3 60.9 60.7 0.0 29.2 4.0 0.0 0.0 38.2 0.0
LOS by Move: D D D+ E E A C A A A D+ A
HCM2kAvgQ: 13 13 6 1 0 0 10 4 0 0 8 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-6
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #2: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 9 11***
Lanes:0 0 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
610*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1584 3 Critical V/C:0.553 3 789***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):36.2 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):20.5 0 0
LOS:C+
Lanes:0 0 1!0 1
Final Vol:191 4***239
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 NB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 157 4 180 11 9 0 484 1278 0 0 589 580
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 157 4 180 11 9 0 484 1278 0 0 589 580
Added Vol: 34 0 28 0 0 0 126 223 0 0 76 198
App+Div: 0 0 31 0 0 78 0 83 0 0 124 121
Initial Fut: 191 4 239 11 9 78 610 1584 0 0 789 899
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 191 4 239 11 9 0 610 1584 0 0 789 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 191 4 239 11 9 0 610 1584 0 0 789 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 191 4 239 11 9 0 610 1584 0 0 789 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.61 0.01 1.38 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1063 22 2415 1800 1800 0 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.18 0.10 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.19 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 42.5 42.5 42.5 10.0 10.0 0.0 45.8 78.5 0.0 0.0 32.7 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.59 0.59 0.33 0.09 0.07 0.00 0.59 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.00
Delay/Veh: 42.7 42.7 37.8 60.9 60.8 0.0 27.5 2.9 0.0 0.0 38.7 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 42.7 42.7 37.8 60.9 60.8 0.0 27.5 2.9 0.0 0.0 38.7 0.0
LOS by Move: D D D+ E E A C A A A D+ A
HCM2kAvgQ: 13 13 6 1 0 0 10 3 0 0 8 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-7
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #2: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 9 11***
Lanes:0 0 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
708*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1854 3 Critical V/C:0.621 3 850***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):37.7 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):20.9 0 0
LOS:C+
Lanes:0 0 1!0 1
Final Vol:220***4 257
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 NB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 157 4 180 11 9 0 484 1278 0 0 589 580
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 157 4 180 11 9 0 484 1278 0 0 589 580
Added Vol: 63 0 46 0 0 0 224 493 0 0 137 547
App+Div: 0 0 31 0 0 78 0 83 0 0 124 121
Initial Fut: 220 4 257 11 9 78 708 1854 0 0 850 1248
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 220 4 257 11 9 0 708 1854 0 0 850 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 220 4 257 11 9 0 708 1854 0 0 850 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 220 4 257 11 9 0 708 1854 0 0 850 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.62 0.01 1.37 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1093 20 2389 1750 1900 0 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.20 0.20 0.11 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 42.3 42.3 42.3 10.0 10.0 0.0 47.3 78.7 0.0 0.0 31.4 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.67 0.67 0.36 0.09 0.07 0.00 0.67 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00
Delay/Veh: 45.0 45.0 38.3 60.9 60.7 0.0 27.7 3.2 0.0 0.0 41.3 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 45.0 45.0 38.3 60.9 60.7 0.0 27.7 3.2 0.0 0.0 41.3 0.0
LOS by Move: D D D+ E E A C A A A D A
HCM2kAvgQ: 15 15 7 1 0 0 12 4 0 0 9 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-8
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #2: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 9 11***
Lanes:0 0 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
743*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1882 3 Critical V/C:0.651 3 901***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):38.5 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):21.5 0 0
LOS:C+
Lanes:0 0 1!0 1
Final Vol:226***4 273
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 NB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 157 4 180 11 9 0 484 1278 0 0 589 580
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 157 4 180 11 9 0 484 1278 0 0 589 580
Added Vol: 69 0 62 0 0 0 259 521 0 0 188 570
App+Div: 0 0 31 0 0 78 0 83 0 0 124 121
Initial Fut: 226 4 273 11 9 78 743 1882 0 0 901 1271
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 226 4 273 11 9 0 743 1882 0 0 901 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 226 4 273 11 9 0 743 1882 0 0 901 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 226 4 273 11 9 0 743 1882 0 0 901 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.62 0.01 1.37 1.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1080 19 2402 1750 1900 0 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.21 0.21 0.11 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 42.0 42.0 42.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 47.3 79.0 0.0 0.0 31.7 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.70 0.70 0.38 0.09 0.07 0.00 0.70 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.00
Delay/Veh: 46.4 46.4 38.9 60.9 60.7 0.0 28.6 3.0 0.0 0.0 41.7 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 46.4 46.4 38.9 60.9 60.7 0.0 28.6 3.0 0.0 0.0 41.7 0.0
LOS by Move: D D D+ E E A C A A A D A
HCM2kAvgQ: 16 16 7 1 0 0 13 4 0 0 10 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-9
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #3: Stevens Creek Blvd and Stelling Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:158 504 488***
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
330*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 407
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1087 3 Critical V/C:0.942 2 1041***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):62.6 0
468 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):52.9 2 448
LOS:D-
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:217 317 234***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Road Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 146 270 146 251 425 129 249 870 334 292 807 157
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 146 270 146 251 425 129 249 870 334 292 807 157
Added Vol: 12 11 2 216 18 16 66 148 21 7 170 229
App+Div: 59 36 86 21 61 13 15 69 113 149 64 21
Initial Fut: 217 317 234 488 504 158 330 1087 468 448 1041 407
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 217 317 234 488 504 158 330 1087 468 448 1041 407
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 217 317 234 488 504 158 330 1087 468 448 1041 407
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 217 317 234 488 504 158 330 1087 468 448 1041 407
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.49 0.51 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.11 0.89
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 1750 2835 889 1750 5700 1750 3150 4001 1564
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.08 0.13 0.28 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.19 0.27 0.14 0.26 0.26
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 25.2 19.9 19.9 41.4 36.1 36.1 28.0 43.5 43.5 23.2 38.7 38.7
Volume/Cap: 0.69 0.59 0.94 0.94 0.69 0.69 0.94 0.61 0.86 0.86 0.94 0.94
Delay/Veh: 60.1 57.9 100.8 73.9 49.0 49.0 79.3 29.4 44.8 62.9 48.8 48.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 60.1 57.9 100.8 73.9 49.0 49.0 79.3 29.4 44.8 62.9 48.8 48.8
LOS by Move: E E+ F E D D E-C D E D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 7 15 26 14 14 17 11 20 12 23 23
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-10
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #3: Stevens Creek Blvd and Stelling Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:171 504 474***
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
333*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 394
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1112 3 Critical V/C:0.945 2 1111***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):62.2 0
455 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):52.1 2 448
LOS:D-
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:210 317 234***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Road Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 146 270 146 251 425 129 249 870 334 292 807 157
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 146 270 146 251 425 129 249 870 334 292 807 157
Added Vol: 5 11 2 202 18 29 69 173 8 7 240 216
App+Div: 59 36 86 21 61 13 15 69 113 149 64 21
Initial Fut: 210 317 234 474 504 171 333 1112 455 448 1111 394
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 210 317 234 474 504 171 333 1112 455 448 1111 394
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 210 317 234 474 504 171 333 1112 455 448 1111 394
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 210 317 234 474 504 171 333 1112 455 448 1111 394
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.48 0.52 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.19 0.81
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 1750 2762 937 1750 5700 1750 3150 4132 1465
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.08 0.13 0.27 0.18 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.26 0.14 0.27 0.27
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.8 19.8 19.8 40.1 36.2 36.2 28.2 44.0 44.0 24.1 39.8 39.8
Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.59 0.94 0.94 0.71 0.71 0.94 0.62 0.83 0.83 0.94 0.94
Delay/Veh: 62.4 58.0 101.6 75.7 49.5 49.5 79.6 29.1 41.0 58.4 47.9 47.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 62.4 58.0 101.6 75.7 49.5 49.5 79.6 29.1 41.0 58.4 47.9 47.9
LOS by Move: E E+ F E-D D E-C D E+ D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 10 7 15 26 14 14 17 11 18 11 23 23
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-11
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #3: Stevens Creek Blvd and Stelling Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:176 508 613***
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
372*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 530
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1354 3 Critical V/C:1.161 2 1511***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):126.5 0
463 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):84.1 2 449
LOS:F
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:214 320 232***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Road Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 146 270 146 251 425 129 249 870 334 292 807 157
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 146 270 146 251 425 129 249 870 334 292 807 157
Added Vol: 9 14 0 341 22 34 108 415 16 8 640 352
App+Div: 59 36 86 21 61 13 15 69 113 149 64 21
Initial Fut: 214 320 232 613 508 176 372 1354 463 449 1511 530
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 214 320 232 613 508 176 372 1354 463 449 1511 530
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 214 320 232 613 508 176 372 1354 463 449 1511 530
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 214 320 232 613 508 176 372 1354 463 449 1511 530
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.45 0.55 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.17 0.83
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 1750 2761 957 1750 5700 1750 3150 4128 1448
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.08 0.13 0.35 0.18 0.18 0.21 0.24 0.26 0.14 0.37 0.37
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.2 16.0 16.0 42.2 35.0 35.0 25.6 45.3 45.3 24.4 44.1 44.1
Volume/Cap: 0.74 0.74 1.16 1.16 0.74 0.74 1.16 0.73 0.82 0.82 1.16 1.16
Delay/Veh: 64.9 66.5 175.8 140.7 51.4 51.4 150.0 30.1 38.6 57.1 112 112.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 64.9 66.5 175.8 140.7 51.4 51.4 150.0 30.1 38.6 57.1 112 112.4
LOS by Move: E E F F D-D-F C D+ E+ F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 8 18 42 15 15 25 15 18 11 42 42
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-12
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #3: Stevens Creek Blvd and Stelling Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:177 508 617***
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
373*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 543
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1394 3 Critical V/C:1.182 2 1583***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):134.3 0
466 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):88.2 2 455
LOS:F
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:216 321 234***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Road Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 146 270 146 251 425 129 249 870 334 292 807 157
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 146 270 146 251 425 129 249 870 334 292 807 157
Added Vol: 11 15 2 345 22 35 109 455 19 14 712 365
App+Div: 59 36 86 21 61 13 15 69 113 149 64 21
Initial Fut: 216 321 234 617 508 177 373 1394 466 455 1583 543
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 216 321 234 617 508 177 373 1394 466 455 1583 543
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 216 321 234 617 508 177 373 1394 466 455 1583 543
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 216 321 234 617 508 177 373 1394 466 455 1583 543
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.45 0.55 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.19 0.81
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 1750 2757 961 1750 5700 1750 3150 4153 1425
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.08 0.13 0.35 0.18 0.18 0.21 0.24 0.27 0.14 0.38 0.38
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.1 15.8 15.8 41.8 34.5 34.5 25.2 45.6 45.6 24.8 45.1 45.1
Volume/Cap: 0.75 0.75 1.18 1.18 0.75 0.75 1.18 0.75 0.82 0.82 1.18 1.18
Delay/Veh: 66.0 67.2 183.7 149.3 52.2 52.2 158.5 30.3 38.3 56.7 120 120.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 66.0 67.2 183.7 149.3 52.2 52.2 158.5 30.3 38.3 56.7 120 120.3
LOS by Move: E E F F D-D-F C D+ E+ F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 8 18 44 15 15 25 15 18 11 44 44
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-13
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #4: Fremont Ave/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:403 2261***315
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
420 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 163
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1105*** 2 Critical V/C:0.953 2 491
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):56.2 0
269 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):52.5 2 251***
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:231***1196 182
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road Fremonve Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 187 819 148 289 1792 373 389 1014 215 194 438 147
Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 202 885 160 312 1935 403 420 1095 232 210 473 159
Added Vol: 19 272 12 3 210 0 0 6 8 8 14 4
App+Div: 10 39 10 0 116 0 0 4 29 33 4 0
Initial Fut: 231 1196 182 315 2261 403 420 1105 269 251 491 163
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 231 1196 182 315 2261 403 420 1105 269 251 491 163
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 231 1196 182 315 2261 403 420 1105 269 251 491 163
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 231 1196 182 315 2261 403 420 1105 269 251 491 163
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.57 0.43 2.00 2.51 0.49 2.00 2.37 0.63 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 4892 744 3150 4776 851 3150 4508 1098 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.24 0.24 0.10 0.47 0.47 0.13 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.13 0.09
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.8 57.0 57.0 23.3 69.5 69.5 24.2 36.0 36.0 11.7 23.5 23.5
Volume/Cap: 0.95 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.95 0.95 0.77 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.77 0.55
Delay/Veh: 109.1 33.0 33.0 56.0 42.3 42.3 61.9 65.3 65.3 106.5 61.5 55.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 109.1 33.0 33.0 56.0 42.3 42.3 61.9 65.3 65.3 106.5 61.5 55.8
LOS by Move: F C-C-E+ D D E E E F E E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 16 16 8 42 42 12 24 24 10 12 7
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-14
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #4: Fremont Ave/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:403 2299***315
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
420 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 164
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1107*** 2 Critical V/C:0.967 2 494
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):58.8 0
270 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):54.0 2 258***
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:233***1260 190
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road Fremonve Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 187 819 148 289 1792 373 389 1014 215 194 438 147
Growth Adj:1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 202 885 160 312 1935 403 420 1095 232 210 473 159
Added Vol: 21 336 20 3 248 0 0 8 9 15 17 5
App+Div: 10 39 10 0 116 0 0 4 29 33 4 0
Initial Fut: 233 1260 190 315 2299 403 420 1107 270 258 494 164
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 233 1260 190 315 2299 403 420 1107 270 258 494 164
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 233 1260 190 315 2299 403 420 1107 270 258 494 164
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 233 1260 190 315 2299 403 420 1107 270 258 494 164
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.59 0.41 2.00 2.54 0.46 2.00 2.39 0.61 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 4866 733 3150 4764 835 3150 4500 1098 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.26 0.26 0.10 0.48 0.48 0.13 0.25 0.25 0.08 0.13 0.09
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.7 58.1 58.1 22.5 69.9 69.9 24.0 35.6 35.6 11.8 23.4 23.4
Volume/Cap: 0.97 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.97 0.97 0.78 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.78 0.56
Delay/Veh: 113.1 32.9 32.9 57.3 44.5 44.5 62.5 68.3 68.3 109.9 61.8 56.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 113.1 32.9 32.9 57.3 44.5 44.5 62.5 68.3 68.3 109.9 61.8 56.0
LOS by Move: F C-C-E+ D D E E E F E E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 17 17 8 43 43 12 25 25 10 12 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-15
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #4: Fremont Ave/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:404 2493***314
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
421 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 174
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1105*** 2 Critical V/C:1.012 2 499
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):69.2 0
279 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):60.1 2 270***
LOS:E
Lanes:2 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:246***1503 211
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road Fremonve Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 187 819 148 289 1792 373 389 1014 215 194 438 147
Growth Adj:1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 202 885 160 312 1935 403 420 1095 232 210 473 159
Added Vol: 34 579 41 2 442 1 1 6 18 27 22 15
App+Div: 10 39 10 0 116 0 0 4 29 33 4 0
Initial Fut: 246 1503 211 314 2493 404 421 1105 279 270 499 174
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 246 1503 211 314 2493 404 421 1105 279 270 499 174
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 246 1503 211 314 2493 404 421 1105 279 270 499 174
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 246 1503 211 314 2493 404 421 1105 279 270 499 174
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.60 0.40 2.00 2.55 0.45 2.00 2.35 0.65 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 4946 694 3150 4848 785 3150 4473 1130 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.30 0.30 0.10 0.51 0.51 0.13 0.25 0.25 0.09 0.13 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.8 61.7 61.7 20.3 71.2 71.2 23.2 34.2 34.2 11.8 22.8 22.8
Volume/Cap: 1.01 0.69 0.69 0.69 1.01 1.01 0.81 1.01 1.01 1.01 0.81 0.61
Delay/Veh: 125.4 32.3 32.3 61.3 54.2 54.2 65.2 80.2 80.2 122.3 64.1 58.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 125.4 32.3 32.3 61.3 54.2 54.2 65.2 80.2 80.2 122.3 64.1 58.3
LOS by Move: F C-C-E D-D-E F F F E E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 10 20 20 9 50 50 13 26 26 11 12 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-16
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #4: Fremont Ave/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:406 2553***319
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
422 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 191
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1110*** 2 Critical V/C:1.028 2 511
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):73.8 0
282 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):63.0 2 274***
LOS:E
Lanes:2 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:251***1587 219
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road Fremonve Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 187 819 148 289 1792 373 389 1014 215 194 438 147
Growth Adj:1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 202 885 160 312 1935 403 420 1095 232 210 473 159
Added Vol: 39 663 49 7 502 3 2 11 21 31 34 32
App+Div: 10 39 10 0 116 0 0 4 29 33 4 0
Initial Fut: 251 1587 219 319 2553 406 422 1110 282 274 511 191
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 251 1587 219 319 2553 406 422 1110 282 274 511 191
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 251 1587 219 319 2553 406 422 1110 282 274 511 191
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 251 1587 219 319 2553 406 422 1110 282 274 511 191
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.61 0.39 2.00 2.56 0.44 2.00 2.35 0.65 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 4958 684 3150 4861 773 3150 4467 1136 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.32 0.32 0.10 0.53 0.53 0.13 0.25 0.25 0.09 0.13 0.11
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.8 62.5 62.5 19.8 71.5 71.5 22.8 33.8 33.8 11.8 22.9 22.9
Volume/Cap: 1.03 0.72 0.72 0.72 1.03 1.03 0.82 1.03 1.03 1.03 0.82 0.67
Delay/Veh: 129.7 32.5 32.5 62.9 58.8 58.8 67.1 85.1 85.1 126.8 65.4 60.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 129.7 32.5 32.5 62.9 58.8 58.8 67.1 85.1 85.1 126.8 65.4 60.9
LOS by Move: F C-C-E E+ E+ E F F F E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 22 22 9 52 52 13 27 27 11 13 9
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-17
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #5: Homestead Road and De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:254 2020***553
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
202 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 286
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
735 2 Critical V/C:1.053 1 565
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):85.1 0
444*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):66.1 2 511***
LOS:E
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:607***1499 636
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
Added Vol: 64 191 28 62 142 22 12 27 64 185 67 100
App+Div: 82 77 30 10 169 52 45 43 63 24 45 5
Initial Fut: 607 1499 636 553 2020 254 202 735 444 511 565 286
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 607 1499 636 553 2020 254 202 735 444 511 565 286
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 607 1499 636 553 2020 254 202 735 444 511 565 286
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 607 1499 636 553 2020 254 202 735 444 511 565 286
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.29 0.71
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2452 1241
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.26 0.36 0.18 0.35 0.15 0.06 0.19 0.25 0.16 0.23 0.23
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 25.6 49.0 49.0 23.7 47.1 47.1 12.0 33.7 33.7 21.6 43.2 43.2
Volume/Cap: 1.05 0.75 1.04 1.04 1.05 0.43 0.75 0.80 1.05 1.05 0.75 0.75
Delay/Veh: 101.0 27.3 75.6 99.4 67.0 24.4 73.3 55.2 111.7 114.8 46.2 46.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 101.0 27.3 75.6 99.4 67.0 24.4 73.3 55.2 111.7 114.8 46.2 46.2
LOS by Move: F C E-F E C E E+ F F D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 20 16 35 20 38 7 7 16 28 19 16 16
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-18
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #5: Homestead Road and De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:277 2061***534
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
227 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 272
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
740 2 Critical V/C:1.152 1 573
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):123.6 0
559*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):83.3 2 462***
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:711***1561 639
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
Added Vol: 168 253 31 43 183 45 37 32 179 136 75 86
App+Div: 82 77 30 10 169 52 45 43 63 24 45 5
Initial Fut: 711 1561 639 534 2061 277 227 740 559 462 573 272
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 711 1561 639 534 2061 277 227 740 559 462 573 272
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 711 1561 639 534 2061 277 227 740 559 462 573 272
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 711 1561 639 534 2061 277 227 740 559 462 573 272
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.34 0.66
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2508 1191
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.27 0.37 0.17 0.36 0.16 0.07 0.19 0.32 0.15 0.23 0.23
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 27.4 48.7 48.7 22.6 43.9 43.9 13.6 38.8 38.8 17.8 43.1 43.1
Volume/Cap: 1.15 0.79 1.05 1.05 1.15 0.50 0.74 0.70 1.15 1.15 0.74 0.74
Delay/Veh: 133.2 28.5 79.3 104.5 109 28.0 71.0 47.6 140.5 154.5 46.2 46.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 133.2 28.5 79.3 104.5 109 28.0 71.0 47.6 140.5 154.5 46.2 46.2
LOS by Move: F C E-F F C E D F F D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 26 17 36 20 43 9 7 14 39 19 16 16
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-19
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #5: Homestead Road and De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:296 2205 587***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
244 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 317
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
817 2 Critical V/C:1.480 1 666
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):273.8 0
644*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):159.8 2 905***
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:789 1777 895***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
Added Vol: 246 469 287 96 327 64 54 109 264 579 168 131
App+Div: 82 77 30 10 169 52 45 43 63 24 45 5
Initial Fut: 789 1777 895 587 2205 296 244 817 644 905 666 317
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 789 1777 895 587 2205 296 244 817 644 905 666 317
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 789 1777 895 587 2205 296 244 817 644 905 666 317
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 789 1777 895 587 2205 296 244 817 644 905 666 317
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.32 0.68
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2505 1192
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.25 0.31 0.51 0.19 0.39 0.17 0.08 0.22 0.37 0.29 0.27 0.27
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 25.9 48.4 48.4 17.6 40.1 40.1 14.0 34.8 34.8 27.2 48.0 48.0
Volume/Cap: 1.35 0.90 1.48 1.48 1.35 0.59 0.78 0.86 1.48 1.48 0.78 0.78
Delay/Veh: 217.7 34.4 254.5 284.5 199 33.3 72.9 58.7 280.6 281.1 44.2 44.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 217.7 34.4 254.5 284.5 199 33.3 72.9 58.7 280.6 281.1 44.2 44.2
LOS by Move: F C-F F F C-E E+ F F D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 35 23 78 31 56 10 8 19 58 46 18 18
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-20
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #5: Homestead Road and De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:312 2233 611***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
256 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 338
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
826 2 Critical V/C:1.539 1 687
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):299.9 0
693*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):181.4 2 951***
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:857 1840 901***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
Added Vol: 314 532 293 120 355 80 66 118 313 625 189 152
App+Div: 82 77 30 10 169 52 45 43 63 24 45 5
Initial Fut: 857 1840 901 611 2233 312 256 826 693 951 687 338
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 857 1840 901 611 2233 312 256 826 693 951 687 338
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 857 1840 901 611 2233 312 256 826 693 951 687 338
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 857 1840 901 611 2233 312 256 826 693 951 687 338
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.30 0.70
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2477 1219
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.27 0.32 0.51 0.19 0.39 0.18 0.08 0.22 0.40 0.30 0.28 0.28
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 26.4 46.8 46.8 17.6 38.1 38.1 14.4 36.0 36.0 27.5 49.1 49.1
Volume/Cap: 1.44 0.96 1.54 1.54 1.44 0.66 0.79 0.84 1.54 1.54 0.79 0.79
Delay/Veh: 255.8 43.7 281.8 310.0 240 37.2 73.7 56.2 305.3 306.7 44.2 44.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 255.8 43.7 281.8 310.0 240 37.2 73.7 56.2 305.3 306.7 44.2 44.2
LOS by Move: F D F F F D+ E E+ F F D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 41 27 82 33 60 12 8 18 65 50 19 19
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-21
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #6: De Anza Blvd and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:592***2258 0
Lanes:0 1 4 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 749
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.247 1!1***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):156.1 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):71.7 1 830
LOS:E
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:1186***2014 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Added Vol: 397 240 0 0 164 226 0 0 0 147 0 43
App+Div: 20 166 0 0 182 9 0 0 0 24 0 42
Initial Fut: 1186 2014 0 0 2258 592 0 0 0 830 1 749
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1186 2014 0 0 2258 592 0 0 0 830 1 749
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1186 2014 0 0 2258 592 0 0 0 830 1 749
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 1186 2014 0 0 2258 592 0 0 0 830 1 749
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.52 0.01 1.47
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 7600 1750 0 0 0 2669 2 2579
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.38 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.45 0.29
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 42.3 80.3 0.0 0.0 38.0 38.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.7 50.7 50.7
Volume/Cap: 1.25 0.62 0.00 0.00 1.09 1.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.86 1.25 0.80
Delay/Veh: 154.6 2.4 0.0 0.0 87.9 153.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.6 162 42.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 154.6 2.4 0.0 0.0 87.9 153.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.6 162 42.6
LOS by Move: F A A A F F A A A D F D
HCM2kAvgQ: 47 4 0 0 29 41 0 0 0 26 59 23
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-22
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #6: De Anza Blvd and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:603***2355 0
Lanes:0 1 4 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 789
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.316 1!1***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):186.6 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):90.5 1 877
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:1292***2144 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Added Vol: 503 370 0 0 261 237 0 0 0 194 0 83
App+Div: 20 166 0 0 182 9 0 0 0 24 0 42
Initial Fut: 1292 2144 0 0 2355 603 0 0 0 877 1 789
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1292 2144 0 0 2355 603 0 0 0 877 1 789
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1292 2144 0 0 2355 603 0 0 0 877 1 789
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 1292 2144 0 0 2355 603 0 0 0 877 1 789
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.52 0.01 1.47
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 7600 1750 0 0 0 2670 2 2578
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.41 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.48 0.31
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 43.6 80.3 0.0 0.0 36.7 36.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.7 50.7 50.7
Volume/Cap: 1.32 0.66 0.00 0.00 1.18 1.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.91 1.32 0.85
Delay/Veh: 183.1 2.6 0.0 0.0 126 184.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.4 192 44.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 183.1 2.6 0.0 0.0 126 184.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.4 192 44.6
LOS by Move: F A A A F F A A A D F D
HCM2kAvgQ: 55 4 0 0 35 45 0 0 0 29 66 25
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-23
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #6: De Anza Blvd and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:1080***2550 0
Lanes:0 1 4 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 835
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.753 1!1***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):378.0 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):136.9 1 1056
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:1519***2647 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Added Vol: 730 873 0 0 456 714 0 0 0 373 0 129
App+Div: 20 166 0 0 182 9 0 0 0 24 0 42
Initial Fut: 1519 2647 0 0 2550 1080 0 0 0 1056 1 835
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1519 2647 0 0 2550 1080 0 0 0 1056 1 835
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1519 2647 0 0 2550 1080 0 0 0 1056 1 835
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 1519 2647 0 0 2550 1080 0 0 0 1056 1 835
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.55 0.01 1.44
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 7600 1750 0 0 0 2726 2 2522
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.48 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.54 0.33
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 38.5 87.8 0.0 0.0 49.3 49.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.2 43.2 43.2
Volume/Cap: 1.75 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.95 1.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.26 1.75 1.07
Delay/Veh: 381.5 0.9 0.0 0.0 34.9 369.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 168.9 391 92.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 381.5 0.9 0.0 0.0 34.9 369.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 168.9 391 92.5
LOS by Move: F A A A C-F A A A F F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 85 1 0 0 24 109 0 0 0 51 97 36
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-24
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #6: De Anza Blvd and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:1150***2602 0
Lanes:0 1 4 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 861
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.870 1!1***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):430.2 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):162.2 1 1081
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:1691***2758 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Added Vol: 902 984 0 0 508 784 0 0 0 398 0 155
App+Div: 20 166 0 0 182 9 0 0 0 24 0 42
Initial Fut: 1691 2758 0 0 2602 1150 0 0 0 1081 1 861
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1691 2758 0 0 2602 1150 0 0 0 1081 1 861
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1691 2758 0 0 2602 1150 0 0 0 1081 1 861
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 1691 2758 0 0 2602 1150 0 0 0 1081 1 861
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.55 0.01 1.44
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 7600 1750 0 0 0 2723 2 2525
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.54 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.56 0.34
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 40.2 89.4 0.0 0.0 49.2 49.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.6 41.6 41.6
Volume/Cap: 1.87 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.97 1.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.34 1.87 1.15
Delay/Veh: 432.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 37.9 422.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 205.3 444 123.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 432.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 37.9 422.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 205.3 444 123.1
LOS by Move: F A A A D+ F A A A F F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 99 1 0 0 26 121 0 0 0 57 104 41
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-25
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #7: De Anza Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 2485 575***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
522 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
3*** 1! Critical V/C:1.141 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):116.9 0
915 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):35.3 0 0
LOS:D+
Lanes:0 0 5 0 1
Final Vol:0 2711 828***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1956 591 555 1989 0 453 3 435 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1956 591 555 1989 0 453 3 435 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 593 213 11 299 0 44 0 443 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 162 24 9 197 0 25 0 37 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 2711 828 575 2485 0 522 3 915 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2711 828 575 2485 0 522 3 915 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2711 828 575 2485 0 522 3 915 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2711 828 575 2485 0 522 3 915 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.36 0.01 1.63 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2383 7 2860 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.29 0.47 0.18 0.44 0.00 0.22 0.41 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 58.0 58.0 22.4 80.4 0.0 50.6 50.6 50.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.69 1.14 1.14 0.76 0.00 0.61 1.14 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 18.2 101.2 136.4 3.3 0.0 37.0 118 48.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 18.2 101.2 136.4 3.3 0.0 37.0 118 48.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A B-F F A A D+ F D A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 14 55 19 5 0 13 48 26 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-26
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #7: De Anza Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 2588 618***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
578 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
3*** 1! Critical V/C:1.235 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):155.1 0
939 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):42.9 0 0
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 5 0 1
Final Vol:0 2891 917***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1956 591 555 1989 0 453 3 435 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1956 591 555 1989 0 453 3 435 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 773 302 54 402 0 100 0 467 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 162 24 9 197 0 25 0 37 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 2891 917 618 2588 0 578 3 939 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2891 917 618 2588 0 578 3 939 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2891 917 618 2588 0 578 3 939 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2891 917 618 2588 0 578 3 939 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.38 0.01 1.61 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2414 7 2829 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.30 0.52 0.20 0.45 0.00 0.24 0.44 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 59.4 59.4 22.2 81.7 0.0 49.3 49.3 49.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.72 1.23 1.23 0.78 0.00 0.68 1.23 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 17.6 137.6 173.5 2.7 0.0 39.5 158 55.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 17.6 137.6 173.5 2.7 0.0 39.5 158 55.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A B F F A A D F E+ A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 16 67 24 4 0 16 56 30 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-27
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #7: De Anza Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 2922 657***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
850 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
3*** 1! Critical V/C:1.593 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):310.7 0
1258 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):85.1 0 0
LOS:F
Lanes:0 0 5 0 1
Final Vol:0 3349 1186***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1956 591 555 1989 0 453 3 435 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1956 591 555 1989 0 453 3 435 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 1231 571 93 736 0 372 0 786 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 162 24 9 197 0 25 0 37 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 3349 1186 657 2922 0 850 3 1258 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 3349 1186 657 2922 0 850 3 1258 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 3349 1186 657 2922 0 850 3 1258 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 3349 1186 657 2922 0 850 3 1258 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.40 0.01 1.59 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2454 5 2792 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.35 0.68 0.21 0.51 0.00 0.35 0.60 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 59.6 59.6 18.3 77.9 0.0 53.1 53.1 53.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.83 1.59 1.59 0.92 0.00 0.91 1.59 1.19 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 19.6 293.3 332.6 9.7 0.0 47.4 314 134.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 19.6 293.3 332.6 9.7 0.0 47.4 314 134.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A B-F F A A D F F A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 22 113 34 21 0 29 101 55 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-28
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #7: De Anza Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 2981 676***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
890 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
3*** 1! Critical V/C:1.691 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):354.2 0
1374 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):99.9 0 0
LOS:F
Lanes:0 0 5 0 1
Final Vol:0 3592 1258***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1956 591 555 1989 0 453 3 435 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1956 591 555 1989 0 453 3 435 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 1474 643 112 795 0 412 0 902 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 162 24 9 197 0 25 0 37 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 3592 1258 676 2981 0 890 3 1374 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 3592 1258 676 2981 0 890 3 1374 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 3592 1258 676 2981 0 890 3 1374 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 3592 1258 676 2981 0 890 3 1374 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.39 0.01 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2436 5 2809 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.38 0.72 0.21 0.52 0.00 0.37 0.65 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 59.5 59.5 17.8 77.3 0.0 53.7 53.7 53.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.89 1.69 1.69 0.95 0.00 0.95 1.69 1.28 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 21.6 337.0 376.6 12.4 0.0 51.6 357 171.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 21.6 337.0 376.6 12.4 0.0 51.6 357 171.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A C+ F F B A D-F F A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 27 125 37 26 0 33 113 65 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-29
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #8: Stevens Creek Blvd and De Anza Blvd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:667***1984 813
Lanes:1 0 4 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
550 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 385
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
905 3 Critical V/C:1.147 2 832
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):134.5 0
519*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):76.2 2 572***
LOS:E-
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:597***1073 485
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Added Vol: 28 104 51 272 141 254 233 115 40 107 139 115
App+Div: 61 31 134 54 31 154 114 93 62 113 127 28
Initial Fut: 597 1073 485 813 1984 667 550 905 519 572 832 385
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 597 1073 485 813 1984 667 550 905 519 572 832 385
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 597 1073 485 813 1984 667 550 905 519 572 832 385
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 597 1073 485 813 1984 667 550 905 519 572 832 385
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 7600 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.19 0.28 0.26 0.26 0.38 0.17 0.16 0.30 0.18 0.22 0.22
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.1 36.1 36.1 33.6 46.5 46.5 25.8 36.2 36.2 22.2 32.5 32.5
Volume/Cap: 1.15 0.73 1.08 1.08 0.79 1.15 0.95 0.61 1.15 1.15 0.94 0.95
Delay/Veh: 137.5 38.4 104.2 97.1 29.9 116.3 81.2 46.5 141.1 146.4 66.4 67.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 137.5 38.4 104.2 97.1 29.9 116.3 81.2 46.5 141.1 146.4 66.4 67.1
LOS by Move: F D+ F F C F F D F F E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 24 14 31 29 18 45 16 11 34 23 22 22
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-30
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #8: Stevens Creek Blvd and De Anza Blvd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:641***2028 773
Lanes:1 0 4 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
533 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 397
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
914 3 Critical V/C:1.172 2 834
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):144.0 0
538*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):78.7 2 574***
LOS:E-
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:678***1150 500
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Added Vol: 109 181 66 232 185 228 216 124 59 109 141 127
App+Div: 61 31 134 54 31 154 114 93 62 113 127 28
Initial Fut: 678 1150 500 773 2028 641 533 914 538 574 834 397
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 678 1150 500 773 2028 641 533 914 538 574 834 397
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 678 1150 500 773 2028 641 533 914 538 574 834 397
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 678 1150 500 773 2028 641 533 914 538 574 834 397
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 7600 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3797 1800
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.20 0.29 0.25 0.27 0.37 0.17 0.16 0.31 0.18 0.22 0.22
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 25.7 37.4 37.4 32.1 43.8 43.8 25.4 36.7 36.7 21.8 33.1 33.1
Volume/Cap: 1.17 0.76 1.07 1.07 0.85 1.17 0.93 0.61 1.17 1.17 0.93 0.93
Delay/Veh: 143.1 37.9 100.5 97.1 34.7 128.9 78.8 46.1 149.9 156.3 63.8 64.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 143.1 37.9 100.5 97.1 34.7 128.9 78.8 46.1 149.9 156.3 63.8 64.4
LOS by Move: F D+ F F C-F E-D F F E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 28 15 32 28 21 45 15 11 36 24 21 21
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-31
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #8: Stevens Creek Blvd and De Anza Blvd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:812***2306 839
Lanes:1 0 4 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
712 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 315
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
943 3 Critical V/C:1.549 2 896
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):303.8 0
732*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):144.2 2 685***
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:996***1481 569
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Added Vol: 427 512 135 298 463 399 395 153 253 220 203 45
App+Div: 61 31 134 54 31 154 114 93 62 113 127 28
Initial Fut: 996 1481 569 839 2306 812 712 943 732 685 896 315
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 996 1481 569 839 2306 812 712 943 732 685 896 315
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 996 1481 569 839 2306 812 712 943 732 685 896 315
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 996 1481 569 839 2306 812 712 943 732 685 896 315
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.17 0.83
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 7600 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 4125 1450
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.32 0.26 0.33 0.27 0.30 0.46 0.23 0.17 0.42 0.22 0.22 0.22
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 28.6 38.8 38.8 31.8 41.9 41.9 29.3 37.8 37.8 19.7 28.2 28.2
Volume/Cap: 1.55 0.94 1.17 1.17 1.01 1.55 1.08 0.61 1.55 1.55 1.08 1.08
Delay/Veh: 300.7 48.0 136.0 136.2 57.1 291.3 113.9 45.4 308.3 318.1 107 107.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 300.7 48.0 136.0 136.2 57.1 291.3 113.9 45.4 308.3 318.1 107 107.0
LOS by Move: F D F F E+ F F D F F F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 53 24 40 34 31 76 21 10 66 37 25 25
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-32
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #8: Stevens Creek Blvd and De Anza Blvd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:824***2342 917
Lanes:1 0 4 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
714 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 324
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
983 3 Critical V/C:1.592 2 967
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):323.4 0
736*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):160.4 2 773***
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:1005***1551 595
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Added Vol: 436 582 161 376 499 411 397 193 257 308 274 54
App+Div: 61 31 134 54 31 154 114 93 62 113 127 28
Initial Fut: 1005 1551 595 917 2342 824 714 983 736 773 967 324
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1005 1551 595 917 2342 824 714 983 736 773 967 324
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1005 1551 595 917 2342 824 714 983 736 773 967 324
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 1005 1551 595 917 2342 824 714 983 736 773 967 324
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.20 0.80
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 7600 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 4180 1400
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.32 0.27 0.34 0.29 0.31 0.47 0.23 0.17 0.42 0.25 0.23 0.23
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 28.1 37.4 37.4 32.0 41.4 41.4 29.0 37.0 37.0 21.6 29.6 29.6
Volume/Cap: 1.59 1.02 1.27 1.27 1.04 1.59 1.10 0.65 1.59 1.59 1.10 1.10
Delay/Veh: 320.6 66.5 177.3 176.5 66.6 311.1 119.6 46.8 328.2 335.4 111 111.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 320.6 66.5 177.3 176.5 66.6 311.1 119.6 46.8 328.2 335.4 111 111.4
LOS by Move: F E F F E F F D F F F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 54 29 46 40 33 79 22 11 68 42 27 27
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-33
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #9: De Anza Blvd and McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:137 2337***254
Lanes:0 1 3 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
212 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 118***
1
Loss Time (sec):9
1
120 0 Critical V/C:1.035 0 188
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):87.3 0
363*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):70.7 2 235
LOS:E
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:469***1296 138
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Added Vol: 8 103 63 86 189 11 6 9 6 63 13 74
App+Div: 51 154 2 28 147 21 23 0 27 0 0 23
Initial Fut: 469 1296 138 254 2337 137 212 120 363 235 188 118
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 469 1296 138 254 2337 137 212 120 363 235 188 118
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 469 1296 138 254 2337 137 212 120 363 235 188 118
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 469 1296 138 254 2337 137 212 120 363 235 188 118
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.69 0.31 1.00 3.76 0.24 1.31 0.69 1.00 2.00 0.59 0.41
Final Sat.: 1750 5109 544 1750 7145 419 2301 1302 1750 3150 1130 709
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.27 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.07 0.17 0.17
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 36.2 51.2 51.2 29.3 44.2 44.2 28.0 28.0 28.0 22.5 22.5 22.5
Volume/Cap: 1.04 0.69 0.69 0.69 1.04 1.04 0.46 0.46 1.04 0.46 1.04 1.04
Delay/Veh: 103.6 38.8 38.8 56.9 76.2 76.2 49.8 49.8 113.5 54.0 121 120.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 103.6 38.8 38.8 56.9 76.2 76.2 49.8 49.8 113.5 54.0 121 120.6
LOS by Move: F D+ D+ E+ E-E-D D F D-F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 29 18 18 12 34 34 7 7 23 6 19 19
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-34
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #9: De Anza Blvd and McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:135 2375***237
Lanes:0 1 3 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
210 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 101
1
Loss Time (sec):9
1
118 0 Critical V/C:1.037 0 187***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):87.2 0
363*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):70.2 2 233
LOS:E
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:469***1338 126
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Added Vol: 8 145 51 69 227 9 4 7 6 61 12 57
App+Div: 51 154 2 28 147 21 23 0 27 0 0 23
Initial Fut: 469 1338 126 237 2375 135 210 118 363 233 187 101
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 469 1338 126 237 2375 135 210 118 363 233 187 101
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 469 1338 126 237 2375 135 210 118 363 233 187 101
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 469 1338 126 237 2375 135 210 118 363 233 187 101
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.93 0.95 0.92 0.83 0.95 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.73 0.27 1.00 3.78 0.22 1.29 0.71 1.00 2.00 0.65 0.35
Final Sat.: 1750 5117 482 1750 7096 403 2273 1277 1750 3150 1169 631
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.27 0.26 0.26 0.14 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.07 0.16 0.16
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 36.2 53.6 53.6 27.8 45.2 45.2 28.0 28.0 28.0 21.6 21.6 21.6
Volume/Cap: 1.04 0.68 0.68 0.68 1.04 1.04 0.46 0.46 1.04 0.48 1.04 1.04
Delay/Veh: 104.1 37.0 37.0 57.5 76.1 76.1 49.8 49.8 113.9 54.8 123 123.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 104.1 37.0 37.0 57.5 76.1 76.1 49.8 49.8 113.9 54.8 123 123.1
LOS by Move: F D+ D+ E+ E-E-D D F D-F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 29 18 18 11 35 35 7 7 23 6 19 19
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-35
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #9: De Anza Blvd and McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:134 2730***319
Lanes:0 1 3 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
209 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 178***
1
Loss Time (sec):9
1
118 0 Critical V/C:1.137 0 192
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):123.4 0
370*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):94.3 2 275
LOS:F
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:475***1635 166
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Added Vol: 14 442 91 151 582 8 3 7 13 103 17 134
App+Div: 51 154 2 28 147 21 23 0 27 0 0 23
Initial Fut: 475 1635 166 319 2730 134 209 118 370 275 192 178
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 475 1635 166 319 2730 134 209 118 370 275 192 178
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 475 1635 166 319 2730 134 209 118 370 275 192 178
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 475 1635 166 319 2730 134 209 118 370 275 192 178
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.70 0.30 1.00 3.80 0.20 1.32 0.68 1.00 2.00 0.50 0.50
Final Sat.: 1750 5134 521 1750 7215 354 2303 1300 1750 3150 947 878
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.27 0.32 0.32 0.18 0.38 0.38 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.09 0.20 0.20
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 33.4 50.9 50.9 29.1 46.6 46.6 26.0 26.0 26.0 25.0 25.0 25.0
Volume/Cap: 1.14 0.88 0.88 0.88 1.14 1.14 0.49 0.49 1.14 0.49 1.14 1.14
Delay/Veh: 140.3 46.2 46.2 74.2 114 113.8 51.6 51.6 149.3 52.5 150 149.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 140.3 46.2 46.2 74.2 114 113.8 51.6 51.6 149.3 52.5 150 149.9
LOS by Move: F D D E F F D-D-F D-F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 33 27 27 17 44 44 7 7 26 7 25 25
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-36
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #9: De Anza Blvd and McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:135 2845***329
Lanes:0 1 3 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
209 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 224***
1
Loss Time (sec):9
1
121 0 Critical V/C:1.188 0 203
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):144.6 0
370*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):108.8 2 303
LOS:F
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:476***1677 172
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Added Vol: 15 484 97 161 697 9 3 10 13 131 28 180
App+Div: 51 154 2 28 147 21 23 0 27 0 0 23
Initial Fut: 476 1677 172 329 2845 135 209 121 370 303 203 224
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 476 1677 172 329 2845 135 209 121 370 303 203 224
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 476 1677 172 329 2845 135 209 121 370 303 203 224
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 476 1677 172 329 2845 135 209 121 370 303 203 224
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.70 0.30 1.00 3.80 0.20 1.30 0.70 1.00 2.00 0.45 0.55
Final Sat.: 1750 5129 526 1750 7228 343 2283 1322 1750 3150 864 954
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.27 0.33 0.33 0.19 0.39 0.39 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.10 0.23 0.23
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 32.0 49.8 49.8 28.6 46.4 46.4 24.9 24.9 24.9 27.7 27.7 27.7
Volume/Cap: 1.19 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.19 1.19 0.51 0.51 1.19 0.49 1.19 1.19
Delay/Veh: 161.1 50.6 50.6 82.7 136 135.9 52.8 52.8 169.8 50.5 165 165.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 161.1 50.6 50.6 82.7 136 135.9 52.8 52.8 169.8 50.5 165 165.4
LOS by Move: F D D F F F D-D-F D F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 35 29 29 19 49 49 7 7 28 7 30 30
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-37
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #10: De Anza Blvd and Bollinger Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:163 2489 584***
Lanes:0 1 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
130 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 323
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
124*** 0 Critical V/C:0.759 1 126
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):36.8 0
36 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):25.1 1 260***
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:47 1313***228
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 47 1005 219 552 2147 139 123 124 36 247 126 263
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 47 1005 219 552 2147 139 123 124 36 247 126 263
Added Vol: 0 167 2 5 214 0 0 0 0 5 0 3
App+Div: 0 141 7 27 128 24 7 0 0 8 0 57
Initial Fut: 47 1313 228 584 2489 163 130 124 36 260 126 323
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 47 1313 228 584 2489 163 130 124 36 260 126 323
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 47 1313 228 584 2489 163 130 124 36 260 126 323
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 47 1313 228 584 2489 163 130 124 36 260 126 323
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.52 0.48 2.00 3.73 0.27 2.00 0.76 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 4796 833 3150 7096 465 3150 1445 419 1750 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.27 0.27 0.19 0.35 0.35 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.15 0.07 0.18
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.6 50.5 50.5 34.2 74.2 74.2 9.2 15.8 15.8 27.4 34.0 34.0
Volume/Cap: 0.36 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.66 0.66 0.63 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.27 0.76
Delay/Veh: 59.8 26.3 26.3 42.9 6.4 6.4 69.7 74.9 74.9 62.6 43.3 56.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 59.8 26.3 26.3 42.9 6.4 6.4 69.7 74.9 74.9 62.6 43.3 56.9
LOS by Move: E+ C C D A A E E E E D E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 17 17 14 9 9 4 8 8 13 4 15
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-38
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #10: De Anza Blvd and Bollinger Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:163 2524 584***
Lanes:0 1 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
130 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 322
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
124*** 0 Critical V/C:0.766 1 126
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):37.1 0
36 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):25.2 1 260***
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:47 1326***228
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 47 1005 219 552 2147 139 123 124 36 247 126 263
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 47 1005 219 552 2147 139 123 124 36 247 126 263
Added Vol: 0 180 2 5 249 0 0 0 0 5 0 2
App+Div: 0 141 7 27 128 24 7 0 0 8 0 57
Initial Fut: 47 1326 228 584 2524 163 130 124 36 260 126 322
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 47 1326 228 584 2524 163 130 124 36 260 126 322
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 47 1326 228 584 2524 163 130 124 36 260 126 322
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 47 1326 228 584 2524 163 130 124 36 260 126 322
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.54 0.46 2.00 3.75 0.25 2.00 0.78 0.22 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 4777 821 3150 7044 455 3150 1395 405 1750 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.28 0.28 0.19 0.36 0.36 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.15 0.07 0.18
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.4 50.7 50.7 33.9 74.2 74.2 9.3 16.2 16.2 27.2 34.1 34.1
Volume/Cap: 0.36 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.68 0.68 0.62 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.27 0.75
Delay/Veh: 60.1 26.3 26.3 43.5 6.4 6.4 69.4 75.6 75.6 63.4 43.2 56.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 60.1 26.3 26.3 43.5 6.4 6.4 69.4 75.6 75.6 63.4 43.2 56.6
LOS by Move: E C C D A A E E-E-E D E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 17 17 15 10 10 4 9 9 13 4 15
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-39
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #10: De Anza Blvd and Bollinger Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:163 2784 587***
Lanes:0 1 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
130*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 325***
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
124 0 Critical V/C:0.778 1 126
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):35.6 0
36 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):22.9 1 200
LOS:C+
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:47 1513***169
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 47 1005 219 552 2147 139 123 124 36 247 126 263
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 47 1005 219 552 2147 139 123 124 36 247 126 263
Added Vol: 0 367 -57 8 509 0 0 0 0 -55 0 5
App+Div: 0 141 7 27 128 24 7 0 0 8 0 57
Initial Fut: 47 1513 169 587 2784 163 130 124 36 200 126 325
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 47 1513 169 587 2784 163 130 124 36 200 126 325
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 47 1513 169 587 2784 163 130 124 36 200 126 325
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 47 1513 169 587 2784 163 130 124 36 200 126 325
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.68 0.32 2.00 3.76 0.24 2.00 0.76 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 5084 568 3150 7146 418 3150 1445 419 1750 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.30 0.30 0.19 0.39 0.39 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.07 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 9.9 53.6 53.6 33.5 77.2 77.2 7.4 17.5 17.5 23.3 33.4 33.4
Volume/Cap: 0.38 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.71 0.71 0.78 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.28 0.78
Delay/Veh: 60.9 24.1 24.1 44.4 4.7 4.7 85.8 66.8 66.8 61.5 43.8 58.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 60.9 24.1 24.1 44.4 4.7 4.7 85.8 66.8 66.8 61.5 43.8 58.8
LOS by Move: E C C D A A F E E E D E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 18 18 15 9 9 5 8 8 10 4 16
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-40
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #10: De Anza Blvd and Bollinger Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:163 2924 587***
Lanes:0 1 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
130*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 326***
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
124 0 Critical V/C:0.788 1 126
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):35.5 0
36 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):22.6 1 206
LOS:C+
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:47 1561***171
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 47 1005 219 552 2147 139 123 124 36 247 126 263
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 47 1005 219 552 2147 139 123 124 36 247 126 263
Added Vol: 0 415 -55 8 649 0 0 0 0 -49 0 6
App+Div: 0 141 7 27 128 24 7 0 0 8 0 57
Initial Fut: 47 1561 171 587 2924 163 130 124 36 206 126 326
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 47 1561 171 587 2924 163 130 124 36 206 126 326
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 47 1561 171 587 2924 163 130 124 36 206 126 326
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 47 1561 171 587 2924 163 130 124 36 206 126 326
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.68 0.32 2.00 3.77 0.23 2.00 0.76 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 5094 558 3150 7166 399 3150 1445 419 1750 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.31 0.31 0.19 0.41 0.41 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.12 0.07 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 9.6 54.5 54.5 33.1 78.0 78.0 7.3 17.1 17.1 23.4 33.1 33.1
Volume/Cap: 0.39 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.73 0.73 0.79 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.28 0.79
Delay/Veh: 61.5 23.7 23.7 45.4 4.4 4.4 87.4 68.7 68.7 62.6 44.1 59.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 61.5 23.7 23.7 45.4 4.4 4.4 87.4 68.7 68.7 62.6 44.1 59.9
LOS by Move: E C C D A A F E E E D E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 19 19 15 9 9 5 8 8 10 4 16
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-41
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #11: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:233 2528***0
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 483
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.873 1!3***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):23.5 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):16.4 1 206
LOS:B
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:411***1154 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 394 1011 0 0 2221 233 0 0 0 197 3 478
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 394 1011 0 0 2221 233 0 0 0 197 3 478
Added Vol: 17 84 0 0 219 0 0 0 0 9 0 85
App+Div: 0 59 0 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 41
Initial Fut: 411 1154 0 0 2528 233 0 0 0 206 3 604
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 411 1154 0 0 2528 233 0 0 0 206 3 483
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 411 1154 0 0 2528 233 0 0 0 206 3 483
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 411 1154 0 0 2528 233 0 0 0 206 3 483
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.73 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.30 0.01 1.69
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 5181 478 0 0 0 2269 15 2967
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.20 0.16
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 20.9 99.2 0.0 0.0 78.2 78.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.8 31.8 31.8
Volume/Cap: 0.87 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.87 0.72
Delay/Veh: 67.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.1 62.6 52.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 67.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.1 7.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.1 62.6 52.5
LOS by Move: E A A A A A A A A D E D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 10 0 0 0 17 17 0 0 0 6 18 13
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-42
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #11: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:233 2563***0
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 473
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.889 1!3***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):24.4 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):16.9 1 212
LOS:B
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:437***1179 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 394 1011 0 0 2221 233 0 0 0 197 3 478
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 394 1011 0 0 2221 233 0 0 0 197 3 478
Added Vol: 43 109 0 0 254 0 0 0 0 15 0 72
App+Div: 0 59 0 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 41
Initial Fut: 437 1179 0 0 2563 233 0 0 0 212 3 591
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 437 1179 0 0 2563 233 0 0 0 212 3 473
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 437 1179 0 0 2563 233 0 0 0 212 3 473
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 437 1179 0 0 2563 233 0 0 0 212 3 473
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.74 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.31 0.01 1.68
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 5133 467 0 0 0 2298 15 3021
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.19 0.16
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 21.9 101 0.0 0.0 78.7 78.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.5 30.5 30.5
Volume/Cap: 0.89 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.89 0.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.89 0.72
Delay/Veh: 68.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.4 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.4 65.4 53.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 68.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.4 7.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.4 65.4 53.4
LOS by Move: E A A A A A A A A D E D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 0 0 0 18 18 0 0 0 7 18 13
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-43
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #11: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:233 2763***0
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 502
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.964 1!3***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):33.7 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):22.6 1 233
LOS:C+
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:508***1272 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 394 1011 0 0 2221 233 0 0 0 197 3 478
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 394 1011 0 0 2221 233 0 0 0 197 3 478
Added Vol: 114 202 0 0 454 0 0 0 0 36 0 108
App+Div: 0 59 0 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 41
Initial Fut: 508 1272 0 0 2763 233 0 0 0 233 3 627
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 508 1272 0 0 2763 233 0 0 0 233 3 502
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 508 1272 0 0 2763 233 0 0 0 233 3 502
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 508 1272 0 0 2763 233 0 0 0 233 3 502
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.75 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.31 0.01 1.68
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 5222 440 0 0 0 2301 14 2936
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.21 0.17
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.4 100 0.0 0.0 76.9 76.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.7 30.7 30.7
Volume/Cap: 0.96 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.96 0.78
Delay/Veh: 80.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.7 78.0 55.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 80.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.0 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.7 78.0 55.6
LOS by Move: F A A A B B A A A D E-E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 13 0 0 0 35 35 0 0 0 7 22 15
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-44
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #11: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:233 2909***0
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 520
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.003 1!3***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):41.7 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):27.8 1 238
LOS:C
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:522***1299 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 394 1011 0 0 2221 233 0 0 0 197 3 478
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 394 1011 0 0 2221 233 0 0 0 197 3 478
Added Vol: 128 229 0 0 600 0 0 0 0 41 0 131
App+Div: 0 59 0 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 41
Initial Fut: 522 1299 0 0 2909 233 0 0 0 238 3 650
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 522 1299 0 0 2909 233 0 0 0 238 3 520
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 522 1299 0 0 2909 233 0 0 0 238 3 520
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 522 1299 0 0 2909 233 0 0 0 238 3 520
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 2.76 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.31 0.01 1.68
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 5244 420 0 0 0 2295 14 2942
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.22 0.18
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.1 101 0.0 0.0 77.4 77.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.4 30.4 30.4
Volume/Cap: 1.00 0.32 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 1.00 0.81
Delay/Veh: 90.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.3 22.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.0 88.2 57.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 90.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.3 22.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.0 88.2 57.6
LOS by Move: F A A A C+ C+ A A A D F E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 14 0 0 0 50 50 0 0 0 8 23 16
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-45
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #12: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 1887 827***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
202 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
3*** 1! Critical V/C:0.811 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):37.1 0
572 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):22.2 0 0
LOS:C+
Lanes:0 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:0 1352***193
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1191 188 682 1716 0 202 2 546 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1191 188 682 1716 0 202 2 546 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 102 5 105 123 0 0 1 26 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 59 0 40 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1352 193 827 1887 0 202 3 572 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1352 193 827 1887 0 202 3 572 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1352 193 827 1887 0 202 3 572 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1352 193 827 1887 0 202 3 572 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.60 0.40 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.26 0.01 1.73 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 4935 704 3150 5700 0 2203 13 3034 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.26 0.33 0.00 0.09 0.22 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 47.3 47.3 45.3 92.6 0.0 38.4 38.4 38.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.50 0.00 0.33 0.81 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 30.7 30.7 34.6 0.1 0.0 40.6 52.7 47.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 30.7 30.7 34.6 0.1 0.0 40.6 52.7 47.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A C C C-A A D D-D A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 19 19 17 0 0 6 19 14 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-46
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #12: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 1929 826***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
202 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
3*** 1! Critical V/C:0.826 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):37.5 0
592 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):22.3 0 0
LOS:C+
Lanes:0 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:0 1403***201
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1191 188 682 1716 0 202 2 546 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1191 188 682 1716 0 202 2 546 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 153 13 104 165 0 0 1 46 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 59 0 40 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1403 201 826 1929 0 202 3 592 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1403 201 826 1929 0 202 3 592 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1403 201 826 1929 0 202 3 592 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1403 201 826 1929 0 202 3 592 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.61 0.39 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.26 0.01 1.73 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 4897 702 3150 5700 0 2201 13 3122 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.26 0.34 0.00 0.09 0.22 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 48.6 48.6 44.5 93.0 0.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.51 0.00 0.34 0.83 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 30.1 30.1 36.2 0.1 0.0 41.0 53.8 47.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 30.1 30.1 36.2 0.1 0.0 41.0 53.8 47.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A C C D+ A A D D-D A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 20 20 17 0 0 6 19 15 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-47
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #12: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 2059 917***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
202 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
3*** 1! Critical V/C:0.913 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):44.0 0
653 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):25.9 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:0 1566***226
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1191 188 682 1716 0 202 2 546 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1191 188 682 1716 0 202 2 546 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 316 38 195 295 0 0 1 107 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 59 0 40 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1566 226 917 2059 0 202 3 653 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1566 226 917 2059 0 202 3 653 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1566 226 917 2059 0 202 3 653 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1566 226 917 2059 0 202 3 653 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.59 0.41 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.23 0.01 1.76 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 4928 711 3150 5700 0 2161 12 3078 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.29 0.36 0.00 0.09 0.25 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 48.7 48.7 44.6 93.3 0.0 37.7 37.7 37.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.54 0.00 0.35 0.91 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 35.2 35.2 43.9 0.2 0.0 41.3 62.6 51.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 35.2 35.2 43.9 0.2 0.0 41.3 62.6 51.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D+ D+ D A A D E D-A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 25 25 21 0 0 6 23 18 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-48
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #12: De Anza Blvd and SR-85 SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 2115 1012***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
202 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
4*** 1! Critical V/C:0.959 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):50.8 0
667 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.5 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:0 1607***230
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd SR-85 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1191 188 682 1716 0 202 2 546 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1191 188 682 1716 0 202 2 546 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 357 42 290 351 0 0 2 121 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 59 0 40 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1607 230 1012 2115 0 202 4 667 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1607 230 1012 2115 0 202 4 667 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1607 230 1012 2115 0 202 4 667 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1607 230 1012 2115 0 202 4 667 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.60 0.40 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.23 0.01 1.76 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 4933 706 3150 5700 0 2153 16 3082 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.32 0.37 0.00 0.09 0.25 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 47.6 47.6 46.9 94.4 0.0 36.6 36.6 36.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.55 0.00 0.36 0.96 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 42.1 42.1 48.9 0.2 0.0 42.3 71.5 54.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 42.1 42.1 48.9 0.2 0.0 42.3 71.5 54.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D D D A A D E D-A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 28 28 24 0 0 6 25 19 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-49
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #13: Homestead Road and Blaney Road/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:3 1***0
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Permit Signal=Permit
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
1 0
Cycle Time (sec):80
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
1052*** 1 Critical V/C:0.599 1 1246
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):19.3 0
304 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):16.4 1 277
LOS:B
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:290***1 165
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Road/Driveway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 89 1 139 0 1 3 1 953 245 216 1052 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 89 1 139 0 1 3 1 953 245 216 1052 0
Added Vol: 186 0 22 0 0 0 0 72 44 57 166 0
App+Div: 15 0 4 0 0 0 0 27 15 4 28 0
Initial Fut: 290 1 165 0 1 3 1 1052 304 277 1246 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 290 1 165 0 1 3 1 1052 304 277 1246 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 290 1 165 0 1 3 1 1052 304 277 1246 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 290 1 165 0 1 3 1 1052 304 277 1246 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.01 0.99 0.00 0.23 0.77 0.01 1.52 0.47 1.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1750 11 1740 0 446 1339 3 2890 835 1750 3800 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.16 0.33 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.1 19.1 19.1 0.0 10.0 10.0 41.9 41.9 41.9 41.9 41.9 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.69 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.30 0.63 0.00
Delay/Veh: 31.0 25.8 25.8 0.0 30.7 30.7 15.4 15.4 15.4 11.0 14.1 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 31.0 25.8 25.8 0.0 30.7 30.7 15.4 15.4 15.4 11.0 14.1 0.0
LOS by Move: C C C A C C B B B B+ B A
HCM2kAvgQ: 8 4 4 0 0 0 14 14 14 4 11 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-50
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #13: Homestead Road and Blaney Road/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:3 1***0
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Permit Signal=Permit
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
1 0
Cycle Time (sec):80
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
1062*** 1 Critical V/C:0.564 1 1259
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):17.0 0
284 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):14.0 1 274
LOS:B
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:223***1 163
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Road/Driveway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 89 1 139 0 1 3 1 953 245 216 1052 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 89 1 139 0 1 3 1 953 245 216 1052 0
Added Vol: 119 0 20 0 0 0 0 82 24 54 179 0
App+Div: 15 0 4 0 0 0 0 27 15 4 28 0
Initial Fut: 223 1 163 0 1 3 1 1062 284 274 1259 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 223 1 163 0 1 3 1 1062 284 274 1259 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 223 1 163 0 1 3 1 1062 284 274 1259 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 223 1 163 0 1 3 1 1062 284 274 1259 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.97 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.01 0.99 0.00 0.25 0.75 0.01 1.57 0.42 1.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1800 11 1789 0 450 1350 3 2838 759 1750 3700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.16 0.34 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 15.2 15.2 15.2 0.0 10.0 10.0 45.8 45.8 45.8 45.8 45.8 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.65 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.27 0.59 0.00
Delay/Veh: 32.6 29.4 29.4 0.0 30.7 30.7 12.4 12.4 12.4 8.8 11.5 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 32.6 29.4 29.4 0.0 30.7 30.7 12.4 12.4 12.4 8.8 11.5 0.0
LOS by Move: C-C C A C C B B B A B+ A
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 4 4 0 0 0 13 13 13 4 11 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-51
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #13: Homestead Road and Blaney Road/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:3 1***0
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Permit Signal=Permit
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
1 0
Cycle Time (sec):80
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
1404*** 1 Critical V/C:0.749 1 1715
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):25.7 0
328 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):21.5 1 293
LOS:C+
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:348***1 175
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Road/Driveway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 89 1 139 0 1 3 1 953 245 216 1052 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 89 1 139 0 1 3 1 953 245 216 1052 0
Added Vol: 244 0 32 0 0 0 0 424 68 73 635 0
App+Div: 15 0 4 0 0 0 0 27 15 4 28 0
Initial Fut: 348 1 175 0 1 3 1 1404 328 293 1715 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 348 1 175 0 1 3 1 1404 328 293 1715 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 348 1 175 0 1 3 1 1404 328 293 1715 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 348 1 175 0 1 3 1 1404 328 293 1715 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.01 0.99 0.00 0.23 0.77 0.01 1.59 0.40 1.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1750 10 1741 0 446 1339 2 3029 708 1750 3800 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.17 0.45 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 18.3 18.3 18.3 0.0 10.0 10.0 42.7 42.7 42.7 42.7 42.7 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.87 0.44 0.44 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.31 0.85 0.00
Delay/Veh: 42.5 26.7 26.7 0.0 30.7 30.7 20.6 20.6 20.6 10.6 19.4 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 42.5 26.7 26.7 0.0 30.7 30.7 20.6 20.6 20.6 10.6 19.4 0.0
LOS by Move: D C C A C C C+ C+ C+ B+ B-A
HCM2kAvgQ: 12 4 4 0 0 0 22 22 22 4 21 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-52
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #13: Homestead Road and Blaney Road/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:3 1***0
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Permit Signal=Permit
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
1 0
Cycle Time (sec):80
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
1425*** 1 Critical V/C:0.786 1 1763
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):30.0 0
346 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):25.0 1 303
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:387***1 181
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Road/Driveway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 89 1 139 0 1 3 1 953 245 216 1052 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 89 1 139 0 1 3 1 953 245 216 1052 0
Added Vol: 283 0 38 0 0 0 0 445 86 83 683 0
App+Div: 15 0 4 0 0 0 0 27 15 4 28 0
Initial Fut: 387 1 181 0 1 3 1 1425 346 303 1763 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 387 1 181 0 1 3 1 1425 346 303 1763 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 387 1 181 0 1 3 1 1425 346 303 1763 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 387 1 181 0 1 3 1 1425 346 303 1763 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.01 0.99 0.00 0.23 0.77 0.01 1.58 0.41 1.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1750 10 1741 0 446 1339 2 3005 730 1750 3800 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.17 0.46 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.4 19.4 19.4 0.0 10.0 10.0 41.6 41.6 41.6 41.6 41.6 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.91 0.43 0.43 0.00 0.02 0.02 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.33 0.89 0.00
Delay/Veh: 47.2 25.8 25.8 0.0 30.7 30.7 24.5 24.5 24.5 11.4 22.8 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 47.2 25.8 25.8 0.0 30.7 30.7 24.5 24.5 24.5 11.4 22.8 0.0
LOS by Move: D C C A C C C C C B+ C+ A
HCM2kAvgQ: 14 4 4 0 0 0 25 25 25 5 23 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-53
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #14: El Camino Real and Wolfe Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:114 1361***238
Lanes:1 0 3 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
94 1
Cycle Time (sec):150
1 141
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1200 3 Critical V/C:0.832 3 786
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):60.3 0
482*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):51.8 2 363***
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:429***703 192
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road El Camino Real
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 345 576 178 219 1197 106 87 1072 403 329 703 127
Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 373 622 192 237 1293 114 94 1158 435 355 759 137
Added Vol: 28 58 0 1 44 0 0 1 9 2 5 4
App+Div: 28 23 0 0 24 0 0 41 38 6 22 0
Initial Fut: 429 703 192 238 1361 114 94 1200 482 363 786 141
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 429 703 192 238 1361 114 94 1200 482 363 786 141
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 429 703 192 238 1361 114 94 1200 482 363 786 141
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 429 703 192 238 1361 114 94 1200 482 363 786 141
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 1750 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.19 0.11 0.14 0.24 0.07 0.05 0.21 0.28 0.12 0.14 0.08
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 24.5 39.0 39.0 28.6 43.0 62.8 19.7 49.7 49.7 20.8 50.7 50.7
Volume/Cap: 0.83 0.71 0.42 0.71 0.83 0.16 0.41 0.64 0.83 0.83 0.41 0.24
Delay/Veh: 71.8 52.9 46.8 63.9 53.9 27.2 60.9 43.2 56.3 75.7 38.3 36.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 71.8 52.9 46.8 63.9 53.9 27.2 60.9 43.2 56.3 75.7 38.3 36.0
LOS by Move: E D-D E D-C E D E+ E-D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 14 7 12 21 3 5 16 24 12 9 5
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-54
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #14: El Camino Real and Wolfe Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:114 1365***238
Lanes:1 0 3 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
94 1
Cycle Time (sec):150
1 141
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1200 3 Critical V/C:0.833 3 786
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):60.3 0
482*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):51.8 2 363***
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:429***716 192
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road El Camino Real
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 345 576 178 219 1197 106 87 1072 403 329 703 127
Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 373 622 192 237 1293 114 94 1158 435 355 759 137
Added Vol: 28 71 0 1 48 0 0 1 9 2 5 4
App+Div: 28 23 0 0 24 0 0 41 38 6 22 0
Initial Fut: 429 716 192 238 1365 114 94 1200 482 363 786 141
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 429 716 192 238 1365 114 94 1200 482 363 786 141
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 429 716 192 238 1365 114 94 1200 482 363 786 141
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 429 716 192 238 1365 114 94 1200 482 363 786 141
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 1750 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.19 0.11 0.14 0.24 0.07 0.05 0.21 0.28 0.12 0.14 0.08
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 24.5 39.3 39.3 28.3 43.1 62.8 19.7 49.6 49.6 20.8 50.7 50.7
Volume/Cap: 0.83 0.72 0.42 0.72 0.83 0.16 0.41 0.64 0.83 0.83 0.41 0.24
Delay/Veh: 71.9 52.9 46.5 64.6 53.9 27.2 61.0 43.3 56.4 75.8 38.3 36.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 71.9 52.9 46.5 64.6 53.9 27.2 61.0 43.3 56.4 75.8 38.3 36.0
LOS by Move: E D-D E D-C E D E+ E-D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 14 7 12 22 3 5 16 24 12 9 5
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-55
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #14: El Camino Real and Wolfe Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:114 1467***238
Lanes:1 0 3 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
94 1
Cycle Time (sec):150
1 141
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1201 3 Critical V/C:0.854 3 787
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):61.3 0
482*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):52.8 2 363***
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:432***835 192
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road El Camino Real
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 345 576 178 219 1197 106 87 1072 403 329 703 127
Growth Adj:1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 373 622 192 237 1293 114 94 1158 435 355 759 137
Added Vol: 31 190 0 1 150 0 0 2 9 2 6 4
App+Div: 28 23 0 0 24 0 0 41 38 6 22 0
Initial Fut: 432 835 192 238 1467 114 94 1201 482 363 787 141
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 432 835 192 238 1467 114 94 1201 482 363 787 141
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 432 835 192 238 1467 114 94 1201 482 363 787 141
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 432 835 192 238 1467 114 94 1201 482 363 787 141
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 1750 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.22 0.11 0.14 0.26 0.07 0.05 0.21 0.28 0.12 0.14 0.08
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 24.1 42.8 42.8 26.5 45.2 64.5 19.2 48.4 48.4 20.3 49.5 49.5
Volume/Cap: 0.85 0.77 0.38 0.77 0.85 0.15 0.42 0.65 0.85 0.85 0.42 0.24
Delay/Veh: 74.5 52.5 43.5 70.1 53.7 26.2 61.5 44.4 59.5 78.7 39.2 36.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 74.5 52.5 43.5 70.1 53.7 26.2 61.5 44.4 59.5 78.7 39.2 36.9
LOS by Move: E D-D E D-C E D E+ E-D D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 16 7 13 23 3 5 16 25 12 9 5
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-56
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #14: El Camino Real and Wolfe Road (SUN/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:114 1479***238
Lanes:1 0 3 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
94 1
Cycle Time (sec):150
1 141
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1201 3 Critical V/C:0.859 3 787
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):61.7 0
484*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):53.2 2 363***
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:438***867 192
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road El Camino Real
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 345 576 178 219 1197 106 87 1072 403 329 703 127
Growth Adj:1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 373 622 192 237 1293 114 94 1158 435 355 759 137
Added Vol: 37 222 0 1 162 0 0 2 11 2 6 4
App+Div: 28 23 0 0 24 0 0 41 38 6 22 0
Initial Fut: 438 867 192 238 1479 114 94 1201 484 363 787 141
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 438 867 192 238 1479 114 94 1201 484 363 787 141
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 438 867 192 238 1479 114 94 1201 484 363 787 141
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 438 867 192 238 1479 114 94 1201 484 363 787 141
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 1750 5700 1750 1750 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.23 0.11 0.14 0.26 0.07 0.05 0.21 0.28 0.12 0.14 0.08
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 24.3 43.6 43.6 25.9 45.3 64.5 19.2 48.3 48.3 20.1 49.3 49.3
Volume/Cap: 0.86 0.78 0.38 0.78 0.86 0.15 0.42 0.65 0.86 0.86 0.42 0.25
Delay/Veh: 74.9 52.7 42.9 72.0 54.0 26.2 61.6 44.5 60.2 79.6 39.4 37.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 74.9 52.7 42.9 72.0 54.0 26.2 61.6 44.5 60.2 79.6 39.4 37.0
LOS by Move: E D-D E D-C E D E E-D D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 17 7 13 24 3 5 16 25 12 9 5
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-57
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #15: Wolfe Road and Fremont Ave (SUN)
Signal=Perm+Prot/Rights=Include
Final Vol:589 1738***63
Lanes:0 1 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
324 2
Cycle Time (sec):150
0 26
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
354 2 Critical V/C:0.863 0 38
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):43.3 0
306*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):51.8 1 10***
LOS:D-
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:251***1031 77
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Fremont Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 189 829 56 58 1496 544 299 317 258 4 25 24
Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 204 895 60 63 1616 588 323 342 279 4 27 26
Added Vol: 35 85 12 0 55 1 1 12 14 6 11 0
App+Div: 12 51 5 0 67 0 0 0 13 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 251 1031 77 63 1738 589 324 354 306 10 38 26
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 251 1031 77 63 1738 589 324 354 306 10 38 26
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 251 1031 77 63 1738 589 324 354 306 10 38 26
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 251 1031 77 63 1738 589 324 354 306 10 38 26
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.77 0.23 0.08 2.14 0.78 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.57 0.43
Final Sat.: 1750 5270 396 146 4052 1372 3150 3800 1750 1750 1092 745
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.10 0.09 0.17 0.01 0.03 0.03
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 25.7 32.1 32.1 73.3 76.7 76.7 21.6 28.6 28.6 7.0 14.0 14.0
Volume/Cap: 0.84 0.92 0.92 0.88 0.84 0.84 0.71 0.49 0.92 0.13 0.37 0.37
Delay/Veh: 78.6 68.4 68.4 37.9 33.7 33.7 66.5 54.7 88.2 69.3 65.2 65.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 78.6 68.4 68.4 37.9 33.7 33.7 66.5 54.7 88.2 69.3 65.2 65.2
LOS by Move: E-E E D+ C-C-E D-F E E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 12 18 18 33 31 31 10 8 18 1 3 3
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-58
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #15: Wolfe Road and Fremont Ave (SUN)
Signal=Perm+Prot/Rights=Include
Final Vol:589 1742***63
Lanes:0 1 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
324 2
Cycle Time (sec):150
0 26
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
361 2 Critical V/C:0.873 0 45
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):44.3 0
308*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):53.0 1 16***
LOS:D-
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:255***1044 86
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Fremont Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 189 829 56 58 1496 544 299 317 258 4 25 24
Growth Adj:1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 204 895 60 63 1616 588 323 342 279 4 27 26
Added Vol: 39 98 21 0 59 1 1 19 16 12 18 0
App+Div: 12 51 5 0 67 0 0 0 13 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 255 1044 86 63 1742 589 324 361 308 16 45 26
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 255 1044 86 63 1742 589 324 361 308 16 45 26
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 255 1044 86 63 1742 589 324 361 308 16 45 26
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 255 1044 86 63 1742 589 324 361 308 16 45 26
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.76 0.24 0.08 2.17 0.75 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.63 0.37
Final Sat.: 1750 5171 428 144 4003 1353 3150 3800 1750 1750 1142 658
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.10 0.10 0.18 0.01 0.04 0.04
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 25.8 32.5 32.5 73.1 76.9 76.9 21.4 28.3 28.3 7.0 13.9 13.9
Volume/Cap: 0.85 0.93 0.93 0.89 0.85 0.85 0.72 0.50 0.93 0.20 0.43 0.43
Delay/Veh: 80.0 70.2 70.2 39.1 34.1 34.1 67.0 55.1 91.9 70.0 66.0 66.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 80.0 70.2 70.2 39.1 34.1 34.1 67.0 55.1 91.9 70.0 66.0 66.0
LOS by Move: E-E E D C-C-E E+ F E E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 13 19 19 34 32 32 10 8 19 1 4 4
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-59
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #15: Wolfe Road and Fremont Ave (SUN)
Signal=Perm+Prot/Rights=Include
Final Vol:592 1840***63
Lanes:0 1 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
330 2
Cycle Time (sec):150
0 26
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
377 2 Critical V/C:0.896 0 54
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):46.4 0
307*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):56.0 1 25***
LOS:E+
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:272***1160 96
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Fremont Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 189 829 56 58 1496 544 299 317 258 4 25 24
Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 204 895 60 63 1616 588 323 342 279 4 27 26
Added Vol: 56 214 31 0 157 4 7 35 15 21 27 0
App+Div: 12 51 5 0 67 0 0 0 13 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 272 1160 96 63 1840 592 330 377 307 25 54 26
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 272 1160 96 63 1840 592 330 377 307 25 54 26
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 272 1160 96 63 1840 592 330 377 307 25 54 26
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 272 1160 96 63 1840 592 330 377 307 25 54 26
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.75 0.25 0.08 2.16 0.76 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.66 0.34
Final Sat.: 1750 5228 435 140 4112 1322 3150 3800 1750 1750 1249 600
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.10 0.10 0.18 0.01 0.04 0.04
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 26.8 34.4 34.4 72.4 77.0 77.0 20.9 27.2 27.2 7.0 13.3 13.3
Volume/Cap: 0.87 0.97 0.97 0.93 0.87 0.87 0.75 0.55 0.97 0.31 0.49 0.49
Delay/Veh: 82.2 74.8 74.8 42.6 35.3 35.3 69.2 56.8 102.5 71.3 67.4 67.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 82.2 74.8 74.8 42.6 35.3 35.3 69.2 56.8 102.5 71.3 67.4 67.4
LOS by Move: F E E D D+ D+ E E+ F E E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 14 21 21 36 33 33 10 8 20 2 4 4
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-60
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #15: Wolfe Road and Fremont Ave (SUN)
Signal=Perm+Prot/Rights=Include
Final Vol:592 1854***63
Lanes:0 1 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
330 2
Cycle Time (sec):150
0 26
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
385 2 Critical V/C:0.923 0 59
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):50.4 0
318*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):59.3 1 31***
LOS:E+
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:300***1197 101
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Fremont Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 189 829 56 58 1496 544 299 317 258 4 25 24
Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08
Initial Bse: 204 895 60 63 1616 588 323 342 279 4 27 26
Added Vol: 84 251 36 0 171 4 7 43 26 27 32 0
App+Div: 12 51 5 0 67 0 0 0 13 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 300 1197 101 63 1854 592 330 385 318 31 59 26
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 300 1197 101 63 1854 592 330 385 318 31 59 26
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 300 1197 101 63 1854 592 330 385 318 31 59 26
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 300 1197 101 63 1854 592 330 385 318 31 59 26
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.75 0.25 0.08 2.17 0.75 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 0.68 0.32
Final Sat.: 1750 5220 442 139 4121 1315 3150 3800 1750 1750 1286 565
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.10 0.10 0.18 0.02 0.05 0.05
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 28.5 34.9 34.9 71.5 74.8 74.8 21.2 27.6 27.6 7.0 13.5 13.5
Volume/Cap: 0.90 0.99 0.99 0.94 0.90 0.90 0.74 0.55 0.99 0.38 0.51 0.51
Delay/Veh: 85.6 78.6 78.6 45.3 38.8 38.8 68.4 56.5 107.0 72.4 67.8 67.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 85.6 78.6 78.6 45.3 38.8 38.8 68.4 56.5 107.0 72.4 67.8 67.8
LOS by Move: F E-E-D D+ D+ E E+ F E E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 15 22 22 38 35 35 10 8 21 2 4 4
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 10:29:16 2014 Page 10-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #18: Wolfe Road and Homestead Road (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:126 1246***220
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
220 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
0 211
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
823*** 2 Critical V/C:0.971 1 904
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):64.5 0
309 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):51.9 2 801***
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:477***896 423
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 322 758 189 159 1113 121 201 713 251 444 773 108
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 322 758 189 159 1113 121 201 713 251 444 773 108
Added Vol: 135 113 130 14 71 0 0 39 56 170 89 47
App+Div: 20 25 104 47 62 5 19 71 2 187 42 56
Initial Fut: 477 896 423 220 1246 126 220 823 309 801 904 211
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 477 896 423 220 1246 126 220 823 309 801 904 211
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 477 896 423 220 1246 126 220 823 309 801 904 211
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 477 896 423 220 1246 126 220 823 309 801 904 211
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.70 0.30 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.60 0.40
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 3150 5136 519 1750 3800 1750 3150 3032 708
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.24 0.24 0.13 0.22 0.18 0.25 0.30 0.30
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 17.2 34.4 63.3 10.2 27.5 27.5 15.8 24.5 41.7 28.8 37.5 37.5
Volume/Cap: 0.97 0.75 0.42 0.75 0.97 0.97 0.87 0.97 0.47 0.97 0.87 0.87
Delay/Veh: 79.2 36.7 13.4 59.2 58.2 58.2 73.0 66.3 26.3 64.5 41.0 41.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 79.2 36.7 13.4 59.2 58.2 58.2 73.0 66.3 26.3 64.5 41.0 41.0
LOS by Move: E-D+ B E+ E+ E+ E E C E D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 14 15 9 4 17 17 11 19 9 22 21 21
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 10:29:16 2014 Page 10-2
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #18: Wolfe Road and Homestead Road (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:126 1257***220
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
220 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
0 211
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
828*** 2 Critical V/C:0.980 1 908
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):66.7 0
311 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):53.3 2 805***
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:482***921 434
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 322 758 189 159 1113 121 201 713 251 444 773 108
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 322 758 189 159 1113 121 201 713 251 444 773 108
Added Vol: 140 138 141 14 82 0 0 44 58 174 93 47
App+Div: 20 25 104 47 62 5 19 71 2 187 42 56
Initial Fut: 482 921 434 220 1257 126 220 828 311 805 908 211
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 482 921 434 220 1257 126 220 828 311 805 908 211
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 482 921 434 220 1257 126 220 828 311 805 908 211
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 482 921 434 220 1257 126 220 828 311 805 908 211
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.98 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.72 0.28 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.61 0.39
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 3150 5089 510 1750 3800 1750 3150 3002 698
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.24 0.25 0.07 0.25 0.25 0.13 0.22 0.18 0.26 0.30 0.30
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 17.2 34.8 63.5 10.0 27.7 27.7 15.6 24.4 41.6 28.7 37.5 37.5
Volume/Cap: 0.98 0.77 0.43 0.77 0.98 0.98 0.89 0.98 0.47 0.98 0.89 0.89
Delay/Veh: 81.6 36.9 13.4 60.4 60.2 60.2 75.8 68.6 26.4 66.9 42.1 42.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 81.6 36.9 13.4 60.4 60.2 60.2 75.8 68.6 26.4 66.9 42.1 42.1
LOS by Move: F D+ B E E E E-E C E D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 15 16 9 4 18 18 11 19 9 22 22 22
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 10:29:16 2014 Page 10-3
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #18: Wolfe Road and Homestead Road (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:267 1226***220
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
373*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
0 211
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
910 2 Critical V/C:1.169 1 989***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):131.0 0
526 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):96.9 2 811
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:763***925 424
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 322 758 189 159 1113 121 201 713 251 444 773 108
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 322 758 189 159 1113 121 201 713 251 444 773 108
Added Vol: 421 142 131 14 51 141 153 126 273 180 174 47
App+Div: 20 25 104 47 62 5 19 71 2 187 42 56
Initial Fut: 763 925 424 220 1226 267 373 910 526 811 989 211
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 763 925 424 220 1226 267 373 910 526 811 989 211
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 763 925 424 220 1226 267 373 910 526 811 989 211
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 763 925 424 220 1226 267 373 910 526 811 989 211
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.43 0.57 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.62 0.38
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 3150 4610 1004 1750 3800 1750 3150 3085 658
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.27 0.27 0.21 0.24 0.30 0.26 0.32 0.32
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 22.8 37.1 63.2 10.7 25.0 25.0 20.0 24.2 47.0 26.0 30.2 30.2
Volume/Cap: 1.17 0.72 0.42 0.72 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.09 0.70 1.09 1.17 1.17
Delay/Veh: 135.6 33.9 13.5 56.4 127 127.5 149.6 101 28.9 101.8 127 126.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 135.6 33.9 13.5 56.4 127 127.5 149.6 101 28.9 101.8 127 126.8
LOS by Move: F C-B E+ F F F F C F F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 27 15 9 4 26 26 24 24 17 26 34 34
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 10:29:16 2014 Page 10-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #18: Wolfe Road and Homestead Road (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:268 1262***220
Lanes:0 1 2 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
378*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):110
0 212
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
919 2 Critical V/C:1.195 1 999***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):141.7 0
550 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):105.2 2 843
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:797***1006 434
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 322 758 189 159 1113 121 201 713 251 444 773 108
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 322 758 189 159 1113 121 201 713 251 444 773 108
Added Vol: 455 223 141 14 87 142 158 135 297 212 184 48
App+Div: 20 25 104 47 62 5 19 71 2 187 42 56
Initial Fut: 797 1006 434 220 1262 268 378 919 550 843 999 212
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 797 1006 434 220 1262 268 378 919 550 843 999 212
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 797 1006 434 220 1262 268 378 919 550 843 999 212
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 797 1006 434 220 1262 268 378 919 550 843 999 212
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.44 0.56 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.63 0.37
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 3150 4632 984 1750 3800 1750 3150 3088 655
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.25 0.26 0.25 0.07 0.27 0.27 0.22 0.24 0.31 0.27 0.32 0.32
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.3 38.3 64.3 10.1 25.1 25.1 19.9 23.6 46.8 26.1 29.8 29.8
Volume/Cap: 1.20 0.76 0.42 0.76 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.13 0.74 1.13 1.20 1.20
Delay/Veh: 145.5 34.5 12.9 60.0 138 138.3 159.7 117 30.3 116.4 138 137.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 145.5 34.5 12.9 60.0 138 138.3 159.7 117 30.3 116.4 138 137.8
LOS by Move: F C-B E F F F F C F F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 29 16 9 4 27 27 25 26 18 28 36 36
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-65
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #19: Wolfe Road and Apple Campus 2 Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 2217***148
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 372
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.916 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):37.8 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):36.8 2 1445***
LOS:D+
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0***1654 404
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Apple Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1371 0 0 1808 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1371 0 0 1808 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 138 316 104 197 0 0 0 0 1130 0 274
App+Div: 0 145 88 44 212 0 0 0 0 315 0 98
Initial Fut: 0 1654 404 148 2217 0 0 0 0 1445 0 372
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1654 404 148 2217 0 0 0 0 1445 0 372
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1654 404 148 2217 0 0 0 0 1445 0 372
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1654 404 148 2217 0 0 0 0 1445 0 372
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 1750 5700 0 0 0 0 3150 0 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.29 0.23 0.08 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.21
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 39.4 99.5 11.5 50.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.1 0.0 71.6
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.88 0.28 0.88 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.00 0.36
Delay/Veh: 0.0 43.4 2.4 91.8 38.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.4 0.0 12.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 43.4 2.4 91.8 38.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.4 0.0 12.6
LOS by Move: A D A F D+ A A A A D+ A B
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 22 4 9 29 0 0 0 0 33 0 7
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-66
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #19: Wolfe Road and Apple Campus 2 Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 2300***148
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 372
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.932 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):39.4 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):37.8 2 1445***
LOS:D+
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0***1709 404
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Apple Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1371 0 0 1808 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1371 0 0 1808 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 193 316 104 280 0 0 0 0 1130 0 274
App+Div: 0 145 88 44 212 0 0 0 0 315 0 98
Initial Fut: 0 1709 404 148 2300 0 0 0 0 1445 0 372
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1709 404 148 2300 0 0 0 0 1445 0 372
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1709 404 148 2300 0 0 0 0 1445 0 372
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1709 404 148 2300 0 0 0 0 1445 0 372
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 1750 5700 0 0 0 0 3150 0 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.30 0.23 0.08 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.21
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 40.5 99.6 11.4 51.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 59.1 0.0 70.5
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.89 0.28 0.89 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.00 0.36
Delay/Veh: 0.0 43.1 2.4 93.1 39.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.2 0.0 13.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 43.1 2.4 93.1 39.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.2 0.0 13.2
LOS by Move: A D A F D A A A A D A B
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 23 4 9 31 0 0 0 0 34 0 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-67
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #19: Wolfe Road and Apple Campus 2 Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 2530***148
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 372
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.976 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):46.2 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):44.1 2 1445***
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0***2002 404
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Apple Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1371 0 0 1808 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1371 0 0 1808 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 486 316 104 510 0 0 0 0 1130 0 274
App+Div: 0 145 88 44 212 0 0 0 0 315 0 98
Initial Fut: 0 2002 404 148 2530 0 0 0 0 1445 0 372
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2002 404 148 2530 0 0 0 0 1445 0 372
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2002 404 148 2530 0 0 0 0 1445 0 372
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2002 404 148 2530 0 0 0 0 1445 0 372
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 1750 5700 0 0 0 0 3150 0 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.35 0.23 0.08 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.21
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 44.0 100.4 10.6 54.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 56.4 0.0 67.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.96 0.28 0.96 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.38
Delay/Veh: 0.0 48.5 2.2 114.1 44.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.0 0.0 15.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 48.5 2.2 114.1 44.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.0 0.0 15.1
LOS by Move: A D A F D A A A A D A B
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 29 3 9 37 0 0 0 0 38 0 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-68
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #19: Wolfe Road and Apple Campus 2 Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 2621***148
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 372
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.993 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):50.0 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):48.2 2 1445***
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0***2126 404
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Apple Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1371 0 0 1808 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1371 0 0 1808 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 610 316 104 601 0 0 0 0 1130 0 274
App+Div: 0 145 88 44 212 0 0 0 0 315 0 98
Initial Fut: 0 2126 404 148 2621 0 0 0 0 1445 0 372
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2126 404 148 2621 0 0 0 0 1445 0 372
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2126 404 148 2621 0 0 0 0 1445 0 372
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2126 404 148 2621 0 0 0 0 1445 0 372
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 1750 5700 0 0 0 0 3150 0 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.37 0.23 0.08 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.21
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 45.3 100.7 10.3 55.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.4 0.0 65.7
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.99 0.28 0.99 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 0.39
Delay/Veh: 0.0 53.7 2.1 124.6 47.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.0 0.0 15.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 53.7 2.1 124.6 47.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.0 0.0 15.9
LOS by Move: A D-A F D A A A A D-A B
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 32 3 10 39 0 0 0 0 39 0 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-69
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #20: Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:86 3475***39
Lanes:0 1 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
42 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 7
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
3*** 0 Critical V/C:0.905 1 2
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):32.5 0
118 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):26.9 2 49***
LOS:C
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:266***1911 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 236 1173 217 114 1565 58 32 13 110 516 49 166
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 236 1173 217 114 1565 58 32 13 110 516 49 166
Added Vol: 0 449 46 14 1313 0 0 0 0 27 0 5
App+Div: 30 289 -170 -89 597 28 10 -10 8 -494 -47 -164
Initial Fut: 266 1911 93 39 3475 86 42 3 118 49 2 7
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 266 1911 0 39 3475 86 42 3 118 49 2 7
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 266 1911 0 39 3475 86 42 3 118 49 2 7
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 266 1911 0 39 3475 86 42 3 118 49 2 7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.79 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.85 0.79 0.79 1.00 0.76
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.92 0.08 1.00 0.02 0.98 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 2992 3800 1750 1663 5528 137 1663 37 1460 2992 1900 1453
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.50 0.00 0.02 0.63 0.63 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.02 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 11.2 81.3 0.0 9.4 79.5 79.5 7.1 10.2 10.2 7.0 10.1 10.1
Volume/Cap: 0.95 0.74 0.00 0.30 0.95 0.95 0.43 0.95 0.95 0.28 0.01 0.06
Delay/Veh: 93.9 13.7 0.0 53.4 24.7 24.7 57.5 118 118.2 55.0 50.4 50.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 93.9 13.7 0.0 53.4 24.7 24.7 57.5 118 118.2 55.0 50.4 50.7
LOS by Move: F B A D-C C E+ F F D-D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 23 0 2 45 45 2 8 8 1 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1
Lane Group: L T R L RT RT L RT RT L T R
#LnsInGrps: 2 2 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 2 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 8 4 0 6
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 0.85 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 0.95 0.85 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.83
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.79 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.85 0.79 0.79 1.00 0.76
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-70
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (Ped/Bike Sat Adj)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #20 Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
CrsswalkWid: 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 8.00
CrsswalkLen: 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.00 0.00 96.00 0.00 72.00
MinPedGrn: 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.24 0.00 27.20 0.00 21.25
PedGrn: 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.24 0.00 27.20 0.00 21.25
PedVolume: 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 6
PedFlowRate: 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 34
BikeVol: 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1
BikeFlwRate: 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 6
PedOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.017
BikeOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.031 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.022
PedAfterOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
rOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.039
TurnVehAdj: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.950 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.977
Prt: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.024 0.000 0.975 0.000 1.000
Prta: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Plt: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Plta: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
PedBike Adj: 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.999 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.977
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #20 Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 11.2 81.3 0.0 9.4 79.5 79.5 7.1 10.2 10.2 7.0 10.1 10.1
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 5.3 20.6 0.0 1.3 36.0 36.0 1.5 4.3 4.3 0.9 0.1 0.2
UpstreamVC: 0.65 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.72 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 0.20 0.69 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2: 1.5 1.9 0.0 0.4 8.8 8.8 0.7 3.6 3.6 0.4 0.0 0.1
HCM2KQueue: 6.9 22.5 0.0 1.7 44.8 44.8 2.2 8.0 8.0 1.3 0.1 0.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.18 1.16 1.20 1.20 1.13 1.13 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.20 1.20 1.20
HCM2k70thQ: 8.1 26.1 0.0 2.1 50.7 50.7 2.6 9.4 9.4 1.6 0.1 0.4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.54 1.44 1.60 1.58 1.37 1.37 1.58 1.53 1.53 1.59 1.60 1.60
HCM2k85thQ: 10.6 32.5 0.0 2.8 61.3 61.2 3.4 12.2 12.2 2.1 0.1 0.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.68 1.53 1.80 1.77 1.44 1.44 1.76 1.67 1.67 1.77 1.80 1.79
HCM2k90thQ: 11.6 34.5 0.0 3.1 64.6 64.6 3.8 13.3 13.3 2.3 0.1 0.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.91 1.67 2.10 2.04 1.55 1.55 2.03 1.89 1.89 2.06 2.10 2.09
HCM2k95thQ: 13.1 37.7 0.0 3.6 69.4 69.4 4.4 15.0 15.0 2.7 0.2 0.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.29 1.88 2.70 2.57 1.73 1.73 2.55 2.24 2.24 2.60 2.69 2.68
HCM2k98thQ: 15.7 42.3 0.0 4.5 77.6 77.5 5.5 17.9 17.9 3.4 0.2 0.8
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #20 Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 66.1 310 0.0 9.2 789 19.5 10.1 0.7 29.4 11.7 0.5 1.6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 187.353 pounds
30.351 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 584.543 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 46.175 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 8.493 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.669 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 187.353 pounds
30.351 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 584.543 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 46.175 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 8.493 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.669 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-71
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #20: Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:86 3577***33
Lanes:0 1 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
42 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 5
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
3*** 0 Critical V/C:0.909 1 2
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):34.8 0
118 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):28.4 2 38***
LOS:C
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:266***1982 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 236 1173 217 114 1565 58 32 13 110 516 49 166
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 236 1173 217 114 1565 58 32 13 110 516 49 166
Added Vol: 0 520 24 8 1415 0 0 0 0 16 0 3
App+Div: 30 289 -170 -89 597 28 10 -10 8 -494 -47 -164
Initial Fut: 266 1982 71 33 3577 86 42 3 118 38 2 5
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 266 1982 0 33 3577 86 42 3 118 38 2 5
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 266 1982 0 33 3577 86 42 3 118 38 2 5
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 266 1982 0 33 3577 86 42 3 118 38 2 5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.93 0.07 1.00 0.02 0.98 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 1750 5468 131 1750 45 1755 3150 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.52 0.00 0.02 0.65 0.65 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.01 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.4 81.8 0.0 9.2 80.6 80.6 7.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.97 0.76 0.00 0.25 0.97 0.97 0.41 0.81 0.81 0.21 0.01 0.03
Delay/Veh: 101.7 14.1 0.0 53.2 28.2 28.2 57.2 80.6 80.6 54.4 50.5 50.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 101.7 14.1 0.0 53.2 28.2 28.2 57.2 80.6 80.6 54.4 50.5 50.7
LOS by Move: F B A D-C C E+ F F D-D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 24 0 1 50 50 2 7 7 1 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-72
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #20: Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:86 3786***59
Lanes:0 1 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
42 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 14
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
3*** 0 Critical V/C:0.979 1 2
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):46.3 0
118 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):36.8 2 86***
LOS:D+
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:266***2272 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 236 1173 217 114 1565 58 32 13 110 516 49 166
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 236 1173 217 114 1565 58 32 13 110 516 49 166
Added Vol: 0 810 107 34 1624 0 0 0 0 64 0 12
App+Div: 30 289 -170 -89 597 28 10 -10 8 -494 -47 -164
Initial Fut: 266 2272 154 59 3786 86 42 3 118 86 2 14
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 266 2272 0 59 3786 86 42 3 118 86 2 14
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 266 2272 0 59 3786 86 42 3 118 86 2 14
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 266 2272 0 59 3786 86 42 3 118 86 2 14
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.79 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.85 0.79 0.79 1.00 0.76
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.93 0.07 1.00 0.02 0.98 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 2992 3800 1750 1663 5546 126 1663 37 1460 2992 1900 1453
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.60 0.00 0.04 0.68 0.68 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.00 0.01
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.5 82.9 0.0 8.1 80.5 80.5 7.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 1.02 0.87 0.00 0.53 1.02 1.02 0.43 0.97 0.97 0.49 0.01 0.12
Delay/Veh: 115.0 17.5 0.0 58.7 38.9 38.9 57.7 126 125.7 57.0 50.5 51.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 115.0 17.5 0.0 58.7 38.9 38.9 57.7 126 125.7 57.0 50.5 51.3
LOS by Move: F B A E+ D+ D+ E+ F F E+ D D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 32 0 3 57 57 2 8 8 3 0 1
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1
Lane Group: L T R L RT RT L RT RT L T R
#LnsInGrps: 2 2 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 2 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 8 4 0 6
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 0.85 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.83
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.79 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.85 0.79 0.79 1.00 0.76
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-73
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (Ped/Bike Sat Adj)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #20 Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
CrsswalkWid: 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 8.00
CrsswalkLen: 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.00 0.00 96.00 0.00 72.00
MinPedGrn: 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.24 0.00 27.20 0.00 21.25
PedGrn: 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.24 0.00 27.20 0.00 21.25
PedVolume: 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 6
PedFlowRate: 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 34
BikeVol: 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1
BikeFlwRate: 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 6
PedOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.017
BikeOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.031 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.022
PedAfterOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
rOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.039
TurnVehAdj: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.950 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.977
Prt: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.022 0.000 0.975 0.000 1.000
Prta: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Plt: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Plta: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
PedBike Adj: 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.999 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.977
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #20 Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 10.5 82.9 0.0 8.1 80.5 80.5 7.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 10.0
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 5.3 29.1 0.0 2.1 43.1 43.1 1.5 4.4 4.4 1.7 0.1 0.5
UpstreamVC: 0.78 0.78 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 0.15 0.52 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2: 1.9 3.0 0.0 1.0 14.2 14.2 0.7 3.8 3.8 0.9 0.0 0.1
HCM2KQueue: 7.2 32.1 0.0 3.0 57.3 57.2 2.2 8.2 8.2 2.5 0.1 0.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.18 1.14 1.20 1.19 1.12 1.12 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.20
HCM2k70thQ: 8.6 36.7 0.0 3.6 64.4 64.3 2.6 9.6 9.6 3.0 0.1 0.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.54 1.40 1.60 1.57 1.34 1.34 1.58 1.53 1.53 1.58 1.60 1.59
HCM2k85thQ: 11.1 45.0 0.0 4.8 77.0 76.9 3.4 12.5 12.5 4.0 0.1 1.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.68 1.48 1.80 1.74 1.42 1.42 1.76 1.67 1.67 1.75 1.80 1.79
HCM2k90thQ: 12.2 47.5 0.0 5.3 81.5 81.4 3.8 13.6 13.6 4.4 0.1 1.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.90 1.60 2.10 2.01 1.52 1.52 2.03 1.88 1.88 2.02 2.10 2.08
HCM2k95thQ: 13.8 51.3 0.0 6.1 87.3 87.3 4.4 15.3 15.3 5.1 0.2 1.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.27 1.78 2.70 2.49 1.71 1.71 2.55 2.23 2.23 2.52 2.69 2.66
HCM2k98thQ: 16.5 57.2 0.0 7.6 98.1 98.0 5.5 18.2 18.2 6.4 0.2 1.6
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #20 Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 66.6 437 0.0 14.3 981 22.3 10.1 0.7 29.4 20.8 0.5 3.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 258.704 pounds
41.910 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 807.157 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 65.490 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 12.590 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 2.178 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 258.704 pounds
41.910 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 807.157 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 65.490 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 12.590 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 2.178 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-74
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #20: Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:86 3850***105
Lanes:0 1 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
42 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 31
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
3*** 0 Critical V/C:1.023 1 2
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):53.1 0
118 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):43.2 2 172***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:266***2400 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 236 1173 217 114 1565 58 32 13 110 516 49 166
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 236 1173 217 114 1565 58 32 13 110 516 49 166
Added Vol: 0 938 252 80 1688 0 0 0 0 150 0 29
App+Div: 30 289 -170 -89 597 28 10 -10 8 -494 -47 -164
Initial Fut: 266 2400 299 105 3850 86 42 3 118 172 2 31
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 266 2400 0 105 3850 86 42 3 118 172 2 31
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 266 2400 0 105 3850 86 42 3 118 172 2 31
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 266 2400 0 105 3850 86 42 3 118 172 2 31
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.79 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.85 0.79 0.79 1.00 0.76
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.93 0.07 1.00 0.02 0.98 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 2992 3800 1750 1663 5548 124 1663 37 1460 2992 1900 1453
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.63 0.00 0.06 0.69 0.69 0.03 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.00 0.02
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.3 82.7 0.0 8.3 80.7 80.7 7.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 1.03 0.92 0.00 0.92 1.03 1.03 0.43 0.97 0.97 0.99 0.01 0.26
Delay/Veh: 119.5 21.4 0.0 113.9 43.4 43.4 57.7 126 125.7 120.0 50.5 52.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 119.5 21.4 0.0 113.9 43.4 43.4 57.7 126 125.7 120.0 50.5 52.6
LOS by Move: F C+ A F D D E+ F F F D D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 37 0 7 59 59 2 8 8 7 0 1
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1
Lane Group: L T R L RT RT L RT RT L T R
#LnsInGrps: 2 2 1 1 3 3 1 1 1 2 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 8 4 0 6
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 0.85 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.83
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.79 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 0.85 0.79 0.79 1.00 0.76
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-75
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (Ped/Bike Sat Adj)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #20 Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
CrsswalkWid: 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 8.00
CrsswalkLen: 0.00 0.00 0.00 36.00 0.00 96.00 0.00 72.00
MinPedGrn: 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.24 0.00 27.20 0.00 21.25
PedGrn: 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.24 0.00 27.20 0.00 21.25
PedVolume: 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 6
PedFlowRate: 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 34
BikeVol: 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1
BikeFlwRate: 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 6
PedOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.017
BikeOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.031 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.022
PedAfterOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
rOcc: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.050 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.039
TurnVehAdj: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.950 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.977
Prt: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.022 0.000 0.975 0.000 1.000
Prta: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Plt: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Plta: 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
PedBike Adj: 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.999 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.977
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #20 Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 10.3 82.7 0.0 8.3 80.7 80.7 7.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 10.0
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 5.3 33.7 0.0 3.8 43.8 43.8 1.5 4.4 4.4 3.5 0.1 1.1
UpstreamVC: 0.88 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 0.10 0.35 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2: 1.7 3.1 0.0 3.2 15.6 15.6 0.7 3.8 3.8 3.5 0.0 0.3
HCM2KQueue: 7.1 36.8 0.0 7.0 59.5 59.4 2.2 8.2 8.2 7.0 0.1 1.4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.18 1.14 1.20 1.18 1.12 1.12 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.20 1.20
HCM2k70thQ: 8.4 41.9 0.0 8.2 66.7 66.7 2.6 9.6 9.6 8.2 0.1 1.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.54 1.39 1.60 1.54 1.34 1.34 1.58 1.53 1.53 1.54 1.60 1.59
HCM2k85thQ: 10.9 51.1 0.0 10.7 79.8 79.7 3.4 12.5 12.5 10.7 0.1 2.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.68 1.46 1.80 1.68 1.42 1.42 1.76 1.67 1.67 1.68 1.80 1.77
HCM2k90thQ: 11.9 53.9 0.0 11.7 84.5 84.4 3.8 13.6 13.6 11.7 0.1 2.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.90 1.58 2.10 1.91 1.52 1.52 2.03 1.88 1.88 1.91 2.10 2.06
HCM2k95thQ: 13.5 58.1 0.0 13.3 90.5 90.4 4.4 15.3 15.3 13.3 0.2 2.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.28 1.76 2.70 2.29 1.71 1.71 2.55 2.23 2.23 2.29 2.69 2.60
HCM2k98thQ: 16.2 64.7 0.0 15.9 102 101.6 5.5 18.2 18.2 15.9 0.2 3.6
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #20 Wolfe Road and Pruneridge Ave (CUP)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 66.7 506 0.0 26.1 1031 23.0 10.1 0.7 29.4 43.0 0.5 7.3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 304.146 pounds
49.272 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 948.937 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 77.963 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 15.302 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 2.474 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 304.146 pounds
49.272 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 948.937 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 77.963 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 15.302 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 2.474 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-76
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #21: Wolfe Road and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2402***0
Lanes:1 0 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):55
2 708
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.041 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):47.2 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):36.5 2 752***
LOS:D+
Lanes:0 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:0 1490 0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1003 440 0 1533 702 0 0 0 566 0 545
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1003 440 0 1533 702 0 0 0 566 0 545
Added Vol: 0 347 455 0 717 623 0 0 0 166 0 147
App+Div: 0 140 239 0 152 10 0 0 0 20 0 16
Initial Fut: 0 1490 1134 0 2402 1335 0 0 0 752 0 708
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1490 0 0 2402 0 0 0 0 752 0 708
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1490 0 0 2402 0 0 0 0 752 0 708
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1490 0 0 2402 0 0 0 0 752 0 708
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 1750 0 3800 1750 0 0 0 3150 0 3150
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.22
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 33.4 0.0 0.0 33.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.6 0.0 12.6
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.00 0.98
Delay/Veh: 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 41.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 65.9 0.0 49.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 41.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 65.9 0.0 49.6
LOS by Move: A A A A D A A A A E A D
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 7 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 16 0 13
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-77
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #21: Wolfe Road and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2418***0
Lanes:1 0 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):55
2 716
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.038 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):45.8 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):36.8 2 729***
LOS:D+
Lanes:0 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:0 1532 0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1003 440 0 1533 702 0 0 0 566 0 545
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1003 440 0 1533 702 0 0 0 566 0 545
Added Vol: 0 389 454 0 733 698 0 0 0 143 0 155
App+Div: 0 140 239 0 152 10 0 0 0 20 0 16
Initial Fut: 0 1532 1133 0 2418 1410 0 0 0 729 0 716
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1532 0 0 2418 0 0 0 0 729 0 716
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1532 0 0 2418 0 0 0 0 729 0 716
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1532 0 0 2418 0 0 0 0 729 0 716
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 1750 0 3800 1750 0 0 0 3150 0 3150
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.23
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 33.7 0.0 0.0 33.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.3 0.0 12.3
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.00 1.02
Delay/Veh: 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 39.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 65.4 0.0 60.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 7.6 0.0 0.0 39.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 65.4 0.0 60.2
LOS by Move: A A A A D A A A A E A E
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 8 0 0 26 0 0 0 0 15 0 14
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-78
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #21: Wolfe Road and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2529***0
Lanes:1 0 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):55
2 893***
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.135 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):83.0 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):55.8 2 721
LOS:E+
Lanes:0 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:0 1728 0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1003 440 0 1533 702 0 0 0 566 0 545
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1003 440 0 1533 702 0 0 0 566 0 545
Added Vol: 0 585 625 0 844 844 0 0 0 135 0 332
App+Div: 0 140 239 0 152 10 0 0 0 20 0 16
Initial Fut: 0 1728 1304 0 2529 1556 0 0 0 721 0 893
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1728 0 0 2529 0 0 0 0 721 0 893
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1728 0 0 2529 0 0 0 0 721 0 893
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1728 0 0 2529 0 0 0 0 721 0 893
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 1750 0 3800 1750 0 0 0 3150 0 3150
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.28
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 32.3 0.0 0.0 32.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.7 0.0 13.7
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.78 0.00 0.00 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.00 1.13
Delay/Veh: 0.0 10.4 0.0 0.0 78.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.4 0.0 96.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 10.4 0.0 0.0 78.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.4 0.0 96.6
LOS by Move: A B+ A A E-A A A A D+ A F
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 10 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 12 0 21
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-79
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #21: Wolfe Road and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2614***0
Lanes:1 0 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):55
2 961***
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.187 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):105.1 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):70.3 2 803
LOS:E
Lanes:0 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:0 1933 0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1003 440 0 1533 702 0 0 0 566 0 545
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1003 440 0 1533 702 0 0 0 566 0 545
Added Vol: 0 790 1101 0 929 909 0 0 0 217 0 400
App+Div: 0 140 239 0 152 10 0 0 0 20 0 16
Initial Fut: 0 1933 1780 0 2614 1621 0 0 0 803 0 961
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1933 0 0 2614 0 0 0 0 803 0 961
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1933 0 0 2614 0 0 0 0 803 0 961
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1933 0 0 2614 0 0 0 0 803 0 961
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 1750 0 3800 1750 0 0 0 3150 0 3150
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.31
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 31.9 0.0 0.0 31.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.1 0.0 14.1
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.00 1.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.00 1.19
Delay/Veh: 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.0 101 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.9 0.0 117.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.0 101 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.9 0.0 117.0
LOS by Move: A B A A F A A A A D A F
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 13 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 15 0 25
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-80
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #22: Wolfe Road and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2154 0
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
571 2
Cycle Time (sec):55
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.997 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):36.7 0
922*** 2 Avg Delay (sec/veh):24.7 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:0 2056***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1041 560 0 1524 703 330 0 292 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1041 560 0 1524 703 330 0 292 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 568 159 0 388 496 234 0 324 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 447 96 0 242 18 7 0 306 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 2056 815 0 2154 1217 571 0 922 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2056 0 0 2154 0 571 0 922 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2056 0 0 2154 0 571 0 922 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2056 0 0 2154 0 571 0 922 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 1750 0 5700 1750 3150 0 3150 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 29.9 0.0 0.0 29.9 0.0 16.1 0.0 16.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.62 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 31.6 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 18.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 31.6 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 18.0 0.0 48.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A C A A A A B-A D A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 27 0 0 8 0 6 0 17 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-81
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #22: Wolfe Road and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2125 0
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
617 2
Cycle Time (sec):55
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.979 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):32.2 0
879*** 2 Avg Delay (sec/veh):22.3 0 0
LOS:C+
Lanes:0 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:0 2051***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1041 560 0 1524 703 330 0 292 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1041 560 0 1524 703 330 0 292 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 563 147 0 359 517 280 0 281 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 447 96 0 242 18 7 0 306 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 2051 803 0 2125 1238 617 0 879 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2051 0 0 2125 0 617 0 879 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2051 0 0 2125 0 617 0 879 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2051 0 0 2125 0 617 0 879 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 1750 0 5700 1750 3150 0 3150 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 30.3 0.0 0.0 30.3 0.0 15.7 0.0 15.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.69 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 0.0 19.7 0.0 44.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 0.0 19.7 0.0 44.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A C A A A A B-A D A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 25 0 0 8 0 7 0 15 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-82
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #22: Wolfe Road and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2053 0
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
817*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):55
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.008 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):38.5 0
761 2 Avg Delay (sec/veh):27.8 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:0 2218***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1041 560 0 1524 703 330 0 292 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1041 560 0 1524 703 330 0 292 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 730 220 0 287 692 480 0 163 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 447 96 0 242 18 7 0 306 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 2218 876 0 2053 1413 817 0 761 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2218 0 0 2053 0 817 0 761 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2218 0 0 2053 0 817 0 761 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2218 0 0 2053 0 817 0 761 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 1750 0 5700 1750 3150 0 3150 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 31.8 0.0 0.0 31.8 0.0 14.2 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.00 1.01 0.00 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 32.7 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 54.0 0.0 38.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 32.7 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 54.0 0.0 38.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A C-A A A A D-A D+ A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 29 0 0 7 0 16 0 13 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-83
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #22: Wolfe Road and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2176 0
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
895*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):55
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.227 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):121.6 0
882 2 Avg Delay (sec/veh):85.7 0 0
LOS:F
Lanes:0 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:0 2821***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1041 560 0 1524 703 330 0 292 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1041 560 0 1524 703 330 0 292 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 1333 417 0 410 736 558 0 284 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 447 96 0 242 18 7 0 306 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 2821 1073 0 2176 1457 895 0 882 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2821 0 0 2176 0 895 0 882 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2821 0 0 2176 0 895 0 882 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2821 0 0 2176 0 895 0 882 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3800 1750 0 5700 1750 3150 0 3150 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 12.7 0.0 12.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.23 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.21 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 117 0.0 0.0 7.3 0.0 135.4 0.0 128.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 117 0.0 0.0 7.3 0.0 135.4 0.0 128.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A F A A A A F A F A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 59 0 0 7 0 25 0 24 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-84
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #23: Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1832 829***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
55*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 1075
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
15 1 Critical V/C:1.017 0 13***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):83.0 0
15 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):51.2 2 294
LOS:D-
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:42 1589***167
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Vallco Parkway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 42 930 74 219 1183 52 55 15 15 209 13 454
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 42 930 74 219 1183 52 55 15 15 209 13 454
Added Vol: 0 463 12 134 578 0 0 0 0 13 0 264
App+Div: 0 196 81 476 71 0 0 0 0 72 0 357
Initial Fut: 42 1589 167 829 1832 52 55 15 15 294 13 1075
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 42 1589 167 829 1832 0 55 15 15 294 13 1075
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 42 1589 167 829 1832 0 55 15 15 294 13 1075
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 42 1589 167 829 1832 0 55 15 15 294 13 1075
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.69 0.31 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.02 1.98
Final Sat.: 1750 5116 538 3150 5700 1750 1750 1900 1750 3150 42 3461
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.31 0.31 0.26 0.32 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.31 0.31
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.1 35.5 35.5 30.1 55.5 0.0 7.0 20.0 20.0 22.4 35.5 65.5
Volume/Cap: 0.29 1.05 1.05 1.05 0.70 0.00 0.54 0.05 0.05 0.50 1.05 0.57
Delay/Veh: 52.7 78.9 78.9 91.1 26.4 0.0 60.6 42.0 42.1 44.4 84.5 18.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 52.7 78.9 78.9 91.1 26.4 0.0 60.6 42.0 42.1 44.4 84.5 18.3
LOS by Move: D-E-E-F C A E D D D F B-
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 30 30 26 18 0 3 0 1 6 30 14
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-85
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #23: Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1754 834***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
55*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 1080
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
15 1 Critical V/C:1.011 0 13***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):80.8 0
15 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):50.1 2 295
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:42 1567***169
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Vallco Parkway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 42 930 74 219 1183 52 55 15 15 209 13 454
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 42 930 74 219 1183 52 55 15 15 209 13 454
Added Vol: 0 441 14 139 500 0 0 0 0 14 0 269
App+Div: 0 196 81 476 71 0 0 0 0 72 0 357
Initial Fut: 42 1567 169 834 1754 52 55 15 15 295 13 1080
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 42 1567 169 834 1754 0 55 15 15 295 13 1080
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 42 1567 169 834 1754 0 55 15 15 295 13 1080
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 42 1567 169 834 1754 0 55 15 15 295 13 1080
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.95 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.70 0.30 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.02 1.98
Final Sat.: 1750 5054 545 3150 5700 1750 1750 1900 1750 3150 43 3557
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.31 0.31 0.26 0.31 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.09 0.30 0.30
