Loading...
1 - 2021-11-15 Arborist inspection report by WLCA Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A 11/15/2021 Arborist Inspection Letter Inspection Time Period: November, 2021 Site: Vallco Town Center Period: Make-Ready Phase Work Zones: (Various) Craig Bacheller, Rafael Vinoly Architects (RVA)cbacheller(a)vinolv.com Mike Rohde, Vallco Property Manager mrohde(cDvallcoshoppingmall.com , mrohde(cDshpco.com (Sand Hill Property Co.) Paul Hansen, Sand Hill Construction Management phansen@shcmllc.com Dwight Harris, Devcon Construction Site Supervisor(General Contractor of record)dharris(@devcon-const.com To whom it may concern: The author Walter Levison, Consulting Arborist or"WLCA"visited the site on 11/15/2021 to re-inspect tree protection measures, tree irrigation, and signage installed by Devcon. The site is currently in make-ready phase undergoing utilities installations, etc. in preparation for building. Most demolition and grading has been completed. This report includes some or all of the following reference items: • Full Tree Map/Tree location and protection plan sheet P-0602A by OLIN 2020. • Photographs/ Digital images representative of current site conditions archived in summer, 2021 and 11/15/2021 by WLCA. • Tree Data Table/The tree data table provided at the end of this report is the 7/10/2021 iteration. Trees removed from the site since start of project are noted on this Excel table with black hatching fill, and the rightmost column contains detailed, updated notes on tree condition, approximate removal date, etc. The database was updated by WLCA to note all of the hundreds of permitted removals that have occurred since start of demolition phase 1A in 2018. In June/July 2021, approximately fifty (50)trees were removed with permit, per plan, in Block 6 and Block 11, and noted as such in the updated tree database iteration attached to this report. • Updates per this month's site visit(11/15/2021) are noted in non-bolded yellow highlight. • To-do punchlist items for SHPCO or other site personnel are noted in black bold yellow highlight. 1 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmr(a)vahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST 1O1r- ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A ITEMS OF NOTE/ NOVEMBER, 2021 TRANSPLANTING CALIFORNIA SYCAMORES#260, 261, & 262: This +/- 30 foot diameter rootball tree move is currently being irrigated 1x/day for 1 hour, except Sundays, using bubblers and emitter line, held at the southwest corner of the Vallco site. The image below shows the current layout of the ball with the buffer zone contained using a silt fence/wire mesh/steel stake setup, and the entire ball and buffer then protected with an additional chain link fence perimeter to prevent site vehicles or machinery from _ x approaching the ball in a way that could cause ` accidental physical damage. Access by site personnel S such as WLCA to allow for moisture monitoring is still - able to be performed. Current irrigation regime is 300 feet of/2' diameter emitter line with 1 gallon per hour emitters spaced every 12 inches, running on a timer 60 minutes (1 hour) per day, every day except Sundays, which theoretically emits 300+ gallons per day to the top of ball under optimal pressure conditions (actual water application may be less). There are also roughly nine (9) individual '/2" diameter flood bubblers set up ;n- r over the ball which each emit water at a much higher rate per hour, over •n the rootball. Portions of the tree's �': R t ' " ` canopy are increasingly 4 defoliated, with ongoing ` loss of live foliage over time. This was to be '�• 1 expected, given that we `y� '• r _ moved a very large,very old specimen in the middle of summer(hot) weather conditions. See + foliage image at right, showing a sample of the E A• � P sycamore canopy as of 9/24/2021 (partial of the canopy attached to 1 of 3 + mainstems). �c Rootball soil moisture as ' �Ii► ~±. ' ` r of 11/15/2021 appears to , be very good inside the box, based on WLCA's probing and coring using a moisture meter probe and an AMS soil core extractor. 2 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmra yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST 1O1r- ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A TRANSPLANTING CALIFORNIA SYCAMORES#260, 261, &262 (CONT.): One 5 inch diameter limb system broke out of the boxed sycamore group of mainstems, from the southmost mainstem at height. The broken area � as seen here is intact, live, healthy, white colored .r wood tissue across the entire cross section of the break, and does not exhibit any decay at all. Therefore, the cause of failure was not tree r decline. The stem appears to have simply broken , out during the recent historic high rainfall/wind -.- event October 24 and 25, 2021 due to high wind load forces. See photos by WLCA at right. This,, _ F page. f 3 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmr(a)vahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A ITEMS OF NOTE/ SEPTEMBER, 2021 TRANSPLANTING HOLLY OAKS #97, 98, AND#99 Three of the five on-site holly oak specimens to be transplanted to a temporary but long-term holding location at Vallco, trees 97, 98, and 99, were heavily irrigated in July, 2021 for roughly 2 hours per day, every day of the week except Sundays, starting in late June or early July, 2021, to prepare them for rootball severing and boxing up into wooden boxes so that they could be moved. In late July, 2021, the trees were dug out over a period of 1 or 2 weeks or more (WLCA was out of office during this period). In mid-August, 2021, one of the three trees was moved to the formal holding location just west of East Perimeter Road which borders an Apple Inc.-owned site. On 8/16/2021 the remaining two of three holly oaks in this grouping of trees 97, 98, and 99 were physically transported on flatbed trucks with the trees on their sides, in full wooden slat boxes, to the holding location at the northeast corner of Vallco property,just west of East Perimeter Road. Once the trees were moved to the holding location, they were raised up using a crane, and then hand-watered using a tow-behind water tank and spray apparatus for temporary irrigation over the tops of the rootballs. Approximately 40 feet of emitter line is snaked over the top of each tree, with roughly 40 emitters that emit 1 gallon per emitter per hour(theoretical, using average water pressure). Approximate volume of water per tree per each day of the week is therefore +/-40 gallons/tree/day (60 minutes of system activation run time per tree per day), as of 9/24/2021). The trees were initially very heavily watered with hundreds of gallons of water after being moved to the site. Other Notes: One of the five (5)total holly oak trees moved to the east side of Vallco had to be side-pruned to remove horizontally-oriented structure that was preventing its being loaded onto its side on the flatbed truck (see image next page). These initial pruning cuts can be cleaned up later as-needed. All five of the holly oaks are now boxed and being irrigated at the holding area at the east end of the site. In September, 2021, The Vallco project team had the tree mover relocate the boxed holly oaks farther from r w ' the existing buildings so that the trees would not be damaged during demolition of those existing older structures to be removed as part of the Vallco project. As seen at right, the asphalt surface is covered with q + chipper truck type wood chip mulch in an attempt to reduce heat gain and reduce albedo (reflected - sunlight). - + Rootball soil moisture in these boxes appears to be ., very good, as assessed by WLCA on 11/15/2021 using a moisture probe meter and an AMS brand soil core = s `" fi. extractor. Irrigation water can be seen visibly reaching the bottom boards of each box when inspected closely. Below and Right: Holly Oak transplanting photos 9/24/2021 (WLCA) 4 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmr(a)vahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ` Tree Risk Assessment Qualified `SC` Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ` Certified ` •• ' j 4 ,. ------ ..... ... t Al •� �� i • Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A ITEMS OF NOTE/ NOVEMBER, 2021 LIST OF DEAD AND DYING TREES WLCA noted that in the WLCA tree database there are a very large number of the trees in dead, very poor, or poor overall condition that may die outright due to natural causes (e.g. soil moisture deficit from extended droughty weather conditions in California between roughly 2011 and 2017, etc.) unrelated to the Vallco property redevelopment work. At the request of City of Cupertino and Sand Hill Property Co., WLCA prepared a formalized written list of all of the dead and dying trees at Vallco, dated October, 2021. The list was then revised 11/15/2021 to add trees#555 and #1122 which were found to be in very poor condition during WLCA's November, 2021 field inspection. This list was submitted by WLCA to the project team. RECENT RAINFALL We did receive a relatively large volume of natural rainfall water occurring in the beginning of November, 2021, when historical record rainfall events happened, boosting soil moisture in tree root zones to 100% throughout the uppermost few feet of the soil profiles of most Bay Area trees that have open soil type rooting areas.With cooler temps and low sun track angles, this moisture still remains in the ground as of the date of writing, and is helping to maintain good soil moisture availability for trees at Vallco. SOIL MOISTURE As of today 11/15/2021, most open soil tree root zone areas at Vallco are at roughly 70-100%field capacity soil moisture when probed with a Lincoln meter/probe, which is a direct result of our over-grade, heavy-flow type temporary irrigation system installed by SHPCO contractors. IRRIGATION AT VALLCO The Vallco irrigation system as of November, 2021, activates approximately 3 days a week, for 30 minutes each of those run days, for a total of roughly 1.5 hours per tree per week, which is the reduced rate for winter, 2021-22. WLCA did a volumetric test in 2020 with SHPCO, to determine actual irrigation water volume output per bubbler. The result was +/-60 fluid ounces water volume per each minute of activation per bubbler, which when calculated at 1.5 hours per tree per week and assuming 2 bubblers per tree, equals +/-84 gallons per tree per week, and 337 gallons per tree per month. This is roughly the same rate of irrigation volume suggested for temporary irrigation of landscape trees, which was somewhat standardized by Barrie Coate&Associates' back in the 1980's at the rate of 10 gallons per inch of trunk diameter per month for native oaks and other drought tolerant tree species, and 20 gallons per each single trunk inch for coast redwoods (i.e. for higher water use type species), which works out to about 600 gallons per month per tree for a 30 inch diameter ash or redwood and 400 gallons per month for a 20 inch diameter tree. ' Mr.Michael Bench,Consulting Arborist,currently the Contract City Arborist for City of Cupertino planning division, consulted for Barrie Coate and Associates for decades,and is very familiar with the 10 gallon/20 gallon irrigation standard developed and used by Coate. 6 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmr(a)vahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A ITEMS OF NOTE/ NOVEMBER, 2021 N. WOLFE ROAD/ASH SPECIMENS RETAINED ALONG NORTHWEST SIDE: The ash tree specimens being retained along the northwest it `s portion of N.Wolfe Road are irrigated using three (3) parallel ' lines of/2" diameter netafim or similar emitter line, with built-in emitters at 12 inch spacing along each entire line. Soil moisture in the narrow open soil strips in which these ash r specimens are growing are subject to faster drydown than other open soil planting strips at Vallco, due to the relatively very narrow strip diameters which tend to discourage rainfall ;'�• ;: and irrigation moisture retention at depth, and shed rainfall water relatively quicklyfrom the surface of the planter strip. Soil moisture in this area of the site was roughly 60% to 100% - field capacity, versus almost 100%field capacity for most other wider planter strips at Vallco. WLCA also noted that the ash specimens being retained along C this area were severely pruned to limb up canopy branch architecture to clear street airspace, resulting in streetside trees that are narrow in form, and possibly severely stunted due to the heavy pruning. �" A Given that the trees' root systems are limited to relatively very ' narrow open soil rooting areas, any adjustment to or renovation of the sidewalks in this area will likely cause p significant root loss and/or root damage, resulting in further decline of the trees. This may mean that the trees will have to be replaced prematurely with new 15 gallon or 24" box size plantings during the landscape installation phase of the Vallco site redevelopment project(TBD). 7 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmr(a)vahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST .Jiil ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A INSPECTION TABLE: LINE ITEM TREE TAG NUMBER DESCRIPTION NUMBERS NOTES / LOCATION AFFECTED 1. Tree#804 was originally in 20% overall condition in May, 2020 after a neighbor's tree care contractor removed approximately 40 or more branches from the tree. The tree is now in 10% overall condition (near- dead), but is interestingly"bushing out"with new twig and needle growth origininating from the historical branch attachment points. As of Feb, 2021, it is not entirely clear if the tree will survive over the long term. Vallco's use of heavy irrigation non-stop year round will assist the tree in accessing adequate water from soil moisture provided by that irrigation. 2. Tree#852 was in 50% overall condition prior to illegal pruning by neighbor in October, 2020. As of February, 2021, it is now in 20% overall condition (very poor), and has a poor long term survival prognosis. The decline in canopy condition appears to be directly due to the illegal pruning by the neighbor's tree care contractor. February, 3. Tree#853 was in 15% overall condition prior to October, 2020 illegal 2021: pruning. As of February, 2021, it is now in 10%overall condition (near- dead), likely as a direct result of neighbor pruning.The tree will Redwood Tree probably have to be removed at this time for safety purposes, Canopy May, 2020 resulting in a hole in the evergreen screen between West Perimeter Dieback Incident: Road and the neighbors to the west. Related to #804 4. Tree#854 was in 38% overall condition prior to October, 2020 illegal Illegal Neighbor pruning. As of February, 2021, the tree is now in 5%overall condition 1 Pruning of the October, (essentially"dead"), and will likely have to be removed for safety Trees Back in 2020 purposes, again, resulting in an evergreen screening "hole" of circa May, Incident: increasing dimensions, as we continue to remove trees from the row of 2020 & #852, 853, mature redwoods. This will destroy the screening value of the row of October, 2020 854, 855, 856 evergreen redwoods, allowing a new sight-line between the Vallco (approx. date of project and the neighbors to the west. two separate 5. Tree#855 was in 53% overall condition prior to October, 2020 illegal incidences) pruning. As of February, 2021, the tree is now in 20% overall condition (i.e. "very poor"). The tree may survive, given that the Vallco team continues to provide each single redwood and ash tree with roughly 500 gallons of irrigation water each month, year-round. 6. Tree#856 was in 40% overall condition prior to October, 2020 illegal pruning. As of February, 2021, the tree is now dead, with an overall condition rating of"0%", and will have to be removed for safety purposes. Again, as noted above for trees#853 and #854, this will open up a sight-line screening hole in the evergreen row, allowing views between the Vallco project and the neighbors west of west perimeter road. Overtime, this hole may fill in as surrounding trees extend their limbs into the newly-created airspace. However, because three (3) separate tree specimens will likely be removed in close proximity to one another at one time, it may remain open for many years. New redwood plantings can be installed in this newly-opened screening hole, and will grow as much as 3 to 6 feet vertical height gain per year. 8 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmr(a)vahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST 'jill ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A LINE ITEM TREE TAG NUMBER DESCRIPTION NUMBERS NOTES / LOCATION AFFECTED ASH #103 DECAY/ LEAN SITUATION: WLCA noted on 7/28/2020 that the north side of the root crown of tree#103 was decayed, with approximately 12 inches of linear length as open cavity at grade elevation (see photos at end of this inspection report). The depth of the decay cavity (void) is not known, but it is highly likely that the entire north side of the root plate has been compromised in terms of structural stability. LEAN: The tree appears (visually)to be leaning further off vertical than any other ash specimen growing in this row of street trees along the west side of N. Wolfe Road. The tree currently leans southeast over N. Wolfe Road, and does not appear to have righted itself to vertical with any new vertical growth. This suggests that the lean is a new lean, related to root plate instability brought on by decay of and failure of the north side of root crown. Street tree (TREE #103 LEAN CONTINUED) JULY, 2020 #103 Note that the north side of the root late where the decay is located is the "tension (evergreen side" of this tree's lean, which means that the leaning mass is tensioned against Tree decay ash (pulling against)the north side of the root plate. Given that the decay is on that situation noted specimen), tension side, this necessarily means that the tree's ability to maintain an upright 2 by Sand Hill at west side position against gravity is compromised, since the lean side of a root crown/root Property Co. of N.Wolfe plate is the side that is most crucial to maintain in good, healthy condition free of Staff in July, the Rd, where AMC defects or decay2. 2020 movie theatre was located. WLCA installed two (2) nails into the uphill side of the tree lean, approximately 18 inches apart, on the lower trunk, in order to measure degrees of lean off from vertical during each monthly inspection report period. The degrees of lean were measured using a straight edge placed over the two nails, and a digital Nikon Forestry Pro hypsometer placed over the straight edge. WLCA shot ten (10) digital readings. The average number of lean degrees as read on the instrument screen was 74.4 degrees actual angle (15.6 degrees off-vertical), which can now be used as a BASELINE LEAN reading to compare with each future monthly reading, using the same equipment on the same nail heads. UPDATE OCTOBER 28, 2020:WLCA re-measured the lean using the Nikon hypsometer and a steel straight edge. The average lean from 10 readings was 74.4 degrees actual vector angle, which is only 0.0 degrees difference from the original baseline reading. Per written standards on measuring change of lean, a change in lean of greater than 1.0 degree in the direction of lean during a follow- up site visit, compared to the original baseline angle of lean, would be the threshold for risk reduction action such as tree removal, reduction pruning, etc.3 WLCA still recommends that this tree be removed. NOVEMBER, 2020 to JULY, 2021:WLCA did not re-measure lean angle. Tree appears stable, but should still be monitored monthly. 9of24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmr(a)vahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST 'jiil ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A LINE ITEM TREE TAG NUMBER DESCRIPTION NUMBERS NOTES / LOCATION AFFECTED 1. Trees Affected: There were a total of 26 coast redwood specimens illegally pruned, starting with #846 in the north, to#871 at the southmost end where the locked access gate portal is located. As of date of writing, some of these neighbor-pruned trees are starting to express decline in live needle densit as a si n of decline in or. r Twenty-six ' West Perimeter (26)trees Road Coast #846 (north Redwoods most 3 Illegally Pruned specimen)to by Neighbor(s) #871 (south In 2020 most specimen) City of Cupertino Staff has requested that we provide arborist recommendations for best management practices to optimize the survival of the trees negatively affected by unauthorized neighbor pruning.WLCA notes that we have been providing the trees with the best possible cultural care already, per arboriculture Best Management Practices, by maintaining natural wood chip mulch coverage on the root zone soil surface, maintaining year-round heavy irrigation via surface flex tubing and high flow type flood bubblers at far greater than average rates of water application, and maintaining chain link fencing around the perimeters of the tree root zones 24 hours a day. Dunster,Dr. Julian.2017. Tree Risk Assessment Manual, 2nd Edition. International Society of Arboriculture publications(USA). 3 Smiley, Thomas,Dr.Determining Change of Lean. Open source internet technical report by Bartlett Tree Experts(Bartlett Tree Research Laboratory),USA: https://www.bartlett.com/resources/determining-change-of-lean.pdf 10 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmr(a)vahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A LINE ITEM TREE TAG NUMBER DESCRIPTION NUMBERS NOTES / LOCATION AFFECTED Illegal West Redwoods#611 through#621 were illegally pruned in the vicinity of the Vallco Perimeter Road joint trench area by a tree care company hired by one of the property owners redwood tree living directly west of West Perimeter Road. The tree care company literally specimen #611, 612, shaved off the entire west sides of the trees' canopies, from top of property 613, 614, pruning by boundary wall to the tops of the trees (as noted previously by WLCA). The trees' 4 neighbors 615, 616, regrowth to date since the illegal pruning has been pitiful at best, and the trees residing west of 617, 618, are expected to remain in a state of severe canopy damage with only minimal the Vallco 619, 620, 621 chance of recovery to their prior condition ratings. Decline of the trees'vigor property line (new growth) and/or a reduction in longevity in the landscape due directly to this (in 2019) illegal pruning is likely. Areas that now have active running temporary irrigation via over-grade PVC piping and Salco flexible UV-resistant PVC include the following: a. Stevens Creek Blvd.trees (evergreen ash trees along the landscape Swale along the north side of the street), between North Wolfe Road and West Perimeter Road. 3 bubblers per each tree, each emitting up to 60 fluid ounces per minute, per my volumetric flow testing 8/29/2020. As of November, 2021, the system is set to run 3x/week for 30 minutes per activation, for a total of +/- 337 gallons of irrigation water application, per tree, per month, which is far greater than would be normally provided to typical ornamental shade trees. b. North Wolfe Road trees, both west and east sides of street, between Temporary Stevens Creek Blvd. and freeway 280. (same 3-bubbler setup for each timer-activated tree, and same timer-activated frequency and duration for water delivery 5 irrigation ( )Various as noted above). system West side of N.Wolfe Road trees were noted to have roughly 70% to installation 100% relative soil moisture between Stevens Creek and the flyway, areas which has now been demolished as of April 15, 2020. Turf grass growth is seen in the planting areas surrounding the ash trees along the west side of N.Wolfe Road, indicating that excellent soil moisture is being provided by the over-grade irrigation system. As of 6/25/2020, the SHPCO team has spread wood chips as mulch skirts around these trees. The skirts are 2 feet in width, and offset approximately 1 foot from trunk edges to avoid moisture buildup on the trunk bark surfaces. As of December, 2020, most or all Vallco trees have new mulch skirts in place. As of 7/10/21, all of the street trees along N. Wolfe Road are receiving irrigation via surface piping and '/2"diameter flood bubblers, including a few that are planned removals in front of Bowlmoor area. c. Sycamore island grouping of trees#260, 261, 262 on N.Wolfe Road (west side)was transplanted in July, 2021. 11 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmr(a)vahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A LINE ITEM TREE TAG NUMBER DESCRIPTION NUMBERS NOTES / LOCATION AFFECTED d. West Perimeter Road (WPR)trees: Multiple rows of evergreen ash trees and coast redwood trees along the west side of the roadway, between Stevens Creek Blvd and the north end of the Vallco project near the Freeway 280 southbound off-ramp. Soil moisture is roughly 70 to 100% field capacity as of November, 2021. In early 2020, redwoods#611 through #621 were illegally pruned in the proposed joint trench area by a tree care company The tree care company literally shaved off the entire west sides of the trees' canopies, from top of property boundary wall to the tops of the trees (as noted previously by WLCA). The trees' regrowth to date since the illegal pruning has been pitiful at best, and the trees are expected to remain in a state of severe canopy damage with only minimal chance of recovery to their prior condition ratings. Decline of the trees'vigor (new growth) and/or a reduction in longevity in the landscape due directly to this illegal pruning is likely. e. East Perimeter Road (EPR) trees along the Apple Inc. property boundary are all now irrigated via flex tubing running along grade, as of October, 2019. Tree root zone soil here is 70-100%field capacity as of November, 2021, and visibly very moist. The trees appear to have better vigor(canopy twig and foliage growth) than in previous years, likely due to the heavy irrigation they have been receiving via the over-grade irrigation water supply system. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Author's Side Note:WLCA uses a site-calibrated Lincoln soil moisture meter/probe during each site visit(1x/month)to test soil moisture of many of the streetside trees being protected and retained at the Vallco properties. Results indicated that the soil maintain generally 70%to 100% relative soil moisture in the vicinities of the high flow type flood bubblers which are activated multiple times per week along the ash and redwood tree root zones. During summer and fall periods when daytime temperatures climb into the 80's, 90's, and 100's Fahrenheit, WLCA confirms with the Vallco project team to ensure that the irrigation systems are active and running. 12 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmr(a)vahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A Areas with RPZ fencing now include all of the following: a. West perimeter road, west side of road (previously installed). b. Stevens Creek Blvd. between North Wolfe Road and West Perimeter Road (previously installed). c. North Wolfe Road, north-south oriented line of trees, (the westmost row Chain link Root only), abutted up against the Bay Club parking lot. This is a new area of 6 Protection Zone (Various) tree fencing protection. The City of Cupertino has apparently requested (RPZ) Fencing that we do not install protection along the sidewalk row of trees, in order to maintain the area with a natural, "non-industrial"appearance. The sidewalk along the west side of N.Wolfe Road is currently accessible by pedestrians almost the entire distance from Stevens Creek Blvd to the North end of the Vallco project. d. North Wolfe Road, both sides of road, between the demolished flyway bridge and freeway 280 (i.e. Alexander Steakhouse trees, and TGIF trees). Areas with trunk buffer wraps and wood overlay now include all of the following: a. West Perimeter Road trees that are adjacent to the west side of the roadway. b. North Wolfe Road trees that are adjacent to the old Alexander Steak House (east side of road). Trunk Buffer c. North Wolfe Road trees that are adjacent to the old TGI Fridays 7 Wraps with (Various) restaurant (west side of road). Wood Board Overlay d. North Wolfe Road discretionary transplants 260, 261. e. North Wolfe Road street trees south of the flyway bridge (i.e. along the old AMC movie theatre and Dynasty restaurant area), west side of street, only as far south as the old Bay Club parking lot entrance. f. Required transplant oaks#97, 98, 99 at the southwest corner of the Vallco site. The following tree areas have now been pruned by Tree Tech of San Jose, a tree service contractor,for horizontal and vertical roadway airspace clearance: a. (Early 2019):West Perimeter Road trees being retained along the west Pruning for side of the road (pruned earlier in 2019). Roadway& b. (August, 2019): East perimeter Road trees being retained along the east 8 Pathway (Various) side of the road. Airspace Clearance c. (September, 2019): Stevens Creek Blvd. ash trees, the northmost row overhanging the old Bay Club parking lot. d. (September, 2019): Trees along both sides of North Wolfe Road between Stevens Creek Blvd. and freeway 280. 