U-1997-06 (Mod)b - Oak Valley DevelopmentSeptember 28, 1998
Steve Zales
O'Brien Group
2001 Winward Way
San Mateo, CA 94404
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
FAX (408) 777-3333
Community Development Department
SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION LETTER - Application 6 -U -97(M)
This letter confirms the decision of the Planning Commission, given at the meeting of
September 28, 1998, approving a use permit modification to allow additional housing
types in neighborhoods 1 and 4 of the Valley Oak Development (former Diocese
property), according to the enclosed copy of Planning Commission Resolution No. 4966.
Please be aware that an appeal of this decision can be made within 14 calendar days of
the decision. If this occurs, you will be notified of a public hearing which will be
scheduled before the City Council.
Sincerely,
�f ze e
Ciddy Wordell
Community Development Department
Enclosures
Resolution No. 4966
g1planning/post hearingtaction 1etter6u97m
6
City Hall
10300 Toile Avenue
1' + Cuertino CA 95014-3255
P
Telephone: (408) 777-3223
C1TfO FAX: (408) 777-3366
CUPE-kTINO
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK.
To: Plamiing Department
From: Grace Johnson, Deputy City Clerk
Subject: 02-Z-01 and 06-U-97, 23657 and 23667 Black, Oak Way, Brian Kangas Foulk
Date:- January 21, 2004
Rezoning and modification of a use permit to change approximately 3,000square feet from the Forum property
P (Institutional) to Oak Valley properties P (Residential). APPLICATIONS' 02-Z-01, 06-U-97 (M), Brian
Kangas Foulk, located at 23657 and 23667 Black Oak Way. A Negative Declaration is recommended because
the project will not have a significant impact on the environment and this item is recommended for approval.
First reading of Ordinance No. 1880: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Rezoning
3,220 Square Feet of Forum Property From P (Institutional) to P (Residential) for.23657 and 23667 Black Oak
Way.
The City Council made the. following action:
Approved the application and conducted the --first reading of ordinance. The second reading was conducted on
May 21, 2001:
t ill / -- -
Grace Jolulson
Printed on Recycled Paper;
06 -U -97(M)
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 6090
-OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL, OF A USE PERMIT TO TRANSFER 3,220 SQUAME FEET OF THE
FORUM PROPERTY TO 23657 & 23667 BLACK OAK WAY.
SECTION L• FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit,
as described on Section II, of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of
the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on the subject
application; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support this application, and has
satisfied the following requirements:
1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity; and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general
welfare, or convenience;
2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino
Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this title.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, 'facts;. exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this
matter, the application for a Use Permit is hereby recommended for approval; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and
contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application No. 06-U-97 (M) 'as setforth"in the Minutes
of the Planning Commission Meeting of April 9, 2001, are incorporated by reference as though fully set
forth herein.
■
Resolution No. 6090 06-U-97 (M) April 9, 2001
Page -2-
SECTION II: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Application No: 06-U-97 (M)
Applicant: Brian Kangas Foulk (for Al Powell and Donald Kretsch)
Location: 23657 & 23667 Black Oak Way
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBIT
Recommendation of approval is based on Exhibit B, Zoning Plat Map, dated 2/16/01.
2. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT
A lot line adjustment shall be submitted to and approved by Cupertino staff.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of April, 2001, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission
of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll callvote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Corr, Patnoe, Chen, Auerbach and Chairperson Kwok
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
/s/ Steve Piasecki /s/ Patrick Kwok
Steve Piasecki Patrick Kwok, Chair
Director of Community Development Planning Commission
g:/pd1eport/res/r06u97(M)
fe
CUPEkTINO
February 8, 2001
Cupertino Planning Commission
City Hall
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Re: Tree removal application 06 -U -97(M)
Dear Commissioners,
OM the City Attorney
10320 S. De Anza Blvd., Suite 1D
Cupertino, CA 95014
Telephone: (408) 777-3403
Fax: (408) 777-3401
Charles T. Kilian
City Attorney
Eileen H. Murray
Assistant City Attorney
After reviewing the City's terms of the tree protection bond in condition #4 of
application 47TM-97 and subsequent documents regarding the protection of the particular
tree in question located at 23 595. Oak Valley Road, and assuming the tree removal and
replacement will occur as per the January 8, 2001 Planning Commision approval of
application 06 -U -97(M), itis my opinion that there is no basis, in this instance, for the
City to collect on the O'Brien Group bond.
