CC 09-16-02 AGENDA
CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL ~ REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING
CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~ REGULAR MEETING
CUPERTINO PUBLIC FACILITIES CORPORATION ~ SPECIAL MEETING
10300 Torre Avenue, City Hall Council Chamber
Monday September 16, 2002
6:45 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ROLL CALL
STUDY SESSION -4:30 to 5:30 p.m.- Conference Room C
1. Conduct a joint study session with the Planning Commission regarding the Cupertino
Town. Center.
RECESS
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - 6:45 p.m. - Council Chambers
ROLL CALL
CEREMONIAL MATTERS ' PRESENTATIONS
2. Proclamation for Jerry Kayser in recognition of his lifesaving aid to a motorist in distress.
3. Proclamation for Michael Gottwald in recognition of his support for community activism.
4. Proclamation for the Cupertino National Little League Champions, the Cardinals.
5. Proclamation for the Cupertino National Little League 11-year old Tournament Team.
6. Proclamation for the Cupertino National Little League Major All-Stars.
POSTPONEMENTS
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the council on any matter
not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most eases, State law will
prohibit the council from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda.
September 16, 2002 Page 2
Cupertino City Council &
Cupertino Redevelopment Agency
CONSENT CALENDAR
Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff or a member of
the public, it is requested that items under the Consent Calendar be acted on simultaneously.
7. Approve the minutes from the September 3 City Council meeting.
8. Adopt a resolution accepting Accounts Payable for August 30 and September 6,
Resolution Nos. 02-162 and 02-163.
9. Adopt a resolution accepting Payroll for September 13, Resolution No. 02-164
10. Accept the Treasurer's Budget Report - July 2002.
11. Review and approve year-end close 2001/02 budget adjustments.
12.
Approve the destruction of records from the City Clerk files, which are in excess of two
years old, Resolution No. 02-165.
13.
Adopt a resolution making determinations and approving the reorganization of area
designated "San Femando Avenue 02-02", property located on the north side of San
Fernando Avenue between Orange Avenue and Byme Avenue; approximately 0.228 acre,
Liu (APN 357-15-039), Resolution No. 02-166.
14.
Amend Resolution No. 02-065, which established a Cupertino Teen Commission, to set a
limit of one term, Resolution No. 02-167.
15.
Approve a fee waiver request in the approximate amount of $14,833 for the Moon
Festival of Silicon Valley's event scheduled for September 21 and 22, 2002, at Memorial
Park.
16.
Accept improvements: Peizhen Zhang and Xiao-Bai Gu (grading and street), 21905 San
Femando Avenue, APN 357-15-046; William Joseph Choe (grading, street
improvements, street lights), 10388 Byme Avenue, APN 357-14-032. (No
documentation in packet).
17.
Accept city projects performed under contract: Foothill Boulevard Bicycle Facility'
Improvements Project, Project No. 9448 (Republic Electric). (No documentation in
packet).
18.
Accept improvement agreement: Gholamreza Javanmard and Ezat Loukzadeh, 10071
Orange Avenue, APN 357-16-029, Resolution No. 02-168.
19.
Accept quitclaim deed: Gholamreza Javanmard and Ezat Loukzadeh, husband and wife
as community property with right of survivorship, 10071 Orange Avenue, APN 357-16-
029, Resolution No. 02-169.
September 16, 2002 Page 3
Cupertino City Council &
Cupertino Redevelopment Agency
20.
Accept grant of easement, roadway: Gholamreza Javanmard and Ezat Loukzadeh,
husband and wife as community property with right of survivorship, 10071 Orange
Avenue, APN 357-16-029, Resolution No. 02-170.
21.
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement
between the City and The Guzzardo Partnership, Inc., for the design and construction
administration of the City Center Park (Four Seasons Comer), for a fee not to exceed
$101,500, and authorize the Director of Public Works to execute up to an additional
$15,000 of additional services, as may be required to complete the work, Resolution No.
02-171.
22.
Adopt a resolution authorizing -the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement
between the City and artist Roger Berry for the design, fabrication, and installation of a
piece of public art at the City Center Park (Four Seasons Comer) called "Perspectives",
for a fee not to exceed $143,788, Resolution No. 02-172.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
23.
Approve applications U-2002-03, EXC-2002-04, EA-2002-05, CTC Funding, LLC
(Cupertino Town Center) located at the Southwest comer of Rodrigues and Torte
Avenues), APN (s) 369-40-017 and 369-40-002. (This item was continued from August
19th):
a).
c).
Grant a Negative Declaration
Approve an application for a Use Permit to demolish two office buildings (for a
temporary parking lot) and construct a 28,000 square foot, two-story office
building and a 2,500 square foot commercial building
Approve an exception to the Heart of the City Specific Plan to increase the height
of an office building from 36' to 45'
24.
Approve applications MCA-2001-04, EA-2002-10 for amendments to Chapter 19.84 of
the Cupertino Municipal Code and other sections of the code, if needed, related to
changes to Second Dwelling Unit Regulations, City of Cupertino located Citywide.
a).
c).
Grant a Negative Declaration
Conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 1901: "An Ordinance of the City
Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 19.84, Second Dwelling
Units in R-1, RHS, A and A-1 Zones, of the Cupertino Municipal Code."
Approve the applications
September 16, 2002
Cupertino City Council &
Cupertino Redevelopment Agency
Page 4
PLANNING APPLICATIONS
25.
Request to initiate revisions to Chapter 10.48 (Noise Ordinance) of the Cupertino
Municipal Code regarding home maintenance activities, City of Cupertino located
Citywide.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
26. Approve items for the Cupertino Public Library and Civic Center Project:
a).
Receive a status report on the project design of the Cupertino Public Library and
Civic Center Project
b).
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute an
agreement between the City and Nova Partners for the construction management
services on Civic Center Project, for a fee not to exceed $850,000, and authorize
the Director of Public Works to execute up to and additional $75,000 of additional
services, as may be required to complete the work, Resolution No. 02-173
c).
Adopt a resolution authorizing and directing the preparation and execution of
certain lease financing documents, authorizing the preparation and distribution of
a preliminary official statement in connection with the offering and sale of
Certificates of Participation relating thereto, and authorizing and directing certain
actions with respect thereto, Resolution No. 02-174
The City Council meeting recesses and the Public Facilities Corporation convenes.
PUBLIC FACILITIES CORPORATION MEETING
ROLL CALL
A. Adopt a resolution approving, authorizing and directing the preparation and execution of
certain lease financing documents and authorizing and directing certain actions with
respect thereto, Resolution No. 02-001. (This item is related to No. 24 (c), offering and
sale of Certificates of Participation.
ADJOURNMENT
The Public Facilities Corporation adjourns and the City Council reconvenes.
NEW BUSINESS - continued
27. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a contract with Apple Computer,
Inc. for the disposal of consumer electronics products and computers (e-waste) in an
September 16, 2002
Cupertino City Council &
Cupertino Redevelopment Agency
Page 5
amount not to exceed $25,000 and authorize funding for the contract from the Resource
recovery Fund in the amount of $25,000, Resolution No. 02-175.
28.
Discuss maintenance at the Loree Center, 10029 Judy Avenue and consider an application
for Alcoholic Beverage License, Loree Liquors, 19050 Stevens Creek Boulevard.
29.
Review development regulations affecting Randy Lane and Larry Way Neighborhood (Al
Zoning District) and conduct the first and only reading of Ordinance No. 1902: "An
Interim Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Title 19 of the
Cupertino Municipal Code by Adopting Interim Measures to Immediately Rezone
Approximately 9.7 Acres, Consisting of Sixty-Eight Single-Family Residences, from A1-
43 Agricultural-Residential Zone to the P(A1) Planned Development Zone with
Agricultural-Residential Intent and Declaring the Urgency Thereof."
30. Consider canceling the meeting of January 6, 2003.
31.
First reading of Ordinance No. 1903: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino Authorizing an Amendment to the Contract Between the City Council of the
City of Cupertino and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees'
Retirement System to enhance 1959 survivor benefits."
ORDINANCES
STAFF REPORTS
32. Receive informational report on weekly recycling service options and costs.
COUNCIL REPORTS
Mayor Richard Lowenthal:
Economic Development Committee
North Central Flood Alternate
Northwest Flood Alternate
Public Dialog Consortium
Santa Clara County Cities Association
Santa Clara County Cities Legislative Alternate
Santa Clara County Library Joint Powers Authority
Toyokawa Sister City Alternate
Valley Transportation Authority Policy Advisory Committee - Alternate
West Valley Mayors and Managers
September 16, 2002
Cupertino City Council &
Cupertino Redevelopment Agency
Page 6
Vice-Mayor Michael Chang:
Audit Committee
Leadership Cupertino
Legislative Review Committee
Library Steering Committee
Public Dialog Liaison
Santa Clara County Housing and
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Alternate
Santa Clara County Library JPA Alternate
West Valley Mayors and Managers Alternate
Councilmember Sandra James:
Association of Bay Area Governments
Economic Development Committee
Environmental Review Committee Alternate
Library Steering Committee
Skate Park Committee
Santa Clara County Emergency Preparedness
Santa Clara Valley Water Alternate
Councilmember Patrick Kwok:
Leadership Cupertino
Library Steering Committee Alternate
North Central Flood Zone
Northwest Flood Zone
Santa Clara Valley Water
Santa Clara County Cities Alternate
Skate Park Alternate
Toyokawa Sister City
Councilmember Dolly Sandoval:
Association of Bay Area Governments (ABA) Alternate
Audit Committee
Environmental Review Committee
Legislative Review Committee
Santa Clara County Cities Legislative Review
Santa Clara County Emergency Preparedness Alternate
Santa Clara County Housing and
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Valley Transportation Authority Policy Advisory Committee
CLOSED SESSION
Pending Litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9(a), City of Cupertino vs.
International Disposal Corporation (IDC), California, case #CV793115.
September 16, 2002
Cupertino City Council &
Cupertino Redevelopment Agency
Page 7
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to a meeting on September 23 at 4:00 p.m. in the City Hall lobby to meet the van for a
tour of Stevens Creek Trail. A hearing to review the Stevens Creek Trail feasibility study will
follow at 7:00 p.m. in Conference room C.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
Canceled for lack of business.
CITY OF
CUPE INO
DRAFT MINUTES
CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL
Regular Adjourned Meeting
Tuesday, September 3, 2002
ROLL-CALL
City Council members present: Mayor Richard Lowenthal, Vice-Mayor Michael Chang, and
Council members Sandra James, Patrick Kwok, and Dolly Sandoval. Council members absent:
None.
Staff present: City Manager David Knapp, Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood, City
Attorney Charles Kilian, Community Development Director Steve Piaseeki, Parks and
Recreation Director Therese Smith, Public Information Officer Rick Kitson, Public Works
Director Ralph Quails, and City Clerk Kimberly Smith.
At 4:30 p.m. Mayor Lowenthal called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300
Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California.
STUDY SESSION - 4:30 p.m.
Review the Sports Center ADA (American with Disabilities Act) upgrades and functional
area program as depicted in the Schematic Design drawings.
Parks and Recreation Director Therese Smith distributed an exhibit showing a more
current layout, which was slightly different than the one printed in the council packet.
She said the first floor of the Sport Center building would include a reception area, tennis
office and shop, child watch area, fitness center, and restrooms. The lower floor will
have racquetball courts, a multipurpose room/gym which can accommodate badminton,
six table tennis tables, or a basketball hoop; a meeting room, staff offices, and kitchenette.
There will also be a new teen area, which will include a study room, lounge, games area,
and restrooms. It will have its own entrance, and a door to the Sports Center, which can
be closed and locked. She distributed a chart, which listed the functional areas by square
footage.
Mr. Mark Schatz, Field Paoli Architects, said this program had evolved through a series
of meetings with the staff from both the facility and from Parks and Recreation
administration. He discussed the changes that will be made to address ADA requirements,
including an inside elevator, accessible restrooms and showers, improved staircases, and
the addition of ramps and signage. There will also be seismic upgrades and
improvements to electrical and mechanical systems.
September 3, 2002 Cupertino City Council Page 2
Sandoval suggested that there be bicycle racks for the entire facility as well as a storage
area for skateboards at the teen center.
Parks and Recreation Coordinator Richard Gonzalez discussed the current staffing of the
Sports Center and said they did not anticipate hiring any more city employees.
Smith distributed a chart illustrating racquetball usage over the last eight months.
Discussion followed regarding the apparent under-utilization of racquetball courts. Smith
explained that the racquetball courts could be used for other purposes such as table tennis,
but it would be necessary to change the ventilating system because it is currently strong
enough to blow the table tennis balls around. Schatz explained that the racquetball courts
could not be merged into the multipurpose room because of the impact on space
requirements for restrooms and corridors.
Planning Commissioner Taghi Saadati suggested that the proposed climbing wall be
installed on the outside of the building. He also asked that the locker room floors have
linoleum instead of carpeting.
Sherry Geddes, a resident in the Commons neighborhood, thanked the council and staff
for listening to and addressing the concerns of the residence. She recommended that the
teen center not have regular access to the Sport Center. She also asked whether the Teen
Center spaCe would be available for the community when the teens are in school.
James asked whether the weight training facilities could be made available for high
school students.
Kwok suggested that next year the Council consider charging higher fees for
nonresidents, because the residents will bear the costs of these improvements.
Chang asked if there would be specific times when the racquetball courts can be used for
other purposes. Lowenthal suggested that the council have a more in-depth discussion at
another time regarding programming and marketing this facility.
Public Works Director Ralph Qualls said that the budget is $2.4 million for design and
construction.
RECESS
Council recessed from 6:08 to 6:48 p.m.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
At 6:48 p.m. Mayor Lowenthal called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300
Torte Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance.
September 3, 2002 Cupertino City Council Page 3
ROLL CALL
City Council members present: Mayor Richard Lowenthal, Vice-Mayor Michael Chang, and
Council members Sandra James, Patrick Kwok, and Dolly Sandoval. Council members absent:
None.
Staff present: City Manager David Knapp, Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood, City
Attorney Charles Kilian, Community Development Director Steve Piasecki, Parks and
Recreation Director Therese Smith, Public Information Officer Rick Kitson, Public Works
Director Ralph Qualls, and City Clerk Kimberly Smith.
CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS
Present Proclamation for the Rangers, the Cupertino National Little League Tournament
of Champions.
3. Present Proclamation for the Cupertino National Little League Junior All-stars
Championship Team.
Mr. Bill Wilson, Little League president, thanked the city council for their support. He
presented a recognition plaque to Jim Farmer. Mayor Lowenthal presented proclamations
to the members of the Rangers and the Junior All-Stars.
4. Presentation by the County of Santa Clara on the Regional County Expressway Study.
Mr. Dan Collen, Project Manager, discussed the Comprehensive County Expressway
study. He said the purpose is to create a long-range strategic plan for the improvement
and maintenance of the expressways. He thanked the policy advisory board member
James and alternate Lowenthal for their work, as well as Public Works Director Ralph
Quails for his service on the technical working group. He said the next step would be a
series of community meetings, and a draft implementation plan will be presented to the
City Council early in 2003. Council members discussed the difficult transition between
Highway 280 and Lawrence Expressway, and the importance of addressing that as a part
of this report. Mr. Collen said that it was briefly mentioned in the summary regarding
Lawrence Expressway, but the problem is bigger than can be addressed with this project.
They are in working with Caltrans and other agencies for a broader solution on this
interchange.
POSTPONEMENTS - None
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None
CONSENT CALENDAR
September 3, 2002 Cupertino City Council Page 4
Sandoval/Chang moved to approve the items on the Consent Calendar as recommended, with the
exception of items 5 and 8, which were pulled for discussion. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok,
Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None.
Adopt resolutions accepting Accounts Payable for August 16 and August 23, Resolution
Nos. 02-156 and 02-157.
Adopt resolutions accepting Payroll for August 16 and August 30, Resolution Nos. 02-
158 and 02-159.
Adopt a resolution setting the date of October 7 to approve the reorganization of area
designated "Creston Drive 02-0Y', property located on the north side of Creston Drive
between Berkeley Court and Foothill Boulevard, approximately 0.541 acre, Johnson and
Whittaker (APN 326-12-062), Resolution No. 02-160.
10.
Accept improvements for grading and a retaining wall: Peter S. and Barbara K. Gwozdz,
10363 Byme Avenue, APN 357-12-031. (No documentation in packet).
11.
Accept city projects performed under contract: Safe Routes to Schools, Project No. 9541
(Republic Electric). (No documentation in packet).
12.
Review and reject the sole bid submitted for Portal Park and Wilson Park Improvements,
Project No. 2002-9119.
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above)
5. Approve the minutes from the August 19 City Council meeting.
Mayor Lowenthal reordered the agenda to consider adopting these minutes after item 13.
Later in the meeting, Kwok/Chang moved to adopt the minutes of August 31, as amended
to show Sandoval absent on item 19.B.2. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal.
Noes: None. Abstain: Sandoval.
Approve fee waiver request in the approximate amount of $125 for conference room
space at the Quinlan Center by the Santa Clara County Chapter of the California Grand
Jurors' Association.
The City Manager said that in the future, staff would begin recommending against
waiving fees. Mayor Lowenthal asked staff to bring a general policy recommendation to
Council for review.
James/Chang moved to approve this waiver. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok,
Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - None
September 3, 2002 Cupertino City Council Page 5
PLANNING APPLICATIONS - None
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
13.
Request by applicant to reconsider actions regarding City Council Resolution No. 02-154,
authorizing a public hearing to consider an amendment to the General Plan to increase
Residential Allocation by 170-300 units in the Heart of the City planning at the Hewlett
Packard site north of Stevens Creek Boulevard between Wolfe Road and Tantau Avenue
(APNS: 316-20-078/316-20-079/316-20-085), Application No. 2002-03, Resolution No.
02-161.
Discussion was held regarding Council's intent when adopting Resolution No. 02-154.
Lowenthal and James indicated it was their intention to authorize a public hearing, but
not to impose the conditions shown on Condition A at that time.
Sandoval/James moved to rescind resolution 02-154 and adopt resolution 02-161, which
would authorize a public hearing without imposing any conditions at this time. Council
directed staff to include discussion of the conditions when this item was next discussed at
a study session.
Kwok/Chang moved to adopt the minutes of August 31, as amended to show Sandoval
absent on item 19.B.2. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal. Noes: None.
Abstain: Sandoval.
14.
Approve the Sports Center ADA (American with Disabilities Act) upgrades and
functional area program as depicted in the Schematic Design drawings and as discussed
in the earlier study session.
Chang/James moved approval of the functional area program. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James,
Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None.
NEW BUSINESS
15.
Consider an amendment to Resolution No. 02-065, which established a Cupertino Teen
Commission, adding the phrase "Commissioners shall not serve consecutive terms."
James/Chang moved to amend the resolution to state that "Commissioners shall not serve '
consecutive terms unless there is a vacancy for which there is no eligible applicant, at
which time the City Council may waive the restriction."
16.
Schedule a special meeting for September 30, 2002 to review the Stevens Creek Trail
feasibility study.
Council set the special meeting for Monday, September 23. Council members will meet
in the City Hall lobby at 4:00 p.m. for an approximate 3-hour tour of the trail area. A
hearing will follow in Conference Room C of City Hall at 7:00 p.m.
September 3, 2002 Cupertino City Council Page 6
ORDINANCES
17.
Second reading and enactment of Ordinance No. 1899: "An Ordinance of the City
Council of the City of Cupertino Rezoning Approximately a 0.45-acre Lot From P(CN,
ML, Res 4-12) to P(CN, ML, BQ, Res 4-12) to Allow Quasi-Public Land Use Activities
at 10051 Pasadena Avenue."
