Reso 6731 CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION N0.6731
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLIT'ION OF
APPROXIMATELY 2.66 MILLION SQUARE FEET OF EXISTING OFFICE, RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT BUILDINGS AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF 3.42 MILLION SQUARE FEET OF
OFFICE, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BUILDINGS; 120,000 SQ.FT. (1,000 SEAT) CORPORATE
AUDITORIUM, 100,000 SQ.FT. CORPORATE FITNESS CENTER, AND 25,000 SQ.FT. VALET PARKING
RECEPTION USES;92,000 SQUARE FEET OF UTILITY PLANTS;AND ASSOCIATED PARKING
FACILITIES AND ANCILLARY BUILDINGS(SUCH AS SECURITY RECEPTION AREAS AND
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE BUILDINGS);USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A CORPORATE
AUDITORIUM AND FITNESS CENTER AT A NEW OFFICE, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
CAMPUS;ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW A NEW 2.82 MILLION SQUARE
FEET OFFICE, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT BUILDING WITH 2,385 BASEMENT PARKING
SPACES AND A CAFETERIA, A 5,870 PARKING SPACE STRUCTURED PARKING FACILITY WITH
ATTACHED CENTRAL PLANT, A 1,000 SEAT CORPORATE AUDITORIUM, A FITNESS CENTER,
AND ASSOCIATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING ACCESS TUNNELS, A SURFACE PARKING
LOT, OUTDOOR DINING AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AND LANDSCAPING;TREE
REMOVAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE REMOVAL OF APPROXIMATELY 4,501 TREES, OF WHICH,
APPROXIMATELY 90 TREES ARE PROPOSED TO BE TRANSPLANTED, AND REPLACEMENT WITH
AT LEAST 6,200 TREES TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN OFFICE, RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT CAMPUS FOR A PROJECT LOCATED AT THE AREA BOUNDED BY EAST
HOMESTEAD ROAD, NORTH TANTAU AVENUE, I-280, NORTH WOLFE ROAD INCLUDING
PROPERTIES LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH TANTAU AVENUE
Application No(s).: ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04, TR-2011-39, U-2011-11 (EA-2011-12)
Applicant: Apple Inc. (Dan Whisenhunt)
Location: Area bounded by East Homestead Road, North Tantau Avenue, I-280, North
Wolfe Road including properties located on the east side of North Tantau Avenue
(APN Nos. 316 06 033;316 06 038; 316 06 039;316 06 045;316 06 046; 316 06 048;316
06 049; 316 06 050; 316 06 051; 316 06 052; 316 06 053; 316 07 044; 316 07 045; 316 07
046; 316 09 019; 316 09 027; 316 09 028; 316 18 012; 316 18 025; 316 18 026; 316 18
027;31618 035)
Subject: Approval of a 3,789,000 sq.ft. office, research and development campus
WHEREAS, an application was received by the City (Application no. DP-2011-04) for a Development
Permit to allow the demolition of approximately 2.66 million square feet of existing office, research and
development buildings and the construction of 3.42 million square feet of office, research, and
development buildings; 120,000 sq.ft. (1,000 seat) corporate auditorium, 100,000 sq.ft. corporate fitness
center, and 25,000 sq.ft. valet parking reception uses; 92,000 square feet of utility plants; and associated
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 2
parking facilities and ancillary buildings (such as security reception areas and landscape maintenance
buildings);and
WHEREAS, an application was received by the City (Application no. U-2011-11) for a Conditional Use
Permit to allow a corporate auditorium and fitness center at a new office, research and development
campus; and
WHEREAS, an application was received by the City (Application ASA-2011-14) for Architectural and
Site Approval to allow a new 2.82 million square feet office, research and development building with
2,385 basement parking spaces and a cafeteria, a 5,870 parking space structured parking facility with
attached central plant, a 1,000 seat corporate auditorium, a fitness center, and associated site
improvements including access tuiulels, a surface parking lot, outdoor dining and recreational facilities
and landscaping;
WHEREAS, an application was received by the City (Application no. TR-2011-39) for a Tree Removal
Permit to allow the removal of approximately 4,501 trees, of which, approximately 90 trees are proposed
to be transplanted, and replacement with at least 6,200 trees
WHEREAS, the Development Permit is required for the Apple Campus 2 Project, which consists of
demolition of all existing structures within the project site and the construction of 3,420,00 square feet of
office, research, and development uses; 245,000 square feet of auditorium, fitness center, and Valet
Parking Reception uses; 92,000 square feet of utility plants; and parking and ancillary buildings (such as
security reception areas and landscape maintenance buildings), of which the proposed buildings are
designed to be energy efficient and to use renewable energy (including energy produced on site via
photovoltaic infrastructure and fuel cells), all as fully described and analyzed in the June 2013 Apple
Campus 2 Project Environmental Impact Repart ("Draft EIR") (State Clearinghouse No. 2011082055), as
amended by text revisions in Chapter IV of the September 2013 Apple Campus 2 Project EIR Response to
Comments Document("Response to Comments Document") (collectively, the "Final EIR"); and
WHEREAS, the Conditional Use Permit is required to allow a corporate auditorium and fitness center at
a new office, research and development campus, also fully described and analyzed in the Final EIR; and
WHEREAS, the Architectural and Site Approval is required for a new 2.82 million square feet office,
research and development building with approximately 2,385 basement parking spaces and a cafeteria,
an approximately 5,870 parking space struciured parking facility with attached central plant, a 1,000 seat
corporate auditorium, a fitness center, and associated site improvements including access tunnels, a
surface parking lot, outdoor dining and recreational facilities and landscaping, also fully described and
analyzed in the Final EIR; and
WHEREAS, the Tree Removal Permit is required to allow the removal of approximately 4,501 trees, of
which, approximately 90 trees are proposed to be transplanted, and replacement with at least 6,200 trees
to allow the construction of an office, research and development campus for the Apple Campus 2 Project
also fully described and analyzed in the Final EIR; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the procedural ordinances of
the City of Cupertino and the Government Code, the Final EIR was presented to the Planning
Commission on October 1, 2013 at a Joint Planning Commission and City Council Study Session; and
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 3
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the procedural ordinances of
the City of Cupertino and the Government Code, and the Planning Commission held a public hearing on
. October 2, 2013 in regard to the applications; and
WHEREAS, based on substantial evidence in the administrative record, the Planning Commission has
recommended that the City Council certify that the Final EIR has been completed in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and reflects the
independent judgment and analysis of the City, adopt the Findings and Statement of Overriding
Considerations for the Project, and make conditions of approval all of the mitigation measures for the
Project that are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of the City that are identified in Findings; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended that the City Council approve the General Plan
Amendment and the Rezoning applications; and
NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED:
After careful consideration of the, maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this
matter, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Application Nos.
ASA-2011-14, DP-2011-04, TR-2011-39, U-2011-11, (EA-2011-12) based upon the findings described in
Section II of this resolution, the public hearing record and the Minutes of Planning Coinmission Meeting
of October 2, 2013, and subject to the conditions specified in Sections III and IV of this resolution.
SECTION II: FINDINGS
A. DEVELOPMENT PERMIT(APPLICATION NO. DP-2011-04):
1. The proposed development at the proposed location will not be detrimental or injurious to property
or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general
welfare or convenience;
Tlie Project is designed to minimize the impact upon the surrounding community and the environment. In
order to reduce its impact on the environment, the Project will utilize onsite photovoltaics and fuel cells and
obtain the remainder of its energy needs from the State of California Direct Access Program, off-site Apple-
owned renewable energy �rojects or grid-purclTased renewable energy. The Project lias been designed to
incorporate passive lieating and cooling in the main office building which will use ambient air. Tliis will reduce
tlie use of ineclianical cooling making for a more efficient and better work environment. Tlie project has been
designed to minimize its impact upon the neiglibors, adjacent roads and freeways and tlie environment.
Appropriate mitigation measures to address traffic impacts along with the adoption of an aggressive but
acliievable T�•ansportation Demand Management Plan will furtlier reduce tlle traffic impacts of the project.
Adequate buffer has been provided around tlie project to allow privacy and to reduce impacts to neighbors. T11e
site lias a Corporate Fitness Center wl2ich would enable employees to attend to their general health and
incorporates many jogging trails and an on-site bike sllaring prog��am. Tlie project also 1Tas a la��ge on-site
��estaurant witli several smaller indoor and outdoor dining facilities.
T)ze project inc�•eases tlie amount of landscaped green space to over 100 acres. The landscape design of
meadows, and woodlands will create an ecologically rich oak savanna reminiscent of tlie early Santa Clara
Valley. It will incorporate botli young and mature trees, and native and droi�ght tolerant plants, tjiat will
thrive in Santa Cla��a County with minimal water consumption. In addition, the project includes some ordiard
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 4
fruit trees, the fruit from whicli will be used at the on-site dining facilities furthering sustainability principles.
The project proposes to add at least 1,700 additional trees to the site and increase the pervious surface areas on
site significantly improving stormwater quality and reducing run-off: Site access has been designed to
consolidate entry and exit in order to reduce conflict with pedestrian and bicycle activity and is directed away
fi•om the residential neighborhood. Adequate emergency access has been provided on site. The design of tlie
Project and its environmental attributes are not detrimental to tlie health, safety, peace, morals and general
welfare of persons residing or wol�king in the neigliborhood of tlle subject parcels.
2. The proposed development will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino
Comprehensive General Plan, underlying zoning regulations, the purpose of this title and complies
with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA).
The majority of the site is designated Industrial/Residential in the General Plan Land Use Map, wlzicli allows,
among other uses, research and development and supporting uses. Tlie Zoning designation for most of tlie site
is Planned Development (Planned Industrial Park) (P(MP)), which similarly allows, among other uses,
researcli and development and supporting uses. The Planned Development district allows the City flexibility to
approve project specific development standards different from the standards outlined in the Zoning regulations
for tlie site. A small portion of the project site is currently designated for use as a public park in both tlze
General Plan and Zoning; liowever, the concurrent General Plan Amendment and Rezoning of a portion of tlie
site will ensure tliat the project is in compliance witli the General Plan and the Zoning regulations governing
the project site. The project furthers many General Plan policies, notably, General Plan Policy 2-44:
Maintaining Cohesive Commercial Centers and Office Parks which states that "Cohesive commercial centers
and office parks are necessary to maintain a healthy sales tax base for tlze city and to retain opportunities for
existing businesses to expand in response to changing business trends." The same General Plan policy goes on
to state " ..... tlze office parks are located at Vallco (North of Higlzway 280),....." The Pr•oject also promotes:
Policy 2-40(maintaining tlie vitality of business and manufacturing), Policy 2-20, Strategy 3 (diversity of land
use, major companies), and Policy 2-42 (revenue analysis of office developments). Finally, tlie project also
proposes to make improvements for tlie niternate Calabazas Creek trail furtliering Policy 2-73, Trails.
Tlierefore, the proposed development substantially conforms to tlie General Plan and is substantially consistent
with tlie underlying Zoning.
As described in tlie CEQA approvals, tlie Project has mitigated ntost impacts witlzin tlze Cit�of Cupertino to a
level of less than significant. Those impacts tliat cannot be mitigated to a level of less tllan significant will be
mitigated to the extent feasible. Additionnlly, where there are impacts at locations outside the jurisdiction of the
City of Cuyertino,feasible mitigation measures have been identified which wzll reduce impacts to less-than-
significant. However, since the approval of tlie mitigation measure is subject to the approval of an agency otlier
than the City of Cu�ertino, the City cannot guarantee the construction of t1Te mitigation measure. In tlTese
cases, tlie Final EIR requil�es tliat Apple diligently pursue approval of sucli mitigation measures and provide
funding, but due to the possibility that the measures might not be implemented, it finds that tlie im�acts are
significant and unavoidable. All feasible mitigation measures liave been adopted and made conditions of project
approval. As set out more full� in the Resolution of tlie Planning Commission of the City of Cupe�•tino
1•ecommending certification of An Environmental Impact Report for tlie Ap�le Campus 2 project; and
recommending Adoption of Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, Mitigation Measures, and
a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, tlie project complies with CEQA.
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 5
B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT(APPLICAT'ION NO. U-2011-11�:
1. 'The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general
welfare, or convenience;
Tlie Project proposes to add a 1,000 seat Corporate Auditorium and Corporate Fitness Center. The applicant
would use tl2e Corporate Auditorium for product launches and other events witli up to 350 invited guests. The
availability of a Corporate Auditorium as an in-house amenity to the employees in an office campus is fairly
common. For these reasons, the City finds that tlie Corporate Auditorium will not be detrimental or injurious
to property or improvements in tlle vicinity, and will not be detrimental to tlie public health, safety, general
welfare, or convenience.
Additionally, the provision of a Corporate Fitness Center is anotlier fairly common amenity for employees. Tl2e
availability of the Corporate Fitness Center on site would allow employees to stay on campus and visit a
physician reducing the number of trips to and from the campus, reducing vehicle miles travelled in genel�al and
reducing traffic in tlie general vicinity. Finally, tlie availability of a gym on campus will generally benefit
employee health and general welfare. For tlzese reasons, tlze City finds that the that the Fitness center will not
be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to tlie
public liealth, safety, general welfare, or convenience.
Both of tliese amenities have been designed to minimize impacts upon the public and will contribute to
enhanced general welfare and convenience by allowing the consolidation of ma�iy of Ap�le's employees in one
location.
2. The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino
Comprehensive General Plan, underlying zoning regulations, and the purpose of this title and
complies with the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA).
TITe majority of the site is designated Industrial/Residential in tlie General Plan Land Use Map, wl2ich allows,
among otlier uses, research and development and supporting uses. Tlie Zoning designation for most of t11e site
is Planned Develo�ment (Planned Industrial Park) (P(MP)), which similarly allows, among otller uses,
research and development and supporting uses. Tlie Planned Development district allows tlie City flexibility to
a�prove project specific development standards different from the standards outlined in tlie Zoning regulations
for tlie site. A small yortion of the project site is currently designated for use as a public park in both tlie
General Plan and Zoning; liowever, tlie concurrent General Plan Amendment and Rezoning of a portion of the
site will ensure tliat tlie project is in complinnce witli tlie General Plan and tJze Zoning regulations governing
tlle �roject site. Tlie provision of tlzese two in-lzouse amenities allows tlie development of a unified and
consolidated corporate office, researdz and development campus. Tlie project, as a wliole,furthers many General
Plan policies, notably, General Plan Policy 2-44: Maintaining Colzesive Commercial Centers and Office Parks
whidi states that "ColTesive commercial centers and office pa�•ks are necessary to maintain a healthy sales tax
base for tlie cit� and to retain opportunities for existing businesses to expand in response to changing business
trends." Tlie same Gene�•al Plan policy goes on to state " ..... the office parks a��e located at Vallco (North of
Higliwny 280),....." Tlie Project also promotes: Policy 2-40 (maintaining tlie vitality of business and
manufacturing), Policy 2-20, St��ategy 3 (diversit� of land use, major companies), and Polic� 2-42 (revenue
analysis of office developments).
In addition to researdz and development and supporting uses being allowed by t11e underlying zoning of tlze
properties, auxiliary or ancillary uses may be permitted for uses tlzat a�•e an essential part of tlie operations of
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 6
the use and for recreational uses. Since the Corporate Auditorium is intended for use for product launclies for
products developed at the campus, this is considered essential use, while the Corporate Fitness Center is
considered to be a recreational use. Tlierefore, both tlzese uses comply with zoning regulations.
Wliile tlie Final EIR identifies mitigation measures for the project as a whole, it does not identify specific
significant impacts resulting from the development of these two in-house amenities alone. As described in the
CEQA approvals, tlie Project lias mitigated most impacts within the City of Cupertino to a level of less tlian
significant. Those impacts that cannot be mitigated to a level of less than significant will be mitigated to the
extent feasible. Additionally, where tliere are impacts at locations outside the jurisdiction of tlie City of
Cupertino,feasible mitigation measures liave been identified whicli will reduce impacts to less-tl2an-significant.
However, since the approval of the mitigation measure is subject to tlie approval of an agency otlier than tlie
City of Cupertino, tlie City cannot guarantee the construction of the mitigation measure. In these cases, tlie
Final EIR requires tliat Apple diligently pursue approval of such mitigation measures and provide funding, but
due to the possibility that the measures might not be implemented, it finds that the impacts are significant and
unavoidable. All feasible mitigation measures have been adopted and made conditions of project approval. As
set out more fully in tlie Resolution of the Planning Commission of tlze City of Cupertino recommending
certification of An Environmental Impact Report for tlie Apple Campus 2 project; and recommending Adoption
of Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations,Mitigation Measures, and a Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program, tlie project complies with CEQA.
C. ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL(APPLICATION NO.ASA-2011-14�:
1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare
or convenience;
Tlze Project is designed to minimize tlie impact upon the surrounding community and the environment. In
order to reduce its impact on the environment, the Project will utilize onsite photovoltaics and fuel cells and
obtain the remainder of its energy needs from tlie State of California Direct Access Program, off-site Apple-
owned renewable energy projects or grid-purclzased renewable energ�. The Project lias been designed to
incorporate passive 1leating and cooling in tlie main office building which will use ambient air. Tliis will reduce
tlie use of inechanical cooling making for a more efficient and better work environment. The project has been
designed to minimize its impact upon the neighbors, adjacent roads and fi•eeways and tlie environment.
Appropriate mitigation measures to add�•ess traffic impacts along witli tlie adoption of an aggressive but
achievable Transportation Demand Management Plan will further reduce tlie traffic impacts of tlze project.
Adequate buffer has been provided around the project to allow privacy and to reduce impacts to neighbors. T{ie
site has a Corporate Fitness Center which would enable employees to attend to their general liealth and
incorporates many jogging trails and an on-site bike sharing program. Tlie project also has a large on-site
restaurant witli several smaller indoor and outdoor dining facilities.
Tlie p�roject inc��eases tlie amount of landscaped g�•een space to over 100 acres. Tlie landscape design of
meadows, and woodlands will create an ecologically ricli oak savanna reminiscent of the early Santa Cla��a
Valley. It will inco��orate both young and mature trees, and native and d�•ought tolerant plants, that will
tlirive in Santa Clara County witli minimal water consumption. In addition, the p��oject includes some o�•cha��d
fi�uit trees, tlie fi�uit from wllich will be used at tlze on-site dining facilities furthering sustainability principles.
Tlie p�roject p�ro�oses to add at least 1,700 additional tf•ees to the site and increase the pervious surface areas on
site significantly improving stormwater quality and reducing run-off. Site access lias been designed to
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 7
consolidate entry and exit in order to reduce conflict with pedestrian and bicycle activity and is directed away
from the residential neighborhood. Adequate emergency access has been provided on site. The design of the
Project and its environmental attributes are not detrimental to the liealth, safety, peace, morals and general
welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of tlie subject parcels.
2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of this chapter, the General Plan, any specific plan,
zoning ordinances, applicable planned development permit, conditional use permits, variances,
subdivision maps or other entitlements to use which regulate the subject property including, but not
limited to, adherence to the following specific criteria:
The concurrent General Plan Amendment, Rezoning of a portion of tlie site, Development Permit for the
project, Vesting Tentative Map, Development Agreement and Conditional Use permit for the Corporate
Auditorium and the Corporate Fitness Center will ensure tliat the �roject is iri compliance with tlie General
Plan and the Zoning regulations governing the project site. The project, as a whole,furthers many Gene1•al
Plan policies, notably, General Plan Policy 2-44: Maintaining Coliesive Commereial Centers and Office Parks
wliich states that "Cohesive commercial centers and office parks are necessari� to maintain a healtliy sales tax
base for the eity and to retain opportunities for existing businesses to expand in response to clianging business
trends." The same General Plan policy goes on to state " ..... the office parks are located at Vallco (Nortli of
Highway 280),....." The Project also promotes: Policy 2-40 (maintaining the vitality of business and
manufacturing), Policy 2-20, Strategy 3 (diversity of land use, major companies), and Policy 2-42 (revenue
analysis of office developments). Finally, the project also proposes to make improvements for tlie alternate
Calabazas Creek trail furthering Poliey 2-73, Trails. Therefore, tlie proposed development substantiall�
conforms to the General Plan and is substantially consistent with tlie underlying Zoning.
Tlie ardzitecture of the proposed projeet partieularl�furthers General Plan Policy 2-14: Att��aetive Building
and Site Design "by careful attention to building scale, mass and placement, architecture, materials,
landscaping, sereening of equipment and loading areas and related design eonsiderations."The project design
incorporates several of tlie strategies included in tliis General Plan Polic� including articulation and
segmentation of wall and roof planes, visual openings in tlie wall plane, appropriate setbacks and hierarchical
landscaping. In addition, the project incorporates the use of natural materials in tlze Fitness Center. Most of the
parking for tlie projeet is provided in structured parking that is loeated underground or on the portion of t)ze
site that is least visible from City streets.
a. Abrupt changes in building scale should be avoided. A gradual transition related to height and
bulk should be achieved between new and existing buildings.
T11e Project will involve the demolition of all tlle existing buildings on the site and tlie construction of new
buildings. Tl2e buildings approved witli this Arclzitectural and Site Approval all meet tlie 12eight
restrictions of tlie General Plan. Tlze prirnary structui�e is one height and is designed to not be visible fi�om
surrounding properties. Tlie entire site is being re-graded to ensua�e that tliere is a level pad for tlze first
floor of tlTe main building and the unde�•ground parking. Witli this ehange, tlie main building will be t12e
saine heiglit. Tlie main building, wliicli is tlie primary structure, will be minimally visible from
surrounding properties due to the proposed setbacks, berms and landscapirig around the perimeter of tlie
property. The Corporate Fitness Center will be minimally visible from tlie street due to the proposed
setbacks, berms and landscaping around tlie pe�•imeter of the site. A very small portion of tlie Corporate
Auditorium will be visible above grade. Most of the Corporate Auditorium will be located below the ��e-
graded site. Tlie Main Parking Structure will be located along I-280 and belTind a 8 to 12 foot sound wall
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 8
and screened by landscaping, making it minimally visible. In addition, tlie structures will be minimally
visible from surrounding properties due to the proposed setbacks, be1•ms and landscaping around tlle site.
b. In order to preserve design harmony between new and existing buildings and in order to
preserve and enhance property values, the materials, textures and colors of new buildings should
harmonize with adjacent development by being consistent or compatible with design and color
schemes, and with the future character of the neighborhood and purposes of the zone in which
they are situated. The location,height and materials of walls, fencing, hedges and screen planting
should harmonize with adjacent development. Unsightly storage areas, utility installations and
unsightly elements of parking lots should be concealed. The planting of ground cover or various
types of pavements should be used to prevent dust and erosion, and the unnecessary destruction
of existing healthy trees should be avoided. Lighting for development should be adequate to
meet safety requirements as specified by the engineering and building departments and provide
shielding to prevent spillover light to adjoining property owners.
The primary office building will be minimally visible from the adjacent development and thus will preserve
the design Jiarmony in the area. Tlie project proposes to demolish all existing buildings and structures on
tlie site and convert an outmoded business park into a world-class corporate campus witll a significant
increase in open space and pervious surface. The property values in the adjacent area will be maintained or
enhanced by the visible open space at tlze site. The walls,fencing, hedges and screen planting have been
designed to minimize the impacts upon adjacent properties and to be aesthetically pleasing. Storage areas
and service buildings will be sliielded from view or set sufficiently back from the p�•operty line to not be
visible. Permeable surface area lzas been increased greatly on the site in order to increase open space. Tlze
destruction of healthy trees Izas occurred, but will be replaced by more trees than are removed. TIZe lighting
for the development has been designed so as to not spill over onto adjacent properties. In addition to tlze
construction of large berms, mature trees are being retained along the perimeter of the site and several large
trees a1•e being planted and others being transplanted to tJze perimeter of the site to ensure tliat tliere is no
glare and light from the development.
c. The number, location, color, size, height, lighting and landscaping of outdoor advertising signs
and structures shall minimize traffic hazards and shall positively affect the general appearance of
the neighborhood and harmonize with adjacent development.
The Pi•oject approval does not p�ropose any signage and tlierefore this finding does not apply to tlTis pi�oject.
However, Apple will file separate signage permits in the future wl2ich will be reviewed, in order to
minimize impact upon traffic, tlze general appearance of the neighborliood and harmonize with adjacent
development.
d. With respect to new projects within existing residential neighborhoods, new development should
be designed to protect residents from noise, traffic, light and visually intrusive effects by use of
buffering, setbacks, landscaping, walls and other appropriate design measures.
Tlie Project is designed to minimize impacts upon adjacent neighborlioods by tlie use of berms, t��ee
planting and extensive setbacks to minimize tlie visibility of tlie main building and to ensure tliat light and
gla�•e do not spill onto adjacent development. Tlie parking structures are located at tlie soutliern edge of tlie
property and will be minimally visible only fi�om tlie freeway. Large landscaped buffers are being p��oposed
along the sliared property lines wliile tlie buildings are setback significantly fi�om residential developments.
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 9
In addition, automobile entrances are consolidated into two locations which will direct traffic away from
the residences. As described in the EIR, operational noise levels will be minimal due to both the setbacks
and the nature of the operations and construction noise will be mitigated through the construction of a
temporary soundwall during construction.
D. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT(APPLICATION NO.TR-2011-39�:
1. The location of the trees restricts the economic enjoyment of the property by severely limiting the use
of property in a manner not typically experienced by owners of similarly zoned and situated
property, and the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the approval authority that there
are no reasonable alternatives to preserve the tree(s).
The applicant is proposing the removal of approximately 4,501 trees, including the relocation of 90 trees witliin
the proposed project. The trees are part of approved landscape design for existing buildings and parking lots.
Since the buildings and parking lots will be demolislzed with this project, the trees would be located in buildable
areas. Retention of these landscape trees in their current location would significantly restrict t12e ability to
redevelop the property in a manner that differs from tlie existing configuration of buildings and parking lots.
Tlie removal of these trees is necessary to allow for the development of a project that makes use of tlie existing
site more efficiently. Further, the Project will result in a significant increase in the number of trees, including
more native and drought tolerant trees. As a part of the project, the project proposes to save and keep
approximately 845 trees in place and transplant approximately 90 trees. The trees removed will be replaced in
accordance with the City's Protected Tree Ordinance.
Trees planted on site will be considered "protected"per the City's definition of Protected Trees. 'I1ie consulting
arborist ]ias confirmed that the tree replacement plan proposed by tlie applicant is consistent with the Cit�'s
Protected Tree Ordinance requirements. Details of the tree replacements are provided on Page 7.15 of tlie pinn
set. At least 6,200 trees (an increase of 1,700 trees over existing) will be planted as replacement for tlie tr�ees
being removed in box sizes varying from 24" box (1-3" diameter) to 132" box (8+" diameter), and would
include some 15 gallon trees.
Trees relocated include a Memorial tree dedicated to a former HP employee, a 33 inch Oak tree and several
large redwood trees tliat are planted in a grove around tlie current Glendenning Barn location.
Several street trees will also need to be removed witli the implementation of the various street improvements
proposed and required as mitigations for the project. Tlie number of street trees to be 1�emoved sliall be reviewed
witli tlie approval of street improvement permits and reviewed by tlie City's A�•borist. T{ie replacement of tlie
street trees sliall be in accordance with the requiremerits of Chapter 14.12, Trees, of the Municipal Code.
Tlze tree removals are requi��ed in order to accommodate the development and to create open space and
additional pe�•meable sui face across tlze entire development.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADMINISTERED BY THE DEPARTMENTS OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
The recommendation of approval is based on the plan set dated received September 16, 2013
consisting of 159 pages labeled P-1.00—P1.01, P-1.10 - P1.13, P1.19—P-1.28, P-1.30—P-1.31, P-1.40—
P-1.41, P-2.00—P-2.01, P-3.10—P-3.16, P-4.00—P-4.01, P4.10, P-4.20—P-4.25, P-4.30—P-4.32, P-5.00—
P-5.04, P-6.00—P-6.01, P-6.10-P-6.11,P-7.00—P-7.03, P-7.10—P-7.16, P-8.01 —P-8.06, P-8.09—P-8.10,
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 10
P-9.00 -P9.01, P-9.03-P-9.04, P-10.00-P-10.03, P-11.1 -P-11.04, P-12.00-P-12.04, P-13.00, P-14.00
- P-14.01, P-17.00 - P-17.02, P-18.00, P-19.00 - P-19.03, P-19.00 - P-19.11, P-20.00 - P-20.01, P-21.00,
P-22.00, P-22.03, P-22.04, P-22.10, P23.00, P-23.50, P-23.52, P-24.00, P-24.00-a, P-24.02, P-24.02, P-
24.05, P-24.06, P-25.02, P-26.00, P-26.01, P-28.00, P30.00, P-30.01, P-35.00, P-35.01 -P-35.08, P-40.01 -
P-40.06 and P-41.00 - P-41.08, titled "Apple Campus 2, Planned Development Permit, September
2013" prepared by Foster + Partners, ARUP, OLIN, Kier & Wright, ALTA and Watry Design, Inc.;
except as may be amended with redlines on the pages by the Conditions contained in this
Resolution.
2. ACCURACY OF THE PROjECT PLANS
The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not
limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage,
any relevant easements and/or construction records.
Minor errors may be corrected if in compliance with the assumptions and supporting data for this
approval, subject to the review and approval of the Director of Community Development.
However, misrepresentation of property data that is considered major by the Director of
Community Development may require additional review by the Planning Commission and/or City
Council. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the
Community Development Department.
3. MITIGATION MEASURES AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING
PROGRAM
All of the Mitigation Measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report (State
Clearinghouse # 2011082055) for the ("Apple Campus 2 Project EIR") certified by the Council on
October 15, 2013 are hereby incorporated by reference and included as conditions of approval of
this project. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRI'), attached as Exhibit DP-1,
is hereby incorporated and all applicant/property owner obligations described in the MMRI' are
included as conditions of this permit to ensure that the mitigation measures identified in the Apple
Campus 2 Project EIR are complied with during project implementation and operation.
4. AB 900 CONDITIONS
The project is subject to conditions pursuant to the Jobs and Economic Improvement Through
Environmental Leadership Act of 2011 (AB 900). These AB 900 Compliance conditions are attached
hereto as E�chibit DP-2 and are incorporated by reference herein.
5. CONCURRENT APPROVAL
The following permits have been approved concurrently with this application: ASA-2011-14, DA-
2011-01, GPA-2011-03, TM-2011-03, TR-2011-39,U-2011-11, Z-2011-03 (EA-2011-12).
6. DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
The applicant shall receive a development allocation of 87,746 square feet from the Vallco Park
North Special Center and 109,935 square feet from the Major Employers allocation (companies with
Cupertino sales offices and corporate headquarters) for a total of 197,681 square feet to construct
the structures indicated in the table below.
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 11
Gross Net Office Allocation
Amenity Space Area (as
Building =Gross Building
Structure defined in Development
Area Agreement) (sq. ft.) Area—Amenity Space
(sq.ft.) Area(s . ft.)
Entries 112,000
Area of
Main Building 2,820,000 walkway in 234,000 2,384,000
excess of 7.5 feet
Restaurant 90,000
Outdoor Food Stations 10,000 10,000 0
Transit Center 5,000 4,500 500
Corporate Fitness Center 100,000 89,000 11,000
Corporate Auditorium 120,000 120,000 0
Valet Parking Reception 25,000 20,000 5,000
Maintenance Buildings 10,000 10,000 0
Security Receptions 7,000 7,000 0
Central Plant 50,000 50,000 0
Testing labs/
Phase 2—Office,
Research and 600,000 anechoic 100,000 480,000
Development chambers
Restaurant 20,000
Phase 2—Satellite Plants 42,000 North Plant 12,000 p
South Plant 30,000
TOTAL 3,789,000 908,500 2,880,500
Conversion of Amenity Space to office space shall require an application for development
allocation.
The effective date of the Development Permit is the effective date of the Development Agreement.
7. PHASING
The project is approved to be developed in multiple phases. Construction phasing shall be as
follows:
a. Phase 1: The first phase of construction shall include the construction of the main building,
the corporate fitness center, the corporate auditorium, the main parking garage with attached
central plant, the North Tantau parking garage including valet parking reception,
maintenance facilities, outdoor dining stands, security reception areas and all public
improvements identified, required and proposed within the City's right of way.
b. Phase 2 : The subsequent phases of construction(Phase 2) shall include the construction of the
remaining buildings on the east side of N. Tantau Avenue south of Pruneridge Avenue and
the buildings proposed on the west side of N. Tantau Avenue between the Calabazas Creek
and I-280. However, if the buildings are built at different times, adequate parking has to be
provided for each building,upon completion of construction and as approved.
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 12
8. SUBSE UENT APPROVALS
Any structures/project elements that were not specifically designed/approved with this project,
shall be subject to a separate application and process as outlined in the Development Agreement.
Examples include additional buildings, maintenance facilities, accessory structures and wireless
facilities.
9. ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL
Architectural and Site Approval is granted for the main building, the main parking structure, the
auditorium, and the fitness center and the associated site improvements.
Building permits for the North Tantau parking garage, including the valet reception building,
outdoor dining stands, the security receptions and the maintenance facilities and the Phase 2
portion of development shall be issued upon the approval of separate Architectural and Site
Approval applications subject to the Development Agreement.
10. PHASE 2 BUILDING ENVELOPE
The Building Envelope approved for Phase 2 parcels are as follows:
Front Setback (min.) ■ 15'
■ 1:1 slope line on N. Tantau Avenue (as amended by
GPA-2011-03)
Street Side Setback (min.) ■ 15'
Interior Side Setback(min.) ■ 25'
■ Adjacent to residential zones—100'
■ For parcels north of Calabazas creek and side yard
adjacent to residential parcels—buildings taller than 16'
shall have a setback of 150'
Setback from Creek ■ Subject to requirements of the Streamside Modification
Permit under Municipal Code Chapter 19.19, Water
Resources Protection
Rear setback (min.) ■ 25'
■ Adjacent to residential zones— 100'
■ For parcels north of Calabazas creek and adjacent to
residential parcels—buildings taller than 16' shall have
a setback of 150'
Building Height (max.) ■ 60'
■ 1:1 slope line on N. Tantau Avenue (as amended by
GPA-2011-03)
11. BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL
The City shall review the final building permits for full conformance with the approvals for the
permits listed in Condition no. 5 prior to issuance of building permits for each building/phase of
development.
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 13
12. VACATION OF PRUNERIDGE AVENUE SEGMENT
The vacation of a segment of Pruneridge Avenue is necessary to support this development. The
vacation will be processed according to procedures set by the Streets and Highways Code and the
Municipal Code. The applicant shall pay for the land included in the vacation of the segment of
Pruneridge Avenue as discussed in the Development Agreement. All public utilities within the
limits of the vacated portion of Pruneridge Avenue must be relocated to the satisfaction of the
Director of Public Works prior to recordation of the street vacation and closing of escrow on the
transfer of title.
