RF Report ELNET
Radio Frequency — Electromagnetic Energy (RF-EME)
Compliance Report
T-Mobile Existing Facility
Site ID: SF44041A
Address: 21090 Homestead Rd, Cupertino, CA, 94087
DATE: 02/20/2024
Ali
r
n -
41 ':i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
1.0 Executive Summary............................................................................................................................. 3
2.0 MPE Calculations ................................................................................................................................ 4
3.0 T-Mobile Antenna Inventory............................................................................................................. 14
4.0 FCC Rules and Regulations and Guidelines from OET 65 ................................................................. 15
5.0 Safety Recommendations...................................................................................................................... 17
6.0 FCC Limits................................................................................................................................................................... 18
7.0 Mitigation Diagram ................................................................................................................................................... 19
8.0 Summary.................................................................................................................................................................... 20
8.0 Engineering Certification........................................................................................................................................... 21
1 .0 Executive Summary
Site ID SF44041A Site Name SBA: PG&E Stelling Sub
Street Address 21090 Homestead Rd Latitude 37020'08.6"N
City, State, Zip Cupertino, CA, 94087 Longitude 122002'37.1"W
Site Type Lattice Tower Collocation Status ❑ Collocated ❑x Not Collocated
Area Classification General Population Report Type Pre-Study
Access Method Access Gate Report Review Gourav Soni
Report Date 02/20/2024 Report Creation Javed Khan
FCC & T-Mobile The proposed modification will be compliant upon implementing the recommendations in
Compliance Status Section 7
T-Mobile has contracted with Telnet Inc. an experienced and independent Telecommunication Engineering
Consulting firm, to determine whether site SF44041 A will be compliant with the rules and guidelines as
defined by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), OET Bulletin 65, regarding Maximum
Permissible Exposure (MPE) to non-ionizing RF emissions for all individuals, classified in two groups,
"Occupational or Controlled" and "General Public or Uncontrolled.
The Antenna Inventory Table (Section 3) shows all transmitting antennas on the site. The use of"Unknown"
for an operator means the information with regard to the carrier, their FCC license and / or antenna
information was not available. Generic values used as estimation for antenna characteristics for unknown
antennas. Z reference specifies the centerline of the antenna to the indicated level. In this report, it is
assumed that all antennas are operating at full power at all times. Software modeling was performed for all
transmitting antennas located on the site. Telnet Inc. has further assumed a 100% duty cycle and maximum
radiated power for regular antennas and 75% duty cycle for AIR antennas . Obstructions (trees, buildings
etc.) that would normally attenuate the signal are not taken into account. As a result, the predicted signal
levels are more conservative (higher) than the actual signal levels will be from the measurement conclusions.
The modeling software that Telnet Inc. used to create this report is Roofmaster.
A result of over 100% does not make a site out of compliance with FCC guidelines. For predicted EME over
100% of the applicable FCC limit, further remediation (e.g. signage and/or barriers preventing access) is
required to consider the site compliant. Areas exceeding the FCC limit are presented with the barriers and
appropriate signages. Accessible areas outside the demarcated are the safety zones that have predicted EME
values below the FCC's limits. Installation of the recommended mitigation or remediation measures brings
the site into compliance. The predictions models antennas as if they are operating at full power, and this
assumption yields a worst case scenario with more conservative results. On-site measurements may yield
different results, as antennas do not always operate at full capacity.
3
Adj. Roof 2/Adj. Roof 5 Level Modeling with T-Mobile Transmitting
Roof? I ��■■■■ ■' erCer'Ik1 LegendAdj. Adj.
Roof — Utility Tow2 7 ■■Elk VI � 0 + 5
Adj.'. + ■■, 311 ❑ y5% . 1 00�%
Roof 8 '- 1 ' � I U7J - 5UU
Ad;. _ _ 1 Cable■■■■I 5 2 public �imi��
Roof 1 I ��1
Adj.Roof 2 '\ .,- Fence
p ■' S ula 09
Adj.Roof 3. .