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.5 35.6 35.6 30.4 55.6 0.0 7.0 19.7 19.7 22.2 34.9 65.4
Volume/Cap: 0.27 1.04 1.04 1.04 0.66 0.00 0.54 0.05 0.05 0.51 1.04 0.56
Delay/Veh: 52.1 76.6 76.6 88.6 25.6 0.0 60.6 42.3 42.3 44.7 82.4 18.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 52.1 76.6 76.6 88.6 25.6 0.0 60.6 42.3 42.3 44.7 82.4 18.2
LOS by Move: D-E-E-F C A E D D D F B-
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 30 30 26 17 0 3 0 1 6 29 14
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-86
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #23: Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1426 838***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
55*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 1080
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
15 1 Critical V/C:0.950 0 13***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):64.4 0
15 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):42.6 2 475
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:42 1184***199
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Vallco Parkway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 42 930 74 219 1183 52 55 15 15 209 13 454
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 42 930 74 219 1183 52 55 15 15 209 13 454
Added Vol: 0 58 44 143 172 0 0 0 0 194 0 269
App+Div: 0 196 81 476 71 0 0 0 0 72 0 357
Initial Fut: 42 1184 199 838 1426 52 55 15 15 475 13 1080
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 42 1184 199 838 1426 0 55 15 15 475 13 1080
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 42 1184 199 838 1426 0 55 15 15 475 13 1080
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 42 1184 199 838 1426 0 55 15 15 475 13 1080
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.54 0.46 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.02 1.98
Final Sat.: 1750 4820 810 3150 5700 1750 1750 1900 1750 3150 42 3462
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.25 0.25 0.27 0.25 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.15 0.31 0.31
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 11.9 30.1 30.1 32.6 50.9 0.0 7.0 16.1 16.1 29.1 38.3 70.9
Volume/Cap: 0.24 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.59 0.00 0.54 0.06 0.06 0.62 0.98 0.53
Delay/Veh: 50.7 63.6 63.6 68.8 26.9 0.0 60.6 45.4 45.5 42.1 62.3 14.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 50.7 63.6 63.6 68.8 26.9 0.0 60.6 45.4 45.5 42.1 62.3 14.9
LOS by Move: D E E E C A E D D D E B
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 22 22 24 14 0 3 0 1 10 27 13
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-87
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #23: Wolfe Road and Vallco Parkway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1508 865***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
55*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 1097
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
15 1 Critical V/C:1.006 0 13***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):79.6 0
15 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):50.1 2 667
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:42 1344***243
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Road Vallco Parkway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 42 930 74 219 1183 52 55 15 15 209 13 454
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 42 930 74 219 1183 52 55 15 15 209 13 454
Added Vol: 0 218 88 170 254 0 0 0 0 386 0 286
App+Div: 0 196 81 476 71 0 0 0 0 72 0 357
Initial Fut: 42 1344 243 865 1508 52 55 15 15 667 13 1097
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 42 1344 243 865 1508 0 55 15 15 667 13 1097
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 42 1344 243 865 1508 0 55 15 15 667 13 1097
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 42 1344 243 865 1508 0 55 15 15 667 13 1097
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.51 0.49 2.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.02 1.98
Final Sat.: 1750 4765 861 3150 5700 1750 1750 1900 1750 3150 41 3462
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.28 0.28 0.27 0.26 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.21 0.32 0.32
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 11.6 32.6 32.6 31.8 52.7 0.0 7.0 12.3 12.3 31.3 36.6 68.4
Volume/Cap: 0.25 1.04 1.04 1.04 0.60 0.00 0.54 0.08 0.08 0.81 1.04 0.56
Delay/Veh: 50.9 77.2 77.2 85.5 26.0 0.0 60.6 48.9 48.9 47.7 79.5 16.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 50.9 77.2 77.2 85.5 26.0 0.0 60.6 48.9 48.9 47.7 79.5 16.6
LOS by Move: D E-E-F C A E D D D E-B
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 27 27 27 14 0 3 1 1 16 30 14
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-88
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #24: Stevens Creek Blvd and Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1022 511***
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
788*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 491
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1478 3 Critical V/C:1.058 2 1145***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):92.4 0
250 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):72.2 2 283
LOS:E
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:194 500***145
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 178 314 93 280 809 549 558 1071 237 195 685 158
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 178 314 93 280 809 549 558 1071 237 195 685 158
Added Vol: 1 147 6 204 181 206 139 186 1 29 215 189
App+Div: 15 39 46 27 32 88 91 221 12 59 245 144
Initial Fut: 194 500 145 511 1022 843 788 1478 250 283 1145 491
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 194 500 145 511 1022 0 788 1478 250 283 1145 491
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 194 500 145 511 1022 0 788 1478 250 283 1145 491
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 194 500 145 511 1022 0 788 1478 250 283 1145 491
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.28 0.72 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.05 0.95
Final Sat.: 1750 4335 1257 1750 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3889 1668
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.29 0.27 0.00 0.25 0.26 0.14 0.09 0.29 0.29
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 13.5 13.1 13.1 33.1 32.7 0.0 28.4 45.9 45.9 15.9 33.4 33.4
Volume/Cap: 0.99 1.06 1.06 1.06 0.99 0.00 1.06 0.68 0.37 0.68 1.06 1.06
Delay/Veh: 113.1 106 106.1 100.5 67.9 0.0 95.1 31.8 27.1 54.1 83.1 83.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 113.1 106 106.1 100.5 67.9 0.0 95.1 31.8 27.1 54.1 83.1 83.1
LOS by Move: F F F F E A F C C D-F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 12 13 13 29 25 0 22 14 7 6 25 25
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-89
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #24: Stevens Creek Blvd and Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1010 466***
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
769*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 442
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1489 3 Critical V/C:1.019 2 1131***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):80.7 0
250 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):65.6 2 285
LOS:E
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:195 548***157
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 178 314 93 280 809 549 558 1071 237 195 685 158
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 178 314 93 280 809 549 558 1071 237 195 685 158
Added Vol: 2 195 18 159 169 187 120 197 1 31 201 140
App+Div: 15 39 46 27 32 88 91 221 12 59 245 144
Initial Fut: 195 548 157 466 1010 824 769 1489 250 285 1131 442
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 195 548 157 466 1010 0 769 1489 250 285 1131 442
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 195 548 157 466 1010 0 769 1489 250 285 1131 442
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 195 548 157 466 1010 0 769 1489 250 285 1131 442
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.31 0.69 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.13 0.87
Final Sat.: 1750 4351 1247 1750 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 4024 1573
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.24 0.26 0.14 0.09 0.28 0.28
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 13.6 14.8 14.8 31.3 32.5 0.0 28.7 45.9 45.9 15.9 33.1 33.1
Volume/Cap: 0.98 1.02 1.02 1.02 0.98 0.00 1.02 0.68 0.37 0.68 1.02 1.02
Delay/Veh: 111.0 91.8 91.8 91.4 66.7 0.0 83.3 31.9 27.0 54.2 71.3 71.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 111.0 91.8 91.8 91.4 66.7 0.0 83.3 31.9 27.0 54.2 71.3 71.3
LOS by Move: F F F F E A F C C D-E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 12 14 14 25 24 0 20 15 7 6 23 23
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-90
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #24: Stevens Creek Blvd and Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1114***78
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
658*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 83
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1613 3 Critical V/C:0.939 2 1231***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):60.2 0
250 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):49.8 2 287
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:195***646 158
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 178 314 93 280 809 549 558 1071 237 195 685 158
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 178 314 93 280 809 549 558 1071 237 195 685 158
Added Vol: 2 293 19 -229 273 208 9 321 1 33 301 -219
App+Div: 15 39 46 27 32 88 91 221 12 59 245 144
Initial Fut: 195 646 158 78 1114 845 658 1613 250 287 1231 83
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 195 646 158 78 1114 0 658 1613 250 287 1231 83
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 195 646 158 78 1114 0 658 1613 250 287 1231 83
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 195 646 158 78 1114 0 658 1613 250 287 1231 83
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.37 0.63 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.80 0.20
Final Sat.: 1750 4504 1102 1750 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 5311 358
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.29 0.00 0.21 0.28 0.14 0.09 0.23 0.23
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 14.2 36.7 36.7 14.9 37.5 0.0 26.7 42.6 42.6 13.7 29.6 29.6
Volume/Cap: 0.94 0.47 0.47 0.36 0.94 0.00 0.94 0.80 0.40 0.80 0.94 0.94
Delay/Veh: 97.9 33.9 33.9 49.1 54.2 0.0 66.3 37.1 29.6 63.6 56.7 56.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 97.9 33.9 33.9 49.1 54.2 0.0 66.3 37.1 29.6 63.6 56.7 56.7
LOS by Move: F C-C-D D-A E D+ C E E+ E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 8 8 3 24 0 16 18 7 6 17 17
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-91
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #24: Stevens Creek Blvd and Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1161***91
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
731*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 93
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1641 3 Critical V/C:0.986 2 1253***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):70.0 0
251 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):54.6 2 288
LOS:D-
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:196***767 164
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 178 314 93 280 809 549 558 1071 237 195 685 158
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 178 314 93 280 809 549 558 1071 237 195 685 158
Added Vol: 3 414 25 -216 320 422 82 349 2 34 323 -209
App+Div: 15 39 46 27 32 88 91 221 12 59 245 144
Initial Fut: 196 767 164 91 1161 1059 731 1641 251 288 1253 93
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 196 767 164 91 1161 0 731 1641 251 288 1253 93
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 196 767 164 91 1161 0 731 1641 251 288 1253 93
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 196 767 164 91 1161 0 731 1641 251 288 1253 93
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.43 0.57 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.78 0.22
Final Sat.: 1750 4626 989 1750 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 5275 392
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.17 0.17 0.05 0.31 0.00 0.23 0.29 0.14 0.09 0.24 0.24
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 13.6 37.6 37.6 13.2 37.2 0.0 28.3 43.4 43.4 13.8 28.9 28.9
Volume/Cap: 0.99 0.53 0.53 0.47 0.99 0.00 0.99 0.80 0.40 0.80 0.99 0.99
Delay/Veh: 112.6 34.2 34.2 51.9 63.9 0.0 75.0 36.6 29.0 63.4 66.2 66.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 112.6 34.2 34.2 51.9 63.9 0.0 75.0 36.6 29.0 63.4 66.2 66.2
LOS by Move: F C-C-D-E A E-D+ C E E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 12 10 10 4 27 0 18 18 7 6 18 18
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-92
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #25: Miller Ave and Bollinger Road (SJ)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:164 608***310
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
121 1
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 109
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
793*** 1 Critical V/C:0.910 1 612
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):50.4 0
121 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):44.2 1 131***
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:121***365 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Miller Av Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 121 244 106 285 466 128 95 793 121 131 611 85
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 121 244 106 285 466 128 95 793 121 131 611 85
Added Vol: 0 70 0 18 89 9 3 0 0 0 1 17
App+Div: 0 51 0 7 53 27 23 0 0 0 0 7
Initial Fut: 121 365 106 310 608 164 121 793 121 131 612 109
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 121 365 0 310 608 164 121 793 121 131 612 109
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 121 365 0 310 608 164 121 793 121 131 612 109
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 121 365 0 310 608 164 121 793 121 131 612 109
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.77 0.23 1.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 1.68 0.32
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 3150 1470 396 1750 3260 497 1750 3184 567
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.41 0.41 0.07 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.19 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 7.6 26.7 0.0 26.3 45.5 45.5 9.3 26.7 26.7 8.2 25.6 25.6
Volume/Cap: 0.91 0.36 0.00 0.37 0.91 0.91 0.74 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.75 0.75
Delay/Veh: 97.5 29.9 0.0 30.4 39.1 39.1 60.7 47.5 47.5 94.6 37.6 37.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 97.5 29.9 0.0 30.4 39.1 39.1 60.7 47.5 47.5 94.6 37.6 37.6
LOS by Move: F C A C D D E D D F D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 5 0 5 27 27 6 18 18 7 12 12
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-93
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #25: Miller Ave and Bollinger Road (SJ)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:164 605***312
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
121 1
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 107
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
793*** 1 Critical V/C:0.930 1 612
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):53.9 0
121 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):46.3 1 131***
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:121***352 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Miller Av Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 121 244 106 285 466 128 95 793 121 131 611 85
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 121 244 106 285 466 128 95 793 121 131 611 85
Added Vol: 0 57 0 20 86 9 3 0 0 0 1 15
App+Div: 0 51 0 7 53 27 23 0 0 0 0 7
Initial Fut: 121 352 106 312 605 164 121 793 121 131 612 107
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 121 352 0 312 605 164 121 793 121 131 612 107
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 121 352 0 312 605 164 121 793 121 131 612 107
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 121 352 0 312 605 164 121 793 121 131 612 107
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.79 0.21 1.00 1.73 0.27 1.00 1.69 0.31
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 3150 1416 384 1750 3210 490 1750 3149 551
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.09 0.00 0.10 0.43 0.43 0.07 0.25 0.25 0.07 0.19 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 7.4 26.8 0.0 26.6 45.9 45.9 9.2 26.6 26.6 8.1 25.5 25.5
Volume/Cap: 0.93 0.35 0.00 0.37 0.93 0.93 0.75 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.76 0.76
Delay/Veh: 103.6 29.7 0.0 30.2 42.2 42.2 62.5 50.5 50.5 100.6 38.2 38.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 103.6 29.7 0.0 30.2 42.2 42.2 62.5 50.5 50.5 100.6 38.2 38.2
LOS by Move: F C A C D D E D D F D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 4 0 5 28 28 6 18 18 8 12 12
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-94
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #25: Miller Ave and Bollinger Road (SJ)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:163 643***312
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
119 1
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 109
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
793*** 1 Critical V/C:0.930 1 612
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):53.6 0
121 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):46.1 1 131***
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:121***381 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Miller Av Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 121 244 106 285 466 128 95 793 121 131 611 85
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 121 244 106 285 466 128 95 793 121 131 611 85
Added Vol: 0 86 0 20 124 8 1 0 0 0 1 17
App+Div: 0 51 0 7 53 27 23 0 0 0 0 7
Initial Fut: 121 381 106 312 643 163 119 793 121 131 612 109
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 121 381 0 312 643 163 119 793 121 131 612 109
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 121 381 0 312 643 163 119 793 121 131 612 109
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 121 381 0 312 643 163 119 793 121 131 612 109
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.78 0.22 1.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 1.68 0.32
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 3150 1490 378 1750 3260 497 1750 3184 567
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.43 0.43 0.07 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.19 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 7.4 27.1 0.0 26.7 46.4 46.4 9.1 26.1 26.1 8.0 25.1 25.1
Volume/Cap: 0.93 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.93 0.93 0.75 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.77 0.77
Delay/Veh: 103.8 29.8 0.0 30.1 41.6 41.6 61.6 50.8 50.8 100.8 38.6 38.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 103.8 29.8 0.0 30.1 41.6 41.6 61.6 50.8 50.8 100.8 38.6 38.6
LOS by Move: F C A C D D E D D F D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 5 0 5 28 28 6 18 18 8 12 12
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-95
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #25: Miller Ave and Bollinger Road (SJ)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:167 682***323
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
121 1
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 114
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
793*** 1 Critical V/C:0.956 1 612
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):58.5 0
121 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):49.3 1 131***
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:121***391 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Miller Av Bollinger Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 121 244 106 285 466 128 95 793 121 131 611 85
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 121 244 106 285 466 128 95 793 121 131 611 85
Added Vol: 0 96 0 31 163 12 3 0 0 0 1 22
App+Div: 0 51 0 7 53 27 23 0 0 0 0 7
Initial Fut: 121 391 106 323 682 167 121 793 121 131 612 114
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 121 391 0 323 682 167 121 793 121 131 612 114
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 121 391 0 323 682 167 121 793 121 131 612 114
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 121 391 0 323 682 167 121 793 121 131 612 114
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.79 0.21 1.00 1.72 0.28 1.00 1.66 0.34
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 3150 1501 368 1750 3260 497 1750 3161 589
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.10 0.00 0.10 0.45 0.45 0.07 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.19 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 7.2 27.4 0.0 27.3 47.5 47.5 8.8 25.4 25.4 7.8 24.4 24.4
Volume/Cap: 0.96 0.38 0.00 0.38 0.96 0.96 0.78 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.79 0.79
Delay/Veh: 112.5 29.6 0.0 29.7 45.6 45.6 67.1 56.1 56.1 109.3 40.2 40.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 112.5 29.6 0.0 29.7 45.6 45.6 67.1 56.1 56.1 109.3 40.2 40.2
LOS by Move: F C A C D D E E+ E+ F D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 7 5 0 5 31 31 6 19 19 8 13 13
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-96
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #26: Stevens Creek Blvd and Finch Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:263***1 261
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
184 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 206
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1541*** 2 Critical V/C:0.833 2 1441
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):45.6 0
238 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):41.8 1 184***
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:313***1 125
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Finch Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 152 0 64 32 0 40 26 1155 89 110 945 6
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 152 0 64 32 0 40 26 1155 89 110 945 6
Added Vol: 158 1 61 3 1 0 0 250 146 71 274 3
App+Div: 3 0 0 226 0 223 158 136 3 3 222 197
Initial Fut: 313 1 125 261 1 263 184 1541 238 184 1441 206
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 313 1 125 261 1 263 184 1541 238 184 1441 206
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 313 1 125 261 1 263 184 1541 238 184 1441 206
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 313 1 125 261 1 263 184 1541 238 184 1441 206
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.01 0.99 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 2.57 0.43 1.00 2.60 0.40
Final Sat.: 1750 14 1737 3488 13 1750 1750 4881 754 1750 4934 705
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.15 0.11 0.32 0.32 0.11 0.29 0.29
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 25.8 25.8 25.8 21.6 21.6 21.6 16.0 45.5 45.5 15.1 44.6 44.6
Volume/Cap: 0.83 0.34 0.34 0.41 0.41 0.83 0.79 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.79 0.79
Delay/Veh: 56.0 40.0 40.0 43.8 43.8 56.8 66.4 36.8 36.8 74.1 35.5 35.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 56.0 40.0 40.0 43.8 43.8 56.8 66.4 36.8 36.8 74.1 35.5 35.5
LOS by Move: E+ D D D D E+ E D+ D+ E D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 14 4 4 5 5 13 7 20 20 7 18 18
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-97
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #26: Stevens Creek Blvd and Finch Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:263***1 261
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
184 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 206
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1568*** 2 Critical V/C:0.778 2 1433
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):41.3 0
189 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):38.6 1 166***
LOS:D+
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:261***1 105
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Finch Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 152 0 64 32 0 40 26 1155 89 110 945 6
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 152 0 64 32 0 40 26 1155 89 110 945 6
Added Vol: 106 1 41 3 1 0 0 277 97 53 266 3
App+Div: 3 0 0 226 0 223 158 136 3 3 222 197
Initial Fut: 261 1 105 261 1 263 184 1568 189 166 1433 206
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 261 1 105 261 1 263 184 1568 189 166 1433 206
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 261 1 105 261 1 263 184 1568 189 166 1433 206
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 261 1 105 261 1 263 184 1568 189 166 1433 206
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 0.01 0.99 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 2.67 0.33 1.00 2.61 0.39
Final Sat.: 1800 17 1783 3520 13 1800 1750 4997 602 1750 4895 704
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.15 0.11 0.31 0.31 0.09 0.29 0.29
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 22.4 22.4 22.4 22.6 22.6 22.6 16.7 48.4 48.4 14.6 46.4 46.4
Volume/Cap: 0.78 0.32 0.32 0.39 0.39 0.78 0.76 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.76 0.76
Delay/Veh: 54.4 42.3 42.3 42.9 42.9 52.1 62.5 32.9 32.9 67.5 33.5 33.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 54.4 42.3 42.3 42.9 42.9 52.1 62.5 32.9 32.9 67.5 33.5 33.5
LOS by Move: D-D D D D D-E C-C-E C-C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 4 4 5 5 12 7 19 19 6 17 17
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-98
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #26: Stevens Creek Blvd and Finch Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:263 9 570***
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
184*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 262
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1305 2 Critical V/C:0.748 2 1176***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):43.1 0
189 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):41.0 1 166
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:261***2 105
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Finch Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 152 0 64 32 0 40 26 1155 89 110 945 6
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 152 0 64 32 0 40 26 1155 89 110 945 6
Added Vol: 106 2 41 312 9 0 0 14 97 53 9 59
App+Div: 3 0 0 226 0 223 158 136 3 3 222 197
Initial Fut: 261 2 105 570 9 263 184 1305 189 166 1176 262
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 261 2 105 570 9 263 184 1305 189 166 1176 262
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 261 2 105 570 9 263 184 1305 189 166 1176 262
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 261 2 105 570 9 263 184 1305 189 166 1176 262
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.02 0.98 2.00 0.03 0.97 1.00 2.59 0.41 1.00 2.42 0.58
Final Sat.: 1750 33 1720 3500 58 1697 1750 4926 713 1750 4590 1023
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.06 0.06 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.11 0.26 0.26 0.09 0.26 0.26
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.9 23.9 23.9 26.1 26.1 26.1 16.9 42.7 42.7 15.3 41.1 41.1
Volume/Cap: 0.75 0.31 0.31 0.75 0.71 0.71 0.75 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.75 0.75
Delay/Veh: 51.5 41.1 41.1 46.7 45.5 45.5 61.5 35.4 35.4 63.3 36.5 36.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 51.5 41.1 41.1 46.7 45.5 45.5 61.5 35.4 35.4 63.3 36.5 36.5
LOS by Move: D-D D D D D E D+ D+ E D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 4 4 12 11 11 7 16 16 6 16 16
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-99
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #26: Stevens Creek Blvd and Finch Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:263 18 880***
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
184*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 319
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1352 2 Critical V/C:0.865 2 1209***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):49.1 0
189 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):46.6 1 166
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:261***4 105
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Finch Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 152 0 64 32 0 40 26 1155 89 110 945 6
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 152 0 64 32 0 40 26 1155 89 110 945 6
Added Vol: 106 4 41 622 18 0 0 61 97 53 42 116
App+Div: 3 0 0 226 0 223 158 136 3 3 222 197
Initial Fut: 261 4 105 880 18 263 184 1352 189 166 1209 319
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 261 4 105 880 18 263 184 1352 189 166 1209 319
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 261 4 105 880 18 263 184 1352 189 166 1209 319
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 261 4 105 880 18 263 184 1352 189 166 1209 319
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.03 0.97 2.00 0.06 0.94 1.00 2.60 0.40 1.00 2.33 0.67
Final Sat.: 1750 64 1691 3500 113 1646 1750 4949 692 1750 4431 1169
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.06 0.06 0.25 0.16 0.16 0.11 0.27 0.27 0.09 0.27 0.27
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 20.7 20.7 20.7 34.9 34.9 34.9 14.6 38.9 38.9 13.5 37.9 37.9
Volume/Cap: 0.87 0.36 0.36 0.87 0.55 0.55 0.87 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.87 0.87
Delay/Veh: 64.9 44.0 44.0 46.5 36.2 36.2 80.6 41.4 41.4 78.7 43.4 43.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 64.9 44.0 44.0 46.5 36.2 36.2 80.6 41.4 41.4 78.7 43.4 43.4
LOS by Move: E D D D D+ D+ F D D E-D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 13 4 4 19 10 10 7 18 18 7 18 18
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-100
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #27: Homestead Road and Tantau Avenue/Quail Av ((CUP/SUN)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:81 138***46
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
63*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 23
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1070 2 Critical V/C:0.851 1 1117***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):49.5 0
224 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):43.6 1 58
LOS:D
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol:382***125 212
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue/Quail Ave Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 98 80 173 41 107 75 50 805 118 133 904 18
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 98 80 173 41 107 75 50 805 118 133 904 18
Added Vol: 144 25 41 0 9 2 9 110 75 15 56 1
App+Div: 140 20 -2 5 22 4 4 155 31 -90 157 4
Initial Fut: 382 125 212 46 138 81 63 1070 224 58 1117 23
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 382 125 212 46 138 81 63 1070 224 58 1117 23
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 382 125 212 46 138 81 63 1070 224 58 1117 23
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 382 125 212 46 138 81 63 1070 224 58 1117 23
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.77 0.23 1.00 0.18 0.50 0.32 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.96 0.04
Final Sat.: 1345 440 1750 317 950 558 1750 3800 1750 1750 3717 77
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.28 0.28 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.28 0.13 0.03 0.30 0.30
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 39.3 39.3 39.3 20.1 20.1 20.1 7.0 40.3 79.6 8.3 41.6 41.6
Volume/Cap: 0.87 0.87 0.37 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.62 0.84 0.19 0.48 0.87 0.87
Delay/Veh: 50.9 50.9 31.3 70.7 70.7 70.7 66.1 42.0 7.9 56.7 43.0 43.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 50.9 50.9 31.3 70.7 70.7 70.7 66.1 42.0 7.9 56.7 43.0 43.0
LOS by Move: D D C E E E E D A E+ D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 20 20 6 13 13 13 4 20 3 3 22 22
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-101
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #27: Homestead Road and Tantau Avenue/Quail Av ((CUP/SUN)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:81***139 46
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
62*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 23
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1085 2 Critical V/C:0.866 1 1128***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):51.2 0
224 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):44.5 1 58
LOS:D
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol:379 126***213
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue/Quail Ave Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 98 80 173 41 107 75 50 805 118 133 904 18
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 98 80 173 41 107 75 50 805 118 133 904 18
Added Vol: 141 26 42 0 10 2 8 125 75 15 67 1
App+Div: 140 20 -2 5 22 4 4 155 31 -90 157 4
Initial Fut: 379 126 213 46 139 81 62 1085 224 58 1128 23
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 379 126 213 46 139 81 62 1085 224 58 1128 23
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 379 126 213 46 139 81 62 1085 224 58 1128 23
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 379 126 213 46 139 81 62 1085 224 58 1128 23
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.97 0.95
Lanes: 0.75 0.25 1.00 0.17 0.53 0.30 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.96 0.04
Final Sat.: 1351 449 1750 303 914 533 1750 3800 1750 1750 3626 74
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.28 0.28 0.12 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.29 0.13 0.03 0.31 0.31
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 38.1 38.1 38.1 20.6 20.6 20.6 7.0 40.9 79.0 8.4 42.3 42.3
Volume/Cap: 0.88 0.88 0.38 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.61 0.84 0.19 0.48 0.88 0.88
Delay/Veh: 53.9 53.9 32.3 73.5 73.5 73.5 65.3 41.5 8.1 56.6 44.0 44.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 53.9 53.9 32.3 73.5 73.5 73.5 65.3 41.5 8.1 56.6 44.0 44.0
LOS by Move: D-D-C-E E E E D A E+ D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 20 20 6 13 13 13 3 21 3 3 24 24
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-102
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #27: Homestead Road and Tantau Avenue/Quail Av ((CUP/SUN)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:81 135 46***
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
62*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 24
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1149 2 Critical V/C:0.903 1 1199***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):55.9 0
233 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):48.1 1 63
LOS:D
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol:397***160 236
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue/Quail Ave Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 98 80 173 41 107 75 50 805 118 133 904 18
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 98 80 173 41 107 75 50 805 118 133 904 18
Added Vol: 159 60 65 0 6 2 8 189 84 20 138 2
App+Div: 140 20 -2 5 22 4 4 155 31 -90 157 4
Initial Fut: 397 160 236 46 135 81 62 1149 233 63 1199 24
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 397 160 236 46 135 81 62 1149 233 63 1199 24
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 397 160 236 46 135 81 62 1149 233 63 1199 24
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 397 160 236 46 135 81 62 1149 233 63 1199 24
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.73 0.27 1.00 0.18 0.50 0.32 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.96 0.04
Final Sat.: 1276 514 1750 320 940 564 1750 3800 1750 1750 3719 74
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.31 0.31 0.13 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.30 0.13 0.04 0.32 0.32
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 40.4 40.4 40.4 18.7 18.7 18.7 7.0 41.0 81.4 7.9 41.9 41.9
Volume/Cap: 0.92 0.92 0.40 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.61 0.89 0.20 0.55 0.92 0.92
Delay/Veh: 58.2 58.2 30.9 83.8 83.8 83.8 65.3 44.9 7.2 59.7 48.4 48.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 58.2 58.2 30.9 83.8 83.8 83.8 65.3 44.9 7.2 59.7 48.4 48.4
LOS by Move: E+ E+ C F F F E D A E+ D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 23 23 7 14 14 14 3 23 3 3 26 26
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-103
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #27: Homestead Road and Tantau Avenue/Quail Av ((CUP/SUN)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:82 146 46***
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
62*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 24
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1167 2 Critical V/C:0.958 1 1224***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):68.0 0
234 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):56.7 1 69
LOS:E+
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Final Vol:414 211***262
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue/Quail Ave Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 98 80 173 41 107 75 50 805 118 133 904 18
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 98 80 173 41 107 75 50 805 118 133 904 18
Added Vol: 176 111 91 0 17 3 8 207 85 26 163 2
App+Div: 140 20 -2 5 22 4 4 155 31 -90 157 4
Initial Fut: 414 211 262 46 146 82 62 1167 234 69 1224 24
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 414 211 262 46 146 82 62 1167 234 69 1224 24
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 414 211 262 46 146 82 62 1167 234 69 1224 24
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 414 211 262 46 146 82 62 1167 234 69 1224 24
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.68 0.32 1.00 0.18 0.51 0.31 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.96 0.04
Final Sat.: 1191 607 1750 307 973 547 1750 3800 1750 1750 3721 73
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.35 0.35 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.04 0.31 0.13 0.04 0.33 0.33
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 42.5 42.5 42.5 18.3 18.3 18.3 7.0 39.7 82.1 7.5 40.2 40.2
Volume/Cap: 0.98 0.98 0.42 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.61 0.93 0.20 0.63 0.98 0.98
Delay/Veh: 69.4 69.4 29.9 99.4 99.4 99.4 65.3 50.9 7.0 65.9 60.5 60.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 69.4 69.4 29.9 99.4 99.4 99.4 65.3 50.9 7.0 65.9 60.5 60.5
LOS by Move: E E C F F F E D A E E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 28 28 8 15 15 15 3 25 3 4 29 29
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-104
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #28: Tantau Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 459 174***
Lanes:0 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):60
1 158
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.721 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):21.8 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):16.6 1 186***
LOS:B
Lanes:0 0 1 0 1
Final Vol:0 517 650***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 41 172 193 162 304 156 47 263 74 82 126 57
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 41 172 193 162 304 156 47 263 74 82 126 57
Added Vol: 0 215 273 6 170 0 0 0 0 40 0 20
App+Div: -41 130 184 6 -15 -156 -47 -263 -74 64 -126 81
Initial Fut: 0 517 650 174 459 0 0 0 0 186 0 158
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 517 650 174 459 0 0 0 0 186 0 158
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 517 650 174 459 0 0 0 0 186 0 158
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 517 650 174 459 0 0 0 0 186 0 158
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 1900 1750 1750 1900 0 0 1900 0 1750 0 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.27 0.37 0.10 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.09
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 30.9 30.9 8.3 26.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.8 0.0 11.1
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.53 0.72 0.72 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.49
Delay/Veh: 0.0 10.2 14.1 35.0 13.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.7 0.0 22.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 10.2 14.1 35.0 13.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.7 0.0 22.5
LOS by Move: A B+ B C-B A A A A C A C+
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 6 9 4 6 0 0 0 0 5 0 3
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-105
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #28: Tantau Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 460 173***
Lanes:0 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):60
1 158
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.717 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):21.6 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):16.6 1 186***
LOS:B
Lanes:0 0 1 0 1
Final Vol:0 515 650***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 41 172 193 162 304 156 47 263 74 82 126 57
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 41 172 193 162 304 156 47 263 74 82 126 57
Added Vol: 0 213 273 5 171 0 0 0 0 40 0 20
App+Div: -41 130 184 6 -15 -156 -47 -263 -74 64 -126 81
Initial Fut: 0 515 650 173 460 0 0 0 0 186 0 158
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 515 650 173 460 0 0 0 0 186 0 158
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 515 650 173 460 0 0 0 0 186 0 158
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 515 650 173 460 0 0 0 0 186 0 158
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.95
Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 1800 1750 1750 1800 0 0 1750 0 1800 0 1800
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.29 0.37 0.10 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.09
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 31.1 31.1 8.3 27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.6 0.0 11.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.55 0.72 0.72 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.48
Delay/Veh: 0.0 10.5 13.9 34.6 13.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.7 0.0 22.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 10.5 13.9 34.6 13.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.7 0.0 22.5
LOS by Move: A B+ B C-B A A A A C A C+
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 6 9 4 7 0 0 0 0 5 0 3
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-106
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #28: Tantau Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 460 182***
Lanes:0 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):60
1 166
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.731 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):22.2 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):16.8 1 179***
LOS:B
Lanes:0 0 1 0 1
Final Vol:0 582 662***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 41 172 193 162 304 156 47 263 74 82 126 57
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 41 172 193 162 304 156 47 263 74 82 126 57
Added Vol: 0 280 285 14 171 0 0 0 0 33 0 28
App+Div: -41 130 184 6 -15 -156 -47 -263 -74 64 -126 81
Initial Fut: 0 582 662 182 460 0 0 0 0 179 0 166
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 582 662 182 460 0 0 0 0 179 0 166
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 582 662 182 460 0 0 0 0 179 0 166
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 582 662 182 460 0 0 0 0 179 0 166
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 1900 1750 1750 1900 0 0 1900 0 1750 0 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.31 0.38 0.10 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.09
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 31.1 31.1 8.5 26.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.4 0.0 10.8
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.59 0.73 0.73 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.53
Delay/Veh: 0.0 11.0 14.3 35.1 12.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.5 0.0 23.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 11.0 14.3 35.1 12.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.5 0.0 23.1
LOS by Move: A B+ B D+ B A A A A C A C
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 7 9 4 6 0 0 0 0 5 0 4
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-107
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #28: Tantau Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 478 183***
Lanes:0 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):60
1 167
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.753 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):23.1 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):17.4 1 184***
LOS:B
Lanes:0 0 1 0 1
Final Vol:0 674 687***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Pruneridge Avenue
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 41 172 193 162 304 156 47 263 74 82 126 57
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 41 172 193 162 304 156 47 263 74 82 126 57
Added Vol: 0 372 310 15 189 0 0 0 0 38 0 29
App+Div: -41 130 184 6 -15 -156 -47 -263 -74 64 -126 81
Initial Fut: 0 674 687 183 478 0 0 0 0 184 0 167
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 674 687 183 478 0 0 0 0 184 0 167
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 674 687 183 478 0 0 0 0 184 0 167
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 674 687 183 478 0 0 0 0 184 0 167
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 0 1900 1750 1750 1900 0 0 1900 0 1750 0 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.35 0.39 0.10 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 31.3 31.3 8.3 27.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.4 0.0 10.8
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.68 0.75 0.75 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.53
Delay/Veh: 0.0 12.6 14.9 37.3 12.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.6 0.0 23.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 12.6 14.9 37.3 12.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.6 0.0 23.1
LOS by Move: A B B D+ B A A A A C A C
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 8 10 4 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 4
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-108
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #31: Tantau Avenue and Vallco Parkway/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:474 833***1
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
364 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 2
1
Loss Time (sec):12
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.707 1!26***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):35.4 0
313*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):34.6 0 12
LOS:C-
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:142***399 1
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Vallco Parkway/Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 49 181 1 1 485 190 178 0 148 12 26 2
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 49 181 1 1 485 190 178 0 148 12 26 2
Added Vol: 15 213 0 0 339 227 99 0 19 0 0 0
App+Div: 78 5 0 0 9 57 87 0 146 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 142 399 1 1 833 474 364 0 313 12 26 2
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 142 399 1 1 833 474 364 0 313 12 26 2
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 142 399 1 1 833 474 364 0 313 12 26 2
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 142 399 1 1 833 474 364 0 313 12 26 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.24 0.76 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.32 0.63 0.05
Final Sat.: 1750 3790 9 1750 2349 1337 3500 0 1750 553 1199 92
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.10 0.00 0.18 0.02 0.02 0.02
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 12.9 44.7 44.7 24.8 56.5 56.5 28.5 0.0 28.5 10.0 10.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.75 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.44 0.00 0.75 0.26 0.26 0.26
Delay/Veh: 67.6 26.5 26.5 37.8 27.9 27.9 39.3 0.0 50.0 52.4 52.4 52.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 67.6 26.5 26.5 37.8 27.9 27.9 39.3 0.0 50.0 52.4 52.4 52.4
LOS by Move: E C C D+ C C D A D D-D-D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 5 5 0 19 19 6 0 13 2 2 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-109
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #31: Tantau Avenue and Vallco Parkway/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:475 834***1
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
364 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 2
1
Loss Time (sec):12
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.711 1!26
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):35.7 0
315*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):34.7 0 12***
LOS:C-
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:145***398 1
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Vallco Parkway/Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 49 181 1 1 485 190 178 0 148 12 26 2
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 49 181 1 1 485 190 178 0 148 12 26 2
Added Vol: 18 212 0 0 340 228 99 0 21 0 0 0
App+Div: 78 5 0 0 9 57 87 0 146 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 145 398 1 1 834 475 364 0 315 12 26 2
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 145 398 1 1 834 475 364 0 315 12 26 2
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 145 398 1 1 834 475 364 0 315 12 26 2
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 145 398 1 1 834 475 364 0 315 12 26 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.97 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.93 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.25 0.75 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.30 0.65 0.05
Final Sat.: 1750 3691 9 1750 2356 1342 3550 0 1750 525 1138 88
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.10 0.00 0.18 0.02 0.02 0.02
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 13.2 45.0 45.0 24.4 56.2 56.2 28.6 0.0 28.6 10.0 10.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.76 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.43 0.00 0.76 0.27 0.27 0.27
Delay/Veh: 67.5 26.4 26.4 38.1 28.2 28.2 39.1 0.0 50.1 52.6 52.6 52.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 67.5 26.4 26.4 38.1 28.2 28.2 39.1 0.0 50.1 52.6 52.6 52.6
LOS by Move: E C C D+ C C D A D D-D-D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 5 5 0 19 19 6 0 13 2 2 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-110
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #31: Tantau Avenue and Vallco Parkway/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:488 813***1
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
459 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 2
1
Loss Time (sec):12
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.716 1!26***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):36.4 0
325*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):35.7 0 12
LOS:D+
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:147***380 1
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Vallco Parkway/Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 49 181 1 1 485 190 178 0 148 12 26 2
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 49 181 1 1 485 190 178 0 148 12 26 2
Added Vol: 20 194 0 0 319 241 194 0 31 0 0 0
App+Div: 78 5 0 0 9 57 87 0 146 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 147 380 1 1 813 488 459 0 325 12 26 2
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 147 380 1 1 813 488 459 0 325 12 26 2
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 147 380 1 1 813 488 459 0 325 12 26 2
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 147 380 1 1 813 488 459 0 325 12 26 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.21 0.79 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.32 0.63 0.05
Final Sat.: 1750 3789 10 1750 2301 1381 3500 0 1750 553 1199 92
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.13 0.00 0.19 0.02 0.02 0.02
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 13.2 43.5 43.5 25.3 55.6 55.6 29.2 0.0 29.2 10.0 10.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.76 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.54 0.00 0.76 0.26 0.26 0.26
Delay/Veh: 68.2 27.2 27.2 37.4 28.8 28.8 40.2 0.0 50.1 52.4 52.4 52.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 68.2 27.2 27.2 37.4 28.8 28.8 40.2 0.0 50.1 52.4 52.4 52.4
LOS by Move: E C C D+ C C D A D D-D-D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 5 5 0 19 19 8 0 14 2 2 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-111
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #31: Tantau Avenue and Vallco Parkway/Driveway (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:511 814***1
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
569 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 2
1
Loss Time (sec):12
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.741 1!26***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):38.2 0
343*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):37.5 0 12
LOS:D+
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:156***388 1
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Vallco Parkway/Driveway
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 49 181 1 1 485 190 178 0 148 12 26 2
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 49 181 1 1 485 190 178 0 148 12 26 2
Added Vol: 29 202 0 0 320 264 304 0 49 0 0 0
App+Div: 78 5 0 0 9 57 87 0 146 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 156 388 1 1 814 511 569 0 343 12 26 2
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 156 388 1 1 814 511 569 0 343 12 26 2
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 156 388 1 1 814 511 569 0 343 12 26 2
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 156 388 1 1 814 511 569 0 343 12 26 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.19 0.81 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.32 0.63 0.05
Final Sat.: 1750 3789 10 1750 2260 1419 3500 0 1750 553 1199 92
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.16 0.00 0.20 0.02 0.02 0.02
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 13.5 43.5 43.5 24.8 54.7 54.7 29.8 0.0 29.8 10.0 10.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.79 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.79 0.79 0.66 0.00 0.79 0.26 0.26 0.26
Delay/Veh: 70.9 27.3 27.3 37.8 30.4 30.4 42.3 0.0 51.7 52.4 52.4 52.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 70.9 27.3 27.3 37.8 30.4 30.4 42.3 0.0 51.7 52.4 52.4 52.4
LOS by Move: E C C D+ C C D A D-D-D-D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 5 5 0 20 20 11 0 15 2 2 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-112
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #32: Stevens Creek Blvd and Tantau Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:332 0 851***
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
211 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1817*** 2 Critical V/C:0.977 3 1363
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):64.8 0
96 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):56.8 1 201***
LOS:E+
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Final Vol:102 81***99
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 69
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 69
Added Vol: 2 8 32 290 0 69 43 270 2 43 278 177
App+Div: 17 6 1 144 0 35 73 256 35 0 336 36
Initial Fut: 102 81 99 851 0 332 211 1817 96 201 1363 282
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 102 81 99 851 0 332 211 1817 96 201 1363 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 102 81 99 851 0 332 211 1817 96 201 1363 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 102 81 99 851 0 332 211 1817 96 201 1363 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.37 0.27 0.36 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.84 0.16 1.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 648 514 629 3150 0 1750 1750 5391 285 1750 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.27 0.00 0.19 0.12 0.34 0.34 0.11 0.24 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.3 19.3 19.3 33.2 0.0 33.2 18.6 41.4 41.4 14.1 36.9 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.00 0.69 0.78 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.78 0.00
Delay/Veh: 96.7 96.7 96.7 68.0 0.0 42.9 62.0 54.1 54.1 108.8 40.1 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 96.7 96.7 96.7 68.0 0.0 42.9 62.0 54.1 54.1 108.8 40.1 0.0
LOS by Move: F F F E A D E D-D-F D A
HCM2kAvgQ: 16 16 16 21 0 11 8 25 25 12 17 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-113
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #32: Stevens Creek Blvd and Tantau Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:332 0 853***
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
210 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1824*** 2 Critical V/C:0.980 3 1337
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):65.3 0
95 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):57.0 1 195***
LOS:E+
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Final Vol:101 81***93
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 69
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 69
Added Vol: 1 8 26 292 0 69 42 277 1 37 252 179
App+Div: 17 6 1 144 0 35 73 256 35 0 336 36
Initial Fut: 101 81 93 853 0 332 210 1824 95 195 1337 284
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 101 81 93 853 0 332 210 1824 95 195 1337 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 101 81 93 853 0 332 210 1824 95 195 1337 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 101 81 93 853 0 332 210 1824 95 195 1337 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.37 0.29 0.34 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.85 0.15 1.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 643 515 592 3150 0 1750 1750 5322 277 1750 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.27 0.00 0.19 0.12 0.34 0.34 0.11 0.23 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.2 19.2 19.2 33.2 0.0 33.2 18.8 42.0 42.0 13.6 36.8 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.00 0.69 0.77 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.77 0.00
Delay/Veh: 98.2 98.2 98.2 68.7 0.0 42.9 60.6 54.4 54.4 110.9 39.8 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 98.2 98.2 98.2 68.7 0.0 42.9 60.6 54.4 54.4 110.9 39.8 0.0
LOS by Move: F F F E A D E D-D-F D A
HCM2kAvgQ: 16 16 16 21 0 11 8 26 26 12 16 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-114
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #32: Stevens Creek Blvd and Tantau Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:311 0 863***
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
192 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1898*** 2 Critical V/C:1.019 3 1171
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):75.8 0
86 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):64.0 1 227***
LOS:E
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Final Vol:86***81 126
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 69
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 69
Added Vol: -14 8 59 302 0 48 24 351 -8 69 86 182
App+Div: 17 6 1 144 0 35 73 256 35 0 336 36
Initial Fut: 86 81 126 863 0 311 192 1898 86 227 1171 287
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 86 81 126 863 0 311 192 1898 86 227 1171 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 86 81 126 863 0 311 192 1898 86 227 1171 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 86 81 126 863 0 311 192 1898 86 227 1171 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.30 0.26 0.44 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.86 0.14 1.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 525 495 769 3150 0 1750 1750 5433 246 1750 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.27 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.35 0.35 0.13 0.21 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.3 19.3 19.3 32.3 0.0 32.3 19.6 41.2 41.2 15.3 36.8 0.0
Volume/Cap: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 0.00 0.66 0.67 1.02 1.02 1.02 0.67 0.00
Delay/Veh: 108.3 108 108.3 79.6 0.0 42.5 53.2 64.6 64.6 117.6 37.3 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 108.3 108 108.3 79.6 0.0 42.5 53.2 64.6 64.6 117.6 37.3 0.0
LOS by Move: F F F E-A D D-E E F D+ A
HCM2kAvgQ: 17 17 17 22 0 11 7 28 28 14 13 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-115
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #32: Stevens Creek Blvd and Tantau Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:312 0 881***
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
199 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
2236*** 2 Critical V/C:1.113 3 1254
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):106.5 0
98 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):85.3 1 231***
LOS:F
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Final Vol:93 81 145***
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 69
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 69
Added Vol: -7 8 78 320 0 49 31 689 4 73 169 191
App+Div: 17 6 1 144 0 35 73 256 35 0 336 36
Initial Fut: 93 81 145 881 0 312 199 2236 98 231 1254 296
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 93 81 145 881 0 312 199 2236 98 231 1254 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 93 81 145 881 0 312 199 2236 98 231 1254 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 93 81 145 881 0 312 199 2236 98 231 1254 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.30 0.24 0.46 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.86 0.14 1.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 521 453 812 3150 0 1750 1750 5441 238 1750 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.28 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.41 0.41 0.13 0.22 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.3 19.3 19.3 30.2 0.0 30.2 20.0 44.3 44.3 14.2 38.6 0.0
Volume/Cap: 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 0.00 0.71 0.68 1.11 1.11 1.11 0.68 0.00
Delay/Veh: 137.2 137 137.2 112.4 0.0 46.2 53.6 95.9 95.9 148.8 36.5 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 137.2 137 137.2 112.4 0.0 46.2 53.6 95.9 95.9 148.8 36.5 0.0
LOS by Move: F F F F A D D-F F F D+ A
HCM2kAvgQ: 20 20 20 26 0 11 7 38 38 16 14 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-116
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #34: Lawrence Expressway and Homestead Road (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:403 2963***289
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
443 2
Cycle Time (sec):190
1 206
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
754*** 2 Critical V/C:0.951 2 566
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):61.1 0
327 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):58.0 2 385***
LOS:E+
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:158***1408 454
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 14 85 10 14 107 10 14 10 10 14 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 132 1713 400 240 3399 374 381 605 262 353 459 179
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 132 1713 400 240 3399 374 381 605 262 353 459 179
Added Vol: 13 30 10 0 8 11 32 74 52 2 39 0
App+Div: 13 86 44 49 207 18 30 75 13 30 68 27
Initial Fut: 158 1829 454 289 3614 403 443 754 327 385 566 206
User Adj: 1.00 0.77 1.00 1.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 158 1408 454 289 2963 403 443 754 327 385 566 206
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 158 1408 454 289 2963 403 443 754 327 385 566 206
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 158 1408 454 289 2963 403 443 754 327 385 566 206
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.25 0.26 0.09 0.52 0.23 0.14 0.20 0.19 0.12 0.15 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 14.0 100 122.1 20.6 107 134.7 27.7 35.3 49.3 21.7 29.3 49.9
Volume/Cap: 0.68 0.47 0.40 0.85 0.92 0.32 0.97 1.07 0.72 1.07 0.97 0.45
Delay/Veh: 93.8 28.2 16.6 100.7 29.9 2.4 113.7 131 69.7 151.0 108 59.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 93.8 28.2 16.6 100.7 29.9 2.4 113.7 131 69.7 151.0 108 59.2
LOS by Move: F C B F C A F F E F F E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 16 13 12 49 2 19 28 21 19 20 12
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-117
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #34: Lawrence Expressway and Homestead Road (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:403 2963***289
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
443 2
Cycle Time (sec):190
1 206
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
768*** 2 Critical V/C:0.955 2 576
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):62.5 0
328 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):59.0 2 385***
LOS:E+
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:158***1408 454
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 14 85 10 14 107 10 14 10 10 14 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 132 1713 400 240 3399 374 381 605 262 353 459 179
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 132 1713 400 240 3399 374 381 605 262 353 459 179
Added Vol: 13 30 10 0 8 11 32 88 53 2 49 0
App+Div: 13 86 44 49 207 18 30 75 13 30 68 27
Initial Fut: 158 1829 454 289 3614 403 443 768 328 385 576 206
User Adj: 1.00 0.77 1.00 1.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 158 1408 454 289 2963 403 443 768 328 385 576 206
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 158 1408 454 289 2963 403 443 768 328 385 576 206
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 158 1408 454 289 2963 403 443 768 328 385 576 206
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.25 0.26 0.09 0.52 0.23 0.14 0.20 0.19 0.12 0.15 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 14.0 100 121.9 20.6 107 134.4 27.4 35.5 49.5 21.5 29.6 50.2
Volume/Cap: 0.68 0.47 0.40 0.85 0.92 0.33 0.97 1.08 0.72 1.08 0.97 0.45
Delay/Veh: 93.8 28.2 16.7 100.7 29.9 2.5 116.3 135 69.4 155.3 110 59.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 93.8 28.2 16.7 100.7 29.9 2.5 116.3 135 69.4 155.3 110 59.0
LOS by Move: F C B F C A F F E F F E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 16 13 12 49 2 19 29 21 19 21 12
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-118
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #34: Lawrence Expressway and Homestead Road (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:401 2964***289
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
448 2
Cycle Time (sec):190
1 206
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
834*** 2 Critical V/C:0.975 2 629
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):68.7 0
348 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):64.4 2 379***
LOS:E
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:168***1412 451
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 14 85 10 14 107 10 14 10 10 14 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 132 1713 400 240 3399 374 381 605 262 353 459 179
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 132 1713 400 240 3399 374 381 605 262 353 459 179
Added Vol: 23 35 7 0 9 9 37 154 73 -4 102 0
App+Div: 13 86 44 49 207 18 30 75 13 30 68 27
Initial Fut: 168 1834 451 289 3615 401 448 834 348 379 629 206
User Adj: 1.00 0.77 1.00 1.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 168 1412 451 289 2964 401 448 834 348 379 629 206
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 168 1412 451 289 2964 401 448 834 348 379 629 206
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 168 1412 451 289 2964 401 448 834 348 379 629 206
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.25 0.26 0.09 0.52 0.23 0.14 0.22 0.20 0.12 0.17 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 14.0 100 120.6 20.6 107 133.3 26.3 36.8 50.8 20.2 30.7 51.2
Volume/Cap: 0.72 0.47 0.41 0.85 0.92 0.33 1.03 1.13 0.74 1.13 1.03 0.44
Delay/Veh: 96.8 28.2 17.3 100.7 29.9 2.9 131.6 153 70.0 175.0 123 58.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 96.8 28.2 17.3 100.7 29.9 2.9 131.6 153 70.0 175.0 123 58.1
LOS by Move: F C B F C A F F E F F E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 16 13 12 49 3 21 33 22 19 23 12
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-119
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #34: Lawrence Expressway and Homestead Road (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:404 2965***289
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
456 2
Cycle Time (sec):190
1 206
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
859*** 2 Critical V/C:0.983 2 645
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):71.8 0
356 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):66.9 2 380***
LOS:E
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:171***1416 455
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 14 85 10 14 107 10 14 10 10 14 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 132 1713 400 240 3399 374 381 605 262 353 459 179
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 132 1713 400 240 3399 374 381 605 262 353 459 179
Added Vol: 26 40 11 0 10 12 45 179 81 -3 118 0
App+Div: 13 86 44 49 207 18 30 75 13 30 68 27
Initial Fut: 171 1839 455 289 3616 404 456 859 356 380 645 206
User Adj: 1.00 0.77 1.00 1.00 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 171 1416 455 289 2965 404 456 859 356 380 645 206
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 171 1416 455 289 2965 404 456 859 356 380 645 206
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 171 1416 455 289 2965 404 456 859 356 380 645 206
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.25 0.26 0.09 0.52 0.23 0.14 0.23 0.20 0.12 0.17 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 14.0 100 120.2 20.6 107 133.2 26.2 37.2 51.2 19.8 30.8 51.4
Volume/Cap: 0.74 0.47 0.41 0.85 0.92 0.33 1.05 1.16 0.76 1.16 1.05 0.44
Delay/Veh: 97.9 28.2 17.6 100.7 30.0 2.9 138.3 161 70.5 183.9 129 58.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 97.9 28.2 17.6 100.7 30.0 2.9 138.3 161 70.5 183.9 129 58.0
LOS by Move: F C B F C A F F E F F E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 16 14 12 50 3 21 34 23 20 24 12
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-120
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #36: Stevens Creek Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:40 450 452***
Lanes:0 1 0 1 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1580 3 Critical V/C:1.270 3 1922
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):169.2 0
1236*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):84.9 2 751***
LOS:F
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:24***0 33
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 39 23 0 0 224 367 287 498 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 183 209 0 390 0
Initial Fut: 24 0 33 452 450 40 0 1580 1236 751 1922 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 24 0 33 452 450 40 0 1580 1236 751 1922 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 24 0 33 452 450 40 0 1580 1236 751 1922 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 24 0 33 452 450 40 0 1580 1236 751 1922 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.50 1.37 0.13 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 2618 2606 232 0 5700 1750 3150 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.28 0.71 0.24 0.34 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 28.3 13.2 13.2 13.2 0.0 46.5 56.5 18.3 64.8 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.00 0.07 1.30 1.30 1.30 0.00 0.60 1.25 1.30 0.52 0.00
Delay/Veh: 41.4 0.0 26.3 190.3 190 190.3 0.0 20.2 142.9 190.1 9.5 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.4 0.0 26.3 190.3 190 190.3 0.0 20.2 142.9 190.1 9.5 0.0
LOS by Move: D A C F F F A C+ F F A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 1 22 22 22 0 12 75 27 10 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-121
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #36: Stevens Creek Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:40 450***452
Lanes:0 1 0 1 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1592 3 Critical V/C:1.268 3 1892
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):168.7 0
1228*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):84.9 2 751***
LOS:F
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:24***0 33
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 39 23 0 0 236 359 287 468 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 183 209 0 390 0
Initial Fut: 24 0 33 452 450 40 0 1592 1228 751 1892 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 24 0 33 452 450 40 0 1592 1228 751 1892 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 24 0 33 452 450 40 0 1592 1228 751 1892 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 24 0 33 452 450 40 0 1592 1228 751 1892 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.45 1.42 0.13 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 2567 2555 227 0 5700 1750 3150 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.28 0.70 0.24 0.33 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 28.3 13.5 13.5 13.5 0.0 46.2 56.2 18.3 64.5 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.00 0.07 1.30 1.30 1.30 0.00 0.60 1.25 1.30 0.51 0.00
Delay/Veh: 41.4 0.0 26.3 189.5 190 189.5 0.0 20.5 142.5 189.5 9.6 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.4 0.0 26.3 189.5 190 189.5 0.0 20.5 142.5 189.5 9.6 0.0
LOS by Move: D A C F F F A C+ F F A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 1 22 22 22 0 12 75 27 10 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-122
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #36: Stevens Creek Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:40***459 453
Lanes:0 1 0 1 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1741 3 Critical V/C:1.246 3 1760
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):159.2 0
1197*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):80.6 2 751***
LOS:F
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:24***0 33
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 40 32 0 0 385 328 287 336 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 183 209 0 390 0
Initial Fut: 24 0 33 453 459 40 0 1741 1197 751 1760 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 24 0 33 453 459 40 0 1741 1197 751 1760 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 24 0 33 453 459 40 0 1741 1197 751 1760 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 24 0 33 453 459 40 0 1741 1197 751 1760 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.49 1.38 0.13 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 2597 2631 229 0 5700 1750 3150 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.31 0.68 0.24 0.31 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 28.7 13.6 13.6 13.6 0.0 45.7 55.7 18.7 64.4 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.00 0.07 1.28 1.28 1.28 0.00 0.67 1.23 1.28 0.48 0.00
Delay/Veh: 41.4 0.0 26.0 178.5 179 178.5 0.0 21.9 133.9 178.6 9.3 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.4 0.0 26.0 178.5 179 178.5 0.0 21.9 133.9 178.6 9.3 0.0
LOS by Move: D A C F F F A C+ F F A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 1 22 22 22 0 15 71 26 9 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-123
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #36: Stevens Creek Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:40 460***454
Lanes:0 1 0 1 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1835 3 Critical V/C:1.429 3 1857
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):239.6 0
1478*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):118.3 2 751***
LOS:F
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:24***0 33
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 41 33 0 0 479 609 287 433 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 183 209 0 390 0
Initial Fut: 24 0 33 454 460 40 0 1835 1478 751 1857 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 24 0 33 454 460 40 0 1835 1478 751 1857 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 24 0 33 454 460 40 0 1835 1478 751 1857 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 24 0 33 454 460 40 0 1835 1478 751 1857 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.48 1.39 0.13 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 2597 2632 229 0 5700 1750 3150 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.32 0.84 0.24 0.33 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 26.1 11.8 11.8 11.8 0.0 50.2 60.2 16.1 66.2 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.00 0.07 1.48 1.48 1.48 0.00 0.64 1.40 1.48 0.49 0.00
Delay/Veh: 41.4 0.0 27.9 270.3 270 270.3 0.0 18.8 207.4 270.3 8.6 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.4 0.0 27.9 270.3 270 270.3 0.0 18.8 207.4 270.3 8.6 0.0
LOS by Move: D A C F F F A B-F F A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 1 25 25 25 0 14 106 32 9 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-124
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #38: Stevens Creek Blvd/Agilent Drwy (SJ)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Final Vol:795***0 235
Lanes:1 0 1!0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
144*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):130
0 83
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
1970 2 Critical V/C:0.780 3 2853***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):33.3 0
1 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.8 1 28
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:33 0 8
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Agilent Drwy Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 33 0 8 175 0 219 93 1649 1 27 2102 21
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 33 0 8 175 0 219 93 1649 1 27 2102 21
Added Vol: 0 0 0 60 0 576 51 212 0 0 420 62
App+Div: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 0 1 331 0
Initial Fut: 33 0 8 235 0 795 144 1970 1 28 2853 83
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 33 0 8 235 0 795 144 1970 1 28 2853 83
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 33 0 8 235 0 795 144 1970 1 28 2853 83
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 33 0 8 235 0 795 144 1970 1 28 2853 83
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.23 0.00 1.77 1.00 2.99 0.01 1.00 3.88 0.12
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 2149 0 3101 1750 5697 3 1750 7367 214
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.26 0.08 0.35 0.35 0.02 0.39 0.39
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 42.7 0.0 42.7 42.7 0.0 42.7 13.7 67.7 67.7 10.5 64.5 64.5
Volume/Cap: 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.33 0.00 0.78 0.78 0.66 0.66 0.20 0.78 0.78
Delay/Veh: 29.9 0.0 29.4 32.9 0.0 42.4 75.6 23.4 23.4 56.5 28.0 28.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 29.9 0.0 29.4 32.9 0.0 42.4 75.6 23.4 23.4 56.5 28.0 28.0
LOS by Move: C A C C-A D E-C C E+ C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 0 6 0 19 6 19 19 1 23 23
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-125
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #38: Stevens Creek Blvd/Agilent Drwy (SJ)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Final Vol:795***0 235
Lanes:1 0 1!0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
144*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):130
0 83
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
1982 2 Critical V/C:0.773 3 2823***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):32.9 0
1 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.5 1 28
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:33 0 8
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Agilent Drwy Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 33 0 8 175 0 219 93 1649 1 27 2102 21
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 33 0 8 175 0 219 93 1649 1 27 2102 21
Added Vol: 0 0 0 60 0 576 51 224 0 0 390 62
App+Div: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 0 1 331 0
Initial Fut: 33 0 8 235 0 795 144 1982 1 28 2823 83
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 33 0 8 235 0 795 144 1982 1 28 2823 83
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 33 0 8 235 0 795 144 1982 1 28 2823 83
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 33 0 8 235 0 795 144 1982 1 28 2823 83
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.23 0.00 1.77 1.00 2.99 0.01 1.00 3.88 0.12
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1800 2158 0 3180 1750 5597 3 1750 7285 214
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.25 0.08 0.35 0.35 0.02 0.39 0.39
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 42.0 0.0 42.0 42.0 0.0 42.0 13.8 68.6 68.6 10.4 65.1 65.1
Volume/Cap: 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.34 0.00 0.77 0.77 0.67 0.67 0.20 0.77 0.77
Delay/Veh: 30.4 0.0 29.9 33.5 0.0 42.6 74.6 23.1 23.1 56.6 27.5 27.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 30.4 0.0 29.9 33.5 0.0 42.6 74.6 23.1 23.1 56.6 27.5 27.5
LOS by Move: C A C C-A D E C C E+ C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 0 6 0 18 6 19 19 1 23 23
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-126
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #38: Stevens Creek Blvd/Agilent Drwy (SJ)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Final Vol:795***0 235
Lanes:1 0 1!0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
144*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):130
0 83
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
2132 2 Critical V/C:0.759 3 2702***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):33.2 0
1 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):30.1 1 28
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:33 0 8
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Agilent Drwy Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 33 0 8 175 0 219 93 1649 1 27 2102 21
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 33 0 8 175 0 219 93 1649 1 27 2102 21
Added Vol: 0 0 0 60 0 576 51 374 0 0 269 62
App+Div: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 0 1 331 0
Initial Fut: 33 0 8 235 0 795 144 2132 1 28 2702 83
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 33 0 8 235 0 795 144 2132 1 28 2702 83
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 33 0 8 235 0 795 144 2132 1 28 2702 83
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 33 0 8 235 0 795 144 2132 1 28 2702 83
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.23 0.00 1.77 1.00 2.99 0.01 1.00 3.87 0.13
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 2149 0 3101 1750 5697 3 1750 7355 226
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.26 0.08 0.37 0.37 0.02 0.37 0.37
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 43.9 0.0 43.9 43.9 0.0 43.9 14.1 67.4 67.4 9.7 63.0 63.0
Volume/Cap: 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.32 0.00 0.76 0.76 0.72 0.72 0.21 0.76 0.76
Delay/Veh: 29.1 0.0 28.6 32.0 0.0 40.8 72.4 25.0 25.0 57.4 28.3 28.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 29.1 0.0 28.6 32.0 0.0 40.8 72.4 25.0 25.0 57.4 28.3 28.3
LOS by Move: C A C C-A D E C C E+ C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 0 6 0 18 6 21 21 1 22 22
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-127
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #38: Stevens Creek Blvd/Agilent Drwy (SJ)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Final Vol:795***0 235
Lanes:1 0 1!0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
144*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):130
0 83
0
Loss Time (sec):9
1
2226 2 Critical V/C:0.772 3 2800***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):33.2 0
1 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):30.1 1 28
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:33 0 8
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Agilent Drwy Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 33 0 8 175 0 219 93 1649 1 27 2102 21
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 33 0 8 175 0 219 93 1649 1 27 2102 21
Added Vol: 0 0 0 60 0 576 51 468 0 0 367 62
App+Div: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 0 1 331 0
Initial Fut: 33 0 8 235 0 795 144 2226 1 28 2800 83
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 33 0 8 235 0 795 144 2226 1 28 2800 83
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 33 0 8 235 0 795 144 2226 1 28 2800 83
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 33 0 8 235 0 795 144 2226 1 28 2800 83
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.23 0.00 1.77 1.00 2.99 0.01 1.00 3.88 0.12
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 2149 0 3101 1750 5697 3 1750 7363 218
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.26 0.08 0.39 0.39 0.02 0.38 0.38
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 43.2 0.0 43.2 43.2 0.0 43.2 13.8 68.4 68.4 9.4 64.0 64.0
Volume/Cap: 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.33 0.00 0.77 0.77 0.74 0.74 0.22 0.77 0.77
Delay/Veh: 29.6 0.0 29.2 32.6 0.0 41.9 74.4 25.0 25.0 57.7 28.1 28.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 29.6 0.0 29.2 32.6 0.0 41.9 74.4 25.0 25.0 57.7 28.1 28.1
LOS by Move: C A C C-A D E C C E+ C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 0 6 0 19 6 23 23 1 22 22
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-128
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #39: Stevens Creek Blvd and Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:792***0 309
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Signal=Permit Signal=Permit
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):6
0
2149 5 Critical V/C:0.863 3 2093***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):34.3 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.9 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 10 0 0 10 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 288 0 650 0 1688 0 0 1406 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 288 0 650 0 1688 0 0 1406 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 273 0 0 476 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 21 0 136 0 188 0 0 211 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 309 0 792 0 2149 0 0 2093 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 309 0 792 0 2149 0 0 2093 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 309 0 792 0 2149 0 0 2093 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 309 0 792 0 2149 0 0 2093 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1750 0 1750 0 9500 0 0 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 62.9 0.0 62.9 0.0 51.1 0.0 0.0 51.1 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.86 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 33.3 0.0 25.7 0.0 0.0 34.7 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 33.3 0.0 25.7 0.0 0.0 34.7 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A B A C-A C A A C-A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 7 0 30 0 11 0 0 24 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-129
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #39: Stevens Creek Blvd and Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:792***0 309
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Signal=Permit Signal=Permit
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):6
0
2161 5 Critical V/C:0.857 3 2063***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):34.1 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.8 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 10 0 0 10 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 288 0 650 0 1688 0 0 1406 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 288 0 650 0 1688 0 0 1406 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 285 0 0 446 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 21 0 136 0 188 0 0 211 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 309 0 792 0 2161 0 0 2063 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 309 0 792 0 2161 0 0 2063 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 309 0 792 0 2161 0 0 2063 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 309 0 792 0 2161 0 0 2063 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1750 0 1750 0 9500 0 0 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.3 0.0 63.3 0.0 50.7 0.0 0.0 50.7 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.86 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.5 0.0 32.5 0.0 26.1 0.0 0.0 34.7 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.5 0.0 32.5 0.0 26.1 0.0 0.0 34.7 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A B A C-A C A A C-A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 7 0 29 0 11 0 0 23 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-130
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #39: Stevens Creek Blvd and Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:787***0 310
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Signal=Permit Signal=Permit
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):6
0
2311 5 Critical V/C:0.833 3 1946***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):33.0 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.8 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 10 0 0 10 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 288 0 650 0 1688 0 0 1406 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 288 0 650 0 1688 0 0 1406 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 435 0 0 329 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 21 0 136 0 188 0 0 211 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 310 0 787 0 2311 0 0 1946 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 310 0 787 0 2311 0 0 1946 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 310 0 787 0 2311 0 0 1946 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 310 0 787 0 2311 0 0 1946 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1750 0 1750 0 9500 0 0 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 64.8 0.0 64.8 0.0 49.2 0.0 0.0 49.2 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.83 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.83 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0 29.5 0.0 27.9 0.0 0.0 34.4 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0 29.5 0.0 27.9 0.0 0.0 34.4 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A B A C A C A A C-A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 7 0 28 0 13 0 0 21 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-131
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #39: Stevens Creek Blvd and Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:787***0 310
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Signal=Permit Signal=Permit
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):6
0
2405 5 Critical V/C:0.851 3 2045***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):33.7 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.9 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 10 0 0 10 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 288 0 650 0 1688 0 0 1406 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 288 0 650 0 1688 0 0 1406 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 529 0 0 428 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 21 0 136 0 188 0 0 211 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 310 0 787 0 2405 0 0 2045 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 310 0 787 0 2405 0 0 2045 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 310 0 787 0 2405 0 0 2045 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 310 0 787 0 2405 0 0 2045 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1750 0 1750 0 9500 0 0 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.4 0.0 63.4 0.0 50.6 0.0 0.0 50.6 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.85 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.4 0.0 31.9 0.0 27.1 0.0 0.0 34.4 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.4 0.0 31.9 0.0 27.1 0.0 0.0 34.4 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A B A C A C A A C-A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 7 0 29 0 13 0 0 23 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-132
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #40: Stevens Creek Blvd and NB Lawrence Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:0 0 0
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
459*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 247
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1848 3 Critical V/C:0.678 3 1173***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):34.6 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):30.1 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:2 1 0 1 0
Final Vol:889 677 321***
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: NB Lawrence Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 420 646 321 0 0 0 325 1499 0 0 897 242
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 420 646 321 0 0 0 325 1499 0 0 897 242
Added Vol: 283 19 0 0 0 0 34 239 0 0 193 0
App+Div: 186 12 0 0 0 0 100 110 0 0 83 5
Initial Fut: 889 677 321 0 0 0 459 1848 0 0 1173 247
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 889 677 321 0 0 0 459 1848 0 0 1173 247
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 889 677 321 0 0 0 459 1848 0 0 1173 247
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 889 677 321 0 0 0 459 1848 0 0 1173 247
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.05 1.29 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3220 2452 1163 0 0 0 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.14
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 48.8 48.8 48.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.8 62.2 0.0 0.0 36.4 36.4
Volume/Cap: 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.68 0.47
Delay/Veh: 29.8 29.8 29.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.1 21.0 0.0 0.0 37.8 34.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 29.8 29.8 29.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.1 21.0 0.0 0.0 37.8 34.6
LOS by Move: C C C A A A D C+ A A D+ C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 16 16 16 0 0 0 9 16 0 0 13 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-133
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #40: Stevens Creek Blvd and NB Lawrence Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:0 0 0
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
459*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 247
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1860 3 Critical V/C:0.673 3 1151***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):34.5 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):30.1 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:2 1 0 1 0
Final Vol:881***677 321
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: NB Lawrence Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 420 646 321 0 0 0 325 1499 0 0 897 242
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 420 646 321 0 0 0 325 1499 0 0 897 242
Added Vol: 275 19 0 0 0 0 34 251 0 0 171 0
App+Div: 186 12 0 0 0 0 100 110 0 0 83 5
Initial Fut: 881 677 321 0 0 0 459 1860 0 0 1151 247
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 881 677 321 0 0 0 459 1860 0 0 1151 247
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 881 677 321 0 0 0 459 1860 0 0 1151 247
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 881 677 321 0 0 0 459 1860 0 0 1151 247
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.04 1.31 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3207 2464 1168 0 0 0 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.14
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 49.0 49.0 49.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.0 62.0 0.0 0.0 36.0 36.0
Volume/Cap: 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.47
Delay/Veh: 29.6 29.6 29.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.8 21.3 0.0 0.0 37.9 34.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 29.6 29.6 29.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.8 21.3 0.0 0.0 37.9 34.9
LOS by Move: C C C A A A D C+ A A D+ C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 16 16 16 0 0 0 9 16 0 0 13 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-134
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #40: Stevens Creek Blvd and NB Lawrence Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:0 0 0
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
454*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 247
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
2015 3 Critical V/C:0.686 3 1256***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):35.2 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.7 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:2 1 0 1 0
Final Vol:659 679 321***
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: NB Lawrence Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 420 646 321 0 0 0 325 1499 0 0 897 242
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 420 646 321 0 0 0 325 1499 0 0 897 242
Added Vol: 53 21 0 0 0 0 29 406 0 0 276 0
App+Div: 186 12 0 0 0 0 100 110 0 0 83 5
Initial Fut: 659 679 321 0 0 0 454 2015 0 0 1256 247
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 659 679 321 0 0 0 454 2015 0 0 1256 247
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 659 679 321 0 0 0 454 2015 0 0 1256 247
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 659 679 321 0 0 0 454 2015 0 0 1256 247
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 1.32 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 2511 1187 0 0 0 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.21 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.14
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 47.3 47.3 47.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 63.7 0.0 0.0 38.5 38.5
Volume/Cap: 0.53 0.69 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.44
Delay/Veh: 28.0 31.0 31.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.8 21.0 0.0 0.0 36.6 32.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 28.0 31.0 31.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.8 21.0 0.0 0.0 36.6 32.8
LOS by Move: C C C A A A D C+ A A D+ C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 16 16 0 0 0 9 17 0 0 14 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-135
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #40: Stevens Creek Blvd and NB Lawrence Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:0 0 0
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
454*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 247
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
2110 3 Critical V/C:0.694 3 1297***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):35.3 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.8 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:2 1 0 1 0
Final Vol:717 680***321
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: NB Lawrence Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 420 646 321 0 0 0 325 1499 0 0 897 242
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 420 646 321 0 0 0 325 1499 0 0 897 242
Added Vol: 111 22 0 0 0 0 29 501 0 0 317 0
App+Div: 186 12 0 0 0 0 100 110 0 0 83 5
Initial Fut: 717 680 321 0 0 0 454 2110 0 0 1297 247
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 717 680 321 0 0 0 454 2110 0 0 1297 247
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 717 680 321 0 0 0 454 2110 0 0 1297 247
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 717 680 321 0 0 0 454 2110 0 0 1297 247
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 1.32 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 2512 1186 0 0 0 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.14
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 46.8 46.8 46.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.9 64.2 0.0 0.0 39.3 39.3
Volume/Cap: 0.58 0.69 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.43
Delay/Veh: 29.2 31.5 31.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.3 21.3 0.0 0.0 36.3 32.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 29.2 31.5 31.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.3 21.3 0.0 0.0 36.3 32.1
LOS by Move: C C C A A A D C+ A A D+ C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 13 16 16 0 0 0 9 19 0 0 15 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-136
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #41: Lawrence Expressway and Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2748***968
Lanes:0 0 2 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Ignore Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
41 0
Cycle Time (sec):160
0 0
1
Loss Time (sec):6
0
868*** 1 Critical V/C:1.001 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):52.3 0
0 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):50.6 0 0
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0***1474 236
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 14 10 10 14 110 10 14 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1228 236 764 2498 0 41 306 971 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1228 236 764 2498 0 41 306 971 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 112 0 142 163 0 0 452 226 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 134 0 62 87 0 0 110 98 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1474 236 968 2748 0 41 868 1295 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1474 236 968 2748 0 41 868 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1474 236 968 2748 0 41 868 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1474 236 968 2748 0 41 868 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.10 1.90 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 3150 3800 0 171 3615 1750 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.26 0.13 0.31 0.72 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 52.8 52.8 62.8 116 0.0 38.4 38.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.78 0.41 0.78 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 50.6 42.0 46.0 39.6 0.0 90.9 90.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 50.6 42.0 46.0 39.6 0.0 90.9 90.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D D D D A F F A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 21 9 26 74 0 25 25 0 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-137
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #41: Lawrence Expressway and Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2748***969
Lanes:0 0 2 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Ignore Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
41 0
Cycle Time (sec):160
0 0
1
Loss Time (sec):6
0
859*** 1 Critical V/C:1.004 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):53.2 0
0 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):51.2 0 0
LOS:D-
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0***1474 236
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 14 10 10 14 110 10 14 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1228 236 764 2498 0 41 306 971 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1228 236 764 2498 0 41 306 971 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 112 0 143 163 0 0 443 226 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 134 0 62 87 0 0 110 98 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1474 236 969 2748 0 41 859 1295 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1474 236 969 2748 0 41 859 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1474 236 969 2748 0 41 859 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1474 236 969 2748 0 41 859 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.95 0.97 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.09 1.91 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 3150 3800 0 169 3531 1750 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.26 0.13 0.31 0.72 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 52.6 52.6 62.6 115 0.0 38.8 38.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.79 0.41 0.79 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 50.9 42.1 46.2 40.6 0.0 91.7 91.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 50.9 42.1 46.2 40.6 0.0 91.7 91.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D D D D A F F A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 21 9 26 75 0 26 26 0 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-138
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #41: Lawrence Expressway and Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2751***976
Lanes:0 0 2 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Ignore Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
41*** 0
Cycle Time (sec):160
0 0
1
Loss Time (sec):6
0
860 1 Critical V/C:0.999 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):51.8 0
0 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):50.1 0 0
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0***1420 236
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 14 10 10 14 110 10 14 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1228 236 764 2498 0 41 306 971 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1228 236 764 2498 0 41 306 971 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 58 0 150 166 0 0 444 204 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 134 0 62 87 0 0 110 98 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1420 236 976 2751 0 41 860 1273 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1420 236 976 2751 0 41 860 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1420 236 976 2751 0 41 860 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1420 236 976 2751 0 41 860 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.10 1.90 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 3150 3800 0 172 3613 1750 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.25 0.13 0.31 0.72 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 51.7 51.7 64.2 116 0.0 38.1 38.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.77 0.42 0.77 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 50.9 42.9 44.5 39.0 0.0 90.8 90.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 50.9 42.9 44.5 39.0 0.0 90.8 90.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D D D D A F F A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 20 9 26 74 0 25 25 0 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-139
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #41: Lawrence Expressway and Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2754***982
Lanes:0 0 2 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Ignore Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
41*** 0
Cycle Time (sec):160
0 0
1
Loss Time (sec):6
0
1088 1 Critical V/C:1.063 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):74.2 0
0 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):65.1 0 0
LOS:E
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0***1435 236
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Calvert Drive/I-280 SB On-Ramp
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 14 10 10 14 110 10 14 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1228 236 764 2498 0 41 306 971 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1228 236 764 2498 0 41 306 971 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 73 0 156 169 0 0 672 257 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 134 0 62 87 0 0 110 98 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1435 236 982 2754 0 41 1088 1326 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1435 236 982 2754 0 41 1088 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1435 236 982 2754 0 41 1088 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1435 236 982 2754 0 41 1088 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.08 1.92 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 3150 3800 0 138 3651 1750 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.25 0.13 0.31 0.72 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 49.1 49.1 60.9 110 0.0 44.0 44.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.82 0.44 0.82 1.05 0.00 1.08 1.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 54.5 45.0 49.2 59.0 0.0 111.5 111 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 54.5 45.0 49.2 59.0 0.0 111.5 111 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D-D D E+ A F F A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 21 9 27 79 0 34 34 0 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-140
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #43: Lawrence Expressway and Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:615 2528 481***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
308 2
Cycle Time (sec):160
1 162
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
616*** 2 Critical V/C:0.629 2 533
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):52.1 0
312 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):46.0 1 139***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:211 1067***143
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 14 66 10 14 71 10 14 10 10 14 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 210 881 143 413 2093 576 291 586 304 138 496 133
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 210 881 143 413 2093 576 291 586 304 138 496 133
Added Vol: 1 88 0 43 303 0 0 26 2 0 28 13
App+Div: 0 98 0 25 132 39 17 4 6 1 9 16
Initial Fut: 211 1067 143 481 2528 615 308 616 312 139 533 162
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 211 1067 143 481 2528 615 308 616 312 139 533 162
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 211 1067 143 481 2528 615 308 616 312 139 533 162
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 211 1067 143 481 2528 615 308 616 312 139 533 162
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.19 0.08 0.15 0.44 0.35 0.10 0.16 0.18 0.08 0.14 0.09
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 16.1 66.0 82.5 31.8 81.7 102.3 20.6 33.7 49.8 16.5 29.6 29.6
Volume/Cap: 0.67 0.45 0.16 0.77 0.87 0.55 0.76 0.77 0.57 0.77 0.76 0.50
Delay/Veh: 74.6 34.1 20.5 66.4 37.5 16.6 75.3 64.0 47.6 87.9 66.6 59.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 74.6 34.1 20.5 66.4 37.5 16.6 75.3 64.0 47.6 87.9 66.6 59.8
LOS by Move: E C-C+ E D+ B E-E D F E E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 12 4 13 36 17 11 16 16 9 14 9
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-141
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #43: Lawrence Expressway and Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:615 2528 481***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
308 2
Cycle Time (sec):160
1 162
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
613*** 2 Critical V/C:0.628 2 527
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):52.1 0
312 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):45.9 1 139***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:211 1067***143
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 14 66 10 14 71 10 14 10 10 14 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 210 881 143 413 2093 576 291 586 304 138 496 133
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 210 881 143 413 2093 576 291 586 304 138 496 133
Added Vol: 1 88 0 43 303 0 0 23 2 0 22 13
App+Div: 0 98 0 25 132 39 17 4 6 1 9 16
Initial Fut: 211 1067 143 481 2528 615 308 613 312 139 527 162
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 211 1067 143 481 2528 615 308 613 312 139 527 162
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 211 1067 143 481 2528 615 308 613 312 139 527 162
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 211 1067 143 481 2528 615 308 613 312 139 527 162
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.19 0.08 0.15 0.44 0.35 0.10 0.16 0.18 0.08 0.14 0.09
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 16.1 66.0 82.6 31.8 81.7 102.5 20.7 33.6 49.7 16.6 29.4 29.4
Volume/Cap: 0.67 0.45 0.16 0.77 0.87 0.55 0.75 0.77 0.57 0.77 0.75 0.50
Delay/Veh: 74.6 34.1 20.5 66.3 37.5 16.5 74.9 64.0 47.7 87.7 66.5 60.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 74.6 34.1 20.5 66.3 37.5 16.5 74.9 64.0 47.7 87.7 66.5 60.0
LOS by Move: E C-C+ E D+ B E E D F E E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 12 4 13 36 17 11 16 16 9 14 9
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-142
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #43: Lawrence Expressway and Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:615 2489 481***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
308 2
Cycle Time (sec):160
1 162
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
609*** 2 Critical V/C:0.617 2 519
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):52.2 0
309 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):45.5 1 139***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:205 1016***143
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 14 66 10 14 71 10 14 10 10 14 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 210 881 143 413 2093 576 291 586 304 138 496 133
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 210 881 143 413 2093 576 291 586 304 138 496 133
Added Vol: -5 37 0 43 264 0 0 19 -1 0 14 13
App+Div: 0 98 0 25 132 39 17 4 6 1 9 16
Initial Fut: 205 1016 143 481 2489 615 308 609 309 139 519 162
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 205 1016 143 481 2489 615 308 609 309 139 519 162
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 205 1016 143 481 2489 615 308 609 309 139 519 162
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 205 1016 143 481 2489 615 308 609 309 139 519 162
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.18 0.08 0.15 0.44 0.35 0.10 0.16 0.18 0.08 0.14 0.09
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 16.1 66.0 82.6 31.9 81.8 102.7 20.9 33.5 49.6 16.6 29.2 29.2
Volume/Cap: 0.65 0.43 0.16 0.77 0.85 0.55 0.75 0.77 0.57 0.77 0.75 0.51
Delay/Veh: 73.7 33.7 20.5 66.1 36.6 16.4 74.5 64.0 47.7 87.4 66.4 60.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 73.7 33.7 20.5 66.1 36.6 16.4 74.5 64.0 47.7 87.4 66.4 60.3
LOS by Move: E C-C+ E D+ B E E D F E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 11 4 13 35 17 10 16 15 9 14 9
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-143
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #43: Lawrence Expressway and Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave (EX/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:615 2513 481***
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
308 2
Cycle Time (sec):160
1 162
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
628*** 2 Critical V/C:0.624 2 527
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):52.6 0
315 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):46.0 1 139***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:208 1023***143
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Lawrence Expressway Bollinger Rd/Moorpark Ave
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 14 66 10 14 71 10 14 10 10 14 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 210 881 143 413 2093 576 291 586 304 138 496 133
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 210 881 143 413 2093 576 291 586 304 138 496 133
Added Vol: -2 44 0 43 288 0 0 38 5 0 22 13
App+Div: 0 98 0 25 132 39 17 4 6 1 9 16
Initial Fut: 208 1023 143 481 2513 615 308 628 315 139 527 162
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 208 1023 143 481 2513 615 308 628 315 139 527 162
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 208 1023 143 481 2513 615 308 628 315 139 527 162
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 208 1023 143 481 2513 615 308 628 315 139 527 162
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.18 0.08 0.15 0.44 0.35 0.10 0.17 0.18 0.08 0.14 0.09
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 16.1 66.0 82.4 31.5 81.4 102.3 20.9 34.1 50.2 16.4 29.6 29.6
Volume/Cap: 0.66 0.44 0.16 0.78 0.87 0.55 0.75 0.78 0.57 0.78 0.75 0.50
Delay/Veh: 74.3 33.8 20.6 67.0 37.5 16.6 74.5 64.1 47.5 88.9 66.2 59.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 74.3 33.8 20.6 67.0 37.5 16.6 74.5 64.1 47.5 88.9 66.2 59.8
LOS by Move: E C-C+ E D+ B E E D F E E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 11 4 13 36 17 10 16 16 9 14 9
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-144
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #94: De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:260 2136***0
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
257 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 8
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1 1! Critical V/C:0.643 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):24.2 0
66*** 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):19.2 0 5***
LOS:B-
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:71***1215 4
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Rainbow Dr (south)
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 71 1111 4 0 1991 256 255 1 66 5 0 8
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 71 1111 4 0 1991 256 255 1 66 5 0 8
Added Vol: 0 104 0 0 145 4 2 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 71 1215 4 0 2136 260 257 1 66 5 0 8
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 71 1215 4 0 2136 260 257 1 66 5 0 8
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 71 1215 4 0 2136 260 257 1 66 5 0 8
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 71 1215 4 0 2136 260 257 1 66 5 0 8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.91 0.86 0.93 0.86 0.83 1.00 0.83
Lanes: 1.00 2.99 0.01 0.00 2.65 0.35 1.65 0.01 0.34 0.38 0.00 0.62
Final Sat.: 1663 5680 19 0 4954 603 2704 8 551 605 0 969
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.01
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 8.7 96.6 96.6 0.0 87.9 87.9 24.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 0.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.69 0.31 0.31 0.00 0.69 0.69 0.54 0.69 0.69 0.12 0.00 0.12
Delay/Veh: 81.9 8.6 8.6 0.0 17.6 17.6 53.8 58.4 58.4 61.3 0.0 61.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 81.9 8.6 8.6 0.0 17.6 17.6 53.8 58.4 58.4 61.3 0.0 61.3
LOS by Move: F A A A B B D-E+ E+ E A E
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 7 7 0 22 22 7 10 10 1 0 1
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
Lane Group: L RT RT xxxx RT RT LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR
#LnsInGrps: 1 3 3 0 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 4 4 4 4 xxxx 4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 0.98 0.98 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.92 xxxx 0.92
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.98 xxxx 0.98
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.90 1.00 0.90
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.91 0.86 0.93 0.86 0.83 1.00 0.83
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-145
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #94 De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 8.7 96.6 96.6 0.0 87.9 87.9 24.4 24.4 24.4 10.0 0.0 10.0
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 2.9 6.2 6.2 0.0 20.5 20.5 6.0 7.7 7.7 0.5 0.0 0.5
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Q2: 1.6 0.4 0.4 0.0 1.8 1.8 1.1 1.9 1.9 0.1 0.0 0.1
HCM2KQueue: 4.5 6.7 6.7 0.0 22.3 22.3 7.1 9.6 9.6 0.6 0.0 0.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.20 1.16 1.16 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.20 1.20 1.20
HCM2k70thQ: 5.4 7.9 7.9 0.0 25.8 25.8 8.4 11.4 11.4 0.8 0.0 0.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.56 1.54 1.54 1.60 1.44 1.44 1.54 1.52 1.52 1.59 1.60 1.59
HCM2k85thQ: 7.1 10.3 10.3 0.0 32.2 32.2 10.9 14.6 14.6 1.0 0.0 1.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.72 1.69 1.69 1.80 1.53 1.53 1.68 1.65 1.65 1.79 1.80 1.79
HCM2k90thQ: 7.8 11.3 11.3 0.0 34.2 34.2 11.9 15.9 15.9 1.1 0.0 1.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.97 1.91 1.91 2.10 1.67 1.67 1.90 1.85 1.85 2.08 2.10 2.08
HCM2k95thQ: 8.9 12.8 12.8 0.0 37.3 37.3 13.5 17.8 17.8 1.3 0.0 1.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.41 2.30 2.30 2.70 1.88 1.88 2.28 2.18 2.18 2.65 2.70 2.65
HCM2k98thQ: 10.9 15.4 15.4 0.0 41.9 41.9 16.2 21.0 21.0 1.7 0.0 1.7
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #94 De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 17.4 120 0.4 0.0 349 42.5 58.6 0.2 15.5 1.2 0.0 1.9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 101.380 pounds
16.424 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 316.305 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 24.203 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 4.252 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.914 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 101.380 pounds
16.424 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 316.305 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 24.203 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 4.252 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.914 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-146
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #94: De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:260 2198***0
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
257 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 8
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1*** 1! Critical V/C:0.640 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):23.2 0
66 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):18.3 0 5***
LOS:B-
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:71***1275 4
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Rainbow Dr (south)
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 71 1111 4 0 1991 256 255 1 66 5 0 8
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 71 1111 4 0 1991 256 255 1 66 5 0 8
Added Vol: 0 164 0 0 207 4 2 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 71 1275 4 0 2198 260 257 1 66 5 0 8
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 71 1275 4 0 2198 260 257 1 66 5 0 8
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 71 1275 4 0 2198 260 257 1 66 5 0 8
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 71 1275 4 0 2198 260 257 1 66 5 0 8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.99 0.01 0.00 2.67 0.33 1.65 0.01 0.34 0.38 0.00 0.62
Final Sat.: 1750 5582 18 0 5007 592 2900 9 591 673 0 1077
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.01 0.00 0.01
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 8.3 98.1 98.1 0.0 89.8 89.8 22.9 22.9 22.9 10.0 0.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.68 0.33 0.33 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.54 0.68 0.68 0.10 0.00 0.10
Delay/Veh: 81.8 8.2 8.2 0.0 16.6 16.6 54.8 59.3 59.3 61.2 0.0 61.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 81.8 8.2 8.2 0.0 16.6 16.6 54.8 59.3 59.3 61.2 0.0 61.2
LOS by Move: F A A A B B D-E+ E+ E A E
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 7 7 0 23 23 7 10 10 1 0 1
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-147
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #94: De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:260 2390***0
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
257 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 8
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1 1! Critical V/C:0.691 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):24.3 0
66*** 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):18.8 0 5***
LOS:B-
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:71***1463 4
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Rainbow Dr (south)
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 71 1111 4 0 1991 256 255 1 66 5 0 8
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 71 1111 4 0 1991 256 255 1 66 5 0 8
Added Vol: 0 352 0 0 399 4 2 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 71 1463 4 0 2390 260 257 1 66 5 0 8
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 71 1463 4 0 2390 260 257 1 66 5 0 8
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 71 1463 4 0 2390 260 257 1 66 5 0 8
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 71 1463 4 0 2390 260 257 1 66 5 0 8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.91 0.86 0.93 0.86 0.83 1.00 0.83
Lanes: 1.00 2.99 0.01 0.00 2.68 0.32 1.65 0.01 0.34 0.38 0.00 0.62
Final Sat.: 1663 5683 16 0 5021 546 2704 8 551 605 0 969
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.01
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 8.1 98.3 98.3 0.0 90.2 90.2 22.7 22.7 22.7 10.0 0.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.74 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.74 0.74 0.59 0.74 0.74 0.12 0.00 0.12
Delay/Veh: 90.7 8.4 8.4 0.0 17.7 17.7 55.9 62.4 62.4 61.3 0.0 61.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 90.7 8.4 8.4 0.0 17.7 17.7 55.9 62.4 62.4 61.3 0.0 61.3
LOS by Move: F A A A B B E+ E E E A E
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 8 8 0 26 26 7 10 10 1 0 1
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
Lane Group: L RT RT xxxx RT RT LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR
#LnsInGrps: 1 3 3 0 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 4 4 4 4 xxxx 4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 0.99 0.99 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.92 xxxx 0.92
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.98 xxxx 0.98
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.90 1.00 0.90
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.91 0.86 0.93 0.86 0.83 1.00 0.83
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-148
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #94 De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 8.1 98.3 98.3 0.0 90.2 90.2 22.7 22.7 22.7 10.0 0.0 10.0
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 3.0 7.6 7.6 0.0 23.5 23.5 6.1 7.9 7.9 0.5 0.0 0.5
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.83 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Q2: 1.8 0.6 0.6 0.0 2.2 2.2 1.3 2.3 2.3 0.1 0.0 0.1
HCM2KQueue: 4.8 8.2 8.2 0.0 25.7 25.7 7.4 10.1 10.1 0.6 0.0 0.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.20 1.15 1.15 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.20 1.20 1.20
HCM2k70thQ: 5.7 9.7 9.7 0.0 29.7 29.7 8.7 11.9 11.9 0.8 0.0 0.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.56 1.53 1.53 1.60 1.43 1.43 1.53 1.51 1.51 1.59 1.60 1.59
HCM2k85thQ: 7.4 12.5 12.5 0.0 36.7 36.7 11.3 15.3 15.3 1.0 0.0 1.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.71 1.67 1.67 1.80 1.51 1.51 1.68 1.64 1.64 1.79 1.80 1.79
HCM2k90thQ: 8.2 13.7 13.7 0.0 38.9 38.9 12.3 16.6 16.6 1.1 0.0 1.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.96 1.88 1.88 2.10 1.64 1.64 1.90 1.84 1.84 2.08 2.10 2.08
HCM2k95thQ: 9.4 15.4 15.4 0.0 42.3 42.3 14.0 18.7 18.7 1.3 0.0 1.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.39 2.23 2.23 2.70 1.84 1.84 2.27 2.16 2.16 2.65 2.70 2.65
HCM2k98thQ: 11.5 18.3 18.3 0.0 47.3 47.3 16.7 21.9 21.9 1.7 0.0 1.7
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #94 De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 17.5 147 0.4 0.0 406 44.1 59.5 0.2 15.7 1.2 0.0 1.9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 113.067 pounds
18.317 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 352.769 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 26.943 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 4.713 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.027 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 113.067 pounds
18.317 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 352.769 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 26.943 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 4.713 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.027 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-149
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #94: De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:260 2459***0
Lanes:0 1 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
257 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 8
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1 1! Critical V/C:0.704 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):24.5 0
66*** 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):18.8 0 5***
LOS:B-
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:71***1508 4
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Rainbow Dr (south)
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 71 1111 4 0 1991 256 255 1 66 5 0 8
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 71 1111 4 0 1991 256 255 1 66 5 0 8
Added Vol: 0 397 0 0 468 4 2 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 71 1508 4 0 2459 260 257 1 66 5 0 8
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 71 1508 4 0 2459 260 257 1 66 5 0 8
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 71 1508 4 0 2459 260 257 1 66 5 0 8
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 71 1508 4 0 2459 260 257 1 66 5 0 8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.91 0.86 0.93 0.86 0.83 1.00 0.83
Lanes: 1.00 2.99 0.01 0.00 2.69 0.31 1.65 0.01 0.34 0.38 0.00 0.62
Final Sat.: 1663 5684 15 0 5041 533 2704 8 551 605 0 969
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.10 0.12 0.12 0.01 0.00 0.01
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 7.9 98.7 98.7 0.0 90.8 90.8 22.3 22.3 22.3 10.0 0.0 10.0
Volume/Cap: 0.75 0.38 0.38 0.00 0.75 0.75 0.60 0.75 0.75 0.12 0.00 0.12
Delay/Veh: 93.4 8.3 8.3 0.0 17.8 17.8 56.5 63.5 63.5 61.3 0.0 61.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 93.4 8.3 8.3 0.0 17.8 17.8 56.5 63.5 63.5 61.3 0.0 61.3
LOS by Move: F A A A B B E+ E E E A E
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 8 8 0 27 27 7 10 10 1 0 1
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0
Lane Group: L RT RT xxxx RT RT LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR LTR
#LnsInGrps: 1 3 3 0 3 3 2 1 1 1 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 4 4 4 4 xxxx 4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 0.99 0.99 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.92 xxxx 0.92
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.98 xxxx 0.98
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.90 1.00 0.90
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.99 0.91 0.86 0.93 0.86 0.83 1.00 0.83
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-150
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #94 De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 7.9 98.7 98.7 0.0 90.8 90.8 22.3 22.3 22.3 10.0 0.0 10.0
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 3.0 7.9 7.9 0.0 24.4 24.4 6.1 7.9 7.9 0.5 0.0 0.5
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.83 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00
Q2: 1.9 0.6 0.6 0.0 2.4 2.4 1.4 2.4 2.4 0.1 0.0 0.1
HCM2KQueue: 4.9 8.5 8.5 0.0 26.8 26.8 7.4 10.3 10.3 0.6 0.0 0.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.20 1.15 1.15 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.20 1.20 1.20
HCM2k70thQ: 5.8 10.0 10.0 0.0 30.8 30.8 8.8 12.1 12.1 0.8 0.0 0.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.56 1.53 1.53 1.60 1.42 1.42 1.53 1.51 1.51 1.59 1.60 1.59
HCM2k85thQ: 7.5 12.9 12.9 0.0 38.1 38.1 11.4 15.5 15.5 1.0 0.0 1.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.71 1.66 1.66 1.80 1.50 1.50 1.68 1.64 1.64 1.79 1.80 1.79
HCM2k90thQ: 8.3 14.1 14.1 0.0 40.3 40.3 12.5 16.8 16.8 1.1 0.0 1.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.96 1.87 1.87 2.10 1.64 1.64 1.90 1.84 1.84 2.08 2.10 2.08
HCM2k95thQ: 9.5 15.9 15.9 0.0 43.8 43.8 14.1 18.9 18.9 1.3 0.0 1.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.39 2.22 2.22 2.70 1.83 1.83 2.26 2.15 2.15 2.65 2.70 2.65
HCM2k98thQ: 11.6 18.8 18.8 0.0 48.9 48.9 16.8 22.1 22.1 1.7 0.0 1.7
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #94 De Anza Blvd & Rainbow Dr (south)
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed:30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 17.5 151 0.4 0.0 422 44.6 59.7 0.2 15.8 1.2 0.0 1.9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 115.971 pounds
18.787 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 361.831 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 27.635 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 4.832 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.055 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 115.971 pounds
18.787 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 361.831 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 27.635 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 4.832 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.055 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-151
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #95: Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:16 27 64***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
28 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 39
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
743*** 2 Critical V/C:0.501 1 787
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):34.5 0
174 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):31.1 2 424***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Final Vol:77 34 601***
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Bubb Rd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 76 34 562 63 27 16 28 641 172 358 617 38
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 76 34 562 63 27 16 28 641 172 358 617 38
Added Vol: 1 0 39 1 0 0 0 102 2 66 170 1
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 77 34 601 64 27 16 28 743 174 424 787 39
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 77 34 601 64 27 16 28 743 174 424 787 39
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 77 34 601 64 27 16 28 743 174 424 787 39
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 77 34 601 64 27 16 28 743 174 424 787 39
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.89 0.97 0.70 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.79 0.99 0.91
Lanes: 0.71 0.29 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.90 0.10
Final Sat.: 1202 531 2677 1663 1900 1488 1663 3800 1488 2992 3581 177
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.06 0.22 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.20 0.12 0.14 0.22 0.22
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.1 23.1 62.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 17.4 54.6 54.6 39.6 76.7 76.7
Volume/Cap: 0.39 0.39 0.50 0.50 0.19 0.14 0.14 0.50 0.30 0.50 0.40 0.40
Delay/Veh: 53.0 53.0 27.9 65.2 61.1 60.9 54.9 32.7 29.8 42.5 18.5 18.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 53.0 53.0 27.9 65.2 61.1 60.9 54.9 32.7 29.8 42.5 18.5 18.5
LOS by Move: D-D-C E E E D-C-C D B-B-
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 5 11 4 1 1 1 12 5 9 10 10
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0
Lane Group: LT LT R L T R L T R L RT RT
#LnsInGrps: 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 4 4 xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.99 0.99
LT Adj: 0.97 0.97 xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.99 0.99
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.89 0.97 0.70 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.79 0.99 0.91
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-152
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #95 Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 23.1 23.1 62.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 17.4 54.6 54.6 39.6 76.7 76.7
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 4.1 4.1 10.0 2.6 1.0 0.6 1.1 11.0 5.1 8.3 9.3 9.3
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.54 0.54 0.54
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.82 0.82 0.82
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 0.75 0.68 0.49 0.75 0.75
Q2: 0.6 0.6 1.0 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.7 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5
HCM2KQueue: 4.7 4.7 11.0 3.5 1.2 0.8 1.1 11.7 5.4 8.8 9.8 9.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.17 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.18
HCM2k70thQ: 5.6 5.6 13.0 4.2 1.4 0.9 1.3 13.7 6.4 10.4 11.6 11.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.56 1.56 1.51 1.57 1.59 1.59 1.59 1.50 1.55 1.52 1.52 1.52
HCM2k85thQ: 7.3 7.3 16.6 5.5 1.9 1.3 1.8 17.6 8.3 13.4 14.9 14.9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.72 1.72 1.63 1.74 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.62 1.71 1.66 1.64 1.64
HCM2k90thQ: 8.1 8.1 18.0 6.1 2.1 1.4 2.0 19.0 9.2 14.6 16.2 16.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.96 1.96 1.83 1.99 2.06 2.07 2.06 1.81 1.95 1.87 1.85 1.85
HCM2k95thQ: 9.2 9.2 20.1 7.0 2.5 1.6 2.3 21.2 10.4 16.4 18.2 18.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.40 2.40 2.13 2.46 2.61 2.64 2.62 2.11 2.36 2.21 2.17 2.17
HCM2k98thQ: 11.3 11.3 23.5 8.6 3.2 2.1 2.9 24.6 12.7 19.4 21.4 21.4
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #95 Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 17.2 7.6 107.0 15.4 6.3 3.7 6.2 141 30.1 88.6 114 5.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 101.782 pounds
16.489 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 317.561 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 25.430 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 4.825 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.843 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 101.782 pounds
16.489 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 317.561 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 25.430 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 4.825 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.843 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-153
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #95: Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:16 27 64***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
28 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 39
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
750*** 2 Critical V/C:0.484 1 783
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):34.2 0
173 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):31.0 2 388***
LOS:C
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Final Vol:79 34 657***
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Bubb Rd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 76 34 562 63 27 16 28 641 172 358 617 38
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 76 34 562 63 27 16 28 641 172 358 617 38
Added Vol: 3 0 95 1 0 0 0 109 1 30 166 1
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 79 34 657 64 27 16 28 750 173 388 783 39
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 79 34 657 64 27 16 28 750 173 388 783 39
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 79 34 657 64 27 16 28 750 173 388 783 39
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 79 34 657 64 27 16 28 750 173 388 783 39
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.97 0.95
Lanes: 0.70 0.30 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.90 0.10
Final Sat.: 1258 542 3150 1750 1900 1750 1750 3800 1750 3150 3524 176
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.06 0.21 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.20 0.10 0.12 0.22 0.22
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 24.7 24.7 60.3 10.6 10.6 10.6 17.0 57.1 57.1 35.6 75.7 75.7
Volume/Cap: 0.36 0.36 0.48 0.48 0.19 0.12 0.13 0.48 0.24 0.48 0.41 0.41
Delay/Veh: 51.3 51.3 28.9 64.9 61.3 60.8 55.2 30.8 27.4 44.8 19.1 19.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 51.3 51.3 28.9 64.9 61.3 60.8 55.2 30.8 27.4 44.8 19.1 19.1
LOS by Move: D-D-C E E E E+ C C D B-B-
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 5 12 3 1 1 1 11 5 8 10 10
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-154
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #95: Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:16 27 64***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
28 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 39
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
822*** 2 Critical V/C:0.581 1 889
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):36.5 0
174 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):33.2 2 417***
LOS:C-
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Final Vol:81 34 740***
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Bubb Rd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 76 34 562 63 27 16 28 641 172 358 617 38
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 76 34 562 63 27 16 28 641 172 358 617 38
Added Vol: 5 0 178 1 0 0 0 181 2 59 272 1
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 81 34 740 64 27 16 28 822 174 417 889 39
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 81 34 740 64 27 16 28 822 174 417 889 39
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 81 34 740 64 27 16 28 822 174 417 889 39
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 81 34 740 64 27 16 28 822 174 417 889 39
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.89 0.97 0.70 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.79 0.99 0.92
Lanes: 0.72 0.28 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.91 0.09
Final Sat.: 1219 512 2677 1663 1900 1488 1663 3800 1488 2992 3605 158
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.07 0.28 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.22 0.12 0.14 0.25 0.25
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 32.8 32.8 66.2 10.0 10.0 10.0 14.4 51.8 51.8 33.4 70.8 70.8
Volume/Cap: 0.28 0.28 0.58 0.54 0.20 0.15 0.16 0.58 0.32 0.58 0.49 0.49
Delay/Veh: 44.3 44.3 27.6 67.7 62.0 61.7 57.8 36.1 31.8 48.4 22.9 22.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 44.3 44.3 27.6 67.7 62.0 61.7 57.8 36.1 31.8 48.4 22.9 22.9
LOS by Move: D D C E E E E+ D+ C D C+ C+
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 4 14 4 1 1 1 14 6 9 13 13
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0
Lane Group: LT LT R L T R L T R L RT RT
#LnsInGrps: 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 4 4 xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.99 0.99
LT Adj: 0.97 0.97 xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.99 0.99
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.89 0.97 0.70 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.79 0.99 0.92
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-155
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #95 Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 32.8 32.8 66.2 10.0 10.0 10.0 14.4 51.8 51.8 33.4 70.8 70.8
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 3.9 3.9 12.6 2.6 1.0 0.6 1.1 12.8 5.2 8.7 11.9 11.9
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.55 0.55 0.55
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.82 0.82 0.82
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.32 0.71 0.64 0.44 0.71 0.71
Q2: 0.4 0.4 1.4 1.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 1.0 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.7
HCM2KQueue: 4.3 4.3 14.0 3.6 1.2 0.8 1.1 13.8 5.5 9.3 12.5 12.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.19 1.19 1.17 1.19 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.17 1.19 1.18 1.17 1.17
HCM2k70thQ: 5.1 5.1 16.4 4.3 1.5 1.0 1.4 16.2 6.6 10.9 14.7 14.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.56 1.56 1.49 1.57 1.59 1.59 1.59 1.49 1.55 1.52 1.50 1.50
HCM2k85thQ: 6.7 6.7 20.8 5.7 2.0 1.3 1.8 20.6 8.6 14.1 18.8 18.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.72 1.72 1.60 1.73 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.60 1.70 1.65 1.61 1.61
HCM2k90thQ: 7.4 7.4 22.4 6.3 2.2 1.4 2.0 22.1 9.4 15.3 20.2 20.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.97 1.97 1.78 1.99 2.06 2.07 2.06 1.78 1.94 1.86 1.80 1.80
HCM2k95thQ: 8.4 8.4 24.9 7.2 2.5 1.7 2.4 24.6 10.7 17.2 22.6 22.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.42 2.42 2.04 2.46 2.61 2.64 2.62 2.05 2.35 2.19 2.08 2.08
HCM2k98thQ: 10.4 10.4 28.6 8.9 3.2 2.1 3.0 28.3 13.0 20.3 26.1 26.1
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #95 Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 16.6 7.0 134.8 15.5 6.4 3.8 6.4 165 31.0 92.3 146 6.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 117.854 pounds
19.092 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 367.704 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 29.612 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 5.664 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.969 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 117.854 pounds
19.092 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 367.704 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 29.612 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 5.664 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.969 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-156
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #95: Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:16 27 69***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
28 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 49
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
842*** 2 Critical V/C:0.605 1 916
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):37.2 0
174 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):33.8 2 424***
LOS:C-
Lanes:0 1 0 0 2
Final Vol:83 34 776***
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Bubb Rd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 76 34 562 63 27 16 28 641 172 358 617 38
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 76 34 562 63 27 16 28 641 172 358 617 38
Added Vol: 7 0 214 6 0 0 0 201 2 66 299 11
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 83 34 776 69 27 16 28 842 174 424 916 49
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 83 34 776 69 27 16 28 842 174 424 916 49
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 83 34 776 69 27 16 28 842 174 424 916 49
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 83 34 776 69 27 16 28 842 174 424 916 49
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.89 0.97 0.70 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.79 0.99 0.91
Lanes: 0.73 0.27 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.89 0.11
Final Sat.: 1227 503 2677 1663 1900 1488 1663 3800 1488 2992 3563 191
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.07 0.29 0.04 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.22 0.12 0.14 0.26 0.26
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 34.2 34.2 66.9 10.0 10.0 10.0 13.6 51.1 51.1 32.7 70.2 70.2
Volume/Cap: 0.28 0.28 0.61 0.58 0.20 0.15 0.17 0.61 0.32 0.61 0.51 0.51
Delay/Veh: 43.3 43.3 27.7 70.1 62.0 61.7 58.5 37.0 32.3 49.5 23.7 23.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 43.3 43.3 27.7 70.1 62.0 61.7 58.5 37.0 32.3 49.5 23.7 23.7
LOS by Move: D D C E E E E+ D+ C-D C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 4 15 4 1 1 1 14 6 10 13 13
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0
Lane Group: LT LT R L T R L T R L RT RT
#LnsInGrps: 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 4 4 xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.99 0.99
LT Adj: 0.97 0.97 xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.97 0.97 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.99 0.99
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.89 0.97 0.70 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.79 0.99 0.91
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-157
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #95 Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 34.2 34.2 66.9 10.0 10.0 10.0 13.6 51.1 51.1 32.7 70.2 70.2
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 3.9 3.9 13.4 2.8 1.0 0.6 1.1 13.4 5.3 8.9 12.7 12.7
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.56 0.56 0.56
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.81 0.81 0.81
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.31 0.70 0.63 0.43 0.70 0.70
Q2: 0.4 0.4 1.5 1.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 1.0 0.3 0.6 0.7 0.7
HCM2KQueue: 4.3 4.3 14.9 4.0 1.2 0.8 1.1 14.4 5.6 9.5 13.4 13.4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.19 1.19 1.17 1.19 1.20 1.20 1.20 1.17 1.19 1.18 1.17 1.17
HCM2k70thQ: 5.1 5.1 17.4 4.8 1.5 1.0 1.4 16.8 6.6 11.2 15.7 15.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.56 1.56 1.48 1.56 1.59 1.59 1.59 1.49 1.55 1.52 1.49 1.49
HCM2k85thQ: 6.7 6.7 22.1 6.3 2.0 1.3 1.8 21.4 8.6 14.5 20.0 20.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.72 1.72 1.59 1.73 1.78 1.78 1.78 1.59 1.70 1.65 1.60 1.60
HCM2k90thQ: 7.4 7.4 23.6 6.9 2.2 1.4 2.0 23.0 9.5 15.7 21.5 21.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.97 1.97 1.76 1.98 2.06 2.07 2.06 1.77 1.94 1.85 1.79 1.79
HCM2k95thQ: 8.5 8.5 26.2 7.9 2.5 1.7 2.4 25.5 10.8 17.7 23.9 23.9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.42 2.42 2.02 2.43 2.61 2.64 2.62 2.03 2.35 2.18 2.06 2.06
HCM2k98thQ: 10.4 10.4 30.0 9.7 3.2 2.1 3.0 29.2 13.1 20.8 27.5 27.5
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #95 Bubb Rd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 16.8 6.9 142.7 16.7 6.4 3.8 6.4 172 31.3 94.7 154 8.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 123.129 pounds
19.947 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 384.164 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 30.982 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 5.939 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.011 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 123.129 pounds
19.947 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 384.164 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 30.982 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 5.939 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.011 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-158
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #96: N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 424***271
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
63 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 193
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
506 2 Critical V/C:0.760 2 493
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):50.7 0
319*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):43.6 1 254***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:281***321 127
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd Homestead Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 239 320 64 271 424 119 63 481 272 189 453 193
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 239 320 64 271 424 119 63 481 272 189 453 193
Added Vol: 42 1 63 0 0 0 0 25 47 65 40 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 281 321 127 271 424 119 63 506 319 254 493 193
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 281 321 127 271 424 0 63 506 319 254 493 193
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 281 321 127 271 424 0 63 506 319 254 493 193
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 281 321 127 271 424 0 63 506 319 254 493 193
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.79 0.96 0.88 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78
Lanes: 2.00 1.40 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 2992 2547 1008 1663 1900 1750 1663 3800 1488 1663 3800 1488
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.13 0.13 0.16 0.22 0.00 0.04 0.13 0.21 0.15 0.13 0.13
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 14.8 21.8 21.8 28.2 35.2 0.0 18.0 33.8 33.8 24.1 40.0 40.0
Volume/Cap: 0.76 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.76 0.00 0.25 0.47 0.76 0.76 0.39 0.39
Delay/Veh: 59.8 49.2 49.2 47.2 44.6 0.0 45.6 36.0 47.3 55.0 30.9 31.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 59.8 49.2 49.2 47.2 44.6 0.0 45.6 36.0 47.3 55.0 30.9 31.2
LOS by Move: E+ D D D D A D D+ D E+ C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 8 9 9 11 16 0 2 8 13 11 7 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L T R
#LnsInGrps: 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 0.96 0.96 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.79 0.96 0.88 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-159
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #96 N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 14.8 21.8 21.8 28.2 35.2 0.0 18.0 33.8 33.8 24.1 40.0 40.0
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 5.5 7.2 7.2 9.0 12.9 0.0 2.0 7.0 10.6 8.7 6.3 5.4
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2: 2.3 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.7 0.0 0.3 0.9 2.7 2.6 0.6 0.6
HCM2KQueue: 7.8 9.1 9.1 11.0 15.6 0.0 2.3 7.9 13.2 11.2 6.9 6.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.17 1.20 1.19 1.18 1.17 1.18 1.18 1.19
HCM2k70thQ: 9.2 10.8 10.8 12.9 18.2 0.0 2.8 9.3 15.5 13.2 8.2 7.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.53 1.52 1.52 1.51 1.48 1.60 1.58 1.53 1.49 1.51 1.54 1.55
HCM2k85thQ: 12.0 13.9 13.9 16.5 23.0 0.0 3.7 12.0 19.7 16.9 10.7 9.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.67 1.65 1.65 1.63 1.58 1.80 1.76 1.67 1.61 1.63 1.68 1.70
HCM2k90thQ: 13.1 15.1 15.1 17.9 24.7 0.0 4.1 13.1 21.2 18.3 11.7 10.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.89 1.86 1.86 1.83 1.75 2.10 2.03 1.89 1.79 1.82 1.91 1.93
HCM2k95thQ: 14.8 17.0 17.0 20.0 27.3 0.0 4.8 14.8 23.6 20.5 13.2 11.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.25 2.20 2.20 2.13 2.00 2.70 2.53 2.25 2.06 2.12 2.29 2.33
HCM2k98thQ: 17.6 20.0 20.0 23.4 31.2 0.0 6.0 17.7 27.2 23.8 15.8 13.9
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #96 N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 68.0 75.1 29.7 61.9 96.4 0.0 13.9 105 72.9 59.9 94.4 37.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 139.576 pounds
22.611 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 435.476 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 35.826 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 7.076 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.102 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 139.576 pounds
22.611 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 435.476 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 35.826 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 7.076 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.102 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-160
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #96: N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 424***271
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
63 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 193
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
585 2 Critical V/C:0.713 2 567
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):47.5 0
318*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):42.2 1 256***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:285***321 134
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd Homestead Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 239 320 64 271 424 119 63 481 272 189 453 193
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 239 320 64 271 424 119 63 481 272 189 453 193
Added Vol: 46 1 70 0 0 0 0 104 46 67 114 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 285 321 134 271 424 119 63 585 318 256 567 193
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 285 321 134 271 424 0 63 585 318 256 567 193
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 285 321 134 271 424 0 63 585 318 256 567 193
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 285 321 134 271 424 0 63 585 318 256 567 193
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 0.98 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 1.39 0.61 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 2610 1089 1750 1900 1750 1750 3800 1750 1750 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.22 0.00 0.04 0.15 0.18 0.15 0.15 0.11
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 15.2 23.4 23.4 29.4 37.6 0.0 15.5 30.6 30.6 24.6 39.7 39.7
Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.71 0.00 0.28 0.60 0.71 0.71 0.45 0.33
Delay/Veh: 56.3 46.2 46.2 43.5 40.5 0.0 47.9 40.5 46.1 51.0 31.8 30.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 56.3 46.2 46.2 43.5 40.5 0.0 47.9 40.5 46.1 51.0 31.8 30.5
LOS by Move: E+ D D D D A D D D D-C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 8 9 9 10 15 0 2 10 13 11 8 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-161
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #96: N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 424***274
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
64 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 196
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
689 2 Critical V/C:0.795 2 704
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):53.5 0
336*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):44.4 1 270***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:312***321 175
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd Homestead Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 239 320 64 271 424 119 63 481 272 189 453 193
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 239 320 64 271 424 119 63 481 272 189 453 193
Added Vol: 73 1 111 3 0 1 1 208 64 81 251 3
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 312 321 175 274 424 120 64 689 336 270 704 196
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 312 321 175 274 424 0 64 689 336 270 704 196
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 312 321 175 274 424 0 64 689 336 270 704 196
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 312 321 175 274 424 0 64 689 336 270 704 196
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.79 0.95 0.87 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78
Lanes: 2.00 1.26 0.74 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 2992 2261 1232 1663 1900 1750 1663 3800 1488 1663 3800 1488
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.16 0.22 0.00 0.04 0.18 0.23 0.16 0.19 0.13
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 15.7 22.9 22.9 26.5 33.7 0.0 14.0 34.1 34.1 24.5 44.6 44.6
Volume/Cap: 0.80 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.80 0.00 0.33 0.64 0.80 0.80 0.50 0.35
Delay/Veh: 61.3 50.4 50.4 51.6 48.1 0.0 49.7 38.9 49.8 57.6 29.4 27.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 61.3 50.4 50.4 51.6 48.1 0.0 49.7 38.9 49.8 57.6 29.4 27.7
LOS by Move: E D D D-D A D D+ D E+ C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 10 10 12 16 0 3 12 14 12 10 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L T R
#LnsInGrps: 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 0.95 0.95 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.79 0.95 0.87 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-162
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #96 N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 15.7 22.9 22.9 26.5 33.7 0.0 14.0 34.1 34.1 24.5 44.6 44.6
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 6.1 8.0 8.0 9.2 13.1 0.0 2.1 10.0 11.2 9.3 9.1 5.1
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2: 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.5 3.2 0.0 0.5 1.7 3.1 3.0 1.0 0.5
HCM2KQueue: 8.8 10.4 10.4 11.7 16.2 0.0 2.6 11.7 14.3 12.2 10.0 5.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.17 1.17 1.20 1.19 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.18 1.19
HCM2k70thQ: 10.4 12.3 12.3 13.7 18.9 0.0 3.1 13.7 16.8 14.4 11.8 6.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.52 1.51 1.51 1.50 1.47 1.60 1.58 1.50 1.49 1.50 1.51 1.55
HCM2k85thQ: 13.4 15.8 15.8 17.6 24.0 0.0 4.1 17.6 21.3 18.4 15.2 8.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.66 1.64 1.64 1.62 1.58 1.80 1.75 1.62 1.60 1.62 1.64 1.70
HCM2k90thQ: 14.5 17.1 17.1 19.0 25.6 0.0 4.6 19.0 22.9 19.8 16.5 9.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.87 1.84 1.84 1.81 1.74 2.10 2.02 1.81 1.77 1.80 1.84 1.94
HCM2k95thQ: 16.4 19.2 19.2 21.2 28.3 0.0 5.3 21.2 25.4 22.1 18.5 11.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.21 2.15 2.15 2.11 1.99 2.70 2.52 2.11 2.03 2.09 2.16 2.35
HCM2k98thQ: 19.4 22.4 22.4 24.6 32.3 0.0 6.6 24.6 29.1 25.6 21.7 13.3
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #96 N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 75.7 75.7 41.3 63.9 98.2 0.0 14.7 151 77.7 64.1 136 35.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 163.526 pounds
26.491 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 510.201 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 42.024 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 8.315 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.288 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 163.526 pounds
26.491 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 510.201 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 42.024 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 8.315 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.288 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-163
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #96: N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 424***277
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
64 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 198
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
718 2 Critical V/C:0.796 2 737
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):53.6 0
336*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):44.4 1 271***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:312***321 178
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd Homestead Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 239 320 64 271 424 119 63 481 272 189 453 193
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 239 320 64 271 424 119 63 481 272 189 453 193
Added Vol: 73 1 114 6 0 1 1 237 64 82 284 5
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 312 321 178 277 424 120 64 718 336 271 737 198
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 312 321 178 277 424 0 64 718 336 271 737 198
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 312 321 178 277 424 0 64 718 336 271 737 198
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 312 321 178 277 424 0 64 718 336 271 737 198
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.79 0.95 0.87 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78
Lanes: 2.00 1.25 0.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 2992 2244 1244 1663 1900 1750 1663 3800 1488 1663 3800 1488
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.17 0.22 0.00 0.04 0.19 0.23 0.16 0.19 0.13
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 15.7 22.8 22.8 26.6 33.6 0.0 13.6 34.1 34.1 24.6 45.1 45.1
Volume/Cap: 0.80 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.80 0.00 0.34 0.67 0.80 0.80 0.52 0.35
Delay/Veh: 61.4 50.8 50.8 52.1 48.2 0.0 50.2 39.5 49.9 57.6 29.3 27.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 61.4 50.8 50.8 52.1 48.2 0.0 50.2 39.5 49.9 57.6 29.3 27.4
LOS by Move: E D D D-D A D D D E+ C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 11 11 12 16 0 3 12 14 12 11 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L T R
#LnsInGrps: 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 0.95 0.95 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.79 0.95 0.87 0.88 1.00 0.92 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-164
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #96 N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 15.7 22.8 22.8 26.6 33.6 0.0 13.6 34.1 34.1 24.6 45.1 45.1
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 6.1 8.1 8.1 9.4 13.1 0.0 2.1 10.6 11.3 9.3 9.5 5.2
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2: 2.7 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.2 0.0 0.5 1.8 3.1 3.0 1.0 0.5
HCM2KQueue: 8.8 10.6 10.6 11.9 16.3 0.0 2.6 12.4 14.3 12.3 10.6 5.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.17 1.17 1.20 1.19 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.18 1.19
HCM2k70thQ: 10.4 12.4 12.4 14.0 19.0 0.0 3.1 14.6 16.8 14.4 12.4 6.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.52 1.51 1.51 1.50 1.47 1.60 1.57 1.50 1.49 1.50 1.51 1.55
HCM2k85thQ: 13.4 16.0 16.0 17.9 24.0 0.0 4.2 18.6 21.3 18.4 16.0 8.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.66 1.64 1.64 1.62 1.58 1.80 1.75 1.62 1.60 1.62 1.64 1.70
HCM2k90thQ: 14.6 17.3 17.3 19.3 25.6 0.0 4.6 20.0 22.9 19.9 17.3 9.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.87 1.83 1.83 1.81 1.74 2.10 2.02 1.80 1.77 1.80 1.83 1.94
HCM2k95thQ: 16.4 19.4 19.4 21.5 28.3 0.0 5.3 22.3 25.4 22.2 19.4 11.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.21 2.14 2.14 2.10 1.99 2.70 2.52 2.09 2.03 2.09 2.14 2.34
HCM2k98thQ: 19.4 22.7 22.7 25.0 32.3 0.0 6.6 25.9 29.1 25.7 22.6 13.4
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #96 N Stelling Rd & Homestead Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 75.7 75.8 42.1 64.7 98.2 0.0 14.8 159 77.7 64.4 143 35.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 166.773 pounds