13. WOLFE ROAD PROJECT DRIVEWAY
The Wolfe Road project driveway shall conform to Mitigation Measure TRANS-23 as adopted with
the CEQA Findings for the Apple Campus 2 EIR.
14. FITNESS CENTER FACILITIES
The approved uses at the fitness center are limited to gym activities, incidental physical therapy
and wellness checkups etc. A valid City of Cupertino business license is required for all
professional consultants who provide service at the fitness center.
15. INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT
The applicant shall use best efforts to obtain a reciprocal ingress/egress agreement from the
adjacent property owner/s of 10900 N. Tantau Avenue to facilitate the proposed driveway shown
on the approved exhibits. The agreement shall be approved by the City Attorney or his/her
designee as to form prior to recordation and shall be recorded on the property as a covenant prior
to issuance of building permits for the structure. The driveway connection to the property at 10900
N. Tantau shall not be constructed unless the reciprocal ingress/egress agreement has been
executed and recorded.
16. ACCESS DRIVEWAY
The proposed access driveway from 10900 N. Tantau Avenue shall be fully installed and
constructed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development prior to the issuance of
final occupancy of the Phase 2 construction.
17. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS
The project CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to recordation of the
final map. The CC&Rs shall incorporate requirements including but not limited to:
a. Public access easements,
b. Reciprocal ingress/egress easements,
c. Reciprocal parking easements,
d. Restrictions on the Disposal of Property subject to Condition no. 18, and
e. The deed restrictions shall contain a provision prohibiting its modification without the prior
express written approval of the Director of Community Development and the City Attorney.
18. DISPOSAL OF PROPERTIES WITHIN THE PROJECT SITE
a. Phase 1 Properties: Parking for the corporate auditorium is approved on a separate parcel
located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Pruneridge Avenue and N. Tantau
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 14
Avenue with incidental media parking (45 spaces including parking for 9 media trucks) located
on the parcel located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Pruneridge Avenue and N.
Tantau Avenue. The parcel to the northeast corner of the intersection of Pruneridge Avenue
and N. Tantau Avenue shall not be sold separately from the large parcel identified as Parcel
Three on Page P-5.03, or vice versa, without City approval. This shall be recorded in the
CC&R's referred to in Condition no. 17. In order for the City to approve sale of either of these
parcels, it must be demonstrated that adequate parking is available on Parcel One of Page P-
5.03 to meet the parking demand of the auditorium.
b. Phase 2 Properties: Parking for the Phase 2 buildings have been provided on both the east and
west side of N. Tantau Avenue. The Phase 2 parcels may not be sold individually without City
approval. This shall be recorded in the CC&R's referred to in Condition no. 17. In order for the
City to approve sale of any of these parcels individually, it must be demonstrated that either:
i. There is adequate parking on the specific parcel to meet the parking demand for the uses
on that lot; or
ii. If adjacent properties are used to share parking, that they are in close proximity to each
other, and reciprocal parking and access easements and maintenance agreements are
recorded on the applicable properties to run with the land.
19. PARKING
The applicant shall provide a minimum of 10,980 parking spaces of which a minimum of 9,240
spaces shall be provided with Phase 1 and a minimum of 1,740 spaces shall be provided with Phase
2.
20. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT
The applicant shall commit to implementing a transportation demand management (TDM) plan
incorporating solutions as listed in the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Program(MMRP) (Exhibit DP-1.) The TDM plan shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of occupancy permits.
21. PARKING LOT LIGHTING
Lighting in the parking lots shall be approved by the Director of Community Development for
compliance with applicable regulations prior to issuance of building permits.
22. BICYCLE PARKING
The applicant shall provide bicycle parking and bike racks for the proposed project in accordance
with the City's Parking Regulations under Chapter 19.124 of the Cupertino Municipal Code.
23. SPECIAL EVENTS
Special events with approximately 350 invited guests at the Corporate Auditorium are limited to
an average of one per month. Additional events, with invited guests in excess of 100, shall be
subject to the issuance of a Special Event Permit. This shall require review by the Director of
Community Development for conforxnance with the conditions of approval for special events
(Condition nos. 24 & 25) and may include review as necessary by other City departments/agencies.
Internal events intended for current Apple employees are not limited by this condition.
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 15
24. SPECIAL EVENT PARKING
Parking for special events with the number of guests specified in Condition no. 23 shall be
managed as indicated in the project description. If event parking results in overflow into the
adjacent neighborhoods, the applicant shall be required to provide an alternate parking
management plan and/or provide additional parking on site to the City's satisfaction for
subsequent events.
25. SPECIAL EVENT MANAGEMENT PLAN
The applicant shall prepare an event management plan for special events with the number of
guests specified in Condition no. 23 including but not limited to, traffic management, parking
management, visitor management, etc. prior to issuance of occupancy permits.
26. COMMUNITY LANDMARK SIGN
The applicant shall provide a Community Landmark Sign for North Vallco Park North Area
consistent with the policies of the General Plan subject to the approval of the Director of
Community Development.
27. HISTORIC RESOURCE MARKER
The applicant shall provide a Historic Resource Marker for the Glendenning Barn consistent with
the policies of the General Plan as described further in Mitigation Measure CULT-1 of the Final EIR
subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development.
28. PUBLIC ART
The applicant shall provide public art in accordance with General Plan policy 2- 66. Public art shall
be installed on the project site prior to final occupancy of the first phase. The public art shall be
valued, at a minimum, one-quarter percent (1/4%) of the total project budget, not to exceed
$100,000. The applicant shall submit a public art plan to be reviewed by the Fine Arts Commission
prior to installation of the public art.
29. SECURITY FENCE
The seven foot tall fence proposed along the perimeter of Phase 1 of the campus shall be located a
minimum of 30 feet from the back of the sidewalk except where determined to be infeasible by the
Director of Community Development. The final location of the fence shall be reviewed and
approved by the Director of Community Development.
For the N. Tantau Parking Garage and Phase 2, the security fence shall be located behind the face of
the building along any public right-of-way. Security gates at driveways may be installed subject to
administrative approval by the Director of Community Development.
A security fence may be located at all other property lines except where a Masonry Wall is
required. The sound wall proposed along I-280 is limited to the extent of the project site.
Deviations from these standards may be allowed where there are conflicts with existing trees and if
required by Building Code, subject to the review and approval of the Department of Community
Development.
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 16
30. MASONRY WALL
A masonry wall shall be provided on the project's common boundary with residentially zoned or
used property. The wall shall be eight feet in height as measured from the highest adjoining grade
unless a different height is allowed by the City of Santa Clara.
31. TEMPORARY SOUND WALL
A fifteen foot tall sound wall shall be installed around the perimeter of the project site during each
phase of construction. The sound wall shall be located a minimum of 30 feet from the inside edge
of the sidewalk. Deviations from this standard may be allowed, if locating the sound wall at this
distance from the sidewalk is deemed infeasible by the Department of Community Development.
32. GRADING, DEMOLITION, UNDERGROUND UTILITY WORK, STREET CONSTRUCTION
AND CONSTRUCTION HOUItS AND NOISE LIMITS
a. Grading activities may be performed at any time of the year, subject to storm water
management and other appropriate site preparation, as approved by the Director of Public
Works.
b. Construction hours and noise limits shall be compliant with all requirements of Chapter 10.48
of the Cupertino Municipal Code.
c. Construction, street construction, grading, underground utility and demolition work and noise
limits shall be compliant with requirements of Chapter 10.48 of the City Municipal Code.
d. Rules and regulations pertaining to all construction activities and limitations identified in this
permit, along with the name and telephone number of an applicant appointed disturbance
coordinator, shall be posted in a prominent location at the entrance to the job site.
e. The applicant shall be responsible for educating all contractors and subcontractors of the
restrictions on construction, street construction, grading, underground utility and demolition
work.
f. Applicant must obtain an encroachment permit from City prior to commencing any work
within the right-of-way.
33. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN
A construction management plan shall be prepared by the applicant and approved by the Director
of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits.
34. TREE REMOVAL
The applicant shall plant replacement trees far the Protected Trees that have been approved for
removal as identified in the MMRI' (Exhibit DP-1). The applicant shall also transplant trees as
identified in the project plans and, if transplantation is not effective, replacements shall be planted
as identified in Exhibit DP-1.
35. TREE PROTECTION
As part of the demolition or building permit drawings, a tree protection plan shall be prepared by a
certified arborist for the trees to be retained. Tree protection measures shall be consistent with the
EIR. In addition, the following measures shall be added to the protection plan:
■ For trees to be retained, chain link or other appropriate fencing and other root protection shall
be installed around the dripline of the tree prior to any project site work.
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 17
■ No parking or vehicle traffic shall be allowed over root zones, unless using buffers approved
by the Project Arborist.
■ No trenching within the critical root zone area is allowed. If trenching is needed in the vicinity
of trees to be retained, the City's consulting arborist shall be consulted before any trenching or
root cutting beneath the dripline of the tree.
■ Wood chip mulch shall be evenly spread inside the tree projection fence to a four-inch depth.
■ Tree protection conditions shall be posted on the tree protection barriers.
■ Retained trees shall be watered to maintain them in good health.
The tree protection measures shall be inspected and approved by the City's consulting arborist
prior to issuance of building permits. The City's consulting arborist shall inspect the trees to be
retained and shall provide monthly updates on the health of the trees retained in place and being
transplanted. A report ascertaining the good health of the trees mentioned above shall be provided
prior to issuance of final occupancy.
36. TREE PROTECTION BOND
The applicant shall provide a tree protection bond in the amount of $1,000,000 to ensure protection
of 845 trees to be retained in place and 90 transplant trees on the site prior to issuance of grading,
demolition or building permits. The bond shall be returned after completion of construction,
subject to a letter from the City arborist indicating that the trees are in good condition.
37. LANDSCAPE PLAN
T'he applicant shall submit detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be reviewed and approved by
the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. The landscape
plan shall include water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in conformance with
Chapter 14.15, Landscape, and the pesticide control measures referenced in Chapter 9.18,
Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the Cupertino Municipal Code.
38. LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION REPORT
The project shall comply with the Landscape Ordinance (CMC, Chapter 14.15).
39. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE
Per the Landscape Ordinance (CMC, Chapter 14.15), a maintenance schedule shall be established
and submitted to the Director of Community Development
40. SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT
A soils analysis report shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development as part of the
landscape documentation package, pursuant to Landscape Ordinance (CMC, Chapter 14.15).
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 18
41. GREEN HOUSE GAS (EIR CoA)
The calculation of construction emissions, as shown in Table V.K-2 of the Draft EIR, incorporates
the following construction protocols that are incorporated as part of the project (see Chapter III,
Project Description, of the Draft EIR) to promote the use of cleaner-burning fuels, increase
efficiency, and reduce construction-related emissions.
• To the maximum extent feasible, all construction equipment, diesel trucks, and generators
would be equipped with Best Available Control Technology for emission reductions of
nitrogen oxides and particulate matter.
• To the maximum extent feasible, all contractors would use equipment that meets the State of
Califomia Air Resources Board (ARB) most recent certification standard for off-road heavy
duty diesel engines.
• Excluding the following equipment, all diesel-powered off-road equipment used on-site
would meet U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) "Tier 2" exhaust emission
standards, and engines would be equipped with California ARB "Level 3 Verified Diesel
Emission Control Strategies" (which include diesel particulate filters) or would be certified to
meet the U.S. EPA "Tier 4 Interim" standard for particulate matter emissions. Equipment that
would meet U.S. EPA "Tier 2" exhaust emission standards but would not be equipped with
California "Leve13 Verified Diesel Emission Control Strategy" would be limited to:
o Scrapers 623G
o Scrapers 633B
o Four of the six proposed Scrapers 657G
• Trucks used at the site to haul material and/or soil would be model year 2007 or newer (or
meet equivalent U.S. EPA emission standards).
• Require all aerial and personnel lifts less than 50 horsepower to be fueled with natural gas or
propane.
• Idling time would be minimized by either shutting equipment off when not in use or by
reducing the maximum idling time to 2 minutes. Clear signage will be provided for
construction workers stating these limits at all access points.
• Construction equipment would be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with
manufacturers' specifications.
• When feasible, the project would use locally produced and/or manufactured building
materials for construction of the project.
• A minimum of 75 percent of construction and demolition waste would be diverted from
landfills, to the satisfaction of the City.
• The project would use "Green Buildulg Materials,° such as those materials that are resource
efficient, and recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way, including low
volatile organic compound (VOC)materials.
BAAQMD does not have an adopted quantitative threshold for construction GHG emissions, but
recommends the incorporation of construction practices that would reduce construction emissions.
The project applicant shall verify that the construction management plan identified in Condition
No. 33 includes the construction practices listed above to reduce construction-related GHG
emissions to a less-than-significant level.
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 19
42. FOOD USE ODOR ABATEMENT
The cafeteria and all outdoor food uses shall install odor abatement systems to reduce odor impacts
from the uses to the adjacent community. The odor abatement systems shall be installed prior to
final occupancy of the associated use(s). Detailed plans shall be reviewed and approved by the
Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits.
43. SCREENING
All mechanical and other equipment on the building or on the site shall be underground. If
undergrounding the equipment is deemed infeasible by the Director of Community Development,
equipment shall be screened so that it is not visible from public street areas or adjoining
developments. Screening materials/colors shall match building features and materials. The height
of the screening shall be taller than the height of the mechanical equipment that it is designed to
screen. The location of equipment and necessary screening shall be reviewed and approved by the
Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits.
44. UTILITY STRUCTURES
All new utility structures shall be located underground or screened from public view to the
satisfaction of the Directors of Community Development and Public Works.
45. TRASH AND DELIVERY ACTIVITIES
The applicant shall prepare a detailed refuse and truck delivery plan The plan shall specify
locations of trash facilities, refuse pick up schedules and truck delivery schedules and routes. The
final refuse and truck delivery plan shall be submitted to the Departments of Community
Development and Public Works for review and approval prior to issuance of occupancy permits.
All trash facilities must be screened and enclosed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
46. SIGN PROGRAM
Signage is not approved with this application. A sign program is required for this project per
Section 19.104.130 of the Municipal Code. The sign program shall be approved by the Director of
Community Development prior to issuance of sign permits.
47. BELOW MARKET RATE HOUSING MITIGATION FEES
The applicant shall pay housing mitigation fees in the amount and at the time set forth in the terms
of the Development Agreement.
48. FINANCIAL SURETY
The applicant shall provide financial surety, in the form of bonds or another acceptable financial
instrument, when improvements and or conditions of approval are not satisfied prior to the
applicant requesting temporary and/or final occupancy for a building, subject to the approval of
the Director of Community Development. The bond shall be returned after satisfactory completion
of the condition of approval and/or construction of the improvement within a period specified in
the temporary occupancy permit.
49. COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS
Prior to entering into a street improvement agreement with the City of Cupertino, the applicant
shall have detailed plans of the improvements approved by the Director of Public Works and shall
provide a surety or guarantee covering the cost of all improvements to be completed within the
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 20
City of Cupertino's jurisdiction. The street improvement agreement will specify the timeline for
completion of the improvements. For improvements to be completed on facilities which are not
under the jurisdiction of the City of Cupertino, the applicant shall, prior to entering into a street
improvement agreement with the City of Cupertino, have detailed plans of the improvements
approved by the agency under whose jurisdiction the facility resides, and either (1) provide a
surety or guarantee to that agency to cover the cost of the improvements; or (2) provide funding to
the agency under whose jurisdiction the facility resides, in an amount sufficient to fund the design
and construction of the improvements. The decision to pursue option (1) or (2) above shall reside
with the agency under whose jurisdiction the improvement resides, in consultation with the City of
Cupertino. In the event that the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director of
Public Works that, despite its best efforts, sufficient progress has not been made with the
responsible agency to obtain approval of the improvement, the funding shall be held in a
segregated account by the City or in escrow, in lieu of the design and construction of the mitigation
measure. The funds will be released to the responsible agency once the project is programmed and
approved, with any excess returned to the applicant.
50. FEES
The project applicant shall enter into a Street Improvement Agreement with the City of Cupertino
providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to plan checking and inspection fees,
storm drain fees and fees for permits. Said agreement shall be executed prior to construction of the
street improvements and shall be subject to all applicable fees as described in the terms of the
Development Agreement. The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee
schedule adopted by the City Council and are not in lieu development impact fees or exactions
which are subject to the terms of the Development Agreement. However, the fees imposed herein
may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the
event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee
schedule, provided that such modification is permitted by the terms of the Development
Agreement. The improvement agreement will also include the following bonds:
■ Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements
■ Labor&Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement
■ On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements.
51. STREET IMPROVEMENTS - MITIGATION MEASURES AND MITIGATION MONITORING
AND REPORTING PROGRAM
The following Mitigation Measures identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report (State
Clearinghouse # 2011082055) for the ("Apple Campus 2 Project EIR") certified by the Council on
October 15, 2013 are hereby incorporated by reference and included as conditions of approval.
a. PLAN-2 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS
b. PLAN-3 ALTERNATE CALABAZAS CREEK TRAIL
c. TRANS-1 WOLFE ROAD/I-280 NORTHBOUND RAMPS
d. TRANS-2 NORTHBOUND TANTAU AVENUE/VALLCO PARKWAY
e. TRANS-3 STEVENS CREEK BLVD/CALVERT DR/I-280 RAMPS (WEST�
f. TRANS-4 DE ANZA BOULEVARD/HOMESTEAD ROAD
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 21
g. TRANS-6 TANTAU AVENUE/HOMESTEAD ROAD
h. TRANS-8 TANTAU AVENUE/STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
i. TRANS-9A STEVENS CREEK BLVD/CALVERT DR/I-280 RAMPS (WEST�
j. TRANS-10 STEVENS CREEK BLVD/LAWRENCE EXPRESSWAY(EAST�
k. TRANS-11 LAWRENCE EXPRESSWAY/I-280 SOUTHBOUND RAMPS
1. TRANS-12 DE ANZA BLVD BET. HOMESTEAD RD AND RAINBOW DR
m. TRANS-15 WOLFE ROAD/VALLCO PARKWAY
n. TRANS-22 FREEWAY IMPACT CONTRIBUTION
o. TRANS-24 SOUTHBOUND TANTAU AVENUE/VALLCO PARKWAY
p. TRANS-25 NORTHBOUND I-280 OFF-RAMP AT WOLFE ROAD
q. TRANS-26 SOUTHBOUND I-280 OFF-RAMP AT WOLFE ROAD
r. TRANS-27 SOUTHERNMOST WOLFE ROAD DRIVEWAY TO CUPERTINO VILLAGE
s. TRANS-28 WOLFE ROAD/PROTECT ACCESS INTERSECTION
t. NOI-2 RUBBERIZED PAVEMENT TREATMENT
u. PSU-1 TRAFFIC SIGNAL PREEMPTION
The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRI'), included within Exhibit DP-1,
attached in its entirety, is hereby incorporated and all applicant/property owner obligations,
described in the sections of the MMRI' applicable to the mitigation measures listed above, are
included as conditions of this permit to ensure that the mitigation measures identified in the Apple
Campus 2 Project EIR are complied with during project implementation and operation.
52. STREET WIDENING
Public street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards,
specifications and policies and as required by the Director of Public Works.
53. DEDICATION AND STREET WIDENING ON TANTAU AVENUE
The applicant shall widen and construct a second northbound through lane/trap right turn lane on
Tantau Avenue between the main site entrance and Pruneridge Avenue. The applicant shall
dedicate land as required to accommodate this improvement.
54. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS
New curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with
grades and standards as specified by the Director of Public Works. The applicant shall close all
unused driveway cuts and remove and replace broken or uplifted curb, gutter, or sidewalk as
determined by the Director of Public Works.
55. PAVEMENT
The applicant shall overlay of all streets along perimeter with 2.5" of asphalt pavement per
Caltrans Standards.
56. RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION
As set forth in the Development Agreement, and as expressly limited by the terms thereof; any
right-of-way or property right necessary for the completion of portions of the Project or the
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 22
implementation of the MMRI'or Conditions of Approval will be the applicant's responsibility. The
City, at the applicant's expense, shall obtain an appraisal suitable for the purpose of government
acquisitions. Theapplicant shall then make diligent and good faith efforts to acquire all necessary
properties. If any of the negotiations for any of the acquisitions reach impasse, at City's request, the
applicant shall deposit with City the amount of the fair market appraisal plus estimated soft
acquisition costs and costs of proceeding, including the costs of obtaining ar seeking possession of
the property, as City reasonably determines. If the actual costs of acquisition are greater than the
deposit, the applicant will provide additional funds to City upon notice in order to pay all costs of
acquisition. City may require that applicant make periodic payments requested by City to cover
costs. Any additional remaining deposit will be returned to the applicant upon conclusion of the
acquisition.
The City does not commit to exercising the power of eminent domain to acquire any property, and
has not made any decision or commitment in regard to exercising that power. Under California
law, the determination to proceed by way of eminent domain to acquire any property or interest in
property is within the sole and exclusive authority of the City Council, and City has not waived or
relinquished any of its powers to solely decide whether, when, and on what terms it may consider,
deny, approve, or pursue acquisition by use of the power of eminent domain.
57. DROP-OFF AREAS
The Drop off areas along N. Tantau Avenue are approved as drop off areas for passenger vehicles
only. These are not approved for use by private shuttle/coach/sprinter buses. Adequate signage to
this effect shall be installed in these areas. The applicant will ensure that this restriction is
incorporated in to instructions to shuttle/coach/sprinter bus operators.
The Drop-off area indicated along Homestead Avenue near the entrance to the Fitness facility is
not approved and shall be eliminated from all development and improvement plans.
58. DETACHED SIDEWALK
The applicant shall provide a detached sidewallc, wherever feasible as determined by the Director
of Public Works, along all street frontages where construction shall occur. These include:
a. Homestead Road
b. N. Tantau Avenue
c. Vallco Parkway
d. North side of Pruneridge Avenue
e. Segment of N.Wolfe Road between I-280 and Pruneridge Avenue
f. East side of N. Tantau Avenue between Pruneridge Avenue and Homestead Road.
59. DOUBLE ROW OF TREES
The applicant shall provide a row street trees along both sides of detached sidewalk, unless
determined infeasible by the Director of Public Works.
60. GATEWAY ENTRY
The applicant shall be required to construct and install a gateway entry feature at the intersection
of N.Wolfe Road and Homestead Road that will be consistent with the policies of the General Plan.
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 23
The design will be reviewed by the Director of Community Development, if located off-site it will
require additional approval by the Director of Public Works.
61. COLORIZED BICYCLE LANES
Provide colorized bicycle lane pavement along project frontages and at areas of potential vehicular
conflict as determined by the Director of Public Works.
62. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION
Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the Director of Public Works.
63. GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the Director of Public Works in accordance with
Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code.
64. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Hydrology and pre-
and post-development hydraulic calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional
storm water control measures are to be constructed or renovated. The storm drain system may
include, but is not limited to, subsurface storage of peak stormwater flows (as needed), infiltration,
evaporation or storm water harvesting facilities, bioretention basins, vegetated swales, and
hydrodynamic separators to reduce the amount of runoff from the site and improve water quality.
The storm drain system shall be designed to detain water on-site (e.g., via buried pipes, retention
systems or other approved systems and improvements) as necessary to avoid an increase of the
ten- year storm flood water surface elevation to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
Any storm water overflows or surface sheeting should be directed away from neighboring private
properties and to the public right of way as much as reasonably possible.
65. UPSIZING OF STORM DRAIN LINES IN WOLFE ROAD, PRUNERIDGE AVENUE AND
HOMESTEAD ROAD
The applicant will be responsible for upsizing storm drain infrastruciure within Wolfe Road,
Pruneridge Avenue and Homestead Road to current City Requirements to address impacts to the
City Storm Drain system resulting from the project. Current City requirements include the ability
to convey a 10-year storm event with a 1-hour duration, as storm events are calculated per
standards set forth in the Santa Clara County Drainage Manual(2007).
66. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331
and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with
affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The applicant shall
submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior
approval of the affected Utility provider and the Director of Public Works.
67. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone cabinets and similar equipment shall be placed in underground
vaults. The applicant must receive written approval from both the Public Works Department and
the Community Development Department prior to installation of any above ground equipment.
Should above ground equipment be permitted by the City, equipment and enclosures shall be
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 24
screened with fencing and landscaping such that said equipment is not visible from public street
areas, as determined by the Community Development Department. Transformers shall not be
located in the front or side building setback area.
68. STORM WATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control
Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and
street improvement plans.
69. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT
When and where it is required by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the applicant
must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the SWRCB, which encompasses preparation of a Storm
Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs)
to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance.
70. C.3 RE UIREMENTS
C.3 regulated improvements are required for all projects creating and/or replacing impervious
surface that is subject to requirements set forth in section C.3 of the Municipal Regional Stormwater
NPDES permit. The applicant shall reserve a minimum of 4% of developable surface area for the
placement of low impact development measures, for storm water treatment, unless an alternative
storm water treatment plan, that satisfies C.3 requirements, is approved by the Director of Public
Works.
The applicant must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water
treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs), which must be designed per approved numeric
sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement,
Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing
operation and maintenance of treatment BMPs are each required.
All storm water management plans are required to obtain certification from a City approved third
party reviewer.
71. EROSION CONTROL PLAN
The applicant shall provide an approved erosion control plan prepared by a Registered Civil
Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site.
Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. The plan shall also be incorporated as an
attachment to the SWPPP and shall be updated and amended as construction phases or site
conditions change.
72. WORK SCHEDULE
Every 6 months, the applicant shall submit a work schedule to the City to show the timetable for all
grading/erosion control work in conjunction with this project.
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 25
73. WATER BACKFLOW PREVENTERS
Domestic and Fire Water Backflow preventers and similar above ground equipment shall be placed
away from the public right of way and site driveways, and in a location approved by the Cupertino
Community Development Department, Santa Clara County Fire Department and the water
company.
74. OPERATIONS &MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
The applicant shall enter into an Operations & Maintenance Agreement with the City prior to final
occupancy. The Agreement shall include the operation and maintenance for any non-standard
appurtenances in the public right-of-way that may include, but is not limited to, sidewalk, pavers,
enhanced landscaping, landscaping necessary to screen utility cabinets, and street lights.
75. BUS STOP LOCATION
The applicant shall improve bus shelters/trash receptacles along the Wolfe Road, Tantau Avenue,
Vallco Parkway and Homestead Road project frontages, and as required by VTA for bus route
modifications due to the Pruneridge Ave closure. The placement and design of the bus
shelters/trash receptacles shall be approved by the Director of Public Works and the VTA.
Locations and the design of bus stops and shelters shall be provided to the satisfaction of the
Director of Public Works and the VTA. Enhanced shelters shall be maintained and funded by the
applicant. In the event that bus shelters are replaced by the VTA with standard revenue-generating
bus shelters, the applicant shall not be required to maintain and service these bus shelters.
Shelters shall, at a minimum, include the following features:
■ ADA accessible dimensions
■ Concrete pad per VTA criteria
■ Illuminated line number sign
■ Passenger shelters
■ Benches
■ Trash receptacles
■ Real-time information panels
■ Schedule, fare, and service span information
• Lighting
76. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN
The applicant must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved by
the Director of Public Works, for any work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for all
vehicles used during construction. All traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the
Director of Public Works prior to commencement of work. The City has adopted the Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards for all signage and striping work throughout
the City.
77. TRAFFIC SIGNS
Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City.
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 26
78. FULL TRASH CAPTURE SYSTEM
The applicant will be responsible for installing a full trash capture system/device to capture trash
from the onsite storm drain system before the storm water reaches the City owned storm drain
system. A full capture system or device is a single device or series of devices that traps all particles
retained by a 5 mm mesh screen and has a design treatment capacity of not less than the peak flow
rate Q resulting from a one-year, one-hour storm in the sub-drainage area (see the Municipal
Regional Permit section C.10 for further information/requirements).
79. TRASH ENCLOSURES
The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
Approval of the trash enclosure plan by the Director of Public Works is needed prior to obtaining a
building permit.
80. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS
The applicant shall obtain clearance from the Director of Public Works in regards to refuse truck
access for the proposed development.
81. STREET TREES
Street trees planted within the Public Right of Way shall be to the satisfaction of the Director of
Public Works and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125.
82. FIRE HYDRANT
Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as
needed.
83. STREAMSIDE PERMIT
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide plans and information that
satisfies the requirements of the Stream Side Development Permit as set forth by the Santa Clara
Valley Water Resources Protection Collaborative. These items include, but are not limited to,
topographic survey, specific measures to protect streams and/or water bodies from water quality
impacts, coordination with all interested jurisdictional agencies, and the like.
84. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CLEARANCE
Clearance approvals from the Santa Clara Valley Water District are required prior to issuance of a
building permit. The applicant shall pay for and obtain a Water District permit for activities or
modifications within the District easement or fee right of way or affecting District facilities.
85. CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE COMPANY CLEARANCE
Provide California Water Service Company approval for water connection, service capability and
location and layout of water lines and backflow preventers before issuance of a building permit
approval.
86. DEDICATION OF UNDERGROUND WATER RIGHTS
The applicant shall "quitclaim" all interests in, and grant to the City authorization to extract water
from (without entering the applicant's property), the underground strata lying beneath and within
the boundary limits of the project's property.
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 27
87. ABANDONED WATER WELLS
The applicant shall seal abandoned or unused water wells if the City, in consultation with the Santa
Clara Valley Water District, determines that said abandoned or unused water wells have a
potential to contaminate the water supply.
88. SANITARY DISTRICT
A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Cupertino Sanitary District prior to
issuance of building permits.
89. UTILITY EASEMENTS
Clearance approvals from the agencies with easements on the property and utilities in Pruneridge
Avenue (including PG&E, AT&T, and California Water Company, Cupertino Sanitary District
and/or equivalent agencies) will be required prior to entering into street improvement agreement.
90. EMERGENCY VEHICLE PREEMPTION FUND
As set forth in the Development Agreement, and as expressly limited by the terms thereof; In
addition to complying with Mitigation Measure PSU-1 of the MMRP, the applicant shall fund
similar traffic signal preemption throughout the City at a cost not to exceed Three Hundred
Twenty Thousand Dollars ($320,000) (the "Traffic Signal Preemption Contribution"). The applicant
shall pay amounts requested within thirty (30) days after receipt of City's invoice, accompanied by
reasonable documentation supporting City's installation of the signal preemption covered by the
invoice.
91. CONSTRUCT EMPLOYEE SMOKING AREAS AROUND THE PROJECT SITE
The applicant will be responsible for constructing smoking areas around the project site to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Smoking areas should be placed in convenient
locations near project entrances. No more than eight (8) areas (or as directed by the Director of
Public Works) should be provided around the Apple Campus 2 sites, with one being located near
the Pruneridge Ave, Wolfe Road and Homestead Road pedestrian entrances, and others at key
Tantau Ave Pedestrian entrances. Smoking areas should be equipped with adequate ash trays to
aid in cigarette filter disposal and to discourage littering of cigarette filters. The areas should be
designed with an attention to litter prevention and to prevent discarded cigarette filters from
entering the storm drain system.
92. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
All design criteria and specifications set forth in the design-level geotechnical report shall be
implemented as a condition of project approvaL The applicant will be responsible for providing a
geotechnical engineering review letter stating that the final approved set of plans has been
reviewed and meet the intent and recommendations of the geotechnical report.
93. PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALKS
The applicant shall provide pedestrian crosswalk improvements around the project site. This
includes providing crosswalks at the Wolfe Road/Apple Campus 2 driveway entrance to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Final crosswalk improvement plans shall be reviewed
and approved by the Director of Public Works.
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 28
94. PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ENHANCEMENTS AT WOLFE ROAD AND INTERSTATE 280
RAMPS
The six Interstate 280 ramps at Wolfe Road include the following:
• Northbound I-280 On-Ramp from southbound Wolfe Road
� Northbound I-280 On-Ramp from northbound Wolfe Road
• Northbound I-280 Off-Ramp
■ Southbound I-280 On-Ramp from northbound Wolfe Road
• Southbound I-280 On-Ramp from southbound Wolfe Road
� Southbound I-280 Off-Ramp
The applicant shall replace all crosswalks at the on-ramps with new crosswalks which are
perpendicular to the ramps, incorporate high-visibility ladder striping, and yield limit lines. The
applicant shall install high-visibility ladder striping at the crosswalks at the two off-ramps. The
applicant shall also provide ADA-compliant curb ramps for all crosswalks.
Additionally, at the southbound I-280 loop on-ramp from southbound Wolfe Road, the applicant
shall replace the existing fence on the overcrossing with one that has better transparency, trim and
maintain vegetation on northwest corner of the on-ramp, relocate the curb ramp further north
along the highway on-ramp; and add pavement legends to indicate a pedestrian crossing. To the
extent that Caltrans approval is required, this Condition shall be subject to the limitations set out in
Condition no. 49.
95. FUNDING OF POTENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD CUT-THROUGH TRAFFIC AND PARKING
INTRUSION MONITORING AND MITIGATION PROGRAM
The applicant shall fund neighborhood cut-through traffic and parking monitoring studies and
provide fees to implement needed traffic calming improvements to minimize neighborhood cut-
through traffic and parking intrusion within the cities of Santa Clara and Sunnyvale. The applicant
shall provide up to $250,000 for the City of Santa Clara and up to $500,000 for the City of
Sunnyvale for neighborhood cut-through traffic and parking intrusion measures. These
contributions will be provided to the City of Cupertino prior to issuance of the first building permit
for the project.
The applicant shall also fund all baseline and monitoring studies as required above and beyond the
amounts specified above. The monitoring program shall include the following items: (1)
identifying the monitoring areas (roadways where the monitoring will occur; (2) determining
baseline conditions (number of parked vehicles and traffic volumes on the roadways); (3)
determining thresholds for parking and traffic volume increases requiring action (per Santa Clara
and Sunnyvale Traffic Calming Programs); (4) establishing the monitoring schedule; and (5)
creating reporting protocols. The baseline conditions shall be established prior to but within 1 year
of initial occupancy. Monitoring would then occur annually for 5 years.
If parking spillover is identified as a problem as part of the annual parking monitoring, the
applicant shall provide a detailed parking management strategy for review and ultimate approval
by the Director of Community Development. The parking management strategy should show
conclusively that the parking supply provided on the site would meet the expected demand (both
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 29
for daily operations and special events). Examples of the types of strategies the applicant may
include in the parking management strategy include the following:
■ Periodic surveys to measure employee parking demand rates
■ Employee education campaigns
■ Periodic monitoring of employee parking on streets surrounding the project site which
includes license plate checks
■ Parking cash-out program
■ Additional valet parking assistance beyond that currently proposed with the project
■ Additional personnel and signage to direct parking during special events
■ Other TDM measures to discourage single-occupancy driving and reduce parking demand on
the site
If spillover parking in nearby neighborhoods occurs even after implementation of the measures
above, the following should be implemented:
■ Parking restrictions on Forge Drive implemented by the City with funding from the applicant
for design and physical improvements (such as signs, striping, curb painting and the like) and
construction/installation of all such measures.