I C. c ■ 0 utv Cycle Enabled
I I 10 foot grit) size
19MM (Ayy- 11 to 17 Feet)
B �■
Adj. � Max Value: 54.52%
Roof4 Lattice JA■
Adj.Roof Tower AM■
■
IMF
■ A■� C&FIef Color Code
Adj.Roof9 � EF A■■1
■■ ■i Ground " T'Mub�
■ �� ■ �20 ft�
■ . SMIV
• Hotspot zone does not reach this area
5
Adj. Roof 7 Level Modeling with T-Mobile Transmitting
A Percent M PE Legend
Adj. Add � 4J■■■1MhbhL. I ❑
Roof 6 Roof 7 \Utilit _ ■■� �1
To er
00
Adj. Iy ��}}�jy�aa��rr ��yy��yy
Roof I �■■■�� � 14JU�� �LJU
Cable ■■■' ❑ 500 - 5000°�
� 1 Cable � ���� �
A 6 2 SEE' Public Limits
Roof 5 I �� �■■■'
Adj.Roof 2 '\ I
Adj.Roof 3'� �■■■
I C utv Cycle Enabled
I 10 foot gfid Ize
I�Avo' 10 to 16 Feet)
B 3
Adj. 4 MEN', Max Value: 63.60%
Roo Lattice AMER
Adj.Roof Tower ■■r AF
qL I_ fl ■N' An N
0 m PF im rm Carrier Color Code-
Adj.Roof 9 _ V■ -id E'
1JG r r d s� T-Mobile
ow op r Adj, �20 ft--t-
6
Adj. Roof 8 Level Modeling with T-Mobile Transmitting
■■■ Percent f PE Legend
Adj. Adj'
Roof 6 Roof 7 ❑
To er ■■ERk, I
No • oo
y ��}}�jy�a�r ��yy��yy
Roof 8 I R■■■� � I LJU�� �IJU
Cable �■■■' ❑ 500 - 5000
5000 +
1 Cable ���� Public Limit
Adj. 5 2 ■■■1
of 1 5 1 ��
Adj.Roof 2 '\ � ■■� �I� ��
Adj.Roof 3'
I C utv Cycle Enabled
I 10 foot grid Ize
L_ . — _ . _ . — ■��
B (Avg. 9 to 15 Feet)
' 3 di' 4 ■ Max Value: 48.23%
oof4 Lattice
j. oof Tower
N
Adj.Roof 9
Carrier Color Code'
i
G r r d �W T-Mobile
Adj.Roof —1-20 ft--J-
===pp-
� 10
7
Adj. Roof 3 Level Modeling with T-Mobile Transmitting
i J Percent M PE Legend
Adj. Adl• .
Roof 6 Roof 7 ❑ 0% _ 5
Utility Tower '+
Adj. y���}}��yy'a�� LJ0��yy��yy
Roof 8 I 100 ' 500
Cable ' ❑ 500 - 5000%
IMF
5000 +
1 Cable ��Adj. 6 Public Limits
2
Roof 1 5 1 ��
Adj.Roof 2 '\ Fence ■■' I
PAdL
Roof 3'
I C utv Cycle Enabled
I 10 foot gfid Ize
B (Avg: E to 14 Feet)
3
Adj, 4 Max Value: 0.72%
Roof Lattice
4. dj.Roof Tower
N
Carrier Color Code
Adj.Roof 9
d T-Mobile
Adj.Roof �20 ft�
10
8
Utility Tower Level Modeling with T-Mobile Transmitting
Percent M PE Legend
Adj. Adj.
Roof 6 Roof ❑ 0 _ 5
• tili To er
RAdjJI
oof 1 00 • 500
l
5000 +
16 1 Cabe Public Limits
Roof 1 5
Ad'.Roof t 6 Fence Sula 08
ID utv Cycle Enabled
l 10 foot grid Ize
L — — — [Ayg- 75 to 81 Feet)
Adj. 4 Max Value: 0.24%
La
Adj.Roof
N
Carrier Color Code
Adj.Roof 9
Ground T-Mobile
A .Roo -+-20 ft—#-
9
Cable I Level Modeling with T-Mobile Transmitting
Percent M PE Legend
Ad RdjAdj
Roo 0 _ 5tili To er9 - 100
I 1 00 - 500
500 - 5000
0 5000 +
1 Cabe Public Limit
Roof 1 5 INVU �YI A,� 22 p
Ad'.Roof t FGnCG ula 09
I C ukv Cycle Enabled
10 foot grid Ize
L_ . — • — — — (Avg: 72-33 to 78.33 Feet
Adj. Max Value: 7.88%
LCILULC
dj.Roof
N
Carrier Color Code
Adj.Roof 9
Ground T-Mobile
A .Roo -1-20 ft--J-
10
Cable 2 Level Modeling with T-Mobile Transmitting
Percent M PE Legend
Ad RAdJ
Roo 0° - 5 tili To er
I 1 00 - 500
500 - 5000
10 5000 +
1 Cabe
Roof 1 5 Public Limits
�Y� � 2
Ad'.Roof 2 Fenceula 09
i C utv Cycle Enabled
0 foot grid Ize
(Avg: 6 -33 to 68.33 Feet)
3
Adj. 4 Max Value: 6.18%
La
Adj.Roof T
N
Carrier Color Code
Adj.Roof 9
Ground T-Mobile
A .Roo �20 ft�
II
Cable 3 Level Modeling with T-Mobile Transmitting
Percent MPE Legend
Adj.Roof Roof? ( ■■■■■■'• Utility Tower �■■�■■' El1# a 1 -
Adj.Roof 8 10 Y�} �y�yU I ' �ya� 5U�
5000 +
1 Ca1 F
ble po� Public Limit
Adj. 5 2 ■■1
Roof 1 j 5 I ��
Ad.Roof 2 p �y kI [
::]Adj.RI of 3 I�■■■1 r'utv Cyrrle Enabled
I 110 foot gf1d �1ze
_ —� _ (A 52.83 to 58.33 Feet)
B 3
Adj' 4 Max Value: 16.29%
oof 4 Lattice REIM
dj.Roof Tower �OMNI
E.EdL. I +
. ■■■■rl N
M M M M M F' Carrier Color Code
Adj.Roof 9 .RA■■■■■I 0 u n d I� fi-I�+I�bile
-��■ ■ �20 ft—*
12
Ground Level Modeling with T-Mobile Transmitting
Percent M PE Legend
Adj.