O'Brien Group records indicate that they made every attempt possible to protect
the tree and discourage building in the area.
it appears that damage to the tree was an unfortunate accident, perhaps due to an
error in an arbonst's judgment, which does notinvolvethe O'Brien Group. The
homeoWners,I, Mr. and Mrs. Law, have accepted responsibility and will replace the tree
per your direction at their own expense.
Sincerely,
V
Eileen H. Murray
Assistant City Attorney
Cc, Ciddy Wordell, City Planner
January 9, 2001
Mr. and Mrs. Kirk Law
23595 Oak Valley Road
Cupertino, CA 95014
SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION LETTER — 06 -U -97(M
This letter confirms the decision of the Planning Commission, given at the meeting of
January 8 2001, approving a use permit modification to remove a eucalyptus tree
protected as part of the O'Brien Group (Oak Valley) development, according to the
enclosed copy of Planning Commission Resolution No. 6074.
Please note that an appeal of this decision can be made within 14 calendar days of the
decision. If this occurs, you will be notified of a public hearing, which will be scheduled
before the City Council:
Sincerely,
Vera Gil
Senior Planner
Enclosure
Resolution No. 6074
g:/planning/post hearing/actionletterMu.97m
Printed on Recycled Paper
,{
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
-
(408)777 .3
FAX (408) 777-3333
PE QT
Community Development Department
January 9, 2001
Mr. and Mrs. Kirk Law
23595 Oak Valley Road
Cupertino, CA 95014
SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION LETTER — 06 -U -97(M
This letter confirms the decision of the Planning Commission, given at the meeting of
January 8 2001, approving a use permit modification to remove a eucalyptus tree
protected as part of the O'Brien Group (Oak Valley) development, according to the
enclosed copy of Planning Commission Resolution No. 6074.
Please note that an appeal of this decision can be made within 14 calendar days of the
decision. If this occurs, you will be notified of a public hearing, which will be scheduled
before the City Council:
Sincerely,
Vera Gil
Senior Planner
Enclosure
Resolution No. 6074
g:/planning/post hearing/actionletterMu.97m
Printed on Recycled Paper
06 -U -97(M)
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION 6074
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A
REQUEST TO REMOVE .ONE EUCALYPTUS TREE FROM A SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.
SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.: 06 -U -97(M)
Applicant: Kirk and Sheray Law
Location: 23595 Oak Valley Road
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application to
removal one specimen size tree and replace it with other trees, as described in this Resolution;
and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and
has satisfied the following requirements:
1) The tree, due to root damage, can cause significant damage to the residence and is a threat to
the health, safety and welfare of the applicant.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted
in this matter, application for Tree removal is hereby approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are
based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application 06 -U -97(M), as set
forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of January 8, 2001, are incorporated
by reference herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS:
Approval for the removal of one 150 -inch circumference Eucalyptus tree from the eastern
backyard of the property is permitted.
Resolution 6074 06 -U -97(M) 01/08/01
Page 2
,2. REPLACEMENT TREE:
Three 48 -inch box Coast live oalc trees in the backyard of the subject site. The City
Attorney's office shall evaluate whether the developer, the O'Brien Group, can be held
responsible for the tree removal and replacement of the trees. If the developer can not be. held
responsible, the applicant will be held responsible for the removal and replacement of the
subject tree. The replacement trees shall be planted within three months of the removal of
the Eucalyptus tree.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8t1i day of January 2001, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS: Doyle, Kwok, Stevens, Chairperson Harris
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS: Corr
ABSTAIN:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
/s/ Steve Piasecki
Steve Piasecici
Director of Community Development
APPROVED:
/s/ Andrea Harris
Andrea Harris, Chairperson
Cupertino Planning Commission
\\NTMAINSERVER\groups\Planning\PDREPORT\RES\06-U-97(M) res.doc
6 -U -97(M)
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 4966
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A USE PERMIT MODIFICATION TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL HOUSING
TYPES IN NEIGHBORHOODS 1 AND 4, TO CLARIFY MAXIMUM HEIGHTS IN
NEIGHBORHOODS 2 AND 3, AND TO MODIFY GRADING IN NEIGHBORHOOD 2
SECTION I: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received application for a Use
Permit Modification described in Section II. of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public
hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and
has satisfied the following requirements:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in
this matter, the referral is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this
Resolution beginning on page 2 thereof, and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are
1 based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application 6-U-97 (M) set forth in
the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of, September 28, 1998, and are incorporated
by reference as though fully set forth herein.