27.017 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 520.331 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 42.862 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 8.482 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.314 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 166.773 pounds
27.017 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 520.331 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 42.862 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 8.482 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.314 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-165
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #131: Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:77 213 235***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
269 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 203
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1858*** 2 Critical V/C:0.812 2 1279
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):40.9 0
76 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):40.0 1 210***
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Final Vol:58 95 179***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 58 93 173 131 206 63 128 1642 76 194 993 83
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 58 93 173 131 206 63 128 1642 76 194 993 83
Added Vol: 0 2 6 104 7 14 141 216 0 16 286 120
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 58 95 179 235 213 77 269 1858 76 210 1279 203
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 58 95 179 235 213 77 269 1858 76 210 1279 203
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 58 95 179 235 213 77 269 1858 76 210 1279 203
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 58 95 179 235 213 77 269 1858 76 210 1279 203
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 0.99 0.92 0.88 0.98 0.90
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.87 0.13 1.00 2.56 0.44
Final Sat.: 1663 1900 1488 1663 1900 1488 1663 5425 222 1663 4760 756
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.05 0.12 0.14 0.11 0.05 0.16 0.34 0.34 0.13 0.27 0.27
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 13.2 17.8 17.8 20.9 25.4 25.4 26.1 50.6 50.6 18.7 43.3 43.3
Volume/Cap: 0.32 0.34 0.81 0.81 0.53 0.24 0.75 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.75 0.75
Delay/Veh: 50.2 46.5 69.4 63.4 43.3 39.7 52.1 32.7 32.7 66.3 35.1 35.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 50.2 46.5 69.4 63.4 43.3 39.7 52.1 32.7 32.7 66.3 35.1 35.1
LOS by Move: D D E E D D D-C-C-E D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 3 9 11 7 3 12 23 23 7 15 15
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0
Lane Group: L T R L T R L RT RT L RT RT
#LnsInGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 3 3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx 0.98 0.98
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.98 0.98
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 0.99 0.92 0.88 0.98 0.90
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-166
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #131 Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 13.2 17.8 17.8 20.9 25.4 25.4 26.1 50.6 50.6 18.7 43.3 43.3
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 1.9 2.8 6.3 8.2 6.3 2.3 9.1 19.0 19.0 7.3 14.6 14.6
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.06 1.06 1.06
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.09
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.03 0.06 0.06
Q2: 0.5 0.5 2.9 3.1 1.1 0.3 2.4 3.6 3.6 0.1 0.2 0.2
HCM2KQueue: 2.4 3.3 9.1 11.2 7.4 2.6 11.5 22.6 22.6 7.5 14.7 14.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.17 1.16 1.16 1.18 1.17 1.17
HCM2k70thQ: 2.8 4.0 10.8 13.2 8.7 3.1 13.6 26.1 26.1 8.9 17.2 17.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.58 1.57 1.52 1.51 1.53 1.57 1.50 1.44 1.44 1.53 1.48 1.48
HCM2k85thQ: 3.8 5.2 13.9 16.9 11.3 4.2 17.4 32.5 32.5 11.5 21.9 21.9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.76 1.74 1.65 1.63 1.68 1.75 1.62 1.53 1.53 1.68 1.59 1.59
HCM2k90thQ: 4.2 5.8 15.1 18.3 12.4 4.6 18.7 34.5 34.5 12.5 23.5 23.5
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 2.03 2.00 1.86 1.82 1.90 2.02 1.82 1.67 1.67 1.90 1.76 1.76
HCM2k95thQ: 4.8 6.7 17.0 20.5 14.0 5.3 21.0 37.7 37.7 14.2 26.0 26.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.53 2.47 2.20 2.12 2.27 2.52 2.11 1.88 1.88 2.26 2.02 2.02
HCM2k98thQ: 6.0 8.3 20.0 23.8 16.7 6.6 24.4 42.3 42.3 16.9 29.8 29.8
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #131 Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 13.4 21.3 43.3 56.5 47.3 16.0 62.8 408 16.7 50.7 280 44.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 192.343 pounds
31.160 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 600.109 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 49.035 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 9.566 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.561 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 192.343 pounds
31.160 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 600.109 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 49.035 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 9.566 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.561 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-167
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #131: Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:73 213 199***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
203 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 160
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1886*** 2 Critical V/C:0.763 2 1290
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):36.1 0
76 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):34.9 1 210***
LOS:C-
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Final Vol:58 95 179***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 58 93 173 131 206 63 128 1642 76 194 993 83
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 58 93 173 131 206 63 128 1642 76 194 993 83
Added Vol: 0 2 6 68 7 10 75 244 0 16 297 77
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 58 95 179 199 213 73 203 1886 76 210 1290 160
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 58 95 179 199 213 73 203 1886 76 210 1290 160
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 58 95 179 199 213 73 203 1886 76 210 1290 160
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 58 95 179 199 213 73 203 1886 76 210 1290 160
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.88 0.12 1.00 2.66 0.34
Final Sat.: 1750 1900 1750 1750 1900 1750 1750 5383 217 1750 4981 618
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.05 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.04 0.12 0.35 0.35 0.12 0.26 0.26
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 11.6 16.1 16.1 17.9 22.4 22.4 22.9 55.1 55.1 18.9 51.1 51.1
Volume/Cap: 0.34 0.37 0.76 0.76 0.60 0.22 0.61 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.61 0.61
Delay/Veh: 51.8 48.3 63.8 61.5 47.6 41.8 47.7 28.4 28.4 60.3 27.1 27.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 51.8 48.3 63.8 61.5 47.6 41.8 47.7 28.4 28.4 60.3 27.1 27.1
LOS by Move: D-D E E D D D C C E C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 3 9 9 8 3 8 21 21 7 13 13
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-168
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #131: Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:81 222 251***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
356*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 256
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1911 2 Critical V/C:0.821 2 1373***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):45.1 0
76 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):37.8 1 152
LOS:D+
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Final Vol:58 104 115***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 58 93 173 131 206 63 128 1642 76 194 993 83
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 58 93 173 131 206 63 128 1642 76 194 993 83
Added Vol: 0 11 -58 120 16 18 228 269 0 -42 380 173
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 58 104 115 251 222 81 356 1911 76 152 1373 256
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 58 104 115 251 222 81 356 1911 76 152 1373 256
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 58 104 115 251 222 81 356 1911 76 152 1373 256
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 58 104 115 251 222 81 356 1911 76 152 1373 256
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 0.99 0.92 0.88 0.98 0.90
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.88 0.12 1.00 2.49 0.51
Final Sat.: 1663 1900 1488 1663 1900 1488 1663 5431 216 1663 4627 863
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.15 0.12 0.05 0.21 0.35 0.35 0.09 0.30 0.30
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 11.1 11.3 11.3 22.1 22.2 22.2 31.3 59.2 59.2 15.4 43.4 43.4
Volume/Cap: 0.38 0.58 0.82 0.82 0.63 0.29 0.82 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.82 0.82
Delay/Veh: 52.7 56.9 83.9 63.2 48.7 42.7 53.6 24.6 24.6 61.0 37.7 37.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 52.7 56.9 83.9 63.2 48.7 42.7 53.6 24.6 24.6 61.0 37.7 37.7
LOS by Move: D-E+ F E D D D-C C E D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 3 5 7 12 8 3 16 20 20 5 17 17
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0
Lane Group: L T R L T R L RT RT L RT RT
#LnsInGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 3 3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx 0.98 0.98
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.98 0.98
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 0.99 0.92 0.88 0.98 0.90
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-169
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #131 Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 11.1 11.3 11.3 22.1 22.2 22.2 31.3 59.2 59.2 15.4 43.4 43.4
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 2.0 3.3 4.1 8.7 6.8 2.5 12.1 17.3 17.3 5.3 16.7 16.7
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.94 0.94
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.23
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.08 0.15 0.15
Q2: 0.6 1.2 2.6 3.2 1.6 0.4 3.5 2.3 2.3 0.2 0.7 0.7
HCM2KQueue: 2.6 4.6 6.7 11.9 8.4 2.9 15.6 19.6 19.6 5.5 17.3 17.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.17 1.16 1.16 1.19 1.16 1.16
HCM2k70thQ: 3.0 5.4 7.9 14.0 9.9 3.5 18.2 22.8 22.8 6.5 20.2 20.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.58 1.56 1.54 1.50 1.53 1.57 1.48 1.46 1.46 1.55 1.47 1.47
HCM2k85thQ: 4.0 7.1 10.3 17.9 12.8 4.6 23.0 28.6 28.6 8.5 25.4 25.4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.75 1.72 1.69 1.62 1.66 1.75 1.58 1.55 1.55 1.70 1.57 1.57
HCM2k90thQ: 4.5 7.8 11.3 19.3 13.9 5.1 24.7 30.4 30.4 9.3 27.2 27.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 2.02 1.97 1.91 1.81 1.88 2.01 1.75 1.70 1.70 1.94 1.73 1.73
HCM2k95thQ: 5.2 8.9 12.8 21.6 15.7 5.9 27.3 33.4 33.4 10.6 29.9 29.9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.52 2.40 2.30 2.10 2.22 2.50 2.00 1.92 1.92 2.36 1.96 1.96
HCM2k98thQ: 6.4 10.9 15.4 25.1 18.6 7.3 31.2 37.7 37.7 12.9 34.0 34.0
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #131 Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 13.6 24.9 28.2 60.3 51.2 17.4 83.7 373 14.8 36.5 312 58.1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 192.630 pounds
31.206 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 601.004 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 48.893 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 9.475 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.578 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 192.630 pounds
31.206 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 601.004 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 48.893 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 9.475 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.578 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-170
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #131: Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:84 223 277***
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
415*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 316
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1983 2 Critical V/C:0.927 2 1538***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):55.3 0
76 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):43.5 1 165
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 1 0 1
Final Vol:58 104 119***
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Blaney Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 58 93 173 131 206 63 128 1642 76 194 993 83
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 58 93 173 131 206 63 128 1642 76 194 993 83
Added Vol: 0 11 -54 146 17 21 287 341 0 -29 545 233
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 58 104 119 277 223 84 415 1983 76 165 1538 316
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 58 104 119 277 223 84 415 1983 76 165 1538 316
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 58 104 119 277 223 84 415 1983 76 165 1538 316
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 58 104 119 277 223 84 415 1983 76 165 1538 316
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 0.99 0.92 0.88 0.98 0.90
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.88 0.12 1.00 2.45 0.55
Final Sat.: 1663 1900 1488 1663 1900 1488 1663 5439 208 1663 4544 934
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.05 0.08 0.17 0.12 0.06 0.25 0.36 0.36 0.10 0.34 0.34
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.6 10.4 10.4 21.6 21.3 21.3 32.3 59.8 59.8 16.3 43.8 43.8
Volume/Cap: 0.40 0.63 0.93 0.93 0.66 0.32 0.93 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.93 0.93
Delay/Veh: 53.4 60.9 111.9 82.0 50.8 43.7 68.2 24.8 24.8 61.3 44.7 44.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 53.4 60.9 111.9 82.0 50.8 43.7 68.2 24.8 24.8 61.3 44.7 44.7
LOS by Move: D-E F F D D E C C E D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 3 5 8 15 9 3 20 21 21 6 21 21
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 1 0
Lane Group: L T R L T R L RT RT L RT RT
#LnsInGrps: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 3 3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx 0.99 0.99 xxxx 0.98 0.98
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.98 0.98
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 0.99 0.92 0.88 0.98 0.90
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-171
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #131 Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 10.6 10.4 10.4 21.6 21.3 21.3 32.3 59.8 59.8 16.3 43.8 43.8
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 2.0 3.4 4.3 9.9 6.9 2.6 14.6 18.1 18.1 5.7 20.1 20.1
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.99 0.99
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.12
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.04 0.08 0.08
Q2: 0.6 1.5 3.4 4.8 1.7 0.5 5.6 2.5 2.5 0.1 0.9 0.9
HCM2KQueue: 2.6 4.8 7.7 14.7 8.7 3.1 20.2 20.6 20.6 5.8 21.0 21.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.19 1.16 1.16
HCM2k70thQ: 3.1 5.7 9.1 17.2 10.2 3.7 23.5 23.9 23.9 6.9 24.3 24.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.58 1.56 1.53 1.48 1.52 1.57 1.45 1.45 1.45 1.55 1.45 1.45
HCM2k85thQ: 4.1 7.5 11.8 21.8 13.2 4.9 29.4 29.9 29.9 9.0 30.4 30.4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.75 1.71 1.67 1.59 1.66 1.74 1.55 1.54 1.54 1.70 1.54 1.54
HCM2k90thQ: 4.6 8.2 12.9 23.4 14.4 5.4 31.3 31.8 31.8 9.9 32.3 32.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 2.02 1.96 1.89 1.77 1.87 2.00 1.69 1.69 1.69 1.93 1.69 1.69
HCM2k95thQ: 5.3 9.4 14.6 26.0 16.2 6.2 34.3 34.9 34.9 11.3 35.4 35.4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.52 2.39 2.25 2.02 2.21 2.49 1.91 1.90 1.90 2.34 1.90 1.90
HCM2k98thQ: 6.6 11.5 17.4 29.7 19.2 7.7 38.7 39.3 39.3 13.7 39.8 39.8
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #131 Blaney Ave and Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 13.7 25.1 29.5 68.2 51.9 18.3 101.1 391 15.0 39.6 369 75.8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 229.538 pounds
37.185 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 716.159 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 58.892 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 11.616 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.823 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 229.538 pounds
37.185 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 716.159 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 58.892 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 11.616 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 1.823 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-172
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #1030: Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:163 447***498
Lanes:1 0 1 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
57 1
Cycle Time (sec):100
1 220
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
109*** 1 Critical V/C:0.431 1 151
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):24.7 0
12 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):25.2 1 134***
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:10***254 107
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Foothill Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 10 254 99 480 447 162 56 61 12 122 69 189
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 10 254 99 480 447 162 56 61 12 122 69 189
Added Vol: 0 0 8 18 0 1 1 48 0 12 82 31
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 10 254 107 498 447 163 57 109 12 134 151 220
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 10 254 107 498 447 163 57 109 12 134 151 220
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 10 254 107 498 447 163 57 109 12 134 151 220
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 10 254 107 498 447 163 57 109 12 134 151 220
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 0.96 0.88 0.79 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78
Lanes: 1.00 1.37 0.63 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1663 2493 1050 2992 1900 1488 1663 1900 1488 1663 1900 1488
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.17 0.24 0.11 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.08 0.08 0.15
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 7.0 22.0 22.0 36.0 51.1 63.4 12.3 12.5 19.5 17.5 17.6 53.6
Volume/Cap: 0.09 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.17 0.28 0.46 0.04 0.46 0.45 0.28
Delay/Veh: 43.8 34.3 34.3 24.9 16.0 7.6 40.5 42.1 32.8 38.2 37.8 12.8
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 43.8 34.3 34.3 24.9 16.0 7.6 40.5 42.1 32.8 38.2 37.8 12.8
LOS by Move: D C-C-C B A D D C-D+ D+ B
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 5 5 7 9 2 2 4 0 4 4 4
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L T R
#LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 0.96 0.96 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 0.96 0.88 0.79 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-173
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1030 Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 7.0 22.0 22.0 36.0 51.1 63.4 12.3 12.5 19.5 17.5 17.6 53.6
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 0.3 4.5 4.5 6.4 7.9 2.0 1.6 2.8 0.3 3.6 3.8 3.6
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.20
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.99 0.99
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 0.38 0.67
Q2: 0.1 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.3
HCM2KQueue: 0.4 5.3 5.3 7.2 8.8 2.2 1.9 3.6 0.3 3.9 4.1 3.9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.19 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.19
HCM2k70thQ: 0.5 6.3 6.3 8.6 10.4 2.7 2.3 4.3 0.4 4.7 4.8 4.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.60 1.55 1.55 1.54 1.52 1.58 1.58 1.57 1.60 1.56 1.56 1.56
HCM2k85thQ: 0.6 8.2 8.2 11.1 13.4 3.5 3.1 5.7 0.5 6.1 6.3 6.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.79 1.71 1.71 1.68 1.66 1.76 1.76 1.73 1.79 1.73 1.73 1.73
HCM2k90thQ: 0.7 9.0 9.0 12.2 14.6 3.9 3.4 6.3 0.6 6.8 7.0 6.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 2.09 1.95 1.95 1.90 1.87 2.03 2.04 1.99 2.09 1.98 1.98 1.98
HCM2k95thQ: 0.8 10.3 10.3 13.8 16.4 4.5 4.0 7.2 0.7 7.8 8.0 7.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.67 2.37 2.37 2.27 2.21 2.54 2.56 2.46 2.67 2.44 2.43 2.44
HCM2k98thQ: 1.0 12.5 12.5 16.5 19.4 5.7 5.0 8.9 0.9 9.6 9.9 9.4
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1030 Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 2.3 55.1 23.2 95.6 71.5 16.8 12.9 25.3 2.4 30.1 33.8 29.9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 64.424 pounds
10.437 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 201.001 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 15.791 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 2.890 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.567 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 64.424 pounds
10.437 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 201.001 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 15.791 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 2.890 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.567 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-174
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #1030: Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:162 447***488
Lanes:1 0 1 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
56 1
Cycle Time (sec):100
1 202
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
113*** 1 Critical V/C:0.428 1 161
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):24.7 0
12 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):25.2 1 134***
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:10***254 107
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Foothill Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 10 254 99 480 447 162 56 61 12 122 69 189
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 10 254 99 480 447 162 56 61 12 122 69 189
Added Vol: 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 52 0 12 92 13
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 10 254 107 488 447 162 56 113 12 134 161 202
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 10 254 107 488 447 162 56 113 12 134 161 202
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 10 254 107 488 447 162 56 113 12 134 161 202
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 10 254 107 488 447 162 56 113 12 134 161 202
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.39 0.61 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 2603 1096 3150 1900 1750 1750 1900 1750 1750 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.24 0.09 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.08 0.08 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 7.0 22.9 22.9 35.4 51.3 63.5 12.2 13.0 20.0 16.7 17.5 52.9
Volume/Cap: 0.08 0.43 0.43 0.44 0.46 0.15 0.26 0.46 0.03 0.46 0.49 0.22
Delay/Veh: 43.8 33.3 33.3 24.9 15.8 7.4 40.5 41.6 32.3 38.7 38.3 12.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 43.8 33.3 33.3 24.9 15.8 7.4 40.5 41.6 32.3 38.7 38.3 12.7
LOS by Move: D C-C-C B A D D C-D+ D+ B
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 5 5 7 9 2 2 4 0 4 4 3
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-175
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #1030: Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:163 447***507
Lanes:1 0 1 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
57 1
Cycle Time (sec):100
1 236
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
148*** 1 Critical V/C:0.457 1 216
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):26.5 0
13 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):26.6 1 138***
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:10***254 109
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Foothill Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 10 254 99 480 447 162 56 61 12 122 69 189
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 10 254 99 480 447 162 56 61 12 122 69 189
Added Vol: 0 0 10 27 0 1 1 87 1 16 147 47
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 10 254 109 507 447 163 57 148 13 138 216 236
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 10 254 109 507 447 163 57 148 13 138 216 236
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 10 254 109 507 447 163 57 148 13 138 216 236
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 10 254 109 507 447 163 57 148 13 138 216 236
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 0.96 0.88 0.79 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78
Lanes: 1.00 1.36 0.64 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1663 2476 1062 2992 1900 1488 1663 1900 1488 1663 1900 1488
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.17 0.24 0.11 0.03 0.08 0.01 0.08 0.11 0.16
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 7.0 20.8 20.8 34.3 48.1 60.6 12.5 15.9 22.9 17.0 20.4 54.7
Volume/Cap: 0.09 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.18 0.27 0.49 0.04 0.49 0.56 0.29
Delay/Veh: 43.8 35.5 35.5 26.3 18.0 8.8 40.3 39.6 30.0 38.9 37.6 12.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 43.8 35.5 35.5 26.3 18.0 8.8 40.3 39.6 30.0 38.9 37.6 12.4
LOS by Move: D D+ D+ C B-A D D C D+ D+ B
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 6 6 8 9 2 2 5 0 4 6 4
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L T R
#LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 0.96 0.96 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 0.96 0.88 0.79 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-176
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1030 Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 7.0 20.8 20.8 34.3 48.1 60.6 12.5 15.9 22.9 17.0 20.4 54.7
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 0.3 4.6 4.6 6.7 8.4 2.2 1.6 3.7 0.3 3.8 5.4 3.8
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.27
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.97 0.97
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.35 0.40 0.66
Q2: 0.1 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.2 0.4 0.9 0.0 0.3 0.5 0.3
HCM2KQueue: 0.4 5.5 5.5 7.7 9.4 2.4 1.9 4.7 0.3 4.1 5.9 4.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.19 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.19
HCM2k70thQ: 0.5 6.5 6.5 9.1 11.0 2.9 2.3 5.5 0.4 4.9 7.0 4.9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.60 1.55 1.55 1.53 1.52 1.58 1.58 1.56 1.60 1.56 1.55 1.56
HCM2k85thQ: 0.6 8.5 8.5 11.8 14.2 3.8 3.0 7.3 0.5 6.4 9.1 6.4
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.79 1.70 1.70 1.67 1.65 1.75 1.76 1.72 1.79 1.73 1.70 1.73
HCM2k90thQ: 0.7 9.4 9.4 12.8 15.5 4.2 3.4 8.0 0.6 7.1 10.0 7.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 2.09 1.94 1.94 1.89 1.86 2.03 2.04 1.96 2.09 1.98 1.93 1.98
HCM2k95thQ: 0.8 10.7 10.7 14.5 17.4 4.8 3.9 9.2 0.7 8.1 11.4 8.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.67 2.35 2.35 2.25 2.19 2.53 2.56 2.40 2.67 2.43 2.34 2.43
HCM2k98thQ: 1.0 13.0 13.0 17.3 20.5 6.1 4.9 11.2 0.9 10.0 13.8 10.0
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1030 Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 2.3 56.1 24.1 100.2 75.8 18.0 12.9 33.7 2.5 31.2 48.5 31.8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 70.828 pounds
11.474 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 220.983 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 17.445 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 3.218 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.619 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 70.828 pounds
11.474 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 220.983 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 17.445 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 3.218 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.619 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-177
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #1030: Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:163 447***507
Lanes:1 0 1 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
57*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):100
1 236
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
158 1 Critical V/C:0.455 1 237***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):25.1 0
13 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):26.3 1 138
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:10***254 109
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Foothill Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 10 254 99 480 447 162 56 61 12 122 69 189
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 10 254 99 480 447 162 56 61 12 122 69 189
Added Vol: 0 0 10 27 0 1 1 97 1 16 168 47
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 10 254 109 507 447 163 57 158 13 138 237 236
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 10 254 109 507 447 163 57 158 13 138 237 236
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 10 254 109 507 447 163 57 158 13 138 237 236
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 10 254 109 507 447 163 57 158 13 138 237 236
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 0.96 0.88 0.79 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78
Lanes: 1.00 1.36 0.64 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1663 2476 1062 2992 1900 1488 1663 1900 1488 1663 1900 1488
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.10 0.10 0.17 0.24 0.11 0.03 0.08 0.01 0.08 0.12 0.16
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 7.0 20.9 20.9 34.5 48.3 55.4 7.0 17.9 24.9 14.8 25.6 60.1
Volume/Cap: 0.09 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.20 0.49 0.47 0.04 0.56 0.49 0.26
Delay/Veh: 43.8 35.4 35.4 26.2 17.9 11.3 47.9 37.8 28.5 42.5 32.4 9.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 43.8 35.4 35.4 26.2 17.9 11.3 47.9 37.8 28.5 42.5 32.4 9.6
LOS by Move: D D+ D+ C B B+ D D+ C D C-A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 5 5 8 9 3 3 5 0 4 6 4
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT L T R L T R L T R
#LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 0.96 0.96 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.96 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 0.96 0.88 0.79 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78 0.88 1.00 0.78
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-178
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1030 Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 7.0 20.9 20.9 34.5 48.3 55.4 7.0 17.9 24.9 14.8 25.6 60.1
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 0.3 4.6 4.6 6.7 8.4 2.5 1.7 3.9 0.3 3.9 5.6 3.4
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.30 0.30
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.96 0.96
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.32 0.46 0.69
Q2: 0.1 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.2 0.9 0.8 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.2
HCM2KQueue: 0.4 5.5 5.5 7.6 9.3 2.7 2.5 4.8 0.3 4.3 6.0 3.6
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.19
HCM2k70thQ: 0.5 6.5 6.5 9.0 11.0 3.2 3.0 5.7 0.4 5.1 7.1 4.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.60 1.55 1.55 1.53 1.52 1.57 1.58 1.56 1.60 1.56 1.55 1.57
HCM2k85thQ: 0.6 8.5 8.5 11.7 14.2 4.3 4.0 7.4 0.5 6.7 9.3 5.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.79 1.70 1.70 1.67 1.65 1.75 1.75 1.72 1.79 1.72 1.70 1.73
HCM2k90thQ: 0.7 9.4 9.4 12.8 15.4 4.7 4.4 8.2 0.6 7.3 10.2 6.3
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 2.09 1.94 1.94 1.89 1.86 2.02 2.02 1.96 2.09 1.97 1.93 1.99
HCM2k95thQ: 0.8 10.7 10.7 14.5 17.3 5.5 5.1 9.4 0.7 8.4 11.6 7.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.67 2.36 2.36 2.26 2.19 2.51 2.52 2.39 2.67 2.42 2.33 2.46
HCM2k98thQ: 1.0 12.9 12.9 17.2 20.4 6.8 6.3 11.4 0.9 10.3 14.0 8.9
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1030 Foothill Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 2.3 56.0 24.0 100.0 75.5 20.4 13.7 35.4 2.5 32.0 50.3 28.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 71.288 pounds
11.549 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 222.419 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 17.542 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 3.231 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.624 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 71.288 pounds
11.549 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 222.419 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 17.542 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 3.231 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.624 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-179
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM
Intersection #1031: Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:118 484 345***
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
146 1
Cycle Time (sec):90
1 85
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
514*** 0 Critical V/C:0.801 1 364
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):40.2 0
113 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):35.6 1 126***
LOS:D+
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:103 152***80
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd McClellan Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 103 146 68 319 465 118 146 514 113 106 364 65
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 103 146 68 319 465 118 146 514 113 106 364 65
Added Vol: 0 6 12 26 19 0 0 0 0 20 0 20
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 103 152 80 345 484 118 146 514 113 126 364 85
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 103 152 80 345 484 118 146 514 113 126 364 85
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 103 152 80 345 484 118 146 514 113 126 364 85
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 103 152 80 345 484 118 146 514 113 126 364 85
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 0.95 0.87 0.88 0.97 0.89 0.88 0.97 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.78
Lanes: 1.00 1.27 0.73 1.00 1.58 0.42 1.00 0.81 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1663 2292 1207 1663 2918 711 1663 1492 328 1663 1900 1488
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.21 0.17 0.17 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.08 0.19 0.06
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.4 10.0 10.0 22.5 22.1 22.1 14.3 37.3 37.3 8.2 31.2 31.2
Volume/Cap: 0.54 0.60 0.60 0.83 0.68 0.68 0.55 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.55 0.16
Delay/Veh: 40.6 40.6 40.6 45.2 32.8 32.8 37.4 31.3 31.3 70.6 24.8 20.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 40.6 40.6 40.6 45.2 32.8 32.8 37.4 31.3 31.3 70.6 24.8 20.5
LOS by Move: D D D D C-C-D+ C C E C C+
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 4 4 12 9 9 4 17 17 6 9 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT L RT RT L RT RT L T R
#LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 0.95 0.95 xxxx 0.97 0.97 xxxx 0.97 0.97 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.85
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 0.95 0.87 0.88 0.97 0.89 0.88 0.97 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.78
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-180
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1031 Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 10.4 10.0 10.0 22.5 22.1 22.1 14.3 37.3 37.3 8.2 31.2 31.2
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 2.6 2.8 2.8 8.9 6.9 6.9 3.7 14.2 14.2 3.4 7.4 1.6
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.59 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2: 1.1 1.3 1.3 3.6 1.9 1.9 0.4 2.5 2.5 2.7 1.2 0.2
HCM2KQueue: 3.7 4.2 4.2 12.4 8.8 8.8 4.0 16.7 16.7 6.1 8.5 1.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.17 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.17 1.17 1.19 1.18 1.20
HCM2k70thQ: 4.4 4.9 4.9 14.6 10.4 10.4 4.8 19.5 19.5 7.2 10.1 2.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.57 1.56 1.56 1.50 1.52 1.52 1.56 1.47 1.47 1.54 1.53 1.58
HCM2k85thQ: 5.8 6.5 6.5 18.6 13.4 13.4 6.3 24.6 24.6 9.4 13.0 2.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.73 1.73 1.73 1.61 1.66 1.66 1.73 1.57 1.57 1.69 1.66 1.77
HCM2k90thQ: 6.4 7.2 7.2 20.1 14.6 14.6 7.0 26.3 26.3 10.4 14.2 3.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.99 1.98 1.98 1.80 1.87 1.87 1.98 1.74 1.74 1.93 1.87 2.04
HCM2k95thQ: 7.4 8.2 8.2 22.4 16.4 16.4 8.0 29.0 29.0 11.8 16.0 3.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.45 2.43 2.43 2.08 2.21 2.21 2.43 1.98 1.98 2.33 2.22 2.57
HCM2k98thQ: 9.1 10.1 10.1 25.9 19.4 19.4 9.8 33.0 33.0 14.2 19.0 4.6
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1031 Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 24.3 36.2 19.0 81.6 109 26.7 33.7 115 25.2 31.0 73.5 14.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 98.499 pounds
15.957 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 307.318 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 24.873 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 4.770 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.827 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 98.499 pounds
15.957 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 307.318 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 24.873 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 4.770 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.827 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design Future Volume Alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-181
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
General Plan A PM
Intersection #1031: Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:118 484 333***
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
146 1
Cycle Time (sec):90
1 77
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
514*** 0 Critical V/C:0.776 1 364
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):38.0 0
113 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):34.5 1 126***
LOS:C-
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:103 152***78
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd McClellan Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 103 146 68 319 465 118 146 514 113 106 364 65
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 103 146 68 319 465 118 146 514 113 106 364 65
Added Vol: 0 6 10 14 19 0 0 0 0 20 0 12
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 103 152 78 333 484 118 146 514 113 126 364 77
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 103 152 78 333 484 118 146 514 113 126 364 77
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 103 152 78 333 484 118 146 514 113 126 364 77
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 103 152 78 333 484 118 146 514 113 126 364 77
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.98 0.95 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.30 0.70 1.00 1.60 0.40 1.00 0.82 0.18 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 2444 1254 1750 2974 725 1750 1476 324 1750 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.19 0.16 0.16 0.08 0.35 0.35 0.07 0.19 0.04
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.1 10.0 10.0 21.2 21.1 21.1 14.2 38.8 38.8 8.0 32.6 32.6
Volume/Cap: 0.53 0.56 0.56 0.81 0.69 0.69 0.53 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.53 0.12
Delay/Veh: 40.3 39.7 39.7 43.8 33.9 33.9 36.8 28.7 28.7 66.2 23.4 19.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 40.3 39.7 39.7 43.8 33.9 33.9 36.8 28.7 28.7 66.2 23.4 19.2
LOS by Move: D D D D C-C-D+ C C E C B-
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 4 4 12 9 9 4 17 17 6 8 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-182
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
General Plan B PM
Intersection #1031: Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:118 486 344***
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
146 1
Cycle Time (sec):90
1 85
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
515*** 0 Critical V/C:0.803 1 364
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):40.6 0
113 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):35.8 1 131***
LOS:D+
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:103 150***78
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd McClellan Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 103 146 68 319 465 118 146 514 113 106 364 65
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 103 146 68 319 465 118 146 514 113 106 364 65
Added Vol: 0 4 10 25 21 0 0 1 0 25 0 20
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 103 150 78 344 486 118 146 515 113 131 364 85
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 103 150 78 344 486 118 146 515 113 131 364 85
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 103 150 78 344 486 118 146 515 113 131 364 85
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 103 150 78 344 486 118 146 515 113 131 364 85
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 0.95 0.87 0.88 0.97 0.89 0.88 0.97 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.78
Lanes: 1.00 1.28 0.72 1.00 1.58 0.42 1.00 0.81 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1663 2305 1199 1663 2920 709 1663 1493 328 1663 1900 1488
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.21 0.17 0.17 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.08 0.19 0.06
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.3 10.0 10.0 22.3 22.0 22.0 14.4 37.2 37.2 8.5 31.3 31.3
Volume/Cap: 0.54 0.59 0.59 0.83 0.68 0.68 0.55 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.55 0.16
Delay/Veh: 40.8 40.3 40.3 45.8 33.0 33.0 37.3 31.7 31.7 70.3 24.7 20.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 40.8 40.3 40.3 45.8 33.0 33.0 37.3 31.7 31.7 70.3 24.7 20.4
LOS by Move: D D D D C-C-D+ C C E C C+
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 4 4 12 9 9 4 17 17 6 9 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT L RT RT L RT RT L T R
#LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 0.95 0.95 xxxx 0.97 0.97 xxxx 0.97 0.97 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.85
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 0.95 0.87 0.88 0.97 0.89 0.88 0.97 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.78
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-183
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1031 Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 10.3 10.0 10.0 22.3 22.0 22.0 14.4 37.2 37.2 8.5 31.3 31.3
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 2.6 2.8 2.8 8.9 7.0 7.0 3.7 14.3 14.3 3.5 7.3 1.6
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.59 0.59 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2: 1.1 1.3 1.3 3.6 1.9 1.9 0.4 2.6 2.6 2.8 1.2 0.2
HCM2KQueue: 3.7 4.0 4.0 12.5 8.9 8.9 4.0 16.8 16.8 6.3 8.5 1.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.17 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.17 1.17 1.19 1.18 1.20
HCM2k70thQ: 4.4 4.8 4.8 14.6 10.5 10.5 4.8 19.6 19.6 7.5 10.1 2.1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.50 1.52 1.52 1.56 1.47 1.47 1.54 1.53 1.58
HCM2k85thQ: 5.8 6.3 6.3 18.7 13.5 13.5 6.3 24.8 24.8 9.7 13.0 2.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.73 1.73 1.73 1.61 1.66 1.66 1.73 1.57 1.57 1.69 1.66 1.77
HCM2k90thQ: 6.4 7.0 7.0 20.1 14.7 14.7 7.0 26.5 26.5 10.7 14.2 3.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.99 1.98 1.98 1.80 1.87 1.87 1.98 1.74 1.74 1.92 1.87 2.04
HCM2k95thQ: 7.4 8.0 8.0 22.5 16.6 16.6 8.0 29.2 29.2 12.1 16.0 3.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.45 2.43 2.43 2.08 2.21 2.21 2.43 1.97 1.97 2.32 2.22 2.57
HCM2k98thQ: 9.1 9.9 9.9 26.0 19.6 19.6 9.8 33.2 33.2 14.6 18.9 4.6
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1031 Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 24.3 35.7 18.5 81.6 110 26.7 33.6 115 25.3 32.2 73.4 14.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 99.012 pounds
16.040 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 308.916 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 25.015 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 4.801 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.830 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 99.012 pounds
16.040 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 308.916 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 25.015 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 4.801 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.830 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-184
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (alternative)
GP Project PM
Intersection #1031: Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:118 492 348***
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
146 1
Cycle Time (sec):90
1 87
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
515*** 0 Critical V/C:0.815 1 364
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):42.0 0
113 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):36.6 1 142***
LOS:D+
Lanes:1 0 1 1 0
Final Vol:103 152***82
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Stelling Rd McClellan Rd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 103 146 68 319 465 118 146 514 113 106 364 65
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 103 146 68 319 465 118 146 514 113 106 364 65
Added Vol: 0 6 14 29 27 0 0 1 0 36 0 22
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 103 152 82 348 492 118 146 515 113 142 364 87
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 103 152 82 348 492 118 146 515 113 142 364 87
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 103 152 82 348 492 118 146 515 113 142 364 87
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 103 152 82 348 492 118 146 515 113 142 364 87
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.88 0.95 0.87 0.88 0.97 0.89 0.88 0.97 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.78
Lanes: 1.00 1.26 0.74 1.00 1.59 0.41 1.00 0.81 0.19 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1663 2272 1226 1663 2927 702 1663 1493 328 1663 1900 1488
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.21 0.17 0.17 0.09 0.34 0.34 0.09 0.19 0.06
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.2 10.0 10.0 22.3 22.0 22.0 14.4 36.7 36.7 9.1 31.4 31.4
Volume/Cap: 0.55 0.60 0.60 0.85 0.69 0.69 0.55 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.55 0.17
Delay/Veh: 41.0 40.8 40.8 47.2 33.1 33.1 37.3 33.1 33.1 70.7 24.6 20.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.0 40.8 40.8 47.2 33.1 33.1 37.3 33.1 33.1 70.7 24.6 20.4
LOS by Move: D D D D C-C-D+ C-C-E C C+
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 4 4 13 9 9 4 17 17 7 9 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Adjusted Lane Utilization Module:
Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
Lane Group: L RT RT L RT RT L RT RT L T R
#LnsInGrps: 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Input Saturation Adj Module:
Lane Width: 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12
CrsswalkWid: 8 8 8 8
% Hev Veh: 0 0 0 0
Grade: 0% 0% 0% 0%
Parking/Hr: No No No No
Bus Stp/Hr: 0 0 0 0
Area Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < Other > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Cnft Ped/Hr: 0 0 0 0
ExclusiveRT: Include Include Include Include
% RT Prtct: 0 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops f(lt) Adj Case Module:
f(lt) Case: 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx 1 xxxx xxxx
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
HCM Ops Saturation Adj Module:
Ln Wid Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hev Veh Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Grade Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Bus Stp Adj: xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx 1.00 1.00 xxxx xxxx 1.00
Area Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
RT Adj: xxxx 0.95 0.95 xxxx 0.97 0.97 xxxx 0.97 0.97 xxxx xxxx 0.85
LT Adj: 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx 0.95 xxxx xxxxx
PedBike Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
HCM Sat Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.97 0.95 0.97 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.85
Usr Sat Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Sat Adj: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Fnl Sat Adj: 0.88 0.95 0.87 0.88 0.97 0.89 0.88 0.97 0.90 0.88 1.00 0.78
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Delay Adjustment Factor Module:
Coordinated: < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < No > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Signal Type: < < < < < < < < < < < < Actuated > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
COMPARE Fri Jun 06 10:40:06 2014 Page 231-185
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
DelAdjFctr: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Level Of Service Detailed Computation Report (HCM2000 Queue Method)
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1031 Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Green Time: 10.2 10.0 10.0 22.3 22.0 22.0 14.4 36.7 36.7 9.1 31.4 31.4
ArrivalType: 3 3 3 3
ProgFactor: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q1: 2.6 2.9 2.9 9.0 7.0 7.0 3.7 14.4 14.4 3.8 7.3 1.6
UpstreamVC: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
UpstreamAdj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
EarlyArrAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.58 0.58 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2: 1.1 1.3 1.3 3.8 2.0 2.0 0.4 2.7 2.7 3.0 1.2 0.2
HCM2KQueue: 3.7 4.2 4.2 12.8 9.0 9.0 4.0 17.1 17.1 6.8 8.5 1.8
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
70th%Factor: 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.17 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.17 1.17 1.18 1.18 1.20
HCM2k70thQ: 4.5 5.0 5.0 15.0 10.6 10.6 4.8 20.0 20.0 8.0 10.1 2.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
85th%Factor: 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.50 1.52 1.52 1.56 1.47 1.47 1.54 1.53 1.58
HCM2k85thQ: 5.9 6.6 6.6 19.2 13.7 13.7 6.3 25.2 25.2 10.4 13.0 2.9
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
90th%Factor: 1.73 1.72 1.72 1.61 1.66 1.66 1.73 1.57 1.57 1.69 1.66 1.76
HCM2k90thQ: 6.5 7.2 7.2 20.6 14.9 14.9 7.0 26.9 26.9 11.4 14.1 3.2
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
95th%Factor: 1.99 1.98 1.98 1.79 1.86 1.86 1.98 1.73 1.73 1.91 1.87 2.04
HCM2k95thQ: 7.4 8.3 8.3 23.0 16.8 16.8 8.0 29.7 29.7 12.9 16.0 3.7
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
98th%Factor: 2.45 2.42 2.42 2.07 2.20 2.20 2.43 1.97 1.97 2.29 2.22 2.57
HCM2k98thQ: 9.2 10.2 10.2 26.6 19.8 19.8 9.8 33.7 33.7 15.5 18.9 4.7
Fuel Consumption and Emissions
2000 HCM Operations Method
Future Volume Alternative
********************************************************************************
Intersection #1031 Stelling Rd & McClellan Rd
********************************************************************************
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Run Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
NumOfStops: 24.3 36.2 19.5 82.8 112 26.8 33.6 116 25.6 34.9 73.3 15.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 1995 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 101.513 pounds
16.445 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 316.722 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 25.691 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 4.945 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.847 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name: year 2000 composite fleet
Fuel Consumption: 101.513 pounds
16.445 gallons
Carbon Dioxide: 316.722 pounds
Carbon Monoxide: 25.691 pounds
Hydrocarbons: 4.945 pounds
Nitrogen Oxides: 0.847 pounds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER
The fuel consumption and emissions measures should be used with
caution and only for comparisons of different signal timings, geometric
design alternatives or for general planning applications, as these
calculations are applied to the analysis of a single intersection within the
CCG and TRAFFIX. Network models are more appropriate since they can
account for the influence of the adjacent control measures and other system
elements.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:02:00 2014 Page 85-3
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM Mitigation
Intersection #2: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:47 84***4
Lanes:0 0 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
917*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1734 3 Critical V/C:0.782 3 727***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):48.3 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):36.4 0 0
LOS:D+
Lanes:1 1 0 0 1
Final Vol:503 49 439***
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 NB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 441 49 364 4 71 29 771 1335 0 0 602 551
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 441 49 364 4 71 29 771 1335 0 0 602 551
Added Vol: 62 0 56 0 0 0 146 326 0 0 77 154
App+Div: 0 0 19 0 13 18 0 73 0 0 48 37
Initial Fut: 503 49 439 4 84 47 917 1734 0 0 727 742
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 503 49 439 4 84 47 917 1734 0 0 727 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 503 49 439 4 84 47 917 1734 0 0 727 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 503 49 439 4 84 47 917 1734 0 0 727 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.84 0.16 1.00 0.06 1.21 0.73 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3212 313 1750 109 2290 1281 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.16 0.25 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.29 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00
Crit Moves: ******** **** ****
Green Time: 38.2 38.2 38.2 10.0 10.0 10.0 44.4 63.8 0.0 0.0 19.4 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.51 0.51 0.81 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.81 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00
Delay/Veh: 35.6 35.6 48.8 55.5 55.5 55.5 40.7 21.3 0.0 0.0 56.3 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 35.6 35.6 48.8 55.5 55.5 55.5 40.7 21.3 0.0 0.0 56.3 0.0
LOS by Move: D+ D+ D E+ E+ E+ D C+ A A E+ A
HCM2kAvgQ: 9 9 19 3 3 3 19 15 0 0 9 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:02:00 2014 Page 85-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM Mitigation
Intersection #2: Stevens Creek Blvd and SR-85 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:47 84***4
Lanes:0 0 1 1 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
931*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1773 3 Critical V/C:0.811 3 753***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):50.6 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):37.9 0 0
LOS:D+
Lanes:1 1 0 0 1
Final Vol:515 49 469***
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: SR-85 NB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 441 49 364 4 71 29 771 1335 0 0 602 551
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 441 49 364 4 71 29 771 1335 0 0 602 551
Added Vol: 74 0 86 0 0 0 160 365 0 0 103 168
App+Div: 0 0 19 0 13 18 0 73 0 0 48 37
Initial Fut: 515 49 469 4 84 47 931 1773 0 0 753 756
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 515 49 469 4 84 47 931 1773 0 0 753 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 515 49 469 4 84 47 931 1773 0 0 753 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 515 49 469 4 84 47 931 1773 0 0 753 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.84 0.16 1.00 0.06 1.21 0.73 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3218 306 1750 109 2290 1281 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.16 0.27 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.30 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 39.3 39.3 39.3 10.0 10.0 10.0 43.3 62.7 0.0 0.0 19.4 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.51 0.51 0.85 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.85 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.85 0.00
Delay/Veh: 34.8 34.8 51.0 55.5 55.5 55.5 43.4 22.4 0.0 0.0 58.4 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 34.8 34.8 51.0 55.5 55.5 55.5 43.4 22.4 0.0 0.0 58.4 0.0
LOS by Move: C-C-D-E+ E+ E+ D C+ A A E+ A
HCM2kAvgQ: 10 10 20 3 3 3 20 15 0 0 9 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:02:00 2014 Page 85-10
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM Mitigation
Intersection #5: Homestead Road and De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:130 1569***240
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
408*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 423
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
556 2 Critical V/C:0.886 1 560***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):53.3 0
515 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):48.0 2 513
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:409***1844 172
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
Added Vol: 75 103 94 87 177 20 31 79 117 45 15 21
App+Div: 38 120 20 8 106 19 20 17 55 24 20 2
Initial Fut: 409 1844 172 240 1569 130 408 556 515 513 560 423
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 409 1844 172 240 1569 130 408 556 515 513 560 423
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 409 1844 172 240 1569 130 408 556 515 513 560 423
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 409 1844 172 240 1569 130 408 556 515 513 560 423
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.12 0.88
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2107 1591
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.32 0.10 0.08 0.28 0.07 0.13 0.15 0.29 0.16 0.27 0.27
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 18.2 45.9 73.4 10.8 38.5 38.5 18.1 27.8 46.0 27.5 37.2 37.2
Volume/Cap: 0.89 0.87 0.17 0.87 0.89 0.24 0.89 0.65 0.79 0.73 0.89 0.89
Delay/Veh: 70.2 40.8 11.5 81.1 46.5 32.1 70.3 45.5 41.5 48.9 50.2 50.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 70.2 40.8 11.5 81.1 46.5 32.1 70.3 45.5 41.5 48.9 50.2 50.2
LOS by Move: E D B+ F D C-E D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 10 22 3 8 22 4 12 10 20 12 21 21
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:02:00 2014 Page 85-11
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM Mitigation
Intersection #5: Homestead Road and De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:140 1710***263
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
421 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 463
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
597 2 Critical V/C:0.948 1 580
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):61.1 0
586*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):55.6 2 696***
LOS:E+
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:446***1896 262
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
Added Vol: 112 155 184 110 318 30 44 120 188 228 35 61
App+Div: 38 120 20 8 106 19 20 17 55 24 20 2
Initial Fut: 446 1896 262 263 1710 140 421 597 586 696 580 463
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 446 1896 262 263 1710 140 421 597 586 696 580 463
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 446 1896 262 263 1710 140 421 597 586 696 580 463
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 446 1896 262 263 1710 140 421 597 586 696 580 463
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.07 0.93
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2036 1625
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.33 0.15 0.08 0.30 0.08 0.13 0.16 0.33 0.22 0.28 0.28
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 18.5 46.2 75.1 11.6 39.3 39.3 17.3 25.3 43.8 28.9 36.9 36.9
Volume/Cap: 0.95 0.89 0.25 0.89 0.95 0.25 0.96 0.77 0.95 0.95 0.96 0.96
Delay/Veh: 80.9 41.9 11.5 82.6 52.6 31.7 85.1 51.4 62.9 68.1 60.7 60.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 80.9 41.9 11.5 82.6 52.6 31.7 85.1 51.4 62.9 68.1 60.7 60.7
LOS by Move: F D B+ F D-C F D-E E E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 23 5 9 26 4 14 12 28 20 25 25
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:02:00 2014 Page 85-12
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM Mitigation
Intersection #5: Homestead Road and De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:150 1776***279
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
434 2
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 486
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
618 2 Critical V/C:1.018 1 587
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):78.3 0
643*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):64.7 2 758***
LOS:E
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:486***1920 277
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 296 1621 58 145 1286 91 357 460 343 444 525 400
Added Vol: 152 179 199 126 384 40 57 141 245 290 42 84
App+Div: 38 120 20 8 106 19 20 17 55 24 20 2
Initial Fut: 486 1920 277 279 1776 150 434 618 643 758 587 486
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 486 1920 277 279 1776 150 434 618 643 758 587 486
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 486 1920 277 279 1776 150 434 618 643 758 587 486
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 486 1920 277 279 1776 150 434 618 643 758 587 486
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.05 0.95
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2001 1657
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.34 0.16 0.09 0.31 0.09 0.14 0.16 0.37 0.24 0.29 0.29
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 18.8 44.9 74.2 11.8 37.9 37.9 17.7 26.0 44.7 29.3 37.6 37.6
Volume/Cap: 1.02 0.93 0.26 0.93 1.02 0.28 0.97 0.78 1.02 1.02 0.97 0.97
Delay/Veh: 98.5 46.2 12.0 89.7 69.2 32.9 86.9 51.2 80.1 85.0 62.1 62.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 98.5 46.2 12.0 89.7 69.2 32.9 86.9 51.2 80.1 85.0 62.1 62.1
LOS by Move: F D B F E C-F D-F F E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 13 24 5 10 30 5 14 13 34 24 26 26
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:02:00 2014 Page 85-15
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM Mitigation
Intersection #6: De Anza Blvd and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2149***0
Lanes:1 0 5 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 712
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.110 1!7***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):101.1 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):64.3 1 1273
LOS:E
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:733***1928 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 418 1446 0 0 1575 538 0 0 0 850 7 582
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 418 1446 0 0 1575 538 0 0 0 850 7 582
Added Vol: 303 398 0 0 406 329 0 0 0 406 0 53
App+Div: 12 84 0 0 168 11 0 0 0 17 0 77
Initial Fut: 733 1928 0 0 2149 878 0 0 0 1273 7 712
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 733 1928 0 0 2149 0 0 0 0 1273 7 712
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 733 1928 0 0 2149 0 0 0 0 1273 7 712
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 733 1928 0 0 2149 0 0 0 0 1273 7 712
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.64 0.01 1.35
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 9500 1750 0 0 0 2865 12 2374
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.57 0.30
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 26.0 51.3 0.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.7 63.7 63.7
Volume/Cap: 1.11 0.82 0.00 0.00 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.86 1.11 0.58
Delay/Veh: 118.3 34.6 0.0 0.0 107 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 88.4 21.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 118.3 34.6 0.0 0.0 107 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 88.4 21.2
LOS by Move: F C-A A F A A A A C F C+
HCM2kAvgQ: 21 20 0 0 21 0 0 0 0 30 58 15
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:02:00 2014 Page 85-16
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM Mitigation
Intersection #6:De Anza Blvd and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2245***0
Lanes:1 0 5 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):124
1 727
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.166 1!7***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):123.9 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):75.2 1 1350
LOS:E-
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:781***1991 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 418 1446 0 0 1575 538 0 0 0 850 7 582
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 418 1446 0 0 1575 538 0 0 0 850 7 582
Added Vol: 351 461 0 0 502 416 0 0 0 483 0 68
App+Div: 12 84 0 0 168 11 0 0 0 17 0 77
Initial Fut: 781 1991 0 0 2245 965 0 0 0 1350 7 727
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 781 1991 0 0 2245 0 0 0 0 1350 7 727
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 781 1991 0 0 2245 0 0 0 0 1350 7 727
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 781 1991 0 0 2245 0 0 0 0 1350 7 727
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.64 0.01 1.35
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 9500 1750 0 0 0 2880 12 2359
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.25 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.60 0.31
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 26.4 51.5 0.0 0.0 25.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.5 63.5 63.5
Volume/Cap: 1.17 0.84 0.00 0.00 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 1.17 0.60
Delay/Veh: 139.1 35.5 0.0 0.0 130 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.1 111 21.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 139.1 35.5 0.0 0.0 130 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.1 111 21.6
LOS by Move: F D+ A A F A A A A C-F C+
HCM2kAvgQ: 25 21 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 35 65 16
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:02:00 2014 Page 85-19
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM Mitigation
Intersection #7: De Anza Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 2701***720
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
865 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
17*** 1! Critical V/C:1.218 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):136.3 0
1398 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):92.3 0 0
LOS:F
Lanes:0 0 5 0 1
Final Vol:0***1794 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1248 396 642 1783 0 616 17 634 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1248 396 642 1783 0 616 17 634 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 482 213 67 744 0 219 0 739 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 64 13 11 174 0 30 0 25 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1794 622 720 2701 0 865 17 1398 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1794 0 720 2701 0 865 17 1398 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1794 0 720 2701 0 865 17 1398 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1794 0 720 2701 0 865 17 1398 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.38 0.01 1.61 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2410 26 2816 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.23 0.47 0.00 0.36 0.66 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 21.8 0.0 26.4 48.3 0.0 66.7 66.7 66.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.07 0.00 1.07 1.22 0.00 0.67 1.22 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 95.5 0.0 104.7 140 0.0 21.1 132 32.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 95.5 0.0 104.7 140 0.0 21.1 132 32.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A F A F F A C+ F C-A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 21 0 19 51 0 19 76 37 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:02:00 2014 Page 85-20
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM Mitigation
Intersection #7: De Anza Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 2853***742
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
900 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
17*** 1! Critical V/C:1.320 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):181.3 0
1603 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):120.5 0 0
LOS:F
Lanes:0 0 5 0 1
Final Vol:0***1870 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1248 396 642 1783 0 616 17 634 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1248 396 642 1783 0 616 17 634 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 558 234 89 896 0 254 0 944 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 64 13 11 174 0 30 0 25 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1870 643 742 2853 0 900 17 1603 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1870 0 742 2853 0 900 17 1603 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1870 0 742 2853 0 900 17 1603 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1870 0 742 2853 0 900 17 1603 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.36 0.01 1.63 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2371 23 2857 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.24 0.50 0.00 0.38 0.72 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 21.4 0.0 25.6 47.0 0.0 68.0 68.0 68.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.14 0.00 1.14 1.32 0.00 0.69 1.32 1.02 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 123 0.0 130.1 186 0.0 21.0 176 52.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 123 0.0 130.1 186 0.0 21.0 176 52.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A F A F F A C+ F D-A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 23 0 23 62 0 20 93 50 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:02:00 2014 Page 85-33
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project AM Mitigation
Intersection #21: Wolfe Road and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1266 0
Lanes:1 0 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):55
2 1150***
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.967 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):28.5 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):23.6 2 483
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0 2527***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
Added Vol: 0 973 145 0 164 155 0 0 0 68 0 467
App+Div: 0 53 91 0 86 17 0 0 0 44 0 19
Initial Fut: 0 2527 509 0 1266 637 0 0 0 483 0 1150
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2527 0 0 1266 0 0 0 0 483 0 1150
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2527 0 0 1266 0 0 0 0 483 0 1150
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2527 0 0 1266 0 0 0 0 483 0 1150
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 0 3800 1750 0 0 0 3150 0 3150
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.37
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 25.2 0.0 0.0 25.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.8 0.0 20.8
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.97 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.97
Delay/Veh: 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 13.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.8 0.0 35.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 25.4 0.0 0.0 13.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.8 0.0 35.3
LOS by Move: A C A A B A A A A B A D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 15 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 4 0 18
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:02:00 2014 Page 85-34
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A AM Mitigation
Intersection #21: Wolfe Road and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1258 0
Lanes:1 0 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):55
2 1165***
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.983 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):31.7 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):25.8 2 506
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0 2577***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
Added Vol: 0 1023 141 0 156 151 0 0 0 91 0 482
App+Div: 0 53 91 0 86 17 0 0 0 44 0 19
Initial Fut: 0 2577 505 0 1258 633 0 0 0 506 0 1165
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2577 0 0 1258 0 0 0 0 506 0 1165
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2577 0 0 1258 0 0 0 0 506 0 1165
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2577 0 0 1258 0 0 0 0 506 0 1165
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 0 3800 1750 0 0 0 3150 0 3150
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.37
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.0 25.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.7 0.0 20.7
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.98 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.98
Delay/Veh: 0.0 28.4 0.0 0.0 13.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 38.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 28.4 0.0 0.0 13.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 38.9
LOS by Move: A C A A B A A A A B A D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 16 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 4 0 19
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:02:00 2014 Page 85-35
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM Mitigation
Intersection #21: Wolfe Road and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1398 0
Lanes:1 0 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):55
2 1222***
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.020 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):41.2 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):32.1 2 692
LOS:C-
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0 2653***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
Added Vol: 0 1099 170 0 296 206 0 0 0 277 0 539
App+Div: 0 53 91 0 86 17 0 0 0 44 0 19
Initial Fut: 0 2653 534 0 1398 688 0 0 0 692 0 1222
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2653 0 0 1398 0 0 0 0 692 0 1222
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2653 0 0 1398 0 0 0 0 692 0 1222
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2653 0 0 1398 0 0 0 0 692 0 1222
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 0 3800 1750 0 0 0 3150 0 3150
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.39
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 25.1 0.0 0.0 25.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.9 0.0 20.9
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.02 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.00 1.02
Delay/Veh: 0.0 37.9 0.0 0.0 15.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.2 0.0 48.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 37.9 0.0 0.0 15.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.2 0.0 48.3
LOS by Move: A D+ A A B A A A A B A D
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 18 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 6 0 22
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:02:00 2014 Page 85-36
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM Mitigation
Intersection #21: Wolfe Road and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1602 0
Lanes:1 0 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):55
2 1251***
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.046 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):49.3 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):38.4 2 942
LOS:D+
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0 2725***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1501 273 0 1016 465 0 0 0 371 0 664
Added Vol: 0 1171 248 0 500 292 0 0 0 527 0 568
App+Div: 0 53 91 0 86 17 0 0 0 44 0 19
Initial Fut: 0 2725 612 0 1602 774 0 0 0 942 0 1251
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2725 0 0 1602 0 0 0 0 942 0 1251
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2725 0 0 1602 0 0 0 0 942 0 1251
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2725 0 0 1602 0 0 0 0 942 0 1251
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 0 3800 1750 0 0 0 3150 0 3150
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.40
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 25.1 0.0 0.0 25.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.9 0.0 20.9
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.00 1.05
Delay/Veh: 0.0 46.2 0.0 0.0 22.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.7 0.0 56.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 46.2 0.0 0.0 22.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.7 0.0 56.1
LOS by Move: A D A A C+ A A A A B-A E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 20 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 11 0 24
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:02:00 2014 Page 85-40
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM Mitigation
Intersection #22: Wolfe Road and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1837***0
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
1609 2
Cycle Time (sec):55
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.064 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):57.2 0
1788*** 2 Avg Delay (sec/veh):46.8 0 0
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0 1754 0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1055 433 0 913 474 719 0 322 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1055 433 0 913 474 719 0 322 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 537 186 0 801 225 883 0 1311 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 162 34 0 123 11 7 0 155 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 1754 653 0 1837 710 1609 0 1788 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1754 0 0 1837 0 1609 0 1788 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1754 0 0 1837 0 1609 0 1788 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1754 0 0 1837 0 1609 0 1788 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 0 5700 1750 3150 0 3150 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 29.3 0.0 29.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.02 0.00 0.00 1.06 0.00 0.96 0.00 1.06 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 44.9 0.0 0.0 60.2 0.0 25.5 0.0 54.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 44.9 0.0 0.0 60.2 0.0 25.5 0.0 54.1 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A D A A E A C A D-A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 18 0 0 15 0 23 0 33 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 13:39:17 2014 Page 30-12
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM Mitigation
Intersection #24: Stevens Creek Blvd and Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 573 198***
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
967*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 202
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
906 3 Critical V/C:0.940 3 1133***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):59.9 0
85 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):51.1 2 98
LOS:D-
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:175 1118***161
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 160 875 101 184 270 468 418 515 74 44 778 99
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 160 875 101 184 270 468 418 515 74 44 778 99
Added Vol: 2 219 25 -8 294 131 516 258 3 26 226 47
App+Div: 13 24 35 22 9 44 33 133 8 28 129 56
Initial Fut: 175 1118 161 198 573 643 967 906 85 98 1133 202
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 175 1118 161 198 573 0 967 906 85 98 1133 202
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 175 1118 161 198 573 0 967 906 85 98 1133 202
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 175 1118 161 198 573 0 967 906 85 98 1133 202
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.59 0.41 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 4929 710 1750 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.23 0.23 0.11 0.15 0.00 0.31 0.16 0.05 0.03 0.20 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 17.3 29.0 29.0 14.4 26.1 0.0 39.2 47.2 47.2 17.3 25.4 39.8
Volume/Cap: 0.69 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.69 0.00 0.94 0.40 0.12 0.22 0.94 0.35
Delay/Veh: 56.9 57.3 57.3 97.5 45.8 0.0 54.9 26.3 23.3 45.6 60.5 30.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 56.9 57.3 57.3 97.5 45.8 0.0 54.9 26.3 23.3 45.6 60.5 30.6
LOS by Move: E+ E+ E+ F D A D-C C D E C
HCM2kAvgQ: 8 20 20 11 11 0 23 8 2 2 15 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Wed Jun 04 09:37:25 2014 Page 10-3
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM Mitigation
Intersection #27: Homestead Road and Tantau Avenue/Quail Av ((CUP/SUN)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:104 202***102
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
52 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 57
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
880*** 2 Critical V/C:0.832 1 985
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):54.7 0
431 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):43.6 1 264***
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:355***88 10
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue/Quail Ave Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 41 68 64 96 95 92 49 549 194 178 782 51
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 41 68 64 96 95 92 49 549 194 178 782 51
Added Vol: 133 11 12 2 80 10 2 83 145 79 124 0
App+Div: 181 9 -66 4 27 2 1 248 92 7 79 6
Initial Fut: 355 88 10 102 202 104 52 880 431 264 985 57
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 355 88 10 102 202 104 52 880 431 264 985 57
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 355 88 10 102 202 104 52 880 431 264 985 57
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 355 88 10 102 202 104 52 880 431 264 985 57
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.89 0.11 1.00 0.64 0.36 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.88 0.12
Final Sat.: 1750 1691 192 1750 1219 627 1750 3800 1750 1750 3575 207
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.20 0.05 0.05 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.03 0.23 0.25 0.15 0.28 0.28
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 30.3 27.5 27.5 27.5 24.7 24.7 9.7 34.5 64.8 22.5 47.3 47.3
Volume/Cap: 0.83 0.23 0.23 0.26 0.83 0.83 0.38 0.83 0.47 0.83 0.72 0.72
Delay/Veh: 57.4 39.9 39.9 40.3 62.4 62.4 56.1 47.7 19.1 65.7 34.5 34.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 57.4 39.9 39.9 40.3 62.4 62.4 56.1 47.7 19.1 65.7 34.5 34.5
LOS by Move: E+ D D D E E E+ D B-E C-C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 15 3 3 4 14 14 2 18 11 13 18 18
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Wed Jun 04 09:37:25 2014 Page 10-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM Mitigation
Intersection #27: Homestead Road and Tantau Avenue/Quail Av ((CUP/SUN)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:104 258***103
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
53 1
Cycle Time (sec):124
0 57
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
905*** 2 Critical V/C:0.892 1 1000
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):62.1 0
433 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):48.2 1 292***
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:359***97 14
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue/Quail Ave Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 41 68 64 96 95 92 49 549 194 178 782 51
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 41 68 64 96 95 92 49 549 194 178 782 51
Added Vol: 137 20 16 3 136 10 3 108 147 107 139 0
App+Div: 181 9 -66 4 27 2 1 248 92 7 79 6
Initial Fut: 359 97 14 103 258 104 53 905 433 292 1000 57
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 359 97 14 103 258 104 53 905 433 292 1000 57
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 359 97 14 103 258 104 53 905 433 292 1000 57
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 359 97 14 103 258 104 53 905 433 292 1000 57
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.86 0.14 1.00 0.70 0.30 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.88 0.12
Final Sat.: 1750 1643 237 1750 1322 533 1750 3800 1750 1750 3579 204
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.21 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.24 0.25 0.17 0.28 0.28
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 28.5 27.8 27.8 27.8 27.1 27.1 9.5 33.1 61.6 23.2 46.9 46.9
Volume/Cap: 0.89 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.89 0.89 0.40 0.89 0.50 0.89 0.74 0.74
Delay/Veh: 67.4 40.0 40.0 40.0 68.1 68.1 56.5 53.7 21.3 74.0 35.4 35.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 67.4 40.0 40.0 40.0 68.1 68.1 56.5 53.7 21.3 74.0 35.4 35.4
LOS by Move: E D D D E E E+ D-C+ E D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 16 3 3 4 17 17 3 20 12 15 18 18
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 13:39:17 2014 Page 30-16
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM Mitigation
Intersection #32: Stevens Creek Blvd and Tantau Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:231 0 267***
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
349*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
912 2 Critical V/C:0.927 3 1820***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):57.0 0
51 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):49.0 1 170
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Final Vol:111 204***105
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 75 169 68 79 0 176 184 543 31 125 740 315
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 75 169 68 79 0 176 184 543 31 125 740 315
Added Vol: 19 32 36 75 0 21 94 248 6 43 863 634
App+Div: 17 3 1 113 0 34 71 121 14 2 217 31
Initial Fut: 111 204 105 267 0 231 349 912 51 170 1820 980
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 111 204 105 267 0 231 349 912 51 170 1820 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 111 204 105 267 0 231 349 912 51 170 1820 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 111 204 105 267 0 231 349 912 51 170 1820 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.27 0.47 0.26 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.83 0.17 1.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 481 884 455 3150 0 1750 1750 5374 301 1750 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.08 0.00 0.13 0.20 0.17 0.17 0.10 0.32 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 29.9 29.9 29.9 11.0 0.0 36.8 25.8 42.7 42.7 24.4 41.3 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.00 0.43 0.93 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.93 0.00
Delay/Veh: 69.2 69.2 69.2 88.4 0.0 33.8 74.8 30.2 30.2 43.1 46.1 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 69.2 69.2 69.2 88.4 0.0 33.8 74.8 30.2 30.2 43.1 46.1 0.0
LOS by Move: E E E F A C-E C C D D A
HCM2kAvgQ: 20 20 20 7 0 7 15 9 9 6 26 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 16 12:07:49 2014 Page 8-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM Mitigation
Intersection #38: Stevens Creek Blvd/Agilent Drwy (SJ)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Final Vol:138 1***16
Lanes:1 0 1!0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
576*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):160
1 791
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1596 2 Critical V/C:0.946 4 3945***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):48.6 0
18 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):37.7 1 27
LOS:D+
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:1 0 0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Agilent Drwy Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 1 0 0 2 1 4 245 1394 18 27 2252 402
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 1 0 0 2 1 4 245 1394 18 27 2252 402
Added Vol: 0 0 0 14 0 134 323 133 0 0 1191 389
App+Div: 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 69 0 0 502 0
Initial Fut: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1596 18 27 3945 791
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1596 18 27 3945 791
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1596 18 27 3945 791
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1596 18 27 3945 791
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.10 0.01 1.89 1.00 2.96 0.04 1.00 4.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 1900 0 1930 22 3300 1750 5631 64 1750 7600 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.33 0.28 0.28 0.02 0.52 0.45
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 54.7 122 122.1 18.9 86.3 86.3
Volume/Cap: 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.71 0.67 0.96 0.37 0.37 0.13 0.96 0.84
Delay/Veh: 70.4 0.0 0.0 71.0 84.2 80.7 79.2 6.3 6.3 63.5 42.7 37.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 70.4 0.0 0.0 71.0 84.2 80.7 79.2 6.3 6.3 63.5 42.7 37.7
LOS by Move: E A A E F F E-A A E D D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 1 5 5 33 8 8 1 44 33
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 16 12:07:49 2014 Page 8-2
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM Mitigation
Intersection #38: Stevens Creek Blvd/Agilent Drwy (SJ)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Final Vol:138 1***16
Lanes:1 0 1!0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
576*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):160
1 791
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1632 2 Critical V/C:0.997 4 4311***
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):59.5 0
18 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):45.0 1 27
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:1 0 0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Include
Street Name: Agilent Drwy Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 1 0 0 2 1 4 245 1394 18 27 2252 402
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 1 0 0 2 1 4 245 1394 18 27 2252 402
Added Vol: 0 0 0 14 0 134 323 169 0 0 1557 389
App+Div: 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 69 0 0 502 0
Initial Fut: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1632 18 27 4311 791
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1632 18 27 4311 791
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1632 18 27 4311 791
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 1 0 0 16 1 138 576 1632 18 27 4311 791
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.10 0.01 1.89 1.00 2.96 0.04 1.00 4.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 1900 0 1930 22 3300 1750 5633 62 1750 7600 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.04 0.04 0.33 0.29 0.29 0.02 0.57 0.45
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 51.8 123 122.5 18.5 89.2 89.2
Volume/Cap: 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.71 0.67 1.02 0.38 0.38 0.13 1.02 0.81
Delay/Veh: 70.4 0.0 0.0 71.0 84.2 80.7 96.3 6.2 6.2 63.9 53.7 33.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 70.4 0.0 0.0 71.0 84.2 80.7 96.3 6.2 6.2 63.9 53.7 33.7
LOS by Move: E A A E F F F A A E D-C-
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 1 5 5 35 9 9 1 53 31
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:02:00 2014 Page 85-59
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B AM Mitigation
Intersection #39: Stevens Creek Blvd and Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:749***0 103
Lanes:2 0 0 0 1
Signal=Permit Signal=Permit
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):6
0
1680 5 Critical V/C:0.995 3 4033***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):37.5 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):29.4 0 0
LOS:C
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 88 0 568 0 1396 0 0 2113 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 88 0 568 0 1396 0 0 2113 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 147 0 0 1544 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 15 0 144 0 137 0 0 376 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 103 0 749 0 1680 0 0 4033 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 103 0 749 0 1680 0 0 4033 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 103 0 749 0 1680 0 0 4033 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 103 0 749 0 1680 0 0 4033 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1750 0 3150 0 9500 0 0 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.7 0.0 28.7 0.0 85.3 0.0 0.0 85.3 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.2 0.0 77.1 0.0 6.1 0.0 0.0 30.1 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.2 0.0 77.1 0.0 6.1 0.0 0.0 30.1 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A D+ A E-A A A A C A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 22 0 4 0 0 48 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:02:00 2014 Page 85-60
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM Mitigation
Intersection #39: Stevens Creek Blvd and Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:749***0 103
Lanes:2 0 0 0 1
Signal=Permit Signal=Permit
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):6
0
1716 5 Critical V/C:1.062 3 4398***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):57.6 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):44.5 0 0
LOS:D
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Final Vol:0 0 0
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Lawrence Exwy SB Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 0 0 0 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 0 88 0 568 0 1396 0 0 2113 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0 88 0 568 0 1396 0 0 2113 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 183 0 0 1909 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 15 0 144 0 137 0 0 376 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 0 103 0 749 0 1716 0 0 4398 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 103 0 749 0 1716 0 0 4398 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 103 0 749 0 1716 0 0 4398 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0 103 0 749 0 1716 0 0 4398 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 1750 0 3150 0 9500 0 0 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.9 0.0 26.9 0.0 87.1 0.0 0.0 87.1 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 1.06 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 1.06 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.8 0.0 98.3 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 50.6 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.8 0.0 98.3 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 50.6 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A D+ A F A A A A D A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 24 0 4 0 0 61 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Wed Jun 04 14:30:48 2014 Page 7-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project AM Mitigation
Intersection #40: Stevens Creek Blvd and NB Lawrence Ramps (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:0 0 0
Lanes:0 0 0 0 0
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
617*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 294
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
1202 3 Critical V/C:1.156 3 1705***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):113.7 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):86.4 0 0
LOS:F
Lanes:2 1 1 0 1
Final Vol:2714***782 165
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: NB Lawrence Ramps Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10 0 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 891 574 165 0 0 0 509 975 0 0 1222 236
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 891 574 165 0 0 0 509 975 0 0 1222 236
Added Vol: 1518 92 0 0 0 0 7 176 0 0 391 1
App+Div: 305 116 0 0 0 0 101 51 0 0 92 57
Initial Fut: 2714 782 165 0 0 0 617 1202 0 0 1705 294
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 2714 782 165 0 0 0 617 1202 0 0 1705 294
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 2714 782 165 0 0 0 617 1202 0 0 1705 294
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 2714 782 165 0 0 0 617 1202 0 0 1705 294
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 3.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 4725 1900 1750 0 0 0 3150 5700 0 0 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.57 0.41 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.17
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 59.6 59.6 59.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.3 51.4 0.0 0.0 31.0 31.0
Volume/Cap: 1.16 0.83 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.16 0.49 0.00 0.00 1.16 0.65
Delay/Veh: 104.6 27.3 16.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 139.6 25.0 0.0 0.0 123 42.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 104.6 27.3 16.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 139.6 25.0 0.0 0.0 123 42.9
LOS by Move: F C B A A A F C A A F D
HCM2kAvgQ: 60 26 4 0 0 0 21 10 0 0 33 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 13:51:35 2014 Page 9-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM Mitigation
Intersection #3: Stevens Creek Blvd and Stelling Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:176 508 613***
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
372*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 530
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1354 3 Critical V/C:1.005 2 1511***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):67.6 0
463 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):53.4 2 449
LOS:D-
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:214 320***232
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Stelling Road Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 146 270 146 251 425 129 249 870 334 292 807 157
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 146 270 146 251 425 129 249 870 334 292 807 157
Added Vol: 9 14 0 341 22 34 108 415 16 8 640 352
App+Div: 59 36 86 21 61 13 15 69 113 149 64 21
Initial Fut: 214 320 232 613 508 176 372 1354 463 449 1511 530
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 214 320 232 613 508 176 372 1354 463 449 1511 530
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 214 320 232 613 508 176 372 1354 463 449 1511 530
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 214 320 232 613 508 176 372 1354 463 449 1511 530
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.45 0.55 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.17 0.83
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 1750 2761 957 3150 5700 1750 3150 4128 1448
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.08 0.13 0.35 0.18 0.18 0.12 0.24 0.26 0.14 0.37 0.37
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 24.2 11.7 37.0 48.8 36.4 36.4 16.5 42.2 66.3 25.3 51.0 51.0
Volume/Cap: 0.71 1.00 0.50 1.00 0.71 0.71 1.00 0.79 0.56 0.79 1.00 1.00
Delay/Veh: 62.1 116 44.5 83.2 49.5 49.5 104.3 34.5 11.4 54.0 48.6 48.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 62.1 116 44.5 83.2 49.5 49.5 104.3 34.5 11.4 54.0 48.6 48.6
LOS by Move: E F D F D D F C-B+ D-D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 11 9 35 14 14 12 16 8 11 34 34
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 13:35:20 2014 Page 30-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #3: Stevens Creek Blvd and Stelling Road (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:177 508 617***
Lanes:0 1 1 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
373*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 543***
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1394 3 Critical V/C:0.947 3 1583
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):72.8 0
466 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):48.2 2 455
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:216 321***234
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Stelling Road Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 146 270 146 251 425 129 249 870 334 292 807 157
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 146 270 146 251 425 129 249 870 334 292 807 157
Added Vol: 11 15 2 345 22 35 109 455 19 14 712 365
App+Div: 59 36 86 21 61 13 15 69 113 149 64 21
Initial Fut: 216 321 234 617 508 177 373 1394 466 455 1583 543
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 216 321 234 617 508 177 373 1394 466 455 1583 543
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 216 321 234 617 508 177 373 1394 466 455 1583 543
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 216 321 234 617 508 177 373 1394 466 455 1583 543
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.45 0.55 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 3800 1750 1750 2757 961 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.08 0.13 0.35 0.18 0.18 0.12 0.24 0.27 0.14 0.28 0.31
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 25.9 12.5 36.0 52.1 38.7 38.7 17.5 39.8 65.8 23.5 45.9 45.9
Volume/Cap: 0.67 0.95 0.52 0.95 0.67 0.67 0.95 0.86 0.57 0.86 0.85 0.95
Delay/Veh: 58.2 98.5 45.7 65.6 46.6 46.6 86.9 39.7 11.9 62.3 33.4 56.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 58.2 98.5 45.7 65.6 46.6 46.6 86.9 39.7 11.9 62.3 33.4 56.0
LOS by Move: E+ F D E D D F D B+ E C-E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 10 10 10 32 14 14 11 18 9 11 19 25
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-9
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #5: Homestead Road and De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:254 2020***553
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
202 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 286
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
735*** 2 Critical V/C:0.987 1 565
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):64.7 0
444 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):49.8 2 511***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:607***1499 636
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
Added Vol: 64 191 28 62 142 22 12 27 64 185 67 100
App+Div: 82 77 30 10 169 52 45 43 63 24 45 5
Initial Fut: 607 1499 636 553 2020 254 202 735 444 511 565 286
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 607 1499 636 553 2020 254 202 735 444 511 565 286
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 607 1499 636 553 2020 254 202 735 444 511 565 286
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 607 1499 636 553 2020 254 202 735 444 511 565 286
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.29 0.71
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2452 1241
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.26 0.36 0.18 0.35 0.15 0.06 0.19 0.25 0.16 0.23 0.23
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 27.3 46.5 69.5 31.1 50.2 50.2 11.0 27.4 54.7 23.0 39.4 39.4
Volume/Cap: 0.99 0.79 0.73 0.79 0.99 0.40 0.82 0.99 0.65 0.99 0.82 0.82
Delay/Veh: 80.1 30.6 12.8 47.8 44.9 21.5 82.4 85.8 37.0 94.5 52.1 52.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 80.1 30.6 12.8 47.8 44.9 21.5 82.4 85.8 37.0 94.5 52.1 52.1
LOS by Move: F C B D D C+ F F D+ F D-D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 18 17 13 15 34 6 7 21 13 18 18 18
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-10
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM Mitigation
Intersection #5: Homestead Road and De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:277 2061***534
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
227 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 272
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
740*** 2 Critical V/C:1.016 1 573
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):71.7 0
559 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):53.6 2 462***
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:711***1561 639
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
Added Vol: 168 253 31 43 183 45 37 32 179 136 75 86
App+Div: 82 77 30 10 169 52 45 43 63 24 45 5
Initial Fut: 711 1561 639 534 2061 277 227 740 559 462 573 272
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 711 1561 639 534 2061 277 227 740 559 462 573 272
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 711 1561 639 534 2061 277 227 740 559 462 573 272
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 711 1561 639 534 2061 277 227 740 559 462 573 272
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.34 0.66
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2508 1191
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.27 0.37 0.17 0.36 0.16 0.07 0.19 0.32 0.15 0.23 0.23
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 31.1 50.0 70.2 30.9 49.8 49.8 11.3 26.8 57.9 20.2 35.8 35.8
Volume/Cap: 1.02 0.77 0.73 0.77 1.02 0.44 0.89 1.02 0.77 1.02 0.89 0.89
Delay/Veh: 82.1 26.9 12.1 46.6 52.5 22.3 94.1 93.9 40.5 106.1 61.2 61.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 82.1 26.9 12.1 46.6 52.5 22.3 94.1 93.9 40.5 106.1 61.2 61.2
LOS by Move: F C B D D-C+ F F D F E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 21 17 13 14 37 7 8 22 19 17 20 20
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-11
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM Mitigation
Intersection #5: Homestead Road and De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:296 2205***587
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
244 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 317
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
817*** 2 Critical V/C:1.246 1 666
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):163.7 0
644 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):103.3 2 905***
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:789***1777 895
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
Added Vol: 246 469 287 96 327 64 54 109 264 579 168 131
App+Div: 82 77 30 10 169 52 45 43 63 24 45 5
Initial Fut: 789 1777 895 587 2205 296 244 817 644 905 666 317
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 789 1777 895 587 2205 296 244 817 644 905 666 317
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 789 1777 895 587 2205 296 244 817 644 905 666 317
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 789 1777 895 587 2205 296 244 817 644 905 666 317
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.32 0.68
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2505 1192
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.25 0.31 0.51 0.19 0.39 0.17 0.08 0.22 0.37 0.29 0.27 0.27
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 28.1 44.8 77.1 26.8 43.4 43.4 12.7 24.1 52.3 32.3 43.7 43.7
Volume/Cap: 1.25 0.97 0.93 0.97 1.25 0.55 0.85 1.25 0.99 1.25 0.85 0.85
Delay/Veh: 170.3 47.6 20.1 77.5 150 29.2 83.7 181 74.9 176.1 51.4 51.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 170.3 47.6 20.1 77.5 150 29.2 83.7 181 74.9 176.1 51.4 51.4
LOS by Move: F D C+ E-F C F F E F D-D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 31 26 25 20 51 10 9 30 35 39 21 21
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-12
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #5: Homestead Road and De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:312 2233***611
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
256 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 338
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
826*** 2 Critical V/C:1.294 1 687
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):184.5 0
693 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):116.4 2 951***
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:857***1840 901
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: De Anza Bl/Saratoga-Sunnyvale Rd Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 461 1231 578 481 1709 180 145 665 317 302 453 181
Added Vol: 314 532 293 120 355 80 66 118 313 625 189 152
App+Div: 82 77 30 10 169 52 45 43 63 24 45 5
Initial Fut: 857 1840 901 611 2233 312 256 826 693 951 687 338
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 857 1840 901 611 2233 312 256 826 693 951 687 338
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 857 1840 901 611 2233 312 256 826 693 951 687 338
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 857 1840 901 611 2233 312 256 826 693 951 687 338
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.30 0.70
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2477 1219
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.27 0.32 0.51 0.19 0.39 0.18 0.08 0.22 0.40 0.30 0.28 0.28
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 29.4 44.9 77.5 27.0 42.4 42.4 12.7 23.5 53.0 32.7 43.4 43.4
Volume/Cap: 1.29 1.01 0.93 1.01 1.29 0.59 0.89 1.29 1.05 1.29 0.89 0.89
Delay/Veh: 188.8 55.5 19.8 85.9 171 31.2 90.7 202 91.4 196.0 55.3 55.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 188.8 55.5 19.8 85.9 171 31.2 90.7 202 91.4 196.0 55.3 55.3
LOS by Move: F E+ B-F F C F F F F E+ E+
HCM2kAvgQ: 36 28 24 21 54 11 9 31 41 42 23 23
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-13
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #6: De Anza Blvd and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2258***0
Lanes:1 0 5 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 749
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.139 1!1***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):112.6 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):64.9 1 830
LOS:E
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:1186***2014 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Added Vol: 397 240 0 0 164 226 0 0 0 147 0 43
App+Div: 20 166 0 0 182 9 0 0 0 24 0 42
Initial Fut: 1186 2014 0 0 2258 592 0 0 0 830 1 749
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1186 2014 0 0 2258 0 0 0 0 830 1 749
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1186 2014 0 0 2258 0 0 0 0 830 1 749
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 1186 2014 0 0 2258 0 0 0 0 830 1 749
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.52 0.01 1.47
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 9500 1750 0 0 0 2669 2 2579
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.38 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.45 0.29
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 46.3 75.5 0.0 0.0 29.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.5 55.5 55.5
Volume/Cap: 1.14 0.66 0.00 0.00 1.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.78 1.14 0.73
Delay/Veh: 105.9 5.6 0.0 0.0 115 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.1 114 37.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 105.9 5.6 0.0 0.0 115 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.1 114 37.2
LOS by Move: F A A A F A A A A D F D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 40 7 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 23 52 21
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-14
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM Mitigation
Intersection #6: De Anza Blvd and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2355***0
Lanes:1 0 5 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 789
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.213 1!1***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):143.4 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):80.4 1 877
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:1292***2144 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Added Vol: 503 370 0 0 261 237 0 0 0 194 0 83
App+Div: 20 166 0 0 182 9 0 0 0 24 0 42
Initial Fut: 1292 2144 0 0 2355 603 0 0 0 877 1 789
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1292 2144 0 0 2355 0 0 0 0 877 1 789
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1292 2144 0 0 2355 0 0 0 0 877 1 789
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 1292 2144 0 0 2355 0 0 0 0 877 1 789
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.52 0.01 1.47
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 9500 1750 0 0 0 2670 2 2578
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.41 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.48 0.31
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 47.4 76.0 0.0 0.0 28.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.0 55.0 55.0
Volume/Cap: 1.21 0.69 0.00 0.00 1.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.84 1.21 0.78
Delay/Veh: 135.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 147 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.6 145 39.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 135.0 5.6 0.0 0.0 147 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.6 145 39.1
LOS by Move: F A A A F A A A A D F D
HCM2kAvgQ: 48 7 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 26 60 23
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-15
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM Mitigation
Intersection #6: De Anza Blvd and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2550***0
Lanes:1 0 5 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 835
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.380 1!1***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):216.7 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):116.0 1 1056
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:1519***2647 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Added Vol: 730 873 0 0 456 714 0 0 0 373 0 129
App+Div: 20 166 0 0 182 9 0 0 0 24 0 42
Initial Fut: 1519 2647 0 0 2550 1080 0 0 0 1056 1 835
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1519 2647 0 0 2550 0 0 0 0 1056 1 835
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1519 2647 0 0 2550 0 0 0 0 1056 1 835
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 1519 2647 0 0 2550 0 0 0 0 1056 1 835
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.55 0.01 1.44
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 9500 1750 0 0 0 2726 2 2522
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.48 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.54 0.33
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 48.9 76.1 0.0 0.0 27.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.9 54.9 54.9
Volume/Cap: 1.38 0.85 0.00 0.00 1.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 1.38 0.84
Delay/Veh: 206.1 8.1 0.0 0.0 222 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.1 218 41.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 206.1 8.1 0.0 0.0 222 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.1 218 41.9
LOS by Move: F A A A F A A A A E F D
HCM2kAvgQ: 67 15 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 37 79 26
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-16
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #6:De Anza Blvd and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2602***0
Lanes:1 0 5 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 861
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.460 1!1***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):251.9 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):135.6 1 1081
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 3 0 0
Final Vol:1691***2758 0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 769 1608 0 0 1912 357 0 0 0 659 1 664
Added Vol: 902 984 0 0 508 784 0 0 0 398 0 155
App+Div: 20 166 0 0 182 9 0 0 0 24 0 42
Initial Fut: 1691 2758 0 0 2602 1150 0 0 0 1081 1 861
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1691 2758 0 0 2602 0 0 0 0 1081 1 861
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1691 2758 0 0 2602 0 0 0 0 1081 1 861
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 1691 2758 0 0 2602 0 0 0 0 1081 1 861
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.55 0.01 1.44
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 9500 1750 0 0 0 2723 2 2525
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.54 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.56 0.34
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 51.5 77.7 0.0 0.0 26.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 53.3 53.3 53.3
Volume/Cap: 1.46 0.87 0.00 0.00 1.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.04 1.46 0.90
Delay/Veh: 238.9 7.4 0.0 0.0 258 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.6 255 46.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 238.9 7.4 0.0 0.0 258 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.6 255 46.1
LOS by Move: F A A A F A A A A E-F D
HCM2kAvgQ: 80 14 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 41 86 29
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-19
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM Mitigation
Intersection #7: De Anza Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 2922 657***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
850 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
3*** 1! Critical V/C:1.245 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):153.6 0
1258 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):104.4 0 0
LOS:F
Lanes:0 0 5 0 1
Final Vol:0 3349***0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1956 591 555 1989 0 453 3 435 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1956 591 555 1989 0 453 3 435 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 1231 571 93 736 0 372 0 786 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 162 24 9 197 0 25 0 37 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 3349 1186 657 2922 0 850 3 1258 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 3349 0 657 2922 0 850 3 1258 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 3349 0 657 2922 0 850 3 1258 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 3349 0 657 2922 0 850 3 1258 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.40 0.01 1.59 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2454 5 2792 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.21 0.51 0.00 0.35 0.60 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 39.6 0.0 23.5 63.1 0.0 67.9 67.9 67.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.24 0.00 1.24 1.14 0.00 0.71 1.24 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 151 0.0 175.9 84.6 0.0 29.2 151 41.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 151 0.0 175.9 84.6 0.0 29.2 151 41.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A F A F F A C F D A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 47 0 25 53 0 19 77 37 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-20
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #7: De Anza Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:0 2981 676***
Lanes:0 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
890 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
3*** 1! Critical V/C:1.326 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):189.0 0
1374 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):127.1 0 0
LOS:F
Lanes:0 0 5 0 1
Final Vol:0 3592***0
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: De Anza Blvd I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1956 591 555 1989 0 453 3 435 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1956 591 555 1989 0 453 3 435 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 1474 643 112 795 0 412 0 902 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 162 24 9 197 0 25 0 37 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 3592 1258 676 2981 0 890 3 1374 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 3592 0 676 2981 0 890 3 1374 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 3592 0 676 2981 0 890 3 1374 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 3592 0 676 2981 0 890 3 1374 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.39 0.01 1.60 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2436 5 2809 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.21 0.52 0.00 0.37 0.65 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 39.9 0.0 22.7 62.6 0.0 68.4 68.4 68.4 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.33 0.00 1.33 1.17 0.00 0.75 1.33 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 186 0.0 211.2 99.1 0.0 29.9 187 54.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 186 0.0 211.2 99.1 0.0 29.9 187 54.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A F A F F A C F D-A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 54 0 29 57 0 21 90 47 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-21
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #8: Stevens Creek Blvd and De Anza Blvd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:667 1984 813***
Lanes:1 0 4 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
550*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 385
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
905 3 Critical V/C:0.919 2 832***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):59.9 0
519 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):50.1 2 572
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:597 1073***485
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Added Vol: 28 104 51 272 141 254 233 115 40 107 139 115
App+Div: 61 31 134 54 31 154 114 93 62 113 127 28
Initial Fut: 597 1073 485 813 1984 667 550 905 519 572 832 385
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 597 1073 485 813 1984 667 550 905 519 572 832 385
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 597 1073 485 813 1984 667 550 905 519 572 832 385
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 597 1073 485 813 1984 667 550 905 519 572 832 385
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 7600 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.19 0.28 0.26 0.26 0.38 0.17 0.16 0.30 0.18 0.22 0.22
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 28.6 28.7 60.7 39.3 39.4 66.0 26.6 28.0 56.6 32.0 33.4 33.4
Volume/Cap: 0.93 0.92 0.64 0.92 0.93 0.81 0.92 0.79 0.73 0.79 0.92 0.92
Delay/Veh: 65.0 56.7 17.1 50.4 43.8 18.8 75.0 57.2 39.3 57.0 62.4 63.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 65.0 56.7 17.1 50.4 43.8 18.8 75.0 57.2 39.3 57.0 62.4 63.0
LOS by Move: E E+ B D D B-E E+ D E+ E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 19 18 12 23 24 20 15 12 18 15 21 21
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-22
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM Mitigation
Intersection #8: Stevens Creek Blvd and De Anza Blvd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:641 2028***773
Lanes:1 0 4 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
533*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 397
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
914 3 Critical V/C:0.953 2 834***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):60.1 0
538 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):51.6 2 574
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:678***1150 500
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Added Vol: 109 181 66 232 185 228 216 124 59 109 141 127
App+Div: 61 31 134 54 31 154 114 93 62 113 127 28
Initial Fut: 678 1150 500 773 2028 641 533 914 538 574 834 397
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 678 1150 500 773 2028 641 533 914 538 574 834 397
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 678 1150 500 773 2028 641 533 914 538 574 834 397
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 678 1150 500 773 2028 641 533 914 538 574 834 397
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 7600 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3797 1800
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.20 0.29 0.25 0.27 0.37 0.17 0.16 0.31 0.18 0.22 0.22
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 31.6 32.0 62.4 38.9 39.2 64.1 24.9 26.8 58.4 30.4 32.3 32.3
Volume/Cap: 0.95 0.88 0.64 0.88 0.95 0.80 0.95 0.84 0.74 0.84 0.95 0.96
Delay/Veh: 65.8 49.4 15.8 46.6 47.2 20.0 83.6 60.5 38.3 61.5 68.2 69.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 65.8 49.4 15.8 46.6 47.2 20.0 83.6 60.5 38.3 61.5 68.2 69.0
LOS by Move: E D B D D B-F E D+ E E E
HCM2kAvgQ: 21 18 12 21 25 20 15 13 19 16 22 22
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:22:21 2014 Page 25-6
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM Mitigation
Intersection #8: Stevens Creek Blvd and De Anza Blvd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:812 2306***839
Lanes:1 0 4 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
712*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 315
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
943 3 Critical V/C:1.097 3 896***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):101.1 0
732 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):79.2 2 685
LOS:E-
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:996***1481 569
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Added Vol: 427 512 135 298 463 399 395 153 253 220 203 45
App+Div: 61 31 134 54 31 154 114 93 62 113 127 28
Initial Fut: 996 1481 569 839 2306 812 712 943 732 685 896 315
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 996 1481 569 839 2306 812 712 943 732 685 896 315
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 996 1481 569 839 2306 812 712 943 732 685 896 315
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 996 1481 569 839 2306 812 712 943 732 685 896 315
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 7600 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.32 0.26 0.33 0.27 0.30 0.46 0.23 0.17 0.42 0.22 0.16 0.18
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 40.4 39.1 66.8 40.0 38.7 67.6 28.9 21.1 61.5 27.8 20.1 60.1
Volume/Cap: 1.10 0.93 0.68 0.93 1.10 0.96 1.10 1.10 0.95 1.10 1.10 0.42
Delay/Veh: 96.3 46.8 13.4 51.6 89.5 35.2 120.3 120 59.4 121.1 121 28.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 96.3 46.8 13.4 51.6 89.5 35.2 120.3 120 59.4 121.1 121 28.2
LOS by Move: F D B D-F D+ F F E+ F F C
HCM2kAvgQ: 36 24 13 24 35 38 22 16 30 26 20 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:22:21 2014 Page 25-8
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #8: Stevens Creek Blvd and De Anza Blvd (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:824 2342***917
Lanes:1 0 4 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
714 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 324
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
983*** 3 Critical V/C:1.143 3 967
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):120.0 0
736 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):92.1 2 773***
LOS:F
Lanes:2 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:1005***1551 595
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: De Anza Blvd Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 508 938 300 487 1812 259 203 697 417 352 566 242
Added Vol: 436 582 161 376 499 411 397 193 257 308 274 54
App+Div: 61 31 134 54 31 154 114 93 62 113 127 28
Initial Fut: 1005 1551 595 917 2342 824 714 983 736 773 967 324
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1005 1551 595 917 2342 824 714 983 736 773 967 324
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1005 1551 595 917 2342 824 714 983 736 773 967 324
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 1005 1551 595 917 2342 824 714 983 736 773 967 324
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 7600 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.32 0.27 0.34 0.29 0.31 0.47 0.23 0.17 0.42 0.25 0.17 0.19
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 39.1 37.1 67.2 39.7 37.7 67.0 29.3 21.1 60.2 30.1 21.9 61.6
Volume/Cap: 1.14 1.03 0.71 1.03 1.14 0.98 1.08 1.14 0.98 1.14 1.08 0.42
Delay/Veh: 115.3 69.2 13.9 73.9 109 40.9 115.4 138 66.6 136.2 115 27.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 115.3 69.2 13.9 73.9 109 40.9 115.4 138 66.6 136.2 115 27.3
LOS by Move: F E B E F D F F E F F C
HCM2kAvgQ: 38 29 14 31 37 42 21 18 32 30 21 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-25
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #9: De Anza Blvd and McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:137 2337***254
Lanes:0 1 3 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
212 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 118***
1
Loss Time (sec):9
1
120 0 Critical V/C:0.908 0 188
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):57.4 0
363*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):53.4 2 235
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:469***1296 138
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Added Vol: 8 103 63 86 189 11 6 9 6 63 13 74
App+Div: 51 154 2 28 147 21 23 0 27 0 0 23
Initial Fut: 469 1296 138 254 2337 137 212 120 363 235 188 118
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 469 1296 138 254 2337 137 212 120 363 235 188 118
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 469 1296 138 254 2337 137 212 120 363 235 188 118
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 469 1296 138 254 2337 137 212 120 363 235 188 118
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.69 0.31 1.00 3.76 0.24 1.31 0.69 1.00 2.00 0.59 0.41
Final Sat.: 3150 5109 544 1750 7145 419 2301 1302 1750 3150 1130 709
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.07 0.17 0.17
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.0 46.7 46.7 26.7 50.4 50.4 32.0 32.0 32.0 25.6 25.6 25.6
Volume/Cap: 0.91 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.91 0.91 0.40 0.40 0.91 0.41 0.91 0.91
Delay/Veh: 77.3 43.6 43.6 63.5 47.6 47.6 46.2 46.2 76.6 50.9 83.2 83.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 77.3 43.6 43.6 63.5 47.6 47.6 46.2 46.2 76.6 50.9 83.2 83.2
LOS by Move: E-D D E D D D D E-D F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 15 20 20 13 29 29 6 6 20 6 17 17
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-26
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM Mitigation
Intersection #9: De Anza Blvd and McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:135 2375***237
Lanes:0 1 3 0 1
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
210 1
Cycle Time (sec):140
0 101
1
Loss Time (sec):9
1
118 0 Critical V/C:0.909 0 187***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):57.0 0
363*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):52.6 2 233
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:469***1338 126
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Added Vol: 8 145 51 69 227 9 4 7 6 61 12 57
App+Div: 51 154 2 28 147 21 23 0 27 0 0 23
Initial Fut: 469 1338 126 237 2375 135 210 118 363 233 187 101
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 469 1338 126 237 2375 135 210 118 363 233 187 101
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 469 1338 126 237 2375 135 210 118 363 233 187 101
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 469 1338 126 237 2375 135 210 118 363 233 187 101
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.93 0.95 0.92 0.83 0.95 0.95
Lanes: 2.00 2.73 0.27 1.00 3.78 0.22 1.29 0.71 1.00 2.00 0.65 0.35
Final Sat.: 3150 5117 482 1750 7096 403 2273 1277 1750 3150 1169 631
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.26 0.26 0.14 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.09 0.21 0.07 0.16 0.16
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 22.9 49.0 49.0 25.4 51.5 51.5 31.9 31.9 31.9 24.6 24.6 24.6
Volume/Cap: 0.91 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.91 0.91 0.41 0.41 0.91 0.42 0.91 0.91
Delay/Veh: 77.6 41.6 41.6 63.6 47.0 47.0 46.3 46.3 76.9 51.9 85.3 85.3
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 77.6 41.6 41.6 63.6 47.0 47.0 46.3 46.3 76.9 51.9 85.3 85.3
LOS by Move: E-D D E D D D D E-D-F F
HCM2kAvgQ: 15 20 20 12 29 29 6 6 20 6 16 16
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:22:21 2014 Page 25-10
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM Mitigation
Intersection #9: De Anza Blvd and McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:134 2730***319
Lanes:0 1 3 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
209 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 178
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
118 1 Critical V/C:0.885 1 192
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):50.1 0
370*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):49.1 2 275***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:475***1635 166
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Added Vol: 14 442 91 151 582 8 3 7 13 103 17 134
App+Div: 51 154 2 28 147 21 23 0 27 0 0 23
Initial Fut: 475 1635 166 319 2730 134 209 118 370 275 192 178
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 475 1635 166 319 2730 134 209 118 370 275 192 178
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 475 1635 166 319 2730 134 209 118 370 275 192 178
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 475 1635 166 319 2730 134 209 118 370 275 192 178
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.70 0.30 1.00 3.80 0.20 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5134 521 1750 7215 354 3150 1900 1750 3150 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.32 0.32 0.18 0.38 0.38 0.07 0.06 0.21 0.09 0.10 0.10
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.9 53.3 53.3 30.5 59.9 59.9 19.5 33.5 33.5 13.8 27.8 27.8
Volume/Cap: 0.88 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.88 0.88 0.48 0.26 0.88 0.88 0.51 0.51
Delay/Veh: 72.8 42.5 42.5 67.3 40.2 40.2 56.4 43.5 71.0 86.9 51.2 51.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 72.8 42.5 42.5 67.3 40.2 40.2 56.4 43.5 71.0 86.9 51.2 51.4
LOS by Move: E D D E D D E+ D E F D-D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 15 25 25 16 31 31 5 4 20 10 8 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 19:22:21 2014 Page 25-12
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #9: De Anza Blvd and McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:135 2845***329
Lanes:0 1 3 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
209 2
Cycle Time (sec):140
1 224
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
121 1 Critical V/C:0.911 1 203
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):52.4 0
370*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):51.0 2 303***
LOS:D
Lanes:2 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:476***1677 172
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: De Anza Blvd McClellan Rd/Pacifica Dr
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 410 1039 73 140 2001 105 183 111 330 172 175 21
Added Vol: 15 484 97 161 697 9 3 10 13 131 28 180
App+Div: 51 154 2 28 147 21 23 0 27 0 0 23
Initial Fut: 476 1677 172 329 2845 135 209 121 370 303 203 224
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 476 1677 172 329 2845 135 209 121 370 303 203 224
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 476 1677 172 329 2845 135 209 121 370 303 203 224
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 476 1677 172 329 2845 135 209 121 370 303 203 224
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.70 0.30 1.00 3.80 0.20 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 5129 526 1750 7228 343 3150 1900 1750 3150 1900 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.33 0.33 0.19 0.39 0.39 0.07 0.06 0.21 0.10 0.11 0.13
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 23.2 53.2 53.2 30.6 60.5 60.5 16.9 32.5 32.5 14.8 30.3 30.3
Volume/Cap: 0.91 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.91 0.91 0.55 0.27 0.91 0.91 0.49 0.59
Delay/Veh: 77.5 43.8 43.8 70.4 41.6 41.6 59.6 44.4 76.6 89.9 49.0 51.7
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 77.5 43.8 43.8 70.4 41.6 41.6 59.6 44.4 76.6 89.9 49.0 51.7
LOS by Move: E-D D E D D E+ D E-F D D-
HCM2kAvgQ: 15 27 27 17 33 33 6 4 20 11 8 10
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 13:51:35 2014 Page 9-2
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM Mitigation
Intersection #18: Wolfe Road and Homestead Road (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:267 1226***220
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
373 2
Cycle Time (sec):110
1 211
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
910*** 3 Critical V/C:0.981 2 989
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):67.2 0
526 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):51.5 2 811***
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:763***925 424
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 322 758 189 159 1113 121 201 713 251 444 773 108
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 322 758 189 159 1113 121 201 713 251 444 773 108
Added Vol: 421 142 131 14 51 141 153 126 273 180 174 47
App+Div: 20 25 104 47 62 5 19 71 2 187 42 56
Initial Fut: 763 925 424 220 1226 267 373 910 526 811 989 211
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 763 925 424 220 1226 267 373 910 526 811 989 211
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 763 925 424 220 1226 267 373 910 526 811 989 211
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 763 925 424 220 1226 267 373 910 526 811 989 211
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.22 0.15 0.12 0.16 0.30 0.26 0.26 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 27.1 39.8 68.7 11.4 24.1 38.7 14.6 17.9 45.0 28.9 32.1 43.6
Volume/Cap: 0.98 0.67 0.39 0.67 0.98 0.43 0.89 0.98 0.73 0.98 0.89 0.30
Delay/Veh: 68.8 30.9 10.5 52.9 63.8 27.7 67.4 70.9 31.4 67.0 46.5 23.1
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 68.8 30.9 10.5 52.9 63.8 27.7 67.4 70.9 31.4 67.0 46.5 23.1
LOS by Move: E C B+ D-E C E E C E D C
HCM2kAvgQ: 21 14 8 4 15 7 11 15 17 22 19 5
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 13:35:20 2014 Page 30-8
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #18: Wolfe Road and Homestead Road (CUP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:268 1262***220
Lanes:1 0 3 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
378 2
Cycle Time (sec):110
1 212
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
919*** 3 Critical V/C:1.014 3 999
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):75.5 0
550 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):53.8 2 843***
LOS:D-
Lanes:2 0 2 0 1
Final Vol:797***1006 434
Signal=Protect/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: Wolfe Road Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 322 758 189 159 1113 121 201 713 251 444 773 108
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 322 758 189 159 1113 121 201 713 251 444 773 108
Added Vol: 455 223 141 14 87 142 158 135 297 212 184 48
App+Div: 20 25 104 47 62 5 19 71 2 187 42 56
Initial Fut: 797 1006 434 220 1262 268 378 919 550 843 999 212
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 797 1006 434 220 1262 268 378 919 550 843 999 212
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 797 1006 434 220 1262 268 378 919 550 843 999 212
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 797 1006 434 220 1262 268 378 919 550 843 999 212
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3150 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.25 0.26 0.25 0.07 0.22 0.15 0.12 0.16 0.31 0.27 0.18 0.12
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 27.5 40.7 69.8 10.7 24.0 42.9 18.9 17.5 44.9 29.0 27.6 38.4
Volume/Cap: 1.01 0.72 0.39 0.72 1.01 0.39 0.70 1.01 0.77 1.01 0.70 0.35
Delay/Veh: 76.9 31.4 10.0 55.9 72.0 24.5 46.9 79.6 33.1 75.2 38.9 26.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 76.9 31.4 10.0 55.9 72.0 24.5 46.9 79.6 33.1 75.2 38.9 26.9
LOS by Move: E-C B+ E+ E C D E-C-E-D+ C
HCM2kAvgQ: 23 15 8 4 16 7 9 16 19 24 11 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Wed Jun 04 11:43:54 2014 Page 11-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM Mitigation
Intersection #21: Wolfe Road and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2529***0
Lanes:1 0 2 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):55
2 893***
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:1.135 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):83.0 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):54.7 2 721
LOS:D-
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0 1728 0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1003 440 0 1533 702 0 0 0 566 0 545
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1003 440 0 1533 702 0 0 0 566 0 545
Added Vol: 0 585 625 0 844 844 0 0 0 135 0 332
App+Div: 0 140 239 0 152 10 0 0 0 20 0 16
Initial Fut: 0 1728 1304 0 2529 1556 0 0 0 721 0 893
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1728 0 0 2529 0 0 0 0 721 0 893
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1728 0 0 2529 0 0 0 0 721 0 893
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1728 0 0 2529 0 0 0 0 721 0 893
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 0 3800 1750 0 0 0 3150 0 3150
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.28
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 32.3 0.0 0.0 32.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.7 0.0 13.7
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.00 1.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.92 0.00 1.13
Delay/Veh: 0.0 6.9 0.0 0.0 78.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.4 0.0 96.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 6.9 0.0 0.0 78.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 35.4 0.0 96.6
LOS by Move: A A A A E-A A A A D+ A F
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 6 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 12 0 21
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Wed Jun 04 11:45:46 2014 Page 7-1
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #21: Wolfe Road and I-280 NB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2614***0
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):55
2 961***
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.913 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):20.8 0
0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):17.6 2 803
LOS:B
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0 1933 0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 NB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1003 440 0 1533 702 0 0 0 566 0 545
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1003 440 0 1533 702 0 0 0 566 0 545
Added Vol: 0 790 1101 0 929 909 0 0 0 217 0 400
App+Div: 0 140 239 0 152 10 0 0 0 20 0 16
Initial Fut: 0 1933 1780 0 2614 1621 0 0 0 803 0 961
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1933 0 0 2614 0 0 0 0 803 0 961
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1933 0 0 2614 0 0 0 0 803 0 961
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1933 0 0 2614 0 0 0 0 803 0 961
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 0 5700 1750 0 0 0 3150 0 3150
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.31
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 27.6 0.0 0.0 27.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.4 0.0 18.4
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.91
Delay/Veh: 0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.7 0.0 29.4
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.7 0.0 29.4
LOS by Move: A B+ A A B A A A A B-A C
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 8 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 9 0 14
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-40
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #22: Wolfe Road and I-280 SB Ramps (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 2176 0
Lanes:1 0 3 0 0
Signal=Split Signal=Split
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
895*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):55
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):9
0
0 0 Critical V/C:0.931 0 0
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):21.8 0
882 2 Avg Delay (sec/veh):19.5 0 0
LOS:B-
Lanes:0 0 3 0 1
Final Vol:0 2821***0
Signal=Permit/Rights=Ignore
Street Name: Wolfe Road I-280 SB Ramps
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1041 560 0 1524 703 330 0 292 0 0 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1041 560 0 1524 703 330 0 292 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 1333 417 0 410 736 558 0 284 0 0 0
App+Div: 0 447 96 0 242 18 7 0 306 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 2821 1073 0 2176 1457 895 0 882 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2821 0 0 2176 0 895 0 882 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2821 0 0 2176 0 895 0 882 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2821 0 0 2176 0 895 0 882 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.83 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 5700 1750 0 5700 1750 3150 0 3150 0 0 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: **** ****
Green Time: 0.0 29.2 0.0 0.0 29.2 0.0 16.8 0.0 16.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.93 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.93 0.00 0.92 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay/Veh: 0.0 18.0 0.0 0.0 10.6 0.0 33.7 0.0 31.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 18.0 0.0 0.0 10.6 0.0 33.7 0.0 31.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A B A A B+ A C-A C A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 21 0 0 9 0 14 0 14 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 13:35:20 2014 Page 30-9
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #24: Stevens Creek Blvd and Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1022 511***
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
788*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 491
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1478 3 Critical V/C:0.954 3 1145***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):67.0 0
250 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):52.8 2 283
LOS:D-
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:194 500***145
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 178 314 93 280 809 549 558 1071 237 195 685 158
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 178 314 93 280 809 549 558 1071 237 195 685 158
Added Vol: 1 147 6 204 181 206 139 186 1 29 215 189
App+Div: 15 39 46 27 32 88 91 221 12 59 245 144
Initial Fut: 194 500 145 511 1022 843 788 1478 250 283 1145 491
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 194 500 145 511 1022 0 788 1478 250 283 1145 491
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 194 500 145 511 1022 0 788 1478 250 283 1145 491
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 194 500 145 511 1022 0 788 1478 250 283 1145 491
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.28 0.72 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 4335 1257 1750 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.29 0.27 0.00 0.25 0.26 0.14 0.09 0.20 0.28
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 15.0 14.5 14.5 36.7 36.3 0.0 31.5 42.1 42.1 14.6 25.3 62.0
Volume/Cap: 0.89 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.89 0.00 0.95 0.74 0.41 0.74 0.95 0.54
Delay/Veh: 84.6 76.2 76.2 68.4 48.7 0.0 64.4 35.6 29.9 58.3 62.9 20.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 84.6 76.2 76.2 68.4 48.7 0.0 64.4 35.6 29.9 58.3 62.9 20.2
LOS by Move: F E-E-E D A E D+ C E+ E C+
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 12 12 25 21 0 19 15 7 6 15 12
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 13:35:20 2014 Page 30-10
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM Mitigation
Intersection #24: Stevens Creek Blvd and Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave (CUP/CMP)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Ignore
Final Vol:0 1010 466***
Lanes:1 0 2 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Overlap Lanes:Final Vol:
769*** 2
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 442
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1489 3 Critical V/C:0.928 3 1131***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):62.1 0
250 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):50.8 2 285
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 2 1 0
Final Vol:195 548***157
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Wolfe Rd/Miller Ave Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 178 314 93 280 809 549 558 1071 237 195 685 158
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 178 314 93 280 809 549 558 1071 237 195 685 158
Added Vol: 2 195 18 159 169 187 120 197 1 31 201 140
App+Div: 15 39 46 27 32 88 91 221 12 59 245 144
Initial Fut: 195 548 157 466 1010 824 769 1489 250 285 1131 442
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 195 548 157 466 1010 0 769 1489 250 285 1131 442
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 195 548 157 466 1010 0 769 1489 250 285 1131 442
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 195 548 157 466 1010 0 769 1489 250 285 1131 442
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.31 0.69 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1750 4351 1247 1750 3800 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.24 0.26 0.14 0.09 0.20 0.25
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 15.0 16.3 16.3 34.5 35.8 0.0 31.6 42.5 42.5 14.7 25.7 60.1
Volume/Cap: 0.89 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.89 0.00 0.93 0.74 0.40 0.74 0.93 0.50
Delay/Veh: 85.1 68.7 68.7 65.1 49.4 0.0 59.5 35.3 29.6 58.0 58.4 20.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 85.1 68.7 68.7 65.1 49.4 0.0 59.5 35.3 29.6 58.0 58.4 20.5
LOS by Move: F E E E D A E+ D+ C E+ E+ C+
HCM2kAvgQ: 11 12 12 22 21 0 18 16 7 6 14 11
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Wed Jun 04 11:43:54 2014 Page 11-4
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #27: Homestead Road and Tantau Avenue/Quail Av ((CUP/SUN)
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Final Vol:82 146***46
Lanes:0 1 0 0 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Overlap Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
62*** 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
0 24
0
Loss Time (sec):12
1
1167 2 Critical V/C:0.805 1 1224***
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):43.2 0
234 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):39.1 1 69
LOS:D
Lanes:1 0 0 1 0
Final Vol:414***211 262
Signal=Protect/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue/Quail Ave Homestead Road
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 98 80 173 41 107 75 50 805 118 133 904 18
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 98 80 173 41 107 75 50 805 118 133 904 18
Added Vol: 176 111 91 0 17 3 8 207 85 26 163 2
App+Div: 140 20 -2 5 22 4 4 155 31 -90 157 4
Initial Fut: 414 211 262 46 146 82 62 1167 234 69 1224 24
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 414 211 262 46 146 82 62 1167 234 69 1224 24
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 414 211 262 46 146 82 62 1167 234 69 1224 24
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 414 211 262 46 146 82 62 1167 234 69 1224 24
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.43 0.57 1.00 0.62 0.38 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.96 0.04
Final Sat.: 1750 809 1005 1750 1180 663 1750 3800 1750 1750 3721 73
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.03 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.31 0.13 0.04 0.33 0.33
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 34.7 40.0 40.0 12.8 18.1 18.1 7.0 46.4 81.1 8.8 48.2 48.2
Volume/Cap: 0.82 0.78 0.78 0.25 0.82 0.82 0.61 0.79 0.20 0.54 0.82 0.82
Delay/Veh: 49.9 42.6 42.6 49.9 66.5 66.5 65.3 35.7 7.4 58.1 35.6 35.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 49.9 42.6 42.6 49.9 66.5 66.5 65.3 35.7 7.4 58.1 35.6 35.6
LOS by Move: D D D D E E E D+ A E+ D+ D+
HCM2kAvgQ: 16 17 17 2 11 11 3 21 3 3 22 22
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 13:35:20 2014 Page 30-13
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #32: Stevens Creek Blvd and Tantau Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:332 0 851***
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
211 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1817*** 2 Critical V/C:0.977 3 1363
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):64.8 0
96 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):55.6 1 201***
LOS:E+
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Final Vol:102 81***99
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 69
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 69
Added Vol: 2 8 32 290 0 69 43 270 2 43 278 177
App+Div: 17 6 1 144 0 35 73 256 35 0 336 36
Initial Fut: 102 81 99 851 0 332 211 1817 96 201 1363 282
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 102 81 99 851 0 332 211 1817 96 201 1363 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 102 81 99 851 0 332 211 1817 96 201 1363 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 102 81 99 851 0 332 211 1817 96 201 1363 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.37 0.27 0.36 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.84 0.16 1.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 648 514 629 3150 0 1750 1750 5391 285 1750 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.27 0.00 0.19 0.12 0.34 0.34 0.11 0.24 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.3 19.3 19.3 33.2 0.0 51.8 18.6 41.4 41.4 14.1 36.9 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.00 0.44 0.78 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.78 0.00
Delay/Veh: 96.7 96.7 96.7 68.0 0.0 24.3 62.0 54.1 54.1 108.8 40.1 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 96.7 96.7 96.7 68.0 0.0 24.3 62.0 54.1 54.1 108.8 40.1 0.0
LOS by Move: F F F E A C E D-D-F D A
HCM2kAvgQ: 16 16 16 21 0 9 8 25 25 12 17 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 13:35:20 2014 Page 30-15
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM Mitigation
Intersection #32: Stevens Creek Blvd and Tantau Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:311 0 863***
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
192 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1898*** 2 Critical V/C:1.019 3 1171
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):75.8 0
86 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):62.8 1 227***
LOS:E
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Final Vol:86***81 126
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 69
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 69
Added Vol: -14 8 59 302 0 48 24 351 -8 69 86 182
App+Div: 17 6 1 144 0 35 73 256 35 0 336 36
Initial Fut: 86 81 126 863 0 311 192 1898 86 227 1171 287
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 86 81 126 863 0 311 192 1898 86 227 1171 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 86 81 126 863 0 311 192 1898 86 227 1171 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 86 81 126 863 0 311 192 1898 86 227 1171 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.30 0.26 0.44 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.86 0.14 1.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 525 495 769 3150 0 1750 1750 5433 246 1750 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.27 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.35 0.35 0.13 0.21 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.3 19.3 19.3 32.3 0.0 51.9 19.6 41.2 41.2 15.3 36.8 0.0
Volume/Cap: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 0.00 0.41 0.67 1.02 1.02 1.02 0.67 0.00
Delay/Veh: 108.3 108 108.3 79.6 0.0 23.9 53.2 64.6 64.6 117.6 37.3 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 108.3 108 108.3 79.6 0.0 23.9 53.2 64.6 64.6 117.6 37.3 0.0
LOS by Move: F F F E-A C D-E E F D+ A
HCM2kAvgQ: 17 17 17 22 0 8 7 28 28 14 13 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Mon Jun 09 13:35:20 2014 Page 30-16
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #32: Stevens Creek Blvd and Tantau Avenue (CUP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Final Vol:312 0 881***
Lanes:1 0 0 0 2
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Ignore Lanes:Final Vol:
199 1
Cycle Time (sec):120
1 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
2236*** 2 Critical V/C:1.113 3 1254
1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):106.5 0
98 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh):84.1 1 231***
LOS:F
Lanes:0 0 1!0 0
Final Vol:93 81 145***
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Street Name: Tantau Avenue Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 69
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 83 67 66 417 0 228 95 1291 59 158 749 69
Added Vol: -7 8 78 320 0 49 31 689 4 73 169 191
App+Div: 17 6 1 144 0 35 73 256 35 0 336 36
Initial Fut: 93 81 145 881 0 312 199 2236 98 231 1254 296
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 93 81 145 881 0 312 199 2236 98 231 1254 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 93 81 145 881 0 312 199 2236 98 231 1254 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 93 81 145 881 0 312 199 2236 98 231 1254 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 0.30 0.24 0.46 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.86 0.14 1.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 521 453 812 3150 0 1750 1750 5441 238 1750 5700 1750
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.28 0.00 0.18 0.11 0.41 0.41 0.13 0.22 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 19.3 19.3 19.3 30.2 0.0 50.1 20.0 44.3 44.3 14.2 38.6 0.0
Volume/Cap: 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.11 0.00 0.43 0.68 1.11 1.11 1.11 0.68 0.00
Delay/Veh: 137.2 137 137.2 112.4 0.0 25.2 53.6 95.9 95.9 148.8 36.5 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 137.2 137 137.2 112.4 0.0 25.2 53.6 95.9 95.9 148.8 36.5 0.0
LOS by Move: F F F F A C D-F F F D+ A
HCM2kAvgQ: 20 20 20 26 0 8 7 38 38 16 14 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-53
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
2040 No Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #36: Stevens Creek Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:40 450 452***
Lanes:0 1 0 1 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Ignore Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1580*** 3 Critical V/C:0.798 3 1922
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):42.6 0
0 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):31.8 2 751***
LOS:C
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:24***0 33
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 39 23 0 0 224 367 287 498 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 183 209 0 390 0
Initial Fut: 24 0 33 452 450 40 0 1580 1236 751 1922 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 24 0 33 452 450 40 0 1580 0 751 1922 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 24 0 33 452 450 40 0 1580 0 751 1922 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 24 0 33 452 450 40 0 1580 0 751 1922 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.50 1.37 0.13 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 2618 2606 232 0 5700 1750 3150 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.24 0.34 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 37.0 19.6 19.6 19.6 0.0 31.4 0.0 27.0 58.4 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.00 0.05 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.88 0.58 0.00
Delay/Veh: 41.4 0.0 20.2 47.9 47.9 47.9 0.0 38.1 0.0 45.7 13.3 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.4 0.0 20.2 47.9 47.9 47.9 0.0 38.1 0.0 45.7 13.3 0.0
LOS by Move: D A C+ D D D A D+ A D B A
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 1 13 13 13 0 19 0 14 12 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-54
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan A PM Mitigation
Intersection #36: Stevens Creek Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:40 450***452
Lanes:0 1 0 1 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Ignore Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1592*** 3 Critical V/C:0.804 3 1892
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):43.3 0
0 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):32.3 2 751***
LOS:C-
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:24***0 33
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 39 23 0 0 236 359 287 468 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 183 209 0 390 0
Initial Fut: 24 0 33 452 450 40 0 1592 1228 751 1892 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 24 0 33 452 450 40 0 1592 0 751 1892 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 24 0 33 452 450 40 0 1592 0 751 1892 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 24 0 33 452 450 40 0 1592 0 751 1892 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.45 1.42 0.13 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 2567 2555 227 0 5700 1750 3150 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.24 0.33 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 36.8 19.8 19.8 19.8 0.0 31.4 0.0 26.8 58.2 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.00 0.05 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.00 0.89 0.00 0.89 0.57 0.00
Delay/Veh: 41.4 0.0 20.4 48.5 48.5 48.5 0.0 38.6 0.0 46.7 13.3 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.4 0.0 20.4 48.5 48.5 48.5 0.0 38.6 0.0 46.7 13.3 0.0
LOS by Move: D A C+ D D D A D+ A D B A
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 1 13 13 13 0 19 0 14 12 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-55
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
General Plan B PM Mitigation
Intersection #36: Stevens Creek Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:40***459 453
Lanes:0 1 0 1 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Ignore Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1741*** 3 Critical V/C:0.832 3 1760
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):46.1 0
0 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):34.6 2 751***
LOS:C-
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:24***0 33
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Growth Adj:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 40 32 0 0 385 328 287 336 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 183 209 0 390 0
Initial Fut: 24 0 33 453 459 40 0 1741 1197 751 1760 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 24 0 33 453 459 40 0 1741 0 751 1760 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 24 0 33 453 459 40 0 1741 0 751 1760 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 24 0 33 453 459 40 0 1741 0 751 1760 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.49 1.38 0.13 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 2597 2631 229 0 5700 1750 3150 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.24 0.31 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 35.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 0.0 33.2 0.0 25.9 59.1 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.00 0.05 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.92 0.00 0.92 0.52 0.00
Delay/Veh: 41.4 0.0 21.0 52.8 52.8 52.8 0.0 40.1 0.0 51.7 12.3 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.4 0.0 21.0 52.8 52.8 52.8 0.0 40.1 0.0 51.7 12.3 0.0
LOS by Move: D A C+ D-D-D-A D A D-B A
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 1 14 14 14 0 21 0 15 10 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
COMPARE Tue Jun 03 18:35:40 2014 Page 85-56
Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc.Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose
City of Cupertino
General Plan 2040
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative)
GP Project PM Mitigation
Intersection #36: Stevens Creek Blvd and I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive (SJ/CMP)
Signal=Split/Rights=Include
Final Vol:40 460***454
Lanes:0 1 0 1 1
Signal=Protect Signal=Protect
Final Vol:Lanes:Rights=Ignore Vol Cnt Date:n/a Rights=Include Lanes:Final Vol:
0 0
Cycle Time (sec):100
0 0
0
Loss Time (sec):12
0
1835*** 3 Critical V/C:0.851 3 1857
0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh):48.7 0
0 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh):36.2 2 751***
LOS:D+
Lanes:1 0 0 0 1
Final Vol:24***0 33
Signal=Split/Rights=Overlap
Street Name: I-280 SB Ramps/Calvert Drive Stevens Creek Blvd
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R L -T -R
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Min. Green: 10 0 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 7 10 10
Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 24 0 33 413 427 37 0 1173 660 464 1034 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 41 33 0 0 479 609 287 433 0
App+Div: 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 183 209 0 390 0
Initial Fut: 24 0 33 454 460 40 0 1835 1478 751 1857 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 24 0 33 454 460 40 0 1835 0 751 1857 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 24 0 33 454 460 40 0 1835 0 751 1857 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 24 0 33 454 460 40 0 1835 0 751 1857 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.48 1.39 0.13 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1750 0 1750 2597 2632 229 0 5700 1750 3150 5700 0
------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.24 0.33 0.00
Crit Moves: **** **** **** ****
Green Time: 10.0 0.0 35.3 18.5 18.5 18.5 0.0 34.2 0.0 25.3 59.5 0.0
Volume/Cap: 0.14 0.00 0.05 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.00 0.94 0.00 0.94 0.55 0.00
Delay/Veh: 41.4 0.0 21.4 56.5 56.5 56.5 0.0 41.9 0.0 55.9 12.4 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel/Veh: 41.4 0.0 21.4 56.5 56.5 56.5 0.0 41.9 0.0 55.9 12.4 0.0
LOS by Move: D A C+ E+ E+ E+ A D A E+ B A
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 1 14 14 14 0 23 0 15 11 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
........................................................................................................................