6 Roof ❑ 0% a 5
tili To er '''+�
9 - t 00
Roof 8 1 00ar • 500
_ 1 5000
1 Cabe Public Limits
Roof 1 5 -LY]
Ad'.Roof 2 6 Fence Sula 06
1 IDutv Cycle Enabled
10 foot grid Ize
— t (Avg- 0 to 6 Feet)
3
Adj. 4 Latti IMI Max Value: 38.47%
ce
Adj.Roof Tower
A
Carrier Color Code
Adj.Roof 9
r u d T-Mobile
-+-20 ft- #-
13
3.0 T-Mobile Antenna Inventory
Sector Antenna Number Operator Technology Antenna Make Antenna Model Azimuth(°) Height AGL
A 1 TMO NR RFS APXVAALLI2N 43-U-NA20 30 92
A 1 TMO LTE RFS APXVAALLI2N 43-U-NA20 30 92
A 1 TMO LTE RFS APXVAALLI2N 43-U-NA20 30 92
A 1 TMO NR RFS APXI6DWV-16DWV-S-E-A20 30 92
A 1 TMO LTE RFS APXI6DWV-16DWV-S-E-A20 30 92
A 2 TMO NR Ericsson AIR6449 B41 30 41.83
A 2 TMO NR Ericsson AIR6449 B41 30 41.83
B 3 TMO NR RFS APXVAALLI2N 43-U-NA20 150 92
B 3 TMO LTE RFS APXVAALLI2N 43-U-NA20 150 92
B 3 TMO LTE RFS APXVAALLI2N 43-U-NA20 150 92
B 3 TMO NR RFS APXI6DWV-16DWV-S-E-A20 150 92
B 3 TMO LTE RFS APXI6DWV-16DWV-S-E-A20 150 92
B 4 TMO NR Ericsson AIR6449 B41 150 41.83
B 4 TMO NR Ericsson AIR6449 B41 150 41.83
C 5 TMO NR RFS APXVAALLI2N 43-U-NA20 290 92
C 5 TMO LTE RFS APXVAALLI2N 43-U-NA20 290 92
C 5 TMO LTE RFS APXVAALLI2N 43-U-NA20 290 92
C 5 TMO NR RFS APXI6DWV-16DWV-S-E-A20 290 92
C 5 TMO LTE RFS APXI6DWV-16DWV-S-E-A20 290 92
C 6 TMO NR Ericsson AIR6449 B41 290 41.83
C 6 TMO NR Ericsson AIR6449 B41 290 41.83
• 75%Duty Cycle is applied on AIR6449 B41 antenna in each sector
14
4.0 FCC Rules and Regulations and Guidelines from OET 65
When considering the contributions to field strength or power density from other RF sources, care
should be taken to ensure that such variables as reflection and re-radiation are considered. In cases
involving very complex sites predictions of RF fields may not be possible, and a measurement survey
may be necessary The process for determining compliance for other situations can be similarly
accomplished using the techniques described in this section and in Supplement A to this bulletin that
deals with radio and television broadcast operations. However, as mentioned above, at very complex
sites measurements may be necessary.
