CC 11-02-2021 Oral Communications_Late Written CommunicationsCC 11-02-21
Oral
Communications
Written Comments
1
Cyrah Caburian
From:Jennifer Griffin <grenna5000@yahoo.com>
Sent:Tuesday, November 2, 2021 6:20 PM
To:City Council
Cc:Jennifer Griffin
Subject:Trees on Lots from SB 9
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City Council:
How are we supposed to protect our street trees in our city from being cut
down from the shared driveway drama in SB 9? So we are supposed to
sacrifice our city street trees to the stupidity of the caprice of SB 9?
No way.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Griffin
1
Cyrah Caburian
From:Peggy Griffin <griffin@compuserve.com>
Sent:Tuesday, November 2, 2021 6:45 PM
To:City Council; Christopher Jensen; Greg Larson
Cc:City Clerk
Subject:2021-11-02 CC Mtg - Oral Communications
Attachments:Peggys Slides - ORAL COMMUNICATION.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Dear City Council, City Attorney and City Manager,
Attached are the slides I will be using during Oral Communications tonight.
Sincerely,
Peggy Griffin
This map is from the General Plan
Figure LU-2 COMMUNITY FORM
DIAGRAM
Q1: What justification was used to
ignore ALL the existing GP Goals,
Policies, Strategies and Land Use
Definitions?
TARGET EXPRESS SITE: In the ASA Building 6 – 21,000 sq ft “Major Retail”
RESOLUTION NO. 12-098
MAIN STREET PROJECT
TARGET EXPRESS SITE: In the ASA Building 6 – 21,000 sq ft “Major Retail”
“Sold” to the public, especially those close by,
as a place to by groceries or maybe a pharmacy.
Q1: Is a banquet hall being considered?
Q2: If so, does total restaurant space exceed 40% of the retail space?
Q3: If so, has there been a “subsequent parking and traffic analysis” done
as specified in Item 9 of this resolution?
Q4: If so, where are the documents?