SECTION II: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.: 6-U-97 (M)
Applicant: Steve Zales/O'Brien Group
Location: Valley Oak Development (former Diocese property)
South of I-280, west of Foothill Boulevard and Rancho San Antonio
County Park and Stevens Creek Boulevard
Resolution 4966 6•U97(M) September 28,1995
Page2
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Grading for Lots 1 through 5 shall be as shown in Exhibit B, and shall replace sheet 11 of the
approved grading plans.
2. Exhibit 14A: Maximum Height
Neighborhood 2 Neighborhood 3
2.20 Height (maximum from proposed 30 feet30 feet'
lot elevation)
Footnote' The maximum building height for single story/split level houses is 23 feet. Any
i height over 20 feet shall have varied roof forms.
3. Exhibit 15A: Architectural Design
1. Stvle
• Minimum of 70% Craftsman, Prairie, Cottage, farmhouse, Shingle and Carpenter Gothic
styles
• Maximum of 20% Bungalow, Spanish, Spanish Villa, Spanish Eclectic, Monterey Colonial
• Maximum of 10% Timbered Cottage and Country Manor
• Maximum of 15 lots in areas 1 and 4 may have styles different from the above styles. The
proposed homes in this category shall receive Architectural and Site Approval from the
Planning Commission.
• Architectural styles shall be carefully grouped in order to achieve diversity and avoid
-� monotony
2. PREVIOUS APPROVALS
Previous conditions of approval not in conflict with these modifications shall remain in
affect.
3. NOTICE OF FEES DEDICATIONS RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount
of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are
hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees,
dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section
66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -day period complying with all
of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such
exactions.
Resolution 4966 6-U97(M) September 28,1998
Page3
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of September, 1998, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Doyle, Mahoney, Stevens and Chairwoman Austin
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Harris
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
/s/ Robert S. Cowan
Robert S. Cowan, Director
Director of Community Development
g/planning/pdreport/res/607m
APPROVED:
/s/ Donna Austin
Donna Austin, Chairwoman
Cupertino Planning Commission
P U 5 L I C 0 P I! N S P A C d
GRAPHIC SCALE
Sao 0 500 Too
giftn Kangas Faulk
L 0 S A T 0 S
A C e
EIGH50RHOOD
ck�
LU
a -
P U 5 L I Cqnj �13 lea
0 P e N 5 P A C E st",
ni
cost
OAK VALLEY 212 ACRES
CUPER"PNO, CALIF—ORNIA
JUNE 1998
�r TME c- -N '1� F,111 5
0V,`ELCPER & BUILDER: THE O'BRIEN GROUP
Q�.csM s" 11. k. A D _11 -LE V3'f.E%'
w w.bcynetcom/cbrlen
T H Z P 0 R U 4
R A N C n 0 a A N A N TON 1 0
MA
R 'r K N 0 L.