APPENDIX H:
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS DATA
........................................................................................................................
1
CCIITTYY OOFF CCUUPPEERRTTIINNOO,, CCAALLIIFFOORRNNIIAA
PPRROOPPOOSSEEDD GGEENNEERRAALL PPLLAANN AAMMEENNDDMMEENNTT
WWAATTEERR SSUUPPPPLLYY EEVVAALLUUAATTIIOONN
MAY 20, 2014
PPPRRREEEPPPAAARRREEEDDD BBBYYY:::
YYYAAARRRNNNEEE &&& AAASSSSSSOOOCCCIIIAAATTTEEESSS,,, IIINNNCCC...
SSSAAANNN MMMAAATTTEEEOOO,,, CCCAAA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ......................................................................................................................................2
Proposed GP Amendment Information ............................................................................................2
Proposed GP Amendment Development .........................................................................................3
WSE Methodology...........................................................................................................................5
California Water Service Company Water Supply Evaluation ................................................6
Overview ..................................................................................................................................6
LAS District Population……………………………………………………………………...8
LAS District Water Demand…………………………………………………………………9
LAS District Demand Management………………………………………………………...12
Proposed Cupertino GP Amendment LAS District Demand Projections…………………..15
Proposed Cupertino GP Amendment and LAS District Demand Analysis………………...18
LAS District Water Supply…………………………………………………………………18
SCVWD Purchased Water……………………………………………………………….19
LAS District Groundwater……………………………………………………………….21
Recycled Water…………………………………………………………………………..23
LAS District Supply Adequacy and Reliability Assessment……………………………….24
Climate Change……………………………………………………………………………..29
LAS District Summary and Conclusion……………………………………………………30
San Jose Water Company Water Supply Evaluation………………………………………..31
Service Area Population…………………………………………………………………… 31
SJWC Water Demand………………………………………………………………………31
SJWC Demand Management………………………………………………………............ 32
Proposed Cupertino GP Amendment SJWC Demand Projections…………………………33
SJWC Water Supply………………………………………………………………………..35
SJWC Supply Adequacy and Reliability Assessment……………………………………...40
SJWC Summary and Conclusion…………………………………………………………..43
2
Introduction
The City of Cupertino (Cupertino) is proposing to amend its General Plan (GP) and as part of
that process has prepared a water supply evaluation (WSE) that will be incorporated into the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) being
prepared for the plan amendment. The WSE uses land use information provided by the City for
the proposed GP Amendment, Housing Element Update, and associated Rezoning (“EIR
Project”). The WSE is based on potential future development associated with the proposed plan
amendment.
California Water Service Company (Cal Water) and San Jose Water Company (SJWC) are the
municipal water utilities that provide retail water service to Cupertino. Figure 1 shows the
service area boundaries of each water utility. SJWC also has a lease agreement to operate and
maintain the City of Cupertino’s water system, i.e., owned by the city. Information on water
supply and existing demand has been obtained from documents and data from each utility.
The WSE provides information similar to that provided in a “Water Supply Assessment”
required by Water Code section 10910 et seq. (commonly known as SB 610), even though an SB
610 does not apply to a comprehensive general plan amendment. SB 610 applies to “projects”
subsidiary to a general plan amendment - specific plans or development projects that exceed SB
610 criteria.
The purpose of the WSE is to demonstrate the sufficiency of Cal Water’s and SJWC’s water
supplies to meet the water demands of the proposed Cupertino GP amendment, while meeting
current and projected water demands of existing customers.
Proposed GP Amendment Information
Cupertino is a city of 10.9 square miles located on the southern portion of the San Francisco
peninsula, in Santa Clara County. As shown on EIR Figure 3-1, the cities of Los Altos and
Sunnyvale are adjacent to the northern city boundaries while the cities of Santa Clara and San
Jose lie to the east and Saratoga lies to the south of Cupertino. Unincorporated areas of Santa
Clara County form the western and portions of the southern boundary of the city.
The city is accessed by Interstate 280, which functions as a major east/west regional connector
and Highway 85, which functions as the main north/south regional connector. Cupertino is
served by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) bus system, and has 11 bus
routes operating throughout various locations in the City, including several stops along De Anza
Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard. The VTA bus system provides local and regional
transportation to the greater Silicon Valley, including San Jose and Sunnyvale. In addition, the
VTA is contemplating a Bus Rapid Transit line along Stevens Creek Boulevard which is a major
east/west connector located in the City.
The existing General Plan (GP) delineates two areas: the urban service area and the sphere of
influence (SOI) area, which differ from current city boundaries. These areas are shown on EIR
Figure 3-2.
3
The Cupertino SOI includes incorporated county lands and areas which may be considered for
future annexation by the City. The SOI defines the area in the next 20 – 30 years where the City
may expand its services.
In 2013, the population of Cupertino was approximately 59,620 people and 20,164 households
with an average household size of 2.94 people.
Proposed GP Amendment objectives include:
1) Replenish, re-allocate, and increase citywide office, commercial, hotel, and residential
development for anticipated future growth,
2) Consolidate development requests by several property owners for amendments to the General
Plan, and
3) Provide a full range of housing to meet the needs of all segments of the city’s population.
The City’s current 2005 General Plan controls the amount of commercial, office, hotel, and
residential built in the City through development allocations in terms of square feet (commercial
and office), rooms (hotel), and units (residential). Allocations are geographically assigned in
certain neighborhoods, commercial centers, and employment centers so that private development
meets City goals and priorities and minimizes adverse impacts to the environment. The City
allocates development for net new office and commercial square footage, hotel rooms, and/or
residential units on a project-by-project basis to applicants. The City anticipates using the same
system of development allocation with the General Plan amendment.
Proposed GP Amendment Development
This section provides a summary of proposed GP Amendment development for Alternatives A,
B and C – the alternative with the highest level of proposed development. EIR Figure 3-4 shows
the five major proposed development corridors.
The EIR figure titled Alternative C summarizes development allocations by major corridor and is
used in the WSE for assessing adequacy of water supply since it represents the greatest potential
increase in demand. Alternatives A and B are also evaluated although they represent lesser
degrees of development and therefore lesser water demand.
It is noted that the proposed development levels for Alternative C cover all proposed new
development projected to occur between 2015 and 2040 - the projected build-out date. The WSE
uses a 25-year period or 5 years beyond the 20 year period use by SB 610. The EIR notes that the
2040 horizon year is consistent with other planning documents, including Plan Bay Area, which
is a long-range integrated transportation and land-use/housing strategy for the San Francisco Bay
Area as required by SB375.
Table 1, prepared by the City of Cupertino, shows the proposed development for each alternative
by utility service area.
The City of Cupertino has a 25 year term lease agreement with SJWC for operations and
maintenance of its water system (designated Cupertino Water). Section 7, Operation of Water
4
System, of the lease states that SJWC shall “throughout the term of the lease undertake any
utility plant addition, betterment, replacement, repair and perform routine and emergency
maintenance of the Water System…” Section 10, Water Supply states that SJWC “will perform
and honor all supply contracts executed by the City…” It also states that “If assignment or
transfer of any water right or contract is deemed necessary by either SJWC or the City, City will
cooperate with SJWC in completing such assignment or transfer for the duration of the lease.”
The lease was signed on October 1, 1997 for a 25 year term so on October 1, 2014, 8 years
remain on the lease.
Representatives of the City and SJWC indicate that SJWC has been and is responsible for
maintaining an adequate water supply for the Cupertino water system and will continue to do so
under the terms of the lease. The City has two 500 gpm wells that are primarily kept on standby
so that under normal operations, all of the water for the City’s service area is purchased by
SJWC from Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD). Accordingly, proposed development
in both SJWC’s and the Cupertino water system are combined for the purposes of evaluating
supply for SJWC. This is shown in Table 2, proposed development for each alternative for Cal
Water and SJWC.
Table 1: Proposed GP Amendment Development by Utility Service Area
Cal
Water SJWC Cupertino
Water Total
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Residential
(DU)
1,273 219 403 1,895
Office (sq
ft)
945,000 20,000 75,231 1,040,231
Commercial
(sq ft)
630,000 59,000 12,413 701,413
Hotel
(rooms)
600 ‐ ‐ 600
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Residential
(DU)
2,479 276 561 3,316
Office (sq
ft)
2,355,000 45,000 140,231 2,540,231
Commercial
(sq ft) 972,734 330,000 40,945 1,343,679
Hotel
(rooms)
839 ‐ ‐ 839
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Residential
(DU)
3,484 350 587 4,421
Office (sq
ft)
3,785,000 80,000 175,231 4,040,231
5
Commercial
(sq ft)
972,734 330,000 40,945 1,343,679
Hotel
(rooms)
1,339 ‐ ‐ 1,339
Table 2: Proposed GP Amendment Development for Cal Water and SJWC
Cal
Water
SJWC +
Cupertino
Water
Total
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Residential
(DU)
1,273 622 1,895
Office (sq
ft)
945,000 95,231 1,040,231
Commercial
(sq ft)
630,000 71,413 701,413
Hotel
(rooms)
600 ‐ 600
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Residential
(DU)
2,479 837 3,316
Office (sq
ft)
2,355,000 185,231 2,540,231
Commercial
(sq ft) 972,734 370,945 1,343,679
Hotel
(rooms)
839 ‐ 839
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Residential
(DU)
3,484 937 4,421
Office (sq
ft)
3,785,000 255,231 4,040,231
Commercial
(sq ft)
972,734 370,945 1,343,679
Hotel
(rooms)
1,339 ‐ 1,339
WSE Methodology
Following is a summary of the method for estimating future water demand to 2040 for both
water utilities serving the city.
6
1. Estimate current total water demand in the combined SJWC and City service areas and
Cal Water’s service areas.
2. Using representative water use data for each user class (office, commercial, hotel and
residential), estimate the increase in water demand from 2015 to 2040 for the proposed
GP amendment plan in SJWC’s and Cal Water’s service areas.
3. Factor in each utility’s, projected water savings from implementation of their water
conservation programs.
4. Summarize existing water supplies for each utility and include any planned, programmed
or current projects that will increase water supply and when those increases are projected
to occur.
5. Estimate the supply available during normal, one dry year and multiple dry year periods
and compare to the projected demands.
6. Assess the adequacy of supply and indicate any actions or conditions that are necessary
for future projected demands to be met by SJWC and Cal Water.
The WSE is organized in three separate sections. Section 1 presents an analysis of the
proposed development that would occur in each of the utility’s service areas. Section 2
presents a water supply evaluation for Cal Water and Section 3 for SJWC. Combined the last
two sections provide a complete evaluation of the adequacy of future supplies of each utility
to meet the demands associated with the proposed GP amendment.
Note table and figure numbers are specific to each section.
California Water Service Company Water Supply Evaluation
Overview
The Los Altos Suburban (LAS) District of Cal Water currently provides water service to a
portion of the City of Cupertino. The LAS District is in Santa Clara County approximately 45
miles south of San Francisco and 11 miles north of San Jose. Figure 1 is a general location map
of the LAS District.
7
Figure 1: General Location of Los Altos Suburban District – Santa Clara County
The LAS district system serves all of the incorporated City of Los Altos and sections within the
cities of Cupertino, Los Altos Hills, Mountain View, Sunnyvale and adjacent unincorporated
areas of Santa Clara County. The LAS district service area boundary is shown in Figure 2.
The cities of Mountain View, Sunnyvale and Santa Clara own and operate water systems
northeast and southeast of the District. The balance of the City of Cupertino’s water system is
operated by San Jose Water Company. Purissima Hills Water District is north of the City of Los
Altos Hills.
Los Altos
8
Figure 2: LAS District General Service Area
LAS District Population
Based on information in Cal Water’s 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), the LAS
District has grown at the slow rate of 0.13% per year based on increases in total services from
2005 to 2010. LAS services growth rate averaged 0.15% (factor of 1.0015) per year for the ten
years from 2000 to 2009. Based on developable space and past experiences, Cal Water expected
a growth rate of 0.15% to continue in the foreseeable future.
Based on U.S. Census data, the LAS District population is estimated by Cal Water to be 65,550
in 2010, which is an increase by a factor of 1.188 over the estimated 2000 population of 55,177.
The average growth rate of population for the 10 year period is therefore an increase by a factor
of 1.0193 per year – significantly higher than the 2010 UWMP estimate. Assuming that the
future population growth rate will be an average of the two rates for the next 26 years, the
population growth rate would be 1.010 per year. Therefore, the projected 2040 population would
be 1.282 x 65,550 = 84,030. The 2010 UWMP projected a 2040 population of 62,650 or 21,380
less than what will be used in this WSE.
The population density of 2.60 persons per housing unit remained essentially unchanged over the
Service Area
Boundary
9
10 year period. If this value remains unchanged in 2040, then an additional 8,223 housing units
will have to be built in the next 26 years or an average 316 housing units per year.
Cal Water uses U.S. Census data in estimating population for its California districts. Estimating
population involves overlaying U.S. Census 2010 Block data onto Cal Water service area maps
(SAM). This method for estimating existing and future populations is accepted by the California
Public Utilities Commission (CPUC).
The WSE population estimate for the LAS District service area population in 5 year increments
is shown in Table 1.
Table 1: LAS District Population Estimates
Year 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
Service
Area
Population
65,550 68,630 71,710 74,790 77,870 80,950 84,030
LAS District Water Demand
Historically, Cal Water projected water demand by multiplying the projected number of services for
each user class by one of three (high, average and low) historic service rates for that class based on
customer water records. The sum of the projected demands for each user class equals the total
projected demand for the LAS District. After the passage of Senate Bill 7 (SBx7-7) this method, Cal
Water no longer used this method for projecting water demands.
The method used in Cal Water’s 2010 LAS UWMP to determine future water demands complies
with SBx7-7 requirements.
Cal Water’s target water demand projection includes conservations savings due to passive and
active demand management, which is described later in this section. The target demand is
calculated by multiplying SBx7-7 target gpcd values and projected population.
Cal Water is intensifying its water conservation programs for its 24 California service districts by
significantly increasing expenditures to reduce per capita urban water use. Senate Bill No. 7 (SBx7-
7) adopted in November 2009 mandates a statewide 20 percent reduction in per capita urban water
use by December 31, 2020. The CPUC directed Class A and B water utilities to adopt conservation
programs and rate structures designed to achieve reductions in per capita water use. In 2010, Cal
Water developed five-year conservation program plans for each of its districts. The complete Los
Altos Suburban District Conservation Master Plan is in Appendix G of the 2010 UWMP.
SBx7-7 requires progress toward the 2020 goal by reducing per capita water use by at least 10
percent on or before December 31, 2015. Each urban retail water supplier must develop 2015 and
2020 urban water use targets in accordance with specific requirements. SBx7-7 provides several
ways to calculate water use reduction targets. Retail water suppliers can also form regional alliances
within the same hydrologic region to achieve compliance.
Under the regional compliance approach, water suppliers within the same hydrologic region can
10
comply by either meeting their individual target or being part of a regional alliance that meets its
regional target. For all Cal Water districts within the same hydrologic region, Cal Water intends
to form regional alliances. The LAS District is part of the San Francisco Bay Area hydrologic
region, along with Bear Gulch, Livermore, Mid-Peninsula and South San Francisco districts.
Under SBx7-7, an urban retail water supplier may adopt one of four methods for determining its
2020 gpcd target. The method selected by Cal Water was to set the 2020 target to 80 percent of
average gpcd for the 10-year base period of 1999-2008. The 2015 target was set to 90 percent of
baseline water use. Baseline water use is the average water use for any continuous 10-year
period ending between 2004 and 2010.
Table 2 shows the average per capital use for the 10 year period from 2001 to 2010, which was
199 gpcd. (Note this table differs from the LAS 2010 UWMP which based its population
projections on 2000 US Bureau Census data and an earlier 10 year period where total water use
was higher.) Were Table 2 to be the basis for setting the 2020 target, it would be: 0.8 x 199 = 159
gpcd. The 2015 target would be: 0.9 x 199 = 179 gpcd.
Table 2 : LAS District Water Use for 10-Year Period Base
Base Period Year Distribution
System
Population
Daily System
Total Water
Use (mgd)
Annual Daily Per
Capita Water Use
(gpcd) Year Year
1 2001 56,214 13.57 241
2 2002 57,252 13.48 235
3 2003 58,289 13.16 226
4 2004 59,326 13.53 228
5 2005 60,364 13.17 218
6 2006 61,401 12.96 211
7 2007 62,438 13.79 221
8 2008 63,475 13.83 218
9 2009 64,513 12.57 195
10 2010 65,550 10.39 159
Base Daily Per Capita Water Use 199
In addition to metered water sales to LAS District customers, unaccounted for losses from the
distribution system are calculated to determine total system demand. Unaccounted for losses are
included in Table 2.
Table 3 presents actual and projected LAS District water demand through 2040 based on total
demand projections meeting revised SBx7-7 gpcd targets and distribution system losses.
Projected demand for 2015 is close 2008 demand and in 2020 is lower than 2015 due to
anticipated increased water conservation. For the years 2025, 2030, 2035 and 2040 increases in
demand occur due to growth in the District’s population and customer services.
11
Table 3
LAS District Revised
SB7x7 Water
Demand Projections
Year 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
Per Capita Use
(gpcd) 159 179 159 159 159 159 159
Population 65,550 68,630 71,710 74,790 77,870 80,950 84,030
Total Demand (mgd) 10.39 12.28 11.40 11.89 12.38 12.87 13.36
Total Demand (AFY) 11,648 13,772 12,782 13,331 13,880 14,429 14,978
Table 3 revised LAS demand projections do not specifically include increased water demands of
the Apple Campus 2 project, which were covered in a SB 610 WSA, February 1, 2012.
Total potable and non-potable estimated water use for Apple Campus 2 Phases 1 and 2 is 722
AFY for the typical commercial development scenario and 520 AFY for the proposed water
conserving Apple Campus 2 scenario. If recycled water is used to meet landscape irrigation and
cooling tower process water requirements, estimated POTABLE water use for either the typical
commercial development or Apple Campus 2 scenario will be less than recent existing site water
uses. The estimated potable water use for the typical commercial development scenario is 267
AFY (131.4 AFY less than existing use) and for the Apple Campus 2 scenario it is 242 AFY
(156.4 AFY less than existing use). If Apple Campus 2 does not use recycled water, then the net
increase in potable water use would be 323.6 AFY for typical commercial development and
121.6 AFY for the Apple Campus 2 water conserving scenario.
Cal Water continues in negotiations with Sunnyvale, South Bay Recycling, Apple, and SCVWD
to inter-tie the Sunnyvale recycled water system with that of South Bay Recycling. The plan
includes constructing a recycled water transmission line to the Apple Campus 2 site. Cal Water’s
LAS District manager indicates that there is a reasonable probability that this recycled water will
be implemented.
The Apple Campus 2 WSA conservatively assumed that all water use will be potable and that the
typical commercial development scenario will be implemented. In addition, it was assumed that
all new fixtures and other proposed water conserving systems required water savings as
presented in the WSA would be the typical development scenario with respect to water demand.
In the WSE it is assumed that recycled water will be used for non-potable water uses and that
potable water uses will be consistent with typical commercial development. Using these
assumptions, the net effect of the Apple Campus 2 project is to decrease demand by 131 AFY
The revised WSE LAS District and the revised Apple Campus 2 demand forecast is presented in
Table 4. It should be noted that annual LAS demand fluctuates depending on a number of factors.
LAS 2009 total demand was 14,092 AF. In 2010, it dropped to 11,648 AF, and in 2011, demand
further decreased to 11,358 AFY. In 2012, as shown in Table 4, it increased to 12,779 AFY. Of note,
the projected 2040 LAS demand with estimated Apple Campus 2 demand included is 643 AFY less
than the actual 2008 demand.
12
Table 4: LAS District Water Projected SB7x7 Water Demand + Apple Campus 2 - AF
2008
(Actual)
2012
(Actual) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
LAS District 15,490 12,779 13,772 12,782 13,331 13,880 14,429 14,978
Apple
Campus 2 0 0 -131 -131 -131 -131 -131 -131
Total 15,490 12,779 13,641 12,651 13,200 13,749 14,298 14,847
LAS District Demand Management
Cal Water is significantly expanding its water conservation programs. SBx7-7, CPUC directives
and a state water conservation organization are all focused on reducing urban water use through
implementation of water conservation measures. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
Regarding Urban Water Conservation in California offers three ways for a water supplier to
achieve conservation requirements: 1) implement a set of water conservation best management
practices (BMPs), 2) Flex Track compliance - implement conservation programs expected to
save an amount of water equal to what BMPs would result in, 3) reduce per capita water use.
For each BMP, the MOU established actions required by the water supplier (e.g. site surveys, fixture
and appliance rebates, water use budgets, volumetric pricing and conservation rate designs), an
implementation schedule, and level of effort. Additionally, the MOU established terms by which a
water supplier could opt out of implementing a BMP. BMPs are grouped into five categories. Two
categories (Utility Operations and Education) are “Foundational BMPs” because they are considered
essential water conservation activities and are adopted for implementation by all signatories to the
MOU as ongoing practices with no time limits. The remaining BMPs are “Programmatic BMPs” and
are organized into Residential, Commercial, Industrial, and Institutional (CII), and Landscape
categories. Table 5 lists BMPs by category. The requirements and coverage levels of each BMP are
in Exhibit 1 of the MOU. Cal Water’s Urban Water Conservation Council annual reports, which
detail BMP implementation, are included in its 2010 UWMP as Appendix G.
Table 5: MOU Best Management Practices
BMP Group BMP Name
1. Utility Operations Programs (F) Conservation Coordinator
Water Waste Prevention
Wholesale Agency Assistance Programs
Water Loss Control
Metering & Volumetric Rates
Retail Conservation Pricing
2. Education Programs (F) Public Information Programs
School Education Programs
3. Residential (P) Residential Assistance Program
Landscape Water Surveys
High Efficiency Clothes Washer Program
Watersense Toilet Program
Watersense Specifications for Residential Development
4. Commercial, Industrial, Institutional (P) Reduce baseline CII water use by 10% in 10 years
5. Landscape (P) Large Landscape Water Budget Programs
Large Landscape Water Surveys
F = Foundational BMP, P = Programmatic BMP
13
Cal Water has developed Water Conservation Master Plans (WCMP) for each of its districts. The
WCMP is a plan for water use reduction and describes specific conservation actions to be
implemented in a five year period. Major tasks include:
1. A complete review of State policies and development of a compliance strategy
2. Calculating all appropriate per capita targets
3. Determining water savings required from new programs
4. Performing an analysis of conservation programs
5. Developing a portfolio of conservation program actions
6. Creating a plan for monitoring and updating the WCMP
The LAS WCMP is included in Appendix G in the LAS District 2010 UWMP. Table 6 is a summary
of water conservation programs selected.
Table 6: Cal Water Conservation Programs
Program Name Description Target Market
CORE PROGRAMS
Rebate/Vouchers for toilets, urinals, and
clothes washers
Provide customer rebates for high-efficiency
toilets, urinals, and clothes washers
All customer segments
Residential Surveys Provide residential surveys to low-income
customers, high-bill customers, and upon customer
request or as pre-screen for participation in direct
install programs
All residential market
segments
Residential Showerhead/Water
Conservation Kit Distribution
Provide residential showerhead/water conservation
kits to customers upon request, as part of
residential surveys, and as part of school education
curriculum
All residential market
segments
Pop-Up Nozzle Irrigation System
Distribution
Offer high-efficiency pop-up irrigation nozzles
through customer vouchers or direct install.
All customer segments
Public Information/Education Provide conservation messaging via radio, bill
inserts, direct mail, and other appropriate methods.
Provide schools with age appropriate educational
materials and activities. Continue sponsorship of
Disney Planet Challenge program.
All customer segments
NON-CORE PROGRAMS
Toilet/Urinal Direct Install Program Offer direct installation programs for replacement
of non-HE toilets and urinals
All customer segments
Smart Irrigation Controller Contractor
Incentives
Offer contractor incentives for installation of smart
irrigation controllers
All customer segments
Large Landscape Water Use Reports Expand existing Cal Water Large Landscape Water
Use Report Program providing large landscape
customers with monthly water use reports and
budgets
Non-residential customers
with significant landscape
water use and potential
savings
Large Landscape Surveys & Irrigation
System Incentives
Provide surveys and irrigation system upgrade
financial incentives to large landscape customers
participating in the Large Landscape Water Use
Reports programs and other targeted customers
Non-residential customers
with significant landscape
water use and potential
savings
Food Industry Rebates/Vouchers Offer customer/dealer/distributor rebates/vouchers
for high-efficiency dishwashers, food steamers, ice
machines, and pre-rinse spray valves
Food and drink
establishments, institutional
food service providers
Cooling Tower Retrofits Offer customer/dealer/distributor rebates/vouchers
of cooling tower retrofits
Non-residential market
segments with significant
HVAC water use
Industrial Process Audits and Retrofit
Incentives
Offer engineering audits/surveys and financial
incentives for process water efficiency
improvement
Non-residential market
segments with significant
industrial process water uses
14
LAS District conservation programs and activity levels are shown in Table 7.
Table 7: LAS District Conservation Programs Being Implemented
Program Annual Activity Levels or Numbers
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
CORE PROGRAMS
Rebates/Vouchers
Toilets 340 340 340 520 520
Clothes Washers 750 750 750 790 790
Urinals 0 0 0 0 0
Customer Surveys/Audits 290 290 290 450 450
Conservation Kit Distribution 580 580 580 600 600
Pop-Up Nozzle Distribution 6,900 6,900 6,900 7,190 7,190
NON-CORE PROGRAMS
Direct Install Toilets/Urinals 1,630 1,630 1,630 1,830 1,830
Smart Irrigation Controller Vendor Incentives 180 180 180 410 410
Large Landscape Water Use Reports 0 0 0 0 0
Large Landscape Surveys/Incentives 40 40 40 40 40
Commercial Kitchen Rebates/Vouchers 0 0 0 50 40
Cooling Tower/Process Water Retrofit Incentives 0 0 0 0 0
Cal Water has also developed Water Shortage Allocation Plans (WSAP), which are plans of action to
reduce water demand should significant water supply shortages occur, primarily due to drought.
These actions may be implemented for several months or several years depending on circumstances.
The WSAP differs from the WCMP, which is focused on achieving permanent reductions in per
capita water use by Cal Water’s customers and is not driven by significant short or long reductions in
supply. In the short-term, the WSAP assists Cal Water in further reducing demand to match any
possible significant reductions in supply.
Cal Water has developed a four stage approach as shown in Table 8 to drought response that
corresponds to specific levels of water supply shortage. At higher stages, Cal Water will become
more aggressive in requiring water use reductions from its customers. The decision to move to a
higher stage is based on consideration of a variety of factors including wholesale supply,
availability of alternative supplies, time of year and regional coordinated activities. In each
progressive stage, actions taken in earlier stages are carried through to the next stage either at the
same or an increased intensity level, thereby becoming more restrictive.
Table 8: Cal Water Supply Shortage Reduction Stages
Stage Supply Reduction %
1 5 to 10
2 10 to 20
3 20 to 35
4 35 to 50+
15
Proposed Cupertino GP Amendment LAS District Demand Projections
Details of the proposed land use changes for the general plan amendment are provided in the Project
EIR.
Estimated water demands for the proposed GP amendment developments in Cal Water’s service
area for Alternative C are based on the data in Table 2 and the following unit demand factors for
the four categories of land use. It is noted that these demand factors are based on “traditional”
water use rates and do not assume implementation of water conservation measures as discussed
in the previous section. The resulting demand projections for the four classes of development
defined in the proposed Cupertino GP amendment can be viewed as conservative. In fact, the
City will require developers to incorporate water conserving fixtures and landscaping into
specific development plans, which should result in lower water usage than projected here.
Alternative C
Residential Dwelling Units:
The 2010 LAS UWMP indicates an average multi- family dwelling unit indoor water use at
137.2 gallons/day/dwelling unit.
For the Cupertino proposed GP Amendment: 3,484 dwelling units x 137.2 gpd/dwelling unit =
478,000gallons/day or 536 AFY.
Since the WSE LAS demand forecast is based on higher rate of population increase for the next
25 years than was used in the 2010 UWMP, it is reasonable to assume that some percentage of
the projected increase in water demand calculated for the GP Amendment is included. The WSE
population forecast for the LAS District is 84,030. The 2010 LAS UWMP forecast is 62,650.
The difference is 21,380 people.
Cupertino represents about 20% of the service area of the LAS District. If population density is
uniform throughout the district, then the WSE projected population increase for the LAS District
area in Cupertino would be 0.2 x 21,380 = 4,276 people. The proposed number of new housing
units in the Cupertino GP amendment in the LAS district is 3,484. This would result in the
average number of occupants being 1.2 persons per dwelling unit, which is low. A more
representative number of persons per dwelling unit is 2.2.Using this figure results in a projected
LAS Cupertino GP amendment population increase of 7,665 people. If the WSE forecast for the
LAS District includes 4,276 people, then the net increase in population due to proposed GP
amendment development is 3,389 (7,665 – 4,276) people. The projected water demand above
the WSE projection for LAS equals 3,389 people x 0.72 x 159 gal/day/person = 388,000
gal/day or 435 AFY. (Note: Cal Water data shows that residential water use per capita is about
72% of total per capita water use.)
Therefore, the additional demand for residential growth is estimated to be 435 AFY.
Office Space:
Cal Water estimates that the average floor space per employee ratio is 300 sq ft/person.
Data from the Urban Water Supply Handbook (McGraw-Hill 2002), Table 5.9 (Average Rates of
Non-residential Water Use from Establishment Level Data) is used as a reference here. Water
16
use rates by employee vary widely depending upon the industry or business. For a mix of
business, financial, public, and services a representative average is 90 gallons/day/employee.
For the Cupertino proposed GP Amendment, estimated water use for office space is:
3,785,000sq ft/ 300 sq ft/employee x 90 gallons/day/employee = 1,135,500 gallons/day or 1,273
AFY.
Commercial (retail goods stores, services, restaurants, coffee shops, groceries):
In Cal Water’s Dominguez district, Cal Water observed good agreement between residential
water use rates calculated by the County Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles (CSDLA) and water
use rates derived from its own customer data.
For various retail commercial activities, CSDLA data yields the following:
Dry goods and services: 0.11 gallons/day/sq ft
Restaurants: 1.10 gallons/day/sq ft
Groceries and supermarkets: 0.65 gallons/day/sq ft
Sports or athletic club: 0.85 gallons/day/sq ft
No specific breakdown of commercial uses is available at this time, therefore, the following mix
is assumed for the GP amendment:
Dry goods and services: 70% x 972,734 sq ft x 0.11 g/d/sq ft = 74,900 gallons/day
Restaurants: 15% x 972,734sq ft x 1.10 g/d/sq ft = 160,500 gallons/day
Groceries and supermarkets: 10% x 972,734 sq ft x 0.65 g/d/sq ft = 63,230 gallons/day
Athletic Club: 5% x 972,734 sq ft x 0.85 g/d/sq ft = 41,340 gallons/day
Total Commercial water demand: 339,970 gallons/day or 381 AFY.
Hotels:
Water use for hotels with a restaurant is estimated to be 0.50 gallons/day/sq ft. The estimated
total hotel space per room is estimated to be 390 sq ft.
Therefore, estimated water demand is: 1,339 rooms x 390 sq ft/room x 0.50 gallons per day/sq ft
= 261,100 gallons/day or 293 AFY
Landscape Irrigation:
It is assumed that there will be landscaped areas for all proposed development and that the areas
to be irrigated are 15% of the total residential, office, commercial and hotel development
proposed in the GP amendment.
A very general estimate of that area is:
0.15 ((3,484 dwelling units x 1,200 sq ft/dwelling unit) + 3,785,000 sq ft + 972,734 sq ft +
(1,339 rooms x 390 sq ft/room))
= 0.15 (4,180,800 + 3,785,000+ 972,734 + 522,210)
17
= 1,419,112 sq ft/43,560 sq ft/acre = 32.6 acres
It is assumed that each dwelling unit will have an average lot size of 1,200 sq ft.
In Cal Water’s mid-peninsula district (San Mateo and San Carlos) metered sales records for two
landscape irrigation systems for existing mixed use commercial centers for 34 months was 3,615
gallons/ day/acre. For the Cupertino GP amendment plan, this irrigation rate is used.
Therefore, estimated landscape irrigation water use is 32.6 acres x 3,615 gallons/day/acre =
117,850 gallons/day or 132 AFY
Total estimated Cal Water LAS District build out in 2040 GP amendment water demand = 435 +
1,273 + 381 + 293 + 132 = 2,514AFY.
The historic water use factors used to make the above proposed GP Amendment water demand
forecast do not take into account requirements for water conservation measures to be
incorporated into new development. Therefore, it is highly probable that new development
conservation measure implementation will reduce projected water demand. Accordingly, it
assumed here that proposed GP Amendment demand will be reduced by 15%. So total LAS
District GP amendment water demand at build out for Alternative C is estimated to be:
0.85 x 2,514 = 2,137 AFY
Alternative A
Following is a demand estimate at build out for the proposed GP Plan Amendment Alternative
A. It was developed by calculating the reduced percentage of development for each use
classification and applying it to the demand estimated for Alternative C.
Residential: 0.365 x 536 AFY = 196 AFY
Office: 0.25 x 1,273 AFY = 318 AFY
Commercial: 0.648 x 381 AFY = 247 AFY
Hotel: 0.448 x 293 AFY = 131 AFY
Landscape: 0.43 x 132 AFY = 57 AFY
Total Estimated Demand: 949 AFY
Applying a 15% reduction factor due to water conservation measures to be incorporated into new
development, the total LAS GP amendment water demand at build out for Alternative A is
estimated to be: 0.85 x 949 = 807 AFY or 37.8 % of Alternative C.
Alternative B
Following is a demand estimate at build out for the proposed GP Plan Amendment Alternative B.
It was developed by calculating the reduced percentage of development for each use
classification and applying it to the demand estimated for Alternative C.
Residential: 0.712 x 536 AFY = 382 AFY
Office: 0.622 x 1,273 AFY = 792 AFY
Commercial: 1.00 x 381 AFY = 381 AFY
18
Hotel: 0.626 x 293 AFY = 183 AFY
Landscape: 0.74 x 132 AFY = 98 AFY
Total Estimated Demand: 1,836 AFY
Applying a 15% reduction factor due to water conservation measures to be incorporated into new
development, the total LAS GP amendment water demand at build out for Alternative B is
estimated to be: 0.85 x 1,836 = 1,560 AFY or 73.0 % of Alternative C.
Since Alternative C represents the greatest increase in demand, it is used in evaluating the
adequacy of water supply. If future supply is adequate for Alternative C then it will also be for
Alternatives A and B.
Proposed Cupertino GP Amendment and LAS District Demand Analysis
As discussed in developing the revised LAS District demand, a higher level of population growth
was projected for the next 25 years than in the 2010 LAS UWMP due to the 18.9% population
increase between 2000 and 2010 based on US Census data. However, stronger water conservation
targets in terms of average water usage per capita are projected - 159 gpcd for 2020 rather than 193
gpcd as indicated in the 2010 UWMP. This is due to Cal Water data showing that per capital water
usage has declined in the past 5 years. For the period from 2009 to 2013, it averaged 136 gpcd. Even
though the Apple Campus 2 demand project using the most conservative assumption was added to
the revised LAS demand forecast, the 2040 projected LAS total demand is15, 302 AFY compared to
the actual 15,490 AFY for 2008.
For the proposed Cupertino GP Amendment, it is assume d that projected increased water demand is
additive to the LAS District and Apple Campus 2 demands. Also, it is assumed that development will
occur linearly over 25 year period starting in 2015. Therefore, the five year increase for proposed GP
Amendment demand is 2,137/5 = 427.4 AFY
Table 9 presents the combined projected water demand for the LAS District, Apple Campus 2
and Cupertino GP Amendment.
Table 9: LAS District Water Projected SB7x7 Water Demand + Apple Campus 2 +
Cupertino GP Amendment - AF
2008
(Actual)
2012
(Actual) 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
LAS District
+ Apple
Campus 2
15,490 12,779 13,641 12,651 13,200 13,749 14,298 14,847
Cupertino
GP
Amendment
0 0 0 427 855 1,282 1,710 2,137
Total 15,490 12,779 14,065 13,078 14,055 15,031 16,008 16,984
LAS District Water Supply
Water supply for the LAS District is a combination of groundwater from wells in the District and
purchased treated water from the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD). For the past five
19
years, approximately 32 % of supply has come from groundwater production and 68% from
SCVWD.
In a given year, the amount of groundwater production versus purchased treated water varies
depending on the supply available from SCVWD. SCVWD imports surface water to its service
area from the South Bay Aqueduct of the State Water Project (SWP), the San Felipe Division of
the federal Central Valley Project (CVP) and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission’s
(SFPUC) Regional Water System. However, Cal Water only receives SCVWD water from the
SWP and CVP sources.
Purchased SCVWD water projections are based on historical trends being extended to 2040 and
include “Non-Contract” water. The SCVWD approved treated water delivery schedule expected
to increase by about 30 AF per year.
Groundwater supply projections are based on groundwater production matched to meet the
difference between LAS District demand and supply deliveries from SCVWD in a given year.
Cal Water has more than adequate well capacity to meet projected demands through 2040. As
wells that reach the end of their useful life are taken out of service, they are replaced with new
wells.
Table 10 presents the supply plan to match the projected LAS District + Apple Campus 2 +
Cupertino GP Amendment demand forecast. The assumption is that for each five year increment,
Cal Water will get an increased delivery from SCVWD to supply the difference between amount
of groundwater pumped and anticipated demand. The amount of groundwater pumped is the
difference between projected total demand and the projected supply from SCVWD.
Table 10: LAS District Projected Water Supplies
(AFY)
Water Supply Sources 2012 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
SCVWD Purchased Water 8,887 10,2009,70010,20011,200 12,120 13,000
Groundwater Wells 3,8923,8653,3783,8553,831 3,888 3,984
Recycled Water ----- - -
Total 12,779 14,065 13,078 14,055 15,031 16,008 16,984
SCVWD Purchased Water
SCVWD owns and operates three separate surface water treatment plants (the Penitencia,
Rinconada, and Santa Teresa water treatment plants) that are supplied by surface water supplies
from local runoff and imported water from the CVP, SWP and SFPUC. Treated water is
delivered to the LAS District from the Rinconada treatment plant through a large-diameter high
pressure transmission pipeline that runs through Cupertino and along Foothill Expressway. This
transmission pipeline, commonly referred to as the West Pipeline, has branch lines that distribute
water to the cities of Santa Clara and Mountain View ("distributaries").
20
Cal Water has a contract to 2035 with SCVWD to purchase treated surface water and convey it
to the LAS District. SCVWD “Contract” water is delivered through four connections with its
transmission system. These connections are called the "Vallco", "Granger", "Farndon", and
"Covington" turnouts. The Farndon and Granger turnouts are located directly on the West
Pipeline, while the Tantau-Vallco turnout is located on the Santa Clara Distributary, and the
Covington connection is located on the Mountain View Distributary. Each of these turnouts is
equipped with pressure and flow control devices that provide a hydraulic transition between their
respective delivery main and the LAS district distribution system.
When surface water supplies are abundant (above normal hydrologic years generally), SCVWD
makes available for sale "Non-Contract" water in order to promote increased storage in
groundwater aquifers in the region. Because there is usually a lower cost for purchasing "Non-
Contract" water, the LAS District reduces production of groundwater and increases its purchase
of treated surface water from SCVWD during these periods. This has the effect of “banking”
groundwater. When surface water supplies are more limited due to drought, SCVWD can and
has imposed both voluntary and mandatory reductions in amount of its treated water it delivers to
its customers including the LAS District. During periods of SCVWD supply reduction and
because of increased groundwater storage, the LAS District increases groundwater pumping to
make up the difference.
Because SCVWD recharges groundwater aquifers within its boundaries, it levies an assessment
on the production of groundwater to the utilities it supplies to cover the costs associated with this
program. During normal hydrologic periods, the groundwater pumping assessment is set so that
the cost of pumping groundwater approximately equals the cost of purchased treated surface
water from SCVWD. Because it is unknown whether "Non-Contract" water will be available
when the purchase water schedules are prepared, and because "Non-Contract" water is only
available in the months between October and April of the upcoming year, scheduling of
deliveries is set to maximize the delivery of purchased water in the summer and utilize
groundwater production capacity to its fullest during all other periods. This scheduling pattern
enables the LAS District to take advantage of the economic incentive provided by the sale of
"Non-Contract" water and in turn assist SCVWD in accomplishing the goal of groundwater
storage of surplus supplies. SCVWD has scheduling restrictions regarding the purchase of direct
deliveries. These restrictions currently limit the "Peak Day" deliveries to 180 percent of the
average day delivery, and the maximum monthly delivery cannot exceed fifteen percent of the
annual scheduled delivery.
SCVWD prepared a 2012 Water Supply and Infrastructure Master Plan (WSIP) which indicates
that the basis for its sustainable water supply strategy is to: 1) secure existing supplies and
infrastructure, 2) optimize use of existing supplies and infrastructure, and 3) increase recycling
and conservation. The WSIP states it will “secure existing supplies and facilities for
future generations”. In addition, SCVWD will make more effective use of its
existing assets. It is committed to working with its retail utilities to meet Silicon Valley’s future
increases in water demand through conservation and recycling. The 2012 WSIP takes into
account climate changes and reduced imported supplies and is based on the 2010 UWMPs
prepared by its member utilities. It is intended to be responsive to stakeholder needs and provide
adequate supplies and delivery infrastructure through 2035. Baseline water supplies are expected
21
to increase from the current average of about 398,000 AFY to an average of 421,000 AFY in
2035. The increase in baseline supplies is due to removal of operating restrictions on existing
reservoirs and increased non‐potable water recycling. Baseline conservation savings are
projected to increase from about 53,000 AFY in 2011 to about 99,000 AFY by 2030. These
savings are expected to reduce demands on the water supply system and the need for more
capital‐intensive improvements. SCVWD indicates that adequate investment in its infrastructure
system is critical to supply reliability. Some key elements of SCVWD’s plan follow:
1) Groundwater Recharge: new ponds will add about 3,300 AFY on average.
2) Reservoir Pipeline: A connection between Lexington Reservoir and the raw water
system will provide greater flexibility in using existing local water supplies and will
allow surface water from Lexington Reservoir to be put to beneficial use elsewhere in the
county, especially when combined with the indirect potable reuse project. In addition, the
pipeline will enable SCVWD to capture some wet‐weather flows that would otherwise
flow to the Bay. The pipeline will provide an average annual yield of 1,500 AFY.
3) Imported Water Reoperations: SCVWD will re-operate its Semitropic Groundwater
Bank when it is nearly full and SCVWD water supply needs are otherwise met to sell or
exchange up to 50,000 AFY of stored water. This would create additional space in the
Semitropic Groundwater Bank for carryover of supplies during wetter years, maximize
the value of SCVWD’s existing assets (imported water contracts and investment in the
Semitropic Groundwater Bank), and potentially help fund investments in infrastructure
and additional local supplies.
4) Increase Recycling and Conservation: SCVWD’s supply sustainability strategy relies
upon development of indirect potable reuse to provide most of the new water supply to
meet future water needs. The WSIP assumes that at least 20,000 AFY of advanced treated
recycled water will be used for groundwater recharge by 2030.
In a discussion on April 22, 2014, Tracy Hemmeter, Senior Project Manager and principal author of
the WSIP, indicates that SCVWD’s retail utilities will be preparing updated UWMPs in 2015. In
turn, SCWVD will update its WSIP in 2016 using retail utility updated projected demands for
determining SCVWD supply requirements. The subject of denser redevelopment with increased
water supply needs within some of the communities supplied by SCVWD was discussed. Whether
demands associated with changed development plans will result in additional supply requirements
and how best those might be met, will be reassessed in SCVWD’s 2016 plan update. At this time,
however, SCVWD believes it has adequate supplies and delivery infrastructure to meet retail utility
demands as projected in the 2010 UWMPs for normal, dry and drought conditions through 2035.
LAS District Groundwater
The LAS District has 24 wells, 20 of which are currently active and operational. The active
wells have a combined design capacity of 14,805 gpm, which is 21.3 MGD if operated 24 hours
a day or 23,881 AFY. While it is not realistic to operate all wells continuously, the LAS District
has produced 650 to 750 AF in a given month or about 7 to 8 mgd, or approximately 1/3 of well
design capacity. Annualized, 750 AF/month is 9,000 AFY, which is 2.4 times projected well
production for 2040 as shown in Table 11.
22
Maximum day demands, both current and projected, are supplied by deliveries of treated water
from SCVWD. Production records show that average day demand reached a high of 13.83 MGD
(15,504 AFY) in 2008 and has a ten-year average of 13.36 MGD, while maximum day demand
reached 28.72 MGD with a ten-year average of 24.91 MGD. These values result in a typical
average day to maximum day ratio of 1.86:1. The LAS District distribution system is designed to
deliver anticipated maximum day demands.
Average static groundwater elevations in the District have remained relatively constant since the
SCVWD began its recharge program. Over the period of record, average static levels have
fluctuated due to hydrologic conditions. The extended multi-year drought in the early 1990’s
reduced groundwater surplus water and caused a 40-foot decline in static groundwater elevation.
Drought recovery began in 1992, with an increase in the average static groundwater elevation to
pre-drought levels, as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: LAS District Well Level Average (Static)
The historical quantity of LAS district groundwater pumped is shown in Table 11.
Table 11: LAS District Groundwater Pumped – AF
Basin 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Santa Clara Subbasin 4,434 4,325 4,161 5,200 3,396
% of Total Water Supply 31% 28% 27% 37% 29%
23
Basin Boundaries and Hydrology
As described in DWR Bulletin 118 California’s Groundwater, the Los Altos District is located in
the Santa Clara sub-basin of the Santa Clara Valley Groundwater Basin. The Santa Clara sub-
basin occupies a structural trough parallel to the northwest trending Coast Ranges. The Diablo
Range bounds it on the East and the Santa Cruz Mountains form the Western border of Santa
Clara County to the groundwater divide near Morgan Hill. The dominant geo-hydrologic feature
is a large inland valley. The valley is drained to the north by tributaries to the San Francisco Bay
including Coyote Creek, the Guadalupe River, and Los Gatos Creek. Additional details of the
basin are given in the DWR's Groundwater Bulletin 118, see Appendix D.
Groundwater Management Plan
Groundwater quality and quantity in the Los Altos District are actively managed by SCVWD.
SCVWD updates its Groundwater Management Plan (GMP) periodically.
Recycled Water
Use of Recycled water helps reduce groundwater pumping, which can result in an increase in
groundwater storage and an increase the sustainability of this supply source. Currently, no
recycled is used in the LAS District. As previously discussed, this may change with the
implementation of a recycled water supply for the Apple Campus 2 project.
The City of Palo Alto administers the Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant. Palo
Alto, Los Altos, Mountain View and their sub-partnering sewer agencies, East Palo Alto,
Stanford University, and Los Altos Hills share in the proportionate costs of upkeep for the Palo
Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant.
Each city owns, operates, and maintains its own collection system. The Palo Alto Regional
Water Quality Control Plant owns and maintains the wastewater treatment plant and effluent
line. Nearly 80% of wastewater is from residential customers and the balance from industrial and
commercial uses.
The City of Sunnyvale operates and maintains its sewer system for residential, commercial, and
some industrial customers. Collected wastewater is discharged to trunk sewers owned and
operated by the City and conveyed to the Sunnyvale Water Pollution Control Plant for treatment.
The Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant provides primary, secondary, and tertiary
treatment which includes chemical coagulation and dual media filtration. Treatment plant
capacity is 39 mgd but current flows average 26 mgd. Treated effluent is discharged to San
Francisco Bay. The Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant can treat 2 mgd to meet
Title 22 standards for unrestricted beneficial reuse. Recycled water is used to irrigate municipal
golf courses in Palo Alto and Mountain View and Greer Park in Palo Alto. Recycled water is
used by tanker trucks to provide dust control at construction sites and for irrigation. Up to 3.7
million gallons per month of recycled water is used during the winter months to supply fresh
water to a marsh southwest of the plant. The Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant
does not provide recycled water to any Cal Water service areas.
24
The Sunnyvale Water Pollution Control Plant provides wastewater service for the City of
Sunnyvale. Treatment includes primary, secondary, and tertiary processes followed by
chlorination and dechlorination prior to disposal to the San Francisco Bay. The Sunnyvale
treatment plant has a treatment capacity of 29.5 mgd but currently receives an average flow of
16.9 mgd. Under Phase 1, the plant supplies recycled water to meet a peak demand of 2 mgd for
landscaping and some industrial uses. Recycled water is provided to City of Sunnyvale areas
that are not in the LAS District service area. As part of Phase II of the Sunnyvale’s reclamation
plan, facilities to supply recycled water to parks and industrial areas located in the north part of
the city near the treatment plant are being constructed. Since Cal Water’s LAS District service
area is in the southern part of Sunnyvale, providing recycled water to that area has not been part
of the City’s plans for expansion of the system.
South Bay Water Recycling (SBWR) operates a large recycled water transmission and
distribution system consisting of over 120 miles of pipe serving the cities of Milpitas, Santa
Clara and San José. During the summer, an average of 14 MGD of recycled water is delivered to
over 600 customers. The recycled water is provided by the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution
Control Plant, which treats wastewater for over 1,500,000 people in the 300-square mile area
encompassing San Jose, Santa Clara, Milpitas, Campbell, Cupertino, Los Gatos, Saratoga, and
Monte Sereno. The treatment plant, located in Alviso at the southernmost tip of the San
Francisco Bay, can treat up to 167 MGD of wastewater. About 90% of treated water is
discharged through the Artesian Slough into South San Francisco Bay and the remaining 10% is
recycled by SBWR for urban landscape and agricultural irrigation and industrial processes that
can use non-potable water.
The Palo Alto Regional Water Quality Control Plant reclamation program plans to expand its
recycled water system when additional funding becomes available. However, a preliminary
assessment of this source indicates it is too distant from the Apple Campus 2 site to be feasible as
a source of supply.
Cal Water continues to be involved in negotiations with Sunnyvale, South Bay Recycling, Apple,
and SCVWD to inter-tie the Sunnyvale recycled water system with that of South Bay Recycling.
The plan includes constructing a recycled water transmission line to the Apple Campus 2 site. If
the plan is implemented, Cal Water will be the recycled water retailer to the Apple Campus site.
Cal Water’s LAS District manager indicates that there is a reasonable probability that a recycled
water supply will be implemented.
LAS District Supply Adequacy and Reliability Assessment
This section combines and compares previously presented information on projected demand and
supplies for the LAS district to address the question of whether LAS district supplies are adequate
and reliable for the next 26 years for normal hydrologic conditions, one dry year and multiple dry
year periods.
Figure 4 compares annual rainfall from 1970 to 2010 (40 years) to the historic average and
shows the demand per service for each year. Water use generally increases in the first years of a
dry period, but after increased conservation efforts are implemented, demand per service
decreases.
25
Figure 4: LAS Area Annual Rainfall and LAS District Water Demand Per Service
53
.
2
%
-4
2
.
8
%
-5
.
5
%
59
.
6
%
-2
1
.
7
%
-2
5
.
7
%
-5
1
.
9
%
-3
2
.
2
%
15
.
7
%
6.
2
%
-6
.
0
%
14
.
1
%
63
.
3
%
11
2
.
9
%
-2
7
.
2
%
-3
8
.
0
%
5.
8
%
-5
0
.
7
%
-3
7
.
3
%
-4
4
.
8
%
-4
7
.
2
%
-1
7
.
7
%
3.
5
%
25
.
8
%
-1
3
.
1
%
53
.
4
%
35
.
3
%
5.
4
%
78
.
3
%
-2
7
.
8
%
-7
.
5
%
2.
0
%
-4
.
8
%
-5
5
.
9
%
-1
4
.
6
%
29
.
5
%
18
.
7
%
-5
3
.
5
%
-9
.
9
%
-1
3
.
7
%
24
.
0
%
23
.
4
0
8.
7
3
14
.
4
3
24
.
3
7
11
.
9
5
11
.
3
5
7.
3
4
10
.
3
5
17
.
6
6
16
.
2
1
14
.
3
6
17
.
4
3
24
.
9
4
32
.
5
1
11
.
1
1
9.
4
6
16
.
1
5
7.
5
3
9.
5
7
8.
4
3
8.
0
6
12
.
5
6
15
.
8
0
19
.
2
1
13
.
2
7
23
.
4
3
20
.
6
6
16
.
0
9
27
.
2
2
11
.
0
2
14
.
1
2
15
.
5
7
14
.
5
4
6.
7
4
13
.
0
4
19
.
7
8
18
.
1
3
7.
1
0
13
.
7
6
13
.
1
8
18
.
9
4
-100%
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
19
7
0
19
7
1
19
7
2
19
7
3
19
7
4
19
7
5
19
7
6
19
7
7
19
7
8
19
7
9
19
8
0
19
8
1
19
8
2
19
8
3
19
8
4
19
8
5
19
8
6
19
8
7
19
8
8
19
8
9
19
9
0
19
9
1
19
9
2
19
9
3
19
9
4
19
9
5
19
9
6
19
9
7
19
9
8
19
9
9
20
0
0
20
0
1
20
0
2
20
0
3
20
0
4
20
0
5
20
0
6
20
0
7
20
0
8
20
0
9
20
1
0
Calendar Year
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
o
f
A
v
e
r
a
ge
R
a
i
n
f
a
l
l
-
24,000
48,000
72,000
96,000
120,000
144,000
168,000
192,000
216,000
240,000
264,000
288,000
312,000
336,000
360,000 Co
m
b
i
n
e
d
D
e
m
a
n
d
p
e
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
(
g
a
l
l
o
n
s
/
y
e
a
r
)
Rainfall Totals (inches)
Average Annual Rainfall Total: 15.63 inches
Demand per Service
The statewide drought of 1987-1992 illustrates this pattern. Data show that in the Los Altos area
the drought began as far back as 1984, with a corresponding increase in demand per service at
the beginning and a consistent drop as the drought persisted. Water use has generally increased
back to pre-drought levels since this time. The more recent drought from 2007-2009 also shows
this pattern.
A normal hydrologic year occurred in 2001 when precipitation was approximately 2 percent
above the historic average. The most recent driest year occurred in 2003 when the rainfall was
approximately 56 percent below average (6.7 inches). This is taken as the single dry year shown
in Table 12. The most recent multiple dry-water years are based on the statewide drought
between 2006 and 2009.
Table 12: LAS District: Basis for Water Year Type
Water Year Type Base Year(s)
Normal Water Year 2001
Single-Dry Water Year 2003
Multiple-Dry Water Years 2006-2009
26
Annual customer demand in normal, single dry and multiple dry years is shown as overall
average demand per service for the LAS District in Table 13. Water use follows a typical pattern
where demand may decrease than slightly increase but then decreases more significantly as dry
years continue. Reduction in water use is the result of increased conservation efforts by water
providers and general public awareness of drought conditions and their effect on water supplies.
Table 13: LAS District Customer Demand Variability – gal/service/yr
Average /
Normal Water Year
Single Dry
Water Year
Multiple Dry Water Years
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
274,797 265,969 259,893 276,800 277,271 251,879
% of Normal 97% 95% 101% 101% 92%
Historically, Non-Contract water has supplied a large portion of Cal Water’s total supply
requirements. However, this source is not considered a normally available supply. Non-contract
water deliveries have a five year average of 3,368 AF, which was 22 percent of the total supply
to the Los Altos District for this period. Non-contract water will be the first source of supply to
be eliminated and will act as a buffer in the event of a single dry year or multi-year drought.
During multiple dry years, decreased purchase water is made up by pumping stored groundwater.
Currently, active wells in the LAS District produce approximately 30 percent of their design
capacity. Any reduction in non-contract water is replaced by groundwater pumping.
According to SCVWD’s UWMP, if reductions in SWP and CVP deliveries occur due to drought
events, the diversion of water to percolation ponds will be curtailed first, followed by agricultural
deliveries, and finally urban water deliveries. When this happens an increased reliance will be
put on production from groundwater reserves, which were increased in years of surplus surface
water deliveries. Because of this policy, SCVWD indicates that it will be able to meet all of its
urban treated water demands by shifting supply sources even during multiple dry year periods
Cal Water’s well capacity is sufficient to accommodate reductions in treated water from
SCVWD. The LAS distribution system has the ability to meet demands under reduced deliveries
from SCVWD and increased use of Cal Water wells. LAS district groundwater supplies are not
limited during multiple dry year periods. An adequate supply to meet projected demands is
expected to be available during multiple-dry year events. During future dry periods customer
water use patterns are expected to be similar to past events.
Normal Hydrologic Year
In normal hydrologic years, Non-Contract water is expected to be available. Cal Water also
expects increases in approved SCVWD deliveries will eventually reduce availability of Non-
Contract water. According to the SCVWD 2012 WIP, LAS district projected water scheduled
delivery amounts will be available through at least 2035.
27
As previously indicated, the LAS district has historically pumped only a fraction of its total
annualized well capacity, leaving the balance in groundwater storage. Because of this banking
practice, there is an adequate supply of stored groundwater in the aquifers supplying LAS district
wells.
Total groundwater supplied is the quantity necessary to make up the difference between LAS
District demand and SCVWD supplies – both scheduled and Non-Contract deliveries. Hence,
total supply always equals projected demand for any given year. A normal hydrologic year
supply is considered the same as the SBx7-7 target water demand projections plus the Apple
Campus 2 demand (conservative assumptions). Table 14 shows that groundwater will be reliable
throughout the planning horizon of this UWMP and that no supply deficiencies are expected.
Table 14: LAS District Normal Hydrologic Year: LAS District + Apple Campus 2 +
Cupertino GP Amendment Demand and Supply Comparison - AF
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
Total Demand 14,065 13,078 14,055 15,031 16,008 16,984
SCVWD Supply 10,200 9,700 10,200 11,200 12,120 13,000
LAS Groundwater 3,865 3,378 3,855 3,831 3,888 3,984
Total Supply 14,065 13,078 14,055 15,031 16,008 16,984
Difference 0 0 0 0 0 0
Single Dry-Year
In single dry years Cal Water can expect a reduction in Non-Contract water and may possibly see
a reduction in firm scheduled deliveries. Pumping restrictions in the Delta due to Judge
Wanger’s Decision could also have a greater impact on imported supplies during single dry
years. But if any reduction in scheduled deliveries were to occur, the needed supply could be
made up by pumping stored groundwater.
During a single dry year it is unlikely that SCVWD would request a reduction in its retailer’s
water demand. SCVWD maintains carryover storage in its reservoirs, locally stored groundwater
reserves, and has access of up to 50,000 AFY of drought supplies stored as groundwater in the
Semitropic Groundwater Bank. According to SCVWD’s 2010 UWMP there will be a 5 percent
shortfall in treated water contract deliveries in 2020 and 2025. After this time it is expected that
projects resulting from their Water Master Plan will create sufficient additional supplies so that
contract deliveries can be met during single dry years. It is assumed that groundwater will
provide the necessary supply to meet dry year demands if purchased water reductions are
required.
Based on the data in Table 15, LAS district demand for a single-dry year would be 97% of a
normal hydrologic year demand. Cal Water has also observed in other one-year dry periods that
demand has increased above normal hydrologic year demand. In light of this uncertainty,
demand values for one dry year are treated here as the same as for normal hydrologic conditions.
Using SCVWD’s 2015 projected supply as a reference year, a 5% reduction in 2020 would result
in an available supply of 9,690 AF, which is 190 AF more than is projected as a requirement. For
2025, the 9,690 AF would be 650 AF less than projected if groundwater pumping were to remain
28
constant. Therefore, increased groundwater pumping will supply the difference in order to meet
2025 demand. Since no reduction in SCVWD supplies are anticipated, the groundwater supply
remains the same. Therefore, the combination of pumped groundwater and purchased water will
be sufficient to meet projected single dry year demands.
Table 15: LAS District One Dry Year: LAS District + Apple Campus 2 + Cupertino GP
Amendment Demand and Supply Comparison - AF
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
Total Demand 14,065 13,078 14,055 15,031 16,008 16,984
SCVWD Supply 10,200 9,700 9,690 11,200 12,120 13,000
LAS Groundwater 3,865 3,378 4,365 3,831 3,888 3,984
Total Supply 14,065 13,078 14,055 15,031 16,008 16,984
Difference 0 0 0 0 0 0
Multiple Dry Year Period
SCVWD gives highest priority to delivery of Contract water to urban water retailers and
indicates it can deliver 100% of its contracted supply obligations even during multiple dry year
periods. However, during such periods, SCVWD will reduce or eliminate deliveries of Non-
Contract water. If drought conditions warrant, SCVWD will reduce or eliminate surface water
recharging to aquifers within its service area. If further reductions are necessary, deliveries to
agricultural customers will be reduced or eliminated. Deliveries to SCVWD urban water
retailers are the last to be affected by drought conditions. Based on SCVWD supplies and
policies, Cal Water expects that 100% of Contract water will be delivered to the LAS District
during a multiple dry year period. Cal Water also plans on pumping its LAS district groundwater
supplies so that there will be no reduction in total supply available to meet water demands.
Modeling work reported in SCVWD’s 2010 UWMP uses the 6 year period from 1987-1992 as
the baseline for future multiple dry year periods. Results indicate that supplies would be 100%
reliable through the first three years of a similar dry year period. In the fourth year there is a
maximum shortfall of 10% in 2035. For years 5 and 6, the projected shortfall in supply ranges
between 10% and 20%. As recommended in DWR’s UWMP guidance document, Cal Water’s
multiple dry year supply and demand comparison is based on the first three years of a multiple
dry year period. For the fourth year, reduction of 10% in Contract water delivery is assumed and
the difference will either be made up by inducing more customer demand reduction through
intensified water conservation measures and/or pumping more groundwater from LAS district
wells. Therefore, Cal Water believes its supplies are 100% reliable during multiple dry year
periods through at least 2035.
In the following multiple dry year period analysis, normal supply of Contract Water is expected
to be available, but Non-Contract deliveries are not. This assumes that reservoir carryover
storage in SWP, CVP, and local systems is average prior to the drought. At the beginning of a
prolonged drought period, it is also assumed that there are adequate supplies of groundwater
stored in the aquifers pumped.
29
Cal Water also assumes that in future multiple dry year periods, SCVWD would initially ask for
voluntary reductions in supply requested by 10%. The magnitude of reductions requested could
increase depending on the degree and duration of the drought. SCVWD considers its
groundwater and imported supplies as one source and does not distinguish between water
sources when asking for demand reductions from its retailers. As a result, retail agencies would
be asked to reduce total demand, not just imported water use. Cal Water expects that its LAS
District customers will be able to achieve these requested reductions in water use. In the LAS
District, total annual water use per customer is expected to be lower than in previous dry year
periods due to the greater investment in water conservation programs that will be implemented in
coming years. As seen in the more recent drought from 2007-2009, the response by Cal Water
customers in reducing water use will likely occur faster than in past droughts due to improved
water conservation plans and better communications on the need to reduce water use.
Table 16 compares demand to supply for a 4 year multiple dry year period. For the first three
years, the conservative assumption is used that demand remains unchanged from a normal
hydrologic year and that in the fourth year, demand decreases by 10% as does the delivery of
SCWVD Contract water. In all cases, the supply is projected to meet 100% of demand. It is
noted that even if demand did not decrease by 10% in year 4 and SCVWD supply did, the
increased groundwater supplied in 2040 would be 1,674 AF for a total of 5,138 AF, which can be
pumped by the LAS district by increasing well operation times.
Table 16: Multiple Dry Year Period (4 Years): LAS District + Apple Campus 2 Demand and
Supply Comparison - AF
2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
Total Demand:
Years 1 - 3 14,065 13,078 14,055 15,031 16,008 16,984
SCVWD Supply 10,200 9,700 10,299 11,200 12,120 13,000
LAS Groundwater 3,865 3,378 3,855 3,831 3,888 3,984
Total Supply 14,065 13,078 14,055 15,031 16,008 16,984
Difference 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Demand:
Year 4 12,658 11,770 12,650 13,528 14,407 15,286
SCVWD Supply 9,180 8,730 9,180 10,080 10,908 11,700
LAS
Groundwater 3,478 3,040 3,470 3,448 3,499 3,586
Difference 0 0 0 0 0 0
CLIMATE CHANGE
Cal Water prepared a Climate Assessment Report in 2013 that evaluates potential effects of
climate change on the water supplies of its 24 service areas in California. The report identifies
adaptation measures that Cal Water may take to address potential decreases in supply quantities
or negative changes in source water quality. DWR’s Guidebook to Assist Water Suppliers to
30
Prepare a 2010 Urban Water Management Plan, lists topics examined in Cal Water’s Climate
Assessment Report.
Adaptation measures are essentially designed to ensure that projected future supplies are reliable
despite adverse changes in existing supply quantity and quality due to climate change. For
example, snow in the Sierra Nevada provides 65 percent of California’s water supply. Some
predictions are that by 2050 the annual Sierra Nevada snow pack will be significantly reduced.
Much of the lost snow will be in the form of rain, which will run off during winter and early
spring and not be available to be stored as supplies for use during summer. Change in water
runoff may significantly reduce groundwater recharge in the Central Valley increasing demands
on surface water.
DWR continues to work on identifying potential climate change effects on water supplies, water
demand, sea level, and occurrence and severity of weather events. Some potential changes are
summarized below:
Water demand: more hot days and nights and a longer irrigation season will increase
agricultural and urban irrigation needs; power plants and industrial processes will have
increased cooling water needs.
Water supply and quality: increased potential for algal bloom and surface and groundwater
chemistry changes; increased potential for seawater intrusion into surface and groundwaters
due to elevated seawater levels and more powerful storm surges.
Extreme weather events are expected to become more frequent as climate variability
increases, resulting in a higher frequency of more extreme droughts and floods.
LAS DISTRICT SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
Based on:
Adequacy of existing and planned supplies from SCVWD and LAS District groundwater,
Plans to maintain existing wells and construct new ones to increase well production capacity,
Plans to continue to purchase of SCVWD Non-Contract water whenever it is made available
and thereby increase basin groundwater storage for use during drought periods,
In-place, ongoing and planned expanded water conservation programs and best management
practices for reducing demand during normal hydrologic years, single dry year and multiple
dry years in compliance with SBx7-7, CPUC and MOU requirements,
Cal Water’s historic proven success in obtaining increased reductions in water use during
multiple dry years by implementing its demand reduction program, and
Over 80 years of experience in continuously providing an adequate supply to meet demands
during normal, single and multiple dry years in the LAS District,
it can be reasonably concluded for the next 25 years operation (2015 – 2040), under the most
conservative assumptions regarding potable water use, the LAS District will have adequate water
supplies to meet projected demands associated with the proposed Cupertino GP Amendment
Alternative C, Apple Campus 2 project and those of all existing customers and other anticipated
future customers for normal hydrologic, single dry year and multiple dry year conditions.
31
San Jose Water Company Water Supply Evaluation
San Jose Water Company (SJWC), an investor owned water utility, currently serves nearly one
million residents of Santa Clara County.
Service Area Population
SJWC’s service area spans 139 square miles, including most of the Cities of San Jose and
Cupertino, the entire cities of Campbell, Monte Sereno, Saratoga, the Town of Los Gatos, and
parts of unincorporated Santa Clara County.
The population of SJWC’s service area is shown Table 1. These projections are based on the
Association of Bay Area Governments’ population projections and are included in SJWC’s 2010
Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP).
Table 1: Current and Projected SJWC Service Area Population
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
946,494 1,017,684 1,084,352 1,154,824 1,224,564 1,293,771
The WSE estimates the 2040 population by taking the average projected growth rate for the 25
year period from 2010 to 2035 and adding it to the 2035 projection. On this basis, the estimated
SJWC 2040 service area population is 1,363,226.
SJWC Water Demand
Most of SJWC’s customers are either residential or commercial. SJWC also provides water to
industrial, municipal, private fire services, and for public use (fire protection). Table 2 lists
current and projected service connection counts by customer type based on 40 year historical
trends and a 0.5% annual service connection growth rate.
Table 2: SJWC Water Use Connections
Customer Type 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Single Family 170,042 174,335 178,738 183,251 187,878 192,622
Multi Family 30,007 30,765 31,542 32,338 33,155 33,992
Business 20,605 21,125 21,659 22,206 22,766 23,341
Industrial 75 77 79 81 83 85
Public Authority 1,447 1,484 1,521 1,559 1,599 1,639
Resale 36 37 38 39 40 41
Other 162 166 170 175 179 184
Total 222,374 227,989 233,746 239,649 245,700 251,904
Annual water demand projections are estimated to increase 0.4% from 2009 usage data since
2010 was an abnormally low-usage year which is based on historical usage increases.
32
Table 3: SJWC Water Demand by Customer Type (AF)
Customer Type 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Single Family 62,532 67,327 68,685 70,070 71,482 72,923
Multi Family 11,035 11,881 12,121 12,365 12,615 12,869
Business 41,854 45,064 45,973 46,899 47,845 48,810
Industrial 496 534 545 556 567 578
Public Authority 6,173 6,646 6,780 6,917 7,056 7,198
Resale 581 625 638 651 664 677
Other 163 175 179 183 186 190
Total 122,834 132,254 134,920 137,640 140,415 143,246
SJWC’s total demand is the sum of projected metered demand plus 7% percent of that amount
for non-revenue water, which includes authorized unmetered uses for firefighting, main flushing
and public use and unauthorized use which is due to meter reading discrepancies, reservoir
cleaning, malfunctioning valves, leakage and theft. Table 4 is the SJWC 2010 UWMP total
projected demand to 2035.
Table 4: SJWC Total Demand (AF)
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Customer Metered Demand 122,834 132,254 134,920 137,640 140,415 143,246
Non-Revenue Water 9,024 9,649 9,844 10,042 10,245 10,451
Total System Demand 131,858 141,903 144,764 147,682 150,660 153,697
Projected 2040 demand is estimated to be an increase of 3,037 AFY over 2035 demand for a
total of 156,734 AFY. (This is the same increase projected for the 5 year interval between 2030
and 2035.)
The projected increase in total demand between 2015 and 2040 is 14,831 AFY.
SJWC Demand Management
SJWC provides a full range of water conservation services to residential and commercial
customers. A key element of SJWC’s conservation programs is the water audit program. The
audit program provides customers an opportunity to learn about ways to reduce water
consumption and to identify and fix any leaks they may have. Audits are performed at a
customer request, typically in response to a high water bill concern and/or in response to
marketing efforts. Audits are performed for both residential and commercial customers.
SJWC offers rebates for high efficiency toilets and washing machines. SJWC takes advantage of
all regional rebate programs - all of SCVWD’s rebate programs are offered to SJWC customers.
Typically customers are recommended to specific rebate programs during the course of a water
audit based on a customer’s need. Customers can also access rebates directly from retail outlets
33
when purchasing equipment such as high efficiency washing machines. SJWC collaborates with
SCVWD on public outreach and education including such items as customer bill inserts and
conservation campaign advertising.
SJWC has also increased the outreach and educational programs on outdoor water use. SJWC
constructed a water-smart demonstration garden that is open to the public. SJWC has developed
a dedicated water wise landscaping website where customers can access a plant information
database that includes hundreds of low water use plants as well as a photographic database of
water wise gardens in the San Jose-Santa Clara County area. The landscaping website and the
demonstration garden tour can be accessed from the SJWC home web page.
In addition to these programs, SJWC engages in other activities that contribute to the overall goal
of reducing water waste, but are not specifically designated as conservation or water
management programs. These include SJWC’s meter calibration and replacement program,
corrosion control program, valve exercising program and metering all service connections.
Proposed Cupertino General Plan Amendment SJWC Area Demand Projections
Details of the proposed land use changes for the general plan amendment are provided in the Project
EIR.
Estimated water demands for the proposed GP amendment developments in SJWC’s service area
are based on the data in Table 2 in the introductory section of this document and the following
unit demand factors for the four categories of land use. It is noted that these demand factors are
based on “traditional” water use rates and do not assume implementation water conservation
measures. The resulting demand projections for the three classes of development defined in the
GP amendment can be viewed as conservative. The City will require developers to incorporate
water conserving fixtures and landscaping into their specific development plans, which should
result in lower water usage than projected here.
Alternative C
Residential Dwelling Units:
The combined proposed residential dwelling units in the SJWC and Cupertino service areas for
Alternative C are 937. Since residential water use in Cupertino is probably similar irrespective of
the service provider, the Cal Water internal use data is used here.
For the Cupertino proposed GP Amendment: 937 dwelling units x 137.2 gpd/dwelling unit =
128,560 gallons/day or 144 AFY.
Office Space:
Using the same assumptions as for the Cal Water service area - one person per 300 sq ft of floor
space and 90 gallons/day/person results in estimated water use for office space of:
255,231sq ft/ 300 sq ft/employee x 90 gallons/day/employee = 75,570 gallons/day or 86 AFY.
Commercial (retail goods stores, services, restaurants, coffee shops, groceries):
34
Using the same assumptions of water use rates as for the Cal Water service area:
Dry goods and services: 0.11 gallons/day/sq ft
Restaurants: 1.10 gallons/day/sq ft
Groceries and supermarkets: 0.65 gallons/day/sq ft
Sports or athletic club: 0.85 gallons/day/sq ft
No specific breakdown of commercial uses is available at this time, therefore, the following mix
is assumed for the GP amendment:
Dry goods and services: 70% x 370,945 sq ft x 0.11 g/d/sq ft = 28,560 gallons/day
Restaurants: 15% x 370,945 sq ft x 1.10 g/d/sq ft = 61,206 gallons/day
Groceries and supermarkets: 10% x 370,945 sq ft x 0.65 g/d/sq ft = 24,110gallons/day
Athletic Club: 5% x 370,945 sq ft x 0.85 g/d/sq ft = 15,765 gallons/day
Total Commercial water demand: 129,641 gallons/day or 145 AFY.
Landscape Irrigation:
It is assumed that there will be landscaped areas for all proposed development and that the areas
to be irrigated are 15% of the total areas proposed in the GP amendment.
A very general estimate of that area is:
0.15 ((937 dwelling units x 1,200 sq ft/dwelling unit) + 370,945 sq ft + 255,231 sq ft)
= 0.15 (1,124,400 + 370,945+ 255,231)
= 262,586 sq ft/43,560 sq ft/acre = 6.0 acres
It is assumed that each dwelling unit will have an average lot size of 1,200 sq ft.
Using an annual average irrigation rate of 3,615 gallons/ day/acre, results in an estimated
landscape irrigation water use of: 6.0 acres x 3,615 gallons/day/acre = 21,690 gallons/day or 24
AFY
Total:
Total estimated San Jose Water build out 2040 GP amendment water demand = 144 + 86 + 145
+ 24 = 399 AFY.
The historic water use factors used to make the above proposed GP Amendment water demand
forecast do not take into account requirements for water conservation measures to be
incorporated into new development. Therefore, it is highly probable that new development
conservation measures implementation will reduce water demand. Accordingly, it is assumed
that future GP Amendment demand will be reduced by 15%. So total proposed GP amendment
water demand at build out for Alternative C for the SJWC and leased City of Cupertino service
areas is estimated to be:
0.85 x 399 = 339 AFY
The total projected increase in SJWC demand between 2015 and 2040 (25 years) is 14,831AFY.
The proposed Alternative C Cupertino GP amendment demand represents 2.2% of this.
35
Since the SJWC 2010 UWMP plan projected increased demand is based on general growth in its
service area, it is reasonable to assume that the proposed Alternative C Cupertino GP amendment
demand is included in the overall demand forecast as it constitutes a small percentage.
Alternative A
Following is a demand estimate at build out for the proposed GP Plan Amendment Alternative
A. It was developed by calculating the reduced percentage of development for each use
classification and applying it to the demand estimated for Alternative C.
Residential: 0.66 x 144 AFY = 95 AFY
Office: 0.37 x 86 AFY = 32 AFY
Commercial: 0.192 x 145 AFY = 28 AFY
Landscape: 0.41 x 24 AFY = 10 AFY
Total Estimated Demand: 165 AFY
Applying a 15% reduction factor due to water conservation measures to be incorporated into new
development, the total LAS GP amendment water demand at build out for Alternative A is
estimated to be: 0.85 x 165 = 140 AFY or 41.3 % of Alternative C.
Alternative B
Following is a demand estimate at build out for the proposed GP Plan Amendment Alternative B.
It was developed by calculating the reduced percentage of development for each use
classification and applying it to the demand estimated for Alternative C.
Residential: 0.893 x 144 AFY = 129 AFY
Office: 0.72 x 86 AFY = 62 AFY
Commercial: 1.00 x 145 AFY = 145 AFY
Landscape: 0.87 x 24 AFY = 21 AFY
Total Estimated Demand: 357 AFY
Applying a 15% reduction factor due to water conservation measures to be incorporated into new
development, the total LAS GP amendment water demand at build out for Alternative A is
estimated to be: 0.85 x 357 = 303 AFY or 89.5 % of Alternative C.
Since Alternative C represents the greatest increase in demand, it is used in evaluating the
adequacy of water supply. If future supply is adequate for Alternative C then it will also be for
Alternatives A and B.
SJWC Water Supply
SJWC has “pre-1914 surface water rights” to raw water in Los Gatos Creek and local watersheds
in the Santa Cruz Mountains. Prior to 1872, appropriative water rights could be acquired by
simply taking and beneficially using water. In 1914, the Water Code was adopted and it
grandfathered in all existing water entitlements to license holders. SJWC filed for a license in
1947 and was granted license number 10933 (Appendix A) in 1976 by the State Water Resources
Control Board to draw 6,240 AF/yr from Los Gatos Creek. SJWC has upgraded the collection
and treatment system that draws water from this watershed which has increased the capacity of
this entitlement to approximately 11,200 AF/yr for an average rain year.
36
In 1981, SJWC entered into a 70-year master contract with SCVWD for the purchase of treated
water. The contract provides for rolling three-year purchase schedules establishing fixed
quantities of water to be purchased during each period. The maximum peak day rate for delivery
of water from SCVWD under the 2013/2014 fiscal-year schedule is 108 MGD. The water is
treated at one of three District-operated treatment plants (Rinconada, Penitencia and Santa
Teresa). SJWC and SCVWD currently have a three year treated water contract (Appendix B)
that covers 2011 – 2014, with contract supply ranging from 66,994 AF/yr in 2011 to 67,608
AF/yr in 2014. SJWC asks for and receives underground water rights in conjunction with new
developments. SJWC has the right to withdraw groundwater from aquifers below said property
when in compliance with SCVWD’s permitting requirements. In Santa Clara County, this right
is subject to a groundwater extraction fee levied by SCVWD based on the amount of
groundwater pumped into SJWC’s distribution system. SJWC generally uses the most
economical source of water, which is largely determined by SCVWD’s groundwater extraction
fee rates and contracted water rates.
SJWC has three sources of supply: groundwater,
imported purchased treated surface water and
local surface water. A map of where each
source is the predominant source is shown to the
right.
On average, groundwater from the major water-
bearing aquifers of the Santa Clara Valley sub-
basin comprise one third of SJWC’s water
supply. These aquifers are recharged naturally
by rainfall and streams and artificially by
recharge ponds operated by SCVWD.
SJWC has a contract with SCVWD to purchase
slightly over fifty percent of its water supply.
This water originates from several sources
including local reservoirs, the State Water
Project and the federally funded Central Valley Project San Felipe Division. Water is piped into
SJWC’s system at various turnouts after it is treated at one of the three SCVWD water treatment
plants (Rinconada to the west side pipeline and Penitencia and Santa Teresa to the east side
pipeline).
SJWC’s final source of supply is from surface water in the local watersheds of the Santa Cruz
Mountains. It provides about ten percent of the water supply depending on the amount of annual
rainfall. A series of dams and automated intakes collect the water released from SJWC’s lakes.
The water is pumped into to SJWC’s Montevina water treatment plant for treatment prior to
entering the distribution system. SJWC’s Saratoga Treatment Plant draws water from a local
stream which collects water from the nearby Santa Cruz Mountains. The following pie chart
shows SJWC’s 2011 supply source breakdown.
37
SJWC Sources of Water for 2011
Table 6 shows the actual amount of water supplied to SJWC’s system from each source in 2010
and projections until 2035. Projected surface water is based on a long term average at SJWC.
Groundwater and SCVWD Treated Water projections include SJWC’s plan to acquire additional
water needed for development projects by installing production wells within the distribution
system, by purchasing additional treated water from SCVWD and recycled water from the South
Bay Water Recycling Program. The overall long-term strategy for groundwater as discussed in
the 2003 SCVWD Integrated Water Resource Planning Study (IWRP) is to maximize the amount
of water available in the groundwater basins to protect against drought and emergencies.
SCVWD attempts to maximize use of treated local and imported water when available.
Table 6: Current and Projected SJWC Water Supply – Including Conservation (AF)
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
SCVWD Treated Water 64,783 72,636 74,344 76,086 77,864 79,677
SJWC Groundwater 51,107 57,187 58,340 59,516 60,716 61,940
SJWC Surface Water 15,968 12,080 12,080 12,080 12,080 12,080
Total Demand 131,858 141,903 144,764 147,682 150,660 153,697
Recycled Water 1,208 2,556 4,980 5,234 5,501 5,782
Additional Conservation 4,886 5,106 5,300 5,438 5,579 5,579
Total with Conservation 137,952 149,565 155,044 158,354 161,740 165,058
Conservation is treated by SJWC as an additional source of water that offsets potable water
demand. SJWC projects an increase in conservation through 2035 to over 5,500 AFY due to
implementation of a more intensified conservation program. Conservation savings are
anticipated resulting from increased use of ultra-low flush toilets, high efficiency toilets, low
flow showerheads, water efficient appliances, individual conservation, and reduction in
landscape irrigation requirements.
38
SJWC draws water from the Santa Clara Valley subbasin (basin) in the north part of Santa Clara
County. The basin extends from near Coyote Narrows at Metcalf Road to the County’s northern
boundary. It is bounded on the west by the Santa Cruz Mountains and on the east by the Diablo
Range; these two ranges converge at the Coyote Narrows to form the southern limit of the basin.
The basin is 22 miles long and 15 miles wide, with a surface area of 225 square miles.
According to SCVWD, 115,358 acre-feet of groundwater was extracted from the basin in 2001.
SCVWD estimates that 26,000 acre-feet were naturally recharged to the basin and 90,700 acre-
feet were artificially recharged to the basin, mainly through recharge ponds. The following chart
shows the water balance of the basin in 2001.
Santa Clara Valley Groundwater Basin Water Balance (2001)
020,00040,00060,00080,000100,000120,000
Acre-feet of Water
Extracted Water
Recharged Water
A rtificial
Recharge
Natural
Recharge
SJWC
Extraction
Rest of Santa
Clara County
Extraction
The groundwater elevation in the basin has been steadily on the rise for the past 40 years under
the management of the SCVWD. The following chart shows groundwater elevation since 1915
using the well surface elevation as the datum. SCVWD has set up a successful artificial recharge
system employing local reservoirs, percolation ponds, and an injection well to supplement the
natural recharge of the basin to prevent overdraft. The groundwater basin level is currently high
at most SJWC well fields and historically better prepared for the effects of a multi-year drought.
High groundwater levels are a result of: less pumping, an increased use of imported water, and
recharge of water into the aquifer by SCVWD. Total groundwater storage at the end of 2013 is
projected to be 326,000 AF, which is within the normal range and prepared for the effects of a
multi-year drought. SJWC’s 2010 UWMP states that the operational storage capacity of the
Basin is estimated to be 350,000 AF. The shallow groundwater level varies anually with the
peak usually occuring around May, a few months after the typical peak monthly rainfall in
January.
39
Groundwater Elevation in SJWC’s Reference Wells
‐250
‐200
‐150
‐100
‐50
0
19101920193019401950196019701980199020002010
Gr
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
(f
e
e
t
)
SCVWD will continue to work with SJWC and other local water retailers to refine future
projections of both treated water and groundwater use to ensure planning efforts are consistent.
Groundwater from the Basin is a substantial source of water for SJWC’s entire service area. In
the past five years, groundwater has been the source for approximately one third of SJWC’s total
supply. Table 7 shows the groundwater SJWC pumped from the basin for 2006 – 2010.
Table 7: Groundwater Pumped by SJWC (AF)
Basin Name Metered 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Santa Clara Valley
Subbasin
Volumetric
meter data 43,682 65,760 68,780 60,507 51,107
Groundwater as a percent of total
water supply 30.1% 43.4% 45.6% 43.5% 38.8%
Based on SJWC’s projections, groundwater will continue to be a major source of supply,
comprising about 40 percent on average of the total water supply. Table 8 shows groundwater
pumping projections and groundwater as a percentage of total supply until 2035.
40
Table 8: SJWC Groundwater Projected Use (AF)
Basin name 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Santa Clara Valley Subbasin 57,187 58,340 59,516 60,716 61,940
Percent of Total Water Supply 40.3%40.3%40.3%40.3%40.3%
City of Cupertino Water Supply
The City of Cupertino as discussed previously has leased the operation and maintenance of its
water system to SJWC. Based on information from SJWC, approximately 98% of water supply
for the City’s water system is purchased from SCVWD. SJWC periodically operates two city
wells with a nominal pumping rate of 500 gpm each for a combined production of 1,000 gpm.
For the 17 years that SJWC has been operating the city system, increases in demand have been
met by increased purchases from SCVWD and are factored into the demand projections made by
SJWC in Table 4. Therefore, the supply analysis provided for SJWC also applies to the City of
Cupertino system.
Supply Adequacy and Reliability Assessment
SJWC has multiple sources of water which provide a high degree of supply reliability. For
added reliability, SJWC incorporates diesel fueled generators which will operate wells and
pumps in the event of power outages. Since SCVWD supplies nearly 90% of SJWC’s annual
water supply, SJWC depends on SCVWD’s supply reliability measures.
SJWC has an established well replacement program. The program identifies and replaces two
wells per year based on numerous criteria, including a well’s production and observed water
quality problems. The replacement of older wells and optimization of existing wells will allow
SJWC to maintain its groundwater supply reliability. SCVWD’s policy is to achieve 95%
reliability of supply during significant water shortages that occur during multiyear droughts. To
accomplish this, SJWC can use less groundwater in certain areas or zones to achieve the overall
balance which best meets SCVWD’s and SJWC’s operational goals.
SJWC applied the base years SCVWD used for the average water year, single-dry water year and
multiple-dry water years in the 2010 UWMP. Water years used by SJWC are listed in Table 9.
Table 9: SJWC Basis of Water Year Data
Water Year Type Base Year(s)
Average Water Year 2002
Single-Dry Water Year 1977
Multiple-Dry Water Years 1987-1991
Table 10 shows the quantity of water SJWC received from each source of water during the
average water year, single-dry water year and multiple-dry water years.
41
Table 10: SJWC Supply Reliability – Historic Conditions (AF)
Water Source
Average
Water
Year
(2002)
Single Dry
Water Year
(1977)
Multiple Dry Water Years
Year 1
(1987)
Year 2
(1988)
Year 3
(1989)
Year 4
(1990)
Year 5
(1991)
District
Treated 90,815 36,220 57,879 65,935 81,405 64,143 63,093
Local Surface 8,167 1,364 4,576 3,548 6,500 3,719 6,435
Groundwater 56,475 72,962 92,257 81,964 37,020 55,363 42,513
Total 155,457 110,545 154,712 151,447 124,925 123,225 112,042
Percent of Average Year: 71.1%99.5%97.4%80.4%79.3% 72.1%
Besides a drought, other factors which could cause SJWC’s sources of supply to become
inconsistent are summarized below.
Table 12: SJWC Factors Resulting in Supply Inconsistency
Supply Legal Environmental Water Quality Climatic Mechanical
Local Surface x x x x
Ground Water x x x x
SCVWD Treated
Water x x x x x
Legal
SCVWD is responsible for managing water resources in Santa Clara County, including the long-
range planning for additional supplies and/or conservation needed to meet future water demands.
SJWC and other retailers work closely with SCVWD to coordinate the purchase of treated
imported water and the extraction of groundwater from retailer-owned wells. This activity is
important to the operation of the countywide water supply and distribution system and the
retailers are dependent on SCVWD’s long-range resource planning.
In determining the long-range availability of water, considerations must also be given to
decisions at the state or federal level that are out of the SCVWD’s control. The District has
contracts for water deliveries with both the State Water Project (SWP) and the Federal Central
Valley Project (CVP). Due to flow restrictions for the protection of water quality and the habitat
of fish and wildlife in the Delta, water deliveries may be reduced from previous levels. During
critical dry periods the SCVWD can expect additional reductions in water deliveries. Long-
range planning success depends on the SCVWD’s ability to obtain adequate imported water
supplies and on proper management of the local groundwater basin.
Environmental and Climatic
SCVWD contracts with the State of California to receive raw water from the California Central
Valley through the State Water Project (SWP). Water supplied through this aqueduct (which
originates from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta) may be limited because of subsidence
problems which are beginning to occur in that area and due to pumping restrictions associated
with the protection of endangered species. SCVWD has also contracted with the Federal Central
Valley Project (CVP) to supply raw water from the San Joaquin Valley via the Santa Clara
42
Conduit. The reliance of water from inland sources through the SWP or the CVP is very critical;
the loss of any or all of these sources due to pipe failure, levee failure, earthquake, or human
intervention can have an extreme effect on SJWC’s water supply. Given the above factors which
could result in an inconsistent water supply, it is crucial that SJWC have sufficient backup wells
and pumping capacity to supply customers for as long as several months solely from
groundwater sources. SJWC believes it has this capacity in an emergency if mandatory
conservation is enacted and due to the relatively full groundwater basin.
Water Quality
The quality of groundwater in the basins, surface water from the Santa Cruz Mountains, or the
raw water supply to SCVWD’s treatment plants could decrease or be contaminated such that
existing treatment facilities are not adequate to meet current drinking water standards.
Contamination could cause a source of supply to become unusable until further treatment
techniques are utilized, or the contamination is no longer a threat to the source of supply.
Mechanical Failures
All sources of water require mechanical equipment to bring water to the public. Mechanical
failures may cause water service shutdowns until repairs are made. To reduce the occurrence of
failures, SJWC routinely inspects above-grade facilities at all stations. In addition, SJWC has
created and implemented infrastructure replacement programs for all wells and pipelines. To
reduce the impact of mechanical failures, SJWC’s maintenance department is staffed 24-hours,
seven-days a week to respond to and repair any water related emergency.
SJWC’s projected supply and demand is shown in Table 13.
Table 13: SJWC Supply and Demand Comparison – Normal Year (AF)
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035
Supply 131,858 141,903 144,764 147,682 150,660 153,697
Demand
(Including GP Amendment ) 131,858 141,903 144,764 147,682 150,660 153,697
Difference 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tables 14 and 15 are comparisons between the 2010 and 2035 projected supply and demand
during normal, single-dry and multiple-dry year droughts. These numbers were generated by
multiplying the current and 2035 demands by the percentages of normal water supply SJWC
experienced during the 1977 single year and the 1987-1992 multi-year droughts. If during a
drought, SJWC should experience a shortage of supply, it will activate its current Water Shortage
Contingency Plan. Although there appears to be shortages during droughts, in reality voluntary
and involuntary water conservation greatly reduces demand. SJWC foresees meeting all future
demands.
43
Table 14: SJWC 2010 Supply and Demand for Normal, Single-Dry and Multiple-Dry Years
(AF)
2010 Supply
& Demand
Normal
Water Year
Single-Dry
Water Year
Multiple-Dry Water Years
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Supply Total 131,858 93,751 131,199 128,430 106,014 104,563 95,070
Demand Total 131,858 93,751 131,199 128,430 106,014 104,563 95,070
Difference 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 15: SJWC 2035 Supply and Demand for Normal, Single-Dry and Multiple-Dry Years
(AF)
2035 Supply
& Demand
Normal
Water Year
Single-Dry
Water Year
Multiple-Dry Water Years
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Supply Total 153,697 109,279 152,929 149,701 123,572 121,882 110,816
Demand Total 153,697 109,279 152,929 149,701 123,572 121,882 110,816
Difference 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SJWC Summary and Conclusion
(1) Total water projected 2040 demand for the proposed Cupertino GP amendment for
Alternative C is 339 AFY. This represents 2.2% of the projected increase in water
demand from 2015 to 2035 and is considered part of anticipated and planned for
growth in the SJWC service area.
(2) SJWC currently owns rights to receive water from the following sources:
1. Groundwater - from the Santa Clara Valley Subbasin
2. Imported surface water - from the Santa Clara Valley Water District
3. Local surface water - from Los Gatos Creek and Local Watersheds
(3) There is sufficient water available to supply the demand s projected for the proposed
Cupertino GP amendment, all existing demand and other projected increases in water
demand for the next 26 years for normal, one dry year and multiple dry year periods.
........................................................................................................................
APPENDIX I:
PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN POLICY AMENDMENTS
........................................................................................................................
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
U
p
d
a
t
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
Pu
b
l
i
c
D
r
a
f
t
|
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
Prepared by: Contents
In
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
20
4
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
V
i
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
G
u
i
d
i
n
g
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
334
La
n
d
U
s
e
a
n
d
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
768
Ci
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
857076
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
967985
He
a
l
t
h
a
n
d
S
a
f
e
ty
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1119299
Pu
b
l
i
c
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
124103110
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
In
t
r
o
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
In
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
4
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
p
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
a
Concept
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
R
e
p
o
r
t
as
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
Th
e
r
e
p
o
r
t
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
e
d
t
h
r
e
e
d
r
a
f
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
w
h
i
c
h
o
u
t
l
i
n
e
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
f
u
t
u
r
e
s
c
e
n
a
r
i
o
s
f
o
r
h
o
w
a
n
d
w
h
e
r
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
c
a
n
o
c
c
u
r
i
n
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
T
h
e
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
w
e
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
t
o
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
t
o
l
o
c
a
l
a
n
d
re
g
i
o
n
a
l
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
g
r
o
w
t
h
f
a
c
t
o
r
s
a
n
d
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
n
e
e
d
s
,
w
h
i
l
e
a
l
s
o
ad
d
r
e
s
s
i
n
g
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
d
e
s
i
r
e
s
a
b
o
u
t
t
h
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
o
f
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
f
u
t
u
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
T
h
e
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
c
a
p
t
u
r
e
in
p
u
t
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
f
r
o
m
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
o
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
a
n
d
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
a
b
r
o
a
d
sp
e
c
t
r
u
m
o
f
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
o
p
i
n
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
p
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
.
I
n
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
,
t
h
e
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
m
o
v
e
f
r
o
m
l
e
s
s
i
n
t
e
n
s
e
t
o
m
o
r
e
i
n
t
e
n
s
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
th
e
p
r
o
g
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
t
o
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
(
t
h
e
Concept
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
ca
n
b
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
a
t
:
ww
w
.
c
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
g
p
a
.
o
r
g
).
On
M
a
r
c
h
4
,
2
0
1
4
,
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
d
i
r
e
c
t
e
d
s
t
a
f
f
t
o
s
t
u
d
y
e
a
c
h
o
f
th
e
t
h
r
e
e
d
r
a
f
t
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
I
m
p
a
c
t
Re
p
o
r
t
(
E
I
R
)
b
e
i
n
g
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
.
B
e
c
a
u
s
e
t
h
e
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
r
a
n
g
e
i
n
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
,
t
h
e
E
I
R
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
w
i
l
l
a
l
l
o
w
de
c
i
s
i
o
n
m
a
k
e
r
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
t
o
f
u
l
l
y
u
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
t
h
e
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
f
e
a
c
h
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
(
e
.
g
.
,
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
,
a
i
r
qu
a
l
i
t
y
,
b
i
o
l
o
g
y
,
n
o
i
s
e
,
e
t
c
.
)
.
On
A
p
r
i
l
1
,
2
0
1
4
,
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
m
e
t
i
n
a
j
o
i
n
t
s
t
u
d
y
s
e
s
s
i
o
n
t
o
r
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
o
l
i
c
y
t
o
p
i
c
s
th
a
t
n
e
e
d
t
o
b
e
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
a
m
e
n
d
e
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
.
W
h
i
l
e
t
h
e
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
d
i
a
g
r
a
m
s
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
c
h
o
i
c
e
s
,
t
h
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
o
l
i
c
y
t
o
p
i
c
s
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
t
h
a
t
ar
e
n
o
t
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
i
l
y
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
t
o
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
.
Th
e
s
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
:
Ma
j
o
r
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
:
N
e
w
i
d
e
a
s
a
n
d
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
t
h
a
t
h
a
v
e
em
e
r
g
e
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
2
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
Re
c
e
n
t
S
t
a
t
e
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
S
t
a
t
e
l
a
w
s
a
n
d
c
o
n
t
e
n
t
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
h
a
t
n
e
e
d
t
o
b
e
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
a
m
e
n
d
e
d
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
.
Cl
e
a
n
-
u
p
I
t
e
m
s
:
M
i
n
o
r
e
d
i
t
s
a
n
d
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
t
o
ma
k
e
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
i
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
l
y
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
o
r
m
o
r
e
re
a
d
a
b
l
e
.
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
:
N
e
w
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
o
r
st
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
D
r
a
f
t
E
I
R
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
t
o
mi
t
i
g
a
t
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
Pu
r
p
o
s
e
o
f
t
h
i
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
Th
i
s
s
u
m
m
a
r
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
i
n
t
r
a
c
k
-
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
r
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
u
p
d
a
t
e
s
t
o
th
e
2
0
0
5
C
i
t
y
o
f
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
t
o
e
i
t
h
e
r
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
po
l
i
c
y
t
o
p
i
c
s
a
n
d
/
o
r
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
i
t
h
e
r
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
,
B
o
r
C.
T
h
i
s
s
u
m
m
a
r
y
w
i
l
l
b
e
u
s
e
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
p
u
b
l
i
c
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
s
as
a
w
a
y
t
o
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
p
o
l
i
c
y
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
f
o
r
e
a
c
h
o
f
t
h
e
t
h
r
e
e
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
(
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
f
o
r
f
a
l
l
2
0
1
4
)
.
U
l
t
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
,
i
t
i
s
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
w
i
l
l
m
a
k
e
a
f
o
r
m
a
l
d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
t
o
am
e
n
d
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
r
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
t
o
e
i
t
h
e
r
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
,
B
or
C
(
o
r
s
o
m
e
c
o
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
t
h
r
e
e
)
.
In
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
,
g
u
i
d
i
n
g
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
,
g
o
a
l
,
p
o
l
i
c
y
a
n
d
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
ch
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
i
s
s
u
m
m
a
r
y
,
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
i
s
a
l
s
o
c
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
pr
e
p
a
r
i
n
g
a
n
u
p
d
a
t
e
d
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
a
n
e
w
C
l
i
m
a
t
e
A
c
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
.