The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. James/Sandoval moved to read the
ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the second
reading thereof. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok, Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None.
James/Sandoval moved to enact Ordinance No. 1899. Vote: Ayes: Chang, James, Kwok,
Lowenthal, Sandoval. Noes: None.
STAFF REPORTS
COUNCIL REPORTS
Council members highlighted the activities of their committees and various community events.
Council members concurred to set a closed session meeting on Monday, October 14, to conduct
an evaluation of the City Manager. The meeting will begin at 3:30 and will be held at the
Blackberry Farm Retreat Center, 21975 San Fernando Avenue, Cupertino.
CLOSED SESSION - None
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:20 p.m. Council adjourned to a study session on September 9 at 5:00 p.m. in Conference
Room C regarding office space allocation in the Heart of the City planning area at the Hewlett
Packard site.
Kimberly Smith, City Clerk
For more information: Staff reports, backup materials, and items distributed at the meeting are
available for review at the City Clerk's Office, 777-3223.
Televised Council meetings may be viewed live on Cable Channel 26, and may also be viewed
live or on demand at www.cupertino.org. Videotapes of the televised meetings are available at
the Cupertino Library, or may be purchased from the Cupertino City Channel, 777-2364.
DRAFT
RESOLUTION NO. 0 2-16 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS
AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING
AUGUST 30, 2002
WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated
representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the
availability of funds for payment hereof; and
WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows
the following claims and demands in the mounts and fi:om the funds as hereinafter set
forth in Exhibit "A".
CERTIFIED:
Director of Administrative Services
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 16tlltay of September ,2002, by the following vote:
Vote
Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED:
Mayor, City of Cupertino
08/29/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "08/26/2002" and "08/30/2002"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT C~CK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT
1020 595457 V 08/23/02 ME2003 KEVY, K~REN 5806449
1020 595550 08/26/02 1550 ADONIS L NECESITO 1103500
1020 595551 08/30/02 1695 3M 2708405
1020 595551 08/30/02 1695 3M 2708405
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595552 08/30/02 3 A RENTAL CENTER 1108505
1020 595553 08/30/02 2110 ABC BACKFLOW TESTING REP 1108408
1020 595554 08/30/02 29 LYNNE DIANE AITKEN 5706450
1020 595555 08/30/02 1884 ~J~BERTSONS-NORT~]~RNDIVI 1106342
1020 595556 08/30/02 2641 AMERICAN STEAM CLEANING 1108505
1020 595557 08/30/02 M ANDP, F_~ASEN, DEANNA 580
1020 595558 08/30/02 57 ARAMARK 1104510
1020 595559 08/30/02 61 ARTISTIC PLANT CREATIONS 1108501
1020 595560 08/30/02 2504 ANNE-LORRAINE BAHI. 5706450
1020 595561 08/30/02 968 BAP AI]TO PARTS 6308840
1020 595561 08/30/02 968 BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840
1020 595561 08/30/02 968 BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840
1020 595561 08/30/02 968 BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595562 08/30/02 M BAUER, STEVE 580
1020 595563 08/30/02 88 BAY AREA SHELVING INC 1108507
1020 595563 08/30/02 88 BAY AREA SHELVING INC 1108504
1020 595563 08/30/02 88 BAY AREA SHELVING INC 1108501
1020 595563 08/30/02 88 BAY AREA SHELVING INC 1108503
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595564 08/30/02 92 BEST OF COUPONS 5706450
1020 595565 08/30/02 M2003 BUDGET TRAVEL 5506549
1020 595566 08/30/02 874 C & N DISTRIBUTORS INC 1108408
1020 595567 08/30/02 124 CALIFORNIA SAFETY AND SU 1108303
1020 595568 08/30/02 1476 CANNON DESIGN GROUP 110
1020 595569 08/30/02 2232 CARIAGA, LOURDES 110
..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX
AQUATICS BBQ 0.00
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00
SUPPLIES 0.00
SUPPLIES 0.00
0.00
SUPPLIES 8334 0.00
BACK FLOW REPAIR 0.00
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00
SUPPLIES 25267 0.00
STEAM CLEAN KITCHEN 0.00
Refund: Check - SU~WER 0.00
COFFEE SERVICE 0.00
PLANTS POR CITY HALL 0.00
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR 0.00
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00
0.00
REFUNDS 165997 & 16599 0.00
UPRIGHT CROSS BARS 0.00
UPRIGHT CROSS BARS 0.00
UPRIGHT CROSS BARS 0.00
UPRIGHT CROSS BARS 0.00
0.00
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC 0.00
1 YR SUBSCRIPT/SPITSEN 0.00
SUPPLIES 8671 0.00
PARTS/SUPPLIES 8233 0.00
ARCHITECT REVIEW SERV 0.00
CSGARNS~T 0,00
PAGE i
AMOUNT
-80.71
382.50
58.46
438.41
496.87
99.90
250.00
150.00
14.56
800.00
47.00
533.24
58~.00
3,~.00
99.50
54.60
74.82
65.88
294.80
105.00
342.61
342.61
342.62
342.61
1370.45
1500.00
12.00
461.42
186.54
330.00
~'' 50
RUN DATE 08/29/02 TIME 14:11:33
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
08/29/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 2
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/03 Ct.I~CK RRGISTI~ - DISBUR~I~MI~ FUND
SF-X-~r"rION CRITRRIA: Cransacc.trans_date between "08/26/2002" and "08/30/2002"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT
1020 595569 08/30/02 2232 CARIAGA, LOURDES 110
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595570 08/30/02 1460 TONI CARREIRO
1020 595570 08/30/02 1460 TONI CARREIRO
1020 595570 08/30/02 1460 TONI CARREIRO
TOTAL CHECK
6104800
6104800
5606620
1020 595571 08/30/02 149 CASH
1020 595571 08/30/02 149 CASH
1020 595571 08/30/02 149 CASH
1020 595571 08/30/02 149 CASH
1020 595571 08/30/02 149 CASH
TOTAL CHECK
1101201
1101201
1104000
1104400
4239222
1020 595572
08/30/02 2739 C]~NTRAL COAST WILDS 4209116
1020 595573
08/30/02 155 C]~FI'RAL WHOLESALE NURSER 1108407
1020 595574
1020 595574
TOTAL CHECK
595575
08/30/02 1057
08/30/02 1057
08/30/02 1156
C~RIDIAN BENEFITS SERVIC 110
CERIDIAN BENEFITS SERVIC 110
CHA 110
1020 595576
08/30/02 983 CLARK'S MARl)WOOD FLOORS 4249210
1020 595577
1020 595577
TOTAL CHECK
08/30/02 192
08/30/02 192
CMC OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 1108201
CMC OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH 1104510
1020 595578
1020 595578
1020 595578
1020 595578
1020 595578
1020 595578
TOTAL CHECK
08/30/02 174 COCA-COLA 5706450
08/30/02 174 COCA-COLA 5706450
08/30/02 174 COCA-COLA 5706450
08/30/02 174 COCA-COI~A 5706450
08/30/02 174 COCA-COLA 5706450
08/30/02 174 COCA-COLA 5706450
1020 595579
08/30/02 ME2003 COIJ.,OTON, JUDY
5806349
1020 595580
08/30/02 916 COMPUTRR XTRAS XPRESS 6104800
1020 595581
08/30/02 M2003 CONSUMER REPORTS/TRAVEL 5506549
1020 595582
08/30/02 2704 BRIAN CORDIEL
5606620
1020 595583
08/30/02 197 CTC FUNDING, LLC 1101500
1020 595584
~ 595584
08/30/02 1058
08/30/02 1058
CUPERTINO COI~NITY SERV 1104000
CUPERTINO C~ITY SERV 1104100
..... DESCRIPTION ......
SSGARNSI~T
WEB UP-DATES THEN
W-~B UP-DATES 7/8-8/7
WEB SITE REVISIONS
~'*-z'~ CASH 8/20-8/28
~mu-~'f CASH 8/20-8/28
PETTY CASH 8/20-8/28
~-l-£f CASH 8/20-8/28
PETTY CASH 8/20-8/28
PRUCHASE PLANTS FOR SA
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 833
*FLEX DEP/240125
*FLEX HLTH/240125
CHA
SENIOR CI~R RECEFTIO
HEP B VACCINE
SD COLLECT/MIGLIACCI
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
PRE-SCHOOL SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
2 YRS SUBSCRIPT/SPITSE
SERVICE AGRI~EMENT FOR
RI~NT SEPT2002 70-1D-CU
CAROL ATWOOD
CAROL FERRELL
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
103.84
410.34
212.55
2187.90
22.75
2423.20
16.99
9.56
5.99
48.92
19.00
100.46
300.00
214.06
165.40
426.94
592.34
132.00
5735.00
70.00
20.00
90.00
184.70
374.30
305.90
305.90
382.30
358.20
1911.30
75.94
189.44
49.00
230.00
4341. O0
30.00
30.00
RUN DATE 08/29/02 TIME 14:11:34
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
08/29/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 3
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "08/26/2002" and "08/30/2002"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595585
08/30/02 194 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 1108303
1020 595586 08/30/02 198
1020 595586 08/30/02 198
TOTAL CHECK
CUPERTINO UNION SCHL DIS 5806449
CUPERTINO UNION SC~L DIS 1106343
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 5606620
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 5606640
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108506
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 5708510
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108314
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108303
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108504
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108507
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108503
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108505
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZASERVICES INC 1108501
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108502
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108509
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108504
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108302
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108504
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE i~NZA SERVICES INC 1108508
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108505
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108504
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108407
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108507
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108315
1020 595588 08/30/02 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108504
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595589
08/30/02 1242 DIGITAL PRINT IMPRESSION 1107301
1020 595590
08/30/02 220 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 5806349
1020 595591
08/30/02 233 ECONOMIC DRIVING SCHOOL 5806249
1020 595592
08/30/02 242 EMPLOYMENT DEVEL DEPT 110
1020 595593
08/30/02 243 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 110
1020 595594
08/30/02 261 FEHR & PEERS ASSOC INC 1108101
1020 595595 08/30/02 2469 FERRELL, CAROL 1104100
1020 595596
08/30/02 2304 FIELD PAOLI ARCHITECTURE 4269212
1020 595597 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 5806349
1020 595597 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BA~CARD 1106343
..... DESCRIPTION ......
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
JULY PRMT 13024
JULY PRMT 10969
JANITORIAL AUG2002
JANITORIAL AUG2002
JANITORIAL AUG2002
JANITORIAL AUG2002
JANITORIAL AUG2002
JANITORIAL AUG2002
SHAMPOO CARPET QUINLAN
JANITORIi~J~ AUG2002
JANITORIAL AUG2002
JANITORIAL AUG2002
JANITORIAL AUG2002
JANITORIAL AUG2002
JANITORIAL AUG2002
SHAMPOO CARPET QUINIJ~
JANITORIAL AUG2002
SPEC SERV QUINLAN CTR
SPECIAL SERV PORTAL PK
SPEC SERV SENIOR CTR
SPECIAL SERV MAY2002
JANITORIAL AUG2002
JANITORIAL AUG2002
JANITORIAL AUG2002
JANITORIAL AUG2002
B.CARDS/C.WORDELL
SUPPLIES 17551
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
SIT/932-0014-5
SDI/776-5260-0
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
DAYTIMER SUPPLIES
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
60.00
152.07
5.00
5.00
10.00
440.03
440.03
338.67
2466.56
4438.26
1479.42
100.00
138.20
1961.30
3451.80
2813.28
4111.39
1366.54
300.00
739.71
lb_ ~0
195.00
400.00
1004.89
2648.14
739.71
6097.32
35960.25
66.79
68.43
2925.00
17441.02
876.28
7813.02
44.35
12849.46
2026.88
RUN DATE 08/29/02 TIME 14:11:35
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
08/29/02 CTTy OF CUP~.TINO PAGE 4
ACCOUNTING P~-RIOD: 2/0~ (~*~"~ ~.~I.~T~ - DI~BU~T FUND
SF~-~CTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "08/26/2002" and "08/30/2002"
FUND - 110 - GENER~ FUND
CJ~H ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT
1020 595597 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 5806349
1020 595597 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1106100
1020 595597 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 5806249
1020 595597 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1106647
1020 595597 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1106265
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595598 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1108201
1020 595598 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1108503
TOTAL C~ECK
1020 595599 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1104300
1020 595600 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1108501
1020 595601 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 6104800
1020 595601 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 5606640
1020 595601 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 6109856
1020 595601 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1104000
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595602 08/30/02 2361 . FIRST BANKCARD 1108503
~ 595602 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1108504
595602 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1108501
1U~O 595602 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1108507
1020 595602 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 5708510
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595603 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1101200
1020 595603 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1103300
1020 595603 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1101000
1020 595603 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1101000
1020 595603 08/30/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 1108501
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595604 08/30/02 818 FLOYD D BROWN 6308840
1020 595605 08/30/02 1741 GOVCONNECTION, INC. 6104800
1020 595606
08/30/02 2046 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFIC 1104100
1020 595607 08/30/02 298 GRAINGER INC 1108504
1020 595607 08/30/02 298 GRAINGER INC 1108303
1020 595607 08/30/02 298 GRAINGER INC 6308840
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595608
08/30/02 301 GRAYRAR ELECTRIC CO INC 1108501
1020 595609 08/30/02 2546 GTM PLUMBING 1108505
595610
08/30/02 899 GUZZ~RDO & ASSOCIATES IN 4259313
..... DESCRIPTION ......
AU~2002 STATEMENT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
AU~2002 STATEMENT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
AU~2002 STATEMENT
AU~2002 STATEMENT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
AU~2002 STATEMENT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
AU~2002 STATEMENT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
AUG2002 STATEMENT
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES 15515
3 COPIES GUIDE/RETIREM
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
PARTS/SUPPLIES
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
SUPPLIES
TIME/MATERIALS
SERV FOUR SEASONS PK
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.OO
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1629.44
180.00
58.15
49.80
9.08
3987.27
307.29
82.75
390.04
29.40
386.18
274.71
45.95
1395.00
39.90
1755.56
84.39
77.82
12.10
119.58
86.60
380.49
290.50
397.86
425.00
425.00
219.20
1757.56
449.76
482.25
36.00
96.56
626.93
197.08
920.57
353.60
950.00
1487.75
RUN DATE 08/29/02 TIME 14:11:35
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
08/29/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "08/26/2002" and "08/30/2002"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT
1020 595611 08/30/02 1235 HIGHF~RK LIFE INSUR~tNCR 6414570
1020 595611 08/30/02 1235 HIG~K LIFE INSURANCE 110
TOTAL C~ECK
1020 595612 08/30/02 1898 HORIZON 1108303
1020 595612 08/30/02 1898 HORIZON 1108303
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595613 08/30/02 2027 [~I~.A HOVEY 1104400
1020 595614 08/30/02 2735 HUNTINGTON LEARNING CE~T 5806249
1020 595615 08/30/02 341 ICE CE~R OF CUPERTINO 5806349
1020 595616 08/30/02 343 ICMA RETIRE~NT TRUST-45 110
1020 595617 08/30/02 2528 INDOOR BILLBOARD 1108314
1020 595618 08/30/02 1981 INTERSTATE TRAFFIC CONTR 2708404
1020 595619 08/30/02 807 CT~a~RI~S KILIAN 1101500
1020 595620 08/30/02 376 ~ORR SYSTEMS INC 5606620
1020 595621 08/30/02 M KONANUR, LALITHA 580
1020 595622 08/30/02 2503 CURTIS KONNO 5706450
1020 595623 08/30/02 ME2003 LEVY, KAREN 5806449
1020 595624 08/30/02 M LEW, JLTDI 580
1020 595625 08/30/02 M LI, NING 580
1020 595626 08/30/02 1396 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 1104511
1020 595627 08/30/02 2583 LOWENT~, RICI~ARD 1101000
1020 595628 08/30/02 M Lederer, Lee 550
1020 595629 08/30/02 1698 MANPOWER INC 1104510
1020 595630 08/30/02 1378 RICARDO MARTINEZ 5706450
1020 595631 08/30/02 M2003 MATT OLSEN 5706450
1020 595632 08/30/02 1868 METRO MOBILE CO~ICATI 6309820
1020 595633 08/30/02 444 MINTON'S LUMBER 1108501
1020 595633 08/30/02 444 MINTON'S LUMBER 1108506
DESCRIPTION ......
