Loading...
ERC Packet 08-01-2019CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA 10300 Torre Avenue, City Hall Conference Room C Thursday, August 1, 2019 9:30 AM ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1.Subject: Draft Minutes of July 18, 2019 Recommended Action: approve or modify the Draft Minutes of July 18, 2019 Draft Minutes of July 18, 2019 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the members on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the members from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS STUDY SESSION 2.Subject: presentation of common CEQA documents and terms Recommended Action: receive presentation and provide any input to Staff PUBLIC HEARINGS 3.Subject: Development and Use Permits to allow the construction of a 155 room hotel, Architectural and Site approval for a 155 room hotel, Development Agreement and General Plan Amendment for hotel allocation, height and setbacks. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is proposed. Application No(s).: ASA-2018-02, DA-2018-01, DP-2018-01, GPA-2018-01, U-2018-02 (EA-2018-03); Applicant(s): Sherly Kwok (De Anza Properties); Location: 10931 N De Anza Blvd. APN#326-10-061 Recommended Action: Conduct the public hearing to determine; 1) That the proposed mitigations are not in conflict with the City's General Plan; 2) Recommend to the City Council the approval of the Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 1 Environmental Review Committee Agenda August 1, 2019 Draft Initial Study Appendix A - AirQuality Appendix B - Health Risk Assessment Appendix C - Noise Data Appendix D - Transportation Impact Analysis Appendix E - Phase I & Phase II ESAs NEW BUSINESS STAFF AND COMMITTEE REPORTS ADJOURNMENT In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend the next meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for assistance. Upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative format. Also upon request, in advance, an assistive listening device can be made available for use during the meeting. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the members after publication of the agenda will be made available for public inspection. Please contact the City Clerk’s Office in City Hall located at 10300 Torre Avenue during normal business hours. IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code 2.08.100 written communications sent to the Cupertino City Council, Commissioners or City staff concerning a matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These written communications are accessible to the public through the City’s website and kept in packet archives. You are hereby admonished not to include any personal or private information in written communications to the City that you do not wish to make public; doing so shall constitute a waiver of any privacy rights you may have on the information provided to the City . Members of the public are entitled to address the members concerning any item that is described in the notice or agenda for this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address the members on any other item not on the agenda, you may do so during the public comment . Page 2 Community Development Department Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 ACTION MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE HELD ON July 18, 2019 Committee Members:Kitty Moore, Chair Chad Mosley, Vice Chair Deborah Feng Ben Fu Darcy Paul Rhoda Fry, Member at Large Committee Members absent:None Staff present:None Consultant Presenters:None APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 1. June 20, 2019 The minutes of the June 20, 2019 were approved as written ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Reserved for persons wishing to address the Committee on issues that are not already included in the regular Order of Business) None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: Member Fry handed out a letter from Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District regarding the Lehigh Cement Plant. She also distributed a press release announcing that the City of San Jose earned a LEED Platinum certification and one announcing that the City of Berkeley has banned natural gas in new buildings. PUBLIC HEARING:None OLD BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS 2. Subject: receive “A Practical Guide to the California Environmental 6 th Edition” by Placeworks Recommended Action: receive booklet and provide any input to Staff The booklets were handed out by Member Fu. Chair Moore provided some background information on what she felt this booklet would be a good start towards the education the Committee members in the CEQA process. Additional Discussion o The Committee discussed the how California’s Building Code nearly meets all of requirements for a building to qualify for LEED certification o The City Attorney is reviewing Staff’s proposed language changes to the City’s Municipal Code, Section 2.84. After their review, this item will be agendized for the Committee o The public environmental scoping meeting for the Westport re-development project is this evening o Thoughts regarding hiring a Staff Member who is very knowledgeable in the CEQA requirements o Topics for education for the Committee o The Committee agreed that Staff Reports should be revised to clarify/detail the environmental review and mitigations that occur on development sites o The Committee discussed proposing changes to the City’s Municipal Code to require that new construction meet LEED Tier 2 requirements STAFF AND COMMITTEE REPORTS Committee Member Paul suggested that the Environmental Review Committee web page be updated with the names and contact information of the Committee members. ADJOURNMENT Respectfully submitted, /s/Beth Ebben Beth Ebben Deputy Board Clerk Scale Date DrawnWinkleman Designs 1795 Amaya Ridge Road Soquel, CA 95073 408.353.6700 bill@winklemandesigns.comC:\Users\Bill\Documents\DAH-CEN18_GPA_6 Story_v5_bill@winklemandesigns.com.rvt11/12/2018 3:35:41 PMA11.01SE View De Anza Properties The De Anza 11/13/18 Author 10931 N De Anza Blvd, Cupertino, CA The De Anza Hotel Project for the City of Cupertino July 2, 2019 | Public Review Draft Initial Study Image Credit: Winkleman Designs, November 13, 2018. Prepared By: PlaceWorks 1625 Shattuck Avenue, Suite 300 Berkeley, California 94709 510.848.3815 ORANGE COUNTY • BAY AREA • SACRAMENTO • CENTRAL COAST • LOS ANGELES • INLAND EMPIRE • SAN DIEGO www.placeworks.com The De Anza Hotel Project for the City of Cupertino July 2, 2019 Public Review Draft Initial Study PLACEWORKS i PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Initial Study............................................................................................................................ 1-2 1.2 Tiering Process ...................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Report Organization ........................................................................................................... 1-5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Initial Study Checklist .......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected .................................................................. 2-2 2.3 Determination ...................................................................................................................... 2-2 2.4 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures ............................................................ 2-3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Project Location and Site Characteristics ...................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Project Components ........................................................................................................3-13 3.3 Required Permits and Approvals ...................................................................................3-26 3.4 Voluntary Community Amenities ...................................................................................3-26 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................ 4-1 4.1 Discussion of Environmental Evaluation .......................................................................... 4-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM .......................................................... 5-1 ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED ............................................................................. 6-1 APPENDICES Appendix A: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data Appendix B: Health Risk Assessment Appendix C: Noise Data Appendix D: Transportation Impact Analysis Appendix E: Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments SOURCES In addition to the technical appendices, all documents cited in this report and used in its preparation are hereby incorporated by reference into this Initial Study. Copies of documents referenced herein are available for review at the City of Cupertino Community Development Department at 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO TABLE OF CONTENTS ii JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3-1 Regional and Vicinity Map ............................................................................................... 3-2 Figure 3-2 Aerial View of Project Site and Surroundings................................................................. 3-3 Figure 3-3 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................................. 3-5 Figure 3-4 Conceptual Site Plan .......................................................................................................3-15 Figure 3-5 First Floor Plan .....................................................................................................................3-16 Figure 3-6 Second Floor Plan .............................................................................................................3-17 Figure 3-7 Third Floor Plan ...................................................................................................................3-18 Figure 3-8 Roof Plan .............................................................................................................................3-19 Figure 3-9 West and East Elevations .................................................................................................3-20 Figure 3-10 North and South Elevations .............................................................................................3-21 THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO TABLE OF CONTENTS PLACEWORKS iii PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 Scope of the Proposed Project in the General Plan EIR and the Proposed Project ................................................................................................................................... 1-3 Table 3-1 Demolition and Construction Phasing ..........................................................................3-25 Table 4-1 Existing Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions ............................................................................. 4-8 Table 4-2 Construction-Related Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions Estimates ...............................4-12 Table 4-3 Operational Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions Estimates ...............................................4-13 Table 4-4 Construction Risk Summary – Unmitigated ..................................................................4-14 Table 4-5 Construction Risk Summary – Mitigated .......................................................................4-16 Table 4-6 Project GHG Emissions ......................................................................................................4-38 Table 4-7 Project-Related Construction Noise, Energy-Average (Leq) Sound Levels, dBA ......................................................................................................................................4-60 Table 4-8 Construction Equipment Vibration Levels ....................................................................4-64 Table 4-9 Architectural Damage Vibration Levels from Construction Equipment ................4-65 Table 4-10 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions Based on Control Delay ........4-74 Table 4-11 Existing without Project Intersection Level of Service .................................................4-75 Table 4-12 Existing Transit Service ......................................................................................................4-77 Table 4-13 Background without Project Intersection Level of Service Results ..........................4-79 Table 4-14 Project Trip Generation Estimates ..................................................................................4-80 Table 4-15 Existing plus Project Intersection Level of Service Results ..........................................4-81 Table 4-16 Background plus Project Intersection Level of Service Results ................................4-82 Table 4-17 Reasonably Foreseeable Development Projects in Cupertino ............................ 4-101 Table 5-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ............................................................. 5-2 THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO TABLE OF CONTENTS iv JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT This page intentionally left blank. PLACEWORKS 1-1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Introduction This document is an Initial Study for the De Anza Hotel Project (proposed project) prepared by the City of Cupertino (City) to determine whether the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment. This Initial Study was prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code sections 21000 et seq.) and CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations sections 15000 et seq.). Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15051, the City is the lead agency for the proposed project. The project site is located on a 1.29-acre site at 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, approximately mid-way between Homestead Road to the north of the site and Interstate 280 (I-280) to the south of the site. The project site is currently developed with commercial land uses associated with the Goodyear Auto Service Center (Goodyear Tire). The proposed project would involve demolishing the existing commercial building and constructing a hotel with up to 156 rooms 1 with associated amenities including a conference/meeting room and a restaurant. The project proposes both at-grade and below-grade parking spaces, and associated landscaping. The project site is assigned Accessor Parcel Number (APN) 326-10-061. The site’s General Plan land use designation is Commercial/Residential and the Zoning District is General Commercial (CG) with special development regulations (rg), together referred to as CG-rg.2 In September 2015, the City adopted “General Plan Amendment Procedures” that allow project applicants to apply for authorization to process a General Plan Amendment. Each application undergoes a preliminary review to determine if the proposed project achieves the goals of the General Plan, amongst other criteria. The City Council, at a publicly noticed meeting, authorizes the applications that satisfy the required criteria to proceed with the General Plan amendment application.3 A General Plan Amendment Authorization resolution was adopted by City Council that allowed the project applicant to make an application for a General Plan Amendment to increase the hotel development allocation up to 156 rooms, increase the allowable building height, and reduce the building plane setback requirements in the Homestead Special Area and North De Anza Gateway.4 Accordingly, the project that is the subject of this 1 Note this Initial Study is based on a hotel project with up to 156 rooms; however, the final project may have slightly fewer rooms. 2 City of Cupertino Ordinance 436 (not codified). 3 Procedures for Processing of General Plan Amendment Applications as listed in City of Cupertino Resolution Number 15- 078, Passed and Adopted at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino on September 1, 2015. 4 City of Cupertino General Plan Amendment Authorization Number 2018-01, Resolution Number 19-010, Passed and Adopted at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino on January 15, 2019. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO INTRODUCTION 1-2 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Initial Study includes an evaluation of these proposed amendments to the General Plan. For further details on the project description, see Chapter 3 of this Initial Study. 1.1 INITIAL STUDY Pursuant to Section 15063 of the CEQA Guidelines,5 an Initial Study is a preliminary environmental analysis that is used by the lead agency as a basis for determining what form of environmental review is required for a project. The CEQA Guidelines require that an Initial Study contain a project description, description of environmental setting, identification of environmental effects by checklist or other similar form, explanation of environmental effects, discussion of mitigation for significant environmental effects, evaluation of the project’s consistency with existing and applicable land use controls, and the name of persons who prepared the study. 1.2 TIERING PROCESS The CEQA concept of "tiering" refers to the evaluation of general environmental matters in a broader program-level EIR, with subsequent focused or project-level environmental documents for individual projects that implement the program. This Initial Study incorporates by reference the discussions in the City’s General Plan Amendment, Housing Element Update, and associated Rezoning Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was certified by the Cupertino City Council in December 2014,6 and the addendum to that EIR that was approved by the City Council in October 2015,7 together hereinafter “General Plan EIR.” The analysis in this Initial Study concentrates on the project-specific issues pertaining to the proposed De Anza Hotel project. CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines encourage the use of tiered environmental documents to reduce delays and excessive paperwork in the environmental review process. This is accomplished in tiered documents by eliminating repetitive analyses of issues that were adequately addressed in the program EIRs and by incorporating those analyses by reference. In order to determine whether the proposed project was part of the development that was examined in the General Plan EIR, the following questions must be answered:  Is the proposed project included in the scope of the development projected and analyzed in the General Plan EIR? 5 The CEQA Guidelines are found in California Code of Regulations, Title, 14, Section 15000 et seq. 6 City of Cupertino, certified General Plan Amendment, Housing Element Update, and Associated Rezoning EIR, State Clearinghouse Number 2014032007. December 2014. 7 City of Cupertino, approved General Plan Amendment, Housing Element Update, and Associated Rezoning EIR Final Addendum, State Clearinghouse Number 2014032007. October 2015. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO INTRODUCTION PLACEWORKS 1-3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT  Is the project site in an area that was considered for hotel land uses in the General Plan EIR?  Are the changes to population and employment associated with the proposed project included within the scope of the projections accounted for in the General Plan EIR?  Is the proposed project within the scope of the cumulative analysis in the General Plan EIR? Table 1-1 shows a comparison of the scope of the proposed project compared to the scope of the evaluation included in the General Plan EIR. As shown in Table 1-1, the proposed project is well within the scope of hotel development and building height limits analyzed in the General Plan EIR for the project site. TABLE 1-1 SCOPE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT IN THE GENERAL PLAN EIR AND THE PROPOSED PROJECT General Plan EIR Proposed Project Project Site Study Area 1 (Cupertino Inn and Goodyear Tire) At the site of Goodyear Tire General Plan Land Use Commercial/Residential Commercial/Residential Zoning Planned Development General Commercial (P(CG))a General Commercial with special development regulation (CG-rg) Proposed Project 250 hotel rooms with conference facility 156 hotel rooms with conference facilities Maximum Height 145 feetb 82 feet and 8 inches at the top of bar roof Employeesc 75c 78d Notes: a. The General Plan EIR evaluated a proposed change to the current zoning on the project site, which is General Commercial with special development regulation (CG-rg); however, the zoning designation was not changed. b. The General Plan EIR included a description of multiple height scenarios for the project site. These included 60 feet, 75 feet with retail, and 145 feet with retail and community benefits. In the Aesthetics chapter of the General Plan EIR, the project site was evaluated at the maximum height. c. The General Plan EIR applied 0.3 employees per hotel room (0.3 x 250 = 75 employees). d. The City now assumes one job (employee) for every two hotel rooms (156 rooms/2 employees = 78 employees). Source: PlaceWorks, Project Applicant, City of Cupertino, certified General Plan Amendment, Housing Element Update, and Associated Rezoning EIR and Addendum, State Clearinghouse Number 2014032007. December 2014 and October 2015. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Commercial/Residential, which allows primarily commercial uses and secondarily residential uses or a compatible combination of the two. Hotel uses are permitted in the Commercial/Residential land use designation. The site is located in the North De Anza Gateway, which is within the Homestead Special Area.8 The Homestead Special Area includes residential, commercial, office and hotel uses along Homestead Road, between I-280 and the Sunnyvale city limit. The General Plan EIR evaluated designated gateways, which represent key locations in the city that, with the use of design elements such as buildings, arches, fountains, banners, signage, special lighting, landscaping and public art, have the opportunity to create a memorable impression of Cupertino. Development in the city’s gateways is required to have high-quality 8 City of Cupertino General Plan, Community Vision 2040, Chapter 3, Land Use, Figure LU-1, Community Form Diagram, page LU-18. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO INTRODUCTION 1-4 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT buildings with architecture and materials to reflect the entrances to the city. The General Plan EIR considered future development in the gateways that foster sustainable development practices including, but not limited to, locating high-density residential and employment growth near major transportation and transit corridors, concentrating development on infill sites, and promoting multi-modal (e.g., bike, pedestrian, transit) transportation opportunities. The proposed project is a hotel with conference facilities and a ground-floor restaurant and rooftop terrace, lounge and bar, which is consistent with the types of development envisioned in the North De Anza Gateway. The General Plan EIR evaluated a Zoning designation change to Planned Development General Commercial (P(CG)) to be consistent with the Cupertino Hotel that is adjacent to the project site. However, the site was not rezoned and the current Zoning designation for General Commercial with special development regulation CG-rg applies to the site. The General Plan EIR evaluated the potential for new development that would bring approximately 12,998new residents 9 and 16,855 new jobs10 to the city within the 2040 plan horizon. These new residents and jobs, combined with existing conditions, would result in 71,300 residents and 44,242 jobs at the General Plan 2040 buildout horizon. The proposed project is anticipated to be completed by 2022. As discussed in the General Plan EIR, according to the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), Cupertino is projected to have 62,500 residents and 30,110 jobs by 2020 and 66,800 residents and 31,370 jobs by 2030. No new residents are projected due to the proposed project. Temporary construction- related jobs and 78 permanent jobs are projected to be created by the 2022 buildout year. The City has approved one new 122-room hotel as part of the Marina Plaza project since the certification of the General Plan EIR. The City currently has an open application for the proposed 185-room Cupertino Village Hotel project. Combined, these projects equal 307 hotel rooms. Therefore, the proposed project, combined with the other hotels that are being considered, would not increase hotel development to levels that would exceed the 1,339 new hotel rooms analyzed in the General Plan EIR. Accordingly, the project’s proposed increase of temporary construction-related jobs and permanent jobs associated with hotel projects, in combination with other hotel projects, would not increase development projections related to hotel projects over the year 2020 or 2030 projections. Therefore, the project is within the population and employment projections considered in the General Plan EIR. Accordingly, this Initial Study tiers from the General Plan EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15152 (Public Resources Code Section 21094). 9 Population is calculated by 4,421 units times 2.94 persons per household, which is the ABAG 2040 estimated generation rate. 10 Jobs are calculated applying the City’s generation rates as follows; 4,040,231 square feet of office allocation divided by 300 square feet equals 13,467 jobs; 1,343,679 square feet of commercial allocation divided by 450 square feet equals 2,986 jobs; and 1,339 hotel rooms at .3 jobs per room equals 402 jobs for a total of 16,855 jobs. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO INTRODUCTION PLACEWORKS 1-5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 1.3 REPORT ORGANIZATION This Initial Study is organized into the following chapters: Chapter 1: Introduction. This chapter provides an introduction and overview of the Initial Study document. Chapter 2: Executive Summary. A summary of the pertinent details for the proposed project, including lead agency contact information, proposed project location, and General Plan and Zoning designations are in this chapter. This chapter also summarizes the significant impacts that could occur from construction and operation of the proposed project and identifies the mitigation measures recommended to reduce the impact to a less-than-significant level. Chapter 3: Project Description. This chapter describes the location and setting of the proposed project, along with its principal components, as well as a description of the policy setting and implementation process for the proposed project . Chapter 4: Environmental Analysis. Making use of the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, Environmental Checklist, that was updated in December 2018, this chapter identifies and discusses anticipated impacts from the proposed project, providing substantiation of the findings made. Chapter 5: Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. This chapter lists the impacts found to be significant and identifies the recommended mitigation measures categorized by impact area. Chapter 6: Organizations and Persons Consulted. This chapter presents a list of City, other agencies, and consultant team members that contributed to the preparation of the Initial Study. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO INTRODUCTION 1-6 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT This page intentionally left blank. PLACEWORKS 2-1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Executive Summary 2.1 INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST 1. Project Title: The De Anza Hotel Project 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Gian Martire, Associate Planner GianM@cupertino.org 408-777-3319 4. Project Location: 10931 North De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA 95014 5. Project Applicant’s Name and Address: De Anza Properties 960 North San Antonio Road Los Altos, CA 94703 6. General Plan Land Use Designation: Commercial/Residential 7. Zoning: General Commercial with special development regulation (CG-rg) 8. Description of Project: See Project Description in Chapter 3 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: See page 1 of Chapter 3, Project Description 10. Other Public Agencies whose Approval is Required: See page 26 of Chapter 3, Project Description 11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.? The City has not received any request from any Tribes in the geographic area with which they are traditionally and culturally affiliated or otherwise to be notified about projects in Cupertino. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PLACEWORKS 2-3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 2.4 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Due to the location of the project site, the proposed project would have no impact on Agriculture, Forestry or Mineral Resources; thus, these topics are not discussed in detail in the Initial Study. The following lists the significant impacts by topic that could occur from construction and operation of the proposed project and identifies mitigation measures to reduce the impacts to a less-than-significant level. All other topic areas were identified to have less than significant impacts. A detailed discussion of the project’s impacts is provided in Chapter 4, Environmental Analysis, of this Initial Study. AIR QUALITY Impact AQ-1: Fugitive dust (PM10 and PM2.5) generated by the proposed project during construction could potentially result in significant regional short-term air quality impacts without implementation of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s best management practices related to reducing fugitive dust emissions. Mitigation Measure AQ-1: The project’s construction contractor shall comply with the following best management practices for reducing construction emissions of fugitive dust (PM10 and PM2.5) as required by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District Revised California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines:  Water all active construction areas at least twice daily, or as often as needed to control dust emissions. Watering should be sufficient to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency may be necessary whenever wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour. Reclaimed water should be used whenever possible.  Pave, apply water twice daily or as often as necessary to control dust, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites.  Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard (i.e., the minimum required space between the top of the load and the top of the trailer).  Sweep daily (with water sweepers using reclaimed water if possible) or as often as needed all paved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at the construction site to control dust.  Sweep public streets daily (with water sweepers using reclaimed water if possible) in the vicinity of the project site, or as often as needed, to keep streets free of visible soil material.  Hydroseed or apply non-toxic soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas.  Enclose, cover, water twice daily, or apply non-toxic soil binders to exposed stockpiles (dirt/sand).  Limit vehicle traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour.  Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as possible.  Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff from public roadways. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2-4 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Impact AQ-2: The proposed project could expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations during construction. Mitigation Measure AQ-2: During construction, the construction contractor(s) shall:  Use construction equipment fitted with Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) for all equipment of 50 horsepower or more.  Prior to issuance of any construction permit, ensure that all construction plans submitted to the City of Cupertino Planning Department and/or Building Division clearly show the requirement for Level 3 DPF emissions standards for construction equipment over 50 horsepower.  Maintain a list of all operating equipment in use on the project site for verification by the City of Cupertino Building Division official or his/her designee. The construction equipment list shall state the makes, models, and number of construction equipment on-site.  Ensure that all equipment shall be properly serviced and maintained in accordance with manufacturer recommendations.  Communicate with all sub-contractors in contracts and construction documents that all nonessential idling of construction equipment is restricted to 5 minutes or less in compliance with California Air Resources Board Rule 2449 and is responsible for ensuring that this requirement is met. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Impact BIO-1: The proposed project could have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on a plant or animal population, or essential habitat, defined as a candidate, sensitive or special-status species. Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Nests of raptors and other birds shall be protected when in active use, as required by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the California Fish and Game Code. If construction activities and any required tree removal are proposed to occur during the breeding season (February 1 and August 31), the construction contractor shall indicate, on all construction plans, that preconstruction surveys shall:  Be conducted by a qualified biologist prior to tree removal or grading, demolition, or construction activities. Note that preconstruction surveys are not required for tree removal or construction, grading, or demolition activities outside the nesting period.  Be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the start of tree removal or construction.  Be repeated at 14-day intervals until construction has been initiated in the area after which surveys can be stopped.  Document locations of active nests containing viable eggs or young birds. Protective measures for active nests containing viable eggs or young birds shall be implemented under the direction of the qualified biologist until the nests no longer contain eggs or young birds. Protective measures shall include:  Establishment of clearly delineated exclusion zones (i.e., demarcated by identifiable fencing, such as orange construction fencing or equivalent) around each nest location as determined by the THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PLACEWORKS 2-5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT qualified biologist, taking into account the species of birds nesting, their tolerance for disturbance and proximity to existing development. In general, exclusion zones shall be a minimum of 300 feet for raptors and 75 feet for passerines and other birds.  Monitoring active nests within an exclusion zone on a weekly basis throughout the nesting season to identify signs of disturbance and confirm nesting status.  An increase in the radius of an exclusion zone by the qualified biologist if project activities are determined to be adversely affecting the nesting birds. Exclusion zones may be reduced by the qualified biologist only in consultation with California Department of Fish and Wildlife.  The protection measures shall remain in effect until the young have left the nest and are foraging independently or the nest is no longer active. CULTURAL RESOURCES Impact CULT-1: The proposed project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. Mitigation Measure CULT-1: If any prehistoric or historic subsurface cultural resources are discovered during ground-disturbing (including grading, demolition and/or construction) activities:  All work within 50 feet of the resources shall be halted, the City shall be notified and a qualified archaeologist shall be consulted. The contractor shall cooperate in the recovery of the materials. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for tribal cultural resources, historical resources or unique archaeological resources is being carried out.  The qualified archaeologist shall prepare a report for the evaluation of the resource to the California Register of Historical Places and the City Building Department. The report shall also include appropriate recommendations regarding the significance of the find and appropriate mitigations as follows: • If the resource is a non-tribal resource, the archaeologist shall assess the significance of the find according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. • If the resource is a tribal resource – whether historic or prehistoric – the consulting archaeologist shall consult with the appropriate tribe(s) to evaluate the significance of the resource and to recommend appropriate and feasible avoidance, testing, preservation or mitigation measures, in light of factors such as the significance of the find, proposed project design, costs, and other considerations. If avoidance is infeasible, other appropriate measures (e.g., data recovery) may be implemented.  All significant non-tribal cultural materials recovered shall be, as necessary, and at the discretion of the consulting archaeologist, subject to scientific analysis, professional museum curation, and documentation according to current professional standards. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2-6 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT GEOLOGY AND SOILS Impact GEO-1: The proposed project could directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. Mitigation Measure GEO-1: The construction contractor shall incorporate the following in all grading, demolition, and construction plans:  In the event that fossils or fossil-bearing deposits are discovered during grading, demolition, or building, excavations within 50 feet of the find shall be temporarily halted or diverted.  The contractor shall notify the City of Cupertino Building Department and a City-approved qualified paleontologist to examine the discovery.  The paleontologist shall document the discovery as needed, in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards (Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 1995), evaluate the potential resource, and assess the significance of the finding under the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5.  The paleontologist shall notify the appropriate agencies to determine procedures that would be followed before construction is allowed to resume at the location of the find.  If the project applicant determines that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall prepare an excavation plan for mitigating the effect of the project based on the qualities that make the resource important. The excavation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to implementation. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Impact GHG-1: The proposed project would generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. Mitigation Measure GHG-1: The project applicant shall offset a minimum of 173 metric tons metric tons of carbon dioxide-equivalent (MTCO2e) emissions per year for a period of 30 years (5,190 MTCO2e) through the purchase of voluntary carbon offsets (i.e., not compliance offsets) from the California Air Resources Board (CARB) approved Offset Project Registries (i.e., Climate Action Reserve, Verra , American Carbon Registry) or forecasted mitigation units (FMUs) (GHG Mitigation Credits) from the Climate Action Reserve’s Climate Forward program. The voluntary carbon offsets or FMUs must be real, additional, permanent, confirmable, and enforceable. The order of preference for purchase of voluntary carbon offsets or FMUs shall be as follows: 1) within the City; 2) within the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin; 3) within the State of California; then 4) elsewhere in the United States. Evidence of payments, and funding of an escrow-type account or endowment fund shall be submitted to the City by the project applicant. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, the project applicant shall submit to the City of Cupertino Building Division official or his/her designee, the necessary documentation to verify the agreement to purchase the necessary voluntary carbon offsets or FMUs to offset project emissions to below 1,100 MTCO2e per year. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PLACEWORKS 2-7 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT NOISE Impact NOISE-1: The proposed project could result in the generation of a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project during the construction phase that would be in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or in other applicable local, State, or federal standards. Mitigation Measure NOISE-1: The following shall be incorporated in all demolition, grading, and construction plans, as required by the Cupertino Municipal Code (CMC). Construction activities shall take place only during daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, and 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekends. In addition, the construction crew shall adhere to the following best management practices shall be observed:  At least 90 days prior to the start of any construction, demolition or grading activities, all offsite businesses and residents within 300 feet of the project site will be notified of the planned activities. The notification will include a brief description of the project, the activities that would occur, the hours when activity would occur, and the construction period’s overall duration. The notification should include the telephone numbers of the contractor’s authorized representatives that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint.  The project applicant and contractors shall prepare and submit a Construction Noise Control Plan to the City’s Building Department and Code Enforcement for review and approval prior to issuance of any grading, demolition, and/or building permits. The Construction Noise Plan shall demonstrate compliance with the 80 dBA limit in the CMC. The details of the Construction Noise Control Plan, including those details listed herein, shall be included as part of the permit application drawing set and as part of the construction drawing set, shall be implemented by the on-site Construction Manager, and shall include, but not be limited to, the following available controls to comply with the 80 dBA performance standard: • At least 10 days prior to the start of construction activities, a sign will be posted at the entrance(s) to the job site, clearly visible to the public, which includes permitted construction days and hours, as well as the telephone numbers of the City’s and contractor’s authorized representatives that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint. If the authorized contractor’s representative receives a complaint, he/she will investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action to the City. • During the entire active construction period, equipment and trucks used for project construction will utilize the best available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment re- design, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds), wherever feasible. • Include noise control requirements for equipment and tools, including concrete saws, to the maximum extent feasible. Such requirements could include, but are not limited to, erecting temporary plywood noise barriers between areas where concrete saws will be used and nearby sensitive receptors; performing work in a manner that minimizes noise; and undertaking the noisiest activities during times of least disturbance to nearby sensitive receptors. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2-8 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT • During the entire active construction period, stationary noise sources will be located as far from sensitive receptors as possible, and they will be muffled and enclosed within temporary sheds, or insulation barriers or other measures will be incorporated to the extent feasible. • During the entire active construction period, noisy operations will be conducted simultaneously to the degree feasible in order to reduce the time periods of these operations. • Select haul routes that avoid th e greatest amount of sensitive use areas and submit to the City of Cupertino Public Works Department for approval prior to the start of the construction phase. • Signs will be posted at the job site entrance(s), within the on-site construction zones, and along queueing lanes (if any) to reinforce the prohibition of unnecessary engine idling. All other equipment will be turned off if not in use for more than 5 minutes. • During the entire active construction period and to the extent feasible, the use of noise producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells will be for safety warning purposes only. The construction manager will use smart back-up alarms, which automatically adjust the alarm level based on the background noise level, or switch off back-up alarms and replace with human spotters in compliance with all safety requirements and laws. Impact NOISE-2: The proposed project could result in the generation of a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project during the operation phase that would be in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or in other applicable local, State, or federal standards. Mitigation Measure NOISE-2: Mechanical equipment shall be selected and designed to reduce impacts on surrounding uses to meet the Cupertino Municipal Code noise limits of 60 dBA and 50 dBA at residential uses during daytime and nighttime, respectively, and 65 dBA and 55 dBA at non-residential sensitive uses (i.e., the Cupertino Hotel) during daytime and nighttime, respectively. A qualified acoustical consultant shall be retained to review mechanical noise as these systems are selected to determine specific noise reduction measures necessary to reduce noise to comply with the City’s noise level requirements. Mechanical equipment shall be selected and designed to reduce impacts on surrounding uses to meet the City’s noise level requirements. Noise reduction measures could include, but are not limited to:  Selection of equipment that emits low noise levels;  Installation of noise dampening techniques, such as enclosures and parapet walls, to block the line-of- sight between the noise source and the nearest receptors;  Locating equipment in less noise-sensitive areas, where feasible. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Impact TRC-1: The proposed project could cause a substantial adverse impact to an unknown Tribal Cultural Resource. Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Implement Mitigation Measure CULT-1. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PLACEWORKS 2-9 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Impact UTIL-1: The proposed project may result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project does not have adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments. Mitigation Measure UTIL-1: No building permits shall be issued by the City for the proposed De Anza Hotel Project that would result in exceeding the permitted peak wet weather flow capacity of 13.8 mgd through the Santa Clara sanitary sewer system. The project applicant may demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City of Cupertino and Cupertino Sanitary District (CSD), that the proposed hotel would not exceed the peak wet weather flow capacity of the Santa Clara sanitary sewer system by implementing one or more of the following methods: 1) Reduce inflow and infiltration in the CSD system to reduce peak wet weather flows; or 2) Increase on-site water reuse, such as increased grey water use, or reduce water consumption of the fixtures used within the proposed project, or other methods that are measurable and reduce sewer generation rates to acceptable levels, to the satisfaction of the CSD. 3) The proposed project’s estimated wastewater generation shall be calculated using the generation rates used by the San Jose-Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant Specific Use Code & Sewer Coefficient table in the May 2007, City of Santa Clara Sanitary Sewer Capacity Assessment,11 and California Green Building Standards, unless alternative (i.e., lower) generation rates achieved by the proposed project are substantiated by the project applicant based on evidence to the satisfaction of the CSD. 11 Mark Thomas and Associates. Email communication with Cupertino Public Works. July 19, 2018. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2-10 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT This page intentionally left blank. PLACEWORKS 3-1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Project Description The applicant, De Anza Properties, is proposing the De Anza Hotel Project (proposed project) which would involve the construction of a hotel on a 1.29-acre site. The project site is currently developed with commercial land uses (Goodyear Tire). The proposed project would involve demolishing the existing commercial building and redeveloping the site with a new seven-story hotel with up to 156 rooms, a rooftop terrace, lounge, and bar and ground-floor conference facilities and restaurant. The proposed project would include four levels of below-grade parking. This chapter provides a detailed description of the proposed project, including the location, setting, and characteristics of the project site, the principal project features, construction phasing and schedule, as well as a list of the required permits and approvals. 3.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS 3.1.1 REGIONAL LOCATION As shown on Figure 3-1, the project site is located in Cupertino, which is in the northwestern portion of Santa Clara County. Cupertino is roughly 45 miles south of San Francisco and 10 miles west of downtown San Jose. Interstate 280 (I-280) provides regional access to the project site. 3.1.2 LOCAL SETTING The project site is located at 10931 North De Anza Boulevard. The site is located on the eastern side of the Homestead Square Shopping Center (Homestead Square), which offers retail and restaurants for nearby workers and serves as a village center for the residential uses in this area. As shown on Figure 3-2, the project site is bounded by Homestead Square buildings and parking lots to the north and west, North De Anza Boulevard to the east, and Cupertino Hotel to the south. The Cupertino Hotel is a full service, boutique, business hotel with event facilities and 125 rooms. The project is separated from the Homestead Square Shopping Center to the west by an approximately 20-foot (two-lanes) wide internal roadway, from the Commercial/Retail building to the north by an approximately 40-foot (three-lanes) wide driveway, from the Aviare Apartments to the east by North De Anza Boulevard, which is approximately 150 feet (six-lanes) wide including the landscaped median, and from Cupertino Hotel building to the south by an approximately 34-foot (two-lane) wide driveway.12 12 The existing driveways off North De Anza Boulevard meet three-car width standard required by the CG-rg Zoning code. Figure 3-1 Regional and Vicinity Map Source: ESRI, 2017; PlaceWorks, 2019. 0 0.15 0.30.075 Miles P San Francisco Bay %&'(280 %&'(880 %&'(680 San Jose Hayward Cupertino (/101 Milpitas Palo Alto |ÿ17 (/101 Santa Cruz Gilroy PROJECT SITE %&'(280 City of Sunnyvale City of Cupertino Project Site Cupertino City Limit Stevens Creek BlvdNorth De Anza BlvdSunnyvale Saratoga RdNorth Stelling RdHomestead Rd Homestead Rd PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PLACEWORKS Source: Google Earth Professional, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2018. Figure 3-2 Aerial View of Project Site and Surroundings 0 Scale (Feet) 700 Junipero Serra Freeway Cupertino Hotel Aviare Apartments Villa Camino Apartments Homestead Square Shopping Center Public Storage E. Homestead Road N. De Anza BoulevardApple, Inc. Project Site PLACEWORKS PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3-4 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT The nearest residential development to the project site is the Aviare Apartments approximately 150 feet to the east of the project across North De Anza Boulevard. The closest neighborhood park is Franco Park approximately 0.5 miles to the west. The Nimitz and Louis E. Stocklmier Elementary Schools are located about 1 mile to the north, the Homestead High School and Cupertino Middle School are located approximately 0.75 miles and 1.5 miles to the west respectively, and the Saint Joseph Cupertino School and William Faria Elementary School are located approximately 0.8 miles and 1.6 miles to the south respectively. The closest major regional employer (Apple Park) is located about 0.25 miles to the south. The nearest public airports are San Jose International Airport, approximately 6 miles to the northeast, and Palo Alto Airport, approximately 9.3 miles to the northwest. The nearest heliports are McCandless Towers Heliport, approximately 4.5 miles to the northeast, and County Medical Center Heliport, approximately 5.6 miles to the southeast. 3.1.3 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS SITE CHARACTER As shown on Figure 3-3, the site is currently developed with an 8,323 square-foot building that is one story (approximately 18 feet) tall. The existing building is currently occupied with a Goodyear Tire, which provides new tires, tire repairs, oil changes, and other automotive care services and provides about 10 jobs.13 The site also contains surface parking. The site supported agricultural land uses between 1939 to 1968 and there is a potential that agricultural chemicals, such as pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers, were used on site. The existing building was built in 1971 and 1972. Due to the age of the existing buildings, they may contain asbestos-containing materials or lead-based paint, which have been regulated in construction since the early 1970’s.14 The project site was developed in 1971, which is within the 45-year age limit established by the State Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) for buildings that may be of historical value.15 13 Personal communication between PlaceWorks and Goodyear Auto Service Center on January 9, 2019. 14 AEI Consultants, 2018, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California. August 8, 2018. 15 Public Resources Code Section 5024.1 0 Scale (Feet) 200Source: Google Earth Professional, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2018. Figure 3-3 Existing Condition Project Site Junipero Serra Freeway N. De Anza BoulevardE. Homestead Road Aviare Apartments Cupertino Hotel Ultra BeautySafeway Rite Aid Star One Credit Union PLACEWORKS PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3-6 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT VEGETATION AND LANDCOVER Using data from the Classification and Assessment with Landsat of Visible Ecological Groupings (CALVEG)16 habitat mapping program, the site is classified as an “urban area” that tends to have low to poor wildlife habitat value due to replacement of natural communities, fragmentation of remaining open space areas and parks, and intensive human disturbance. According to the Vegetation Map shown in the Environmental Resources and Sustainability Element of the General Plan most of the City, including the project site, is within the urban forest.17 The City recognizes that every tree on both public and private property is an important part of Cupertino's urban forest and contributes significant economic, environmental and aesthetic benefits of the community.18 The site contains ornamental landscaping for the existing and surrounding commercial spaces, including 11 trees, of which six are located along North De Anza Boulevard. The California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) has no record of special-status plant or animal species on the project site or urbanized areas within a 1-mile area surrounding the project site. There are no natural lands within a 1-mile area of the project site. The California Department of Forestry and Fire Projection (CAL FIRE) has designated the project site as a Local Responsibility Area (LRA) and a non-very high fire hazard severity zone (NVHFHSZ). The project site is not near lands that CAL FIRE designates as State Responsibility Area (SRA). The nearest Fire Hazard Severity Zones in a designated SRA and LRA is a VHFHSZ about 5 miles south where the Fremont Older Open Space Preserve interfaces with the urban edge.19 Land between the edge of the FHSZ and the project site is dense urban development. The site is generally flat with an average elevation of 213 feet above mean sea level and the depth of groundwater is estimated to be 125 feet below ground surface or deeper. The soil is Urban Land Flaskan Complex, which is a well-drained sandy loam, sandy clay loam, gravelly sandy clay loam and very gravelly sandy clay loam soil with a depth of 59 inches.20 Surficial geology is young, unconsolidated Quaternary 16 The CALVEG system was initiated in January 1978 by the Region 5 Ecology Group of the US Forest Service to classify California’s existing vegetation communities for use in Statewide resource planning. CALVEG maps use a hierarchical classification on the following categories: forest; woodland; chaparral; shrubs; and herbaceous. 17 City of Cupertino General Plan (Community Vision 2015-2040), Chapter 6, Environmental Resources and Sustainability Element, Figure ES-1. 18 City of Cupertino, Tree Protection and Tree Removal link on the City’s website, Accessed May 6, 2019 at https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/community-development/planning/residential-development/tree-protection- tree-removal. 19 California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention (CAL FIRE). The Fire and Resource Assessment Program (FRAP). Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) in SRA and LRA. FHSZ Viewer. http://www.fire.ca.gov/fire_prevention/fire_prevention_wildland_zones_maps 20 AEI Consultants, 2018, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California. August 8, 2018. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PROJECT DESCRIPTION PLACEWORKS 3-7 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT alluvium,21 which is described as Holocene-age younger alluvium and coarse-grained alluvium that are composed of unconsolidated, poorly sorted gravel, silt, sand, and clay and organic matter. The existing impervious surface totals 38,380 square feet. Stormwater from the site would drain to a network of City-maintained storm drains that collect runoff from city streets and carries it to the creeks that run through Cupertino and to the San Francisco Bay. The current on-site utilities are a natural gas heating system and electric cooling system.22 The surrounding uses are the one-story (approximately 30 feet) buildings in the Homestead Square shopping center to the north and west, the three-story (approximately 45 feet) Aviare Apartments to the east, and the four-story (approximately 45 feet) Cupertino Hotel to the south. PUBLIC SERVICE AND UTILITY PROVIDERS The following service providers would serve the proposed project:  The City contracts with the Santa Clara County Fire District (SCCFD) for fire protection, emergency, medical, and hazardous materials services.  The City contracts with the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office (Sheriff’s Office) and West Valley Patrol Division for police protection services.  The site is in the Cupertino Union School District.  The Santa Clara County Library District governs and administers seven community libraries, one branch library, two bookmobiles, the Home Service Library, and the 24/7 online library. The closest library to the project site is the Cupertino Library located at 10800 Torre Avenue in Cupertino.  The City of Cupertino Recreation and Community Services is responsible for the maintenance of the City’s 14 parks and seven community and recreational facilities within the city boundary.  The project site is located within the California Water Service (Cal Water) Los Altos Suburban District (LASD) service area, and Cal Water would supply water for the project.  The project site is located within the Cupertino Sanitary District (CSD) service area and wastewater would be treated at the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant (SJ/SCWPCP). 21 US Geological Survey, 1994, Preliminary Quaternary Geologic Maps of Santa Clara Valley, Santa Clara, Alameda, and San Mateo Counties, California: A Digital Database, Open-File Report 94-231, by E.J. Helley, R.W. Graymer, G.A. Phelps, P.K. Showalter, and C.M. Wentworth. 22 AEI Consultants, 2018, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California. August 8, 2018. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3-8 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT  The City has contracts with Recology South Bay (Recology) and Newby Island Sanitary Landfill (NISL). Recology would provide curbside recycling, garbage, and compost and yard waste services to the project site and haul waste to the NISL.23  Electricity and natural gas would be supplied to the project site via infrastructure maintained by Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E).  Telephone service would be provided by AT&T and other providers. Cable television service would be available from a number of providers, including Comcast. 3.1.4 LAND USE DESIGNATION AND ZONING GENERAL PLAN The project site is assigned APN 326-10-061. In addition to the General Plan land use designation, the project site is located in a special planning area and designated gateway within the city. A description of the planning area and development parameters is provided below. Planning Area and Gateway The site is located in the North De Anza Gateway, which is within the Homestead Special Area.24 The Homestead Special Area includes residential, commercial, office and hotel uses along Homestead Road, between I-280 and the Sunnyvale city limit. In addition to the project site, the North De Anza Gateway includes one other hotel (Cupertino Hotel). According to the General Plan, the Homestead Special Area will continue to be a predominantly mixed-use retail commercial area with residential uses and neighborhood centers providing services to local residents. Bike and pedestrian improvements to the roadways in this area will provide better connections for residents and workers to access services. Tree- lined streets and sidewalks will provide an inviting environment and will link existing and new uses. Building Height As shown on the Community Form Diagram in the General Plan, a maximum height of 45 feet is allowed at this location.25 The adopted General Plan Amendment Authorization resolution allows the project 23 City of Cupertino, Garbage and Recycling Services Fact Sheet, http://www.recyclestuff.org/Guides/CityGuideCupertino.pdf, accessed May 7, 2019. 24 City of Cupertino General Plan, Community Vision 2040, Chapter 3, Land Use, Figure LU-1, Community Form Diagram, page LU-18. 25 City of Cupertino General Plan, Community Vision 2040, Chapter 3, Land Use, Figure LU-1, Community Form Diagram1, page LU-18. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PROJECT DESCRIPTION PLACEWORKS 3-9 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT applicant to apply for a General Plan Amendment to increase the height.26 The project features for the General Plan Amendment are discussed below in Section 3.2, Project Components. Land Use Designation The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Commercial/Residential, which allows primarily commercial uses and secondarily residential uses or a compatible combination of the two. Commercial use is defined in the General Plan as retail sales, businesses, limited professional offices, and service establishments with direct contact with customers. Commercial uses can range from neighborhood convenience to regionally oriented specialty stores. Retail stores that would be a nuisance to adjoining neighborhoods or harmful to the community identity would be regulated by the Commercial Zoning Ordinance and use permit procedures.27 ZONING DISTRICT The project site is within the General Commercial (CG) with special development regulations (rg), together referred to as CG-rg.28 As described in Cupertino Municipal Code (CMC) Section 19.60.010, the CG zoning district is intended to provide a means of guiding land development or redevelopment of the city to establish retailing, offices, and service establishments that ensure the maximum compatibility with surrounding residential areas. Development in this Zoning District provides goods and services to the general public, while minimizing adverse traffic impacts resulting from commercial development.29 The special development regulation applies to three parcels in the city. Ordinance 436 requires a driveway equal to the width of three cars (e.g., three 10-foot travel lanes would equal a 30-foot driveway) to serve the project site and Homestead Shopping Center.30 Hotel uses are allowed in the CG-rg Zoning District with a Conditional Use Permit issued by the Planning Commission pursuant to CMC Section 19.60.030.31 However, the adopted General Plan Amendment Authorization resolution allows the project applicant to apply for a General Plan Amendment to increase the hotel development allocation on the site;32 therefore, the project must be reviewed and approved by the City Council. The project features for the General Plan Amendment are discussed below in Section 3.2, Project Components. 26 City of Cupertino General Plan Amendment Authorization Number 2018-01, Resolution Number 19-010, Passed and Adopted at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino on January 15, 2019. 27 City of Cupertino General Plan, Community Vision 2040, Appendix A, Land Use Definitions, pages A-5 and A-6. 28 City of Cupertino Ordinance 436 (not codified). 29 The City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 19, Zoning, Chapter 19.60, General Commercial, Section 19.60.010, Purpose. 30 City of Cupertino Ordinance 436 (not codified). 31 The City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 19, Zoning, Chapter 19.60, General Commercial, Section 19.60.030, Permitted, Conditional, and Excluded Uses. Table 19.60.030: Permitted, Conditional and Excluded Uses in General Commercial Zoning Districts. 32 City of Cupertino General Plan Amendment Authorization Number 2018-01, Resolution Number 19-010, Passed and Adopted at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino on January 15, 2019. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3-10 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT SETBACKS Development on the site would be required to provide sufficient space for adequate light, air and visibility at intersections, and general conformity to yard requirements of adjacent or nearby zones, lot or parcels. However, pursuant to CMC Section 19.60.060, because the project site does not abut any residential or agricultural zones, no specific front, side, or rear yard setbacks are required.33 Nonetheless, the development on the project site must still adhere to the General Plan requirement of maintaining the building plane setback requirements whereas the primary bulk of the building is behind a 1:1 slope line (i.e., 1 foot of setback for every 1 foot of building height) from the face of the curb along North De Anza Boulevard.34 The adopted General Plan Amendment Authorization resolution allows the project applicant to apply for a General Plan Amendment to reduce the building plane setback requirements in the Homestead Special Area and North De Anza Gateway.35 The project features for the General Plan Amendment are discussed below in Section 3.2, Project Components. PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT AREA Plan Bay Area 2040 is the Bay Area’s current Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)/Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) that was adopted jointly by the Association of Bay Area Government’s (ABAG) and Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) on July 26, 2017. As part of the implementing framework for Plan Bay Area, local governments identified Priority Development Areas (PDAs) to focus growth. PDAs are transit-oriented, infill development opportunity areas within existing communities. An overarching goal of the regional Plan Bay Area 2040 is to concentrate development in areas where there are existing services and infrastructure rather than allocate new growth in outlying areas where substantial transportation investments would be necessary to maximize energy conservation and achieve the per capita passenger vehicle, vehicle miles traveled (also referred to as “VMT”), and associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions. The project site is located in the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority City Cores, Corridors & Station Areas PDA. While the project is in close proximity to existing employment centers, roadways, transit, and bicycle and pedestrian routes, it is not a designated Transit Priority Area (TPA).36 See Section 4.1, Discussion of Environmental Evaluation, for more discussion on TPAs. 33 The City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 19, Zoning, Chapter 19.60, General Commercial, Section 19.60.060, Development Standards. Table 19.60.060: Development Standards. 34 City of Cupertino General Plan, Community Vision 2040, Chapter 3, Land Use, Figure LU-1, Community Form Diagram, page LU-18. 35 City of Cupertino General Plan Amendment Authorization Number 2018-01, Resolution Number 19-010, Passed and Adopted at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino on January 15, 2019. 36 Plan Bay Area, Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG)/Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Priority Development Area (PDA) and Transit Priority Area (TPA) Map for CEQA Streamlining, https://www.planbayarea.org/pda-tpa-map, accessed on January 4, 2019. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PROJECT DESCRIPTION PLACEWORKS 3-11 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 3.1.5 OTHER REQUIREMENTS LANDSCAPING Landscape Ordinance CMC Chapter 14.15, Landscape Ordinance, implements the California Water Conservation in Landscaping Act of 2006 by establishing new water-efficient landscaping and irrigation requirements. In general, any building or landscape project that involves more than 2,500 square feet of landscape area is required to submit a Landscape Project Submittal to the Director of Community Development for approval. Existing and established landscaped areas over 1 acre, including cemeteries, are required to submit water budget calculations and audits of established landscapes.37 Tree Ordinances CMC Chapter 14.12, Trees, establishes regulations for the planting, care, and maintenance of public trees, and provides for the continuous maintenance of the public trees, with the goal of encouraging preservation of trees. The City funds the planting and maintenance of public trees through payment of reimbursement costs as a conditions of building permit issuance.38 CMC Chapter 14.18, Protected Tree Ordinance, provides regulations for the protection, preservation, and maintenance of trees of certain species and sizes. Removal of a protected tree requires a permit from the City. “Protected” trees include trees of a certain species and size in all zoning districts; heritage trees in all zoning districts; any tree required to be planted or retained as part of an approved development application, building permit, tree removal permit, or code enforcement action in all zoning districts; and approved privacy protection planting in single-family residential (R-1) zoning districts. Because the existing development is on property that requires a development application, all existing trees on the site are considered protected.39 UTILITIES AND ENERGY Energy The California Green Building Standards Code (Part 11, Title 24, known as “CALGreen”) was adopted as part of the California Building Standards Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations) to apply to the planning, design, operation, construction, use, and occupancy of every newly constructed building or 37 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 14, Streets, Sidewalks and Landscaping, Chapter 14.15, Landscape Ordinance. 38 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 14, Streets, Sidewalks and Landscaping, Chapter 14.12, Trees. 39 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 14, Streets, Sidewalks and Landscaping, Chapter 14.18, Protected Trees. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3-12 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT structure, unless otherwise indicated in the code, throughout the State of California. CALGreen established planning and design standards for sustainable site development, energy efficiency (in excess of the California Energy Code requirements), water conservation requiring new buildings to reduce water consumption by 20 percent, material conservation, and internal air contaminants. The local building permit process enforces the building efficiency standards. CMC Chapter 16.58, Green Building Standards Code Adopted, includes the CALGreen requirements with local amendments for projects in the city. The City’s Green Building Ordinance codifies green building techniques, including measures affecting water use efficiency and water conservation. CMC sections 16.58.100 through 16.58.220 sets forth the standards for green building requirements by type of building. As shown on Table 101.10 in CMC Section 16.58.220, non-residential new construction exceeding 50,000 square feet is required to be Silver in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED).40 CMC Section 16.58.230 permits applicants to apply an alternate green building standard for a project in lieu of the minimum standards outlined in CMC Section 16.58.220 that meet the same intent of conserving resources and reducing solid waste. Solid Waste Reduction Consistent with CALGreen, CMC Chapter 16.72, Recycling and Division of Construction and Demolition Waste, requires that a minimum of 65 percent of all non-hazardous construction and demolition debris must be recycled or salvaged and that all applicants have a waste management plan for on-site sorting of construction debris. Additionally, in December 2017, the City adopted a Zero Waste Policy.41 According to the Zero Waste Policy, the City would require, through the City’s waste hauling franchise agreement, steadfast and ongoing efforts by the City’s franchise to maintain a minimum residential and commercial waste diversion rate of 75 percent with a goal of reaching and maintaining 80 percent by 2025. Water Quality CMC Chapter 9.18, Storm Water Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, provides regulations and gives legal effect to the Municipal Regional Storm Water National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit (MRP) issued to the City. This chapter also ensures ongoing compliance with the most recent version of the City’s MRP regarding municipal storm water and urban runoff requirements. This chapter applies to all water entering the storm drain system generated on any private, public, developed, and undeveloped lands within the city. The CMC contains permit requirements for construction projects and new development or redevelopment projects to minimize the discharge of storm water runoff. 40 Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) is a green building certification program that recognizes best-in-class building strategies and practices that reduce consumption energy, and water, and reduce solid waste directly diverted to landfills. LEED certified buildings are ranked in order of efficiency from Certified, Silver, Gold and Platinum being the highest ranking with the greatest efficiency standard. LEED Silver certified buildings typically reduce is the third highest ranking out of the four, with just being certified being the lowest and Gold and Platinum being the second highest. 41 City of Cupertino, Public Works, Garbage & Recycling, https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/environment- sustainability/waste, accessed October 4, 2018. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PROJECT DESCRIPTION PLACEWORKS 3-13 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 3.2 PROJECT COMPONENTS The proposed project would redevelop the project site with a hotel and associated amenities with subterranean parking. The following provides a detailed description of the key project components. A complete set of preliminary site plans are available on the City’s website at www.cupertino.org/deanzahotel and at the City of Cupertino Community Development Department at 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014. HOTEL The conceptual site plan for the proposed project is shown on Figure 3-4. The proposed project would develop a seven-story hotel with up to 156 guest rooms and a rooftop terrace, lounge, and bar. The first/ground floor would be for guest amenities, which could include a lobby, reception area, exercise room, restaurant/bar, kitchen, conference rooms, and restrooms. The first floor would also include space for an administrative office, employee lounge, housekeeping, electrical, mechanical, trash/recycling, and storage. The second floor would have guest rooms and guest facilities, which could include lounge areas and outdoor terraces. One of the second-floor terraces would have a green roof. The third through the sixth floors would have guest rooms and lounge areas. Each floor with hotel rooms would include space for electrical, mechanical, trash/recycling, housekeeping, and storage. The ground-floor restaurant, bar, and kitchen would be approximately 4,200 square feet. The ground-floor conference space, approximately 4,300 square feet, would be provided in two rooms. The rooftop terrace, lounge, and bar would occupy an approximately 5,200-square-feet portion of the rooftop. The restaurant, bar, and conference facilities on the ground floor and the rooftop terrace, lounge and bar would be open to hotel guests and non-hotel customers. Guest rooms would include king, queen, and double rooms, and comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). See Figures 3-5 through 3-7. The proposed project would include solar panels, and the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment, commonly referred to as “HVAC ” systems, on the roof level. The HVAC system would be shielded from view by a six-foot metal rooftop panel (see Figure 3-8). The main vehicular parking area would be provided on four subterranean levels. At-grade parking spaces would be located near the drop- off/check-in area. ADA-compliant parking would be available above and below ground. A loading zone is proposed on the north side of the building away from the primary access point. The proposed project would include a valet service for hotel and restaurant guests. Class 1 bicycle parking spaces (bicycle lockers or secure rooms) would be provided in the subterranean parking levels. Class 2 bicycle parking spaces (publicly accessible bicycle racks) would be available for guests and employees near the main entrance. The main housekeeping services/storage area would be on the fourth level of the subterranean parking facility. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3-14 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT The hotel would have a FAR (Floor Area Ratio)42 of 2.5. As shown in Figures 3-9 and 3-10, the building would have a maximum height of 70 feet and 8 inches at the roofline, and a maximum height of 88 feet for the rooftop mechanical equipment and utility structures. The proposed project would have slope line (setback height) that would range from 0.18:1 to 0.22:1 from the face of the curb on North De Anza Boulevard.43 The proposed project would have balconies at each of the stories that overhang into the public right of way. Separate encroachment permits and agreements would be necessary to allow these encroachments, if approved by the City. The operation of the proposed hotel would generate 78 jobs.44 According to the project applicant, a maximum of 20 employees would be on site at a time. With an average of two guests per hotel room, the hotel would generate up to 312 guests at maximum capacity. The hotel conference rooms would accommodate up to approximately 700 attendees depending on the type of event (e.g., banquet or lecture). CIRCULATION AND ACCESS VEHICULAR, BICYCLE, AND PEDESTRIAN ACCESS As shown on Figure 3-4, vehicular and bicycle access to the project site would be provided via two limited- access (right-turn only) driveways located on North De Anza Boulevard: one located at the northern end of the project site and one located at the southern end of the project site. Both driveways would provide access to the passenger drop-off/pick-up area adjacent to the hotel lobby entrance on the south side of the proposed hotel, as well as to the underground parking garage. Both project driveways would also continue to serve the existing Homestead Square Shopping Center. The driveway widths at De Anza Boulevard would be 30 feet wide at the south access point and 32 feet and 4 inches wide at the north access point. Emergency vehicles would continue to access the site in much the same way it is accessed today. While the SCCFD and City of Cupertino Building Division would coordinate the review of building permits for precise final measurements, the preliminary plans have been designed to meet the turning radius requirements for emergency vehicles. A striped bike lane currently exists along North De Anza Boulevard between Stevens Creek Boulevard and Homestead Road. Bike lanes are lanes on roadways designated for use by bicycles with special lane markings, pavement legends, and signage. 42 The floor area ratio (FAR) is the ratio of the gross floor area of all buildings on a lot to the area of the lot. A hotel development does not have a FAR limit for the Commercial/Retail General Plan Land Use designation or General Commercial with special development regulations (CG-rg) Zoning District. 43 The primary building bulk is below a 1:1 slope line (i.e., 1 foot of setback for every 1 foot of building height.) 44 Assumes one job (employee) for every two hotel rooms (156 rooms/2 employees = 78 employees). Note that the City now applies a different standard for determining employees than was used for the General Plan EIR, which was 0.3 employees per hotel room (0.3 x 250 = 75 employees). Figure 3-4 Conceptual Site Plan A5.00 1 A5.012 A5.00 A5.01 2 1 221' - 4"127' - 0"30' - 0"5' - 9 1/2" 0° 13' 00" 121.90' N W 89° 47' 00"21.99'SW0° 13' 00" 186.72' N W 89° 47' 00"191.75'NE0° 02' 49" 308.62' S W89° 47' 00"168.34'SWDE ANZA BOULEVARD 5 6 7 8 9 10 40' - 0"LOADING ZONENO PARKINGFH FH 5' - 9" 5' - 4"9' - 0"32'-6"/-20'-2"+/-9' - 4"5' - 0"32'-6"+/- 226' - 0" CUPERTINO HOTEL 26' - 1"4 11 SHOPPING CENTER RETAIL RETAIL NEW HOTEL DECORATIVE PAVING AT ENTRY DRIVE (E) DRIVEWAY, AC PAVING 6th FLOOR WALL LINE BELOW TERRACE ON 2nd STORY BELOW GREEN ROOF ON 2nd STORY BELOW MECH EQUIP SCREEN WALL ELEVATORS 1 & 2 ROOF STAIR 1 ROOF BAR ROOF HOUSE KEEPING ELEVATOR ROOF DEDICATION LINE ROOF TERRACE MECH EQUIP SCREEN WALL 6th FLOOR ROOF All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute original and unpublished work of the Designer and may not, without written consent of the Designer, be duplicated, used, or disclosed in whole or in part for design, fabrications, or construction of any building, structure, or improvement, or portion thereof, other than the specific project to which it pertains. Date Sheet Date Scale Drawn Job Sheet c Winkleman Designs 2018 Winkleman Designs 1795 Amaya Ridge Road Soquel, CA 95073 Tel 408-353-6700 Fax 408-353-4729 bill@winklemandesigns.com R E V I S I O N S N 1" = 20'-0"C:\Users\Bill\Documents\DAH-CEN19_7Story_Final_bill@winklemandesigns.com.rvt4/21/2019 7:52:47 PM 11/13/18 4/19/19 W 17200 A1.00 Site PlanThe De AnzaDe Anza Properties10931 N De Anza Blvd, Cupertino, CANo. Date Description Source: Winkleman Designs, 2019. PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PLACEWORKS Figure 3-5 First Floor Plan UP UP UP A5.00 1 A5.012 A5.00 A5.01 2 1 1 A5.13 A B C D E F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 17' - 0"32' - 0"32' - 0"32' - 0"32' - 0"32' - 0"32' - 0"17' - 0"23' - 0"25' - 0"31' - 0"31' - 0"17' - 0"1 A5.12 1 A5.11 1 A5.10 GARAGE RAMP DOWN STAIR 1 25' - 8" STAIR 2 HK ELEV 2259SF 1983SF CORRIDOR CONFERENCE TOTAL = 4242SF OFFICE BELL/BAG/VALET TRASH KITCHEN PRE-FUNCTION 2 CHECK-IN EL1 EL2 EL314' - 7 1/2"PRE-FUNCTION 1 1 A5.14 1 A5.15 36' - 10" WOMEN 944SF CONFERENCE 1EXERCISE PRE-FUNCTION 3 CONFERENCE 2 LOBBY PORTE COCHERE MEN 127' - 0"1 13' - 6"5' - 0"11' - 6"7' - 8 3/4"STOR ART GARAGE MECHANICAL ROOM ABOVE 3' - 6"EXHAUST 100' - 3"46' - 6"51' - 0 3/4"39' - 7 3/4"31' - 0"20' - 9"31' - 3"38' - 4 1/2"15' - 6"25' - 6"37' - 1 3/4" 27' - 3 1/2"29' - 7 1/2"8' - 0" 21' - 8" 13' - 3 1/2"19' - 4 1/2"8' - 9"DE ANZA TERRACE RESTAURANT AND BAR 21' - 6"29'-7"+/-VEST 2256SF 1983SF 0' - 0"11' - 3"5' - 1"18' - 5" 2' - 0"8' - 3 1/2"4CY 4CY 4CY 18' - 0" 15' - 6"7' - 10" 11' - 2"9' - 4"10' - 2"22' - 6" TABLES TABLES PLANTER SERVICE RECEPTION BAR 226' - 0" 48'-2"+/-23'-0".15' - 0"12'-4".78 Source: Winkleman Design, 2019. 0 Scale (Feet) 32 PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PLACEWORKS Figure 3-6 Second Floor Plan UPUP UP A5.00 A5.012 A5.00 A5.01 2 1 1 A5.13 A B C C D E F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 A5.12 1 A5.11 1 A5.10 14' - 2 1/2"14' - 2 1/2"6' - 0"201202203 220 221 219 223222 224 225 226227228 213212 211 210 209 208 207 206 205 204 7' - 0"214 215 216 217 218 6' - 0"11' - 2"LOBBY STAIR 1 STAIR 2 HK ELEV 14' - 2 1/2"13' - 9 1/2"14' - 0 1/2"7' - 0"13' - 11 1/2"30' - 9 1/2"29' - 11 1/2"46' - 4 3/4"36' - 5 1/2"7' - 0"11' - 2 1/2" 14' - 4 3/4"32' - 0"32' - 0" GREEN ROOF PATIO 229 14' - 6" 14' - 5 3/4"14' - 10 1/2" 23015' - 3"36' - 4"66' - 7 1/4"94' - 0 3/4"65' - 4" TERRACE 26' - 6 1/2" 12' - 0" 7' - 0" ELEC LOUNGE 7' - 0"1' - 4"HK 8' - 0"BALCONYBALCONY, TYP EL2EL1 231 LOUNGE STORAGE 23' - 0"25' - 0"31' - 0"31' - 0"17' - 0"13' - 3 1/4"15' - 4"12' - 0"28' - 0"124' - 0"51' - 0" 14' - 6 1/2"14' - 6 1/2"14' - 6 1/2"14' - 6"14' - 6" 17' - 0"32' - 0"32' - 0"32' - 0"32' - 0"32' - 0"32' - 0"17' - 0" 14' - 6 1/2"14' - 6 1/2"14' - 6 1/2"14' - 6 1/2"14' - 6 1/2" 13' - 3 3/4" 1 A5.14 1 A5.15 111' - 0"111' - 0"26' - 10 1/2"31' - 7 1/4"4' - 11"10' - 10"4' - 10"14' - 2"14' - 1" 16' - 0"15' - 1" 14' - 0" 14' - 5 3/4" 14' - 6 1/2"2' - 0"9' - 0"21' - 8"12' - 8"5' - 4"11' - 6"2' - 8"11' - 6"5' - 4"11' - 6"2' - 8"9' - 0"5' - 4 1/2"14' - 9 1/2"1' - 8 1/4"2' - 3"7' - 0" 1 5' - 1"5' - 9"5' - 1"1' - 3"5' - 3" 27' - 4" 5' - 0" 5' - 0"9' - 1 1/32"6' - 0"6' - 0"6' - 8" 5'-4".4'-4".7' - 4 3/256" 1702sf 3635sf - Terrace 1702sf - Green Roof 653sf - Planters 418sf - Planters (C3) 16' - 6" ACCESS HATCH FROM MECH MEZZANINE BELOW RUNOFF FILTRATION PLANTER RUNOFF FILTRATION PLANTER PLANTER, TYP PLANTER, TYP STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF WITH INTEGRAL GUTTER 15' - 6" 16' - 3" 11' - 2"9' - 4"10' - 2"DEDICATION LINE 6" INBOARD FROM SIDEWALK EASEMENT LINE BELOW, SCD 1'-10"+/-3'-6"+/-226' - 0"127' - 0"6' - 8"6'-8".6' - 8"8' - 0"6'-8".All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute original and unpublished work of the Designer and may not, without written consent of the Designer, be duplicated, used, or disclosed in whole or in part for design, fabrications, or construction of any building, structure, or improvement, or portion thereof, other than the specific project to which it pertains. Date Sheet Date Scale Drawn Job Sheet c Winkleman Designs 2018 Winkleman Designs 1795 Amaya Ridge Road Soquel, CA 95073 Tel 408-353-6700 Fax 408-353-4729 bill@winklemandesigns.com R E V I S I O N S No. Date Description Source: Winkleman Design, 2019. 0 Scale (Feet) 32 PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PLACEWORKS Figure 3-7 Third Floor Plan UP A5.012 A5.00 A5.01 2 1 1 A5.13 A B C D E F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 A5.12 1 A5.11 1 A5.10 1 A5.14 1 A5.15 1 A5.11c A5.01C 1 A5.00C 2 1 A5.13c6' - 0"10' - 4" 23' - 6"23' - 6" 301302303 320 321 319 323322 324 325 326327328 313312 311 310 309 308 307 306 305 304 314 315 316 317 318 LOBBY 329330331 STAIR 1 HK ELEV ELEC LOUNGE HK EL 2 EL 1 LOUNGE STORAGE STAIR 2 DEDICATION LINE 6" INBOARD FROM SIDEWALK EASEMENT LINE BELOW1'-7"+/-4' - 6 1/4"BALCONY, TYP BALCONY, TYP BALCONY, TYP BALCONY, TYP BALCONY, TYP BALCONY, TYP 4th, 5th and 6th FLOORS SIMILAR Source: Winkleman Design, 2019. 0 Scale (Feet) 32 PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PLACEWORKS Figure 3-8 Roof Plan A5.012 A5.00 2 1 A5.13 A B C D E F 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 A5.12 1 A5.11 1 A5.10 1 A5.14 1 A5.15 EL2 STAIR 1 MECH EQUIP METAL PANEL SCREEN WALL PV PANELS STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFING WITH INTEGRAL GUTTER, 4:12 PITCH, TYP UON PVC SINGLE PLY ROOFING, TYP AT LOW SLOPE ROOFS HK ELEV STAIR 2 EXHAUST 15' - 6"10' - 2"WINE TASTING 62' - 0"6' - 0"6' - 6"PREP BAR LOUNGE RR RR 11' - 4"FOYER 21' - 10"ROOF TERRACE ELEV LOBBY 2903sf 1225sf ROOF LINE ABOVE DEDICATION LINE 6" INBOARD FROM SIDEWALK EASEMENT LINE BELOW5'-8"+/-4'-10"+/-3'-6"+/-2'-8"+/-5' - 10"5' - 2" ELEC BAR STORAGE BALCONY WINE STOR 248sf 63' - 0" 58 24 8 TRANSOM WINDOWS ABOVE, SEE ELEVATIONS TRANSOM WINDOWS ABOVE, SEE ELEVATIONS TEMP GL TO 6'AFF ABOVE 2'-6" HIGH CONC WALL, TYP Source: Winkleman Design, 2019. 0 Scale (Feet) 32 PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PLACEWORKS 2nd18' - 0" 3rd28' - 2" 4th38' - 4" 5th48' - 6" 1 A5.13 7' - 4"10' - 0"12' - 0"10' - 2"10' - 2"10' - 2"10' - 2"18' - 0"1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Stair Roof80' - 8" 1 A5.14 1 A5.15 Roof70' - 8" Elevator Roof88' - 0" BFC GL1 SC M5 M1 SSR BFC GL3 GL1GL1M3 GL1 GL1 BFC GL2 GL1GL1 STR 6th58' - 8" M1 M1 M1 GL2 GL3 M3M3 SC BFC M1 M3M3M3 M1 GL3GL3 METAL PANEL ROOF SCREEN M1 Bar Roof82' - 8" GL3GL3 GL1GL1 GL1 GL1 GL1 GL1 GL3 GL1 METAL PANEL ROOF SCREEN 1st0' - 0" 2nd18' - 0" 3rd28' - 2" 4th38' - 4" 5th48' - 6" 1 A5.13 123456789 18' - 0"10' - 2"10' - 2"10' - 2"Stair Roof80' - 8" 1 A5.14 1 A5.15 Roof70' - 8" Elevator Roof88' - 0" M4 M3 M3 GL1MP1GL1BFCGL3 GL1 M3 M3 M1 GL1 GL2 MP2 GL3 BFC BFC 7'+/- METAL PANEL ROOF SCREEN GL1 GL1 GL2BFC [980]32' - 2"[224]7' - 4"6th58' - 8" M4 M1 BFC M3 M2M2M3M3 BFC M2 M2 Bar Roof82' - 8" BFC GL2 BFC GL3 GL3 GL3 GL3GL3 SC 5'+/- METAL PANEL ROOF SCREEN Figure 3-9 West and East Elevations West East Source: Winkleman Design, 2019. PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PLACEWORKS 1st0' - 0" 2nd18' - 0" 3rd28' - 2" 4th38' - 4" 5th48' - 6" ABCDEF1 A5.12 1 A5.11 1 A5.10 Stair Roof80' - 8" 1 A5.11c Roof70' - 8" Elevator Roof88' - 0" M3 BFC M3 BFC GL2M3M2M2 GL1 GL1 GL2BFC M5 GL1 BFC BFC 6th58' - 8" M2 SSR GL3 GL3 SC SC BFC M1 M1 M5 M1 Bar Roof82' - 8" BFC GL2 SC GL1 GL1 GL1 BFC 1st0' - 0" 2nd18' - 0" 3rd28' - 2" 4th38' - 4" 5th48' - 6" A B C D E F1 A5.12 1 A5.111 A5.10 Stair Roof80' - 8" 1 A5.11c Roof70' - 8" Elevator Roof88' - 0" BFC BFC M2 GL1 M1 M5 SSR M5 M3 7'+/- METAL PANEL ROOF SCREEN 6th58' - 8" M2M2M3 M1 BFC SC SC SSR SC M1 M1 GL1 M2 BFC Bar Roof82' - 8" GL1GL1GL1GL1GL1GL1 GL1 GL3 M3M3 M1M1 M1 M1 BFC 5'+/- METAL PANEL ROOF SCREEN GL2 GL2 GL1 CLEAR GLASS BLOCK, TYP M2 All drawings and written material appearing herein constitute original and unpublished work of the Designer and may not, without written consent of the Designer, be duplicated, used, or disclosed in whole or in part for design, fabrications, or construction of any building, structure, or improvement, or portion thereof, other than the specific project to which it pertains. Date Sheet Date Scale Drawn Job Sheet c Winkleman Designs 2018 Winkleman Designs 1795 Amaya Ridge Road Soquel, CA 95073 Tel 408-353-6700 Fax 408-353-4729 bill@winklemandesigns.com No. Date Description Source: Winkleman Design, 2019. Figure 3-10 North and South Elevations North South PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PLACEWORKS THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3-22 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Pedestrian entrances into the hotel would be located on the north, east, and south sides of the building. A walkway that connects to the North De Anza Boulevard sidewalk surrounds the project site for protected pedestrian access. Pedestrian facilities consist of sidewalks, crosswalks, and pedestrian signals at signalized intersections. In the vicinity of the project site, sidewalks exist along both sides of North De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road, providing pedestrian access to and from the project site. Pedestrians can also access the project site via the parking lot of the adjacent Homestead Square Shopping Center. TRANSIT Transit services are provided by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) and Caltrain. Access to the existing bus service (Local Bus Routes 55 and 81) is provided via bus stops located near the southwestern, southeastern, and northwestern corners of the North De Anza Boulevard/Homestead Road intersection, approximately a two-minute walk (about 500 feet) to and from the project site. Local Route 55 provides transit service from De Anza College to Great America Parkway between 5:38 a.m. and 10:54 p.m., with 15- to 35-minute headways. Local Route 81 provides transit service from Moffett Field/Ames Center to San Jose State University between 6:06 a.m. and 9:04 p.m., with 25- to 35-minute headways. Caltrain is a commuter heavy rail service that runs from downtown San Francisco (4th and King Streets) to downtown San Jose (Diridon Station), with a limited number of commute period trains running farther south to Gilroy. The nearest station to the project site is the Sunnyvale Station, which is located on West Evelyn Avenue approximately 3 miles north of the project site. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The proposed project would incorporate a transportation demand management (TDM) program in the form of a dedicated shuttle program for hotel employees and guests. The shuttle destinations would be determined based on hotel employee and guest needs. The hotel shuttle would offset transportation related GHG emissions and to reduce overall vehicle miles traveled. This measure is proposed by the project applicant and is included in the Transportation Impact Analysis prepared by Hexagon Transportation Consultants dated May 16, 2019 and included in Appendix D of this Initial Study. The proposed hotel would be responsible for ensuring that the TDM trip reduction measure is implemented. A designated on-site TDM coordinator would be responsible for implementing the ongoing TDM measure and reporting progress to the City of Cupertino annually. LANDSCAPING The proposed project would result in approximately 2,100 square feet of pervious landscaped surfaces. The project site would include landscaping that surrounds the hotel structure (see Figure 3-4 above). All 11 existing trees would remain as part of the project and 14 new trees would be added for a total of 25 trees. The proposed landscaping would be consistent with the surrounding landscape and would include native and/or adaptive, and drought resistant plant materials of similar water use grouped by hydrozones. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PROJECT DESCRIPTION PLACEWORKS 3-23 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT The majority of plantings would be drought tolerant grasses, shrubs, and trees that, once established, are adapted to a dry summer and intermittent rain in the winter season. As stated above in Section 1.1.4.2, Zoning, the project is required to submit a Landscape Project Submittal for approval by the City. LIGHT AND GLARE The source, intensity, and type of exterior lighting for the project site would generally be provided for the purpose of orienting site users and for safety needs. All on-site lighting would be low-level illumination and shielded to reduce light spill or glare into surrounding buildings. There would be no up-lighting on the building exterior. In landscaped and paved areas, light sources would be concealed and not visible from a public viewpoint. Energy conservation measures would be used as part of interior lighting for the new building, such as employing automatic sensors to turn off lights when guests are not present in guest rooms. The HVAC system would be shielded from view by a six-foot metal rooftop panel (see Figure 3-8). The proposed project would not include reflective glass. Where glass features are considered, glazing treatments will vary and none of the exterior glass would have a light reflectance value of more than 15 percent. The second-floor balconies and the roof top area would include railing elements, which would have UV coatings, frosting, and fritting, which reduces glare and makes the glass visible to birds to reduce collisions. UTILITIES The proposed utility infrastructure uses existing connections to the water, sewer, storm drain system, natural gas and electricity network in the area, and would be served by an existing solid waste landfill. WATER SUPPLY AND CONSERVATION The project site is located within the California Water Service (Cal Water) Los Altos Suburban District (LASD) service area, and Cal Water would supply water for the project. The proposed project would connect to existing water lines along North De Anza Boulevard. The project incorporates a number of features meant to conserve water used for on-site irrigation. The irrigation water on the site would be dual-sourced recycled water and potable water as available from the LASD. Any lawn areas would can use 100 percent recycled water. All landscape zones would be irrigated as required by the Cupertino Landscape Ordinance, and water uses would be tailored to meet CALGreen Building Standards which, as described in Section 1.1.4.2, Zoning, requires water conservation and requires new buildings to reduce water consumption by 20 percent. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE The project site is located within the Cupertino Sanitary District (CSD) service area and wastewater would be treated at the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant (SJ/SCWPCP). The project would use existing connections to the sanitary sewer system on North De Anza Boulevard and a sewer easement from the Homestead Square Shopping Center through the project site; therefore, no new connections THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3-24 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT would be needed and are not proposed as part of the project. The proposed project includes upsizing existing 6-inch sewer line to 8 inches. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The proposed project would result in an increase in the amount of impervious surfaces from 38,380 square feet to 49,918 square feet. The project would comply with the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program C.3 requirements, which include minimization of impervious surfaces, measures to detain or infiltrate runoff from peak flows to match pre-development conditions, and agreements to ensure maintenance of the stormwater treatment and flow control facilities in perpetuity. Additionally, the project would comply with CMC Chapter 9.18 described above in Section 3.1.4.2, Zoning, which is intended to provide regulations and give legal effect to certain requirements of the NPDES permit issued to the City. Existing connections to the storm drain line on North De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Square Shopping Center are not expected to change; however, the proposed project would provide several bioretention water treatment areas at ground level, as raised flow-through planters, and drainage management areas on the project site. When combined, the on-site water treatment areas would meet the required treatment areas of 1,997 square feet. SOLID WASTE SERVICES Recology South Bay (Recology) would provide curbside recycling, garbage, and compost and landscaping waste service to the hotel.45 All non-hazardous solid waste collected under the Recology franchise agreement is taken to Newby Island Sanitary Landfill for processing. Under the agreement between the City and Recology, Recology also handles recyclable materials (at no cost to customers). The proposed waste management for the proposed project would focus on waste, recycling, and composting. OTHER UTILITIES (GAS, ELECTRIC, AND CABLE) Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) would supply natural gas and electricity infrastructure to the project site. The source of electricity would be provided through a partnership of Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE) and PG&E, which provides a standard electricity offering from a 50 percent renewable portfolio.46 SVCE also offers a 100 percent renewable option that electricity customers can opt into. Additionally, the proposed development would achieve LEED Silver, or Alternative Reference Standard, consistent with the City’s requirements. Sustainability features such as environmentally preferable building products and photovoltaic generation system (commonly referred to as a PV system or solar panels) are proposed on the rooftop (see Figure 3-8). AT&T and other providers would provide telephone service. Cable television service would be available from a number of providers, including Comcast. 45 City of Cupertino, Garbage and Recycling, https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/environment- sustainability/waste, accessed on January 16, 2019. 46 Silicon Valley Clean Energy. 2019. Your Choices. https://www.svcleanenergy.org/choices/, accessed on May 2, 2019 at THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PROJECT DESCRIPTION PLACEWORKS 3-25 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT CONSTRUCTION PHASE Demolition and construction would take place over a 2-year period, which is anticipated to begin in August 2020 and end in 2022, subject to regulatory approval.47 DEMOLITION AND SITE PREPARATION The proposed project would demolish the existing 8,323-square-foot building and 17,700 square feet of paved surfaces. No existing trees would be removed. Table 3-1 shows the construction phase and the length of time estimated to complete each phase. Equipment that will likely be used for demolition and site preparation would include a combination of concrete/industrial saws, rubber-tired bulldozers, graders, tractors, loaders, and backhoes. The proposed project would require up to 72,000 cubic yards of cut. Demolition debris, including soil from excavation, would be off hauled for disposal at the Zanker Materials Recovery and Landfill in San Jose, which is approximately 12 miles from the project site. This would be done in accordance with the CMC Chapter 16.72, Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Waste.48 CONSTRUCTION As shown in Table 3-1, the longest construction phase is the building of the hotel, which would take place over a 16-month period followed by much shorter time periods for paving and painting. Project construction would result in an approximately 129,000-square-foot hotel building, 88,000-square-foot subterranean garage, and 18,000-square-foot driveway and surface parking. Approximately 2,100 square feet of landscaping would also be installed. The total area to be disturbed during construction would be 1.29 acres. The construction site and staging areas would be clearly marked, and construction fencing would be installed. All staging areas would occur on site and no staging would occur in the public right-of- way. A combination of on- and off-site parking facilities for construction workers would be identified during demolition, grading, and construction. 47 New buildings would be constructed to the California 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (effective January 1, 2020). 48 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 16, Building and Construction, Chapter 16.72, Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Waste. TABLE 3-1 DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION PHASING Activity Phase 1 (work days) Demolition 10 Site Preparation 5 Grading 30 Building Construction 425 Paving 10 Painting 20 Source. Based on information from the project applicant, California Emissions Estimator Model Version 2016.3.25, and PlaceWorks, 2019. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3-26 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 3.3 REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS Following approval of this Initial Study and adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the following discretionary permits and approvals from the City would be required for the proposed project:  General Plan Amendment  Development Agreement  Development Permit  Encroachment Agreement  Architectural and Site Approval Permit  Use Permit In addition, permits for demolition, grading, encroachments and building, and a certificate of occupancy would be required from the City. 3.4 VOLUNTARY COMMUNITY AMENITIES The proposed project would provide the following community benefits:  complementary use of conference facilities for public schools within Cupertino and City of Cupertino for up to 12 days per year;  reduced rate for use of hotel shuttle for Cupertino residents for airport transportation needs on the hotel’s schedule;  funding of a one-time payment of $500,000; and  an enclosed or unenclosed rooftop amenity, including but not limited to a deck, bar, or restaurant, with public access, not to exceed the height of any rooftop mechanical equipment enclosure. Final fees and voluntary community benefits would be determined upon approval of the project. PLACEWORKS 4-1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Environmental Analysis 4.1 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION As described in Chapter 1, Introduction, under the subheading “Tiering Process,” the General Plan EIR contains an analysis of the project site, which is within Study Area 1 (Cupertino Hotel and Goodyear Tire) of the General Plan EIR, which assumed potential redevelopment of the site, including a five-story hotel with up to 250 rooms and conference facilities and a maximum height of 145 feet. The cumulative impacts, in conjunction with overall General Plan buildout, were evaluated as part of the General Plan EIR. The proposed project is anticipated to be complete in 2022 (subject to regulatory approval); thus, this Initial Study presents a focused analysis to evaluate the near-term impacts of the proposed project under existing and cumulative conditions. Consistent with the analysis presented in the General Plan EIR, and due to the proposed project’s location in an urbanized city setting, the project would not have a significant effect on agriculture, forestry or mineral resources. Maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency categorize land within Cupertino as Urban and Built-Up Land.49 In addition, according to the 2006 mapping data from the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, the city does not contain any woodland or forestland cover.50 Finally, the city does not contain land zoned for farmland or timberland production.51 Consequently, there would be no impacts with regard to agriculture and forestry resources. The project site is within an area designated as Mineral Resource Zone 3, which is an area containing mineral deposits for which the significance cannot be evaluated from available data.52 Consequently, because the site has been developed and is not considered suitable for protection or conservation, there would be no impacts to mineral resources. For these reasons, these topics are not discussed further in this Initial Study. Senate Bill (SB) 743 became effective on January 1, 2014 and, among other provisions, SB 743 amended CEQA by adding Public Resources Code Section 21099 regarding analysis of aesthetics, parking, and traffic impacts for urban infill projects. The following is a discussion of how aesthetics and parking are treated in SB 743. 49 California Resources Agency, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. Santa Clara County Important Farmland 2010, accessed on July 23, 2018. 50 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Fire and Resource Assessment Program, Land Cover Map, accessed on July 23, 2018. 51 City of Cupertino, Zoning Map, http://www.cupertino.org/index.aspx?page=291, accessed on July 23, 2018. 52 City of Cupertino, General Plan Community Vision 2015–2040, Chapter 6, Environmental Resources and Sustainability, Figure ES-2, Mineral Resources. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-2 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT CEQA Section 21099(d)(1), states, “Aesthetic and parking impacts of a residential, mixed-use residential, or employment center project on an infill site located within a transit priority area shall not be considered significant impacts on the environment.” Accordingly, aesthetics and parking are no longer to be considered in determining if a project has the potential to result in significant environmental effects if the project meets the following criteria:  Is located on an infill site,  Is a residential, mixed-use residential, or an employment center, and  Is located in a transit priority area. As described below, the proposed hotel is located on a site that meets the definition of an infill site and the proposed project is a qualified “employment center” but the site does not meet the definition of a designated “transit priority area” pursuant to SB 743:  Infill Site: An infill site is defined as “a lot located within an urban area that has been previously developed or on a vacant site where at least 75 percent of the perimeter of the site adjoins or is separated only by an improved public right-of-way from, parcels that are developed with qualified urban uses.” The site is currently developed with a commercial building (Goodyear Tire). Surrounding uses include commercial buildings in the Homestead Square and parking lots to the north and west, the existing Aviare Apartment complex to the east across North De Anza Boulevard, and Cupertino Hotel to the south. Hence, the site qualifies as infill.  Employment Center: An employment center is defined as “a project located on property zoned for commercial uses with a FAR of no less than 0.75 and that is located within a transit priority area.” The project site is within the General Commercial with special development regulations (CG-rg) Zoning District. The proposed hotel would have a FAR of 2.5.53  Transit Priority Area: A transit priority area is defined as “an area within one-half mile of a major transit stop that exists or planned, if the planned stop is scheduled to be completed within the planning horizon included in a Transportation Improvement Program adopted pursuant to Section 450.216 or 450.322 of Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regulations. As shown in Table 4-14 in section XV, Transportation, below, the project site is not within a half mile of a “major transit stop” as defined by CEQA section 21064.3 (the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods) and CEQA section 21155(b) (a high-quality transit corridor means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours). 53 The floor area ratio (FAR) is the ratio of the gross floor area of all buildings on a lot to the area of the lot. A hotel development does not have a FAR limit for the Commercial/Retail General Plan Land Use designation or General Commercial with special development regulations (CG-rg) Zoning District. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Bus Stops 55 and 81 are located near each of the corners of the North De Anza Boulevard/Homestead Road intersection, approximately a two- minute walk (about 500 feet or 0.1 miles) from the project site but they do not meet the 15-minute frequency of service interval.54 Local Route 55 provides transit service from De Anza College to Great America Parkway between 5:38 a.m. and 10:54 p.m., with 15- to 35-minute headways. Local Route 81 provides transit service from Moffett Field/Ames Center to San Jose State University between 6:06 a.m. and 9:04 p.m., with 25- to 35-minute headways. Additionally, while the project site is in the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority City Cores, Corridors & Station Areas PDA, this PDA is not a recognized Transit Priority Area.55 Since the site does not meet the criteria in SB 743, the aesthetic-related impacts are discussed in Section I, Aesthetics, of this Initial Study. With respect to parking impacts, effective in 2010, parking inadequacy as significant environmental impact was eliminated from the CEQA Guidelines by The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, which is the entity charged with drafting guidelines to help agencies implement CEQA. Accordingly, parking adequacy is not discussed further in this Initial Study. Items identified in each section of the environmental checklist below are discussed following that section. Required mitigation measures are identified where necessary to reduce a projected impact to a level that is determined to be less than significant. All impacts were found to be less than significant or less than significant with mitigation. I. AESTHETICS Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099 (transit priority area/major transit stop), would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?     b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway?     c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publically accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?     d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?     54 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, Bus Schedules for Bus 55 and 81. http://www.vta.org/routes/rt55 and http://www.vta.org/routes/rt81, respectively; accessed on January 4, 2019. 55 Plan Bay Area, Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG)/Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Priority Development Area (PDA) and Transit Priority Area (TPA) Map for CEQA Streamlining, https://www.planbayarea.org/pda-tpa-map, accessed on January 4, 2019. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-4 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT GENERAL PLAN EIR Chapter 4.1, Aesthetics, of the General Plan EIR, addresses the impacts to visual resources associated with maximum building heights up to 145 feet for future buildings on the project site. Impacts at this maximum height were found to be less than significant. EXISTING CONDITIONS The project site contains an existing one-story (approximately 18 feet tall) commercial building that is bordered by surface parking, a sidewalk along De Anza Boulevard, and mature trees. Surrounding uses include the one-story (30 feet tall) buildings in the Homestead Square shopping center to the north and west, the three-story (approximately 45 feet) Aviare Apartments to the east, and the four-story (approximately 45 feet) Cupertino Hotel to the south. DISCUSSION a) Would the proposed project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? As discussed in Chapter 4.1, Aesthetics, of the General Plan EIR, the proposed project would have the potential to affect scenic vistas and/or scenic corridors if the new intensified development on the project site blocked views of areas that provide or contribute to such vistas. Potential effects could include blocking views of a scenic vista/corridor from specific publicly accessible vantage points or the alteration of the overall scenic vista/corridor itself. Such alterations could be positive or negative, depending on the characteristics of the project site and the subjective perception of observers. Public views of scenic corridors are views seen along a linear transportation route and public views of scenic vistas are views of specific scenic features. Scenic vistas are generally interpreted as long-range views, while scenic corridors are comprised of short-, middle-, and long-range views. The General Plan does not have designated scenic corridors or vistas. However, for purposes of this analysis, the westward views of the foothills and ridgelines of the Santa Cruz Mountains are considered scenic vistas, and the segment of I-280 from Santa Clara County line on the west to I-880 on the east also is considered a scenic corridor. The analysis in the General Plan EIR found that an increase of building height of up to 145 feet would result in a less-than-significant impact to the long-range views of the Santa Cruz Mountain Range and foothills because the maximum heights of the existing on-site and surrounding buildings and mature trees, currently limit the opportunity for views of scenic vistas from street-level public viewing and because the project location is not considered a destination public viewing point nor is it visible from scenic vistas. As described in Chapter 3, Project Description, of this Initial Study, the existing building would be removed and replaced by the proposed building that would consist of a seven-story building with a rooftop terrace, lounge, and bar over four levels of below-grade parking, and would be 70 feet and 8 inches at the roofline THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT and 88 feet at the highest point (rooftop mechanical equipment and utility structures). All 11 of the existing trees, which range in height from about 20 to 50 feet, would remain as part of the proposed project. Because the proposed project would involve height increases that are less than what was evaluated in then General Plan EIR, and because existing conditions currently limit views of scenic resources combined with the fact that the site and surrounding areas are not destination viewing locations, impacts would remain consistent with the conclusions in the General Plan EIR and would be less than significant. b) Would the proposed project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? As discussed in Chapter 4.1, Aesthetics, of the General Plan EIR, the segment of I-280 in Cupertino is not an officially designated State Scenic Highway but is considered to be eligible to be designated as a State Scenic Highway. The section of I-280 that is near the project site is at a lower elevation. Any views of the mountains are currently impeded by the existing tree canopy along I-280, the one-story (approximately 30 feet) buildings in the Homestead Shopping Center, the four-story (approximately 45-feet) Cupertino Hotel, and three-story (approximately 45-feet) Aviare Apartments buildings. There would be no changes from the I-280 viewshed because the freeway is located south of the site and the project site is not visible from that location. Impacts to views of scenic resources from the I-280 view corridor were determined to be less than significant in the General Plan EIR. Because the project proposes height increases that would be less than what is evaluated in then General Plan EIR and existing conditions currently limit views of scenic resources, including those from the I-280 viewshed, project impacts would remain consistent with the conclusions in the General Plan EIR and would be less than significant. c) Would the proposed project substantially degrade the existing visual character in non-urbanized areas, or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? Is the project in an urbanized area, and would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? The project site is in an urbanized area that is not a designated or otherwise identified as a public viewing location for surrounding scenic views. Additionally, public views of scenic resources including the westward views of the foothills and ridgelines of the Santa Cruz Mountains and the segment of I-280 from Santa Clara County line on the west to I-880 on the east are partially obstructed due to the natural topography and the existing buildings in the project area. The proposed project would result in a change from the existing one-story (approximately 18 feet tall) commercial building to a seven-story hotel building with a rooftop terrace, lounge, and bar. The project site is within the General Commercial with special development regulations (CG-rg) zoning district, which is intended to provide a means of guiding land development or redevelopment of the city that is uniquely suited for planned coordination of land uses and requires a driveway that is equal to the width of three THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-6 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT cars.56 The proposed project includes a General Plan Amendment to reduce the slope line (setback height) and increase the height.57 The proposed development would be required to provide suitable setbacks from public rights-of-way and appropriate buffers and/or height transitions for buildings adjacent to low- density residential development. Furthermore, the proposed project would increase the landscaping to include 14 new trees in addition to the 11 existing trees that currently surround the perimeter of the project site. Combined, the existing and proposed trees would help to preserve the existing visual setting. The project is separated from the Homestead Square Shopping Center to the west by an approximately 20-foot (two-lanes) wide internal roadway, from the Commercial/Retail building to the north by an approximately 40-foot (three-lanes) wide driveway, from the Aviare Apartments to the east by North De Anza Boulevard, which is approximately 150 feet (six-lanes) wide including the landscaped median, and from Cupertino Hotel building to the south by an approximately 34-foot (two-lane) wide driveway.58 The roadway and existing landscaping would remain intact and continue to serve as a buffer between the project site and the surrounding land uses. Furthermore, the project is subject to the City’s discretionary review processes, including the Development Permit and Architectural and Site Approval Review, in accordance with Chapters 19.12 and 19.168 of the Zoning Ordinance, which would ensure the proposed project would harmonize with adjacent development and not degrade the existing visual quality of the site and surrounding land uses. Accordingly, consistent with the conclusions of the General Plan EIR, the proposed project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character of the site and its surroundings, and impacts would remain less than significant. d) Would the proposed project create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Nighttime illumination and glare impacts are the effects on adjoining uses and areas of a project’s exterior lighting. Light and glare impacts are determined through a comparison of the existing light sources with the proposed lighting plan or policies. As discussed in Chapter 4.1, Aesthetics, of the General Plan EIR, the project site and surrounding area contains many existing sources of nighttime illumination. These include street and parking area lights, security lighting, and exterior lighting on existing commercial and residential buildings. Additional on-site light and glare is caused by surrounding land uses and traffic on surrounding roadways. As described in Chapter 3, Project Description, of this Initial Study, the source, intensity, and type of exterior lighting for the project site would be typical for becoming orientated and safety needs. All on-site lighting would be low-level illumination and shielded to reduce light spill or glare. There would be no up-lighting on the building exterior. All exterior surface and above-ground mounted fixtures would be complementary to the existing architectural theme. The existing roadways as well as the existing and proposed surface parking and landscaping surrounding the project would act as a buffer to 56 The City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 19, Zoning, Chapter 19.60, General Commercial, Section 19.60.010, Purpose. 57 The primary building bulk is below a 1:1 slope line (i.e., 1 foot of setback for every 1 foot of building height.) 58 The existing driveways off North De Anza Boulevard meet three-car width standard required by the CG-rg Zoning code. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-7 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT prevent light spilling on to adjacent land uses and the Aviare Apartments to the east, separated from the project site by North De Anza Boulevard which is approximately 150 feet (six-lane) wide including the landscaped median. The proposed project would not include reflective glass and all exterior glass in the building would have a light reflectance value of more than 15 percent. Where glass features are considered, the proposed project would use non-reflective or “fritted glass” that is used specifically to reduce glare. For these reasons, and because the project proposes less development than what was evaluated in the General Plan EIR, impacts would remain consistent with the conclusions in the General Plan EIR and would be less than significant. II. AIR QUALITY Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?     b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project area is in non-attainment under applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard?     c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?     d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?     GENERAL PLAN EIR Chapter 4.2, Air Quality, of the General Plan EIR, addresses the air quality impacts associated with intensified development of the project site. Air quality impacts are found to be significant and unavoidable in the General Plan EIR and requires the City to implement General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures AQ-2a, AQ-2b and AQ-4b, which are project-specific mitigation measures that would reduce construction-related impacts and to ensure that mobile sources of toxic air contaminants (TACs) that are not covered under the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) permits are considered during subsequent project- level environmental review. While Chapter 4.2, Air Quality, of the General Plan EIR addresses the impacts associated with the development on the project site, the analysis was performed at a program level. This section analyzes the types and quantities of air pollutant emissions that would be generated by the construction and operation of the proposed project. An update to the background discussion on the air quality regulatory setting, meteorological conditions, existing ambient air quality in the vicinity of the project site, and air quality modeling is in Appendix A, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of this Initial Study. The health risk assessment (HRA) for this project is in Appendix B, Health Risk Assessment, of this Initial Study. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-8 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing commercial building (Goodyear Tire) generates criteria air pollutants from transportation sources, energy (natural gas and purchased energy), and area sources such as landscaping equipment and architectural coatings. Current land uses generate approximately 98 average daily trips.59 Existing emissions associated with the proposed project are shown in Table 4-1, below. TABLE 4-1 EXISTING CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS Category Criteria Air Pollutants (tons/year) ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5 Existing 2018 Emissions Area <1 <1 <1 <1 Energy <1 <1 <1 <1 Mobile <1 <1 <1 <1 Total <1 <1 <1 <1 Criteria Air Pollutants (lbs/day) ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5 Total <1 <1 <1 <1 Notes: Emissions may not total to 100 percent due to rounding. Source: California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), Version 2016.3.2.25. Air Pollutants of Concern Criteria Air Pollutants Pollutants emitted into the ambient air by stationary and mobile sources are regulated by federal and State law under the National and California Clean Air Act, respectively. Air pollutants are categorized as primary and/or secondary pollutants. Primary air pollutants are those that are emitted directly from sources. Carbon monoxide (CO), reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse inhalable particulate matter (PM10), fine inhalable particulate matter (PM2.5), and lead (Pb) are primary air pollutants. Of these, all of them except for ROGs are “criteria air pollutants,” which means that ambient air quality standards (AAQS) have been established for them. The National and California AAQS are the levels of air quality considered to provide a margin of safety in the protection of the public health and welfare. They are designed to protect those “sensitive receptors” most susceptible to further respiratory distress, such as asthmatics, the elderly, very young children, people already weakened by other disease or illness, and persons engaged in strenuous work or exercise. Healthy adults can tolerate 59 Transportation Impact Analysis, Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. May 16, 2019, Table 5, Project Trip Generation Estimates. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-9 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT occasional exposure to air pollutant concentrations considerably above these minimum standards before adverse effects are observed. Toxic Air Contaminants In addition to criteria air pollutants, both the State and federal government regulate emissions of TACs . The California Health and Safety Code defines a TAC as “an air pollutant which may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality or in serious illness, or which may pose a present or potential hazard to human health.” A substance that is listed as a hazardous air pollutant pursuant to Section 112(b) of the federal Clean Air Act (42 United States Code Section 7412[b]) is a toxic air contaminant. Under State law, the California Environmental Protection Agency, acting through the California Air Resources Board (CARB), is authorized to identify a substance as a TAC if it determines that the substance is an air pollutant that may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality or serious illness, or may pose a present or potential hazard to human health. Where available, the significance criteria established by the BAAQMD are relied upon to make the determinations discussed below. DISCUSSION a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? BAAQMD is directly responsible for reducing emissions from area, stationary, and mobile sources in the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB) to achieve National and California AAQS. In April of 2017 BAAQMD adopted its 2017 Clean Air Plan, which is a regional and multiagency effort to reduce air pollution in the SFBAAB. Regional growth projections are used by BAAQMD to forecast future emission levels in the SFBAAB. For the Bay Area, these regional growth projections are provided by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and transportation projections are provided by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and are partially based on land use designations in city/county general plans. Typically, only large, regionally significant projects have the potential to affect the regional growth projections. The proposed project would construct a 156-room hotel, which is within the 1,339-hotel- room maximum evaluated in the General Plan EIR and would not directly result in any new population growth or employment growth. The proposed project is not considered a regionally significant project under CEQA Guidelines Section 15206 that would affect regional vehicle miles traveled or VMT and warrant intergovernmental review by ABAG and MTC. As discussed in Section XII, Population and Housing, the proposed project would not exceed the level of population or housing projected in City or regional planning efforts (Plan Bay Area) through 2040, and it would not have the potential to substantially affect housing, employment, and population projections within the region, which is the basis of the 2017 Clean Air Plan projections. Furthermore, the net increase in regional emissions generated by the proposed project would be less than the BAAQMD’s emissions thresholds with mitigation (see criterion (b) below). These thresholds were established to identify projects that have the potential to generate a substantial amount of criteria air pollutants. Because the proposed THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-10 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT project would not exceed these thresholds, the proposed project would not be considered by the BAAQMD to be a substantial emitter of criteria air pollutants. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 2017 Clean Air Plan and impacts would be considered less than significant. b) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project area is in non-attainment under applicable federal or State ambient air quality standards? This section analyzes potential impacts related to air quality that could occur from a combination of the proposed project with other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects within the SFBAAB. The SFBAAB is currently designated a nonattainment area for California and National O3, California and National PM2.5, and California PM10 AAQS. Any project that produces a significant project-level regional air quality impact in an area that is in nonattainment adds to the cumulative impact. Due to the extent of the area potentially impacted from cumulative project emissions (the SFBAAB), a project is cumulatively significant when project-related emissions exceed the BAAQMD emissions thresholds. BAAQMD has identified thresholds of significance for criteria pollutant emissions and criteria air pollutant precursors, including ROG, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5. Development projects below the significance thresholds are not expected to generate sufficient criteria pollutant emissions to violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. The following describes changes in regional impacts from short-term construction activities and long-term operation of the proposed project. Construction Impacts Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources, such as on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, vehicles hauling materials to and from the site, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Site preparation activities produce fugitive dust emissions (PM10 and PM2.5) from demolition and soil-disturbing activities, such as grading and excavation. Air pollutant emissions from construction activities on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. Construction activities associated with the project would result in emissions of ROG, NOx, CO, PM10, and fine PM2.5. Construction Fugitive Dust Ground disturbing activities during construction would generate fugitive dust (PM10 and PM2.5). The amount of dust generated during construction would be highly variable and is dependent on the amount of material being disturbed, the type of material, moisture content, and meteorological conditions. If uncontrolled, PM10 and PM2.5 levels downwind of actively disturbed areas could possibly exceed State standards. BAAQMD considers all impacts related to fugitive dust emissions from construction to be less than significant with implementation of BAAQMD’s best management practices, which are shown in Mitigation Measure AQ-1. Impact AQ-1: Fugitive dust (PM10 and PM2.5) generated by the proposed project during construction could potentially result in significant regional short-term air quality impacts without implementation of the Bay THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-11 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Area Air Quality Management District’s best management practices related to reducing fugitive dust emissions. Mitigation Measure AQ-1: The project’s construction contractor shall comply with the following best management practices for reducing construction emissions of fugitive dust (PM10 and PM2.5) as required by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District Revised California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines:  Water all active construction areas at least twice daily, or as often as needed to control dust emissions. Watering should be sufficient to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency may be necessary whenever wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour. Reclaimed water should be used whenever possible.  Pave, apply water twice daily or as often as necessary to control dust, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites.  Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard (i.e., the minimum required space between the top of the load and the top of the trailer).  Sweep daily (with water sweepers using reclaimed water if possible) or as often as needed all paved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at the construction site to control dust.  Sweep public streets daily (with water sweepers using reclaimed water if possible) in the vicinity of the project site, or as often as needed, to keep streets free of visible soil material.  Hydroseed or apply non-toxic soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas.  Enclose, cover, water twice daily, or apply non-toxic soil binders to exposed stockpiles (dirt/sand).  Limit vehicle traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour.  Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as possible.  Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff from public roadways. Construction Exhaust Emissions The proposed project would result in demolition debris and would require soil export for the underground parking that would occur near existing sensitive land uses. Thus, the BAAQMD screening criteria for construction-related impacts would not be met. A quantified analysis of the proposed project’s construction emissions was conducted using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2016.3.2.25 based on information provided by the project applicant. The approximately 2-year construction period is assumed to begin in August 2020 and end in 2022. Potential construction-related air quality impacts are determined by comparing the average daily criteria air pollutants emissions generated by the proposed project-related construction activities to the BAAQMD significance thresholds in Table 4-2. Average daily emissions are based on the annual construction emissions divided by the total number of active construction days. As shown in Table 4-2, criteria air pollutant emissions from construction equipment exhaust would not exceed the BAAQMD average daily thresholds and impacts from project-related construction activities to the regional air quality would be less than significant. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-12 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT TABLE 4-2 CONSTRUCTION-RELATED CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS ESTIMATES Year Criteria Air Pollutants (tons/year)a VOC NOx Fugitive PM10b Exhaust PM10 Fugitive PM2.5b Exhaust PM2.5b 2020 <1 2 <1 <1 <1 <1 2021 <1 2 <1 <1 <1 <1 2022 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Total 1 4 <1 <1 <1 <1 Criteria Air Pollutants (average lbs/day)a Average Daily Emissionsc 5 17 1 <1 <1 <1 BAAQMD Average Daily Project- Level Threshold 54 54 BMPs 82 BMPs 54 Exceeds Average Daily Threshold No No N/A No N/A No Notes: Emissions may not total to 100 percent due to rounding. BMP = Best Management Practices; N/A = not applicable a. Construction phasing and equipment mix are based on the preliminary information provided by the project applicant. Where specific information regarding project-related construction activities was not available, construction assumptions were based on CalEEMod defaults, which are based on construction surveys conducted by South Coast Air Quality Management District of construction equipment and phasing for comparable projects. b. Includes implementation of BMPs for fugitive dust control required by BAAQMD as mitigation, including watering disturbed areas a minimum of two times per day, reducing speed limit to 15 miles per hour on unpaved surfaces, and street sweeping. c. Average daily emissions are based on the total construction emissions divided by the total number of active construction days. The total number of construction days is estimated to be about 425. Source: California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), Version 2016.3.2.25 Operational Impacts Long-term air pollutant emissions generated by a hotel development are typically associated with the burning of fossil fuels in vehicle trips to and from the hotel (mobile sources); energy use for cooling, heating, and cooking (energy); and landscape equipment use and household products (area sources). The primary source of long-term criteria air pollutant emissions generated by the project would be emissions produced from project-generated vehicle trips. The proposed project would generate a net total of 1,660 vehicle trips, an increase of 1,562 average daily weekday trips over the existing land uses at the site.60 Table 4-3 identifies the net increase in criteria air pollutant emissions associated with the proposed project compared to the baseline operation. 60 Transportation Impact Analysis, Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. May 16, 2019, Table 5, Project Trip Generation Estimates. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-13 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT TABLE 4-3 OPERATIONAL CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS ESTIMATES Category Criteria Air Pollutants (average lbs/day)a ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5 Existing 2022 Projected Emissions Area <1 <1 <1 <1 Energy <1 <1 <1 <1 On-Road Mobile <1 <1 <1 <1 Total <1 <1 <1 <1 Proposed Land Use 2022 Emissions Area 3 <1 <1 <1 Energy <1 2 <1 <1 On-Road Mobile 2 2 6 2 Total 5 3 6 2 Net Change in Emissions Area 3 <1 <1 <1 Energy <1 2 <1 <1 On-Road Mobile 2 2 6 2 Total 5 3 6 2 BAAQMD Average Daily Project-Level Threshold 54 54 82 54 Exceeds BAAQMD Threshold? No No No No Criteria Air Pollutants (tons/year) ROG NOx PM10 PM2.5 Net Change 1 1 1 <1 BAAQMD Annual Project-Level Threshold 10 10 15 10 Exceeds BAAQMD Threshold? No No No No Notes: Emissions may not total to 100 percent due to rounding. a Average daily emissions are based on the annual operational emissions divided by 365 days. Source: California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), Version 2016.3.2.25. As shown in Table 4-3, the net increase in operational emissions generated by the project would not exceed the BAAQMD daily or annual thresholds. Therefore, the proposed project would not cumulatively contribute to the nonattainment designations of the SFBAAB and impacts from project-related operation activities to the regional air quality would be less than significant. Summary As described, the proposed project would not have a significant long-term operational phase impact. However, also discussed above, without incorporation of fugitive dust control measures required by BAAQMD, construction activities associated with the proposed project could potentially result in THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-14 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT significant regional short-term air quality impacts. Mitigation Measure AQ-1 would ensure that required fugitive dust control measures are implemented to control project-related fugitive dust generated during construction activities. Therefore, the project’s contribution to cumulative air quality impacts would be less than significant with mitigation. c) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Development that would be accommodated by the proposed project could expose sensitive receptors to elevated pollutant concentrations. Unlike the construction emissions shown above in Table 4-2 under criterion (b), described in pounds per day (PPD), localized concentrations refer to an amount of pollutant in a volume of air (ppm or µg/m3) and can be correlated to potential health effects. Construction Off-Site Community Risk and Hazards The proposed project would elevate concentrations of TACs and PM2.5 in the vicinity of sensitive land uses during construction activities. The BAAQMD has developed Screening Tables for Air Toxics Evaluation During Construction (2017) that evaluate construction-related health risks associated with residential, commercial, and industrial projects. According to the screening tables, the residences are closer than the distance of 100 meters (328 feet) that would screen out potential health risks and, therefore, could be potentially impacted from the proposed construction activities. The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site are the residents at the Aviare Apartments, which is approximately 150 feet to the east of the project across North De Anza Boulevard. Consequently, a site- specific construction health risk assessment (HRA) of TACs and PM2.5 was prepared (see Appendix B of this Initial Study). A quantified analysis of the project’s construction emissions was conducted using the CalEEMod, Version 2016.3.2.25. Construction emissions were based on 425 working days of the total 2-year construction duration. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) AERMOD, Version 9.5, dispersion modeling program was used to estimate excess lifetime cancer risk, chronic non-cancer hazard index for non-carcinogenic risk, and the PM2.5 maximum annual concentrations at the nearest sensitive receptors. The results of the analysis are shown in Table 4-4. TABLE 4-4 CONSTRUCTION RISK SUMMARY – UNMITIGATED Receptor Cancer Risk (per million) Chronic Hazards PM2.5 (µg/m3)a Maximum Exposed Receptor – Offsite Residences 33.4 0.10 0.19 BAAQMD Threshold 10 1.0 0.30 Exceeds Threshold? Yes No No Note: Cancer risk calculated using 2015 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Health Risk Assessment Guidance Manual. Source: Lakes AERMOD View, 9.5 (2017). THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-15 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT The results of the HRA are based on the maximum receptor concentration over a 2-year construction exposure duration for off-site receptors, assuming 24-hour outdoor exposure.61 Risk is based on the updated Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) Guidance Manual:62  Cancer risk for the maximum exposed off-site resident from only construction activities related to the proposed project were calculated to be 33.4 in a million and would exceed the 10 in a million- significance threshold. Utilizing the latest 2015 OEHHA Guidance Manual, the calculated total cancer risk conservatively assumes that the risk for the MER consists of a pregnant woman in the third trimester that subsequently gives birth to an infant during the approximately 2-year construction period; therefore, all calculated risk values were multiplied by a factor of 10. In addition, it was conservatively assumed that the residents were outdoors 8 hours a day, 260 construction days per year and exposed to all of the daily construction emissions.  For non-carcinogenic effects, the chronic hazard index identified for each toxicological endpoint totaled less than one for all the off-site sensitive receptors. Therefore, chronic non-carcinogenic hazards are within acceptable limits.  The highest PM2.5 annual concentration of 0.19 is below the BAAQMD significance threshold of 0.3 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3). Because cancer risk for the maximum exposed receptor would exceed BAAQMD’s significance thresholds due to construction activities associated with the proposed project, the following mitigation measure is proposed. Impact AQ-2: The proposed project could expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations during construction. Mitigation Measure AQ-2: During construction, the construction contractor(s) shall:  Use construction equipment fitted with Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) for all equipment of 50 horsepower or more.  Prior to issuance of any construction permit, ensure that all construction plans submitted to the City of Cupertino Planning Department and/or Building Division clearly show the requirement for Level 3 DPF emissions standards for construction equipment over 50 horsepower.  Maintain a list of all operating equipment in use on the project site for verification by the City of Cupertino Building Division official or his/her designee. The construction equipment list shall state the makes, models, and number of construction equipment on-site.  Ensure that all equipment shall be properly serviced and maintained in accordance with manufacturer recommendations. 61 The 2015 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual identified that exposure duration has changed from 70 years to 30 years for operational risk to residents; however, the risk is still averaged over a 70-year lifetime. 62 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-16 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT  Communicate with all sub-contractors in contracts and construction documents that all nonessential idling of construction equipment is restricted to 5 minutes or less in compliance with California Air Resources Board Rule 2449 and is responsible for ensuring that this requirement is met. Mitigation Measure AQ-2 would reduce the project’s localized construction emissions, as shown in Table 4-5. The results indicate that, with mitigation, cancer risk would be less than the BAAQMD’s significance thresholds for residential-based receptors. Therefore, the project would not expose off-site sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of air pollutant emissions during construction and impacts would be less than significant with mitigation. TABLE 4-5 CONSTRUCTION RISK SUMMARY – MITIGATED Receptor Cancer Risk (per million) Chronic Hazards PM2.5 (µg/m3)a Maximum Exposed Receptor – Offsite Residences 5.1 0.015 0.03 BAAQMD Threshold 10 1.0 0.3 Exceeds Threshold? No No No Risks incorporate Mitigation Measure AQ-2, which includes using construction equipment with Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters for equipment over 50 horsepower. Note: Cancer risk calculated using 2015 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Health Risk Assessment guidance. Operation Phase Community Risk and Hazards Types of land uses that typically generate substantial quantities of criteria air pollutants and TACs include industrial (stationary sources), manufacturing, and warehousing (truck idling) land uses. These types of major air pollutant emissions sources are not included as part of the proposed hotel project. Thus, implementation of the proposed project would not result in creation of land uses that would generate substantial concentrations of TACs. Development of the proposed hotel may result in stationary sources of TACs emissions from the restaurant’s use of charbroilers, or emergency generators and boilers. However, these sources are not considered to be large emitters. Examples of projects which generate substantial TAC emissions are distribution centers with more than 100 trucks per day or 40 trucks with transport refrigeration units (TRUs) per day, refineries, chrome platers, dry cleaners, gasoline dispensing facilities, and railyards.63 Possible stationary sources associated with hotels would require permits from BAAQMD to limit TAC emissions (e.g., diesel-fueled emergency generators over 50 horsepower, water boilers with natural gas combustion). The permitting process ensures that stationary source emissions would be below the BAAQMD significance thresholds of 10 in a million-cancer risk and 1 for acute risk at the maximally exposed individual. Additionally, hotel-related truck deliveries would be less than CARB’s recommended 63 California Air Resources Board (CARB), 2005. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-17 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT advisory criteria for distribution centers (100 trucks per day). Therefore, overall, impacts related to TACs are considered less than significant. CO Hotspot Analysis Areas of vehicle congestion have the potential to create pockets of carbon monoxide (CO) called hotspots. These pockets have the potential to exceed the State 1-hour standard of 20 parts per million (ppm) or the 8-hour standard of 9 ppm. The proposed project would not conflict with the VTA’s Congestion Management Program (CMP) because it would not hinder the capital improvements outlined in the CMP or alter regional travel patterns. VTA ’s CMP must be consistent with Plan Bay Area 2040. An overarching goal of the regional Plan Bay Area 2040 is to concentrate development in areas where there are existing services and infrastructure rather than allocate new growth in outlying areas where substantial transportation investments would be necessary to achieve the per capita passenger vehicle, vehicle miles traveled, and associated GHG emissions reductions. The proposed project is an infill hotel development that is in close proximity to existing employment centers, roadways, transit, and bicycle and pedestrian routes (see Section XV, Transportation, below), and for these reasons would be consistent with the overall goals of the Plan Bay Area 2040. Furthermore, implementation of the proposed project would result in the generation of 84 AM (morning) peak hour trips on a weekday 64 and would not increase traffic volumes at affected intersections by more than 44,000 vehicles per hour or 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal mixing is substantially limited. Therefore, impacts associated with CO hotspots would be less than significant. d) Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Construction and operation of hotel developments would not generate odors that would affect a substantial number of people. The type of facilities that are considered to have objectionable odors include wastewater treatments plants, compost facilities, landfills, solid waste transfer stations, fiberglass manufacturing facilities, paint/coating operations (e.g., auto body shops), dairy farms, petroleum refineries, asphalt batch plants, chemical manufacturing, and food manufacturing facilities. Hotel uses are not associated with foul odors that constitute a public nuisance. During operation, the on-site restaurant could generate odors from cooking. Odors from cooking are not substantial enough to be considered nuisance odors that would affect a substantial number of people. Furthermore, nuisance odors are regulated under BAAQMD Regulation 7, Odorous Substances, which requires abatement of any nuisance generating an odor complaint. BAAQMD’s Regulation 7, Odorous Substances, places general limitations on odorous substances and specific emission limitations on certain 64 Transportation Impact Analysis, Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. May 16, 2019, Table 5, Project Trip Generation Estimates. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-18 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT odorous compounds.65 For restaurants and commercial kitchens, the City generally requires installation of charcoal activated filtration systems as a condition of approval to further control odors. Odors are also regulated under BAAQMD Regulation 1, Rule 1-301, Public Nuisance, which states that “no person shall discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or the public; or which endangers the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which causes, or has a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.” During construction activities, construction equipment exhaust and application of asphalt and architectural coatings would temporarily generate odors. Any construction-related odor emissions would be temporary and intermittent. Additionally, odors would typically be confined to the immediate vicinity of the construction equipment. By the time such emissions reach any sensitive receptor sites, they would be diluted to well below any level of air quality concern. In summary, because construction-related odor emissions would be temporary and intermittent, hotel developments are not considered the type of use that would generate odors that would affect a substantial number of people and the proposed project is required to comply with BAAQMD Regulation 7, odor-related impacts to off-site land uses would be less than significant. III. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on a plant or animal population, or essential habitat, defined as a candidate, sensitive or special- status species?     b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community type?     c) Have a substantial adverse effect on State or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?     d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, their wildlife corridors or nursery sites?     e) Conflict with any local ordinances or policies protecting biological resources?     65 It should be noted that while restaurants can generate odors, these sources are not identified by BAAQMD as nuisance odors because they typically do not generate significant odors that affect a substantial number of people. Larger restaurants that employ five or more people are subject to BAAQMD Regulation 7, Odorous Substances. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-19 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact f) Conflict with an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan?     GENERAL PLAN EIR Chapter 4.3, Biological Resources, of the General Plan EIR, addresses the impacts to biological resources associated with intensified development of the project site. Impacts to biological resources are found to be less than significant and less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures to ensure impacts to birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) would not be significant. The project is required to comply with the General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure BIO-1 to ensure the protection of nesting raptors and other birds when in active use, as required by the federal MBTA and the California of Fish and Game Code (CFG Code). EXISTING CONDITIONS As previously described, the project site contains an existing and occupied Goodyear Tire, which provides new tires, tire repairs, oil changes, and other automotive care services, and associated surface parking lot. The site contains ornamental landscaping for the existing and surrounding commercial spaces, including 11 trees, of which six are located along North De Anza Boulevard. The existing trees range in height from 20 to 50 feet. There are no buildings immediately adjacent to the site. Surrounding uses include the one- story (30 feet tall) buildings in the Homestead Square shopping center to the north and west, the three- story (approximately 45 feet) Aviare Apartments to the east, and the four-story (approximately 45 feet) Cupertino Hotel to the south. The project site and surrounding area has been urbanized and now contains roadways, structures, other impervious surfaces, areas of turf, and ornamental landscaping. Remnant native trees are scattered throughout the urbanized area, together with non-native trees, shrubs, and groundcovers. As previously described in Chapter 3, Project Description, the CALVEG 66 habitat mapping program, classifies the site as an “urban area” that tends to have low to poor wildlife habitat value due to replacement of natural communities, fragmentation of remaining open space areas and parks, and intensive human disturbance. The diversity of urban wildlife depends on the extent and type of landscaping and remaining open space, as well as the proximity to natural habitat. Trees and shrubs used for landscaping provide nest sites and cover for wildlife adapted to developed areas. Typic al native bird species include the mourning dove, 66 The CALVEG system was initiated in January 1978 by the Region 5 Ecology Group of the US Forest Service to classify California’s existing vegetation communities for use in Statewide resource planning. CALVEG maps use a hierarchical classification on the following categories: forest; woodland; chaparral; shrubs; and herbaceous. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-20 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT scrub jay, northern mockingbird, American robin, brown towhee, American crow, and Anna’s hummingbird, among others. Introduced species include the rock dove, European starling, house finch, and house sparrow. Urban areas can also provide habitat for several species of native mammals such as the California ground squirrel and striped skunk, as well as the introduced eastern fox squirrel and eastern red fox. Introduced pest species such as the Norway rat, house mouse, and opossum are also abundant in developed areas. Wetlands and jurisdictional waters within the city boundary include creek corridors and associated riparian scrub and woodland, and areas of freshwater marsh around ponds, seeps, springs, and other waterbodies. Some remnant stands of riparian scrub and woodland occur along segments of the numerous creeks through the urbanized valley floor. The project site does not encompass these creek corridors or contain other regulated waters. The project site is not near or adjacent to any natural areas. There is no existing wildlife movement corridor designation on the site by any agency, including the United States Fish and Wildlife or the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) has no record of special-status plant or animal species on the project site or urbanized areas within a 1-mile area surrounding the project site. There are no natural lands within a 1-mile area of the project site. There is a possibility that birds could nest in trees and other landscaping on the project site. The nests of most bird species are protected under the MBTA when in active use and there is a remote possibility that one or more raptor species protected under the MBTA and CFG Code, could nest on the project site. These include both the Cooper’s hawk (Accipiter cooperi) and white-tailed kite (Elanus leuocurus), which have reported CNDDB occurrences within the city boundary, together with more common raptors such as red-tailed hawk, great horned owl, and American kestrel, all of which are protected by the MBTA and CFG Code when their nests are in active use. However, no essential habitat for these or other special-status species is present on the site due to its developed condition. Numerous bat species are known to be in the Cupertino area, most of which are relatively common and are not considered special-status species. As previously stated, the CNDDB does not show any occurrences of special-status bats within the site vicinity or anywhere in Cupertino but does show records within several miles of Cupertino. The records include occurrences of Townsend’s big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii), hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus), and Yu ma myotis (Myotis yumanensis). These three species have no legal protected status under the State or federal Endangered Species Acts, but Townsend’s big-eared bat is considered a Species of Special Concern by the CDFW. These species have various priority rankings with the Western Bat Working Group (WBWG), ranging from “High” for Townsend’s big-eared bat, “Medium” for hoary bat, to “Low-Medium” for Yuma myotis. Bat species found in the Cupertino vicinity may forage and occasionally roost in the site vicinity, but because the Goodyear Tire is occupied no suitable habitat for maternity roosts are on the site. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-21 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT According to the Vegetation Map shown in the Environmental Resources and Sustainability Element of the General Plan most of the City, including the project site, is within the urban forest.67 The City recognizes that every tree on both public and private property is an important part of Cupertino's urban forest and contributes significant economic, environmental and aesthetic benefits of the community.68 All 11 existing trees will remain on the project site as part of the proposed project. The existing tree species are not native to California, nor indigenous to the project site. Since the existing development is on property that requires a development application, all existing trees on the site are considered protected.69 DISCUSSION a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on a plant or animal population, or essential habitat, defined as a candidate, sensitive or special-status species? Nesting Birds As stated above in the existing conditions discussion, there are no known occurrences of special-status plant or animal species and no suitable habitat for such species on the project site, but there is a possibility that birds that are protected by the MBTA and CFG Code could nest in trees and other landscaping on the project site. However, no essential habitat for these or other special-status species is present on the site due to its developed condition. The analysis in the General Plan EIR found that impacts to special-status species, including nesting birds, would be reduced to less than significant with mitigation. Accordingly, the implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would also be required for the project to reduce impacts to a less-than-significant level. Impact BIO-1: The proposed project could have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on a plant or animal population, or essential habitat, defined as a candidate, sensitive or special-status species. Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Nests of raptors and other birds shall be protected when in active use, as required by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the California Fish and Game Code. If construction activities and any required tree removal are proposed to occur during the breeding season (February 1 and August 31), the construction contractor shall indicate, on all construction plans, that preconstruction surveys shall: 67 City of Cupertino General Plan (Community Vision 2015-2040), Chapter 6, Environmental Resources and Sustainability Element, Figure ES-1. 68 City of Cupertino, Tree Protection and Tree Removal link on the City’s website, Accessed May 6, 2019 at https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/community-development/planning/residential-development/tree-protection- tree-removal. 69 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 14, Streets, Sidewalks and Landscaping, Chapter 14.18, Protected Trees. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-22 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT  Be conducted by a qualified biologist prior to tree removal or grading, demolition, or construction activities. Note that preconstruction surveys are not required for tree removal or construction, grading, or demolition activities outside the nesting period.  Be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the start of tree removal or construction.  Be repeated at 14-day intervals until construction has been initiated in the area after which surveys can be stopped.  Document locations of active nests containing viable eggs or young birds. Protective measures for active nests containing viable eggs or young birds shall be implemented under the direction of the qualified biologist until the nests no longer contain eggs or young birds. Protective measures shall include:  Establishment of clearly delineated exclusion zones (i.e., demarcated by identifiable fencing, such as orange construction fencing or equivalent) around each nest location as determined by the qualified biologist, taking into account the species of birds nesting, their tolerance for disturbance and proximity to existing development. In general, exclusion zones shall be a minimum of 300 feet for raptors and 75 feet for passerines and other birds.  Monitoring active nests within an exclusion zone on a weekly basis throughout the nesting season to identify signs of disturbance and confirm nesting status.  An increase in the radius of an exclusion zone by the qualified biologist if project activities are determined to be adversely affecting the nesting birds. Exclusion zones may be reduced by the qualified biologist only in consultation with California Department of Fish and Wildlife.  The protection measures shall remain in effect until the young have left the nest and are foraging independently or the nest is no longer active. Bird Collision Avian injury and mortality resulting from collisions with buildings, towers and other man-made structures is a common occurrence in city and suburban settings. Some birds are unable to detect and avoid glass and have difficulty distinguishing between actual objects and their reflected images, particularly when the glass is transparent and views through the structure are possible. Night-time lighting can interfere with movement patters of some night-migrating birds, causing disorientation or attracting them to the light source. The frequency of bird collisions in a particular area is dependent on numerous factors, including: characteristics of building height, fenestration (the arrangement of windows and doors on the elevations of a building) and exterior treatments of windows and their relationship to other buildings and vegetation in the area; local and migratory avian populations, their movement patterns, and proximity of water, food and other attractants, time of year; prevailing winds; weather conditions; and other variables. The proposed hotel would alter the physical characteristics of the site; however, this change is not expected to contribute to a substantial increase in the risk of collisions to local and migratory birds. This is due to several reasons, including the fact that the surrounding area is already intensively developed with structures ranging in height from approximately 18 feet to 45 feet with similar bulk and surface treatment; and the proposed building materials would have a light reflectance value of more than 15 percent, and THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-23 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT the proposed lighting is low-level illumination with no up-lighting on the building exterior. The railings located on the second-floor balconies and roof top lounge would also incorporate UV coating, frosting, and fritting to make them visible to birds and reduce bird collisions. Because the site vicinity is already intensively developed with urban use and the site is currently developed with an occupied structure, most birds, as under existing conditions, would likely acclimate to the presence of the new building once completed. The potential risk of bird collision with the new building would be a less-than-significant impact. While the exterior treatment of the proposed new hotel is in the conceptual phase and has not yet been finalized, and must still go through Design Review, there are design options to minimize the risk of bird collisions through the use of well-documented bird-safe designs for window treatments, roof top equipment, and night-time lighting. While any bird collisions that do occur should not have a substantial adverse effect on special-status bird species or more common bird species that may be flying through the vicinity, the applicant has committed to implementing bird-safe design measures in the new building, which would further address the low risk of collision. These include the following measures that would be part of the design of the new building:  Non-Reflective Glass: No reflective glass would be used in the building consistent with the San Francisco Bird Safe Recommendations 70 that state that reflective glass should be avoided, because some birds in certain circumstances might see vegetation in the reflection and fly into a building. None of the exterior glass in the building will have a light reflectance value of more than 15 percent.  Fritted Glass: Fritted glass is a non-reflective glass that is used to reduce glare and lower the danger to birds. Using fritted glass on the upper floor windows of the new building (4th through 6th floors) would help prevent possible bird strikes. Fritting helps diminish the transparency of glass and is a documented approach to helping reduce the probability of bird collisions. Transparent glass used in “design traps” such as glass bridges or parapets can also be problematic. The project proposes glass railing elements on the second-floor balconies and roof top lounge, which would incorporate UV coatings, frosting, and fritting to make them visible to birds to reduce collisions.  Building Lighting: Overly lit buildings can be problematic, especially if there is up-lighting. The project is required to meet City code minimum standards on exterior lighting, and the new building would have no up-lighting. The source, intensity, and type of exterior lighting for the project site would generally be provided for the purpose of orienting site users and for safety needs. All on-site lighting would be low-level illumination and shielded to reduce light spill or glare.  Tree Screening on Lower Floors (1st through 3rd): The proposed project includes 14 new trees on the perimeter of the building in addition to the 11 mature trees that would remain. These trees would help shield lower floors, which shielding would increase as the new trees grow over time. 70 San Francisco Planning Department, 2011. Standards for Bird-Safe Buildings, San Francisco, California. Adopted July 14; THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-24 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT  Reduced Unnecessary Interior Lights: Energy conservation measures, such as employing automatic sensors to turn off lights when guests are not present in guest rooms, would be used as part of interior lighting for the new building. The location of the project site, the building design features and selected materials, were determined to adequately address the remote potential for special-status bird species dispersing through the site vicinity to collide with the new structure and be injured or killed. These measures would serve to minimize the potential for bird strikes through the use of bird-friendly design guidelines in the treatment of windows and other aspects of the proposed hotel building, and would ensure any potential impact would be less than significant for special-status birds and more common bird species. Roosting Bats b) As described in the existing conditions, the CNDDB records were recently searched for, among other species, occurrences of Townsend’s big-eared bat (Corynorhinus townsendii), hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus), and Yuma myotis bat (Myotis yumanensis). These three species have no legal protected status under the State or federal Endangered Species Acts, but Townsend’s big-eared bat is considered a Species of Special Concern by the CDFW. Bat species found in the Cupertino vicinity may forage and occasionally roost in the site vicinity, but suitable habitat conditions for maternity roots is absent from the site. The potential for any special-status bat species to be present on the site is considered highly remote, given the urbanization of the site vicinity and intensity of human activity, which typically discourages possible occupation by special-status bats. Accordingly, the construction and operation of the proposed project would not result in the inadvertent loss of any bats and impacts would be less than significant. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community type? As discussed in the existing conditions above and determined in the General Plan EIR, development of the proposed project would occur in an urbanized area where no sensitive natural communities are found; therefore, no impact would occur, and no mitigation measures would be required. c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? As discussed in the existing conditions above and determined in the General Plan EIR, development of the proposed project would occur in an urbanized area and there are no wetlands or jurisdictional waters on or near the project site; therefore, no impact would occur directly. Indirect impacts to wetlands and jurisdictional other waters include: 1) an increase in the potential for sedimentation due to construction grading and ground disturbance, 2) an increase in the potential for erosion due to increased runoff volumes generated by impervious surfaces, and 3) an increase in the potential for water quality degradation due to increased levels in non-point pollutants. However, indirect THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-25 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT impacts would be largely avoided through effective implementation of best management practices during construction and compliance with water quality controls. As discussed below in Section IX, Hydrology and Water Q uality, of this Initial Study, water quality in stormwater runoff is regulated locally by the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program, which implements Provision C.3 of the Municipal Regional Storm Water National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit (MRP) adopted by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). Adherence to these permit conditions requires the project to incorporate treatment measures, an agreement to maintain them, and other appropriate source control and site design features that reduce pollutants in runoff to the maximum extent practicable. Many of the requirements involve low impact development practices such as the use of on-site infiltration that reduce pollutant loading. Incorporation of these measures can even improve on existing conditions. In addition, future development would be required to comply with the Municipal Regional NPDES Permit (CMC Chapter 9.18, Storm Water Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection) and implement a construction Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that require the incorporation of best management practices to control sedimentation, erosion, and hazardous materials contamination of runoff during construction. The indirect water quality-related issues are discussed further in Section IX, Hydrology and Water Quality, of this Initial Study. As discussed in Impact HYDRO-1, water quality impacts would be less than significant. Accordingly, indirect impacts to wetlands and jurisdictional waters would be less than significant and no mitigation measures would be required. d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, their wildlife corridors or nursery sites? Development on the project site would occur in an urbanized area where sensitive wildlife resources and important wildlife movement corridors are no longer present because of the existing development. Wildlife species common to urban and suburban habitat could be displaced where existing structures are demolished and landscaping is removed as part of future development, but these species are relatively abundant, and adapted to human disturbance. As discussed in Chapter 3, Project Description, of this Initial Study, the proposed project would retain the 11 existing trees that border the project site and would also include landscaping that would provide replacement habitat for wildlife species that may have adapted to the project site. Therefore, project impacts on the movement of fish and wildlife, wildlife corridors, or wildlife nursery sites would be considered less than significant, and no mitigation measures would be required. e) Would the project conflict with any local ordinances or policies protecting biological resources? As discussed in criteria (a) through (d), above, development of the project site would occur in an urbanized area where sensitive biological and wetland resources are considered to be absent, and no major conflicts with the relevant policies or ordinances related to biological resources in the General Plan and/or CMC would occur. No trees are proposed to be removed as part of the project. However, because the existing development is on property that requires a development application, all existing trees on the THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-26 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT site are considered protected.71 Therefore, if trees were to be removed, compliance with the City’s Tree Ordinances (CMC Chapter 14.12 and Chapter 14.18), which requires replacement trees, would ensure impacts related to the removal of trees would be less than significant. f) Would the project conflict with an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? No adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved conservation plan includes the city or the project site, and the proposed project would not conflict with any adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved conservation plan. No impact would occur, and no mitigation measures would be required. IV. CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?     b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?     c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries?     GENERAL PLAN EIR Chapter 4.4, Cultural Resources, of the General Plan EIR, addresses the impacts to cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) associated with intensified development of the project site and impacts are less than significant. The following is a summary of Section, 4.4.1.2, Existing Conditions, of Chapter 4.4, which is based on the cultural resource analysis conducted by Tom Origer & Associates on July 24, 2013, included as Appendix D, Cultural Resources Data, of the General Plan EIR. The cultural resources study consists of archival research at the Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University, examination of the library and files, field inspection, and contact with the Native American community. As shown in Table 4.4-2, Cultural Resources in the Project Study Area and Vicinity, and on Figure 4.4-1, Cultural Resources, of the General Plan EIR, there are no identified cultural resources on the project site. 71 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 14, Streets, Sidewalks and Landscaping, Chapter 14.18, Protected Trees. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-27 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT EXISTING CONDITIONS As shown in Table 4.4-2, Cultural Resources in the Project Study Area and Vicinity, and on Figure 4.4-1, Cultural Resources, of the General Plan EIR, there are no identified cultural resources on the project site. The project site was developed in 1971 and 1972, which is within the 45-year age limit established by the State Office of Historic Preservation (OHP) for buildings that may be of historical value.72 However, the existing building is not associated with significant cultural events or persons in California’s past and does not have any distinctive historical characteristics, and as such does not have any qualifying historical value. DISCUSSION a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? Under CEQA, both prehistoric and historic-period archaeological sites may qualify as historical resources.73 Archaeological resources are addressed in criterion (b), and human remains are addressed below in criterion (c), below. The project site currently has a commercial building developed in 1971 and 1972. As described in the existing conditions above, the existing building does not meet the criteria for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources. Additionally, the General Plan EIR did not identify the project site or existing building as a historic resource, and the existing building is not currently listed as a California Historical Resource.74 Accordingly, less-than-significant impacts to historical architectural resources would occur as a result of project development and no mitigation measures would be required. b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? Subsurface historical and pre-contact archaeological deposits that meet the definition of historical resource under CEQA Section 21084.1 or CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 could be present at the project site and could be damaged or destroyed by ground-disturbing construction activities (e.g., site preparation, grading, excavation, and trenching for utilities) associated with development allowed under the proposed project. Should this occur, the ability of the deposits to convey their significance, either as containing information about prehistory or history, or as possessing traditional or cultural significance to Native American or other descendant communities, would be materially impaired. 72 Public Resources Code Section 5024.1 73 California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15064.5(c), Determining the Significance of Impacts on Historical and Unique Archeological Resources. 74 Office of Historic Preservation, Listed California Historical Resources, http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/ListedResources/?view=county&criteria=43, accessed July 23, 2018. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-28 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT While the project site is developed and the cultural resources study prepared for the General Plan EIR did not identify any known archaeological deposits on the project site, the site could still contain subsurface archaeological deposits, including unrecorded Native American prehistoric archaeological materials. Therefore, any project-related ground-disturbing activities have the potential to affect subsurface prehistoric archaeological resources that may be present. Implementation of Mitigation Measure CULT-1 would reduce impacts to unknown archaeological deposits to a less-than-significant level. Impact CULT-1: The proposed project could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. Mitigation Measure CULT-1: If any prehistoric or historic subsurface cultural resources are discovered during ground-disturbing (including grading, demolition and/or construction) activities:  All work within 50 feet of the resources shall be halted, the City shall be notified, and a qualified archaeologist shall be consulted. The contractor shall cooperate in the recovery of the materials. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for tribal cultural resources, historical resources or unique archaeological resources is being carried out.  The qualified archaeologist shall prepare a report for the evaluation of the resource to the California Register of Historical Places and the City Building Department. The report shall also include appropriate recommendations regarding the significance of the find and appropriate mitigations as follows: • If the resource is a non-tribal resource, the archaeologist shall assess the significance of the find according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. • If the resource is a tribal resource – whether historic or prehistoric – the consulting archaeologist shall consult with the appropriate tribe(s) to evaluate the significance of the resource and to recommend appropriate and feasible avoidance, testing, preservation or mitigation measures, in light of factors such as the significance of the find, proposed project design, costs, and other considerations. If avoidance is infeasible, other appropriate measures (e.g., data recovery) may be implemented.  All significant non-tribal cultural materials recovered shall be, as necessary, and at the discretion of the consulting archaeologist, subject to scientific analysis, professional museum curation, and documentation according to current professional standards. c) Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? There are no known human remains on the project site; however, the potential to unearth unknown remains during ground disturbing activities associated with the construction of the project could occur. Any human remains encountered during ground-disturbing activities associated with the proposed project would be subject to federal, State, and local regulations to ensure no adverse impacts to human remains would occur in the unlikely event human remains are found. Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and the CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e) contain the mandated procedures of conduct following the discovery of human remains. According to the provisions THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-29 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT in CEQA, if human remains are encountered at the site, all work in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall cease and necessary steps to ensure the integrity of the immediate area shall be taken. The Santa Clara County Coroner shall be notified immediately. The Coroner shall then determine whether the remains are Native American. If the Coroner determines the remains are Native American, the Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours, which would, in turn, notify the person the NAHC identifies as the Most Likely Descendants (MLD) of any human remains. Further actions shall be determined, in part, by the MLD. The MLD has 48 hours to make recommendations regarding the disposition of the remains following allowed access to the project site. If the MLD does not make recommendations within 48 hours, the owner shall, with appropriate dignity, reinter the remains in an area of the property secure from further disturbance. Alternatively, if the owner does not accept the MLD’s recommendations, the owner or the MLD may request mediation by the NAHC. Therefore, with the mandatory regulatory procedures described above, potential impacts related to the potential discovery or disturbance of any human remains accidently unearthed during construction activities associated with the proposed project would be less than significant. V. ENERGY Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation?     b) Conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?     GENERAL PLAN EIR Chapter 4.14, Utilities and Services Systems, of the General Plan EIR, includes an analysis of impacts related to energy. Impacts were found to be less than significant. EXISTING CONDITIONS The project site is located in the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority City Cores, Corridors & Station Areas PDA, which, amongst other uses, are areas designated for energy-efficient infill development with existing infrastructure that is in close proximity to existing employment centers, roadways, transit, and bicycle and pedestrian routes. Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) supplies electricity and natural gas to much of northern and central California – from Humboldt and Shasta counties in the north to Kern and Santa Barbara counties in the south – including the infrastructure for the City of Cupertino. Total electricity consumption in PG&E’s THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-30 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT service area is forecast to increase from 104,868 gigawatt-hours (GWh) in 2015 to 119,633 GWh in 2027.75 The current project site is served by both electricity and natural gas connections. Electricity is supplied to the project site via infrastructure maintained by Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E). Silicon Valley Clean Energy (SVCE), a locally controlled public agency that has a partnership with PG&E, supplies the electricity to the project site. SVCE provides a standard 50 percent renewable energy portfolio, in addition to a 100 percent renewable option that electricity customers can opt into. Natural gas and associated infrastructure are provided and maintained by PG&E. The current on-site utilities include a natural gas heating system and electric cooling system.76 Current energy demands come from the operation of the 8,323 square-foot building that is one story (approximately 18 feet) tall and built in 1971 and 1972.77 The existing building is currently occupied with a Goodyear Tire, which provides new tires, tire repairs, oil changes, and other automotive care services and provides about 10 jobs.78 According to the transportation analysis prepared for the project, the current site generates about 98 average daily trips.79 DISCUSSION a) Would the project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? The proposed project would demolish the existing commercial building and replace it with a new building. Construction activities use energy from various sources, such as on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, vehicles hauling materials to and from the site, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. The operation of the proposed hotel would use energy for cooling, heating, cooking, and use of landscape equipment, and for vehicle trips to and from the hotel. The proposed project would generate a net total of 1,660 vehicle trips, an increase of 1,562 average daily weekday trips over the existing land uses at the site.80 The proposed project is an infill development project that would result in an increase in land use intensity in a portion of the city. The project site currently has access to existing infrastructure and services, and 75 California Energy Commission (CEC). 2017. California Energy Demand Updated Forecast, 2017-2027. https://efiling.energy.ca.gov/getdocument.aspx?tn=214635, accessed on June 11, 2019. 76 AEI Consultants, 2018, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California. August 8, 2018. 77 AEI Consultants, 2018, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California. August 8, 2018. 78 Personal communication between PlaceWorks and Goodyear Auto Service Center on January 9, 2019. 79 Transportation Impact Analysis, Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. May 16, 2019, Table 5, Project Trip Generation Estimates. 80 Transportation Impact Analysis, Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. May 16, 2019, Table 5, Project Trip Generation Estimates. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-31 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT therefore would not result in new energy use associated with the construction or installation of new transmission infrastructure for electricity, natural gas, water, wastewater, and storm water. The proposed project would connect to the existing infrastructure systems and would not require new off-site energy supply facilities or capacity enhancing alterations to existing facilities. The project provides connectivity to existing transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities, and locates a hotel development in close proximity to existing hotel-serving land uses and employment centers. As described in Section X, Land Use and Planning, the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation as well as the Zoning District and would not result in new growth potential from what was considered in the General Plan EIR. The proposed hotel would meet the 2019 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards of the California Public Resources Code, Title 24, Part 6 that will take effect on January 1, 2020 and apply to any project that is proposed to begin construction on or after August 2020. The 2019 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards improve upon the 2016 Standards and require 30 percent more energy-efficiency for non- residential buildings.81 As described above in Section 3.1.4.2, Zoning, the City enforces the CalGreen Building Standards, which established planning and design standards for sustainable site development, energy efficiency (in excess of the California Energy Code requirements), in CMC Chapter 16.58, Green Building Standards Code Adopted. CMC Chapter 16.58, Section 16.58.220, Table 101.10 requires that non- residential new construction exceeding 50,000 square feet shall achieve a minimum green building requirement of Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Silver or an alternate green building standard that is as stringent as LEED or other cited standards and is subject to third party verification. Energy conserving features of the proposed project would include new landscaping that is native and/or adaptive, and drought resistant to conserve water and subsequently energy. Additionally, the proposed project would install solar panels on the roof level, and Mitigation Measure GHG-1, in Section VII, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, below, requires that the proposed photovoltaic generation system (commonly referred to as a PV system or solar panels) to offset potential building electricity use. While this measure is aimed at reducing GHG emissions, it also ensures energy efficiency. New buildings constructed in PDAs and to the standards identified above would not result in wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources. Accordingly, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures would be required. b) Would the project conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? As discussed below in criterion (b) of Section VII, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, the proposed project would not conflict with the CARB 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, Plan Bay Area, or the Cupertino Climate 81 California Energy Commission’s website https://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2019standards/index.html, accessed on January 6, 2019. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-32 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Action Plan (CAP), both of which involve planning for us of renewable energy planning and energy efficiency standards. Also, as previously discussed, the project would build to the most current 2019 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards of the California Public Resources Code, Title 24, Part 6. Accordingly, impacts would be less than significant. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?     ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?     iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?     iv) Landslides, mudslides or other similar hazards?     b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?     c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse?     d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined by Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994),creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property?     e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?     f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?     GENERAL PLAN EIR Chapter 4.5, Geology, Soils, and Seismicity, of the General Plan EIR, addresses the impacts to geological and seismic-related impacts associated with intensified development of the project site. The following discussion is based on project site information available in Section 4.5.1.2, Existing Conditions, of Chapter 4.5. EXISTING CONDITIONS The following describes the existing conditions on the project site with respect to geology and soils: THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-33 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT  Geology. The City of Cupertino lies in the west-central part of the Santa Clara Valley, a broad, mostly flat alluvial plain that extends southward from San Francisco Bay. The site is generally flat with an average elevation of 213 feet above mean sea level and the depth of groundwater is estimated to be 125 feet below ground surface or deeper.  Soils. The soil is Urban Land Flaskan Complex, which is a well-drained sandy loam, sandy clay loam, gravelly sandy clay loam and very gravelly sandy clay loam soil with a depth of 59 inches.82 Surficial geology is young, unconsolidated Quaternary alluvium,83 which is described as Holocene-age younger alluvium and coarse-grained alluvium that are composed of unconsolidated, poorly sorted gravel, silt, sand, and clay and organic matter.  Fault Rupture. The San Francisco Bay Area is one of the most seismically active regions in the United States. The significant earthquakes that occur in the Bay Area are generally associated with crustal movement along well-defined active fault zones such as the San Andreas Fault system. Many of these zones exhibit a regional trend to the northwest. The site is not located within a State-designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (known formerly as a Special Studies Zone) or a Santa Clara County-designated Fault Rupture Hazard Zone.84 No active fault traces are known to cross the site.  Liquefaction. The site is not located within a seismically inducted liquefaction hazard zone, as mapped by the State of California and Santa Clara County.85 During cyclic ground shaking, such as seismic shaking during an earthquake, cyclically-induced stresses may cause increased pore water pressures within the soil matrix, resulting in liquefaction. Liquefied soil may lose shear strength that may lead to large shear deformations and/or flow failure. Liquefied soil can also settle as pore pressures dissipate following an earthquake. Soils most susceptible to liquefaction are loose to moderately dense, saturated, non-cohesive soils with poor drainage, such as sands and silts with interbedded or capping layers of relatively low permeability soil.  Lateral Spreading. Lateral spreading typically occurs as a form of horizontal displacement of relatively flat-lying alluvial material toward an open or “free” face such as an open body of water, channel, or excavation. In soils, this movement is generally due to failure along a weak plane and may often be associated with liquefaction. As cracks develop within the weakened material, blocks of soil are displaced laterally toward the open face. Cracking and lateral movement may gradually propagate away from the face as blocks continue to break free. Because of the low potential for liquefaction, the risk of lateral spreading at the site is also considered low. 82 AEI Consultants, 2018, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California. August 8, 2018. 83 US Geological Survey, 1994, Preliminary Quaternary Geologic Maps of Santa Clara Valley, Santa Clara, Alameda, and San Mateo Counties, California: A Digital Database, Open-File Report 94-231, by E.J. Helley, R.W. Graymer, G.A. Phelps, P.K. Showalter, and C.M. Wentworth. 84 Santa Clara County, 2012. Santa Clara County Geologic Hazard Zones, Map 18, updated October 26, 2012. 85 http://gmw.conservation.ca.gov/SHP/EZRIM/Reports/SHZR/SHZR_068_Cupertino.pdf, accessed on July 23, 2018. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-34 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT  Paleontology. A review of the University of California’s Museum of Paleontology’s fossil locality database was conducted for the City of Cupertino. No paleontological resources have been identified on the project site; however, the presence of Pleistocene deposits that are known to contain fossils indicates that the overall the city could contain paleontological resources. DISCUSSION a) Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: (i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault; (ii) Strong seismic ground shaking; (iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction; (iv) Landslides, mudslides or other similar hazards? Fault Rupture As discussed in the General Plan EIR, only one Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone has been mapped within the City of Cupertino, namely, the zone that flanks the San Andreas Fault in the southwestern most part of the city. Because the site is not located within a State-designated Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone or Santa Clara County-designated Fault Rupture Hazard Zone, and no active faults are known to traverse the site, the risk of surface fault rupture is considered low. The impacts from project development as they relate to surface fault rupture are considered less than significant. Strong Seismic Ground Shaking The hazards posed by strong seismic ground shaking during a major earthquake, while variable, are nearly omnipresent in the San Francisco Bay Area. As discussed in the General Plan EIR, in the event of a large, magnitude 6.7 or greater seismic event, much of the city is projected to experience “strong” ground shaking, with the most intense shaking forecast for the northeast part of the city where the project is located. Adherence to applicable building code, including conformance to the California Building Code (CBC) and the City’s building permit requirements would ensure that the impacts associated with strong seismic ground shaking are minimized to the maximum extent practicable. The impacts of project development as they relate to strong seismic ground shaking would be less than significant. Liquefaction The project site is not located within an area mapped by the State of California or Santa Clara County as having a high potential for seismically induced liquefaction. As discussed in the General Plan EIR, the potential for seismically induced liquefaction in the vicinity appears low and is limited to a very narrow strip of alluvial deposits that flank Calabazas Creek approximately 1 mile east of the project site. Accordingly, impacts associated with project development as they may relate to seismically induced liquefaction would be less than significant. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-35 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Landslides The site is generally flat with elevation ranging from 209 to 213 feet above mean sea level. The project site is not located within an area mapped by the State of California or Santa Clara County as having a high potential for seismically induced landslides. Therefore, impacts associated with project development as they may relate to seismically induced landslides would be less than significant. b) Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil during construction could, in theory, undermine structures and minor slopes during development of the project site. However, compliance with existing regulatory requirements, such as the implementation of grading erosion control measures specified in the CBC and the CMC, would reduce erosion and the loss of topsoil. Examples of these control measures are best management practices such as hydroseeding or short-term biodegradable erosion control blankets; vegetated swales, silt fences, or other forms of protection at storm drain inlets; post-construction inspection of drainage structures for accumulated sediment; and post-construction clearing of debris and sediment from these structures. Section 16.08.110 of the CMC requires the preparation and submittal of Interim Erosion and Sediment Control Plans for all projects subject to City-issued grading permits, which would minimize the removal of topsoil, avoid overly steep cut and/or fill slopes, and protect existing vegetation during grading operations. These requirements are broadly applicable to residential development projects. Adherence to these regulations would help ensure that the impacts of project development as they relate to substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil would be less than significant. c) Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? As discussed in criterion (a), the project site is not located within an area mapped as having significant potential for seismically induced liquefaction. Because of the low potential for liquefaction, the risk of lateral spreading at the site would also be low. Therefore, the impacts of project development as they relate to liquefaction and lateral spreading would be less than significant. The project site is generally flat with an average elevation of 213 feet above mean sea level. The properties surrounding the project site are also typified by low topographic relief. The impacts of project development as they relate to landslides would be less than significant. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-36 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined by Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? Expansive soils can undergo dramatic changes in volume in response to variations in soil moisture content. When wet, these soils can expand; conversely, when dry, they can contract or shrink. Sources of moisture that can trigger this shrink-swell phenomenon can include seasonal rainfall, landscape irrigation, utility leakage, and/or perched groundwater. Expansive soil can develop wide cracks in the dry season, and changes in soil volume have the potential to damage concrete slabs, foundations, and pavement. Special building/structure design or soil treatment are often needed in areas with expansive soils. Expansive soils are typically very fine-grained with a high to very high percentage of clay, typically montmorillonite, smectite, or bentonite clay. The proposed project would be subject to the CBC regulations and provisions, as adopted in CMC Chapter 12.04 and enforced by the City during plan review prior to building permit issuance. The CBC contains specific requirements for seismic safety, excavation, foundations, retaining walls, and site demolition, and also regulates grading activities, including drainage and erosion control. Thus, compliance with existing regulations and policies would ensure that the potential future development impacts permitted under the proposed project would be reduced. Therefore, the impacts of project development due to expansive soils are considered less than significant. e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? The development of the proposed project would not require the construction or use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Therefore, no impact would occur. f) Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? As discussed above in existing conditions, while no paleontological resources have been identified on the project site, because the proposed project requires substantial excavation that could reach significant depths below the ground surface where no such excavation has previously occurred, there could be fossils of potential scientific significance and other unique geologic features that have not been recorded. Such ground-disturbing construction associated with development under the proposed project could cause damage to, or destruction of, paleontological resources or unique geologic features. Impacts to paleontological resources or site or unique geologic features would be reduced to a less-than-significant level with implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-1. Impact GEO-1: The proposed project could directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. Mitigation Measure GEO-1: The construction contractor shall incorporate the following in all grading, demolition, and construction plans: THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-37 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT  In the event that fossils or fossil-bearing deposits are discovered during grading, demolition, or building, excavations within 50 feet of the find shall be temporarily halted or diverted.  The contractor shall notify the City of Cupertino Building Department and a City-approved qualified paleontologist to examine the discovery.  The paleontologist shall document the discovery as needed, in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards (Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 1995), evaluate the potential resource, and assess the significance of the finding under the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5.  The paleontologist shall notify the appropriate agencies to determine procedures that would be followed before construction is allowed to resume at the location of the find.  If the project applicant determines that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall prepare an excavation plan for mitigating the effect of the project based on the qualities that make the resource important. The excavation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to implementation. VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?     b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?     GENERAL PLAN EIR Chapter 4.6, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, of the General Plan EIR, addresses the cumulative impacts from greenhouse gas emissions associated with General Plan buildout, including intensified development of the project site. GHG emissions impacts under the General Plan EIR are less than significant. EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing commercial building (Goodyear Tire) generates GHG emissions from transportation sources, energy (natural gas and purchased energy), and area sources such as landscaping equipment. Current land uses generate approximately 98 average daily trips.86 GHG emissions generated by the existing land uses are shown in Table 4-6 below. 86 Transportation Impact Analysis, Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. May 16, 2019, Table 5, Project Trip Generation Estimates. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-38 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT DISCUSSION a) Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? A project does not generate enough GHG emissions on its own to influence global climate change; therefore, this Section measures the project’s contribution to the cumulative environmental impact associated with GHG emissions. Development permitted under the proposed project would contribute to global climate change through direct and indirect emissions of GHG from transportation sources, energy (natural gas and purchased energy), water use, wastewater generation, and solid waste generation. In addition, construction activities would generate a short-term increase in GHG emissions. The net increase in emissions generated by the project was evaluated using the CalEEMod, Version 2016.3.2.25. The total and net increase in GHG emissions associated with the proposed project are shown in Table 4-6. TABLE 4-6 PROJECT GHG EMISSIONS Category GHG Emissions (MTCO2e/Year) Existing Emissions Project Emissions Net Change from Existing Area <1 <1 <1 Energy 14 326 313 On-Road Mobile Sources 34 861 828 Waste 7 106 99 Water/Wastewater <1 5 5 Amortized Construction Emissions N/A 28 28 Total 54 1,299 1,272 BAAQMD Emissions Threshold (MTCO2e) 1,100 Exceeds BAAQMD Thresholds? Yes Notes: Emissions may not total to 100 percent due to rounding. N/A = not applicable. New buildings would be constructed to the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards (effective January 1, 2020) at a minimum. Existing buildings were constructed prior to the 2005 Building Energy Efficiency Standards; and therefore, the “historic” rates in CalEEMod, which are based on the 2005 Standards, were used to estimate existing building energy use. Transportation emissions include transportation demand management measures, such as the trip reduction program, required under the Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program. Source: California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), Version 2016.3.2.25. Construction Impacts BAAQMD does not have thresholds of significance for construction-related GHG emissions, however, the BAAQMD advises that the lead agency should quantify and disclose GHG emissions that would occur during construction and make a determination on the significance of these construction-generated GHG emissions in relation to meeting AB 32 GHG reduction goals. GHG emissions from construction activities are one-time, short-term emissions and therefore, would not significantly contribute to long-term cumulative GHG emissions impacts of the proposed project. One-time, short-term emissions are converted to average annual emissions by amortizing them over the service life of a building. For buildings THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-39 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT in general, it is reasonable to look at a 30-year time frame, since this is a typical interval before a new building requires the first major renovation.87 As shown in Table 4-6 above, when amortized over a 30- year project lifetime, average annual construction emissions from the proposed project of 28 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year (MTCO2e/year) would represent a nominal source of GHG emissions and would not exceed BAAQMD’s threshold of 1,100 MTCO2e/year. Construction emissions would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures would be required. Operational Impacts Because the project’s net increase in long-term emissions of 1,272 MTCO2e exceeds BAAQMD’s bright-line threshold88 of 1,100 MTCO2e per year, as shown in Table 4-6 above, the following mitigation measure is proposed. Impact GHG-1: The proposed project would generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. Mitigation Measure GHG-1: The project applicant shall offset a minimum of 173 metric tons metric tons of carbon dioxide-equivalent (MTCO2e) emissions per year for a period of 30 years (5,190 MTCO2e) through the purchase of voluntary carbon offsets (i.e., not compliance offsets) from the California Air Resources Board (CARB) approved Offset Project Registries (i.e., Climate Action Reserve, Verra , American Carbon Registry) or forecasted mitigation units (FMUs) (GHG Mitigation Credits) from the Climate Action Reserve’s Climate Forward program. The voluntary carbon offsets or FMUs must be real, additional, permanent, confirmable, and enforceable. The order of preference for purchase of voluntary carbon offsets or FMUs shall be as follows: 1) within the City; 2) within the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin; 3) within the State of California; then 4) elsewhere in the United States. Evidence of payments, and funding of an escrow-type account or endowment fund shall be submitted to the City by the project applicant. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, the project applicant shall submit to the City of Cupertino Building Division official or his/her designee, the necessary documentation to verify the agreement to purchase the necessary voluntary carbon offsets or FMUs to offset project emissions to below 1,100 MTCO2e per year. Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would require the purchase of voluntary carbon credits or FMUs to offset project-generated emissions by 5,190 MTCO2e (173 MTCO2e over the hotel building’s lifetime of 30 years). As a result of implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1, emissions from the proposed project would not exceed the BAAQMD’s bright-line threshold. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. 87 International Energy Agency, 2008, Energy Efficiency Requirements in Building Codes, Energy Efficiency Policies for New Buildings, March. 88 A bright-line rule (or bright-line test) is a clearly defined rule or standard in the United States, composed of objective factors, which leaves little or no room for varying interpretation. The purpose of a bright-line rule is to produce predictable and consistent results in its application. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-40 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT b) Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Applicable plans adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions include the CARB Scoping Plan, Plan Bay Area 2040, and Cupertino’s CAP. A consistency analysis with these plans is presented below. CARB’s Scoping Plan In accordance with Assembly Bill 32 and SB 32 the CARB 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan 89 (Scoping Plan) outlines the State’s strategy to achieve 1990 level emissions by year 2020 and a 40 percent reduction from 1990 emissions by year 2030. The Scoping Plan is applicable to State agencies and is not directly applicable to cities/counties and individual projects. Nonetheless, the Scoping Plan has been the primary tool that is used to develop performance-based and efficiency-based CEQA criteria and GHG reduction targets for climate action planning efforts. Statewide strategies to reduce GHG emissions in the latest Scoping Plan (2017) include implementing SB 350, which expands the Renewables Portfolio Standard to 50 percent by 2030 and doubles energy efficiency savings; expanding the Low Carbon Fuel Standard to 18 percent by 2030; implementing the Mobile Source Strategy to deploy zero-electric vehicle buses and trucks; implementation of the Sustainable Freight Action Plan; implementation of the Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Strategy, which reduces methane and hydrofluorocarbons 40 percent below 2013 levels by 2030 and black carbon emissions 50 percent below 2013 levels by 2030; 2030; continuing to implement SB 375with Statewide measures that have been adopted since AB 32 and SB 32 were adopted. For example, as utility companies comply with the State’s renewable portfolio standards described above, individual developments, like the proposed project, that use the energy generated by the utility companies will be using energy sources that are in compliance with the renewable portfolio standards. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. Plan Bay Area Plan Bay Area 2040, the Bay Area’s RTP/SCS that identifies the sustainable vision for the Bay Area. As previously described in Chapter 3, Project Description, of this Initial Study, the project site is located in the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority City Cores, Corridors & Station Areas PDA. The proposed project is an infill development project that would result in an increase in land use intensity in a portion of the City that has access to existing infrastructure and services, including transit service. As discussed in Section XII, Population and Housing, growth associated with the proposed project is consistent with ABAG projections and would not exceed regional population and employment projects. Additionally, the proposed project would implement a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program (see Section 3.2.2.3, Transportation Demand Management Program, in Chapter 3, Project Description, of this Initial Study), that would include a shuttle service for hotel employees and guests. Therefore, the proposed 89 Note that the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan is an update to the 2008 and 2014 Scoping Plans. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-41 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT project would not conflict with the land use concept plan for the City of Cupertino identified in the Plan Bay Area 2040 and the impact would be less than significant. Cupertino Climate Action Plan The Cupertino CAP is a strategic planning document that identifies sources of GHG emissions within the City’s boundaries, presents current and future emissions estimates, identifies a GHG reduction target for future years, and presents strategic goals, measures, and actions to reduce emissions from the energy, transportation and land use, water, solid waste, and green infrastructure sectors. The emissions reduction strategies developed by the City followed the BAAQMD’s CEQA Guidelines (2011) and the corresponding criteria for a Qualified Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Program as defined by the BAAQMD, which in turn were developed to comply with the requirements of AB 32 and achieve the goals of CARB’s 2008 Scoping Plan. Since the adoption of the CAP in January of 2015, the Legislature adopted SB 32 (September 2016) and CARB adopted the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan (December 2017), aimed at meeting SB 32’s GHG reduction goal of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. Qualified GHG Reduction Strategy A qualified GHG reduction strategy adopted by a local jurisdiction should include the following elements, described in the State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5. BAAQMD’s revised CEQA Guidelines provides the methodology to determine if a GHG reduction strategy meets these requirements. The following includes a description of the BAAQMD methodology and how the Cupertino CAP meets the requirement. 1. Quantify GHG emissions, both existing and projected over a specified time period, resulting from activities within a defined geographic area.  Cupertino’s CAP identifies a baseline GHG emissions inventory for year 2010 and business-as- usual forecasts for 2020, 2035, and 2050 for land uses within the City. 2. Establish a level, based on substantial evidence, below which the contribution to greenhouse gas emissions from activities covered by the plan would not be cumulatively considerable.  The City has established a goal of 15 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 and 35 percent below 2005 levels by 2035. The 2020 GHG reduction goal is in line with AB 32. However, the 2030 goal was adopted prior to SB 32. 3. Identify and analyze the GHG emissions resulting from specific actions or categories of actions anticipated within the geographic area.  The GHG emissions sources calculated in the baseline GHG emissions inventory include commercial, residential, and industrial electricity and natural gas use, on-road transportation, solid waste disposal, energy use related to water and wastewater, agricultural off-road equipment and emissions associated with fertilizer application, and off-road equipment use for construction and lawn and garden activities. GHG emissions from these activities were calculated from activity THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-42 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT data such as kilowatt hours of electricity, therms of natural gas, tons of waste disposed, and vehicle miles traveled from trips with an origin or destination in Cupertino. 4. Specify measures or a group of measures, including performance standards, that substantial evidence demonstrates, if implemented on a project-by-project basis, would collectively achieve the specified emissions level.  The Cupertino CAP has identified groups of measures and performance standards aimed at achieving these targets: Reduce Energy Use/Improve Facilities; Encourage Alternative Transportation/Convert Vehicle Fleet; Conserve Potable Water; Reduce Solid Waste; and Expand Green Infrastructure. The Cupertino CAP strategies achieve the near-term (i.e., 2020) GHG reduction target. Strategies for the post-2020 targets were not quantified. 5. Establish a mechanism to monitor the plan’s progress toward achieving the target GHG emissions level and to require amendment if the plan is not achieving specified levels.  The City has a sustainability division that implements and tracks the City’s GHG reduction strategies and progress toward GHG reduction targets. The City’s sustainability division prepares annual reports on CAP implementation and progress as part of the monitoring program, including projects and policies, data and metrics, as well as inventory updates to determine if the CAP is achieving its targeted goals. 6. Be adopted in a public process following environmental review.  The City’s 2015 addendum to General Plan EIR 90 demonstrated that that adoption of the Cupertino CAP would not create any new or substantially more severe significant effects on the environment that were not analyzed in the General Plan EIR certified in 2014.91 Based on the analysis above, the City’s CAP is a qualified GHG reduction plan for the AB 32 targets. In addition, a specific project proposal is considered consistent with the Cupertino CAP if it does not conflict with the required GHG reduction measures contained in the adopted CAP. The adopted GHG reduction measures applicable to the proposed project include the following:  Measure C-E-1 Energy Use Data and Analysis: Increase resident and building owner/tenant/operator knowledge about how, when, and where building energy is used.  Measure C-W-1 SB-X7-7: Implement water conservation policies contained within Cupertino’s Urban Water Management Plan to achieve 20 percent per capita water reduction by 2020.  Measure C-SW-1 Zero Waste Goal: Maximize solid waste diversion community-wide through preparation of a zero-waste strategic plan. 90 City of Cupertino, approved General Plan Amendment, Housing Element Update, and Associated Rezoning EIR Final Addendum, State Clearinghouse Number 2014032007. October 2015. 91 City of Cupertino, certified General Plan Amendment, Housing Element Update, and Associated Rezoning EIR, State Clearinghouse Number 2014032007. December 2014. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-43 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT  Measure C-SW-3 Construction & Demolition Waste Diversion Program: Continue to enforce diversion requirements in City’s Construction & Demolition Debris Diversion and Green Building Ordinances. As described in Chapter 3, Project Description, energy conservation measures would be used as part of interior lighting for the new building, such as employing automatic sensors to turn off lights when guests are not present in guest rooms and various glazing treatments on exterior facades. The project incorporates water conservation features for on-site irrigation. The irrigation water on the site would be dual-sourced recycled water and potable water as available from the LASD. Any lawn areas would use 100 percent recycled water. All landscape zones would be irrigated as required by the Cupertino Landscape Ordinance, and water uses would be tailored to meet CALGreen Building Standards, which requires water conservation and requires new buildings to reduce water consumption by 20 percent. The project would also comply with CMC Chapter 16.72, Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Waste, and the City’s Zero Waste Policy. Additionally, the proposed project would include a photovoltaic system that would offset GHG emissions from electricity generated by the project. Development in the Cupertino, including the proposed project, is required to adhere to City-adopted policy provisions, including those contained in the adopted CAP. The City ensures that the provisions of the Cupertino CAP are incorporated into projects and their permits through development review and applications of conditions of approval as applicable. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant. VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials?     b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?     c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous materials, substances or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?     d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?     e) For a project within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?     THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-44 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?     g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires?     GENERAL PLAN EIR Chapter 4.7, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the General Plan EIR, addressees the hazards- and hazardous materials-related impacts as a result of intensified development in Cupertino. Impacts are found to be less than significant and less than significant with mitigation measures to ensure that development on sites with known hazardous contamination would be less than significant. General Plan EIR Mitigation Measures HAZ-4a and HAZ-4b are required to be implemented for sites with known contamination and potential residual contamination. As discussed in Chapter 4.7, the project site is not listed as a site with known contamination or potential residual contamination; therefore, the identified mitigation measures in the General Plan EIR do not apply to the proposed project. The following is a summary of Section, 4.7.1.2, Existing Conditions, of Chapter 4.7. EXISTING CONDITIONS A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated August 8, 2018 was prepared for the project site by AEI Consultants. 92 The purpose of the Phase I ESA was to identify potential Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) associated with the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in the vicinity of the project site. Note that the Phase I ESA also evaluated Controlled RECs, which are locations where the past release of hazardous materials has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls, and Historical RECs, which are also satisfactorily addressed but are not subject to any required controls. The Phase I ESA With respect to the UST, as part of the Phase II ESA, ARTI performed a geophysical survey within accessible areas of the site to evaluate the presence of the 200-gallon waste oil UST. The ground penetrating radar, also referred to as “GPR,” method used did not identify any anomalies or signatures from the scans that would suggest the presence of the UST. The Phase II ESA included seven soil boring samples and two soil vapor samplings. The Phase II ESA determined that very low detectable concentrations of diesel, motor oil, Volatile Organic Compounds 92 Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. (ARTI), 2018, Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Soil & Vapor Sampling Results, 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California. October 26, 2018. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-45 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (VOCs), and PCB contaminants were reported in the seven soil borings. However, these soil concentrations were determined to be below the San Francisco Regional Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Tier 1 Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs). The soil vapor samplings indicated relatively low levels of VOCs, which are also below the San Francisco Bay RWQCB Tier 1 ESLs for soil gas. 93, 94 The Nimitz and Louis E. Stocklmier Elementary Schools are located about 1 mile to the north, the Homestead High School and Cupertino Middle School are approximately 0.75 miles and 1.5 miles west, respectively and the Saint Joseph Cupertino School and William Faria Elementary School are located approximately 0.8 miles and 1.6 miles to the south, respectively. The nearest public airports are San Jose International Airport, approximately 6 miles to the northeast, and Palo Alto Airport, approximately 9.3 miles to the northwest. The nearest heliports are McCandless Towers Heliport, approximately 4.5 miles to the northeast, and County Medical Center Heliport, approximately 5.6 miles to the southeast. The project site is not located in within an airport land use plan. The site is not in a State Responsibility Area for wildfires, and there are no moderate, high, or very high fire hazard severity zones in the Local Responsibility Areas in the vicinity of the project site.95 DISCUSSION a) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? Construction Impacts Construction activities at the project site would involve the use of larger amounts of hazardous materials than would operation of the proposed project, such as petroleum-based fuels for maintenance and construction equipment, and coatings used in construction, which would be transported to the site periodically by vehicle and would be present temporarily during construction. These potentially hazardous materials would not be of a type or occur in sufficient quantities on-site to pose a significant hazard to public health and safety or the environment, and their use during construction would be short-term. Additionally, as with proposed project operation, the use, transport, and disposal of construction-related hazardous materials would be required to conform to existing laws and regulations. Compliance with applicable laws and regulations governing the use, storage, and transportation of hazardous materials 93 Tier 1 ESLs are used as a general screening guide to determine whether additional investigation, remedial actions, or risk assessment may be required. The Tier 1 ESLs are conservative, and are based on the lowest exposure pathway of concern, whether it is direct human exposure in residential land use, construction worker exposure, potential leaching of contaminants to shallow groundwater, open space terrestrial habitat, or other exposure pathways. 94 Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. (ARTI), 2018, Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Soil & Vapor Sampling Results, 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California. October 26, 2018. 95 CAL FIRE, 2019, http://www.fire.ca.gov/firepreventionfee/sraviewer_launch, accessed on January 6, 2019, and Santa Clara County Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Area, http://frap.fire.ca.gov/webdata/maps/santa_clara/fhszl_map.43.pdf, accessed on August 31, 2018. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-46 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT would ensure that all potentially hazardous materials are used and handled in an appropriate manner and would minimize the potential for safety impacts to occur. Consequently, associated impacts from construction of the proposed project would be less than significant. Operational Impacts The proposed hotel would not involve the routine transport or disposing of hazardous materials. Project operation would involve the use of small amounts of hazardous materials for cleaning and maintenance purposes, such as cleansers, degreasers, pesticides, and fertilizers. These potentially hazardous materials would not be of a type or be present in sufficient quantities to pose a significant hazard to public health and safety or the environment. Furthermore, such substances would be used, transported, stored, and disposed of in accordance with applicable federal, State, and local laws, policies, and regulations. Any businesses that transport, generate, use, and/or dispose of hazardous materials in Cupertino are subject to existing hazardous materials regulations, such as those implemented by Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Compliance Division and hazardous materials permits from the SCCFD. The SCCFD also conducts inspections for fire safety and hazardous materials management of businesses and multi-family dwellings, in accordance with the City of Cupertino Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance in Title 9, Health and Sanitation, Chapter 9.12, Hazardous Materials Storage. Thus, associated impacts from the operational phase of the project would be less than significant. b) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? As described in criterion (a) above, construction and operation of the proposed project would involve the storage and use of common cleaning substances, building maintenance products, paints, and solvents, as well as petroleum-based fuels for maintenance and construction equipment, and coatings used in construction. As described in the existing conditions, the existing building was developed in 1971 to 1972 and the Phase I ESA identified that, although all suspect ACMs and LBP are in good condition and do not currently pose a health or safety concern, the demolition of the building could release these hazardous materials. An impact could occur if construction and operation of the proposed project creates conditions where hazardous materials could contaminate surrounding soil, water, or air. The most likely scenarios would be demolition and rainwater runoff spreading contaminated materials. Stormwater runoff is discussed in Section IX, Hydrology and Water Quality, of this Initial Study and impacts were found to be less than significant. Construction Impacts The type of construction materials and equipment would be considered standard for this type of development. All spills or leakage of petroleum products during construction activities are required to be THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-47 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT immediately contained, the hazardous material identified, and the material remediated in compliance with applicable State and local regulations. All contaminated waste would be required to be collected and disposed of at an appropriately licensed disposal or treatment facility. Furthermore, strict adherence to all emergency response plan requirements set forth by the Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Compliance Division would be required through the duration of the construction of each individual development project.96 As described in the existing conditions discussion above, the Phase II, identified very low detectable concentrations of diesel, motor oil, VOCs, and PCB contaminants, which were below the San Francisco Bay RWQCB Tier 1 ESLs and Soil Gas ESLs. Accordingly, no construction related impacts are anticipated from these sources. Furthermore, the geophysical survey, which applied the GDR method, did not identify any USTs.97 However, due to the relatively small size (approximately 2 feet by 4 feet) of the 200-gallon waste oil UST there is the remote possibility that the geophysical survey could miss the single UST that EDR records show was installed at the project site in 1973, but has no record of its removal. In the unlikely event that the UST is encountered during site grading and excavation activities, it would be required to be removed in accordance with the existing standards and regulations of, and oversight by, the SCCFD, based on compliance authority granted through the California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Division 3, Chapter 16, Underground Tank Regulations. Under these regulations, soil samples from areas where USTs have been removed or where soil contamination is suspected would be required to be analyzed for hydrocarbons including gasoline and diesel in accordance with procedures set forth by SCCFD. If hydrocarbons are identified in the soil, the appropriate response/remedial measures would be required to be implemented as directed by SCCFD with support review from the San Francisco Bay RWQCB until all specified requirements are satisfied and a Tank Closure Letter is issued. Compliance requirements relative to the removal/closure of storage tanks are set forth through the California Health and Safety Code, Sections 25280 through 25299. It is important to note that although future soil samples could be required consistent with requirements if the UST is encountered, soil samples have already been tested and found to be below the San Francisco Bay RWQCB Tier 1 ESLs and Soil Gas ESLs. The Phase I ESA revealed visible evidence that ACMs and LBPs in good condition are present on the project site. Removal these types of hazardous materials by contractors licensed to remove and handle these materials would be conducted in accordance with existing federal, State, and local regulations, including the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (Code of Federal Regulation Part 61), BAAQMD’s Regulation 11, Title 8 of the California Codes of Regulations, the Unified Program, and the City’s General Plan Health and Safety Element Policy HS-6.1, and would ensure that risks associates with the transport, storage, use, and disposal of such materials would be reduced to the maximum extent practical. 96 Santa Clara County Ordinance Code, Division B11, Chapter XIII (Hazardous Materials Storage Ordinance), Chapter XIV (Toxic Gas Ordinance). 97 Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. (ARTI), 2018, Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Soil & Vapor Sampling Results, 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California. October 26, 2018. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-48 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Based on the findings of the Phase I and Phase II ESAs, and compliance with mandatory regulations, associated impacts from the demolition phase of the project would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are required. Operational Impacts The proposed hotel is not considered the type of project that would create a hazardous materials threat to the users of the site or the surrounding land uses. The Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Compliance Division is the Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for Santa Clara County including the City of Cupertino and is responsible for enforcing Chapter 6.95 of the California Health and Safety Code. As the CUPA, Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Compliance Division is required to regulate hazardous materials business plans (HMBP) and chemical inventory, hazardous waste and tiered permitting, USTs , and risk-management plans. The HMBP is required to contain basic information on the location, type, quantity, and health risks of hazardous materials stored, used, or disposed of on development sites. The HMBP also contains an emergency-response plan, which describes the procedures for mitigating a hazardous release, procedures, and equipment for minimizing the potential damage of a hazardous materials release, and provisions for immediate notification of the California Emergency Management Agency and other emergency-response personnel, such as the SCCFD. Implementation of the emergency response plan facilitates rapid response in the event of an accidental spill or release, thereby reducing potential adverse impacts. Furthermore, Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Compliance Division is required to conduct ongoing routine inspections to ensure compliance with existing laws and regulations; to identify safety hazards that could cause or contribute to an accidental spill or release; and to suggest preventative measures to minimize the risk of a spill or release of hazardous substances. Mandatory compliance with these regulations would ensure that the risk of accidents and spills is minimized to the maximum extent practicable during the operation of the proposed project. Consequently, associated impacts would be less than significant. c) Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous materials, substances or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? There are no existing or proposed schools within 0.25 miles of the project site. Thus, no impact would occur, and no mitigation measures would be required. d) Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? As stated in the existing conditions discussion above, the project site was not identified as being on a listed as a site pursuant to California Government Code Section 65952.5. The Phase I ESA prepared for the project site documents the past and present use of hazardous materials at the project site by the existing automotive service facility. The Phase II ESA concluded that all such materials were below the significance THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-49 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT thresholds and would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Accordingly, impacts would be less than significant. e) For a project within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people living or working in the project area? The project site is not within an airport land use plan or within 2 miles of a public use airport. Thus, there would be no impact related to public airport hazards. f) Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? The City of Cupertino Office of Emergency Services is responsible for coordinating agency response to disasters or other large-scale emergencies in the City of Cupertino with assistance from the Santa Clara County Office of Emergency Services and the SCCFD. The Cupertino Emergency Operations Plan (EOP)98 establishes policy direction for emergency planning, mitigation, response, and recovery activities within the city. The Cupertino EOP addresses interagency coordination, procedures to maintain communications with county and State emergency response teams, and methods to assess the extent of damage and management of volunteers. The proposed project would not block roads and would not impede emergency access to surrounding properties or neighborhoods. Emergency vehicle access would be provided at two points located on North De Anza Boulevard: one located at the northern end of the project site and one located at the southern end of the project site. During demolition and construction, vehicles, equipment, and materials would be staged and stored on a portion of the project site. The construction site and staging areas would be clearly marked, and construction fencing would be installed to prevent disturbance and safety hazards. No staging would occur in the public right-of-way. A combination of on- and off-site parking facilities for construction workers would be identified during demolition, grading, and construction. The proposed project would not interfere with an adopted emergency response plan, or emergency evacuation plan; therefore, impacts would be less than significant. g) Would the project expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires? The project site is fully developed and is surrounded by built-out urban use. The site is not in a State Responsibility Area for wildfires.99 There are no very high fire hazard severity zones within the Local Responsibility Areas of Cupertino and there are no high or very high fire risk areas as shown on the City’s 98 City of Cupertino, Office of Emergency Services. Emergency Operations Plan. September 2005. 99 CAL FIRE, 2019, http://www.fire.ca.gov/firepreventionfee/sraviewer_launch, accessed on January 6, 2019. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-50 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT adopted Wildland Urban Interface Fire Area map.100 The proposed project would not subject people or structures to wildfire hazards, and no impact would occur. IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?     b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?     c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off- site; ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site; iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or iv) Impede or redirect flood flows?     d) In a flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk the release of pollutants due to project inundation?     e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?     GENERAL PLAN EIR Chapter 4.8, Hydrology and Water Quality, of the General Plan EIR, addresses the hydrology- and water quality-related impacts as a result of intensified development of the project site. These impacts are identified as less than significant in the General Plan EIR. The following is a summary of Section, 4.8.1.2, Existing Conditions, of Chapter 4.8. 100 City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 16, Building and Construction, Chapter 16.74. Wildland Urban Interface Fire Area. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-51 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT EXISTING CONDITIONS The project site lies within the Sunnyvale East Channel watershed. No creeks are present on the project site. In addition to the natural drainage system, a network of storm drains collects runoff from city streets and carries it to the creeks and San Francisco Bay. The City of Cupertino Department of Public Works is responsible for the design, construction, and maintenance of City-owned facilities including public streets, sidewalks, curb, gutter, storm drains. The capacity of the storm drain facilities within the City of Cupertino was evaluated and documented in the 2018 Storm Drain Master Plan, which identifies the areas within the system that do not have the capacity to handle runoff during the 10-year storm event, which is the City’s design standard. As described in the 2018 Strom Drain Master Plan, the project site is located in an area where the storm drains are deficient in conveying water from a 10-year storm. The lines on Homestead Road, from Sunnyvale East Channel to De Anza Boulevard are currently under capacity and designated as low priority for replacement.101 The project site, as well as the entire city, is within the Santa Clara Subbasin of the Santa Clara Valley Groundwater Basin. In 2012, approximately 40 percent of the water used in Santa Clara County was pumped from groundwater.102 The depth of groundwater is estimated to be 125 feet below ground surface or deeper. 103 The rest of the water used in the County is purchased from the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD), which receives surface water from the State Water Project (SWP) and the Central Valley Project (CVP). Additional details on water usage and local water purveyors are provided in Section XVII, Utilities and Service Systems, of this Initial Study. Santa Clara Valley streams do not receive discharges from industrial or municipal wastewater.104 Industrial discharges are routed to municipal sanitary sewers and then to regional municipal wastewater treatment plants that discharge treated effluent to the tidal sloughs of San Francisco Bay. The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program was established by the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) to regulate municipal and industrial discharges to surface waters of the United States from their municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s). Municipal storm water discharges in the City of Cupertino are subject to the Waste Discharge Requirements of the new Municipal Regional Permit (MRP; Order Number R2-2015-0049) and NPDES Permit Number CAS612008, which became effective on January 1, 2016. Construction activities that disturb one or more acres of land that could impact hydrologic resources must comply with the requirements of the State Water Regional Water Control Board (SWRCB) Construction General Permit (2009-0009-DWQ) as amended by 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012-0006-DWQ. Under the terms of the permit, applicants must file Permit Registration Documents (PRDs) with the 101 Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers. 2018. Cupertino Storm Drain Master Plan. 102 Santa Clara Valley Water District, 2012. Annual Groundwater Report for Calendar Year 2012. 103 AEI Consultants, 2018, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California. August 8, 2018. 104 Santa Clara Basin Watershed Initiative, 2003. Volume 1, Watershed Characteristics Report, http://www.scbwmi.org/ accessed May 30, 2018. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-52 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT SWRCB prior to the start of construction. The PRDs include a Notice of Intent (NOI), risk assessment, site map, Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), annual fee, and a signed certification statement. The PRDs are now submitted electronically to the SWRCB via the Stormwater Multiple Application and Report Tracking System (SMARTS) website. The San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) monitors surface water quality through implementation of the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin (Basin Plan) and designates beneficial uses for surface water bodies and groundwater within the Santa Clara Valley. The Basin Plan also contains water quality criteria for groundwater. Groundwater quality in the Santa Clara subbasin is generally considered to be good and water quality objectives are met in at least 95 percent of the County water supply wells without the use of treatment methods.105 The City of Cupertino is more than 8 miles south of San Francisco Bay and is more than 100 feet above mean sea level, which places the city at a distance that is considered too far to be affected by a tsunami.106 There are no large bodies of water within the City of Cupertino or near the project site; thus, the project site would not be impacted by a seiche. DISCUSSION a) Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? Because the project would disturb one or more acres during construction, the project applicant would be required to comply with State’s Construction General Permit and submit PRDs to the SWRCB prior to the start of construction. The PRDs include a NOI and a site-specific construction SWPPP that describes the incorporation of best management practices to control sedimentation, erosion, and hazardous materials contamination of runoff during construction. New requirements by the SWRCB would also require the project applicant to prepare a construction SWPPP that includes post construction treatment measures aimed at minimizing storm water runoff. With implementation of these measures, water quality impacts during construction would be less than significant. In addition, all new development or redevelopment projects that create and/or replace 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surfaces would be required to incorporate source control, site design, and stormwater treatment measures into the project, pursuant to the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program C.3 requirements. The requirements include minimization of impervious surfaces, measures to detain or infiltrate runoff from peak flows to match pre-development conditions, and agreements to ensure that the stormwater treatment and flow control facilities are maintained in perpetuity. The proposed project would provide several bioretention water treatment areas at ground 105 Santa Clara Valley Water District, 2016. Santa Clara Valley Water District, 2016. 2016 Groundwater Management Plan. 106 Association of Bay Area Governments, 2014. Interactive Tsunami Inundation Map. http://gis.abag.ca.gov/website/Hazards/?hlyr=tsunami accessed May 30, 2018. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-53 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT level, as raised flow-through planters, and drainage management areas throughout the project site. Implementation of this measures and compliance with the C.3 requirements of the MRP would ensure that post-development impacts to water quality would be less than significant. Adherence to applicable water quality regulations, preparation of a SWPPP, implementation of best management practices during construction, and compliance with the CMC would ensure that water quality standards are not violated during construction. Implementation of stormwater site design, source control and stormwater treatment measures and compliance with C.3 provisions of the MRP and the City of Cupertino’s stormwater requirements would result in less-than-significant impacts during operation of the project. Consequently, potential impacts associated with water quality during construction and operation would be less than significant. b) Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? The project would be connected to municipal water supplies and does not propose any groundwater wells on the property. Water is supplied to the project site by California Water Service Company (Cal Water), which obtains its water from groundwater production (35 percent) and purchases of surface water from the Santa Clara Valley Water District. The 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for the Los Altos Suburban District, which includes the area for the project site, states that there is sufficient water for their customers for normal, single-dry, and multiple-dry years and that additional groundwater can be pumped to meet demand through 2040.107 Therefore, the project would not result in a depletion of groundwater supplies or result in a lowering of groundwater levels. Water supply is discussed in Section XVII, Utilities and Service Systems, below. Furthermore, due to the project’s location, the development of the proposed project would not interfere with groundwater recharge that takes place in the McClellan Ponds recharge facility located within the City of Cupertino or the creeks and streams that run through the city. Therefore, the project would have a less-than-significant impact to groundwater recharge. The proposed project would be located on a site that is already developed and currently has a high percentage of impervious surfaces. The proposed project would result in an increase in the amount of impervious surfaces from 38,380 square feet to 49,918 square feet. The project would install several bioretention areas, which would contribute to groundwater recharge by infiltration. The use of site design features required by provision C.3 of the Municipal Regional Permit (MRP) and compliance with the City of Cupertino General Plan policies would reduce the impact of increased impervious surfaces on groundwater recharge. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less-than-significant impact on groundwater supplies and groundwater recharge, and no mitigation measures are needed. c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious 107 California Water Service Company, 2015. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan, Los Altos Suburban District. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-54 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT surfaces, in a manner which would: result in substantial erosion, siltation, or flooding on- or off-site; substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site; create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or impede or redirect flood flows? The proposed project would take place within the boundaries of a fully developed site that is currently connected to the City’s storm drain system. The proposed redevelopment does not involve the alteration of any natural drainage channels or any watercourse. As described in the 2018 Storm Drain Master Plan, the project site is located in an area where the storm drains are insufficient in size to convey water from a 10-year storm. The lines on Homestead Road, from Sunnyvale East Channel to De Anza Boulevard are currently under capacity and designated as low priority for replacement.108 However, the proposed project would not exacerbate this existing condition. The proposed project would provide several bioretention and flow-through planter water treatment areas on the project site and would provide other detention facilities that would meter the peak runoff from the site for a 10-year storm event. These would collect runoff from roof areas, parking lots, sidewalks and streets for treatment and flow control prior to discharge into the on-site storm drain system, which connects to the City’s storm drain system in North De Anza Boulevard. When combined, the on-site water treatment areas would meet the C.3 of the MRP required treatment areas of 1,997 square feet. The project applicant would be required, pursuant to the C.3 provisions of the MRP, to implement construction phase best management practices, post-construction design measures that encourage infiltration in pervious areas, and post-construction source control measures to help keep pollutants out of stormwater. In addition, post-construction stormwater treatment measures would be required since the project would create and/or replace more than 10,000 square feet of impervious surface. These measures would reduce the amount of stormwater runoff from the project. During construction, the project applicant would be subject to the NPDES construction permit requirements, including preparation of a SWPPP. The SWPPP includes erosion and sediment control measures to stabilize the site, protect slopes and channels, control the perimeter of the site, minimize the area and duration of exposed soils, and protect receiving waters adjacent to the site. Once constructed, the requirements for new development or redevelopment projects, include source control measures and site design measures that address stormwater runoff, and would reduce the potential for erosion or siltation. In addition, Provision C.3 of the MRP would require the project to implement stormwater treatment measures to contain site runoff, using specific numeric sizing criteria based on volume and flow rate. With implementation of these erosion and sediment control measures and regulatory provisions to limit runoff for new development sites, the proposed project would not result 108 Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers. 2018. Cupertino Storm Drain Master Plan. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-55 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT in significant increases in erosion and sedimentation or contribute to flooding on-site or off-site and impacts would be less than significant. d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, would the project risk the release of pollutants due to project inundation? The project site is not located in close proximity to San Francisco Bay or the Pacific Ocean, and is not within a mapped tsunami inundation zone.109 Because there are no large bodies of water, such as reservoirs or lakes, in the vicinity of the project site, there would be no potential for seiches to impact the project site. In addition, the site is in a relatively flat area of the City and is outside of the ABAG mapped zones for earthquake-induced landslides or debris flow source areas.110 Therefore, no impact would occur with respect to the release of pollutants from these types of natural hazard events. e) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? The project site is not within the purview of a sustainable groundwater management plan. The San Francisco Bay RWQCB monitors surface water quality through implementation of the Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay Basin, also referred to as the “Basin Plan” and designates beneficial uses for surface water bodies and groundwater within the Santa Clara Valley. The Basin Plan also contains water quality criteria for groundwater. As required by storm water management guidelines discussed under criterion (a), best management practices and low impact development measures would be implemented across the project site during both construction and operation of the proposed project. These measures would control and prevent the release of sediment, debris, and other pollutants into the storm drain system. Implementation of best management practices during construction would be in accordance with the provisions of the SWPPP, which would minimize the release of sediment, soil, and other pollutants. Operational best management practices would be required to meet the C.3 provisions of the MRP. These best management practices include the incorporation of site design, source control, and treatment control measures to treat and control runoff before it enters the storm drain system. The proposed treatment measures would include the use of several bioretention areas to treat and detain runoff prior to discharge to the City’s storm drain system. Additionally, as discussed in criterion (b), the project would be connected to municipal water supplies and does not propose any groundwater wells on the property. The depth of groundwater is estimated to be 125 feet below ground surface or deeper and the proposed project would not disturb groundwater during construction. With implementation of these best management practices and low impact development measures in accordance with City and MRP requirements, the potential impact on 109 Association of Bay Area Governments, 2019. Interactive Tsunami Inundation Map. http://gis.abag.ca.gov/website/Hazards/?hlyr=tsunami accessed on January 6, 2019. 110 Association of Bay Area Governments, 2019. Rainfall-Induced Landslides, Debris Flow Source Areas and Earthquake Induced Landslides. Accessed at http://resilience.abag.ca.gov/landslides/ on January 6, 2019. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-56 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT water quality would be less than significant. Accordingly, the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct the implementation of the Basin Plan. X. LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact a) Physically divide an established community?     b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?     GENERAL PLAN EIR As discussed in Chapter 4.9, Land Use and Planning, of the General Plan EIR, impacts are determined to be less than significant as a result of intensified development of the project site. The following is a summary of Section, 4.9.1.2, Existing Conditions, of Chapter 4.9. EXISTING CONDITIONS The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Commercial/Residential and the project site is within the General Commercial with special development regulations (CG-rg) Zoning District. A complete description of the Commercial/Residential land use designation and (CG-rg) Zoning District is presented in Section 3.1.4, Land Use Designation and Zoning, in Chapter 3 of this Initial Study. DISCUSSION a) Would the project physically divide an established community? Because the development of the proposed project would occur on a site that is currently developed, would retain the existing roadway patterns, and would not introduce any new major roadways or other physical features through existing residential neighborhoods or other communities that would create new barriers, the project would not physically divide an established community. Therefore, no impact would occur. b) Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? As previously described, a General Plan Amendment Authorization resolution was adopted by City Council that allows the project applicant to apply for a General Plan Amendment Plan to increase the hotel development allocation up to 156 rooms, increase the height, and reduce the building plane setback THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-57 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT requirements in the Homestead Special Area and North De Anza Gateway.111 The proposed project is within the parameters evaluated in the General Plan EIR (145 feet compared to 88 feet at the highest point and 250 rooms compared to 156 rooms) and the General Plan EIR found land use impacts to be less than significant. The proposed hotel would be consistent with the types of development envisioned in the Homestead Special Area and North De Anza Gateway. Accordingly, the proposed project would also result in less-than-significant impacts with regard to conflicts with land use plans. XI. NOISE Would the proposed project result in: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or in other applicable local, State, or federal standards?     b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?     c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?     GENERAL PLAN EIR Chapter 4.10, Noise, of the General Plan EIR, addresses the noise and vibration impacts associated with intensified development of the project site. The following is a summary of Section, 4.10.1.3, Existing Conditions, of Chapter 4.10. EXISTING CONDITIONS Noise is defined as unwanted sound and is known to have several adverse effects on people, including hearing loss, speech and sleep interference, physiological responses, and annoyance. Based on these known adverse effects of noise, the federal government, State of California, and City of Cupertino have established criteria to protect public health and safety and to prevent disruption of certain human activities. Noise-related terminology/descriptors, pertinent existing regulations and Cupertino General Plan Health and Safety Element guidelines, calculations for traffic noise levels, and calculations for construction noise and vibration levels can be found in Appendix C, Noise Data, of this Initial Study. 111 City of Cupertino General Plan Amendment Authorization Number 2018-01, Resolution Number 19-010, Passed and Adopted at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino on January 15, 2019. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-58 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT The principal noise sources affecting the project site are traffic noise from I-280, De Anza Boulevard, and Homestead Road. The nearest public airports are San Jose International Airport, approximately 6 miles to the northeast, and Palo Alto Airport, approximately 9.3 miles to the northwest. The nearest heliports are McCandless Towers Heliport, approximately 4.5 miles to the northeast, and County Medical Center Heliport, approximately 5.6 miles to the southeast. The nearest private airport is Moffett Federal Airfield, approximately 4.75 miles to the northwest. The nearest residences (Aviare Apartments) are located approximately 150 feet east of the project site across De Anza Boulevard. The Cupertino Hotel is adjacent to the project site to the south. DISCUSSION a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or in other applicable local, State, or federal standards? A significant stationary-source impact would occur if the activities or equipment at the proposed project site produce noise levels at nearby sensitive receptors in excess of local standards. With respect to projected-related increases, noise impacts can be placed into three categories. The first is “audible” impacts, which refer to increases in noise level that are perceptible to humans. Audible increases in general community noise levels generally refer to a change of 3 decibels (dB) or more since this level has been found to be the threshold of perceptibility in exterior environments. The second category, “potentially audible” impacts, refers to a change in noise level between 1 and 3 dB. The last category includes changes in noise level of less than 1 dB that are typically “inaudible” to the human ear except under quiet conditions in controlled environments. Only “audible” changes in noise levels at sensitive receptor locations (i.e., 3 dB or more) are considered potentially significant. Note that a doubling of traffic flows (i.e., 10,000 vehicles per day to 20,000 per day) would be needed to create a 3 dB increase in traffic-generated noise levels. An increase of 3 dB is often used as a threshold for a substantial increase. Project-Related Construction Noise In terms of the proposed construction activities, the demolition, grading, and site paving activities are expected to generate the highest noise levels, since they involve the largest and most powerful equipment. Construction equipment for the proposed project would include equipment such as concrete saws, graders, tractors, loaders, backhoes, paving equipment, forklifts, rollers, and a crane. Two types of short-term noise impacts could occur during construction: (1) mobile-source noise from transport of workers, material deliveries, and debris and soil haul and (2) stationary-source noise from use of construction equipment. The following discusses construction noise impacts to the off-site sensitive receptors. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-59 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Construction Vehicles The transport of workers and materials to and from the construction site would incrementally increase noise levels along local roadways. Individual construction vehicle pass-bys may create momentary noise levels of up to approximately 85 dBA (Lmax) at 50 feet from the vehicle, but these occurrences would generally be infrequent and short lived. Therefore, noise impacts from construction-related truck traffic would be less than significant at noise-sensitive receptors along the construction routes and no mitigation measures would be required. Construction Equipment According to CMC Section 10.48.053, construction is allowed during “daytime hours” (7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekends) and exempt from the City’s daytime and nighttime maximum noise level limits, provided that such construction activities do not exceed 80 dBA at the nearest affected property or individual equipment items do not exceed 87 dBA at 25 feet. Only one of these two criteria must be met. In addition, construction is prohibited on holidays and within 750 feet of residential areas on weekends, holidays, and during the nighttime, unless a special exception has been granted, and during nighttime hours unless it meets the nighttime noise level standards. Even with these restrictions, project construction would temporarily increase ambient noise. However, noise levels would subside again after construction. Noise generated by on-site construction equipment is based on the type of equipment used, its location relative to sensitive receptors, and the timing and duration of noise-generating activities. Each stage of construction involves different kinds of equipment and has distinct noise characteristics. Noise levels from construction activities are typically dominated by the loudest pieces of equipment. The dominant equipment noise source is typically the engine, although work-piece noise (such as dropping of materials) can also be noticeable. The noise produced at each construction stage is determined by combining the Leq contributions from each piece of equipment used at a given time, while accounting for the on-going time-variations of noise emissions (commonly referred to as the usage factor). Heavy equipment, such as a bulldozer, can have maximum, short-duration noise levels of up to 85 dBA at 50 feet. However, overall noise emissions vary considerably, depending on what specific activity is being performed at any given moment. Noise attenuation due to distance, the number and type of equipment, and the load and power requirements to accomplish tasks at each construction phase would result in different noise levels from construction activities at a given receptor. Since noise from construction equipment is intermittent and diminishes at a rate of at least 6 dB per doubling of distance (conservatively ignoring other attenuation effects from air absorption, ground effects, and/or shielding/scattering effects), the average noise levels at noise-sensitive receptors could vary considerably, because mobile construction equipment would move around the site with different loads and power requirements. Noise levels from project-related construction activities were calculated from the simultaneous use of all applicable construction equipment at spatially averaged distances (i.e., from the acoustical center of the general construction site) to the property line of the THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-60 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT nearest receptors. Although construction may occur across the entire phase area, the area around the center of construction activities best represents the potential average construction-related noise levels at the various sensitive receptors. The expected construction equipment mix was estimated and categorized by construction activity using the Federal Highway Administration Roadway Construction Noise Model. The associated, aggregate sound levels—grouped by construction activity—are summarized in Table 4-7. TABLE 4-7 PROJECT-RELAT ED CONSTRUCTION NOISE, ENERGY-AVERAGE (LEQ) SOUND LEVELS, DBA Construction Activity Phase Sound Level at Various Distances from Construction Activities, dBA Leq Residences (East) 225 feeta Cupertino Hotel (South) 150 feeta Demolition 72.7 76.2 Site Preparation 70.5 74.0 Grading 72.7 76.2 Building Construction 69.1 72.6 Paving 72.4 75.9 Architectural Coating 60.6 64.1 Note: a As measured from the acoustical center of the construction site to the nearest property line Construction activities would increase noise levels at and near the proposed area of improvements. The highest expected construction-related noise levels—up to approximately 76 dBA Leq—would occur at the Cupertino Hotel to the south during the paving, demolition, and grading phases, which would be less than the 80-dBA limit in the CMC. However, construction noise levels would create a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project. This would be considered a potentially significant impact. With implementation of Mitigation Measure NOISE-1, project-related construction noise impacts to the surrounding hotel and residences would be less than significant. Impact NOISE-1: The proposed project could result in the generation of a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project during the construction phase that would be in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or in other applicable local, State, or federal standards. Mitigation Measure NOISE-1: The following shall be incorporated in all demolition, grading, and construction plans, as required by the Cupertino Municipal Code (CMC). Construction activities shall take place only during daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, and 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekends. In addition, the construction crew shall adhere to the following best management practices shall be observed:  At least 90 days prior to the start of any construction, demolition or grading activities, all offsite businesses and residents within 300 feet of the project site will be notified of the planned activities. The notification will include a brief description of the project, the activities that would occur, the hours when activity would occur, and the construction period’s overall duration. The THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-61 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT notification should include the telephone numbers of the contractor’s authorized representatives that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint.  The project applicant and contractors shall prepare and submit a Construction Noise Control Plan to the City’s Building Department and Code Enforcement for review and approval prior to issuance of any grading, demolition, and/or building permits. The Construction Noise Plan shall demonstrate compliance with the 80-dBA limit in the CMC. The details of the Construction Noise Control Plan, including those details listed herein, shall be included as part of the permit application drawing set and as part of the construction drawing set, shall be implemented by the on-site Construction Manager, and shall include, but not be limited to, the following available controls to comply with the 80 dBA performance standard: • At least 10 days prior to the start of construction activities, a sign will be posted at the entrance(s) to the job site, clearly visible to the public, which includes permitted construction days and hours, as well as the telephone numbers of the City’s and contractor’s authorized representatives that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint. If the authorized contractor’s representative receives a complaint, he/she will investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action to the City. • During the entire active construction period, equipment and trucks used for project construction will utilize the best available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment re-design, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds), wherever feasible. • Include noise control requirements for equipment and tools, including concrete saws, to the maximum extent feasible. Such requirements could include, but are not limited to, erecting temporary plywood noise barriers between areas where concrete saws will be used and nearby sensitive receptors; performing work in a manner that minimizes noise; and undertaking the noisiest activities during times of least disturbance to nearby sensitive receptors. • During the entire active construction period, stationary noise sources will be located as far from sensitive receptors as possible, and they will be muffled and enclosed within temporary sheds, or insulation barriers or other measures will be incorporated to the extent feasible. • During the entire active construction period, noisy operations will be conducted simultaneously to the degree feasible in order to reduce the time periods of these operations. • Select haul routes that avoid the greatest amount of sensitive use areas and submit to the City of Cupertino Public Works Department for approval prior to the start of the construction phase. • Signs will be posted at the job site entrance(s), within the on-site construction zones, and along queueing lanes (if any) to reinforce the prohibition of unnecessary engine idling. All other equipment will be turned off if not in use for more than 5 minutes. • During the entire active construction period and to the extent feasible, the use of noise producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells will be for safety warning purposes only. The construction manager will use smart back-up alarms, which automatically THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-62 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT adjust the alarm level based on the background noise level or switch off back-up alarms and replace with human spotters in compliance with all safety requirements and laws. Project-Related Operational Noise Stationary Noise Noise from sources such as people talking, employees using outdoor common areas, or property maintenance may also contribute to the total noise environment within the direct vicinity of the proposed project site. However, these are commonly associated with commercial uses that already exist on the project site. As explained above, noise sources associated with landscape maintenance activities is exempted from the provisions of the CMC, provided said activities take place between the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, and 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekends and holidays. Therefore, impacts from occasional property maintenance activities associated with the proposed project would be less than significant. The exterior mechanical and HVAC equipment associated with the proposed use are expected to be similar to the equipment at surrounding commercial, multi-family residential, and hotel uses. Typical HVAC units range from approximately 70 to 75 dBA Leq at a distance of 3 feet. Future mechanical equipment associated with the proposed hotel would be located at least 215 feet from the nearest residential receptors (Aviare Apartments to the east). At this distance, the sound pressure level associated with a common central air conditioning unit would be reduced to approximately 38 dBA or less. Future mechanical equipment associated with the proposed hotel would be located at least 60 feet from the nearest non-residential receptor (commercial uses to the west). At this distance, the sound pressure level associated with a common central air conditioning unit would be reduced to approximately 49 dBA or less. Thus, the noise level associated with future central air conditioning units would be below the requirements of CMC Section 10.48.040, limiting nighttime noise to 50 dBA at nearby residential uses and to 55 dBA at non-residential commercial uses. In addition, the rooftop mechanical equipment would be within enclosures (see Figure 3-8), which would further attenuate the sound emanating from the mechanical equipment. In addition, an emergency backup generator is proposed on the roof inside an enclosure. It is anticipated that the generator would be power rated at 275 kilowatt (kW) and would only be used during an emergency power outage or for routine testing (up to 50 hours per year per BAAQMD regulations). A typical 275 kW generator with a weatherproof enclosure would produce noise levels of approximately 84 dBA at a distance of 23 feet. With a Level II sound attenuation enclosure, a typical 275 kW generator would produce noise levels of approximately 75 dBA at a distance of 23 feet. The proposed six-foot metal rooftop panel, shown in Figure 3-8, would provide additional shielding, as might the roof itself depending upon the final design. However, to provide a conservative assessment of operational noise impacts, these project features were not factored into the estimated noise level at nearby receptors since the height of the exhaust/enclosure is unknown at this time. At the nearest non-residential receptor (commercial uses to the west), noise levels would be reduced to approximately 76 dBA with a weatherproof enclosure and THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-63 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 67 dBA with a Level II sound enclosure. In both cases, this would potentially exceed the CMC daytime noise limit of 65 dBA. The commercial uses to the west would not be any more sensitive during nighttime hours than daytime hours. At the nearest residential receptors (Aviare Apartments 150 feet to the east), noise levels would be reduced to approximately 65 dBA with a weatherproof enclosure and 56 dBA with a Level II sound enclosure. In both cases, this would potentially exceed the CMC nighttime noise limit of 50 dBA for residential receptors. Therefore, this impact would be potentially significant. With implementation of Mitigation Measure NOISE-2, project-related operational noise impacts would be less than significant. Impact NOISE-2: The proposed project could result in the generation of a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project during the operation phase that would be in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or in other applicable local, State, or federal standards. Mitigation Measure NOISE-2: Mechanical equipment shall be selected and designed to reduce impacts on surrounding uses to meet the Cupertino Municipal Code noise limits of 60 dBA and 50 dBA at residential uses during daytime and nighttime, respectively, and 65 dBA and 55 dBA at non-residential sensitive uses (i.e., the Cupertino Hotel) during daytime and nighttime, respectively. A qualified acoustical consultant shall be retained to review mechanical noise as these systems are selected to determine specific noise reduction measures necessary to reduce noise to comply with the City’s noise level requirements. Mechanical equipment shall be selected and designed to reduce impacts on surrounding uses to meet the City’s noise level requirements. Noise reduction measures could include, but are not limited to:  Selection of equipment that emits low noise levels;  Installation of noise dampening techniques, such as enclosures and parapet walls, to block the line-of-sight between the noise source and the nearest receptors;  Locating equipment in less noise-sensitive areas, where feasible. Traffic Noise The peak hour traffic volumes along roadways in the project area were used to analyze traffic noise increases due to the proposed project. To determine the permanent traffic noise level increase, the Existing Plus Project peak hour traffic volumes were compared to the Existing traffic volumes. The permanent noise level increase was estimated to be 0.1 dBA on study roadway segments. To determine the cumulative traffic noise level increase, the Cumulative Plus Project traffic volumes 112 were compared to the Existing traffic volumes. The permanent noise level increase was estimated to be 2.0 dBA or less on study roadway segments. A noise level increase of 3 dBA Ldn/CNEL is considered barely perceptible in outdoor environments and would represent a potentially significant noise increase. Because the permanent noise level increase due to project-generated traffic increase at the surrounding noise- sensitive receptors would be less than 3 dBA, the proposed project would not cause a substantial 112 Cumulative Plus Project traffic volumes were obtained from the Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Transportation Impact Analysis, May 22, 2018. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-64 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT permanent noise level increase at the surrounding noise-sensitive receptors and would have a less-than- significant impact. b) Would the project expose people to or generate excessive groundborne vibration or ground borne noise levels? Operational Vibration Operation of the proposed project would not generate substantial levels of vibration because there are no notable sources of vibrational energy associated with the project, such as industrial machinery or railroad operations. Thus, operation of the proposed project would not result in less than significant groundborne vibration impacts. Construction Vibration Construction activities generate varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the construction procedures, construction equipment used, and proximity to vibration-sensitive uses. The generation of vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibrations at moderate levels, to slight damage at the highest levels. Table 4-8 lists reference vibration levels for different types of commonly used construction equipment. TABLE 4-8 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT VIBRATION LEVELS Equipment Approximate PPV Velocity at 25 Feet (in/sec) Vibratory Roller 0.210 Large Bulldozer 0.089 Loaded Trucks 0.076 Jackhammer 0.035 Small Bulldozer 0.003 Note: Source: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), 2018. Proposed construction would include grading, which would include equipment such as loaders. Paving activities may also generate high levels of construction vibration and would include equipment such as pavers and rollers. Using the vibration source level of construction equipment provided in Table 4-8 and the construction vibration assessment guidelines published by the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA), the vibration impacts associated with the proposed project were assessed in terms of potential architectural damage due to vibration. The City does not have specific, vibration-related standards. Thus, project-related construction vibration was evaluated for its potential to cause minor architectural damage based on FTA ’s architectural damage criteria. The term ‘architectural damage’ is defined as minor surface cracks (in plaster, drywall, tile, or THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-65 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT stucco) or the sticking of doors and windows. This is below the severity of ‘structural damage’ which entails the compromising of structural soundness or the threatening the basic integrity of the building shell. Building damage is typically not a concern for most projects, with the occasional exception of blasting and pile driving during construction. No blasting, pile driving, or hard rock ripping/crushing activities would be required during project construction. Since vibration-induced architectural damage could result from an instantaneous vibration event, distances are measured from the receptor facade to the nearest location of potential construction activities. Table 4-9 shows the vibration levels from typical earthmoving construction equipment at the nearest receptors. For reference, a peak particle velocity (PPV) of 0.2 inches/second (in/sec) is used as the threshold for “non-engineered timber and masonry buildings” (which would apply to the surrounding structures). Small construction equipment generates vibration levels less than 0.1 PPV in/sec at 25 feet away. TABLE 4-9 ARCHITECTURAL DAMAGE VIBRATION LEVELS FROM CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Equipment Peak Particle Velocity in inches per second Residences (East) 160 feet Commercial (West) 50 feet Cupertino Inn (South) 75 feet Vibratory Rollera 0.01 0.07 0.04 Large Bulldozer 0.01 0.03 0.02 Loaded Trucks 0.01 0.03 0.02 Jackhammer <0.01 0.01 0.01 Small Bulldozer <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 Notes: Distances are from the nearest portion of potential construction activity to the nearest receptor building within each land use type. a. This analysis shows a “vibratory roller”, which may be more vibration-intensive than the roller used during the paving phase Source: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2018. Construction-generated vibration levels at the nearest receptors would be less than the 0.02 in/sec PPV vibration damage criteria for “non-engineered timber and masonry buildings,” per FTA guidelines. Impacts related to architectural damage due to construction vibration would be less than significant and mitigation is not necessary. c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The proposed project is not located within an airport land use plan or within 2 miles of an airport. The nearest aviation facility is the Moffett Federal Airfield, approximately 4.75 miles to the northwest. At this distance from the aviation facilities, the proposed project would not expose residents or patrons to THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-66 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT excessive noise levels from aircraft noise. No impacts related to noise from public or private airports or strips would occur and no mitigation measures are necessary. XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth or growth for which inadequate planning has occurred, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?     b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?     GENERAL PLAN EIR As discussed in Chapter 4.11, Population and Housing, of the General Plan EIR, impacts were determined to be less than significant as a result of intensified development of the project site. The General Plan would introduce approximately 16,855 new jobs113 to Cupertino. These new jobs combined with existing conditions would result in 44,242 jobs at the 2040 buildout horizon. The proposed project is anticipated to be completed by 2022. As discussed in the General Plan EIR, according to the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), Cupertino is projected to have 62,500 residents and 30,110 jobs by 2020 and 66,800 residents and 31,370 jobs by 2030. EXISTING CONDITIONS There is no population on-site, because the site is currently developed with commercial uses. The existing building is currently occupied with a Goodyear Tire, which provides new tires, tire repairs, oil changes, and other automotive care services and provides about 10 jobs.114 113 Jobs are calculated applying the City’s generation rates as follows; 4,040,231 square feet of office allocation divided by 300 square feet equals 13,467 jobs; 1,343,679 square feet of commercial allocation divided by 450 square feet equals 2,986 jobs; and 1,339 hotel rooms at .3 jobs per room equals 402 jobs for a total of 16,855 jobs. 114 Personal communication between PlaceWorks and Goodyear Auto Service Center on January 9, 2019. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-67 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT DISCUSSION a) Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth or growth for which inadequate planning has occurred, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? The proposed project would construct a 156-room hotel and would not directly result in any additional new population growth or employment growth beyond what was accounted for in the General Plan. Persons staying temporarily in a place, such as the proposed hotel, are not considered permanent residents. Thus, the proposed project would not directly increase permanent population through guests at the hotel. In addition, the proposed project is not a regionally significant employer, and it is anticipated that future employees of the proposed project would come from Cupertino and the surrounding Bay Area communities. Therefore, the proposed project would not create any demand for housing built elsewhere resulting in a physical impact to the environment. The project would be required to contribute to the City’s Below Market Rate (BMR) housing mitigation fee program, prior to issuance of construction permits.115 The construction of any BMR housing would undergo its own environmental review and clearance through a separate process. As described in Chapter 3, Project Description, of this Initial Study, the operation of the project is estimated to generate up to 78 employees on the project site. As described in the discussion of Existing Conditions, above, the existing automotive service center on the site has 10 employees, resulting in about 68 net new employees on the site. According to the ABAG, Cupertino is projected to have 30,110 jobs by 2020 and 31,370 jobs by 2030, which is about the time project would be completed (i.e., 2022). The estimated 68 net new jobs generated by project operation would be well within forecast employment increases in Cupertino. The proposed project’s potential impact on growth from new employment would be less than significant. In addition, the proposed project does not include the construction of infrastructure or roads which would indirectly induce additional population growth. Therefore, the project would have a less-than- significant impact due to inducement of unplanned growth. No mitigation measures would be required. b) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? The project site does not contain any residential units and would not displace housing. Therefore, the project would have no impact associated with the displacement of substantial numbers of housing. 115 City of Cupertino, Housing Division. 2015. City of Cupertino Below Market Rate (BMR) Housing Mitigation Program Procedural Manual. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-68 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection?     ii) Police protection?     iii) Schools?     iv) Libraries?     GENERAL PLAN EIR As discussed in Chapter 4.12, Public Services and Recreation, of the General Plan EIR, impacts were determined to be less than significant as a result of intensified development of the project site. EXISTING CONDITIONS The public service providers for the project site are as follows:  The City of Cupertino contracts with the Santa Clara County Fire District (SCCFD) for fire protection, emergency, medical, and hazardous material services.  The City of Cupertino contracts with the Santa Clara County Sheriff’s Office (Sheriff’s Office) and West Valley Patrol Division for police protection services.  The project site is within the Cupertino Union School District.  The Santa Clara County Library District governs and administers seven community libraries, one branch library, two bookmobiles, the Home Service Library, and the 24-7 online library for all library users. The closest library to the project site is the Cupertino Library located at 10800 Torre Avenue in Cupertino. A relevant discussion of the existing conditions for each of these service providers is provided in Chapter 4.12 of the General Plan EIR. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-69 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT DISCUSSION a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: fire protection, police protection, schools, and libraries? The primary purpose of the public services impact analysis is to examine the impacts associated with physical improvements to public service facilities required to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives. Public service facilities may need improvements (i.e., construction, renovation or expansion) as demand for services increase. Increased demand is typically driven by increases in population. The proposed project would have a significant environmental impact if it would exceed the ability of public service providers to adequately serve residents, thereby requiring construction of new facilities or modification of existing facilities. As discussed above in Section XII, Population and Housing, above, the proposed project would result in a 156-room hotel and no new permanent residents. The proposed project is within the 1,339-hotel-room maximum evaluated in the General Plan EIR and would not directly result in any additional new population growth or employment growth beyond what was accounted for in the General Plan EIR. Because impacts to public service providers were determined to be less than significant in the General Plan EIR and the proposed project is within the number of hotel rooms evaluated in the General Plan EIR, impacts to public services providers as a result of the proposed project would also be less than significant. No mitigation measures would be required. Furthermore, the property tax generated from the proposed hotel would support the City’s public services funds that are used in part to maintain some City services. Likewise, and pursuant to SB 50,116 the project applicant would be required to pay the school impact fees required for commercial development, and any impacts to the Cupertino Union School District would be less than significant. XIV. PARKS AND RECREATION Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?     116 SB 50 amended California Government Code Section 65995, which contains limitations on Education Code Section 17620, the statute that authorizes school districts to assess development fees within school district boundaries. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-70 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact b) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered park and recreational facilities, or result in the need for new or physically altered park and recreational facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts?     GENERAL PLAN EIR As discussed in Chapter 4.12, Public Services and Recreation, of the General Plan EIR, impacts were determined to be less than significant as a result of intensified development of the project site. The General Plan EIR evaluates a project that is greater than that of the proposed project. EXISTING CONDITIONS The City of Cupertino Recreation and Community Services is responsible for the maintenance of the City’s 16 parks, five special use sites, nine school sports fields, and 3 trail corridors.117 The City of Cupertino has an adopted parkland dedication standard of three acres of parkland for every 1,000 residents. There is a total of approximately 224 acres of parkland in Cupertino, or approximately 3.8 acres per 1,000 residents, based on an existing population of 58,302. The closest neighborhood park is Franco Park approximately 0.5 miles to the west. Regional park facilities operated by the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (MROSD) and the Santa Clara County Parks could be used by guests of the proposed project. The closest MROSD parks to Cupertino are the Fremont Older, Picchetti Ranch, and Rancho San Antonia, which are located just southwest and west of the city boundaries, respectively. Santa Clara County Park facilities that serve Cupertino include Rancho San Antonio County Park, south of I-280 and west of Foothill Boulevard, and the Stevens Creek County Park. DISCUSSION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? The proposed project would increase the number of persons and level of activity of the project site; however, no families with children or other permanent residents that are assumed to frequently use the existing neighborhood and regional parks would be introduced as a result of the proposed hotel. Accordingly, the project is not expected to significantly increase the use of any existing neighborhood and 117 Draft City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation System Master Plan. 2019. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-71 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT regional parks, or other recreational facilities and no new facilities would be required to meet the demand. As described above in Section XII, Population and Housing, the estimated 78 employees would likely be residents of Cupertino or the surrounding Bay Area and would not relocate from other locations thereby generating new population to the city. The proposed project would construct a 156-room hotel, which is within the 1,339-hotel-room maximum evaluated in the General Plan EIR and would not directly result in any additional new population growth or employment growth beyond what was accounted for in the General Plan EIR. Because impacts to parks were determined to be less than significant in the General Plan EIR and the proposed project is within the number of hotel rooms evaluated in the General Plan EIR, impacts to parks and recreational services as a result of the proposed project would also be less than significant. No mitigation measures would be required. Furthermore, the Transient Occupancy Tax generated from the proposed hotel would support the City’s public services funds that are used in part to maintain the City’s recreational facilities. b) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered park and recreational facilities, or result in the need for new or physically altered park and recreational facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts? As discussed in criterion (a) above, unlike permanent residents in Cupertino, future patrons of the hotel are not expected to use park and recreational facilities, therefore the proposed project would not result in substantial deterioration or cause the need for construction of new built facilities beyond the facilities accounted for in the long-range planning completed for the regional park facilities of the project site. The Transient Occupancy Tax generated from the proposed hotel would also support the City’s public services funds that are used in part to maintain the City’s recreational facilities. Because impacts to parks were determined to be less than significant in the General Plan EIR and the proposed project is within the number of hotel rooms evaluated in the General Plan EIR, impacts to parks and recreational services as a result of the proposed project would also be less than significant. No mitigation measures would be required. XV. TRANSPORTATION Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact a) Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?     b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?     THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-72 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?     d) Result in inadequate emergency access?     GENERAL PLAN EIR As discussed in Chapter 4.13, Transportation and Circulation, of the General Plan EIR, traffic impacts were found to be significant and unavoidable. Implementation of General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure TRAF-1 requires the City to commit to preparing and implementing a Transportation Mitigation Fee Program to guarantee funding for roadway and infrastructure improvements that are necessary to mitigate impacts from future projects based on the then current City standards. General Plan EIR Mitigation Measure TRAF- 1, which was previously adopted by the City and incorporated into the General Plan, will be implemented by the City. METHODOLOGY The following is based on the Transp ortation Impact Analysis (TIA) dated June 13, 2019 prepared for the proposed project. The TIA is included in Appendix D, Transportation Impact Analysis, of this Initial Study. The cumulative impacts of the project together with overall General Plan buildout through year 2040 were evaluated as part of the General Plan EIR. Accordingly, this Initial Study evaluates the project’s near- term traffic impacts under the Background conditions when compared to Existing conditions. The TIA was prepared to satisfy the requirements of CEQA and following the guidelines of the City of Cupertino and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), the congestion management agency for Santa Clara County. The VTA Congestion Management Program (CMP) TIA Guidelines (last updated in October 2014) are guidelines for assessing the transportation impacts of development projects and identifying whether improvements are needed to adjacent roadways, bike facilities, sidewalks, and transit services affected by the proposed project. The TIA guidelines have been adopted by local agencies within Santa Clara County, and are applied to analyze the regional transportation system. For projects that would generate fewer than 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips, a CMP analysis is not required. Based on trip generation rates recommended by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (2017), it is estimated that the proposed project would generate 1,562 net new daily vehicle trips, with 73 net new trips occurring during the AM (morning) peak hour and 87 net new trips occurring during the PM (evening) peak hour. Accordingly, a CMP analysis is not required because the propose project would generate fewer than 100 net new peak hour trips. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-73 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Significant Impact Criteria For the purposes of this Initial Study, the criteria used to determine significant impacts on signalized intersections are based on the City’s level of service standards, also referred to as “LOS” when accompanied by a qualitative description of operating conditions ranging from LOS “A”, or free-flow conditions with little or no delay, to LOS “F”, or jammed conditions with excessive delays. Since the level of service standards for all signalized intersections within the City of Cupertino are more stringent than the CMP level of service standard, a separate CMP intersection analysis according to the CMP methodology was not necessary. Definition of Significant Intersection Impacts A project is said to create a significant adverse impact on traffic conditions at a signalized intersection in the city of Cupertino if for either AM or PM peak hour: 1. The level of service at the intersection under background conditions drops below its level of service standard when project traffic is added, or 2. The level of service at the intersection operates below its level of service standard under background conditions, and the addition of project traffic causes both the critical-movement delay at the intersection to increase by four (4) or more seconds and the volume-to-capacity ratio (V/C) to increase by one percent (0.01) or more. An exception to this criterion 2 above applies when the addition of project traffic reduces the amount of average delay for critical movements (i.e., the change in average delay for critical movements is negative). In this case, the threshold of significance is an increase in the critical V/C value by 1 percent (0.01) or more. Intersection Level of Service Signalized Study Intersections The City of Cupertino evaluates level of service at signalized intersections based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual level of service methodology using TRAFFIX software. This method evaluates signalized intersection operations on the basis of average control delay time for all vehicles at the intersection. The correlation between average control delay and level of service at signalized intersections is shown in Table 4-10. The City of Cupertino’s level of service standard for signalized intersections is LOS D or better. For the study intersection of De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard, the level of service standard is LOS E+ or better. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-74 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT TABLE 4-10 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS BASED ON CONTROL DELAY Level of Service Description Average Control Delay (seconds per vehicle) A Signal progression is extremely favorable. Most Vehicles are during the green phase and do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to the very low vehicle delay. 10.0 or less B+ B- B- Operations characterized by good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than with LOS A, causing higher levels of average vehicle delay. 10.1 to 12.0 12.1 to 18.0 18.1 to 20.0 C+ C+ C- Higher delays may result from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, though may still pass through the intersection without stopping. 20.1 to 23.0 23.1 to 32.0 32.1 to 35.0 D+ D+ D- The influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable signal progression, long cycle lengths, or high volume-to-capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. 35.1 to 39.0 39.1 to 51.0 51.1 to 55.0 E+ E+ E- This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor signal progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume-to- capacity ratios. Individual cycle failures occur frequently. 55.1 to 60.0 60.1 to 75.0 75.1 to 80.0 F This level of delay is considered unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation, that is, when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contribution causes of such delay levels. greater than 80.0 Source: Transportation Research Board, 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (Washington, D.C., 2000) page 10 to 16. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Traffic Level of Service Analysis Guidelines (June 2003), Table 2. See Table 1 of the Transportation Impact Analysis prepared for the proposed project by Hexagon Transportation Consultants. CMP Intersections The designated level of service methodology for the CMP is also the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual operations method for signalized intersections, using TRAFFIX. The CMP level of service standard for signalized intersections is LOS E or better. However, the CMP level of service standard for signalized intersections within City of Cupertino for all signalized intersections, including CMP intersections, is LOS D or better. As previously state, the level-of-service standard for the study intersection of De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard is LOS E+ or better. Intersection Queuing The analysis of intersection level of service was supplemented with an analysis of traffic operations for intersections where the project would add a significant number of left turns. The operations analysis is based on vehicle queuing for high demand left-turn movements at intersections. Vehicle queues were estimated using a Poisson probability distribution, which estimates the probability of the number of vehicles for a vehicle movement to determine the average number of vehicles in the queue per lane. The basis of the analysis is as follows: (1) the Poisson probability distribution is used to estimate the 95th THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-75 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT percentile maximum number of queued vehicles per signal cycle for a particular movement; (2) the estimated maximum number of vehicles in the queue is translated into a queue length, assuming 25 feet per vehicle; and (3) the estimated maximum queue length is compared to the existing or planned available storage capacity for the movement. This analysis thus provides a basis for estimating future turn pocket storage requirements at signalized intersections. The 95th percentile queue length value indicates that during the peak hour, a queue of this length or less would occur on 95 percent of the signal cycles. Or, a queue length longer than the 95th percentile queue would only occur on 5 percent of the signal cycles (about 3 cycles during the peak hour for a signal with a 60-second cycle length). Therefore, left-turn storage pocket designs based on the 95th percentile queue length would ensure that storage space would be exceeded only 5 percent of the time. The 95th percentile queue length is also known as the “design queue length.” EXISTING WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS The existing conditions without the proposed project for intersections, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, as well as transit services are discussed below. Existing without Project Intersection Operations The results of the intersection level-of-service analysis show that all but one of the study intersections currently operate at LOS D or better during both the AM and PM peak hours of traffic. Therefore, all the study intersections are currently operating at acceptable levels of service. The results of the level-of- service analysis for Existing without Project Conditions are presented in Table 4-11. TABLE 4-11 EXISTING WITHOUT PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE ID # Intersection Jurisdiction/ CMPa LOS Threshold Peak Hourb Delay LOS 1 North De Anza Boulevard / Homestead Road Cupertino (CMP) D AM PM 37.2 38.7 D+ D+ 2 North De Anza Boulevard /I-280 North Ramps Cupertino (CMP) D AM PM 21.9 35.5 C+ D+ 3 North De Anza Boulevard / I-280 South Ramps Cupertino (CMP) C AM PM 22.4 21.4 C+ C+ 4 North De Anza Boulevard /Mariani Avenue Cupertino D AM PM 37.4 39.0 D+ D+ 5 North De Anza Boulevard /Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino (CMP) E+ AM PM 35.5 43.7 D+ D Notes: All of the study intersections are signalized. a. Intersection jurisdiction and identification of CMP (Congestion Management Program) intersections. b. AM = morning peak hour, PM = evening peak hour. Source: See Table 3 of the Transportation Impact Analysis prepared for the proposed project by Hexagon Transportation Consultants, June 2019. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-76 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Existing without Project Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Facilities Pedestrian Facilities Pedestrian facilities consist of sidewalks, crosswalks, and pedestrian signals at signalized intersections. In the vicinity of the project site, sidewalks exist along both sides of North De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road, providing pedestrian access to and from the project site. The project site can be accessed via the parking lot of the adjacent Homestead Square Shopping Center. Marked crosswalks with pedestrian signal heads and push buttons are provided on all approaches of the signalized study intersections, except the south leg of the North De Anza Boulevard /I-280 northbound ramps intersection and the north leg of the North De Anza Boulevard /I-280 southbound ramps intersection. Although some crosswalk connections are missing, the overall network of sidewalks and crosswalks in the study area has adequate connectivity and provides pedestrians with safe routes to transit services and other points of interest in the vicinity of the project site. The 2018 Cupertino Pedestrian Transportation Plan (Pedestrian Plan) contains goals, policies, and specific recommendations to increase the walkability of Cupertino, including the Pedestrian Guidelines. The Pedestrian Plan is a companion document to the City of Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan (discussed below). It includes specific recommendations to improve pedestrian conditions. Consistent with the Pedestrian Plan and any other applicable recommendations, the project applicant would be required to contribute to implementing any recommended pedestrian improvements in the project area. Bicycle Facilities The bicycle facilities in the study area are Class II bicycle lanes. Class II Bikeways (Bike Lanes) are lanes for bicyclists generally adjacent to the outer vehicle travel lanes. These lanes have special lane markings, pavement legends, and signage. Bicycle lanes are generally 5 feet wide. Adjacent vehicle parking and vehicle/pedestrian crossflow are permitted. Bike lanes in the area include the following:  North-south bicycle connections in the study area include striped bike lanes along North De Anza Boulevard between Stevens Creek Boulevard and Homestead Road, where they continue into Sunnyvale.  East-west bicycle connections in the study area consist of striped bike lanes along Homestead Road between Lafayette Street and Foothill Expressway, Mariani Avenue east of North De Anza Road, and Stevens Creek Boulevard between Lawrence Expressway and California Oak Way. In 2016, the City of Cupertino adopted its Bicycle Transportation Master Plan (Bike Plan), which is a citywide plan to encourage bicycling as a safe, practical and healthy alternative to the use of the family car. The Bike Plan illustrates Cupertino’s current bicycle network, identifies gaps in the network, and THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-77 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT proposes improvement projects to address the identified gaps.118 The Bike Plan includes standards for engineering, encouragement, education, and enforcement intended to improve the bicycle infrastructure in the city to enable people to bike to work and school, to utilize a bicycle to run errands, and to enjoy the health and environmental benefits that bicycling provides cyclists of every age. The VTA adopted the Santa Clara Countywide Bicycle Plan (CBP). The CBP guides the development of major bicycle facilities in the County by identifying Cross County Bicycle Corridors and other bicycle projects of countywide or intercity significance. There are no Cross-County Bicycle Corridors in the project vicinity. Public Transportation Facilities Transit Service Nearby transit services are described below, and Table 4-12 summarizes the destinations, closest stop to the project site, hours/days of operation, and service frequencies for transit services within walking distance. TABLE 4-12 EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICE Routes From To Distance to Nearest Stop Weekdays Operating Hoursa Peak Headwayb VTA Local Bus Routes 55 De Anza College Great America Parkway 0.10 miles (500 feet) 5:38 am to 10:54 pm 15 to 35 minutes depending on the stop and direction 81 Moffett Field/Ames Center San Jose State University 0.10 miles (500 feet) 6:06 am to 9:04 pm 25 to 35 minutes depending on the stop and direction Notes: AM = morning commuter period; PM = evening commute period; VTA = Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority a. Operating hours consider earliest and latest stop at each bus lines closest stop to the project site. b. Headways are defined as the time interval between two transit vehicles traveling in the same direction over the same route. Source: Transportation Impact Analysis, Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. June 2019. 118 City of Cupertino, 2016 Bicycle Transportation Plan, Figure 3-7: Bikeway projects. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-78 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Commuter Rail Service Caltrain is a commuter heavy rail service that runs from downtown San Francisco (4th and King Streets) to downtown San Jose (Diridon Station), with a limited number of commute period trains running farther south to Gilroy. During commute periods, Caltrain offers express service (“Baby Bullet”) between downtown San Jose and San Francisco. Currently, Baby Bullet service is provided both in the northbound and southbound directions during the morning and evening commute periods at the Mountain View Caltrain station. Baby Bullet trains serve the Sunnyvale Caltrain station in the northbound direction during the morning peak and in the southbound direction during the evening peak. The nearest station to the project site is the Lawrence Station, which is located on Lawrence Expressway approximately 4 miles northwest of the project site. During the weekdays, service in the northbound direction begins at 4:40 a.m. and ends at 10:40 p.m. In the southbound direction, service at this station begins at 6:14 a.m. and ends at 1:20 a.m. During the weekends, northbound service begins at 7:10 a.m. and ends at 10:40 p.m. Southbound service begins at 9:40 a.m. and ends at 1:26 a.m. For passengers arriving by bicycle, there are 18 bike racks and 24 bicycle lockers. Vehicle parking at this location includes 122 parking spaces. BACKGROUND WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS This section describes the background traffic conditions without the proposed project. The background traffic conditions are defined as conditions just prior to completion of the proposed project. Traffic volumes for background conditions comprise volumes from existing traffic volumes plus traffic generated by other approved developments in the vicinity of the site. The transportation network under background conditions would be the same as the existing transportation network because there are no planned and funded transportation improvements at the study intersections. Background peak hour traffic volumes were estimated by adding to existing traffic volumes the trips generated by nearby approved but not yet completed or occupied projects in the cities of Cupertino and Sunnyvale. Trip generation estimates for the approved projects were based on their respective traffic studies, if available, and on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip rates. Background without Project Intersection Operations As shown in Table 4-13, the results of the level-of-service analysis show that most of the study intersections would continue to operate at LOS D or better during both the AM and PM peak hours of traffic under Background without Project conditions. The intersection level-of-service calculation sheets are provided in Appendix D of the TIA, which is included in Appendix D of this Initial Study. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-79 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT TABLE 4-13 BACKGROUND WITHOUT PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ID # Intersection Jurisdiction/ CMPa LOS Threshold Peak Hourb Existing Conditions Background Conditions Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 North De Anza Boulevard / Homestead Road Cupertino (CMP) D AM PM 37.2 38.7 D+ D+ 37.8 39.5 D+ D 2 North De Anza Boulevard /I-280 North Ramps Cupertino (CMP) D AM PM 21.9 35.5 C+ D+ 21.9 36.1 C+ D+ 3 North De Anza Boulevard / I-280 South Ramps Cupertino (CMP) C AM PM 22.4 21.4 C+ C+ 23.0 21.7 C+ C+ 4 North De Anza Boulevard /Mariani Avenue Cupertino D AM PM 37.4 39.0 D+ D+ 37.4 39.0 D+ D 5 North De Anza Boulevard /Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino (CMP) E+ AM PM 35.5 43.7 D+ D 35.9 44.6 D+ D Notes: All of the study intersections are signalized. a. Intersection jurisdiction and identification of CMP (Congestion Management Program) intersections. b. AM = morning peak hour, PM = evening peak hour. Source: See Table 4 of the Transportation Impact Analysis prepared for the proposed project by Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc., June 2019. DISCUSSION a) Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Roadways After applying the ITE trip rates for hotels, appropriate trip reductions for being within walking distance of services at Homestead Square Shopping Center and implementation of a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program with dedicated shuttle provisions as well as trip credits for the existing uses (Goodyear Tire), the proposed hotel project would generate 1,562 net new daily vehicle trips, with 73 new trips occurring during the AM peak hour and 87 new trips occurring during the PM peak hour. Using the inbound/outbound splits contained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, the project would produce 42 new inbound and 31 new outbound trips during the AM peak hour, and 44 new inbound and 43 new outbound trips during the PM peak hour. A summary of the project’s trip generation is shown in Table 4- 14 below. Project trips were assigned to the roadway network based on the estimated trip distribution patterns presented in Figure 8 of the TIA. The net project trip assignment at the study intersections is shown on Figure 9 of the TIA. The impact criteria presented below focuses on roadway system operations and its effects on users, including drivers, pedestrians, bicyclists, transit passengers, and first responders in emergency access vehicles. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-80 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT TABLE 4-14 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Land Use Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Rate Trips Rate In Out Total Rate In Out Total Proposed Uses Hotel with 156 roomsa 12.23 1,908 0.62 56 41 97 0.73 56 58 114 Hotel and Retail Internal Mixed-Use Reduction (10%)b -191 -6 -4 -10 -6 -5 -11 TDM Reduction for Shuttle Program (3%)c -57 -2 -1 -3 -2 -2 -4 Subtotal 1,660 48 36 84 48 51 99 Existing Uses Goodyear Tire (8,323 square feet)c -98 Net Project Trips 1,562 42 31 73 44 43 87 Notes: TDM = Transportation Demand Management a. Trip generation based on average trip rates for Hotel (land use 310, Occupied Rooms) published in ITE’s Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017. b. Trip reduction based on Standard Auto Trip Reduction Rates published in VTA’s Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, 2014. c. Trip credits base on PM peak hour count conducted on July 11, 2018. Daily trips are estimated based on the ratio of daily to total AM and PM peak hour trip rates for Tire Store (ITE Land Use 848). Source: See Table 5 of the Transportation Impact Analysis prepared for the proposed project by Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc., June 2019. The following analysis was performed to evaluate traffic conditions during the weekday morning (AM) and weekday evening (PM) peak hours for the following scenarios:  Existing Plus Project Conditions. In addition to the Existing Without Project conditions discussed previously, the Existing Plus Project conditions were evaluated by adding traffic from the proposed project.  Background Plus Project Conditions. In addition to the Background Without Project conditions discussed previously, the Background Plus Project conditions were evaluated by adding traffic from the other approved developments in the vicinity of the site. Existing plus Project Conditions Intersection levels of service were calculated with the new traffic added by the project to evaluate the operating conditions of the intersections and identify potential impacts to the roadway system. The results of the intersection level-of-service calculations for Existing plus Project conditions are presented in Table 4-15. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-81 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT TABLE 4-15 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ID Intersection Jurisdiction/ CMP LOS Thresholda Peak Hourb Existing without Project Existing plus Project Delay LOS Delay LOS Increment in Critical Delay Increment in Critical V/C 1 North De Anza Boulevard/ Homestead Road Cupertino (CMP) D AM PM 37.2 338.7 D+ D+ 37.5 39.3 D+ D 0.0 1.3 0.001 0.010 2 North De Anza Boulevard/ I-280 North Ramps Cupertino (CMP) D AM PM 21.9 35.5 C+ D+ 21.8 36.0 C+ D+ 0.0 1.1 0.004 0.008 3 North De Anza Boulevard/ I-280 South Ramps Cupertino (CMP) C AM PM 22.4 21.4 C+ C+ 22.7 22.0 C+ C+ 0.5 1.4 0.007 0.012 4 North De Anza Boulevard/ Mariani Avenue Cupertino D AM PM 37.4 39.0 D+ D+ 37.4 38.9 D+ D+ 0.0 0.0 0.001 0.001 5 North De Anza Boulevard/ Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino (CMP) E+ AM PM 35.5 43.7 D+ D 35.6 43.7 D+ D 0.1 0.2 0.003 0.001 a. LOS Threshold is the lowest acceptable LOS (the threshold between acceptable and unacceptable level of service). b. AM = morning peak hour, PM = evening peak hour. Source: See Table 6 of the Transportation Impact Analysis prepared for the proposed project by Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc., June 2019. As shown on Table 4-15 the level-of-service analysis show that all the study intersections would operate at an acceptable LOS D during both the AM and PM peak hours of traffic if the proposed project were completed and operating today. However, because it would take approximately 2 years to complete the construction of the project and begin operating the hotel, the proposed project would not have any effect on the existing conditions. For this reason, impact conclusions are not drawn from the Existing plus Project scenario. The criteria that define a significant project impact at a signalized intersection in the city of Cupertino are based on comparing Background plus Project conditions to Background without Project conditions that would be in effect at the time the proposed project would operating, which is discussed below. Background plus Project Conditions The level-of-service analysis results from the Background plus Project conditions are summarized in Table 4-16. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-82 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT TABLE 4-16 BACKGROUND PLUS PROJECT INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE RESULTS ID # Intersection Jurisdiction/ CMP LOS Thresholda Peak Hourb Background without Project Conditions Background plus Project Conditions Delay LOS Delay LOS Increment in Critical Delay Increment in Critical V/C 1 North De Anza Boulevard / Homestead Road Cupertino (CMP) D AM PM 37.8 39.5 D+ D 38.2 40.2 D+ D 0.0 1.4 0.001 0.010 2 North De Anza Boulevard /I-280 North Ramps Cupertino (CMP) D AM PM 21.9 36.1 C+ D+ 21.8 36.6 C+ D+ 0.0 1.2 0.004 0.008 3 North De Anza Boulevard / I-280 South Ramps Cupertino (CMP) C AM PM 23.0 21.7 C+ C+ 23.3 22.2 C C+ 0.5 1.5 0.007 0.012 4 North De Anza Boulevard /Mariani Avenue Cupertino D AM PM 37.4 39.0 D+ D 37.4 39.0 D+ D+ 0.0 0.0 0.001 0.001 5 North De Anza Boulevard /Stevens Creek Boulevard Cupertino (CMP) E+ AM PM 35.9 44.6 D+ D 35.9 44.6 D+ D 0.1 0.0 0.003 0.001 Notes: All of the study intersections are signalized. a. LOS Threshold is the lowest acceptable LOS (the threshold between acceptable and unacceptable level of service). b. AM = morning peak hour, PM = evening peak hour. Source: See Table 7 of the Transportation Impact Analysis prepared for the proposed project by Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc., June 2019. The results presented in Table 4-16 show that all of the study intersections would continue to operate at an acceptable LOS D or better for all intersections during both the AM and PM peak hours of traffic under Background plus Project conditions. The proposed project would not cause the critical-movement delay at a CMP intersection to increase by 4 or more seconds and the V/C to increase by 1 percent (0.01) or more compared to Background plus Project conditions. Therefore, the project’s impact at all intersections is considered less than significant. Construction Traffic Demolition and construction would take place over a 2-year period, which is anticipated to begin in August 2020 and end in 2022, subject to regulatory approval. During this period, the project would generate changes to the existing transportation conditions. New traffic would be generated by construction employees and construction activities, including haul trucks. Construction traffic is temporary and would generate fewer trips than the projected trips during project operation. As discussed above, the project would not result in a significant impact at any study intersection. Pedestrian Facilities The project is expected to increase the number of pedestrians using the existing sidewalks and crosswalks in the area. The project site and surrounding uses would continue to use the existing sidewalks along both sides of North De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road. Pedestrian access via the parking lot of the adjacent Homestead Square Shopping Center would not be interrupted. The project would construct new THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-83 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT sidewalks along the north and south sides of the hotel building, connecting to the existing sidewalk along North De Anza Boulevard. The site plan shows the existing sidewalk along North De Anza Boulevard to remain 5 feet wide. The newly constructed sidewalks around the building would measure between approximately 5 feet wide and 10 feet wide. The overall network of sidewalks and crosswalks in the study area has adequate connectivity and provides pedestrians with safe routes to transit services and other points of interest in the vicinity of the project site. The project would not eliminate or impede any existing pedestrian facilities, nor would it conflict with any of the goals and policies in the City’s Pedestrian Plan. Bicycle Facilities There are existing bicycle facilities in the immediate vicinity of the project site. There are also planned bicycle facilities in the study area, including buffered bike lanes along Homestead Road and North De Anza Boulevard. The project would not remove any bicycle facilities, nor would it conflict with any adopted plans or policies for new bicycle facilities. The vehicular access to the project site would remain similar to the existing conditions and would not eliminate or impede the existing bicycle facilities. The proposed project would provide Class 1 bicycle parking spaces (bicycle lockers or secure rooms) in the subterranean parking levels. Class 2 bicycle parking spaces (publicly accessible bicycle racks) would be available for guests and employees near the main entrance. Therefore, the proposed project would not obstruct or hinder the implementation of the City’s Bike Plan and would support the use of bicycling by providing adequate bike facilities for guests and employees. Transit The project site is served by existing VTA bus routes. The closest bus stops are located within a two- minute walk (about 500 feet) to and from the project site, providing access to local bus routes 55 and 81. The VTA has not established policies or significance criteria related to transit vehicle delay. The new transit trips generated by the project are not expected to create demand in excess of the transit service that is currently provided. In summary, the proposed project would not exceed the City’s level-of-service standards for vehicular transportation, and there would be adequate availability of alternative modes of travel including pedestrian, bicycle, and transit in the project area. The proposed project would not displace modify or interfere with any transit stop, sidewalk, or bicycle lanes. In addition, the project would not generate a demand for transit that would exceed the capacity of the system. Therefore, the project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities. Accordingly, impacts would be less than significant. b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3 was added to the updated CEQA Guidelines on December 28, 2018. Section 15064.3 describes specific considerations for evaluating a project’s transportation impacts. As THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-84 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT stated in Section 15064.3(a), vehicle-miles traveled or VMT is the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts evaluated pursuant to Section 15064.3(b). VMT is a useful metric in understanding the overall effects of a project on the transportation system. VMT is the sum of all of the vehicle trips generated by a project multiplied by the lengths of their trips to and from the site on an average weekday. A vehicle driven 1 mile is 1 VMT. Therefore, a project with a higher VMT would have a greater environmental effect than a project with a low VMT. The trip lengths vary by the land use type and the trip purpose. For example, a trip from a residence to a job may be longer than the trip from a residence to a neighborhood school. The VMT values stated below represent the full length of a given trip, and are not truncated at city, county, or region boundaries. Many factors affect travel behavior and trip lengths such as density of land use, diversity of land uses, design of the transportation network, distance to high-quality transit, and demographics. Low-density development separated from other land uses and located in areas with poor access to transit generates more automobile travel and higher VMT compared to development located in urban areas with more access to transit. While the updated CEQA Guidelines were approved on December 28, 2018, cities and other agencies have an opt-in period until July 1, 2020 when CEQA VMT analysis becomes mandatory Statewide. At that time, impacts on auto delay or level of service, as described in criterion (a), will no longer be considered a significant impact under CEQA. As discussed in the General Plan EIR, the VMT per capita is projected to increase from 10.5 to 10.9 under General Plan buildout conditions. The proposed project would construct a 156-room hotel, which is consistent with the land use evaluated in the General Plan EIR and would not directly result in any additional new population growth or employment growth beyond what was accounted for in the General Plan EIR. Accordingly, implementation of the project would be consistent with and would have no effect on the VMT estimates presented in the General Plan EIR. For the reasons describe above, the proposed project would not conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) and impacts would be less than significant. c) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Driveway Design As shown on Figure 3-4 in Chapter 3 of this Initial Study, vehicular and bicycle access to the project site would be provided from two limited-access (right-turn only) driveways located on North De Anza Boulevard: one located at the northern end of the project site and one located at the southern end of the project site. Both driveways would provide access to the passenger drop-off/pick-up area adjacent to the THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-85 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT hotel lobby entrance on the south side of the proposed hotel, as well as to the underground parking garage. Both project driveways would also continue to serve the existing Homestead Square Shopping Center. The driveway widths would be 30 feet wide at the south access point, a reduction from the existing 34-foot driveway, and 32 feet and 4 inches wide at the north access point, a reduction from the existing 40-foot driveway. As proposed, both driveways would adequately serve two-way traffic as intended and are consistent with the CG-rg zoning district which requires driveways to be wide enough to accommodate the width of three cars (e.g., 30 feet wide). The project-generated trips that are estimated to use the two driveways are a combined 48 inbound and 36 outbound trips during the AM peak hour, and 48 inbound and 51 outbound trips during the PM peak hour. Although North De Anza Boulevard has high traffic volumes in the southbound direction, based on observed traffic conditions, outbound vehicle queues should rarely exceed 2 or 3 vehicles in length during the peak hours, and no queuing issues are expected to occur. North De Anza Boulevard has a raised median between Homestead Road and the I-280 northbound ramps. The project driveways would provide limited access, allowing only inbound and outbound right turns to and from North De Anza Boulevard. Consequently, outbound vehicles seeking to travel north on North De Anza Boulevard must make a U-turn at the I-280 southbound ramps, while inbound vehicles approaching from the south must make a U-turn at Homestead Road to access the project driveways. Based on the project trip distribution pattern, it is estimated that 12 vehicles during the AM peak hour and 17 vehicles during the PM peak hour would be making a U-turn at the I-280 southbound ramps, while 26 vehicles during the AM peak hour and 25 vehicles during the PM peak hour would be making a U-turn at Homestead Road. Sight Distance There are some existing trees along the project frontage on North De Anza Boulevard; however, the trees do not conflict with a driver’s ability to locate gaps in traffic given their high canopies. The project driveways are free and clear of visual obstructions, thereby ensuring exiting vehicles can see pedestrians on the sidewalks and vehicles and bicycles traveling on North De Anza Boulevard. Any proposed additional landscaping and/or signage would be required to be located in such a way to ensure an unobstructed view for drivers exiting the site. Adequate sight distance (sight distance triangles) should be provided at the driveways on De Anza Boulevard providing access to the project site in accordance with Caltrans standards, as described in the Highway Design Manual (July 2, 2018). Sight distance triangles should be measured approximately 10 feet back from the traveled way. Providing the appropriate sight distance reduces the likelihood of a collision at an intersection or driveway and provides drivers with the ability to locate sufficient gaps in traffic. The minimum acceptable sight distance is often considered the Caltrans stopping sight distance. Sight distance requirements vary depending on the roadway speeds. Given that De Anza Boulevard has a posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour (mph), the Caltrans stopping sight distance is 360 feet (based on a design speed of 45 mph). Thus, a driver must be able to see 360 feet in both directions along De Anza Boulevard in THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-86 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT order to stop and avoid a collision. Based on existing observations and the project site plan, both driveways on De Anza Boulevard meet the Caltrans stopping sight distance standard. Queuing Analysis An analysis of the left-turn pocket queuing and storage lengths for the southbound left-turn movement at the North De Anza Boulevard/I-280 southbound ramps intersection and the northbound left-turn movement at the North De Anza Boulevard/Homestead Road intersection was prepared in the TIA for the proposed project. At the North De Anza Boulevard/Homestead Road intersection, the storage pockets for the westbound left-turn movement consists of two lanes, one approximately 225 feet and the other 425 feet in length, for a total capacity of approximately 650 feet. For analysis purposes, this was averaged to 325 feet per lane, which equates to an available storage of 13 vehicles per lane. The queuing analysis indicates that adequate vehicle storage capacity currently exists to accommodate the 95th percentile vehicle queues that occur during the AM and PM peak hours of traffic. The additional traffic from approved projects in the area is estimated to increase the 95th percentile queue to 350 feet per lane, or 14 vehicles per lane, during the AM peak hour. Thus, the estimated queue length would exceed the available storage by one vehicle per lane under background conditions during the AM peak hour. The addition of project traffic would not increase the 95th percentile vehicle queue during either the AM or PM peak hours. Because the project would only add a small amount of traffic to the westbound left-turn movement at the North De Anza Boulevard/Homestead Road intersection and would have no effect on the queue length of this turn movement, the project is expected to have a minimal effect on traffic operations at this location. Truck Access and Circulation Truck activities (e.g., deliveries and garbage collection) for the project are not expected to occur within the garage due to height and access limitations. The majority of loading and unloading is expected to occur within the proposed freight loading zone at the northwest corner of the hotel building adjacent to the north elevator. The designated loading zone is shown to be 40 feet long by 9 feet wide and would be adequate to serve the hotel. Small delivery vehicles could also access the porte-cochere to make hotel office deliveries. The project plans show the trash room would be located at the northwest corner of the hotel building. Garbage collection activities would occur on-site at this location outside the building. It is assumed that garbage trucks could enter the site from either project driveway on De Anza Boulevard. On-site garbage collection activities would involve rolling the trash bins out of the trash enclosure, collecting the waste material, and returning the bins to the enclosure. Since the bins would be stored in outside trash enclosures, adequate overhead clearance would be available to empty the dumpsters over the truck. The project site plan was reviewed for truck access using truck turning-movement templates for a SU-30 (single-unit) truck type, which represents small- to medium-sized emergency vehicles, garbage trucks, THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-87 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT delivery trucks and moving trucks. Based on the current site plan configuration, SU-30 trucks would have adequate access at both project driveways. As proposed, the 30-foot wide southern project driveway would provide adequate space for trucks (including emergency vehicles) to enter the driveway and vehicles to exit the driveway simultaneously. Figure 16 in the TIA shows the anticipated clockwise truck circulation pattern based on the proposed site layout. On-site truck circulation would be adequate. Bike and Pedestrian On-site Circulation The site plan shows adequate pedestrian circulation throughout the site, as well as between the site and the surrounding pedestrian facilities. The project would construct a continuous sidewalk around the perimeter of the hotel building, except along the west side of the hotel building where landscaping is being proposed. Project plans also show pedestrian access between the parking structure and the on-site uses would be provided via elevators and a stairway on each parking level. The elevators would be centrally located, as well as situated along the north end of the building/garage. The stairways would be located adjacent to the north elevator and in the southwest corner of the building, providing direct access to either the hotel’s main lobby or to an exit corridor. Class 2 (publicly accessible bicycle racks) bicycle parking spaces would be located adjacent to the main hotel drive aisle at the southwest corner of the building. This would allow bicyclists to enter/leave the project site using the project driveways and connect to the bike lanes on North De Anza Boulevard. Providing convenient bike parking will help create a pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly environment and encourage bicycling by guests and employees. In addition, the inclusion of convenient bike parking complements the bicycle facilities in the vicinity of the project site. The proposed hotel would be compatible with the surrounding commercial land uses and would not result in a design that would substantially increase hazards in the area. Accordingly, impacts would be less than significant. d) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? Access to the proposed project would generally be the same as under existing conditions. As described in criterion (c) above, no hazardous driving conditions due to a design feature would occur. Emergency vehicles would continue to access the site in much the same way as it is accessed today. While the SCCFD and City of Cupertino Building Division would coordinate the review of building permits for precise final measurements, the preliminary plans have been designed to meet the turning radius requirements for emergency vehicles. Project plans include approved fire and emergency access through all phases of construction and operation. Compliance with the provisions of the Cupertino Fire Code and Cupertino Building Code would ensure that adequate access would be provided. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in inadequate emergency access, no impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures would be required. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-88 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT XVI. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe, and that is: i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k), or ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of the Public Resource Code Section 5024.1 for the purposes of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance to a California Native American tribe.     GENERAL PLAN EIR As described above in Section VI, Cultural Resources, the General Plan EIR addressed impacts to cultural resources associated with intensified development of the project site and impacts were less than significant. The cultural resources study prepared for the General Plan EIR consists of archival research at the Northwest Information Center at Sonoma State University, examination of the library and files, field inspection, and contact with the Native American community. The cultural resources study addressed impacts associated with archeological resources, including those of Native Americans. As shown in Table 4.4-2, Cultural Resources in the Project Study Area and Vicinity, and on Figure 4.4-1, Cultural Resources, of the General Plan EIR, there are no identified cultural resources including those affiliated with Native Americans are present on the project site. EXISTING CONDITIONS Assembly Bill (AB) 52 amended CEQA to add standards of significance that relate to Native American consultation and added “tribal cultural resources” to the specific cultural resources protected under CEQA.119 AB 52 requires the CEQA lead agency to begin consultation with any California Native American 119 California Environmental Quality Act Statute, Section 21074. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-89 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of a proposed project if the Tribe requests in writing, to be informed by the lead agency through formal notification of the proposed projects in the area. The consultation is required before the determination of whether a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or EIR is required. In addition, AB 52 includes time limits for certain responses regarding consultation. Pursuant to CEQA Section 21084.3 public agencies shall, when feasible, avoid damaging effects to any tribal cultural resources. Information shared by tribes as a result of AB 52 consultation shall be documented in a confidential file, as necessary, and made part of a lead agency’s administrative record. The City of Cupertino has not received a request from any Tribes in the geographic area with which it is traditionally and culturally affiliated with or otherwise to be notified about projects in the city. CEQA Section 21074.3(a) defines a tribal cultural resource as a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of size and scope, sacred place, and object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either included or eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historic Resources or included a local register of historical resources, or if the City, acting as the lead agency, supported by substantial evidence, chooses at its discretion to treat the resource as a tribal cultural resource. DISCUSSION a) Would the proposed project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American Tribe, and that is: i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k), or ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of the Public Resource Code Section 5024.1 for the purposes of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance to a California Native American tribe? The discussion in Section VI, Cultural Resources, is applicable to impacts to tribal cultural resources. As discussed under criteria (b) and (c) in Section IV, no known archeological resources, ethnographic sites or Native American remains are located on the project site. As discussed in Section VI, Cultural Resources under criterion (b), above, implementation of Mitigation Measure CULT-1 would reduce impacts to unknown archaeological deposits, including tribal cultural resources, to a less-than-significant level. As discussed in Section VI, Cultural Resources under criterion (c), above, compliance with State and federal regulations would reduce the likelihood of disturbing or discovering human remains, including those of Native Americans, that may be discovered during project ground-disturbing activities. Therefore, implementation of Mitigation Measure CULT-1 and compliance with State and federal regulations related THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-90 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT to the protection of human remains would reduce impacts to tribal cultural resources to a less-than- significant level. Impact TRC-1: The proposed project could cause a substantial adverse impact to an unknown Tribal Cultural Resource. Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Implement Mitigation Measure CULT-1. XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the proposed project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?     b) Have insufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years?     c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?     d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e) Comply with federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?     GENERAL PLAN EIR Chapter 4.14, Utilities and Services Systems, of the General Plan EIR, includes an analysis of impacts related to water supply, wastewater, and solid waste. Impacts were found to be less than significant and less than significant with mitigation. The City is required to implement General Plan Mitigation Measures UTIL-6a through UTIL-6c, and UTIL-8 to ensure impacts related to wastewater and solid waste are less than significant. General Plan Mitigation Measures UTIL-6a through UTIL-6c require the City to work with the Cupertino Sanitary District (CSD) to increase the available citywide treatment and transmission capacity, identify appropriate and current wastewater generation rates that are approved by CSD and establish a monitoring and tracking system for wastewater generation to better understand the City’s need for potential capacity upgrades from CSD. General Plan Mitigation Measure UTIL-8 requires the City to continue current recycling and zero-waste practices, monitor solid waste generation and seek new landfill sites to replace the Altamont and Newby Island landfills, at such time that these landfills are THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-91 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT closed. These mitigation measures, which were previously adopted by the City and incorporated into the General Plan, will be implemented by the City. EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing conditions for each of the utility providers listed below:  The Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) is the primary water resources agency for Santa Clara County. The project site is located within the California Water Service (Cal Water) Los Altos Suburban District (LASD) service area, and Cal Water would supply water for the project. Water supply for the LASD is a combination of groundwater from wells in the LASD and treated water purchased from SCVWD.  Cupertino Sanitary District (CSD) provides sanitary sewer services for the project site. Wastewater would be treated at the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant (SJ/SCWPCP).  Recology South Bay (Recology) would provide curbside recycling, garbage, and compost and yard waste service to the residents of the project. The City has a contract with Newby Island Sanitary Landfill until 2023, which, according to CalRecycle, had a remaining capacity of 21,200,000 cubic yards and daily disposal capacity is 4,000 tons per day as of October 31, 2014.120  Gas and electricity would be supplied to the project site by Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E).  Telephone service would be provided by AT&T and other providers. Cable television service would be available from a number of providers, including Comcast. DISCUSSION a) Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Wastewater Treatment Facilities The CSD sewer collection system directs wastewater to the SJ/SCWPCP, which is jointly owned by the cities of San José and Santa Clara. Municipal storm water discharges in the City of Cupertino are subject to the Waste Discharge Requirements of the new Municipal Regional Permit (MRP; Order Number R2-2015- 0049) and NPDES Permit Number CAS612008, which became effective on January 1, 2016. The MRP currently allows dry weather discharges of up to 167 million gallons per day (mgd) with full tertiary treatment, and wet weather discharges of up to 271 mgd with full tertiary treatment. As discussed below in criterion (c), future demands from the proposed project would not exceed the design or permitted capacity of the SJ/SCWPCP that serves the project site. Future water treatment demand was assessed in 120 Calrecycle website, http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Directory/43-AN-0003/Detail/, accessed March 1, 2019. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-92 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT consultation with the City of Cupertino and includes consideration of development in the city through the 2040 buildout horizon of the General Plan. Therefore, development of the proposed project would not require any improvements not already considered and the impact of the proposed project on SJ/SCWPCP would be less than significant. Stormwater Drainage As previously discussed in Section IX, Hydrology and Water Quality, the proposed project does not exceed the capacity of stormwater drainage system that serves the project site. All new development that, like the proposed project, creates or replaces 10,000 square feet or more of impervious surface would be subject to Provision C.3 guidelines for stormwater control. Through C.3 compliance, the proposed project would involve actions to minimize runoff from the project site as described in Section IX, Hydrology and Water Quality, above. Additionally, the project would comply with CMC Chapter 9.18 described above in Section 3.1.4.2, Zoning, which is intended to provide regulations and give legal effect to certain requirements of the NPDES permit issued to the City. The project site is located in an area where the storm drains are deficient in conveying the water from a 10-year storm based on the 2018 Storm Drain Master Plan. The lines on Homestead Road, from Sunnyvale East Channel to De Anza Boulevard are currently under capacity and designated as low priority for replacement.121 However, the proposed project would not exacerbate this existing condition. The proposed project would provide several bioretention water treatment areas, raised planters and drainage management areas throughout the project site. These would collect runoff from roof areas, parking lots, sidewalks and streets for treatment and flow control prior to discharge into the internal storm drain system, which connects to the City’s storm drain system in North De Anza Boulevard. When combined, the on-site water treatment areas would meet the required treatment areas of 1,997 square feet. Consequently, the proposed project would not require the expansion of existing stormwater facilities or the construction of new facilities, the construction of which could otherwise have significant impacts. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures would be required. Other Utility Facilities Other utility facilities that serve the project site include electric power, natural gas, and telecommunications facilities. Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) would supply natural gas and electricity to the project site. AT&T and other providers would provide telephone service. Cable television service would be available from a number of providers, including Comcast. The proposed project is an infill development project that would result in an increase in land use intensity in a portion of the city that has access to existing infrastructure and services, which was accounted for in the General Plan EIR. The project would include appropriate on-site infrastructure to connect to the existing PG&E and telecommunication 121 Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Civil Engineers. 2018. Cupertino Storm Drain Master Plan. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-93 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT systems and would not require new off-site facilities and distribution infrastructure or capacity enhancing alterations to any existing facilities. Accordingly, impacts would be less than significant. b) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? As shown in the General Plan EIR in Chapter 4.14, the water supply at project buildout year 2020 would be 13,078-acre feet122 per year (afy) and at General Plan buildout year 2040 would be 16,984 afy. As discussed in the General Plan EIR, buildout of the General Plan would not result in insufficient water supplies from Cal Water under normal year conditions or during single-dry year and multiple-dry years, with the proposed and existing water conservation regulations and measures in place. The water supply evaluation prepared for the General Plan EIR included new development in the City at a greater number of hotel rooms at the project site than proposed under the project (250 rooms compared to 156 rooms); therefore, water supply impacts were adequately addressed in the General Plan EIR. The applicable water use generation rate for hotel rooms and banquet areas, such as the proposed project, would be 0.50 gallons per day per square foot (gpd/sf). Therefore, the estimated water demand is 156 hotel rooms x 390 square foot per room x 0.50 gpd/sf for a total of 30,420 gpd or 34 afy. The Water Supply Evaluation prepared for the General Plan EIR estimated a total of 1,339 hotel rooms (1,000 new rooms plus 339 existing rooms) would generate water demand of 261,100 gpd or 293 afy. Accordingly, the proposed project’s water demand would not exceed the available water supply in 2020 at project buildout or by the General Plan buildout year (2040). Accordingly, impacts to water supply under the proposed project would be less than significant. c) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Based on the May 2007 City of Santa Clara Sewer Capacity Assessment, the estimated wastewater generation rate for hotel uses is 100 gpd per room. Applying this generation rate, the proposed 156-room hotel would generate up to 15,600 gpd or approximately 0.0156 mgd of wastewater. The SJ/SCWPCP’s current total capacity of 450 mgd. Combined, the proposed project’s wastewater generation (0.0156 mgd) and the existing wastewater generated (105 mgd) would not exceed the SJ/SCWPCP’s current total capacity of 450 mgd. The CSD has a contractual maximum treatment allocation of 7.85 mgd, on average, with the SJ/SCWPCP. At the time of the General Plan EIR, the wastewater generation of 5.3 mgd was estimated by the CSD.123 122 One acre-foot equals about 326,000 gallons, or enough water to cover an acre of land, about the size of a football field, one foot deep. 123 City of Cupertino, General Plan (Community Vision 2015–2040, Appendix B: Housing Element Technical Report, 4.3 Environmental, Infrastructure & Public Service Constraints, page B-93. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-94 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Combined, the existing wastewater flow (5.3 mgd) plus the proposed project (0.0156 mgd) would not exceed the City’s contractual allocation limits (7.85 mgd). Furthermore, the proposed 156-room hotel is within the 1,339-hotel-room limit evaluated in the General Plan EIR; therefore, no new impact would result. The CSD wastewater system flows through a portion of the City of Santa Clara’s sewer system. The contractual agreement between CSD and the City of Santa Clara, for this portion of the Santa Clara sewer system, allows 13.8 mgd during peak wet weather flows. The existing CSD peak wet weather flow into the Santa Clara system is 13.29 mgd.124 However, the estimated wastewater generation from the proposed project and from other potential projects as established by the General Plan and other approved projects, the total capacity needed to serve these projects is approximately 14.02 mgd.125 Therefore, the proposed project, and other approved and potential projects as established by the General Plan buildout, will require a reduction in sewer generation from the CSD system prior to flowing into the City of Santa Clara system, or additional capacity rights will need to be acquired from the City of Santa Clara. CSD performed smoke testing of a portion of the sewer system in 2018. The results of the smoke testing showed that certain portions of their system are being impacted by inflow from illegal connections to the system. These illegal connections include area drains, catch basins and roof rainwater leaders from both public and private facilities within the City of Cupertino and the City of Saratoga jurisdictions. These illegal connections collect storm water and direct the flow to the sewer system. Calculating the flows from these illegal connections, using the Manning’s flow equation and the size of the areas that flow to these connections, there is an addition of approximately 0.4 mgd to the sanitary sewer peak wet weather flow. Disconnecting these illegal connections and redirecting these storm water flows to the public storm drain system would result in a reduction of the sewer peak wet weather from 14.02 mgd to 13.62 mgd, which is below the City of Santa Clara contractual limit. Construction and operation of the proposed hotel would exceed the 13.8 mgd contractual limit through the City of Santa Clara and this significant impact would be reduced to less than significant with implementation of Mitigation Measure UTIL-1. Impact UTIL-1: The proposed project may result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it does not have adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments. Mitigation Measure UTIL-1: No building permits shall be issued by the City for the proposed De Anza Hotel Project that would result in exceeding the permitted peak wet weather flow capacity of 13.8 124 Mark Thomas. Cupertino Sanitary District Flow Modeling Analysis Homestead Flume Outfall to City of Santa Clara. February 20, 2019. 125 Mark Thomas. Cupertino Sanitary District Flow Modeling Analysis Homestead Flume Outfall to City of Santa Clara. February 20, 2019Sewage coefficients use to calculate the sewer generation rates for the various uses in the project and the General Plan buildout were taken from the San Jose - Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant Specific Use Code & Sewer Coefficient table and from the City of Santa Clara Sanitary Sewer Capacity Assessment, May 2007. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-95 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT mgd through the Santa Clara sanitary sewer system. The project applicant may demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City of Cupertino and Cupertino Sanitary District (CSD), that the proposed hotel would not exceed the peak wet weather flow capacity of the Santa Clara sanitary sewer system by implementing one or more of the following methods: 1) Reduce inflow and infiltration in the CSD system to reduce peak wet weather flows; or 2) Increase on-site water reuse, such as increased grey water use, or reduce water consumption of the fixtures used within the proposed project, or other methods that are measurable and reduce sewer generation rates to acceptable levels, to the satisfaction of the CSD. 3) The proposed project’s estimated wastewater generation shall be calculated using the generation rates used by the San Jose-Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant Specific Use Code & Sewer Coefficient table in the May 2007, City of Santa Clara Sanitary Sewer Capacity Assessment,126 and California Green Building Standards, unless alternative (i.e., lower) generation rates achieved by the proposed project are substantiated by the project applicant based on evidence to the satisfaction of the CSD. Alternatively, if the prior agreement between CSD and the City of Santa Clara that currently limits the permitted peak wet weather flow capacity of 13.8 mgd through the Santa Clara sanitary sewer system were to be updated to increase the permitted peak wet weather flow, this would also render any impacts to be less than significant. If this were to occur prior to the City’s approval of building permits, then Mitigation Measure UTIL-1 would no longer be required to be implemented. Implementation of the Mitigation Measure UTIL-1 would guarantee that no development on the project site could occur that would exceed 13.8 mgd peak wet weather flow contractual limit through the City of Santa Clara and CSD by ensuring that no building permit would be issued for any structures or units that result in the contractual limit being exceeded until: (1) additional capacity is available through the City of Santa Clara’s sewer system; (2) improvements would be made to the CSD sewer system that reduce the peak wet weather flows that enter the City of Santa Clara system; (3) improvements would be made on the project site that ensure the contractual limit is not exceed; or (4) the completion of any combination of these approaches that adequately addresses potential capacity issues. Accordingly, impacts would be less than significant with mitigation. d) Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? The City contracts with Recology to provide solid waste collection services to residents and businesses in the city. The City has a contract with Newby Island Sanitary Landfill until 2023 and has not secured a new 126 Mark Thomas and Associates. Email communication with Cupertino Public Works. July 19, 2018. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-96 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT landfill contract. However, according to the Integrated Waste Management Plan, the landfills in the County (including NISL where the City’s collected solid waste is currently being landfilled) have adequate disposal capacity beyond 2026.127 The City, therefore, has options for landfill service once the City’s existing contract with NISL ends in 2023. In addition to the Newby Island Landfill, solid waste generated in Cupertino can also be disposed of at the Altamont Landfill and Resource Recovery facility, the Corinda Los Trancos Landfill, Forward Landfill Inc., Guadalupe Sanitary Landfill, Kirby Canyon Recycling and Disposal Facility, the Monterey Peninsula Landfill, Recology Hay Road, the Vasco Road Sanitary Landfill, the Zanker Material Processing Facility, and the Zanker Road Class III Landfill. Waste management for the proposed project would focus on waste, recycling, and composting. Solid waste generated by construction of the proposed project would largely consist of demolition waste from the existing buildings as well as construction debris. The project would be required to comply with CMC Chapter 16.72, Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Waste, and the City’s Zero Waste Policy, which requires the recycling or diversion at least 65 percent of all generated construction and demolition (C&D) waste by salvage or by transfer to an approved facility.128,129 Prior to the issuance of any demolition, grading, and/or building permits, the applicant is required to submit a properly completed Waste Management Plan. The Waste Management Plan shall do the following:  Identify the materials to be diverted from disposal by recycling, reused on the project, or salvaged for future use or sale.  Specify if materials would be sorted on-site or mixed for transportation to a diversion facility.  Identify the diversion facility where the material collected will be taken.  Identify construction methods employed to reduce the amount of waste generated.  Specify that the amount of materials diverted shall be calculated by weight or volume, but not by both. Compliance with CMC Chapter 16.72 and the City’s Zero Waste Policy would reduce solid waste and construction-related impacts on landfill capacity. The operation of the project is estimated to generate approximately 78 employees on the site. In 2016, the city of Cupertino’s actual disposal rate for employees was 4.5 PPD, a much lower disposal rate than the estimated target disposal rate of 8.1 PPD.130 The city of Cupertino’s disposal rates for employees have been below target rates and steadily decreasing since 2007, with the exception of 2014, when the rate 127 Santa Clara County Integrated Waste Management Plan, County of Santa Clara Environmental Resources Agency, 1996. 128 Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 16, Buildings and Construction, Chapter 16.72, Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Waste, Section 16.72.040, Diversion Requirement. 129 City of Cupertino, Public Works, Garbage & Recycling, https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/environment- sustainability/waste, accessed October 4, 2018. 130 CalRecycle, “Jurisdiction per Capita Disposal Trends: Cupertino,” http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/, accessed June 10, 2018. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-97 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (9.8 PPD) exceeded the target (8.10 PPD).131 The project would also include temporary residents at the hotel. According to CalRecycle, the disposal rate of hotels is estimated to be 2 PPD for each room.132 Applying these disposal rates, the project would generate approximately 944 PPD or 0.5 tons per day of new waste,133 which is well within the Newby Island Sanitary Landfill permitted daily disposal capacity of 4,000 tons per day. Anticipated rates of solid waste disposal would have a less-than-significant impact with regard to staying within the target disposal rates, and the project would comply with the City’s current recycling ordinances and zero-waste policies, which would further reduce solid waste disposed of in the landfill. Thus, operation-related impacts on landfill capacity would be less than significant. e) Would the project comply with federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? The City’s per capita disposal rate for 2017 was 3.6 PPD, which is below the 4.3 PPD target rate established by CalRecycle.134 As part of the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan to address waste management conditions within Santa Clara County, Cupertino adopted a Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE)135 and Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE)136 in compliance with the California Integrated Waste Management Act.137 The City has gone beyond the SRRE by implementing several programs, including the City’s and Recology’s organics or food waste collection program, and Environmental Recycling Day events offered to residents three times per year by Recology. Implementation of the referenced strategies, programs and plans, as well as the Cupertino CAP that was adopted in January 2015, will enable the city to meet the 75 percent solid waste diversion rate by the year 2020. Additionally, in December 2017, the City adopted a Zero Waste Policy.138 According to the Zero Waste Policy, the City will require, through the City’s waste hauling franchise agreement, steadfast and ongoing efforts by the City’s franchisee to maintain a minimum residential and commercial waste diversion rate of 75 percent with a goal of reaching and maintaining 80 percent by 2025.These programs will be sufficient to ensure that future development in Cupertino, including the proposed project, would not compromise the ability to meet or perform better than the State mandated target. Additionally, construction and any demolition debris associated with the project would be subject to CMC Chapter 16.72, requiring that a minimum of 65 percent of C&D debris be diverted from landfill.139 Additionally, the 131 CalRecycle, “Jurisdiction per Capita Disposal Trends: Cupertino,” http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/, accessed June 10, 2018. 132 CalRecycle, “Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rate,” https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates, accessed June 10, 2018. 133 (8.1 PPD x 78 net new employees = 631.8 PPD) + (2 PPD x 156 rooms = 312 PPD) = 943.8 PPD 134 CalRecycle. 2017. Disposal Rate Calculator. https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/AnnualReporting /DisposalRate Calculator, accessed March 18, 2019. 135 City of Cupertino, Public Works, Source Reduction and Recycling Element, September 21, 1992. 136 City of Cupertino, Public Works, Household Hazardous Waste Element, September 21, 1992. 137 Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 9, Health and Sanitation, Chapter 9.6, Solid Waste, Non-Organic Recycling and Recycling Areas, Section 9.16.010(a), Purpose. 138 City of Cupertino, Public Works, Garbage & Recycling, https://www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/environment- sustainability/waste, accessed October 4, 2018. 139 Cupertino Municipal Code, Title 16, Buildings and Construction, Chapter 16.72, Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Waste, Section 16.72.040, Diversion Requirement. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-98 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT City’s Zero Waste Policy also requires that all private construction projects that come through the City’s permitting process, and all City projects (through contract requirements), to recover and divert at least 65 percent of the construction waste generated by the project. Compliance with applicable statutes and regulations would ensure that the impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures would be required. XVIII. WILDFIRE If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?     b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?     c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?     d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes?     GENERAL PLAN EIR Chapter 4.7, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, of the General Plan EIR, addressed wildfire hazard and impacts are found to be less than significant. Note this section of the Initial Study addresses additional questions regarding wildfire related impacts pursuant to the news CEQA Guidelines that were adopted in December 2018. EXISTING CONDITIONS Wildland fire protection in California is the responsibility of either the State, local government, or the federal government. State Responsibility Areas (SRA) are the areas in the State where the State of California has the primary financial responsibility for the prevention and suppression of wildland fires. The SRA forms one large area over 31 million acres to which the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) provides a basic level of wildland fire prevention and protection services. Local Responsibility Areas (LRA) include incorporated cities, cultivated agriculture lands, and portions of the desert. LRA fire protection is typically provided by city fire departments, fire protection districts, THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-99 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT counties, and by CAL FIRE under contract to local government.140 CAL FIRE uses an extension of the SRA Fire Hazard Severity Zone model as the basis for evaluating fire hazard in LRA. The LRA hazard rating reflects flame and ember intrusion from adjacent wildlands and from flammable vegetation in the urban area. The SCCFD currently provides fire protection and emergency medical services to the city. Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) are identified by Moderate, High and Very High in an SRA, and Very High in a LRA. The nearest FHSZ in the SRA and the LRA is a VHFHSZ about 5 miles south where the Fremont Older Open Space Preserve interfaces with the urban edge.141 Land between the edge of the FHSZ and the project site is dense urban development. DISCUSSION The project site is not located in or near SRAs or lands classified as high fire hazard severity zones; therefore, no impact would occur. See Section VIII, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, for a discussion of the project’s potential to conflict with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan, and expose people and structures to a significant loss, injury or death involving wildfires. See Section IX, Hydrology and Water Quality, for additional discussion on the project’s potential to alter the existing drainage pattern. XIX. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?     140 California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention (CAL FIRE). Frequently Asked Questions. http://www.fire.ca.gov/firepreventionfee/sra_faqs, accessed January 6, 2019. 141 California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention (CAL FIRE). The Fire and Resource Assessment Program (FRAP). Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) in SRA and LRA. FHSZ Viewer. http://www.fire.ca.gov/fire_prevention/fire_prevention_wildland_zones_maps THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-100 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant No Impact b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?     c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?     DISCUSSION a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? The project site is in an urbanized and extensively developed area of Cupertino, which is almost entirely built out with commercial and residential development, and associated surface parking. The project site is currently developed with an 8,323 square-foot building that is one story (approximately 18 feet) tall and is occupied with a Goodyear Tire, with a few green spaces and trees within and surrounding the on-site building. There are no identified sensitive natural communities, no areas of sensitive habitat, and no areas of critical habitat on the project site. Additionally, there are no buildings currently listed or eligible for listing on the California Register of Historical Resources, no recorded archaeological sites, and no known paleontological resources located on the project site. The implementation of Mitigation Measures AQ-1, GHG-1, BIO-1, CULT-1, TCR -1, and UTIL-1 would serve to protect the quality of the air, nesting birds, and unknown cultural and tribal resources, as well as ensure adequate services are provided and that no additional physical impacts would occur elsewhere. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant impact to the quality of the environment, wildlife, and major periods of California history or prehistory. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? CEQA Guidelines Section 15355 defines cumulative impacts as two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts. Cumulative impacts may result from individually minor, but collectively significant projects taking place THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PLACEWORKS 4-101 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT over a period of time. CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(b) advises that a discussion of cumulative impacts should reflect both the severity of the impacts and the likelihood of their occurrence. To accomplish these two objectives, CEQA Guidelines Section 15130 permits two different methodologies for completion of a cumulative impact analysis and allows for a reasonable combination of the two approaches:  The ‘list’ approach permits the use of a list of past, present, and probable future projects producing related or cumulative impacts, including projects both within and outside the city; and  The ‘projections’ approach allows the use of a summary of projections contained in an adopted plan or related planning document, such as a regional transportation plan, or in an EIR prepared for such a plan. The projections may be supplemented with additional information such as regional modeling. Table 4-17 shows the other reasonably foreseeable projects in Cupertino and how they relate to the maximum buildout potential evaluated in the General Plan EIR. TABLE 4-17 REASONABLY FORESEEABLE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS IN CUPERTINO Hotel Residential Commercial Office General Plan EIR: Maximum Development Potential 1,339 4,421 1,343,679 4,040,231 Reasonably Foreseeable Projects Marina Plazaa 122 188 23,000 The Hamptons Redevelopmenta 600 The Foruma 23 Westport Cupertinob 242 20,000 The Village Hotelb 185 Canyon Crossingsb 18 4,536 Vallcoc 339 2,923 600,000 1,810,000 Total Foreseeable Development 646 3,994 643,000 1,810,000 General Plan EIR: Remaining Development Potential 693 427 700,679 2,230,231 Notes: a. The project has been approved. b. The project is under review. c. The buildout numbers are a worst-case sum of the greatest buildout potential for this site for each land use category, and are derived from the amounts of development in the previously approved Vallco Special Area Specific Plan and EIR (339 hotel rooms, 2,923 units, 1,750,000 square feet commercial, and 600,000 square feet commercial) and Vallco SB 35 Application (0 hotel rooms, 2,402 units, 1,810,000 square feet commercial, and 400,000 square feet commercial). Source: City of Cupertino, 2019. The General Plan EIR evaluated the cumulative effects of the General Plan Amendments, Housing Element Update, and Associated Rezoning using the summary of projections approach provided for in CEQA THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 4-102 JULY 2 , 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Guidelines Section 15130(b)(1)(B). The General Plan EIR took into account growth from the General Plan within the Cupertino city boundary and Sphere of Influence (SOI), in combination with projected growth in the rest of Santa Clara County and the surrounding region, as forecast by ABAG. As provided for by CEQA Guidelines Section 15130, the cumulative context considered in the General Plan EIR varies, depending on the nature of the issue being studied, to best assess each issue‘s geographic extent. For example, the cumulative impacts on water and air quality can be best analyzed within the boundaries of the affected resources, such as water bodies and air basins. For other cumulative impacts, such as hazard risks, traffic, and the need for new public service facilities, the cumulative impact is best analyzed within the context of the population growth and associated development that are expected to occur in the region or the public service providers’ jurisdiction. The General Plan EIR included an assessment of the redevelopment of the project site with mixed-use, hotel, retail, and residential projects. The hotel assumptions included an evaluation of up to 250 hotel rooms, which is greater than the proposed 156-room De Anza Hotel. Therefore, as shown in Table 4-17, the project when combined with the other reasonably foreseeable projects in Cupertino would not exceed the maximum buildout potential evaluated in the General Plan EIR. The impact discussions in Section I through Section XVI above describes the proposed projects relationship to and consistency with the scope of development, land use designations, population projections, and cumulative impacts analyses contained in the General Plan EIR. As shown, the project’s cumulative impacts were determined to be less than significant or less than significant with mitigation in the cumulative context. Since the certification of the General Plan EIR, the City has considered new development at the Vallco project site. While, as shown in Table 4-17, this development at the Vallco site is consistent with the maximum buildout potential in the General Plan EIR for citywide cumulative discussions (e.g., population and housing, water supply, etc.), the General Plan EIR did not evaluate localized cumulative impacts, such as traffic, traffic related noise, and utilities infrastructure, for the vicinity of the project site. Due to the distance between the proposed De Anza Hotel and the projects listed in Table 4-17, no localized cumulative impacts related traffic, noise, or utilities would occur. As described in the environmental checklist, the impacts of the proposed project would be mitigated to less-than-significant levels. The proposed project would incrementally contribute to, but would not exceed, the cumulative impacts analyses included in the General Plan EIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not be expected to contribute to significant cumulative impacts when considered along with other impacts under the General Plan. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? As discussed previously, the proposed project would not result in a significant impact that could not be mitigated to a less-than-significant level, thus the proposed project’s environmental effects would be less than significant. PLACEWORKS 5-1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared for the De Anza Hotel Project. The purpose of the MMRP is to ensure the implementation of project-specific mitigation measures identified as part of the environmental review for the proposed project. The MMRP includes the following information:  The full text of the mitigation measures;  The party responsible for implementing the mitigation measures;  The timing for implementation of the mitigation measure;  The agency responsible for monitoring the implementation; and  The monitoring action and frequency. The City of Cupertino must adopt this MMRP, or an equally effective program, if it approves the proposed project with the mitigation measures that were adopted or made conditions of project approval. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 5-2 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT TABLE 5-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Party Responsible for Implementation Implementation Timing Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Action Monitoring Frequency AIR QUALITY Mitigation Measure AQ-1: The project’s construction contractor shall comply with the following best management practices for reducing construction emissions of fugitive dust (PM10 and PM2.5) as required by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District Revised California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines:  Water all active construction areas at least twice daily, or as often as needed to control dust emissions. Watering should be sufficient to prevent airborne dust from leaving the site. Increased watering frequency may be necessary whenever wind speeds exceed 15 miles per hour. Reclaimed water should be used whenever possible.  Pave, apply water twice daily or as often as necessary to control dust, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas, and staging areas at construction sites.  Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard (i.e., the minimum required space between the top of the load and the top of the trailer).  Sweep daily (with water sweepers using reclaimed water if possible) or as often as needed all paved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at the construction site to control dust.  Sweep public streets daily (with water sweepers using reclaimed water if possible) in the vicinity of the project site, or as often as needed, to keep streets free of visible soil material.  Hydroseed or apply non-toxic soil stabilizers to inactive construction areas.  Enclose, cover, water twice daily, or apply non-toxic soil binders to exposed stockpiles (dirt/sand).  Limit vehicle traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour.  Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as possible.  Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff from public roadways. Applicant During construction City of Cupertino Public Works Department And Building Department Plan Review and Approval During scheduled construction site inspections THE DE ANZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM PLACEWORKS 5-3 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT TABLE 5-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Party Responsible for Implementation Implementation Timing Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Action Monitoring Frequency Mitigation Measure AQ-2: During construction, the construction contractor(s) shall:  Use construction equipment fitted with Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) for all equipment of 50 horsepower or more.  Prior to issuance of any construction permit, ensure that all construction plans submitted to the City of Cupertino Planning Department and/or Building Division clearly show the requirement for Level 3 DPF emissions standards for construction equipment over 50 horsepower.  Maintain a list of all operating equipment in use on the project site for verification by the City of Cupertino Building Division official or his/her designee. The construction equipment list shall state the makes, models, and number of construction equipment on-site.  Ensure that all equipment shall be properly serviced and maintained in accordance with manufacturer recommendations.  Communicate with all sub-contractors in contracts and construction documents that all nonessential idling of construction equipment is restricted to 5 minutes or less in compliance with California Air Resources Board Rule 2449 and is responsible for ensuring that this requirement is met. Applicant During construction City of Cupertino Public Works Planning & Building Department Plan Review and Approval During scheduled construction site inspections BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Mitigation Measure BIO-1: Nests of raptors and other birds shall be protected when in active use, as required by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the California Fish and Game Code. If construction activities and any required tree removal are proposed to occur during the breeding season (February 1 and August 31), the construction contractor shall indicate, on all construction plans, that preconstruction surveys shall:  Be conducted by a qualified biologist prior to tree removal or grading, demolition, or construction activities. Note that preconstruction surveys are not required for tree removal or construction, grading, or demolition activities outside the nesting period. Applicant Prior to construction During construction Qualifying biologist in consultation with California Department of Fish and Wildlife as needed Preconstruction Survey Once for survey; ongoing if nesting birds identified and until they have left the nest THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 5-4 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT TABLE 5-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Party Responsible for Implementation Implementation Timing Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Action Monitoring Frequency  Be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the start of tree removal or construction.  Be repeated at 14-day intervals until construction has been initiated in the area after which surveys can be stopped.  Document locations of active nests containing viable eggs or young birds. Protective measures for active nests containing viable eggs or young birds shall be implemented under the direction of the qualified biologist until the nests no longer contain eggs or young birds. Protective measures shall include:  Establishment of clearly delineated exclusion zones (i.e., demarcated by identifiable fencing, such as orange construction fencing or equivalent) around each nest location as determined by the qualified biologist, taking into account the species of birds nesting, their tolerance for disturbance and proximity to existing development. In general, exclusion zones shall be a minimum of 300 feet for raptors and 75 feet for passerines and other birds.  Monitoring active nests within an exclusion zone on a weekly basis throughout the nesting season to identify signs of disturbance and confirm nesting status.  An increase in the radius of an exclusion zone by the qualified biologist if project activities are determined to be adversely affecting the nesting birds. Exclusion zones may be reduced by the qualified biologist only in consultation with California Department of Fish and Wildlife.  The protection measures shall remain in effect until the young have left the nest and are foraging independently or the nest is no longer active. CULTURAL RESOURCES Mitigation Measure CULT-1: If any prehistoric or historic subsurface cultural resources are discovered during ground-disturbing (including grading, demolition and/or construction) activities: Applicant During construction Consulting archeologist and City of Cupertino Plan Review and Approval As needed if resources are unearthed THE DE ANZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM PLACEWORKS 5-5 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT TABLE 5-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Party Responsible for Implementation Implementation Timing Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Action Monitoring Frequency  All work within 50 feet of the resources shall be halted, the City shall be notified, and a qualified archaeologist shall be consulted. The contractor shall cooperate in the recovery of the materials. Work may proceed on other parts of the project site while mitigation for tribal cultural resources, historical resources or unique archaeological resources is being carried out.  The qualified archaeologist shall prepare a report for the evaluation of the resource to the California Register of Historical Places and the City Building Department. The report shall also include appropriate recommendations regarding the significance of the find and appropriate mitigations as follows: • If the resource is a non-tribal resource, the archaeologist shall assess the significance of the find according to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. • If the resource is a tribal resource – whether historic or prehistoric – the consulting archaeologist shall consult with the appropriate tribe(s) to evaluate the significance of the resource and to recommend appropriate and feasible avoidance, testing, preservation or mitigation measures, in light of factors such as the significance of the find, proposed project design, costs, and other considerations. If avoidance is infeasible, other appropriate measures (e.g., data recovery) may be implemented.  All significant non-tribal cultural materials recovered shall be, as necessary, and at the discretion of the consulting archaeologist, subject to scientific analysis, professional museum curation, and documentation according to current professional standards. Public Works & Building Department GEOLOGY AND SOILS Mitigation Measure GEO-1: The construction contractor shall incorporate the following in all grading, demolition, and construction plans: Applicant During construction City of Cupertino Public Works & Building Department Plan Review and Approval During scheduled construction site inspections THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 5-6 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT TABLE 5-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Party Responsible for Implementation Implementation Timing Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Action Monitoring Frequency  In the event that fossils or fossil-bearing deposits are discovered during grading, demolition, or building, excavations within 50 feet of the find shall be temporarily halted or diverted.  The contractor shall notify the City of Cupertino Building Department and a City-approved qualified paleontologist to examine the discovery.  The paleontologist shall document the discovery as needed, in accordance with Society of Vertebrate Paleontology standards (Society of Vertebrate Paleontology 1995), evaluate the potential resource, and assess the significance of the finding under the criteria set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5.  The paleontologist shall notify the appropriate agencies to determine procedures that would be followed before construction is allowed to resume at the location of the find.  If the project applicant determines that avoidance is not feasible, the paleontologist shall prepare an excavation plan for mitigating the effect of the project based on the qualities that make the resource important. The excavation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to implementation. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Mitigation Measure GHG-1: The project applicant shall offset a minimum of 173 metric tons metric tons of carbon dioxide- equivalent (MTCO2e) emissions per year for a period of 30 years (5,190 MTCO2e) through the purchase of voluntary carbon offsets (i.e., not compliance offsets) from the California Air Resources Board (CARB) approved Offset Project Registries (i.e., Climate Action Reserve, Verra, American Carbon Registry) or forecasted mitigation units (FMUs) (GHG Mitigation Credits) from the Climate Action Reserve’s Climate Forward program. The voluntary carbon offsets or FMUs must be real, additional, permanent, confirmable, and enforceable. The order of preference for purchase of voluntary carbon offsets or FMUs shall be as follows: 1) within the City; 2) within the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin; 3) within the State of California; then 4) elsewhere in the United States. Evidence of payments, and funding of an escrow-type account or endowment Applicant During construction City of Cupertino Planning and Building Department Plan Review and Approval During scheduled construction site inspections THE DE ANZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM PLACEWORKS 5-7 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT TABLE 5-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Party Responsible for Implementation Implementation Timing Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Action Monitoring Frequency fund shall be submitted to the City by the project applicant. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy, the project applicant shall submit to the City of Cupertino Building Division official or his/her designee, the necessary documentation to verify the agreement to purchase the necessary voluntary carbon offsets or FMUs to offset project emissions to below 1,100 MTCO2e per year. NOISE Mitigation Measure NOISE-1: Mitigation Measure NOISE-1: The following shall be incorporated in all demolition, grading, and construction plans, as required by the Cupertino Municipal Code (CMC). Construction activities shall take place only during daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, and 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekends. In addition, the construction crew shall adhere to the following best management practices shall be observed:  At least 90 days prior to the start of any construction, demolition or grading activities, all offsite businesses and residents within 300 feet of the project site will be notified of the planned activities. The notification will include a brief description of the project, the activities that would occur, the hours when activity would occur, and the construction period’s overall duration. The notification should include the telephone numbers of the contractor’s authorized representatives that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint.  The project applicant and contractors shall prepare and submit a Construction Noise Control Plan to the City’s Building Department and Code Enforcement for review and approval prior to issuance of any grading, demolition, and/or building permits. The Construction Noise Plan shall demonstrate compliance with the 80 dBA limit in the CMC. The details of the Construction Noise Control Plan, including those details listed herein, shall be included as part of the permit application drawing set and as part of the construction drawing set, shall be implemented by the on- site Construction Manager, and shall include, but not be limited Applicant Prior to and During construction City of Cupertino Planning and Building Department Plan Review and Approval As needed if resources are unearthed THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 5-8 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT TABLE 5-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Party Responsible for Implementation Implementation Timing Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Action Monitoring Frequency to, the following available controls to comply with the 80 dBA performance standard: • At least 10 days prior to the start of construction activities, a sign will be posted at the entrance(s) to the job site, clearly visible to the public, which includes permitted construction days and hours, as well as the telephone numbers of the City’s and contractor’s authorized representatives that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint. If the authorized contractor’s representative receives a complaint, he/she will investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action to the City. • During the entire active construction period, equipment and trucks used for project construction will utilize the best available noise control techniques (e.g., improved mufflers, equipment re-design, use of intake silencers, ducts, engine enclosures, and acoustically attenuating shields or shrouds), wherever feasible. • Include noise control requirements for equipment and tools, including concrete saws, to the maximum extent feasible. Such requirements could include, but are not limited to, erecting temporary plywood noise barriers between areas where concrete saws will be used and nearby sensitive receptors; performing work in a manner that minimizes noise; and undertaking the noisiest activities during times of least disturbance to nearby sensitive receptors. • During the entire active construction period, stationary noise sources will be located as far from sensitive receptors as possible, and they will be muffled and enclosed within temporary sheds, or insulation barriers or other measures will be incorporated to the extent feasible. • During the entire active construction period, noisy operations will be conducted simultaneously to the degree feasible in order to reduce the time periods of these operations. • Select haul routes that avoid the greatest amount of sensitive use areas and submit to the City of Cupertino Public Works THE DE ANZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM PLACEWORKS 5-9 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT TABLE 5-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Party Responsible for Implementation Implementation Timing Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Action Monitoring Frequency Department for approval prior to the start of the construction phase. • Signs will be posted at the job site entrance(s), within the on- site construction zones, and along queueing lanes (if any) to reinforce the prohibition of unnecessary engine idling. All other equipment will be turned off if not in use for more than 5 minutes. • During the entire active construction period and to the extent feasible, the use of noise producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells will be for safety warning purposes only. The construction manager will use smart back-up alarms, which automatically adjust the alarm level based on the background noise level, or switch off back-up alarms and replace with human spotters in compliance with all safety requirements and laws Mitigation Measure NOISE-2: Mechanical equipment shall be selected and designed to reduce impacts on surrounding uses to meet the Cupertino Municipal Code noise limits of 60 dBA and 50 dBA at residential uses during daytime and nighttime, respectively, and 65 dBA and 55 dBA at non-residential sensitive uses (i.e., the Cupertino Hotel) during daytime and nighttime, respectively. A qualified acoustical consultant shall be retained to review mechanical noise as these systems are selected to determine specific noise reduction measures necessary to reduce noise to comply with the City’s noise level requirements. Mechanical equipment shall be selected and designed to reduce impacts on surrounding uses to meet the City’s noise level requirements. Noise reduction measures could include, but are not limited to:  Selection of equipment that emits low noise levels;  Installation of noise dampening techniques, such as enclosures and parapet walls, to block the line-of-sight between the noise source and the nearest receptors;  Locating equipment in less noise-sensitive areas, where feasible. Applicant Prior to and During construction City of Cupertino Public Works, and Planning and Building Department Plan Review and Approval As needed if resources are unearthed THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 5-10 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT TABLE 5-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Party Responsible for Implementation Implementation Timing Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Action Monitoring Frequency TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Mitigation Measure TCR-1: Implement Mitigation Measure CULT-1. Applicant During construction Consulting archeologist and City of Cupertino Public Works Department Plan Review and Approval As needed if resources are unearthed UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Mitigation Measure UTIL-1: No building permits shall be issued by the City for the proposed De Anza Hotel Project that would result in exceeding the permitted peak wet weather flow capacity of 13.8 mgd through the Santa Clara sanitary sewer system. The project applicant may demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City of Cupertino and Cupertino Sanitary District (CSD), that the proposed hotel would not exceed the peak wet weather flow capacity of the Santa Clara sanitary sewer system by implementing one or more of the following methods: 1) Reduce inflow and infiltration in the CSD system to reduce peak wet weather flows; or 2) Increase on-site water reuse, such as increased grey water use, or reduce water consumption of the fixtures used within the proposed project, or other methods that are measurable and reduce sewer generation rates to acceptable levels, to the satisfaction of the CSD. 3) The proposed project’s estimated wastewater generation shall be calculated using the generation rates used by the San Jose-Santa Clara Water Pollution Control Plant Specific Use Code & Sewer Coefficient table in the May 2007, City of Santa Clara Sanitary Sewer Capacity Assessment,142 and California Green Building Standards, unless alternative Applicant Prior to construction Cupertino Sanitary District, City of Cupertino Public Works and Building Departments Plan Review and Approval During scheduled construction site inspections 142 Mark Thomas and Associates. Email communication with Cupertino Public Works. July 19, 2018. THE DE ANZA PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM PLACEWORKS 5-11 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT TABLE 5-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Party Responsible for Implementation Implementation Timing Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Action Monitoring Frequency (i.e., lower) generation rates achieved by the proposed project are substantiated by the project applicant based on evidence to the satisfaction of the CSD. THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 5-12 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT This page intentionally left blank. PLACEWORKS 6-1 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Organizations and Persons Consulted This Initial Study was prepared by the following consultants and individuals: 6.1.1 LEAD AGENCY CITY OF CUPERTINO Benjamin Fu, Assistant Community Development Director Piu Ghosh, Principal Planner Gian Martire, Associate Planner Chad Mosley, City Engineer Winnie Pagan, Senior Civil Engineer David Stillman, Senior Civil Engineer 6.1.2 REPORT PREPARERS LEAD CONSULTANT PlaceWorks Terri McCracken, Principal-in-Charge Jacqueline Protsman, Project Planner Torina Wilson, Planner Nicole Vermilion, Associate Principal, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Josh Carman, Senior Associate, Noise Specialist Steve Bush, Senior Engineer Grant Reddy, Graphics Specialist TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANT Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Brian Jackson, Senior Associate THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT INITIAL STUDY CITY OF CUPERTINO ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED 6-2 JULY 2, 2019 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT This page intentionally left blank. ........................................................................................................................ APPENDIX A: AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS DATA ........................................................................................................................ Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data 1. Air Quality Ambient air quality standards (AAQS) have been adopted at State and federal levels for criteria air pollutants. In addition, both the State and federal government regulate the release of toxic air contaminants (TACs). The City of San Francisco is in the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB) and is subject to the rules and regulations imposed by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD ), as well as the California AAQS adopted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and national AAQS adopted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Federal, State, regional, and local laws, regulations, plans, or guidelines that are potentially applicable to the proposed project are summarized below. The discussion also identifies the natural factors in the air basin that affect air pollution. 1.1 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 1.1.1 Ambient Air Quality Standards The Clean Air Act (CAA) was passed in 1963 by the U.S. Congress and has been amended several times. The 1970 Clean Air Act amendments strengthened previous legislation and laid the foundation for the regulatory scheme of the 1970s and 1980s. In 1977, Congress again added several provisions, including nonattainment requirements for areas not meeting National AAQS and the Prevention of Significant Deterioration program. The 1990 amendments represent the latest in a series of federal efforts to regulate the protection of air quality in the United States. The CAA allows states to adopt more stringent standards or to include other pollution species. The California Clean Air Act, signed into law in 1988, requires all areas of the State to achieve and maintain the California AAQS by the earliest practical date. The California AAQS tend to be more restrictive than the National AAQS. Criteria air pollutants are the air pollutants for which AAQS have been developed that are regulated under the CAA. The National and California AAQS are the levels of air quality considered to provide a margin of safety in the protection of the public health and welfare. They are designed to protect “sensitive receptors” most susceptible to further respiratory distress, such as asthmatics, the elderly, very young children, people already weakened by other disease or illness, and persons engaged in strenuous work or exercise. Healthy adults can tolerate occasional exposure to air pollutant concentrations considerably above these minimum standards before adverse effects are observed. Both California and the federal government have established health-based AAQS for seven air pollutants, which are shown in Table 1. These pollutants are ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse inhalable particulate matter (PM10), fine inhalable particulate matter (PM2.5), and lead (Pb). In addition, the State has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, vinyl chloride, and visibility-reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. Page 2 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Table 1 Ambient Air Quality Standards for Criteria Pollutants Pollutant Averaging Time California Standard1 Federal Primary Standard2 Major Pollutant Sources Ozone (O3)3 1 hour 0.09 ppm * Motor vehicles, paints, coatings, and solvents. 8 hours 0.070 ppm 0.070 ppm Carbon Monoxide (CO) 1 hour 20 ppm 35 ppm Internal combustion engines, primarily gasoline-powered motor vehicles. 8 hours 9.0 ppm 9 ppm Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Annual Arithmetic Mean 0.030 ppm 0.053 ppm Motor vehicles, petroleum-refining operations, industrial sources, aircraft, ships, and railroads. 1 hour 0.18 ppm 0.100 ppm Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Annual Arithmetic Mean * 0.030 ppm Fuel combustion, chemical plants, sulfur recovery plants, and metal processing. 1 hour 0.25 ppm 0.075 ppm 24 hours 0.04 ppm 0.14 ppm Respirable Coarse Particulate Matter (PM10) Annual Arithmetic Mean 20 µg/m3 * Dust and fume-producing construction, industrial, and agricultural operations, combustion, atmospheric photochemical reactions, and natural activities (e.g., wind- raised dust and ocean sprays). 24 hours 50 µg/m3 150 µg/m3 Respirable Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5)4 Annual Arithmetic Mean 12 µg/m3 12 µg/m3 Dust and fume-producing construction, industrial, and agricultural operations, combustion, atmospheric photochemical reactions, and natural activities (e.g., wind- raised dust and ocean sprays). 24 hours * 35 µg/m3 Lead (Pb) 30-Day Average 1.5 µg/m3 * Present source: lead smelters, battery manufacturing & recycling facilities. Past source: combustion of leaded gasoline. Calendar Quarter * 1.5 µg/m3 Rolling 3-Month Average * 0.15 µg/m3 Sulfates (SO4)5 24 hours 25 µg/m3 * Industrial processes. Visibility Reducing Particles 8 hours ExCo =0.23/km visibility of 10≥ miles No Federal Standard Visibility-reducing particles consist of suspended particulate matter, which is a complex mixture of tiny particles that consists of dry solid fragments, solid cores with liquid coatings, and small droplets of liquid. These particles vary greatly in shape, size and chemical composition, and can be made up of many different materials such as metals, soot, soil, dust, and salt. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 3 Table 1 Ambient Air Quality Standards for Criteria Pollutants Pollutant Averaging Time California Standard1 Federal Primary Standard2 Major Pollutant Sources Hydrogen Sulfide 1 hour 0.03 ppm No Federal Standard Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a colorless gas with the odor of rotten eggs. It is formed during bacterial decomposition of sulfur-containing organic substances. Also, it can be present in sewer gas and some natural gas, and can be emitted as the result of geothermal energy exploitation. Vinyl Chloride 24 hour 0.01 ppm No Federal Standard Vinyl chloride (chloroethene), a chlorinated hydrocarbon, is a colorless gas with a mild, sweet odor. Most vinyl chloride is used to make polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic and vinyl products. Vinyl chloride has been detected near landfills, sewage plants, and hazardous waste sites, due to microbial breakdown of chlorinated solvents. Source: California Air Resources Board, 2017, March, Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Strategy, https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/shortlived/ meetings/03142017/final_slcp_report.pdf, accessed January 3, 2019. Notes: ppm: parts per million; μg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter; * Standard has not been established for this pollutant/duration by this entity. a California standards for O3, CO (except 8-hour Lake Tahoe), SO2 (1 and 24 hour), NO2, and particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5, and visibility reducing particles), are values that are not to be exceeded. All others are not to be equaled or exceeded. California ambient air quality standards are listed in the Table of Standards in Section 70200 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations. b National standards (other than O3, PM, and those based on annual arithmetic mean) are not to be exceeded more than once a year. The O3 standard is attained when the fourth highest 8-hour concentration measured at each site in a year, averaged over three years, is equal to or less than the standard. For PM10, the 24-hour standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with a 24-hour average concentration above 150 µg/m3 is equal to or less than one. For PM2.5, the 24-hour standard is attained when 98 percent of the daily concentrations, averaged over three years, are equal to or less than the standard. c On October 1, 2015, the national 8-hour ozone primary and secondary standards were lowered from 0.075 to 0.070 ppm. d On December 14, 2012, the national annual PM2.5 primary standard was lowered from 15 μg/m3 to 12.0 µg/m3. The existing national 24-hour PM2.5 standards (primary and secondary) were retained at 35 µg/m3, as was the annual secondary standard of 15 µg/m3. The existing 24-hour PM10 standards (primary and secondary) of 150 µg/m3 also were retained. The form of the annual primary and secondary standards is the annual mean, averaged over 3 years. e On June 2, 2010, a new 1-hour SO2 standard was established and the existing 24-hour and annual primary standards were revoked. The 1-hour national standard is in units of parts per billion (ppb). California standards are in units of parts per million (ppm). To directly compare the 1-hour national standard to the California standard the units can be converted to ppm. In this case, the national standard of 75 ppb is identical to 0.075 ppm. California has also adopted a host of other regulations that reduce criteria pollutant emissions, including:  AB 1493: Pavley Fuel Efficiency Standards  Title 20 California Code of Regulations (CCR): Appliance Energy Efficiency Standards  Title 24, Part 6, CCR: Building and Energy Efficiency Standards  Title 24, Part 11, CCR: Green Building Standards Code 1.1.2 Air Pollutants of Concern A substance in the air that can cause harm to humans and the environment is known as an air pollutant. Pollutants can be in the form of solid particles, liquid droplets, or gases. In addition, they may be natural or man-made. 1.1.2.1 CRITERIA AIR POLLUTANTS The pollutants emitted into the ambient air by stationary and mobile sources are regulated by federal and State law. Air pollutants are categorized as primary and/or secondary pollutants. Primary air pollutants are emitted directly from sources. Carbon monoxide (CO), reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrogen oxides (NOx), Page 4 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse inhalable particulate matter (PM10), fine inhalable particulate matter (PM2.5), and lead (Pb) are primary air pollutants. Of these, CO, SO2, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), PM10, and PM2.5 are “criteria air pollutants,” which means that AAQS have been established for them. ROG and NOx are criteria pollutant precursors that form secondary criteria air pollutants through chemical and photochemical reactions in the atmosphere. Ozone (O3) and NO2 are the principal secondary pollutants. A description of each of the primary and secondary criteria air pollutants and their known health effects is presented below.  Carbon Monoxide (CO) is a colorless, odorless, toxic gas produced by incomplete combustion of carbon substances, such as gasoline or diesel fuel. CO is a primary criteria air pollutant. CO concentrations tend to be the highest during winter mornings with little or no wind, when surface- based inversions trap the pollutant at ground levels. Because CO is emitted directly from internal combustion engines, motor vehicles operating at slow speeds are the primary source of CO in the air basin. Emissions are highest during cold starts, hard acceleration, stop-and-go driving, and when a vehicle is moving at low speeds. New findings indicate that CO emissions per mile are lowest at about 45 miles per hour (mph) for the average light-duty motor vehicle and begin to increase again at higher speeds. When inhaled at high concentrations, CO combines with hemoglobin in the blood and reduces its oxygen-carrying capacity 1. This results in reduced oxygen reaching the brain, heart, and other body tissues. This condition is especially critical for people with cardiovascular diseases, chronic lung disease, or anemia, as well as for fetuses. Even healthy people exposed to high CO concentrations can experience headaches, dizziness, fatigue, unconsciousness, and even death.2 The air basin is designated under the California and National AAQS as being in attainment of CO criteria levels.3  Reactive Organic Gases (ROGs) are compounds composed primarily of hydrogen and carbon atoms. Internal combustion associated with motor vehicle usage is the major source of ROGs. Other sources include evaporative emissions from paints and solvents, the application of asphalt paving, and the use of household consumer products such as aerosols. Adverse effects on human health are not caused directly by ROGs, but rather by reactions of ROGs to form secondary pollutants such as O3. There are no AAQS established for ROGs. However, because they contribute to the formation of O3, BAAQMD has established a significance threshold for this pollutant.  Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) are a by-product of fuel combustion and contribute to the formation of O3, PM10, and PM2.5. The two major components of NOx are nitric oxide (NO) and NO2. The principal component of NOx produced by combustion is NO, but NO reacts with oxygen to form NO2, creating the mixture of NO and NO2 commonly called NOx. NO2 is an acute irritant and at equal concentrations more injurious than NO. At atmospheric concentrations, however, NO2 is only potentially irritating. There is some indication of a relationship between NO2 and chronic pulmonary fibrosis. Some increase in bronchitis in children (two and three years old) has also been observed at concentrations below 0.3 parts per million (ppm). NO2 absorbs blue light; the result is a brownish- red cast to the atmosphere and reduced visibility. NO is a colorless, odorless gas formed from 1 US Environmental Protection Agency. 2017, April 7. Six Common Air Pollutants. https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants. 2 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017, May. Appendix C: Sample Air Quality Setting, in California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. 3 California Air Resources Board, 2017, October. Area Designations Maps: State and National. http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 5 atmospheric nitrogen and oxygen when combustion takes place under high temperature and/or high pressure.4,5 The air basin is designated an attainment area for NO2 under the National AAQS and California AAQS.6  Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) is a colorless, pungent, irritating gas formed by the combustion of sulfurous fossil fuels. It enters the atmosphere as a result of burning high-sulfur-content fuel oils and coal and from chemical processes at chemical plants and refineries. Gasoline and natural gas have very low sulfur content and do not release significant quantities of SO2. When SO2 forms sulfates (SO4) in the atmosphere, together these pollutants are referred to as sulfur oxides (SOx). Thus, SO2 is both a primary and secondary criteria air pollutant. At sufficiently high concentrations, SO2 may irritate the upper respiratory tract. At lower concentrations and when combined with particulates, SO2 may do greater harm by injuring lung tissue.7 The air basin is designated an attainment area for SO2 under the California and National AAQS.8  Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5) consists of finely divided solids or liquids such as soot, dust, aerosols, fumes, and mists. Two forms of fine particulates are now recognized and regulated. Inhalable coarse particles, or PM10, include the particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 microns (i.e., 10 millionths of a meter or 0.0004-inch) or less. Inhalable fine particles, or PM2.5, have an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 microns or less (i.e., 2.5 millionths of a meter or 0.0001 inch). Some particulate matter, such as pollen, occurs naturally. Most particulate matter in the air basin is caused by combustion, factories, construction, grading, demolition, agricultural activities, and motor vehicles. Extended exposure to particulate matter can increase the risk of chronic respiratory disease. PM10 bypasses the body’s natural filtration system more easily than larger particles and can lodge deep in the lungs. An EPA scientific review concluded that PM2.5 penetrates even more deeply into the lungs, and this is more likely to contribute to health effects—at concentrations well below current PM10 standards. These health effects include premature death in people with heart or lung disease, nonfatal heart attacks, irregular heartbeat, aggravated asthma, decreased lung function, increased respiratory symptoms (e.g. irritation of the airways, coughing, or difficulty breathing). Motor vehicles are currently responsible for about half of particulates in the air basin. Wood burning in fireplaces and stoves is another large source of fine particulates.9  Both PM10 and PM2.5 may adversely affect the human respiratory system, especially in people who are naturally sensitive or susceptible to breathing problems. These health effects include premature death and increased hospital admissions and emergency room visits (primarily the elderly and individuals with cardiopulmonary disease); increased respiratory symptoms and disease (children and individual with asthma); and alterations in lung tissue and structure and in respiratory tract defense 4 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017, May. Appendix C: Sample Air Quality Setting, in California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. 5 US Environmental Protection Agency. 2017, April 7. Six Common Air Pollutants. https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants. 6 California Air Resources Board, 2017, October. Area Designations Maps: State and National. http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. 7 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017, May. Appendix C: Sample Air Quality Setting, in California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. 8 California Air Resources Board, 2017, October. Area Designations Maps: State and National. http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. 9 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017, May. Appendix C: Sample Air Quality Setting, in California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. Page 6 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data mechanisms.10 Diesel particulate matter (DPM) is classified a carcinogen by CARB. The air basin is designated nonattainment under the California AAQS for PM10 and nonattainment under both the California and National AAQS for PM2.5.11,12  Ozone (O3) is commonly referred to as “smog” and is a gas that is formed when ROGs and NOx,— both by-products of internal combustion engine exhaust—undergo photochemical reactions in the presence of sunlight. O3 is a secondary criteria air pollutant. O3 concentrations are generally highest during the summer months when direct sunlight, light winds, and warm temperatures create favorable conditions to the formation of this pollutant. O3 poses a health threat to those who already suffer from respiratory diseases as well as to healthy people. O3 levels usually build up during the day and peak in the afternoon. Short-term exposure can irritate the eyes and cause constriction of the airways. Besides causing shortness of breath, it can aggravate existing respiratory diseases such as asthma, bronchitis, and emphysema. Chronic exposure to high ozone levels can permanently damage lung tissue. O3 can also damage plants and trees and materials such as rubber and fabrics.13 The air basin is designated nonattainment of the 1-hour California AAQS and 8-hour California and National AAQS for O3.14  Lead (Pb) is a metal found naturally in the environment as well as in manufactured products. The major sources of lead emissions have historically been mobile and industrial sources. As a result of the phase-out of leaded gasoline, metal processing is currently the primary source of lead emissions. The highest levels of lead in air are generally found near lead smelters. Other stationary sources are waste incinerators, utilities, and lead-acid battery manufacturers. Twenty years ago, mobile sources were the main contributor to ambient lead concentrations in the air. In the early 1970s, the EPA set national regulations to gradually reduce the lead content in gasoline. In 1975, unleaded gasoline was introduced for motor vehicles equipped with catalytic converters. The EPA banned the use of leaded gasoline in highway vehicles in December 1995. As a result of the EPA’s regulatory efforts to remove lead from gasoline, emissions of lead from the transportation sector and levels of lead in the air decreased dramatically.15 The air basin is designated in attainment of the California and National AAQS for lead.16 Because emissions of lead are found only in projects that are permitted by BAAQMD, lead is not an air quality of concern for the proposed project. 10 South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2005. Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning. 11 California Air Resources Board, 2017, October. Area Designations Maps: State and National. http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. 12 On January 9, 2013, the EPA issued a final rule to determine that the SFBAAB has attained the 24-hour PM2.5 National AAQS. This action suspends federal State Implementation Plan planning requirements for the Bay Area. The SFBAAB will continue to be designated nonattainment for the National 24-hour PM2.5 standard until such time as BAAQMD elects to submit a redesignation request and a maintenance plan to EPA and EPA approves the proposed redesignation. 13 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017, May. Appendix C: Sample Air Quality Setting, in California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. 14 California Air Resources Board, 2017, October. Area Designations Maps: State and National. http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm 15 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017, May. Appendix C: Sample Air Quality Setting, in California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. 16 California Air Resources Board, 2017, October. Area Designations Maps: State and National. http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 7 1.1.2.2 TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS Public exposure to TACs is a significant environmental health issue in California. In 1983, the California Legislature enacted a program to identify the health effects of TACs and reduce exposure to these contaminants to protect the public health. The California Health and Safety Code defines a TAC as “an air pollutant which may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality or in serious illness, or which may pose a present or potential hazard to human health.” A substance that is listed as a hazardous air pollutant pursuant to Section 112(b) of the federal Clean Air Act (42 U.S. Code Section 7412[b]) is a toxic air contaminant. Under State law, the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA), acting through CARB, is authorized to identify a substance as a TAC if it is an air pollutant that may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality or serious illness, or may pose a present or potential hazard to human health. California regulates TACs primarily through AB 1807 (Tanner Air Toxics Act) and AB 2588 (Air Toxics “Hot Spot” Information and Assessment Act of 1987). The Tanner Air Toxics Act sets up a formal procedure for CARB to designate substances as TACs. Once a TAC is identified, CARB adopts an “airborne toxics control measure” for sources that emit designated TACs. If there is a safe threshold for a substance (i.e. a point below which there is no toxic effect), the control measure must reduce exposure to below that threshold. If there is no safe threshold, the measure must incorporate toxics best available control technology to minimize emissions. To date, CARB has established formal control measures for 11 TACs that it identified as having no safe threshold. Air toxics from stationary sources are also regulated in California under the Air Toxics “Hot Spot” Information and Assessment Act of 1987. Under AB 2588, TAC emissions from individual facilities are quantified and prioritized by the air quality management district or air pollution control district. High priority facilities are required to perform a health risk assessment and, if specific thresholds are exceeded, are required to communicate the results to the public through notices and public meetings. At the time of the last update to the TAC list in December 1999, CARB had designated 244 compounds as TACs.17 Additionally, CARB has implemented control measures for a number of compounds that pose high risks and show potential for effective control. The majority of the estimated health risks from TACs can be attributed to relatively few compounds, the most important being particulate matter from diesel-fueled engines. In 1998, CARB identified DPM as a TAC. Previously, the individual chemical compounds in diesel exhaust were considered TACs. Almost all diesel exhaust particles are 10 microns or less in diameter. Because of their extremely small size, these particles can be inhaled and eventually trapped in the bronchial and alveolar regions of the lungs. CARB has promulgated the following specific rules to limit TAC emissions:  13 CCR Chapter 10, Section 2485, Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Limit Diesel-Fueled Commercial Motor Vehicle Idling  13 CCR Chapter 10, Section 2480, Airborne Toxic Control Measure to Limit School Bus Idling and Idling at Schools 17 California Air Resources Board , 1999. Final Staff Report: Update to the Toxic Air Contaminant List. Page 8 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data  13 CCR Section 2477 and Article 8, Airborne Toxic Control Measure for In-Use Diesel-Fueled Transport Refrigeration Units (TRU) and TRU Generator Sets and Facilities Where TRUs Operate In addition, to reduce exposure to TACs, CARB developed and approved the Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective to provide guidance regarding the siting of sensitive land uses in the vicinity of freeways, distribution centers, rail yards, ports, refineries, chrome-plating facilities, dry cleaners, and gasoline-dispensing facilities.18 This guidance document was developed to assess compatibility and associated health risks when placing sensitive receptors near existing pollution sources. CARB’s recommendations on the siting of new sensitive land uses were based on a compilation of recent studies that evaluated data on the adverse health effects from proximity to air pollution sources. The key observation in these studies is that proximity to air pollution sources substantially increases exposure and the potential for adverse health effects. There are three carcinogenic toxic air contaminants that constitute the majority of the known health risks from motor vehicle traffic, DPM from trucks, and benzene and 1,3 butadiene from passenger vehicles. CARB recommendations are based on data that show that localized air pollution exposures can be reduced by as much as 80 percent by following CARB minimum distance separations. 1.1.3 Bay Area Air Quality Management District BAAQMD is the agency responsible for assuring that the National and California AAQS are attained and maintained in the SFBAAB. BAAQMD is responsible for:  Adopting and enforcing rules and regulations concerning air pollutant sources.  Issuing permits for stationary sources of air pollutants.  Inspecting stationary sources of air pollutants.  Responding to citizen complaints.  Monitoring ambient air quality and meteorological conditions.  Awarding grants to reduce motor vehicle emissions.  Conducting public education campaigns.  Air quality management planning. Air quality conditions in the air basin have improved significantly since the BAAQMD was created in 1955.19 The BAAQMD prepares air quality management plans (AQMPs) to attain ambient air quality standards in the SFBAAB. The BAAQMD prepares ozone attainment plans (OAPs) for the National O3 standard and clean air plans for the California O3 standard. The BAAQMD prepares these AQMPs in coordination with the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). The most recent adopted comprehensive plan is the 2017 Clean Air Plan, which was adopted on April 19, 2017, and incorporates significant new scientific data, primarily in the form of updated emissions inventories, ambient measurements, new meteorological episodes, and new air quality modeling tools. 18 California Air Resources Board. 2005, April. Air Quality Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. 19 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017, May. Appendix C: Sample Air Quality Setting, in California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 9 1.1.3.1 BAAQMD BAY AREA CLEAN AIR PLAN 2017 Spare the Air, Cool the Climate: A Blueprint for Clean Air and Climate Protection in the Bay Area BAAQMD adopted the 2017 Clean Air Plan, Spare the Air, Cool the Climate (2017 Clean Air Plan) on April 19, 2017. The 2017 Plan serves as an update to the adopted Bay Area 2010 Clean Air Plan and continues in providing the framework for SFBAAB to achieve attainment of the California and National AAQS. Similar to the Bay Area 2010 Clean Air Plan, the 2017 Clean Air Plan updates the Bay Area’s ozone plan, which is based on the “all feasible measures” approach to meet the requirements of the California CAA. Additionally, it sets a goal of reducing health risk impacts to local communities by 20 percent by 2020. Furthermore, the 2017 Clean Air Plan also lays the groundwork for reducing GHG emissions in the Bay Area to meet the state’s 2030 GHG reduction target and 2050 GHG reduction goal. It also includes a vision for the Bay Area in a post-carbon year 2050 that encompasses the following 20:  Construct buildings that are energy efficient and powered by renewable energy.  Walk, bicycle, and use public transit for the majority of trips and use electric-powered autonomous public transit fleets.  Incubate and produce clean energy technologies.  Live a low-carbon lifestyle by purchasing low-carbon foods and goods in addition to recycling and putting organic waste to productive use. A comprehensive multipollutant control strategy has been developed to be implemented in the next three to five years to address public health and climate change and to set a pathway to achieve the 2050 vision. The control strategy includes 85 control measures to reduce emissions of ozone, particulate matter, TACs, and GHG from a full range of emission sources. These control measures cover the following sectors: 1) stationary (industrial) sources; 2) transportation; 3) energy; 4) agriculture; 5) natural and working lands; 6) waste management; 7) water; and 8) super-GHG pollutants. Overall, the proposed control strategy is based on the following key priorities:  Reduce emissions of criteria air pollutants and toxic air contaminants from all key sources.  Reduce emissions of “super-GHGs” such as methane, black carbon, and fluorinated gases.  Decrease demand for fossil fuels (gasoline, diesel, and natural gas).  Increase efficiency of the energy and transportation systems.  Reduce demand for vehicle travel, and high-carbon goods and services.  Decarbonize the energy system.  Make the electricity supply carbon-free.  Electrify the transportation and building sectors. 20 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017, April 19. Final 2017 Clean Air Plan, Spare the Air, Cool the Climate: A Blueprint for Clean Air and Climate Protection in the Bay Area. http://www.baaqmd.gov/plans-and-climate/air-quality-plans/plans-under- development. Page 10 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data 1.1.3.2 BAAQMD’S COMMUNITY AIR RISK EVALUATION PROGRAM (CARE) The BAAQMD’s Community Air Risk Evaluation (CARE) program was initiated in 2004 to evaluate and reduce health risks associated with exposure to outdoor TACs in the Bay Area. Based on findings of the latest report, DPM was found to account for approximately 85 percent of the cancer risk from airborne toxics. Carcinogenic compounds from gasoline-powered cars and light duty trucks were also identified as significant contributors: 1,3-butadiene contributed 4 percent of the cancer risk-weighted emissions, and benzene contributed 3 percent. Collectively, five compounds—DPM, 1,3-butadiene, benzene, formaldehyde, and acetaldehyde—were found to be responsible for more than 90 percent of the cancer risk attributed to emissions. All of these compounds are associated with emissions from internal combustion engines. The most important sources of cancer risk–weighted emissions were combustion-related sources of DPM, including on-road mobile sources (31 percent), construction equipment (29 percent), and ships and harbor craft (13 percent). A 75 percent reduction in DPM was predicted between 2005 and 2015 when the inventory accounted for CARB’s diesel regulations. Overall, cancer risk from TACs dropped by more than 50 percent between 2005 and 2015, when emissions inputs accounted for State diesel regulations and other reductions.21 Modeled cancer risks from TAC in 2005 were highest near sources of DPM: near core urban areas, along major roadways and freeways, and near maritime shipping terminals. The highest modeled risks were found east of San Francisco, near West Oakland, and the Maritime Port of Oakland. BAAQMD has identified seven impacted communities in the Bay Area: 1. Western Contra Costa County and the cities of Richmond and San Pablo 2. Western Alameda County along the Interstate 880 (I-880) corridor and the cities of Berkeley, Alameda, Oakland, and Hayward 3. San Jose 4. Eastern side of San Francisco 5. Concord 6. Vallejo 7. Pittsburgh and Antioch The project site is not within a CARE-program impacted community. The major contributor to acute and chronic non-cancer health effects in the air basin is acrolein (C3H4O). Major sources of acrolein are on-road mobile sources and aircraft near freeways and commercial and military airports.22 Currently CARB does not have certified emission factors or an analytical test method for acrolein. 21 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2014. Improving Air Quality & Health in Bay Area Communities, Community Air Risk Program (CARE) Retrospective and Path Forward (2004–2013), April. 22 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2006. Community Air Risk Evaluation Program, Phase I Findings and Policy Recommendations Related to Toxic Air Contaminants in the San Francisco Bay Area. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 11 Since the appropriate tools needed to implement and enforce acrolein emission limits are not available, the BAAQMD does not conduct health risk screening analysis for acrolein emissions.23 1.1.3.3 REGULATION 7, ODOROUS SUBSTANCES Sources of objectionable odors may occur within the City. BAAQMD’s Regulation 7, Odorous Substances, places general limitations on odorous substances and specific emission limitations on certain odorous compounds. Odors are also regulated under BAAQMD Regulation 1, Rule 1-301, Public Nuisance, which states that “no person shall discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or the public; or which endangers the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which causes, or has a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property.” Under BAAQMD’s Rule 1-301, a facility that receives three or more violation notices within a 30-day period can be declared a public nuisance. 1.1.3.4 OTHER BAAQMD REGULATIONS In addition to the plans and programs described above, BAAQMD administers a number of specific regulations on various sources of pollutant emissions that would apply to individual development projects allowed under the proposed General Plan, including:  BAAQMD, Regulation 2, Rule 2, New Source Review  BAAQMD, Regulation 2, Rule 5, New Source Review of Toxic Air Contaminants  BAAQMD Regulation 6, Rule 1, General Requirements  BAAQMD Regulation 6, Rule 2, Commercial Cooking Equipment  BAAQMD Regulation 8, Rule 3, Architectural Coatings  BAAQMD Regulation 8, Rule 4, General Solvent and Surface Coatings Operations  BAAQMD Regulation 8, Rule 7, Gasoline Dispensing Facilities  BAAQMD Regulation 11, Rule 2, Asbestos, Demolition, Renovation and Manufacturing) 1.1.4 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) is the congestion management agency for Santa Clara County. VTA is tasked with developing a comprehensive transportation improvement program among local jurisdictions that will reduce traffic congestion and improve land use decision-making and air quality. VTA’s latest congestion management program (CMP) is the 2017 Congestion Management Program Document. VTA’s countywide transportation model must be consistent with the regional transportation model developed by the MTC with ABAG data. The countywide transportation model is used to help evaluate cumulative transportation impacts of local land use decisions on the CMP system. In addition, VTA’s updated CMP includes multi-modal performance standards and trip reduction and transportation demand management strategies consistent with the goal of reducing regional vehicle miles traveled in accordance with Senate Bill 375. The 2017 CMP also includes a discussion of Senate Bill 743 implementation and relationship to the 23 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2010. Air Toxics NSR Program, Health Risk Screening Analysis Guidelines. Page 12 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data CMP auto level of service standard. Elements discussed in the 2017 CMP for Santa Clara County, include the following:  Transportation Analysis Standards Element:  Monitor and submit report on the level of service on CMP roadway network intersections using CMP software and procedures  Monitor performance of CMP rural highways and freeways.  Multimodal Performance Measures Element:  Collect available transportation performance measurement data for use in land use analysis, deficiency plans and the CIP.  Transportation Model and Database Element:  Certify that the CMP model us consistent with the regional model.  Certify that member agency models are consistent with the CMP model.  Land Use Impact Analysis Element:  Prepare a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) for projects that generate 100 or more peak hour trips and submit to the CMP according to TIA Guidelines schedule.  Submit relevant conditions of approval to VTA for projects generating TIAs.  Prepare quarterly report on VTA comments and local agency adopted conditions for VTA Board, Congestion Management Program and Planning Committee, Policy Advisory Committee, Technical Advisory Committee, Citizens Advisory Committee, and Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee.  Prepare and submit land use monitoring data to the CMP on all land use projects approved from July 1 to June 30 of the previous year.  Capital Improvement Program Element:  Develop a list of projects intended to maintain or improve the level of service on the designated system and to maintain transit performance standards.  Monitoring and Conformance Element:  Outline the requirements and procedures established for conducting annual traffic LOS and land use monitoring efforts. Support the Traffic Level of Service and Community Form and Impact Analysis Elements.  Multimodal Improvement Plan Element:  Prepare deficiency plans for facilities that violate CMP traffic LOS standards or that are projected to violate LOS standards using the adopted deficiency plan requirements.  Submit Deficiency Plan Implementation Status Report as part of annual monitoring. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 13 1.1.5 Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program Under Air District Regulation 14, Model Source Emissions Reduction Measures, Rule 1, Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program, employers with 50 or more full-time employees within the Air District are required to register and offer commuter benefits to employees. In partnership with the Air District and the MTC, the rule’s purpose is to improve air quality, reduce GHG emissions, and decrease the Bay Area’s traffic congestion by encouraging employees to use alternative commute modes, such as transit, vanpool, carpool, bicycling, and walking. The benefits program allows employees to choose from one of four commuter benefit options including a pre-tax benefit, employer-provided subsidy, employer-provided transit, and alternative commute benefit. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 1.1.6 San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin The BAAQMD is the regional air quality agency for the SFBAAB, which comprises all of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara counties; the southern portion of Sonoma County; and the southwestern portion of Solano County. Air quality in this area is determined by such natural factors as topography, meteorology, and climate, in addition to the presence of existing air pollution sources and ambient conditions.24 1.1.6.1 METEOROLOGY The SFBAAB is characterized by complex terrain, consisting of coastal mountain ranges, inland valleys, and bays, which distort normal wind flow patterns. The Coast Range splits, resulting in a western coast gap, Golden Gate, and an eastern coast gap, Carquinez Strait, which allow air to flow in and out of the SFBAAB and the Central Valley. The climate is dominated by the strength and location of a semi-permanent, subtropical high-pressure cell. During the summer, the Pacific high-pressure cell is centered over the northeastern Pacific Ocean, resulting in stable meteorological conditions and a steady northwesterly wind flow. Upwelling of cold ocean water from below the surface because of the northwesterly flow produces a band of cold water off the California coast. The cool and moisture-laden air approaching the coast from the Pacific Ocean is further cooled by the presence of the cold water band, resulting in condensation and the presence of fog and stratus clouds along the Northern California coast. In the winter, the Pacific high-pressure cell weakens and shifts southward, resulting in wind flow offshore, the absence of upwelling, and the occurrence of storms. Weak inversions coupled with moderate winds result in a low air pollution potential. 1.1.6.2 WIND PATTERNS During the summer, winds flowing from the northwest are drawn inland through the Golden Gate and over the lower portions of the San Francisco Peninsula. Immediately south of Mount Tamalpais, the northwesterly winds accelerate considerably and come more directly from the west as they stream through the Golden Gate. 24 This section describing the air basin is from Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 2017, May, Appendix C: Sample Air Quality Setting, in California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. Page 14 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data This channeling of wind through the Golden Gate produces a jet that sweeps eastward and splits off to the northwest toward Richmond and to the southwest toward San Jose when it meets the East Bay hills. Wind speeds may be strong locally in areas where air is channeled through a narrow opening, such as the Carquinez Strait, the Golden Gate, or the San Bruno gap. For example, the average wind speed at San Francisco International Airport in July is about 17 knots (from 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.), compared with only 7 knots at San Jose and less than 6 knots at the Farallon Islands. The air flowing in from the coast to the Central Valley, called the sea breeze, begins developing at or near ground level along the coast in late morning or early afternoon. As the day progresses, the sea breeze layer deepens and increases in velocity while spreading inland. The depth of the sea breeze depends in large part upon the height and strength of the inversion. If the inversion is low and strong, and hence stable, the flow of the sea breeze will be inhibited and stagnant conditions are likely to result. In the winter, the SFBAAB frequently experiences stormy conditions with moderate to strong winds, as well as periods of stagnation with very light winds. Winter stagnation episodes are characterized by nighttime drainage flows in coastal valleys. Drainage is a reversal of the usual daytime air-flow patterns; air moves from the Central Valley toward the coast and back down toward the Bay from the smaller valleys within the SFBAAB. 1.1.6.3 TEMPERATURE Summertime temperatures in the SFBAAB are determined in large part by the effect of differential heating between land and water surfaces. Because land tends to heat up and cool off more quickly than water, a large- scale gradient (differential) in temperature is often created between the coast and the Central Valley, and small-scale local gradients are often produced along the shorelines of the ocean and bays. The temperature gradient near the ocean is also exaggerated, especially in summer, because of the upwelling of cold water from the ocean bottom along the coast. On summer afternoons the temperatures at the coast can be 35 degrees Fahrenheit (ºF) cooler than temperatures 15 to 20 miles inland. At night this contrast usually decreases to less than 10ºF. In the winter, the relationship of minimum and maximum temperatures is reversed. During the daytime the temperature contrast between the coast and inland areas is small, whereas at night the variation in temperature is large. 1.1.6.4 PRECIPITATION The SFBAAB is characterized by moderately wet winters and dry summers. Winter rains (November through March) account for about 75 percent of the average annual rainfall. The amount of annual precipitation can vary greatly from one part of the SFBAAB to another, even within short distances. In general, total annual rainfall can reach 40 inches in the mountains, but it is often less than 16 inches in sheltered valleys. During rainy periods, ventilation (rapid horizontal movement of air and injection of cleaner air) and vertical mixing (an upward and downward movement of air) are usually high, and thus pollution levels tend to be low (i.e. air pollutants are dispersed more readily into the atmosphere rather than accumulate under stagnant conditions). However, during the winter, frequent dry periods do occur, when mixing and ventilation are low and pollutant levels build up. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 15 1.1.6.5 WIND CIRCULATION Low wind speed contributes to the buildup of air pollution because it allows more pollutants to be emitted into the air mass per unit of time. Light winds occur most frequently during periods of low sun (fall and winter, and early morning) and at night. These are also periods when air pollutant emissions from some sources are at their peak, namely, commuter traffic (early morning) and wood-burning appliances (nighttime). The problem can be compounded in valleys, when weak flows carry the pollutants up-valley during the day, and cold air drainage flows move the air mass down-valley at night. Such restricted movement of trapped air provides little opportunity for ventilation and leads to buildup of pollutants to potentially unhealthful levels. 1.1.6.6 INVERSIONS An inversion is a layer of warmer air over a layer of cooler air. Inversions affect air quality conditions significantly because they influence the mixing depth, i.e. the vertical depth in the atmosphere available for diluting air contaminants near the ground. There are two types of inversions that occur regularly in the SFBAAB. Elevation inversions are more common in the summer and fall, and radiation inversions are more common during the winter. The highest air pollutant concentrations in the SFBAAB generally occur during inversions. 1.1.7 Existing Ambient Air Quality 1.1.7.1 ATTAINMENT STATUS OF THE SFBAAB Areas that meet AAQS are classified attainment areas, and areas that do not meet these standards are classified nonattainment areas. Severity classifications for O3 range from marginal, moderate, and serious to severe and extreme. The attainment status for the air basin is shown in Table 2. The air basin is currently designated a nonattainment area for California and National O3, California and National PM2.5, and California PM10 AAQS. Table 2 Attainment Status of Criteria Pollutants in the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin Pollutant State Federal Ozone – 1-hour Nonattainment Classification revoked (2005) Ozone – 8-hour Nonattainment (serious) Nonattainment PM10 Nonattainment Unclassified/Attainment PM2.5 Nonattainment Unclassified/Attainment1 CO Attainment Attainment NO2 Attainment Unclassified SO2 Attainment Attainment Lead Attainment Attainment Sulfates Attainment Unclassified/Attainment All others Unclassified/Attainment Unclassified/Attainment Source: California Air Resources Board, 2017, October. Area Designations Maps: State and National. http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. 1 In December 2014, US EPA issued final area designations for the 2012 primary annual PM2.5 National AAQS. Areas designated “unclassifiable/attainment” must continue to take steps to prevent their air quality from deteriorating to unhealthy levels. The effective date of this standard is April 15, 2015 (Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017, January 5. Air Quality Standards and Attainment Status. http://www.baaqmd.gov/research-and-data/air-quality-standards-and-attainment-status). Page 16 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data 1.1.7.2 EXISTING AMBIENT AIR QUALITY Existing levels of ambient air quality and historical trends and projections in the vicinity of the project site are best documented by measurements made by the BAAQMD. The BAAQMD monitoring station closest to the project site is the San Jose – Jackson Street Avenue Monitoring Station. Data from this station is summarized in Table 3. The data show occasional violations of the State and federal O3 standards, as well as state PM10 and federal PM2.5 standards. The State and federal CO and NO2 standards have not been exceeded in the last five years in the vicinity of the project site. Table 3 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Summary Pollutant/Standard Number of Days Threshold Were Exceeded and Maximum Levels during Such Violations 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Ozone (O3) State 1-Hour ≥ 0.09 ppm State 8-hour ≥ 0.07 ppm Federal 8-Hour > 0.075 ppm Maximum 1-Hour Conc. (ppm) Maximum 8-Hour Conc. (ppm) 0 1 1 0.093 0.079 0 0 0 0.089 0.066 0 2 2 0.094 0.065 0 0 0 0.087 0.066 0 4 3 0.121 0.098 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) State 1-Hour ≥ 0.18 (ppm) Maximum 1-Hour Conc. (ppb) 0 58.7 0 58.4 0 49.3 0 51.1 0 67.5 Coarse Particulates (PM10) State 24-Hour > 50 µg/m3 Federal 24-Hour > 150 µg/m3 Maximum 24-Hour Conc. (µg/m3) 5 0 55.8 1 0 56.4 1 0 58.8 0 0 40.0 6 0 69.4 Fine Particulates (PM2.5) Federal 24-Hour > 35 µg/m3 Maximum 24-Hour Conc. (µg/m3) 6 57.7 2 60.4 2 49.4 0 22.6 6 49.7 Source: California Air Resources Board, 2015, Air Pollution Data Monitoring Cards (2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016), Accessed January 4, 2019, http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/index.html. Data from the San Jose Jackson Street Monitoring Station for 03, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5. Notes: ppm: parts per million; ppb: parts per billion; µg/m3: or micrograms per cubic meter 1.1.7.3 EXISTING EMISSIONS The project site is currently developed with an 8,323 square foot Good Year Auto Service Center building. The current site uses generate criteria air pollutants emissions from energy use, transportation, and area sources associated with the operation of the Auto Service Center. 1.1.8 Sensitive Receptors Some land uses are considered more sensitive to air pollution than others due to the types of population groups or activities involved. Sensitive population groups include children, the elderly, the acutely ill, and the chronically ill, especially those with cardiorespiratory diseases. Residential areas are also considered sensitive receptors to air pollution because residents (including children and the elderly) tend to be at home for extended periods of time, resulting in sustained exposure to any pollutants present. Other sensitive receptors include retirement facilities, hospitals, and schools. Recreational land uses are considered moderately sensitive to air pollution. Although exposure periods are generally short, exercise places a high demand on respiratory Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 17 functions, which can be impaired by air pollution. In addition, noticeable air pollution can detract from the enjoyment of recreation. Industrial, commercial, retail, and office areas are considered the least sensitive to air pollution. Exposure periods are relatively short and intermittent, since the majority of the workers tend to stay indoors most of the time. In addition, the working population is generally the healthiest segment of the population. The nearest sensitive receptors are the multi-family residences at the Aviare Apartments to the east of the project site. These residences are approximately 140 feet east of the project site. 1.2 METHODOLOGY The BAAQMD “CEQA Air Quality Guidelines” were prepared to assist in the evaluation of air quality impacts of projects and plans proposed in the Bay Area. The guidelines provide recommended procedures for evaluating potential air impacts during the environmental review process, consistent with CEQA requirements, and include recommended thresholds of significance, mitigation measures, and background air quality information. They also include recommended assessment methodologies for air toxics, odors, and greenhouse gas emissions. In June 2010, the BAAQMD's Board of Directors adopted CEQA thresholds of significance and an update of the CEQA Guidelines. In May 2011, the updated BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines were amended to include a risk and hazards threshold for new receptors and modified procedures for assessing impacts related to risk and hazard impacts; however, this later amendment regarding risk and hazards was the subject of the December 17, 2015 Supreme Court decision (California Building Industry Association v BAAQMD), which clarified that CEQA does not require an evaluation of impacts of the environment on a project.25 1.2.1 Criteria Air Pollutant Emissions The proposed project qualifies as a project-level project under BAAQMD’s criteria. For project-level analyses, BAAQMD has adopted screening criteria and significance criteria that would be applicable to the proposed project. If a project exceeds the screening level, it would be required to conduct a full analysis using BAAQMD’s significance criteria. 25 On March 5, 2012, the Alameda County Superior Court issued a judgment finding that the BAAQMD had failed to comply with CEQA when it adopted the thresholds of significance in the BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. The court did not determine whether the thresholds of significance were valid on their merits, but found that the adoption of the thresholds was a project under CEQA. The court issued a writ of mandate ordering the BAAQMD to set aside the thresholds and cease dissemination of them until the BAAQMD complied with CEQA. Following the court’s order, the BAAQMD released revised CEQA Air Quality Guidelines in May of 2012 that include guidance on calculating air pollution emissions, obtaining information regarding the health impacts of air pollutants, and identifying potential mitigation measures, and which set aside the significance thresholds. The Alameda County Superior Court, in ordering BAAQMD to set aside the thresholds, did not address the merits of the science or evidence supporting the thresholds, and in light of the subsequent case history discussed below, the science and reasoning contained in the BAAQMD 2011 CEQA Air Quality Guidelines provide the latest state-of-the-art guidance available. On August 13, 2013, the First District Court of Appeal ordered the trial court to reverse the judgment and upheld the BAAQMD’s CEQA Guidelines. (California Building Industry Association versus BAAQMD, Case No. A135335 and A136212 (Court of Appeal, First District, August 13, 2013).) Page 18 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Regional Significance Criteria BAAQMD’s criteria for regional significance for projects that exceed the screening thresholds are shown in Table 4. Criteria for both construction and operational phases of the project are shown. Table 4 BAAQMD Regional (Mass Emissions) Criteria Air Pollutant Significance Thresholds Pollutant Construction Phase Operational Phase Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day) Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day) Maximum Annual Emissions (Tons/year) ROG 54 54 10 NOx 54 54 10 PM10 82 (Exhaust) 82 15 PM2.5 54 (Exhaust) 54 10 PM10 and PM2.5 Fugitive Dust Best Management Practices None None Source: Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017, May. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines, Appendix D: Threshold of Significance Justification. Local CO Hotspots Congested intersections have the potential to create elevated concentrations of CO, referred to as CO hotspots. The significance criteria for CO hotspots are based on the California AAQS for CO, which is 9.0 ppm (8-hour average) and 20.0 ppm (1-hour average). However, with the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels, and implementation of control technology, the SFBAAB is in attainment of the California and National AAQS, and CO concentrations in the SFBAAB have steadily declined. Because CO concentrations have improved, BAAQMD does not require a CO hotspot analysis if the following criteria are met:  Project is consistent with an applicable congestion management program established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways, the regional transportation plan, and local congestion management agency plans.  The project would not increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more than 44,000 vehicles per hour.  The project traffic would not increase traffic volumes at affected intersection to more than 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal mixing is substantially limited (e.g. tunnel, parking garage, bridge underpass, natural or urban street canyon, below-grade roadway).26 Odors BAAQMD’s thresholds for odors are qualitative based on BAAQMD’s Regulation 7, Odorous Substances. This rule places general limitations on odorous substances and specific emission limitations on certain odorous compounds. In addition, odors are also regulated under BAAQMD Regulation 1, Rule 1-301, Public Nuisance, which states that no person shall discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air 26 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017, May. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines, Appendix D: Threshold of Significance Justification. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 19 contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or the public; or which endangers the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which causes, or has a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. Under BAAQMD’s Rule 1-301, a facility that receives three or more violation notices within a 30- day period can be declared a public nuisance. BAAQMD has established odor screening thresholds for land uses that have the potential to generate substantial odor complaints, including wastewater treatment plants, landfills or transfer stations, composting facilities, confined animal facilities, food manufacturing, and chemical plants.27 1.2.2 Toxic Air Contaminants The BAAQMD’s significance thresholds for local community risk and hazard impacts apply to the siting of a new source. Local community risk and hazard impacts are associated with TACs and PM2.5 because emissions of these pollutants can have significant health impacts at the local level. The purpose of this environmental evaluation is to identify the significant effects of the proposed project on the environment, not the significant effects of the environment on the proposed project (California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District [2015] 62 Cal.4th 369 [Case No. S213478]). CEQA does not require an environmental evaluation to analyze the environmental effects of attracting development and people to an area. However, the environmental evaluation must analyze the impacts of environmental hazards on future users when the proposed project exacerbates an existing environmental hazard or condition or if there is an exception to this exemption identified in the Public Resources Code. Schools, residential, commercial, and office uses do not use substantial quantities of TACs and typically do not exacerbate existing hazards, so these thresholds are typically applied to new industrial projects. For assessing community risk and hazards, sources within a 1,000-foot radius are considered. Sources are defined as freeways, high volume roadways (with volume of 10,000 vehicles or more per day or 1,000 trucks per day), and permitted sources.28,29 The proposed project would generate TACs and PM2.5 during construction activities that could elevate concentrations of air pollutants at the surrounding residential receptors. The BAAQMD has adopted screening tables for air toxics evaluation during construction.30 Construction-related TAC and PM2.5 impacts should be addressed on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the specific construction-related characteristics of each project and proximity to off-site receptors, as applicable.31 The project threshold identified below is applied to the proposed project’s construction phase emissions: 27 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017, May. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. 28 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017, May. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines, Appendix D: Threshold of Significance Justification. 29 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2012. Recommended Methods for Screening and Modeling Local Risks and Hazards. 30 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2010. Screening Tables for Air Toxics Evaluations during Construction. 31 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017, May. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines, Appendix D: Threshold of Significance Justification. Page 20 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Community Risk and Hazards – Project Project-level construction emissions of TACs or PM2.5 from the proposed project to individual sensitive receptors within 1,000 feet of the project site that exceed any of the thresholds listed below are considered a potentially significant community health risk:  Non-compliance with a qualified Community Risk Reduction Plan;  An excess cancer risk level of more than 10 in one million, or a non-cancer (i.e. chronic or acute) hazard index greater than 1.0 would be a significant cumulatively considerable contribution;  An incremental increase of greater than 0.3 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) annual average PM2.5 from a single source would be a significant, cumulatively considerable contribution.32 Community Risk and Hazards – Cumulative Cumulative sources represent the combined total risk values of each of the individual sources within the 1,000-foot evaluation zone. A project would have a cumulative considerable impact if the aggregate total of all past, present, and foreseeable future sources within a 1,000-foot radius from the fence line of a source or location of a receptor, plus the contribution from the project, exceeds the following:  Non-compliance with a qualified Community Risk Reduction Plan; or  An excess cancer risk levels of more than 100 in one million or a chronic non-cancer hazard index (from all local sources) greater than 10.0; or  0.8 µg/m3 annual average PM2.5.33 Current BAAQMD guidance recommends the determination of cancer risks using the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment’s (OEHHA) methodology, which was originally adopted in 2003.34,35 In February 2015, OEHHA adopted new health risk assessment guidance which includes several efforts to be more protective of children’s health. These updated procedures include the use of age sensitivity factors to account for the higher sensitivity of infants and young children to cancer causing chemicals, and age-specific breathing rates.36 However, BAAQMD has not formally adopted the new OEHHA methodology into their CEQA guidance. To be conservative, the cancer risks associated with project implementation and significance conclusions were determined using the new 2015 OEHHA guidance for risk assessments. 32 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017, May. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines, Appendix D: Threshold of Significance Justification. 33 Ibid. 34 Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2012, Recommended Methods for Screening and Modeling Local Risks and Hazards. 35 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2003. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. 36 Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 21 2. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Scientists have concluded that human activities are contributing to global climate change by adding large amounts of heat-trapping gases, known as GHG, to the atmosphere. The primary source of these GHG is fossil fuel use. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has identified four major GHG— water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and ozone (O3)—that are the likely cause of an increase in global average temperatures observed within the 20th and 21st centuries. Other GHG identified by the IPCC that contribute to global warming to a lesser extent include nitrous oxide (N2O), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and chlorofluorocarbons.37,38,39 The major GHG are briefly described below.  Carbon dioxide (CO2) enters the atmosphere through the burning of fossil fuels (oil, natural gas, and coal), solid waste, trees and wood products, and respiration, and also as a result of other chemical reactions (e.g. manufacture of cement). Carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere (sequestered) when it is absorbed by plants as part of the biological carbon cycle.  Methane (CH4) is emitted during the production and transport of coal, natural gas, and oil. Methane emissions also result from livestock and other agricultural practices and from the decay of organic waste in municipal landfills and water treatment facilities.  Nitrous oxide (N2O) is emitted during agricultural and industrial activities as well as during combustion of fossil fuels and solid waste.  Fluorinated gases are synthetic, strong GHGs that are emitted from a variety of industrial processes. Fluorinated gases are sometimes used as substitutes for ozone-depleting substances. These gases are typically emitted in smaller quantities, but because they are potent GHGs, they are sometimes referred to as high global warming potential (GWP) gases.  Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are GHGs covered under the 1987 Montreal Protocol and used for refrigeration, air conditioning, packaging, insulation, solvents, or aerosol propellants. Since they are not destroyed in the lower atmosphere (troposphere, stratosphere), CFCs drift into the upper atmosphere where, given suitable conditions, they break down ozone. These gases are also ozone-depleting gases and are therefore being replaced by other compounds that are GHGs covered under the Kyoto Protocol. • Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) contain only hydrogen, fluorine, and carbon atoms. They were introduced as alternatives to ozone-depleting substances to serve many industrial, 37 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2001. Third Assessment Report: Climate Change 2001, New York: Cambridge University Press. 38 Water vapor (H2O) is the strongest GHG and the most variable in its phases (vapor, cloud droplets, ice crystals). However, water vapor is not considered a pollutant because it is considered part of the feedback loop of changing radiative forcing rather than a primary cause of change. 39 Black carbon contributes to climate change both directly, by absorbing sunlight, and indirectly, by depositing on snow (making it melt faster) and by interacting with clouds and affecting cloud formation. Black carbon is the most strongly light-absorbing component of particulate matter (PM) emitted from burning fuels such as coal, diesel, and biomass. Reducing black carbon emissions globally can have immediate economic, climate, and public health benefits. California has been an international leader in reducing emissions of black carbon, with close to 95 percent control expected by 2020 due to existing programs that target reducing PM from diesel engines and burning activities. However, state and national GHG inventories do not include black carbon yet due to ongoing work related to resolving the precise global warming potential of black carbon. Guidance for CEQA documents does not yet include black carbon. Page 22 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data commercial, and personal needs. HFCs are emitted as by-products of industrial processes and are also used in manufacturing. They do not significantly deplete the stratospheric ozone layer, but they are strong GHGs. • Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) are a group of human-made chemicals composed of carbon and fluorine only. These chemicals (predominantly perfluoromethane [CF4] and perfluoroethane [C2F6]) were introduced, along with HFCs, as alternatives to the ozone-depleting substances. In addition, PFCs are emitted as by-products of industrial processes and are used in manufacturing. PFCs do not harm the stratospheric ozone layer, but they have a high global warming potential. • Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) is a colorless gas, soluble in alcohol and ether and slightly soluble in water. SF6 is a strong GHG used primarily in electrical transmission and distribution systems as an insulator. • Hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) contain hydrogen, fluorine, chlorine, and carbon atoms. Although ozone-depleting substances, they are less potent at destroying stratospheric ozone than CFCs. They have been introduced as temporary replacements for CFCs and are also GHGs. 40,41 GHGs are dependent on the lifetime, or persistence, of the gas molecule in the atmosphere. Some GHGs have a stronger greenhouse effect than others. These are referred to as high global warming potential (GWP) gases. Table 5 lists the GHG and their relative GWP compared to CO2. The GWP is used to convert GHGs to CO2-equivalent (CO2e) to show the relative potential that different GHGs have to retain infrared radiation in the atmosphere and contribute to the greenhouse effect. For example, under IPCC’s Second Assessment Report, GWP values for CH4 are such that a project generating 10 metric tons (MT) of CH4 would be equivalent to 210 MT of CO2. 40 United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. Overview of Greenhouse Gases. http://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/gases.html. 41 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2001. Third Assessment Report: Climate Change 2001, New York: Cambridge University Press. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 23 Table 5 GHG Emissions and their Relative Global Warming Potential Compared to CO2 GHGs Second Assessment Report Atmospheric Lifetime (Years) Fourth Assessment Report Atmospheric Lifetime (Years) Second Assessment Report Global Warming Potential Relative to CO2a Fourth Assessment Report Global Warming Potential Relative to CO2a Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 50 to 200 50 to 200 1 1 Methaneb (CH4) 12 (±3) 12 21 25 Nitrous Oxide (N2O) 120 114 310 298 Source: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1996, Second Assessment Report: Climate Change 1996, New York: Cambridge University Press; and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007, Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2001, New York: Cambridge University Press. Notes: The IPCC has published updated global warming potential (GWP) values in its Fifth Assessment Report (2013) that reflect new information on atmospheric lifetimes of GHGs and an improved calculation of the radiative forcing of CO2. However, GWP values identified in the Second Assessment Report are still used by SCAQMD to maintain consistency in GHG emissions modeling. In addition, the 2008 Scoping Plan was based on the GWP values in the Second Assessment Report. a Based on 100-year time horizon of the GWP of the air pollutant relative to CO2. b The methane GWP includes direct effects and indirect effects due to the production of tropospheric ozone and stratospheric water vapor. The indirect effect due to the production of CO2 is not included. 2.1 CALIFORNIA’S GREENHOUSE GAS SOURCES AND RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION In 2018, the statewide GHG emissions inventory was updated for 2000 to 2016 emissions using the GWPs in IPCC’s AR4.42 Based on these GWPs, California produced 429.4 MMTCO2e GHG emissions in 2016. California’s transportation sector was the single largest generator of GHG emissions, producing 40.5 percent of the state’s total emissions. Industrial sector emissions made up 23.4 percent, and electric power generation made up 16.1 percent of the state’s emissions inventory. Other major sectors of GHG emissions include commercial and residential (12.0 percent), agriculture and forestry (7.9 percent) and other (solvents and chemicals) at 0.2 percent.43 California’s GHG emissions have followed a declining trend since 2007. In 2016, emissions from routine GHG emitting activities statewide were 429 MMTCO2e, 12 MMTCO2e lower than 2015 levels or 12 MMTCO2e lower than 2015 levels. This represents an overall decrease of 13 percent since peak levels in 2004 and 2 MMTCO2e below the 1990 level and the State’s 2020 GHG target. During the 2000 to 2016 period, per capita GHG emissions in California have continued to drop from a peak in 2001 of 14.0 MTCO2e per capita to 10.8 MTCO2e per capita in 2016, a 23 percent decrease. Overall trends in the inventory also demonstrate that the carbon intensity of California’s economy (the amount of carbon pollution per million dollars of gross domestic product (GDP)) is declining, representing a 38 percent decline since the 2001 peak, while the state’s GDP has grown 41 percent during this period.44 2.2 HUMAN INFLUENCE ON CLIMATE CHANGE For approximately 1,000 years before the Industrial Revolution, the amount of GHGs in the atmosphere remained relatively constant. During the 20th century, however, scientists observed a rapid change in the 42 Methodology for determining the statewide GHG inventory is not the same as the methodology used to determine statewide GHG emissions under Assembly Bill 32 (2006). 43 California Air Resources Board, 2018, 2018 Edition California Greenhouse Gas Inventory for 2000-2016: By Category as Defined in the 2008 Scoping Plan, https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm, accessed November 20, 2018. 44 California Air Resources Board, 2018, California Greenhouse Emissions for 2000 to 2016 – Trends of Emissions and Other Indicators, https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm, accessed November 20, 2018. Page 24 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data climate and the quantity of climate change pollutants in the Earth’s atmosphere that is attributable to human activities. The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has increased by more than 35 percent since preindustrial times and has increased at an average rate of 1.4 parts per million per year since 1960, mainly due to combustion of fossil fuels and deforestation.45 These recent changes in the quantity and concentration of climate change pollutants far exceed the extremes of the ice ages, and the global mean temperature is warming at a rate that cannot be explained by natural causes alone. Human activities are directly altering the chemical composition of the atmosphere through the buildup of climate change pollutants.46 In the past, gradual changes in the earth’s temperature changed the distribution of species, availability of water, etc. However, human activities are accelerating this process so that environmental impacts associated with climate change no longer occur in a geologic time frame but within a human lifetime.47 Like the variability in the projections of the expected increase in global surface temperatures, the environmental consequences of gradual changes in the Earth’s temperature are hard to predict. Projections of climate change depend heavily upon future human activity. Therefore, climate models are based on different emission scenarios that account for historical trends in emissions and on observations of the climate record that assess the human influence of the trend and projections for extreme weather events. Climate- change scenarios are affected by varying degrees of uncertainty. For example, there are varying degrees of certainty on the magnitude of the trends for:  Warmer and fewer cold days and nights over most land areas.  Warmer and more frequent hot days and nights over most land areas.  An increase in frequency of warm spells/heat waves over most land areas.  An increase in frequency of heavy precipitation events (or proportion of total rainfall from heavy falls) over most areas.  Larger areas affected by drought.  Intense tropical cyclone activity increases.  Increased incidence of extreme high sea level (excluding tsunamis). 2.3 POTENTIAL CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS FOR CALIFORNIA Observed changes over the last several decades across the western United States reveal clear signs of climate change. Statewide average temperatures increased by about 1.7 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) from 1895 to 2011, and warming has been greatest in the Sierra Nevada. The years from 2014 through 2016 have shown unprecedented temperatures with 2014 being the warmest. By 2050, California is projected to warm by approximately 2.7°F above 2000 averages, a threefold increase in the rate of warming over the last century. By 2100, average temperatures could increase by 4.1 to 8.6°F, depending on emissions levels. In California and western North America, observations of the climate have shown: 1) a trend toward warmer winter and spring temperatures; 2) a smaller fraction of precipitation falling as snow; 3) a decrease in the amount of spring snow accumulation in the lower and middle elevation mountain zones; 4) advanced shift in 45 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007, Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007, New York: Cambridge University Press. 46 California Climate Action Team, 2006, Climate Action Team Report to Governor Schwarzenegger and the Legislature. 47 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007, Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007, New York: Cambridge University Press. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 25 the timing of snowmelt of 5 to 30 days earlier in the spring; and 5) a similar shift (5 to 30 days earlier) in the timing of spring flower blooms. Overall, California has become drier over time with 5 of the 5 years of severe to extreme drought occurring between 2007 and 2016, with unprecedented dry years occurring in 2015 and 2015. Statewide precipitation has become increasingly variable from year to year with the driest consecutive 4 years occurring from 2012 to 2015. According to the California Climate Action Team—a committee of state agency secretaries and the heads of agencies, boards, and departments, led by the Secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency—even if actions could be taken to immediately curtail climate change emissions, the potency of emissions that have already built up, their long atmospheric lifetimes (see Table 4.6-1), and the inertia of the Earth’s climate system could produce as much as 0.6 degrees Celsius (°C) (1.1°F) of additional warming. Consequently, some impacts from climate change are now considered unavoidable. Global climate change risks to California are shown in Table 4.6-2 and include impacts to public health, water resources, agriculture, coastal sea level, forest and biological resources, and energy. Specific climate change impacts that could affect the project include:  Water Resources Impacts. By late-century, all projections show drying, and half of the projections suggest 30-year average precipitation will decline by more than 10 percent below the historical average. This drying trend is caused by an apparent decline in the frequency of rain and snowfall. Even in projections with relatively small or no declines in precipitation, central and southern parts of the State can be expected to be drier from the warming effects alone as the spring snowpack will melt sooner, and the moisture contained in soils will evaporate during long dry summer months.48  Wildfire Risks. Earlier snowmelt, higher temperatures and longer dry periods over a longer fire season will directly increase wildfire risk. Indirectly, wildfire risk will also be influenced by potential climate- related changes in vegetation and ignition potential from lightning. Human activities will continue to be the biggest factor in ignition risk. The number of large fires statewide are estimated to increase from 58 percent to 128 percent above historical levels by 2085. Under the same emissions scenario, estimated burned area will increase by 57 percent to 169 percent, depending on location.49  Health Impacts. Many of the gravest threats to public health in California stem from the increase of extreme conditions, principally more frequent, more intense, and longer heat waves. Particular concern centers on the increasing tendency for multiple hot days in succession, and heat waves occurring simultaneously in several regions throughout the State. Public health could also be affected by climate change impacts on air quality, food production, the amount and quality of water supplies, energy pricing and availability, and the spread of infectious diseases. Higher temperatures also increase ground-level ozone levels. Furthermore, wildfires can increase particulate air pollution in the major air basins of California.50 48 California Climate Change Center. 2012. Our Changing Climate 2012, Vulnerability & Adaptation to the Increasing Risks from Climate Change in California. July. 49 California Council on Science and Technology, 2012, California’s Energy Future: Portraits of Energy Systems for Meeting Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets. https://ccst.us/wp-content/uploads/2012ghg.pdf, accessed November 21, 2018. 50 California Council on Science and Technology,2012, California’s Energy Future: Portraits of Energy Systems for Meeting Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets, https://ccst.us/wp-content/uploads/2012ghg.pdf, accessed November 21, 2018. Page 26 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Table 6 Summary of GHG Emissions Risks to California Impact Category Potential Risk Public Health Impacts Heat waves will be more frequent, hotter, and longer Poor air quality made worse Higher temperatures increase ground-level ozone levels Water Resources Impacts Decreasing Sierra Nevada snow pack Challenges in securing adequate water supply Potential reduction in hydropower Loss of winter recreation Agricultural Impacts Increasing temperature Increasing threats from pests and pathogens Expanded ranges of agricultural weeds Declining productivity Irregular blooms and harvests Coastal Sea Level Impacts Accelerated sea level rise Increasing coastal floods Shrinking beaches Worsened impacts on infrastructure Forest and Biological Resource Impacts Increased risk and severity of wildfires Lengthening of the wildfire season Movement of forest areas Conversion of forest to grassland Declining forest productivity Increasing threats from pest and pathogens Shifting vegetation and species distribution Altered timing of migration and mating habits Loss of sensitive or slow-moving species Energy Demand Impacts Potential reduction in hydropower Increased energy demand Sources: California Climate Change Center, 2012, Our Changing Climate 2012: Vulnerability and Adaptation to the Increasing Risks from Climate Change in California; California Energy Commission, 2006, Our Changing Climate: Assessing the Risks to California, 2006 Biennial Report, CEC-500-2006-077; California Energy Commission, 2009, The Future Is Now: An Update on Climate Change Science, Impacts, and Response Options for California. CEC-500-2008-0077; California Natural Resources Agency, 2014, Safeguarding California: Reducing Climate Risk, An Update to the 2009 California Climate Adaptation Strategy.  Increase Energy Demand. Increases in average temperature and higher frequency of extreme heat events combined with new residential development across the State will drive up the demand for cooling in the increasingly hot and longer summer season and decrease demand for heating in the cooler season. Warmer, drier summers also increase system losses at natural gas plants (reduced efficiency in the electricity generation process from higher temperatures) and hydropower plants (lower reservoir levels). Transmission of electricity will also be affected by climate change. Transmission lines lose 7 percent to 8 percent of transmitting capacity in high temperatures while needing to transport greater loads. This means that more electricity needs to be produced to make up for the loss in capacity and the growing demand.51 51 California Council on Science and Technology,2012, California’s Energy Future: Portraits of Energy Systems for Meeting Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets, https://ccst.us/wp-content/uploads/2012ghg.pdf, accessed November 21, 2018. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 27 2.1 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 2.1.1 Federal Regulations The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced on December 7, 2009, that GHG emissions threaten the public health and welfare of the American people and that GHG emissions from on-road vehicles contribute to that threat. The EPA’s final findings respond to the 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision that GHG emissions fit within the Clean Air Act definition of air pollutants. The findings do not in and of themselves impose any emission reduction requirements, but allow the EPA to finalize the GHG standards proposed in 2009 for new light-duty vehicles as part of the joint rulemaking with the Department of Transportation.52 The EPA’s endangerment finding covers emissions of six key GHGs—CO2, CH4, N2O, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and SF6—that have been the subject of scrutiny and intense analysis for decades by scientists in the United States and around the world. The first three are applicable to the proposed project because they constitute the majority of GHG emissions from the onsite land uses, and per BAAQMD guidance are the GHG emissions that should be evaluated as part of a GHG emissions inventory. 2.1.1.1 US MANDATORY REPORTING RULE FOR GREENHOUSE GASES (2009) In response to the endangerment finding, the EPA issued the Mandatory Reporting of GHG Rule that requires substantial emitters of GHG emissions (large stationary sources, etc.) to report GHG emissions data. Facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons (MT) or more of CO2 per year are required to submit an annual report. 2.1.1.2 UPDATE TO CORPORATE AVERAGE FUEL ECONOMY STANDARDS (2010/2012) The current Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards (for model years 2011 to 2016) incorporate stricter fuel economy requirements promulgated by the federal government and California into one uniform standard. Additionally, automakers are required to cut GHG emissions in new vehicles by roughly 25 percent by 2016 (resulting in a fleet average of 35.5 miles per gallon [mpg] by 2016). Rulemaking to adopt these new standards was completed in 2010. California agreed to allow automakers who show compliance with the national program to also be considered to be in compliance with State requirements. The federal government issued new standards in 2012 for model years 2017–2025, which will require a fleet average of 54.5 mpg in 2025. However, the EPA is reexamining the 2017–2025 emissions standards. 2.1.1.3 EPA REGULATION OF STATIONARY SOURCES UNDER THE CLEAN AIR ACT (ONGOING) Pursuant to its authority under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the EPA has been developing regulations for new stationary sources such as power plants, refineries, and other large sources of emissions. Pursuant to President Obama’s 2013 Climate Action Plan, the EPA was directed to also develop regulations for existing stationary sources. However, the EPA is reviewing the Clean Power Plan under President Trump’s Energy Independence Executive Order. 52 United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2009. EPA: Greenhouse Gases Threaten Public Health and the Environment, Science overwhelmingly shows greenhouse gas concentrations at unprecedented levels due to human activity, December, http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/0/08D11A451131BCA585257685005BF252. Page 28 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data 2.1.2 State Regulations Current State of California guidance and goals for reductions in GHG emissions are generally embodied in Executive Order S-03-05, Executive Order B-30-15, Assembly Bill 32, Senate Bill 32, and Senate Bill 375. 2.1.2.1 EXECUTIVE ORDER S-03-05 Executive Order S-03-05, signed June 1, 2005. Executive Order S-03-05 set the following GHG reduction targets for the State:  2000 levels by 2010  1990 levels by 2020  80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 2.1.2.2 ASSEMBLY BILL 32, THE GLOBAL WARMING SOLUTIONS ACT AB 32 was passed by the California state legislature on August 31, 2006, to place the state on a course toward reducing its contribution of GHG emissions. AB 32 follows the 2020 tier of emissions reduction targets established in Executive Order S-03-05. Under AB 32, California Air Resources Board (CARB) prepared the 2008 Climate Change Scoping Plan, the 2014 Climate Change Scoping Plan, and the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan, which are discussed below. CARB 2008 Scoping Plan The final Scoping Plan was adopted by CARB on December 11, 2008. The 2008 Scoping Plan identified that GHG emissions in California are anticipated to be 596 MMTCO2e in 2020. In December 2007, CARB approved a 2020 emissions limit of 427 MMTCO2e (471 million tons) for the state. In order to effectively implement the emissions cap, AB 32 directed CARB to establish a mandatory reporting system to track and monitor GHG emissions levels for large stationary sources that generate more than 25,000 MTCO2e per year, prepare a plan demonstrating how the 2020 deadline can be met, and develop appropriate regulations and programs to implement the plan by 2012. First Update to the Scoping Plan CARB completed a five-year update to the 2008 Scoping Plan, as required by AB 32. The First Update to the Scoping Plan, adopted at the May 22, 2014, board hearing, highlights California’s progress toward meeting the near-term 2020 GHG emission reduction goals defined in the 2008 Scoping Plan. As part of the update, CARB recalculated the 1990 GHG emission levels with the updated AR4 GWPs, and the 427 MMTCO2e 1990 emissions level and 2020 GHG emissions limit, established in response to AB 32, are slightly higher at 431 MMTCO2e.53 As identified in the Update to the Scoping Plan, California is on track to meeting the goals of AB 32. However, the update also addresses the state’s longer-term GHG goals in a post-2020 element. The post- 2020 element provides a high level view of a long-term strategy for meeting the 2050 GHG goals, including a 53 California Air Resources Board, 2014, First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan: Building on the Framework, Pursuant to AB 32, The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/ scopingplan.htm, accessed November 20, 2018. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 29 recommendation for the state to adopt a midterm target. According to the Update to the Scoping Plan, local government reduction targets should chart a reduction trajectory that is consistent with or exceeds the trajectory created by statewide goals.54 CARB identified that reducing emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels will require a fundamental shift to efficient, clean energy in every sector of the economy. Progressing toward California’s 2050 climate targets will require significant acceleration of GHG reduction rates. Emissions from 2020 to 2050 will have to decline several times faster than the rate needed to reach the 2020 emissions limit.55 2.1.2.3 EXECUTIVE ORDER B-30-15 Executive Order B-30-15, signed April 29, 2015, sets a goal of reducing GHG emissions within the state to 40 percent of 1990 levels by year 2030. Executive Order B-30-15 also directs CARB to update the Scoping Plan to quantify the 2030 GHG reduction goal for the state and requires state agencies to implement measures to meet the interim 2030 goal as well as the long-term goal for 2050 in Executive Order S-03-05. It also requires the Natural Resources Agency to conduct triennial updates of the California adaption strategy, Safeguarding California, in order to ensure climate change is accounted for in state planning and investment decisions. 2.1.2.4 SENATE BILL 32 AND ASSEMBLY BILL 197 In September 2016, Governor Brown signed Senate Bill 32 and Assembly Bill 197 into law, making the Executive Order goal for year 2030 into a statewide mandated legislative target. AB 197 established a joint legislative committee on climate change policies and requires the CARB to prioritize direction emissions reductions rather than the market-based cap-and-trade program for large stationary, mobile, and other sources. 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update Executive Order B-30-15 and SB 32 required CARB to prepare another update to the Scoping Plan to address the 2030 target for the state. On December 14, 2017, CARB adopted the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update. The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update includes the regulations and programs to achieve the 2030 target, including strategies consistent with AB 197 requirements. The 2017 Scoping Plan establishes a new emissions limit of 260 MMTCO2e for the year 2030, which corresponds to a 40 percent decrease in 1990 levels by 2030.56 California’s climate strategy will require contributions from all sectors of the economy, including enhanced focus on zero- and near-zero emission (ZE/NZE) vehicle technologies; continued investment in renewables, such as solar roofs, wind, and other types of distributed generation; greater use of low carbon fuels; integrated land conservation and development strategies; coordinated efforts to reduce emissions of short- lived climate pollutants (methane, black carbon, and fluorinated gases); and an increased focus on integrated 54 California Air Resources Board, 2014, First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan: Building on the Framework, Pursuant to AB 32, The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scopingplan.htm, accessed November 20, 2018. 55 California Air Resources Board, 2014, First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan: Building on the Framework, Pursuant to AB 32, The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/scopingplan.htm, accessed November 20, 2018. 56 California Air Resources Board. 2017, November. California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan: The Strategy for Achieving California’s 2030 Greenhouse Gas Target. https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2030sp_pp_final.pdf. Page 30 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data land use planning, to support livable, transit-connected communities and conservation of agricultural and other lands. Requirements for GHG reductions at stationary sources complement efforts by the local air districts to tighten criteria air pollutants and TACs emissions limits on a broad spectrum of industrial sources. Major elements of the 2017 Scoping Plan framework include:  Implementing and/or increasing the standards of the Mobile Source Strategy, which include increasing ZEV buses and trucks.  Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), with an increased stringency (18 percent by 2030).  Implementation of SB 350, which expands the Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) to 50 percent RPS and doubles energy efficiency savings by 2030.  California Sustainable Freight Action Plan, which improves freight system efficiency and utilizes NZE technology and deployment of ZEV trucks.  Implementing the proposed Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Strategy, which focuses on reducing methane and hydroflurocarbon emissions by 40 percent and anthropogenic black carbon emissions by 50 percent by year 2030.  Continued implementation of SB 375.  Post -2020 Cap-and-Trade Program that includes declining caps.  Development of a Natural and Working Lands Action Plan to secure California’s land base as a net carbon sink. In addition to the statewide strategies listed above, the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan also identified local governments as essential partners in achieving the state’s long-term GHG reduction goals and identified local actions to reduce GHG emissions. As part of the recommended actions, CARB recommends statewide targets of no more than 6 MTCO2e or less per capita by 2030 and 2 MTCO2e or less per capita by 2050. CARB recommends that local governments evaluate and adopt robust and quantitative locally appropriate goals that align with the statewide per capita targets and the state’s sustainable development objectives, and develop plans to achieve the local goals. The statewide per capita goals were developed by applying the percent reductions necessary to reach the 2030 and 2050 climate goals (i.e., 40 percent and 80 percent, respectively) to the state’s 1990 emissions limit established under AB 32. For CEQA projects, CARB states that lead agencies have the discretion to develop evidence-based numeric thresholds (mass emissions, per capita, or per service population) consistent with the Scoping Plan and the state’s long-term GHG goals. To the degree a project relies on GHG mitigation measures, CARB recommends that lead agencies prioritize on- site design features that reduce emissions, especially from vehicle miles traveled (VMT), and direct investments in GHG reductions in the project’s region that contribute potential air quality, health, and economic co-benefits. Where further project design or regional investments are infeasible or not proven to be effective, CARB recommends mitigating potential GHG impacts through purchasing and retiring carbon credits. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 31 The Scoping Plan scenario is set against what is called the business-as-usual yardstick—that is, what GHG emissions would look like if the state did nothing beyond the existing policies that are required and already in place to achieve the 2020 limit, as shown in Table 7, 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Emissions Reductions Gap. It includes the existing renewables requirements, advanced clean cars, the “10 percent” LCFS, and the SB 375 program for more vibrant communities, among others. However, it does not include a range of new policies or measures that have been developed or put into statute over the past two years. As shown in the table, the known commitments are expected to result in emissions that are 60 MMTCO2e above the target in 2030. If the estimated GHG reductions from the known commitments are not realized due to delays in implementation or technology deployment, the post-2020 Cap-and-Trade Program would deliver the additional GHG reductions in the sectors it covers to ensure the 2030 target is achieved. Table 7 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Emissions Reductions Gap Modeling Scenario 2030 GHG Emissions MMTCO2e Reference Scenario (Business-as-Usual) 389 With Known Commitments 320 2030 GHG Target 260 Gap to 2030 Target with Known Commitments 60 Source: California Air Resources Board. 2017, November. California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan: The Strategy for Achieving California’s 2030 Greenhouse Gas Target. https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2030sp_pp_final.pdf. Table 8, 2017 Scoping Plan Emissions Changes by Sector to Achieve the 2030 Target, provides estimated GHG emissions by sector compared to 1990 levels, and the range of GHG emissions for each sector estimated for 2030. Table 8 2017 Scoping Plan Emissions Changes by Sector to Achieve the 2030 Target Scoping Plan Sector 1990 MMTCO2e 2030 Proposed Plan Ranges MMTCO2e % Change from 1990 Agricultural 26 24-25 -8% to -4% Residential and Commercial 44 38-40 -14% to -9% Electric Power 108 30-53 -72% to -51% High GWP 3 8-11 267% to 367% Industrial 98 83-90 -15% to -8% Recycling and Waste 7 8-9 14% to 29% Transportation (including TCU) 152 103-111 -32% to -27% Net Sinka -7 TBD TBD Sub Total 431 294-339 -32% to -21% Cap-and-Trade Program NA 24-79 NA Total 431 260 -40% Source: California Air Resources Board. 2017, November. California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan: The Strategy for Achieving California’s 2030 Greenhouse Gas Target. https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2030sp_pp_final.pdf. Notes: TCU = Transportation, Communications, and Utilities; TBD: To Be Determined. a Work is underway through 2017 to estimate the range of potential sequestration benefits from the natural and working lands sector. Page 32 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data 2.1.2.5 SENATE BILL 375 – SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY SB 375, the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act, was adopted in 2005 to connect the Scoping Plan’s GHG emissions reductions targets for the transportation sector to local land use decisions that affect travel behavior. Its intent is to reduce GHG emissions from light-duty trucks and automobiles (excludes emissions associated with goods movement) by aligning regional long-range transportation plans, investments, and housing allocations to local land use planning to reduce VMT and vehicle trips. Specifically, SB 375 required CARB to establish GHG emissions reduction targets for each of the 18 regions in California managed by a metropolitan planning organization (MPO). The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is the MPO for the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area region. MTC’s targets are a 7 percent per capita reduction in GHG emissions from 2005 by 2020, and 15 percent per capita reduction from 2005 levels by 2035.57 2017 Update to the SB 375 Targets SB 375 requires CARB to periodically update the targets, no later than every 8 years. In June 2017, CARB released updated targets and technical methodology and recently released another update in February 2018. The updated targets consider the need to further reduce VMT, as identified in the draft 2017 Scoping Plan Update, while balancing the need for additional and more flexible revenue sources to incentivize positive planning and action toward sustainable communities. Like the 2010 targets, the updated SB 375 targets are in units of percent per capita reduction in GHG emissions from automobiles and light trucks relative to 2005. This excludes reductions anticipated from implementation of state technology and fuels strategies and any potential future state strategies such as statewide road user pricing. The proposed targets call for greater per capita GHG emission reductions from SB 375 than are currently in place, which for 2035, translate into proposed targets that either match or exceed the emission reduction levels in the MPOs’ currently adopted SCSs. As proposed, CARB staff’s proposed targets would result in an additional reduction of over 10 MMTCO2e in 2035 compared to the current targets. For the next round of SCS updates, CARB’s updated targets for the MTC/ABAG region are a 10 percent per capita GHG reduction in 2020 from 2005 levels (compared to 7 percent under the 2010 target) and a 19 percent per capita GHG reduction in 2035 from 2005 levels (compared to the 2010 target of 15 percent).58 The updated targets and methodology will take effect on January 1, 2018, and SCS adopted in 2018 and later would be subject to these new targets. Plan Bay Area, Strategy for a Sustainable Region Plan Bay Area 2040 is the Bay Area’s RTP/SCS and was adopted jointly by ABAG and MTC on July 26, 2017. It lays out a development scenario for the region, which, when integrated with the transportation network and other transportation measures and policies, would reduce GHG emissions from transportation (excluding goods movement) beyond the per capita reduction targets identified by CARB. Plan Bay Area 2040 is a limited and focused update to the 2013 Plan Bay Area, with updated planning assumptions that incorporate key economic, demographic, and financial trends from the last several years. 57 California Air Resources Board. 2010. Staff Report, Proposed Regional Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Targets for Automobiles and Light Trucks Pursuant to Senate Bill 375, August. 58 California Air Resources Board. 2018, February. Proposed Update to the SB 375 Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Targets. https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/sb375/sb375_target_update_final_staff_report_feb2018.pdf. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 33 As part of the implementing framework for Plan Bay Area, local governments have identified Priority Development Areas (PDAs) to focus growth. PDAs are transit-oriented, infill development opportunity areas in existing communities. Overall, well over two-thirds of all regional growth in the Bay Area by 2040 is allocated in PDAs. Per the Final Plan Bay Area 2040, while the projected number of new housing units and new jobs within PDAs would increase to 629,000 units and 707,000 jobs compared to the adopted Plan Bay Area 2013, its overall share would be reduced to 77 percent and 55 percent.59 However, Plan Bay Area 2040 remains on track to meet a 16 percent per capita reduction of GHG emissions by 2035 and a 10 percent per capita reduction by 2020 from 2005 conditions.60 The proposed project site is not within a PPA.61 2.1.2.6 OTHER APPLICABLE MEASURES Transportation Assembly Bill 1493 California vehicle GHG emission standards were enacted under AB 1493 (Pavley I). Pavley I is a clean-car standard that reduces GHG emissions from new passenger vehicles (light-duty auto to medium-duty vehicles) from 2009 through 2016 and is anticipated to reduce GHG emissions from new passenger vehicles by 30 percent in 2016. California implements the Pavley I standards through a waiver granted to California by the EPA. In 2012, the EPA issued a Final Rulemaking that sets even more stringent fuel economy and GHG emissions standards for model year 2017 through 2025 light-duty vehicles.62 In January 2012, CARB approved the Advanced Clean Cars program (formerly known as Pavley II) for model years 2017 through 2025. The program combines the control of smog, soot, and global warming gases and requirements for greater numbers of zero-emission vehicles into a single package of standards. Under California’s Advanced Clean Car program, by 2025, new automobiles will emit 34 percent fewer global warming gases and 75 percent fewer smog-forming emissions.63 Executive Order S-1-07 On January 18, 2007, the State set a new Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) for transportation fuels sold in California. Executive Order S-1-07 sets a declining standard for GHG emissions measured in carbon dioxide equivalent gram per unit of fuel energy sold in California. The LCFS requires a reduction of 2.5 percent in the carbon intensity of California’s transportation fuels by 2015 and a reduction of at least 10 percent by 2020. The LCFS applies to refiners, blenders, producers, and importers of transportation fuels and would use 59 Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 2017, March. Plan Bay Area 2040 Plan. 60 Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 2017, March. Plan Bay Area 2040 Plan. 61 Associated Bay Area Governments (ABAG). July 2015. Priority Development Area Showcase, http://gis.abag.ca.gov/website/PDAShowcase/. 62 See also the discussion on the update to the CAFE standards under federal laws, above. In January 2012, CARB approved the Advanced Clean Cars program (formerly known as Pavley II) for model years 2017 through 2025. The program combines the control of smog, soot and global warming gases and requirements for greater numbers of zero-emission vehicles into a single package of standards. Under California’s Advanced Clean Car program, by 2025, new automobiles will emit 34 percent fewer global warming gases and 75 percent fewer smog-forming emissions. 63 See also the discussion on the update to the CAFE standards under Federal Laws, above. In January 2012, CARB approved the Advanced Clean Cars program (formerly known as Pavley II) for model years 2017 through 2025. The program combines the control of smog, soot and global warming gases and requirements for greater numbers of zero-emission vehicles into a single package of standards. Under California’s Advanced Clean Car program, by 2025, new automobiles will emit 34 percent fewer global warming gases and 75 percent fewer smog-forming emissions. Page 34 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data market-based mechanisms to allow these providers to choose how they reduce emissions during the “fuel cycle,” using the most economically feasible methods. Executive Order B-16-2012 On March 23, 2012, the State identified that CARB, the California Energy Commission (CEC), the Public Utilities Commission, and other relevant agencies worked with the Plug-in Electric Vehicle Collaborative and the California Fuel Cell Partnership to establish benchmarks to accommodate zero-emissions vehicles in major metropolitan areas, including infrastructure to support them (e.g. electric vehicle charging stations). The executive order also directs the number of zero-emission vehicles in California’s State vehicle fleet to increase through the normal course of fleet replacement so that at least 10 percent of fleet purchases of light-duty vehicles are zero-emission by 2015 and at least 25 percent by 2020. The executive order also establishes a target for the transportation sector of reducing GHG emissions from the transportation sector 80 percent below 1990 levels. Renewables Portfolio Standard Senate Bills 1078, 107, X1-2, and Executive Order S-14-08 A major component of California’s Renewable Energy Program is the renewable portfolio standard (RPS) established under Senate Bills 1078 (Sher) and 107 (Simitian). Under the RPS, certain retail sellers of electricity were required to increase the amount of renewable energy each year by at least 1 percent in order to reach at least 20 percent by December 30, 2010. Executive Order S-14-08 was signed in November 2008, which expanded the State’s Renewable Energy Standard to 33 percent renewable power by 2020. This standard was adopted by the legislature in 2011 (SBX1-2). The increase in renewable sources for electricity production will decrease indirect GHG emissions from development projects because electricity production from renewable sources is generally considered carbon neutral. Senate Bill 350 Senate Bill 350 (de Leon), was signed into law September 2015. SB 350 establishes tiered increases to the RPS of 40 percent by 2024, 45 percent by 2027, and 50 percent by 2030. SB 350 also set a new goal to double the energy efficiency savings in electricity and natural gas through energy efficiency and conservation measures. Executive Order B-55-18 and SB 100 SB 100 and Executive Order B-55-18 were signed by Governor Brown on September 10, 2018. Under the existing RPS, 25 percent of retail sales are required to be from renewable sources by December 31, 2016, 33 percent by December 31, 2020, 40 percent by December 31, 2024, 45 percent by December 31, 2027, and 50 percent by December 31, 2030. SB 100 raises California’s RPS requirement to 50 percent renewable resources target by December 31, 2026, and to achieve a 60 percent target by December 31, 2030. SB 100 also requires that retail sellers and local publicly owned electric utilities procure a minimum quantity of electricity products from eligible renewable energy resources so that the total kilowatt hours of those products sold to their retail end-use customers achieve 44 percent of retail sales by December 31, 2024, 52 percent by December 31, 2027, and 60 percent by December 31, 2030. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 35 In addition to targets under AB 32 and SB32, Executive Order B-55-18 establishes a carbon neutrality goal for the state of California by 2045; and sets a goal to maintain net negative emissions thereafter. The Executive Order directs the California Natural Resources Agency, CalEPA, the Department of Food and Agriculture, and CARB to include sequestration targets in the Natural and Working Lands Climate Change Implementation Plan consistent with the carbon neutrality goal. Energy Efficiency California Building Standards Code – Building Energy Efficiency Standards Energy conservation standards for new residential and nonresidential buildings were adopted by the California Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (now the CEC) in June 1977 and most recently revised in 2013 (Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Title 24 requires the design of building shells and building components to conserve energy. The standards are updated periodically to allow for consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficiency technologies and methods. On May 31, 2012, the CEC adopted the 2013 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, which went into effect on July 1, 2014. Buildings that are constructed in accordance with the 2013 Building Energy Efficiency Standards are 25 percent (residential) to 30 percent (nonresidential) more energy efficient than the 2008 standards as a result of better windows, insulation, lighting, ventilation systems, and other features that reduce energy consumption in homes and businesses. Most recently, the CEC adopted the 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. The 2016 Standards will continue to improve upon the current 2013 Standards for new construction of, and additions and alterations to, residential and nonresidential buildings. These standards went into effect on January 1, 2017. Under the 2016 Standards, residential buildings are 28 percent more energy efficient than the 2013 Standards while non- residential buildings are 5 percent more energy efficient than the 2013 Standards.64 The 2016 standards will not get us to zero net energy (ZNE). However, they do get us very close to the State’s goal and make important steps toward changing residential building practices in California.65 The 2019 standards move towards cutting energy use in new homes by more than 50 percent and will require installation of solar photovoltaic systems for single-family homes and multi-family buildings of 3 stories and less. Four key areas the 2019 standards will focus on include 1) smart residential photovoltaic systems; 2) updated thermal envelope standards (preventing heat transfer from the interior to exterior and vice versa); 3) residential and nonresidential ventilation requirements; 4) and nonresidential lighting requirements.66 Under the 2019 standards, nonresidential buildings will be 30 percent more energy efficient compared to the 2016 standards while single-family homes will be 7 percent more energy efficient. When accounting for the 64 California Energy Commission (CEC). 2015, June 10. 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, Adoption Hearing Presentation. http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2016standards/rulemaking/documents. 65 California Energy Commission (CEC). 2015. 2016 Building Energy Efficiency Standards Frequently Asked Questions. http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2016standards/rulemaking/documents/2016_Building_Energy_Efficiency_Standards_FAQ.pdf. 66 California Energy Commission (CEC). 2018. News Release: Energy Commission Adopts Standards Requiring Solar Systems for New Homes, First in Nation. http://www.energy.ca.gov/releases/2018_releases/2018-05-09_building_standards_adopted_nr.html. Page 36 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data electricity generated by the solar photovoltaic system, single-family homes would use 53 percent less energy compared to homes built to the 2016 standards.67 California Green Building Standards Code – CALGreen On July 17, 2008, the California Building Standards Commission adopted the nation’s first green building standards. The California Green Building Standards Code (Part 11, Title 24, known as “CALGreen”) was adopted as part of the California Building Standards Code (Title 24, CCR). CALGreen established planning and design standards for sustainable site development, energy efficiency (in excess of the California Energy Code requirements), water conservation, material conservation, and internal air contaminants.68 The mandatory provisions of the California Green Building Code Standards became effective January 1, 2011, was last updated in 2016. The CEC adopted the 2019 CALGreen on May 9, 2018. The 2019 CALGreen standards become effective January 1, 2020. 2006 Appliance Energy Efficiency Regulations The 2006 Appliance Efficiency Regulations (Title 20, CCR Sections 1601 through 1608) were adopted by the California Energy Commission on October 11, 2006, and approved by the California Office of Administrative Law on December 14, 2006. The regulations include standards for both federally regulated appliances and non–federally regulated appliances. Though these regulations are now often viewed as “business-as-usual,” they exceed the standards imposed by all other states, and they reduce GHG emissions by reducing energy demand. Solid Waste AB 939 California’s Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939, Public Resources Code 40050 et seq.) set a requirement for cities and counties throughout the State to divert 50 percent of all solid waste from landfills by January 1, 2000, through source reduction, recycling, and composting. In 2008, the requirements were modified to reflect a per capita requirement rather than tonnage. To help achieve this, the act requires that each city and county prepare and submit a source reduction and recycling element. AB 939 also established the goal for all California counties to provide at least 15 years of ongoing landfill capacity. AB 341 (Chapter 476, Statutes of 2011) increased the statewide goal for waste diversion to 75 percent by 2020 and requires recycling of waste from commercial and multifamily residential land uses. AB 1327 The California Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Access Act (AB 1327, California Public Resources Code Sections 42900 et seq.) requires areas to be set aside for collecting and loading recyclable materials in development projects. The act required the California Integrated Waste Management Board to develop a model ordinance for adoption by any local agency requiring adequate areas for collection and loading of recyclable materials as part of development projects. Local agencies are required to adopt the model or an ordinance of their own. Section 5.408 of the 2016 California Green Building Standards Code (Title 24, 67 California Energy Commission (CEC). 2018. 2019 Building Energy and Efficiency Standards Frequently Asked Questions. http://www.energy.ca.gov/title24/2019standards/documents/2018_Title_24_2019_Building_Standards_FAQ.pdf. 68 The green building standards became mandatory in the 2010 edition of the code. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 37 California Code of Regulations, Part 11) also requires that at least 65 percent of the nonhazardous construction and demolition waste from nonresidential construction operations be recycled and/or salvaged for reuse. AB 1826 AB 1826, signed on October of 2014, requires businesses to recycle their organic waste on and after April 1, 2016, depending on the amount of waste they generate per week. This law also requires that on and after January 1, 2016, local jurisdictions implement an organic waste recycling program to divert organic waste generated by businesses, including multifamily residential dwellings that consist of five or more units. Organic waste means food waste, green waste, landscape and pruning waste, nonhazardous wood waste, and food- soiled paper waste that is mixed in with food waste. Water Efficiency SBX7-7 The 20x2020 Water Conservation Plan was issued by the Department of Water Resources (DWR) in 2010 pursuant to Senate Bill 7, which was adopted during the 7th Extraordinary Session of 2009–2010 and therefore dubbed “SBX7-7.” SBX7-7 mandated urban water conservation and authorized the DWR to prepare a plan implementing urban water conservation requirements (20x2020 Water Conservation Plan). In addition, it required agricultural water providers to prepare agricultural water management plans, measure water deliveries to customers, and implement other efficiency measures. SBX7-7 requires urban water providers to adopt a water conservation target of 20 percent reduction in urban per capita water use by 2020 compared to 2005 baseline use. AB 1881 The Water Conservation in Landscaping Act of 2006 (AB 1881) requires local agencies to adopt the updated DWR model ordinance or equivalent. AB 1881 also requires the Energy Commission, in consultation with the department, to adopt, by regulation, performance standards and labeling requirements for landscape irrigation equipment, including irrigation controllers, moisture sensors, emission devices, and valves to reduce the wasteful, uneconomic, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy or water. Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Strategy Senate Bill 1383 On September 19, 2016, the Governor signed SB 1383 to supplement the GHG reduction strategies in the Scoping Plan to consider short-lived climate pollutants, including black carbon and CH4. Black carbon is the light-absorbing component of fine particulate matter (PM) produced during incomplete combustion of fuels. SB 1383 requires the state board, no later than January 1, 2018, to approve and begin implementing that comprehensive strategy to reduce emissions of short-lived climate pollutants to achieve a reduction in methane by 40 percent, hydrofluorocarbon gases by 40 percent, and anthropogenic black carbon by 50 percent below 2013 levels by 2030, as specified. The bill also establishes targets for reducing organic waste in landfill. In April 2016, CARB adopted the Proposed Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Strategy, which identifies the state’s approach to reducing anthropogenic and biogenic sources of short-lived climate pollutants. Page 38 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Anthropogenic sources of black carbon include on- and off-road transportation, residential wood burning, fuel combustion (charbroiling), and industrial processes. According to CARB, ambient levels of black carbon in California are 90 percent lower than in the early 1960s, despite the tripling of diesel fuel use.69 In-use on- road rules are expected to reduce black carbon emissions from on-road sources by 80 percent between 2000 and 2020. 2.1.3 Local Regulations 2.1.3.1 CITY OF CUPERTINO CLIMATE ACTION PLAN The City of Cupertino published the public draft Climate Action Plan (CAP) in December, 2014 to achieve the GHG reduction target of AB 32 for target year 2020. The CAP serves to support California’s statewide climate change efforts through identification of actions that can be taken locally, by residents, businesses, and the City itself, to ensure the State’s ambitious reduction goals can be achieved. The strategies outlined in the CAP seek to not only reduce GHG emissions, but also provide energy, water, fuel, and cost savings for the City.70 The goals established by the City’s CAP are the following:  Goal 1 – Reduce Energy Use: Increase energy efficiency in existing homes and buildings and increase use of renewable energy community-wide.  Goal 2 – Encourage Alternative Transportation: Support transit, carpooling, walking, and bicycling as viable transportation modes to decrease the number of single-occupancy vehicle trips within the community.  Goal 3 – Conserve Water: Promote the efficient use and conservation of water in buildings and landscapes.  Goal 4 – Reduce Solid Waste: Strengthen waste reduction efforts through recycling and organics collection and reduced consumption of materials that otherwise end up in landfills.  Goal 5 – Expand Green Infrastructure: Enhance the City’s existing urban forest on public and private lands. 2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 2.2.1 Existing Emissions The project site is currently developed with an 8,323 square foot Good Year Auto Service Center building. The current site uses generate criteria air pollutants emissions from energy use, transportation, and area sources associated with the operation of the Auto Service Center. 69 California Air Resources Board. 2017, March. Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Strategy. https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/shortlived/meetings/03142017/final_slcp_report.pdf. 70 City of Cupertino, 2015. Climate Action Plan. January, 2015. http://www.cupertino.org/home/showdocument?id=13531 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 39 2.3 METHODOLOGY The BAAQMD CEQA Air Quality Guidelines were prepared to assist in the evaluation of air quality impacts of projects and plans proposed within the Bay Area. The guidelines provide recommended procedures for evaluating potential GHG emissions impacts during the environmental review process, consistent with CEQA requirements, and include recommended thresholds of significance, mitigation measures, and background information. 2.3.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions BAAQMD has a tiered approach for assessing GHG emissions impacts of a project. If a project is within the jurisdiction of an agency that has a “qualified” GHG reduction strategy, the project can assess consistency of its GHG emissions impacts with the reduction strategy. BAAQMD has adopted screening criteria and significance criteria for development projects that would be applicable for the proposed project. If a project exceeds the Guidelines’ GHG screening-level sizes, the project would be required to conduct a full GHG analysis using the following BAAQMD significance criteria:  1,100 MT of CO2e per year; or  4.6 MT of CO2e per service population (SP) for year 2020 AB 32 requires the statewide GHG emission be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020. On a per-capita basis, that means reducing the annual emissions of 14 tons of carbon dioxide for every man, woman, and child in California down to about 10 tons per person by 2020.71 Hence, BAAQMD’s per capita significance threshold is calculated based on the State’s land use sector emissions inventory prepared by CARB and the demographic forecasts for the 2008 Scoping Plan. The land use sector GHG emissions for 1990 were estimated by BAAQMD, as identified in Appendix D of the BAAQMD CEQA Guidelines, to be 295.53 MMTCO2eand the 2020 California service population (SP) to be 64.3 million. Therefore, the significance threshold that would ensure consistency with the GHG reduction goals of AB 32 is estimated at 4.6 MTCO2e/SP for year 2020.72 Land use development projects include residential, commercial, industrial, and public land use facilities. Direct sources of emissions may include on-site combustion of energy, such as natural gas used for heating and cooking, emissions from industrial processes (not applicable for most land use development projects), and fuel combustion from mobile sources. Indirect emissions are emissions produced off-site from energy production, water conveyance due to a project’s energy use and water consumption, and non-biogenic emissions from waste disposal. Biogenic CO2 emissions are not included in the quantification of a project’s GHG emissions, because biogenic CO2 is derived from living biomass (e.g. organic matter present in wood, paper, vegetable oils, animal fat, food, animal, and yard waste) as opposed to fossil fuels. Although GHG emissions from waste generation are included in the GHG inventory for the proposed project, the efficiency threshold of 4.6 MTCO2e per service population for 2020 identified above does not include the waste sector, and it is therefore not considered in the evaluation. 71 California Air Resources Board, 2008. Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change. 72 Bay Area Air Quality Management District, 2017, May, California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. Page 40 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data BAAQMD does not have thresholds of significance for construction-related GHG emissions, but requires quantification and disclosure of construction-related GHG emissions.73 For operational phases, if projects exceed the bright line and per capita efficiency targets, GHG emissions would be considered potentially significant in the absence of mitigation measures. 73 Ibid. ........................................................................................................................ APPENDIX B: HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................................ Health Risk Assessment Background and Modeling Data Health Risk Assessment Background and Modeling Data 1. Health Risk Assessment 1.1 CONSTRUCTION HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT The proposed project would construct a boutique hotel on a 1.29-acre site in the City of Cupertino. The project site is located at 10931 North De Anza Boulevard in the northern region of the City. The following provides the background methodology used for the construction health risk assessment for the proposed project. The latest version of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Guidelines requires projects to evaluate the impacts of construction activities on sensitive receptors (BAAQMD, 2017). Project construction is anticipated to take place starting at the beginning of August 2020 and be completed by the end of March 2022 (approximately 592 work days). The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site include the residents at the Aviare Apartments approximately 140 feet to the east of the project across North De Anza Boulevard. The BAAQMD has developed Screening Tables for Air Toxics Evaluation During Construction (2017) that evaluate construction-related health risks associated with residential, commercial, and industrial projects. According to the screening tables, the residences are closer than the distance of 100 meters (328 feet) that would screen out potential health risks and therefore could be potentially impacted from the proposed construction activities. As a result, a site-specific construction health risk assessment (HRA) has been prepared for the proposed project. This HRA considers the health impact to off-site sensitive receptors (children at the nearby residences) from construction emissions at the project site, including diesel equipment exhaust (diesel particulate matter or DPM) and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5). It should be noted that these health impacts are based on conservative (i.e., health protective) assumptions. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA, 2005) and the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2015) note that conservative assumptions used in a risk assessment are intended to ensure that the estimated risks do not underestimate the actual risks. Therefore, the estimated risks may not necessarily represent actual risks experienced by populations at or near a site. The use of conservative assumptions tends to produce upper-bound estimates of exposure and thus risk. For residential-based receptors, the following conservative assumptions were used:  It was assumed that maximum-exposed off-site residential receptors (both children and adults) stood outdoors and are subject to DPM at their residence for 8 hours per day, and approximately 260 construction days per year. In reality, California residents typically will spend on average 2 hours per day outdoors at their residences (USEPA, 2011). This would result in lower exposures to construction related DPM emissions and lower estimated risk values. Page 2 Health Risk Assessment Background and Modeling Data  The calculated risk for infants from third trimester to age 2 is multiplied by a factor of 10 to account for early life exposure and uncertainty in child versus adult exposure impacts (OEHHA, 2015). 1.2 METHODOLOGY AND SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS For this HRA, the BAAQMD significance thresholds were deemed to be appropriate and the thresholds that were used for this project are shown below:  Excess cancer risk of more than 10 in a million  Non-cancer hazard index (chronic or acute) greater than 1.0  Incremental increase in average annual PM2.5 concentration of greater than 0.3 μg/m3 The methodology used in this HRA is consistent with the following BAAQMD and the OEHHA guidance documents:  BAAQMD, 2017. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. May 2017.  BAAQMD, 2010. Screening Tables for Air Toxics Evaluation During Construction. May 2010.  BAAQMD, 2012. Recommended Methods for Screening and Modeling Local Risks and Hazards. Version 3.0. May 2012.  OEHHA. 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for the Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. February, 2015. Potential exposures to DPM and PM2.5 from proposed project construction were evaluated for off-site sensitive receptors in close proximity to the site. Pollutant concentrations were estimated using an air dispersion model, and excess lifetime cancer risks and chronic non-cancer hazard indexes were calculated. These risks were then compared to the significance thresholds adopted for this HRA. 1.3 CONSTRUCTION EMISSIONS Construction emissions were calculated as average daily emissions in pounds per day, using the proposed construction schedule and the latest version of California Emissions Estimation Model, known as CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2 (CAPCOA, 2016). DPM emissions were based on the CalEEMod construction runs, using annual exhaust PM10 construction emissions presented in pounds (lbs) per day. The PM2.5 emissions were taken from the CalEEMod output for exhaust PM2.5 also presented in lbs per day. The project was assumed to take place over 20 months (425 work days) from beginning of August 2020 to March 2022. The average daily emission rates from constr uction equipment used during the proposed project were determined by dividing the annual average emissions for each construction year by the number of construction days per year for each calendar year of construction (i.e., 2020 through 2022). The off-site hauling emission rates were adjusted to evaluate localized emissions from the 0.31-mile haul route within 1,000 feet of the project site. The CalEEMod construction emissions output and emission rate calculations are provided in Appendix A of the HRA. Health Risk Assessment Background and Modeling Data Page 3 1.4 DISPERSION MODELING To assess the impact of emitted compounds on sensitive receptors near the project, air quality modeling using the AERMOD atmospheric dispersion model was performed. The model is a steady state Gaussian plume model and is an approved model by BAAQMD for estimating ground level impacts from point and fugitive sources in simple and complex terrain. The on-site construction emissions for the project were modeled as poly-area sources. The off-site mobile sources were modeled as adjacent line volume sources. The model requires additional input parameters, including chemical emission data and local meteorology. Inputs for the construction emission rates are those described in Section 1.3. Meteorological data obtained from the BAAQMD for the nearest representative meteorological station (N.Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport) with the five latest available years (2009 to 2013) of record were used to represent local weather conditions and prevailing winds. The modeling analysis also considered the spatial distribution and elevation of each emitting source in relation to the sensitive receptors. To accommodate the model’s Cartesian grid format, direction-dependent calculations were obtained by identifying the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates for each source location. In addition, digital elevation model (DEM) data for the area were obtained and included in the model runs to account for complex terrain. An emission release height of 4.15 meters was used as representative of the stack exhaust height for off-road construction equipment and diesel truck traffic, and an initial vertical dispersion parameter of 1.93 m was used, per California Air Resources Board (CARB) guidance (2000). To determine contaminant impacts during construction hours, the model’s Season-Hour-Day (HRDOW) scalar option was invoked to predict flagpole-level concentrations (1.5 m for ground-floor receptors, 6.1 m for second-floor receptors, and 9.1 m for third-floor receptors) for construction emissions generated between the hours of 7:00 AM and 4:00 PM with a 1-hour lunch break. In addition, a scalar factor was applied to the risk calculations to account for the number of days residents are exposed to constr uction emissions per year. For all modeling runs, a unit emission rate of 1 gram per second was used. The unit emission rates were proportioned over the poly-area sources for on-site construction emissions, and divided between the volume sources for off-site hauling emissions. The maximum modeled concentrations from the output files were then multiplied by the emission rates calculated in Appendix A to obtain the maximum flagpole-level concentrations at the off-site maximum exposed receptors (MER). The off-site MER are the Aviare Apartments approximately 140 feet to the east across North De Anza Boulevard. The MER location is the receptor location associated with the maximum predicted AERMOD concentrations from the on-site emission source. The calculated on-site emission rates are approximately 2 to 3 orders of magnitude higher than the calculated off-site emission rates (see Appendix A). Therefore, the maximum concentrations associated with the on-site emission sources produce the highest overall ground-level MER concentrations and, consequently, higher calculated health risks. The air dispersion model output for the emission sources is presented in Appendix B. The model output DPM and PM2.5 concentrations from the construction emission sources are provided in Appendix C. Page 4 Health Risk Assessment Background and Modeling Data 1.5 RISK CHARACTERIZATION 1.5.1 Carcinogenic Chemical Risk A threshold of ten in a million (10x10-6) has been established as a level posing no significant risk for exposures to carcinogens. Health risks associated with exposure to carcinogenic compounds can be defined in terms of the probability of developing cancer as a result of exposure to a chemical at a given concentration. The cancer risk probability is determined by multiplying the chemical’s annual concentration by its cancer potency factor (CPF), a measure of the carcinogenic potential of a chemical when a dose is received through the inhalation pathway. It is an upper-limit estimate of the probability of contracting cancer as a result of continuous exposure to an ambient concentration of one microgram per cubic meter (µg/m3) over a lifetime of 70 years. Recent guidance from OEHHA recommends a refinement to the standard point estimate approach with the use of age-specific breathing rates and age sensitivity factors (ASFs) to assess risk for susceptible subpopulations such as children. For the inhalation pathway, the procedure requires the incorporation of several discrete variates to effectively quantify dose for each age group. Once determined, contaminant dose is multiplied by the cancer potency factor in units of inverse dose expressed in milligrams per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day)-1 to derive the cancer risk estimate. Therefore, to accommodate the unique exposures associated with the residential receptors, the following dose algorithm was used. Dose୅୍ୖ,୮ୣ୰ ୟ୥ୣ ୥୰୭୳୮ ൌ ሺCୟ୧୰ ൈ EF ൈ ሾ BR BWሿ ൈ A ൈ CFሻ Where: DoseAIR = dose by inhalation (mg/kg-day), per age group Cair = concentration of contaminant in air (µg/m3) EF = exposure frequency (number of days/365 days) BR/BW = daily breathing rate normalized to body weight (L/kg-day) A = inhalation absorption factor (default = 1) CF = conversion factor (1x10-6, µg to mg, L to m3) The inhalation absorption factor (A) is a unitless factor that is only used if the cancer potency factor included a correction for absorption across the lung. For this assessment, the default value of 1 was used. For residential receptors, the exposure frequency (EF) of 0.96 is used to represent 350 days per year to allow for a two week period away from home each year (OEHHA, 2015). The 95th percentile daily breathing rates (BR/BW), exposure duration (ED), age sensitivity factors (ASFs), and fraction of time at home (FAH) for the various age groups are provided herein: Age Groups BR/BW (L/kg-day) ED ASF FAH Third trimester 361 0.25 10 0.85 0-2 age group 1,090 2 10 0.85 2-9 age group 861 7 3 0.72 2-16 age group 745 14 3 0.72 Health Risk Assessment Background and Modeling Data Page 5 16-30 age group 335 14 1 0.73 16-70 age group 290 54 1 0.73 For construction analysis, the exposure duration spans the length of construction (e.g. 425 work days). As the length of construction is equal to 2 years, only the third trimester and 0-2 age bins apply to the construction analysis for the off-site residential receptors. To calculate the overall cancer risk, the risk for each appropriate age group is calculated per the following equation: Cancer Risk ୅୍ୖ ൌ Dose୅୍ୖ ൈ CPF ൈ ASF ൈ FAH ൈ ED ܣܶ Where: DoseAIR = dose by inhalation (mg/kg-day), per age group CPF = cancer potency factor, chemical-specific (mg/kg-day)-1 ASF = age sensitivity factor, per age group FAH = fraction of time at home, per age group (for residential receptors only) ED = exposure duration (years) AT = averaging time period over which exposure duration is averaged (70 years) The CPFs used in the assessment were obtained from OEHHA guidance. The excess lifetime cancer risks during the construction period to the maximally exposed resident were calculated based on the factors provided above. The cancer risks for each age group are summed to estimate the total cancer risk for each toxic chemical species. For purposes of this assessment and as stated, the calculated residential cancer risks associated with construction activities are based on the 3rd trimester and 0-2 year old age groups. The final step converts the cancer risk in scientific notation to a whole number that expresses the cancer risk in “chances per million” by multiplying the cancer risk by a factor of 1x106 (i.e. 1 million). The calculated results are provided in Appendix C. 1.5.2 Non-Carcinogenic Hazards An evaluation of the potential non-cancer effects of chronic chemical exposures was also conducted. Adverse health effects are evaluated by comparing the annual receptor level (flagpole) concentration of each chemical compound with the appropriate reference exposure limit (REL). Available RELs promulgated by OEHHA were considered in the assessment. The hazard index approach was used to quantify non-carcinogenic impacts. The hazard index assumes that chronic sub-threshold exposures adversely affect a specific organ or organ system (toxicological endpoint). For each discrete chemical exposure, target organs presented in regulatory guidance were used. To calculate the hazard index, each chemical concentration or dose is divided by the appropriate toxicity value. This ratio is summed for compounds affecting the same toxicological endpoint. A health hazard is presumed to exist where the total equals or exceeds one. Page 6 Health Risk Assessment Background and Modeling Data The chronic hazard analysis for DPM is provided in Appendix C. The calculations contain the relevant exposure concentrations and corresponding reference dose values used in the evaluation of non-carcinogenic exposures. 1.5.3 Criteria Pollutants The BAAQMD has recently incorporated PM2.5 into the District’s CEQA significance thresholds due to recent studies that show adverse health impacts from exposure to this pollutant. An incremental increase of greater than 0.3 µg/m3 for the annual average PM2.5 concentration is considered to be a significant impact. 1.6 CONSTRUCTION HRA RESULTS The calculated results are provided in Appendix C and the results are summarized in Table 1. TABLE 1. CONSTRUCTION RISK SUMMARY ‐ UNMITIGATED Receptor Cancer Risk  (per million)  Chronic   Hazards  PM2.5  (µg/m3)  Maximum Exposed Receptor – Offsite Residences 33.4 0.10 0.19 BAAQMD Threshold 10 1.0 0.30 Exceeds Threshold? Yes No No Note: Cancer risk calculated using 2015 OEHHA HRA guidance.  Cancer risk for the maximum exposed receptor (MER) from project-related construction emissions was calculated to be 33.4 in a million, which exceeds the 10 in a million significance threshold. In accordance with the latest 2015 OEHHA guidance, the calculated total cancer risk conservatively assumes that the risk for the MER consists of a pregnant woman in the third trimester that subsequently gives birth to an infant during the approximately 20-month construction period; therefore, all calculated risk values were multiplied by a factor of 10. In addition, it was conservatively assumed that the residents were outdoors 8 hours a day, 260 construction days per year and exposed to all of the daily construction emissions. For non-carcinogenic effects, the chronic hazard index identified for each toxicological endpoint totaled less than one for all the off-site sensitive receptors. Therefore, chronic non-carcinogenic hazards are within acceptable limits. The highest PM2.5 annual concentration of 0.19 is below the BAAQMD significance threshold of 0.3 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3). Because cancer risk for the MER would exceed BAAQMD’s significance thresholds due to construction activities associated with the proposed project, the following mitigation measure is proposed: Mitigation Measure AQ-2: During construction, the construction contractor(s) shall use construction equipment fitted with Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) for all equipment of 50 horsepower or more. The construction contractor shall maintain a list of all operating equipment in use on the project site for verification by the City of Cupertino Building Division official or his/her designee. The construction equipment list shall state the makes, models, and number of construction equipment on-site. Equipment shall be properly serviced and Health Risk Assessment Background and Modeling Data Page 7 maintained in accordance with manufacturer recommendations. The construction contractor shall ensure that all nonessential idling of construction equipment is restricted to five minutes or less in compliance with California Air Resources Board Rule 2449. Prior to issuance of any construction permit, the construction contractor shall ensure that all construction plans submitted to the City of Cupertino Planning Department and/or Building Division clearly show the requirement for Level 3 DPF emissions standards for construction equipment over 50 horsepower. Mitigation Measure AQ-2 would reduce the project’s localized construction emissions, as shown in the following table. The results indicate that, with mitigation, cancer risk would be less than the BAAQMD’s significance thresholds for residential-based receptors. Therefore, the project would not expose off-site sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of air pollutant emissions during construction and impacts would be less than significant with mitigation. TABLE 2  CONSTRUCTION RISK SUMMARY – MITIGATED Receptor Cancer Risk  (per million)  Chronic   Hazards  PM2.5  (µg/m3)a  Maximum Exposed Receptor – Offsite Residences 5.1 0.015 0.03 BAAQMD Threshold 10 1.0 0.3 Exceeds Threshold? No No No Risks incorporate Mitigation Measure AQ‐2, which includes using construction equipment with Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters for equipment  over 50 horsepower.  Note: Cancer risk calculated using 2015 OEHHA HRA guidance.  Source: Google Earth Professional, 2018; PlaceWorks, 2018. Figure 1 Site and Off-Site Receptor Locations 0 Scale (Feet) 700 Junipero Serra Freeway Cupertino Hotel Aviare Apartments Villa Camino Apartments Homestead Square Shopping Center Public Storage E. Homestead Road N. De Anza BoulevardApple, Inc. Project Site Maximum Exposed Receptor - Residential Receptors - ResidentialTruck Route THE DE ANZA HOTEL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT CITY OF CUPERTINO PLACEWORKS Health Risk Assessment Background and Modeling Data Page 9 2. References Bay Area Air Quality Management District. 2017. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. ———. 2012. Recommended Methods for Screening and Modeling Local Risks and Hazards. Version 3.0. Dated May 2012. ———. 2010. Screening Tables for Air Toxics Evaluation During Construction. Version 1.0. Dated May 2010. ———. 2009-2013. Meteorological Data Set for N.Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport. California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). 2016. California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod). Version 2016.3.2. Prepared by: ENVIRON International Corporation and the California Air Districts. California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2000. Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines and Vehicles. ———. 2015. Meteorological Files. https://www.arb.ca.gov/toxics/harp/metfiles2.htm Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). 2015. Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Guidance Manual for the Preparation of Health Risk Assessments. Dated February, 2015. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2011. Exposure Factors Handbook 2011 Edition (Final). EPA/600/R-09/052F, 2011. ______. 2005. Guideline on Air Quality Models (Revised). EPA-450/2-78-027R. Page 10 Health Risk Assessment Background and Modeling Data This page intentionally left blank. Health Risk Assessment Background and Modeling Data Appendix A. Emission Rate Calculations Health Risk Assessment Background and Modeling Data This page intentionally left blank. Construction Emissions - DPM and PM2.5 Input to Risk Tables DPM 1 PM2.5 2 2020 On-site Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day)0.49 0.46 Emissions Average Daily Emissions (lbs/hr)6.17E-02 5.75E-02 Emission Rate (g/s)7.77E-03 7.25E-03 2021 On-site Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day)0.45 0.41 Emissions Average Daily Emissions (lbs/hr)5.59E-02 5.14E-02 Emission Rate (g/s)7.05E-03 6.48E-03 2022 On-site Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day)0.25 0.24 Emissions Average Daily Emissions (lbs/hr)3.16E-02 2.95E-02 Emission Rate (g/s)3.98E-03 3.71E-03 Note: Emissions assumed to be evenly distributed over entire construction phase area. DPM 1 PM2.5 2 2020 Off-site Haul Length Daily Emissions (lbs/day)0.094 0.090 Emissions Hauling Emissions w/in 1,000 ft (lbs/day) 3 1.46E-03 1.40E-03 Emission Rate (lbs/hr)1.83E-04 1.75E-04 Emission Rate (g/s)2.30E-05 2.20E-05 2021 Off-site Haul Length Daily Emissions (lbs/day)0.013 0.013 Emissions Hauling Emissions w/in 1,000 ft (lbs/day) 3 2.09E-04 1.97E-04 Emission Rate (lbs/hr)2.61E-05 2.46E-05 Emission Rate (g/s)3.29E-06 3.11E-06 2022 Off-site Haul Length Daily Emissions (lbs/day)0.006 0.005 Emissions Hauling Emissions w/in 1,000 ft (lbs/day) 3 9.02E-05 8.45E-05 Emission Rate (lbs/hr)1.13E-05 1.06E-05 Emission Rate (g/s)1.42E-06 1.33E-06 Note: Emissions evenly distributed over 51 modeled volume sources. 8 hours Year Workdays Risk Scalar 5 2020 109 0.42 2021 261 1.00 2022 55 0.21 Average Hauling Length (miles) 20.0 Haul Length within 1,000 ft of Site (mile) 3 0.31 1 DPM emissions taken as PM10 exhaust emissions from CalEEMod average daily emissions. 2 PM2.5 emissions taken as PM2.5 exhaust emissions from CalEEMod average daily emissions. 5 Residential risk scalars determined for each year of construction to adjust receptor exposures to the exposure durations for each construction year (see App C - Risk Calculations). On-site Construction Emissions Off-site Construction Emissions 4 Work hours applied in By Hour/Day (HRDOW) variable emissions module in air dispersion model (see App B - Air Dispersion Model Output Files). Hours per work day (7:00 AM to 4:00 PM, 1-hour of breaks) 4 Total construction days per year 3 Emissions from CalEEMod offsite average daily emissions, which is based on proportioned haul truck trip distances proportioned to evaluate emissions from the 0.31-mile route within 1,000 of the project site. Construction Emissions - DPM and PM2.5 Input to Risk Tables With Mitigation - Level 3 DPF's for Eq. > 50 hp DPM 1 PM2.5 2 2020 On-site Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day)0.07 0.07 Emissions Average Daily Emissions (lbs/hr)9.27E-03 8.62E-03 Emission Rate (g/s)1.17E-03 1.09E-03 2021 On-site Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day)0.07 0.06 Emissions Average Daily Emissions (lbs/hr)8.39E-03 7.72E-03 Emission Rate (g/s)1.06E-03 9.73E-04 2022 On-site Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day)0.04 0.04 Emissions Average Daily Emissions (lbs/hr)5.55E-03 5.23E-03 Emission Rate (g/s)6.99E-04 6.59E-04 Note: Emissions assumed to be evenly distributed over entire construction phase area. DPM 1 PM2.5 2 2020 Off-site Haul Length Daily Emissions (lbs/day)0.094 0.090 Emissions Hauling Emissions w/in 1,000 ft (lbs/day) 3 1.46E-03 1.40E-03 Emission Rate (lbs/hr)1.83E-04 1.75E-04 Emission Rate (g/s)2.30E-05 2.20E-05 2021 Off-site Haul Length Daily Emissions (lbs/day)0.013 0.013 Emissions Hauling Emissions w/in 1,000 ft (lbs/day) 3 2.09E-04 1.97E-04 Emission Rate (lbs/hr)2.61E-05 2.46E-05 Emission Rate (g/s)3.29E-06 3.11E-06 2022 Off-site Haul Length Daily Emissions (lbs/day)0.006 0.005 Emissions Hauling Emissions w/in 1,000 ft (lbs/day) 3 9.02E-05 8.45E-05 Emission Rate (lbs/hr)1.13E-05 1.06E-05 Emission Rate (g/s)1.42E-06 1.33E-06 Note: Emissions evenly distributed over 51 modeled volume sources. 8 hours Year Workdays Risk Scalar 5 2020 109 0.42 2021 261 1.00 2022 55 0.21 Average Hauling Length (miles) 20.0 Haul Length within 1,000 ft of Site (mile) 3 0.31 1 DPM emissions taken as PM10 exhaust emissions from CalEEMod average daily emissions. 2 PM2.5 emissions taken as PM2.5 exhaust emissions from CalEEMod average daily emissions. 5 Residential risk scalars determined for each year of construction to adjust receptor exposures to the exposure durations for each construction year (see App C - Risk Calculations). On-site Construction Emissions - Mitigated Off-site Construction Emissions - Mitigated Hours per work day (7:00 AM to 4:00 PM, 1-hour of breaks) 4 Total construction days per year 3 Emissions from CalEEMod offsite average daily emissions, which is based on proportioned haul truck trip distances proportioned to evaluate emissions from the 0.31-mile route within 1,000 of the project site. 4 Work hours applied in By Hour/Day (HRDOW) variable emissions module in air dispersion model (see App B - Air Dispersion Model Output Files). Health Risk Assessment Background and Modeling Data Appendix B. Air Dispersion Model Output Health Risk Assessment Background and Modeling Data This page intentionally left blank. Results SummaryConstruction HRADe Anza HotelConcentration - Source Group: PAREA1AveragingPeriodRankPeakX(m)Y(m)ZELEV(m)ZHILL(m)Peak Date,Start HourZFLAG(m)UnitsPERIOD 25.51163 585747.79 4132572.51 63.86 0.00 63.86ug/m^3Concentration - Source Group: SLINE1AveragingPeriodRankPeakX(m)Y(m)ZELEV(m)ZHILL(m)Peak Date,Start HourZFLAG(m)UnitsPERIOD 9.02163 585747.79 4132557.78 63.94 0.00 63.94ug/m^3AERMOD View by Lakes Environmental Software1/4/2019Project File: C:\Users\jvang\Desktop\HRA\COCU-13\COCU13\COCU13.iscRS - 1 of 1Output Summary Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 1 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** MODEL SETUP OPTIONS SUMMARY *** - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - **Model Is Setup For Calculation of Average CONCentration Values. -- DEPOSITION LOGIC -- **NO GAS DEPOSITION Data Provided. **NO PARTICLE DEPOSITION Data Provided. **Model Uses NO DRY DEPLETION. DRYDPLT = F **Model Uses NO WET DEPLETION. WETDPLT = F **Model Uses URBAN Dispersion Algorithm for the SBL for 52 Source(s), for Total of 1 Urban Area(s): Urban Population = 1781642.0 ; Urban Roughness Length = 1.000 m **Model Uses Regulatory DEFAULT Options: 1. Stack-tip Downwash. 2. Model Accounts for ELEVated Terrain Effects. 3. Use Calms Processing Routine. 4. Use Missing Data Processing Routine. 5. No Exponential Decay. 6. Urban Roughness Length of 1.0 Meter Assumed. **Other Options Specified: CCVR_Sub - Meteorological data includes CCVR substitutions TEMP_Sub - Meteorological data includes TEMP substitutions **Model Accepts FLAGPOLE Receptor Heights. **The User Specified a Pollutant Type of: OTHER **Model Calculates PERIOD Averages Only **This Run Includes: 52 Source(s); 2 Source Group(s); and 1793 Receptor(s) with: 0 POINT(s), including 0 POINTCAP(s) and 0 POINTHOR(s) and: 51 VOLUME source(s) and: 1 AREA type source(s) and: 0 LINE source(s) and: 0 OPENPIT source(s) and: 0 BUOYANT LINE source(s) with 0 line(s) **Model Set To Continue RUNning After the Setup Testing. Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) **The AERMET Input Meteorological Data Version Date: 14134 **Output Options Selected: Model Outputs Tables of PERIOD Averages by Receptor Model Outputs External File(s) of High Values for Plotting (PLOTFILE Keyword) Model Outputs Separate Summary File of High Ranked Values (SUMMFILE Keyword) **NOTE: The Following Flags May Appear Following CONC Values: c for Calm Hours m for Missing Hours b for Both Calm and Missing Hours **Misc. Inputs: Base Elev. for Pot. Temp. Profile (m MSL) = 15.50 ; Decay Coef. = 0.000 ; Rot. Angle = 0.0 Emission Units = GRAMS/SEC ; Emission Rate Unit Factor = 0.10000E+07 Output Units = MICROGRAMS/M**3 **Approximate Storage Requirements of Model = 3.8 MB of RAM. **Input Runstream File: aermod.inp **Output Print File: aermod.out **Detailed Error/Message File: COCU13.err **File for Summary of Results: COCU13.sum Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 2 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** VOLUME SOURCE DATA *** NUMBER EMISSION RATE BASE RELEASE INIT. INIT. URBAN EMISSION RATE SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC) X Y ELEV. HEIGHT SY SZ SOURCE SCALAR VARY ID CATS. (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) BY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L0000001 0 0.19608E-01 585709.5 4132639.1 63.1 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000002 0 0.19608E-01 585709.3 4132629.1 63.3 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000003 0 0.19608E-01 585709.2 4132619.2 63.6 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000004 0 0.19608E-01 585709.0 4132609.2 63.9 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000005 0 0.19608E-01 585708.8 4132599.2 64.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000006 0 0.19608E-01 585708.7 4132589.2 64.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000007 0 0.19608E-01 585708.5 4132579.2 64.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000008 0 0.19608E-01 585708.4 4132569.2 64.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000009 0 0.19608E-01 585708.2 4132559.2 64.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000010 0 0.19608E-01 585708.1 4132549.2 64.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000011 0 0.19608E-01 585707.9 4132539.2 64.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000012 0 0.19608E-01 585707.7 4132529.2 64.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000013 0 0.19608E-01 585707.6 4132519.2 64.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000014 0 0.19608E-01 585707.4 4132509.2 64.2 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000015 0 0.19608E-01 585707.3 4132499.2 64.6 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000016 0 0.19608E-01 585707.1 4132489.2 64.9 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000017 0 0.19608E-01 585705.6 4132480.3 65.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000018 0 0.19608E-01 585695.9 4132477.8 65.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000019 0 0.19608E-01 585686.2 4132475.4 65.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000020 0 0.19608E-01 585676.5 4132473.0 65.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000021 0 0.19608E-01 585666.8 4132470.5 65.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000022 0 0.19608E-01 585657.1 4132468.1 65.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000023 0 0.19608E-01 585647.4 4132465.7 65.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000024 0 0.19608E-01 585637.7 4132463.2 65.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000025 0 0.19608E-01 585628.0 4132460.8 65.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000026 0 0.19608E-01 585618.3 4132458.4 65.1 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000027 0 0.19608E-01 585608.6 4132455.9 65.5 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000028 0 0.19608E-01 585598.9 4132453.5 65.8 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000029 0 0.19608E-01 585589.2 4132451.1 66.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000030 0 0.19608E-01 585579.5 4132448.6 66.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000031 0 0.19608E-01 585569.8 4132446.2 66.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000032 0 0.19608E-01 585560.1 4132443.8 66.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000033 0 0.19608E-01 585550.4 4132441.3 66.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000034 0 0.19608E-01 585540.7 4132439.1 66.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000035 0 0.19608E-01 585530.7 4132438.2 66.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000036 0 0.19608E-01 585520.8 4132437.3 66.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000037 0 0.19608E-01 585510.8 4132436.3 66.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000038 0 0.19608E-01 585500.8 4132435.4 66.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) L0000039 0 0.19608E-01 585490.9 4132434.5 66.3 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000040 0 0.19608E-01 585480.9 4132433.6 66.6 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000041 0 0.19608E-01 585471.0 4132432.6 66.8 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000042 0 0.19608E-01 585461.0 4132431.7 66.9 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000043 0 0.19608E-01 585451.1 4132430.8 67.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000044 0 0.19608E-01 585441.1 4132429.9 67.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000045 0 0.19608E-01 585431.1 4132429.0 67.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000046 0 0.19608E-01 585421.2 4132428.0 67.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000047 0 0.19608E-01 585411.2 4132427.1 67.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000048 0 0.19608E-01 585401.3 4132426.2 67.