■ Provision of additional parking spaces on-site to meet the parking demand, to the satisfaction
of the Director of Community Development. Such additional parking would be subject to
supplemental environmental review.
■ Implementation or funding of a neighborhood parking permit program, signage, curb
painting, or other parking restriction measures.
96. LEFT-TURN POCKET EXTENSIONS
Left-turn pockets shall be extended at the De Anza Boulevard/Stevens Creek Boulevard
intersection (westbound pocket), Wolfe Road/Homestead Road intersection (westbound pocket),
Wolfe Road/Vallco Parkway intersection (southbound pocket), Tantau Avenue/Homestead Road
intersection (westbound pocket), and Tantau Avenue/Stevens Creek Boulevard intersection
(eastbound pocket). The applicant shall reconstruct medians and restripe roadways as necessary to
construct the extended turn pockets.
97. VALLCO PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS
The applicant shall reconfigure Vallco Parkway between Perimeter Road and Tantau Avenue to
two vehicle lanes and one bike lane in each direction, plus diagonal parking on the south side,
including any associated improvements such as,but not limited to, median relocation In addition,
the applicant shall design and install a traffic signal at the Main Street project garage entrance onto
Vallco Parkway.
98. SARATOGA AVENUE/LAWRENCE EXPRESSWAY
The applicant shall provide a $1,000,000 fair share contribution to Santa Clara County for the
purpose of constructing an additional left-turn lane from Saratoga Avenue onto northbound
Lawrence Expressway.
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 30
99. INTERSTATE 280 SOUTHBOUND ON-RAMP AT LAWRENCE EXPRESSWAY
The applicant shall construct a third lane on the southbound on-ramp to Interstate 280 at Lawrence
Expressway between Lawrence Expressway and the metering lights. The applicant shall also
construct a third eastbound lane along the connector road between Calvert Drive and Lawrence
Expressway. The applicant shall provide detailed construction plans and shall construct the
improvement. If the applicant cannot get approval for the improvement, the applicant shall
provide up to a maximum of $1,730,729 to design and construct either (1) the identified
improvement or (2) an alternate improvement that will address on-ramp queuing at the I-280
southbound ramp at Lawrence Expressway to the satisfaction of the City of Cupertino Director of
Public Works and Caltrans. The $1,730,729 is the difference between the estimated cost of the
identified improvement, and the estimated cost of mitigation measure TRANS-11, which is an
element of the identified improvement. The process described in Condition no. 49 for
improvements outside of the City of Cupertino shall govern the implementation of this condition.
100. GLENDENNING BARN RELOCATION
As set forth in the Development Agreement, and as expressly limited by the terms thereof; if, and
only if, the Glendenning Barn is relocated off the Project Site, the applicant shall pay city Two
Million Six Hundred Forty Four Thousand and Thirty-Five Dollars ($2,644,035) (the "Glendenning
Barn Relocation Contribution"), which represents the agreed upon costs of acquiring or providing
a relocation site for the Glendenning Barn on City-owned property, the cost of improvements to the
relocation site and the Glendenning Barn, the net present value of annual maintenance expenses,
and additional amounts for capital repair costs anticipated in years ten and twenty. The applicant
will pay such amount to City within thirty (30) days after receipt of City's written demand, which
may be given at any time following relocation of the Glendenning Barn; provided,however, if City
opts to acquire a new site for the Glendenning Barn rather than locate the Glendenning Barn on an
existing City-owned site, then the applicant will deposit up to $1,000,000 of the Glendenning Barn
Relocation Contribution in the escrow established for City's purchase of such new site so that the
funds can be applied towards the purchase price payable by City at closing, in which case the
balance of the Glendenning Barn Relocation Contribution will be payable by the applicant
following relocation of the Glendenning Barn as provided above.
101. FIBER OPTIC CONDUIT INSTALLATION.
As set forth in the Development Agreement, and as expressly limited by the terms thereof; install
an additional separate fiber optic conduit along Wolfe Road between the 280 Freeway and
Homestead Road, solely in order to accommodate City's usage. The fiber optic conduit shall be
installed in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the Director of Public Works.
102. INDEMNIFICATION
To the extent permitted by law, the applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, its City
Council, its officers, employees and agents (the "indemnified parties") from and against any claim,
action, or proceeding brought by a third party against the indemnified parties and the applicant to
attack, set aside, or void this recommendation or any permit or approval authorized hereby for the
project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City its actual attorneys' fees and costs
incurred in defense of the litigation The applicant and City shall use best efforts to select mutually
agreeable legal counsel to defend such action, and the applicant shall pay all compensation for such
legal counsel, following the applicant's receipt of invoices from City, together with reasonable
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 31
supporting documentation. Such compensation shall include reasonable compensation paid to
counsel not otherwise employed as City staff and shall include City Attorney time and overhead
costs and other City staff overhead costs and any costs directly related to the litigation reasonably
incurred by City. If the applicant and the City cannot in good faith agree on joint counsel, the City
shall have the right to retain counsel of its own choosing, separate from the applicant's litigation
counsel.
103. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS,RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such
fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further
notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If
you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section
66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions.
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADMINISTERED BY THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY
FIRE DEPARTMENT
104. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Santa Clara County Fire Department
prior to issuance of building permits. Clearance should include written approval of the location of
any proposed Fire Backflow Preventers, Fire Department Connections and Fire Hydrants (typically
Backflow Preventers should be located on private property adjacent to the public right of way, and
fire department connections must be located within 100' of a Fire Hydrant). The project must also
provide, to the satisfaction of the Fire Department, an Emergency Vehicular Access path/road
within the project site.
105. FIRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED
An automatic sprinkler system shall be provided throughout all new buildings and structures, as
required by State and locally adopted laws, codes and regulations.
106. PRIVATE ON-SITE FIRE HYDRANT(S)
The applicant shall provide private on-site fire hydrants at locations to be determined by the Fire
Department. Maximum hydrant spacing shall be 500 feet, with a minimum acceptable flow of 1,500
GPM at 20 psi residual pressure.
107. STANDPIPES
� In addition to the standpipes required by 905 of the California Building Code, standpipes shall
additionally be installed in the office building courtyard and at other locations determined by the
Fire Department.
108. TIMING OF REQUIRED WATER SUPPLY INSTALLATIONS
Installation of required fire service and fire hydrants shall be tested and accepted by the Fire
Department prior to the presence of bulk combustible materials on site. Building permit issuance
may be withheld until required installations are completed, tested, and accepted.
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 32
109. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS (GENERAL)
Provide apparatus access roadways with an all-weather surface within 150 ft. of the exterior walls
of all buildings. Access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet and a vertical
clearance of 13 feet 6 inches. Turn radii shall be per Fire Department specifications. NOTE:
Apparatus access shall be provided from entrances on Wolfe and Tantau.
110. FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROADS -AERIAL APPARATUS
a. Where required: Buildings or portions of buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet (9144 mm) in
height above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access shall be provided with
approved fire apparatus access roads capable of accommodating fire department aerial
apparatus.
b. Width: Aerial fire apparatus access roads shall have a minimum unobstructed width of 26 feet
and shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building,
and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building and/or as approved by the
Fire Department.
111. EXTERIOR ALARM ANNUNCIATOR
An exterior fire alarm annunciator, as is acceptable to the Fire Department, shall be provided for
emergency vehicles arriving at the Wolfe and Tantau entrances. A written procedure shall be
developed for notifying emergency personnel of the incident type and location upon their arrival at
the Wolfe entrance.
112. TRAFFIC SIGNAL PREEMPTION
Intersection signal preemption shall be installed per the requirements of Condition no. 90.
113. FIRE COMMAND CENTER
A Fire Command Center room, accessible from the exterior of the building, shall be provided and
shall contain the fire alarm control panels and other building controls that may be necessary to
operate/monitor under emergency conditions.
114. EMERGENCY RESPONDER RADIO COVERAGE IN BUILDINGS
All buildings shall have approved radio coverage for emergency responders within all portions the
buildings, based upon the existing coverage levels at the exterior of the building. Additional
systems, components or equipment shall be provided, as necessary, to provide radio coverage
levels.
SECTION VI: CEQA REVIEW
An Environmental Impact Report for the Subdivision was prepared in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act(CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.
Resolution No.6731 ASA-2011-14,DP-2011-04,TR-2011-39,U-2011-11 October 2,2013
Page 33
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of October, 2013, Special Meeting of the Plaruzing Commission of
the City of Cupertino, State of California,by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chair Sun, Vice Chair Brophy, Takahashi, Gong
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: none
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: none
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Lee
ATTEST: APPROVED:
.
�-`-----_j -
_�-
EXHIBIT DP-1
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
A. INTRODUCTION
This document describes the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program(MMRP)for ensuring
the effective implementation of the mitigation measures adopted by the City of Cupertino(City) and
made conditions of approval of the Apple Campus 2 Project(project).The project would entail the
redevelopment of an approximately 176-acre project site into a new campus for Apple Inc. (Apple).
When a lead agency adopts findings pursuant to Section 21081 of the California Environmental
Quality Act(CEQA)� and Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelinesz upon completion of an Environmen-
tal Impact Report(EIR),it is required to adopt a reporting and monitoring program pursuant to
Section 21081.6 of CEQA and Section 15097 of the CEQA Guidelines.The purpose of the MMRP is to
ensure compliance with the measures adopted to mitigate or avoid significant environmental impacts
during project implementation.This MMRP will not only direct the implementation of mitigation
measures by the specified responsible parties,but also facilitate the City's monitoring,compliance,
and reporting activities,including the activities of any third-party monitors it may designate.
B. PROJECT BACKGROUND
The project site is currently developed with structures that contain office and research and
development uses. These existing structures will be demolished and replaced with new development
as part of the project.The project involve the construction of 3,420,000 square feet of office,research,
and development uses;245,000 square feet of auditorium,fitness center,and parking reception uses;
92,000 square feet of utility plants;and parking and ancillary buildings(such as security receptions
and landscape maintenance buildings).As part of the project,a segment of Pruneridge Avenue will
be vacated by the City to allow for the development of a unified and secure campus and Apple will
also implement changes to local roadways in the vicinity of the project site.The environmental effects
of the project are analyzed and identified in the Apple Campus 2 Project Final EIR.
The Final EIR identifies potentially significant impacts and mitigation measures in the following
areas:
• planning policy
• land use
�The California Environmental Quality Act is found at Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. I�ereinafter,
the MMRP will refer to the Public Resources Code sections of CEQA as"Section[number]of CEQA."
'The State CEQA Guidelines("Guidelines")are found at California Code of Regulations,Title 14,Section 15000 et
seq.
1
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
AUGUST 2013 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
• biological resources
• culiural resources
• geology,seismicity,and soils
• hydrology and water quality
• hazards and hazardous materials
• transportation and circulation
• noise
• air quality
• public services and utilities
C. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
As the lead agency under CEQA,the City will be responsible for ensuring full compliance with the
provisions of this MMRP and will have primary responsibility for implementation of the MMRI'.The
City has the authority to halt any activity associated with the construction and operation of the Apple
Campus 2 project if the activity is determined to be a deviation from the approved project or the
adopted mitigation measures.
D. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
The attached table presents a compilation of the mitigation measures in the Final EIR,together with
the required monitoring and reporting actions,and timing.
The attached table includes columns that show: (1)each mitigation measure identified in the Final
EIR;(2)the procedure for implementing each mitigation measure;(3)the City entity responsible and
procedure for monitoring and reporting implementation of each mitigation measure; (4)the timing
for implementation of each mitigation measure;and(5)verification of mitigation measure
completion.
2
T EIR
pYYLE C RgPOATiNGOpRpGRADi
hl1TiGAT10C7 b10NiTOR1NG AND
pate
Con,plete�
Timi�$ Slgnatuze
t�c• o�sibl�ratty�
LSA ASSBERA�p13 ��'��
S E P T E M Monitoring Action
pYOCec�uxe as �ate:
Imp�en'enting ��nds to be paid
w oxks in tk'e Signa�re�
Measuxe o f Public indicated
Ntitigation ,�e Dixector pevelopn'enr
o�sor S�iall e�t.ox en�.
NrIING P�LICY �e pTOject sp
shall either� p,&reem
t th�pay'�` of 1.
IV PLA xo ect spo�sox sha11 eitheT� e artment of (12 R lleC a dedic�aoits 1
e p l the D P eceiv Topexty,
-�LAN_1:Th fol1owing am t � �
�1�pay oun
implement°ne°f the �atks,the acreS°f p
publi� �he�evelop�'en� Ci�'
options: ds fox the stated in sat�sfaction• Tovided,�he
ent fun roperty en�f°x�'1e ark or If funds aze p utsue the
a pxovide suf£ici 1 acres of P AYzeem o¢the P ael p t of
of 1• a��uisition �d shall ach aevelop�Len
a�quisition £ox�tuxe�axk designate, roject
y the City �urchase, design and Yf the p
b �2� 1.1 acres of ,�e patk spa�e• edicate
ent;�r otl�er
de°e�Opm unless d�o�ex�to the City• S onsox choases t� uixes fOT
b p,gTee to purcha$e� edby p Ulred�r pTOper�,it o�s�a�a
roperty�uTrently°`'vn ate,and ert�'to be a�q ose,the location has
P osed),design PrOp shal1
� be t�s purp b the C�ty
Apple 1S pzoP .��acxes �uxchase the City and to be aPprOVed y Cit
the City as Parks and ap�joVed bY t be table„the Y
dedicate to Ci� develop�'en �d��acCep planning
e�sewhexe in the Suitable for u$e as park Shall work With the Council
Sub�ect to the oing and Ciry
ppex�Space� rovided and ong Sy�all take ssion
of the City�p ,�e Ciry Corn`Y"i the pYOpexty as
Sat�sfaction ublicly spaCe' t eXastiny,and to desig�*ate
d wouldbe I' S aCe�n�he �ate:
tl�e lan into a��oun hbox_ a�d��en P to enterin�
fa�re need for neig parks a tl�pxiox
accessible. W�de park Cl ,S Zonin M � art- S1gnatuTe�
hoQd and City- NJorks�eP into a stxeet
.�ie I'ublic d 1mpYOVement
spaCe' shall ment shall te��e�`'an
�e pTO�e�t Sponsor the b�cy�le ent,the
fox the lans£Ox agreem �r Shall
lans aPpxOVe p xo}ect spons
onsoY Shall Submi�detailed p edestrian p lans
ect sP have p
The�'xO� zneasures to ortation and p tified�n
pC,AN-2: ttansp �'�LA� . improVements lden LpN-2. approVed bY the
the f ollow'ng ements'den 2 easure P
implement o£the City� Mitigation M {hat the in�ludes
imprOv
Mitigatiox�MeasUxe shall veYif`I Ci wh�ch
the Satisfactio� N,here the Pr°�e�t The Cl�}' 3
and, S are
a Fund,construct, It+addition, Submltted lan
vide dedica�to��fox 5�ia11:
necessaryeP�°t1�c1udinK sponsor
Yeal pxop desigr�,
construcn°n�`d
plaz►nin�,
CT gtR
�yYLE C R�QORTING�p��GRAN
M(TiGAT10N b10NiTORiNG AND
�ate
Campletedl
Timing natuYe
nssoc�nTES. �N�� lepa�yt
Si$
�sn zo,3 gesponsib
S g p T E M B E R onitoring A�tion
pYOCeduxe M or othex
Implementing bonds
ith o�her to guaxantee
ents SuTe� en�s•
ation'Measuxe �onsistent�''� rovem rovem
IVlitig d S oTtation imp d t1ie imP
1 Fund��onstxuct,an tran p for the area,an
edications of real plo�osed Subject
edes�rian, t ) �2���ding
that the Pl�`S leave no
all bike,P provide d exe�ecessaxy) f or bike, S of the
maintenance)r Sidewalk ht_ property�wh �onnectivity$aPs to term
1�,dscapi�Y��d ublic xig pedestrian, dlsabled �evelopn'en�
en�s in the� for all bike, �d Sidewalk pedestrian and ent.
improvem etties ��ds�aping, ublic transP°xt. p,�xeem
along all prop ents in tY'e P person
of-waY �ast Ho�estead im�TOVem
boundedby �renue� ht_af-Way along all East
Road,N�r�`Tantau p' orth W olfe �S unded by
and N propexties bo N�rth
�lallco ParkwaY� where the Homestead Road,
goad In locations aCent to p,venue,V allco
ents are a�) Tan�au and Noith Wolfe
impxOVem ast pro)ect
pTOpe�,with desigr►details shall Paxk�'ay,
Road.
a�pxovals,the d coz�stxuct a
yaith all other �2)�und ax� e alang
be consistent xoved by�'e �,vay_finding schem t West
impro�eme�ts aPP �ter�ate e�"
the e�'t�xe ro ect site.
City• finding around��1e p �
along �pOP
coordinated Way- 3 Funa a�d construct
b• A e Shallbe 1ntTOduced
S�hem west loop e�a��ed bike lanes�
altex��te east- fen�i�'g,,
the ent�xe Qad,East aths, d
�Northwolfe R arkway, pedestrian plf�easible),�
RoadJ V allco P axd rails(� li h�ng,
Honnestead p,venue).W aY" � Scaled �
andN�rthTa�tau designed pedestrian- orthwolfeRoad
e Shall be along the N
finding Signag and residents,
vex I-2$ '
visitars bxidge o
to orien� ea attracrions, d�d construct
pointing the�'tO� bicycle (4)Fun �le and pedestxian
edestxian ax'd ortant othe�b�.�y
retail aTeas,P otheT ln'p enities,as identified in
access routes,a�d Sha��a�So be am itted plans•
S� ns an foot or �,e subn' �easures G
destinations. g cle�d (5)See Mitigarion
designed ta direct those
o�bike to the Sa£est bicy ex
edeStxian x°u
tes,
as well as o�
T E�R
R NG AND ftEpORTIN� pR�C'RAM
MITIGATlO
N h10NiT0
p ate
Co�►Pletedl
Ttmin� SI�a�Ye
pSSOCIATES+1NC.
onsible paxtyl
ReSp pction
SEPTE4ut8ER 2��3 Manitorin�
ImPlementing PYOCed�xe
Mitigation NLeasuTe ,�RANS_ZSf
�Ng-23, LAN-3•
enities• ,�,I�Ng-29 ax'd P
am tru�t A�A
cle arid PedestYian d cons
bicy edestxian �6��und�` ents
lanes,p
� .E�h�ced bike rails(if imprO�em itted
�uard ra�'p in the Subm
aths,fen�ingf scaled lderitified
p d edestzian-
feasible),an p e installed along t�'e p�ans.
ligh�W o fe Road bridge°�er I-
�1oi
�t 1� cle and pedestrian
ez b Y as�iigh�isibili�y
d. "
amen�ties,such edeSttians
cxosswalks,"yield eae tTian
Sl�a�e,leadinga�zed
at sig other�ublically
inteT°als d
intersections,an b��ycle
accessib�e ame�ti.es�e•g'�
ben�heSr attra�tive d
Tacks, ted li�hhng��
pedestrian-orien the��oject site
lands�ap'ng)along ese
shall be installed.�
eter e designed tO
peT�m sha11 b
eY,ities d
a��TOVe the Safety texn�tive m°des
attractive�ess of al
ra�el witivn�he°icini�'°f the
of t
project site. a�1Qn Measures
e. Implement M1tig�NS-28(to
,�p,NS-23 ana Safe�r at the 5
impxp°e pedestti Pxo�ect A�cess _
Noxth
W olfe Roa�NS-29(to
inteTSection)%T�txian
ex�hax`�e tre edes
CT EIR
ApeLE C REY�RT�NG 4R�GRAh1
M`T1GAT��N AtON�T�RtNG AND
pate
Completedt
Timing Slgnature
sib1e�'a�y�
Resp°�' Action
��A ����E�A��3, iN�- MOnitOri�g
SEYTEMB rxoceduxe
ImPlementi�g
�rlitigat1On
Measure
2gQ ramps
men�,at tl�e 1- �,�p,N_3�to
en�iron ad};an� s
w�thV�iolfe R� CalabaZa
n alternate
cons�ruct a ike trail}.
CTeek pedestx icax,�'itl�Disabiliries
f. Upd��e�'�x`ex
t the f�llo�^�ing
Act(A�A}tamp Mall overpass on
S.vallco rtl�U�und
�ocation • oad;no
Noxth w°olfeRoad atI-a80o°�k
Nortl� `,�,ithupda{e thVVolfe
on_rampj d�°T �niith
striping;280 noz Y`°n�ramp� est
t I- ing;�'`' pate�
Road a y,ralk stxip
updated cross d at to entex��'�
Noxth�lVolfe�°a I'riot � Sl�ature'
side of �enuei an at unity into a StYee
Pruneridge A ol£e R�ad The CO�De�,artmen� vement
dNoxthw shall t1) imPxo
thb�un witr onsox
SOU �,off-xamp� xo}ect sp �evelopn'eworks and agxeemen bQnds�T
Stri iY' ' (1)�e p truct a and public view in�ludin$
I-2g�SOU cxosswalk Shall �,nd cons ate ent shall re ��an to
U dated onsox fund altern Depaxtm �onstru otheY Sule�
The project sp es�� pedestzian(b'ke fxom lans tO the
3: �,easur ding, rove p ike ntee e
�L�'ement the folloWing txail e tio of N�r�' app ate pedeStT�an(� guara e�t�t1�
cxeek altern d shall�°rk lmprovem
impl e City,as trail�` pz sh�11
re IV-3: the inteTSe� and creek To�e�t Spo�sox ta xo�e�t spons
�e satisfa�tt°n of�
inFi� T�taa Avenue tht� �Y,e p its p lanS
illustrated ��to�Y,e Creek,sou �lth ne�essary perm have p
�und and�onstru Calabazas Qr,both a�quixe d'e the ttail. a��TOVedby the
of t1�e City a kwaY� �au ction of
a' ction creek V allco P ar f ox const� 6
Satisfa e alternate ofNpzthT�` ,�epublicw°rks
sides �d t�en west
pedeStrianN'k from tl�e (2)
ding ,I,a��au p,venue� Slde of
trail exten of North �he north
d PTUnexldge p,venuer alonY�
ir�ersection
Avenue an wa ,
onb�th
�ou��o V allco
park
E D gOJECT ElR
pYPL C�MppRTiNG YROGRADS
ING
AN RE
M�TIGATION DtONtT��
pate
Completed!
Tin,ing Sl�nature
ASSOCIAT�s' lN�� �aL��
►.s A �o�3 ReSponsible
sEYT EMBER Monitoring p'ction
Implementing P=O�eduxe City.
N1,easuxe Department shall��f�ox a of funding is
�liitigation to be used Tim�ng
a tO the $250,004 d of a full ect to teTms of
Vall�oparkw 9 subj
Calabazas feasibility S� y t�a�l�in the ev�lopm,ent
Tantau Avenue' inteTSection° $e arated the D
of North oxth side �ncludin$an Class 1 P �n Mlti$ation ent.
sideS the� Cxeek� ecified �,�reem
and then`^'est a1ong bination of aze�Sp ,�e Cl�,
to the apptopriate com pLAN-3�
�f Vallco ParkWaY tified amenities Meas�xe dingj as
of Calabazas Cteek• {he iden 1 othex fun
t far landscaping,1ig11ting, Shall supp Y
intersection to�aertake the
diz�g shal]accoun te•g�� xecxearional needed,
`�'��' collaboTa�'On xest axeas, �d shall active1Y
lanning�design, d en�.ties�. studY �tion of the
P cies,� am onsor sha1� constru
�,•rith o�er agen �e pzoject sp pursue
maintenanCe° d i�the sum of
construction and �,e txail t2) txail if feasible•
trail xoute. artially�11 ' d
the alterna{e bination of the p p00,a feasibility stu Y
a com �250, arated
shall includeatures that xeferea�ce o�a full Class I sep
folloWing where xights�of-way
Creek: txai1, a1pnS the
Calabazas {he YouYe are adequate,
. Signage along e�ha�,el that r I 280
both drainag ound "
inclu ding m� S�d arallel to so u t hb
�,,jayfindingl p Y,abitat and betweez�North De A�'�a
informa�ion on creek Calabazas
Bo��evaxd and south along
ecolog9� lantingS tha� Creek,and the�
Appropriate p �he WeS�exn bank of
' side habitats a�*d Creek to V aI�CO
mi�ic cxeek- oint CalabaZas
pTOVide a linear tefs de po�O�S park�'aY.
between�he�reek-
d�1e trail detour
of the trail an
�wheTevex possible);
Special pedestxia�scaled
� ligl�ting; tables at tTai� ,�
. Rest areas oT picnic
intersections alor►g North
ue a�d V allco
Tantau Aven
g1R
ApP�E D REp�RT►N�'oYRQGRAFt
RtN�' AN
M�T1G�T��N �toN`TO
pate
�omPletedl
Sl�,atuYe
Tin''n�
ible rartyl
�N�• gesp�"s p�CtioT►
�t AT ES, Monitoxin�
SEYTEMBEjt 2��3 1'tO�QduYe
Im41emertin�
Measute
Mitiga{1On
park�^'ay
,as e�ou ees rectea�lO�'�
1���'��ght�iile a1sQ n°t
nature w its role as a
inlshi�� Yo te;
di�' u
oYtation
trans�onal Te�reatiox'a1
. Add ch as water Clesi
ties Su e�epta
anlen1 d�xasr T
fountai�an eznen�'
. APprOpTlate pa° eren�e�'he
ents that zef d
treatnl d�ax�`,atex;�` uaxd
creek�' cing�d��x g
tive fen ta�Ave�ue
. Ue�Oxa as
NoxthTan�eT Calab�
xails o�' ebridge o
ver�"28�
along tl� d tlie br�a�'e�eets
Cr a Wh xe the cx th mefexen�e
a� ca Pa�kWa�f tihen the
V all �en�
the creek and s
between t e
litteax connection detoUr,
e�rail
�,d th
creek the Sum of
b Pattially
f a Sd�,aY of a f�ll Class 1
�OQ re xlglits-of-
�$e�arated trail,W�'e e 8
aze adequate,alo�g n paralle1
waY annel tt'a
dTalnage ch d�2g�between
to southb�u�' aBoule�ard�'nd
nz sauth
N alabD as Teek,and t1�en
C
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
SEPTEMBER 2013 MITIGATION D10NITORING AND REPORT[NG PROGRAM
Responsible Party/ Date
Mitigation Measure Implementing Procedure Timing Completed/
Monitoring Action
Signature
along the western bank of
Calabazas Creek to Vallco
Parkway.The study would only
assess the feasibility of such a trail
in the general area.If the City
determines such a trail is feasible
and determines to carry out the
project,the trail would be subject
to further environmental review
and subsequent approvals.The
potential future trail would
connect to the project-related
bicycle lane improvements on
North Tantau Avenue and Vallco
Parkway.The east-west
connection would be publicly-
accessible and would be used for
commutin and recreation.
PLAN-4:Implement Mitigation See Mitigation Measure See Mitigation Measure See Mitigation Date:
Measure CULT-1. CULT-1. CULT-1. Measure CULT-1.
Si ature:
PLAN-5:Implement Mitigation See Mitigation Measures See Mitigation Measures See Mitigation Date:
Measures PLAN-2 and PLAN-3. PLAN-2 and PLAN-3. PLAN-2 and PLAN-3. Measures PLAN-2
and PLAN-3. Si ature:
PLAN-6:Implement Mitigation See Mitigation Measures See Mitigation Measures See Mitigation Date:
Measures PLAN-2 and PLAN-3. PLAN-2 and PLAN-3. PLAN-2 and PLAN-3. Measures PLAN-2
and PLAN-3. Si ature:
A. LAND USE
LU-1:Im lement Miti ation See Miti ation Measures See Miti ation Measures See Miti ation Date:
9
pUS 2 YROJECT EIR
� R�p�R,��NG pgOGRAM
APPLE CAM
M�T�GATION TIONITORING AN
Date
�N c. Completed(
Usn Assoc►Aivis' Tim�ng Si$11i1�UT@
s E YT E M B E R onsible PaYtyt
Resp
Implementing Px�ceduTe
Monitoring P►�tion
1vleasures PLAN-1� S1�a�rQ�
easure pLAN-2,PLAN-3, 2 PLAN-3,
Mitigation M pLAN-1, PLAN- �
� PLAN-2��'j-'A��3' and CULT-1.
2 PLAN-3�
PLAN- � and CULT-1.
1 PLAN- , and CULT-1•
Ivleasures PLAN- j
and CULT-1.
B AESTHETICS a�ts.
There are r10 si nt iT10N,st�etics im �ate:
C PpPULA AND H�USING
lo ment,and H°usiri i�n acts. Prior to the issuan�
EMPL�YMENT, unity oli.tion
ulation, Em �1�-�e Comm o�dem c�l�ature:
T{iere are�z0 SI �it icant�'0 RCES �nrould �ent Department permits and
L RESOU �1}If construction Develop
p, BIOLO�ICA the nesting m�nitOr
ist shall a�cux during shall periodicaliy eriodically
A ualified biolog �rung hout pro)ect
BI��1" q rior to txee p pebruary 1{O �onstruction activities atthat �hroug
round season{ the project conf�rm
conduct surveys p lantation�Y AU�st 31), Yo�ect site and constru�non.
trans ure that p
tree remO�al, � a ropria�e nest exclus�on
activities,or construction Sponsor shall ens lace.
disturbing (2}Annual
' ities on the site to locate activs or pre_constructiono�o�e than measures are in p �om llanCe repoxts
achv either viab1e egg 2 �e City shall review the p
are condu�ted l�an�e reports to itted to
nests containi�g 14 days prior to the start of a�ua�comp� ua o£�est shall be subm
young,birds.Preconstruction surv tiTe tree p��� the adeQ �' the City n°la�er
uired for tree removal, ova].,
tree Tem confirm that than SeptembeT 30`n
are not re9 a�nvities S and
or constructioz�activities in co �r�'
ox constxuction survey rotection ear.
pruning, erioa•If any axea. a xopriate nest p of each y
outside the nest�ng P e ro}ect sponsor shall PP
onstruction wauld occux d{olAu�s{ �2�Th p measureu11Te1rnPleme�d.
� FebruarY 1 rotective Successf y
nesring season( S shall be ensuxe tha�P
31),p
xeco�s���1O�'Survey rlor measures are establ{h Shcn°e
no more than 14 days�
conducted �onstru�tion, active nests duriTO echve
runing, and that these P ulatly
to the start of p activities.
or gxound disturl?in� S shall be measures are Teg
{�1 �,onitored. February
Preconstructio aa�nt rvals�
repeated at 1`�� been initiated in the �3)No later than ,Q
construction has 15th of each
ear,the
axea aftex wh��h Suxveys can be
Z pROJECT EIR
APPLE C REppliTtNG RROGRADI
M(TIGATION DtON1TORING AND
DdtC
ComPletedl
►.s,+ nssoc�ATES. ►NC. Timing Sl$riilfllYe
sEeT�MSEe zp13 geSponsiblePaYtyl
Implementing proceduxe
Monitoring Action
1Viitiga�ion Measure
pro}ect sponsor shall su�bmit
ests �ual compliaz1Ce rep
stopped•Locations°f S or young biTds rior calendar year
viable egg for the P and CDF�N if
contai�ng and protective to the City
shall be described til the nests ved duzing
lemented un trees are remo
ineasures imp S oT young �he nesting�ason.
no longer�antain eS�uTes shall
birds.Protecti°e ment o£��early
in�lude establishm Zones(i.e.,
delineated exclus�on
un�quely identifiable
dem�rcated b as orange construchon
fe��ing�such �oun�each
fen�in�°r equ��alex�t) a qualified
determined by
nest site as taking into account
wildlife biologist� on_Site
the species of birds nesting rbanCe.In
an�their�O lus'on zones shall be a
gene�al,exc the drlp
minimUm
of 300 feet T n S for xapto=s
line of the�est�ras erines and other
and 50 feet fox p
est sites within an
Species.'I1�e a�tive n o�itored on
exclusion zone shall be m nestiing
basis thxoughOUt the r�anCe
a weekly Sl ns of distu
season ta identify $ est no longeT
or to determis oT£ oun bixds.
contains e
11
�ECT EtR
ppYLE �REfORTiN6 BROGRAM
N11TiGAT10Pl riOl�lTORiNG AnD
pate
Completedl
Tim�ng Si�atvre
LSA A5SOCIA���' INC� pi1T�I
gesponsibleAction
SEYTEMB�R
Implementiing
pYOCedure Mo�'�toxing
IVlitiga�ion
Measuxe
ex�lusion zone may
of an ect biologist if
�1e radius b {he pxo� to be
be i.n�reased y determined
the nestingbirds•
project a�t ffecting ced bY
adversely ve redu
Exclusion zoneS�st only in
the prolectbiologi Th
�nrith��W' e in
consultation Srall remain �est
pro{ection measures haVe�e�t the
effect until the youi�g endentl or t1`'e
indeP Y
�d aYe foraging �ox a�y
�est is no longex active•
vities in�olving the
project-Yelated a�U�ng the nesting
temoval of trees d bm;tted�o pate:
ort shallbe s� on�e feat�xes shall
season,a reCu ertino and CDFW pesig� into
the City of P the obseT�'ations porated Si�atitre�
ting rr►unity be in�or �t
pex yeax do��'1eme�ted to comp1Y shall The Com en�Department the building perm
�d actio�s imp velop Submittal.
onsox
ation measure. �e pxoject sp building De that the lans
vvith thls r►'��' o�sox shall Submit to the City shall verify
e ro�ect sp design orate the Submitted building�
BI�_2:Th P �ans that inco1p the b1Td`safe feari�reS CeTtification letter
orate the following h a Tev�ew P n feat�uses Mitigation Tovided
incoYp ed thro g Specific desig lti at�on include shall be P
featuxes(deVelop uidelines}in�o a�e�tified in pxioT to fina�
deSlgn g 1denrified in M g�luding
o f b i rd-safe collisions: �rleasure BIO-2. o��pan�y.