LTD
LIFE/AD&/)
PARTS/SUPPLIES 52027
PARTS/SUPPLIES 52027
PLEXI GLASS/EOC
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
#1435946
*I(~A
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PI/RC
ADVTECH WATERBORNE WH
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
Refund: Check - SU~R
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
SUPPLIES
Refund: Check - SL~4ER
Refund: Check - SU~94ER
LEGAL SERVICES
MAYOR'S BREAKFAST
Refund: Check - Beach
K.MARTINEZ W/E 8/11
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
BROCHURE DESIGN
HEADSETS AND VOX SYSTE
PARTS/SUPPLIES 24324
PARTS/SUPPLIES 22475
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
PAGE 5
AMOUNT
6936.08
8730.16
15666.24
355.67
601.47
957.14
116.09
1351.00
116.25
5867.21
72.66
2511.40
32.00
23.20
150.00
80.71
65.00
35.00
2871.50
58.30
83.00
696.00
155.00
75.00
2095.72
42.29
RUN DATE 08/29/02 TIME 14:11:36
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
08/29/02
ACCOUNTINO PERIOD: 2/03
SFJ. m~TION CRITERIA:
CITY OF CUPERTINO
CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
transacu.trans_date between #08/26/2002" and "08/30/2002"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595634 08/30/02 2567 MISDU 110
1020 595635 08/30/02 466 MPA DESION 4209119
1020 595635 08/30/02 466 MPA DESION 4209119
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595636
08/30/02 475 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RE 1108314
1020 595637
08/30/02 302 NATIONAL DEFERRED COMPEN 110
1020 595638 08/30/02 2443 NEW HORIZONS 6104800
1020 595639 08/30/02 M2003 NUNES, MICHELLE 5806449
1020 595640 08/30/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1101201
1020 595640 08/30/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 5706450
1020 595640 08/30/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1107503
1020 595640 08/30/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1101201
1020 595640 08/30/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 5806249
1020 595640 08/30/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1107503
~ 595640 08/30/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 5806449
: 595640 08/30/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1107301
luau 595640 08/30/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1102100
1020 595640 08/30/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 5706450
1020 595640 08/30/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1107503
1020 595640 08/30/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 5706450
1020 595640 08/30/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1101201
TOTAL CRECK
1020 595641
08/30/02 494 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 1101500
1020 595642 08/30/02 501 OPERATING ENGINEERS %3 110
1020 595643
08/30/02 1805 0RP~UM THEATRE GROUP SA 5506549
1020 595644 08/30/02 507
1020 595644 08/30/02 507
1020 595644 08/30/02 507
1020 595644 08/30/02 507
1020 595644 08/30/02 507
1020 595644 08/30/02 507
TOTAL CHECK
DAN OSBORNE DBA:OSBORNE 1108503
DAN OSBORNE DBA:OSBORNE 1108504
DAN OSBORNE DBA:OSBORNE 1108503
DAN OSBORNE DBA:OSBORiTE 1108503
DAN OSBORNE DBA:OSBORNE 1108602
DAN OSBORNE DBA:OSBORNE 4209216
1020 595645 08/30/02 833
1020 595645 08/30/02 833
1020 595645 08/30/02 833
1020 595645 08/30/02 833
1020 595645 08/30/02 833
~ 595645 08/30/02 833
P E R S 110
P E R S 110
P E R S 110
P E R S 110
P E R S 110
P E R S 110
..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX
0.00
PB~E 6
AMOUNT
65.57
J TRYBUS 385960533 0.00 223.00
PROFESSIONAL SERV 0.00 0.44
PROFESSIONAL SERV. 0.00 28.99
0.00 29.43
RENTAL 8/01-8/28 0.00 91.63
*NAT'L DEF 0.00
0.00
TECETRAINING 8/19/02
16527.02
1999.00
LIFEGUARD CLASS 0.00 125.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 54.11
OFFICE SUPPLIES 17059 0.00 395.07
OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 246.01
RETURN #178995114001 0.00 -54.11
OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 79.81
OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 86.57
OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 27.71
OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 135.80
OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 140.68
OFFICE SUPPLIES 17057 0.00 304.48
RETURN %179300917001 0.00 -54.11
REF %177733572001 0.00 -32.46
OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 32.42
0.00 1361.98
OFFICE SUPPLIES 0.00 114.43
UNION DUES 0.00 601.02
UPGRADE SEATS 9/18 0.00
TIME/MATERIALS 0.00
TIME/MATERIALS 0.00
TIME/MATERIALS 0.00
TINE/MATERIALS 0.00
TIME/MATERIALS 0.00
TIME/MATERIALS 0.00
0.00
2270.00
690.47
565.59
388.24
423.67
185.00
445.93
2698.90
*PERS BYBK 0.00 327.28
PERS BUYBK 0.00 37.52
*PERS BYBK 0.00 180.14
PERS 1959 0.00 118.11
PERS EMPLY 0.00 25181.39
PEPS SPEC 0.00 178.17
RUN DATE 08/29/02 TINE 14:11:37
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
08/29/02 CI~ OF CUPERTINO PAGE 7
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/03 CHECK REGIS~'R - DISBURSE~ FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: ~ransac=.=rans_date between "08/26/2002" and "08/30/2002"
FU~ - 110 - GEITEP. AL
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
1020 595648 08/30/02 511
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WOP. LDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WOP. LDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WOP. LDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORI/)COM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WOR3~DCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL IWORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WOP. LDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM
PACIFIC BELL/WOPJ~DCOM
1106647
1104530
1108504
1108407
5606640
1106100
1106265
1106529
1106500
1107200
1107301
1107302
1107501
1107502
1107503
1108511
1108001
1108101
1108102
1106265
1108504
1108501
1106647
1107301
1108503
1108507
5606620
5706450
1108601
1108602
5208003
2308004
1106265
1108201
6104800
1106265
5606620
1104400
5708510
1101200
1101000
1102100
1101500
1104300
1103300
1103500
1104000
1104100
1104200
..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT
0.00 26022.61
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 28.43
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 199.00
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 31.38
TELEPHONE SERV JI]LY200 0.00 14.71
TELEPHONE SERV JLTLY200 0.00 28.43
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 85.29
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 454.86
TELEPHONE SERV J~JLY200 0.00 28.43
TELEPHONE SERV J~3LY200 0 . 00 341.14
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 85.29
TELEPHONE SERV JL~LY200 0.00 255.86
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 56.86
TELEPHONE SERV JTTLY200 0.00 369.57
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 28.43
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 113.71
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 56.86
TELEPHONE SERV JL~LY200 0.00 142.14
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 270.27
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 28.43
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 92.22
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 113.71
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 1
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 ~ ~6
TELEPHONE SERV JL1LY200 0.00 56.86
TELEPHONE SERV 07JLY200 0.00 770.13
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 56.86
TELEPHONE SERV JI]LY200 0.00 284.29
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 341.14
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 85.29
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 113.71
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 28.43
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 28.43
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 85.29
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 199.71
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 540.15
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 199 · 00
TELEP}{ONE SERV JI]LY200 0.00 142.14
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 85.29
TELEPHONE SERV J'dLY200 0.00 227.43
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 85.29
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 170.57
TELEPHOI~E SERV JL~LY200 0 . 00 142 . 14
TELEPHONE SERV J~Y200 0 . 00 312.72
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 256.36
TELEPHOI~E SERV JI]L¥200 0.00 56.86
TELEPHONE SERV JI3LY200 0.00 85.29
TELEPHONE SERV J~3L¥200 0.'00 85.29
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200 0.00 170.57
TELEPHONE SERV ~Y200 0.00 ~ ,29
RUN DATE 08/29/02 TIME 14:11:37
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
08/29/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 8
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/03 C~C]( REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FU~D
Sm~CTION CRI~"ERIA: transact.trans_~te k~tween "08/26/2002" and "08/30/2002"
FUND - 110 - GEI~R~ F~
CASH ACCT C~ECK NO
1020 595648
TOT;iL C~CK
1020 595649 08/30/02 1699
1020 595650 08/30/02 1699
1020 595650 08/30/02 1699
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595651 08/30/02 M2003
1020 595652 08/30/02 2616
1020 595653 08/30/02 520
1020 595653 08/30/02 520
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595654 08/30/02 1099
1020 595654 08/30/02 1099
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595655 08/30/02 M2003
595656 08/30/02 526
1U20 595656 08/30/02 526
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595657 08/30/02 533
1020 595658 08/30/02 536
1020 595659 08/30/02 541
1020 595660 08/30/02 M
1020 595661 08/30/02 1647
1020 595662 08/30/02 560
1020 595663 08/30/02 1976
1020 595664 08/30/02 '509
1020 595665 08/30/02 2400
1020 595666 08/30/02 2778
1020 595666 08/30/02 2778
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595667
ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT
08/30/02 511 PACIFIC BELL/WORLDCOM 1104510
PACIFIC GAB & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC CAS & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC C~ & EL4~C~IC
4209530
4209528
4209528
PACIFIC G]~ CONSTRUC 110
PACIFIC SURFACING INC 1108503
PAP~DIRECT INC 5806349
PAPERDIP~CT INC 5506549
PAVEMENT ENGINEERING INC 2709450
PAV~ ENGINEERING INC 1108601
PENINSULA C~TER OF ICC 1107501
PENINSULA DIGITAL IMAGIN 110
PENINSI/i~A DIGITAL IMAGIN 1108101
PERS LONG TERM CARE PROG 110
ANNE MARIE PETERSON 5806249
ROBIN PICKEL 5706450
PON, ~Y 580
POSTMJ%STER 1103400
PUBLIC DIALOG~ CONSORTI 1102401
PI~ONE & S~OMBERG 1104511
PW SUPEPJ~S INC 1106342
R E M INC 1108005
R/~ORFISH 6109869
RAZORFISH 6109869
08/30/02 944 P~ILITATION P~ESO~C~ 1104510
..... DESCRIPTION ......
TELEPHONE SERV JULY200
HONESTEAD/ELANEY
WOLFE/280 PR #9528
WOLFE/280 PR #9528
DEV. MAINT. REFUND
CONCRETE INSTALLATION
OFFIC~ SUPPLIES 17077
OFFICE SUPPLIES 16049
SERVICE ~/~REE~NT FOR
SERVIC~ AG]~E~ FOR
DU~S 7/1-6/30/03 CASTE
IMPRO%"EMENT PLANS
BMP SHEET
PERS LTC/#2405
SERVICE ~REEMENT FOR
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
Refund: Check - SUbTlER
SCF~NE SEPT,OCT,NOV 200
2001/02 BLK LF2%DER PRO
BIANCHI/CITY OF CT~PER
SUPPLIES
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
E-GO~ & PORTAL
E-GOVERNMENT & PORTAL
WORF.~TATION EVAL
SAL~S TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
AMOUNT
170.57
8587.19
2500.00
1000.00
1000.00
2000.00
2573.10
7443.00
35.93
143.08
179.01
28811.00
2590.00
31401.00
30.00
24.19
69.82
94.01
159.24
177.00
540.00
45.00
7594.50
20000.00
461.90
15.72
2034.78
75000.O0
75000.00
150000.00
297.03
RUN DATE 08/29/02 TIME 14:11:38
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
08/29/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 9
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/03 C~IECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "08/26/2002" and "08/30/2002"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO
1020 595668
1020 595668
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595669 08/30/02 2482
1020 595669 08/30/02 2482
1020 595669 08/30/02 2482
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595670 08/30/02 M2003
1020 595671 08/30/02 600
1020 595672 08/30/02 602
1020 595672 08/30/02 602
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595673 08/30/02 606
1020 595674 08/30/02 2506
1020 595675 08/30/02 621
1020 595676 08/30/02 258
1020 595677 08/30/02 1636
1020 595678 08/30/02 636
1020 595679 08/30/02 M2003
1020 595680 08/30/02 644
1020 595680 08/30/02 644
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595681 08/30/02 2076
1020 595682 08/30/02 2415
1020 595683 08/30/02 2629
1020 595684 08/30/02 2776
1020 595684 08/30/02 2776
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595685 08/30/02 1954
1020 595686 08/30/02 891
1020 595686 08/30/02 891
TOTAL CHECK
ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT
08/30/02 1071 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 2709448
08/30/02 1071 REPLJBLIC ELECTRIC 4209541
ROBERT HALF TEC"~NOLOGY 6104800
ROBERT I~ALF TECHNOLOGY 6104800
ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 6104800
ROMY'S DELIVERY SERVICE 1106265
ROTO-ROOTER SEWER SERVIC 5606620
ROYAL COACH TOURS 5506549
ROYAL COACH TOURS 5506549
JOYCE RUSSUM 5706450
DORIS SA~ 5706450
SAN JOSE MERCURY CLASSIF 5208003
SANTA CLARA COUNTY 110
SANTA CLARA C~ SHERIFF 1104510
SANTA CRUZ BOARDWALK 5806349
SCANDANAVIAN DESIGNS 1106265
SCREEN DESIGNS 5606620
SCREEN DESIGNS 5806349
SILICON VALLEY MAAKJFACTU 1101000
SIMON MARTIN-VEGUE WINKE 4239222
SHERRY WITT SNOW 5706450
SPEC 5 STEEL 4209216
SPEC 5 STEEL 4209216
SPHERION CORPORATION 1108201
JOAN SPITSEN 5506549
JOAN SPITSEN 5506549
..... DESCRIPTION ......
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
J.SEVERANCE W/E 8/02
J.SEVER~CE W/E 7/26
J.SEVERANCE W/E 8/09
DELIVERY 4 CHAIRS
TIME/MATERIALS
TRANSPORTATION 7/25
TRANSPORTATION 8/03
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
GARDE AD#S 50647/6034
V ORTEGA 563312780
FINGERPRINTS JULY2002
TRN 62859 8/16/02
4 OFFICE CHAIRS
SUPPLIES/T-SHIRTS
SUeR FINALE T-SHIRTS
REG R.LOWENTHAL 9/20
PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
WORK PIT RAIL
}{AND RAILS SERV.CTR.
NGHI T LA W/E 8/11
SUPPLIES
DINNER
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
AMOUNT
81811.80
103320.00
185131.80
1008.00
1008.00
1008.00
3024.00
50.00
107.00
639.90
602.57
1242.47
180.00
60.00
111.16
2
84.00
233.35
1511.17
1929.56
108.25
2037.81
95.00
158901.26
300.00
317.50
2540.00
2857.50
672.00
176.16
24.OO
200.16
RUN DATE 08/29/02 TIME 14:11:39
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
08/29/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/03 CI~CK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SF~ION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "08/26/2002" and "08/30/2002"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO
1020 595687
1020 595688
1020 595689
1020 595690
1020 595691
1020 595692
1020 595692
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595693
1020 595694
1020 595695
1020 595696
1020 595696
1~'"" 595696
I 595696
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595697
1020 595698
1020 595699
1020 595699
1020 595699
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595700
1020 595701
1020 595702
1020 595703
1020 595704
1020 595705
1020 595705
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595706
ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT
08/30/02 M2003
08/30/02 671
08/30/02 677
08/30/02 M2003
08/30/02 2559
08/30/02 695
08/30/02 695
SQJ DEVELOPMENT CO., INC 110
STANDARD BUSINESS MACHIN 1101500
STATE STREET BANK & TRUS 110
SUNSET MAGAZINE 5506549
SUPERIOR ALUMINUM BODY C 6308840
SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549
SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549
08/30/02 696 TADCO SUPPLY 1108504
08/30/02 2577 JIM TAORMINA 5506549
08/30/02 700 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108315
08/30/02 701 TARGET STORES 5806349
08/30/02 701 TARGET STORES 1106265
08/30/02 701 TARGET STORES 5806349
08/30/02 701 TARGET STORES 5806349
08/30/02 1794
08/30/02 1993
08/30/02 724
08/30/02 724
08/30/02 724
TMT-PATHWAY LLC 2708404
TREASURER OF A~DA COU 110
TURF & INDUSTRIAL EQUIPM 5606620
TURF & INDUSTRIAL EQUIPM 5606620
TURF & INDUSTRIAL EQUIPM 5606620
08/30/02 1154
08/30/02 738
08/30/02 M2003
08/30/02 18
08/30/02 765
08/30/02 774
08/30/02 774
UNITED WAY OF SANTA CLAR 110
VALLEY OIL COMPItNY 6308840
WASHINGTON MUTUAL 110
WASTE ORGANIZATION ADONA 1108005
DR CHI-HSUi D WENG 5706450
WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS 2708405
WESTERI~ HIGHWAY PRODUCTS 2708405
08/30/02 2761 CONOR WHITE
5606620
..... DESCRIPTION ......
REFDUNUSED DEPOSIT
CLEAN COPY MACHINE
*PERS DEF
12 ISSUES SPITSEN
ADDITIONS/RI~PAIR
COFFEE
BINGO
SUPPLIES
BAND PERF 9/04/02
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
SUPPLIES 25118
SUPPLIES 25111
SUPPLIES 25374
SUPPLIES 25117
WHITE PAINT
A LOPEZ JR 566398126
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES 15798
UNITED WAY
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
REFD DEVMAINT DEPOSIT
HAZ WASTE DISPOSAL
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
PAGE 10
AMOUNT
1500.00
138.00
3074.27
16.00
1606.10
156.30
162.85
319.15
131.98
300.00
560.09
S.97
39.74
28.31
18.37
92.39
2899.36
161.54
41.50
489.08
52.84
583.42
108.00
4299.46
705.21
4812.00
250.00
1113.79
467.64
1581.43
90.00
RUN DATE 08/29/02 TINE 14:11:39
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
08/29/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: ~ransact.trans_date between "08/26/2002" and "08/30/2002"
FUND - 110 - GENEP, AL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO
1020 595707
1020 595707
1020 595707
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595708
1020 595709
1020 595710
1020 595711
TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT
TOTAL FUND
TOTAL REPORT
ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT
08/30/02 783 WIEBE PAINTING 1108503
08/30/02 783 WIEBE PAINTING 1108503
08/30/02 783 WIEBE PAINTING 1108506
08/30/02 2750 ANN WOO 1101201
08/30/02 2456 WORLD JOURN~ 5208003
08/30/02 792 LILY WU 5706450
08/30/02 802 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPAN 6308840
DESCRIPTION ......
PAINT NEW WALL/SHOP
PAINT SHOP FLOOR
PAINT OFF · MCCLELLAN
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
9/6,7,8,27,28,29
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
SUPPLIES 8325
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0~
0.00
0.00
PAGE 11
AMOUNT
310.00
1300.00
875.00
2485.00
1200.00
270.00
112.50
102.42
822282.03
822282.03
822282.03
RUN DATE 08/29/02 TIME 14:11:39
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
DRAFT
RESOLUTION NO. 02-163
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS
AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND
MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING
SEPTEMBER 06, 2002
WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated
representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the
availability of funds for payment hereof; and
WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows
the following claims and demands in the amounts and fi-om the funds as hereinafter set
forth in Exhibit "A".
CERTIFIED:
Director of Administrative Services
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 16th day of September ,2002, by the following vote:
Vote
Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
09/06/02
ACCOUI'rrING PERIOD: 3/03
CITY OF CUPERTINO
CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "09/02/2002" and "09/06/2002"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO
1020 594751
1020 595347
1020 595712
1020 595712
1020 595712
1020 595712
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595713
1020 595714
1020 595715
1020 595716
1020 595717
1020 595718
1020 595718
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595719
1020 595720
1020 595720
1020 595720
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595721
1020 595722
1020 595723
1020 595724
1020 595725
1020 595726
1020 595727
1020 595728
1020 595728
1020 595728
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595729
ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT
V 07/26/02 1417 JENNIFER ROZWOOD 5606620
V 08/16/02 1417 JENNIFER ROZWOOD 5606620
09/06/02 2221 101 EQUIPMENT SALES 1108315
09/06/02 2221 101 EQUIPMENT SALES 1108312
09/06/02 2221 101 EQUIPMENT SALES 1108303
09/06/02 2221 101 EQUIP~qT SALES 1108314
09/06/02 2110
09/06/02 2566
09/06/02 29
09/06/02 888
09/06/02 M2003
09/06/02 2501
09/06/02 2501
ABC BACKFLOW TESTING REP 1108314
TOM AIDALA 4239222
LYNNE DIANE AITKEN 5806449
ALOHA POOL MAINTENANCE I 5708510
ARMADILLO WILLY'S 2204010
AT&T BROADBAND 1103300
AT&T BROADBAND 1106500
09/06/02 M2003 BAAMA 6104800
09/06/02 968
09/06/02 968
09/06/02 968
BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840
BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840
BAP AUTO PARTS 6308840
09/06/02 M2003
09/06/02 720
09/06/02 2680
09/06/02 M
09/06/02 1066
09/06/02 M
09/06/02 M
09/06/02 508
09/06/02 508
09/06/02 508
BARRY POSNER 2204010
BATTERY SYSTEMS 6308840
BERRYMAN & HENIGAR 1107502
BOHANNAN-REED, KAREN 580
BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRI 5208003
Blanchette, Engalee 550
Blanchette, Engalee 550
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOY 1104510
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOY 1104510
CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOY 110
09/06/02 M2003 CALIFORNIA SPECIALIZED 1107501
..... DESCRIPTION ......
PERFORMER P.O.52633
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
CAR DOLLY
CAR DOLLY
CAR DOLLY
CAR DOLLY
TIME/MATERIALS
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
AUG2002 MAINTENANCE
LEADERSHIP BBQ
9/01~9/30/02
9/01-9/30/02
MEMBERSHIP FEE N.NOWAC
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
LEADERSHIP BOOKS (25)
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
SERVICES 7/13-8/09
Refund: Check - FALL.
LANDFILLS JULY2002
Refund: Check - Legion
Refund: Check - Legion
9/2002 PREMIUM RETIREE
9/2002 PREMIUM ADMIN
9/2002 PREMIUM ACTIVE
SMNR 10/15-16 CASTEEL
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
PAGE 1
AMOUNT
-200.00
-400.00
230.03
230.03
230.04
230.03
920.13
250.00
4196.08
288.00
763.00
399.60
15.82
5.27
2u. O0
40.79
104.24
4.85
149.88
450.00
385.91
2228.30
49.00
112493.65
61.00
9.00
28916.90
407.54
52590.37
81914.81
?' O0
RUN DATE 09/06/02 TIME 08:23:43
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
09/06/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SF~-~CTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_clate between "09/02/2002" and #09/06/2002"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT
..... DESCRIPTION ......