13 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmr(a)vahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A e. (October, 2019): Trees along the north side of Stevens Creek Blvd, both the row overhanging the Bay Club parking lot and the row overhanging the westbound lane along the north side of Stevens Creek Blvd. f. (October, 2019): The N.Wolfe Road median trees. g. (May, 2020): Live wood and foliage in the lower elevations of the canopies of redwood and ash tree specimens along West perimeter Road is being removed as an on-going process to clear the airspace of the north-south oriented walking path that extends north-south in orientation, parallel with the roadway. WLCA and SHPCO discussed adding wood chip mulch skirts to the areas surrounding all Vallco site trees, in 2019. This work was completed over the course of a 1 year period, for all or almost all trees owned by Vallco, as of December, 2020. The stockpile of wood chips is being held at the south end of East Perimeter Road, and is spread over Mulching with time as more and more chips derived from site pruning and tree removal Wood Chips operations are available to the SHPCO crew. 9 Derived from (Various) I have advised the crew to keep the chips pushed out 1 or 2 feet offset Pruning from the trunk edges of each tree. Operations by Tree Tech. By February 2021, the crew has essentially mulched every single redwood and ash tree being retained throughout the entire Vallco site. At this point in Winter 2021, the crew is adding additional mulch to areas around trees, such that the skirts are ever-widened and thickened from their original dimensions in 2020, which is appropriate and beneficial as a long term tree root zone Best Management Practice. a. Ash tree#50 at the east end of the row of trees overhanging Stevens Creek Blvd recently declined (see photo below in this report). WLCA suggested that SHPCO prune out deadwood throughout the tree's canopy and monitor it to determine if it is still viable. The tree has now been pruned as of October, 2019. 2021 b. Ash tree#673 at the "bend" in West Perimeter Road where utility trenching occurred in 2019. This tree was noted elsewhere in this report Trees to monitor as a specimen in decline that exhibits less than normal current season's for live twig density. 10 decline/death See right c. Ash tree#763 on West Perimeter Road. Decline in this tree was noted overtime, or earlier in 2019 by WLCA. Tree Tech pruned the tree to reduce its height, simply remove and the tree is now"retrenching"with renewed vigorous sprout growth outright for throughout the lower elevations (see photos below in this report). As of safety purposes. October, 2019, this tree is extending profuse new shoots and dense foliage as of October, 2019. As of 4/15/2020 the tree exhibits a dense canopy of new shoot and foliage growth. As of 5/15/2020 SHPCO plans to prune out lower elevation branches to 14 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmr(a)vahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A clear the airspace around this tree. d. Redwood #804 just northwest of#763 on West Perimeter Road is developing a large number of dead and dying scaffold limbs throughout the canopy. The tree may need to be removed outright at some point in the near future. As of 5/15/2020, the neighbor just west of this tree apparently pruned out a large number of the dead scaffold limbs without permission, and allowed those branches to fall into our Vallco property area where they are now laying in the pathway between the redwood tree row and the ash tree row(see photos at end of this report). e. Redwoods#852, 853, 854, 855, 856 at West Perimeter Road, illegally pruned in late 2020 by the neighbors residing to the west of the Vallco property line. As noted in ROW 1AA above in this tree table, some of these trees are dead or near-dead as of March, 2021, and now represent a high risk of failure and impact with ground targets, and will need to be completely removed for safety purposes. f. Redwoods #628 and #668.West Perimeter Road. g. Various trees near the PG&E vault work recently completed along West Perimeter Road (see separate vault area table below). h. UPDATE 11/30/2020: Redwoods#846 to#871 along West Perimeter Road which were illegally shear-pruned along the north-south property line retaining wall airspace in October, 2020, by neighbors on Denison Avenue and Wheaton Drive to the West. See above in this table for full details. These trees are expected to decline over time as a direct result of this pruning work which severely degraded the west sides of the canopies of these 26 tree specimens. i. Giant sequoias#430 &#434 (street trees) need to be remove ASAP. The following is the table prepared by WLCA in January 2019 for the trees immediately surrounding the PG&E high voltage electrical underground upgrade work by Devcon that occurred in January 2019. The table was updated in April, 2019 based on WLCA's reassessment 4/26/19. Trees considered high risk or potentially high risk of failure and impact with ground targets are noted in the table with bold black and yellow highlight. 15of24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmr(a)vahoo.com Walter Levison AL CONSULTING ARB4R15T ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A PG&E VAULT AREA TREES/WEST PERIMETER ROAD Many of the below trees have rebounded with increased vigor(in terms of live twig extension lengths, live foliar density), as a direct result of Vallco project team's use of heavy irrigation water volume year-round. The trees that appear to have failed to rebound are noted as suggested removals in WLCA's latest version of the List of Dead and Dying Trees (11/15/2021) submitted to the Vallco team. Tree Tag Actual Root Plate Radius Remaining Number Overall Condition Rating (Measured in Feet,on WLCA Suggests Removal of Tree (South to (updates) Trench Face or Vault North) Excavation Side) 729 10 (feet) 727 8 724 6 10% Very Poor Potential removal 722 6 10% Very Poor Potential removal 721 6 10% Very Poor Potential removal 716 4 35% Poor Potential removal 714 3 15% Very Poor Potential removal 713 4 50% Fair 712 8 48% Poor 711 8 0% DEAD Suggest removal due to lack of vigor 710 8 50% Fair 708 6 25% Very Poor Potential removal 707 6 10%Very Poor Suggest removal due to lack of vigor 706 6 25% Very Poor Potential removal 734 (ash) 4 Potential removal. Monitor for decline or instability. 735 (ash) 4 Potential removal. Monitor for decline or instability. 736 (ash) 5 Potential removal. Monitor for decline. 737 (ash) 6 Potential removal. Monitor for decline. 738 (ash) 6 Potential removal. Monitor for decline. 739 (ash) 3 Potential removal. Monitor for decline or instability. 673 _______ Very Poor live twig density/extension as of Monitor for continued decline. 6/25/2020. 16of24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell (415)203-0990 Email walterslevison r(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A Tree Tag Actual Root Plate Number Radius Remaining Overall Condition Rating (Measured in Feet,on WLCA Suggests Removal of Tree (South to (updates) Trench Face or Vault North) Excavation Side Very Poor. PGE excavation work encroached to within 1 foot of the root zone, within the I suggest we remove the tree at 674 (ash) 1 Critical Root Zone (CRZ), possibly resulting in this time for loss of roughly 30 to 40%of the original root system. I suggest removal of this tree for safety purposes. safety purposes. 65% Fair. Nice large redwood specimen of 30 inches diameter. Total root loss of as much as 20% or more, and recent trenching occurred within the 15 foot radius (Critical Root Zone) in 651 6-7 one quadrant of the root zone. Expect good survival, and little or no loss of stability, since excavation occurred only in the northeast section of the tree's root zone, and did not extend south of the trunk. 38% Poor. Tree exhibits extensive needle dieback 650 6-7 that is not related to the recent PGE vault excavation work within the east side of the tree's root zone. 649 7 50% Fair 648 10 30% Poor. Tree suppressed in shade of surrounding larger specimens. 65% Fair. Nice specimen of large proportions with 32 inch diameter trunk situated next to the Devcon Construction lockable chain link gate at the north end of Demolition Zone 1A. Critical Root Zone is 16 feet radius. Recent 647 8 to 10 feet trenching destroyed roots in the northmost half of this CRZ (i.e. within 8 to 10 feet of the trunk edge). Some possible loss of tree stability. Monitor tree for symptoms of decline or instability (e.g. soil cracking, trunk lean off from vertical, loss of vigor expressed as needle dieback, etc.). 646 7 40% Poor Suggest root crown excavation (RCX) using hand tools to remove excess soil plied over the buttress 645 6 to 7 feet 40% Poor root flares. This tree actually appears to be getting strangled by roots extending from ash tree #680 directly east from#645. 17 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmr(a)vahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A Tree Tag Actual Root Plate Number Radius Remaining Overall Condition Rating (Measured in Feet,on WLCA Suggests Removal of Tree (South to (updates) Trench Face or Vault North) Excavation Side Suggest remove tree for safety purposes. Tree is at southeast corner of the new north-south oriented vault excavation area. As of June, 2021, this tree still remains in the landscape with 678 (ash) 1 foot High Risk 1 foot of radial root extension between the vault excavation face and the trunk edge, and exhibits very poor live twig density and extension. This tree currently exhibits some of the worst live twig density of the ash specimens in this portion of the site. WLCA recommends removal of the tree. 679 (ash) 0 feet High Risk (Removed as of 2019). Potential removal for safety 680 (ash) 2 feet Possible High Risk purposes due to trench cut at 2 feet offset from buttress root edges. Remove now, or monitor. 18 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmr(a)vahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST Jig ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A Below: Digital Images Archived by WLCA Summer, 2021 + 9/24/2021 Figure 7-12 Typical soil moisture pattern under surface drip irrigation,showing salt accumulation at the surface of the soil volume wetted by each emitter A 45 minute bubbler activation duration may result in a hypothetically better soil moisture plume that looks something like this,with deeper reach in terms of depth, due to better saturation of the uppermost elevations, A 15 minute irrigation bubbler Lateral spacing resulting in a gravitational downward flow of water that results in a deeper plume reaching further into the activation duration may result in a Emitter deepest section of the trees'motable soil volume,which is hypothetical shallow soil moisture plume SUrraCe typically about 4 feet depth in clay soils al ng the that looks something like this. ninsula_ 1 Salt accumulation Mow line Moisture contour Deep percolation From USDA Naiional Engineering Wetted width Handbook(2013).Section on "Microirrigation". This is a marked-up image from USDA's National Engineering Handbook (2013) section on micro-irrigation is a good illustration of how"irrigation plumes" of moisture percolate downward from a flood bubbler, into various soil profile elevations. WLCA expects that the increase in irrigation duration to 45 minutes (as of today Sept 28, 2020)will increase the bubbler plume depths in terms of how deep water percolates via gravity. It is hypothesized that the longer run times and less frequent activations result in the Vallco site trees receiving more water to deeper depths than previously available to the lowermost elevation roots. The goal is to provide as much available water to the trees as possible, while simultaneously conserving water by reducing overall output given to the trees each month. Notice in the plume diagram how the surface stays dry between each bubbler, which means that when using a soil moisture meter probe between each bubbler, the readings may indicate relatively dry soil conditions, even though beneath each bubbler is a deep plume of moisture where irrigation water has percolated directly downward via gravity. Note that these plumes are not at all visible from the surface, as the actual coverage is minimal from any one point source of water(i.e. any one bubbler), limiting the ability for a person observing irrigation systems to"see"what is actually occurring below grade elevation. Thus, the former turf grass along N. Wolfe Road and along Stevens Creek Blvd. is all desiccated for the most part now, due to the spaces between the irrigation bubblers that do not receive regular water. The important thing to note is that, however dry the surface may appear in a bubbler-irrigated landscape, it does not indicate the actual subsurface soil moisture status of the tree root zone below ground. 19of24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmra yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A IF L- 8/16/2021 Core extraction at Stevens Creek. The moisture in the uppermost half foot of the soil profile is perfect, and live healthy white tree roots see in this core indicate that the tree in this case is under a good cultural care regime with adequate water(at least in that uppermost section of the soil profile. Additions of more wood chip mulch might be warranted to reduce soil moisture loss from evaporation at the soil surface. WLCA tested soil moisture using an AMS soil core The tool could not penetrate deeper than about 6 inches extractor along Stevens Creek on 8/16/21. The device below grade, so WLCA could not fully verify whether the could only penetrate roughly 6 inches below grade, but deeper areas of the ash tree root systems were receiving soil in that uppermost half foot was at 100%field capacity adequate soil moisture from bubbler irrigation or not. see additional image at right). 20 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmr(a)vahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST O1r- ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A ta. F � a i AY �� 8/16/21: Ash specimens in the median just south of 280 freeway. ■ 8/16/21: Looking southward from Bowlmoor at the ash specimens along the east side of Wolfe Road. The uppermost elevations of the canopies exhibit foliar loss, but it is not entirely clear if this loss was due to twigs already dead from extended soil moisture deficit, or if it is recent leaf drop such as summertime "early senescence" where trees drop leaves due to drought (soil moisture deficit). It could be a combination of both twig death and early leaf drop, all related to ongoing droughty California weather conditions. 21 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmra yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST 1O1r- ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A 131 Mau Ash trees along N. Wolfe Road at the old steakhouse North end of West Perimeter Road where joint trench work area, looking north. This is the zone where a 2020 covid continues as of September, 2021. The northmost end is period homeless encampment was located, until it was now fully trenched and mulched. The southmost end recently removed by County of Santa Clara officials. (where WLCA was standing to take this image) is still only partially covered with wood chips because there is ongoing site work in this portion of the Vallco site. 22 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmra yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A J� r •fir New high flow type irrigation installed around discretionary New high flow type irrigation installed along various ash transplant sycamores 414, 415, 416. specimens along the N. Wolfe Road street frontage portion of Bowlmoor bowling alley facility. Assumptions and Limiting Conditions Any legal description provided to the consultant/appraiser is assumed to be correct.Any titles and ownership to any property are assumed to be good and marketable.No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character.Any and all property is appraised and evaluated as through free and clean, under responsible ownership and competent management. It is assumed that any property is not in violation of any applicable codes,ordinance,statutes,or other government regulations. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible; however,the consultant/appraiser can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. The consultanUappraiser shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for such services as described in the fee schedule and contract of engagement. Unless required by law otherwise,the possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any other purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed,without the prior expressed written or verbal consent of the consultant/appraiser. Unless required by law otherwise, neither all nor any part of the contents of this report,nor copy thereof,shall be conveyed by anyone,including the client,to the public through advertising, public relations,news,sales,or other media,without the prior expressed conclusions, identity of the consultant/appraiser, or any reference to any professional society or institute or to any initiated designation conferred upon the cons ultant/appraiser as stated in his qualifications. This report and any values expressed herein represent the opinion of the cons ultantappraiser, and the consultant's/appraiser's fee is in no way contingent upon the reporting of a specified value, a stipulated result,the occurrence of a subsequent event, nor upon any finding to be reported. 23 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmr(a)vahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A Sketches,drawings, and photographs in this report,being intended for visual aids,are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering or architectural reports or surveys unless expressed otherwise.The reproduction of any information generated by engineers,architects, or other consultants on any sketches,drawings,or photographs is for the express purpose of coordination and ease of reference only. Inclusion of said information on any drawings or other documents does not constitute a representation by Walter Levison to the sufficiency or accuracy of said information. Unless expressed otherwise: information contained in this report covers only those items that were examined and reflects the conditions of those items at the time of inspection;the inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible items without dissection, excavation,probing,or coring. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied,that problems or deficiencies of the plants or property in question may not arise in the future. Loss or alteration of any part of this report invalidates the entire report. Arborist Disclosure Statement: Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge,training, and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees,and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees.Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or to seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree.Tree are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand.Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground.Arborist cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise,remedial treatments,like any medicine,cannot be guaranteed. Treatment, pruning,and removal of trees may involve considerations beyond the scope of the arborist's services such as property boundaries, property ownership,site lines,disputes between neighbors,and other issues.Arborists cannot take such considerations into account unless complete and accurate information is disclosed to the arborist.An arborist should then be expected to reasonably rely upon the completeness and accuracy of the information provided. Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled.To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk.The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate the trees. Certification I hereby certify that all the statements of fact in this report are true,complete,and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief,and are made in good faith. Signature of Consultant Walter Levison, Consulting Arborist DIGITAL BADGES: ISA CERTIFIED ARBORIST CREDENTIAL: httgs://certificates.isa-arbor.corn/d180515f-ab75-440b-9c66-106005e3cf10?record view=true#gs.hoaw8u ISA TREE RISK ASSESSMENT QUALIFIED (TRAQ): httgs://certificates.isa-arbor.corn/d180515f-ab75-440b-9c66-106005e3cf10?record view=true#gs.hr)b30w Attached: 1. Tree Map (OLIN), Full Site 2. Tree Data Table (WLCA) (Latest Update: 7/10/2021) 24 of 24 Walter Levison©2021 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonmr(a)vahoo.com 1 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 g 1 10 1 LEGEND APPLE - - PROPERTY LINE \ - - PROPERTY LINE AFTER DEDICATION (NOT IN SCOPE) - GARAGE EXTENTS TOWN CENTER STRUCTURE r , STRUCTURE ABOVE L-----J A TREE PROTECTION AREA - - OWNER-VALLCO PROPERTY OWNER LLC. 965 PAGE MILL ROAD, PALO ALTO,CA 94304 CHAINLINK TREE PROTECTION FENCE T.650-344-1500 ARCHITECTURE-RAFAEL VINOLY ARCHITECTS TAG# 50 VANDAM STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10013 T.212-924-5060 EXISTING STANDARD TREE TO REMAIN 334 �0 � <v TAG# ARCHITECTURE033 NWO FE ROAD CU EIRTOLY I 0 CA 950E�TS EXISTING STANDARD TREE TO BE REMOVED 374 T.408 627-7090 co _ co co LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE-OLIN PARTNERSHIP LTD. J N rn d Ln c I ao rn O c� cr Lo u') coo N N N N h� N CS) O c7 c7 �r M co M M M N M r�N CSJ O c\1 Ln L(� CO Lf) CO N (O co m co N N LnN �i N M cn M �� �� M n Lj, �,I �r v _ ;n �� c� n f) , o o o o 1 l ? ? TAG# 150 S, INDEPENDENCE MALL W.SUITE 1123, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106 "' —cam - - .,Lo -- — \ \ EXISTING TREE 11 ' �a �� �� "� �' - T.214 440-0030 N \ ` \ \ ` \ \- \ •\ \ \ `\` i 'lIrl �i \ \ ` ` \\` \ ` ` \ ` \ ` TO BE TRANSPLANTED M \ _ ( , \ ` ` ` ` `� `\ ` `\ _ x ` :\ ` `_ ` ` CIVIL-SANDIS CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS, INC. 177777L \,,�7 Ncli \ \ \� % low v E M Lo \\ \ \ \ J\\ TAG# 1700 S.WINCHESTER BLVD,SUITE 200, CAMPBELL,CA 95008 ti °, �, L Ln �� n a, T.408-636-0900 co M co M �; M ("� (v�j M M M c�� M �+�j cn M ' �n o v rn �' °o �,\\�, \ \� oo\\ DEVELOPMENT TREE TO BE REMOVED 90 N� M M co\M .rti.M M� M` - �e coM��r� /'\ Xti M Ci) °° O V W W �/ \ \ - D. X F - TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING ARUP NORTH AMERICA, LT M X Ij x x x x x x x x f X " TAG# 560 MISSION STREET,SUITE 700,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94105 G �� (xp _N1� x II II II II II II II I EXISTING STREET TREE TO REMAIN 113 M X x l al \ T.415 957-9445 V LC) OM x _ O N` ` M C3 x TAG# LIGHTING ONE LUX STUDIO x ,, 158 WEST 29TH STREET, 10TH FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10001 \ I EXISTING STREET TREE TO BE REMOVED 73 M O `.�,cl) _ x x ;r, I T.212-201-5790 �^ �1 B N co C SIGNAGE-EX:IT X' "' L,� .r-� I � TOTAL TREE 995 1617 JFK BLVD, SUITE 1665, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 cn N N a LO X T.215-561-1950 o Ln \ M `� � • � "' ` PARKING ENGINEERING-WATRY DESIGN, INC. �, r. M � �•Lr, ,n I x -1127 2099 GATEWAY PLACE, SUITE 550,SAN JOSE,CA 95110 o x FOR DETAILS OF EXISTING TREE CONDITIONS,SEE ARBORIST REPORT, T.408-392-7900 u') DATED JUNE 14,2019,PREPARED BY WALTER LEVISON,CONSULTING o o yy p ARBORIST(WLCA). � u') M LC) ® 7 8 / M M Lo ® I TREE PROTECTION ARE PROVIDED BASED ON ARBORIST TREE _ PROTECTION RECOMMENDATIONS, IN CHAPTER 11.0. CD ® I � 29 N`'X"� NOT IN SCOPE . . . . . . . ® N �— X EXISTING BUILDING ® b M co —I N I � / b b O 30 co N M V co / O // O cw C ®®® O � M co M O m M m J a N ( x e I J O n M - X O r ( x } - v y ° ° 1131 M HYATT HO EL O M2 ," T_ ° I � t b (NOT INS OPE) M r M M o o o � m co Q c v O M II II II II C M 1132 a 0 IIp�I IIp�I IIp�I �IpII �IpII �IpII IIp�I �IpII �IpII ® c M CV II II II II II II II II II o X I � 13(o � b v I D EXITING BUILDING L I 1 X co � - �, cy'j - \x x O `hco \ \, X X \ \ `` \ \• \ \ \ \ \ \ III rn \ \ \ \ \\\ \\\\ \\\\\\ \\\ \\ \ \\ \ \\\ \ III I I I I _ vIF - - _ r _ _ IIII o ��' � co co co - r, = PROPERTY LINE H- � - - PROPERTY LINE AFTER DEDICATION .s co o rn 6' co M -GARAGE EXTENTS - a o o N WOLFE ROAD X v VVOLFE ROAD X 4 — — - o 04 N c- O - - - - - - - - - O O O `- co co W CN com " '� co C.O CO O M O V M r- 00 N O I� N ~ T- N It NLf-S -•-m(O 1� _O0. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \ \ \ r- \ '\ \ \ \ \ F \ �\\ N N N N N N N N N 04 N IIIIII IIIII \ \ ` T ,y \ N l PROPERTY LINE N N M /�`^—, 6� `^ \ ^ 1 LSD 1 x O <1 \ \ \ \ t i I I \ \ \ '\ \ \ ' ` \ •\ \ \ \ •\ \ \ \ GARAGE EXTENTS N W co N N °o M - PROPERTY LINE AFTER CT) W _ E I I I Irn AM CD c� ` N b C� "` V N `J� ((• udlViilirt;; M Cfl x 1 Lo m X N JC � r x v X O o O O O O � � �7 . C O \ \ rn ,1N K Yb O o _\o U EXISTING Qc ° ° O ° o ° ° � ° �i� ♦ r,, co O 4 � c X l N BUILDING ,�N x �, i pp xco �M N \ O O O O O O O O T T T O ' O O O ° V - V \` (O c) O O M M X C:i X CO \ \ Lo ' M /` � �^ M O �'\ �1 O O f x 1 �y M O x c0 _ � _ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ° _ \` N ° • • � o o � b � �, �, M� �, x N o EXISTI ILD1N 0 X DISCLAIMER N n' �' N N N Lo N O • • • x m THE ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SHALL HAVE NO RESPONSIBILITY co \ FOR ANY LIABILITY, LOSS,COST, DAMAGE OR EXPENSE ARISING ® O o ° ® I ° / N ° 0 0 o m • o ° ° • • • • p p ° M ~ !M PURPOSE OT ER HAON ITS INTENDED PURPOSE ON THIS ANY x co co PROJECT. THIS DOCUMENT IS TO BE CONSIDERED IN �I • • • • • • CONJUNCTION WITH ALL RELATED DOCUMENTATION.ANY & DISCREPANCIES IDENTIFIED IN THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p® ® ® ®I ® I • 0 0 0 N \ REPORTED IMMEDIATELY TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE F u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u u® ®I ° ° ° ° ° o ° ° x g �, X co M PROCEEDING. CONTRACTORS MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS x "' \ PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY WORK.ONLY FIGURED ® I • • • ° • • "' x DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR VERIFICATION. WOLFE PROPERTIES LLC EXISTING GARAGE ° ° ° ° ° ° O �� \ (NO TIN SCOPE) I � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � N ° • • • ° � x M II II I I II II II II II II II II ®� � EXISTI ILDI x O N e II II II II Ll Y II II II Y II II Y \ ® ® ® ® ® ® ® 0 0 o B �B O 177111 l rn ® o- a- • o • • 1 O p N ` SB-35 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Fc-, rn\`-X rn XIII � � � � � � � � � N � //�f/\\ v co CO x N N M M M M X X oO c��7 ._\ c0 O O O N x N X O X p) X N N co N ��_x X \,_x/ \�\/ ,. �_ II N M c I� 1 x I M_ t x q\ \ x ri 'L ` .- 4� • x yj x �,u � 0 0 0 0 o x N rr i -� -�- -,� ( '\ LL M N"' QL{', �EF�IME E D. rn •- co Q __ _ 1) P b N \ REV DESCRIPTION DATE \ \ \ \ O O 6) O t° CO CO CO N O � .,. �-r M N m O � a - O CO co \ 6) 6) °O co °O co °O � 00 �p 65 I� °O I� �-�_s � —� P' o — ` ` `� `0 `o `� o `� _ a J REV-0 SB 35 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 03127/2018 X REV-1 SB-35 APPLICATION REVISIONS 08/06/2018 • \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �1 \ \ REV-2 SB-35 APPLICATION CONFORM SET 09/15/2018 FT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 44 0 a a a X pp x o rn W \ Lh VMN NM VLO(Of-W 6)Or-NM «,t0 f�°00 ,` - \ \ O) J�7 O O \\., /)/ \ W cococo L h� I�h�l�h�l� h�WW WW • OT-'VMVLI)(Dh�W6)O� coVIf)(ph�co CD_" �Lo(O h-W6)O lf�c01�°000r-N lfJ CO I oO O� II O _ M co WWW Lf') Lf, tf)Lf7lf)Lf)Lf') l(,Lnln Lf)Lf) COW W WW Cn Ch CS)ChCnCS)Ch6)00 OOOOOOOr-r-r- O•-N MV"-fl CO f�oO NM V 1� Lo Lo Lo LL) c. Ln Lo Lf') LI)Lf7lf)LL)Lf7LI)LI)(O(O COCO(OCpC0C0(OCOCO(p (OCOCO COCOCOCO CO NNNNNMMM M M MM V•7V VVV V VV 0p Ln LNC')'(T L0C-0f-- W °)Or- Lr)c CO(OCOCO(O(OCOcO (O (O CO CO CO CO CO(OCO CO COCO �� COcococo CO CO CC CO CO(OCOCOCO COCOLJ- WCO(O� .- .. .. G IIIIII \ \\\\\\ a U INSTALL TREE R ECTION FENCIN AS P ROVED N Z J RIST OR CIT A BORIST o !, W \ .. \ N G GE- CD y 3 � \ \ (n 11 12 \ 10 9 0 EXISTING BUILDING J 122 �N \\` x co `\ N.WOLFE ROAD I� •\ \. T 121 \ o (h 3 w x - \ oz �� a _ �; \` 1 w N rn� M ��� I �I I IM M I I 216 o O co M __ I� ICI 1215 LF cl_�N N x\ ti `� Y x X X M KEY PLAN AND NORTH ARROW (V \ r- _ p p T- c- \ X I 1 O i Yfi PETGli4iTTE�\Y c�B. 6) co I� W Ln X 04 LID, I- ARCHITECTS PROJECT NUMBER 708011 04 x Lo x ` \\•` \� \\\` \ \� '` ` ` \\ ` ` \\ ` ` \ `\ ` `� \ \ z \ PROJECT PHASE: SB 35 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION \. \ ` \ \. ` \ \ \ N N� ' IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 36"x48"IT IS A REDUCED PRINT; __ ______ o `r .\\ v REFER TO GRAPHIC SCALE ' -cl) P_V LC r-r- 6)O�-VM 000000 f0W6)O•-NM VL mol)W°)Or- NMV «)(p1�W r-N MVL[XOf�W O�NM�r Lf)(OI�W Or-N MVIf)(O h- O� O_N M�Lo(fll� (mcD -" MVL[)(DI- 6) Co- CO (Wp 1� - NM I�h� h�h�h�h� IOW W WWW WWW6XT0)(3) CTJCS)6)CnCS)O)00 000 0000 O NNNNN NNCVN c1) MMMM M M VVV VVVVV hVl[)Lf)Lf) 1.01-OLOLOLn Lc) ll W W W W W W �ti �ti tiltiti hl`h t- ��ti I`I`I-I-I-I-I- 1`I-I-I`I-I-WW WWW WWWW 00000000 WWWWWW WWWWW WWWW WWW WWWW W W WWW WWWWW WWWW WWWWW W W 0 32' 64' 128' 192' SCALE: 1/64"=1'-0" EAST WEST B N DE NZA PROPERTIES (NOT IN SCO E) TREE PROTECTION PLAN VALLCO OT IN SCOPE— CD = SHEET TITLE: P � 0602A SHEET NUMBER: I © 2018 RAFAELVINOLY ARCH ITECTSPCI Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA - @ IT - c cw m E m E'c f z a x' Sciantif Nama L - $ o= 2 9 m- mm+ v '< w e E y WLCA Notae from UPdatetl Overall Contlhlon x Ea& $'-rc r c y n - m Common Name - o n c - n m w E �- a Ratings 8 NOTES 201] y =a c c c c c _ _m„ m w.c (Genoa,aPedea) a: m mow c - c a - a -_ mm u SPdng 2015 Survey L�gwi'+m+ .a i4 tee as ra°Ow g Yc c- cumO ._ ONWARD SEod-' Ea or X 13.0 13.0 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhde/ 30N6 2W30 poor 6 11 X Removetl as dJan,20 poor 2 X 10.9 10.9 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhde/ 2.20 S-S 40%poor matlerate T Removed as aJan,202 3 X 13.8 13.9 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhde/ 30125 6DI45 50%fair matlerate Removed as aJan,2020. 4 X 16.6 16.6 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhde/ 35130 5SI60 5]%fir matlerate Removed as dJan,2020. 5 X 22.0 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhde/ 45145 ]5160 fib%fir gootl 12 Removed as aJan,2020. 6 13.3 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhde/ 35115 S0I35 43%poor matlerate Removed as aJan,2020. Monterey in P/nos radi.. 55130 65165 65%fair matlerate Removed as d Jan,2020. A Mill Tree appears[o be declining in Ned—dwelght U.twig density tlue[o 6 X MeMeSM1amel asM1 F inua uM1dei 55/30 7— 64%fair matlerete W retludlon pruning Prolonged Bay Area drought onditiona.Cumentcondi5mis Capp—i—iy 40%or"pool'. 