�tieasuxe B�.O� � ertain
t h e p rO�e�t to re du c e b i r d res t h a t p
thvse featu
Tan�au to indpOT°perational or
Noxth res,su��'as
Main Buildin and design featu hting)•
S� li 12
Stru� ost buildings�glass planting d f g�xes shall
From ou�slde m reflect�Ver �iese design
• often appears hlghly' earin
xe xo�u�a� rabitat a�d a
g�R
Y��� �R Y�R��������R���
A A�iD
1T�G�T��N �,ON'�oR'NG ate
M U
Cux�npletecl(
Ye
�iming
Sl�,atu
lepaz�'y�
�esporsib A�t�on
o�l�oYir&
s,���' u.Te �
�SA E�gERA2� ' entirgPr°�ed
SEe� 1�ple�
e d i�'
�,iti�a�lOn�eaS�i be�xpli�itana°it Pla�'S�
ome bird5•�Xti pz bulldin� az`�1 J t11e
al oc�up ubn,it
acti�`�e��S xe�e'��'�e t11e ior t°�iz� z SY,a11 s
a�� vi'ry and p bizds� ��, �'r e�t sP°r`S� tY�at t11e
xefle�`� �a�,tza��in�ow,re�e�n �TO� �,attestirg ebeen
g�ass£�SraU u�1iZe lectiv�t9�� �e�� a Teppz �e��xes h o ed•
pzO�ec ex�e�t Ye£1 �za�SmlttaT` des'bn' a pr
��ass����tza,aiolet ,ass S�aUbe i�s�.a�led as p
per�ent Tefle�nvi�y of�,Y`e
'tl��1O� tre enttre� �e�x`O�"�u5t
Usea£oz S svx4a ees
buiLding s�'��els neaze�t tr b��he
�� a
tl�e 1O`Nex �ollisiol�s��` e
y��exeb�T� pz��to pr°vid
�ost����a��an sa�ety 1�i�,clvde
addiri°�al Uildi��sha {ea��Staz`I
eMain�' awnin�s a ea�e
• �' fQOt_wide a�Te��,o�Y
1�� sin�i1ar f e covex��'g
�°T a � uting'�' �'
o�se 9 a e
�,�i.s�a1 �
�,rirdo
WS ar'd S�,a11 be
Tefle���O o�jOtted�laet�lass
. p'�,c a a�ray£t11a b ds`�e r�t'o�`.
eta �3
pe�"-r`e�eza�Y'rt�tY`e u p'�`e�t
atte�P�t ech�'a�al a zofile
A11�1�ovezed o��a�o S�a�les to
• shallea Toofing S izdY'I`l2ea allb
e
m r
blYa�o ll�ht"p°llve�� l�ours
1n�ez� zi� e
. xed��ea dU
LSA ASSOCIATES. IIVC. APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT E[R
SEPTEMBER 2013 MITIGATION DIONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRA111
Responsible Party/ Date
Mitigation Measure Implementing Procedure Timing Completed/
Monitoring Action
Signature
through the use of a lighting
control system.
Main Parki�Structure and North
Tantau Parking Structures
• The above-grade parking
structures shall be designed with
open-air fa�ades.No glass shall be
utilized so birds can access open
through-passages.
Cor�orate Auditorium/Cor�orate
Fitness Center
• To limit reflectivity and prevent
exterior glass from attracting
birds,the project shall utilize low-
reflectivity glass(7 percent
reflectivity,0 percent ultra-violet
transmittance).
• Interior light"pollution" shall be
reduced during evening hours
through the use of a lighting
control system.
• The Corporate Fitness Center shall
include 5-foot-wide awnings(or a
similar feature)to create"visual
noise"by covering windows and
muting image reflections.
14
pppLE CAh1P�5 Z pR��ECT E1R
Iy11TIGAT►�N ���NiTOF1NG AftD
REP�R�InG PROGRAM
Date
LSA ASSOCIATES, 1NC.
sEYTEMeER aoi3 Completed!
Responsible Party! Timing Signature
MonitorinS Action
rmplementing Procedure patie:
1Vlitigation Measuxe Prior to the issuance
The Community artment of grading, Sl�ature:
�e�xoject sponsor shall .pevelopme�t Dep demolition or
ensation of ensate the pro ect �� ermits.
BIO-3�Rep�acementico�'P re aace or comp shall ensure ehat the J o��� y p
for all protected trees Sponsor replacesl
all pzo�ected txees sha]1 be undertaken �e D�rector of
damaged or removed �ompensates the City fox all CommuriitY
in accordance with the Re�or fo the Cl� o ect es removed or ent maY
Consolidated Arborist R p during the pT J protected tre Developm
us 2 Project and C�tY �onstrucnon period ed during the
,p,pple Camp xior to damag allow an extension
uirements,p construction period and sha11
T/lunicipal Code req gerierally in conformance of time,subject to
with attached Exhibit EA-2a verify that suitable the
the initiation of canstruction. and in accorda�Ce with the lantation sites have
Recomme�dations n°ted within the trans xecommendations of
City of Cupertino Muruclpal beenpdentified. the City's consulting
Review o£the C�n�e Campu 2 orist Cha ter 14.18• T�e
Report for the App Code P Arborist and
project, as mo�ified by{he project sponsor shall ensure a ropriate
ro ect results in a Substitutions to the trees
that the p ) identified in Exhibit EA-2a f nancial surery
Adjustment1e C o n s o l d ated Arborist e t in c r e a s e o f at least 1,70� a b e a l l o wed subject to the
R e v i e w o f t l � r n y (s u c h a s a bond or a
er EIR Plan Revision an d A {rees on the pro)ec t si t e, S
Report p review of the City' �,etter of cre dit)fo r
which shall consist of native Consulting Arborist and
Review o�the Trees R,e C�p d 2 or ro r�ate �e pirector of the work xemai�ng'
Tra�,sp l a n t a t t h e A p p a n d c l imate app P a p p r oval b Y en t.
lemented to t he Species• Community Developm
�'roject shal]be imp
satisfactio en D TeCto .Pro e ted trees
Devel,op�
that are damaged or removed during
construction ox roadway
impxovements shalens t on}acco�rding
rep1acement(comp
to the City's tree pxotection ordina�Ce.
I-�owever,replacee C tt fo P o e�cted
trees subject to th Y
Tree OrdinancT meln b o f Chapter�l'�'1S
,,vith the req�i 15
of the Protected Tree Ordinance.T x e e s
CT E1R
ARPLE �REppRT►NG YROGRA�7
MITIGATION DtOP1tTORING AN�
D ate
Completedl
T�ming �1�,atuxe
pssocinTes, �N�� Responsiblerartyl
►,S" z°'' Action
S E Y T E M 8 E R �n1tOTlri$
Implementing PrO�eduYe M
Iviitigation NieasuTe
tified as being
e been iden Sha��be �ate:
that hav txa�sp�antatio� Txee p�tixne
suitable f o= ��e�,vith th b �lte Extensions �ed b�`
�n accord ToVed Y munity may be gran S��atuxe�
Yelo�ated� e Com irectox of
t Sched1zle aPP t
Txansp�an Develo men�Dlrectox. or Sh
1 en
�uni L1RCES �e pro}ect SP°� tionall �e�'elop ew�d aPp Ve CoDmuni�Y •f
C�n' RES� �1� barn reloca on of t i
CUL'TURAL e shall xevl relocah �evelopmen
E. elo�ation):�' rePaTe a on-or of£- for the rogTess
Cj,JLT-1a(�`Site R plan for eithex a� lans an�shall �an�ial p
shallbe relocated �at adheres p lf the subs on�e
gar� Glende��g Barn ade
Glendennir�g two sites Si�e relo�ation vetifY that� is being m
folloWi�� ject y of tk1e S ecifically on_5ite}�11e tio��'d
{o ane of the us 2 PYO to the Secxetax foT�he p teloca
the APl�le Camp dards ba�is relocated e visible cial s�rery
within �he approval of the Interior s Stan StructuTe i'`�OUldb fina�' bond ox
ect to ent of Historic ht-of-�'�'aY�°r �SUCh as a
site,subj Treatm a ublic�g of�-
to the northeast of south of erties. clude fiOm�e b�is Telocated line of credit)is
City'1) ess Centet, Pxop (if
CotpoTate Fim or 2}at the ,T.he plan shall also in Te S character- xovided.
estead R�ad a�d pToposed Site)the stxuctu ouldbe p
East Hom terminarion of a design eleme�ts`'� of-
proposed eastern e for tl�e defiz�g ublic tight-
e Aven�er neax`� location laque. from a P lendenxu�K
exidg ot be emoTatiVe P visible viewpoi�t. J�the G
Pxun �y,e barn shall n comm way or public �,t�,at off-
Ha,T,ptons• otential 2�If�o�-site relocation ls S�,all vexi Ba�is located
to implemented,the Plans C��,�e City
to the secon P b Apple' o f�he baxn 11as Site,relocation
xelocated to the �d fundin�
site identified Y �e elocan°�
{ near�e x n,ented in timin�
Telocation Cen�Tal P��'r Sha�.l adhexe ldenri£ied eT the
est of Teloca�ion���e easure been docu with the would be p
�he w
the Topexey line of the
sou��i�^'estern P S Site is una a�table in Mirigation NL ect accoxdance o f Ml��ation terms in the
T11e prO) provisions t
pro�ect site.Tku CULT-1a. visual CU1.T-1. Developmen
because it woul �o be IVleasure Agreement.
to the City for the barn 5ponsor sl�all prepar�that
allo� Simulations that sho
difficult to ub��c xight-of-waY'
trat any ,would be
visible frome� Shall enSUTe tY►e bar rially visible£xom� 16
�e lead ag to mirigate ox SUbstan
ted measuxes �hariges to h�-of-Wa '
adop dverse ublic zi
avoid sign1f��aTetfull enforceable
the resouYCe
E�R
PQL� C REy���,NG YROG¢An,
A Ar1D
�T�GAT��N�,oN+�oR`�G ate
M C�Pletedl
Ye
Sl�,ato
���in�
sib�epa�Yf
Res�on p,�tior
Monitoyin�
ASSOCR ZQ 3,�N�• xo�edure
��'e�`E M8� In�41en�en�ir&�
o�atipz,is
easuYe S�te zel
Mltigatl°�M �31 ZE a�'e��ed the pl��s
implesY*reTe to the en��ed
ez�lti�ordl�easuzes•�`e s1�a11 ad o�C�terla id ze
t11r°��h X� or at11ez �l a�p1y to ze�o�ati ario�Meas ect
en,�ents, �ox,s s�` in��tl�' �e FTO� aisua�
agl�owing stip Site zelo�atiori�definin� C�S'`�,lbshall pxepaQN,that
4treba�S� tivi���raTaCte of tY`ebaTr` s���s�tions tl1at Sl�
, '�e£OU� ra1 ele�entsvisib�e fzom Si�nUla �ou�dbe e fror�a
crlte�� ��t�a�ly eX d.�e tbe'°as�,�la11y°1$1�1 ox
az allbe s�bs o��ay,l� Substan h�Qf,vvay
Sa pabll�z��'o�City Staf£�1 xd and publl�v$v�poir��• Spz Sha11
dls�retio�` bazn;Z�b°a �,,�1z�a°`NS� �ub1i� o e��spor` ct�ie,
s�tie)s�as�n�t�iz��1'�oo��ne. �41'f�'e a a�a�i�i��'s a�d a
b�tpo S�b�e>�a o�3� e G,e�a a e i z��i r�ov��a�l po c ax�rl t e c t
' �e�skiaU nclud capbe���ex et� a�aovexseetl�ebazz�
B��oT land t�? �o�t°£°p t elo�ation• c p�r`S°x s�aU
c'�'�S xo}e t S Stoxic
�o s'i e s r allb�Saf al S l�ist�lc �51�`ea aUalifie d e�t tre
SPa� the axe tetal� ��to d°�� �ftpz�
xe�exC;�xa�zoots•BaTn shall�e ard�lte n o��y'e ba e�ey�'
agxi de�,ing ed Stiv�tvse� zelo�ati e��S�te to tr
Gl Uali'ti eziex'ce its�uxx �'1
�Y`e at dby a Q ,�,,itr eXp
xe1o� �ompany Ui�di��s' site.
movi�$his�or'�b Glendez�r'n�
��V atior`�{tY�e See�by a �e
����C a11be°Ve cY���ec
t
• 1 enSUZe��at�re bazn
gaxz'S� liistOr'�a�aT
quali�ied al aractez
crlte�t S� rifi�az`�c1,
w
ar talns l�s fea res at�ts ne
defl�'1z�
E�R
PQt'E C REyURT�NG @ROGRA��
p NO
N ���N'�o�tNr, A
M�T1G A�,O t1atC
Cov�pleteal
e
,.��minb S1�at�T
Yaz�y�
�esp°"s'b�e p,ction
�orlto�iri�
TES�'"c� duxe
�Sp��MBER 2�j3 �ertingPr°�e
sEe iri�l'le
N�easuxe
�itiga{1On
its�O�' t le,
��lu�in� � �1�,s`I
�o�atior� Stx���s � tozia�Srall
xopox�o�r ls ,�ek,is �ezttiz��
p d re�ate�la e�or d°� its
bxesp��siof tllebaznExi�e�Slte.
zel�Cez,�,lvstOx�c sra�1��`���de
poc��entat£a Teppzr t11ati
IodUCti.oz` otogxapllic oye and a
pncludes P�`�ior°f tY�e�' ba�t1�at
docu�'e�conteXt�O��e$
�St�xlbes�'he xes� alY'istorY' Sra11
des��� ar�e inlO� �e�ta��On
Sl�ifi� o�t1�is do�'' es ai'd
Copies �d�o�ocal li��es �d
be��f ez Stozi��S�� tl��`'est
�ocal� to theN°z o�,o�'a
SubY'c'i�ted Centez a�"S
�oxx�,at�Qn
eYS��' �re�ntexlOx�o£
S�ate���v
�etaxy of �zeat�,ex�
. ��ie Se foY t11e datdsl
S�andaYds ez�les l5tan �at lts l$
zl��,r°p to�Y`eba
xna lbe apPl�e,�he Stana�Xe t�e�ts
ne�1o�anao z p°SS�ble
co��i5�"°�� rape�tles� tioz��
{oT h15�ori�p �ehab1lita o
u�ti �'.
tio�� d Te�oristiz �f the
Sex�a
pestoxation,o tY�e natUZe
e endin
�
T glR
pPPLE D REppRTtNGOeR�GRAht
M1T{GATI�N ht0
KIT�R�NG AN
D�te
Completedl
Tim�n� Sl�a{�re
�Es. �N c• onsible Patty[
s�eTEMg�A��o�s j�CSp A��pri
Implementin$P=°�eduxe
Manitoxi�g
�riitigatiori
Nieasuxe
ba�S uSe at its new
locatioz'and
dition,o�'e°r m�re
its current cox� ents shall apply.
of these tzea� rovide a
. The aPpl��ant shall P andloT other
plaque,readeT bOard
to explain tY'e
educatio�al too S eba�on
nl te a'�'e pl q e shall
historic s��
the l�xO�e�t si Seal,n�e�f the
include tY'e C��Y built,a
Tesource�date it was
wzitten
deSCrip��a S a�be�laced in
photogxaph� the public can
a location wY'exe
ation,nOt
�eN,the inf�he barn•
necessarily on
pR e
pff-site Relocati°T lo ated
CULT-1b� -Baxn sk'allbe �,vithin
Glendenning a neW site
off the prO1e��Siee t� the appr�val of
subject to enSUxe
�upertinoj y shall
C��'• e lead a$en�
the �
adopted measuTes to Verse
that any avoid signlficant ad
Ynitigate ox Urce are fu�lY 19
changes to the re$� eTmlt
enfozCeable thxougr p or other
reemen{S� ulat��n5
condihons,ag sti
measures.The followin
� E�R
C
AYY�E D R YORT1NG�Y�EOGR�F1
AN
M�T�G�T,oN NoNi�oR1NG
�Date
ColnFletedl
Ye
�i�ir& glgnatu
�e pattyl
onsib A n
.�E s,�"`. �oritorinK �tio
tis^ �'s�sER���} p2a�ed�T�
S�YT E"' le�entinK
Iznp
MeasuYe
MitigatlOn
l S Telo�atio�`�
to�Y'e baTn de��ng
s1�a11 aPpl� fpz the Glen aCe
' ���sha�lt�'��u�`�a�be�On`'eT ex�
Bndlpz las`d�Y`ae am��t o��e eT�
to SU�h u llb SUfficient toTl�l�x�l
Spa�e sl� ea S histon es of�e new
en�e the az TopTlate us cat�onal uses
zpOt�o pd in�l1zde eCl�,.Pub�l�
s��'� �edb�tr� itted ai`d is
dete� uldbe Yexm uised to
a��ess c� ed,b'at is�'°t xe ouT�e.
e�c�u�ag a�ts ta tY`e Y�� e
erty,th
Tedu�e imF Xl�ate�xop
e of t eba�n
. I�loo�d��haTactes-d
ts
foll �n�xa�e�eme� visible fz°ra
ax�x`�{ec tantially the
shallbe S��1t-of.way°xdi�Y,s aze
a pub�i� g rsou�
d�or�ts S`x a .�blic
baX�an esslble) P
Pub�'�lylacc
er t1�e dis�retion of
viewp°���,�' e���ale of batn�d�g
S'd'n and 31
Staf�:1)s��
CitY d ba�ten 20
b°a a�s,�f pp55'ble),
e Shall be
roofliz` ' ingBaTn cture.
'I�e Glende a�ualified St eTi
en�e
• �elo�atedb� any�`'ith eXp
c.�a�,�n�g��mari�buil�' s.
m�
E�R
RQLE C R�4���`NG eRQGAhP,
P AND
�qlG����N n,oN,�OR`NG atie
m p
� leted)
� in� Cslg atUxQ
��
lepaz�'9,
ReS�Qrsib A��lon
MonitoYir�
TES�``��� duxe
us Q.��M�������3 e�ena��'�z���
5�' 1���
�easure
Mitiga{1On
G�e�de�ix��
��£the b`1 a e
�e1oc Shallbe°`ieXSee cr��.ec�.`�`
• ax at��e bazn
p,ax�` �Stoxi�al tY�
ualified 11 ensuTe arac�ez,
a lte��S11a �an�ch
cY'+ �ifi va
a� taiz�s�ts Sl at itis ne
ze 4ean.'zes fOrz�`� �e,
ae�iri�z'g �ludirg 1�' laz�,sty
lo�atiot�,l� S��tuTe,poT�a�Sra11
ToporttoY`' ,�ieY`is� entiz�g
a�d�a�ox�ab�e£�z d���' on''ts
be xes� Slof theba��Tlts zie�Slte�
xelO�a���5tox*�Sl�al���,cluae des
cvzxe�e�takio�`S e ort that 1��1U �e
Do�u of a r p �a�lon of
p�od��tio h,�do�rn; ntex�f°x
Y,otogzap ristazi�a c� e
ma�ea nahat des��a�e n�O�al
eU ,fl
t�soUr�e s si�'s pg�,is ��{ e��.o
e er
�St��e ta iO�S aa�o a1�us�'��eal
ao�a libXaX�ea�bc�itted Certet a� 21
cie'�es�az' pzmatlon
S� t1lvJes�Inf i�ers'ty ,
So�o�,as�ate of�helY+tezie�s f
�o
�ese�tetafar the�Xea� �dardsl
� Sta�daxds Tope�{les�S eb at its
ax�
x�stpzlc a p�led{�t tandazds
sl�elwbo�p an��'e S
n
E�T Ein
ppPLE C REpUpRTIPiG PROGRAM1S
1y11T1GAT10N D70NtTORtNG AND
�ate
Completedl
Timing Si�'ature
t N c• Itesponsible r arty t
4SA pSSBERA2pE3•
SEY E�
onitoring A�tioY►
m lementing,Pr°ceduxe M
1 p
Measuxe
�tlitigation
ossible treatments
consist of four pexties:
for histoxic pTOehabLl��aeion,
pzesexvation, a xeconstruct�on•
tl�e natuYe°f t�'e
restoration,ax�
Depending,�n loeation and
�S use at its new e ox�ore
barn dition,on
its current con Shall aPP Y.
treatments
of theSe �5h�1 pxovide a
�e appllcar� a�d�or other
• plaque�readex b�ard lal�the
tools�Q eXp
educational can�e o f the batn,
historic signifi
� on
�,oth o�tk'e o£e si�e plaq es Sha�e
the PTO�e�t sit �ame of th
tk�e City sea1,
in��u�e date it was built,a pate:
�d photo- issua��e
xeSoutce� rion, a prioz to the
tivxitten descxip laced in Te:
d Shall be p view its,the of gtading and S��atu
grapl,,�' the public can �ox grading perm its,
where ox Shall t�� public�N°r� building permo�ect
locatian ation,n��necessarily Qn �e p�oject spons pixector of that the conttact a�d duxing�
the inf oxm {1) Plan�� shall Vexify truction
t Srall Submit aM°nitoxing a�e inMitigation ded cons
the baYn. lican inclu
a.The Px°�e�{�pp ist tQ the City prior to d langu �LT_2b is activities•
CjJtiT-2 ' ax�haeolog roun Measure
ualified d dlsturbing undeTtakiny g in all apPxOpriate
retain a q �ect groun � �ctivities- documen�s fox
monitor prO xoject ground" distuxb'ng ction
Px�Ox tO p archaeolog'st constru 2�
activities. the rO e�t�
activities,the Pl�foY U on dis�QVe�'°f
xbing a Monitoring Shall �2� p o ical resources in
ciistu p�an aeol
sha11 pxePaxe e Monitoring arcY►
the pTO)ect."�' of historical
in�luae:(1)
a review
T ��R
AQQ�E D R eOR�,NGpYROGRpAi
AN
MTT�������A1�N���R�N�
pate
CoinFletedl
ing glgnatuxe
'tim
onsible paT�,
T E S•`N`� Resp A�tior
s E Q T E M B E RAZ o'3 �O�,l�O��g
le�ertingPYO�eduxe �e
txn� etm�ts,
of an aTChae' �Z��ox bu'1d1z►�p
Mingation Measure omm���'De�elop�`ent t
the Presen�e the pzoje�t C all�erify tl�a
o�itor� sl�
tories� olag,��al m pepartment ua$e in
rotogTa�hS'$Oilin°eaenti�y spo�sor shallhalt ��e contiactlan�, C�LT-2b
oxts to i a�tivities a�o��easure rlate
maps,P cal IeP uxfa�e �anstru�t'on t1�e axea �r1itig z�p
�d ge�te��S eze Subs a
25 feet°f clvded�`�11 P tS for
itl�in is in et�
cation `^'�i r an �,v ate beirg do�um
those�O es ma`1°�c� and�2� w�le finds �onstruction
�al fea�T Siti�ity; assessedby a qualified
hlstori istoxic sen es tl�e If dep°sits a�� tl�e PxO�ect
areas of�reY' t des�zib
Plan tha that ist• ��ew�he
very roceduxes azchaeo1Og to be of all xe
a�is�� and p and e City s�` adequa�Y
S e�fl�metl�odtsh�event�'at detexmi�'ed rifican�e (3)Th plan for
P be used in �S axe ide�tified• histori�al s�g�tot£easible, Monitoringthat Niitigation
Will �eologi�al dep�ltors shallb� a�oidan�e�efforts srallbe and�erify CUL�-2a and �,e
axch lcal m°n ction itiy,
p,zcha�o1Og to}.ialt constx�a a dis�o�ezy u� ati�en in a�M danCe �LT�2b aye f��o��uct n
eTed dertak n easuT ltu
emPo`'� �tigariO t that the zal
ehe 10 eaa°ha olaglcal �,aith M eve� es a cu
activities ati Ossibl �t the Tesour�e
CU1,,T-2a• �onkractor ident'�e�o�_
to review P to pxote ated. onsox sha11 uT�e duzing
arebeing e�alu tbe e project sp zeso eziod.
�,aterial az'd
s til,in Th archae- ctioz`p
y�,hile�.he�T`d �3� a qualified stru
�ontinue un
shall �ultuzal �otify tox ar`d tk'e
�Ilonitoxing r ud�ment, o�og��a��on� are en�O�n
arcraeo1Ogtst s� t likely to be osits
z�o City,if dep
uTCes axe tered duxinY,grO'�nd en a
xQSO a��,vities(N'h
en��unteTed• xbi��
or historical dis� irially
lsto is n �ir
Tl'� �
O� Teh l�.OY
If deP°S'ts p �texials axe Yno�` halt
pxese�t�a�d 25 4eet
aeolog,��al m e��activities, ,�,Tithi� Su�h
ax�h ed dUtin�'PTO� the constru��On durin�
untex �5 feet o� Of the deposits 23
co til t�'e
e�` �,,it1v� cted u�' its aTe
all v�tOxk Srallbe redl the flnds, e If de��s be of
xopTiater tirn ' ined tO d
dlsCOpe lp ist assessees as ap� e determ al S� nifican�e a�
arcl�ae° g s�ox th �,ist�r
con�ults With age�' e�danon
and�`akes ze�om�' .If
dls�ove
txeatment of
the
��R
p4�� �R ��R�� ��yRQGRADI
p �y D
�n`on`��R��yG A
M�T�G��`o rl a�C
V
1gtC
�ptllp
Ye
Sigrata
Ti�ing
�,a�'�
�esponsible A��lor
Monito�n�
�N�• duze
�,5�' ASMB�Rp,�o 3' pz�ce
e
entir�i
S�,e"� ��p1e
eas�xe ot�easibler
is n be
MitigatilO�� a`��la a��'�oxt e��-oxts Sr dance
axcl�aeo���'lCa1 ��aertaken'n a�Measuie
of tl1e t�e Mlri�ati°n
avo�dan�e ���eas�ble� SraUbe .�,'itl� 2a.
dep��e 1$i��a�p�lig�bi�itiY f°� o �U���
ax��`a �eiz e �Stet f
e�alu����e Ca�if�����d�p���ts
z
lis��o lCalgeso'�����ation 1 e e�iglble,
aX �Qt e1i�b��e aeposits aos�ts S�,all e
SaTy. t��e dep �nclti'd
aapezs?ea�ed•�tlgatl��o°$��al
be�,it�g af tl�e arcl1aN,1�Y�a daYa
�ayatioz� pzd�ce Guldeliz�es
ex �in a�� CEQP` tandazd
dep°sl p�an�See 311C1'!and and
Yecove�15126.4�.b�� metl�od5 �a1
Se����n �cal field a teck�
ax��`ae�,�� lab°za�o�'�,ae�logical
PrO�edu�of �OVesedz�T axep�xtan
analyses Te azatio o� �iz1&S' d
�,a�erlals;�re�e�hod c�a olfl$ica�Slte
deta111t�& e az
of tl� atetia�s�a�'d
S��i�ica�ce of zchaeO��glcal
d asso��ated da�a �4
��esslonix�g d a te��i�a1�o�£acility.
a �t��a�$a� z�at a�u�a
e��°ez�z�p� e assess�,ent,
o��on�pletl�s�k'�pxeetY��ds a�d
�e aXC1�ae°�og�ent t11e�'�e xe �xt
t11 aocu ex�t.
zep°r�t� e assessm
Tes�lts of
t�n
E�R
AQeLE OpA�q�OR,�l1�G QRQG�A��
AN
�,�1GAT��N��ON����1NG ate
�
Com�21e�'edl
Slgrature
.��,n'in�
leYa��
,�esponsib A��lon
TES.���� ���1{pY111g
��A �g�$ER����� Yx����uzC
S�e��M 1nll�lementin�
Measuze
rrSitigation
d�o t�e�1���
srallbe S`'bmd tlie N°xtrwo�a Sta�e
C�peztiz�o�`Ce��ex at 5pz` n of t11e
Lnf�r�''atiori o��onlpletio
u
�esouz�e�SSess�e��, . a1 dep°S��s
T aeo�O�� t
L�_2b'•If ar��durin��Ta�eC an
C e e��ouxttered txU�tlO�wre t resent�
aT uz fa,co�O�S on itoract�°�es�ritY�i11
abhaeO glCal�xb�ng d a
d dis �ed axt
a11 g�°�S allbe Xedoe�t�o��actea tO
25£ d archaeOl Y� Su�t`N�tk�
q SS S tl�e Sl�atian,�pz� d�ake
To�riater an ea�ex�t°�
a cles aS app foT�re tr ll�a�t
agen �ex�dati°� ect��p
�
x��e a1S�o�etYlt�o��a tor�Tea foY e
srall inf°rm tY,e�rO�ect a e Cl�,srall
Sez�Sltivlt�3�f d p�s'ts•a Te�ti�ehas
�aeolo$lcal ollow'ng te
at �tire f the xopxla
�er�fy t1�a ded� apF 25
b o��aC�ao�u�rez�ts- 1
c �S�orlca
„If�re�'LStolCa�°aeposits area�ti�ities,
azcl�aeQe°a duziz�g pe t o tre a
allwoTk witl�iY`�e�ed�zec�,ea a�d
dls�a�e
shall
T EIK
�QptiE G g�Y�ATING YROGRAhi
lvi1TIGATION b10NITORtNG AND
p ate
Cam�letedl
Ti�►ln$ Si�natuxe
�N c. onsible I'attyl
oc�nT�s� Resp
S�EQTEMBER 2�13 p,ction
re Nionitorin�
ImPlementing rYO�edu
�rlitigation
Measuze
ist��n�a�ted to
ed ax�haeOlog C���lt with
Qualifi make
assess the situatiOxi,
Topriate,and
agen��e�naa ons Tegarding�'e
xec disco�erY.
�xeatment o�the ot collect or
ersonnel shall n ateTials ox
Pro}ect p ical�
move�Y��seand associated
ical resour�es
human AT�haeolog
materials� akea"Stone�ools(e•�•!
can ir��lude fl �hoppers�or
projecrile points,kr'1°es,
basalt,or quartz�te
obsidian,�ext' e tools;
akin$debxi ea So 1��.e.,
��dden
toolm darlcen
�l�rally reat-affected
soil often con�aining Shellfish
and�'axcoal� �l�ral
xock,ash al boneS,and
remains�faun milling eau'p
mateTials);and Stone-
�,ortars,pestles,
n'en��e�$� preh�storic
handstonesical sites often�ontaix�
ax�haeolog „ �ate:
hu�an remains.
prior to the issuan�
aeological erm �he xadin ,bu'ldin ,
to arch its, of
p,dVeTSe effects C1�For$zading 1�
all be treated in �easure ,�blic W°r� 26
deposits Sh With Niitigation pixector°f P
accordan�e Upon disco�erY of
CUj-T"2a' aleontolog��al aleontolo ical xesouxces
CULT'3:Shauld p �tered durin
xeSOUTCes be
en�o
MpUS Z 4 G P��GRAh
App�NDCA�EYpRTiI`�
ORIN
G A
M1T[GATtON n10N�T
��te
Co�pleted�
TiYnin� Si�`
atuie
o�,sib1e Paxty� re;
o c�n�kS•'N�� gesp A�tlon Sl�ahx
LSA ASMBER 2013 Monitoririg oT occupan�Y
S E eT E Pxo�eduze duTing
ImPlementin& �tha�the�OntTact peim1ts and tru�nOn
shall vete in�itiganon roject cons
ation easure ded p
itig lan�a CULT_2b clu activities.
M� M t�e pro�e�t SP°ori a�t v��.es l�eas ge • te ls ln
truct TQpria
�e�onstru�tion halt��2 feeti�f tY'e area i�rist��on aocum�n{S f�T
To�ect subsuxfa d alsturbing witlun u�,lified
�' all gxO� all be and notify a q �d the Cit}'• the pTO�ect•
activit�es, 25 fee�Sh �ned e Com�u��� t
�,,jithin aleontoloy,lst C,��.� en
activities ualified tre p£deposits axe deteTm en�4e�axtm
and a Q to assess d Developn' �ontTact
red1Tected �onta�ted �obe Sl�ficant� verify tl�a�the
p�eontologist �„�ith agenGleS as ot feasible� shall Mitig�{ion
�onsult avoidan�e ls n allbe language'ULT_3 is in�luded
ts sh
Sl�a�o�, tef a���'a1ce atment of �rio�,ef£ox dan�e C
appzopzia tions for the tre mitig in a��ox �tleasure x�ate
menda �obe undextake ationMeasuxe in all aF�xO� erits f°x
recom If found docu�'
vines �nrithNiitig �o�t�ctian
the discoVery•d ro�ect acn ect. t
fican�,�' p �eo�tolog��al CULT-3• the�rO� vexify th�
si� th�P �e City shall CUL.�_3
cax�x�°t avoid effects t� (3)
adverse llbe ationMeasure at
TeSourcesr urces sha Mltig i�the e°ent th
tological reso a ln�lUde tractor
paleon ation�`he fossil �S folloWed Ctio�con
�,itigated•M'�'�' �he constn� tolog�cal
recording al sis, aleon
and a� `I a
monitoring, ldentifies p
data reCOVe T y uzces duri n g the
a a�cessioning the
1ocali.ty� �onstx�ct�°n Period'
final Tel�ort,an �teclvv
cal xeppzt to
fossil matexial a�` oSlto�.y• also
tological reP
a paleon utreacY''z'ay
public edu�ational o Co�pletion�f
be appropriate.�p°�oxt d°�Ui"entir�$
the assessxne�'t,
findings�and xepaxed
�ethods� shallbe p
mendations of
xeC�m itted�o tYLe Cir}' 2't
and Subm and(if
o for review,
Cupextix� �cal rna�exials are
�a��ontolog tolog�cal
Tecovered�a Paleonthe Vexsit of
Such�s
U�
xe °Slt° '
JEC`T �IR
TING RB�GRA��
App�g CAhiYUS
G AND REYOR
M1-('IGAT/ON htON►TO
LiIN
pate
Co�pleted!
►N c. Timing Si�ature
sr�e�MsER��i3� OIlS1b�e�8T�I
ReSp pction
Impleme�ting
pYOCedure 1VlonitorinY
1VSitig
ation NieasuTe
useum of Paleontology•
Califom�a M
lican�SY'all inf orm its
.��project app of the
S of the sensitiviical
contTactor() a�eontolog
pro}ect axea for p shall veTify that
resouTCes.`�e City
dixective has been
�he fo��O�''�ln�e appropriate contract
included u�
doc�ments:
the construcnon
„�e sabbe sens tive for
site m y
paleontologlcal resources.I
ical resoUrces are
p
aleontolog ro ect
en�oun{ered during P 1
construction a�'d a
Subsur�ace Site,a11
paleontologist is not on-
ground"
distuxbing a�tivities withiz�
2�feet shall be redireis d n acted to
qualified pa�eonto�Og
consult with
assess the situahonTiate,and make
agencies as appTOp treatment
xecom�`endations for the
Project personnel
of the diseovery• moVe anY
shall no��ollect oT
paleontological materials.