SALES TAX
PAGE 2
AMOUNT
1020 595730 09/06/02 2137
CARL &MANORADVERTISING 5208003
1020 595731 09/06/02 147 CASH 5506549
1020 595731 09/06/02 147 CASH 5506549
1020 595731 09/06/02 147 CASH 5506549
1020 595731 09/06/02 147 CASH 5506549
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595732 09/06/02 149 CASH 1104530
1020 595732 09/06/02 149 CASH 1101201
1020 595732 09/06/02 149 CASH 1104000
1020 595732 09/06/02 149 CASH 1104400
1020 595732 09/06/02 149 CASH 1103300
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595733 09/06/02 166
1020 595734 09/06/02 178
1020 595735 09/06/02 2758
~ 595736 09/06/02 184
i0z0 595737 09/06/02 1407
1020 595737 09/06/02 1407
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595738 09/06/02 1058
1020 595738 09/06/02 1058
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595739
1020 595740
1020 595741
09/06/02 M
09/06/02 M2003
09/06/02 1242
09/06/02 1354
09/06/02 1354
1020 595742
1020 595742
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595743 09/06/02 2578
1020 595744 09/06/02 251
1020 595744 09/06/02 251
1020 595744 09/06/02 251
1020 595744 09/06/02 251
1020 595744 09/06/02 251
1020 595744 09/06/02 251
~'--~- 595744 09/06/02 251
KIMBERLY MARIE CLARK 5806449
COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 110
CO~9~ERCIAL MILL 1108501
JAMES COURTNEY 5606620
CI3~4ING HENDERSON TIRE 6308840
C%~94ING HENDERSON TIRE 6308840
CUPERTINO CO~3NITY SERV 2607404
CUPERTINO CO~3NITY SERV 1107405
Compton, Dale 550
DALE CARNEGIE & ASSOC. I 1106100
DIGITAL PRINT IMPRESSION 1101070
DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY 6308840
DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY 1108501
ELEMENT K JOURNALS 6104800
EVANS WEST VALLEY SPRAY 1108315
EVANS WEST VALLEY SPRAY 1108303
EVANS WEST V~T~T.Ry SPRAY 1108315
EVANS ~4EST V~T.T.R~Y S~zRAY 1108314
EVANS WEST VALLEY SPRAY 1108315
EVANS WEST VALLEY SPRAY 1108302
EVANS WEST V~?.?.~.y SPRAY 1108315
2003 BAYROC CAMPAIGN
PETTY CASH 8/20-9/03
PETTY CASH 8/20-9/03
PETTY CASH 8/20-9/03
PETTY CASH 8/20-9/03
PETTY CASH 8/27-9/01.
PETTY CASH 8/27-9/01
PETTY CASH 8/27-9/01
P~TTY CASH 8/27-9/01
PETTY CASH 8/27-9/01
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
PREMIOM 9/1-10/1/02
FIRELIGHT AND VISION L
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
ROTATING SHELTER
AFFORDABLE PLACEMENT
REFUNDS 23580 & 23579
CONF 10/29 M.PRESTON
ENVELOPES/W/LEGAL
SUPPLIES 8337
SUPPLIES 8337
WINDOWS PROFESSIONAL
TURF SPRAY JOLLYMAN PK
BARK BEETLE MEMORIAL P
BARK BEETLE JOLLYMAN P
BARK BEETLE THREE OAKS
BARK BEETLE JOLLYMAN P
BARK BEETLE MCCLELLAN
TURF SPRAY CREEKSIDE P
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
600.00
130.00
66.46
25.00
20.88
242.34
150.00
9.28
20.00
37.88
28.30
245.46
180.00
36.55
805.38
350.00
132.41
912.94
1045.35
6250.00
12500.00
18750.00
1050.00
89.00
2565.70
185.10
134.20
319.30
99.00
3500.00
500.00
500.00
SO0.O0
250.00
300.00
3500.00
RUN DATE 09/06/02 TIME 08:23:44
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
09/06/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "09/02/2002" and "09/06/2002"
FUND - 110 - GENER~ FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595745
1020 595746
1020 595747
1020 595747
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595748
1020 595749
1020 595750
1020 595750
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595751
1020 595751
1020 595751
1020 595751
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595752
1020 595753
1020 595754
1020 595754
1020 595754
1020 595754
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595755
1020 595756
1020 595757
1020 595757
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595758
1020 595759
1020 595760
1020 595761
1020 595762
ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT
09/06/02 253 EXCHANGE LINEN SERVICE 5606620
09/06/02 M FARAHANI, FATEMEH 580
09/06/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 5606620
09/06/02 2361 FIRST BANKCARD 5606620
09/06/02 274 FRY'S ELECTRONICS 6104800
09/06/02 1932 GAME TIME 1108315
09/06/02 281 GARDENLAND 6308840
09/06/02 281 GARDENLAND 6308840
09/06/02 2237 GLOBAL SPAN PRODUCTS 1108303
09/06/02 2237 GLOBAL SPAN PRODUCTS 1108314
09/06/02 2237 GLOBAL SPAN PRODUCTS 1108314
09/06/02 2237 GLOBAL SPAN PRODUCTS 1108314
09/06/02 298 GRAINGER INC 6308840
09/06/02 301 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 1108501
09/06/02 2546 GTM PLUMBING 6308840
09/06/02 2546 GTM PLUMBING 1108505
09/06/02 2546 GTM PLUMBING 1108503
09/06/02 2546 GTM PLUMBING 1108503
09/06/02 315
09/06/02 2116
09/06/02 2565
09/06/02 2565
JILL HAFF 5806449
HARRIS & ASSOCIATES 2709450
HERNING UNDERGROUND SUPP 1108602
HERNING UNDERGROUND SUPP 1108602
09/06/02 2510 HI-LINE 6308840
09/06/02 M HIGDON, MARY 580
09/06/02 2667 HILTON FARNKOPF & HOBSON 5208003
09/06/02 2027 MARSHA HOVEY 1104400
09/06/02 M2003 JENSENLANDSCAPE 110
..... DESCRIPTION ......
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
Refund: Check - FALL;
STATEMENT AUG2002
STATEMENT AUG2002
SUPPLIES 22503
PARTS/SUPPLIES
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
LABOR/MATERIALS
LABOR/SUPPLIES
LABOR/MATERIALS
LABOR/MATERIALS
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
PARTS/SUPPLIES
LABOR/MATERIALS
LABOR/MATERIALS
LABOR/MATERIALS
LABOR/MATERIALS
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
SUPPLIES 17404
SUPPLIES 17404
SUPPLIES 8336
Refund: Check - SU~9~ER
SERVICES 7/01-7/31/02
OFFICE SUPPLIES
RFND ENCROACH BOND
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
PAGE 3
AMOUNT
9050 . 00
118.55
84.00
1053.40
948.83
2002.23
32.46
1703.42
71.35
62.72
134.07
687.50
2901.11
350.00
1478.75
5417 a6
41, .~3
202.65
185.00
1265.00
1650.00
135.00
3235.00
360.00
600.00
42.29
19.15
61.44
327.49
80.00
3515.00
94.46
50" ~0
RUN DATE 09/06/02 TIME 08:23:45
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
09/06/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SE~..V~TION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between .09/02/2002" and "09/06/2002"
=~3ND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASR ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT
1020 595763 09/06/02 1977
1020 595764 09/06/02 2285
1020 595764 09/06/02 2285
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595765 09/06/02 369
1020 595766 09/06/02 372
1020 595766 09/06/02 372
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595767 09/06/02 382
1020 595768 09/06/02 ME2003
1020 595769 09/06/02 1356
1020 595770 09/06/02 400
1020 595771 09/06/02 408
i 595772 09/06/02 1599
1020 595773 09/06/02 ME2003
1020 595773 09/06/02 ME2003
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595774 09/06/02 1698
1020 595775 09/06/02 1987
1020 595776 09/06/02 444
1020 595777 09/06/02 447
1020 595778 09/06/02 M
1020 595779 09/06/02 2657
1020 595780 09/06/02 M
1020 595781 09/06/02 M
1020 595782 09/06/02 499
1020 595783 09/06/02 493
1020 595783 09/06/02 493
1020 595783 09/06/02 493
1~' 595783 09/06/02 493
JOE'S TRACTOR SERVICE 1108302
KATHRYN KELLY JOESTEN 1106500
KATHRYN KELLY JOESTEN 1106265
KELLY-MOORE PAINT CO INC 1108303
KINKO'S INC 5806349
KINKO'S INC 1106647
KWIK-KOPY PRINTING 5506549
LA BRAE, MARC 1108408
LEXISNEXIS MATTHEW BENDE 1101500
LIFETIME TENNIS INC 5706450
LOS GATOS MEAT & SMOKEHO 5606620
MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK I 1104510
MANNING, COLLEEN 5806349
MANNING, COLLEEN 1106360
MANPOWER INC 1104510
MILESTEK INC 1103500
MINTON'S LUMBER 1106647
MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201
MORTAZAVI, SHAHLA 580
KIMMYLIUS 5606620
Maletis, Margaret R 550
Moyer, Marianne 550
DEBBIE O'NEILL 5606620
OFFICE DEPOT 1107503
OFFICE DEPOT 1104000
OFFICE DEPOT 5806249
OFFICE DEPOT 2308004
..... DESCRIPTION ......
LABOR/MATERIALS
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
SUPPLIES 26705
LALMINATION/SIGNS
ENLARGEMENTS/POSTERS
SEPT NEWSLETTER
METAL PUNC~ SETS
OPINIONS ATTORNEY GEN
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
ASSISTANCE PRG 9/2002
SUPPLIES
ARCHIVE STORAGE
MARTINEZ,ROMEO 8/18
MISC CABLE PARTS
SUPPLIES
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
Refund: Check - SU~94ER
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
Refund: Check - Surf t
Refund: Check - cancel
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
REF INV#179657426001
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
0o00
PAGE 4
AMOUNT
2100.00
20.00
80.00
100.00
19.56
27.64
22.73
50.37
1247.04
73.83
291.78
53713.12
975.00
897.00
272.41
106.69
379.10
848.25
666.65
50.69
78.93
124.00
142.50
18.00
10.00
142.50
-43.29
72.10
272.76
54.10
RUN DATE 09/06/02 TIME 08:23:46
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
09/06/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 5
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "09/02/2002" and "09/06/2002"
FUND - 110 - GENER~tL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT
1020 595783 09/06/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1108101
1020 595783 09/06/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1108101
1020 595783 09/06/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1107503
1020 595783 09/06/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1106343
1020 595783 09/06/02 493 OFFICE DEPOT 1107301
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595784 09/06/02 503 ORCHARD SUPPLY 5606620
1020 595784 09/06/02 503 ORCHARD SUPPLY 5606620
1020 595784 09/06/02 503 ORC~ SUPPLY 5606620
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108303
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SI/PPLY HARDWARE 1108303
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108314
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWi~E 1108314
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORC~ SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108408
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108315
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108312
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108315
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108312
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORC~ SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108314
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108312
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108315
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 2708405
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 2708404
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 2708404
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORC~ SUPPLY HARDWARE 2708405
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108314
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108315
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108315
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108312
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108315
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORC~ SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108315
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108407
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCT{ARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108303
1020 595786 09/06/02 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 2708404
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595787 09/06/02 2692 PACIFIC BELL 6104800
1020 595788 09/06/02 2444 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1108830
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
1108312
1108303
1108507
5208003
1108830
1108314
5606620
1108315
..... DESCRIPTION ......
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
ON-TIME DISCOUNT 8/26
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
SUPPLIES 13056
SUPPLIES 13057
SUPPLIES 8319
SUPPLIES 8319
SUPPLIES 12833
SUPPLIES 15087
SUPPLIES 8698
SUPPLIES 15129
SUPPLIES 8305
SUPPLIES 24364
SUPPLIES 27182
SUPPLIES 8695
SUPPLIES 27108
SUPPLIES 27163
SUPPLIES 8338
SUPPLIES 27109
SUPPLIES 8319
SUPPLIES 15086
SUPPLIES 15090
SUPPLIES 27191
SUPPLIES 15091
SUPPLIES 15088
SUPPLIES 27186
SUPPLIES 8322
SUPPLIES (NO P.O'.)
8120-9119/02
SERVICE TO 8/31/02
7/29-8/27/02
7/29-8/27/02
7/29-8/27/02
7/29-8/27/02
7/29-8/27/02
7/29-8/27/02
7/29-8/27/02
7/29-8/27/02
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
AMOUNT
2.15
46.04
58.11
106.29
49.78
618.04
121.43
-4.26
99.68
216.85
0.00 40.97
0.00 19.47
0.00 162.34
0.00 524.97
0.00 51.91
0.00 16.23
0.00 320.79
0.00 66.06
0.00 256.31
0.00 41.06
0.00 ]~ 93
0.00 : ~
0.00 ~..~9
0.00 24.87
0.00 298.08
0.00 10.66
0.00 -162.36
0.00 41.38
0.00 35.16
0.00 21.54
0.00 37.87
0.00 42.20
0.00 36.78
0.00 272.41
0.00 48.68
0.00 2632.53
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
92.01
21633.39
855.55
5004.73
1947.53
18.29
22.08
606.42
3,40
RUN DATE 09/06/02 TIME 08:23:46
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
09/06/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 6
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/03 C~CK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SF~"~TION CRITERIA:
transact.trans_date between "09/02/2002" and "09/06/2002"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
1020 595789 09/06/02 513
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595790
1020 595791
09/06/02 M
09/06/02 527
09/06/02 526
09/06/02 526
09,/06/02 542
09/06/02 545
09/06/02 M
09106/02 1186
09/06/02 509
09/06/02 M
09/06/02 M2003
09/06/02 M
09/06/02 1071
09/06/02 590
09/06/02 2482
09/06/02 601
09/06/02 1417
09/06/02 M
09/06/02 71
1020 595792
1020 595792
TOTAL CHECK
1''"" 595793
1020 595794
1020 595795
1020 595796
1020 595797
1020 595798
1020 595799
1020 595800
1020 595801
1020 595802
1020 595803
1020 595804
1020 595805
1020 595806
~ 595807
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECT~IC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC
PACIFIC GAS & ELECtrIC
FUND/DEFT
5606620
1108504
1108505
5708510
1108506
1108602
1108511
1108407
1108501
1108503
1108506
5606640
PANDIAN, KARTHIKAYINI 580
PENINSULA BUILDING MATER 1108312
PENINSULA DIGITAL IMAGIN 110
PENINSUL~ DIGITAL IMAGIN 110
PINE CONE LUMBER 1108303
JEFF PISERC~I0 5606640
PRABHU, GEETA 580
THE PRINTERS 5506549
PW SUPERF~RKETS INC 1106647
Patel, Pankaj 550
RA!~T 5806349
RAND~AWA, SUK~I 580
REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 1108830
RI(5{ VOSS TRUCKING INC 5208003
ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY 6104800
ROYAL BRASS INC 6308840
JENNIFER ROZWOOD 5606620
Rice, Julian 550
Si~N JOSE DAIRY 5606620
..... DESCRIPTION ......
7/29-8/27/02
7/29-8/27/02
7/29-8/27/02
7/29-8/27/02
7/29-8/27/02
7/29-8/27/02
7/29-8/27/02
7/29-8/27/02
7/29-8/27/02
7/29-8/27/02
7/29-8/27/02
7/29-8/27/02
Refund: Check - FALL.
SUPPLIES 8301
IMPROVEMENT PLANS
IMPROVEMENT PLANS
SUPPLIES 8328
BBF GOLF CONCESSIONAIR
Refund: Check - FALL,
NAME TAGS
MUSEUM SUPPLIES
Refund: Check - Deposi
MEMBERSHIP FEES
Refund: Check - FALL.
RELOCATE STREET LIGHT
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
J.SEVERANCE W/E 8/23
SUPPLIES
595347,594751 P052633
REFUNDS 23634 & 23635
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
AMOUNT
3369.62
8657.01
3377.60
6401.37
803.10
2654.52
522.56
2202.96
8325.31
4569.75
16.27
504.02
50205.91
60.00
498.49
45.09
18.84
63.93
254.31
1899.00
80.00
201.35
16.63
750.00
280.00
16.50
10924.00
700.00
1008.00
47.93
600.00
40.00
269.30
RUN DATE 09/06/02 TIME 08:23:47
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
09/06/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/03 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "09/02/2002" and "09/06/2002"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT
..... DESCRIPTION ......
SALES TAX
PAGE 7
AMOUNT
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108408
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108504
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108504
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606640
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108504
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108312
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAi~Y 1108312
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 Si~N JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5708510
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108302
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108507
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108506
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5708510
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108503
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108505
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108505
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5708510
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108506
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
1020 595850 09/06/02 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
6/21-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
6/25-8/28/02
6/25-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
6/24-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
6/25-8/28/02
7/30-8/28/02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
25.00
88.90
83.92
82.26
3010.77
15.00
100.13
3076.65
9.00
59.00
251.69
937.72
2069.27
93.48
159.25
78.93
9.00
9.00
1519.30
457.67
964.30
939 74
28..~9
251.69
253.07
158.51
152.02
286.57
308.17
9.00
177.48
2974.23
225.11
59.00
793.21
37.00
216.80
171.15
48.23
15.00
124.63
25.17
38.26
113.81
15.00
44.90
153.28
46.49
RUN DATE 09/06/02 TIME 08:23:48
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
09/06/02
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/03
CITY OF CUPERTINO
CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "09/02/2002" and "09/06/2002"
FUND - 110 - GENEP. AL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT
.............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 S95850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 628
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
~'--~ 595850 09/06/02 625
595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
1020 595850 09/06/02 625
TOTAL CHECK
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108506
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315
SAN JOSE WATER CO, ANY 1108315
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315
SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108407
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315
SAN JOSE WATER COMPAI~Y 1108315
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108312
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5708510
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407
1020 595851 09/06/02 633
1020 595851 09/06/02 633
1020 59585t 09/06/02 633
1020 595851 09/06/02 633
TOTAL CHECK
SANTA CLARA CO~ SHERI 5606620
SANTA CLARA COUNTY SH~RI 5606620
SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERI 5606620
SAIqTA CLARA COUNTY SHERI 5606620
1020 595852
09/06/02 1648 SAVIN CORPORATION (SUPPL 1107301
1020 595853
09/06/02 2772 SECURITY MIRRORS 2709435
1020 595854
09/06/02 647 ELIZABETH SHANNON 5806449
1020 595855
09/06/02 M SHETYE, MANISHA 580
1020 595856
09/06/02 652 SIERRA SPRINGS WATER CO. 1101500
1020 595857
09/06/02 M
SIVARAMAKRISHNAN, VARADH 580
1020 595858
09/06/02 1523 JANASOK~ 4209117
595859
09/06/02 1954 SPHF. RION CORPORATION 1108201
..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX
PAGE 8
AMOUNT
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 44.90
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 37.00
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 37.00
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 69.52
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 2901.51
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 36.50
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 1609.62
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 1887.54
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 1688.79
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 115.60
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 3083.42
7/30-8/28 0.00 140.86
7/30-8/28 0.00 1356.78
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 36.50
7/30-8/28 0.00 36.50
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 789.89
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 36.59
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 34.93
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 26.62
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 23.82
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 8.87
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 38.26
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 279.53
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 196.47
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 808.15
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 95.14
7/30-8/28/02 0.00 467.64
6/21-8/28/02 0.00 121.93
0.00 37116.67
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
STAPLER CARTRIDGE
30" CONVEX MIRRORS
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
Refund: Check - RETURN
BOTTLED WATER SERVICE
Refund: Check ~ Rental
SERVICE AIIREEMENT FOR
N T LA W/E 8/18
697.58
761.00
380.50
792.71
2631.79
83.73
324.60
576.00
100.00
19.97
100.00
9702.21
840.00
RUN DATE 09/06/02 TIME 08:23:49
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
09/06/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/03 Ct{ECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SELECTION CRITERIA: transac~.trans_date between "09/02/2002" and "09/06/2002"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT
1020 595860 09/06/02 2661 SPOT WATER MANAGEMENT 5606640
1020 595861 09/06/02 671 STANDARD BUSINESS MACHIN 1101500
1020 595862 09/06/02 1421 STANLEY STEEMER 1108504
1020 595863 09/06/02 684 C~ERYL STODDARD 5806449
1020 595864 09/06/02 M SL~H, DON SOO 580
1020 595865 09/06/02 2751 SUNDARA SWAMINATHAN 1101201
1020 595866 09/06/02 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620
1020 595866 09/06/02 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595867 09/06/02 2187 T.C.S.A. 2708404
1020 595868 09/06/02 700 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108303
1020 595868 09/06/02 700 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108312
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595869 09/06/02 701 TARGET STORES 5806349
1020 595869 09/06/02 701 TARGET STORES 5806349
1020 595869 09/06/02 701 TARGET STORES 5806349
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595870 09/06/02 708 NANCY TEOMPSON 5806449
1020 595871 09/06/02 1077 TOPCON LASERS SYSTF24S 1108601
1020 595872 09/06/02 725 TWISTERS GYMNASTICS INC 5806449
1020 595873 09/06/02 M Thomas, Janet 550
1020 595874 09/06/02 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1108501
1020 595875 09/06/02 310 VERIZON WIRELESS 1102403
1020 595876 09/06/02 750 VISION SERVICE PLAN (CA) 110
1020 595877 09/06/02 2404 LYNNETTE VISTE 5806449
1020 595878 09/06/02 745 VMI INC 1103500
1020 595878 09/06/02 745 VMI INC 1103500
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595879 09/06/02 751 VOLT 1108501
1020 595880 09/06/02 M WANG, CAIYUN 580
..... DESCRIPTION
MNTHLY MAINT AUG2002
SERVICE
FURNITURE
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
Refund: Check - FALL.
