Loading...
.04 briefing on Housing Element update CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: Briefing on Housing Element Update process and selection of a Council member to attend Stakeholder meetings. Agenda Date: July 22, 2008 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission select one of its members to participate in the Stakeholder process during the Housing Element update. BACKGROUND: Selection of Consultant: In February 2008, staff distributed a Request for Proposals for the preparation of the Housing Element of the General Plan to nine bay area consultants specializing in Housing Element preparation. Of the nine consultants, two responded with proposals. Staff interviewed the two consultants and selected Bay Area Economics (BAE) to prepare Cupertino's Housing Element for the planning period of2007-2014. Housing Element Process: In accordance with State law, California cities must have an adopted General Plan and the General Plan must contain a Housing Element. While all elements of a General Plan are reviewed and revised regularly to ensure that the plan remains current, state law requires that the Housing Element be updated every five years. State law also dictates the issues that the Housing Element must address and requires the element to be certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to assure that it meets the minimum requirements established by Government Code 965580-65589.8. The major, and most controversial, requirement for the Housing Element is that it requires cities to adequately plan to meet their existing and projected housing needs including their "fair share" of the regional housing need. Each jurisdiction's fair share is related to its projected growth and transit corridors. Attached is an edited version of an Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) PowerPoint that briefly summarizes the issue of growth and housing. ABAG recently completed the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). As part of this process, ABAG recently formed a RHNA committee comprised of regional agencies and local governments to develop a methodology for distributing the nine-county Bay Area's housing need (as determined by HCD) to all local governments in the region. Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director, was selected as one of three representatives from Santa Clara County to serve on the RHNA committee. Each city and county has received an allocation of housing units, broken down by income categories, for which it must plan for by identifying adequate sites zoned at adequate densities. The planning period for this version of the Housing Element is 2007-2014. In response to the allocations, each city and county in the Bay Area will have to review, update and adopt its Housing Element by June 30, 2009. Stakeholder Meetings: During this update, particular attention is being paid to the public participation process. BAE was selected as the City's consultant because of the thorough public participation plan that they submitted with their proposal. The consultant plans on holding three 4-1 educational meetings with key stakeholders and a community workshop after the last stakeholder meeting. All stakeholder and communitY meetings will be videotaped and available for viewing on the city website. Furthermore, PowerPoint presentations with voiceovers are also being proposed for availability. As usual, the stakeholder and community meetings will be advertised on the city website and a postcard with key dates will be mailed out in advance of the first stakeholder meeting. Commission Briefing Session: The purpose of the briefing session is to allow the