28
Paleontologi�al xesources a�a uch
�a�i�als,
fossi� la�ts�
T ElR
ApPLE�C R�yO[ITiNC'aY�'�GRAM
TOR�NG ��
(vIITIGAT�QN niONl
pate
Completedl
'Timin& Signatuxe
ciATES, iN�� es onsiblerartyl
s�eT��BE� z°" R P A�tion
Implemerting
pYOCeduYe NionitorinY
�riitigation
Measure
ce of past life as
fossil evidenarine Sedl�'ents'x`ay
txace as
tracks.A�cient m
tain inVeTtebrate feT shellsch
con and�Yst
snails,clam and vextebrate
SpangeSr and protozoa; a�d Sea
as fisl�,�n'�'ale, am�'als
fossils Su�'vextebxate lax�d mo�h Date:
lionboneS• es of mar'c' to the issuan�e
�ay lnclude b�n pxior
,hor$e'and its,the building, S1�a'ture�
�amel sabex tooth cat also of gxading,
tologl�al resources 1�For grading pe works an�y
paleon etTif�ed un,a�, � ublic �ract or occup d during
b�s°�� t imprints,P pixectox of P e�on permits an
in�lu�e Pl.a� Upon disco�eTO,°�t Sponsor f that th ction
d anima�txacks:' the p Shall�e e i Mingation ro}ect constru
Waod,�If hu�'an Tema��s are the xemains ction
txuction, alt constru 5 fee lang�ag T-2b is ln�luded activities-
�j,T- ; s CU
du�ing con shall h t af
Iv1easuxe
texed Ml���,ation within 2 �riate
encoun ent a�tivities a ualified in all apprO ents fOr
the axea,notify a the City, �rion do�um
pTp�e�t Srall i�'pl a aTC�aeological St an constru
2 t d tTeat any aeo�ogi
M,e a s ure CU�-'T a xch 5 in ro�ect.
to i de�t l�'anbe presen t and�'eat xem a� t�e p Q Communi t Y
m o nitoring) t h a t ma y �i t h Ca1ifornia �2�T h t DeP a Y t ment
human remains a�cor dan�a Safety Co de �}evelopn1-eT` trac t
an remains Health a� �erify that the con
any�`u�' ect gtound- �05Q.5. shall lti ation
��,additi°n, Section lang�age ln MT 4 is in�luded
untered during PrO� e trea�ed in CUL "
en�o shall b ealth and M�asure
rbing a�tivities ��all apPxOpxiate
distu �,,ritl�California H ect do�ulnentis f°r
The px°�
accoTdan�e �050.5. constru�ttOn
CQde Section �e pxo�ect.
Sa�ety its contra�tor(S tl�at
all infoTm ect site fQr Srall vexif 29
a�plican{sh of the pr°j C3�.�e Cit
of the sensitiviry �e City shall verif}'
Yemains. as been
human dixecti�e r
t�,at the following x��Tiate co�'�Ta�t
in�lu�ed in the�PP
gCT EIR
AYYLND REPORTING PROGRAAI
MITtGATLON AtONtTO►i�nG A
pate
Completedl
T�s. �N c. Timing Signatuxe
LSA E�BERA2013 �a'��/
s E pT ReSponsible
�mplementing ProceduTe
Monitorin$Action
1�Ieasuxe CULT-4
ation Measure MirigatiOn Ve�t that
ntlitig ed�,n the e
is follow �o�tractor
the constru�tion ains
identifies human rem
do�inents: ction
„ an remains are uncoveYed�
during�'e constru
If hum the discovery period.
within 25 feet of
work the County
sha�l be redirected an ediately•At the
Coroner norified im�' is�shal�be
same time'�`archaeolog on Site
contacted-lf°ne's not aana do sult
_to assess the situation project
encies as appropriate•
�ith ag collect or�OV��'y
pexsonr►el shall not
huma�remains or associate ains are of
n,aterials.If the hum�'rem
inerican origin,{he Coroner
Native A �he Native AmeTican
n,ust noti£y mission within 24 hours
Heritage Com at�ve
tification.�e N
of this iden e Com�►ission�^'�ll
Arnerican Heritag
a Na�ive A�erican Most
identify ect the site
pescendant to insp �ate:
Likely dations for the
pjior to issuance°
�d provide recommhe remains and �uilding,°T Si�ature:
proper treatment°f e Communiry gradiz�g, exmits.
rave oods." g4ILS onsor shall �1)Th ment Del'artment occupancy P
ICITY,AND
associated Gy�SEISM �1y.�e pro}ect sp pevelop e�,t of Public
F GEOL� of any i�a design-level �d Departm
Prior to the issuance Subm ort,
GEO-1� or building eoYecllnical rep W orks
ecific gxading ical g a licensed the final desi n"
site-sp a design-level geotechn prepared by S�,all review 30
ermits, and rofessional containin
p ared
report shall be pr Cit of Cu extino
submitted to tl'e
pPPLE CAb/PU5 2 PRO7ECT E1R
MiTIGATION r�ON�TORING AND
REP�RT�NG eROGRAM
pate
,N�. ComPletedl
LSA ASSOC�A2013
5 E F T E M B E R Tlllllll�`j g�g�atuxe
Responsible Party�
I�plementing Procedure
Monitoring p'�tion
1Vlitigation Measute
level$eotecY►ni�a ure that
recommendations fox ��Vestigation to e� design
techxuQues all recommendations,
Building De�artmen{fOT Teview and Specific building and specifications set
xo xiate for minimizing �r�{eria,
appxoval and in accoxdan�e tY ct�ral aPp p seismic events ort are
standards. damage from forth in the rep
adopted CitiY to the 2010 ansive and adequate t°reduce the risk
deS��s sha11 adhere �C�or the and exp seismic
Code( corrosive soils. associated with
Californla Building �ode,as adopted endations in Shaking haxards�d
appropriate building Examp�eS°£ (2)All recom� eX ansive and corxosive soils.
of CupeTtino. the report shall be p y that
�y the C�{Y lans for 2 �e Ci�,shall verif
the kinds of ineasures that wou�d in�orporated into p �ent t ) mendations of the
be used to mee{tl'ese pecific deve�.op the xecom ical
tYpically ile-suppor�ed the s ]evel geO�echn
roject(s}addressed in the design-
reqUirements include e_stxessed p ��estigation are
use of p port.
foundatio�s, ent, re
aterials,slab reinforcem in�orp��a�ed into al
concrete m drainage app]icable prolect plans•
compaction specifications,
requirements,use of CO fac oT°�n,�e
and appropriate safery
xe}?ort shall identi�Y SPecific building
techniques appropriate for
t�ninimizing
d�age from se�smic
events,including liquefaction an
lateral spreading•In addition,the
following Tequ�rement for the
�eotecYulical and soils repoT�Shall be
met:
, �e seismic hazar do{c�,�'�al
presented i�.�the g
report shall include an evaluation
of liquefactionhazards�a shall 31
Calabazas Creek area,
confoxm to the California Division
E�n
A�����RE�Q�TING YR��RA4t
AN
M,�`GA�I�N 4�t�N����`NG aEe
�
ComPletedl
xe
Sl�,atu
�iminY,
le�'azty�
�esp��'Slb Action
S,�"�� Mori1toxinY�
s�YZgMB�R�� � �entl�g�����d���
1m41e
N1eas°ze
Mitig�t'Ox�
az�d�'ye�l�g� ez�ted i�tx'e
ofMlY'es datiors pxes � ar`d
o�mezti fpz�V a�uari �
TGuldelizles �eismi�xaZazds in
Mltigating
e�xo�e�t shal
Califo�`la'
w �` ze`"
�ox
. �esi�'z e alua�.ion°f�"1 e�v,,ith tk'e
in�lude s,az'd faste collateral
��nlsring itiing ts
intienr es o b�ai��°or��isllin�,s
i x y u x� re Cou�e of avio l e'�`t
fYarc�fallir�g
d�Ying t e�ent
5eism1� cxiteria�d iz�the
. p,ll design ons Set��sth cal zep°�
t
Specifica vel g�°te��as a
deslg�ei zz�plen�et`te a Pr�va1•�s
shallb lo�of projec� �e final
�°ndl Srall addxess ard
rep�Yt f ox des a o liznit tY'e
Specifi�a�lons tende
�onstxuction��` raZazds t� ding
of seism'� in�lu 32
e�£e�ts �d utilities, dahon
s�zu�t'��es d t�:���n
b,�,�x�otilimi�e i�es,ueilitiy
drlvex`p eX �ation
des�gn, n c�
ade pr pa�ation�fill
�OTTId� action d
S�bgr a�d�oznp walls ar
matezials talni�
ons,re
ti
S ecifi�a
CT ���
pYYLE CAhtQORTINGOPR�GBAM1t
NG
AN�
RE
M�TIGA��ON niONiTORI
�ate
Campletedl
� Timing Signa�Te
sEeT MeeaA�°a3' ►��- OriSi�?le�d�
gesp A,ction
I�,plementing
proceduxe Mon1toxinY,
�,tl ation Measute
M' ��
ent specifications�
con�Tete pa�em atexing
and drainage�d dew
ox�shall be �ate:
design�This reP iti ation
leted as a condition of GE�_ See NI� �GE�-1.
comp �entative M.easure gigna�ure'
ap�roval of the vesting ,ti ation Measuxe
of the See M� g
ma�ox adoption ent See Mitigation Measure 1
t a reem ,cal
develo men n level geotechn GEp-1•
GE�-2:The desig ` �1endations
report shall1nclude Tecom ents,
and improVem
for foundations arkinglo�s,and
in�luding Sidewalks,p
�hat tak�into
Subsur£aCe utilities'otennal effects of
d coxxosive soils•�e
consideration t e p
exp�'si"e a�e$ubmitted to�he City or
report shall b artme�
Building�ep
of Cupextino Toval.All design
review and apP pate:
ecifications Set foTtl'ln
cxitexia a�d Sp eotechni�al xepoTt Pxior to issuanCe°f
1eve1 g wotks building��r Sl�atuTe�
�he aesig�- ented as a condition Tading,
U ALITY �e Public and g an�,permits.
shallbe imple oval. Y AND wATER 4 onsor shall Department shall review pccup
of ro ect a LOG ro}ec�sp
HYDR� of�PPTO"al fox �rep Ye ahydYOlogy� verify�e dtaulic at1alYsis,
G• dition al sis o��e hydTOlogy�'Y
Hyp-1:AS a con �he City hydraulic an Y uent1Y require
ermitsr �x�l�system
existi�g S�oxm and subseq
constru�ti1On� storm�rainage uately �mproVements if necessaTy•
Engineer shall review foT the pxoject, it is adeq
to verify odate tlie .�e Ci sliall xevieW an 33
plans and calculationsisting stoxm S�ze�to accom�'
and verify whethei eX xo ect.
ctuxe affectedby the �noff from�he
drain infrastru t Cie
xa ect will meet cuYren
CT ElA
pPP4� �RE40RT1NG PROGRAM
ry11TlGATION D10NITORI�G AND
�pate
Completed�
�/ Timin� SigY►ature
pSSOCiATES' /C7C• raTtJ�
,,s A Respansible
2p13
g E Y T E M B E e �nl{02111g AC�1p11
I�plemenrin�PTOCedure M
ap�roVe plans
for anY such
IVlitigation Measuxe Shall �f t�'ey axe
xo ect sp impTO°e�'e�ts
onsox
2 ,The�' � �ned t�be necessary.
in the ability to Submit copies of�e determ roveme�ts Shall
ents,in�lud� g to�he City �e final imp
xeauirem toxm event,as �alysis ectedby the woxks
conVeY a�0-yeax s be�.x'sp of Public
are calculated peT Engineer. ed Department
events �he Santa Clara are deem Ce of
storm 2007}. (3)if facilities xQ ect pxior to issuan
dards set forth ln ual( de uate,the p � ermlts•
stan t Draina$e Man detexmi�e ina q i� lans an�y P
Coun y ineer
uld the C�ry En� drain facilities Sponsor shall subm P occu
Sho stoxm ear for the�onstxu�t�On to the
that the existing a 10-y u �rades
uate to convey ���a�t necessary P
are inadea ect app Engineer•
even�r�he prOJ City letion of
storm the design C�)Upon comp
shall be responsible fox the project
of the necessary
and construction �etion the upgradeS�
comp vvill dedicate the
ns.Up�n Sp ot
modificatio Will be dedicated t� fa�il ties to the City•
ents Wllib pate:
��,provem e
and the City to the issuance
the City oiny,maintenan�e' Fire Pxiox
responsible for ong associated Coun�y of grading, Slgnature:
�o�ex liabilities �e S�ta Claxa �hat
Yepaix,�` ents. DDUg NIATERIALS Sh�ll ent shall vexify demolition or
ve S AND HAZAR po�sox Departm l�s for the its.
with the im rO ,�e pxoject s ction p building perm
Hp,ZARD all that the followjng the constru
H' e contractor(s)Sh ensure rated clude:
�Z-1a:Th onents axe integ lans pro)e�t in of areas foT
e aTeas suitable for �omp �1�desi�anon
a�e storag and�vaste �onstructiori P Stoxage,
design elivery,storage= in�o��1e de�ivery�
ustbe as foT the pTOlect: xnateYial
Tnatexial d tters, o{axeas f°T �d waste collection;
�'�iese locations m C,��designation
farlaj^'y from�atchbasins,� delivery,stoTage� �2)prp°isions for �nventoty
and Calaba�as matetial Ce o�az�
drainage couxses' �d N,aste collecrion; main�ena� maeerials
p,ll hazardous
Creek as feas'b�e• rovisions f°T of hazardous
astes used ox retained on-site;and 3�
ro ect site develop- t�p �enanCe of an
matexials aadT ng P �
labeled an� of haZaTd°us
generated ities shallbe licable invento
�r,ent acri ith apP
ce w
Stiored in accordan
R07ECT EiR
pPPLE CAMpO�TING YROGRAFi
MiTIGA'�ION hti�NiTORtNG AND
REp
Uate
Comple{ed!
LSA ASSOCIATES, 1NC. Timing S1�atUTe
_°" onsible Pa�y1
SEYTEMBER �tesp
Implementing procedure
Monitoring P`ction
1vleasure er enc�,�reparedness
1Vlitigation site; (3)em &
materials retained an-
and response pTO�edures.
and federal regulations.In �d
to-date encY ljTep�edness
local,State, 3�emexg
addition,an accurate Up' onse proCedures•
including Material Safety and resp
i�ventorY, aintained°n-
�ata Sheets,shall be m TeSponse
site to assist emeTgen�Y hazaxd�us
el in the e°e�t of a
personn
� �aterials incide�t.
aintenance and f�eling�f
p,ll m d equlpment shall be
vehicles an a deSi�ated,be�r'�1ed
performed 1� an that will not
area,or ovex a dxip P Vehicles and
allow runoff of spi�ls. �hecked
ent shala be xegulaxly
equipm aired promptly
�d leaks shallbe rep
off-site location.SecondaxY
at an used to catch
containmen�shall be
ills any rin'e that vehicle or
leaks oT sp ensed,
equ��rnent fluids are disp
changed�°T p°ured.
easuxe H���b'
onse
N[itigatioz� aredness and xesp
Emergency prep developed bY tk'e
proceduxeS S�for emergencY
contractor(s) the event of an
notification ln 3�
accidental sp���ar°��'er hazard o;ect
er ency during p
materials em �and develo n'e�t
site Te ara��n
giR
ApeLE C R Y�R�INGpeROGRAM
M�T�GATION rt�N�T�R�N
G AND
pate
Comp�etedt
Tlming SlgnatuYe
ible�'artyl
.��s,�N�� Resp°�S p,ction
��Y���B�R`�z o ti 3 ���it��n�
Implexnentin$pYO�edu�e
Mitigation
I�easUre
ceduTes shall
�eSe pro ceduxes Spill
a�nvities•�a�ationpxO drequlred
ix�c�.ude e rocedUres'an
men�p u�pment as
tain �ti the
e
con al rOte ve din�,to
person p in resp� ctor�s)Shall of
appxopziate,�e�on the CitY
er�enCY• dures tO to
e b�it theS�pr�Ceroval p=1°T
Su o for app axatio�,or
Cupertin
de�olitiox�,site pzeP
d�velop�en�a�tivines•
these�'ltig,at�°�
lian�e v''ith n�ooxdinationte� Date:
ComP may occux 1 e Storm w`` the iss��'ce
�easuzes �,,lith th d Best prior tO a�xe:
co�`p 1 ian�e P lan an �he Fi r e Si�'
�,,,ith �ention ulred for Coun�, of gza di n Y,,
polluai e�n��,zactices TeQ G ,�e S�ta Clara �at de�olition°r
t Shall vexify erntits•
an g See Se�t�on V for all tme�' clude
pose P ' onsQr S�' D Par lans in building P
xop d Tana y�,t ater Quality �e pro�ect Sp ect-specific �onstri,,ction p dW a�er
H�'dTOlogY r��ect PTepare a PrO} dextake d gTOUn cols
al detail). on a��he p d Shall un Soil�'
eznen�prOto
addition Construch der a Eg1VLP�' Y'nal'ag tl�e ESMP
Za: un a�tivities ln t
Hp,Z- ducted cria Wi�the ES�' tified i vOC m�agemen
�on �ental Site �onstxu iden �
Site shall be �Enviton t ha�ls (in�luding
a��ox
dar'�e develop�`e�'t
PxO�e��Spee t Plan�ESMP with��'e onsox sl�all pXOtocols fOestern�ozner of
M�a�e d in���'SU1tati�of tlle ESNIp is �e pro�ect Sp ect-specific t11e northw 36
Fzepaxe .�1ie pti'rp°se `,,�oxk�xsr�1'e repare a prO� assessment' the xo e�t Site).
goQ.oB' �o�st uhce n �e�s���a e p aposha����x oxate into
tect viTan d
t P ubl�c, ts fron,sub an
gu�Te�p e
en o��upa�' �iQUSI
haz�sdous matexi.alS te
��R
qQ�� C �YOR�,NG YR�CGRAH�
A A�yD
�T�GA���N F`oNt�oR,NG atC
M V
Com41etedl
tie
Sl�,atu
�i�ing
ors�b�"ePa�1�
�esp A�tion
.�onitoiing
A��S,�N�• dUre
g�o�e
������8��Zo1� ��nt�l��i
1zn4�e
Soi1�'appz
M�tiga�1��Measuxe t1�e pzO�eonaox°�z�ls oT
e��s�te ard to �`1ti���e�Te���al�as
t11e�'x°�. appzopzlate�
ider`�ifs ahepoSSibnQw°�CQrra�`�
e k azfa�e.
e�oUn�eriri aia d5 in tiY`e S�e SQiI and
iz�an°z�oz�sra11 su�'zri 1 da�a�oUected
`I�`e��M�,,i ater a�`al��cxin�,past en�
gzO��e xole��S��een iEy�a�`aaezn
onve�'l�a�io ex�a ated S�i a a�`ed,a
optio�`S£Ox e
o�rdw ater f ea aux g d���to�ing�
g r e��a�n t e r d lden ti��' uiziz�g
ax� �arions;ar' eY weUs zea ���e
eX�a ox o�h�er 'n��m� �eS
a�lon, t �
irYig �b�,don d�edeza sta
pro4ez State,�` Sux £pz
witrlO�alatlo�,s� de�ea es
�d xegu 5���i�clv d ma�ay,1z�g pz
.�e ES�� testiri�,�a�` S ectea°f
eritifyiri�'` d�rrat�X std us
zo ya via
ysol�axt�o ��aiz�Y`P a 1:1�p a1in�
co e�SM s1� n �
kn°`N �'L1�oT e�a�u�,tin&,�'a Q�Soil
xz�atezla�s. �Sln�' 3'f
�edu and disp e�t
prO tiestiz�g, to�
Storiz�&� �atez duzix�g� a�ti�ities�
�d$xo�,ndand de�atezin�q��xed
ex�a`�a�l�z` Z�aeS�ziUe X �isl�t's
e��.i�ely; a Safeti`I p�� osed to
Xesp ei healtl�aY'ote�tla119 e�aa��e
�,,ork �QYkezs p . ls iz`a���z
�ox all �atez�a
�aZaxaous
E�R
Q�o E�GRAN
�
APQ�ND R 4o��,NG Yg0
�n
G
A
O
� hlaN���R
Mt't�GA�` �2.te
Cotnpletedl
Sl�na��Ye
'timinY,
le P aTty�
�espo"sib p,ction
Mo�ltosin�
1.5`� A�M$ER�� � ���.
S�Y.�E lementirgpYO�ed�xe
1mp
Measuxe
Mlti�,a�lOn
oxker Safe�'
federal w
With Sta�e a1'd d 31 desigX'ate
xegu�atiox�s'�` Sible fpz
pezsoz�e nta p�rof tY`e�SMP.
rian
implezne at tl�e�r°�ect Ssoi,
Fox aTeas a1��Cs 1z,
xp'Z�Z�te��lal res�-�"ater that axe
�„�ith p round"� ent with az'
il gasJ�r g ��elapnl a��por
p1az�ed fQO ed i build1z`$'
c�'p ed t sl�a�lbe
o�ezly'�g assessznen
int�s�°� b a li�ense o�a1 �ese eT
ed Y essi
eTforzn tal pro� estezx��Orn
� th
en w
e zea�i cludethe xe�lett P 04�N�rth
a at tre 1
of the S'te attid if e
axea th
g�ildi.�$`�V ��e pzoper�'' .
txus'Or z
Tasul�of tk`e�apate 1�e patie�'�al f o
�e t lyd��a Slo�ix'to azt
assessmen vapor lt`tz� eck des�� �e
sig�`��liedbui�.dinY��p�ontrols or SOUz
oc p �lude vap opTlate,in 3$
sra11�n �tl�r�g'ilato�Y a�'e�CY
oval,as app �ri�ations
xampzaezne�S Soil v�p d passlve
xequl �s�o,ild i��ll'vertin�• �1e
or�O��X�andloi acti�e en�and
��a���z���� �a�������x soU��e
v p d�a x
associate
T ElR
AyP4g D REyORTiCiG4YR�GRAM
NjTpRING AN
ON
h1 O
NtiT1GAT1
Date
Completedl
Timing g1gnatuT
e
TES� t"`� onsiblerarty�
SEPTEMSERA2�,3 ReSp A�tion
anitorinY,
Im lementing PrO�eduxe M
Date:
P
Measure pxior to the issuan�e
Mitigation ta Clara C�u�'��'xat of gTading, oT Sy�natuTe'
.�e San ��vexify� demolition,
orated lntO�he shall ent sh �„�a�e its.
be in�orp e xAZ-2a)• To ect sp�nSOt Depattm ent a�tivities building Petm
removal�� �easux m that haZardous all abatem d b a Qualified
aterials �'e p �
P�Miti ation ensure
ESM dQUS building �erials suxveyS been cextifle y rofessianal.
Hp,Z-3:HaZax �ted bY a building r"a tal p
condu ucted prioT t� envixonmen
S shal�be Yofessional f�r are cond
SuxpeY licensed p that all
qualified and demolition and
npt pieviously materials aTeith
all structures, toposed for hazatdous
ected oz abated,p e abated ln accordaz'ce W e
insp Yeno�'ation ar�' in lations•�
de�,olition°r Shall be in�luded existing re� or Shall submlt
project site.ACM uilding pra�ect spons
ous matetials b txucted Ci ,a xe}?oxt
t�ie l�aZard �ons to�he � ualified
S for buildia based paint srall pared bY a q
suTVey Lea � en�a�ptofessional,
to 1981. ardoUS�'atetial environm the
pxjOr ln a111�az lead- ents
be in�luded� eeling that dO�um
ll loose and P e abated of all abateme�
Sux�eys.A Shall b completion
aint and ACM
based p tractor(5�in �ctivities.
by Cettified�h lo�al State,and
uirements•p'll other
accoYdan�e
fedexal Teq ch as
us materials,Su removed
haZardo „ shall be
„u�versal waste T,'oT to demolition��
fYOmbu'ldix�gs p OSH gulations•
re
�e w�tl���e abatem�n�
accotaan letionof en�edby a
�1e comp do�um
activirieS Shall be e�tal
ed envix°d Submitted to tY'e 39
qualifi
pTOfessionalts� rior to the
City of CuPeTrino P
tcuction and
issUan�e of COe mits.
de�olitio�
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. APPLE CA6IPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
SEPTEMBER 2013 MITICATtON DIONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAD(
Responsible Party/ Date
Mitigation Measure Implementing Procedure Timing Completed/
Monitoring Action
Signature
HAZ-4:Implement Mitigation See Mitigation Measures See Mitigation Measures See Mitigation Date:
Measures HAZ-1 and HAZ-2. HAZ-1 and HAZ-2. HAZ-1 and HAZ-2. Measures HAZ-1
and HAZ-2. Si ature:
I. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION
TRANS-1:As part of the project,the The project sponsor shall The Public Works Prior to entering Date:
project sponsor shall construct an diligently pursue Mitigation Department shall review into a street
additional westbound lane at Measure TRANS-1, plans for the mitigation improvement Signature:
intersection#21 Wolfe Road/I-280 including seeking approval measure.and facilitate agreement,
Northbound Ramps to provide for from Caltrans,and,if discussions with Caltrans in including providing
dual left-turn and dual right-turn approved,shall implement order to implement this funding for
lanes.With the additional lane,the Mitigation Measure TRANS- measure. Caltrans, or bonds
intersection would operate at 1.The project sponsor shall or other surety to
acceptable LOS B(17.1 seconds) provide detailed guarantee the
during the AM peak hour.However, construction plans and shall improvement,the
the off-ramp intersection is under construct the mitigation project sponsor shall
Caltrans jurisdiction.Therefore, measure,or shall provide have plans
neither the project sponsor nor the funding to Caltrans approved by the
City of Cupertino can ensure the adequate for the design and City and Caltrans.In
implementation of the proposed construction of the the event that the
mitigation measure;thus the impact is improvement. project sponsor can
considered significant and demonstrate to the
unavoidable. satisfaction of the
Public Works
Department that,
despite their best
efforts,sufficient
progress has not
been made with the
res onsible a enc ,
40
2 pROJE�GRph►
Ayey��C R�p�RTiNG pR
MITIGATION R10
N�T�RtttG AN
�pate
Completedl
Timin$ Sl�natuxe
ons'b�`e PaT�t
Resp apction
LSA ASM�EAAZ y3,iNC• w,(Q�lt���a Shal}.be
SEPTB 1`ri �he funding
ImPlementin�pYO�eduYe es�x�z^'ix�
�ield�� e des��'
lie��f�h on of
Measuxe Snucti
M�tlgation and con
the�`itig,ation
Sub�e�t to
meaSU�e� ents af
the xeQ'�ix en Co
de
Gpvernm
Section
bbQ01�d�' Date�
prio=t�entering
to a s�reet a�ure.
�e Publ��NT orks �,d
in S��
evieW ro�ement
ent s�ia11 T irnp
shall dition, ag ent! ox
onSOr aztm
ro�ect sp Dep ve plans.In ad t tsees teem bo�ds
`�'e p aFPxO verifY tY�a in��udi�$
Tarta'� it detailed S xePaxed the City shall
Subm �onstru�tion of other Sure�to
p,t in�exsection#3e To�ect ction plan P the
'fRANS"2' pa�kWaY�th P constTU with�re affectedbY �lh�ated i�' axantee
i�a�cord��e City of re aze m�roVement$f the
A,venue1vallco txuct a�eX��usive of the the n'easu Mitigation shall
cons fot a to�al Teauliements �e with d B��_3 onsor
Spo�sor Shall hlane t o foz the accordan pTO�ect sF
thx la�e,°x'e thxQUgh CUpeztin e easures BIO-1 an lans
nor�hbOUnd ction�£�` M ha�e P
of one lefe-�zn l�Ir1Yht constru and appTOVed by the
�thz
°u�a�e on the easuTe
lane�arid°z'e shaxe�e�vu.�g mi�igation�' itigatio
a te lch �onstru�t the m
n City.
���l�e�,and e inteYSection wh
�ortr side of th measuxe.
zove intetsection 26
im �o a�Ceptable L�S C t 1
�,ould' P
opexations
Seconds�' e
ation measuz
�e�ro�osed mitig a�ts to tY'e
ve second��'imp �a�tau
�ould ha the ea�t side of
�,,�ould need to
tTees along a e fox 4l
ue.The YOadw Y to provid
p,,vez� e�ed to the east�of the txa�el
be W�� e to the right a�e�t to the
a bike lan ewalk adj
�ane a�d
tl�e Sld �m acts
bike�a�e.
Secondar
2 PR�� OGRA�
E
ApP AND REYORTINC' pB
M1T1GA,�t�N h10NIT�R�NG
�pate
ComPletedl
Tin,in� Si$natuTe
artY�
,N�� gesp°�'Slble r
Action
�S A A s s 8�R''ioi 3 MQ�1�OTiltgi
sEeT E'" proceduze
Implexnenting
Meas�re
1Vlitigation
re�,oval of trees
associa�ed witr th Under�,e Ciry o�
that are protectee� te�tion
e xo i�the �ate:
Cu�ertino S Tuld occuz w
ance�� easute. �tior to en�eTing
�Tdln n,itigation�' in Section to a s�eet Sl�at�xe:
identt�1ed d 81��3 DE .-�, ubll� t
e P NtoYks in
BIO-1 an IR veme�'
acts urces ln r shall ent shall tevle"� imPTO �ith the
V D Biolog��al Reotential Seco�da�' °r`S� iti ation DepaT�the mltigation agreen�►eY't
theSe p �e pr4ject sp of Cupertino�
addtesses ursve NL K plans and fa�ilitate City onsor
im acts• A�irtexsec�ion
#36 Stevens d�ligent1Y p NS_3, meas'�xe ith Caltrans a�d the prO�ect sP
3 �rivel�'2g� easuxe� . roval Ssions�`' in aVe Pl
Seeking aPp discu ta Claxa sk�allh b the
�e goule�axdlCa�o,e�t sponsox M cluding, d the C�ty Ci�y of S�' tkus Toved Y
Caltxa�s ax�. the i�n len1e�'t ap� of Santa Clara
C tk'e p d,if OTde�to P
gamPs�`Nest)� ex�l'�si`je fTO� Clara,aT' C1�Y
tzuct an e��ox a total of S�ta and provide a
shall cons tuxnlan ro�edf Srall implement measuxe. aTantee
und xigk'�" es and one r'ght finan�ial�
eastbo app re
�tiitigation MeaSU �ngat�°n
througY'lan eastbound e pro�ect �ox the t�n
o����e)and provide an�ls�,aould ,����5-3.Th In the
rovic�e measure'
overla�phas • �ons to Sor shall p lans e�e�t tha�the can
S�'On d constx�ction P
righ�-turn eCtion oPer� itigation
te pTO�ect Sp°'�S°T
ve in�exs mmo'�a detaile to tY`e
la ero S �uct th e
ptable L� �e e�Sting buf f�alk and�u e,oi sY�a11 prO f S ta dem faC�on o f�re
dea la�e and Slde meas to the Cl�� �a�s
blicw°T�
betweex��he to be 1i i�'ated and the �nding a maXim„'Y`°f p� at,
need to t�,e existing Clata Eup tO � D��axtment th
Would ed�losex 82��to desig�an e ite eix best
Sldewalk p'ask' Side of Stevens �554, either�1� th deS th
on the S°U�Y' mitigat���' �onstruct a�pn 42
fence v�Td.�'�s tified tniri$
goule uire iden �,altex�ate
Creek would also req ox',�2� uld
m Te eXisting Streetlig,ht' easure W°
easu m h��'
cation of an ole.
irn zovernent w
f'1 e hydra�'t,and utility 1'
APPLE CAh1PUS 2 PROIECTRAr
M�T{GATIOn MONITORING AND REYQRTiNG PBOG
LSA AS90C►ATES, �NC• D1te
SEPTEMBER 2��3 letedl
Comp
ReSponsible Party� Timing Si�ature
Impleinenting procedure Monitoring Action
Mitigation Measure efforts,the City of
act to the Santa Claxa will not
approve the
This intersection is a CMP inter f 5a�t alti gacti n of the City of i�en�ified mitigation
and is located w�tivn the City o Cupertino's Public Works measure,then the
C]ara.It is also under Caltrans Department. pro�ect sponsor shall
jurisdiction.The pro}ect sponsor
provide the
would be requireClara and Caltransh maximum funding
the City of Santa S�ca1 to the City of
to construct the identified phy Cupertino to be held
impro'�emen�lvert D ivel�-28 rRamp in escrow unti]ax�
Boulevard(C alternate
(west)intexsection.Since this impravennent
intersection is outside of the City of satisfactory to the
Cupertino's jurisdiction,the City
C�ty of Cupertino's
cannot guarantee that the Public Works
improvement would b ac{�ou aed' Department is
For this reason the imp approved,subject to
remain significar►t and unavoidable. the requirements of
Government Code
Section 66001(d}.
�e�nds will be
released to the
responsible agency
once the project is
approved and
prograxnmed,with
a�y excess funds
returned to the
43
LSA ASSOCIATES. INC. APPLE CADiPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
SEPTEMBER 2013 MITIGATION 11fON►TORING AND REPORTING PROGRAIN
Responsible Party/ Date
Mitigation Measure Implementing Procedure Timing Completed/
Monitoring Action
Signature
ro'ect s onsor.
TRANS-4:At intersection#5 De Anza The project sponsor shall The Public Works Prior to entering Date:
Boulevard/Homestead Road the submit detailed Department shall review and into a street
project sponsor shall construct an construction plans prepared approve plans for the improvement Signature:
exclusive southbound right-turn lane in accordance with the mitigation measure.In agreement,
(for a total of two left-turn lanes,three requirements of the City of addition,the City shall verify including bonds or
through lanes,and one right-turn Cupertino for the that trees affected by other surety to
lane)which would improve construction of the construction of the measure guarantee the
intersection operations to LOS E+. mitigation measure and are mitigated in accordance mitigation measure,
Although still considered an construct the mitigation with Mitigation Measures the project sponsor
unacceptable LOS based on measure. BIO-1 and BIO-3. shall have plans
Cupertino's standards,this mitigation approved by the
measure would improve operations City.
over Background No Project
Conditions.
With the mitigation measure
identified above,secondary impacts
associated with the removal of trees
could occur.Trees are protected
under the City of Cupertino's Tree
Protection Ordinance.Impacts BIO-1
and BIO-3 in Section V.D,Biological
Resources addresses these potential
secondary impacts related to potential
tree removal.
TRANS-5:At intersection#21 Wolfe See Mitigation Measure See Mitigation Measure See Mitigation Date:
Road/I-280 Northbound Ramps,the TIZANS-1. TRANS-1. Measure TTZANS-1.
ro'ect s onsor shall im lement Si nature:
44
AYYLE CAM4ll5 2 PROJECT EIR
T10P1 rt�N�TaR1NG AND
REYORTING pR�GftAM
MITIGA
Date
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
SEPTEMBER 1013
Completed
Responsible Party� Timing Si�ature
Implementing PTOCedure
Monitorin$Action
1Vlitigation Measuxe
Ml�igation Measure TRANS-1
(provide dual left-and�h ch would
lanes on the off-ramp)� erations to
�mprove interse Bi 18�econds).
acceptable LOS t intersecrion is
However,the off-ramp
under Caltrans juxisdictio,�Cant nor
Therefore,£Cuhe t�o capensure the
the Crty a p pro osed
implementation of thhus he impact is Date:
m�tigation measure;
Pxior to entering
considered significant and �e public Works into a street S��a�xe;
unavoidable. �e project sponsor shall De artment shall review an� impravement
submit detailed construction apprave plans for the a�reement,
TRANS-6:At i.ntersection#27 Tantau
omestead Road the project � easure.In bonds or
Avenue/H �ans prepared in miti ation m including
addition,the City shall verify
eastbound accordance with the other surety to
Sponsor shall c from Ct an exclusive �rements of the Ci�'°f t txees affected by
right-tuxn�ane reqU ga�on tha arantee the
tal of one Cupertino for the mih mit�gation measure,
construction of the measure
Homestead Roedit�o a{thbound Sure.`I�he pro}eC{ �iti ated in accoxdance � ponsor
Tantau Avenu ( inea �t{he are g the pro ec�s
lane,tN'� Sponsox shall constru with Mitigation Measures Shall have plans
eastbound left-turn a�d one �nd B�O-3.