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
9 ~.MPLOYEES
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
FY 2002-2003 OPEN PURC
SUPPLIES 25121
OFFICE SUPPLIES 25122
SUPPLIES 17080
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
SUPPLIES 17405
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
Refund: Check - Legion
#309369653 8/2002
#608881609 AUG2002
PREMIUM SEPT2002
SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR
COLOR MONITORS AND PAN
COLOR MONITORS AND PAN
SUPPLIES
Refund: Check - SUMMER
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
PAGE 9
AMOUNT
14583.33
26.14
600.00
360.00
46.00
1200.00
331.76
1596.71
1928.47
380.00
238.52
524.59
763.11
2~.~8
141.61
212.99
288.00
19.17
21718.75
70.00
43.63
73.43
2147.68
130.00
1370.57
602.25
1972.82
430.68
RUN DATE 09/06/02 TIME 08:23:49
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
09/06/02 CITY OF CUPERTINO
ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 3/03 CH~CK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND
SE~ION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "09/02/2002" and "09/06/2002"
FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND
CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT
1020 S95881
1020 595882
1020 595882
TOTAL CHECK
1020 595883
1020 595884
1020 595885
1020 595886
1020 595886
TOTAL CHECK
TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT
TOTAL FUND
TOTAL REPORT
09/06/02 2766
09/06/02 783
09/06/02 783
09/06/02 M
09/06/02 1081
09/06/02 M
09/06/02 799
09/06/02 799
WEITBRECHT CO~9~UNICATION 1108501
WIEBE PAINTING 1108503
WIEBE PAINTING 1108503
XU, BAOMIN 58O
YAMAGAMI'S NURSERY 1108303
YUN, JONGlq3N 580
ZANKER ROAD LANDFILL 5208003
ZANKER ROAD LANDFILL 5208003
..... DESCRIPTION ......
VALUE PACK PM SYSTEM
TIME/MATERIALS
TIME/MATERIALS
Refund: Check - FALL.
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 835
Refund: C~eck - FALL;
YARDWASTE PROC JULY200
COMPOST DELVRY 7/2002
SALES TAX
0.00
0.00
0.0o
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
PAGE 10
AMOUNT
973.17
170.00
1500.00
1670.00
57.00
253.08
87.00
14198.14
300.00
14498.14
529695.84
529695.84
529695.84
RUN DATE 09/06/02 TIME 08:23:50
- FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
DRAFT
RESOLUTION NUMBER
02-164
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS
AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR SALARIES
AND WAGES PAID ON
September 13, 2002
WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services, or their designated representative
has certified to the accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds
for payment hereof; and
WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law;
NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby allows the
following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds set forth:
GROSS PAYROLL
Less Employee Deductions
$435,942.06
$(129,575.06)
NET PAYROLL
Payroll check numbers issued 62536 through 62800
Void check number(s)
$306.367.00
CERTIFIED:
Director of Administrative Services
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 16th day of September ,2002, by the following vote:
Vote
Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
CITY OF
CUPEI INO
City Hall
10300 Torte Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Telephone: (408) 777-3220
FAX: (408) 777-3366
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
SUMMARY
Agenda Item No.
Meeting Date: September 16, 2002
SUBJECT
Monthly Treasurer's and Budget Report - July 2002
BACKGROUND
Attached is the Treasurer's and Budget report for the period ended July 31, 2002. The
report includes all funds in control of the City.
Investments
The market value of the City's current portfolio totaled $46.6 million at July 31, 2002,
with a maturity value of $45.9 million. The City intends to hold investments until
maturity to redeem full value of the securities plus interest earnings up through the
maturity date.
The City's portfolio composition continued to shift with the purchase of $3.4 million in
mortgage (agency) obligations, decreasing funds invested in the Local Agency Investment
Fund (LAIF). Although there have been no issues as to the availability of LAIF account
funds while the State budget was being negotiated (well into the new fiscal year), the City
is obtaining slightly higher yields by extending the maturity dates (average of 450 days as
opposed to LAIF's 200 days), and investing in a percentage of agency instruments with a
call feature.
The investments of the City of Cupertino are in full compliance with our City investment
policy and/or State law. Investments are tiered to adequately provide the City with
sufficient cash flows to pay its obligations over the next six months.
Revenue/Expenditure Trends
The decrease in the City's current investment portfolio of $1.0 million is primarily a
result of continued summertime capital expenditures. Most General fund revenues are
well below budget projections at the end of July due to the timing of major tax payments
from the County and other tax revenues submitted in the month subsequent to collection.
Printed on Recyc/ed Paper / ~ -- /
Operating expenditures for the General Fund are also below budget in most departments
in this first month of the 2002-03 fiscal year.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the City Council review and accept the July 2002 Treasurer's and
Budget report. The City is in the process of finalizing it's books for the fiscal year ended
June 30, and any adjustments to the year-end revenue and expenditure accruals may
impact current year totals. A final report will be submitted to Council once the fiscal year
audit is complete and adjustments are fully identified
Submitted by:
Approved for submission:
Deputy Treasurer
David W. Knapp
City Manager
City of Cupertino
July2002
ACTIVITY DATE
!PURCHASE I MATURITY
!
01 / 10/00 06/30/02
DESCRIPTION
SECURITIES MATURED
Treasury Note
i I
SECURITIES PURCHASED
07/01/02 12/31/03 Treasury Note
07/15/02 07/15/04 FNMA
6.33%
]6a I
ADJUSTED
COST
2,500,148
2,529,748
2,400,000
VALUE
2,500,000
MARKET
VALUE
YIELD
16a [ 2.40%
FHLB ~kk 3.15%
, ! ! 3.o1%
1,000,000
2,500,000I
2,400,000 i
1,000,000 '~
IUNREALIZED
PROFIT/LOSS
2,500,325
CURRENT PORTFOLIO
400,000
I 10/29/04
07/29/02i
; Cupertino National
'I 07/31/02 I Bank
! CORPORATI~ BONDS I
icom, [
400,000
400,000
400,000
177
400,000 0
400,000 0
i 0 0 0 0
0 0 O, 0
I ~
07/31/02 ]State Pool 16f
]MONEY MARKET FUNDS I
13,168,027
13,168,027
2.71%
13,168,027
07/09/93
I 07/31/02 ] Greater Bay Tmst Company 16j 2.56%i 462 462 462 0
I 01/00/00 IWell Fargo Trsry Plus MMkt g 6j 1.15%i 151 151 43 0
i
I 1.34%i 1,800,805 1,800,805 1,800,805
1,801,417
1301,417
07/31/02 ]Cupertino Natl-Sweep accoun~6j
i MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS ~
' 04/15/07 }FHLMC(P) 16k 6.39%!
1,801310
(107)
1,359,498
05/15/08 [FHLMC(P)
02/15/04 [FHLMC(P)
564,808 521,285 551,122 (13,68'/
08/01/01 08/01/05 ! FHLB(P) [6k 5.38%! 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,544,577 44,577
08/02/01 02/07/05 I FHLB(P) 16k 5.26%1 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,522,740 22,740
08/07/01 08/02/04 [FHLB(P) i6k 5.07%i 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,120 120
09/30/93 16k 6.62%i 2,923,705 2,860,000 3,033,456 109,751
06/28/02 [6k
9,906
11,416
1,300,000
1,300,000
04/15/04 !FHLMC(P) ]6k '
2.68%I 1,349,592
2.79%I 1,320,385
1,331,801
693,479 650,000
06/28/02
06/28/02 05/14/04 iFNMA 16k 2.91%1 1,362,777 1,300,0001 1,373,571 10,794
06/28/02 03/15/04 iFNMA [6k 2.84%I 1,340,281 1,300,000, 1,350,864 10,582
06/28/02 09115/04 [FNMA i6k 3.12~} 1,796,583 1,800,000 1,835,519 38,937
06/28/02 06115104 [FNMA 16k 2.93%i 1,201,511 1,200,000 1,212,474 10,963
06/28/02 11/01/04 [FNMA [6k i 3.34%[
2,072,736
2,000,000
2,400,0001 2,400,000i
1,000,000! 1,002,109]
2,400,000
06/28/02 11/17/03 [FNMA [6k I 2.56%
-- ! 07/15/02 07/15/04 [FNMA i6k i 3.15%
07/29/02 i 10/29/04 IFHLB ~'6k I 3.01%
1,000,000
701,479 8,000
2,085,556~
i 12,820
i I , [ i 276,919
MO I [ ~ 22,525,858 22,131~85i 22,804,886!
US GOVERNMENT SECURITIES
ITreasury Note
5.90% 2,498,860 2,500,000[ 34,258
6.62% 2,474,833 2,500,000 I
2,533,118[
2,584,475]
[Treasury Note 109,642
[Treasury Note i6a i 2.40% 2,529,748~ 2,500,0001 2,547,633 i 17,885
US ! i ! 7,503,441 , 161,784
7,500,000 7,665,225i
06/25/99 11/30/02
02/07/00 06/30/03
07/01/02 12/31/03
45,398,743 } 45,839,448
;
~,Total Managed Portfolio
I i I i 45,000,7301 438,596
iAverage' Yield I I 3.65%I
i Average Length to Maturity (in years) ~
! [ 1.25~
/0- 5
City of Cupertino
July2002
I TRUST & AGENCY PORTFOLIO
ADJUSTED MARKET
YIELD COST VALUE
ACTIVITY DATE
I CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT:
DESCRIPTION
07/27/01 [ 06/27/02 !Cupertino Natl(Kester Trust)
!Total Trust i
& Agency Portfolio
6b
MATURITY
VALUE
4o,4o8 I 40,408
!Traffic Impact
!Reserves[
UNREALIZED
PROFIT/LOSS
40,408
3.65% ~ 0
i 40,408 i 40,408 40,408
BOND RESERVE PORTFOLIO
I Franklin Fiduciary Trust 1.60% 19,100 19,100 0
19,100
2,921,488
04/06/93 '~ 01/01/03 iRepo - 93 A Reserve Fd (400972) 0.55%
12/16/92 ] /Money Mkt - 92 A Reserve Fd (4009~ 1.15% 836,005 ] 836,005
12/16/92 !Money Mkt - 92 B Reserve Fd (4009 1.14%1 1,328,833 i 1,328,833
2,833,425
4,998,2621 5,086,325'
I
2,921,488
836,005
88,063
1,328,833' 0
5,086,325! 88,063
Total Bond Reserve Portfolio 5,017,362 i 5,105,425 5,105,425 ! 88,063
US Treasury Notes
I7%
Obligation
9%
Iinvestments by Type
Managed Portfolio
Corporate Bond~
0%
LAIF
29%
I%
I~larkct
3%
7 00%
IRate of Return Comparison
6.00%
5.00%
4.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
0.00%
6101 7/01 8/01 9/01 10/01 11/01 12/01 1/02 2/02 3/02 4/02 5/02 6/02 7/02
IA, IF
!--I,-Cupe~no
COMPLIANCE WITH INVESTMENT POLICY
City of Cupertino
July 31, 2002
Category
Standard
Comment
Treasury Issues No limit Complies
US Agencies (eg FHLMC) No limit Complies
Medium Term Corporate Bonds/Notes 30% with A rating Complies
LAIF ;40 million Complies
Money Market Funds 20% Complies
iMaximum Maturities 25% up to 15 years Complies (FHLMC at 7 yrs)
" Remainder up to 5 years Complies
Per Issuer Max 10% (except govts) Complies
Bankers Acceptances 180 days & 40% Complies
Commercial Paper 270 days & 25% Complies
Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 30% Complies
Repurchase Agreements 365 days Complies
Reverse Repurchase agreements
Prohibited
Complies
General Fund Budget RePOrt
Actual Actual % of Budget
7/31/02 2001/0_2 Bu~dget i~0_0~2~03_Budget ~YT_D_ 7-31-0____ I YTD 7-31-~2 Over/Under Analysis of Trends
Taxes:
Sales Tax 10,348,000 11,000,000 526,950 443,550 -51.61%
Property Tax __3:789~,_0_0_? 3,700,000 ........... 0 0 -100.00% ___ Payments rec'd Nov- Jan & Apr-June
Transcient Occupancy 1,460,000 2,365,000 0 0 ..... -100.00% TOT for July not received until August
Utility Tax 2,699,000 2,880,000 .......... 5,~14~_ __ ~2_2~.4_9_9_ _- -90.a4% ___
Franchise Fees 2,214,000 2,320,000 0 0 -100.00% Payments rec'd in subsequent month
Other Taxes 1,120,000 1,140,000 ........ _58_,567 65,372 -31.19% __ Property transfer taxes off33% ($148k) from prior year
Licenses and Permits 1,173,600 1,150,000 218,387 155,586 62.35% Rec'd City Center, Kimpton plan checks in 7/01.
Use of Money & Property 1,544,500 1,400,000 230,010 29,975 -74.31% lnterest for July not yet posted
Intergovernmental 3,319,041 3,502,000 223,871 270,268 -7.39%
Charges for Services 429,100 335,000 23,787 20,794 -25.51%
Fines & Forfeitures 600,000 600,000 14,784 17,762 -64.48%
Other Revenue 80,000 15,815,000 6,448 2,885 -99.78%
Total Revenue ~ ~ ~ ~ ___ -73.29%
Operating Expenditures: _
Administrative 1,516,325 1,444,792 38,579 78,838 -34.52%
Law Enforcement 6,123,181 5,335,000 471,429 493,723 11.05%
Community Service 652,882 620,647 21,721 42,322 -58.00% Gov't Channel equipment purchased in July 02.
Administrative Service 3,344,477 2,919,077 466,849 593,852 144.13% ~__ Annual i_nsurance premiums paid in July.
Recreation Service 1,946,332 1,802,991 105,721 159,549 6.19%
_Community Development 4,042,219 2,215,911 81,43~5 95,052 -48.53%
Public Works 9,273,771 9,274,325 ....... _3_5__7,_822 _ _ _ 4~2_8~_98_ -44.61% __
Total Expenditures ~ ~ 1.543.556 ~ -3.88%
Operating Transfers In 2,825,000 1,725,000 160,417 143,750 0.00%
Operating Transfers Out -9,117,921 -26,742,000~ ..... -2,066,502 -2,228,500 0.00% 2002-0_3__Bu~dget i~ncl~udes trans~fers to C!P_for N_ew_ Library
Net Income/Loss -4.415.866 ~ ~ ~ _
Revenue Comparison
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12
"YTD 7131/01
i IXlYTD 7131102
Sales Tax
Property Tax
TOT
Utility Tax
Franchise Fees
Other
Licenses & Permits
Money & Property
Intergovernmental
10 Charges for Services
I Fines & Forfeitures
12 Other Revenue
700.000
Expenditure Comparison
600.000
2 3 4 5 6 7
I Y']'D 7/31101
I~Y'rD 7/31102 ,
I Administrative
2 Law Enforcement
3 Community Service
4 Administrative Service
5 Recreation Service
6 Community Development
7 Public Works
City of Cupertino
Summary of Budget Transfers
7/31/02
Description
2002/03 ADOPTED BUDGET
Debt Reinanancing/Issuance
Acct #
Budget
Adjustment
Revenue
Budget
Expenditure
Budget
i 46,570,0001 67,065,000
15,665,0001
2001/02 CARRYOVER: i
Encumbrances various 5,220,767 i 5,220,767
Department carryovers ~ I~
Project carryovers 10,033,918 [ i 10,033,918
REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS:
EXPENDITURE ADJUSTMENTS:
2001/02 ADJUSTED BUDGET i ' 62,235,000[ 82,319,685
Capital Projects
6~30~02
Fund Proi# Description CIO enc CIO budget Adopted chan.qe Total Bud.qet Encumbrance Expenditure Current Bal.
110 9215 Departrnent remodel 0.00 0 320,000 320,000.00 14,942.50 305,057.50 0.00
210 9612 Minor Storm Drain Improv 71,051.38 155,000 226,051.38 9,300.00 84,461.29 132,290.09
215 9620 Storm Drain Projects 1,029,204.32 1,029,204.32 0.00 4,900.00 1,024,304.32
270 9401 Barrier Removal 31,843.62 (30,000) 1,843.00 1,200.00 643.00
270 9411 W.Stev Creek bike lane 21,115.54 21,115.00 0.00 150.00 20,965.00
270 9412 S.Stelling bike lane 0.00 24,712.14 24,712.00 24,712.00
270 9413 De Anza bike lane 0.00 41,163.34 41,163.00 0.00 640.00 40,523.00
270 9430 Stev Canyon Rd widening 94,474.29 1,070,905.87 95,000 1,260,379.29 1,078,616.99 156,252.00 25,510.30
270 9431 'Stev CrldBlaney TlS modification 0.00 60,290.40' 39,060 99,350.00 11,330.89 88,019.11 0.00
270 9432 -Imstd belleville TlS modif. 75,000.00 75,000.00 75,000.00
270 9435 Neighborhood traf calming 0.00. 0.00 150,000 (89,0t-30) 60,940.00 8,230.00, 46,590.00 6,120.00
270 9436 Stev Crk Trail Bike facilities 0.00: 30,219.99 30,219.00 30,219.00
270 9438 Miller Ave bike facilities 0.00 133,204.32 133,204.00 0.00 2,197.50 131,006.50
270 9440 Woffe bike facilifiy improv 70,030.00 114,028.98 184,058.00 11,890.43 49,390.89 122,776.68
270 9441 Bike detection enhancement 0.00 19,659.15 19,659.00 19,659.00
270 9443 Bollinger Rd bike facility improv. 326,907.86 59,321.40 243,000 629,228.86 86,119.35 293,268.99 249,840.52
270 9444 3ubb/McClellan I/S modE. 1,318.69 0.00 1,318.69 0.00 868.20 450.49
270: 9446 DeAnza/Stev Crk crosswalk enh. 120,000.00 280,000 (200,0.00) 200,000.00 0.00 0.00 200,000.00
270 9447 Mary Avenue gateway 13,000.00 67,000.00 120,000 200,000.00 33,258.59 9,899.89 156,841.52
270 9448 Foothill bird bike lanes 25,056.50 209,100.00 234,156.50 86,450.00 48,364.55 99,341.95
270 9449 Mary Avenue Footbridge 166,136.14 0.00 400,000 566,136.14 0.00 176,258.99 389,877.15
270 9450 Pavement Management 0.00 0.00 1,500,000 305,000 1,805,000.00 67,300.00 1,737,670.55 29.45
270 9531 Ramp meter signal 280~85 390,674.39 89,209.41 479,883.39 389,233.43 10,440.96 80,209.00
270 9532 SR85/Stsv Crk TIS modification 44,627.13 21,692.00 66,319.13 0.00 16,940.64 49,378.49
270 9701 Sidewalk gaps umincop.area 75,000 (75,C~30) 0.00 0.00
270 9702 Citywide bike parking facilities 51,789 51,789.00 51,789.00
280 9213 McClellan Ranch bldg improv. 211,652.96 211,652.00 211,652.00
420 9108 Park Renovations 106,490.00 130,716.60 (C,0,396) 176,810.00 0.00 104,264.16 72,545.84.