NEIGHBORHOOD 71
14 A R y
INEIGHBORHOOD
S AL TO
H I L L 5
MIZ
R A N
C H 0 9 A NA N T 0 R
N C H 0 S A N
A N T a MK0
C 0 U N T Y p A R K
c 0 U N T y
P A It K
P U 5 L I C 0 P I! N S P A C d
GRAPHIC SCALE
Sao 0 500 Too
giftn Kangas Faulk
L 0 S A T 0 S
A C e
EIGH50RHOOD
ck�
LU
a -
P U 5 L I Cqnj �13 lea
0 P e N 5 P A C E st",
ni
cost
OAK VALLEY 212 ACRES
CUPER"PNO, CALIF—ORNIA
JUNE 1998
�r TME c- -N '1� F,111 5
0V,`ELCPER & BUILDER: THE O'BRIEN GROUP
Q�.csM s" 11. k. A D _11 -LE V3'f.E%'
w w.bcynetcom/cbrlen
i
Na
yYv
Rt:
\\ `♦I\ \\ \\L ♦?\ \\. 1/" ' \ S4 \,, :
\. \•—
II\APPRO
`•,
�I—
Pfaiting
446
SiC.A¢u:, 4—w_5.0.
te44'
.
_ f
`\
SWZYQ.
wOYC\ m;
2+00
11
WAY /a
A
UA RYe
^0w
T
�, I^/O :� Q` • O
Oa
RZ u u
is
44
p _ r
•52
45J
07
HAMOND WA
In
0\
T�l
........... DAYLIGH
.39 . iYE------
Ll
-14
DRIVE
�Ri�
L3 STO
- UJ
.4,14
------------ 9s
0
EXHIBIT B
APPROVED
446
4\
10
i Fes.
0
EXHIBIT B
APPROVED
AREA
Living: 8,739
Garage: 498
Total: 3,887
DIOCESE OF SAN JOSE: PROPERTY
212 ACRES ; CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'®RIEN=GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
PLAN 1 6/9/97
iia„ , p_o,
0 a' a' w
FIRS' FLOOR
MOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO. CALIFORNIA
THE 4'5klf!N GROUP
PACIFIC f EWNSULA ARCHITECTURE
SECOND FLOOR
PLAN 2
AREA
First Floor Living, 3,424
Second Floor L1Vj4q iM
Total Living: 2,999
Gerege• S,86
Total: 2,479
aroiev
0 2' o' e•
FIRST FLOOR
MOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
292 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
SECOND FLOOR
PLAN 3
1/411 - l..0m a/W/Bi'
AREA
First Floor Living: 9,790 •'8,730
Second Floor Llyling' 9 326.9 3WW
Total Living: 3,036.3,080
t9araaa: 480
Total (average): 3,642
0 2' 4' a'
OPTIONAL LIBRARY/OFFICE
AREA
Fina Floor Living: 3,270 - 2,280
Second Flookj4.ving: 1,005.1,098
Total Living: 9,275 - 9,290
Garaaa� Sao
Total.(Avorag5): 31865
MOME OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BR1EN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
FIRST FLOOR PLAN 4
van o p -p" 8/9/87 0 2' a• 8'
MOCESE OF SAGO JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACMES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'®RIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
SECOND FLOOR PLAN 4
o r a a
AREA
First Floor Living: $,798.1,770
second FloorLivina:4. N'rias
Total Living: 3,316.3,370
arag0 263
Total (average): 3,00$
MOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO. CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
FIRS' FLOOR
PLAN 5
1/4e a 1'-0" 9/9/8Y
0 x a' w
SECOND FLOOR
DIOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIf--N WROMP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
SITTING OPTION A
MASTEA aEDROOM
SITTING OPTION B
SITtm
P.—Ace MABM MMOGM
SITTING OPTION C
PLAN 5
1/411 - J. -on 0/0/97
AREA
First Floor Living: 8,046
Second Floor Livinq' 1.560
Total Living: 9,606
Garages -62
Total (average): 4,999
D10"CESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'6RIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE FIRST FLOOR PLAN
PLAN 8
vas' .� r-a� eider
CAME ROOM
OPTION
CAME ROOM /
3 CAR GARAGE
OPTION
DIOCESE OF SAKI JOSE PROPERTY
292 ACRES CUPERTINO. CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN-GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
SECOND FLOOR PLAN PLAN 6 U 2' Ws
1/411 a p'o" Wo/87
AREA
Rear Unit
Finst Floor Living: Bag
Second Floor Living: 798
Total Living: 1.425
Ggrago: 917
Total: 1.742
Front Unit
First Floor Living: 64S
3acond Floor Livina• 798
Total Living: 1,441
!garage: 317
Total: 1,758
Combined Dupleat
Total Livings 2,866
GBPAe@a--------- 634
Total, 3,500
DIOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
ee•-o•
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
M
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
B.M.R. o r W a•
1/4" - 1'-O° 6/9/97
RL
DIOCESE OF SAINT JOSE PROPERTY
Cupertino, no, (CaRifo °arms
HOUSE STYLE DESCRIPTIONS
BUNGALOW
This is an eclectic style that was an American favorite from the late 1800's through the 1930's. One or two storied, the homes were typically smaller in size and
commonly featured front gables; dormers, stucco walls, and small arched porches with curving roofs.