�h aanes, �itigation measure.For any BIO 1 approved by the
eastbound thxou N,hich
protected trees that areo�sor Ca�''
eastbound Yight-tuln lane}, ro ect sp
would improve ix�tersection 52 6 affected,�he P � ation
shall implement Mitig
operations to acceptable L�S D- 1 and BIO-3.
seconds). Measures BIO-
With the mitigation measure
identified above,secondary impacts
associated with the xemov��°�tTees
45
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
SEPTEMBER 2013 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAAt
Responsible Party/ Date
Mitigation Measure Implementing Procedure Timing Completed/
Monitoring Action
Signature
could occur.Trees are protected
under the City of Cupertino's Tree
Protection Ordinance.Impacts BIO-1
and BIO-3 in Section V.D,Biological
Resources addresses these potential
secondary impacts related to potential
tree removal.
TRANS-7:At intersection#31 Tantau See Mitigation Measure See Mitigation Measure See Mitigation Date:
Avenue/Vallco Parkway,the project TIZANS-2. TRANS-2. Measure TRANS-2.
sponsor shall implement Mitigation Signature:
Measure TRANS-2(add exclusive
northbound through lane),which
would improve intersection
operations to acceptable LOS C(28.7
seconds).
TREINS-8:At intersection#32 Tantau The project sponsor shall The Public Works Prior to entering Date:
Avenue/Stevens Creek Boulevard,the submit detailed Department shall review and into a street
project sponsor shall construct a 100- construction plans prepared approve plans for the improvement Signature:
foot exclusive southbound right-turn in accordance with the mitigation measure.. agreement,
lane(for a total of two southbound requirements of the City of including bonds or
left-turn lanes and one southbound Cupertino for the other surety to
right-turn lane),with associated construction of the guarantee the
improvements in the right-of-way, mitigation measure and mitigation measure,
which would improve intersection construct the mitigation the project sponsor
operations to acceptable LOS D(46.8 measure. shall have plans
seconds). approved by the
Ci
TRANS-9a:At intersection#36 TRANS-9a The project TRANS-9a:The Public Works Date:
Stevens Creek Boulevard/Calvert s onsor shall rovide De artment shall review
46
�T g/R
AepL N9C REyORTiNGOYR�GRANt
�tTOR�NG A
MtT1GAT�ON
nt o
•pate
Completedt
in�, SignatuTe
'Tim
vns�ble r ax�'j re�
o�IATES.�NC� �esp Sig�a�''
ASS � p,ction to
20j3
SEeTEM$ER pTO�eduxe 1Vionitori g TRA�S-9a:Pr�°�Teet
lementin�, iti ation en�ering into
In1F the m g vemen�
plans f or and�acilitate ,�'pTO ent w1t11 tre
rrlitigation Measure �rion plans City of
�onstru meaSUxes a�Teem
ct the Ssiorrs With tY`1�ent this of Cu�ertino,
detailed �onstTU dis� to lmp Ct�' onsor
the prO�e�t ax,d shall o=Sliall Sa�ta Claxa the pzo�ect sp
p RampS��"'est), ation anQn�eaSUTer Cit ave plans
DTavel�-28 �emex`t M'tig, mitig nding to the 9 measure. t Shall h b the
shall imp d ex�lusive pxo�ide�u a e Co�„nuni y approved Y
Spox�sox NS_3 lad of S Clara�1531,288)to NS_9b:`�' artx�'en� of S�ta Clara
nd�ght_turn lane�'whlch anta TRp, CitY
Measure TRA maXlmu�,of� � ment Dep following aide a
ction d�onstxuct either �evelop e the and��O
eastbou �p�e interse L�S F�' design�' iti ation deTtak cial$uaxa�tee
w°ul,�'mp 112•2 seconds� e�tified m g ate srall un �pzing tasks,�S �ina�' ation
S ��,)tbe id altern ,�M mQn' refer�p for the�ltig
opetat��ns the Ste�e�s Creek gamp or;�2�an N,ould d below t �tl�e
Ho`,,jeVer, I-2ga measure t wlti�h sum�`arize of the Dxaft EIR measures•
Calvert Drivel ue�o pages 441-447 e
N,ould contix� impxoven`en a�t to�e e�ent that th can
goulevardl {�e imp onal detail}� at tl'e °r
v�texsectior' PTOn dangwith mitigate of the Clty of for additi pro�ect SP°ns
(west� cCeptab�y• Niorks e City shall tetain, {e to the
opeTa�e una ht_t,�r Satisfa�n°n ublic �1�Th ,S cost��` dem�r'stxa of tl'e
elized free Tlg lane°�' U ertino S P roje�t 5�'ons�r appro�ed Sarisf a�tion
cl�az�x� und xeceiving C P
a�hirdeastbO kbetweenste�ens De�axtment' �ndependentCity��K� Publicw�zks at,
lin � �t�'
the cor�nectox d Lawren�e txansp°xtation p an Depaztmen
xo�ect
,�Ng-9b��`e}? fixm to,°n best
goule�axd� of �ement�' en�ineering cle desp tl�eir
distan�e a11 ixnp ite
C-reelc fpz a ln�luding a S�o�sox Sh asis collect ve�u �he Clry of
EXpress�a�'� 125�feet al to eXpanded,tpNLProgram �ua�b ect dl��e efforts, will nOti
�tely traffic sign a 3r�pexcent ts£�a'oT pa king facilities Santa Clara
app�Ox�m actua�ed
pedeStxian- �e�ted Pedestxian e that reSUlts lnode�artia ized `^tays an exioa�Tl,e appro�e t�'e iti ation
for pro zefug alternative m Summ a 2-week� iden�ify iden�ified m g
al�.oW the�edestrian Tate�as es 441- o`'er �n,axily then the
tezsection lpation to a& Teport shallp To�ect is measute,
�ossings to roVe�n refex 1� or Shall
would�rc`P +wit1�3g•6 below( far `,,lhethez th P pro�ect sp�s
raft EIR ore th�4J270
islanar LOS D 447 of�e D d�,`��� pxovide t e
opexatas�aelay. shall a�detail)� �eneratin�m funaln$
ro�ect sp�nsOr addition �en�«New and AM peak hOUr tTlps b t shall maXimum
STRp,NS-9b:`I�'e p to xedu�e M �1�Imple PM peak h°ur txips� Cl� pf
xogxas�' TU pYOject�M e txip x�tes to tl�e Y
expand the�M e lm�act per the EXpa�,ded �isted on pa�e also xepoxt��M a�d pNi
af�h 4'1
the Se�eri ty Su bsection• d �easUxes eX�ressed as
EXpansioM paxticipation� the Draft E IIZ• aftex
�rogram �42°f onths
� the� m e shaTe Staxtin 6 m
cxeasing ative °a t�,ou1d t��
associated altern 3�pexcen
2g pexcen�to
fxom
ROJECT E1R
APYLE ��EYORTING PROGRAri
M�•[1GATtON h10NiTQRtNG
AND
Uate
Completed(
LSA ASSOCIATES' lNC• '�l]Z1111g
Z O 1 3 �'l�a�T
S E P T E M B E R ReSponsible PartyJ
Monitoring p`ction
Implementing Procedure Cupertino to be held
in escxow un{il a�
IVleasure peak hour vehicle trips per
1Vlitigation Shall
occu anCy of Phase 1,�o� emp�OYee.�e To e this alternare ent
p ebruarY�5 and apP improvem
F 142•8 review to the
�S t later tha�F
improVe°pexations to L the pxoject xepo=t satisfactor}'
�e�entation of each year, eak houx C��o f Cuperrino's
Without imp rovide��ar �2��f ANI or PM p
seconds} ever it would not Sponsor shall,P the City exceeded,the public Works
TRANS"3;hOw annual report to trips counts aTe eet
act to a less-than" ear, pepartment is
reduce the imp xobust mo�tOTing the priox calendaT y City shall notify�o�r to sub'ect to
si�ificar►{1eve1.A the Specific�I'DM zO ect sp approved, l
descxibix►g with�he p � uirements of
rogram has been idenrified in the deVelop a plan and identify the req
p EX ansion subsection �easures that are bQ11 ber of easures to achieve ent Code
M Progxam � implemented�fihe num �/I xn Governm
T� uired to ensure that new� counts. b6001(d).
�d Shall be reQ atior► ees�contract the peak hour trip Sh��be S�eif�ds will be
tivs TDM pxOgxaxn mitig employ the site,and rnonitoring
]eme��ed and that the e�p�oyees on Follow-up 60 days�f to the
of the measuxes �onducted within M released �
xneasure is imp is achieved. the success M of new`� responsible agenc
requared trip reduction�ram aTe imp�ementation
.�M pro eXpressed iri A o�ce the pxO]ect�s
eakhour vehicle
�etails of tl�ethe`I�M PrOgram and PM p measures. o�or does approved and
discussed in �d vehicle trips peT �3}If the pro]ect sp edr N,��h
trips lement City- program�
Expansion subsection. employee. ree to lmpmeasuxes,the any eXCess funds
ual report sha11 also ap�roved`�M` to the
�e ann ro ect xeturn
on APPIe ed
lnclude data Cl�,Shall assess t11e P p onsor.
ublic S o�o r a�5 peT day tri �To�ect sp
transi t r i d e x shi p�p P ind�Xed to t h e
transit tidership� enal�'� rice Ix�dex)fox al1 ,�,NS-9b:
volumeS� Co�u�ex p
clinglWalking M eak- ,� �uni.ty
cy 7d A P e Com
and caxpool volumeS• txips above 4�2 ��00 ment
the AM vehicle trips and pe�elop
�3)If one or botih of hour vehicle trips Department shall
eak hout vehicle eak-h°ur
and PM p 4,720 AM PM p onitoring pexiod• conduct annual
trip�ounts(i•e•! S and cturing�e�' monitoring for�e
4 I f�e project sponsor
peak-houT vehlcle trip ent City- first 10 years of tYLe
eak hour vehicle ( ) lem
4,4aa PM p a rees to imP easures and
� �rI m
trips)are eX�eeded,the a ro�ed`� 48
pxoject sponsor shall meet
JECT EtR
pYPLE C REPORTiNG PROGRAM
M�T�GATION �10N1TOR►NG �ND
�ate
Completedl
�N�• Timing gignature
�ssocrn-rES. le Paxtyl
LSA $ER 2013 �eSpa�sib
SEPTEM ACt1On
pracedure Mo�ltonn� �ro�ect.If in the last
Implementing the 10-
monitoting g yeaxs of
Iviitigation Measure follow"uP within 60 wa�M year period the peak
to develop a (condu�ted ts are
With the CitY of ne houx trip coun
ent new entarion
p��a�d implem implem
l�cluding �ndicates that pea no�eX�eeded�all be
�M measuTes C rneasutes�� ts are still monitoring
M coun
those"Additional`� hour trip City shall �o�du�ted every
Nleasures"listed on Pa�e eX�eeded,t�e a�3 per day trip oth�r yeac•
raft EIR}to meet
443 of the D assess App to the Ho�,�,evex,if any
counts• ena�tY�indexed £or all potts
the required tx�p xice Index} monitoring re
easures shall Coxisumex P eak- ears
ese'T1�M� 7p p,M p �he last 3 y
�` ted by the �lps above�,2 d�l404 for
be implemen icate that the
within b� vehi.�le txips� ind'
pCO�ect sponsor h�ux hour vehicle tYips peak hour�rips
�otified by�1e PM�eak- eriod• are being
days of being, eak hQUr trip the reporting P �ounts
City tY+at the p du=i�'g fees collected eXCeeded�
exceeded• �5�TriP penalty used to Sha1.l be
counts are being shall be nnonitoring
or both of the AM by the City w�de on an
t4�If one condu�ted u�til
and PM peak 11OUr vehicle �rovide for City"of,�M al basis
i.mplementation annu
counts are not rovement the�,eak hour�1P
txip the pro)ect pYOgramS and imp .
exceeded, d edestnan �ounts have not
of bike� p been exceeded f�r
5ponsor sh�1�Mt�easures tive
implemen facilities. thxee consecu
to maintain
that annua�TQports.
complianCe�
�5�Igl even after
implementation of new
.�M zneasures,the P'M
eak hour velv�le
and�'M p eXCeeded,
�rip co�ntS axe
ro ect sponsor shall
the P �ith the Cl�'to 49
meet N' 1an and
reevaluate the
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. APPLE CAM1IPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
SEPTEMBER 2013 MITIGATION DIONITORIIVC AND REPORTING PROGRABI
Responsible Party/ Date
Mitigation Measure Implementing Procedure Timing Completed/
Monitoring Action
Signature
implement new TDM
measures to meet the
required trip counts.These
TDM measures shall be
implemented by the project
sponsor within 60 days of
being notified by the City
that the peak hour trip
counts continue to be
exceeded.
(6)The project sponsor shall
pay arulual monitoring
costs of Mitigation Measure
TRANS-9b,including the
cost to conduct monitoring
and City staff time to
review the annual
monitoring reports.
(7)The project sponsor shall
pay all fees associated with
exceedances of the AM and
PM peak hour vehicle trip
counts.
TRANS-10:At intersection#40 The project sponsor shall The Public Works Department Prior to entering Date:
Stevens Creek Boulevard/Lawrence diligently pursue Mitigation shall review plans for into a street
Expressway(east)the project sponsor Measure TRANS-10, construction of the mitigation improvement Signature:
shall construct a northbound left-turn including seeking approval measure,and facilitate agreement with the
lane(for a total of two exclusive left- from the City of Santa Clara, discussions with VTA and the City of Cupertino,
turn lanes,one shared left- and,if a roved,shall Ci of Santa Clara in order to the ro'ect s onsor
50
T gIR
pPQLE C REppRT1NG pR�GRA��
M1TtGAT��N �tONiTORiNG AND
�ate
Completedl
Timin$ Slgnatuxe
pC1ATE5.tNC• onsib1eraT��
ASS Resp A�tio�n
sEeTEmaEx ao�3 OnitOTlI►$ S
lementing rrO�edaxe NI Shall Y►a�e Plan
Imp lemen�this�'easure. appxo�ed bY tClara
Niitigation Measuxe
imp City of Santa
ent M'�'gation and pTOVide a tee
implem TRANS-10.The cial g�aran
d Shared MeaSUre or Shall
finan iti ation
h lane an a to praject spons for the�' �g the
��s,jthxoug ��e}£xom me�ure.
kit-tux� xessw Y detailed Shall
thxoug�rig �awxen�e Exp provide lans and �,tha�tY'e
p,oulevard• constTUCtion p even
norehUoUnd Creek mitig,ation pro�ect sponsar�an
d Stevens ro�e to the
�„jestboun u�d imp constYU�t t e Tovide demonstrate
ation w� pg D(49�7 ox shall p
.this rnitig measuxe� e Cl�,of Santa of the
erations to L �ion
t is f�,ding to th of Satisf ac
intersection°p impz°vemen lt�ould to a xnaxim��' public w°rks
ds�•T� �,vever� Claxa tuP design and ent thati'
Secon �easible;hO �1�276,601)to �epartm
physically of a zetain�g
tru�tion despite thear best
the cons truct eithet t1}�h� City of
requixe to the cons �,itigatian
odifications te �lfied efforts+�he
jniall and m accommoda iden �2�an alten�ate Claza will not
roachtO lane� eor; �,aou1d Santa
eastbound aPp �,easuT whlch apprO�e tr►e
itionalleft-turn Tovement �o the m�ttgation
the add� imp the impa�t tif.ied
CMP intersection m�tigate lden �hen the
�iis in�ersection LS a
of Santa Claxa. of t�ie City of ineasute, Shall
Cl�, satisfa�tion PublicWorks
OT
v�,ithin t�'e pTOject spox�s
�ouldbe CupeYtino s
located onsor VTA,C�� ent. provide the
.�e ptoje��Sp te with Depaxtm fundin�
reauixed to coordina �nsible znax�mum
othex TesP ri£ied to�he Cl�to be held
Clara,and iden
of Santa {o�onstru�t the Cupertino
en�ies �at the Ste°ens y�,until�
a� in escta
hysical imprp°emen
p Boulevaxd1Lawxe��e
S(east} al{ernate ent
Cxeek gamp imptO�em
Expressway SinCe th's
i�teTSection 15 to the
intersection• of Cup
ertix�o�S Ctisf o ftiCu ertir�o s
the C'tY ot guarantee
outside of Clry cann dbe
�uxisdiction,t�1e entN1O�1 5�
�}iat the am��OVem
this Yeason tY'e d
constru�t o a�emain significant an
imp��t w
unavoidable.
�R
�� CAF�YOR'CtNC' QROGRAp1
pp4 ANp R
�T�GA���N�,oN,�oR1NG ate
M � a'
lete
Comp
e
S��atuz
,ti�ing
lepaYtyf
gesp°�'S'� p,.cn�n �ozks
Morl�orin� Pub�i�tn� t�S to
iNC' e�
.��s, ��zo�eduze Uepax d SUb�ec'k
P �
s�Y�E�,gEg�°�' �entln$ to�e e1�ts�
In�'�1e tl1e re�nlm n C�de
S�Ye Gave 6bp01�d�'
�ltigat�OnT,Ilea S�e�ds w�rb e
seleased ble a�,ex��y
o pe re pr°�a�ls
d az�
appsove �edj�ltr
�xogza ess�nas
ar�e�ea to t11e
ze eC�S pz�soT' Da�e'
z� �o e�teTin� a�xe:
e azt�`e'nt P nto a Stxee ent Si�'
s� p
ub1i��°tk S�oX t�e iz,�pr°�e �witl�t1�e
'�`e P ew plaxl d xeexx� tirio,
onspz sra�l s�,all revl n�neasuTe a with Ciky of CupeT onspz
roje��S� e IJ�.���a��x� z�`it�gati� d�s�ussi��`St1ze the pX°�ect Spans
�e e���`I p'xxsug-1, £acilitate v,�A�ax'd a iz��rd�r s�,a11 Y`av a by�1�e
ec n o�#�� aili&S�T e�ZAI`�n g a p pxo�al Caltza�`s,o�S�ta C1�e a SUre a p pzove o f 5�tia
t�t iz`ters �28� M cling Seek of S�`ta CauntiY ent t11is CourtY zoyide a
�NS'11�Xpxess`1'�a the prO�ec� �e ��C�v the Co�z`� ro�ed, �o in'ple� sh�� Clara and p az��ee
`a.�,�xexlce a�az�ps' �ex�l`�`s� ,og �x°�` �,d�lf ap� l��aeior Ci�Y
Ut�boUn Co�s���, a to�a C�axa, e��� a���o�,tre ��S�ans°£ ��ar�lal g atiot�
So z 5�aU lane I�OTh er ox�e aU iz,c,ple��s-1.'SY`e Iz`ad �at a11 Pz°teratjO�` �or tre�'�I$tre
S�o�s° d thr�ug� t1�z�u� la� sn easure ShaU vezlf�' bed A1 xiox�O m.eas`�Xe� t1�e
eaStboUa edle�t�T ol�e r�gh��`�'z� M o�e�t Sp°ns°ed aU tY`e Stxeae�are tx�et c�ion°� e�ex�t tk�at
sl� d .�e � detai� d sh Teen� Stzu 52
o�e U �1ax�Q�a�'�ld irnpY° �e table rovide ��s a� Ag a�Tiz�g co� �
t11xo � �Y,v�ro Stoac p tior p t��t�onp � a�lOn and o�exz�e� �
e ,w� ezatior e m�ti�a cons cti�y`e� g zo�i�e tlle ixn x
lar 1 e��ioz��p nasl.`�' a�l p o f
irrexs 9 Se�� e tk�e 11 ��rs�u er�O S e aun
��S�+�56'o��d xequix e�aining`�'ta ld xrieas �1� C
e W o�a reW r �„�ov �ndin
�`easux tio� veTtRQad
�ons�u� sis��e C� erl ali
a���g12SO,�x�ea to r�
d to be
�ee
T ElR
Ape1E C REYO[ITINGOpR�GRAht
MtTiGATi�N RiON]TORIN
G �nD
pate
Completedt
Tlming Si�ataxe
ASSOCtATES. �N�� PaY�'�
L S� &1 B E R 2 013 gespansible
S E Y T E p,ction
pYOCedure Monitoting onsor can
Implementing �roject sp
dernonstrate to�he
ation Measure of the
1v1itig a satisfact�a ks
Clara(uP to public
Santa 2 923,074)to ent that�
the or►- um of$ , �epattm
lanes a� �axim tiruc�eitl�eT eir best
o receiving rig�t_of-v�'aY design and cons deSpite th
with� existing ed mitigation Coun�'
xamp.'Tl�ere ls ation �1�the identih e£forts,the
date this mitig or,�2)an alternate �lara will
to accom�� uire measure whlch.�,vould of Santa
�,easure. ould xeq impzo�ement not aPPxOVe�he
the measuxe w act to the mltigation
Ho�,,7ever, bridge that mitigate the imp of identified
�e existing arallel to e C'�' the�the
widening Satisfaction�f blic W�rks measuxe� oT shall
S the cxeek xunning p Cupertino`S�'u pro�ect spons
cxosse rence
the west side of Law n Would Deparement. provide the
EXpTesswaY•�e wlda�o the creek. ro ect sponsot shall funding
�e p � bed Altexation maximum
econaary imp acts to the seek a S�eam to the City of
cause s to be held
potential secona w th widen�n�the A�reemen�from th ent of Cupertino
cxeek associated 1�1 ation ia pepar{►� un�il an
e aS a�raffic m � Californ CpFW) in escrow
exist�ngbrldg Se�nOn Fish and Wildlife t altex�ate
aze addressed i� othex applicable
measure and any creek improvem�to the
Biological ReSQUrces. ermlts for
V p, xegulatory P Shall camply satisfactory ertino's
CMP intexsectiox� l�t�slon and tified Ciry of C�'�
and port�ons ditions i den public�ar ks
.�S l�texsection Tes W ay with all�Qn p,ltexation
on a Coun�y eXp ht-of- in the gtreamUed pepartment is
within Caltrans x�g other subject to
are likely onsox would be A�reement oT aPPrp°ed,
.�e project sp the uixexnents of
`„Iay, v,�ithvTA xe$ulatory Pexm�t. the xeq Code
required to coordinate other
Clara,and GoveTnment
�, of Sa�ta 66001(d)•
COUn y encies to constxuct the Section ���be
tesponsible a$ roveme�t at �'Yie fundS`'`'
identified]?hysical i�P a 11-280 tO the
ressw y released
the Lawrence EXP SlnCe thls
Ramps a�,tersection. tY►e City of 53
in�ersection is outside of �it
uxisdiction,�he Y
Cupettino S� tee that it would be
can�ot Uaran
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
SEPTEMBER 2013 MITIGAT►ON DIONITOR[NG AND REPORTING PROGRADI
Responsible Party/ Date
Mitigation Measure Implementing Procedure Monitoring Action Timing Completed/
Signature
constructed.For this reason the responsible agency
impact would remain significant and once the project is
unavoidable. approved and
programmed,with
any excess funds
returned to the
ro'ect s onsor.
TRANS-12:At intersection#5 De See Mitigation Measure See Mitigation Measure See Mitigation Date:
Anza Boulevard/Homestead Road TRANS-4. TRANS-4. Measure TRANS-4.
intersection,the project sponsor shall Signature:
implement Mitigation Measure
TRANS-4(add exclusive southbound
right-turn lane),which would
improve intersection operations to
LOS E+(58.9 seconds). Though LOS
E+is not considered acceptable at the
#5 De Anza Boulevard/Homestead
Road intersection,the LOS would
improve to better operating
conditions than under the Cumulative
No Project scenario and the impact
would be considered less than
si ificant.
TRAN-13a:No feasible measure. See Mitigation Measure See Mitigation Measure See Mitigation Date:
TRANS-9b. TRANS-9b. Measure TRANS-9b.
TRANS-13b:T'he project sponsor shall Signature:
expand the TDM program to reduce The project sponsor shall The Public Works The funding for
the severity of the impact.Increasing provide$50,000 towards the Department shall develop implementation of
the TDM artici ation and associated im lementation of lans im lementin an TRANS-13c shall be
54
APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT E1R
M�raGATION b10N1TORING AND
REPORT►NG PR�GRA�'1
Date
sEeTeNieExAioii' ►"c. COxripleted/
Responsible Paxty(
Timing Si�ature
Implementing Procedure
1Vlonitoxing A�tiion
Mltigation Measure
a�s stem provided prior to
adaptive traffic sign Y en�e�ing��t�a street
easure alo�g De�a Boulevard, im ro�ement
Mlt�gation M�le��ding
�'�NS-13c. p00 from the p
alternative mode share from 28 rove shall collect$5�� a reement.
ercent would imp Shall be provided to the pro�ect sponsor,and shall g
percent to 34 p ertino. rovement.
E 62•1 seconds); Cl�of Cup imp�ement the imp
operations to LOS �
however the increase in`�`�M
participation would not r,aCant le e�•
impact to a less-than-sign
'TIZANS-13c:The project sponsor shall
provide a$50,000 fair-share
contribution towards the
implementatio St m along De A�a
traffic signal sy omestead Road
Boulevard between H lementation
an�Rainb{v D raffic s g al system
of an adap
would imprpVe intersection Date:
operations,how e v e r i t w ou�d not Se e M i t i g a t i on
act to a less-than- Measure Z`I�NS'1.
reduce the imp See Mitigation Measure S�gnature:
S� ificant]evel.
olfe See Mitigation Measure .�ANS�1
'tRANS-14:At intersection##21 W ,.T,�NS-1.
Road(I-2$�Noxthbound Ramps�{he
project spo�SOT shall implement
1vlitigation Measure TRANS-1
(provide dua]]eft-and righpVe � Date:
]anes),which would imp table artment Prior to entering
intersectioz�operations to accep .�e public Works Dep �nto a street
ponsor shall lans er the
LOS B(18.a seconds)• �e project s shal]develo
.�e project sponsor shall ro rata share to
�p,NS-15: a a ��
contribute a ro rata share to modif
ECT ElR
AepL��C REppRTINGOYR�GRAn1
MtTtGATiON h10NITOKING AN
Date
Completedl
Timi�g Si�ature
le ra�Y�
oC1AT6S, �N�� o�sib a�re:
gesp Activn Si�`
s�rTEMSEx xoia �pni�Oflng
pxocedure M improveme�'t
Implen1en�ng e determine ent.
mitigati°n
m�asux to modify agxeem
MeasuYe
rrlitigation iti ation the pTO xata share exations,
implern`ent the m g the nal°p fTOm
rovide uxsuant to �he t�affic Si� d�ng
eTations t�P measure,p of the City of �ollect pro T�ta�' and shall
the t^'estboun requlYements �ect sp�nsOr`
o d
{he�Taffic sl�al p ro ation
hase for �,�,ould Cupertino� thm�lement the ml��'
�,overlap movement��n'hich
right-turn Teen z1Yht-turz�arr°w
measuxe-
provide foT a� d left-n'�'
thboun
whlle the S has its green h�1e.
movernent �rns Shall a1sQ be
Sout�bound U" �odate the
TO a���m etxies at the
pTOhibited. the geom
ovexlap p't'ase uld be
Westbound�pProach�'`'°�eft-��'
�odified to pxovide one
left-t-uzn�tihrough
lane��ne Shated rnlanes�
tWO rlglit-tu d ovetlap Phase
lane,�nd estboun Since
Providing a�'a daY impacts,
could hau�a�e�cles N'anting to
uthb� ould l�aVe to
txav oxthb�'�nd w
tTa�e t the Ste�en oad n exsection to
olfe R olfe Roaa'Field
goulevaxo 1h ou�dW
a�cess n W exe condU�ted to
obsex�ations ezcen�a$e°f
the existing,P t the
determine U_turn5 a �$ed
vehicles maki�e£leld data was
intexsections. of d1veTtingU"
the imPa�� to Steve�s 56
to estimate vallco Paxk�'�'ay T�sults
tuTns frO1T` allco
ulevaxd•�'e j'�
�nlolfe Roadlv
Cceek B° th the S D)
sha k�at(42.4 se�o�ds a�d L�
Pa
T EIR
AQPLE p R�ppATtNGOPR�GRADt
Tvt1TlGAT10N D10
NiTORiNG AN
�pate
Completedi
Timing Sl$natuxe
TES.�NC� onsible�a'�yl
LS� ASS�ERAZp13 gesp A�tion
S E e�[E M B Q�1tOY111�i
Im lementing PYO�eduYe M
P
�rlitigation
Meas�Ye
Boule�ardl�'��lfe
and Stev
ens CTeek 9$econds and
lntersectio eYa9e accep�ably
Road� Date:
Los D�would oP thbound�" ation
r�p°Sed S�u wolfe See MitigTRANS_6
v,,ith�e p t the S�gna�je�
��reStxictions a tion. Measure Measuxe
intersec See Nlitigation
allco Patk�wOUld be xeduced ,�NS-6•
R°ad� ation�easuTe
The prO�e�t lm�actifican�level. �ee Mitig
than"si �tio�#27'Tantau TRAN�-6•
to a less- 6 At��texse �e pTO�ect
�ANS-� � goad,
ue(Homestead tl a�or
P,ven M' Y Date:
Sponsor shall impleme a eX�luslVe n
TRANS-6 tad Wyuch See Mingat�o
Measure lane�� ��'N�2 Si�atuTe'
ri ht'turn 1hgationN�easure MeasuTe
eastbourid g inteTSection See M
N,ould i�'prO�accepta�le L�'D-�52•6
Mi�igation
Measure ,�NS-2•
operations�� #31 Tantau See
se��nds�� ,�NS-2•
TRANS"17:A�in�ersection�e pro�ect
p,venue�allco PaxkwaY� ation pate:
ent M-it'g �.ti ation
r Shall imple add ex�lusive 5ee NL� g NS_g.
Sponso �NS-2( Sl$na�xe�
sn,l�ich �tionMeasure Measure
Ivieasure U li lax►e), See rtlitig
northb��'nd thro g �rieasure .�p�NS'$•
rove intersection ltl a�ion
"�,ould 1mP OS C�Z�''7 Seco Ta tau See r/I g
o exations to L 1��15-$•
NS-18:At inteTSection#32
goulevazd,tl�e
A enuelStevens Creek ent
all implem 5�
project spons easuTe��ANS�(add
Nl.itigatiori M d x�ght-turn
ex�lusive soutl�boun rove
lane),whlch W�uld im
,� g�R
ApYLE D R eORT1NGpp�EOGg,AAt
MtTtGATtQN n,o�t,�pRtN
G �N
Date
CoxnFletedt
ing Sl�aEure
'tim
onslble raTty(
T�s.�N�� Izesp A�tion
9�QT�MBE RA�o'3 M�nito�ng
pTO��d �ate�
use
lementing a�on
In1p See�tiitig��Ns_9a. Sl�ature:
Mitigat�.or M�asuTe ee Ml,���tior Nleas'�Te Nleas�x
ons�O L�S D(�9'� ect sp�nsOx sl�alation `��'NS 9a
ection pP�Yat� uxsu���tag
onSOT sh�� �,e prol
inters �e�xo�ect sp dilige�`t1y�ANS_�9a, �al
Seconds�• Meas�Ye a pro
TR�NS-19a• ationMeaSUTe ht- seekln� P
ixxtple�e�'tM�tig eas�bound r'g in�ludingCl�of Santa
free ved,
NS-9a�add would imprO�e �1•5 frO�'th�d'if aPpxO �tlo�
�1-Anla�e�'N'oleaationstOL�SD(, Claxar leme�tN��t�g
shall imp T�ANS„19 a.See
�ntexsection p e
ds� Meas�r Meas�re
$e�on or Shall MitigatlOn
T1�e pxO��ct SP��`S
m�o redu�e .�,NS'9a.
'SI�NS-19b� ra
ZpI�I prO� ltiga�Or`
a� t�ie act tM
exp d of tre imp e
e SevexitY Yn�Teasin�tl�
tY� 1�IS-9a�• ciated
u�e�tA d asso
Meas e lp�tae h e ftom 28
,�M.paxt��'P xove
a�l� ,n t woUld imp
�tern 3��excen 1�5.8 se�Onds�
pelcert to F � at��x`
t'�S n of Mitig
oPerat���s� leme�'�atio the
�i�out irnp A�S_9ar h°`Ne�eT N,ould
MeaSUTe� lv1 paxticipation than
crease ln� act to a leSS"
n t Tedu�e the imP
ve�•
si ificantle
Sg
CT �lR
pPPLE C REppRT1NGOQR�GRAni
Mt-►'1GATlOn htONl
TORiNG �ND
�pate
Completed!
�N c. PartY� TiminS Signatute
�sn nsso�RAZOE3' gesponsible
sEeTEMSE Action �ate;
pYOCedure Mon't°nng lti ation
Implementing See M� g
MeasuYe S�e Niitigation
Nleasure Measuxe TRANS"10. Slgnatuxe:
Niitigation �NS_10.
See Mltigation Measure
NS_20:For intersectioiawxex�ce
.�p,.NS-1o•
`t�' Boulevardl ect
Stevens Cxeek S�east),�he Pro}
ExpTessW ay R�n'p ent Mitigation
sporsor sh�l imp 1 �add exclusive
r/ieasuxe'�ANS lane),wh'cl�
northbound left-tur�`
Would impxo LOS DS�52 3 seconds).
opeTations to
utside of the
S�nce this intexsection is o pate.
extino S lur'sd'ctionr�he ation
City of C"p arantee that the See rtlitig
ot cted. Ng-11.
City cann � ould be c°nstru See iri ation Measure Measure 1�I�' Si�ature:
imptovement w act wou�d M� g
d1e imp easure �r�Ng_11.
FoT thlS teason t and unavoidable. See MitigationNl
temain si ifican on#41 ,�NS-11.
.I.�,NS-2�:For interse��280 Ramps�
Lawrence ExpresswaY� " ent
ro ect sponsorehTlZANS 11(add
the p � easur h lane)!
Mltigation Ni d thxou�
exclusive eastboun
xove intersecti°58.3
which would 1�'p table LOS E � �ate:
ppeTations to accep to the entexi.�g
�hls inteYSection is pr�Qx
seconds�•S��'ce extino S oxks stxeet Sl�ature:
Ci �f Cup �e public w into a
oUtside of the �' act would remain ;mpxovemen�
the imp roject sponsoz shall artment shall ensure t e ent with�he
�urisdiction, 1� ation Dep � ment i.s
una�'Oidable. VTA and shall a xeem
�1e p uxsue M g
si ificant a�e pTOject sponSOT shall �iligently p faix shaTe p Y
NS-22, Submitted�0 59
TRANS"22 Measure TIZA Yoval
a a�1�292 215 fair share seekin a
P 9 ards planx�ed in�ludin
co�tTibution tow tha�`,�,ould
�ran$ oxta�ion
ro'ects
JECT �IR
App�E CAMQORTlC36 PROGRAht
►t1N
G �ND RE
A1 O
N1T0
M1TtGpT
lON
�ate
Completedl
Tes,iNC. raTty!