9 X 26.2 26.2 SIN amel ash F inua uwm 55/40 60/50 55%falr poor to mod GR Needaendweight red.dian pmning Tree appears to be tlecllning In live twig density tlue W 10 27.0 27.0 SIN amel ash F inua uAdw w" OwN 55%falr poor to motl N prolonged Bay Area tlrought onditiona.Current condition Is aapproximately 40%or"pool'. Tree appear to bm tlecllning In Ilvm twig tlmnalty tlue to 11 X 28.8 28.8 SIN amel ash F inua uhdei 55/30 a— 60%falr motleroro S GR prolongetl Bay Area tlrought contlltlona.Current con WWI-is approximately 37%or"pool'. rea aPPeare rang m live twig tlensity tlue W prolonged Bay Area drought 12 20.2 20.2 SIN amel ash F inua We W25 55/50 53%fair poor to mod E condition.Current conditim is approximately 25%or"very pool'.Trees in very paw ontlition are generally Tree appears to be tlecllning In Ilve twig density due W 13 X 22.2 32.2 SIN amel ash F inua uhtld 55/25 60/50 55%falr poor to mod S prolonged Bay Area drought contlXbna.Current condldm Is aPProxi—ly 37%or"poop. 1 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA Ea o'8°Y 8 °rY �p E a _ ;- r=• o. ^' common Name ScientRc Name _ _ »�sa a 2 (Genus,sPeciea) 2j ae`d W na u; m c 5 UPtlatetl Overall Condition @@ WLCA Notae from u a ° ,° n _3 c d o a c Ya!7 rc m '- m g Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 and `oc •�4 °e .FSw gg g o dptf gg cEa{o— Pnng 20153urvoy a c4 o.-n a8 2 2d�PO6P co W! S¢¢ Eppp a�P$ n@ "@ 8�W nY �WU^8 dlu EcRb$ 8o ONWARD iae �d �ZG° 14 Tree appears[o be declinmg In 24.T L.T Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhdd 60/28 60160 60Yo fair raw.nde N live twig density tlue to Prolonged Bay area drought 'ontlitione.Cumnt condition is approximately 40%or"p- is 24.6 24.6 Shemelaeh Fraxlnus hobi 6a30 6a45 55%fa'u motlerete N 16 Shamel asM1 Fraxlnus uhdel Tree appears to be tleclining in 20.6 20.6 sign Mir 55%fair mw..t. N IN.twig tlensity tlue to prolongetl Bay Area tlrought contl5ions.C-1 contlition is approximaely 42%or"poor'. 17 17.7 17.7 Shamel aeM1 Fraxlnus uhdel 45/25 ap 0%tla bear(not Trae appears to be tleclining in —brad) S "ninig tlensity tlue to proitions Bay Area diti [ wntlroaftn Cumnt contlition is approximaely 35°A or"poor'. 18 ash Fraxlnus uh.W Trae ap to be tleclining in 916 91.6 Shamel set" Wait %%fair motlerate N live twig pears tlensity tlue to OR 10.12 prolongetl Bay Area drought is onditiona.Current contlition capproximately 48%or"poor". 18 182 18.2 Shamel ash Faxlnus uhow Trae appears to be declining in 45as 6a50 0%fair motlerate 5 live twig tlensity tlue to prolongetl Bay Area tlrought 'ontlitione.Current contlition is approximately 35%or"p"r'. 26 21.5 21.5 steamer ash Fraxlnus uhow sass sou 55%rair ,oar to motl 21 17.0 17.0 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhow 35120 50160 55%Tair motlerWe S OR 3R3 32.3 Si Fulnus uhdel 55150 75/65 TO%Bootl gootl NE 29 29.5 29.5 Steamer ash Faxlnus uhtlW Tree appears to be tleclining in 55/30 65/90 W%fair motlende 5 30 OR live twig tlensity tlue to prolongetl Bay Area drought condition..Cunt contlition ie approximatelyrre 45%or"poor'. 24 29.7 28,7 shamN aah Fraxlrws hdel 55/00 65/50 60%fair moderate N OR 25 x 20.7 20.7 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhaw Tree appears to be Ee'Oniag in Sa30 Sa95 50%fair moderate SE l0 noua OR live twig tlensity tlue to prolongetl Bay Area tlrought is andiXona.cmrentcontlieon c approximately 50%or'fair'. 20 )! Tree appears to be tleclining in 26 .2 202 Shemet ash Fraxlnus uhdW 35135 5010 50%f4mir noderete N live twig tlensity tlue to r� prolongetl Bay Area tlrought ontlitione.Current contlition ie capproximately 95%or"poor'. 2 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA �S °coc m E m E'c f Y a x' Scientific Nema L - c$ o= Z $m- ym+ v 'c m e E y WLCA N+taa from Updatetl Overall 0.udkion rc r c - m Common Name $ o n- - c n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 x E y a $a c c c c c c _m" m m m (Genus,aPeciea) a: m mow c A c - c a ^ u Spring-5 Survey aAoa? m x x x i x x miG yg$ a a+ .a 'a gm as qa .Few up _ ns o� SE'w c&�o fr ._ ONWARD dEE$d= e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma 6SE~'g`o �a ids �2.� n 2 02 UOo 3g uf �' ¢c4awn a3 �'c.A uO�Ex °z Tree was significantly damagatl by a Cly-hired cautra.or performing di—Zonal bore and oMer electrical utility related work slang Stevens Creek Blvtl In June a.d July,2019.The 2] X 25.8 25.8 Shamal ash Frarinus uhdel 55/35 65/50 5]%falr madareN 8 mehowscarredthe lower t unk of this tree(see Image In WLCA's July,2019 Inspedlon reporu.However,the tree Is slated for removal anyway per the vatic.prole. Want tree tllsposl[lon sheet Tree appears to be tleclining In live twig tlensly tlue to 28 36.9 36.9 Shamal ash F inua uWW Own ]5/45 am fair good N OR prolongetl Bay Area tlrought co.difia s.Currant cardigan is approalmaroly 45Y.or"pas'. Tree appears to be tleclining In Ilve twig d—Iy tlue to 29 32.3 32.3 Shamal ash F inua uWW 60/35 TWO am fair good S OR prolonged Bay Area drought contlltlons.Cu—condlgm is approximately 50%or"tale. 30 29.5 29.5 Shamal ash F inua uWW 50/C0 BW55 am fair good NE Tree appears to be declining in Me twig density due to prolongetl Bay Area drought contlltlons.Current condition Is 31 x 6.3 6.3 Shamal ash Faxlnua hdal 16/10 wto 35%poor mad.raw S BRC Stan,atl app—l—taly 25%or"very Poor".Trees In very poor nerall c*"dltlon are g,n,-Il, .lderetl good cantlidatasfar oval from the lantlsaape, sI n aMelr abll to recover to 32 17.9 17.9 Shamal ash Feriae uadw W35 60/C0 am fair mad.— N Tree appears.be tleclining In live twig do-Iy tlue to 33 26.0 26.0 Shamal ash F inua urdw W35 OWN am fair mad.— OR Man— prolonged Bay Area tlrought contlltlons.Current condition Is approximately 00%or"Poor". Tree appear to ba tleclining In Tree out of leaf. a.twig tlensiy tlue to 34 34.0 34.0 Shamal ash F arinua uhdei 50/25 SO/CO 45%poor T S 9 CondMon prolongetl Bay Area tlrought eatimatad. contlltlons.Current cond0lau Is approximately 00%or"po '. 35 23.3 23.3 Shamal ash F inua urdw W25 60/55 am fair mad.— N 36 X 26.6 26.6 Shamal ash F inua urdw W45 OWN 63%fair mad.— 3] X 32.9 32.9 Shamal ash F inua urdw 6W35 TWO am fair good N 3 of 96 VaIIw Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA updated oeerag condition p E g a c N F Z ^ n Scientific Name u c g o n^ o u a^ q 3 n Bp��9 zo+su campy Ratings 6 NOTES 2017 m Comon Name c c — c gg E E o g ONWARD 1 g e' n e m a lu w W B d m 'p ^>3eF x x x a ¢rcA°can a3 30 x 182 182 SM1ame1a0 Faxlnus uhdel SW25 Me) 56%}air motlerets 8 Trap appears to ba tlecgmn9 ro live twig tlensity tlue ro GR Diameter ectimatetl. prolongetl eay Area tlreught 39 x 23.0 23.o Si Parlous uhdW Sev9) GSe) ST%fair 9ootl N corM6ions.Current wndition is approximately 95°A or"pooY'. Tree appears ro be tleclining in live twig aenairy due ro us 25 OR op^olonged Bay Area drought 0 % 282 282 SM1amelash Fndd uhdW SW45 GOv95 52%fair moderate 8 c ditions.Cument—ditiw is approximately 35%or"pops'. 4t 183 10.3 SM1amelash Fndd us uhow Sam Give) 55%fah moderate NE Tree appears ro be declining in live twig density due to28%wry 8 g prolonged 8"Area drought 4E G.5 6.5 SM1amel a,h Fndd us uhow 20v8 3=6 Poor Poor wntlmd'.Current condition is approximately 35%or"pccs'. 44 290 24.0 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 55/3) 65v60 63%fair good N GR Diameter setimeted. 94 90.7 90.7 SM1amelash Fndd us uhm W35 MRS 55%feir good 8 OR Tree appears to be declining in See twig density due to prolonged Bay Area tlrougM1t 18.0 18.0 SM1amelash Fsxlnus uhM Sew, 50150 50%fair poor to notl N wntlSions.Current condition is 45 approximately 90%or"poor". 96 905 90.5 Shamel aph Fax—uhtlel 5535 6595 55%tair good S OR T.9 Diameter estimat- 47 26.0 26.0 Shamel ash Fndd us uhm S53) TOM 67%feir good N Tree appeara to be declining in live is density due ro 31.6 R op^olongetl Bay An Anea tlrougM1t hinos.B, 98 916 Shamel ash Fravinus uhm S6130 60165 ST%fah mod to good S G c Ccondition is approsinudely 35%or"pool'. 49 M.5 24.5 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhflal 5525 5W55 55%fair mw.uste N Tree appears to be declining in live twig density due to rloue OR wprolonged Bay Area tlrougM1t gg 985 %5 Shamel ash Fran/rwsuhdel ssm SW55 56%tair moderete E tlhiona.Current condition is approsinudely 35%or 4 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA S _ C oc c + E o E c f z a x' Scisntif Name L $ o f 2 'c m e C H WLCA Nptac from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon rc r c y n - + Common Name o n c - n >, w w g �_ Ratings&NOTES 2017 E N rn c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genoa,aPeuea) a: m mo w c - c a ^ m u Spring-5 Survey qun� iF x x x i x x mia ��`m r?c4 a Sgg�e Wpp Fa°w g Yc - nY U� ow ccm o W8 ._ ONWARD dEEo = E' 2 2 2 2 ¢cg o°wLL a8 �'cS OO�Ex' 51 TREE REMOVED. TREE REMOVED. S9 16.8 16.8 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhM 45/25 6S/60 63%fair gootl E E 60%Falr.Same contlltlonas prevlouslY notetl In Past Years. Tree appears to be—lining from pr+l+ngetl eay Area Sa 31.6 31.6 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhM SW40 60/SO 55%fair motlerete W OR tlmughtcontlitions.Current entliti+n is approximately 35/. r"poor". 55 21.8 21.8 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhM SW25 6S/60 60%fair gootl Tree tleclining motleratey. 56 18.3 18.3 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhM SW20 55/55 SS%fair motlerete W Overall cantlition is now roughly 50%(Fair). Gravel In this area Trarrl PG&E gas pl"Ilne rePlacement M 57 18.5 18.5 Shamel aeh Fraxlnus uhtlN 55/30 OWN 63%fair gootl E December,20201ntlicates that root loss to some tlegree curretl tluring plperela[atl exwva0on. Gravel In thls area hem PG&E gas pipe Ilne replacement M 58 26.4 26.4 Shamel aeh Fraxlnus uhM 5S/30 VMS 58%fair motlerete W December,20201ntlicates that root loss to some tlegree curretl tluring PlpeKela[atl exwvatlon. Gravel In thls area from PG&E gas pipe Ilne replacement M Sg 33.8 33.8 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhM SW30 60/50 55%fair gootl E 11 December,20201ntlicates that root loss to some tlegree curretl tluring PIPe—latetl exca fl— 60 24.8 24.8 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlN —1 63/55 60%Pair gootl W 61 24.4 24.4 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhM SW35 OWN 60%fair motlerete E 62 27.8 27.8 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhM SW25 SUM 50%fair poor to motl W 63 31.5 31.5 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 53/00 70/65 68%fair gootl 5 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Name L $ o i 2 m+- y++ v 'c w c P.H WLCA Notae from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon a& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - a dSi Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 x Ey a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genoa,Pm-, a: m rao w c - 'm c a ^ r u Spnnq-5 Survey mia v�`m ?c �a Sggme qpa .Faw g YppFc W ns U� EvL cs�o ft ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i +'2 & H121 + n8 ¢''c.A uO�E+ 64 20.8 20.8 Shamelash Faxlnus uhtlel 40/25 SUM W%fair poortomotl W 65 20.7 20.7 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel SW25 65/53 55%fair Bootl E OR 66 37.8 37.8 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 60/25 70/63 68%fair Bootl W 67 18.3 18.3 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel SW25 65/65 65%fair motlemt. W p—ibN bark 68 X 41.0 41.0 Shamel a,h Fraxlnus uhtlel 55/50 60/SS 58%fair mw to Bootl NW inclusion 68 to tmnsPNnt 18.4 19A holly oak Querc-H- /5120 60/60 60%fair motlerate W 70%overall contli8on"Bootl". 70 to tmnsPNnt 13.2 13.2 holly oak Querc-H- 25/20 60/60 60%fair mw.nft W 65%overall c+ntliti+n 71 40.8 40.8 Shamelash Faxlnus uhtlel 60/45 65/55 60%fair Bootl 10 72 24.3 24.3 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel SW25 55/50 W%fair mW.mte E rwus OR 73 26.2 26.2 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel SW35 SUM 50%fair poor W 16 74 28.0 28.0 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel SW30 60/60 60%fair motlemw E 75 21.4 21.4 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 40/25 SUM 50%fair mW.mw W 76 20.2 20.2 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel MIS 40/50 47%poor poorto motl E 6 of 96 VaIIw Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA uptlatea oeera6 condition ¢ E g a c N F Z ^ n Scientific Name u $ o n 3 n Sp��g zoi survey Ratings&NOTES 2017 mon Name Com c c — c E E o g ONWARD (cenas.species 1 g s g a ra e W w w a w "gip ^>3 � F ¢rca°wit a3 77 t5.8 15.8 Shamelash Faxlnus uhdel 45MS 40/a) 35%poor poor W 78 17.0 17.0 StumelaM Far/nus uhdel 55/35 65/9) 50%fair motlerate nous GR ply Shamelash Faxlnus uhdW SW25 SW55 55%f to air poormotl W OR 79 21.2 282 282 Shamelash Faxlnus uhow 55/35 Vole) 55%feir motlerete E 81 247 24.7 Shamelash Faxlnus uhow Mir 56/e) 53%fair mwerete W 82 18.0 10.0 Shamelash Fraxlnus hdel 5512) 45/6) 48%poor poortomotl E 83 178 17.8 Shamelash Faxlnus uhm 56/a) 60/5S 57%feir motlerate W B4 212 21.2 Shamelash Faxlnus uhM SSW Mir 55%feir moderate E moe.rele to Sir20.5 20.5 Shamelash Faxlnus uhlel 56/a) fi516) fie°o fair good W SS 25.2 25.2 Shamelash Faxlnus uhm S5/35 65/5) %%fair Sow OR 87 22.8 22.8 Shamelash F7axlnus uh" 55155 65155 60%fah motl to gootl RW ID of species not 88 X 5.8 5.0 9.8 15.8 Monterey Pine Pinus 7erllafa 9111 65/85 65%feir motlerate vnrihed Removetl as o(Jan,2020. pa.g angry Islantl pure Pinus cananomsls 4S11 5 gaotl Be X 7 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E° E c f z a x' Scientif Name L $ o f 2 8+- y°+ v 'c w e C H WLCA Notac from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon rc r c y n - + Common Nam° o n c - n >, n m g �_ Ratings 8 NOTES 2011 E N r n c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genoa,aPm-) a' m e,o w c - c a ^ u Spring 2015 Survey mia v�`m ?c4 �a Sggme qa .Few g Ypc _ ns U� OL cs�o ONWARD 2 2 no3 go as ide �2.� nQ 20 02 & of 5$ '+ ¢cq o°wn a8 ¢''c.A uO�Ex Fr not 16.0 fi.0 Monterey pine Plnus ratllata 18/25 90/30 30%poor m Infec[etl by pine R..-as o(Jan,2020. pXch canker fungus. Tree has bark beetle 91 X X 20.4 20.4 Monterey pine Plnus ratllata 25125 40/40 40%poor poor to motl W Issuesandlorpine Removetl as of Jan,2020. pitch canker Infection. Cue eniopsis 82 X X 15.5 15.5 cart raXotr,or anac Mloldes,or 20/15 25/10 15P-7 poor W motl W Removetl as of Jan,2020. °d Centonia siliqua araotwootl,or Cueaniopsis 89 X 11.6 11.6 c anac dloldes,or 20115 50130 45%poor matlerat0 4toT Removetl as of Jan,2020. Ceramnia siliqua araotwootl,or Cueaniopsis 84 X 1- 1- c t anac dloldes,or 20120 45/35 40%poor poor W motl 6 to 12 Removetl as of Jan,2020. Ceramnia siliqua Active crock 1° 4ar�olwootl,or Cueaniopsis canes,-d 85 X X 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 35.0 � anac dloldes,or 20120 6.10 30%poor gootl 1 "azlreme Nsk"of Removetl as aJan,2020. Ceramma siliqua Yallu ASAP.eve ASAP. 86 X 34.0 34.0 Shamel ash Fiaxlnus uhtlel 40I25 65/55 57%fair gootl X Removetl as aJan,202 87 to tmnapbnt X 15.3 15.3 holly oak Quercus ilex 20125 7WS 75%gootl gootl 80%overall condition"gootl" 88 to tranapbnt X 14.0 14.0 holly oak Quercus ilex 2S/25 7W5 75%9ootl gootl 70%overall condition"gootl" 88 to tranapbnt X 11.6 11.6 holly oak Quercus ilex 22120 7-0 70%gootl motlmat0 73%overall condition"gootl" 12.3 12.3 Monterey pine Plnus ratllata 18/15 50150 50%fair matlerate SE 13 ID of species n Removetl as aJan,2020. ed8etl. Monterey pine Plnus ratllata 28/20 50150 50%fair motlerate Removetl as o1 Jan,2020. 102 25.8 Me SIN amel ash Fr4Xlnus uhtlel S0/35 S0/35 40°/poor motlOrab X 12 8 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA IT S + E+ E c f z a x' Sckntif Name L $ o f 2 m+- y++ v 'c w e C H WLCA Nobs from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Es& $'-rc r$ y n - o Common Name o n c -m n n m g - a Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genoa,aPm- a: m rao w c - 'm c a ^ >, u Spring-5 Survey miaSggme qa .Faw g YppFc W ns U� Evdi L cs�o ft ._ ONWARD dE �'E$_- .e 2 2 2 2 2 2 n d,aE=go as ide �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + aHmm n8 a''c iA uO�E+ Esti-d overall-did.of 20%very poor as of 7 I2812020 tlne to extensive tleeay on knsion sitle(nortM1 sitle)of mot 0,1 po dh t-N.g o lean to the southeast over N. 109 X 24.7 24.7 SM1amel asM1 Fraxlnus uhtlel 53/35 50/40 4S%poor motlemk E X 8 Wolfe R WLCAinstalletltwo nails a ndntl smioin g ena &7/2&220.Th e basine r5goa wa 74.4 tl .(1.6 tlemoff v--Q. WLCA suggests removal of tree a[this Nme. 104 16.5 16.5 SM1amel a,M1 Fraxlnus uhtlel 55/30 55/w 50%fair mctlemte E E X Neatls e,dw lght rstluctlon pruning 105 16.0 16.0 SM1amel a,h Fraxlnus uhde/ 45/25 45/45 4S%poor motlemk E X 4 1N X 21.7 21.7 SM1amel a,h Fraxlnus uhde1 50/35 60/SO 55%fair 9-d X X 107 X 19.4 19.4 SM1amel a,h Fraxlnus uhde/ MIS 60/45 Mfair mctlemte S X 109 15.9 15.9 Shame/ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 9 55%fair 7 rI motl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 109 X 14.4 14.4 Shame/ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 35125 40140 40%poor poor to motl N Removetl as of Jan,2020. 110 X Me Me Shame/ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 45130 -30 35%poor poor 11 Removetl as of Jan,2020. 111 X X 29.7 29.7 Monterey pine Plnus ratllata 45135 60155 57%fair matlerate Measured at 2 ket. Removetl as of Jan,2020. 112 X X 19.1 19.1 Monterey pine P/nus ratllata 25116 010 0%Deatl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 25%very Bark beetle issues 119 X X 28.0 15.0 43.0 Monterey pine Plnus ratllata 30I20 2S/25 Poor poor w and-pine pi.h Removetl as of Jan,2020. canker fungus. 9 of 96 Upd..d O� .11 C-dki- RMI,g,&NOTES 2017 IN 111111m mmumm ONWARD ON& F 1r, "]SEEM limb IF, lie 1 4,111111ME momollsommossom mommilsommossom 11L J11111WE MEME111111001M ....... ..... ..... sp= lssfo- RMI,g,&NOTES 2017 ONMRD IN on R--.—J-2020. Ir vim .. .... .... -,—d,,ao,ON,2111p,r op 6.-- 1 lie WWI PN how Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA _ C oc c + E+ E c f z a x' ScientiW Nam, L $ o f 2 8+- J,+ v 'c w e C H WLCA Nobs from Uptlatetl Overall 0-difion rc r c y n - + Common Name o n c - n >, n m g �_ Ratings 8 NOTES 201] x E N r n c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genoa,aPmss a: m mo w c - c a ^ u Spring 2p15 Survey +uE iF x x x i x x mia v�`m ?c4 �a Sggme qa .Few g Ypc _ ns U� OL cs�o ft ._ ONWARD dEEo = E' 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'E 6o3 go as ide �2.� nQ 2$ A. & uf5$ '+ ¢cq o°wn o.8 ¢''c.A uO�Ex .0 Ficus species Ficus sp. 2 ]0/50 55%fair m e oved as of OCVN,v 2018 per parking level. plan. 141 .9 3.] 9.6 Ficus species Ficus sp. 12 ]0/50 55%fair matlerate Located at Pi oved as of OcUN+v 2018 per parking level. plan. 1. .0 4.3 9.3 Ficus species Ficus sp. 20/12 ]0/50 55%fair matlerate Located at Pi oved as of OCVNov 2018 per parking level. plan. 143 5.0 4.1 9.1 Ficus species Ficus sp. 20112 ]0/50 55%fair matlerate X Located at P1 oved as of OcVNov 2018 per parking W.I. plan. 144 X 5.0 4.6 4.4 14.0 Ficusspecies Ficus sp. 2-12 ]0/50 55%fair matlerate X L-Wdat Pi -d as of OCVN+v 2018 per parking W.I. plan. 145 X X 24.7 24.7 Monterey pine Pluus radiate 35125 IS— 60%fair matlerate Removetl as of Jan,2020. 146 X 0.1 0.1 vergreen pear Pyres kawakamll 20115 6.150 57%fair matlerate Removetl as of Jan,2020. 147 X 7.2 7.2 vergreen pear Pyres kawakamll 15112 40/40 40%poor poor W Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1M X 42.2 42.2 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 60125 00/80 00%gootl gootl X Removetl as of Jan,2020. 149 X 28.0 28.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervimns 55115 35/45 40%poor poor X X Removetl as of Jan,2020. Neetla root crown gowerUng cherry 150 X AO 3.1 7.1 ar Prunua serrvlata Cult 1218 30130 30%poor ?Out of leaf BRC Canditia,n not Removetl as of Jan,2020. ed6etl n, [of leaf tluring surveyl. 151 X 2].] 2].] oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervimns 611- 00/60 fib%fair gootl 9to3 X X Removetl as of Jan,2020. 152 X 31.2 31.2 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervimns 55115 6.160 60%fair matlerete X Removetl as of ,2020. 12 of 96 RMI,g,&NOTES 2017 ONWARD IN Immmulm --- 1 11--- on F pm� bmw 1pr-- homw limillmillimmmoommill ]SEEM limillmillimmmommolml masomm R, '-.d,�dJ-2020. Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA oc + E+ E c f z a x' S.W.M.Name L $ o f 2 8+- y++ v 'c w e C H WLCA Nptac from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon rc r c y n — + Common Name o n c - n >, n m g �_ Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 x E N r n c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genoa,aPm- a: m mow SPring 2p15 Survey Sggme qpa .Fawcs6o ON 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'2 63 go as ide �d �2.� nQ 20 02 & of 5$ '+ ¢cq a°wn a8 ¢m'c.A uO�Ex pr .8 Shamel ash Faxlnus uhtlel Ms 25/25 P+or X movetl as of January 2020 21.6 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 40I25 30/30 30%poor poor emovetl as of January 2020 7 12.1 12.1 Shamel ash Fmxlnus uhtlel 35120 50/40 45%poor poor to motl GR X mxvetlasof January2020 10 X X 20.1 20.1 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 40I25 25/25 25%very very poor X emovetl as of January 2020 Poor 170 X 25.8 25.0 Shamel ash Fiaxlnus uhtlel 55130 55/40 45%poor poor vere GR X emovetl as of January 2020 171 X 40.2 40.2 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervirens 60/25 BOI80 00%800tl matlerab X X 11911875%overa11contliti— Reovetl as of 112020. 172 X 21.2 21.2 Shamel ash Fuxin..uhtlel -30 55/45 4e%poor poor 0 movetl as of January 2020 173 X X 27.2 27.2 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervirens 65110 45/45 45%poor poor X movetl as of January 2020 174 X 28.5 20.5 Shamel ash Fiaxlnus uhtlel 55140 30/30 30%poor poor 0to7 X movetl as of January 2020 175 X 26.5 26.5 Shamel ash Fiaxlnus uhtlel 55140 50/60 55%fair matlerate X movetl as of January 2020 176 X X 22.5 22.5 Shamel ash F]axlnus uhtlel 55140 25/30 27%vary very Poor X movetl as of January 2020 Poor 1T] X X 37.5 37.5 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervirens 65125 55/60 58%fair poor to motl X X movetl as of January 2020 178 X S.T 3.8 8.5 trawberrytree Arbutus unedo 1— ]0/50 60%fair .—rate W W X movetl as of January 2020 14 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA oc Zc + E+ E c f z a x' Scientif Name y++ v 'c w e C H WLCA Np from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon rc r c y n - o Common Name o n c - n >, n m ca �_ Ratings S NOTES 201] x E N r n c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genoa,aPm- a: m mow c - c a ^ u SPdng 2pt5 Survey miaSggme qa .Faw g Ypc _ ns U� OL cs�o ONWARD dEdF,o�o3 go as io?e uO�Ex .t strawberry tree Arbutus unedo 20/ g g movetl as of January 2020 21.2 21.2 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 55I25 MIS 15%very very Poor 11 X movetlasof January2020 poor 181 X tt.6 11.6 oast re—d Sequoia sempervlrens SSl6 10/10 10%vary very Poor X X movetl as of January 2020 poor 182 X X 21.2 21.2 oast r ..d Sequoia sempervlrens 65112 sts 5%very pea very poor X .movetl as of January 2.20 183 X X 13.8 13.8 Shamelash Fiaxlnus uhtlel -16 20n0 20%very very Poor GR X .movetl a.of January 2.20 P.., I" x x 11.9 11.9 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel -12 sts 5%verypoor verypoor X movetlasof January2020 185 x x 13.3 13.3 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel S.I. 20/20 20%vary very Poor X movetlasof January2020 P.., 186 x x 9.7 e.7 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 3.112 8I8 0%verypca verypoor X movetlasof January2020 187 x 34.7 34.7 oastr ..d Sequoia sempervlrens 55125 MISS 6.%fair matlerate X .movetl as of January 2020 N N X tlollrear gum Eucalyptus 20%very veryp oor movetl as of January 2.20 188 x x tz.z 1z.z song zglzg tlling p+lyanMemos(sredlingJ poor 189 x x 18.1 is.1 oastr ..d Sequoia sempervlrens 6.2. 40/00 4 Poor Poor X movetl as of January 2.20 1SO x x 26.9 26.9 oastr ..d Sequoia sempervlrens 70125 4040 4 Poor Poor X movetl as of January 2020 191 x 17.5 175 dollar gum p+lyanfhem+aEucalyptus 6.135 MISS 58%fair matlerate S movetl as of January 2020 seedling (sredlingJ 15 of 96 IN on pm� hEm 1pr-- homw low -DSCAPE �NDSC�E Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z a x' S.w.t NameWLCA Nobs from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon rc r c y n — + Common Name o n c Ratings 6 NOTES 2017 x E N r n c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genoa,aPeuea) a: m mow c — c a ^ u SPdng 2p15 Survey +u � iF x x x i x x mia QiI 4 �a Sggme qa .Faw g YpcOL cs�o ft ._ ONWARD dEEo = E' 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'E 6o3 go as ide �2.� nQ 20 02 & uf5$ '+ ¢cq a°wn a8 ¢m'c.A uO�Ex P oast retlwootl uola sempervlrens BW30 ]Y/5 75%9ootl g I lope stability Removetl as of January 2020 Possible steep .1 24.1 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 75120 75/65 70%gootl gootl hillslape stability Removetl as o(January 2020 Possible steep hillslOpe stability Needs aebarist cabling 29.9 29.9 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 00125 ]5140 50%fair gootl FS between Removetl as of January 2020 e of two inate s,i(retain Possible steep M1illslope stability Nds ar ee barist cabling 32.2 32.2 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens BOI25 ]5140 50%fair gootl 30 between Removetl as of January 2020 o wo Inat s,iff retain tree 209 TREE REMOVED FROM ANDSCAPE Possible stability 49.0 49.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 05125 ]5160 65%fair matlerete 65 Issue+n the hill. Removetl as of January 2020 Roots may have bean s.—d 211 X 14.9 14.9 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 50115 65165 65%fair matlereb X X Removetl as of January 2020 212 X 22.0 22.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 65115 75175 75%gootl matlereb X X Removetl as of January 2020 tulle tree Tree.pcears tleatl, (ID no[vennetl- 9%tleatl but may simply be 213 X X 16.0 16.0 tree out of leaf Llrlodendren tulipihra 35130 010 (Confirm in w above ground Removetl as of January 2020 tluring survey) spring( d..nt until spring I.- - X X 31.3 31.3 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 75125 75165 70%gootl motlereb X Removetl as of January 2020 215 X 20.3 20.3 tern pine Podocarpus greclllor 50120 00160 70%gootl gootl W Removetl as of January 2020 216 X 15A 15.4 tern pine Podocarpus greclllor 50120 75165 70%gootl 9ootl W Removetl as of January 2020 217 X 13.6 13.6 tam pine Podocarpus greclllor 50120 75165 70%gootl 9ootl W Removetl as of January 2020 17 of 96 Vallw Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Name L $ o i 2 from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon Name o n c - n Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 x E (Genoa,aPeueal a: m ra o w c - c a ^ _ m u- Spring—5 Survey YcOL cum+V`_o F' ._ ONWARD a �L 'Y E` E_ - 2 2 11 2 2 nZ'Eo-$`o ¢c4 o°wn a8 ¢mGu4 UOC.Ex ide OK IMMM tle 1w � ncedfy condition A odendren IUIIpMtra M. m tree hac a tree has leafetl Removetl as o1 January 2020 tree out of leaf le-d cut in out(or not)In tluring survey) spring) Pring. Tree is in tlecline wiM an apparent overall—diti+n of Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 50125 —1 43%poor poor[o motl W roughly 30%(Poor).REMOVED WITH PERMIT PER PLAN, RhDEVCON.JULY 2021. 220 X 26.8 26.8 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 55/35 60f55 59°/fair matlerab Tree is in tlecline with an 221 19.3 19.3 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel MIS SUN eM fair motlereb apparent overall condition o1 roughly 35%(Poor). Tree is in tlecline with an 2. X 19.5 19.5 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 55/35 60f55 58%fa1r motlereb E apparent overall condition M roughly 30%(Poor). 223 X 30.4 30.4 SIN amelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 55/40 70f45 —fair gootl E E GR 12 X i i Removetl per plan on Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 15 40150 40%poor poor W motl W 1 012 212 018 by Clint magill, DEVCON. 225 X 25.4 25.4 SIN amel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 55/35 50f40 48%Poor motleret0 E Rooh severed on west side. 226 X 15.5 15.5 SIN amel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 45/25 50f30 37%poor motlerete E E 0 to 1 Rooh severed on west sWa. 227 X X 18.5 18.5 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 45/25 30120 26%wry Poor E 0 to 5 14 Rook severed on Poor —M.. 228 X 11.5 11.5 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 3=5 40f30 35%poor motleret0 E Rootssevered on west side. MV oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 25112 80190 80%excellent gootl Removetl as A2.2 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 30114 80190 80%excellent gootl Removetl as 18 of 96 Vallw Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA oc + E+ E c f z a x' S.W.M.Name L $ o f 2 8+- y++ v 'c w e C H WLCA Notac from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon rc r c y n - + Common Name o n c - n r n m g �_ Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 x E N r n c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genoa,aPm- a: m mow SPring 2p15 Survey Sggme qpa .Fawcs6o ON 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'2 63 go as ide �d �2.� nQ 20 02 & of 5$ '+ ¢cq o°wn a8 ¢m'c aS uO�Ex A Shamel ash Faxlnua uhdel 43F10 35/45 39%poor poor Removetl as o(Jan,2020. 19.3 Shamel ash Fiaxlnua uhdel SSI30 40/45 42%poor poor to motl E Removetl as o1 Jan,2020. t9.6 19.6 Shamel ash Fiaxlnua uhdel 55130 50140 47%poor m..- E 0101 Removetl as o1 Jan,2020. 234 x 15.1 15.1 Shamel ash Fmxlnus uhdel SOI25 35/35 35%poor poor E Removetl as o1 Jan,2020. 235 x 17.8 17.0 Shamel ash Fiaxlnua uhdel 55125 55140 50%fair matlerate Removetl as o1 Jan,2020. 236 x 17A 17.4 Shamel ash Fiaxlnua uhdel 55125 55155 55%fair matlerate Removetl as o1 Jan,2020. 237 x 6.5 6.5 Shamel ash Fmxlnus uhdel 30115 75165 70%9ootl motl to gootl Removetl as o1 Jan,2020. 