420 9110 Stocklmeir Property Acquisition 0 0.00 0.00 0.00
420 9113 Stev Crk trail masterplan 12,931.12 0.00 12,931.12 0.00 6,670.42 6,260.70
420 9115 Skate Park 52,795.00 291,830.00 100,000 444,625.00 0.00 42,671.60 401,953.40
420 9116 San Thomas trail improvements 137,760.98 147,539.31 281,000 566,299.98 21,807.60 117,390.48 427,101.90
420 9117 Stev Crk Trail master plan study 150,000.00 150,000.00 74,734.84 54,289.16 20,976.00
420 9118 Union Pacific RR trail 131,860.04 1,819.10 ~133,679.04 0.00 129,365.17 4,313.87
420 9119 Portal/Wilson park improvement 430,000 201,319 631,319.00 0.00 67,258.95 564,060.05
420 9216 Service center expanison 25,541.00 132,728.68 158,269.00 41,888.00, 48,550.00 67,831.00
420 9217 Housing assistance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
420 9219 Animal control facility 500,000.00 500,000.00 500,000.00
420 9223 Civic center improvements 0.00 200,000 200,000.00 46.97 199,953.03
420 9224 Civic center plaza improvements 0.00 100,000 100,000.00 36,020.25 63,979.75
420 9524 DeAnza/Stsv Creek artedal mgmt 5,700.00 23,575.71 29,275.00 0.00 7,425.87 21,849.13
420 9527, Homestead/Tantau TIS upgrade 17,813.28 0.00 17,813.28 3,733.00 13,908.13 172.15
420 9528 280/Wolfe traffic safety improv. 53,976.83 365,645.03 419,621.83 302,574.31 34,612.88 82,434.64
420 9529 Wolfe Rd.artedal 139,990.61 1,562.00 141,552.61 0.00 140,645.11 907.50
420 9530 Phase III Hmstd artedal m~lmt 38,505.00 45,845.17 84,350.00 0.00 40,809.10 43,540.90
Capital r'rojects
6~30~02
Fund Proj~ Description C/O enc C/O bud,clet Adopted chan,qe Total BudRet Encumbrance Expenditure Current Bal.
420 9533 Green LED T/S lights 0.00 26,036.18 260,000 286,036.00 10,459.86 14,540.14 261,036.00
420 9534 Advanced ITS De Anza blvd 40,838.73 355,120.00 500,000 895,958.73 30,055.47 190,367.26 675,536.00
420 9535 Adaptive traf control system 48,993.31 650,000.00 300,000 998,993.31 635,356.48 63,075.83 300,561.00
420 9536 Stelling corridor TlS upgrade 10,460.65 0.00 10,460.65 0.00 5,558.68 4,901.97
420 9537 Bubb corridor TIS upgrade 6,537.91 0.00 6,537.91 0.00 3,474.19 3,063.72
420 9538' Pruneridge cordder TlS upgrade 10,460.66 0.00 10,460.66 0.00 5,558.69 4,901.97
420 9539 Wolfe/Pruneridge TlS upgrade 9,806.87 0.00 9,806.87 0.00 5,211.29 4,595.58
420 9540 Speed reduction program 24,939.12 60.88 24,999.12 24,939.12 60.00
420 9541 School traffic calming measure 60,636.04 333,188.00 52,000 445,824.04 163,430.68 260,490.41 21,902.95
420 9544 Safe routes CHS 500,000 500,000.00 500,000.00
420 9703 Apple public art 0 100,000 100,000.00 100,000.00
423 9214 Library expansion 4,985.73 4.61 4,985.73 0.00 4,985.73 t0.00,
423 9222 Library construction 1,994,349.15 0.00 1,500,000 968,337 4,462,686.15 1,725,520.72 1,016,299.40 1,720,866.03
424 9210 Senior Center Expansion 230,146.28 221,190.81 (!50,C~0) 301,336.28 10,952.00 255,900.81 34,483.47
425 9313 Four Season Comer 0.00 295,108.63 142,863 437,971.00 0.00 25,896.05 412,074.95
425 9314 :our Season Art Sculpture 94,563.70 57,137 151,700.00 0.00 7,912.00 143,788.00
426 9212 Sports Ctr.fltness expansion 2,740.07 1,686,080.62 1,688,820.07 0.00 58,901.16 1,629,918.91
560 9105 Blackberry Farm 0.00 314,939.04 175,000 489,939.00 0.00 38,056.35 451 82.65
560 9112 BBF master plan study 150,000.00 150,000.00 34,000.00 0.00 116,~30.00
Total 4,300,483.38 9,417,928.89 7,269,000 1,408,049 22,395,443.08 4,802,242.64 5,552,608.92 12,006,591.52
ok ok ok ok
CITY OF
CUPEPxTINO
City Hall
10300 Torte Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Telephone: (408) 777-3220
FAX: (408) 777-3366
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Agenda Item No.
SUMMARY
Meeting Date: September 16, 2002
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Review and Approval of year-end close 2001/02 budget adjustments.
BACKGROUND
In conjunction with the close of our fiscal year, Finance staff reviews the budget, compares
it to actual revenues and expenditures and proposes final adjustments to more accurately
reflect what has happened during the year. Our guidelines require that these adjustments be
approved by the City Council. The items below represent the final 2001/02 budget
adjustments for Council review and adoption:
,," Use of Money and Property
,/ Public Information
$55,100 budget increase
$55,100 budget increase
Total General Fund impact of these budget adjustments is zero. The increase in the
Public Information budget is primarily attributable to two items, the city survey and the
translation and interpretative service.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is the staff recommendation that the City Council approve the above adjustments.
Submitted by:
Caiol A. Atwood
Director of Administrative Services
Approved for submission:
David W. Knapp
City Manager
CITY OF
CUPERTinO
City Hall
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Telephone: (4011) 777-3223
FAX: (408) 77%3366
MEMORANDUM
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
To:
From:
Subject:
Date:
Dave Knapp, City Manager; Carol Atwood, Director of Administrative Services; Therese Smith,
Director of Parks and Recreation; Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development; Ralph Qualls,
Director of Public Works; Sandy Abe, HR Manager; Charles Kilian, City Attorney; Kimberly Smith,
City Clerk.
Grace Johnson, Deputy City Clerk
RECORDS FOR DESTRUCTION
August 30, 2002
Listed on the attached sheets are records, which are in excess of two years old and can therefore be destroyed in
accordance with the City's records retention schedule. Please review the list and contact me if you believe any of these
.fiJ~s are of historical or administrative significance and should not be destroyed. If approved, a resolution authorizing
· uction will be on the council agenda for September 16.
City Clerk ~ '"' Date City Attome~, '
NO ORSIB~TION TO DESTRUCTION:
Ci~ M~er// .Date
Dir. o~Community Dev. Date
Dir. of Public Works Q~ Date
Dir. of Administrative Services Date
Dir. of Parks & Recreation
Date
T-
Date
Encis: City Clerk, Code Enforcement
Printed on Recvcted Paper
RECORDS INVENTORY FOR MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION
Department: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Grace Johnson
Pal~e: ~- of ~. - File Name: Aul~ust Librar 'Box 1
No. (to be used File Name, Project name File Number, Resolution, Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter
for microfiche or Developer Ordinance, Application Permit (if any) (or most M = to be microfilmed
card #) Number recent date) D = to be destroyed
REQUIRED
Nancy Hendee Housing 106.1 Housing rehabilitation, 1976-77 D
Res. 4095, 3885, 443 !~ HCD
4054, 3849, 4198
Page
RECORDS INVENTORY 1~,_ . MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION
Department: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Grace Johnson
Page: ~ of ~ - File Name: August Library Box 2
No. (to be used File Name, Project name File Number, Resolution, Subject, Application, Address or Location Date ranges Enter
for microfiche or Developer' Ordinance, Application Permit (if any) (or most M = to be microfilmed
card #) Number recent date) D = to be destroyed
REQUIRED
Hillside Area, Vegetation 127 D
Clearance Ord. 882, 881, Res. 4719
Citizens Review Includes report fi.om 1973-1974 D
Committee for Capital committee
Improvement Projects
Capital Projects, Dept. of 1971-72 D
Pubic Works
Citizens Goals Committee 1973 D
Santa Clara Valley Water 112 Correspondence, board 1977-78 D
District Res. 4436, 4863 minutes
Mercedes Tank No. 1 119 Project 78-1, Recoatin~ 1977 D
Northpoint Subdivision 108.2 Vehicle code 1977 D
Res. 4572, 4550
Capital Improvements Adopted CIP budget 1974 D
Program including five-
year pro~xam
Emer~;enc¥ Plan Res. 3026, 3009, 3177 Civil defense 1971-72 D
HUD file 2 106 Housing rehabilitation 1977-78 D
Res. 4643, 4854, 4758 loan program, Block
Grant Pro~;ram
HUD 106 Housing rehabilitation, 1977-78 D
Res 4652, 4612 jobs/housing imbalance,
block [Tant pro~ram
Summary Sheets (staff Various 4/75-7/76 D
reports to cit~ council~
Fireworks Permits Ord. 447 Permits and 1971-72, D
correspondence 74-75
Fee Survey and Anal~'sis 1974 D
Energy Conservation Minutes and 1973 D
Committee correspondence
Ecology/, Air pollution 1971-73 D
Community Center Wm. Hedley, architect 1970-71 D
Building
Page
RECORDS INVENTORY FOR MICROFILMING OR DESTRUCTION
Department: City Clerk Contact: Kimberly Smith or Grace Johnson
Pal]e: ~ of [ - File Name: Ausust Box 3
No. (to be used File Name, Project name File Number, Resolution, Subject, Application, Address or Locatio~ Date ranges Enter
for microfiche or Developer Ordinance, Application Permit (if any) (or most M = to be microfilmed
card #) Number recent date) D -- to be destroyed
REQUIRED
Parkin~ Citations 1999 D
Soundoffs (originals) 1997, 98, 99 D
Page
DRAFT
RESOLUTION NO. 02-165
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CUPERTINO APPROVING DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN
RECORDS (CITY CLERK, CODE ENFORCEMENT)
WHEREAS, the City Council did by adoption of Resolution Nos. 8894 and 02-
037 establish rules and regulations for records retention and destruction; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain records in excess of two years old
no longer contain data of any historical or administrative significance; and
WHEREAS, the departmental request for permission to destroy all said records in
excess of two years old has been approved by the City Clerk and the City Attorney
pursuant to Resolution Nos. 8894 and 02-037;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Cupertino authorizes destruction of the records specified in the schedule attached hereto.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 16th day of September 2002, by the following vote:
Vote
Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
County of Santa Clara
Environmental Resources Agency
Building Inspection/Land Development Engineering and Surveying
County Government Center, East Wing
70 west Hedding Street. 7th Floor
San Jose, California 95110
Bldg. Inspec. (408) 299-5700 Land Devel. 299-5730 FAX 279-8537
www. sccbuilding.org
July 10, 2002
Kim Smith, City Clerk
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
The attached map and description dated May 23, 2002 of territory proposed
for annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled SAN FERNANDO AVENUE 02-02 is
in accordance with Government Code Section 56757 (b) (2). The boundaries of said
territory are definite and certain. The proposal is in compliance with the Local
Agency Formation Commission's road annexation policies.
Martin D. Marcott
County Surveyor
Attachment
cc: LAFCO Executive Director (w/attachment)
Board of Supervisors: Donald E Gage. Bianca Alvarado, Pete McHugh. James T Beall. Jr.. Liz Kniss
County Executive: Richard wittenberg
/3-1
EXHIBIT "A"
ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF CUPERTINO,CA·
ENTITLED·
SAN FERNANDO AVE. 02-02
Ail that certain real property situated in the unincorporated
area of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, being the
East 50 feet of Section 111 of "Map of Subdivision 'A' Monta
Vista", recorded on April 11, 1917 in Book (Volume) "P" of Maps
at page 20, Santa Clara County Records described as follows:
Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Section 111, said point
also being the most Northwesterly corner of that certain
annexation to the City of Cupertino entitled "San Fernando Ave.
81-0~";.
Thence along the line common to said annexation~and the Easterly
line of said Section, South 198.42 feet to the Northerly line of
San Fernando Avenue, 40 feet wide, said point also being the most
Northeasterly corner of that certain annexation to said City
entitled "San Fernando Ave. 88-07";
Thence along said Northerly line of San Fernando Avenue and 'the
Northerly line of said annexation, West 50.00 feet;
Thence leaving said lines and along the Westerly line of the East
50.00 feet of said Section 111, North 198.42 feet to the
interesection thereof with the Southerly line of that certain
annexation to said City entitled "Almaden Ave. 89-11";
Thence along said Southerly line also being the Northerly line of
said Section, East 5.85 feet to the Southeasterly corner of said
annexation;
Thence continue along said Northerly line, East 44.15 feet to the
point of beginning;
Containing 0.228 of an acre, more or less.
Date: May 23, 2002
APN: 357-15-039
Address: 21831 San Fernando Ave., Cupertino, CA
~VE.
Line a~ey, iSti n~ cmne~.c~ion
Line o( proposed, c~n,n¢~<zhon
[~rstl nc) ann~-f.,~'{';(m 5A~q
I::;:ERI, JA~O 0 A~/E.
LOCATI0/4
E%HI ESIT "15"
PROPODED ANNF..XAT! 0 H
To THE CITY OF CUPER'TIHO,
ENTITLED:
SCALE: I"= So' MAY2~20021
RESOLUTION NO. 02-146
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
SETTING DATE FOR CONSIDERATION OF REORGANIZATION OF AREA
DESIGNATED "SAN FERNANDO AVENUE 02-02", PROPERTY LOCATED ON
THE NORTH SIDE OF SAN FERNANDO AVENUE BETWEEN ORANGE
AVENUE AND BYRNE AVENUE; APPROXIMATELY 0.228 ACRE, LIU AND
CHEN (APN 357-15-039)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cupertino has received a request for
annexation of territory designated "San Fernando Avenue 02-02" from property owners,
Chao-Yue Liu and Daphne W. Chen; and
WHEREAS, the property, 0.228+ acre on the north side of San Femando Avenue
between Orange Avenue and Byme Avenue (APN 357-15-039) is contiguous to the City
of Cupertino and is within its urban service area; and
WHEREAS, annexation would provide for use of City services; and
WHEREAS, this territory is uninhabited and was prezoned on May 21, 1984, to
City of Cupertino Pre R1-7.5 zone; and
WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino, as Lead Agency for environmemal review
completed an initial study and granted a Negative Declaration for annexation; and
WHEREAS, the County Surveyor of Santa Clara county has found the map and
description (Exhibits "A" and "B") to be in accordance with Government Code Section
56826, the boundaries to be definite and certain, and the proposal to be in compliance
with LAFCO's road annexation policies; and
WHEREAS, the fee set by the County of Santa Clara to cover staff cost for above
certification has been paid; and
WHEREAS, as provided in Government Code Section 56826 the City Council of
the City of Cupertino shall be conducting authority for a reorganization including an
annexation to the City; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56837 provides that if a petition for
annexation is signed by all owners of land within the affected territory the City Council
may approve or disapprove the annexation without public hearing;
Resolution No. 02-146 Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Cupertino hereby initiates annexation proceedings and will consider annexation of the
territory designated "San Femando Avenue 02-02" and detachment from the Santa Clara
County Lighting Service District at their regular meeting of September 16, 2002.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 19th day of August 2002, by the following vote:
Vote
Members of the City Council
AYES: Lowenthal, Chang, James, Kwok
NOES: None
ABSENT: Sandoval
ABSTAIN: None
ATTEST:
/s/Kimberly Smith
City Clerk
APPROVED:
/s/Richard Lowenthal
Mayor, City of Cupertino
/3-5'
RESOLUTION NO. 02-166
DRAFT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
MAKING DETERMINATIONS AND APPROVING THE REORGANIZATION
OF TERRITORY DESIGNATED "SAN FERNANDO AVENUE 02-02",
PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SAN FERNANDO AVENUE
BETWEEN ORANGE AVENUE AND BYRNE AVENUE; APPROXIMATELY
0.228 ACRE, LIU AND CHEN (APN 357-15-039)
WHEREAS, a petition for the annexation of certain territory to the City of
Cupertino in the County of Santa Clara consisting of 0.228+ acre on the north side of San
Fernando Avenue between Orange Avenue and Byme Avenue (APN 357-15-039) has
been filed by property owners Chao-Yue Liu and Daphne W. Chen; and
WHEREAS, on August 19, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 02-
146 initiating proceedings for annexation of the area designated "San Femando Avenue
02~02"; and
WHEREAS, said territory is uninhabited and all owners of land included in the
proposal consent to this annexation; and
WHEREAS, Section 56757 of the California Government Code states that the
Local Agency Formation Commission shall not have any authority to review an
annexation to any City in Santa Clara County of unincorporated territory which is within
the urban service area of the city of the annexation if initiated by resolution of the
legislative body and therefore the City Council of the City of Cupertino is now the
conducting authority for said annexation; and
WHEREAS, Government Code Section 56837 provides that if a petition for
annexation is signed by all owners of land within the affected territory the City Council
may approve or disapprove the annexation without public hearing; and
WHEREAS, evidence was presented to the City Council;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Cupertino as follows:
That it is the conducting authority pursuant to Section 56757 of the Government
Code for the annexation of property designated "San Femando Avenue 02-02",
more particularly described in Exhibit "A";
2. That the following findings are made by the City Council of the City of Cupertino:
Resolution No. 02-166 Page 2
o
ao
That said territory is uninhabited and comprises approximately 0.228
acre.
That the annexation is consistent with the orderly annexation of territory
with the City's urban service area and is consistent with the City policy
of annexing when providing City services.
Co
The City Council has completed an initial study and has found that the
annexation of said territory has no significant impact on the environment,
and previously approved the granting of a Negative Declaration.
do
The City Council on May 21, 1984, to, enacted an ordinance prezoning the
subject territory to City of Cupertino Pre R1-7.5 zone.
Annexation to the City of Cupertino will affect no changes in special
districts.
That the territory is within the city urban service area as adopted by the
Local Agency Formation Commission.
g. That the annexation is made subject to no terms and conditions.
h°
That the County Surveyor has determined the boundaries of the proposed
annexation to be definite and certain, and in compliance with the
Commission's road annexation policies. The City shall reimburse the
County for actual costs incurred by the County Surveyor in making this
determination.
That the proposed annexation does not create islands or areas in which it
would be difficult to provide municipal services.
jo
That the proposed annexation does not split line of assessment of
ownership.
k. That the proposed annexation is consistent with the City's General Plan.
1. That the City has complied with all conditions imposed by the
commission for inclusion of the territory in the City's urban service area.
mo
That the territory to be annexed is contiguous to existing City limits under
provisions of the Government Code.
That said annexation is hereby ordered without election pursuant to Section 56837
et seq. of the Government Code.