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000049 0 0.19608E-01 585391.3 4132425.3 67.0 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000050 0 0.19608E-01 585381.3 4132424.3 67.1 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW L0000051 0 0.19608E-01 585371.4 4132423.4 67.1 4.15 4.65 1.93 YES HRDOW *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 4 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** AREAPOLY SOURCE DATA *** NUMBER EMISSION RATE LOCATION OF AREA BASE RELEASE NUMBER INIT. URBAN EMISSION RATE SOURCE PART. (GRAMS/SEC X Y ELEV. HEIGHT OF VERTS. SZ SOURCE SCALAR VARY ID CATS. /METER**2) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) (METERS) BY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PAREA1 0 0.19510E-03 585646.0 4132651.5 64.0 4.15 6 1.93 YES HRDOW Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 5 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** SOURCE IDs DEFINING SOURCE GROUPS *** SRCGROUP ID SOURCE IDs ----------- ---------- PAREA1 PAREA1 , SLINE1 L0000001 , L0000002 , L0000003 , L0000004 , L0000005 , L0000006 , L0000007 , L0000008 , L0000009 , L0000010 , L0000011 , L0000012 , L0000013 , L0000014 , L0000015 , L0000016 , L0000017 , L0000018 , L0000019 , L0000020 , L0000021 , L0000022 , L0000023 , L0000024 , L0000025 , L0000026 , L0000027 , L0000028 , L0000029 , L0000030 , L0000031 , L0000032 , L0000033 , L0000034 , L0000035 , L0000036 , L0000037 , L0000038 , L0000039 , L0000040 , L0000041 , L0000042 , L0000043 , L0000044 , L0000045 , L0000046 , L0000047 , L0000048 , L0000049 , L0000050 , L0000051 , Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 6 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** SOURCE IDs DEFINED AS URBAN SOURCES *** URBAN ID URBAN POP SOURCE IDs -------- --------- ---------- 1781642. PAREA1 , L0000001 , L0000002 , L0000003 , L0000004 , L0000005 , L0000006 , L0000007 , L0000008 , L0000009 , L0000010 , L0000011 , L0000012 , L0000013 , L0000014 , L0000015 , L0000016 , L0000017 , L0000018 , L0000019 , L0000020 , L0000021 , L0000022 , L0000023 , L0000024 , L0000025 , L0000026 , L0000027 , L0000028 , L0000029 , L0000030 , L0000031 , L0000032 , L0000033 , L0000034 , L0000035 , L0000036 , L0000037 , L0000038 , L0000039 , L0000040 , L0000041 , L0000042 , L0000043 , L0000044 , L0000045 , L0000046 , L0000047 , L0000048 , L0000049 , L0000050 , L0000051 , Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 7 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN * SOURCE EMISSION RATE SCALARS WHICH VARY DIURNALLY AND BY DAY OF WEEK (HRDOW) * SOURCE ID = PAREA1 ; SOURCE TYPE = AREAPOLY : HOUR SCALAR HOUR SCALAR HOUR SCALAR HOUR SCALAR HOUR SCALAR HOUR SCALAR HOUR SCALAR HOUR SCALAR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DAY OF WEEK = WEEKDAY 1 .0000E+00 2 .0000E+00 3 .0000E+00 4 .0000E+00 5 .0000E+00 6 .0000E+00 7 .0000E+00 8 .1000E+01 9 .1000E+01 10 .1000E+01 11 .1000E+01 12 .0000E+00 13 .1000E+01 14 .1000E+01 15 .1000E+01 16 .1000E+01 17 .0000E+00 18 .0000E+00 19 .0000E+00 20 .0000E+00 21 .0000E+00 22 .0000E+00 23 .0000E+00 24 .0000E+00 DAY OF WEEK = SATURDAY 1 .0000E+00 2 .0000E+00 3 .0000E+00 4 .0000E+00 5 .0000E+00 6 .0000E+00 7 .0000E+00 8 .0000E+00 9 .0000E+00 10 .0000E+00 11 .0000E+00 12 .0000E+00 13 .0000E+00 14 .0000E+00 15 .0000E+00 16 .0000E+00 17 .0000E+00 18 .0000E+00 19 .0000E+00 20 .0000E+00 21 .0000E+00 22 .0000E+00 23 .0000E+00 24 .0000E+00 DAY OF WEEK = SUNDAY 1 .0000E+00 2 .0000E+00 3 .0000E+00 4 .0000E+00 5 .0000E+00 6 .0000E+00 7 .0000E+00 8 .0000E+00 9 .0000E+00 10 .0000E+00 11 .0000E+00 12 .0000E+00 13 .0000E+00 14 .0000E+00 15 .0000E+00 16 .0000E+00 17 .0000E+00 18 .0000E+00 19 .0000E+00 20 .0000E+00 21 .0000E+00 22 .0000E+00 23 .0000E+00 24 .0000E+00 *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 8 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN * SOURCE EMISSION RATE SCALARS WHICH VARY DIURNALLY AND BY DAY OF WEEK (HRDOW) * SOURCE ID = L0000001 through L0000051 ; SOURCE TYPE = VOLUME : HOUR SCALAR HOUR SCALAR HOUR SCALAR HOUR SCALAR HOUR SCALAR HOUR SCALAR HOUR SCALAR HOUR SCALAR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DAY OF WEEK = WEEKDAY 1 .0000E+00 2 .0000E+00 3 .0000E+00 4 .0000E+00 5 .0000E+00 6 .0000E+00 7 .0000E+00 8 .1000E+01 9 .1000E+01 10 .1000E+01 11 .1000E+01 12 .0000E+00 13 .1000E+01 14 .1000E+01 15 .1000E+01 16 .1000E+01 17 .0000E+00 18 .0000E+00 19 .0000E+00 20 .0000E+00 21 .0000E+00 22 .0000E+00 23 .0000E+00 24 .0000E+00 DAY OF WEEK = SATURDAY 1 .0000E+00 2 .0000E+00 3 .0000E+00 4 .0000E+00 5 .0000E+00 6 .0000E+00 7 .0000E+00 8 .0000E+00 9 .0000E+00 10 .0000E+00 11 .0000E+00 12 .0000E+00 13 .0000E+00 14 .0000E+00 15 .0000E+00 16 .0000E+00 17 .0000E+00 18 .0000E+00 19 .0000E+00 20 .0000E+00 21 .0000E+00 22 .0000E+00 23 .0000E+00 24 .0000E+00 DAY OF WEEK = SUNDAY 1 .0000E+00 2 .0000E+00 3 .0000E+00 4 .0000E+00 5 .0000E+00 6 .0000E+00 7 .0000E+00 8 .0000E+00 9 .0000E+00 10 .0000E+00 11 .0000E+00 12 .0000E+00 13 .0000E+00 14 .0000E+00 15 .0000E+00 16 .0000E+00 17 .0000E+00 18 .0000E+00 19 .0000E+00 20 .0000E+00 21 .0000E+00 22 .0000E+00 23 .0000E+00 24 .0000E+00 Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 59 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS *** (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG) (METERS) ( 585976.8, 4132454.7, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132454.7, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585913.2, 4132469.4, 63.2, 63.2, 0.0); ( 585925.9, 4132469.4, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585938.6, 4132469.4, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585951.3, 4132469.4, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585964.0, 4132469.4, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132469.4, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132469.4, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585836.8, 4132484.1, 64.0, 64.0, 0.0); ( 585849.6, 4132484.1, 64.0, 64.0, 0.0); ( 585862.3, 4132484.1, 64.0, 64.0, 0.0); ( 585875.0, 4132484.1, 63.6, 63.6, 0.0); ( 585887.7, 4132484.1, 63.2, 63.2, 0.0); ( 585900.4, 4132484.1, 63.1, 63.1, 0.0); ( 585913.2, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585925.9, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585938.6, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585951.3, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585964.0, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585773.2, 4132498.9, 64.0, 64.0, 0.0); ( 585786.0, 4132498.9, 64.0, 64.0, 0.0); ( 585798.7, 4132498.9, 64.0, 64.0, 0.0); ( 585811.4, 4132498.9, 63.9, 63.9, 0.0); ( 585836.8, 4132498.9, 63.6, 63.6, 0.0); ( 585849.6, 4132498.9, 63.6, 63.6, 0.0); ( 585862.3, 4132498.9, 63.6, 63.6, 0.0); ( 585875.0, 4132498.9, 63.4, 63.4, 0.0); ( 585887.7, 4132498.9, 63.1, 63.1, 0.0); ( 585900.4, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585913.2, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585925.9, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585938.6, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585951.3, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585964.0, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132498.9, 62.9, 62.9, 0.0); ( 585760.5, 4132513.6, 64.0, 64.0, 0.0); ( 585773.2, 4132513.6, 64.0, 64.0, 0.0); ( 585786.0, 4132513.6, 64.0, 64.0, 0.0); ( 585798.7, 4132513.6, 64.0, 64.0, 0.0); ( 585811.4, 4132513.6, 63.8, 63.8, 0.0); ( 585836.8, 4132513.6, 63.1, 63.1, 0.0); ( 585849.6, 4132513.6, 63.1, 63.1, 0.0); ( 585862.3, 4132513.6, 63.1, 63.1, 0.0); ( 585875.0, 4132513.6, 63.1, 63.1, 0.0); ( 585887.7, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585900.4, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585913.2, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585925.9, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585938.6, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585951.3, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585964.0, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132513.6, 62.8, 62.8, 0.0); ( 585760.5, 4132528.3, 64.0, 64.0, 0.0); ( 585773.2, 4132528.3, 64.0, 64.0, 0.0); ( 585786.0, 4132528.3, 63.8, 63.8, 0.0); ( 585798.7, 4132528.3, 63.7, 63.7, 0.0); ( 585811.4, 4132528.3, 63.4, 63.4, 0.0); ( 585836.8, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585849.6, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585862.3, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585875.0, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585887.7, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585900.4, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585913.2, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585925.9, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585938.6, 4132528.3, 62.8, 62.8, 0.0); ( 585951.3, 4132528.3, 62.6, 62.6, 0.0); ( 585964.0, 4132528.3, 62.6, 62.6, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132528.3, 62.6, 62.6, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132528.3, 62.5, 62.5, 0.0); ( 585786.0, 4132543.0, 63.6, 63.6, 0.0); ( 585798.7, 4132543.0, 63.2, 63.2, 0.0); ( 585811.4, 4132543.0, 63.1, 63.1, 0.0); ( 585836.8, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585849.6, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585862.3, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585875.0, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585887.7, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585900.4, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) ( 585913.2, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585925.9, 4132543.0, 62.9, 62.9, 0.0); ( 585938.6, 4132543.0, 62.5, 62.5, 0.0); ( 585951.3, 4132543.0, 62.2, 62.2, 0.0); ( 585964.0, 4132543.0, 62.1, 62.1, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132543.0, 62.1, 62.1, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132543.0, 62.1, 62.1, 0.0); ( 585747.8, 4132557.8, 63.9, 63.9, 0.0); ( 585760.5, 4132557.8, 63.8, 63.8, 0.0); ( 585773.2, 4132557.8, 63.6, 63.6, 0.0); ( 585786.0, 4132557.8, 63.4, 63.4, 0.0); ( 585798.7, 4132557.8, 63.1, 63.1, 0.0); ( 585811.4, 4132557.8, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585836.8, 4132557.8, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585849.6, 4132557.8, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585862.3, 4132557.8, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585875.0, 4132557.8, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585887.7, 4132557.8, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585900.4, 4132557.8, 62.9, 62.9, 0.0); ( 585913.2, 4132557.8, 62.8, 62.8, 0.0); ( 585925.9, 4132557.8, 62.6, 62.6, 0.0); ( 585938.6, 4132557.8, 62.3, 62.3, 0.0); ( 585951.3, 4132557.8, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585964.0, 4132557.8, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132557.8, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132557.8, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585747.8, 4132572.5, 63.9, 63.9, 0.0); ( 585760.5, 4132572.5, 63.5, 63.5, 0.0); ( 585773.2, 4132572.5, 63.1, 63.1, 0.0); ( 585786.0, 4132572.5, 63.1, 63.1, 0.0); ( 585798.7, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585811.4, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585836.8, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585849.6, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585862.3, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585875.0, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585887.7, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585900.4, 4132572.5, 62.8, 62.8, 0.0); ( 585913.2, 4132572.5, 62.4, 62.4, 0.0); ( 585925.9, 4132572.5, 62.1, 62.1, 0.0); ( 585938.6, 4132572.5, 62.1, 62.1, 0.0); ( 585951.3, 4132572.5, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585964.0, 4132572.5, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132572.5, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132572.5, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585747.8, 4132587.2, 63.5, 63.5, 0.0); ( 585760.5, 4132587.2, 63.3, 63.3, 0.0); ( 585773.2, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585786.0, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585798.7, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585811.4, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585836.8, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585849.6, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585862.3, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585875.0, 4132587.2, 62.9, 62.9, 0.0); ( 585887.7, 4132587.2, 62.7, 62.7, 0.0); ( 585900.4, 4132587.2, 62.5, 62.5, 0.0); ( 585913.2, 4132587.2, 62.2, 62.2, 0.0); ( 585925.9, 4132587.2, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585938.6, 4132587.2, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585951.3, 4132587.2, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585964.0, 4132587.2, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132587.2, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132587.2, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585786.0, 4132602.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585798.7, 4132602.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585811.4, 4132602.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585836.8, 4132602.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585849.6, 4132602.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585862.3, 4132602.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585875.0, 4132602.0, 62.7, 62.7, 0.0); ( 585887.7, 4132602.0, 62.3, 62.3, 0.0); ( 585900.4, 4132602.0, 62.1, 62.1, 0.0); ( 585913.2, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585925.9, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585938.6, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585951.3, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585964.0, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585747.8, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585760.5, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585773.2, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585786.0, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585798.7, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585811.4, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585836.8, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585849.6, 4132616.7, 62.8, 62.8, 0.0); ( 585862.3, 4132616.7, 62.7, 62.7, 0.0); ( 585875.0, 4132616.7, 62.4, 62.4, 0.0); ( 585887.7, 4132616.7, 62.1, 62.1, 0.0); ( 585900.4, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585913.2, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585925.9, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585938.6, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585951.3, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 61 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS *** (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG) (METERS) ( 585964.0, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132616.7, 61.9, 61.9, 0.0); ( 585747.8, 4132631.4, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585760.5, 4132631.4, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585773.2, 4132631.4, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585786.0, 4132631.4, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585798.7, 4132631.4, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585811.4, 4132631.4, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585836.8, 4132631.4, 62.9, 62.9, 0.0); ( 585849.6, 4132631.4, 62.5, 62.5, 0.0); ( 585862.3, 4132631.4, 62.2, 62.2, 0.0); ( 585875.0, 4132631.4, 62.1, 62.1, 0.0); ( 585887.7, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585900.4, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585913.2, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585925.9, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585938.6, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585951.3, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585964.0, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132631.4, 61.8, 61.8, 0.0); ( 585747.8, 4132646.2, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585760.5, 4132646.2, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585773.2, 4132646.2, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585786.0, 4132646.2, 62.9, 62.9, 0.0); ( 585798.7, 4132646.2, 62.7, 62.7, 0.0); ( 585811.4, 4132646.2, 62.7, 62.7, 0.0); ( 585836.8, 4132646.2, 62.6, 62.6, 0.0); ( 585849.6, 4132646.2, 62.3, 62.3, 0.0); ( 585862.3, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585875.0, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585887.7, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585900.4, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585913.2, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585925.9, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585938.6, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585951.3, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585964.0, 4132646.2, 61.9, 61.9, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132646.2, 61.8, 61.8, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132646.2, 61.5, 61.5, 0.0); ( 585798.7, 4132660.9, 62.3, 62.3, 0.0); ( 585811.4, 4132660.9, 62.2, 62.2, 0.0); ( 585836.8, 4132660.9, 62.2, 62.2, 0.0); ( 585849.6, 4132660.9, 62.1, 62.1, 0.0); ( 585862.3, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585875.0, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585887.7, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585900.4, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585913.2, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585925.9, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585938.6, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585951.3, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585964.0, 4132660.9, 61.7, 61.7, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132660.9, 61.4, 61.4, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132660.9, 61.1, 61.1, 0.0); ( 585798.7, 4132675.6, 62.1, 62.1, 0.0); ( 585811.4, 4132675.6, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585836.8, 4132675.6, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585849.6, 4132675.6, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585862.3, 4132675.6, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585798.7, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585811.4, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585836.8, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585849.6, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585862.3, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585875.0, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585887.7, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585900.4, 4132690.3, 61.8, 61.8, 0.0); ( 585913.2, 4132690.3, 61.5, 61.5, 0.0); ( 585925.9, 4132690.3, 61.2, 61.2, 0.0); ( 585938.6, 4132690.3, 61.2, 61.2, 0.0); ( 585951.3, 4132690.3, 61.2, 61.2, 0.0); ( 585964.0, 4132690.3, 61.1, 61.1, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132690.3, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132690.3, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585773.2, 4132705.1, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585786.0, 4132705.1, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585798.7, 4132705.1, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585836.8, 4132705.1, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585849.6, 4132705.1, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585862.3, 4132705.1, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585875.0, 4132705.1, 61.9, 61.9, 0.0); ( 585887.7, 4132705.1, 61.8, 61.8, 0.0); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) ( 585900.4, 4132705.1, 61.5, 61.5, 0.0); ( 585913.2, 4132705.1, 61.2, 61.2, 0.0); ( 585925.9, 4132705.1, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585938.6, 4132705.1, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585951.3, 4132705.1, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585964.0, 4132705.1, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132705.1, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132705.1, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585773.2, 4132719.8, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585786.0, 4132719.8, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585798.7, 4132719.8, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585836.8, 4132719.8, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585849.6, 4132719.8, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585862.3, 4132719.8, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585875.0, 4132719.8, 61.7, 61.7, 0.0); ( 585887.7, 4132719.8, 61.4, 61.4, 0.0); ( 585900.4, 4132719.8, 61.2, 61.2, 0.0); ( 585913.2, 4132719.8, 61.1, 61.1, 0.0); ( 585925.9, 4132719.8, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585938.6, 4132719.8, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585951.3, 4132719.8, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585964.0, 4132719.8, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132719.8, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132719.8, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585773.2, 4132734.5, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585786.0, 4132734.5, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585798.7, 4132734.5, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585836.8, 4132734.5, 61.7, 61.7, 0.0); ( 585849.6, 4132734.5, 61.7, 61.7, 0.0); ( 585862.3, 4132734.5, 61.7, 61.7, 0.0); ( 585875.0, 4132734.5, 61.4, 61.4, 0.0); ( 585887.7, 4132734.5, 61.1, 61.1, 0.0); ( 585900.4, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585913.2, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585925.9, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585938.6, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585951.3, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585964.0, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585989.5, 4132734.5, 60.9, 60.9, 0.0); ( 585976.8, 4132454.7, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585989.5, 4132454.7, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585913.2, 4132469.4, 63.2, 63.2, 6.1); ( 585925.9, 4132469.4, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585938.6, 4132469.4, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585951.3, 4132469.4, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585964.0, 4132469.4, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132469.4, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585989.5, 4132469.4, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585836.8, 4132484.1, 64.0, 64.0, 6.1); ( 585849.6, 4132484.1, 64.0, 64.0, 6.1); ( 585862.3, 4132484.1, 64.0, 64.0, 6.1); ( 585875.0, 4132484.1, 63.6, 63.6, 6.1); ( 585887.7, 4132484.1, 63.2, 63.2, 6.1); ( 585900.4, 4132484.1, 63.1, 63.1, 6.1); ( 585913.2, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585925.9, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585938.6, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585951.3, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585964.0, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585989.5, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585773.2, 4132498.9, 64.0, 64.0, 6.1); ( 585786.0, 4132498.9, 64.0, 64.0, 6.1); ( 585798.7, 4132498.9, 64.0, 64.0, 6.1); ( 585811.4, 4132498.9, 63.9, 63.9, 6.1); ( 585836.8, 4132498.9, 63.6, 63.6, 6.1); ( 585849.6, 4132498.9, 63.6, 63.6, 6.1); ( 585862.3, 4132498.9, 63.6, 63.6, 6.1); ( 585875.0, 4132498.9, 63.4, 63.4, 6.1); ( 585887.7, 4132498.9, 63.1, 63.1, 6.1); ( 585900.4, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585913.2, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585925.9, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585938.6, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585951.3, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585964.0, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585989.5, 4132498.9, 62.9, 62.9, 6.1); ( 585760.5, 4132513.6, 64.0, 64.0, 6.1); ( 585773.2, 4132513.6, 64.0, 64.0, 6.1); ( 585786.0, 4132513.6, 64.0, 64.0, 6.1); ( 585798.7, 4132513.6, 64.0, 64.0, 6.1); ( 585811.4, 4132513.6, 63.8, 63.8, 6.1); ( 585836.8, 4132513.6, 63.1, 63.1, 6.1); ( 585849.6, 4132513.6, 63.1, 63.1, 6.1); ( 585862.3, 4132513.6, 63.1, 63.1, 6.1); ( 585875.0, 4132513.6, 63.1, 63.1, 6.1); ( 585887.7, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585900.4, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585913.2, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585925.9, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585938.6, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585951.3, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585964.0, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 63 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS *** (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG) (METERS) ( 585989.5, 4132513.6, 62.8, 62.8, 6.1); ( 585760.5, 4132528.3, 64.0, 64.0, 6.1); ( 585773.2, 4132528.3, 64.0, 64.0, 6.1); ( 585786.0, 4132528.3, 63.8, 63.8, 6.1); ( 585798.7, 4132528.3, 63.7, 63.7, 6.1); ( 585811.4, 4132528.3, 63.4, 63.4, 6.1); ( 585836.8, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585849.6, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585862.3, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585875.0, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585887.7, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585900.4, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585913.2, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585925.9, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585938.6, 4132528.3, 62.8, 62.8, 6.1); ( 585951.3, 4132528.3, 62.6, 62.6, 6.1); ( 585964.0, 4132528.3, 62.6, 62.6, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132528.3, 62.6, 62.6, 6.1); ( 585989.5, 4132528.3, 62.5, 62.5, 6.1); ( 585786.0, 4132543.0, 63.6, 63.6, 6.1); ( 585798.7, 4132543.0, 63.2, 63.2, 6.1); ( 585811.4, 4132543.0, 63.1, 63.1, 6.1); ( 585836.8, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585849.6, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585862.3, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585875.0, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585887.7, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585900.4, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585913.2, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585925.9, 4132543.0, 62.9, 62.9, 6.1); ( 585938.6, 4132543.0, 62.5, 62.5, 6.1); ( 585951.3, 4132543.0, 62.2, 62.2, 6.1); ( 585964.0, 4132543.0, 62.1, 62.1, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132543.0, 62.1, 62.1, 6.1); ( 585989.5, 4132543.0, 62.1, 62.1, 6.1); ( 585747.8, 4132557.8, 63.9, 63.9, 6.1); ( 585760.5, 4132557.8, 63.8, 63.8, 6.1); ( 585773.2, 4132557.8, 63.6, 63.6, 6.1); ( 585786.0, 4132557.8, 63.4, 63.4, 6.1); ( 585798.7, 4132557.8, 63.1, 63.1, 6.1); ( 585811.4, 4132557.8, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585836.8, 4132557.8, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585849.6, 4132557.8, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585862.3, 4132557.8, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585875.0, 4132557.8, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585887.7, 4132557.8, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585900.4, 4132557.8, 62.9, 62.9, 6.1); ( 585913.2, 4132557.8, 62.8, 62.8, 6.1); ( 585925.9, 4132557.8, 62.6, 62.6, 6.1); ( 585938.6, 4132557.8, 62.3, 62.3, 6.1); ( 585951.3, 4132557.8, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585964.0, 4132557.8, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132557.8, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585989.5, 4132557.8, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585747.8, 4132572.5, 63.9, 63.9, 6.1); ( 585760.5, 4132572.5, 63.5, 63.5, 6.1); ( 585773.2, 4132572.5, 63.1, 63.1, 6.1); ( 585786.0, 4132572.5, 63.1, 63.1, 6.1); ( 585798.7, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585811.4, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585836.8, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585849.6, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585862.3, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585875.0, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585887.7, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585900.4, 4132572.5, 62.8, 62.8, 6.1); ( 585913.2, 4132572.5, 62.4, 62.4, 6.1); ( 585925.9, 4132572.5, 62.1, 62.1, 6.1); ( 585938.6, 4132572.5, 62.1, 62.1, 6.1); ( 585951.3, 4132572.5, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585964.0, 4132572.5, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132572.5, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585989.5, 4132572.5, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585747.8, 4132587.2, 63.5, 63.5, 6.1); ( 585760.5, 4132587.2, 63.3, 63.3, 6.1); ( 585773.2, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585786.0, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585798.7, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585811.4, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585836.8, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585849.6, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585862.3, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585875.0, 4132587.2, 62.9, 62.9, 6.1); ( 585887.7, 4132587.2, 62.7, 62.7, 6.1); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) ( 585900.4, 4132587.2, 62.5, 62.5, 6.1); ( 585913.2, 4132587.2, 62.2, 62.2, 6.1); ( 585925.9, 4132587.2, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585938.6, 4132587.2, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585951.3, 4132587.2, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585964.0, 4132587.2, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132587.2, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585989.5, 4132587.2, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585786.0, 4132602.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585798.7, 4132602.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585811.4, 4132602.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585836.8, 4132602.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585849.6, 4132602.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585862.3, 4132602.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585875.0, 4132602.0, 62.7, 62.7, 6.1); ( 585887.7, 4132602.0, 62.3, 62.3, 6.1); ( 585900.4, 4132602.0, 62.1, 62.1, 6.1); ( 585913.2, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585925.9, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585938.6, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585951.3, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585964.0, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585989.5, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585747.8, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585760.5, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585773.2, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585786.0, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585798.7, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585811.4, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585836.8, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585849.6, 4132616.7, 62.8, 62.8, 6.1); ( 585862.3, 4132616.7, 62.7, 62.7, 6.1); ( 585875.0, 4132616.7, 62.4, 62.4, 6.1); ( 585887.7, 4132616.7, 62.1, 62.1, 6.1); ( 585900.4, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585913.2, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585925.9, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585938.6, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585951.3, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585964.0, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585989.5, 4132616.7, 61.9, 61.9, 6.1); ( 585747.8, 4132631.4, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585760.5, 4132631.4, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585773.2, 4132631.4, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585786.0, 4132631.4, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585798.7, 4132631.4, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585811.4, 4132631.4, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585836.8, 4132631.4, 62.9, 62.9, 6.1); ( 585849.6, 4132631.4, 62.5, 62.5, 6.1); ( 585862.3, 4132631.4, 62.2, 62.2, 6.1); ( 585875.0, 4132631.4, 62.1, 62.1, 6.1); ( 585887.7, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585900.4, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585913.2, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585925.9, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585938.6, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585951.3, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585964.0, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585989.5, 4132631.4, 61.8, 61.8, 6.1); ( 585747.8, 4132646.2, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585760.5, 4132646.2, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585773.2, 4132646.2, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585786.0, 4132646.2, 62.9, 62.9, 6.1); ( 585798.7, 4132646.2, 62.7, 62.7, 6.1); ( 585811.4, 4132646.2, 62.7, 62.7, 6.1); ( 585836.8, 4132646.2, 62.6, 62.6, 6.1); ( 585849.6, 4132646.2, 62.3, 62.3, 6.1); ( 585862.3, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585875.0, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585887.7, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585900.4, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585913.2, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585925.9, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585938.6, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585951.3, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585964.0, 4132646.2, 61.9, 61.9, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132646.2, 61.8, 61.8, 6.1); ( 585989.5, 4132646.2, 61.5, 61.5, 6.1); ( 585798.7, 4132660.9, 62.3, 62.3, 6.1); ( 585811.4, 4132660.9, 62.2, 62.2, 6.1); ( 585836.8, 4132660.9, 62.2, 62.2, 6.1); ( 585849.6, 4132660.9, 62.1, 62.1, 6.1); ( 585862.3, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585875.0, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585887.7, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585900.4, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585913.2, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585925.9, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585938.6, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585951.3, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585964.0, 4132660.9, 61.7, 61.7, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132660.9, 61.4, 61.4, 6.1); ( 585989.5, 4132660.9, 61.1, 61.1, 6.1); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 65 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS *** (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG) (METERS) ( 585798.7, 4132675.6, 62.1, 62.1, 6.1); ( 585811.4, 4132675.6, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585836.8, 4132675.6, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585849.6, 4132675.6, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585862.3, 4132675.6, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585798.7, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585811.4, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585836.8, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585849.6, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585862.3, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585875.0, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585887.7, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585900.4, 4132690.3, 61.8, 61.8, 6.1); ( 585913.2, 4132690.3, 61.5, 61.5, 6.1); ( 585925.9, 4132690.3, 61.2, 61.2, 6.1); ( 585938.6, 4132690.3, 61.2, 61.2, 6.1); ( 585951.3, 4132690.3, 61.2, 61.2, 6.1); ( 585964.0, 4132690.3, 61.1, 61.1, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132690.3, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585989.5, 4132690.3, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585773.2, 4132705.1, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585786.0, 4132705.1, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585798.7, 4132705.1, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585836.8, 4132705.1, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585849.6, 4132705.1, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585862.3, 4132705.1, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585875.0, 4132705.1, 61.9, 61.9, 6.1); ( 585887.7, 4132705.1, 61.8, 61.8, 6.1); ( 585900.4, 4132705.1, 61.5, 61.5, 6.1); ( 585913.2, 4132705.1, 61.2, 61.2, 6.1); ( 585925.9, 4132705.1, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585938.6, 4132705.1, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585951.3, 4132705.1, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585964.0, 4132705.1, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132705.1, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585989.5, 4132705.1, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585773.2, 4132719.8, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585786.0, 4132719.8, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585798.7, 4132719.8, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585836.8, 4132719.8, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585849.6, 4132719.8, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585862.3, 4132719.8, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585875.0, 4132719.8, 61.7, 61.7, 6.1); ( 585887.7, 4132719.8, 61.4, 61.4, 6.1); ( 585900.4, 4132719.8, 61.2, 61.2, 6.1); ( 585913.2, 4132719.8, 61.1, 61.1, 6.1); ( 585925.9, 4132719.8, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585938.6, 4132719.8, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585951.3, 4132719.8, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585964.0, 4132719.8, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132719.8, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585989.5, 4132719.8, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585773.2, 4132734.5, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585786.0, 4132734.5, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585798.7, 4132734.5, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585836.8, 4132734.5, 61.7, 61.7, 6.1); ( 585849.6, 4132734.5, 61.7, 61.7, 6.1); ( 585862.3, 4132734.5, 61.7, 61.7, 6.1); ( 585875.0, 4132734.5, 61.4, 61.4, 6.1); ( 585887.7, 4132734.5, 61.1, 61.1, 6.1); ( 585900.4, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585913.2, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585925.9, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585938.6, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585951.3, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585964.0, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585989.5, 4132734.5, 60.9, 60.9, 6.1); ( 585976.8, 4132454.7, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132454.7, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585913.2, 4132469.4, 63.2, 63.2, 9.1); ( 585925.9, 4132469.4, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585938.6, 4132469.4, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585951.3, 4132469.4, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585964.0, 4132469.4, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585976.8, 4132469.4, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132469.4, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585836.8, 4132484.1, 64.0, 64.0, 9.1); ( 585849.6, 4132484.1, 64.0, 64.0, 9.1); ( 585862.3, 4132484.1, 64.0, 64.0, 9.1); ( 585875.0, 4132484.1, 63.6, 63.6, 9.1); ( 585887.7, 4132484.1, 63.2, 63.2, 9.1); ( 585900.4, 4132484.1, 63.1, 63.1, 9.1); ( 585913.2, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) ( 585925.9, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585938.6, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585951.3, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585964.0, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585976.8, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132484.1, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585773.2, 4132498.9, 64.0, 64.0, 9.1); ( 585786.0, 4132498.9, 64.0, 64.0, 9.1); ( 585798.7, 4132498.9, 64.0, 64.0, 9.1); ( 585811.4, 4132498.9, 63.9, 63.9, 9.1); ( 585836.8, 4132498.9, 63.6, 63.6, 9.1); ( 585849.6, 4132498.9, 63.6, 63.6, 9.1); ( 585862.3, 4132498.9, 63.6, 63.6, 9.1); ( 585875.0, 4132498.9, 63.4, 63.4, 9.1); ( 585887.7, 4132498.9, 63.1, 63.1, 9.1); ( 585900.4, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585913.2, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585925.9, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585938.6, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585951.3, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585964.0, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585976.8, 4132498.9, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132498.9, 62.9, 62.9, 9.1); ( 585760.5, 4132513.6, 64.0, 64.0, 9.1); ( 585773.2, 4132513.6, 64.0, 64.0, 9.1); ( 585786.0, 4132513.6, 64.0, 64.0, 9.1); ( 585798.7, 4132513.6, 64.0, 64.0, 9.1); ( 585811.4, 4132513.6, 63.8, 63.8, 9.1); ( 585836.8, 4132513.6, 63.1, 63.1, 9.1); ( 585849.6, 4132513.6, 63.1, 63.1, 9.1); ( 585862.3, 4132513.6, 63.1, 63.1, 9.1); ( 585875.0, 4132513.6, 63.1, 63.1, 9.1); ( 585887.7, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585900.4, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585913.2, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585925.9, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585938.6, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585951.3, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585964.0, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585976.8, 4132513.6, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132513.6, 62.8, 62.8, 9.1); ( 585760.5, 4132528.3, 64.0, 64.0, 9.1); ( 585773.2, 4132528.3, 64.0, 64.0, 9.1); ( 585786.0, 4132528.3, 63.8, 63.8, 9.1); ( 585798.7, 4132528.3, 63.7, 63.7, 9.1); ( 585811.4, 4132528.3, 63.4, 63.4, 9.1); ( 585836.8, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585849.6, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585862.3, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585875.0, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585887.7, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585900.4, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585913.2, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585925.9, 4132528.3, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585938.6, 4132528.3, 62.8, 62.8, 9.1); ( 585951.3, 4132528.3, 62.6, 62.6, 9.1); ( 585964.0, 4132528.3, 62.6, 62.6, 9.1); ( 585976.8, 4132528.3, 62.6, 62.6, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132528.3, 62.5, 62.5, 9.1); ( 585786.0, 4132543.0, 63.6, 63.6, 9.1); ( 585798.7, 4132543.0, 63.2, 63.2, 9.1); ( 585811.4, 4132543.0, 63.1, 63.1, 9.1); ( 585836.8, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585849.6, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585862.3, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585875.0, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585887.7, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585900.4, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585913.2, 4132543.0, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585925.9, 4132543.0, 62.9, 62.9, 9.1); ( 585938.6, 4132543.0, 62.5, 62.5, 9.1); ( 585951.3, 4132543.0, 62.2, 62.2, 9.1); ( 585964.0, 4132543.0, 62.1, 62.1, 9.1); ( 585976.8, 4132543.0, 62.1, 62.1, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132543.0, 62.1, 62.1, 9.1); ( 585747.8, 4132557.8, 63.9, 63.9, 9.1); ( 585760.5, 4132557.8, 63.8, 63.8, 9.1); ( 585773.2, 4132557.8, 63.6, 63.6, 9.1); ( 585786.0, 4132557.8, 63.4, 63.4, 9.1); ( 585798.7, 4132557.8, 63.1, 63.1, 9.1); ( 585811.4, 4132557.8, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585836.8, 4132557.8, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585849.6, 4132557.8, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585862.3, 4132557.8, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585875.0, 4132557.8, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585887.7, 4132557.8, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585900.4, 4132557.8, 62.9, 62.9, 9.1); ( 585913.2, 4132557.8, 62.8, 62.8, 9.1); ( 585925.9, 4132557.8, 62.6, 62.6, 9.1); ( 585938.6, 4132557.8, 62.3, 62.3, 9.1); ( 585951.3, 4132557.8, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585964.0, 4132557.8, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585976.8, 4132557.8, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132557.8, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585747.8, 4132572.5, 63.9, 63.9, 9.1); ( 585760.5, 4132572.5, 63.5, 63.5, 9.1); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 67 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS *** (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG) (METERS) ( 585773.2, 4132572.5, 63.1, 63.1, 9.1); ( 585786.0, 4132572.5, 63.1, 63.1, 9.1); ( 585798.7, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585811.4, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585836.8, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585849.6, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585862.3, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585875.0, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585887.7, 4132572.5, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585900.4, 4132572.5, 62.8, 62.8, 9.1); ( 585913.2, 4132572.5, 62.4, 62.4, 9.1); ( 585925.9, 4132572.5, 62.1, 62.1, 9.1); ( 585938.6, 4132572.5, 62.1, 62.1, 9.1); ( 585951.3, 4132572.5, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585964.0, 4132572.5, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585976.8, 4132572.5, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132572.5, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585747.8, 4132587.2, 63.5, 63.5, 9.1); ( 585760.5, 4132587.2, 63.3, 63.3, 9.1); ( 585773.2, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585786.0, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585798.7, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585811.4, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585836.8, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585849.6, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585862.3, 4132587.2, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585875.0, 4132587.2, 62.9, 62.9, 9.1); ( 585887.7, 4132587.2, 62.7, 62.7, 9.1); ( 585900.4, 4132587.2, 62.5, 62.5, 9.1); ( 585913.2, 4132587.2, 62.2, 62.2, 9.1); ( 585925.9, 4132587.2, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585938.6, 4132587.2, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585951.3, 4132587.2, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585964.0, 4132587.2, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585976.8, 4132587.2, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132587.2, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585786.0, 4132602.0, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585798.7, 4132602.0, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585811.4, 4132602.0, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585836.8, 4132602.0, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585849.6, 4132602.0, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585862.3, 4132602.0, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585875.0, 4132602.0, 62.7, 62.7, 9.1); ( 585887.7, 4132602.0, 62.3, 62.3, 9.1); ( 585900.4, 4132602.0, 62.1, 62.1, 9.1); ( 585913.2, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585925.9, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585938.6, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585951.3, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585964.0, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585976.8, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132602.0, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585747.8, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585760.5, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585773.2, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585786.0, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585798.7, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585811.4, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585836.8, 4132616.7, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585849.6, 4132616.7, 62.8, 62.8, 9.1); ( 585862.3, 4132616.7, 62.7, 62.7, 9.1); ( 585875.0, 4132616.7, 62.4, 62.4, 9.1); ( 585887.7, 4132616.7, 62.1, 62.1, 9.1); ( 585900.4, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585913.2, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585925.9, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585938.6, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585951.3, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585964.0, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585976.8, 4132616.7, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132616.7, 61.9, 61.9, 9.1); ( 585747.8, 4132631.4, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585760.5, 4132631.4, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585773.2, 4132631.4, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585786.0, 4132631.4, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585798.7, 4132631.4, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585811.4, 4132631.4, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585836.8, 4132631.4, 62.9, 62.9, 9.1); ( 585849.6, 4132631.4, 62.5, 62.5, 9.1); ( 585862.3, 4132631.4, 62.2, 62.2, 9.1); ( 585875.0, 4132631.4, 62.1, 62.1, 9.1); ( 585887.7, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585900.4, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585913.2, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) ( 585925.9, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585938.6, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585951.3, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585964.0, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585976.8, 4132631.4, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132631.4, 61.8, 61.8, 9.1); ( 585747.8, 4132646.2, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585760.5, 4132646.2, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585773.2, 4132646.2, 63.0, 63.0, 9.1); ( 585786.0, 4132646.2, 62.9, 62.9, 9.1); ( 585798.7, 4132646.2, 62.7, 62.7, 9.1); ( 585811.4, 4132646.2, 62.7, 62.7, 9.1); ( 585836.8, 4132646.2, 62.6, 62.6, 9.1); ( 585849.6, 4132646.2, 62.3, 62.3, 9.1); ( 585862.3, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585875.0, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585887.7, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585900.4, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585913.2, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585925.9, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585938.6, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585951.3, 4132646.2, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585964.0, 4132646.2, 61.9, 61.9, 9.1); ( 585976.8, 4132646.2, 61.8, 61.8, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132646.2, 61.5, 61.5, 9.1); ( 585798.7, 4132660.9, 62.3, 62.3, 9.1); ( 585811.4, 4132660.9, 62.2, 62.2, 9.1); ( 585836.8, 4132660.9, 62.2, 62.2, 9.1); ( 585849.6, 4132660.9, 62.1, 62.1, 9.1); ( 585862.3, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585875.0, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585887.7, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585900.4, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585913.2, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585925.9, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585938.6, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585951.3, 4132660.9, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585964.0, 4132660.9, 61.7, 61.7, 9.1); ( 585976.8, 4132660.9, 61.4, 61.4, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132660.9, 61.1, 61.1, 9.1); ( 585798.7, 4132675.6, 62.1, 62.1, 9.1); ( 585811.4, 4132675.6, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585836.8, 4132675.6, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585849.6, 4132675.6, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585862.3, 4132675.6, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585798.7, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585811.4, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585836.8, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585849.6, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585862.3, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585875.0, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585887.7, 4132690.3, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585900.4, 4132690.3, 61.8, 61.8, 9.1); ( 585913.2, 4132690.3, 61.5, 61.5, 9.1); ( 585925.9, 4132690.3, 61.2, 61.2, 9.1); ( 585938.6, 4132690.3, 61.2, 61.2, 9.1); ( 585951.3, 4132690.3, 61.2, 61.2, 9.1); ( 585964.0, 4132690.3, 61.1, 61.1, 9.1); ( 585976.8, 4132690.3, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132690.3, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585773.2, 4132705.1, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585786.0, 4132705.1, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585798.7, 4132705.1, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585836.8, 4132705.1, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585849.6, 4132705.1, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585862.3, 4132705.1, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585875.0, 4132705.1, 61.9, 61.9, 9.1); ( 585887.7, 4132705.1, 61.8, 61.8, 9.1); ( 585900.4, 4132705.1, 61.5, 61.5, 9.1); ( 585913.2, 4132705.1, 61.2, 61.2, 9.1); ( 585925.9, 4132705.1, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585938.6, 4132705.1, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585951.3, 4132705.1, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585964.0, 4132705.1, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585976.8, 4132705.1, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132705.1, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585773.2, 4132719.8, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585786.0, 4132719.8, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585798.7, 4132719.8, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585836.8, 4132719.8, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585849.6, 4132719.8, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585862.3, 4132719.8, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585875.0, 4132719.8, 61.7, 61.7, 9.1); ( 585887.7, 4132719.8, 61.4, 61.4, 9.1); ( 585900.4, 4132719.8, 61.2, 61.2, 9.1); ( 585913.2, 4132719.8, 61.1, 61.1, 9.1); ( 585925.9, 4132719.8, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585938.6, 4132719.8, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585951.3, 4132719.8, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585964.0, 4132719.8, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585976.8, 4132719.8, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132719.8, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585773.2, 4132734.5, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585786.0, 4132734.5, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585798.7, 4132734.5, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 585836.8, 4132734.5, 61.7, 61.7, 9.1); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 69 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS *** (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG) (METERS) ( 585849.6, 4132734.5, 61.7, 61.7, 9.1); ( 585862.3, 4132734.5, 61.7, 61.7, 9.1); ( 585875.0, 4132734.5, 61.4, 61.4, 9.1); ( 585887.7, 4132734.5, 61.1, 61.1, 9.1); ( 585900.4, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585913.2, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585925.9, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585938.6, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585951.3, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585964.0, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585976.8, 4132734.5, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 585989.5, 4132734.5, 60.9, 60.9, 9.1); ( 586029.0, 4132717.0, 60.6, 60.6, 0.0); ( 586029.6, 4132701.9, 60.9, 60.9, 0.0); ( 586013.9, 4132672.4, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 586016.4, 4132658.5, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 586016.4, 4132644.7, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 586022.1, 4132624.6, 61.3, 61.3, 0.0); ( 586025.2, 4132597.5, 61.7, 61.7, 0.0); ( 586027.1, 4132562.9, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 586028.4, 4132554.1, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 586030.2, 4132544.1, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 586028.4, 4132529.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 586029.6, 4132518.3, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 586032.1, 4132508.8, 62.1, 62.1, 0.0); ( 586030.9, 4132494.4, 62.3, 62.3, 0.0); ( 586028.4, 4132478.0, 62.6, 62.6, 0.0); ( 586008.2, 4132749.1, 60.4, 60.4, 0.0); ( 586029.0, 4132717.0, 60.6, 60.6, 6.1); ( 586029.6, 4132701.9, 60.9, 60.9, 6.1); ( 586013.9, 4132672.4, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 586016.4, 4132658.5, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 586016.4, 4132644.7, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 586022.1, 4132624.6, 61.3, 61.3, 6.1); ( 586025.2, 4132597.5, 61.7, 61.7, 6.1); ( 586027.1, 4132562.9, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 586028.4, 4132554.1, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 586030.2, 4132544.1, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 586028.4, 4132529.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 586029.6, 4132518.3, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 586032.1, 4132508.8, 62.1, 62.1, 6.1); ( 586030.9, 4132494.4, 62.3, 62.3, 6.1); ( 586028.4, 4132478.0, 62.6, 62.6, 6.1); ( 586008.2, 4132749.1, 60.4, 60.4, 6.1); ( 586029.0, 4132717.0, 60.6, 60.6, 9.1); ( 586029.6, 4132701.9, 60.9, 60.9, 9.1); ( 586013.9, 4132672.4, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 586016.4, 4132658.5, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 586016.4, 4132644.7, 61.0, 61.0, 9.1); ( 586022.1, 4132624.6, 61.3, 61.3, 9.1); ( 586025.2, 4132597.5, 61.7, 61.7, 9.1); ( 586027.1, 4132562.9, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 586028.4, 4132554.1, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 586030.2, 4132544.1, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 586028.4, 4132529.0, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 586029.6, 4132518.3, 62.0, 62.0, 9.1); ( 586032.1, 4132508.8, 62.1, 62.1, 9.1); ( 586030.9, 4132494.4, 62.3, 62.3, 9.1); ( 586028.4, 4132478.0, 62.6, 62.6, 9.1); ( 586008.2, 4132749.1, 60.4, 60.4, 9.1); ( 586002.0, 4132796.2, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585989.4, 4132795.0, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585981.2, 4132829.6, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585980.6, 4132813.2, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585973.7, 4132794.4, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585961.1, 4132794.4, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585942.8, 4132794.4, 60.2, 60.2, 0.0); ( 585929.0, 4132794.4, 60.6, 60.6, 0.0); ( 585913.9, 4132794.4, 60.7, 60.7, 0.0); ( 585900.1, 4132795.0, 60.7, 60.7, 0.0); ( 585920.8, 4132828.9, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585921.5, 4132814.5, 60.1, 60.1, 0.0); ( 586002.0, 4132796.2, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585989.4, 4132795.0, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585981.2, 4132829.6, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585980.6, 4132813.2, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585973.7, 4132794.4, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585961.1, 4132794.4, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585942.8, 4132794.4, 60.2, 60.2, 6.1); ( 585929.0, 4132794.4, 60.6, 60.6, 6.1); ( 585913.9, 4132794.4, 60.7, 60.7, 6.1); ( 585900.1, 4132795.0, 60.7, 60.7, 6.1); ( 585920.8, 4132828.9, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585921.5, 4132814.5, 60.1, 60.1, 6.1); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) ( 585918.8, 4132861.8, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585934.9, 4132861.8, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585932.9, 4132881.1, 59.8, 59.8, 0.0); ( 585931.0, 4132902.9, 59.1, 59.1, 0.0); ( 585915.6, 4132899.0, 59.4, 59.4, 0.0); ( 585898.3, 4132863.1, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585886.1, 4132863.8, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585868.8, 4132863.1, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585881.0, 4132877.2, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585879.1, 4132896.5, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585863.7, 4132897.7, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585892.5, 4132904.8, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585918.8, 4132861.8, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585934.9, 4132861.8, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585932.9, 4132881.1, 59.8, 59.8, 6.1); ( 585931.0, 4132902.9, 59.1, 59.1, 6.1); ( 585915.6, 4132899.0, 59.4, 59.4, 6.1); ( 585898.3, 4132863.1, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585886.1, 4132863.8, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585868.8, 4132863.1, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585881.0, 4132877.2, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585879.1, 4132896.5, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585863.7, 4132897.7, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585892.5, 4132904.8, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585838.0, 4132855.4, 60.6, 60.6, 0.0); ( 585822.0, 4132856.1, 60.7, 60.7, 0.0); ( 585808.5, 4132854.8, 60.7, 60.7, 0.0); ( 585782.2, 4132856.7, 60.9, 60.9, 0.0); ( 585768.1, 4132856.1, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585753.4, 4132855.4, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585752.1, 4132874.7, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585753.4, 4132889.4, 60.6, 60.6, 0.0); ( 585752.7, 4132908.6, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585791.9, 4132875.9, 60.4, 60.4, 0.0); ( 585783.5, 4132888.1, 60.4, 60.4, 0.0); ( 585775.8, 4132900.9, 60.2, 60.2, 0.0); ( 585806.0, 4132889.4, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585820.1, 4132893.9, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585834.8, 4132901.6, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585814.3, 4132871.4, 60.2, 60.2, 0.0); ( 585838.0, 4132855.4, 60.6, 60.6, 6.1); ( 585822.0, 4132856.1, 60.7, 60.7, 6.1); ( 585808.5, 4132854.8, 60.7, 60.7, 6.1); ( 585782.2, 4132856.7, 60.9, 60.9, 6.1); ( 585768.1, 4132856.1, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585753.4, 4132855.4, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585752.1, 4132874.7, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585753.4, 4132889.4, 60.6, 60.6, 6.1); ( 585752.7, 4132908.6, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585791.9, 4132875.9, 60.4, 60.4, 6.1); ( 585783.5, 4132888.1, 60.4, 60.4, 6.1); ( 585775.8, 4132900.9, 60.2, 60.2, 6.1); ( 585806.0, 4132889.4, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585820.1, 4132893.9, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585834.8, 4132901.6, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585814.3, 4132871.4, 60.2, 60.2, 6.1); ( 585777.7, 4132934.3, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585753.4, 4132934.9, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585749.5, 4132949.7, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585779.0, 4132950.3, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585776.5, 4132974.1, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585748.2, 4132973.4, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585777.7, 4132934.3, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585753.4, 4132934.9, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585749.5, 4132949.7, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585779.0, 4132950.3, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585776.5, 4132974.1, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585748.2, 4132973.4, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585576.1, 4132774.0, 63.6, 63.6, 0.0); ( 585586.1, 4132774.0, 63.2, 63.2, 0.0); ( 585596.2, 4132774.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585606.2, 4132774.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585616.2, 4132774.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585626.3, 4132774.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585636.3, 4132774.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585646.4, 4132774.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585656.4, 4132774.0, 62.9, 62.9, 0.0); ( 585666.5, 4132774.0, 62.7, 62.7, 0.0); ( 585576.1, 4132784.0, 63.6, 63.6, 0.0); ( 585586.1, 4132784.0, 63.2, 63.2, 0.0); ( 585596.2, 4132784.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585606.2, 4132784.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585616.2, 4132784.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585626.3, 4132784.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585636.3, 4132784.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585646.4, 4132784.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585656.4, 4132784.0, 62.9, 62.9, 0.0); ( 585666.5, 4132784.0, 62.6, 62.6, 0.0); ( 585576.1, 4132794.0, 63.4, 63.4, 0.0); ( 585586.1, 4132794.0, 63.2, 63.2, 0.0); ( 585596.2, 4132794.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585606.2, 4132794.0, 62.9, 62.9, 0.0); ( 585616.2, 4132794.0, 62.8, 62.8, 0.0); ( 585626.3, 4132794.0, 62.8, 62.8, 0.0); ( 585636.3, 4132794.0, 62.8, 62.8, 0.0); ( 585646.4, 4132794.0, 62.8, 62.8, 0.0); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 71 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS *** (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG) (METERS) ( 585656.4, 4132794.0, 62.7, 62.7, 0.0); ( 585666.5, 4132794.0, 62.4, 62.4, 0.0); ( 585515.9, 4132824.0, 63.4, 63.4, 0.0); ( 585525.9, 4132824.0, 63.2, 63.2, 0.0); ( 585535.9, 4132824.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585546.0, 4132824.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585556.0, 4132824.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585566.1, 4132824.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585576.1, 4132824.0, 62.9, 62.9, 0.0); ( 585586.1, 4132824.0, 62.8, 62.8, 0.0); ( 585596.2, 4132824.0, 62.7, 62.7, 0.0); ( 585606.2, 4132824.0, 62.4, 62.4, 0.0); ( 585616.2, 4132824.0, 62.2, 62.2, 0.0); ( 585626.3, 4132824.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585636.3, 4132824.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585646.4, 4132824.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585656.4, 4132824.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585515.9, 4132834.0, 63.2, 63.2, 0.0); ( 585525.9, 4132834.0, 63.1, 63.1, 0.0); ( 585535.9, 4132834.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585546.0, 4132834.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585556.0, 4132834.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585566.1, 4132834.0, 62.9, 62.9, 0.0); ( 585576.1, 4132834.0, 62.8, 62.8, 0.0); ( 585586.1, 4132834.0, 62.6, 62.6, 0.0); ( 585596.2, 4132834.0, 62.4, 62.4, 0.0); ( 585606.2, 4132834.0, 62.2, 62.2, 0.0); ( 585616.2, 4132834.0, 62.1, 62.1, 0.0); ( 585626.3, 4132834.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585636.3, 4132834.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585646.4, 4132834.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585656.4, 4132834.0, 61.9, 61.9, 0.0); ( 585676.5, 4132834.0, 61.5, 61.5, 0.0); ( 585686.5, 4132834.0, 61.4, 61.4, 0.0); ( 585696.6, 4132834.0, 61.4, 61.4, 0.0); ( 585515.9, 4132844.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585525.9, 4132844.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585535.9, 4132844.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585546.0, 4132844.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585556.0, 4132844.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585566.1, 4132844.0, 62.9, 62.9, 0.0); ( 585576.1, 4132844.0, 62.6, 62.6, 0.0); ( 585586.1, 4132844.0, 62.3, 62.3, 0.0); ( 585596.2, 4132844.0, 62.1, 62.1, 0.0); ( 585606.2, 4132844.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585616.2, 4132844.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585626.3, 4132844.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585636.3, 4132844.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585646.4, 4132844.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585656.4, 4132844.0, 61.9, 61.9, 0.0); ( 585676.5, 4132844.0, 61.3, 61.3, 0.0); ( 585686.5, 4132844.0, 61.1, 61.1, 0.0); ( 585696.6, 4132844.0, 61.1, 61.1, 0.0); ( 585515.9, 4132854.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585525.9, 4132854.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585546.0, 4132854.0, 62.9, 62.9, 0.0); ( 585556.0, 4132854.0, 62.8, 62.8, 0.0); ( 585566.1, 4132854.0, 62.7, 62.7, 0.0); ( 585576.1, 4132854.0, 62.4, 62.4, 0.0); ( 585586.1, 4132854.0, 62.2, 62.2, 0.0); ( 585596.2, 4132854.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585606.2, 4132854.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585616.2, 4132854.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585626.3, 4132854.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585636.3, 4132854.0, 61.9, 61.9, 0.0); ( 585646.4, 4132854.0, 61.8, 61.8, 0.0); ( 585656.4, 4132854.0, 61.7, 61.7, 0.0); ( 585676.5, 4132854.0, 61.2, 61.2, 0.0); ( 585686.5, 4132854.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585696.6, 4132854.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585515.9, 4132864.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585525.9, 4132864.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585546.0, 4132864.0, 62.8, 62.8, 0.0); ( 585556.0, 4132864.0, 62.6, 62.6, 0.0); ( 585566.1, 4132864.0, 62.4, 62.4, 0.0); ( 585576.1, 4132864.0, 62.2, 62.2, 0.0); ( 585586.1, 4132864.0, 62.1, 62.1, 0.0); ( 585636.3, 4132864.0, 61.7, 61.7, 0.0); ( 585646.4, 4132864.0, 61.5, 61.5, 0.0); ( 585656.4, 4132864.0, 61.4, 61.4, 0.0); ( 585676.5, 4132864.0, 61.1, 61.1, 0.0); ( 585686.5, 4132864.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585696.6, 4132864.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585515.9, 4132874.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) ( 585525.9, 4132874.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585546.0, 4132874.0, 62.6, 62.6, 0.0); ( 585556.0, 4132874.0, 62.3, 62.3, 0.0); ( 585566.1, 4132874.0, 62.1, 62.1, 0.0); ( 585576.1, 4132874.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585586.1, 4132874.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585636.3, 4132874.0, 61.6, 61.6, 0.0); ( 585646.4, 4132874.0, 61.3, 61.3, 0.0); ( 585656.4, 4132874.0, 61.1, 61.1, 0.0); ( 585676.5, 4132874.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585686.5, 4132874.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585696.6, 4132874.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585515.9, 4132884.0, 62.9, 62.9, 0.0); ( 585525.9, 4132884.0, 62.8, 62.8, 0.0); ( 585546.0, 4132884.0, 62.4, 62.4, 0.0); ( 585556.0, 4132884.0, 62.2, 62.2, 0.0); ( 585566.1, 4132884.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585576.1, 4132884.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585636.3, 4132884.0, 61.4, 61.4, 0.0); ( 585646.4, 4132884.0, 61.2, 61.2, 0.0); ( 585656.4, 4132884.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585676.5, 4132884.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585686.5, 4132884.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585696.6, 4132884.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585515.9, 4132894.0, 62.8, 62.8, 0.0); ( 585525.9, 4132894.0, 62.6, 62.6, 0.0); ( 585546.0, 4132894.0, 62.2, 62.2, 0.0); ( 585556.0, 4132894.0, 62.1, 62.1, 0.0); ( 585566.1, 4132894.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585576.1, 4132894.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585636.3, 4132894.0, 61.2, 61.2, 0.0); ( 585646.4, 4132894.0, 61.1, 61.1, 0.0); ( 585656.4, 4132894.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585676.5, 4132894.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585686.5, 4132894.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585696.6, 4132894.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585515.9, 4132904.0, 62.6, 62.6, 0.0); ( 585525.9, 4132904.0, 62.3, 62.3, 0.0); ( 585546.0, 4132904.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585556.0, 4132904.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585566.1, 4132904.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585576.1, 4132904.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585586.1, 4132904.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585596.2, 4132904.0, 61.9, 61.9, 0.0); ( 585606.2, 4132904.0, 61.6, 61.6, 0.0); ( 585616.2, 4132904.0, 61.3, 61.3, 0.0); ( 585626.3, 4132904.0, 61.1, 61.1, 0.0); ( 585636.3, 4132904.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585646.4, 4132904.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585656.4, 4132904.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585676.5, 4132904.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585686.5, 4132904.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585696.6, 4132904.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585515.9, 4132914.0, 62.4, 62.4, 0.0); ( 585525.9, 4132914.0, 62.2, 62.2, 0.0); ( 585546.0, 4132914.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585556.0, 4132914.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585566.1, 4132914.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585576.1, 4132914.0, 61.9, 61.9, 0.0); ( 585586.1, 4132914.0, 61.8, 61.8, 0.0); ( 585596.2, 4132914.0, 61.7, 61.7, 0.0); ( 585606.2, 4132914.0, 61.4, 61.4, 0.0); ( 585616.2, 4132914.0, 61.2, 61.2, 0.0); ( 585626.3, 4132914.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585636.3, 4132914.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585646.4, 4132914.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585656.4, 4132914.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585676.5, 4132914.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585686.5, 4132914.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585696.6, 4132914.0, 60.9, 60.9, 0.0); ( 585515.9, 4132924.0, 62.2, 62.2, 0.0); ( 585525.9, 4132924.0, 62.1, 62.1, 0.0); ( 585546.0, 4132924.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585556.0, 4132924.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585566.1, 4132924.0, 61.9, 61.9, 0.0); ( 585576.1, 4132924.0, 61.8, 61.8, 0.0); ( 585586.1, 4132924.0, 61.6, 61.6, 0.0); ( 585596.2, 4132924.0, 61.4, 61.4, 0.0); ( 585606.2, 4132924.0, 61.2, 61.2, 0.0); ( 585616.2, 4132924.0, 61.1, 61.1, 0.0); ( 585626.3, 4132924.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585636.3, 4132924.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585646.4, 4132924.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585656.4, 4132924.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585676.5, 4132924.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585686.5, 4132924.0, 60.9, 60.9, 0.0); ( 585696.6, 4132924.0, 60.7, 60.7, 0.0); ( 585515.9, 4132934.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585525.9, 4132934.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585515.9, 4132944.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585525.9, 4132944.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585546.0, 4132944.0, 61.9, 61.9, 0.0); ( 585556.0, 4132944.0, 61.8, 61.8, 0.0); ( 585566.1, 4132944.0, 61.7, 61.7, 0.0); ( 585576.1, 4132944.0, 61.4, 61.4, 0.0); ( 585586.1, 4132944.0, 61.2, 61.2, 0.0); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 73 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS *** (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG) (METERS) ( 585596.2, 4132944.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585606.2, 4132944.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585616.2, 4132944.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585626.3, 4132944.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585636.3, 4132944.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585646.4, 4132944.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585656.4, 4132944.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585666.5, 4132944.0, 60.9, 60.9, 0.0); ( 585676.5, 4132944.0, 60.8, 60.8, 0.0); ( 585686.5, 4132944.0, 60.7, 60.7, 0.0); ( 585696.6, 4132944.0, 60.4, 60.4, 0.0); ( 585515.9, 4132954.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585525.9, 4132954.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585546.0, 4132954.0, 61.8, 61.8, 0.0); ( 585556.0, 4132954.0, 61.6, 61.6, 0.0); ( 585566.1, 4132954.0, 61.4, 61.4, 0.0); ( 585576.1, 4132954.0, 61.2, 61.2, 0.0); ( 585586.1, 4132954.0, 61.1, 61.1, 0.0); ( 585596.2, 4132954.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585606.2, 4132954.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585616.2, 4132954.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585626.3, 4132954.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585636.3, 4132954.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585646.4, 4132954.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585656.4, 4132954.0, 60.9, 60.9, 0.0); ( 585666.5, 4132954.0, 60.7, 60.7, 0.0); ( 585676.5, 4132954.0, 60.5, 60.5, 0.0); ( 585686.5, 4132954.0, 60.4, 60.4, 0.0); ( 585696.6, 4132954.0, 60.2, 60.2, 0.0); ( 585515.9, 4132964.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585525.9, 4132964.0, 62.0, 62.0, 0.0); ( 585546.0, 4132964.0, 61.6, 61.6, 0.0); ( 585556.0, 4132964.0, 61.3, 61.3, 0.0); ( 585566.1, 4132964.0, 61.1, 61.1, 0.0); ( 585576.1, 4132964.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585586.1, 4132964.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585596.2, 4132964.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585606.2, 4132964.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585616.2, 4132964.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585626.3, 4132964.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585636.3, 4132964.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585646.4, 4132964.0, 61.0, 61.0, 0.0); ( 585656.4, 4132964.0, 60.9, 60.9, 0.0); ( 585666.5, 4132964.0, 60.6, 60.6, 0.0); ( 585676.5, 4132964.0, 60.3, 60.3, 0.0); ( 585686.5, 4132964.0, 60.1, 60.1, 0.0); ( 585696.6, 4132964.0, 60.0, 60.0, 0.0); ( 585576.1, 4132774.0, 63.6, 63.6, 6.1); ( 585586.1, 4132774.0, 63.2, 63.2, 6.1); ( 585596.2, 4132774.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585606.2, 4132774.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585616.2, 4132774.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585626.3, 4132774.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585636.3, 4132774.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585646.4, 4132774.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585656.4, 4132774.0, 62.9, 62.9, 6.1); ( 585666.5, 4132774.0, 62.7, 62.7, 6.1); ( 585576.1, 4132784.0, 63.6, 63.6, 6.1); ( 585586.1, 4132784.0, 63.2, 63.2, 6.1); ( 585596.2, 4132784.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585606.2, 4132784.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585616.2, 4132784.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585626.3, 4132784.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585636.3, 4132784.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585646.4, 4132784.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585656.4, 4132784.0, 62.9, 62.9, 6.1); ( 585666.5, 4132784.0, 62.6, 62.6, 6.1); ( 585576.1, 4132794.0, 63.4, 63.4, 6.1); ( 585586.1, 4132794.0, 63.2, 63.2, 6.1); ( 585596.2, 4132794.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585606.2, 4132794.0, 62.9, 62.9, 6.1); ( 585616.2, 4132794.0, 62.8, 62.8, 6.1); ( 585626.3, 4132794.0, 62.8, 62.8, 6.1); ( 585636.3, 4132794.0, 62.8, 62.8, 6.1); ( 585646.4, 4132794.0, 62.8, 62.8, 6.1); ( 585656.4, 4132794.0, 62.7, 62.7, 6.1); ( 585666.5, 4132794.0, 62.4, 62.4, 6.1); ( 585515.9, 4132824.0, 63.4, 63.4, 6.1); ( 585525.9, 4132824.0, 63.2, 63.2, 6.1); ( 585535.9, 4132824.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585546.0, 4132824.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585556.0, 4132824.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585566.1, 4132824.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585576.1, 4132824.0, 62.9, 62.9, 6.1); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) ( 585586.1, 4132824.0, 62.8, 62.8, 6.1); ( 585596.2, 4132824.0, 62.7, 62.7, 6.1); ( 585606.2, 4132824.0, 62.4, 62.4, 6.1); ( 585616.2, 4132824.0, 62.2, 62.2, 6.1); ( 585626.3, 4132824.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585636.3, 4132824.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585646.4, 4132824.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585656.4, 4132824.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585515.9, 4132834.0, 63.2, 63.2, 6.1); ( 585525.9, 4132834.0, 63.1, 63.1, 6.1); ( 585535.9, 4132834.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585546.0, 4132834.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585556.0, 4132834.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585566.1, 4132834.0, 62.9, 62.9, 6.1); ( 585576.1, 4132834.0, 62.8, 62.8, 6.1); ( 585586.1, 4132834.0, 62.6, 62.6, 6.1); ( 585596.2, 4132834.0, 62.4, 62.4, 6.1); ( 585606.2, 4132834.0, 62.2, 62.2, 6.1); ( 585616.2, 4132834.0, 62.1, 62.1, 6.1); ( 585626.3, 4132834.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585636.3, 4132834.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585646.4, 4132834.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585656.4, 4132834.0, 61.9, 61.9, 6.1); ( 585676.5, 4132834.0, 61.5, 61.5, 6.1); ( 585686.5, 4132834.0, 61.4, 61.4, 6.1); ( 585696.6, 4132834.0, 61.4, 61.4, 6.1); ( 585515.9, 4132844.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585525.9, 4132844.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585535.9, 4132844.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585546.0, 4132844.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585556.0, 4132844.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585566.1, 4132844.0, 62.9, 62.9, 6.1); ( 585576.1, 4132844.0, 62.6, 62.6, 6.1); ( 585586.1, 4132844.0, 62.3, 62.3, 6.1); ( 585596.2, 4132844.0, 62.1, 62.1, 6.1); ( 585606.2, 4132844.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585616.2, 4132844.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585626.3, 4132844.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585636.3, 4132844.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585646.4, 4132844.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585656.4, 4132844.0, 61.9, 61.9, 6.1); ( 585676.5, 4132844.0, 61.3, 61.3, 6.1); ( 585686.5, 4132844.0, 61.1, 61.1, 6.1); ( 585696.6, 4132844.0, 61.1, 61.1, 6.1); ( 585515.9, 4132854.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585525.9, 4132854.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585546.0, 4132854.0, 62.9, 62.9, 6.1); ( 585556.0, 4132854.0, 62.8, 62.8, 6.1); ( 585566.1, 4132854.0, 62.7, 62.7, 6.1); ( 585576.1, 4132854.0, 62.4, 62.4, 6.1); ( 585586.1, 4132854.0, 62.2, 62.2, 6.1); ( 585596.2, 4132854.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585606.2, 4132854.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585616.2, 4132854.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585626.3, 4132854.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585636.3, 4132854.0, 61.9, 61.9, 6.1); ( 585646.4, 4132854.0, 61.8, 61.8, 6.1); ( 585656.4, 4132854.0, 61.7, 61.7, 6.1); ( 585676.5, 4132854.0, 61.2, 61.2, 6.1); ( 585686.5, 4132854.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585696.6, 4132854.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585515.9, 4132864.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585525.9, 4132864.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585546.0, 4132864.0, 62.8, 62.8, 6.1); ( 585556.0, 4132864.0, 62.6, 62.6, 6.1); ( 585566.1, 4132864.0, 62.4, 62.4, 6.1); ( 585576.1, 4132864.0, 62.2, 62.2, 6.1); ( 585586.1, 4132864.0, 62.1, 62.1, 6.1); ( 585636.3, 4132864.0, 61.7, 61.7, 6.1); ( 585646.4, 4132864.0, 61.5, 61.5, 6.1); ( 585656.4, 4132864.0, 61.4, 61.4, 6.1); ( 585676.5, 4132864.0, 61.1, 61.1, 6.1); ( 585686.5, 4132864.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585696.6, 4132864.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585515.9, 4132874.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585525.9, 4132874.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585546.0, 4132874.0, 62.6, 62.6, 6.1); ( 585556.0, 4132874.0, 62.3, 62.3, 6.1); ( 585566.1, 4132874.0, 62.1, 62.1, 6.1); ( 585576.1, 4132874.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585586.1, 4132874.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585636.3, 4132874.0, 61.6, 61.6, 6.1); ( 585646.4, 4132874.0, 61.3, 61.3, 6.1); ( 585656.4, 4132874.0, 61.1, 61.1, 6.1); ( 585676.5, 4132874.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585686.5, 4132874.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585696.6, 4132874.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585515.9, 4132884.0, 62.9, 62.9, 6.1); ( 585525.9, 4132884.0, 62.8, 62.8, 6.1); ( 585546.0, 4132884.0, 62.4, 62.4, 6.1); ( 585556.0, 4132884.0, 62.2, 62.2, 6.1); ( 585566.1, 4132884.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585576.1, 4132884.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585636.3, 4132884.0, 61.4, 61.4, 6.1); ( 585646.4, 4132884.0, 61.2, 61.2, 6.1); ( 585656.4, 4132884.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 75 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS *** (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG) (METERS) ( 585676.5, 4132884.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585686.5, 4132884.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585696.6, 4132884.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585515.9, 4132894.0, 62.8, 62.8, 6.1); ( 585525.9, 4132894.0, 62.6, 62.6, 6.1); ( 585546.0, 4132894.0, 62.2, 62.2, 6.1); ( 585556.0, 4132894.0, 62.1, 62.1, 6.1); ( 585566.1, 4132894.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585576.1, 4132894.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585636.3, 4132894.0, 61.2, 61.2, 6.1); ( 585646.4, 4132894.0, 61.1, 61.1, 6.1); ( 585656.4, 4132894.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585676.5, 4132894.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585686.5, 4132894.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585696.6, 4132894.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585515.9, 4132904.0, 62.6, 62.6, 6.1); ( 585525.9, 4132904.0, 62.3, 62.3, 6.1); ( 585546.0, 4132904.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585556.0, 4132904.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585566.1, 4132904.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585576.1, 4132904.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585586.1, 4132904.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585596.2, 4132904.0, 61.9, 61.9, 6.1); ( 585606.2, 4132904.0, 61.6, 61.6, 6.1); ( 585616.2, 4132904.0, 61.3, 61.3, 6.1); ( 585626.3, 4132904.0, 61.1, 61.1, 6.1); ( 585636.3, 4132904.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585646.4, 4132904.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585656.4, 4132904.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585676.5, 4132904.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585686.5, 4132904.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585696.6, 4132904.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585515.9, 4132914.0, 62.4, 62.4, 6.1); ( 585525.9, 4132914.0, 62.2, 62.2, 6.1); ( 585546.0, 4132914.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585556.0, 4132914.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585566.1, 4132914.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585576.1, 4132914.0, 61.9, 61.9, 6.1); ( 585586.1, 4132914.0, 61.8, 61.8, 6.1); ( 585596.2, 4132914.0, 61.7, 61.7, 6.1); ( 585606.2, 4132914.0, 61.4, 61.4, 6.1); ( 585616.2, 4132914.0, 61.2, 61.2, 6.1); ( 585626.3, 4132914.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585636.3, 4132914.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585646.4, 4132914.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585656.4, 4132914.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585676.5, 4132914.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585686.5, 4132914.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585696.6, 4132914.0, 60.9, 60.9, 6.1); ( 585515.9, 4132924.0, 62.2, 62.2, 6.1); ( 585525.9, 4132924.0, 62.1, 62.1, 6.1); ( 585546.0, 4132924.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585556.0, 4132924.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585566.1, 4132924.0, 61.9, 61.9, 6.1); ( 585576.1, 4132924.0, 61.8, 61.8, 6.1); ( 585586.1, 4132924.0, 61.6, 61.6, 6.1); ( 585596.2, 4132924.0, 61.4, 61.4, 6.1); ( 585606.2, 4132924.0, 61.2, 61.2, 6.1); ( 585616.2, 4132924.0, 61.1, 61.1, 6.1); ( 585626.3, 4132924.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585636.3, 4132924.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585646.4, 4132924.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585656.4, 4132924.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585676.5, 4132924.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585686.5, 4132924.0, 60.9, 60.9, 6.1); ( 585696.6, 4132924.0, 60.7, 60.7, 6.1); ( 585515.9, 4132934.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585525.9, 4132934.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585515.9, 4132944.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585525.9, 4132944.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585546.0, 4132944.0, 61.9, 61.9, 6.1); ( 585556.0, 4132944.0, 61.8, 61.8, 6.1); ( 585566.1, 4132944.0, 61.7, 61.7, 6.1); ( 585576.1, 4132944.0, 61.4, 61.4, 6.1); ( 585586.1, 4132944.0, 61.2, 61.2, 6.1); ( 585596.2, 4132944.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585606.2, 4132944.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585616.2, 4132944.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585626.3, 4132944.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585636.3, 4132944.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585646.4, 4132944.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585656.4, 4132944.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585666.5, 4132944.0, 60.9, 60.9, 6.1); ( 585676.5, 4132944.0, 60.8, 60.8, 6.1); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) ( 585686.5, 4132944.0, 60.7, 60.7, 6.1); ( 585696.6, 4132944.0, 60.4, 60.4, 6.1); ( 585515.9, 4132954.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585525.9, 4132954.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585546.0, 4132954.0, 61.8, 61.8, 6.1); ( 585556.0, 4132954.0, 61.6, 61.6, 6.1); ( 585566.1, 4132954.0, 61.4, 61.4, 6.1); ( 585576.1, 4132954.0, 61.2, 61.2, 6.1); ( 585586.1, 4132954.0, 61.1, 61.1, 6.1); ( 585596.2, 4132954.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585606.2, 4132954.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585616.2, 4132954.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585626.3, 4132954.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585636.3, 4132954.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585646.4, 4132954.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585656.4, 4132954.0, 60.9, 60.9, 6.1); ( 585666.5, 4132954.0, 60.7, 60.7, 6.1); ( 585676.5, 4132954.0, 60.5, 60.5, 6.1); ( 585686.5, 4132954.0, 60.4, 60.4, 6.1); ( 585696.6, 4132954.0, 60.2, 60.2, 6.1); ( 585515.9, 4132964.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585525.9, 4132964.0, 62.0, 62.0, 6.1); ( 585546.0, 4132964.0, 61.6, 61.6, 6.1); ( 585556.0, 4132964.0, 61.3, 61.3, 6.1); ( 585566.1, 4132964.0, 61.1, 61.1, 6.1); ( 585576.1, 4132964.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585586.1, 4132964.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585596.2, 4132964.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585606.2, 4132964.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585616.2, 4132964.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585626.3, 4132964.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585636.3, 4132964.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585646.4, 4132964.0, 61.0, 61.0, 6.1); ( 585656.4, 4132964.0, 60.9, 60.9, 6.1); ( 585666.5, 4132964.0, 60.6, 60.6, 6.1); ( 585676.5, 4132964.0, 60.3, 60.3, 6.1); ( 585686.5, 4132964.0, 60.1, 60.1, 6.1); ( 585696.6, 4132964.0, 60.0, 60.0, 6.1); ( 585477.4, 4132909.9, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585465.3, 4132911.3, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585474.0, 4132894.5, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585462.4, 4132895.4, 63.1, 63.1, 0.0); ( 585474.0, 4132883.4, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585465.3, 4132882.4, 63.2, 63.2, 0.0); ( 585474.5, 4132867.5, 63.3, 63.3, 0.0); ( 585463.9, 4132865.5, 63.6, 63.6, 0.0); ( 585475.9, 4132856.4, 63.6, 63.6, 0.0); ( 585463.9, 4132855.4, 63.8, 63.8, 0.0); ( 585475.4, 4132845.3, 63.9, 63.9, 0.0); ( 585465.3, 4132844.3, 64.0, 64.0, 0.0); ( 585474.0, 4132834.2, 64.0, 64.0, 0.0); ( 585465.3, 4132835.2, 64.0, 64.0, 0.0); ( 585477.8, 4132824.1, 64.0, 64.0, 0.0); ( 585477.8, 4132814.9, 64.0, 64.0, 0.0); ( 585476.4, 4132801.0, 64.0, 64.0, 0.0); ( 585466.8, 4132799.0, 64.1, 64.1, 0.0); ( 585434.0, 4132796.2, 64.8, 64.8, 0.0); ( 585434.0, 4132785.6, 65.0, 65.0, 0.0); ( 585425.8, 4132786.0, 65.0, 65.0, 0.0); ( 585425.8, 4132797.1, 64.8, 64.8, 0.0); ( 585407.0, 4132800.5, 65.0, 65.0, 0.0); ( 585408.9, 4132787.0, 65.0, 65.0, 0.0); ( 585396.4, 4132788.4, 65.0, 65.0, 0.0); ( 585395.9, 4132800.5, 65.0, 65.0, 0.0); ( 585386.8, 4132800.0, 65.0, 65.0, 0.0); ( 585375.7, 4132800.0, 65.0, 65.0, 0.0); ( 585375.7, 4132788.4, 65.0, 65.0, 0.0); ( 585385.3, 4132789.4, 65.0, 65.0, 0.0); ( 585360.2, 4132797.1, 65.0, 65.0, 0.0); ( 585347.2, 4132795.7, 65.0, 65.0, 0.0); ( 585347.2, 4132785.1, 65.0, 65.0, 0.0); ( 585355.9, 4132786.5, 65.0, 65.0, 0.0); ( 585404.1, 4132821.7, 64.9, 64.9, 0.0); ( 585390.1, 4132823.6, 64.9, 64.9, 0.0); ( 585402.7, 4132836.6, 64.6, 64.6, 0.0); ( 585389.7, 4132837.6, 64.8, 64.8, 0.0); ( 585403.6, 4132845.8, 64.3, 64.3, 0.0); ( 585388.2, 4132846.3, 64.8, 64.8, 0.0); ( 585445.5, 4132894.5, 63.4, 63.4, 0.0); ( 585445.1, 4132906.0, 63.0, 63.0, 0.0); ( 585403.6, 4132858.8, 64.2, 64.2, 0.0); ( 585390.1, 4132858.8, 64.5, 64.5, 0.0); ( 585477.4, 4132909.9, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585465.3, 4132911.3, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585474.0, 4132894.5, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585462.4, 4132895.4, 63.1, 63.1, 6.1); ( 585474.0, 4132883.4, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585465.3, 4132882.4, 63.2, 63.2, 6.1); ( 585474.5, 4132867.5, 63.3, 63.3, 6.1); ( 585463.9, 4132865.5, 63.6, 63.6, 6.1); ( 585475.9, 4132856.4, 63.6, 63.6, 6.1); ( 585463.9, 4132855.4, 63.8, 63.8, 6.1); ( 585475.4, 4132845.3, 63.9, 63.9, 6.1); ( 585465.3, 4132844.3, 64.0, 64.0, 6.1); ( 585474.0, 4132834.2, 64.0, 64.0, 6.1); ( 585465.3, 4132835.2, 64.0, 64.0, 6.1); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 77 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** DISCRETE CARTESIAN RECEPTORS *** (X-COORD, Y-COORD, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG) (METERS) ( 585477.8, 4132824.1, 64.0, 64.0, 6.1); ( 585477.8, 4132814.9, 64.0, 64.0, 6.1); ( 585476.4, 4132801.0, 64.0, 64.0, 6.1); ( 585466.8, 4132799.0, 64.1, 64.1, 6.1); ( 585434.0, 4132796.2, 64.8, 64.8, 6.1); ( 585434.0, 4132785.6, 65.0, 65.0, 6.1); ( 585425.8, 4132786.0, 65.0, 65.0, 6.1); ( 585425.8, 4132797.1, 64.8, 64.8, 6.1); ( 585407.0, 4132800.5, 65.0, 65.0, 6.1); ( 585408.9, 4132787.0, 65.0, 65.0, 6.1); ( 585396.4, 4132788.4, 65.0, 65.0, 6.1); ( 585395.9, 4132800.5, 65.0, 65.0, 6.1); ( 585386.8, 4132800.0, 65.0, 65.0, 6.1); ( 585375.7, 4132800.0, 65.0, 65.0, 6.1); ( 585375.7, 4132788.4, 65.0, 65.0, 6.1); ( 585385.3, 4132789.4, 65.0, 65.0, 6.1); ( 585360.2, 4132797.1, 65.0, 65.0, 6.1); ( 585347.2, 4132795.7, 65.0, 65.0, 6.1); ( 585347.2, 4132785.1, 65.0, 65.0, 6.1); ( 585355.9, 4132786.5, 65.0, 65.0, 6.1); ( 585404.1, 4132821.7, 64.9, 64.9, 6.1); ( 585390.1, 4132823.6, 64.9, 64.9, 6.1); ( 585402.7, 4132836.6, 64.6, 64.6, 6.1); ( 585389.7, 4132837.6, 64.8, 64.8, 6.1); ( 585403.6, 4132845.8, 64.3, 64.3, 6.1); ( 585388.2, 4132846.3, 64.8, 64.8, 6.1); ( 585445.5, 4132894.5, 63.4, 63.4, 6.1); ( 585445.1, 4132906.0, 63.0, 63.0, 6.1); ( 585403.6, 4132858.8, 64.2, 64.2, 6.1); ( 585390.1, 4132858.8, 64.5, 64.5, 6.1); ( 585286.4, 4132625.0, 67.0, 67.0, 0.0); ( 585285.9, 4132612.2, 67.0, 67.0, 0.0); ( 585286.9, 4132600.5, 67.0, 67.0, 0.0); ( 585285.9, 4132583.8, 67.0, 67.0, 0.0); ( 585288.4, 4132562.1, 67.1, 67.1, 0.0); ( 585290.3, 4132541.0, 67.1, 67.1, 0.0); ( 585289.8, 4132519.9, 67.1, 67.1, 0.0); ( 585285.4, 4132504.1, 67.6, 67.6, 0.0); ( 585287.4, 4132490.9, 67.9, 67.9, 0.0); ( 585285.9, 4132477.6, 68.0, 68.0, 0.0); ( 585286.4, 4132625.0, 67.0, 67.0, 6.1); ( 585285.9, 4132612.2, 67.0, 67.0, 6.1); ( 585286.9, 4132600.5, 67.0, 67.0, 6.1); ( 585285.9, 4132583.8, 67.0, 67.0, 6.1); ( 585288.4, 4132562.1, 67.1, 67.1, 6.1); ( 585290.3, 4132541.0, 67.1, 67.1, 6.1); ( 585289.8, 4132519.9, 67.1, 67.1, 6.1); ( 585285.4, 4132504.1, 67.6, 67.6, 6.1); ( 585287.4, 4132490.9, 67.9, 67.9, 6.1); ( 585285.9, 4132477.6, 68.0, 68.0, 6.1); ( 585529.2, 4132495.8, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585528.2, 4132508.6, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585529.6, 4132520.8, 65.9, 65.9, 6.1); ( 585526.7, 4132536.1, 65.5, 65.5, 6.1); ( 585516.9, 4132536.1, 65.7, 65.7, 6.1); ( 585507.0, 4132536.6, 65.9, 65.9, 6.1); ( 585487.4, 4132539.0, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585487.9, 4132528.2, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585486.9, 4132517.9, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585509.0, 4132494.3, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585496.2, 4132493.8, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585485.9, 4132493.3, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585470.7, 4132493.3, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585458.4, 4132493.8, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585446.6, 4132492.8, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585464.3, 4132537.6, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585462.8, 4132529.7, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585464.3, 4132518.4, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585444.6, 4132534.6, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585432.3, 4132535.6, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585422.0, 4132536.1, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585427.4, 4132514.0, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585427.9, 4132501.7, 66.2, 66.2, 6.1); ( 585426.9, 4132490.4, 66.5, 66.5, 6.1); ( 585407.3, 4132535.1, 66.1, 66.1, 6.1); ( 585394.0, 4132534.6, 66.2, 66.2, 6.1); ( 585381.7, 4132535.1, 66.4, 66.4, 6.1); ( 585404.8, 4132511.5, 66.4, 66.4, 6.1); ( 585405.8, 4132500.2, 66.7, 66.7, 6.1); ( 585404.8, 4132488.4, 67.0, 67.0, 6.1); ( 585386.2, 4132484.5, 67.0, 67.0, 6.1); ( 585374.9, 4132484.5, 67.0, 67.0, 6.1); ( 585360.1, 4132484.0, 67.0, 67.0, 6.1); ( 585359.1, 4132507.1, 67.0, 67.0, 6.1); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) ( 585359.6, 4132518.4, 67.0, 67.0, 6.1); ( 585361.1, 4132526.8, 66.9, 66.9, 6.1); ( 585529.2, 4132495.8, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585528.2, 4132508.6, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585529.6, 4132520.8, 65.9, 65.9, 9.1); ( 585526.7, 4132536.1, 65.5, 65.5, 9.1); ( 585516.9, 4132536.1, 65.7, 65.7, 9.1); ( 585507.0, 4132536.6, 65.9, 65.9, 9.1); ( 585487.4, 4132539.0, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585487.9, 4132528.2, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585486.9, 4132517.9, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585509.0, 4132494.3, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585496.2, 4132493.8, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585485.9, 4132493.3, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585470.7, 4132493.3, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585458.4, 4132493.8, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585446.6, 4132492.8, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585464.3, 4132537.6, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585462.8, 4132529.7, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585464.3, 4132518.4, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585444.6, 4132534.6, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585432.3, 4132535.6, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585422.0, 4132536.1, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585427.4, 4132514.0, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585427.9, 4132501.7, 66.2, 66.2, 9.1); ( 585426.9, 4132490.4, 66.5, 66.5, 9.1); ( 585407.3, 4132535.1, 66.1, 66.1, 9.1); ( 585394.0, 4132534.6, 66.2, 66.2, 9.1); ( 585381.7, 4132535.1, 66.4, 66.4, 9.1); ( 585404.8, 4132511.5, 66.4, 66.4, 9.1); ( 585405.8, 4132500.2, 66.7, 66.7, 9.1); ( 585404.8, 4132488.4, 67.0, 67.0, 9.1); ( 585386.2, 4132484.5, 67.0, 67.0, 9.1); ( 585374.9, 4132484.5, 67.0, 67.0, 9.1); ( 585360.1, 4132484.0, 67.0, 67.0, 9.1); ( 585359.1, 4132507.1, 67.0, 67.0, 9.1); ( 585359.6, 4132518.4, 67.0, 67.0, 9.1); ( 585361.1, 4132526.8, 66.9, 66.9, 9.1); ( 585677.6, 4132278.1, 66.2, 66.2, 0.0); ( 585676.6, 4132299.7, 66.0, 66.0, 0.0); ( 585666.8, 4132302.2, 66.1, 66.1, 0.0); ( 585656.9, 4132305.6, 66.0, 66.0, 0.0); ( 585643.2, 4132309.5, 66.3, 66.3, 0.0); ( 585633.8, 4132310.0, 66.6, 66.6, 0.0); ( 585624.0, 4132313.5, 66.8, 66.8, 0.0); ( 585613.7, 4132316.9, 66.8, 66.8, 0.0); ( 585610.2, 4132305.1, 67.0, 67.0, 0.0); ( 585611.7, 4132294.8, 67.0, 67.0, 0.0); ( 585611.2, 4132278.1, 67.0, 67.0, 0.0); ( 585626.9, 4132278.1, 67.0, 67.0, 0.0); ( 585624.5, 4132301.2, 67.0, 67.0, 0.0); ( 585634.8, 4132297.3, 66.7, 66.7, 0.0); ( 585648.6, 4132294.8, 66.5, 66.5, 0.0); ( 585659.4, 4132291.8, 66.4, 66.4, 0.0); ( 585667.7, 4132278.6, 66.5, 66.5, 0.0); ( 585677.6, 4132278.1, 66.2, 66.2, 6.1); ( 585676.6, 4132299.7, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585666.8, 4132302.2, 66.1, 66.1, 6.1); ( 585656.9, 4132305.6, 66.0, 66.0, 6.1); ( 585643.2, 4132309.5, 66.3, 66.3, 6.1); ( 585633.8, 4132310.0, 66.6, 66.6, 6.1); ( 585624.0, 4132313.5, 66.8, 66.8, 6.1); ( 585613.7, 4132316.9, 66.8, 66.8, 6.1); ( 585610.2, 4132305.1, 67.0, 67.0, 6.1); ( 585611.7, 4132294.8, 67.0, 67.0, 6.1); ( 585611.2, 4132278.1, 67.0, 67.0, 6.1); ( 585626.9, 4132278.1, 67.0, 67.0, 6.1); ( 585624.5, 4132301.2, 67.0, 67.0, 6.1); ( 585634.8, 4132297.3, 66.7, 66.7, 6.1); ( 585648.6, 4132294.8, 66.5, 66.5, 6.1); ( 585659.4, 4132291.8, 66.4, 66.4, 6.1); ( 585667.7, 4132278.6, 66.5, 66.5, 6.1); ( 585677.6, 4132278.1, 66.2, 66.2, 9.1); ( 585676.6, 4132299.7, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585666.8, 4132302.2, 66.1, 66.1, 9.1); ( 585656.9, 4132305.6, 66.0, 66.0, 9.1); ( 585643.2, 4132309.5, 66.3, 66.3, 9.1); ( 585633.8, 4132310.0, 66.6, 66.6, 9.1); ( 585624.0, 4132313.5, 66.8, 66.8, 9.1); ( 585613.7, 4132316.9, 66.8, 66.8, 9.1); ( 585610.2, 4132305.1, 67.0, 67.0, 9.1); ( 585611.7, 4132294.8, 67.0, 67.0, 9.1); ( 585611.2, 4132278.1, 67.0, 67.0, 9.1); ( 585626.9, 4132278.1, 67.0, 67.0, 9.1); ( 585624.5, 4132301.2, 67.0, 67.0, 9.1); ( 585634.8, 4132297.3, 66.7, 66.7, 9.1); ( 585648.6, 4132294.8, 66.5, 66.5, 9.1); ( 585659.4, 4132291.8, 66.4, 66.4, 9.1); ( 585667.7, 4132278.6, 66.5, 66.5, 9.1); Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 79 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** METEOROLOGICAL DAYS SELECTED FOR PROCESSING *** (1=YES; 0=NO) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NOTE: METEOROLOGICAL DATA ACTUALLY PROCESSED WILL ALSO DEPEND ON WHAT IS INCLUDED IN THE DATA FILE. *** UPPER BOUND OF FIRST THROUGH FIFTH WIND SPEED CATEGORIES *** (METERS/SEC) 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80, Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 80 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** UP TO THE FIRST 24 HOURS OF METEOROLOGICAL DATA *** Surface file: ..\Met Data\724945_NY Mineta Sn Jo Airport_15.5M\724945.SFC Met Version: 14134 Profile file: ..\Met Data\724945_NY Mineta Sn Jo Airport_15.5M\724945.PFL Surface format: FREE Profile format: FREE Surface station no.: 23293 Upper air station no.: 23230 Name: UNKNOWN Name: OAKLAND/WSO_AP Year: 2009 Year: 2009 First 24 hours of scalar data YR MO DY JDY HR H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-O LEN Z0 BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS WD HT REF TA HT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 09 01 01 1 01 -999.0 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -999. -999. -99999.0 0.25 1.10 1.00 0.00 0. 10.0 282.5 2.0 09 01 01 1 02 -13.4 0.236 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 275. 89.0 0.32 1.10 1.00 2.36 18. 10.0 282.5 2.0 09 01 01 1 03 -7.9 0.139 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 128. 30.9 0.32 1.10 1.00 1.76 4. 10.0 282.0 2.0 09 01 01 1 04 -12.4 0.217 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 242. 74.8 0.25 1.10 1.00 2.36 73. 10.0 281.4 2.0 09 01 01 1 05 -999.0 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -999. -999. -99999.0 0.25 1.10 1.00 0.00 0. 10.0 282.0 2.0 09 01 01 1 06 -9.7 0.170 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 168. 46.1 0.47 1.10 1.00 1.76 342. 10.0 281.4 2.0 09 01 01 1 07 -13.5 0.236 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 275. 88.6 0.32 1.10 1.00 2.36 5. 10.0 281.4 2.0 09 01 01 1 08 -19.7 0.345 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 486. 189.6 0.47 1.10 0.74 2.86 333. 10.0 280.9 2.0 09 01 01 1 09 -8.3 0.363 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 526. 525.4 0.47 1.10 0.39 2.86 327. 10.0 280.9 2.0 09 01 01 1 10 8.1 0.382 0.288 0.014 106. 566. -625.1 0.47 1.10 0.27 2.86 351. 10.0 280.9 2.0 09 01 01 1 11 17.6 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 189. -999. -99999.0 0.25 1.10 0.23 0.00 0. 10.0 280.9 2.0 09 01 01 1 12 23.0 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 259. -999. -99999.0 0.25 1.10 0.21 0.00 0. 10.0 281.4 2.0 09 01 01 1 13 23.9 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 315. -999. -99999.0 0.25 1.10 0.21 0.00 0. 10.0 281.4 2.0 09 01 01 1 14 48.5 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 407. -999. -99999.0 0.25 1.10 0.22 0.00 0. 10.0 283.1 2.0 09 01 01 1 15 69.5 0.319 0.953 0.016 453. 433. -42.6 0.32 1.10 0.25 2.36 32. 10.0 283.1 2.0 09 01 01 1 16 24.5 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 460. -999. -99999.0 0.25 1.10 0.33 0.00 0. 10.0 283.1 2.0 09 01 01 1 17 -999.0 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -999. -999. -99999.0 0.25 1.10 0.57 0.00 0. 10.0 283.1 2.0 09 01 01 1 18 -999.0 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -999. -999. -99999.0 0.25 1.10 1.00 0.00 0. 10.0 282.5 2.0 09 01 01 1 19 -24.2 0.212 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 235. 35.9 0.47 1.10 1.00 2.36 324. 10.0 281.4 2.0 09 01 01 1 20 -999.0 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -999. -999. -99999.0 0.25 1.10 1.00 0.00 0. 10.0 281.4 2.0 09 01 01 1 21 -999.0 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -999. -999. -99999.0 0.25 1.10 1.00 0.00 0. 10.0 280.9 2.0 09 01 01 1 22 -999.0 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -999. -999. -99999.0 0.25 1.10 1.00 0.00 0. 10.0 280.9 2.0 09 01 01 1 23 -999.0 -9.000 -9.000 -9.000 -999. -999. -99999.0 0.25 1.10 1.00 0.00 0. 10.0 280.4 2.0 09 01 01 1 24 -9.7 0.170 -9.000 -9.000 -999. 168. 45.7 0.47 1.10 1.00 1.76 310. 10.0 280.4 2.0 First hour of profile data YR MO DY HR HEIGHT F WDIR WSPD AMB_TMP sigmaA sigmaW sigmaV 09 01 01 01 10.0 1 -999. -99.00 282.6 99.0 -99.00 -99.00 F indicates top of profile (=1) or below (=0) Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 127 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** THE SUMMARY OF MAXIMUM PERIOD ( 43872 HRS) RESULTS *** ** CONC OF OTHER IN MICROGRAMS/M**3 ** NETWORK GROUP ID AVERAGE CONC RECEPTOR (XR, YR, ZELEV, ZHILL, ZFLAG) OF TYPE GRID-ID - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PAREA1 1ST HIGHEST VALUE IS 25.51163 AT ( 585747.79, 4132572.51, 63.86, 63.86, 0.00) DC 2ND HIGHEST VALUE IS 24.88546 AT ( 585747.79, 4132587.24, 63.54, 63.54, 0.00) DC 3RD HIGHEST VALUE IS 23.66983 AT ( 585747.79, 4132557.78, 63.94, 63.94, 0.00) DC 4TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 21.20567 AT ( 585747.79, 4132572.51, 63.86, 63.86, 6.10) DC 5TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 20.75607 AT ( 585747.79, 4132557.78, 63.94, 63.94, 6.10) DC 6TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 20.17996 AT ( 585747.79, 4132587.24, 63.54, 63.54, 6.10) DC 7TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 19.74654 AT ( 585760.51, 4132572.51, 63.50, 63.50, 0.00) DC 8TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 18.95881 AT ( 585760.51, 4132587.24, 63.27, 63.27, 0.00) DC 9TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 18.88447 AT ( 585760.51, 4132557.78, 63.78, 63.78, 0.00) DC 10TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 18.60802 AT ( 585747.79, 4132616.70, 63.00, 63.00, 0.00) DC SLINE1 1ST HIGHEST VALUE IS 9.02163 AT ( 585747.79, 4132557.78, 63.94, 63.94, 0.00) DC 2ND HIGHEST VALUE IS 8.81978 AT ( 585747.79, 4132572.51, 63.86, 63.86, 0.00) DC 3RD HIGHEST VALUE IS 8.43988 AT ( 585747.79, 4132587.24, 63.54, 63.54, 0.00) DC 4TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 7.16100 AT ( 585760.51, 4132513.59, 64.00, 64.00, 0.00) DC 5TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 7.11537 AT ( 585760.51, 4132528.32, 64.00, 64.00, 0.00) DC 6TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 7.03946 AT ( 585747.79, 4132557.78, 63.94, 63.94, 6.10) DC 7TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 6.88984 AT ( 585747.79, 4132616.70, 63.00, 63.00, 0.00) DC 8TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 6.88666 AT ( 585760.51, 4132557.78, 63.78, 63.78, 0.00) DC 9TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 6.85972 AT ( 585747.79, 4132572.51, 63.86, 63.86, 6.10) DC 10TH HIGHEST VALUE IS 6.64804 AT ( 585760.51, 4132572.51, 63.50, 63.50, 0.00) DC *** RECEPTOR TYPES: GC = GRIDCART GP = GRIDPOLR DC = DISCCART DP = DISCPOLR Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) *** AERMOD - VERSION 18081 *** *** Construction HRA *** 01/04/19 *** AERMET - VERSION 14134 *** *** De Anza Hotel *** 13:16:26 PAGE 128 *** MODELOPTs: RegDFAULT CONC ELEV FLGPOL URBAN *** Message Summary : AERMOD Model Execution *** --------- Summary of Total Messages -------- A Total of 0 Fatal Error Message(s) A Total of 0 Warning Message(s) A Total of 13130 Informational Message(s) A Total of 43872 Hours Were Processed A Total of 11611 Calm Hours Identified A Total of 1519 Missing Hours Identified ( 3.46 Percent) ******** FATAL ERROR MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ************************************ *** AERMOD Finishes Successfully *** ************************************ Model Output Unit Emission Rates (1 g/s) Health Risk Assessment Background and Modeling Data Appendix C. Construction Risk Calculations Health Risk Assessment Background and Modeling Data This page intentionally left blank. Table C1 Residential MER Concentrations for Risk Calculations 1 of 2 Contaminant Model Emission Rates 2 MER Total MER Conc. Output 1 Conc.Annual Average (µg/m3)(g/s)(µg/m3)(µg/m3) ( a )( c )( d )( e )( f ) Residential Receptors - Unmitigated DPM 2020 On-Site Emissions 25.51 7.77E-03 1.98E-01 1.98E-01 Truck Route 9.02 2.30E-05 2.08E-04 2021 On-Site Emissions 25.51 7.05E-03 1.80E-01 1.80E-01 Truck Route 9.02 3.29E-06 2.97E-05 2022 On-Site Emissions 25.51 3.98E-03 1.02E-01 1.02E-01 Truck Route 9.02 1.42E-06 1.28E-05 Total DPM concentrations used for Cancer Risk and Chronic Hazard calculations PM2.5 2020 On-Site Emissions 25.51 7.25E-03 1.85E-01 1.85E-01 Truck Route 9.02 2.20E-05 1.98E-04 2021 On-Site Emissions 25.51 6.48E-03 1.65E-01 1.65E-01 Truck Route 9.02 3.11E-06 2.80E-05 2022 On-Site Emissions 25.51 3.71E-03 9.47E-02 9.47E-02 Truck Route 9.02 1.33E-06 1.20E-05 Maximum Annual PM2.5 Concentration 0.19 Residential Receptors - Mitigated Run: Level 3 DPFs for eq. > 50 HP DPM 2020 On-Site Emissions 25.51 1.17E-03 2.98E-02 3.00E-02 Truck Route 9.02 2.30E-05 2.08E-04 2021 On-Site Emissions 25.51 1.06E-03 2.70E-02 2.70E-02 Truck Route 9.02 3.29E-06 2.97E-05 2022 On-Site Emissions 25.51 6.99E-04 1.78E-02 1.78E-02 Truck Route 9.02 1.42E-06 1.28E-05 Total DPM concentrations used for Cancer Risk and Chronic Hazard calculations PM2.5 2020 On-Site Emissions 25.51 1.09E-03 2.77E-02 2.79E-02 Truck Route 9.02 2.20E-05 1.98E-04 2021 On-Site Emissions 25.51 9.73E-04 2.48E-02 2.48E-02 Truck Route 9.02 3.11E-06 2.80E-05 2022 On-Site Emissions 25.51 6.59E-04 1.68E-02 1.68E-02 Truck Route 9.02 1.33E-06 1.20E-05 Maximum Annual PM2.5 Concentration 0.03 Maximum Exposed Receptor (MER) UTM coordinates: 585747.79E, 4132572.51N 1 Model Output at the MER based on unit emission rates for sources (1 g/s). 2 Emission Rates from Emission Rate Calculations (Appendix A - Construction Emissions). Source ( b ) Table C2 Quantification of Health Risks for Off-site Residents 2 of 2 MER Weight Contaminant Conc.Fraction URF CPF 3rd Trimester 0 < 2 years 3rd Trimester 0 < 2 years Chronic REL RESP (µg/m3)(µg/m3)-1 (mg/kg/day)-1 (mg/kg-day)(mg/kg-day)per million per million per million (µg/m3) ( b )( c )( d )( e )( f )( g )( h )( k )( l)( o )( p )( q ) Residential Receptors - Unmitigated 2020 On & Off-Site 1.98E-01 1.00E+00 DPM 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 6.87E-05 2.07E-04 2.19 4.39 6.58 5.0E+00 3.97E-02 2021 On & Off-Site 1.80E-01 1.00E+00 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 1.88E-04 24.0 24.0 5.0E+00 3.60E-02 2022 On & Off-Site 1.02E-01 1.00E+00 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 1.06E-04 2.86 2.86 5.0E+00 2.03E-02 33.4 0.10 Residential Receptors - Mitigated Run: Level 3 DPFs for eq. > 50 HP 2020 On & Off-Site 3.00E-02 1.00E+00 DPM 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 1.04E-05 3.13E-05 0.33 0.66 0.99 5.0E+00 6.00E-03 2021 On & Off-Site 2.70E-02 1.00E+00 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 2.82E-05 3.60 3.60 5.0E+00 5.40E-03 2022 On & Off-Site 1.78E-02 1.00E+00 3.0E-04 1.1E+00 1.86E-05 0.50 0.50 5.0E+00 3.57E-03 5.1 0.015 Maximum Exposed Receptor (MER) UTM coordinates: 585747.79E, 4132572.51N OEHHA age bin 3rd Trimester 0 < 2 years exposure year(s)2020 2020-2022 Dose Exposure Factors:xposure frequency (days/year)350 350 inhalation rate (L/kg-day) 1 361 1090 inhalation absorption factor 1 1 conversion factor (mg/µg; m3/L)1.0E-06 1.0E-06 Risk Calculation Factors:age sensitivity factor 10 10 averaging time (years)70 70 per million 1.0E+06 1.0E+06 fraction of time at home 0.85 0.85 exposure durations per age bin Construction Year Risk Scalar 2 3rd Trimester 0 < 2 years 2019 0.42 0.25 0.17 2020 1.00 1.00 2021 0.21 0.21 Total 1.63 0.25 1.38 1 Inhalation rate taken as the 95th percentile breathing rates (OEHHA, 2015). 2 Risk scalar determined for each year of construction to adjust receptor exposures to the exposure durations for each construction year (see App A - Construction Emissions). 3 Chronic Hazards for DPM using the chronic reference exposure level (REL) for the Respiratory Toxicological Endpoint. Chronic Hazards 3Total Cancer Risk ( a ) Source Dose (by age bin)Carcinogenic Risks (by age bin) exposure durations (year) ........................................................................................................................ APPENDIX C: NOISE DATA ........................................................................................................................ Noise and Vibration Background NOISE BACKGROUND Noise is most often defined as unwanted sound; whether it is loud, unpleasant, unexpected, or otherwise undesirable. Although sound can be easily measured, the perception of noise and the physical response to sound complicate the analysis of its impact on people. People judge the relative magnitude of sound sensation in subjective terms such as “noisiness” or “loudness.” Noise Descriptors The following are brief definitions of terminology used in this chapter:  Sound. A disturbance created by a vibrating object, which, when transmitted by pressure waves through a medium such as air, is capable of being detected by a receiving mechanism, such as the human ear or a microphone.  Noise. Sound that is loud, unpleasant, unexpected, or otherwise undesirable.  Decibel (dB). A unitless measure of sound, expressed on a logarithmic scale and with respect to a defined reference sound pressure. The standard reference pressure is 20 micropascals (20 µPa).  Vibration Decibel (VdB). A unitless measure of vibration, expressed on a logarithmic scale and with respect to a defined reference vibration velocity. In the U.S., the standard reference velocity is 1 micro- inch per second (1x10-6 in/sec).  A-Weighted Decibel (dBA). An overall frequency-weighted sound level in decibels that approximates the frequency response of the human ear.  Equivalent Continuous Noise Level (Leq); also called the Energy-Equivalent Noise Level. The value of an equivalent, steady sound level which, in a stated time period (often over an hour) and at a stated location, has the same A-weighted sound energy as the time-varying sound. Thus, the Leq metric is a single numerical value that represents the equivalent amount of variable sound energy received by a receptor over the specified duration.  Statistical Sound Level (Ln). The sound level that is exceeded “n” percent of time during a given sample period. For example, the L50 level is the statistical indicator of the time-varying noise signal that is exceeded 50 percent of the time (during each sampling period); that is, half of the sampling time, the changing noise levels are above this value and half of the time they are below it. This is called the “median sound level.” The L10 level, likewise, is the value that is exceeded 10 percent of the time (i.e., near the maximum) and this is often known as the “intrusive sound level.” The L90 is the sound level F UNDAMEN T AL S OF N O ISE exceeded 90 percent of the time and is often considered the “effective background level” or “residual noise level.”  Day-Night Sound Level (Ldn or DNL). The energy-average of the A-weighted sound levels occurring during a 24-hour period, with 10 dB added to the sound levels occurring during the period from 10:00 PM to 7:00 AM.  Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). The energy average of the A-weighted sound levels occurring during a 24-hour period, with 5 dB added from 7:00 PM to 10:00 PM and 10 dB from 10:00 PM to 7:00 AM. NOTE: For general community/environmental noise, CNEL and Ldn values rarely differ by more than 1 dB (with the CNEL being only slightly more restrictive – that is, higher than the Ldn value). As a matter of practice, Ldn and CNEL values are interchangeable and are treated as equivalent in this assessment.  Sensitive Receptor. Noise- and vibration-sensitive receptors include land uses where quiet environments are necessary for enjoyment and public health and safety. Residences, schools, motels and hotels, libraries, religious institutions, hospitals, and nursing homes are examples. Characteristics of Sound When an object vibrates, it radiates part of its energy in the form of a pressure wave. Sound is that pressure wave transmitted through the air. Technically, airborne sound is a rapid fluctuation or oscillation of air pressure above and below atmospheric pressure that creates sound waves. Sound can be described in terms of amplitude (loudness), frequency (pitch), or duration (time). Loudness or amplitude is measured in dB, frequency or pitch is measured in Hertz [Hz] or cycles per second, and duration or time variations is measured in seconds or minutes. Amplitude Unlike linear units such as inches or pounds, decibels are measured on a logarithmic scale. Because of the physical characteristics of noise transmission and perception, the relative loudness of sound does not closely match the actual amounts of sound energy. Table 1 presents the subjective effect of changes in sound pressure levels. Ambient sounds generally range from 30 dBA (very quiet) to 100 dBA (very loud). Changes of 1 to 3 dB are detectable under quiet, controlled conditions, and changes of less than 1 dB are usually not discernible (even under ideal conditions). A 3 dB change in noise levels is considered the minimum change that is detectable with human hearing in outside environments. A change of 5 dB is readily discernible to most people in an exterior environment, and a 10 dB change is perceived as a doubling (or halving) of the sound. Table 1 Noise Perceptibility ± 3 dB Threshold of human perceptibility ± 5 dB Clearly noticeable change in noise level ± 10 dB Half or twice as loud ± 20 dB Much quieter or louder Source: Bies, David A. and Colin H. Hansen. 2009. Engineering Noise Control: Theory and Practice. 4th ed. New York: Spon Press. Frequency The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies. Sound waves below 16 Hz are not heard at all, but are “felt” more as a vibration. Similarly, though people with extremely sensitive hearing can hear sounds as high as 20,000 Hz, most people cannot hear above 15,000 Hz. In all cases, hearing acuity falls off rapidly above about 10,000 Hz and below about 200 Hz. When describing sound and its effect on a human population, A-weighted (dBA) sound levels are typically used to approximate the response of the human ear. The A-weighted noise level has been found to correlate well with people’s judgments of the “noisiness” of different sounds and has been used for many years as a measure of community and industrial noise. Although the A-weighted scale and the energy-equivalent metric are commonly used to quantify the range of human response to individual events or general community sound levels, the degree of annoyance or other response also depends on several other perceptibility factors, including:  Ambient (background) sound level  General nature of the existing conditions (e.g., quiet rural or busy urban)  Difference between the magnitude of the sound event level and the ambient condition  Duration of the sound event  Number of event occurrences and their repetitiveness  Time of day that the event occurs Duration Time variation in noise exposure is typically expressed in terms of a steady-state energy level equal to the energy content of the time varying period (called Leq), or alternately, as a statistical description of the sound level that is exceeded over some fraction of a given observation period. For example, the L50 noise level represents the noise level that is exceeded 50 percent of the time; half the time the noise level exceeds this level and half the time the noise level is less than this level. This level is also representative of the level that is exceeded 30 minutes in an hour. Similarly, the L2, L8 and L25 values represent the noise levels that are exceeded 2, 8, and 25 percent of the time or 1, 5, and 15 minutes per hour, respectively. These “n” values are typically used to demonstrate compliance for stationary noise sources with many cities’ noise ordinances. Other values typically noted during a noise survey are the Lmin and Lmax. These values represent the minimum and maximum root-mean-square noise levels obtained over the measurement period, respectively. Because community receptors are more sensitive to unwanted noise intrusion during the evening and at night, state law and many local jurisdictions use an adjusted 24-hour noise descriptor called the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) or Day-Night Noise Level (Ldn). The CNEL descriptor requires that an artificial increment (or “penalty”) of 5 dBA be added to the actual noise level for the hours from 7:00 PM to 10:00 PM and 10 dBA for the hours from 10:00 PM to 7:00 AM. The Ldn descriptor uses the same methodology Change in dB Noise Level F UNDAMEN T AL S OF N O ISE except that there is no artificial increment added to the hours between 7:00 PM and 10:00 PM. Both descriptors give roughly the same 24-hour level, with the CNEL being only slightly more restrictive (i.e., higher). The CNEL or Ldn metrics are commonly applied to the assessment of roadway and airport-related noise sources. Sound Propagation Sound dissipates exponentially with distance from the noise source. This phenomenon is known as “spreading loss.” For a single-point source, sound levels decrease by approximately 6 dB for each doubling of distance from the source (conservatively neglecting ground attenuation effects, air absorption factors, and barrier shielding). For example, if a backhoe at 50 feet generates 84 dBA, at 100 feet the noise level would be 79 dBA, and at 200 feet it would be 73 dBA. This drop-off rate is appropriate for noise generated by on-site operations from stationary equipment or activity at a project site. If noise is produced by a line source, such as highway traffic, the sound decreases by 3 dB for each doubling of distance over a reflective (“hard site”) surface such as concrete or asphalt. Line source noise in a relatively flat environment with ground-level absorptive vegetation decreases by an additional 1.5 dB for each doubling of distance. Psychological and Physiological Effects of Noise Physical damage to human hearing begins at prolonged exposure to noise levels higher than 85 dBA. Exposure to high noise levels affects the entire system, with prolonged noise exposure in excess of 75 dBA increasing body tensions, thereby affecting blood pressure and functions of the heart and the nervous system. Extended periods of noise exposure above 90 dBA results in permanent cell damage, which is the main driver for employee hearing protection regulations in the workplace. For community environments, the ambient or background noise problem is widespread, through generally worse in urban areas than in outlying, less- developed areas. Elevated ambient noise levels can result in noise interference (e.g., speech interruption/masking, sleep disturbance, disturbance of concentration) and cause annoyance. Since most people do not routinely work with decibels or A-weighted sound levels, it is often difficult to appreciate what a given sound pressure level number means. To help relate noise level values to common experience, Table 2 shows typical noise levels from familiar sources. NOISE BACK G ROUND AND M O DELING DA T A Table 2 Typical Noise Levels Common Outdoor Activities Noise Level (dBA) Common Indoor Activities Onset of physical discomfort 120+ 110 Rock Band (near amplification system) Jet Flyover at 1,000 feet 100 Gas Lawn Mower at three feet 90 Diesel Truck at 50 feet, at 50 mph Food Blender at 3 feet 80 Garbage Disposal at 3 feet Noisy Urban Area, Daytime 70 Vacuum Cleaner at 10 feet Commercial Area Normal speech at 3 feet Heavy Traffic at 300 feet 60 Large Business Office Quiet Urban Daytime 50 Dishwasher Next Room Quiet Urban Nighttime 40 Theater, Large Conference Room (background) Quiet Suburban Nighttime 30 Library Quiet Rural Nighttime Bedroom at Night, Concert Hall (background) 20 Broadcast/Recording Studio 10 Lowest Threshold of Human Hearing 0 Lowest Threshold of Human Hearing Source: California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2009, November. Technical Noise Supplement (“TeNS”). Prepared by ICF International. Vibration Fundamentals Vibration is an oscillatory motion through a solid medium in which the motion’s amplitude can be described in terms of displacement, velocity, or acceleration. Vibration is normally associated with activities stemming from operations of railroads or vibration-intensive stationary sources, but can also be associated with construction equipment such as jackhammers, pile drivers, and hydraulic hammers. As with noise, vibration can be described by both its amplitude and frequency. Vibration displacement is the distance that a point on a surface moves away from its original static position; velocity is the instantaneous speed that a point on a surface moves; and acceleration is the rate of change of the speed. Each of these descriptors can be used to correlate vibration to human response, building damage, and acceptable equipment vibration levels. During construction, the operation of construction equipment can cause groundborne vibration. During the operational phase of a project, receptors may be subject to levels of vibration that can cause annoyance due to noise generated from vibration of a structure or items within a structure. Vibration amplitudes are usually described in terms of either the peak particle velocity (PPV) or the root mean square (RMS) velocity. PPV is the maximum instantaneous peak of the vibration signal and RMS is the F UNDAMEN T AL S OF N O ISE square root of the average of the squared amplitude of the signal. PPV is more appropriate for evaluating potential building damage and RMS is typically more suitable for evaluating human response. As with airborne sound, annoyance with vibrational energy is a subjective measure, depending on the level of activity and the sensitivity of the individual. To sensitive individuals, vibrations approaching the threshold of perception can be annoying. Persons accustomed to elevated ambient vibration levels, such as in an urban environment, may tolerate higher vibration levels. Table 3 displays the human response and the effects on buildings resulting from continuous vibration (in terms of various levels of PPV). Table 3 Human Reaction to Typical Vibration Levels Vibration Level, PPV (in/sec) Human Reaction Effect on Buildings 0.006–0.019 Threshold of perception, possibility of intrusion Vibrations unlikely to cause damage of any type 0.08 Vibrations readily perceptible Recommended upper level of vibration to which ruins and ancient monuments should be subjected 0.10 Level at which continuous vibration begins to annoy people Virtually no risk of “architectural” (i.e. not structural) damage to normal buildings 0.20 Vibrations annoying to people in buildings Threshold at which there is a risk to “architectural” damage to normal dwelling – houses with plastered walls and ceilings 0.4–0.6 Vibrations considered unpleasant by people subjected to continuous vibrations and unacceptable to some people walking on bridges Vibrations at a greater level than normally expected from traffic, but would cause “architectural” damage and possibly minor structural damage Source: California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2004, June. Transportation- and Construction-Induced Vibration Guidance Manual. Prepared by ICF International. Noise Regulations and Guidelines Compliance with State, City, and LAUSD noise requirements and guidelines is required for schools as described below. State California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2 Current law states that every local agency enforcing building regulations, such as cities and counties, must adopt the provisions of the California Building Code (CBC) within 180 days of its publication. The publication date of the CBC is established by the California Building Standards Commission. The most recent building standard adopted by the legislature and used throughout the state is the 2016 version, often with local, more restrictive amendments that are based on local geographic, topographic, or climatic conditions.5 The State of California’s noise insulation standards are codified in the CBC. These noise standards are for new construction in California for the purposes of interior compatibility with exterior noise sources. The regulations specify that acoustical studies must be prepared when noise-sensitive structures, such as residential, schools, or hospitals, are near major transportation noises, and where such noise sources create an exterior noise level of 60 dBA CNEL or higher. Acoustical studies that accompany building plans must demonstrate that the structure has been designed to limit interior noise in habitable rooms to acceptable noise levels. For new residential buildings, schools, and hospitals, the acceptable interior noise limit for new construction is 45 dBA CNEL. City of Cupertino Municipal Code Noise limits Individual noise sources, or the combination of a group of noise sources located on the same property, shall not produce a noise levels exceeding those summarized in Table 4. Table 4 Daytime and Nighttime Maximum Noise Levels Land Use at Point of Origin Maximum Noise Level at Complaint Site of Receiving Property Nighttime Daytime Residential 50 dBA 60 dBA Non-Residential 55 dBA 65 dBA Source: City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Section 10.48.040 During the daytime period only, brief noise incidents exceeding limits in other sections of this chapter are allowed; providing, that the sum of the noise duration in minutes plus the excess noise level does not exceed twenty in a two-hour period. For example, Table 5 shows combinations that would be allowable. Table 5 Allowable Noise Exceeding Limits and Durations Noise Increment Above Normal Standard Noise Duration in 2-Hour Period 5 dBA 15 minutes 10 dBA 10 minutes 15 dBA 5 minutes 19 dBA 1 minute Source: City of Cupertino Municipal Code, Section 10.48.050 Grading, Construction, and Demolition Grading, construction and demolition activities shall be allowed to exceed the daytime and nighttime maximum noise limits summarized in Table 4 provided, that the equipment utilized has high-quality noise muffler and abatement devices installed and in good condition, and the activity meets one of the following two criteria: No individual device produces a noise level more than 87 dBA at a distance of 25 feet; or The noise level on any nearby property does not 80 dBA. No grading, street construction, demolition or underground utility work within 750 feet of a residential area on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, and during the nighttime period, except in cases of emergencies where the emission of sound for the purpose of alerting persons to the existence of an emergency or the emission of sound in the performance of emergency work.. Construction is prohibited on holidays and during nighttime periods unless it meets the nighttime standards. The use of helicopters as a part of a construction and/or demolition activity shall be restricted to between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday only, and prohibited on the weekends and holidays CONSTRUCTION NOISE MODELING OUTPUT Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 01/11/2019 Case Description: COCU-13 **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Demolition Residential 60.0 55.0 60.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 200.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 200.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 200.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 200.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Concrete Saw 77.5 70.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 69.6 65.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 72.0 68.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 67.1 63.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 77.5 73.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 01/11/2019 Case Description: COCU-13 **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Site Prep Residential 60.0 55.0 60.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 200.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 200.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 73.0 69.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 72.0 68.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 73.0 71.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 01/11/2019 Case Description: COCU-13 **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Grading Residential 60.0 55.0 60.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 200.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 200.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 200.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 200.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Concrete Saw 77.5 70.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 69.6 65.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 72.0 68.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 67.1 63.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 77.5 73.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 01/11/2019 Case Description: COCU-13 **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Building Construction Residential 60.0 55.0 60.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Crane No 16 80.6 200.0 0.0 Man Lift No 20 74.7 200.0 0.0 Man Lift No 20 74.7 200.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 200.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 200.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Crane 68.5 60.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Man Lift 62.7 55.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Man Lift 62.7 55.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 72.0 68.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 67.1 63.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.0 70.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 01/11/2019 Case Description: COCU-13 **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Paving Residential 60.0 55.0 60.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Drum Mixer No 50 80.0 200.0 0.0 Drum Mixer No 50 80.0 200.0 0.0 Drum Mixer No 50 80.0 200.0 0.0 Drum Mixer No 50 80.0 200.0 0.0 Paver No 50 77.2 200.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 200.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 200.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Drum Mixer 68.0 64.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Drum Mixer 68.0 64.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Drum Mixer 68.0 64.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Drum Mixer 68.0 64.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 65.2 62.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 68.0 61.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 72.0 68.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.0 73.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 01/11/2019 Case Description: COCU-13 **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Painting Residential 60.0 55.0 60.0 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 200.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Compressor (air) 65.6 61.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 65.6 61.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A TRAFFIC NOISE INCREASE CALCULATIONS SegmentExisting No ProjectExisting Plus Project Noise IncreaseCumulative Plus Project (Vallco Conditions)Cumulative IncreaseSunnyvale Saratoga Rd ‐ N. of Homestaead Rd 4602 46640.14952 0.3N De Anza Blvd ‐ South of Homestead Rd 3678 36910.05831 2.0Homestead Rd ‐ East of N DeAnza Blvd 2307 23380.13340 1.6Homestead Rd ‐ West of N DeAnza Blvd 2691 27090.02819 0.2N DeAnza Blvd ‐ I‐280 North Ramps to Homestead Rd 4861 49310.15907 0.8N DeAnza Blvd ‐ South of I‐280 North Ramps 4415 45020.16118 1.4I‐280 North Ramps ‐ East of N DeAnza Blvd 1015 10210.01554 1.8I‐280 North Ramps ‐ West of N DeAnza Blvd 1525 15360.01245 ‐0.9N DeAnza Blvd ‐ I‐280 South Ramps to Homestead Rd 4993 50110.06098 0.9N DeAnza Blvd ‐ I‐280 South Ramps to Mariani Ave 5029 50820.06045 0.8I‐280 South Ramps ‐ East of N DeAnza Blvd 1096 1103‐1324 0.8I‐280 South Ramps ‐ West of N DeAnza Blvd 1116 11440.1973 ‐0.6N DeAnza Blvd ‐ North of Mariani Ave 3842 38600.00N Deanza Blvd ‐ South of Mariani Ave 4331 43490.00Mariani Ave ‐ East of N DeAnza Blvd 692 6920.00Mariani Ave ‐ West of N DeAnza Blvd 871 871‐0Stevens Creek Blvd ‐ North of N DeAnza Blvd 4122 41280.04854 0.7Stevens Creek Blvd ‐ South of N DeAnza Blvd 3978 39920.04796 0.8N DeAnza Blvd ‐ East of Stevens Creek Blvd 3189 31930.04373 1.4N DeAnza Blvd ‐ West of Stevens Creek Blvd 3141 31450.03799 0.8 ........................................................................................................................ APPENDIX D: TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................................ 10931 North De Anza Boulevard Hotel Transportation Impact Analysis Prepared for: City of Cupertino June 13, 2019 Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Hexagon Office: 4 North Second Street, Suite 400 San Jose, CA 95113 Hexagon Job Number: 18BJ11 Phone: 408.971.6100 Client Name: City of Cupertino 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | i i Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... iii 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 8 3. Background Conditions ............................................................................................................... 15 4. Project Conditions ....................................................................................................................... 18 5. Other Transportation Issues ........................................................................................................ 26 Appendices Appendix A VTA CMP Guidelines Language Appendix B New Traffic Counts Appendix C Lists of Approved Projects and Approved Project Trip Assignments Appendix D Intersection Level of Service Calculations List of Tables Table ES-1 Intersection Level of Service Summary .............................................................................. iv Table 1 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions Based on Control Delay ....................... 5 Table 2 Freeway Segment Capacity Evaluation ............................................................................... 6 Table 3 Existing Intersection Levels of Service .............................................................................. 14 Table 4 Background Intersection Levels of Service ........................................................................ 17 Table 5 Project Trip Generation Estimates ..................................................................................... 20 Table 6 Existing Plus Project Intersection Levels of Service ........................................................... 20 Table 7 Background Plus Project Intersection Levels of Service .................................................... 24 Table 8 Queuing Analysis Summary .............................................................................................. 36 Table 9 Transit Delay Analysis Summary ....................................................................................... 38 List of Figures Figure 1 Site Location and Study Intersections .................................................................................. 2 Figure 2 Project Site Plan .................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 3 Existing Bicycle Facilities ................................................................................................... 10 Figure 4 Existing Transit Service ..................................................................................................... 11 Figure 5 Existing Lane Configurations ............................................................................................. 12 Figure 6 Existing Traffic Volumes .................................................................................................... 13 Figure 7 Background Traffic Volumes .............................................................................................. 16 Figure 8 Project Trip Distribution ..................................................................................................... 21 Figure 9 Project Trip Assignment .................................................................................................... 22 Figure 10 Existing Plus Project Traffic Volumes ................................................................................ 23 Figure 11 Background Plus Project Traffic Volumes .......................................................................... 25 Figure 12 Parking Garage Below-Grade Level 1 Layout .................................................................... 27 Figure 13 Parking Garage Below-Grade Level 2 Layout .................................................................... 28 Figure 14 Parking Garage Below-Grade Level 3 Layout .................................................................... 29 Figure 15 Parking Garage Below-Grade Level 4 Layout .................................................................... 30 Figure 16 SU-30 Truck Turning Template ......................................................................................... 34 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | i i i Executive Summary This study was conducted for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and identifying the potential transportation impacts related to the proposed hotel at 10931 North De Anza Boulevard in Cupertino, California. Located on the west side of North De Anza Boulevard, the project would replace the Goodyear Auto Service Center with a six-story hotel consisting of up to 156 guest rooms, an approximately 10,000 square-foot (s.f.) restaurant/bar/lounge, and 4,242 s.f. of conference/meeting space. The project would eliminate 35 surface parking stalls associated with the auto service center and construct a four-level below-grade parking garage containing 207 parking stalls. Eleven at-grade parking stalls also would serve the project, for a total of 218 parking stalls. Access to the project site is provided by two existing right-turn only driveways on North De Anza Boulevard. The potential impacts of the project were evaluated in accordance with the standards set forth by the City of Cupertino, as well as the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Congestion Management Program (CMP). The study includes an analysis of weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions for 5 signalized intersections and 2 freeway segments in the vicinity of the project site. The study also includes an analysis of site access, on-site circulation, vehicle queuing, transit service, bicycle and pedestrian access, and parking. Based on trip generation rates recommended by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, it is estimated that the proposed project would generate 1,562 net new daily vehicle trips, with 73 new trips occurring during the AM peak hour and 87 new trips occurring during the PM peak hour. Project Intersection Level of Service Analysis The results of the intersection level of service analysis show that all the study intersections would continue to operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS D or better) during both the AM and PM peak hours of traffic under background plus project conditions (see Table ES-1). Thus, none of the study intersections would be significantly impacted by the project, according to the City of Cupertino significant impact criteria. Freeway Segment Capacity Evaluation According to CMP guidelines, an analysis of freeway segment levels of service is only required if a project is estimated to add trips to a freeway segment equal to or greater than one percent of the capacity of that segment. Since the number of project trips added to the freeways in the area is estimated to be well below the one percent threshold, a detailed analysis of freeway segment levels of service was not required. A simple freeway segment capacity evaluation to substantiate this determination is presented in Table 2 in Chapter 1. 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | i v Table ES-1 Intersection Level of Service Summary Study # Intersection LOS LOS LOS LOS AM 03/28/18 37.2 D+ 37.5 D+ 0.0 0.001 37.8 D+ 38.2 D+ 0.0 0.001 PM 10/12/16 38.7 D+ 39.3 D 1.3 0.010 39.5 D 40.2 D 1.4 0.010 AM 05/02/18 21.9 C+ 21.8 C+ 0.0 0.004 21.9 C+ 21.8 C+ 0.0 0.004 PM 10/12/16 35.5 D+ 36.0 D+ 1.1 0.008 36.1 D+ 36.6 D+ 1.2 0.008 AM 05/02/18 22.4 C+ 22.7 C+ 0.5 0.007 23.0 C+ 23.3 C 0.5 0.007 PM 10/12/16 21.4 C+ 22.0 C+ 1.4 0.012 21.7 C+ 22.2 C+ 1.5 0.012 AM 05/02/18 37.4 D+ 37.4 D+ 0.0 0.001 37.4 D+ 37.4 D+ 0.0 0.001 PM 05/01/18 39.0 D+ 38.9 D+ 0.0 0.001 39.0 D 39.0 D+ 0.0 0.001 AM 05/02/18 35.5 D+ 35.6 D+ 0.1 0.003 35.9 D+ 35.9 D+ 0.1 0.003 PM 10/12/16 43.7 D 43.7 D 0.0 0.001 44.6 D 44.6 D 0.0 0.001 Note: *Denotes a CMP designated Intersection Existing Conditions Background Conditions No ProjectNo Project with Project Avg. Delay (sec) N. De Anza Boulevard and I-280 S Ramps * N. De Anza Boulevard and Mariani Avenue N. De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard * Count Date N. De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road * N. De Anza Boulevard and I-280 N Ramps * Peak Hour Incr. in Critical V/C Avg. Delay (sec) with Project Avg. Delay (sec) Incr. in Crit. Delay (sec) Incr. in Critical V/C Avg. Delay (sec) Incr. in Crit. Delay (sec) 1 2 3 4 5 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | v Other Transportation Issues The proposed site plan shows adequate site access and on-site circulation, and the project would not have an adverse effect on the existing transit services, pedestrian facilities, or bicycle facilities in the study area. The following recommendation was identified:  Convex mirrors should be placed on each parking level at appropriate locations to assist drivers with blind turns within the parking garage. 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 1 1. Introduction This report presents the results of the Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) conducted for the proposed hotel at 10931 North De Anza Boulevard in Cupertino, California (see Figure 1). Located on the west side of North De Anza Boulevard, the project would replace the Goodyear Auto Service Center with a six-story hotel consisting of up to 156 guest rooms, an approximately 10,000 square-foot (s.f.) restaurant/bar/lounge, and 4,242 s.f. of conference/meeting space (see Figure 2). The project would eliminate 35 surface parking stalls associated with the auto service center and construct a four-level below-grade parking garage containing 207 parking stalls. Eleven at-grade parking stalls also would serve the project, for a total of 218 parking stalls. Access to the project site is provided by two existing right-turn only driveways on North De Anza Boulevard. Scope of Study This study was conducted for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and identifying the potential transportation related impacts as a result of the proposed development. The potential impacts of the project were evaluated in accordance with the standards set forth by the City of Cupertino, as well as the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). The VTA administers the Santa Clara County Congestion Management Program (CMP). For projects that would generate fewer than 100 net new peak hour vehicle trips, a CMP analysis is not required (see Appendix A for CMP “100 trip” language). A CMP analysis was not required because the project would generate fewer than 100 net new peak hour trips. The traffic study includes an analysis of AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions for five (5) signalized intersections and two (2) freeway segments near the project site (see below). This study also includes an analysis of site access, on-site circulation, vehicle queuing, bicycle and pedestrian access, transit service, and parking. Study Intersections 1. North De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road (CMP intersection) 2. North De Anza Boulevard and I-280 North Ramps (CMP intersection) 3. North De Anza Boulevard and I-280 South Ramps (CMP intersection) 4. North De Anza Boulevard and Mariani Avenue 5. North De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard (CMP intersection) Study Freeway Segments 1. I-280, between SR 85 and North De Anza Boulevard 2. I-280, between North De Anza Boulevard and Wolfe Road 10931 N. De Anza Boulevard Hotel Figure 1 Site Location and Study Intersections Cupertino Inverness Way E Homestead Rd N Stelling RdN De Anza BlvdN Blaney AveStevens Creek Blvd N Portal AveS Wolfe RdS Mary AveMariani Ave Pr u n e r i d g e A v e Torre AveVallco Pkwy Miller AveFinch AveHollenbeck AveX = Study Intersection = Site Location LEGEND 280 85 5 4 3 2 1 10931 N. De Anza Boulevard HotelFigure 2Project Site Plan 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 4 Traffic conditions at the study intersections were analyzed for both the weekday AM and PM peak hours of adjacent street traffic. The AM peak hour typically occurs between 7:00 AM and 10:00 AM and the PM peak hour typically occurs between 4:00 PM and 7:00 PM on a regular weekday. These are the peak commute hours during which most traffic congestion occurs on the roadways in the study area. Traffic conditions were evaluated for the following scenarios: Scenario 1: Existing Conditions. Existing traffic volumes at study intersections were based on new traffic counts conducted in March and May of 2018, as well as October 2016 PM count data obtained from the most recent (2016) CMP traffic count database. The study intersections were evaluated with a level of service analysis using TRAFFIX software in accordance with the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual methodology. Study freeway segments were analyzed in accordance with VTA CMP methods. The new intersection count data are included in Appendix B. Scenario 2: Existing plus Project Conditions. Existing traffic volumes with the project were estimated by adding to existing traffic volumes the additional traffic generated by the project. Existing plus project conditions were evaluated relative to existing conditions in order to determine the effects the project would have on the existing roadway network. Scenario 3: Background Conditions. Background traffic volumes reflect traffic added by projected volumes from approved but not yet completed and/or occupied developments in the project area. The approved project trips and/or approved project information was obtained from the Cities of Cupertino and Sunnyvale. The approved project information is included in Appendix C. Scenario 4: Background plus Project Conditions. Background traffic volumes with the project were estimated by adding to background traffic volumes the additional traffic generated by the project. Background plus project conditions were evaluated relative to background conditions in order to determine potential project impacts. Methodology This section presents the methods used to determine the traffic conditions for each scenario described above. It includes descriptions of the data requirements, the analysis methodologies, and the applicable level of service standards. Data Requirements The data required for the analysis were obtained from new traffic counts, the City of Cupertino, the City of Sunnyvale, the CMP annual Monitoring Report, and field observations. The following data were collected from these sources:  existing traffic volumes  lane configurations  intersection signal timing and phasing  approved project information Level of Service Standards and Analysis Methodologies Traffic conditions at the study intersections were evaluated using level of service (LOS). Level of Service is a qualitative description of operating conditions ranging from LOS A, or free-flow conditions with little or no delay, to LOS F, or jammed conditions with excessive delays. The various analysis methods are described below. 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 5 Signalized Study Intersections All the study intersections are located in the City of Cupertino. The City of Cupertino evaluates level of service at signalized intersections based on the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) level of service methodology using TRAFFIX software. This method evaluates signalized intersection operations on the basis of average control delay time for all vehicles at the intersection. The correlation between average control delay and level of service at signalized intersections is shown in Table 1. The City of Cupertino level of service standard for most signalized intersections is LOS D or better. For the study intersection of De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard, the level of service standard is LOS E+ or better. Table 1 Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions Based on Control Delay CMP Intersections Of the five intersections studied in the City of Cupertino, four are designated CMP intersections. The designated level of service methodology for the CMP also is the 2000 HCM operations method for signalized intersections, using TRAFFIX. The CMP level of service standard for signalized intersections is LOS E or better. However, within the City of Cupertino, the level of service standard for all but a few signalized intersections, including CMP intersections, is LOS D or better. As previously noted, the level of service standard for the study intersection of De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard is LOS E+ or better. 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 6 Intersection Operations The analysis of intersection level of service was supplemented with an analysis of traffic operations for intersections where the project would add a significant number of left turns. The operations analysis is based on vehicle queuing for high demand left-turn movements at intersections. Vehicle queues were estimated using a Poisson probability distribution, which estimates the probability of “n” vehicles for a vehicle movement using the following formula: P (x=n) = n e – ( n! Where: P (x=n) = probability of “n” vehicles in queue per lane n = number of vehicles in the queue per lane average # of vehicles in the queue per lane (vehicles per hr per lane/signal cycles per hr) The basis of the analysis is as follows: (1) the Poisson probability distribution is used to estimate the 95th percentile maximum number of queued vehicles per signal cycle for a particular movement; (2) the estimated maximum number of vehicles in the queue is translated into a queue length, assuming 25 feet per vehicle; and (3) the estimated maximum queue length is compared to the existing or planned available storage capacity for the movement. This analysis thus provides a basis for estimating future turn pocket storage requirements at signalized intersections. The 95th percentile queue length value indicates that during the peak hour, a queue of this length or less would occur on 95 percent of the signal cycles. Or, a queue length longer than the 95th percentile queue would only occur on 5 percent of the signal cycles (about 3 cycles during the peak hour for a signal with a 60-second cycle length). Therefore, left-turn storage pocket designs based on the 95 th percentile queue length would ensure that storage space would be exceeded only 5 percent of the time. The 95th percentile queue length is also known as the “design queue length.” Freeway Segments According to CMP guidelines, an analysis of freeway segment levels of service is only required if a project is estimated to add trips to a freeway segment equal to or greater than one percent of the capacity of that segment. Since the number of project trips added to the freeways in the area is estimated to be well below the one percent threshold, a detailed analysis of freeway segment levels of service was not performed. A simple freeway segment capacity evaluation to substantiate this determination is presented below in Table 2. Table 2 Freeway Segment Capacity Evaluation Mixed-Flow HOV Mixed-Flow HOV Lanes 1% of Lane 1% of Lanes Lane 1% or Peak Capacity Mixed-Flow Capacity HOV Project Project More of Freeway Direction Hour (vph) 1 Capacity (vph) 1 Capacity Trips Trips Capacity?0 AM 6900 69 1800 18 5 1 NO PM 6900 69 1800 18 5 2 NO AM 6900 69 1800 18 6 2 NO PM 6900 69 1800 18 9 2 NO AM 6900 69 1800 18 9 2 NO PM 6900 69 1800 18 9 2 NO AM 6900 69 1800 18 4 1 NO PM 6900 69 1800 18 5 1 NO Notes: 1 Capacity based on the ideal capacity cited in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Segment WB WB EB EB I-280 SR 85 to De Anza Bl I-280 De Anza Bl to Wolfe Rd I-280 Wolfe Rd to De Anza Bl I-280 De Anza Bl to SR 85 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 7 Significant Impact Criteria Significance criteria are used to establish what constitutes an impact. For the purposes of this study, the criteria used to determine significant impacts on signalized intersections are based on the level of service standards for the City of Cupertino. Since the level of service standards for all signalized intersections within the City of Cupertino are more stringent than the CMP level of service standard, a separate CMP intersection analysis according to the CMP methodology was not necessary. Definition of Significant Intersection Impacts The project is said to create a significant adverse impact on traffic conditions at a signalized intersection in the City of Cupertino if for either peak hour: 1. The level of service at the intersection under background conditions drops below its respective level of service standard when project traffic is added, or 2. The level of service at the intersection operates below its respective level of service standard under background conditions and the addition of project traffic causes both the critical- movement delay at the intersection to increase by four (4) or more seconds and the volume-to- capacity ratio (V/C) to increase by one percent (0.01) or more. An exception to criterion 2 above applies when the addition of project traffic reduces the amount of average delay for critical movements (i.e., the change in average delay for critical movements is negative). In this case, the threshold of significance is an increase in the critical V/C value by 0.01 or more. Report Organization The remainder of this report is divided into four chapters. Chapter 2 describes the existing roadway network, transit services, and pedestrian facilities. Chapter 3 presents the intersection operations under background conditions and describes the approved projects in the Cities of Cupertino and Sunnyvale that would likely add traffic to the study area. Chapter 4 describes the methods used to estimate project-generated traffic and its impact on the transportation system. Chapter 5 presents the analysis of other transportation related issues including transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities. 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 8 2. Existing Conditions This chapter describes the existing conditions for transportation facilities in the vicinity of the site, including the roadway network, transit service, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and the existing levels of service for the key intersections in the study area. Existing Roadway Network Regional access to the project site is provided via Interstate 280 (I-280). Local access to the site is provided by North De Anza Boulevard, Homestead Road, and Stevens Creek Boulevard. I-280 is a north/south, eight-lane freeway that extends from US 101 in San Jose to I-80 in San Francisco. It is generally an east-west oriented eight-lane freeway in the vicinity of the project site. I-280 is eight lanes wide with three mixed-flow lanes and one high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane in each direction in the vicinity of the project site. I-280 provides site access via a full interchange at North De Anza Boulevard. North De Anza Boulevard is a north/south arterial that extends from Homestead Road in Cupertino south to Prospect Road, bordering Saratoga. Near the project site, North De Anza Boulevard is six lanes wide and has a posted speed limit of 40 mph. North De Anza Boulevard has sidewalks on both sides of the street, bike lanes in both directions and no on-street parking permitted in the project vicinity. As an arterial, North De Anza Boulevard distributes trips to commercial and residential areas and provides a balanced level of service between vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. The project site is directly accessible from North De Anza Boulevard. Homestead Road is an east/west arterial that extends from Lafayette Street in Santa Clara west through Cupertino to Los Altos, where it merges with Foothill Expressway. In the vicinity of the project site, Homestead Road is four- to five-lanes wide and has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Homestead Road has sidewalks on both sides of the street, bike lanes in both directions and no on-street parking permitted in the project vicinity. As an arterial, Homestead Road distributes trips to commercial and residential areas and provides a balanced level of service between vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. Access from Homestead Road to the project site is provided via North De Anza Boulevard. Stevens Creek Boulevard is an east/west arterial that extends from Bascom Avenue in San Jose west through Cupertino, where it becomes Permanente Road. In the vicinity of the project site, Stevens Creek Boulevard is six lanes wide and has a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Stevens Creek Boulevard has sidewalks on both sides of the street, bike lanes in both directions and no on-street parking permitted. As an arterial, Stevens Creek Boulevard distributes trips to commercial and residential areas and provides a balanced level of service between vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. Access from Stevens Creek Boulevard to the project site is provided via North De Anza Boulevard. 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 9 Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Pedestrian facilities consist of sidewalks, crosswalks, and pedestrian signals at signalized intersections. In the vicinity of the project site, sidewalks exist along both sides of North De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road, providing pedestrian access to and from the project site. The project site can be accessed via the parking lot of the adjacent Homestead Square Shopping Center. Marked crosswalks with pedestrian signal heads and push buttons are provided on all approaches of the signalized study intersections, except the south leg of the North De Anza Boulevard /I-280 northbound ramps intersection and the north leg of the North De Anza Boulevard /I-280 southbound ramps intersection. Although some crosswalk connections are missing, the overall network of sidewalks and crosswalks in the study area has adequate connectivity and provides pedestrians with safe routes to transit services and other points of interest in the vicinity of the project site. Existing Bicycle Facilities There are some bicycle facilities in the vicinity of the project site. The existing bicycle facilities within the study area are described below and are shown on Figure 3. North-south bicycle connections in the study area include striped bike lanes along North De Anza Boulevard between Stevens Creek Boulevard and Homestead Road, where they continue into Sunnyvale. Bike lanes are lanes on roadways designated for use by bicycles with special lane markings, pavement legends, and signage. East-west bicycle connections in the study area consist of striped bike lanes along Homestead Road between Lafayette Street and Foothill Expressway, Mariani Avenue east of North De Anza Road, and Stevens Creek Boulevard between Lawrence Expressway and California Oak Way. Existing Transit Service Existing transit service near the project site is provided by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). Access to the nearby existing bus service (Local Bus Routes 55 and 81) is provided via bus stops located near each of the corners of the North De Anza Boulevard/Homestead Road intersection, approximately a two-minute walk (about 500 feet) from the project site. Local Route 55 provides transit service from De Anza College to Great America Parkway between 5:38am and 10;54pm, with 15- to 35-minute headways depending on the stop and direction. Local Route 81 provides transit service from Moffett Field/Ames Center to San Jose State University between 6:06am and 9:04pm, with 25- to 35-minute headways depending on the stop and direction. The transit service routes that run through the study area are shown on Figure 4. Existing Intersection Lane Configurations and Traffic Volumes The existing lane configurations at the study intersections were determined by observations in the field and are shown on Figure 5. Existing traffic volumes were obtained from peak hour turning movement counts collected on October 12th of 2016, and March 28th, May 1st, and May 2nd of 2018. The 2016 count data were obtained from the VTA’s CMP count database for the four CMP study intersections and consist of PM peak hour counts only. AM peak hour count data for all study intersections and PM peak hour count data for the non-CMP study intersection were obtained from new turning movement counts conducted in 2018. The existing peak-hour intersection volumes are shown on Figure 6. New intersection turning- movement counts conducted for this analysis are presented in Appendix B. 10931 N. De Anza Boulevard Hotel Figure 3 Existing Bicycle Facilities Cupertino Inverness Way E Homestead Rd N Stelling RdN De Anza BlvdN Blaney AveStevens Creek Blvd N Portal AveS Wolfe RdS Mary AveMariani Ave Pr u n e r i d g e A v e Torre AveVallco Pkwy Miller AveFinch AveHollenbeck AveX = Study Intersection = Site Location LEGEND 280 85 5 4 3 2 1 = Class II Bike Lanes 10931 N. De Anza Boulevard Hotel Figure 4 Existing Transit Service Cupertino 280 85 Inverness Way E Homestead Rd N De Anza BlvdN Blaney AveStevens Creek BlvdN Portal AveS Wolfe RdS Mary AveMariani Ave Pr u n e r i d g e A v e Torre AveVallco Pkwy Miller AveFinch AveHollenbeck Ave55 53 53 53 53 54 81 23 23 23 81 81 81 81 81 8155 55 55 55 = Site Location LEGEND = Local Bus Route 23 = Local Bus Route 53 = Local Bus Route 54 ve23 53 54 = Local Bus Route 55 = Local Bus Route 81 = Bus Stop 55 81 10931 N. De Anza Boulevard Hotel Figure 5 Existing Lane Configurations Cupertino Inverness Way E Homestead Rd N Stelling RdN De Anza BlvdN Blaney AveStevens Creek Blvd N Portal AveS Wolfe RdS Mary AveMariani Ave Pr u n e r i d g e A v e Torre AveVallco Pkwy Miller AveFinch AveHollenbeck AveX = Study Intersection = Site Location LEGEND 280 85 5 4 3 2 1 De AnzaBlvdHomestead Rd NB Ramps I-280 SB Ramps I-280 Mariani Ave Creek Blvd De AnzaBlvdDe AnzaBlvdDe AnzaBlvdDe AnzaBlvdStevens 21 34 5 10931 N. De Anza Boulevard Hotel Figure 6 Existing Traffic Volumes Cupertino Inverness Way E Homestead Rd N Stelling RdN De Anza BlvdN Blaney AveStevens Creek Blvd N Portal AveS Wolfe RdS Mary AveMariani Ave Pr u n e r i d g e A v e Torre AveVallco Pkwy Miller AveFinch AveHollenbeck AveX = Study Intersection = Site Location LEGEND = AM(PM) Peak-Hour Traffic VolumesXX(XX) 280 85 5 4 3 2 1 De AnzaBlvdHomestead Rd NB Ramps I-280 SB Ramps I-280 Mariani Ave Creek Blvd De AnzaBlvdDe AnzaBlvdDe AnzaBlvdDe AnzaBlvdStevens 21 34 5 333(475)1749(1349)159(660)162(380)1058(1465)65(146)435(308) 573(479) 318(170) 271(168) 336(694) 304(345)518(404)1512(780)235(298)331(517)492(1817)217(370)207(360) 673(680) 294(252) 236(240) 422(1034) 112(461)1238(1847)545(602)532(508)1725(2064)534(610) 0(6) 782(480)395(694)1453(1597)1414(1772)498(320)763(798) 0(1) 615(726)56(113)1285(1262)158(34)755(223)1202(2145)146(85)112(231) 58(36) 89(281) 196(335) 186(66) 21(57) 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 1 4 Existing Intersection Levels of Service Intersection levels of service were evaluated against the City of Cupertino standards. The results of the intersection level of service analysis show that all the study intersections currently operate at an acceptable level of service during both the AM and PM peak hours of traffic (see Table 3). The intersection level of service calculation sheets are provided in Appendix D. Table 3 Existing Intersection Levels of Service Observed Traffic Conditions Traffic conditions were observed in the field in order to identify existing operational deficiencies and to confirm the accuracy of calculated intersection levels of service. The purpose of this effort was (1) to identify any existing traffic problems that may not be directly related to level of service, and (2) to identify any locations where the level of service analysis does not accurately reflect existing traffic conditions. Overall, most study intersections operated adequately during both the AM and PM peak hours of traffic, and the level of service analysis appears to accurately reflect existing traffic conditions. However, field observations showed that during the AM peak hour, congestion along North De Anza Boulevard in the northbound direction is not reflected in the intersection level of service calculations. The northbound congestion along North De Anza Boulevard at the I-280 Northbound Ramps spills back past the I-280 Southbound Ramps, creating additional delay for the northbound through movement at both intersections, as well as the westbound and eastbound right-turn movements at the I-280 southbound ramps. Due to the spillback, some vehicles required more than one signal cycle to clear the intersections. Study Number Intersection AM 03/28/18 37.2 D+ PM 10/12/16 38.7 D+ AM 05/02/18 21.9 C+ PM 10/12/16 35.5 D+ AM 05/02/18 22.4 C+ PM 10/12/16 21.4 C+ AM 05/02/18 37.4 D+ PM 05/01/18 39.0 D+ AM 05/02/18 35.5 D+ PM 10/12/16 43.7 D Note: *Denotes a CMP designated Intersection Existing Conditions Avg. Delay (sec) Peak Hour Count Date LOS 5 N. De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road * N. De Anza Boulevard and I-280 N Ramps * N. De Anza Boulevard and I-280 S Ramps * N. De Anza Boulevard and Mariani Avenue N. De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard * 1 2 3 4 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 1 5 3. Background Conditions This chapter describes background traffic conditions, which are defined as conditions just prior to completion of the proposed project. Traffic volumes for background conditions comprise volumes from existing traffic volumes plus traffic generated by other approved developments in the vicinity of the site. This chapter describes the planned roadway network, the procedure used to determine background traffic volumes, and the resulting traffic conditions. Roadway Network and Traffic Volumes Under Background Conditions It is assumed in this analysis that the transportation network under background conditions would be the same as the existing transportation network because there are no planned and funded transportation improvements at the study intersections. Background peak hour traffic volumes were estimated by adding to existing traffic volumes the trips generated by nearby approved but not yet completed or occupied projects (see Figure 7). Approved project information was obtained from the Cities of Cupertino and Sunnyvale lists of approved projects (see Appendix C). Trip generation estimates for the approved projects were based on their respective traffic studies, if available. For relatively small projects that did not require a traffic study, trips were estimated based on ITE trip rates. The estimated trips from the approved projects were distributed and assigned throughout the study area based on the trip distribution assumptions present in the traffic studies or based on knowledge of travel patterns in the study area. Background Intersection Level of Service Intersection levels of service were evaluated against the City of Cupertino standards. The results of the level of service analysis show that all the study intersections would continue to operate at an acceptable level of service during both the AM and PM peak hours of traffic under background conditions (see Table 4). The intersection level of service calculation sheets are provided in Appendix D. 10931 N. De Anza Boulevard Hotel Figure 7 Background Traffic Volumes Cupertino Inverness Way E Homestead Rd N Stelling RdN De Anza BlvdN Blaney AveStevens Creek Blvd N Portal AveS Wolfe RdS Mary AveMariani Ave Pr u n e r i d g e A v e Torre AveVallco Pkwy Miller AveFinch AveHollenbeck AveX = Study Intersection = Site Location LEGEND = AM(PM) Peak-Hour Traffic VolumesXX(XX) 280 85 5 4 3 2 1 De AnzaBlvdHomestead Rd NB Ramps I-280 SB Ramps I-280 Mariani Ave Creek Blvd De AnzaBlvdDe AnzaBlvdDe AnzaBlvdDe AnzaBlvdStevens 21 34 5 336(472)1750(1353)200(661)191(386)1065(1464)67(144)438(328) 580(501) 321(192) 272(167) 375(698) 308(343)521(401)1518(782)280(310)343(527)497(1819)219(368)212(396) 699(708) 305(263) 237(239) 439(1054) 116(459)1252(1859)549(603)533(509)1726(2065)572(610) 0(6) 793(491)406(705)1494(1598)1415(1775)501(338)764(801) 0(1) 615(727)56(113)1308(1247)158(34)755(223)1211(2136)146(85)112(231) 58(36) 89(281) 196(335) 186(66) 21(57) 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 1 7 Table 4 Background Intersection Levels of Service Study Number Intersection AM 37.2 D+ 37.8 D+ PM 38.7 D+ 39.5 D AM 21.9 C+ 21.9 C+ PM 35.5 D+ 36.1 D+ AM 22.4 C+ 23.0 C+ PM 21.4 C+ 21.7 C+ AM 37.4 D+ 37.4 D+ PM 39.0 D+ 39.0 D AM 35.5 D+ 35.9 D+ PM 43.7 D 44.6 D Note: *Denotes a CMP designated Intersection 4 N. De Anza Boulevard and Mariani Avenue 5 N. De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard * 2 N. De Anza Boulevard and I-280 N Ramps * 3 N. De Anza Boulevard and I-280 S Ramps * Background Conditions Avg. Delay (sec) 1 N. De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road * Peak Hour Existing Conditions Avg. Delay (sec) LOSLOS 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 1 8 4. Project Conditions This chapter describes traffic conditions with the project and includes: (1) the method by which project traffic is estimated and (2) a level of service summary. Existing plus project conditions are represented by existing traffic conditions with the addition of traffic generated by the project. Existing plus project traffic conditions could potentially occur if the project were to be occupied prior to the other approved projects in the area. Background plus project conditions are represented by background traffic conditions with the addition of traffic generated by the project. Transportation Network It is assumed in this analysis that the transportation network under project conditions would be the same as the existing transportation network. Project Trip Estimates The magnitude of traffic produced by a new development and the locations where that traffic would appear were estimated using a three-step process: (1) trip generation, (2) trip distribution, and (3) trip assignment. In determining project trip generation, the magnitude of traffic traveling to and from the proposed hotel was estimated for the AM and PM peak hours. As part of the project trip distribution, the directions to and from which the project trips would travel were estimated. In the project trip assignment, the project trips were assigned to specific streets and intersections. These procedures are described below. Trip Generation Trips generated by any new development are typically estimated based on counts of existing developments of the same land use type. A compilation of typical trip generation rates can be found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. Project trip generation was estimated by applying to the size and use of the proposed development the appropriate trip generation rates obtained from the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (2017). The average trip generation rates for Hotel (Land Use Category 310) were applied to the project. The ITE rates for the Hotel land use category include trips generated by ancillary uses/supporting facilities such as restaurants, fitness facilities, meeting rooms (for conferences, banquets, etc.), and cocktail lounges. Based on the ITE rates for Hotel, the proposed development would generate a total of 1,908 gross daily vehicle trips, with 97 gross trips occurring during the weekday AM peak hour and 114 gross trips occurring during the weekday PM peak hour (see Table 5). 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 1 9 Trip Reductions and Adjustments In accordance with VTA’s Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines (October 2014, Section 8.2.1, “Standard Trip Reductions”), the project is eligible for some reductions from the baseline trip generation described above. The applicable trip reductions are described below. Internal Mixed-Use Trip Reduction Given that the project would provide convenient access to the adjacent Homestead Square Shopping Center, the abundance of supporting retail uses is expected to reduce hotel-generated trips. Thus, in accordance with the 2014 VTA guidelines for projects with a mix of hotel and retail uses, a ten percent trip reduction was applied to the baseline project trip estimates to account for the internalization of trips (i.e., walking trips) between the hotel and the adjacent shopping center uses. TDM Reduction for Shuttle Program The project would offer a dedicated shuttle program for hotel employees and guests, which grants the project eligibility of a three (3) percent trip reduction per the VTA guidelines. The shuttle destinations would be determined based on hotel employee and guest needs. Existing Use Credit The trips generated by the existing occupied Goodyear Auto Service Center on the site can be subtracted from the trip generation estimates for the hotel. The existing tire store’s trip generation was obtained from manual AM and PM peak hour counts conducted on July 11th, 2018. The trips generated by the Goodyear tire store were isolated from the rest of the shopping center. Based on the counts, the existing auto service center is generating 11 vehicle trips during the weekday AM peak hour and 12 vehicle trips during the weekday PM peak hour. The daily trips generated by the existing tire store were estimated by multiplying the weekday AM and PM peak hour trips by a factor of the ratio of daily trips to the total AM and PM peak hour trip rates for Tire Store (ITE Land Use 848). Net Project Trips After applying the ITE trip rates, appropriate trip reductions, and existing site trip credits, the proposed hotel project would generate 1,562 net new daily vehicle trips, with 73 new trips occurring during the AM peak hour and 87 new trips occurring during the PM peak hour. Using the inbound/outbound splits contained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, the project would produce 42 new inbound and 31 new outbound trips during the AM peak hour, and 44 new inbound and 43 new outbound trips during the PM peak hour (See Table 5). Trip Distribution and Assignment The trip distribution pattern for the project was developed based on existing travel patterns on the surrounding roadway system and the locations of complementary land uses including airports. The peak hour vehicle trips generated by the project were assigned to the roadway network in accordance with the trip distribution pattern, with an emphasis on freeway access and project driveway location. Figure 8 shows the trip distribution pattern for the proposed hotel. Figure 9 shows the net project trip assignment at the study intersections. Existing Plus Project Traffic Volumes Project trips, as represented on Figure 9, were added to existing traffic volumes to obtain existing plus project traffic volumes. The existing plus project traffic volumes are shown on Figure 10. 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 2 0 Table 5 Project Trip Generation Estimates Existing Plus Project Intersection Analysis The results of the level of service analysis show that all the study intersections would operate at an acceptable level of service during both the AM and PM peak hours of traffic if the proposed project were completed and operating today (see Table 6). Note that the criteria that define a significant project impact at a signalized intersection in the City of Cupertino are based on comparing background plus project conditions to background (baseline) conditions. The intersection level of service calculation sheets are provided in Appendix D. Table 6 Existing Plus Project Intersection Levels of Service AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Trips In Out Total In Out Total Proposed Use Hotel 1 156 rooms 12.23 1,908 0.62 56 41 97 0.73 56 58 114 Hotel and Retail Internal Mixed-Use Reduction (10%) 2 (191) (6) (4) (10) (6) (5) (11) TDM Reduction for Dedicated Shuttle Program (3%) 2 (57) (2) (1) (3) (2) (2) (4) Subtotal: 1,660 48 36 84 48 51 99 Existing Use (Credits) Goodyear Auto Service Center 3 8,323 s.f. (98) (6) (5) (11) (4) (8) (12) Net Project Trips: 1,562 42 31 73 44 43 87 Notes: 1 Trip generation based on average rates contained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual , 10th Ed., for Hotel (Land Use 310, Occupied Rooms). 2 Trip reduction based on Standard Auto Trip Reduction Rates published in VTA's Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines, 2014. 3 Peak-hour trips for existing Goodyear Auto Service Center are based on driveway counts conducted on July 11, 2018. Daily trips are estimated based on the ratio of daily to total AM and PM peak hour trip rates for Tire Store (ITE Land Use 848). Size Trips Trips Daily Trip Rate Trip Rate Trip Rate AM 37.2 D+ 37.5 D+ 0.0 0.001 PM 38.7 D+ 39.3 D 1.3 0.010 AM 21.9 C+ 21.8 C+ 0.0 0.004 PM 35.5 D+ 36.0 D+ 1.1 0.008 AM 22.4 C+ 22.7 C+ 0.5 0.007 PM 21.4 C+ 22.0 C+ 1.4 0.012 AM 37.4 D+ 37.4 D+ 0.0 0.001 PM 39.0 D+ 38.9 D+ 0.0 0.001 AM 35.5 D+ 35.6 D+ 0.1 0.003 PM 43.7 D 43.7 D 0.0 0.001 Note: *Denotes a CMP designated Intersection Incr. in Crit. V/C With Project Existing Conditions Incr. in Crit. Delay (sec) Avg. Delay (sec) Avg. Delay (sec) No Project LOS LOS Peak Hour 5 N. De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard * N. De Anza Boulevard and I-280 N Ramps * 3 N. De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road * Study # 2 4 N. De Anza Boulevard and Mariani Avenue Intersection N. De Anza Boulevard and I-280 S Ramps * 1 10931 N. De Anza Boulevard Hotel Figure 8 Project Trip Distribution Cupertino Inverness Way E Homestead Rd N Stelling RdN De Anza BlvdN Blaney AveStevens Creek Blvd N Portal AveS Wolfe RdS Mary AveMariani Ave Pr u n e r i d g e A v e Torre AveVallco Pkwy Miller AveFinch AveHollenbeck AveX = Trip Distribution = Study Intersection = Site Location LEGEND XX% 280 85 5 4 3 2 1 5%20% 15%25%15%5%5%10% 10931 N. De Anza Boulevard Hotel Figure 9 Net Project Trip Assignment Cupertino Inverness Way E Homestead Rd N Stelling RdN De Anza BlvdN Blaney AveStevens Creek Blvd N Portal AveS Wolfe RdS Mary AveMariani Ave Pr u n e r i d g e A v e Torre AveVallco Pkwy Miller AveFinch AveHollenbeck AveX = Study Intersection = Site Location LEGEND = AM(PM) Peak-Hour TripsXX(XX) 280 85 5 4 3 2 1 De AnzaBlvdHomestead Rd NB Ramps I-280 SB Ramps I-280 Mariani Ave Creek Blvd De AnzaBlvdDe AnzaBlvdDe AnzaBlvdDe AnzaBlvdStevens 21 34 De AnzaBlvdGross Trips at the Project Driveways52(3)25(26)5(6)6(9)6(7)8(9) 2(2)4(4)2(2)3(4)2(2)31(31)17(17)7(10) 29(41) 2(2) 2(2)8(9)8(11)12(17)6(9)6(7)27(33)26(37)5(6)11(11)8(9)6(9) 10931 N. De Anza Boulevard Hotel Figure 10 Existing Plus Project Traffic Volumes Cupertino Inverness Way E Homestead Rd N Stelling RdN De Anza BlvdN Blaney AveStevens Creek Blvd N Portal AveS Wolfe RdS Mary AveMariani Ave Pr u n e r i d g e A v e Torre AveVallco Pkwy Miller AveFinch AveHollenbeck AveX = Study Intersection = Site Location LEGEND = AM(PM) Peak-Hour Traffic VolumesXX(XX) 280 85 5 4 3 2 1 De AnzaBlvdHomestead Rd NB Ramps I-280 SB Ramps I-280 Mariani Ave Creek Blvd De AnzaBlvdDe AnzaBlvdDe AnzaBlvdDe AnzaBlvdStevens 21 34 5 360(504)1754(1355)165(669)162(380)1064(1472)65(146)443(317) 573(479) 318(170) 271(168) 336(694) 306(347)518(404)1516(784)235(298)333(519)495(1821)219(372)207(360) 673(680) 296(254) 238(242) 422(1034) 112(461)1246(1856)545(602)552(536)1731(2073)540(617) 0(6) 782(480)395(694)1480(1630)1440(1809)503(326)763(798) 0(1) 626(737)56(113)1293(1271)158(34)755(223)1208(2154)146(85)112(231) 58(36) 89(281) 196(335) 186(66) 21(57) 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 2 4 Background Plus Project Traffic Volumes Project trips, as previously shown on Figure 9, were added to background traffic volumes to obtain background plus project traffic volumes. The background plus project traffic volumes at the study intersections are shown on Figure 11. Background Plus Project Intersection Analysis Intersection levels of service were evaluated against the City of Cupertino standards. The results of the intersection level of service analysis show that all the study intersections would continue to operate at an acceptable level of service ) during both the AM and PM peak hours of traffic under background plus project conditions (see Table 7). Thus, none of the study intersections would be significantly impacted by the project, according to the City of Cupertino significant impact criteria. The intersection level of service calculation sheets are provided in Appendix D. Table 7 Background Plus Project Intersection Levels of Service Peak Incr. In Intersection Hour Crit. V/C AM 37.8 D+ 38.2 D+ 0.0 0.001 PM 39.5 D 40.2 D 1.4 0.010 AM 21.9 C+ 21.8 C+ 0.0 0.004 PM 36.1 D+ 36.6 D+ 1.2 0.008 AM 23.0 C+ 23.3 C 0.5 0.007 PM 21.7 C+ 22.2 C+ 1.5 0.012 AM 37.4 D+ 37.4 D+ 0.0 0.001 PM 39.0 D 39.0 D+ 0.0 0.001 AM 35.9 D+ 35.9 D+ 0.1 0.003 PM 44.6 D 44.6 D 0.0 0.001 Note: *Denotes a CMP designated Intersection With Project Background Conditions No Project N. De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road * LOS LOS Avg. Delay (sec) Incr. in Crit. Delay (sec) Avg. Delay (sec) 2 Study # 1 N. De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard * 3 4 5 N. De Anza Boulevard and I-280 S Ramps * N. De Anza Boulevard and Mariani Avenue N. De Anza Boulevard and I-280 N Ramps * 10931 N. De Anza Boulevard Hotel Figure 11 Background Plus Project Traffic Volumes Cupertino Inverness Way E Homestead Rd N Stelling RdN De Anza BlvdN Blaney AveStevens Creek Blvd N Portal AveS Wolfe RdS Mary AveMariani Ave Pr u n e r i d g e A v e Torre AveVallco Pkwy Miller AveFinch AveHollenbeck AveX = Study Intersection = Site Location LEGEND = AM(PM) Peak-Hour Traffic VolumesXX(XX) 280 85 5 4 3 2 1 De AnzaBlvdHomestead Rd NB Ramps I-280 SB Ramps I-280 Mariani Ave Creek Blvd De AnzaBlvdDe AnzaBlvdDe AnzaBlvdDe AnzaBlvdStevens 21 34 5 363(501)1755(1359)206(670)191(386)1071(1471)67(144)446(337) 580(501) 321(192) 272(167) 375(698) 310(345)521(401)1522(786)280(310)345(529)500(1823)221(370)212(396) 699(708) 307(265) 239(241) 439(1054) 116(459)1260(1868)549(603)553(537)1732(2074)578(617) 0(6) 793(491)406(705)1521(1631)1441(1812)506(344)764(801) 0(1) 626(738)56(113)1316(1256)158(34)755(223)1217(2145)146(85)112(231) 58(36) 89(281) 196(335) 186(66) 21(57) 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 2 6 5. Other Transportation Issues This chapter presents other transportation issues associated with the project. These include an analysis of:  Site Access and On-Site Circulation  Truck and Emergency Vehicle Access and On-Site Circulation  Parking  Intersection Queuing  Potential impacts to transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities Unlike the level of service impact methodology, which is adopted by the City Council, most of the analyses in this chapter are based on professional judgement in accordance with the standards and methods employed by the traffic engineering community. Although operational issues are not considered CEQA impacts, they do describe traffic conditions that are relevant to describing the project environment. Site Access and On-Site Circulation The site access and on-site circulation evaluation is based on the April 19, 2019 site plan prepared by Winkleman Designs (see Figure 2 in Chapter 1). Site access was evaluated to determine the adequacy of the site’s driveways with regard to the following: traffic volume, delays, vehicle queues, geometric design, and sight distance. Figure 2 shows the surface parking spaces, while Figures 12 through 15 show the four below-grade parking levels. On-site vehicular circulation was reviewed in accordance with generally accepted traffic engineering standards and transportation planning principles. Project Driveway Design Vehicular access to the project site would be provided via two limited-access (right-turn only) driveways located on North De Anza Boulevard: one located at the northern end of the project site and one located at the southern end of the project site. Both driveways would provide access to the passenger drop-off/pick-up area adjacent to the hotel lobby entrance, as well as to the underground parking garage. Both driveways would also continue to serve the existing Homestead Square Shopping Center. Based on the site plan, the northern driveway width would be reduced from approximately 40 feet wide to 32 feet 4 inches wide. The southern driveway is a low volume driveway that currently measures 34 feet wide. The project is proposing to narrow the southern driveway to 30 feet wide. As proposed, both driveways would adequately serve two-way traffic as intended. 83 83  $ $ % & ' ( )  >1R6ORSH@  >1R6ORSH@  $                 >1R6ORSH@ 6/23('1 72/$&&3$5.,1*         *$5$*( /(9(/ *$5$*( /(9(/  $     $ (/(& 67$,5 +. (/(9 67$,5 (/ (;+$867 0') )65  $  $   1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.06 1.071.081.091.101.111.121.131.141.151.161.171.181.191.201.21 1.221.231.241.251.261.271.28 1.29 1.30 1.31 1.32 1.33 1.34 1.35 1.36 1.37  *$5$*(3$5.,1*6800$5< *$5$*(/(9(/  *$5$*(/(9(/  *$5$*(/(9(/  *$5$*(/(9(/  *$5$*(727$/   $F 8372 VW )/225 6/23('1 72/63$&(6216/$%         /,1(2)(/(9$7256  $%29(               1.39 1.40 1.41 1.42          1.43 1.44 1.45 1.46 1.47 1.48 1.49 1.50 1.51 1.52 1.53 1.54 1.55    23(172 %(/2:           $F 161 162  6725$*(1° °#° *DUDJH/ 10931 N. De Anza Boulevard Hotel Figure 12 Parking Garage Below-Grade Level 1 Layout 10931 N. De Anza Boulevard Hotel Figure 13 Parking Garage Below-Grade Level 2 Layout 83 83  $   $ % & ' ( )   $  $  $ *$5$*( /(9(/ *$5$*( /(9(/  '2:1 72/ (;+$867 67$,5  $  $               67$,5 2.33 2.34 2.03 2.04 2.05 2.06 2.072.082.092.102.112.122.132.142.152.162.172.182.192.202.21 2.31 2.302.32 2.29 2.28 2.27 2.26 2.25 2.24 83 72/ 2.222.23 1.381.371.361.351.341.33 2.65 2.66 '1 72/ ./$86/$<(56<67(0 $3)25(48$/  $F +. (/(9 (/ 2.43 2.44 2.45 2.46 2.47 2.48 2.49 2.50 2.51 2.52 2.53 2.54 2.55 2.00 2.01 2.021.601.591.581.571.561.551.541.53  $F                              1° °#° *DUDJH/ 10931 N. De Anza Boulevard Hotel Figure 14 Parking Garage Below-Grade Level 3 Layout  $ $ % & ' ( )   $  $  $  $  $ 2.422.412.402.392.38 (;+$867 +. (/(9 67$,5 67$,5 *$5$*( /(9(/ (/ 6/23( 8372/  $F 3.01 3.02 3.032.642.632.622.612.602.592.58  $F                3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.083.093.103.113.123.133.143.153.163.173.183.193.203.213.223.233.243.25 335 3.36 3.37 3.38 3.39 3.40 3.41 3.42 3.43 3.44 3.45 3.46 3.47 3.56 3.57 3.58 3.34 3.33 3.32 3.31 3.30 3.29 3.28 3.27 326 3.08 6/23( '172/ *$5$*( /(9(/ 6/23( 8372/   3.69 3.68   1° °#° *DUDJH/ 10931 N. De Anza Boulevard Hotel Figure 15 Parking Garage Below-Grade Level 4 Layout  $ $ % & ' ( )   $  $  $  $  $ 6(59,&(6$1'6725$*(   +. (;+$867 67$,5 5$038372*/ 6) 81'(5/(9(/6/$% (/(9  0$&+50 (/(9 *$5$*(/(9(/   4.01 4.02 4.03 6725$*( 367 3.553.543.533.523.513.503.493.47 3.48 3.59 3.60 3.61 3.62 3.63 3.64 3.65 3.66 +.