F
o
r
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
t
h
o
s
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
,
p
l
e
a
s
e
v
i
s
i
t
:
ww
w
.
c
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
g
p
a
.
o
r
g
.
Fo
r
m
a
t
o
f
t
h
e
T
a
b
l
e
s
Ea
c
h
t
a
b
l
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
2
0
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
t
e
x
t
f
o
l
l
o
w
e
d
b
y
tr
a
c
k
-
c
h
a
n
g
e
e
d
i
t
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
.
So
m
e
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
r
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
t
o
e
a
c
h
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
(e
.
g
.
,
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
i
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
as
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
s
)
.
O
t
h
e
r
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
w
i
l
l
n
e
e
d
t
o
b
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
d
r
e
g
a
r
d
l
e
s
s
o
f
wh
i
c
h
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
i
s
s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
(
e
.
g
.
,
p
o
l
i
c
y
up
d
a
t
e
s
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
i
s
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
S
t
a
t
e
l
a
w
)
.
Ea
c
h
t
a
b
l
e
a
l
s
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
c
o
l
u
m
n
l
a
b
e
l
e
d
“
R
e
a
s
o
n
f
o
r
C
h
a
n
g
e
(
s
)
,
”
wh
i
c
h
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
o
n
e
o
r
m
o
r
e
o
f
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
:
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
I
n
p
u
t
:
C
h
a
n
g
e
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
s
i
n
p
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
du
r
i
n
g
a
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
w
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
o
r
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
,
o
r
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
a
s
u
r
v
e
y
,
on
l
i
n
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
,
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
c
a
r
d
o
r
f
o
r
m
a
l
p
u
b
l
i
c
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
.
PC
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
:
C
h
a
n
g
e
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
s
a
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
.
CC
D
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
:
C
h
a
n
g
e
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
s
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Le
g
a
l
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
:
C
h
a
n
g
e
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
e
s
r
e
c
e
n
t
S
t
a
t
e
l
a
w
o
r
co
n
t
e
n
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
.
Co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y
/
E
d
i
t
i
n
g
:
C
h
a
n
g
e
w
a
s
m
a
d
e
b
y
C
i
t
y
s
t
a
f
f
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
in
t
e
r
n
a
l
l
y
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
g
r
a
m
m
a
r
/
c
l
a
r
i
t
y
.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
3
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
4
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
V
i
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
G
u
i
d
i
n
g
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
Th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
t
a
b
l
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
t
h
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
2
0
0
5
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
V
i
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
G
u
i
d
i
n
g
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
2
0
40
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
V
i
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
G
u
i
d
i
n
g
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
.
20
0
5
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
V
i
s
i
o
n
20
4
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
V
i
s
i
o
n
Reason for Change(s)
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
a
s
p
i
r
e
s
t
o
b
e
a
b
a
l
a
nc
e
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
w
i
t
h
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
hi
l
l
s
i
d
e
s
a
n
d
c
r
e
e
k
s
,
q
u
i
e
t
,
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
,
ex
e
m
p
l
a
r
y
p
a
r
k
s
a
n
d
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
a
n
d
a
v
i
b
r
a
n
t
,
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
“
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
.
”
T
h
e
C
i
t
y
w
i
l
l
b
e
s
a
f
e
,
f
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
,
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
,
w
a
l
k
-
a
b
l
e
a
n
d
in
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
f
o
r
a
l
l
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
,
w
i
t
h
am
p
l
e
p
l
a
c
e
s
a
n
d
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
pe
o
p
l
e
t
o
i
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
a
n
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
e
.
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
a
s
p
i
r
e
s
t
o
b
e
a
ba
l
a
n
c
e
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
w
i
t
h
qu
i
e
t
ac
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
hi
l
l
s
i
d
e
s
an
d
cr
e
e
k
s
,
q
u
i
e
t
,
at
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
,; exemplary
pa
r
k
s
a
n
d
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
; ac
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
a
r
e
a
s
, hi
l
l
s
i
d
e
s
a
n
d
c
r
e
e
k
s
;
and a
vi
b
r
a
n
t
,
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
“
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
”
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
T
h
e
C
i
t
y
wi
l
l
b
e
s
a
f
e
,
fr
i
e
n
d
l
y
,
he
a
l
t
h
y
,
co
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
,
w
a
l
k
-ab
l
e
,
b
i
k
e
a
b
l
e
a
n
d
i
n
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
f
o
r
a
l
l
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
w
o
r
k
e
r
s
,
w
i
t
h
a
m
p
l
e
p
l
a
c
e
s
a
n
d
o
pp
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
p
e
o
p
l
e
t
o
in
t
e
r
a
c
t
,
a
n
d
re
c
r
e
a
t
e
,
i
n
n
o
v
a
t
e
a
n
d
c
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
e
.
Community Input Consistency/Editing
20
0
5
G
u
i
d
i
n
g
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
20
4
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
V
i
s
i
o
n
Reason for Change(s)
1.
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
m
u
s
t
b
e
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
“
f
u
l
l
-
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
,
”
w
i
t
h
co
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
t
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
p
a
r
k
s
,
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
,
t
r
a
i
l
s
,
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
p
a
t
h
s
a
n
d
n
e
a
r
b
y
sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
T
h
e
y
s
h
o
u
l
d
ha
v
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
a
b
l
e
e
d
g
e
s
a
n
d
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
an
c
h
o
r
e
d
b
y
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
o
n
p
a
r
k
s
i
t
e
s
o
r
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
.
1.
De
v
e
l
o
p
C
o
h
e
s
i
v
e
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
En
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
a
l
l
n
N
ei
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
ar
e
m
u
s
t
b
e
sa
f
e
,
a
n
d
at
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
in
c
l
u
d
e
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
t
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
a
“f
u
l
l
-
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
,” of
lo
c
a
l
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
w
i
t
h
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
t
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
pa
r
k
s
,
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
,
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
,
t
r
a
i
l
s
,
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
p
a
t
h
s
a
n
d
ne
a
r
b
y
sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
Th
e
y
s
h
o
u
l
d
h
a
v
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
a
b
l
e
e
d
g
e
s
a
n
d
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
a
n
c
h
o
r
e
d
b
y
op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
o
n
p
a
r
k
s
i
t
e
s
o
r
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
.
Community Input Consistency/Editing
2.
H
e
a
l
t
h
a
n
d
S
a
f
e
t
y
Gr
e
a
t
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
a
r
e
h
e
a
l
t
h
y
,
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
s
e
c
u
r
e
f
o
r
a
l
l
p
e
o
p
l
e
a
n
d
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
S
a
f
e
t
y
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
i
n
c
l
ud
e
c
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
o
l
i
c
e
,
f
i
r
e
,
pa
r
a
m
e
d
i
c
a
n
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
;
d
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
,
s
a
f
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
si
t
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
w
i
t
h
e
y
e
s
a
n
d
e
a
r
s
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
,
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
w
a
t
c
h
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
,
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
e
a
r
t
h
q
u
a
k
e
s
a
n
d
l
a
n
d
s
l
i
d
e
s
a
n
d
a
n
a
m
p
l
e
s
u
p
p
l
y
o
f
s
a
f
e
,
we
l
l
-
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
p
a
r
k
s
,
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
,
t
r
a
i
l
s
a
n
d
p
a
t
h
w
a
y
s
.
2.
Im
p
r
o
v
e
P
u
b
l
i
c
He
a
l
t
h
a
n
d
S
a
f
e
t
y
Pr
o
m
o
t
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
h
e
a
l
t
h
b
y
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
i
n
g
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
h
e
a
l
t
h
y
fo
o
d
s
;
e
n
s
u
r
e
an
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
s
a
f
e
,
w
e
l
l
-
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
p
a
r
k
s
,
o
p
e
n
sp
a
c
e
,
t
r
a
i
l
s
a
n
d
p
a
t
h
w
a
y
s
;
a
n
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
b
y
e
n
s
u
r
i
n
g
a
l
l
a
r
e
a
s
o
f
th
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
r
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
f
r
o
m
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
a
n
d
f
u
l
l
y
s
e
r
v
e
d
b
y
Gr
e
a
t
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
a
r
e
h
e
a
l
t
h
y
,
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
s
e
c
u
r
e
f
o
r
a
l
l
p
e
o
p
l
e
a
n
d
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
S
a
f
e
t
y
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
c
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
a
l
po
l
i
c
e
,
f
i
r
e
,
p
a
r
a
m
e
d
i
c
an
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
;
d
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
,
s
a
f
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
s
i
t
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
wi
t
h
e
y
e
s
a
n
d
e
a
r
s
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
t
o
t
he
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
,
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
w
a
t
c
h
pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
,
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
.
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
e
a
r
t
h
q
u
a
k
e
s
a
n
d
la
n
d
s
l
i
d
e
s
a
n
d
a
n
a
m
p
l
e
s
u
p
p
l
y
o
f
s
a
f
e
,
w
e
l
l
-
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
p
a
r
k
s
,
o
p
e
n
sp
a
c
e
,
t
r
a
i
l
s
a
n
d
p
a
t
h
w
a
y
s
.
Community Input Consistency/Editing
3.
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
p
e
o
p
l
e
a
n
d
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
i
s
a
m
a
j
o
r
c
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
f
a
c
i
n
g
ci
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
e
d
i
n
e
n
h
a
n
c
i
n
g
t
he
s
e
n
s
e
o
f
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
S
a
f
e
t
r
a
i
l
s
,
pa
t
h
s
a
n
d
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
,
a
n
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
w
i
t
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
c
a
l
m
i
n
g
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
w
e
a
v
e
th
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
t
o
g
e
t
h
e
r
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
p
r
i
d
e
a
n
d
id
e
n
t
i
t
y
.
3.
Im
p
r
o
v
e
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
Co
n
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
p
e
o
p
l
e
a
n
d
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
i
s
a
m
a
j
o
r
c
h
a
l
l
e
n
g
e
f
a
c
i
n
g
ci
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
e
d
i
n
e
n
h
a
n
c
i
n
g
t
he
s
e
n
s
e
o
f
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
C
r
e
a
t
e
a
well -
co
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
a
n
d
s
S
af
e
s
y
s
t
e
m
o
f
tr
a
i
l
s
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
paths,
an
d
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
, a
n
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
w
i
t
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
c
a
l
m
i
n
g
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
th
a
t
weave
th
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
t
o
g
e
t
h
e
r
,
a
n
d
en
h
a
n
c
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
p
r
i
d
e
a
n
d
id
e
n
t
i
t
y
,
a
n
d
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
.
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
i
n
g
r
o
u
t
e
s
to
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
Community Input Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
4
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
V
i
s
i
o
n
20
4
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
V
i
s
i
o
n
Reason for Change(s)
de
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
4.
M
o
b
i
l
i
t
y
Th
e
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
m
o
v
e
a
b
o
u
t
s
a
f
e
l
y
a
n
d
ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
l
y
m
u
s
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
v
a
r
i
e
t
y
of
t
r
a
v
e
l
m
o
d
e
s
t
o
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
a
l
l
o
f
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
’
s
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
,
s
o
a
c
h
i
l
d
is
a
b
l
e
t
o
w
a
l
k
o
r
b
i
k
e
s
a
f
e
l
y
t
o
s
c
h
o
o
l
,
a
s
e
n
i
o
r
c
i
t
i
z
e
n
c
a
n
a
c
c
e
s
s
b
u
s
li
n
e
s
a
n
d
a
c
o
m
m
u
t
e
r
c
a
n
r
e
l
y
o
n
t
h
e
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
h
i
g
h
w
a
y
,
b
i
k
e
w
a
y
a
n
d
tr
a
n
s
i
t
s
y
s
t
e
m
t
o
g
e
t
t
o
w
o
r
k
.
S
tr
e
e
t
s
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
p
a
t
h
s
a
n
d
b
i
k
e
pa
t
h
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
c
o
m
p
r
i
s
e
a
n
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
s
y
s
t
e
m
o
f
f
u
l
l
y
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
a
n
d
in
t
e
r
e
s
t
i
n
g
r
o
u
t
e
s
t
o
a
l
l
d
e
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
4.
En
h
a
n
c
e
Mo
b
i
l
i
t
y
En
s
u
r
e
t
h
e
T
h
e
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
m
o
v
e
a
b
o
u
t
s
a
f
e
l
y
a
n
d
e
e
ff
i
c
i
e
n
t
ly
and safe
mo
v
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
c
a
r
s
,
t
r
u
c
k
s
,
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
,
p
e
de
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
,
b
i
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
a
n
d
d
i
s
a
b
l
e
d
pe
r
s
o
n
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
to
f
u
l
l
y
m
u
s
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
v
a
r
i
e
t
y
o
f
tr
a
v
e
l
m
o
d
e
s
t
o
ac
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
al
l
o
f
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’
s
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
’
s
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
,
wo
r
k
e
r
s
,
v
i
s
i
t
o
r
s
a
n
d
s
t
u
d
e
n
t
s
,
o
f
a
l
l
a
g
e
s
a
n
d
a
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
s
o
a
c
h
i
l
d
i
s
a
b
l
e
to
w
a
l
k
o
r
b
i
k
e
s
a
f
e
l
y
t
o
s
c
h
o
o
l
,
a
s
e
n
i
o
r
c
i
t
i
z
e
n
c
a
n
a
c
c
e
s
s
b
u
s
l
i
n
e
s
an
d
a
c
o
m
m
u
t
e
r
c
a
n
r
e
l
y
o
n
t
h
e
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
h
i
g
h
w
a
y
,
b
i
k
e
w
a
y
a
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
sy
s
t
e
m
t
o
g
e
t
t
o
w
o
r
k
.
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
p
a
t
h
s
a
n
d
b
i
k
e
p
a
t
h
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
co
m
p
r
i
s
e
a
n
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
s
y
s
t
e
m
o
f
f
u
l
l
y
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
a
n
d
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
i
n
g
ro
u
t
e
s
t
o
a
l
l
d
e
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Community Input Consistency/Editing
5.
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
d
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Gr
e
a
t
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
a
r
e
m
u
l
t
i
-
d
i
m
e
n
s
i
o
na
l
p
l
a
c
e
s
w
h
e
r
e
p
e
o
p
l
e
o
f
a
l
l
in
c
o
m
e
a
n
d
a
g
e
g
r
o
u
p
s
r
e
s
i
d
e
,
w
i
t
h
a
f
u
l
l
r
a
n
g
e
o
f
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
l
o
c
a
l
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
,
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
,
e
n
t
e
r
t
a
i
n
m
e
n
t
an
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
.
T
h
e
y
o
f
f
e
r
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a
f
u
l
l
r
a
n
g
e
o
f
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
ch
o
i
c
e
s
t
o
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
c
h
a
n
g
i
n
g
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
n
e
e
d
s
o
f
a
de
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
a
l
l
y
d
i
v
e
r
s
e
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
,
j
o
b
s
a
n
d
da
i
l
y
n
e
e
d
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
w
i
t
h
i
n
e
a
s
y
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
.
5.
En
s
u
r
e
a
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
d
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Of
f
e
r
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a f
u
l
l
r
a
n
g
e
o
f
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
c
h
o
i
c
e
s
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
t
o
ac
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
t
h
e
c
h
a
n
g
i
n
g
n
e
e
d
s
o
f
a
d
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
a
l
l
y
a
n
d
ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
a
l
l
y
d
i
v
e
r
s
e
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
,
w
h
il
e
a
l
s
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g
a
f
u
l
l
r
a
n
g
e
o
f
su
p
p
o
r
t
u
s
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
G
r
e
a
t
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
a
r
e
m
u
l
t
i
-
d
i
m
e
n
s
i
o
n
a
l
pl
a
c
e
s
w
h
e
r
e
p
e
o
p
l
e
o
f
a
l
l
i
n
c
o
m
e
a
n
d
a
g
e
g
r
o
u
p
s
r
e
s
i
d
e
,
w
i
t
h
a
f
u
l
l
ra
n
g
e
o
f
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
a
n
d
lo
c
a
l
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
,
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
em
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
,
e
n
t
e
r
t
a
i
n
m
e
n
t
, an
d
re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
,
a
n
d
d
a
i
l
y
n
e
e
d
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
wi
t
h
i
n
e
a
s
y
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
.
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
.
T
h
e
y
o
f
f
e
r
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a
f
u
l
l
r
a
n
g
e
o
f
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
c
h
o
i
c
e
s
t
o
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
c
h
a
n
g
i
n
g
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
ne
e
d
s
o
f
a
d
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
a
l
l
y
d
i
v
e
r
s
e
po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
,
jo
b
s
a
n
d
d
a
i
l
y
n
e
e
d
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
w
i
t
h
i
n
e
a
s
y
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
.
Community Input Consistency/Editing
6.
V
i
b
r
a
n
t
,
M
i
x
e
d
-
U
s
e
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
a
n
d
“
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
”
Gr
e
a
t
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
h
a
v
e
a
w
e
l
l
-
d
e
f
i
n
e
d
e
d
g
e
a
n
d
a
g
e
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
a
l
ce
n
t
e
r
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
s
d
r
a
w
n
i
n
t
o
.
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
m
u
s
t
be
v
i
b
r
a
n
t
,
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
,
f
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
a
n
d
c
o
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
e
w
i
t
h
i
n
v
i
t
i
n
g
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
p
a
c
e
s
a
n
d
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
s
e
r
v
ic
e
s
t
h
a
t
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
d
a
i
l
y
n
e
e
d
s
o
f
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
w
i
t
h
“
p
e
o
p
l
e
-
a
c
t
i
v
a
t
e
d
”
s
p
a
c
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
c
o
f
f
e
e
s
h
o
p
s
,
bo
o
k
s
t
o
r
e
s
,
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
,
m
o
v
i
e
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
s
a
n
d
p
e
r
s
o
n
a
l
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
s
u
c
h
as
l
a
u
n
d
r
i
e
s
a
n
d
h
a
i
r
s
a
l
o
n
s
.
6.
Su
p
p
o
r
t
Vi
b
r
a
n
t
a
n
d
,
Mi
x
e
d
-
U
s
e
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
a
n
d
“
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
”
Gr
e
a
t
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
h
a
v
e
a
w
e
l
l
-
d
e
f
i
n
e
d
e
d
g
e
a
n
d
a
g
e
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
a
l
ce
n
t
e
r
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
s
d
r
a
w
n
in
t
o
.
E
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’
s
m
a
j
o
r
mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
a
n
d
c
C
om
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
n
o
d
e
s
a
r
e
m
u
s
t
b
e
vi
b
r
a
n
t
,
su
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
,
at
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
,
f
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
a
n
d
c
o
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
e
w
i
t
h
i
n
v
i
t
i
n
g
ac
t
i
v
e
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
p
a
c
e
s
a
n
d
pe
r
s
o
n
a
l
se
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
h
a
t
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
d
a
i
l
y
ne
e
d
s
o
f
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
w
o
r
k
e
r
s
.
w
i
t
h
“
p
e
o
p
l
e
-
a
c
t
i
v
a
t
e
d
”
s
p
a
c
e
s
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
c
o
f
f
e
e
s
h
o
p
s
,
b
o
o
k
s
t
o
r
e
s
,
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
,
m
o
v
i
e
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
s
a
n
d
pe
r
s
o
n
a
l
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
l
a
u
n
d
r
i
e
s
a
n
d
h
a
i
r
s
a
l
o
n
s
.
Community Input Consistency/Editing
7.
A
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
p
r
i
d
e
s
i
t
s
e
l
f
o
n
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
s
,
a
n
d
b
e
a
u
t
i
f
u
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
n
d
p
a
r
k
s
t
h
a
t
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
an
d
c
o
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
f
a
b
r
i
c
.
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
fr
a
m
e
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
a
n
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
t
o
o
f
f
e
r
re
l
a
x
i
n
g
,
i
n
t
i
m
a
t
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
p
a
c
e
s
.
7.
En
s
u
r
e
At
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
En
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
s
a
n
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
r
e
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
an
d
w
e
l
l
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
s
o
t
h
e
y
c
a
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
p
r
i
d
e
s
i
t
s
e
l
f
o
n
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
at
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
s
,
a
n
d
b
e
a
u
t
i
f
u
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
n
d
pa
r
k
s
t
h
a
t
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
co
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
f
a
b
r
i
c
by
fr
a
m
i
n
g
m
a
j
o
r
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
n
d
o
f
f
e
r
i
n
g
.
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
f
r
a
m
e
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
Community Input Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
5
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
V
i
s
i
o
n
20
4
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
V
i
s
i
o
n
Reason for Change(s)
an
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
t
o
o
f
f
e
r
re
l
a
x
i
n
g
d
e
s
i
r
a
b
l
e
and,
ac
t
i
v
e
,
in
t
i
m
a
t
e
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
p
a
c
e
s
.
8.
D
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
e
m
b
r
a
c
e
s
a
n
d
c
e
l
e
b
r
a
t
e
s
it
s
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
a
n
d
s
e
e
k
s
t
o
o
f
f
e
r
a
ra
n
g
e
o
f
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
t
h
a
t
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
n
e
e
d
s
o
f
t
h
e
f
u
l
l
s
p
e
c
t
r
u
m
o
f
de
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
a
n
d
a
g
e
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
i
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
T
h
e
c
i
t
y
w
i
l
l
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
eq
u
a
l
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
a
l
l
o
f
i
t
s
r
e
si
d
e
n
t
s
,
d
e
s
p
i
t
e
a
g
e
,
c
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
o
r
ph
y
s
i
c
a
l
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
.
8.
Em
b
r
a
c
e
Di
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
Ce
l
e
b
r
a
t
e
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’s
e
m
b
r
a
c
e
s
a
n
d
c
e
l
e
b
r
a
t
e
s
i
t
s
di
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
by
of
f
e
r
i
n
g
a
n
d
s
e
e
k
s
t
o
o
f
f
e
r
a
r
a
n
g
e
o
f
ho
u
s
i
n
g
,
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
t
h
a
t
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
n
e
e
d
s
o
f
t
h
e
f
u
l
l
s
p
e
c
t
r
u
m
of the
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
,
w
h
i
l
e
e
n
s
u
r
i
n
g
e
q
u
a
l
o
f
d
e
m
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
a
n
d
a
g
e
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
i
n
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
T
h
e
c
i
t
y
w
i
l
l
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
e
q
u
a
l
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
fo
r
a
l
l
of its
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
w
o
r
k
e
r
s
r
e
g
a
r
d
l
e
s
s
o
f
,
d
e
s
p
i
t
e
ag
e
,
c
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
o
r
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
.
Community Input Consistency/Editing
9.
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
Th
e
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
s
y
s
t
e
m
i
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
h
a
s
a
n
i
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
r
e
p
u
t
a
t
i
o
n
fo
r
h
i
g
h
a
c
h
i
e
v
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
e
x
c
e
l
l
e
n
c
e
.
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
th
a
t
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
l
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
(
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
,
l
i
b
r
a
r
i
e
s
,
b
o
o
k
s
t
o
r
e
s
,
i
n
t
e
r
n
e
t
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
)
a
r
e
e
s
s
e
n
t
i
a
l
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
f
a
b
r
i
c
a
n
d
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
.
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
s
e
e
k
s
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
cu
l
t
u
r
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
a
ne
w
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
h
a
l
l
.
9.
Su
p
p
o
r
t
Ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
Pr
e
s
e
r
v
e
a
n
d
s
up
p
o
r
t
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’
s
ex
c
e
l
l
e
n
t
p
u
b
l
i
c
T
h
e
ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
al
sy
s
t
e
m
by
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
i
n
g
wi
t
h
l
o
c
a
l
s
c
h
o
o
l
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
a
n
d
D
e
A
n
z
a
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
t
o
im
p
r
o
v
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
i
n
f
r
a
s
tr
u
c
t
u
r
e
,
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
i
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
ha
s
a
n
i
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
r
e
p
u
t
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
h
i
g
h
a
c
h
i
e
v
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
e
x
c
e
l
l
e
n
c
e
.
Qq
ua
l
i
t
y
Ci
t
y
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
t
h
a
t
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
l
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
(
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
,
li
b
r
a
r
i
e
s
,
b
o
o
k
s
t
o
r
e
s
,
i
n
t
e
r
n
e
t
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
)
,
a
n
d
e
x
p
a
n
d
i
n
g
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
.
a
r
e
e
s
s
e
n
t
i
a
l
t
o
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
f
a
b
r
i
c
a
n
d
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
.
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
s
e
e
k
s
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
c
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
a
n
e
w
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
a
n
d
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
h
a
l
l
.
Community Input Consistency/Editing
10
.
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
s
e
e
k
s
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
o
r
r
e
s
t
or
e
c
r
e
e
k
s
a
n
d
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
i
r
na
t
u
r
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
,
l
i
m
i
t
u
r
b
a
n
u
s
e
s
t
o
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
u
r
b
a
n
a
r
e
a
s
,
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
e
su
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
i
ng
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
,
re
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
,
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
i
n
g
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
a
n
d
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
i
n
g
w
a
s
t
e
w
h
i
l
e
pr
e
s
e
r
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
t
e
r
r
a
i
n
,
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
a
n
d
v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
10
.
Pr
es
e
r
v
e
t
h
e
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
Pr
e
s
e
r
v
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’
s
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
by
e
n
h
a
n
c
i
n
g
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
s
e
e
k
s
t
o
en
h
a
n
c
e
or
r
e
s
t
o
r
in
g
e
cr
e
e
k
s
a
n
d
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
i
r
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
,
li
m
i
t
in
g
ur
b
a
n
u
s
e
s
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
u
r
b
a
n
iz
e
d
a
r
e
a
s
,
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
e
s
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
co
n
c
e
p
t
s
en
c
o
u
r
a
g
i
n
g
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
,
pr
o
m
o
t
i
n
g
su
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
s
,
i
mp
r
o
v
i
n
g
s
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
m
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
a
d
a
p
t
i
n
g
t
o
c
l
i
m
a
t
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
,
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
,
co
n
s
e
r
v
i
n
g
energy
re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
a
n
d
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
i
n
g
w
a
s
t
e
.
w
h
i
l
e
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
t
e
r
r
a
i
n
,
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
a
n
d
v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
Community Input Consistency/Editing
11
.
F
i
s
c
a
l
S
e
l
f
R
e
l
i
a
n
c
e
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
C
i
t
y
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
w
i
l
l
s
t
r
i
v
e
t
o
b
e
f
i
s
c
a
l
l
y
s
e
l
f
-
r
e
l
i
a
n
t
t
o
en
s
u
r
e
t
h
e
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
d
e
l
i
v
e
r
e
s
s
e
n
t
i
a
l
h
i
g
h
-
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
o
i
t
s
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
.
11
.
En
s
u
r
e
Fi
s
c
a
l
S
e
l
f
R
e
l
i
a
n
c
e
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
C
i
t
y
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
w
i
l
l
s
t
r
i
v
e
t
o
b
e
fi
s
c
a
lly s
e
l
f
-
re
l
i
a
n
c
e
r
e
l
i
a
n
t
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
t
he
C
i
t
y
’
s
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
e
co
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
de
l
i
v
e
r
e
s
s
e
n
t
i
a
l
, h
i
g
h
-
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
m
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
services
an
d
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
an
d
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
to
it
s
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
Community Input Consistency/Editing
12
.
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
v
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p
Th
e
c
i
t
y
i
s
c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
d
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
pm
e
n
t
o
f
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
l
e
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p
,
lo
c
a
l
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
s
,
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
e
p
o
p
u
l
a
c
e
a
n
d
m
a
k
i
n
g
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
m
o
r
e
ac
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
a
n
d
v
i
s
i
b
l
e
t
o
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
.
12
.
En
s
u
r
e
a
Re
s
p
o
n
s
i
v
e
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
L
e
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
b
e
a
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
l
e
a
d
e
r
i
n
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
a
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
p
a
r
e
n
t
mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
; p
r
o
m
o
t
e
T
h
e
c
i
t
y
i
s
c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
d
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
of
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
l
e
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p
a
n
d
,
lo
c
a
l
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
s
w
i
t
h
l
o
c
a
l
a
n
d
Community Input Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
6
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
V
i
s
i
o
n
20
4
0
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
V
i
s
i
o
n
Reason for Change(s)
re
g
i
o
n
a
l
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
; a
n
d
r
e
m
a
i
n
f
l
e
x
i
b
l
e
a
n
d
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
v
e
t
o
c
h
a
n
g
i
n
g
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
n
e
e
d
s
.
,
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
e
p
o
p
u
l
a
ce
a
n
d
m
a
k
i
n
g
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
m
o
r
e
ac
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
a
n
d
v
i
s
i
b
l
e
t
o
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
7
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
La
n
d
U
s
e
a
n
d
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
Th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
t
a
b
l
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
a
n
d
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
p
o
l
i
c
y
a
n
d
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
2
0
0
5
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
A
,
B
a
n
d
C
.
T
h
e
2
0
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
a
r
e
s
h
o
w
n
i
n
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
c
o
l
u
m
n
because
th
e
s
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
t
h
e
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
p
o
l
i
c
y
u
p
d
a
t
e
s
e
n
v
i
s
i
o
n
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
(
e
.
g
.
,
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
,
l
e
g
a
l
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y
/
e
d
i
t
o
r
i
a
l
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
)
.
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
GO
A
L
A
:
Cr
e
a
t
e
a
A
c
o
h
e
s
i
v
e
,
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
w
i
t
h
a
d
i
s
t
in
c
t
i
v
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
a
n
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
a
b
l
e
e
d
g
e
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
1
:
Co
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
e
d
F
o
c
u
s
ed
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
Mi
x
e
d
-
U
s
e
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
Ur
b
a
n
C
e
n
t
e
r
s
Co
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
I
n
th
e
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
(
s
h
o
w
n
i
n
F
i
g
u
r
e
2
-
B
)
u
r
b
a
n
no
d
e
s
an
d
s
e
l
e
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
wh
e
r
e
of
f
i
c
e
, an
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
us
e
s
a
r
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
,
f
o
c
u
s
h
i
g
h
e
r
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
h
e
i
g
h
t
s
wh
e
r
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
i
n
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
,
ga
t
e
w
a
y
s
,
a
n
d
n
o
d
e
s
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
M
i
x
e
d
-
U
s
e
.
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
h
e
s
e
l
e
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
ur
b
a
n
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
:
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
Ar
e
a
s
,
E
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
Ce
n
t
e
r
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
t
r
o
n
g
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
, em
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
an
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
ce
n
t
e
r
s
, to
a
n
d
t
h
e
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
En
h
a
n
c
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
fr
o
m
t
h
e
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
an
d
em
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
to
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
i
n
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
8
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
A
c
c
e
s
s
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
an
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
p
a
t
h
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
n
e
w
an
d
re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
ac
c
e
s
s
t
o
a
n
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
3
:
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
Pl
a
n
[
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
o
n
e
w
P
o
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
6
.
D
Cr
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
]
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
34
:
A
c
t
i
v
e
S
p
a
c
e
s
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
a
c
t
i
v
e
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
l
y
-or
i
e
n
t
e
d
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
to
l
o
c
a
t
e
i
n
t
h
e
mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
u
r
b
a
n
ce
n
t
e
r
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
A
c
t
i
v
e
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
U
s
e
s
.
R
e
c
r
u
i
t
ac
t
i
v
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
,
ca
f
e
s
,
b
o
o
k
s
t
o
r
e
s
,
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
e
n
t
e
r
t
a
i
n
m
e
n
t
us
e
s
a
n
d
m
o
v
i
e
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
s
t
o
l
o
c
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
Va
l
l
c
o
o
r
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
ar
e
a
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
Z
o
n
i
n
g
I
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
in
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
g
r
e
a
t
e
r
f
l
e
x
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
n
t
h
e
al
l
o
w
a
b
l
e
f
l
o
o
r
a
r
e
a
r
a
t
i
o
w
h
e
r
e
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
an
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
s
e
p
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
us
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
“
S
e
n
s
e
o
f
P
l
a
c
e
.
”
I
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
cr
e
a
t
e
a
“
s
e
n
s
e
o
f
p
l
a
c
e
,
”
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
l
a
n
s
t
o
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
th
a
t
a
r
e
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
t
o
w
a
r
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
s
c
a
l
e
d
ou
t
d
o
o
r
u
s
e
s
a
l
o
n
g
m
a
j
o
r
b
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
p
a
r
k
s
,
p
l
a
z
a
s
,
s
e
a
t
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
,
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
di
n
i
n
g
, a
n
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
r
t
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
Pu
b
l
i
c
A
r
t
s
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
p
o
l
i
c
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
A
r
e
a
s
.
E
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
p
u
b
l
i
c
ar
e
a
s
a
r
e
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
t
o
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
a
n
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
n
e
e
d
s
o
f
su
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Community Input CC Direction
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
9
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
84
:
D
i
s
t
i
n
c
t
i
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
s
I
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
i
s
t
i
n
c
t
i
v
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
ga
t
e
w
a
y
s
e
n
t
r
y
fe
a
t
u
r
e
s
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
at
m
a
j
o
r
e
n
t
r
y
po
i
n
t
s
t
h
a
t
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
u
n
i
q
u
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
fo
r
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
P
l
a
n
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
pl
a
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
Cc
it
y
’
s
e
n
t
r
y
p
o
i
n
t
s
,
a
n
d
i
.
I
de
n
t
i
f
y
lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
f
o
r
th
e
ga
t
e
w
a
y
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
T
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
.
Ac
c
e
n
t
u
a
t
e
th
e
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
ed
g
e
s
w
i
t
h
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
r
o
a
d
p
a
t
t
e
r
n
s
t
h
a
t
a
n
n
o
u
n
c
e
en
t
r
y
i
n
t
o
a
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
s
p
a
c
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
N
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
R
e
v
i
e
w
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
ad
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
d
e
f
i
n
e
d
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
s
n
e
x
t
to
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
e
n
t
r
y
p
o
i
n
t
s
wh
e
n
t
h
e
y
a
r
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
o
r
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
pe
d
f
o
r
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
to
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
t
h
e
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
5
:
D
i
s
t
i
n
c
t
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
Pl
a
n
f
o
r
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
t
h
a
t
h
a
v
e
d
i
s
t
i
n
c
t
i
v
e
ed
g
e
s
,
a
n
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
a
b
l
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
us
e
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
62
1
:
U
n
i
q
u
e
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
Ch
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
t
h
a
t
h
a
v
e
a
n
ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
s
t
y
l
e
,
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
b
a
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
o
r
lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
t
h
a
t
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
t
o
a
un
i
q
u
e
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s,
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
p
l
a
n
s
t
h
a
t
pr
e
s
e
r
v
e
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
i
r
u
n
i
q
u
e
q
u
a
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
P
l
a
n
s
.
I
n
i
t
i
a
t
e
o
r
re
s
p
o
n
d
t
o
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
Ci
t
y
Co
u
n
c
i
l
ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
f
o
r
a
n
y
b
u
d
g
e
t
i
n
g
n
e
e
d
e
d
t
o
pr
e
p
a
r
e
t
h
e
p
l
a
n
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
0
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
Z
o
n
i
n
g
.
R
e
s
p
o
n
d
to
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
f
r
o
m
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
g
r
o
u
p
s
t
o
de
v
e
l
o
p
z
o
n
i
n
g
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
t
h
e
i
r
in
t
e
r
e
s
t
i
n
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
i
n
g
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
,
su
c
h
a
s
s
i
n
g
l
e
s
t
o
r
y
h
o
m
e
s
o
r
d
i
s
t
i
n
c
t
i
v
e
ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
M
e
r
r
i
m
a
n
-
S
a
n
t
a
L
u
c
i
a
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
.
Al
l
o
w
l
e
g
a
l
l
y
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
du
p
l
e
x
e
s
t
o
r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
b
o
u
n
d
e
d
b
y
Sa
n
t
a
L
u
c
i
a
R
o
a
d
,
A
l
c
a
l
d
e
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
72
2
:
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
De
v
e
l
o
p
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
f
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
s
t
r
e
e
t
en
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
s
i
n
e
a
c
h
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
t
h
a
t
h
e
l
p
cr
e
a
t
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
,
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
,
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
fo
r
s
o
c
i
a
l
i
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
an
d
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
,
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
,
re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
d
e
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
C
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
P
a
t
t
e
r
n
s
.
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
c
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
p
a
t
t
e
r
n
s
a
n
d
el
i
m
i
n
a
t
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
b
a
r
r
i
e
r
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
an
d
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
an
d
p
a
r
k
s
,
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
c
e
s
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
S
t
r
e
e
t
T
r
e
e
s
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
u
n
i
f
o
r
m
st
r
e
e
t
t
r
e
e
p
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
s
f
o
r
e
a
c
h
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4
.
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
E
n
t
r
i
e
s
.
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
de
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
a
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
E
n
t
r
y
P
l
a
n
f
o
r
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
e
n
t
r
y
p
o
i
n
t
s
.
De
f
i
n
e
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
e
n
t
r
i
e
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
,
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
o
r
l
a
n
d
f
o
r
m
s
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
t
o
t
h
e
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
1
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
fo
r
m
a
l
o
r
r
u
r
a
l
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
.
Ve
h
i
c
u
l
a
r
e
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
i
c
g
a
t
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
l
y
b
e
di
s
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
,
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
t
h
e
y
i
s
o
l
a
t
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
5
.
S
t
r
e
e
t
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
D
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
if
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
w
i
d
t
h
s
,
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
or
l
i
g
h
t
f
i
x
t
u
r
e
s
a
r
e
d
e
s
i
r
a
b
l
e
f
o
r
a
n
y
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
68
:
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
C
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
M
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
s
w
i
t
h
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
f
r
o
m
n
o
i
s
e
,
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
,
li
g
h
t
a
n
d
v
i
s
u
a
l
l
y
i
n
t
r
u
s
i
v
e
e
f
f
e
c
t
s
f
r
o
m
m
o
r
e
in
t
e
n
s
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
t
h
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
bu
f
f
e
r
i
n
g
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
w
a
l
l
s
,
ac
t
i
v
i
t
y
,
li
m
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
s
i
t
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
me
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
Cr
e
a
t
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
r
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
p
l
a
n
s
th
a
t
r
e
d
u
c
e
i
n
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
n
e
w
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
:
da
y
l
i
g
h
t
p
l
a
n
e
s
f
o
r
s
i
n
g
l
e
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
mi
n
i
m
u
m
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
sc
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
,
a
c
o
u
s
t
i
c
a
l
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
,
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
or
i
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
r
e
a
s
a
w
a
y
f
r
o
m
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
n
d
l
i
m
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
n
h
o
u
r
s
o
f
op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
7
:
D
e
f
i
n
e
d
a
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
d
Ci
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
[
m
o
v
e
d
t
o
C
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
El
e
m
e
n
t
]
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
98
7
:
B
o
u
n
d
a
r
i
e
s
B
e
t
w
e
e
n
L
a
n
d
Us
e
s
Re
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
Ba
s
e
bo
u
n
d
a
r
i
e
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
cl
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
u
p
o
n
l
o
t
l
i
n
e
s
o
f
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
la
n
d
u
s
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
,
a
n
d
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
o
r
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
b
a
r
r
i
e
r
s
o
r
a
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
2
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
co
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
n
y
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
.
S
h
o
w
t
h
e
p
r
e
c
i
s
e
bo
u
n
d
a
r
y
o
n
t
h
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
m
a
p
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
10
8
8
:
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
R
a
n
g
e
s
on
t
h
e
M
a
p
Re
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
t
h
a
t
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
r
a
n
g
e
s
o
n
th
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
M
a
p
(F
i
g
u
r
e
X
-
X
)
an
d
i
t
s
le
g
e
n
d
s
h
o
w
s
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
r
e
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
f
o
r
a
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
a
r
e
a
.
T
h
e
a
c
t
u
a
l
gr
o
s
s
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
-
u
n
i
t
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
ma
y
b
e
s
l
i
g
h
t
l
y
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
if
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
t
h
e
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
o
f
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
i
n
g
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
GO
A
L
B
:
En
s
u
r
e
a
A
co
m
p
a
c
t
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
o
u
n
d
a
r
y
t
h
a
t
a
l
l
o
w
s
ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
d
e
l
i
v
e
r
y
o
f
m
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
1
01
:
U
r
b
a
n
A
r
e
a
s
Fo
c
u
s
Fo
c
u
s
C
i
t
y
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
i
n
u
r
b
a
n
i
z
e
d
a
r
e
a
s
w
h
e
r
e
th
e
C
i
t
y
h
a
s
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
a
g
r
e
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
se
r
v
i
c
e
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
12
9
:
L
o
n
g
T
e
r
m
G
r
o
w
t
h
B
o
u
n
d
a
r
y
Al
l
o
w
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
l
o
n
g
-
t
e
r
m
g
r
o
w
t
h
bo
u
n
d
a
r
y
o
n
l
y
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
a
co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
r
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
’
s
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
Pl
a
n
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
1
13
:
U
r
b
a
n
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
A
r
e
a
E
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
Wo
r
k
w
i
t
h
th
e
c
i
t
i
e
s
o
f
Lo
s
A
l
t
o
s
,
S
a
n
J
o
s
e
a
n
d
Su
n
n
y
v
a
l
e
,
a
s
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
,
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
bo
u
n
d
a
r
i
e
s
t
h
a
t
d
e
f
i
n
e
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
m
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
se
r
v
i
c
e
a
r
e
a
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
T
a
x
-
S
h
a
r
i
n
g
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
en
t
e
r
i
n
g
i
n
t
o
t
a
x
-
s
h
a
r
i
n
g
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
t
h
ad
j
a
c
e
n
t
j
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
de
s
i
r
e
d
b
o
u
n
d
a
r
y
r
e
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
1
42
:
A
n
n
e
x
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
Sm
a
l
l
,
Un
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
Co
u
n
t
y
P
o
c
k
e
t
s
I
s
l
a
n
d
s
Ac
t
i
v
e
l
y
p
u
r
s
u
e
t
h
e
a
n
n
e
x
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
un
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
Cou
n
t
y
p
o
c
k
e
t
s
wi
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
u
r
b
a
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
r
e
a
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
3
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
th
e
C
r
e
s
t
o
n
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
,
w
h
i
c
h
w
i
l
l
b
e
an
n
e
x
e
d
o
n
a
p
a
r
c
e
l
-
b
y
-
p
a
r
c
e
l
b
a
s
i
s
w
i
t
h
n
e
w
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
O
t
h
e
r
re
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
s
m
a
l
l
,
un
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
i
s
l
a
n
d
s
w
i
l
l
a
r
e
a
s
m
a
y
b
e
an
n
e
x
e
d
a
s
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
.
GO
A
L
C
:
Es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
aA
hi
g
h
s
e
n
s
e
o
f
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
a
n
d
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
1
35
:
U
r
b
a
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
F
o
r
m
s
Co
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
e
u
r
b
a
n
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
m
s
i
n
th
e
mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
,
C
i
t
y
Ce
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
/
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s
a
n
d
Se
t
b
a
c
k
s
R
a
t
i
o
s
.
T
h
e
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
h
e
i
g
h
t
an
d
se
t
b
a
c
k
r
a
t
i
o
s
fo
r
n
e
w
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
i
n
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
a
r
e
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
F
i
g
u
r
e
2
-
D
.
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’
s
t
a
l
l
e
r
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
.
T
h
e
he
i
g
h
t
a
t
t
h
e
e
d
g
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
a
r
e
a
s
i
s
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
wh
e
n
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
l
o
w
-
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
u
s
e
s
.
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
r
a
t
i
o
s
a
r
e
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
to
a
s
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
r
e
d
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
o
f
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
t
o
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
i
s
a
c
h
i
e
v
e
d
.
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
Mu
l
t
i
p
l
e
-
S
t
o
r
y
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
.
Al
l
o
w
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
s
t
o
r
y
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
in
V
a
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
,
N
o
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
,
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
He
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
if
i
t
i
s
f
o
u
n
d
t
h
a
t
ne
a
r
b
y
ad
j
a
c
e
n
t
l
o
w
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
w
i
l
l
no
t
su
f
f
e
r
f
r
o
m
p
r
i
v
a
c
y
i
n
t
r
u
s
i
o
n
o
r
b
e
ov
e
r
w
h
e
l
m
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
s
c
a
l
e
o
f
a
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
o
r
gr
o
u
p
o
f
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
be
a
d
v
e
r
s
e
l
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
e
d
b
y
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
se
t
b
a
c
k
s
t
o
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
a
c
t
i
v
e
u
s
e
s
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
st
r
e
e
t
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
a
n
d
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
wi
t
h
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
l
o
w
-
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
i
n
g
l
e
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
32
.
C
o
h
e
s
i
v
e
n
e
s
s
o
f
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
4
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
En
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
s
c
a
l
e
a
n
d
i
n
t
e
r
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
s
o
f
ne
w
a
n
d
o
l
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
c
o
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
a
c
h
ot
h
e
r
.
I
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
h
a
s
m
a
n
y
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
,
t
h
e
y
sh
o
u
l
d
b
e
g
r
o
u
p
e
d
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
f
e
e
l
i
n
g
o
f
sp
a
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
43
.
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
S
c
a
l
e
.
Av
o
i
d
a
b
r
u
p
t
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
c
a
l
e
.
A
gr
a
d
u
a
l
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
l
o
w
-
r
i
s
e
t
o
m
i
d
-
r
i
s
e
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
a
c
h
i
e
v
e
d
b
y
u
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
lo
w
-
r
i
s
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
t
t
h
e
e
d
g
e
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
si
t
e
.
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
t
h
e
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
o
f
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
sc
a
l
e
o
n
b
o
t
h
s
i
d
e
s
o
f
a
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
54
.
M
u
l
t
i
-
F
a
m
i
l
y
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
F
o
r
m
F
l
o
o
r
A
r
e
a
R
a
t
i
o
s
.
E
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
th
e
fl
o
o
r
a
r
e
a
r
a
t
i
o
s
m
a
s
s
a
n
d
b
u
l
k
o
f
m
u
l
t
i
-
fa
m
i
l
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
a
r
e
co
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
w
i
t
h
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
i
n
t
h
e
su
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
.
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
m
i
x
o
f
u
n
i
t
t
y
p
e
s
an
d
s
i
z
e
s
,
a
n
d
a
v
o
i
d
a
p
r
e
p
o
n
d
e
r
a
n
c
e
o
f
ex
c
e
s
s
i
v
e
l
y
l
a
r
g
e
u
n
i
t
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
65
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
.
R
e
v
i
s
e
t
h
e
Pl
a
n
n
e
d
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
R-
3
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s t
o
re
f
l
e
c
t
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
n
t
o
f
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
54
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
1
46
:
A
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
S
i
t
e
De
s
i
g
n
Em
p
h
a
s
i
z
e
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
s
i
t
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
du
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
b
y
gi
v
i
n
g
c
a
r
e
f
u
l
a
t
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
t
o
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
c
a
l
e
,
m
a
s
s
an
d
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
,
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
,
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
,
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
sc
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
o
f
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
lo
a
d
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
,
an
d
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
s
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
o
f
eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
l
o
a
d
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
S
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
S
i
t
e
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
.
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
s
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
s
i
t
e
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
5
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
a
v
o
i
ds
m
o
n
o
t
o
n
o
u
s
a
n
d
mo
n
o
l
i
t
h
i
c
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
s
i
t
e
pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
t
e
c
h
n
i
q
u
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
ar
t
i
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
s
e
g
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
w
a
l
l
a
n
d
ro
o
f
p
l
a
n
e
s
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
s
c
a
l
e
d
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
d
e
t
a
i
l
s
,
vi
s
u
a
l
o
p
e
n
i
n
g
s
i
n
t
h
e
w
a
l
l
p
l
a
n
e
,
s
m
a
l
l
e
r
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
f
o
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
s
i
n
p
r
o
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
he
i
g
h
t
,
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
s
t
o
r
y
se
t
b
a
c
k
s
, a
n
d
h
i
e
r
a
r
c
h
i
c
a
l
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
H
i
g
h
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
Ma
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
.
Se
t
h
i
g
h
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
f
o
r
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
qu
a
l
i
t
y
b
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
i
n
g
u
s
e
o
f
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
,
pa
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
l
y
a
s
a
c
c
e
n
t
s
,
a
n
d
a
u
t
h
e
n
t
i
c
ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
d
e
t
a
i
l
i
n
g
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
r
e
a
l
b
a
l
c
o
n
i
e
s
an
d
w
i
n
d
o
w
t
r
i
m
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
P
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
N
e
w
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
Pl
a
c
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
o
u
t
o
f
s
i
g
h
t
,
be
h
i
n
d
o
r
u
n
d
e
r
n
e
a
t
h
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
.
R
e
v
i
e
w
t
h
e
de
s
i
g
n
o
f
t
h
e
b
e
l
o
w
-
l
e
v
e
l
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
th
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
po
l
i
c
e
p
o
l
i
c
i
n
g
ag
e
n
c
y
t
o
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
cr
i
m
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4
.
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
S
c
r
e
e
n
i
n
g
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
n
e
w
a
n
d
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
in
t
o
u
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
v
a
u
l
t
s
o
r
w
i
t
h
i
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
t
o
mi
n
i
m
i
z
e
v
i
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
a
n
d
r
e
d
u
c
e
t
h
e
i
r
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
t
o
de
t
r
a
c
t
f
r
o
m
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
.
W
h
e
n
a
b
o
v
e
-
gr
o
u
n
d
o
r
o
u
t
s
i
d
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
i
s
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
,
sc
r
e
e
n
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
45
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
.
In
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
’
s
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
m
a
j
o
r
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
,
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
c
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
s
i
m
u
l
a
t
e
d
mo
d
e
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
p
h
o
t
o
m
o
n
t
a
g
e
o
f
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
s
a
n
d
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
re
v
i
e
w
b
y
C
i
t
y
s
t
a
f
f
o
r
a
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
6
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
56
.
D
e
s
i
g
n
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
.
Ut
i
l
i
z
e
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
d
e
s
i
g
n
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
th
e
C
i
t
y
a
n
d
M
o
n
t
a
V
i
s
t
a
,
i
n
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
n
g
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
U
p
d
a
t
e
t
h
e
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
or
c
r
e
a
t
e
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
f
o
r
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
i
f
ne
e
d
e
d
t
o
a
c
h
i
e
v
e
a
c
o
h
e
s
iv
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
.
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’
s
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
s
t
o
c
k
i
s
l
a
r
g
e
l
y
s
i
n
g
l
e
fa
m
i
l
y
;
7
0
%
i
n
t
h
e
y
e
a
r
2
0
0
0
.
E
v
e
n
s
o
,
t
h
e
nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
m
u
l
t
i
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
u
n
i
t
s
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
b
y
o
v
e
r
1,
5
0
0
u
n
i
t
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
1
9
9
0
a
n
d
2
0
0
0
,
w
i
t
h
t
h
r
e
e
no
t
a
b
l
e
n
e
w
a
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
co
m
p
l
e
x
e
s
c
o
m
p
r
i
s
i
n
g
mo
s
t
o
f
t
h
o
s
e
u
n
i
t
s
.
S
e
v
e
n
t
y
-
f
i
v
e
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
o
f
th
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
b
u
i
l
d
-
o
u
t
o
f
th
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
a
r
e
m
u
l
t
i
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
,
d
u
e
t
o
t
h
e
em
p
h
a
s
i
s
o
n
i
n
f
i
l
l
,
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
Cl
e
a
r
l
y
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
m
u
l
t
i
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
d
e
s
i
g
n
i
s
c
r
i
t
i
c
a
l
to
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
a
h
i
g
h
-
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
l
i
v
i
n
g
en
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
6
.
V
i
e
w
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
.
D
e
v
i
s
e
a
n
d
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
p
o
l
i
c
y
t
o
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
s
to
l
i
m
i
t
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
h
e
i
g
h
t
s
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
hi
l
l
s
i
d
e
v
i
e
w
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
1
75
:
M
u
l
t
i
-
F
a
m
i
l
y
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
De
s
i
g
n
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
s
u
p
e
r
i
o
r
l
i
v
i
n
g
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
mu
l
t
i
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
d
w
e
l
l
i
n
g
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
R
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
t
o
S
t
r
e
e
t
.
Re
l
a
t
e
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
,
u
t
i
l
i
z
i
n
g
po
r
c
h
e
s
o
r
s
t
o
o
p
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
P
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
o
f
O
u
t
d
o
o
r
A
r
e
a
s
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
a
r
e
a
s
,
b
o
t
h
p
a
s
s
i
v
e
a
n
d
ac
t
i
v
e
,
a
n
d
g
e
n
e
r
o
u
s
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
th
e
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
s
f
o
r
m
u
l
t
i
-fa
m
i
l
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
.
Al
l
o
w
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
o
n
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
ar
e
a
s
w
h
e
n
e
v
e
r
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
1
68
:
S
i
n
g
l
e
-
F
a
m
i
l
y
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
7
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
De
s
i
g
n
Pr
e
s
e
r
v
e
t
h
e
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
o
f
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
b
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
i
n
g
n
e
w
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
b
e
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
Gu
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
.
E
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
an
d
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
t
h
e
s
i
z
e
,
s
t
y
l
e
, an
d
ma
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
o
f
n
e
w
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
t
h
e
re
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
p
r
i
v
a
c
y
im
p
a
c
t
s
.
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
t
h
e
re
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
i
f
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
me
a
s
u
r
e
s
a
r
e
n
e
e
d
e
d
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
co
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
t
o
re
v
i
e
w
l
a
r
g
e
r
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
h
o
m
e
s
a
n
d
h
o
m
e
s
re
q
u
i
r
i
n
g
e
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
32
.
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
.
Re
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
t
h
a
t
s
o
m
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
a
r
e
i
n
tr
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
,
a
n
d
a
d
d
e
d
A
l
l
o
w
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
de
s
i
g
n
fl
e
x
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
f
o
r
n
e
w
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
s
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
wi
t
h
i
n
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
i
n
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
w
i
l
l
b
e
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
23
1
9
:
C
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
L
o
t
S
i
z
e
s
En
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
z
o
n
i
n
g
,
s
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
l
o
t
l
i
n
e
ad
j
u
s
t
m
e
n
t
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
l
o
t
s
i
z
e
o
r
l
o
t
de
s
i
g
n
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
t
h
e
n
e
e
d
t
o
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
l
o
t
p
a
t
t
e
r
n
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
M
i
n
i
m
u
m
L
o
t
S
i
z
e
.
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
h
e
mi
n
i
m
u
m
l
o
t
s
i
z
e
i
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
n
e
w
l
o
t
s
i
z
e
is
s
m
a
l
l
e
r
t
h
a
n
a
n
d
n
o
t
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
su
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
8
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
F
l
a
g
L
o
t
s
.
C
r
e
a
t
e
f
l
a
g
l
o
t
s
i
n
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
s
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
w
h
e
n
t
h
e
y
a
r
e
t
h
e
o
n
l
y
re
a
s
o
n
a
b
l
e
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
t
h
a
t
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
s
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
lo
t
p
a
t
t
e
r
n
i
n
t
h
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
20
1
7
:
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
u
n
i
q
u
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
c
h
o
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
di
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
p
a
r
t
s
o
f
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
S
t
r
e
e
t
-
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
.
Or
i
e
n
t
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
t
o
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
b
y
pl
a
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
m
t
o
w
a
r
d
t
h
e
f
r
o
n
t
o
f
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
Or
i
e
n
t
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
t
o
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
b
y
pr
o
v
i
d
i
n
g
e
n
t
r
i
e
s
a
n
d
s
t
o
o
p
s
f
r
o
n
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
st
r
e
e
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
W
i
d
t
h
s
.
De
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
an
d
w
i
d
t
h
s
.
I
n
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
ar
e
a
A
r
e
a
,
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
n
e
x
t
t
o
t
h
e
c
u
r
b
,
an
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
w
i
d
e
e
n
o
u
g
h
t
o
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
a
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
.
Ne
w
a
n
d
re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
ar
e
a
s
h
a
l
l
a
l
s
o
c
o
n
f
o
r
m
to
th
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
A
r
e
a
St
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
P
l
a
n
.
I
n
t
h
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
,
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
s
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
d
fr
o
m
t
h
e
c
u
r
b
by
a
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
st
r
i
p
p
a
r
k
w
a
y
w
i
t
h
t
r
e
e
s
f
r
o
m
th
e
c
u
r
b
,
i
n
m
o
s
t
c
a
s
e
s
,
a
n
d
b
e
o
f
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
wi
d
t
h
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
M
e
d
i
a
n
s
.
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
a
j
o
r
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
wi
t
h
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
m
e
d
i
a
n
s
t
o
b
e
a
u
t
i
f
y
t
h
e
st
r
e
e
t
s
a
n
d
s
e
r
v
e
as
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
c
a
l
m
i
n
g
d
e
v
i
c
e
s
t
o
se
p
a
r
a
t
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
m
a
n
a
g
e
l
e
f
t
-
t
u
r
n
mo
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4
.
S
t
r
e
e
t
T
r
e
e
s
.
M
a
x
i
m
i
z
e
t
r
e
e
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
l
o
n
g
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
be
t
w
e
e
n
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
n
d
/
o
r
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
s
a
n
d
th
e
i
r
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
s
t
r
e
e
t
c
u
r
b
l
i
n
e
s
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
9
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
la
n
d
u
s
e
v
i
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Th
e
s
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
an
d
p
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
o
f
t
r
e
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
t
h
e
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
:
Av
o
i
d
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
s
w
i
t
h
n
e
a
r
b
y
p
o
w
e
r
l
i
n
e
s
;
Av
o
i
d
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
r
e
e
ro
o
t
s
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
a
r
e
a
s
;
Av
o
i
d
u
s
e
o
f
i
n
v
a
s
i
v
e
,
n
o
n
-
n
a
t
i
v
e
t
r
e
e
s
;
an
d
Wh
e
n
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
ar
i
s
e
,
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
i
n
v
a
s
i
v
e
,
n
o
n
-
n
a
t
i
v
e
t
r
e
e
s
w
i
t
h
ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
n
a
t
i
v
e
t
r
e
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
5
.
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
u
b
s
t
a
n
t
i
a
l
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
t
a
l
l
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
c
o
r
n
e
r
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
6
.
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
T
r
e
e
s
.
Es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
a
pa
l
e
t
t
e
o
f
d
i
v
e
r
s
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
u
n
i
f
o
r
m
t
r
e
e
pl
a
n
t
i
n
g
s
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
ea
c
h
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
th
a
t
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
s
a
n
d
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
s
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
ch
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
7
.
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
i
g
n
s
.
Wh
e
n
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
is
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
,
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
n
e
w
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
i
g
n
s
a
t
m
a
j
o
r
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
u
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
m
o
r
i
o
n
lo
g
o
o
n
t
h
e
s
i
g
n
.
R
e
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
f
o
n
t
s
i
z
e
of
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
n
a
m
e
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
r
e
a
d
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
18
2
1
:
C
o
n
t
e
x
t
o
f
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
La
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
In
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
su
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
C
i
t
y
r
e
v
i
e
w
,
s
e
l
e
c
t
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
de
s
i
g
n
s
t
h
a
t
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
c
o
n
t
e
x
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
U
r
b
a
n
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
.
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
ur
b
a
n
i
z
e
d
a
r
e
a
s
w
i
t
h
f
o
r
m
a
l
a
r
r
a
n
g
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
or
n
a
m
e
n
t
a
l
p
l
a
n
t
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
R
u
r
a
l
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
2
0
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
tr
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
t
o
a
m
o
r
e
r
u
r
a
l
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
o
n
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
w
e
s
t
o
f
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
,
a
n
d
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
w
e
s
t
o
f
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
an
d
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
o
u
t
h
o
f
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
85
O
r
a
n
g
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
.
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
r
u
r
a
l
a
n
d
s
e
m
i
-
ru
r
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
l
l
y
w
i
t
h
n
a
t
i
v
e
p
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
s
.
GO
A
L
D
:
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
T
t
hr
i
v
i
n
g
an
d
,
ba
l
a
n
c
e
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
22
1
9
:
J
o
b
s
/
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
St
r
i
v
e
f
o
r
a
m
o
r
e
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
d
r
a
t
i
o
o
f
j
o
b
s
a
n
d
ho
u
s
i
n
g
u
n
i
t
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
a
n
d
M
i
x
e
d
-
U
s
e
.
Al
l
o
c
a
t
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
o
r
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
on
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
si
t
e
s
,
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
l
o
n
g
-
t
e
r
m
C
i
t
y
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
(
S
e
e
P
o
l
i
c
y
2
-
3
8
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
)
S
t
r
i
v
e
t
o
a
c
h
i
e
v
e
a
ba
l
a
n
c
e
d
j
o
b
s
/
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
r
a
t
i
o
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
th
e
po
l
i
c
i
e
s
a
n
d
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
(
S
e
e
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
3
)
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
I
m
p
a
c
t
o
n
L
o
c
a
l
Sc
h
o
o
l
s
.
S
i
n
c
e
t
h
e
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
sc
h
o
o
l
s
(
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
a
n
d
h
i
g
h
s
c
h
o
o
l
)
i
s
a
pr
i
m
a
r
y
a
s
s
e
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
,
c
a
r
e
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
t
a
k
e
n
t
o
en
s
u
r
e
th
a
t
an
y
n
e
w
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
pa
y
s
t
h
e
st
a
t
u
t
o
r
i
l
y
m
a
n
d
a
t
e
d
i
m
p
a
c
t
f
e
e
s
t
o
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
e
an
y
a
d
v
e
r
s
e
w
i
l
l
n
o
t
a
d
v
e
r
s
e
l
y
im
p
a
c
t
to
th
e
s
e
sy
s
t
e
m
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Community Input Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
23
2
0
:
D
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
c
i
t
y
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
of
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
’
s
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
M
a
p
(F
i
g
u
r
e
2
-
X
X
)
an
d
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
M
a
p
(
F
i
g
u
r
e
2
-
X
X
)
,
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
,
E
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
Ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
u
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
s
e
a
r
e
a
s
i
n
or
d
e
r
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
i
r
d
i
s
t
i
n
c
t
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
a
n
d
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
23
2
0
:
D
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
c
i
t
y
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
of
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
’
s
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
M
a
p
(
F
i
g
u
r
e
2
-
X
X
)
a
n
d
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
M
a
p
(
F
i
g
u
r
e
2
-
X
X
)
,
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
,
E
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
Ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
u
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
s
e
a
r
e
a
s
i
n
or
d
e
r
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
i
r
d
i
s
t
i
n
c
t
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
a
n
d
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
23
2
0
:
D
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
o
f
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
c
i
t
y
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
of
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
’
s
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
M
a
p
(
F
i
g
u
r
e
2
-
X
X
)
and
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
M
a
p
(
F
i
g
u
r
e
2
-
X
X
)
,
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
,
E
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
Ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
u
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
s
e
a
r
e
a
s
i
n
or
d
e
r
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
i
r
d
i
s
t
i
n
c
t
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
a
n
d
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
2
1
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
fu
n
c
t
i
o
n
s
,
w
h
i
l
e
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
r
e
d
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
l
e
v
e
l
s
o
f
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
C
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
e
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
T
a
b
l
e
2
-
A
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
TA
B
L
E
2
-
A
(
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
2
0
1
4
-
2
0
4
0
)
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
T
o
t
a
l
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
1
,
0
4
0
,
2
3
1
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
7
0
1
,
4
1
3
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
6
0
0
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
1
,
8
9
5
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
1
0
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
7
0
,
0
0
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
1
2
5
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
2
0
0
No
r
t
h
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
3
0
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
5
0
,
0
0
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
1
0
0
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
1
0
0
He
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
3
1
5
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
3
7
5
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
1
,
0
0
0
No
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
2
5
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
1
0
,
0
0
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
0
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
170
fu
n
c
t
i
o
n
s
,
w
h
i
l
e
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
r
e
d
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
l
e
v
e
l
s
o
f
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
C
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
e
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
T
a
b
l
e
2
-
A
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
TA
B
L
E
2
-
A
(
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
2
0
1
4
-
2
0
4
0
)
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
T
o
t
a
l
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
2
,
5
4
0
,
2
3
1
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
1
,
3
4
3
,
6
7
9
1
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
8
3
9
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
3
,
3
1
6
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
2
5
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
1
5
0
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
4
0
0
No
r
t
h
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
7
5
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
1
5
0
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
3
5
0
He
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
7
5
0
,
0
0
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
4
3
9
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
1
,
7
0
0
No
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
2
0
0
.
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
2
5
,
0
0
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
1
0
0
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
1
7
0
fu
n
c
t
i
o
n
s
,
w
h
i
l
e
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
r
e
d
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
l
e
v
e
l
s
o
f
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
C
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
e
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
T
a
b
l
e
2
-
A
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
TA
B
L
E
2
-
A
(
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
2
0
1
4
-
2
0
4
0
)
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
T
o
t
a
l
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
4
,
0
4
0
,
2
3
1
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
1
,
3
4
3
,
6
7
9
1
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
1
,
3
3
9
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
4
,
4
2
1
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
5
0
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
3
0
0
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
5
3
0
No
r
t
h
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
9
0
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
3
0
0
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
8
2
5
He
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
2
,
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
7
5
0
,
0
0
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
6
3
9
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
2
,
1
0
0
No
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
2
5
,
0
0
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
1
0
0
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
1
7
0
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
2
2
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
So
u
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
1
0
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
5
0
,
0
0
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
0
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
1
5
0
Ot
h
e
r
No
n
-
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
/
M
i
x
e
d
-
U
s
e
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
Ar
e
a
s
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
5
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
1
2
,
0
0
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
0
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
7
0
Ma
j
o
r
E
m
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
6
2
5
,
0
0
0
Bu
b
b
R
o
a
d
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
Ar
e
a
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
1
5
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
0
Mo
n
t
a V
i
s
t
a
Vi
l
l
a
g
e
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
5
,
2
3
1
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
9
,
4
1
3
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
7
0
Ot
h
e
r
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
13
5
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
Al
l
o
c
a
t
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
th
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
p
e
r
m
i
t
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
u
n
l
e
s
s
su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
o
r
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
u
n
i
t
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
M
a
j
o
r
co
m
p
a
n
i
e
s
Em
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
.
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
e
e
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
o
ff
i
c
e
s
p
a
c
e
f
o
r
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
ma
j
o
r
co
m
p
a
n
i
e
s
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
in
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
Re
t
a
i
n
a
p
o
o
l
o
f
al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
s
q
u
a
r
e
fe
e
t
to
b
e
d
r
a
w
n
d
o
w
n
b
y
c
o
m
p
a
n
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
So
u
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
2
5
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
1
2
5
,
0
0
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
0
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
2
0
1
Ot
h
e
r
No
n
-
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
/
M
i
x
e
d
-
U
s
e
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
Ar
e
a
s
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
1
0
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
7
5
,
0
0
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
0
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
1
2
0
Ma
j
o
r
E
m
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
6
2
5
,
0
0
0
Bu
b
b
R
o
a
d
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
Ar
e
a
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
7
0
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
0
Mo
n
t
a V
i
s
t
a
Vi
l
l
a
g
e
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
Al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
1
0
,
2
3
1
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
1
8
,
6
7
9
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
7
5
Ot
h
e
r
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
3
0
0
1
Re
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
V
a
l
l
c
o
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
Al
l
o
c
a
t
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
th
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
p
e
r
m
i
t
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
u
n
l
e
s
s
su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
o
r
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
u
n
i
t
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
M
a
j
o
r
co
m
p
a
n
i
e
s
Em
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
.
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
e
e
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
o
ff
i
c
e
s
p
a
c
e
f
o
r
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
ma
j
o
r
co
m
p
a
n
i
e
s
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
in
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
So
u
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
5
0
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
1
2
5
,
0
0
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
0
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
2
7
5
Ot
h
e
r
No
n
-
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
/
M
i
x
e
d
-
U
s
e
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
Ar
e
a
s
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
1
0
,
0
0
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
7
5
,
0
0
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
:
0
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
5
0
Ma
j
o
r
E
m
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
6
2
5
,
0
0
0
Bu
b
b
R
o
a
d
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
Ar
e
a
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
0
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
Mo
n
t
a V
i
s
t
a
Vi
l
l
a
g
e
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
f
)
:
1
5
,
2
3
1
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
f
)
:
1
2
,
8
9
5
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
2
7
Ot
h
e
r
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
u
n
i
t
s
)
:
24
1
1
Re
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
V
a
l
l
c
o
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
Al
l
o
c
a
t
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
th
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
p
e
r
m
i
t
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
u
n
l
e
s
s
su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
o
r
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
u
n
i
t
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
M
a
j
o
r
co
m
p
a
n
i
e
s
Em
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
.
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
e
e
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
o
ff
i
c
e
s
p
a
c
e
f
o
r
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
2
3
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
s
a
l
e
s
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
o
r
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
he
a
d
q
u
a
r
t
e
r
s
(
s
e
e
T
a
b
l
e
2
-A)
,
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
th
e
c
i
t
y
’
s
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
p
o
l
i
c
y
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
co
h
e
s
i
v
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
a
n
d
o
f
f
i
c
e
p
a
r
k
s
.
Ne
w
o
f
f
i
c
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
m
u
s
t
d
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
e
th
a
t
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
o
s
i
t
i
v
e
l
y
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
s
t
o
th
e
f
i
s
c
a
l
w
e
l
l
b
e
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4
.
F
l
e
x
i
b
l
e
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
A
l
l
o
w
fl
e
x
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
a
m
o
n
g
t
h
e
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
t
o
ea
c
h
g
e
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
a
l
a
r
e
a
.
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
m
a
y
b
e
re
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
f
r
o
m
o
n
e
g
e
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
a
l
a
r
e
a
t
o
an
o
t
h
e
r
i
f
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
a
n
d
i
f
n
o
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
en
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
,
p
a
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
l
y
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
,
a
r
e
id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
5
.
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
.
R
e
v
i
e
w
al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
pe
r
i
o
d
i
c
a
l
l
y
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
pr
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
m
e
e
t
C
i
t
y
n
e
e
d
s
a
n
d
g
o
a
l
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
6
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Un
u
s
e
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
d
i
n
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
m
a
y
b
e
r
e
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
t
h
e
e
x
p
i
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
e
a
c
h
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
,
a
f
t
e
r
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
7
.
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
H
e
i
g
h
t
.
F
o
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
re
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
g
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
h
e
i
g
h
t
a
s
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
n
ap
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
th
e
M
a
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s
f
i
g
u
r
e
o
f
t
h
e
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
,
a
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
a
s
t
h
e
p
r
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
n
t
g
r
o
u
n
d
f
l
o
o
r
fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
u
s
e
a
n
d
b
e
o
f
s
u
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
d
e
p
t
h
a
n
d
he
a
d
h
e
i
g
h
t
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
v
i
a
b
l
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
s
p
a
c
e
.
Re
t
a
i
n
a
p
o
o
l
o
f
al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
s
q
u
a
r
e
fe
e
t
to
b
e
d
r
a
w
n
d
o
w
n
b
y
c
o
m
p
a
n
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
s
a
l
e
s
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
o
r
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
he
a
d
q
u
a
r
t
e
r
s
(
S
e
e
T
a
b
l
e
2
-A)
,
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
th
e
c
i
t
y
’
s
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
p
o
l
i
c
y
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
co
h
e
s
i
v
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
a
n
d
o
f
f
i
c
e
p
a
r
k
s
.
Ne
w
o
f
f
i
c
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
m
u
s
t
d
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
e
th
a
t
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
o
s
i
t
i
v
e
l
y
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
s
t
o
th
e
f
i
s
c
a
l
w
e
l
l
b
e
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4
.
F
l
e
x
i
b
l
e
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
A
l
l
o
w
fl
e
x
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
a
m
o
n
g
t
h
e
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
t
o
ea
c
h
g
e
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
a
l
a
r
e
a
.
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
m
a
y
b
e
re
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
f
r
o
m
o
n
e
g
e
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
a
l
a
r
e
a
t
o
an
o
t
h
e
r
i
f
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
a
n
d
i
f
n
o
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
en
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
,
p
a
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
l
y
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
,
a
r
e
id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
5
.
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
.
R
e
v
i
e
w
al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
pe
r
i
o
d
i
c
a
l
l
y
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
pr
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
m
e
e
t
C
i
t
y
n
e
e
d
s
a
n
d
g
o
a
l
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
6
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Un
u
s
e
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
d
in
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
m
a
y
b
e
re
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
t
h
e
e
x
p
i
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
e
a
c
h
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
,
a
f
t
e
r
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
he
a
r
i
n
g
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
7
.
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
H
e
i
g
h
t
.
F
o
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
re
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
g
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
h
e
i
g
h
t
a
s
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
n
ap
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
th
e
M
a
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s
f
i
g
u
r
e
o
f
t
h
e
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
,
a
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
a
s
t
h
e
p
r
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
n
t
g
r
o
u
n
d
f
l
o
o
r
fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
u
s
e
a
n
d
b
e
o
f
s
u
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
d
e
p
t
h
a
n
d
he
a
d
h
e
i
g
h
t
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
v
i
a
b
l
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
s
p
a
c
e
.
ma
j
o
r
co
m
p
a
n
i
e
s
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
in
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
Re
t
a
i
n
a
p
o
o
l
o
f
al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
s
q
u
a
r
e
fe
e
t
to
b
e
d
r
a
w
n
d
o
w
n
b
y
c
o
m
p
a
n
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
s
a
l
e
s
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
o
r
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
he
a
d
q
u
a
r
t
e
r
s
(
S
e
e
T
a
b
l
e
2
-A)
,
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
th
e
c
i
t
y
’
s
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
p
o
l
i
c
y
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
co
h
e
s
i
v
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
a
n
d
o
f
f
i
c
e
p
a
r
k
s
.
Ne
w
o
f
f
i
c
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
m
u
s
t
d
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
e
th
a
t
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
o
s
i
t
i
v
e
l
y
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
s
t
o
th
e
f
i
s
c
a
l
w
e
l
l
b
e
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4
.
F
l
e
x
i
b
l
e
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
A
l
l
o
w
fl
e
x
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
a
m
o
n
g
t
h
e
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
t
o
ea
c
h
g
e
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
a
l
a
r
e
a
.
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
m
a
y
b
e
re
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
f
r
o
m
o
n
e
g
e
o
g
r
a
p
h
i
c
a
l
a
r
e
a
t
o
an
o
t
h
e
r
i
f
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
a
n
d
i
f
n
o
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
en
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
,
p
a
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
l
y
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
,
a
r
e
id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
5
.
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
v
i
e
w
.
R
e
v
i
e
w
al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
pe
r
i
o
d
i
c
a
l
l
y
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
pr
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
m
e
e
t
C
i
t
y
n
e
e
d
s
a
n
d
g
o
a
l
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
6
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Un
u
s
e
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
c
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
d
in
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
m
a
y
b
e
re
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
t
h
e
e
x
p
i
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
e
a
c
h
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
,
a
f
t
e
r
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
he
a
r
i
n
g
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
7
.
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
H
e
i
g
h
t
.
F
o
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
re
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
g
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
h
e
i
g
h
t
a
s
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
n
ap
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
th
e
M
a
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s
f
i
g
u
r
e
o
f
t
h
e
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
,
a
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
a
s
t
h
e
p
r
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
n
t
g
r
o
u
n
d
f
l
o
o
r
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
2
4
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
u
s
e
a
n
d
b
e
o
f
s
u
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
d
e
p
t
h
a
n
d
he
a
d
h
e
i
g
h
t
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
v
i
a
b
l
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
s
p
a
c
e
.
No
t
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
(N
o
t
e
:
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
pr
o
g
r
a
m
p
o
l
i
c
y
is
o
n
l
y
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
t
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
he
i
g
h
t
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
d
e
r
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
B
a
n
d
C
,
an
d
w
o
u
l
d
n
o
t
b
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
un
d
e
r
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
)
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
3
.
A
:
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
At
t
h
e
d
i
s
c
r
e
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
a
n
d
a
s
in
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
i
n
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
la
n
d
u
s
e
po
l
i
c
i
e
s
,
t
he
Ci
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
m
a
y
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
h
e
i
g
h
t
s
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
fr
o
m
t
h
e
ma
x
i
m
u
m
ba
s
e
h
e
i
g
h
t
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
i
n
ga
t
e
w
a
y
s
a
n
d
n
o
d
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
M
a
p
o
f
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
,
if
a
pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
a
n
d
pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
wi
t
h
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
C
a
t
e
g
o
r
i
e
s
:
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
,
a
b
o
v
e
a
n
d
b
e
y
o
n
d
pr
o
j
e
c
t
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
/
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
t
h
a
t
ca
n
b
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
b
y
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
s
a
n
d
a
g
r
e
e
d
up
o
n
b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
in
c
l
u
d
e
b
u
t
a
r
e
n
o
t
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
to
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
:
1.
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
M
o
b
i
l
i
t
y
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
Co
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
w
a
r
d
s
a
n
d
/
o
r
cr
e
a
t
e
ne
w
o
r
e
x
p
a
n
d
e
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
a
n
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
b
o
v
e
t
h
o
s
e
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
t
o
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
Con
t
r
i
b
u
t
io
n
s
t
o
w
a
r
d
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
tr
a
n
s
i
t
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
an
d
/
or
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
a
d
a
p
t
i
v
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
,
a
b
o
v
e
t
h
o
s
e
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
t
o
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
e
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
a
s
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
2
5
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
o
r
Con
t
r
i
b
u
t
io
n
s
t
o
w
a
r
d
on
g
o
i
n
g
op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
o
f
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
s
h
u
t
t
l
e
s
(
t
o
m
o
v
e
p
e
o
p
l
e
ar
o
u
n
d
t
o
k
e
y
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
)
ab
o
v
e
t
h
a
t
w
h
i
c
h
m
i
g
h
t
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
b
y
th
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
t
o
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
.
2.
Sc
h
o
o
l
s
a
n
d
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
Co
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
w
a
r
d
ca
p
i
t
a
l
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
/
o
r
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
l
a
n
d
an
d
/
o
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
be
n
e
f
i
t
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
,
a
b
o
v
e
t
h
a
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
t
o
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
3.
Af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
a
b
o
v
e
a
n
d
b
e
y
o
n
d
Be
l
o
w
M
a
r
k
e
t
R
a
t
e
(
B
M
R
)
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
u
n
i
t
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
a
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
;
Lan
d
t
o
b
u
i
l
d
a
n
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
pr
o
j
e
c
t
;
Co
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
w
a
r
d
bu
i
l
d
in
g
,
b
u
y
i
n
g
or
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
i
n
g
a
n
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
pr
o
j
e
c
t
;
o
r
Te
a
c
h
e
r
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
.
4.
Pu
b
l
i
c
,
Ar
t
a
n
d
C
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Co
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
w
a
r
d
a
n
d
/
o
r
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
io
n
of
a
ne
w
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
se
n
i
o
r
,
t
e
e
n
o
r
y
o
u
t
h
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y;
Co
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
w
a
r
d
a
n
d
/
o
r
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
ga
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
sp
a
c
e
(
e
.
g
.
c
o
n
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
p
a
c
e
o
r
cu
l
t
u
r
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
)
o
r
a
m
u
s
e
u
m
.
5.
Pa
r
k
s
a
n
d
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
Co
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
w
a
r
d
n
e
w
o
r
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
2
6
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
ex
p
a
n
d
e
d
pu
b
l
i
c
l
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
b
u
t
pr
i
v
a
t
e
l
y
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
pa
r
k
l
a
n
d
; o
r
Ne
w
p
a
r
k
a
n
d
/
o
r
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
w
i
t
h
a
pr
o
j
e
c
t
(
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
r
o
o
f
t
o
p
p
a
r
k
s
o
p
e
n
to
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
)
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
.
U
p
d
a
t
e
t
h
e
Zo
n
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
a
n
d
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
s
to
c
o
d
i
f
y
t
h
e
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
ns
o
f
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Be
n
e
f
i
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
R
e
t
a
i
l
C
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
.
I
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
to
p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
,
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
a
n
d
ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
/
o
r
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
,
n
o
i
s
e
a
n
d
a
i
r
qu
a
l
i
t
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
.
I
n
o
r
d
e
r
to
q
u
a
l
i
f
y
f
o
r
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
h
e
i
g
h
t
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
,
t
h
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
co
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
t
h
e
p
r
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
n
t
u
s
e
al
o
n
g
t
h
e
g
r
o
u
n
d
f
l
o
o
r
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
a
n
d
b
e
o
f
su
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
d
e
p
t
h
a
n
d
h
e
a
d
h
e
i
g
h
t
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
vi
a
b
l
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
s
p
a
c
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
Of
f
e
r
s
o
f
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
m
u
s
t
b
e
a
b
o
v
e
an
d
b
e
y
o
n
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
-
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
e
n
t
i
t
l
e
m
e
n
t
pr
o
c
e
s
s
.
T
h
e
f
u
l
l
d
e
t
a
i
l
s
a
n
d
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
th
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
re
l
a
t
i
v
e
s
i
z
e
a
n
d
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
o
f
t
h
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
a
n
d
f
o
r
m
a
l
i
z
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
a
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
3
.
B
:
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
co
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
M
i
x
e
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
m
a
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
2
7
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
un
i
t
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
us
e
,
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
w
e
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
,
an
d
i
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
31
2
4
:
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
Ro
a
d
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
Ar
e
a
Cr
e
a
t
e
a
n
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
,
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
an
d
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
v
i
l
l
a
g
e
al
o
n
g
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
,
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
i
n
g
o
f
th
r
e
e
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
a
r
e
a
s
.
E
a
c
h
a
r
e
a
w
i
l
l
b
e
ma
s
t
e
r
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
,
w
i
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
a
t
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
in
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
a
r
e
a
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Th
i
s
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
w
i
l
l
co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
b
e
a
p
r
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
n
t
l
y
mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
ar
e
a
w
i
t
h
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
us
e
s
a
n
d
a
s
e
r
i
e
s
o
f
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
.
A
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
w
i
l
l
be
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
w
i
t
h
th
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
.
A
m
e
d
i
u
m
-
de
n
s
i
t
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
w
i
l
l
b
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
i
n
th
e
m
i
d
-
b
l
o
c
k
a
r
e
a
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
t
w
o
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
.
T
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
w
i
l
l
in
c
l
u
d
e
a
n
e
w
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
a
r
k
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
M
i
x
e
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ma
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
,
i
f
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
w
e
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
an
d
i
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
S
e
e
T
a
b
l
e
2
A
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
31
2
4
:
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
Ro
a
d
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
Ar
e
a
Cr
e
a
t
e
a
n
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
,
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
an
d
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
v
i
l
l
a
g
e
al
o
n
g
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
Ro
a
d
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
,
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
i
n
g
o
f
th
r
e
e
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
a
r
e
a
s
.
E
a
c
h
a
r
e
a
w
i
l
l
b
e
ma
s
t
e
r
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
,
w
i
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
a
t
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
in
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
a
r
e
a
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Th
i
s
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
w
i
l
l
co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
b
e
a
p
r
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
n
t
l
y
mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
ar
e
a
w
i
t
h
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
us
e
s
a
n
d
a
s
e
r
i
e
s
o
f
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
.
A
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
w
i
l
l
be
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
w
i
t
h
th
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
.
A
m
e
d
i
u
m
-
de
n
s
i
t
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
w
i
l
l
b
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
mi
d
-
b
l
o
c
k
a
r
e
a
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
t
w
o
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
.
T
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
w
i
l
l
in
c
l
u
d
e
a
n
e
w
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
a
r
k
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
M
i
x
e
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ma
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
,
i
f
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
w
e
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
,
an
d
i
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
S
e
e
T
a
b
l
e
2
A
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
31
2
4
:
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
Ro
a
d
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
Ar
e
a
Cr
e
a
t
e
a
n
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
,
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
an
d
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
v
i
l
l
a
g
e
al
o
n
g
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
Ro
a
d
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
,
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
i
n
g
o
f
th
r
e
e
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
a
r
e
a
s
.
E
a
c
h
a
r
e
a
w
i
l
l
b
e
ma
s
t
e
r
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
,
w
i
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
a
t
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
in
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
a
r
e
a
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Th
i
s
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
w
i
l
l
co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
b
e
a
p
r
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
n
t
l
y
mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
ar
e
a
w
i
t
h
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
us
e
s
a
n
d
a
s
e
r
i
e
s
o
f
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
.
A
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
w
i
l
l
be
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
w
i
t
h
th
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
.
A
m
e
d
i
u
m
-
de
n
s
i
t
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
w
i
l
l
b
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
i
n
th
e
m
i
d
-
b
l
o
c
k
a
r
e
a
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
t
w
o
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
.
T
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
w
i
l
l
in
c
l
u
d
e
a
n
e
w
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
a
r
k
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
M
i
x
e
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ma
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
,
i
f
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
w
e
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
,
an
d
i
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
S
e
e
T
a
b
l
e
2
A
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
2
8
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
9
3
,
6
7
8
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
1
9
3
,
6
7
8
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
6
9
,
5
5
0
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
6
9
,
5
5
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
2
6
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
0
0
1
2
6
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
6
0
0
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
78
4
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
i
e
s
:
10
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
(
t
o
w
n
h
o
m
e
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
Bl
a
n
e
y
a
n
d
B
l
u
e
J
a
y
)
20
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
(a
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
/
t
o
w
n
h
o
m
e
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
B
l
u
e
Ja
y
a
n
d
D
e
A
n
z
a
,
a
n
d
co
n
d
o
s
/
a
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
F
r
a
n
c
o
C
o
u
r
t
)
35
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
(
e
v
e
r
y
t
h
i
n
g
o
n
t
h
e
so
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
D
e
An
z
a
a
n
d
St
e
l
l
i
n
g
,
e
x
c
e
p
t
t
h
e
c
o
n
d
o
s
a
t
th
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
u
s
o
f
F
r
a
n
c
o
C
o
u
r
t
a
l
o
n
g
I
-
28
0
,
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
2
0
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
)
15
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
(
e
v
e
r
y
t
h
i
n
g
o
n
t
h
e
so
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
St
e
l
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
S
u
n
n
y
v
a
l
e
)
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
f
a
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
st
r
e
e
t
s
h
a
l
l
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
t
h
e
s
c
a
l
e
o
f
t
h
e
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
c
r
o
s
s
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
9
3
,
6
7
8
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
1
9
3
,
6
7
8
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
6
9
,
5
5
0
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
6
9
,
5
5
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
2
6
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
0
0
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
6
0
0
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
7
8
4
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y: 3
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
f
a
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
st
r
e
e
t
s
h
a
l
l
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
t
h
e
s
c
a
l
e
o
f
t
h
e
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
c
r
o
s
s
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s:
30
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
Up
t
o
45
f
e
e
t
o
n
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
,
,
o
r
h
H
ig
h
e
r
f
o
r
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
s
(
s
e
e
be
l
o
w
)
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
a
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
p
l
a
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
Ro
a
d
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
A
r
e
a
.
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
9
3
,
6
7
8
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
6
9
,
5
5
0
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
6
9
,
5
5
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
2
6
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
0
0
1
2
6
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
6
0
0
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
7
8
4
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y:
35
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
f
a
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
st
r
e
e
t
s
h
a
l
l
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
t
h
e
s
c
a
l
e
o
f
t
h
e
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
c
r
o
s
s
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s:
30
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
U
p
t
o
45
f
e
e
t
o
n
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
St
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
,
o
r
hH
ig
h
e
r
f
o
r
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
s
(
s
e
e
be
l
o
w
)
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
a
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
p
l
a
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
Ro
a
d
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
A
r
e
a
.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
2
9
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s:
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
he
i
g
h
t
o
f
4
5
f
e
e
t
30
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
Up
t
o
45
f
e
e
t
o
n
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
Ro
a
d
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
c
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
p
l
a
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
Ro
a
d
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Ar
e
a
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
4
.
A
:
N
o
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
a
s
a
h
o
t
e
l
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
de
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
D
e
An
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
ho
t
e
l
u
s
e
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
M
e
d
i
u
m
s
t
o
r
y
h
o
t
e
l
us
e
s
a
n
d
l
o
w
e
r
s
t
o
r
y
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
3
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
:
4
5
f
e
e
t
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
4
.
A
:
N
o
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
En
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
a
s
a
re
g
i
o
n
a
l
h
o
t
e
l
d
e
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
po
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
H
o
t
e
l
,
c
o
n
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
a
n
d
su
p
p
o
r
t
u
s
e
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
M
e
d
i
u
m
s
t
o
r
y
h
o
t
e
l
us
e
s
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
3
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
:
60
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
Wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
:
u
p
t
o
7
5
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
Wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
be
n
e
f
i
t
s
:
u
p
t
o
9
5
f
e
e
t
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
4
.
A
:
N
o
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
En
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
a
s
a
re
g
i
o
n
a
l
h
o
t
e
l
d
e
s
t
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
po
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
H
o
t
e
l
,
c
o
n
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
a
n
d
su
p
p
o
r
t
u
s
e
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
M
e
d
i
u
m
t
o
h
i
g
h
s
t
o
r
y
ho
t
e
l
u
s
e
s
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
3
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
:
60
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
Wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
:
u
p
t
o
7
5
f
e
e
t
,
or
Wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
be
n
e
f
i
t
s
:
u
p
t
o
1
4
5
f
e
e
t
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
4
.
B
:
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
a
s
a
sm
a
l
l
e
r
s
c
a
l
e
,
me
d
i
u
m
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
,
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
t
h
a
t
wi
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
a
n
d
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
al
o
n
g
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
4
.
B
:
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
a
s
a
sm
a
l
l
e
r
s
c
a
l
e
,
me
d
i
u
m
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
,
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
t
h
a
t
wi
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
a
n
d
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
al
o
n
g
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
4
.
B
:
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
a
s
a
sm
a
l
l
e
r
s
c
a
l
e
,
me
d
i
u
m
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
,
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
t
h
a
t
wi
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
a
n
d
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
al
o
n
g
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
.
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
3
0
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
,
qu
a
s
i
-
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
Mi
x
e
d
u
s
e
mu
l
t
i
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
i
s
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
o
n
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
-ea
s
t
e
r
n
co
r
n
e
r
o
f
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
.
Th
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
r
e
l
i
g
i
o
u
s
us
e
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
co
n
t
i
n
u
e
i
t
s
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
S
o
me
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
o
f
f
i
c
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
e
s
t
o
f
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
m
a
y
b
e
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
sh
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
\
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
ie
s
:
1
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
o
n
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
St
e
l
l
i
n
g
,
a
n
d
35
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
o
n
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
St
e
l
l
i
n
g
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s:
30
f
e
e
t
o
n
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
,
an
d
45
f
e
e
t
o
n
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
,
qu
a
s
i
-
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
M
i
x
e
d
us
e
mu
l
t
i
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
i
s
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
o
n
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
-ea
s
t
e
r
n
an
d
s
o
u
t
h
-we
s
t
e
r
n
c
o
r
n
e
r
s
o
f
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
an
d
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
.
Th
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
r
e
l
i
g
i
o
u
s
us
e
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
i
t
s
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
So
m
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
o
f
f
i
c
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
e
s
t
o
f
St
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
m
a
y
b
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
sh
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
3
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s:
45
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
Wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
:
up
t
o
6
0
f
e
e
t
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Mi
x
e
d
u
s
e
m
u
l
t
i
-
fa
m
i
l
y
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
i
s
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
o
n
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
-eastern
an
d
s
o
u
t
h
-we
s
t
e
r
n
c
o
r
n
e
r
s
o
f
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
an
d
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
.
T
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
r
e
l
i
g
i
o
u
s
us
e
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
i
t
s
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
o
f
f
i
c
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
e
s
t
o
f
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
Ro
a
d
m
a
y
b
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
.
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
,
qu
a
s
i
-
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
sh
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
3
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s:
45
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
Wi
t
h
a
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
:
up
t
o
6
0
f
e
e
t
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
25
3
5
:
No
r
t
h
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
No
r
t
h
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
Re
t
a
i
n
th
e
N
o
r
t
h
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
No
r
t
h
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
Ar
e
a
as
a
n
e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
o
f
p
r
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
t
e
l
y
of
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
,
w
i
t
h
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
a
n
d
a
n
c
i
l
l
a
r
y
us
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
h
o
t
e
l
s
a
n
d
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
.
M
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
th
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Al
l
o
w
e
d
u
s
e
s
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
s
of
t
h
o
s
e
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
Z
o
n
e
.
F
u
t
u
r
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
a
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
f
o
r
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
.
Re
t
a
i
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
n
s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
25
3
5
:
No
r
t
h
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
No
r
t
h
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
Re
t
a
i
n
th
e
N
o
r
t
h
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
N
o
r
t
h
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
Ar
e
a
as
a
n
e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
o
f
p
r
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
t
e
l
y
of
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
,
w
i
t
h
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
: Al
l
o
w
e
d
u
s
e
s
co
n
s
i
s
t
s
o
f
t
h
o
s
e
d
e
s
c
r
i
be
d
i
n
t
h
e
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
Pa
r
k
Z
o
n
e
.
F
u
t
u
r
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
a
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
fo
r
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
.
R
e
t
a
i
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
al
l
o
w
e
d
.
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
n
se
l
e
c
t
e
d
a
r
e
a
s
.
Th
i
s
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
be
a
p
r
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
n
t
l
y
o
f
f
i
c
e
,
h
o
t
e
l
a
n
d
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
25
3
5
:
No
r
t
h
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
No
r
t
h
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
Re
t
a
i
n
th
e
N
o
r
t
h
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
N
o
r
t
h
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
Ar
e
a
as
a
n
e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
o
f
p
r
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
t
e
l
y
of
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
,
w
i
t
h
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
: Al
l
o
w
e
d
u
s
e
s
co
n
s
i
s
t
s
o
f
t
h
o
s
e
d
e
s
c
r
i
be
d
i
n
t
h
e
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
Pa
r
k
Z
o
n
e
.
F
u
t
u
r
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
a
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
fo
r
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
.
R
e
t
a
i
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
al
l
o
w
e
d
.
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
n
se
l
e
c
t
e
d
a
r
e
a
s
.
Th
i
s
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
b
e
a
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
3
1
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
ar
e
a
s
.
Th
i
s
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
w
i
l
l
r
e
m
a
i
n
a
k
e
y
no
r
t
h
/
s
o
u
t
h
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
Vi
l
l
a
g
e
a
n
d
I
-
2
8
0
.
I
t
i
s
a
l
s
o
a
k
e
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
r
o
a
d
fo
r
t
h
e
n
e
w
A
p
p
l
e
C
a
m
p
u
s
2
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
An
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
of
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
Fo
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
i
n
th
i
s
a
r
e
a
,
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
Up
t
o
25
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
p
e
r
gr
o
s
s
ac
r
e
.
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
3
3
,
1
4
7
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
1
3
3
,
1
4
7
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
2
,
9
8
1
,
9
3
0
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
3
,
0
6
9
,
6
7
6
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
3
1
5
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
3
1
5
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
5
5
4
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
8
51
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s:
Ma
x
im
u
m
h
e
i
g
h
t
of
60
f
e
e
t
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
w
i
t
h
a
s
e
r
i
e
s
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
.
I
t
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
r
e
ma
y
b
e
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
g
r
o
w
t
h
i
n
t
h
i
s
ar
e
a
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
Fo
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
i
s
ar
e
a
,
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
Up
t
o
25
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
p
e
r
gr
o
s
s
ac
r
e
,
o
r
6
5
d
w
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
H
a
m
p
t
o
n
s
s
i
t
e
.
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
3
3
,
1
4
7
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
1
3
3
,
1
4
7
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
2
,
9
8
1
,
9
3
0
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
3
,
0
6
9
,
6
7
6
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
3
1
5
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
3
1
5
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
5
5
4
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
8
5
1
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s:
Ma
x
im
u
m
h
e
i
g
h
t
o
f
60
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
hH
ig
h
e
r
f
o
r
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
s
(
s
e
e
be
l
o
w
)
pr
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
n
t
l
y
o
f
f
i
c
e
,
h
o
t
e
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
ar
e
a
w
i
t
h
a
s
e
r
i
e
s
o
f
l
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
ce
n
t
e
r
s
.
It
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
r
e
m
a
y
b
e
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
g
r
o
w
t
h
i
n
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
Fo
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
i
n
th
i
s
a
r
e
a
,
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
Up
t
o
25
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
p
e
r
gr
o
s
s
ac
r
e
,
o
r
1
1
0
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
H
a
m
p
t
o
n
s
si
t
e
.
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
3
3
,
1
4
7
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
1
3
3
,
1
4
7
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
2
,
9
8
1
,
9
3
0
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
3
,
0
6
9
,
6
7
6
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
3
1
5
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
3
1
5
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
5
5
4
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
8
5
1
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s:
Ma
x
im
u
m
he
i
g
h
t
o
f
60
f
e
e
t
,
60
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
Hi
g
h
e
r
f
o
r
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
s
(
s
e
e
be
l
o
w
)
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
5
.
A
:
N
o
r
t
h
V
a
l
l
c
o
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
5
.
A
:
N
o
r
t
h
V
a
l
l
c
o
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
5
.
A
:
N
o
r
t
h
V
a
l
l
c
o
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
Community Input
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
3
2
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
V
a
l
l
c
o
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
wi
t
h
u
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
m
a
j
o
r
o
f
f
i
c
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
h
o
t
e
l
s
an
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
M
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
h
o
t
e
l
,
of
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
2
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
:
6
0
f
e
e
t
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
V
a
l
l
c
o
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
wi
t
h
u
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
m
a
j
o
r
o
f
f
i
c
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
h
o
t
e
l
s
an
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
h
o
t
e
l
,
of
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
2
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
,
o
r
6
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
H
a
m
p
t
o
n
s
si
t
e
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
:
60
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
Wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
a
l
o
n
g
W
o
l
f
e
Ro
a
d
:
u
p
t
o
7
5
f
e
e
t
(
r
e
t
a
i
l
n
o
t
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
o
n
e
a
s
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
W
o
l
f
e
Ro
a
d
)
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
w
i
t
h
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
o
n
W
o
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
:
u
p
to
9
5
f
e
e
t
f
o
r
a
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
2
7
5
f
e
e
t
a
s
me
a
s
u
r
e
d
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
.
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
V
a
l
l
c
o
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
a
s
a
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
ho
t
e
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
a
l
o
n
g
W
o
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
h
o
t
e
l
,
of
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
2
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
,
o
r
1
1
0
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
H
a
m
p
t
o
n
s
si
t
e
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
:
60
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
Wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
a
l
o
n
g
W
o
l
f
e
Ro
a
d
:
u
p
t
o
7
5
f
e
e
t
(
r
e
t
a
i
l
n
o
t
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
o
n
e
a
s
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
W
o
l
f
e
Ro
a
d
)
Ha
m
p
t
o
n
s
s
i
t
e
:
u
p
t
o
8
5
f
e
e
t
(
r
e
t
a
i
l
n
o
t
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
)
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
w
i
t
h
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
o
n
W
o
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
:
u
p
t
o
13
0
f
e
e
t
f
o
r
a
d
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
2
7
5
f
e
e
t
a
s
me
a
s
u
r
e
d
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
.
PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
26
2
7
:
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
Cr
e
a
t
e
a
p
o
s
i
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
m
e
m
o
r
a
b
l
e
i
m
a
g
e
a
l
o
n
g
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
o
f
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
;,
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
d
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
ga
t
e
w
a
y
s
an
d
no
d
e
s
;,
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
c
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
an
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
a
l
l
m
o
d
e
s
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Th
i
s
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
w
i
l
l
re
m
a
i
n
t
h
e
c
o
r
e
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
a
r
e
a
i
n
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
w
i
t
h
a
s
e
r
i
e
s
o
f
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
of
f
i
c
e
,
h
o
t
e
l
, a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
.
Imp
r
o
v
e
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
wi
l
l
b
e
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
a
t
st
r
e
e
t
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
26
2
7
:
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
Cr
e
a
t
e
a
p
o
s
i
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
m
e
m
o
r
a
b
l
e
i
m
a
g
e
a
l
o
n
g
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
o
f
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
;,
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
d
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
ga
t
e
w
a
y
s
an
d
no
d
e
s
;,
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
c
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
an
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
a
l
l
m
o
d
e
s
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Th
i
s
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
w
i
l
l
re
m
a
i
n
t
h
e
c
o
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
i
n
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
w
i
t
h
a
s
e
r
i
e
s
o
f
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
of
f
i
c
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
(
e
x
c
e
p
t
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
at
n
o
d
e
s
a
n
d
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
s
m
a
y
b
e
o
f
a
n
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
).
Im
p
r
o
v
e
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
a
t
s
t
r
e
e
t
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
26
2
7
:
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
Cr
e
a
t
e
a
p
o
s
i
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
m
e
m
o
r
a
b
l
e
i
m
a
g
e
a
l
o
n
g
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
o
f
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
;,
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
d
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
ga
t
e
w
a
y
s
an
d
no
d
e
s
;,
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
c
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
an
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
a
l
l
m
o
d
e
s
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Th
i
s
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
w
i
l
l
re
m
a
i
n
t
h
e
c
o
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
i
n
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
w
i
t
h
a
s
e
r
i
e
s
o
f
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
s.
I
t
a
l
s
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
n
e
w
ho
u
s
i
n
g
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
(e
x
c
e
p
t
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
at
n
o
d
e
s
a
n
d
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
s
m
a
y
b
e
o
f
a
n
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
)
.
Im
p
r
o
v
e
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
3
3
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
A
m
a
j
o
r
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
d
e
v
o
t
e
d
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
i
n
g
ac
t
i
v
i
t
y
i
n
t
h
e
m
a
j
o
r
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
.
M
i
x
e
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ma
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
,
i
f
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
w
e
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
an
d
i
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
L
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
ce
n
t
e
r
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
h
e
l
p
f
o
c
u
s
a
n
d
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
ac
t
i
v
i
t
y
i
n
t
h
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
.
Se
e
P
o
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
9
f
o
r
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
s
e
a
r
e
a
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
B
e
l
o
w
i
s
t
h
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
e
n
t
i
r
e
H
e
a
r
t
of
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
r
e
a
.
S
e
e
P
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
2
-
2
8
a
n
d
2
-
2
9
fo
r
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
i
n
t
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
th
e
C
i
t
y
s
u
b
-
a
r
e
a
s
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
T
a
b
l
e
2
A
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
,
4
0
8
,
0
9
3
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
1
,
4
7
6
,
1
1
5
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
5
1
0
,
5
3
1
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
5
2
1
,
9
8
7
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
2
2
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
-
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
2
6
2
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
5
7
0
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
In
p
a
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
,
t
h
e
So
u
t
h
Va
l
l
c
o
Pa
r
k
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
ar
e
a
s wi
l
l
b
e
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
a
s
a
“r
e
t
a
i
l
b
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
”
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
t
o
S
a
n
t
a
n
a
R
o
w
i
n
Sa
n
J
o
s
e
,
w
i
t
h
a
m
i
x
o
f
o
f
f
i
c
e
,
r
e
t
a
i
l
,
h
o
t
e
l
,
an
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
W
o
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
bi
k
e
l
a
n
e
s
a
n
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
a
t
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
Cr
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
.
I
t
a
l
so
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
a
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
f
o
r
m
a
t
w
i
t
h
re
t
a
i
l
a
n
d
/
o
r
o
f
f
i
c
e
u
s
e
s
.
A
m
a
j
o
r
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
d
e
v
o
t
e
d
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
i
n
g
ac
t
i
v
i
t
y
i
n
t
h
e
m
a
j
o
r
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
.
M
i
x
e
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ma
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
,
i
f
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
w
e
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
an
d
i
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
L
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
ce
n
t
e
r
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
h
e
l
p
f
o
c
u
s
a
n
d
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
ac
t
i
v
i
t
y
i
n
t
h
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
.
Se
e
P
o
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
9
f
o
r
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
s
e
a
r
e
a
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
B
e
l
o
w
i
s
t
h
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
e
n
t
i
r
e
H
e
a
r
t
of
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
r
e
a
.
S
e
e
P
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
2
-
2
8
a
n
d
2
-
2
9
fo
r
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
i
n
t
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
s
u
b
-
a
r
e
a
s
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
T
a
b
l
e
2
A
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
2
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
,
o
r
h
i
g
h
e
r
f
o
r
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
s
,
s
u
b
ar
e
a
s
an
d
n
o
d
e
s
(
s
e
e
b
e
l
o
w
)
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
T
a
b
l
e
2
A
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
,
4
0
8
,
0
9
3
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
a
t
s
t
r
e
e
t
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
In
p
a
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
,
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
Sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
M
a
l
l
s
i
t
e
wi
l
l
b
e
t
r
a
n
s
f
o
r
m
e
d
i
n
t
o
a
n
e
w
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
“
d
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
”
f
o
r
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
I
t
wi
l
l
in
c
l
u
d
e
s a
n
e
w
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
o
f
si
d
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
,
p
a
t
h
w
a
y
s
a
n
d
p
l
a
z
a
s
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
th
e
d
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
f
e
e
l
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
v
i
t
a
l
i
z
e
d
a
r
e
a
.
A
m
a
j
o
r
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
d
e
v
o
t
e
d
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
i
n
g
ac
t
i
v
i
t
y
i
n
t
h
e
m
a
j
o
r
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
.
M
i
x
e
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ma
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
,
if
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
w
e
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
an
d
i
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
L
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
ce
n
t
e
r
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
h
e
l
p
f
o
c
u
s
a
n
d
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
ac
t
i
v
i
t
y
i
n
t
h
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
.
Se
e
P
o
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
9
f
o
r
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
s
e
a
r
e
a
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
B
e
l
o
w
i
s
t
h
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
e
n
t
i
r
e
H
e
a
r
t
of
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
r
e
a
.
S
e
e
P
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
2
-
2
8
a
n
d
2
-
2
9
fo
r
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
i
n
t
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
th
e
C
i
t
y
s
u
b
-
a
r
e
a
s
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
T
a
b
l
e
2
A
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
2
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
,
o
r
h
i
g
h
e
r
f
o
r
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
s
, sub
ar
e
a
s
an
d
n
o
d
e
s
(
s
e
e
b
e
l
o
w
)
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
T
a
b
l
e
2
A
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
,
4
0
8
,
0
9
3
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
1
,
4
7
6
,
1
1
5
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
3
4
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
2
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
,
o
r
3
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
i
n
t
h
e
S
o
u
t
h
V
a
l
l
c
o
Pa
r
k
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
W
e
s
t
a
n
d
E
a
s
t
a
r
e
a
s
.
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
T
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
s
h
a
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
an
d
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
t
o
.
T
h
e
y
pr
o
m
o
t
e
a
c
o
h
e
s
i
v
e
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
st
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
t
h
a
t
l
i
n
k
s
t
h
e
m
a
j
o
r
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
ce
n
t
e
r
s
.
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
fr
o
n
t
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
l
i
n
e
d
e
f
i
n
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
th
e
C
i
t
y
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
.
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
lo
c
a
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
o
r
r
e
a
r
o
f
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s: Se
e
s
u
b
-
a
r
e
a
s
.
45
f
e
e
t
,
e
x
c
e
p
t
a
s
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
n
o
d
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
.
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
a
s
th
e
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
o
l
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
t
o
us
e
f
o
r
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
1
.
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
.
Ev
a
l
u
a
t
e
op
t
i
o
n
s
o
n
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
t
o
im
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
b
y
pr
o
a
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
m
a
n
a
g
i
n
g
s
p
e
e
d
l
i
m
i
t
s
,
t
h
e
i
r
ma
n
u
a
l
a
n
d
a
u
t
o
m
a
t
e
d
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
,
an
d
tr
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
sy
n
c
h
r
o
n
y
s
y
n
c
h
r
o
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
.
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
1
,
4
7
6
,
1
1
5
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
5
1
0
,
5
3
1
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
5
2
1
,
9
8
7
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
2
2
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
-
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
2
6
2
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
5
7
0
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
T
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
s
h
a
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
an
d
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
t
o
.
T
h
e
y
pr
o
m
o
t
e
a
c
o
h
e
s
i
v
e
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
st
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
t
h
a
t
l
i
n
k
s
t
h
e
m
a
j
o
r
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
ce
n
t
e
r
s
.
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
fr
o
n
t
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
l
i
n
e
d
e
f
i
n
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
.
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
to
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
o
r
r
e
a
r
o
f
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s: Se
e
s
u
b
-
a
r
e
a
s
.
45
f
e
e
t
,
or
a
s
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Ce
n
t
e
r
n
o
d
e
, or
h
i
g
h
e
r
f
o
r
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
s
an
d
n
o
d
e
s
(
s
e
e
b
e
l
o
w
)
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
.
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
a
s
th
e
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
o
l
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
t
o
us
e
f
o
r
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
21
.
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
.
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
op
t
i
o
n
s
o
n
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
t
o
im
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
b
y
pr
o
a
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
m
a
n
a
g
i
n
g
s
p
e
e
d
l
i
m
i
t
s
,
t
h
e
i
r
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
5
1
0
,
5
3
1
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
5
2
1
,
9
8
7
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
2
2
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
-
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
2
6
2
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
5
7
0
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
T
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
s
h
a
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
an
d
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
t
o
.
T
h
e
y
pr
o
m
o
t
e
a
c
o
h
e
s
i
v
e
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
st
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
t
h
a
t
l
i
n
k
s
t
h
e
m
a
j
o
r
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
ce
n
t
e
r
s
.
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
fr
o
n
t
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
l
i
n
e
d
e
f
i
n
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
.
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
to
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
o
r
r
e
a
r
o
f
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s: Se
e
s
u
b
-
a
r
e
a
s
.
45
f
e
e
t
,
or
a
s
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
Ce
n
t
e
r
n
o
d
e
,
or
h
i
g
h
e
r
f
o
r
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
s
,
sub
a
r
e
a
s
an
d
n
o
d
e
s
(
s
e
e
b
e
l
o
w
)
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
.
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
a
s
th
e
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
o
l
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
t
o
us
e
f
o
r
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
21
.
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
.
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
op
t
i
o
n
s
o
n
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
t
o
im
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
b
y
pr
o
a
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
m
a
n
a
g
i
n
g
s
p
e
e
d
l
i
m
i
t
s
,
t
h
e
i
r
ma
n
u
a
l
a
n
d
a
u
t
o
m
a
t
e
d
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
,
and
tr
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
sy
n
c
h
r
o
n
y
s
y
n
c
h
r
o
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
3
5
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
ma
n
u
a
l
a
n
d
a
u
t
o
m
a
t
e
d
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
,
a
n
d
tr
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
sy
n
c
h
r
o
n
y
s
y
n
c
h
r
o
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
37
2
6
.
A
:
D
e
A
n
z
a
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
N
o
d
e
Su
p
p
o
r
t
D
e
A
n
z
a
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
i
n
i
t
s
r
o
l
e
a
s
a
va
l
u
a
b
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
a
n
d
s
e
e
k
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
fu
t
u
r
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
o
th
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
S
m
a
l
l
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
ac
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
a
r
e
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
i
n
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
r
a
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
c
o
l
l
e
g
e
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
Al
l
o
w
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
n
o
t
t
r
a
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
y
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
pa
r
t
o
f
a
c
o
l
l
e
g
e
t
o
b
e
b
u
i
l
t
a
t
D
e
A
n
z
a
Co
l
l
e
g
e
.
S
u
c
h
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
in
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
t
h
e
c
a
m
p
u
s
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
,
pr
o
v
i
d
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
n
o
t
o
f
f
e
r
e
d
i
n
th
e
c
i
t
y
o
r
a
l
l
e
v
i
a
t
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
c
r
e
a
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
co
l
l
e
g
e
.
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
mi
n
i
m
i
z
e
v
i
s
u
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
n
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
.
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
ac
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
st
r
e
e
t
f
r
o
n
t
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
ar
e
a
.
C
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
p
a
t
t
e
r
n
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
to
d
i
r
e
c
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
w
a
y
f
r
o
m
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
6
.
B
:
Oa
k
s
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
Cr
e
a
t
e
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
e
,
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
a
t
o
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
l
o
n
g
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
h
a
l
l
h
a
v
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
wi
t
h
s
t
o
r
e
f
r
o
n
t
s
o
n
t
h
e
g
r
o
u
n
d
l
e
v
e
l
.
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
m
a
y
b
e
al
l
o
w
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
s
e
c
o
n
d
o
r
h
i
g
h
e
r
l
e
v
e
l
s
.
Gr
o
u
n
d
l
e
v
e
l
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
a
m
i
x
e
d
us
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
m
a
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
M
a
r
y
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
6
.
B
:
Oa
k
s
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
Cr
e
a
t
e
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
e
,
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
a
t
o
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
l
o
n
g
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
h
a
l
l
h
a
v
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
us
e
s
w
i
t
h
s
t
o
r
e
f
r
o
n
t
s
o
n
t
h
e
g
r
o
u
n
d
l
e
v
e
l
.
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
m
a
y
be
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
s
e
c
o
n
d
o
r
h
i
g
h
e
r
le
v
e
l
s
.
Gr
o
u
n
d
l
e
v
e
l
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
a
m
i
x
e
d
us
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
m
a
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
6
.
B
:
Oa
k
s
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
Cr
e
a
t
e
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
e
,
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
a
t
o
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
i
m
a
r
y
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
al
o
n
g
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
h
a
l
l
h
a
v
e
re
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
w
i
t
h
s
t
o
r
e
f
r
o
n
t
s
o
n
t
h
e
g
r
o
u
n
d
le
v
e
l
.
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
us
e
s
m
a
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
s
e
c
o
n
d
o
r
hi
g
h
e
r
le
v
e
l
s
.
G
r
o
u
n
d
l
e
v
e
l
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
a
s
pa
r
t
o
f
a
m
i
x
e
d
u
s
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
m
a
y
b
e
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
3
6
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Av
e
n
u
e
i
f
f
r
o
n
t
p
o
r
c
h
e
s
a
n
d
s
t
o
o
p
s
a
r
e
in
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
o
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
2
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
-
f
l
o
o
r
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
f
a
c
e
m
a
j
o
r
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
T
h
e
st
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
s
h
a
l
l
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
o
f
w
i
d
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
v
i
t
i
n
g
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
,
st
r
e
e
t
t
r
e
e
s
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
s
c
a
l
e
d
l
i
g
h
t
s
w
i
t
h
ba
n
n
e
r
s
,
s
m
a
l
l
p
l
a
z
a
s
,
a
r
t
/
w
a
t
e
r
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
,
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
r
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
p
a
v
i
n
g
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
:
4
5
f
e
e
t
Ma
r
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
i
f
f
r
o
n
t
p
o
r
c
h
e
s
a
n
d
s
t
o
o
p
s
a
r
e
in
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
o
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
3
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
-
f
l
o
o
r
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
f
a
c
e
m
a
j
o
r
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
T
h
e
st
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
s
h
a
l
l
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
o
f
w
i
d
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
v
i
t
i
n
g
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
,
s
t
r
e
e
t
tr
e
e
s
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
s
c
a
l
e
d
l
i
g
h
t
s
w
i
t
h
b
a
n
n
e
r
s
,
sm
a
l
l
p
l
a
z
a
s
,
a
r
t
/
w
a
t
e
r
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
cr
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
p
a
v
i
n
g
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
:
45
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
Wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
:
up
t
o
6
0
f
e
e
t
al
l
o
w
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
M
a
r
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
i
f
f
r
o
n
t
p
o
r
c
h
e
s
an
d
s
t
o
o
p
s
a
r
e
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
o
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
3
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
-
f
l
o
o
r
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
f
a
c
e
m
a
j
o
r
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
T
h
e
st
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
s
h
a
l
l
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
o
f
w
i
d
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
v
i
t
i
n
g
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
,
st
r
e
e
t
t
r
e
e
s
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
s
c
a
l
e
d
l
i
g
h
t
s
w
i
t
h
ba
n
n
e
r
s
,
s
m
a
l
l
p
l
a
z
a
s
,
a
r
t
/
w
a
t
e
r
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
,
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
r
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
p
a
v
i
n
g
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
:
60
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
Wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
:
up
t
o
7
5
f
e
e
t
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
6
C
:
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
N
o
d
e
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
Me
m
o
r
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
,
t
h
e
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
,
t
h
e
S
p
o
r
t
s
Ce
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
t
h
e
Q
u
i
n
l
a
n
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
,
a
s
va
l
u
a
b
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
a
n
d
a
s
s
e
t
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing CC Direction
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
26
.