Timin& gignatuxe
p S S O C 1 A gesponsible
{,SA 2013
S E P T�M 8 E R o„itoring Action
Impleme�'ting
proceduTe M �,ement City of Cupertino.
Niitigation Measure W ork
v,rith VTA tO imp
�d,if the trarispoxtarion �fied in
fromvTA, �ement ents lden NS-
of�he a��xoved�shaU imp impxo�em Meas�re'TR,f�
erations MeasuTe �ltigation
improve traffic op Segments and r/Iitiga�on
fxeeway The project 22
��pacted tr�spoxtation T�.�1S-7-2• a ��292,215
e added 1 SR$5 T shall p Y
pro�id cilities:( ) Sponso ed
capacity on parallel£a verting the to VTA towaTds plann
e�t(con ortatio�PxO�e�ts.
EXpress Lane pxo� toll lane to transP
HpV lane to a
existing Vek►icles to
alloW single°��pa�t for a fee)
drive in the H�v lane gan
Mauntain Vi.e`N a�d
between inating the existing
J oSei���elim d I-280
bottleneck o"southbouri
E11VIo�te Road and the
between a�d(3)either
Magdelena A�enueBRT�Stario�`S
Bus gapid Tra�Sit� ertino,or an
proposed within Cup
t ox stuaY
ative impxoveme ent of the
altern xovem
towards the imp ox a paxa11e1
impacted I-ZSO coxxid°x acity.
ould provide ca�p nt
corridor that`^' tion am
�Q fait share contTibuultation with
was calculated in cons ro}ect's
VTA staff based on the p th o�'the
co�txibution to PrO�ect grow
impacted freewa�'Seg�1e�t.
the EXPress Lane,
nlikely�hat ould be 60
It is u ative px��ect w
BRT or a�tetn ro ect
implemented prior to P � . xove-
d t1�at the$e�m
com �etiox��
T E1R
Ri pGP A p RgPOK'�ING RR�GRArt
MtTiGATIO
N �t�NIT�
�pate
Completed!
Timing glgnatuxe
�rES, �n�' onsib1ePaY��
A s s o cti A �esp p,c�,ion
ySA 2��3 p
SEYTEMBER Qn1t01111D
Im leme�ting PYO�edure �
p
Measure
Mitig,ation
ce the impa�t to a
ments N,ould T�du addition,
ificant�eVe�'��he pate:
less-than�a�o�ontrol over �n�oin$until the 9
of t�iese ml�igation re:
the C�ty a�t to the Wotks �o�ths folloWing Sl�,atu
implementah°n the imp �e public a�cy°f t�'e
thexefoz�ould remain e�t sh�l review and £u11 occup
measuresf onsor shall Depaxtm foT the three pro�ect site.
Seg�ents ,�e pxo}ect sp lans
freeway d unavoidable• e a pro�e p
ate): �' t detailed thTee p eX�t lanes and
si. ifican�� d p,ltern 5ubm� lans foT teft-�rn
T�NS_23(Secon itted{O �ons�ction P ciated educational
�ect sponsor shall be eXlm anes ��eXlt lanes that asso
pxo if left- followin� matetials.
�Nolfe Road e �
constiru�t thxee left-tu �clude�' City shal
the PTO�e��Site to e�em ihon� e
measures are ents� ager In add' th
fxom o�o£si�' e mo�thly
all of the following t1} �,OCatt avemen� and after
and p review th �oTts,
implemen�ed' er��lud�gb"t Striping mo��toxing r� port,
Sl S,sha11 b ends �Xlt oniroring re
e tliat inaicate t e
Clear slgr'ag of eacr m thxee
. ead 8�' leg of each
to overh tion whethez the
notlimi��d destlnanon destina eTate
to indicate tne er to dete�mine o
installed es in ord lane• left-tu�'exit la�eS es axe
of the three exit lan arkings I£the lan
each e�hanges. �2�Lane�` e changes a�Ceptably• erate
e unsafe lan oad, that lan ined to oP
discourag e axt W olfe R indicating itted. not determ the City shall
� Ea��i�a� a axe no�Pezm of�losed ptably, �aTe
the drj°ewaY an e cleazly tion�s} ���e le to pre
bet�ez dge A°en�e,sh�leb direcrional (3}Loca �amexas t� require APp lement a
ptun stri �T�it video at the plans f ot and imp exit
alnted � ds to exatians c�on to tWO left-tuzn
maxked bY� anon legen lane recotd Qp redu
an�destin of ea�h ction•
arrows in�erse laneS.
indicate tY`e destination r Shall
double lineS°r �e�TOject spanso
and ta indica�.e bY aTk�ngs that educational 61
ropxiate n' of la�• �lso develop
�hang nK laneS ls �t sp�'°x ShaU materials ex lainin tY'e
.�e pro}e fox a
� follow��' measuxes
���d tre
Ap O�ECT ElR
YLE CAMp�RTING YROGRAhI
ANp REY
MITIGATjON �SON�T�R��G
j�ate
Cpmpletedt
Tim;ng Si�atute
pSSOCtATES. �NC' �
�eSponsible PartY
s�YTE�ws�R zo�3 Arnan
Implementing
procedure Monitoring
Niitigation Measure Veway
proper use of the d'-�
of nine mon��'S from eXlt lanes
�nrithout weaving
txia�peTiod iflcate of amon�lanes.
ce of the fixst cert�u�l�ing�d from
issuan for the Main �addirion,
occupan�y occup��'of the fixst q_
closed-circuit video
�S Traffic ee eXtending t°a 11
shall install e�t�the Ciry emplO� exiod aftex�
cameras link �ontinuously mo�t�tTial p roject,
pperatiox�s Centex tO e�ts at tre an�y of the p
cle mavem occup xo ect
�ecoxd vehi ana along the City,at p l
pTOject drive���' Txained � �ost,shall Tetain
oa d. Sp onsor s e l to
y�lolfe R endent personn
SoUthbound ae enden�from indep eek,
who are in P eriodically on�e a w
persor�1el, onsoT,shall p periodical1Y� of at least
the pro�ect SP footage at the fot the duratior� �o_hour
the video ro�ide a ANI and°ne
Teview e City,and P two review
of th month tO{he PM peak peTiods)
direction of each �S report e at the
reppzt at the end ent video footag � walfe
otks Departm al l.ane
p"bl'c w noting intersection ar'axe a
sh�l dOCUment unsafe oT illeg
observed� Road an�pxep
changeS(violations) vialarions and monthly Tep�rt
ts�aused by documenting unsafe or
acciden �he professional
�,,�hetheT,in illegal lane chan�es
noting the in�ePendent ts caused
�udg�1ent of violadons observed,acciden
�e observed �hat e ch�geSr
obsex'ver, Safery pTOb�em by unsafe lan
�f so, �he obsexved
consri�te a dressed and, �,ahether tes a
should be ad to address behavioY consti� ould
measures roblem that sh
recommending safery p ,if so,
them• tim�following the be addzessed and
If,at anY mending measuxes to 62
' trial period l�s�ed recom
e month easures address tben''
��� - of the m
imple�entation xeven{
aboVe a°not substantiall
2 QR�� pGRA�
E
Ap4LE C REppRT}NG p�
�,TtGAT��N DtONITORIN� �ND
pate
letedl
Comp
a�Ure
Tvning Si�
pCtATES' lN�.
onsible Partyt
ReS A�tion
LS A A M B�g 2 Q 13 Monito�ng
SEQTE
Implementing�'YO�edut
Measut�
�qitigation
al opix"On
tl�e Profession the
violations�ln ent obsexvex and
e Whe�hex
of the indepen hall detex��`
the Cl�`�' es are tequlxed'or
C't�'' easux ustbe
additional m bez of laneS I"
tre num Monitorin�
�,�,retheY two exitlanes•
to ontY`S
Tedu�ed til nine of t�'e
shall contin�e� an�y
following fUll occuP
ox$rall
pro�ect. �e pro�ect sp°�'S Date�
. lo�ree educationof the
ction prior to entexi��
de�relop emp the Satisfa use of tY'e Signatuxe:
ro er into a s�reet
materials,to e p vi�g ,���ublic w�xks
explain�ng�h � vie� and vemen�
without�`'ea in.�Px°
City, Shall ent shall re ent�
ax�veway exitlaxles onsor Depaxtm �he agreem ban
lanes• The prO�ect sp roVe plans for dl�g ds�T
among onsor Sk,all e detailed d shall �FP easu=e� in��u
ect sP pTO°id ��S an mitigation n' ot1neY Suxety to
S_24:The pxO� �,b�und co�stxuctiox�P ltiga�'an tee the uxe,
TT�N ct the m S�aTan �eas
dedicated SOU tau constxu Yovide ation
provide a ��e at the Ta�' ox sha l l p ri,iti g onsox
�gh{_�uzn intetsection• meaS�xe, �ing fox the PrO�ect sp
p,venueNallco ParkWay adequate fun ction of ��e pl�s
d consttu shall h
design a�' z„easuxe. approvedby the
the mltigation C1 Date:
prior to entezin
,�e public W°xks 63
�e ro ect S
onsoT shall
onSOT
shall
� ToeCtis
,�p,NS-25:'T1,
LSA ASSOCIATES. INC. APPLE CAM1IPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
SEPTEMBER 2013 MITIGATION 11lONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRADI
Responsible Party/ Date
Mitigation Measure Implementing Procedure Timing Completed/
Monitoring Action
Signature
widen the northbound I-280 off-ramp diligently pursue Mitigation Department shall review into a street
at Wolfe Road to accommodate two Measure TRANS-25, plans for the mitigation improvement Signature:
lanes.The project sponsor would including seeking approval measure and facilitate agreement with the
need to work with City staff,VTA, from Caltrans,and,if discussions with Caltrans and City of Cupertino,
and Caltrans to plan,design and approved,shall implement VTA in order to implement the project sponsor
construct the widening with all Mitigation Measure this measure. shall have plans
funding provided by the project TRANS-25.The project approved by the
sponsor.The off-ramp is under sponsor shall provide City which includes
Caltrans jurisdiction.Therefore,the detailed construction plans bonds or other
City of Cupertino cannot ensure the and shall construct the surety to guarantee
implementation of the proposed mitigation measure,or shall the mitigation
mitigation measure;thus the impact is provide adequate funding measure.In the
considered significant and to design and construct event that the
unavoidable. either(1)the identified project sponsor can
mitigation measure or; (2) demonstrate to the
an alternate improvement satisfaction of the
which would mitigate the Public Works
impact to the satisfaction of Department that,
the City of Cupertino's despite their best
Public Works Department. efforts,Caltrans will
not approve the
identified mitigation
measure,then the
project sponsor shall
provide the
maximum funding
to the City of
Cupertino to be held
in escrow until an
64
E�R
C�MepRT�NG 4ROGRAh'
�QyL�� gEC
R�NG A
M�T�GATjoN n,o�l�o Dat�
Com121�ted!
ze
�lmitl� Slgx�ati�
le Paxty�
,�espo�sri�AGtl�r
�r.T ES'�N c �o�ito al�eznate t
Pto�edu=e
iz�Pr°vezne to t�`e
�SA ASMBER Zp�3
S�,YTE It,�plernex�tin�, Sat�sfact peTn�a's
C�rY°�wo�ks
lvleas p"bll� e�t�S
uze
Mltigatlon Depaztm S�b�e�t to
zQ�ed, �S of
te r Quizer'�`ez`od
�exx�`e�t C e
G� 66pp1<d�'
Sectio�ds N,i11be
'�`e�ed to rhe
eas
zel onsible agen
To pe tr �xO�at ls
e
ax�
ap orO a�ed,as�'
Pt geX�ess fun
a�`��ed�o tY`e
YeTO e�t S onsor• pate�
entezin$
Prjpz�� a�Te�
stree� 51��
intO a ent
e�,ub1i��°r�Teview imk�YOVemt
en�
s1�a11 � aztme�'t sb iti a�°n a�,reem bo�ds oz
s ��"S°x tion � p z the�� � clud'ng
xo�ect p inga l�,s f� fa�ilitate a�d ix� 5�TetY to
�ep uT5ueM p eand �ax�s otllez e
srall ently p S 26� meaSUT witl�Ca� ent antee th
ect sp°�`S�X ramF dilig �ze.�p,l� � a Proval disc�ssio� to i�'►Plen� �az atio�'�`eaSUYe,
,�e pro1 j,2Sp off- NLeaS Seeking p in Qtdez �itlg �t Spoz��x
TRP,NS�26' o�t>>b�ux�d oda�e two �,clUdix�g �s,�`d,�f ent v�A easuxe' tl�e px°�e lans
�,�,�den�Y,e s ad tio a���lrzz��v.ro�ld fxo�`�altz S 11 izx�plen1 tY>is�` a11 ha`je
wolfe�° e�tsp�nsO VTA� zoVed, h easuxe sh 65
at es.`�`e pT�� itY�C i t y S�aff, a�d a�ti g,a t�°�`�e p r o ject
ln�edtowozk�`' desigr`' ���5-2b• xo�lde
S to plan, witr aU Sk,a�l p la�s
and CaltC�the t''Ilde�n ne P=°�e�t off- sp°',vso d constzuctian
�o�stzu Toyie��of.tY`e f xe�a off� detaile
fund'ng p
co
spo�°o a on�m°date a Se
xaz�c�
LSA ASSOCIATES. INC. APPLE CAM1IPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
SEPTEMBER 2013 MITIGATION DIONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAD►
Responsible Party/ Date
Mitigation Measure Implementing Procedure Timing Completed/
Monitoring Action
Signature
ramp lane and shoulder would likely and shall construct the approved by the
require the removal of existing mitigation measure,or shall City.In the event
landscaping in front of the soundwall. provide adequate funding that the project
The feasibility of this mitigation to design and construct sponsor can
measure cannot be assured and the either(1) the identified demonstrate to the
off-ramp is under Caltrans mitigation measure or; (2) satisfaction of the
jurisdiction.Therefore,the City of an alternate improvement Public Works
Cupertino cannot ensure the which would mitigate the Department that,
implementation of the proposed impact to the satisfaction of despite their best
mitigation measure and the impact is the City of Cupertino's efforts, Caltrans will
considered significant and Public Works Department. not approve the
unavoidable. identified mitigation
measure,then the
project sponsor shall
provide the
maximum funding
to the City of
Cupertino to be held
in escrow until an
alternate
improvement
satisfactory to the
City of Cupertino's
Public Works
Department is
approved,subject to
the requirements of
Government Code
Section 66001(d).
66
I.SA ASSOCIATES. INC. APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
SEPTEMBER 2013 MITIGATION DIONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRADI
Responsible Party/ Date
Mitigation Measure Implementing Procedure Timing Completed/
Monitoring Action
Signature
The funds will be
released to the
responsible agency
once the project is
approved and
programmed,with
any excess funds
returned to the
ro'ect s onsor.
TRANS-27:The southernmost The project sponsor shall The Public Works Prior to entering Date:
driveway to the Cupertino Village implement the closure of Department shall help into a street
shall be closed.With this mitigation vehicular access to the facilitate these discussions improvement Signature:
the impact would be less-than- southernmost driveway and shall verify that the street agreement,
significant. (Wolfe Road),based on City improvement plans reflect the including bonds or
facilitation between the mitigation measure adopted. other surety to
Cupertino Village property guarantee the
owner and project sponsor. mitigation measure,
the project sponsor
shall have plans
approved by the
Ci
TRANS-28:To lessen the impact the The project sponsor shall The Public Works Prior to entering Date:
project sponsor shall install a"Yield submit detailed plans for Department shall review and into a street
to Peds" sign that is activated by a the mitigation measure and approve detailed plans for improvement Signature:
pedestrian push button.Additionally, construct the mitigation the mitigation measure. agreement,
the project shall install a high measure. including bonds or
visibility crosswalk(i.e.,with ladder other surety to
striping)at the east leg of the Wolfe guarantee the
Road/Pro'ect Access intersection to miti ation measure,
67
US Z pR�� OGR�h
E
APYLE C g�p�RTiNG eR
��1D
MtT`GAT�ON rt01'll'��R�xG
p�te
Completedl
artY�
Tim�n$ Sl�atuxe
�N�� ReSP°nsl nle A�tior
�SA Assac[n�o�i�' T��eCtSpO�s�r
MBER Ma„itori g the p
s�.r T E lementing PYOCedu e shall ha°e Plans
Imp a�pto�ed bY��1e
Niitiga{ion�'1'easuxe City.
more D�te�
make the crosswa�e�ts would entexi�'Y
Y'elp PT to a S t Sl�a�xe.
tre tree
pxomi�eY`t.�'act,but w°uld h n- � ublic��rks in t
en to a less- e P teview roven1en
less the lm� act a��ess all in�P t
�itig,ate the imp r shall DepaT�ent sh ation a�rQemen,
ede$trian �e�xo}ect sp�nso �i.tig ds or
t level as p �Ivlitigation plans fox tY►e d�ngbon
Sl�,ifican eded. ursu and f acilitate inclu
woUld stillbe im Ce the pedestxian diligently p NS_29, measure• CaltYans in otl�ex s�ret}'ta
ith
NS-29:To enh�' en tY`e NJ.easuxe TRA � approval discussi°ns lement tl�is �arantee th easuxei
f tgA ent and less in�luding Seelcl a d,if prdez tO 1mY �tigation�`
six I-2g� oz
environrn act at tha ro�ect Caltrans, lement toject sp�ns
pedesttian iz"p �oa ,the P from Shall imp��NS_ �neasure• the p s
S�,vithwolfe en11ai'ced ap�r°"ed� easure Sh�lha�e pla�
xs onsor shall pr�vide �rosswalks. �/Iitigaeio�o,ec�sponSOr shall appYOVed b�Y the t
p �t all rarnP Ix�the e°e�
alks Y-28Q e�t 29.Th �detailed C��'' ect
�zOSSw foT the the 1?xO1 To�ide S ar,d sl�all �hat the�raj
Additionally� xam�� d p
lan
o�' on can
Sauthb°und looP �onstruct,an �onstructi{he m�tiga�ion sor
onsot shall design, xove t1�aard construct oT Sh vide
all px° d monstxate to� e
s wing to imp Stan of t�'e
�d the��1.10 an lndustry n�easure� Caltrans Satisfa�tion
Tta 35�ph roadwaY funding to d W oxks
Sl�h�distan�e design an public ent that,
of 25�feet£o adequatct el heT(1�t�ie Departmhe�.x best
ae: ce o� constxu iti anOn despite �,,ill
in�lu eXlsting fe�' at has identified m �' �teTnate Caltrans
Replacing ,with one�' or;�2)�` effoxts,
• measure hich w°uld xo�e tk'e
overcros5in�, entw the n°t app d xniriganon
be transPaTe��yf taix�ing i�`pro�em imPact{Q ldent�E�e tl�e
tter er o f �ngate the e� then
and ma��' ublic
��rn of�h �easure'
. Txirnm"�g onnoYtrwest bound tisfaction
vegetarioz� d�_28�S�uth Sa S epartmer`' 68
thew°lfe�°a work D
loop°n�ram�� m�Ve�he
the ramp t° d
. �edeSl�ning er npzth�an
v�ralk furth to
ctoss avement le end
. Add'n a
pPPLE CAMPUS 2 PR�PROG1tA�
M�71GATION M�N�T�RiNG AND REPQRTiNG
LSA ASSOC[ATES, �N�� Date
sEpTE"'s�R xo13 Completedl
Responsible Party/ Timing Si�ature
Implementing
Pxocedure Monitorin$Action
Mitigation Measure project sponsor shall
pxovide the
maximum funding
indicate pedestrian crossing. to the City of
The treatments would lessen the Cupertino to be held
impact,but would not mitigate the in escrow until an
impact to a less-than-significant level, alternate
as the increased vehicular volumes im�ro�,ement
would still exist.Further,the satisfactory to t�'e
feasibility of this mitigation measure Cl�,of Cupertino`s
cannot be assured as the on-ramp is Public W°T�s
under Caltrans j�z1 of1Cu ertino �epartment is
Therefore,the City P approved,subject to
cannot ensure the implementation of the requirements of
the mitigation measure. Government Code
Section 6b001(d).
'I'he funds will be
released to the
responsible agency
once the project is
approved and
programmed,with
any excess funds
returned to the
ro ect s onsor.
Prior to entering
Date:
'�he Public Works into a street S��a�ze:
�e pxo}ect sponsor shall impro�rement
e ro ect sponsor shall Department shall review
TRANS-30:Th p J Submit detailed plans ]ans to implement this a reement,
upgrade transit stops along Wolfe pTepared in accordance miti ation measure and
Road betwe�e�nd Homest ad Road,on with the re uirements of
Boulevard 69
APPLE CAh�pUS 2 PROJECT EIR
MITIGAT�ON
rLONIT�R��G AND REPORT�NG PROGRAAI
LSA ASSOCIATES. �N�� Date
SEYTEMBER 2013 leted/
COmp
geSponsible Partyl Timing Si�ature
Irnplementing
Proceduxe Manitorin$Action
M�tigation Measure including bonds or
facilitate discussions with othex surety to
VTA and the City of VTA in ordeT to implement
between Wolfe Road guarantee the
Vallco Parkway Cu ertino for the t�s measure.
and on Tantau p mitigation measure,
and Tantau Avenue, development�OQlfe Road the project sponsor
Avenue between Stevens Creek S�pps along shall have plans
Boulevard and Hoinestead Road. between Stevens Cxeek approved by the
Boulevard and Homestead Ci�.
Road,on Vallco Parkway
between Wolfe R�a ond
Tantau Avenue,
Tantau Avenue between
Stevens Creek Boulevard
and Homestead Road•T11e
pro}ect sponsor shall
provide standard VTA
shelters as shown in the
approved p�.a�s.�£the
project sponsor opts to
provide enhanced-design .
shelters with amenities,it
shall provide a p�an subject
to the approval of the
Director of Public Works
and the VTA and shall fund
the maintenance of the
trar�sit stops�At any time,
the project sponsor may
replace the shelters with
standard�1`rA shelters at
the s onsor's ex ense,
70
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. � APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECi EIR
SEPTEMBER 2013 MITIGATION DIONITORING AND REPORTINC PROGRAM
Responsible Party/ Date
Mitigation Measure Implementing Procedure Timing Completed/
Monitoring Action
Signature
subject to the approval of
VTA.If shelters are
replaced with standard
VTA shelters,the sponsor
would not be required to
maintain them.
TRANS-31:Implement Mitigation See Mitigation Measures See Mitigation Measures See Mitigation Date:
Measures PLAN-2 and PLAN-3.The PLAN-2 and PLAN-3. PLAN-2 and PLAN-3. Measures PLAN-2
multi-use paths and the pedestrian and PLAN-3. Signature:
improvements proposed as part of the
project would lessen the impact,but
would not mitigate the impact to a
less-than-significant level as the
elimination of existing pedestrian
facilities would still occur.
TRANS-32:Implement Mitigation See Mitigation Measures See Mitigation Measures See Mitigation Date:
Measure PLAN-2 and PLAN-3.The PLAN-2 and PLAN-3. PLAN-2 and PLAN-3. Measures PLAN-2
multi-use paths and bicycle and PLAN-3. Signature:
improvements proposed as part of the
project would lessen the impact,but
would not mitigate the impact to a
less-than-significant level as the
elimination of existing bicycle
facilities would still occur.
TIZANS-33:There are no feasible No No implementing/monitoring No Date:
mitigation measures to restore transit implementing/monitoring procedure required. implementing/monit
access to Route 81 for The Hamptons procedure required. oring procedure Signature:
residents,therefore the impact is required.
considered si nificant and
71
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
SEPTEMBER 2013 MITIGATION 1110NITORING AIVD REPORTING PROGRADI
Responsible Party/ Date
Mitigation Measure Implementing Procedure Monitoring Action Timing Completed/
Signature
unavoidable.
TRANS-34:There are no mitigation See Mitigation Measure See Mitigation Measure See Mitigation Date:
measures to reduce the impact to a TRANS-32. TRANS-32. Measure TRANS-32.
less-than-significant level. Signature:
Implementation of Mitigation
Measure TRANS-32 would lessen the
impact,but not to a less-than-
si nificant level.
TRANS-35:Implement Mitigation See Mitigation Measure See Mitigation Measure See Mitigation Date:
Measure TRANS-9b. TRANS-9b. TIZANS-9b. Measure TRANS-9b.
Signature:
J. NOISE
NOI-1:The project sponsor shall The project sponsor shall The Community Prior to the issuance Date:
implement the following measures at ensure the following Development Department of grading,building,
the project site during all demolition measures are undertaken shall: or occupancy Signature:
and construction activities,subject to prior to the initiation of (1)Review the project permits and
the approval of the City: construction: construction plans and verify periodically during
• The project sponsor shall ensure (1)Construct sound walls that the provisions listed in project construction
the construction of a 15-foot high along the project property Mitigation Measure NOI-1 activities.
temporary sound wall along the lines,as specified in are included.
project's property line adjacent to Mitigation Measure NOI-1. (2�Review and approve all
sensitive land uses. (2)Submit a construction construction truck routes.
o A temporary sound wall shall management plan for City (3)Maintain the name and
be constructed along the eastem review,which identifies contact information for the
project property line to block construction site layout noise disturbance coordinator
the line-of-sight from the single- (trailers,storage of on file throughout the
family residential land uses on materials,truck routes,and construction period,and
Howard Drive and Meadow edestrian aths), ensure that the contact is
72
T g�R
�p4LE�REppK'��N�'OYR�GR�'Fl
MtTiGAT�ON ht0
N►T�R1NG AN
pate
Completed!
Tim�n& 5i�,natuxe
1,.le raY�yl
C[ATES, �NC• ��$1V
ReSp Action
�EpTE�gER �8j3 ��n1�OT111g
Iml'lementing,PrOCedure
to resl�ents ana
M�as�re d accessible loyees
1Vlitigat�oY` tes,�' �ocal emp site
tru�tion r�'i es to C�)Con�uct period�c
cons easur hout the
nstnlction Teductio�m throug
all to re
ue to pT�lect�o orth �'Oise e and durin$ction insPections exiod ensu
A ea o�the east side of N be�mplem d�onstzu construction p oise
ax �,is s�u"a demolition ropxiate�
Tantau A�en U e• from t re t r a t a p P easu r e s a re
all be set back activities. a�oise xedu�nOn�` the site.
wrall sl� Uch as �pesig�ate dinatar t� lm�lemented on
property line as Y'1' or prolect t3� �e�ooz
to still allow f �cur. disturban d reso�Ve noise
feasible activities{o° throughout the
ction all sh�l be receivlain s
�u
A e�p $O�d w Sputhe�' comp ctio�pexiod,axt
oraxY
° cted along theto b l o�k the con$tru
e name an
constru line rovide�' �o the
� Y ,�eHamptons p formation
ro ect propert ta�t in
p ht from con
line-of-sig areas in �lry.
conS�TUCtion
to proje�t of the
the S�uth�est port�u d W all shall
project site.Th'S S et�Y
be Set back from the Pro�
asible to still
line as much as fe �tion
for prole�t�onstxu
allow o�cur•
d vv all sha11 be
activities tO Sou�the nOrthetn
o p,tempoTary
constYU�ted alonK
erry line to block t�'e
project prop sing�e-
o£-sig,ht£xom{�Le eTties
lix�e- tial prOp
famil�'residen estead Rpad to
nortll of East Hom
areas in tY1e
pTO,e�t�onstiruction roje�t
ortion of t�'e p �3
northem P �,aall shallbe set
site.This SO'��d Toperty line as
back from�'e p till a11ow�ox
much as feasible�o s
�QOS � Q G�yR�GR��
ApPLE C REyORTLN
M'T`GAT�ON d10C3lTORING AND
Date
ComPletedl
Tin,in& Sl�ature
o�slb�e�,artyl
pClATES^1NC.
ges Action
SEYT"`BER Z�j3 Manito�n�
Impleme�'ting I'r��edu=e
�eaSUYe
Mitiga{ion
•ect constru�tion activities to
PrO�
occux. �a�tar shall
�e�TO�e�t co� txuction liaison
' designate a�O� onsible fQz
that Sl'all be xesp local com'
onding to any ction x�oise.
resp ts abo�t co�stru e tre
p�aix' Shall determl�` ts(e•g''
.�e liaison �o�se�Q�p1ain
�o£th� uffle1�and
�a'is early,bad m
$taxting to� able�,easures to
institute reasO�` A telephone
ct the pTOblem• shallbe
number for the liaisori
osted at the
�cuouS�Y p uction site
co�'s� of the canstr
etex a��ad��cent
peTim
�d pTa��ded to Tlor to
pTOpeT�y°�nt o co�stxuction•
�ox,ln,encem tra�tox shall
�,e prOlect��n struction
� e�sure that all con
a �Q�Tiate
equipmen�h�s pp uffling and
h�luality noise w�ch
hl�' t devices, talried
abateme�' ezly�`altt
w ould b�ati p rimes S��h �4
d Used eTation• tl�e
�` ent is in°� to
e U�pm S1�a11,
eTo�e�t�ontractox tiona�'
�t nt feasible,Pla�me�t so that
cons�x"��l�n e
T gIR
AppL�D REYpRTtNG Y��GRAM
ri►,r��ilN�' AN
ri O
m�T�°AT��n
�ate
Completedl
ing Slg�atute
' 'tim
onsible pa�tY
T Es,�n c. ReS�' Action
S�YT��B E ftA2 0�y �orito�n$
lementin��'1O�QduTe
Inlp
Measute
Nlitiga{ion
ected a�`r aY
olse is dir arest
emi�.ted n xe�eptors ne
Se�sitive
fzom enerating
the projec�site t naise'g
EXtezior p o�activities ti�a
• constxucti �tio�an
�onstru itted
gxading�onl Shallbe P xesldenrially
ex
demol�n £ee� anY
of �tween the
within 75�
Za�ed pTOpex�'�a d 8:0�p.n''on
l�oUxs
o f S�a�a between the 1'O'�xs
W eekdaY a�d�:0�P'�`'�hall be
of 9:Q�a•�`' uch w�rk
.�,veeke�'ds.N�S �e,Ne`�'
exx��tted oY`h°lidays�� .
emorialDa9` �
`Lear sDae'�eDay���Das
Xi�an Sgl�'n�D�y� xOQed by the
t as pp
pay�,e"cep De�elopn'en� may be
Co�munity V atian Co�txol
D1TeCtoT.ANoise
the N°ise
obtained fx ea r occuo�s�e�on
tzu
pfficer�temP°xaxy�
Specific er �5
actiCties. a�tivities,°�S a11be
ons�u�tion
o t�ons�tuction� nless
than stxee holidays'v
pzohibited°�`
tre C'�,of
tC�y e t�o S�� rttix�e
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
SEPTEMBER 2013 MITICATION 1110NITORING AND REPORTINC PROGRAIII
Responsible Party/ Date
Mitigation Measure Implementing Procedure Monitoring Activn Timing Completed/
Signature
maximum permissible noise
level standards.
NOI-2:The project sponsor shall The project sponsor shall The Public Works Prior to entering Date:
resurface the following roadway resurface the roadway Department shall verify that into a street
segments with RHMA-O or similar segments identified in the repaving has been improvement Signature:
quiet pavement: Mitigation Measure NOI-2 undertaken on the identified agreement,
East Homestead Road,from North with RHMA-O or similar roadway segments.The City including bonds or
Wolfe Road to North Tantau quiet pavement,or shall maintain this pavement. other surety to
Avenue;and reimburse the City for the guarantee the
• North Wolfe Road,from cost of doing so. mitigation measure,
Pruneridge Avenue to the I-280 the project sponsor
northbound ramps. shall have plans
approved by the
Ci
K. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND SUSTAINABILITY
Tliere are no si izi icafit Greenliouse Gas Emissions or Sustainabilit inz acts.
L. AIR QUALITY
AIR-1:Consistent with guidance from The project sponsor The Community Prior to the issuance Date:
the BAAQMD,the following actions shall ensure that the air Development Department of grading,building,
shall be required in relevant pollution control measures shall verify that the air or occupancy Signature:
construction contracts and identified in Mitigation pollution control measures permits and
specifications for the project: Measure AIR-1 are identified in Mitigation periodically during
• All exposed surfaces(e.g.,parking incorporated into the Measure AIR-1 are project construction
areas,staging areas,soil piles, construction plans for the incorporated into project activities.
graded areas,and unpaved access project and implemented at construction plans.In
roads)shall be watered two times the project site. addition,the City shall
per day. conduct periodic site
All haul trucks transporting soil, inspections throughout the
sand,or other loose material off- construction eriod to ensure
76
R
Meus Z,NG�eRQGRAh1
AQeL��.yp REY���
g'NG A
M�T���������N���
pate
Coinpleted►
Slgratu=e
'timing
le paYtiyl
�esponsib A�tion
��A ���$�R�� 3 �N�.