238 x 9.2 9.2 Shamel ash Fmxlnus uhdel 35110 75160 72%9ootl motl to gootl Removetl as o1 Jan,2020. 239 x 6.8 6.8 Shamel ash Fiaxlnua uhdel 30110 70145 54%fair motl to gootl rious OR Removetl as of Jan,2020. 240 x 8.1 0.1 Shamel ash Fmxlnus uhdel 30110 70160 70%9ootl motl to gootl Removetl as o1 Jan,2020. 241 X 6.4 6.4 oast mtlwootl Sequoia sempervirens 30110 BSI85 05%gootl gootl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 242 X 5.4 5.4 oast mtlwootl Sequoia sempervirens 30110 BSI85 05%gootl gootl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 243 X S.T S.T oast mtlwootl Sequoia sempervirens 30110 BSI85 05%gootl gootl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 19 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA oc + E+ E c S.W.M.Name L $ o f 2 8+- y++ v 'c w e C H WLCA Notac from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon r c y n - + Common Name o n c - n r n m g �_ Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 x E N r n c c c jj (Genoa,aPm- mow c - c a u SPringp5Surveygga c L c6o f ._ ONWARD 22 n dZ'2 63 go as ide �2.� nQ 20 02 & of 5$ '+ ¢cR o°wn a8 ¢m'c.A uO�E pr oast retlwootl uola sempervirens M. M5 TS%gootl g Removetl as of Jan,2020. T flowering pear(out Pyrua calleryana CUIL 30114 05/65 ]5%gootl gootl N Removetl as aJan,2020. o leaf flowering pear(out Two..d—inant B 5.0 Mleaf) Pyrus calleryana Cult 2.13 05160 fib%fair gootl see notes on s.Remove Removetl as of Jan,2020. e of wo. 247 X g a g flowerng p,r(out Pyrus calleryana Cult 2.10 05150 55%fair mOtlerate N Root cr ly n Removetl as of Jan,2020. 20 X 7.8 ]g flowering pear(out pyrus calleryana Cult 30110 05155 62%fair gootl N Various Removetl as aJan,2020. of leaf) elevatlons us X 6.5 6.5 flowering pear(out pyrus calleryana Cult 30112 05165 75%gootl gootl N Removetl as aJan,2020. of leaf) 250 X 6.3 6.3 flowering pear(out pyrus calleryana Cult 30112 05155 60%fair gootl N 12 Removetl as aJan,2020. of lea 251 X 6.1 6.1 floweringea pr(out Pyrua calleryana Cult 05160 20110 fib%f ov air gootl Remetl as aJan,2020. of lea 252 X 3.6 3.6 floweringpear(out Pyruacalleryana CUIL 1&8 BSI]5 00%gootl gootl Removetl as o(Jan,2020. of lea 20 X 7.3 7.3 flowering pear(out Pyrus calleryana Cult 30115 05165 ]3%gootl gootl Removetl as aJan,2020. of lea 254 X 7.3 ]5 flowering pear(out pyrus calleryana Cult 30110 05155 63%fair gootl ] Removetl as aJan,2020. of leaf) 255 X 9,0 90 floweringpear(out pyrus calleryana Cult 30120 051a5 55%fair gootl X ] Removetl as o(Jan,2020. of lea 256 X 7.3 TS floweringpear(out pyrus calleryana Cult 30115 05150 58%fair gootl X ] Removetl as of Jan,2020. of leaf) 20 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c E z e x' Sciantif Name L $ o +- y++ v '1 w c F!H WLCA Nobs from UPtlatetl OverallJ2 '7 rc r c y n - + Common Name tin c n m g �_ Ratings 8 NOT x E N r n c c c c c c _m„ x w.c (Genoa,aPealea) a' m mow c - c a ^ u SPdng 2p15 Survey a+u � iF x x x i x x mia v-`I -a Sggme ;. .Faro g Ypc _o 2-2 1. s U� OL ONWAR E dE Eo - E' 2 2 2 2 E E n P. 'E go as ide �d 2$ 02 ¢c4a8 i .A uO�Ex 9 pear(out yrus aalleryana Cult MIS MSS fiS%fair gootl 10 Removetl as of lea] flowering pear(ou[ pyua aalleryana Cull. 30115 05160 fi]%fair gootl X XRemovetl as o(lea<9 flowering pear(out pyrus aalleryanaCult25112 85165 68%fair gootl X Removetl as of leaf) EW tllacretlonary X 95.8 35.9 X CaIHamW Plafanus mcemosa 6S/95 63/SO 60%Pair motlerete W W TREEBEINGMOVEDDURING transplant sycamore THE WEEK OF JULY 12,2021 Bark sloughing of 261 tllacretlonary X 22.8 21.9 99.T X CaIHamW Plafanus maemosa 65/95 ]5/95 5T%fair motlerate N&S OR Sea note At.,o R. root crown,p—lbly TREE BEING MOVED DURING transplant sycamore at dght due to lMgadon THE WEEK OF JULY 12,2021 water spray. 2. di-Ionary X 15.9 15.9 X CaIHamW Plafanus mcemosa 45/30 TWO ]0%gootl motlOnte NE NE 1 it TREE BEING MOVED DURING transpant sycamore THE WEEK OF JULY 12,2021 ]roe condition m r+aghly the 263 X i3.S 13.5 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 3SMS SW45 47%poor mw.nft S S OR ame as previously notetl in past years. 14.9 Shamel ash Fiaxlnus uhtlel S5120 55155 55%fair poor to motl S S Removetl as of Jan,2020 11 19.0 Shamel ash Fiaxlnus uhtlel S0120 55190 95%poor motl.— Removetl as of Jan,2020. 266 X 20.8 Shamel ash Fiaxlnus uhtlel S5130 50130 35%poor poor to motl Rcoh h..b— Removetl as of Jan,2020. 267 X 23.7 23.7 Shamel ash Fiaxlnus uhtlel SU13S fi5130 30%poor good SW SW OR Roofs hav tlbeen Removetl as of Jan,2020. 268 X 26.5 26.5 Shamel ash Fiaxlnus uhtlel S512S 75155 65%fair good S X Removetl as of Jan,2020. 268 X 27.1 27.1 Shamel ash Fiaxlnus uhtlel S512S 75195 55%fair gootl twos GR 25 X Removetl as of Jan,2020. 21 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA Ea o'8'Y 8 °rY �e E a _ ;- r=• o. ^' common Name --tar,Name a 'a 8 _ s 8 3_ @` o s _ o gg O? 1° x °»Csa a 2 (Genus,sPeciea) 2 j ac`d W na u; m e 5 Updated Overall Condition @@ WLCA from i F x x x x u a ° ,p n _3 c d o a c �q O'rc m '- m g Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 '� na `oc •�4 °e .FSw gg g o K`pt! gE cE�o— ._E Pnng 20153urvey a°rc�a—LL a8 2 2 2 2 2 2 $'c4 uSovE go W! S¢¢ Epa gr8 e.@ "@ 8�W aY ��8 dlu E$ $ a, ONWARD 2T0 X 28.T ce 28.7 Shamel ash 17nminus uhdel 6a35 T5/55 63Yo Lair goetl Root system Tree cantlitian appears to be 10 declining.Current conditionasymmetrical rating is roughly 90%(Pow,. 271 X 35.2 35.2 coast redwood Sequel..—PeMrons 60120 TaTO TO%gootl motlereb x 2TL X 18.3 19.3 ceast mdwae S equola sempaMrons Taiz 63170 69%rah moderet. x 273 X 23.3 23.3 coast redwood S equola sempeMrons 60112 70170 TO%gootl motlarete x 2. X 23.9 23.9 coast redwood S equola sempeMrons 60112 70170 TO%gootl motlerete X 275 17.0 17.0 Shamel aah Freel...uhow Sa16 65M65 65%Pair motlerete X 276 x 15.4 15.4 Sit amel ash Fraxlnus uhdel 60112 40130 39%poor poor E at root crewn X Tres condition same as noted In Prior Years. zT] 19.3 10.3 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhdel BARS 50190 /O%poor motlerab E E rleus GR X Tree.—did—appears to to, tlecli r... y 30%condition n is roughly 30%(Poor(. 278 X 21.0 21.0 Sha..1.0 F—...uhael 80/RS 6a50 55%lair moderete W W Tree pwalian appears tow OR declining.Current condition is roughly 48%(Poor(. 2" x 26.7 26.7 ceest retlwood Sequoia sempeMrons 80120 Tree condldon aP"..to toe 8a80 80%gootl good declining.Current condition is roughly]0%(Le.the b end of '.Good"condition nding range,. 280 16.4 16.9 shame ash Fraxl]ws uhatel 4020 .10195 37%poor poor rleue OR X Tree declining. Ccondition.Pceara io bo declining.Cu 30%(P.,). is raugM1ly 30%(Poor,. 281 x 21.2 21.2 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhM 5a35 yang 20%vary Peer YBry P°Of 6 X Roots se md. C..dition same as noted In pHw years. 282 15.0 15.0 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhdW 35118 30,30 30%pow pvcr E OR X Root sweretl. Tree in same condition as previously n°tetl in past years. 22 of 96 Vallw Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA Ea o'p'Y 8 °rY �a E a _ ;- I°`-_• o. ^' common Name ScientRc Name ey UPtlatetl Oel Condition na WLCA Noaeu Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 2 2 2 2 2 a''cS d�PO�P�co WP S¢¢ rppm e�P$ n@ "@ 8�w nY �0^8 dlu EcPb$� �� 8o ONWARD iae �d �Zo° 289 X tS.t 18.1 ahamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 50120 Tree In tlecllne.Current 40130 35%poor poortomod E GR X Raole eeverad. ewdifon is roughly 26%(Very Poor).Suggest consider removal of tree. 284 14A 14.4 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 40zs 40/40 40%poor pow OR X rraemeame a°nahfanx pmvlously ndad In peat years. 285 X 1SA iSA Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 50125 50/40 N%poor poorto motl E E OR X Rode eeveretl. 17.0 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhde/ 40/Cs 60160 60%fair mW.rat. N DEVCON REMOVED TREE WITH PERMIT,PER PLAN, JULY,2021. 287 X 24.3 oast retlwootl SquoId 60115 ]0I]0 70%90 maeM DEVCON REMOVED TREE X WITH PERMIT,PER PLAN, JULY,2021. 288 X 15.7 oast retlwootl S Id sem rvlrens 60115 DEVCON REMOVED TREE e9°O Pe ]01]0 ]0%gootl matlerate X WITH PERMIT,PER PLAN, JULY,2021. 288 X X oast retlwootl Sequola sempervim" 60115 50165 63%fair motlerete Apical mad-. DEVCON REMOVED TREE X howing physical WITH PERMIT,PER PLAN, stura tleflclt. symst of am' WITH 2021. mdre 2 Shamel aan Fraxlnus uhtlel 40120 45135 a0%poor poor to motl W rio DEVCON REMOVED TREE us OR X WITH PERMIT,PER PLAN, JULY,2021. 281 X 242 24.2 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel SW40 55/45 48%poor motlerata, W rmus OR 6 Tree In decline.Current contlXlon Is 38%(POOr). 282 X 16.3 16.3 coast retlwootl SBQnule sampeMrons 35/10 TWO 70%goo i grad—ta Trea is in dine tlue 1.chronic draughty condition..Currant condition rating is 60%(Fair). 283 TREE REMOVEDFROM LANDSCAPE. 284 (em pine Podocarpus greclllar 30110 S11I40 45%poor matlerate 5 X Removetl as dJan,2 285 X B.fi ..fi au[hern magndia Magnolia Drendlflore 1fln5 25125 25%very Poor p°Of W 8 X X Removetl as or'an,2020 23 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA v= E8- S �SoEH c c + II E c f z e x' ScieniXk Name L $ o i 2 8+- y++ v 'c w c p.H WLCA Notac from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Es& rc r c y n - + Common Name o n c n m g _ Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 N r n c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genoa,aPeuea) a: m mow c - c a ^ u SPring 2p15 Survey +u � iF x x x i x x mia v�`m ?5 4 �a Sggme qa .Faw g Ypc _ ns U� OL cs�o ft ._ ONWARD dEEo = E' 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'E o3 go as ide �2.� nQ 2$ 02 & uf5$ '+ ¢cq a°wn a8 weaS u0- i T.3 Shamel ash Fax I.-uhdel 90/15 poor poor W Removetl as o1 Jan,2020 297 X X 12.1 12.1 Shamel ash Faxlnus uhdel 25N5 35/20 20%very P.., poor fi Removetl as o(Jan,2020 298 X X 10.a 10.8 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens fi0112 MIS 15%very very poor X Removetl as of Jan,2020 poor 299 X 16.0 16.0 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhdel a5I15 30/45 o%poor poor Removetl as aJan,2020 300 X X 23.3 23.3 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 60- 20/20 20%very very poor X Removetl as o(Jan,2020 P.., 301 X X 15.2 15.2 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhdel 2510 20/15 19%Wry very poor X Removetl as of Jan,2020 poor 302 X 26.9 15.0 a1.9 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 70I25 fi0I60 6.%fair matlerate X Removetlas of Jan,2020 303 X 17.2 17.2 Shamel asM1 Faxlnus uhdel 3— 5— 55%fair matlerate NW Removetl as aJan,2020 304 X X 19.0 19.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens a5110 515 5%very poor very poor X Removetl as of Jan,2020 305 X X 20.1 20.1 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhdel 20I15 10/10 1o%. X 6 Removetl as aJan,2020 3" X 17.5 17.5 Shamel ash Faxlnus uhdel a5125 501ao a0%poor poor to motl W 0 Removetl as aJan,2020 907 X X 17.7 17.7 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 40I20 30/25 29%Wry poor X 0to6 Removetl as of Jan,2020 poor 306 X 21.1 21.1 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens SONS 75175 75%9ootl Bootl Removetl as of Jan,2020 24 of 96 sp= lssfo- RMI,g,&NOTES 2017 ONMRD IN Immmul-1 — --- 1 11--- on R—.d.—J-2020 r WE I IPPR.--.d-aJ..,2.2. limillmillim 0 JIM11111111ME MMMMI§llllo R—.y-.- -P"*,* Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z a x' Scientif Name L $ o f 2 m+- y++ v 'c w e B H WLCA N+tac from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ev& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m o. n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genoa,aPeuea) e m mo w c - 'm c a ^ r u Spnnq-5 Survey miaSggme qpaYppFc W ns U� Evdi L cs�o fr ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n da'=go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + 0.8 ¢''c.A uO�E+ 3. X 11.8 11.8 Shamelash Faxlnus uh&I 4SMS 40/40 40%poor poor X 323 X 8.4 8.4 Shamelash Fraxlnus uh&I 4SM2 30/30 30%poor poor X 3. X 12.8 12.8 Shamelash Fraxlnus uh&I 40/12 30/40 35%poor poor X 325 X X 7.4 7.4 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uh&I 28112 20/20 20%wry very Poor X Poor 326 X 13.0 13.0 Shamelash Fraxlnus uh&I 45/20 45/SS 48%Poor poor X 927 X 11.8 11.8 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 4S/12 90/30 90%poor poor E OR X TREE BEEN REMOVED q I I I FROMOM LANDSCAPE. 3. X 14.2 14.2 Shamelash Faxlnus uhtlel 45/20 35/40 38%poor poor S X 330 X 15.7 15.7 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 40/20 30/40 35%poor poor S X 331 X 10.1 10.1 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 30/20 40MS 37%P r poor S S X 332 X X 18.8 18.8 aust retlwootl Sequoia sempeMrons -2 s/S 5%very poor very poor X 0%(Deatl). 333 X X 18.4 18.4 worst retlwootl Sequoia semPe .- SS/8 s/S 5%vary poor very poor X 0%(Deatl). 334 X 18.5 18.5 Shamelash Fraslnus uhtlN 45/25 4S/55 SMftir motlemb X 26 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA Ea o'p°Y 8 °rY �° E a _ ;- I°`-_• o. ^' common Name ScientRc Name a 'e 8 3_ @` o s _ o gg ? 1° x »Csa a 2 (Genus,sPeciea) 2j ac`u W oa u UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon WLC/Notea from i F x x x x u a ° ,° n _3 c d o a c �q t7 rc m '- m 3 Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 '� na `oc •�4 °e .FSw gg g o K`pt! gE cE�o— ._E Pnng 20153urvoy a°rc�o.—LL a8 2 2 2 2 2 2 $'cS o.SovE go W! S¢¢ Epm gr8 e.@ "@ 8�W aY ��8 dlu E$ $ a, ONWARD 935 X X t6.0 16.0 west retlwootl Sequoia semPorvirens W12 5/6 5%w ry Pwr wrypwr X 0%IDeatll. 336 X X 9.6 9.6 SM1amel aeM1 Fr d.-uhtlel 25/10 10/10 10%wry Pwr motlorata mineam X 337 X X 8.8 8.8 Shamel a6M1 FraXlnus uhtlN 257 5/5 5%wry poor wry pwr mainatam X 330 X 8.7 8.7 Shame1a0 Frulnus uhtlel 30/8 30/1U 15%wry Poor P°Or mainsfem X 330 X 12.8 12.8 Shamel acM1 FreXlnua uhtlel 40120 40/90 40%pwr Pwr W X 390 X 14.3 14.3 Shamel ash Fra8lnus uhtlel 50/20 95/90 98%pwr pwr X 991 X % 10.8 10.0 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 35/8 10/10 10%wry Poor Yery P°Of ainatem X 392 X X 12.0 12.0 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 85/18 10/1a 10%wry Pwr Yery P°Of ainatem X 999 X 117 13.7 Shamelash Frulnus uhtlel 45f18 95/35 95%pwr pwr Verify ewtlition X ee leafs wt m ePrinB. w X X 7.3 T•3 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 20112 20/20 20%wry Pwr very Pwr X 345 X 18.8 19.8 Shamel ash F1.0—uhtlel 9W20 40130 35%pwr pwr 8 X 3" X X 10.7 10.7 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 25/12 IWO 10%vary Poor wry pwr E X 397 X X 11.1 11.3 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 25112 25110 17%vary pwr Pow X 27 of 96 Tag x To M Remavetl Par Cumerd Sit Plan Author Recommends N Removal Due to Very x x x poor Condition or o. Elevatd Rlsk of � Failure ` �m Op Project Team Deaim in t TrensPlant Q� Dr m Trunk 2(in.) o O Tmnk 3(in.) A Tmnk4(in.) C Tmnk B(In.) �2 D Tmnk 8(in.) v 1 u w y i-r Trunk inw w ro Diamebr IncM1ea @ "Protected Tree"per City of Cupertino Ordinance (to.w,single stem,2o" mwu,vadoas specified native antl mnative sPecies) 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 b y b Height antl Canopy Sproad(fl.) 3 N d g � w � w eE' R x..IdiasWclural `w rb5 Ratings x T y y y vy $ o_m cpnmu_ Rating(0.M%) y m 3 y�y Z $ Z Live Twio Density S $ 3 y (Vary r,Poor,Mod, S 3 Gooq E Exc.) m F m F Lopsided Canopy (Dii—lon Nohd) �e Tmnk Lean (Dii—lon Nobd) Nisbrtcal Sbm Spetut Evidence (Nob Elevation) Tappotl or Sonny Pmnetl in Past Budd Root Crown (BRCj or Gi-mg Ropb(GR) stem Decay (Not Elevation) Codomin— Mainstms with °1 severe Bark Incluslon(s) (Note Height) x Root Extension Restric d in Planbr x x x % % % X X X x So3 Maietn Deficit p•Draagld stroea••) �F my �R w Do �y �Ne %e •p; �9 e Q Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' Scisntif Nam, L $ o i 2 m+- y++ v 'c w c p.H WLCA Ntma from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ea& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - a Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genus,aPedw) a: m rno w c - 'm c a ^ >, u Spring-5 Survey miaSggme qpa .Few g YppFc W ns U1 Evdi L cs�o ft ._ ONWARD dE �'E$_- .e 2 2 2 2 2 2 n da'=go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 a aHmm 0.8 a''c iA uO�E, 361 X 26.6 26.6 halm.stone pine Plnw plwa 30/30 60/60 60%fair motl,rate X X Mawamd at 2fwt 65%overallcondition-ir". 362 X 28.6 28.6 halm.stone pin, Plnw plwa 2SMS 70110 70%9-1 9.w X Mawamdat2fwt 50%overall contlition"fail'. Trw out d maf. Quartos mbm(nof 10%overall contlltlon"very 969 X X ].2 ].2 retl wk WnfiedJ MIS SM60%Pair gootl Nwtletmg per„ pmning. Tres out d leaf. 5%ove1a11 contlltlon"very 364 X X 5.5 5.5 wkapaciss Quartos sp. 12/8 60/40 40Yo pwr motl,rab X 5 Nwda training pmning. pow.. 365 X X 7.3 7.9 wthern magndia Magnollagmndlfiom 18113 40/40 40%pwr pwrt w X 10%overall contlltlon"very pwr'. 966 X 17.0 17.0 Malian stone pine pinus pinea 18125 SM 60%fair 9-1 N X Mm-i-1 at 3.5 f- 50%overa11-ndition"fair'. 367 X X 24.3 24.3 Malian stun,pin. Plnw pin.. 2SM0 111 45%pwr 9-1 N 5 X 20%ovax11-.dkbn"very Pw.. 30 X 20.2 20.2 Malian stun,pin. Plnw pin.. 2SM0 111 45%pwr 9-1 N OR 7 X M....md M3.5 30%overall condition"poor'. feet. 30 X 23.8 23.8 Xalmn stun,pin. Plnw pin.. 2SM0 SM Mhiir pwrwmw 10 Measured at 2.0 38%overall contlition'poor". feat. tree spwlw out of V,r'dy epaciss in 910 X 5.7 5.7 We (Genus,sP.h) MIS7S/S5 65%fair mW.rat0 spring after full mafwt. 371 X 26.3 26.3 Al,ppo pin, Plnw halapansls 30M5 80/60 7M ii-I 9.w X Comin... 50%overall condition malnstemsatl a[5 feN. 372 X 21.6 18.7 40.3 Malian stun,pin. Plnw plwa 30M5 80110 75%11-1 9-1 N X 65%overall condition 373 X X 7.4 7.4 outhern magnolia Magnolia gmndlfiom MIS 25/25 25%wry very pwr X 20%-mil-.dkbn"very Poor Pear.. 29 of 96 VaIIw Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA updated ozemll Condition ¢ E g a c N F Z ^ n Scientific Name u c g o n^ o u a^ q .g .e 3 n Sp��9 zo+surv.y Rating,8 NOTES 2017 m Comon Name c c - c gg E E o g ONWARD 1 g e' n e m a W w W B d en 'p ^>3eF ¢rca°wn a3 In parking lo[or BeniM1ana near 15 F V X X Hyatt construction project 3. X X 7.2 7.2 Wlip tree Udodendrontullplhm 12/8 20/10 Poor very Poor N X Sand #1225. In parking lot d BeniM1ana near X X Hyatt cansWc[ian project 375 X X 5.5 5.6 Osep lre. Udadandron Wllpl 12/8 20/10 1 P-rY very P%%r X SarWis%122G 10%overa0 corMt lon"very 25%wry X Poor". 376 X X 5.6 5.6 ewtM1arn magndia Magmlla grand"- 10/10 25/25 Poor v%ry Poor 20%overa11 contlltlon"very X 7.6 7.6 aootho magndia Magmllagxnd)gom 18/12 35/05 35%poor Poor X Poor". 20%wry X 20%-11 condMon"vary 7.0 aoothl magndia MagmllagmndMom 20/14 2W" Poor very Poor Poor 978 X % ].0 25%wry X 20%overall condMon"very 478 X X 6.5 6.5 amth,mmagnNia Mnmllagmnddlom 10/12 25/25 Poor very Poor Poor' Poor' very X 20%owmll condMlon"v.ry 20H. Poor W 980 X X 7.4 7.4 swth.mmagndia MagmllagrandMom 20/10 20/20 Poor very 381 X 20.0 10.7 37.7 Malian atone Pin. Plnus plena 25/00 75/55 fair moderate 5 X 43%overall contlition"poor". X 55%wemll condition"fair". 982 X 20.8 20.8 Melon Won.Pin. Plnus plena 25/25 TOM 65%iair motlemte E OR X 44%overall contlition"poor". 989 X 18.5 18.5 Melon stone Pine Plnus plena 25/00 80/65 74%gootl good X Measured M 2.0 50%overa11 condition 984 X 22.0 12.0 Malian Mon.Pin. prom plrma 25IN 70160 Muir moderate 3 3 feet' 3" X 30.2 30.2 Malisn Won.Pin. Plnm plrrea 25/05 Get" 38%poor mW..w S 5 X 42%overa11 condition"pool'. 10%ovem11 contlltlon"very M-ry X X poor". 980 X X 0.5 0.5 soWhem magndia Magmlla grandlllom iLe 15115 Poor very Poor 1 30 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA Ea o'p'Y 8 °rY �° E a _ ;- r=• o. ^' common Name 6cientRc Name a 'e 8 _ _ species) ac`d W na u; m c 5 UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon Y @@ WLC/Notea from ,p n _3 c d o a c �aq V'rc m '- m g Ratings 8 NOTES 201] c •�4 °e p .FSw gg g u dii t! gE cE�u— ._E prang 2015Surv�y SovE go W! S¢¢ Ea8�Wdlu ONWARD 98T X X ].8 7.8 seutharnmagneii. Magnollagnendiflore MIS 20W 20%very Peen vary peer X 30%overall condition"poor'. 388 X X 7.5 7.5 awtham magndia MagnollagmndMom 18/15 20/20 20%vary Poor verY poor x 15%euseV cnntlXlen"vary poor. 389 X 31.9 22.3 34.2 Ulm.atone pine Pines plrrea 90/95 50/90 bT%pwr motlemte 2 X M%overall condition"poor. 390 X 13.2 13.0 26.2 Ulm.atone pine Pines plwa 2S/15 80/30 4S%pwr gootl N N 9 X 9S%ovaraN wrrdilion}wor. 381 x 12.1 12.0 24.4 Kew.stone pine Pines plwa 25/30 80/60 67%Pair gootl E E 9 X 45%wom11 wnddten"poor. 392 x 14.6 14.6 Mien atone pine Pines plwa 25/18 80/66 68%tair gootl E x 40%overag wrWgxm"Pool'. 393 x 14.3 14.3 Malian atone pine Pines plrrea 20/20 TWO TO%gootl good E X 5S%overall contlition'Yair. 984 X 10.1 10.1 tree spites out of Iwf (Genus,sP.i.) 35120 80/65 75%gootl 90 985 X 9.8 8.9 tree spades out of tear (Genus,specie) 35/20 80165 75%gootl gootl W 986 X X 18.1 16.1 west retlwootl S"wIa samPeMrens 85/12 TWO 70%gootl motlemte Steep elope 15%overa11 contlltlon"very pool'. 387 X X 20.5 20,5 coed red wood 3 xlnora sampaMrorrs 65112 ]5/75 75%gootl moderate 23%overe0 oontlhlon"very Steep slope Pool'. 388 x 13.4 13.4 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhew 40125 80170 74%gootl good Steep alwe 389 x 11.3 11.3 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhdW 35/15 3000 30%pwr Poor Steep slope 31 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA Ea o'p'Y 8 °rY �p E a _ ;- r=• o. a2 ;2° � a—nn`a °c° �a•a 24^' (GSceinustR,sP Neciea) ap' Sej _E'ppp Fa�S`_wu °gg'cs g8 c 3W WLCA No from» UPtletlOContlXlo n? Png 253urvRatngs 8 NOTES 2017 2 ONWARD O 400 x E1.3 21.3 shameI ash Fraxi—uhtlel gW25 60f60 55%.fair motlemte 6 Steep slope 401 X 20.2 20.2 Shame aeh Fr d.-uhtlel 45120 SW35 IOYa poor motlerMe W 8 10 On staeP slope. 402 X 18A 18A Shame)ash FraXlnus ufMW 45f25 60f95 55Ya fair gootl 6 On steep slope. 409 x t5.0 15.0 Shame)ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 40f18 4pf40 40%pwr poor W 6 8 On steep sbpa. 4W x 25.1 25.7 Shame aeh Fraslnus uhtlel SW35 4040 40%poor poor SW vaNws e6va0ws On steep slope. /05 X 29.5 29.5 Shame I aeh Fraslnus uhtlel 6505 4005 40%pwr poor S S ] On steep slope. Me x % 17.4 1r.4 west mtlwood Sequoia sempeMmns SWO TWO TO%gnol motlemte On eteaP slope. 26%owm11 contlNbn"very Pwr". MT x x 4.1 4.1 swthemmagnolia Magrmllagm"ffl m 15f1 SM 5%ve ry Poor very pwr 0 to i0 0X{Deatl) US X X 5.9 3.8 9.7 annMn.m.gnoaa Magrm/fagmnm— I" 10/10 10X wry Pwr Yery pO°r eNvaCons 10%overall contlltlon"very Prn.. 40g x 18.1 16.3 west retlwootl Sequoia sempeMmw 55115 65f65 65%fair mod—w x 50%wman wnditm"lair. 410 X 20.7 20,7 oast redwood Sequoia senrpa w— 55)f3 65/65 6'SX fair motlerafe x 50%over111 cwtliti n"fair. 411 X 22.4 22.4 coast redwood Sequoia sem pervirens Sg/19 60f60 60%fair pwrto motl x 40%overall contlition"poor". 32A 32A Shame)ash Fraxlnus uhtlel fair gootl 5 Removetl Aug,201 32 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' Schntif Name - from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon rc r c y n - + Common Name o n c - n r n m g �_ Ratings 8 NOTES 201] x E N r n c c c c c c _m„ x w.c (Genoa,Pm- a: m rn o w c - c a O^ u SPdng 2p15 Survey +u � iF x x x i x x mia v�`m ?c4 �a Sggme qa .Faw g Ypc _ ns U� OL cE�o ft ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'E�o3 go as ide �2.� nQ 2$ 02 ¢cq o°wn a8 ¢''c aS uO�Ex pr .6 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel fi0/10 50/40 45%poor poor m Removetl Aug,201g. WIII neetl end""" Team proposes totranspiant 414 dl.mlonary X 225 225 X Califomla plafanus recemosa 53/JO 50/45 50°/(air motlerah W W OR retludlon pruning at tree.Currentcondlllon roughly transphnt sycamore -,id,of the same as prevlously notetl In canopy. past years. Team proposes totransplant 415 di-lonary X tB.J 18.1 X Callfomla pi.--recemosa 60/JO 50/SO 50%fair motlerate IN OR tree.Cumentconditi.n roughly transphnt sycamore the same as previously n-d In past years. Team proposes b transplant 416 discretionary X 1T.8 1T.8 X CalHamh plafanus mcemosa SW20 SO/SO W%lair mw.nte E OR tree.Current conditi.n roughly transplant sycamore the same as previously n-d In past Years. 18.2 18.2 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 90/25 TS/SS gootl gootl Removetl"r plan Augu12111. 418 X 11.5 11.5 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 30115 45/40 40%poor motl,- OR Removetl per plan August 2018. 17.3 17.3 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 35I40 IS- 55%lair mw.nte W OR Removetl per plan August 2018. 11.1 11.1 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 3- ]5(]0 70%gootl gootl W Removetl per plan August 2018. 421 X 13" 13.7 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 3- 50I50 50%fair poortomotl Removetl per plan August 2018. 14.3 14.3 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 30/J0 75/45 60%fair gootl 8 Removetl per plan August 2018. 429 X 28.1 28.1 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens ]0120 ]01]0 70%rlo mo..w Removetl per plan August 2018. 424 X 9J.6 JJ.6 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens ]0110 6-0 0%fair mW.mt0 Removetl per plan August 2018. 425 X 24.8 24.8 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens MIS ]W]0 TO%gootl .o.mte Removetl per plan August 2018. 33 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA x' Scientif Name L $ °i 2 y°+ v '< w c E H WLCA Nq from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Es& $'-rc r c y n - ° Common Name o n c - n >, w m �_ Ratings 6 NOTES 2017 y =a c c c c c c _„ °w.c (Genoa,aPedw) a: m mow c - c a ^ u- SPdng 2p15 Survey m _ rc°Aoa n _ _ _ _ _ _ L��wi 9 .e �d w Yc _ o� oL cdm+ei ft' ._ ONWARD ESd� F °i ed E=;=g — ._° 2 2 2 2 ° xx — 2— - ¢cqo°wLL �'cS UO=E e' H ]Li3 ufin-� IF 626 X 27.0 27.0 oast retlw++tl Sequoia sempervirens SM20 ]SI60 gogtl motlerew Removetl per plan 111—2019. 17.3 17.3 Shame)ash Fra 1—uhde/ VV20 40/00 E X R..—per plan August 2019. All A Tree m d-lining.Appears to be in 00%overall—diumn(P.), 428 29.0 29.0 Shamelash F—m—uWw Goon 50/50 60%fair p°°rt°motl W —normal leaf senescence plus twig antl branch dieback iram tlrougtht-intlucetl tlecline. lining.Appears to be rail contlitlon IPoor), Cetl+minant Tree Is[o be re$oval antl Shame)ash Fra 1—uhde) -4 s ]-SS 6S%fair gootl stems fork a[ pos[etl as such a of May,2020 yin 13 feet. (approved by City d Cupe .. m CXy Metasequaia TREE IS DEAD.TREE 030 X X 2]A 2]A glint aequda glypfosfroboldes 1545 6545 55%hir poor to motl Tree was limbetl up. REQUIRESREMOVALFROM THE LANDSCAPE. Tree In d cllne,wkh a current 031 27.9 27.9 Shama)ash F inua uWw 6545 45/10 00%poor poor to motl W E 9 overall conditlon of 30%or .P1 Tree In decline,with a current 032 20.0 20.0 Shama)ash F inua uWW 55135 50/60 55%falr poortomotl W overall.-did-d00%a "Poor". Tree in tlecline,-h a current 033 16.9 16.9 Shama)ash F inua uWW 6=5 TUN 63%fair rp—I E E overall c.di5an or 50%ar "Fair".("Fair"rangec from 50% h 69%). Metwequda 2S%very Rods were—d TREE IS DEAD.TREE 430 X X 19.1 29.1 glint-I... gyproabo6dryes ]5H2 35/20 p— poor E X tludng InaWllatlon REQUIRES REMOVAL FROM d ADA walkway. THE LANDSCAPE. 2S%very W GR tlud R—wveretl 035 X 31.1 31.1 Sh 6-5ama)ash F sinus uhtlei 65 40/20 - poor ngsitlewalk Same—ditlonasprevious. replacement O36 23.0 12.0 35.0 oast retlwootl Sequoi+—Pe .- 65H6 TUN 65%fair 11-1 3 Diameters as5mdetl. 43] 27.7 27.7 Shama)ash F inua uWW 80130 3" 30%poor poor W 9 Tree c---Uy in the same wnditWn as previously notatl. Ranh wveretl O36 X X 23.5 23.5 Shamelash F inua uWW Swill awm 3]%poor motlareb E tludng sitlewalk replacement 34 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA IT S + E o E c f z a x' Scisntif Name L $ o f 2 m+- y++ v 'c w e C H WLCA No.a from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Es& $'-rc r$ y n - o Common Name o n_ c -m n n m g - a Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genoa,aPeuw) e m mow c - 'm c a ^ >, u Spring-5 Survey miaSggme qpa .Few g YppFc W ns U� Evdi L cs�o ft ._ ONWARD dE �'E$_- .e 2 2 2 2 2 2 n 'E go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i +'2 & H121 + ¢Hamm 28 a''c a4 uO�E+ Crown raising 439 X 27.0 27.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempeMrens 75/16 70170 70%gootl 9ootl X Pruning was 45%overallcontlibmn"poor". per" newlimb uP M.tree. Contlitim estimetetl Tree currently In 28%ovsrell .0 X 18.7 18.7 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 60/30 35/35 35%poor very Poor W W 1 prior to spring contltion(Very Poor).Tres bafout augg-dby WLCA lobe removetl. Roots wveretl Tree currently In 28%ovemll M1 X 21.2 21.2 Shamel a,h Fraxlnus uhtlel 60/45 SUM 50%fair mW..t. 1 tluring sitlewalk contlXlon(Very Poor).Tree replacement augg-d by WLCAW be removetl. Roo.seal tluring eitlewalk Tree app-to be in tlecline. M2 31.2 31.2 Shamel a,h Fraxlnus uhtlel 60/45 60/45 53%fair mw.mb, W S replacement.Will Current overall contlition is 4S% nestl entlweight (P-). l-1-don Pruning. 443 X 41.0 41.0 west retlwootl Sequoia-,Nbvirens 70/20 75M 68%fair 9-1 5 Cable Ins.11tlatwlon 45%overa11 contlition"poor". 44L 21.5 21.5 Shamel a,h Fraxlnus uhtlel SW30 70/S0 60%fair matlerate W 15.0 15.0 SM1amel as1, Fraxlnus uhtlel 60/18 SO/50 50%fair matlerate N X Removetl as of August 2019. 446 X 21.1 21.1 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 70I15 7- 75%gootl good 77 Removetl as o(August 2019. 17.5 Shamel-1, Fuxin..uhtlel 6.20 5w5o 52%fair poor[o motl N Removetl as o(August 2019. oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 70I10 -60 60%fair metlerate E Treewaslimbetlup. Removetlasof August2019. oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 70I10 -60 60%fair matlerate E Treewaslimbetlup. Removetlasof August2019. 450 x 15.5 15.5 wst retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 70/10 I- 55%1air motlere. E Treewaslimbetlup. 50%overa1lsontlition"fair". 