CARPENTER GOTHRC
A variant of the Victorian house, this rural style is a close relative of the Farmhouse and commonly used for that purpose. ]Like the Farmhouse, steep multiple gables,
wood siding, and large porches are quite common. But unlike its simple counterpart, the Gothic house was usually embellished by the occasional pointed arched windows
and a variety of decorative gable trim. The style derives its name from a new method of lightweight framing invented by carpenters of the era which allowed such homes
to be erected much faster than heavy timber construction.
COTTAGE
The American cottage is more of a vernacular term than a defined "style". Although most consider a cottage to be a simple dwelling, the fact remains that cottages were
built throughout the 1800's & early 1900's in many sizes, shapes, and styles. Forms and roof shapes varied widely, as did the choice of materials—wooden facades were
just as common as stucco or stone. Overall, the cottage is recognized as an informal building type that borrowed elements from Craftsman, Bungalow, Spanish and other
such relaxed styles.
CO>(JN'd']I1;ZY MANOR
Common throughout the English countryside and transplanted here in United States, this style, with its front facing symmetrical gables, steeply pitched shingled roof,
stucco walls, bay windows, and scaled down porch, is easily recognizable a classic country house.
CRAFTSMAN
This style sprung from the Arts & Crafts movement of the 1890's and featured rustic textures, wood or stucco walls, lower pitched roofs, broad eaves, and front gables
and dormers that usually included decorative beams or brackets.. Porches supported by tapered square columns are also common for the style.
FARMHOUSE
An American original, the Farmhouse finds its roots in Eastern Colonial,Georgian, and Victorian architecture. Semi -steep roofs, front facing gables, wood siding, and
inviting full-length porches are the most common elements of this most rural of styles.
MONTEREY EY cCO LONIIAIL
This two-story style inmost recognizable by the cantilevered porch that spans across the front facade. Named after Monterey, the "colonial" capital of California, the style
is characterized by low-pitched tiled roofs, stucco exterior, and heavy timbered details.
PRAIRIE
This style, usually associated with Frank L,lyod Wright, is characterized by shallow -pitched hipped roofs, very wide eaves, stucco walls, unique window design, and long
porches supported by massive columns. Detailing of the facade is arranged to emphasize horizontal lines.
SHINGLE
An offshoot of the Craftsman style, these homes feature many of the same elements but are typically asymmetrical and sided with wood shingles to accentuate their rustic
flavor.
SPANISH & SPANISH VILLA
Common throughout the American southwest and all of California, the Spanish style features Mediterranean influences such as tiled roofs, porches with arched
colonnades, stucco walls, heavy wood doors and ornamental ironwork. The Spanish Villa is a formalized, two -storied rendition of the style while the one story version is
typically L1 -shaped and referred to as the "Californian Ranchos" during the 1800's. which later evolved into what we know today as the "ranch" house.
SPANISH ECLECTIC
Also common throughout California, this style is similar to Spanish but more noted for its arched feature windows, arched doorways, asymmetrical facade, and
combination of gabled and hipped roofs.
TIMBERED COTTAGE
-This style is reminiscent of the early American cottage that was characterized by steeply pitched roofs, multiple front facing gables and/or dormers, multiple paned
windows, and stucco walls. The half-timbering, also found in Tudor homes, is a common feature in such rural homes whose informal appearance differs from the
traditional Tudor style house which was typically grander in nature.
Sources:
American ]House Styles, by John Milnes Baker, A.I.A.