Monito�ng
gEeT EM eznenting�'TO�edu=e �Cripzz per'�uxes
ase ImPl tl�o lu�o��o��l�e�ted a�the
Meas p e beirg imP
�itigatio�' ar
pzO,e�t Slte
Shall be�°�ez T dlxt txacked'OU e
Site mud o as Shallb
. p,ll vis��a,a ent publi�YO�wez�a�uum
o Q�oVed USl egs e�1P St on�e pez
t Sweep owet
stxee�e use of dzy p
da� ing'S px�h�b on n�'aved
. SAlI vehicle speeds d to 1�miles
S Shall be lin�lte
z°z hous��'p�'�dri�ewa`�s,aY'd
� dv�rays� d s1�a11be
, p,11 r�a S to be pa�e Qssible•
eN,allc n as P �S on
Sla leted as S��allbe lald So
comp sb uriless
guildingpaaftex grading Used•
e
as,�oSSiboT So��binder ent ldling
Seeding n equip�' e1tl�er b9
. Co�st�ctio m�ri��Zed �ot
When
es��`�lb� ert off urn
tin� �,�pm ax�rn
shUttingT ea��ng thete(as
it�uSe� 2 minu voxx�e
time to alifo�'ia aix
id1irY, d bY t1�e C Tltle 13,
ulrz easuTe de of ��
xto;cs con�z°lof CalifQx��a C���ge
gection 2�g� C1eaT
ovCa a�£ox cons���tion
tte�.'latipz�
shallbe p� ess poin�s•
ex��s�al ed
,�aorkerS at all a�� ulp� �n
����Qns ta�a�a Xo ex1
' be ma�ri
T g{R
ApPLE CAhtY�RTtNG PR�GRAM
M��.�GATION TIOI't1TORiN
G �`N� RE
�ate
Co�pletedi
Timing Sl�attitx'e
T Es. ,N c� ansible raTtY�
S E y T E M B E RAZ�13 �eSp Action
Imp�ementing
pioceduxe Monitorin�
Mitiga�ion
�rT,easuTe
in accordan�e`'�ith the
xex,s Speci£ications•A11
�,anufactu �heckedbY a
eaulpme�t sliall be ined
�ana detexm
certi£ied mech� TopeT�ond�tion
to be�nT'ing in p
xioT to opeTation• ost a
p l���t shall p
.�e pxo}ect apP �,,rieh�e
• publicl�yn�ri�be�nd petson to
teleph of Cupertino
contact at the Ci�' Z'his
dust complaints• ts
Te�arding ond to cQmplain
person shall xesp a�tio�within
and{�e correcrive
AC�M�s pk`one
48 hours.The BA �isible to
numbex shall also be licable
ensuxe comp�i�`Ce W�th aPP
re�ulations• Surfaces shall be
osed �en�Y�'deauate
. All e'� fzeq
vaatexed a�a inimun`SO'1
to maintain�' eTCent•MoistuTe
moisture°f�2 p
t can be�ex�fied by lab
conte les or a mpistuTe Pr°be.
samp rading,andlox
. All eX�a�ation,g allbe
demolition activitieS SY` e w�nd
N,hen a�erag �8
Suspended
Speeds exceed 2p m�h' fast-
round cover(e•&•�
vQ�etatiae g xass seed)or
. �arive
erm��ati�
2Q ��E�GRA�
App�'�D R QQR�tNC' eR
R'NG A
M`�,GAT��N �M�N���
Uate
Conl�letedl
S1g�atUYe
.t;�,inY,
1e paxty�
�S �eso°ti ri g Action
1N�� M
LSA ASgB�AA?��3 P=o�eduze
�E Y��� 111ti��Bme�tll��
�easuYe
Mitig,�t'°r.
that�ffer dust
eY lan shallbas Soo
ts
�th ation�'easuxes aYeas n
�itig d1S�rUed
pla�ted in and watexed
as possibla elY�til�e�etat���ls
zi �e of
apP blshed• c�z a gTa�j,d_
est e Slmv�tax�eOUS� ,
• � n, raain�, �' a�ti�ities
eX�avatio onstxu�tion e time
on
dls�e S me aTea;�o�e extent Sed
°� lirNted' S�,al1 be p�'a
sl�allbe eta�ount of ais'�tbed
feasible,activi
to xedu�e�,Y� o�e time.
Surf a�es at a�a eav�41"er�t,be
. P,11���ks areit rires�Sha11 th
to�eavix�� e
in�lud'ng th x�ox
`,,jashed°ff� tYOI
Sardb gs°�°�h�z
er�slOn c��
a be��stalled to
. Shall ublic e
n�eas"zes z„x�off tO p slop
pYevent Sllt vvitll a
aw ys ftom Sites
zOa t i t�,a��per�en�,ic '19
grea vo�atile Qxg tings
Use l�w RpG��Qa ts
. oU d(i.e., Teau1Te�ez�
z�
�omQ d tl,e lo�al Rule 3:
be`I lation 8,
(i.e.,Re� �al Coatings}' easlble,
A���heem X1�um eXtent f
, To
CT gLR
AQp4 Np REp04T1NGO4R�GRAnt
OR�N
G A
niON
iT
MiT�GA����
Date
Compiete�
in�, S��►atuxe
Tim
Slble raxty�
oC►A�ES. tN�� gesl'O" �,ction
SEp�EMB�g 2�j3 'PTO�edure
1Vlanito�ng
Ixnplementing
MeaSUYe
M,itigat�,°n
men�,d�esel
all const��tion ea"'p allbe
d eneratoxs sh
t A�ailable
trucks�a�'wltl�Bes lssion
Cori� Tec1�n°loX nd pNl•
reduc�ions of 1`� eXtent£easible,
� ent
, To the n'aX'n1s S all use eQu pm
all co�tractox �ost zecen
that meets p'RB Sdazd off-zoa
£OT
tion Stan
�eTtifica
dlesel en�,ines•
rea�y du�Ytl�e fol�oti'in�, dlesel"
dm g t ens�xeequl��,enr used
. EX��u
eau�ezed off-xoad „T�ex 2„
E�A
po�' d
eets U.S• dsl an
ox►-site�' tandar
e�d�aust emission S � ed N'ith
tl�at engines R$eLe�ep3 Vexl£ied
Califoznla A CQn{rol
esel E�'ission l���ude diesel
Dl �es� (w���`Qx axe�eztified
Stxateg late filteYS) ».�ler 4
paxt'�� U.S•EPA late
to meet��e dard for paTticu at
� m t th
f� Stan ex�
�tetim �
�,attex emiss�°ns�E�Tier 2,�
U.S•EP p' ds but 8�
will meet Standax
ission
exl�aus tbe equipped`nrit�ed Dlesel
�n,ill n� „L,eve13�e� ,� Sha11
CalifoTn�a Co�txo�S�ateg5'
�,missiox�
be 1im►te
d to:
LSA ASSOC►ATES, INC. APPLE CAM1IPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
SEPTEMBER 2013 MITIGATION DIONITORING AND REPORTIIVG PROGRAIII
Responsible Party/ Date
Mitigation Measure Implementing Procedure Timing Completed/
Monitoring Action
Signature
o Scrapers 623G
o Scrapers 633B
o Four of the six proposed
Scrapers 657G
• Ensure that trucks used at the site
to haul material and/or soil are
model year 2007 or newer(or meet
equivalent U.S.EPA emission
standards).
Require all aerial and personnel
lifts less than 50 horsepower to be
fueled with natural gas or
ro ane.
AIR-2:Implement Mitigation Measure See Mitigation Measure See Mitigation Measure See Mitigation Date:
TRANS-9b(which requires Apple to TRANS-9b. TRANS-9b. Measure TRANS-9b.
expand its TDM Program and Signature:
increase the reduction in peak hour
tri s from 28 ercent to 34 ercent).
AIR-3:Implement Mitigation See Mitigation Measures See Mitigation Measures AIR- See Mitigation Date:
Measures AIR-1 and AIR-2. AIR-1 and AIR-2. 1 and AIR-2 Measures AIR-1 and
AIR-2 Si ature:
AIR-4:The project sponsor shall See Mitigation Measure See Mitigation Measure AIR- See Mitigation Date:
implement Mitigation Measure AIR-1 AIR-1.In addition,the 1. Measure AIR-1.
and the following additional measure: project sponsor shall design Signature:
• To the maximum extent feasible, material staging roads such The Community Prior to the issuance
material staging roads shall be set that they are set back from Development Department of grading,building,
back from the curb by at least 65 the curb by at least 65 feet shall review the construction or permits.
feet. to the maximum extent plans for the project and
feasible. verif that material sta in
81
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
SEPTEMBER 2013 MITIGATION INONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAAI
Responsible Party/ Date
Mitigation Measure Implementing Procedure Timing Completed/
Monitoring Action
Signature
roads are set back from the
curb by at least 65 feet,where
feasible,or another location
approved by the City
following a demonstration of
wh 65 feet is not feasible.
M. PUBLIC SEftVICES AND UTILITIES
PSU-1:The project sponsor shall The project sponsor shall The Public Works Prior to entering Date:
implement signal preemption signals install signal preemption Department shall verify that into a street
at the following intersections signals at the intersections signal preemption signals are improvement Signature:
(identified by the City and SCCFD as identified in Mitigation installed at the intersections agreement,
the ones most likely to be used by Measure PSU-1 or provide identified in Mitigation including bonds or
emergency vehicles accessing the payment to the City to Measure PSU-1. other surety to
project site).The signal preemption allow for the installation of guarantee the
signals would allow emergency such signals. mitigation measure,
vehicles to pass through approxi- the project sponsor
mately 30 seconds before arrival. shall have plans
• North Blaney Avenue and East approved by the
Homestead Road City.
• North Tantau Avenue and East
Homestead Road
North Tantau Avenue and
Pruneridge Avenue
North Tantau Avenue and Vallco
Parkway
• North Tantau Avenue and Project
Entrance
• North Wolfe Road and Pruneridge
Avenue
82
LSA ASSOCIATES. INC. APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
SEPTEMBER 2013 MITIGATION IHONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRADt
Responsible Party/ Date
Mitigation Measure Implementing Procedure Timing Completed/
Monitoring Action
Signature
• North Wolfe Road and Project
Entrance
• North Wolfe Road and East
Homestead Road
• North Wolfe Road and I-280(two
interchanges)
• North Wolfe Road and Vallco
Parkway
Stevens Creek Boulevard and
Perimeter Road
• Stevens Creek Boulevard and
Finch Avenue
Stevens Creek Boulevard and
Tantau Avenue
Heron Avenue and East
Homestead Road
PSU-2:Implement Mitigation See Mitigation Measures See Mitigation Measures See Mitigation Date:
Measures PLAN-1 and PLAN-3. PLAN-1 and PLAN-3. PLAN-1 and PLAN-3. Measures PLAN-1
and PLAN-3. Si ature:
83
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
SEPTEMBER 2013 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTINC PROGRAM
T{iis page intentionall�left blank.
84
EXHi. EA-2a
Tree Replacement Worksheet
Required#of Replacement Trees
Total Trees to Be Removed (Per City of Cupertino Re�uirements per Chapter 14.18) Required Re�lacements for Tree Trans
24"Box 36"Box 48"Box Existing Replacement
Trees wi[h DBH=0 per tree survey 11 #Removed x 1 48"Box Tree 11 Transplant RequiremenN
11 4-8"DBH (2)36"boxes
8.1-12"DBH (2)48"boxes
Total DBH 0"-12"stnd 1908 #Removed x 1 24"Box Tree 1908 12.1-16"DBH (2)60"boxes
Total DBH 0"-12"multi 15 A Removed x 1 24"Box Tree 15 161-20"DBH (2)72"boxes
Total DBH 0"-12"Speamen(Stnd+Multi) 8 #Removed x 1 48"Box Tree 8 201-24"DBH (2)84"boxes
1931 24.1-28"DBH (2)%"boxes
28.1-32"DBH (2)108"boxes
Total DBH 12.1"-18"stnd 795 A Removed x 2 24"Box Trees 1590 32.1-36"DBH (2)120"boxes
Total DBH 12.1"-18"multi 11 #Removed x 2 24"Box Tree 22
Total DBH 121"-IS"Specimen(Stnd+Multi) 9 #Removed x 148"Box Tree 9 "Native&IoN�water usage species to be determine
815 im m�sultation with City Arborist.
Total DBH 18.1"-36"std 692 !t Removed x 136"Box Tree 692
Total DBH 18.1"-36"multi 45 A Removed x 1 48"Box Tree 45
Total DBH 15.1"-36"Specimen(Stnd+6lulti) 18 #Removed x 148"Box Tree 18
755
Total DBH 36.1"+std 54 #Removed x 1 36"6ox Tree 54
Total DBH 36.1"+Multi 24 !t Removed x 1 36"Box Tree 24
Total DBH 18 1"-36"Specimen(Stnd+ptulti) 26 !t Removed x 14S"Box Tree 26
104 3535 815 72
Total Trees To Be Removed 3616 ToWI Replacement Trees Required 4422
MINIMUM p OF REPLACEMENT TREES BY TYPE
Tree Size SAPLING SMALL MEDIUM LARGE X-LARGE SPECIMEN Total by
Type of Tree 15 GAL 24"Box 36"Box 4S"Box 60"Box 72"Box 84"Box 96"Box l08"Box 120"Box 132"Box 144"Rox 156"Box Type
Evergreen Oaks 428 198 3 221 474 165 234 272 156 74 7 2 1 2235
Deaduous Oaks 402 255 71 367 1S9 300 112 50 18 0 0 0 0 1764
Non-Oak Deciduous Trees 30 0 30 100 5 30 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 270
Olives 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 16 0 0 0 D 0 22
Conifers 30 0 0 27 233 77 18 17 1 0 1 0 0 404
Understory Trees 70 525 200 23 15 68 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 905
Fn�it Trees 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
To[al by Size 960 978 304 738 916 646 439 359 175 74 8 2 1 5600
Mirvmum Total Replacement Trees 4640
(24"box or greater)
Total Replacement Trees Required 4422
Excess Replacement Trees 218
Trees will be planted at much larger sizes than required.
Total Proposed Trees:
Existing to Remain 800
Transplant 90
Trees listed aUove(per planting plan) 5600
Fniit Trees(per planting plan) 600
6,200 mmimum required per MM BIO-3
TOTAL 7090
Exhibit EA-2b
Attachment to MMRP
TDM Program Expansion. Apple is proposing to expand its TDM program and increase its
alternative mode share(percentage of employees traveling to the site via walking,bicycling,riding in
private shuttle or public transit vehicles,or ridesharing)from the existing 28 percent.A target of 34
percent at full buildout has been identified as a reasonable target because it is considered aggressive
but achievable for office developments in suburban locations greater than '/2 mile from a rail station.
While higher alternative mode share rates have been established for a few corporate campuses, these
higher rates have generally been in areas more urban than Cupertino where there is a higher density of
transit facilities. The TDM target would be measured at the peak commute hours,when roadways are
most congested.
Project impacts at intersections and freeway segments can be mitigated by increasing the facility's
capacity through physical improvements or by reducing the amount of added project traffic through
TDM measures. At locations where there are no feasible physical mitigation measures to reduce
identified impacts to less-than-significant levels,the alternative mode share increase(and associated
vehicle trip reduction)to 34 percent can reduce the severity of the impact. In addition to reducing the
severity of intersection and freeway impacts,the TDM program expansion was also utilized in the
evaluation of the site's parking demand and associated parking supply.
The City evaluated the feasibility of a mitigation measure requiring a"trip cap."Under a trip cap,
once development of the project site generates trip volumes that exceed AM and PM peak-hour
values for triggering impacts to the transportation system,continued development and growth at the
project site would be halted.A trip cap was rejected as infeasible because it would conflict with a key
project objective of consolidating Apple's engineer and support personnel in one location. In addition,
such a trip cap would limit einployment growth on the site,which would be undesirable to Apple and
the City for economic reasons and would conflict with a key project objective of developing a campus
that can accommodate 14,200 employees.
Instead,"peak trip counts"are established as the goals that would drive the full implementation of
TDM measures in order to reduce physical impacts on the transportation system. Peak trip counts,
which would be established for the AM and PM peak hours of adjacent street traf�c,would help
determine if more robust TDM measures are required to reduce project traffic. In this way,peak trip
counts are used to establish mitigation and inonitoring measures that address the project's impact on
the transportation system while allowing for planned growth within the site as part of the project.
Details ofMitigation Measure TRANS-9b. As part of Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b,Apple
would be required to expand its TDM program to achieve a 34 percent(i.e.,a 6 percentage point peak
hour trip reduction) alternative mode participation rate and associated peak trip counts at full buildout
and occupancy of 14,200 employees. The details of the implementation of Mitigation Measure
TRANS-9b are discussed in this section. The TDM prograin expansion coinponent of Mitigation
Measure TRANS-9b includes some or all of the elements listed below. These elements include: (1)
new TDM ineasures already proposed to be added as part of the project,including TDM measures
already implemented by Apple under existing conditions that would be expanded as part of the
project; and(2) additional measures.
New and Expanded Project TDM Measures. The following measures are new or expanded
measures that would be implemented as part of the project. Existing measures are presented in Table
V.I-6.
• Apple Transit. Expand Apple coach service areas and frequency,and provide priority drop-
off locations for transit users. Participation in Apple transit shall be measured and reported
in real time,with the goal of increasing mode share from 12 percent to 15 percent;
• Mass Transit Shuttle Links. Expand Apple shuttle services to include connections to future
high-capacity corridors such as VTA BRT lines, electrified Caltrain lines,and Santa Clara
BART extensions. The goal is to exceed the baseline 1-2 percent public transit mode share;
• Off Campus Bicycle Infrastructure. Improve off-campus bicycle infrastructure,including:
bike lanes,bike paths,high-visibility striping,bike boxes at key intersections and other
features to encourage safe cycling to and from the site. Strive to increase bicycle mode
share from 2 percent to 5 percent;
• Campus Walking/Cycling Commutes. Prioritize walking and cycling to the site for those
employees who live closest to the campus by providing more convenient pedestrian and
bicyclist access to the Main Building,providing bike lockers closest to the entrances of the
Main Building,and increasing the distance between on-site parking and work space(i.e.,
by accommodating much of the project parking underground or in structures,at a distance
from work space). Since the majority of proposed parking is not adjacent to office and
laboratory space,it is anticipated that the commute time for those employees in a 0-5-mile
radius of the project site would be less by bike and foot,than by car;
• Transit Center. Provide a Transit Center with an information desk for employees to retrieve
maps and information on alternative commute options. The information desk shall be easily
accessible from the Main Building;
• Parking Monitoring System. Develop a parking monitoring system that would measure
individual parking space utilization and collect data to optimize other TDM programs. For
example,arrival time information shall help guide new shuttle schedules throughout the
Apple transit system. The system shall complement other TDM programs by identifying
open parking spaces in various zones and directing employees to the closest zone with an
open space,which can help reduce on-site congestion. Soine of the data collected shall be
included in an annual parking utilization report submitted as part of TDM reporting;
• Expanded Bike-sharing Program.Apple shall provide at least 1,000 bikes within the
project site to enhance mobility and promote cycling as a viable commute option; and
• Electric Vehicle Charging.Apple shall provide at least 300 charging spaces for electrical
vehicles.
Additional TDM Measures. If the measures listed above are ineffective in meeting the peak trip
counts goal,Apple shall implement additional measures until the peak trip counts goal is achieved.
Apple shall choose from among the following when selecting additional ineasures to meet the peak
trip counts goal:
• Expand Mobile Transit Applications. Provide real-time vehicle location and seat availabil-
ity for Apple transit. Integrate this information with data on fixed-route transit(including
VTA and Caltrain real-time arrival/departure times),comparative travel times,and parking
availability so employees have a single information source to compare travel options and
make informed mode choice decisions before they leave home or work;
• Visibiliry of Transit Stops. Improve signage and visibility of transit stops on/adjacent to the
project site beyond that already required by the Conditions of Approval;
• Increase Bicycle Awareness. Offer free clinics,classes,workshops,and other services,like
a bike kitchen,to prioritize bicycle-commuting to/from the project;
• Flexible Work Schedule.Apple shall enable a flexible work schedule in a way that is
compatible with its corporate culture.A flexible work schedule would shift trips away from
the AM and PM peak periods;
• Rewards Program. Develop a rewards/incentive program for alternative commute partici-
pants, such as free meals,car-share vouchers,products,and raffles for prizes;
• Reduced/Subsidized Bicycle Tune-ups. Offer free,or subsidized,bicycle tune-ups to
employees who regularly commute by bicycle;
• Real-time Ridesharing. Introduce real-time ridesharing to commute website and mobile
applications to maintain and expand the potential ride-sharing base of commuters. The goal
is to increase ride-sharing participation beyond 10 percent;
• Telecommuting. Encourage telecommuting where business practices allow;
• Car-sharing. Expand the campus car-sharing fleet and offer deeper discounts for those who
cycle and walk to work. Consider making the program free to further incentivize alternative
commute options;
• Universal Transit Passes. Offer universal transit passes to all employees (i.e.,Caltrain GO
Pass or VTA Eco Pass); and
• Parking Cash-Out. Provide a parking cash-out program under which Apple provides
employees with a cash allowance in lieu of a parking space. For instance,Apple could
provide employees with a monthly cash benefit that is drawn down each day they use a free
parking space at the project site.
• Other Viable TDMMeasures. Other TDM measures identified in consultation with the
City.
TDM Program Monitoring. If the project is approved,Apple would be required to implement a
TDM program that increases its non-single-occupant vehicle mode share from 28 to 34 percent at full-
occupancy,resulting in an AM and PM peak-hour vehicle trip reduction of 6 percentage points. As
part of Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b,a robust monitoring program would be required to ensure that
this TDM prograin mitigation measure is implemented and that the required trip reduction is achieved.
The monitoring program would be subject to review and approval by the City of Cupertino. The TDM
inonitoring program would start 6 months after occupancy of Phase 1. TDM monitoring shall occur
over the life of the project.The TDM monitoring program shall be conducted annually for the first 10
years. If the monitoring reveals that the peak trip counts have not been exceeded in the last 3 years of
the first 10 years of annual monitoring,the TDM monitoring shall be reduced to once every 2 years.
However,if any biennial report reveals that the peak trip counts have been exceeded,the monitoring
shall revert to annual monitoring until such times that the peak trip counts have not been exceeded for
three consecutive annual reports.
TDM Pro�ram Goal
The goal of the program is to ensure that the TDM program reduces the amount of traffic generated by
Apple Campus 2 buildings to fewer than 4,270 AM peak-hour vehicle trips and 4,400 PM peak hour
vehicle trips,where peak hours are defined as the time periods on the adjacent street with the highest
hourly volumes occurring during the morning and evening commute periods. The AM and PM peak
hour trips represent traffic generation estimates evaluated in this EIR with an additional 6 percentage
point reduction(using gross trip estimates from Table V.I-8: 4,544 AM peak hour trips x 94%_
approximately 4,270 AM peak trip count;4,686 PM peak hour trips x 94%=approximately 4,400 PM
peak trip count).
Monitoring Pro�ram
The TDM program monitoring would consist of two main elements: (1) Summary of Implemented
TDM Measures to be provided by Apple, and(2)TDM Monitoring Report to be conducted by an
independent city-approved transportation planning/engineering firm. Each of these components is
described below.
1. Summary of Implemented TDM Measures
Apple would submit annual reports to the City describing the specific TDM measures that
are being implemented,the number of employees on site, and the success of the measures
expressed in AM and PM peak hour vehicle trips and vehicle trips per employee. The
report and data collection would be prepared based on established ineasurement and
monitoring guidelines created by Apple and the City prior to occupancy.
To determine the effectiveness of the expanded TDM program Apple shall collect the
following verifiable data and provide a report to the City(within 180 days of the date of the
first certificate of occupancy)and annually thereafter:
• Apple Transit Ridership-Counted electronically on vehicles and visually verified at
the transit center
• Public Transit Ridership-Counted at area VTA stops
• Cycling/Walking Volumes -Counted via bike/pedestrian entrances and verified using
security footage or in person
• Carpool Volumes -Counted at entrance plazas and verified via security footage
2. TDM Monitoring Report
An independent City-approved transportation planning/engineering firm would be retained by
the City to collect data and present the results of the monitoring program in a written report.
The data collection efforts would include vehicle counts conducted for all Apple Cainpus 2
driveways and/or parking facilities. Daily,hourly, and fifteen-minute period counts would be
taken at the driveways and/or parking facilities over a 2-week period. Counts obtained during
the three midweek weekdays(Tuesday,Wednesday,Thursday)would be averaged. The trip
counts for the site driveways would be added together. Counts shall be performed between
mid-February and late May(before the end of the school year and not during school holidays
such as Spring Break) or between Labor Day and Thanksgiving week. Counts shall avoid
days immediately before or after holidays or long weekends,and shall not be performed on
days with inclement weather. Figure V.I-11 illustrates the required TDM monitoring process
to evaluate the project site's peak trip counts.
If the AM and PM peak hour trip generation of Apple Campus 2 is less than 4,270 AM peak-hour
vehicle trips and 4,400 PM peak-hour vehicle trips,no additional TDM measures would be required.
Trip rates expressed as AM and PM peak hour vehicle trips per employee would also be reported to
assess the vehicle trip-reducing effect of the measures in the current TDM program. The count results
would be divided by the nuinber of employees on site. The results would be compared to the AM
peak hour rate of 0.32 vehicle trips per employee and PM peak hour rate of 0.33 vehicle trips per
employee,which represent the existing 28 percent alternative mode share at the Apple Infinite Loop
campus and the buildings south of Mariani Avenue. The target rates are 0.30 AM peak hour vehicle
trips per employee and 0.31 PM peak hour vehicle trips per employee. However,the peak trip counts
specified above will be the determining factors as to whether Apple has to implement additional TDM
measures.
Actions if TDM Pro�ram is Not Achieved
The City would notify Apple if one or both of the AM and PM peak hour vehicle trip counts(i.e.,
4,270 AM peak-hour vehicle trips and 4,400 PM peak hour vehicle trips) are exceeded, as described
above. Apple would be required to meet with the City to develop a plan and identify new TDM
measures to be added to achieve the peak trip counts. If Apple does not agree to implement the City
approved TDM measures,then Apple would be assessed a$5 per day per trip penalty(adjusted
annually starting in 2014 per the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers in the San
Francisco-Oakland-San Jose area) for the monitoring period. Payments of these penalties are due to
the City within 30 days of issuance of an invoice with supporting documentation. The funds from
these penalties would be used at the City's discretion. Within 60 days Apple would be required to
meet with the City to reevaluate and identify City-approved new TDM measure to be implemented at
the project site. This cycle would continue until Apple agrees to implement City-approved TDM
measures.
Once Apple and the City agree on new TDM measures,Apple would implement these within 60 days
of the notification date. Follow-up counts, surveys, and/or collection of parking utilization data would
be conducted by an independent City-approved transportation planning/engineering firm 60 days after
the new measures are implemented to evaluate the effectiveness of the new TDM plan. If the peak
trip counts are still exceeded,Apple would pay a fee of$3 per day per extra vehicle trip shown in the
peak trip counts(adjusted annually staring in 2014 per the Consumer Price Index for All Urban
Consuiners in the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose area). The funds from these fees would be used to
provide for City-wide implementation of TDM programs and improvement of bicycle and pedestrian
facilities. Payments of these penalties are due to the City within 30 days of issuance of an invoice
with reasonable upporting documentation. After three months,Apple would be required to meet with
the City to identify City additional approved new TDM measures to be added. If Apple still is not
meeting the goal during the next annual monitoring period,penalties would be continued to be levied,
until the peak trip counts goal is met.
Monitoring Pro�ram Fundin�
Apple would pay the City for the annual monitoring costs including the cost to conduct monitoring
and City staff time to review the annual monitoring reports.
Monitoring ProQram Duration
Annual monitoring will be conducted for the first 10 years of the project. If in the last 3 years the trip
thresholds are not exceeded,the monitoring will change to an every other year cycle. However, if any
biennial report reveals that the peak trip counts have been exceeded,the monitoring shall revert to
annual monitoring until such times that the peak trip counts have not been exceeded for three
consecutive annual reports.
The project sponsor would be required to construct feasible physical mitigation measures for project-
specific impacts. These may include the relocation of existing utilities,relocation and/or upgrade of
existing traffic signal hardware and equipment,and other associated improvements in the rights-of-
way, including but not limited to traffic signal poles and cabinets, striping of crosswalks,etc.
Apple Occupies AC2 Campus
6 months �«Monitoring Details
Monitoring Schedule for Life of Project
TDM Program Monitoring* • Annualmonitoringforfirst10years.
• If in the last three years of the 10 years,the peak trip counts
are not exceeded,then monitoring is every otheryear.
• If monitoring reveals that Apple exceeds the peak trip
counts,then annual monitoring will resume until they meet
the numbers for three consecutive monitoring periods.
Meet PeakTrip Counts? Data Collection Periods
• Conduct counts between:
1 year •Mid-February and late May,or
•Labor Day and Thanksgiving week
• Counts should not be conducted on:
Y25 (�JO •Any school holidays
•Days immediately before of after holidays or long weekends
•Days with inclement weather
Additional TDM Measures:
• Consult with City
�zo days . Select measures from
Monitoring Program
• Implement measures
6 months Apple Agrees to Implement
TDM Measures?
witnin
60 days
Yes No
within
60 days
— 3 months
Follow-Up Monitoring Apple Pays Penalty
$5/day/trip
for monitoring period
Meet PeakTrip Counts?
Yes No
Apple Pays Fee
$3/day/trip
for monitoring period
City implements TDM measures for other
users within Traffic Catchment Area
L S � FIGURE VI-11
Apple Campus 2 Project EIR
SOURCE: FEHR&PEERS,APRIL2013. TDM MOri1tOTlri�'
I:�COC1101 App(e Campus 2'�figures�Pig_VI-I l.ai (5!3i13)
EXHIBIT DP-2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL-AB 900 COMPLIANCE
APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROTECT
1. NO NET ADDITIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
For the AB 900 Compliance Conditions of Approval that ensure that the project meets the
no net additional greenhouse gas emissions standard, the Community Development
Director may allow deviations and alterations, provided that the applicant/property
owner establishes to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director that, based
on substantial evidence, the project continues to meet the no net additional greenhouse
gas emission standard.
2. LEED—SILVER OR EQUIVALENT
Pursuant to Chapter 16.58, Green Building Standards Code Adopted, of the Cupertino
Municipal Code, the project shall meet the requirements for Leadership in Energy and
Environmental Design (LEED) Silver certification or an equivalent, at a minimum, as
identified in the Ordinance. Apple shall develop a LEED Silver certification program plan
which shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of Community
Development prior to issuance of building permits. Prior to occupancy, the City will hire a
third-party independent consultant, at Apple's expense, to make a finding that Apple's
LEED program plan meets the requirements of LEED Silver and any then applicable
requirement of the Governor's Guidelines for Streamlining Judicial Review Under the
California Environmental Quality Act("Guidelines").
3. ENERGY
a. ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Apple shall reduce energy use through energy-efficient green building design of
lighting, heating, cooling and ventilation systems to reduce building system energy
use by at least 30 percent compared to typical commercial development. Energy-
efficient building systems, such as the following, shall be incorporated into the
project design: high-efficiency radiant conditioning systems, light-emitting diode
(LED) electric lighting, and natural ventilation. Apple shall submit an energy
efficiency plan for review and approval to the Director of Community Development
prior to issuance of the first building permit. Apple shall fund the cost of an
independent consultant selected by the City to review and report on the energy
efficiency plan so that the Director of Community Development may verify that the
building design will reduce building systems energy use by at least 30 percent
compared to typical commercial development.
b. RENEWABLE ENERGY
100 percent of the project's overall energy needs shall be provided by renewable
energy. Based on Apple's current proposal, Apple shall: (a) install at least 650,000
square feet of photovoltaics on building roofs and the parking garage canopy that
will have a capacity of at least 12 megawatts; (b) construct at least a 6-megawatt fuel
cell installation on-site that will be powered by 100-percent directed biogas; and (c)
AB 900 CONDITIONS
Page DP-2-2
obtain the remainder of the project's energy needs from the State of California Direct
Access Program, off-site Apple-owned renewable energy projects or grid-purchased
renewable energy. For the on-site energy production, the amount of renewable
energy may be scaled to the phase of development. Apple shall acquire grid-
purchased renewable energy from the following sources: (1) participation in
California's regulated Direct Access program; and (2) market purchase of renewable
energy credits that are Green-e Energy certified. The specific Energy Service
Providers and sources used to supply renewable energy for the project may be
determined closer to the time of project completion. Apple shall submit
specifications for the energy systems for review and approval to the Director of
Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. The Director of
Community Development may approve deviations in the design of the energy
systems from those specified above provided that the applicant/property owner
establishes to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director that, based
on substantial evidence, the project's overall energy needs are provided by
renewable energy. Apple shall submit an annual report to the Director of
Community Development by February 15th of each year documenting compliance
with this renewable energy condition for the prior calendar year, including total
energy use and total energy credits for the reporting period supported by
documentation from Direct Access and Green-e Energy certified sources sufficient to
allow the Director of Community Development to make the determination that 100
percent of the project's overall energy needs are being provided by renewable
energy. Due to the timing of the Green-e Energy certificaHon process, which may
take up to six months after the end of the calendar year, the Green-e Energy
certification documentation may be provided in a supplemental filing to occur
within 30 days of completion of the Green-e Energy certification process. The annual
report shall indicate an approximate date of submittal for the Green-e Energy
certification documentation,which shall be no later than August 1St of each year.
4. PARKING AND TRANSPORTATION
In order to reduce peak hour trips, Apple shall implement an enhanced Transportation
Demand Management (TDM) program as required by Mitigation Measure TRANS 9b and
the details of Mitigation Measure TRANS-9b set forth in the TDM Program Expansion on
pages 441-447 and Figure VI-11 of the Draft EIR, all of which are incorporated into these
Conditions of Approval (see Condition 3 - MITIGATION MONITORING AND
REPORTING PROGRAM in Development Permit(DP-2011-04)Resolution).
5. CONSTRUCTION
a. DIRECT ACCESS
For each year during the construction period, Apple shall demonstrate to the
Community Development Director that it has fully offset the project construction
emissions by participation in California's Direct Access program for supplying
renewable power to Apple-owned buildings located in the City.
2
AB 900 CONDITIONS
Page DP-2-3
b. PHASE 1 PROTECT GHG EMISSIONS
Mitigation of all Phase 1 project GHG emissions from construction shall occur
contemporaneously with construction of the project.
6. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY MEASURES
The project shall install 300 electric vehicle charging stations on the project site. The
parking lot shall also be configured to allow for up to 1,000 electric vehicle charging
stations to be installed.
7. WATER SUPPLY
The project shall reduce water use by 30 percent compared to typical commercial
development through use of low-flow fixtures and drought-tolerant landscaping. Apple
shall submit a water supply plan for review and approval by the Director of Community
Development prior to building permit issuance.
8. WASTE MANAGEMENT
a. OPERATIONAL WASTE DIVERSION RATE
The project shall achieve and maintain a diversion rate of at least 50 percent.
b. CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION WASTE DIVERSION RATE
A minimum of 75 percent of construction and demolition waste shall be diverted
from landfills,to the satisfaction of the City.
9. BINDING AND ENFORCEABLE AGREEMENT
As required by Public Resources Code Section 21182(d), the April 12, 2012 agreement
between Apple, Inc., signed by SVP and Chief Financial Officer Peter Oppenheimer, and
the City of Cupertino, acknowledged and agreed to by Aarti Shrivastava, Community
Development Director, constitutes a binding and enforceable agreement by Apple that all
mitigation measures required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act to
certify the project under the Jobs and Economic Improvement Through Environmental
Leadership Act of 2011 shall be conditions of approval of the project, and shall be fully
enforceable by the City of Cupertino or its designees; and that all adopted mitigation
measures shall be monitored and enforced by the City of Cupertino on an ongoing basis
for the life of the obligation to perform, implement or comply with the mitigation
measures. As required by Public Resources Code Section 21183(e), the binding and
enforceable agreement further provides that Apple agrees to pay the costs of the Court of
Appeal in hearing and deciding any case, including payment of court costs for the
appointment of a special master if deemed appropriate by the court, in a form and manner
specified by the Judicial Council, as provided in the Rules of Court adopted by the Judicial
Council pursuant to subdivision (f) of Section 21185 of the Public Resources Code. As
required by Public Resources Code Section 21182(f), the binding and enforceable
agreement also provides that Apple agrees to pay the costs of preparing the
administrative record for the project concurrent with review and consideration of the
project pursuant to CEQA, in a form and manner specified by the City of Cupertino for
3
AB 900 CONDITIONS
Page DP-2-4
the project. Apple shall perform all obligations set forth in the April 12, 2012 binding and
enforceable agreement.
4