In the simple example shown in the below diagram, it is desired to determine the power density at a
given location X meters from the base of a tower on which are mounted two antennas. One antenna is
a CMRS antenna with several channels, and the other is an FM broadcast antenna. The system
parameters that must be known are the total ERP for each antenna and the operating frequencies (to
determine which MPE limits apply).The heights above ground level for each antenna, H1 and H2, must
be known in order to calculate the distances, R1and R2,from the antennas to the point of interest.
is
This summarizes the policies, guidelines and requirements that were adopted by the FCC on August
1, 1996, amending Part 1 of Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations,and further amended by action
of the Commission on August 25, 1997 (see 47 CFR Sections 1.1307(b), 1.1310, 2.1091 and 2.1093, as
amended from FCC "OET Bulletin 65"). Commission actions granting construction permits, licenses to
transmit or renewals thereof, equipment authorizations or modifications in existing facilities, require
the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA), as described in 47 CFR Section 1.1311, if the
particular facility, operation or transmitter would cause human exposure to levels of radiofrequency
(RF) electromagnetic fields in excess of these limits. For exact language, see the relevant FCC rule
sections.
The FCC-adopted limits for Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) are generally based on
recommended exposure guidelines published by the National Council on Radiation Protection and
Measurements (NCRP) in "Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic
Fields," NCRP Report No. 86, Sections 17.4.1, 17.4.1.1, 17.4.2 and 17.4.3. Copyright NCRP, 1986,
Bethesda, Maryland 20814. In the frequency range from 100 MHz to 1500 MHz,exposure limits for field
strength and power density are also generally based on the MPE limits found in Section 4.1 of, "IEEE
Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields,
3 kHz to 300 GHz," ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992, Copyright 1992 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers, Inc., New York, New York 10017, and approved for use as an American National Standard by
the American National Standards Institute (ANSI).The exposure guidelines are based on thresholds for
known adverse effects and they incorporate a significant margin of safety.The federal health and safety
agencies such as: the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA"), the Food and Drug Administration
("FDA"),the National Institute on Occupational Safetyand Health("NIOSH")and the Occupational Safety
and Health Administration ("OSHA") have also been actively involved in monitoring and investigating
issues related to RF exposure.
The formulas used in Roofmaster for calculating Power density is based on FCC "OET Bulletin 65",
Section 2: PREDICTION METHODS,August 1997, Edition 97-01. Power density is converted to Maximum
Permissible Exposure Limits(MPE Limits) based on Limits of General population/Uncontrolled Exposure
and Limits of Occupational/Controlled Exposure presented in the following table generated from
Appendix A of"OET Bulletin 65"
Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure
Frequency Averaging Time
Range Power Density(S) z
E 1 H 12,or S
(mW/cmZ) �
(MHz) (minutes)
300-1500 f/300 6
1500-100,000 5 6
Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure
Frequency power Density(S) Averaging Time a
Range E�Z, IH�Z,orS
(MHz) (mW/cmz) (minutes) -
300-1500 f/1500 30
1500-100,000 1 30 f- Fr
16
5.0 Safety Recommendations
5.1.1 Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Requirements
OSHA requires that those in the Occupational classification must complete training in RF Safety, RF
Awareness, and Utilization of Personal Protective Equipment. OSHA also provides options for Hazard
Prevention and Control:
Hazard Prevention Control
• Utilization of good equipment • Employ Lockout/Tag out
• Enact control of hazard areas • Utilize personal alarms & protective clothing
• Limit exposures • Prevent access to hazardous locations
• Employ medical surveillance and accident • Develop or operate an administrative control
response program
5.1.2 RF Signage and Barriers
RF signs and preventive barriers have an important role in appropriately alerting a worker before entering
into a potential RF exposure area. All RF signs should be abided by at all times.
IN CASE OF �� ,NOoaE ®,„ • ACAUTION
EMERGENCY
CALL
�d
1-877-611-5868 .e as .a s.,.0 I
-
T••h[uhfle• •- T.Mobile ... ..,
L 1��Flobile- 1--.l[obile- 1�-Alabile
NOC Guidelines Notice Caution Warning
This sign indicates This sign will inform This sign indicates This sign indicates This sign indicates
T-Mobile emergency anyone of the basic that transmitters that RF emissions that RF emissions
call number along with precautions to follow operated by T- may exceed the may exceed the
site Name and Number when entering an area Mobile are in full FCC General FCC General
with transmitting compliance with Population or Population or
radiofrequency FCC regulations Occupational MPE Occupational MPE
equipment. limits limits
Telnet, Inc. recommends coordinating with all wireless tenants before performing services in front
of or near any transmitting antennas. During these activities, it may be appropriate to utilize
Lockout/Tagout Procedures, "RF Exposure: Responsibilities, Procedures & Guidelines" for
scheduled outages to eliminate RF hazards during these activities.