(/(9 0$&+50 4.04 4.06 4.05 4.074.084.09    1° °#° *DUDJH/ 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 3 1 Sight Distance There are some existing trees along the project frontage on North De Anza Boulevard; however, the trees do not conflict with a driver’s ability to locate gaps in traffic given their high canopies. The project driveways are free and clear of visual obstructions, thereby ensuring exiting vehicles can see pedestrians on the sidewalks and vehicles and bicycles traveling on North De Anza Boulevard. Any proposed additional landscaping and/or signage should be located in such a way to ensure an unobstructed view for drivers exiting the site. Adequate sight distance (sight distance triangles) should be provided at the driveways on De Anza Boulevard providing access to the project site in accordance with Caltrans standards, as described in the Highway Design Manual (July 2, 2018). Sight distance triangles should be measured approximately 10 feet back from the traveled way. Providing the appropriate sight distance reduces the likelihood of a collision at an intersection or driveway and provides drivers with the ability to locate sufficient gaps in traffic. The minimum acceptable sight distance is often considered the Caltrans stopping sight distance. Sight distance requirements vary depending on the roadway speeds. Given that De Anza Boulevard has a posted speed limit of 40 mph, the Caltrans stopping sight distance is 360 feet (based on a design speed of 45 mph). Thus, a driver must be able to see 360 feet in both directions along De Anza Boulevard in order to stop and avoid a collision. Based on existing observations and the project site plan, both driveways on De Anza Boulevard meet the Caltrans stopping sight distance standard. Project Driveway Operations The project-generated trips that are estimated to use the two driveways are a combined 48 inbound and 36 outbound trips during the AM peak hour, and 48 inbound and 51 outbound trips during the PM peak hour. Although North De Anza Boulevard has high traffic volumes in the southbound direction, based on observed traffic conditions, outbound vehicle queues should rarely exceed 2 or 3 vehicles in length during the peak hours, and no queuing issues are expected to occur. North De Anza Boulevard has a raised median between Homestead Road and the I-280 northbound ramps. The project driveways would provide limited access, allowing only inbound and outbound right turns to and from North De Anza Boulevard. Consequently, outbound vehicles seeking to travel north on North De Anza Boulevard must make a U-turn at the I-280 southbound ramps, while inbound vehicles approaching from the south must make a U-turn at Homestead Road to access the project driveways. Based on the project trip distribution pattern, it is estimated that 12 vehicles during the AM peak hour and 17 vehicles during the PM peak hour would be making a U-turn at the I-280 southbound ramps, while 25 vehicles during the AM peak hour and 26 vehicles during the PM peak hour would be making a U-turn at Homestead Road. An analysis of the left-turn pocket queuing and storage lengths for the southbound left-turn movement at the North De Anza Boulevard/I-280 southbound ramps intersection and the northbound left-turn movement at the North De Anza Boulevard/Homestead Road intersection is presented later in this chapter (see Table 8). On-Site Circulation On-site vehicular circulation was reviewed in accordance with the City of Cupertino Zoning Code and generally accepted traffic engineering standards. The proposed site plan would provide vehicles with adequate connectivity throughout the site and parking areas. The project is proposing one-way access to the porte-cochere/passenger loading area adjacent to the hotel lobby entrance (see comments on Figure 2 in Chapter 1). The City’s standard minimum width for two-way drive aisles is 22 feet where 90-degree parking is provided. This allows sufficient room for vehicles to back out of the parking spaces. According to the 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 3 2 site plan the project would provide eleven 90-degree parking stalls on the ground level: one stall accessible from the southern drive aisle, one handicapped stall along the hotel drive aisle adjacent to the passenger loading area, one stall on the hotel side of the western drive aisle, and eight stalls on the existing shopping center side of the western drive aisle. The four below-grade levels of the parking garage would also contain 90-degree parking stalls. The drive aisles providing access to the surface parking stalls measure between 26 feet and 30 feet wide, while the drive aisles within the parking garage measure between 22 feet and 28 feet wide. Thus, adequate access to all parking stalls would be provided throughout the site. Parking Stall Dimensions According to the site plan, the project proposes standard-size (8.5 feet wide by 18 feet long) parking stalls, which would meet the City’s off-street parking design standard. Van accessibility is provided at five of the seven ADA accessible stall locations. Parking Garage Vehicular Access and Circulation The project site plan shows adequate vehicular circulation within the parking garage on all four below- grade parking levels, with one dead-end aisle on the fourth level at the northeast end (see Figure 15). However, a turnaround would be provided near the end of the dead-end drive aisle, providing vehicles adequate space to turn around if they fail to find a parking space. Vehicular access to the parking garage entrance/exit would be provided via an access ramp located along the western edge of the building, adjacent to the drop-off/pick-up area and the hotel lobby entrance. As previously mentioned, vehicles accessing the garage ramp would only be able to do so from the southern entrance of the main hotel drive aisle. The parking garage was also reviewed for vehicle access using vehicle turning-movement templates. Vehicles accessing the garage would be required to make a 90-degree right turn at the bottom of the ramp. Due to the sharp right turns necessary to access each lower parking level, drivers of larger vehicles would require additional drive aisle width (i.e., would encroach upon the opposing lane) to complete the right-turn movements, resulting in potential conflicts between inbound and outbound vehicles. Vehicles traveling up the ramps from the lower parking levels to exit the garage would not have any difficulty negotiating the left-turn movements onto the ramp. Convex mirrors should be placed on each parking level at appropriate locations to assist drivers with blind turns within the parking garage. Typical engineering standards require garage ramps to have no greater than a 20 percent grade with transition grades of 10 percent. Based on the project plans, the garage entrance/exit ramp comprises a 15 percent slope with transition grades between 5 and 10 percent. Slopes of the interior ramps comprise a grade of 4.3 percent. Parking is shown along the interior ramps. Engineering standards require that consistent ramps with parking are to have no greater than a 6.7 percent grade. Therefore, the proposed interior ramp grade is acceptable and parking along the interior ramps is not expected to be problematic. Bike and Pedestrian On-site Circulation The site plan shows adequate pedestrian circulation throughout the site, as well as between the site and the surrounding pedestrian facilities. The project would construct a continuous sidewalk around the perimeter of the hotel building, except along the west side of the hotel building where landscaping is being proposed. Project plans also show pedestrian access between the parking structure and the on- site uses would be provided via elevators and a stairway on each parking level. The elevators would be centrally located, as well as situated along the north end of the building/garage. The stairways would be located adjacent to the north elevator and in the southwest corner of the building, providing direct access to either the hotel’s main lobby or to an exit corridor. 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 3 3 Bicycle parking would be located adjacent to the main hotel drive aisle at the southwest corner of the building. This would allow bicyclists to enter/leave the project site using the project driveways and connect to the bike lanes on North De Anza Boulevard. Providing convenient bike parking will help create a pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly environment and encourage bicycling by guests and employees. In addition, the inclusion of convenient bike parking complements the bicycle facilities in the vicinity of the project site. Truck Access and Circulation Truck activities (e.g., deliveries and garbage collection) for the project are not expected to occur within the garage due to height and access limitations. The majority of loading and unloading is expected to occur within the proposed freight loading zone at the northwest corner of the hotel building adjacent to the north elevator. The designated loading zone is shown to be 40 feet long by 9 feet wide and would be adequate to serve the hotel. Small delivery vehicles could also access the porte-cochere to make hotel office deliveries. The project plans show the trash room would be located at the northwest corner of the hotel building. Garbage collection activities would occur on-site at this location outside the building. It is assumed that garbage trucks could enter the site from either project driveway on De Anza Boulevard. On-site garbage collection activities would involve rolling the trash bins out of the trash enclosure, collecting the waste material, and returning the bins to the enclosure. Since the bins would be stored in outside trash enclosures, adequate overhead clearance would be available to empty the dumpsters over the truck. The project site plan was reviewed for truck access using truck turning-movement templates for a SU- 30 (single-unit) truck type, which represents small- to medium-sized emergency vehicles, garbage trucks, delivery trucks and moving trucks. Based on the current site plan configuration, SU-30 trucks would have adequate access at both project driveways. As proposed, the 30-foot wide southern project driveway would provide adequate space for trucks (including emergency vehicles) to enter the driveway and vehicles to exit the driveway simultaneously. Figure 16 shows the anticipated clockwise truck circulation pattern based on the proposed site layout. On-site truck circulation would be adequate. Parking Supply The City of Cupertino Zoning Code (Section 19.124.040) states that hotel uses are required to provide one parking stall per room plus one parking stall per employee. The project would construct up to a 156-room hotel with approximately 20 employees on site at any one time (the number of hotel employees was obtained from the April 19, 2019 site plan set, sheet A0.00). This equates to a parking requirement of 176 spaces. According to the April 19, 2019 site plan set, the project would provide a total of 218 parking spaces, with 11 spaces at-grade, 62 spaces on the first below-grade level of the parking garage, 67 spaces on the second below-grade level (not 66 as shown on sheet A2.0-GL1 of the site plan set), 69 spaces on the third below-grade level, and 9 spaces on the fourth below-grade level. Therefore, the proposed parking supply would exceed the City’s parking requirement. Per the California Building Code (CBC) Table 11B-6, seven (7) ADA accessible spaces are required for projects with 201-300 parking spaces. Of the required accessible parking spaces, one van accessible space is required. The plans show seven (7) ADA accessible spaces, with one in the porte-cochere drop-off/pick-up area, three on the first basement parking level, two on the second basement parking level, and one on the third basement parking level. Of the seven ADA spaces, five would be van accessible. Therefore, the project site plan adheres to the CBC accessible parking provisions. CHECKED CITY OF CUPERTINOHEXAGON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 4 North Second Street, Suite 400 San Jose, California 95113 Ph: (408) 971-6100 www.hextrans.com DRAWING NO.DRAWN DATE SCALE 10931 NORTH DE ANZA BOULEVARD HOTEL TURNING TEMPLATE ES T 1.59 5CONCEPTUAL PLAN MAY 2019 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SU-30 TRUCK FIGURE 16 CIRCULATION OF SU-30 TRUCK WITH 30' DRIVEWAY 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 3 5 Bicycle Parking According to the City’s Bicycle Parking Standards (Chapter 19.124, Table 19.124.040(A)), the project is required to provide bicycle parking for the new building at a rate of one bicycle parking space per 20,000 square feet. This equates to a total requirement of 7 bicycle parking spaces, based on a building size of 130,716 square feet (enclosed building area). The provided bicycle parking is also required to be a Class II facility, to which the City defines as:  A facility intended for short-term parking.  A stationary object of which users can lock the frame and both wheels with a user-provided lock.  A facility designed so that the lock is protected from physical assault.  A facility that must accept U-shaped locks and padlocks.  A facility within constant visual range of persons within the adjacent building or located at street floor level. The project site plan shows 8 Class II bicycle parking spaces located at the southwest corner of the project site, between the ADA accessible surface parking space and some proposed landscaping. Therefore, the project site plan would conform with the City’s Bicycle Parking Standards. Queuing Analysis The operations analysis is based on vehicle queuing for high-demand turn movements at the study intersections (see Table 8). The following four (4) left-turn movements were examined as part of the queuing analysis for this project:  Northbound left-turn movement at the North De Anza Boulevard/Homestead Road intersection  Westbound left-turn movement at the North De Anza Boulevard/Homestead Road intersection  Southbound left-turn movement at the North De Anza Boulevard/I-280 Southbound Ramps intersection  Eastbound left-turn movement at the North De Anza Boulevard/I-280 Southbound Ramps intersection The estimated left-turn vehicle queue lengths were compared to the storage lengths of the existing left- turn pockets. The estimated queue lengths based on the Poisson numerical calculations show queuing deficiencies for one of the left-turn pockets studied (see Table 8). Locations where vehicular queues would be deficient are discussed below. N. De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road At the North De Anza Boulevard/Homestead Road intersection, the storage pockets for the westbound left-turn movement consists of two lanes, one approximately 225 feet and the other 425 feet in length, for a total capacity of approximately 650 feet. For analysis purposes, this was averaged to 325 feet per lane, which equates to an available storage of 13 vehicles per lane. The queuing analysis indicates that adequate vehicle storage capacity currently exists to accommodate the 95th percentile vehicle queues that occur during the AM and PM peak hours of traffic. The additional traffic from approved projects in the area is estimated to increase the 95th percentile queue to 350 feet per lane, or 14 vehicles per lane, during the AM peak hour. Thus, the estimated queue length would exceed the available storage by one vehicle per lane under background conditions during the AM peak hour. The addition of project traffic would not increase the 95th percentile vehicle queue during either the AM or PM peak hours. Given that the project would only add a small amount of traffic to the westbound left-turn movement at the North De Anza Boulevard/Homestead Road intersection and would have no effect on the queue length of this turn movement, the project is expected to have a minimal effect on traffic operations at this location. 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 3 6 Table 8 Queuing Analysis Summary Measurement AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM Existing Cycle/Delay 1 (sec)140 140 140 140 135 140 135 140 Volume (vphpl ) 167 238 218 154 266 254 267 305 95th %. Queue (veh/ln.) 11 14 13 10 15 15 15 18 95th %. Queue (ft./ln) 2 275 350 325 250 375 375 375 450 Storage (ft./ ln.) 400 400 325 325 550 550 450 450 Adequate (Y/N) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Existing Plus Project Cycle/Delay 1 (sec)140 140 140 140 135 140 135 140 Volume (vphpl ) 180 252 222 159 276 268 270 309 95th %. Queue (veh/ln.) 12 15 14 10 16 16 16 18 95th %. Queue (ft./ln) 2 300 375 350 250 400 400 400 450 Storage (ft./ ln.) 400 400 325 325 550 550 450 450 Adequate (Y/N) Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Background Cycle/Delay 1 (sec)140 140 140 140 135 140 135 140 Volume (vphpl ) 168 236 219 164 267 255 286 305 95th %. Queue (veh/ln.) 11 14 14 11 15 15 16 18 95th %. Queue (ft./ln) 2 275 350 350 275 375 375 400 450 Storage (ft./ ln.) 400 400 325 325 550 550 450 450 Adequate (Y/N) Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Background Plus Project Cycle/Delay 1 (sec)140 140 140 140 135 140 135 140 Volume (vphpl ) 182 251 223 169 277 269 289 309 95th %. Queue (veh/ln.) 12 15 14 11 16 16 17 18 95th %. Queue (ft./ln) 2 300 375 350 275 400 400 425 450 Storage (ft./ ln.) 400 400 325 325 550 550 450 450 Adequate (Y/N) Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Notes: 1 Vehicle queue calculations based on cycle length for signalized intersections. 2 Assumes 25 Feet Per Vehicle Queued. NBL = northbound left movement; SBL = southbound left movement; EBL = eastbound left movement; WBL = westbound left movement N. De Anza Boulevard & Homestead Road WBL EBL N. De Anza Boulevard & I-280 S Ramps SBLNBL 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 3 7 Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Analysis All new development projects in Cupertino should encourage multi-modal travel, consistent with the goals of the City’s General Plan. It is the goal of the General Plan that all development projects accommodate and encourage the use of non-automobile transportation modes to achieve Cupertino’s mobility goals and reduce travel demand and vehicle miles traveled. The newly adopted Pedestrian Transportation Plan establishes initiatives to foster a safe walking environment that promotes active living and connects to the other modes of transportation within the network. The adopted City Bicycle Transportation Plan establishes goals, policies and actions to make bicycling a daily part of life in Cupertino. In order to further the goals of the City, pedestrian and bicycle facilities should be encouraged with new development projects. Pedestrian Facilities Pedestrian facilities in the study area consist of sidewalks, crosswalks, and pedestrian signals at signalized intersections (see Chapter 2 for details). The project would construct new sidewalks along the north and south sides of the hotel building, connecting to the existing sidewalk along North De Anza Boulevard. The site plan shows the existing sidewalk along North De Anza Boulevard to remain 5 feet wide. The newly constructed sidewalks around the building would measure between approximately 5 feet wide and 10 feet wide. The overall network of sidewalks and crosswalks in the study area has adequate connectivity and provides pedestrians with safe routes to transit services and other points of interests. Note that the project would not remove any pedestrian facilities, nor would it conflict with any adopted plans or policies for new pedestrian facilities. Bicycle Facilities There are existing bicycle facilities in the immediate vicinity of the project site (see Chapter 2 for details). There are also planned bicycle facilities in the study area, including buffered bike lanes along Homestead Road and North De Anza Boulevard. The project would not remove any bicycle facilities, nor would it conflict with any adopted plans or policies for new pedestrian facilities. Transit Services The project site is well-served by VTA bus routes. The closest bus stops are located within a two- minute walk (about 500 feet) to and from the project site, providing access to local bus routes 55 and 81. The new transit trips generate by the project are not expected to create demand in excess of the transit service that is currently provided. An evaluation of the effects of project traffic on transit vehicle delay was completed. The analysis was completed for all transit routes that travel through the study intersections, utilizing information produced by the intersection level of service analysis. The analysis shows that the project would increase the delays to some transit vehicles by a very small amount, while other transit vehicles would be unaffected (see Table 9). The small increases in transit delay experienced by the bus routes that operate within the study area would be imperceptible. The VTA has not established policies or significance criteria related to transit vehicle delay. Therefore, this data is presented for informational purposes. 10931 North De Anza Blvd Hotel – Transportation Impact Analysis June 13, 2019 P a g e | 3 8 Table 9 Transit Delay Analysis Summary Background min / sec Route 55 Northbound AM 62 /3,720 109.0 110.1 1.1 0.03% Northbound PM 67 /4,020 154.4 156.2 1.8 0.04% Southbound AM 60 /3,600 110.2 111.0 0.8 0.02% Southbound PM 60 /3,600 115.7 116.4 0.7 0.02% Route 81 Eastbound AM 118 /7,080 53.2 53.6 0.4 0.01% Eastbound PM 128 /7,680 62.5 63.6 1.1 0.01% Westbound AM 117 /7,020 45.9 46.0 0.1 0.00% Westbound PM 120 /7,200 49.8 49.8 0.0 0.00% Route 23 Eastbound AM 72 /4,320 47.4 47.4 0.0 0.00% Eastbound PM 94 /5,640 74.1 74.4 0.3 0.01% Westbound AM 85 /5,100 46.5 46.7 0.2 0.00% Westbound PM 87 /5,220 45.3 45.4 0.1 0.00% Route 323 Eastbound AM 44 /2,640 47.4 47.4 0.0 0.00% Eastbound PM 57 /3,420 74.1 74.4 0.3 0.01% Westbound AM 47 /2,820 46.5 46.7 0.2 0.01% Westbound PM 52 /3,120 45.3 45.4 0.1 0.00% Notes: 1 Travel time based on the route's first and last stop. Scheduled times were drawn from VTA's Bus Schedule. 2 Represents the total movement delay for all relevant study intersections added together. % ChangeBus Route Approx. Travel Time 1 Background Plus Project Delay in Study Area (sec) 2 Delay in Study Area (sec) 2 Change in Delay (sec) 10931 De Anza Boulevard Hotel TIA Technical Appendices June 13, 2019 Appendix A VTA CMP Guidelines Language Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines 3 October 2014 In order to conform with the CMP, Member Agencies must follow the methodologies described in this document to evaluate the transportation impacts of development projects on the CMP System. In addition, as part of the CMP Land Use Impact Analysis Program, all Member Agencies are required to forward a summary of land use changes and their transportation impacts to VTA on an annual basis. The purpose of collecting land use data on an annual basis is to ensure that development projects that do not meet the threshold for preparing a TIA are evaluated in the CMP process. This land use data will be incorporated into the countywide transportation model maintained by VTA and will be used to monitor conformance with the CMP. Please see the latest version of VTA’s CMP Annual Monitoring and Conformance Requirements, for more information on land use monitoring. 1.4 CMP Transportation Impact Analysis Requirements Member Agencies must follow the methodologies presented in this document to prepare TIAs for land use decisions that impact the CMP System. In order to conform with the CMP, Member Agencies must do the following: 1. Use the VTA TIA Guidelines to evaluate the transportation impacts of all land use decisions within the Member Agency's jurisdiction that are projected to generate 100 or more net new weekday (AM or PM peak hour) or weekend peak hour trips, including both inbound and outbound trips. 2. Submit a copy of the TIA Report to VTA at least 20 calendar days before the development decision or recommendation is scheduled by the Member Agency. Section 2.1 contains further information about when a TIA must be completed. Sections 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 detail the responsibilities of the Member Agency and VTA in meeting the CMP TIA requirements. 1.5 Benefits of CMP Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines The most significant benefit of these Guidelines is that they promote the use of uniform procedures for performing TIAs and evaluating land use decisions on CMP facilities in Santa Clara County. The use of these common procedures helps ensure that the performance of the CMP transportation system is not adversely affected by land use decisions, and that opportunities to minimize impacts and improve the transportation system are identified. Moreover, the use of a common set of Guidelines allows each Member Agency to understand the impacts of development projects in other jurisdictions. Furthermore, it allows a Member Agency to request mitigation measures on its transportation facilities as a result of a project under development in another jurisdiction. The use of a standard set of TIA guidelines is the first step in developing stronger linkages between transportation and land use planning, which is a goal of VTA. Appendix B New Traffic Counts DE ANZA BLVD DE ANZA BLVDHOMESTEAD RDHOMESTEAD RD (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Location:1 DE ANZA BLVD & HOMESTEAD RD AM Wednesday, March 28, 2018Date and Start Time: Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates Peak Hour - All Vehicles Traffic Counts Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Peak Hour:08:00 AM - 09:00 AM Peak 15-Minutes:08:30 AM - 08:45 AM 1,285 2,358 1,326 637 2,2411,853 911 915 0.98 N S EW 0.95 0.93 0.96 0.91 (5,797)(3,376) (3,507) (1,693) (2,506) (2,422) (5,684)(4,993)6520142318 573 435 304 336 271 0 0 1,0582771,74915956HOMESTEAD RD HOMESTEAD RD DE ANZA BLVD DE ANZA BLVD 10 7127N S EW 1675 2 8 25Left Thru Right Total EastboundInterval Start Time Rolling Hour West East South North Pedestrain Crossings U-Turn Westbound Northbound Southbound Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 5 60 178 3 13 1300132803655 622 0 0 3 03,92927392411 7:15 AM 16 95 200 3 23 1540223927793 881 1 1 0 24,7326559249 7:30 AM 22 80 334 4 34 22704239178116 1,146 3 0 5 05,25372443122 7:45 AM 19 58 353 9 26 185089790104153 1,280 5 3 1 15,58092752414 8:00 AM 13 71 448 4 31 283067810111115 1,425 0 1 3 25,76376575414 8:15 AM 12 67 455 8 30 28305478097127 1,402 0 3 1 35,73965763416 8:30 AM 19 73 388 5 36 2400761040127180 1,473 5 0 3 25,75586854014 8:45 AM 12 66 458 3 45 252074730100151 1,463 2 3 4 35,563771003121 9:00 AM 15 76 349 6 43 251256911102155 1,401 4 8 7 55,297771213125 9:15 AM 21 78 382 4 36 237155951117122 1,418 4 0 2 2102925421 9:30 AM 15 52 373 7 27 24724985110795 1,281 5 0 4 288644326 9:45 AM 16 61 302 8 28 24024581012389 1,197 4 3 4 373595218 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right Eastbound U-Turn Westbound Northbound Southbound TotalLeftThruRightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeftThruRightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 1 0 0 0 5 0001310 110000 Lights 274 1,727 157 141 1,041 65271328299422561316 5,677005520 Mediums 2 22 2 1 12 008410112 750010 Total 271 336 304 435 573 318 277 1,749 159 142 1,058 65 5,763005620 DE ANZA BLVD DE ANZA BLVDI280 RAMPS (N)I280 RAMPS (N) (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Location:1 DE ANZA BLVD & I280 RAMPS (N) AM Wednesday, May 2, 2018Date and Start Time: Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates Peak Hour - All Vehicles Traffic Counts Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Peak Hour:08:45 AM - 09:45 AM Peak 15-Minutes:09:30 AM - 09:45 AM 1,912 2,068 1,378 0 1,8482,177 0 893 0.93 N S EW 0.89 0.91 0.96 0.00 (5,610)(5,213) (3,448) () (2,730) () (4,963)(5,284)49800615 0 763 0 0 0 0 0 1,4143951,45300I280 RAMPS (N) I280 RAMPS (N) DE ANZA BLVD DE ANZA BLVD 1 0011N S EW 0000 0 1 92Left Thru Right Total EastboundInterval Start Time Rolling Hour West East South North Pedestrain Crossings U-Turn Westbound Northbound Southbound Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 76 145 0 0 1170000970 674 1 0 0 03,6410144095 7:15 AM 0 61 217 0 0 1870000760 816 4 0 0 04,16001620113 7:30 AM 0 127 262 0 0 2320000590 995 3 0 0 04,56001370178 7:45 AM 0 115 369 0 0 2770000800 1,156 0 0 0 04,78001540161 8:00 AM 0 91 335 0 0 3840000941 1,193 0 0 0 04,85701210167 8:15 AM 0 117 377 0 0 33900001230 1,216 2 0 0 04,91301180142 8:30 AM 0 85 385 0 0 31300001440 1,215 4 0 0 04,97701510137 8:45 AM 0 90 368 0 0 35900001520 1,233 4 0 0 05,13801500114 9:00 AM 0 93 376 0 0 29400002140 1,249 2 0 0 15,12601620110 9:15 AM 0 105 317 0 0 37900002020 1,280 2 0 0 001440133 9:30 AM 0 107 392 0 0 38200001950 1,376 1 0 0 001590141 9:45 AM 0 58 295 0 0 34600002390 1,221 2 0 0 001700113 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right Eastbound U-Turn Westbound Northbound Southbound TotalLeftThruRightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeftThruRightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 1 1 0 0 2 0000304 110000 Lights 385 1,425 0 0 1,379 4920007470606 5,0340000 Mediums 9 27 0 0 33 60001305 930000 Total 0 0 0 763 0 615 395 1,453 0 0 1,414 498 5,1380000 DE ANZA BLVD DE ANZA BLVDI280 RAMPS (S)I280 RAMPS (S) (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Location:2 DE ANZA BLVD & I280 RAMPS (S) AM Wednesday, May 2, 2018Date and Start Time: Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates Peak Hour - All Vehicles Traffic Counts Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Peak Hour:09:00 AM - 10:00 AM Peak 15-Minutes:09:30 AM - 09:45 AM 2,257 1,772 0 1,077 1,7832,507 1,316 0 0.95 N S EW 0.96 0.38 0.86 0.95 (4,975)(5,272) (3) (2,550) (4) (3,320) (4,620)(5,686)005320 0 0 782 0 534 0 0 1,72501,2385450I280 RAMPS (S) I280 RAMPS (S) DE ANZA BLVD DE ANZA BLVD 0 0139N S EW 0058 0 0 72Left Thru Right Total EastboundInterval Start Time Rolling Hour West East South North Pedestrain Crossings U-Turn Westbound Northbound Southbound Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 0 178 0 51 1610352000 529 1 0 0 03,033600420 7:15 AM 0 0 222 0 73 1890930000 686 5 0 1 03,641680410 7:30 AM 0 0 284 0 89 1990781000 800 2 0 1 04,167770720 7:45 AM 0 0 342 0 112 24401240000 1,018 0 2 1 04,5741300660 8:00 AM 0 0 285 0 135 34111500000 1,137 2 0 1 04,8261400850 8:15 AM 0 0 351 0 130 32601410002 1,212 1 0 0 05,0051620991 8:30 AM 0 0 253 0 136 32001950000 1,207 7 0 0 05,11818501180 8:45 AM 0 0 287 0 109 39901840000 1,270 4 0 5 05,32717811120 9:00 AM 0 0 310 0 116 39301520000 1,316 3 0 1 05,35622801170 9:15 AM 0 0 291 0 141 44101320000 1,325 3 0 7 019401260 9:30 AM 0 0 363 0 144 43301310000 1,416 0 0 1 018701580 9:45 AM 0 0 274 0 131 45801190000 1,299 2 0 4 017301440 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right Eastbound U-Turn Westbound Northbound Southbound TotalLeftThruRightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeftThruRightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 2 16 3 3 0002000 260000 Lights 0 1,212 494 516 1,689 05270749000 5,1870000 Mediums 0 24 35 13 33 07031000 1430000 Total 534 0 782 0 0 0 0 1,238 545 532 1,725 0 5,3560000 DE ANZA BLVD DE ANZA BLVDMARIANI AVEMARIANI AVE (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Location:3 DE ANZA BLVD & MARIANI AVE AM Wednesday, May 2, 2018Date and Start Time: Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates Peak Hour - All Vehicles Traffic Counts Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Peak Hour:09:00 AM - 10:00 AM Peak 15-Minutes:09:30 AM - 09:45 AM 2,103 1,660 259 1,009 1,4991,339 403 256 0.93 N S EW 0.93 0.53 0.90 0.81 (4,622)(4,522) (421) (1,952) (499) (833) (4,346)(3,049)1469066589 58 112 21 186 196 0 0 1,202521,2851584MARIANI AVE MARIANI AVE DE ANZA BLVD DE ANZA BLVD 180 4316334N S EW 103312835 28 152 2410Left Thru Right Total EastboundInterval Start Time Rolling Hour West East South North Pedestrain Crossings U-Turn Westbound Northbound Southbound Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 0 6 177 2 34 1220170020 389 0 1 0 12,19855109 7:15 AM 0 4 260 5 25 12802212033 501 6 0 0 52,653271713 7:30 AM 0 7 299 3 44 1350348000 563 1 4 3 33,02139165 7:45 AM 2 7 373 10 67 19103610045 745 0 4 2 123,43526239 8:00 AM 1 14 338 4 73 27903424078 844 4 3 14 133,660493217 8:15 AM 0 9 387 10 106 24803214039 869 3 1 6 193,828962115 8:30 AM 1 10 414 12 127 25304416094 977 3 5 21 214,0439124026 8:45 AM 1 18 320 16 137 2630374701514 970 9 4 27 434,2099224031 9:00 AM 0 15 342 20 167 273053250146 1,012 4 5 23 294,2645113645 9:15 AM 2 14 296 25 187 323045600187 1,084 13 13 55 496224633 9:30 AM 0 11 350 24 153 2670487705333 1,143 7 15 55 534364641 9:45 AM 2 12 297 21 158 3390502402712 1,025 8 10 30 486203027 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right Eastbound U-Turn Westbound Northbound Southbound TotalLeftThruRightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeftThruRightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 7 0 1 5 0000100 140000 Lights 52 1,225 155 659 1,172 145179150151055774 4,08100489 Mediums 0 53 3 5 25 1173666115 1690001 Total 196 186 21 112 58 89 52 1,285 158 665 1,202 146 4,26400490 DE ANZA BLVD DE ANZA BLVDMARIANI AVEMARIANI AVE (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Location:3 DE ANZA BLVD & MARIANI AVE PM Tuesday, May 1, 2018Date and Start Time: Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates Peak Hour - All Vehicles Traffic Counts Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Peak Hour:05:15 PM - 06:15 PM Peak 15-Minutes:05:30 PM - 05:45 PM 2,453 1,957 548 244 1,4092,510 458 157 0.95 N S EW 0.93 0.92 0.95 0.88 (4,922)(7,039) (1,388) (846) (391) (1,290) (3,518)(7,076)8579144281 36 231 57 66 335 0 0 2,145361,2623477MARIANI AVE MARIANI AVE DE ANZA BLVD DE ANZA BLVD 112 68320N S EW 513053 78 34 515Left Thru Right Total EastboundInterval Start Time Rolling Hour West East South North Pedestrain Crossings U-Turn Westbound Northbound Southbound Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 4:00 PM 8 8 213 17 31 4710642004412 958 2 2 47 383,93112361111 4:15 PM 11 9 223 6 38 539047190315 1,004 9 4 25 314,17610371415 4:30 PM 9 8 167 21 49 531059130488 991 4 4 21 294,3231242915 4:45 PM 11 12 203 13 38 516050130396 978 10 3 41 354,61914401013 5:00 PM 18 5 310 19 17 5370952006414 1,203 6 11 25 434,82913641017 5:15 PM 19 7 313 14 54 4790691906412 1,151 5 1 33 334,868973613 5:30 PM 20 11 323 30 32 584087140498 1,287 5 0 14 194,84318731622 5:45 PM 16 9 298 18 34 5320861405510 1,188 6 0 20 304,6631963628 6:00 PM 22 9 328 17 24 550093190636 1,242 3 5 13 254,4751172622 6:15 PM 14 9 235 27 28 51601092006415 1,126 5 3 8 13155789 6:30 PM 13 10 270 22 44 496076180336 1,107 4 3 9 195782412 6:45 PM 7 2 215 14 75 418079400382 1,000 5 7 6 259573311 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right Eastbound U-Turn Westbound Northbound Southbound TotalLeftThruRightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeftThruRightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 2 0 0 0 0020000 40000 Lights 36 1,236 34 142 2,136 85318485623136270 4,784007779 Mediums 0 24 0 2 9 0171610011 800000 Total 335 66 57 231 36 281 36 1,262 34 144 2,145 85 4,868007779 DE ANZA BLVD DE ANZA BLVDSTEVENS CREEK BLVDSTEVENS CREEK BLVD (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Location:4 DE ANZA BLVD & STEVENS CREEK BLVD AM Wednesday, May 2, 2018Date and Start Time: Peak Rolling Hour Flow Rates Peak Hour - All Vehicles Traffic Counts Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles in Crosswalk Peak Hour:08:45 AM - 09:45 AM Peak 15-Minutes:08:45 AM - 09:00 AM 1,040 2,043 1,174 992 2,265882 770 1,332 0.99 N S EW 0.92 0.88 0.94 0.90 (5,348)(2,758) (3,005) (2,253) (3,312) (1,678) (5,917)(2,445)21711320294 673 192 112 422 226 15 10 4924321,51223586STEVENS CREEK BLVD STEVENS CREEK BLVD DE ANZA BLVD DE ANZA BLVD 39 485535N S EW 15332233 15 24 2015Left Thru Right Total EastboundInterval Start Time Rolling Hour West East South North Pedestrain Crossings U-Turn Westbound Northbound Southbound Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-Turn 7:00 AM 7 43 207 5 27 611132511969 557 2 2 2 23,07714272612 7:15 AM 9 40 227 2 19 6722635124104 638 5 4 1 43,7567361920 7:30 AM 17 93 387 8 32 7621545337106 917 3 2 12 34,50312362325 7:45 AM 9 89 382 14 53 10042934232114 965 1 6 8 54,80215422719 8:00 AM 8 84 386 24 100 15434063367173 1,236 4 3 8 45,16626453723 8:15 AM 14 90 431 15 59 19713485599167 1,385 8 6 6 65,22432735231 8:30 AM 25 127 338 9 77 12753981235161 1,216 5 2 13 05,14029655442 8:45 AM 25 115 413 11 86 11814787543171 1,329 7 12 11 45,24927776340 9:00 AM 24 110 358 0 77 13314889259175 1,294 0 12 11 85,11527727346 9:15 AM 21 97 357 0 63 130367124036187 1,301 8 11 16 1327704970 9:30 AM 16 110 384 0 94 111564122854140 1,325 18 11 14 1131755061 9:45 AM 14 92 245 0 107 155237113136178 1,195 9 12 12 939685058 Vehicle Type Left Thru Right Eastbound U-Turn Westbound Northbound Southbound TotalLeftThruRightU-Turn Left Thru RightU-TurnLeftThruRightU-Turn Articulated Trucks 0 2 0 0 6 1201002 140000 Lights 430 1,493 228 315 474 210215407104188644284 5,11010158211 Mediums 2 17 7 5 12 691574298 1250040 Total 226 422 112 192 673 294 432 1,512 235 320 492 217 5,24910158611 Appendix C Lists of Approved Projects Upcoming Projects in Cupertino, March 2018 AH = Admin. Hearing ASA = Arch. and Site Approval; CC = City Council; CUP = Conditional Use Permit; DA = Development Agreemen t; DIR = Director’s Minor Mod.; DP = Development Permit; DRC = Development Review Comm .; ERC = Environmental Review Comm.; EXC = Exception; EXT = Extension; GPA = General Plan Amendment; HC = Housing Comm.; HOC = Heart of the City; LAC = Legislative Action Comm.; M = M odification; MCA = Municipal Code Amendment; PC = Planning Comm; SS = Study Session; TI = Tenant Imp.; TM = Tentative Map; TR = Tree Removals. Project Name Location/Uses Additional Description Tentative Time Frame/Status Main Street (Sandhill Properties ) NW of Tantau/SCB (Mixed Use) 180 room hotel, 260Ks.f.office, up to 130.5Ks.f.retail and 120 apt units. List of retailers: Lazy Dog, Philz Coffee, Eureka!, Alexander’s, Pieology, Rootstock, 85 Degrees, Capezio, Howard’s Shoes, Oren’s Hummus, Panino Giusto, Meet Fresh, Tea Chansii, AT&T, Chef Hung, Target, Meriwest, Pressed Juicery, Orange Theory Apartments estimated to be completed early 2018 Hotel, bar and banquet rooms open Orange Theory open TCO for “The Loft” apartments and the Marriott bar and conference facilities AT&T Wireless 21060 Homestead Rd (Office Bldg) DP, ASA & Height EXC for a 75 foot mono- eucalyptus Application filed 10/26/11. Application on hold at applicant request. Nineteen800 (Rosebowl) N. Wolfe/ Vallco Pkwy (Mixed use) Residential (204 units) and retail (45Ks.f.).Tenants: Vitality Bowls, Kula Sushi, Doppio Zero, The Kebab Shop,, Atlas Health, Nosh Café, Steins Stout Burgers building permits under review Boiling Point, Jin Tea Shop, and Koja Kitchen building permits issued Foothill Live/Work 10121 N Foothill Blvd DP, ASA, Z, TM, and TR to construct 6 townhomes (5 w/ detached work spaces) PC recommended approval on 4/22/14. CC approved on 05/20/14. Completed and finaled Hyatt House (Vallco –behind JC Penney) S-W of I-280 & Wolfe Rd (Hotel/Restaurant/Bar) 148-room hotel with restaurant and bar and conference room space Building permits for site work, podium and hotel issued. Construction started Verizon Wireless 10300 Torre Avenue (Wireless facility) DP, ASA & Height EXC for a new wireless facility Appeal of PC decision denied by CC on 10/06/15. Lease approved by CC on 01/19/16 Facility is active GPA Auth orization City-wide Proposed procedures for process of GPA applications www.cupertino.org/gpaauthorization Project plans posted at: www.cupertino.org/gpaauthorization GPA Authorization for Cupertino Hotel (Goodyear Tires Site) and Cupertino Village Boutique hotel The Oaks GPA Authorization resubmittal withdrawn Cupertino Upcoming Projects March 2018 Page 2 AH = Admin. Hearing ASA = Arch. and Site Approval; CC = City Council; CUP = Conditional Use Permit; DA = Development Agreemen t; DIR = Director’s Minor Mod.; DP = Development Permit; DRC = Development Review Comm .; ERC = Environmental Review Comm.; E XC = Exception; EXT = Extension; GPA = General Plan Amendment; HC = Housing Comm.; HOC = Heart of the City; LAC = Legislative Action Comm.; M = Modification; MCA = Municipal Code Amendment; PC = Planning Comm; SS = Study Session; TCO + Temp Certificate of Occupancy; TI = Tenant Imp.; TM = Tentative Map; TR = Tree Removals. Project Name Location/Uses Additional Description Tentative Time Frame/Status Economic Development Strategic Plan (EDSP) City-wide Research and develop crite ria for converting underutilized retail space to incubator or co-working uses Research the potential to establish a Makers Space/Innovation District Research and develop policies for regulating mobile services (goods and services sold from a truck) in Cupertino. Expected outreach meetings with stakeholders to continue in Spring. Apple NE of Pruneridge & Wolfe Rd (Office/R&D) Replace 2.6Ms.f. with 3.4M s.f.: 2.82M s.f. office, 1,000 seat auditorium, Fitness Center & Parking & 600Ks.f. R&D offices. Phase 1: TCO for A1 wedge levels B2, B1, L1, L2, L3 and L4 Phase 2 construction underway. TCO for Visitor Center, Theater, Tantau Reception, Tantau 9 & 10 Tantau bridge improvements completed, pending Public Works Review Rolling occupancy Winter through Spring 2018 Prelim review North Tantau Site B revision Foothill Apartments 10310 N. Foothill Blvd.Construct 15 apartment units at an existing vacant residentially zoned site. Building permits issued Construction started The Hamptons (HE site) 10900 & 10950 Pruneridge Ave Replace 342 apartment units with 942 apartment units CC approved on 07/05/16 Project on hold by Applicant Marina Plaza (HE site) 10118-10122 Bandley Street 188 apartment units, with approximately 22,600 s.f. of retail, and a 122 room hot el CC approved on 09/06/16 Vallco Special Area Specific Plan (HE site) 10123 N. Vallco Vallco Shopping District, Hyatt Hotel, parking lot Adopt a Specific Plan for the Vallco Special Area Visit www.cupertino.org/vallco and http://envisionvallco.org/for updates 02/05/18, project kickoff meeting 2/6/18 community interviews 02/22/18, EIR scoping meeting 3/13/18, existing conditions presentation Charrettes week of April 9th and May 21st Target Remodel 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd. ASA to allow exterior modification, site and landscape improvements PC approved on 09/27/16 New ASA under review The Forum 23500 Cristo Rey Drive DP and ASA to allow additions and renovations to the existing senior community care facility Draft EIR circulation began 12/13/17 ERC scheduled for 01/18/18 PC to be scheduled for March 2018 and CC April 2018 Project Type Planning Permit File No.Address Cross Street Description Proposed SF/UnitsProposed Use(s)Planning Permit Type Project Status/Planning Notes Commercial 2017-7633 1010 Sunnyvale-Saratoga Rd. E. Remington Dr.Allow construction of a 18,600 sq. ft. commercial building for child care use (240 children)18,600 sq. ft. Child care with 240 children ER SDP Approved by PC on 11/27/17. Building permit active (Plan Check) Commercial 2015-7399 777 Sunnyvale-Saratoga Rd. S. Mathilda Ave.Allow an approximately 11,600 square foot new commercial building (grocery store) on existing commercial site. The project replaces a portion (approx. 7,600 s.f.) of the Orchard Supply Hardware building and storage area. 11,600 sq. ft.Retail SDP Project approved by Zoning Administrator. Project appealed to Planning Commission. Appeal Commercial 2015-7303 795 S. Fair Oaks Ave.E. El Camino Real 182 room, 5-story hotel 182 5-story Hotel rooms ER SDP VAR Under Construction Commercial 2016-7898 830 E. El Camino Real Maria Ln.Demolish an existing single story restaurant (Crazy Buffet) and construct a new 127-unit, four-story hotel with underground parking garage on a 2.56-acre parcel. 127 room Hotel SDP ER Approved by Planning Commission 4/24/17. Commercial 2014-7633 861 E. El Camino Real Wolfe Allow a 162-room hotel (Hampton Inn), including underground parking 162 Room Hotel SDP VAR Approved by City Council on 4/5/16. Mixed Use 2014-7373 (Previous 2013-7528 & 2014-7093) 871 and 895 E. Fremont Ave. E El Camino Real Redevelopment of a 5.49-acre site with 138 residential units (39 townhomes and 99 apartments) plus 6,934 square feet of retail/office use with surface and underground parking. Project involves Rezoning of 895 E. Fremont Ave. from C-1/ECR to R-3/ECR and preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). 39 99 6,934 sq. ft. Townhomes Apartments Retail/Office RZ ER SDP TM Approved by the City Council on 12/13/16. EIR certified by the City Council on 12/13/16.Residential 2016-7293 1008 E. El Camino Real Poplar Rezone the property at 1314-1320 Poplar Ave. from R-1/ECR (Low Density Residential/Precise Plan for El Camino Real) to C-2/ECR (Highway Business Commercial/Precise Plan for El Camino Real) and redevelop former mobile home park (Conversion Impact Report certified and closure approved in January 2016) and existing duplex property comprising a project site of 2.1 acres into a 108-unit, 5-story mixed income (20% of units will be affordable to very low income households) rental housing complex with associated site improvements. 108 Apartments ER RZ SDP PC recommeded approval on 6/26/17. CC approved on 7/25/17. In Building Plan Check review TIA Land Use Data 03/16/2018 TIA Information based on Major Development Update 10931 N De Anza Hotel Approved Project Trips (AM) Intersection Number: 1 Traffix Node Number: 5 Intersection Name: N. De Anza Boulevard & Homestead Road Peak Hour: AM Movements North Approach East Approach South Approach West Approach Scenario:RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total Approved Project Trips Apple Campus 2 0 1 28 3 4 3 41 0 0 0 32 0 112 Hamptons Redevelopment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marina Plaza 2 4 1 0 3 0 0 0 3 4 7 1 25 Sunnyvale ATI 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 Total Approved Trips 2 7 29 3 7 3 41 1 3 4 39 1 140 Intersection Number: 2 Traffix Node Number: 213 Intersection Name: N. De Anza Boulevard & I-280 North Ramps Peak Hour: AM Movements North Approach East Approach South Approach West Approach Scenario:RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total Approved Project Trips Apple Campus 2 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 41 11 0 0 0 57 Hamptons Redevelopment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marina Plaza 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sunnyvale ATI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Approved Trips 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 41 11 0 0 0 57 Intersection Number: 3 Traffix Node Number: 212 Intersection Name: N. De Anza Boulevard & I-280 South Ramps Peak Hour: AM Movements North Approach East Approach South Approach West Approach Scenario:RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total Approved Project Trips Apple Campus 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 14 0 11 0 38 69 Hamptons Redevelopment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marina Plaza 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sunnyvale ATI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Approved Trips 0 1 1 0 0 0 4 14 0 11 0 38 69 Intersection Number: 4 Traffix Node Number: 219 Intersection Name: N. De Anza Boulevard & Mariani Avenue Peak Hour: AM Movements North Approach East Approach South Approach West Approach Scenario:RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total Approved Project Trips Apple Campus 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hamptons Redevelopment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marina Plaza 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 32 Sunnyvale ATI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Approved Trips 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 32 Intersection Number: 5 Traffix Node Number: 211 Intersection Name: N. De Anza Boulevard & Stevens Creek Boulevard Peak Hour: AM Movements North Approach East Approach South Approach West Approach Scenario:RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total Approved Project Trips Apple Campus 2 0 1 11 11 1 5 45 6 0 0 5 0 85 Hamptons Redevelopment 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 27 Marina Plaza 2 4 1 0 3 0 0 0 3 4 7 1 25 Sunnyvale ATI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Approved Trips 2 5 12 11 26 5 45 6 3 4 17 1 137 Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. 10931 N De Anza Hotel Approved Project Trips (PM) Intersection Number: 1 Traffix Node Number: 5 Intersection Name: N. De Anza Boulevard & Homestead Road Peak Hour: PM Movements North Approach East Approach South Approach West Approach Scenario:RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total Approved Project Trips Apple Campus 2 0 0 7 22 25 20 1 1 0 0 8 0 84 Hamptons Redevelopment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marina Plaza -2 -3 -1 0 -3 0 0 0 -3 -2 -4 -1 -19 Sunnyvale ATI 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 5 Total Approved Trips -2 -1 6 22 22 20 1 4 -3 -2 4 -1 70 Intersection Number: 2 Traffix Node Number: 213 Intersection Name: N. De Anza Boulevard & I-280 North Ramps Peak Hour: PM Movements North Approach East Approach South Approach West Approach Scenario:RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total Approved Project Trips Apple Campus 2 18 3 0 1 0 3 0 1 11 0 0 0 37 Hamptons Redevelopment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marina Plaza 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sunnyvale ATI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Approved Trips 18 3 0 1 0 3 0 1 11 0 0 0 37 Intersection Number: 3 Traffix Node Number: 212 Intersection Name: N. De Anza Boulevard & I-280 South Ramps Peak Hour: PM Movements North Approach East Approach South Approach West Approach Scenario:RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total Approved Project Trips Apple Campus 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 12 0 11 0 0 26 Hamptons Redevelopment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marina Plaza 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sunnyvale ATI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Approved Trips 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 12 0 11 0 0 26 Intersection Number: 4 Traffix Node Number: 219 Intersection Name: N. De Anza Boulevard & Mariani Avenue Peak Hour: PM Movements North Approach East Approach South Approach West Approach Scenario:RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total Approved Project Trips Apple Campus 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hamptons Redevelopment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marina Plaza 0 -9 0 0 0 0 0 -15 0 0 0 0 -24 Sunnyvale ATI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Approved Trips 0 -9 0 0 0 0 0 -15 0 0 0 0 -24 Intersection Number: 5 Traffix Node Number: 211 Intersection Name: N. De Anza Boulevard & Stevens Creek Boulevard Peak Hour: PM Movements North Approach East Approach South Approach West Approach Scenario:RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT RT TH LT Total Approved Project Trips Apple Campus 2 0 5 11 11 4 36 12 2 0 0 2 0 83 Hamptons Redevelopment 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 49 Marina Plaza -2 -3 -1 0 -3 0 0 0 -3 -2 -4 -1 -19 Sunnyvale ATI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Approved Trips -2 2 10 11 28 36 12 2 -3 -2 20 -1 113 Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Appendix D Intersection Level of Service Calculations COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-1 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing AM Intersection #5: De Anza Blvd/Homestead Rd Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:65 1058 162*** Lanes: 1 0 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 3/28/2018 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 271*** 2 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 318 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 336 2 Critical V/C: 0.749 1 573*** 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 34.6 0 304 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 37.2 2 435 LOS: D+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 Final Vol:333 1749*** 159 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 28 Mar 2018 << Base Vol: 333 1749 159 162 1058 65 271 336 304 435 573 318 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 333 1749 159 162 1058 65 271 336 304 435 573 318 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 333 1749 159 162 1058 65 271 336 304 435 573 318 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 333 1749 159 162 1058 65 271 336 304 435 573 318 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 333 1749 159 162 1058 65 271 336 304 435 573 318 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 333 1749 159 162 1058 65 271 336 304 435 573 318 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.27 0.73 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2378 1320 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.31 0.09 0.05 0.19 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.17 0.14 0.24 0.24 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 24.3 57.3 57.3 9.6 42.6 42.6 16.1 34.0 34.0 27.0 45.0 45.0 Volume/Cap: 0.61 0.75 0.22 0.75 0.61 0.12 0.75 0.36 0.71 0.71 0.75 0.75 Delay/Veh: 48.0 20.3 14.6 74.4 30.1 25.0 68.5 44.2 54.2 56.9 45.2 45.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 48.0 20.3 14.6 74.4 30.1 25.0 68.5 44.2 54.2 56.9 45.2 45.2 LOS by Move: D C+ B E C C E D D- E+ D D HCM2kAvgQ: 8 17 3 6 11 2 8 5 13 10 15 15 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-2 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing Plus Project AM Intersection #5: De Anza Blvd/Homestead Rd Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:65 1064 162*** Lanes: 1 0 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 3/28/2018 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 271*** 2 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 318 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 336 2 Critical V/C: 0.750 1 573*** 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 34.6 0 306 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 37.5 2 443 LOS: D+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 Final Vol:360 1754*** 165 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 28 Mar 2018 << Base Vol: 333 1749 159 162 1058 65 271 336 304 435 573 318 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 333 1749 159 162 1058 65 271 336 304 435 573 318 Added Vol: 27 5 6 0 6 0 0 0 2 8 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 360 1754 165 162 1064 65 271 336 306 443 573 318 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 360 1754 165 162 1064 65 271 336 306 443 573 318 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 360 1754 165 162 1064 65 271 336 306 443 573 318 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 360 1754 165 162 1064 65 271 336 306 443 573 318 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.27 0.73 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2378 1320 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.31 0.09 0.05 0.19 0.04 0.09 0.09 0.17 0.14 0.24 0.24 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 25.4 57.4 57.4 9.6 41.6 41.6 16.1 33.8 33.8 27.2 44.9 44.9 Volume/Cap: 0.63 0.75 0.23 0.75 0.63 0.13 0.75 0.37 0.72 0.72 0.75 0.75 Delay/Veh: 47.3 20.3 14.6 74.5 31.3 25.9 68.5 44.4 54.9 57.2 45.2 45.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 47.3 20.3 14.6 74.5 31.3 25.9 68.5 44.4 54.9 57.2 45.2 45.2 LOS by Move: D C+ B E C C E D D- E+ D D HCM2kAvgQ: 9 17 3 6 12 2 8 5 13 10 15 15 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-3 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background AM Intersection #5: De Anza Blvd/Homestead Rd Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:67 1065 191*** Lanes: 1 0 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 272*** 2 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 321 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 375 2 Critical V/C: 0.763 1 580*** 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 35.9 0 308 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 37.8 2 438 LOS: D+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 Final Vol:336 1750*** 200 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 336 1750 200 191 1065 67 272 375 308 438 580 321 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 336 1750 200 191 1065 67 272 375 308 438 580 321 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 336 1750 200 191 1065 67 272 375 308 438 580 321 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 336 1750 200 191 1065 67 272 375 308 438 580 321 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 336 1750 200 191 1065 67 272 375 308 438 580 321 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 336 1750 200 191 1065 67 272 375 308 438 580 321 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.27 0.73 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2381 1318 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.31 0.11 0.06 0.19 0.04 0.09 0.10 0.18 0.14 0.24 0.24 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 24.5 56.3 56.3 11.1 42.9 42.9 15.8 33.8 33.8 26.7 44.7 44.7 Volume/Cap: 0.61 0.76 0.28 0.76 0.61 0.12 0.76 0.41 0.73 0.73 0.76 0.76 Delay/Veh: 47.8 21.4 15.8 72.5 29.8 24.8 69.6 45.0 55.2 57.7 45.9 45.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 47.8 21.4 15.8 72.5 29.8 24.8 69.6 45.0 55.2 57.7 45.9 45.9 LOS by Move: D C+ B E C C E D E+ E+ D D HCM2kAvgQ: 8 18 4 6 11 2 8 6 13 10 16 16 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-4 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background Plus Project AM Intersection #5: De Anza Blvd/Homestead Rd Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:67 1071 191*** Lanes: 1 0 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 272*** 2 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 321 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 375 2 Critical V/C: 0.764 1 580*** 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 35.8 0 310 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 38.2 2 446 LOS: D+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 Final Vol:363 1755*** 206 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 336 1750 200 191 1065 67 272 375 308 438 580 321 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 336 1750 200 191 1065 67 272 375 308 438 580 321 Added Vol: 27 5 6 0 6 0 0 0 2 8 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 363 1755 206 191 1071 67 272 375 310 446 580 321 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 363 1755 206 191 1071 67 272 375 310 446 580 321 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 363 1755 206 191 1071 67 272 375 310 446 580 321 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 363 1755 206 191 1071 67 272 375 310 446 580 321 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.27 0.73 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2381 1318 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.31 0.12 0.06 0.19 0.04 0.09 0.10 0.18 0.14 0.24 0.24 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 25.7 56.4 56.4 11.1 41.9 41.9 15.8 33.6 33.6 26.9 44.6 44.6 Volume/Cap: 0.63 0.76 0.29 0.76 0.63 0.13 0.76 0.41 0.74 0.74 0.76 0.76 Delay/Veh: 47.1 21.4 15.8 72.6 31.1 25.7 69.7 45.2 55.9 58.0 46.0 46.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 47.1 21.4 15.8 72.6 31.1 25.7 69.7 45.2 55.9 58.0 46.0 46.0 LOS by Move: D C+ B E C C E D E+ E+ D D HCM2kAvgQ: 9 18 4 6 12 2 8 6 14 10 16 16 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-5 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing AM Intersection #211: De Anza Blvd/Stevens Creek Blvd 1638-211 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:217 492 331*** Lanes: 0 1 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 5/2/2018 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 236*** 2 Cycle Time (sec): 135 0 294 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 422 3 Critical V/C: 0.678 2 673*** 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 35.3 0 112 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 35.5 2 207 LOS: D+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 Final Vol:518 1512*** 235 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 2 May 2018 << Base Vol: 518 1512 235 331 492 217 236 422 112 207 673 294 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 518 1512 235 331 492 217 236 422 112 207 673 294 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 518 1512 235 331 492 217 236 422 112 207 673 294 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 518 1512 235 331 492 217 236 422 112 207 673 294 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 518 1512 235 331 492 217 236 422 112 207 673 294 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 518 1512 235 331 492 217 236 422 112 207 673 294 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.05 0.95 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3895 1702 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.27 0.13 0.11 0.09 0.12 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 42.0 52.8 52.8 20.9 31.7 31.7 14.9 26.1 26.1 23.2 34.4 34.4 Volume/Cap: 0.53 0.68 0.34 0.68 0.37 0.53 0.68 0.38 0.33 0.38 0.68 0.68 Delay/Veh: 27.3 20.3 16.8 51.1 34.5 36.3 63.1 47.6 47.5 50.0 46.7 46.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 27.3 20.3 16.8 51.1 34.5 36.3 63.1 47.6 47.5 50.0 46.7 46.7 LOS by Move: C C+ B D- C- D+ E D D D D D HCM2kAvgQ: 9 14 5 8 5 7 7 5 4 5 12 12 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-6 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing Plus Project AM Intersection #211: De Anza Blvd/Stevens Creek Blvd 1638-211 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:219 495 333*** Lanes: 0 1 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 5/2/2018 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 238*** 2 Cycle Time (sec): 135 0 296 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 422 3 Critical V/C: 0.681 2 673*** 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 35.4 0 112 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 35.6 2 207 LOS: D+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 Final Vol:518 1516*** 235 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 2 May 2018 << Base Vol: 518 1512 235 331 492 217 236 422 112 207 673 294 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 518 1512 235 331 492 217 236 422 112 207 673 294 Added Vol: 0 4 0 2 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 518 1516 235 333 495 219 238 422 112 207 673 296 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 518 1516 235 333 495 219 238 422 112 207 673 296 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 518 1516 235 333 495 219 238 422 112 207 673 296 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 518 1516 235 333 495 219 238 422 112 207 673 296 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.05 0.95 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3887 1710 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.27 0.13 0.11 0.09 0.13 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 41.8 52.7 52.7 21.0 31.8 31.8 15.0 26.1 26.1 23.2 34.3 34.3 Volume/Cap: 0.53 0.68 0.34 0.68 0.37 0.53 0.68 0.38 0.33 0.38 0.68 0.68 Delay/Veh: 27.5 20.4 16.9 51.2 34.4 36.2 63.1 47.6 47.5 50.0 46.8 46.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 27.5 20.4 16.9 51.2 34.4 36.2 63.1 47.6 47.5 50.0 46.8 46.8 LOS by Move: C C+ B D- C- D+ E D D D D D HCM2kAvgQ: 9 14 5 8 5 7 7 5 4 5 13 13 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-7 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background AM Intersection #211: De Anza Blvd/Stevens Creek Blvd 1638-211 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:219 497 343*** Lanes: 0 1 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 237*** 2 Cycle Time (sec): 135 0 305 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 439 3 Critical V/C: 0.691 2 699*** 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 36.0 0 116 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 35.9 2 212 LOS: D+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 Final Vol:521 1518*** 280 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 521 1518 280 343 497 219 237 439 116 212 699 305 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 521 1518 280 343 497 219 237 439 116 212 699 305 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 521 1518 280 343 497 219 237 439 116 212 699 305 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 521 1518 280 343 497 219 237 439 116 212 699 305 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 521 1518 280 343 497 219 237 439 116 212 699 305 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 521 1518 280 343 497 219 237 439 116 212 699 305 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.06 0.94 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3897 1700 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.27 0.16 0.11 0.09 0.13 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 41.7 52.0 52.0 21.3 31.6 31.6 14.7 26.5 26.5 23.2 35.0 35.0 Volume/Cap: 0.54 0.69 0.42 0.69 0.37 0.54 0.69 0.39 0.34 0.39 0.69 0.69 Delay/Veh: 27.7 21.2 18.1 51.2 34.7 36.5 63.9 47.4 47.2 50.1 46.5 46.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 27.7 21.2 18.1 51.2 34.7 36.5 63.9 47.4 47.2 50.1 46.5 46.5 LOS by Move: C C+ B- D- C- D+ E D D D D D HCM2kAvgQ: 9 14 6 8 5 7 7 5 4 5 13 13 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-8 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background Plus Project AM Intersection #211: De Anza Blvd/Stevens Creek Blvd 1638-211 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:221 500 345*** Lanes: 0 1 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 239*** 2 Cycle Time (sec): 135 0 307 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 439 3 Critical V/C: 0.694 2 699*** 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 36.1 0 116 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 35.9 2 212 LOS: D+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 Final Vol:521 1522*** 280 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 521 1518 280 343 497 219 237 439 116 212 699 305 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 521 1518 280 343 497 219 237 439 116 212 699 305 Added Vol: 0 4 0 2 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 521 1522 280 345 500 221 239 439 116 212 699 307 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 521 1522 280 345 500 221 239 439 116 212 699 307 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 521 1522 280 345 500 221 239 439 116 212 699 307 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 521 1522 280 345 500 221 239 439 116 212 699 307 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.05 0.95 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3889 1708 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.27 0.16 0.11 0.09 0.13 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 41.5 52.0 52.0 21.3 31.7 31.7 14.8 26.5 26.5 23.2 35.0 35.0 Volume/Cap: 0.54 0.69 0.42 0.69 0.37 0.54 0.69 0.39 0.34 0.39 0.69 0.69 Delay/Veh: 27.9 21.3 18.1 51.3 34.6 36.4 64.0 47.4 47.2 50.1 46.7 46.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 27.9 21.3 18.1 51.3 34.6 36.4 64.0 47.4 47.2 50.1 46.7 46.7 LOS by Move: C C+ B- D- C- D+ E D D D D D HCM2kAvgQ: 9 14 6 8 5 8 7 5 4 5 13 13 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-9 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing AM Intersection #212: I-280 S Ramps/De Anza Blvd 1637-212 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:0 1725 532*** Lanes: 0 0 3 0 2 Signal=Split Signal=Split Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 5/2/2018 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 534 1 Cycle Time (sec): 135 0 0 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 0 1! Critical V/C: 0.815 0 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 41.9 0 782*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 22.4 0 0 LOS: C+ Lanes: 0 0 5 0 1 Final Vol:0 1238 545*** Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard I-280 S. Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 2 May 2018 << Base Vol: 0 1238 545 532 1725 0 534 0 782 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1238 545 532 1725 0 534 0 782 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1238 545 532 1725 0 534 0 782 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1238 545 532 1725 0 534 0 782 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1238 545 532 1725 0 534 0 782 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1238 545 532 1725 0 534 0 782 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.41 0.00 1.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2460 0 2790 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.13 0.31 0.17 0.30 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 0.0 51.6 51.6 28.0 79.6 0.0 46.4 0.0 46.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.34 0.81 0.81 0.51 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 17.5 29.6 50.0 0.8 0.0 37.7 0.0 43.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 17.5 29.6 50.0 0.8 0.0 37.7 0.0 43.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A B C D A A D+ A D A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 5 19 13 2 0 15 0 22 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-10 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing Plus Project AM Intersection #212: I-280 S Ramps/De Anza Blvd 1637-212 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:0 1731 552*** Lanes: 0 0 3 0 2 Signal=Split Signal=Split Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 5/2/2018 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 540 1 Cycle Time (sec): 135 0 0 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 0 1! Critical V/C: 0.822 0 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 42.4 0 782*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 22.7 0 0 LOS: C+ Lanes: 0 0 5 0 1 Final Vol:0 1246 545*** Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard I-280 S. Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 2 May 2018 << Base Vol: 0 1238 545 532 1725 0 534 0 782 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1238 545 532 1725 0 534 0 782 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 8 0 20 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1246 545 552 1731 0 540 0 782 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1246 545 552 1731 0 540 0 782 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1246 545 552 1731 0 540 0 782 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1246 545 552 1731 0 540 0 782 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.41 0.00 1.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2465 0 2785 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.13 0.31 0.18 0.30 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 0.0 51.1 51.1 28.8 79.9 0.0 46.1 0.0 46.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.35 0.82 0.82 0.51 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 17.9 30.6 49.6 0.7 0.0 38.2 0.0 44.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 17.9 30.6 49.6 0.7 0.0 38.2 0.0 44.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A B C D A A D+ A D A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 5 19 13 1 0 15 0 22 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-11 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background AM Intersection #212: I-280 S Ramps/De Anza Blvd 1637-212 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:0 1726 533*** Lanes: 0 0 3 0 2 Signal=Split Signal=Split Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 572 1 Cycle Time (sec): 135 0 0 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 0 1! Critical V/C: 0.825 0 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 42.4 0 793*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 23.0 0 0 LOS: C+ Lanes: 0 0 5 0 1 Final Vol:0 1252 549*** Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard I-280 S. Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1252 549 533 1726 0 572 0 793 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1252 549 533 1726 0 572 0 793 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1252 549 533 1726 0 572 0 793 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1252 549 533 1726 0 572 0 793 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1252 549 533 1726 0 572 0 793 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1252 549 533 1726 0 572 0 793 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.42 0.00 1.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2483 0 2767 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.13 0.31 0.17 0.30 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 0.0 51.4 51.4 27.7 79.1 0.0 46.9 0.0 46.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.35 0.82 0.82 0.52 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 17.7 30.6 51.0 1.1 0.0 38.1 0.0 43.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 17.7 30.6 51.0 1.1 0.0 38.1 0.0 43.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A B C D A A D+ A D A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 5 19 13 2 0 16 0 22 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-12 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background Plus Project AM Intersection #212: I-280 S Ramps/De Anza Blvd 1637-212 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:0 1732 553*** Lanes: 0 0 3 0 2 Signal=Split Signal=Split Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 578 1 Cycle Time (sec): 135 0 0 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 0 1! Critical V/C: 0.832 0 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 42.9 0 793*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 23.3 0 0 LOS: C Lanes: 0 0 5 0 1 Final Vol:0 1260 549*** Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard I-280 S. Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1252 549 533 1726 0 572 0 793 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1252 549 533 1726 0 572 0 793 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 8 0 20 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1260 549 553 1732 0 578 0 793 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1260 549 553 1732 0 578 0 793 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1260 549 553 1732 0 578 0 793 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1260 549 553 1732 0 578 0 793 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.42 0.00 1.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2488 0 2762 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.13 0.31 0.18 0.30 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 0.0 50.9 50.9 28.5 79.4 0.0 46.6 0.0 46.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.35 0.83 0.83 0.52 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 18.1 31.6 50.6 0.9 0.0 38.6 0.0 44.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 18.1 31.6 50.6 0.9 0.0 38.6 0.0 44.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A B- C D A A D+ A D A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 5 20 13 2 0 16 0 23 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-13 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing AM Intersection #213: I-280 N Ramps/De Anza Blvd 1636-213 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol: 498*** 1414 0 Lanes: 0 1 4 0 0 Signal=Split Signal=Split Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 5/2/2018 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 0 0 Cycle Time (sec): 135 1 615 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 0 0 Critical V/C: 0.740 1! 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 31.1 0 0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 21.9 1 763*** LOS: C+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 Final Vol: 395*** 1453 0 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard I-280 N. Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 2 May 2018 << Base Vol: 395 1453 0 0 1414 498 0 0 0 763 0 615 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 395 1453 0 0 1414 498 0 0 0 763 0 615 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 395 1453 0 0 1414 498 0 0 0 763 0 615 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 395 1453 0 0 1414 498 0 0 0 763 0 615 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 395 1453 0 0 1414 498 0 0 0 763 0 615 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 395 1453 0 0 1414 498 0 0 0 763 0 615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.55 0.00 1.45 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 7600 1750 0 0 0 2719 0 2531 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.24 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 22.9 74.8 0.0 0.0 51.9 51.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 51.2 0.0 51.2 Volume/Cap: 0.74 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.64 Delay/Veh: 51.5 3.2 0.0 0.0 18.4 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.8 0.0 35.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 51.5 3.2 0.0 0.0 18.4 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.8 0.0 35.0 LOS by Move: D- A A A B- C+ A A A D+ A D+ HCM2kAvgQ: 10 3 0 0 8 16 0 0 0 20 0 16 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-14 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing Plus Project AM Intersection #213: I-280 N Ramps/De Anza Blvd 1636-213 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol: 503*** 1440 0 Lanes: 0 1 4 0 0 Signal=Split Signal=Split Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 5/2/2018 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 0 0 Cycle Time (sec): 135 1 626 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 0 0 Critical V/C: 0.744 1! 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 31.0 0 0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 21.8 1 763*** LOS: C+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 Final Vol: 395*** 1480 0 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard I-280 N. Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 2 May 2018 << Base Vol: 395 1453 0 0 1414 498 0 0 0 763 0 615 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 395 1453 0 0 1414 498 0 0 0 763 0 615 Added Vol: 0 27 0 0 26 5 0 0 0 0 0 11 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 395 1480 0 0 1440 503 0 0 0 763 0 626 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 395 1480 0 0 1440 503 0 0 0 763 0 626 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 395 1480 0 0 1440 503 0 0 0 763 0 626 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 395 1480 0 0 1440 503 0 0 0 763 0 626 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.55 0.00 1.45 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 7600 1750 0 0 0 2711 0 2539 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.25 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 22.8 74.9 0.0 0.0 52.2 52.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 51.1 0.0 51.1 Volume/Cap: 0.74 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.65 Delay/Veh: 51.8 3.2 0.0 0.0 18.3 21.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.0 0.0 35.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 51.8 3.2 0.0 0.0 18.3 21.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.0 0.0 35.4 LOS by Move: D- A A A B- C+ A A A D+ A D+ HCM2kAvgQ: 10 3 0 0 8 17 0 0 0 20 0 16 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-15 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background AM Intersection #213: I-280 N Ramps/De Anza Blvd 1636-213 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol: 501*** 1415 0 Lanes: 0 1 4 0 0 Signal=Split Signal=Split Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 0 0 Cycle Time (sec): 135 1 615 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 0 0 Critical V/C: 0.746 1! 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 31.3 0 0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 21.9 1 764*** LOS: C+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 Final Vol: 406*** 1494 0 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard I-280 N. Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 406 1494 0 0 1415 501 0 0 0 764 0 615 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 406 1494 0 0 1415 501 0 0 0 764 0 615 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 406 1494 0 0 1415 501 0 0 0 764 0 615 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 406 1494 0 0 1415 501 0 0 0 764 0 615 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 406 1494 0 0 1415 501 0 0 0 764 0 615 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 406 1494 0 0 1415 501 0 0 0 764 0 615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.55 0.00 1.45 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 7600 1750 0 0 0 2720 0 2530 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.24 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 23.3 75.1 0.0 0.0 51.8 51.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.9 0.0 50.9 Volume/Cap: 0.75 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.65 Delay/Veh: 51.2 3.0 0.0 0.0 18.5 22.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.2 0.0 35.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 51.2 3.0 0.0 0.0 18.5 22.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.2 0.0 35.3 LOS by Move: D- A A A B- C+ A A A D+ A D+ HCM2kAvgQ: 11 3 0 0 8 17 0 0 0 20 0 16 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-16 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background Plus Project AM Intersection #213: I-280 N Ramps/De Anza Blvd 1636-213 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol: 506*** 1441 0 Lanes: 0 1 4 0 0 Signal=Split Signal=Split Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 0 0 Cycle Time (sec): 135 1 626 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 0 0 Critical V/C: 0.750 1! 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 31.3 0 0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 21.8 1 764*** LOS: C+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 Final Vol: 406*** 1521 0 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard I-280 N. Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 10 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 406 1494 0 0 1415 501 0 0 0 764 0 615 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 406 1494 0 0 1415 501 0 0 0 764 0 615 Added Vol: 0 27 0 0 26 5 0 0 0 0 0 11 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 406 1521 0 0 1441 506 0 0 0 764 0 626 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 406 1521 0 0 1441 506 0 0 0 764 0 626 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 406 1521 0 0 1441 506 0 0 0 764 0 626 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 406 1521 0 0 1441 506 0 0 0 764 0 626 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.55 0.00 1.45 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 7600 1750 0 0 0 2712 0 2538 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.25 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 23.2 75.3 0.0 0.0 52.1 52.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.7 0.0 50.7 Volume/Cap: 0.75 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.66 Delay/Veh: 51.6 3.0 0.0 0.0 18.4 22.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.4 0.0 35.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 51.6 3.0 0.0 0.0 18.4 22.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 38.4 0.0 35.7 LOS by Move: D- A A A B- C+ A A A D+ A D+ HCM2kAvgQ: 11 3 0 0 8 17 0 0 0 20 0 16 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-17 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing AM Intersection #219: De Anza Blvd / Mariani Av Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:146 1202 755*** Lanes: 0 1 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 5/2/2018 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 196 2 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 89 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 186*** 0 Critical V/C: 0.637 0 58 1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 43.6 0 21 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 37.4 2 112*** LOS: D+ Lanes: 1 0 3 1 0 Final Vol:56 1285*** 158 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 2 May 2018 << Base Vol: 56 1285 158 755 1202 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 56 1285 158 755 1202 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 56 1285 158 755 1202 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 56 1285 158 755 1202 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 56 1285 158 755 1202 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 56 1285 158 755 1202 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 3.54 0.46 2.00 3.55 0.45 2.00 0.90 0.10 2.00 0.39 0.61 Final Sat.: 1750 6677 821 3150 6686 812 3150 1617 183 3150 710 1090 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.19 0.19 0.24 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.08 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 20.7 42.3 42.3 52.7 74.3 74.3 14.3 25.3 25.3 7.8 18.8 18.8 Volume/Cap: 0.22 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.34 0.34 0.61 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.61 0.61 Delay/Veh: 53.0 42.8 42.8 37.0 18.9 18.9 63.5 57.3 57.3 72.3 61.6 61.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 53.0 42.8 42.8 37.0 18.9 18.9 63.5 57.3 57.3 72.3 61.6 61.6 LOS by Move: D- D D D+ B- B- E E+ E+ E E E HCM2kAvgQ: 2 13 13 16 8 8 6 9 9 4 7 7 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-18 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing Plus Project AM Intersection #219: De Anza Blvd / Mariani Av Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:146 1208 755*** Lanes: 0 1 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 5/2/2018 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 196 2 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 89 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 186*** 0 Critical V/C: 0.638 0 58 1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 43.6 0 21 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 37.4 2 112*** LOS: D+ Lanes: 1 0 3 1 0 Final Vol:56 1293*** 158 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 2 May 2018 << Base Vol: 56 1285 158 755 1202 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 56 1285 158 755 1202 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 Added Vol: 0 8 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 56 1293 158 755 1208 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 56 1293 158 755 1208 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 56 1293 158 755 1208 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 56 1293 158 755 1208 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 3.55 0.45 2.00 3.55 0.45 2.00 0.90 0.10 2.00 0.39 0.61 Final Sat.: 1750 6682 817 3150 6690 809 3150 1617 183 3150 710 1090 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.19 0.19 0.24 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.08 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 20.6 42.4 42.4 52.6 74.4 74.4 14.3 25.2 25.2 7.8 18.7 18.7 Volume/Cap: 0.22 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.34 0.34 0.61 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.61 0.61 Delay/Veh: 53.0 42.8 42.8 37.1 18.8 18.8 63.6 57.4 57.4 72.4 61.7 61.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 53.0 42.8 42.8 37.1 18.8 18.8 63.6 57.4 57.4 72.4 61.7 61.7 LOS by Move: D- D D D+ B- B- E E+ E+ E E E HCM2kAvgQ: 2 13 13 16 8 8 6 9 9 4 7 7 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-19 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background AM Intersection #219: De Anza Blvd / Mariani Av Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:146 1211 755*** Lanes: 0 1 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 196 2 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 89 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 186*** 0 Critical V/C: 0.641 0 58 1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 43.6 0 21 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 37.4 2 112*** LOS: D+ Lanes: 1 0 3 1 0 Final Vol:56 1308*** 158 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 56 1308 158 755 1211 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 56 1308 158 755 1211 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 56 1308 158 755 1211 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 56 1308 158 755 1211 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 56 1308 158 755 1211 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 56 1308 158 755 1211 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 3.55 0.45 2.00 3.55 0.45 2.00 0.90 0.10 2.00 0.39 0.61 Final Sat.: 1750 6690 808 3150 6692 807 3150 1617 183 3150 710 1090 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.24 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.08 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 20.6 42.7 42.7 52.4 74.5 74.5 14.2 25.1 25.1 7.8 18.7 18.7 Volume/Cap: 0.22 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.34 0.34 0.61 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.61 0.61 Delay/Veh: 53.0 42.6 42.6 37.3 18.8 18.8 63.7 57.6 57.6 72.5 61.9 61.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 53.0 42.6 42.6 37.3 18.8 18.8 63.7 57.6 57.6 72.5 61.9 61.9 LOS by Move: D- D D D+ B- B- E E+ E+ E E E HCM2kAvgQ: 2 13 13 16 8 8 6 9 9 4 7 7 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:55 2019 Page 3-20 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background Plus Project AM Intersection #219: De Anza Blvd / Mariani Av Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:146 1217 755*** Lanes: 0 1 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 196 2 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 89 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 186*** 0 Critical V/C: 0.642 0 58 1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 43.6 0 21 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 37.4 2 112*** LOS: D+ Lanes: 1 0 3 1 0 Final Vol:56 1316*** 158 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 56 1308 158 755 1211 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 56 1308 158 755 1211 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 Added Vol: 0 8 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 56 1316 158 755 1217 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 56 1316 158 755 1217 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 56 1316 158 755 1217 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 56 1316 158 755 1217 146 196 186 21 112 58 89 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 3.55 0.45 2.00 3.55 0.45 2.00 0.90 0.10 2.00 0.39 0.61 Final Sat.: 1750 6695 804 3150 6695 803 3150 1617 183 3150 710 1090 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.20 0.20 0.24 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.08 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 20.5 42.9 42.9 52.3 74.6 74.6 14.2 25.1 25.1 7.8 18.6 18.6 Volume/Cap: 0.22 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.34 0.34 0.61 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.61 0.61 Delay/Veh: 53.1 42.6 42.6 37.4 18.7 18.7 63.8 57.6 57.6 72.6 61.9 61.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 53.1 42.6 42.6 37.4 18.7 18.7 63.8 57.6 57.6 72.6 61.9 61.9 LOS by Move: D- D D D+ B- B- E E+ E+ E E E HCM2kAvgQ: 2 13 13 16 8 8 6 10 10 4 7 7 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-1 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing PM Intersection #5: De Anza Blvd/Homestead Rd Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:146 1465 380*** Lanes: 1 0 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 10/12/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 168 2 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 170 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 694 2 Critical V/C: 0.867 1 479 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 55.3 0 345*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 38.7 2 308*** LOS: D+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 Final Vol:475 1349 660*** Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Oct 2016 << 5:15 - 6:15 PM Base Vol: 475 1349 660 380 1465 146 168 694 345 308 479 170 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 475 1349 660 380 1465 146 168 694 345 308 479 170 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 475 1349 660 380 1465 146 168 694 345 308 479 170 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 475 1349 660 380 1465 146 168 694 345 308 479 170 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 475 1349 660 380 1465 146 168 694 345 308 479 170 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 475 1349 660 380 1465 146 168 694 345 308 479 170 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.98 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.46 0.54 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2730 969 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.24 0.38 0.12 0.26 0.08 0.05 0.18 0.20 0.10 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 29.7 60.9 60.9 19.5 50.7 50.7 11.1 31.8 31.8 15.8 36.5 36.5 Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.54 0.87 0.87 0.71 0.23 0.67 0.80 0.87 0.87 0.67 0.67 Delay/Veh: 45.5 14.5 27.8 69.2 25.0 19.5 69.7 56.6 69.9 80.7 48.3 48.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 45.5 14.5 27.8 69.2 25.0 19.5 69.7 56.6 69.9 80.7 48.3 48.3 LOS by Move: D B C E C B- E E+ E F D D HCM2kAvgQ: 12 9 25 12 15 3 5 15 18 8 11 11 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-2 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing Plus Project PM Intersection #5: De Anza Blvd/Homestead Rd Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:146 1472 380*** Lanes: 1 0 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 10/12/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 168 2 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 170 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 694 2 Critical V/C: 0.877 1 479 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 56.6 0 347*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 39.3 2 317*** LOS: D Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 Final Vol:504 1355 669*** Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Oct 2016 << 5:15 - 6:15 PM Base Vol: 475 1349 660 380 1465 146 168 694 345 308 479 170 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 475 1349 660 380 1465 146 168 694 345 308 479 170 Added Vol: 29 6 9 0 7 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 504 1355 669 380 1472 146 168 694 347 317 479 170 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 504 1355 669 380 1472 146 168 694 347 317 479 170 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 504 1355 669 380 1472 146 168 694 347 317 479 170 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 504 1355 669 380 1472 146 168 694 347 317 479 170 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.98 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.46 0.54 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2730 969 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.24 0.38 0.12 0.26 0.08 0.05 0.18 0.20 0.10 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 30.7 61.0 61.0 19.3 49.6 49.6 11.1 31.7 31.7 16.1 36.6 36.6 Volume/Cap: 0.73 0.55 0.88 0.88 0.73 0.24 0.67 0.81 0.88 0.88 0.67 0.67 Delay/Veh: 45.2 14.4 28.7 70.9 26.4 20.4 69.6 57.0 71.6 81.7 48.2 48.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 45.2 14.4 28.7 70.9 26.4 20.4 69.6 57.0 71.6 81.7 48.2 48.2 LOS by Move: D B C E C C+ E E+ E F D D HCM2kAvgQ: 13 9 26 12 16 3 5 15 18 9 11 11 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-3 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background PM Intersection #5: De Anza Blvd/Homestead Rd Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:144 1464 386*** Lanes: 1 0 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 167 2 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 192 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 698 2 Critical V/C: 0.875 1 501 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 56.7 0 343*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 39.5 2 328*** LOS: D Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 Final Vol:472 1353 661*** Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 472 1353 661 386 1464 144 167 698 343 328 501 192 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 472 1353 661 386 1464 144 167 698 343 328 501 192 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 472 1353 661 386 1464 144 167 698 343 328 501 192 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 472 1353 661 386 1464 144 167 698 343 328 501 192 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 472 1353 661 386 1464 144 167 698 343 328 501 192 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 472 1353 661 386 1464 144 167 698 343 328 501 192 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.98 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.43 0.57 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2674 1025 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.15 0.24 0.38 0.12 0.26 0.08 0.05 0.18 0.20 0.10 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 29.5 60.4 60.4 19.6 50.5 50.5 10.6 31.3 31.3 16.7 37.4 37.4 Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.55 0.88 0.88 0.71 0.23 0.70 0.82 0.88 0.88 0.70 0.70 Delay/Veh: 45.8 14.9 29.1 70.1 25.2 19.6 72.2 58.0 71.7 80.6 48.5 48.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 45.8 14.9 29.1 70.1 25.2 19.6 72.2 58.0 71.7 80.6 48.5 48.5 LOS by Move: D B C E C B- E E+ E F D D HCM2kAvgQ: 12 9 26 12 15 3 6 16 18 9 12 12 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-4 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background Plus Project PM Intersection #5: De Anza Blvd/Homestead Rd Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:144 1471 386*** Lanes: 1 0 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 167 2 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 192 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 698 2 Critical V/C: 0.885 1 501 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 58.0 0 345*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 40.2 2 337*** LOS: D Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 Final Vol:501 1359 670*** Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Homestead Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 472 1353 661 386 1464 144 167 698 343 328 501 192 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 472 1353 661 386 1464 144 167 698 343 328 501 192 Added Vol: 29 6 9 0 7 0 0 0 2 9 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 501 1359 670 386 1471 144 167 698 345 337 501 192 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 501 1359 670 386 1471 144 167 698 345 337 501 192 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 501 1359 670 386 1471 144 167 698 345 337 501 192 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 501 1359 670 386 1471 144 167 698 345 337 501 192 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.98 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.43 0.57 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 5700 1750 3150 3800 1750 3150 2674 1025 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.16 0.24 0.38 0.12 0.26 0.08 0.05 0.18 0.20 0.11 0.19 0.19 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 30.5 60.5 60.5 19.4 49.4 49.4 10.6 31.2 31.2 16.9 37.5 37.5 Volume/Cap: 0.73 0.55 0.89 0.89 0.73 0.23 0.70 0.82 0.89 0.89 0.70 0.70 Delay/Veh: 45.5 14.8 30.1 71.9 26.5 20.5 72.0 58.5 73.5 81.7 48.4 48.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 45.5 14.8 30.1 71.9 26.5 20.5 72.0 58.5 73.5 81.7 48.4 48.4 LOS by Move: D B C E C C+ E E+ E F D D HCM2kAvgQ: 13 9 27 13 16 3 6 16 18 9 12 12 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-5 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing PM Intersection #211: De Anza Blvd/Stevens Creek Blvd 1638-211 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:370 1817*** 517 Lanes: 0 1 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 10/12/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 240 2 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 252 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 1034 3 Critical V/C: 0.872 2 680 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 45.5 0 461*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 43.7 2 360*** LOS: D Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 Final Vol: 404*** 780 298 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Oct 2016 << 5:15 - 6:15 PM Base Vol: 404 780 298 517 1817 370 240 1034 461 360 680 252 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 404 780 298 517 1817 370 240 1034 461 360 680 252 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 404 780 298 517 1817 370 240 1034 461 360 680 252 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 404 780 298 517 1817 370 240 1034 461 360 680 252 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 404 780 298 517 1817 370 240 1034 461 360 680 252 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 404 780 298 517 1817 370 240 1034 461 360 680 252 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.30 0.70 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.16 0.84 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 6229 1268 3150 5700 1750 3150 4084 1513 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.14 0.17 0.16 0.29 0.29 0.08 0.18 0.26 0.11 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 20.6 34.3 34.3 33.1 46.8 46.8 19.0 42.3 42.3 18.3 41.6 41.6 Volume/Cap: 0.87 0.56 0.69 0.69 0.87 0.87 0.56 0.60 0.87 0.87 0.56 0.56 Delay/Veh: 68.2 36.7 42.6 41.6 32.8 32.8 58.3 42.3 61.1 77.7 41.9 41.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 68.2 36.7 42.6 41.6 32.8 32.8 58.3 42.3 61.1 77.7 41.9 41.9 LOS by Move: E D+ D D C- C- E+ D E E- D D HCM2kAvgQ: 13 9 12 11 21 21 6 12 22 12 11 11 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-6 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing Plus Project PM Intersection #211: De Anza Blvd/Stevens Creek Blvd 1638-211 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:372 1821*** 519 Lanes: 0 1 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 10/12/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 242 2 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 254 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 1034 3 Critical V/C: 0.873 2 680 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 45.6 0 461*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 43.7 2 360*** LOS: D Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 Final Vol: 404*** 784 298 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Oct 2016 << 5:15 - 6:15 PM Base Vol: 404 780 298 517 1817 370 240 1034 461 360 680 252 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 404 780 298 517 1817 370 240 1034 461 360 680 252 Added Vol: 0 4 0 2 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 404 784 298 519 1821 372 242 1034 461 360 680 254 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 404 784 298 519 1821 372 242 1034 461 360 680 254 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 404 784 298 519 1821 372 242 1034 461 360 680 254 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 404 784 298 519 1821 372 242 1034 461 360 680 254 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.29 0.71 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.15 0.85 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 6226 1272 3150 5700 1750 3150 4075 1522 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.14 0.17 0.16 0.29 0.29 0.08 0.18 0.26 0.11 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 20.6 34.3 34.3 33.2 46.9 46.9 19.1 42.2 42.2 18.3 41.5 41.5 Volume/Cap: 0.87 0.56 0.70 0.70 0.87 0.87 0.56 0.60 0.87 0.87 0.56 0.56 Delay/Veh: 68.3 36.8 42.6 41.6 32.8 32.8 58.3 42.3 61.2 77.9 42.1 42.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 68.3 36.8 42.6 41.6 32.8 32.8 58.3 42.3 61.2 77.9 42.1 42.1 LOS by Move: E D+ D D C- C- E+ D E E- D D HCM2kAvgQ: 13 9 12 11 21 21 6 12 23 12 11 11 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-7 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background PM Intersection #211: De Anza Blvd/Stevens Creek Blvd 1638-211 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:368 1819*** 527 Lanes: 0 1 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 239 2 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 263 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 1054 3 Critical V/C: 0.883 2 708 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 46.9 0 459*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 44.6 2 396*** LOS: D Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 Final Vol: 401*** 782 310 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 401 782 310 527 1819 368 239 1054 459 396 708 263 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 401 782 310 527 1819 368 239 1054 459 396 708 263 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 401 782 310 527 1819 368 239 1054 459 396 708 263 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 401 782 310 527 1819 368 239 1054 459 396 708 263 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 401 782 310 527 1819 368 239 1054 459 396 708 263 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 401 782 310 527 1819 368 239 1054 459 396 708 263 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.30 0.70 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.16 0.84 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 6236 1262 3150 5700 1750 3150 4081 1516 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.14 0.18 0.17 0.29 0.29 0.08 0.18 0.26 0.13 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 20.2 34.2 34.2 32.3 46.3 46.3 18.7 41.6 41.6 19.9 42.8 42.8 Volume/Cap: 0.88 0.56 0.73 0.73 0.88 0.88 0.57 0.62 0.88 0.88 0.57 0.57 Delay/Veh: 70.2 36.9 44.3 43.5 33.8 33.8 58.7 43.1 63.1 77.1 41.3 41.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 70.2 36.9 44.3 43.5 33.8 33.8 58.7 43.1 63.1 77.1 41.3 41.3 LOS by Move: E D+ D D C- C- E+ D E E- D D HCM2kAvgQ: 13 9 13 11 21 21 6 13 23 13 11 11 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-8 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background Plus Project PM Intersection #211: De Anza Blvd/Stevens Creek Blvd 1638-211 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:370 1823*** 529 Lanes: 0 1 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 241 2 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 265 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 1054 3 Critical V/C: 0.884 2 708 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 47.0 0 459*** 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 44.6 2 396*** LOS: D Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 Final Vol: 401*** 786 310 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard Stevens Creek Boulevard Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 401 782 310 527 1819 368 239 1054 459 396 708 263 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 401 782 310 527 1819 368 239 1054 459 396 708 263 Added Vol: 0 4 0 2 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 401 786 310 529 1823 370 241 1054 459 396 708 265 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 401 786 310 529 1823 370 241 1054 459 396 708 265 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 401 786 310 529 1823 370 241 1054 459 396 708 265 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 401 786 310 529 1823 370 241 1054 459 396 708 265 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.95 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.30 0.70 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.15 0.85 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 1750 3150 6233 1265 3150 5700 1750 3150 4073 1524 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.14 0.18 0.17 0.29 0.29 0.08 0.18 0.26 0.13 0.17 0.17 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 20.2 34.1 34.1 32.4 46.3 46.3 18.8 41.6 41.6 19.9 42.7 42.7 Volume/Cap: 0.88 0.57 0.73 0.73 0.88 0.88 0.57 0.62 0.88 0.88 0.57 0.57 Delay/Veh: 70.3 37.0 44.3 43.4 33.8 33.8 58.7 43.2 63.2 77.3 41.4 41.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 70.3 37.0 44.3 43.4 33.8 33.8 58.7 43.2 63.2 77.3 41.4 41.4 LOS by Move: E D+ D D C- C- E+ D E E- D D HCM2kAvgQ: 13 9 13 11 21 21 6 13 23 13 11 11 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-9 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing PM Intersection #212: I-280 S Ramps/De Anza Blvd 1637-212 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:0 2064 508*** Lanes: 0 0 3 0 2 Signal=Split Signal=Split Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 10/12/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 610 1 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 0 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 6*** 1! Critical V/C: 0.876 0 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 48.0 0 480 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 21.4 0 0 LOS: C+ Lanes: 0 0 5 0 1 Final Vol:0 1847 602*** Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard I-280 S. Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Oct 2016 << 5:30 - 6:30 PM Base Vol: 0 1847 602 508 2064 0 610 6 480 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1847 602 508 2064 0 610 6 480 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1847 602 508 2064 0 610 6 480 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1847 602 508 2064 0 610 6 480 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1847 602 508 2064 0 610 6 480 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1847 602 508 2064 0 610 6 480 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.55 0.01 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2719 19 2512 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.19 0.34 0.16 0.36 0.00 0.22 0.31 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 0.0 54.9 54.9 25.8 80.7 0.0 50.3 50.3 50.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.50 0.88 0.88 0.63 0.00 0.62 0.88 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 18.4 34.7 61.3 2.2 0.0 37.8 49.2 35.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 18.4 34.7 61.3 2.2 0.0 37.8 49.2 35.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A B- C- E A A D+ D D+ A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 8 24 12 3 0 15 27 12 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-10 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing Plus Project PM Intersection #212: I-280 S Ramps/De Anza Blvd 1637-212 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:0 2073 536*** Lanes: 0 0 3 0 2 Signal=Split Signal=Split Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 10/12/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 617 1 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 0 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 6*** 1! Critical V/C: 0.888 0 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 49.4 0 480 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 22.0 0 0 LOS: C+ Lanes: 0 0 5 0 1 Final Vol:0 1856 602*** Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard I-280 S. Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Oct 2016 << 5:30 - 6:30 PM Base Vol: 0 1847 602 508 2064 0 610 6 480 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1847 602 508 2064 0 610 6 480 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 9 0 28 9 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1856 602 536 2073 0 617 6 480 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1856 602 536 2073 0 617 6 480 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1856 602 536 2073 0 617 6 480 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1856 602 536 2073 0 617 6 480 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.56 0.01 1.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2724 19 2507 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.20 0.34 0.17 0.36 0.00 0.23 0.32 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 0.0 54.2 54.2 26.8 81.1 0.0 49.9 49.9 49.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.50 0.89 0.89 0.63 0.00 0.63 0.89 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 19.0 36.8 61.4 2.0 0.0 38.2 50.5 36.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 19.0 36.8 61.4 2.0 0.0 38.2 50.5 36.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A B- D+ E A A D+ D D+ A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 8 25 13 3 0 16 27 12 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-11 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background PM Intersection #212: I-280 S Ramps/De Anza Blvd 1637-212 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:0 2065 509*** Lanes: 0 0 3 0 2 Signal=Split Signal=Split Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 610 1 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 0 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 6*** 1! Critical V/C: 0.881 0 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 48.5 0 491 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 21.7 0 0 LOS: C+ Lanes: 0 0 5 0 1 Final Vol:0 1859 603*** Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard I-280 S. Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1859 603 509 2065 0 610 6 491 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1859 603 509 2065 0 610 6 491 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1859 603 509 2065 0 610 6 491 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1859 603 509 2065 0 610 6 491 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1859 603 509 2065 0 610 6 491 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1859 603 509 2065 0 610 6 491 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.55 0.01 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2709 19 2522 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.20 0.34 0.16 0.36 0.00 0.23 0.32 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 0.0 54.8 54.8 25.7 80.5 0.0 50.5 50.5 50.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.50 0.88 0.88 0.63 0.00 0.62 0.88 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 18.5 35.3 62.0 2.4 0.0 37.6 49.4 35.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 18.5 35.3 62.0 2.4 0.0 37.6 49.4 35.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A B- D+ E A A D+ D D+ A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 8 24 12 3 0 15 27 13 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-12 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background Plus Project PM Intersection #212: I-280 S Ramps/De Anza Blvd 1637-212 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:0 2074 537*** Lanes: 0 0 3 0 2 Signal=Split Signal=Split Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 617 1 Cycle Time (sec): 140 0 0 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 6*** 1! Critical V/C: 0.892 0 0 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 49.9 0 491 1 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 22.2 0 0 LOS: C+ Lanes: 0 0 5 0 1 Final Vol:0 1868 603*** Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard I-280 S. Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1859 603 509 2065 0 610 6 491 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1859 603 509 2065 0 610 6 491 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 9 0 28 9 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 1868 603 537 2074 0 617 6 491 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 1868 603 537 2074 0 617 6 491 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1868 603 537 2074 0 617 6 491 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1868 603 537 2074 0 617 6 491 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.92 Lanes: 0.00 5.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.55 0.01 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 9500 1750 3150 5700 0 2714 19 2517 0 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.20 0.34 0.17 0.36 0.00 0.23 0.32 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 0.0 54.1 54.1 26.7 80.8 0.0 50.2 50.2 50.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.51 0.89 0.89 0.63 0.00 0.63 0.89 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 19.2 37.5 62.1 2.2 0.0 38.0 50.8 36.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 19.2 37.5 62.1 2.2 0.0 38.0 50.8 36.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A B- D+ E A A D+ D D+ A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 8 25 13 3 0 16 28 13 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-13 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing PM Intersection #213: I-280 N Ramps/De Anza Blvd 1636-213 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:320 1772*** 0 Lanes: 0 1 4 0 0 Signal=Split Signal=Split Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 10/12/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 0 0 Cycle Time (sec): 140 1 726 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 0 0 Critical V/C: 0.939 1! 1*** 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 50.8 0 0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 35.5 1 798 LOS: D+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 Final Vol: 694*** 1597 0 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard I-280 N. Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Oct 2016 << 5:15 - 6:15 PM Base Vol: 694 1597 0 0 1772 320 0 0 0 798 1 726 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 694 1597 0 0 1772 320 0 0 0 798 1 726 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 694 1597 0 0 1772 320 0 0 0 798 1 726 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 694 1597 0 0 1772 320 0 0 0 798 1 726 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 694 1597 0 0 1772 320 0 0 0 798 1 726 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 694 1597 0 0 1772 320 0 0 0 798 1 726 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.20 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.52 0.01 1.47 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 7959 1437 0 0 0 2665 2 2583 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.44 0.28 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 32.8 66.0 0.0 0.0 33.2 33.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 Volume/Cap: 0.94 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.94 0.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.94 0.61 Delay/Veh: 61.6 11.4 0.0 0.0 50.2 50.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.3 46.7 28.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 61.6 11.4 0.0 0.0 50.2 50.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.3 46.7 28.4 LOS by Move: E B+ A A D D A A A C D C HCM2kAvgQ: 21 10 0 0 22 22 0 0 0 19 38 17 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-14 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing Plus Project PM Intersection #213: I-280 N Ramps/De Anza Blvd 1636-213 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:326 1809*** 0 Lanes: 0 1 4 0 0 Signal=Split Signal=Split Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 10/12/2016 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 0 0 Cycle Time (sec): 140 1 737 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 0 0 Critical V/C: 0.948 1! 1*** 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 51.9 0 0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 36.0 1 798 LOS: D+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 Final Vol: 694*** 1630 0 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard I-280 N. Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 12 Oct 2016 << 5:15 - 6:15 PM Base Vol: 694 1597 0 0 1772 320 0 0 0 798 1 726 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 694 1597 0 0 1772 320 0 0 0 798 1 726 Added Vol: 0 33 0 0 37 6 0 0 0 0 0 11 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 694 1630 0 0 1809 326 0 0 0 798 1 737 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 694 1630 0 0 1809 326 0 0 0 798 1 737 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 694 1630 0 0 1809 326 0 0 0 798 1 737 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 694 1630 0 0 1809 326 0 0 0 798 1 737 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.20 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.51 0.01 1.48 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 7962 1435 0 0 0 2659 2 2589 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.44 0.28 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 32.6 66.1 0.0 0.0 33.6 33.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 64.9 64.9 64.9 Volume/Cap: 0.95 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.95 0.61 Delay/Veh: 63.6 11.4 0.0 0.0 50.8 50.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.4 48.1 28.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 63.6 11.4 0.0 0.0 50.8 50.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.4 48.1 28.6 LOS by Move: E B+ A A D D A A A C D C HCM2kAvgQ: 22 10 0 0 22 22 0 0 0 19 39 17 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-15 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background PM Intersection #213: I-280 N Ramps/De Anza Blvd 1636-213 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:338 1775*** 0 Lanes: 0 1 4 0 0 Signal=Split Signal=Split Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 0 0 Cycle Time (sec): 140 1 727 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 0 0 Critical V/C: 0.947 1! 1*** 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 51.9 0 0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 36.1 1 801 LOS: D+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 Final Vol: 705*** 1598 0 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard I-280 N. Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 705 1598 0 0 1775 338 0 0 0 801 1 727 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 705 1598 0 0 1775 338 0 0 0 801 1 727 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 705 1598 0 0 1775 338 0 0 0 801 1 727 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 705 1598 0 0 1775 338 0 0 0 801 1 727 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 705 1598 0 0 1775 338 0 0 0 801 1 727 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 705 1598 0 0 1775 338 0 0 0 801 1 727 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.16 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.52 0.01 1.47 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 7894 1503 0 0 0 2666 2 2582 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.44 0.28 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 33.1 66.4 0.0 0.0 33.3 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 64.6 64.6 64.6 Volume/Cap: 0.95 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.95 0.61 Delay/Veh: 62.7 11.1 0.0 0.0 51.0 51.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.6 48.1 28.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 62.7 11.1 0.0 0.0 51.0 51.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.6 48.1 28.7 LOS by Move: E B+ A A D- D- A A A C D C HCM2kAvgQ: 22 10 0 0 22 22 0 0 0 19 39 17 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-16 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background Plus Project PM Intersection #213: I-280 N Ramps/De Anza Blvd 1636-213 [CMP 2010] Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:344 1812*** 0 Lanes: 0 1 4 0 0 Signal=Split Signal=Split Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 0 0 Cycle Time (sec): 140 1 738 0 Loss Time (sec): 9 0 0 0 Critical V/C: 0.955 1! 1*** 0 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 53.1 0 0 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 36.6 1 801 LOS: D+ Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 Final Vol: 705*** 1631 0 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Street Name: De Anza Boulevard I-280 N. Ramp Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 0 0 0 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 705 1598 0 0 1775 338 0 0 0 801 1 727 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 705 1598 0 0 1775 338 0 0 0 801 1 727 Added Vol: 0 33 0 0 37 6 0 0 0 0 0 11 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 705 1631 0 0 1812 344 0 0 0 801 1 738 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 705 1631 0 0 1812 344 0 0 0 801 1 738 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 705 1631 0 0 1812 344 0 0 0 801 1 738 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 705 1631 0 0 1812 344 0 0 0 801 1 738 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 1.00 0.92 0.92 1.00 0.95 0.92 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.17 0.83 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.52 0.01 1.47 Final Sat.: 3150 5700 0 0 7897 1499 0 0 0 2660 2 2588 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.22 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.44 0.29 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green Time: 32.8 66.5 0.0 0.0 33.6 33.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 64.5 64.5 64.5 Volume/Cap: 0.95 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.95 0.62 Delay/Veh: 64.7 11.2 0.0 0.0 51.7 51.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.8 49.6 28.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 64.7 11.2 0.0 0.0 51.7 51.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.8 49.6 28.9 LOS by Move: E B+ A A D- D- A A A C D C HCM2kAvgQ: 22 10 0 0 23 23 0 0 0 19 39 17 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-17 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing PM Intersection #219: De Anza Blvd / Mariani Av Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:85 2145*** 223 Lanes: 0 1 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 5/1/2018 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 335*** 2 Cycle Time (sec): 135 0 281 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 66 0 Critical V/C: 0.707 0 36*** 1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 39.4 0 57 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 39.0 2 231 LOS: D+ Lanes: 1 0 3 1 0 Final Vol: 113*** 1262 34 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 1 May 2018 << Base Vol: 113 1262 34 223 2145 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 113 1262 34 223 2145 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 113 1262 34 223 2145 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 113 1262 34 223 2145 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 113 1262 34 223 2145 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 113 1262 34 223 2145 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 3.89 0.11 2.00 3.84 0.16 2.00 0.54 0.46 2.00 0.11 0.89 Final Sat.: 1750 7303 197 3150 7214 286 3150 966 834 3150 204 1596 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.07 0.30 0.30 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 12.3 49.0 49.0 20.1 56.8 56.8 20.3 27.1 27.1 26.8 33.6 33.6 Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.34 0.34 0.37 0.71 0.71 Delay/Veh: 73.2 33.2 33.2 53.4 33.0 33.0 59.4 46.9 46.9 47.1 51.3 51.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 73.2 33.2 33.2 53.4 33.0 33.0 59.4 46.9 46.9 47.1 51.3 51.3 LOS by Move: E C- C- D- C- C- E+ D D D D- D- HCM2kAvgQ: 5 10 10 5 19 19 9 5 5 5 14 14 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-18 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Existing Plus Project PM Intersection #219: De Anza Blvd / Mariani Av Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:85 2154*** 223 Lanes: 0 1 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: 5/1/2018 Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 335*** 2 Cycle Time (sec): 135 0 281 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 66 0 Critical V/C: 0.709 0 36*** 1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 39.4 0 57 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 38.9 2 231 LOS: D+ Lanes: 1 0 3 1 0 Final Vol: 113*** 1271 34 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: >> Count Date: 1 May 2018 << Base Vol: 113 1262 34 223 2145 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 113 1262 34 223 2145 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 Added Vol: 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 113 1271 34 223 2154 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 113 1271 34 223 2154 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 113 1271 34 223 2154 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 113 1271 34 223 2154 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 3.89 0.11 2.00 3.84 0.16 2.00 0.54 0.46 2.00 0.11 0.89 Final Sat.: 1750 7304 195 3150 7215 285 3150 966 834 3150 204 1596 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.07 0.30 0.30 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 12.3 49.2 49.2 20.0 56.9 56.9 20.3 27.0 27.0 26.8 33.6 33.6 Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.34 0.34 0.37 0.71 0.71 Delay/Veh: 73.3 33.2 33.2 53.5 33.0 33.0 59.5 46.9 46.9 47.2 51.5 51.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 73.3 33.2 33.2 53.5 33.0 33.0 59.5 46.9 46.9 47.2 51.5 51.5 LOS by Move: E C- C- D- C- C- E+ D D D D- D- HCM2kAvgQ: 5 10 10 5 19 19 9 5 5 5 14 14 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-19 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background PM Intersection #219: De Anza Blvd / Mariani Av Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:85 2136*** 223 Lanes: 0 1 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 335*** 2 Cycle Time (sec): 135 0 281 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 66 0 Critical V/C: 0.706 0 36*** 1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 39.4 0 57 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 39.0 2 231 LOS: D Lanes: 1 0 3 1 0 Final Vol: 113*** 1247 34 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 113 1247 34 223 2136 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 113 1247 34 223 2136 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 113 1247 34 223 2136 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 113 1247 34 223 2136 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 113 1247 34 223 2136 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 113 1247 34 223 2136 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 3.89 0.11 2.00 3.84 0.16 2.00 0.54 0.46 2.00 0.11 0.89 Final Sat.: 1750 7301 199 3150 7212 287 3150 966 834 3150 204 1596 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.07 0.30 0.30 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 12.3 48.8 48.8 20.2 56.6 56.6 20.3 27.1 27.1 26.9 33.7 33.7 Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.34 0.34 0.37 0.71 0.71 Delay/Veh: 73.0 33.3 33.3 53.3 33.1 33.1 59.3 46.8 46.8 47.1 51.2 51.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 73.0 33.3 33.3 53.3 33.1 33.1 59.3 46.8 46.8 47.1 51.2 51.2 LOS by Move: E C- C- D- C- C- E+ D D D D- D- HCM2kAvgQ: 5 10 10 5 19 19 9 5 5 5 14 14 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. COMPARE Tue Jun 11 17:08:05 2019 Page 3-20 Traffix 8.0.0715 Copyright (c) 2008 Dowling Associates, Inc. Licensed to Hexagon Trans., San Jose De Anza Hotel 10931 S. De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations (Future Volume Alternative) Background Plus Project PM Intersection #219: De Anza Blvd / Mariani Av Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Final Vol:85 2145*** 223 Lanes: 0 1 3 0 2 Signal=Protect Signal=Protect Final Vol: Lanes: Rights=Include Vol Cnt Date: n/a Rights=Include Lanes: Final Vol: 335*** 2 Cycle Time (sec): 135 0 281 0 Loss Time (sec): 12 1 66 0 Critical V/C: 0.707 0 36*** 1 Avg Crit Del (sec/veh): 39.4 0 57 0 Avg Delay (sec/veh): 39.0 2 231 LOS: D+ Lanes: 1 0 3 1 0 Final Vol: 113*** 1256 34 Signal=Protect/Rights=Include Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Min. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Volume Module: Base Vol: 113 1247 34 223 2136 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 113 1247 34 223 2136 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 Added Vol: 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 113 1256 34 223 2145 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 113 1256 34 223 2145 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 113 1256 34 223 2145 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 113 1256 34 223 2145 85 335 66 57 231 36 281 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.92 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.99 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 0.83 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 1.00 3.89 0.11 2.00 3.84 0.16 2.00 0.54 0.46 2.00 0.11 0.89 Final Sat.: 1750 7302 198 3150 7214 286 3150 966 834 3150 204 1596 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------| Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.17 0.17 0.07 0.30 0.30 0.11 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.18 0.18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green Time: 12.3 48.9 48.9 20.1 56.8 56.8 20.3 27.1 27.1 26.8 33.6 33.6 Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.34 0.34 0.37 0.71 0.71 Delay/Veh: 73.2 33.3 33.3 53.3 33.0 33.0 59.4 46.9 46.9 47.1 51.3 51.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 73.2 33.3 33.3 53.3 33.0 33.0 59.4 46.9 46.9 47.1 51.3 51.3 LOS by Move: E C- C- D- C- C- E+ D D D D- D- HCM2kAvgQ: 5 10 10 5 19 19 9 5 5 5 14 14 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ........................................................................................................................ APPENDIX E: PHASE I AND PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS ........................................................................................................................ August 8, 2018 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Property Information: 10931 North De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California 95014 AEI Project No. 392233 Prepared For: De Anza Properties / Sandridge Partners 960 North San Antonio Road, Suite 114 Los Altos, California 94022 Prepared By: AEI Consultants 8885 Rio San Diego Drive Suite 257 San Diego, California 92108 AEI Main Contact: M. Evans Howell ehowell@aeiconsultants.com (650) 303-3856 August 8, 2018 Brian Tjader De Anza Properties / Sandridge Partners 960 North San Antonio Road, Suite 114 Los Altos, California 94022 Subject: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment 10931 North De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, California 95014 AEI Project No. 392233 Dear Brian Tjader: AEI Consultants is pleased to provide the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the above referenced property. This assessment was authorized and performed in accordance with the scope of services engaged. We appreciate the opportunity to provide services to you. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we can assist you in any other matter, please contact me at (650) 303-3856 or ehowell@aeiconsultants.com. Sincerely, M. Evans Howell, MS, REPA Executive Vice President AEI Consultants PROJECT SUMMARY 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California 95014 AEI Project No. 392233 Report Section REC CREC HREC OEC Recommended Action 1.0 Introduction None 2.0 Site and Vicinity Description None 3.0 Historical Review of Site and Vicinity Further Assessment 4.0 Regulatory Agency Records Review See above 5.0 Regulatory Database Records Review See above 6.0 Interviews and User Provided Information None 7.0 Site Reconnaissance See above 8.1 Asbestos-Containing Building Materials Implement O&M Plan 8.2 Lead-Based Paint None 8.3 Radon None 8.4 Mold/Indoor Air Quality Issues None Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Conclusions, Opinions, and Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 1.1 Scope of Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 1.2 Additional Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 1.3 Significant Assumptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 1.4 Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 1.5 Limiting Conditions/Deviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 1.6 Data Failure and Data Gaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 1.7 Reliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.0 SITE AND VICINITY DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.1 Site Location and Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.2 On-Site Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.3 Site and Vicinity Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.4 Physical Setting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 3.0 HISTORICAL REVIEW OF SITE AND VICINITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 3.1 Aerial Photographs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 3.2 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 3.3 City Directories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.4 Historical Topographic Maps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.5 Chain of Title . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 4.0 REGULATORY AGENCY RECORDS REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 4.1 Local Environmental Health Department and/or State Environmental Agency . . . . . . . 21 4.2 Fire Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 4.3 Building Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 4.4 Planning Department . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 4.5 Assessor's Office . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 4.6 Other Agencies Searched . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 4.7 Oil and Gas Wells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 4.8 Oil and Gas Pipelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 5.0 REGULATORY DATABASE RECORDS REVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 5.1 Records Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 5.2 Vapor Migration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 6.0 INTERVIEWS AND USER PROVIDED INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 6.1 Interviews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 6.2 User Provided Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 6.3 Previous Reports and Other Provided Documentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 6.4 Environmental Lien Search . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 7.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 7.1 Subject Property Reconnaissance Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 7.2 Adjacent Property Reconnaissance Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 8.0 NON-ASTM SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 8.1 Asbestos-Containing Building Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 8.2 Lead-Based Paint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 8.3 Radon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 2 8.4 Mold/Indoor Air Quality Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 9.0 SIGNATURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 10.0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 3 TABLE OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A: FIGURES APPENDIX B: PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDIX C: REGULATORY DATABASE APPENDIX D: HISTORICAL SOURCES APPENDIX E: REGULATORY AGENCY RECORDS APPENDIX F: QUALIFICATIONS APPENDIX G: LIST OF COMMONLY USED ABBREVIATIONS Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AEI Consultants (AEI) was retained by De Anza Properties / Sandridge Partners to conduct a Phase I ESA in conformance with AEI's contract and the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 and the EPA Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312) for the property located at 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California (the "subject property"). Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Sections 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6 of this report. Pertinent subject property information is noted below: PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address(es)10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California 95014 Property ID (APN or Block/Lot)326-10-061 Location Western side of North De Anza Boulevard Property Type Auto Repair SITE AND BUILDING INFORMATION Approximate Site Acreage/Source 1.23/Santa Clara County Assessor Number of Buildings One Building Construction Date(s)1971-1972 Building Square Footage (SF)/Source 8,323/City of Cupertino Number of Floors/Stories One + mezzanine Basement or Subgrade Area(s)None identified Number of Units One Additional Improvements Asphalt-paved parking/drive areas, concrete-paved walkways, landscaped areas and a building enclosure with drums and a waste oil AST On-site Occupant(s)Goodyear Tire & Service Center Current On-site Operations/Use General automotive services, general office uses and routine facility maintenance Current Use of Hazardous Substances Yes; refer to Section 7.1 REGULATORY INFORMATION Regulatory Database Listing(s)HIST UST, CUPA Listings, CERS, CERS Hazardous Waste, HAZNET, FINDS Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 5 Subject Property Address/ Unit Tenant Use 10931 North De Anza Boulevard Goodyear Tire & Service Center Goodyear Tire & Service Center has occupied the subject property building since construction in 1971-1972. The western side of the building contains a total of eight (8) automotive service bays. Seven (7) below floor hydraulic lifts and one alignment rack are located in the service bays. Floor drains were observed in multiple locations in the service area, and are reportedly connected to a clarifier adjacent to the northern side of the building. Automotive parts, benches and tool storage areas are located throughout the service area. Multiple 55-gallon drums containing oil, automatic transmission fluid, used oil filters, absorbent, waste antifreeze and waste brake fluid are located in the southern portion of the shop. A floor sink and restroom are located immediately adjacent to the east of the service area. The floor sink contains a drain, and is reportedly used for the disposal of oily water from washing the routine washing of the shop floor. The area immediately adjacent to the east of the service area contains a tire storage area on the ground floor and on a mezzanine level. Two compressors, motor oil drums and one 120-gallon new oil AST are located at the southern end of the shop. The northeastern portion of the subject property building contains a lobby/customer lounge, offices and restrooms. A small enclosure adjacent to the southern side of the building contains empty drums, one 55-gallon drum of antifreeze and one 120-gallon AST of waste oil. The remaining areas of the subject property consist of paved parking/drive areas and landscaped areas. A chronological summary of historical subject property information is as follows: Date Range Subject Property Description and Use (Historical Addresses)Source(s) Prior to 1939 Unknown use/Data failure; refer to Section 1.6.1 Aerial photographs, city directories and agency records 1939-1968 Agricultural land Aerial photographs 1971-1972-Present Current building constructed for Goodyear Tire & Service Center/automotive service operations Aerial photographs, city directories, interviews, agency records, site observation Refer to Sections 4.0 and 7.1 for further discussion of environmental concerns associated with the current and historical use of the subject property for automotive service operations. Refer to Section 3.1 for further discussion of historical agricultural use. The immediately surrounding properties consist of the following: Direction Tenant/Use (Address)Regulatory Database Listing(s) North Star One Credit Union, Monley Donuts and Max Real Financial (10991 North De Anza Boulevard) and Rite Aid (20572 Homestead Road) RCRA-CESQG, CUPA Listings, HAZNET, CERS Hazardous Waste, CIWQS East North De Anza Boulevard followed by: Aviare Apartments (20415 Via Paviso) LUST, Historic LUST, Historic Cortese, CERS Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 6 Direction Tenant/Use (Address)Regulatory Database Listing(s) South Cupertino Hotel (10889 North De Anza Boulevard) None identified West Ulta Beauty (20580 Homestead Road) and Stein Mart (20600 Homestead Road) CERS Hazardous Waste, CERS, RCRA-CESQG, FINDS, ECHO, CUPA Listings, HAZNET If the surrounding properties are listed in the regulatory database, please refer to Section 5.1 for discussion. FINDINGS Recognized Environmental Condition (REC)is defined by the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. • Review of County of Santa Clara and City of Cupertino records and the Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) regulatory database report indicated that the subject property has been utilized as an automotive service facility by Goodyear Tire & Service Center since 1971-1972. The HIST UST database in the EDR regulatory database indicated that one 200-gallon waste oil UST was installed at the subject property in 1973. The Santa Clara County Fire Department file indicated that one 200-gallon waste oil UST was located at the subject property, as discussed in a correspondence file. However, no additional information regarding the UST was included in the agency files, including location, sampling data or removal activities. Based on this information, the waste oil UST represents a REC to the subject property at this time. • The subject property is equipped with seven (7) below-ground hydraulic lifts. Six (6) of the lifts were presumably installed in 1971-1972, when the building was constructed, and the seventh lift was installed in 2015 and replaced an older lift (presumably installed in 1971-1972). No information regarding sampling activities during the removal and replacement of the seventh lift was made available to AEI. Based on the pre-1977 installation of the lifts, the potential exists that the hydraulic fluid within the lift systems previously contained PCBs. Due to the age of the equipment, the integrity of the equipment is unknown; therefore, the potential exists that a release of hydraulic fluid which may have contained PCBs has occurred on site. Therefore, the presence of the hydraulic lifts and the lack of sampling data for the removed hydraulic lift represents a REC to the subject property at this time. • A four-chambered clarifier was observed adjacent to the north of the subject property building. The age of the clarifier system is unknown; however, likely installed during the construction of the building (1971-1972). Clarifiers are used to treat waste water streams. Clarifiers can act as conduits to the subsurface of properties and when utilized to treat waste water streams, can act as preferential pathways for contaminants in the waste streams. Additionally, the structural integrity of clarifiers and their associated piping can become compromised over time, especially when located in areas prone to high seismic activity. AEI observed an oily liquid at the bottom of the chambers in the clarifier. Mr. Erik Bergman, Assistant Manager of Goodyear, was unaware of any maintenance of the clarifier. The shop sink and floor drains within the shop reportedly Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 7 discharge to the clarifier system. Evidence of oily liquid was observed within some of the floor drains within the shop. Additionally, AEI observed staining and spillage from apparent routine automotive service operations, transfer of waste fluids, filters, etc. from smaller containers to drums and the waste oil AST throughout the shop floor. The shop floor is routinely washed with soap and water, and the oily water is discharged to the drain in the floor sink or in the toilet in the adjacent shop restroom. According to a review of records at the Santa Clara County Environmental Health Department (SCCEHD), the subject property has received violations in 1997, 2000, 2008, and 2017 for the improper storage or hazardous substances and evidence of spillage of waste oil and anti-freeze. Based on the use of hazardous materials on site, evidence of staining observed during the site reconnaissance, the aforementioned violations, the presence of floor drains, and the length of time the clarifier system has likely been in place (47 years), the current and historical use of the subject property for automotive repair purposes represents a REC to the subject property at this time. Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition (CREC)is defined by the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 as a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls. • AEI did not identify evidence of CRECs during the course of this assessment. Historical Recognized Environmental Condition (HREC)is defined by the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 as a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. • AEI did not identify evidence of HRECs during the course of this assessment. Other Environmental Considerations (OEC)warrant discussion, but do not qualify as RECs as defined by the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13. These include, but are not limited to, de minimis conditions and/or environmental considerations such as the presence of ACMs, LBP, radon, mold, and lead in drinking water, which can affect the liabilities and financial obligations of the client, the health and safety of site occupants, and the value and marketability of the subject property. • Due to the age of the subject property building, there is a potential that ACMs are present. The observed suspect ACMs at the subject property were in good condition at the time of the site reconnaissance and are not expected to pose a health and safety concern to the occupants of the subject property at this time. Based on the potential presence of ACMs, AEI recommends the implementation of an O&M Plan which stipulates that the repair and maintenance of damaged materials should be performed to protect the health and safety of the building occupants. In the event that building renovation or demolition activities are planned, a thorough asbestos survey to identify asbestos-containing building materials is required in accordance with the EPA NESHAP 40 Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 8 CFR Part 61 prior to demolition or renovation activities that may disturb suspect ACMs. • Due to the age of the subject property building, there is a potential that LBP is present. All observed painted surfaces were in good condition and are not expected to pose a health and safety concern to the occupants of the subject property at this time. Local regulations may apply to LBP in association with building demolition/renovations and worker/occupant protection. Actual material samples would need to be collected or an x-ray fluorescence (XRF) survey performed in order to determine if LBP is present. It should be noted that construction activities that disturb materials or paints containing any amount of lead may be subject to certain requirements of the OSHA lead standard contained in 29 CFR 1910.1025 and 1926.62. • The subject property is equipped with one (1) 120-gallon new oil and one (1) 120-gallon waste oil AST located in the store room and adjacent to the building (See Figure 2). Minor surface staining and spillage of oil was observed on the concrete floor adjacent to the above noted ASTs. However, no floor drains, significant cracking in the floor or other subsurface entry points were observed in the area of surface staining and minor oil spillage. No secondary containment was in place. Based on the amount and nature of staining, the new oil and waste oil ASTs are not expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time; however, housekeeping should be improved to prevent further staining and spills. In addition, as a best management practice, secondary containment should be provided for fuel ASTs. CONCLUSIONS, OPINIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS We have performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 and the EPA Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312) of 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California, the subject property. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Sections 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6 of this report. AEI did not identify evidence of RECs or CRECs in connection with the property except for those previously identified in the Findings section. AEI recommends further assessment of the subject property. Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 9 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report documents the methods and findings of the Phase I ESA performed in conformance with AEI's contract and scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 and the EPA Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312) for the property located at 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California (Appendix A: Figures and Appendix B: Property Photographs). 1.1 SCOPE OF WORK The purpose of the Phase I ESA is to assist the client in identifying potential RECs, in accordance with ASTM E1527-13, associated with the presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products, their use, storage, and disposal at and in the vicinity of the subject property. Property assessment activities focused on: 1) a review of federal, state, tribal, and local databases that identify and describe underground fuel tank sites, leaking underground fuel tank sites, hazardous waste generation sites, and hazardous waste storage and disposal facility sites within the ASTM approximate minimum search distance; 2) a property and surrounding site reconnaissance, and interviews with the past and present owners and current occupants and operators to identify potential environmental contamination; and 3) a review of historical sources to help ascertain previous land use at the site and in the surrounding area. 1.2 ADDITIONAL SERVICES Other Environmental Considerations such as ACMs, LBP, lead in drinking water, radon, mold, and wetlands can result in business environmental risks for property owners which may disrupt current or planned operations or cash flow and are generally beyond the scope of a Phase I assessment as defined by ASTM E1527-13. Based upon the agreed-on scope of services this ESA did not include subsurface or other invasive assessments, business environmental risks, or other services not specifically identified and discussed herein. 1.3 SIGNIFICANT ASSUMPTIONS The following assumptions are made by AEI in this report. AEI relied on information derived from secondary sources including governmental agencies, the client, designated representatives of the client, property contact, property owner, property owner representatives, computer databases, and personal interviews. AEI has reviewed and evaluated the thoroughness and reliability of the information derived from secondary sources including government agencies, the client, designated representatives of the client, property contact, property owner, property owner representatives, computer databases, or personal interviews. It appears that all information obtained from outside sources and reviewed for this assessment is thorough and reliable. However, AEI cannot guarantee the thoroughness or reliability of this information. Groundwater flow, unless otherwise specified by on-site well data or well data from the subject property or nearby sites, is inferred from contour information depicted on the USGS topographic maps. AEI assumes the property has been correctly and accurately identified by the client, designated representative of the client, property contact, property owner, and property owner's representatives. Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 10 1.4 LIMITATIONS Property conditions, as well as local, state, tribal, and federal regulations can change significantly over time. Therefore, the recommendations and conclusions presented as a result of this assessment apply strictly to the environmental regulations and property conditions existing at the time the assessment was performed. Available information has been analyzed using currently accepted assessment techniques and it is believed that the inferences made are reasonably representative of the property. AEI makes no warranty, expressed or implied, except that the services have been performed in accordance with generally accepted environmental property assessment practices applicable at the time and location of the assessment. Considerations identified by ASTM as beyond the scope of a Phase I ESA that may affect business environmental risk at a given property include the following: ACMs, radon, LBP, lead in drinking water, wetlands, regulatory compliance, cultural and historical resources, industrial hygiene, health and safety, ecological resources, endangered species, indoor air quality, mold, and high voltage lines. These environmental issues or conditions may warrant assessment based on the type of the property transaction; however, they are considered non-scope issues under ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13. If requested by the client, these non-scope issues are discussed herein. Otherwise, the purpose of this assessment is solely to satisfy one of the requirements for qualification of the innocent landowner defense, contiguous property owner or bona fide prospective purchaser under CERCLA. ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 and the United States EPA Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312) constitute the "all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice" as defined in: 1. 42 U.S.C. § 9601(35)(B), referenced in the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13. 2. Sections 101(35)(B) (ii) and (iii) of CERCLA and referenced in the EPA Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312). 3. 42 U.S.C. § 9601(40) and 42 U.S.C. § 9607(q). The Phase I ESA is not, and should not be construed as, a warranty or guarantee about the presence or absence of environmental contaminants that may affect the property. Neither is the assessment intended to assure clear title to the property in question. The sole purpose of assessment into property title records is to ascertain a historical basis of prior land use. All findings, conclusions, and recommendations stated in this report are based upon facts, circumstances, and industry-accepted procedures for such services as they existed at the time this report was prepared (i.e., federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations, market conditions, economic conditions, political climate, and other applicable matters). All findings, conclusions, and recommendations stated in this report are based on the data and information provided, current subject property use, and observations and conditions that existed on the date and time of the property reconnaissance. Responses received from local, state, or federal agencies or other secondary sources of information after the issuance of this report may change certain facts, findings, conclusions, or circumstances to the report. A change in any fact, circumstance, or industry-accepted procedure upon which this report was based may adversely affect the findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this report. Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 11 AEI's limited radon screening, if included, is intended to provide a preliminary screening to evaluate the potential presence of elevated radon concentrations at the site. The proposed scope is not intended to define the full extent of the presence of radon at the subject property. As such, the results should be used for lending purposes only. The recommendations and conclusions presented as a result of the limited preliminary radon screening apply strictly to the property conditions existing at the time the sampling was performed. The sample analytical results are only valid for the time, place, and condition of the site at the time of collection and AEI does not warrant that the results will be repeatable or are representative of past or future conditions. 1.5 LIMITING CONDITIONS/DEVIATIONS The performance of this Phase I ESA was limited by the following: • While additional assessments may have been conducted on the subject property, these documents must be provided for AEI's review in order for the information to be summarized/included in this Phase I ESA. Please refer to Section 6.3 for a summary of previous reports and other documentation provided to AEI during this assessment. • The User did not complete the ASTM User Questionnaire or provide the User information to AEI. AEI assumes that qualification for the LLPs is being established by the User in documentation outside of this assessment. 1.6 DATA FAILURE AND DATA GAPS According to ASTM E1527-13, data gaps occur when the Environmental Professional is unable to obtain information required by the Standard, despite good faith efforts to gather such information. Pursuant to ASTM E1527-13, only significant data gaps, defined as those that affect the ability of the Environmental Professional to identify RECs, need to be documented. Data failure is one type of data gap. According to ASTM E1527-13, data failure occurs when all of the standard historical sources that are reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful have been reviewed and yet the objectives have not been met. Pursuant to ASTM E1527-13, historical sources are required to document property use back to the property's first developed use or back to 1940, whichever is earlier, or periods of five years or greater. 1.6.1 DATA FAILURE The following data failure was identified during the course of this assessment: Data Failure The earliest historical resource obtained during this assessment was an aerial photograph from 1939 indicating that the subject property was developed agriculturally. The lack of historical sources for the subject property dating back to first developed use represents historical data source failure. However, as it is assumed that the subject property would have been previously used for agricultural purposes, if not undeveloped, this data failure is not expected to significantly alter the findings of this assessment. Information/Sources Consulted City directories, aerial photographs, agency records, interviews Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 12 1.6.2 DATA GAPS AEI did not identify significant data gaps which affected our ability to identify RECs. 1.7 RELIANCE All reports, both verbal and written, are for the benefit of De Anza Properties / Sandridge Partners. This report has no other purpose and may not be relied upon by any other person or entity without the written consent of AEI. Either verbally or in writing, third parties may come into possession of this report or all or part of the information generated as a result of this work. In the absence of a written agreement with AEI granting such rights, no third parties shall have rights of recourse or recovery whatsoever under any course of action against AEI, its officers, employees, vendors, successors, or assigns. Reliance is provided in accordance with AEI's contract and Standard Terms and Conditions executed by De Anza Properties / Sandridge Partners on July 24, 2018. The limitation of liability defined in the Terms and Conditions is the aggregate limit of AEI's liability to the client and all relying parties. Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 13 2.0 SITE AND VICINITY DESCRIPTION 2.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address(es)10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, Santa Clara County, California 95014 Property ID (APN or Block/Lot)326-10-061 Location Western side of North De Anza Boulevard Property Type Auto Repair SITE AND BUILDING INFORMATION Approximate Site Acreage/Source 1.23/Santa Clara County Assessor Number of Buildings One Building Construction Date(s)1971-1972 Building Square Footage (SF)/Source 8,323/City of Cupertino Number of Floors/Stories One + mezzanine Basement or Subgrade Area(s)None identified Number of Units One Additional Improvements Asphalt-paved parking/drive areas, concrete-paved walkways, landscaped areas and a building enclosure with drums and a waste oil AST On-site Occupant(s)Goodyear Tire & Service Center Current On-site Operations/Use General automotive services, general office uses and routine facility maintenance Current Use of Hazardous Substances Yes; refer to Section 7.1 REGULATORY INFORMATION Regulatory Database Listing(s)HIST UST, CUPA Listings, CERS, CERS Hazardous Waste, HAZNET, FINDS Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 14 Subject Property Address/ Unit Tenant Use 10931 North De Anza Boulevard Goodyear Tire & Service Center Goodyear Tire & Service Center has occupied the subject property building since construction in 1971-1972. The western side of the building contains a total of eight (8) automotive service bays. Seven (7) below floor hydraulic lifts and one alignment rack are located in the service bays. Floor drains were observed in multiple locations in the service area, and are reportedly connected to a clarifier adjacent to the northern side of the building. Automotive parts, benches and tool storage areas are located throughout the service area. Multiple 55-gallon drums containing oil, automatic transmission fluid, used oil filters, absorbent, waste antifreeze and waste brake fluid are located in the southern portion of the shop. A floor sink and restroom are located immediately adjacent to the east of the service area. The floor sink contains a drain, and is reportedly used for the disposal of oily water from washing the routine washing of the shop floor. The area immediately adjacent to the east of the service area contains a tire storage area on the ground floor and on a mezzanine level. Two compressors, motor oil drums and one 120-gallon new oil AST are located at the southern end of the shop. The northeastern portion of the subject property building contains a lobby/customer lounge, offices and restrooms. A small enclosure adjacent to the southern side of the building contains empty drums, one 55-gallon drum of antifreeze and one 120-gallon AST of waste oil. The remaining areas of the subject property consist of paved parking/drive areas and landscaped areas. 2.2 ON-SITE UTILITIES Utility Source/System Information Heating System Natural gas Cooling System Electricity Potable Water San Jose Water Company Sewage Disposal/Treatment City of Cupertino Utility source/system information listed in the table above is provided by Mr. Erik Bergman, unless otherwise noted above. 2.3 SITE AND VICINITY CHARACTERISTICS The subject property is located in a mixed commercial and residential area of Cupertino, California. The immediately surrounding properties consist of the following: Direction Tenant/Use (Address)Regulatory Database Listing(s) North Star One Credit Union, Monley Donuts and Max Real Financial (10991 North De Anza Boulevard) and Rite Aid (20572 Homestead Road) RCRA-CESQG, CUPA Listings, HAZNET, CERS Hazardous Waste, CIWQS East North De Anza Boulevard followed by: Aviare Apartments (20415 Via Paviso) LUST, Historic LUST, Historic Cortese, CERS South Cupertino Hotel (10889 North De Anza Boulevard) None identified West Ulta Beauty (20580 Homestead Road) and Stein Mart (20600 Homestead Road) CERS Hazardous Waste, CERS, RCRA-CESQG, FINDS, ECHO, CUPA Listings, HAZNET Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 15 If the surrounding properties are listed in the regulatory database, please refer to Section 5.1 for discussion. 2.4 PHYSICAL SETTING Geologic Unit: Description/Source Marine sedimentary and alluvial deposits of the Cenozoic era/USGS and United States Department of the Interior Soil Series: Description/Source Urban Land Flaskan Complex - well drained sandy loam, sandy clay loam, gravelly sandy clay loam and very gravelly sandy clay loam soil with a depth of 59 inches; parent material is described as alluvium derived from metamorphic and sedimentary rock and/or alluvium derived from metavolcanics; urban land index indicated that 70% of the site area is classified as urban land, with the remaining 30% classified as Flaskan and minor components/USDA Soil Survey Groundwater Flow Direction/Source Northeast/Topographic map interpretation Estimated Depth to Groundwater/ Source 125 feet bgs or deeper/Santa Clara Valley Water District's (SCVWD) February 19, 1991 LUST Case Closure Recommendation for Mariani Fruit Packing Plant - 10930 North De Anza Boulevard (located adjacent to the east) Surface waters on the subject property or adjacent sites None Note: Groundwater flow direction can be influenced locally and regionally by the presence of local wetland features, surface topography, recharge and discharge areas, horizontal and vertical inconsistencies in the types and location of subsurface soils, and proximity to water pumping wells. Depth and gradient of the water table can change seasonally in response to variation in precipitation and recharge, and over time, in response to urban development such as storm water controls, impervious surfaces, pumping wells, cleanup activities, dewatering, seawater intrusion barrier projects near the coast, and other factors. Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 16 3.0 HISTORICAL REVIEW OF SITE AND VICINITY Reasonably ascertainable standard historical sources as outlined in ASTM Standard E1527-13 were used to determine previous uses and occupancies of the subject property that are likely to have led to RECs in connection with the subject property. A chronological summary of historical data found, including but not limited to aerial photographs, historical city directories, Sanborn fire insurance maps, and agency records, is as follows: Date Range Subject Property Description and Use (Historical Addresses)Source(s) Prior to 1939 Unknown use/Data failure; refer to Section 1.6.1 Aerial photographs, city directories and agency records 1939-1968 Agricultural land Aerial photographs 1971-1972-Present Current building constructed for Goodyear Tire & Service Center/automotive service operations Aerial photographs, city directories, interviews, agency records, site observation The subject property was historically used for agricultural purposes. There is a potential that agricultural chemicals, such as pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers, were used on site. The entire area of the subject property is either paved over or covered by improvements that make direct contact with any potential remaining concentrations in the soil unlikely. Furthermore, the subject property is developed and used for commercial purposes and thus no further action related to the former agricultural use of the subject property is warranted at this time. Review of County of Santa Clara and City of Cupertino records and the Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) regulatory database report indicated that the subject property has been utilized as an automotive service facility by Goodyear Tire & Service Center since 1971-1972. The HIST UST database in the EDR regulatory database indicated that one 200-gallon waste oil UST was installed at the subject property in 1973. The Santa Clara County Fire Department file indicated that one 200-gallon waste oil UST was located at the subject property, as discussed in a correspondence file. However, no additional information regarding the UST was included in the agency files, including location, sampling data or removal activities. Based on this information, the waste oil UST represents a REC to the subject property at this time. The subject property is equipped with seven (7) below-ground hydraulic lifts. Six (6) of the lifts were presumably installed in 1971-1972, when the building was constructed, and the seventh lift was installed in 2015 and replaced an older lift (presumably installed in 1971-1972). No information regarding sampling activities during the removal and replacement of the seventh lift was made available to AEI. Based on the pre-1977 installation of the lifts, the potential exists that the hydraulic fluid within the lift systems previously contained PCBs. Due to the age of the equipment, the integrity of the equipment is unknown; therefore, the potential exists that a release of hydraulic fluid which may have contained PCBs has occurred on site. Therefore, the presence of the hydraulic lifts and the lack of sampling data for the removed hydraulic lift represents a REC to the subject property at this time. Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 17 A four-chambered clarifier was observed adjacent to the north of the subject property building. The age of the clarifier system is unknown; however, likely installed during the construction of the building (1971-1972). Clarifiers are used to treat waste water streams. Clarifiers can act as conduits to the subsurface of properties and when utilized to treat waste water streams, can act as preferential pathways for contaminants in the waste streams. Additionally, the structural integrity of clarifiers and their associated piping can become compromised over time, especially when located in areas prone to high seismic activity. AEI observed an oily liquid at the bottom of the chambers in the clarifier. Mr. Erik Bergman, Assistant Manager of Goodyear, was unaware of any maintenance of the clarifier. The shop sink and floor drains within the shop reportedly discharge to the clarifier system. Evidence of oily liquid was observed within some of the floor drains within the shop. Additionally, AEI observed staining and spillage from apparent routine automotive service operations, transfer of waste fluids, filters, etc. from smaller containers to drums and the waste oil AST throughout the shop floor. The shop floor is routinely washed with soap and water, and the oily water is discharged to the drain in the floor sink or in the toilet in the adjacent shop restroom. According to a review of records at the Santa Clara County Environmental Health Department (SCCEHD), the subject property has received violations in 1997, 2000, 2008, and 2017 for the improper storage or hazardous substances and evidence of spillage of waste oil and anti-freeze. Based on the use of hazardous materials on site, evidence of staining observed during the site reconnaissance, the aforementioned violations, the presence of floor drains, and the length of time the clarifier system has likely been in place (47 years), the current and historical use of the subject property for automotive repair purposes represents a REC to the subject property at this time. Refer to Sections 4.0, 5.1 and 7.1 for further discussion of environmental concerns associated with the current and historical use of the subject property for automotive service operations. If available, copies of historical sources are provided in the report appendices. 3.1 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AEI reviewed aerial photographs of the subject property and surrounding area. A search was made of the Environmental Data Resources, Inc. collection of aerial photographs. Aerial photographs were reviewed for the following years: Year(s) Subject Property Description Adjacent Site Descriptions 1939, 1948, 1956 Agricultural land NORTH: Agricultural land EAST: Roadway followed by what appears agricultural land, residential and warehouse-type buildings SOUTH: Agricultural land WEST: Agricultural land and a residential-type building Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 18 Year(s) Subject Property Description Adjacent Site Descriptions 1968 Agricultural land NORTH: Agricultural land, with gasoline service station farther north EAST: Roadway followed by what appears agricultural land, packing facility and warehouse-type buildings SOUTH: Commercial-type buildings and paved areas WEST: Agricultural land and a residential-type building 1974, 1982 The subject property appears to be developed with the existing Goodyear Tire and Service Center building and paved areas. NORTH: Paved lot, with gasoline service station farther north EAST: Roadway followed by what appears agricultural land, packing facility and warehouse-type buildings SOUTH: Commercial-type buildings and paved areas WEST: Commercial-type building and paved areas 1991 The subject property appears to be developed with the existing Goodyear Tire and Service Center building and paved areas. NORTH: Paved lot and retail building EAST: Roadway followed by vacant, cleared land SOUTH: Cupertino Hotel building and paved areas WEST: Commercial-type building and paved areas 1999, 2005, 2006, 2009, 2010 The subject property appears to be developed with the existing Goodyear Tire and Service Center building and paved areas. NORTH: Paved lot and retail building EAST: Roadway followed by housing development SOUTH: Cupertino Hotel building and paved areas WEST: Commercial-type building and paved areas 2012 The subject property appears to be developed with the existing Goodyear Tire and Service Center building and paved areas. NORTH: Paved driveway, with dirt surface, retail building and Rite Aid building farther north EAST: Roadway followed by housing development SOUTH: Cupertino Hotel building and paved areas WEST: Commercial-type building and paved areas Refer to Section 3.1 for further discussion of historical agricultural use. 3.2 SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAPS Sanborn Fire Insurance maps were developed in the late 1800s and early 1900s for use as an assessment tool for fire insurance rates in urbanized areas. A search was made of the Environmental Data Resources, Inc. collection of Sanborn Fire Insurance maps. Sanborn map coverage was not available for the subject property. Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 19 3.3 CITY DIRECTORIES A search of historical city directories was conducted for the subject property utilizing Environmental Data Resources, Inc. and Cupertino Public Library. Please refer to the appendices for a complete list of historical subject property tenants identified by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Directories were reviewed in approximate five-year increments from 1968 to 2017. The first listing for the subject property appeared in 1973. The following table summarizes the potential tenants of concern based on AEI's review of the historical city directories. Year(s)Address - Occupant Listed 1968 10931 North De Anza Boulevard - No Listings 1973 10931 North De Anza Boulevard - Bill Deane Inc. 1978, 1983 10931 North De Anza Boulevard - Goodyear Tire & Rubber 1988 10931 North De Anza Boulevard - Goodyear Auto Service Center 1992, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2014, 2017 10931 North De Anza Boulevard - Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company If listed above, XXXX indicates that the address is valid but there is no occupancy information available. AEI identified potential environmental concerns associated with the automotive service operations conducted at the subject property by Goodyear since 1971-1972. Refer to Sections 3.1, 4.0 and 7.1 for further discussion. 3.4 HISTORICAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS Based on the quality of information obtained from other sources, historical topographic maps were not reviewed as a part of this assessment. 3.5 CHAIN OF TITLE Based on the quality of information obtained from other sources, a chain of title search was not performed as part of this assessment. Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 20 4.0 REGULATORY AGENCY RECORDS REVIEW Local and state agencies, such as environmental health departments, fire prevention bureaus, and building and planning departments are contacted to identify any current or previous reports of hazardous substance use, storage, and/or unauthorized releases that may have impacted the subject property. In addition, information pertaining to AULs, defined as legal or physical restrictions, or limitations on the use of, or access to, a site or facility, is requested. 4.1 LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND/OR STATE ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY Agency Date Contacted Method of Contact Name & Title of Contact Agency Response Santa Clara County Environmental Health Department (SCCEHD) July 26, 2018 Email Ms. Melissa Belloso Response received, records discussed below Santa Clara County Environmental Health Department File 1994 – The file included a Hazardous Waste Generator Permit Application for Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, which indicated that Goodyear generated less than 5 tons of waste per year. 1997 – An inspection of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company identified minor violations, which pertained to improperly labeled drums and waste oil tank. In addition, antifreeze spills were observed in the parking lot around the antifreeze storage area outside of the building, and in one of the storage bays. Waste oil was observed to be spilled in the area where waste oil is siphoned to the tank. 2000 – The file contained an inspection of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, which identified violations associated with an unlabeled waste oil AST, improperly labeled drums, spills of waste oil around the oil filter storage area (subsequently cleaned up), and lack of training records. 2008 – The file contained an inspection of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, which identified violations associated with improperly labeled drums, open antifreeze drums and spill of antifreeze into the 55-gallon drum secondary containment area. The violations were subsequently corrected. 2017 – The file contained an inspection of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, which identified violations associated with unlabeled drums, storage of drums beyond the maximum accumulation date, lack of manifest records, oil saturated absorbent around the secondary containment area, and additional minor violations. 2018 - The file contained a California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) form for Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, which was accepted on April 3, 2018. The form indicated that Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company is a hazardous material storage and waste generator facility with no registered aboveground or underground storage tanks. The Hazardous Materials and Waste Inventory Matrix identified automatic transmission fluid, used oil, drained oil filters, waste antifreeze and new oil. The waste oil and new oil ASTs are described as 245-gallon in size. Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 21 4.2 FIRE DEPARTMENT Agency Date Contacted Method of Contact Name & Title of Contact Agency Response Santa Clara County Fire Department (SCCFD) July 26, 2018 Office visit Ms. Victoria Bebee Response received, records discussed below Santa Clara County Fire Department File The SCCFD file contained multiple permits and Hazardous Materials Management Plans (HMMP) and Hazardous Materials Business Plans (HMBP) for Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company dating back to 1988. In addition, the file contained the original building plans for the construction of the existing Goodyear Store that were prepared by HM Architect in 1971. Due to the poor quality of the plans, the exact site details could not be determined. Historic permits in the file included a proposal to install a 260-gallon waste oil AST, dated August 28, 1990. Historic permits identified multiple minor violations associated with minor spills, unlabeled containers and a secondary containment area that needed to be cleaned. The most recent HMBP in the file is dated February 19, 2008, and indicates that Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company is a registered hazardous material storage and hazardous waste generator with no registered aboveground or underground storage tanks. A hand written notation in the file indicated that there were no underground storage tanks at the subject property. The Non-Waste Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement identified motor oil, antifreeze, refrigerant, transmission fluid and helium. The Hazardous Waste Inventory Statement identified used motor oil, waste antifreeze and parts wash. The file also contained a CERS document, which was submitted on September 11, 2013. The CERS contained similar information as the April 3, 2018 CERS that is discussed in the SCCEHD section. No additional pertinent information was included in the file. 4.3 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Agency Date Contacted Method of Contact Name & Title of Contact Agency Response Cupertino Building Department (CBD) August 6, 2018 Website Staff Online database searched, records discussed below Records Summary Year(s)Owner/Applicant Description of Permit and Building Use 2000 Anderson Signs Sign permit for Goodyear 2014 John T. Vidovich etal Remove and replace 8.5 ton package unit to clear code enforcement case 2015 Vidovich Permit for installation of an in-ground lift in Bay #6 2015 Vidovich Permit to saw cut floor, break out concrete, excavate and remove old lift No historical building permits were available for review in the CBD files. Evidence indicating Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 22 current or prior use or storage of hazardous substances was not on file for the subject property with the CBD. Refer to Section 7.1 for further discussion of the in-ground hydraulic lifts. 4.4 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Agency Date Contacted Method of Contact Name & Title of Contact Agency Response Cupertino Planning Department (CPD) August 6, 2018 Office visit Staff No evidence indicating the existence of AULs on file for the subject property 4.5 ASSESSOR'S OFFICE Agency Date Contacted Method of Contact Name & Title of Contact Agency Response Santa Clara County Assessor's Office August 6, 2018 Website N/A Information obtained is discussed below Records Summary APN 326-10-061 Acreage 1.23 acres Construction Date Not provided Building Square Footage Not provided Current Owner Not provided 4.6 OTHER AGENCIES SEARCHED Agency Date Contacted Method of Contact Name & Title of Contact Agency Response CA State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Geotracker July 26, 2018 Website N/A Online database searched, no records on file CA Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Hazardous Waste Tracking System (HWTS) July 26, 2018 Website N/A Online database searched, records discussed below CA DTSC Envirostor July 26, 2018 Website N/A Online database searched, no records on file BAAQMD July 26, 2018 Website and Telephone Rochelle Reed Response received, no records on file HWTS The HWTS file contained two records for the subject property address. Edward and Sons (10931 Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 23 North De Anza Boulevard) is listed as an inactive hazardous waste transporter site as of August 6, 2015. No manifest records were included in the file. Goodyear Tire & Service Center #8773 (10931 North De Anza Boulevard) is listed as an active hazardous waste transporter facility as of July 7, 2017. Manifest records from 1993 to 2017 indicated that aqueous solution wastes, hydrocarbon solvents, oil/water separation sludge, unspecified oil-containing wastes, unspecified organic liquid mixture wastes and other organic solid wastes were removed and transported to an offsite disposal facility under manifest. No additional pertinent information was included in HWTS. 4.7 OIL AND GAS WELLS Agency Date Referenced Resource Oil or gas wells located within 500 feet of the subject property Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) July 26, 2018 DOGGR Map No 4.8 OIL AND GAS PIPELINES Agency Date Referenced Resource Pipelines located within 500 feet of the subject property National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) July 26, 2018 NPMS Public Map Viewer No Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 24 5.0 REGULATORY DATABASE RECORDS REVIEW AEI contracted EDR to conduct a search of publicly available information from federal, state, tribal, and local databases containing known and suspected sites of environmental contamination and sites of potential environmental significance. Data gathered during the current regulatory database search is compiled by EDR into one regulatory database report. Location information for listed sites is designated using geocoded information provided by federal, state, or local agencies and commonly used mapping databases with the exception of "Orphan" sites. Due to poor or inadequate address information, Orphan sites are identified but not geocoded/mapped by EDR, rather, information is provided based upon vicinity zip codes, city name, and state. The number of listed sites identified within the approximate minimum search distance from the federal and state environmental records database listings specified in ASTM Standard E1527-13 is summarized in Section 5.1, along with the total number of Orphan sites. A copy of the regulatory database report, which includes detailed descriptions of the databases noted below, is included in Appendix C of this report. In determining if a listed site is a potential environmental concern to the subject property, AEI generally applies the following criteria to classify the site as lower potential environmental concern: 1) the site only holds an operating permit (which does not imply a release), 2) the site's distance from, and/or topographic position relative to, the subject property, and/or 3) the site has recently been granted "No Further Action" by the appropriate regulatory agency. 5.1 RECORDS SUMMARY Database Search Distance (Miles) Subject Property Listed Listings Within Search Distance Listings Determined To Warrant Additional Discussion Below NPL 1.0 No 0 0 DELISTED NPL 0.5 No 0 0 SEMS/CERCLIS 0.5 No 0 0 SEMS-ARCHIVE/CERCLIS NFRAP 0.5 No 1 0 RCRA CORRACTS 1.0 No 1 0 RCRA-TSDF 0.5 No 1 0 RCRA LQG, SQG, CESQGs, NLR SP/ADJ No 2 2 US ENG CONTROLS SP No 0 0 US INST CONTROLS SP No 0 0 ERNS SP No 0 0 STATE/TRIBAL HWS 1.0 No 3 0 STATE/TRIBAL SWLF 0.5 No 0 0 STATE/TRIBAL REGISTERED STORAGE TANKS SP/ADJ No 0 0 STATE/TRIBAL LUST 0.5 No 12 1 STATE/TRIBAL EC and IC SP No 0 0 STATE/TRIBAL VCP 0.5 No 0 0 STATE/TRIBAL BROWNFIELD 0.5 No 1 0 ORPHAN N/A No 0 0 Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 25 Database Search Distance (Miles) Subject Property Listed Listings Within Search Distance Listings Determined To Warrant Additional Discussion Below ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES SP/ADJ Yes 19 19 Facility Name Goodyear Address 10931 North De Anza Boulevard Distance & Direction Subject Property Hydrologic Position N/A Databases Listed HIST UST, CUPA Listings, CERS, CERS Hazardous Waste, HAZNET, FINDS Comments The HIST UST database indicated that one 200-gallon waste oil UST was installed at the subject property in 1973. No additional pertinent information regarding the waste oil UST was included in the EDR regulatory database report. The CUPA Listings, CERS and CERS Hazardous Waste databases indicated that Goodyear is a registered hazardous waste generator and chemical storage facility with multiple reported violations. Refer to Section 4.6 above for a discussion of manifest records that are also discussed in the HAZNET database. There is no pertinent information in the FINDS database. The long term use of the subject property for automotive service purposes and unknown status of the 200-gallon waste oil UST are considered an REC. Refer to Section 3.1 and 4.0 for additional information. Facility Name Mariani Packing Address 10930 North De Anza Boulevard Distance & Direction Adjacent to the east (130 feet) Hydrologic Position Down-gradient Databases Listed LUST, Historic LUST, Historic Cortese, CERS Comments The LUST, Historic LUST, Historic Cortese and CERS databases indicated that the groundwater contamination case associated with the former packing facility on the eastern side of North De Anza Boulevard was closed by SCVWD on February 19, 1991. This adjacent property was subsequently redeveloped with the existing apartment complex. Based on LUST case closure, relative distance, successful redevelopment of the adjacent property for residential purposes and regional groundwater flow direction, this site is not expected to represent a REC to the subject property at this time. Facility Name Rite Aid Address 20572 Homestead Road Distance & Direction Adjacent to the north Hydrologic Position Cross-gradient Databases Listed RCRA-CESQG, CUPA Listings, HAZNET, CERS Hazardous Waste, CIWQS Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 26 Comments The RCRA-CESQG database indicated that Rite Aid is a registered conditionally exempt small quantity hazardous waste generator with no reported violations. The CUPA, CERS and HAZNET listings indicated that this site is a registered hazardous waste generator, and various hazardous wastes were removed from this site under manifest. The CIWQS listing pertains to storm water discharges during a construction project. The permit is listed as terminated as of September 28, 2012. Based on the lack of a documented release, the review of regulatory agency files for this site was not deemed necessary, and the listings are not expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time. Facility Name Ulta Beauty Address 20580 Homestead Road Distance & Direction Adjacent to the west Hydrologic Position Up-gradient Databases Listed CERS, CERS Hazardous Waste, CUPA Listings and HAZNET Comments The CERS, CUPA and HAZNET listings indicated that this site is a registered hazardous waste generator, and various hazardous wastes were removed from this site under manifest. Based on the lack of a documented release, the review of regulatory agency files for this site was not deemed necessary, and the listings are not expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time. Facility Name Rite Aid Address 20580 Homestead Road Distance & Direction Adjacent to the west Hydrologic Position Up-gradient Databases Listed RCRA-CESQG, FINDS, ECHO Comments The RCRA-CESQG database indicated that Rite Aid is a registered conditionally exempt small quantity hazardous waste generator with no reported violations. There is no pertinent information in the FINDS and ECHO databases. Based on the lack of a documented release, the review of regulatory agency files for this site was not deemed necessary, and the listings are not expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time. 5.2 VAPOR MIGRATION AEI reviewed reasonably ascertainable information for the subject and nearby properties, including a regulatory database, files for nearby release sites, and/or historical documentation, to determine if potential vapor-phase migration concerns may be present which could impact the subject property. Potential vapor migration concerns for the subject property are discussed in Section 3.1. Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 27 6.0 INTERVIEWS AND USER PROVIDED INFORMATION 6.1 INTERVIEWS Pursuant to ASTM E1527-13, the following interviews were performed during this assessment in order to obtain information indicating RECs in connection with the subject property. 6.1.1 OWNER AND KEY SITE MANAGER Relation to Property Name Date Interviewed Method of Contact Year First Associated w/ Property Notes Owner Representative Mr. Brian Tjader August 6, 2018 In Person Not provided Interviewed; see Interview Summary table below Key Site Manager Mr. Erik Bergman August 6, 2018 In Person 2016 Interviewed; see Interview Summary table below Interview Summary Question Owner (Representative) Response/ Comment Key Site Manager Response/ Comment Do you have any knowledge of USTs, clarifiers or oil/water separators, sumps, or other subsurface features? Yes Yes Do you have any knowledge of previous environmental investigations conducted on site? No No Do you have any knowledge of current or past industrial operations and/or other operations which would involve the use of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products? No No Are you aware of any known plans for site redevelopment or change in site use? No No Are you aware of any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property? No No Are you aware of any pending, threatened or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property? No No Are you aware of any notices from any governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products? No No Are you aware of any incidents of flooding, leaks, or other water intrusion, and/or complaints related to indoor air quality? No No Additional information provided:N/A N/A 6.1.2 PAST OWNERS, OPERATORS, AND OCCUPANTS AEI did not attempt to interview past owners, operators, and occupants of the subject property because information from these sources would likely be duplicative of information already obtained from other sources. Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 28 6.1.3 INTERVIEW WITH OTHERS Information obtained during interviews with local government officials is incorporated into the appropriate segments of this report. 6.2 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION User provided information is intended to help identify the possibility of RECs in connection with the subject property. According to ASTM E1527-13 and the EPA Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), certain items should be researched by the prospective landowner or grantee, and the results of such inquiries may be provided to the Environmental Professional. The responsibility for qualifying for LLPs by conducting the inquiries ultimately rests with the User, and providing the information to the Environmental Professional would be prudent if such information is available. The User did not complete the ASTM User Questionnaire or provide the User information to AEI. AEI assumes that qualification for the LLPs is being established by the User in documentation outside of this assessment. Question Response/ Comment 1. Environmental liens that are filed or recorded against the property (40 CFR 312.25) Did a search of recorded land title records (or judicial records where appropriate) identify any environmental liens filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state or local law? Information not provided 2. Activity and use limitations that are in place on the property or that have been filed or recorded against the property (40 CFR 312.26(a)(1)(v) and vi)). Did a search of recorded land title records (or judicial records where appropriate) identify any AULs, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or institutional controls that are in place at the property and/or have been filed or recorded against the property under federal, tribal, state or local law? Information not provided 3. Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLP (40 CFR 312.28). Do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties? For example, are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business? Information not provided 4. Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not contaminated (40 CFR 312.29). Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the property? If you conclude that there is a difference, have you considered whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is known or believed to be present at the property? Information not provided Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 29 Question Response/ Comment 5. Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property (40 CFR 312.30). Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help the environmental professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? For example: (a) Do you know the past uses of the property? (b) Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present at the property? (c) Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? (d) Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property? Information not provided 6. The degree of obviousness of the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property, and the ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigation (40 CFR 312.31). Based on your knowledge and experience related to the property, are there any obvious indicators that point to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property? Information not provided 6.3 PREVIOUS REPORTS AND OTHER PROVIDED DOCUMENTATION No prior reports or other relevant documentation in association with the subject property was made available to AEI during the course of this assessment. 6.4 ENVIRONMENTAL LIEN SEARCH In accordance with our approved scope of services, an environmental lien search was not performed as part of this assessment. Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 30 7.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE Site Reconnaissance Date August 6, 2018 AEI Site Assessor(s)Christopher Olsen Property Escort(s)/ Relationship(s) to Property Mr. Brian Tjader, Owner Representative with De Anza Properties Mr. Erik Bergman, Assistant Manager of Goodyear Units/Areas Observed All interior and exterior areas of the subject property were accessed during the site reconnaissance. Area(s) not accessed and reason(s) None Other Physical Constraints None Reconnaissance Findings Summary Feature Observed on Subject Property (see Section 7.1) Observed on Adjacent Property (see Section 7.2) Regulated Hazardous Substances/Wastes and/or Petroleum Products in Connection with Property Use  Aboveground/Underground Hazardous Substance or Petroleum Product Storage Tanks (ASTs/USTs) Hazardous Substance and Petroleum Product Containers Not in Connection with Property Use Unidentified Substance Containers Electrical or Mechanical Equipment Likely to Contain Fluids  Interior Stains or Corrosion  Strong, Pungent, or Noxious Odors Pools of Liquid Drains, Sumps, and Clarifiers  Pits, Ponds, and Lagoons Stained Soil or Pavement Stressed Vegetation Solid Waste Disposal or Evidence of Fill Materials Waste Water Discharges Wells Septic Systems Biomedical Wastes Other 7.1 SUBJECT PROPERTY RECONNAISSANCE FINDINGS During the site reconnaissance, AEI observed the items listed in the above Reconnaissance Findings Summary table, which are further discussed below. Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 31 7.1.1 REGULATED HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES/WASTES AND/OR PETROLEUM PRODUCTS IN CONNECTION WITH PROPERTY USE Substance/Waste (size/quantity)Location Operations Associated with Material Disposal Method/ Frequency Secondary Containment Staining/ Spills Janitorial/maintenance supplies/several retail-sized containers Automotive service area, store room and storage areas Facility maintenance N/A No None observed Motor oil/Thirteen (13) 55-gallon drums, one-quart containers, 120-gallon AST Automotive service area, store room and storage areas Automotive services N/A Yes Staining and minor spillage of oil observed on concrete floor Automatic transmission fluid/one 55-gallon drum Automotive service area Automotive services N/A Yes Staining and minor spillage of oil observed on concrete floor Antifreeze/one 55-gallon drum Automotive service area Automotive services N/A Yes Staining and minor spillage of oil observed on concrete floor Lead-acid batteries/ multiple Automotive service area Automotive services N/A No None observed Parts washing solvent/ parts washer Automotive service area Parts washing Safety Kleen services as needed Yes Staining and minor spillage of oil observed on concrete floor Miscellaneous automotive fluids/multiple retail-sized containers Automotive service area Automotive services N/A Yes Staining and minor spillage of oil observed on concrete floor Waste oil/120-gallon AST Enclosure adjacent to the building Automotive services Safety Kleen removes the waste on a regular basis Yes Staining and minor spillage of oil observed on concrete floor Used antifreeze/one 55-gallon drum Automotive service area Automotive services Safety Kleen removes the waste on a regular basis Yes Staining and minor spillage of oil observed on concrete floor Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 32 Absorbent with waste oil/ one 55-gallon drum Automotive service area Automotive services Safety Kleen removes the waste on a regular basis Yes Staining and minor spillage of oil observed on concrete floor Used brake fluid/one 55-gallon drum Automotive service area Automotive services Safety Kleen removes the waste on a regular basis Yes Staining and minor spillage of oil observed on concrete floor Used aerosol cans/one 55-gallon drum Automotive service area Automotive services Safety Kleen removes the waste on a regular basis Yes Staining and minor spillage of oil observed on concrete floor Used oil filters/three 55-gallon drums Automotive service area Automotive services Safety Kleen removes the waste on a regular basis Yes Staining and minor spillage of oil observed on concrete floor AEI observed surface staining and minor spillage of oil on the concrete-paved surface adjacent to the above noted hazardous material and waste storage areas. The source(s) of the staining and spillage appeared to be the routine automotive service operations, transfer of waste fluids, filters, etc. from smaller containers to drums and the waste oil AST. Floor drains were observed in multiple locations in the shop, and surface staining and an oily liquid was observed in multiple drains. In addition, a floor sink in the shop is reportedly used to discharge oily water from mop buckets. The shop floor is routinely washed with soap and water, and the oily water is discharged to the drain in the floor sink or in the toilet in the adjacent shop restroom. The drains and floor sink are reportedly connected to the onsite clarifier, which is discussed in Sections 3.1 and 7.1.5 below. 7.1.2 ABOVEGROUND/UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE OR PETROLEUM PRODUCT STORAGE TANKS (ASTS/USTS) AST(s) Size (gallons)Contents Installation Date AST Condition Location Construction/ Secondary Containment Product Piping (Aboveground/ Underground) Staining/ Spills 120 New oil Unknown Good Store room Double-walled Aboveground Staining and minor spillage of oil observed on concrete floor Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 33 120 Waste oil 2008 Good Enclosure adjacent to the building Double-walled Aboveground Staining and minor spillage of oil observed on concrete floor The subject property is equipped with one (1) 120-gallon new oil and one (1) 120-gallon waste oil AST located in the store room and adjacent to the building (See Figure 2). Minor surface staining and spillage of oil was observed on the concrete floor adjacent to the above noted ASTs. However, no floor drains, significant cracking in the floor or other subsurface entry points were observed in the area of surface staining and minor oil spillage. No secondary containment was in place. Based on the amount and nature of staining, the new oil and waste oil ASTs are not expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time; however, housekeeping should be improved to prevent further staining and spills. In addition, as a best management practice, secondary containment should be provided for fuel ASTs. 7.1.3 ELECTRICAL OR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT LIKELY TO CONTAIN FLUIDS Toxic PCBs were commonly used historically in electrical equipment such as transformers, fluorescent lamp ballasts, and capacitors. According to United States EPA regulation 40 CFR Part 761, there are three categories for classifying such equipment: <50 ppm of PCBs is considered "Non-PCB"; between 50 and 500 ppm is considered "PCB-Contaminated"; and >500 ppm is considered "PCB-Containing". Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 2605(e)(2)(A), the manufacture, process, or distribution in commerce or use of any polychlorinated biphenyl in any manner other than in a totally enclosed manner was prohibited after January 1, 1977. Transformers Type Quantity Owner Presumed Date of Installation Spills or Stains Observed (Yes/No) Non-PCB Label (Yes/ No) Pad-Mounted One PG&E 1971-1972 No No The management of potential PCB-containing transformers is the responsibility of the local utility or the transformer owner. Actual material samples need to be collected to determine if transformers are PCB-containing. Transformers installed prior to 1977 may be PCB containing while transformers installed after 1977 are unlikely to be PCB containing. Federal Regulations (40 CFR 761 Subpart G) require any release of material containing >50 ppm PCB and occurring after May 4, 1987, be cleaned up by the transformer owner following the United States EPA’s PCB spill cleanup policy. AEI did not observe evidence of spills, staining, or leaks on or around the transformer. Based on the good condition of the equipment, the transformer is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time. Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 34 Hydraulic Lifts The subject property is equipped with seven (7) below-ground hydraulic lifts. Six (6) of the lifts were presumably installed in 1971-1972, when the building was constructed, and the seventh lift was installed in 2015 and replaced an older lift (presumably installed in 1971-1972). No information regarding sampling activities during the removal and replacement of the seventh lift was made available to AEI. Based on the pre-1977 installation of the lifts, the potential exists that the hydraulic fluid within the lift systems previously contained PCBs. Due to the age of the equipment, the integrity of the equipment is unknown; therefore, the potential exists that a release of hydraulic fluid which may have contained PCBs has occurred on site. Therefore, the presence of the hydraulic lifts and the lack of sampling data for the removed hydraulic lift represents a REC to the subject property at this time. 7.1.4 INTERIOR STAINS OR CORROSION AEI observed surface staining and minor spillage of oil on the concrete-paved surface adjacent to the above noted hazardous material and waste storage areas. The source(s) of the staining and spillage appeared to be the routine automotive service operations, transfer of waste fluids, filters, etc. from smaller containers to drums and the waste oil AST. Floor drains were observed in multiple locations in the shop, and surface staining and an oily liquid was observed in multiple drains. In addition, a floor sink in the shop is reportedly used to discharge oily water from mop buckets. The shop floor is routinely washed with soap and water, and the oily water is discharged to the drain in the floor sink or in the toilet in the adjacent shop restroom. The drains and floor sink are reportedly connected to the onsite clarifier, which is discussed in Sections 3.1 and 7.1.5 below. 7.1.5 DRAINS, SUMPS, AND CLARIFIERS Multiple floor drains and a drain in a floor sink were observed in the automotive service area. AEI observed surface staining and oily liquid in the drains in the automotive service area. The drains and floor sink are reportedly connected to an onsite clarifier that is located adjacent to the northern side of the building. The clarifier is discussed below: Oil/Water Separator(s)/Clarifier(s): Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 35 Subject Notes/Comments Location Northern side of the building Nature of Use Oil/water separator for interior floor drains and floor sink drain Number of Stages/Chambers Three Interior Observations The interior of the chambers was observed to contain oily water Construction Concrete Approximate Size Unknown Installation Date Unknown Nearby Hazardous Substances/Petroleum Products None Nearby Staining None Other Features Connected Unknown Discharge Point Reportedly discharges to municipal sewer system Maintenance History Not provided Permits None available for review from the City of Cupertino The above noted clarifier is reportedly used to capture oil and grease from wash water prior to discharge to the sanitary sewer system. AEI observed an oily liquid at the bottom of the chambers. Mr. Erik Bergman, Assistant Manager of Goodyear, was unaware of any maintenance of the clarifier. Refer to Section 3.1 for further discussion of the clarifier. 7.2 ADJACENT PROPERTY RECONNAISSANCE FINDINGS During the site reconnaissance, AEI observed the items listed in the above Reconnaissance Findings Summary table, which are further discussed below. 7.2.1 ELECTRICAL OR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT LIKELY TO CONTAIN FLUIDS Multiple pad-mounted transformers were observed on an adjacent site during the site reconnaissance. No spills, staining, or leaks were observed on or around the transformer. Based on the good condition of the equipment, the transformers are not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 36 8.0 NON-ASTM SERVICES 8.1 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS Asbestos is the name for a group of naturally occurring silicate minerals that can be separated into fibers. The fibers are strong, durable, and resistant to heat and fire. They are also long, thin and flexible, so they can even be woven into cloth. Because of these qualities, asbestos has been used in thousands of consumer, industrial, maritime, automotive, scientific and building products. During the 20th century, some 30 million tons of asbestos have been used in industrial sites, homes, schools, shipyards and commercial buildings in the United States. Commercial use of ACM began in the early 1900's and peaked in the period between 1940 and into the 1970's. Common ACMs include pipe-covering, insulating cement, insulating block, refactory and boiler insulation materials, transite board, fireproofing spray, joint compound, vinyl floor tile, ceiling tile, mastics, roofing products, and duct insulation for HVAC applications. Inhalation of asbestos fibers can result in deleterious health effects. The potential for ACM was evaluated based the USEPA Guidance Document: Managing Asbestos in Place - A Building Owner's Guide to Operations and Maintenance Programs for Asbestos-Containing Materials (the Green Book). In 1973 the NESHAPS banned the use of most spray-applied surfacing ACM, specifically asbestos containing spray-on fireproofing and insulation. Subsequent revisions to this regulation in 1975 and 1978 effectively eliminated the use of friable pre-molded pipe, boiler, turbine, and duct insulation; and the spray application of friable asbestos-containing materials for all uses in buildings. In 1989 the EPA issued regulations to ban some asbestos-containing products and phase out most others over a multi-year period. The "Ban and Phase-Down" rule was challenged in court and the regulation remanded to the agency. As a result, any asbestos-containing products then "in commerce" would not be banned. Those not in commerce would be banned. Those materials "banned" could not be sold. It did not affect such materials already installed, or in use. Most US firms voluntarily ceased production of asbestos containing building materials not covered by the aforementioned Federal bans by the mid-1980's. In 1994, the OSHA determined that employers and building owners are required to treat installed thermal system installation and sprayed on and troweled-on surfacing materials, as well as vinyl or asphalt flooring material, as ACM in buildings constructed no later than 1980 until tested by laboratory analysis to prove otherwise. The information below is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute an asbestos survey. In addition, the information is not intended to comply with federal, state or local regulations in regards to ACM. Due to the age of the subject property building, there is a potential that ACMs are present. A limited list of typical suspect ACMs is included in the following table: Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 37 Material Type Location Plaster (acoustical and smooth)Walls and ceilings Ceiling tile Ceiling systems Thermal systems insulations, packings, and gaskets Heating systems, cooling systems, domestic and heating and cooling piping, ductwork, and other equipment Floor tile and associate mastics, flooring felts, and papers (under hardwood/other)Floors Vinyl sheet flooring and adhesives Floors Cove base and associated mastics Walls Ceramic tile adhesives and grouts Walls, floors, and ceilings All adhesives Mirrors, wall coverings, construction, etc. Grout and caulking Windows and doors Gypsum board, tape, and joint compound Wall and ceiling systems Insulation materials Walls, ceilings, and attic spaces Roofing materials (felts, rolled, shingle, flashings, adhesives, tar, and insulations)Roof and parapet wall systems Brick and block, mortars Walls The observed suspect ACMs at the subject property were in good condition at the time of the site reconnaissance and are not expected to pose a health and safety concern to the occupants of the subject property at this time. Based on the potential presence of ACMs, AEI recommends the implementation of an O&M Plan which stipulates that the repair and maintenance of damaged materials should be performed to protect the health and safety of the building occupants. In the event that building renovation or demolition activities are planned, a thorough asbestos survey to identify asbestos-containing building materials is required in accordance with the EPA NESHAP 40 CFR Part 61 prior to demolition or renovation activities that may disturb suspect ACMs. 8.2 LEAD-BASED PAINT LBP is defined as any paint, varnish, stain, or other applied coating that has ≥1 mg/cm² (5,000 μg/g or 5,000 ppm) or more of lead by federal guidelines; state and local definitions may differ from the federal definitions in amounts ranging from 0.5 mg/cm² to 2.0 mg/cm². Section 1017 of the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines, Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992, otherwise known as "Title X", defines a LBP hazard as "any condition that causes exposure to lead that would result in adverse human health effects" resulting from lead-contaminated dust, bare, lead-contaminated soil, and/or lead-contaminated paint that is deteriorated or present on accessible, friction, or impact surfaces. Therefore, under Title X, intact LBP on most walls and ceilings would not be considered a "hazard", although the paint should be maintained and its condition monitored to ensure that it does not deteriorate and become a hazard. Additionally, Section 1018 of this law directed HUD and EPA to require the disclosure of known information on LBP and LBP hazards before the sale or lease of most housing built before 1978. Most private housing, public housing, or federally owned or subsidized housing is affected by this rule. Under OSHA, LCP is defined as any paint with any detectable amount of lead present in it. Therefore, all LBP is considered LCP. Conversely, LCP may not meet the criteria to be considered LBP in accordance with HUD guidelines or some states’ definition of LBP. It is important to note that LCP may create a lead hazard when being removed. The condition of Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 38 these materials must be monitored when they are being disturbed. In the event LCP is subject to abrading, sanding, torching, and/or cutting during demolition or renovation activities, there may be regulatory issues that must be addressed. The information below is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute a lead hazard evaluation. In addition, the information is not intended to comply with federal, state, or local regulations in regards to LBP. In buildings constructed after 1978, it is unlikely that LBP is present; however, some paints utilized after 1978 will be LCP under OSHA. Structures built prior to 1978 and especially prior to the 1960s should be expected to contain LBP. Due to the age of the subject property building, there is a potential that LBP is present. All observed painted surfaces were in good condition and are not expected to pose a health and safety concern to the occupants of the subject property at this time. Local regulations may apply to LBP in association with building demolition/renovations and worker/occupant protection. Actual material samples would need to be collected or an XRF survey performed in order to determine if LBP is present. It should be noted that construction activities that disturb materials or paints containing any amount of lead may be subject to certain requirements of the OSHA lead standard contained in 29 CFR 1910.1025 and 1926.62. 8.3 RADON Radon is a naturally-occurring, odorless, and invisible gas. Natural radon levels vary and are closely related to geologic formations. Radon may enter buildings through basement sumps or other openings. The United States EPA has prepared a map to assist National, State, and local organizations to target their resources and to implement radon-resistant building codes. The map divides the country into three radon zones, with Zone 1 being those areas with the average predicted indoor radon concentration in residential dwellings exceeding the EPA Action Limit of 4.0 pCi/L. It is important to note that the EPA has found homes with elevated levels of radon in all three zones, and the EPA recommends site specific testing in order to determine radon levels at a specific location. However, the map does give a valuable indication of the propensity of radon gas accumulation in structures. Radon sampling was not requested as part of this assessment. According to the US EPA, the radon zone level for the area is Zone 2, which has a predicted average indoor screening level between 2 pCi/L and 4 pCi/L, equal to or below the action level of 4 pCi/L set forth by the US EPA. 8.4 MOLD/INDOOR AIR QUALITY ISSUES Molds are simple microscopic organisms which can often be seen in the form of discoloration, frequently green, gray, white, brown, or black. When excessive moisture or water accumulates indoors, mold growth may occur, particularly if the moisture problem remains undiscovered or unaddressed. As such, interior areas of buildings characterized by poor ventilation and high humidity are the most common locations of mold growth. Building materials, including drywall, wallpaper, baseboards, wood framing, insulation, and carpeting, often play host to such growth. Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 39 Mold spores primarily cause health problems through the inhalation of spores or the toxins they emit when they are present in large numbers. This can occur when there is active mold growth within places where people live or work. Mold, if present, may or may not visually manifest itself. Neither the individual completing this inspection, nor AEI has any liability for the identification of mold-related concerns except as defined in applicable industry standards. In short, this Phase I ESA should not be construed as a mold survey or inspection. This activity was not designed to discover all areas which may be affected by mold growth on the subject property. Rather, it is intended to give the client an indication if significant (based on observed areas) mold growth is present at the subject property. Potential areas of mold growth, such as in pipe chases, HVAC systems, and behind enclosed walls and ceilings, were not observed as part of this limited assessment. AEI observed interior areas of the subject property building to identify the potential presence of mold. AEI did not note obvious visual or olfactory indications of the presence of mold, nor did AEI observe obvious indications of significant water damage. As such, no bulk sampling of suspect surfaces was conducted as part of this assessment and no additional action with respect to suspect mold appears to be warranted at this time. Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 40 9.0 SIGNATURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR Part 312. We have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Prepared By:Reviewed By: Christopher Olsen Nicole Burns Associate Consultant Senior Author Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 41 10.0 REFERENCES Item Date(s)Source Soils Information Accessed August 2018 USDA Web Soil Survey http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/ app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx Topographic Map 2012 USGS, Cupertino Depth to Groundwater Information February 19, 1991 SCVWD, LUST Case Closure Recommendation for Mariani Fruit Packing Plant - 10930 North De Anza Boulevard (located adjacent to the east) Aerial Photographs 1939-2012 (non-inclusive) Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Sanborn Map Report/Search July 26, 2018 (No Coverage Letter) Environmental Data Resources, Inc. City Directories 1968-2017 (non-inclusive) Environmental Data Resources, Inc. and Cupertino Public Library Environmental Health Department/ State Environmental Agency July 26, 2018 Santa Clara County Environmental Health Department Fire Department July 26, 2018 Santa Clara County Fire Department Building Department August 6, 2018 Cupertino Building Department Planning Department August 6, 2018 Cupertino Planning Department Assessor's Information and Parcel Map August 6, 2018 Santa Clara County Assessor's Office Other Agencies Searched July 26, 2018 SWRCB Geotracker, DTSC HWTS, and DTSC Envirostor databases, and BAAQMD Oil and Gas Wells July 26, 2018 Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources Oil and Gas Pipelines July 26, 2018 NPMS Public Map Viewer https://www.npms.phmsa.dot.gov/ PublicViewer/composite.jsf State Environmental Superliens July 26, 2018 NETR Online Environmental Lien and AUL State Statutes website http://environmental.netronline.com/ lienStatutes.aspx Property Transfer Laws July 26, 2018 Regulatory Database Report July 26, 2018 EDR Interview with Owner August 6, 2018 Mr. Brian Tjader Interview with Key Site Manager August 6, 2018 Mr. Erik Bergman Radon Zone Information 1993 US EPA Map of Radon Zones https://www.epa.gov/radon Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Page 42 APPENDIX A FIGURES Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Topographic Maps may be obtained from http://historicalmaps.arcgis.com/usgs/ Legend Approximate Property Boundary Source: USGS Topographic Map Cupertino, California (2012) Figure 1: TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014 Project Number: 392233 See instructional text on Figure 2 above. Legend 1 – Office/customer lounge; 2 – Tire warehouse Estimated Groundwater Flow Direction 3 – New oil AST; 4 – Used oil AST in enclosure Approximate Property Boundary 5 – Auto service area; 6 – Clarifier; C - Compressors Listed in Environmental Database Report * D – Dumpsters; T – Pad-mounted transformer Figure 2: SITE MAP 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014 Project Number: 392233 North De Anza Boulevard Driveway Cupertino Hotel 10889 North De Anza Boulevard Ulta Beauty 20580 Homestead Road * Stein Mart 20600 Homestead Road Rite Aid 20572 Homestead Road * Multi-tenant retail building 10991 North De Anza Boulevard Aviare Apartments 20415 Via Paviso * Goodyear 10931 * 1 2 C 3 4 D T 5 5 6 APPENDIX B PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 1. Western side of the subject property building 2. Northern side of the subject property building Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 3. Southern side of the subject property building 4. Eastern side of the subject property building Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 5. Eastern side of the subject property building 6. Clarifier adjacent to the northern side of the subject property building Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 7. Interior of the clarifier 8. Asphalt-paved parking/drive area on the subject property Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 9. Paved driveway north of the subject property building 10. Dumpsters adjacent to the southern side of the subject property building Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 11. Pad-mounted transformer near the southeastern corner of the subject property building 12. Enclosure at the southern end of the building Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 13. Waste oil AST in the enclosure on the southern side of the building 14. Empty drums and an anti-freeze drum in the enclosure on the southern side of the building Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 15. Surface staining adjacent to the AST in the enclosure 16. Interior of the automotive service area Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 17. Automotive service area 18. Interior of the automotive service area Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 19. Scrap metal container in the automotive service building 20. 55-gallon drum with oil-containing absorbent Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 21. 55-gallon drums of used aerosol cans and used antifreeze 22. 55-gallon drums of used oil filters Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 23. 55-gallon drums of motor oil and automatic transmission fluid 24. Alignment rack in the automotive service area Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 25. Below ground hoist in the automotive service area 26. Floor drain in the automotive service area Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 27. Floor drain with oily substance in the automotive service area 28. Overview of the store room Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 29. Parts storage area 30. Tire storage area Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 31. Compressor 32. Compressor Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 33. 55-gallon drums of oil in the store room 34. New oil AST in the store room Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 35. Floor sink in the automotive service area 36. Mop buckets in the automotive service area Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 37. Office area 38. Showroom/customer lounge Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 39. Ulta Beauty (20580 Homestead Road) adjacent to the west 40. Cupertino Hotel (10889 North De Anza Boulevard) adjacent to the south Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 41. Multi-tenant retail building (10991 North De Anza Boulevard) adjacent to the north 42. Rite Aid (20572 Homestead Road) adjacent to the north Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 43. Aviare Apartments (20415 Via Paviso) adjacent to the east Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 APPENDIX C REGULATORY DATABASE Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 FORM-LBI-ASH tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com 392233 10931 North De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA 95014 Inquiry Number: 5374254.2s July 26, 2018 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 201 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM GeoCheck - Not Requested TC5374254.2s Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5374254.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 10931 NORTH DE ANZA BOULEVARD CUPERTINO, CA 95014 COORDINATES 37.3361710 - 37˚ 20’ 10.21’’Latitude (North): 122.0328440 - 122˚ 1’ 58.23’’Longitude (West): Zone 10Universal Tranverse Mercator: 585676.6UTM X (Meters): 4132400.5UTM Y (Meters): 213 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 5640178 CUPERTINO, CATarget Property Map: 2012Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20140606Portions of Photo from: USDASource: 5374254.2s Page 2 G39 ARCO PRODUCTS COMPAN 10625 N DEANZA BLVD HIST UST, HAZNET Higher 1307, 0.248, South G38 ARCO #6111 10625 N DE ANZA BLVD LUST, HIST LUST Higher 1307, 0.248, South G37 CUPERTINO SMOG & AUT 10625 N DE ANZA BL UST Higher 1307, 0.248, South G36 CUPERTINO SMOG & AUT 10625 N DE ANZA BL LUST, SWEEPS UST, HIST UST, CUPA Listings, CERS... Higher 1307, 0.248, South G35 ARCO 10625 DE ANZA HIST CORTESE Higher 1300, 0.246, South F34 ONE HOUR MOTOPHOTO 20670 HOMESTEAD RD RCRA NonGen / NLR, FINDS, ECHO, HAZNET Higher 847, 0.160, WNW F33 THREE SEVEN 1 HR PHO 20670 HOMESTEAD RD CUPA Listings Higher 847, 0.160, WNW F32 ROSS STORE #1733 20650 HOMESTEAD RD CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS Higher 847, 0.160, WNW F31 MICHAEL’S STORE # 68 20640 HOMESTEAD RD CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS Higher 680, 0.129, WNW F30 MICHAELS STORE #6818 20640 HOMESTEAD RD CUPA Listings Higher 680, 0.129, WNW 29 95954 10023 SNYVLE SRTGA R HIST UST Lower 643, 0.122, NNW E28 CHEVRON STATION #957 11010 DE ANZA BL CERS, CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS TANKS Lower 552, 0.105, NNE E27 CHEVRON STATIONS INC 11010 N DE ANZA BLVD EDR Hist Auto Lower 552, 0.105, NNE E26 CHEVRON STATION NO 9 11010 N DE ANZA BLVD RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO, HAZNET Lower 552, 0.105, NNE E25 95700 11010 NO DEANZA BLVD HIST UST, CHMIRS Lower 552, 0.105, NNE E24 CHEVRON SERVICE STAT 11010 N DE ANZA BL UST Lower 552, 0.105, NNE E23 95700 11010 N DE ANZA BLVD LUST, HIST LUST, SWEEPS UST, HIST UST, CHMIRS,... Lower 552, 0.105, NNE E22 CHEVRON 11010 DE ANZA HIST CORTESE Lower 552, 0.105, NNE E21 CHEVRON STATION #957 11010 DE ANZA BL UST Lower 552, 0.105, NNE D20 SAFEWAY STORE 3251 20620 HOMESTEAD RD CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS Higher 491, 0.093, WNW D19 SAFEWAY STORE #3251 20620 HOMESTEAD RD CUPA Listings, HAZNET Higher 491, 0.093, WNW D18 SAFEWAY STORE #3251 20620 HOMESTEAD RD RCRA-LQG Higher 491, 0.093, WNW D17 SAFEWAY STORE 3251 20620 HOMESTEAD RD RCRA-LQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 491, 0.093, WNW C16 ULTA BEAUTY #777 20580 HOMESTEAD RD CUPA Listings, HAZNET Higher 442, 0.084, NW C15 RITE AID NO 5967 20580 HOMESTEAD AVE RCRA-CESQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 442, 0.084, NW C14 ULTA BEAUTY 20580 HOMESTEAD RD CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS Higher 442, 0.084, NW C13 RITE AID STORE NO 59 20572 HOMESTEAD ROAD CUPA Listings, HAZNET, CERS HAZ WASTE, CIWQS Lower 352, 0.067, NW C12 RITE AID NO 5967 20572 HOMESTEAD RD RCRA-CESQG Lower 352, 0.067, NW B11 MOBIL SERVICE STATIO 11025 N DE ANZA BLVD SWEEPS UST, HIST UST Lower 227, 0.043, North B10 CARLOS CORONA INCORP 11025 N DE ANZA BLVD EDR Hist Auto Lower 227, 0.043, North B9 DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR 11025 N DE ANZA BL UST Lower 227, 0.043, North B8 CUPERTINO AUTO SERVI 11025 N DE ANZA BL CUPA Listings Lower 227, 0.043, North B7 DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR 11025 N DE ANZA BL SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST, CUPA Listings, CERS TANKS,... Lower 227, 0.043, North B6 CARLOS’ AUTO REPAIR 11025 N DE ANZA BL CUPA Listings Lower 227, 0.043, North B5 MOBIL 11025 DE ANZA BLVD LUST, HIST LUST, HIST CORTESE, CERS Lower 187, 0.035, NNE A4 MARIANI PACKING 10930 DE ANZA BLVD LUST, HIST LUST, HIST CORTESE, CERS Lower 122, 0.023, East A3 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBB 10931 N DE ANZA BL FINDS TP A2 GOODYEAR AUTO SERVIC 10931 N DE ANZA BLVD HAZNET TP A1 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBB 10931 N DE ANZA BL HIST UST, CUPA Listings, CERS HAZ WASTE, CERS TP MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 10931 NORTH DE ANZA BOULEVARD CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 5374254.2s Page 3 57 CUPERTINO VILLAGE CL 10989 NORTH WOLFE RO ENVIROSTOR, VCP Lower 4952, 0.938, East 56 DAVIDSON CHEVROLET/G 20955 STEVENS CREEK ENVIROSTOR, LUST, HIST LUST, SWEEPS UST, HIST... Higher 4769, 0.903, SSW 55 SHELL OIL COMPANY 1695 HOLLENBECK AVE LUST, HIST LUST, EMI, HIST CORTESE, CERS Higher 2576, 0.488, WNW J54 FOUR-PHASE SYSTEMS 10500 N DE ANZA BLVD LUST, HIST UST Higher 2475, 0.469, South J53 APPLE COMPUTER 10500 N DE ANZA BLVD LUST, HIST LUST, RCRA NonGen / NLR, FINDS, ECHO,... Higher 2475, 0.469, South 52 APPLE COMPUTER INC 10500 DE ANZA HIST CORTESE Higher 2374, 0.450, SSE J51 CUPERTINO NURSERY 10431 N DE ANZA BLVD LUST, HIST LUST, HIST CORTESE, CERS Higher 2362, 0.447, South I50 SPEEDEE OIL CHANGE & 695 W HOMESTEAD RD RCRA-SQG, LUST, FINDS, ECHO, HAZNET Higher 2328, 0.441, WNW I49 TEXACO/EXXON 695 W HOMESTEAD RD LUST, HIST LUST Higher 2328, 0.441, WNW I48 TEXACO/EXXON 695 W HOMESTEAD RD LUST, HIST UST, CERS Higher 2328, 0.441, WNW I47 TEXACO EXXON 695 HOMESTEAD HIST CORTESE Higher 2188, 0.414, WNW 46 APPLE INC 20400 MARIANI AVENUE RCRA-LQG, CPS-SLIC, BROWNFIELDS, FINDS, ECHO, EMI,...Higher 2135, 0.404, SSE G45 FOUR-PHASE SYSTEMS I 10700 N DE ANZA BLVD ENVIROSTOR Higher 1393, 0.264, South G44 FOUR-PHASE SYSTEMS I 10700 N DE ANZA BLVD HIST UST, HWP, CERS Higher 1393, 0.264, South G43 MOTOROLA FOUR PHASE 10700 N DE ANZA BLVD CORRACTS, RCRA-TSDF, RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 1393, 0.264, South H42 TIMEX CORPORATION 20650 VALLEY GREEN D CPS-SLIC, CERS Higher 1334, 0.253, SSW H41 TIMEX CORPORATION 20650 VALLEY GREEN D CPS-SLIC Higher 1334, 0.253, SSW H40 TIMEX 20650 VALLEY GREEN D SEMS-ARCHIVE, RCRA NonGen / NLR Higher 1334, 0.253, SSW MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 10931 NORTH DE ANZA BOULEVARD CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5374254.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this property see page 8 of the attached EDR Radius Map report: EPA IDDatabase(s)Site GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBB 10931 N DE ANZA BL CUPERTINO, CA 95014 N/AHIST UST Facility Id: 00000008251 CUPA Listings Database: CUPA SANTA CLARA, Date of Government Version: 05/16/2018 CERS HAZ WASTE CERS GOODYEAR AUTO SERVIC 10931 N DE ANZA BLVD CUPERTINO, CA 95014 N/AHAZNET GEPAID: CAL000013487 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBB 10931 N DE ANZA BL CUPERTINO, CA 95014 N/AFINDS Registry ID:: 110066423524 DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5374254.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE State Response Sites State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database SWRCY Recycler Database HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands ODI Open Dump Inventory DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database SCH School Property Evaluation Program CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5374254.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 Local Land Records LIENS Environmental Liens Listing LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan Cortese "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5374254.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities EMI Emissions Inventory Data ENF Enforcement Action Listing Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing ICE ICE HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database MINES Mines Site Location Listing MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing NPDES NPDES Permits Listing PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing PROC Certified Processors Database Notify 65 Proposition 65 Records SAN JOSE HAZMAT Hazardous Material Facilities UIC UIC Listing WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing WDS Waste Discharge System WIP Well Investigation Program Case List PROJECT PROJECT (GEOTRACKER) NON-CASE INFO NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER) MILITARY PRIV SITES MILITARY PRIV SITES (GEOTRACKER) CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System UIC GEO UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER) OTHER OIL GAS OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER) PROD WATER PONDS PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER) WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) SAMPLING POINT SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER) EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5374254.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. A review of the SEMS-ARCHIVE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/18/2018 has revealed that there is 1 SEMS-ARCHIVE site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ TIMEX 20650 VALLEY GREEN D SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.253 mi.) H40 136 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: CORRACTS is a list of handlers with RCRA Corrective Action Activity. This report shows which nationally-defined corrective action core events have occurred for every handler that has had corrective action activity. A review of the CORRACTS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there is 1 CORRACTS site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MOTOROLA FOUR PHASE 10700 N DE ANZA BLVD S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.264 mi.) G43 140 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. A review of the RCRA-TSDF list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-TSDF site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MOTOROLA FOUR PHASE 10700 N DE ANZA BLVD S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.264 mi.) G43 140 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5374254.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-LQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there are 2 RCRA-LQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SAFEWAY STORE 3251 20620 HOMESTEAD RD WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.093 mi.) D17 63 SAFEWAY STORE #3251 20620 HOMESTEAD RD WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.093 mi.) D18 65 RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-SQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CHEVRON STATION NO 9 11010 N DE ANZA BLVD NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.105 mi.) E26 88 RCRA-CESQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-CESQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there are 2 RCRA-CESQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ RITE AID NO 5967 20580 HOMESTEAD AVE NW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) C15 58 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ RITE AID NO 5967 20572 HOMESTEAD RD NW 0 - 1/8 (0.067 mi.) C12 41 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5374254.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/30/2018 has revealed that there are 3 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FOUR-PHASE SYSTEMS I 10700 N DE ANZA BLVD S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.264 mi.) G45 146 Facility Id: 80001514 Status: No Action Required DAVIDSON CHEVROLET/G 20955 STEVENS CREEK SSW 1/2 - 1 (0.903 mi.) 56 183 Facility Id: 60001047 Status: Refer: 1248 Local Agency PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CUPERTINO VILLAGE CL 10989 NORTH WOLFE RO E 1/2 - 1 (0.938 mi.) 57 187 Facility Id: 60000385 Status: Active State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 12 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CUPERTINO SMOG & AUT 10625 N DE ANZA BL S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) G36 115 Database: LUST SANTA CLARA, Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Date Closed: 06/27/2001 Global Id: T0608500155 SCVWD ID: 07S2W12P01F ARCO #6111 10625 N DE ANZA BLVD S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) G38 134 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Facility Status: Case Closed EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5374254.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 date9: 6/27/2001 TEXACO/EXXON 695 W HOMESTEAD RD WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.441 mi.) I48 164 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0608501427 TEXACO/EXXON 695 W HOMESTEAD RD WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.441 mi.) I49 167 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Facility Status: Case Closed date9: 1/23/1996 SPEEDEE OIL CHANGE & 695 W HOMESTEAD RD WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.441 mi.) I50 167 Database: LUST SANTA CLARA, Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Date Closed: 01/23/1996 SCVWD ID: 07S2W12E01F CUPERTINO NURSERY 10431 N DE ANZA BLVD S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.447 mi.) J51 171 Database: LUST SANTA CLARA, Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Date Closed: 01/24/1992 Global Id: T0608500480 SCVWD ID: 07S2W13C01F date9: 1/24/1992 APPLE COMPUTER 10500 N DE ANZA BLVD S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.469 mi.) J53 173 Database: LUST SANTA CLARA, Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Facility Status: Preliminary site assessment underway Date Closed: 01/17/1991 SCVWD ID: 07S2W12Q01F date9: 1/17/1991 FOUR-PHASE SYSTEMS 10500 N DE ANZA BLVD S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.469 mi.) J54 176 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0608500147 SHELL OIL COMPANY 1695 HOLLENBECK AVE WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.488 mi.) 55 179 Database: LUST SANTA CLARA, Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Pollution Characterization Date Closed: 10/22/2004 Global Id: T0608501263 SCVWD ID: 07S2W11H01F PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MARIANI PACKING 10930 DE ANZA BLVD E 0 - 1/8 (0.023 mi.) A4 21 Database: LUST SANTA CLARA, Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5374254.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 Date Closed: 02/19/1991 Global Id: T0608500867 SCVWD ID: 07S2W12G01F date9: 2/19/1991 MOBIL 11025 DE ANZA BLVD NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.035 mi.) B5 24 Database: LUST SANTA CLARA, Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Date Closed: 02/01/1999 Global Id: T0608500257 SCVWD ID: 07S2W12F01F date9: 2/1/1999 95700 11010 N DE ANZA BLVD NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.105 mi.) E23 78 Database: LUST SANTA CLARA, Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Database: LUST REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Date Closed: 08/02/2001 Global Id: T0608500238 SCVWD ID: 07S2W12G02F date9: 8/2/2001 CPS-SLIC: Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the CPS-SLIC list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 3 CPS-SLIC sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ TIMEX CORPORATION 20650 VALLEY GREEN D SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.253 mi.) H41 139 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0608591755 TIMEX CORPORATION 20650 VALLEY GREEN D SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.253 mi.) H42 139 Database: SLIC REG 2, Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Facility Id: 43-1927 APPLE INC 20400 MARIANI AVENUE SSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.404 mi.) 46 148 Database: CPS-SLIC, Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Facility Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: SL0608533305 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5374254.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 HIST LUST: A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. A review of the HIST LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/29/2005 has revealed that there are 8 HIST LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ARCO #6111 10625 N DE ANZA BLVD S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) G38 134 SCVWD ID: 07S2W12P01 TEXACO/EXXON 695 W HOMESTEAD RD WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.441 mi.) I49 167 SCVWD ID: 07S2W12E01 CUPERTINO NURSERY 10431 N DE ANZA BLVD S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.447 mi.) J51 171 SCVWD ID: 07S2W13C01 APPLE COMPUTER 10500 N DE ANZA BLVD S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.469 mi.) J53 173 SCVWD ID: 07S2W12Q01 SHELL OIL COMPANY 1695 HOLLENBECK AVE WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.488 mi.) 55 179 SCVWD ID: 07S2W11H01 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MARIANI PACKING 10930 DE ANZA BLVD E 0 - 1/8 (0.023 mi.) A4 21 SCVWD ID: 07S2W12G01 MOBIL 11025 DE ANZA BLVD NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.035 mi.) B5 24 SCVWD ID: 07S2W12F01 95700 11010 N DE ANZA BLVD NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.105 mi.) E23 78 SCVWD ID: 07S2W12G02 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board’s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 4 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CUPERTINO SMOG & AUT 10625 N DE ANZA BL S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) G37 133 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Facility Id: 32 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR 11025 N DE ANZA BL N 0 - 1/8 (0.043 mi.) B9 38 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Facility Id: 34 CHEVRON STATION #957 11010 DE ANZA BL NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.105 mi.) E21 78 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5374254.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14 Facility Id: 2096-12-77 CHEVRON SERVICE STAT 11010 N DE ANZA BL NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.105 mi.) E24 86 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Facility Id: 33 State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process. A review of the BROWNFIELDS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/26/2018 has revealed that there is 1 BROWNFIELDS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ APPLE INC 20400 MARIANI AVENUE SSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.404 mi.) 46 148 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites CERS HAZ WASTE: List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, and RCRA LQ HW Generator programs. A review of the CERS HAZ WASTE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/23/2018 has revealed that there are 8 CERS HAZ WASTE sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ULTA BEAUTY 20580 HOMESTEAD RD NW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) C14 54 SAFEWAY STORE 3251 20620 HOMESTEAD RD WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.093 mi.) D20 70 MICHAEL’S STORE # 68 20640 HOMESTEAD RD WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.129 mi.) F31 106 ROSS STORE #1733 20650 HOMESTEAD RD WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.160 mi.) F32 109 CUPERTINO SMOG & AUT 10625 N DE ANZA BL S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) G36 115 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR 11025 N DE ANZA BL N 0 - 1/8 (0.043 mi.) B7 27 RITE AID STORE NO 59 20572 HOMESTEAD ROAD NW 0 - 1/8 (0.067 mi.) C13 46 CHEVRON STATION #957 11010 DE ANZA BL NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.105 mi.) E28 93 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5374254.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15 4 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CUPERTINO SMOG & AUT 10625 N DE ANZA BL S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) G36 115 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 27088 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR 11025 N DE ANZA BL N 0 - 1/8 (0.043 mi.) B7 27 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 502 MOBIL SERVICE STATIO 11025 N DE ANZA BLVD N 0 - 1/8 (0.043 mi.) B11 39 Comp Number: 39585 95700 11010 N DE ANZA BLVD NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.105 mi.) E23 78 Status: A Comp Number: 62800 HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database. A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 6 HIST UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CUPERTINO SMOG & AUT 10625 N DE ANZA BL S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) G36 115 Facility Id: 00000027088 ARCO PRODUCTS COMPAN 10625 N DEANZA BLVD S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) G39 134 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MOBIL SERVICE STATIO 11025 N DE ANZA BLVD N 0 - 1/8 (0.043 mi.) B11 39 Facility Id: 00000039585 95700 11010 N DE ANZA BLVD NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.105 mi.) E23 78 Facility Id: 00000062800 95700 11010 NO DEANZA BLVD NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.105 mi.) E25 87 95954 10023 SNYVLE SRTGA R NNW 0 - 1/8 (0.122 mi.) 29 105 Facility Id: 00000062833 CA FID UST: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there is 1 CA FID UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR 11025 N DE ANZA BL N 0 - 1/8 (0.043 mi.) B7 27 Facility Id: 43000407 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5374254.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16 Status: A Status: I CERS TANKS: List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. A review of the CERS TANKS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/23/2018 has revealed that there are 3 CERS TANKS sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CUPERTINO SMOG & AUT 10625 N DE ANZA BL S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) G36 115 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR 11025 N DE ANZA BL N 0 - 1/8 (0.043 mi.) B7 27 CHEVRON STATION #957 11010 DE ANZA BL NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.105 mi.) E28 93 Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA NonGen / NLR site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ONE HOUR MOTOPHOTO 20670 HOMESTEAD RD WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.160 mi.) F34 113 CUPA Listings: A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. A review of the CUPA Listings list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 9 CUPA Listings sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ULTA BEAUTY #777 20580 HOMESTEAD RD NW 0 - 1/8 (0.084 mi.) C16 61 Database: CUPA SANTA CLARA, Date of Government Version: 05/16/2018 SAFEWAY STORE #3251 20620 HOMESTEAD RD WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.093 mi.) D19 68 Database: CUPA SANTA CLARA, Date of Government Version: 05/16/2018 MICHAELS STORE #6818 20640 HOMESTEAD RD WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.129 mi.) F30 106 Database: CUPA SANTA CLARA, Date of Government Version: 05/16/2018 THREE SEVEN 1 HR PHO 20670 HOMESTEAD RD WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.160 mi.) F33 113 Database: CUPA SANTA CLARA, Date of Government Version: 05/16/2018 CUPERTINO SMOG & AUT 10625 N DE ANZA BL S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) G36 115 Database: CUPA SANTA CLARA, Date of Government Version: 05/16/2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5374254.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 17 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CARLOS’ AUTO REPAIR 11025 N DE ANZA BL N 0 - 1/8 (0.043 mi.) B6 26 Database: CUPA SANTA CLARA, Date of Government Version: 05/16/2018 DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR 11025 N DE ANZA BL N 0 - 1/8 (0.043 mi.) B7 27 Database: CUPA SANTA CLARA, Date of Government Version: 05/16/2018 CUPERTINO AUTO SERVI 11025 N DE ANZA BL N 0 - 1/8 (0.043 mi.) B8 38 Database: CUPA SANTA CLARA, Date of Government Version: 05/16/2018 RITE AID STORE NO 59 20572 HOMESTEAD ROAD NW 0 - 1/8 (0.067 mi.) C13 46 Database: CUPA SANTA CLARA, Date of Government Version: 05/16/2018 HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 8 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ARCO 10625 DE ANZA S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.246 mi.) G35 115 Reg Id: 43-0087 TEXACO EXXON 695 HOMESTEAD WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.414 mi.) I47 164 Reg Id: 43-1456 CUPERTINO NURSERY 10431 N DE ANZA BLVD S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.447 mi.) J51 171 Reg Id: 43-0430 APPLE COMPUTER INC 10500 DE ANZA SSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.450 mi.) 52 173 Reg Id: 43-0079 SHELL OIL COMPANY 1695 HOLLENBECK AVE WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.488 mi.) 55 179 Reg Id: 43-1285 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MARIANI PACKING 10930 DE ANZA BLVD E 0 - 1/8 (0.023 mi.) A4 21 Reg Id: 43-0856 MOBIL 11025 DE ANZA BLVD NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.035 mi.) B5 24 Reg Id: 43-0193 CHEVRON 11010 DE ANZA NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.105 mi.) E22 78 Reg Id: 43-0172 HWP: Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. A review of the HWP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/21/2018 has revealed that there is 1 HWP site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ FOUR-PHASE SYSTEMS I 10700 N DE ANZA BLVD S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.264 mi.) G44 144 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5374254.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 18 EPA Id: CAD990794158 Cleanup Status: UNDERGOING CLOSURE EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR Hist Auto: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR Hist Auto list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 EDR Hist Auto sites within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CARLOS CORONA INCORP 11025 N DE ANZA BLVD N 0 - 1/8 (0.043 mi.) B10 38 CHEVRON STATIONS INC 11010 N DE ANZA BLVD NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.105 mi.) E27 92 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5374254.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 19 Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 2 records. Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________ FRANCISCO A SERRANO LUST, HIST LUST, HIST UST UNOCAL #5428 LUST EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.110 kV16016 0 200200200 200 240240 2 40 28 0 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 1 NR 0 1 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 2 NR NR NR 0 2 0.250RCRA-LQG 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250RCRA-SQG 2 NR NR NR 0 2 0.250RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS State- and tribal - equivalent NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000RESPONSE State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 3 NR 2 1 0 0 1.000ENVIROSTOR State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 12 NR NR 7 2 3 0.500LUST TC5374254.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST 3 NR NR 3 0 0 0.500CPS-SLIC 8 NR NR 4 1 3 0.500HIST LUST State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST 4 NR NR NR 1 3 0.250UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP State and tribal Brownfields sites 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WMUDS/SWAT 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHAULERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HIST Cal-Sites 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SCH 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Toxic Pits 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL 9 NR NR NR 3 5 0.250 1CERS HAZ WASTE Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 4 NR NR NR 1 3 0.250SWEEPS UST 7 NR NR NR 2 4 0.250 1HIST UST 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250CA FID UST 3 NR NR NR 1 2 0.250CERS TANKS Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS TC5374254.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEED Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLDS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMCS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 90 Other Ascertainable Records 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250ABANDONED MINES 1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1FINDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPECHO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOCKET HWC 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CA BOND EXP. PLAN 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500Cortese 10 NR NR NR 3 6 0.250 1CUPA Listings TC5374254.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEMI 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPENF 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance 1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1HAZNET 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICE 8 NR NR 4 1 3 0.500HIST CORTESE 1 NR 0 1 0 0 1.000HWP 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HWT 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MWMP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPEST LIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PROC 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Notify 65 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SAN JOSE HAZMAT 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WASTEWATER PITS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPWDS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250WIP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPROJECT 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNON-CASE INFO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMILITARY PRIV SITES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCIWQS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC GEO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPOTHER OIL GAS 1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1CERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPROD WATER PONDS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPWELL STIM PROJ 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSAMPLING POINT EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP 2 NR NR NR NR 2 0.125EDR Hist Auto 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LUST 88 0 2 24 16 40 6- Totals -- NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC5374254.2s Page 7 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation gallon used oil tank. Per facility, a tank assessment has not been performed for the 1 x 220Violation Notes: controls (if applicable) are suitably designed to meet the regulation. the foundation, structural support, seams, connections, and pressure hazardous waste, and that the tanks and containment system including integrity, is acceptable for the transferring, storing and treating of that, the new hazardous waste tank system has sufficient structural placing the tank system in service. The written assessment shall state certified by an independent, qualified, professional engineer prior to Failure to obtain and maintain a written assessment reviewed andViolation Description: Chapter 15, Section(s) 66265.192(a) 22 CCR 15 66265.192(a) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 09-08-2017Violation Date: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COSite Name: 120218Site ID: Violations: Hazardous Waste GeneratorCERS Description: 10344415CERS ID: 120218Site ID: CERS HAZ WASTE: FA0200739Facility ID: PR0313936Record ID: -122.03259Longitude: 37.33675Latitude: GENERATES 100 KG YR TO <5 TONS/YRProgram Description: 2205PE#: SANTA CLARARegion: CUPA SANTA CLARA: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000200Tank Capacity: 1973Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: CUPERTINO, CA 95014Owner City,St,Zip: 10931 NO DEANZA BLVDOwner Address: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO.Owner Name: 4082552166Telephone: JOHN DONOVANContact Name: AUTO SERVICE CENTEROther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000008251Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: Site 1 of 4 in cluster A CERS Actual: 213 ft. Property CERS HAZ WASTECUPERTINO, CA 95014 Target CUPA Listings10931 N DE ANZA BL N/A A1 HIST USTGOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO U001600994 TC5374254.2s Page 8 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation characteristics of the Hazardous Waste, and starting accumulation name and address of the generator, physical and chemical portable tanks with the following requirements: "Hazardous Waste", Failure to properly label hazardous waste accumulation containers andViolation Description: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.34(f) 22 CCR 12 66262.34(f) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 09-08-2017Violation Date: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COSite Name: 120218Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: material before disposal. 5 gallons are completely empty of free flowing liquids and scrap able pourable amounts of product present. Ensure that all containers under Observed 1 x quart bottle of injection fluid in the trash withViolation Notes: shall be managed within one year of being emptied. of this section shall be marked with the date it has been emptied and five gallons in capacity which is managed pursuant to subsection (e) (f) A container or an inner liner removed from a container larger than inner liner back to the supplier for the purpose of being refilled. (e)(2) or (e)(3) of this section; or (i) By shipping the container or to managing the container or inner liner pursuant to subsections or to another intermediate collection location for accumulation prior liner; or (4) By shipping the container or inner liner to a supplier person who reconditions or remanufactures the container or inner for subsequent reuse, or shipping the container or inner liner to a reconditioning or remanufacturing the container or inner liner onsite liner to a person who reclaims its scrap value; or (3) By reclaiming its scrap value onsite or shipping the container or inner CCR 11 66261.7 including but not limited to the following: (e)(2)By that previously held a hazardous material/waste in accordance with 22 Failure to manage empty containers greater than 5 gallons in capacityViolation Description: 11, Section(s) 66261.7 22 CCR 11 66261.7 - California Code of Regulations, Title 22, ChapterCitation: 09-08-2017Violation Date: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COSite Name: 120218Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: dated 7/14/17. records for waste coolant were unavailable for review except for one Per facility waste coolant is disposed of once a month. DisposalViolation Notes: General Hazardous Waste Generator Program - Administration/Documentation -Violation Description: 6.5, Section(s) Multiple Sections HSC 6.5 Multiple Sections - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 09-08-2017Violation Date: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COSite Name: 120218Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (Continued) U001600994 TC5374254.2s Page 9 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation information container must be labelled with the date the satellite labelled with the words Hazardous Waste including specified date that hazardous waste is first placed in the container and the operator the container must be clearly marked with the initial near the initial point of accumulation which was under the control of gallons of hazardous waste or one quart of acute hazardous waste at or including but not limited to the following: accumulate up to 55 Failed to meet the conditions of satellite accumulation regulations,Violation Description: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.34(e) 22 CCR 12 66262.34(e) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 09-08-2017Violation Date: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COSite Name: 120218Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: environment. liquids to minimize the event of an unplanned release into the areas are clean and free of saturated absorbent and free flowing there "for years" Ensure that secondary containment and surrounding containment areas. Per facility, the absorbent has been accumulating containment and free flowing amounts of used oil in the secondary Observed saturated absorbent on the floor surrounding the secondaryViolation Notes: the environment. to air, soil, or surface water which could threaten human health or non-sudden release of hazardous waste or hazardous waste constituents possibility of a fire, explosion, or any unplanned sudden or Failure to maintain and operate the facility to minimize theViolation Description: 1, Section(s) 265.31 40 CFR 1 265.31 - U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, ChapterCitation: 09-08-2017Violation Date: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COSite Name: 120218Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: inspections are not being conducted. attached to 1 x 220 gallon used oil tank. Per facility daily Observed incomplete entries in the daily tank log inspection bookViolation Notes: the facility. systems each operating day and retain records of those inspections at Failure to conduct and document inspections of hazardous waste tankViolation Description: Chapter 15, Section(s) 66265.195(c) 22 CCR 15 66265.195(c) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 09-08-2017Violation Date: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COSite Name: 120218Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: waste coolant markings: 3 x 15 gallon used oil rollers 1 x 120 gallon container of The following containers were missing complete hazardous wasteViolation Notes: date. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (Continued) U001600994 TC5374254.2s Page 10 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation gallon drum of oily debris (paper filters) 1 x 55 gallon drum of waste waste coolant 3 x 55 gallon drums of drained used oil filters 1 x 55 site: 1 x 220 gallon tank of used oil 1 x 120 gallon container of accumulation areas and dumpsters Observed the following wastes on inspected include service bays, back storage room, hazardous waste On site to conduct a routine hazardous waste inspection AreasEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: YesViolations Found: 09-08-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Ocupancy ID: 2067Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-27-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2067Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 02-09-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: determination and if determined to be hazardous manage accordingly. they were unsure what the contents were. Make a hazardous waste Observed 1 x 55 gallon drum in the waste storage room. Per facility,Violation Notes: generator knowledge or applying testing method. Failure to determine if wastes generated are hazardous waste by usingViolation Description: 12, Section(s) 66262.11 22 CCR 12 66262.11 - California Code of Regulations, Title 22, ChapterCitation: 09-08-2017Violation Date: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COSite Name: 120218Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: accumulation start date of 10/28/15. Observed 1 x 15 gallon container of waste brake fluid with anViolation Notes: and distance transported), whichever comes first. and at a 90/180/270 accumulation area (depending on size of generator i.e., the combined accumulation time at a satellite accumulation point accumulated onsite in any generator accumulation area is one year, process may be accumulated Total time hazardous waste can be area 55 gallons (or one quart of acute hazardous waste) of waste per reaching the 55 gallon (or one quart) limit to a 90 day accumulation accumulation limit is reached and moved within three days after GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (Continued) U001600994 TC5374254.2s Page 11 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation EHS ManagerEntity Title: Anthony DeSantoEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: 10931 N DE ANZA BLAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (330) 796-2490Affiliation Phone: 44316Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: OHAffiliation State: AkronAffiliation City: 200 Innovation Way, Dept 704Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Anthony DeSantoEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Chris WileyEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: CERSEval Source: HWEval Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEval Division: violations were [Truncated] records were reviewed EPA ID# CAL000013487 is active The following Portal Facility’s Emergency plan is available online via CERS Disposal Employee training plan and records are available in Goodyear’s Online and managed as scrap metal Container areas are inspected weekly UniFirst Batteries are managed by NAPA Brake shavings are collected maintenance Spill control is available on site Rags are manages my brake fluid (point of generation) Fire extinguishers have had annual absorbent 3 x 15 gallon used oil rollers 1 x 15 gallon drum of waste GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (Continued) U001600994 TC5374254.2s Page 12 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (408) 903-6256Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Service ManagerEntity Title: Albert EspinozaEntity Name: Secondary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 963-9725Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Store ManagerEntity Title: Jim WalkerEntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: The Goodyear Tire and Rubber CompanyEntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-2166Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COEntity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (330) 796-7202Affiliation Phone: 44316Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: OHAffiliation State: AkronAffiliation City: 200 Innovation WayAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COEntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (Continued)U001600994 TC5374254.2s Page 13 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation inner liner back to the supplier for the purpose of being refilled. (e)(2) or (e)(3) of this section; or (i) By shipping the container or to managing the container or inner liner pursuant to subsections or to another intermediate collection location for accumulation prior liner; or (4) By shipping the container or inner liner to a supplier person who reconditions or remanufactures the container or inner for subsequent reuse, or shipping the container or inner liner to a reconditioning or remanufacturing the container or inner liner onsite liner to a person who reclaims its scrap value; or (3) By reclaiming its scrap value onsite or shipping the container or inner CCR 11 66261.7 including but not limited to the following: (e)(2)By that previously held a hazardous material/waste in accordance with 22 Failure to manage empty containers greater than 5 gallons in capacityViolation Description: 11, Section(s) 66261.7 22 CCR 11 66261.7 - California Code of Regulations, Title 22, ChapterCitation: 09-08-2017Violation Date: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COSite Name: 120218Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: dated 7/14/17. records for waste coolant were unavailable for review except for one Per facility waste coolant is disposed of once a month. DisposalViolation Notes: General Hazardous Waste Generator Program - Administration/Documentation -Violation Description: 6.5, Section(s) Multiple Sections HSC 6.5 Multiple Sections - California Health and Safety Code, ChapterCitation: 09-08-2017Violation Date: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COSite Name: 120218Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: gallon used oil tank. Per facility, a tank assessment has not been performed for the 1 x 220Violation Notes: controls (if applicable) are suitably designed to meet the regulation. the foundation, structural support, seams, connections, and pressure hazardous waste, and that the tanks and containment system including integrity, is acceptable for the transferring, storing and treating of that, the new hazardous waste tank system has sufficient structural placing the tank system in service. The written assessment shall state certified by an independent, qualified, professional engineer prior to Failure to obtain and maintain a written assessment reviewed andViolation Description: Chapter 15, Section(s) 66265.192(a) 22 CCR 15 66265.192(a) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 09-08-2017Violation Date: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COSite Name: 120218Site ID: Violations: Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description: 10344415CERS ID: 120218Site ID: CERS TANKS: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (Continued) U001600994 TC5374254.2s Page 14 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation containment areas. Per facility, the absorbent has been accumulating containment and free flowing amounts of used oil in the secondary Observed saturated absorbent on the floor surrounding the secondaryViolation Notes: the environment. to air, soil, or surface water which could threaten human health or non-sudden release of hazardous waste or hazardous waste constituents possibility of a fire, explosion, or any unplanned sudden or Failure to maintain and operate the facility to minimize theViolation Description: 1, Section(s) 265.31 40 CFR 1 265.31 - U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, ChapterCitation: 09-08-2017Violation Date: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COSite Name: 120218Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: inspections are not being conducted. attached to 1 x 220 gallon used oil tank. Per facility daily Observed incomplete entries in the daily tank log inspection bookViolation Notes: the facility. systems each operating day and retain records of those inspections at Failure to conduct and document inspections of hazardous waste tankViolation Description: Chapter 15, Section(s) 66265.195(c) 22 CCR 15 66265.195(c) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 09-08-2017Violation Date: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COSite Name: 120218Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: waste coolant markings: 3 x 15 gallon used oil rollers 1 x 120 gallon container of The following containers were missing complete hazardous wasteViolation Notes: date. characteristics of the Hazardous Waste, and starting accumulation name and address of the generator, physical and chemical portable tanks with the following requirements: "Hazardous Waste", Failure to properly label hazardous waste accumulation containers andViolation Description: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.34(f) 22 CCR 12 66262.34(f) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 09-08-2017Violation Date: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COSite Name: 120218Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: material before disposal. 5 gallons are completely empty of free flowing liquids and scrap able pourable amounts of product present. Ensure that all containers under Observed 1 x quart bottle of injection fluid in the trash withViolation Notes: shall be managed within one year of being emptied. of this section shall be marked with the date it has been emptied and five gallons in capacity which is managed pursuant to subsection (e) (f) A container or an inner liner removed from a container larger than GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (Continued) U001600994 TC5374254.2s Page 15 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2067Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 02-09-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: determination and if determined to be hazardous manage accordingly. they were unsure what the contents were. Make a hazardous waste Observed 1 x 55 gallon drum in the waste storage room. Per facility,Violation Notes: generator knowledge or applying testing method. Failure to determine if wastes generated are hazardous waste by usingViolation Description: 12, Section(s) 66262.11 22 CCR 12 66262.11 - California Code of Regulations, Title 22, ChapterCitation: 09-08-2017Violation Date: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COSite Name: 120218Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: accumulation start date of 10/28/15. Observed 1 x 15 gallon container of waste brake fluid with anViolation Notes: and distance transported), whichever comes first. and at a 90/180/270 accumulation area (depending on size of generator i.e., the combined accumulation time at a satellite accumulation point accumulated onsite in any generator accumulation area is one year, process may be accumulated Total time hazardous waste can be area 55 gallons (or one quart of acute hazardous waste) of waste per reaching the 55 gallon (or one quart) limit to a 90 day accumulation accumulation limit is reached and moved within three days after information container must be labelled with the date the satellite labelled with the words Hazardous Waste including specified date that hazardous waste is first placed in the container and the operator the container must be clearly marked with the initial near the initial point of accumulation which was under the control of gallons of hazardous waste or one quart of acute hazardous waste at or including but not limited to the following: accumulate up to 55 Failed to meet the conditions of satellite accumulation regulations,Violation Description: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.34(e) 22 CCR 12 66262.34(e) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 09-08-2017Violation Date: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COSite Name: 120218Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: environment. liquids to minimize the event of an unplanned release into the areas are clean and free of saturated absorbent and free flowing there "for years" Ensure that secondary containment and surrounding GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (Continued) U001600994 TC5374254.2s Page 16 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Anthony DeSantoEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Chris WileyEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: CERSEval Source: HWEval Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEval Division: violations were [Truncated] records were reviewed EPA ID# CAL000013487 is active The following Portal Facility’s Emergency plan is available online via CERS Disposal Employee training plan and records are available in Goodyear’s Online and managed as scrap metal Container areas are inspected weekly UniFirst Batteries are managed by NAPA Brake shavings are collected maintenance Spill control is available on site Rags are manages my brake fluid (point of generation) Fire extinguishers have had annual absorbent 3 x 15 gallon used oil rollers 1 x 15 gallon drum of waste gallon drum of oily debris (paper filters) 1 x 55 gallon drum of waste waste coolant 3 x 55 gallon drums of drained used oil filters 1 x 55 site: 1 x 220 gallon tank of used oil 1 x 120 gallon container of accumulation areas and dumpsters Observed the following wastes on inspected include service bays, back storage room, hazardous waste On site to conduct a routine hazardous waste inspection AreasEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: YesViolations Found: 09-08-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Ocupancy ID: 2067Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-27-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (Continued) U001600994 TC5374254.2s Page 17 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: The Goodyear Tire and Rubber CompanyEntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-2166Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COEntity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (330) 796-7202Affiliation Phone: 44316Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: OHAffiliation State: AkronAffiliation City: 200 Innovation WayAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COEntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: EHS ManagerEntity Title: Anthony DeSantoEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: 10931 N DE ANZA BLAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (330) 796-2490Affiliation Phone: 44316Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: OHAffiliation State: AkronAffiliation City: 200 Innovation Way, Dept 704Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (Continued)U001600994 TC5374254.2s Page 18 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (408) 903-6256Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Service ManagerEntity Title: Albert EspinozaEntity Name: Secondary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 963-9725Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Store ManagerEntity Title: Jim WalkerEntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (Continued) U001600994 UTD981552177TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: AKRON, OH 443161000Mailing City,St,Zip: 200 INNOVATION WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 3307962490Telephone: ANTHONY J DESANTOContact: CAL000013487GEPAID: 2015Year: S113026237envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryMethod Decode: Unspecified oil-containing wasteCat Decode: 0.075Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Unspecified oil-containing wasteWaste Category: Santa ClaraTSD County: CAD059494310TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: AKRON, OH 443161000Mailing City,St,Zip: 200 INNOVATION WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 3307962490Telephone: ANTHONY J DESANTOContact: CAL000013487GEPAID: 2016Year: S113026237envid: HAZNET: Site 2 of 4 in cluster A Actual: 213 ft. Property CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Target 10931 N DE ANZA BLVD N/A A2 HAZNETGOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER #8773 S113026237 TC5374254.2s Page 19 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedTSD County: CA0000084517TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: AKRON, OH 443161000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1144 E MARKET STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 3307966240Telephone: DARRYL L MOYER/RETAIL SYSTEMSContact: CAL000013487GEPAID: 2004Year: S113026237envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.2Tons: Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToDisposal Method: Other organic solidsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: NVT330010000TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: AKRON, OH 443161000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1144 E MARKET STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 3307966240Telephone: DARRYL L MOYER/RETAIL SYSTEMSContact: CAL000013487GEPAID: 2007Year: S113026237envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.2Tons: Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToDisposal Method: Other organic solidsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: NVT330010000TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: AKRON, OH 443161000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1144 E MARKET STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 3307966240Telephone: DARRYL L MOYER/RETAIL SYSTEMSContact: CAL000013487GEPAID: 2007Year: S113026237envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.03Tons: Incineration--Thermal Destruction Other Than Use As A FuelDisposal Method: Unspecified organic liquid mixtureWaste Category: 99TSD County: GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER #8773 (Continued)S113026237 TC5374254.2s Page 20 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 35 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.89Tons: Not reportedDisposal Method: Unspecified organic liquid mixtureWaste Category: GOODYEAR AUTO SERVICE CENTER #8773 (Continued) S113026237 additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER Environmental Interest/Information System 110066423524Registry ID: FINDS: Site 3 of 4 in cluster A Actual: 213 ft. Property CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Target 10931 N DE ANZA BL N/A A3 FINDSGOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 1023346374 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: Regional Water BoardContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608500867Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: All Files are on GeoTracker or in the Local Agency DatabaseFile Location: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: Not reportedRB Case Number: USTCase Worker: 02/19/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -122.031648159027Longitude: 37.3371522289046Latitude: T0608500867Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0608500867Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPLead Agency: LUST: 122 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster A 0.023 mi.CERS Relative: Lower Actual: 211 ft. < 1/8 HIST CORTESECUPERTINO, CA 95014 East HIST LUST10930 DE ANZA BLVD N/A A4 LUSTMARIANI PACKING S102432979 TC5374254.2s Page 21 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 02/19/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608500867Global Id: 09/17/1984Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608500867Global Id: 07/20/1984Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608500867Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 07/20/1984Date: OtherAction Type: T0608500867Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #39492Action: 04/29/1988Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500867Global Id: ExcavationAction: 07/20/1984Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608500867Global Id: Not reportedAction: 07/20/1984Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608500867Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 02/28/1984Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500867Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 02/19/1991Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500867Global Id: LUST: 4089183400Phone Number: Not reportedEmail: SAN JOSECity: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Address: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: UST CASE WORKERContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608500867Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: Not reportedEmail: OAKLANDCity: MARIANI PACKING (Continued)S102432979 TC5374254.2s Page 22 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Regional Water Board - SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: 4089183400Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN JOSEAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: UST CASE WORKER - SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPEntity Name: Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description: T0608500867CERS ID: 190865Site ID: CERS TANKS: 43-0856Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 43Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1991-02-19 00:00:00Closed Date: 1985-01-01 00:00:00Date Listed: SCVWDOversite Agency: 07S2W12G01SCVWD ID: 2Region Code: SANTA CLARARegion: HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: 07S2W12G01FEDR Link ID: 02/19/1991Date Closed: 07S2W12G01FSCVWD ID: SANTA CLARARegion: LUST SANTA CLARA: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: 9/17/1984Preliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Discovered: 07S2W12G01fCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: MARIANI PACKING (Continued)S102432979 TC5374254.2s Page 23 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: OAKLANDAffiliation City: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: MARIANI PACKING (Continued)S102432979 Notice of Responsibility - #39491Action: 10/31/1995Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500257Global Id: LUST: 4089183400Phone Number: Not reportedEmail: SAN JOSECity: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Address: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: UST CASE WORKERContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608500257Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: Not reportedEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: Regional Water BoardContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608500257Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: All Files are on GeoTracker or in the Local Agency DatabaseFile Location: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: Not reportedRB Case Number: USTCase Worker: 02/01/1999Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -122.031545Longitude: 37.312668Latitude: T0608500257Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0608500257Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPLead Agency: LUST: 187 ft. Site 1 of 7 in cluster B 0.035 mi.CERS Relative: Lower Actual: 209 ft. < 1/8 HIST CORTESECUPERTINO, CA 95014 NNE HIST LUST11025 DE ANZA BLVD N/A B5 LUSTMOBIL S104396926 TC5374254.2s Page 24 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2Region Code: SANTA CLARARegion: HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: 07S2W12F01FEDR Link ID: 02/01/1999Date Closed: 07S2W12F01FSCVWD ID: SANTA CLARARegion: LUST SANTA CLARA: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: 11/6/1985Preliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Discovered: 07S2W12F01fCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 02/01/1999Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608500257Global Id: 11/06/1985Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608500257Global Id: 11/06/1985Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608500257Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1986Date: OtherAction Type: T0608500257Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 02/01/1999Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500257Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 02/01/1999Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500257Global Id: MOBIL (Continued)S104396926 TC5374254.2s Page 25 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: OAKLANDAffiliation City: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Regional Water Board - SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: 4089183400Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN JOSEAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: UST CASE WORKER - SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPEntity Name: Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description: T0608500257CERS ID: 228995Site ID: CERS TANKS: 43-0193Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 43Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1999-02-01 00:00:00Closed Date: 1987-01-01 00:00:00Date Listed: SCVWDOversite Agency: 07S2W12F01SCVWD ID: MOBIL (Continued)S104396926 FA0200749Facility ID: PR0313937Record ID: -122.03251Longitude: 37.33788Latitude: GENERATES WASTE OIL ONLYProgram Description: 2201PE#: SANTA CLARARegion: CUPA SANTA CLARA: 227 ft. Site 2 of 7 in cluster B 0.043 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 209 ft. < 1/8 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 North 11025 N DE ANZA BL N/A B6 CUPA ListingsCARLOS’ AUTO REPAIR S121468447 TC5374254.2s Page 26 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: LEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10-11-89Active Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 43-000-000502-000003SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 10-11-89Created Date: 10-11-89Action Date: 10-11-89Referral Date: 44-000003Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 502Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10-11-89Active Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 43-000-000502-000002SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 10-11-89Created Date: 10-11-89Action Date: 10-11-89Referral Date: 44-000003Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 502Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 4Number Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WSTG: OILTank Use: 10-11-89Active Date: 1000Capacity: ATank Status: 43-000-000502-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 10-11-89Created Date: 10-11-89Action Date: 10-11-89Referral Date: 44-000003Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 502Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: CERS HAZ WASTE 227 ft.CERSSite 3 of 7 in cluster B 0.043 mi.CERS TANKS Relative: Lower Actual: 209 ft. < 1/8 CUPA ListingsCUPERTINO, CA 95014 North CA FID UST11025 N DE ANZA BL N/A B7 SWEEPS USTDE ANZA AUTO REPAIR S101630427 TC5374254.2s Page 27 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SANTA CLARARegion: CUPA SANTA CLARA: InactiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: CUPERTINO 95014Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 11025 N DE ANZA BLVDMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 4082453732Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 00039585Regulated ID: UTNKIRegulated By: 43000407Facility ID: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: CUPERTINO 95014Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 2868 PROSPECT DRMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: Not reportedFacility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 43000407Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10-11-89Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 43-000-000502-000004SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 10-11-89Created Date: 10-11-89Action Date: 10-11-89Referral Date: 44-000003Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 502Comp Number: ActiveStatus: DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR (Continued)S101630427 TC5374254.2s Page 28 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-12-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-11-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-11-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 02-19-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 02-19-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: Underground Storage TankCERS Description: 10344490CERS ID: 110582Site ID: CERS TANKS: FA0268076Facility ID: PR0395605Record ID: -122.03245Longitude: 37.33566Latitude: GENERATES 100 KG YR TO <5 TONS/YRProgram Description: 2205PE#: DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR (Continued) S101630427 TC5374254.2s Page 29 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: 11025 N. DE ANZA BLAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: DE ANZA AUTO REPAIREntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: 11025 N. DE ANZA BLAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 505-8039Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 11025 N De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mohammed Al-AzzawyEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-13-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-12-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR (Continued)S101630427 TC5374254.2s Page 30 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CupertinoAffiliation City: 11025 De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Nick GeraEntity Name: UST Tank OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 245-3732Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 11025 N De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mohammed AlazzawyEntity Name: UST Tank OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 391-9081Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 11025 N De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Nick GeraEntity Name: UST Property Owner NameAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 597-6111Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: ManagerEntity Title: Rod MartinEntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: DE ANZA AUTO REPAIREntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 245-3732Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mohammed Al-AzzawyEntity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 245-3732Affiliation Phone: DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR (Continued)S101630427 TC5374254.2s Page 31 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-12-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-11-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-11-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 02-19-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 02-19-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description: 10344490CERS ID: 110582Site ID: CERS TANKS: (408) 391-9081Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR (Continued) S101630427 TC5374254.2s Page 32 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: 11025 N. DE ANZA BLAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: DE ANZA AUTO REPAIREntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: 11025 N. DE ANZA BLAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 505-8039Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 11025 N De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mohammed Al-AzzawyEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-13-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-12-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR (Continued)S101630427 TC5374254.2s Page 33 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CupertinoAffiliation City: 11025 De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Nick GeraEntity Name: UST Tank OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 245-3732Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 11025 N De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mohammed AlazzawyEntity Name: UST Tank OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 391-9081Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 11025 N De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Nick GeraEntity Name: UST Property Owner NameAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 597-6111Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: ManagerEntity Title: Rod MartinEntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: DE ANZA AUTO REPAIREntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 245-3732Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mohammed Al-AzzawyEntity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 245-3732Affiliation Phone: DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR (Continued)S101630427 TC5374254.2s Page 34 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-12-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-11-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-11-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 02-19-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 02-19-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: Hazardous Waste GeneratorCERS Description: 10344490CERS ID: 110582Site ID: CERS HAZ WASTE: (408) 391-9081Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR (Continued) S101630427 TC5374254.2s Page 35 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: 11025 N. DE ANZA BLAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: DE ANZA AUTO REPAIREntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: 11025 N. DE ANZA BLAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 505-8039Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 11025 N De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mohammed Al-AzzawyEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-13-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2097Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-12-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR (Continued)S101630427 TC5374254.2s Page 36 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CupertinoAffiliation City: 11025 De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Nick GeraEntity Name: UST Tank OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 245-3732Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 11025 N De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mohammed AlazzawyEntity Name: UST Tank OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 391-9081Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 11025 N De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Nick GeraEntity Name: UST Property Owner NameAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 597-6111Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: ManagerEntity Title: Rod MartinEntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: DE ANZA AUTO REPAIREntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 245-3732Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mohammed Al-AzzawyEntity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 245-3732Affiliation Phone: DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR (Continued)S101630427 TC5374254.2s Page 37 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (408) 391-9081Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: DE ANZA AUTO REPAIR (Continued) S101630427 FA0260942Facility ID: PR0382551Record ID: -122.03251Longitude: 37.33788Latitude: GENERATES 100 KG YR TO <5 TONS/YRProgram Description: 2205PE#: SANTA CLARARegion: CUPA SANTA CLARA: 227 ft. Site 4 of 7 in cluster B 0.043 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 209 ft. < 1/8 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 North 11025 N DE ANZA BL N/A B8 CUPA ListingsCUPERTINO AUTO SERVICE S121473873 -122.03246Longitude: 37.33783Latitude: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthPermitting Agency: Not reportedFacility ID: -122.03215Longitude: 37.33656Latitude: CAMPBELL,CUPERTINO,LOS GATOS,MORGAN HILLPermitting Agency: 34Facility ID: UST: 227 ft. Site 5 of 7 in cluster B 0.043 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 209 ft. < 1/8 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 North 11025 N DE ANZA BL N/A B9 USTDE ANZA AUTO REPAIR U003804535 Gasoline Service Stations1986 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations1986 CORONA MOBIL SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations1985 CORONA MOBIL SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations1983 CORONA MOBIL SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations1982 CORONA MOBIL SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations1980 CORONA MOBIL SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations1979 CORONA MOBIL SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations1978 CORONA MOBIL SERVICE Type:Year: Name: EDR Hist Auto 227 ft. Site 6 of 7 in cluster B 0.043 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 209 ft. < 1/8 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 North 11025 N DE ANZA BLVD N/A B10 EDR Hist AutoCARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED 1020824730 TC5374254.2s Page 38 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Gasoline Service Stations2005 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations2004 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations2003 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations2002 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations2001 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations2000 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations1999 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations1998 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations1997 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations1996 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations1995 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations1994 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations1993 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations1992 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations1991 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations1990 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations1989 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations1988 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED Gasoline Service Stations1988 CORONA MOBIL SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations1987 CORONA MOBIL SERVICE Gasoline Service Stations1987 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED (Continued) 1020824730 Not reportedActive Date: 6000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 43-012-039585-000002SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000400Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 39585Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: 4Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 6000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 43-012-039585-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000400Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 39585Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: 227 ft. Site 7 of 7 in cluster B 0.043 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 209 ft. < 1/8 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 North HIST UST11025 N DE ANZA BLVD N/A B11 SWEEPS USTMOBIL SERVICE STATION U001601006 TC5374254.2s Page 39 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 00006000Tank Capacity: 1960Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0004Total Tanks: LOS ANGELES, CA 90017Owner City,St,Zip: 612 SO. FLOWER STREETOwner Address: MOBIL OIL CORPORATIONOwner Name: 4082453732Telephone: CARLOS M. CORONAContact Name: MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL SOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000039585Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WASTESTG: OILTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 285Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 43-012-039585-000004SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000400Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 39585Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 5000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 43-012-039585-000003SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000400Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 39585Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: LEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: MOBIL SERVICE STATION (Continued)U001601006 TC5374254.2s Page 40 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation VisualLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000285Tank Capacity: 1960Year Installed: 4Container Num: 004Tank Num: Visual, Stock Inventor, Pressure TestLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: 06Type of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00005000Tank Capacity: 1960Year Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: Visual, Stock Inventor, Pressure TestLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00006000Tank Capacity: 1960Year Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Visual, Stock Inventor, Pressure TestLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: MOBIL SERVICE STATION (Continued) U001601006 month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time; Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendarDescription: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: EHS@RITEAID.COMContact email: (717) 975-8643Contact telephone: USContact country: CAMP HILL, PA 17011 HUNTER LNContact address: DAVID W CROZIERContact: CAMP HILL, PA 17011 HUNTER LNMailing address: CAR000251223EPA ID: CUPERTINO, CA 950140432 20572 HOMESTEAD RDFacility address: RITE AID NO 5967Facility name: 04/14/2017Date form received by agency: RCRA-CESQG: 352 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster C 0.067 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 212 ft. < 1/8 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 NW 20572 HOMESTEAD RD CAR000251223 C12 RCRA-CESQGRITE AID NO 5967 1016955330 TC5374254.2s Page 41 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOwner/operator email: (408) 446-0700Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 N DEANZA BLVD #200Owner/operator address: SOBRATO INTERESTS 1 & SOBRATOOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 09/06/2012Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: THRIFTY PAYLESS INCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 09/06/2012Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: THRIFTY PAYLESS INCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 09/06/2012Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 408-446-0700Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 10600 N DEANZA BLVD NO 200Owner/operator address: SOBRATO INTERESTS 1 AND 2Owner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or RITE AID NO 5967 (Continued)1016955330 TC5374254.2s Page 42 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 352. Waste code: Unspecified organic liquid mixture. Waste name: 343. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus organics. Waste name: 331. Waste code: Pharmaceutical waste. Waste name: 311. Waste code: Latex waste. Waste name: 291. Waste code: Polychlorinated biphenyls and material containing PCB’s. Waste name: 261. Waste code: Unspecified oil-containing waste. Waste name: 223. Waste code: Unspecified solvent mixture. Waste name: 214. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus inorganics. Waste name: 141. Waste code: perchlorate, and sulfide anions) bromate, chlorate, cyanide, fluoride, hypochlorite, nitrite, Aqueous solution (2 < pH < 12.5) containing reactive anions (azide,. Waste name: 131. Waste code: Alkaline solution without metals (pH > 12.5). Waste name: 122. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 09/06/2012Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: RITE AID NO 5967 (Continued)1016955330 TC5374254.2s Page 43 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NAPHTHALENE. Waste name: U165. Waste code: NICOTINE, & SALTS. Waste name: P075. Waste code: WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% 2H-1-BENZOPYRAN-2-ONE, 4-HYDROXY-3-(3-OXO-1-PHENYLBUTYL)-, & SALTS,. Waste name: P001. Waste code: CRESOL. Waste name: D026. Waste code: M-CRESOL. Waste name: D024. Waste code: SILVER. Waste name: D011. Waste code: SELENIUM. Waste name: D010. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Liquids with pH < 2. Waste name: 791. Waste code: Detergent and soap. Waste name: 561. Waste code: Photochemicals / photo processing waste. Waste name: 541. Waste code: Other organic solids. Waste name: RITE AID NO 5967 (Continued)1016955330 TC5374254.2s Page 44 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SELENIUM. Waste name: D010. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Liquids with pH < 2. Waste name: 791. Waste code: Pharmaceutical waste. Waste name: 311. Waste code: Pesticides and other waste associated with pesticide production. Waste name: 232. Waste code: Unspecified solvent mixture. Waste name: 214. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus inorganics. Waste name: 141. Waste code: perchlorate, and sulfide anions) bromate, chlorate, cyanide, fluoride, hypochlorite, nitrite, Aqueous solution (2 < pH < 12.5) containing reactive anions (azide,. Waste name: 131. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: RITE AID NO 5967Site name: 12/10/2014Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: CARBARYL (OR) 1-NAPHTHALENOL, METHYLCARBAMATE. Waste name: U279. Waste code: PHENOL. Waste name: U188. Waste code: RITE AID NO 5967 (Continued)1016955330 TC5374254.2s Page 45 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: NICOTINE, & SALTS. Waste name: P075. Waste code: WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% 2H-1-BENZOPYRAN-2-ONE, 4-HYDROXY-3-(3-OXO-1-PHENYLBUTYL)-, & SALTS,. Waste name: P001. Waste code: CRESOL. Waste name: D026. Waste code: M-CRESOL. Waste name: D024. Waste code: SILVER. Waste name: D011. Waste code: RITE AID NO 5967 (Continued)1016955330 DAVID CROZIERContact: CAR000251223GEPAID: 2016Year: S111459879envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryMethod Decode: Unspecified organic liquid mixtureCat Decode: 0.008Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Unspecified organic liquid mixtureWaste Category: 99TSD County: NVD980895338TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: CAMP HILL, PA 17011Mailing City,St,Zip: 30 HUNTER LNMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7179758643Telephone: DAVID CROZIERContact: CAR000251223GEPAID: 2016Year: S111459879envid: HAZNET: FA0272147Facility ID: PR0411590Record ID: -122.03826Longitude: 37.33753Latitude: GENERATES 100 KG YR TO <5 TONS/YRProgram Description: 2205PE#: SANTA CLARARegion: CUPA SANTA CLARA: 352 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster C 0.067 mi.CIWQS Relative: Lower Actual: 212 ft. < 1/8 CERS HAZ WASTECUPERTINO, CA 95014 NW HAZNET20572 HOMESTEAD ROAD N/A C13 CUPA ListingsRITE AID STORE NO 5967 S111459879 TC5374254.2s Page 46 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 7179758643Telephone: DAVID CROZIERContact: CAR000251223GEPAID: 2016Year: S111459879envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Alkaline solution without metals pH >= 12.5Cat Decode: 0.004Tons: Not reportedDisposal Method: Alkaline solution without metals pH >= 12.5Waste Category: SacramentoTSD County: CAD980884183TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: CAMP HILL, PA 17011Mailing City,St,Zip: 30 HUNTER LNMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7179758643Telephone: DAVID CROZIERContact: CAR000251223GEPAID: 2016Year: S111459879envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Unspecified solvent mixtureCat Decode: 0.009Tons: Not reportedDisposal Method: Unspecified solvent mixtureWaste Category: SacramentoTSD County: CAD980884183TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: CAMP HILL, PA 17011Mailing City,St,Zip: 30 HUNTER LNMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7179758643Telephone: DAVID CROZIERContact: CAR000251223GEPAID: 2016Year: S111459879envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryMethod Decode: Off-specification, aged or surplus organicsCat Decode: 0.0445Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Off-specification, aged or surplus organicsWaste Category: SacramentoTSD County: CAD980884183TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: CAMP HILL, PA 17011Mailing City,St,Zip: 30 HUNTER LNMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7179758643Telephone: RITE AID STORE NO 5967 (Continued)S111459879 TC5374254.2s Page 47 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: -122.033200Longitude: 37.337500Latitude: Center of a facility or station.Ref Point Type Desc: Not reportedCoord Name: 10423549Program ID: HWGEnv Int Type Code: Rite Aid #5967Facility Name: 148161Site ID: Coordinates: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Ocupancy ID: 16376Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-21-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 16376Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-18-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: Hazardous Waste GeneratorCERS Description: 10423549CERS ID: 148161Site ID: CERS HAZ WASTE: 24 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access Santa ClaraFacility County: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryMethod Decode: Pharmaceutical wasteCat Decode: 0.0015Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Pharmaceutical wasteWaste Category: SacramentoTSD County: CAD980884183TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: CAMP HILL, PA 17011Mailing City,St,Zip: 30 HUNTER LNMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: RITE AID STORE NO 5967 (Continued) S111459879 TC5374254.2s Page 48 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (717) 761-2633Affiliation Phone: 17011Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: PAAffiliation State: Camp HillAffiliation City: 30 Hunter LaneAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Thrifty Payless, IncEntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Manager, EHSEntity Title: David CrozierEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 17011Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: PAAffiliation State: Camp HillAffiliation City: 30 Hunter Lane, Attn EHSAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (717) 975-8643Affiliation Phone: 17011Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: PAAffiliation State: Camp HillAffiliation City: 30 Hunter LaneAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: David CrozierEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Jordan AndersonEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: RITE AID STORE NO 5967 (Continued)S111459879 TC5374254.2s Page 49 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 03-18-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: RCRA LQ HW GeneratorCERS Description: 10423549CERS ID: 148161Site ID: (650) 804-3264Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Pharmacy District ManagerEntity Title: Sageda ThirucoteEntity Name: Secondary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 446-0700Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 10600 N. DeAnza Blvd., #200Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: The Sobrato OrganizationEntity Name: Property OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (917) 698-1764Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: District ManagerEntity Title: Tierre ChappelEntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: RITE AID CORPORATIONEntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 253-2005Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Rite Aid #5967Entity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: RITE AID STORE NO 5967 (Continued)S111459879 TC5374254.2s Page 50 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (717) 975-8643Affiliation Phone: 17011Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: PAAffiliation State: Camp HillAffiliation City: 30 Hunter LaneAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: David CrozierEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Jordan AndersonEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: -122.033200Longitude: 37.337500Latitude: Center of a facility or station.Ref Point Type Desc: Not reportedCoord Name: 10423549Program ID: HWGEnv Int Type Code: Rite Aid #5967Facility Name: 148161Site ID: Coordinates: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Ocupancy ID: 16376Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-21-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 16376Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: RITE AID STORE NO 5967 (Continued) S111459879 TC5374254.2s Page 51 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: District ManagerEntity Title: Tierre ChappelEntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: RITE AID CORPORATIONEntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 253-2005Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Rite Aid #5967Entity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (717) 761-2633Affiliation Phone: 17011Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: PAAffiliation State: Camp HillAffiliation City: 30 Hunter LaneAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Thrifty Payless, IncEntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Manager, EHSEntity Title: David CrozierEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 17011Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: PAAffiliation State: Camp HillAffiliation City: 30 Hunter Lane, Attn EHSAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: RITE AID STORE NO 5967 (Continued)S111459879 TC5374254.2s Page 52 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -122.0333Longitude: 37.33707Latitude: 0Violations within 5 years: 0Enforcement Actions within 5 years: Not reportedTTWQ: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedMajor/Minor: Not reportedDesign Flow: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: 09/28/2012Termination Date: 11/23/2011Effective Date: Not reportedAdoption Date: CAS000002NPDES Number: 2 43C362489WDID: 2009-0009-DWQOrder Number: Storm water constructionRegulatory Measure Type: TerminatedRegulatory Measure Status: CONSTWProgram: 2Region: Not reportedSIC/NAICS: Construction - CommercialPlace/Project Type: 10600 North De Anza Boulevard Suite 200, Cupertino, CA 95014Agency Address: The Sobrato OrganizationAgency: CIWQS: (650) 804-3264Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Pharmacy District ManagerEntity Title: Sageda ThirucoteEntity Name: Secondary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 446-0700Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 10600 N. DeAnza Blvd., #200Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: The Sobrato OrganizationEntity Name: Property OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (917) 698-1764Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: RITE AID STORE NO 5967 (Continued) S111459879 TC5374254.2s Page 53 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 20580 HomesteadAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (630) 296-1552Affiliation Phone: 60440Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: ILAffiliation State: BolingbrookAffiliation City: 1000 Remington Boulevard, Suite 120Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Jeremy HojnickiEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Danielle DeliseEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: -122.033170Longitude: 37.337381Latitude: Entrance point of a facility or stationRef Point Type Desc: Not reportedCoord Name: 10643665Program ID: HWGEnv Int Type Code: ULTA BEAUTYFacility Name: 409178Site ID: Coordinates: Hazardous Waste GeneratorCERS Description: 10643665CERS ID: 409178Site ID: CERS HAZ WASTE: 442 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster C 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 213 ft. < 1/8 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 NW CERS20580 HOMESTEAD RD N/A C14 CERS HAZ WASTEULTA BEAUTY S121777996 TC5374254.2s Page 54 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Address: Emergency ResponseEntity Title: 3EEntity Name: Secondary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (708) 275-6603Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Compliance ManagerEntity Title: Jeremy HojnickiEntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: ULTA BeautyEntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (630) 410-4800Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: ULTA BeautyEntity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (630) 410-4800Affiliation Phone: 60440Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: ILAffiliation State: BolingbrookAffiliation City: 1000 Remington Boulevard, Suite 120Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: ULTA BeautyEntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Compliance SpecialistEntity Title: Danielle DeliseEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: ULTA BEAUTY (Continued)S121777996 TC5374254.2s Page 55 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 20580 HomesteadAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (630) 296-1552Affiliation Phone: 60440Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: ILAffiliation State: BolingbrookAffiliation City: 1000 Remington Boulevard, Suite 120Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Jeremy HojnickiEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Danielle DeliseEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: -122.033170Longitude: 37.337381Latitude: Entrance point of a facility or stationRef Point Type Desc: Not reportedCoord Name: 10643665Program ID: HWGEnv Int Type Code: ULTA BEAUTYFacility Name: 409178Site ID: Coordinates: Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description: 10643665CERS ID: 409178Site ID: CERS TANKS: (800) 451-8346Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: ULTA BEAUTY (Continued)S121777996 TC5374254.2s Page 56 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Secondary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (708) 275-6603Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Compliance ManagerEntity Title: Jeremy HojnickiEntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: ULTA BeautyEntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (630) 410-4800Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: ULTA BeautyEntity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (630) 410-4800Affiliation Phone: 60440Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: ILAffiliation State: BolingbrookAffiliation City: 1000 Remington Boulevard, Suite 120Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: ULTA BeautyEntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Compliance SpecialistEntity Title: Danielle DeliseEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: ULTA BEAUTY (Continued)S121777996 TC5374254.2s Page 57 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (800) 451-8346Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Emergency ResponseEntity Title: 3EEntity Name: ULTA BEAUTY (Continued)S121777996 PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 717-730-8225Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: CAMP HILL, PA 17011 30 HUNTER LNOwner/operator address: RITE AID CORPOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time; Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendarDescription: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: SSCAIATI@RITEAID.COMContact email: 717-730-8225Contact telephone: USContact country: CAMP HILL, PA 17011 30 HUNTER LNContact address: STEPHANIE CAIATIContact: CAMP HILL, PA 17011 30 HUNTER LNMailing address: CA0001010024EPA ID: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 20580 HOMESTEAD AVEFacility address: RITE AID 5967Facility name: 08/30/2010Date form received by agency: RCRA-CESQG: 442 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster C 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 213 ft. < 1/8 ECHOCUPERTINO, CA 95014 NW FINDS20580 HOMESTEAD AVE CA0001010024 C15 RCRA-CESQGRITE AID NO 5967 1000978390 TC5374254.2s Page 58 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: BARIUM. Waste name: D005. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 09/01/1962Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 717-730-8225Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: CAMP HILL, PA 17011 30 HUNTER LNOwner/operator address: RITE AID CORPOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 09/01/1962Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: RITE AID NO 5967 (Continued)1000978390 TC5374254.2s Page 59 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002623475DFR URL: 110002623475Registry ID: 1000978390Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110002623475Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: RITE AID NO 5967Site name: 07/25/1997Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: 2-BUTANONE, PEROXIDE (R,T). Waste name: U160. Waste code: METHANE, DICHLORO-. Waste name: U080. Waste code: ACETONE (I). Waste name: U002. Waste code: METHYL ETHYL KETONE. Waste name: D035. Waste code: 2,4-D. Waste name: D016. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: RITE AID NO 5967 (Continued)1000978390 TC5374254.2s Page 60 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 6302961552Telephone: JEREMY HOJNICKIContact: CAL000402477GEPAID: 2016Year: S112836265envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Off-specification, aged or surplus organicsCat Decode: 0.0825Tons: Not reportedDisposal Method: Off-specification, aged or surplus organicsWaste Category: SacramentoTSD County: CAD980884183TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: BOLINGBROOK, IL 60440Mailing City,St,Zip: 1000 REMINGTON BLVD, SUITE 120Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 6302961552Telephone: JEREMY HOJNICKIContact: CAL000402477GEPAID: 2016Year: S112836265envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryMethod Decode: Off-specification, aged or surplus organicsCat Decode: 0.532Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Off-specification, aged or surplus organicsWaste Category: 99TSD County: NVD980895338TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: BOLINGBROOK, IL 60440Mailing City,St,Zip: 1000 REMINGTON BLVD, SUITE 120Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 6302961552Telephone: JEREMY HOJNICKIContact: CAL000402477GEPAID: 2016Year: S112836265envid: HAZNET: FA0200885Facility ID: PR0317720Record ID: -122.03317Longitude: 37.33738Latitude: GENERATES 100 KG YR TO <5 TONS/YRProgram Description: 2205PE#: SANTA CLARARegion: CUPA SANTA CLARA: 442 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster C 0.084 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 213 ft. < 1/8 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 NW HAZNET20580 HOMESTEAD RD N/A C16 CUPA ListingsULTA BEAUTY #777 S112836265 TC5374254.2s Page 61 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Santa ClaraFacility County: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryMethod Decode: Other inorganic solid wasteCat Decode: 0.0025Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Other inorganic solid wasteWaste Category: SacramentoTSD County: CAD980884183TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: BOLINGBROOK, IL 60440Mailing City,St,Zip: 1000 REMINGTON BLVD, SUITE 120Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 6302961552Telephone: JEREMY HOJNICKIContact: CAL000402477GEPAID: 2016Year: S112836265envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryMethod Decode: Other inorganic solid wasteCat Decode: 0.0005Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Other inorganic solid wasteWaste Category: 99TSD County: NVD980895338TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: BOLINGBROOK, IL 60440Mailing City,St,Zip: 1000 REMINGTON BLVD, SUITE 120Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 6302961552Telephone: JEREMY HOJNICKIContact: CAL000402477GEPAID: 2016Year: S112836265envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryMethod Decode: Off-specification, aged or surplus organicsCat Decode: 0.785Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Off-specification, aged or surplus organicsWaste Category: SacramentoTSD County: CAD980884183TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: BOLINGBROOK, IL 60440Mailing City,St,Zip: 1000 REMINGTON BLVD, SUITE 120Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: ULTA BEAUTY #777 (Continued)S112836265 TC5374254.2s Page 62 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 62 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access ULTA BEAUTY #777 (Continued)S112836265 408-446-0700Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 N DE ANZA BLVD #200Owner/operator address: SOBRATO INTERESTSOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 05/01/2014Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: SAFEWAYOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: KEITH.POWERS@SAFEWAY.COMContact email: 510-246-0358Contact telephone: USContact country: PLEASANTON, CA 94588 STONERIDGE MALL RDContact address: KEITH POWERSContact: PLEASANTON, CA 94588 STONERIDGE MALL RDMailing address: CAR000258061EPA ID: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 20620 HOMESTEAD RDFacility address: SAFEWAY STORE #3251Facility name: 02/01/2016Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 491 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster D 0.093 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 216 ft. < 1/8 ECHOCUPERTINO, CA 95014 WNW FINDS20620 HOMESTEAD RD CAR000258061 D17 RCRA-LQGSAFEWAY STORE 3251 1018273648 TC5374254.2s Page 63 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Off-specification, aged, or surplus organics. Waste name: 331. Waste code: Pharmaceutical waste. Waste name: 311. Waste code: Unspecified solvent mixture. Waste name: 214. Waste code: Other inorganic solid waste. Waste name: 181. Waste code: Alkaline solution without metals (pH > 12.5). Waste name: 122. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 11/17/2010Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: SAFEWAY STORE 3251 (Continued) 1018273648 TC5374254.2s Page 64 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110065039185DFR URL: 110065039185Registry ID: 1018273648Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110065039185Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NICOTINE, & SALTS. Waste name: P075. Waste code: WHEN PRESENT AT CONCENTRATIONS GREATER THAN 0.3% 2H-1-BENZOPYRAN-2-ONE, 4-HYDROXY-3-(3-OXO-1-PHENYLBUTYL)-, & SALTS,. Waste name: P001. Waste code: METHYL ETHYL KETONE. Waste name: D035. Waste code: SAFEWAY STORE 3251 (Continued) 1018273648 Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: KEITH.POWERS@SAFEWAY.COMContact email: 510-246-0358Contact telephone: USContact country: PLEASANTON, CA 94588 STONERIDGE MALL RDContact address: KEITH B POWERSContact: PLEASANTON, CA 94588 STONERIDGE MALL RDMailing address: CAL000396291EPA ID: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 20620 HOMESTEAD RDFacility address: SAFEWAY STORE #3251Facility name: 06/09/2016Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 491 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster D 0.093 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 216 ft. < 1/8 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 WNW 20620 HOMESTEAD RD CAL000396291 D18 RCRA-LQGSAFEWAY STORE #3251 1019899429 TC5374254.2s Page 65 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 11/17/2010Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 408-446-0700Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 N DE ANZA BLVD #200Owner/operator address: SOBRATO INTERESTS 1Owner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 05/01/2014Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: SAFEWAYOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste SAFEWAY STORE #3251 (Continued) 1019899429 TC5374254.2s Page 66 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: 251Amount (Lbs): NICOTINE, & SALTSWaste name: P075Waste code: 251Amount (Lbs): DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 ISWaste name: D002Waste code: 251Amount (Lbs): WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: Annual Waste Handled: Last Biennial Reporting Year: 2017 Biennial Reports: NICOTINE, & SALTS. Waste name: P075. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: SAFEWAY STORE #3251 (Continued) 1019899429 TC5374254.2s Page 67 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0.001Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Pharmaceutical wasteWaste Category: SacramentoTSD County: CAD980884183TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: BOISE, ID 837060000Mailing City,St,Zip: 250 E PARKCENTER BLVDMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 2083956150Telephone: SHARON SANGERContact: CAL000396291GEPAID: 2016Year: S118585227envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.0005Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Not reportedWaste Category: 99TSD County: NVD980895338TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: BOISE, ID 837060000Mailing City,St,Zip: 250 E PARKCENTER BLVDMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 2083956150Telephone: SHARON SANGERContact: CAL000396291GEPAID: 2016Year: S118585227envid: HAZNET: FA0282291Facility ID: PR0423437Record ID: Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: HMBP FACILITY, 1-3 CHEMICALSProgram Description: Not reportedPE#: SANTA CLARARegion: FA0282291Facility ID: PR0423432Record ID: Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: GENERATES 100 KG YR TO <5 TONS/YRProgram Description: 2205PE#: SANTA CLARARegion: CUPA SANTA CLARA: 491 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster D 0.093 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 216 ft. < 1/8 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 WNW HAZNET20620 HOMESTEAD RD N/A D19 CUPA ListingsSAFEWAY STORE #3251 S118585227 TC5374254.2s Page 68 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Unspecified solvent mixtureWaste Category: 99TSD County: NVD980895338TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: PLEASANTON, CA 94588Mailing City,St,Zip: 5918 STONERIDGE MALL RDMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 5102460358Telephone: KEITH POWERSContact: CAR000258061GEPAID: 2016Year: S118585227envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: Neutralization OnlyMethod Decode: Alkaline solution without metals pH >= 12.5Cat Decode: 0.114Tons: Neutralization OnlyDisposal Method: Alkaline solution without metals pH >= 12.5Waste Category: 99TSD County: NVD980895338TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: PLEASANTON, CA 94588Mailing City,St,Zip: 5918 STONERIDGE MALL RDMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 5102460358Telephone: KEITH POWERSContact: CAR000258061GEPAID: 2016Year: S118585227envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryMethod Decode: Alkaline solution without metals pH >= 12.5Cat Decode: 0.0415Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Alkaline solution without metals pH >= 12.5Waste Category: 99TSD County: NVD980895338TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: PLEASANTON, CA 94588Mailing City,St,Zip: 5918 STONERIDGE MALL RDMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 5102460358Telephone: KEITH POWERSContact: CAR000258061GEPAID: 2016Year: S118585227envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryMethod Decode: Pharmaceutical wasteCat Decode: SAFEWAY STORE #3251 (Continued)S118585227 TC5374254.2s Page 69 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 12 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access Santa ClaraFacility County: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryMethod Decode: Unspecified solvent mixtureCat Decode: 0.083Tons: SAFEWAY STORE #3251 (Continued) S118585227 manifest, or bills of lading copies for three years. Failure to maintain uniform hazardous waste manifest, consolidatedViolation Description: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.40(a) 22 CCR 12 66262.40(a) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 04-28-2016Violation Date: Safeway Store 3251Site Name: 64055Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: CORROSIVE AEROSOL. BAGGED TOGETHER, UNIVERSAL WASTE BATTERIES, FLAMMABLE AEROSOL, Returned to compliance on 05/09/2016. OBSERVED SEVERAL CONTAINERSViolation Notes: container. Failure to accumulate or store hazardous waste in a lined/compatibleViolation Description: 1, Section(s) 265.172 40 CFR 1 265.172 - U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, ChapterCitation: 04-28-2016Violation Date: Safeway Store 3251Site Name: 64055Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: WASTE STORAGE AREA, THE TOTES WERE BLOCKED BY A PALLET OF FOOD. Returned to compliance on 05/09/2016. WHEN I ARRIVED TO THE HAZARDOUSViolation Notes: space is not needed for any of these purposes. emergency, unless it can be demonstrated to the Department that aisle decontamination equipment to any area of facility operation in an personnel, fire protection, spill control equipment, and Failure to maintain aisle space to allow the unobstructed movement ofViolation Description: 1, Section(s) 265.35 40 CFR 1 265.35 - U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, ChapterCitation: 04-28-2016Violation Date: Safeway Store 3251Site Name: 64055Site ID: Violations: Hazardous Waste GeneratorCERS Description: 10502017CERS ID: 64055Site ID: CERS HAZ WASTE: 491 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster D 0.093 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 216 ft. < 1/8 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 WNW CERS20620 HOMESTEAD RD N/A D20 CERS HAZ WASTESAFEWAY STORE 3251 S121789630 TC5374254.2s Page 70 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERSEval Source: HWEval Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEval Division: THE WALK THROUGH WAS CONDUCTED APRIL 27, 2016 AND CONCLUDED TODAY.Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: YesViolations Found: 04-28-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Ocupancy ID: 3160Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-21-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: FLE -008517722 FLE -008490935 FLE -006240670 FLE -008436858 FLE -008436859 FLE -008517909 FLE -008663539 FLE -008436859 MANIFEST FAILED TO BE SUBMITTED TO DTSC WITHIN 30 DAYS AS REQUIRED: Returned to compliance on 05/09/2016. THE FOLLOWING HAZARDOUS WASTEViolation Notes: Failure to send hazardous waste manifest copies to DTSC.Violation Description: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.23(a)(4) 22 CCR 12 66262.23(a)(4) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 04-28-2016Violation Date: Safeway Store 3251Site Name: 64055Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: PHYSICAL AND CONTENT OF WASTE. PHARMACY -PLASTIC TOTE MARKED AS TOXIC PHARMACEUTICAL MISSING THE -PLASTIC TOTE OF CORROSIVE WASTE MISSING THE ACCUMULATION START DATE CONTAINERS MISSING THE REQUIRED HAZARDOUS WASTE MARKINGS: ICC AREA Returned to compliance on 05/09/2016. OBSERVED THE FOLLOWINGViolation Notes: Waste, and starting accumulation date. generator, physical and chemical characteristics of the Hazardous the following requirements: "Hazardous Waste", name and address of the Failure to properly label hazardous waste accumulation containers withViolation Description: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.34(f) 22 CCR 12 66262.34(f) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 04-28-2016Violation Date: Safeway Store 3251Site Name: 64055Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: -008663539 FLE -008436859 FLE -008517722 FLR AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: -008436858 FLE -008436859 FLE -008517909 FLE Returned to compliance on 05/09/2016. THE FOLLOWING TSDF WERE NOTViolation Notes: SAFEWAY STORE 3251 (Continued) S121789630 TC5374254.2s Page 71 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Environmental ManagerEntity Title: Ron LeeEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 85038Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: AZAffiliation State: PhoenixAffiliation City: PO Box 29096, MS 6515Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 469-7513Affiliation Phone: 94588Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: PleasantonAffiliation City: 5918 Stoneridge Mall Rd.Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Ron LeeEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Keith PowersEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: -122.034170Longitude: 37.337500Latitude: Center of a facility or station.Ref Point Type Desc: Not reportedCoord Name: 10502017Program ID: HWGEnv Int Type Code: Safeway Store 3251Facility Name: 64055Site ID: Coordinates: SAFEWAY STORE 3251 (Continued) S121789630 TC5374254.2s Page 72 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Ron LeeEntity Name: Secondary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 446-0700Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: 10600 N DEANZA BLVD STE 200Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Sobrato InterestsEntity Name: Property OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 253-0112Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Store DirectorEntity Title: Senad ZagovicEntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Safeway, Inc.Entity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 469-7000Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Safeway, Inc.Entity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 469-7000Affiliation Phone: 94588Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: PleasantonAffiliation City: 5918 Stoneridge Mall Rd.Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Safeway, Inc.Entity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: SAFEWAY STORE 3251 (Continued)S121789630 TC5374254.2s Page 73 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: -008663539 FLE -008436859 FLE -008517722 FLR AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW: -008436858 FLE -008436859 FLE -008517909 FLE Returned to compliance on 05/09/2016. THE FOLLOWING TSDF WERE NOTViolation Notes: manifest, or bills of lading copies for three years. Failure to maintain uniform hazardous waste manifest, consolidatedViolation Description: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.40(a) 22 CCR 12 66262.40(a) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 04-28-2016Violation Date: Safeway Store 3251Site Name: 64055Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: CORROSIVE AEROSOL. BAGGED TOGETHER, UNIVERSAL WASTE BATTERIES, FLAMMABLE AEROSOL, Returned to compliance on 05/09/2016. OBSERVED SEVERAL CONTAINERSViolation Notes: container. Failure to accumulate or store hazardous waste in a lined/compatibleViolation Description: 1, Section(s) 265.172 40 CFR 1 265.172 - U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, ChapterCitation: 04-28-2016Violation Date: Safeway Store 3251Site Name: 64055Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: WASTE STORAGE AREA, THE TOTES WERE BLOCKED BY A PALLET OF FOOD. Returned to compliance on 05/09/2016. WHEN I ARRIVED TO THE HAZARDOUSViolation Notes: space is not needed for any of these purposes. emergency, unless it can be demonstrated to the Department that aisle decontamination equipment to any area of facility operation in an personnel, fire protection, spill control equipment, and Failure to maintain aisle space to allow the unobstructed movement ofViolation Description: 1, Section(s) 265.35 40 CFR 1 265.35 - U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, ChapterCitation: 04-28-2016Violation Date: Safeway Store 3251Site Name: 64055Site ID: Violations: Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description: 10502017CERS ID: 64055Site ID: CERS TANKS: (925) 389-7937Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Environmental ManagerEntity Title: SAFEWAY STORE 3251 (Continued) S121789630 TC5374254.2s Page 74 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Safeway Store 3251Facility Name: 64055Site ID: Coordinates: CERSEval Source: HWEval Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEval Division: THE WALK THROUGH WAS CONDUCTED APRIL 27, 2016 AND CONCLUDED TODAY.Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: YesViolations Found: 04-28-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Ocupancy ID: 3160Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-21-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: FLE -008517722 FLE -008490935 FLE -006240670 FLE -008436858 FLE -008436859 FLE -008517909 FLE -008663539 FLE -008436859 MANIFEST FAILED TO BE SUBMITTED TO DTSC WITHIN 30 DAYS AS REQUIRED: Returned to compliance on 05/09/2016. THE FOLLOWING HAZARDOUS WASTEViolation Notes: Failure to send hazardous waste manifest copies to DTSC.Violation Description: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.23(a)(4) 22 CCR 12 66262.23(a)(4) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 04-28-2016Violation Date: Safeway Store 3251Site Name: 64055Site ID: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: PHYSICAL AND CONTENT OF WASTE. PHARMACY -PLASTIC TOTE MARKED AS TOXIC PHARMACEUTICAL MISSING THE -PLASTIC TOTE OF CORROSIVE WASTE MISSING THE ACCUMULATION START DATE CONTAINERS MISSING THE REQUIRED HAZARDOUS WASTE MARKINGS: ICC AREA Returned to compliance on 05/09/2016. OBSERVED THE FOLLOWINGViolation Notes: Waste, and starting accumulation date. generator, physical and chemical characteristics of the Hazardous the following requirements: "Hazardous Waste", name and address of the Failure to properly label hazardous waste accumulation containers withViolation Description: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.34(f) 22 CCR 12 66262.34(f) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 04-28-2016Violation Date: Safeway Store 3251Site Name: 64055Site ID: CERSViolation Source: SAFEWAY STORE 3251 (Continued) S121789630 TC5374254.2s Page 75 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Environmental ManagerEntity Title: Ron LeeEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 85038Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: AZAffiliation State: PhoenixAffiliation City: PO Box 29096, MS 6515Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 469-7513Affiliation Phone: 94588Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: PleasantonAffiliation City: 5918 Stoneridge Mall Rd.Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Ron LeeEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Keith PowersEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: -122.034170Longitude: 37.337500Latitude: Center of a facility or station.Ref Point Type Desc: Not reportedCoord Name: 10502017Program ID: HWGEnv Int Type Code: SAFEWAY STORE 3251 (Continued)S121789630 TC5374254.2s Page 76 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Environmental ManagerEntity Title: Ron LeeEntity Name: Secondary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 446-0700Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: 10600 N DEANZA BLVD STE 200Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Sobrato InterestsEntity Name: Property OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 253-0112Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Store DirectorEntity Title: Senad ZagovicEntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Safeway, Inc.Entity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 469-7000Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Safeway, Inc.Entity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 469-7000Affiliation Phone: 94588Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: PleasantonAffiliation City: 5918 Stoneridge Mall Rd.Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Safeway, Inc.Entity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: SAFEWAY STORE 3251 (Continued)S121789630 TC5374254.2s Page 77 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (925) 389-7937Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: SAFEWAY STORE 3251 (Continued) S121789630 -122.03177Longitude: 37.33797Latitude: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthPermitting Agency: 2096-12-77Facility ID: UST: 552 ft. Site 1 of 8 in cluster E 0.105 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 204 ft. < 1/8 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 NNE 11010 DE ANZA BL N/A E21 USTCHEVRON STATION #95700 U004261796 43-0172Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 43Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 552 ft. Site 2 of 8 in cluster E 0.105 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 204 ft. < 1/8 CUPERTINO, CA NNE 11010 DE ANZA N/A E22 HIST CORTESECHEVRON S105027745 T0608500238Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: All Files are on GeoTracker or in the Local Agency DatabaseFile Location: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: Not reportedRB Case Number: USTCase Worker: 08/02/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -122.031353Longitude: 37.312724Latitude: T0608500238Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0608500238Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPLead Agency: LUST: CERS 552 ft.CHMIRSSite 3 of 8 in cluster E 0.105 mi.HIST UST Relative: Lower Actual: 204 ft. < 1/8 SWEEPS USTCUPERTINO, CA 95014 NNE HIST LUST11010 N DE ANZA BLVD N/A E23 LUST95700 U001600974 TC5374254.2s Page 78 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 02/13/2001Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 02/08/1999Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 07/11/2001Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: Verbal CommunicationAction: 07/11/2001Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: Request for ClosureAction: 01/10/2001Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: Other WorkplanAction: 07/16/2001Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 01/03/2001Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: Preliminary Site Assessment ReportAction: 08/31/1993Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: LUST: 4089183400Phone Number: Not reportedEmail: SAN JOSECity: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Address: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: UST CASE WORKERContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608500238Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: Not reportedEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: Regional Water BoardContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: 95700 (Continued)U001600974 TC5374254.2s Page 79 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 04/02/1993Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 05/09/1999Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: Staff Letter - #21267Action: 01/29/1999Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: Staff Letter - #21263Action: 03/31/1993Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: Staff Letter - #21269Action: 02/08/1999Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #39493Action: 01/16/1996Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: CorrespondenceAction: 04/23/1999Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 09/29/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: Tank Removal Report / UST Sampling ReportAction: 05/06/1993Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: Preliminary Site Assessment WorkplanAction: 03/15/1999Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: CorrespondenceAction: 08/08/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: 95700 (Continued)U001600974 TC5374254.2s Page 80 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SCVWDOversite Agency: 07S2W12G02SCVWD ID: 2Region Code: SANTA CLARARegion: HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: 07S2W12G02FEDR Link ID: 08/02/2001Date Closed: 07S2W12G02FSCVWD ID: SANTA CLARARegion: LUST SANTA CLARA: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: 3/23/1993Preliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Discovered: 07S2W12G02fCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 08/02/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608500238Global Id: 03/23/1993Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608500238Global Id: 01/01/1992Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608500238Global Id: LUST: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 08/02/2001Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 01/01/1992Date: OtherAction Type: T0608500238Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 02/05/1999Date: 95700 (Continued)U001600974 TC5374254.2s Page 81 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 62800Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: LEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 6000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 43-012-062800-000003SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-031913Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 62800Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: LEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 5000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 43-012-062800-000002SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-031913Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 62800Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: 5Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 10000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 43-012-062800-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-031913Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 62800Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: 2001-08-02 00:00:00Closed Date: 1993-05-26 00:00:00Date Listed: 95700 (Continued)U001600974 TC5374254.2s Page 82 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation DAYNER, FRANK RContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000062800Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: Not reportedSTG: Not reportedTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: Not reportedCapacity: Not reportedTank Status: Not reportedSWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 03-08-94Action Date: 08-12-93Referral Date: 44-031913Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 62800Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WASTESTG: OILTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 550Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 43-012-062800-000005SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-031913Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 62800Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 10000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 43-012-062800-000004SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-031913Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 95700 (Continued)U001600974 TC5374254.2s Page 83 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate Completed: Not reportedOES Time: Not reportedOES Date: 03/02/2018OES notification: 18-1391OES Incident Number: CHMIRS: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 0000100Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000550Tank Capacity: 1959Year Installed: 5Container Num: 005Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 0000250Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1976Year Installed: 4Container Num: 004Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 0000250Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00006000Tank Capacity: 1959Year Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 0000250Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00005000Tank Capacity: 1959Year Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 0000250Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1976Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0005Total Tanks: SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Owner City,St,Zip: 575 MARKETOwner Address: CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.Owner Name: 4087739135Telephone: 95700 (Continued)U001600974 TC5374254.2s Page 84 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: No#3 Pipeline: No#2 Pipeline: No#1 Pipeline: Not reportedNumber of Fatalities: Not reportedNumber of Injuries: Not reportedEvacuations: Not reportedSubstance #3: Not reportedSubstance #2: Not reportedUnknown: 20Quantity Released: GasolineSubstance: Not reportedE Date: Not reportedSite Type: YesContained: Not reportedAmount: Santa Clara County Department of Environmental HealthAdmin Agency: 03/02/2018Incident Date: ChevronAgency: 2018Year: 1015Date/Time: Not reportedOther: Oz.Measure: PETROLEUMType: Not reportedOther: Not reportedMeasure: Not reportedType: Not reportedWhat Happened: Not reportedContainment: Reporting PartyCleanup By: Service StationSpill Site: Not reportedWaterway: NoWaterway Involved: Not reportedFacility Telephone: Not reportedReport Date: Not reportedReporting Officer Name/ID: Not reportedCompany Name: Not reportedCA DOT PUC/ICC Number: Not reportedVehicle Id Number: Not reportedVehicle State: Not reportedVehicle License Number: Not reportedVehicle Make/year: Not reportedOthers Number Of Fatalities: Not reportedOthers Number Of Injuries: Not reportedOthers Number Of Decontaminated: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reportedResp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reportedMore Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reportedProperty Management: Not reportedEstimated Temperature: Not reportedSurrounding Area: Not reportedTime Completed: Not reportedTime Notified: Not reportedAgency Incident Number: Not reportedAgency Id Number: Not reportedProperty Use: 95700 (Continued)U001600974 TC5374254.2s Page 85 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: OAKLANDAffiliation City: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Regional Water Board - SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: 4089183400Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN JOSEAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: UST CASE WORKER - SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPEntity Name: Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description: T0608500238CERS ID: 208313Site ID: CERS TANKS: of the release. impacted. The station personnel conducted cleanup been stopped. No waterways or storm drains were release of 20 ounces of gasoline. The release has and an overfill occurred, which caused the RP states, A customer was fueling their vehicleDescription: Not reportedComments: NoFatals: NoInjuries: NoEvacs: Yes#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: No#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: 95700 (Continued)U001600974 -122.031021Longitude: 37.3393855Latitude: CAMPBELL,CUPERTINO,LOS GATOS,MORGAN HILLPermitting Agency: 33Facility ID: UST: 552 ft. Site 4 of 8 in cluster E 0.105 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 204 ft. < 1/8 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 NNE 11010 N DE ANZA BL N/A E24 USTCHEVRON SERVICE STATION #95700 U003948819 TC5374254.2s Page 86 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedReporting Officer Name/ID: Not reportedCompany Name: Not reportedCA DOT PUC/ICC Number: Not reportedVehicle Id Number: Not reportedVehicle State: Not reportedVehicle License Number: Not reportedVehicle Make/year: Not reportedOthers Number Of Fatalities: Not reportedOthers Number Of Injuries: Not reportedOthers Number Of Decontaminated: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Fatalities: Not reportedResponding Agency Personel # Of Injuries: Not reportedResp Agncy Personel # Of Decontaminated: Not reportedMore Than Two Substances Involved?: Not reportedProperty Management: Not reportedEstimated Temperature: Not reportedSurrounding Area: Not reportedTime Completed: Not reportedTime Notified: Not reportedAgency Incident Number: Not reportedAgency Id Number: Not reportedProperty Use: Not reportedDate Completed: Not reportedOES Time: Not reportedOES Date: 12/17/2012OES notification: 12-7695OES Incident Number: CHMIRS: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002D05D.pdfURL: 0002D05DFile Number: HIST UST: 552 ft. Site 5 of 8 in cluster E 0.105 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 204 ft. < 1/8 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 NNE CHMIRS11010 NO DEANZA BLVD N/A E25 HIST UST95700 S113471897 TC5374254.2s Page 87 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ABSORBENT PADS ON THE SPILL." 16 OUNCES OF GASOLINE ONTO THE GROUND." "PLACED CUSTOMER OVERFILLED THEIR GAS TANK AND DISCHARGED Quoting the NRC Report: "CALLER STATED THAT ADescription: Not reportedComments: Not reportedFatals: Not reportedInjuries: Not reportedEvacs: Not reported#3 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#2 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#1 Vessel >= 300 Tons: Not reported#3 Pipeline: Not reported#2 Pipeline: Not reported#1 Pipeline: Not reportedNumber of Fatalities: Not reportedNumber of Injuries: Not reportedEvacuations: Not reportedSubstance #3: Not reportedSubstance #2: Not reportedUnknown: 16Quantity Released: Unleaded GasSubstance: Not reportedE Date: Not reportedSite Type: YesContained: Not reportedAmount: Santa Clara County Health DepartmentAdmin Agency: 12/17/2012Incident Date: NRCAgency: 2012Year: 1440Date/Time: Not reportedOther: Oz.Measure: Not reportedType: Not reportedWhat Happened: Not reportedContainment: Reporting PartyCleanup By: Service StationSpill Site: Not reportedWaterway: NoWaterway Involved: Not reportedFacility Telephone: Not reportedReport Date: 95700 (Continued)S113471897 KATHY NORRISContact: SAN RAMON, CA 94583 P O BOX 6004Mailing address: CAR000122382EPA ID: CUPERTINO, CA 95014-0443 11010 N DE ANZA BLVDFacility address: CHEVRON STATION NO 95700Facility name: 06/17/2002Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 552 ft. Site 6 of 8 in cluster E 0.105 mi.HAZNET Relative: Lower Actual: 204 ft. < 1/8 ECHOCUPERTINO, CA 95014 NNE FINDS11010 N DE ANZA BLVD CAR000122382 E26 RCRA-SQGCHEVRON STATION NO 95700 1005904411 TC5374254.2s Page 88 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation BENZENE. Waste name: D018. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 925-842-5931Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: SAN RAMON, CA 94583 P O BOX 6004Owner/operator address: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 925-842-5931Contact telephone: USContact country: SAN RAMON, CA 94583 P O BOX 6004Contact address: CHEVRON STATION NO 95700 (Continued) 1005904411 TC5374254.2s Page 89 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedMailing Name: 8773866044Telephone: KWAME AWUKUContact: CAR000122382GEPAID: 2016Year: 1005904411envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryMethod Decode: Other organic solidsCat Decode: 0.43Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Other organic solidsWaste Category: Santa ClaraTSD County: CAD059494310TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: SAN RAMON, CA 945830000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 6004Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 8773866044Telephone: KWAME AWUKUContact: CAR000122382GEPAID: 2016Year: 1005904411envid: HAZNET: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110012543453DFR URL: 110012543453Registry ID: 1005904411Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110012543453Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: CHEVRON STATION NO 95700 (Continued) 1005904411 TC5374254.2s Page 90 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 8773866044Telephone: KATHY NORRIS-SLUSHERContact: CAR000122382GEPAID: 2014Year: 1005904411envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.146Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Other organic solidsWaste Category: Santa ClaraTSD County: CAD059494310TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: SAN RAMON, CA 945830000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 6004Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 8773866044Telephone: KATHY NORRIS-SLUSHERContact: CAR000122382GEPAID: 2015Year: 1005904411envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.2095Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Santa ClaraTSD County: CAD059494310TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: SAN RAMON, CA 945830000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 6004Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 8773866044Telephone: KATHY NORRIS-SLUSHERContact: CAR000122382GEPAID: 2015Year: 1005904411envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryMethod Decode: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentCat Decode: 0.0675Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Santa ClaraTSD County: CAD059494310TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: SAN RAMON, CA 945830000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 6004Mailing Address: CHEVRON STATION NO 95700 (Continued) 1005904411 TC5374254.2s Page 91 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 37 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.025Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Santa ClaraTSD County: CAD059494310TSD EPA ID: Santa ClaraGen County: SAN RAMON, CA 945830000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 6004Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: CHEVRON STATION NO 95700 (Continued) 1005904411 Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2014 CHEVRON STATIONS INC Gasoline Service Stations2013 APSI Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2013 CHEVRON STATIONS INC Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2012 CHEVRON STATIONS INC Gasoline Service Stations2012 APSI Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2011 CHEVRON STATIONS INC Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2010 CHEVRON STATIONS INC Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2009 CHEVRON STATIONS INC Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2008 CHEVRON STATIONS INC Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2007 CHEVRON STATIONS INC Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2006 CHEVRON STATIONS INC Gasoline Service Stations, NEC2005 CHEVRON STATIONS INC Gasoline Service Stations2004 CHEVRON STATIONS INC Gasoline Service Stations2003 CHEVRON STATIONS INC Gasoline Service Stations2002 CHEVRON STATIONS INC Gasoline Service Stations2001 CHEVRON STATIONS INC Gasoline Service Stations2000 CHEVRON STATIONS INC Gasoline Service Stations1999 CHEVRON STATIONS INC Gasoline Service Stations1998 CHEVRON STATION INC Gasoline Service Stations1997 CHEVRON USA INC Gasoline Service Stations1996 CHEVRON USA INC Gasoline Service Stations1995 CHEVRON USA INC Gasoline Service Stations1994 CHEVRON USA INC Gasoline Service Stations1993 CHEVRON USA INC Gasoline Service Stations1992 CHEVRON USA INC Gasoline Service Stations1991 CHEVRON USA INC Gasoline Service Stations1990 CHEVRON USA INC Gasoline Service Stations1989 CHEVRON USA INC Type:Year: Name: EDR Hist Auto 552 ft. Site 7 of 8 in cluster E 0.105 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 204 ft. < 1/8 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 NNE 11010 N DE ANZA BLVD N/A E27 EDR Hist AutoCHEVRON STATIONS INC 1022066092 TC5374254.2s Page 92 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoViolations Found: 04-04-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-04-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-17-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-17-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-13-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-13-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description: 10344487CERS ID: 104964Site ID: CERS TANKS: 552 ft. Site 8 of 8 in cluster E 0.105 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 204 ft. < 1/8 CERS TANKSCUPERTINO, CA 95014 NNE CERS HAZ WASTE11010 DE ANZA BL N/A E28 CERSCHEVRON STATION #95700 S121737779 TC5374254.2s Page 93 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 842-9002Affiliation Phone: 94583Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN RAMONAffiliation City: PO BOX 6004, ATTN: PERMIT DESKAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY ( A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A.)Entity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: TED LAMPHEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-04-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-04-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Ocupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: CHEVRON STATION #95700 (Continued)S121737779 TC5374254.2s Page 94 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (510) 231-0623Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: STATION MANAGEREntity Title: MANAGEREntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY (A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.)Entity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 773-9135Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY ( A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A.)Entity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 842-9002Affiliation Phone: 94583Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN RAMONAffiliation City: PO BOX 6004, ATTN: PERMIT DESKAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY ( A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A.)Entity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Retail OE/HES SpecialistEntity Title: Ted LamphEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 94583Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN RAMONAffiliation City: PO BOX 6004, ATTN: PERMIT DESKAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON STATION #95700 (Continued)S121737779 TC5374254.2s Page 95 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN RAMONAffiliation City: P.O. BOX 6004, ATTN: PERMIT DESKAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY (A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.)Entity Name: UST Tank OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 842-9002Affiliation Phone: 94583Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN RAMONAffiliation City: P.O. BOX 6004, ATTN: PERMIT DESKAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY (A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.)Entity Name: UST Tank OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 266-8942Affiliation Phone: 95015Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: BOX 361Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CUPERTINO DE ORO CLUBEntity Name: UST Property Owner NameAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 842-9002Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: RETAIL HESEntity Title: CHARLES BITTLE - 5/11/2016Entity Name: UST Permit ApplicantAffiliation Type Desc: (800) 231-0623Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: STAFFEntity Title: CHEVRON EMERGENCY INFORMATION CENTEREntity Name: Secondary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 266-8942Affiliation Phone: 95015Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: BOX 361Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CUPERTINO DE ORO CLUBEntity Name: Property OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: CHEVRON STATION #95700 (Continued)S121737779 TC5374254.2s Page 96 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 04-04-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-04-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-17-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-17-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-13-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-13-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: Hazardous Waste GeneratorCERS Description: 10344487CERS ID: 104964Site ID: CERS HAZ WASTE: (925) 842-9002Affiliation Phone: 94583Affiliation Zip: CHEVRON STATION #95700 (Continued) S121737779 TC5374254.2s Page 97 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 842-9002Affiliation Phone: 94583Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN RAMONAffiliation City: PO BOX 6004, ATTN: PERMIT DESKAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY ( A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A.)Entity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: TED LAMPHEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-04-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-04-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Ocupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: CHEVRON STATION #95700 (Continued)S121737779 TC5374254.2s Page 98 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: STATION MANAGEREntity Title: MANAGEREntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY (A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.)Entity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 773-9135Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY ( A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A.)Entity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 842-9002Affiliation Phone: 94583Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN RAMONAffiliation City: PO BOX 6004, ATTN: PERMIT DESKAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY ( A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A.)Entity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Retail OE/HES SpecialistEntity Title: Ted LamphEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 94583Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN RAMONAffiliation City: PO BOX 6004, ATTN: PERMIT DESKAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: CHEVRON STATION #95700 (Continued)S121737779 TC5374254.2s Page 99 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN RAMONAffiliation City: P.O. BOX 6004, ATTN: PERMIT DESKAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY (A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.)Entity Name: UST Tank OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 842-9002Affiliation Phone: 94583Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN RAMONAffiliation City: P.O. BOX 6004, ATTN: PERMIT DESKAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY (A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.)Entity Name: UST Tank OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 266-8942Affiliation Phone: 95015Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: BOX 361Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CUPERTINO DE ORO CLUBEntity Name: UST Property Owner NameAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 842-9002Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: RETAIL HESEntity Title: CHARLES BITTLE - 5/11/2016Entity Name: UST Permit ApplicantAffiliation Type Desc: (800) 231-0623Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: STAFFEntity Title: CHEVRON EMERGENCY INFORMATION CENTEREntity Name: Secondary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 266-8942Affiliation Phone: 95015Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: BOX 361Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CUPERTINO DE ORO CLUBEntity Name: Property OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (510) 231-0623Affiliation Phone: CHEVRON STATION #95700 (Continued)S121737779 TC5374254.2s Page 100 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-04-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-17-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-17-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-13-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 03-13-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: Underground Storage TankCERS Description: 10344487CERS ID: 104964Site ID: CERS TANKS: (925) 842-9002Affiliation Phone: 94583Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CHEVRON STATION #95700 (Continued) S121737779 TC5374254.2s Page 101 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (925) 842-9002Affiliation Phone: 94583Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN RAMONAffiliation City: PO BOX 6004, ATTN: PERMIT DESKAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY ( A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A.)Entity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: TED LAMPHEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-04-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-04-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Ocupancy ID: 2096Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 04-04-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CHEVRON STATION #95700 (Continued)S121737779 TC5374254.2s Page 102 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: STATION MANAGEREntity Title: MANAGEREntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY (A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.)Entity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 773-9135Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY ( A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A.)Entity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 842-9002Affiliation Phone: 94583Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN RAMONAffiliation City: PO BOX 6004, ATTN: PERMIT DESKAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY ( A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A.)Entity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Retail OE/HES SpecialistEntity Title: Ted LamphEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 94583Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN RAMONAffiliation City: PO BOX 6004, ATTN: PERMIT DESKAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: CHEVRON STATION #95700 (Continued)S121737779 TC5374254.2s Page 103 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation P.O. BOX 6004, ATTN: PERMIT DESKAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY (A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.)Entity Name: UST Tank OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 842-9002Affiliation Phone: 94583Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN RAMONAffiliation City: P.O. BOX 6004, ATTN: PERMIT DESKAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANY (A DIVISION OF CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.)Entity Name: UST Tank OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 266-8942Affiliation Phone: 95015Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: BOX 361Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CUPERTINO DE ORO CLUBEntity Name: UST Property Owner NameAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 842-9002Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: RETAIL HESEntity Title: CHARLES BITTLE - 5/11/2016Entity Name: UST Permit ApplicantAffiliation Type Desc: (800) 231-0623Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: STAFFEntity Title: CHEVRON EMERGENCY INFORMATION CENTEREntity Name: Secondary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 266-8942Affiliation Phone: 95015Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: BOX 361Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CUPERTINO DE ORO CLUBEntity Name: Property OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (510) 231-0623Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: CHEVRON STATION #95700 (Continued)S121737779 TC5374254.2s Page 104 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (925) 842-9002Affiliation Phone: 94583Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN RAMONAffiliation City: CHEVRON STATION #95700 (Continued) S121737779 00001000Tank Capacity: 1970Year Installed: 4Container Num: 004Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 0000250Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1970Year Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 0000250Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00005000Tank Capacity: 1970Year Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 0000250Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1970Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0004Total Tanks: SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Owner City,St,Zip: 575 MARKETOwner Address: CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.Owner Name: 4082571151Telephone: PHILLIPS,JAMES LContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000062833Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002D066.pdfURL: 0002D066File Number: HIST UST: 643 ft. 0.122 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 207 ft. < 1/8 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 NNW 10023 SNYVLE SRTGA RD N/A 29 HIST UST95954 U001600975 TC5374254.2s Page 105 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 0000130Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 95954 (Continued)U001600975 FA0270328Facility ID: PR0402439Record ID: -122.03512Longitude: 37.33753Latitude: GENERATES < 100 KG/YRProgram Description: 2202PE#: SANTA CLARARegion: CUPA SANTA CLARA: 680 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster F 0.129 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 216 ft. 1/8-1/4 CUPERTINO, CA 95041 WNW 20640 HOMESTEAD RD N/A F30 CUPA ListingsMICHAELS STORE #6818 S103640868 On site to conduct a routine hazardous waste inspection Observed theEval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: YesViolations Found: 08-23-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: CERSViolation Source: HWViolation Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthViolation Division: of the following manifests: -008491379FLE -008663488FLE -008666754FLE Returned to compliance on 09/14/2017. Facility is missing TSDF copiesViolation Notes: designated facility which received the waste. for transport shall be kept until receiving a signed copy from the transporter. The manifest signed at the time the waste was accepted three years from the date the waste was accepted by the initial Failure to keep a copy of each properly signed manifest for at leastViolation Description: Chapter 12, Section(s) 66262.40(a) 22 CCR 12 66262.40(a) - California Code of Regulations, Title 22,Citation: 08-23-2017Violation Date: Michael’s Store # 6818Site Name: 134915Site ID: Violations: Hazardous Waste GeneratorCERS Description: 10349038CERS ID: 134915Site ID: CERS HAZ WASTE: 680 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster F 0.129 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 216 ft. 1/8-1/4 CUPERTINO, CA 95041 WNW CERS20640 HOMESTEAD RD N/A F31 CERS HAZ WASTEMICHAEL’S STORE # 6818 S121743345 TC5374254.2s Page 106 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 75063Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: TXAffiliation State: IRVINGAffiliation City: 8000 BENT BRANCH DRAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (972) 409-5786Affiliation Phone: 75063Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: TXAffiliation State: IrvingAffiliation City: 8000 Bent Branch DriveAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Ryan DraperEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Chris OrtegaEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: CERSEval Source: HWEval Program: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEval Division: inspection was missing the physical state markings. Markings were added during were added during inspection 1 x 10 gallon container of toxic wastes flammable wastes was missing the physical state markings. Markings violations were corrected on site: 1 x 10 gallon container of waste management EPA ID# CAL000371242 is active The following inspected weekly Employees are thoroughly familiar with hazardous posted on site Spill control is available on site Container areas are extinguishers have had annual maintenance Emergency information is container of oxidizers 1 x 10 gallon container of universal waste Fire 1 x 10 gallon container of corrosive bases waste 1 x 10 gallon gallon container of toxics 1 x 10 gallon container of corrosive acids following wastes on site: 1 x 10 gallon container of flammables 1 x 10 MICHAEL’S STORE # 6818 (Continued) S121743345 TC5374254.2s Page 107 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: DISTRICT ManagerEntity Title: JOSEPH KOCHEREntity Name: Secondary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (972) 409-1306Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Store ManagerEntity Title: Julie SandersEntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Michaels Stores, Inc.Entity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (972) 409-5786Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Michaels Stores, Inc.Entity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (972) 409-5786Affiliation Phone: 75063Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: TXAffiliation State: IRVINGAffiliation City: 8000 BENT BRANCH DRAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Michaels Stores, Inc.Entity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Safety ManagerEntity Title: Ryan DraperEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: MICHAEL’S STORE # 6818 (Continued)S121743345 TC5374254.2s Page 108 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (972) 409-1306Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: MICHAEL’S STORE # 6818 (Continued) S121743345 Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (713) 985-5472Affiliation Phone: 77056Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: TXAffiliation State: HoustonAffiliation City: 5151 San Felipe St, Ste 1000Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: ASHLEY CAMPBELLEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: ASHLEY CAMPBELLEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: -122.034850Longitude: 37.336590Latitude: Center of a facility or station.Ref Point Type Desc: Not reportedCoord Name: 10632046Program ID: HWGEnv Int Type Code: Ross Store #1733Facility Name: 277473Site ID: Coordinates: Hazardous Waste GeneratorCERS Description: 10632046CERS ID: 277473Site ID: CERS HAZ WASTE: 847 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster F 0.160 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 217 ft. 1/8-1/4 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 WNW CERS20650 HOMESTEAD RD N/A F32 CERS HAZ WASTEROSS STORE #1733 S121759492 TC5374254.2s Page 109 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (855) 257-7472Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: ManagerEntity Title: Store ManagerEntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Ross Stores, Inc.Entity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 965-4831Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Ross Dress For Less, Inc.Entity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 965-4831Affiliation Phone: 94568-7579Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: DublinAffiliation City: 5130 Hacienda DrAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Ross Dress For Less, Inc.Entity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SPECIALISTEntity Title: Ashley CampbellEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 94568-7579Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: DublinAffiliation City: 5130 Hacienda DrAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: ROSS STORE #1733 (Continued)S121759492 TC5374254.2s Page 110 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (713) 985-5472Affiliation Phone: 77056Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: TXAffiliation State: HoustonAffiliation City: 5151 San Felipe St, Ste 1000Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: ASHLEY CAMPBELLEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: ASHLEY CAMPBELLEntity Name: Document PreparerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: -122.034850Longitude: 37.336590Latitude: Center of a facility or station.Ref Point Type Desc: Not reportedCoord Name: 10632046Program ID: HWGEnv Int Type Code: Ross Store #1733Facility Name: 277473Site ID: Coordinates: Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description: 10632046CERS ID: 277473Site ID: CERS TANKS: (855) 257-7472Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: District ManagerEntity Title: Shana ZacekEntity Name: Secondary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: ROSS STORE #1733 (Continued)S121759492 TC5374254.2s Page 111 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: ManagerEntity Title: Store ManagerEntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Ross Stores, Inc.Entity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 965-4831Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Ross Dress For Less, Inc.Entity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (925) 965-4831Affiliation Phone: 94568-7579Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: DublinAffiliation City: 5130 Hacienda DrAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Ross Dress For Less, Inc.Entity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SPECIALISTEntity Title: Ashley CampbellEntity Name: Identification SignerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 94568-7579Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: DublinAffiliation City: 5130 Hacienda DrAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: ROSS STORE #1733 (Continued)S121759492 TC5374254.2s Page 112 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (855) 257-7472Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: District ManagerEntity Title: Shana ZacekEntity Name: Secondary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (855) 257-7472Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: ROSS STORE #1733 (Continued)S121759492 FA0200894Facility ID: PR0317388Record ID: -122.03586Longitude: 37.33741Latitude: OBSOLETE SELF-AUDIT GEN <5 TONS/YRProgram Description: 2253PE#: SANTA CLARARegion: CUPA SANTA CLARA: 847 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster F 0.160 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 217 ft. 1/8-1/4 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 WNW 20670 HOMESTEAD RD N/A F33 CUPA ListingsTHREE SEVEN 1 HR PHOTO S121468473 10412 SCENIC CIROwner/operator address: DAN NITTAOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 408-255-2047Contact telephone: USContact country: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 10412 SCENIC CIRCLEContact address: DAN NITTAContact: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 SCENIC CIRCLEMailing address: CAD983658782EPA ID: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 20670 HOMESTEAD RDFacility address: ONE HOUR MOTOPHOTOFacility name: 02/23/1995Date form received by agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 847 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster F 0.160 mi.HAZNET Relative: Higher Actual: 217 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOCUPERTINO, CA 95014 WNW FINDS20670 HOMESTEAD RD CAD983658782 F34 RCRA NonGen / NLRONE HOUR MOTOPHOTO 1000819865 TC5374254.2s Page 113 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation DSAN NITTAContact: CAD983658782GEPAID: 1994Year: 1000819865envid: HAZNET: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002892184DFR URL: 110002892184Registry ID: 1000819865Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002892184Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 408-255-2047Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 ONE HOUR MOTOPHOTO (Continued) 1000819865 TC5374254.2s Page 114 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 1.49999999999Tons: Not reportedDisposal Method: Metal sludge (Alkaline solution (pH >= 12.5) with metals)Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD003963592TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: CUPERTINO, CA 950140000Mailing City,St,Zip: 20670 HOMESTEAD RDMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 4082552047Telephone: DSAN NITTAContact: CAD983658782GEPAID: 1993Year: 1000819865envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: .2150Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Metal sludge (Alkaline solution (pH >= 12.5) with metals)Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD003963592TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: CUPERTINO, CA 950140000Mailing City,St,Zip: 20670 HOMESTEAD RDMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 4082552047Telephone: ONE HOUR MOTOPHOTO (Continued) 1000819865 43-0087Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 43Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1300 ft. Site 1 of 8 in cluster G 0.246 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 223 ft. 1/8-1/4 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 South 10625 DE ANZA N/A G35 HIST CORTESEARCO S101303578 http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0608500155Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPLead Agency: LUST: CERS TANKS CERS 1307 ft.CERS HAZ WASTESite 2 of 8 in cluster G 0.248 mi.CUPA Listings Relative: Higher Actual: 223 ft. 1/8-1/4 HIST USTCUPERTINO, CA 95014 South SWEEPS UST10625 N DE ANZA BL N/A G36 LUSTCUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR U001602453 TC5374254.2s Page 115 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08/18/1986Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: CorrespondenceAction: 04/11/2001Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Verbal CommunicationAction: 01/08/1996Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 09/09/1986Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 06/27/2001Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: LUST: 4089183400Phone Number: Not reportedEmail: SAN JOSECity: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Address: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: UST CASE WORKERContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608500155Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: Not reportedEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: Regional Water BoardContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608500155Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: All Files are on GeoTracker or in the Local Agency DatabaseFile Location: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: Not reportedRB Case Number: USTCase Worker: 06/27/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -122.0316Longitude: 37.3153Latitude: T0608500155Global Id: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR (Continued) U001602453 TC5374254.2s Page 116 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Staff Letter - #21293Action: 12/17/2000Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Staff Letter - #21286Action: 09/16/1999Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 08/21/1996Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 08/24/1995Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 06/09/1986Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 10/16/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Preliminary Site Assessment ReportAction: 06/09/1986Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: CorrespondenceAction: 01/22/1991Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Tank Removal Report / UST Sampling ReportAction: 11/20/1998Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Well Destruction ReportAction: 12/15/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/31/1999Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: ExcavationAction: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR (Continued) U001602453 TC5374254.2s Page 117 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 05/08/1986Date: OtherAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 11/12/2001Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 01/10/1994Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Unauthorized Release FormAction: 01/07/1999Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Other WorkplanAction: 02/14/1991Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 11/30/1995Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/31/2001Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 02/28/1996Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Staff Letter - #21273Action: 11/15/1995Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #39494Action: 11/13/1990Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: Staff Letter - #21275Action: 10/16/1995Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500155Global Id: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR (Continued) U001602453 TC5374254.2s Page 118 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 4000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 43-012-027088-000002SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 27088Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: 5Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 4000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 43-012-027088-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 27088Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: 07S2W12P01FEDR Link ID: 06/27/2001Date Closed: 07S2W12P01FSCVWD ID: SANTA CLARARegion: LUST SANTA CLARA: 06/27/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608500155Global Id: 03/12/1991Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608500155Global Id: 05/08/1986Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608500155Global Id: LUST: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 08/18/1986Date: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR (Continued) U001602453 TC5374254.2s Page 119 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 44-000506Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 27088Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WASTESTG: OILTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 225Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 43-012-027088-000011SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 27088Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WASTESTG: OILTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 250Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 43-012-027088-000005SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 27088Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 6000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 43-012-027088-000003SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 27088Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR (Continued)U001602453 TC5374254.2s Page 120 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ATank Status: 43-012-027088-000009SWRCB Tank Id: 4Owner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 05-25-94Action Date: 02-01-92Referral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 27088Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: PRM UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 02-21-92Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 43-012-027088-000008SWRCB Tank Id: 3-UNL-ROwner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 05-25-94Action Date: 02-01-92Referral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 27088Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 02-21-92Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 43-012-027088-000007SWRCB Tank Id: 2-UNL-ROwner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 05-25-94Action Date: 02-01-92Referral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 27088Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 5Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 07-21-92Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 43-012-027088-000006SWRCB Tank Id: 1-UNL-ROwner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 05-25-94Action Date: 02-01-92Referral Date: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR (Continued)U001602453 TC5374254.2s Page 121 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 003Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: 0000167Container Construction Thickness: 06Type of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00004000Tank Capacity: 1969Year Installed: 0000000002Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: 0000167Container Construction Thickness: 06Type of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00004000Tank Capacity: 1969Year Installed: 0000000001Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0006Total Tanks: LOS ANGELES, CA 90071Owner City,St,Zip: 515 SOUTH FLOWER STREETOwner Address: ARCO PETROLEUM PRODUCTS CO.Owner Name: 0000000000Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000027088Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WSTG: OILTank Use: 02-18-92Active Date: 550Capacity: ATank Status: 43-012-027088-000010SWRCB Tank Id: 4Owner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 05-25-94Action Date: 02-01-92Referral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 27088Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WSTG: OILTank Use: 02-21-92Active Date: 550Capacity: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR (Continued)U001602453 TC5374254.2s Page 122 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 07-02-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: Hazardous Waste GeneratorCERS Description: 10344274CERS ID: 109179Site ID: CERS HAZ WASTE: FA0271898Facility ID: PR0340033Record ID: -122.03272Longitude: 37.33212Latitude: GENERATES 100 KG YR TO <5 TONS/YRProgram Description: 2205PE#: SANTA CLARARegion: CUPA SANTA CLARA: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: 06Type of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1983Year Installed: 0000000006Container Num: 006Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 0000093Container Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000250Tank Capacity: 1969Year Installed: 0000000005Container Num: 005Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: 0000240Container Construction Thickness: 06Type of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00006000Tank Capacity: 1969Year Installed: 0000000004Container Num: 004Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: 0000240Container Construction Thickness: 06Type of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00006000Tank Capacity: 1969Year Installed: 0000000003Container Num: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR (Continued) U001602453 TC5374254.2s Page 123 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 09-16-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 08-24-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 08-24-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 08-10-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 08-10-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 07-02-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR (Continued) U001602453 TC5374254.2s Page 124 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Habib KhayyatEntity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: 10625 N DE ANZA BLAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: KHAYYAT, HABIBEntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: 10625 N DE ANZA BLAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 10625 N DE ANZA BLAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Habib KhayyatEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 09-16-2015Eval Date: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR (Continued)U001602453 TC5374254.2s Page 125 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Chemical Storage FacilitiesCERS Description: 10344274CERS ID: 109179Site ID: CERS TANKS: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 10625 N De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Habib KhayyatEntity Name: UST Tank OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 10625 N De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Habib KhayyatEntity Name: UST Tank OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 10625 N De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Habib KhayyatEntity Name: UST Property Owner NameAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: OwnerEntity Title: Habib KhayyatEntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIREntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR (Continued) U001602453 TC5374254.2s Page 126 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 09-16-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 08-24-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 08-24-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 08-10-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 08-10-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 07-02-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 07-02-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR (Continued)U001602453 TC5374254.2s Page 127 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: 10625 N DE ANZA BLAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: KHAYYAT, HABIBEntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: 10625 N DE ANZA BLAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 10625 N DE ANZA BLAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Habib KhayyatEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 09-16-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR (Continued)U001602453 TC5374254.2s Page 128 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 10625 N De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Habib KhayyatEntity Name: UST Tank OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 10625 N De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Habib KhayyatEntity Name: UST Tank OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 10625 N De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Habib KhayyatEntity Name: UST Property Owner NameAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: OwnerEntity Title: Habib KhayyatEntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIREntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Habib KhayyatEntity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR (Continued)U001602453 TC5374254.2s Page 129 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 08-10-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 07-02-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 07-02-2014Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: Evaluation: Underground Storage TankCERS Description: 10344274CERS ID: 109179Site ID: CERS TANKS: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: OAKLANDAffiliation City: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Regional Water Board - SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: 4089183400Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN JOSEAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: UST CASE WORKER - SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPEntity Name: Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description: T0608500155CERS ID: 251950Site ID: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR (Continued) U001602453 TC5374254.2s Page 130 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAAffiliation State: San JoseAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthEntity Name: CUPA DistrictAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 09-16-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 09-16-2015Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 08-24-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 08-24-2016Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: USTEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: Routine done by local agencyEval Type: NoViolations Found: 08-10-2017Eval Date: Compliance Evaluation InspectionEval General Type: CERSEval Source: HMRRPEval Program: Santa Clara County Fire DepartmentEval Division: Occupancy ID: 1958Eval Notes: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR (Continued)U001602453 TC5374254.2s Page 131 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OwnerEntity Title: Habib KhayyatEntity Name: Primary Emergency ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIREntity Name: Parent CorporationAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Habib KhayyatEntity Name: OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: 10625 N DE ANZA BLAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: KHAYYAT, HABIBEntity Name: Legal OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: Not reportedAffiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: 10625 N DE ANZA BLAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Mailing AddressEntity Name: Facility Mailing AddressAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 10625 N DE ANZA BLAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Habib KhayyatEntity Name: Environmental ContactAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 918-3400Affiliation Phone: 95112-2716Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR (Continued)U001602453 TC5374254.2s Page 132 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 10625 N De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Habib KhayyatEntity Name: UST Tank OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 10625 N De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Habib KhayyatEntity Name: UST Tank OperatorAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: 95014Affiliation Zip: United StatesAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CupertinoAffiliation City: 10625 N De Anza BlvdAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Habib KhayyatEntity Name: UST Property Owner NameAffiliation Type Desc: (408) 255-5772Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: Not reportedAffiliation State: Not reportedAffiliation City: Not reportedAffiliation Address: CUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR (Continued) U001602453 -122.031437Longitude: 37.333489Latitude: CAMPBELL,CUPERTINO,LOS GATOS,MORGAN HILLPermitting Agency: 32Facility ID: -122.03278Longitude: 37.33214Latitude: Santa Clara County Environmental HealthPermitting Agency: Not reportedFacility ID: UST: 1307 ft. Site 3 of 8 in cluster G 0.248 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 223 ft. 1/8-1/4 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 South 10625 N DE ANZA BL N/A G37 USTCUPERTINO SMOG & AUTO REPAIR U003948782 TC5374254.2s Page 133 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2001-06-27 00:00:00Closed Date: 1987-01-01 00:00:00Date Listed: SCVWDOversite Agency: 07S2W12P01SCVWD ID: 2Region Code: SANTA CLARARegion: HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: 3/12/1991Preliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Discovered: 07S2W12P01fCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 1307 ft. Site 4 of 8 in cluster G 0.248 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 223 ft. 1/8-1/4 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 South HIST LUST10625 N DE ANZA BLVD N/A G38 LUSTARCO #6111 S102424306 Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002CE2A.pdfURL: 0002CE2AFile Number: HIST UST: 1307 ft. Site 5 of 8 in cluster G 0.248 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 223 ft. 1/8-1/4 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 South HAZNET10625 N DEANZA BLVD N/A G39 HIST USTARCO PRODUCTS COMPANY S113029409 TC5374254.2s Page 134 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.27Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAL000161743TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: RCHO STA MARG, CA 926880000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 80249Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7146703958Telephone: WASTE SPECIALISTContact: CAL000021858GEPAID: 2004Year: S113029409envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.41Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAL000161743TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: RCHO STA MARG, CA 926880000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 80249Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7146703958Telephone: WASTE SPECIALISTContact: CAL000021858GEPAID: 2005Year: S113029409envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.41Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAL000161743TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: RCHO STA MARG, CA 926880000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 80249Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7146703958Telephone: WASTE SPECIALISTContact: CAL000021858GEPAID: 2005Year: S113029409envid: HAZNET: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: ARCO PRODUCTS COMPANY (Continued)S113029409 TC5374254.2s Page 135 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 33 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.12Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAL000161743TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: RCHO STA MARG, CA 926880000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 80249Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7146703958Telephone: WASTE SPECIALISTContact: CAL000021858GEPAID: 2003Year: S113029409envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.27Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAL000161743TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: RCHO STA MARG, CA 926880000Mailing City,St,Zip: PO BOX 80249Mailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7146703958Telephone: WASTE SPECIALISTContact: CAL000021858GEPAID: 2004Year: S113029409envid: ARCO PRODUCTS COMPANY (Continued) S113029409 CAD088844345EPA ID: 901648Site ID: 9Region: SEMS Archive Detail: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL: NFF: 6085FIPS Code: 12Cong District: CAD088844345EPA ID: 901648Site ID: SEMS Archive: 1334 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster H 0.253 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 228 ft. 1/4-1/2 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 SSW RCRA NonGen / NLR20650 VALLEY GREEN DR CAD088844345 H40 SEMS-ARCHIVETIMEX 1000225425 TC5374254.2s Page 136 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedContact email: 408-996-7822Contact telephone: USContact country: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 20650 VALLEY GREEN DRContact address: VICTORIA WELLSContact: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 20525 MARIANI AVEMailing address: CAD088844345EPA ID: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 20650 VALLEY GREEN DRFacility address: TIMEXFacility name: 01/03/1995Date form received by agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 1986-05-01 00:00:00Finish Date: 1986-05-01 00:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: DISCVRYAction Name: DSAction Code: 0OU: NFF: NNPL: TIMEXSite Name: CAD088844345EPA ID: 901648Site ID: 9Region: EPA PerfCurrent Action Lead: NQual: 1987-02-01 00:00:00Finish Date: Not reportedStart Date: 1SEQ: PAAction Name: PAAction Code: 0OU: NFF: NNPL: TIMEXSite Name: CAD088844345EPA ID: 901648Site ID: 9Region: EPA Perf In-HseCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 1987-02-01 00:00:00Finish Date: Not reportedStart Date: 1SEQ: ARCH SITEAction Name: VSAction Code: 0OU: NFF: NNPL: TIMEXSite Name: TIMEX (Continued)1000225425 TC5374254.2s Page 137 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 408-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: CUPERTINORED, CA 95014 20650 VALLEY GREEN DROwner/operator address: SOBRATO-BERG PROPERTIESOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: TIMEX (Continued)1000225425 TC5374254.2s Page 138 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Under InvestigationPotential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: 43-1927RB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: DIBCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.0348Longitude: 37.3322Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Lead Agency: T0608591755Global Id: 01/21/1987Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: CPS-SLIC: 1334 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster H 0.253 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 228 ft. 1/4-1/2 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 SSW 20650 VALLEY GREEN DR N/A H41 CPS-SLICTIMEX CORPORATION S103640881 OAKLANDAffiliation City: 1515 CLAY ST., STE. 1400Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: David Barr - SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Cleanup Program SiteCERS Description: T0608591755CERS ID: 236609Site ID: CERS TANKS: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Preliminary Site Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Site Assmnt Workplan Submitted: Not reportedDate Confirmed: TankLeak Source: Structure FailureLeak Cause: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: 43-1927Local Case #: 1/21/1987Date Closed: Case ClosedFacility Status: 43-1927Facility ID: 2Region: SLIC REG 2: 1334 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster H 0.253 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 228 ft. 1/4-1/2 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 SSW CERS20650 VALLEY GREEN DR N/A H42 CPS-SLICTIMEX CORPORATION S101542565 TC5374254.2s Page 139 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: TIMEX CORPORATION (Continued)S101542565 Not reportedNAICS Code(s): corrective action priority CA075ME - CA Prioritization, Facility or area was assigned a mediumAction: 19910827Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 9EPA Region: CAD990794158EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA029EPAction: 19910827Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 9EPA Region: CAD990794158EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: 19880729Original schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA049PAAction: 19910827Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 9EPA Region: CAD990794158EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA074MEAction: 19910827Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 9EPA Region: CAD990794158EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA029STAction: 19900101Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 9EPA Region: CAD990794158EPA ID: CORRACTS: 1393 ft.ECHOSite 6 of 8 in cluster G 0.264 mi.FINDS Relative: Higher Actual: 223 ft. 1/4-1/2 RCRA-SQGCUPERTINO, CA 95014 South RCRA-TSDF10700 N DE ANZA BLVD CAD990794158 G43 CORRACTSMOTOROLA FOUR PHASE INC 1000341814 TC5374254.2s Page 140 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Handler is engaged in the treatment, storage or disposal of hazardousDescription: TSDFClassification: Facility is not located on Indian land. Additional information is not known.Land type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 10700 N DE ANZA BLVD.Mailing address: CAD990794158EPA ID: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 10700 N DE ANZA BLVDFacility address: MOTOROLA FOUR PHASE INCFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-TSDF: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA050RF - RFA Completed, Assessment was an RFAAction: 20001130Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 9EPA Region: CAD990794158EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: 20001130Original schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA050 - RFA CompletedAction: 20001130Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 9EPA Region: CAD990794158EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: 20001130Original schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA070YE - RFA Determination Of Need For An RFI, RFI is NecessaryAction: 20001130Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 9EPA Region: CAD990794158EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: Not reportedNAICS Code(s): CA070NO - RFA Determination Of Need For An RFI, RFI is Not NecessaryAction: 20010730Actual Date: ENTIRE FACILITYArea Name: 9EPA Region: CAD990794158EPA ID: Not reportedSchedule end date: Not reportedOriginal schedule date: MOTOROLA FOUR PHASE INC (Continued) 1000341814 TC5374254.2s Page 141 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATIONEvent: 01/01/1990Event date: Corrective Action Summary: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: MOTOROLA FOUR PHASE INCSite name: 08/04/1980Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 408-446-0700Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 20700 NALLEY GREEN DRIVEOwner/operator address: SOBRATO DEVELOPMENT CO.Owner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 408-255-0900Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: CITY NOT REPORTED, CA 99999 10700 N DE ANZA BLVDOwner/operator address: MOTOROLA FOUR PHASE INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: waste MOTOROLA FOUR PHASE INC (Continued) 1000341814 TC5374254.2s Page 142 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 11/02/1987Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 06/17/1988 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 10/18/1988Date achieved compliance: 10/29/1987Date violation determined: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 01/29/1988 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 02/18/1988Date achieved compliance: 11/02/1987Date violation determined: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: NECESSARY DETERMINATION OF NEED FOR AN INVESTIGATION-INVESTIGATION IS NOTEvent: 07/30/2001Event date: RFA COMPLETED-ASSESSMENT WAS A RFAEvent: 11/30/2000Event date: RFA COMPLETEDEvent: 11/30/2000Event date: DETERMINATION OF NEED FOR AN INVESTIGATION-INVESTIGATION IS NECESSARYEvent: 11/30/2000Event date: CA PRIORITIZATION-MEDIUM CA PRIORITYEvent: 08/27/1991Event date: LEAD AGENCY DETERMINATIONEvent: 08/27/1991Event date: PA OR CERCLA INSPECTIONEvent: 08/27/1991Event date: NCAPS RANKING/PRIORITYEvent: 08/27/1991Event date: MOTOROLA FOUR PHASE INC (Continued) 1000341814 TC5374254.2s Page 143 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002903797DFR URL: 110002903797Registry ID: 1000341814Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002903797Registry ID: FINDS: StateEvaluation lead agency: 10/18/1988Date achieved compliance: TSD - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 10/29/1987Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 02/18/1988Date achieved compliance: TSD - Financial RequirementsArea of violation: FINANCIAL RECORD REVIEWEvaluation: MOTOROLA FOUR PHASE INC (Continued) 1000341814 DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: BLDG 1DSLContainer Num: 001Tank Num: 0002Total Tanks: CUPERTINO, CA 95014Owner City,St,Zip: 10700 N. DE ANZA BLVD.Owner Address: MOTOROLA FOUR-PHASE SYSTEMSOwner Name: 4082550900Telephone: ED KOCH, FACILITIES ENG.Contact Name: COMPUTER COMPANYOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000036517Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: 1393 ft. Site 7 of 8 in cluster G 0.264 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 223 ft. 1/4-1/2 CERSCUPERTINO, CA 95014 South HWP10700 N DE ANZA BLVD N/A G44 HIST USTFOUR-PHASE SYSTEMS INC U001601012 TC5374254.2s Page 144 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Closure Final - ISSUE CLOSURE VERIFICATIONEvent Description: CONTAIN1, TANKSTR1, TANKTRT1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD990794158EPA Id: 11/07/1984Actual Date: Closure Final - RECEIVE CLOSURE CERTIFICATIONEvent Description: CONTAIN1, TANKSTR1, TANKTRT1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD990794158EPA Id: Closure: 02/09/1981Actual Date: New Operating Permit - APPLICATION PART A RECEIVEDEvent Description: CONTAIN1, TANKSTR1, TANKTRT1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD990794158EPA Id: 11/07/1992Actual Date: New Operating Permit - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST ACKNOWLEDGEDEvent Description: CONTAIN1, TANKSTR1, TANKTRT1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD990794158EPA Id: 11/07/1984Actual Date: New Operating Permit - FINAL PERMIT - WITHDRAWAL REQUEST RECEIVEDEvent Description: CONTAIN1, TANKSTR1, TANKTRT1Unit Names: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: CAD990794158EPA Id: Activities: Not reportedPublic Information Officer: Not reportedPublic Information Officer: 15Senate District: 28Assembly District: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedTeam: Not reportedFacility Size: Historical - Non-OperatingFacility Type: -122.0325Longitude: 37.33214Latitude: UNDERGOING CLOSURECleanup Status: CAD990794158EPA Id: HWP: Groundwater Monitoring Well, 10Leak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: 1980Year Installed: BLDG5DSLContainer Num: 002Tank Num: Groundwater Monitoring Well, 10Leak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: FOUR-PHASE SYSTEMS INC (Continued) U001601012 TC5374254.2s Page 145 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 4084460700Affiliation Phone: 950140000Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: 20700 NALLEY GREEN DRIVEAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Sobrato Development Co.Entity Name: Facility OwnerAffiliation Type Desc: 4082550900Affiliation Phone: 950140000Affiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: CUPERTINOAffiliation City: 10700 N DE ANZA BLVDAffiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: NON-DELIVERABLE 4/94 FEE FORMEntity Name: Facility ContactAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Hazardous WasteCERS Description: CAD990794158CERS ID: 233673Site ID: CERS TANKS: 02/02/1987Actual Date: FOUR-PHASE SYSTEMS INC (Continued) U001601012 -122.0325Longitude: 37.33214Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 15Senate: 28Assembly: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Mark PirosSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: WMLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 40Acres: Corrective ActionSite Type Detailed: Corrective ActionSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 04/23/2013Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: 80001514Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 1393 ft. Site 8 of 8 in cluster G 0.264 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 223 ft. 1/4-1/2 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 South 10700 N DE ANZA BLVD N/A G45 ENVIROSTORFOUR-PHASE SYSTEMS INC S118757534 TC5374254.2s Page 146 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RCRA Facility Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/06/1992Completed Date: Technical ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/23/1991Completed Date: Technical ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/24/1989Completed Date: Technical ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/01/1983Completed Date: Technical ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/27/1991Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 80001514Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD990794158Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 31602110Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 31602109Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 31602108Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 31602107Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 31602106Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 31602105Alias Name: SVPotential Description: Trichloroethylene (TCE 1,1-Dichloroethylene Freon 113 Tetrachloroethylene (PCE 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCAConfirmed COC: Trichloroethylene (TCE 1,1-Dichloroethylene Freon 113 Tetrachloroethylene (PCE 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCAPotential COC: MANUFACTURING - ELECTRONICPast Use: 31602105, 31602106, 31602107, 31602108, 31602109, 31602110APN: FOUR-PHASE SYSTEMS INC (Continued) S118757534 TC5374254.2s Page 147 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Facility determined that no further action is required. RCRA Facility Assessment amendment for the former Motorola-Four PhaseComments: 07/30/2001Completed Date: RCRA Facility Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/30/2001Completed Date: RCRA Facility Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/30/2001Completed Date: Consent OrderCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/29/1986Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/30/2000Completed Date: FOUR-PHASE SYSTEMS INC (Continued) S118757534 USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: DEBRA E BECKMANContact: WEST SACRAMENTO, CA 95691 1584 ENTERPRISE BOULEVARDMailing address: CAD000099259EPA ID: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 20400 MARIANI AVENUEFacility address: DADE BEHRING INC.Facility name: 02/28/2008Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: CERS EMI 2135 ft.ECHO 0.404 mi.FINDS Relative: Higher Actual: 223 ft. 1/4-1/2 BROWNFIELDSCUPERTINO, CA 95014 SSE CPS-SLIC20400 MARIANI AVENUE CAD000099259 46 RCRA-LQGAPPLE INC 1000142172 TC5374254.2s Page 148 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/1997Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: DADE BEHRING INC.Owner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/1977Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 10500 BANDLEY DRIVEOwner/operator address: MISSION WEST PROPERTIESOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: DEBRA_BECKMAN@DADEBEHRING.COMContact email: 916-374-3221Contact telephone: APPLE INC (Continued)1000142172 TC5374254.2s Page 149 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation TRICHLOROETHYLENE. Waste name: D040. Waste code: PYRIDINE. Waste name: D038. Waste code: METHYL ETHYL KETONE. Waste name: D035. Waste code: CHLOROFORM. Waste name: D022. Waste code: CARBON TETRACHLORIDE. Waste name: D019. Waste code: BENZENE. Waste name: D018. Waste code: SELENIUM. Waste name: D010. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: APPLE INC (Continued)1000142172 TC5374254.2s Page 150 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation U115. Waste code: DIMETHYL SULFATE. Waste name: U103. Waste code: METHANE, DICHLORO-. Waste name: U080. Waste code: DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE. Waste name: U075. Waste code: CHLOROFORM. Waste name: U044. Waste code: SODIUM AZIDE. Waste name: P105. Waste code: 1,2-BENZENEDIOL, 4-[1-HYDROXY-2-(METHYLAMINO)ETHYL]-, (R)-. Waste name: P042. Waste code: CYANIDES (SOLUBLE CYANIDE SALTS), NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. Waste name: P030. Waste code: BENZENE, (CHLOROMETHYL)-. Waste name: P028. Waste code: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name: F005. Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,. Waste name: F002. Waste code: APPLE INC (Continued)1000142172 TC5374254.2s Page 151 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: DADE BEHRING INC. (FORMERLY SYVA CO.)Site name: 02/24/2004Date form received by agency: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: DADE BEHRING INC. (FORMERLY SYVA CO.)Site name: 02/24/2004Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: ETHANAMINE, N,N-DIETHYL- (OR) TRIETHYLAMINE. Waste name: U404. Waste code: CARBON TETRACHLORIDE. Waste name: U211. Waste code: 1-PROPANAMINE (I,T). Waste name: U194. Waste code: METHANOL (I). Waste name: U154. Waste code: METHANE, IODO-. Waste name: U138. Waste code: HYDROGEN SULFIDE. Waste name: U135. Waste code: ETHANE, 1,1’-OXYBIS-(I). Waste name: U117. Waste code: ETHYLENE OXIDE (I,T). Waste name: APPLE INC (Continued)1000142172 TC5374254.2s Page 152 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation P095. Waste code: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name: F005. Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,. Waste name: F002. Waste code: TRICHLOROETHYLENE. Waste name: D040. Waste code: PYRIDINE. Waste name: D038. Waste code: CHLOROFORM. Waste name: D022. Waste code: CARBON TETRACHLORIDE. Waste name: D019. Waste code: BENZENE. Waste name: D018. Waste code: SILVER. Waste name: D011. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: BARIUM. Waste name: D005. Waste code: APPLE INC (Continued)1000142172 TC5374254.2s Page 153 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PYRIDINE. Waste name: D038. Waste code: CHLOROFORM. Waste name: D022. Waste code: CARBON TETRACHLORIDE. Waste name: D019. Waste code: BENZENE. Waste name: D018. Waste code: SILVER. Waste name: D011. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: BARIUM. Waste name: D005. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: SYVA COMPANY, CUPERTINOSite name: 02/27/2002Date form received by agency: SODIUM AZIDE. Waste name: P105. Waste code: POTASSIUM CYANIDE. Waste name: P098. Waste code: CARBONIC DICHLORIDE. Waste name: APPLE INC (Continued)1000142172 TC5374254.2s Page 154 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: SYVA CO CUPERTINO SITESite name: 07/18/2000Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: SYVA COMPANY-CUPERTINOSite name: 10/12/2000Date form received by agency: CARBON TETRACHLORIDE. Waste name: U211. Waste code: PYRIDINE. Waste name: U196. Waste code: METHANE, DICHLORO-. Waste name: U080. Waste code: SODIUM AZIDE. Waste name: P105. Waste code: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name: F005. Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,. Waste name: F002. Waste code: TRICHLOROETHYLENE. Waste name: D040. Waste code: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE. Waste name: D039. Waste code: APPLE INC (Continued)1000142172 TC5374254.2s Page 155 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. F005, AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND OF THE ABOVE HALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE LISTED IN F001, F004, OR BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, ORTHO-DICHLOROBENZENE, TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE, AND CHLOROBENZENE, 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE, METHYLENE CHLORIDE, TRICHLOROETHYLENE, 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE,. Waste name: F002. Waste code: TRICHLOROETHYLENE. Waste name: D040. Waste code: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE. Waste name: D039. Waste code: CHLOROFORM. Waste name: D022. Waste code: CARBON TETRACHLORIDE. Waste name: D019. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: OF SUCH WASTE WOULD BY WASTE GUNPOWDER. DETONATION OR EXPLOSION WHEN EXPOSED TO HEAT OR A FLAME. ONE EXAMPLE WHEN EXPOSED TO WATER OR CORROSIVE MATERIALS, OR IF IT IS CAPABLE OF NORMALLY UNSTABLE, REACTS VIOLENTLY WITH WATER, GENERATES TOXIC GASES A MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED TO BE A REACTIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE IF IT IS. Waste name: D003. Waste code: DISPOSED, THE WASTE WOULD BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. THESE CAUSTIC OR ACID SOLUTIONS BECOME CONTAMINATED AND MUST BE USED BY MANY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN METAL PARTS PRIOR TO PAINTING. WHEN OR DEGREASE PARTS. HYDROCHLORIC ACID, A SOLUTION WITH A LOW PH, IS CAUSTIC SOLUTION WITH A HIGH PH, IS OFTEN USED BY INDUSTRIES TO CLEAN CONSIDERED TO BE A CORROSIVE HAZARDOUS WASTE. SODIUM HYDROXIDE, A A WASTE WHICH HAS A PH OF LESS THAN 2 OR GREATER THAN 12.5 IS. Waste name: D002. Waste code: WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OF. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Not Defined. Waste name: D000. Waste code: APPLE INC (Continued)1000142172 TC5374254.2s Page 156 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Enf. disposition status: 10/07/2003 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 12/02/2003Date achieved compliance: 10/07/2003Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: SYVA COMPANYSite name: 04/10/1990Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: SYVA COMPANYSite name: 02/28/1992Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: SYVA COMPANYSite name: 03/30/1994Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: BEHRING DIAGNOSTICS INC. - CUPERTINOSite name: 02/29/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: SYVA CO CUPERTINO SITESite name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: SYVA COMPANY - CUPERTINOSite name: 03/04/1999Date form received by agency: PHENOL. Waste name: U188. Waste code: METHANOL (I). Waste name: U154. Waste code: BENZO[A]PYRENE. Waste name: U022. Waste code: ACETONE (I). Waste name: U002. Waste code: SODIUM AZIDE. Waste name: P105. Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT APPLE INC (Continued)1000142172 TC5374254.2s Page 157 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPrimary Caseworker Email: CPrimary Caseworker Address: OAKLANDPrimary Caseworker Address: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Primary Caseworker Address: 510-622-3277Primary Caseworker Phone Number: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Primary Caseworker Organization Name: Regional Water BoardPrimary Caseworker Name: 01/01/2009Groundwater Migration Controlled Date: YESGroundwater Migration Controlled: 01/01/2009Human Health Exposure Controlled Date: INSUFFICIENT DATAHuman Health Exposure Controlled: MANUFACTURING - INDUSTRIAL MACHINERYPast Use(s) that Caused Contamination: Soil, Soil VaporMedia of Concern: Trichloroethylene (TCE), FreonContaminant(s) of Concern: Surface Discharge, UnknownRelease Type: 09/30/2010Last Correspondence Date: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Lead Agency: 09/30/2010Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: Cleanup Program SiteProject Type: -122.029699Longitude: 37.329152Latitude: SL0608533305Global ID: BROWNFIELDS: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Trichloroethylene (TCE), FreonPotential Contaminants of Concern: Soil, Soil VaporPotential Media Affected: Regional BoardFile Location: 43S1117RB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: UUUCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -122.029699Longitude: 37.329152Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Lead Agency: SL0608533305Global Id: 09/30/2010Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: CPS-SLIC: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: 12/02/2003Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 10/07/2003Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: APPLE INC (Continued)1000142172 TC5374254.2s Page 158 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1990Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 3841SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 3606Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 43County Code: 1987Year: EMI: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002411649DFR URL: 110002411649Registry ID: 1000142172Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access HAZARDOUS WASTE BIENNIAL REPORTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT MAJOR transported off-site. these facilities release directly to air, water, land, or that are from facilities on the amounts of over 300 listed toxic chemicals that US EPA TRIS (Toxics Release Inventory System) contains information Environmental Interest/Information System 110002411649Registry ID: STATE MASTER AIR EMISSIONS CLASSIFICATION UNKNOWN Environmental Interest/Information System 110058373941Registry ID: FINDS: APPLE INC (Continued)1000142172 TC5374254.2s Page 159 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 5047SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 3606Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 43County Code: 1997Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 5047SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 3606Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 43County Code: 1996Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 5047SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 3606Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 43County Code: 1995Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 3841SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 3606Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 43County Code: APPLE INC (Continued)1000142172 TC5374254.2s Page 160 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 5047SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 3606Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 43County Code: 2000Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 5047SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 3606Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 43County Code: 1999Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 5047SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 3606Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 43County Code: 1998Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: APPLE INC (Continued)1000142172 TC5374254.2s Page 161 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 43County Code: 2004Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2835SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 3606Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 43County Code: 2003Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2835SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 3606Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 43County Code: 2002Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 5047SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 3606Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 43County Code: 2001Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: APPLE INC (Continued)1000142172 TC5374254.2s Page 162 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Regional Water Board - SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Cleanup Program SiteCERS Description: SL0608533305CERS ID: 189127Site ID: CERS TANKS: .020496Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: .021Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: .007SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: .374NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: .054Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: .1454569Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: .353Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2835SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 3606Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 43County Code: 2006Year: .0244Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: .025Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: .008SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: .443NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: .064Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: .1599303Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: .39Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2835SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 3606Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 43County Code: 2005Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0.078Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0.195Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 2835SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 3606Facility ID: SFAir Basin: APPLE INC (Continued)1000142172 TC5374254.2s Page 163 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: OAKLANDAffiliation City: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: APPLE INC (Continued)1000142172 43-1456Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 43Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2188 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster I 0.414 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 231 ft. 1/4-1/2 SUNNYVALE, CA WNW 695 HOMESTEAD N/A I47 HIST CORTESETEXACO EXXON S104397053 Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608501427Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: Not reportedEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: Regional Water BoardContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608501427Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: All Files are on GeoTracker or in the Local Agency DatabaseFile Location: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: Not reportedRB Case Number: USTCase Worker: 01/23/1996Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -122.0394Longitude: 37.3374Latitude: T0608501427Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0608501427Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPLead Agency: LUST: 2328 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster I 0.441 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 231 ft. 1/4-1/2 CERSSUNNYVALE, CA 94087 WNW HIST UST695 W HOMESTEAD RD N/A I48 LUSTTEXACO/EXXON U001594953 TC5374254.2s Page 164 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0003Total Tanks: SAN ANTONIO, TX 78220Owner City,St,Zip: 3643 E. COMMERCEOwner Address: AUTOTRONIC SYSTEMS, INC.Owner Name: 5122232631Telephone: RANDY LEAVITTContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000020303Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002CE57.pdfURL: 0002CE57File Number: HIST UST: 01/23/1996Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608501427Global Id: 03/30/1992Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608501427Global Id: 11/12/1985Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608501427Global Id: LUST: Other Report / DocumentAction: 01/23/1996Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608501427Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 11/12/1985Date: OtherAction Type: T0608501427Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #39490Action: 04/10/1992Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608501427Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 01/23/1996Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608501427Global Id: LUST: 4089183400Phone Number: Not reportedEmail: SAN JOSECity: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Address: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: UST CASE WORKERContact Name: TEXACO/EXXON (Continued)U001594953 TC5374254.2s Page 165 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: OAKLANDAffiliation City: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Regional Water Board - SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: 4089183400Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN JOSEAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: UST CASE WORKER - SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPEntity Name: Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description: T0608501427CERS ID: 239304Site ID: CERS TANKS: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00009988Tank Capacity: 1977Year Installed: 080Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00015080Tank Capacity: 1977Year Installed: 079Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00009988Tank Capacity: 1977Year Installed: 078Container Num: 001Tank Num: TEXACO/EXXON (Continued)U001594953 TC5374254.2s Page 166 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1996-01-23 00:00:00Closed Date: 1986-01-01 00:00:00Date Listed: SCVWDOversite Agency: 07S2W12E01SCVWD ID: 2Region Code: SANTA CLARARegion: HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: 3/30/1992Preliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Discovered: 07S2W12E01fCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 2328 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster I 0.441 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 231 ft. 1/4-1/2 SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 WNW HIST LUST695 W HOMESTEAD RD N/A I49 LUSTTEXACO/EXXON S103881295 SUNITA AND RAMESH PANCHALOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 510-651-2515Contact telephone: USContact country: FREMONT, CA 94539 44184 IBERO WYContact address: SUNITA PANCHALContact: CAR000005298EPA ID: SUNNYVALE, CA 94089 695 W HOMESTEAD RDFacility address: SPEEDEE OIL CHANGE AND TUNE UPFacility name: 08/28/1995Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 2328 ft.HAZNETSite 4 of 4 in cluster I 0.441 mi.ECHO Relative: Higher Actual: 231 ft. 1/4-1/2 FINDSSUNNYVALE, CA 94087 WNW LUST695 W HOMESTEAD RD CAR000005298 I50 RCRA-SQGSPEEDEE OIL CHANGE & TUNE-UP 1001023171 TC5374254.2s Page 167 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation UORS (California - Used Oil Recycling System). California Integrated STATE MASTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110009552046Registry ID: FINDS: 07S2W12E01FEDR Link ID: 01/23/1996Date Closed: 07S2W12E01FSCVWD ID: SANTA CLARARegion: LUST SANTA CLARA: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 510-651-2515Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: FREMONT, CA 94539 44184 IBERO WYOwner/operator address: SPEEDEE OIL CHANGE & TUNE-UP (Continued) 1001023171 TC5374254.2s Page 168 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 695 W HOMESTEAD RDMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 4087301118Telephone: SUNITA RAMESH PANCHAL OWNERSContact: CAR000005298GEPAID: 2002Year: 1001023171envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.42Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CA0000084517TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SUNNYVALE, CA 940870000Mailing City,St,Zip: 695 W HOMESTEAD RDMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 4087301118Telephone: SUNITA RAMESH PANCHAL OWNERSContact: CAR000005298GEPAID: 2003Year: 1001023171envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.25Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CA0000084517TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SUNNYVALE, CA 940870000Mailing City,St,Zip: 695 W HOMESTEAD RDMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 4087301118Telephone: SUNITA RAMESH PANCHAL OWNERSContact: CAR000005298GEPAID: 2004Year: 1001023171envid: HAZNET: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110009552046DFR URL: 110009552046Registry ID: 1001023171Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access convenient collection opportunities for used oil and used oil filters. Waste Management Board (CIWMB) helps communities establish and promote SPEEDEE OIL CHANGE & TUNE-UP (Continued) 1001023171 TC5374254.2s Page 169 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 7 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 5.58Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Unspecified organic liquid mixtureWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD009452657TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SUNNYVALE, CA 940870000Mailing City,St,Zip: 695 W HOMESTEAD RDMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 4087301118Telephone: SUNITA RAMESH PANCHAL OWNERSContact: CAR000005298GEPAID: 2001Year: 1001023171envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 5.17Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Unspecified organic liquid mixtureWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD009452657TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SUNNYVALE, CA 940870000Mailing City,St,Zip: 695 W HOMESTEAD RDMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 4087301118Telephone: SUNITA RAMESH PANCHAL OWNERSContact: CAR000005298GEPAID: 2002Year: 1001023171envid: Santa ClaraFacility County: Not reportedMethod Decode: Not reportedCat Decode: 0.04Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CA0000084517TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: SUNNYVALE, CA 940870000Mailing City,St,Zip: SPEEDEE OIL CHANGE & TUNE-UP (Continued) 1001023171 TC5374254.2s Page 170 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Notice of Responsibility - #39496Action: 01/16/1986Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500480Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/16/1986Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608500480Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 01/24/1992Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500480Global Id: LUST: 4089183400Phone Number: Not reportedEmail: SAN JOSECity: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Address: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: UST CASE WORKERContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608500480Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: Not reportedEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: Regional Water BoardContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608500480Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: All Files are on GeoTracker or in the Local Agency DatabaseFile Location: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: Not reportedRB Case Number: USTCase Worker: 01/24/1992Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -122.033364772796Longitude: 37.3294063289724Latitude: T0608500480Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0608500480Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPLead Agency: LUST: 2362 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster J 0.447 mi.CERS Relative: Higher Actual: 233 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST CORTESECUPERTINO, CA 95014 South HIST LUST10431 N DE ANZA BLVD N/A J51 LUSTCUPERTINO NURSERY S102428538 TC5374254.2s Page 171 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1992-01-24 00:00:00Closed Date: 1987-01-01 00:00:00Date Listed: SCVWDOversite Agency: 07S2W13C01SCVWD ID: 2Region Code: SANTA CLARARegion: HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: 07S2W13C01FEDR Link ID: 01/24/1992Date Closed: 07S2W13C01FSCVWD ID: SANTA CLARARegion: LUST SANTA CLARA: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: 2/6/1990Preliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Discovered: 07S2W13C01fCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 01/24/1992Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608500480Global Id: 02/06/1990Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608500480Global Id: 01/16/1986Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608500480Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 09/15/1986Date: OtherAction Type: T0608500480Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 01/24/1992Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500480Global Id: CUPERTINO NURSERY (Continued)S102428538 TC5374254.2s Page 172 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: OAKLANDAffiliation City: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Regional Water Board - SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: 4089183400Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN JOSEAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: UST CASE WORKER - SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPEntity Name: Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description: T0608500480CERS ID: 211724Site ID: CERS TANKS: 43-0430Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 43Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: CUPERTINO NURSERY (Continued)S102428538 43-0079Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 43Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2374 ft. 0.450 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 227 ft. 1/4-1/2 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 SSE 10500 DE ANZA N/A 52 HIST CORTESEAPPLE COMPUTER INC S104396927 Preliminary site assessment underwayFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: CERS 2475 ft.ECHOSite 2 of 3 in cluster J 0.469 mi.FINDS Relative: Higher Actual: 233 ft. 1/4-1/2 RCRA NonGen / NLRCUPERTINO, CA 95014 South HIST LUST10500 N DE ANZA BLVD CAD981386485 J53 LUSTAPPLE COMPUTER 1000279123 TC5374254.2s Page 173 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 408-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 20450 STEVENS CREK BLVDOwner/operator address: APPLE COMPUTER INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 408-973-6959Contact telephone: USContact country: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 10500 N DE ANZA BLVDContact address: VICTORIA WELLSContact: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 20450 STEVENS CREEK BLVDMailing address: CAD981386485EPA ID: CUPERTINO, CA 95014 10500 N DE ANZA BLVDFacility address: APPLE COMPUTERFacility name: 12/06/1994Date form received by agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1991-01-17 00:00:00Closed Date: 1989-01-01 00:00:00Date Listed: SCVWDOversite Agency: 07S2W12Q01SCVWD ID: 2Region Code: SANTA CLARARegion: HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: 07S2W12Q01FEDR Link ID: 01/17/1991Date Closed: 07S2W12Q01FSCVWD ID: SANTA CLARARegion: LUST SANTA CLARA: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: 3/26/1991Preliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Discovered: 07S2W12Q01fCase Number: APPLE COMPUTER (Continued)1000279123 TC5374254.2s Page 174 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource AIR EMISSIONS CLASSIFICATION UNKNOWN Environmental Interest/Information System 110002689500Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: APPLE COMPUTER (Continued)1000279123 TC5374254.2s Page 175 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: OAKLANDAffiliation City: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Regional Water Board - SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: 4089183400Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN JOSEAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: UST CASE WORKER - SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPEntity Name: Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description: T0608500147CERS ID: 229338Site ID: CERS TANKS: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002689500DFR URL: 110002689500Registry ID: 1000279123Envid: ECHO: APPLE COMPUTER (Continued)1000279123 T0608500147Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: All Files are on GeoTracker or in the Local Agency DatabaseFile Location: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: Not reportedRB Case Number: USTCase Worker: 03/17/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -122.0314Longitude: 37.332125Latitude: T0608500147Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0608500147Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPLead Agency: LUST: 2475 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster J 0.469 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 233 ft. 1/4-1/2 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 South HIST UST10500 N DE ANZA BLVD N/A J54 LUSTFOUR-PHASE SYSTEMS U001600986 TC5374254.2s Page 176 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 03/17/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608500147Global Id: 01/26/1991Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608500147Global Id: 01/29/1988Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608500147Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 01/29/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0608500147Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #39495Action: 10/04/1989Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500147Global Id: Other WorkplanAction: 03/25/1988Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608500147Global Id: ExcavationAction: 01/26/1988Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608500147Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 01/17/1992Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608500147Global Id: LUST: 4089183400Phone Number: Not reportedEmail: SAN JOSECity: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Address: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: UST CASE WORKERContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608500147Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: Not reportedEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: Regional Water BoardContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: FOUR-PHASE SYSTEMS (Continued) U001600986 TC5374254.2s Page 177 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 3/8Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00001700Tank Capacity: 1983Year Installed: 2Container Num: 005Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 3/16Container Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00002000Tank Capacity: 1976Year Installed: 1Container Num: 004Tank Num: VisualLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00000500Tank Capacity: 1983Year Installed: 3Container Num: 003Tank Num: VisualLeak Detection: 3/8Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000200Tank Capacity: 1983Year Installed: 1Container Num: 002Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 3/16Container Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00002000Tank Capacity: 1981Year Installed: 2Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0005Total Tanks: CUPERTINO, CA 95014Owner City,St,Zip: 10500 N. DE ANZA BLVD.Owner Address: FOUR-PHASE SYSTEMSOwner Name: 4082550900Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: EMER. GENERATOROther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000006819Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: FOUR-PHASE SYSTEMS (Continued)U001600986 TC5374254.2s Page 178 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation VisualLeak Detection: FOUR-PHASE SYSTEMS (Continued) U001600986 RESPONSEAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: Staff Letter - #21258Action: 01/18/2001Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: Notice of Responsibility - #39487Action: 05/28/1991Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: LUST: 4089183400Phone Number: Not reportedEmail: SAN JOSECity: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Address: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: UST CASE WORKERContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608501263Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: Not reportedEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: Regional Water BoardContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608501263Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: All Files are on GeoTracker or in the Local Agency DatabaseFile Location: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: Not reportedRB Case Number: USTCase Worker: 10/22/2004Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -122.040679Longitude: 37.338442Latitude: T0608501263Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0608501263Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPLead Agency: LUST: 2576 ft.CERS 0.488 mi.HIST CORTESE Relative: Higher Actual: 234 ft. 1/4-1/2 EMISUNNYVALE, CA 94087 WNW HIST LUST1695 HOLLENBECK AVE N/A 55 LUSTSHELL OIL COMPANY S101309527 TC5374254.2s Page 179 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Other Report / DocumentAction: 09/15/1997Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: Verbal CommunicationAction: 08/17/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 08/01/1990Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 03/30/1994Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: ExcavationAction: 12/06/1989Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: Well Installation ReportAction: 02/01/1991Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: CorrespondenceAction: 01/21/1999Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: CAP/RAP - Feasibility Study ReportAction: 01/11/1991Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 05/05/1993Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: Tank Removal Report / UST Sampling ReportAction: 08/03/1990Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 11/16/1992Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: CorrespondenceAction: 09/22/2004Date: SHELL OIL COMPANY (Continued)S101309527 TC5374254.2s Page 180 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08/01/1989Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608501263Global Id: 10/06/1988Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0608501263Global Id: 10/08/1984Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608501263Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 10/08/1984Date: OtherAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 07/18/1989Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 03/12/2001Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: Interim Remedial Action ReportAction: 04/01/1999Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 04/01/1999Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 10/22/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 03/14/2001Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 06/03/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 08/03/1990Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608501263Global Id: SHELL OIL COMPANY (Continued)S101309527 TC5374254.2s Page 181 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers and Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: BAY AREA AQMDAir District Name: 1389SIC Code: BAAir District Name: 7458Facility ID: SFAir Basin: 43County Code: 1995Year: EMI: 2004-10-22 00:00:00Closed Date: 1985-01-01 00:00:00Date Listed: SCVWDOversite Agency: 07S2W11H01SCVWD ID: 2Region Code: SANTA CLARARegion: HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: 07S2W11H01FEDR Link ID: 10/22/2004Date Closed: 07S2W11H01FSCVWD ID: SANTA CLARARegion: LUST SANTA CLARA: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: 8/1/1989Pollution Characterization Began: 10/6/1988Preliminary Site Assesment Began: Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Discovered: 07S2W11H01fCase Number: Pollution CharacterizationFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 10/22/2004Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608501263Global Id: SHELL OIL COMPANY (Continued)S101309527 TC5374254.2s Page 182 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: OAKLANDAffiliation City: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Regional Water Board - SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: 4089183400Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: SAN JOSEAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: UST CASE WORKER - SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPEntity Name: Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description: T0608501263CERS ID: 228382Site ID: CERS TANKS: 43-1285Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 43Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: SHELL OIL COMPANY (Continued)S101309527 Not reportedSpecial Program: 15Senate: 28Assembly: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Referred - Not AssignedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 1Acres: EvaluationSite Type Detailed: EvaluationSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 06/06/2009Status Date: Refer: 1248 Local AgencyStatus: 60001047Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: CERS 4769 ft.HIST CORTESE 0.903 mi.SWEEPS UST Relative: Higher Actual: 262 ft. 1/2-1 HIST LUSTCUPERTINO, CA 95014 SSW LUST20955 STEVENS CREEK BLVD N/A 56 ENVIROSTORDAVIDSON CHEVROLET/GEO INC.S103950146 TC5374254.2s Page 183 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPhone Number: Not reportedEmail: OAKLANDCity: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Address: SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Organization Name: Regional Water BoardContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0608502120Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / LubricatingPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedLocal Case Number: All Files are on GeoTracker or in the Local Agency DatabaseFile Location: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: Not reportedRB Case Number: USTCase Worker: 07/30/1998Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -122.040134Longitude: 37.323613Latitude: T0608502120Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0608502120Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPLead Agency: LUST: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/29/2006Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60001047Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -122.0399Longitude: 37.32349Latitude: Not ApplicableFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: DAVIDSON CHEVROLET/GEO INC. (Continued)S103950146 TC5374254.2s Page 184 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPrelim. Site Assesment Wokplan Submitted: LUSTOversight Program: Not reportedDate Leak Confirmed: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Discovered: 07S2W13E03fCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Not reportedFacility Id: 2Region: LUST REG 2: 07/30/1998Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0608502120Global Id: 05/08/1998Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0608502120Global Id: LUST: Other Report / DocumentAction: 07/30/1998Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608502120Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 05/05/1998Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608502120Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 07/31/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0608502120Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 05/08/1998Date: OtherAction Type: T0608502120Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 07/30/1998Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0608502120Global Id: LUST: 4089183400Phone Number: Not reportedEmail: SAN JOSECity: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Address: SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: UST CASE WORKERContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0608502120Global Id: DAVIDSON CHEVROLET/GEO INC. (Continued) S103950146 TC5374254.2s Page 185 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SAN JOSEAffiliation City: 1555 Berger Drive, Suite 300Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: UST CASE WORKER - SANTA CLARA COUNTY LOPEntity Name: Local Agency CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: Affiliation: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup SiteCERS Description: T0608502120CERS ID: 200677Site ID: CERS TANKS: 43-2307Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 43Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1Number Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WSTG: OILTank Use: 02-10-92Active Date: 500Capacity: ATank Status: 43-012-016252-000001SWRCB Tank Id: UNKNOWNOwner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 02-10-92Action Date: 02-10-92Referral Date: 44-026414Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 16252Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 1998-07-30 00:00:00Closed Date: 1998-09-02 00:00:00Date Listed: SCVWDOversite Agency: 07S2W13E03SCVWD ID: 2Region Code: SANTA CLARARegion: HIST LUST SANTA CLARA: 07S2W13E03FEDR Link ID: 07/30/1998Date Closed: 07S2W13E03FSCVWD ID: SANTA CLARARegion: LUST SANTA CLARA: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring Began: Not reportedDate Remediation Action Underway: Not reportedPollution Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedPollution Characterization Began: Not reportedPreliminary Site Assesment Began: DAVIDSON CHEVROLET/GEO INC. (Continued) S103950146 TC5374254.2s Page 186 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAffiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: OAKLANDAffiliation City: 1515 CLAY ST SUITE 1400Affiliation Address: Not reportedEntity Title: Regional Water Board - SAN FRANCISCO BAY RWQCB (REGION 2)Entity Name: Regional Board CaseworkerAffiliation Type Desc: 4089183400Affiliation Phone: Not reportedAffiliation Zip: Not reportedAffiliation Country: CAAffiliation State: DAVIDSON CHEVROLET/GEO INC. (Continued) S103950146 APNAlias Type: 316-05-052Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 316-05-051Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 316-05-050Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: Cupertino Village Shopping CenterAlias Name: SOIL, SVPotential Description: Tetrachloroethylene (PCEConfirmed COC: Tetrachloroethylene (PCEPotential COC: DRY CLEANINGPast Use: 316-05-072, 316-45-017 316-05-050, 316-05-051, 316-05-052, 316-05-053, 316-05-056,APN: -122.0153Longitude: 37.33610Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: CLRRA Liability Immunity (AB 389)Special Program: 15Senate: 28Assembly: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Mark PirosSupervisor: Moises CarvalhoProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 12.51Acres: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detailed: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 201671Site Code: 03/01/2007Status Date: ActiveStatus: 60000385Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 4952 ft. 0.938 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 173 ft. 1/2-1 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 East VCP10989 NORTH WOLFE ROAD N/A 57 ENVIROSTORCUPERTINO VILLAGE CLEANERS S108054446 TC5374254.2s Page 187 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: the Site. contamination at the Site may have on the proposed redevelopment of the Response Action at the Site as well as the potential impact Community representatives inquired about the status and schedule ofComments: 08/14/2013Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: $36,657. Estimated fiscal year 2012-2013 annual DTSC oversight costs areComments: 10/15/2012Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: the fence line. and locations of the soil vapor samples planned to be collected along Letter sent to adjacent property notifying them of the date, time,Comments: 02/22/2008Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: proposed remedy due to potential new future land uses. Revised Response Plan submitted requested due to need to re-evaluateComments: 05/07/2013Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: $24,079. The estimated annual oversight cost for the 2013/14 fiscal year isComments: 10/02/2013Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60000385Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 201671Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110021144260Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110002732598Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 316-45-017Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 316-05-072Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 316-05-056Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 316-05-053Alias Name: CUPERTINO VILLAGE CLEANERS (Continued) S108054446 TC5374254.2s Page 188 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Site Characterization ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Agreement. host jurisdiction must be notified DTSC is negotiating a CLRRA As part of the AB 389 Process the appropriate agencies, including theComments: 12/05/2006Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: appropriate lead agency for the Cupertino Village Cleaners Project. Under the criteria of the Cal/EPA MOA, DTSC was determined theComments: 08/15/2006Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Cupertino Village REW FY 14/15Comments: 09/24/2014Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/24/2014Completed Date: CEQA - Notice of ExemptionCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Soil Vapor Extraction Status Report. fiscal year 2016/2017. The anticipated project activities include the DTSC letter with oversight cost estimate for project activities forComments: 09/22/2016Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: data in the area where it is needed. response that proposed new locations would not provide soil vapor potential disruptions to the 99 Ranch Market business and DTSC Request to change the locations of two soil vapor probes due toComments: 05/02/2013Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate completed.Comments: 11/16/2011Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/22/2015Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: CUPERTINO VILLAGE CLEANERS (Continued) S108054446 TC5374254.2s Page 189 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation September 30, 2008. Work Plan approved. Supplemental soil sampling is scheduled forComments: 09/15/2008Completed Date: Site Characterization WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: will be required to remediate the contamination. environment at the Site and PCE is migrating offsite. Further action presents an elevated risk to human health and safety and the Site Assessment Report indicates that PCE vapor plume at the SiteComments: 01/28/2011Completed Date: Remedial Investigation ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: February 2008 round of fieldwork completed.Comments: 02/29/2008Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/17/2008Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DTSC as existing information. Report was completed before DTSC involvement. Report submitted toComments: 01/05/2006Completed Date: Remedial Investigation ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Community Profile completed.Comments: 10/03/2008Completed Date: Community ProfileCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: contamination at the Site. groundwater sampling will be conducted to further characterize Investigation Workplan approved. Supplemental soil, soil vapor, andComments: 12/24/2007Completed Date: Site Characterization WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Project is eligible for the AB 389 ProcessComments: 10/31/2006Completed Date: ApplicationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/15/2006Completed Date: CUPERTINO VILLAGE CLEANERS (Continued) S108054446 TC5374254.2s Page 190 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Pilot/Treatability Study ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: SVE Pilot Work Plan approved.Comments: 09/23/2011Completed Date: Pilot Study/Treatability WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/03/2011Completed Date: Fact SheetsCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: achieved. where the residential or unrestricted use cleanup goals are not Covenant will be put in place to restrict any portion of the Site soil vapor will be reduced to the extent practicable. A Land Use tetrachloroethylene in subsurface and sub-slab soil vapor. PCE in Plan established both residential and commercial cleanup goals for Site. The system was installed as part of a pilot test. The Response operation of the existing soil vapor extraction system that is on the The response action selected in the Response Plan is continuedComments: 02/24/2014Completed Date: AB 389 Response PlanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Work Notice completed and will be mailed out on July 15, 2009.Comments: 07/09/2009Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Soil Vapor Sampling Work Plan approved.Comments: 06/03/2009Completed Date: Remedial Investigation WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Supplemental Soil Sampling scheduled for September 30, 2008.Comments: 09/15/2008Completed Date: Work NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: extraction. Site, which is the continued operation of the pilot test soil vapor 2014. The fact also describes the proposed response action for the Response Plan, which runs from January 6, 2014 through February 5, The fact sheet announces the public comment period for the DraftComments: 12/26/2013Completed Date: Fact SheetsCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: CUPERTINO VILLAGE CLEANERS (Continued) S108054446 TC5374254.2s Page 191 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/03/2015Completed Date: Monitoring ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: next sampling event. restarted if an increasing concentration trend is observed during the rebound testing is to continue. The SVE system may need to be concentrations indicated that equilibrium has not been reached and site-specific commercial cleanup goals. The increasing VOC Site, but soil gas concentrations continued to be below the increasing concentration trend for tetrachloroethylene across the contamination. The rebound test sampling results showed a generally remediated the subsurface volatile organic compound (VOC) extraction (SVE) system from November 2011 to March 2014 effectively implemented to determine if the operation of the soil vapor The Report summarizes the interim results of rebound testing beingComments: 09/22/2014Completed Date: Monitoring ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Response Plan. for the Site and directed that it be the remedy proposed in a Draft approval letter that soil vapor extraction is a feasible technology conclusions of the pilot testing program . DTSC agreed in its describes the pilot testing procedures, and presents the results and design and installation, describes the startup monitoring results, (SVE) System Pilot Test Work Plan, and describes the SVE system The report documents the implementation of the Soil Vapor ExtractionComments: 03/03/2014Completed Date: Pilot/Treatability Study ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Courier on January 3, 2014. for the Site. The public notice is scheduled to run in the Cupertino pilot test soil vapor extraction system as the final response action 2014. The Draft Response Plan proposes the continued operation of the Response Plan, which runs from January 6, 2014 through February 5, The public notice announces the public comment period for the DraftComments: 12/26/2013Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/12/2013Completed Date: Well Installation WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/07/2012Completed Date: CUPERTINO VILLAGE CLEANERS (Continued) S108054446 TC5374254.2s Page 192 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 28Assembly: 201671Site Code: Cleanup BerkeleyDivision Branch: Mark PirosSupervisor: Moises CarvalhoProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 12.51Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detail: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 60000385Facility ID: VCP: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: 2018Future Due Date: Removal Action Completion ReportFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: 2019Future Due Date: CertificationFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: for the Site. agencies of the February 24,2014 approval of the Final Response Plan DTSC notified the host jurisdiction and other interested local Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code section 25395.96(c)(2),Comments: 03/10/2014Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DTSC entered into a CLRRA agreementComments: 03/01/2007Completed Date: California Land Reuse and Revitalization AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: gas sampling at 1, 2, and 3 month intervals. operation, the system will be shut down for rebound testing with soil monitor will occur monthly. Following 3 months of SVE system of results. The SVE system will operate for three months and system monitoring of the SVE system; and the rebound testing and reporting reconnect and restart the SVE system; the operation, maintenance, and after rebound testing. The Work Plan describes the procedures to system due to high concentrations of tetrachloroethylene in soil gas Cupertino Village LP plans to restart the soil vapor extraction (SVE)Comments: 04/26/2016Completed Date: Remedial Action Implementation WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: CUPERTINO VILLAGE CLEANERS (Continued) S108054446 TC5374254.2s Page 193 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Letter sent to adjacent property notifying them of the date, time,Comments: 02/22/2008Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: proposed remedy due to potential new future land uses. Revised Response Plan submitted requested due to need to re-evaluateComments: 05/07/2013Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: $24,079. The estimated annual oversight cost for the 2013/14 fiscal year isComments: 10/02/2013Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60000385Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 201671Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110021144260Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110002732598Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 316-45-017Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 316-05-072Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 316-05-056Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 316-05-053Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 316-05-052Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 316-05-051Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 316-05-050Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: Cupertino Village Shopping CenterAlias Name: SOIL, SVPotential Description: 30022Confirmed COC: 30022Potential COC: DRY CLEANINGPast Use: 316-05-072, 316-45-017 316-05-050, 316-05-051, 316-05-052, 316-05-053, 316-05-056,APN: 37.33610 / -122.0153Lat/Long: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 03/01/2007Status Date: ActiveStatus: CLRRA Liability Immunity (AB 389)Special Programs Code: 15Senate: CUPERTINO VILLAGE CLEANERS (Continued)S108054446 TC5374254.2s Page 194 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/24/2014Completed Date: CEQA - Notice of ExemptionCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Soil Vapor Extraction Status Report. fiscal year 2016/2017. The anticipated project activities include the DTSC letter with oversight cost estimate for project activities forComments: 09/22/2016Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: data in the area where it is needed. response that proposed new locations would not provide soil vapor potential disruptions to the 99 Ranch Market business and DTSC Request to change the locations of two soil vapor probes due toComments: 05/02/2013Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Annual Oversight Cost Estimate completed.Comments: 11/16/2011Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/22/2015Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: the Site. contamination at the Site may have on the proposed redevelopment of the Response Action at the Site as well as the potential impact Community representatives inquired about the status and schedule ofComments: 08/14/2013Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: $36,657. Estimated fiscal year 2012-2013 annual DTSC oversight costs areComments: 10/15/2012Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: the fence line. and locations of the soil vapor samples planned to be collected along CUPERTINO VILLAGE CLEANERS (Continued) S108054446 TC5374254.2s Page 195 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedComments: 01/17/2008Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DTSC as existing information. Report was completed before DTSC involvement. Report submitted toComments: 01/05/2006Completed Date: Remedial Investigation ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Community Profile completed.Comments: 10/03/2008Completed Date: Community ProfileCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: contamination at the Site. groundwater sampling will be conducted to further characterize Investigation Workplan approved. Supplemental soil, soil vapor, andComments: 12/24/2007Completed Date: Site Characterization WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Project is eligible for the AB 389 ProcessComments: 10/31/2006Completed Date: ApplicationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/15/2006Completed Date: Site Characterization ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Agreement. host jurisdiction must be notified DTSC is negotiating a CLRRA As part of the AB 389 Process the appropriate agencies, including theComments: 12/05/2006Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: appropriate lead agency for the Cupertino Village Cleaners Project. Under the criteria of the Cal/EPA MOA, DTSC was determined theComments: 08/15/2006Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Cupertino Village REW FY 14/15Comments: 09/24/2014Completed Date: CUPERTINO VILLAGE CLEANERS (Continued) S108054446 TC5374254.2s Page 196 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Site. The system was installed as part of a pilot test. The Response operation of the existing soil vapor extraction system that is on the The response action selected in the Response Plan is continuedComments: 02/24/2014Completed Date: AB 389 Response PlanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Work Notice completed and will be mailed out on July 15, 2009.Comments: 07/09/2009Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Soil Vapor Sampling Work Plan approved.Comments: 06/03/2009Completed Date: Remedial Investigation WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Supplemental Soil Sampling scheduled for September 30, 2008.Comments: 09/15/2008Completed Date: Work NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: extraction. Site, which is the continued operation of the pilot test soil vapor 2014. The fact also describes the proposed response action for the Response Plan, which runs from January 6, 2014 through February 5, The fact sheet announces the public comment period for the DraftComments: 12/26/2013Completed Date: Fact SheetsCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: September 30, 2008. Work Plan approved. Supplemental soil sampling is scheduled forComments: 09/15/2008Completed Date: Site Characterization WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: will be required to remediate the contamination. environment at the Site and PCE is migrating offsite. Further action presents an elevated risk to human health and safety and the Site Assessment Report indicates that PCE vapor plume at the SiteComments: 01/28/2011Completed Date: Remedial Investigation ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: February 2008 round of fieldwork completed.Comments: 02/29/2008Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: CUPERTINO VILLAGE CLEANERS (Continued) S108054446 TC5374254.2s Page 197 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Response Plan. for the Site and directed that it be the remedy proposed in a Draft approval letter that soil vapor extraction is a feasible technology conclusions of the pilot testing program . DTSC agreed in its describes the pilot testing procedures, and presents the results and design and installation, describes the startup monitoring results, (SVE) System Pilot Test Work Plan, and describes the SVE system The report documents the implementation of the Soil Vapor ExtractionComments: 03/03/2014Completed Date: Pilot/Treatability Study ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Courier on January 3, 2014. for the Site. The public notice is scheduled to run in the Cupertino pilot test soil vapor extraction system as the final response action 2014. The Draft Response Plan proposes the continued operation of the Response Plan, which runs from January 6, 2014 through February 5, The public notice announces the public comment period for the DraftComments: 12/26/2013Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/12/2013Completed Date: Well Installation WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/07/2012Completed Date: Pilot/Treatability Study ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: SVE Pilot Work Plan approved.Comments: 09/23/2011Completed Date: Pilot Study/Treatability WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/03/2011Completed Date: Fact SheetsCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: achieved. where the residential or unrestricted use cleanup goals are not Covenant will be put in place to restrict any portion of the Site soil vapor will be reduced to the extent practicable. A Land Use tetrachloroethylene in subsurface and sub-slab soil vapor. PCE in Plan established both residential and commercial cleanup goals for CUPERTINO VILLAGE CLEANERS (Continued) S108054446 TC5374254.2s Page 198 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Removal Action Completion ReportFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: 2019Future Due Date: CertificationFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: for the Site. agencies of the February 24,2014 approval of the Final Response Plan DTSC notified the host jurisdiction and other interested local Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code section 25395.96(c)(2),Comments: 03/10/2014Completed Date: CorrespondenceCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DTSC entered into a CLRRA agreementComments: 03/01/2007Completed Date: California Land Reuse and Revitalization AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: gas sampling at 1, 2, and 3 month intervals. operation, the system will be shut down for rebound testing with soil monitor will occur monthly. Following 3 months of SVE system of results. The SVE system will operate for three months and system monitoring of the SVE system; and the rebound testing and reporting reconnect and restart the SVE system; the operation, maintenance, and after rebound testing. The Work Plan describes the procedures to system due to high concentrations of tetrachloroethylene in soil gas Cupertino Village LP plans to restart the soil vapor extraction (SVE)Comments: 04/26/2016Completed Date: Remedial Action Implementation WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/03/2015Completed Date: Monitoring ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: next sampling event. restarted if an increasing concentration trend is observed during the rebound testing is to continue. The SVE system may need to be concentrations indicated that equilibrium has not been reached and site-specific commercial cleanup goals. The increasing VOC Site, but soil gas concentrations continued to be below the increasing concentration trend for tetrachloroethylene across the contamination. The rebound test sampling results showed a generally remediated the subsurface volatile organic compound (VOC) extraction (SVE) system from November 2011 to March 2014 effectively implemented to determine if the operation of the soil vapor The Report summarizes the interim results of rebound testing beingComments: 09/22/2014Completed Date: Monitoring ReportCompleted Document Type: CUPERTINO VILLAGE CLEANERS (Continued) S108054446 TC5374254.2s Page 199 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: 2018Future Due Date: CUPERTINO VILLAGE CLEANERS (Continued) S108054446 TC5374254.2s Page 200 ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 2 records.CUPERTINO U001600987FRANCISCO A SERRANO10550 DE ANZA BLVD95014LUST, HIST LUST, HIST USTCUPERTINO S122356377UNOCAL #542810490 DE ANZA BLVD95014LUSTTC5374254.2s Page 201 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5374254.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 11/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC5374254.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5374254.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 05/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5374254.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 03/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 04/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 04/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 05/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: 916-341-6320 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists TC5374254.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760-776-8943 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST: Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER) Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: see region list Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-637-5595 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 909-782-4496 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Telephone: 760-241-7365 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 530-542-5572 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. TC5374254.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-4834 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6710 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-542-4786 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-622-2433 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-570-3769 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 04/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 04/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5374254.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 04/24/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 05/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 04/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CPS-SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER) Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5374254.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-3291 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC5374254.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Telephone: 530-542-5574 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: 760-346-7491 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 951-782-3298 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 05/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 136 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST CLOSURE: Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive Director have been posted for a 60-day public comment period. UST Case Closures being proposed for consideration by the State Water Resources Control Board. These are primarily UST cases that meet closure criteria under the decisional framework in State Water Board Resolution No. 92-49 and other Board orders. UST Case Closures proposed for consideration by the Executive Director pursuant to State Water Board Resolution No. 2012-0061. These are cases that meet the criteria of the Low-Threat UST Case Closure Policy. UST Case Closure Review Denials and Approved Orders. TC5374254.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-327-7844 Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: SWRCB Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MILITARY UST SITES: Military UST Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military ust sites Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-327-5092 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5374254.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/24/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 04/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 05/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. TC5374254.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-323-7905 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 03/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. TC5374254.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4448 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 05/29/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6422 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5374254.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 04/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/18/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-6504 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. TC5374254.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CERS HAZ WASTE: CERS HAZ WASTE List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Hazardous Chemical Management, Hazardous Waste Onsite Treatment, Household Hazardous Waste Collection, Hazardous Waste Generator, and RCRA LQ HW Generator programs. Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: CalEPA Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version: 03/28/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2018 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 707-463-4466 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO AST: Aboveground Storage Tank Site Listing Aboveground storage tank sites Date of Government Version: 04/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: San Francisco County Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. TC5374254.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CERS TANKS: California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) Tanks List of sites in the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) Regulated Site Portal which fall under the Aboveground Petroleum Storage and Underground Storage Tank regulatory programs. Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Local Land Records LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEED: Deed Restriction Listing Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: DTSC and SWRCB Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports TC5374254.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 04/06/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 Last EDR Contact: 04/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Land Disposal sites (Landfills) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Military sites (consisting of: Military UST sites; Military Privatized sites; and Military Cleanup sites [formerly known as DoD non UST]) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. TC5374254.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 05/15/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5374254.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 05/08/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 198 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 2 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5374254.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 11/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 126 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5374254.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5374254.2s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. TC5374254.2s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2017 Number of Days to Update: 218 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Biennially INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 546 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 12/23/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 05/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust TC5374254.2s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 05/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5374254.2s Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Date of Government Version: 03/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Department of Interior Telephone: 202-208-2609 Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 02/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 02/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version: 01/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version: 09/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 703-704-1564 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. TC5374254.2s Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). Date of Government Version: 03/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO: CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 04/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: San Francisco County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON: CUPA Facility Listing list of facilities associated with the various CUPA programs in Livermore-Pleasanton Date of Government Version: 04/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department Telephone: 925-454-2361 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN AVAQMD: DRYCLEAN AVAQMD A listing of dry cleaners in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version: 03/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Telephone: 661-723-8070 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. TC5374254.2s Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-327-4498 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST: DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST A listing of dry cleaners in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Date of Government Version: 03/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District Telephone: 909-396-3211 Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 147 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version: 04/18/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/06/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version: 04/18/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-3628 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 05/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/15/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6066 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This database begins with calendar year 1993. TC5374254.2s Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-255-1136 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICE: ICE Contains data pertaining to the Permitted Facilities with Inspections / Enforcements sites tracked in Envirostor. Date of Government Version: 05/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Department of Toxic Subsances Control Telephone: 877-786-9427 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 05/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-440-7145 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MINES: Mines Site Location Listing A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-322-1080 Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. TC5374254.2s Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 05/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-558-1784 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. Date of Government Version: 05/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. The DPR issues licenses and/or certificates to: Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides; Pest control dealers and brokers; Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation Telephone: 916-445-4038 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-3846 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UIC: UIC Listing A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database. Date of Government Version: 04/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Telephone: 916-445-2408 Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical-laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites. The water boards review found that more than one-third of the region’s active disposal pits are operating without permission. TC5374254.2s Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: RWQCB, Central Valley Region Telephone: 559-445-5577 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5227 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: 213-576-6726 Last EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROD WATER PONDS: Produced Water Ponds Sites (GEOTRACKER) Produced water ponds sites Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROJECT: Project Sites (GEOTRACKER) Projects sites Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies NON-CASE INFO: Non-Case Information Sites (GEOTRACKER) Non-Case Information sites Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies WELL STIM PROJ: Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) Includes areas of groundwater monitoring plans, a depiction of the monitoring network, and the facilities, boundaries, and subsurface characteristics of the oilfield and the features (oil and gas wells, produced water ponds, UIC wells, water supply wells, etc?) being monitored Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5374254.2s Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CIWQS: California Integrated Water Quality System The California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) is a computer system used by the State and Regional Water Quality Control Boards to track information about places of environmental interest, manage permits and other orders, track inspections, and manage violations and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-794-4977 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER OIL GAS: Other Oil & Gas Projects Sites (GEOTRACKER) Other Oil & Gas Projects sites Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAMPLING POINT: Sampling Point ? Public Sites (GEOTRACKER) Sampling point - public sites Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UIC GEO: Underground Injection Control Sites (GEOTRACKER) Underground control injection sites Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resource Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CERS: CalEPA Regulated Site Portal Data The CalEPA Regulated Site Portal database combines data about environmentally regulated sites and facilities in California into a single database. It combines data from a variety of state and federal databases, and provides an overview of regulated activities across the spectrum of environmental programs for any given location in California. These activities include hazardous materials and waste, state and federal cleanups, impacted ground and surface waters, and toxic materials Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-323-2514 Last EDR Contact: 07/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MILITARY PRIV SITES: Military Privatized Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military privatized sites Date of Government Version: 06/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5374254.2s Page GR-32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California. TC5374254.2s Page GR-33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 196 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 04/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 04/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2047 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AMADOR COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List Date of Government Version: 03/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Amador County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-223-6439 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies BUTTE COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facility list. TC5374254.2s Page GR-34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 106 Source: Public Health Department Telephone: 530-538-7149 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CALVERAS COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa Facility Listing Date of Government Version: 05/07/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Calveras County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-754-6399 Last EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COLUSA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 05/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Health & Human Services Telephone: 530-458-0396 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 05/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925-646-2286 Last EDR Contact: 04/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEL NORTE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 04/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 707-465-0426 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies EL DORADO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. TC5374254.2s Page GR-35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: 559-445-3271 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually GLENN COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 830-934-6500 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies HUMBOLDT COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 03/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually IMPERIAL COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: San Diego Border Field Office Telephone: 760-339-2777 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INYO COUNTY: TC5374254.2s Page GR-36 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 760-878-0238 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies KERN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. Date of Government Version: 05/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly KINGS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 06/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Kings County Department of Public Health Telephone: 559-584-1411 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LAKE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 05/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Lake County Environmental Health Telephone: 707-263-1164 Last EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LASSEN COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Lassen County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-251-8528 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES COUNTY: TC5374254.2s Page GR-37 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3178 Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Last EDR Contact: 07/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version: 04/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890-7806 Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department Telephone: 310-524-2236 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562-570-2563 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5374254.2s Page GR-38 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 01/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Last EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MADERA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 02/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Madera County Environmental Health Telephone: 559-675-7823 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MARIN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-473-6647 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MERCED COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 05/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Merced County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-381-1094 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA Facility List Date of Government Version: 05/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Mono County Health Department Telephone: 760-932-5580 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONTEREY COUNTY: TC5374254.2s Page GR-39 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division. Date of Government Version: 06/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Monterey County Health Department Telephone: 831-796-1297 Last EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies NAPA COUNTY: Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 05/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NEVADA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/24/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Community Development Agency Telephone: 530-265-1467 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ORANGE COUNTY: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non-petroleum spills. Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5374254.2s Page GR-40 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 04/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 05/08/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PLACER COUNTY: Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-745-2363 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PLUMAS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Plumas County CUPA Program facilities. Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Plumas County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-283-6355 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 04/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 06/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 04/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 06/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: Toxic Site Clean-Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. TC5374254.2s Page GR-41 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 07/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 02/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 07/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BENITO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 05/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: San Benito County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041 Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment ’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 06/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619-338-2268 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5374254.2s Page GR-42 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 04/18/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 619-338-2209 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Oversight Program Listing A listing of all LOP release sites that are or were under the County of San Diego’s jurisdiction. Included are closed or transferred cases, open cases, and cases that did not have a case type indicated. The cases without a case type are mostly complaints; however, some of them could be LOP cases. Date of Government Version: 04/18/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 858-505-6874 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/10/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/01/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: TC5374254.2s Page GR-43 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 05/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN MATEO COUNTY: Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 03/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division. Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-686-8167 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SANTA CLARA COUNTY: Cupa Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 05/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-1973 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5374254.2s Page GR-44 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-3417 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 05/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-535-7694 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Telephone: 831-464-2761 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SHASTA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SOLANO COUNTY: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: TC5374254.2s Page GR-45 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Cupa Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 06/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly STANISLAUS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 05/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmental Protection Telephone: 209-525-6751 Last EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SUTTER COUNTY: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 06/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Sutter County Department of Agriculture Telephone: 530-822-7500 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TEHAMA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 01/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Tehama County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 530-527-8020 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TRINITY COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list TC5374254.2s Page GR-46 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 760-352-0381 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TULARE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa program facilities Date of Government Version: 03/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Tulare County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 559-624-7400 Last EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TUOLUMNE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 04/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2018 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Divison of Environmental Health Telephone: 209-533-5633 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies VENTURA COUNTY: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5374254.2s Page GR-47 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/25/2018 Number of Days to Update: 61 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 04/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 06/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 06/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually YUBA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing for Yuba County. Date of Government Version: 05/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/15/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department Telephone: 530-749-7523 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/12/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 01/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5374254.2s Page GR-48 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 107 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 04/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2017 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/29/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. TC5374254.2s Page GR-49 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish & Game Telephone: 916-445-0411 Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5374254.2s Page GR-50 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING APPENDIX D HISTORICAL SOURCES Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Include the following on each aerial photograph without exception unless indicated by project manager:  Property boundary lines (in red). Use the Freeform drawing tool. Do not provide multiple single lines for site outlines. You can copy this shape from frame to frame and adjust size using “Properties” or by locking the aspect ratio and dragging a corner node.  Use Grouping function for multiple parcels.  Zoom in on subject property vicinity and copy from pdf docs. DO NOT copy entire photo.  Provide framed aerial photograph for each photograph discussed in report unless protected by copyright.  Fill in data gaps using other sources.  Contact AEI PM or SA if you have difficulty using this template.  Do not remove extra frames from Word document. DO NOT REMOVE RED INSTRUCTIONAL TEXT Legend Approximate Property Boundary AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH - 1939 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014 Project Number: 392233 Legend Approximate Property Boundary AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH - 1948 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014 Project Number: 392233 Legend Approximate Property Boundary AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH - 1956 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014 Project Number: 392233 Legend Approximate Property Boundary AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH - 1968 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014 Project Number: 392233 Legend Approximate Property Boundary AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH - 1974 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014 Project Number: 392233 Legend Approximate Property Boundary AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH - 1982 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014 Project Number: 392233 Legend Approximate Property Boundary AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH - 1991 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014 Project Number: 392233 Legend Approximate Property Boundary AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH - 1999 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014 Project Number: 392233 Legend Approximate Property Boundary AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH - 2005 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, Califo rnia 95014 Project Number: 392233 Legend Approximate Property Boundary AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH - 2006 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014 Project Number: 392233 Legend Approximate Property Boundary AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH - 2009 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014 Project Number: 392233 Legend Approximate Property Boundary AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH - 2010 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014 Project Number: 392233 Legend Approximate Property Boundary AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH - 2012 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014 Project Number: 392233 392233 10931 North De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA 95014 Inquiry Number: 5374254.5 July 30, 2018 The EDR-City Directory Image Report 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals. RECORD SOURCES EDR's Digital Archive combines historical directory listings from sources such as Cole Information and Dun & Bradstreet. These standard sources of property information complement and enhance each other to provide a more comprehensive report. EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Year Target Street Cross Street Source 2014 EDR Digital Archive 2010 EDR Digital Archive 2005 EDR Digital Archive 2000 EDR Digital Archive 1995 EDR Digital Archive 1992 EDR Digital Archive 1988 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1983 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1978 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1973 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 5374254-5 Page 1 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY STREET 10931 North De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA 95014 Year CD Image Source N DE ANZA BLVD 2014 pg A1 EDR Digital Archive 2010 pg A2 EDR Digital Archive 2005 pg A3 EDR Digital Archive 2000 pg A4 EDR Digital Archive 1995 pg A5 EDR Digital Archive 1992 pg A6 EDR Digital Archive 1988 pg A7 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1983 pg A8 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1978 pg A9 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1973 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 5374254-5 Page 2 FINDINGS CROSS STREETS No Cross Streets Identified 5374254-5 Page 3 City Directory Images - N DE ANZA BLVD EDR Digital Archive 5374254.5 Page: A1 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2014 10745 BARUA, NILANJANA BHARGAV SOLUTIONS INC BRONSTEIN, VLADIMIR I BUI, SEAN T CHANG, CHIA K CHEN, KANJU J CHOI, MOON H CORNWELL, JEFFREY D DALAL, BERAJ DECKINGA, LUCAS W ERASSO, ALEJANDRO F SAVE INVESTMENTS LLC FUNG, HALEY H GOH, TZE C HERAKLES CORP HUANG, NIAN HUNG, CHEUNG L IMALGAM INC JAYARAMAN, SWAMINATHAN JOHNSON, ERIC M LANDRY, ROB J LEE, STEPHEN S LIANG, CHIH MAK, KWOK K MANYAMN, KRISHNA M MATHUR, GAURAV MEDURI, SURENDRA ORGANAMI LLC PABBISETTI, MURALIDHAR PFLUM, KENNETH POOZHIKALAYIL, PRASAD QI, JUN RAJARAM, YASHWANTH K ROMANI, JEAN E SILICON VALLEY REST GROUP SUNDARAMOORTHY, GANESH TSANG, WAI Y UMINO, SATORU VASAVAKUL, PUNNAPA VEDARAJU, TILAK WONG, SHEILA S WU, HUEINI N YEN, Y 10889 FORGE-VIDOVICH MOTEL LIMITED 10931 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY 10991 BAY ONE REAL ESTATE MAXREAL FINANCIAL CUPERTINO/MA 11010 CHEVRON STATIONS INC 11025 CARLOS AUTO REPAIR SERVICES - N DE ANZA BLVD EDR Digital Archive 5374254.5 Page: A2 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2010 10725 NETMANAGE BID CO 10745 BARUA, SOUMAVO BRONSTEIN, VLADIMIR I CHANG, CHIAKUNG CHEN, K CHOI, MYUNG C F SAVE INVESTMENTS LLC FUNG, HALEY H GOH, TZE C HUNG, WING IMALGAM INC KUMAR, MANOJ LEE, SUNG H MA, CHIH L MAK, KWOK K MANYAM, KRISHNA M MATHUR, GAURAV NAVARRO, KARIN E OIKAWA, DAVID H PABBISETTI, MURALIDHAR RAJARAM, YASHWANTH K ROMANI, HARRY J SALES ECONOMICS INC SCHLARMANN, ERIKA M SHI, XIAOJIN SILICON VALLEY REST GROUP SOESILO, NICK SRINIVASULU, SANDHIYA K UMINO, SATORU VASAVAKUL, PUNNAPA VEDARAJU, TILAK WONG, HIUCHUN C YEN, Y 10889 FORGE-VIDOVICH MOTEL LIMITED 10931 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY 10991 ADL GROUP INC BAY ONE REAL ESTATE MAUNG KYI LAY MAXREAL FINANCIAL CUPERTINO/MA QTAHQ BAY ONE CUPERTINO UR WINES & LIQUORS 11010 CHEVRON STATIONS INC 11025 AL-AZZAWY MOHAMMED - N DE ANZA BLVD EDR Digital Archive 5374254.5 Page: A3 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2005 10725 ISRAEL21C INC 10745 SILICON VALLEY REST GROUP 10889 CUPERTINO INN 10931 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY 10991 BAY ONE REAL ESTATE EAST WEST BANK HSIAO JUDITH & ASSOCIATES MANLEY DONUT SHOP MAUNG KYI LAY QTAHQ BAY ONE CUPERTINO W M A SECURITY PETER LUNG WORLD FINANCIAL GROUP WORLD MARKETING ALLIANCE 11010 CHEVRON STATIONS INC 11025 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED - N DE ANZA BLVD EDR Digital Archive 5374254.5 Page: A4 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2000 10725 CALIF ISRAEL CHAMBER COMMER NETMANAGE INC Z-CODE SOFTWARE CORP 10745 SANTA BARBARA GRILL LLC SPORT CITY CAFE 10889 CUPERTINO INN 10895 PHO HOA RESTAURANT 10931 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO THE 10991 HA PHAM WILLIAM A MANLEY DONUT SHOP UNITED NATIONAL BANK W M A SECURITY PETER LUNG WORLD MARKETING ALLIANCE 11010 CHEVRON STATIONS INC 11025 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED - N DE ANZA BLVD EDR Digital Archive 5374254.5 Page: A5 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 10725 NETMANAGE INC 10745 SILICON VALLEY REST GROUP 10889 CUPERTINO INN 10930 JDM PACKING SUPPLIES 10931 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO THE 10991 MANLEY DONUT SHOP THREE SEVEN ONE HOUR PHOTO UR WINES & LIQUORS ZC PARTNERS LP 11010 CHEVRON USA INC 11025 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED - N DE ANZA BLVD EDR Digital Archive 5374254.5 Page: A6 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1992 10725 TALIGENT INC 10745 SPORT CITY CAFE INC 10889 CUPERTINO INN 10930 JDM PACKING SUPPLIES 10931 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO THE 10991 KINKOS COPIES 11010 CHEVRON USA INC 11025 CARLOS CORONA INCORPORATED - N DE ANZA BLVD Haines Criss-Cross Directory 5374254.5 Page: A7 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1988 - N DE ANZA BLVD Haines Criss-Cross Directory 5374254.5 Page: A8 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1983 - N DE ANZA BLVD Haines Criss-Cross Directory 5374254.5 Page: A9 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1978 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com 392233 10931 North De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA 95014 July 26, 2018 5374254.3 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Certified Sanborn Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Contact:EDR Inquiry # Site Name: Client Name: Certification # PO # Project 07/26/18 10931 North De Anza Boulevard 392233 AEI Consultants 2500 Camino Diablo Cupertino, CA 95014 5374254.3 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Tony Chilese The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by AEI Consultants were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. 48A1-4ADB-A95A 168047 UNMAPPED PROPERTY 392233 This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found. Certification #: 48A1-4ADB-A95A AEI Consultants (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5374254 3 2 APPENDIX E REGULATORY AGENCY RECORDS Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 CITY OF CUPERTINO - G®N a ME1 ION. PERMIT NO. " sun m qc ntvtsL iN PERMIT . I, WATION SOBMITTALDATEBUILDINGDDR5. y 4 SANITARY O. N APPLICATION I / yT •" E5 OWN M' NIC C O/NTROLN N . • `/ %• V-'" J\//_ CJ V L l/ 5`!, HONE. goo say) 3-byss ARCHITECTMNGINEER Z O yOZ — O LICENSED CONTRACTORS DECLARATIONn:. I hereby affirm that w licensed under p nms of chapter 9 (cotrmewmg Job Description i-• to with Seclon]0003ofDlvrston 3a( the Beturims m,d Protessidn Cade, admis L« rl1Wc.M Vn.pWuD3 a H iete Cony car uW O Q, ARCHITECTS DELL O 5 C J understand my Plans shall be used as Public retards c ' LicensW professional OWNER-BUR.DER DECLARATION - t. 1 he.;, idificere that I am exempt from she Contractors License Law far the F C toll g (ganon ]031 3 Bmrrc d Prof nom Cade A y ty ry 3F m penin roc alrcr Pr° e d "mi` wbch IN ` S Ft: Floor AreaLI• Valuat onoisniadint .ulna ala rcs Neapplicant f hpoorcgotpemutwNeamgned emamrntrescue, the iment QNathtotheprovumniofofBvacmrCLa...... c, .' commencingwithSectionbecomeiscaw,NSedlon]0007of basis or oftheBusmenandProf taoecdomoft. . Any pausbm oftM1rexempttherefromandthebursfortheallegedaxe AP^NNumber' . Occupancy Type Se aSection7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the appy t I.. civil petulty of L _ 0 / t more tben Ove hurW A dollars (5500) Required Inspections1aaowneroftheprapenyINmyemployemwMwegesuthe' a Iccurnmostion. will do Cade sINv lesionsandProfusions Code: The Contnereco Liana Lew docs lwt apply to lf owntt ofheContractor'soLicenseLawdo apps t anmam r of f _ s thereon, and who does nM1 work m throughprogenywhobuild. or vided t a peed orhisownemployees, provided Nn such improvements w not intended m phare, forsub. is m lefaq thef, hnwevw, pew builthe ofcouoridnonmonoburdenofprovinghe1'owmr-Wilder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for par- Wild improve PoseafseleJ. »' c 6 u i- of the progeny, aiB exclusively convecting wish :) t the project TheM stream isow ]Ona, Busowner and Proroy bo Code:) The Convector's on La dsotappl(Smy who andwhosedporimprovesdammonContractorsmonslirojecnwitheeontnemNs7licenadpursuanttotheContractorsLima. Law --HochLicencelaw. - 1 11• Lima. b. .. '. Iw exemptuMerSee. ,B&PC fm thiirwan Owner Dale WORKER'S COMPENSATTON DECLARATION 1 hand w aRirm ander pendry one of the following dedwtiwu> and i reperjury fe WBheraheon, se of shoo, provided Labcerst r Code,self-ifortidfor byn Section 3]00 of Ne Labor Codc, for the performance of theSsceofthe wink r ch m issued, Permit issued. have a1haveend will no enmaintain N'admrs Compensation Insutmce u req rad by Section or3700afthelabor Code Lor the Pe rmom of live work for whichths pcormi aim ed. MY Woratmn In 5 tt m Policy, Amer ^ o CERTIPICCOMPE XEIONINSFROM W KERSCOMPENSATIONINSURANCE Three secrion need nahcomplemdifthe pemdtix forone huMrtd dollen (3100) or Itis.) r.. 1 I coolly that in the pefmmanceofiie work forwhich this pamet is issued, I" I r '. s not employ my person in my manner so as to become mbjecno the Workers' Common- ration Laws of California. Data ApplicantNOTICE TO APPLICANT: If, after making this Cer ificam of Emeriamn, you should become subject in the Workers Compensation provision of the Labor Code, you ..at a e ^P fonhwiN comply withsuch provisions or this potmWhall be domed revoked CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY t ' 0 Q I hereby affirm thin Nem is a construction lending agency for the performance of the work for which this Permit is issued (Sec 3097. Cie Q Landers Name - Landers Acidness - - a > Tia QI IY centfY d Nthatihavereact application and snm that the above information is 1motrcct agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating to V O buildin cmetomon and hereby amhonarcy ores. Ives of Nncrymenwr upon theaMvementionedpigmyfarindemninspectifylacepes. We) agrees, cove, indemnify keep harmless City 0 an and the of Cummins Bebilitiu,judgmems, costs may in any City Citywayaccmeagunosaidid W in consequence the granting of Nis permit. namm'apenuennut. F 0. NAPPLICANTIINDP.RSTANDg 'D WIILCOMPLY WITH ALL NON -POINT Sig t pphcmtl n tin Date DOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURE P,- Re -roofsWintheapplanrfutumhildinmwpmtsmrcorhmdlehnvdousmmanal az defined by the Cinina Municipal Code aid912ethe Health and Safety Code, Section 25532(e) Type of-Roof, Elyse Will the applicant or future building occupant use equipment or devices which All roofs shall be inspected prior to any roofing inaterial being doescart°ntarninm,///taa.deffted by the BayMaeAnQualityManagement installed. If a roof is installed without first obtaining an'inspeetion istrmithic Yea Q Na i ,..- . I agree to remove all new`materials for inspection. Applicant Ihave real rhehaarrdouam¢ndas Chapter Ctli- i5, u255 understands and"will'com 1 with all. nofi,point source,regpulations. comply p O roma Health B Safety Code, Sections 25505, 25333 and 25534.1 understand Nat if the251533a . I rad lout buildingdocsno rteady eveateum, 't's mY rtspouibiliry in notify Ne occupant of Nap wbi 1 un ba met t uummeofacm-fi;/ c sIIn Signature of Applicant DateOweuNeDam` All roof coverings'to be Class "B" or better , OFFICE CITY OF CUPERTINO BUILDING PERMIT BUILDING ADDRESS: 10931 N DE ANZA BLVD CONTRACTOR: AIRTEKS.COM INC PERMIT NO: 14120118 OWNER'S NAME: VIDOVICH JOHN T ET AL 2432 ARMSTRONG ST DATE ISSUED: 12/22/ 2014 OWNER'S PHONE: 5107190621 LIVERMORE, CA 94551 PHONE NO: (925) 292-0148 LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION JOB DESCRIPTION: RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL TO CLEAR CODE ENFORCEMENT CASE: REMOVE AND License Class G 2. Lic. # 5.r REPLACE 8. 5 TON PACKAGE UNIT. Contractor iY t K_ • t _ Date 12-22-Z f I hereby affirm that I am licensed under the provisions of Chapter 9 commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business & Professions Code and that my license is in full force and effect. I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following two declarations: I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self-insure for Worker's Compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the Sq. Ft Floor Area: Valuation: $12500performanceoftheworkforwhichthispermitisissued. I have and will maintain Worker's Compensation Insurance, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this APN Number: 32610061 00 Occupancy Type: permit is issued. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is PERMIT EXPIRES IF WORK IS NOT STARTED correct. I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating WITHIN 180 DAYS OF PERMIT ISSUANCE OR to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of this city to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. (We) agree to save 180 DAYS FROM LAST CALLED INSPECTION. indemnify and keep harmless the City of Cupertino against liabilities, judgments, costs, and expenses which may accrue against said City in consequence of the Issued by: j%// G Date: granting of this permit. Additionally, the applicant understands and will comply L with all non-point source r ons per the Cupertino Municipal Code, Section 9 18. Z —e e , Signature e 6 RE-ROOFS: All roofs shall be inspected prior to any roofing material being installed. If a roof is installed without first obtaining an inspection, I agree to remove all new materials for inspection. OWNER-BUILDER DECLARATION Signature of Applicant: Date: I here affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for one of the following two reasons: ALL ROOF COVERINGS TO BE CLASS "A" OR BETTER I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec.7044, Business & Professions Code) 1, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURE construct the project (Sec.7044, Business & Professions Code). I have read the hazardous materials requirements under Chapter 6.95 of the California Health & Safety Code, Sections 25505, 25533, and 25534. I will I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following three maintain compliance with the Cupertino Municipal Code, Chapter 9.12 and the declarations: Health & Safety Code, Section 25532(a) should I store or handle hazardous I have and will maintain a Certificate of Consent to self-insure for Worker's material. Additionally, should I use equipment or devices which emit hazardous Compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the air contaminants as defined by the Bay . it Quality Management District I performance of the work for which this permit is issued. will maintain compliance with the Cupert' o Municipal Code, Chapter 9.12 and I have and will maintain Worker's Compensation Insurance, as provided for by the Health & Safety Code, Secjions 25 , 25533, a 534. Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this 12—,??— Owner or authorized age t: tip- Date: permit is issued. I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Worker's CON RUCTION LENDING AGENCY Compensation laws of California. If, after making this certificate of exemption, I become subject to the Worker's Compensation provisions of the Labor Code, I must I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked. work's for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097, Civ C.) Lender's Name APPLICANT CERTIFICATION Lender's Address— I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of this city to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. (We) agree to save ARCHITECT'S DECLARATION indemnify and keep harmless the City of Cupertino against liabilities, judgments, costs, and expenses which may accrue against said City in consequence of the I understand my plans shall be used as public records. granting of this permit. Additionally, the applicant understands and will comply with all non-point source regulations per the Cupertino Municipal Code, Section Licensed Professional 9 18. Signature Date CUPERTINO 11_10d -011e GENERAL PERMIT APPLICATION MEP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • BUILDING DIVISION 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 MISC408) 777-3228 • FAX (408) 777-3333 • building(cDcupertino.org ICAL ELECTRICAL MISCELLANEOUS FLUMbINU CHAN PROJECT ADDRESS / / APN # OWNERNAME , J / I C PHONE j /c?- Q E-MAIL CITY, yCTDATE ZIPz G FAX STREET ADDRESS_'^ ` % N OrfG3 GUJ CONTACT NAME PHONE E-MAIL STREET ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP FAX OWNER OWNER -BUILDER OWNER AGENT ONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGENT ARCHITECT ENGINEER DEVELOPER TENANT CONTRACTOR NAME LICENSE NUMBER LICENSE TYPE fes. L—z BUS. LIC # 1 95 COMPANY NAME E-MAIL_ a1, v ¢ FAX S ETADDRESS CITY, SSE, ZIP I Pcl'_ 3Zr ARCHITECT/ENGINEER NAME LICENSE NUMBER BUS. LIC # COMPANY NAME E-MAIL FAX STREET ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP PHONE USE OF SFD or DUPLEX MULTI-FAMH.Y PROJECT IN WB.DLAND ElYES 7PROJICT IN YES IS THE BLDG AN YES BUILDING: MMERCIALO URBAN INTERFACE AREA NO. LO OD ZONE NO EICHLER HOME? >LNO y DESCRIPTION OF WORK RECEIVED EY, TOTAL VALUATION: By my signature below, Ipertify to each of the following: I am the property owner or authorized agent to act on the property owner's behalf. I have read this application and the in ation I have provided is correct. I have read the Description of Work and verify it is accurate. I agree to comply with all applicable local ordinances and stato4aws relating to buildin ction. a esentatives of Cupertino to enter the above -identified property for inspection purposes. Date: 2 -2 ` l Signature of Applicant/Agent: SUPP MENTAL INFORMATION REQUIRED OFFICE USE ONLY W OYER -THE -COUNTER i>F EXPRESS STANDARD U 1 LARGE i p MAJOR MEPMiscApp_2011.doc revised 06/21/11 CITY OF CUPERTINO WAW 'Ur IV V Q rTX4 A Tnu - III TILLING DIVISION 1' iJJJ ••wJ a FEE ID a .••» -• QTY/FEE ADDRESS: 10931 N De Anza Blvd UNITS DATE: 12/22/2014 REVIEWED BY: SEan Other Appliance/Equip FBP#-: VALUATION: $12,500 APN: 72 1:'i='" h? PERMIT TYPE: Mechanical Permit 11"wirh, hksp, Fee PLAN CHECK TYPE: Alteration /Addition /Repair PRIMARY SFD or Duplex PENTAMATION 1 RMAP1 PERMIT TYPE: i USE: PME Unit Fee: 72.00 WORK To Clear Code Enforcement Case: Remove and replace 8.5 ton package unit. o wr..,.wtion dLia: SCOPE Administrative Fee: IADMIN APPLIANCE / EQUIP TYPE FEE ID a .••» -• QTY/FEE QTY UNITS BP FEES I'hurth_ 1 Ic7:a Ciaecis Other Appliance/Equip 113APPLOT 1 72 1:'i='" h? 11"wirh, hksp, Fee PME Unit Fee: 72.00 PME Permit Fee: 48.00 o wr..,.wtion dLia: Administrative Fee: IADMIN 45.00 Work Without Permit? (E) Yes 0 No 120.00 TOTALS: Travel Documentation Fee: ITRAVDOC 72.00 StronV Motion Fee: IBSEISMICR NOTE: This estimate does not includejees due to other Departments (Le. rianmrcg, ruuuc rrEll na, A 11c, u.w•y •-• - •-•-- _._ r. ... ,:r r r ..,,d gra nnhi an o.ctimatn_ Contact the Dept for addn 7 info. District, etc.. [hese fees are based on cne /GIN 111-1 FEE ITEMS (Tee Resolution 11-053 Eff. 7/1/13) b,[ v, noucw.c uvu..w FEE a .••» -• QTY/FEE MISC ITEMS 0 $0.00Mech. Plan Check 0hrs I'hurth_ 1 Ic7:a Ciaecis S":tf y)l Mech. Permit Fee: IMPERMIT Fter Mech. Insp. 0.0 hrs $48. 00 01h,". -r 111vMb Irrs 1:'i='" h? 11"wirh, hksp, Fee NOTE: This estimate does not includejees due to other Departments (Le. rianmrcg, ruuuc rrEll na, A 11c, u.w•y •-• - •-•-- _._ r. ... ,:r r r ..,,d gra nnhi an o.ctimatn_ Contact the Dept for addn 7 info. District, etc.. [hese fees are based on cne /GIN 111-1 FEE ITEMS (Tee Resolution 11-053 Eff. 7/1/13) b,[ v, noucw.c uvu..w FEE a .••» -• QTY/FEE MISC ITEMS S":tf y)l PME Plan Check: 0.00 PME Unit Fee: 72.00 PME Permit Fee: 48.00 o wr..,.wtion dLia: Administrative Fee: IADMIN 45.00 Work Without Permit? (E) Yes 0 No 120.00 Travel Documentation Fee: ITRAVDOC 48.00 StronV Motion Fee: IBSEISMICR 1.63 Select an Administrative Item Bldg Stds Commission Fee: IBCBSC 1.00 335.63 TOTAL FEE.• 0.00$335.63 Revised: 10/0V2014 r Installation Table 1. Maximum unit & comer weights (lbs) and center of gravity dimensions (in.) - cooling models Maximum Model Center of Gravity Unit Weights(a) Corner Weights(b) (in.) Ton Model No. Shipping Net A S C D Length Width 3 TSC036E/THCO36E 555 481 157 122 95 107 31 19 4 TSC048E 586 511 167 129 101 114 31 19 5 TSCO60E 636 561 183 142 111 125 31 19 6 TSC072F 762 667 218 186 131 132 44 21 71/2 TSCO90F 781 686 222 195 136 134 44 21 71/2 TSC092F 940 797 249 235 163 149 46 21 81/2 TSC102F 999 856 264 239 177 175 45 22 10 TSC120F 1058 960 320 218 233 189 40 24 3 THC037E 614 544 163 144 111 125 33 19 4 THC048E/THCO47E 787 692 220 178 132 163 40 23 4 THC048F 737 642 208 177 128 130 44 22 5 THC060E/ THC067E 841 746 241 193 139 173 39 22 5 THC060F 774 679 219 189 135 137 43 21 6 THC072F 883 740 228 219 155 138 47 21 71/2 THC092E 1445 1228 347 330 269 283 49 28 71/2 THC092F 1026 928 315 209 224 180 40 24 81/2 THC102E 1472 1_12.55 359 335 271 290 48 28 10 THC120E 1462 1245 353 332 271 288 48 28 a) Weights are approximate. b) Corner weights are given for information only. Figure 15. Rigging and center of gravity CLEVIS Table 2. Factory installed options (fiops)/accessory net weights (Ibs)(a),(b) TSC036E-060E THC047E-067E THC036E/ THC048E/F- TSC072F-102F THC092F, THCO92E- THC037E 060E/F THC072F TSC120F 120E Net Weight Net Weight Net Weight Net Weight Net Weight Accessory 3- 5 Ton 4-5 Ton 6-81/2 Ton 71/2.-10 Ton 71/2-10 Ton Barometric Relief 7 10 10 10 10 Belt Drive Option (3 phase only) 31 31 Coil Guards 12 20 20 20 30 continued on next page 20 RT-SVX22J-EN Inhncnn r.nntrols Unitary Products 5186;64Nf-E-1210 Table 9: ZS -06 thru -12 Physical Data Models Component ZS -06 ZS -07 ZS -08 ZS -10 ZS -12 Nominal Tonnage 6.51 7.5 8.5 10 12.5 ARI COOLING PERFORMANCE Gross Capacity @ ARI A point (Mbh) 81000 90000 104000 126000 156000 ARI net capacity (Mbh) 78000 88000 101000 120000 150000 EER 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 11.2 IEER 13 12.1 12.5 12.5 12.7 IPLV 12.9 12.1 12.5 12.6 13.06 Nominal CFM 2600 2500 3000 4000 4100 System power (KW) 6.95 7.87 8.60 10.70 13.40 Refrigerant type R -410A R-41 OA R-41 OA R-41 OA R-41 OA Refrigerant charge (Ib -oz) System 1 4-12 4-12 4-14 6- 8 7-8 System 2 4-10 4-10 5-0 6-8 7-8 ARI HEATING PERFORMANCE Heating model 12 18 12 18 12 18 18 24 18 24 Heat input (K Btu) 120 180 120 180 120 180 180 240 180 240 Heat output (K Btu) 96 144 96 144 96 144 144 192 144 192 AFUE % Steady state efficiency (%) 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 No. burners 4 6 21 21 4 6 21 21 4 6 21 21 6 8 21 21 6 8 21 21 No. stages Temperature Rise Range (°F) 20-50 35-65 15-45 1 30- 60 10-40 25-55 20-50 35-65 10-40 25-55 Gas Limit Setting (°F) 165 165 165 165 215 195 195 160 195 160 Gas piping connection (in.) 3/4 3/4 3/4 1 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 DIMENSIONS (inches) 89 89 89 89 119-1/2 Length 59 59 59 59 59 Width 42 42 50-3/4 50-3/4 50-3/4 Height OPERATING WT. (lbs.) 860 880 1020 1060 1253 COMPRESSORS Type Recip Recip Recip Recip Scroll 2. 2 2 2 2 Quantity Unit Capacity -Steps(./.) 50/100 50/100 50/100 50/100 50/100 CONDENSER COIL DATA Face area (Sq. Ft.) 18.5 18.5 18.5 29.0 29.0 Rows 1 1 1 1 1 23 23 23 23 23 Fins per inch 71/18 71/18 1/25 Tube diameter (in.)/mm 71/18 71/18 2 -pass 2 -pass 2 -pass 2 -pass 2 -pass Circuitry Type Microchannel Microchannel Microchannel Microchannel Microchannel EVAPORATOR COIL DATA Face area (Sq. Ft.) 10. 6 10.6 13.2 13.2 13.2 3 3 3 4 3 Rows 15 15 15 15 15 Fins per inch 0.375 0.375 0.375 0.375 0.375 Tube diameter Intertwined Intertwined Intertwined Intertwined Intertwined Circuitry Type TXV TXV TXV TXV TXV Refriaerant control Inhncnn r.nntrols Unitary Products Plot Plan with unit locations Front Goodyear 8773 10931 North De Anza Raod Cupertino, CA Back RECEIVED NOV 2 2 2014 BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTBUILDINGDIVISION - CUPERTINO APPROVED This set of plans and specifications N1UST be kept at thejobsiteduringconstruction. It is unlawful to make anychangesoralterationsonsame, or to deviatetherefrom, without approval from the Building Official. The Stamping of this plan and specifications SHALL NOTbeheldtopermitortobeanapprovaloftheviolationBanyprovisionsofanyCitOrdinanceorStateLaw. DAT—E- T PERMIT # PPANS flA air DAVEs G SEPT. Change existing 8.5 -Tan package unit: with new 8.5 -ton unit (like for like) Note: 1) Hook up existing high voltage electrical 2) Hook up existing gas 3) Hook up existing low voltage wiring 4) Reconnect existing duct smoke detector. i 5) Hook up existing condensate piping New Coleman ZS-8N12ATAAA6A (6) 4750 CFM 208/230/60/3 Gas Package unit. i (7) 2100 square feet N Weight 1020 pounds ' 0 ( 8) Factory Economizer m , ham H Goodyear 8773 10931 North De Anza Raod Cupertino, CA o f h i a ur HuruKNIH REQUIRED ACCEPTANCE TESTS MECHANICAL COMPLIANCE FORMS & WORKSHEETS (indicate if worksheet is included) For detailed instructions on the use of this and all Energy Efficiency Standards compliance forms, refer to the 2013 Nonresidential Manual Note: The Enforcement Agency mayrequireallformstobeincorporatedontothebuildingplans. Forms NRCC-MCH-04-E and NRCC-MECH-05-E are alternative forms to NRCC-MCH-01-E, NRCC-MCH-02-E and NRCC- MCH-03-E for projects using only single zone packaged HVAC systems. YES NO Form X NRCC-MCH-04-E (1 of 2) X NRCC-MCH-04-E (2 of 2) X NRCC-MCH-05-E (1 of 2) X NRCC-MCH-05-E (2 of 2) Title Certificate of Compliance. Required on plans when used. Mechanical Acceptance Tests. Required on plans when used. HVAC Prescriptive Requirements. It is required on plans when used. Mechanical SWH Equipment Summary is required for all submittals with service water heating, pools or spas. It is required on plans where applicable. CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2Q13 Nonresidential Compliance June 2014 STATE OF CALIFORNIA REQUIRED ACCEPTANCE TESTS CEC-NRCC-MCH-04-E Revised 06/14 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Required Acceptance Tests Project Name: Q—J ve.A b r ? -j j C2 i Date Preparedi CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION N RCC -MCH -04-E Page 2 of 3) Designer: This form is to be used by the designer and attached to the plans. Listed below are all the acceptance tests for mechanical systems. The designer is required to check the applicable boxes by all acceptance tests that apply and list all equipment that requires an acceptance test. If all equipment of a certain type requires a test, list the equipment description and the number of systems. The NA number designates the Section in the Appendix of the Nonresidential Reference Appendices Manual that describes the test. Since this form will be part of the plans, completion of this section will allow the responsible party to budget for the scope of work appropriately. Enforcement Agency: Systems Acceptance. Before occupancy permit is granted for a newly constructed building or space, or a new space -conditioning system serving a building or space is operated for normal use, all control devices serving the building or space shall be certified as meeting the Acceptance Requirements for Code Compliance. Systems Acceptance. Before occupancy permit is granted. All newly installed HVAC equipment must be tested using the Acceptance Requirements.. The NRCC-MCH-04-E form is not considered a completed form and is not to be accepted by the building department unless the correct boxes are checked. The equipment requiring testing, person performing the test (Example: HVAC installer, TAB contractor, controls contractor, PE in charge of project) and what Acceptance test must be conducted. The following checked -off forms are required for ALL newly installed and replaced equipment. In addition a Certificate of Acceptance forms shall be submitted to the building department that certifies plans, specifications, installation certificates, and operating and maintenance information meet the requirements of Section 10-103(b) and Title 24 Part 6. The building inspector must receive the properly filled out and signed forms before the building can receive final occupancy. Test Description Equipment Requiring Testing or Verification of units MCH -02-A Outdoor Air MCH -03-A Single Zone Unitary MCH -04-A Air Distribution Ducts MCH -05-A Economizer Controls MCH -06-A Demand Control Ventilation DCV) MCH -07-A Supply Fan VAV MCH -11-A Automatic Demand Shed Control MCH -12-A FDD for Packaged DX Units MCH -14-A Distribute d Energy Storage DX AC MCH -18-A Energy Managem ent Control Test Performed By: Systems System ZS -8N12 1 X X X CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2013 Nonresidential Compliance June 2014 REQUIRED ACCEPTANCE TESTS CEC-NRCC-MCH-04-E Revised 46/14 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSIONCERTIFICATEOFCOMPLIANCE NRCC-MCH-04-ERequiredAcceptanceTests ( Page 3 of 3} Project Name: Goodyear 877310931 NORTH DE ANZA BLVD Cupertino, CA Date Prepared: 11/15/2014 DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR'S DECLARATION STATEMENT 1. 1 certify that this Certificate of Compliance documentation is accurate and complete. Documentation Author Name: Jerry Bohland Documentation Author Signature: f / Company: Airteks.com, Inc. Signature Date: f11/17/2024 Address: 2432 Arnstrong Street CEA/ HERS Certification Identifi tion (if applicable): City/state/Zip: Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: 925-292-0148 RESPONSIBLE PERSON'S DECLARATION STATEMENT I certify the following under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California: 1. The information provided on this Certificate of Compliance is true and correct. 2. 1 am eligible under Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to accept responsibility for the building design or system design identified on this Certificate of Compliance (responsibledesigner). 3. The energy features and performance specifications, materials, components, and manufactured devices for the building design or system design identified on this Certificate of ComplianceconformtotherequirementsofTitle24, Part 1 and Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. The building design features or system design features identified on this Certificate of Compliance are consistent with the information provided on other applicable compliance documents, worksheets, calculations, plans and specifications submitted to the enforcement agency for approval with this building permit application. 5. 1 will ensure that a completed signed copy of this Certificate of Compliance shall be made available with the building permit(s) issued for the building, and made available to the enforcementagencyforallapplicableinspections. I understand that a completed signed copy of this Certificate of Compliance is required to be included with the ocu the builder provides to thebuildingowneratoccupancy. Responsible Designer Name: ,ferry Bohland Responsible Designer Signature: Company : Airteks.com, Inc. Address: 2432 Arnstrong Street Livermore, CA 94551 CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2013 Nonresidential Compliance Date Signed: 11/17/2014 License: 930172 Phone: 925- 292-0148 lune 2014 STATE OF CALIFORNIA REQUIREMENTS FOR PACKAGED SINGLE ZONE UNiTS CEC-NRCC-MCH-05-E (Revised 06/14) CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NRCC-MCH-05-E Requirements for Packaged Single -Zone Units (Page 1 of 2) Project Name: Goodyear 8773 10931 NORTH DE ANZA BLVD Cupertino, CA Date Prepared: 11/15/2014 Equipment Tag(s) l MANDATORY MEASURES Heating Equipment Efficiency4 Cooling Equipment Efficiency4 Thermostats5 Furnace Standby Loss Contro16 Law Leakage AHU Ventilation? Demand Control Ventilation$ Occupant Sensor Ventilation Control$ Shutoff and Reset Controls9 Outdoor Air and Exhaust Damper Control Automatic Demand Shed Controls Economizer FDD Duct Insulation PRESCRIPTIVE MEASURES Equipment is sized in conformance with 140.4(a&b) Economizer Electric Resistance Heatingi0 Duct Leakage Sealing and Testing." T-24 Sections Requirement3 As Scheduled3 Requirement3 As Scheduled3 Requirement3 As Scheduled3 110.1 or 110.2(a) 80% 80% 110.1 or 110.2(a) 11.2 EER 11.2 EER 110.2(b), 110.2(c) Setback setback 110.2(d) N/A N/A 110.2(f) N/A N/A 120.1(b) N/A N/A 120.1(c)4 N/A N/A 120.1(c)5, 120.2( e)3 N/A N/A 120.2(e) N/A N/A 120.2(f) N/A N/A 120.2(h) N/A N/A 120.2(i) Yes Yes 120.4 N/A N/A 140.4(a & b) 140.4(e) 140.4(8) 140.401 Notes: 1. Provide equipment tags (e.g. ACI orAC1 to 101. Multiple units of the same make and model with the same application and accessories can be grouped together. 2. Enter the following information as appropriate: Unit Manufacturer; Unit Model Number (including all accessories); Description of the unit (e.g. gas -pack or heat pump; rated heating capacity enter "N/A" if no heating); and, rated cooling capacity (enter "N/A° if no cooling). For unit capacities include the units (e.g. kBtuh or tons). 8. For each requirement, enter the minimum requirement from the Standard In the left column (under "Standard Requirement"). In the right column (under "As Scheduled") enter the value for the units as specified. 4. Where there is more than one requirement (e.g. full and part load efficiency) enter both with the appropriate labels (e.g. COP and /EER). 5. In the left column identify the thermostatic requirements from the standard (e.g. programmable setback thermostat or heatpump with electric heat), . In the right column indicate the capabilities of the thermostat as scheduled. 6. If the unit has a furnace which is rated at >=225,000 Btuh of capacity, indicate the rated standby loss and ignition source (e.g. IID). If there is no furnace or the unit is rated for <225,000 Btuh indicate "N/A". Z In the left column, enter both the required ventilation value from Table 120.1A and for the number of occupants times 15 cfm/person. In the right column enter the actual minimum ventilation as scheduled. If the space is naturally ventilated enter "N/A" in the left column and "the space is naturally ventilated" in the right column. 8. If the space is required to have either DCV or Occupant Sensor Ventilation Control indicate "required" in the left column (otherwise indicate "N/A" in the left column). If either DCV or Occupant Sensor Ventilation Control is provided indicate "provided" in the right column (otherwise indicate "N/A" in the right column) 9. In the left column indicate the required time controls from the standard. In the right column identify the device that provides this functionality (e.g. EMCS or programmable timeclock). 10. Enter N/A if there is no electric heating. If the system has electric heating indicate which exception to 140.4(8) applies. 11. If duct leakage sealing and testing is required, a MCH -04-A form must be submitted. CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2013 Nonresidential Comptiance June 2014 QI^I=vrruirvrttvih p qREQUIREMENTSFORPACKAGE® SINGLE ZONE UNITS U=U-NKX-1V1GH-05-E Revised 06/14 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION ' .W' CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NRCC-MCH-05-E Requirements for Packaged Single -Zone Units (Page 2 of 2) Project Name: Goodyear 877310931 NORTH DE ANZA BLVD Cupertino, CA Date Prepared: 11/ 15/2014 DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR'S DECLARATION STATEMENT 1. 1 certify that this Certificate of Compliance documentation is accurate and complete. Documentation Author Name: Jerry Bohland Documentation Author Signature Company: Airteks.com, Inc. Signature Date: 11/17/2014 Address: 2432 Armstrong Street CEA/ HERS Certification Iden ifcation (if applicable): City/state/Zip: Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: 925-292-0148 RESPONSIBLE PERSON'S DECLARATION STATEMENT I certify the following under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California: 1. The information provided on this Certificate of Compliance is true and correct. 2. 1 am eligible under Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to accept responsibility for the building design or system design identified on this Certificate of Compliance (responsible designer). 3. The energy features and performance specifications, materials, components, and manufactured devices for the building design or system design identified on this Certificate of Compliance conform to the requirements of Title 24, Part 1 and Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. The building design features or system design features identified on this Certificate of Compliance are consistent with the information other documents, provided on applicable compliance worksheets, calculations, plans and specifications submitted to the enforcement agency for approval with this building permit application. 5. 1 will ensure that a completed signed copy of this Certificate of Compliance shall be made available with the building permit(s) issued for the building, and made available to the enforcement agency for all applicable inspections. I understand that a completed signed copy of this Certificate of Compliance is required to be incl ed wit the documentation the builder provides to the building owner at occupancy. Responsible Designer Name: Jerry Bohland Responsible Designer Signature: Company: Airteks.com, Inc. Date Signed: 11/17/2014 Address: 2432 Armstrong Street License: 930172 City/State/Zip: Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: 92S-292-0148 CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2013 Nonresidential Compliance June 2014 41 STATE OF CALIFORNIA REQUIR8D ACC STS CEC-NRCC-MQH-04-E (ReVis r ma" CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSIONCERTIFICATEOFCPLIANCE Required Accepta ce Tests NRCC-MCH-04-E Page 1 of 3) Project Name: G odyear 877310931 NORTH DE ANZA BLVD upertino, CA Date Prepared: 11/ 15/2014 MECHANICAL CE FORMS & indicate if worksheet Is included) For detailed instructio on the use o Isand all Energy Efficiency Standards compliance forms, refer to the 2013 Nonresidential Manual Note: The Enforcement Agency mayrequire- all forms to be incor ed onto the building plans. Forms NRCC-MCH-04-E and NRCC-MECH-05-E are alternative forms to NRCC-MCH-01-E, NRCC-MCH-02-E and NRCC- MCH-03-E for projects using only single zone packaged HVAC systems. YES NO Form X NRCC-MCH-04-E (1 of 2) X NRCC-MCH-04-E (2 of 2) X NRCC-MCH-05-E (1 of 2) X NRCC-MCH-05-E (2 of 2) Title Certificate of Compliance.'Required on plans when used. Mechanical Acceptance Tests. Required on plans when used. HVAC Prescriptive Requirements. It is required on plans when used. Mechanical SWH Equipment Summary is required for all submittals with service water heating, pools or spas. It is required on plans where applicable. CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2013 Nonresidential Compliance June 2014 STATE OF CALIFORNIA REQUIRED ACCEPTANCE TESTS CEC-NRCC-M6,H-04-E Revised 06/14 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSIONCERTIFICATEOFCOMPLIANCE NRCC-MCH-04-E Required Acceptance Tests ( Page 2 of 3) Project Name: r^4v V C 6 % I `, 1 i . • .J r Date Prepared: Designer: This form is to be used by the designer and attached to the plans. Listed below are all the acceptance te'ts for mechanical systems. The designer is required to check the applicable boxes by all acceptance tests that apply and list all equipment that requires an acceptance test. If all equipment of a certain type requires a test, list the equipment description and the number of systems. The NA number designates the Section in the Appendix of the Nonresidential Reference Appendices Manual that describes the test. Since this form will be part of the plans, completion of this section will allow the responsible party to budget for the scope of work appropriately. Enforcement Agency: Systems Acceptance. Before occupancy permit is granted for a newly constructed building or space, or a new space -conditioning system serving a building or space is operated for normal use, all control devices serving the building or space shall be certified as meeting the Acceptance Requirements for Code Compliance. Systems Acceptance. Before occupancy permit is granted. All newly installed HVAC equipment must be tested using the Acceptance Requirements.. The NRCC-MCH-04-E form is not considered a completed form and is not to be accepted by the building department unless the correct boxes are checked. The equipment requiring testing, person performing the test (Example: HVAC installer, TAB contractor, controls contractor, PE in charge of project) and what Acceptance test must be conducted. The following checked -off forms are required for ALL newly installed and replaced equipment. In addition a Certificate of Acceptance forms shall be submitted to the building department that certifies plans, specifications, installation certificates, and operating and maintenance information meet the requirements of Section 10-103(b) and Title 24 Part 6. The building inspector must receive the properly filled out and signed forms before the building can receive final occupancy. Test Description MCH -02-A MCH -03-A MCH -04-A MCH -05-A MCH -06-A MCH -07-A MCH -11-A MCH -12-A MCH -14-A MCH -18-A Test Performed By: Equipment # of Outdoor Single Zone Air Economizer Demand Supply Automatic FDD for Distribute EnergyRequiringunitsAirUnitaryDistributionControlsControlFanVAVDemandPackageddEnergyManagemTestingorDuctsVentilationShedADXUnitsStorageentVerification (DCV) Control DX AC Control Systems System ZS -8N 12 1 X X X CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2013 Nonresidential Compliance June 2014 REQUIRED ACCEPTANCE TESTS Ute-NKUL;-Mu1-i-04-t Kevised 05114 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NRCC-MCH-04-E Required Acceptance Tests ( Page 3 of 3) Project Name: Goodyear 877310931 NORTH DE ANZA BLVD Cupertino, CA Date Prepared:. 11/15/2014 DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR'S DECLARATION STATEMENT 1. 1 certify that this Certificate of Compliance documentation is accurate and complete. Documentation Author Name: Jerry Bohland Documentation Author Signature: Company: Airteks.com, Inc. Signature Date: 11/17/201 Address: 2432 Arnstrong Street CEA/ HERS Certification Identifi tion (if applicable): City/state/zip: Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: 925-292-0148 RESPONSIBLE PERSON'S DECLARATION STATEMENT I certify the following under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California: 1. The information provided on this Certificate of Compliance is true and correct. 2. 1 am eligible under Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to accept responsibility for the building design or system design identified on this Certificate of Compliance (responsibledesigner). 3. The energy features and performance specifications, materials, components, and manufactured devices for the building design or system design identified on this Certificate of Compliance conform to the requirements of Title 24, Part 1 and Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. The building design features or system design features identified on this Certificate of Compliance are consistent with the information provided on other applicable compliance documents, worksheets, calculations, plans and specifications submitted to the enforcement agency for approval with this building permit application. 5. 1 will ensure that a completed signed copy of this Certificate of Compliance shall be made available with the building permit(s) issued for the building, and made available to the enforcementagencyforallapplicableinspections. I understand that a completed signed copy of this Certificate of Compliance is required to be included with the docu the builder provides to thebuildingowneratoccupancy. Responsible Designer Name: Jerry Bohland Responsible Designer Signature: company: Airteks.com, Inc. Date Signed: 11/17/2014 Address: 2432 Arnstrong Street License: 930172 Phone: 925-292-0148City/state/zip: Livermore, CA 94551 CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2013 Nonresidential Compliance June 2014 0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA REQUIREMENTS FOR PACKAGED SINGLE ZONE UNITS 1+ , GLG-NKGG-MGhi-Ub-t Kevisea Ub/74 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NRCC-MCH-05-E . Requirements for Packaged Single -Zone Units (Page 1 of 2) Project Name: Goodyear 8773 10931 NORTH DE ANZA BLVD Cupertino, CA Date Prepared: 11/15/2014 Equipment Tag(s)' MANDATORY MEASURES T-24 Sections Requirement3 As Scheduled3 Requirement3 As ScheduledRequirement3 As ScheduledHeatingEquipment Efficiency4 110.1 or 110.2(a) 80 80% Cooling Equipment Efficiency4 110.1 or 110.2(a) 11.2 EER 11.2 EER ThermostatS5 110.2(b), 110.2(c) Setback Setback Furnace Standby Loss Contro16 110.2(d) N/A N/A Low Leakage AHU 110.2(f) N/A N/A Ventilation? 120.1(b) N/A N/A Demand Control Ventilation$ 120.1(c)4 N/A N/A Occupant Sensor Ventilation Controls 120.1(c)5, 120.2(e)3 N/A N/A Shutoff and ,Reset Controls 120.2(e) N/A N/A Outdoor Air and Exhaust Damper Control 120.2(f) N/A N/A Automatic Demand Shed Controls 120.2(h) N/A N/A Economizer FDD 120.2(i) Yes Yes Duct Insulation 120.4 N/A N/A PRESCRIPTIVE MEASURES Equipment is sized in conformance with 140.4(a & b) 140.4(a&b) Economizer 140.4(e) Electric Resistance Heating10 140.4(8) Duct Leakage Sealing and Testing." 140.4(1) Notes: 1. Provide equipment togs (e.g. AC1 orAC1 to 10). Multiple units of the same make and model with the same application and accessories can be grouped together. 2. Enter the following information as appropriate: Unit Manufacturer; Unit Model Number (including all accessories); Description of the unit (e.g. gas -pack or heat pump; rated heating capacity enter "N/A" if no heating); and, rated cooling capacity (enter "N/A" if no cooling). For unit capacities include the units (e.g. kBtuh or tons). 3. For each requirement, enter the minimum requirement from the Standard In the left column (under "Standard Requirement"). In the right column (under "As Scheduled") enter the value for the units as specified. 4. Where there is more than one requirement (e.g. full and part load efficiency) enter both with the appropriate labels (e.g. COP and LEER). 5. In the left column identify the thermostatic requirements from the standard (e.g. programmable setback thermostat or heatpump with electric heat), . In the right column indicate the capabilities of the thermostat as scheduled. 6. if the unit has a furnace which is rated at>=225,000 Btuh of capacity, indicate the rated standby loss and ignition source (e.g. IID). If there is no furnace or the unit is rated for <225,000 Btuh indicate "N/A". 7. In the left column, enter both the required ventilation value from Table 120.1A and for the number of occupants times 15 cfm/person. In the right column enter the actual minimum ventilation as scheduled. If the space is naturally ventilated enter "N/A" in the left column and "the space is naturally ventilated" in the right column. 8. If the space is required to have either DCV or Occupant Sensor Ventilation Control indicate "required" in the left column (otherwise indicate "N/A" in the left column). If either DCV or Occupant Sensor Ventilation Control is provided indicate "provided" in the right column (otherwise indicate "N/A" in the right column) 9. In the left column indicate the required time controls from the standard. In the right column identify the device that provides this functionality (e.g. EMCS or programmable timeclock). 10. Enter N/A if there is no electric heating. If the system has electric heating indicate which exception to 140.4(g) applies. 11. If duct leakage sealing and testing is required, a MCH -04 -A form must be submitted. CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2013 Nonresidential Compliance June 2014 o i m i r- yr .nurvrtt%ire REQUIREMENTS FOR PACKAGED SINGLE ZONE UNITS GH -05-E CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NRCC-MCH-05-E Requirements for. Packaged Single -Zone Units Page 2 of 2) Project Name: Goodyear 877310931 NORTH DE ANZA BLVD Cupertino, CA Date Prepared: 11/15/2014 DOCUMENTATION AUTHOR'S DECLARATION STATEMENT 1. 1 certify that this Certificate of Compliance documentation is accurate and complete. Documentation Author Name: ferry Bohland Documentation Author Signature: r Company: Airteks.com, Inc. Signature Date: f 11/ 17/2014 Address: 2432 Armstrong Street CEA/ HERS Certification Iden fication (if applicable): City/State/Zip: Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: 925-292-0148 RESPONSIBLE PERSON'S DECLARATION STATEMENT I certify the following under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California: 1. The information provided on this Certificate of Compliance is true and correct. 2. 1 am eligible under Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code to accept responsibility for the building design or system design identified on this Certificate of Compliance (responsible designer). 3. The energy features and performance specifications, materials, components, and manufactured devices for the building design or system design identified on this Certificate of Compliance conform to the requirements of Title 24, Part 1 and Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations. 4. The building design features or system design features identified on this Certificate of Compliance are consistent with the information on other compliance documents, provided applicable worksheets, calculations, plans and specifications submitted to the enforcement agency for approval with this building permit application. S. i will ensure that a completed signed copy of this Certificate of Compliance shall be made available with the building permit(s) issued for the building, and made available to the enforcement agency for all applicable inspections. I understand that a completed signed copy of this Certificate of Compliance is required to be incl ed wit the documentation the builder provides to the building owner at occupancy. Responsible Designer Name: Jerry Bohland Responsible Designer Signature:" Company: Airteks.com, Inc. Date Signed: 11/17/2014 Address: 2432 Armstrong Street License: 930172 City/State/Zip: Livermore, CA 94551 Phone: 925-292-0148 CA Building Energy Efficiency Standards - 2013 Nonresidential Compliance June 2014 CITY OF CUPERTINO BUILDING PERMIT BUILDING ADDRESS: 10931 N DE ANZA BLVD CON RA 'TPR:: PERMIT NO: 15070002 OWNER'S NAME: VIDOVICH JOHN T ET AL L DATE ISSUED: 07/09/2015 OWNER'S PHONE: 6502093244 rlll rb,15;1 ro PHONE NO: LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION JOB DESCRIPTION: RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL y REMOVE EXISTING LIFT AND INSTALL NEW LIFT AND License Class — - Lic. # } N) 125 AMP SUB- PANEL. Cont Date — r- 1 hereby affirm that 1 am licen ed under the provisions of Chapter 9 commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business & Professions Code and that my license is in full force and effect. I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following two declarations: I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self - insure for Worker's Compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the Sq. Ft Floor Area: Valuation: $14977rformanceoftheworkforwhichthispermitisissued. have and will maintain Worker's Compensation Insurance, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this APN Number: 32610061.00 Occupancy Type: permit is issued. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that 1 have read this application and state that the above information is PERMIT EXPIRES IF WORK IS NOT STARTED correct. I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating WITHIN 180 D IT ISSUANCE OR to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of this city to enter ROMupontheabovementionedpropertyforinspectionpurposes. (We) agree to save 180,DS L„ LED INSPECTION. e indemnify and keep harmless the City of Cupertino against liabilities, jud costs, and expenses which may accrue against said City in consequ of th ..- Issued a .af: °.. / granting of this permit. Additionally, the applicant understan comply with all non -point source regulations per the Cupertino Municipal Code, Section 9.18. RE- ROOFS: Signature Date roofs shall be inspe,,pkIt Mprior to any roofing material being installed. If a roof is installed without first obtaining an inspection, I agree to remove all new materials for inspection. OWNER- BUILDER DECLARATION Signature of Applicant: Date: I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for one of the following two reasons: ALL ROOF COVERINGS TO BE CLASS "A" OR BETTER 1, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec.7044, Business & Professions Code) I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURE construct the project (Sec.7044, Business & Professions Code). l have read the hazardous materials requirements under Chapter 6.95 of the California Health & Safety Code, Sections 25505, 25533, and 25534. I will I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following three maintain compliance with the Cupertino Municipal Code, Chapter 9.12 and the declarations: Health & Safety Code, Section 25532(a) should 1 store or handle hazardous I have and will maintain a Certificate of Consent to self - insure for Worker's material. Additionally, should I use equipment or devices which emit hazardous Compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the air contaminants as defined by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District 1 performance of the work for which this permit is issued. will maintain compliance with the Cu ertino Municipal Code, Chapter 9.12 and I have and will maintain Worker's Compensation Insurance, as provided for by the Health &Safety Code, Sectio 25 5, 2 33, an 25534. Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this Owner or authorized agent: Date: `— permit is issued. I certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Worker's Compensation laws of California. If, after making this certificate of exemption, I CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCI' become subject to the Worker's Compensation provisions of the Labor Code, I must I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked. work's for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097, Civ C.) Lender's Name APPLICANT CERTIFICATION Lender's Address I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of this city to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. (We) agree to save ARCHITECT'S DECLARATION indemnify and keep harmless the City of Cupertino against liabilities, judgments, costs, and expenses which may accrue against said City in consequence of the I understand my plans shall be used as public records. granting of this permit. Additionally, the applicant understands and will comply with all non -point source regulations per the Cupertino Municipal Code, Section Licensed Professional 9.18. Signature_ Date CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • BUILDING DIVISION 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014 -3255 f (408) 777 -3228 • FAX (408) 777 -3333 • buildingocupertino.org CUPLRTINO I lSo 70 0- NEW CONSTRUCTION ©', ADDITION ALTERATION / TI REVISION /DEFERRED ORIGINAL PERMIT N P1201EC7 ADDRESS X A APN O2-(:7- OWNS / f jR l PHO E- NIAII. r o Gil O Z STREET D S' FAX r CONTACT NAME 4 PH NF E- IL STREET ADDRESS CITY, SI AI L•, ZIP FAX 4VNER OwN.ER- BUID_DER OWNER AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGENT ARCHITECT ENGNEER DEVELOPER TENANT CONTRACTOR NAME LICEN TM F LICENSETYPE IAAZ' BUS. LIC COMPANY N. E- AIL FAX STREET ADDRESS CITY, STATE. ZIP PHONE ril.:NGIN'E NAME LICENSE NUM13ER p0 BUS.LICR COhIPA TIE ' E- 7 FAX STREET- AT DRE:', ST- TE. PF[O L• ^ DLSClul "I'lON OF wVORK !/ 1 7 C.C"wo \v E\IsThNIUSE PROPOSED USE CONSTX. TYPE n STORIES USE TYPE OCC, SQ.E -r. VALUATION (S) EXIS "IG NEWFLOOR DE IO 7`0 "I`fLL AREA AREA AREA NET AREA BATHROOM KITCHEN OTHER REMODEL AREA REMODEL AREA REMODEL AREA PORC 41 AIWA DECK AREA "I'OTAL DECK /PORCI I AREA GARAGE AREA: DETACH ATTACH DYY'£LI,DNG UNITS: IS A SECOND UNTr []YES SECOND STORY []YES BEING ADDED? []NO ADDITION? []NO PRE :APPLICATION [] YES IF YES. PROVIDE COPY OF IS THE BLDG AN YES RECEIVE Y: TOTAL VALUATION: PLANNING APPI, tt []NO PLANNING APPROVAL LETTER EICHLER HOME? []NO 141 .1T By my signature below, I certify to each of the following: I am the property owner or authorized agent to act on the property owner's behalf I have read this application and the information 1 have provided is correct. I have read the Description of Work and verify it is accurate. I agree to comply with all applicable local ordinances and state laws relating to iag c structi , ;authorize representatives of Cupertino to enter the above- identified property for ins ection purposes. Signature oI'Applicant/Agent: `= Date:_ SUPPLEMENTAL, INFORMATION REQUIRED PLAN CfIECK TYPE RotrriNG SLIP fl OVE'R.THE- COUNTER BUILDING PLAN REVIEWNewSlDorMultifamilydwellings: Apply for demolition perDIlt for existing building(s). Demolition permit is required prior to issuance of building permit for new building. EXPRESS PLANNING PLAN REVIEW Commercial Bldgs: Provide a completed Hazardous Materials Disclosure STANDARD PUBLIC WORKS form if any Hazardous Materials are being used as part of this project. LARGE FIRE DEPT . Copy of Planning Approval Getter or Meeting with Planning prior to 1LAiOR SANITARY SEWER DISTRICT FM-7 CITY OF CUPERTINO FEE ESTIMATOR - BUILDING DIVISION A1Ieeh. Plan Check Heck Pernail Fee. Other Mech. Insp. Llech. hup. Fee. Plumb. Plan Check Plumb. Peraril Fee: Other Plumb Insp. Plumb. Insp. Fee. Elec. Plan Check 0.0 1 hrs $0.00 Elec. Permit Fee: 1EPERMIT Other Elec. Insp. 10.0 hrs $48.00 Elec. hasp. Fee: NOTE. This estimate does not include fees due to other Departments (i.e. Planning, Public Works, Fire, Sanitary Sewer District, School nictrirt otr_ )_ Thoco fooc nro hacod nn tho nroliminary informatinn availahto and nro nniv an aetimato. Cnntart the nent for addn'l into. FEE ITEMS (Fee Resolution 11 -053 Eff. 711113) DRESS: 10931 N De Anza Blvd DATE: 07/01/2015 REVIEWED BY: Sean MISC ITEMS ALPN: BP #: VALUATION: 1$14,977 PERMIT TYPE: Building Permit PLAN CHECK TYPE: Alteration / Addition / Repair PRIMARY USE: Commercial Building Civil / Religious activities in B zone? Yes E: Q Q No PENTAMATION PERMIT TYPE: 1 GENCOM WORK Remove existing lift and install new lift and N 125 amp sub-panel. SCOPE 125 1 amps Electrical 48.00 IBELEC200 Services A1Ieeh. Plan Check Heck Pernail Fee. Other Mech. Insp. Llech. hup. Fee. Plumb. Plan Check Plumb. Peraril Fee: Other Plumb Insp. Plumb. Insp. Fee. Elec. Plan Check 0. 0 1 hrs $0.00 Elec. Permit Fee: 1EPERMIT Other Elec. Insp. 10.0 hrs $48.00 Elec. hasp. Fee: NOTE. This estimate does not include fees due to other Departments (i.e. Planning, Public Works, Fire, Sanitary Sewer District, School nictrirt otr_ )_ Thoco fooc nro hacod nn tho nroliminary informatinn availahto and nro nniv an aetimato. Cnntart the nent for addn'l into. FEE ITEMS (Fee Resolution 11 -053 Eff. 711113) FEE QTY/FEE MISC ITEMS Plan Check Fee: Hourly Only? C) Yes 0 No 0.00 0 hours Plan Check, Hourly 143.00 ISTPLNCKSuppl. PC Fee: (F) Reg. () OT 0.0 1 hrs 0.00 PME Plan Check: 0.00 125 1 amps Electrical 48.00 IBELEC200 ServicesPermitFee: Hourly Only? Q Yes Q No 0.00 Suppl. Insp. Fee: Reg. Q OT 0.0 1 hrs 0.00 PME Unit Fee: 0.00 PME Permit Fee: 48.00 Construction Tax: 1BCONSTAXC 0.00 Administrative Fee: 1ADMI,N 45.00 0 Work Without Permit? 