451 x 19.6 19.6 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 50/25 70/55 60%fair 9-1 W 35 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E o E c f z a x' Sciantif Name L $ o f 2 m+- y++ v 'c w e C H WLCA Nobs from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ea& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - a Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 ly a r$a c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genoa,aPoclea) a: m mo w c - 'm c a ^ r u Spring 2015 Survey miaSggme qpa .Few g YppFc W ns U1 EvL cs�o ft ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as iris �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + ¢¢kaw+ n8 ¢''c aS uO�E+ Cur,A condition rating is 452 X 21.5 21.5 Shamelash FY-I-uh&I SW30 SW35 40%poor pooriomod W 0to2 roughly the same as noted in previous years. 453 X X 15.0 15.0 Shamelash Fra I-uh&I SY10 Will 10%Very very poor Poor Current contlition rating m 454 X 29.4 29.4 Shamelash Fra I-uh&I SSW SW40 47%poor poortomod 12 Roots tlamaged. roughly the sameas previously noted in past years. 455 17.7 17.7 Shamel a,h Fraxlnus uhtlel 45/18 Moll 33%poor poor E Root,tlamaged. 456 X 22.3 22.3 Shamel a,h Fr I.-uh&I 60/20 40/35 37%poor poor W W 1S Same condhbn ratlng as noted In prior years. May be declining in condition. 457 X 28.5 28.5 SIN amel ash Fr I.-uh&I 6SMS sww SS%fair mW..t. W Current contlition is roughly 45%(Poor). 458 X 25.1 25.1 SIN amel ash Fraxlnus uhdel 60/35 90/40 95% various Bark.lofting off. Same condition rating as nolod poor poor W motl ebvatlons Phloamlbark In prior years. disortler. 459 X 31.8 31.8 SIN amel ash Fr I.-uh&I 75/45 60/60 60%fair mw.mb, Root,tlamaged. 460 31.8 31.8 SIN amel ash Fr I.-uh&I 65/45 VMS 58%fair mw.mb, Root,tlamaged. Tree declining.C-t overall "1 25.5 25.5 SIN amel ash Fr I.-uh&I SW40 SUM SM fair poorW mW 1S condMon la roughly 35%(Poor). E-..W.twig dleback apparent. Tree declining.Current overall ondition m roughly 20%(Very 482 X X 15.3 15.3 Shamel ash Fr I.-uh&I MIS sea 45%poor mod.- a Paar).Tissue necrosis and bark nclusion at fork n-d,Trees in very poor contlition are typically aug..-to be r..-d. Tree appears to be in decline 483 21.0 21.0 Shamel ash F inua uWW W45 7510 70%good good W Roots tlamaged d..to chronic tlrought .ditions.Current overall ontli0on roughly 55%(Fair). Tree appears to be in decline 484 X 34.1 34.1 Shamel ash F inua uWW 55/30 65145 48%poor mod.- E 0.5 due to chronic drought ondition..Current overall condition roughly 40%(Poor). 36 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA updated overall condition E g a c N F Z ^ n gcienti6c Name u c g o n^ a Z u y.m to a o a^ q t.! ;.E n Sp��9 zo+su wm.y Ratings 6 NOTES 2017 Y Common Name c c — c gg E Ed ..5 o g ONWARD It Ee E ^ �. „ r g V n am q u (Genus.species 1 g e' n $d m a W w W B d lu "p ^>3eF E§ SoEe = 2 2 2 2 2 2 ga5 Io�E�= xo n' Tree ie ¢rca°wn a3 F I. anne 16 Roob tlamagetl, condition a res noted tetl in previous 465 228 228 Shamelaeh Faxlnus uhdel vV30 SW45 50%fair raud.ote W years. Trea appears W be In decline due to chronic drought 8 condiions.Currant overall 466 28.3 28_3 Shame`s Ftx.suhdW 6s/30 VV45 50%fair motl to gootl E condition roughly 40%(Poor). Tree declining.Current overall corWiden is roug ley-4 Very pod).Tissue necrosis antl bark ghamel ash F exinua uhdei 65/45 50/30 37%poor mcd.mt. OR 3.10 inclusion at fork acted.Tree.in 48T X 25.6 25.8 su...ted to1he ermov d. Tree declining with apparent eaten twig tlieback.Current mall condition ie roughly 20% Roots damaged. (Very Poor).Tissue necrosis and bark inclusion at hark 6 24.6 Sham.I ash Fraxlnus uhow SIMS 40410 40%poor poor Bond Trees in very pad 486 X contlbion.b typically auggeatetl[o be removed. Tree ntly in W g OR 12 Raote damaged. conditon as noted in previous J69 252 252 Shamel ash Frew—uh" SUM 40130 38%pear poor years. Appears to be experiencing orm.1 Fag kaf senescence 470 277 27.7 ghamel ash Famine uhakd OMIS 4 s 40%Fear poor (leaf drop). Appears to bee-perlancing ormal Fall kaf een-a.nce 471 149 14.9 ghamel ash Famine uhaki =15 45145 45%Foor poor W W (leaf drop). Appears to be experiencing normal Fail leaf senescetce 472 18A 16.4 ghamel ash Fexinus uhakd 50/20 4S/45 45%Foor poor E (leaf drop). Tre.appears to he somewhat 9 and 10(not Roots damaged declining.Current oveall 473 315 31.5 Sham.l ash Frew—uhdw BW45 75%5 66%fair good verified) condition is roughly S7%(Fair). Tree appears to be somewhat deIR cllnin9Gurrent overall 474 25.3 25.3 Sham.l ash F inua uhdW 60130 75*0 66%fair good E cmdhich is roughly S9%(Fair). Tree la declining,with an .stlmakd 43%overall condition Roots damaged. rating IPoorl.Leaf fall appears 475 26.7 28.7 Sham.t ash Fa.Ymus uhdw 80145 7W65 66%fak maderab to ba a combo ar normal kaf fall plus twig and branch dleback. 37 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' S.W.Uf Name L $ ,i 2 m+- y++ v 'c w c C H WLCA Nobs from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ea& $'-rc r c y n - o Common Name o n c - o. >, n m g �_ Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 N r n c c c c c c _m„ ,w.c (Genoa,aPeuea) a: m mow c - c a ^ u SPring 2p15 Survey +u � iF x x x i x x mia v�`m ?c4 �a Sggme qa .Few g Ypc _ ns U� OL cs�o ft ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'2 63 go as ids �2.� nQ 20 02 & of 5$ '. ¢oq A°wn o.8 ¢m'c$ uO�Ex Removetl in July,2.21,with .2 Shamelash FaxI.-uhtlef 9ms 3W. 96%Poor poor m pe�mit per plan,by Vallco Property Owner LLC. 13.11 Shamel ash Faxlnus uhtlef 3.20 20120 20%very Removetl in July,2021,with Poor very Poor perm it,per plan,by Vallco Property Owner LLC. 0%Dead as notetl 113112021. High risk of fallure and Impact with ground Org-within 1 16.11 16.9 oast retlwootl Sequoia s jPooirens 40I15 SOI50 50%fa1r poor year.Remove tree ASAP.This tree may have alreatly been partially removetl tlue to fallure, as of April,2021.REMOVED WITH PERMIT JULY 2021. 0%Dead as notetl 113112021. High risk of failure antl impact with grountl targets within 1 4" % 2.1 22.1 oast retlwootl Sequoia semoovinos 50120 010 0%d.od year.Remove tree ASAP.This may have alreatly been partially removetl tlue to failure, s of April,2021.REMOVED aWITH PERMIT JULY 2021. Removetl In July,2021,will, 13.1 13.1 Shamel ash Fraxinus uhtlef 30I10 45I45 45%poor poor SE "_k par plan,by Valk, Property Owner LLC. Removetl In JUIy,2021,wIM 481 % 20.0 20.0 Shamel ash Fraxinus uhtlef W25 45I45 45%Poor poor W permit.per plan,by Vallco Property Owner LLC. Removed In July,2021,with 482 % 9.0 9.0 Shamel ash Fraxinus uhtlef 30110 30120 25%poorvery poor INpermit,per, plan,by Valk, Property Owner LLC. Removetl in July,2021,wllh 483 % 12.7 12.7 Shamel ash Fraxinus uhtlef 30116 50/40 50%fair motlemte N OR permit,per plan,by Vallco Property Owner LLC. Removetl in July,2021,with 484 % 15.9 15.9 Shamel ash Fraxinus uhtlef 30118 60150 55%fair motlemta permit,per plan,by Vallco Property Owner LLC. Removetl In July,2021,with 485 % 13.7 13.7 Shamel ash Fraxinus uhtlef 30120 55155 55%fair motlemta E parmk par plan,by Valk. Property Owner LLC. 0%Dead as notetl 113112.21. High risk of failure antl impact in 2021.Remove tree ASAP. 22.3 22.3 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrena 10111 ]O170 TO%gootl motlemte This tree may have alreatly been removetl,r partitly cued dne ea bil.re,ac of April,2021.REMOVED JULY 2021 WITH PERMIT. 38 of 96 IN 111111M No In loss pom how IllbEENSEAMMEEMMIli how r "—Il"I p1l",by V III* PWdy�...LLC. p,.it,p,pl-'.,byV.Ik 11,1111—ILLC, ��y—,LLC. h dw 22%- "—IL",pI..,byVIk. Vallw Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E o E c f z a x' Sdentif Name L $ .i 2 8+- y++ WLCA N.roa from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon rc r c y n - + Common Name o n c - n r n m g �_ Ratings 8 NOTES 201] x E N r n c c c c c c _m„ .w.c (Genoa,aPmr- a: + ra o w c - c . ^ u SPHng 2p15 Survey Sggme qpa .Few g Ypc _ ns U� OL cs�o ft ._ ONWARD dEEo = E' 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'E�o3 go as ids 1d 3MWIEM 2.� nQ 2$ QO�Ex Deaf.Hbh a eztreme risk d failure and Impact with grou nJ targets within 1 year of 2020.Remove ASAP.This hee 1.4 21.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 1.11 0/0 0%d.d may have already been r ved or partially removed due to failure,as.f April,2021. REMOVED WITH PERMIT JULY 2021. 0%Deatl.High or exreme rick d failure antl impact..h grauntl targets within 1 year d 15%very 20 11.Remove ASAP.This tree 19.0 19.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervirens 55115 15/15 Poor very poor X steep slope. may have already been vetl or partially re-d retlue to failure,as of April, 2021.REMOVED WITH PERMIT JULY 2.21. 0%Deatl.High or extreme risk d failure nd impact..h grauntl targets within 1 year d 2020.Remove ASAP.This free 2a.a 2a.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervirens 55112 0/0 D%d-d X may have alreatly been vetl or partially rem d doe to tailore,as d April,2021. REMOVED WITH PERMIT JULY, 2D21. Rem d In July,2021,with 503 % 6.7 6.7 vergreen pear Pyres kawakamii 1W14 014D o%Poor Poor s 5 Permit,Per plan,by Valk. Property Owner LLC. Removed In July,2021,with 5" % 9.9 9.0 18.9 oak.pecles Q.--- 35130 BOl5o 60%fair gootl s StaeP slope permit,per plan,by Valk. Property Owner LLC. Removed in July,2021,with so % 32.3 32.3 oast retlwootl sequoia sempervirens 50135 ]01]0 70%gootl motlerete % Sroap slope permit,per plan,by Vallco Property Owner LLC. Removed in July,2021,with so % 10.0 10.0 vergreen pear Pyres kawakamii 25115 40/CD o%Poor Poor E E % PIrebllght jhhh Odn. permit,per plan,by Vallco Property Owner LLC. 507 % % 7.6 7.6 vergreen Pear Pyres kawakamii 18115 2012D 20%very Rem d In July,2021,with poor Wry Poor N N lr PIrebllght 1d 11 n. "MIL par plan,by Valco Property Owner LLC. Removed In July,2021,with so % 10.9 10.9 vergreen pear Pyres kawakamii 25125 40130 35%poor poor N N % PIrebllght Infec[lon. permit.Per plan,by Vallc. Properly Owner LLC. 15%very Removed In July,2021,with so % % 7.2 8.9 5.5 19.8 southern magndla Magnolia grantlieara 25I15 isms poor Wry Poor N % permit,per plain by Valk. Property Owner LLC. Quad in July,2021,with 510 X 28.0 28.0 oast retlwootl sequoia sempervirens 60121 00/80 80%g-d g..d % permit,per plan,by vallco Property Owner LLC. 40 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA d9 aa F _ C oc c + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Nama L $ o i 2 8+- y++ v '1 w c P.H WLCA Notae from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon rc r c y n - o Common Name o n c - n `o n i'm g - a Ratings S NOTES 2017 x E N r n c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genoa,aPedea) a: m mo w c - c a ^ u SPring 2p15 Survey +u � iF x x x i x x mia v�`m ?c4 2a Sggme qa .Faw g Ypc _ ns UiEE� c��o ONWARD dEEo = E' 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'E6d3 go as ide �2.� nQ 2$ 02 & ufE '+ ¢cg o°wn a8 ¢''c aS uO�Ex Removetl in July,2021,with A vergreen pear Pyres kawakamll 2MIS 40/50 44%poor poor I,'—Fireblight permit per plan,by Vallco infection. Property Owner LLC. Removetl in July,2021,with 6.0 1.1 outhernmagndia Magnolla gmndiflom 1518 1130 37% rm poor matleraM X pe it,per plan,by Vallco Property Owner LLC. Removetl in July,2021,with 5.6 5.6 ou[hern magndia Magnolla gmndiflom 18I10 40/40 40%poor poor E X Permit Per plan,by Vallco Property Owner LLC. Removetl in July,2021,with 514 X 0.4 4.4 ou[hern magnolia Magnolla gmndlflora 18I6 40/40 40%poor poor E X perm it,per plan,by Vallco Property Owner LLC. Removetl in July,2021,with 515 10.5 vergreen pear Pyres kawakamll 25I20 30/30 30%poor poor E —blight infection. permit per plan,by Vallco Property Owner LLC. 20%overall condition"very 10.6 vergreen pear Pyres kawakamll 25I20 30/40 35%poor poor E —blight infection.poor'.REMOVED WITH PERMIT JULY,2021. 15%overall condition"very o.t rn magnolia Pyres kawakamll 1-7 40130 301poor poortomotl E poor'.REMOVED WITH PERMIT JULY,2021. Out of baf.Overall INS X 23.2 23.2 SIN amel ash Fraxlnus uh&1 50/30 55/w 58%fair poor to mW w w condNon verify in spring after bafout 519 X 7.6 7.6 coast retlwootl Ssquola serape .- 40110 0/0 0%DEAD da TREE REMOVED FROM LANDSCAPE 521 X X 20.2 20.2 SIN amelash Fraxlnus uh&1 55/16 30125 28%very Poor w Poor 522 X 14.3 14.1 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhdel 95/16 10/10 10%Very Poor very poor W 5 TREE REMOVED FROM LANDSCAPE. 41 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA Ea o'8'Y 8 °rY �° E a _ ;- r=• o. ^' common Name ScientRc Name a 'e 8 _ °'s 8 3_ @` o s _ o gg —n`a oc°»�a•a 24 (Genus,sPeciea) 2° Sej _Epm FagSc`wu .ggc g ° W WLC/No fom UPtletlOCotlXo? Png 253urvRatings 8 NOTES 2017 2 ONWARD 529 t0.6 10.6 Chinaaalm Ulmus P—Imila /0130 T5fr5 75%®oo1 SOPtl E X US 17.6 17.6 Shamelash Fr d.-uhtlel /0125 95/35 95%poor pow W W 526 6.7 6.7 Chinpaalm Ulmus paM{olla M12 65/50 55%fair motlemte E X 5. 3.2 8.2 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel MIS TOM 0%Rib- eooa s s s28 11.1 11.1 Chin...1m Ulmus pimoolla 2505 TOM 66%f it motlemte x 529 12.7 12.7 Shamel aah Fraxlnus uhtlel 90t20 45/95 43%poor poorto motl W W 5]0 10.4 10.4 Chi npaalm Ulmus paMrolla 30t30 75f65 73%U-1 mw.mte S X "1 9.2 9.2 Shamel aah Fraxlnus uhtlel 30/1G 50/40 95%ppP! W g 532 12,1 12.3 Chinaaa aha Wmus P,vftblla Soto 6510 70%e—I W. SE X 03 132 132 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 30t30 OWN 60%fair motlemt. 534 10.2 102 Chinese elm U�s PaMf Ik 40M 70'60 T0%Oootl Sootl E X 05 20.6 20.6 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 3505 Gate) 0%fair soda SSG x 12.1 12.1 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 3pt2) 20%v., 2N2) Poor very Paw 42 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA Ea o'8'Y 8 °rY �° E a _ ;- r=• o. ^' common Name ScientRc Name UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon pL q Noteafrom ,° n _3 c d o a m g Ratings S NOTES 201] `oc •�4 °e .FSw gg g ° K`pt! gE cEa�o— ._E Pnng 20153urvey Epa �� a, ONWARD 13.1 Chinaaalm Ulmus P—Imila 05/05 60/s5 60Yo fair motlemte E X 506 t8.8 19.9 Shamelash Fr d.-W.W 95/05 5O/45 SOYo fa'u poor to motl 09 12.1 12.7 Chinpaalm Ulmus paM{olla 25/00 T6/65 70%go 1 gootl E E X Sao 2t.8 21.9 Shamelash Frulnus uhtlel 4545 6s/s5 60%fair mw.mte OR 611 12.5 12.5 Chin paalm Ulmus pimoolla 30/00 60/50 55%fair w.mt. X 592 13.7 13.7 Shamel aah Fraxlnus uhtlel 95/25 50/50 50%fair motlerate W w 590 15.2 iS.2 Shamel aah Fraxlnus uhtlel 90125 35I00 0q%poor motlemb S OR 5 594 14.1 16.1 Chin paalm Ulmus paMrolla 40/05 TWO 67%fair motlemt. E E X 595 17A 17.0 Shamelash Frulnus uhCel case 75155 w%tair gooa w Went rPNu et a taoc 596 112 112 Chi npaalm Ulmua paMrolla 30/05 T0/60 66%fair motlemts E E X 597 X 12.5 12.5 Shamel ash Fraxlrws uhtlel 40M 2&Y5 26%vary Poor very Poor W w OR TREE REMOVED FROM LANDSCAPE. 599 16.3 16.0 Shamel aeh Fraslnus uhrhl 45J00 65✓AS 61%/air motlerete W 43 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Name L $ o i 2 9+- y++ v 'c w c P.H WLCA N+tae from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ea& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genoa,Pm- e m mo w c - 'm c a ^ r u Spnnq-5 Survey miaSggme qpaYppFc W ns U� Evdi L cs�o fr ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + n8 ¢m'c.A uO�E+ 550 17.5 17.5 Shamelash Faxlnus uh&I SW30 75/65 70%800tl 800tl W TREE REMOVED FROM 99 LANDSCAPE. m 11.2 11.2 Chinpeelm Ulmus paM7olla 25/25 60/60 60%fair motlemte N N X 553 14.2 1- Shamelash Fraxlnus uh&I W20 75/65 70%9 Nootl W W Tree out of leaf.ID 5% 6.0 6.0 elm species Ulm-sP. 20/10 7WS 75%800tl 800tl nol verMw at time 0—ftin6. 05 X 9.8 9.8 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 20/15 10/10 10%Very very poor 0 to 10 Poor m 16.8 16.8 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 30/30 55/60 58%fair w.mt. 0t.1 Vehicle impact scar. 557 12.9 12.9 Shamelash Faslnus uhtlel SW25 35/35 35%poor poor W W 558 13.8 13.8 Chinpeelm Ul—paMblla 35/35 7510 73%800tl 800tl N N X m 15.9 15.9 Shamelash Faxlnus uh&I SW25 55/50 "%hir poortomotl W 560 11.5 11.5 Chinpeelm Ulmus paM7olla 30/30 6500 68%hir mo—w E X 561 13.7 13.7 Chinpeelm Ulmus paM7olla 30/30 70/5) 60%hir 800tl N X 562 13.8 11.8 $hemelesh F7axlnus uhtlel 30/30 —1 98%poor poor N X 44 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA E _ C oc c 8 :: + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Name L $ o i 2 8+- y++ v 'c w c P.H WLCA Nptac from Uptlatetl Overall ContlXlon Ee& rc r c y n - + Common Name o n c - n >, n m g �_ Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 N r n c c c c c c _m„ x w.c (Genoa,aPeuea) a: + mow c - c a ^ u SPrin82p15 Survey +u � iF x x x i x x mia v�`m z9c4 �a Sggme qpa .Faw g YpcOL cs�o ft ._ ONWARD 2 dEEo = E' 2 2 2 2 2 2 n di'Eo3 go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ '2 ¢cq o°wn a8 ¢''c.A uO�'E TREE REMOVED FROM LANDSCAPE. 564 X 14.8 14.8 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhtlel 36f25 25/20 23%wry Pwr very poor W W TREE REMOVED FROM LANDSCAPE. 566 X 17.s 17.s SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhtlel 4S/35 40/90 40%pwr motlemt0 W W 567 X 16.2 16.2 SM1amelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 30/15 25/25 25%Very very poor Poor 568 18.0 18.0 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhtlel 4505 75/65 70%800tl 800tl W 568 13.5 13.5 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 30f25 70/65 68%fair 800tl W 570 12.7 12.7 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 1-0 50/30 40%pwr motlerab W W X 571 22.7 22.7 west retlwootl Sequoia sempaMrens 53/20 60/60 60%Pair mW.— X 56%overall contlition 572 31.6 31.6 west retlwootl Sequoia sempaMrens 53/20 60/45 SS%Pair motlemb 25 X 60%overall contlition"fair'. 573 16.5 16.5 west retlwootl Sequoia sempaMrens 50/15 60/SO 53%fair motlemb X 37%overall contlition"pool'. 574 25.6 25.6 west retlwootl Sequoia sempeMrens 53/15 60/60 60%Pair motlemte X 46%overall contlition"poor'. 575 12.0 12.0 westrWwootl Sequoia serape .- 35f10 60/40 47%pwr motlemte X 35%overall contlition"poor". 45 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA updated oeera6 condtion ¢ E g a c N F Z ^ n Scientific Name u $ o n•- o Z 2 u ym to a o 3 n yp�,oe 2y15 gurvay Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 mon Name Com c c — c E E o g ONWARD (Genus.species 1 g s ar g a m e W w W o w "gip ^>3 � F ¢tea°wn a3 X 55%overa11 contlition 576 32.1 13.4 12.2 57.7 weal retlwootl Sequoia sempeMrons SW25 TWO 70%good poor varbus X 45%overall contlition"poor'. sn YI.6 VA weal redwood Sequoia sempeMrans MIS 40M 95%poor poor alevagons X 50%overall contlition•'fair. 578 17.1 17.1 west redwood SKoola sempam- W12 60/6U 60%fair moderate X 40%Overall wntlilion"poor". IDS 1T.T 17.7 west redwood $equoia sempeMrons 50/12 65/65 65%fair nodemw X 55%overall contldiw•'Fafr. SM 31.5 9.0 40.5 west redwood Segoola sempeMmns 60/20 75P75 75%good moderate X 45%overa11 contlition"poor. rRI 215 105 320 west redwood $equoia—e Mrons 60/15 60/60 60%Pair moderate X 60%werall conditon"Fair. %2 31.7 31.7 west redwood Sequoia sempeMrons 7=5 Sea 80%good good 20%ovem11 condition"very 589 X 8.9 8.3 west ratlwoetl Sequoia—e Mrons 35/6 201V 2 pnorry verypoor X Pam'. X 60%o—mll contlition"fair'. 584 26.9 26.9 waet ratlwoetl Sequoia sempeMmns 70/20 65/65 65%fair moderate X So%overall condition•'fair'. as 15.9 7.9 29.2 west ratlwootl Sequoia sempeMmns awls 65/65 65%fair moderate X 45%overa11 contlition"poor'. 586 25.9 25.9 west ratlwootl Segoola sempeMrons SM3 65165 w%%IT maderab X 52%overall condition"fair". 587 19.9 19.9 west ratlwootl Sequoia sempcMrons 50/14 65/65 65%hir moderate X 47%overall contlition"poor". 580 21.0 21.0 cossl redwood Sequoia senlpaMrons 50112 60160 fi0%tur matlerate 46 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA Ea o'p'Y 8 °rY �q E a _ ;- l°`-_• o. ^' common Nama ScientRc Name -nan`7 c°»Ca a 24 (Genus,sPeciea) 2 ej _ FaS`d °gg'cs g8o 0 W3 a ey UPtletlOContlXlo nWLC/No u Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 2 iae �d �Zo° 588 23.3 23.3 west mtlwootl Sequoia sempaMnans 60/12 65/65 65%.fair grwtnata x 62%overa11 condition"fair'. 580 25.5 5.0 30.5 west ratltvwtl Sequoia semps raw 60110 30/40 35%pwr ppor x 35%overall condition"pool'. 581 21.2 21.2 west rativ.'wtl S equola sempeMrons 55/10 50/90 gg%pwr poor x 50%overa11 condition"fair'. 582 x 25.0 25.0 west ratltvwtl Sequoia sempeMrons 60/0 25/35 28%wry wry Pmar X P00r 50%falrm of 2/VM20. 583 14A 14.4 west ratltvwtl Sequ014 sampeMrons 40110 30/30 30%pwr pwrto raw g 0 to 5 X 40%poor m of 7/28/2020. 584 10.1 18.1 vast ratlwootl Sequ014 sampe raw 50/13 Mira 50%fair mnd.raw x 50%fair as ol]/2W2020. 585 18.2 10.2 west nnba tl SK-1a..Wp rons 25/15 40/25 90%pwr m°tlerate 25(ato. marlspm) x so%fail mor]/zvzozo. 586 12.0 12.0 oast n tao Sequoia smnpeMrons 55/0 SW40 45%pwr pwrto moa g x 20%very Poor as of 7/20I2020. ae of T/20I2020.Remove B.3 out rodvmotl Saquola sempeN(rens 35/to 0/0 o%tleatl tleatl at request of neighbor,in January,20z1.City took 6 580 X 18.5 18.5 coast redwood Se quoia sempervirens 60/6 90/10 20%0 varry wry poor x �hmghft Nay be as high as.%poor as malnstem of]/2012020.But shear crack longltudinally. d-gratlss condition rating. 58g 27.0 27,0 toutr a°tl Saqu0/a sampe -s ]6]25 65l65 65%fair mad.raw x 50%fair as of 7/20/2020. 600 10.0 18.8 west ratlwogtl Saqu°Ia sempavt n 65/0 sea 45%pwr pwr W Cankardavalwing X tm trunk at S lest 30%poor as of 7I2012020. akva3on. 601 25.5 25.5 vast naNnn i S"wIa strnti-Im" 70114 40140 40%pwr poor x 30%poor as a 712012020. 47 Of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA IT S + E o E c f z a x' Scientif Neme L $ o f 2 m+- y++ v 'c w e p.H WLCA Nobs bom UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ea& $'-rc r$ y n - o Common Name o n c -m n n m g - a Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genoa,aPedw) a' m rno w c - 'm c a ^ r u Spring2 5Survey miaSggme qa .Faw g YppFc W ns U1 Evdi L cs�o ft ._ ONWARD dE �'E$_- .e 2 2 2 2 2 2 n da'=go as ide �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + aHmm n8 a''c a4 uO�E+ 602 13.7 7.7 21,4 west retlwootl Sequoia sempaMrens 40/8 40MO 35%poor SRC X 30%overall contlition"poor'. 603 X 17.3 17.3 west retlwood Sequoia sejNov#.s SONS 25/25 25%Very very poor X 25%overell contlNbn"very Poor Poo.. 604 X 16.7 16.7 west retlwood Sequoia sejNov#.s SO12 25/25 25%Very very poor w X 25%—mil contlXlnn"very Poor Poo.. 605 X 6.6 6.6 west rW Sequoia sempervlrons 3W 25/25 25%very very poor X 0%(Deatl) Poor Me X 26.4 26.4 west retlwoo4 Sequoia sejNov#.s 60/1a 2000 25%very 'C'='i'rk" 25%overall contlition"very Poor poor X ai bm fork a<20 Pam„ feH. 607 X 15.4 15.4 west retlwood Sequoia sejNov#.s 55/10 15/20 17%very 15%—mil contlXlnn"very Poor very poor X Pam„ Me X 22.4 22.4 west retlwood Sequoia..VNoo)rens 60/14 30MO 30%poor poor w X 27%—mil-.dki.n"very Poor" Go 27.1 27.1 westr ood Segoola..VNoo)rens 70NS 35/35 35%poor poor X 3D%overall contlition"poor'. 610 X 13.0 13.0 wst retlwootl Sequoia sempaMrons 90/8 40/20 28%Vary poor to rood X 25%oveall contlition"very Poor Poo.. 75/6 overall cootlNw"goo,". Tree was severely prunetl by pr+perly owner to the west, w trunk of whicM1 removetlalldMe 611 39.4 39A westr ood Segooia aemPand.- 75N5 70170 70%good good X Cankere BfeeL estwartl(acing scaRoltl limbs. wHealtM1 antl--I ratings ar significantly retlucetl below Me cwditiw rating ndetl above. 0%(Dead)Tree was severely prunetl by Property owner to the west,which removetl all of X 8.0 8.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 2514 010 0%d.d d.d X the west d facing s,offdd Iimbs. REMOVED AS OF OCTOBER 2010. Tree w.. erely pruned by pr+perly owner[o the west, 613 28.5 26.5 oast redwood Sequoia sempervirena 75110 75175 75%good good X 1hicih removetl all dine antl facing_Id Id limbs. wHealth antl sWC I ratings n.significantly retlucetl 48 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA S _ C oc c m E m E'c f Y e x' Scientific Nema ym m c p.y WLCA Notae from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon rc r c - m Common Name $ o n_ - c n m g - a Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 x E y a $a c c c c c c _m" m m m (Genes,ap.m.) a' m mow c A c - c a ^ u Spring-5 Survey a Aa, mi0 $§$ a a+ .a ie gm as qa .Faw mp SE'w c&�o fr ._ ONWARD 2 dEE$d= e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ua 6Z'E .a n 2 0'2 UOo 3g uf �' It ¢cgawn al �'c.A uO�Ex Tree wasrseverelY Prunetl by Property owner[o the west, 616 32.3 32.3 west retlwootl Sequoia.—Pm .- 65f15 7010 70%gootl motl to 9ootl X which.—d all of the westwartl facing scagoltl Ilmbs. Health antl structural ra[Ings ow slgnlgcantly md...E n pwr. Tree ¢rely prunetl by property owner[o the west, 615 15.4 15.4 west retlwootl Sequel..—Pm .- SY10 SUM 60%fair pwr X which—.d.11of Ms wes[wartl facing scagoltl Ilmbs. earth and structural ra[Ings w signi—tiyretlucatl n poo r v rely Prunetl by property owner to the west, 616 24.4 24.4 west retlwootl Sequel..—Pm .- 65M 5ww 53%fair rr tl X which removed all of Ms westwartl facing scagoltl Ilmbs. Health antl structural ratings ow slgnlgcantly retlucatl n poor. Tree ¢rely Prunetl by Property owner[o the west, 617 10.1 10.1 west retlwootl Sequoia srrmpeMrens 25/8 6545 55%fair rr tl X which removetl all of , westwartl(.clog scagoltl Ilmbs. Health antl structural ratings ow slgnlgcantly retlucatl Tree ¢rely Prunetlrby Property owner to the west, 618 26.7 26.7 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervirens 70f18 55160 58%fair pwrto rr tl X which removetl all of Me westward(.clog scagoltl Ilmbs. Health antl structural ratings ow slgnlgcantly retlucatl n poor. Tree ¢rely Prunetl by Property owner to the west, 619 12.5 12.5 west retlwootl Sequoia sempeMrons /5/10 5wa %%fair motlerete X which removetl all of , westwartl(.clog scagoltl Ilmbs. Health antl structural ratings ow slgnlgcantly retlucatl n poor. Tree ¢rely Prunetl by Property owner to the west, 6. 15.3 15.3 west retlwootl Sequoia.—Pm .- 35f10 sea %%fair motlerete X which removetl all of Me westwartl(.clog scagoltl Ilmbs. Health antl structural retings ow slgnlgcantly retlucatl Tree ¢rely Prunetlrby Property owner to the west, 621 12.6 12.6 west retlwootl Sequoia snmpe —. /5/11 60f50 55%fair motlerete X which removetl all of , weatwartl(.clog scagoltl Ilmbs. Health antl structural ratings ow slgnlgcantly retlucatl 6. 23.4 23.0 oast retlwootl Sequo/a sempeMrens ]Sf15 SUM SO%fair pwr X 55%overell...d.on'Yair'. 623 25.1 25.1 west retlwootl Sequoia serape .- TS/15 SUM W%fair pwr X 57%overall contlition 6. 15.9 15.9 west retlwootl Sequoia serape .- T0f12 SW40 0%pwr pwr X "%overall contlition"fair'. 625 19.7 6.4 26.1 west retlwootl Sequoia.—Pm .- 65f10 SUM %%fair pwr X 50%overall contlition 626 19.6 19.6 west retlwootl Sequoia..Wp rens 60f10 60f50 55%fair pwr to mW X 50%overall contlition"fair'. 49 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA If S + E o E c f z a x' Scisntif Name L $ a i 2 m+- y++ v 'c w e t'.H WLCA Nobs from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ea& $'-rc r$ y n - o Common Name o n c -m n n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 201] y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genoa,aPeci- a' m mow c - 'm c a�^ r u� Spnnq-5 Survey +0�? iF x x x i x x mia v�`mIt?c �a Sggme qpa .Few g YppFc W ns U1 EvL cs�o ft ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n da'=go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i +'2 & H121 a 0.8 ¢''c.A uO�Ea 62] 22.9 22.9 west retlwootl Segrrola sempeMrens TS/12 60/50 W%Pair Poor X 60%Overa11 contlition"fair". X 14.1 14.1 oast retlwootl S la sem Irens 4510 20I30 re[ammentl tree be r 2Gl8 ague pery 2 terry very lwor X a this time.October 2018 (WLCAI.SHPCO will remove. X 11.9 11.9 oast retlwootl Sequoia sojoovim- 45l7 10110 10%very 0%(Deatl).TREE REMOVED AS Poor very Poor X OF OCTOBER 2018. 630 X 12.0 12.0 west retlwootl S"wla semperv)rens 35MI) 3505 35%Poor Poor X 25%oveall condltioo"very Pao.. 631 X 16.2 16.2 west retlwootl Segoola sempeMrens 4SMS 2(Qt) 20%wry very Poor 25 X 20%overell-.dkbn"very Poor Pea.. 632 15.5 15.5 west retlwootl S"wla sempoof.- 50/18 40/30 35%Poor Poor to mW 30 X 30%overall contlition"poor'. 20%overall contlition"very X 9.9 oast retlwootl Sequoia semoovims -10 35135 35%poor POOr'.TREE REMOVED AS OF OCTOBER 2018. 634 X 11.5 11.5 west retlwootl S"wla semperv)rons 50/12 20/20 20%very 10%averell-.dkbn"very Poor very Poor X Pam„ 635 X 18.4 18A west retlwootl S"wla semperv)rons 50/12 10110 10%very very Poor X 0%(-d) Poor 636 X 20.9 20.9 west retlwootl S"wla semperv)rons 70f18 25f25 25%very 1a%-,.It cwdMw("n, Poor very Pwr X Poor) 637 X 13.8 13.8 west retlwootl S"wla..wo,,lrons 50/15 25f25 25%very On. atwa Poor very Poor X m tams was 5°h overall cwtliaw(very poor). wed at grade. 638 27.9 27.9 west retlwootl S"wla sempervlrons 8=5 7SP]5 75%9ootl mW to 9ootl x 68%overa11 cwdNw(fain. 639 X 10.8 10.8 west retlwootl S"wla sempervlrons Wit 25f25 25%very DNacult to asseu 18%averell co.dk ion"very Poor very Pwr X visually. Pear". 50 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Name L $ o i 2 m+- y++ v 'c w c t'.H WLCA Ngba from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon a& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - a dSi Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 x Ey a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genoa,Pm-, a' m rao w c - 'm c a ^ r u Spring-5 Survey mia v�`m ?c �a Sggme qpa .Faw g YppFc W ns U� EvL cs�o ft ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + ¢¢qaw+ 0.8 ¢''c.A uO�E+ 640 21.1 21.1 oeat mtlwootl Saquola sempeMrens 7W12 40/40 40%Poor Poor W X 30%overall contlition"poor'. 641 19.6 19.6 —.tretlwootl Sequoia serape .- 60/12 Was 60%fair motlerate N X 45%overall contlition"poor'. 642 30.3 30.3 wwat retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 7S/20 SUM 50%fair motlerab X 42%overall contlition"poor'. 643 24.3 24.3 wuatrWwootl Sequoia serape .- 70/18 60/SS 56%fair motlerab X 50%overall contlition"fair". 644 11.1 11.1 coast retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 55/12 SUM 50%fair Poor X 40%overall contlition"poor". 25%overa11 condition"very "a 22.8 22.8 worst rWwootl Sequoia..Wp rens 70/12 40/35 39%Poor Poor X poor".Tree regwuirea a Root Crown Excavation(RCX(. 646 X 14.8 7.5 22.3 worst rWwootl Sequoia sempeMrens S0/10 45/20 2M-rY W X S4runk form at 24%ovamll-.dkbn"vary poor Poor certain Xe g9 . Poor". 647 31.5 31.5 worst rWwootl Sequoia..Wp rens 73/25 am 80%9ootl 9ootl X 70%overall contlition"gootl". 