Loading...
DIR-2021-020 Action Letter CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308 To: Mayor and City Council Members Chairperson and Planning Commissioners From: Benjamin Fu, Director of Community Development Prepared by: Gian Paolo Martire, Senior Planner Date: October 21, 2021 Subject: Director's Minor Modification, DIR-2021-020, to allow the installation of three-antennas, in addition to the six-antennas existing, on a eucalyptus monopole tower at Cupertino City Hall located at 10850 Torre Avenue, APN 369-31-033. Chapter 19.164 of the Cupertino Municipal Code allows for administrative approval of minor changes in a project. The Director reports his decision to the City Council and Planning Commission in time to allow an appeal of the decision within 14 calendar days. BACKGROUND The applicant Eric Lentz, of Lentz Planning, representing Verizon, is requesting to add three antennas, in addition to the existing six antennas on a eucalyptus monopole tower at Cupertino City Hall. The approved total number of antennas would increase from six to nine. The monopole is located on the northeast corner of the City Hall property, adjacent to Torre Avenue.To the west of the property Offices,to the east are single-family homes (across Regnart Creek), and to the north are medium density townhomes. DISCUSSION The original cell tower was approved on October 6, 2015, by City Council for an Architectural and Site Approval (ASA-2014-10),Development Permit(DP-2014-07, and a Height Exception(EXC-2014-12) to allow a co-locatable cell tower with a height of 80 feet and antennas to be mounted at a height of no more than 66 feet. The structure was approved at 66 feet in height with six antennae.The proposal by Verizon is not increasing the height or size of the structure, rather only the number of antennae from six to nine. The applicant has submitted the application subject to Section 6409 of the Spectrum Act of 2012, as further described in the next page. 1 twenty feet, or more than the width of the tower structure at the level what was part of the original of the appurtenance, whichever is greater. For other eligible support approval. Thus,no protrusion of structures, it involves adding an appurtenance to the body of the the structure is proposed that structure that would protrude from the edge of the structure by more would exceed the allowances than six feet. listed. For any eligible support structure, it involves installation of more No cabinets are proposed to be than the standard number of new equipment cabinets for the added. technology involved, but not to exceed four cabinets, or for base stations,it involves installation of any new equipment cabinets on the ground if there are no pre-existing ground cabinets associated with the structure, or else involves installation of ground cabinets that are more than 10% larger in height or overall volume than any other round cabinets associated with the structure. It entails any excavation or deployment outside the current site. None proposed as no roundwork will be done. It would defeat the concealment elements of the eligible support The proposed work will have no structure. effect on the existing concealment. Please review the photo simulations (Attachment C) It does not comply with conditions associated with the siting approval The cell tower was approved of the construction or modification of the eligible support structure or with a Architectural and Site base station equipment, provided however that this limitation does Approval (ASA-2014-10), not apply to any modification that is non-compliant with the siting Development Permit(DP-2014- approval only in a manner that would not exceed the thresholds 07, and a Height Exception identified in (1) through (4)above.47 CFR 1.6100(b)(7)(i)-(vi) (EXC-2014-12). None of the proposed changes exceed the thresholds identified in 1-4 listed above. As demonstrated by the 6409 Checklist, the project is eligible as a streamlined facility. Radio Frequency A joint radio frequency (RF) energy emissions exposure report was prepared by Site Safe to analyze the cumulative RF energy exposure of the antennae (Attachment B). The calculated RF exposures at the exposure points of concern are as follows: 3 Cumulative Maximum RF Energy Exposures RF Exposure Location % of Cumulative Public Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) Limit Anywhere on ground level. <1% Street Light Level 24% The RF consultant notes that RF exposure can be significant around the antennas. The tower is inaccessible to the public,but the consultant recommends mitigation for wireless carrier technicians and maintenance staff who service the equipment to prevent occupational exposures above Federal standards. The consultant recommends explanatory signage at the base of the tower. The consultant also recommends appropriate RF safety training to include personal monitor use and lockout/tagout procedures for all personnel and contractors with rooftop access. The proposed wireless facility complies with the City's Wireless Communications Facilities Ordinance (CMC 19.136) and conforms with the City's Wireless Facilities Master Plan by locating wireless facilities on existing structures. ACTION The Director of Community Development deems the project categorically exempt from environmental review under CEQA Guidelines, Article 19, Section 15301: Existing Facilities and further deems the modification minor and approves the project with the following conditions of approval: 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on exhibits titled "Verizon/De Anza Stevens Creek (Antenna Mod) 10800 Torre Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014." prepared by Streamline Engineering and Design, Inc. consisting of 10 sheets labeled A-1 -A-5, S-1, and T-1 -T-4 and dated on 2/26/21, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. PREVIOUS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL All prior conditions of approval through past approvals shall remain in effect unless superseded by or in conflict with subsequent conditions of approval and as specifically amended by this Director's Minor Modification approval. 3. ACCURACY OF THE PROTECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations,building setbacks,property 4 size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 4. BUILDING PERMIT REQUIRED This approval does not constitute building permit approval; a separate building permit is required. 5. RF SAFETY MITIGATIONS RF Safety measures are required to protect the health of workers and contractors authorize to work on equipment located on the tower. Mitigation measures are detailed in the completed RF-EME Study completed by Telnet, Inc. and titled "DEANZA STEVENS CREE-E-CITY OF CUPERT" dated February 10, 2021. 6. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible for consulting other departments and/or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. 7. INDEMNIFICATION As part of the application, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the applicant shall agree to indemnify, defend with the attorneys of the City's choice, and hold harmless the City, its City Council, and its officers, employees, and agents (collectively, the "indemnified parties") from and against any liability, claim, action, cause of action, suit, damages, judgment, lien, levy, or proceeding (collectively referred to as "proceeding")brought by a third party against one or more of the indemnified parties or one or more of the indemnified parties and the applicant related to any Ordinance, Resolution, or action approving the project, the related entitlements, environmental review documents, finding or determinations, or any other permit or approval authorized for the project. The indemnification shall include but not be limited to damages, fees, and costs awarded against the City, if any, and cost of suit, attorneys' fees, and other costs, liabilities, and expenses incurred in connection with such proceeding whether incurred by the Applicant, the City, or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. The applicant shall agree to (without limitation) reimburse the City its actual attorneys' fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. Such attorneys' fees and costs shall include amounts paid to the City's outside counsel and shall include City Attorney time and overhead costs and other City staff overhead costs and any costs 5 directly related to the litigation reasonably incurred by City. The applicant shall likewise agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the indemnified parties from and against any damages, attorneys' fees, or costs awards, including attorneys' fees awarded under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, assessed or awarded against the indemnified parties. The Applicant shall cooperate with the City to enter a Reimbursement Agreement to govern any such reimbursement. The Applicant shall agree to (without limitation) reimburse the City for all costs incurred in additional investigation or study of, or for supplementing, redrafting, revising, or amending, any document (such as an Environmental Impact Report, negative declaration, specific plan, or general plan amendment) if made necessary by proceedings challenging the project approvals and related environmental review, if the applicant desires to continue to pursue the project. The Applicant shall agree that the City shall have no liability to the Applicant for business interruption, punitive, speculative, or consequential damages. 8. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions,pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. This Director's approval is effective October 21, 2021. The fourteen-calendar-day appeal period will expire on November 4, 2021. Enclosures: Attachment A: Plan set Attachment B: RF-EME Study completed by Telnet, Inc. and titled "DEANZA STEVENS CREE-E-CITY OF CUPERT" dated February 10, 2021. Attachment C: Photo simulations 6