A Filed Guide To American House, By Virginia & Lee McAlester
The American House, by Mary Mix Foley
(FRONT ELEVATION
SNAKE ROOF
OR VINYL WINDOWS
W 90R
SHINGLES
DIOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN ORO. UP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
SHINGLE STYLE Plan 1
va- r -o" 6/9/97
0 2' q' g'
HEAR ELEVATION
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
D MCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO. CALIFORNIA
THE O'®RIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
SHINGLE STYLE Pi®n 1
1/41-. a p -p" 6/6/67
WOOD OR VINYL WIND
ASPHALT COMP R
DIOCESE OF SAKI JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
STU
U't6UM u tLEVATIOM
PRAIRIE STYLE Baan 1
1/4" - 1'-0" a/O/RY
0
MOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
"F-mn r.L.CV AE JUN
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION -
PRAIRIE STYLE Plan 1
1/4" J. -O., 8/9/97
FRONT ELEVATION
CEMENT VILE ROOF
STUCCO -
WOOD OR VINVL
REAR ELEVATION
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SPANISH ECLECTIC STYLE Plan I
THE O'BRIEN GROUP va-- - r -o'. eieier
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
0 2' 4' 0'
WOC
SnAK
WOOD OR VINYL WI
WOOD SH
.—. u --a— LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
oo.e ---U ¢_a.cvMu uvn9 i REAR ELEVATION
MOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
292 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
SHINGLE STYLE
1/411 a p-Ou
Plan 2
S/®/87
0 r c w
BRACKETS
SHAKE HOOF
WOOD OR VINVL WINDOWS
FRONT ELEVATION LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
MOCESE OF SAKI JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE OBRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
REAR ELEVATION
I
CRAFTSMAN STYLE Plan a
_ 1/4°. 0 1'-0" 8/9/87
0 r w e•
TILE ACCENT
ASPHALT CODAP ROOF
WOOD OR VIHVL WINDOWS
STUCCO
FRONT ELEVATION
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
IJ �
NilsM
,3� p
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
DIOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
REAR ELEVATION
STI VLE Flan 2
iia" , X1.01- sieier
SHAKE HOOF
WOOD TIMBERS
WOOD OR VINVL WINDOWS
STUCCO
FRONT ELEVATION
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
DIOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
REAR ELEVATION
TINSERED COTTAGE STYLE Plan 2
1/4" - 1'-O" 6/9/87
0 7 a' e'
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
wool
)n VIM
woo
FRONT ELEVA700H
nv_muro cu.cno-auuvav LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
DIOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA SHINGLE STYLE PI®n 3
THE O'BRIEN GROUP va = r -o eieier
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
o Y a• e•
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
S
WOOD On VINY
WOOL
FRONT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
MOCESE OF SAID JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE, O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
CRAFTSMAN STYLE Plan 3
1/4" - P-0° 6/9/07
FRONT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
MOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
LEFT SIDE ELEVATIONS
ALONG STYLE
van a p.pu
Plan 3
6/9/97
0 2' 4' v
r
WOOD on VIM
WOOD
i
ry Ju
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
FRONT ELEVATION
REAR ELEVAT90 N
MOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES, CUPERTINNO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