648 X 4.9 4.9 worst rWwootl Sequoia..Wp rens 25/S 30/30 30%poor poor S X 17%overall contlition"very Poo.. 649 25.7 25.7 roust rWwootl Sequoia..Wp rens 6S/12 SUM am fair motlerab X 50%overall contlition 6S0 22.4 22A roust rWwootl Sequoia sempeMrens 65/16 SUM am fair motlerab X 50%overall contlition"fair". 651 29.6 29.6 roust rWwootl Sequoia..Wp rens 70/20 60/40 55%fair motl0raw X 67%overall contlition"fair". 652 15.9 15.9 roust rWwootl Sequoia..Wp rens 65/16 40/40 40%poor poor X 45%overall contlition"poor'. 51 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Name L $ o i 2 m+- y++ v 'c w c p.H WLCA Npba from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ee& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - a Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genoa,aPeuea) a' m rao w c - 'm c a ^ >, u Spnnq-5 Survey miaSggme qpaYppFc W ns U� Evdi L cs�o ft ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + 0.8 ¢''c.A uO�E+ 653 X 16.0 16.0 wwet retlwootl Sequoia.—Pp mna 60/10 20/20 20%wry very poor X 0%(Deatl) Poor GM X 20.5 20.5 wwet retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 55/6 90/15 20%very X 16%overall contlNbn"very Poor very poor Poor". 655 25.0 10.0 35.0 wwet retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 70/15 SUN 50%fair poortomotl 3 X 56%overall contlition 6S6 27.3 27.3 wuet retlwootl Sequoia..Wp mna 75f15 60/40 50%fair poortomotl 6 X 56%.-.11 contlition"fair". 657 19.8 19.8 wuet retlwootl Sequoia..Wp mna 70/15 4545 45%poor poor W X 48%overall contlition"poor'. ON 30.8 30.8 wuetrWwootl Sequoia..Wp mna 70/18 30/35 30%poor poor 4.8 X 45%overall contlition"poor'. 658 X 10.0 10.0 wwet retlwootl Sequoia..Wp mna 35/4 0/0 0%tleatl tleatl X 0%(Deatl) 660 X 23.0 23.0 wwet retlwootl Sequoia..Wp mna 70/15 30/20 25%Very X Strunk form Poor very poor between 60 antl 65 30%overa11 condition"pool'. row okaa8on. 661 X 12.4 12.4 wwet rWwootl Sequoia..Wp mna MS 50f30 35%poor motlerab 20 X 28%overall contlition"very Poo.. 662 17.7 17.7 wwet rWwootl Sequoia...Pe mna 50/15 60/45 50%fair motlerab X 50%overall contlition 669 11.2 11.2 wuet rWwootl Sequoia...Pe mna 50/10 55/50 50%fair poor to mW X 40%overall contlition"poor'. 664 11.0 11.0 wuet rWwootl Sequoia..Wp mna 50/10 SUN 50%fair poor X 40%overall contlition"poor'. 665 20.4 20A wuet rWwootl Sequoia...Pe mna 65f18 60/SS 58%fair .o.mw X 59%overall contlition"fair'. 52 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA updated oeera9 condition a E g tS c N F Z ^ n 6cienti5c Name u $ O n•- o Z i u y.m to a o a q 3 n yp�,oe 2y15 gurvay Ratings&NOTES 2017 Common Name c c — c E E d o g ..5 ONWARD (Genus.species 1 g s g a m e W w W o w "gip R s22m= egg= �c8 a 02 3 St oa of ¢rco°wit a3 X 4S%overall contlition"poop. a" 20.9 Me coast retlwootl Sequoia sempeMmns 70f25 40/60 45%poor poor X 40%overall contlition"pool'. 667 16.7 16.T weal oada-d Sequoia sempeMrans 65f18 40150 45%poor poor X 30%overa11 condition"poor". 668 9.1 9.1 west retlwootl si ywhi sempeMrans wr 30135 35%poor poor This tree has a PG&E guy strap rwnd Ifs trunk wh"h may 10%overall contlition"very oast redwood Sequoia sempeMmns 40l7 3" 30%poor poor X vent.,po irdle Me an X 9.9 9.9 a at tog t .. —tog loss of stability within the stem cross section. 15%overall contlition"very 20%very X Paor'. 670 X 10.7 10.7 oast redwood Segoola...P—rena 4W8 20f20 Poor very pPPr 16%overa11 contlition"very 25%very X Poor'. 671 X 7.1 7.1 oast redwood swooi.samperin— 3W8 25125 Poor very Poor 25%overa11 condition"very X Poor'. 672 X 14.9 14.9 oast redwood spool.sempervimna SW12 M40 40%I aor poor WLCA 1199sata monitoring for X oorMnuM dacline In Ago,. 673 22.2 22.2 Shamal ash F—mosuhdW 5W25 =36 33%paor Poor 2020. WLCA auggs%that we remove X thlstmeforssfalypurposes. 674 142 24.2 Shamal ash F inus uhdW W25 35f40 36%poor poor 2020. 25Ya very Mail X 675 X 15.0 15.0 Shamal ash Fraslnus uhdei SW15 MOPoor vary Poor elevations. Vad X 676 16.6 16.6 Shamal ash F inus no, 65Hg 30f30 30%poor wryPoor eevatona 10%very Mall X X 17.6 AMShamal ash F inus Arnim 65H8 oor iW10 P wrypoor elavationa. X WLCA suggests..-daring e]8 i3A 13A Shamal ash F inus uhdw MIS MW15 45%poor poor m mod E re oval of has in 2020. 53 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA v= E8� d + E+ E c f z a x' Sciantif Nama L $ o f 2 8+- y+ e E H WLCA Notae from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon rc r c y n - + Common Name o n c - n >, n m g �_ Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 x E N r n c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genoa,aPeuea) a: m mo w c - c a ^ u Spring-5 Survey +u � iF x x x i x x mia vm ?c4 �a Sggme qpa .Few g Ypc _ ns U� OL cE�a ft ._ ONWARD dEEo = E' 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'E 6o3 go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ 02 ¢cq a°wn n8 TaaS 8 Ex Removetl in January 2019 tlue t.requirement to move PGE .7 Shamel ash Faxlnus uhtlel M1igM1 voltage untlergrountl vault antl associ—d conduit toward this tree. 680 15.6 15.6 SM1amel asM1 Fraxlnus uhtlel 60/25 50/05 40%poor poorto motl E X WLCA suggests consitlering removal of tree In 2020. 681 17.0 17.0 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 65/25 45/45 45%poor mW..w E X 682 14.2 14.2 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhtlel 50/25 45MO 35%poor poortomotl E 9 X h Possible 683 X 18.7 18.7 Shamel,h F araxlnus utlel 65/00 25/10 15%very tlesUblllzetl root P.., very Poor E E 5 to 6 X plate.High risk tree. Remove. ved antl stumps grountl tlown,as of January,2021,per permit,to allow for new utility 15Y very nching to be tighlinetl 684 X X 12.2 12.2 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 50/20 1— Poor very poor X against the rwd curb in a north outM1 orientation,thereby voitling severe root loss to the inning retlwootls at property line. Removetl antl slumps grountl down,as of January,2021,per permit ro allow for new utility 15%very trenching to be tighlinetl 685 X X 10.5 10.5 Shamel ash Fraxinua uhtlel 45I20 MIpoor vary Poor E E X against the road curb in a north- oulh orientation,tM1ereby voitling severe root loss[o iM1e malning retlwootls at properly line. Removetl antl stumps grountl tlown,as of January,2021,per permit,W allow for new utility nching W be tighlinetl 686 X 6.0 4.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervirens 1516 50150 50%fair matlerate X against the rwd curb in a north ou.orientation,thereby voiding severe root loss to the aming retlwootls at property line. Removetl antl slumps ground tlown,as of January,2021,per permit U,allow for new utility trenching to be tighlinetl 687 X 11.4 11.4 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 45125 40/05 87%poor poor[o motl E E X against the road curb in a noriM1- outh orientation,tM1ereby voiding severe root loss to- aming redwoods at property line. Removetl antl slumps grountl tlown,as of January,2021,per permit,to allow far new utility nching to be tighlinetl fi80 X 4.5 4.5 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervirens 2- 70170 70%gootl matlerate X ag.in.t the—d curb in a north ping orientation,tM1ereby —id severe root loss to the aming retlwootls al properly line. 54 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA _ E oc Zc + E o E c f z a x' Sci.ntif Name L $ o f 2 8+- y++ v 'c w e E H WLCA Notes from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon p r c y n - o Common Name o n c - n `o n tti m g - a Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 x E N r n c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genoa,aPmr-) a: m mow c - c a ^ u Spring-5 Survey +u � iF x x x i x x mia v�`.I."! �a Sggme qa .Faw g Ypc 'Hoo ns U� EE� c��o ft ._ ONWARD dEEo = E' 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'E�o3 go as ide �2.� nQ 2$ 02 WE & ufE '+ ¢cR o°wn a8 ¢''c.A uO�Ex ved antl stumps grountl tlown,as of January 2021,per permit,to allow for new utility 10%very nching to be tighlinetl 688 .9 Shamel ash Fraxinus uM1tlei fi5/20 10/10 Poor very poor E E X against the—d curb in a north outh orientation,thereby voiding severe root loss to the aming retlwootls at property line. Removetl and stumps grountl down,as of January,2021,per permit,to allow for new utility trenching to be ti9hlined •9 4.9 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervirens 1816 ]OI]0 ]0%gootl motlerete X against the road curb In a north south orientation,thereby avoltling severe root loss to Me malning redwoods a[properly Ilne. Removetl antl stumps grountl tlown,as of January,2021,per permit to allow for new utlllty 15%very trenching to be tighlinetl 691 X X Me 10.8 Shamel ash Fraxinus uM1tlei 35I25 15111 poor very poor E X X against the rood curb Ina north south orientation,thereby avoltling severe root loss to the malning redwoods al property Ilne. Removetl antl stumps grountl down,as of January,2021,per permit,to allow for new utility nching to be tighlinetl 692 X 22.5 22.5 Shamel ash Fraxinus uM1tlei 75135 1 150 58%fair motl to gootl E E X against the rwd curb in a north oath orientation,thereby voiding severe root loss to the aming retlwootls at property line. Removetl antl stumps ground down,..of January,2021,par pefmit,to allow for new utlliy trenching to be tighlinetl 693 X 28.0 MO Shamel ash Fraxinus uM1tlei 7.1l) 65/50 5T%fair motl to gootl E E 9 X against the—d curb In a north south or—ton,thereby avoiding severe root loss to Me malning redwoods al property line. Removetl antl stumps grountl down,as of January,2021,per permit,to allow for new utility trenching to be ti9hlined a" X 21.3 21.3 Shamel ash Fraxinus uM1tlei 70I35 4 40 40%poor poor 18 X against the road curb in a north ouch orientation,thereby voiding severe root loss to the malning redwoods at property tin.. Removetl antl slumps ground down, as of January,2021,per permit,to allow for new utility Roofs--d with trenching W be tighlinetl 695 X 28.3 28.3 Shamel ash Fraxinus uh- 70135 .-So SS%fair matlerate E E X tlecay,on west sitle against the rwd curb in a north o(raot system. oath orientation,thereby voitling severe root loss to the aming retlwootls at property line. Removetl antl slump.grountl tlown,as of January,2021,- .it,to allow for new utility nching to be tighlinetl 6S6 X 23.9 23.9 Shamel ash Fraxinus uM1tlei ]5130 SwSo 50%fair poor[o motl E X agains[the road curb in a north ouM orientation,thereby voitling severe root loss to the aming redw++tls al properly line. 55 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E o E c f z a x' S.w.t Nam. L $ o f 2 8+- y++ v 'c w e E H WLCA Nob.from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon Ea& $'-rc r c y n - + Common Name o n c - n r n m g �_ Ratings&NOTES 2017 N r n c c c c c c _m„ .w.c (Genoa,aPeuea) a: m et o w c - c a ^ u SPdng 2p15 Survey +u E iF t x mia v�`m�?c4 �a Sggme qa .Few g Ypc _ ns U� OL cs�o fr ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n di'Eo3 go as Hs n2.� ¢cg A°wn a8 ¢m'c.A uO�Ex .3 Shamel ash Fraxinus uM1tlei 75130 7�35 �% 7..dE R.-d.nd stumps g...nd down,as of January,2021,per permit,to allow for new utlllry trenching to be tlghllnetl 0.2 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 28I10 55/80 55%fair poor to m d % agal-the r d curb Ina n sou"'od. bn,th. avoltling sa malning in X X 8.4 8.4 oast retlwootl Spuoia aempervimna 28H0 0/0 0%dead d.d X 0%(-d).REMOVED AS OF OCTOBER.,2018. ]00 X X 7.5 7.5 oast retlwootl sequoia sempervlrena 2&10 wo 0%d.d d.d X 0%(-d).REMOVED AS OF OCTOBER.,2018. X X 8.2 8.2 oast retlwootl sequoia aempervlrena 2517 40/40 40%poor poor X 0%(-d).REMOVED AS OF OCTOBER.,2018. % X 1 8.1 oast retlwootl sequoia sempervirens 2517 1wI0 1%-" vary poor X 0%(-d).REMOVED AS OF OCTOBER.,2018. 703 X 20.3 20.3 oast retlwootl Se-m serape - M20 40/40 40%poor poor to motl X 50%overell contlltlon"fair". 704 X 11.3 11.3 oast retlwootl Segrmia aemp.rvirena 3W8 wo 0%dead d.d X 0%(D..d). 4%overall contlltlon"very X 10.3 oast retlwootl sequoia sempervlrena 3014 515 5%very poor very poor poor".REMOVED AS OF OCTOBER,2018. 10 very 13%overall oondM-"wry 7. X 11.0 11.0 oast retlwootl Segrmia aemp.rvirena 3W8 10/10 poor very poor 1 X poor".WLCA su99es4 removal n 2020. 10%very 7%ovemll contlltlon"very ]0] % 5.8 5.8 oast retlwootl Sprroia aempervirena 25/8 10/10 poor very poor X poor".WLCA suggests removal n 2020. 15Y.overall oondM-"wry ]O8 % 11.5 11.5 oast retlwootl Segrmia-P.rvirens 30/8 40/40 4o%poor poor X poor".WLCAsuggests removal In 2020. 56 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c Scisntif NamO L $ o i 2 m+- y++ v 'c m c P.H WLCA Npba bpm UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon Name o n c - n >, w w g �_ Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 x E N r n c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genoa,aPeuea) a' m ra o w c - c a ^ m u SPring 2p15 Survey o qun� iF x x x i x x mia `m r?c4 a Sgg�e Wpp Fa°w g Yc - nY U� ow ccm ONWARD J. 2 2 2 2 E iZ'o ide �d �L� n@ 25 02 ¢cq o°wLL o.,a �'cS uO�Ex' TREE REMOVED FROM LANDSCAPE. 710 12.3 12.3 west rOtlwootl Sequoia serape .- 35/S 40/40 40%poor X 35%overall condition"poor'. 711 X 11.3 11.3 west rOtlwootl Sequoia serape m- 40/4 10/10 10 .rr X 0%(Deatl).WLCAsu99ests Poor very poor removal 2020. 712 8.4 8.4 west rOtlwootl Sequoia serape m- WS 30/30 30%pwr poor X 36%overall contlition"poor". 713 11.4 11.4 west rOtlwwtl Sequel.serape m- 35/6 40/40 40%pwr poor X 40%overall condition"poor'. 714 X 7.3 7.3 west rOtlwwtl Sequoia serape m- 30/6 MIS 15%very POTENTIAL REMOVAL PER oo Pr very poor X WLCA 715 19.5 19.5 west rOtlwwtl Sequoia sempeMm- 50/15 45/45 45%pwr poor X 35%overall condition"poor'. 716 X 4.3 4.3 oastredwood Se quo la sempeMrens 1715 0/0 9%tleatl d.d X POTENTIAL REMOVAL PER WLCA. mow- 717 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 3917 20I20 20%very very poor —d by SHPCO In 20 Poor DEAD. 718 7.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 2914 OIO 0%tleatl tleatl X movetl by SHPCO In 2017, DEAD. 719 11.4 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 40115 .10 0%tleatl tleatl X movetlby SHP00In2017, DEAD. 720 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 5017 OIO 0%tleatl tleatl move I by shpco 2019 tlue to tleath ottree. A own_ 721 X 15.3 15.3 west retlwootl Sequoia sempeMrons 50/12 M. 10%very POTENTAL REMOVAL PER Poor very Pr X WLCA 57 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E o E c f z a x' Sckntif Neme L $ o f 2 m+- y++ v 'c w e F!H WLCA Notae from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ee& $'-rc r$ y n - o Common Name o n c -m n n m g - a Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genoa,aPeclea) a' m ra o w c - 'm c a�^ r u� Spring 2015 Survey +0�? iF x x x i x x mia v�`mIt?c �a Sggme qpa .Few g YppFc W ns U� EvL cs�o ft ._ ONWARD dE �'E$_- .e 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + aHmm n8 a''c iA uO�E+ ]22 X 11.5 11.5 west retlwootl Sequoia ti—poMrens S0/10 20/20 20%vary very poor X POTENTAL REMOVAL PER Poor WLCA 40%overall condition"poor". Monterey pine Plnus ratllafa -2. 50140 48%poor matlerakj Being removetl December 2018 for trenching PG&E electrical. 1. X 13.8 13.8 oast redwood Sequola sempomm" 50/9 MIS 15%very POTENTIAL REMOVAL PER poor very poor X WLCA Tree removetl as of 2014 by SHPCO tlue to property owner X 22.0 22.0 Manterey pine Plnus ratllafa 55/25 35/40 38%poor poor X request in order to a top e(IeMr ham dr ing into his swimming pool. Tree removetl as of 2014 by SHPC X 20.9 20.8 Manterey pine PI.-ratllafa S0/25 30/25 28%vary SE SE X to tlue to property owner Poor very poor westrequestinantlertatop ka(litter ham ping into his swimminging pool. 72T X 13.5 13.5 oast retlwootl Sequola sempenArens —2 40/25 30%Pool poor X 15%overall condition"very poor'. oast retlwootl Sequola sempervlrens -10 10I15 —d by SHPCO In 201 DEAD. T28 8.0 8.0 west retlwootl Sequola semP ovi.- 4005 Gain 0%poo m overa r rood—te X 35% ll condition"poor'. 730 14.0 14.0 west retlwootl Sequola semPovi.- Sell Select Mfair mod—te X DNBcult to assess 0%overall contlition"poor". visually. 731 X X 14.7 14.7 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel SW25 25/25 25%very very poor E E X poor by sill-between 2017 eitber due to tree 24.3 24.3 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel W25 25%Very E OR T X tleaM or tlue to property owner Poor very poor to west requesting removal to stop leaf litter falling into swimming pool. Removetl by SHP-between 2014 and 2017 either due to tree Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 5w 0 40135 38%poor d-tb or tlue to property owner to west requesting removal to It 0 stop kaf litter falling Into Circling roots. MC sugges4 monitoring for T34 17.1 17.1 SM1amel esM1 Fraxlnus uhtlN 45/30 93/35 3S%poor poor X RooLS Eamagetl on tlecllnea dW lnatabllXy.2020. grade. 58 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA Ea o'8'Y 8 °rY �a E a _ ;- r=• o. ^' common Name ScientRc Name FS °gg's g8o o W3 oy UpdatedOCondition Condition WLCA Noaeu Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 2 iae �d �ZG° ]33 X tT.5 17.5 Shamel ash Fraxinus uhtlel 55/25 20120 20%wry (car very poor E l foot poor Imo ) X WLOA suggests monitoring for decline andlor InstabllXy.2020. 778 X 19.1 19.1 Shamelaeh Fraxinus uhtlel 45135 25/25 26%vary Poor very PPPr alv.d-s. % WLCa suggests monitwing for decline.Potential removal tree. 737 20.7 20.7 Shamel ash Faxlnus uhtlel 55/30 90/90 95%poor poor E 20 X Roots severed and WLCa suggests monitoring for tlamagetl on grdtle. decline.Potential removal tree. 730 21.7 21.7 Shamelaeh Fraxlnus uhtlel 50/30 4040 40%poor poor S OR X VVI.Calln..P Bests monito I for decline.PMan[lal removal tree. 730 X 23.1 23.7 Shamel aah Fraxinus uhtlel 65/30 25/25 25%wry m WLCa suggests on8oring for Poor very poor E X dacline or instability.Potential removal tree. TW 26.0 26.0 Shamel ash Faxinus uhtlel 45/35 65/50 56Ya{air gootl X OR X X Tqi 24.5 24.5 Sit amel ash Fraxinus uhtlel 50/30 I0/40 IOVo poor poor X X X 792 27.2 27.2 Sit amel ash Fraxinus uhtlel 50/30 50/90 48%poor motlemte Various eNvaOms X X 70 30.1 30.1 Shamelaeh F has uhtlel 50]g0 60/45 50%lair motlemte X X TM X 252 252 Sit amel ash Fraxinus uhtlel 35/30 50/40 4S%poor motlemte X X X Rook pruned near malnstem. 70 X 14.2 142 Shamel ash Fraxlrws uhtlel 30/20 35/30 35%poor poor X g X X 70 24.1 Shamel ash Fraxinus uhtlel SOI25 60/50 55%Lair motlerate E X X 747 18.6 18.6 Shamelaeh Fraxinus uhtlel 60/LS 60/30 38%poor matt—fa E various � eNvatlons X 59 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' Sciantif Name L $ o i 2 9+- y++ v 'c w c t'.H WLCA N+tac from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon v& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m o. n m g -dSi Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 x Ey a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genoa,Pm-, a: m mo w c - 'm c a ^ r u Spnnq-5 Survey mia v�`m ?c �a Sggme qpa .Faw g YppFc W ns U� EvL cs�o fr ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i +'2 & H121 + ¢¢kaw+ 0.8 ¢''c.A uO�E+ OR 746 21.7 21.7 Shamelash Faxlnus uhtlel SW30 SW45 49%Poor mw.n,W E X wntl8ion. 749 16.0 16.0 Shamelash Fraxlnus uh&I SW20 30/30 30%Poor Poor E X X 750 17.3 17.3 Shamelash Fraxlnus uh&I SW25 40/40 40%Poor Poor E X 751 15.8 15.8 Shamelash Fraxlnus uh&I SW25 25/25 26%vary Poor E E X Circling Poor 752 18.5 18.5 Shamel a,h Fraxlnus uh&I SW30 SW45 50%hir motlemt. E E 8 X 753 19.8 19.8 Shamelash Fraxlnus uh&I SW30 SW45 49%Poor Poor E E X 754 21.8 21.8 Shamelash Fraxlnus uh&I 65/25 55/40 0%Poor motlemw E E X OR X 755 20.1 20.1 Shamelash Fraxlnus uh&I SW25 60/50 SS%hir motlemte E X 756 18.1 18.1 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uh&I 60/30 SW45 49%Poor Poor W motl E E OR 6 X 7W 16.8 16.8 Shamelash Fraxlnus uh&I 60/25 40/40 40%Poor Poor 8 X 758 X 19.3 19.3 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uh&I SW30 25/25 25%Very very Poor E E X Poor 759 18.2 18.2 Shamelash Fraxlnus uh&I 60/30 35/35 35%P r Poor E E X 760 20.8 20.8 Shamelash Fraxlnus uh&I 60/35 40/30 35%P r Poor E E X 60 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA Ea o'p'Y 8 °rY �° E a _ ;- r=• o. a2 ;2° � a—an`d oc° Ca•a 24^' (GSceinustR,sP Neciea) a°' Sej _E'ppp Fa�S`_we °gg'cs g8 a 3W WLCh No from» UPtletlOCotlXlo? Png 053urvRaings 8 NOTES 2017 2 ONWARD ]61 t5A 15.4 Shamel ash Fraxinus uhtlel Set" VOW 40%poor mw.nft E E 8 X TV 17.1 17.1 Shamelaeh Fraxlnus uhtlel SW35 95/35 95%poor OR % 763 X 23.5 23.5 Shamelaeh Fraxlnus uhtlel 6505 15/15 15%vary Pwr wry poor E 8 X 764 X 13.6 13.6 Shamelaeh Fraxlnus uhtlel 50120 10%vary 10/10 wry pwr E Poor X 765 16.0 16.0 Shamel ach Fraxlnus uhtlel SO125 30/30 30%pwr pwr E E X 766 18.5 18.5 Shamel aah Fraxlnus uhtlel Set" 4040 40%poor poor E E OR X 767 18.8 18.8 Shamel aah Fraxlnus uhtlel 60/30 95/45 /O%poor pwr E E X 768 X 14.5 14.5 Shamel aah Fraxlnus uhtlel 6g/30 2M 20%wry Poor very Poor E E X R—tlamagetl on gratle. 70 218 23.8 Shamelaeh Frulnus uhtlel 65/35 SW35 40%poor motlemre E E serious girtlling ig X root ]]0 16.3 16.3 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 35/25 90/3O 90%pwr pwr E 10 X TTi X 16.1 16A Shamel ash Fraxlrws uhtlel 55/30 6005 55%fair motlemie E X 772 33.6 33.6 west ratlwootl Sp-la--Pp rens 75I20 TWO TO%gwtl motlerate X 75%owmll cweiew••ewe•. TT3 16.4 16A west ratlwootl S pwla sempeMrens 61V19 60/60 6D%fair matlerefe X M%owrell cwtli8w"fair' 61 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Neme L $ o i 2 m+- y++ v 'c w c p.H WLCA Notae from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ee& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - a Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genus,Pm- a' m rao w c - 'm c a ^ >, u Spring-5 Survey miaSggme qpaYppFc W ns U1 Evdi L cs�o ft ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n da'=go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i +'2 & H121 + ¢¢qaw+ 0.8 ¢''c.A uO�E+ ]74 18.5 18.5 west retlwootl Segrrola semPe7.- 60/15 75/60 67%fair motlerate X 60%overa11 cwtliew"Nie' 775 10.7 10.7 west retlwootl S"wla serape .- 30/6 60/50 55%fair motlerab X 40%overa11 cwtliew"Pw 776 34.2 34.2 west retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 75/25 7010 70%9ootl motlerab X 75%overa11 cwtli0w"gootl". 777 X 7.8 7.8 west retlwootl S"wla..W-Irons 25/6 SW35 40%pwr motleraw W W X 20%overall contlition"very P1. 778 28.8 28.8 west retlwootl S"wla..W-Irons 75/25 7010 70%9ootl motlerab X 75%overa11 cwtlNw"gwtl". 778 16.8 16.8 west retlwootl S"wla serape .- 50/13 65/55 60%fair motlerab X 75%overall cwtliew"gwtl". 780 X 7.0 7.0 west retlwootl S"wla..Wp rons 35/6 SW35 45%poor motlerab X 28%overa11 contlXbn"very P1. 781 21.6 21.6 west retlwootl S"wla..Wp rons 63/15 60/40 47%pwr motlerate 1s X 30%overall contlition"poor. 782 32.1 32.1 west retlwootl S"wla..Wp rons MN 7010 70%9ootl motlerate X 75%overa11 cwtli0w"gwtl". 783 26.0 26.0 west retlwootl S"wla..W-Irons 85/20 7010 70%9ootl motlerate X 7g%overall contlition"gootl. 784 16.1 16.1 west retlwootl S"wla..W-Irons 75/15 70/65 70%gootl motlerate X 50%overa11 cwtliew"fait' 785 21.8 21.8 west retlwootl S"wla serape ... 73/15 7010 7o%go motlereb x 60%ovara11 c dKi-"We' 786 X 13.0 13.0 west retlwootl Sequoia sempeMrons 50/8 SW35 40%p r poor W X 25%ovemll wntlXlon"very pw.. 62 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif NemO L $ o i 2 m+- y++ v 'c w c P.H WLCA NotOe from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon a& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g -dSi Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 x Ey a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genus,Pm-, a' m mow c - 'm c a ^ r u Spring-5 Survey mia v�`m ?c �a Sggme qpa .Few g YppFc W ns U� EvL cs�o ft ._ ONWARD IS 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i +'2 & H121 + ¢¢kaw+ 0.8 ¢''c.A uO�Eo 787 X 17.8 17.8 west rOtlwootl S"-I..—Pe .- 65/10 Goon 40%poor poor W X 25%ovem11-.ditIon"very Pwr". 788 20.1 20.1 west rOtlwootl S"wla.—Pe .- 90/15 60/60 60%fair pwrto motl X 50X ovOrall cwtlNw"fair' 789 23.4 23.4 west rOtlwootl S"wla semPa7t4mns 80/15 75170 73%9ootl motlerab E X 70%overall contlition"gootl. 790 19.5 19.5 west rOtlwootl S"wla..Wp mns 80/18 75P75 75%9ootl motlerate X 60%overall cwdi8w'fait' 791 17.1 15.1 32.2 west rOtlwootl S"wla..Wp mns 70/20 70/60 65%fair 2 X 65%overall contlition"fair". 792 28.2 28.2 west rOtlwootl S"wla..Wp mns 90/20 70170 70%9ootl motlerate X 70%overall contlition"gootl. 793 21.9 21.9 west rOtlwootl Segrrola serape .- 70/15 65/60 62%fair motlerab X 58%overall contlition 794 X 22.0 22.0 west rOtlwootl S"wla semPe .- 50/15 Sato 47%pwr motlerate 0 to 2 X _iwl stem sP,_t 27%overall contlition"very poor. 795 24.0 24.0 west rOtlwootl Segrrola serape .- 85/20 70170 70%9ootl motlerate X 76%overall contlition"gootl. 7% 45.5 0.5 west rOtlwootl S"-I..Wp mns 90/30 7W5 75%9ootl gootl X 78%overa11 cwdi8w"gwtl". 787 14.8 14.8 west rOtlwootl S"-I..Wp mns 50/8 50/40 47%pwr motlerate X Supressetl in shatle 35%overall contlition"poor'. 798 12.6 12.6 west retlwootl S"-I sempeMmns 60/12 60/40 48%pwr pwr E 20 X 25%overall condition"very poor'. 789 22.6 22.6 west rOtlwootl Swlrrola serape .- 80113 70170 70%9ootl motleraw X 65%overall contlition"fair". 63 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z a x' Scientif Name L $ o f 2 m+- y++ v 'c w e C H WLCA Notae hem UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Es& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - a Ratings 8 NOTES 201] y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genus,aPeuea) a' m mow c - 'm c a ^ r u Spring-5 Survey miaSggme qpa .Few g YppFc W ns U1 Evdi L cs�o ft ._ ONWARD dE �'E$_- .e 2 2 2 2 2 2 n da'=go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i +'2 & H121 a aHizw n8 a''c a4 OOZE+ am 21.8 21.8 west retlwootl Sequoia sempInI.- Gana Was 65%fair motlerete X 65%overall contlition"fair". 801 17.3 17.3 west retlwwtl Sequoia semPInI.- SS/8 5wM 50%fair poor W W X 30%overall contlition"poor'. 802 32.S 32.5 west retlwootl Sequoia sempI nI.- 90i25 SUM 50%fair poor X DNBcult to assess 50%overall—inw-W- visually. 803 15.0 15.0 —strWwootl Sequoia sempeMrons 60/8 30i30 30%pwr poor X 30%overall contlition"poor". 20%overa11 condition"very poor".This tree was Illegally p—d In Arn,"2020 or May 2020 by neighbor W west of West Perimeter R-d,who apparently cut wt a largo umber of tleatl Iambs a" X 32A 32A oast retlwootl Segrmla..wend... 9w1a OWN 60%falr pwrto nn tl X eM dhg into their property airspace(see photos In May 15, 20201nspecNw report). MW21 that this tree Is In 10% ¢real condition,Intl Is now "bushing wt"wIth.—twig growth hen the mllnstem. 805 13.0 13.0 west retlwootl Sequoia semPwv/rons ews 4040 40%1—r poor X S4runkform 30%overall contlition"poor'. am 16.8 16.8 west retlwootl Sequoia semPI nf— S0i10 VMS 58%fair matlerete X 40%wwa11c did-"pwr' X 12.1 12.1 oast retlwootl Sequoia sInv IMrens 60i12 Was W%fair pwrto motl X Tree removed October 2018. X 24.5 24.5 oast retlwootl Sequoia sInv IMnIn. 90120 40130 33%poor poor 55 X Tree removed October 2018. a. X 11.0 11.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia semparNrens awls 6w. 55%fair poor tow X 3]%overall contlition(paw) X iS.O 15.0 west retlwootl Sequoia s,nv Iw1— ]Sl8 10N0 10%wry Tree removetl in May/June 2021 810 Pwr very poor X by Vallco team tlue[o tleatl ontlition. 64 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Neme L $ o i 2 m+- y++ v 'c w c p.H WLCA Nobs from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ea& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - a Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genus,aPeuea) a' m rao w c - 'm c a ^ r u Spring-5 Survey miaSggme qpaYppFc W ns U1 Evdi L cs�o ft ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n da'=go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i +'2 & H121 + ¢¢qaw+ 0.8 ¢''c aS uO�E+ 811 X 5.6 5.6 west retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 30/6 40/30 35%pwr poor X 25%ovem11-..loon'very pool'. 812 X 23.2 23.2 west retlwootl Sequoia sempeMrons 80/20 0/0 0%tleatl tleatl X S-trunk form. 0%(Deatl) 813 X 13.3 13.3 west retlwwtl Segrrola sempeMrens 70/16 10/10 10%wry very poor X 7%overall cwtli0w(very p00r) Poor 814 X 24A 24.0 Oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 05120 OIO OX tlaatl tlaatl X Tree removed Oc[eber 2018. 815 X 9.0 9.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 4015 OIO 0%tleatl tleatl X Tree removed October 2018. 816 X 16.5 16.5 west retlwwtl Segrrola..Wp rens 80/12 SUM 50%fair poor X 20%overa11-..loon"very Pool'. 817 X 11.9 11.9 west retlwwtl Sequoia serape .- 35/6 SW40 43%pwr pwr X 15%overo11-.dkbn'very Pool'. 818 25.4 25.4 west retlwwtl Sequoia sempeMrons 80/18 60/60 60%fair motlereb X 60%ovara11 cwtlNw"fail' 819 12.4 12.4 west retlwwtl Segrrola serape .- 55/13 sea 45%pwr pwr X 30%overall-ntliti0n"poor". 820 26.3 26.3 west retlwwtl Segrrola..Wp rens 90/25 55/60 58%fair pwr to rn tl X 70%overall contliti0n"g00tl. 12%overall c0ntliti0n"very VX 4.6 oast retlwootl Sequolasempervlrens 3013 010 peel'.TREE RE MOVED OF OCTOBER 2018. 822 23.4 23.4 west retlwwtl Segrrola serape .- 80/20 SUM 50%fair pwr 18 X 55%o .11 cwtli0w"fail' an 17.9 17.9 west retlwootl Segrrola sempeMrens 100/15 SW35 40%pwr pwr 70 X 90%overo11 cwtli0w"pcal' 65 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E o E c f z a x' Scientif Neme L $ o f 2 m+- y++ v 'c w e p.H WLCA Nobs from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ee& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genus,aPeuea) a' m rao w c - 'm c a ^ r u Spring-5 Survey miaSggme qpa .Faw g YppFc W ns U� Evdi L cs�o ft ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + 0.8 ¢''c.A uO�E+ a. 29.3 29.3 west retlwootl Segrrola serape .- 100t20 4040 40%pwr pwrto motl 25 X 75%overa11 cwdiew"9wtl". 825 X 7.8 7.8 west retlwwtl S"wla serape .- MS 40t20 29%very 18%overall-.dkbN"very Poor poor X P1. 826 11.1 11.1 west retlwootl Sequoia sompe .- 35t12 60tm 50%fair pwrto motl E X Bow form W nk. a%overell cwdisw"pwr' 827 X 10.7 10.7 west retlwwtl Sequoia sompe .- 3St10 ate 0%d.d d.d X Bow form hunk. 0%(Deatl) an 11.7 11.7 west retlwwtl Sequoia.-Pe .- Sets 30t30 3e%pwr pwr 20 X 3e%overall contlition"poor'. an 27.2 27.2 west retlwwtl Segrrola serape .