0 Yes 0 No 0.00 Advanced Planning Fee: 0.00 hours Inspections 286.00 1STINSP Inspection, HourlyTravelDocumentationFee: ITRAVDOC 48.00 Strong Motion Fee: IBSEISMICO 4.19 Select an Administrative Item 1BldgStdsCommissionFee: IBCBSC 1.001 S IBTOTAL$: ; 146.19 477.00 TOTAL FEE; 623.19 Revised: 0510712015 S L21 0 /S L212 Conventional Control 800 & 1000 Series) SL210i Moveable Pad Capacity 8,000 lbs. SL210i Capacity 10,000 lbs. SL212i Capacity 12,000 lbs. JUL 0 2015 REVIEWED FaR GONE GOMPL OPERATING 1 1 1 Lift is not intended for outdoor use and has an operating ambient temperature range of 410- 104OF(50-40 0C) Attention! ! ! lJ February 2015 by Vehicle Service Group. LP20446 I N20484 All rights reserved. C09304.1 Rev. G 2/19/2015 L A; i l f T,,7' j r 1 f f I iT I a0A ; NIA11 Ll H Failure To Comply Will Void Warranty Edge Of Grade Indicator D • • D v • p • ". p • . p. " p • ". p v7. ..O.a •rr. .O .1. psa••t>:G''p •'p•p'p p• p• D• D' D' Concrete MUST BE Finished To Edge Of Grade Indicator, NOT The Top Of The Lift. Finished Floor Level Must Be 1/4" Below Top Of Lift On All Sides. Grade Indicator Concrete P• °'t:. °'p • °' per °' ti:r °' 1 Owner: Your Installer Is Responsible For The Concrete Floor Being Finished To Grade Angle, NOT To The Top Of The Lift. Failure To Comply Will Void Warrant IMPORTANT Contact with the electrical heating coils could cause electrolysis and damage the lift and /or its components. Make sure the lift frame concrete anchors do not contact electrical heating coils, or re -bar that may be in contact with other embedded electrical sources. The lift being physically connected to any source which promotes electrolysis will void the warranty. SEISMIC - Varies by location consult with your structural engineer and manufacturer's representative. The supplied concrete fasteners meet the criteria of the American National Standard Automotive Lifts - Safety Requirements for Construction, Testing, and Validation" ANSI /ALI ALCTV -2011, and the lift owner is responsible for all charges related to any additional anchoring requirements as specified by local codes. Contact customer service for further information at: 866.341.5438 INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS 1/4" Air Line to Latch Release Air Valve In -line Air Filter (by Rotary) Shut Off Valve by Installing Contractor) In -Line Pressure Regulator/Water Separator (by Installing Contractor) Hydraulic Hose to Lift by Installing Contractor) Electrical Power Supply by Installing Contractor) Latch Release Air Valve (by Rotary) r Unit (by Rotary) Air Line to Locking Latch (by Rotary) PVC Conduit for Air and Hydraulic Hose (by Installing Contractor) Wheel Spotting Dish (by Rotary) Lift (by Rotary) - - Please follow these instructions to ensure a good installation and satisfactory operation of the lift. Check your shipment against the product load list and shipping papers. Enter claims for damage or shortage with the delivering carrier at once. After installation, please return this booklet to the literature package and give to lift owner /operator. Literature package should be kept attached to power unit for easy access. Review entire installation instructions before beginning excavation. IMPORTANT -rhe center cover is designed for foot traffic only. AWARNING Restrict all unauthorized persons from going near excavation. OSHA standard restricts anyone from getting in excavated hole, unless OSHA guidelines are followed. See OSHA Excavating Standard CFR 1926. Keep excavated hole covered and barricaded when installation is not in progress. WORK BENCH (TYPICAL) PVC Conduit 12'-0" Min. to Entrance for Air Nearest & Hydraulic Hose Obstruction 0 or Per cc Section 1c 0. Wheel Spotting Dish T–i 4'9" Swing Arm Lifts PVC Inlet Into Containment Tube TO" Moveable Pad Lifts , Foot traff ic only on center cover 5'-0^ Min. Vo nearest obstruction -- L------------J--------------/ 5'-0^ Min. »o nearest obstruction --~- SL 212 2 S ^ SL 21 0 Series WORK BENCH (TYPICAL) PVC Conduit Entrance for Air 13'-0" Min. to Nearest Hydraulic Hose Obstruction 0 or Per W Section 1c 0. Wheel Spotting Dish PVC Inlet Into Containment Tube 4- 9" Foot traff ic on center cover L------------J--------------/ 5'- 0^ Min. »o nearest obstruction --~- SL 2122 S ^ 1. Lift Location: A. Check architect's layout if available. Lay out lift as shown in Fig. 1. Recommended floor slope is 1/16" per foot. B. SU10• The 5' 6" centerline to side and 12' 0" centerline to front and rear dimensions should be maintained to provide adequate working space. The minimum overhead clearance should be 85" plus height of highest vehicle to be raised. 24' 0" length bay recommended. Other lengths may be used, provided ample clearance is maintained at each end of lift. SUIZ The 5' 6" centerline to side and 13' 0" centerline to front and rear dimensions should be maintained to provide adequate working space. The minimum overhead clearance should be 88" plus height of highest vehicle to be raised. 26' 0" length bay recommended. Other lengths may be used, provided ample clearance is maintained at each end of lift. C. Base Unit Lifts: If you are planning to install roll -on/ wheel alignment runways, locate lift per instructions from superstructure manufacturer. Use superstructure manufacturer's instructions for fore and aft, side to side, and ceiling clearances. 2. Excavation: Excavate hole to dimensions shown in Fig. 2. Dig trench for 2" PVC pipe between lift and power unit location. Trench should be dug 11" below finished floor grade. Air line and hydraulic hose to be contained in this 2" PVC pipe. 3. Concrete Preparation: A. Run 2" PVC from Control Area to Containment Tube. PVC will enter the Containment Tube 9 -1/2" below finished floor grade. Hole is centered horizontally in Containment Tube, Fig. 1. B. Box out a 5' x 10' area around where lift is to be located. NOTE: For multiple lift installations, boxed out areas will overlap. Dig continuous trench, see illustration below. C. Pour concrete floor ensuring not to get concrete in boxed out area. NOTE: By using this installation method, the RAI can more accurately set lift to proper grade relative to finished floor. Reference Page 2. Continuous Trench Lift Location Concrete Floor 10 ' 1-10. - Lift Location 4. Lift Settin IMPORTANT Check the containment tube for holes due to snipping . Do not install a damaged containment tube. Contact Rotary Lift Customer Service. A. Chain hoist must have capacity of 2,500 lbs. with a clear swing of 9' 0 ". Rig sling for unit, attaching to the shipping strap, Fig. 3, and lower assembly into hole. Center lift and be sure lift containment inlet is located as shown in Fig. 1. IMPORTANT Owner: Your Installer Is Responsible For The Concrete Floor Being Finished To The Leading Edge Of The Grade Angle (1/4" Below Top Of Lift), NOT To The Top Of The Lift, Fig. 5. Failure To Comply Will Void Warranty. B. Bend frame anchors out perpendicular to concrete frame and downward approximately 45° to floor level, Fig. 2. C. Remove and retain (4) 1/2 " -13NC HHCS (marked with X, Fig. 3). Insert 1/2" Threaded Rods x 18" Ig. into the holes and secure in place using 1/2" flat washers and nuts, Fig. 4. D. Attach 6 x 6's to support unit on existing floor and secure in place with 1/2" flat washers and nuts, Fig. 4. Remove shipping straps and install guide barrel bolts in open holes and torque to 60 ft -Ibs. Remove protective covers from top of jacks. 73 -5/8 Frame Anchor Frame Width I I i;<•` o:i 18 110" !.:e Clean Pea w. ,Gravel Fill Wall Bracket 2" PVC Pipe Power U 6 " -8° 23 -3/ 8" 9 -1/2" Unit Frame ----I I Lift & Containment Tube 7,200 Ibs. maximum reaction longitudinal and transverse direction due to eccentric loads 36" 15,000 Ibs. maximum vertical loads Lift & Containment Tube E. Plumb and level by placing machinist level on top of jack. Do Not plumb or level off unit frame. See Fig 5. F. Shore Lift Securely! G. Connect 2" PVC to containment tube, chamfer PVC entering containment tube seal and lubricate I.D. of seal with grease or oil to ease entry of PVC into seal. PVC pipe should extend into containment tube 1" maximum. NOTE: If your PVC pipe and containment inlet do not align, you may have to cut back PVC pipe, and attach 2" Flexible PVC to make connection. All PVC joints MUST be leak proof. H. Recheck plumb. X Shipping X I Straps Fig. 3 5. Backfill: A. Duct tape joint areas indicated by X, Fig. 6, to protect these areas during backfill and concrete work. Backfill around unit using only pea gravel to within 18" of top of finished floor. ACAUl10N Do not use a mechanical tamper or saturate the backfill material to achieve compaction. This could cause lift containment sides to bend inward, HAND TAMP ONLY. IMPORTANT Do Not fill plunger with any ballast material. B. Complete backfill and tamp pipe trench. C. After lift is backfilled, make final elevation and plumb checks, Fig 5. D. Make sure frame anchors are bent out, Fig. 7. 6. Concrete Work: A. Leave 6 x 6's in place. B. New concrete around the lift must be keyed into existing floor with rebar or stud anchors, Fig. 7. 2) 1 /2 " -13NC x 18" Ig. Threaded Rod, 6 x 6's Flat Washers, & Nuts Fig. G. A minimum concrete strength of 3,000 PSI is suggested. DO NOT use calcium chloride as a curing accelerator. If using a curing accelerator, we recommend a non - chloride additive such as High Early* or equivalent. D. Pour concrete floor, being careful not to run concrete in and around top surface of lift unit. IMPORTANT Owner: Your Installer Is Responsible For The Concrete Floor Being Finished To The Leading Edge Of The Grade Angle (1/4" Below Top Of Lift), NOT To The Top Of The Lift, Fig. 5. Failure To Comply Will Void Warranty. IMPORTANT It is imperative that lift be set level regardless of floor slope or other factors. Trowel smooth and allow to harden. E. After concrete is set -up, remove 6 x 6's and threaded rods. F. Reinstall the guide barrel bolts, use Loctite 242 (blue) on bolts and torque to 60 ft. -lbs. G. Do not use lift until concrete has achieved 3,000 PSI. Cor Floc Cor Floi Tape Covers Tape Covers X Center Cover X X Grade Indicator Fig. 6 X High Early is a registered trademark of General Portland Cement Company. 4nchor 7. Power Unit: A. For operating convenience, locate Power Unit mounting bracket so top of Motor will be approximately 56" above floor, Fig. 2. B. Locate and mount the wall bracket, using (4) 3/ 8" wall anchors, on the wall. Anchors must be able to hold 20 lbs. of shear force. C. Put (21 5/16 " -18NC x 1 -1/2" flanged locking HHCS through holes in the air valve bracket then through wall bracket, if rear mounted air valve bracket is supplied, using push -nuts to hold in place, Fig. 8. Put the other (2) 5/16 " -18NC x 1 -1/2" flanged locking HHCS through wall bracket using push -nuts to hold in place, Fig. 8. D. Mount power unit, with motor up, to the wall bracket and install (4) 5/16" flanged locking nuts, Fig. 8. E. Install and hand tighten elbow adapter to pump until 0 -ring is seated, Fig. 11. Continue to tighten the locknut to 10 -15 ft -lbs., or until the nut and washer bottom out against the pump manifold. NOTE: You may still be able to rotate the Branch Tee. This is acceptable unless there is seepage at the 0 -ring. If so, slightly tighten the locknut. ACAU110 Over tightening locknut may tear 0 -ring or distort threads in pump manifold outlet. Use (4)5/16 " -18NC x 1 - 1/2" Ig. Flanged Locking HHCS Push nuts hold bolts to brackets ANI Use (4) 5/16 " -18NC Flanged Locking Nuts Fig. 8 8. Electrical: Have a certified electrician run appropriate power supply to motor, Fig. 9 & 10. Size wire for 20 amp circuit. See Motor Operating Data Table. ACAU110N Never operate the motor on line voltage less than 208V. Motor damage may occur. IMPORTANT: Use separate circuit for each power unit. Protect each circuit with time delay fuse or circuit breaker. For single phase 208 -23OV, use 20 amp fuse. Three phase 208 -24OV, use 20 amp fuse. For three phase 4O0V and above, use 10 amp fuse. For wiring see Fig. 9 & 10. All wiring must comply with NEC and all local electrical codes. Note: 60Hz. single phase motor CAN NOT be run on 5OHz. line without a physical change in the motor. Raise Switch Lowering Valve Fill Breather Cap MOTOR OPERATING DATA TABLE - SINGLE PHASE LINE VOLTAGE RUNNING MOTOR VOLTAGE RANGE 208 -230V 5OHz. 197 -253V 208 -230V 60Hz. 197 -253V Wiring Diagram Up Switch Black Black Black 230V 60Hz MSinglePh Green White White Black 208 -230V 60Hz Single Phase, Attach black wire to black wire. White M/ Green Attach ground wire here. Re -seal Between Gasket Box And Spacer With Silicone Drum Switch Sealer And Cover 4) IV15 x 45 PHMS, Plated 4) M5 x 10 PHMS, Plated Capacitor Box To Power Unit L l 1 2 L 3 Phase Lo 3 — MOTOR 360 -440V Supply L o-- 06 518V -632V PE DRUM SWITCH Three Phase Power Unit MOTOR OPERATING DATA TABLE -THREE PHASE LINE VOLTAGE RUNNING MOTOR VOLTAGE RANGE 208 -240V 50 /60Hz. 197 -253V 400V 50Hz. 360 -440V 440 -480V 50 /60Hz. 396V -528V 575V 60Hz. 518V -632V Capacitor Box Attachment Option Two Fig, 10 L3 T3 T9 L2 2 rs Ll T1 T7 208 -240V 50 /6011z. 30 10 L3 L2 L1 440 -480V 50/60 Hz. 30 380 -400V 50 Hz. 30 Attach white wire to red wire. Capacitor Box 1 y 9. Supply Lines (By Installer): Remove center cover. A. Hose: 1. Hose must meet Dayco EZ Flex 150 or equivalent specs. with 3,000 PSI minimum working pressure, 3/8" I.D. with 9/16- 18THD, JIC fitting, female swivel ends. 2. Hose must be free of debris. Inspect all threads for damage, Fig. 11. 3. Push the hose through the 2" PVC pipe chase from power unit to lift unit. 4. Install hose onto elbow adapter on power unit and to hydraulic fitting in lift containment inlet. Fig. 11 6. Install "PUSH TO RELEASE LATCHES" decal on bracket under air valve lever, Fig. 12. 7. Push air line tubing through the 2" PVC pipe chase from latch release air valve to lift unit. 8. Connect air line tubing to latch release air valve and to air line attached to vertical hose using push union, in lift containment inlet. Place decal on bracket, Figs. 12 & 13. 10. Fluid Filling: A. System capacity is 19 quarts. Use Dexron III ATF, or Hydraulic Fluid that meets ISO 32 specification. B. Remove fill- breather cap, Fig. 8. C. Pour in 8 quarts of fluid. D. Bleed lift by cycling to full rise several times. E. Fully lower lift. Ibow Adapter IMPORTANT Lift must be fully lowered before changing or adding fluid. Crimped Hose Sleeve (Typical) F. Add fluid to power unit until it reaches the MIN mark on the tank. Power Unit Hose to Lift. Hose must G. Replace fill- breather cap. meet Dayco EZ Flex 150 or equiv. ACAU11O If fill- breather cap is lost or broken, order a Specs. with 3,000 replacement. DO NOT substitute with a solid plug. PSI min. working pressure, 3/8" I.D. with 9/ 16 -18THD JIC Fitting, Female Swivel Ends. Flared Fittings Tightening Procedure 1. Screwthe fittings together finger tight. Then, using the proper size wrench, rotate the fitting 2 -1/2 hex flats. 2. Backthe fitting off one full turn. 3. Againtightenthe fittings fingertight; then using a wrench, rotate the fitting 2 -1/2 hex flats. This will complete the tightening procedure and develop a pressure tight seal. B. Air Line: JIMPORTANTI Shop air supply pressure must be between 90 to 120 psi. 1. Attach brass filter and swivel elbows to air latch, Fig. 12. 2. Install latch release air valve to bracket, Fig. 12. 3. Remove motor warnings decal from motor cover. Mount air lock valve bracket over the power unit cover using the existing cover screws if single phase. If three phase use included longer screws. 4. Connect shop air supply with factory supplied in -line filter to latch release air valve 1/4" push -in 1/4" NPT fitting, Fig. 12 Fig. 13. 5. Air line to the lift must be 1/4" polypropylene tubing with a 300 PSI working pressure. M5x15 PHMS For 10 Inline Filter Motor Cover Mounted M5 x 50 PHMS For 30 1/4' Push -In Fitting Air Valve Bracket 1/4" Air Line By Installer 8 -32N C o (To compressor Or Main Air) Nylon Locknut r Q p Air Valve 1/4" Air Line To Tee) PAY ATTENTION TO NUMBERING SEQUENCE ON AIR VALVE 1/4" Air Line To Slot in runway for Air Locks M Air Valve / m PUSH TO RELEASE LATCHES" DECAL 8 -32NC x 1 -1/2" PHMS 4W Air Line Fitting Connection Push Union Air Line Tubi 12 fig. 13 m 11. PRESSURE TEST: C. Use a non -metal object (do not scratch or scar the cylinder A. Run lift to full rise and keep motor running for 5 seconds. rods), try to move the cylinder rod. If it does not move skip step D. B. Stop and check all hose connections. D. Move the cylinder rod around until its boss goes back into the C. Tighten or reseal if required. Repeat cycling of lift if load pad center hole. adjustment was made. 12. LOCKING LATCH TEST- A. With lift in up position, actuate latch release air valve B. Make sure latch engages and releases. 13. CYLINDER/LOAD PAD TEST: A. Raise lift to full rise and lower onto locks. B. Look into the containment tube to check that the high pressure cylinder rod is in the load pad hole, Fig. 14. CYLINDER/LOAD PAD TEST Pi A -k,nnA Mffinn Fig.1 inder Rod Boss Load Pad se Fitting Hydraulic Hose Fig. 15 13 14. HOSE TRACKING TEST: A. Have someone raise the lift while another watches the tracking of the hose between the frame bulkhead and equalizer beam, Fig. 15. If the hose does not track between the members of the equalizer beam without rubbing, adjustment is necessary. B. Rotate the bulkhead fitting to adjust the position of the hose. Make sure that the bulkhead nut is tight after adjustment. 15. Setting Cover, refer to Fig. 16: A. Insert cover seal into lip in opening, making sure all holes align. B. Install center cover onto seal. C. Install and ti hten cover retaining bolts. Torque to 60 ft -Ibs. JIMPORTANTI Clean areas indicated with X, Fig. 16, and seal with a premium 25 year silicone. 16. Superstructure: S1210 Series: A. Base Unit Lifts: Install roll -on /wheel alignment runway per instructions from superstructure manufacturer. B. Swing Arm Superstructures: 1. Install yokes to plungers with 7 /8 " -10NC x 2 -1/2" HHCS and 7/8" external tooth lockwasher. Torque to 150 ft -Ibs, Fig. 17. 2. Grease swivel arm pins and arm holes with Lithium grease. 3. Install (4) arm assemblies using the arm pins and snap rings. C. Moveable Pad Assemblies: Note: The mounting holes in the pad assemblies are offset. This allows fortwo different configurations. The standard configuration is shown in fig 18a. The narrower configuration is shown in fig 18b. 1. Install pads on lift using 7 /8 " -10NC x 2 -1/2" HHCS and 7/8" external tooth lockwasher and torque to 150 ft. -Ibs, Fig.18a and 18b. SL212 series: A. Base Unit Lifts: Install roll -on /wheel alignment runway per instructions from superstructure manufacturer. B. Swing Arm Superstructures: 1. Install yokes to plungers with 7/8 "ANC x 3 -1/2" HHCS and 7/8" external tooth lockwasher. Torque to 150 ft -Ibs., Fig. 19. 2. Grease swivel arm pins and arm holes with Lithium grease. 3. Install (4) arm assemblies using the arm pins and cotter pins, Fig. 20. 17. Final Touches: A. Lag wheel spotting dish to floor using two 3/8" anchors provided. Verify model number of lift being installed and refer to Fig. 1 for respective dimensions. B. Raise lift and clean sand and dirt from plunger and lift area. C. Double check to make sure the guide barrel and center cover are sealed per Step 14. 18. Upon completion of the assembly of the lift, the lift is to be operated to assure proper function. Observe for locks operating in all locking positions, each side lifts equally, hydraulics do not leak, all electrical controls function as labeled, all pneumatics are functional and leak free, ramps rotate freely (if applicable), and proper clearances with all items in bay have been maintained. X— Operate the lift with a typical vehicle and observe to assure the same items for proper functioning. 7/8" -9NC x 2 -1/2" HHCS and 7/8" External Tooth Lockwasher Arm Pin Snap Ring i i 800 SERIES ARMS X X X 0 0 o X- X 0 o o X 090 X X X \ X Center Cover 4W Arm Pin 7/8" -9NC x 2 -1/2" HHCS and 7/8" External Tooth Lockwasher Snap Ring A Fey. n 1000 SERIES ARMS 7/8" -9NC x 2 -1/2" HHCS and 7/8" External Tooth Lockwasher 14 7/8" -9NC x 2 -112" HHCS and 7/8" External Tooth I Lockwasher T 7/8" -9NC x 3 -1/2" HHCS & 7/8" External Tooth Lockwasher iE 15 Arm Pin o Cotter Pin Installer: Please return this booklet to literature package, and give to lift owner/ operator. Thank You Trained Operators and Regular Maintenance Ensures Satisfactory Per- formance of Your Rotary Lift Contact Your Nearest Authorized Rotary Parts Distributor for Genuine Rotary Replacement Parts. See Literature Package for Parts Breakdown. Revision Date 08/15/07 A 02/21/08 B 09/22/10 C 03/29/11 D 04/05/12 E 02/14/ 14 F 08/ 07/14 G 02/19/15 Rotary World Headquarters 2700 Lanier Drive Madison, IN 47250, USA www.rotarylift.com Change(s) Made New 800 Series lift. Correct errors in 800 series installion instructions. Update graphics for 3 phase motors and control bracket. Added 1000 arm series. Remove star washers, note P/U mounting bolts and nuts are locking. Identify air valve bracket mounting screws. Update to include latest standard and narrow M -Pads. Add final check notes. North America Contact Information Tech. Support: p 800.445.5438 f 800.578.5438 e userlink @rotarylift.com Sales: p 800.640.5438 f 800.578.5438 e userlink @rotarylift.com World Wide Contact Information World Headquarters /USA: 1.812.273.1622 Canada: 1.905.812.9920 European Headquarters /Germany: +49.771.9233.0 United Kingdom: +44.178.747.7711 Australasia: +60.3.7660.0285 Latin America / Caribbean: +54.3488.431.608 Middle East / Northern Africa: +49.771.9233.0 li CITY OF CUPERTINO BUILDING PERMIT BUILDING ADDRESS: 10931 N DE ANZA BLVD OWNER'S NAME: VIDOVICH JOHN T ET AL OWNER'S PHONE: 4082552166 LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION License Class Lic. # I 1 U&s +SM' Date ' Contractor d I hereby affirm that I am licensed under the provisiol of Chapter 9 commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business & Professions Code and that my license is in full force and effect. 1 hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following two declarations: I have and will maintain a certificate of consent to self- insure for Worker's Compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain Worker's Compensation Insurance, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that 1 have read this application and state that the above information is correct. l agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of this city to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes. (We) agree to save indemnily and keep harmless the City of Cupertino against liabilities, judgments, costs, and expenses which may accrue against said City in consequence of the granting of this permit. Additionally, the applicant understands and will comply with all non -point source regulations per the Cupertino Municipal Code, Section 9.18. Signatu ate OWNER- BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the Contractor's License Law for one of the following two reasons: 1, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, wil I do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (See.7044, Business & Professions Code) 1, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec.7044, Business & Professions Code). I hereby affirm under penalty of perjury one of the following three declarations: I have and will maintain a Certificate of Consent to self- insure for Worker's Compensation, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. I have and will maintain Worker's Compensation Insurance, as provided for by Section 3700 of the Labor Code, for the performance of the work for which this permit is issued. 1 certify that in the performance of the work for which this permit is issued, I shall not employ any person in any manner so as to become subject to the Worker's Compensation laws of California. If, after making this certificate of exemption, I become subject to the Worker's Compensation provisions of the Labor Code, I must forthwith comply with such provisions or this permit shall be deemed revoked. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply with all city and county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of this city to enter upon the above mentioned property for inspection purposes (We) agree to save indemnify and keep harmless the City of Cupertino against liabilities, judgments, costs, and expenses which may accrue against said City in consequence of the granting of this permit. Additionally, the applicant understands and will comply with all non -point source regulations per the Cupertino Municipal Code, Section 9.18. Signature Date CONTRACTOR: EDWARDS &SONS PERMIT NO: 15010175 AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT 3573 VINEYARD AVE DATE ISSUED: 01 /29/2015 PLEASANTON, CA 94566 PHONE NO: (925) 918 -7449 JOB DESCRIPTION: RESIDENTIAL [] COMMERCIAL GOODYEAR; INSTALL GROUND LIFT Sq. Ft Floor Area: I Valuation: $17000 APN Number: 32610061.00 1 Occupancy Type: PERMIT EXPIRES IF WORK IS NOT STARTED WITHIN 180 DAYS OF PERMIT ISSUANCE OR 180 DAYS FIZ6AST CALLED INSPECTION. Issued by: Date: — 1)r RE- ROOFS: All roofs shall be inspected prior to any roofing material being installed. If a roof is installed without first obtaining an inspection, I agree to remove all new materials for inspection. Signature of Applicant: Date: ALL ROOF COVERINGS TO BE CLASS "A" OR BETTER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURE I have read the hazardous materials requirements under Chapter 6.95 of the California Health & Safety Code, Sections 25505, 25533, and 25534. I will maintain compliance with the Cupertino Municipal Code, Chapter 9.I2 and the Health & Safety Code, Section 25532(a) should I store or handle hazardous material. Additionally, should I use equipment or devices which emit hazardous air contaminants as defined by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District I will maintain compliance with the Cupertino Municipal Code, Chapter 9.12 and the Health & Safety Code, Sections 25505,25533, and 2554. j Owner or authorized CONSTRUCTION LENDING AGENCY I hereby affirm that there is a construction lending agency for the performance of work's for which this permit is issued (Sec. 3097, Civ C.) Lender's Name Lender's ARCHITECT'S DECLARATION I understand my plans shall be used as public records. Licensed Professional CUPERTINO CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT • BUILDING DIVISION 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014 -3255 408) 777 -3228 • FAX (408) 777 -3333 • building(dcupertino.org NEW CONSTRUCTION ADDITION 4 ALTERATION / TI REVISION / DEFERRED ORIGINAL PERMIT # PROJECT ADDRESS 1, 7APN# v 82.1p-io-ow OWNERNAME Tavi No th rin ,o 21U, L E -MAIL FAX CONTACT NAME PHONE E -MAIL STREET ADDRESS CITY, STATE, ZIP FAX OWNER OWNER- BURDER OWNER AGENT CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR AGENT ARCHITECT ENGINEER DEVELOPER TENANT CO L1CL 1 LICEb?P all."A E -MAIL Awe IWn .Oof 1'1 FAYgSh ©.1///N00.0i Z 111 IAq4 BUS. LIC # G • LICENSE NUMBER MA1 312. qUq 11L; E AD ES Y, qy 2 P 5'-2 • /1M DESCRIPTION OF WORK in in *LP. V Y 130 1 EXISTING USE PROPOSED USE CONSTR. TYPE STORIES USE TYPE OCC. SQ.FT. VALUATION (S) EXISTG NEW FLOOR DEMO TOTAL AREA AREA AREA NET AREA BATHROOM KITCHEN OTHER REMODEL AREA REMODEL AREA REMODEL AREA PORCH AREA DECK AREA TOTAL DECK/PORCH AREA GARAGE AREA: DETACH ATTACH DWELLING UNITS IS A SECOND UNIT YES SECOND STORY YES BEING ADDED? ONO ADDITION? ONO PRE - APPLICATION YES IF YES, PROVIDE COPY OF IS THE BLDG AN YES RECEIVED B . T=: PLANNING APPL # NO PLANNING APPROVAL LETTER EICHLER HOME? NO 1 By my signature below, I certify to each of the following: I am the property owner or authorized agent to act on the property owner's behalf. I ha4e mad this application and the information I have provided is correct. I have read the Description of Work and verify it is accurate. I agree to comply with all applicable local ordinances and state laws rela ' to building constru ion. authorize re resental#4es of Cupertino to enter the a ove -id ntified prope for inspection purposes. Signature of Applicant/Agen Date: SUPPLE AL INFORMATION REQUIRED PLAN CBECK TYPE ROUTING SI>p OVER- TH&COUNTER BUILDING PLANREVIrwNewSFDorMultifamilydwellings: Apply for demolition permit for existing building(s). Demolition permit is required prior to issuance of building permit for new building. EXPRESS PLAWGNG PLAN JMVIEW Commercial Bldgs: Provide a completed Hazardous Materials Disclosure 11 STANDARD PUBLIC WORKS form if any Hazardous Materials are being used as part of this project. LARGE FIRE DEPT Copy of Planning Approval Letter or Meeting with Planning prior to 11 MAJOR SANrrARYSEVYERBISTRtC'I' submittal of Building Permit application. ENVIRONMENTALIIEALTH BldgApp_2011.doc revised 06121111 lw'o CITY OF CUPERTINO FEE ESTIMATOR — BUILDING DIVISION ADDRESS: 10931 n de anza blvd FEE ID DATE: 01/29/2015 REVIEWED BY: Mendez UNITS APN: DBP #: , 01- Ste- VALUATION: $17,000 PERMIT TYPE: Electrical Permit PLAN CHECK TYPE: Alteration / Addition / Repair PRIMARY Commercial BuildingUSE: 179 PENTAMATION 10EAP 8PERMITTYPE: WORK good year; install ground lift SCOPE APPLIANCE / EQUIP TYPE FEE ID QTY /FEE QTY UNITS BP FEES Other Power Devices 1 BREMPOWER 1 179 PME Unit Fee: 179.00 PME Permit Fee: 48.00 Administrative Fee: 1ADMIN 45.00 Work Without Permit? 0 Yes (j) No 0.00 TOTALS: Travel Documentation Fee: ITRAVDOC 179.00 Strom Motion Fee: IBSEISMICO NOTE: This,estimate does not include fees due to other Departments (i.e. Planning, Public Works, Fire, Sanitary Sewer District, School District. etc.). These fees are based on the nreliminary information available and are only an estimate. Contact the Dent for addn'i info. FEE ITEMS lee Resolution I1 -053 Eff 7%11"13) FEE QTY /FEE Elec. Plan Check 0.0 hrs $0.00 Elec. Permit Fee: IEPERMIT Other Elec. Insp. 0. 0 hrs $48.00 NOTE: This,estimate does not include fees due to other Departments (i.e. Planning, Public Works, Fire, Sanitary Sewer District, School District. etc.). These fees are based on the nreliminary information available and are only an estimate. Contact the Dent for addn'i info. FEE ITEMS lee Resolution I1 -053 Eff 7%11"13) FEE QTY /FEE MISC ITEMS i PME Plan Check: 0.00 PME Unit Fee: 179.00 PME Permit Fee: 48.00 Administrative Fee: 1ADMIN 45.00 Work Without Permit? 0 Yes (j) No 0.00 Travel Documentation Fee: ITRAVDOC 48.00 Strom Motion Fee: IBSEISMICO 4.76 Select an Administrative Item Bldg Stds Commission Fee: 1BCBSC 1.00 SUBTOTALS: 325.76 0.00 TOTAL FEE: 325.76 Revised: 01/06/2015 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (CERSID: 10344415) Facility Information Accepted Apr 3, 2018 Submitted on 3/30/2018 7:41:50 AM by Chris Wiley of The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (Akron, Oh) Submittal was Accepted on 4/3/2018 8:49:37 AM by Yoni Fajardo Comments by regulator: Accepted as administratively complete. A technical review may be conducted subsequently as part of your next facility inspection. Business Activities• Business Owner/Operator Identification• Hazardous Materials Inventory Accepted Apr 17, 2018 Submitted on 3/30/2018 7:41:50 AM by Chris Wiley of The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (Akron, Oh) Submittal was Accepted on 4/17/2018 7:55:39 AM by Lorenzo Perez Hazardous Material Inventory (5)• Site Map (Official Use Only) Annotated Site Map (Official Use Only) (Web graphic, 258KB)◦ • Emergency Response and Training Plans Accepted Apr 17, 2018 Submitted on 3/30/2018 7:41:50 AM by Chris Wiley of The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (Akron, Oh) Submittal was Accepted on 4/17/2018 7:55:46 AM by Lorenzo Perez Emergency Response/Contingency Plan Emergency Response/Contingency Plan (Adobe PDF, 185KB)◦ • Employee Training Plan Employee Training Plan (MS Excel, 20KB)◦ • California Environmental ReporƟng System (CERS)SubmiƩal Summary Printed on 7/30/2018 11:07 AM Site IdenƟĮcaƟon GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 10931 N DE ANZA BL CUPERTINO, CA 95014 CERS ID 10344415 CAL000013487 EPA ID Number County Santa Clara Hazardous Materials Does your facility have on site (for any purpose) at any one Ɵme, hazardous materials at or above 55 gallons for liquids, 500 pounds for solids, or 200 cubic feet for compressed gases (include liquids in ASTs and USTs); or is regulated under more restricƟve inventory local reporƟng requirements (shown below if present); or the applicable Federal threshold quanƟty for an extremely hazardous substance speciĮed in 40 CFR Part 355, Appendix A or B; or handle radiological materials in quanƟƟes for which an emergency plan is required pursuant to 10 CFR Parts 30, 40 or 70? Yes Underground Storage Tank(s) (UST) Does your facility own or operate underground storage tanks? No Hazardous Waste Is your facility a Hazardous Waste Generator?Yes NoDoes your facility treat hazardous waste on-site? NoIs your facility's treatment subject to Įnancial assurance requirements (for Permit by Rule and CondiƟonal AuthorizaƟon)? NoDoes your facility consolidate hazardous waste generated at a remote site? NoDoes your facility need to report the closure/removal of a tank that was classiĮed as hazardous waste and cleaned on-site? NoDoes your facility generate in any single calendar month 1,000 kilograms (kg) (2,200 pounds) or more of federal RCRA hazardous waste, or generate in any single calendar month, or accumulate at any Ɵme, 1 kg (2.2 pounds) of RCRA acute hazardous waste; or generate or accumulate at any Ɵme more than 100 kg (220 pounds) of spill cleanup materials contaminated with RCRA acute hazardous waste. NoIs your facility a Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) CollecƟon site? Excluded and/or Exempted Materials Does your facility recycle more than 100 kg/month of excluded or exempted recyclable materials (per HSC 25143.2)? No NoDoes your facility own or operate ASTs above these thresholds? Store greater than 1,320 gallons of petroleum products (new or used) in aboveground tanks or containers. NoDoes your facility have Regulated Substances stored onsite in quanƟƟes greater than the threshold quanƟƟes established by the California Accidental Release prevenƟon Program (CalARP)? AddiƟonal InformaƟon No addiƟonal comments provided. SubmiƩal Status SubmiƩal was Accepted ; Processed on 4/3/2018 by Yoni Fajardo for Santa Clara County Environmental Health Comments by regulator: Accepted as administraƟvely complete. A technical review may be conducted subsequently as part of your next facility inspecƟon. SubmiƩed on 3/30/2018 by Chris Wiley of The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (Akron, Oh) California Environmental ReporƟng System (CERS)Business AcƟviƟes Printed on 7/30/2018 11:07 AM Facility/Site Mailing Address 10931 N DE ANZA BL CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Primary Emergency Contact Store Manager (408) 255-2166 (408) 963-9725 Pager Number24-Hour Phone Title Business Phone Jim Walker Facility/Site GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 10931 N DE ANZA BL CUPERTINO, CA 95014 CERS ID 10344415 IdenƟĮcaƟon Operator Phone Dun & Bradstreet Beginning Date Business Phone SIC Code Business Fax Primary NAICS(408) 255-2166(408) 255-2166 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO Ending Date 811117538004467924 Owner GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (330) 796-7202 200 InnovaƟon Way Akron, OH 44316 Secondary Emergency Contact Service Manager (408) 255-2166 (408) 903-6256 Pager Number24-Hour Phone Title Business Phone Albert Espinoza Billing Contact Adam RiƩer (330) 796-7860 200 InnovaƟon Way, Dept 704 Akron, OH 44316 adam_riƩer@goodyear.com Environmental Contact Anthony DeSanto (330) 796-2490 200 InnovaƟon Way, Dept 704 Akron, OH 44316 anthony_desanto@goodyear.com EHS Manager Chris Wiley Document Preparer AddiƟonal InformaƟon Signer Title Anthony DeSanto Name of Signer Locally-collected Fields Some or all of the following Įelds may be required by your local regulator(s). Property Owner JOHN T VIDOVICH MARY JANE VIDOVICH Phone Mailing Address Sunnyvale, CA 94087 Assessor Parcel Number (APN) Number of Employees 10 Facility ID SubmiƩal Status SubmiƩal was Accepted ; Processed on 4/3/2018 by Yoni Fajardo for Santa Clara County Environmental Health Comments by regulator: Accepted as administraƟvely complete. A technical review may be conducted subsequently as part of your next facility inspecƟon. SubmiƩed on 3/30/2018 by Chris Wiley of The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company (Akron, Oh) California Environmental ReporƟng System (CERS)Business Owner Operator Printed on 7/30/2018 11:07 AM Hazardous Materials And Wastes Inventory Matrix Report CERS ID 10344415 Facility ID Chemical LocaƟon Bay 8 Status CERS Business/Org.The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company Facility Name GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 10931 N DE ANZA BL, CUPERTINO 95014 SubmiƩed on 3/30/2018 7:41 AM Federal Hazard Categories % Wt CAS No.Common Name Component NameDOT Code/Fire Haz. Class EHS Hazardous Components (For mixture only) Largest Cont. Avg. DailyMax. DailyUnit QuanƟƟes Annual Waste Amount CAS No AutomaƟc Transmission Fluid Days on Site: 365 3555100 Liquid Storage Container Gallons Steel Drum Temperature PressueState Type 0 Waste Code Printed on 7/30/2018 11:07 AM Page 1 of 4 Hazardous Materials And Wastes Inventory Matrix Report CERS ID 10344415 Facility ID Chemical LocaƟon Outside Parking Lot Status CERS Business/Org.The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company Facility Name GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 10931 N DE ANZA BL, CUPERTINO 95014 SubmiƩed on 3/30/2018 7:41 AM Federal Hazard Categories % Wt CAS No.Common Name Component NameDOT Code/Fire Haz. Class EHS Hazardous Components (For mixture only) Largest Cont. Avg. DailyMax. DailyUnit QuanƟƟes Annual Waste Amount CombusƟble Liquid, Class III-B 70514-12-4 CAS No Used lubricaƟng oils Mixture Days on Site: 365 150245245 Liquid Storage Container Gallons Ambient Ambient Tank Inside Building Temperature PressueState Type 1600 Waste Code 221 Printed on 7/30/2018 11:07 AM Page 2 of 4 Hazardous Materials And Wastes Inventory Matrix Report CERS ID 10344415 Facility ID Chemical LocaƟon Shop Area Status CERS Business/Org.The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company Facility Name GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 10931 N DE ANZA BL, CUPERTINO 95014 SubmiƩed on 3/30/2018 7:41 AM Federal Hazard Categories % Wt CAS No.Common Name Component NameDOT Code/Fire Haz. Class EHS Hazardous Components (For mixture only) Largest Cont. Avg. DailyMax. DailyUnit QuanƟƟes Annual Waste Amount Waste Petroleum Hydrocarbons Mixture100 % NA CAS No Drained Used Oil Filters Mixture Days on Site: 365 150300300 Solid Storage Container Pounds Ambient Ambient Steel Drum Temperature PressueState Type 2500 Waste Code 223 CombusƟble Liquid, Class III-B 107-21-1 CAS No Waste Ethylene Glycol Mixture Days on Site: 365 305555 Liquid Storage Container Gallons Ambient Ambient PlasƟc/Non-metalic Drum Temperature PressueState Type - Health Acute Toxicity 1600 Waste Code Printed on 7/30/2018 11:07 AM Page 3 of 4 Hazardous Materials And Wastes Inventory Matrix Report CERS ID 10344415 Facility ID Chemical LocaƟon Stock room and shop Status CERS Business/Org.The Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company Facility Name GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 10931 N DE ANZA BL, CUPERTINO 95014 SubmiƩed on 3/30/2018 7:41 AM Federal Hazard Categories % Wt CAS No.Common Name Component NameDOT Code/Fire Haz. Class EHS Hazardous Components (For mixture only) Largest Cont. Avg. DailyMax. DailyUnit QuanƟƟes Annual Waste Amount CombusƟble Liquid, Class III-B VARIOUS LUBRICATING BASE OILS 6474X-XX-X85 % ADDITIVE PACKAGE, INCLUDING MIXTURE15 % ZINC ALKYLDITHIOPHOSPHATE 68649-42-32 %CAS No Motor Oil Mixture Days on Site: 365 300245300 Liquid Storage Container Gallons Ambient Ambient Tank Inside Building, Steel Drum Temperature PressueState Type 0 Waste Code 221 Printed on 7/30/2018 11:07 AM Page 4 of 4 *Ok,'I)FrIAH7 Albert Espinoza i Service Manager 91231S 60090ZA9 91¤/LL/* RenitIc 'ElFOood,1ch ContEnental imErErm TIRES (and many more!) 10931 N. De Anza B1vd., CupertIno, CA95014 (408) 255-2166 gsr8773@goodyear.com Fax (408) 255-0721 G*,*"4fvEAm£:1srar Refai :Store Manager 6/0D0Z1& 911,LA/ 7I///rmiinental Kcal&!icMm BFOood,tch [//0//3E[¤3 TIRES (and many- morel) 10931 N. De Anza 81vd., 6upertIno, CA 95014 gsr8773@goodyear.com (408) 255-2166 Fax (408) 255-0721 m J; f ;'.5 Z r 11. 6 R 7, 9I Z %. f: f. p ,r t; ?F. a i:. . , 1 . "·4RNS60@18N lES*j18*# 4 ----- --B Couhty of Santa Clar A*ediIiaff63* 5{? yui*(s6**3> -... 'p.., ;E' .../5 ..i,.- .74--=a_ *,1 VED**6*2 I.S DepnTent ofEnvironmentalHealth 3 if*le661NlT-teARAtCOUNTft79 1i Hazard,ou* Materials Compliance Division,(HMCD) 3WS=-1*flFeT:rOF'ENV IlEALlHe 1 '1555BergenDrive,Suite300, F San Jose, CA 95112-2716 , 4, .".'A - ,1 :::." E</2*E!182 2. (468)91 8-3400 Fax i408) 280r6479 www.EHinf6.org *#*53 16=.Filit2LPaTiMISi #?2#45 ,. -- ,- _, ., *57Sk;·5rfIG·i**4#56984-'--, 3.:,1-'·- .-. :·,,. : -·-.iiPy 0. 29, fi:.4*0 -...,01t+YGTO'-,TH-Y.7:33-.8* YEe.:Rk220iAL&2-8, ... ..UY.W _ ,„ 6ti ·OFFICIAL NOTICEOF INSPECTION FacilItriName:4 €/r /L -r26214- 221olL- 4 14 /i*.site lE4Ay K).L'De AN-4_8Lv O. c,yek/,#6-Contac, Person(s)L 66Nf 11020- 1.5Ft:diE#-6iTIBA' 'M5CY«1!58!IMpEd191 4 k'.:!3MBbN1. >r*-?fl r-/ ,22·tF-,n , ) Inspection·Dater_ r / Employee No.. 4Gh ¤Samples Taken 0 Pholographs Taken Inspection Type ,0 Hamrdous atenals Slorage DR Hazordous Waste Gencrator Haziirdous WasLe Gelierat62 Tyl*-, · 0 HazMa[ 8usiness P[;9'¤.11azWast Tiemd Permit O< 1,000 Kg1mo. 2 1.OO6 K&/mo.¤ Underground Storage Tank IlICaI-ARP C CESQG 'SatellitE»nly· El A/G Storage Tank (SPCC Plan)' ¤Toxic Gas _0 Silver 6nly 0 N/A ViOLATtONS: Codes notcd belo* in th6 "Violation Codes" column represcat specifIc violations of State law and/or local Ordinance. Thes6 e6des Bie defined in the attached Violation Codes document(s). Timegranted ror correction of vioIntions does not prec!ude any enforcement action by this Department or oLher agencies. This facility.may be subject to reinspection at any time.Consent to Inspect Given By: _A-l-- E5fiN*zC Summary of Violations, Notice to Comply, , Violation Codes Observations, and Required Corrective Actions A030 -1l 4I-mu,-< 6 7 4 M '*50/c-e ten43.,i,U5l0eA_ e k31rt .1lO?.UtItttO°0:*, G - tOd £6 u ¥4· 41 ,#*44AM J5 tOe£e. f] - t.4 le.6-12£40 , tj(!i-Z:-dittz 1,2rt:2r,i« 1*u*«· „1) · «tItItitr-%r s6 -4fiQn f 1 64*Q4Et --i34;633 Ht'u tAbL,9 - 5.oc-,1.,-4210-D/Lu*t, 79 4,4O 1uJZZ&ia4'4 19&64V Corrective Actions Taken App\ ikA 1-46elt fo -A·lt -{6tni¥us 1)245{k'CoAtdIzevS . /- +_ 1 3L4<03 -/_i S, oa tf· 8% =-B aC23 -1 «1 -5ecuyed A11 4 DFu*,s . 61 l -To-Fs 62 PaloY 6158 4·Yo rK ':f1*uL uLTOrs*e c®vAt*l4tDi12uis& frD,n 1-3 3 6e - 1 2-: . *ca14.46 4HkeS*j)ov2y (;0iAllUl,94:-,4ou.6: ' i&,-ad' 1165k 'CaiLlAt '(2-*gLp LinTee D&994. bo,aL# 4. -6,4;644 AD* 6kc04vy E*iLA„M46J41kaR*, 6k+,24•u04 * iKet+*, il (>Wu,leS . f pOt 010vuhA 69/01 joy,--AlIviolations]must be correct,#within30·days'of the/in*ection dat6nIess rioted 6therwIse,above. Se2tio-n: 25404.1.2(c)(lf of ' California:Health and Safety Code (HSC) requires that you write a 68ef description of the corrective actions'youhEive taken to :1 bring this facility into compliance and submit it.to HMCD within5'days 6f achieving comp!iance, orwithin 35 days of the inspection; f date, whiSh6ver comes firsL. (Note: Detailed instructions onactions you.mAistkeare printed qnthereverseside of thispage.)Receivedbyz5571'.<0/-71 InspeeLd bF51* &,DaL4_ : , W6r penalty of perjury that this facility has complied with directives specified in this Notice to Comply.Certification Icerti 754%466rSignature ofOwner/Operator Title: 334fY#<. ,dE52.s--4--,2,L.Dae21_/834'j FACILITY SENDS YELLOW COPYTO AGENCY, KEEPS·PINK COPY.0/) . A ,A, HMCD-014 - 1/2 Page,1 of ,3=. Rev/ewed l3Y »._2SM.d.--*,L&*Z,.,UZ6/06 - 3URl:.V xmr Date _._91*611- -V THE OFFIL NOTICE OFINSPECTION EXINED - This Official N6tice of Inspection (NOI) describes lhe'findings made during the inspection, including all violations and any actions that must be taken by the fafility to correct the violations.Al[ violations must becorrected within 30 days of the inspection date'unless' note& otherwise by the i11spector. Within five working days 6f achieving compliance, Or within 35 days of the inspeqtion, whichever comes first,'you must submit a written response which describEs the c6rrective actions y6u have tak6ii or - for those violati6ns which'are imp5ssible'to correct within. 30.days- propose to take ii order to bring.yout. faci!ity·into conipliancc. Where proposed correctjve actions are described, you myst specify, a date.by,which you exD6bi iiach,violation to becorrccted. , After you have'adressed'each violation, complete the certificaiion box locatedat Phebottomof page loftheNOI. Your description of corrective actions taken, aIong wiih your signed certification 6f the NOI and any requiredsupporting documents,will serve as your written response to this Notice to Comply. Your response must bc mailedto Santa Clara County Hazard6us Materials Compli®ce Division(HMCD) al 1555 Berger Drivc, SVite 300; San Jose, CA 95112-27 16. The effestive date of the certification lhat'any violation has been corrected is thc date that it is postmarked. What Does the Information'in Each Column Mean? Violation Code: Codes listed in this column identify specific violations of laws,:regulations, or'codes whichwere obscrved during this inspection. Definitions of Violation Codes ars listed on thc atIached Vio19tjon Codes docymen«s): .. 41 -.9 Summary of Violations, Notice toComply, Observations, and Required Corrective Actions: Information noted in this c6IumB describes the.circumstantesof any vio1alions noted in the first column and describes how the vio!ations may be correcled: Additionally, the inspector may,lIse this space to note any additional observations resulting from the inspection. Corrective Actions Taken: This column on the NOl'has been provided sothat you can note how you have corrected or propose to correct each violation. Where proposed corretive.actions·are described, you must,specify a,dateby which you expect eachviolation to be. corrected: Ifnre space is needed, attach additional pages. Why'Were TwoCopies'of theNotice of InspectionGiven.to Me? . 1 You hav6becn given.two copies so you will have a copy for j'our own records after you·submiLyour.written response to HMCD. Do not separate thesOpies,untii you have described all of your corrective actions and signed the certification box on,page 1.The'yelloiv copy ofeachpagemustbereturned.toHMCD. Thepink copyisforyour records. What if I Disagree With·a,Violation Noted on the Notice of Inspection? Ifyou disagfEe with any violation.lis[ed' in this NOI, you must submil a wrilten'Notice of Disagreement to HMCD within 30 days of the inspection date. Addtess such nolices to :the attention of the,inspector who cited khe violation. ·In your Noticc of Disagreement,ygu m®explainindetailwhy youbelieve theviolati6n,does notexist. Ifthereis sufficient space, you may use the, "Corrective Actions'Taken", column of,this NOI to dispute violations. What About PhologrBP.hs, eES1nples Ta]isn Durl!]g 1eInspection I f samples,were taken, split samples wilIbe given to you upon request. Since this N01 was prepared and given to.you at the endofthe'inspecti9n. any photographs and\sampling or laboratory results associated·with the inspection were not yet avaiiable. A tody' of'anypHotographs and/oranalylica! results from samplihg taken during this inspection,will be i*ovided. to.you up6n *ritten requpst. 0ther pertinentinformation' derived from the inspeclion,is attach6d t6 this,NOI. Photogra-phs andam-ple 6sullS inay bewithheld in the eveRt of a c;iiiiniI investigation or other 6iigoing investigation. ******* 0 Per HSC §§25187.8(b) and 25404.1.2(c), failure to sign the certification on this Notice to Comply and returnit to HMCD is a violation of State iaw. ° Per HSC §25404.1.2(c)(2), afaIse statement that compliance has been achieved is a misdenieanor. ° Per HSC §25191(b), a false statementthat hazardous waste compliance has been achieved is a violation ofiState law punishable by a fine of not less than $2,000 or more than $25,000 and/or imprisonment in the county jail for up to one year. ° Per HSC §§25299(a)(8) and (b)(7), a fa!se statement that'underground storage tank compliance has been achieved is a violation of State law punishable by a fine of not less than $500 or more than $5,000. °' Per HSC §§25187.8(i), HMCD has the right to requife the submittal of reasonable and necessary documentation'in support of any'claim of compliance made by yoOr.facility. HMCD414 - 2/2 www.EHinfo.org Rev.07/26/06 Co4nty of Santa Clar En/ironmenta[Resources Agency Department of Environmental Hea[th, Hazardous Materials Comp[iance Division -, . . -rr-1.-f 1555 BeenDtive,·Suite 309 " € 11- 6 /* SafMope,CA 9511222716 ' '(408)918-3400 ' Fax (408) 280-6479 www.EHinfo.org OFFICIAL NOTICEOF INSPECTION b . 7 . rJ-)09(\ 1)1+7jIN L)f·51 7 : - f . 1 : 'i (C9ntInVation-Bage) ,,r, ' Facility,Name: <5*}A646(ks/71i*S*.6As4 .601. " 0. J .InspectionDate: 2/2*k . > ]U(16 .Jf,·:f .9144Ct' 4,9,Ed· de21' ,1 Sumaff-of Vit,l4tions, Notice to 1plY,Corrective Actions , /ViD[.tion . .- . - .,.. ',. Codes Observations, and'Requiride6rrec6ve Actions All ,r¥- 7aken 09 // 1 (*6it-2- 1 +e €«h,4...4E-61 w#+ u,,4,2x«et(cLr - 711293r4..22x,*Di4259*,.5 ,.,-ne,S6/4'W42 014 1,49.-401*6e6100Ey, 1iStAGh21*01 ' ' CL60641 44zlk W.u u 4,-t* ,2 'A gL© 6/&.I4e'dib0fj56**Vii;B]] .-. ' U'lI*c**st+*CVUr-::*4i***o*h*16*t144 -*yL J JuU**iN4 A-Q/U-M : 44fF : :5iI,]F,- 2,., ,--- ,-»F 2,]gAi!j{j]5bj 25 19 WA 0 241.6 66in12iuA64 06(1*49*£9uQi*%*A*jA4.430*ZA*fS 0,un,t0ftA a»- * r**u*e+ 9b 6-puh0S*4'_i8DY;@stf41{j** ©4K, u 3d -Q_ Uft *a@D. 11*8474 6L©<1Lf *.,CE44AkKAeA**A-'2 (7bJUzJ 2*cZ2,uu<«1 r#)A0f492 4JC6iord,@fU :* 09/0Sk*:6r39£) 96v*AeZL(O4c<1zd#*idi .,./-v„v.. 1, 9'I: 3,Ci*JUiA:SE.1464za.,0.9 . 164 ,0t* _ ,7k41ifiA#=i*;A41(61$ZiBliti11 . i- fit3fi f ·.i*iAUD+',i. * 6u-6|UkL NUe'l , W/j1j;*j0';,{SSI*1M.6521 RUNf -2/u+t41 LUOt<"AAa.kA&14464.,t24'12,*41#rrOU 0,Mi:t6ia**S .. .3 .p/:Urp«..5. Do./.r.-'.:/2,4.6*twip/;1ff · : -5rL -Qo-cIA eAkA.#feAiR- * *aL-*RLa A-1&5 6Ai*i6kii;*164.-2118Af.546-- <tly 441*& lA*,Ar (*f*fAz*ls 1%iwi-;latIo%6*uJ,Sudi .d60·o snj940* tE{03.-i....21Vt*X...<:f*iMf5Bjf' a5lb 4pA- 6.-6c,<sRe 8i /. inicA z4-cd kr6fh,ue m t6ii,iR**f*·sS{*41&9$, 4LAW „k64&4%6iM t.t )71461k 7SU54#ZeLLM- A, i#*W,f r;IL.i'301)2AiiM,'B,%-,,T,,// 49-3rrh - Z#;;19; SiA-A44,, _n·-- HY}6JUQU*2{#042*6(&*) -1)4 a- fAt<441diR*) E1144UK/'3684U*LImM6vB2TA-0 Cx5f3 (0ed€ 6t (Wrw,li5*4%&k9 £6 a tEnAl* bQk1huJrD 0 -7- MLo*e d*.645pek:150As%,i ,:4.44*fS. *71061*uy4i46';/ %1·E--4*62/ -'so.* 'Avs/efu& ls - 11L ''ibi k+·.:i E94W44*3<U{,-SV,':):,2.*?iA: f ,iV444*46rd7*kIA-AA:Ufii/<**d,*.'1 . .4.- ni.d,L€Tr,Ti,. ' Scme-Ef - '"' tJ64&fa'- h --"TrJ1':'L . C k. 0 1· 4k 1/40 LL3i(12 6 97/4/ *4Le 4k# C»U W4 Received by:Of-3:*71 Inspected FACILITY SENDS YELLY TO AGENCY, KEEPS PINK COPY. HMCD-015 - 1/1 Page 2-- 0, 3 . 2054 REV 11/01 Rev. 11/19/01 4, ii. 1.t 1, 1.- =. .1-.. ./ I- Coanty of Santa Clarl , . 24er E6ronmentaIResources Agency (408) 918-3400 - Fax683 280-6479Departmentof Environmental Health *ww.EHinfo.6rgHazardous Materials Compliance Division 0FFICIAL NOTICt6 1RSPEtTIO* ,I - ...1- , . .,aage), Z i - . .. : , T{,,.4f'll .39.. .:3,>.....1:9 Id4ectio-n Daie: 1 8>48/51'_'- v 41: :· .Facility Name: (36#,m -f*,*¥ 6,.-Fjp,94 ed¢/_ -_ . .. -Sui,116&f V%14ti9nsJ134-s to\iZ9@W, 5 Corrective Actions - 3 I ViDIalion 4 Codes Observations,'and Required Corrective Actions Taken 6*6 8,bs-.u-cQ (21)$*70'5 ,a.i _ t4QS/0EFfE*«51*/",2„tijitI!1(thRiaZ * 55 -a. 916,L E,r-:,;4*n,alta5miW#E*@tIf*/18/6A TE*&(4ft& /'Ll 96.9 8-1* 26 147 e 7lk a - 2*i9tatrFAF142m,2..... UEk 4Ae u»eAsO;_ 64,4. *.54 ,4 y#f**542;j*]e6*1*-4 - aS 96 -·46,dlz» u,&4A4 r·UDS -3*k/*365%MES]E]fUff]EN;j]1 - A,r,i.-=£----i-:1iti ='-"r',',SD;:; fI.ilI*2dt{ {iILi ..„.1 .iM 46 5OS*2€44t. e.&14 ,14us_km,e.4az4USj**f****jff* 3 O1/L •€,4' 40 iL 4%1 *t1iU& ACoLl#O1- /':--*z*IE4]j*]9]jiYli9Pj11]]....].2EE-ij51)V 1 --'p f .1fEliN9ii21*142jilI2iE)5iE41129iAtii**t! rii- ,:miified)*tAl.4,54*#tri*{j.1,-. 4& viSp,;· ,. -1L i €4AhL 1 494 -1SM:,1/f,-... --_6Ad·„8,4-.·.,.y „*BL'5 1L ».4- i',:f -R#-UZ*Uf'»'t5 ' ';9tZ*;£6,e;· : E5'1%**'V.**GZ0iA21 ·i - A..1i*s** 4DV (664)$1D 44*2.r75 9O1 0,-4 43ed.5-*i/1ai*-,74rPOth89L4·froA,2 1 1eD,ki)Grfi 1:fi:, ' Dp'i4 ,tAaMIT I>f?,}/ld>/,5725MR34WWRT**mY. i- 7- ' .r.jelY - ,PmB»:*»*. L-RiI -,I;;MISS%Wd- -7;..'ir8Ff*FR?KET St..P*;;74 t ' 6414ff35/f**FigR:.1frt- ,/..iden**•·»... , '*i:'..;i,.t:,¢:„'.SM18*0U3mE*# ', L .... 1 - . .a44 i*>.Li&I& /1 5®BREE]fSf41:'f*]f*j»\ /'h * .rI - i - - .,.. {jF*S,*2i3rt ..TH.1tSjiL Et*9mi.,"E*8}]*' . 81:1frf1.r.rf?Fi!lUiGplt*,91]flE:,3:,9,.3Jj41 i3lf¢%i89;kNi'jiA*j5,2..]]*{t5ff...: .- i ,4 r!-,:tOii,,. eC=;H-.,C,4 QI ..fiLIBlItA!]f,42yr,,T:#.:-u.,:i ,A:,1, „ . .5.3rfr**'·.4/CAzATIfTift95ks4,4i Inspected byBL¢3€* "*11 Received by =4/»r«.. FACILITY SENDSYELLOW COPY TO AGENCY, KEEPS P[NK COPY. 2054 REV 11/01HMCD-015-1/1 - page 3 of -3 Rev. 11/19/01 -4, ,31 County of Santa Clare® Departm6nt of Environmental Hea!th Hazardous Materials Compliance Division (HMCD) 1555Berger Drivd, Suit6.300 San Jose, CA 95112-2716 (408)918-3400 'Fax(408) 280-6479 www.EHinfo.org A*6hdiu+A1D» - R0bBl3934'ifF.-i*fS*1jf33iI£Z -,In-lii:Ju746:41,5r-d1IlL- 1 t.,%.·-v &dII.h. f*ZAt#,4 *rI111,*5*& _83£1,.5f X2&: C-6On .14tIMP .t* "t¢m-iN# 55eiI**ZER %89&,f*SM; iiJt*1FFEt*· 1mt-i!*f£@*K OFFICIAL NOTICE ()F INSPECTION Facilily*Iame:(%-he04 42.zA -nO * K*--10 6k da.Site Ad89 *f w. .De kIN;,; 43Lv/D· Ci10et+4,ConlactPerson(s): A . Inspection Type:AL E55 i N6261- Ha78rdous atinals Storage 61 HazMal Business Plan m Underground St6riige Tank ¤ A/G'Storage Tank (SPCC PIan) Hazardous WasIdGencrator C iiaLWaste Tiered Permit C Cal-ARP. C Toxic Gas tA*Ff50%3 'YiUy@¥irVa ;W,'-2fe*6Me .e.r4iJ:V-·.*= ..; 19*111711IliI*f:ffIR ii0ir48ErEAefiR-11 BMl:gliEi42<iiA511rcr95 *#fc/- 1729JnBi»11rl, 11rtii;fti31i19*41 EaPt*!..1:1 1rf-7MliA*§19** kY&E!*„4#45 ©*01*<49'40-P_jilfl'*tfT..4 Inspection Datm-_1 ./pS/r Employee No'r t. i- ¤ S6mples Taken ¤ Pholographs Takcn Hazardous Wate GEneEntor Type 0·< 1.600 Kg.>mo.,,, 2 1.000 Kg./mo. 21'CESQG ¤1 Satellite Oic[y Silver Only ¤'N/A VIOLATIONS: Codes noted below in the "Violation Codes" column represent speeific viBlations of State law and/or local Ordinance. These codes are denned in the: atiached Violation Codesdocument(s).·· 1'ime granted for corriction of violotions does not preclude any enforce,ne,11 -action bythis 1)epirtrhentor 6ther agenEies. This facility rnay be subject to reinspection at any time.Cons(int to Inspect GivenBy: rl - 1 NlD-ze Corrective Actions , Takin Summary of Violations, Notice to Comply, VioIalion Codes Observations, and Required Corrective Actions gd3O -1lu-<EDUR4kR. 1u-zUUu6 Bl*A+e'te-*»( 5lA_>€4 2 wpt oA.k 6Lo*D : £0 6 -, 1UdANg t1·41\ 141,4 5 4#44*.8tdAA i ij42LiAA lel ,1Qe,Q 4 4 - sT- apEt.< Ddlk Ce(,264- ba4r 1,4d>6481utA a·t 4LN«,- - d2y yLe (a.'100, Per£° taz? fer,S I77U,- lA4><She O7'ac93 003044446£ 656+Q2k1 1-91k,te ce*44Lf al°-9' C*ujUu-e/fLe;Le-uU$ t3iVALL% yfr(6101 +B·9 -1 4bdX Le**e 600tS4.24-.M -....ill'A(1 \1LE.412 .t/ \IUW#u&C DLu-.uSL AL- th, : i'.f All,violations must bii correct/within 30 days of,the'inspection dat€0nless noted otherwise,, above. Seetion 25404.1.2(c)(1) ofCalifornia Hea!th andSafety Code {HSC) requires that you -write a bnef description of (he corrective actions you have taken, to bring this facility into dompliance and submit'it to HMCD within 5 days of achieving compliance, or within 35 days of the inspection date, whichever comes first. (Note: Detailed instructionsonactions you musUake are printed on therevErseside 6fthispag-e.) * Ains,x:cted bI *69- 'Eniercd by: -__u££0--- AuJuReceived by7< L*.7rl, -*6 -7/9,/35Sr ' »Certification: I.certi6d6r penalty of perjury that thisfacility has complied with directives specified in thi5 Notice to Comply. Signature of 0wner/Operafor: -Date: / /Title: FACILITY SENDS YE!:LOW COPYTO AGENCY,·KEEPS PINK COPy. HMCD-014 - ]/2 page 1 or .3 · /--5,H Rev.07/26/06-4J 21)URl.V 11/06 THE OFFL NOTICE OF INSPECTION EX*INED ThiA Official.NoLice of Inspection (NOI) describes the findings made during the inspection: including all violations.and any)actions thal must be taken by the facility 16 correct lhe violations. All violations must be corrected wiihin 30 da¥sof the,inspection date unless noted otherwise bythe inspector. WiLlin five working days 61''achie¥ing compliance. or'within 35 days of the inspection. whichever· comes.first. you inust"submit a wPitten r2sbonse Which describes the corredtiVe actions y6u ha96 taken or - for th680,viciliti6ns which areimpossible tocorrEct.within 30 days - propose to take in order lo bring y6ur facility'into compli6nce. Where proposed correctiveactions are described, you'must specify a date by which you exped'each violation to,be corrected. Aftcr you have.addressedeach yio1alion. complete the certification box located at the bottom of page 1ofthe NOI. Your description of.corrective actions taken, along withyour signed certification of the NOI and any required supporting documents, will serve as your Written response to this Notice to Comp!y. Your response mus[,be mailed to Santa Clara County H9zardous Materials Compliance'I3ivision (HMCD)at 1555Berger Drive. Suite30(k San J6se. CA 95 1 1 2-27 16. The effective date of the dertificition,lIat any violation has been corteeted is the date that ir is·postmarked. What Does the Informationin Each Column Mean? Violation Code: Codes listed in this.column identi fy specific violations of. 1aws. regulations. or codes which were observed duing &his inspection. Definitions of Violation Codes are liwed-ontheatiached Violation Codesdocument(s). Summary of Violations, Notice to Comply, Observations, and Required CorrectiVe Actions:, Iriformation noted in Ihis eolumn describes'the circumstances 01'any violations noted ifi th2 first colukin-,aId destribes how the-violation.i niay.be c61rected. Additionally, the inspector.may use this space,to note any additional observations resulting.from'the inspection. Corrective Actions TakEn: This column on the.NOl has been provided so thayou fannote how you have corrEcted or propose to correct each vio16tion. Wherc p.roposed corrective actions are described, you must specify a date by,wh'ich you expect each vioIatign to becorrecied.. I f morespaccisneeded,attach additional pages. Why, Were Two Copies of.the Noticeof Inspection Given to Me? 'You have,been'given twO.cOpiess0you will have ·a·copy,for your,own records after you submit your wrilten response to HMCD. Do not separate the copies until you have described all of your corrective actions and signed the certification box on page 1.Theyellowcopy ofeachpagemustbereturned t9HMCD.Thepink copyisforyour records. What if I,Disagree With a Violation Noted on theNotice of Inspection? Ifjou disagred withany violation li6ted'in this NOI, you muslsubmit a written Notice of. Disagreement to HMCD within 30 days of the inspection daLc. A8dress such notiCes·iO 9he atteniion of the ihspector who cited.lhe violation. In your Notice'of Disagreement, you must explain in detail why you believe the violation does not exist. II' there is sufficjent 4pace, you may usc tlie "Corrective Actions,Taken" column'ofthis NOI'to dispute violations. What About.Photographs or Samples Taken During the Inspection? 1fsamples were taken, split samples·wilI be given70·you upon request. Since this N01.was prepared and given to you a[ the epd of the inspecIion. any photographs and sampling or lab6ratory resdIts ass()ciated wilh the inspection were'nol yet available,: A d21py of any photographs and/gr analytical results from sampljng taken during this'.insp6ction wil[ be provided to you· upon written request. 0ther perlinent information derihed from *c inspection is atiached to this N01. Photographs and sarnple.resulls inay be withheld in the event of,a'criminal investigation or.other ongoing investigation. ******I ° Per HSC §§25187.8(b) and25404.1.2(c), failure to sign the 5ertificationon this Notice to Comply'and«return it to HMCD is a violation of State law. ° Per HSC §25404.1.2(c)(2), a faIse statement that comp!iance has been achieved is a misdemeanor. ° Per HSC §25191(b), a faIse statement that haiatd6us whste compliance has been achieved' is a violation of State law punishable by'a fine of not less than $2,000 or more than $25,000 and/or imprisonment in the county jail for up to one year. ° Per HSC §§25299(a)(8)and ·(b)(7), a faIse statement that underground storage tank compliance has b«en achieved is a violation of State law punishable by a fine of not less than $500 or more than $5,000. ° Per HSC §§25187.8(i), HMCD hasthe right'to require thesubmittal of reasonable and negessary documentation in support of any claim of compliance made by your facility. HMCD-014 - 2/2 www.EHinfo.org Rev. 07/26/06 County.of Santa Clar= Environmental Resources Agency- Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Compliance Division Facility Name: 1555 Berger. Drive, Suite 300an Jose, CA 95112-2716 (408) 918-3400 Fax (408) 280-6479 www.EHinfo.org OFFICIAL NOTICE OF INSPECTION (ContinuationPage) 7UP*/UE*- U„Inspection Date: 22f8 Summary of Violations, Notice to Comply, Violation Codes Observations, and Required Corrective Actions 6ll-2- 1 -far eFAK«¢M4 .97 u.7af A- ,*,£Chz6* 40u-1.0-,44*4-* DY-61UJ;b1-244 4AGi319- 21«»k,>*f=*Lb BL=rin6dk) 5694 A.4 Z#<06dc.C<) 64 Ult V62#96-2 9L4#-4 4 08621 94 22 #SzUeu u.d<e hl_ 9240 4<rL-4 c*£e- us1 60.0 5\16316 4U- ubod{(e bitNIS.u61 625' Ar6ttu4 N*44 a*«*1$0.2:3tfiltite:iC«-A 6- 0 *CVt' 11 Mt#u kHa·u141- U¥r&.668*444424# &iS* A3fn'+9(243 (2&517 (**+ tuLsAUdUt(* 1ln 1e44« fit ';t*D6aCC5Y0 - *IAR*-fQn-0>4 -i X1., a. _ -A r.6 9 4PJ4dbA&9 *0 3rr 4 44 4Le 4-A W 54¢*16 w-v11»* 614 42*k 4, CtIAWaZ4A K84 $F11 Received by:D*/\- FACILITY SENDS YE HMCD·015 - 1/1 2064 REV 11*01 Corrective Actions - 41Taken E*®*82EYfS158*1ER@ ]8SiE55f53fm.-ft{¢S8fi{i%,ffS , -7.4Ii.%H:•73»,·„-'„ it:--a:T,:yi,"25£-72 - •": •,4;564,F-_3ill»%,r,.rsf*Ed31 ·· . *11U*i:{0*I.,Mij*5SiREfS6 , ili-:,11 14*1:&7.:„i,'1jr ,.,:rrT,;rir.1 4„%' ,T --.r -319.L:tiRt.K*',·6::sliElIx,41'JIfUSii369 , .* E:_22fF*lE{1-....lE*irRIE8 - " t?#9S1858.:flE74»9it;.1477Ft:EtfiVe *I,4_„-:, ,282S,3.4 „ ,.-9,,0PR:.'J11· .*.mo,',3Mjdj,r'Hi]'u , - , .· j-· · f:L:1rlY:p#1XS:Wt' •d,:-50-..,-.-. «s*50*6fF*fliMP,.",,i *' ' ."- 4['·, 1rT, 464.r,TJIt51;1:4:5HlI;:1Zt 4,·11.r. ..,'* ..--. - ,:-1·.&1rS.1;Z:...·gi'f=Zt;r:+u-p:"tB:,ii::t·i"*Wi: ,- ·.Sit..&m- '-"ne"*16+Ki;*9241*e: YE,f11£6fIrr5TlE:hi8Ni]{5]26{ies ]M]i] 9t ' ES3*5253%E%%5ZfUm:1 ',j**5***iF.--.-fek! ·, Sf%**4fS*@E%St.{f* i ,, r*{,-.,'.*4:55%*}-f . rr , .·i .1 „„* ·»9fef : M:le, ,CUl..- ...31 , .i/,4 i i ·TkiT. : n.„ i„i „„4; 5 n j!3 6-S L.//, / ,2 4% i.l /. i1lS;%%*)E}.IMEONf4$*i*562 ,< l*%9mNi1mmiiAxi.1fr69= . ,;;· .4f '-t . - ·:. t„«-„,.,·enSltm..l:rSial&.zz,:C·uM /3klE*f*%StS*6{*f -f %5S%5}.432ft*----EFFi 1,., j,. . „1 i-;N * 64YITi KI,f ,1,ir, ,£ [1, ' : J*14<&.Jt BtA*..trA..5fR**meR -1ii*Pii. : • ·,F,:d.(I'„'1'4.1IUBS,*YEitUS]iHfSY#*'i]!IE.PJa02*-Lak**-dES=Stz:5hawef L E f ' EM5/1=.11- 7,6.04Ii r 93':1:'; CT- fIll ,--fJT.{,f,3,%u4412-jUR]2!S__tft:iRt:.ii{it4 3.WiR4, r ·73,7-R.+··./.·j tflf,/::--:i:;5·-,7:', 115.1594}Ui•*-'4./' 4:Yj]R}{2.4,..3,2i{}f!*{tSS21Mlf]1] iN**93}5.vE]{1195fS*18{28if, Inspected 0PY TO AGENCY, KEEPSPINK COPY. P.ge Z' or 3.R/v. 11/19/01 1 / County'of Santa Clars® Environmental Resources Agency Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Compliance Division 555 Berger.Drive,Suite 300an·Jose, CA 95112-2716 (408)9183400 Fax (468) 280-64l79 www.EHinfo.org 0FFICIAL NOTICE OF INSPECTI6N (Continuation Page) Facility·Name :6;e,*/0,.4. 77£ * A.,.6dK6. Ins Summary.of Violations, Notice to Comply, Vio1alion Codes Observations, and Required Corrective Actions 6466 6bV9& Gl) $49¢cL 5-90·6 681aaIt¢„t*7Ch*%4* U4 55 -*01*- un;da*raB9 3LU*C5 614 V&.O 81* i££9 5*74€ 67-LI-a. Ugpf-96 9AL e,eAzOiL- 648£. £'PM.Q , vOlLo 6znM(kA.4 1ld),4.365 b_.96uA.»e 9Le ··6 U46«/16 40u¥6- ArSZ I%;E%'dt132tltZZZl«. 1Yt- *sWv .GA 4EArbO *U+4- 06/.2 +88/4./54@.IP( 6412 43) /(6 4?-kO-* dU'0 4; t·Ad- C-3)*,0#€4jAA' 24Lo stk*J U+L4 u+41df (')-1«A- .*4 6 t2SZt%I tLl7166 4 rev ta64)xlD CmrA-4biN74UU,4\44 0*tA- i.J4prOa 4 1*ae- DIllU DV%.IJ . C pection Date: 8,65,2 Corrective Actions Taken ·»%5>:_a·. „2::1:-r-11G*i5hF f;E5 0.tii.£6644£4 /64ii*5ij&ji;174,kI 94'..',. ,' i:*vufjSi51;: IS*f55if;L A,-- .1,.,.· ,n_ „iLI96.L-.,r.i- 5f4f'1.J,jNS6:2, '111 A..i*,f* 4/-14| '4EP'KI|teAS/52! ,:· 6 df r.,0iS',.: 263,::,4227...1 71:fr40 25- -649&6Sjlf* _1:_'i 7 4,2,iSiRaj'24:' 5:4i3It311ii3ijf. TEj*,Sm.,5 6..,14t2. ·,'·21PJM'.,i6 .,:'·akt:tY!lIGAtUME'Re)/.fi 'rAtja7i..*Ej8]Eli9li 2. 4 G. ',7.31'-·z- ,C4,-==/.;2.;-..R*,n.- -s'. · fr- s·. ,:As · ..,gd,,fir468*3i?2 2-paid- -9 -tA.1 ···'§22;10,rt5:*201-3El1Efimm-_ -1-Z.....Y,.5,2/94..J. if',-EN93EiV.. *Cf]51fj3i'E!,;f*{iFS_1 A%'S=_5*)i,:tiff.:ft)i3]iZf] ..24'. fElA25'tUlp- fL-j*sif-&#14•-._·2 6": =5r''t:f·YA-4ft, -i::-;.€::R@!46=244 1f4*42STA42·'rm:%mALi 2,1ik. ] 23%2*5**61* 24%1fSSjY:5511=...*.Ii*U, 1Si7fR.29 .....,LifiS*if6 Ff{ ]3fi'f >':)419Mp9418,39*pF2'.5Ss-a;t21#91>,--·::-*SEL*lI&81. *j88*-8,-S]Cli126-14>*' Z,Wdr.)i·;•:.::,· =iKI " "'····k'.%*410: '33.'i18<442{-, 5F *2i ·Z-:*.*18Sj: .wER_<.452.i),'': 3.--. 6ftS::..41 --' 37!;43 - .-i-K-rflI-n·" Received byCd afr*7 1 Inspected byU*u**? FACILlTY S£NDS YELLOW COPY TO AGENCY, KEEPS P!NK COPY 2054REV11/01 HMCD415 - 1/1 page 3 or -2 Rev. 11/19/01 . J County of Santa Clar/. Department of Environmental Hea!th Hazardous Materials Compliance bivision 2220 Moorpark Avenue P.O. Box 28070 ,SanJpse,CA 95159-8070 ](408) 299-6930 Fax (408) 280-6479 .Progr**Rec9rd ED f4*3*.36&09%r ·21. ..12=.',fr .]fS ..:.../ .4.: i& iS V L*liES&*E 6° 1 - 1 -' r-I-. ?:1.1 .--242ar r,+ s·cl{:F.:ii{:14.:isS 011·-l(-1:\1. N()TI(-1: 0FINAl'I·f'1-1()N tRED.EAR 0 6 2000 .ttlT:..iI..5'...35.3ii- .3-nue»,.:.. ::< ..:./S0j.'.::: - Facility.Name: G,1;,6d*l ,- Site Address:l299/ W. Di #4 6twl Work Area: Contact Person(s):00444 3CALaN4 -JUr£CYll,)APM;A ,Employ6e No.:'46< ·Inspection Type:O Hazardous Maferials ,O Cal-Accidcntal RI: Prevention PFogram-,SampIcs Taken?0Ycs. lS No: - 71 Hazardous'Waste ·0Mcdical Waste Stotage,rn#1ntnt r. 1 Pliotogmphs Taken? ' O Yes,•0 No., 0 Toxic Gas -0 M6dical WaskWEmtor VIOLATIONS: Codes rioted belowidthe Violation Code" column repreent spefIc,vIo!alionsofSEate law and/or local Ordinance. Theaccodes are denned intheattached,Violation Codds document(* 'Time grinted'for correctIa 6fi,i6latiom d6es not prectude any enforcement actIon by thIDepar[ment'or'ther agencies. Tbis facIlity may be sobJect to reinspectionat any time.- *4AF"ird#G..1io66 19jj A+,dJSummary of·Violations, Notice to Comply, nalation Codes Observations,andRequired Corrective Actions -r .1'M(1Olu11<jAi*4l.\ 1/»11/4O -. (AtidZ) . 1.-L001zott w*A 4*4 (h6 j t GW 4 /" N.*A 644 *841i* * MA11*81056 N*$ A -- dmid£j 4 2z ;UplA6 27,06 r* 1 1+0Y wu;tI' taL1 545i d Y41 r 1709-C. :rplL ..4 ujailL W *A*W; od *IL, fin* .*15,0 ,.F. ' (*1O. w*. dIAk,BA Kf 69. 41-/00 , f rvt F,-:e/ Dt*1#.·** 9.NA£;10/Ak9, j.Ab+dU i4W Vfi:.r/e' 2Zlo "894 iNtBIrna.#1 w*£6, *•L 11 N* (0;11$0il .--· wu1Z iil! 4ads · 6f",iA0i9Zm,-(6iI,,4 01tkd- 1u6 , -1: biSt.' 2.2.gR jn*u +0iL;) diS£ 1 4'1162/ 16#641 44#0ye462. 2· . 0„1XU0 • ' *,,4 ,r»( ** *4 A#· C/«wj.' 54 z,v, c,*,;wN*f i B ,l Corrective Actions ' _ Taken 0-:ti: .&12.ff*St.12729 1441,0/Sti.t65 1,S . =*StSH«:Stfj]ft{Sfft .:12, A,5,2 35S3' +.- ':-1. ' = =-1 262 ' All violations must be corrected within 30 days of the inspection date un!ess noted otherwise, above. Section 25187.8 of the·State Health and Safety Code (H&SC) requires that.you write·a brief description of the corrective actions you have taken to bring thisfacility into compliance and submit it to tbis Department within.5 days of achieving'compliance, or within 35 days of the inspectiondats,,Nhicheve comes t-(Nole: Detailed Instructions onactions.you takearep tedonthereversesideofthispage.)d4ZU'*U-·>Received by:· i/Ah.44##>f - -'Inspected by Entered by:A'. eW -Certitic*ton: I certify under penalty orperjurythatthis facility has complied with directives specified.in this Notice,toComply. ..' 3 Date:1 Signature ofOwner/Operator: ·Title:- 'FACILITY SENDS YELLOW COP.Y TO AGENCY, KEEPSPINK COPY. 1 1 Page 1 of 2---.HMCD-014-.1/2 Rev. 11/20/97 At ir, , ..1 - · THE OFIAl NOTICE OF,INSPECTION EAINED . . - This Official Notice-of insRecti6n (Nati66-6f,InsDection)-describes'the'findings made,during th6, inspecti6n, inciudingralI violations andany·actions that must b61aken by #te facilit9.to'correct theviolations,.All violationsmu5tbecorrect*d within 30 days of the , inspection date unless noted oth?rwisebytheinspector: ·- · -·- .., . Withinfive working days of achieving complian6e, or within·35days of.the inspection; wbichever comes first, you must submit a written response which describes the corrective actions you have taken or - for those violations which are impossible to correct within ..30 daysi.: pr6Poie totake in order to bring Yfr facility into compliance. Where proPsed,corrective.actions arede5cribed,y6u mUst:f·sci6$*€by which you'expecte,Eh,Violation to}be c6il;cted. After youhave'addre£sed Jch.vi6lation, complete the certification ':: '656<,186aad'at th6 66*ni·6f:paGIi,of7h»i6iide.6f.6?s;*tio©;Y6uidesSiptioIi·f··2drr66ti#e a6ti66 taken alodg with your signed 4. certification of the.Notice of Inspection and any required suppoMirig documents, will serve as your.written response to the inspection.Your resP9nse must b61pbiled'to theiSanta Clara County Hazardous'Materials Coidpliance Division (HMCD) at P.O. Box 28070, San Jose,-CA 95159-8070. A : - - r'-- -- - What Does the Information,in Each Column Mean?- .1 ' Violation Code: Codes listed in this column'identify specific violations of laws, regulatioh5, 6f codes which were observedduringthis inspection, Definition4 of Violation Codesarelisted ori the attached Violation Codes document(s)! Summary of Vi6Iati6i14'Notice to Coinply, ObseWations, and'Required Corrective Actions: Information noted in thiscolumn descri6es..thJ' circudstances 6f any violations. n*d in the firsi column and.describes how the violatios may be corrected. Additionally; the inspEdor may usethis space t6 note My additi9nal obs6rvations reulting from the inspdction. Corrective Actions Taken: This column onthe Notice.of Inspection.hasbeen provided,so th-at you can.note how you have corTected oFI7opose to corr66< each' violati6n: -Where-proposed corrective actionsare described, you must·specify a.date by which you expect each·violation to be corrected. Ifmore·sliac8 is needed; attach additional pages. Why WeE61Two Copied of the Notide of Inspectioil GiventoMe? You haPe been given two_coPiEs so you will·have a copy for your ownrecords after you submit your written response to HMCD.Do not separate the copies untiI you havedescribed all of your corrective a6tions and signed the certification box on page 1. The yellow copyof each page must be submitted toHMCD. -The·pink copy is foryour records. · What if I Disagree With a Violation Noted on the Notice ofInspection? If y6u disagree with any vio!ation listed in this Notice of Inspection, you must submit a written Notice of Disagreement, within 35 days of the inspection date, to the'inspector who cited the violation. 'Inyour Notice of Disagreem6nt, you must explain in detail why the·violationdoes not exist. If there is suffitient spacel you may use the"Correctiv6 Actions Taken",cOlumn·of this Notice ofInspection to dispute.vi9lations... . , , _ .r/- WhatAbout PhotograpKs'or Samples Taken During the Inspection? .. Since this Notice of Inspectionwas prepaIed and given to you at the end of the· inspection, any photographs and sampling-or -labofatory reBiiIts associ1ited -With th6inspeaion vere-not-y2tavailabl6. A:coby 6f anyphot6graDhs a-tid/or iGia13,tical fesults fr6m sampling taken'during this inspection will be provided to you upon written request. 0ther pertinent information derived'from the inspection is attached to this,Notice of Inspection Photographs and sample results may be withheld in the event of a criminal iriveitigationor-otherongoing investigation. .. - · . Hazardous·Waste Violations .. 1 ° Per. H&SC, Secti6 25187.8(g)(1), faiture' tosIgn theicertification on this Notice<of 'Inspection and ' return' it' to this Department is a violation of State law. ° Per H&SC, Section 25191;-a faise'stAtedent.ihat c6mpliance has been achieve(1.is a'violatiorof State [aiv punishable by a -fine of notiess than $2,000»ormore·than $25,000 and/or imprisonment in the county-jail foruptoone'year.°'P&r H&sC,'secti616 25187.86), itIi6 DeDaPtiAent hai the riht'to acquiBe tii66;ubmittal of reasonAble and n1cessary documentation,in support of any claim of compliance'm,de 8yyour facility. . ' S HMCD-014-2/2 Rev.11/20/97 3 .L County of Santa Clara Department of Environmental Health HA7nrdous Materials Compiiance Division 2220 Moorpark Avenue P.O. Box'28070 SanJose,CA 95159-8070 (408) 299-6930 Fax (408) 280-6479 OFFICIAL NOTICE OF INSPECTION (Continuation Pa-ei 16R 3 1i ,i*8»64. 164Faciiity Name: 0,rn&# T/6 4,AJ*ex G·**ui Inspection Date: 222606-1 - Vio6tion Codes 12/9 '2;z- 81 22.F? SC. 2251 Summary of,Violations, Notice to Comply, Observations,'and Required Corrective Actions Y*44*t V '01nio606 - 10/2,j42 ·,41' 9¥6544 6D- 4%1/; . # 92dP446,/ - */?1 - 8/4 6,795/0,*06fAk&24- 0 0TrO 4 2 30 &04,i - s,r /Jduu- ·vnAt, 4,*89, 0 11- rAd* 1 - 4* la,1.diJ ".1,6duU 7 tAo11O. ' '9' *9A6 -nA--u + tUAJA ,_._'j ([t,*kA 7,1...FutAu,4 .rurrx4 (4,.1 iL) CLiliAlibUJZlE*liM•$41',4*4 M" rL r«n£ 44» ow*+ 4-4*v ..d4 4 41 *L < 44.MulNJA4 V*26. Mulp,Q# 4/46itY rw¥- r*;WiNd ***iM TrAb14 , Corrective Actions Taken 04* 4jW8fgE*Upk 2.2,.8ff*«,f », i:·:*:. E--<'.'..:.94-:..A. ' *.764&'..I :11<'.t.· · G144/ ruKkLd ,y-,GA sT /94 #0,9 r i,t46 7„-1 Mff· .- K/:vA J*U*&/U(*- 45 «F>vt: YE70 »*»38.4>:::4{-*4,U .rui¥la - rg t*1' 1 YfI#-&**S 64 19O - 4DO ¥11 rA V44#11VSFrA60/11 I ZE,, .„3„.1.., I »..f.::f4it»2:Ha,-::St'f*««fS«4 J - f. :-40:f-:>--Efl ·-4i-i >- - , . S -S- 5 -44vs.-..50::: .·t:·5 .«,)·nlii:· S;A·I. ·.S·F-616<'40 8:11,.-;r3.·f rtri ··. 0*.·:9:82-::'.:v::::.4:E:.:;2r-9 ·10:3yIF4tt.' 55>* ,,- .373: ..:2ff. .::.::.*::4. Received bY:'-*f- '14,s--fr-_ Inspected by:dul CAS.Uxz31,AA n LJ FACILInENDS YELLOW COPYTOAGENCY, KEEPS PINK COPY. / ®2064 HMCD-015 Rev. 11/10/97 t:, 1 1 , COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12220 Moorpark Avenue ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AGENCY ,ENTEREO N0V T 4 1997 | SnnJos®, CA95128HAZARDOUS MATERIALS COMPLiANCE DIVISION ,(408).299-6930 ()1·'1''1(.1\1. N()'1'[('E0FIN>1'1<(7N)N 77£8 + A18B EX ea, f)F ARHA AL i EUPtf*nAD ' DBA/Name 6nDl497[1L AddIress lOgal U . Contact Person 9TWe U lMf W 8eRGr Additional Information 0 JIazardous Materia!s )Hazardous Waste 0 Toxic Gas, Facility ID# 3/3 936 Hours Service Code Date 4 44r Work Area6.tion 4/3 Emp#46* Prog/Elem 2 Z>r. PermitExp. Date O Medical Waste Storage & Treatment '0 Medical Waste Generator O Risk Management and Prevention Program 26U * 94zmI / A44 * r**--· rr, zi02 -J 12fz.: 4UbiAL AL *+04 - - -la*L_ _y,:1,LE_ 1, u&aLd, UUA : 4 al LyAa, 1,41£C 11, L4tt4* 6UA : Ix 4r laAf- 41;tS dIfPAir "UiD A' H* 161 wN#_ ' 8Alm/)ws W4slF 4&44 84#K751* WATER*L . - - U**8 "41*es*5 44mF 3 .4*44 0*/t di:Go U#da * 0mfiD* WM% " .4. 4 0t/ 4 4UU/ MAAwn,ak**n rUt »66EED AtiG c01FORiZAr l*44 4ea*£tr -* CAL e6ty< 4At/ A*££t.t. iU16 " Grc,-(m 0 t, 464*, 1mu4,6 - pu.alA*M4j * lAr&kAUG4, fA.h Ai-4 4- N,ZI',4 Received by: 4>' Page· 1 of L_3 MaiBg'Address: HMCD 1/94 264 Inspected by: )2*y- lQ** 9. 7§04, DepL' of Environmental Healt!i Hazardous Materials Compliance Division P.O. B6x 28070 San Jose, CA 95159-8070 Eritered by: white· HMCD ¥eUow - Facilitv pink- Staff CountyofSanta Clara Environmental Res6urces Agency Deparmlent ofEnvironmentatHealth 2220 Moorpark Avenue SanUose. CalIfomia 95128 (408) 29EH3930 FAX (408) 2806479 E HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STORAGE N31iAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR OFFICIAL NOTICE OF INSPECTION 14'7*CuF DATE DBA/NAME 5wi,* 75* 0 /A/ Comments: (see marked violationson page 1) VO t259 : Wa,£G 66, iLAj )Hul; 14- w*UmIL ,0(*441 A ' 4 1**# 6A' /64££4+ U*44 54*4 k Aidu416.64 dJiEg 4-L41I*I6_ . . 6k (1j: »(1#4 1Mn ; 'REd,. (0v>4 -u bU. · - MI,Lo( 4 1„i U·4 . 'Nt v -p.1-, *V9 a*4, . i) ,Wa. d *114 45*w* 4. aLU. 1UA.u w*47 6L U, 1kA* 5 %w6 .446 *4,4 6, .1'»r,.ty Clu+,-.1,- 4 A lkk,L.t10617ti, · 74#1.(u+,5 k lud, 6 66-u,J ck,.0 *4 O*4 -Yr***r» p+*AJ 'UGA, 1dd noY fa6van, ,#js , N90, tAACm* .b,00= ALuAu u214 / -tD ,16lN 42LL f.*A,D7 4, *4LAa*4* -t5 0&.,+.k, t-,u,;1 _ -7# LAu- h& 4 64* W .,6 a 4-£U 4**6'ZI, · - 1/6 214 f- · a14, 44 1*4utE 6r+y, 67V&r4W ,*4Zz* motriduAe+«i[]0 AL f+rv'0*_, au.0. 150-+a*+U yALiZD J* 'l4+t444, *21A.. d£Z:il6,1<0,40 4 1VuLt J* Oluf N*._ 1,1 »U, w. \44*4J 4 y"/ . i_ 041, 1mftI4 - t uU, , 46* + /u*f e.,1 °6 »'4 °6» '·*£c . . Ve zAY : 1AJA4 A 0.54Rw4 vv butA 0(*,un, eL uLt 'L69 4w. , Received by: Inspected by: 2 ./ \. 47 Samples taken? Yes No Photos taken? Yes 10 2645PAGE2REV6/93 Hazardous Ma6frIals ComplIance DWIsion Page ;Lot 3 26 CountyofSanta Clara Environmental Resources Agency pepart,nent of Environmental Healtb 222O,Moorpark Avenue San JoSe.CalifOrrIa95 128 {408) 2996930 FAX (408) 280-6479 HAZARDOUSMATERIALS STORAGE R'HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR OFFICIAL NOTICE OF INSPECTION 00UN7'- 'Yi \1 1//// (21 2Z DATE u / 6 15Y DBA/NAME A*7,1 w T, Le, * AU#+/ Comments:(see marked violationson page 1) -- -- f - H11_ 1LL_ <_Au, r wl*6 -- uCt, 9*41 - 6 i_ o.,Z 44 . 3J A*4ZZ ,* 64uLut 6 ,,2.k*,vAy e**z***10*KE; lf - w*JZ73 -3A hAL k260 n/ pmA, 4 0 67. AU#N CUL, 76UAJ)#- FC, 129O -' ®61'L. 64IA. tU14 44Ve,tLt Mw 156 £4 1£-9EffH / 7'*nALl .64764_ 0 ;u+*Ut Au. e+ NAttLJ&4 : 6NY*t- Att &4AkAh(45 L44*Ri,4 60 aLAy r. 4/; *f*4 *T+UU lAy t-f lAIIi) lAU dUD #*:u*41N 35- 495, _ ,6.6,47 UUAA, CAL) . 16*„mu t#.auGUr : tUaal. 064 u +L uni.pti / ,*A.L# ula .Fi A,vUtO AL *+09 1aaw kki.u L,t ',6lUAl/404 U PiZii -MWS 8-1, 6tU417) tWU o(Ac, £ut +74 & 4 e_ k 9.u 9. N+*' a442 6Uu clIMU £'* LJ1404 , ReceIved by:Inspected by: Pr- -/Hazardous Materl*'ComplIance DivIsIon Samples taken? Yes 9/ Photos taken? Yes No/ 2645PAGE2AEV683 ., Page 8 of 3 73 -//RK e-4 8 C'n*-Ce,. 7 1-*County of SaNa Clara 0FFIEiAL UfE 0NLY1 1nti ,6rA,w-/ 4,00, " · .BC: 22lf--4Enx[forimcnral Re50ukes Agency ./*SIGh* I Depar(mcnIofEnvlronmen(a! i lealth N tAllS&eJe205Al TdIHaZardous MaCerIals comPlIance DivISI(Jn 9O5252,*,g] f* 01 1 1/96-75- / 52%*9irl5an Jose. CatIfornia 951242690 11 5-3·/--P6-NiC JEZ2220 Moorpork, ·elluc,East Wing. Room204 9-'2 - Pf PS.1 7 (408) 2906930 FAX2806479 ®17.. -KG: 1 0 43- J,.-' .- .34*22(35,'0+47__ HAZARDOUS_ WASTE GENERATOR PERMIT PL A ON. ,§*at$-. _5ik -12606, Cr fre / RuUe, Cz Mailing'Address(if different) :,-5ar -PropMetoUBilling Name: .: -----S 6 04 -= Billing Address (jfdifferent from mailing address) ; - _ __ 1! &L Business Phone: 4Sf- 2ff-2/6 Hours of Operation : -1 AF <13 7: 6. PmContact Person : _/71/<f* 80Y,'3;t/Contact Phone: 9'of · _#<37- 12/1f _ _1ypeofBusLness: 17/Y i As,1, :kdEh*- EPAIDNumber: 0060 13 401Prinlary SIC (standa:d dulatC1=5tnon)C6de: _- _ Secondary SIC Code: List any other p6rmits you currently have for the storage, treatment and/or disp6sal0fhazardouswaste:_ _- 2 9s'- The annual permit fee is determined by the quantity of hazardous waste generatedper year, Check [X] the one line below that best describes the amountand kndofwaste generated by your business over the fast year. Hazardous WasteHazardous Waste Generated Business fodeI ] Recycles Waste 0il 0nly -'any amount, - 2212 A[ ] Generates less than100 kg/yr (Approx.·27 gallons).2212' B[Rf Generates less than 5 tons/year.2213 A[] Generates 5' to less than 25 tons/year.2213 B[ ] Generates 25' to less than 50tons/year.2213 C[ ] Generates 5.0 to less than250 tons/year.2213 D] Generates250 to less than 500 tons/year.2213'E[ ] Generates 500 to less than 1,000tons/year.2213 F[ ] Generates 1,000 to less.than 2,000 f6ns/year.2213 G[ ] Generates 2,000 or more tons/year.2213 H The'undersigned hereby appliesfor ahazardous waste generator-permit from the.County of Santa Clara and agrees to comply with all applicable hazardous wastefegulations and with inSpectional pr6cedures needed to insure compliance.m;*19HK4«_fno,*-Signature-of 0wner/Operator, TitIe , Date19iwird „1' 81134·n'I.;,*M: 1,[i·linrI Al. 1 1rnicIa.'7iir Lor.ri1,. I,11, GniizaIi·s, r&i,1 1,irId*,Ii. DinkI,r MrKenid; ..eD I0-d 0.LS08280IS '30IA83S 0lne -183.(009 tET:01 I33 46-81-033 1 County of Santa Clara Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Compliance Division (HMCD) 1555 Berger Drive, Suite300, San Jose, CA95112-2716 Phone (408) 918-3400 Fax (408) 280-6479 www.EHinfo.org/hazmat OFFICIAL NOTICE OF INSPECTION Facility ID: Site Address: Facility Name: FA0200739 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 10931 N DE ANZA BL, CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Inspection Date: 09/08/2017 HW Generator Type: RCRA LQG Pictures Taken Samples Taken ALBERT ESPINOZA, SERVICE MANAGERConsent to Inspect Granted By: >=1000 KG/MO. Summary of Violations & Notice to Comply Inspection Type: ROUTINE INSPECTION Program: PR0313936 - HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR - 2205 VC Class Corrective Actions TakenViolation HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION [3030005]G010 II Facility failed to determine whether a waste is a hazardous waste. Observed 1 x 55 gallon drum in the waste storage room. Per facility, they were unsure what the contents were. Make a hazardous waste determination and if determined to be hazardous manage accordingly. Determine whether the waste is hazardous using generator knowledge, or by having the waste analyzed by a state-certified environmental laboratory. Submit the results of your determination, including any laboratory reports, to HMCD. A list of state-certified laboratories is available at www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/labs/documents/elap_certifie d_hazardous_waste_labs.pdf . Cease any disposal of the waste as non-hazardous waste until the determination is complete. Keep all hazardous waste determination documents for at least 3 years from the date the waste was last shipped. [CCR 66262.11] MARKING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE [3030007]G020 M Facility failed to properly mark a hazardous waste tank and/or container. The following containers were missing complete hazardous waste markings: 3 x 15 gallon used oil rollers 1 x 120 gallon container of waste coolant Mark all hazardous waste tanks with the words "HAZARDOUS WASTE" and the accumulation start date. Mark all hazardous waste containers and portable tanks with the words "HAZARDOUS WASTE;" the accumulation start date; the name and address of the generator; and the composition, physical state, and hazardous properties of the waste. Additionally, mark used oil containers, aboveground tanks, and fill pipes for underground tanks with the words "USED OIL." [CCR 66262.34(f), 66279.21(b)] ACCUMULATION TIME: POINT OF GENERATION [3030057]G035 II Facility accumulated hazardous waste at the point of generation for longer than the allowed time limit. Observed 1 x 15 gallon container of waste brake fluid with an accumulation start date of 10/28/15. Make arrangements for the immediate removal of the waste. Submit to HMCD a copy of the manifest or consolidated manifest receipt demonstrating that the waste was removed. Ensure that point of generation wastes are not held on-site for longer than one year, or the applicable accumulation time limit (90/180/270 days) after the date the quantity limit was reached, whichever comes first. The quantity limit for each wastestream is 55 gallons for hazardous waste, or 1 quart for acutely/extremely hazardous waste. [CCR 66262.34(e)(1)(B)] R101DAUSHX7RM Ver. 2.02Page 1 of 5 OFFICIAL NOTICE OF INSPECTION Facility ID: Site Address: Facility Name: FA0200739 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 10931 N DE ANZA BL, CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Inspection Date: 09/08/2017 Summary of Violations & Notice to Comply VC Class Corrective Actions TakenViolation CONSOLIDATED MANIFESTING: RECEIPT RETENTION [3010]G052 M Facility failed to keep a consolidated manifest receipt for at least 3 years from the date of shipment. Per facility waste coolant is disposed of once a month. Disposal records for waste coolant were unavailable for review except for one dated 7/14/17. Obtain copies of all missing receipts noted above from your hazardous waste hauler. [HSC 25160.2(b)(3)] MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF FACILITY [3030030]G110 M Facility is not maintained or operated in a manner to minimize the possibility of a fire, explosion, or any unplanned release of hazardous waste to air, soil, or surface water that could threaten human health or the environment. Observed saturated absorbent on the floor surrounding the secondary containment and free flowing amounts of used oil in the secondary containment areas. Per facility, the absorbent has been accumulating there "for years" Ensure that secondary containment and surrounding areas are clean and free of saturated absorbent and free flowing liquids to minimize the event of an unplanned release into the environment. Maintain and operate the facility in a manner that minimizes potential emergencies and unplanned releases. [CCR 66265.31, CFR 265.31] TANK SYSTEM ASSESSMENT:INSTALLATION [3010025]G340 II Facility failed to obtain or keep on file a current and complete written hazardous waste tank system assessment prepared at the time of installation of the tank. Per facility, a tank assessment has not been performed for the 1 x 220 gallon used oil tank. Make arrangements to have the tank system assessed by an appropriate Professional Engineer (PE) who is knowledgeable of hazardous waste tank system requirements. Provide a specific date by which the assessment is expected to be completed. Upon completion of the assessment, submit a copy of the final report to HMCD. [CCR 66265.191(a), 66265.192(a), 66265.192(h)] TANK INSPECTIONS [3030029]G343 M Facility could not demonstrate that hazardous waste tanks are being inspected daily as required. Observed incomplete entries in the daily tank log inspection book attached to 1 x 220 gallon used oil tank. Per facility daily inspections are not being conducted. Perform and document hazardous waste tank inspections daily. Inspections must cover: 1) overfill/spill control equipment; 2) aboveground portions of the tank system; 3) data gathered from monitoring and leak detection equipment; 4) construction materials and the area immediately surrounding the tank system; and 5) the level of waste in the tank, for uncovered tanks. [CCR 66265.195] R101DAUSHX7RM Ver. 2.02Page 2 of 5 OFFICIAL NOTICE OF INSPECTION Facility ID: Site Address: Facility Name: FA0200739 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 10931 N DE ANZA BL, CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Inspection Date: 09/08/2017 Summary of Violations & Notice to Comply VC Class Corrective Actions TakenViolation MANAGEMENT OF CONTAMINATED CONTAINERS [3030058]G403 II Facility improperly treated, managed, or disposed of a hazardous materials container that was not empty because it still contained a pourable or scrapeable quantity of hazardous material that upon disposal meets the definition of a hazardous waste. Observed 1 x quart bottle of injection fluid in the trash with pourable amounts of product present. Ensure that all containers under 5 gallons are completely empty of free flowing liquids and scrap able material before disposal. Thoroughly empty hazardous material/waste containers prior to treating, managing, or disposing of them, when allowed under empty container management standards. If a container cannot be emptied, manage it per standard hazardous waste requirements. [CCR 66261.7(b)] Comments: On site to conduct a routine hazardous waste inspection Areas inspected include service bays, back storage room, hazardous waste accumulation areas and dumpsters Observed the following wastes on site: 1 x 220 gallon tank of used oil 1 x 120 gallon container of waste coolant 3 x 55 gallon drums of drained used oil filters 1 x 55 gallon drum of oily debris (paper filters) 1 x 55 gallon drum of waste absorbent 3 x 15 gallon used oil rollers 1 x 15 gallon drum of waste brake fluid (point of generation) Fire extinguishers have had annual maintenance Spill control is available on site Rags are manages my UniFirst Batteries are managed by NAPA Brake shavings are collected and managed as scrap metal Container areas are inspected weekly Employee training plan and records are available in Goodyear's Online Portal Facility's Emergency plan is available online via CERS Disposal records were reviewed EPA ID# CAL000013487 is active The following violations were corrected on site: 1 x 55 gallon drum of waste oily debris was missing the start date. Start date was added during inspection Immediately correct any violation designated as a Class I or Class II violation. Correct all other violations no later than 10/08/2017, unless otherwise noted by the inspector. Using the space provided, write a brief description of the actions taken by the facility to correct each violation. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. Within 5 days of achieving compliance or within 35 days of the inspection date, whichever comes first, sign the certification statement below and return a copy of this report to HMCD. Time granted for correction of violations does not preclude any enforcement action by HMCD or other agencies. This facility may be subject to reinspection at any time. [Authority: HSC 25185(c), 25187.8, 25404.1.2(c)] Service Manager Albert EspinozaReceived By:Inspected By:EE0010435 - LOREN LIM R101DAUSHX7RM Ver. 2.02Page 3 of 5 OFFICIAL NOTICE OF INSPECTION Facility ID: Site Address: Facility Name: FA0200739 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 10931 N DE ANZA BL, CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Inspection Date: 09/08/2017 Summary of Violations & Notice to Comply I certify under penalty of perjury that this facility has complied with directives specified in this Notice to Comply. Certification of Compliance Signature of Owner/Operator Printed Name of Owner/Operator Date Title R101DAUSHX7RM Ver. 2.02Page 4 of 5 OFFICIAL NOTICE OF INSPECTION- SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION This Official Notice of Inspection (NOI) documents the results of an inspection by HMCD, including a list of alleged violations, evidence in support of the alleged violations, corrective actions that must be taken by the facility, and general observations. What am I supposed to do upon receiving a NOI? • Correct the violations within 30 days of the inspection date, unless otherwise noted. • In the “Corrective Actions Taken” column, write a brief description of the actions taken by the facility to correct each violation. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. • Certify that the facility has returned to compliance by signing and dating the certification statement at the end of the report. • Make a photocopy of the NOI and any attachments for your records. • Within 5 days of achieving compliance or 35days of the inspection date, whichever comes first, return the original copy of the report and any attachments to HMCD at 1555Berger Drive, Suite 300, San Jose, CA95112-2716. What if there are violations that cannot be corrected within30 days? For each violation that cannot be corrected within 30 days, submit a written Compliance Plan describing the corrective actions you propose to take and the date by which the actions will be completed. State law grants up to 30 days to correct minor violations without penalty. Minor violations that are uncorrected after 30 days, and class I and II violations may be subject to enforcement action. To lessen the possibility of enforcement action, correct all violations as soon as possible. What if I disagree with a violation on the NOI? If you disagree with any violation listed in this NOI, you must submit a written Notice of Disagreement to HMCD within 30 days of the inspection date. Address such notices to the attention of the inspector who cited the violation. In your Notice of Disagreement, explain in detail why you believe the alleged violation was incorrectly cited. What about photographs or samples taken during the inspection? A co-located sample will be given to you upon request if adequate sample volume is available. Photographs and sample analytical results will not generally be available until after the inspection has been concluded. A copy of photographs and/or analytical results will be provided to you upon written request. Photographs and sample analytical results may be withheld in the event of a criminal investigation or other ongoing investigation. Key to Acronyms and Regulatory Terms XX CCR California Code of Regulations, Title XX XX CFR Code of Federal Regulations, Title XX Class Violation classification: I = Class I violation, II = Class II violation, M = Minor violation, C = Corrected minor violation [HSC §25110.8.5, HSC §25117.6, CCR §66260.10] DTSC California Department of Toxic Substances Control EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency HMCD County of Santa Clara, Department of Environmental Health, Hazardous Materials Compliance Division HSC California Health and Safety Code RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act SCCO Santa Clara County Ordinance Code TSDF Hazardous waste treatment, storage or disposal facility UPCF Unified Program Consolidated Form UST Underground storage tank VC HMCD violation code Warning: • It is a violation of State law to make a false statement that a facility has returned to compliance [HSC §25404.1.2(c)(2)]. • Making a false statement regarding a hazardous waste violation is punishable by a fine of not less than $2,000 or more than $25,000 and/or imprisonment in the county jail for up to one year [HSC §25191(b)]. • Making a false statement regarding an underground storage tank violation is punishable by a fine of not less than $500 or more than $5,000 [HSC § §25299(a)(8), 25299(b)(7)]. • HMCD has the right to require the submittal of reasonable and necessary documentation in support of any claim of compliance made by your facility [HSC §25187.8(i)]. HMCD-014A www.EHinfo.org/hazmat Rev. 07/28/10 R101DAUSHX7RM Ver. 2.02Page 5 of 5 County of Santa Clara Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Compliance Division (HMCD) 1555 Berger Drive, Suite300, San Jose, CA95112-2716 Phone (408) 918-3400 Fax (408) 280-6479 www.EHinfo.org/hazmat OFFICIAL NOTICE OF INSPECTION Facility ID: Site Address: Facility Name: FA0200739 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 10931 N DE ANZA BL, CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Inspection Date: 09/08/2017 HW Generator Type: RCRA LQG Pictures Taken Samples Taken ALBERT ESPINOZA, SERVICE MANAGERConsent to Inspect Granted By: >=1000 KG/MO. Summary of Violations & Notice to Comply Inspection Type: ROUTINE INSPECTION Program: PR0313936 - HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR - 2205 VC Class Corrective Actions TakenViolation HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATION [3030005]G010 II Facility failed to determine whether a waste is a hazardous waste. Observed 1 x 55 gallon drum in the waste storage room. Per facility, they were unsure what the contents were. Make a hazardous waste determination and if determined to be hazardous manage accordingly. Determine whether the waste is hazardous using generator knowledge, or by having the waste analyzed by a state-certified environmental laboratory. Submit the results of your determination, including any laboratory reports, to HMCD. A list of state-certified laboratories is available at www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/labs/documents/elap_certifie d_hazardous_waste_labs.pdf . Cease any disposal of the waste as non-hazardous waste until the determination is complete. Keep all hazardous waste determination documents for at least 3 years from the date the waste was last shipped. [CCR 66262.11] MARKING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE [3030007]G020 M Facility failed to properly mark a hazardous waste tank and/or container. The following containers were missing complete hazardous waste markings: 3 x 15 gallon used oil rollers 1 x 120 gallon container of waste coolant Mark all hazardous waste tanks with the words "HAZARDOUS WASTE" and the accumulation start date. Mark all hazardous waste containers and portable tanks with the words "HAZARDOUS WASTE;" the accumulation start date; the name and address of the generator; and the composition, physical state, and hazardous properties of the waste. Additionally, mark used oil containers, aboveground tanks, and fill pipes for underground tanks with the words "USED OIL." [CCR 66262.34(f), 66279.21(b)] ACCUMULATION TIME: POINT OF GENERATION [3030057]G035 II Facility accumulated hazardous waste at the point of generation for longer than the allowed time limit. Observed 1 x 15 gallon container of waste brake fluid with an accumulation start date of 10/28/15. Make arrangements for the immediate removal of the waste. Submit to HMCD a copy of the manifest or consolidated manifest receipt demonstrating that the waste was removed. Ensure that point of generation wastes are not held on-site for longer than one year, or the applicable accumulation time limit (90/180/270 days) after the date the quantity limit was reached, whichever comes first. The quantity limit for each wastestream is 55 gallons for hazardous waste, or 1 quart for acutely/extremely hazardous waste. [CCR 66262.34(e)(1)(B)] R101DAUSHX7RM Ver. 2.02Page 1 of 5 Please see attached letter for all corrective actions OFFICIAL NOTICE OF INSPECTION Facility ID: Site Address: Facility Name: FA0200739 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 10931 N DE ANZA BL, CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Inspection Date: 09/08/2017 Summary of Violations & Notice to Comply VC Class Corrective Actions TakenViolation CONSOLIDATED MANIFESTING: RECEIPT RETENTION [3010]G052 M Facility failed to keep a consolidated manifest receipt for at least 3 years from the date of shipment. Per facility waste coolant is disposed of once a month. Disposal records for waste coolant were unavailable for review except for one dated 7/14/17. Obtain copies of all missing receipts noted above from your hazardous waste hauler. [HSC 25160.2(b)(3)] MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF FACILITY [3030030]G110 M Facility is not maintained or operated in a manner to minimize the possibility of a fire, explosion, or any unplanned release of hazardous waste to air, soil, or surface water that could threaten human health or the environment. Observed saturated absorbent on the floor surrounding the secondary containment and free flowing amounts of used oil in the secondary containment areas. Per facility, the absorbent has been accumulating there "for years" Ensure that secondary containment and surrounding areas are clean and free of saturated absorbent and free flowing liquids to minimize the event of an unplanned release into the environment. Maintain and operate the facility in a manner that minimizes potential emergencies and unplanned releases. [CCR 66265.31, CFR 265.31] TANK SYSTEM ASSESSMENT:INSTALLATION [3010025]G340 II Facility failed to obtain or keep on file a current and complete written hazardous waste tank system assessment prepared at the time of installation of the tank. Per facility, a tank assessment has not been performed for the 1 x 220 gallon used oil tank. Make arrangements to have the tank system assessed by an appropriate Professional Engineer (PE) who is knowledgeable of hazardous waste tank system requirements. Provide a specific date by which the assessment is expected to be completed. Upon completion of the assessment, submit a copy of the final report to HMCD. [CCR 66265.191(a), 66265.192(a), 66265.192(h)] TANK INSPECTIONS [3030029]G343 M Facility could not demonstrate that hazardous waste tanks are being inspected daily as required. Observed incomplete entries in the daily tank log inspection book attached to 1 x 220 gallon used oil tank. Per facility daily inspections are not being conducted. Perform and document hazardous waste tank inspections daily. Inspections must cover: 1) overfill/spill control equipment; 2) aboveground portions of the tank system; 3) data gathered from monitoring and leak detection equipment; 4) construction materials and the area immediately surrounding the tank system; and 5) the level of waste in the tank, for uncovered tanks. [CCR 66265.195] R101DAUSHX7RM Ver. 2.02Page 2 of 5 OFFICIAL NOTICE OF INSPECTION Facility ID: Site Address: Facility Name: FA0200739 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 10931 N DE ANZA BL, CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Inspection Date: 09/08/2017 Summary of Violations & Notice to Comply VC Class Corrective Actions TakenViolation MANAGEMENT OF CONTAMINATED CONTAINERS [3030058]G403 II Facility improperly treated, managed, or disposed of a hazardous materials container that was not empty because it still contained a pourable or scrapeable quantity of hazardous material that upon disposal meets the definition of a hazardous waste. Observed 1 x quart bottle of injection fluid in the trash with pourable amounts of product present. Ensure that all containers under 5 gallons are completely empty of free flowing liquids and scrap able material before disposal. Thoroughly empty hazardous material/waste containers prior to treating, managing, or disposing of them, when allowed under empty container management standards. If a container cannot be emptied, manage it per standard hazardous waste requirements. [CCR 66261.7(b)] Comments: On site to conduct a routine hazardous waste inspection Areas inspected include service bays, back storage room, hazardous waste accumulation areas and dumpsters Observed the following wastes on site: 1 x 220 gallon tank of used oil 1 x 120 gallon container of waste coolant 3 x 55 gallon drums of drained used oil filters 1 x 55 gallon drum of oily debris (paper filters) 1 x 55 gallon drum of waste absorbent 3 x 15 gallon used oil rollers 1 x 15 gallon drum of waste brake fluid (point of generation) Fire extinguishers have had annual maintenance Spill control is available on site Rags are manages my UniFirst Batteries are managed by NAPA Brake shavings are collected and managed as scrap metal Container areas are inspected weekly Employee training plan and records are available in Goodyear's Online Portal Facility's Emergency plan is available online via CERS Disposal records were reviewed EPA ID# CAL000013487 is active The following violations were corrected on site: 1 x 55 gallon drum of waste oily debris was missing the start date. Start date was added during inspection Immediately correct any violation designated as a Class I or Class II violation. Correct all other violations no later than 10/08/2017, unless otherwise noted by the inspector. Using the space provided, write a brief description of the actions taken by the facility to correct each violation. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. Within 5 days of achieving compliance or within 35 days of the inspection date, whichever comes first, sign the certification statement below and return a copy of this report to HMCD. Time granted for correction of violations does not preclude any enforcement action by HMCD or other agencies. This facility may be subject to reinspection at any time. [Authority: HSC 25185(c), 25187.8, 25404.1.2(c)] Service Manager Albert EspinozaReceived By:Inspected By:EE0010435 - LOREN LIM R101DAUSHX7RM Ver. 2.02Page 3 of 5 OFFICIAL NOTICE OF INSPECTION Facility ID: Site Address: Facility Name: FA0200739 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO 10931 N DE ANZA BL, CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Inspection Date: 09/08/2017 Summary of Violations & Notice to Comply I certify under penalty of perjury that this facility has complied with directives specified in this Notice to Comply. Certification of Compliance Signature of Owner/Operator Printed Name of Owner/Operator Date Title R101DAUSHX7RM Ver. 2.02Page 4 of 5 OFFICIAL NOTICE OF INSPECTION- SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION This Official Notice of Inspection (NOI) documents the results of an inspection by HMCD, including a list of alleged violations, evidence in support of the alleged violations, corrective actions that must be taken by the facility, and general observations. What am I supposed to do upon receiving a NOI? • Correct the violations within 30 days of the inspection date, unless otherwise noted. • In the “Corrective Actions Taken” column, write a brief description of the actions taken by the facility to correct each violation. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. • Certify that the facility has returned to compliance by signing and dating the certification statement at the end of the report. • Make a photocopy of the NOI and any attachments for your records. • Within 5 days of achieving compliance or 35days of the inspection date, whichever comes first, return the original copy of the report and any attachments to HMCD at 1555Berger Drive, Suite 300, San Jose, CA95112-2716. What if there are violations that cannot be corrected within30 days? For each violation that cannot be corrected within 30 days, submit a written Compliance Plan describing the corrective actions you propose to take and the date by which the actions will be completed. State law grants up to 30 days to correct minor violations without penalty. Minor violations that are uncorrected after 30 days, and class I and II violations may be subject to enforcement action. To lessen the possibility of enforcement action, correct all violations as soon as possible. What if I disagree with a violation on the NOI? If you disagree with any violation listed in this NOI, you must submit a written Notice of Disagreement to HMCD within 30 days of the inspection date. Address such notices to the attention of the inspector who cited the violation. In your Notice of Disagreement, explain in detail why you believe the alleged violation was incorrectly cited. What about photographs or samples taken during the inspection? A co-located sample will be given to you upon request if adequate sample volume is available. Photographs and sample analytical results will not generally be available until after the inspection has been concluded. A copy of photographs and/or analytical results will be provided to you upon written request. Photographs and sample analytical results may be withheld in the event of a criminal investigation or other ongoing investigation. Key to Acronyms and Regulatory Terms XX CCR California Code of Regulations, Title XX XX CFR Code of Federal Regulations, Title XX Class Violation classification: I = Class I violation, II = Class II violation, M = Minor violation, C = Corrected minor violation [HSC §25110.8.5, HSC §25117.6, CCR §66260.10] DTSC California Department of Toxic Substances Control EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency HMCD County of Santa Clara, Department of Environmental Health, Hazardous Materials Compliance Division HSC California Health and Safety Code RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act SCCO Santa Clara County Ordinance Code TSDF Hazardous waste treatment, storage or disposal facility UPCF Unified Program Consolidated Form UST Underground storage tank VC HMCD violation code Warning: • It is a violation of State law to make a false statement that a facility has returned to compliance [HSC §25404.1.2(c)(2)]. • Making a false statement regarding a hazardous waste violation is punishable by a fine of not less than $2,000 or more than $25,000 and/or imprisonment in the county jail for up to one year [HSC §25191(b)]. • Making a false statement regarding an underground storage tank violation is punishable by a fine of not less than $500 or more than $5,000 [HSC § §25299(a)(8), 25299(b)(7)]. • HMCD has the right to require the submittal of reasonable and necessary documentation in support of any claim of compliance made by your facility [HSC §25187.8(i)]. HMCD-014A www.EHinfo.org/hazmat Rev. 07/28/10 R101DAUSHX7RM Ver. 2.02Page 5 of 5 200 Innovation Way Akron, Ohio 44316 – 0001 November 2, 2017 Ms. Loren Lim County of Santa Clara Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Compliance Division 1555 Berger Drive Suite 300 San Jose Ca 95112-2716 Dear Ms. Lim, This letter is in response to Official Notice of inspection for FA0200739. G010 Drum was properly classified and shipped through Safety Kleen on 9/26/17. Manifest A Aerosols Can is attached. G020 We were not sure what was meant by 3x15 used oil rollers. Here is a photo of the waste coolant label. G035 We had this shipped off site to Safety Kleen on 9/26/17. Manifest B Brake Fluid Absorbents is attached. 200 Innovation Way Akron, Ohio 44316 – 0001 G052 Safety Kleen is contracted to pick up waste coolant. We have placed this waste stream on a 90 day pick up schedule. G110 Floor around secondary containment has been cleaned. Saturated pads and clean up items shipped to Safety Kleen on 9/26. Manifest B Brake Fluid Absorbents is attached. G340 We have contracted through our service provider to get this tank assessment completed. We expect to have this completed by the end of November. I will forward a copy to you when it is completed. G343 Store has started the Daily Tank Inspection in October. We will inspect daily and record on log. G403 Store has started using a bottle draining system. See photo. 200 Innovation Way Akron, Ohio 44316 – 0001 At Goodyear, we are continuously striving to maintain a safe and healthy work environment. If you have any questions, please contact me at 330-208-7783 or at anthony_desanto@goodyear.com. Sincerely, Tony DeSanto Retail EHS Manager Goodyear Tire And Rubber Company APPENDIX F QUALIFICATIONS Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 Christopher Olsen – Associate Consultant Education: BA Environmental Studies, UC Santa Barbara MBA Santa Clara University, Leavey School of Business Training/Licenses/Registrations: AHERA, Asbestos Building Inspector Summary of professional experience: Mr. Olsen has had experience in the environmental consulting, property disclosure, and real estate due diligence industry since 1994. Mr. Olsen has performed several thousand Phase I ESAs, including Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD and FDIC scopes of work. Mr. Olsen has performed asbestos, lead-based paint, radon, and mold sampling on hundreds of Phase I ESA projects. He has completed Phase I ESA projects on all property types, including heavy and light industrial, commercial office and retail, hospitality, multi-family, mobile home parks, hospital and skilled nursing facilities, resort properties, automotive service facilities, and waste processing facilities. Mr. Olsen has several years’ experience reviewing Phase I ESA reports, and conducing “desk reviews” of Phase I ESAs as a third party reviewer. Mr. Olsen has completed approximately 50 PCA reports. Select Phase I ESA project experience for Mr. Olsen includes:  Oakridge Shopping Center, San Jose, CA - This 1.14M SF shopping center was constructed in 1971. HRECs were identified in connection with a former auto service facility which was on site. Mr. Olsen recommended an ACM O&M plan.  Garaventa Transfer Station, Pittsburg, CA - This 11.05 acre site is a recycling and solid waste transfer station. RECs were identified and an ACM O&M plan was recommended as well as continued groundwater monitoring and remediation per RWQCB requirements.  Embassy Suites, South Lake Tahoe, CA - Embassy Suites is a resort hotel. No RECs were identified; however, Mr. Olsen recommended an ACM O&M plan.  Durkee Industrial Facility, Richmond, CA - This 6.32 acre commercial/industrial property was found to have multiple RECs due to historic industrial uses. Groundwater contamination was reported. Mr. Olsen recommended continued groundwater monitoring and remediation per RWQCB requirements.  Office Tower, 100 Van Ness Ave, San Francisco, CA - This 29 story office tower constructed in 1973 was undergoing a complete interior renovation for conversion to residential use. Several RECs were identified due to the operation of vaulted tanks without permits or tank testing documentation.  Mixed-use Property, Oakland, CA - This 2.45 acre site consisted of ten office and retail buildings constructed between 1868 and 1881. RECs were identified in connection with undocumented former onsite contaminated soil removal. Additionally, an adjacent open SLIC case (groundwater contamination) was reported.  Portfolio of five multi-family residential facilities, San Francisco, CA - No RECs were found while reviewing this portfolio of multi-family residential properties in San Francisco. Mr. Olsen recommended both ACM and LBP O&M plans for these properties. Nicole Burns – Client Manager B.S. – Occupational Safety and Health, Keene State College, Keene, New Hampshire - 2007 Ms. Burns has been in the environmental industry since 2007 and provides project management and oversight to ensure compliance and satisfaction of client requirements for Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, Real Estate Transaction Screens, Database Reviews, and other similar environmental assessments. She has successfully completed assessments on a variety of residential, agricultural, commercial and complex industrial sites. Ms. Burns is accustomed to all aspects of Due Diligence Property Assessments and the needs and requirements of a variety of reporting standards, including ASTM, EPA’s All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI), Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, and customized client formats. Project experience for Ms. Burns includes: • Conducted numerous Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, Environmental Transaction Screens, Regulatory Database Reviews for residential, commercial and industrial properties throughout the Northeast, Nevada and California, which included field inspections, conducting state and federal research, and interpretation of State specific environmental programs; • Conducted groundwater monitoring activities at a closed solid waste landfill in Connecticut, which included logging and analyzing data and generating quarterly reports; • Phase II Environmental Site Assessments and Limited Subsurface Investigations including groundwater and soil sampling activities, collection of field samples, and analyzing environmental data; • Assisted in the operations of field logging, geotechnical surveys, environmental drilling, and sample collection at the Southern California Edison Tehachapi Transmission Project. In addition, Ms. Burns performed daily air monitoring for dust control of pesticide and herbicide contaminated soils including summarizing and evaluation of data; • Completed AHERA accredited Building Inspector for Asbestos courses. Ms. Burns has also performed several asbestos inspections, mold inspections, and lead- based paint inspections throughout Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York State As a Client Manager, Ms. Burns provides senior author services and client management, including project management and staff mentorship. APPENDIX G LIST OF COMMONLY USED ABBREVIATIONS Project No. 392233 August 8, 2018 UNITS µg/L Micrograms per Liter pCi/L PicoCuries per Liter mg/kg Milligrams per Kilogram ppb Parts per Billion mg/L Milligrams per Liter ppm Parts per Million ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS  ACM Asbestos-Containing Material NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants ADJ Adjacent site NFA No Further Action AEI AEI Consultants NFRAP No Further Remedial Action Planned AHERA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act NLR No Longer Reporting APN Assessor’s Parcel Number NOV Notice of Violation AST Aboveground Storage Tank NPL National Priorities List AUL Activity and Use Limitation O&M Operations and Maintenance bgs Below Ground Surface OEC Other Environmental Considerations BTEX Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyl CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System PCE, PERC Perchloroethylene, Tetrachloroethylene, Tetrachloroethene CESQGs Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act COC Contaminant of Concern REC Recognized Environmental Condition CREC Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition RP Responsible Party EC Engineering Controls SDS Safety Data Sheet EDR Environmental Data Resources, Inc. SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System EPA Environmental Protection Agency SF Square Footage/Square Feet ERIS Environmental Risk Information Services SP Subject Property ERNS Emergency Response Notification System SQG Small Quantity Generator ESA Environmental Site Assessment SWLF Solid Waste Landfill GPR Ground-Penetrating Radar SVOC Semi-Volatile Organic Compound HREC Historical Recognized Environmental Condition TCE Trichloroethylene, Trichloroethene HVAC Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons HWS Hazardous Waste Site TPHd Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (diesel range) IC Institutional Controls TPHg Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (gasoline range) LBP Lead-Based Paint TPHo Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (oil range) LCP Lead-Containing Paint TRPH Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons LLP Landowner Liability Protection TSDF Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facility LQG Large Quantity Generator USDA United States Department of Agriculture LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank USGS United States Geological Survey MCL Maximum Contaminant Level UST Underground Storage Tank MTBE Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program ND None Detected VOC Volatile Organic Compound 1485 BAYSHORE BOULEVARD, #109, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94124 TEL: 415-467-9000 FAX: 415-467-9100 October 26, 2018 Jeremy Haggberg De Anza Properties 960 North San Antonio Road, Suite 114 Los Altos, CA 94022 RE:Limited Phase II ESA Soil & Soil Vapor Sampling Results 10931 North De Anza Blvd, Cupertino, CA 95014 Dear Mr. Haggberg: As per the request of De Anza Properties (Client), Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. (ARTI) has prepared this letter report regarding a limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) related to commercial property located at 10931 North De Anza Boulevard, in Cupertino, California (Site) as shown in Figure 1. FIELD ACTIVITIES Drilling of Seven (7) Borings for Soil & Soil Vapor Sampling:ARTI drilled a total of seven (7) soil borings adjacent to and in proximity to the existing Hydraulic Lifts and existing in-ground Clarifier (or identified as an Oil/Water Separator) areas. Six (6) soil borings (B1 through B6) were drilled to a depth of approximately ten (10) feet, and adjacent to six (6) existing Hydraulic Lifts. One (1) soil boring (Boring B7) was drilled to a depth of approximately twelve (12) feet, and adjacent to the O/W (Oil/Water) Separator location (for boring locations see Figure 2, and for boring logs see Appendix A). Additionally, the one (1) soil boring (Boring B7) located at the O/W Separator area was converted into a temporary soil vapor well for collection of soil vapor samples at two different depths using two vapor probes placed at depths of approximately 8.0 feet and 11.5 feet below ground surface(bgs), respectively. Each boring was advanced using a truck-mounted Geoprobe direct push drill rig equipped with a macrocore sampling system. Soil cores will be collected with the macro sampling system in acetate liners under the direction of a licensed California professional (geologist/civil engineer). All soil samples were collected at bottom of each of the borings. Geophysical Survey for Location of 200-Gallon Waste Oil UST:ARTI performed a geophysical survey within accessible areas (perimeter areas around the building structure) of the Site to evaluate the presence of the 200-gallon waste oil Underground Storage Tanks (UST). The ground penetrating radar (GPR) method used did not identify any anomalies or signatures from the scans that would suggest the presence of the UST (see Appendix B for the GPR survey results). Limited Phase II ESA 10931 North De Anza Blvd, Cupertino, CA Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc.Page 2 LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS Soil Sampling Results: The soil samples collected fromthe seven (7) soil borings were analyzed for various contaminants of concern (COCs) by a state-certified lab as following (see Table 1 below for a summary of the lab results shown in Appendix C): Hydraulic Lift Area – A total of six (6) soil samples (Borings B1 through B6) collected at each of the Hydraulic Lift locations were analyzed by a state-certified lab for TPH (Total Volatile Hydrocarbons) as Diesel (TPH-d) & TPH as Motor Oil (TPH-mo) per EPA Method 8015B, and PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyls) per EPA Method 8082. Oil/Water Separator Area – The one (1) soil sample collected from Boring B7 in this area was analyzed by a state-certified lab for TPH Multi-Range including Diesel, Gasoline and Motor Oil per EPA Method 8015Bm, PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyls) per EPA Method 8082, and VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds) using EPA Method 8260B. The soil sampling lab results are summarized below in Table 1, and indicate detection of very low levels of TPH-d and TPH-mo in the hydraulic lift areas, which however are belowthe San Francisco Regional Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Soil Tier 1 Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs). All other lab results for the soils including PCBs were reported below detection limits and are indicated as ND (Non-Detect). TABLE 1 – SUMMARY OF SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTS SAMPLE ID DATE DEPTH (ft bgs) TPH-Diesel (mg/kg) TPH- Motor Oil (mg/kg) TPH-Multi Range (mg/kg) VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds) (mg/kg) PCBs (mg/kg) B1-10 10/10/18 10 1.6 ND NA NA ND B2-10 10/10/18 10 4.2 ND NA NA ND B3-10 10/10/18 10 3.4 5.8 NA NA ND B4-10 10/10/18 10 2.3 8.8 NA NA ND B5-10 10/10/18 10 1.6 7.7 NA NA ND B6-10 10/10/18 10 1.3 7.0 NA NA ND B7-12 10/10/18 12 NA NA ND ND ND TIER 1 ESLs - - 230 5,100 Varies by Compound Varies by Compound Varies by Compound NOTES: 1) Tier 1 ESLs (Environmental Screening Levels) based on SFRWQCB Interim Final, Rev. 3, Feb 2016 2) ND = Non Detect 3) NA = Not Analyzed Limited Phase II ESA 10931 North De Anza Blvd, Cupertino, CA Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc.Page 3 Soil Vapor Sampling Results: The temporary soil vapor well (converted at Boring B7) located near the in-ground O/W Separator area was used to collect soil vapor samples from each of the two vapor probes placed in the well at depths of approximately 8 feet and 11.5 feet bgs. The two (2) soil vapor samples collected at the two different depths were analyzed by a state-certified lab for VOCs using EPA Method TO-15 (see Table 2 below for a summary of the lab results shown in Appendix C). As shown below in Table 2, the results for the soil vapor samples indicate low levels of the generally concerned VOCs, which however, are belowthe SanFrancisco Regional QualityControl Board(SFRWQCB) Soil Gas Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs). In addition, several compounds other compounds, including 1,1,1-Trichloroethane, 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene, 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene, 4-Ethyltoluene, Carbon Disulfide, Chloroform, Dichlorodifluoromethane and Ethylbenzene, were reported at or near non-detection limits. TABLE 2 – SUMMARY OF SOIL VAPOR ANALYTICAL RESULTS FOR VOCS SAMPLE ID DATE DEPTH (ft bgs) TCE (g/m3) PCE (g/m3) Acetone (g/m3) MIBK (g/m3) Benzene (g/m3) Toluene (g/m3) Xylenes (g/m3) B7-8.0 10/10/18 8.0 5.5 4.2 32.7 4.2 13.2 13.1 8.3 B7-11.5 10/10/18 11.5 2.1 3.0 8.8 ND 8.5 9.3 4.9 ESL-R - - 240 240 1.5E+07 2.1E+05 48 1.6E+05 5.2E+04 ESL-C - - 3,000 2,100 3.1E+07 4.2E+05 420 1.3E+06 4.4E+05 NOTES: 1) ESL-R = Environmental Screening Levels, Residential, based on SFRWQCB Interim Final, Rev. 3, Feb 2016 2) ESL-R = Environmental Screening Levels, Commercial, based on SFRWQCB Interim Final, Rev. 3, Feb 2016 3) ND = Not Detect DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION As indicated above in Table 1, very low detectable concentrations of TPH-d (as Diesel) and TPH-mo (as Motor Oil) were reported in all six (6) soil samples (Borings B1 through B6) collected from the hydraulic lift areas. However, these soil concentrations are below the San Francisco Regional Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Tier 1 Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs). No detectable concentrations of PCBs were reported in all the six (6) soil samples collected from the hydraulic lift areas. Also, as indicated above in Table 1, the one (1) soil sample collected from Boring B7 near the in-ground Oil/Water Separator area reported detection levels as ND (Non-Detect) for TPH Multi-Range including Diesel, Gasoline & Motor Oil, VOCs and PCBs. In addition, two (2) soil vapor samples were collected from each of the two soil vapor probes located at two different depths of 8.0 feet and 11.5 feet bgs in the temporary soil vapor well that was converted at Boring B7 located at the in-ground Oil/Water Separator area. As indicated above in Table 2, the soil vapor concentrations of VOCs from these samples were reported at relatively low levels, which are below the San Francisco Regional Quality Control Board (SFRWQCB) Soil Gas Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs). Finally, a geophysical survey was performed within accessible areas (perimeter areas around the building structure) of the Site to evaluate the presence of the 200-gallon waste oil Underground Storage Tanks (UST). The ground penetrating radar (GPR) method used did not identify any anomalies or signatures from the scans that would suggest the presence of the UST (see Appendix B for the GPR survey results). Limited Phase II ESA 10931 North De Anza Blvd, Cupertino, CA Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc.Page 4 This report was prepared consistent with generally accepted environmental consulting principles and practices that arewithinthelimitationsdescribedin AppendixD. We thank youfor providingus the opportunityfor performing the limited Phase II ESA. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call us at (415) 816-2134 or contact us via email at asghuman@applied.us.com. Very Truly Yours, APPLIED REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Varinder S. Oberoi, PE Apri S. Ghuman, PE, CIH Senior Engineer Principal Engineer Attachments: Figure 1 – Site Location Map Figure 2 – Site Plan Appendix A – Soil Boring Logs Appendix B – Ground Penetrating Radar Survey Appendix C – Laboratory Analytical Results Appendix D - Limitations FIGURE10/24/2018 3:49:23 PM F:\Dropbox\3ds max network\ARTI\10931 N De Anza Blvd\10931 N De Anza Blvd_v01.rvt1SITE LOCATION MAP10931 N De Anza Blvd, Cupertino, CA 95014DRAWN BY:CEPROJ.#983-01APPROVED BY:AGPROJECT LOCATION0200100SCALE IN FEET(APPROXIMATE)BASE MAP FROM 2018 GOOGLE EARTH B6B5B3B2B1B7B4LEGENDB-1APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF SOIL BORINGS BY APPLIED REMEDIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (DRILLED 10/10/18)FIGURE10/24/2018 3:49:38 PM F:\Dropbox\3ds max network\ARTI\10931 N De Anza Blvd\10931 N De Anza Blvd_v01.rvt2SITE PLAN10931 N De Anza Blvd, Cupertino, CA 95014DRAWN BY:CEPROJ.#983-01APPROVED BY:AGBASE MAP FROM GOOGLE MAPS 2018 (NOT TO SCALE)NOTE: BORING & WELL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATESITE PHOTOS SHOWING APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF BORINGS APPENDIX “A” 10931 De Anza Blvd. Cupertino, California BORING LOG BORING B1 DeAnza 10-10-18 ARTI ECA ( C - 5 7 # 6 9 5 9 7 0 ) 10931 DeAnza Blvd., Cupertino, CA11 SILTY SAND (SW): Reddish Brown (5YR4/3), estimated slightly damp, estimated loose to medium dense. Sand is fine. With trace gravels. SANDY GRAVEL (GW): Brown (7.5YR5/4), estimated slightly damp, estimated dense to very dense. Approximately 50% angular gravel up to 1 inch. Approximately 50% coarse sand. Increased gravel content (approximately 75%). 4-6” Concrete slab. NA NA Forrest Cook PG#8201 SW GW BOH = 10’ Backfilled with neat cement (Portland I/II) Geoprobe with Macrocore sampler B1-10 1 2 3 5 4 6 7 8 9 10 FIELD LOCATION OF BORING: DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT: Sample ID Depth (Feet)USCS PROJECT: CLIENT: SITEADDRESS: LOGGED BY: DATES DRILLED: DRILLER: WATER LEVEL 1st Encountered Static SOILDESCRIPTION PAGE ___ OF ___ WELL / BORING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: Blow Count PID (ppm) Well Const.LithologyStart Finish TIME 11 12 14 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SampleBackfilled with neat cement 10931 De Anza Blvd. Cupertino, California BORING LOG BORING B2 DeAnza 10-10-18 ARTI ECA ( C - 5 7 # 6 9 5 9 7 0 ) 10931 DeAnza Blvd., Cupertino, CA11 SILTY SAND (SW): Reddish Brown (5YR4/3), estimated slightly damp, estimated loose to medium dense. Sand is fine to coarse. With trace gravels. SANDY GRAVEL (GW): Brown (7.5YR5/5), estimated slightly damp, estimated dense to very dense. Approximately 50% angular gravel up to 1 inch. Approximately 50% coarse sand. Increased gravel content (approximately 75%). 4-6” Concrete slab. NA NA Forrest Cook PG#8201 SW GW BOH = 10’ Backfilled with neat cement (Portland I/II) Geoprobe with Macrocore sampler B2-10 1 2 3 5 4 6 7 8 9 10 FIELD LOCATION OF BORING: DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT: Sample ID Depth (Feet)USCS PROJECT: CLIENT: SITEADDRESS: LOGGED BY: DATES DRILLED: DRILLER: WATER LEVEL 1st Encountered Static SOILDESCRIPTION PAGE ___ OF ___ WELL / BORING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: Blow Count PID (ppm) Well Const.LithologyStart Finish TIME 11 12 14 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SampleBackfilled with neat cement 10931 De Anza Blvd. Cupertino, California BORING LOG BORING B3 DeAnza 10-10-18 ARTI ECA ( C - 5 7 # 6 9 5 9 7 0 ) 10931 DeAnza Blvd., Cupertino, CA11 SILTY SAND (SW): Dark reddish Brown (5YR3/3), estimated slightly damp, estimated loose to medium dense. Sand is fine to coarse. With trace gravels. SANDY GRAVEL (GW): Brown (7.5YR5/5), estimated slightly damp, estimated very dense. Approximately 50% angular gravel up to 1.5 inch. Approximately 50% coarse sand. Increased gravel content (approximately 75%). 4-6” Concrete slab. NA NA Forrest Cook PG#8201 SW GW BOH = 10’ Backfilled with neat cement (Portland I/II) Geoprobe with Macrocore sampler B3-10 1 2 3 5 4 6 7 8 9 10 FIELD LOCATION OF BORING: DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT: Sample ID Depth (Feet)USCS PROJECT: CLIENT: SITEADDRESS: LOGGED BY: DATES DRILLED: DRILLER: WATER LEVEL 1st Encountered Static SOILDESCRIPTION PAGE ___ OF ___ WELL / BORING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: Blow Count PID (ppm) Well Const.LithologyStart Finish TIME 11 12 14 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SampleBackfilled with neat cement 10931 De Anza Blvd. Cupertino, California BORING LOG BORING B4 DeAnza 10-10-18 ARTI ECA ( C - 5 7 # 6 9 5 9 7 0 ) 10931 DeAnza Blvd., Cupertino, CA11 SILTY SAND (SW): Dark reddish Brown (5YR3/3), estimated slightly damp, estimated loose to medium dense. Sand is fine to coarse. With trace gravels. SANDY GRAVEL (GW): Brown (7.5YR5/5), estimated slightly damp, estimated very dense. Approximately 50% angular gravel up to 1.5 inch. Approximately 50% coarse sand. Increased gravel content (approximately 75%). 4-6” Concrete slab. NA NA Forrest Cook PG#8201 SW GW BOH = 10’ Backfilled with neat cement (Portland I/II) Geoprobe with Macrocore sampler B4-10 1 2 3 5 4 6 7 8 9 10 FIELD LOCATION OF BORING: DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT: Sample ID Depth (Feet)USCS PROJECT: CLIENT: SITEADDRESS: LOGGED BY: DATES DRILLED: DRILLER: WATER LEVEL 1st Encountered Static SOILDESCRIPTION PAGE ___ OF ___ WELL / BORING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: Blow Count PID (ppm) Well Const.LithologyStart Finish TIME 11 12 14 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SampleBackfilled with neat cement 10931 De Anza Blvd. Cupertino, California BORING LOG BORING B5 DeAnza 10-10-18 ARTI ECA ( C - 5 7 # 6 9 5 9 7 0 ) 10931 DeAnza Blvd., Cupertino, CA11 SILTY SAND (SW): Dark reddish Brown (5YR3/3), estimated slightly damp, estimated loose to medium dense. Sand is fine to coarse. With trace gravels. SANDY GRAVEL (GW): Brown (7.5YR5/5), estimated slightly damp, estimated very dense. Approximately 50% angular gravel up to 1.5 inch. Approximately 50% coarse sand. Increased gravel content (approximately 75%). 4-6” Concrete slab. NA NA Forrest Cook PG#8201 SW GW BOH = 10’ Backfilled with neat cement (Portland I/II) Geoprobe with Macrocore sampler B5-10 1 2 3 5 4 6 7 8 9 10 FIELD LOCATION OF BORING: DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT: Sample ID Depth (Feet)USCS PROJECT: CLIENT: SITEADDRESS: LOGGED BY: DATES DRILLED: DRILLER: WATER LEVEL 1st Encountered Static SOILDESCRIPTION PAGE ___ OF ___ WELL / BORING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: Blow Count PID (ppm) Well Const.LithologyStart Finish TIME 11 12 14 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SampleBackfilled with neat cement 10931 De Anza Blvd. Cupertino, California BORING LOG BORING B6 DeAnza 10-10-18 ARTI ECA ( C - 5 7 # 6 9 5 9 7 0 ) 10931 DeAnza Blvd., Cupertino, CA11 SILTY SAND (SW): Reddish Brown (5YR4/3), estimated slightly damp, estimated loose to medium dense. Sand is fine to coarse. With trace gravels. SANDY GRAVEL (GW): Brown (7.5YR5/5), estimated slightly damp, estimated very dense. Approximately 50% angular gravel up to 1.25 inch. Approximately 50% coarse sand. Increased gravel content (approximately 75%). 4-6” Concrete slab. NA NA Forrest Cook PG#8201 SW GW BOH = 10’ Backfilled with neat cement (Portland I/II) Geoprobe with Macrocore sampler B6-10 1 2 3 5 4 6 7 8 9 10 FIELD LOCATION OF BORING: DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT: Sample ID Depth (Feet)USCS PROJECT: CLIENT: SITEADDRESS: LOGGED BY: DATES DRILLED: DRILLER: WATER LEVEL 1st Encountered Static SOILDESCRIPTION PAGE ___ OF ___ WELL / BORING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: Blow Count PID (ppm) Well Const.LithologyStart Finish TIME 11 12 14 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SampleBackfilled with neat cement 10931 De Anza Blvd. Cupertino, California BORING LOG BORING B7 DeAnza 10-10-18 ARTI ECA ( C - 5 7 # 6 9 5 9 7 0 ) 10931 DeAnza Blvd., Cupertino, CA11 SILTY SAND (SW): Reddish Brown (5YR4/4), estimated slightly damp, estimated loose to medium dense. Sand is fine. With trace gravels. SANDY GRAVEL (GW): Brown (7.5YR4/4), estimated slightly damp, estimated dense to very dense. Approximately 50% angular gravel up to 1 inch. Approximately 50% coarse sand. Increased gravel content (approximately 75%). Landscaped Surface NA NA Forrest Cook PG#8201 SW GW BOH = 12’ Backfilled with neat cement (Portland I/II) Geoprobe with Macrocore sampler B7-12 1 2 3 5 4 6 7 8 9 10 FIELD LOCATION OF BORING: DRILLING METHOD AND EQUIPMENT: Sample ID Depth (Feet)USCS PROJECT: CLIENT: SITEADDRESS: LOGGED BY: DATES DRILLED: DRILLER: WATER LEVEL 1st Encountered Static SOILDESCRIPTION PAGE ___ OF ___ WELL / BORING CONSTRUCTION DETAILS: Blow Count PID (ppm) Well Const.LithologyStart Finish TIME 11 12 14 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SampleBackfilled with neat cement APPENDIX “B” GPR can't see PVC, Transite, cement, clay pipe in clay soil, any type of insulated line 185 10/8/2018-App Apri Ghuman Applied Remedial Technology G18- 10931 N.De Anza Blvd Apri Ghuman Asghuman888@yahoo.com Complete GPR & Locate 4 outside 6 insideUST search Cupertino, California Complete 4 10931 N.De Anza Blvd 4433 To be billed 415-816-2134 98301 Apri Ghuman 10/8/2018 GPR cart scans were conducted around perimeter of building to search for possible UST. NoUST was able to be detected. 6 bore locations were located inside garage area boxed withwhite chalk paint. Minimal markings was asked to be made by client. Locations inside werecleared by GPR cart ,passive power and radio scans, which no signatures were detected insidewhite boxed areas. 415-816-2134 G18-4433 Adam Lazaro 10/8/2018 8:00 AM 12:00 PM 4:00 4 Along entrance to each garage port there was an electrical utility detected, but was outside of white boxed boundary, so no markings were made. Area inside white boxes are clear.Vehicles inside working garage ports prevented full complete GPR cart scans to be conducted. 4 bore locations outside were marked by Apri with white dots near main entrance sideof building. Electrical line was marked with red paint near one location (see photos). Passive power and radio scans were conducted on outside locations and no new signaturesdetected other then one marked out in red paint. GPR cart scans were conducted on outside white dot locations and no anomalies/possible utilities were located other then markedred electrical line. Apri was unable to view final findings. APPENDIX “C” Laboratory Job Number 304062 ANALYTICAL REPORT Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Project : STANDARD 1485 Bayshore Blvd. #109 Location : De Anza Properties San Francisco, CA 94124 Level : II Sample ID Lab ID B7-12 304062-001 B1-10 304062-002 B2-10 304062-003 B3-10 304062-004 B4-10 304062-005 B5-10 304062-006 B6-10 304062-007 This data package has been reviewed for technical correctness and completeness. Release of this data has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or the Manager's designee, as verified by the following signature which applies to this PDF file as well as any associated electronic data deliverable files. The results contained in this report meet all requirements of NELAP and pertain only to those samples which were submitted for analysis. This report may be reproduced only in its entirety. Signature: Date: 10/26/2018 Will Rice Project Manager will.rice@enthalpy.com (510) 204-2221 Ext 13102 CA ELAP# 2896, NELAP# 4044-001 CASE NARRATIVE Laboratory number: 304062 Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Location: De Anza Properties Request Date: 10/10/18 Samples Received: 10/10/18 This data package contains sample and QC results for seven soil samples, requested for the above referenced project on 10/10/18. The samples were received cold and intact. TPH-Purgeables and/or BTXE by GC (EPA 8015B): No analytical problems were encountered. TPH-Extractables by GC (EPA 8015B): No analytical problems were encountered. Volatile Organics by GC/MS (EPA 8260B): No analytical problems were encountered. PCBs (EPA 8082): All samples underwent sulfuric acid cleanup using EPA Method 3665A. All samples underwent sulfur cleanup using the copper option in EPA Method 3660B. No analytical problems were encountered. Page 1 of 1 17.0 3 of 34 4 of 34 Detections Summary for 304062 Results for any subcontracted analyses are not included in this summary. Client : Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Project : STANDARD Location : De Anza Properties Client Sample ID : B7-12 Laboratory Sample ID : 304062-001 No Detections Client Sample ID : B1-10 Laboratory Sample ID : 304062-002 Analyte Result Flags RL Units Basis IDF Method Prep Method Diesel C10-C24 1.6 Y,Z 1.0 mg/Kg As Recd 1.000 EPA 8015B EPA 3550C Client Sample ID : B2-10 Laboratory Sample ID : 304062-003 Analyte Result Flags RL Units Basis IDF Method Prep Method Diesel C10-C24 4.2 Y,Z 0.99 mg/Kg As Recd 1.000 EPA 8015B EPA 3550C Client Sample ID : B3-10 Laboratory Sample ID : 304062-004 Analyte Result Flags RL Units Basis IDF Method Prep Method Diesel C10-C24 3.4 Y,Z 1.0 mg/Kg As Recd 1.000 EPA 8015B EPA 3550C Motor Oil C24-C36 5.8 Y,Z 5.0 mg/Kg As Recd 1.000 EPA 8015B EPA 3550C Client Sample ID : B4-10 Laboratory Sample ID : 304062-005 Analyte Result Flags RL Units Basis IDF Method Prep Method Diesel C10-C24 2.3 Y,Z 1.0 mg/Kg As Recd 1.000 EPA 8015B EPA 3550C Motor Oil C24-C36 8.8 Y,Z 5.0 mg/Kg As Recd 1.000 EPA 8015B EPA 3550C Client Sample ID : B5-10 Laboratory Sample ID : 304062-006 Analyte Result Flags RL Units Basis IDF Method Prep Method Diesel C10-C24 1.6 Y,Z 1.0 mg/Kg As Recd 1.000 EPA 8015B EPA 3550C Motor Oil C24-C36 7.7 Y,Z 5.0 mg/Kg As Recd 1.000 EPA 8015B EPA 3550C Client Sample ID : B6-10 Laboratory Sample ID : 304062-007 Analyte Result Flags RL Units Basis IDF Method Prep Method Diesel C10-C24 1.3 Y,Z 1.0 mg/Kg As Recd 1.000 EPA 8015B EPA 3550C Motor Oil C24-C36 7.0 Y,Z 5.0 mg/Kg As Recd 1.000 EPA 8015B EPA 3550C Page 1 of 2 19.0 Y = Sample exhibits chromatographic pattern which does not resemble standard Z = Sample exhibits unknown single peak or peaks Page 2 of 2 19.0 Total Volatile Hydrocarbons Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 5030B Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8015B Field ID: B7-12 Batch#: 264446 Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/10/18 Units: mg/Kg Received: 10/10/18 Basis: as received Analyzed: 10/11/18 Diln Fac: 1.000 Type: SAMPLE Lab ID: 304062-001 Analyte Result RL Gasoline C7-C12 ND 1.0 Surrogate %REC Limits Bromofluorobenzene (FID) 95 64-134 Type: BLANK Lab ID: QC951420 Analyte Result RL Gasoline C7-C12 ND 1.0 Surrogate %REC Limits Bromofluorobenzene (FID) 87 64-134 ND= Not Detected RL= Reporting Limit Page 1 of 1 2.0 Batch QC Report Total Volatile Hydrocarbons Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 5030B Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8015B Matrix: Soil Batch#: 264446 Units: mg/Kg Analyzed: 10/11/18 Diln Fac: 1.000 Type: BS Lab ID: QC951416 Analyte Spiked Result %REC Limits Gasoline C7-C12 1.000 0.9465 95 80-120 Surrogate %REC Limits Bromofluorobenzene (FID) 90 64-134 Type: BSD Lab ID: QC951417 Analyte Spiked Result %REC Limits RPD Lim Gasoline C7-C12 1.000 0.9924 99 80-120 5 20 Surrogate %REC Limits Bromofluorobenzene (FID) 101 64-134 RPD= Relative Percent Difference Page 1 of 1 3.0 Batch QC Report Total Volatile Hydrocarbons Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 5030B Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8015B Field ID: B7-12 Diln Fac: 1.000 MSS Lab ID: 304062-001 Batch#: 264446 Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/10/18 Units: mg/Kg Received: 10/10/18 Basis: as received Analyzed: 10/11/18 Type: MS Lab ID: QC951418 Analyte MSS Result Spiked Result %REC Limits Gasoline C7-C12 0.1096 9.346 7.590 80 46-120 Surrogate %REC Limits Bromofluorobenzene (FID) 102 64-134 Type: MSD Lab ID: QC951419 Analyte Spiked Result %REC Limits RPD Lim Gasoline C7-C12 10.31 8.287 79 46-120 1 33 Surrogate %REC Limits Bromofluorobenzene (FID) 104 64-134 RPD= Relative Percent Difference Page 1 of 1 4.0 Total Extractable Hydrocarbons Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 3550C Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8015B Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/10/18 Units: mg/Kg Received: 10/10/18 Basis: as received Prepared: 10/12/18 Diln Fac: 1.000 Analyzed: 10/12/18 Batch#: 264499 Field ID: B7-12 Lab ID: 304062-001 Type: SAMPLE Analyte Result RL Diesel C10-C24 ND 0.99 Motor Oil C24-C36 ND 5.0 Surrogate %REC Limits o-Terphenyl 106 59-130 Field ID: B1-10 Lab ID: 304062-002 Type: SAMPLE Analyte Result RL Diesel C10-C24 1.6 Y Z 1.0 Motor Oil C24-C36 ND 5.0 Surrogate %REC Limits o-Terphenyl 97 59-130 Field ID: B2-10 Lab ID: 304062-003 Type: SAMPLE Analyte Result RL Diesel C10-C24 4.2 Y Z 0.99 Motor Oil C24-C36 ND 5.0 Surrogate %REC Limits o-Terphenyl 96 59-130 Field ID: B3-10 Lab ID: 304062-004 Type: SAMPLE Analyte Result RL Diesel C10-C24 3.4 Y Z 1.0 Motor Oil C24-C36 5.8 Y Z 5.0 Surrogate %REC Limits o-Terphenyl 109 59-130 Y= Sample exhibits chromatographic pattern which does not resemble standard Z= Sample exhibits unknown single peak or peaks ND= Not Detected RL= Reporting Limit Page 1 of 2 5.0 Total Extractable Hydrocarbons Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 3550C Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8015B Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/10/18 Units: mg/Kg Received: 10/10/18 Basis: as received Prepared: 10/12/18 Diln Fac: 1.000 Analyzed: 10/12/18 Batch#: 264499 Field ID: B4-10 Lab ID: 304062-005 Type: SAMPLE Analyte Result RL Diesel C10-C24 2.3 Y Z 1.0 Motor Oil C24-C36 8.8 Y Z 5.0 Surrogate %REC Limits o-Terphenyl 95 59-130 Field ID: B5-10 Lab ID: 304062-006 Type: SAMPLE Analyte Result RL Diesel C10-C24 1.6 Y Z 1.0 Motor Oil C24-C36 7.7 Y Z 5.0 Surrogate %REC Limits o-Terphenyl 115 59-130 Field ID: B6-10 Lab ID: 304062-007 Type: SAMPLE Analyte Result RL Diesel C10-C24 1.3 Y Z 1.0 Motor Oil C24-C36 7.0 Y Z 5.0 Surrogate %REC Limits o-Terphenyl 101 59-130 Type: BLANK Lab ID: QC951636 Analyte Result RL Diesel C10-C24 ND 1.0 Motor Oil C24-C36 ND 5.0 Surrogate %REC Limits o-Terphenyl 97 59-130 Y= Sample exhibits chromatographic pattern which does not resemble standard Z= Sample exhibits unknown single peak or peaks ND= Not Detected RL= Reporting Limit Page 2 of 2 5.0 Batch QC Report Total Extractable Hydrocarbons Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 3550C Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8015B Type: LCS Diln Fac: 1.000 Lab ID: QC951637 Batch#: 264499 Matrix: Soil Prepared: 10/12/18 Units: mg/Kg Analyzed: 10/12/18 Analyte Spiked Result %REC Limits Diesel C10-C24 50.00 56.26 113 56-137 Surrogate %REC Limits o-Terphenyl 117 59-130 Page 1 of 1 6.0 Batch QC Report Total Extractable Hydrocarbons Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 3550C Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8015B Field ID: B3-10 Batch#: 264499 MSS Lab ID: 304062-004 Sampled: 10/10/18 Matrix: Soil Received: 10/10/18 Units: mg/Kg Prepared: 10/12/18 Basis: as received Analyzed: 10/12/18 Diln Fac: 1.000 Type: MS Lab ID: QC951638 Analyte MSS Result Spiked Result %REC Limits Diesel C10-C24 3.371 50.37 47.56 88 52-128 Surrogate %REC Limits o-Terphenyl 108 59-130 Type: MSD Lab ID: QC951639 Analyte Spiked Result %REC Limits RPD Lim Diesel C10-C24 50.32 44.75 82 52-128 6 42 Surrogate %REC Limits o-Terphenyl 104 59-130 RPD= Relative Percent Difference Page 1 of 1 7.0 Minutes 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Name \\kraken\gdrive\ezchrom\Projects\GC27\Data\2018\285a021.dat, Front Signal Minutes 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Name \\kraken\gdrive\ezchrom\Projects\GC27\Data\2018\285a022.dat, Front Signal Minutes 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Name \\kraken\gdrive\ezchrom\Projects\GC27\Data\2018\285a017.dat, Front Signal Minutes 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Name \\kraken\gdrive\ezchrom\Projects\GC27\Data\2018\285a023.dat, Front Signal Minutes 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Name \\kraken\gdrive\ezchrom\Projects\GC27\Data\2018\285a024.dat, Front Signal Minutes 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Name \\kraken\gdrive\ezchrom\Projects\GC27\Data\2018\285a025.dat, Front Signal Minutes 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Name \\kraken\gdrive\ezchrom\Projects\GC27\Data\2018\285a012.dat, Front Signal Minutes 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Name \\kraken\gdrive\ezchrom\Projects\GC27\Data\2018\285a013.dat, Front Signal Purgeable Organics by GC/MS Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 5030B Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8260B Field ID: B7-12 Diln Fac: 0.9862 Lab ID: 304062-001 Batch#: 264469 Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/10/18 Units: ug/Kg Received: 10/10/18 Basis: as received Analyzed: 10/12/18 Analyte Result RL Freon 12 ND 9.9 Chloromethane ND 9.9 Vinyl Chloride ND 9.9 Bromomethane ND 9.9 Chloroethane ND 9.9 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 4.9 Acetone ND 20 Freon 113 ND 4.9 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 4.9 Methylene Chloride ND 20 Carbon Disulfide ND 4.9 MTBE ND 4.9 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 4.9 Vinyl Acetate ND 49 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 4.9 2-Butanone ND 9.9 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 4.9 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 4.9 Chloroform ND 4.9 Bromochloromethane ND 4.9 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 4.9 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 4.9 Carbon Tetrachloride ND 4.9 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 4.9 Benzene ND 4.9 Trichloroethene ND 4.9 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 4.9 Bromodichloromethane ND 4.9 Dibromomethane ND 4.9 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone ND 9.9 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 4.9 Toluene ND 4.9 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 4.9 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 4.9 2-Hexanone ND 9.9 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 4.9 Tetrachloroethene ND 4.9 ND= Not Detected RL= Reporting Limit Page 1 of 2 13.0 Purgeable Organics by GC/MS Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 5030B Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8260B Field ID: B7-12 Diln Fac: 0.9862 Lab ID: 304062-001 Batch#: 264469 Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/10/18 Units: ug/Kg Received: 10/10/18 Basis: as received Analyzed: 10/12/18 Analyte Result RL Dibromochloromethane ND 4.9 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 4.9 Chlorobenzene ND 4.9 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 4.9 Ethylbenzene ND 4.9 m,p-Xylenes ND 4.9 o-Xylene ND 4.9 Styrene ND 4.9 Bromoform ND 4.9 Isopropylbenzene ND 4.9 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 4.9 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 4.9 Propylbenzene ND 4.9 Bromobenzene ND 4.9 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 4.9 2-Chlorotoluene ND 4.9 4-Chlorotoluene ND 4.9 tert-Butylbenzene ND 4.9 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 4.9 sec-Butylbenzene ND 4.9 para-Isopropyl Toluene ND 4.9 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 4.9 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 4.9 n-Butylbenzene ND 4.9 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 4.9 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND 4.9 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 4.9 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 4.9 Naphthalene ND 4.9 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 4.9 Surrogate %REC Limits Dibromofluoromethane 109 79-127 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 122 73-139 Toluene-d8 101 80-120 Bromofluorobenzene 117 80-127 ND= Not Detected RL= Reporting Limit Page 2 of 2 13.0 Batch QC Report Purgeable Organics by GC/MS Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 5030B Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8260B Matrix: Soil Batch#: 264469 Units: ug/Kg Analyzed: 10/12/18 Diln Fac: 1.000 Type: BS Lab ID: QC951509 Analyte Spiked Result %REC Limits 1,1-Dichloroethene 25.00 27.65 111 68-140 Benzene 25.00 22.54 90 74-123 Trichloroethene 25.00 27.09 108 72-125 Toluene 25.00 25.44 102 73-121 Chlorobenzene 25.00 26.34 105 76-123 Surrogate %REC Limits Dibromofluoromethane 114 79-127 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 121 73-139 Toluene-d8 102 80-120 Bromofluorobenzene 117 80-127 Type: BSD Lab ID: QC951510 Analyte Spiked Result %REC Limits RPD Lim 1,1-Dichloroethene 25.00 25.80 103 68-140 7 25 Benzene 25.00 20.93 84 74-123 7 22 Trichloroethene 25.00 25.90 104 72-125 4 23 Toluene 25.00 24.56 98 73-121 3 22 Chlorobenzene 25.00 24.94 100 76-123 5 20 Surrogate %REC Limits Dibromofluoromethane 112 79-127 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 123 73-139 Toluene-d8 102 80-120 Bromofluorobenzene 115 80-127 RPD= Relative Percent Difference Page 1 of 1 14.0 Batch QC Report Purgeable Organics by GC/MS Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 5030B Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8260B Type: BLANK Diln Fac: 1.000 Lab ID: QC951511 Batch#: 264469 Matrix: Soil Analyzed: 10/12/18 Units: ug/Kg Analyte Result RL Freon 12 ND 10 Chloromethane ND 10 Vinyl Chloride ND 10 Bromomethane ND 10 Chloroethane ND 10 Trichlorofluoromethane ND 5.0 Acetone ND 20 Freon 113 ND 5.0 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 Methylene Chloride ND 20 Carbon Disulfide ND 5.0 MTBE ND 5.0 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 Vinyl Acetate ND 50 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 2-Butanone ND 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 5.0 2,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 Chloroform ND 5.0 Bromochloromethane ND 5.0 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 5.0 1,1-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 Carbon Tetrachloride ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 5.0 Benzene ND 5.0 Trichloroethene ND 5.0 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 Bromodichloromethane ND 5.0 Dibromomethane ND 5.0 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone ND 10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 Toluene ND 5.0 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 5.0 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 5.0 2-Hexanone ND 10 1,3-Dichloropropane ND 5.0 Tetrachloroethene ND 5.0 ND= Not Detected RL= Reporting Limit Page 1 of 2 15.0 Batch QC Report Purgeable Organics by GC/MS Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 5030B Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8260B Type: BLANK Diln Fac: 1.000 Lab ID: QC951511 Batch#: 264469 Matrix: Soil Analyzed: 10/12/18 Units: ug/Kg Analyte Result RL Dibromochloromethane ND 5.0 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 5.0 Chlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 Ethylbenzene ND 5.0 m,p-Xylenes ND 5.0 o-Xylene ND 5.0 Styrene ND 5.0 Bromoform ND 5.0 Isopropylbenzene ND 5.0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 5.0 1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 5.0 Propylbenzene ND 5.0 Bromobenzene ND 5.0 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.0 2-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 4-Chlorotoluene ND 5.0 tert-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 5.0 sec-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 para-Isopropyl Toluene ND 5.0 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 n-Butylbenzene ND 5.0 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 5.0 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane ND 5.0 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 Hexachlorobutadiene ND 5.0 Naphthalene ND 5.0 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 5.0 Surrogate %REC Limits Dibromofluoromethane 113 79-127 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 126 73-139 Toluene-d8 102 80-120 Bromofluorobenzene 118 80-127 ND= Not Detected RL= Reporting Limit Page 2 of 2 15.0 Batch QC Report Purgeable Organics by GC/MS Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 5030B Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8260B Field ID: B7-12 Batch#: 264469 MSS Lab ID: 304062-001 Sampled: 10/10/18 Matrix: Soil Received: 10/10/18 Units: ug/Kg Analyzed: 10/15/18 Basis: as received Type: MS Diln Fac: 0.9381 Lab ID: QC951634 Analyte MSS Result Spiked Result %REC Limits 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.9267 46.90 49.37 105 67-137 Benzene <0.8898 46.90 38.28 82 60-123 Trichloroethene <0.8236 46.90 49.10 105 51-143 Toluene <0.7015 46.90 44.48 95 53-120 Chlorobenzene <0.6766 46.90 44.85 96 48-120 Surrogate %REC Limits Dibromofluoromethane 115 79-127 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 128 73-139 Toluene-d8 102 80-120 Bromofluorobenzene 120 80-127 Type: MSD Diln Fac: 0.9346 Lab ID: QC951635 Analyte Spiked Result %REC Limits RPD Lim 1,1-Dichloroethene 46.73 59.01 126 67-137 18 36 Benzene 46.73 44.94 96 60-123 16 34 Trichloroethene 46.73 56.23 120 51-143 14 37 Toluene 46.73 50.42 108 53-120 13 34 Chlorobenzene 46.73 52.03 111 48-120 15 36 Surrogate %REC Limits Dibromofluoromethane 111 79-127 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 125 73-139 Toluene-d8 99 80-120 Bromofluorobenzene 118 80-127 RPD= Relative Percent Difference Page 1 of 1 16.0 Enthalpy Analytical - Berkeley Analytical Report Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 3546 Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8082 Matrix: Soil Diln Fac: 1.000 Units: ug/Kg Sampled: 10/10/18 Basis: as received Received: 10/10/18 Field ID: B7-12 Batch#: 264460 Type: SAMPLE Prepared: 10/11/18 Lab ID: 304062-001 Analyzed: 10/15/18 Analyte Result RL Aroclor-1016 ND 12 Aroclor-1221 ND 24 Aroclor-1232 ND 12 Aroclor-1242 ND 12 Aroclor-1248 ND 12 Aroclor-1254 ND 12 Aroclor-1260 ND 12 Surrogate %REC Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 108 37-170 Field ID: B1-10 Batch#: 264864 Type: SAMPLE Prepared: 10/25/18 Lab ID: 304062-002 Analyzed: 10/25/18 Analyte Result RL Aroclor-1016 ND 12 Aroclor-1221 ND 24 Aroclor-1232 ND 12 Aroclor-1242 ND 12 Aroclor-1248 ND 12 Aroclor-1254 ND 12 Aroclor-1260 ND 12 Surrogate %REC Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 91 37-170 Field ID: B2-10 Batch#: 264864 Type: SAMPLE Prepared: 10/25/18 Lab ID: 304062-003 Analyzed: 10/25/18 Analyte Result RL Aroclor-1016 ND 12 Aroclor-1221 ND 24 Aroclor-1232 ND 12 Aroclor-1242 ND 12 Aroclor-1248 ND 12 Aroclor-1254 ND 12 Aroclor-1260 ND 12 Surrogate %REC Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 98 37-170 ND= Not Detected RL= Reporting Limit Page 1 of 3 10.1 Enthalpy Analytical - Berkeley Analytical Report Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 3546 Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8082 Matrix: Soil Diln Fac: 1.000 Units: ug/Kg Sampled: 10/10/18 Basis: as received Received: 10/10/18 Field ID: B3-10 Batch#: 264864 Type: SAMPLE Prepared: 10/25/18 Lab ID: 304062-004 Analyzed: 10/25/18 Analyte Result RL Aroclor-1016 ND 12 Aroclor-1221 ND 24 Aroclor-1232 ND 12 Aroclor-1242 ND 12 Aroclor-1248 ND 12 Aroclor-1254 ND 12 Aroclor-1260 ND 12 Surrogate %REC Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 98 37-170 Field ID: B4-10 Batch#: 264864 Type: SAMPLE Prepared: 10/25/18 Lab ID: 304062-005 Analyzed: 10/25/18 Analyte Result RL Aroclor-1016 ND 12 Aroclor-1221 ND 24 Aroclor-1232 ND 12 Aroclor-1242 ND 12 Aroclor-1248 ND 12 Aroclor-1254 ND 12 Aroclor-1260 ND 12 Surrogate %REC Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 72 37-170 Field ID: B5-10 Batch#: 264864 Type: SAMPLE Prepared: 10/25/18 Lab ID: 304062-006 Analyzed: 10/25/18 Analyte Result RL Aroclor-1016 ND 12 Aroclor-1221 ND 24 Aroclor-1232 ND 12 Aroclor-1242 ND 12 Aroclor-1248 ND 12 Aroclor-1254 ND 12 Aroclor-1260 ND 12 Surrogate %REC Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 105 37-170 ND= Not Detected RL= Reporting Limit Page 2 of 3 10.1 Enthalpy Analytical - Berkeley Analytical Report Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 3546 Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8082 Matrix: Soil Diln Fac: 1.000 Units: ug/Kg Sampled: 10/10/18 Basis: as received Received: 10/10/18 Field ID: B6-10 Batch#: 264864 Type: SAMPLE Prepared: 10/25/18 Lab ID: 304062-007 Analyzed: 10/25/18 Analyte Result RL Aroclor-1016 ND 12 Aroclor-1221 ND 24 Aroclor-1232 ND 12 Aroclor-1242 ND 12 Aroclor-1248 ND 12 Aroclor-1254 ND 12 Aroclor-1260 ND 12 Surrogate %REC Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 90 37-170 Type: BLANK Prepared: 10/11/18 Lab ID: QC951464 Analyzed: 10/12/18 Batch#: 264460 Analyte Result RL Aroclor-1016 ND 12 Aroclor-1221 ND 24 Aroclor-1232 ND 12 Aroclor-1242 ND 12 Aroclor-1248 ND 12 Aroclor-1254 ND 12 Aroclor-1260 ND 12 Surrogate %REC Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 90 37-170 Type: BLANK Prepared: 10/25/18 Lab ID: QC953108 Analyzed: 10/25/18 Batch#: 264864 Cleanup Method: EPA 3620 Analyte Result RL Aroclor-1016 ND 12 Aroclor-1221 ND 24 Aroclor-1232 ND 12 Aroclor-1242 ND 12 Aroclor-1248 ND 12 Aroclor-1254 ND 12 Aroclor-1260 ND 12 Surrogate %REC Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 84 37-170 ND= Not Detected RL= Reporting Limit Page 3 of 3 10.1 Batch QC Report Enthalpy Analytical - Berkeley Analytical Report Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 3546 Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8082 Type: LCS Diln Fac: 1.000 Lab ID: QC951465 Batch#: 264460 Matrix: Soil Prepared: 10/11/18 Units: ug/Kg Analyzed: 10/12/18 Analyte Spiked Result %REC Limits Aroclor-1016 125.0 145.9 117 59-160 Aroclor-1260 125.0 142.8 114 59-170 Surrogate %REC Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 116 37-170 Page 1 of 1 11.0 Batch QC Report Enthalpy Analytical - Berkeley Analytical Report Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 3546 Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8082 Field ID: ZZZZZZZZZZ Batch#: 264460 MSS Lab ID: 304053-006 Sampled: 09/26/18 Matrix: Soil Received: 10/10/18 Units: ug/Kg Prepared: 10/11/18 Basis: as received Analyzed: 10/12/18 Diln Fac: 5.000 Type: MS Lab ID: QC951466 Analyte MSS Result Spiked Result %REC Limits Aroclor-1016 <18.03 164.7 207.4 126 73-167 Aroclor-1260 <22.61 164.7 198.8 121 57-178 Surrogate %REC Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 113 37-170 Type: MSD Lab ID: QC951467 Analyte Spiked Result %REC Limits RPD Lim Aroclor-1016 164.8 191.0 116 73-167 8 40 Aroclor-1260 164.8 245.3 149 57-178 21 41 Surrogate %REC Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 149 37-170 RPD= Relative Percent Difference Page 1 of 1 12.0 Batch QC Report Enthalpy Analytical - Berkeley Analytical Report Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 3546 Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8082 Type: LCS Diln Fac: 1.000 Lab ID: QC953112 Batch#: 264864 Matrix: Soil Prepared: 10/25/18 Units: ug/Kg Analyzed: 10/25/18 Analyte Spiked Result %REC Limits Aroclor-1016 125.0 97.18 78 59-160 Aroclor-1260 125.0 100.4 80 59-170 Surrogate %REC Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 84 37-170 Page 1 of 1 21.0 Batch QC Report Enthalpy Analytical - Berkeley Analytical Report Lab #: 304062 Location: De Anza Properties Client: Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. Prep: EPA 3546 Project#: STANDARD Analysis: EPA 8082 Field ID: B4-10 Batch#: 264864 MSS Lab ID: 304062-005 Sampled: 10/10/18 Matrix: Soil Received: 10/10/18 Units: ug/Kg Prepared: 10/25/18 Basis: as received Analyzed: 10/25/18 Diln Fac: 1.000 Type: MS Lab ID: QC953113 Analyte MSS Result Spiked Result %REC Limits Aroclor-1016 <4.384 166.7 149.5 90 73-167 Aroclor-1260 <3.194 166.7 160.2 96 57-178 Surrogate %REC Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 100 37-170 Type: MSD Lab ID: QC953114 Analyte Spiked Result %REC Limits RPD Lim Aroclor-1016 164.7 157.3 96 73-167 6 40 Aroclor-1260 164.7 153.3 93 57-178 3 41 Surrogate %REC Limits Decachlorobiphenyl 96 37-170 RPD= Relative Percent Difference Page 1 of 1 22.0 Laboratory Job Number 304063 ANALYTICAL REPORT Almar Environmental Project : 983-01 407 Almar Avenue Location : DeAnza Properties Santa Cruz, CA 95060 Level : II Sample ID Lab ID B7-11.5 304063-001 B7-8.0 304063-002 This data package has been reviewed for technical correctness and completeness. Release of this data has been authorized by the Laboratory Manager or the Manager's designee, as verified by the following signature which applies to this PDF file as well as any associated electronic data deliverable files. The results contained in this report meet all requirements of NELAP and pertain only to those samples which were submitted for analysis. This report may be reproduced only in its entirety. Signature: Date: 10/25/2018 Will Rice Project Manager will.rice@enthalpy.com (510) 204-2221 Ext 13102 CA ELAP# 2896, NELAP# 4044-001 CASE NARRATIVE Laboratory number: 304063 Client: Almar Environmental Project: 983-01 Location: DeAnza Properties Request Date: 10/10/18 Samples Received: 10/10/18 This data package contains sample and QC results for two air samples, requested for the above referenced project on 10/10/18. The samples were received cold and intact. Volatile Organics in Air by MS (EPA TO-15): No analytical problems were encountered. Volatile Organics in Air GC (ASTM D1946-90): No analytical problems were encountered. Page 1 of 1 5.0 3 of 18 4 of 18 Laboratory Job Number 304063 Subcontracted Products Enthalpy Analytical (Orange) 5 of 18 Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to your company. Please feel free to call if there are any questions regarding this report or if we can be of further service. NOTE: Unless notified in writing, all samples will be discarded by appropriate disposal protocol 60 days from date received. The reports of the Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. are confidential property of our clients and may not be reproduced or used for publication in part or in full without our written permission. This is for the mutual protection of the public, our clients, and ourselves. Preliminary report generated by: Lisa Nguyen, PM Lab Request 407664, Page 1 of 690618-PRELIMINARY REPORT Client:Enthalpy - Berkeley Will Rice Address:2323 Fifth Street Berkeley, CA 94710 Lab Request: 407664 Report Date: 10/25/2018 Date Received: 10/19/2018 This laboratory request covers the following listed samples which were analyzed for the parameters indicated on the attached Analytical Result Report. All analyses were conducted using the appropriate methods. Methods accredited by NELAC are indicated on the report. This cover letter is an integral part of the final report. Project Number: 304063 Site: DeAnza Properties Comments: Attn: Client ID: 15279 Enthalpy Analytical, LLC 931 W. Barkley Ave - Orange, CA 92868 www.enthalpy.com info-sc@enthalpy.com Tel: (714)771-6900 Fax: (714)538-1209 NELAP:04232CA | ELAP:1338 Please use the data with caution as the results are preliminary and they have not undergone complete QC validation and/or second party review. The data is subject to change upon final review. PRELIMINARY Sample # Client Sample ID 407664-002 B7-8.0 6 of 18 Analyte Prepared AnalyzedDFRDLUnitsResultMDL Notes Sample #:407664-002 Sampled:10/10/2018 12:30 Site: B7-8.0Client Sample #: Matrix:Air Collector:ClientClient:Enthalpy - Berkeley Sample Type: By Method: EPA TO-15 Prep Method: Method QCBatchID: QC1196837 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 1 10/19/18 21:255.5 ug/m31.1 ZZ 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 1 10/19/18 21:256.9 ug/m31.38 ZZ 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 1 10/19/18 21:255.5 ug/m31.1 ZZ 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND 1 10/19/18 21:257.7 ug/m31.54 ZZ 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 1 10/19/18 21:254.1 ug/m30.82 ZZ 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 1 10/19/18 21:254 ug/m30.8 ZZ 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1 10/19/18 21:257.4 ug/m31.48 ZZ 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.8 1 10/19/18 21:254.9 ug/m30.98J JZZ 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 1 10/19/18 21:257.7 ug/m31.54 ZZ 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane ND 1 10/19/18 21:257 ug/m31.4 ZZ 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 1 10/19/18 21:256 ug/m31.2 ZZ 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 1 10/19/18 21:254.1 ug/m30.82 ZZ 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 1 10/19/18 21:254.6 ug/m30.92 ZZ 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 1 10/19/18 21:254.9 ug/m30.98 ZZ 1,3-Butadiene ND 1 10/19/18 21:252.2 ug/m30.44 ZZ 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1 10/19/18 21:256 ug/m31.2 ZZ 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 1 10/19/18 21:256 ug/m31.2 ZZ 2-Butanone (MEK)ND 1 10/19/18 21:2514.8 ug/m37.4 ZZ 2-Hexanone ND 1 10/19/18 21:254.1 ug/m30.82 ZZ 4-Ethyltoluene 1.1 1 10/19/18 21:254.9 ug/m30.98J JZZ 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)4.2 1 10/19/18 21:254.1 ug/m30.82 ZZ Acetone 32.7 1 10/19/18 21:2511.8 ug/m35.9 ZZ Benzene 13.2 1 10/19/18 21:253.2 ug/m30.64 ZZ Benzyl Chloride ND 1 10/19/18 21:255.2 ug/m31.04 ZZ Bromodichloromethane ND 1 10/19/18 21:256.7 ug/m31.34 ZZ Bromoform ND 1 10/19/18 21:2510.3 ug/m32.06 ZZ Bromomethane ND 1 10/19/18 21:253.9 ug/m30.78 ZZ Carbon disulfide ND 1 10/19/18 21:253.1 ug/m30.62 ZZ Carbon Tetrachloride ND 1 10/19/18 21:256.3 ug/m31.26 ZZ Chlorobenzene ND 1 10/19/18 21:254.6 ug/m30.92 ZZ Chloroethane ND 1 10/19/18 21:252.6 ug/m30.52 ZZ Chloroform ND 1 10/19/18 21:254.9 ug/m30.98 ZZ Chloromethane ND 1 10/19/18 21:252.1 ug/m30.42 ZZ cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1 10/19/18 21:254 ug/m30.8 ZZ cis-1,3-dichloropropene ND 1 10/19/18 21:254.5 ug/m30.9 ZZ Dichlorodifluoromethane ND 1 10/19/18 21:254.9 ug/m30.98 ZZ Ethylbenzene 1.8 1 10/19/18 21:254.3 ug/m30.86J JZZ Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1 10/19/18 21:2510.7 ug/m32.14 ZZ Isopropyl alcohol (IPA)ND 1 10/19/18 21:2512.2 ug/m36.1 ZZ m and p-Xylene 5.9 1 10/19/18 21:254.3 ug/m30.86 ZZ Methylene chloride ND 1 10/19/18 21:253.5 ug/m30.7 ZZ Methyl-t-butyl Ether (MTBE)ND 1 10/19/18 21:253.6 ug/m30.72 ZZ o-Xylene 2.4 1 10/19/18 21:254.3 ug/m30.86J JZZ Styrene ND 1 10/19/18 21:254.3 ug/m30.86 ZZ Tetrachloroethene 4.2 1 10/19/18 21:256.8 ug/m31.36J JZZ Toluene 13.1 1 10/19/18 21:253.8 ug/m30.76 ZZ trans-1,2-dichloroethene ND 1 10/19/18 21:254 ug/m30.8 ZZ trans-1,3-dichloropropene ND 1 10/19/18 21:254 ug/m30.8 ZZ Trichloroethene 5.5 1 10/19/18 21:255.4 ug/m31.08 ZZ Trichlorofluoromethane ND 1 10/19/18 21:255.6 ug/m31.12 ZZ Vinyl acetate ND 1 10/19/18 21:2517.6 ug/m38.8 ZZ Vinyl Chloride ND 1 10/19/18 21:252.6 ug/m30.52 ZZ Xylenes (Total)8.3 1 10/19/18 21:254.3 ug/m30.86 ZZ Lab Request 407664, Page 2 of 690618-PRELIMINARY REPORT Enthalpy Analytical, LLC PRELIMINARY RESULTS 7 of 18 Analyte Prepared AnalyzedDFRDLUnitsResultMDL Notes Sample #:407664-002 Sampled:10/10/2018 12:30 Site: B7-8.0Client Sample #: Matrix:Air Collector:ClientClient:Enthalpy - Berkeley Sample Type: By Surrogate % Recovery Limits Notes 4-Bromofluorobenzene (SUR)117 60-140 4-Bromofluorobenzene (SUR)117 60-140 Lab Request 407664, Page 3 of 690618-PRELIMINARY REPORT Enthalpy Analytical, LLC PRELIMINARY RESULTS 8 of 18 QCBatchID: QC1196837 Matrix:Air Analyst:nicollez Instrument:VOA-MS (group)Analyzed:10/18/2018 Method:EPA TO-15 Blank Summary Analyte Result Units NotesRDL Blank MDL QC1196837MB1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND Vppb 10.2 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND Vppb 10.2 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND Vppb 10.2 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND Vppb 10.2 1,1-Dichloroethane ND Vppb 10.2 1,1-Dichloroethene ND Vppb 10.2 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND Vppb 10.2 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND Vppb 10.2 1,2-Dibromoethane ND Vppb 10.2 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane ND Vppb 10.2 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND Vppb 10.2 1,2-Dichloroethane ND Vppb 10.2 1,2-Dichloropropane ND Vppb 10.2 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND Vppb 10.2 1,3-Butadiene ND Vppb 10.2 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND Vppb 10.2 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND Vppb 10.2 1,4-Dioxane ND Vppb 10.2 2-Butanone (MEK)ND Vppb 52.5 2-Hexanone ND Vppb 10.2 4-Ethyltoluene ND Vppb 10.2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ND Vppb 10.2 Acetone ND Vppb 52.5 Benzene ND Vppb 11 Benzyl Chloride ND Vppb 10.2 Bromodichloromethane ND Vppb 10.2 Bromoform ND Vppb 10.2 Bromomethane ND Vppb 10.2 Carbon disulfide ND Vppb 10.2 Carbon Tetrachloride 0.4 Vppb 10.2J Chlorobenzene ND Vppb 10.2 Chlorodibromomethane ND Vppb 10.2 Chloroethane ND Vppb 10.2 Chloroform 0.3 Vppb 10.2J Chloromethane ND Vppb 10.2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND Vppb 10.2 cis-1,3-dichloropropene ND Vppb 10.2 Cyclohexane ND Vppb 10.2 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND Vppb 10.2 Ethanol ND Vppb 52.5 Ethyl Acetate ND Vppb 20.2 Ethylbenzene ND Vppb 11 Heptane ND Vppb 10.2 Hexachlorobutadiene ND Vppb 10.2 Hexane ND Vppb 10.2 Isopropyl alcohol (IPA)ND Vppb 52.5 m and p-Xylene ND Vppb 11 Methylene chloride ND Vppb 10.2 Methyl-t-butyl Ether (MTBE)ND Vppb 11 o-Xylene ND Vppb 11 Propene ND Vppb 10.2 Styrene ND Vppb 10.2 Lab Request 407664, Page 4 of 690618-PRELIMINARY REPORT Enthalpy Analytical, LLC PRELIMINARY RESULTS 9 of 18 QCBatchID: QC1196837 Matrix:Air Analyst:nicollez Instrument:VOA-MS (group)Analyzed:10/18/2018 Method:EPA TO-15 . Analyte Result Units NotesRDL Blank MDL QC1196837MB1 Tetrachloroethene ND Vppb 10.2 Toluene ND Vppb 11 trans-1,2-dichloroethene ND Vppb 10.2 trans-1,3-dichloropropene ND Vppb 10.2 Trichloroethene ND Vppb 10.2 Trichlorofluoromethane ND Vppb 10.2 Vinyl acetate ND Vppb 52.5 Vinyl Chloride ND Vppb 10.2 Xylenes (Total)ND Vppb 11 Duplicate Summary Analyte Amount Units RPD RPD LimitsSample Amount Duplicate Notes QC1196837DUP1 Source: 407630-001 Benzene 1410 1530 Vppb 8.2 20 Ethylbenzene 1040 1000 Vppb 3.9 20 m and p-Xylene 3830 3750 Vppb 2.1 20 Methyl-t-butyl Ether (MTBE)4250 4270 Vppb 0.5 20 o-Xylene 1240 1220 Vppb 1.6 20 Toluene 2250 2280 Vppb 1.3 20 Xylenes (Total)5070 4970 Vppb 2.0 20 Lab Request 407664, Page 5 of 690618-PRELIMINARY REPORT Enthalpy Analytical, LLC PRELIMINARY RESULTS 10 of 18 Data Qualifiers and Definitions Qualifiers A See Report Comments. B Analyte was present in an associated method blank. B1 Analyte was present in a sample and associated method blank greater than MDL but less than RDL. BQ1 No valid test replicates. Sample Toxicity is possible. Best result was reported. BQ2 No valid test replicates. BQ3 No valid test replicates. Final DO is less than 1.0 mg/L. Result may be greater. BQ4 Minor Dissolved Oxygen loss was observed in the blank water check, however, the LCS was within criteria, validating the batch. BQ5 Minor Dissolved Oxygen loss was observed in the blank water check. C Possible laboratory contamination. D RPD was not within control limits. The sample data was reported without further clarification. D1 Lesser amount of sample was used due to insufficient amount of sample supplied. D2 Reporting limit is elevated due to sample matrix. Target analyte was not detected above the elevated reporting limit. D3 Insufficient sample was supplied for TCLP. Client was notified. TCLP was performed per the Client’s instructions. DW Sample result is calculated on a dry weigh basis. E Concentration is estimated because it exceeds the quantification limits of the method. I The sample was read outside of the method required incubation period. IR Inconclusive Result. Legionella is present, however, there is possible non-specific agglutination preventing specific identification. J Reported value is estimated L The laboratory control sample (LCS) or laboratory control sample duplicate (LCSD) was out of control limits. Associated sample data was reported with qualifier. L2 LCS did not meet recovery criteria, however, the MS and/or MSD met LCS recovery criteria, validating the batch. M The matrix spike (MS) or matrix spike duplicate (MSD) was not within control limits due to matrix interference. The associated LCS and/or LCSD was within control limits and the sample data was reported without further clarification. M1 The matrix spike (MS) or matrix spike duplicate (MSD) is not within control limits due to matrix interference. M2 The matrix spike (MS) or matrix spike duplicate (MSD) was not within control limits. The associated LCS and/or LCSD was not within control limits. Sample result is estimated. N1 Sample chromatography does not match the specified TPH standard pattern. NC The analyte concentration in the sample exceeded the spike level by a factor of four or greater, spike recovery and limits do not apply. P Sample was received without proper preservation according to EPA guidelines. P1 Temperature of sample storage refrigerator was out of acceptance limits. P2 The sample was preserved within 24 hours of collection in accordance with EPA 218.6. P3 Per Client request, sample was composited for volatile analysis. Sample compositing for volatile analysis is not recommended due to potential loss of target analytes. Results may be biased low. Q1 Analyte Calibration Verification exceeds criteria. The result is estimated. Q2 Analyte calibration was not verified and the result was estimated. Q3 Analyte initial calibration was not available or exceeds criteria. The result was estimated. S The surrogate recovery was out of control limits due to matrix interference. The associated method blank surrogate recovery was within control limits and the sample data was reported without further clarification. S1 The associated surrogate recovery was out of control limits; result is estimated. S2 The surrogate was diluted out due to the presence of high concentrations of target and/or non-target compounds. Surrogate recoveries in the associated batch QC met recovery criteria. S3 Internal Standard did not meet recovery limits. Analyte concentration is estimated. T Sample was extracted/analyzed past the holding time. T1 Reanalysis was reported past hold time due to failing replicates in the original analysis (BOD only). T2 Sample was analyzed ASAP but received and analyzed past the 15 minute holding time. T3 Sample received and analyzed out of hold time per client’s request. T4 Sample was analyzed out of hold time per client’s request. T5 Reanalysis was reported past hold time. The original analysis was within hold time, but not reportable. T6 Hold time is indeterminable due to unspecified sampling time. T7 Sample was analyzed past hold time due to insufficient time remaining at time of receipt. Definitions DF Dilution Factor MDL Method Detection Limit. Result is reported ND when it is less than or equal to MDL. ND Analyte was not detected or was less than the detection limit. NR Not Reported. See Report Comments. RDL Reporting Detection Limit TIC Tentatively Identified Compounds Lab Request 407664, Page 6 of 690618-PRELIMINARY REPORT Enthalpy Analytical, LLC PRELIMINARY RESULTS 11 of 18 12 of 18 13 of 18 14 of 18 15 of 18 16 of 18 Enthalpy Analytical - Berkeley Analytical Report Lab #: 304063 Location: DeAnza Properties Client: Almar Environmental Prep: METHOD Project#: 983-01 Analysis: ASTM D1946-90 Analyte: Helium Batch#: 264433 Matrix: Air Sampled: 10/10/18 Units: ppmv Received: 10/10/18 Units (Mol %): MOL % Analyzed: 10/11/18 Field ID Type Lab ID Result RL Result (Mol %) RL Diln Fac B7-11.5 SAMPLE 304063-001 ND 2,000 ND 0.20 2.010 B7-8.0 SAMPLE 304063-002 ND 2,000 ND 0.20 1.960 BLANK QC951355 ND 1,000 ND 0.10 1.000 ND= Not Detected RL= Reporting Limit Result Mol %= Result in Mole Percent Page 1 of 1 2.0 Batch QC Report Enthalpy Analytical - Berkeley Analytical Report Lab #: 304063 Location: DeAnza Properties Client: Almar Environmental Prep: METHOD Project#: 983-01 Analysis: ASTM D1946-90 Analyte: Helium Units (Mol %): MOL % Field ID: ZZZZZZZZZZ Batch#: 264433 MSS Lab ID: 304034-001 Sampled: 10/05/18 Matrix: Air Received: 10/09/18 Units: ppmv Analyzed: 10/11/18 Type Lab ID MSS Result Spiked Result RL Result (Mol %) RL %REC Limits RPD Lim Diln Fac BS QC951352 100,000 83,280 83 70-130 1.000 BSD QC951353 100,000 83,340 83 70-130 0 20 1.000 SDUP QC951356 <1,810 ND 1,810 ND 0.1810 NC 30 1.810 NC= Not Calculated ND= Not Detected RL= Reporting Limit RPD= Relative Percent Difference Result Mol %= Result in Mole Percent Page 1 of 1 3.1 Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to your company. Please feel free to call if there are any questions regarding this report or if we can be of further service. NOTE: Unless notified in writing, all samples will be discarded by appropriate disposal protocol 60 days from date received. The reports of the Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. are confidential property of our clients and may not be reproduced or used for publication in part or in full without our written permission. This is for the mutual protection of the public, our clients, and ourselves. Preliminary report generated by: Lisa Nguyen, PM Lab Request 407664, Page 1 of 790671-PRELIMINARY REPORT Client:Enthalpy - Berkeley Will Rice Address:2323 Fifth Street Berkeley, CA 94710 Lab Request: 407664 Report Date: 10/26/2018 Date Received: 10/19/2018 This laboratory request covers the following listed samples which were analyzed for the parameters indicated on the attached Analytical Result Report. All analyses were conducted using the appropriate methods. Methods accredited by NELAC are indicated on the report. This cover letter is an integral part of the final report. Project Number: 304063 Site: DeAnza Properties Comments: Attn: Client ID: 15279 Enthalpy Analytical, LLC 931 W. Barkley Ave - Orange, CA 92868 www.enthalpy.com info-sc@enthalpy.com Tel: (714)771-6900 Fax: (714)538-1209 NELAP:04232CA | ELAP:1338 Please use the data with caution as the results are preliminary and they have not undergone complete QC validation and/or second party review. The data is subject to change upon final review. PRELIMINARY Sample # Client Sample ID 407664-001 B7-11.5 Analyte Prepared AnalyzedDFRDLUnitsResultMDL Notes Sample #:407664-001 Sampled:10/10/2018 12:00 Site: B7-11.5Client Sample #: Matrix:Air Collector:ClientClient:Enthalpy - Berkeley Sample Type: By Method: EPA TO-15 Prep Method: Method QCBatchID: QC1196992 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 4.5 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ 1,1-Dichloroethane ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ 1,1-Dichloroethene ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.5 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2J JZZ 1,2-Dibromoethane ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ 1,2-Dichloroethane ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ 1,2-Dichloropropane ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.3 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2J JZZ 1,3-Butadiene ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ 2-Butanone (MEK)ND 1 10/26/18 08:075 Vppb2.5 ZZ 2-Hexanone ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ 4-Ethyltoluene 0.5 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2J JZZ 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Acetone 8.8 1 10/26/18 08:075 Vppb2.5 ZZ Benzene 8.5 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Benzyl Chloride ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Bromodichloromethane ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Bromoform ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Bromomethane ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Carbon disulfide 0.9 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2J JZZ Carbon Tetrachloride ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Chlorobenzene ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Chloroethane ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Chloroform 1.3 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Chloromethane ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ cis-1,3-dichloropropene ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.3 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2J JZZ Ethylbenzene 1.0 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Hexachlorobutadiene ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Isopropyl alcohol (IPA)ND 1 10/26/18 08:075 Vppb2.5 ZZ m and p-Xylene 3.6 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Methylene chloride ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Methyl-t-butyl Ether (MTBE)ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ o-Xylene 1.4 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Styrene ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Tetrachloroethene 3.0 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Toluene 9.3 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ trans-1,2-dichloroethene ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ trans-1,3-dichloropropene ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Trichloroethene 2.1 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Trichlorofluoromethane ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Vinyl acetate ND 1 10/26/18 08:075 Vppb2.5 ZZ Vinyl Chloride ND 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Xylenes (Total)4.9 1 10/26/18 08:071 Vppb0.2 ZZ Lab Request 407664, Page 2 of 790671-PRELIMINARY REPORT Enthalpy Analytical, LLC PRELIMINARY RESULTS Analyte Prepared AnalyzedDFRDLUnitsResultMDL Notes Sample #:407664-001 Sampled:10/10/2018 12:00 Site: B7-11.5Client Sample #: Matrix:Air Collector:ClientClient:Enthalpy - Berkeley Sample Type: By Surrogate % Recovery Limits Notes 4-Bromofluorobenzene (SUR)107 60-140 4-Bromofluorobenzene (SUR)60-140 Lab Request 407664, Page 3 of 790671-PRELIMINARY REPORT Enthalpy Analytical, LLC PRELIMINARY RESULTS QCBatchID: QC1196992 Matrix:Air Analyst:nicollez Instrument:VOA-MS (group)Analyzed:10/25/2018 Method:EPA TO-15 Blank Summary Analyte Result Units NotesRDL Blank MDL QC1196992MB1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND Vppb 10.2 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND Vppb 10.2 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND Vppb 10.2 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND Vppb 10.2 1,1-Dichloroethane ND Vppb 10.2 1,1-Dichloroethene ND Vppb 10.2 1,1-Difluoroethane ND Vppb 11 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND Vppb 10.2 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND Vppb 10.2 1,2-Dibromoethane ND Vppb 10.2 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane ND Vppb 10.2 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND Vppb 10.2 1,2-Dichloroethane ND Vppb 10.2 1,2-Dichloropropane ND Vppb 10.2 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND Vppb 10.2 1,3-Butadiene ND Vppb 10.2 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND Vppb 10.2 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND Vppb 10.2 2-Butanone (MEK)ND Vppb 52.5 2-Hexanone ND Vppb 10.2 4-Ethyltoluene ND Vppb 10.2 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ND Vppb 10.2 Acetone ND Vppb 52.5 Benzene ND Vppb 10.2 Benzyl Chloride ND Vppb 10.2 Bromodichloromethane ND Vppb 10.2 Bromoform ND Vppb 10.2 Bromomethane ND Vppb 10.2 Carbon disulfide ND Vppb 10.2 Carbon Tetrachloride ND Vppb 10.2 Chlorobenzene ND Vppb 10.2 Chloroethane ND Vppb 10.2 Chloroform ND Vppb 10.2 Chloromethane ND Vppb 10.2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND Vppb 10.2 cis-1,3-dichloropropene ND Vppb 10.2 Dichlorobenzenes (Total)ND Vppb 10.2 Dichlorodifluoromethane ND Vppb 10.2 Ethylbenzene ND Vppb 10.2 Heptane ND Vppb 10.2 Hexachlorobutadiene ND Vppb 10.2 Hexane ND Vppb 10.2 Isobutane ND Vppb Isopropyl alcohol (IPA)ND Vppb 52.5 m and p-Xylene ND Vppb 10.2 Methylene chloride ND Vppb 10.2 Methyl-t-butyl Ether (MTBE)ND Vppb 10.2 Naphthalene ND Vppb 55 o-Xylene ND Vppb 10.2 Styrene ND Vppb 10.2 Tetrachloroethene ND Vppb 10.2 Toluene ND Vppb 10.2 Lab Request 407664, Page 4 of 790671-PRELIMINARY REPORT Enthalpy Analytical, LLC PRELIMINARY RESULTS QCBatchID: QC1196992 Matrix:Air Analyst:nicollez Instrument:VOA-MS (group)Analyzed:10/25/2018 Method:EPA TO-15 . Analyte Result Units NotesRDL Blank MDL QC1196992MB1 trans-1,2-dichloroethene ND Vppb 10.2 trans-1,3-dichloropropene ND Vppb 10.2 Trichloroethene ND Vppb 10.2 Trichlorofluoromethane ND Vppb 10.2 Vinyl acetate ND Vppb 52.5 Vinyl Chloride ND Vppb 10.2 Xylenes (Total)ND Vppb 10.2 Duplicate Summary Analyte Amount Units RPD RPD LimitsSample Amount Duplicate Notes QC1196992DUP1 Source: 407664-001 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 4.5 4.5 Vppb 0.0 30 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 1,1-Dichloroethane ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 1,1-Dichloroethene ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.5 0.5 Vppb 0.0 30 1,2-Dibromoethane ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 1,2-Dichloroethane ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.3 0.3 Vppb 0.0 30 1,3-Butadiene ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 2-Butanone (MEK)ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 2-Hexanone ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 4-Ethyltoluene 0.5 0.5 Vppb 0.0 30 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 Acetone 8.8 8.8 Vppb 0.0 30 Benzene 8.5 8.0 Vppb 6.1 30 Benzyl Chloride ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 Bromodichloromethane ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 Bromoform ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 Bromomethane ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 Carbon disulfide 0.9 0.9 Vppb 0.0 30 Carbon Tetrachloride ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 Chlorobenzene ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 Chloroethane ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 Chloroform 1.3 1.2 Vppb 8.0 30 Chloromethane ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 cis-1,3-dichloropropene ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.3 0.4 Vppb 28.6 30 Ethylbenzene 1.0 1.0 Vppb 0.0 30 Hexachlorobutadiene ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 Isopropyl alcohol (IPA)ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 m and p-Xylene 3.6 3.4 Vppb 5.7 30 Methylene chloride ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 Lab Request 407664, Page 5 of 790671-PRELIMINARY REPORT Enthalpy Analytical, LLC PRELIMINARY RESULTS QCBatchID: QC1196992 Matrix:Air Analyst:nicollez Instrument:VOA-MS (group)Analyzed:10/25/2018 Method:EPA TO-15 Analyte Amount Units RPD RPD LimitsSample Amount Duplicate Notes QC1196992DUP1 Source: 407664-001 Methyl-t-butyl Ether (MTBE)ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 o-Xylene 1.4 1.4 Vppb 0.0 30 Styrene ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 Tetrachloroethene 3.0 2.9 Vppb 3.4 30 Toluene 9.3 8.8 Vppb 5.5 30 trans-1,2-dichloroethene ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 trans-1,3-dichloropropene ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 Trichloroethene 2.1 2.1 Vppb 0.0 30 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.2 0.2 Vppb 0.0 30 Vinyl acetate ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 Vinyl Chloride ND ND Vppb 0.0 30 Xylenes (Total)4.9 4.7 Vppb 4.2 30 Lab Request 407664, Page 6 of 790671-PRELIMINARY REPORT Enthalpy Analytical, LLC PRELIMINARY RESULTS Data Qualifiers and Definitions Qualifiers A See Report Comments. B Analyte was present in an associated method blank. B1 Analyte was present in a sample and associated method blank greater than MDL but less than RDL. BQ1 No valid test replicates. Sample Toxicity is possible. Best result was reported. BQ2 No valid test replicates. BQ3 No valid test replicates. Final DO is less than 1.0 mg/L. Result may be greater. BQ4 Minor Dissolved Oxygen loss was observed in the blank water check, however, the LCS was within criteria, validating the batch. BQ5 Minor Dissolved Oxygen loss was observed in the blank water check. C Possible laboratory contamination. D RPD was not within control limits. The sample data was reported without further clarification. D1 Lesser amount of sample was used due to insufficient amount of sample supplied. D2 Reporting limit is elevated due to sample matrix. Target analyte was not detected above the elevated reporting limit. D3 Insufficient sample was supplied for TCLP. Client was notified. TCLP was performed per the Client’s instructions. DW Sample result is calculated on a dry weigh basis. E Concentration is estimated because it exceeds the quantification limits of the method. I The sample was read outside of the method required incubation period. IR Inconclusive Result. Legionella is present, however, there is possible non-specific agglutination preventing specific identification. J Reported value is estimated L The laboratory control sample (LCS) or laboratory control sample duplicate (LCSD) was out of control limits. Associated sample data was reported with qualifier. L2 LCS did not meet recovery criteria, however, the MS and/or MSD met LCS recovery criteria, validating the batch. M The matrix spike (MS) or matrix spike duplicate (MSD) was not within control limits due to matrix interference. The associated LCS and/or LCSD was within control limits and the sample data was reported without further clarification. M1 The matrix spike (MS) or matrix spike duplicate (MSD) is not within control limits due to matrix interference. M2 The matrix spike (MS) or matrix spike duplicate (MSD) was not within control limits. The associated LCS and/or LCSD was not within control limits. Sample result is estimated. N1 Sample chromatography does not match the specified TPH standard pattern. NC The analyte concentration in the sample exceeded the spike level by a factor of four or greater, spike recovery and limits do not apply. P Sample was received without proper preservation according to EPA guidelines. P1 Temperature of sample storage refrigerator was out of acceptance limits. P2 The sample was preserved within 24 hours of collection in accordance with EPA 218.6. P3 Per Client request, sample was composited for volatile analysis. Sample compositing for volatile analysis is not recommended due to potential loss of target analytes. Results may be biased low. Q1 Analyte Calibration Verification exceeds criteria. The result is estimated. Q2 Analyte calibration was not verified and the result was estimated. Q3 Analyte initial calibration was not available or exceeds criteria. The result was estimated. S The surrogate recovery was out of control limits due to matrix interference. The associated method blank surrogate recovery was within control limits and the sample data was reported without further clarification. S1 The associated surrogate recovery was out of control limits; result is estimated. S2 The surrogate was diluted out due to the presence of high concentrations of target and/or non-target compounds. Surrogate recoveries in the associated batch QC met recovery criteria. S3 Internal Standard did not meet recovery limits. Analyte concentration is estimated. T Sample was extracted/analyzed past the holding time. T1 Reanalysis was reported past hold time due to failing replicates in the original analysis (BOD only). T2 Sample was analyzed ASAP but received and analyzed past the 15 minute holding time. T3 Sample received and analyzed out of hold time per client’s request. T4 Sample was analyzed out of hold time per client’s request. T5 Reanalysis was reported past hold time. The original analysis was within hold time, but not reportable. T6 Hold time is indeterminable due to unspecified sampling time. T7 Sample was analyzed past hold time due to insufficient time remaining at time of receipt. Definitions DF Dilution Factor MDL Method Detection Limit. Result is reported ND when it is less than or equal to MDL. ND Analyte was not detected or was less than the detection limit. NR Not Reported. See Report Comments. RDL Reporting Detection Limit TIC Tentatively Identified Compounds Lab Request 407664, Page 7 of 790671-PRELIMINARY REPORT Enthalpy Analytical, LLC PRELIMINARY RESULTS APPENDIX “D” LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared by Applied Remedial Technologies, Inc. (ARTI) for the exclusive use of De Anza Properties and its affiliates (Client) as it pertains to the project site located at 10931 N De Anza Blvd in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, California. ARTI professional services have been performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by other engineers, geologists, and/or scientists practicing in this field. No other warranty, express or implied, is made as to the professional advice in this report. ARTI offers no assurances and assumes no responsibility for site conditions or activities that were outside the Proposed Scope of Work (SOW) outlined in the attached report. In the preparation of this report, ARTI has relied on the accuracy of documents, oral information, and materials provided by others. No warranty is expressed or implied with the usage such information or material. This report may contain recommendationsandconclusions,whicharegenerallybasedonincompleteand/orinsufficientinformation of the site conditions present. However, further engineering and hydrogeological investigation may reveal additional information, which may require the enclosed recommendations and conclusions to be reevaluated. Prior to use of this report by any party other than the Client, the party should notify ARTI of such intended use. The attached report my not contain sufficient information for purposes of other parties or other uses. Any use or reliance on this report by a third party shall be at such party’s sole risk. The findings set forth in the attached report are strictly limited in time and scope to the date of the services described herein, and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the services agreed upon, or the time and budgeting constraints imposed by the Client. Any conditions and factors, including land use and contaminant plume migration, may change over passage of time, additional investigation may be required to update the site conditions (on-site and off-site), which may require the findings in the report to be reevaluated.