TWERED COTTA STYLE Plan 3
1
/4 a 1-0" 6/9/97
WOOD
at
WOOD OR NIPM
WOOD
MOCESE OF SAID JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
FRONT ELEVATION
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
SHINGLE STYLE Plan 4
1/41- a J. -O'. 0/9/07
0 r 4' , v
REAR ELEVATION
��
t❑t n �
��_ 11lIMI
`IIIIWYYYYWYYI"
_
Hill,
no
Li I--
im
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
MOCESC OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
SHINGLE STYLE Plan 4
1/4 - _ r -o" 0/9/or
0 Y' 4' 0'
ASPHALT COW
WOOD OR VINYL W
MOCESE OF SAID JOSE PROPERTY
292 ACRES CUPERTINfO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
FRONT ELEVATIONS
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
PRAIRIE.STYLE Plan 4
va" = r -D" 6/9/97
REAR (ELEVATION
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
! MOCESG OF SAID JOSE PROPERTY
I 212 ACMES CUPERTINO. CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
PRAIRIE STYLE Plan 4
1/4'- - 1'-O° 6/8/07
0 r e w
WOOD Hu 1 -
CEMENT TILE
WOOD OR VIHVL WINI
ST
FRONT ELEVATION
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
MOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO. CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
SIh�9SaI STYLE elan 4
tia^ = r-o�� eieilly
0 2' 4' If
REAR ELEVATION
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
DIOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
I
SPANSH STYLE Plan 4
vat- - r -o" 6/9/07
it Iii
allillllllllmi1l I: E11111111111111111111
1111111111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII'1
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION LEFT SIDE ELEVATION — -
DIOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPER
212 ACHES CUPERTINO. CALIFORNIA SISI Va.LA STYLE PI®n 6
THE O'BRIEN GROUP va^ - r -a" scsiw
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE 0 a' a s
FRONT ELEVATION
--------- WOOD ORVIRVL WINDOWS
- ---- STUCCO
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
MOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
292 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
MONTEREY COLONIAL STYLE Pion 5
1/411 - 1'-0° 6/8/67
0 7 a' 9
SBS
WOOD
WOOD
WOOD OR VINYL
DIOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
292 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
FRONT ELEVATION
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
SHINGLE STYLE Plan 0
vat- - r-Ou 6/9/97
- ll�lll�l
tIItI
t,t
4 , I '15545it'i --- -. - 1`t'r'r't't5445'I ','t 15't55 t't5 t 't't'I't'ft5' 14tii'i'i '15',5
I�Illt ytl,� �Illlll lll!'1'ItI1tItItltli yl� I I I t l t 11I I l I l l l t l I I I I I I I 1 11 1
I11 1111111 „ Iltillll II It'111 lilirlltl 11 II111II IIII
tt ttttirl Il,,,,i ttr, It _ tI ,r' 1 It tt t tttl tt Itt,
lis' 1111 1101111 1111 ffltlll I t II, 5111
II,I ._. 5,t ,tltliitttti,ll I, 1�t1, tttt I,St,yr,55't 15iyiri t 1 �- ' t I 1
li,� 5't't5144' i5',5't'ftt5', ,5,,554't t5tl
I'1'lll I15 ..III It III , �, t5tl � 1
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Iiltl 11111 111 111 II W19 ® � t(tt ® Il, It ltl I i
II'IIIIIIIIItIIlttI111tIt1tltllltltltltllllltltltlllllllllllllllllllrlll ,Iltll 11'11 15 r15111ItIil � Ii11IIIII1llltlll 11 �I
[illll 11 111 111 ]11111 IIIIIIIIIIIIII II III 11 , �rtt1l , ll(IIIII ;1. .
11111 t'I II II II II II II IIII II11IIti, Till til �If II I fll !, )'1111� 111 I
111tllttltti5ttlllltlillttlttlltlltltitIlli,tll,lillltt5111ltllitttitl, iltt,l Itttll Ill Itt„51t t'IT1T5['I'Il ll i`.