- 95t25 7010 70%9wtl motlereb X 70%overall contlition"gootl. an 15.2 15.2 west retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 40t16 45t30 37%pwr pwrto mW 20 X 35%overall contlition"poor'. 831 11.0 11.0 west retlwootl Sequoia semperv)rens 40ts 3040 37%pwr pwr SW X 3e%overall contlition"poor'. 832 13.0 13.0 westrMwootl Segrrola sempervlrens 45t11 60/SS 59%fair motlereb X 3e%overall contlition"poor". an 26.6 26.6 west retlwootl Segrrola semperv)rens 70t30 70t65 68%fair motlereb 30 X 78%overall contlition"gootl". au X 5.8 5.8 west ratlwootl Segrrola semperv)rens MS 20t20 20%very 6%overall condition"very Poor verypwr SE X P.W. 835 15.8 11.0 26.8 west rWwootl Segrrola sempervlrens 85t18 60tm 55%fair pwrto mW 2 X 0%overall contlition"poor'. ox 9.8 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 3-12 72-25 2 terry ry poor S X Tree removed October 2018. 66 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Neme L $ o i 2 m+- y++ v 'c w c P.H WLCA Npbe from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ea& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 201] y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genus,Pm- a' m rao w c - 'm c a ^ r u Spring-5 Survey midSggme qpaYppFc W ns U� Evdi L cs�o ft ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n da'=go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + ¢¢qaw+ 0.8 ¢''c.A OOZE+ 831 15.2 15.2 west ratlwootl Sequoia serape .- 4S/10 Sato 45%poor poor to motl W NW X 30%overall contlition"poor'. an 23.9 23.9 west ratlwwtl Sequoia sGmpe .- W20 45/45 0%1-r pwr X W%overall cwdfm"fair' 839 26.1 26.1 west ratlwwtl Sequoia sempervlrens 90/25 War, 60%fair motlerab X 70%overall contlition"gootl. 840 X 10.8 9.0 19.8 west ratlwwtl Sequoia semPerv/rens Gate 3SMS 35%pwr pwr 20 X 20%overa11 contlition'very Poo.. Sweep form W nk. 841 21.2 21.2 west ratlwwtl Sequoia sempervlrens 80/13 War, 53%fair pwr to rr tl X Apkal mar'retam 35%overa11 contlition"poor'. appear gwe. 842 27.2 8.5 35.7 west ratlwwtl Sequoia sempervlrens SONS 7010 70%9-1 motlerate X 75%overa11 cwdi0w"gootl'. x 10.8 oast redwood Sequoia sempervirens SSl4 1011a Tree bus been re -d. October 2018. a. 16.4 16.4 west ratlwwtl Sequels sempervlrens 80/20 SORG 50%fair pwr to rr tl X 75%overa11--"g-l'. 845 28.2 28.2 west ratlwwtl Sequels sempervlrens 90/25 7010 70%9-1 motlerate X 30%overall contlition Neigbbom ebeared tree in am X 14.1 14.7 west ratlwwtl Sequoia serape .- 45t6 SW45 48%pwr pwr W motl X October,202a.Expect tree to tlecline over Gme. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST 847 11.5 9.5 21.0 west ratlwwtl Sequoia serape .- 4S/10 50/w 50%fair pwrto motl X SIDE IN OCTOBER,2020. EXPECT TREE DECLINE OVER TIME. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST am 23.9 23.9 west ratlwwtl Sequoia semperv)ren 90/20 50/w 50%fair pwrto motl X SIDE IN OCTOBER,2020. E%PECT TREE DECLINE OVER TIME. NEIGHBORS SHEARED j 849 20.5 20.5 west ratlwwtl Sequoia semPerv)ren 80/18 War, 55%fair pwrto motl X SIDE IN OCTOBER, TIME. 67 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA If Z + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Neme L $ o i 2 m+- y++ v 'c w c P.H WLCA Nptac from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ee& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 201] y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genoa,pm- a: m rao w c - 'm c a ^ r u Spring-5 Survey miaSggme qpaYppFc W ns U� Evdi L cs�o ft ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n da'=go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + A8 ¢''c aS uO�E+ NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST am 18.3 18.3 west retlwootl Sequoia snmPe .- 8W15 OWN 54%fair pwrtomotl E X HIDE IN OCTEDECLINE TIME. PE CT TREE DECLINE OVER TIME. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST 851 24.5 24.5 west retlwwtl Sequel.snmpa .- 95f25 6W5) 60%fair motlerete X Sweep Corm trunk. SIDE IN OCT PE CT TREEE DE OVER LINO. E TIME. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST 20%Wry SIDE IN OCTOBER,2020. Poor as of EXPECT TREE DECLINE OVER 852 X 12.5 6.9 19.4 oast retlwootl Spwia aempervirena 5W18 OWN WWI tlua to pwrto motl 1 X TIME.TREE IS SIGNIFICANTLY ""likgal DECLINING IN OVERALL Pmning CONDITION AS OF 2126121 DUE TO THE OCTOBER,2020 NEIGHBOR PRUNING. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST 10%Very SIDE IN OCTOBER,2020. Poor as 0f EXPECT TREE DECLINE OVER 853 X 11.8 7.8 19.8 oast retlwootl Spwia aempervirena 3W18 MIS V2612021 tlua Wry pwr 2 X TIME.TREE IS SIGNIFICANTLY .illegal DECLINING IN OVERALL pmning in CONDITION AS OF 2126121 DUE 2D2D. TO THE OCTOBER,2020 NEIGHBOR PRUNING. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST %(baskaly SIDE IN OCTOBER,2020. 5 %( EXPECT TREE DECLINE OVER d.a as ll 854 X 18.5 18.5 west retlwwtl Sequoia sempa .- TW18 40f35 212W21 tlua to pwr 30 X DECLINING NOVEIS SIGNIFICANTLY 2020 illegal DECLINING A OVERALL Pmning CONDITION OCTOBER,OF 2126121 DUE TOTHERPRUNI . NEIGHBOR PRUNING. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST SIDE IN OCTOBER,2020. 20%Very 20% EXPECT TREE DECLINE OVER as 4 ass X 15.1 15.1 west retlwwtl Spwia aemp .- MIS OWN 212W21,tlue pwrtomotl X TIME.TREE SIGNIFICANTLY .ilbgal DECLINING NG OVERALL pmning CONDITION AN OF L DUE TO THE OCTOBER, 020 NEIGHBOR PRUNING.. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST Deatl SIDE IN OCTOBER,2020. (0%rating)as EXPECT TREE DECLINE OVER as X 10.1 10.1 west retlwwtl Sequoia sempaMrens 4W8 4W35 o1212fi121, poor X TIME.TREE IS SIGNIFICANTLY tlua[o illegal DECLINING IN OVERALL pmning CONDITION AS OF V26121 DUE TO THE OCTOBER,2020 NEIGHBOR PRUNING. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST SIDE IN OCTOBER, 020. 861 21.1 21.1 oast retlwootl Spwia—Pervlrena 8=5 5610 50%falr poor to motl X EXPECT TREE DECLINE OVER TIME. 68 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z a x' Scientif Neme L $ o f 2 m+- y++ v 'c w e E H WLCA Nptae from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Es& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 201] y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genus,Pm- a' m mo w c - 'm c a ^ r u Spring-5 Survey miaSggme qpaYppFc W ns U� EvL cs�o fr ._ ON 2 2 2 2 2 2 n da'=go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + 0.8 ¢''c.A OOZE+ NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST am 19.5 19.5 west retlwootl Sequoia serape .- W20 War, 55%fair rn tl..te X SIDE IN OCTOBER,2020. EXPECT TREE DECLINE OVER TIME. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST as 9.8 9.8 west retlwootl Sequoia semPe].- 50/1 oo 0 40MS 38%pr poor X Supressetl in-d.SIDE IN OCT LINO. EXPECT TREEE D DEECLINE OVER TIME. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST aw 22.2 22.2 west retlwwtl S"wla..Wp ron 85/20 ever, 60%fair motlente X SIDE LINO. EXPECT TREE REE D DEECLINE OVER TIME. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST 861 25.0 25.0 west retlwwtl Sequoia sempeMrons 90/30 VIVO 60%fair motlereb X SIDE IN OCT LINO. PE CT TREEE DECLINE OVER TIME. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST 862 20.6 20.6 west retlwwtl Sequoia serape .- 8=5 VIVO 60%fair motlereb X SIDE IN OCTOBER,2020, EXPECT TREE DECLINE OVER TIME. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST so 31.5 31.5 west retlwwtl Sequoia..Wp rons 90/20 7575 75%9w1 9w1 X SIDE IN OCTOBER,2020. EXPECT TREE DECLINE OVER TIME, NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST 864 23.8 23.8 west retlwwtl Sequoia sempeMrons sails Mar 68%fair motlerab X SIDE IN OCT LINE. PE CT TREEE DECLINE OVER TIME. S-h,,kform. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST 865 24.0 VLO west retlwwtl Sequoia sempeMron SUIS 60/40 47%pwr rntl-te W X Abnormal trunk SIDE IN OCTOBER,2020. section th.is EXPECT TREE DECLINE OVER cankerotl. TIME. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST a" 31.0 13.3 44.3 west retlwwtl Sequoia sempeMrons 95/28 OWN am fair mptleraw W 3 X SIDE IN OCTOBER,2020. E%PECT TREE DECLINE OVER TIME. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST 867 X 6.5 6.5 west retlwwtl Sequoia..Wp rons 30/6 65/45 55%fair motlerab X Supressetl in-da SIDE IN OCTOBER PE CT TREEE DE OVER LONE. E TIME. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST a" 16.3 16.3 west retlwwtl Sequoia semPe .- 50/18 7070 70%gwtl mptlerate X SIDE IN OCTOBER,2020. E%PECT TREE DECLINE OVER TIME. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST a" 16.0 16.0 west retlwwtl Sequoia serape .. MIS 7WW 68%fair motl0raw X SIDE IN OCTOBER,2020. EXPECT TREE DECLINE OVER E. NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST 870 27.6 27.6 west retlwwtl Sequoia sempeMrons 85/20 7575 7S%9w1 9w1 X SIDE IN OCTOBER,2020. E%PECT TREE DECLINE OVER TIME. 69 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA S m E m E'c f z a x' Scientif Name L — $ o= 2 9 m- ym+ v 'c w e E y WLCA N+tae from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon rc r$ y n - m Common Name o n c -m o. n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 x Ey a r$a c c c c c c _m„ m w.c (Genus,aPeuea) a: m mow c - 'm c a ^ r u Spring-5 Survey miaSggm as qpaYppFcEvdi L cs�o fr ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as io?� �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i m'2 & H121 + ¢¢qaw+ n8 ¢''c.A uO�Em NEIGHBORS SHEARED WEST 871 25.8 25.8 wwat retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 85/25 73175 75%9oo1 gootl X SIDE IN OCTOBER,2020. EXPECT TREE DECLINE OVER TIME. 872 23.7 15.6 38.3 wwat retlwootl Sequoia serape .- SW20 65/55 60%fair motlerete E 2 873 X 13.8 13.8 wwat retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 6S/12 25/25 25%Very Poor Poor a. 10.5 10.5 wuat retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 3W 3SM0 30%poor poor 875 14.1 14.1 coast retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 4SM0 40/00 40%poor poor AS.Lot (START OP 876 „West, "ALTERNATE LOT 31.0 31.0 coast retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 74/18 70170 70%9oo1 motlerab MST"SURVEY) 877 'Lot 23.7 23.7 worst retlwootl Sequoia.—Pp mna 6SMS 6S/60 63%fair poor to mW X West" 878 AS.Lot 18.2 18.2 worst retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 74/15 65/60 63%fair poor to mW X "West" 878 'Lot 22.8 22.8 worst retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 74/18 65/65 65%fair motlereb X West" 880 L L. wor Lot 20.5 20.5 st retlwootl Sequoia serape .- MIS 6S/S5 60%fa ir motlereb X S. 881 'Lot 20.8 11.8 32.7 worst re —I Sequoia serape .- 74/18 60/S0 58%fair motlereb 3 X West" 882 .West"'Lot 33.3 33.3 worst retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 65/20 OWN 60%fair motlerete X 889 AS.Lot 11.4 11.4 worst retlwootl Sequoia serape .- WS 30MS 33%poor poor X "West" 70 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Nem. L $ o i 2 9+- y++ v 'c w c p.H WLCA Nob.from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ea& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ .w.c (Genus,Pm- a' m mow c - 'm c a ^ r u Spnnq-5 Survey miaSggme qpaYppFc W ns U1 Evdi L cs�o fr ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n da'=go as io?e �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + ¢rck o.w+ 0.8 ¢''c.A uO�E. 884 �W 91.5 91.5 west r.tlwootl Segrro)a sempeMrens 80/18 60/60 60%tair pwrto motl W X 885 AIL Lot West" 32.1 32.1 west r.tlwootl S"wla serape .- 85/25 7SWS 75%8wtl motl0reb X 886 M.Lot 9.8 9.8 west r.tlwootl Segrrola serape .- 45/6 30/90 30%pwr pwr X West" 88l M.Lot West" 25.5 25.5 west r.tlwootl Segrrola sempeMrens 75/18 GUS 65%tair pwrto motl X 888 M.Lot West" 29.0 29.0 west r.tlwootl S"wla.—P—I.- 85/25 VMS 58%tair pwrto rr tl X 888 Aft. .L. 7 15.9 15.9 west r. .w S"wla.—Pp rens 45/8 25/25 2%rry poor X 880 M.Lot X 16.9 16.9 west r.tlwootl S"wla serape .- S0/12 0/0 0%tl.atl X West" 881 M.Lot X 29.5 29.5 west r.tlwootl S"wla serape .- 65/25 0/0 0%tl.atl X West" 882 M.Lot X 8.6 8.6 west r.tlwootl S"wla serape .- 30/6 0/0 0%tl.atl X West" 889 M.Lot 26.4 26.4 oast retlwootl S"-I.sempeMrens 75/20 70170 70%8wtl motl0reb X West" 6orryspherla NnBal Infe.tlon notetl as 884 M.Lot 18.9 18.9 west r.tlwootl S"wla serape .- 6SM2 4000 35%pwr motl0reb X w^ker pro8resslon West" alw8 trunk Honker pro8resslon over tlme. 885 AWest"M.Lot 29.4 29.4 Malian stone pin. PI.-pl— 4S/90 85175 78%9 800tl E E 886 M.Lot 26.2 26.2 Malian at...pin. Plnus pl— 45/25 80/90 SMfi,ir 8wtl E E 18 West" 71 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA IT S + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Neme L $ o i 2 m+- y++ v 'c w c p.H WLCA N+tae from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon a& $'-rc r$ y n - o Common Name o n c -m n n m g -dSi Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 x Ey a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genus,Pm-, a: m mow c - 'm c a ^ r u Spring-5 Survey mia v�`m ?c �a Sggme qpa .Faw g YppFc W ns U� EvL cs�o fr ._ ONWARD dE �'E$_- .e 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as io?e �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + aHmm n8 a''c iA uO�E+ 88] M Lot 9.6 9.6 west retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 2S/12 Moo 64%fair motlerate X 888 AIL Lot West" 17.8 17.8 west retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 4S/15 GO/60 60%fair pwrto motl X 888 M.Lot 11.4 11.4 west retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 4S/15 60/40 50%fair rr tl.mte X Sweep.f.-W nk. West" 800 M.Lot 19.7 19.7 west retlwootl Sequoia.—Pe .- GONG 3S/95 35%pwr pwr X West" 801 M.Lot 4.1 4.1 west retlweetl Sequoia serape .- 30/6 3505 35%pwr motlerab X West" 802 M.Lot 9.5 9.5 west retlw Sequoia serape .- 3S/12 65/45 50%fair motlerate X minstem'PIR-t. West" 809 M.Lot 14.7 14.7 west retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 4S/15 GUS 65%fair motlerate X West" 804 M.Lot 12.9 12.9 west re .w Sequoia.—Pe .- MIS 70170 70%9w motlerab X West" 805 M.Lot 14.7 14.7 west retlwootl Sequoia serape .- SW20 65170 68%fair motlerate X West" 806 M.Lot 19.9 19.9 oast mtlwootl Sequoia sempeMrens 70/20 70170 70%9w motlerab X West" 807 M.Lot 16.0 16.0 west retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 60/12 60/45 50%fair pwr E X West" 808 M.Lot West" 6.4 6.4 west retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 2S/10 70/40 50%fair motlerat0 E X 9, M.Lot 27.0 27.0 west retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 75/20 50150 50%fair pwr X West" 72 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' Sci.ntif Nam. L $ o i 2 m+- a++ v 'c w c p.H WLCA Nob.from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Es& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genus,Pm- a' m a o w c - 'm c a ^ r u Spdnq—5 S—W midSggme qpa .Few g YppFc W ns U� Evdi L cs�o fr ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n 'E go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + ¢¢qaw+ 0.8 ¢''c aS uO�E. 910 M. 22.8 22.8 oast—..d Sequoia sempeMrens MB GUS 65%fair poorto motl X 811 'Lot 20.4 20.4 oast re—d Sequoia sempeMrens 75120 70110 70%800tl mal.rab X West" 812 'Lot 25.5 25.5 oast—..d Sequoia sempeMrens 75118 MSG 0%fair poorto motl X S-tam trunk. West" 819 'Lot 20.2 20.2 amst rWwootl Sequoia serape .- 7118 70110 70%800tl mal.rab X West" 814 All.Lot 23.5 20.5 oast mtlwootl S"-I.sempeMrens MIS 50/60 54%fair poor X West" 815 M.Lot 14.8 14.8 awst r.tlwootl Sequoia—e Mm- 75I16 55/55 SS%fair poor X West" 816 M.Lot 16.2 10.0 26.2 amstrWwootl Sequoia sGmpe .- S5/16 75110 70%800tl mal.rab X West" 817 M.Lot 14.5 14.5 amst rWwootl Sequoia sGmpe .- 45/10 40/40 40%poor poor X West" 818 M.Lot 28.8 28.8 awst r.tlwootl Sequoia sGmpe .- 80/15 40/40 40%poor poor X West" 818 M.Lot x 17.2 17.2 coast r.tlwootl Sequoia serape .- SM 0/0 0%dead x West^ 820 Alt'Lot 24.4 24.4 amst rWwootl Sequoia sGmpe .- 80/12 70110 70%800tl mal.rab N X West" 821 Alt'Lot 21.5 21.5 Malian stone pine PI.-pinea 45/20 85/45 SS%fair 800tl E E West" 822 Alt'Lot 17.8 17.8 Malian stone pin. Plnus pinea 45/18 70/S5 40%poor flood E E West" 73 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA Ea o'p'Y 8 °rY �° E a _ ;- r=• o. ^' common Name ScientRc Name ns u; m c 5 UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon @@ WLCA NPfeafrom q ,° n _3 c d o a c �q V'rc m '- m g R.1i 9.S NOTES 2017 •�4 °e .FSw gg g o K`pt! gE cE ._E Pnng 20153urvey a°rc�o.—LL a8 2 2 2 2 2 2 $'cS uSovE�$ mr± S¢¢ Epa 8=w ONWARD Bz8 Ak.Lat x "West" tz.2 8.t 21.3 west ratlwood Sequoia sempervirens 50i4 0i0 0%dead X B24 AX.Lot "West" 12.t 12.1 coast ratlwood Sequoia sempervlrens 70110 60i50 sSX fa'a moaomto x x 925 Aft.Let "West" 208 20.8 west ratlwood Sequoia—Pe mw GW14 65i65 65%fair motlerate X 91 Aft.Lo "West" 7.5 7.5 west ratlwootl Sequoia sempeMrons 55i6 60i40 50%fair mw.nrW S X B2] Aft.Lo "West" 11.2 11.2 west ratlwootl Sequoia—Pe mw 4WS SW40 47%Ivor pwrto motl S X 921 Aft.Lot "West" 18.] 18.7 west ratlwootl S"wla sempe mw 60110 70i65 68%fair motlerate 5 X 828 Aft.Lo "West" 25.4 25.4 west ratlw Saquola sempeMm- 75i20 MOO 70%Boo1 mw.nft X Bl0 Aft.Lot "West" 18.8 18.8 west ratlw Saquola samPeM 75i18 7010 70%9ootl mw.nrW E X 931 M'Lot 'Wasp 152 15.2 west radw Sagrrola sempeMrons 85f18 60i60 60%fair P rto rr tl E X 91 Aft.Let "Wasp x 14.2 14.2 weal ratlwootl Sequoia sempeMrons 65/8 5/5 5X vary Poor very Pwr X Aft.Lot 933 "West" x 8.5 8.5 wastrWwootl Sequoia sampaMrons 3015 0/0 OX dead X 9M Aft.Lot "West" 23.5 23.5 Mwbrey Pine Plnus ratllafa 55/25 60/95 50%fair motlerate SW SW X Aft.Lo 805 "West" x 13.2 13.2 west ratlw Sequoia sempeMrons 4W7 515 5%vary poor vary Pwr E X 74 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Name L $ o i 2 m+- y++ v 'c w c F!H WLCA N+tae from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ea& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genus,Pm- a' m mow c - 'm c a ^ r u Spnnq-5 Survey miaSggme qpaYppFc W ns U� Evdi L cs�o fr ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n da'=go as io?e �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + ¢rcq o.w+ n8 ¢''c.A uO�E+ 936 �W 29.2 28.2 oast mtlw++tl Sequoia sempeMrens 70t20 TWO 70%800tl motlerab X 9, AIL Lot X 6.0 6.0 wwat retlwootl Sequoia serape .- WS 0t0 0%tleatl X West" 838 WBB. X 15.3 15.3 wwat retlwootl Sequoia.—Pe .- 60t10 20t20 2 terry very poor X 838 M.Lot 4.3 0.9 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uh&I 25/8 Wes 85%800tl 800tl X West" 840 'Lot 20.1 20.1 wwat retlwootl Sequoia serape .- GSt12 40tS0 4S%poor poor X West" 841 M.Lot 20.0 20.0 oast mtlw++tl Sequoia sempeMrens 75115 TWO 70%800tl motlerab X West" 9, M.Lot X 5.0 5.0 wwat retlwootl Sequoia serape .- GSt13 0t0 0%tleatl X West" 849 M.Lot 22.6 22.6 wwat retlwootl Sequoia.—Pe .- 6St15 60tm 0%fair poorto rr tl X West" 844 M.Lot 17.1 17.1 wwat retlwootl Sequoia serape .- 60t13 TWO 70%800tl motlerab X West" 845 M.Lot 19.4 19.4 wwat retlwootl Sequoia.—Pe .- 6St15 70t65 68%fair motlerate X Swe0p4orm W nk. West" 846 M.Lot 17.0 17.0 wwat retlwootl Sequoia serape .- GSt12 30t30 30%poor poor X West" 847 M.Lot 7.8 7.8 wwat retlwootl Sequoia serape .- WS 30t30 30%poor poor X West" 848 M. r. 23.0 23.0 Monterey Pine Plnus ratllafa W2 0t0 (STUMP) X 75 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA Ea o'p°Y 8 °rY �° E a _ ;- r=• o. ^' common Name ScientRc a $EE 5a°rciE°�Uo$°.—°O--LL? ttioa;;.F81° x2 n+2r x2 ax2 ;x2° '�2 u$'c—n`aS o.`Sooac°v»EsCa•�a°�24$ (Genus,spNecmies WLCA ZNPolSurvay UPtletl Oel CotlXo n gPng Raings 8 NOTES2017Sfo ONWARD s9s Ax.Let ^w.at^ x 1z.z 12.2 west and a°Pd Sequoia aempervirona 50/5 ao 0%awe x 850 Aft.Lot "West" 16.6 16.6 west ratlwoPd Saquola sempervlrons 60118 MS 75%goo11 mwtl x 9, Aft.Let "West" 24.5 29.5 Xalun atom pine Plnus plrrea 15/2 a/0 0%dead X 91 Aft.Lo "West" 18.5 19.5 Xalian atone pine Plnus plwa 3a/20 6040 40%—r 9ootl E E Severe lean. 95Y Aft.Lot "West" 22.7 22.7 west ratlwwtl S"wla semp—Im" awls SW45 47%pwr pwrto motl X 959 Aft.Lot "West" x 8.7 8.7 west ratlwwtl Sequoia semP-Im" 25/5 S/5 5%w 7 Pwr very poor X AX.Lot 855 "West" 7 17.7 1r.7 west rWwootl Sequoia semP—Im" 40118 25/25 2514 ry Poor very Pwr x 91 Aft.Lot "West" 25.9 25.9 west ra —! Sequoia sempeMrons 65/20 50/50 50%fair pwr P motl X 91 Aft.Lot "WasY 14.0 1A8 27.8 coast radw .Segaola serape m_ S913 30/Y0 30% Pwr pwr 2 X Aft.Let 91 "Wasp 7 6.4 6.4 west r ootl $equoia sempeMm- 4014 S/5 5%vary pwr very Pwr X 9. Aft.Lot ^West" 21.4 21,9 wutretlwraM Saquo/a sempaMrons 65/18 45/95 45%pwr pwr X 9. Aft.Lot "West" 5.5 5.5 Shamel ash Faxlnus uhtlW 25/10 85/60 55%fair go°tl g g X 961 Aft.Lot "West" 21.5 21.5 west ratlwootl Spuola sempeMrons 60/18 9000 YO%poor X 76 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Neme L $ o i 2 m+- y++ v 'c w c p.H WLCA N+tae from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ev& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genus,Pm- a' m mow c - 'm c a ^ r u Spnnq-5 Survey miaSggme qa .Faw g YppFc W ns U� Evdi L cs�o fr ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as ide �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + ¢rcgaw+ 0.8 ¢''c.A uO�E. 962 M. 14.5 14.5 coast retlwootl Sequoia s.mp. .- 3S/14 30/S0 30%poor X 863 M.Lot 0.0 0.0 CeIl Wpepper S.M.-moll. 1717 7WS 75%8wtl 800tl West" tree 864 Alt'Lot X 17.8 17.8 west retlwootl Sequel.s.mp. .- 40/6 0/0 0%tleatl X West" 865 M.Lot 16.5 16.5 west retlwootl Sequel..—Pe .- 55/15 30/S0 30%pwr X West" 866 W.atm" T 18.8 18.8 west retlwootl Sequoia sempeMrens 50/S 23/25 2 terry poor X 867 AIL Lot 6.8 3.7 10.5 Shamel ash F7 I.-uhtlel 3S/14 85170 75%8wtl 800tl X West" 868 AIL Lot 7 15.1 15.1 west retlwootl Sequel.s.mp. .- 35/4 0/0 0%tleatl X West" 868 AIL Lot 5.6 5.6 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 3S/12 7WS 7S%8wtl 800tl X West" 870 Alt'Lot 7 8.2 8.2 west retlwootl Sequel.s.mp. .- 40/8 5/5 5%vary poor very poor X West" 871 WBB 7 7.7 7.7 west re .w Sequel.s.mp.Mrens SS/18 20/20 2%rry very poor X 872 Alt'Lot 22.2 22.2 west retlwootl Sequel.s.mp. .- 65/20 GUS 65%hir mw..t. X West" 879 M.Lot 18.5 18.5 west retlwootl Sequel.s.mp. .- 65/20 40/40 40%pwr poor X 'p,"APkal m m has West" bean sPIX wt. 874 Alt'Lot 18.4 18.4 west re .w Sequels..mp .- 65120 7WS 75%8wtl motlereb X Wast" 77 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA IT S + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Nama L $ o i 2 m+- y++ v 'c w c p.H WLCA N+tac from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ea& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genoa,Pm- a' m mo w c - 'm c a ^ r u Spnn9—5 S—W miaSggme qpaYppFc W ns U� Evdi L cs�o fr ._ ONWARD dE �'E$_- .e 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + ¢maw+ 0.8 a''c iA uO�E+ 975 M. 29.2 29.2 west retlwootl Sequoia.—Pe .- WIG GUS 65%fair mw.n,W N X 876 'Lot 10.6 10.6 west retlwootl Sequoia—pa .- 55/12 70/65 68%fair motlerete X West" 871 All.Lot 10.9 10.9 west retlwootl Sequo/a sempeMrens 55/12 GUS 65%fair motlerete X West" 878 All.Lot 28.6 28.6 west retlwootl Sequoia sempeMrens MIS 70170 70%9wtl motlereb X West" 878 All.Lot 29.8 29.8 west retlwootl Sequoia.—Pa .- S0/1S 6a/60 60%fair pwr W mw X West" 880 All.Lot 20.5 20.5 oast retlwootl Saquola sempeMrens MIS 6a/60 60%fair pwrto mW X West" 881 M.Lot 20.9 20.9 west retlwootl Sequoia.—Pa .- Sa/16 7WS 75%9wtl motlereb X West" 882 M.Lot 20.0 20.0 oast retlwootl Saquola sempeMrens MIS 45/00 0%pwr pwr X West" 889 M.Lot 16.2 16.2 west retlwootl Sequoia.—Pa .- Sa/15 6a/60 60%fair pwr w mw X West" 884 M.Lot 29.0 29.0 west retlwootl Sequoia—pa .- MIS 65/65 65%fair motlerete NW X Sweep.f.-Wnk. West" 885 M.Lot 28.8 28.8 west retlwootl Sequoia serape .- MIS 45/45 4S%Pwr Pwr x west^ 886 All.Lot 22.0 16.7 38.7 west retlwootl Sequoia wraps .- MIS 45/45 4S%pwr pwr X West" 887 Alt'Lot 19.2 19.2 west retlwootl Sequoia wraps .- 55/12 6a/S0 55%fair pwr w raw X West" 78 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA IT S + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Name L $ o i 2 m+- y++ v 'c w c t'.H WLCA Notae from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ea& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genus,Pm- a' m sto w c - 'm c a ^ r u Spnnq-5 Survey miaSggme qpaYppFc W ns U� Evdi L cs�o fr ._ ONWARD dE �'E$_- .e 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as ids �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i +'2 & H121 + ¢maw+ 0.8 a''c iA uO�E+ 868 'Lot 26.7 26.7 oast retlwootl Saquola sempeMrens 7a15 45/45 45%Pwr Poor X West" 888 All.Lot 10.2 10.2 west retlwootl Segrrola serape .- 9a12 Gatm 55%fair motlerete X West" 880 All.Lot 27.9 27.9 west retlwootl S"wla.—Pe .- WIG GOM 60%fair Pwrto motl X West" 881 All.Lot 25.0 25.0 west retlwootl Segrrola sempeMrens 8a17 43/45 45%Poor Poor X west^ 882 All.Lot 29.5 29.5 was retlwootl S"wla.—Pe .- SaiS 45tM 48%Poor Poor to mW x west^ 889 M.Lot 20.7 20.7 oast retlwootl Saquola sempeMrens 75H2 3090 30%Pwr Poor X West" 884 M.Lot 39.9 39.9 west retlwootl S"wla wraps .- VMS 45/S5 W%fair P rto mW X West" 885 M.Lot 16.1 16.1 west retlwootl S"wla serape .- Gan 3S/95 35% West" pwr Poor X 34runk form. 886 M.Lot 16.8 16.8 west retlwootl S"wla wraps .- GS/1G 55/55 55%fair Poor W raw X West" 887 M.Lot 17.9 17.9 west retlwootl S"wla serape .- GS/14 GOM GM fair w.mt. 4S X West" 886 M.Lot 21.1 21.1 west retlwootl S"wla wraps .- MIS GS/65 65%fair w.mt. X a form. West" 888 All.Lot 29.9 29.9 west retlwootl S"wla wraps .- MIS OWN 60%fair Poor w raw X West" 1w0 Alt'Lot 12.0 12.0 west retlwootl S"wla wraps .- 6a16 GUS 65%fair w.mt. X "West" 79 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA If S + E+ E c f z a x' Sciantif Name L $ o f 2 S+- y++ v 'c w e C H WLCA N+tac from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon s& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 x Ey a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genus,Pm-, a' m mow c - 'm c a ^ >, u Spring-5 Survey mia v�`m ?c �a Sggme qpa .Fuca g YppFc W ns U� EvL cs�o fr ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + ¢¢qaw+ 0.8 ¢''c aS uO�E+ 1W1 M.Lot 12.7 12.7 oast retlwootl Sequoia semPoMrens S0/13 55/50 54%fair poortomod X "West" 1W2 M.Lot 16.8 16.8 oast retlwootl Sequel.semPoW.- VMS 4S/S0 48%Poor poor X West" 1W9 AX.Lot 12.4 12.0 11.5 35.8 west retlwootl S"wla semPoW.- MIS 65/60 65%fair moderate X West" 1W4 AX.Lot 20.7 20.7 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempeMrens 70116 40/40 40%poor poor iS X West" 1W6 AX.Lot 10.0 10.0 oast retlwootl Sequel.semPoW.- 35/14 SW45 48%poor mW.mw X West" 1W6 Alt'L. 26.7 26.7 oast retlwootl Sequel.semPoW.- 75/18 30/00 30%Poor Poor X "West" 1W7 Alt'Lot 16.8 16.8 west retlwootl Sequel.semPoW.- MIS 30/S0 30%Poor poor X West" 1W8 Alt'Lot 18.8 18.8 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempeMrens 70/16 60/60 60%fair poortomod X West" 1 W0 M.Lot q 16.6 16.6 st retlwootl Sequoia semPo W.- SS/18 10/10 10%very APbal mar- Is "West" we Poor very poor X g- o M,Lot 7 17.7 17.7 waat retlwootl Sequoia sempo W- 65/15 1S/15 1 terry very Poor X Chain around trunk h girtlllNg the tree, 1011 M.Lot q 10.8 10.8 st retlwootl Sequoia semPo W.- MIS 2S/25 25%wry and must be "West" we Poor very poor X movetl ASAP In order..vow the re�beln 1012 AIL West"Lot 21.7 21.7 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempeMrens 7- 60/60 60%fair Poor to mod X 1019 AXWest".Lot 26A 26A coast retlwootl Sequoia..WoWrens 75/18 30/S0 30%Poor poor X 10u A,,Lot 7 15.1 15.1 coast retlwootl Sequoia sempo W.- 70/13 20/20 2 Mrry very Poor X 1o16 M,Lot 7 18.4 18.4 west retlwootl Sequoia sempo W.- GS/14 2S/25 2%rry very Poor X Lot Apical medsbm 1016 "West" 16.6 16.6 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempeMrens 70116 40/35 38%Poor poor X tlanewetl off from vertical. 1017 ,Lot 7 10.1 13.1 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempeMrens 55/13 50/20 2%rry very Poor X 80 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA If S + E+ E'c f z e x' Scientif Nema L c$ o= 2 m+- y++ v 'c w c p.y WLCA Notae from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ea& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ a w.c (Genus,Pm- a' m mow c - 'm c a ^ >, u Spnn82pt5 Survey miaSggme qa .Few g YppFc W ns U� Evdi L cs�o fr ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as io?e �2.� nQ 2$ -'i +'2 & H121 + 0.8 ¢''c.A uO�E+ +0+9 MWBB 16.8 16.8 oast mtlwootl Spuo)a.-Pp rens SWIG 30/20 2 terry poor X +0+9 .West"Lot 26.5 26.5 oast mtlwootl S"wla.-Pp rens 7S/18 GWS 70%800tl motlarab X +020 M.L. 7 6.8 6.8 west retlwootl Spuola serape .- 20/4 30/20 2 terry poor X +02+ AX.Lot 8.7 8.7 west retlwootl Spuola serape .- M12 7S/55 65%fair motlwata X West" +022 AX.Lot 21.0 21.0 oast mtlwootl S"wla.-Pp rens 55/13 35/40 38%pwr pwr X West" +029 Alt'Lot 24.8 24.8 oast mtlwootl Spuola.-Pp rens 7510 SW65 60%fair pwr to rr tl X "West" 10�� M.Lot 17.7 17.7 west retlwootl Spuola serape .- 60/14 60/65 65%fair motlwata X West" +026 Alt'Lot 8.8 8.8 west retlwootl Spuola.-Pp rens WIG 60/45 53%fair motlwata X West" +026 AX.Lot 16.5 16.5 west retlwootl Spuola serape .- 40/10 60/60 60%fair motlwata X "West" +027 Alt'Lot 20.6 20.6 west ratlwootl Spuola serape -. GS/14 70170 70%800tl mw.n,W X West" +029 AX.Lot 18.8 18.8 west ratlwootl Spuola serape .- 60/14 SW45 50%fair P rto rr tl X West" +029 WBB 7 16.4 16.4 west retlwootl Spuola.-Pp rens 60/10 20/20 2%rry very Poor X Apical stem is tlaetl. +000 Alt'Lot 7 17.5 17.5 west ratlwootl Spuola.-Pp rens 63/10 S/S 5%vary poor very pwr X West" +09+ Alt'Lot 7 21.0 21.0 west ratlwootl Spuola.-Pe .- 65/10 5/5 5%vary poor very pwr X "West" +002 AX.Lot 28.7 28.7 west ratlwootl Spuola sempeMrens late 55/40 47%pwr pwrlo motl 40 X west^ +009 AX.Lot 18.5 18.5 west ratlwootl Spuola.-Pp rens 55/13 63/65 65%fair motlwata X West" +001 Alt'Lot 24.8 24.8 west retlwootl Spuola serape .- MIS 7010 70%800tl motlarab X west^ 81 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E'c f z e x' Sciantif Name L i $ o= 2 S+- y++ v 'c w c t'.y WLCA Notae from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Es& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 201] y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genoa,aPmoo a' = mow c - 'm c a ^ r u some 2015 Survey miaSggme qpa .Few g YppFc W ns U� Evdi L cs�o fr ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go IS as io?e �8 �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + ¢¢qaw+ 0.8 ¢''c aS uO�E+ +Oas Aft.Lot 17.0 17.