D
2
8
:
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
Cr
e
a
t
e
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
e
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
wi
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
al
o
n
g
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
D
e
An
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
,
w
h
e
r
e
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
al
o
n
g
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
h
a
l
l
h
a
v
e
re
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
w
i
t
h
s
t
o
r
e
f
r
o
n
t
s
o
n
t
h
e
g
r
o
u
n
d
le
v
e
l
.
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
o
f
f
i
c
e
u
s
e
s
m
a
y
b
e
al
l
o
w
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
s
e
c
o
n
d
l
e
v
e
l
.
L
i
m
i
t
e
d
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
26
.
D
28
:
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
Cr
e
a
t
e
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
e
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
wi
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
al
o
n
g
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
D
e
An
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
,
w
h
e
r
e
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
l
o
n
g
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
h
a
l
l
h
a
v
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
us
e
s
w
i
t
h
s
t
o
r
e
f
r
o
n
t
s
o
n
t
h
e
g
r
o
u
n
d
l
e
v
e
l
.
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
o
f
f
i
c
e
u
s
e
s
m
a
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
o
n
th
e
s
e
c
o
n
d
l
e
v
e
l
.
L
i
m
i
t
e
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
ar
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
26
.
D
28
:
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
Cr
e
a
t
e
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
e
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
wi
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
al
o
n
g
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
D
e
An
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
,
w
h
e
r
e
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
al
o
n
g
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
h
a
l
l
h
a
v
e
re
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
w
i
t
h
s
t
o
r
e
f
r
o
n
t
s
o
n
t
h
e
g
r
o
u
n
d
le
v
e
l
.
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
o
f
f
i
c
e
u
s
e
s
m
a
y
b
e
al
l
o
w
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
s
e
c
o
n
d
l
e
v
e
l
.
L
i
m
i
t
e
d
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
.
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
3
7
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
b
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
U
p
t
o
2
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
2
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
-
f
l
o
o
r
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
f
a
c
e
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
T
h
e
st
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
s
h
a
l
l
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
o
f
w
i
d
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
v
i
t
i
n
g
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
,
st
r
e
e
t
t
r
e
e
s
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
s
c
a
l
e
d
l
i
g
h
t
s
w
i
t
h
ba
n
n
e
r
s
,
s
m
a
l
l
p
l
a
z
a
s
,
a
r
t
/
w
a
t
e
r
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
,
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
r
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
p
a
v
i
n
g
,
an
d
o
t
h
e
r
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
Cr
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
P
l
a
n
.
D
e
s
i
g
n
s
sh
o
u
l
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
e
n
t
r
y
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
a
t
t
h
e
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
Ro
a
d
/
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
D
e
An
z
a
/
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
to
m
a
r
k
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
a
r
e
a
.
A
l
a
n
d
m
a
r
k
fe
a
t
u
r
e
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
a
t
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
Pa
r
k
a
t
t
h
e
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
a
n
d
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
m
a
r
k
t
h
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
o
f
th
e
c
i
t
y
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s:
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
o
f
45
fe
e
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
Pl
a
n
.
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
a
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
p
l
a
n
f
o
r
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
Cr
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
,
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
ob
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
o
f
c
r
e
a
t
i
n
g
a
u
n
i
q
u
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
an
d
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
.
T
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
a
r
e
a
pr
e
s
e
n
t
s
a
u
n
i
q
u
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
ac
t
i
v
i
t
y
c
e
n
t
e
r
,
w
h
i
c
h
w
i
l
l
b
e
a
p
o
s
i
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
me
m
o
r
a
b
l
e
g
a
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
p
l
a
c
e
f
o
r
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
ci
t
i
z
e
n
s
a
n
d
v
i
s
i
t
o
r
s
.
T
h
e
p
l
a
n
s
h
a
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
b
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
U
p
t
o
2
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
25
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
35
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
i
n
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
Cr
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
N
o
d
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
M
a
p
o
f
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
Pl
a
n
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
-
f
l
o
o
r
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
f
a
c
e
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
T
h
e
st
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
s
h
a
l
l
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
o
f
w
i
d
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
v
i
t
i
n
g
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
,
s
t
r
e
e
t
tr
e
e
s
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
s
c
a
l
e
d
l
i
g
h
t
s
w
i
t
h
b
a
n
n
e
r
s
,
sm
a
l
l
p
l
a
z
a
s
,
a
r
t
/
w
a
t
e
r
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
cr
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
p
a
v
i
n
g
,
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
el
e
m
e
n
t
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
St
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
P
l
a
n
.
D
e
s
i
g
n
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
en
t
r
y
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
a
t
t
h
e
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
/
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
Cr
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
D
e
A
n
z
a
/
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
Cr
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
m
a
r
k
t
h
e
Cr
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
a
r
e
a
.
A
l
a
n
d
m
a
r
k
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
h
a
l
l
be
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
a
t
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
P
a
r
k
a
t
t
h
e
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
a
n
d
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
m
a
r
k
t
h
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s:
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
o
f
45
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
Wi
t
h
a
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
:
up
t
o
6
0
fe
e
t
i
n
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
N
o
d
e
id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
M
a
p
of
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
Pl
a
n
.
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
a
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
p
l
a
n
f
o
r
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
Cr
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
,
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
b
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
U
p
t
o
2
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
25
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
40
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
i
n
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
Cr
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
N
o
d
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
M
a
p
o
f
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
Pl
a
n
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
P
r
i
m
a
r
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
-
f
l
o
o
r
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
f
a
c
e
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
T
h
e
st
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
s
h
a
l
l
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
o
f
w
i
d
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
v
i
t
i
n
g
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
,
st
r
e
e
t
t
r
e
e
s
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
s
c
a
l
e
d
l
i
g
h
t
s
w
i
t
h
ba
n
n
e
r
s
,
s
m
a
l
l
p
l
a
z
a
s
,
a
r
t
/
w
a
t
e
r
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
,
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
r
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
s
w
i
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
p
a
v
i
n
g
,
an
d
o
t
h
e
r
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
Cr
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
P
l
a
n
.
D
e
s
i
g
n
s
sh
o
u
l
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
e
n
t
r
y
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
a
t
t
h
e
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
Ro
a
d
/
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
D
e
An
z
a
/
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
to
m
a
r
k
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
a
r
e
a
.
A
l
a
n
d
m
a
r
k
fe
a
t
u
r
e
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
a
t
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
Pa
r
k
a
t
t
h
e
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
a
n
d
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
m
a
r
k
t
h
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
o
f
th
e
c
i
t
y
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s:
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
o
f
45
fe
e
t
,
60
fe
e
t
i
n
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
No
d
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
Ma
p
o
f
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
,
o
r
Wi
t
h
a
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
:
up
t
o
7
5
fe
e
t
i
n
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
N
o
d
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
3
8
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
•
A
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
p
l
a
n
s
p
e
c
i
f
y
i
n
g
t
h
e
t
y
p
e
,
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
a
n
d
a
r
r
a
n
g
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
to
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
ac
t
i
v
i
t
y
.
•
A
d
e
s
i
g
n
p
l
a
n
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
f
o
r
a
n
at
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
.
Th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
p
l
a
n
s
h
a
l
l
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
th
a
t
f
o
s
t
e
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
a
n
d
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
se
n
s
e
o
f
a
r
r
i
v
a
l
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
S
h
a
r
e
d
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
h
a
r
e
d
pa
r
k
i
n
g
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
,
wi
t
h
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
t
o
re
f
l
e
c
t
s
h
a
r
e
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
I
n
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
l
o
t
s
,
pa
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
r
a
n
g
e
m
e
n
t
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
th
e
s
u
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
;
ho
w
e
v
e
r
,
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
t
o
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
o
r
r
e
a
r
o
f
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
i
s
d
e
s
i
r
a
b
l
e
.
N
o
v
i
s
i
b
l
e
g
a
r
a
g
e
s
sh
a
l
l
b
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
.
A
b
o
v
e
g
r
a
d
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
no
t
b
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
a
n
d
sh
a
l
l
b
e
l
i
n
e
d
w
i
t
h
a
c
t
i
v
e
u
s
e
s
o
n
t
h
e
gr
o
u
n
d
f
l
o
o
r
.
S
u
b
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
/
d
e
c
k
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
i
s
al
l
o
w
e
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
i
t
i
s
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
l
y
s
c
r
e
e
n
e
d
fr
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
o
r
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
-
o
f
f
i
c
e
U
s
e
s
.
A
l
l
o
w
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
-
o
f
f
i
c
e
u
s
e
s
a
b
o
v
e
g
r
o
u
n
d
l
e
v
e
l
re
t
a
i
l
t
o
b
e
d
r
a
w
n
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4
.
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
/
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
L
a
n
d
m
a
r
k
.
S
e
c
u
r
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
ea
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
r
o
m
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
t
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
of
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
ob
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
o
f
c
r
e
a
t
i
n
g
a
u
n
i
q
u
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
an
d
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
.
T
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
a
r
e
a
pr
e
s
e
n
t
s
a
u
n
i
q
u
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
ac
t
i
v
i
t
y
c
e
n
t
e
r
,
w
h
i
c
h
w
i
l
l
b
e
a
p
o
s
i
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
me
m
o
r
a
b
l
e
g
a
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
p
l
a
c
e
f
o
r
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
ci
t
i
z
e
n
s
a
n
d
v
i
s
i
t
o
r
s
.
T
h
e
p
l
a
n
s
h
a
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
•
A
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
p
l
a
n
s
p
e
c
i
f
y
i
n
g
t
h
e
t
y
p
e
,
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
a
n
d
a
r
r
a
n
g
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
to
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
ac
t
i
v
i
t
y
.
•
A
d
e
s
i
g
n
p
l
a
n
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
f
o
r
a
n
at
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
.
Th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
p
l
a
n
s
h
a
l
l
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
th
a
t
f
o
s
t
e
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
a
n
d
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
se
n
s
e
o
f
a
r
r
i
v
a
l
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
S
h
a
r
e
d
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
h
a
r
e
d
pa
r
k
i
n
g
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
,
wi
t
h
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
t
o
re
f
l
e
c
t
s
h
a
r
e
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
I
n
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
l
o
t
s
,
pa
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
r
a
n
g
e
m
e
n
t
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
th
e
s
u
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
;
ho
w
e
v
e
r
,
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
t
o
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
o
r
r
e
a
r
o
f
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
i
s
d
e
s
i
r
a
b
l
e
.
N
o
v
i
s
i
b
l
e
g
a
r
a
g
e
s
sh
a
l
l
b
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
.
A
b
o
v
e
g
r
a
d
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
n
o
t
be
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
be
l
i
n
e
d
w
i
t
h
a
c
t
i
v
e
u
s
e
s
o
n
t
h
e
g
r
o
u
n
d
fl
o
o
r
.
S
u
b
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
/
d
e
c
k
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
i
s
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
i
t
i
s
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
l
y
s
c
r
e
e
n
e
d
f
r
o
m
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
o
r
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
-
o
f
f
i
c
e
U
s
e
s
.
Al
l
o
w
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
-
o
f
f
i
c
e
u
s
e
s
a
b
o
v
e
g
r
o
u
n
d
l
e
v
e
l
re
t
a
i
l
t
o
b
e
d
r
a
w
n
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
Pl
a
n
.
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
a
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
p
l
a
n
f
o
r
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
Cr
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
,
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
ob
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
o
f
c
r
e
a
t
i
n
g
a
u
n
i
q
u
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
an
d
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
.
T
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
a
r
e
a
pr
e
s
e
n
t
s
a
u
n
i
q
u
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
ac
t
i
v
i
t
y
c
e
n
t
e
r
,
w
h
i
c
h
w
i
l
l
b
e
a
p
o
s
i
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
me
m
o
r
a
b
l
e
g
a
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
p
l
a
c
e
f
o
r
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
ci
t
i
z
e
n
s
a
n
d
v
i
s
i
t
o
r
s
.
T
h
e
p
l
a
n
s
h
a
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
•
A
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
p
l
a
n
s
p
e
c
i
f
y
i
n
g
t
h
e
t
y
p
e
,
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
a
n
d
a
r
r
a
n
g
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
to
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
ac
t
i
v
i
t
y
.
•
A
d
e
s
i
g
n
p
l
a
n
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
f
o
r
a
n
at
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
.
Th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
p
l
a
n
s
h
a
l
l
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
th
a
t
f
o
s
t
e
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
a
n
d
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
se
n
s
e
o
f
a
r
r
i
v
a
l
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
S
h
a
r
e
d
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
h
a
r
e
d
pa
r
k
i
n
g
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
,
wi
t
h
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
t
o
re
f
l
e
c
t
s
h
a
r
e
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
I
n
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
l
o
t
s
,
pa
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
r
a
n
g
e
m
e
n
t
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
th
e
s
u
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
;
ho
w
e
v
e
r
,
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
t
o
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
o
r
r
e
a
r
o
f
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
i
s
d
e
s
i
r
a
b
l
e
.
N
o
v
i
s
i
b
l
e
g
a
r
a
g
e
s
sh
a
l
l
b
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
.
A
b
o
v
e
g
r
a
d
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
no
t
b
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
a
n
d
sh
a
l
l
b
e
l
i
n
e
d
w
i
t
h
a
c
t
i
v
e
u
s
e
s
o
n
t
h
e
gr
o
u
n
d
f
l
o
o
r
.
S
u
b
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
/
d
e
c
k
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
i
s
al
l
o
w
e
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
i
t
i
s
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
l
y
s
c
r
e
e
n
e
d
fr
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
o
r
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
-
o
f
f
i
c
e
U
s
e
s
.
Allow
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
3
9
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Cr
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
fu
t
u
r
e
l
a
n
d
m
a
r
k
,
w
h
i
c
h
m
a
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
d
e
s
i
g
n
el
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
t
h
e
c
o
r
n
e
r
s
.
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
a
p
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
a
s
a
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
of
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
t
a
l
l
f
o
u
r
c
o
r
n
e
r
s
o
f
th
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
of
a
f
u
t
u
r
e
l
a
n
d
m
a
r
k
,
e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
so
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
/
D
e
An
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
L
a
n
d
a
t
t
h
e
so
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
w
i
l
l
b
e
a
n
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
ar
e
a
a
n
d
g
a
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
p
l
a
c
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4
.
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
/
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
L
a
n
d
m
a
r
k
.
S
e
c
u
r
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
ea
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
r
o
m
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
t
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
of
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
Cr
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
fu
t
u
r
e
l
a
n
d
m
a
r
k
,
w
h
i
c
h
m
a
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
d
e
s
i
g
n
el
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
t
h
e
c
o
r
n
e
r
s
.
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
a
p
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
a
s
a
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
of
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
t
a
l
l
f
o
u
r
c
o
r
n
e
r
s
o
f
th
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
of
a
f
u
t
u
r
e
l
a
n
d
m
a
r
k
,
e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
so
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
/
D
e
An
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
L
a
n
d
a
t
t
h
e
so
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
w
i
l
l
b
e
a
n
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
ar
e
a
a
n
d
g
a
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
p
l
a
c
e
.
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
-
o
f
f
i
c
e
u
s
e
s
a
b
o
v
e
g
r
o
u
n
d
l
e
v
e
l
re
t
a
i
l
t
o
b
e
d
r
a
w
n
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
al
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4
.
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
/
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
L
a
n
d
m
a
r
k
.
S
e
c
u
r
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
ea
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
r
o
m
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
t
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
of
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
Cr
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
fu
t
u
r
e
l
a
n
d
m
a
r
k
,
w
h
i
c
h
m
a
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
d
e
s
i
g
n
el
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
t
h
e
c
o
r
n
e
r
s
.
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
a
p
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
a
s
a
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
of
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
t
a
l
l
f
o
u
r
c
o
r
n
e
r
s
o
f
th
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
of
a
f
u
t
u
r
e
l
a
n
d
m
a
r
k
,
e
x
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
so
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
/
D
e
An
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
L
a
n
d
a
t
t
h
e
so
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
w
i
l
l
b
e
a
n
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
ar
e
a
a
n
d
g
a
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
p
l
a
c
e
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2-
2
6
.
E
3
4
:
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
No
d
e
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
N
o
d
e
a
s
a
mo
d
e
r
a
t
e
-
s
c
a
l
e
,
m
e
d
i
u
m
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
,
m
i
x
e
d
u
s
e
em
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
t
h
a
t
w
i
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
a
n
d
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
su
p
p
o
r
t
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Of
f
i
c
e
,
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
,
ho
t
e
l
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
st
o
r
e
s
,
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
an
d
mi
x
e
d
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
us
e
s
.
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
o
f
va
r
i
e
d
f
o
r
m
a
n
d
h
e
i
g
h
t
.
A
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
a
r
k
i
s
lo
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
Cr
e
e
k
a
n
d
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
,
c
o
m
b
i
n
i
n
g
op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
r
t
a
n
d
re
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
f
r
o
n
t
t
h
e
p
l
a
z
a
.
I
t
w
i
l
l
co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
s
e
r
v
e
a
s
a
f
o
c
a
l
p
o
i
n
t
f
o
r
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
26
.
E
34
:
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
N
o
d
e
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
N
o
d
e
a
s
a
mo
d
e
r
a
t
e
-
s
c
a
l
e
,
m
e
d
i
u
m
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
,
m
i
x
e
d
u
s
e
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
th
a
t
w
i
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
a
n
d
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
su
p
p
o
r
t
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Of
f
i
c
e
,
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
,
ho
t
e
l
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
, st
o
r
e
s
,
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
an
d
mi
x
e
d
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
us
e
s
.
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
o
f
va
r
i
e
d
f
o
r
m
a
n
d
h
e
i
g
h
t
.
A
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
a
r
k
i
s
lo
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
Cr
e
e
k
a
n
d
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
,
c
o
m
b
i
n
i
n
g
op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
r
t
a
n
d
re
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
f
r
o
n
t
t
h
e
p
l
a
z
a
.
I
t
w
i
l
l
co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
s
e
r
v
e
a
s
a
f
o
c
a
l
p
o
i
n
t
f
o
r
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
26
.
E
34
:
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
N
o
d
e
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
N
o
d
e
as a
mo
d
e
r
a
t
e
-
s
c
a
l
e
,
m
e
d
i
u
m
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
,
m
i
x
e
d
u
s
e
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
th
a
t
w
i
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
a
n
d
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
su
p
p
o
r
t
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Of
f
i
c
e
,
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
,
ho
t
e
l
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
s
t
o
r
e
s
,
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
an
d
mi
x
e
d
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
us
e
s
.
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
o
f
va
r
i
e
d
f
o
r
m
a
n
d
h
e
i
g
h
t
.
A
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
a
r
k
i
s
lo
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
Cr
e
e
k
a
n
d
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
,
c
o
m
b
i
n
i
n
g
op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
r
t
a
n
d
re
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
f
r
o
n
t
t
h
e
p
l
a
z
a
.
I
t
w
i
l
l
co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
s
e
r
v
e
a
s
a
f
o
c
a
l
p
o
i
n
t
f
o
r
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
4
0
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
ar
e
a
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
M
i
x
e
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ma
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
,
i
f
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
w
e
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
an
d
i
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
T
a
b
l
e
2
A
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
6
4
,
1
4
4
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
7
9
,
0
1
1
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
,
0
5
0
,
2
2
7
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
1
,
0
5
0
,
2
2
7
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
2
2
4
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
2
2
4
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
5
5
6
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
6
5
6
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
2
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
In
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
a
n
d
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
i
n
th
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
ar
e
a
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
M
i
x
e
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ma
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
,
i
f
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
w
e
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
an
d
i
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
2
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
T
a
b
l
e
2
A
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
6
4
,
1
4
4
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
7
9
,
0
1
1
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
,
0
5
0
,
2
2
7
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
1
,
0
5
0
,
2
2
7
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
2
2
4
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
2
2
4
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
5
5
6
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
6
5
6
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
2
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
ar
e
a
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
M
i
x
e
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ma
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
,
i
f
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
w
e
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
an
d
i
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
2
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
T
a
b
l
e
2
A
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
6
4
,
1
4
4
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
7
9
,
0
1
1
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
,
0
5
0
,
2
2
7
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
1
,
0
5
0
,
2
2
7
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
2
2
4
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
2
2
4
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
5
5
6
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
6
5
6
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
2
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
4
1
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
,
s
i
t
e
p
l
a
n
a
n
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
Fo
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
e
x
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
l
y
o
n
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
He
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
L
a
n
d
s
cap
e
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
a
r
e
n
o
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
o
f
va
r
i
e
d
f
o
r
m
a
n
d
h
e
i
g
h
t
.
A
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
a
r
k
i
s
lo
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
Cr
e
e
k
a
n
d
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
,
c
o
m
b
i
n
i
n
g
op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
r
t
a
n
d
re
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
f
r
o
n
t
t
h
e
p
l
a
z
a
.
I
t
w
i
l
l
s
e
r
v
e
as
a
f
o
c
a
l
p
o
i
n
t
f
o
r
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
a
n
d
wi
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
Cr
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
a
r
e
a
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s: Ma
x
i
m
u
m
he
i
g
h
t
o
f
45
f
e
e
t
o
r
Ex
c
e
p
t
as
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
w
i
t
h
p
a
s
t
en
t
i
t
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
He
i
g
h
t
e
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
s
h
a
v
e
be
e
n
g
r
a
n
t
e
d
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
h
i
g
h
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
no
d
e
i
n
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
.
N
o
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
e
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
s
sh
a
l
l
b
e
g
r
a
n
t
e
d
.
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
In
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
a
n
d
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
i
n
th
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
,
s
i
t
e
p
l
a
n
a
n
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
Fo
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
e
x
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
l
y
o
n
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
He
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
L
a
n
d
s
cap
e
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
a
r
e
n
o
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
o
f
va
r
i
e
d
f
o
r
m
a
n
d
h
e
i
g
h
t
.
A
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
a
r
k
i
s
lo
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
Cr
e
e
k
a
n
d
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
,
c
o
m
b
i
n
i
n
g
op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
r
t
a
n
d
re
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
f
r
o
n
t
t
h
e
p
l
a
z
a
.
I
t
w
i
l
l
s
e
r
v
e
a
s
a
f
o
c
a
l
p
o
i
n
t
f
o
r
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
in
c
l
u
d
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
Cr
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
a
r
e
a
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s: Ma
x
i
m
u
m
he
i
g
h
t
o
f
45
6
0
fe
e
t
,
o
r
Wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
:
u
p
t
o
7
5
f
e
e
t
o
r
Wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
be
n
e
f
i
t
s
:
up
t
o
9
0
f
e
e
t
wi
t
h
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
be
n
e
f
i
t
s
or
Ae
x
c
e
p
t
a
s
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
w
i
t
h
pa
s
t
en
t
i
t
l
m
e
n
t
s
e
n
t
i
t
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
He
i
g
h
t
ex
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
s
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
g
r
a
n
t
e
d
t
o
cr
e
a
t
e
a
h
i
g
h
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
n
o
d
e
i
n
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
.
No
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
e
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
g
r
a
n
t
e
d
.
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
In
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
a
n
d
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
i
n
th
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
,
s
i
t
e
p
l
a
n
a
n
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
Fo
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
e
x
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
l
y
o
n
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
He
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
L
a
n
d
s
cap
e
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
a
r
e
n
o
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
o
f
va
r
i
e
d
f
o
r
m
a
n
d
h
e
i
g
h
t
.
A
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
a
r
k
i
s
lo
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
Cr
e
e
k
a
n
d
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
,
c
o
m
b
i
n
i
n
g
op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
r
t
a
n
d
re
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
f
r
o
n
t
t
h
e
p
l
a
z
a
.
I
t
w
i
l
l
s
e
r
v
e
as
a
f
o
c
a
l
p
o
i
n
t
f
o
r
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
i
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
a
n
d
wi
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
Cr
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
a
r
e
a
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s:
75
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
Wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
:
u
p
t
o
9
0
f
e
e
t
o
r
Wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
be
n
e
f
i
t
s
:
u
p
t
o
1
1
0
f
e
e
t
o
r
Ex
c
e
p
t
a
s
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
w
i
t
h
p
a
s
t
en
t
i
t
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
e
n
t
i
t
l
m
e
n
t
s
H
e
i
g
h
t
ex
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
s
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
g
r
a
n
t
e
d
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
h
i
g
h
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
n
o
d
e
i
n
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
.
N
o
fu
r
t
h
e
r
e
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
g
r
a
n
t
e
d
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
6
.
F:
Ci
v
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
N
o
d
e
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
C
i
v
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
N
o
d
e
as
a
v
i
b
r
a
n
t
,
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
g
a
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
p
l
a
c
e
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
of
f
i
c
e
,
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
s
o
m
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
In
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
a
n
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
de
s
i
g
n
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
th
e
C
i
t
y
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
,
s
i
t
e
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
6
.
F:
Ci
v
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
N
o
d
e
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
C
i
v
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
N
o
d
e
as
a
v
i
b
r
a
n
t
,
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
g
a
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
p
l
a
c
e
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
,
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
s
o
m
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
In
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
a
n
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
de
s
i
g
n
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
,
s
i
t
e
p
l
a
n
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
6
.
F:
Ci
v
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
N
o
d
e
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
C
i
v
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
N
o
d
e
as
a
v
i
b
r
a
n
t
,
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
g
a
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
p
l
a
c
e
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
of
f
i
c
e
,
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
s
o
m
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
I
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
a
n
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
de
s
i
g
n
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
,
s
i
t
e
p
l
a
n
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
4
2
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
pl
a
n
a
n
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
F
o
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
wi
t
h
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
e
x
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
l
y
o
n
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
L
a
n
d
s
a
p
e
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
a
r
e
n
o
t
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
:
45
f
e
e
t
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
Ci
v
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
.
Ex
p
l
o
r
e
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
in
g
t
h
e
C
i
v
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
Pl
a
z
a
,
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
a
n
d
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
Of
f
i
c
e
P
a
r
k
.
M
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
th
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
o
f
f
i
c
e
p
a
r
k
o
n
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
To
r
r
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
.
an
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
F
o
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
e
x
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
l
y
o
n
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
La
n
d
s
a
p
e
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
a
r
e
n
o
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
:
45
f
e
e
t
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
C
i
v
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
.
Ex
p
l
o
r
e
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
in
g
t
h
e
C
i
v
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
Pl
a
z
a
,
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
a
n
d
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
O
f
f
i
c
e
P
a
r
k
.
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
th
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
o
f
f
i
c
e
p
a
r
k
o
n
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
To
r
r
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
.
an
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
F
o
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
e
x
c
l
u
s
i
v
e
l
y
o
n
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
La
n
d
s
a
p
e
S
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
a
r
e
n
o
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
:
45
f
e
e
t
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
C
i
v
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
.
Explore
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
in
g
t
h
e
C
i
v
i
c
C
e
n
t
e
r
Pl
a
z
a
,
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
a
n
d
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
O
f
f
i
c
e
P
a
r
k
.
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
th
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
o
f
f
i
c
e
p
a
r
k
o
n
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
To
r
r
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
26
.
G
3
0
:
So
u
t
h
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
Re
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
So
u
t
h
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
as
a
l
a
r
g
e
-
s
c
a
l
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
ar
e
a
t
h
a
t
i
s
a
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
ho
t
e
l
)
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
e
n
t
e
r
t
a
i
n
m
e
n
t
c
e
n
t
e
r
w
i
t
h
su
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
.
Con
t
i
n
u
e
t
h
e
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
,
w
h
i
c
h
w
a
s
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
R
o
s
e
b
o
w
l
mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
e
n
t
i
r
e
Pa
r
k
w
a
y
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
A
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
m
a
l
l
a
n
d
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
m
a
i
n
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
o
f
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
.
Ho
t
e
l
s
a
r
e
a
l
s
o
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
So
u
t
h
Va
l
l
c
o
Pa
r
k
a
r
e
a
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
.
D
a
y
t
i
m
e
a
n
d
n
i
g
h
t
t
i
m
e
re
g
i
o
n
a
l
e
n
t
e
r
t
a
i
n
m
e
n
t
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
a
th
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
mo
v
i
e
t
h
e
a
t
r
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
x
,
a
r
e
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
26
.
G
30
:
So
u
t
h
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
So
u
t
h
Re
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
So
u
t
h
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
as
a
l
a
r
g
e
-
s
c
a
l
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
ar
e
a
t
h
a
t
i
s
a
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
ho
t
e
l
)
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
e
n
t
e
r
t
a
i
n
m
e
n
t
c
e
n
t
e
r
w
i
t
h
su
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
. V
a
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
h
e
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
,
w
h
i
c
h
w
a
s
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
R
o
s
e
b
o
w
l
mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
e
n
t
i
r
e
Pa
r
k
w
a
y
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
It
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
th
a
t
m
a
j
o
r
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
Va
l
l
c
o
S
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
(
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
an
c
h
o
r
s
t
o
r
e
s
)
w
i
l
l
o
c
c
u
r
.
RA
r
eg
i
o
n
a
l
sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
,
h
o
t
e
l
,
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
m
a
l
l
a
n
d
of
f
i
c
e
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
26
.
G
30
:
So
u
t
h
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
So
u
t
h
Re
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
So
u
t
h
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
as
a
l
a
r
g
e
-
s
c
a
l
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
ar
e
a
t
h
a
t
i
s
a
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
ho
t
e
l
)
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
e
n
t
e
r
t
a
i
n
m
e
n
t
c
e
n
t
e
r
w
i
t
h
su
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
h
e
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
,
w
h
i
c
h
w
a
s
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
R
o
s
e
b
o
w
l
mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
e
n
t
i
r
e
Pa
r
k
w
a
y
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
It
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
th
a
t
m
a
j
o
r
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
Va
l
l
c
o
S
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
(
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
an
c
h
o
r
s
t
o
r
e
s
)
w
i
l
l
o
c
c
u
r
.
RA
r
eg
i
o
n
a
l
sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
,
h
o
t
e
l
,
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
m
a
l
l
a
n
d
office
an
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
t
h
e
m
a
i
n
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
4
3
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
hi
g
h
l
y
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
m
a
l
l
a
r
e
a
.
As
p
a
r
t
of
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
a
l
s
o
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
.
Th
e
p
r
e
c
i
s
e
mi
x
o
f
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
v
i
a
a
ma
s
t
e
r
p
l
a
n
a
n
d
a
n
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
u
s
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
.
Th
e
C
i
t
y
h
a
s
f
o
r
m
e
d
a
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
pr
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
e
n
c
o
m
p
a
s
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
ma
l
l
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
T
h
e
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
al
l
o
w
s
f
o
r
m
o
s
t
o
f
t
h
e
f
u
n
d
s
d
e
r
i
v
e
d
f
r
o
m
th
e
“
t
a
x
i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
”
t
o
g
o
t
o
t
h
e
re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
.
“
T
a
x
i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
”
r
e
f
e
r
s
to
t
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
t
a
x
v
a
l
u
e
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
a
b
o
v
e
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
t
a
x
v
a
l
u
e
a
t
t
h
e
ti
m
e
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
.
Th
e
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
m
a
l
l
s
i
t
e
h
a
s
a
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
a
n
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
5
3
5
,
0
0
0
s
q
.
f
t
.
o
f
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
ab
o
v
e
t
h
e
1
,
1
1
0
,
7
0
0
s
q
.
f
t
.
o
f
s
p
a
c
e
,
w
h
i
c
h
ex
i
s
t
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
1
,
1
9
9
1
.
T
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
e
x
p
i
r
e
s
i
n
2
0
0
6
.
T
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
c
a
n
b
e
us
e
d
a
s
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
,
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
a
n
d
/
o
r
h
o
t
e
l
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
p
a
c
e
.
T
h
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
i
e
s
m
a
n
y
o
f
t
h
e
ma
l
l
’
s
f
u
t
u
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
re
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
i
n
e
f
f
e
c
t
a
t
t
h
e
t
i
m
e
of
i
t
s
a
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
M
i
x
e
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ma
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
,
i
f
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
w
e
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
an
d
i
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
an
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
ar
e
w
i
l
l
b
e
th
e
m
a
i
n
fe
a
t
u
r
e
s
o
f
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
.
Ho
t
e
l
s
a
r
e
a
l
s
o
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
in
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
a
r
e
a
.
Da
y
t
i
m
e
a
n
d
ni
g
h
t
t
i
m
e
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
e
n
t
e
r
t
a
i
n
m
e
n
t
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
,
su
c
h
a
s
a
m
o
v
i
e
t
h
e
a
t
r
e
a
n
d
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
co
m
p
l
e
x
,
a
r
e
h
i
g
h
l
y
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
ar
e
a
.
ma
l
l
a
r
e
a
.
A
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
al
s
o
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
.
Th
e
p
r
e
c
i
s
e
m
i
x
o
f
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
sh
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
v
i
a
a
m
a
s
t
e
r
p
l
a
n
a
n
d
an
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
u
s
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
.
Th
e
C
i
t
y
h
a
s
f
o
r
m
e
d
a
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
pr
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
e
n
c
o
m
p
a
s
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
ma
l
l
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
T
h
e
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
al
l
o
w
s
f
o
r
m
o
s
t
o
f
t
h
e
f
u
n
d
s
d
e
r
i
v
e
d
f
r
o
m
th
e
“
t
a
x
i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
”
t
o
g
o
t
o
t
h
e
re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
.
“
T
a
x
i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
”
r
e
f
e
r
s
to
t
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
t
a
x
v
a
l
u
e
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
a
b
o
v
e
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
t
a
x
v
a
l
u
e
a
t
t
h
e
ti
m
e
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
.
Th
e
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
m
a
l
l
s
i
t
e
h
a
s
a
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
a
n
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
5
3
5
,
0
0
0
s
q
.
f
t
.
o
f
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
ab
o
v
e
t
h
e
1
,
1
1
0
,
7
0
0
s
q
.
f
t
.
o
f
s
p
a
c
e
,
w
h
i
c
h
ex
i
s
t
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
1
,
1
9
9
1
.
T
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
e
x
p
i
r
e
s
i
n
2
0
0
6
.
T
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
c
a
n
b
e
us
e
d
a
s
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
,
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
a
n
d
/
o
r
h
o
t
e
l
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
p
a
c
e
.
T
h
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
i
e
s
m
a
n
y
o
f
t
h
e
ma
l
l
’
s
f
u
t
u
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
re
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
i
n
e
f
f
e
c
t
a
t
t
h
e
t
i
m
e
of
i
t
s
a
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
M
i
x
e
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ma
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
fe
a
t
u
r
e
s
o
f
t
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
.
Ho
t
e
l
s
a
r
e
a
l
s
o
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
in
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
a
r
e
a
.
Da
y
t
i
m
e
a
n
d
ni
g
h
t
t
i
m
e
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
e
n
t
e
r
t
a
i
n
m
e
n
t
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
,
su
c
h
a
s
a
m
o
v
i
e
t
h
e
a
t
r
e
a
n
d
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
s
co
m
p
l
e
x
,
a
r
e
h
i
g
h
l
y
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
area.
ma
l
l
a
r
e
a
.
A
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
al
s
o
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
.
Th
e
p
r
e
c
i
s
e
m
i
x
o
f
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
sh
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
v
i
a
a
m
a
s
t
e
r
p
l
a
n
a
n
d
an
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
u
s
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
.
Th
e
C
i
t
y
h
a
s
f
o
r
m
e
d
a
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
pr
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
e
n
c
o
m
p
a
s
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
ma
l
l
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
T
h
e
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
al
l
o
w
s
f
o
r
m
o
s
t
o
f
t
h
e
f
u
n
d
s
d
e
r
i
v
e
d
f
r
o
m
th
e
“
t
a
x
i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
”
t
o
g
o
t
o
t
h
e
re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
.
“
T
a
x
i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
”
r
e
f
e
r
s
to
t
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
t
a
x
v
a
l
u
e
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
a
b
o
v
e
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
t
a
x
v
a
l
u
e
a
t
t
h
e
ti
m
e
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
.
Th
e
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
m
a
l
l
s
i
t
e
h
a
s
a
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
a
n
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
5
3
5
,
0
0
0
s
q
.
f
t
.
o
f
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
ab
o
v
e
t
h
e
1
,
1
1
0
,
7
0
0
s
q
.
f
t
.
o
f
s
p
a
c
e
,
w
h
i
c
h
ex
i
s
t
e
d
o
n
J
u
l
y
1
,
1
9
9
1
.
T
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
e
x
p
i
r
e
s
i
n
2
0
0
6
.
T
h
i
s
a
r
e
a
c
a
n
b
e
us
e
d
a
s
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
,
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
a
n
d
/
o
r
h
o
t
e
l
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
p
a
c
e
.
T
h
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
i
e
s
m
a
n
y
o
f
t
h
e
ma
l
l
’
s
f
u
t
u
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
re
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
i
n
e
f
f
e
c
t
a
t
t
h
e
t
i
m
e
of
i
t
s
a
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
M
i
x
e
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ma
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
,
i
f
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
4
4
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
: Up
t
o
35
un
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
T
a
b
l
e
2
A
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
,
5
0
7
,
1
8
9
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
1
,
9
0
2
,
5
4
6
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
7
0
8
,
0
5
7
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
7
0
8
,
0
5
7
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
2
5
0
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
7
6
4
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
2
0
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
7
1
1
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
To
b
e
t
t
e
r
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
t
h
e
sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
m
a
l
l
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
,
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
a
n
y
n
e
w
r
e
t
a
i
l
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
ex
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
s
i
n
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
i
t
y
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
in
d
o
o
r
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
.
N
e
w
o
f
f
i
c
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
sh
o
u
l
d
a
l
s
o
b
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
T
o
ac
h
i
e
v
e
t
h
i
s
,
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
:
1.
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
:
Av
o
i
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
,
a
n
d
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
t
h
e
he
i
g
h
t
a
n
d
b
u
l
k
o
f
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
vi
s
i
b
l
e
f
r
o
m
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
2.
L
i
n
k
a
g
e
s
:
De
v
e
l
o
p
st
r
o
n
g
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
li
n
k
a
g
e
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
p
a
r
k
a
n
d
th
e
re
g
i
o
n
a
l
m
a
l
l
a
n
d
a
l
l
o
t
h
e
r
u
s
e
s
i
n
th
e
a
r
e
a
.
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
,
i
f
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
w
e
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
an
d
i
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
Up
t
o
35
un
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
T
a
b
l
e
2
A
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
,
5
0
7
,
1
8
9
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
1
,
9
0
2
,
5
4
6
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
7
0
8
,
0
5
7
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
7
0
8
,
0
5
7
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
2
5
0
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
7
6
4
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
4
7
1
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
7
1
1
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
To
be
t
t
e
r
in
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
t
h
e
sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
ma
l
l
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
wi
t
h
t
h
e
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
,
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
a
n
y
n
e
w
r
e
t
a
i
l
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
ex
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
s
i
n
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
i
t
y
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
in
d
o
o
r
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
.
N
e
w
o
f
f
i
c
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
sh
o
u
l
d
a
l
s
o
b
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
T
o
ac
h
i
e
v
e
t
h
i
s
,
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
:
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
w
e
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
an
d
i
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
U
p
t
o
35
un
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
T
a
b
l
e
2
A
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
,
5
0
7
,
1
8
9
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
1
,
9
0
2
,
5
4
6
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
7
0
8
,
0
5
7
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
7
0
8
,
0
5
7
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
2
5
0
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
7
6
4
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
4
7
1
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
7
1
1
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
T
o
be
t
t
e
r
in
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
t
h
e
sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
ma
l
l
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
wi
t
h
t
h
e
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
,
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
a
n
y
n
e
w
r
e
t
a
i
l
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
ex
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
s
i
n
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
i
t
y
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
in
d
o
o
r
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
.
N
e
w
o
f
f
i
c
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
sh
o
u
l
d
a
l
s
o
b
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
T
o
ac
h
i
e
v
e
t
h
i
s
,
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
:
1.
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
:
Av
o
i
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
4
5
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
3.
A
c
t
i
v
e
R
e
t
a
i
l
:
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
c
t
i
v
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
fa
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
o
r
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
w
i
t
h
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
in
t
e
r
i
o
r
ma
l
l
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
,
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
s
a
n
d
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
p
a
r
k
.
4
.
B
a
r
r
i
e
r
-
f
r
e
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
:
D
e
s
i
g
n
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
ar
e
a
s
r
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
l
y
f
r
e
e
o
f
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
ba
r
r
i
e
r
s
a
n
d
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
i
s
l
a
n
d
s
.
5.
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
r
e
s
e
n
c
e
:
S
i
t
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
s
t
r
o
n
g
s
t
r
e
e
t
p
r
e
s
e
n
c
e
.
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
fa
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
i
n
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
s
c
a
l
e
o
f
t
h
e
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
c
r
o
s
s
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
6.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
N
e
x
t
t
o
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
:
Re
d
u
c
e
R
e
v
i
e
w
he
i
g
h
t
s
a
n
d
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
se
t
b
a
c
k
s
f
o
r
n
e
w
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
.
7.
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
A
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
:
In
c
l
u
d
e
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
:
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
fu
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
,
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
,
f
o
u
n
t
a
i
n
s
,
c
a
n
o
p
i
e
s
,
sp
e
c
i
a
l
p
a
v
i
n
g
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
fe
a
t
u
r
e
s
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
.
8.
T
r
e
e
s
:
Re
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
t
r
e
e
s
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
I
-
2
8
0
fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
,
W
o
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
s
m
u
c
h
a
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
w
h
e
n
ne
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
.
9.
St
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
:
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
Pa
r
k
w
a
y
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
,
w
h
i
c
h
w
a
s
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
R
o
s
e
b
o
w
l
mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
en
t
i
r
e
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
a
n
y
s
e
g
m
e
n
t
ex
t
e
n
d
e
d
i
n
t
o
S
o
u
t
h
V
a
l
l
c
o
Pa
r
k
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
We
s
t
a
r
e
a
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s:
45
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
Wi
t
h
a
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
:
u
u
p
t
o
6
0
f
e
e
t
1.
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
:
Av
o
i
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
,
a
n
d
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
t
h
e
he
i
g
h
t
a
n
d
b
u
l
k
o
f
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
vi
s
i
b
l
e
f
r
o
m
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
2.
L
i
n
k
a
g
e
s
:
De
v
e
l
o
p
st
r
o
n
g
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
li
n
k
a
g
e
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
p
a
r
k
a
n
d
th
e
re
g
i
o
n
a
l
ma
l
l
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
a
n
d
a
l
l
ot
h
e
r
u
s
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
3.
A
c
t
i
v
e
R
e
t
a
i
l
:
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
c
t
i
v
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
fa
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
o
r
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
w
i
t
h
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
in
t
e
r
i
o
r
ma
l
l
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
,
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
s
a
n
d
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
p
a
r
k
.
4
.
B
a
r
r
i
e
r
-
f
r
e
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
:
D
e
s
i
g
n
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
ar
e
a
s
r
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
l
y
f
r
e
e
o
f
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
ba
r
r
i
e
r
s
a
n
d
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
i
s
l
a
n
d
s
.
5.
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
r
e
s
e
n
c
e
:
S
i
t
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
s
t
r
o
n
g
s
t
r
e
e
t
p
r
e
s
e
n
c
e
.
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
fa
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
i
n
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
s
c
a
l
e
o
f
t
h
e
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
c
r
o
s
s
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
6.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
N
e
x
t
t
o
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
:
Re
d
u
c
e
R
e
v
i
e
w
he
i
g
h
t
s
a
n
d
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
se
t
b
a
c
k
s
f
o
r
n
e
w
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
.
7.
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
A
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
:
In
c
l
u
d
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
am
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
:
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
f
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
,
li
g
h
t
i
n
g
,
f
o
u
n
t
a
i
n
s
,
c
a
n
o
p
i
e
s
,
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
pa
v
i
n
g
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
t
o
en
h
a
n
c
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
.
8.
Tr
e
e
s
:
Re
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
t
r
e
e
s
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
I
-
2
8
0
fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
,
W
o
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
s
m
u
c
h
a
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
w
h
e
n
ne
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
.
9.
St
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
:
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
Pa
r
k
w
a
y
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
,
w
h
i
c
h
w
a
s
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
R
o
s
e
b
o
w
l
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
,
a
n
d
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
t
h
e
he
i
g
h
t
a
n
d
b
u
l
k
o
f
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
vi
s
i
b
l
e
f
r
o
m
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
2.
L
i
n
k
a
g
e
s
:
De
v
e
l
o
p
st
r
o
n
g
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
li
n
k
a
g
e
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
p
a
r
k
a
n
d
th
e
re
g
i
o
n
a
l
ma
l
l
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
a
n
d
a
l
l
ot
h
e
r
u
s
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
3.
A
c
t
i
v
e
R
e
t
a
i
l
:
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
c
t
i
v
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
fa
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
o
r
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
w
i
t
h
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
interior
ma
l
l
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
,
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
s
a
n
d
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
p
a
r
k
.
4
.
B
a
r
r
i
e
r
-
f
r
e
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
:
D
e
s
i
g
n
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
ar
e
a
s
r
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
l
y
f
r
e
e
o
f
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
ba
r
r
i
e
r
s
a
n
d
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
i
s
l
a
n
d
s
.
5.
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
r
e
s
e
n
c
e
:
S
i
t
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
s
t
r
o
n
g
s
t
r
e
e
t
p
r
e
s
e
n
c
e
.
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
fa
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
i
n
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
s
c
a
l
e
o
f
t
h
e
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
c
r
o
s
s
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
6.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
N
e
x
t
t
o
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
:
Re
d
u
c
e
R
e
v
i
e
w
he
i
g
h
t
s
a
n
d
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
se
t
b
a
c
k
s
f
o
r
n
e
w
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
.
7.
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
A
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
:
In
c
l
u
d
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
am
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
:
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
f
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
,
li
g
h
t
i
n
g
,
f
o
u
n
t
a
i
n
s
,
c
a
n
o
p
i
e
s
,
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
pa
v
i
n
g
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
t
o
en
h
a
n
c
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
.
8.
Tr
e
e
s
:
Re
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
t
r
e
e
s
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
I
-
2
8
0
fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
,
W
o
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
Cr
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
s
m
u
c
h
a
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
wh
e
n
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
.
9.
St
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
:
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
Pa
r
k
w
a
y
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
,
w
h
i
c
h
w
a
s
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
R
o
s
e
b
o
w
l
mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
en
t
i
r
e
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
a
n
y
s
e
g
m
e
n
t
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
4
6
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
wi
t
h
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
a
r
e
t
a
i
l
co
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
o
f
6
0
f
e
e
t
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
is
a
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
a
n
d
4
5
f
e
e
t
i
f
n
o
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
Va
l
l
c
o
S
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
M
a
s
t
e
r
Pl
a
n
.
:
De
v
e
l
o
p
a
n
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
V
a
l
l
c
o
Sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
w
h
i
c
h
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
ci
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
ty
p
l
a
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
. R
e
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
l
i
g
h
t
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
t
o
s
u
pp
o
r
t
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
in
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
mi
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
en
t
i
r
e
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
a
n
y
s
e
g
m
e
n
t
ex
t
e
n
d
e
d
i
n
t
o
S
o
u
t
h
V
a
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
W
e
s
t
a
r
e
a
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s:
So
u
t
h
V
a
l
l
c
o
Pa
r
k
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
W
e
s
t
:
45
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
Wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
:
up
t
o
6
0
f
e
e
t
,
or
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
w
i
t
h
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
o
n
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
o
r
W
o
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
w
i
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
a
n
d
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
:
up
t
o
8
5
f
e
e
t
f
o
r
a
di
s
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
2
7
5
f
e
e
t
a
s
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
d
f
r
o
m
th
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
.
So
u
t
h
V
a
l
l
c
o
Pa
r
k
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
E
a
s
t
:
60
f
e
e
t
Wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
:
u
p
t
o
7
5
f
e
e
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
w
i
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
a
n
d
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
i
n
a
r
e
a
b
o
u
n
d
e
d
b
y
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
o
n
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
,
I
-
2
8
0
o
n
t
h
e
no
r
t
h
,
V
a
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
o
n
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
a
n
d
Pe
r
i
m
e
t
e
r
R
o
a
d
o
n
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
:
u
p
t
o
1
1
0
fe
e
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
Va
l
l
c
o
S
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
M
a
s
t
e
r
Pl
a
n
. D
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
n
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
V
a
l
l
c
o
Sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
w
h
i
c
h
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
ci
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
ty
p
l
a
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
l
a
t
e
n
i
g
h
t
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
S
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
Ma
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
i
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
o
f
a
M
a
s
t
e
r
Us
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
Re
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
l
i
g
h
t
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
t
o
s
u
pp
o
r
t
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
in
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
ex
t
e
n
d
e
d
i
n
t
o
S
o
u
t
h
V
a
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
W
e
s
t
a
r
e
a
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s:
So
u
t
h
V
a
l
l
c
o
Pa
r
k
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
W
e
s
t
:
60
f
e
e
t
,
o
r
Wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
:
up
t
o
7
5
f
e
e
t
, or
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
w
i
t
h
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
o
n
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
o
r
W
o
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
w
i
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
a
n
d
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
:
u
p
t
o
8
5
f
e
e
t
f
o
r
a
di
s
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
2
7
5
f
e
e
t
a
s
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
d
f
r
o
m
th
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
i
n
e
.
So
u
t
h
V
a
l
l
c
o
Pa
r
k
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
E
a
s
t
:
60
f
e
e
t
Wi
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
:
u
p
t
o
7
5
f
e
e
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
w
i
t
h
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
a
n
d
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
i
n
a
r
e
a
b
o
u
n
d
e
d
b
y
Wo
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
o
n
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
,
I
-
2
8
0
o
n
t
h
e
no
r
t
h
,
V
a
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
o
n
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
a
n
d
Pe
r
i
m
e
t
e
r
R
o
a
d
o
n
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
:
u
p
t
o
1
1
0
fe
e
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
Va
l
l
c
o
S
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
M
a
s
t
e
r
Pl
a
n
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
a
n
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
V
a
l
l
c
o
Sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
w
h
i
c
h
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
ci
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
ty
p
l
a
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
l
a
t
e
n
i
g
h
t
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
S
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
Ma
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
i
s
s
u
a
n
c
e
o
f
a
M
a
s
t
e
r
Us
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
Re
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
l
i
g
h
t
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
f
o
r
s
u
pp
o
r
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
us
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
4
7
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Ne
g
o
t
i
a
t
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
23
.
A
(
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
)
a
n
d
t
h
e
vi
s
i
o
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
S
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
Ne
g
o
t
i
a
t
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
23
.
A
(
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
B
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
)
a
n
d
t
h
e
vi
s
i
o
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
S
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
26
.
H
2
9
:
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Re
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
s
a
m
i
x
e
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
an
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
D
e
An
z
a
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
,
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
,
C
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
an
d
V
a
l
l
c
o
F
a
s
h
i
o
n
M
a
l
l
.
T
h
i
s
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
ex
t
e
n
d
s
f
r
o
m
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
e
r
n
ci
t
y
l
i
m
i
t
s
a
n
d
i
s
s
p
l
i
t
i
n
t
o
t
h
r
e
e
s
e
g
m
e
n
t
s
:
“W
e
s
t
,
”
“
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
”
a
n
d
“
E
a
s
t
.
”
T
h
e
Cr
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
Ar
e
a
i
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
We
s
t
e
r
n
a
n
d
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
Ar
e
a
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
T
h
e
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
Cr
e
e
k
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
ar
e
a
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
t
h
e
“
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
th
e
C
i
t
y
”
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
a
n
d
gu
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
o
r
o
f
f
i
c
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
sh
a
l
l
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
i
n
m
i
d
-
b
l
o
c
k
p
a
r
c
e
l
s
.
Pa
r
c
e
l
s
o
n
o
r
n
e
a
r
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
s
h
a
l
l
h
a
v
e
a
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
-
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
l
l
be
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
o
n
a
c
a
s
e
-
b
y
-
c
a
s
e
b
a
s
i
s
.
1.
W
e
s
t
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
f
r
o
m
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
t
o
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
)
:
T
h
i
s
ar
e
a
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
t
h
e
O
a
k
s
S
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
Ce
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
t
h
e
D
e
A
n
z
a
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Co
l
l
e
g
e
c
a
m
p
u
s
.
N
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
th
i
s
a
r
e
a
s
h
o
u
l
d
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
m
i
x
e
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
/
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
4
8
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
2.
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
f
r
o
m
De
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
e
a
s
t
t
o
P
o
r
t
a
l
Av
e
n
u
e
)
:
N
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
h
a
l
l
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
of
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
/
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
o
f
f
i
c
e
u
s
e
s
o
n
th
e
f
i
r
s
t
f
l
o
o
r
.
O
f
f
i
c
e
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
o
n
th
e
s
e
c
o
n
d
f
l
o
o
r
.
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
mi
x
e
d
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
.
3.
E
a
s
t
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
(
f
r
o
m
Po
r
t
a
l
A
v
e
n
u
e
t
o
e
a
s
t
e
r
n
C
i
t
y
l
i
m
i
t
s
)
:
Ne
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
h
a
l
l
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
o
f
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
/
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
u
s
e
s
o
n
t
h
e
fi
r
s
t
f
l
o
o
r
.
O
f
f
i
c
e
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
o
n
th
e
s
e
c
o
n
d
f
l
o
o
r
.
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
mi
x
e
d
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
M
i
x
e
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ma
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
an
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
,
i
f
t
h
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
w
e
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
be
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
am
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
i
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
Up
t
o
25
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
.
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
s
h
a
l
l
h
a
v
e
a
fr
o
n
t
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
o
f
3
5
f
e
e
t
a
s
d
e
f
i
n
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
H
e
a
r
t
of
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
.
I
n
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
l
o
t
s
,
pa
r
k
i
n
g
ar
r
a
n
g
e
m
e
n
t
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
su
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
;
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
to
t
h
e
s
i
d
e
o
r
r
e
a
r
o
f
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
i
s
d
e
s
i
r
a
b
l
e
.
No
v
i
s
i
b
l
e
g
a
r
a
g
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
4
9
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
.
S
u
b
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
/
d
e
c
k
pa
r
k
i
n
g
i
s
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
i
t
i
s
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
l
y
sc
r
e
e
n
e
d
f
r
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
o
r
ad
j
a
c
e
n
t
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s:
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
he
i
g
h
t
o
f
45
f
e
e
t
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
27
3
3
:
N
o
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
th
e
No
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
as
a
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
em
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
c
e
n
t
e
r
w
i
t
h
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
O
f
f
i
c
e
,
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
,
re
s
e
a
r
c
h
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
Th
i
s
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
re
m
a
i
n
s
a
p
r
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
n
t
l
y
o
f
f
i
c
e
ar
e
a
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
I-
2
8
0
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
M
i
x
e
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ma
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
,
i
f
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
w
e
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
an
d
i
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
T
h
e
A
p
p
l
e
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
c
a
m
p
u
s
sh
a
l
l
n
o
t
h
a
v
e
a
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
T
a
b
l
e
2
A
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
Up
t
o
25
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
p
e
r
gr
o
s
s
ac
r
e
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
27
3
3
:
N
o
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
th
e
No
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
as
a
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
em
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
c
e
n
t
e
r
w
i
t
h
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Of
f
i
c
e
,
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
,
re
s
e
a
r
c
h
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
Th
i
s
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
re
m
a
i
n
s
a
p
r
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
n
t
l
y
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
r
e
a
wi
t
h
su
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
ho
t
e
l
s
fr
o
m
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
t
o
I
-
28
0
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
M
i
x
e
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ma
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
,
i
f
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
w
e
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
an
d
i
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
T
h
e
A
p
p
l
e
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
c
C
a
m
p
u
s
1
sh
a
l
l
n
o
t
h
a
v
e
a
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
T
a
b
l
e
2
A
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
Up
t
o
25
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
p
e
r
gr
o
s
s
ac
r
e
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
27
3
3
:
N
o
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
th
e
No
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
as
a
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
em
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
c
e
n
t
e
r
w
i
t
h
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Of
f
i
c
e
,
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
,
re
s
e
a
r
c
h
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
Th
i
s
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
re
m
a
i
n
s
a
p
r
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
n
t
l
y
o
f
f
i
c
e
ar
e
a
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
M
i
x
e
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ma
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
,
i
f
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
w
e
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
an
d
i
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
T
h
e
A
p
p
l
e
C
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
c
C
a
m
p
u
s
1
sh
a
l
l
n
o
t
h
a
v
e
a
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
:
T
a
b
l
e
2
A
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
Up
t
o
25
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
p
e
r
gr
o
s
s
ac
r
e
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
5
0
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
3
6
,
6
5
7
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
5
1
,
3
7
2
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
2
,
1
8
1
,
0
2
1
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
,
2
6
6
,
2
0
6
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
3
8
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
-
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
4
9
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
14
6
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
A
n
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
se
t
b
a
c
k
n
e
x
t
t
o
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
i
s
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
f
r
o
m
A
l
v
e
s
D
r
i
v
e
t
o
Ro
u
t
e
I
-
28
0
.
Th
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
a
r
e
a
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
by
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
m
e
d
i
a
n
s
a
n
d
g
e
n
e
r
o
u
s
pr
i
v
a
t
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
a
r
e
a
s
.
T
h
e
5
0
-
f
o
o
t
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
m
a
y
b
e
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
ac
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
t
o
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
i
z
e
,
s
c
a
l
e
an
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
y
p
e
.
D
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
s
a
n
d
st
r
e
e
t
s
o
n
t
o
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
di
s
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
t
o
a
v
o
i
d
d
i
s
r
u
p
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
co
n
t
i
n
u
i
t
y
o
f
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
t
h
e
f
l
o
w
o
f
tr
a
f
f
i
c
.
T
o
s
t
r
e
n
g
t
h
e
n
t
h
e
v
i
s
u
a
l
e
f
f
e
c
t
o
f
t
h
i
s
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
,
n
e
w
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
be
s
i
t
e
d
t
o
f
r
a
m
e
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
a
n
d
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
.
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
co
m
p
a
n
y
s
t
o
r
e
s
,
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
s
e
a
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
f
r
o
n
t
en
t
r
i
e
s
a
r
e
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s: Ma
x
i
m
u
m
he
i
g
h
t
o
f
45
f
e
e
t
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
3
6
,
6
5
7
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
5
1
,
3
7
2
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
2
,
1
8
1
,
0
2
1
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
,
2
6
6
,
2
0
6
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
3
8
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
-
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
4
9
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
1
4
6
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
A
n
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
se
t
b
a
c
k
n
e
x
t
t
o
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
i
s
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
f
r
o
m
A
l
v
e
s
D
r
i
v
e
t
o
Ro
u
t
e
I
-
28
0
.
Th
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
a
r
e
a
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
by
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
m
e
d
i
a
n
s
a
n
d
g
e
n
e
r
o
u
s
pr
i
v
a
t
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
a
r
e
a
s
.
T
h
e
5
0
-
f
o
o
t
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
m
a
y
b
e
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
ac
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
t
o
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
i
z
e
,
s
c
a
l
e
a
n
d
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
y
p
e
.
D
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
s
a
n
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
on
t
o
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
di
s
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
t
o
a
v
o
i
d
d
i
s
r
u
p
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
co
n
t
i
n
u
i
t
y
o
f
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
t
h
e
f
l
o
w
o
f
tr
a
f
f
i
c
.
T
o
s
t
r
e
n
g
t
h
e
n
t
h
e
v
i
s
u
a
l
e
f
f
e
c
t
o
f
t
h
i
s
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
,
n
e
w
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
be
s
i
t
e
d
t
o
f
r
a
m
e
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
a
n
d
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
.
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
co
m
p
a
n
y
s
t
o
r
e
s
,
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
s
e
a
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
f
r
o
n
t
en
t
r
i
e
s
a
r
e
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s: Ma
x
i
m
u
m
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
3
6
,
6
5
7
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
5
1
,
3
7
2
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
2
,
1
8
1
,
0
2
1
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
,
2
6
6
,
2
0
6
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
3
8
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
-
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
4
9
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
1
4
6
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
A
n
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
se
t
b
a
c
k
n
e
x
t
t
o
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
i
s
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
f
r
o
m
A
l
v
e
s
D
r
i
v
e
t
o
Ro
u
t
e
I
-
280.
Th
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
a
r
e
a
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
by
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
m
e
d
i
a
n
s
a
n
d
g
e
n
e
r
o
u
s
pr
i
v
a
t
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
a
r
e
a
s
.
T
h
e
5
0
-
f
o
o
t
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
m
a
y
b
e
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
ac
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
t
o
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
i
z
e
,
s
c
a
l
e
an
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
y
p
e
.
D
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
s
a
n
d
st
r
e
e
t
s
o
n
t
o
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
di
s
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
t
o
a
v
o
i
d
d
i
s
r
u
p
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
co
n
t
i
n
u
i
t
y
o
f
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
t
h
e
f
l
o
w
o
f
tr
a
f
f
i
c
.
T
o
s
t
r
e
n
g
t
h
e
n
t
h
e
v
i
s
u
a
l
e
f
f
e
c
t
o
f
t
h
i
s
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
,
n
e
w
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
be
s
i
t
e
d
t
o
f
r
a
m
e
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
a
n
d
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
.
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
co
m
p
a
n
y
s
t
o
r
e
s
,
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
s
e
a
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
f
r
o
n
t
en
t
r
i
e
s
a
r
e
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s:
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
he
i
g
h
t
o
f
4
5
70
7
5
fe
e
t
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
5
1
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
he
i
g
h
t
o
f
4
5
6
0
fe
e
t
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
8
:
S
o
u
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
th
e
So
u
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
a
s
a
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
T
h
i
s
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
re
m
a
i
n
s
a
p
r
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
n
t
l
y
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
wi
t
h
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
us
e
s
.
F
o
r
p
a
r
c
e
l
s
t
h
a
t
c
a
n
n
o
t
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
su
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
of
f
i
c
e
u
s
e
s
m
a
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
wi
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
2
5
d
w
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
:
30
f
e
e
t
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
8
:
S
o
u
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
th
e
So
u
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
Are
a
a
s
a
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
T
h
i
s
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
re
m
a
i
n
s
a
p
r
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
n
t
l
y
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
wi
t
h
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
us
e
s
.
F
o
r
p
a
r
c
e
l
s
t
h
a
t
c
a
n
n
o
t
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
su
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
of
f
i
c
e
u
s
e
s
m
a
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
wi
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
2
5
d
w
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
:
30
f
e
e
t
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
2
8
:
S
o
u
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
th
e
So
u
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
a
s
a
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
T
h
i
s
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
re
m
a
i
n
s
a
p
r
e
d
o
m
i
n
a
n
t
l
y
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
w
i
t
h
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
us
e
s
.
F
o
r
p
a
r
c
e
l
s
t
h
a
t
c
a
n
n
o
t
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
su
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
of
f
i
c
e
u
s
e
s
m
a
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
wi
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
2
5
d
w
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
,
or
40
d
w
e
l
l
i
n
g
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
fo
r
t
h
e
S
u
m
m
e
r
w
i
n
d
s
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
si
t
e
s
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
:
30
f
e
e
t
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
29
3
6
:
B
u
b
b
R
o
a
d
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
Re
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
B
u
b
b
R
o
a
d
a
r
e
a
p
r
i
m
a
r
i
l
y
a
s
a
l
o
w
-
ri
s
e
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ar
e
a
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
Al
l
o
w
e
d
u
s
e
s
co
n
s
i
s
t
o
f
t
h
o
s
e
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
We
s
t
Va
l
l
e
y
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
P
a
r
k
M
L
-
r
c
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
.
I
n
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
li
m
i
t
e
d
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
.
Co
m
p
a
t
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
n
o
n
-
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
w
i
t
h
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
m
u
s
t
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
w
h
e
n
re
v
i
e
w
i
n
g
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
5
2
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
Up
t
o
20
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
un
i
t
s
p
e
r
gr
o
s
s
ac
r
e
.
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
-
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
-
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
4
2
8
,
6
4
5
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
4
4
4
,
4
3
5
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
-
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
-
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
-
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
9
4
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
L
o
c
a
l
s
e
r
v
i
n
g
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
is
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
t
o
pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
c
l
o
s
e
r
t
o
e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
ce
n
t
e
r
s
a
n
d
t
o
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
ac
t
i
v
i
t
y
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s: Ma
x
i
m
u
m
he
i
g
h
t
o
f
45
f
e
e
t
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
30
2
4
:
M
o
n
t
a
V
i
s
t
a
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
Re
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
M
o
n
t
a
V
i
s
t
a
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
a
s
a
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
no
d
e
a
r
e
a
,
w
i
t
h
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
bi
c
y
c
l
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
.
T
h
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
se
r
v
e
a
s
a
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
fo
r
M
o
n
t
a
V
i
s
t
a
Vi
l
l
a
g
e
an
d
i
t
s
a
d
j
o
i
n
i
n
g
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
.
M
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
w
i
t
h
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
i
s
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
30
2
4
:
M
o
n
t
a
V
i
s
t
a
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
Re
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
M
o
n
t
a
V
i
s
t
a
Vi
l
l
a
g
e
as
a
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
no
d
e
a
r
e
a
,
w
i
t
h
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
bi
c
y
c
l
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
.
T
h
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
se
r
v
e
a
s
a
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
fo
r
M
o
n
t
a
V
i
s
t
a
Vi
l
l
a
g
e
an
d
i
t
s
a
d
j
o
i
n
i
n
g
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
.
M
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
w
i
t
h
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
i
s
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
30
2
4
:
M
o
n
t
a
V
i
s
t
a
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
Re
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
M
o
n
t
a
V
i
s
t
a
Vi
l
l
a
g
e
as a
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
no
d
e
a
r
e
a
,
w
i
t
h
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
bi
c
y
c
l
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
.
T
h
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
se
r
v
e
a
s
a
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
fo
r
M
o
n
t
a
V
i
s
t
a
Vi
l
l
a
g
e
an
d
i
t
s
a
d
j
o
i
n
i
n
g
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
.
M
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
w
i
t
h
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
i
s
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
5
3
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
en
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
.
T
h
e
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
re
t
a
i
n
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
m
a
l
l
-
s
c
a
l
e
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
an
d
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
,
w
h
i
l
e
re
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
Up
t
o
12
1
5
un
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
a
n
d
a
s
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
L
a
n
d
Us
e
M
a
p
.
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
9
2
,
3
8
7
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
9
9
,
6
9
8
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
4
3
1
,
1
5
3
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
4
5
6
,
2
1
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
-
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
-
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
8
2
8
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
90
2
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
1.
I
n
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
A
c
c
e
s
s
.
In
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
h
a
v
e
i
n
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
a
n
d
sh
a
r
e
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
2.
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
o
r
en
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
.
T
h
e
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
re
t
a
i
n
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
m
a
l
l
-
s
c
a
l
e
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
an
d
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
,
w
h
i
l
e
re
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
Up
t
o
12
1
5
un
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
a
n
d
a
s
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
L
a
n
d
Us
e
M
a
p
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
9
2
,
3
8
7
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
9
9
,
6
9
8
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
4
3
1
,
1
5
3
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
4
5
6
,
2
1
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
-
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
-
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
8
2
8
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
9
0
2
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
1.
I
n
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
A
c
c
e
s
s
.
In
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
h
a
v
e
i
n
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
a
n
d
sh
a
r
e
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
en
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
.
T
h
e
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
re
t
a
i
n
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
m
a
l
l
-
s
c
a
l
e
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
an
d
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
,
w
h
i
l
e
re
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
Up
t
o
12 15
un
i
t
s
p
e
r
a
c
r
e
a
n
d
a
s
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
L
a
n
d
Us
e
M
a
p
.
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
9
2
,
3
8
7
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
9
9
,
6
9
8
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
4
3
1
,
1
5
3
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
4
5
6
,
2
1
0
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
-
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
-
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
8
2
8
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
9
0
2
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
1.
I
n
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
A
c
c
e
s
s
.
In
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
h
a
v
e
i
n
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
a
n
d
sh
a
r
e
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
5
4
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
m
a
y
re
l
y
o
n
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
o
n
P
a
s
a
d
e
n
a
a
n
d
Im
p
e
r
i
a
l
A
v
e
n
u
e
s
t
o
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
i
r
o
f
f
-
s
t
r
e
e
t
pa
r
k
i
n
g
n
e
e
d
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
b
o
u
n
d
e
d
by
G
r
a
n
a
d
a
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
O
r
a
n
g
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
Un
i
o
n
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
r
i
g
h
t
o
f
w
a
y
.
(
s
e
e
f
i
g
u
r
e
a
t
le
f
t
)
.
3.
S
t
o
r
e
f
r
o
n
t
A
p
p
e
a
r
a
n
c
e
.
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
of
f
i
c
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
s
h
a
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
s
t
o
r
e
f
r
o
n
t
ap
p
e
a
r
a
n
c
e
t
o
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
t
r
e
e
t
,
a
n
d
sh
a
l
l
n
o
t
b
e
s
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
d
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
b
y
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
o
r
ch
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
.
O
f
f
i
c
e
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
t
o
ac
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
f
o
r
f
u
t
u
r
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
.
4.
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
sh
a
l
l
m
a
y
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
se
m
i
-
r
u
r
a
l
a
p
p
e
a
r
a
n
c
e
,
e
x
c
e
p
t
t
h
a
t
S
a
f
e
Ro
u
t
e
s
t
o
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
, o
r
a
n
y
o
t
h
e
r
s
so
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
, s
h
a
l
l
ha
v
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
.
5.
M
o
n
t
a
V
i
s
t
a
D
e
s
i
g
n
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
.
Ev
a
l
u
a
t
e
th
e
M
o
n
t
a
V
i
s
t
a
D
e
s
i
g
n
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
t
o
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
i
f
r
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
n
e
e
d
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
a
n
d
c
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s. :
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
h
e
i
g
h
t
o
f
30
f
e
e
t
2.
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
o
r
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
m
a
y
re
l
y
o
n
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
o
n
P
a
s
a
d
e
n
a
a
n
d
Im
p
e
r
i
a
l
A
v
e
n
u
e
s
t
o
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
i
r
o
f
f
-
s
t
r
e
e
t
pa
r
k
i
n
g
n
e
e
d
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
b
o
u
n
d
e
d
by
G
r
a
n
a
d
a
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
O
r
a
n
g
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
Un
i
o
n
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
r
i
g
h
t
o
f
w
a
y
. (s
e
e
f
i
g
u
r
e
a
t
le
f
t
)
.
3.
S
t
o
r
e
f
r
o
n
t
A
p
p
e
a
r
a
n
c
e
.
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
of
f
i
c
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
s
h
a
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
s
t
o
r
e
f
r
o
n
t
ap
p
e
a
r
a
n
c
e
t
o
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
t
r
e
e
t
,
a
n
d
sh
a
l
l
n
o
t
b
e
s
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
d
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
b
y
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
o
r
ch
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
.
O
f
f
i
c
e
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
t
o
ac
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
f
o
r
f
u
t
u
r
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
.
4.
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
sh
a
l
l
m
a
y
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
s
e
m
i
-
ru
r
a
l
a
p
p
e
a
r
a
n
c
e
,
e
x
c
e
p
t
t
h
a
t
S
a
f
e
Ro
u
t
e
s
t
o
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
, o
r
a
n
y
o
t
h
e
r
s
so
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
, s
h
a
l
l
ha
v
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
.
5.
M
o
n
t
a
V
i
s
t
a
D
e
s
i
g
n
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
.
Ev
a
l
u
a
t
e
th
e
M
o
n
t
a
V
i
s
t
a
D
e
s
i
g
n
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
t
o
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
i
f
r
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
n
e
e
d
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
a
n
d
c
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s. :
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
h
e
i
g
h
t
o
f
30
f
e
e
t
2.
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
o
r
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
m
a
y
re
l
y
o
n
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
o
n
P
a
s
a
d
e
n
a
a
n
d
Im
p
e
r
i
a
l
A
v
e
n
u
e
s
t
o
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
i
r
o
f
f
-
s
t
r
e
e
t
pa
r
k
i
n
g
n
e
e
d
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
b
o
u
n
d
e
d
by
G
r
a
n
a
d
a
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
O
r
a
n
g
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
Un
i
o
n
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
r
i
g
h
t
o
f
w
a
y
. (s
e
e
f
i
g
u
r
e
a
t
le
f
t
)
.
3.
S
t
o
r
e
f
r
o
n
t
A
p
p
e
a
r
a
n
c
e
.
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
of
f
i
c
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
s
h
a
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
s
t
o
r
e
f
r
o
n
t
ap
p
e
a
r
a
n
c
e
t
o
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
t
r
e
e
t
,
a
n
d
sh
a
l
l
n
o
t
b
e
s
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
d
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
b
y
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
o
r
ch
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
o
n
.
O
f
f
i
c
e
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
t
o
ac
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
si
d
e
w
a
l
k
f
o
r
f
u
t
u
r
e
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
.
4.
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
sh
a
l
l
m
a
y
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
se
m
i
-
r
u
r
a
l
a
p
p
e
a
r
a
n
c
e
, e
x
c
e
p
t
t
h
a
t
S
a
f
e
Ro
u
t
e
s
t
o
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
,
o
r
a
n
y
o
t
h
e
r
s
so
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
, shall
ha
v
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
.
5.
M
o
n
t
a
V
i
s
t
a
D
e
s
i
g
n
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
.
Evaluate
th
e
M
o
n
t
a
V
i
s
t
a
D
e
s
i
g
n
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
t
o
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
i
f
r
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
n
e
e
d
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
a
n
d
c
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
s. :
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
h
e
i
g
h
t
o
f
30
f
e
e
t
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
32
31
:
Re
m
a
i
n
d
e
r
o
f
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
O
t
h
e
r
No
n
-
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
/M
i
x
e
d
-
U
s
e
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
.
Re
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
,
w
h
i
c
h
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
g
o
o
d
s
a
n
d
se
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
o
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
vi
s
i
t
o
r
s
.
T
h
e
s
e
a
r
e
a
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
:
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
5
5
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
So
u
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
.
We
s
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
o
a
d
ac
r
o
s
s
f
r
o
m
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
R
o
a
d
.
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
.
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
n
e
a
r
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
.
No
r
t
h
w
e
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
Bl
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
.
So
u
t
h
e
a
s
t
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
Bl
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
.
No
r
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
be
t
w
e
e
n
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
8
5
a
n
d
M
a
r
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
.
Al
l
o
t
h
e
r
n
o
n
-
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
n
o
t
re
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
d
i
n
a
n
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
ar
e
a
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
a
r
e
en
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
p
r
e
s
e
n
c
e
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
m
a
y
b
e
o
c
c
u
p
i
e
d
s
o
l
e
l
y
b
y
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
o
r
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
us
e
s
,
b
u
t
n
o
t
s
o
l
e
l
y
b
y
o
f
f
i
c
e
,
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
-
of
f
i
c
e
o
r
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
ma
y
b
e
o
n
e
o
r
t
w
o
s
t
o
r
i
e
s
i
n
h
e
i
g
h
t
,
t
o
b
e
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
o
n
a
c
a
s
e
-
b
y
-
c
a
s
e
b
a
s
i
s
.
Gr
o
u
n
d
-
l
e
v
e
l
u
s
e
s
n
e
a
r
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
m
u
s
t
b
e
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
w
i
t
h
a
tr
a
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
s
t
o
r
e
f
r
o
n
t
a
p
p
e
a
r
a
n
c
e
.
S
e
c
o
n
d
-
le
v
e
l
a
r
e
a
s
m
a
y
b
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
o
f
f
i
c
e
o
r
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
.
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
u
s
e
d
as
a
b
u
f
f
e
r
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
n
d
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
i
n
g
l
o
w
-
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
m
a
y
b
e
u
s
e
d
a
s
a
bu
f
f
e
r
i
n
s
m
a
l
l
e
r
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
M
i
x
e
d
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
5
6
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ma
y
b
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
i
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
,
i
f
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
w
e
l
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
,
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
an
d
i
s
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
or
i
e
n
t
e
d
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
: Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
n
s
i
t
y
i
s
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
o
n
t
h
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
co
n
t
e
x
t
,
w
i
t
h
a
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
o
f
1
5
dw
e
l
l
i
n
g
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
gr
o
s
s
ac
r
e
.
(
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
El
e
m
e
n
t
s
i
t
e
s
)
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
4
9
7
,
2
4
7
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
4
9
5
,
4
1
5
Of
f
i
c
e
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
2
6
8
,
7
3
5
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
5
0
,
6
0
4
Ho
t
e
l
(
r
o
o
m
s
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
-
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
0
1
0
-
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
6
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
3
0
6
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
Z
o
n
i
n
g
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
a
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
Z
o
n
i
n
g
Or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
h
a
t
d
e
f
i
n
e
s
t
h
e
u
s
e
s
a
n
d
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
t
h
i
s
z
o
n
e
.
R
e
z
o
n
e
ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
a
r
e
a
s
t
o
t
h
i
s
z
o
n
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
32
2
5
:
O
a
k
V
a
l
l
e
y
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
Re
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
O
a
k
V
a
l
l
e
y
a
s
a
u
n
i
q
u
e
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
.
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
5
7
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
e
d
b
y
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
ar
e
a
s
a
n
d
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
a
n
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
i
s
g
o
v
e
r
n
e
d
b
y
a
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
a
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
t
h
e
u
s
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
a
n
d
ot
h
e
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
s
.
T
h
e
s
e
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
s
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
s
,
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
a
n
d
s
t
y
l
e
s
o
f
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
a
r
k
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
t
r
e
e
pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
,
a
c
c
e
s
s
a
n
d
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
.
Th
e
t
h
e
m
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
s
i
s
t
o
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
by
c
l
u
s
t
e
r
i
n
g
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
s
e
t
t
i
n
g
i
t
b
a
c
k
fr
o
m
s
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
e
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
pr
e
s
e
r
v
i
n
g
l
a
r
g
e
a
r
e
a
s
i
n
p
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
o
p
e
n
sp
a
c
e
.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
7
8
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
1
7
8
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
B
a
s
e
d
o
n
Sl
o
p
e
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
F
o
r
m
u
l
a
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
s
a
r
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
re
f
l
e
c
t
t
r
a
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
s
t
y
l
e
s
a
n
d
u
s
e
of
na
t
u
r
a
l
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
:
28
o
r
3
0
f
e
e
t
A
s
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
O
a
k
V
a
l
l
e
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Pl
a
n
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
33
2
6
:
F
a
i
r
g
r
o
v
e
Ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
Pr
e
s
e
r
v
e
t
h
e
u
n
i
q
u
e
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
E
i
c
h
l
e
r
ho
m
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
F
a
i
r
g
r
o
v
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
:
R
e
t
a
i
n
a
r
e
a
a
s
a
l
o
w
de
n
s
i
t
y
s
i
n
g
l
e
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
5
8
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
De
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
Re
q
u
i
r
e
a
l
l
n
e
w
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
c
o
n
f
o
r
m
t
o
th
e
Ei
c
h
l
e
r
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
t
h
e
R1
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
.
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
(
E
i
c
h
l
e
r
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
)
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
2
2
0
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
2
2
0
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:
5
u
n
i
t
s
p
e
r
ac
r
e
De
s
i
g
n
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
.
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
t
o
in
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
i
l
l
u
s
t
r
a
t
e
d
i
n
th
e
E
i
c
h
l
e
r
D
e
s
i
g
n
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
Fa
i
r
g
r
o
v
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
H
e
i
g
h
t
:
2
8
f
e
e
t
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
3
4
:
Ot
h
e
r
Ar
e
a
s
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
Th
e
r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
a
r
e
a
r
e
a
s
t
h
a
t
ar
e
n
o
t
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
a
s
u
n
i
q
u
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
a
t
th
i
s
t
i
m
e
a
n
d
a
r
e
n
o
t
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
i
s
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
b
y
la
n
d
us
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
z
o
n
i
n
g
an
d
l
a
n
d
us
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
.s.
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
D
U
)
20
1
0
B
u
i
l
t
1
7
,
6
2
0
Bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
1
7
,
4
9
2
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
91
3
5
:
N
e
w
D
r
i
v
e
-
U
p
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Pe
r
m
i
t
n
e
w
d
r
i
v
e
-
u
p
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
o
r
i
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
o
n
l
y
wh
e
n
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
c
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
,
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
,
n
o
i
s
e
co
n
t
r
o
l
,
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
,
a
n
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
ar
e
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
v
i
s
u
a
l
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
su
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
u
s
e
s
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
a
r
e
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
5
9
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
ad
e
q
u
a
t
e
l
y
b
u
f
f
e
r
e
d
.
P
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
d
r
i
v
e
-
u
p
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
in
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
.
F
u
r
t
h
e
r
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
a
n
y
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
d
r
i
v
e
-
u
p
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
co
n
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
o
t
h
e
r
g
o
a
l
s
a
n
d
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
o
f
th
e
P
l
a
n
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
92
36
:
L
a
t
e
-
E
v
e
n
i
n
g
E
n
t
e
r
t
a
i
n
m
e
n
t
Ac
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
Di
s
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
l
a
t
e
-
e
v
e
n
i
n
g
e
n
t
e
r
t
a
i
n
m
e
n
t
ac
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
c
o
c
k
t
a
i
l
l
o
u
n
g
e
s
,
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
a
t
e
r
s
i
n
t
h
e
re
l
a
t
i
v
e
l
y
n
a
r
r
o
w
de
p
t
h
o
f
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
D
e
An
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
m
a
j
o
r
m
i
x
e
d
u
s
e
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
wh
e
r
e
t
h
e
y
a
b
u
t
l
o
w
-
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
S
u
c
h
.
A
l
l
o
w
l
a
t
e
-
ev
e
n
i
n
g
e
n
t
e
r
t
a
i
n
m
e
n
t
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
a
n
d
V
a
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
an
d
o
t
h
e
r
la
r
g
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
i
s
o
l
a
t
e
d
f
r
o
m
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
u
s
e
s
m
a
y
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
wi
t
h
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
w
h
e
n
t
h
e
en
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
w
a
y
f
r
o
m
se
n
s
i
t
i
v
e
r
e
c
e
p
t
o
r
s
/
u
s
e
s
a
n
d
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
pl
a
n
t
i
n
g
,
p
o
l
i
c
i
n
g
,
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
a
w
a
y
fr
o
m
s
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
e
r
e
c
e
p
t
o
r
s
a
r
e
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing Community Input
GO
A
L
E
:
Pr
o
m
o
t
e
t
T
hr
i
v
i
n
g
a
n
d
d
i
v
e
r
s
e
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
b
r
i
n
g
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
v
i
t
a
l
i
t
y
t
o
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
,
w
h
i
l
e
b
a
l
a
n
c
i
n
g
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
,
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
ch
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
38
3
7
:
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
Us
e
a
n
a
n
n
u
a
l
,
5
f
i
v
e
-y
e
a
r
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
,
fo
r
e
c
a
s
t
b
y
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
a
r
e
a
,
t
o
c
o
r
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
t
o
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’
s
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
.
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
fi
s
c
a
l
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
o
f
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
co
m
p
a
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
an
n
u
a
l
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
l
a
n
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
th
e
f
i
s
c
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
n
t
h
e
ci
t
y
’
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
5
f
i
v
e
-y
e
a
r
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
t
r
e
a
m
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
a
p
r
o
a
c
t
i
v
e
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
st
r
a
t
e
g
y
t
h
a
t
l
i
n
k
s
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
pr
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
o
f
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
u
s
e
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
6
0
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
sa
l
e
s
t
a
x
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
a
n
d
r
e
t
a
i
l
u
s
e
s
.
C
r
e
a
t
e
a
n
ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
t
a
f
f
a
n
d
b
u
d
g
e
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
:
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
Pl
a
n
.
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
a
n
d
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
P
l
a
n
(
E
D
S
P
)
t
o
s
e
r
v
e
a
s
th
e
f
r
a
m
e
w
o
r
k
f
o
r
g
u
i
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
l
e
v
e
r
a
g
i
n
g
pl
a
n
n
e
d
g
r
o
w
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
.
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
t
h
e
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
o
b
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
i
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
t
h
e
E
D
S
P
:
Su
r
v
e
y
a
n
d
a
n
a
l
y
z
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
vi
t
a
l
i
t
y
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
t
r
e
n
d
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
a
n
d
f
o
r
e
c
a
s
t
i
n
g
De
f
i
n
e
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
n
d
it
s
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
c
a
n
t
a
k
e
t
o
m
o
s
t
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
ut
i
l
i
z
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
a
t
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
s
f
o
r
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
at
t
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
w
o
r
k
f
o
r
c
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
(e
.
g
.
,
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
w
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
s
a
n
d
s
e
m
i
n
a
r
s
,
An
n
u
a
l
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
S
a
t
i
s
f
a
c
t
i
o
n
S
u
r
v
e
y
,
tr
a
d
e
s
h
o
w
s
,
e
t
c
.
)
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
k
e
y
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
pr
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
a
n
d
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
c
a
s
e
s
t
u
d
i
e
s
a
n
d
d
a
t
a
f
o
r
s
t
a
f
f
t
o
de
v
e
l
o
p
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
i
n
g
M
o
b
i
l
e
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
/
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
,
F
o
o
d
T
r
u
c
k
s
,
e
t
c
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
:
E
D
S
P
G
o
a
l
s
,
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
a
n
d
Ac
t
i
o
n
s
.
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
g
o
a
l
s
,
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
a
n
d
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
in
t
h
e
E
D
S
P
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
t
o
p
u
r
s
u
e
a
s
i
t
e
n
a
c
t
s
bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
r
e
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
,
e
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
,
a
n
d
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
ef
f
o
r
t
s
;
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
s
a
f
i
s
c
a
l
l
y
h
e
a
l
t
h
y
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
;
re
a
l
i
z
e
s
k
e
y
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
a
c
r
o
s
s
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
;
a
n
d
m
a
k
e
s
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
a
b
e
t
t
e
r
p
l
a
c
e
t
o
li
v
e
a
n
d
w
o
r
k
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
39
3
8
:
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
s
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
s
e
c
t
o
r
t
o
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
i
n
pa
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
s
w
i
t
h
n
o
n
p
r
o
f
i
t
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
to
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
a
n
d
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
6
1
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
40
3
9
:
N
e
w
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
a
n
d
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
Re
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
n
e
w
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
a
n
d
r
e
t
a
i
n
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
n
e
e
d
e
d
l
o
c
a
l
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
an
d
m
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
,
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
t
o
ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
v
i
t
a
l
i
t
y
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
ph
y
s
i
c
a
l
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
C
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
Co
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
t
o
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
g
r
o
w
t
h
,
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
an
d
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
h
a
t
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
Ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
41
4
0
:
M
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
S
t
r
e
a
m
l
i
n
e
d
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
P
e
r
m
i
t
Pr
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
a
n
d
t
i
m
e
l
y
r
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
s
,
w
h
i
l
e
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
qu
a
l
i
t
y
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
ci
t
y
fe
d
e
r
a
l
,
s
t
a
t
e
,
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
a
n
d
l
o
c
a
l
co
d
e
s
.
L
o
o
k
fo
r
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
s
,
b
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
v
e
t
o
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
s
,
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
p
o
s
i
t
i
v
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
t
a
l
l
l
e
v
e
l
s
o
f
r
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
, a
n
d
pr
o
v
i
d
e
ad
v
i
c
e
t
o
de
c
i
s
i
o
n
-
m
a
k
e
r
s
t
o
h
e
l
p
t
h
e
m
m
a
k
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
e
d
de
c
i
s
i
o
n
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
42
4
1
:
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
o
f
O
f
f
i
c
e
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
In
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
n
g
o
f
f
i
c
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
s
,
en
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
u
s
e
s
a
n
d
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
t
h
a
t
ge
n
e
r
a
t
e
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
,
s
u
c
h
as
l
o
c
a
l
s
a
l
e
s
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
,
c
a
p
t
u
r
i
n
g
p
o
i
n
t
o
f
s
a
l
e
in
t
e
r
n
e
t
t
r
a
n
s
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
t
o
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
ta
x
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
.
N
e
w
o
f
f
i
c
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
ex
c
e
e
d
i
n
g
5
0
,
0
0
0
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
6
2
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
o
n
l
y
i
f
o
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
o
r
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
be
n
e
f
i
t
s
a
r
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
43
4
2
:
C
o
n
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
o
f
Of
f
i
c
e
/
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
U
s
e
s
t
o
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
Ev
a
l
u
a
t
e
t
h
e
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
f
c
o
n
v
e
r
t
i
n
g
of
f
i
c
e
/
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
to
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
44
4
3
:
M
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
C
o
h
e
s
i
v
e
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
C
e
n
t
e
r
s
a
n
d
O
f
f
i
c
e
P
a
r
k
s
Co
h
e
s
i
v
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
a
n
d
o
f
f
i
c
e
pa
r
k
s
a
r
e
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
h
e
a
l
t
h
y
sa
l
e
s
t
a
x
b
a
s
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
a
n
d
t
o
r
e
t
a
i
n
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
e
x
i
s
ti
n
g
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
t
o
ex
p
a
n
d
i
n
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
t
o
c
h
a
n
g
i
n
g
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
tr
e
n
d
s
.
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’
s
m
a
j
o
r
r
e
t
a
i
l
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
ce
n
t
e
r
s
a
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
V
a
l
l
c
o
F
a
s
h
i
o
n
P
a
r
k
,
Th
e
M
a
r
k
e
t
p
l
a
c
e
a
n
d
P
o
r
t
a
l
P
l
a
z
a
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
,
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
V
i
l
l
a
g
e
,
t
h
e
O
a
k
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
Cr
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
A
r
e
a
;
t
h
e
of
f
i
c
e
p
a
r
k
s
a
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
V
a
l
l
c
o
(
N
o
r
t
h
o
f
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
2
8
0
)
,
N
o
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
an
d
B
u
b
b
R
o
a
d
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
w
i
t
h
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
o
r
q
u
a
s
i
-
p
u
b
l
i
c
co
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
t
o
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
s
o
m
e
o
r
a
l
l
of
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
o
n
a
s
i
t
e
i
n
t
h
e
s
e
a
r
e
a
s
w
i
l
l
be
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
d
o
n
a
c
a
s
e
b
y
c
a
s
e
b
a
s
i
s
t
o
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
i
f
t
h
e
y
a
r
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
t
o
t
h
e
ov
e
r
a
l
l
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
p
a
r
k
o
r
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
c
e
n
t
e
r
,
o
r
ot
h
e
r
w
i
s
e
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
b
e
l
o
w
a
n
d
/
o
r
m
e
e
t
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
.
Tw
o
-
t
h
i
r
d
s
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
/
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
q
u
a
r
e
fo
o
t
a
g
e
t
h
a
t
i
s
c
o
n
v
e
r
t
e
d
t
o
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
sh
a
l
l
b
e
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
t
o
m
a
j
o
r
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
(c
o
m
p
a
n
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
s
a
l
e
s
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
o
r
co
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
h
e
a
d
q
u
a
r
t
e
r
s
)
a
s
id
e
n
t
i
f
i
a
b
l
e
in
Ta
b
l
e
2
-
A:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
T
h
e
re
m
a
i
n
d
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
o
o
t
a
g
e
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
6
3
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
al
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
o
r
o
f
f
i
c
e
p
o
o
l
i
n
th
e
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
.
Th
e
C
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
u
s
e
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
w
h
e
n
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
f
ne
w
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
a
n
d
o
f
f
i
c
e
p
a
r
k
s
:
1.
I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
a
n
d
o
f
f
i
c
e
pa
r
k
s
in
t
o
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
p
a
t
t
e
r
n
by
:
•
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
i
n
g
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
pa
t
t
e
r
n
s
(
e
.
g
.
, c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
n
e
x
t
t
o
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
o
r
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
)
;
•
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
i
n
g
p
a
t
t
e
r
n
s
o
f
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
ma
s
s
i
n
g
,
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
s
a
n
d
h
e
i
g
h
t
;
a
n
d
•
E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
i
n
g
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
pa
t
t
e
r
n
s
b
o
u
n
d
e
d
b
y
v
i
s
i
b
l
e
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
or
m
a
n
-
m
a
d
e
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
a
pu
b
l
i
c
o
r
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
r
o
a
d
s,
c
r
e
e
k
s,
fr
e
e
w
a
y
s
, e
t
c
.
2.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
v
i
s
i
b
l
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
/
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
co
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
a
n
d
f
r
o
m
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
u
s
e
s
.
3.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
v
i
s
i
b
l
e
a
n
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
l
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
pa
r
k
/
p
l
a
z
a
o
r
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
a
r
e
a
.
4.
Or
i
e
n
t
a
c
t
i
v
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
p
a
c
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
pu
b
l
i
c
o
r
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
r
i
g
h
t
s
o
f
w
a
y
.
5.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
u
p
e
r
i
o
r
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
d
e
s
i
g
n
w
i
t
h
hi
g
h
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
a
n
d
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
.
6.
D
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
e
t
h
e
r
e
a
r
e
s
u
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
o
r
s
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
l
o
c
a
l
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
s
to
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
m
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
a
n
d
s
c
h
o
o
l
se
r
v
i
c
e
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
t
o
s
e
r
v
e
t
h
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
6
4
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
7.
S
h
o
w
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
i
s
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
y
ob
s
o
l
e
t
e
i
n
a
m
a
r
k
e
t
s
e
n
s
e
a
n
d
c
a
n
n
o
t
be
r
e
a
s
o
n
a
b
l
y
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
o
r
m
a
r
k
e
t
e
d
in
t
o
a
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
u
s
e
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
su
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
,
o
r
s
h
o
w
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
/
u
s
e
i
s
n
o
l
o
n
g
e
r
co
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
t
o
t
h
e
l
a
r
g
e
r
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
e
n
t
e
r
o
r
o
f
f
i
c
e
p
a
r
k
.
8.
S
h
o
w
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
c
a
n
re
a
s
o
n
a
b
l
y
s
t
a
n
d
a
l
o
n
e
a
s
a
s
e
l
f
-
su
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
t
h
a
t
i
s
o
t
h
e
r
w
i
s
e
co
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
an
d
u
s
e
s
.
9.
S
h
o
w
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
o
r
q
u
a
s
i
-
p
u
b
l
i
c
us
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
t
o
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
a
si
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
o
f
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
o
r
of
f
i
c
e
s
u
s
e
s
o
n
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
45
4
4
:
V
a
l
l
c
o
Sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
Re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
a
n
d
r
e
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
in
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
Sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Ar
e
a
a
s
a
d
i
s
t
i
n
c
t
i
v
e
,
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
,
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
e
n
t
e
r
t
a
i
n
m
e
n
t
c
e
n
t
e
r
,
w
i
t
h
ho
t
e
l
u
s
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
Ma
s
t
e
r
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
.
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
re
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
b
y
w
o
r
k
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
ow
n
e
r
o
r
a
M
a
s
t
e
r
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
R
e
t
e
n
a
n
t
i
n
g
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
.
Ac
t
i
v
e
l
y
e
n
g
a
g
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
b
r
o
k
e
r
a
g
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
t
o
r
e
t
e
n
a
n
t
t
h
e
v
a
c
a
n
c
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
ma
l
l
w
i
t
h
n
e
w
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
wi
t
h
t
h
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
f
o
r
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
Sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
6
5
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
46
4
5
:
I
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
f
o
r
R
e
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
f
o
r
r
e
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
h
e
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
M
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
.
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
(o
f
f
i
c
e
,
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
)
i
n
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
m
o
r
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
id
e
n
t
i
t
y
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
a
n
d
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
m
a
r
g
i
n
a
l
i
z
i
n
g
t
a
x
-
re
v
e
n
u
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
i
n
g
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
S
h
a
r
e
d
o
r
R
e
d
u
c
e
d
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
s
h
a
r
e
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
o
r
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
s
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
t
o
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
n
e
w
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
n
g
un
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
a
m
o
u
n
t
s
o
f
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
s
u
c
h
ar
e
a
s
a
s
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
aA
re
a
an
d
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
to
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
ar
e
a
a
s
a
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
-
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
,
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
vi
l
l
a
g
e
a
n
d
t
o
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
t
o
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
o
r
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
d
e
s
i
g
n
g
o
a
l
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
47
:
4
6
B
i
g
B
o
x
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
b
i
g
b
o
x
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
f
i
t
is
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
i
n
te
r
m
s
o
f
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
m
a
s
s
a
n
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
,
a
n
d
i
s
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
g
o
a
l
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
GO
A
L
F
:
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
Hh
il
l
s
i
d
e
s
a
n
d
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
48
4
7
:
H
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
St
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
Es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
fo
r
t
h
e
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
s
th
a
t
e
n
s
u
r
e
hi
l
l
s
i
d
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
6
6
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
s
.
Ap
p
l
y
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
s
t
h
a
t
l
i
m
i
t
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
n
r
i
d
g
e
l
i
n
e
s
,
h
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
ge
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
s
t
e
e
p
s
l
o
p
e
s
.
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
co
l
o
r
s
a
n
d
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
,
a
n
d
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
t
h
e
il
l
u
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
.
R
e
d
u
c
e
vi
s
i
b
l
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
m
a
s
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
s
u
c
h
m
e
a
n
s
a
s
st
e
p
p
i
n
g
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
d
o
w
n
t
h
e
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
,
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
t
h
e
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
c
o
n
t
o
u
r
s
,
a
n
d
l
i
m
i
t
i
n
g
th
e
h
e
i
g
h
t
a
n
d
m
a
s
s
o
f
t
h
e
w
a
l
l
p
l
a
n
e
f
a
c
i
n
g
th
e
v
a
l
l
e
y
f
l
o
o
r
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
S
l
o
p
e
-
dD
en
s
i
t
y
F
o
r
m
u
l
a
.
Ap
p
l
y
a
s
l
o
p
e
-
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
f
o
r
m
u
l
a
t
o
v
e
r
y
l
o
w
in
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
h
e
hi
l
l
s
i
d
e
s
.
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
th
e
f
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
m
o
d
i
f
i
e
d
,
f
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
m
o
d
i
f
i
e
d
1
/
2
a
c
r
e
an
d
t
h
e
5
-
2
0
a
c
r
e
s
l
o
p
e
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
f
o
r
m
u
l
a
e
.
Ac
t
u
a
l
l
o
t
s
i
z
e
s
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
z
o
n
i
n
g
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
,
cl
u
s
t
e
r
i
n
g
a
n
d
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
na
t
u
r
a
l
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
a
n
d
g
e
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
a
i
n
t
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
48
4
9
:
P
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
V
e
r
y
Lo
w
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
:,
S
e
m
i
-
R
u
r
a
l
5
-
A
c
r
e
Al
l
o
w
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
us
i
n
g
a
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
i
n
1
9
7
6
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
.
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
V
e
r
y
L
o
w
-
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
:
Se
m
i
-
R
u
r
a
l
5
-
A
c
r
e
S
l
o
p
e
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
F
o
r
m
u
l
a
a
s
de
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
a
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
e
1
9
7
6
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
fo
r
t
h
e
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
a
r
e
a
m
a
y
b
e
s
u
b
d
i
v
i
d
e
d
ut
i
l
i
z
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
f
o
r
m
u
l
a
.
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
su
b
d
i
v
i
d
e
d
i
n
c
o
n
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
V
e
r
y
L
o
w
-
De
n
s
i
t
y
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
:
S
e
m
i
-
R
u
r
a
l
5
-
A
c
r
e
S
l
o
p
e
De
n
s
i
t
y
F
o
r
m
u
l
a
h
a
v
e
n
o
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
s
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
6
7
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
f
o
r
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
50
4
9
:
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
L
e
g
a
l
L
o
t
s
i
n
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
Mo
d
i
f
i
e
d
a
n
d
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
M
o
d
i
f
i
e
d
1
/
2
-
a
c
r
e
Sl
o
p
e
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
Fo
r
l
o
t
s
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
L
a
n
d
Us
e
M
a
p
a
s
V
e
r
y
L
o
w
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
(
1
/
2
A
c
r
e
S
l
o
p
e
De
n
s
i
t
y
F
o
r
m
u
l
a
)
o
r
V
e
r
y
L
o
w
D
e
n
s
i
t
y
(
S
l
o
p
e
De
n
s
i
t
y
F
o
r
m
u
l
a
)
,
R
r
eq
u
i
r
e
d
i
s
c
r
e
t
i
o
n
a
r
y
re
v
i
e
w
o
f
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
o
r
R
1
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
i
f
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
o
n
s
u
b
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
pa
r
c
e
l
s
,
o
n
s
l
o
p
e
s
g
r
e
a
t
e
r
t
h
a
n
3
0
%
o
r
o
n
a
n
y
ot
h
e
r
a
r
e
a
s
w
h
e
r
e
s
t
u
d
i
e
s
h
a
v
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
th
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
c
e
o
f
h
e
a
l
t
h
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
E
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
R
e
v
i
e
w
t
h
e
s
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
e
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
pr
o
c
e
s
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
S
l
o
p
e
s
G
r
e
a
t
e
r
t
h
a
n
3
0
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
.
Fo
r
l
o
t
s
w
i
t
h
s
l
o
p
e
s
o
f
3
0
%
o
r
g
r
e
a
t
e
r
,
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
hi
l
l
s
i
d
e
f
a
c
t
o
r
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
,
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
a
n
d
ru
n
-
o
f
f
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
v
i
e
w
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
51
5
0
:
C
l
u
s
t
e
r
i
n
g
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
Su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
Cl
u
s
t
e
r
l
o
t
s
i
n
m
a
j
o
r
s
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
i
n
t
h
e
5
-
2
0
-
ac
r
e
s
l
o
p
e
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
,
a
n
d
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
cl
u
s
t
e
r
i
n
g
i
n
m
i
n
o
r
s
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
i
n
t
h
e
5
-
2
0
-
ac
r
e
s
l
o
p
e
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
R
e
s
e
r
v
e
9
0
%
o
f
t
h
e
l
a
n
d
i
n
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
t
o
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
t
h
e
u
n
i
q
u
e
ch
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
i
s
t
i
c
s
o
f
t
h
e
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
s
f
r
o
m
a
d
v
e
r
s
e
en
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
.
K
e
e
p
t
h
e
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
ar
e
a
c
o
n
t
i
g
u
o
u
s
a
s
m
u
c
h
a
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
52
5
1
:
R
u
r
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
in
H
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
A
r
e
a
s
Re
q
u
i
r
e
r
u
r
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
i
n
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
6
8
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
hi
l
l
s
i
d
e
a
r
e
a
s
t
o
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
t
h
e
r
u
r
a
l
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
o
f
th
e
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
M
a
s
s
G
r
a
d
i
n
g
i
n
N
e
w
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
F
o
l
l
o
w
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
l
a
n
d
c
o
n
t
o
u
r
an
d
a
v
o
i
d
m
a
s
s
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
i
n
n
e
w
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
e
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
l
y
i
n
f
l
o
o
d
h
a
z
a
r
d
o
r
hi
l
l
s
i
d
e
a
r
e
a
s
.
G
r
a
d
i
n
g
l
a
r
g
e
,
f
l
a
t
a
r
e
a
s
s
h
a
l
l
be
a
v
o
i
d
e
d
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
R
e
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
S
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
T
r
e
e
s
.
Re
t
a
i
n
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
s
p
e
c
i
m
e
n
t
r
e
e
s
,
e
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
l
y
wh
e
n
t
h
e
y
g
r
o
w
i
n
g
r
o
v
e
s
o
r
c
l
u
s
t
e
r
s
,
a
n
d
in
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
t
h
e
m
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
s
i
t
e
.
T
h
e
Mo
n
t
e
b
e
l
l
o
f
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
s
a
t
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
a
n
d
w
e
s
t
bo
u
n
d
a
r
i
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
v
a
l
l
e
y
f
l
o
o
r
a
r
e
a
s
c
e
n
i
c
ba
c
k
d
r
o
p
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
,
a
d
d
i
n
g
t
o
i
t
s
s
e
n
s
e
o
f
sc
a
l
e
a
n
d
v
a
r
i
e
t
y
o
f
c
o
l
o
r.
I
t
’
s
i
m
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
t
o
gu
a
r
a
n
t
e
e
a
n
u
n
o
b
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
v
i
e
w
o
f
t
h
e
h
i
l
l
s
fr
o
m
a
n
y
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
p
o
i
n
t
,
b
u
t
p
e
o
p
l
e
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
ab
l
e
t
o
s
e
e
t
h
e
f
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
s
f
r
o
m
p
u
b
l
i
c
g
a
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
pl
a
c
e
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
53
5
2
:
V
i
e
w
s
f
o
r
P
u
b
l
i
c
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
De
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
l
a
y
o
u
t
p
u
b
l
i
c
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
p
a
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
l
y
pu
b
l
i
c
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
s
,
s
o
t
h
e
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
v
i
e
w
s
o
f
th
e
f
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
s
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
n
e
a
r
b
y
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
,
an
d
p
l
a
n
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
vi
s
u
a
l
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
n
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
p
u
b
l
i
c
op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
N
e
a
r
P
u
b
l
i
c
O
p
e
n
Sp
a
c
e
.
R
e
m
o
v
e
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
s
a
n
d
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
i
t
e
s
a
s
f
a
r
a
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
f
r
o
m
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
bo
u
n
d
a
r
i
e
s
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
n
e
x
t
t
o
p
u
b
l
i
c
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
pr
e
s
e
r
v
e
s
a
n
d
p
a
r
k
s
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
a
n
d
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
p
l
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
an
i
m
a
l
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
54
5
3
:
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
Pl
a
n
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
6
9
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Hi
l
l
s
i
d
e
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
f
o
u
n
d
i
n
t
h
e
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
Co
u
n
t
y
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
a
d
o
p
t
e
d
i
n
1
9
9
4
a
r
e
in
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
b
y
re
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
a
n
d
a
r
e
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
t
o
t
h
e
un
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
a
r
e
a
.
T
h
e
s
e
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
ar
e
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
t
h
e
y
a
r
e
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
wi
t
h
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
g
o
a
l
s
.
I
f
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
a
r
e
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
p
l
a
n
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
in
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
go
a
l
s
,
t
h
e
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
s
h
o
u
l
d
p
r
o
t
e
s
t
t
h
o
s
e
ch
a
n
g
e
s
a
s
w
e
l
l
a
s
n
o
t
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
t
h
e
m
i
n
t
o
th
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
55
5
4
:
C
o
u
n
t
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
u
n
t
y
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
p
a
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
l
y
i
f
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
ne
a
r
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’
s
u
r
b
a
n
f
r
i
n
g
e
a
r
e
a
,
s
h
o
u
l
d
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’
s
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
5
8
:
D
e
A
n
z
a
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
Al
l
o
w
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
n
o
t
t
r
a
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
y
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
pa
r
t
o
f
a
c
o
l
l
e
g
e
t
o
b
e
b
u
i
l
t
a
t
D
e
A
n
z
a
Co
l
l
e
g
e
.
S
u
c
h
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
in
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
t
h
e
c
a
m
p
u
s
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
,
pr
o
v
i
d
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
n
o
t
o
f
f
e
r
e
d
i
n
th
e
c
i
t
y
o
r
a
l
l
e
v
i
a
t
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
c
r
e
a
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
co
l
l
e
g
e
.
GO
A
L
G
:
E
x
p
a
n
d
C
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
A
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Po
l
i
c
y
:
2
-
59
5
8
:
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
L
e
v
e
l
Re
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
t
h
a
t
i
f
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
d
e
s
i
r
e
s
a
hi
g
h
e
r
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
,
c
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
be
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
o
f
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
a
n
d
C
i
t
y
o
f
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
i
n
e
x
p
a
n
d
i
n
g
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
a
n
d
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
60
5
9
:
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
In
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
a
n
d
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
a
n
y
pu
b
l
i
c
li
b
r
a
r
y
fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
i
n
t
o
a
l
l
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
Pl
a
n
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
b
i
k
e
t
r
a
i
l
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
61
6
0
:
I
m
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
7
0
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
t
o
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
in
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
n
e
w
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
se
r
v
i
c
e
l
e
v
e
l
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
s
y
s
t
e
m
.
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
e
v
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
o
f
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
co
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
o
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
n
e
e
d
s
o
f
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
o
f
a
l
l
a
g
e
s
,
i
t
s
r
i
c
h
l
y
di
v
e
r
s
e
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
i
t
s
l
o
c
a
l
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
56
6
1
:
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
f
o
r
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
Re
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
t
h
e
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
o
f
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
n
t
h
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
’
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
t
a
f
f
a
n
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
Wo
r
k
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
sc
h
o
o
l
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
t
o
a
s
s
u
r
e
th
a
t
th
e
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
ex
c
e
l
l
ae
nc
e
o
f
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
ca
n
b
e
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
g
r
a
n
t
i
n
g
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
f
o
r
n
e
w
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
5
7
:
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
A
c
c
e
s
s
[
m
o
v
e
d
t
o
Ci
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
]
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
90
6
2
:
C
l
o
s
e
d
S
c
h
o
o
l
S
i
t
e
U
s
e
De
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
a
l
l
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
i
t
e
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
.
Si
t
e
s
m
a
y
b
e
u
s
e
d
f
o
r
q
u
a
s
i
-
p
u
b
l
i
c
o
r
in
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
o
r
b
o
t
h
,
o
r
f
o
r
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
.
Th
e
d
w
e
l
l
i
n
g
u
n
i
t
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
pa
t
t
e
r
n
s
h
a
l
l
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
t
h
e
c
h
a
r
a
c
t
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
su
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
.
T
h
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
o
f
un
u
s
e
d
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
i
t
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
a
l
s
o
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
pa
r
k
a
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
i
n
t
h
e
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
an
d
T
r
a
i
l
s
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
i
s
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
89
6
3
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
Q
u
a
s
i
-
P
u
b
l
i
c
Ac
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
Al
l
o
w
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
q
u
a
s
i
-
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
o
r
o
f
f
i
c
e
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
c
a
t
e
g
o
r
i
e
s
wi
t
h
z
o
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
u
s
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
:
1.
Th
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
m
u
s
t
h
a
v
e
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
m
s
,
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
,
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
,
n
o
i
s
e
an
d
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
a
s
t
h
e
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
c
a
t
e
g
o
r
i
e
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
7
1
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
2.
Th
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
m
u
s
t
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
i
n
t
e
r
f
a
c
e
i
n
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
o
n
s
b
y
o
f
f
e
r
i
ng
r
e
t
a
i
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
,
cr
e
a
t
i
n
g
a
s
t
o
r
e
f
r
o
n
t
a
p
p
e
a
r
a
n
c
e
o
r
ot
h
e
r
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
r
u
s
e
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
si
m
i
l
a
r
t
o
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
. C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
.
Am
e
n
d
th
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
z
o
n
i
n
g
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
pu
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
q
u
a
s
i
-
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
a
s
co
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
.
6
4
:
E
x
p
a
n
d
T
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
In
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
A
c
c
e
s
s
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
s
t
a
t
e
-
o
f
-
t
h
e
-
a
r
t
w
i
r
e
d
a
n
d
w
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
te
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
a
n
d
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
lo
c
a
l
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
,
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
,
v
i
s
i
t
o
r
s
a
n
d
st
u
d
e
n
t
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
.
Wo
r
k
w
i
t
h
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
to
a
n
d
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
a
w
i
d
e
r
a
n
g
e
o
f
s
t
a
t
e
-
o
f
-
th
e
-
a
r
t
t
e
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
a
n
d
se
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
h
o
u
s
e
h
o
l
d
s
,
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
,
in
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
s
,
a
n
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
P
e
r
i
o
d
i
c
Upd
a
t
e
s
.
W
h
e
n
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
,
re
q
u
i
r
e
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
t
o
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
p
e
r
m
i
t
r
e
n
e
w
a
l
s
i
f
n
e
w
e
r
te
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
a
l
l
o
w
s
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
b
e
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
i
n
si
z
e
,
s
c
a
l
e
o
r
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
o
r
a
l
l
o
w
s
t
h
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
to
b
e
b
e
t
t
e
r
s
c
r
e
e
n
e
d
/
c
a
m
o
u
f
l
a
g
e
d
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3.
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
Wo
r
k
w
i
t
h
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
t
o
e
x
p
a
n
d
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
to
a
r
e
a
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
n
o
t
s
e
r
v
e
d
b
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
A
p
p
l
y
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
7
2
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
te
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
i
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4.
E
x
p
a
n
d
T
e
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
Ac
c
e
s
s
a
t
P
u
b
l
i
c
P
l
a
c
e
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
ac
c
e
s
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
t
e
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
sy
s
t
e
m
s
a
n
d
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
i
n
p
u
b
l
i
c
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
5:
N
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
.
Hi
g
h
l
y
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
,
in
t
e
r
n
a
l
t
e
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
i
e
s
i
n
ne
w
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
6:
F
i
b
e
r
O
p
t
i
c
C
a
b
l
e
A
c
c
e
s
s
.
Su
p
p
o
r
t
t
h
e
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
a
n
d
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
fi
b
e
r
o
p
t
i
c
t
e
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
c
a
b
l
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
7:
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
H
o
t
S
p
o
t
s
.
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
wi
r
e
l
e
s
s
b
r
o
a
d
b
a
n
d
“
h
o
t
s
p
o
t
s
”
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
6
5
:
M
i
l
i
t
a
r
y
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
R
e
a
d
i
n
e
s
s
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
t
h
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
o
f
n
e
w
g
r
o
w
t
h
a
n
d
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
h
e
i
g
h
t
o
n
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
i
n
g
m
i
l
i
t
a
r
y
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
t
h
e
i
r
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
i
r
a
i
r
s
p
a
c
e
a
n
d
e
n
s
u
r
e
m
i
l
i
t
a
r
y
re
a
d
i
n
e
s
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Legal Requirement
GO
A
L
GH:
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
hi
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
l
y
a
n
d
a
r
c
h
a
e
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
l
y
s
i
g
n
if
i
c
a
n
t
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
,
s
i
t
e
s
a
n
d
a
r
t
i
f
a
c
t
s
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
62
A
6
6
:
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
S
i
t
e
s
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
o
n
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
S
i
t
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
Se
c
r
e
t
a
r
y
o
f
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
’
s
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
f
o
r
Tr
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
wi
t
h
Gu
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
f
o
r
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
i
n
g
,
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
n
g
,
an
d
R
e
s
t
o
r
i
n
g
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
an
d
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
p
l
a
q
u
e
,
r
e
a
d
e
r
b
o
a
r
d
a
n
d
/
o
r
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
7
3
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
ot
h
e
r
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
t
o
o
l
s
o
n
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
t
o
ex
p
l
a
i
n
t
h
e
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
o
f
t
h
e
re
s
o
u
r
c
e
(
s
)
.
T
h
e
p
l
a
q
u
e
s
h
a
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
se
a
l
,
n
a
m
e
o
f
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
,
d
a
t
e
i
t
w
a
s
b
u
i
l
t
,
a
wr
i
t
t
e
n
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
p
h
o
t
o
g
r
a
p
h
a
n
d
sh
a
l
l
b
e
p
l
a
c
e
d
i
n
a
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
w
h
e
r
e
t
h
e
pu
b
l
i
c
c
a
n
v
i
e
w
t
h
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
.
Fo
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
q
u
a
s
i
-
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
i
t
e
s
,
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
wi
t
h
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
t
o
al
l
o
w
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
c
c
e
s
s
o
f
th
e
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
s
i
t
e
t
o
f
o
s
t
e
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
w
a
r
e
n
e
s
s
an
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
.
F
o
r
pr
i
v
a
t
e
l
y
-
o
w
n
e
d
s
i
t
e
s
,
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
s
wo
u
l
d
sh
o
u
l
d
be
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
,
b
u
t
in
n
o
w
a
y
n
o
t
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
,
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
S
t
u
d
y
.
A
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
pr
o
p
o
s
i
n
g
t
o
d
e
m
o
l
i
s
h
o
r
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
l
y
a
l
t
e
r
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
(
s
)
m
o
r
e
t
h
a
n
4
5
y
e
a
r
s
o
l
d
,
c
i
t
y
st
a
f
f
s
h
a
l
l
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
i
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
co
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
s
i
t
e
-
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
st
u
d
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
.