Resolution No. 02-166 Page 3
That the Clerk of the City Council of the City of Cupertino is directed to give
notice of said annexation as prescribed by law.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon completion of these reorganization
proceedings the territory annexed will be detached from the Santa Clara County Lighting
Service District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
of Cupertino this 16th day of September 2002, by the following vote:
Vote
Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
RESOLUTION NO. 02-167
DRAFT
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
AMENDING RESOLUTION 02-065 WHICH ESTABLISHED A
CUPERTINO TEEN COMMISSION TO SET A LIMIT OF ONE TERM
WHEREAS, providing activities and oppommities for youth is a high priority of the
Cupertino City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Council has determined that the community is best served in this
endeavor by establishing a Teen Commission to advise the Council and Parks and Recreation
staff on issues and projects important to youth; and to reflect the broadest possible representation
of Cupertino youth.
WHEREAS, the Council adopted Resolution No. 02-065 establishing a Teen
Commission and wishes to update that resolution to reflect new term limits;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council establishes the
Cupertino Teen Commission according to the following:
The Cupertino Teen Commission will be comprised of thirteen (13) members, at least one
person from each public middle school and public high school in Cupertino. Membership on
the Commission will be limited to Cupertino residents. Members may attend schools outside
of the city limits, or be schooled at home. Commissioners must be in 8th through 12th grade.
The members of the Teen Commission shall be appointed pursuant to the current recruitment
process adopted by City Council, with the following exceptions: Applicants under the age of
18 must have written permission of a parent or guardian to participate in the Teen
Commission. The Parks and Recreation Department will work with the City Clerk to notice
vacancies so that outreach to schools and youth organizations is accomplished. A letter of
recommendation shall be submitted as part of the application process. The Council shall
appoint new commissioners in June, to be seated in September, except in the case of
reappointment of vacant seats.
^)
In the event that more than 30 valid applications are received for the Teen
Commission, the following procedure will be used to select those applicants that
will be interviewed:
1)
For any grade for which there are 6 or fewer applications, all applications
for that grade will be retained for the interview phase.
2)
For any grade for which there are more than 6 applications, the City Clerk
will distribute all applications to all Councilmembers. Each
Councilmember will rank the applications separately for that grade with a
Resolution No. 02-167
3)
number starting at 1 for the Councilmembers least favored applicant and
continuing with successively higher numbers to the highest ranked
applicant. For example, if there are 10 applications in grade 11, each
Councilmember will rate each of those applications from 1 to 10, with 10
being the score of the Councilmember's top choice. The City Clerk will
then add those scores and retain only those applications with the top 6
scores. In the case of a tie for 6th place, all the applications in 6th place
will be retained.
All retained applicants will then be interviewed by the Council.
t3)
For all applications in the interview pool, the City Clerk will summarize the
applications on a chart that indicates applicants' names, schools, and grades in
order to assist the Council decision process. The summary chart will be
distributed to the Councilmembers before interviewing begins.
c)
Each applicant in the interview pool will then be interviewed by Council. The
applicant will start with a two-minute speech answering the questions: Why do
you wish to serve? and Why do you feel you are qualified to serve?
D)
Each Councilmember will then have the opportunity to ask at least 1 question of
the applicant.
E)
When the entire pool has been interviewed, Council will discuss the applicants.
After the discussion, ballot voting will take place to determine the appointments.
F)
In case no applicant is appointed from one of the 5 public schools in Cupertino,
that seat will be left open and the opening will be re-advertised for a subsequent
appointment process.
Commissioners should reflect the broadest possible representation of Cupertino youth.
The term of office of each commissioner shall be two years, beginning in September with the
new school year.
Commissioners shall not serve consecutive terms unless there is a vacancy for which there is
no eligible applicant, at which time the City Council may waive this restriction.
None of the Teen Commissioners shall be otherwise officials or employees of the City of
Cupertino nor be related by blood or marriage to any official or employee of the city.
The Commission shall elect a chair and vice-chair at the beginning of each year.
Meeting times and location will be decided by the commission at the first meeting of the
year, and will be .adopted as the annual meeting schedule pursuant to the Brown Act.
Resolution No. 02-167
· Actions taken by the Commission will be by majority vote.
· The Department of Parks and Recreation will provide staff support to the Teen Commission
and will post meeting agendas.
Commencing in 2002, seven (7) Teen Commissioners shall be appointed for a one-year term
and six (6) appointed for a two-year term. In 2003, (7) Teen Commissioners will be
appointed to a two-year term setting the staggered terms of six (6) appointments in even
numbered years and seven (7) appointments in odd-numbered years. Vacant seats will be
filled with applican!s willing to finish the term.
· The powers and function of the Teen Commission will be to advise the City Council and staff
on issues and projects important to youth.
IT IS NOW THEREFORE RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cupertino that
these amendments to the Teen Commission Resolution 02- be adopted.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 16th day of September, 2002 by the following vote:
Vote
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Members of the City Council
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
CITY OF
CUPE INO
city Hall
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Telephone: (408) 777-3210
FAX: (408) 777-3366
Website: www.cupenino.org
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item Number/..6'"'
Agenda Date: September 16, 2002
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Approve a fee waiver request in the approximate amount of $14,833.00 for the Moon
Festival of Silicon Valley's event scheduled for September 21 and 22, 2002, at Memorial
Park.
BACKGROUND
The Moon Festival of Silicon Valley is a Cupertino-based, nonprofit organization who
has scheduled its annual Moon Festival for Saturday and Sunday, September 21 and 22,
2002. The event will be held at Memorial park. The breakdown of costs is attached.
Pursuant to the City of Cupertino's facility use policy, we waive the nonprofit facility use
fees, but not the staffing costs. Historically, City Council has waived all costs, including
staffing, associated with this festival.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that City Council waive the fees in the approximate amount of
$14,883.00 for the 2002 Moon Festival.
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED FOR SUBMISSION
TO CITY COUNCIL:
Therese Ambrosi Smith, Director
Parks and Recreation
David W. Knapp
City Manager
MOON FESTIVAL 2002
FACILITY USE / STAFF FESTIVAL
CITY FEE WMVERS
Quinlan Center - Cupertino Room
Tuesday, July 30
Saturday, September 21
Sunday, September 22
Cupertino Room Total
$ 125.00
$1,125.00
$ 975.00
$2,100.00
Quinlan Center - Conference Room
Saturday, September 21
Sunday, September 22
Conference Room Total
Quinlan Center - Social Room
Friday, September 20
Saturday, September 21
Sunday, September 22
Social Room Total
Senior Center - Bay Room
Saturday, September 21
Sunday, September 22
Bay Room Total
Senior Center - Arts
and Craft Room
Saturday, September 21 $
Sunday, September 22 $
Arts and Craft Room Total $
Senior Center - Classroom
Saturday, September 21
Sunday, September 22
Classroom Total
$ 375.00
$ 325.00
$ 700.00
$ 900.00
$ 900.00
$ 780.00
$2,580.00
$ 455.00
$, 455.00
$ 910.00
455.00
455.00
910.00
455.00
455.00
910.00
Amphitheater
Saturday, July 20
Sunday, July 21
Amphitheater Total
385.00
385.00
770.00
Public Works Staff
Public Works Staff Total
$3,000.00
Parks & Recreation Staff
P & R Staff Total
$ 655.00
Santa Clara County Sheriffs
Sheriffs Total
FESTIVAL TOTALS
$2,048.00
$11,433.00
MOON FESTIVAL 2002
FACILITY / STAFF FESTIVAL FEEWAIVER FEES
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
8)
Cupertino Room
Conference Room
Social Room
Senior Center
Amphitheater
Public Works Staff
Parks & Recreation Staff
Santa Clara County Sheriffs
FESTIVAL TOTAL
$2,100.00
$ 700.00
$2,580.00
$2,730.00
$ 770.00
$3,300.00
$ 655.00
$2~048.00
$14,883.00
RESOLUTION NO. 02-168
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY AND DEVELOPERS, GHOLAMREZA JAVANMARD AND
EZAT LOUKZADEH, 10071 ORANGE AVENUE, APN 357-16-029
WHEREAS, there has been presented to the City Council a proposed improvement
agreement between the City of Cupertino and developer, Gholamreza Javanmard and Ezat
Loukzadeh, for the installation of certain municipal improvements at 10071 Orange Avenue and
said agreement having been approved by the City Attorney, and Developers having paid the fees
as outlined in the attached Exhibit A;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Mayor and the City Clerk are
hereby authorized to sign the aforementioned agreement on behalf of the City of Cupertino.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 16th day of September, 2002 by the following vote:
Vote
Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
Resolution No. 02-168
Page 2
EXHIBIT "A"
SCHEDULE OF BOND, FEES, AND DEPOSITS
DEVELOPMENT: Gholamreza Javanmard and Ezat Loukzadeh
LOCATION: 10071 Orange Avenue
A. Faithful Performance Bond: $11,737.00
ELEVEN THOUSAND SEVEN HLrNDRED THIRTY-SEVEN AND 00/100 DOLLARS
B. Labor and Material Bond: $11,737.00
ELEVEN THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED THIRTY-SEVEN AND 00/100 DOLLARS
C. Checking and Inspection Fees: $
ONE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED FORTY AND 00/100 DOLLARS
D. Indirect City Expenses:
E. Development Maintenance Deposit:
ONE THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS
F. Storm Drainage Fee:
TWO HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE AND 25/100 DOLLARS
G. One Year Power Cost:
ONE HUNDRED FIFTY AND 00/100 DOLLARS
Ho
I.
J.
K.
L.
Street Trees:
Map Checkin. g Fee:
Park Fee:
Water Main Reimbursement:
Maps and/or Improvement Plans:
1,840.00
N/A
$ 1,000.00
$ 225.25
$ 150.00
By Developer
N/A
N/A
N/A
As specified in
Item #21 of agreement
AGREEMENT
10071 Orange Avenue
APN 357-16-029
This AGREEMENT made and entered into this 30 day of fft~ff . 2002, by and between
the CITY OF CUPERTRqO, a municipal corporation of the State-of ~alifomia, hereinafter
designated as CITY, and Gholamreza Javanmard and Ezat Loukzadeh~ hereinafter designated
as DEVELOPER.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, THE DEVELOPER has made application to the CITY to SECURE A
BUILDING PERMIT to comet a Single Family Dwelling hereinafter referred to as
"Project".
WHEREAS, CITY hereby approves the improvement plans and specifications prepared for
the Project by Kirkeby Engineering a true copy of which improvement plans and specifications
are on file in the office of the City Engineer of Cupertino; and
WHEREAS, the same are incorporated herein by reference, the same as though set out in
full;
NOW, THEREFORE, said improvement plans and specifications shall be hereinafter
called the "Plans", and the work to be done under the Plans shall be called the "Work".
Page 1 ofll
File No.: 52,316
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of this AGREEMENT, the CITY hereby established the
amounts of Bonds, Fees, and Deposits as set forth in the following schedule:
SCHEDULE OF BONDS, FEES AND DEPOSITS
Street Improvement Category:
PART A. Faithful Performance Bond: Off-Site: $11,737
PART C. $1,840
110-2211
PART B. Labor and Material Bond: Off-Site $11,737
110-2211
Checking and Inspection Fee:
110-4538
Development Maintenance Deposit:
110-2211
PART E. Storm Drainage Fee: Basin 2 $225.25
Account #: 215-4072
PART F. One Year Power Cost: $150.00
110-4537
PART G. Street Trees By Developer
PART H. Map Checking Fee: N/A
PART D. $1,000
PART I. N/A
PART J. N/A
PART K.
110-4539
Park Fee: ZONE I
ACCT #: 280-4081
Water Main Reimbursement Fee:
110-4554
Maps and/or Improvement Plans
As Specified in Item #20
By Developer
Page 2 of 11
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties
hereto as follows, TO WIT:
1. DEDICATION
A. The DEVELOPER offers to dedicate the real property shown on Exhibit "A",
which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. Said dedicated property shall
be flee and clear of all liens or encumbrances except those which the CITY shall waive in
writing. The DEVELOPER agrees not to revoke said offer of dedication, and to keep said
offer open until the CITY accepts offer by resolution.
B. Upon execution of this AGREEMENT the DEVELOPER agrees to deliver a
properly executed grant deed to the CITY of the real property described in Exhibit "A", and
such other executed conveyances, or instruments necessary to convey clear title as herein
required. The DEVELOPER shall provide, at the DEVELOPER'S sole cost and expense,
to the City:
(])
A preliminary title report issued by a title insurance company relating to the
property offered for dedication.
(2)
A standard policy of title insurance issued by a title insurance company and
insuring the CITY in the sum of: N/A, and which shall show said property
free and clear of all liens or encumbrances except those as the CITY shall
expressly waive in writing; said policy shall be furnished at the time of
acceptance of dedication and recordation of deed.
C. Upon the condition precedent that the DEVELOPER shall perform each and every
covenant and condition of this AGREEMENT, the CITY agrees to accept said real property
offered for dedication.
2. INSTALLATION OF WORK
It is further agreed that:
A. The DEVELOPER shall install and complete the Work within one (1) year from the
date of execution of this AGREEMENT, or such longer period as may be specifically
authorized in writing by the City Engineer. In the event the DEVELOPER fails or refuses
to complete the Work within the specified period of time, the CITY, at its sole option, shall
be authorized to complete the Work, in whatever manner the CITY shall decide. In the
event the CITY completes the Work, the CITY may recover any and all costs incurred
thereby from the DEVELOPER or the DEVELOPER'S surety or both. No final inspection
shall be granted or street improvements shall not be accepted unless all the requirements
for safety purposes are installed such as sidewalks, handicap ramps, street lights, etc.
Page 3 of 11
B. The DEVELOPER shall install and complete the Work in a good and workmanlike
manner in accordance with the plans as approved by the City Engineer of Cupertino. The
Work shall be done in accordance with existing ordinances and resolutions of the CITY
and in accordance with all plans, specifications, standards, sizes, lines, and grades
approved by the City Engineer. The Work shall be done in accordance with all State and
County Statutes applicable hereto. The decision of the City Engineer shall be final as to
whether any material or workmanship meets the standards, specifications, plans, sizes lines
and grades as set forth.
C. It is further agreed that the Work shall be done in accordance with the most current
Standard Specifications of the Department of Public Works, California Department of
Transportation, State of California, and in accordance with the specifications of the
Cupertino Sanitary District where applicable.
Wherever the words "State" or "California Division of Highways" are mentioned in the
State Specifications, it shall be considered as referring to the CITY of Cupertino; also
wherever the "Director" or "Director of Public Works" is mentioned, it shall be considered
as referring to the City Engineer.
In case of conflict between the State Specifications and the specifications of the CITY,
and/or the Cupertino Sanitary District, the specifications of the CITY and/or the Cupertino
Sanitary District shall take precedence over and be used in lieu of such conflicting
portions.
EXCAVATION PERMIT
It is further agreed that the DEVELOPER shall comply with Section Three of Ordinance
No. 130 of the CITY by obtaining an excavation permit from the City Engineer before the
commencement of any excavation in, on, or under the surface of any existing public street,
lane, alley, sidewalk, or other public place. It is further agreed that the DEVELOPER shall
notify the City Engineer of the exact date and time when the proposed excavation is to
commence.
QUITCLAIM DEED
It is further agreed that the DEVELOPER, when requested by the CITY, shall quitclaim all
his rights and interests in, and shall grant to CITY authorization to extract water from the
underground strata lying beneath said project and DEVELOPER agrees to execute a
"Quitclaim Deed and Authorization" in favor of CITY, when presented to them for
signature.
Page 4 of 11
5. BONDS AND OTHER SECURITY
A. Upon the execution of this AGREEMENT, the DEVELOPER shall file with the
CITY a faithful performance bond to assure his full and faithful performance of this
AGREEMENT. The penal sum of said faithfifl performance bond shall be the full cost of
any payment to be made under this AGREEMENT, the value of any land agreed to be
dedicated, and any improvements are to be made under this AGREEMENT. In the event
that improvements are to be made under this AGREEMENT, the DEVELOPER shall, in
addition to said faithfifl performance, file with the CITY a labor and materials bond in a
penal sum adequate to assure full payment of all labor and materials required to construct
said improvements. The amount of said bonds shall be as designated by the City Engineer.
Said bonds shall be executed by a surety company authorized to transact a surety business
in the State of California and must be approved by the City Attorney as to form and by the
City Engineer as to sufficiency. In the event that the DEVELOPER shall fail faithfully to
perform the covenants and conditions of this AGREEMENT, or to make any payment, or
any dedication of land, or any improvements herein required, the CITY shall call on the
surety to perform this AGREEMENT or otherwise indemnify the CITY for the
DEVELOPER'S failure to so do.
B. In lieu of a faithfifl performance sureW bond, the DEVELOPER may elect to secure
this AGREElVIENT by depositing with the CITY:
Cash; or,
A cashier's check, or a certified check payable to the order of the City of
Cupertino; or,
A certificate of deposit, or instrument of credit meeting the requirements of
Government Code Section 66499 (b) or (c).
C. The amount of said cash, checks, certificate of deposit, or instrument of credit shall
be as designated by the City Engineer, and shall be the equivalent to that which would have
been required had the DEVELOPER furnished the CITY with a faithful performance surety
bond. In the event that the DEVELOPER shall fail faithfully to perform the covenants and
conditions of this AGREEMENT, or to make any payment, or any dedication of land, or
any improvements herein required, the CITY may apply the proceeds of said security
thereto.
D. No release of surety bond, cash deposit, check, or certificate of deposit, shall be
made except upon approval of the City Council.
1. Schedule for bond and insurance release for paper bonds are as follows:
A. Release of 90 percent of the faithfifl performance bond
upon acceptance by City Council
Page 5ofll
Bo
Release of the remaining 10 percent of the performance
bond at one year from acceptance after all deficiencies have been
corrected and in the absence of any claim against such bond.
Co
Release of the emire labor and material bond at six months
from acceptance after all deficiencies have been corrected and in the
absence of any claim against such bond.
Liability insurance, provided by the developer to hold the City
harmless in the event of liability arising from the project, to be retired
at the end of one year if all deficiencies have been corrected and in the
absence of any claim against such insurance.
Schedule for Bond and Insurance Release for Cash, CD, Set-Aside Letter
are as Follows:
Release of 45% of bond upon acceptance by City Council.
Release of additional 45% at six months from acceptance
after all deficiencies have been corrected and in the absence of any
claim against such bond.
Release of remaining 10% at one year from date of
acceptance after all deficiencies have been corrected and in the absence
of any claim against such bond.
Release of the liability insurance, provided by the developer or
contractor to hold the City harmless in the event of liability arising from
the subject project, at the end of one year if all deficiencies have been
corrected and in the absence of any claims against such insurance.
No interest shall be paid on any security deposited with the CITY.
CHECKING AND INSPECTION FEE
It is further agreed that DEVELOPER shall pay any and all necessary direct expenses for
inspection, checking, etc., incurred by CITY in connection with said Project, and that
DEVELOPER shall have deposited with CITY, prior to execution of this AGREEMENT,
the mount as set forth herein at Page 2 (Part C.). Should construction cost vary materially
from the estimate from which said sum is calculated, the City Engineer shall notify
DEVELOPER of any additional sum due and owing as a result thereof.
Page 6 of 11
__ 7. MAP CHECKING FEE - NOT APPLICABLE
o
It is further agreed that the DEVELOPER shall deposit with CITY, prior to execution of
this AGREEMENT, for office checking of final map and field checking of street
monuments, in compliance with Section 4:1 of Ordinance No. 47 (Revised 12/04/61) of
CITY, the amount as set forth herein at Page 2 (Part H).