consultant to provide details on the public participation schedule, including stakeholder selection, and the timeline for the Housing Element preparation. Stakeholders will include representatives from groups including school districts, community groups (such as 3C's and CARES), and the Chamber of Commerce. At the culmination of the discussion on this item, the Planning Commission will be expected to select a Commissioner to participate in the stakeholder meetings. The stakeholder focus group meetings will be held on the evenings of August 21, September 25, and October 23,2008. Submitted by: Vera Gil, Senior Planner ...'.. ...., Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community DeveloP~"-<...-- Enclosures: Timeline ABAG PowerPoint Presentation 4-2 -0 >. CXl CXl CXl CXl CXl CXl ~ Ql .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (j) 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. N N N ~ ~ N ~ E 0 0 03 Q) Q) ;:::: '" ~ 03 N ~ ~ 0 (0 ;:::: 03 05 0 u ~ '" '" '" c: c: c: m m m u u u c: c: c: 0 0 0 U U U C C c:- 0 0 0 '" "0; "0; '0; ro Ql '" UJ UJ :Q ~ ~ ~ U U U U UJ 0 UJ UJ UJ "" 0 0 0 :b CL UJ UJ UJ C -0 '13 c: -0 -0 -0 co Ql Ql Ql co Ql Ql Ql Ql C. E !!l Z Z Z co Ql co U W 0 en en en 0 <.'J UJ UJ UJ 0 OJ Ql Ql Ql .c: c: c: u u u u "0; 0 e e 0 0: UJ ~ c: CL CL cil 0 0 c c C I '0; ~ ~ '" Ql Ql Ql ~ E E E co u c: is UJ III .!E Ql Ql "2 0 III UJ W [ij UJ c: C1l OJ OJ OJ UJ 0 en ~ u c: c: c: u C "~ 0 '0; "0; "0; UJ Ql ... ~ ~ ~ 0 c: E ro a. 0 0 0 UJ "2 E c: I I I <l:: l: U UJ 0 .9 .9 .9 co UJ U UJ 0 ~ -0 c: c: c: c. U Ql :;; E UJ -0 ,2 ,2 ,2 c: Ql lI:I ;'0 co Z Ql U U U UJ ~ ~ ~ c: c: 3: 3: N u 0 -0 -0 -0 "0; OJ Ql Ql :;; ::; e e e ~ "0; 'S; "S; ... E E c 0 Ql Ql ~ lI:I CL I 0 0:: a. .~ ..c 2:- 0 UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ ::::l co ~ <l:: <l:: <l:: <l:: o(l <l:: <l:: a. E CO CO CO CO U CO CO C1l (t '13 0 .... co lI:I LL "C ::J .... l: C1l E C1l jjj OJ ,~ OJ (j) UJ l: Ql UJ Ql 'iij :2 u ::::l c: c: e 0 "2 0 CL C'- "0; ::I: ro UJ c. c. c "E ~ 0 0 e .c: Ql E 1;'1 l: UJ <.'J :e Ql 0 '" 0 0: u ~ c. 3!: C1l OJ U 0 "13 c: 0 .c: .?;- ::::l c: '00 LL UJ "c -'" U ~ ~ m 0 ~ 0 0 E - U I:E ~ N M 3!: 0 2:- 2:-,g =It =It =It >. E 0 C1l 0 o Ql OJ OJ 01=== U U - -'" c: c: c: c: l: u co - (j) (j) ~ -0 ~ ~ - Ql E c: :;::; -0 -oCll Ql Ql Ql 0 ::::l e e ~:2 :2 :2 E u 0 c E 0 Ql ~ U CIl 4-3 4-4 1 4-5 2 IlZI. "Vallejo $294,500 IV Antioch $314~550 Pleasant Hill ~470,OOO iii I: 5tod..1:on ~,2J 5,000 Pleasanton ~.7S0,DOO I: Tracy E: 5.356,000 S2In Car-IDs $956,000 ~ .. iLivermDre 5545,00D I: Cupertino ~1,047 ,5'00 Scotts Valley $612,500 II l"'loro2ln HIli $620,000 . c. Watsonville 5>406,000 . Gilroy $525,000 Ie' .Hollister $352,500 I: Salinas 5.387,500 3 4-6 4-7 4 5 4-8 San CCld05 -5.3%, .. . \fa lIej 0 -37 3%1 . Antioch . -=35 :s% IE. "Stockton -42.2% Pleasant Hill - J L5D/f) IK K ,Manteca 32 30;r Pleasanton .9.0% E Tracy ~ -:'f 5% . Livermore -28.2% . Cupertino 16.7% ScottS Valley -14.8% ~ l.!jorgan Hill -1: :~[ . . Watsonvllle -42.9% t Gilr:oy .30 9% .. -Hollister -4 3 J lilt. c Salinas -, 1 5% ,'1''' .'r' ~. ~ 4-9 6 7 4-10 4-11 8 9 4-12 4-13 10 ~ .....",.~, I...... :"f,.~__.t=f' -.._....... r!t_~_........c'1......_ "',.!')l__--..c: .0::,.. .J:... ....... """..........,.._..... It.._....:;p ......... Juris.diction's Housing Need Allocation "':r"""""","..IU'A~__""'_ rl~..,. "',;.II~'i_~"''''''''''.''__6.a- :~ '. .'t' ..... ~ ...._. . . ... '. .. . .. .. . ... ................ ....... ...~ .: .. ".. I - .' ':" ." . .' ,I,!' , . . '. I' ." . , .... .. I" .. I. ., ...,. . . . I.'...... .. . . .. ~ .... . ..' .... ...... . '.. :: " , " , ;"", ", ',' '" '<"':' ',,',. .' ::: h: :; ,::::' 11 4-14 4-15 12 13 4-16