U
p
o
n
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
t
h
a
t
a
s
i
t
e
-
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
s
t
u
d
y
i
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
,
t
h
e
s
t
u
d
y
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
a
q
u
a
l
i
f
i
e
d
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
u
r
a
l
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
a
n
me
e
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
S
e
c
r
e
t
a
r
y
o
f
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
’
s
St
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
f
o
r
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
o
r
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
Hi
s
t
o
r
y
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
62
B
6
7
:
C
o
m
m
e
m
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
i
t
e
s
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
o
n
C
o
m
m
e
m
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
S
i
t
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
pr
o
v
i
d
e
a
p
l
a
q
u
e
,
r
e
a
d
e
r
b
o
a
r
d
a
n
d
/
o
r
ot
h
e
r
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
t
o
o
l
o
n
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
t
o
e
x
p
l
a
i
n
th
e
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
.
T
h
e
pl
a
q
u
e
s
h
a
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
s
e
a
l
,
n
a
m
e
o
f
re
s
o
u
r
c
e
,
d
a
t
e
i
t
w
a
s
b
u
i
l
t
,
a
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
de
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
p
h
o
t
o
g
r
a
p
h
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
7
4
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
pl
a
c
e
d
i
n
a
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
w
h
e
r
e
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
c
a
n
vi
e
w
t
h
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
.
Fo
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
q
u
a
s
i
-
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
i
t
e
s
,
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
wi
t
h
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
th
e
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
s
i
t
e
t
o
f
o
s
t
e
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
w
a
r
e
n
e
s
s
an
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
.
F
o
r
pr
i
v
a
t
e
l
y
-
o
w
n
e
d
s
i
t
e
s
,
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
s
wo
u
l
d
sh
o
u
l
d
be
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
,
b
u
t
n
o
t
in
n
o
w
a
y
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
,
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
68
6
2
C
:
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
L
a
n
d
m
a
r
k
s
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
o
n
L
a
n
d
m
a
r
k
S
i
t
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
pl
a
q
u
e
,
r
e
a
d
e
r
b
o
a
r
d
a
n
d
/
o
r
o
t
h
e
r
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
to
o
l
s
o
n
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
t
o
e
x
p
l
a
i
n
t
h
e
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
si
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
c
e
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
.
T
h
e
p
l
a
q
u
e
s
h
a
l
l
in
c
l
u
d
e
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
s
e
a
l
,
n
a
m
e
o
f
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
,
d
a
t
e
i
t
wa
s
b
u
i
l
t
,
a
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
ph
o
t
o
g
r
a
p
h
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
p
l
a
c
e
d
i
n
a
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
wh
e
r
e
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
c
a
n
v
i
e
w
t
h
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
69
6
2
D
:
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
M
e
n
t
i
o
n
/
I
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
Si
t
e
s
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
t
h
a
t
h
a
v
e
j
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
o
v
e
r
th
e
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
t
o
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
re
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
a
n
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
pu
b
l
i
c
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
f
o
s
t
e
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
w
a
r
e
n
e
s
s
a
n
d
pr
o
v
i
d
e
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
o
pp
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
.
T
h
e
s
e
a
r
e
si
t
e
s
o
u
t
s
i
d
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
j
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
s,
b
u
t
h
a
v
e
co
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
p
a
s
t
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
62
E
7
0
:
I
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
f
o
r
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
of
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Th
e
C
i
t
y
s
h
o
u
l
d
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
a
v
a
r
i
e
t
y
o
f
te
c
h
n
i
q
u
e
s
t
o
s
e
r
v
e
a
s
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
t
o
w
a
r
d
fo
s
t
e
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
of
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
S
i
t
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
:
1.
Al
l
o
w
i
n
g
f
l
e
x
i
b
l
e
i
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
zo
n
i
n
g
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
n
o
t
e
s
s
e
n
t
i
a
l
t
o
p
u
b
l
i
c
he
a
l
t
h
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
T
h
i
s
c
o
u
l
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
7
5
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
fl
e
x
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
a
s
t
o
u
s
e
,
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
/
o
r
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
2.
Us
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
Hi
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
Co
d
e
f
o
r
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
;
3.
Ta
x
r
e
b
a
t
e
s
(
M
i
l
l
s
A
c
t
o
r
L
o
c
a
l
t
a
x
re
b
a
t
e
s
)
;
a
n
d
4.
Fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
g
r
a
n
t
s
/
l
o
a
n
s
to
a
s
s
i
s
t
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
62
F
7
1
:
R
e
c
o
g
n
i
z
i
n
g
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
An
i
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
o
f
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
l
l
y
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
sh
o
u
l
d
s
h
a
l
l
be
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
a
n
d
pe
r
i
o
d
i
c
a
l
l
y
u
p
d
a
t
e
d
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
aw
a
r
e
n
e
s
s
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Legal Requirement
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
72
6
3
:
A
r
c
h
a
e
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
l
y
S
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
e
Ar
e
a
s
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
a
r
c
h
a
e
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
l
y
s
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
e
a
r
e
a
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
.
Re
q
u
i
r
e
a
n
i
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
i
n
a
r
e
a
s
l
i
k
e
l
y
t
o
b
e
a
r
c
h
a
e
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
l
y
se
n
s
i
t
i
v
e
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
a
l
o
n
g
s
t
r
e
a
m
c
o
u
r
s
e
s
a
n
d
i
n
oa
k
g
r
o
v
e
s
,
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
i
f
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
ar
c
h
a
e
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
m
a
y
b
e
a
f
f
e
c
t
e
d
b
y
th
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
A
l
s
o
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
C
o
d
e
C
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
.
E
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
Ci
t
y
,
S
t
a
t
e
,
a
n
d
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
la
w
s
,
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
a
n
d
C
o
d
e
s
a
r
e
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
d
,
in
l
c
u
d
i
n
g
l
a
w
s
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
a
r
c
h
a
e
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
a
n
d
pa
l
e
o
n
t
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
,
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
e
ad
e
q
u
a
t
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
h
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
a
n
d
p
r
e
-
hi
s
t
o
r
i
c
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
7
6
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
64
7
3
:
N
a
t
i
v
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
B
u
r
i
a
l
s
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
N
a
t
i
v
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
b
u
r
i
a
l
s
i
t
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
U
p
o
n
di
s
c
o
v
e
r
y
o
f
s
u
c
h
b
u
r
i
a
l
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
ta
k
e
a
c
t
i
o
n
p
r
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
b
y
S
t
a
t
e
l
a
w
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
st
o
p
p
a
g
e
o
f
w
o
r
k
i
n
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
,
no
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
a
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
re
b
u
r
i
a
l
o
f
r
e
m
a
i
n
s
i
n
a
n
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
m
a
n
n
e
r
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
65
7
4
:
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
T
r
e
e
s
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
a
n
d
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
h
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
t
r
e
e
s
i
n
a
he
a
l
t
h
y
s
t
a
t
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
T
r
e
e
L
i
s
t
.
Es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
a
n
d
pe
r
i
o
d
i
c
a
l
l
y
r
e
v
i
s
e
a
h
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
t
r
e
e
l
i
s
t
t
h
a
t
in
c
l
u
d
e
s
t
r
e
e
s
o
f
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
c
e
t
o
t
h
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
GO
A
L
H
I
:
Pr
o
m
o
t
e
a
A
ci
v
i
c
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
w
h
e
r
e
t
h
e
a
r
t
s
e
x
p
r
e
s
s
a
n
i
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
v
e
s
p
i
r
i
t
,
ce
l
e
b
r
a
t
e
a
r
i
c
h
c
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
a
n
d
i
n
s
p
i
r
e
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
a
n
d
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
o
n
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
66
7
5
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
A
r
t
s
St
i
m
u
l
a
t
e
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
fo
r
t
h
e
a
r
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
co
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
v
e
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
l
o
c
a
l
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
an
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
Or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
1
/
4
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
S
e
t
-
a
s
i
d
e
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
a
n
d
a
d
o
p
t
a
O
n
e
-
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
¼
-
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
f
o
r
A
r
t
or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
,
w
h
i
c
h
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
s
e
t
a
s
i
d
e
.
2
5
%
wi
t
h
a
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
ca
p
of
t
h
e
i
r
t
o
t
a
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
b
u
d
g
e
t
f
o
r
o
n
-
s
i
t
e
a
r
t
,
wi
t
h
a
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
c
a
p
.
A
p
p
l
y
t
o
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
5
0
,
0
0
0
sq
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
a
n
d
l
a
r
g
e
r
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
P
r
o
m
o
t
e
A
r
t
.
P
r
o
m
o
t
e
v
i
s
i
b
l
e
ar
t
w
o
r
k
s
i
n
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
an
d
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
s
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
A
r
t
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
.
F
o
l
l
o
w
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
7
7
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Pu
b
l
i
c
A
r
t
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
t
o
a
s
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
r
t
i
s
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
l
y
s
c
a
l
e
d
an
d
f
i
t
s
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
c
o
n
t
e
x
t
o
f
i
t
s
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4
.
A
r
t
i
s
t
W
o
r
k
s
p
a
c
e
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
a
r
t
i
s
t
w
o
r
k
s
p
a
c
e
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
li
v
e
/
w
o
r
k
u
n
i
t
s
.
GO
A
L
I
J:
Cr
e
a
t
e
a
A
fu
l
l
r
a
n
g
e
o
f
p
a
r
k
a
n
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
,
f
o
r
l
i
n
k
i
n
g
th
a
t
l
i
n
k
th
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
,
pr
o
v
i
d
e
ou
t
d
o
o
r
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
,
preservation
of
pr
e
s
e
r
v
e
na
t
u
r
a
l
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
a
n
d
su
p
p
o
r
t
pu
b
l
i
c
h
e
a
l
t
h
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
67
7
6
:
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
P
a
r
k
Th
e
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
r
k
s
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
h
o
u
l
d
pu
r
s
u
e
t
h
e
g
o
a
l
o
f
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
n
g
u
p
p
e
r
a
n
d
lo
w
e
r
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
P
a
r
k
s
.
T
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
p
a
r
k
s
bu
d
g
e
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
p
u
r
s
u
e
a
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
ex
t
e
n
t
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
a
n
d
e
m
p
h
a
s
i
z
e
p
a
s
s
i
v
e
p
a
r
k
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
k
e
e
p
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
p
r
i
s
t
i
n
e
na
t
u
r
e
o
f
t
h
e
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
s
.
W
o
r
k
t
o
ke
e
p
r
e
t
a
i
l
th
e
wa
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
a
n
d
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
b
a
s
i
n
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
o
f
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
77
6
8
:
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
Ac
t
i
v
e
l
y
p
u
r
s
u
e
i
n
t
e
r
-
a
g
e
n
c
y
c
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
ac
q
u
i
r
i
n
g
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
n
e
a
r
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
e
r
n
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
ar
e
a
b
o
u
n
d
a
r
y
t
o
c
o
m
p
l
et
e
a
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
o
u
s
o
p
e
n
sp
a
c
e
g
r
e
e
n
b
e
l
t
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
l
o
w
e
r
f
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
s
a
n
d
to
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
t
h
e
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
t
o
t
h
e
t
r
a
i
l
s
y
s
t
e
m
an
d
t
h
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
69
7
8
:
F
u
t
u
r
e
U
s
e
o
f
B
l
a
c
k
b
e
r
r
y
Fa
r
m
Re
t
a
i
n
s
o
m
e
f
o
r
m
o
f
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
-
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
t
B
l
a
c
k
b
e
r
r
y
F
a
r
m
(
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
l
i
f
e
of
t
h
e
m
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
b
o
n
d
t
h
a
t
f
i
n
a
n
c
e
d
i
t
s
pu
r
c
h
a
s
e
)
a
s
t
h
e
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
e
d
f
r
o
m
no
n
-
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
t
o
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
u
s
e
.
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
p
a
r
k
a
c
r
e
a
g
e
,
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
t
h
e
fi
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
i
m
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
i
s
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
P
o
l
i
c
y
2
-
7
8
A
:
Bl
a
c
k
b
e
r
r
y
F
a
r
m
Ma
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
ni
n
g
E
f
f
o
r
t
s
f
o
r
P
a
r
k
s
. Pr
e
p
a
r
e
a
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
7
8
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
ma
s
t
e
r
p
l
a
n
f
o
r
B
l
a
c
k
b
e
r
r
y
F
a
r
m
,
R
e
v
i
e
w
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
s
o
l
i
c
i
t
b
r
o
a
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
c
o
n
j
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
a
n
y
P
a
r
k
s
a
n
d
Re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
m
a
s
t
e
r
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
P
u
r
s
u
e
th
e
p
o
s
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
o
p
e
r
t
i
n
g
a
l
l
p
a
r
k
s
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
sp
a
c
e
t
o
i
t
s
h
i
g
h
e
s
t
a
n
d
b
e
s
t
u
s
e
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
70
7
9
:
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
O
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
fo
r
Al
l
U
s
e
r
s
I
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
N
e
e
d
s
De
v
e
l
o
p
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
,
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
,
e
v
e
n
t
s
,
a
n
d
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
t
h
a
t
p
p
e
a
l
t
o
a
b
r
o
a
d
a
u
d
i
e
n
c
e
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
b
u
t
n
o
t
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
t
o
y
o
u
t
h
,
y
o
u
n
g
ad
u
l
t
s
,
s
e
n
i
o
r
s
,
a
n
d
g
r
o
u
p
s
o
f
v
a
r
y
i
n
g
et
h
n
i
c
i
t
i
e
s
,
b
a
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
s
,
a
n
d
a
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
A
l
s
o
pP
ro
v
i
d
e
m
o
r
e
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
al
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
sp
e
c
i
a
l
n
e
e
d
s
g
r
o
u
p
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
a
B
r
a
i
l
l
e
o
r
fr
a
g
r
a
n
c
e
p
a
r
k
f
o
r
t
h
e
b
l
i
n
d
,
a
n
d
w
h
o
l
l
y
ac
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
t
r
a
i
l
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
a
g
i
n
g
a
n
d
/
o
r
d
i
s
a
b
l
e
d
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
71
8
0
:
P
r
i
v
a
t
e
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
a
n
d
Re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
e
x
i
s
t
e
n
c
e
a
n
d
pr
o
f
i
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
a
n
d
re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
a
n
d
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
72
8
1
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
U
s
e
o
f
P
r
i
v
a
t
e
O
p
e
n
Sp
a
c
e
Se
e
k
c
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
l
a
n
d
o
w
n
e
r
s
f
o
r
pu
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
o
f
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
82
7
3
:
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
a
n
d
T
r
a
i
l
Li
n
k
a
g
e
s
De
d
i
c
a
t
e
o
r
a
c
q
u
i
r
e
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
l
a
n
d
s
a
n
d
t
r
a
i
l
li
n
k
a
g
e
s
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
f
o
r
a
mo
r
e
w
a
l
k
a
b
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
.
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
th
e
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
to
de
v
e
l
o
p
a
C
i
t
y
t
r
a
i
l
/
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
l
i
n
k
a
g
e
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
7
9
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
be
t
w
e
e
n
m
a
j
o
r
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
,
em
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
,
th
e
H
e
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
,
an
d
m
a
j
o
r
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
a
r
e
a
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
T
r
a
i
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
t
r
a
i
l
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
i
n
t
h
i
s
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
.
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
an
y
s
a
f
e
t
y
,
s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
a
n
d
p
r
i
v
a
c
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
a
n
d
mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
r
a
i
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
Wo
r
k
w
i
t
h
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
p
u
t
f
r
o
m
a
f
f
e
c
t
e
d
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
i
n
l
o
c
a
t
i
n
g
t
r
a
i
l
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
D
e
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
T
r
a
i
l
s
o
r
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Re
q
u
i
r
e
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
t
r
a
i
l
s
,
a
s
we
l
l
a
s
t
h
e
i
r
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
,
w
h
e
r
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4
.
J
o
i
n
t
U
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
Es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
a
Jo
i
n
t
U
s
e
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
(s
)
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
Va
l
l
e
y
W
a
t
e
r
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
th
a
t
s
e
t
s
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
a
n
d
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
f
o
r
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
f
o
r
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
c
r
e
e
k
t
r
a
i
l
s
fo
r
t
r
a
i
l
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
j
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
5
.
F
l
e
x
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
i
n
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
al
l
o
w
i
n
g
f
l
e
x
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
i
n
d
e
s
i
g
n
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
w
h
e
n
th
e
r
e
i
s
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
o
p
e
n
sp
a
c
e
a
n
d
t
r
a
i
l
l
i
n
k
a
g
e
s
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
t
o
b
e
a
s
u
b
s
t
a
n
t
i
a
l
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
be
n
e
f
i
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
6
.
T
r
a
i
l
D
e
s
i
g
n
.
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
t
h
e
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
f
a
c
t
o
r
s
w
h
e
n
d
e
s
i
g
n
i
n
g
t
r
a
i
l
s
:
Su
p
p
o
r
t
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
i
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
v
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
pr
a
c
t
i
c
e
s
,
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
,
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
i
t
o
n
te
c
h
n
i
q
u
e
s
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
,
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
o
f
t
r
a
i
l
s
;
Mi
n
i
m
i
z
e
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
d
i
s
t
u
r
b
a
n
c
e
i
n
th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
r
a
i
l
s
;
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
i
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
i
v
e
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
8
0
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
si
g
n
a
g
e
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
r
t
,
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
al
o
n
g
t
r
a
i
l
s
t
o
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
u
s
e
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
th
e
u
s
e
r
e
x
p
e
r
i
e
n
c
e
;
a
n
d
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
,
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
a
n
d
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
t
h
a
t
e
x
p
a
n
d
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
ab
o
u
t
,
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
u
s
e
o
f
,
a
n
d
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
tr
a
i
l
s
a
s
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
74
8
3
:
P
a
r
k
A
c
r
e
a
g
e
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
p
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
e
q
u
a
l
t
o
a
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
o
f
t
h
r
e
e
ac
r
e
s
f
o
r
e
a
c
h
l
,
0
0
0
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
75
8
4
:
P
a
r
k
W
a
l
k
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
En
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
e
a
c
h
h
o
u
s
e
h
o
l
d
i
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
a
h
a
l
f
-
mi
l
e
w
a
l
k
o
f
a
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
p
a
r
k
,
o
r
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
p
a
r
k
w
i
t
h
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
an
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
r
o
u
t
e
i
s
r
e
a
s
o
n
a
b
l
y
f
r
e
e
o
f
ph
y
s
i
c
a
l
b
a
r
r
i
e
r
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
w
i
t
h
h
e
a
v
y
tr
a
f
f
i
c
.
W
h
e
r
e
v
e
r
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
li
n
k
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
p
a
r
k
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
76
8
5
:
P
a
r
k
V
a
r
i
e
t
y
Pl
a
n
f
o
r
p
a
r
k
u
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
f
o
r
a
v
a
r
i
e
t
y
o
f
re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
77
8
6
:
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
Re
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
t
h
e
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
t
o
e
a
c
h
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
p
a
r
k
,
s
o
th
a
t
f
u
t
u
r
e
p
a
r
k
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
c
a
n
b
e
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
de
s
i
r
e
d
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
o
f
u
s
e
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
78
8
7
:
P
a
r
k
M
i
n
i
m
u
m
A
c
r
e
a
g
e
Pl
a
n
p
a
r
k
s
t
o
b
e
a
t
l
e
a
s
t
3
.
5
a
c
r
e
s
f
o
r
fl
e
x
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
u
s
e
.
T
h
e
a
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
p
a
r
k
s
l
e
s
s
t
h
a
n
3
.
5
a
c
r
e
s
ma
y
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
a
c
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
t
o
t
h
e
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
:
Hi
g
h
P
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
-
De
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
t
h
a
t
h
a
v
e
n
o
p
a
r
k
o
r
re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
r
e
a
s
.
Mo
d
e
r
a
t
e
P
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
-
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
8
1
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
t
h
a
t
h
a
v
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
gr
o
u
n
d
s
a
n
d
n
o
p
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
.
Lo
w
P
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
-
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
t
h
a
t
h
a
v
e
p
a
r
k
o
r
re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
r
e
a
s
l
e
s
s
t
h
a
n
t
h
r
e
e
a
c
r
e
s
pe
r
1
,
0
0
0
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
.
Ac
c
e
s
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
t
o
p
a
r
k
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
i
n
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
i
n
g
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
.
I
n
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
sm
a
l
l
e
r
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
l
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
po
c
k
e
t
p
a
r
k
s
i
n
n
e
w
a
n
d
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
d
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
a
n
d
n
e
w
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
r
e
s
p
i
t
e
a
n
d
g
a
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
pl
a
c
e
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
79
8
8
:
P
a
r
k
D
e
s
i
g
n
De
s
i
g
n
p
a
r
k
s
t
o
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
t
h
e
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
a
n
d
to
p
o
g
r
a
p
h
y
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
a
n
d
t
o
k
e
e
p
l
o
n
g
-
t
e
r
m
ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
c
o
s
t
s
l
o
w
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
N
a
t
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
t
s
.
M
a
x
i
m
i
z
e
t
h
e
u
s
e
of
n
a
t
i
v
e
p
l
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
w
a
t
e
r
u
s
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
Cr
e
e
k
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
. W
h
e
r
e
po
s
s
i
b
l
e
,
o
p
e
n
a
n
d
r
e
s
t
o
r
e
c
o
v
e
r
e
d
c
r
e
e
k
s
a
n
d
ri
p
a
r
i
a
n
h
a
b
i
t
a
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
D
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
G
a
r
d
e
n
s
.
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
th
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
d
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
g
a
r
d
e
n
s
i
n
so
m
e
p
a
r
k
s
w
h
e
r
e
f
e
a
s
i
b
l
e
a
s
a
m
e
t
h
o
d
o
f
ed
u
c
a
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
o
n
s
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
t
e
c
h
n
i
q
u
e
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
80
8
9
:
P
a
r
k
A
c
c
e
s
s
a
n
d
V
i
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
Pa
r
k
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
sa
f
e
t
y
b
y
p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g
v
i
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
a
n
d
ac
c
e
s
s
b
y
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
e
r
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
81
9
0
:
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
S
u
r
p
l
u
s
S
c
h
o
o
l
Pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
A
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
f
e
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
h
e
l
d
i
n
re
s
e
r
v
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
a
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
u
r
p
l
u
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
8
2
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
sc
h
o
o
l
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
i
f
t
h
e
y
b
e
c
o
m
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
.
Th
e
C
i
t
y
s
h
o
u
l
d
t
a
k
e
a
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
o
f
t
h
e
N
a
y
l
o
r
Ac
t
t
o
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
s
u
r
p
l
u
s
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
i
t
e
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
82
9
1
:
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
Ac
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
De
v
e
l
o
p
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
P
a
r
k
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
,
b
a
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
p
a
r
k
s
a
s
ou
t
l
i
n
e
d
i
n
T
a
b
l
e
2
-
C
.
T
h
e
P
a
r
k
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
i
s
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
b
a
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
t
h
r
e
e
b
r
o
a
d
ac
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
:
1.
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
P
a
r
k
s
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
i
n
t
h
o
s
e
a
r
e
a
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
p
a
r
k
de
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
.
2.
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
i
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
o
f
sp
o
r
t
s
f
i
e
l
d
s
.
3.
Re
t
a
i
n
c
r
e
e
k
s
i
t
e
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
a
r
e
a
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
83
9
2
:
A
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
o
r
D
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
s
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
s
a
r
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
a
n
d
s
h
a
l
l
be
a
c
q
u
i
r
e
d
o
r
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
R
a
n
c
h
o
Ri
n
c
o
n
a
d
a
a
r
e
a
,
i
n
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
a
r
e
a
,
a
n
d
i
n
th
e
a
r
e
a
n
o
r
t
h
o
f
I
-
2
8
0
n
e
a
r
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
de
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
w
h
e
n
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
n
e
w
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
u
n
i
t
s
ar
e
id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
t
o
m
e
e
t
S
t
a
t
e
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
84
9
3
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
P
l
a
y
i
n
g
F
i
e
l
d
s
Pr
e
s
e
r
v
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
p
l
a
y
i
n
g
f
i
e
l
d
s
f
o
r
s
c
h
o
o
l
a
n
d
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
S
c
h
o
o
l
E
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
sc
h
o
o
l
s
t
o
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
i
r
e
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
n
e
e
d
s
b
y
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
u
p
w
a
r
d
i
n
s
t
e
a
d
o
f
o
u
t
w
a
r
d
i
n
t
o
re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
f
i
e
l
d
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
S
c
h
o
o
l
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
t
s
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
sc
h
o
o
l
s
t
o
s
e
e
k
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
o
r
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
No Change
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
8
3
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
s
,
r
a
t
h
e
r
t
h
a
n
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
ne
w
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
s
t
h
a
t
i
n
f
r
i
n
g
e
o
n
p
l
a
y
i
n
g
f
i
e
l
d
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
85
9
4
:
Pa
r
k
a
n
d
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
Re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
Ne
w
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
U
r
b
a
n
C
o
r
e
A
r
e
a
s
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
p
a
r
k
a
n
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
s
p
a
c
e
a
n
d
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
n
e
w
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
th
e
u
r
b
a
n
c
o
r
e
.
T
h
e
n
e
e
d
f
o
r
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
pu
b
l
i
c
p
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
a
n
d
t
h
e
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
o
f
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
s
p
a
c
e
a
n
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
w
h
e
n
a
m
a
s
t
e
r
p
l
a
n
i
s
su
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
,
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
:
1.
Wh
e
r
e
f
e
a
s
i
b
l
e
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
a
r
k
s
p
a
c
e
,
a
s
op
p
o
s
e
d
t
o
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
,
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
.
A
c
t
i
v
e
p
a
r
k
a
r
e
a
s
a
r
e
en
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
t
h
a
t
w
i
l
l
s
e
r
v
e
t
h
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
n
e
e
d
.
P
a
s
s
i
v
e
a
r
e
a
s
a
r
e
ac
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
,
w
h
e
n
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
t
o
a
n
ur
b
a
n
s
e
t
t
i
n
g
.
F
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
c
o
u
l
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
pa
t
h
s
,
b
e
n
c
h
e
s
,
w
a
t
e
r
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
,
p
i
c
n
i
c
ta
b
l
e
s
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
r
t
,
t
r
e
e
s
a
n
d
g
a
r
d
e
n
s
.
Th
e
y
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
o
r
i
e
n
t
e
d
t
o
w
a
r
d
t
h
e
st
r
e
e
t
o
r
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
a
r
e
a
w
h
e
r
e
i
t
i
s
ea
s
i
l
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
t
o
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
.
P
a
s
s
i
v
e
ar
e
a
s
d
e
e
m
e
d
i
n
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
o
r
u
n
l
i
k
e
l
y
t
o
be
u
s
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
h
o
u
l
d
n
o
t
b
e
cr
e
d
i
t
e
d
t
o
w
a
r
d
p
a
r
k
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
i
n
g
p
u
b
l
i
c
t
r
a
i
l
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
m
a
y
be
g
i
v
e
n
p
a
r
t
i
a
l
c
r
e
d
i
t
t
o
w
a
r
d
p
a
r
k
de
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
2.
Wh
e
r
e
f
e
a
s
i
b
l
e
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
a
r
k
a
n
d
re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
f
o
r
t
h
o
s
e
w
h
o
l
i
v
e
a
n
d
w
o
r
k
i
n
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
3.
Ne
w
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
be
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
t
o
b
l
e
n
d
t
h
e
i
r
re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
t
l
a
r
g
e
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
8
4
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
4.
Pa
r
k
f
e
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
a
f
o
r
m
u
l
a
t
h
a
t
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
s
t
h
e
e
x
t
e
n
t
t
o
wh
i
c
h
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
/
o
r
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
p
a
r
k
sp
a
c
e
a
n
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
n
e
e
d
.
Po
l
i
c
y
2
-
86
9
5
:
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Re
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
d
e
r
i
v
e
d
f
r
o
m
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
s
u
c
h
as
gy
m
n
a
s
i
u
m
s
,
s
w
i
m
m
i
n
g
p
o
o
l
s
an
d
/
o
r
t
e
n
n
i
s
c
o
u
r
t
s
a
n
d
w
o
r
k
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
t
h
e
s
e
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
s
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
s
c
h
o
o
l
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
s
ma
x
i
m
i
z
e
d
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
S
a
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
A
p
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
8
5
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
Ci
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
Th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
t
a
b
l
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
C
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
p
o
l
i
c
y
a
n
d
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
2
0
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
A
,
B
a
n
d
C
.
T
h
e
2
0
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
a
r
e
s
h
o
w
n
i
n
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
c
o
l
u
m
n
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
t
h
e
s
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
r
e
f
lect the
mi
n
i
m
u
m
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
p
o
l
i
c
y
u
p
d
a
t
e
s
e
n
v
i
s
i
o
n
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
(
e
.
g
.
,
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
,
l
e
g
a
l
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y
/
e
d
i
t
o
r
i
a
l
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
)
.
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
GO
A
L
A
:
Ad
v
o
c
a
t
e
f
o
r
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
D
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
s
t
h
a
t
Su
p
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
C
o
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
N
e
e
d
s
o
f
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
Po
l
i
c
y
4
-
1
:
C
i
t
y
P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
a
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
i
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
a
p
p
r
oa
c
h
e
s
t
o
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
n
e
e
d
s
o
f
t
h
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
V
a
l
l
e
y
.
W
o
r
k
c
l
o
s
e
l
y
w
i
th
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
i
n
g
j
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
fo
r
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
s
,
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
nd
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
i
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
.
P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
i
n
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
mi
n
i
m
i
z
e
a
d
v
e
r
s
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’
s
c
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
.
W
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
a
l
l
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
ag
e
n
c
i
e
s
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
g
o
al
s
a
n
d
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
o
f
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’
s
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
.
W
o
r
k
wi
t
h
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
i
n
g
c
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
a
d
d
r
e
ss
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
l
a
n
d
us
e
i
s
s
u
e
s
o
f
m
u
t
u
a
l
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
J
o
b
s
–
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
.
M
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
t
r
a
ff
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
b
y
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
t
o
m
a
n
a
g
e
t
h
e
j
o
b
s
-
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
b
a
la
n
c
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
a
n
d
t
h
e
S
i
l
i
c
o
n
Va
l
l
e
y
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
B
a
y
A
r
e
a
r
e
g
i
o
n
’
s
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
C
o
mm
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
a
n
d
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3.
I
n
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
i
n
t
e
r
c
h
a
n
g
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
I
-
2
8
0
w
i
t
h
th
e
L
a
w
r
e
n
c
e
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
w
a
y
an
d
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
an
d
N
o
r
t
h
W
o
l
f
e
R
o
a
d
,
t
h
a
t
w
o
u
l
d
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
th
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
f
r
e
e
w
a
y
a
n
d
r
e
d
u
c
e
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4.
C
o
n
g
e
s
t
i
o
n
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
(
C
M
P
)
.
A
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
i
n
t
h
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
C
M
P
a
n
d
ot
h
e
r
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
t
o
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
c
o
n
g
e
s
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
l
i
m
i
t
a
i
r
p
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
5.
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
I
m
p
a
c
t
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
(
T
I
A
)
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
T
I
A
r
e
p
o
r
t
s
t
h
a
t
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
Sa
n
t
a
Cl
a
r
a
V
a
l
l
e
y
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
(
VT
A
) f
o
r
a
l
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
t
o
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
m
o
r
e
t
h
a
n
1
0
0
tr
i
p
s
i
n
t
h
e
m
o
r
n
i
n
g
o
r
a
f
t
e
r
n
o
o
n
p
e
a
k
h
o
u
r
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
6.
M
u
l
t
i
-
m
o
d
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
E
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
c
o
nn
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
t
o
e
n
a
b
l
e
t
r
a
v
e
l
e
r
s
t
o
tr
a
n
s
i
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
o
n
e
m
o
d
e
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
a
n
o
t
h
e
r
, (
e.
g
.
,
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
t
o
b
u
s
).
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
7.
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
B
u
s
a
n
d
R
a
p
i
d
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
.
S
u
pp
o
r
t
t
h
e
e
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
V
T
A
’
s
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
b
u
s
tr
a
n
s
i
t
s
y
s
t
e
m
a
n
d
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
b
u
s
a
n
d
/
o
r
l
i
g
h
t
r
a
il
r
a
p
i
d
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
a
n
d
D
e
A
n
z
a
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
8
6
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Co
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
t
o
f
u
l
f
i
l
l
t
h
e
“
s
p
o
k
e
a
n
d
wh
e
e
l
”
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
s
y
s
t
e
m
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
t
o
s
e
r
v
e
a
l
l
o
f
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
.
Sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
i
s
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
a
r
e
:
Re
v
i
e
w
a
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
a
i
n
t
s
t
o
r
a
p
i
d
tr
a
n
s
i
t
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
h
i
g
h
e
r
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
a
n
d
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
pm
e
n
t
i
n
r
a
p
i
d
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
a
n
d
e
n
s
u
r
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
a
r
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
.
Se
e
k
t
h
e
c
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
v
e
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
o
f
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
,
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
s
a
n
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
i
n
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
r
a
p
i
d
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
ex
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
s
.
Ac
t
i
v
e
l
y
s
e
e
k
t
o
h
a
v
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
W
e
s
t
V
a
ll
e
y
c
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
u
l
t
i
m
a
t
e
l
y
c
h
a
i
r
t
h
e
V
T
A
B
o
a
r
d
o
f
Di
r
e
c
t
o
r
s
t
o
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
t
h
e
a
b
o
v
e
p
o
l
i
c
y
.
GO
A
L
B
:
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
th
e
Us
e
o
f
P
u
b
l
i
c
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
,
C
a
r
p
o
o
l
s
,
B
i
cy
c
l
i
n
g
,
W
a
l
k
i
n
g
a
n
d
T
e
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
t
i
n
g
Po
l
i
c
y
4-
2
2
-
7
:
D
e
f
i
n
e
d
a
n
d
B
a
l
a
n
c
e
d
C
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
De
f
i
n
e
t
h
e
c
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
a
s
a
h
i
e
r
a
r
c
h
y
o
f
st
r
e
e
t
w
i
d
t
h
s
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
ur
b
a
n
t
o
r
u
r
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
t
o
ar
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
s
y
s
t
e
m
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
a
u
t
o
m
o
bi
l
e
a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
/
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
n
e
e
d
s
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
th
e
n
e
e
d
s
o
f
v
a
r
y
i
n
g
m
o
d
e
s
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
a
l
l
u
s
e
r
s
w
h
e
n
d
e
s
i
g
n
i
n
g
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
s
y
s
t
e
m
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
4
-
23
:
R
e
d
u
c
e
d
R
e
l
i
a
n
c
e
o
n
t
h
e
U
s
e
o
f
S
i
n
g
l
e
-
O
c
c
u
p
a
n
t
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
Pr
o
m
o
t
e
a
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
d
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
r
e
l
i
a
n
c
e
o
n
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
,
m
o
st
l
y
s
i
n
g
l
e
-
o
c
c
u
p
a
n
t
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
(
S
O
V
)
b
y
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
i
n
g
at
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
S
O
V
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
S
O
V
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
c
a
r
-
po
o
l
i
n
g
,
u
s
e
o
f
p
u
b
l
i
c
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
,
b
i
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
(
TS
M
) P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
T
S
M
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
f
o
r
em
p
l
o
y
e
e
s
i
n
b
o
t
h
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
s
e
c
t
o
r
s
b
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
p
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
f
o
r
c
a
r
p
o
o
l
s
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g
bu
s
p
a
s
s
e
s
,
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
i
n
g
c
o
m
p
r
e
s
s
e
d
w
o
r
k
w
e
e
k
s
,
a
n
d
pr
o
v
i
d
i
n
g
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
a
n
d
r
e
w
a
r
d
s
f
o
r
b
i
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
wa
l
k
i
n
g
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3.
T
e
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
t
i
n
g
,
T
e
l
e
c
o
n
f
e
r
e
n
c
i
n
g
a
n
d
Ot
h
e
r
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
i
c
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
em
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
t
o
u
s
e
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
n
e
t
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
c
o
m
m
u
t
e
t
r
a
ve
l
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
,
p
a
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
l
y
a
t
t
h
e
c
o
l
l
e
g
e
an
d
h
i
g
h
s
c
h
o
o
l
l
e
v
e
l
s
,
t
o
m
a
k
e
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
in
t
e
r
n
e
t
t
o
l
i
m
i
t
t
h
e
n
e
e
d
t
o
t
r
a
v
e
l
t
o
a
n
d
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
ca
m
p
u
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4.
D
e
s
i
g
n
o
f
N
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
n
e
w
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
h
a
r
e
d
of
f
i
c
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
c
a
f
e
t
e
r
i
a
s
,
d
a
y
-
c
a
r
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
l
u
n
c
hr
o
o
m
s
,
s
h
o
w
e
r
s
,
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
,
h
o
m
e
o
f
f
i
c
e
s
,
s
h
u
t
t
l
e
bu
s
e
s
t
o
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
t
h
a
t
en
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
,
b
i
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
,
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
o
r
te
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
t
i
n
g
a
s
c
o
m
m
u
t
e
m
o
d
e
s
t
o
w
o
r
k
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
p
a
t
h
w
a
ys
a
n
d
o
r
i
e
n
t
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
t
o
t
h
e
st
r
e
e
t
t
o
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
5.
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
p
a
c
e
f
o
r
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
p
a
c
e
o
n
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
f
o
r
b
u
s
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Community Input Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
8
7
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
tu
r
n
o
u
t
s
,
o
r
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
b
i
k
e
l
a
n
e
s
o
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
p
a
t
h
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
6.
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
.
U
s
e
th
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
S
c
e
n
e
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
m
e
d
i
a
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
o
n
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
S
O
V
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
7.
C
i
t
i
z
e
n
P
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
o
n
.
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
to
w
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
/
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
Ad
v
i
s
o
r
y
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
,
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
g
r
o
u
p
s
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
t
o
e
li
m
i
n
a
t
e
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
a
n
d
b
a
r
r
i
e
r
s
t
o
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
an
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
8
.
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
D
e
m
a
n
d
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
(
T
D
M
)
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
l
a
r
g
e
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
an
d
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
T
D
M
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
t
h
e
ve
h
i
c
l
e
t
r
i
p
s
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
i
r
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
s
.
Wo
r
k
t
o
g
e
t
h
e
r
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
l
a
r
g
e
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
t
r
a
c
k
i
n
g
s
y
s
t
e
m
f
o
r
t
h
e
T
D
M
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
t
o
a
l
l
o
w
on
g
o
i
n
g
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
o
f
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
.
GO
A
L
C
:
Cr
e
a
t
e
a
A
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
N
e
t
w
o
r
k
o
f
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
R
o
u
t
e
s
a
n
d
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
Po
l
i
c
y
4
-
43
:
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
d P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
C
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
T
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
a
n
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Gu
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
a
n
d
i
n
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
,
a
s
w
e
l
l
a
s
o
t
h
e
r
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
t
h
i
s
go
a
l
.
E
x
p
a
n
d
th
e
ci
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
ne
t
w
o
r
k
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
,
mo
b
i
l
i
t
y
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
T
h
e
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Gu
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
P
l
a
n
.
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Gu
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
P
l
a
n
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
:
Af
t
e
r
e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
r
e
v
i
e
w
,
a
n
d
w
h
e
r
e
f
o
u
n
d
t
o
b
e
f
e
a
s
i
b
le
,
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
a
t
s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
b
y
on
e
o
r
m
o
r
e
o
f
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
:
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
r
i
g
h
t
-
t
u
r
n
-
o
n
-r
e
d
,
a
d
d
t
i
m
e
t
o
t
h
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
i
g
n
a
l
p
h
a
s
e
,
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
m
e
d
i
a
n
a
n
d
/
o
r
r
e
d
u
c
e
c
o
r
n
e
r
r
a
d
i
i
.
Wh
e
r
e
f
e
a
s
i
b
l
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
m
i
s
s
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
o
n
a
r
t
e
ri
a
l
a
n
d
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
n
d
o
n
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
st
r
e
e
t
s
a
s
d
e
s
i
r
e
d
b
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
a
c
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
g
r
i
d
i
n
cl
u
d
i
n
g
s
h
o
r
t
c
u
t
s
,
p
a
t
h
w
a
y
s
a
n
d
b
r
i
d
g
e
s
,
w
h
e
r
e
ne
e
d
e
d
,
t
o
c
l
o
s
e
g
a
p
s
i
n
t
h
e
p
e
de
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
G
r
i
d
.
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
a
q
u
a
rt
e
r
-
m
i
l
e
g
r
i
d
o
f
s
a
f
e
,
w
a
l
k
-
a
b
l
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
a
n
d
pa
t
h
s
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
c
e
s
s
a
m
o
n
g
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l,
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
,
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3.
Sa
f
e
R
o
u
t
e
s
t
o
Sc
h
o
o
l
s.
W
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s t
o
pr
o
m
o
t
e
t
h
e
S
a
f
e
R
o
u
t
e
t
o
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
pr
o
g
r
a
m
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
s
t
u
d
e
n
t
s
t
o
w
a
lk
,
b
i
k
e
,
o
r
c
a
r
p
o
o
l
t
o
s
c
h
o
o
l
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4.
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
T
i
m
e
o
n
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
i
g
n
a
l
s
.
W
i
t
h
en
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
r
e
v
i
e
w
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
t
i
m
e
f
o
r
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
t
o
c
r
o
s
s
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
t
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
ti
o
n
s
.
A
d
d
e
d
t
i
m
e
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
m
o
s
t
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
n
e
a
r
sh
o
p
p
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
,
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
a
n
d
s
e
n
i
o
r
c
i
t
i
z
e
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
.
T
h
i
s
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
e
v
e
n
i
f
i
t
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
8
8
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
co
u
l
d
r
e
d
u
c
e
t
h
e
Ll
ev
e
l
o
f
Ss
er
v
i
c
e
(L
O
S
)
f
o
r
a
u
t
o
m
o
b
i
l
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
5.
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
T
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
,
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
s
to
m
a
k
e
t
h
e
m
m
o
r
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
f
r
i
e
n
d
l
y
a
n
d
l
e
s
s
a
u
t
o
-c
e
n
t
r
i
c
.
W
h
e
r
e
a
m
e
d
i
a
n
i
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
,
i
t
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
wi
d
e
e
n
o
u
g
h
t
o
s
a
f
e
l
y
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
da
t
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
.
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
su
c
h
a
s
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
,
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
,
R
a
i
n
b
o
w
,
Pr
o
s
p
e
c
t
,
o
r
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
m
a
jo
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
d
f
o
r
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
.
W
o
r
k
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
n
e
i
gh
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
,
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
r
e
d
u
c
i
n
g
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
wi
d
t
h
s
t
o
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
s
l
o
w
e
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
l
e
s
s
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
6.
C
r
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
M
a
r
k
i
n
g
,
M
e
d
i
a
n
s
,
a
n
d
“
C
h
o
k
e
r
s
.
”
F
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
r
e
v
i
e
w
,
m
a
r
k
c
r
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
s
wi
t
h
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
s
c
a
l
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
s
p
e
e
d
o
f
t
r
a
ff
i
c
.
U
s
e
m
e
d
i
a
n
s
a
n
d
“
c
h
o
ke
r
s
”
t
o
n
a
r
r
o
w
t
h
e
w
i
d
t
h
of
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
w
h
e
r
e
f
e
a
s
i
b
l
e
a
n
d
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
,
a
n
d
t
o
i
n
d
i
c
a
t
e
a
n
d
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
s
t
o
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
7.
Pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
/
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
(
P
B
I
S
)
.
Pr
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
a
c
t
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
(T
I
A
)
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
a
l
l
p
u
b
l
i
c
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
an
d
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
to
s
u
b
m
i
t
a
P
B
I
S
.
F
o
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
th
a
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
a
T
I
A
t
o
a
n
a
l
y
z
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
im
p
a
c
t
s
i
n
a
c
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
Co
u
n
t
y
V
a
l
l
e
y
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
(
V
T
A
)
T
I
A
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
ne
s
,
t
h
e
P
B
I
S
m
a
y
b
e
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
T
I
A
.
Th
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
o
n
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
es
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
i
n
t
e
r
m
s
o
f
s
a
f
e
t
y
,
r
o
u
t
e
co
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
,
l
o
s
s
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
a
d
e
q
u
a
c
y
o
f
p
r
op
o
s
e
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
a
n
d
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
d
v
e
r
s
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
o
f
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
/
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
on
a
u
t
o
m
o
b
i
l
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
v
i
c
e
v
e
r
s
a
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
8
.
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
.
M
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
,
as
n
e
e
d
e
d
.
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
t
o
p
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
b
i
cy
c
l
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
n
t
h
e
a
n
n
u
a
l
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
id
e
n
t
i
f
y
b
a
r
r
i
e
r
s
t
o
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
t
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
a
c
c
e
ss
a
n
d
t
h
e
n
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
h
o
w
a
n
d
w
h
e
n
t
h
e
s
e
b
a
r
r
i
e
r
s
w
i
l
l
be
r
e
m
o
v
e
d
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
89
.
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
Bi
c
y
c
l
e
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
Bi
k
e
w
a
y
Ne
t
w
o
r
k
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
a
s
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
.
T
h
e
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Ne
t
w
o
r
k
i
s
s
h
o
w
n
i
n
F
i
g
u
r
e
4
-
B
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
91
0
.
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
N
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
.
E
n
co
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
s
o
f
m
a
j
o
r
n
e
w
o
r
re
m
o
d
e
l
e
d
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
e
c
u
r
e
i
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
a
n
d
/
o
r
f
u
l
l
y
w
e
a
t
h
e
r
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
to
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
1
0
%
o
f
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
t
o
b
e
C
l
a
s
s
1
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
10
1
1
.
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
o
n
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
R
o
u
t
e
s
.
W
h
e
r
e
f
e
as
i
b
l
e
a
n
d
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
,
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
ca
l
m
i
n
g
o
n
t
h
o
s
e
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
r
o
u
t
e
s
w
h
e
r
e
a
u
t
o
m
o
b
i
l
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
v
o
l
u
m
e
s
a
r
e
l
o
w
.
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
t
h
e
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
Co
u
n
t
y
V
a
l
l
e
y
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
’
s
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
T
e
c
hn
i
c
a
l
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
f
o
r
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
c
a
l
m
i
n
g
me
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
f
l
o
w
s
b
e
s
t
w
h
e
r
e
a
u
t
o
m
o
b
i
l
e
t
r
a
ff
i
c
v
o
l
u
m
e
a
n
d
s
p
e
e
d
s
a
r
e
l
o
w
a
n
d
w
h
e
r
e
t
h
e
r
e
ar
e
n
o
s
t
o
p
s
i
g
n
s
o
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
s
t
o
h
i
n
d
e
r
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
f
l
o
w
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
11
1
2
.
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
i
n
m
u
lt
i
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
i
n
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
8
9
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
a
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
Se
c
t
i
o
n
1
9
.
1
0
0
.
0
4
0
o
f
th
e
Ci
t
y
c
o
d
e
par
k
i
n
g
req
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
3
.
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
s
.
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
fo
r
r
e
g
u
l
a
r
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
c
l
e
a
n
i
n
g
o
f
a
l
l
p
u
b
l
i
c
bi
c
y
c
l
e
a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
b
u
d
g
e
t
,
a
n
d
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
e
r
o
u
t
i
n
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
f
o
r
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
w
i
t
h
b
i
k
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
4
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
P
r
i
v
a
t
e
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
s
.
P
a
rt
n
e
r
w
i
t
h
o
t
h
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
a
n
d
/
o
r
o
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s f
o
r
b
i
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
,
an
d
m
o
t
o
r
i
s
t
s
o
f
a
l
l
a
g
e
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
4-
5
2
-
5
7
:
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
A
c
c
e
s
s
Cr
e
a
t
e
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
c
e
s
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
n
e
w
s
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
i
t
e
s
.
R
e
v
i
e
w
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
ci
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
p
l
a
n
s
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
a
n
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
fo
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
t
o
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
i
t
e
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
co
m
p
l
e
t
i
n
g
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
o
f
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
a
n
d
p
a
t
h
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
4
-
46
:
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
T
r
a
i
l
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
p
l
a
n
a
n
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
f
o
r
a
co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
s
y
s
t
e
m
o
f
t
r
a
i
l
s
a
n
d
p
a
t
h
wa
y
s
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
sy
s
t
e
m
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
B
a
y
T
r
a
i
l
,
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
a
n
d
R
i
d
g
e
T
r
a
i
l
,
a
n
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
e
d
in
t
h
e
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
a
n
d
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
.
T
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
A
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
B
a
y
T
r
a
i
l
,
a
s
s
h
o
w
n
i
n
th
e
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
B
a
y
A
r
e
a
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
s
’
B
a
y
T
r
a
i
l
p
l
an
n
i
n
g
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
,
i
s
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
Pl
a
n
b
y
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
GO
A
L
D
:
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d th
e
Us
e
o
f
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
Pu
b
l
i
c
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
n
d
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
th
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
N
e
w
R
a
p
i
d
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
Po
l
i
c
y
4
-
57
:
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
U
s
e
o
f
P
u
b
l
i
c
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
Su
p
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
u
s
e
o
f
p
u
b
l
i
c
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
N
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
.
En
s
u
r
e
a
l
l
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
am
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
p
u
b
l
i
c
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
s
u
c
h
a
s
:
b
u
s
s
t
o
p
s
h
e
l
t
e
r
s
;
s
p
a
c
e
f
o
r
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
t
o
s
t
o
p
a
n
d
ma
n
e
u
v
e
r
a
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
;
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
m
a
p
s
a
n
d
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
es
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
i
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
a
l
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
b
u
s
p
a
s
s
e
s
f
o
r
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
S
t
o
p
A
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
.
W
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
V
T
A
a
n
d
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
s
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
at
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
s
e
a
t
i
n
g
,
li
g
h
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
s
i
g
n
a
g
e
a
t
a
l
l
b
u
s
s
t
o
p
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3.
V
a
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
W
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
t
he
V
T
A
t
o
s
t
u
d
y
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
t
r
a
n
s
f
e
r
st
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
So
u
t
h
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
s
.
An
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
a
m
u
l
t
i
-
m
o
d
a
l
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
t
h
a
t
s
e
r
v
e
s
f
u
t
u
r
e
l
i
g
h
t
r
a
i
l
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4.
R
a
p
i
d
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
.
W
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
Sa
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
V
a
l
l
e
y
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
(
VT
A
) t
o
p
l
a
n
fo
r
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
b
u
s
a
n
d
/
o
r
l
i
g
h
t
r
a
i
l
r
a
p
i
d
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
se
r
v
i
c
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
a
n
d
n
o
r
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
cC
or
r
i
d
o
r
s
t
o
t
a
k
e
a
d
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
o
f
t
h
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
i
n
c
r
ea
s
e
i
n
m
i
x
e
d
-
u
s
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
D
e
A
n
z
a
Co
l
l
e
g
e
c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
b
a
s
e
.
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
fr
e
q
u
e
n
c
y
o
f
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
t
o
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
r
i
d
e
r
s
h
i
p
.
R
e
v
i
e
w
im
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
o
p
t
i
m
i
z
e
d
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Public Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
9
0
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
5.
S
h
u
t
t
l
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
.
S
t
u
d
y
t
h
e
p
o
s
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g
s
h
u
t
t
l
e
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
t
o
k
e
y
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
o
f
f
i
c
e
a
n
d
in
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
GO
A
L
E
:
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
Ro
a
d
w
a
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
s t
h
a
t
A
c
c
o
u
n
t
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
N
e
e
d
s
o
f
M
o
t
o
r
i
s
t
s
,
P
e
de
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
,
B
i
c
y
c
l
e
s
a
n
d
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
s
Po
l
i
c
y
4
-
68
:
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
N
e
t
w
o
r
k
,
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
n
d
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
an
d
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
f
o
r
a
s
a
f
e
,
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
a
n
d
m
u
l
t
i
-
m
o
d
a
l
t
r
a
n
s
po
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
t
h
a
t
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
l
y
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
h
e
mo
v
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
p
e
o
p
l
e
o
f
a
l
l
a
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s,
g
o
o
d
s
a
n
d
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
I
n
p
a
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
,
e
x
p
a
n
d
an
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
,
m
u
l
t
i
-
m
o
d
a
l
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
th
a
t
o
f
f
e
r
s
d
e
s
i
r
a
b
l
e
c
h
o
i
c
e
s
a
m
o
n
g
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
mo
d
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
w
a
y
s
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
s
a
n
d
b
i
k
e
w
a
y
s
.
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
L
O
S
D
f
o
r
m
a
j
o
r
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
m
o
r
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
a
f
t
e
r
n
o
o
n
p
e
a
k
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
ho
u
r
s
,
A
c
h
i
e
v
e
t
h
i
s
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
b
y
i
m
p
o
s
i
n
g
r
e
a
s
o
n
ab
l
e
l
i
m
i
t
s
o
n
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
th
o
r
o
u
g
h
f
a
r
e
s
a
r
e
n
o
t
u
n
d
u
l
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
e
d
b
y
l
o
ca
l
l
y
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
t
p
e
a
k
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
h
o
u
r
.
In
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
h
a
t
f
u
r
t
he
r
s
a
u
n
i
q
u
e
g
a
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
p
l
a
c
e
i
n
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
ar
e
a
o
n
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
s
e
t
t
h
e
L
O
S
s
t
an
d
a
r
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
w
i
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
w
i
t
h
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
t
o
L
O
S
E
+
.
(
N
o
m
o
r
e
t
h
a
n
a
n
a
v
e
r
a
g
e
4
5
se
c
o
n
d
s
o
f
d
e
l
a
y
p
e
r
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
)
.
T
h
e
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
f
o
r
t
he
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
t
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
Ro
a
d
s
h
a
l
l
a
l
s
o
b
e
L
O
S
E
+
.
LO
S
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
m
a
y
a
l
s
o
b
e
a
d
j
u
s
t
e
d
a
s
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
i
n
P
o
l
i
c
y
4
-
8
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
l
e
v
e
l
s
o
f
s
e
r
v
ic
e
f
o
r
a
l
l
m
o
d
e
s
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
:
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
d
o
p
t
i
n
g
a
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
po
l
i
c
y
w
h
i
c
h
w
o
u
l
d
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
w
h
e
r
e
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
o
u
l
d
n
o
t
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
er
e
d
w
h
i
c
h
w
o
u
l
d
d
e
g
r
a
d
e
l
e
v
e
l
s
o
f
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
f
o
r
n
o
n
-
v
e
h
i
c
u
l
a
r
mo
d
e
s
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
P
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
ot
h
e
r
a
r
e
a
s
w
h
e
r
e
n
o
n
-
v
e
h
i
c
u
l
a
r
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
rt
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
a
k
e
y
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
,
c
o
m
f
o
r
t
a
b
l
e
a
n
d
c
o
n
v
en
i
e
n
t
t
r
a
v
e
l
a
l
o
n
g
a
n
d
a
c
r
o
s
s
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
t
o
s
e
r
v
e
a
l
l
u
s
e
r
s
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
,
t
h
e
d
i
s
a
b
l
e
d
,
b
i
c
y
c
l
i
s
t
s
,
mo
t
o
r
i
s
t
s
,
s
e
n
i
o
r
s
,
u
s
e
r
s
o
f
p
u
b
l
i
c
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
mo
v
e
r
s
o
f
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
g
o
o
d
s
.
T
h
i
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
b
a
l
a
n
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
n
e
e
d
s
o
f
a
l
l
t
r
a
v
e
l
m
o
d
e
s
w
h
e
n
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
m
a
n
a
g
i
n
g
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
rt
a
t
i
o
n
u
s
e
i
n
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
r
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
.
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
m
a
y
in
c
l
u
d
e
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
d
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
m
e
n
i
t
i
e
s
,
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
l
a
n
e
s
o
r
c
y
c
l
e
-
t
r
a
c
k
s
,
bu
s
s
t
o
p
s
a
n
d
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
1.
S
t
r
e
e
t
W
i
d
t
h
L
i
m
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
T
o
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
t
h
e
b
a
rr
i
e
r
e
f
f
e
c
t
a
n
d
t
h
e
n
e
g
a
t
i
v
e
a
e
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
s
o
f
m
a
j
o
r
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Legal Requirements Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
9
1
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
st
r
e
e
t
s
,
l
i
m
i
t
t
h
e
m
i
d
-
b
l
o
c
k
w
i
d
t
h
o
f
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
t
o
e
i
g
h
t
l
a
n
e
s
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
23.
S
y
n
c
h
r
o
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
i
g
n
a
l
s
.
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
s
y
n
c
h
r
o
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
i
g
n
a
l
s
o
n
ma
j
o
r
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
f
l
o
w
a
n
d
r
e
d
u
c
e
c
o
n
g
e
s
t
i
o
n
.
3.
A
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
N
o
n
-
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
I
n
o
r
de
r
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
d
e
s
i
r
e
d
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
sy
s
t
e
m
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
,
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
’
s
r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
n
o
n
-
r
e
s
i
d
en
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
p
o
o
l
e
d
a
n
d
re
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
c
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
t
o
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
’
s
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
i
o
ri
t
y
t
a
b
l
e
s
a
s
s
h
o
w
n
i
n
t
h
e
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
th
i
s
P
l
a
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4.
C
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
C
a
r
r
y
o
u
t
a
ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
p
l
a
n
to
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
pe
a
k
h
o
u
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
f
l
o
w
s
o
n
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
n
d
m
a
j
o
r
co
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
t
v
e
h
i
c
u
l
a
r
,
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
bi
c
y
c
l
e
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
d
e
m
a
n
d
a
n
d
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
n
e
w
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
s
h
a
r
e
e
q
u
i
t
a
b
l
y
i
n
t
h
e
c
o
s
t
o
f
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
a
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
o
f
L
O
S
D.
I
f
f
e
a
s
i
b
l
e
,
t
h
e
P
l
a
n
s
h
o
u
l
d
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
L
O
S
h
i
gh
e
r
t
h
a
n
l
e
v
e
l
D
.
H
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
a
s
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
a
b
o
v
e
,
ex
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
i
s
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
a
r
e
s
e
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
ec
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
w
i
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
Bo
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
w
i
t
h
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
ec
t
i
o
n
o
f
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
t
B
o
l
l
i
n
g
e
r
R
o
a
d
.
5.
A
n
n
u
a
l
L
O
S
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
.
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
a
L
O
S
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
,
c
o
ns
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
r
e
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
VT
A
,
t
o
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
t
i
m
e
o
f
t
h
e
a
n
n
u
a
l
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
6.
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
M
a
k
e
c
a
pa
c
i
t
y
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
L
e
v
e
l
of
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
.
(
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
H
o
me
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
l
l
i
n
g
R
o
a
d
a
t
M
c
C
l
e
l
l
a
n
Ro
a
d
.
)
7.
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
d
L
e
v
e
l
o
f
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
.
S
t
r
i
v
e
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
he
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
L
e
v
e
l
s
o
f
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
w
h
e
r
e
f
e
a
s
i
b
l
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
5.
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
F
u
e
l
C
h
a
r
g
i
n
g
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
t
o
c
o
n
s
tr
u
c
t
a
n
e
t
w
o
r
k
o
f
p
u
b
l
i
c
an
d
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
f
u
e
l
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
c
h
a
r
g
i
n
g
/f
u
e
l
i
n
g
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
c
i
t
y
wi
d
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
6.
I
n
t
e
l
l
i
g
e
n
t
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
.
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
I
n
t
e
l
l
i
g
e
n
t
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
(
I
T
S
)
st
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
t
o
m
a
x
i
m
i
z
e
t
h
e
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
o
f
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
ng
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
t
h
ro
u
g
h
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
d
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
-
gi
e
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
a
d
a
p
t
i
v
e
s
i
g
n
a
l
c
o
n
tr
o
l
s
,
r
e
a
l
-
t
i
m
e
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
,
a
n
d
r
e
a
l
-
t
i
m
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
.
Po
l
i
c
y
4
-
79
:
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
n
d
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
N
e
e
d
s
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
n
e
e
d
s
o
f
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
w
i
t
h
d
e
s
i
r
e
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
e
rv
i
c
e
.
W
h
e
r
e
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
a
n
d
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
,
a
l
l
o
w
a
lo
w
e
r
e
d
LO
S
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
t
o
b
e
t
t
e
r
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
p
e
d
e
st
r
i
a
n
s
o
n
m
a
j
o
r
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
n
d
a
t
sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
Tr
a
f
f
i
c
S
i
g
n
a
l
W
a
l
k
T
i
m
e
s
.
T
h
i
s
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
i
s
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
in
P
o
l
i
c
y
4
-
3
.
A
d
d
e
d
t
i
m
e
o
n
w
a
l
k
s
i
g
n
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
mo
s
t
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
n
e
a
r
s
h
o
p
p
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
,
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
a
n
d
s
e
n
i
o
r
c
i
t
i
z
e
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
4
-
81
0
:
R
o
a
d
w
a
y
P
l
a
n
s
t
h
a
t
C
o
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
N
e
e
d
s
o
f
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
De
s
i
g
n
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
s
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
s
,
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
n
u
m
b
e
r
a
n
d
w
i
d
t
h
s
o
f
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
l
a
n
e
s
,
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
9
2
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
in
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
o
f
m
e
d
i
a
n
s
,
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
l
a
n
e
s
a
n
d
th
e
s
u
i
t
a
b
l
e
w
i
d
t
h
a
n
d
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
a
s
ne
e
d
e
d
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
t
h
e
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
In
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
d
e
s
i
g
n
t
h
e
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
t
o
s
a
t
i
s
f
y
t
h
e
ae
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
s
e
r
v
e
d
.
I
n
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
,
th
e
a
e
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
s
o
f
a
s
t
r
e
e
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
d
i
f
i
t
c
a
n
b
e
n
a
r
r
o
w
e
r
r
a
t
h
e
r
t
h
a
n
w
i
d
e
r
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
s
h
a
d
e
t
r
e
e
s
,
a
n
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
co
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
t
p
l
a
c
e
s
f
o
r
p
e
o
p
le
t
o
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
a
n
d
w
a
l
k
.
De
t
a
i
l
s
o
f
d
e
s
i
g
n
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
o
f
v
e
r
t
i
c
a
l
c
u
r
b
s
a
n
d
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
c
o
r
n
e
r
r
a
d
i
i
,
a
r
e
t
o
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
de
s
i
r
a
b
l
e
.
D
e
s
i
g
n
d
e
t
a
i
l
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
r
o
a
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
R
o
a
d
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
t
h
e
C
i
ty
’
s
r
o
a
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
t
o
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
,
bi
c
y
c
l
e
s
a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
,
a
s
w
e
l
l
a
s
t
h
e
e
m
b
o
d
i
m
e
n
t
o
f
a
e
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
a
l
l
y
pl
e
a
s
i
n
g
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
,
l
i
k
e
t
r
e
e
s
.
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
a
n
da
r
d
s
s
h
a
l
l
a
l
s
o
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
t
h
e
u
r
b
a
n
,
s
u
b
u
r
b
a
n
a
n
d
ru
r
a
l
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
u
n
d
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
R
u
r
a
l
R
o
a
d
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
a
nd
i
d
a
t
e
r
u
r
a
l
r
o
a
d
s
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
s
t
r
e
e
t
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
t
h
a
t
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
t
h
e
r
u
r
a
l
c
h
a
r
a
c
te
r
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
R
u
r
a
l
r
o
a
d
s
w
o
u
l
d
t
y
p
i
c
a
l
l
y
fe
a
t
u
r
e
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
n
o
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
, a
n
d
n
a
r
r
o
w
u
n
p
a
v
e
d
s
h
o
u
l
d
e
r
s
.
St
a
n
d
a
r
d
3.
S
e
m
i
-
R
u
r
a
l
R
o
a
d
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
I
d
en
t
i
f
y
c
a
n
d
i
d
a
t
e
s
e
m
i
-
r
u
r
a
l
r
o
a
d
s
w
h
e
r
e
c
u
r
b
an
d
g
u
t
t
e
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
a
n
d
n
o
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
,
a
r
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
.
St
a
n
d
a
r
d
4.
U
r
b
a
n
R
o
a
d
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
u
r
b
a
n
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
f
o
r
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
su
c
h
a
s
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
a
n
d
D
e
A
n
z
a
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
.
I
n
th
e
s
e
a
r
e
a
s
,
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
m
a
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
w
i
d
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
wi
t
h
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
u
r
n
i
t
u
r
e
.
St
a
n
d
a
r
d
5.
S
u
b
u
r
b
a
n
R
o
a
d
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
D
e
v
e
lo
p
s
u
b
u
r
b
a
n
r
o
a
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
f
o
r
al
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
n
o
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
a
s
r
u
r
a
l
,
s
e
m
i
-
r
u
r
a
l
n
o
r
i
n
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
.
St
a
n
d
a
r
d
6.
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
D
e
s
i
g
n
.
S
u
r
v
e
y
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
to
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
s
a
r
e
a
s
ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
a
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
W
h
e
r
e
f
e
a
s
i
b
l
e
a
n
d
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e,
r
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
r
e
b
u
i
l
d
t
h
o
s
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
w
h
e
r
e
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
o
u
l
d
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
f
l
o
w
a
n
d
p
e
de
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
Po
l
i
c
y
4
-
91
1
:
C
u
r
b
C
u
t
s
Mi
n
i
m
i
z
e
t
h
e
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
o
p
e
n
i
n
g
s
i
n
e
a
c
h
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
S
h
a
r
e
d
D
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
A
c
c
e
s
s
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
s
t
o
u
s
e
s
h
a
r
e
d
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
a
n
d
in
t
e
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
r
o
a
d
s
o
n
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
w
he
r
e
f
e
a
s
i
b
l
e
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
c
l
o
s
u
r
e
s
,
co
n
s
o
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
r
b
o
t
h
w
h
e
n
a
n
o
n
-
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
s
i
te
i
s
r
e
m
o
d
e
l
e
d
.
E
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
ac
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
s
t
h
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
v
o
l
u
m
e
f
o
r
a
l
l
a
f
f
e
c
t
e
d
p
r
o
p
er
t
i
e
s
,
a
n
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
ar
e
c
l
e
a
r
l
y
d
e
f
i
n
e
d
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
D
i
r
e
c
t
A
c
c
e
s
s
f
r
o
m
S
e
c
o
n
d
a
r
y
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
E
n
c
o
ur
a
g
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
w
i
t
h
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
o
n
m
a
j
o
r
a
n
d
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
9
3
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
se
c
o
n
d
a
r
y
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
i
r
e
c
t
a
c
c
e
s
s
to
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
s
e
c
o
n
d
a
r
y
s
t
r
e
e
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3.
T
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
C
u
r
b
C
u
t
s
O
n
N
o
n
-
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
i
te
s
.
P
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
c
u
r
b
c
u
t
s
o
n
a
n
o
n
-
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
s
i
t
e
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
f
i
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
op
e
n
i
n
g
i
s
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
f
o
r
p
u
b
li
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
T
h
e
s
e
t
e
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
op
e
n
i
n
g
s
m
a
y
b
e
c
l
o
s
e
d
a
n
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
h
e
d
r
i
v
e
w
ay
m
a
d
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
f
r
o
m
o
t
h
e
r
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
s
w
h
e
n
su
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
a
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
o
r
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
.
Po
l
i
c
y
4
-
10
1
2
:
S
t
r
e
e
t
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Pl
a
n
s
t
r
e
e
t
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
c
u
r
b
c
u
t
s
,
s
i
d
e
w
a
lk
s
,
b
u
s
s
t
o
p
t
u
r
n
o
u
t
s
,
b
u
s
s
h
e
l
t
e
r
s
,
l
i
g
h
t
p
o
l
e
s
,
be
n
c
h
e
s
a
n
d
t
r
a
s
h
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
e
r
s
a
s
a
n
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
l
p
a
r
t
o
f
a
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
a
n
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
a
n
d
t
h
e
sa
f
e
m
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
p
e
o
p
l
e
a
n
d
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
w
i
t
h
t
he
l
e
a
s
t
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
d
i
s
r
u
p
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
c
a
p
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
A
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
o
r
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
.
E
x
am
i
n
e
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
t
o
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
o
r
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
fr
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
a
t
t
h
e
t
i
m
e
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
s
i
t
e
s
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
t
o
r
e
g
u
l
a
te
t
h
e
e
n
t
r
y
t
o
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
a
t
a
c
e
n
t
r
a
l
p
o
i
n
t
.
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
in
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
s
h
a
l
l
b
e
w
i
d
e
e
n
o
u
g
h
to
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
B
u
s
S
t
o
p
T
u
r
n
o
u
t
s
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
s
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
b
u
s
s
t
o
p
t
u
r
n
o
u
t
s
,
o
r
p
a
r
t
i
a
l
t
u
r
n
o
u
t
s
,
w
i
t
h
i
n
th
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
f
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
o
f
a
n
e
w
o
r
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g
s
i
t
e
.
T
h
is
p
o
l
i
c
y
d
o
e
s
n
o
t
a
p
p
l
y
t
o
t
h
e
C
r
o
s
s
r
o
a
d
s
A
r
e
a
.
B
u
s
st
o
p
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
sh
e
l
t
e
r
s
,
be
n
c
h
e
s
,
t
r
a
s
h
r
e
c
e
p
t
a
c
l
e
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
a
m
en
i
t
i
e
s
a
s
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
.
F
o
l
l
o
w
t
h
e
VT
A
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
b
u
s
s
t
o
p
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
R
o
a
d
w
a
y
M
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
.
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
a
n
d
s
e
c
u
r
e
n
e
w
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
t
o
f
u
n
d
t
h
e
o
n
-
go
i
n
g
r
o
u
t
i
n
e
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
o
f
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4
.
T
i
m
i
n
g
o
f
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
I
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
t
h
e
fi
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
,
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
bi
c
y
c
l
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
s
t
r
e
e
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
B
u
i
l
d
p
e
d
e
s
tr
i
a
n
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
t
i
m
e
a
s
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
v
e
h
i
c
u
l
a
r
c
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
4
-
11
1
3
:
S
a
f
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
t
s
Re
q
u
i
r
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
s
a
f
e
f
o
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
S
a
f
e
S
p
a
c
e
s
f
o
r
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
lo
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
c
l
e
a
r
l
y
de
f
i
n
e
d
s
p
a
c
e
s
f
o
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
s
o
t
h
a
t
f
o
o
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
s
s
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
d
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
o
f
c
a
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
p
e
o
p
l
e
ar
e
d
i
r
e
c
t
e
d
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
i
r
c
a
r
s
t
o
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
e
n
t
r
i
e
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
GO
A
L
F
:
Mi
n
i
m
i
z
e
A
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
t
h
a
t
h
a
s
M
i
n
i
m
a
l
Ad
v
e
r
s
e
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
C
i
r
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
a
c
t
s o
n
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
Po
l
i
c
y
4
-
1
2
:
G
o
o
d
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
o
n
M
a
j
o
r
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
t
o
u
s
e
t
he
m
a
j
o
r
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
a
n
d
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
b
y
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
h
i
g
h
e
s
t
se
r
v
i
c
e
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
o
n
t
h
e
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
y
s
t
e
m
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
4
-
1
3
:
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
o
n
L
o
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
In
s
t
a
l
l
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
c
a
l
m
i
n
g
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
w
h
e
r
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
to
r
e
d
u
c
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
w
a
l
k
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
.
1.
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
A
f
t
e
r
e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
s
t
u
d
y
,
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
c
a
l
m
i
n
g
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
9
4
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
me
a
s
u
r
e
s
a
n
d
/
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
a
c
a
s
e
-
b
y
-
c
a
s
e
b
a
si
s
,
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
6
6
%
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
on
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
a
n
d
i
n
v
o
l
v
i
n
g
p
u
b
l
i
c
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
s
,
t
o
s
l
ow
o
r
d
i
s
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
.
Re
q
u
i
r
e
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
c
a
l
m
in
g
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
i
f
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
a
r
e
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
2.
D
e
s
i
g
n
o
f
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
t
h
e
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
c
e
o
f
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
f
o
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
ca
l
m
i
n
g
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
w
r
i
t
t
e
n
d
e
s
i
gn
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
f
o
r
e
a
c
h
t
y
p
e
o
f
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
.
3.
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
p
l
a
n
s
f
o
r
l
o
c
a
l
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
f
f
e
c
t
e
d
b
y
u
n
a
c
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
l
e
v
e
l
s
o
f
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
.
P
l
a
n
s
m
a
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
t
h
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
ca
l
m
i
n
g
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
m
e
d
i
a
n
s
a
n
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
r
ee
s
,
a
n
d
a
l
s
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
me
a
s
u
r
e
s
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
d
r
i
v
e
r
b
e
h
a
v
i
o
r
.
4.
U
s
e
V
T
A
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
T
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
i
n
s
t
r
ee
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
,
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
c
a
l
m
i
n
g
a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
4
-
1
4
:
L
i
m
i
t
e
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
C
l
o
s
u
r
e
s
Do
n
o
t
c
l
o
s
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
u
n
l
e
s
s
t
h
e
r
e
i
s
a
d
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
e
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
o
r
o
v
e
r
-
w
he
l
m
i
n
g
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
a
n
d
th
e
r
e
a
r
e
n
o
a
c
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
.
C
l
o
s
u
r
e
s
m
a
y
s
h
if
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
t
o
o
t
h
e
r
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
,
t
h
u
s
m
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
pr
o
b
l
e
m
f
r
o
m
o
n
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
t
o
a
n
o
t
h
e
r
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
4
-
1
5
:
S
c
h
o
o
l
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
n
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
Mi
n
i
m
i
z
e
t
h
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
o
f
s
c
h
o
o
l
d
r
o
p
-
o
f
f
,
p
i
c
k
-
u
p
a
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
o
n
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
.
Wo
r
k
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
wi
t
h
t
h
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
p
l
a
n
s
an
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
t
h
a
t
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
c
a
r
/
v
a
n
-
p
o
o
l
i
n
g
,
s
t
a
g
g
e
r
h
o
u
r
s
o
f
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
,
d
r
o
p
-
o
f
f
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
en
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
t
o
s
c
h
o
o
l
.
As
s
i
s
t
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
i
n
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
pm
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
“
S
a
f
e
R
o
u
t
e
s
t
o
Sc
h
o
o
l
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
”
t
o
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
m
o
r
e
s
t
u
d
e
n
t
s
w
a
lk
i
n
g
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
l
e
s
s
u
s
e
o
f
a
u
t
o
a
c
c
e
s
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
T
e
e
n
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
T
e
e
n
Co
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
t
o
w
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
t
o
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
ye
a
r
-
r
o
u
n
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
t
o
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
i
z
e
wa
l
k
i
n
g
a
n
d
b
i
k
i
n
g
t
o
s
c
h
o
o
l
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Community Input Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
4
-
1
6
:
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
N
o
i
s
e
,
F
u
m
e
s
a
n
d
H
a
z
a
r
d
s
In
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
t
o
l
i
m
i
t
i
n
g
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
v
o
l
u
m
e
o
n
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
,
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
f
r
o
m
n
o
i
s
e
,
f
u
m
e
s
an
d
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
c
a
u
s
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
em
.
T
h
e
q
u
a
r
r
i
e
s
o
n
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
R
o
a
d
,
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
Cr
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
r
e
ma
j
o
r
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
o
f
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
n
o
i
s
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
Q
u
a
r
r
y
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
.
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
t
h
e
q
u
a
r
r
i
e
s
’
u
s
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
i
m
p
o
s
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
o
f
Sa
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
a
n
d
o
p
p
o
s
e
a
n
y
ex
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
q
u
a
r
r
y
u
s
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
Q
u
a
r
r
y
T
r
u
c
k
S
p
e
e
d
.
P
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
e
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
of
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
p
e
e
d
s
o
n
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
a
n
y
o
n
,
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
Cr
e
e
k
a
n
d
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
.
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
r
a
d
a
r
s
p
e
e
d
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Community Input Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
9
5
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3.
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
W
o
r
k
t
o
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
e
f
f
e
c
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
sy
s
t
e
m
.
D
i
s
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
a
n
g
e
r
o
u
s
a
n
d
a
b
u
s
i
v
e
d
r
i
v
i
n
g
b
y
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
s
p
e
e
d
l
a
w
s
,
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
of
S
t
a
t
e
m
u
f
f
l
e
r
l
a
w
s
(
s
e
e
t
h
e
N
o
i
s
e
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
i
s
P
l
a
n
)
a
n
d
r
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
9
6
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
Th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
t
a
b
l
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
p
o
l
i
c
y
a
n
d
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
2
0
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
an
d
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
A
,
B
a
n
d
C
.
T
h
e
2
0
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
a
r
e
s
h
o
w
n
i
n
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
c
o
l
u
m
n
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
t
h
e
s
e
changes
re
f
l
e
c
t
t
h
e
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
p
o
l
i
c
y
u
p
d
a
t
e
s
e
n
v
i
s
i
o
n
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
(
e
.
g
.
,
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
,
l
e
g
a
l
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
nd
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y
/
e
d
i
t
o
r
i
a
l
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
)
.
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
GO
A
L
A
:
En
s
u
r
e
a
A
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
F
u
t
u
r
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
1
:
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
o
f
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
In
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
t
h
e
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
o
f
s
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
i
n
t
o
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’
s
pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
y
s
t
e
m
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
,
r
e
d
u
c
e
g
r
e
e
n
h
o
u
s
e
g
a
s
em
i
s
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
n
e
e
d
s
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
c
o
m
m
un
i
t
y
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
c
o
m
p
r
o
m
i
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
n
e
e
d
s
o
f
f
u
t
u
r
e
ge
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
G
r
e
e
n
h
o
u
s
e
G
a
s
E
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
T
a
r
g
e
t
.
Th
e
C
i
t
y
s
h
a
l
l
a
d
o
p
t
a
n
d
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
C
l
i
m
a
t
e
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
S
t
a
t
e
L
a
w
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
21
. S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
T
a
s
k
F
o
r
c
e
o
r
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
.
A
p
p
o
i
n
t
a
T
a
s
k
F
o
r
c
e
o
r
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
t
o
de
v
e
l
o
p
a
n
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
c
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
a
n
n
u
a
l
Su
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
a
n
d
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
P
l
a
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
o
v
e
r
s
e
e
t
h
e
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
th
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
C
l
i
m
a
t
e
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
.
T
h
e
mi
s
s
i
o
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
g
o
a
l
s
o
f
t
h
i
s
Ta
s
k
F
o
r
c
e
/
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
:
a.
Wr
i
t
e
a
n
d
k
e
e
p
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
t
h
e
an
n
u
a
l
T
a
c
t
i
c
a
l
C
l
i
m
a
t
e
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
an
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
n
g
o
i
n
g
me
a
s
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
a
n
d
C
c
it
y
-
w
i
d
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
t
o
h
e
l
p
ac
h
i
e
v
e
t
h
e
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
a
n
d
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
.
b.
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
an
d
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
,
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
i
e
s
,
an
d
pr
o
d
u
c
t
s
to
a
t
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
g
r
e
e
n
h
o
u
s
e
g
a
s
em
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
a
r
g
e
t
s
e
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
C
l
i
m
a
t
e
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
an
d
th
e
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
t
h
e
li
f
e
-
c
y
c
l
e
c
o
s
t
o
f
o
w
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
f
o
r
e
a
c
h
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
.
c.
Wo
r
k
w
i
t
h
C
i
t
y
s
t
a
f
f
t
o
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
t
h
e
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
f
e
a
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
se
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
n
a
n
o
n
g
o
i
n
g
ba
s
i
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
23
.
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
A
a
do
p
t
a
n
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
ne
w
en
e
r
g
y
ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
an
d
r
e
n
e
w
a
b
l
e
e
n
e
r
g
y
po
l
i
c
i
e
s
a
n
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
t
h
a
t
in
c
l
u
d
e
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
th
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
34
.
C
i
t
y
-
W
i
d
e
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
.
Co
n
d
u
c
t
a
C
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
s
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
a
n
o
n
g
o
i
n
g
mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
g
r
e
e
n
h
o
u
s
e
g
a
s
e
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
in
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
an
d
p
e
r
i
o
d
i
c
a
l
l
y
r
e
v
i
e
w
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
Cl
i
m
a
t
e
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
in
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
i
s
s
u
e
s
,
o
p
p
o
r
t
un
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Community Input PC Recommendation CC Direction Legal Requirement
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
9
7
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
54
.
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
E
n
e
r
g
y
a
n
d
W
a
t
e
r
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
.
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
a
n
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
su
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
e
n
e
r
g
y
p
l
a
n
a
s
a
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
ty
’
s
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
C
l
i
m
a
t
e
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
t
h
a
t
pr
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
e
s
e
n
e
r
g
y
a
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
T
h
i
s
p
l
a
n
w
i
l
l
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
l
l
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
re
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
:
a.
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
e
n
e
r
g
y
c
o
n
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
.
b.
Re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
f
o
s
s
i
l
f
u
e
l
s
u
s
e
.
c.
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
U
u
se
o
f
r
e
n
e
w
a
b
l
e
e
n
e
r
g
y
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
w
h
e
n
e
v
e
r
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
d.
Im
p
r
o
v
e
C
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
w
a
t
e
r
us
a
g
e
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
n
c
y
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
.
e.
Re
d
u
c
e
w
a
t
e
r
c
o
n
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
by
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
w
i
t
h
i
n
m
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
f.
Pr
o
m
o
t
e
an
d
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
i
z
e
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
w
a
t
e
r
re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
u
s
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
56
.
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
G
a
r
d
e
n
s
.
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
an
d
s
c
h
o
o
l
ga
r
d
e
n
s
,
w
h
i
c
h
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
m
o
r
e
li
v
a
b
l
e
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
b
y
co
n
t
r
o
l
l
i
n
g
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
f
a
c
t
o
r
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
e
m
p
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
,
n
o
i
s
e
, a
n
d
p
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
,
an
d
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
h
e
a
l
t
h
y
,
l
o
c
a
l
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
o
f
f
o
o
d
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
7.
F
i
s
c
a
l
l
y
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
W
a
s
t
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
.
C
o
n
s
id
e
r
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
a
n
d
s
o
c
i
a
l
c
o
s
t
s
i
n
a
l
l
de
c
i
s
i
o
n
-
m
a
k
i
n
g
a
n
d
b
u
d
g
e
t
d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
s
.
GO
A
L
B
:
R
e
d
u
c
e
d th
e
Us
e
o
f
N
o
n
-
R
e
n
e
w
a
b
l
e
E
n
e
r
g
y
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
2
.
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
G
r
o
w
t
h
a
n
d
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
a
n
d
l
o
c
a
l
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
t
o
pr
e
p
a
r
e
u
p
d
a
t
e
s
t
o
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
g
r
o
w
t
h
p
l
a
n
s
a
n
d
st
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
N
e
e
d
s
A
ll
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
(
R
H
N
A
)
a
n
d
t
h
e
r
e
g
i
o
n
’
s
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
R
T
P
)
a
n
d
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
ab
l
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
(
S
C
S
)
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
L
o
c
a
l
P
l
a
n
C
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y
w
i
t
h
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
P
l
a
n
s
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
l
o
c
a
l
p
l
a
n
s
a
n
d
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
s
o
t
h
e
y
a
r
e
c
o
n
s
is
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
t
h
e
Su
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
t
o
q
u
a
l
i
f
y
f
o
r
S
t
a
t
e
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
C
E
Q
A
st
r
e
a
m
l
i
n
i
n
g
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Legal Requirement
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
23
:
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
U
s
e
o
f
E
n
e
r
g
y
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
f
e
a
s
i
b
l
e
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
u
s
e
o
f
e
l
e
c
t
r
i
c
a
l
p
o
w
e
r
a
n
d
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
ga
s
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
f
o
r
n
e
w
a
n
d
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
s
,
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
,
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
a
n
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
e
E
n
e
r
g
y
S
o
u
r
c
e
s
.
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
e
e
a
s
e
o
f
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
an
d
u
s
e
o
f
so
l
a
r
e
n
e
r
g
y
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
e
,
r
e
n
e
w
a
b
l
e
e
n
e
r
gy
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
f
o
r
a
l
l
n
e
w
a
n
d
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
l
y
re
n
o
v
a
t
e
d
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
a
n
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
,
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
a
n
d
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
.
En
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
al
l
h
o
m
e
s
h
a
v
e
a
n
a
c
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
o
f
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
h
e
s
u
n
a
n
d
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
i
t
.
P
r
o
m
o
t
e
n
e
w
te
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
i
e
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
w
a
t
e
r
l
e
s
s
w
a
t
e
r
h
e
a
t
e
r
s
t
o
e
f
f
e
c
t
t
h
i
s
c
h
a
n
g
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
E
n
e
r
g
y
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
.
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
a
n
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
c
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
e
n
e
r
g
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Community Input Legal Requirement
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
9
8
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
p
l
a
n
f
o
r
a
l
l
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
an
d
t
o
a
c
h
i
e
v
e
t
h
e
e
n
e
r
g
y
g
o
a
l
s
es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
m
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
l
i
m
a
t
e
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
an
.
E
m
b
e
d
t
h
i
s
p
l
a
n
i
n
t
o
th
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
l
y
Pr
e
f
e
r
a
b
l
e
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
P
o
l
i
c
y
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
m
e
a
s
ur
e
s
a
r
e
a
c
h
i
e
v
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
a
l
l
f
u
t
u
r
e
pr
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3.
C
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y
w
i
t
h
S
t
a
t
e
a
n
d
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
.
Re
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
,
a
n
d
r
e
v
i
s
e
as
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
,
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
b
l
e
C
i
t
y
c
o
d
e
s
,
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
, a
n
d
p
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
s
f
o
r
i
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
o
f
l
o
c
a
l
,
s
t
a
t
e
a
n
d
f
e
d
e
r
a
l
po
l
i
c
i
e
s
a
n
d
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
th
e
en
e
r
g
y
a
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
u
s
e
o
f
e
n
e
r
g
y
a
n
d
fo
r
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
g
o
a
l
o
f
s
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
.
Ch
a
n
g
e
t
h
o
s
e
t
h
a
t
w
i
l
l
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
e
n
e
r
g
y
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
a
p
u
n
i
t
i
v
e
e
f
f
e
c
t
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4.
E
n
e
r
g
y
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Us
i
n
g
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
u
s
e
li
f
e
c
y
c
l
e
c
o
s
t
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
,
t
o
id
e
n
t
i
f
y
C
i
t
y
as
s
e
t
s
f
o
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
m
o
r
e
e
n
e
r
g
y
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
i
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
5.
I
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
u
c
h
i
t
e
m
s
a
s
re
d
u
c
e
d
p
e
r
m
i
t
f
e
e
s
f
o
r
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
t
h
a
t
e
x
c
e
e
d
Ti
t
l
e
2
4
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
Or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
C
a
l
G
r
e
e
n
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
P
p
ro
m
o
t
e
o
t
h
e
r
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
Ss
ta
t
e
,
Cc
ou
n
t
y
a
n
d
Ff
ed
e
r
a
l
Gg
ov
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
e
n
e
r
g
y
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
an
d
e
x
p
a
n
d
i
n
g
r
e
n
e
w
a
b
l
e
e
n
e
r
g
y
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
by
p
o
s
t
i
n
g
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
,
r
e
b
a
t
e
an
d
t
a
x
c
r
e
d
i
t
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
o
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
w
e
b
s
i
t
e
.
Le
t
’
s
ma
k
e
l
e
a
r
n
i
n
g
a
b
o
u
t
t
h
i
s
e
a
s
y
a
n
d
h
e
l
p
t
h
o
s
e
i
n
t
e
r
e
s
t
e
d
g
e
t
s
t
a
r
t
e
d
!
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
6.
S
o
l
a
r
A
c
c
e
s
s
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
E
e
ns
u
r
e
c
o
m
p
l
i
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
S
t
a
t
e
o
f
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
Su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
M
a
p
A
c
t
s
o
l
a
r
a
c
c
e
s
s
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
i
n
o
r
de
r
t
o
m
a
x
i
m
i
z
e
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
h
e
a
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
c
o
o
l
i
n
g
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
f
u
t
u
r
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
s
a
n
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
i
n
c
l
u
s
i
o
n
o
f
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
s
h
a
d
e
t
r
e
e
s
an
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
f
o
r
e
n
e
r
g
y
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
7.
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
:
De
v
e
l
o
p
O
f
f
e
r
co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
/
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
an
d
l
e
v
e
r
a
g
e
t
h
o
s
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
th
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
a
n
d
t
h
e
B
a
y
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
E
n
e
r
g
y
N
e
t
w
o
r
k
t
o
se
r
v
ei
n
g
a
l
l
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
u
s
e
r
s
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
a
n
d
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
i
n
h
o
s
t
e
n
e
r
g
y
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
w
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
s
f
o
r
bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
a
n
d
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
.
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
,
o
r
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
w
i
t
h
o
t
h
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
t
o
o
f
f
e
r
,
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
,
s
e
m
i
n
a
r
a
n
d
s
t
a
f
f
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
o
n
en
e
r
g
y
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
/
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
f
o
r
t
h
o
s
e
w
h
o
d
e
s
i
g
n
,
b
u
i
l
d
a
n
d
m
a
n
a
g
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
a
n
d
f
o
r
th
o
s
e
w
h
o
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
p
e
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
G
r
e
e
n
B
i
z
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
In
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
w
i
t
h
D
e
A
n
z
a
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
“
Su
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
P
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
s
”
g
u
i
d
e
f
o
r
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
b
u
i
l
d
s
u
p
o
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
.
T
h
e
G
u
i
d
e
s
h
o
u
l
d
in
c
l
u
d
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
r
e
b
a
t
e
s
a
n
d
s
u
b
s
i
d
i
e
s
t
o
m
a
k
e
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
g
a
s
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
m
o
r
e
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
l
y
a
t
t
r
a
c
t
i
v
e
w
i
t
h
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
b
a
c
k
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
,
S
t
a
t
e
,
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
w
e
b
si
t
e
s
f
o
r
u
p
-
t
o
-
d
a
t
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
9
9
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
,
o
r
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
w
i
t
h
o
t
h
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
t
o
o
f
f
e
r
,
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
al
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
,
s
e
m
i
n
a
r
s
a
n
d
a
c
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
pr
o
g
r
a
m
f
o
r
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
s
a
n
d
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
s
w
h
o
h
a
v
e
pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
i
n
“
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
”
c
o
u
r
s
e
s
.
Ma
n
y
o
f
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
i
c
u
l
u
m
s
a
r
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
a
t
De
A
n
z
a
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
.
A
s
a
n
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
f
o
r
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
n
g
in
th
e
“
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
”
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
w
il
l
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
“
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
B
u
i
l
d
e
r
/
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
”
pa
g
e
o
n
t
h
e
i
r
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
C
i
t
y
w
e
b
s
i
t
e
.
T
h
i
s
p
a
g
e
wi
l
l
n
o
t
b
e
a
n
e
n
d
o
r
s
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
o
r
co
m
p
a
n
y
l
i
s
t
e
d
,
b
u
t
a
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
c
e
n
t
e
r
f
o
r
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
Es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
a
n
d
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
E
n
e
r
g
y
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
C
en
t
e
r
o
r
K
i
o
s
k
a
t
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
w
h
e
r
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
co
n
c
e
r
n
i
n
g
e
n
e
r
g
y
i
s
s
u
e
s
,
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
,
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
a
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
i
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
.
Re
q
u
i
r
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
r
e
m
o
d
e
l
i
n
g
t
o
r
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
s
i
g
n
a
s
a
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
m
e
n
t
t
h
a
t
th
e
y
h
a
v
e
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
t
h
e
“
S
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
Pr
a
c
t
i
c
e
s
”
g
u
i
d
e
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
p
e
r
m
i
t
s
b
e
i
n
g
i
s
s
u
e
d
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
8.
E
n
e
r
g
y
C
o
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
he
u
s
e
o
f
e
n
e
r
g
y
c
o
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
th
e
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
o
f
a
n
a
w
a
r
e
n
e
s
s
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
t
a
r
g
e
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
la
r
g
e
r
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
u
s
e
r
s
a
n
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
9.
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
.
E
n
s
u
r
e
d
e
s
i
gn
e
r
,
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
s
,
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
b
u
i
l
d
e
r
s
m
e
e
t
Ca
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
T
i
t
l
e
2
4
E
n
e
r
g
y
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
S
t
a
n
d
a
rd
s
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
C
a
l
G
r
e
e
n
an
d
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
a
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
s
,
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
d
e
si
g
n
e
r
s
a
n
d
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
s
t
o
e
x
c
e
e
d
“T
i
t
l
e
2
4
”
t
h
e
s
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
fo
r
n
e
w
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
o
f
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
e
i
t
h
e
r
p
a
s
s
i
v
e
s
o
l
a
r
h
e
a
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
/
o
r
d
a
r
k
pl
a
s
t
e
r
i
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
w
i
t
h
a
c
o
v
e
r
f
o
r
s
w
i
m
m
i
n
g
p
o
o
l
s
,
ca
b
a
n
a
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
o
r
y
u
s
e
s
w
h
e
r
e
s
o
l
a
r
ac
c
e
s
s
i
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
re
n
e
w
a
b
l
e
en
e
r
g
y
so
u
r
c
e
s
w
h
e
r
e
f
e
a
s
i
b
l
e
,
a
n
d
de
v
e
l
o
p
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
o
f
f
e
r
en
e
r
g
y
a
u
d
i
t
s
an
d
/
or
s
u
b
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
t
h
a
t
a
l
s
o
a
d
v
a
n
c
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
ad
o
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
e
n
e
r
g
y
t
e
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
i
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
10
.
U
s
e
o
f
D
i
s
c
r
e
t
i
o
n
a
r
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
P
e
r
m
i
t
s
(
U
s
e
Pe
r
m
i
t
s
)
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
,
a
s
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
fo
r
n
e
w
a
n
d
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
,
t
h
e
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
o
f
e
n
e
r
g
y
c
o
n
s
er
v
a
t
i
o
n
/
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
a
l
i
g
n
e
d
wi
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
C
a
l
G
r
e
e
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
11
.
E
n
e
r
g
y
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
M
o
d
e
s
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
E
e
nc
o
u
r
a
g
e
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
,
en
e
r
g
y
f
u
e
l
-
ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
m
o
d
e
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
“
c
l
e
a
n
”
m
u
l
t
i
-
mo
d
a
l
p
u
b
l
i
c
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
,
c
a
r
a
n
d
v
a
n
p
o
o
l
i
n
g
,
f
l
e
x
i
b
l
e
wo
r
k
h
o
u
r
s
,
sa
f
e
r
o
u
t
e
s
t
o
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
,
an
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
p
a
t
h
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
tr
a
i
n
i
n
g
,
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
i
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
,
a
n
d
f
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
c
o
m
m
u
t
e
r
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
.
GO
A
L
C
:
Im
p
r
o
v
e
En
e
r
g
y
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
at
i
o
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
Ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
34
:
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
Se
t
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
en
e
r
g
y
a
n
d
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
i
n
g
/
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
(G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
)
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
“
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
”
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
a
n
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
“
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
”
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
P
e
r
i
o
d
i
c
a
l
l
y
re
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
r
e
v
i
s
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
Or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
a
l
i
g
n
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
s
t
a
t
e
C
a
l
G
r
e
e
n
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Community Input Legal Requirement
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
0
0
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
a
l
l
m
a
j
o
r
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
a
n
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
r
o
j
ec
t
s
t
h
a
t
e
n
s
u
r
e
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
e
n
e
r
g
y
co
n
s
u
m
p
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
wa
t
e
r
u
s
e
fo
r
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
s
i
t
e
se
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
an
d
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
E
n
e
r
g
y
A
u
d
i
t
s
.
Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
i
n
a
n
d
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
to
o
f
f
e
r
a
n
d
l
e
v
e
r
a
g
e
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
pa
r
t
n
e
r
s
’
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
t
o
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
e
n
e
r
g
y
au
d
i
t
s
,
w
h
e
r
e
f
e
a
s
i
b
l
e
,
a
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
ho
m
e
s
,
co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
,
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
a
n
d
c
i
t
y
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
co
n
v
e
y
t
o
t
h
e
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
a
n
d
i
n
du
s
t
r
i
a
l
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
t
h
a
t
en
e
r
g
y
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
/
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
i
s
,
i
n
t
h
e
l
o
n
g
t
e
r
m
,
ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
a
l
l
y
b
e
n
e
f
i
c
i
a
l
.
P
G
&
E
a
l
s
o
o
f
f
e
r
s
e
n
e
r
g
y
ev
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
o
l
s
a
n
d
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
r
e
e
o
f
c
h
a
r
g
e
r
e
c
o
mm
e
n
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
h
a
t
l
e
a
d
t
o
e
n
e
r
g
y
a
n
d
c
o
s
t
sa
v
i
n
g
s
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
n
t
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3.
“
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
”
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
G
u
i
d
e
.
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
a
“
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s”
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
g
u
i
d
e
b
a
s
e
d
up
o
n
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
’
s
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
,
C
a
l
G
r
e
e
n
,
a
n
d
ab
o
v
e
l
i
s
t
e
d
“
e
s
s
e
n
t
i
a
l
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
s
”
f
o
r
u
s
e
by
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
s
t
a
f
f
w
h
e
n
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
n
g
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4.
S
t
a
f
f
T
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
T
t
ra
i
n
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
s
t
a
f
f
i
n
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
s
,
c
o
s
t
s
, a
n
d
be
n
e
f
i
t
s
o
f
en
e
r
g
y
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
/
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
s
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s a
n
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
s
t
a
f
f
t
o
at
t
e
n
d
o
u
t
s
i
d
e
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
s
o
n
t
h
e
s
e
t
o
p
i
c
s
a
n
d
a
t
t
a
in
r
e
l
e
v
a
n
t
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
c
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
(
e
.
g
.
G
r
e
e
n
P
o
i
n
t
Ra
t
e
r
,
L
E
E
D
A
c
c
r
e
d
i
t
e
d
P
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
)
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
5.
“
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
”
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
S
e
m
i
n
a
r
s
.
C
o
nd
u
c
t
a
n
d
/
o
r
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
i
n
“
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s”
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
s
e
m
i
n
a
r
s
a
n
d
w
o
r
k
s
h
o
p
s
to
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
p
e
o
p
l
e
i
n
v
o
l
v
e
d
i
n
f
o
r
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
o
f
th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
y
,
l
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
en
t
,
r
e
a
l
e
s
t
a
t
e
s
a
l
e
s
,
l
e
n
d
i
n
g
i
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
s
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
,
th
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
y
a
n
d
p
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
s
.
We
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
mo
d
e
l
i
n
g
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
a
f
t
e
r
t
h
e
C
E
R
T
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
6.
P
u
b
l
i
c
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
Be
c
o
m
e
a
r
e
g
u
l
a
r
F
u
r
t
h
e
r
a
c
c
e
l
e
r
a
t
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
g
r
e
e
n
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
r
e
g
u
l
a
r
l
y
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
d a
r
t
i
c
l
e
s i
n
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
S
c
e
n
e
,
do
me
d
i
a
o
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
t
o
t
h
e
Co
u
r
i
e
r
a
n
d
t
h
e
G
u
i
d
e
(
S
a
n
J
o
s
e
M
e
r
c
u
r
y
)
, ta
p
e
t
h
e
s
t
r
e
a
m
i
n
g
Ss
us
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
Bb
ui
l
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
u
r
s
e
s
, o
r
s
e
m
i
n
a
r
s
an
d
b
r
o
a
d
c
a
s
t
t
h
e
m
on
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
C
h
a
n
n
e
l
a
s
w
e
l
l
,
a
n
d
m
a
k
e
th
e
m
th
e
s
e
r
e
c
o
r
d
i
n
g
s
av
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
a
t
t
h
e
L
i
b
r
a
r
y
.
GO
A
L
D
:
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
He
a
l
t
h
y
A
i
r
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
L
e
v
e
l
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
i
z
e
n
s
o
f
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
th
r
o
u
g
h
Ut
l
i
z
i
n
g
Lo
c
a
l
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
E
f
f
o
r
t
s
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
45
:
A
i
r
P
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
E
f
f
e
c
t
s
o
f
N
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Mi
n
i
m
i
z
e
t
h
e
a
i
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
f
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
pm
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
a
f
f
e
c
t
i
n
g
n
e
w
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
T
o
x
i
c
A
i
r
C
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
s
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
R
r
ev
i
e
w
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
f
o
r
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
o
x
i
c
a
i
r
co
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
n
t
s
a
t
t
h
e
t
i
m
e
o
f
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
a
n
d
c
o
n
f
e
r
w
i
t
h
B
A
A
Q
M
D
o
n
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
i
f
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
a
r
e
un
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
0
1
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
D
u
s
t
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
R
r
eq
u
i
r
e
w
a
t
e
r
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
no
n
-
p
o
l
l
u
t
i
n
g
d
u
s
t
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
me
a
s
u
r
e
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
d
e
m
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
t
h
e
d
u
ra
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
p
e
r
i
o
d
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
D
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
s
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
A
a
ss
e
s
s
t
h
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
f
o
r
a
i
r
p
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
e
f
f
e
c
t
s
o
f
f
u
t
u
r
e
l
a
n
d
us
e
a
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
,
a
n
d
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
s
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
g
o
a
l
s
o
f
im
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
a
i
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4.
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
E
e
va
l
u
a
t
e
t
h
e
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
o
f
s
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
e
r
e
c
e
p
t
o
r
s
,
s
u
c
h
as
c
o
n
v
a
l
e
s
c
e
n
t
h
o
s
p
i
t
a
l
s
a
n
d
r
e
si
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
,
t
o
p
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
s
o
ur
c
e
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
as
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
o
f
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
65
:
A
i
r
P
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
E
f
f
e
c
t
s
o
f
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Mi
n
i
m
i
z
e
t
h
e
a
i
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
P
u
b
l
i
c
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
a
C
i
t
y
wi
d
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
im
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
l
e
a
n
A
i
r
A
c
t
a
n
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
at
i
o
n
o
n
w
a
y
s
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
a
n
d
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
e
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
;
co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
pr
o
v
i
d
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
a
b
o
u
t
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
c
o
m
m
u
t
e
s
,
c
a
r
p
o
o
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
n
g
ph
y
s
i
c
a
l
ex
a
c
e
r
b
a
t
i
n
g
ac
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
o
n
“
S
p
a
r
e
t
h
e
A
i
r
”
h
i
g
h
-
p
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
d
a
y
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
H
o
m
e
O
c
c
u
p
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
E
x
p
a
n
d
t
h
e
a
l
l
o
w
a
b
l
e
h
o
m
e
o
c
c
u
p
a
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
y
z
o
n
e
d
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
t
h
e
ne
e
d
t
o
c
o
m
m
u
t
e
t
o
w
o
r
k
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3.
T
r
e
e
P
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
t
r
e
e
p
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
t
o
I
i
nc
r
e
a
s
e
pl
a
n
t
i
n
g
of
t
r
e
e
s
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
u
r
b
a
n
c
a
n
o
p
y
o
n
C
i
t
y
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
n
d
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
th
e
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
n
a
t
i
v
e
,
s
h
a
d
e
-
p
r
o
d
u
c
i
n
g
,
dr
o
u
g
h
t
-
t
o
l
e
r
a
n
t
t
r
e
e
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
p
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
s
o
n
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4.
F
u
e
l
-
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
C
i
t
y
P
e
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
E
n
v
i
ro
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
l
y
P
r
e
f
e
r
a
b
l
e
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
Po
l
i
c
y
,
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
p
u
rc
h
a
s
e
,
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
o
n
g
o
i
n
g
u
s
e
o
f
f
u
e
l
-
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
a
n
d
l
o
w
p
o
l
l
u
t
i
n
g
ve
h
i
c
l
e
s
.
U
p
d
a
t
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
o
l
i
cy
a
n
d
B
u
d
g
e
t
t
o
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
l
i
f
e
c
y
c
l
e
c
o
s
t
an
a
l
y
s
e
s
a
n
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
f
u
e
l
i
n
g
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
re
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
U
p
d
a
t
e
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
’
s
V
e
h
i
c
l
e
U
s
e
P
o
l
i
c
y
t
o
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
u
s
e
a
c
r
o
s
s
a
l
l
d
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
f
u
e
l
-
s
a
v
i
n
g
dr
i
v
e
r
be
h
a
v
i
o
r
s
a
n
d
h
a
b
i
t
s
.
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
f
l
e
e
t
ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
b
e
s
t
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
s
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
f
u
e
l
co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
f
l
ee
t
f
u
e
l
t
r
a
c
k
i
n
g
.
P
u
r
s
u
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
g
r
a
n
t
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
to
o
f
f
s
e
t
t
h
e
c
o
s
t
o
f
i
mp
l
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
5.
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
Q
u
arr
y
E
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
W
w
or
k
w
i
t
h
C
o
u
n
t
y
t
o
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
a
n
d
in
f
l
u
e
n
c
e
/e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
e
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
d
u
s
t
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
H
a
n
s
o
n
a
n
d
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
Q
u
a
r
r
i
e
s
on
t
h
e
W
e
s
t
e
n
d
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing Legal Requirement
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
6
:
W
a
l
k
i
n
g
,
J
o
g
g
i
n
g
a
n
d
B
i
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
,
j
o
g
g
i
n
g
a
n
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
i
n
s
t
e
a
d
o
f
d
r
i
v
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
0
2
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
7
:
U
s
e
o
f
O
p
e
n
F
i
r
e
s
a
n
d
F
i
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
s
Di
s
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
h
i
g
h
p
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
f
i
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
u
s
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
Ba
y
A
r
e
a
A
i
r
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
(
BA
A
Q
M
D
) L
i
t
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
M
m
ak
e
av
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
B
A
A
Q
M
D
l
i
t
e
r
a
t
u
r
e
o
n
r
e
d
u
c
i
n
g
p
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
f
i
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
u
s
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
N
e
w
F
i
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
s
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
P
p
ro
h
i
b
i
t
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
w
o
o
d
-
b
u
r
n
i
n
g
f
i
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
s
i
n
ne
w
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
e
x
c
e
p
t
f
o
r
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
A
g
e
n
c
y
C
e
r
t
i
f
i
e
d
W
o
o
d
s
t
o
v
e
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
GO
A
L
E
:
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
o
f
Sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
A
r
e
a
o
f
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
V
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
W
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
H
a
b
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
to
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
a
a
s
I
n
t
e
g
r
a
l
P
a
r
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
Sustainable
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
8
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
q
u
a
s
i
-
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
t
o
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
t
h
e
i
r
c
i
t
y
a
r
e
a
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
n
e
a
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
wi
t
h
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
n
a
t
i
v
e
p
l
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
d
r
o
u
g
h
t
to
l
e
r
a
n
t
,
n
o
n
-
i
n
v
a
s
i
v
e
,
n
o
n
-
n
a
t
i
v
e
p
l
a
n
t
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
s
.
Al
i
g
n
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
W
a
t
e
r
E
f
f
i
c
i
en
t
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
,
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
to
R
r
ev
i
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
l
a
n
s
f
o
r
o
p
p
o
rt
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
u
s
e
o
f
n
a
t
i
v
e
p
l
an
t
s
a
n
d
d
r
o
u
g
h
t
t
o
l
e
r
a
n
t
,
n
o
n
-
in
v
a
s
i
v
e
,
n
o
n
-
n
a
t
i
v
e
p
l
a
n
t
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
9
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
N
e
a
r
S
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
e
A
r
e
a
s
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
c
l
u
s
t
e
r
i
n
g
o
f
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
w
a
y
fr
o
m
s
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
e
a
r
e
a
s
s
u
c
h
a
s
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
,
wi
l
d
l
i
f
e
h
a
b
i
t
a
t
a
n
d
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
p
r
es
e
r
v
e
s
a
n
d
r
i
d
g
e
l
i
n
e
s
.
N
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
i
n
t
h
e
s
e
ar
e
a
s
m
u
s
t
h
a
v
e
a
h
a
r
m
o
n
i
o
u
s
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
s a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
R
i
p
a
r
i
a
n
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Re
q
u
i
r
e
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
a
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
1
0
:
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
N
e
a
r
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
V
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pe
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
W
a
t
e
r
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e,
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
l
y
P
r
e
f
e
r
a
b
l
e
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
P
o
l
i
c
y
,
an
d
t
h
e
P
a
r
k
s
&
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
G
r
e
e
n
P
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
,
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
E
e
mp
h
a
s
i
z
e
d
r
o
u
g
h
t
t
o
l
e
r
a
n
t
a
n
d
p
e
s
t
-
r
e
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
na
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
n
o
n
-
i
n
v
a
s
i
v
e
,
n
o
n
-
n
a
t
i
v
e
,
d
r
o
u
g
h
t
t
o
l
e
ra
n
t
p
l
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
g
r
o
u
n
d
c
o
v
e
r
s
w
h
e
n
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
pu
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
pr
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
n
e
a
r
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
p
a
r
t
i
c
u
l
a
r
l
y
f
o
r
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
o
f
e
r
o
s
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
d
i
s
t
u
r
b
a
n
c
e
to
t
h
e
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
t
e
r
r
a
i
n
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
1
1
:
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
A
r
e
a
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
Pr
e
s
e
r
v
e
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
on
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
a
n
d
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
w
h
e
n
n
e
w
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
Na
t
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
t
s
.
Pe
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
W
a
t
e
r
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
L
a
n
d
sc
a
p
i
n
g
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
,
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
l
y
Pr
e
f
e
r
a
b
l
e
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
P
o
l
i
c
y
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
P
a
r
k
s
&
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
G
r
e
e
n
P
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
,
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
E
e
nc
o
u
r
a
g
e
dr
o
u
g
h
t
t
o
l
e
r
a
n
t
n
a
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
d
r
o
u
g
h
t
t
o
l
e
r
a
n
t
,
n
o
n
-
i
n
va
s
i
v
e
,
n
o
n
-
n
a
t
i
v
e
p
l
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
t
r
e
e
s
,
a
n
d
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
la
w
n
a
r
e
a
i
n
t
h
e
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
0
3
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
1
2
:
H
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
F
e
n
c
i
n
g
Co
n
f
i
n
e
f
e
n
c
i
n
g
o
n
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
t
o
t
h
e
a
r
e
a
a
r
o
u
n
d
a
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
,
r
a
t
h
e
r
t
h
a
n
a
r
o
u
n
d
a
n
e
n
t
i
r
e
s
i
t
e
,
t
o
al
l
o
w
f
o
r
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
w
i
l
d
a
n
i
m
a
l
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
1
3
:
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
Li
m
i
t
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
a
r
e
a
s
t
o
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
c
o
m
p
a
ti
b
l
e
w
i
t
h
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
i
n
g
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
hi
k
i
n
g
,
h
o
r
s
e
b
a
c
k
r
i
d
i
n
g
,
m
o
un
t
a
i
n
b
i
k
i
n
g
a
n
d
c
a
m
p
i
n
g
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
1
4
:
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
W
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
T
r
a
i
l
s
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
l
i
n
k
a
g
e
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
a
n
d
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
es
f
o
r
b
o
t
h
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
n
d
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
,
mo
s
t
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
l
l
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
o
f
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
t
h
a
t
i
s
t
h
r
e
a
t
e
n
e
d
,
e
n
d
a
n
g
e
r
e
d
o
r
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
a
s
s
p
e
c
i
e
s
o
f
sp
e
c
i
a
l
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
Tr
a
i
l
E
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Re
q
u
i
r
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
c
a
i
t
o
n
o
f
c
r
e
e
k
s
a
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
c
o
u
r
s
e
s
o
n
s
i
t
e
p
l
a
n
s
a
n
d
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
th
a
t
t
h
e
y
b
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
f
r
o
m
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
S
t
a
t
e
t
h
a
t
t
r
a
i
l
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
t
r
a
i
l
l
i
n
k
a
g
e
s
m
a
y
b
e
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
i
f
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
y
a
r
e
n
e
e
d
e
d
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
GO
A
L
F
:
En
s
u
r
e
Mi
n
e
r
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
A
r
e
a
s
th
a
t
Mi
n
i
m
i
z
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
a
n
d
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
F
u
t
u
r
e
U
s
e
s
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
1
5
:
M
i
n
e
r
a
l
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
A
r
e
a
s
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
n
e
w
m
i
n
e
r
a
l
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
a
r
e
a
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’s
s
p
h
e
r
e
o
f
i
n
f
l
u
e
n
c
e
,
b
u
t
t
h
e
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
of
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
s
h
o
u
l
d
n
o
t
e
x
c
e
e
d
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
t
e
r
m
s
o
f
n
o
i
s
e
a
n
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
.
Fo
r
mi
n
i
n
g
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
w
Wor
k
w
i
t
h
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
t
o
a
s
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
m
i
n
i
n
g
op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
o
u
t
s
i
d
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
l
i
m
i
t
s
a
r
e
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
,
t
h
a
t
r
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
p
l
a
n
s
a
r
e
ad
e
q
u
a
t
e
,
a
n
d
t
h
a
t
m
i
n
i
n
g
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
i
s
n
o
t
e
x
t
en
d
e
d
i
n
t
o
u
n
d
i
s
t
u
r
b
e
d
l
a
n
d
s
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
do
c
u
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
a
n
d
en
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
a
n
d
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
N
o
i
s
e
S
t
u
d
i
e
s
.
P
e
r
f
o
r
m
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
n
o
i
s
e
s
t
u
d
i
e
s
i
f
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
mi
n
e
r
a
l
e
x
t
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
a
r
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
J
o
i
n
t
S
t
u
d
y
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
a
j
o
i
n
t
s
t
u
d
y
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
t
h
e
s
p
h
e
r
e
o
f
i
n
f
l
u
e
n
c
e
a
n
d
b
o
u
n
d
a
r
y
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
e
a
s
w
i
t
h
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
t
o
r
e
a
c
h
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
o
n
f
u
t
u
r
e
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
a
n
d
m
i
n
e
r
a
l
ex
t
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
1
6
:
M
i
n
e
r
a
l
E
x
t
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
s
Co
n
t
r
o
l
s
c
e
n
i
c
r
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
n
o
i
s
e
po
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
a
s
w
e
l
l
a
s
a
i
r
a
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
p
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
i
n
m
i
n
e
r
a
l
e
x
t
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
qu
a
r
r
y
i
n
g
,
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
i
n
g
a
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
1
7
:
I
n
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
s
Co
n
s
e
r
v
e
m
i
n
e
r
a
l
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
a
r
e
a
s
o
u
t
s
i
d
e
t
h
e
C
i
ty
.
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
N
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
W
h
e
n
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
is
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
,
d
o
n
o
t
a
l
l
o
w
i
n
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
i
n
a
n
d
a
r
o
u
n
d
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
m
i
n
e
r
a
l
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
a
r
e
a
s
.
U
s
e
s
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
i
n
c
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
a
e
h
i
g
h
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
lo
w
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
a
l
w
i
t
h
h
i
g
h
u
n
i
t
v
a
l
u
e
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
fa
c
i
l
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
ia
l
u
s
e
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
e
n
s
i
v
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
1
78
:
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
O
l
d
Q
u
a
r
r
i
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
0
4
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
r
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
i
n
g
a
b
a
n
d
o
n
e
d
q
u
ar
r
i
e
s
f
o
r
p
a
s
s
i
v
e
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
t
h
e
la
n
d
.
GO
A
L
G
:
En
s
u
r
e
t
h
e
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
U
s
e
o
f
W
a
t
e
r
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
1
98
:
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
W
a
t
e
r
B
o
d
i
e
s
a
n
d
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
Re
q
u
i
r
e
t
h
a
t
s
i
t
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
r
e
s
p
e
c
t
t
h
e
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
t
o
p
o
g
r
ap
h
y
a
n
d
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
e
x
t
e
n
t
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
a
b
l
e
t
o
re
d
u
c
e
t
h
e
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
a
n
d
l
i
m
i
t
di
s
t
u
r
b
a
n
c
e
t
o
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
w
a
t
e
r
b
o
d
i
e
s
a
n
d
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
c
a
u
s
e
d
b
y
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
r
o
a
d
s
,
h
i
g
h
w
a
y
s
a
n
d
b
r
i
d
g
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
V
o
l
u
n
t
e
e
r
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
v
o
l
u
n
t
e
e
r
o
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
h
e
l
p
r
e
s
t
o
r
e
a
n
d
c
l
e
a
n
th
e
cr
e
e
k
be
d
s
i
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
p
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
h
e
l
p
r
e
t
u
r
n
w
a
t
e
r
w
a
y
s
t
o
t
h
e
i
r
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
s
t
a
t
e
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
20
1
9
:
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
I
m
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
S
u
r
f
a
c
e
s
Mi
n
i
m
i
z
e
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
f
l
o
w
a
n
d
e
r
o
s
i
o
n
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
P
a
v
e
d
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
f
o
r
m
u
l
a
.
