Loading...
ERC 01-08-2015 Community Development Department Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 APPROVED MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE HELD ON JANUARY 8,2015 Committee Members: David Brandt Timm Borden Aarti Shrivastava Paul Brophy Barry Chang Committee Members absent: none Staff present: Erin Cooke APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 23,2014 The minutes of October 23,2014 were approved as written ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Reserved for persons wishing to address the Committee on issues that are not already included in the regular Order of Business) Speaker, Bill Oman, addressed the Committee regarding air quality in the Valley. He expressed concern about the particulate matter (smog) in the air caused by the operations of the Lehigh Cement plant. He wanted to bring it the Committee's attention that the facility plans on increasing its production. Speaker, Gary Latshaw, addressed the Committee about the email documentation he sent to the Committee (documentation was provided to members as Written Communications at today's meeting). These emails pertain to the emissions and pollutants generated by the Lehigh Cement plant. He wanted to bring it to the Committee's attention that the Bay Area Air Quality Management District's Board has allowed the plan to increase production without requiring the submittal of a new Health Risk Assessment Report. He requested that the City write a letter to the District's Board requesting that new emissions controls be mandated for the cement plant. Note-The Lehigh Cement Plant is not located within the City of Cupertino city limits NEW ITEMS: 1. Application No.(s) Climate Action Plan(EA-2013-02) Applicant: City of Cupertino Location: citywide Review Climate Action Plan (CAP) process and proposed greenhouse gas reduction measures; focusing on options to reduce community-wide and municipal emissions across the energy, transportation, water and solid waste sectors. ❑ Discussion A Climate Action Plan will enhance the City's existing programs and policies (Green Building Ordinance, Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, Green Business Program, Composting Program, street light and facility upgrades). A practical reason to consider adoption of a Climate Action Plan, which serves as a qualified greenhouse gas emissions reductions plan under the Bay Air Quality Management District's CEQA Guidelines, is to help developers within the City streamline their project-level CEQA review. Any .project that demonstrates alignment with the CAP requirements can 'fast track' the greenhouse gas emissions analysis required under CEQA. Additionally, the City's General Plan Sustainability Element requires the City to adopt a Climate Action Plan. The Climate Action: • Analyzes projected population and employment growth numbers and develop mitigation measures to reduce green house gas emissions for those projected growth estimates. • Offers opportunities to create and expand partnerships for environmental programs with other agencies like VTA,MTC and ABAG. These agencies require the adoption of a Climate Action Plan in order to qualify for grant funds to use for program development. o Details the following elements; establish a baseline measurement of greenhouse gas emissions, project and forecast future emissions, create reduction targets/goals, strategies and methods to reach those targets,establish timelines and monitoring programs. • Reviews state-level emissions reductions efforts and requirements. The State of California set target reduction rates at 15% reduction (of baseline measured emissions) by 2020, 50% by 2035 and 80%by 2050.Most cities have also set these same standards. o Considers emissions reduction targets for the City: The City of Cupertino will set its target reduction rate by comparing the 'Business as Usual' projections (only population and employment growth figures) against the 'Adjusted Business as Usual' projections (population and employment growth figures adjusted for the implementation of statewide policies to reduce emissions. o Resources specific goals set with the City's proposed Climate Action Plan (CAP) including; the reduction of energy use, encouragement of the use of alternate methods of transportation, conservation of potable water, reduction of solid waste and the expansion of green infrastructure. o Outlines mitigation measures and data collection that will have the most impact in the areas of energy use and transportation. In order to better reach the proposed targeted goals, the City will have to implement reduction plans in these areas. o Clarifies which reduction actions are already in progress. The City has already implemented a solid waste/paper diversion program, a demolition and construction waste diversion program, street-light retrofits and an urban forest program. Future programs proposed through the CAP include a recycled water/irrigation program, a zero waste goal and the maintenance and updates of the Climate Action Plan. The environmental impacts of approval of the Climate Action Plan have been studied. It was determined that there are no new or additional significant impacts that were not already analyzed and had mitigations prescribed for in the Environmental Impact Report prepared as part of the General Plan Amendments. The mitigation measures that were evaluated were: o The installation of solar and photovoltaic system on City facilities o The installation of electric charging stations o Evaluating fuel cell fueling stations o Developing a citywide bike share program or opting to participate in the SF Bay Area's regional program o Transit priority issues;transit traffic signal timing,intersection transit queue jumps o Community-wide alternate fuel vehicles ACTION: Recommendation for approval of an Amendment to the Environmental Impact Report for EA-2013-03 (GPA-2013-01, GPA-2013-02, Z-2013-01,SPA-2014-01,MCA-2014-01) MOTION:David Brandt SECOND: Aarti Shrivastava NOES: none VOTE: 5-0-0 OLD BUSINESS None Respectfully submitted, 01 Beth Ebben Administrative Clerk