fI11tIIlllllfflllll Itttll III1 till Ill l5 _. II tt Jtelt t4�Ift',I'1r,, 15'>< I't I t 1, tl I II111 11
tIi'itili'iliili'i t'I't''li'il;'i'iii'ililili'itililii'i'ilii''tir't1 1tiltl III t :. �, l 1 „il I,1tIf 1 t,lllt li 1 II' Itlt�lr�t4i, r'r�4i,4 fi�5i tt�t�rt,li Ilt�l i , y, t , t
REAR ELEVATION
RIGHT SIDE iELEVATIONI
DIOCESE OF SAKI JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO. CALIFORNIA
THE OIBRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
SHINGLE; STYLE
vall , V -01 -
Plan B
6/9/97
o
ASPHALT COMP RO
STUC
WOOD OR VIHVL WIHDO'
S71
DIOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
282 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
FRONT ELEVATION
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
COTTAGE STYLE pten 6
vy-- a j .O , 0/9/97
REAR ELEVATION
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
MOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
M2 ACHES _CUPERTINO. 'CALIFORNIA COTTA STYLE Plan 6
THE O'BRIEN GROUP ua' = r -o" 6/9/97
0
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE z a e
SHA
WOOD
WOOD On VINYL
DIOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
FRONT •ELEVATION
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION
COTTAGE STYLE Plan 6
1/411 a 1,_0n 6/8/07
0 Y a' D'
3F' ILL ii
r Li r
REAR ELEiiON
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION
MOCESE OF SAKI JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE VBRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
TWIBERED COTTAGE STYLE Plan e
1/411 a P_p" 6/9/98
m
RIGHT SIDE (ELEVATION REAR. ELEVATION
i DIOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
292 ACRES CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
SPANISH STYLE �tww
1/4° a 1r.0n
•
WO
WOOD OR
(;®WAGE STYLE
1/411 - 1'-011
OARAO@ SET
BACK 4':0
DIOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
292 ACRES CUPERTINO. CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
3 -Car Garage Option
SHINGLE STYLE
1/4" - 1'-0"
Plan 9
3/26/97
Plano 2
Be/9r
IF ro
AML
0 7 4' 9
WOODS
wool
WOOD OR VIN.1
woo
WVVV Y6
WOOD SHAT
WOOD an
WOOD OR VINVL W
3-Cer Garage Option
SHINGLE STYLE Plan 3
1/4" - V -O" 3/26/97
MOCESE OF SAN JOSE PROPERTY
212 ACRES: CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
THE O'BRIEN GROUP
PACIFIC PENINSULA ARCHITECTURE
3 -Car Garage Option
SHINGLE STYLE Plan 4
1/4" - V-011. 6/9/97
0 Y e 6'
!JN
414 aAi I .
C a I l l
l -
d:._
°:. '.",� .�.::.' ( 1� ix �`0•s� _. l emelt'.'-��'"' � � ®{a�,l'� x
q j! S R
I � fy r � _VI✓' ! Ai
`f ; :S✓'� { _ � 'tee �i- %.� `- _ �=1�-+��unw-:� ..:c.-: a
Razw
WF
001,
r
t :s,' ✓•+ Y yc. ,�� � -""` e� �m i�� .. s -'R � � tis _
� iA.
,
y�gum
a' � T"'`• �_ -_. rta�ti � 9 � f =i-§.� �� ���Jy;�j"y'c' �J
n
w
,
f.
r,
ACA
e
1
•
it•re MI6 _ .F�l
':.d.-� . �:i7q'L•�1rt [� _ �� _ , k'�..=s. "- l ,,moi. _ --`a`:
n
icy `ice".
---
i
MP
ass's
r.
.s
wry �-.r•:�x �
- t
ti
a
i-
s _
go
C � _
r
_
r.
c g '
� l
r
err d
-- _ tr•: _ -�, _ BSS a
F � �-..A� .. } v� tom. :,: a "-ab ,`.�•�� r,`?, �' - T`�."...' _ � ..j +$F r k.. - 1
77,
Ad
e_
it � ._. .':. •. t. � :� � � CT �i
(t
i y
O�W N
Y' p`g v;� � � s •fs •f I I ,`OF
'� :rte" __�� T :i -- - `-^� • _ �-� «�+ -
low
IQ
zi
1101
( �• {§ SSI ��`� I _ 4p p
r
J.
Ai f A �it� .
J
t _
.i ani Y s _ _ •. ♦_' � Nfi�l G' • � �Y t! : " ^ ��"�(SjrF'��� � �
Y'J 4
ta
} 1
•
1 '
7
gJ1
.,
ip
AMR
71 ? t F� - � 1)�, N L :�£{3t5YrisW`i6Re „v-, ._��. - - - .. _ _. ._bq � 4' ,'r -,�•'T v
11tv it ILtea � � �y =�sim
Jil in, Vi
'y
r-
9qW
T1 I {
r l-. •..
.,,� :: _
� _ f,., ,
Was
i -
,�.
Lr _
0
• Y
t• fi
�.�,. _
x,� ,�,
.r
h
I
STs, 1
yy x.
1lip
At-
BMW
t
;3,~ _ - ... _.. __tom;• �i • ',+E � •_l; ,e _ �.-
.."ilk r . .: '•r _. ._..... .. •,-
- r t
w „ r
CW