C
h
a
n
g
e
C
i
t
y
c
o
d
e
s
t
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
fo
r
m
u
l
a
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
n
g
h
o
w
m
u
c
h
p
a
v
e
d
su
r
f
a
c
e
i
s
a
l
l
o
w
a
b
l
e
o
n
e
a
c
h
l
o
t
.
T
h
i
s
w
o
u
l
d
i
n
c
l
ud
e
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
s
a
n
d
p
a
t
i
o
s
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
t
i
m
e
o
f
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
o
r
r
e
m
o
d
e
l
i
n
g
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
N
o
n
-
i
m
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
w
a
l
k
a
y
s
a
n
d
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
s
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
n
o
n
-
im
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
f
o
r
wa
l
k
w
a
y
s
a
n
d
d
r
i
v
e
w
a
y
s
.
I
f
u
s
e
d
i
n
a
C
i
t
y
o
r
q
u
a
s
i
-
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
r
e
a
,
m
o
b
i
l
i
t
y
a
n
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
ha
n
d
i
c
a
p
p
e
d
t
h
e
di
s
a
b
l
e
d
sh
o
u
l
d
a
l
w
a
y
s
t
a
k
e
p
r
e
c
e
d
e
n
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3.
M
a
x
i
m
i
z
i
n
g
i
n
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
M
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
i
m
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
a
r
e
a
s,
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
i
n
g
d
i
r
e
c
t
l
y
-
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
e
d
im
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
s
,
m
a
x
i
m
i
z
i
n
g
o
n
s
i
t
e
i
n
f
i
l
tr
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
u
s
i
n
g
o
n
-
s
i
t
e
r
e
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
4.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
v
o
l
u
n
t
e
e
r
o
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
h
e
l
p
r
e
s
t
o
r
e
a
n
d
c
l
e
a
n
t
h
e
c
r
e
e
k
b
e
d
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
20
2
1
:
P
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
F
l
o
w
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
Pr
i
o
r
t
o
m
a
k
i
n
g
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
s
,
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
i
n
c
r
ea
s
e
s
i
n
p
o
l
l
u
t
a
n
t
l
o
a
d
s
a
n
d
f
l
o
w
s
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
pr
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
f
u
t
u
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
a
v
o
i
d
s
u
rf
a
c
e
a
n
d
g
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
Be
s
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
s
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
io
n
o
f
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
a
n
d
n
o
n
-
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
B
e
s
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
a
c
t
i
c
e
s
(
B
M
P
s
)
t
o
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
e
t
h
e
p
r
oj
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
s
i
n
p
o
l
l
u
t
a
n
t
l
o
a
d
s
a
n
d
f
l
o
w
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
22
2
1
:
C
o
m
p
a
c
t
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
w
a
y
f
r
o
m
S
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
e
A
r
e
a
s
Wh
e
r
e
s
u
c
h
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
d
o
n
o
t
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
w
i
t
h
o
t
h
e
r
m
un
i
c
i
p
a
l
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
s
o
r
g
o
a
l
s
,
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
,
v
i
a
z
o
n
i
n
g
or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
,
c
o
m
p
a
c
t
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
w
a
y
f
r
om
c
r
e
e
k
s
,
w
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
,
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
s
e
n
s
i
t
i
v
e
a
r
e
a
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
23
2
2
:
St
o
r
m
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
Co
n
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
-
B
a
s
e
d
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
an
d
Z
o
n
i
n
g
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
t
o
f
o
l
l
o
w
w
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
-
b
a
s
e
d
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
z
o
n
i
n
g
b
y
e
x
a
m
i
n
i
n
g
t
h
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
c
o
n
t
e
x
t
o
f
t
h
e
e
n
t
i
r
e
w
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
a
r
e
a
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing Legal Requirement
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
0
5
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
S
t
o
r
m
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
n
d
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
S
t
o
r
m
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
w
o
r
k
wi
t
h
o
t
h
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
b
r
o
a
d
e
r
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
M
a
na
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
s
t
o
m
o
d
e
l
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
h
y
d
r
o
l
o
g
y
.
Th
e
S
t
o
r
m
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
s
h
o
u
l
d
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
t
o
p
r
e
v
e
n
t
“
1
0
-
y
e
a
r
”
e
v
e
n
t
s
t
r
e
e
t
fl
o
o
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
“
1
0
0
-
y
e
a
r
”
e
v
e
n
t
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
f
l
o
o
d
i
n
g
.
A
l
s
o
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
m
e
e
t
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
n
e
e
d
s
i
n
a
c
o
s
t
-
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
m
a
n
n
e
r
.
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
24
2
3
:
G
r
o
u
n
d
W
a
t
e
r
R
e
c
h
a
r
g
e
S
i
t
e
s
Su
p
p
o
r
t
t
h
e
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
V
a
l
l
e
y
W
a
t
e
r
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
t
o
f
i
n
d
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
g
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
r
e
c
h
a
r
g
e
s
i
t
e
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’
s
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
f
o
r
p
u
bl
i
c
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
s
w
h
e
r
e
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
25
2
4
:
O
t
h
e
r
W
a
t
e
r
S
o
u
r
c
e
s
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
o
f
o
t
h
e
r
w
a
t
e
r
so
u
r
c
e
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
w
a
t
e
r
r
e
c
l
a
m
a
t
i
o
n
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
26
2
5
:
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
W
a
t
e
r
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
,
e
s
p
e
ci
a
l
l
y
a
t
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
p
e
r
m
i
t
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
s
t
a
g
e
,
t
o
h
a
v
e
l
o
n
g
-
t
e
r
m
co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
m
a
n
u
f
a
c
t
u
r
i
n
g
a
n
d
p
o
o
l
i
n
g
w
a
t
e
r
s
u
p
p
l
i
e
s
i
n
th
e
p
l
a
n
t
.
W
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
S
a
n
i
ta
r
y
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
t
o
c
a
r
r
y
o
u
t
t
h
i
s
p
o
l
i
c
y
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
26
:
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
e
x
p
l
o
r
e
o
p
p
o
r
t
un
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
r
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
w
a
t
e
r
w
i
t
h
ne
w
m
a
j
o
r
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
po
s
s
i
b
l
e
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
r
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
wa
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
f
r
o
m
S
u
n
n
y
v
a
l
e
t
o
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
o
a
d
.
Ne
w
P
o
l
i
c
y
N
e
w
P
o
l
i
c
y
New Policy
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
2
7
:
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
W
a
t
e
r
C
o
u
r
s
e
s
Re
t
a
i
n
a
n
d
r
e
s
t
o
r
e
c
r
e
e
k
b
e
d
s
,
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
,
w
a
t
e
rc
o
u
r
s
e
s
a
n
d
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
i
r
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
st
a
t
e
t
o
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
h
a
b
i
t
a
t
a
n
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
p
o
t
en
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
a
s
s
i
s
t
g
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
p
e
r
c
o
l
a
t
i
o
n
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
la
n
d
a
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
o
r
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
u
c
h
a
r
e
a
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
V
a
l
l
e
y
W
a
t
e
r
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
.
W
o
r
k
w
i
th
t
h
e
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
V
a
l
l
e
y
W
a
t
e
r
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
re
l
e
v
a
n
t
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
rs
a
n
d
p
r
o
v
i
c
e
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
f
l
o
o
d
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
b
y
u
s
e
o
f
fl
o
w
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
2
8
:
I
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
A
a
ct
i
v
e
l
y
p
u
r
s
u
e
i
n
t
e
r
a
g
e
n
c
y
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
w
a
t
e
r
s
u
p
p
l
y
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
s
o
l
v
i
n
g
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
2
9
:
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
L
o
c
a
l
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Po
l
i
c
i
e
s
w
i
t
h
R
e
g
i
o
n
-
w
i
d
e
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
P
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
Con
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
c
oo
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
c
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
w
a
t
e
r
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
V
a
l
l
e
y
W
a
t
e
r
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
(S
C
V
W
D
)
,
S
a
n
J
o
s
e
W
a
t
e
r
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
a
n
d
C
a
l
W
a
t
e
r
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
be
i
n
g
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
e
d
o
n
a
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
s
c
a
l
e
.
M
a
n
y
o
f
th
e
s
e
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
a
r
e
o
u
t
l
i
n
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
S
a
nt
a
C
l
a
r
a
V
a
l
l
e
y
W
a
t
e
r
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
D
r
o
u
g
h
t
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
Co
u
n
t
y
w
i
d
e
W
a
t
e
r
U
s
e
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
W
a
t
e
r
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
th
e
d
r
o
u
g
h
t
p
l
a
n
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
w
a
t
e
r
r
e
t
a
i
l
e
r
s
(S
a
n
J
o
s
e
W
a
t
e
r
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
a
n
d
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
W
a
t
e
r
C
om
p
a
n
y
)
a
n
d
S
C
V
W
D
w
h
e
n
w
a
t
e
r
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
ef
f
o
r
t
s
a
r
e
n
e
e
d
e
d
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
0
6
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
3
0
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
E
f
f
o
r
t
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
w
a
t
e
r
co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
/
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
t
e
c
h
n
i
q
u
e
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
h
o
w
pa
v
i
n
g
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
i
m
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
s
i
m
p
a
c
t
r
u
n
o
f
f
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
.
Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
i
n
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
p
u
b
l
i
c
o
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
wi
t
h
o
t
h
e
r
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
c
o
-
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
e
s
.
Al
s
o
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
s
e
n
d
i
n
g
r
e
g
u
l
a
r
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
to
s
e
n
d
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
no
t
i
c
e
s
t
o
ho
u
s
e
h
o
l
d
s
a
n
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
on
w
i
t
h
wa
t
e
r
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
i
o
n
s
,
w
a
t
e
r
a
l
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
t
i
p
s
.
Be
c
o
m
e
a
r
e
g
u
l
a
r
l
y
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
o
f
f
e
r
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
d
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
s i
n
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
S
c
e
n
e
,
a
n
d
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
Co
u
r
i
e
r
a
n
d
G
u
i
d
e
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
vi
d
e
o
t
a
p
e
s
P
u
b
l
i
c
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
A
n
n
o
u
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
on
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
go
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
c
C
ha
n
n
e
l
a
n
d
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
R
a
d
i
o
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
D
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
G
a
r
d
e
n
s
.
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
w
a
t
e
r
-
w
i
s
e
d
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
i
on
g
a
r
d
e
n
s
i
n
s
o
m
e
p
a
r
k
s
wh
e
r
e
f
e
a
s
i
b
l
e
a
s
t
h
e
y
a
r
e
r
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
d
u
s
i
n
g
dr
a
u
g
h
t
d
r
o
u
g
h
t
to
l
e
r
a
n
t
n
a
t
i
v
e
a
n
d
no
n
-
i
n
v
a
s
i
v
e
,
n
o
n
-
n
a
t
i
v
e
p
l
a
n
t
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
M
a
s
t
e
r
G
a
r
d
e
n
e
r
s
.
W
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
M
a
s
t
e
r
G
a
r
d
e
n
e
r
s
an
d
o
t
h
e
r
r
e
l
e
v
a
n
t
s
t
e
w
a
r
d
s
h
i
p
pa
r
t
n
e
r
s
to
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
w
a
t
e
r
-
w
i
s
e
p
l
a
n
t
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
a
n
d
i
r
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
m
e
t
h
o
d
s
f
o
r
u
s
e
i
n
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
a
r
e
a
s
.
T
h
i
s
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
po
s
t
e
d
s
h
a
r
e
d
on
t
h
e
Su
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
’
s
Gr
e
e
n
we
b
s
i
t
e
a
n
d
in
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
S
c
e
n
e
Su
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
c
o
l
u
m
n
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
3
1
:
W
a
t
e
r
U
s
e
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
Pr
o
m
o
t
e
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
u
s
e
o
f
w
a
te
r
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
o
n
s
i
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
c
i
s
t
e
r
n
s
t
o
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
ra
i
n
r
u
n
o
f
f
a
n
d
t
r
e
a
t
e
d
g
r
a
y
w
a
t
e
r
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
12
.
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
P
l
a
n
s
.
Pe
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
G
r
e
y
w
a
t
e
r
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
,
R
r
eq
u
i
r
e
w
a
t
e
r
-
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
s
t
h
a
t
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
t
h
e
u
s
a
g
e
o
f
r
e
c
y
c
l
ed
w
a
t
e
r
f
o
r
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
i
r
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
a
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
23
.
W
a
t
e
r
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
W
w
or
k
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
V
a
l
l
e
y
W
a
t
e
r
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
,
S
a
n
J
o
s
e
W
a
t
e
r
a
n
d
C
a
l
W
a
t
e
r
t
o
u
n
d
e
r
t
a
k
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
m
o
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
u
s
e
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
c
y
f
o
r
mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
,
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
, a
n
d
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
c
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
s
.
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
f
o
r
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
t
h
a
t
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
th
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
G
r
e
e
n
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
C
e
r
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
g
o
a
l
s
o
f
l
o
n
g
-
t
e
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
at
w
i
t
h
i
n
Ci
t
y
Bb
ui
l
d
i
n
g
s
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
l
o
w
-
fl
o
w
t
o
i
l
e
t
s
a
n
d
s
h
o
w
e
r
s
,
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
u
t
o
m
a
t
i
c
s
h
u
t
o
f
f
v
a
l
v
e
s
i
n
la
v
a
t
o
r
i
e
s
a
n
d
s
i
n
k
s
a
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
i
r
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
,
p
e
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
W
a
t
e
r
E
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
Or
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
,
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
l
y
P
r
e
f
e
r
a
b
l
e
P
r
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
Po
l
i
c
y
,
a
n
d
t
h
e
P
a
r
k
s
&
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
G
r
e
e
n
P
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
GO
A
L
H
:
I
m
p
r
o
v
ee
d
t
h
e
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
S
t
o
r
m
W
a
t
e
r
R
u
n
o
f
f
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
0
7
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
3
2
:
U
r
b
a
n
R
u
n
o
f
f
P
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
P
r
e
v
e
n
-ti
o
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Su
p
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
i
n
t
h
e
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
V
a
ll
e
y
U
r
b
a
n
R
u
n
o
f
f
P
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
P
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(S
C
V
U
R
P
P
P
)
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
w
o
r
k
c
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
v
e
l
y
w
i
t
h
o
t
h
e
r
ci
t
i
e
s
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
r
u
n
o
f
f
di
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
i
n
t
o
S
a
n
F
r
a
n
c
i
s
c
o
B
a
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
P
o
s
t
-
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
U
r
b
a
n
R
u
n
o
f
f
M
a
n
a
ge
m
e
n
t
.
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
P
o
s
t
-
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
U
r
b
a
n
Ru
n
o
f
f
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
M
u
n
i
ci
p
a
l
N
P
D
E
S
P
e
r
m
i
t
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
u
r
b
a
n
r
u
n
o
f
f
f
r
o
m
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
t
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
H
y
d
r
o
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
.
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
H
y
d
r
o
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
N
P
D
E
S
P
e
r
m
i
t
to
m
a
n
a
g
e
r
u
n
o
f
f
f
l
o
w
a
n
d
v
o
l
u
m
e
f
r
o
m
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
si
t
e
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
3
3
:
I
l
l
i
c
i
t
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
i
n
t
o
S
t
o
r
m
D
r
a
i
n
s
a
n
d
W
a
t
e
r
w
a
y
s
Pr
o
h
i
b
i
t
t
h
e
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
o
f
p
o
l
l
u
t
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
i
l
l
i
c
i
t
d
u
mp
i
n
g
o
f
w
a
s
t
e
s
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
s
t
o
r
m
d
r
a
i
n
s
,
c
r
e
e
k
s
a
n
d
wa
t
e
r
w
a
y
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
O
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
a
n
d
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
w
i
t
h
pu
b
l
i
c
,
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
,
a
n
d
n
o
n
-
p
r
o
f
i
t
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
o
n
p
u
b
l
i
c
ou
t
r
e
a
c
h
a
n
d
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
t
h
e
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
c
e
of
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
3
4
:
S
t
o
r
m
W
a
t
e
r
R
u
n
o
f
f
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
i
m
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
a
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
i
I
nv
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
e
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
to
r
e
t
a
i
n
o
r
d
e
t
a
i
n
st
o
r
m
r
u
n
o
f
f
o
n
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
T
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
R
u
n
o
f
f
.
E
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
me
a
s
u
r
e
s
t
o
t
r
e
a
t
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
r
u
n
o
f
f
.
Ma
x
i
m
i
z
e
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
f
i
l
t
e
r
,
i
n
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
e
,
s
t
o
r
e
a
n
d
r
e
u
s
e
o
r
ev
a
p
o
r
a
t
e
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
r
u
n
o
f
f
o
n
s
i
t
e
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
3
5
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
n
S
e
p
t
i
c
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
Do
n
o
t
p
e
r
m
i
t
u
r
b
a
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
o
c
c
u
r
i
n
a
r
e
a
s
n
o
t
s
e
r
v
e
d
b
y
a
s
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
s
e
w
e
r
s
y
s
t
e
m
,
e
x
c
e
p
t
i
n
t
h
e
pr
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
R
e
g
n
a
r
t
C
a
n
y
o
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
3
6
:
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
t
o
r
m
W
a
t
e
r
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
Re
q
u
i
r
e
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
f
o
r
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
s
t
o
r
m
wa
t
e
r
p
o
l
l
u
t
a
n
t
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
s
u
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
en
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
3
7
:
P
e
s
t
-
R
e
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
L
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
D
e
s
i
g
n
F
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
Th
e
C
i
t
y
w
i
l
l
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
p
e
st
-
r
e
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
,
an
d
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
th
e
in
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
of
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
d
e
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
r
e
t
e
n
t
i
o
n
te
c
h
n
i
q
u
e
s
in
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
o
f
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
in
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
O
t
h
e
r
d
e
s
i
g
n
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
t
h
a
t
ar
e
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
g
r
e
e
n
r
o
o
f
s
a
n
d
o
n
s
i
t
e
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
g
r
e
y
w
a
t
e
r
f
o
r
i
r
r
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
GO
A
L
I
:
Re
d
u
c
e
L
o
c
a
l
l
y
P
r
o
d
u
c
e
d
A
So
l
i
d
W
a
s
t
e
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
S
t
r
e
a
m
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
t
h
a
t
R
e
d
u
c
e
E
n
e
r
g
y
,
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
a
n
d
Meets or
Ex
c
e
e
d
s
S
t
a
t
e
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
0
8
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
3
8
:
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
/
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
Ex
p
a
n
d
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
t
o
m
e
e
t
a
n
d
s
u
r
p
a
s
s
A
B
9
3
9
w
a
s
t
e
s
t
r
e
a
m
re
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
g
o
a
l
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
.
Re
q
u
e
s
t
t
h
a
t
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
a
l
l
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
to
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
th
e
i
r
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
t
o
h
e
l
p
t
h
e
ci
t
y
a
c
h
i
e
v
e
i
t
s
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
g
o
a
l
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
3
9
:
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
St
r
e
a
m
l
i
n
e
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
c
u
r
b
s
i
d
e
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
i
n
t
h
e
n
e
x
t
de
c
a
d
e
.
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
l
l
c
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
z
o
n
i
n
g
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
i
n
t
h
e
c
u
r
b
s
i
d
e
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
A
co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
i
s
t
o
b
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
fo
r
a
l
l
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
m
u
l
t
i
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
d
w
e
l
l
i
n
g
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
Lo
s
A
l
t
o
s
G
a
r
b
a
g
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
Sol
i
d
Was
t
e
a
n
d
Rec
y
c
l
i
n
g
Con
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
.
Wo
r
k
c
l
o
s
e
l
y
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
Lo
s
A
l
t
o
s
G
a
r
b
a
g
e
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
C
i
t
y
’
s
s
o
li
d
w
a
s
t
e
a
n
d
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
an
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
a
n
d
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
m
e
t
h
o
d
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
E
-
W
a
s
t
e
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
/
m
a
k
e
p
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
t
h
e
e
-
w
a
s
t
e
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3.
C
u
r
b
s
i
d
e
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
o
f
Yyar
d
Wwas
t
e
a
n
d
Com
p
o
s
t
a
b
l
e
s
.
I
n
c
l
u
d
e
v
e
g
e
t
a
b
l
e
,
f
r
u
i
t
a
n
d
ot
h
e
r
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
f
o
o
d
i
t
e
m
s
,
a
s
w
e
l
l
a
s
, r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
o
f
n
o
n
-
r
e
u
s
a
b
l
e
b
a
t
t
e
r
i
e
s
a
s
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
P
a
l
o
A
l
t
o
do
e
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
4
0
:
O
n
-
s
i
t
e
G
a
r
b
a
g
e
an
d
O
r
g
a
n
i
c
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
Ar
e
a
D
e
d
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
Mo
d
i
f
y
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
,
a
n
d
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
f
o
r
ne
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
,
o
n
-
s
i
t
e
w
a
s
t
e
f
a
ci
l
i
t
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
a
l
l
m
u
l
t
i
-
fa
m
i
l
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
t
o
h
a
v
e
50
%
o
f
t
h
e
i
r
g
a
r
b
a
g
e
a
r
e
a
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
t
o
re
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
n
o
m
o
r
e
t
h
a
n
5
0
%
g
a
r
b
a
g
e
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
co
v
e
r
e
d
a
r
e
a
f
o
r
a
c
o
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
g
a
r
b
a
g
e
,
re
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
o
r
g
a
n
i
c
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
.
R
e
v
i
s
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
o
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
s
a
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
r
e
l
a
t
i
v
e
t
o
o
n
-
s
i
t
e
w
a
s
t
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
a
l
l
m
u
l
t
i
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
,
c
o
m
m
e
rc
i
a
l
a
n
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
z
o
n
i
ng
d
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
t
o
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
th
a
t
a
mi
n
i
m
u
m
o
f
5
0
%
o
f
g
a
r
b
a
g
e
a
r
e
a
b
e
d
e
d
i
c
a
t
e
d
t
o
re
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
c
o
v
e
r
e
d
a
r
e
a
f
o
r
a
c
o
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
ga
r
b
a
g
e
,
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
o
r
g
a
n
i
c
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
4
1
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
m
o
t
e
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
u
b
l
i
c
e
d
u
c
at
i
o
n
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
o
l
i
d
w
a
s
t
e
d
i
s
p
o
s
a
l
an
d
re
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
w
h
i
l
e
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
i
n
g
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
o
r
g
a
n
i
c
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
Re
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
.
Us
e
t
h
e
l
o
c
a
l
t
e
l
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
c
h
a
n
n
e
l
,
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
S
c
e
n
e
,
t
h
e
In
t
e
r
n
e
t
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
m
e
d
i
a
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
at
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a
b
o
u
t
t
h
e
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
v
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
’
s
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
an
d
o
r
g
a
n
i
c
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
pr
o
g
r
a
m
s.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
R
e
u
s
a
b
l
e
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
.
E
n
co
u
r
a
g
e
u
s
e
o
f
r
e
u
s
a
b
l
e
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
0
9
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
4
2
:
C
i
t
y
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
O
r
g
a
n
i
c
D
i
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
C
i
t
y
s
t
a
f
f
t
o
r
e
c
y
c
l
e
an
d
c
o
m
p
o
s
t
at
a
l
l
C
i
t
y
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
an
d
O
r
g
a
n
i
c
D
i
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
Op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
io
n
b
i
n
s
a
n
d
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
h
e
nu
m
b
e
r
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
an
d
o
r
g
a
n
i
c
bi
n
s
a
t
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
a
l
l
y
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
r
ea
s
t
o
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
d
i
s
p
o
s
a
l
o
f
re
c
y
c
l
a
b
l
e
an
d
o
r
g
a
n
i
c
ma
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
a
l
l
C
i
t
y
p
a
r
k
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
a
n
d
I
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
s
.
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
w
i
t
h
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
/
in
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
y
un
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
a
n
d
a
r
e
a
d
h
e
r
i
n
g
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
an
d
o
r
g
a
n
i
c
d
i
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
go
a
l
s
a
n
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
re
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
an
d
c
o
m
p
o
s
t
i
n
g
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
s
t
a
f
f
a
n
d
s
t
u
d
e
n
t
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
4
3
:
R
e
-
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
o
f
R
e
u
s
a
b
l
e
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
Th
r
o
u
g
h
p
u
b
l
i
c
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
,
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
t
o
r
e
-
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
r
e
u
s
a
b
l
e
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
, (e.
g
.
,
ga
r
a
g
e
s
a
l
e
s
,
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
e
x
c
h
a
n
g
e
).
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
D
i
s
s
e
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
R
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
.
D
i
ss
e
m
i
n
a
t
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
b
o
t
h
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
a
n
d
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
s
o
f
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
r
e
d
u
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
o
l
i
d
w
a
s
t
e
s
t
r
e
a
m
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
U
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
n
e
t
.
S
e
t
u
p
a
w
e
b
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
b
e
n
e
f
i
t
o
f
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
w
h
e
r
e
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
c
a
n
b
e
po
s
t
e
d
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
i
n
g
th
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
r
e
c
y
c
l
a
b
l
e
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
ca
n
b
e
p
o
s
t
e
d
an
d
th
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
ex
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
.
ca
n
b
e
c
o
n
d
u
c
t
e
d
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
S
t
e
w
a
r
d
s
h
i
p
.
P
e
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
E
x
t
e
n
d
e
d
P
r
o
d
u
c
e
r
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
(E
P
R
)
p
o
l
i
c
y
,
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
E
P
R
i
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
s
a
n
d
s
t
a
t
e
w
i
d
e
l
e
g
i
s
l
at
i
o
n
t
h
a
t
w
i
l
l
g
i
v
e
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
r
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
f
pr
o
d
u
c
t
s
a
n
d
p
a
c
k
a
g
i
n
g
t
o
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
t
h
e
r
e
-
u
s
e
o
f
m
a
te
r
i
a
l
s
a
n
d
t
o
m
a
k
e
t
h
e
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
l
e
s
s
t
o
x
i
c
an
d
e
a
s
i
e
r
t
o
r
e
c
y
c
l
e
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
4
4
:
R
e
u
s
e
o
f
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
r
e
u
s
e
o
f
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
r
e
c
y
c
l
i
n
g
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
de
m
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
r
e
m
o
d
e
l
i
n
g
o
f
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
P
o
s
t
D
e
m
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
R
e
m
o
d
e
l
i
n
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
E
n
co
u
r
a
g
e
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
s
t
o
p
o
s
t
d
e
m
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
re
m
o
d
e
l
i
n
g
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
o
n
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
n
e
t
a
n
n
o
u
n
c
i
n
g
t
he
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
r
e
u
s
a
b
l
e
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
P
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
P
r
i
v
a
t
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
or
s
w
o
r
k
i
n
g
o
n
C
i
t
y
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
t
o
u
s
e
r
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
a
n
d
s
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
y
h
a
r
v
e
s
t
e
d
w
o
o
d
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
t
o
t
h
e
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
e
x
t
e
n
t
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
a
n
d
en
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
m
t
o
d
o
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
o
n
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
4
5
:
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
S
a
n
i
ta
r
y
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
[
m
o
v
e
d
t
o
n
e
w
P
u
b
l
i
c
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
In
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
]
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
4
6
:
S
u
n
n
y
v
a
l
e
T
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
t
[
m
o
v
e
d
t
o
n
e
w
P
u
b
l
i
c
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
1
0
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
El
e
m
e
n
t
]
Po
l
i
c
y
5
-
4
7
:
V
a
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
[
m
o
v
e
d
t
o
n
e
w
P
u
b
l
i
c
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
]
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
1
1
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
He
a
l
t
h
a
n
d
S
a
f
e
t
y
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
Th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
t
a
b
l
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
H
e
a
l
t
h
a
n
d
S
a
f
e
t
y
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
p
o
l
i
c
y
a
n
d
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
2
0
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
A
,
B
a
n
d
C
.
T
h
e
2
0
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
a
r
e
s
h
o
w
n
i
n
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
c
o
l
u
m
n
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
t
h
e
s
e
c
h
a
nges
re
f
l
e
c
t
t
h
e
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
p
o
l
i
c
y
u
p
d
a
t
e
s
e
n
v
i
s
i
o
n
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
(
e
.
g
.
,
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
,
l
e
g
a
l
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
nd
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y
/
e
d
i
t
o
r
i
a
l
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
)
.
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
GO
A
L
A
:
R
e
d
u
c
e
H
a
z
a
r
d
R
i
s
k
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
R
e
g
i
o
n
al
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
Mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
1
:
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
R
i
s
k
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
a
n
d
l
o
c
a
l
a
g
e
n
c
ie
s
t
o
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
M
u
l
t
i
-
J
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
L
o
c
a
l
Ha
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
(
L
H
M
P
)
f
o
r
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
a
n
d
B
u
d
g
e
ti
n
g
.
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
a
n
d
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
t
h
e
s
u
c
c
e
s
s
o
f
t
h
e
L
H
M
P
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
l
o
c
a
l
st
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
no
A
n
n
e
x
(
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
1
1
)
.
W
o
r
k
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
st
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
a
r
e
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
e
d
a
n
d
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
a
n
d
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
ad
e
q
u
a
t
e
b
u
d
g
e
t
f
o
r
o
n
-
g
o
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
a
n
d
d
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
I
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
E
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
L
H
M
P
a
r
e
b
e
i
n
g
in
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
o
u
p
c
o
m
i
n
g
C
i
t
y
s
p
on
s
o
r
e
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
,
w
h
e
r
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3
.
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
Up
d
a
t
e
s
.
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
S
a
n
t
a
C
l
a
r
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
i
n
i
t
s
r
o
l
e
a
s
th
e
l
e
a
d
a
g
e
n
c
y
t
h
a
t
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
s
a
n
d
u
p
d
a
t
e
s
t
h
e
L
o
c
a
l
H
a
z
a
r
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Legal Requirement
GO
A
L
AB
:
R
e
d
u
c
e
d R
i
s
k
s
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
G
e
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
n
d
S
e
i
s
m
i
c
H
a
z
a
r
d
s
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
12
:
S
e
i
s
m
i
c
/
G
e
o
l
o
g
i
c
R
e
v
i
e
w
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
Ev
a
l
u
a
t
e
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
m
a
pp
e
d
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
h
a
z
a
r
d
z
o
n
e
s
u
s
i
n
g
a
f
o
r
m
a
l
se
i
s
m
i
c
/
g
e
o
l
o
g
i
c
r
e
v
i
e
w
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
U
s
e
T
a
b
l
e
6
-
D
o
f
t
h
i
s
H
a
z
a
r
d
s
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
t
h
e
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
r
e
v
i
e
w
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
1.
A
c
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
L
e
v
e
l
o
f
R
i
s
k
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
s
t
o
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
w
i
t
h
d
e
s
i
g
n
p
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
s
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
pe
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
-
b
a
s
e
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
t
o
a
c
h
i
e
v
e
l
e
v
e
l
s
o
f
s
a
fe
t
y
t
h
a
t
e
x
c
e
e
d
t
h
e
U
n
i
f
o
r
m
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
.
T
h
e
de
s
i
g
n
c
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
t
h
e
m
a
x
i
m
u
m
c
r
e
d
i
b
l
e
e
a
rt
h
q
u
a
k
e
f
o
r
t
h
a
t
s
i
t
e
.
H
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
u
s
e
a
n
d
st
o
r
a
g
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
a
i
m
f
o
r
t
h
e
hi
g
h
e
s
t
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
s
e
i
s
m
i
c
r
e
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
21
.
G
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
a
n
d
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
al
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
s
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
g
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Legal Requirement
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
1
2
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
an
a
l
y
s
e
s
p
e
r
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
Se
i
s
m
i
c
H
a
z
a
r
d
s
M
a
p
p
i
n
g
A
c
t
a
n
d
t
h
e
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
A
c
t
.
I
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
an
y
s
i
t
e
w
i
t
h
a
s
l
o
p
e
e
x
c
e
e
d
i
n
g
1
0
%
t
o
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
t
h
e
La
n
d
s
l
i
d
e
H
a
z
a
r
d
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
Z
o
n
e
m
a
p
s
o
f
t
h
e
S
t
a
t
e
o
f
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
f
o
r
a
l
l
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
g
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
a
n
d
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
.
3.
E
a
r
t
h
q
u
a
k
e
-
R
e
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
D
e
s
i
g
n
T
e
c
h
-
n
i
q
u
e
s
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
n
e
w
e
a
r
t
h
q
u
a
k
e
-
r
e
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
t
e
c
h
n
i
q
u
e
s
i
n
th
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
o
f
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
.
4.
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
.
R
e
v
i
e
w
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
f
o
r
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
s
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
ea
r
t
h
q
u
a
k
e
d
a
m
a
g
e
.
E
x
a
m
p
l
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
b
r
ac
i
n
g
f
o
r
g
a
r
a
g
e
o
p
e
n
i
n
g
s
o
f
t
w
o
-
s
t
o
r
y
a
n
d
s
p
l
i
t
-
le
v
e
l
h
o
m
e
s
a
n
d
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
f
i
r
s
t
s
t
o
r
y
b
r
a
c
i
n
g
i
n
m
u
lt
i
p
l
e
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
s
o
v
e
r
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
g
a
r
a
g
e
s
.
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
s
t
o
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
i
n
t
h
e
s
e
s
i
t
u
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
52
. R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
. R
e
q
u
i
r
e
t
h
a
t
a
n
y
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
t
h
a
t
i
s
b
e
i
n
g
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
m
o
r
e
t
h
a
n
5
0
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
%
in
p
r
i
c
e
, o
r
mo
r
e
t
h
a
n
5
0
%
i
n
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
si
z
e
,
co
n
f
o
r
m
t
o
a
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
th
e
cu
r
r
e
n
t
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
c
o
d
e
th
e
n
i
n
e
x
i
s
t
e
n
c
e
th
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
e
n
t
i
r
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
.
O
w
n
e
r
s
o
f
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
w
i
t
h
k
n
o
w
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
d
e
f
e
c
t
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
u
n
-
r
e
i
n
f
o
r
c
e
d
g
a
r
a
g
e
o
p
e
n
i
n
g
s
,
“S
o
f
t
f
i
r
s
t
s
t
o
r
y
”
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
u
n
b
ol
t
e
d
f
o
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
,
o
r
i
n
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
s
he
e
r
w
a
l
l
s
a
r
e
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
d
t
o
t
a
k
e
st
e
p
s
t
o
r
e
m
e
d
y
t
h
e
p
r
o
b
l
e
m
a
n
d
b
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
i
r
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
u
p
t
o
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
c
o
d
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
63
.
Ge
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
G
e
o
l
o
g
i
c
Re
v
i
e
w
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
.
Ad
o
p
t
a
g
e
o
t
e
c
h
n
i
c
a
l
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
ge
o
l
o
g
i
c
re
v
i
e
w
p
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
fo
r
G
e
o
l
o
g
i
c
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
b
y
Ch
a
p
t
e
r
1
9
o
f
t
h
e
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
th
a
t
in
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
s
t
h
e
s
e
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
s
i
n
t
o
th
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
23
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
S
e
i
s
m
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
Re
i
n
f
o
r
c
e
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
u
b
l
i
c
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
t
o
h
e
l
p
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
r
e
d
u
c
e
e
a
r
t
h
q
u
a
k
e
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
C
o
v
e
n
a
n
t
o
n
S
e
i
s
m
i
c
R
i
s
k
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
s
t
o
r
e
c
o
r
d
a
c
o
v
e
n
a
n
t
t
o
t
e
l
l
f
u
t
u
r
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
i
n
hi
g
h
-
r
i
s
k
a
r
e
a
s
a
b
o
u
t
t
h
e
r
i
s
k
a
n
d
i
n
f
o
r
m
t
h
e
m
t
h
a
t
m
o
re
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
i
n
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
r
e
c
o
r
d
s
.
T
h
i
s
i
s
i
n
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
S
t
a
t
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
a
t
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
t
h
e
g
e
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
r
e
p
o
r
t
i
s
r
e
c
o
r
d
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
f
a
c
e
o
f
su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
m
a
p
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
n
e
s
s
.
P
u
b
l
i
s
h
a
n
d
p
r
o
m
ot
e
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
n
e
s
s
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
dr
i
l
l
s
.
U
s
e
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
S
c
e
n
e
,
C
i
t
y
s
o
c
i
a
l
m
e
d
i
a
,
a
n
d
w
e
b
s
i
t
e
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
t
i
p
s
t
h
a
t
m
a
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
id
e
n
t
i
f
y
i
n
g
a
n
d
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
i
n
g
h
o
u
s
e
h
o
l
d
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
,
k
n
o
w
i
n
g
ho
w
a
n
d
w
h
e
n
t
o
t
u
r
n
o
f
f
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
h
e
l
p
i
n
g
f
a
m
i
l
y
me
m
b
e
r
s
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
t
h
e
m
s
e
l
v
e
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
a
n
d
a
f
t
e
r
a
n
e
a
r
t
h
q
u
a
k
e
,
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
i
n
g
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
pr
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
,
a
n
d
a
d
v
i
s
i
n
g
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
t
o
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
s
u
p
p
l
y
k
i
t
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
f
i
r
s
t
-
a
i
d
su
p
p
l
i
e
s
,
f
o
o
d
,
d
r
i
n
k
i
n
g
w
a
t
e
r
a
n
d
b
a
t
t
e
ry
o
p
e
r
a
t
e
d
r
a
d
i
o
s
a
n
d
f
l
a
s
h
l
i
g
h
t
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3.
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
G
r
o
u
p
s
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
ag
e
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
1
3
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Re
s
p
o
n
s
e
T
e
a
m
(
C
E
R
T
)
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
.
T
r
a
i
n
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
g
r
ou
p
s
t
o
c
a
r
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
m
s
e
l
v
e
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
d
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
s
.
Act
i
v
e
l
y
a
ss
i
s
t
i
n
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
d
r
i
l
l
s
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
e
x
c
e
r
c
i
s
e
s
t
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
b
u
i
l
d
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4.
D
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
P
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
A
s
p
a
r
t
o
f
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
,
a
ct
i
v
e
l
y
c
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
S
t
a
t
e
ag
e
n
c
i
e
s
t
h
a
t
o
v
e
r
s
e
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
vu
l
n
e
r
a
b
l
e
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
p
e
r
s
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
d
i
s
a
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
t
h
o
s
e
w
i
t
h
a
c
c
e
s
s
an
d
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
a
l
n
e
e
d
s
,
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
s
u
c
h
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
c
o
n
f
o
r
m
t
o
a
l
l
h
e
a
l
t
h
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
,
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
,
e
x
e
r
c
i
s
e
s
a
n
d
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
5.
F
o
r
e
i
g
n
L
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
.
O
b
t
a
i
n
t
r
a
n
s
l
a
t
e
d
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
n
e
s
s
ma
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
a
n
d
m
a
k
e
t
h
e
m
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
t
o
a
pp
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
f
o
r
e
i
g
n
l
a
n
g
u
a
g
e
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
GO
A
L
BC
:
Ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
a
n
d
E
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
F
i
r
e
a
n
d
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
o
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
f
r
o
m
H
a
z
a
r
d
s
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
W
i
l
d
la
n
d
and Urban Fires through
Ef
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
a
n
d
E
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
F
i
r
e
a
n
d
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
34
:
W
i
l
d
F
i
r
e
P
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
E
f
f
o
r
t
s
Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
w
i
l
d
f
i
r
e
p
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
e
f
f
o
rt
s
w
i
t
h
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
j
u
r
i
s
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
54
:
C
o
u
n
t
y
F
i
r
e
H
a
z
a
r
d
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
t
o
p
u
t
i
n
t
o
e
f
f
e
c
t
t
h
e
f
i
r
e
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
po
l
i
c
i
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
P
u
b
l
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
65
:
F
u
e
l
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
R
e
d
u
c
e
F
i
r
e
H
a
z
a
r
d
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
M
i
d
p
e
n
i
n
s
u
l
a
O
p
e
n
S
p
ac
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
a
n
d
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
P
a
r
k
s
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
t
o
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
in
f
u
e
l
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
f
i
r
e
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
76
:
G
r
e
e
n
F
i
r
e
B
r
e
a
k
s
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
M
i
d
p
e
n
i
n
s
u
l
a
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
t
o
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
“
g
r
e
e
n
”
fi
r
e
b
r
e
a
k
u
s
e
s
f
o
r
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
la
n
d
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
GO
A
L
CD
:
Fi
r
e
P
r
e
v
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
t
h
a
t
Mi
n
i
m
i
z
e
t
h
e
L
o
s
s
o
f
L
i
f
e
a
n
d
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
A
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
F
i
r
e
P
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
87
:
E
a
r
l
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
R
e
v
i
e
w
In
v
o
l
v
e
t
h
e
F
i
r
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
h
e
e
a
r
l
y
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
t
a
g
e
of
a
l
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
i
n
g
p
u
b
l
i
c
r
e
v
i
e
w
t
o
a
s
s
u
r
e
Fi
r
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
i
n
p
u
t
a
n
d
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
98
:
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
F
i
r
e
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
G
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
F
i
r
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
n
e
w
gu
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
f
o
r
f
i
r
e
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
10
9
:
F
i
r
e
P
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
n
e
s
s
Pr
o
m
o
t
e
f
i
r
e
p
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
n
e
s
s
t
h
ro
u
g
h
c
i
t
y
-
i
n
i
t
i
a
t
e
d
p
u
b
li
c
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
,
th
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
g
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
t
e
l
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
c
h
a
nn
e
l
,
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
n
e
t
a
n
d
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
S
c
e
n
e
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
11
1
0
:
M
u
l
t
i
-
S
t
o
r
y
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
F
i
r
e
R
i
s
k
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
1
4
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Re
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
t
h
a
t
m
u
l
t
i
-
s
t
o
r
y
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
o
f
a
n
y
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
t
y
p
e
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
r
i
s
k
s
o
f
f
i
r
e
.
E
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
f
i
r
e
pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
s
b
u
i
l
t
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
o
n
-s
i
t
e
f
i
r
e
s
u
p
p
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
a
n
d
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
en
s
u
r
e
t
h
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
1
1
:
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
F
i
r
e
S
p
r
i
n
k
l
e
r
s
O
r
d
i
n
a
n
c
e
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
d
o
p
t
i
n
g
a
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
f
i
r
e
s
p
r
i
n
k
l
e
r
o
r
d
i
na
n
c
e
.
T
h
i
s
w
i
l
l
r
e
d
u
c
e
f
i
r
e
f
l
o
w
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
1
2
:
S
m
o
k
e
D
e
t
e
c
t
o
r
s
Re
q
u
i
r
e
s
m
o
k
e
d
e
t
e
c
t
o
r
s
i
n
a
l
l
n
e
w
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
,
a
n
d
i
n
a
l
l
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
n
i
t
s
a
t
t
i
m
e
o
f
s
a
l
e
o
r
r
e
n
t
a
l
,
i
n
co
n
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
S
t
a
t
e
l
a
w
.
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
U
s
e
t
h
e
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
S
c
e
n
e
t
o
p
u
b
l
i
c
i
z
e
f
i
r
e
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
me
t
h
o
d
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
.
A
d
o
p
t
a
n
o
rd
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
t
h
e
s
m
o
k
e
d
e
t
e
c
t
o
r
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
Ch
a
p
t
e
r
1
6
.
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
1
3
:
W
o
o
d
S
h
a
k
e
R
o
o
f
A
b
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
Ad
o
p
t
a
n
a
g
g
r
e
s
s
i
v
e
w
o
o
d
s
h
a
k
e
r
o
o
f
a
b
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
t
o
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
t
h
a
t
a
n
y
r
o
o
f
t
h
a
t
i
s
2
5
%
o
r
m
o
r
e
re
p
l
a
c
e
d
m
u
s
t
u
s
e
f
i
r
e
r
e
t
a
r
d
a
n
t
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
f
o
r
a
ll
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
s
h
a
k
e
s
.
W
o
o
d
s
h
a
k
e
r
o
o
f
s
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
ou
t
l
a
w
e
d
i
n
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
r
l
i
k
e
l
i
h
o
o
d
t
o
ca
t
c
h
f
i
r
e
f
r
o
m
e
x
t
e
r
n
a
l
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
b
u
r
n
i
n
g
em
b
e
r
s
f
r
o
m
c
h
i
m
n
e
y
s
.
T
h
e
l
a
w
a
l
r
e
a
d
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
f
i
r
e
re
s
i
s
t
a
n
t
s
h
a
k
e
s
o
n
a
n
y
r
o
o
f
t
h
a
t
i
s
5
0
%
o
r
m
o
r
e
re
p
a
i
r
e
d
o
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
d
.
GO
A
L
ED
:
Cr
e
a
t
e
a
A
n
A
l
l
-
W
e
a
t
h
e
r
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
R
o
a
d
S
y
s
t
e
m
t
o
S
e
r
v
e
R
u
r
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
13
1
4
:
R
o
a
d
w
a
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
In
v
o
l
v
e
t
h
e
F
i
r
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
f
p
u
b
li
c
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
s
f
o
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
an
d
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
.
A
t
t
e
m
p
t
t
o
en
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
s
h
a
v
e
f
r
e
q
u
e
n
t
m
e
d
i
a
n
br
e
a
k
s
f
o
r
t
i
m
e
l
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
14
1
5
:
D
e
a
d
-
E
n
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
A
c
c
e
s
s
Al
l
o
w
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
o
f
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
a
n
e
m
er
g
e
n
c
y
f
o
r
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
s
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
t
h
a
t
h
a
v
e
d
e
a
d
-
e
n
d
pu
b
l
i
c
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
l
o
n
g
e
r
t
h
a
n
1
,
0
0
0
f
e
e
t
or
f
i
n
d
a
s
e
c
o
n
d
a
r
y
m
e
a
n
s
o
f
a
c
c
e
s
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
15
1
6
:
H
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
A
c
c
e
s
s
R
o
u
t
e
s
Re
q
u
i
r
e
n
e
w
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
h
a
v
e
f
r
e
q
u
e
n
t
g
r
ad
e
b
r
e
a
k
s
i
n
a
c
c
e
s
s
r
o
u
t
e
s
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
a
t
i
m
e
l
y
re
s
p
o
n
s
e
f
r
o
m
f
i
r
e
p
e
r
s
o
n
n
e
l
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
16
1
7
:
H
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
R
o
a
d
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
Re
q
u
i
r
e
n
e
w
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
c
c
e
s
s
ro
a
d
s
t
o
m
e
e
t
F
i
r
e
C
o
d
e
a
n
d
C
i
t
y
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
17
1
8
:
P
r
i
v
a
t
e
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
i
c
S
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
G
a
t
e
s
Di
s
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
e
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
i
c
se
c
u
r
i
t
y
g
a
t
e
s
t
h
a
t
a
c
t
a
s
a
b
a
r
r
i
e
r
t
o
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
pe
r
s
o
n
n
e
l
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
F
e
n
c
e
E
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
a
f
e
n
c
e
e
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
e
l
e
c
t
r
o
n
i
c
s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
g
a
t
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
A
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
G
a
t
e
s
.
W
h
e
r
e
e
l
ec
t
r
o
n
i
c
s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
g
a
t
e
s
a
r
e
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
,
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
t
h
e
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
n
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
1
5
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
k
e
y
s
w
i
t
c
h
.
GO
A
L
FE
:
En
s
u
r
e
Av
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
W
a
t
e
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
i
n
t
h
e
H
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
a
n
d
C
a
n
y
o
n
A
r
e
a
s
Po
l
i
c
y
-
6
-
18
1
9
:
E
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
o
f
W
a
t
e
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
w
a
t
e
r
c
o
m
p
a
n
i
e
s
t
o
e
x
t
e
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
in
t
o
t
h
e
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
a
n
d
c
a
n
y
o
n
a
r
e
a
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
1
9
:
W
a
t
e
r
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
D
e
m
a
n
d
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
Pr
o
a
c
t
i
v
e
l
y
r
e
d
u
c
e
b
o
t
h
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
u
s
ag
e
c
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
m
e
e
t
t
h
e
s
t
a
t
e
w
i
d
e
u
r
b
a
n
wa
t
e
r
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
t
a
r
g
e
t
i
s
1
0
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
b
y
2
0
1
5
a
n
d
2
0
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
b
y
2
0
2
0
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
U
r
b
a
n
W
a
t
e
r
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
De
v
e
l
o
p
a
n
U
r
b
a
n
W
a
t
e
r
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
t
h
a
t
i
n
c
l
ud
e
s
w
a
t
e
r
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
a
n
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
,
as
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
U
r
b
a
n
W
a
t
e
r
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
A
c
t
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
S
t
a
t
e
W
a
t
e
r
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
Co
m
p
l
y
w
i
t
h
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
S
t
a
t
e’
s
2
0
x
2
0
2
0
W
a
t
e
r
C
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3.
R
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
W
a
t
e
r
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
r
e
c
y
c
l
e
d
w
a
t
e
r
w
h
e
r
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
at
e
,
c
o
s
t
e
f
f
e
c
t
i
v
e
,
s
a
f
e
a
n
d
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
l
y
su
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
l
e
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Legal Requirement
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
2
0
:
G
r
o
w
t
h
C
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
c
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
w
a
t
e
r
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
c
o
m
p
a
n
i
e
s
a
n
d
t
h
e
F
i
r
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
k
e
e
p
wa
t
e
r
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
i
n
p
a
c
e
w
i
t
h
g
r
o
w
t
h
a
n
d
f
i
r
e
f
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
n
e
e
d
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
2
1
:
F
i
r
e
F
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
N
e
e
d
s
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
w
a
t
e
r
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
to
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
F
i
r
e
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
f
i
re
f
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
n
e
e
d
s
w
h
e
n
u
p
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
pu
b
l
i
c
wa
t
e
r
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
2
2
:
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
F
i
r
e
S
p
r
i
n
k
l
e
r
s
Re
q
u
i
r
e
f
i
r
e
s
p
r
i
n
k
l
e
r
s
i
n
n
e
w
r
e
si
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
i
n
hi
l
l
s
i
d
e
a
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
f
l
a
g
l
o
t
s
.
GO
A
L
GF
:
En
s
u
r
e
Hi
g
h
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
P
o
l
i
c
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
h
a
t
M
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
’
s
Lo
w
Cr
i
m
e
R
a
t
e
Lo
w
an
d
E
n
s
u
r
e
a
H
i
g
h
L
e
v
e
l
o
f
P
u
b
l
i
c
S
a
f
e
t
y
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
22
2
3
:
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
A
w
a
r
e
n
e
s
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
S
s
up
p
o
r
t
t
h
e
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
W
a
t
c
h
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
s si
m
i
l
a
r
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
in
t
e
n
d
e
d
t
o
h
e
l
p
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
p
r
e
v
e
n
t
c
r
i
m
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
s
o
c
i
a
l
i
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
23
2
4
:
P
u
b
l
i
c
P
e
r
i
m
e
t
e
r
R
o
a
d
s
f
o
r
P
a
r
k
s
En
c
i
r
c
l
e
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
p
a
r
k
s
w
i
t
h
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
r
o
a
d
to
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
v
i
s
u
a
l
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
w
h
e
n
e
v
e
r
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
24
2
5
:
C
r
i
m
e
P
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
i
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
t
h
e
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
d
e
s
i
g
n
an
d
c
r
i
m
e
p
r
e
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
i
n
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
n
g
a
l
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
25
2
6
:
F
i
s
c
a
l
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
1
6
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Re
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
f
i
s
c
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
h
e
r
i
f
f
a
n
d
C
i
ty
o
f
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
w
h
e
n
a
p
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
mi
x
e
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
26
2
7
:
P
r
e
-
h
e
a
r
i
n
g
R
e
v
i
e
w
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
C
o
u
n
t
y
S
h
e
r
i
f
f
re
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
o
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
en
t
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
s
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
a
n
d
pu
b
l
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
GO
A
L
HG
:
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
io
n
P
e
o
p
l
e
a
n
d
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
R
i
s
k
s
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
H
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
M
a
t
e
ri
a
l
s
a
n
d
E
x
p
o
s
u
r
e
t
o
El
e
c
t
r
o
m
a
g
n
e
t
i
c
F
i
e
l
d
s
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
27
2
8
:
H
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
S
t
o
r
a
g
e
a
n
d
D
i
s
p
o
s
a
l
Re
q
u
i
r
e
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
a
n
d
d
i
s
p
o
s
a
l
o
f
h
a
z
a
rd
o
u
s
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
t
o
p
r
e
v
e
n
t
l
e
a
k
a
g
e
,
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
ex
p
l
o
s
i
o
n
s
,
f
i
r
e
o
r
t
h
e
r
e
l
e
a
s
e
o
f
h
a
r
m
f
u
l
f
u
m
e
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
28
2
9
:
P
r
o
x
i
m
i
t
y
o
f
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
t
o
H
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
As
s
e
s
s
f
u
t
u
r
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
’
e
x
p
o
s
u
r
e
t
o
h
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
w
h
e
n
n
e
w
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
fr
ch
i
l
d
c
a
r
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
r
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
i
n
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
a
n
d
m
a
n
u
f
a
c
t
u
r
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
s
.
D
o
n
o
t
a
l
l
o
w
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
r
c
h
i
l
d
c
a
r
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
f
s
u
c
h
h
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
c
a
n
n
o
t
b
e
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
e
d
t
o
a
n
a
c
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
le
v
e
l
o
f
r
i
s
k
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
29
3
0
:
E
l
e
c
t
r
o
m
a
g
n
e
t
i
c
F
i
e
l
d
s
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
f
r
o
m
El
e
c
t
r
o
m
a
g
n
e
t
i
c
F
i
e
l
d
s
i
n
t
h
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
r
e
v
i
e
w
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
30
3
1
:
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
E
e
nc
o
u
r
a
g
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
t
o
u
s
e
n
o
n-
a
n
d
l
e
s
s
-
h
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
,
e
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
l
y
le
s
s
t
o
x
i
c
p
e
s
t
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
p
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
,
t
o
s
l
o
w
t
h
e
g
e
n
e
r
at
i
o
n
o
f
n
e
w
h
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
w
a
s
t
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
i
n
g
d
i
s
p
o
s
a
l
th
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
c
o
u
n
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
31
3
2
:
H
o
u
s
e
h
o
l
d
H
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
W
a
s
t
e
s
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
S
s
up
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
he
l
p
f
u
n
d
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
-
w
i
d
e
H
o
u
s
e
h
o
l
d
Ha
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
W
a
s
t
e
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
,
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
n
d
s
m
a
l
l
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
t
h
e
o
pp
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
t
o
p
r
o
p
e
r
l
y
d
i
s
p
o
s
e
o
f
h
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
wa
s
t
e
.
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
f
o
r
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
s
a
n
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
a
co
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
t
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
y
t
o
p
r
o
p
e
r
l
y
d
i
s
p
o
s
e
o
f
ha
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
w
a
s
t
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
.
P
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
na
l
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
a
b
o
u
t
t
h
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
i
n
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
Sc
e
n
e
,
w
e
b
s
i
t
e
a
n
d
i
n
b
r
o
c
h
u
r
e
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
ho
u
t
t
h
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
32
3
3
:
H
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
W
a
s
t
e
D
u
m
p
i
n
g
In
f
o
r
m
M
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
c
h
a
n
n
e
l
s
t
o
th
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
an
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
a
b
o
u
t
t
h
e
i
l
l
e
g
a
l
i
t
y
a
n
d
d
a
n
g
er
o
f
d
u
m
p
i
n
g
h
a
z
a
r
d
o
u
s
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
a
n
d
w
a
s
t
e
i
n
th
e
s
t
o
r
m
d
r
a
i
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
o
r
i
n
c
r
e
e
k
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
GO
A
L
IJ
:
En
s
u
r
e
a
A
H
i
g
h
L
e
v
e
l
o
f
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
n
e
s
s
t
o
C
o
p
e
wi
t
h
B
o
t
h
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
o
r
H
u
m
a
n
-
C
a
u
s
e
d
D
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
s
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
33
3
4
:
P
r
o
m
o
t
e
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
n
e
s
s
Di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
m
u
l
t
i
-
h
a
z
a
r
d
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
n
e
s
s
i
n
f
o
rm
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
a
l
l
t
h
r
e
a
t
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
pl
a
n
.
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
l
l
b
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
C
a
r
d
io
-
P
u
l
m
o
n
a
r
y
R
e
s
u
s
c
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
(
C
P
R
)
,
F
i
r
s
t
A
i
d
a
n
d
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
T
e
a
m
(
C
E
R
T
)
t
r
a
i
n
in
g
,
l
e
c
t
u
r
e
s
a
n
d
s
e
m
i
n
a
r
s
o
n
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
n
e
s
s
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
m
o
n
t
h
l
y
s
a
f
e
t
y
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
S
c
e
n
e
,
p
o
s
t
i
n
g
o
f
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
1
7
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
th
e
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
n
e
s
s
w
e
b
s
i
t
e
a
n
d
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
of
v
i
d
e
o
a
n
d
p
r
i
n
t
e
d
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
a
t
t
h
e
l
i
b
r
a
r
y
.
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
34
3
5
:
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
T
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
T
t
ra
i
n
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
s
i
n
d
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
n
e
s
s
,
f
i
r
s
t
a
i
d
a
n
d
Ca
r
d
i
o
-
P
u
l
m
o
n
a
r
y
R
e
s
u
s
c
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
(CP
R
).
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
E
x
e
r
c
i
s
e
s
.
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
e
x
e
r
c
i
se
s
r
e
g
u
l
a
r
l
y
t
o
u
p
d
a
t
e
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
6
.
3
5
:
S
e
a
L
e
v
e
l
R
i
s
e
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
En
s
u
r
e
a
l
l
a
r
e
a
s
i
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
a
r
e
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
l
y
p
r
o
t
e
c
te
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
a
f
f
e
c
t
s
o
f
s
e
a
l
e
v
e
l
r
i
s
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
R
i
s
i
n
g
S
e
a
L
e
v
e
l
Re
g
u
l
a
r
l
y
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
,
s
t
a
t
e
,
a
n
d
f
e
d
e
r
a
l
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
o
n
r
i
s
i
n
g
s
e
a
l
e
v
e
l
s
i
n
t
h
e
S
a
n
F
r
a
n
c
i
s
c
o
Ba
y
a
n
d
m
a
j
o
r
t
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
i
e
s
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
i
f
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
d
a
p
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
t
o
ad
d
r
e
s
s
f
l
o
o
d
i
n
g
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
.
T
h
i
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
F
E
M
A
f
l
o
o
d
m
a
p
u
p
d
a
t
e
s
t
o
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
a
r
e
a
s
i
n
t
h
e
ci
t
y
s
u
s
c
e
p
t
i
b
l
e
t
o
s
e
a
l
e
v
e
l
r
i
s
e
,
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
i
n
g
c
h
a
n
ge
s
t
o
s
t
a
t
e
a
n
d
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
s
e
a
a
n
d
b
a
y
l
e
v
e
l
r
i
s
e
es
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
,
a
n
d
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
m
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
li
t
i
e
s
o
n
f
l
o
o
d
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
s
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
F
l
o
o
d
I
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
R
a
t
e
M
a
p
s
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
t
o
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
,
a
s
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
,
u
p
-
t
o
-
d
a
t
e
F
l
o
o
d
In
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
R
a
t
e
M
a
p
s
(
F
I
R
M
)
t
h
a
t
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
r
i
s
i
n
g
s
e
a
le
v
e
l
s
a
n
d
c
h
a
n
g
i
n
g
f
l
o
o
d
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Legal Requirement
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
1
8
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
3
6
:
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
o
f
V
o
l
u
n
t
e
e
r
G
r
o
u
p
s
Cl
e
a
r
l
y
d
e
f
i
n
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
o
f
v
o
l
u
n
t
ee
r
g
r
o
u
p
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
a
l
o
c
a
l
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
G
r
o
u
p
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
pr
e
-
d
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
t
h
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
g
r
o
u
p
s
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
e
d
p
o
s
t
-
d
i
s
as
t
e
r
a
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
,
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
o
r
a
n
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
a
d
v
i
ce
o
f
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
A
t
t
o
r
n
e
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
R
e
d
C
r
o
s
s
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
I
i
mp
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
R
e
d
C
r
o
s
s
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
u
n
d
e
r
th
e
d
i
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
o
f
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
(
C
it
y
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
)
d
u
r
i
n
g
a
d
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
.
T
h
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
R
e
d
Cr
o
s
s
i
s
t
h
e
C
o
n
g
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
l
y
m
a
n
d
a
t
e
d
m
a
s
s
c
a
r
e
a
n
d
sh
e
l
t
e
r
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
i
n
t
h
e
U
n
i
t
e
d
S
t
a
t
e
s
.
T
h
e
S
a
n
t
a
Cl
a
r
a
V
a
l
l
e
y
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
o
f
t
h
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
R
e
d
C
r
o
s
s
h
a
s
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
t
h
a
l
l
s
e
c
o
n
d
a
r
y
s
c
h
o
o
l
di
s
t
r
i
c
t
s
i
n
t
h
e
c
o
u
n
t
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
i
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
ie
s
a
s
m
a
s
s
c
a
r
e
a
n
d
s
h
e
l
t
e
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
a
n
y
lo
c
a
l
l
y
pr
o
c
l
a
i
m
e
d
a
n
d
de
c
l
a
r
e
d
st
a
t
e
s
o
f
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
o
r
di
s
a
s
t
e
r
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3.
S
h
e
l
t
e
r
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
.
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
a
n
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
h
e
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
s
h
e
l
t
e
r
s
i
t
e
s
t
o
pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
p
a
c
e
f
o
r
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
s
u
p
p
l
y
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
e
r
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
3
7
:
A
m
a
t
e
u
r
R
a
d
i
o
O
p
e
r
a
t
o
r
s
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
c
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
a
n
d
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
A
m
a
t
e
u
r
R
a
d
i
o
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
Se
r
v
i
c
e
(
C
A
R
E
S
)
t
o
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
f
o
r
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
co
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
n
e
e
d
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
3
8
:
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
C
e
n
t
e
r
Tr
a
i
n
E
n
s
u
r
e
o
n
g
o
i
n
g
t
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
o
f
id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
ci
t
y
C
i
t
y
em
p
l
o
y
e
e
s
s
t
a
f
f
on
t
h
e
i
r
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
s
/
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
i
n
th
e
E
O
C
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
3
9
:
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
P
u
b
l
i
c
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
De
v
e
l
o
p
a
n
d
m
M
ai
n
t
a
i
n
a
n
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
P
u
b
l
i
c
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
pr
o
g
r
a
m
t
o
b
e
u
s
e
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
s
i
t
u
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
1
9
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
t
h
o
d
s
.
U
s
e
t
h
e
l
o
c
a
l
TV
c
h
a
n
n
e
l
,
t
h
e
I
n
t
e
r
n
e
t
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
me
t
h
o
d
s
t
o
t
r
a
n
s
m
i
t
i
n
f
o
r
m
at
i
o
n
t
o
t
h
e
c
i
t
i
z
e
n
r
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
P
u
b
l
i
c
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
O
f
f
i
c
e
.
A
c
t
i
v
a
t
e
t
he
P
u
b
l
i
c
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
O
f
f
i
c
e
e
i
t
h
e
r
i
n
t
h
e
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
Op
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
C
e
n
t
e
r
o
r
i
n
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
a
s
q
u
i
c
k
l
y
a
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
.
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
4
0
:
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
n
e
s
s
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
S
s
up
p
o
r
t
t
h
e
C
E
R
T
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
b
a
s
e
d
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
p
r
ep
a
r
e
d
n
e
s
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
on
g
o
i
n
g
co
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
C
E
R
T
s
i
n
o
t
h
e
r
c
i
t
i
e
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
4
1
:
D
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
Con
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
c
oo
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
th
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
a
n
d
lo
c
a
l
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
c
l
i
n
i
c
s
t
o
en
s
u
r
e
pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
n
e
s
s
a
n
d
pr
o
v
i
d
e
d
i
s
a
s
t
e
r
m
e
d
i
c
a
l
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
.
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
E
R
T
m
e
m
b
e
r
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
th
e
C
i
t
y
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
y
a
r
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
m
e
d
i
c
a
l
c
a
r
e
f
i
r
s
t
a
i
d
a
t
t
h
e
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
l
e
v
e
l
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
Me
m
o
r
a
n
d
u
m
o
f
U
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g
(
M
O
U
)
. De
v
e
l
o
p
a
M
e
m
o
r
a
n
d
u
m
o
f
U
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
n
d
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
lo
c
a
l
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
c
l
i
n
i
c
s
.
T
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
’
s
r
o
l
e
a
n
d
i
n
v
o
l
v
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
p
r
o
c
l
a
i
m
e
d
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
i
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
M
O
U
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
GO
A
L
JK
:
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
io
n
P
e
o
p
l
e
a
n
d
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
f
r
o
m
R
i
s
k
s
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
F
l
o
o
d
s
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
4
2
:
E
v
a
c
u
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
p
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
a
n
d
u
p
d
a
t
e
p
e
r
i
o
d
i
c
a
l
l
y
a
n
e
v
a
c
u
a
t
i
o
n
m
a
p
f
o
r
t
h
e
f
l
o
o
d
h
a
z
a
r
d
a
r
e
a
s
a
n
d
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
i
t
t
o
t
h
e
ge
n
e
r
a
l
p
u
b
l
i
c
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
4
3
:
F
l
o
o
d
I
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
M
a
p
R
a
t
e
s
En
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
F
E
M
A
F
l
o
o
d
I
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
R
a
t
e
M
a
p
s
a
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
.
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
43
4
4
:
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
t
o
D
a
m
F
a
i
l
u
r
e
En
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
i
s
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
t
o
r
e
s
p
o
n
d
t
o
a
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
a
m
f
a
i
l
u
r
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
a
n
d
E
v
a
c
u
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
.
M
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
d
a
m
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
a
n
d
e
v
a
c
u
a
t
i
o
n
p
l
a
n
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
a
l
e
r
t
,
w
a
r
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
a
n
d
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
s
i
g
n
a
g
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
t
o
D
a
m
F
a
i
l
u
r
e
.
Con
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
c
oo
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
d
a
m
-
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
e
v
a
c
u
a
t
i
o
n
pl
a
n
s
an
d
a
l
e
r
t
/
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
wi
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
S
u
n
n
y
v
a
l
e
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
be
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
t
w
o
c
i
t
i
e
s
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
s
l
i
f
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
A
l
s
o
w
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
o
t
h
e
r
n
e
i
gh
b
o
r
h
i
n
g
c
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
co
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
c
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
d
u
r
i
n
g
a
d
a
m
-
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
44
4
5
:
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
U
s
e
s
i
n
t
h
e
F
l
o
o
d
P
l
a
i
n
Al
l
o
w
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
u
s
e
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
n
o
w
e
xc
l
u
s
i
v
e
l
y
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
f
l
o
o
d
p
l
a
i
n
t
o
r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
t
h
e
i
r
pr
e
s
e
n
t
u
s
e
o
r
t
o
b
e
u
s
e
d
f
o
r
a
g
r
i
c
u
l
t
u
r
e
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
46
4
5
:
N
e
w
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
F
l
o
o
d
P
l
a
i
n
s
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
A
d
o
p
t
s
t
r
i
n
g
e
n
t
la
n
d
u
s
e
,
z
o
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
c
o
d
e
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
l
i
m
i
t
i
n
g
n
e
w
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
2
0
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
a
l
r
e
a
d
y
u
r
b
a
n
i
z
e
d
f
l
o
o
d
h
a
z
a
r
d
ar
e
a
s
r
e
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
F
e
d
e
r
a
l
F
l
o
o
d
I
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
Ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
o
r
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1.
F
i
n
i
s
h
F
l
o
o
r
L
e
v
e
l
.
Re
q
u
i
r
e
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
th
e
f
i
r
s
t
f
l
o
o
r
f
i
n
i
s
h
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
a
l
l
h
a
b
i
t
a
b
l
e
s
p
a
c
e
o
f
n
e
w
or
su
b
s
t
a
n
t
i
a
l
l
y
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
d
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
b
o
v
e
t
h
e
i
n
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
a
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
e
d
1
0
0
-
y
e
a
r
f
l
o
o
d
i
n
ac
c
o
r
d
a
n
c
e
w
i
t
h
C
i
t
y
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2.
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
F
l
o
o
d
Z
o
n
e
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
.
Co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
ma
k
e
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
t
o
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
P
u
b
l
i
s
h
a
de
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
f
l
o
o
d
z
o
n
e
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
a
m
a
p
o
f
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
f
l
o
o
d
h
a
z
a
r
d
a
r
e
a
s
in
o
n
th
e
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
Sc
e
n
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
w
e
b
s
i
t
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
3.
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
A
l
l
o
w
n
e
w
u
r
b
a
n
d
e
v
e
lo
p
m
e
n
t
o
n
l
y
w
h
e
n
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
a
r
e
in
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
at
n
e
w
u
r
b
a
n
r
u
n
o
f
f
d
o
e
s
n
o
t
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
f
l
o
o
d
r
i
s
k
s
el
s
e
w
h
e
r
e
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
4.
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
F
l
o
o
d
I
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
R
a
t
i
ng
S
y
s
t
e
m
.
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
p
a
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
i
n
g
i
n
t
h
e
Na
t
i
o
n
a
l
F
l
o
o
d
I
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
(
N
F
I
P
)
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
R
a
t
i
n
g
S
y
s
t
e
m
(
C
R
S
)
.
T
h
e
C
R
S
i
s
a
v
o
l
u
n
t
a
r
y
in
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
t
h
a
t
r
e
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
s
a
n
d
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
s
co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
f
l
o
o
d
p
l
a
i
n
m
a
n
a
g
e
me
n
t
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
t
h
a
t
ex
c
e
e
d
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
N
F
I
P
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
F
l
o
o
d
i
n
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
pr
e
m
i
u
m
r
a
t
e
s
f
o
r
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
o
w
n
e
r
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
ma
y
b
e
d
i
s
c
o
u
n
t
e
d
t
o
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
t
h
e
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
f
l
o
o
d
r
i
s
k
r
e
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
c
t
i
o
n
s
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
t
h
r
e
e
go
a
l
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
R
S
,
w
h
i
c
h
a
r
e
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
f
l
o
o
d
d
a
m
a
ge
t
o
i
n
s
u
r
a
b
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
;
s
t
r
e
n
g
t
h
e
n
a
n
d
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
t
h
e
in
s
u
r
a
n
c
e
a
s
p
e
c
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
N
F
I
P
;
a
n
d
e
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
a
co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
a
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
t
o
f
l
o
o
d
p
l
a
i
n
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
.
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
47
4
6
:
D
w
e
l
l
i
n
g
s
i
n
N
a
t
u
r
a
l
F
l
o
o
d
P
l
a
i
n
Re
g
u
l
a
t
e
c
l
o
s
e
l
y
a
l
l
t
y
p
e
s
o
f
h
a
b
i
t
a
b
l
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
f
l
o
o
d
p
l
a
i
n
s
.
T
h
i
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
p
r
o
h
i
b
i
t
i
n
g
f
i
l
l
ma
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
a
n
d
o
b
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
s
t
h
a
t
m
a
y
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
f
l
o
o
d
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
do
w
n
s
t
r
e
a
m
or
m
o
d
i
f
y
t
h
e
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
47
4
8
:
H
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
G
r
a
d
i
n
g
Re
s
t
r
i
c
t
t
h
e
e
x
t
e
n
t
a
n
d
t
i
m
i
n
g
o
f
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
g
r
a
d
in
g
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
A
p
r
i
l
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
O
c
t
o
b
e
r
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
pe
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
b
o
n
d
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
t
i
m
e
t
o
gu
a
r
a
n
t
e
e
t
h
e
r
e
p
a
i
r
o
f
a
n
y
e
r
o
s
i
o
n
d
a
m
a
g
e
.
A
l
l
gr
a
d
e
d
s
l
o
p
e
s
m
u
s
t
b
e
p
l
a
n
t
e
d
a
s
s
o
o
n
a
s
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
a
l
a
f
t
e
r
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
49
4
8
:
S
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
W
a
t
e
r
S
t
o
r
a
g
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
As
s
u
r
e
t
h
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
i
n
t
e
g
r
i
t
y
of
w
a
t
e
r
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
o
t
h
e
r
A
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
.
Wo
r
k
c
l
o
s
e
l
y
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
S
a
n
J
o
s
e
W
a
t
e
r
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
a
n
d
ow
n
e
r
s
o
f
o
t
h
e
r
w
a
t
e
r
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
an
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
t
o
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
t
h
e
s
t
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
al
l
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
w
a
t
e
r
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
i
m
p
r
ov
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
s
u
c
h
a
s
:
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
l
i
n
e
s
,
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
ot
h
e
r
s
y
s
t
e
m
-
c
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
GO
A
L
KL
:
Ma
i
n
t
a
i
n
a
A
C
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
l
e
N
o
i
s
e
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
F
u
t
u
r
e
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
s
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
49
5
0
:
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
D
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
E
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
Us
e
t
h
e
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
C
o
m
p
a
t
i
b
il
i
t
y
f
o
r
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
N
o
i
s
e
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
2
1
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
s
c
h
a
r
t
a
n
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
Co
d
e
t
o
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
s
.
GO
A
L
LM
:
R
e
d
u
c
e
d th
e
No
i
s
e
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
f
r
o
m
o
f
Ma
j
o
r
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
a
n
d
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
s
o
n
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
50
5
1
:
F
r
e
e
w
a
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
N
o
i
s
e
En
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
r
o
a
d
s
a
n
d
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
l
o
n
g
I-
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
85
a
n
d
I
-
2
8
0
a
r
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
a
n
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
d
i
n
a
w
a
y
th
a
t
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
s
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
n
o
i
s
e
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
52
5
1
:
S
t
r
i
c
t
e
r
S
t
a
t
e
N
o
i
s
e
L
a
w
s
Su
p
p
o
r
t
e
n
a
c
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
s
t
r
i
c
t
e
r
sS
ta
t
e
l
a
w
s
o
n
n
o
i
s
e
e
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
fr
o
m
n
e
w
m
o
t
o
r
v
e
h
i
c
l
e
s
a
n
d
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
e
x
i
s
ti
n
g
s
t
r
e
e
t
l
a
w
s
o
n
n
o
i
s
e
e
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
52
5
3
:
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
N
e
e
d
P
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
Re
v
i
e
w
t
h
e
n
e
e
d
s
o
f
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
c
e
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
an
d
m
a
k
e
t
h
e
m
a
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
o
v
e
r
t
h
e
c
o
n
v
e
n
i
e
n
t
m
o
v
e
me
n
t
o
f
c
o
m
m
u
t
e
o
r
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
w
h
e
r
e
p
r
a
c
t
i
c
a
l
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
53
5
4
:
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
C
a
l
m
i
n
g
S
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
o
i
s
e
Ev
a
l
u
a
t
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
d
i
s
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
ro
u
g
h
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
en
h
a
n
c
e
d
p
a
v
i
n
g
a
n
d
mo
d
i
f
i
e
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
.
Ex
a
m
p
l
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
m
e
a
n
d
e
r
i
n
g
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
,
di
v
e
r
t
e
r
s
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
i
s
l
a
n
d
s
a
n
d
w
i
d
e
pa
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
r
i
p
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
Lo
c
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
.
Mo
d
i
f
y
s
t
r
e
e
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
t
o
m
i
n
i
m
i
ze
n
o
i
s
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
t
o
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
55
5
4
:
N
o
i
s
e
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
b
y
R
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
n
g
T
r
u
c
k
s
Wo
r
k
t
o
w
a
r
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
n
o
i
s
e
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
o
n
g
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
by
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
n
g
q
u
a
r
r
y
t
r
u
c
k
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
e
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
l
y
d
u
r
i
n
g
l
a
t
e
e
v
e
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
e
a
r
l
y
m
o
r
n
i
n
g
h
o
u
r
s
.
I
t
i
s
p
r
e
f
e
r
a
b
l
e
th
a
t
t
h
e
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
b
e
v
o
l
u
n
t
a
r
y
.
E
n
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
t
o
t
r
u
c
k
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
rt
,
s
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
l
l
y
r
a
i
l
,
w
h
e
n
f
e
a
s
i
b
l
e
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
55
5
6
:
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
N
o
i
s
e
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
H
a
n
s
o
n
P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
e
T
r
u
c
k
s
Wo
r
k
t
o
c
a
r
r
y
o
u
t
n
o
i
s
e
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
t
o
d
i
m
i
n
i
s
h
n
o
i
s
e
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
H
a
n
s
o
n
P
e
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
e
t
r
u
c
k
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
fo
r
h
o
m
e
s
n
e
a
r
F
o
o
t
h
i
l
l
a
n
d
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
ds
.
T
h
e
s
e
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
r
u
c
k
sp
e
e
d
a
n
d
t
h
e
v
o
l
u
m
e
o
f
t
r
u
c
k
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
Re
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
’
s
U
s
e
P
e
r
m
i
t
.
Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
t
o
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
t
h
e
n
u
m
b
e
r
of
t
r
u
c
k
s
,
t
h
e
i
r
s
p
e
e
d
a
n
d
n
o
i
s
e
l
e
v
e
l
s
al
o
n
g
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
,
t
o
t
h
e
ex
t
e
n
t
al
l
o
w
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
U
s
e
Pe
r
m
i
t
.
E
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
r
e
s
t
r
i
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
mo
n
i
t
o
r
e
d
a
n
d
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
57
5
6
:
R
o
a
d
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
R
e
d
u
c
e
T
r
u
c
k
I
m
p
a
c
t
s
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
r
o
a
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
, s
u
c
h
a
s
m
e
d
i
a
n
s
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
,
n
o
i
s
e
a
t
t
e
n
u
a
t
i
n
g
a
s
p
h
a
l
t
,
a
n
d
th
e
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
l
a
n
e
s
ot
h
e
r
m
e
t
h
o
d
s
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
q
u
a
r
r
y
t
r
u
c
k
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
GO
A
L
MN
:
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
A
r
e
a
s
Pr
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
as
M
u
c
h
a
s
P
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
f
r
o
m
I
n
t
r
u
s
i
v
e
N
o
n
-
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
N
o
i
s
e
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
58
5
7
:
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
D
e
l
i
v
e
r
y
A
r
e
a
s
Be
s
u
r
e
R
e
v
i
e
w
n
e
w
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
or
a
n
d
in
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
pl
a
n
t
h
e
i
r
t
s
o
t
h
a
t
d
e
l
i
v
e
r
y
a
r
e
a
s
so
t
h
e
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
2
2
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
ar
e
lo
c
a
t
e
d
aw
a
y
f
r
o
m
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
o
r
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
h
o
m
e
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
58
5
9
:
D
e
l
i
v
e
r
y
H
o
u
r
s
Ac
t
i
v
e
l
y
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
Se
c
t
i
o
n
1
0
.
4
8
o
f
th
e
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
pr
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
li
m
i
t
i
n
g
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
de
l
i
v
e
r
y
h
o
u
r
s
a
d
j
o
i
n
i
n
g
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
59
6
0
:
N
o
i
s
e
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
T
e
c
h
n
i
q
u
e
s
Re
q
u
i
r
e
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
a
n
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
of
t
e
c
h
n
i
q
u
e
s
t
o
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
t
h
e
e
ff
e
c
t
s
o
f
n
o
i
s
e
f
r
o
m
i
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
eq
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
e
s
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
n
e
a
r
h
o
m
e
s
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
60
6
1
:
H
o
u
r
s
o
f
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
W
o
r
k
Re
s
t
r
i
c
t
n
o
n
-
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
b
u
i
l
d
in
g
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
w
o
r
k
n
e
a
r
ho
m
e
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
e
v
e
n
i
n
g
,
e
a
r
l
y
m
o
r
n
i
n
g
,
a
n
d
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
b
y
e
n
f
o
r
c
i
n
g
t
h
e
n
o
i
s
e
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
t
h
e
Mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
61
6
2
:
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
M
a
i
n
te
n
a
n
c
e
A
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
Re
g
u
l
a
t
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
nc
e
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
e
s
.
E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
a
n
d
e
n
f
o
r
ce
r
e
a
s
o
n
a
b
l
e
a
l
l
o
w
a
b
l
e
p
e
r
i
o
d
s
of
t
h
e
d
a
y
,
f
o
r
w
e
e
k
d
a
y
s
,
w
e
e
k
e
n
d
s
a
n
d
h
o
l
i
d
a
y
s
fo
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
a
c
t
i
v
i
t
i
es
.
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
co
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
s
t
o
u
s
e
on
l
y
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
n
g
th
e
b
e
s
t
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
no
i
s
e
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
te
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
t
o
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
e
x
c
e
s
s
i
v
e
n
o
i
s
e
a
n
d
v
i
b
r
a
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
s
u
c
h
a
s
p
i
l
e
d
r
i
v
e
r
s
,
ja
c
k
h
a
m
m
e
r
s
,
a
n
d
v
i
b
r
a
t
o
r
y
r
o
l
l
e
r
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
63
6
2
:
S
o
u
n
d
W
a
l
l
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
Ex
e
r
c
i
s
e
d
i
s
c
r
e
t
i
o
n
i
n
r
e
q
u
i
r
i
n
g
s
o
u
n
d
w
a
l
l
s
t
o
b
e
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
al
l
o
t
h
e
r
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
o
f
n
o
i
s
e
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
e
x
pl
o
r
e
d
a
n
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
s
o
u
n
d
w
a
l
l
b
l
e
n
d
s
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
.
S
o
u
n
d
w
a
l
l
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
6
4
:
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
o
n
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
N
o
i
s
e
I
n
t
r
u
s
i
o
n
Re
q
u
i
r
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
t
o
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
a
l
l
s
e
ct
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
f
o
r
e
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
so
u
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
(
S
e
c
.
1
2
0
8
A
.
8
.
1
)
.
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
6
5
:
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
o
n
I
n
t
e
r
i
o
r
N
o
i
s
e
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
t
o
e
n
f
o
r
c
e
a
l
l
se
c
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
t
h
e
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
r
e
l
a
t
i
n
g
to
i
n
t
e
r
d
w
e
l
l
i
n
g
s
o
u
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
m
i
ss
i
o
n
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
(
S
e
c
.
1
2
0
8
A
.
1
.
6
)
.
GO
A
L
NO
: D
e
s
i
g
n
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
De
s
i
g
n
e
d
to
Mi
n
i
m
i
z
e
D
i
m
i
n
i
s
h
No
i
s
e
Po
l
i
c
y
6
-
63
6
6
:
Ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
P
o
l
i
c
y
6
-
6
3
6
4
t
o
E
x
t
e
r
i
or
S
o
u
n
d
T
r
a
n
s
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
f
o
r
N
e
w
Si
n
g
l
e
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
H
o
m
e
s
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
p
p
l
y
i
n
g
A
p
p
l
y
t
h
e
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
C
o
d
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
en
t
s
f
o
r
e
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
s
o
u
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
co
n
t
r
o
l
(S
e
c
.
1
2
0
8
A
.
8
.
1
)
to
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
n
e
w
s
i
n
g
l
e
-
f
a
m
i
l
y
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
C
o
d
e
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
.
Ado
p
t
an
o
rd
i
n
a
n
c
e
t
o
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
t
h
e
s
o
u
n
d
t
r
a
n
s
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
i
n
C
h
a
p
t
e
r
1
6
.
0
4
o
f
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
C
o
d
e
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
2
3
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
2
4
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
Pu
b
l
i
c
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
Th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
t
a
b
l
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
u
b
l
i
c
U
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
,
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
p
o
l
i
c
y
a
n
d
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
a
n
d
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
A
,
B
a
n
d
C
.
T
h
i
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
a
n
e
w
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
.
T
h
e
2
0
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
a
nd Concept
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
a
r
e
s
h
o
w
n
i
n
t
h
e
s
a
m
e
c
o
l
u
m
n
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
t
h
e
s
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
t
h
e
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
p
o
l
i
c
y
u
p
d
a
t
e
s
e
n
v
i
s
i
o
n
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
the
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
(
e
.
g
.
,
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
,
l
e
g
a
l
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y
/
e
d
i
t
o
r
i
a
l
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
)
.
20
0
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
/
Co
n
c
e
p
t
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
A
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
B
Co
n
c
e
p
t
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
C
Reason for Change(s)
GO
A
L
AJ
:
E
n
s
u
r
e
A
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
S
e
w
e
r
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
Po
l
i
c
y
7-
1
5
-
4
5
:
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
u
p
e
rt
i
n
o
S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
i
n
p
u
t
i
n
t
o
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
’
s
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
p
r
e
p
a
r
at
i
o
n
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
i
s
s
u
e
s
r
e
l
e
v
a
n
t
t
o
Cu
p
e
r
t
i
n
o
’
s
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
p
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
a
r
e
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
e
d
,
an
d
w
o
r
k
c
l
o
s
e
l
y
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
o
n
t
h
e
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
.
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
w
i
t
h
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
o
n
t
h
e
i
r
M
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
t
o
e
n
s
u
r
e
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
f
o
r
f
u
t
u
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
b
u
i
l
d
o
u
t
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
7-
2
5
-
4
6
:
S
u
n
n
y
v
a
l
e
T
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
t
Co
n
s
i
d
e
r
t
h
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
n
t
h
e
S
u
n
n
y
v
a
l
e
s
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
s
e
w
e
r
sy
s
t
e
m
i
f
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
o
f
f
i
c
e
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
in
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
S
t
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
r
e
a
.
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
No Changes
Po
l
i
c
y
7-
3
5
-
4
7
:
Va
l
l
c
o
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
S
e
w
e
r
T
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
y
L
i
n
e
s
Re
c
o
g
n
i
z
e
t
h
a
t
n
e
w
h
i
g
h
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
u
s
e
r
s
i
n
t
h
e
V
a
l
l
c
o
, ar
e
a
a
n
d
t
h
e
St
e
v
e
n
s
C
r
e
e
k
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
a
n
d
Bl
a
n
e
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
a
r
e
a
s w
i
l
l
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
s
t
o
p
a
y
f
o
r
t
h
e
u
p
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
o
f
t
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
y
l
i
n
e
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
Co
s
t
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
.
De
v
e
l
o
p
p
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
c
o
s
t
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
u
p
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
o
f
t
h
e
s
e
w
e
r
t
r
i
b
u
t
a
r
y
li
n
e
s
t
o
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
w
i
t
h
p
r
o
s
p
e
c
t
i
v
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
s
.
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Sa
m
e
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
Ap
p
l
y
Consistency/Editing
GO
A
L
B:
E
n
s
u
r
e
A
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
P
u
b
l
i
c
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
f
o
r
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
U
s
e
s
a
n
d
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
G
r
o
w
t
h
Po
l
i
c
y
7-
4
:
N
e
w
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
P
u
b
l
i
c
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
Re
q
u
i
r
e
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
pu
b
l
i
c
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
o
r
p
a
y
i
t
s
f
a
i
r
s
h
a
r
e
o
f
t
h
e
c
o
s
t
f
o
r
pu
b
l
i
c
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
o
a
cc
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
g
r
o
w
t
h
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
a
d
v
e
r
s
e
l
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
i
n
g
cu
r
r
e
n
t
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
l
e
v
e
l
s
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
1
.
D
e
s
i
g
n
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
.
En
s
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
p
u
b
l
i
c
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
a
r
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
e
d
a
n
d
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
e
d
t
o
m
e
e
t
u
l
t
i
m
a
t
e
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
n
e
e
d
s
t
o
av
o
i
d
t
h
e
n
e
e
d
f
o
r
f
u
t
u
r
e
u
p
s
i
z
i
n
g
.
F
o
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
su
b
j
e
c
t
t
o
i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
u
p
s
i
z
i
n
g
,
i
n
i
t
i
a
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
sh
a
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
l
a
n
d
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
a
n
y
o
t
h
e
r
el
e
m
e
n
t
s
n
o
t
e
a
s
i
l
y
e
x
p
a
n
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
.
I
n
f
r
a
s
tr
u
c
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
s
h
o
u
l
d
d
i
s
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
ov
e
r
-
s
i
z
i
n
g
o
f
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
w
h
i
c
h
c
o
u
l
d
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
e
t
o
g
r
o
w
t
h
b
e
y
o
n
d
w
h
a
t
w
a
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
2
.
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
U
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
.
Re
q
u
i
r
e
u
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
o
f
a
l
l
n
e
w
p
u
b
l
i
c
l
y
o
w
n
e
d
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
l
i
n
e
s
.
Ne
w
P
o
l
i
c
y
Ne
w
P
o
l
i
c
y
Community Input Consistency/Editing
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
A
m
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Public Draft
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
P
o
l
i
c
y
C
h
a
n
g
e
s
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
1
2
5
J
u
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
1
4
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
u
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
o
f
a
l
l
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
l
y
o
w
n
e
d
ut
i
l
i
t
y
l
i
n
e
s
i
n
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
.
W
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
el
e
c
t
r
i
c
i
t
y
a
n
d
t
e
l
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
t
o
u
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
o
v
e
r
h
e
a
d
l
i
n
e
s
.
Po
l
i
c
y
7-
5
: St
o
r
m
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
In
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
.
M
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
s
t
o
r
m
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
i
n
a
ma
n
n
e
r
t
h
a
t
r
e
d
u
c
e
s
f
l
o
o
d
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
.
A
s
t
h
e
s
t
o
r
m
d
r
ai
n
a
g
e
s
y
s
t
e
m
i
s
e
x
t
e
n
d
e
d
o
r
m
o
d
i
f
i
e
d
,
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
t
o
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
l
y
c
o
n
v
e
y
t
h
e
1
0
-
y
e
a
r
s
t
o
r
m
e
v
e
n
t
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
s
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
f
o
r
up
s
i
z
i
n
g
o
r
c
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
n
g
t
o
w
a
r
d
s
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
,
a
s
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
Ne
w
P
o
l
i
c
y
N
e
w
P
o
l
i
c
y
Community Input Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
7
-
6
:
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
a
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
b
a
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
ad
o
p
t
e
d
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
P
l
a
n
s
a
n
d
P
o
l
i
c
i
e
s
w
h
i
c
h
ar
e
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
.
Ne
w
P
o
l
i
c
y
N
e
w
P
o
l
i
c
y
Community Input Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
7
-
7
:
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
a
n
d
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
n
g
.
Fi
n
a
n
c
e
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
a
n
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
n
e
e
d
s
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
e
d
b
y
n
e
w
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
n
e
w
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
f
e
e
s
s
o
t
h
at
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
a
r
e
n
o
t
bu
r
d
e
n
e
d
b
y
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
t
a
x
e
s
o
r
b
y
l
o
w
e
r
e
d
s
e
r
v
ic
e
l
e
v
e
l
s
t
o
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
t
h
e
n
e
e
d
s
c
r
e
a
t
e
d
b
y
ne
w
g
r
o
w
t
h
.
St
r
a
t
e
g
y
.
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
s
.
C
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
t
h
e
a
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
a
n
d
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
I
m
p
a
c
t
F
e
e
f
o
r
n
e
w
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
Ne
w
P
o
l
i
c
y
N
e
w
P
o
l
i
c
y
Community Input Consistency/Editing
Po
l
i
c
y
7
-
8
:
P
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
M
u
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
a
n
d
I
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
.
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
i
z
e
f
u
n
d
n
g
o
f
C
i
t
y
mu
n
i
c
i
p
a
l
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
a
n
d
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
s
t
i
m
u
l
at
e
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
j
o
b
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
u
f
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
r
e
v
e
n
u
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
t
o
a
c
hi
e
v
e
a
n
d
m
a
i
n
t
a
i
n
f
i
s
c
a
l
s
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
.
Ne
w
P
o
l
i
c
y
N
e
w
P
o
l
i
c
y
Community Input Consistency/Editing
April 2010
6. 6B6BHousing Plan
This section outlines the City of Cupertino’s quantified objectives for new unit construction,
conservation, and rehabilitation during the 2007-2014 planning period. It then presents policies
and programs to meet these objectives and address local housing needs. The policies and programs
are grouped under the following major goals:
Goal A: An Adequate Supply of Residential Units for all Economic Segments
Goal B: Housing that is Affordable for a Diversity of Cupertino Households
Goal C: Enhanced Residential Neighborhoods
Goal D: Services for Special Needs Neighborhoods
Goal E: Equal Access to Housing Opportunities
Goal F: Coordination with Local School Districts
This section also identifies the responsible party and provides a timeline for each implementation
program.
6.1. 44B43BQuantified Objectives
The following table outlines the City’s proposed housing production, rehabilitation, and
conservation objectives for the current Housing Element planning period. These objectives
correspond with the City’s remaining 2007-2014 Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA)
from ABAG.
Table 7.1: Quantified Objectives
Income Category
Already
Approved
New
ConstructionRehabilitation (a)PreservationTotal
Very Low2231900341
Low1621300229
Moderate5818500243
Above Moderate437000357
Total533717001,170
Notes:
(a) The City has approved CDBG funds for a rehabilitation project that will provide transitional
housing for 16 very low- and low-income victims of domestic violence.
Sources: City of Cupertino, 2009; BAE, 2009
6.2. 45B44BGoal A: An Adequate Supply of Residential Units for All
April 2010
Economic Segments
126B125BPolicy 1: Sufficiently Residentially Zoned land for New Construction Need
Designate sufficient residentially-zoned land at appropriate densities to provide adequate sites that
will meet ABAG’s estimate of Cupertino’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) of 1,170
units for 2007-2014.
UProgram 1: Zoning and Land Use Designations.U In order to accommodate the City’s remaining
RHNA, one parcel of land will need a change in zoning. The City will change zoning to permit
residential development at a higher density than what is currently allowed.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: 2010
Funding Source: N/A
Quantified Objective: 798
Site to be rezoned:
APN: 326-10-046 (Site 13 in Appendix G)
Size: 7.98 acres
Current Density: 10 DUA
Density under Rezoning: 25 DUA
Residential Capacity following Rezoning: Up to 199 units
UProgram 2: Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance.U The City shall continue to implement the Second
Dwelling Unit Ordinance and encourage the production of more second units on residential parcels.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
Funding Source: N/A
Quantified Objective: 25 second units, 2009-2014
Program 3: Encourage Lot Consolidation. The City will continue to encourage lot consolidation
when smaller, underutilized parcels adjacent to each other are redeveloped. The City encourages
master plans for such sites with coordinated access and circulation and City staff will provide
technical assistance to property owners of adjacent parcels to facilitate coordinated redevelopment
where appropriate. Staff from all City Departments and related agencies work with applicants on a
preliminary basis for no cost prior to application submittal.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
Funding Source: N/A
April 2010
Quantified Objective: N/A
6.3. 46B45BGoal B: Housing is Affordable for a Diversity of Cupertino
Households
127B126BPolicy 2: Housing Mitigation Plan
The Housing Mitigation plan is based on a nexus study prepared by the City that demonstrated that
all new developments, including market-rate residential developments, create a need for affordable
housing.
UProgram 4: Housing Mitigation Plan – Office and Industrial Mitigation The City will
continue to implement the “Office and Industrial Mitigation” fee program. This program requires
that developers of office, commercial, and industrial space pay a fee, which will then be used to
support affordable housing for families who work in Cupertino but live elsewhere. These fees are
collected and deposited in the City’s Affordable Housing Fund.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
Funding Source: N/A
Quantified Objective: N/A
UProgram 5: Housing Mitigation Program – Residential Mitigation
The City will continue to implement the “Housing Mitigation” program to mitigate the need for
affordable housing created by new market-rate residential development. This program applies to
all new residential development of one unit or greater. Mitigation includes either the payment of
the “Housing Mitigation” fee or the provision of a Below Market Rate (BMR) unit or units.
Projects of seven or more for-sale units must provide on-site BMR units. Projects of six units or
fewer for-sale units can either build one BMR unit or pay the Housing Mitigation fee. Developers
of market-rate rental units, where the units cannot be sold individually, must pay the Housing
Mitigation fee to the Affordable Housing Trust Fund to be consistent with recent court decisions
and the State Costa-Hawkins Act regarding rent control. The City provides incentives for BMR
units as described in Program 12. Implementation of the program shall include:
a) Priority. Priority for occupancy to households who reside, work, attend school or have
family in Cupertino for BMR units produced through the plan or affordable housing units
built with mitigation fees;
b) Public Service. Additional priority for households with wage earners who provide
a public service; specifically, employees of the City, local school district and public safety
agencies;
April 2010
c) For-Sale Residential Developments. Require 15% for-sale BMR units in all residential
developments where the units can be sold individually (including single-family homes,
common interest developments, and condominium conversions).
d) Market-Rate Rental Developments. Require payment of the Housing Mitigation fee in
all market-rate rental development where the units cannot be sold individually.
e) Rental Alternative. Allow rental BMR units in for-sale residential developments, and
allow developers of market-rate rental developments to provide on-site rental BMR units,
if the developer: 1) enters into an agreement limiting rents in exchange for regulatory or
financial incentives; and 2) provides very low income and low income BMR rental units.
f) Affordable Prices and Rents. Establish guidelines for affordable sales prices and
affordable rents for new affordable housing and update the guidelines each year as new
income guidelines are received;
g) Land for Affordable Housing. Allow developers to meet all or a portion of their BMR or
mitigation fee requirement by making land available for the City or a nonprofit housing
developer to construct affordable housing;
h) BMR Term. Require BMR units to remain affordable for a minimum of 99 years; and
enforce the City’s first right of refusal for BMR units and other means to ensure that BMR
units remain affordable.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
Funding Source: N/A
Quantified Objective: N/A
UProgram 6: Affordable Housing Fund
The City’s Affordable Housing Fund provides financial assistance to affordable housing
developments. “Requests for Proposals” (RFPs) will be solicited from interested parties to develop
affordable units with housing funds. Affordable housing funds will be expended in the following
manner (ranked in order of priority):
a) Finance affordable housing projects in Cupertino.
b) Establish a down payment assistance plan that may be used in conjunction
with the BMR program or to make market rate units more affordable. The assistance
should be in the form of low interest loans and not grants.
c) Establish a rental subsidy program to make market rate units more affordable.
April 2010
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
Funding Source: Housing Mitigation Plan Fees
Quantified Objective: N/A
128B127BPolicy 3: Range of Housing Types
Encourage the development of diverse housing stock that provides a range of housing types
(including smaller, moderate cost housing) and affordable levels. Emphasize the provision of
housing for lower and moderate income households and, also, households with wage
earners who provide services (e.g., school district employees, municipal and public safety
employees, etc.)
UProgram 7: Mortgage Credit Certificate Program
Participate in the countywide Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) Program. This program allocates
mortgage credit certificates to first-time homebuyers to purchase housing. Due to the high cost of
housing units in Cupertino, it is estimated that most of the County’s MCC’ will be used
in the City of San Jose, where there are more low cost housing units available for sale.
Responsible Party: Santa Clara County Mortgage Credit Certificate Program
Time Frame: 2009-2014
Funding Source: Santa Clara County Mortgage Credit Certificate Program
Quantified Objective: 1-2 households assisted annually
UProgram 8: Move-In for Less Program
The Tri-County Apartment Association is managing this program, which recognizes
the high cost of securing rental housing. The program is geared to classroom teachers
in public or private schools who meet income criteria. Apartment owners/managers who
agree to participate in the program require no more than 20% of the monthly rent as a security
deposit from qualified teachers.
Responsible Party: Tri-County Apartment Association and City of Cupertino
Time Frame: 2009-2014
UProgram 9: Surplus Property for Housing
In conjunction with local public agencies, school districts and churches, the City will develop a list
of surplus property or underutilized property that have the potential for residential development,
compatible with surrounding densities. Additionally, long-term land leases of property from
churches, school districts corporations for construction of affordable units shall be encouraged.
Further, the feasibility of developing special housing for teachers or other employee groups on the
surplus properties will be evaluated. Teacher-assisted housing programs in neighboring districts,
such as Santa Clara United School district, will be reviewed for applicability in Cupertino.
April 2010
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: 2009-2014
UProgram 10: Jobs/Housing Balance Program
Require major new office/industrial development to build housing as part of new development
projects. As part of the development review process, the City will evaluate the impact of any
application that will produce additional jobs in the community. The purpose of the evaluation is to
describe the impacts of the new jobs on the City’s housing stock, especially in relation to the
jobs/housing ratio in the City.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: 2009-2014
129B128BPolicy 4: Housing Rehabilitation
Pursue and/or provide funding for the construction or rehabilitation of housing that is affordable to
very low, low and moderate-income households. Actively support and assist non-profit
and for profit developers in producing affordable units.
UProgram 11: Affordable Housing Information and Support.
The City will provide information, resources and support to developers who can produce affordable
housing. Information will be updated on a regular basis in regard to available funding sources and
be distributed to all interested developers. In addition, information regarding additional City
incentives such as the Density Bonus Program (see Program 12) will also be provided and updated
on a regular basis. Further, the City will involve the public from the beginning of an affordable
housing application so that there are fewer objections to the project as it goes though the City
approval process
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: 2009-2014
130B129BPolicy 5: Development of Affordable Housing
Maintain and/or adopt appropriate land use regulations and other development tools to encourage
the development of affordable housing. Make every reasonable effort to disperse units throughout
the community but not at the expense of undermining the fundamental goal of providing affordable
units.
U
April 2010
Program 12: Density Bonus Program.
The City’s Density Bonus Program allows for a density bonus and additional concessions for
development of 6 or more units that provide affordable housing for families and seniors. Possible
concessions include reduced parking standards, reduced open space requirements, reduced setback
requirements, and approval of mixed use zoning. The City will change the Ordinance definition of
affordable unit to housing costs affordable at 30% of household income for very low and low
income households.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
UProgram 13: Regulatory Incentives for Affordable Housing
The City may choose to waive park dedication and construction tax fees for affordable units. For
affordable, mixed-use and higher density residential developments, the Planning Commission or
City Council may approve deviations from the Parking Regulation Ordinance of the Cupertino
Municipal Code, if the applicant can provide a study supporting the deviation. Further, the City
will continue to efficiently process all development applications.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: 2009-2014
U Program 14: Extremely Low-Income Housing. The City will encourage the development of
adequate housing to meet the needs of extremely low-income households by providing assistance
and funding for affordable housing developments. Assistance can include gap financing for single-
room occupancy projects, affordable rental housing, senior housing, and other housing
developments and programs targeting extremely low-income households.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
Funding Source: CDBG and HOME funds
Quantified Objective: N/A
Program 15: Residential and Mixed Use Opportunities in or Near Employment Centers
The City will encourage mixed use development and the use of shared parking facilities in or near
employment centers. In addition to the development opportunities available through the “Heart of
the City” Specific Plan, the City will evaluate the possibility of allowing residential development
above existing parking areas except where mixed use is herein excluded. In specific, these
areas would be near or adjacent to employment centers and could provide additional opportunities
for housing.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: 2009-2014
April 2010
Program 16: Expedited Permit Procedures
The City will expedite permit processing for housing developments that contain at least 20 percent
of units for lower-income households, or 10 percent of units for very low-income households, or 50
percent of units for senior citizens.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
131B130BPolicy 6: Tax-Increment Funds
Continue to use a minimum of 25% of tax increment funds generated from the Redevelopment
Project Area for housing activities that create affordable housing for lower and moderate income
households. Set aside 5% of the 25% for extremely low income housing.
UProgram 17: Redevelopment Housing Set Aside Fund
The City has established a Redevelopment Project Area, from which tax increment funds are
collected. A minimum of 25% of tax increment funds will be directed to low and moderate-income
households, 5% of which are directed to extremely-low income households. The Redevelopment
Agency will develop policies and objectives for the use of those funds. All policies and objectives
shall be developed to reflect the goals and objectives of the Housing Element. The Low- and
Moderate-Income Housing Fund will be utilized for site acquisition, rehabilitation, and
development gap financing for affordable housing projects. Currently the City has a limited
amount of funds in the Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Fund. However, when substantial
redevelopment in the RDA commences, availability of funds will increase.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
Funding Source: Redevelopment tax Increment Funds
Quantified Objective: $518,000 over the planning period
132B131BPolicy 7: Housing Densities
Provide a full range of ownership and rental housing unit densities, including apartments and other
high-density housing.
UProgram 18: Flexible Residential Standards
Allow flexible residential development standards in planned residential zoning districts,
such as smaller lot sizes, lot widths, floor area ratios and setbacks, particularly for higher density
and attached housing developments.
April 2010
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
UProgram 19: Residential Development Exceeding Maximums
Allow residential developments to exceed planned density maximums if they provide special needs
housing and the increase in density will not overburden neighborhood streets or hurt neighborhood
character.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
Program 20: Monitor R-3 Development Standards
The City will monitor the R-3 development standards on a regular basis to ensure that the
requirements do not constrain new housing production. As part of this Program, the City will
review recent development applications in the R-3 District and assess the achieved project density
relative to the maximum density allowed. If R-3 District development standards are found to
unreasonably constrain development, the City will consider amendments to the standards.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Every two years
Program 21: Clarify Language of Planned Development (P) District
The City will amend the zoning ordinance to clarify that residential development in P (Res/R3)
zones will require a planned development permit and not a conditional use permit as residential
developments are permitted uses.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: 2010
6.4. 47B46BGoal C: Enhanced Residential Neighborhoods
133B132BPolicy 8: Maintenance and Repair
Assist very low and low-income homeowners and rental property owners in maintaining and
repairing their housing units.
UProgram 22: Apartment Acquisition and Rehabilitation
This program provides financial assistance to eligible very low and low-income homeowners to
rehabilitate their housing units.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino
Time Frame: Ongoing
April 2010
Funding Source: Affordable Housing Fund and CDBG funds
Quantified Objective: 3-5 Units Annually
134B133BPolicy 9: Conservation of Housing Stock
Conserve the existing stock of owner and rental housing units, which provide affordable housing
opportunities for lower and moderate income households.
Program 23: Preservation of “At Risk Units”
The lone project with affordability restrictions which will expire within the 10 year period
following adoption of this element is the Le Beaulieu project with affordability restrictions expiring
in September 2015. Cupertino Community Housing originally developed Le Beaulieu in 1984 and
utilized project based Section 8 vouchers. Although not within the current Housing Element
planning period, the City will monitor owners of at-risk projects on an ongoing basis to determine
their interest in selling, prepaying, terminating or continuing participation in a subsidy program.
The City will also work with owners, tenants, and nonprofit organizations to assist in the nonprofit
acquisition of at-risk projects to ensure long-term affordability of developments where appropriate.
Assistance may include support in funding applications or the provision of rehabilitation grants.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: 2009-2014
UProgram 24: Condominium Conversions.
The City’s existing Condominium Conversion Ordinance regulates the conversion of rental units in
multi-family housing development in order to preserve the rental housing stock. Condominium
conversions are not allowed if the rental vacancy rate in Cupertino is less than 5% at the time of the
application for conversion and has averaged 5% over the past six months.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
UProgram 25: Rental Housing Preservation Program
The City’s existing multi-family rental units provide housing opportunities for households of
varied income levels. The City will develop and adopt a program that includes the following
guidelines:
When a proposed development or redevelopment of a site would cause a loss of
multi-family rental housing, the City will grant approval only if at least two of the following
three circumstances exist:
The project will comply with the City’s BMR Program based on the actual number of new
units constructed, not the net number of units, and/or
April 2010
The number of rental units to be provided on the site is at least equal to the number of
existing rental units, and/or
No less than 20% of the units will comply with the City’s BMR Program. Further, the
preservation program will include a requirement for a tenant relocation plan with
provisions for relocation of tenants on site as much as possible.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
UProgram 26: Conservation and Maintenance of Affordable Housing.
Develop a program to encourage the maintenance and rehabilitation of residential structures to
preserve the older, more affordable housing stock.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: 2009-2014
UProgram 27: Neighborhood and Community Clean Up Campaigns
Continue to encourage and sponsor neighborhood and community clean up campaigns for both
public and private properties.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
135B134BPolicy 10: Energy Conservation
Encourage energy conservation in all existing and new residential development.
UProgram 28: Energy Conservation Opportunities
The City will continue to enforce Title 24 requirements for energy conservation and will evaluate
utilizing some of the other suggestions as identified in the Environmental Resources/Sustainability
element.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: 2009-2014
UProgram 29: Fee Waivers or Reduction for Energy Conservation
The City will evaluate and implement the potential to provide incentives, such as waiving or
reducing fees, for energy conservation improvements to residential units (existing or new).
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
April 2010
Program 30: Energy Efficiency Audits. The City will offer free energy efficiency audits for
residential units under a contract with Acterra. During the house call, trained volunteers will visit
the residence, performing simple energy-saving upgrades and showing residents how to reduce
their energy usage. Residents receive three free compact fluorescent light bulbs, an installed
retractable clothesline (if desired), adjustments to the water heater and refrigerator temperatures,
installed low-flow showerhead and faucet aerators, a folder of local green resources a customized
energy-saving plan for their home.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
Funding Source: Department of Energy ARRA Grant
Quantified Objective: N/A
Program 31: Energy Conservation in Residential Development. The City will continue to
encourage energy efficient residential development and provide technical assistance to developers
who are interested in incorporating energy efficient design elements into their program. The City
has a Sustainability Coordinator who encourages energy conservation and assists developers.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
Funding Source: Department of Energy ARRA Grant
Quantified Objective: N/A
6.5. 48B47BGoal D: Services for Special Needs Households
136B135BPolicy 11: Special Needs Households
Support organizations that provide services to special need households in the City, such as the
homeless, elderly, disabled and single parent households.
UProgram 32: Emergency Shelters.U
The City will continue to support the rotating emergency shelter operated by West Valley
Community Services. In order to comply with SB 2 and to facilitate any future emergency shelter
needs, the City will revise the Zoning Ordinance to allow permanent emergency shelter facilities in
“BQ” Quasi-Public zoning districts as a permitted use. The zoning ordinance will include
development and management standards that will subject permanent emergency shelters to the
same standards that apply to other permitted uses in the BQ zone. No discretionary permits will be
required for approval of a permanent emergency shelter.
Responsible Party: Cupertino City Council
April 2010
Time Frame: 2009-2010. Revise Zoning Ordinance to allow permanent emergency
shelters in BQ zoning districts.
Funding Source: N/A
Quantified Objective: N/A
U
Program 33: Rotating Homeless Shelter
Responsible Party: West Valley Community Services
Time Frame: Ongoing
Funding Source: CDBG and McKinney Act Funding
Quantified Objective: N/A
Program 34: Transitional and Supportive Housing
The City will amend its zoning ordinance to comply with the requirements of SB2. Transitional
and supportive housing will be treated as residential uses and be subject to the same development
standards and restrictions that apply to similar housing types in the same zone. Per the Health and
Safety Code 50801(e), transitional housing will be defined as rental housing operated under
program requirements that call for the termination of assistance and recirculation of the assisted
unit to another eligible program recipient at some predetermined future point in time, which shall
be no less than six months. Supportive housing will be defined as housing with no limit on length
of stay that is occupied by the target population and that is linked to onsite or offsite services that
assist the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing, improving his or her health status,
and maximizing his or her ability to live, and where possible, work in the community.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: 2009-20010 Revise Zoning Ordinance to define transitional and
supportive housing and list them as permitted uses in residential zones.
Funding Source: N/A
Quantified Objective: N/A
Program 35: Catholic Social Services (Single Parents)
Catholic Social Services provides help to place single parents in shared housing situations.
The program in funded with Santa Clara County Urban County funds.
Responsible Party: Catholic Social Services
Time Frame: Ongoing
Funding Source: County of Santa Clara Urban County Funds
Program 36: Flexible Parking Standards
The City may grant reductions in off-street parking on a case-by-case basis for senior housing,
April 2010
group homes, affordable housing, transit-oriented developments, and other appropriate projects.
Applicants must demonstrate that project characteristics justify a reduction and that the reduction
would not generate a parking deficiency or adversely impact neighboring properties. City staff will
work with applicants to provide justification for parking reductions. Appropriate justification for
parking reductions may include examples of parking ratios used at other similar projects, parking
studies prepared for the project, parking studies prepared for other similar project in Cupertino,
shared parking arrangements, or the implementation of transportation management measures.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Director of Community Development, Design
Review Committee, and Planning Commission
Time Frame: Ongoing
6.6. 49B48BGoal E: Equal Access to Housing Opportunities
137B136BPolicy 12: Housing Discrimination
The City will work to eliminate on a citywide basis all unlawful discrimination in housing with
respect to age, race, sex, sexual orientation, marital or familial status, ethnic background, medical
condition, or other arbitrary factors, so that all persons can obtain decent housing.
UProgram 37: Santa Clara County Fair Housing Consortium
The Santa Clara County Fair Housing Consortium includes the Asian Law Alliance, Mid-Peninsula
Citizens for Fair Housing, Project Sentinel and the Mental Health Advocates Program. These
organizations provide resources for Cupertino residents with tenant/landlord rental mediation,
housing discrimination and fair housing concerns. The Santa Clara County Fair Housing
Consortium, which includes the Asian Law Alliance (ALA), ECHO Housing, Project Sentinel, and
the Mental Health Advocacy Project will continue to provide resources for Santa Clara County
residents with tenant/landlord, housing discrimination, and fair housing concerns. According to an
agreement between members of the consortium, each agency serves a “territory” in the county.
Cupertino falls in ECHO Housing’s territory and is served under an agreement between the City
and the agency. They provide fair housing counseling services, answer questions and investigate
cases of fair housing abuse. ECHO provides pamphlets in all public facilities throughout the City
and also has a booth at public events to distribute materials. Furthermore, the agency runs public
service announcements on local radio stations throughout the year.
Responsible Party: Santa Clara County Fair Housing Consortium
Time Frame: Ongoing
Funding Source: County of Santa Clara Urban County Funds
Program 38: Fair Housing Outreach
April 2010
The City will continue to contract with ECHO Housing to provide fair housing outreach services.
ECHO distributes pamphlets at community events and pays for public service announcements. In
addition, the ECHO Housing will continue to distribute fair housing materials at public venues
throughout Cupertino, including the library, City Hall, and Senior Center.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department, ECHO
Fair Housing
Time Frame: Ongoing
Funding Source: CDBG
Program 39: Reasonable Accommodation Ordinance
The City will adopt a written reasonable accommodation ordinance to provide persons with
disabilities exceptions in zoning and land-use for housing. The procedure will be an administrative
process, with minimal or no processing fee and subject to approval by the Community
Development Director. Applications for reasonable accommodation may be submitted by
individuals with a disability protected under fair housing laws. The requested accommodation
must be necessary to make housing available to a person with a disability and must not impose
undue financial or administrative burden on the City.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department
Time Frame: Adopt Ordinance by December 2010
6.7. 50B49BGoal F: Coordination with Local School Districts
138B137BPolicy 13: Coordination with Local School Districts
The Cupertino community places a high value on the excellent quality of education provided by the
two public school districts which serve the city. In order to ensure the long-term sustainability of
the schools in tandem with the preservation and development of vibrant residential areas, the City
will institute a new policy of coordinating closely with the Cupertino Union School District
(CUSD) and Fremont Union High School District (FUHSD)
UProgram 40: Coordination with Local School Districts
Form a new committee of key staff from the City and the school districts to meet on a bi-monthly
basis or as needed to review City planning initiatives, development proposals and School capital
facilities and operating plans. Prepare annual reports with key recommendations from this
committee to the School District Boards and the City Planning Commission and City Council.
Responsible Party: City of Cupertino, Community Development Department Staff and
April 2010
Staff from CUSD and FUHSD
Time Frame: 2009-2014