17
6.0 FCC Limits
6.1 Contribution to Co-Located areas
Any wireless operator that contributes 5%or greater of the MPE limit in an area that is identified to be
greater than 100% of the MPE limit is responsible taking corrective actions to bring the site into
compliance.
6.2 Occupational limits
Apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment provided those
persons are fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure.
Limits for occupational/controlled exposure also apply in situations when an individual is transient
through a location where occupational/controlled limits apply provided he or she is made aware of the
potential for exposure.
6.3 General population limits
Apply in situations in which the general public may be exposed, or in which persons that are exposed
as a consequence of their employment may not be fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot
exercise control over their exposure.
6.4 Controlled Environment
Applies to environments that are restricted or "controlled" in order to prevent access from members
of the General Population classification.
6.5 Uncontrolled Environment
Applies to environments that are unrestricted or"uncontrolled"that allow access from members of the
General Population classification.
6.6 Generic Values
The use of "Unknown" for an operator means the information with regard to the carrier, their FCC
license and/or antenna information was not available. Generic values used as estimation for Effective
Radiated Power(ERP) and antenna characteristics for unknown antenna.
18
7.0 Mitigation Diagram
Access Gate
Install Notice,NOC
and Guidelines signs
Utility Tower
Ad'. Roof I Sector A
Ad Roof 8
sector c I Cable
Adj. Roof 1 I Cable
5 1 /� /, 2
Adj. Roof 2 III/ Fence
Adj. R.of 3
I I
B 3
Adj. 4
Roof4 Lattice
Sector B
Adj. Roof E Tower
Adj. Roof 9
ra
Ground Carrier Color Code
T __77]
—rl ♦20 ft—+-
19
8.0 Summary
All calculations performed for this analysis yielded results that were not within the allowable limits for
exposure to RF Emissions and the site will be compliant by implementing the recommended mitigation.
There are No collocated carriers on the site.
A result of over 100% does not make a site out of compliance with FCC guidelines. For predicted EME
over 100% of the applicable FCC limit, further remediation (e.g. signage and/or barriers preventing
access) is required to consider the site compliant. Areas exceeding the FCC limit are demarcated with
barriers and appropriate signage. Accessible areas outside the demarcated safety zones have predicted
EME below the FCC limits. Installation of the recommended mitigation or remediation measures brings
the site into compliance.The engineering models antennas as if they are operating at full power except
for T-Mobile AIR antennas, and this assumption yields more conservative results (higher predicted
EME). On-site measurements may yield different results, as antennas do not always operate at full
capacity
The anticipated maximum contribution from each sector of the proposed T-Mobile facility on the
ground is 38.7%of the FCC general public limit.This was determined through calculations along a radial
from each sector taking power values into account as well as actual vertical plane antenna gain values
per the manufacturer-supplied specifications for gain. Based on worst-case predictive modeling, there
are no areas at ground level related to the proposed antennas that exceed the FCC's occupational or
general public exposure limits at this site. At ground level, the maximum power density generated by
the antennas is approximately 0.039 mW/cm2 of the FCC's general public limit.
A site is considered out of compliance with FCC regulations if there are areas that exceed the FCC
exposure limits and there are no RF hazard mitigation measures in place. Any carrier which has an
installation that contributes more than 5% of the applicable MPE must participate in mitigating these
RF hazards. For this facility, the calculated values were above the allowable 100% threshold standard
per the federal government which will be controlled by engineering methods.
Modeling indicates that there are areas on the walking/working surfaces at the rooftop level in front of
the T-Mobile antennas that may exceed the FCC standards for general population and/or occupational
exposure.To reduce the risk of exposure and/or injury,Preparer recommends that access to the rooftop
or areas associated with the active antenna installation be restricted and secured where possible.
In order to alert any workers potentially accessing the site, a blue Notice sign, white NOC and yellow
Guidelines signs are recommended for installation at the site's access.
20
8.0 Engineering Certification
I Kenneth D Gilbert, P.E. State:
The stamp and signature on this page certify the following:
• 1 am a Registered Professional Engineer in the state of California, license # E20159 expiration date
12/3 1/2024.
• 1 am familiar with the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as
well as the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), both in
general and specifically as they apply to the FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio-
frequency Radiation.
• 1 reviewed the RFE-EME Compliance Report for the T-Mobile site.
Site Name SBA: PG&E Stelling Sub
Site ID SF44041A
Street 21090 Homestead Rd
Address Cupertino, CA, 94087
and based on supplied data and to the best of my knowledge I believe the Report to be true and accurate.
c )c
m
E20159
OF CA
Kenneth D Gilbert, P.E., PMP Date: 02/20/2024
Registered Professional Engineer
California License # E20159
21