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia samPeMrens ]6/14 7005 50%fair row.nde 8 x "west" +Oa6 Aft,west^Lot 30.4 30.4 oast retlwootl Sequola se P000l.s S5/2s ➢SITS 75%gootl oo Btl x +00] Aft,Lot west^ 23.3 23.3 coast retlwaotl Sequola.-pool.- Solis Moo 66%f i, motlerete x Aft,Lot Aplwl stem missing +OaB "West" 22.0 22.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempeMrens ]OHS 60/So 55%Pair poorto motl X (plown out). +Oa9 Aft.LWest"ot 25.8 25.8 oast retlwootl Sequola sempom.- 80/20 ]0I]0 70%gootl now-le X +040 AX'Lot 45.4 45.0 oast retlwootl S"wla se P000l.s Somo ]0/6] 70%gootl mW.mw S X "West" I- Aft.Lot 28.1 28.1 west retlwootl Sequola sempo ol.- S0/15 ]0I]0 ]0%gootl motlerete X West" +062 Aft.Lot West" 17.5 17.5 west retlwootl Sequola.-pool.- SO/io Moo GM fair motlerete X +049 Aft.Lot 36.5 36.5 west retlwootl Saquola.-pool.- MIS 7510 73%gootl gootl X "West" +pu AftWBB ] 11.5 11.5 weal retlwootl Spuola sampeMrens 601T 20/20 2 terry very lwor X +045 Aft.Lot West" 33.7 33.7 west retlwootl Saquola sempeMreos 80/13 Moo 63%fair or tl.mte E X +OW M.Lot 27.8 27.8 west retlwootl Sequola.-pool.- 80/12 Gs/so 57%fair or tl.mte E 70 X West" +ea] Aft.West"Lot 21.0 21.0 west retlwootl Saquola em. pool.- S0/12 Moo 68%fair row.nde E X +048 Aft.Lot 17.2 17.2 west retlwootl Sequola.-pool.- 60/12 Moo 67%fair row.nde E X "West" +Old Aft.Lot West" 43.8 43.8 west retlwootl Sequola.-pool.- 80/iS ]0I]0 70%gootl gootl E X +050 Aft,LWest"ot 26.8 26.8 west retlwootl Sequoia. pool.- S0/12 70/60 68%fair gootl w X loll Alt.Lot 27.4 27.4 west retlwootl Sequoia.-pool.- 80/12 Moo 70%9wtl good w X west^ 82 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA S + E+ E c f z a x' Sciantif Nam. L $ o f 2 8+- y++ v 'c w e C H WLCA Nob.from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon rc r$ y n - o Common Name o n c -m n n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 201] x E y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ .w.c (Genoa,.Pere.) a: m mow c - 'm c a ^ >, u Spring-5 Survey miaSggme qpa .Few g YppFc W ns U� Evdi L cs�o fr ._ ONWARD dE �'E$_- .e 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as io?e �8 �2.� nQ 2$ -'i +'2 & H121 + ¢¢qaw+ 0.8 ¢''c.A u0�E+ 1.12 M'Lot 23.6 23.6 oast reawootl Sequo)a.-Povi.- 80/12 70M 64%hair goon W x "West" Lot Looat.tl w steep 1099 "West" 23.2 23.2 oast reawootl Sequel..-Povi.- 80/12 MM 64%hair go°a S x slop..Possible stability issues? M.Lot Looat.tl w steep 10& "West" 24.6 24.6 west r.tlwow S"wla.-Povi.- 80/10 70/S0 65%hiir goo. S x slop..Possible stability issues? LotLocw.a w steep 1095 "West" 27.8 27.8 west r.tlwow S"wla.-Povi.- 80/13 Mel 6]%hair goo. S X slope.Possible stability issues? 1096 .West"'Lot 25.9 25.8 oast reawootl Sequel..-Povi.- 80/12 SUN 57%hiir Poor to motl x ton M'Lot 27.0 27.0 oast retlwow Sequel..-Povi.- ]6/15 ]ono 70%go°a go°a x "weal" AX.Lot S41unk at 44aet 1098 "West" 28.7 28.7 west rWwootl Sequo/a sempeMrens 75I18 ]ono ]o%gootl gootl X eMvA- 109a 1.r. 29.3 22.0 51.3 west r.tlwow S"wla.-Povi.- 80/18 70/60 68%Pair 1°9 to 2 x 106o M.Lot X ].6 ].6 -ft aM.r Alo-rhombl]olla 1w Will 20%vary low.' "West" poor Poor X trunk x M.Lot S4ronk form 1p61 „West" 19.6 19.6 west raawooa Sequoia sempeMrens 60/12 70/55 63%fair goon W X belw..n uro entl 15P.at 1p62 .West"'Lot 9.9 9.9 west raawooa Sequoia sempeMrens 4S/8 ]0/65 70%gooa go°a S x ot 1p69 WBB 19.4 19.4 west r.tlwootl Sequola sempovl.- 60/12 ]0/65 68%Pair 1°9 to x 1pW 'Lo1 12.2 12.2 Snamel asn FYaxlnus uhael 3S/30 SM SOY.hair Poor to motl W X West" 1p65 M'Lo1 12.0 12.0 Snamel asn Raxlnus uhael 35/25 80/60 67%hiir goon SW SW X "West" R.qulres.ntlw.ight reauc0w pruning. 1p66 .Lot 32.2 32.2 harm.stone pin. PI.- 30140 ]5/45 SB%fair goon S 4 N- nartow me Odnt below sWnaaraM hr. R.qulres.ntlw.ight red",I*n pruning. 1pn .Lot 25.] 25.] harm.stone pin. PI.- 2S/35 6S/40 52%fair motl.mte S S 6 No E at nartow me oomt below stanaartl M 1, R.qulres end..Ight retluo[lon pruning. 1p68 WBBot 24.6 24.6 harm.stone pin. PI.-plrma 30/35 75M 66%fair goo. 12 NO Eat nartow me ydm.slow awnaera nel ht. 83 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA m E m E'c f z a x' Scientif Name L - $ o= 2 9 m- ym+ v 'c w e C y WLCA Notae from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Em& $'-rc r$ y n - m Common Name o n c -m n n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ m w.c (Genoa,aPeuea) a' m mow c - 'm c a ^ r u Spring-5 Survmy miaSggm as qa .Few g YppFc W ns U� Evdi L cs�o fr ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n da'=go as ids �2.� nQ 2$ -'i m'2 & H121 + ¢¢qaw+ 0.8 ¢''c.A uO�Em Raqulres antlwaight red_u-Pruning. 1p69 ft.L. 24.2 24.2 Xwimn atone pine Plnus Plnaa 30M5 15/60 68%fair gootl N 18 N- nartow me Odnt below • dartl hal ht. _o West." X 15.4 15.4 Monbrey Pine Plnus ladles 20/20 90/20 2 terry poor S 1 X 1011 Aft'Lo1 9.0 9.0 honey locust Gledltrla Wacanlhos 23/18 35/40 37%Poor poor X West" 1012 Aft.Lot West" 8.3 8.3 honey locust Gledltrla Wacanl- MIS 40/25 33%Poor poor INX 1019 Aft'Lo1 8.9 8.9 honey locust Gledksla Wacanl- 25/20 40/40 40%Poor poor X West" 1014 M.Lot 8.2 8.2 honey locust Gledltrla Wacanl- 25/20 40/90 40%Poor Poor X "West" 1o75 Aft.Lot X 7.6 7.6 26%vary "West" wergraen pear Pyres kawakam/l iW19 23/25 very Poor IN Fireblight irlfac0on Poor 1o76 M.Lot X 8.8 8.8 25%vary "West" evergreen pear Pyres kawakamll 20/20 23/25 very poor S X Fireblight irlfac0on Poor 1a71 M.Lot 12.9 12.8 „West" evergreen pear Pyres kawskamll 90/30 90/90 95%poor motlareb X Fireblight irlfac0on 1a78 Aft'Lot 9.2 9.2 honey bcuat Gledsla blacanffi- 2=5 65/60 69%fair mw.nft X West" Aft 101a 'Lot 6.7 6.7 honey locust Gledsla blaoa M- lolls 65/55 60%fair rlw.a X "West" 1W0 .West"'Lot 8.5 8.5 honey locust Gledksla blacanffi- 25/20 65/60 63%fair motlareta X Aft.L. Will naetl antlwaight 1W1 "West" 19.8 19.8 halien atone pine PI.-plrma 30/40 80110 15%gootl gootl E red.dio.PmningX '.inatl. Will naetl antlwaight Aft.Lot retluction Pmning X 1.2 "West" 32.8 32.8 Xwimn atone pine Plnus plrrea 35/30 80/60 67%fair gootl S 15 ratainetl.Nwa: auratl at 2 feet .levagon. Will naetl 1W3 Aft'Lot 22.1 22.1 halien a tone pine Plnus plrma 30/30 80/65 68%fair gootl N N antlwaight Wear" red otlnn pruning X aWlnatl. Aft.Lot Note:measuretl at 3 1W4 "West" 23.9 23.9 halien atone pine PI.-plrma 25/25 15/45 55%fair gootl S 4 fawakva0on. Aft.Lot Note:maasuretl at 3 1W5 "Warr" 18.4 18.4 halien atone pine Plnus Plnaa 28/30 80/50 65%fair gootl S 4 feat akvatlon. 84 of 96 Va110o Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA updated overag condition E g a c N F Z ^ n 6cientigc Name u $ o n•- o Z i u y.m to a o a q a g .e c n Sp��9 zoi survey Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 Y a E d Y v °' Common Name c c - c E S o g ..5 ONWARD -, „ r g V a »q d (Genus.species 1 g s i6 g a m e W w W o w E 6� rca°in _ 2 2 2 2 2 2 ga5 HEn S4ruMcfam. 10a6 AM.Lot 17.6 1T.6 (Mien stone pine Plnus plwa 3=5 8ou65 75%goo4 gootl "West" Lot 0.4 0.4 tdeaa�ding (dead slanding�) 10/4 0/0 0%doed fro] "West" X 1008 AN.Lot 7.0 7.0 6.5 M5 coast Peden ed Spool,sempeMrons 25/10 Swe" 80%good good "West" X AS, ].5 7,5 west red n ed Sequoia sempeMrens 2WI0 Saudi, 80%good good 10ae Lot "West" X 1090 AS,Lot 0.5 45 weft redened Sequola sempeMrons Iwo BONS 50%good good "West" X 12.5 west redwood Sequoia sempeMrens SOH) Two 70%good Hood 1091 AX.Lot 12.5 "West" X 1.2 A8.Lot 0.] 4.1 8.8 west redwood $equoia semP.A- 20115 wSO S0Y good good "West" X 1o9a 'Lre 5.7 5.0 11.0 weal rsdwoui Sequoia sempeMrens 25112 awsa a%good good "West" X 1094 Aft.- 15A taA weal redwood Segoola sempeMrens Swil 70160 66%tair mod cute "West" Trunk Oiamebr esematetl.Tree hes 2 IY Sued railatleWclurelly, AS"- 42.0 42.0 Mstun atom Pi^e PlwaPllwa 25l]0 Sala Poor end is IYing w the lofts „West^ X erPPna. Trunk measured at INNAS"L 31.6 Refunslonepine Pro-plrrea 25/25 80u55 64%Pair good IN IN2feetelevztbn. 8t.d "West" 26%ver/ X AS.Lot 12.2 t1.2 Wdp tree Lldodandron WllPMwa 90/12 25/25 Pool very poor 10B> "West" X X 1roe AS,Lot T 12.6 12A Wlip tree Lldodendron 1d11Ptlera 25/10 4000 80%poor poor "Wost" Needs entlwelght 1pH8 AB.Lot 2T.8 27.8 (Mien stone Pine PI.-plop, 35/45 85/55 TO%good good SW SW 0retluc[lon Pruning. West" Trunk alame e tl.Tree h has fml.d. ranee awomranr. A8.LU 16.0 (Mien stone pine Plnus plo n, 20u85 0/0 0%dead end Is lying on the ground as tleaa 1166 Me wood. West" pines appear[o f In small1 tllamet.m.o planter as,due[o melr 11p1 AB.Lot T 18.8 18.8 Relon,stone Pine PI.-plop, 40/00 Soto 50%rair good NW NW root develorunc t ereing been se "West" Ir restrlcba In terms or lateral 85 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' Sciantif Nam, L $ a i 2 m+- y++ v 'c w c p.H WLCA Ndae from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Ea& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m o. n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 201] y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ a w.c (Genus,apecr- a: m mow c - 'm c a ^ >, u Spring-5 S-W miaSggme qa .Few g YppFc W ns U� EvL cs�o fr ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n da'=go as ide �2.� nQ 2$ -'i +'2 & H121 a 0.8 ¢''c.A uO�E, Same as'nd,s'far 1102 38.3 38.3 -can stone pine PI.-pinea 40/28 80/47 50%ftir gtl SW SW tre,g1101.Trunk "West" 9-1dlit-measured d 1 fod,kvatlan. Same as'nd,s'far AN.Ld 10%v.ry tre,g1101.Trunk 1109 "West" X 24.7 24.7 Ihlhn stone pine PI.-plrrea 90/25 60/0 Poor 9-ti S S diameter m,asuretl d 2 feat elavatlon. Same as'nd,s'for 11W M.L. X 28.0 28.0 ftim.stone pin, PI.-plane 20/20 0/0 0%d.d tre,g1101.Trunk West" dlamdar m,asuretl d 2 feat elavatlon. Recammentl ne wo AN.Ld Eucatytpus re cotlaminant 1106 "WBBt" 5.0 4.5 9.5 rn,r retl gum camaldul.nsis 30/10 90145 60%hill g-li 1 X ..In-..at the fork at 1 fod elavatlon. southern ROob tlamagetl on 1106 X 8.0 8.0 magndla Magnolia gmndlgora 20116 50/50 50%ftir poor to moo x grad.from mowing ac8vhias. southern Rode tlamagetl on I- X 6.8 6.8 magndla Magrmlla gmndffl- MIS 50/50 50%fair poor tO moo x grad,from mowing ac8vhias. southern Rode tlamagetl on 11a8 X 9.0 9.0 magndla Magnolia gmndlgom 23120 Mir 0%ftir poor to moo X gr+d,from mowing a 8 x as. Ranh tlamagetl 11os X 41.8 41.8 Shamd ash Faxlnus uhM 6S/60 80/60 73%9-ti good E X frorn recant curb replacement activNks. Ranh tlamagetl 111. X 10.5 10.5 Shamd ash Fraxlnus uhdd 3S/20 30MO 30%poor poor W x gr 6 X frorn recant curb replacement activXks. Ranh tlamagetl 111, X 14.7 14.7 Shamd aeh FraXlnus uhdll 40/20 30/30 30%poor poor E x gr 10 X frorn recant curb replacement activXks. Ranh tlamagetl 1112 X 26.6 26.6 Shamd ash Faxlnus uhM 6SMS 60/60 60%fair motl.rete SW gr X frarn recant curb replacement activXks. High rNk aXuatlon: Split"hanger"Ilmb 1119 X 33.5 33.5 Shamd ash Fraxlnus uhdel ]0(]0 6s/55 60%fair il,tl.mte 35 gr X '-d at 35 feat eavatlon+n nodh sitle d canopY nestle to be 111. 19.2 19.2 Shamd ash F 1.-uhdel 3SMS SMS Ts%gootl goad S S x X ROOK tlamagetl on (monkar the girdling a,rious griIi.Nde severe 111, root sNudbn) 22.9 22.9 Shamd aeh Fraxlnus uhdd 3505 Britoil45%i-r gootl E E girdrel'Idng rtllin9 root sll A-. Roob tlamagetl on 111. 24.2 24.2 Shamd ash Fraxlnus uhdd 4010 BOSS 65%fair 9-ti x gr x grade Trom mowing acBVXias. 24.7 24.7 Shamd ash Faxlnus uhM 45/40 40MO 35% throughout rw.damagetlin poor poor E ncDY X area.fro rfie.. g ativxi,s. Rode tlamagetl on 111. 23.0 23.0 Shamd ash Fraxlnus uhM SW40 60/S0 55%fair motlwd. W W X X gratl,from mowing activities. 86 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E'e f z e x' Sckntif Name L i $ o= 2 m+- y++ v 'c w e C y WLCA No[ee from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon ! Ea& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - Ratings 8 NOTES 201] N a r$a c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genoa,aPeclea) a: = ra o w c - 'm c a ^ >, u Spring 2015 Survey miaSggme qa .Few g YppFc W ns U� EvL cs�o fr ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n da'=go as ide �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + ¢¢kaw+ n2 ¢''c.A uO�Eo Rails tlamagetl on grade hem mowing 111a X 18.6 18.6 SM1amelasM1 Faxlnus uhtlel 45/20 15/15 15%vary ac[IVXka. poor very poor X gr Recommend eve tree tlue to overall Roots tlamagetl on 1120 26.7 26.7 SM1amelasM1 Faxlnus uhdel SW40 7S/65 70%good good N E X X gratlo from mowing ac8v8ies. Root tlamegetl on 1121 19.7 19.7 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uh&1 SW35 80/65 76%good good W W X X gratlo from mowing aotivries. Rails damaged on gratlo tram mowing 21.4 21.4 SM1amel-h Fraxlnus uh&1 Goon 40/40 40%poor poor W X pto2 X adh4des.Vehicle cdlblon caused damage to hunk between zero and 2 Root tlamegetl on gratlo flan mowing 1123 18.5 18.5 SM1amel-h Faxlnus uhdel SW30 65/55 58%fair mw.rIle W X gr X eo ivNea.Root plate upper surtacec are espoced. Root tlamagetl on gratlo flan mowing 15.5 15.5 SM1amel aeM1 Faxlnus uhdel 90/18 40/30 95%poor poor W X gr X adivNea.Root plate upper surtacec ere espocatl. Rods tlamagetl on 1- 13.8 13.8 SM1amelasM1 Faxlnus uhdel 40/20 SUN 40%poor moderete W S X girtlling X gratlo hem mowing. root Nile severe girtlling root aXuatlon. TREE REMOVED FROM LANDSCAPE. 1121 X 2.7 2.] retl maple Acwrubrum 16/8 sates 80%Good Good Chlordlc follage.Soil mdsture def k. 1- X 1.9 1.9 retl maple Aewrubrum 1316 VY60 60%Fair Nod Chlordlc foliage.Soil mdsture deficit. 112. X 2.0 2.0 retl maple Acwrubrum 13/6 53/SS 55X Fair Motl Chkrdk follage.Soil mdsture tlA.ft. 112o X 1.8 1.8 retl maple Acwrubrum 10/S 9S/35 35X Poor Poor Chkrdk klkge.Soll mdsture dA.11. 1131 X 1.9 1.8 retl maple Acwrubrum 11/S 9S/35 35X Poor Poor Chkrdk klkge.Soll mdsture da.k. 11I2 X 1.4 1.4 retl maple Acwrubrum 8/S 3SMS 35%Poor Poor Chkrdk folage.Soil mdsture daft. 87 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA IT Z + E o E c f z a x' Sckntif Name L $ o f 2 m+- y++ v 'c w e l°H WLCA Nobs b+m UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon st Ea& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - a Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genus,aPm- a: m sto w c - 'm c a ^ r u Spring-5 Survey miaSggme qpa .Few g YppFc W ns U� Evdi L cs�o fr ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as ids �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i o'2 & H121 + ¢rck o.w+ n8 ¢''c.A uO�E+ 1139 X 1.9 1.9 and maple Acerrubrum 1316 37145 39%Poor Poor Chlorotic foliage.Soil moisture tlegcll. Purple Robe locust Robinla'Purpk Robe' 20112 8w6s 70%Gootl North 9 het. R,on-d as of Jan,2020. 4.5 Purple Robe locust Robinla'Purple Robe' 20/12 05I85 ]0%Gootl North (1.2. Removed as of Jan,2020. X 3.2 Purple Robe locust Robinla'Purple Robe' 25112 ]01]0 ]0%Gootl Motl Removed as of Jan,2020. 1137 X 4.7 Purple Robe locust Robinla'Purple Robe' 20113 ]0150 80%Fair Motl 1 to 4 feat Removed as of Jan,2020. 113. X 3.8 Purple Robe locust Robinla'Purple Robe' 20112 ]01]0 ]0%Gootl Motl Removed as of Jan,2020. X 3.7 3.7 Purple Robe locust Robin/a'Purpk Robe' 20/13 ]OI]0 ]0%Gootl Motl West Rem d as of Jan,2020. 11 X 4.3 4.3 gowering pear Pyrus calleryana 15I10 40I80 45%Poor Motl Removed as of Jan,2020. 1141 X 4.4 4.4 Purple Robe locust Robinla'Purple Robe' 20115 55I55 55%Fair Poor to Motl NONh 0 to 5 feat Removed as of Jan,2020. X 3.7 3.7 Purple Robe locust Robinla'Purple Robe' 2WI4 05l70 78%Go I Motl Removed as of Jan,2020. 1143 X SA 5A Purple Robe locust Robinla'Purple Robe' 28/10 05/55 65%Fair Motl to Gootl 0 to 6 feet Removed as of Jan,2020. 11 X 3.8 3.8 Purple Robe locust Robinla'Purpk Robe' 20/12 MM Sw%Fair Motl Removed as of Jan,2020. r1141X 3.4 3.4 Purple Robe kcust Robinla'Purple Robe' 20112 70/55 61%Fair Motl 0to 8 feet Removed as of Jan,2020. 88 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA oc + E o E c f z a x' ScknNf Name from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Es& Name Ratings 8 NOTES 201] N (Genoa,aPeuea) a: m mow c - c a ^ u SPdng 2p15 Survey +u � iF x x x i x x miaSggme qa .Few g Ypc _ ns U� OL cs�o ft ._ ONWARD dEEo = E' 2 2 2 2 2 2 n di'Eo3 go as nQ 20 02 ¢c4 a°wn a8 ¢m'c aS uO�'E .4 Pu 1.Robe locust obinia'Purple Robe' 10/13 M. 64X Fair Removetl as of Jan,MM. 0.1 4.1 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 25114 BSI]5 00%Gaatl Motl to Gaatl Removetl as o(Jan,2020. 0.2 4.2 Purple Robe locust No--Parple Robe' 24114 fi5/40 46%Poor Motl 0 to 10 feet Removetl as of Jan,2020. 114a X 0.] 4.7 Purple Robe locust Robinla'Purple Robe' 24113 70/57 63%Fair Motl o.6 f.. Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1150 X 5.6 - Purple Robe locust Robmia'Purple Robe' 29110 70/59 66%Fair Gaatl Oto]f.. Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1151 X 5.0 5.0 Purple Robe locust No-'Purple Robe' 37118 05/60 72%Goad Motl to Gaatl Removetl as.Jan,2020. 1112 X 3.6 3.6 Purple Robe locust No--Parple Robe' 22110 55/45 40%Poor Poor to Mod Weat Wast 0.4feet Removed as of Jan,2020. 1- X 3.8 3.0 Purple Robe locust No--Parple Robe' 2.11 6- 40%Poor Poor to Mod Weat Wast 0 to 3 feN A111 feet Removed as of Jan,2020. 1154 X 2.7 2.7 flowering pear Pyrus calleryana 1217 50150 50%Fair Motl Wast Removed as of Jan,2020. 1154 X 3A 3.0 flowering pear Pyrus calleryana 1017 50150 50%Fair Motl West Removetl as.Jan,2020. 11. Various X 3.8 3.8 Purple Robe locust Robinla'Purple Robe' 19110 85/55 59%Fa1r Poor to Motl elev. Removed as of Jan,2020. 115] X 2.9 2.9 Purple Robe locust Robinla'Parple Robe' 15110 75/60 66%Fair Motl Wast Removetl as&Jan,2020. A siz�e 1158 X 0.1 0.1 Purple Robe locust No-'Purple Robe' 18112 00/60 60%Fair antl fen Removetl as o(Jan,2020. feet. 89 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Name L $ o i 2 y++ v 'c w c P.H WLCA Notae from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon rc r c y n - + Common Name o n c - o. r n m g �_ Ratings 8 NOTES 201] x E N r n c c c c c c _m„ x w.c (Genoa,aPeuea) a: m mow c ^ u S,nng 2p15 Survey Sggme qpa .Faw g Ypc ._ ONWARD dEEo = E' 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'E�o3 go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ 02 & uf5$ 'a ¢c4 o°wn a8 ¢''c aS uO�Ex pr 1 Purple Robe lacuat obinia Purple Robe' 20/18 Mo 80%Gaatl Gaatl Removetl as o(Jan,2020. 6 8-ring pear Pyrus calleryana 1N8 25125 25%Very Removetl as of Jan,2020. Poor 0.1 8-ring pear Pyrus calleryana 1.s SOI50 50%Fair Motl Removetl as o1 Jan,2020. 1162 X 0.1 4.1 8-ring pear Pyrus calleryana 1310 40140 40%Poor Poor Removetl as o1 Jan,2020. 1- X 3.8 3.0 8-ring pear Pyrus calleryana 1310 00180 00%Gaatl Gaatl Removetl as o1 Jan,2020. 11W X 5.1 5.1 Purple robe locust Pobinia'Purple Robe' 3.22 75155 63%Fair Motl 0to 6fiet Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1168 X 5.4 5.4 Purple robe locust Robi -Purple Robe' 30120 00160 75%Gaatl Gaatl 1 to 5fiet Removetl as o1 Jan,2020. 1166 X 5.3 5.3 Purple robe locust Robi -Purple Robe' 30120 00160 64%Fair Gaatl O to)feet Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1167 X 2.8 2.0 -ring pear Pyrus calleryana 016 40140 40%Poor Poor Remavetl as o1 Jan,2020. 116. X 5.1 5.1 8-ring pear Pyrus calleryana 15112 60160 60%Fair Gaatl Removetl as o1 Jan,2020. 116. X 0.] 4.7 Purple robe locust Pobinia'Purple Robe' 25110 05165 74%Gaatl Gaatl Removetl as o1 Jan,2020. 117o X 0.] 0.] Purple robe locust Pobinia'Purple Robe' 23115 00165 70%Gaatl Motl Removetl as o1 Jan,2020. 1171 X 5.2 5.2 Purple robe locust Pobinia'Purple Robe' 27116 05160 70%Gaatl Gaatl At l5fiet Removetl as of Jan,2020. 90 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA oc + E+ E c f z a x' S.W.M.Nama L $ o f 2 8+- y+ e C H WLCA Nobs from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon rc r c y n - + Common Name o n c - n >, n m g �_ Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 x E N r n c c c c c c _m„ a w.c (Genoa,aPeuea) a: m mow c - c a ^ u Spring 2p15 Survey +u � iF mia v�`m ?c4 �a Sggme qpa .Faw g Ypc _ ns U� OL cs�o fr ._ ONWARD dE Eo = E' 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'E�o3 go as ide 1d �2.� nQ 20 02 & of 5$ .6 uO�'E 0 Purple robe locust binia Purple Robe' M. 75/60 69%Fair Gaatl west orTh west o Removetl as of Jan,MM. 3.2 fi-ring pear Pyrus calleryana 9I6 fi0/60 60%Fair Gaotl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 2.6 fi-ring pear Pyrus calleryana 9I5 30I30 30%Poor Poor Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1178 X 6.3 6.3 gowering pear Pyrus calleryana 23110 001]5 ]5%Gaatl Gootl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1176 X 0.9 4.3 gowering pear Pyrus calleryana 1]l12 fi5/65 65%Fair Gaotl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1177 X 6.3 6.3 Purple Robe locust Robinia Purple Robe' 35123 50/30 -A Poor Gaotl 0 to 15(eN Removetl as of Jan,2020. 117s X 5.1 5.1 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 33123 50/30 30%Poor Motl Oto 8 feet Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1179 X 3A 3.0 gowering pear Pyrus calleryana 12l] 40/40 40%Poor Poor[o Motl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1180 X 0.] 4.] Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 2N15 00/60 ]0%Gaatl Motl N0� Removetl as of Jan,2020. 11s1 X Ao 4.0 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 20114 ]0(r0 ]0%Gaatl Motl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 11s2 X &1 5.1 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 2311fi 05/60 ]0%Gaatl Gootl At 5 feat. Removetl as of Jan,2020. 11s9 X A8 4.0 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 22113 00160 6]%Fair Gootl -s- Removetl as of Jan,2020. 11N X 3.8 9.8 -ring pear Pyrus calleryana 1N9 50/50 50%Fair Motl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 91 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA S �S °c + E+ E c f z e x' S.W.M.Nama L $ o i 2 8+- y++ v 'c w c P.H WLCA Nofia from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon rc r c y n - + Common Name o n c - n r n m g �_ Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 x E N r n c c c c c c _m„ x w.c (Genoa,aPeuea) c a ^ u SPring 2p15 Survey +uE iF x x x i x x mia v�`m ?c4 �a Sggme qa .Faw g Ypc _ ns ONWARD dF,o�oEgo as ide 02 uO�Ex _ Fr .3 Dowering pear Pyrus calleryana 6/6 WSS 55%Fair Removetl as of Jan,2020AMEL 7 ] Dowering pear Pyrus calleryana 9l7 55155 7 Motl Removetl as o(Jan,2020. 3 3.3 Dowering pear Pyrus calleryana 9I8 35135 35%Poor Motl 0.4faet Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1188 x 5.5 5.5 Purple Robe locust Rohinia'Purple Robe' 28110 ]5/30 35%Poor Gaatl oto5faet Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1189 x 5.0 5.0 Purple Robe locust Robi-Purple Robe' 36122 65125 M%Poor Gaatl o to o feet Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1110 x 0.4 4.4 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 30110 50130 37%Poor Motl to Geetl At varloua Removetl as of Jan,2020. alev. 11a1 x 6.0 6.0 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 36123 65I20 35%Very Poor Gaatl 0 to 10 feet Removetl as o(Jan,2020. 1112 x 3.3 3.3 Dowering pear Pyrus calleryana 11I8 30I30 30%Poor Poor Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1- x 2.4 2.4 Dowering pear Pyrus calleryana 10l] 56165 M%Fair Poor[o Motl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 110r x 5.3 5.3 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 30I40 50I40 45%Poor Poor[o Motl 0to-teat Removetl as of Jan,2020. 119s X A5 4.5 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 25115 6.150 SM Fair Motl 3 to 4fiat Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1196 X 5.3 5.9 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 25I10 fi0135 40%Poor Motl 0.1 Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1197 X 5.0 5.0 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 2-10 55I30 37%Poor Motl 0 to 6fiet Removetl as of Jan,2020. 92 of 96 Valloo Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E o E c f z a x' S.W.M.Name y+ WLCA Notac from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon Ea& $'—rc r c y n — o Common Name o n c - n r n m g �_ Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 N r n c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genoa,aPeuea) a: m mow c — c a ^ u Spring 2p15 Survey +u � iF x x x i x x mia v�`m ?c4 �a Sggme qpa .Faw g Ypc _ ns Ui OL cs�o fr ._ ONWARD dEEo = E' 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'E�o3 go as ide �d �2.� nQ 2$ ¢c4 o°di n8 ¢m'c.A F,0i! pr 9 Purple Robe lacuat obinia'Pu I.Robe' 2V10 ems 45%Poor Motl o Removetl as o1Jan,2020. 6 1.1 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 21111 1-1 60%Fair Poor[o Motl Removetl as o1 Jan,MM. 6.3 4.3 Purple Robe locust No—'Pu IP Robe' 2]110 fi0135 40%Poor Motl O to 61eef. Removetl as o1 Jan,MM. 1W1 x 3.8 3.0 Purple Robe locust Rob—'Purple Robe' 22110 fi0160 60%Fair Poor[o Motl Removetl as of Jan,MM. 1.2 x 6.3 4.3 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Pu IP Robe' 25110 ]0160 66%Fair Motl Removetl as o1 Jan,MM. 120a x 5.0 5.0 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Pu IP Robe' 2.22 75135 45%Poor Gaatl 0to Staet. Removetl as o1 Jan,MM. 1204 x 6.6 4.6 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Pu IP Robe' 22116 55140 40%Poor Poor[o Motl ot.sl Removetl as of Jan,MM. 1208 x co 4.0 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Pu IP Robe' 2.20 SSI30 36%Poor Poor 0to Sfret Removetl as o1 Jan,MM. 1.6 x 5.2 5.2 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 33123 05160 60%Fair Gaatl Oto Bfaet Removetl as of Jan,MM. 120] x 6.3 4.3 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Pu IP Robe' 25120 05160 75%Gootl Gootl Removetl as o1 Jan,MM. 120s 1r 3.5 3.5 Purple Robe locust No—'Pu IP Robe' 2— BSI70 ]]%Gootl Gootl Removetl as o1 Jan,MM. 1209 1r 6.5 4.5 fi—ring pear Pyrus caReq— 15110 45145 45%Poor Motl Removetl as o1 Jan,MM. 1- X 9.0 3A fi—ring pear Pyrus caReq— 1.6 35135 35%Poor Poor Removetl as o1 Jan,MM. 93 of 96 RMI,g,&NOTES 2017 ONWARD IN 111111m on MENNEN im Vallw Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA v= E8E oc c 8 :: + E+ E c f z e x' Scientif Name L $ o i w++ v 'c m c C H WLCA Notae from URd,gd OVera11 ContlNlon E& $'-rc r c y n - o Common Name o n c - n >, w w g �_ Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 N rn c c c c c c _m„ +w.c (Genoa,aPm- a: m wow c - c a ^ m u SPring 2pt5Survey qun� iF x x x i x x mia ��`m r?c4 a Sgg�e Wpp Fa°w g Yc - nY U� ow ccw oI W8 ._ ONWARD 2 dE 2 2 2 2 2 2 E iZ'o °' ap io?e �d �L� n@ 2 '2 5 -of 2 ¢cq o°wLL o.8 �'cS OO�Ex' TREE REMOVED FROM FIELD. TREE REMOVED FROM FIELD. 1226 (Tree alreatly In this d..base as tloubleatem tree Gg#504.). 1.7 1.7 chi nM Nm IV/—P ndr,&CUN. 1418 War, 85%Gootl Gootl 1228 1.7 1.7 chi nM Nm IV/—P ndr,&CUN. 15/8 War, 85%Gootl Gootl 1229 1.8 1.8 chi.M.N. IV/—P ndr,&CUN. 15/8 War, 85%Gootl Gootl 1- 0.4 0.4 chi nM Nm IV/—P ndr,&CUN. 18/18 War, 84%Gootl Gootl 12e1 Est.22 Est.22 coast ratlwootl Sequoia.—Pe .- 85/18 50/50 50%Fair Poor to Motl 12e2 Est.24 Est.24 coast ratlwootl Sequoia serape mna MY40 35MIS 35%Poor Poor 1- ESL 18 ESL 18 coast retlwootl Sequoia serape mna 75MIS 41140 40%Poor Poor N.......trunk base.Tree was not tagged by WLCA 12. X ESL 15 Et.15 oast retlwootl Sequoia.—Pe mna 4SM3 GUS 65%Fair Motl This tree was"rough pl—d" by WLCA and added to the Santlls bee map sheets. 1- Est.22 Est.22 oast retlwootl Sequoia.—Pe mna 7SM3 55/55 55%Fair Poor to Motl Dense growth—d base. Two witle-Torketl cotlaninant mainabma ariw rt 16 firt 12a6 Est.26 Est.26 oast retlwootl Sequoia.—Pe mna 60/16 50/45 48X Poor Poorto Motl above gmtle. Dense growth am.d base. 95 of 96 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 7/10/2021 by WLCA + E+ E c f z a +' Sciantif Nama L $ o f 2 m+- y++ v 'c w e C H WLCA Nobs from UPtlatetl Overall ContlXlon x Es& $'-rc r$ y n - + Common Name o n c -m n n m g - a Ratings 8 NOTES 2017 y a r$a c c c c c c _m„ o w.c (Genoa,aPeuea) a: m mo w c - 'm c a ^ >, u Spring-5 Survey miaSggme qpaYppFc W ns U� EvL cs�o ft ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 n dZ'Ee3 go as ids �d �2.� nQ 2$ -'i +'2 & H121 + ¢¢qaw+ n8 ¢''c vS uO�Eo 1292 Est.20 Et.20 oast re —i Segrrola.—Pe .- 65/16 40/40 90%Poor Poor Dense g—h arcuntl bace. 1- Est.22 Est.22 oast re —i Segrrola.—Pe .- 68/16 swm 50%Fair Poo—Mod Dense growth am.d bace. 1229 ESL 15 Est.15 oast re —i Segrrola.—Pe .- 55/10 50/37 a1X Poor Poor East Dense growth am.d base. — Est.32 Est.32 coast retlwootl Segrrola serape .- M25 60/60 60%Fair Poo—Mod Dense gir—th am.d baw. Est.22 Est.22 oast re —i Segrrola wraps .- 50/15 45/45 45%Poor Poor Dense gir—th am.d baw. ESL 12 Est.12 oast re —i Segrrola wraps .- 50/12 60/50 55%Fair Poor to Mod Dense growth am.d base. — Est.24 Est.20 oast re —i Segrrola wraps .- 60/15 40/40 90%Poor Poor Dense growth am.d base. X 15.5 15.5 oast redwood Sequoia"'Mmm" 35/12 010 MDEAD Na madocarpus Tree removetl at Me flyway Vew pine croPhydla 10I6 britlge southwest corner on uzazozo. NOTES: 1.-91ts were d--inetl using a Nikon Forestry Pro 550 M1ypsOmeter.Diameters were dean inetl using a forestry D4ape which converts actual circumference to av—,d tliameter in inches antl ten-of inches. 2.In th original 2015 assignment,Walter Levison taggetl antl sury donly bees 4.0 incM1es diamwer antl greater(at 4.5 feet above gratle),using rountl-h dtags#1 Mrou91,#999.For tree tag numbers above#999,racetrack shapetl tags were usetl,up to tag#1125. 3.Trees#876 threugh#1105 were Imatetl in a triangular survey area known as"alternate lot west". 0.In a followup assignment in July,2018,Waher I---was di—d by Vallco Prmerty Owner LLC to tag antl assess additi.nal trees starting-1,tag of —many of which mea—d less than 4.0 incM1es tliameter.Most or all of these supplemental frees were eaclutletl from Me original tree etutly,tlue to trunk tliameter being below the swdy thresholtl of 4.0 inches,andfor I.A.of trunk outside-original proposetl Vallco project area. 5.P arking lot trees were inatalbtl in plastic root barriers wM1icM1 d—d lining tl trees by limiting their root,,ii m.Circular root barriers are conaitleretl by arboriM to be a tlirect uuce of Nck of normal tree growtli partamance antl tree aWbiliry. 6.Perimebr tress M1ave not been receiving mm�al irrigafim,antl are tleclining antl dying prematurey tlue to soil mdature tlefic#. 96 of 96