DEVELOPMENT MAINTENANCE DEPOSIT
It is further agreed that the DEVELOPER shall pay to the CITY, prior to execution of this
AGREEMENT, the amount set forth herein at Page 2 (Part D) as a development
maintenance deposit to insure proper dust control and cleaning during the construction
period. The development maiutenanee deposit may be utilized for repairs of defects and
imperfections arising out of or due to faulty workmanship and/or materials appearing in
said work during the period until release of the surety bonds or other security permitted
under paragraph 5.B by the CITY.
Should the DEVELOPER complete the required repairs to the entire satisfaction of the
CITY, the unused balance will be returned after the release of the surety bond or other
security permitted under paragraph 5.B.
STORM DRAINAGE FEE
It is further agreed that the DEVELOPER shall deposit with the CITY, prior to execution
of this AGREEMENT, a storm drainage charge in connection with the said Project in
accordance with the requirements established in Resolution 4422, March 21, 1977, in the
amount as set forth herein at Page 2 (Part E).
10. WATER MAIN EXTENSION DEPOSIT- NOT APPLICABLE
The DEVELOPER further agrees to deposit with the CITY those monies required to
comply with "Policy on Water Main Extensions Work and Deposits" dated 9/30/77. The
deposit shall be held by the CITY until said monies are needed to implement improvements
outlined by the Director of Public Works or improvements outlined within the adopted
Water Master Plan.
The amount shown herein at Part J, Page 2, shall be the full amount due.
11. ONE YEAR POWER COST
It is further agreed that the DEVELOPER shall pay to the cITy prior to execution of this
AGREEMENT, the amount as set forth herein at Page 2 (Part F), which amount represents
the power cost for street lights for one year.
Page 7 of I 1
12. THE INSTALLATION OF STREET TREES
It is further agreed that the DEVELOPER shall, at such time as deemed appropriate by the
City Engineer, plant street trees in conformance with the standards of the City of
Cupertino. Variety of tree shall be selected from the City approved list.
13. PARK FEES - NOT APPLICABLE
It is further agreed that the DEVELOPER shall pay such fees and/or dedicate such land to
the CITY, prior to execution, as is required within Section 18-1.602 Park Land Dedication,
Cupertino Municipal Code, and which is further stipulated under Part I, Page 2 herein. Fees
are also in accordance with action adopted by the City Council on March 19, 1991 and
Chapter 14.05 or Section 18-1.602 of the Cupertino Municipal Code.
14. MAINTENANCE OF WORK
It is further agreed that the DEVELOPER shall maintain the Work until all deficiencies in
the Work are corrected to conform to the Plans and the City Standards and Specifications
for the Work. The DEVELOPER shall, upon written notice thereof, immediately repair or
replace, without cost or obligation to the City of Cupertino, and to the entire satisfaction of
said CITY, all defects and imperfections arising out of or due to faulty workmanship and/or
materials appearing in said Work.
15. SANITARY DISTRICT
It is further agreed that the DEVELOPER shall file with CITY, upon execution of this
AGREEMENT, a letter from the Cupertino Sanitary District stating that the DEVELOPER
has submitted plans for review by the District and that sanitary sewers are available to
serve all lots within said Project.
16. GOVERNMENT CODE
It is further agreed that DEVELOPER shall file with CITY, upon execution of this
AGREEMENT, substantial evidence that all provisions of Section 66493, Article 8, Chapter
4 of the Government Code, pertaining to special assessments or bonds, have been complied
with.
17. PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC/PACIFIC BELL
It is further agreed that the DEVELOPER shall pay to Pacific Gas and Electric Company
and/or to PACIFIC BELL Company any and all fees required for installation of overhead
and/or underground wiring circuits to all electroliers within said property and any and all
fees required for undergrounding as provided in Ordinance No. 331 of CITY when are
Page 8 of 11
notified by either the City Engineer or the Pacific Gas and Electric Company and/or Pacific
Bell Company that said fees are due and payable.
18. EASEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY
It is further agreed that any easement and fight-of-way necessary for completion of the
Project shall be acquired by the DEVELOPER at his own cost and expense.
It is provided, however, that in the event eminent domain proceedings are required the
CITY for the purpose of securing said easement and right-of-way, that the DEVELOPER
shall deposit with CITY a sum covering the reasonable market value of the land proposed
to be taken and to be included in said sum shall be a reasonable allowance for severance
damages, if any. It is further provided that in addition thereto, such sums as may be
required for legal fees and costs, engineering, and other incidental costs in such
reasonable amounts as the CITY may require shall be deposited with the City of
Cupertino.
19. HOLD HARMLESS
It is further agreed that, commencing with the performance of the Work by the
DEVELOPER or his contractor and continuing until the completion of the maintenance of
the Work, the DEVELOPER shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the CITY from
and against any or all loss, cost, expense, damage or liability, or claim thereof, occasioned
by or in any way whatsoever arising out of the performance or nonperformance of the
Work or the negligence or willful misconduct of the DEVELOPER or the DEVELOPER'S
agents, employees and independent contractors, except to the extent any of the foregoing is
caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY or the CITY's agents,
employees and independent contractors.
20. INSURANCE
It is further agreed that: The DEVELOPER shall take out, or shall require any contractor
engaged to perform the work to take out, and maintain at all times during the performance
and maintenance of the work called for or required to be done hereunder, a policy of
insurance naming the CITY and members of the City Council of the City of Cupertino
individually and collectively, and the officers, agents and employees of the CITY
individually and collectively, as insured. Said separate policy shall provide bodily injury
and property damage coverage to the foregoing named CITY and individuals covering all
the Work performed by, for, or on behalf of said DEVELOPER. Both bodily injury and
property damage insurance must be on an occurrence basis; and said policy or policies shall
provide that the coverage afforded thereby shall be primary coverage to the full limit of
liability stated in the declarations, and if the city, its members of the City Council
individually and collectively, and the officers, agents, and employees of the CITY,
individually and collectively, have other insurance against the loss covered by said policy
Page 9 of 11
or policies, that other insurance shall not be called upon to cover a loss under said
additional policy.
The insurance carrier shall provide proof of their ratings. All ratings shall be a minimum
of "Best A-7" in accordance with ABAG policies.
A. Each of said policies of insurance shall provide coverage in the following minimum
amounts: For bodily injury, $100,000 each person; $300,000 each occurrence, property
damage, $50,000 on account of any one occurrence with an aggregate limit of not less than
$200,000.
The DEVELOPER shall file with the City Engineer at or prior to the time of
execution of this AGREEMENT by the DEVELOPER such evidence of said
foregoing policy or policies of insurance as shall be satisfactory to said City
Engineer. Each such policy or policies shall bear an endorsement precluding the
cancellation or reduction in coverage without giving the City Engineer at least ten
(10) days advance notice thereof. The CITY shall be shown as additionally insured
on a separate "Additional Insured Owners, Lessees or Contractors" (Form A) or
(Form B) Endorsement provided along with the evidence of said foregoing policy
of policies of Insurance.
C. In the event that the Project covered herein should be mutually situated in or affect
the area of jurisdiction of a separate municipality or political subdivision of the State of
California, the policies of insurance required herein and above shall co-name such
municipality or political subdivision and the provision set forth herein and above for the
protection of the CITY shall equally apply to municipality and political subdivision.
21. MAPS AND/OR IMPROVEMENT PLANS
It is further agreed that the CITY shall obtain the following map and/or plans at the
DEVELOPER'S expense:
Ao
A mylar blackline and seven (7) prints of fully executed parcel map.
A mylar blackline and ten (10) prints of fully executed improvement plans.
A scan in CAD format of all executed improvement plans and map.
The DEVELOPER agrees to pay the CITY from the development maintenance deposit the
cost for all prints of plans and map required under Item 20.
22. SUCCESSORS
This AGREEMENT shall bind the heirs, administrators, executors, successor, assignee and
transferees of the DEVELOPER. The assignment of this AGREEMENT shall not be
made without approval by the City Council of the City of Cupertino.
Page 10 of 11
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY has caused its name to be hereunto affixed by its Mayor
and City Clerk, thereunto duly authorized by resolmion of the City Council and said
DEVELOPER has hereunto caused his name to be affixed the day and year first above written.
CITY OF CUPERTINO:
Approved as to form:
Mayor
City Attorney
City Clerk
DEVELOPER:
Notary Acknowledgment Required
Exhibit A Attached
Page 11 ofll
RESOLUTION NO. 02-169
DRAFT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
ACCEPTING QUITCLAIM DEED AND AUTHORIZATION FOR
UNDERGROUND WATER RIGHTS FROM GHOLAMREZA JAVANMARD
AND EZAT LOUKZADEH, HUSBAND AND WIFE AS COMMUNITY PROPERTY
WITH RIGHT OF SURVIVORSHIP, 10071 ORANGE AVENUE, APN 357-16-029
WHEREAS, Gholamreza Javanmard and Ezat Loukzadeh have executed a "Quitclaim
Deed and Authorization", which is in good and sufficient form, quitclaiming all their rights in
and authorizing the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, to extract water
from the underground basin, underlying that certain real property situate in the City of Cupertino,
more particularly described as follows:
All that certain real property situate in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State
of California, as shown and delineated on the map filed in the Office of the County
Recorder of the County of Santa Clara on the 11th day of April, 1917 in Book P of Maps
at Page 20.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Cupertino accept said
"Quitclaim Deed and Authorization" so tendered; and
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized to record said
"Quitclaim Deed and Authorization" and this resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 16th day of September, 2002, by the following vote:
Vote
Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
/q- /
QUITCLAIM DEED AND AUTHORIZATION
FOR UNDERGROUND WATER RIGHTS
APN 357-16-029
10071 Orange Avenue
Gholamreza Javanmard and Ezat Loukzadeh~ husband and wife as community
property, with right of survivorship~ hereinafter referred to as the "GRANTOR", this
'~ ~, day of ~,~7/ ,2002, hereby grant, bargain, assign,
convey, remise, release and forever quitclaim unto the CITY OF CUPERTINO, a
municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "GRANTEE", its successors and
assigns, all the right, title, interest, estate, claim and demand, both at law and in equity,
and as well in possession as in expectancy of the GRANTOR as owner of All of Section
43.._.of that certain subdivision of real property situate in the County of Santa Clara, State
of California, and specifically described in the map thereof filed in the Office of the
County Recorder of the County of Santa Clara on the 11th day of April~ 1917 in Book P
of Maps at Page 20~ to pump, take or otherwise extract water from the underground
basin or any underground strata in the Santa Clara Valley for beneficial use upon the
lands overlying said underground basin, and GRANTOR hereby irrevocably authorizes
GRANTEE, its successors and assigns, on behalf of the GRANTOR and its successors in
ownership or overlying lands in the said lots to take from said underground basin within
the said lots any and all water which the owner or owners of said overlying lands may be
entitled to take for beneficial use on said lands and to supply such water to such owner or
owners or others as a public utility; provided, however, that nothing contained in this
instrument shall be deemed to authorize GRANTEE to enter upon any of the lots
delineated upon the above described map or to authorize GRANTEE to make any
withdrawal of water which will result in damage to any building or structure erected upon
said lots.
This assignment, conveyance and authorization is made for the benefit of all of
Section 43 within the above described subdivision and shall bind the owner of said lot
within said subdivision.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GRANTOR has executed this instrument the day and
year first above written.
OWNER:
Fatemeh Asgari
(Acknowledgment and Notarial Seal Attached)
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California }
SS.
County of :_~^/~'./3,, _CL.~. ~41
Date
personally appeared
_3_ ~ $ before me, ~)~\F~O ~c~,~,e~,/. ~c.'7'~J~vPuP~c ,
-- N~e a~d ~tle of-~ce~ (e~.,"Jane D~, Nota~ ~ubl~c")
' ' ' - ' ~ ~me(s~ ~f~igner(s)
oSOnally known to me
ved to me on the basis of satisfacto~
evidence
Place Notary Seal Above
to be the person(j{) whose name~) is/,~3f'e
subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that I~/she/tl~ey executed
the same in b/~/her/tl~ir authorized
capacity(jj~-), and that by bi~/her/tJ~ir
signature(~) on the instrument the person~), or
the entity upon behalf of which the person(~O
acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS n~/haj~d and official seal.
./ V ~'t'¥1/~lnat~i~ofN~ryPublic
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law. it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: (~ .rT.('-/_ ..~. M.
Document Date: "Z-/,?
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Number of Pages: ~¥'
Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer
Signer's Name:
[] Individual
[] Corporate Officer ~ Title(s):
[] Partner ~ [] Limited [] General
[] Attorney in Fact
[] Trustee
[] Guardian or Conservator
[] Other:
Signer Is Representing:
Top of thumb here
1999 Natm~al Notary As~ciation · 9350 De Solo Ave., FO. Box 2402 · Chatswo~h, CA 91313-2402 · wv~,nati~nalnotaly, o~g Prod. No. 5907 Reorder: Call Toil-Frae 1-800-876-~827
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
All that certain real properly situate in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State
of California described as follows:
Being all of Section 43 as shown on that certain Map entitled, "MAP OF SUBDIVISION
"A" MONTA VISTA", filed for record in Book P of Maps at page 20, Santa Clara
County Records.
Prepared by:
Marvin D. Kirkeby
1LC.E. No. 14001
Expires 3/31/2005
RESOLUTION NO. 02-170
DRAFT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES FROM
GHOLAMREZA JAVANMARD AND EZAT LOUKZADEH, HUSBAND AND WIFE
AS COMMUNITY PROPERTY WITH RIGHT OF SURVIVORSHIP, 10071 ORANGE
AVENUE, APN 357-16-029
WHEREAS, Gholamreza Javanmard and Ezat Loukzadeh, have executed a Grant
of Easement for Roadway Purposes which is in good and sufficient form, granting to the
City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State of California, easement over certain real
property for roadway purposes, situate in the City of Cupertino, more particularly
described in Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part hereof, which
is as follows:
All that certain real property situate in the City of Cupertino, County of
Santa Clara, State of California, located at Section 23, 10071 Orange
Avenue, APN 357-16-029.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Cupertino accept said
grant so tendered; and
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized to record
Said grant and this resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 16th day of September, 2002, by the following vote:
Vote
Members of the Ci_ty Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
GRANT OF EASEMENT
FOR ROADWAY PURPOSES
APN 357-16-029
10071 Orange Avenue
Gholamreza Javanmard and Ezat Loukzadeh, husband and wife as communi~, property
with right of survivorship~ grant to the CITY OF CUPERTINO for public roadway purposes,
together with the right to construct, repair, operate, and maintain any and all public utilities and
improvements which shall be or become necessary for preservation of the public safety, welfare
or convenience, the hereinafter described property which is situated in the City of Cupertino,
County of Santa Clara, State of California, and as described as follows:
(See Exhibit "A" & "B")
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, executed this 30day of J/~c,)/, 2002.
Owner:
(Notary acknowledgment to be attached)
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of ~;,,,,~..~, ~,_.~, ;~. ~
'7 Date-
personally appeared
SS.
) ~_~_, before me, ,1.~. ~='.b I:c / z~4.~t ~,,/,~/,q-7';~, ~g ~3 ~SL~ C r
' ' ~ ~am~n~ 6f '~cer (e:g., "jane~,'Nota~ ~ubhc")
~ ' Na~e(s) of Signer(s~
rsonally known to me
oved to me on the basis of satisfacto~
evidence
Place Notary Seal Above
to be the person,(,~ whose name(~') is/,~e
subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that j~/she/t~ey executed
the same in 13~/her/th~ir authorized
capacity(j~S), and that by I~her/~r
signature(x) on the instrument the personJ~}, or
the entity upon behalf of which the person~r)
acted, executed the instrument.
WITNE~ my ha~,q~nd/official seal.
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
Title or Type of Document: _~,, A?'7' C ~c' ~"'/3~ ~'/~. ~P,~ 7'
Document Date: .~/? :.. ? ~ .~,,,. Number of Pages: _.~
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer
Signer's Name:
Individual
Corporate Officer -- Title(s):
Partner -- [] Limited [] General
Attorney in Fact
Trustee
Guardian or Conservator
Other:
Signer Is Representing:
Top of thumb here
1999 National Notaly A_._ _,y~_ _fion · 9350 De So{o Ave.. P.O. Box 2402 · Chatswo~?l, CA 91313-2402 · wwv/.nlllmlal~)la~.oeg Prod. No. 5~07~ Call To~4-Fme 1-8(X)-876-6827
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
All that certain real property situate in the City of Cupertino, County of Santa Clara, State
of California described as follows:
Beginning at the northwesterly comer of Section 43 as shown on that certain Map
entitled, "MAP OF SUBDIVISION "A' MONTA VISTA", filed for record in Book P of
Maps at page 20, Santa Clara County Records; thence along the northerly line &said
Section 13 East 105.15 feet to the northeasterly comer of said Section 43; thence along
the easterly line of said Section 43 South 90.82 feet to the southeasterly comer of said
Section 43; thence along the southerly line of said Section 43 West 10.00 feet; thence
leaving said line North 60.82 feet; thence along a tangent curve to the let~ thru a central
angle ofg0°00'00'' with a radius of 20.00 feet for an are length of 31.42 feet; thence
West 75.15 feet to the westerly line of said Section 43; thence along the westerly line of
said Section 43 North 10.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Said parcel of land containing 1,945.54 square feet or 0.045 acres, more or less.
Prepared by:
Marvin D. Kirkeby
R.C.E. No. 14001
Expires 3/31/2005
CITY OF
CUPEI TINO
City Hall
10300 Torte Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Telephone: (408) 777-3354
FAX: (408) 777-3333
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Summary
AGENDA ITEM '~::~ A I
AGENDA DATE September 16, 2002
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Resolution No. 02- I-] I Authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute an Agreement
between the City and The Guzzardo Partnership, Inc, for the design and construction
administration of the City Center Park (Four Seasons Comer), for a fee not to exceed $101,500,
and authorizing the Director of Public Works to execute up to an additional $15,000 of
Additional Services, as may be required to complete the work; and,
Approval to establish the temporary name to the comer property as "City Center Park" subject to
further review and naming recommendations by the Parks and Recreation Commission.
BACKGROUND
The following general background is provided to help clarify some of the past actions that have
occurred regarding this project.
Past Activities and Design
On June 21, 1993, Council approved the City of Cupertino General Plan. That plan identified the
intersection of Stevens Creek and De Anza and the adjacent parcels as being in the "Heart of the
City" zone and established "Policy 2-2: Heart of the City" with specific strategies for the
accomplishment of the stated objectives. On October 2, 1995, Council enacfed the City's "Heart
of the City Specific Plan", as recommended by the General Plan policy 2-2. The Specific Plan's
Land Use Map identified the southeast comer of the Stevens Creek and De Anza intersection as a
"Permanent Park with Public Use". Appendix A of the Specific Plan referred to the site as "4
Seasons Orchard", an "unfunded improvement".
On December 11, 1996, Council adopted resolution No. 9751 which approved the concept of an
agreement with Symantec/Cupertino City Center Builders, now called Cupertino City Center
Owners Association (OA), for the installation of park space and streetscape improvements on
the site. This conceptual agreement evolved into a License Agreement for Four Seasons Park,
which was approved by resolution on May 5, 1997 and entered into on June 26, 1997. The
License Agreement identified the owner of the property as the "OA" and it granted the City non-
exclusive, irrevocable license to develop and use the property as a public park with some
limitations.
Printed on Recycled Paper ~ /-~ [
In August 1998, according to archived City documents, the Director of Parks selected The
Guzzardo Partnership and Recreation, using an RFP process, to provide Schematic Design and
Design Development services at what was then referred to as Four Seasons Park. During
February and March 1999, The Guzzardo Partnership prepared additional landscape design
alternatives for the Parks and Recreation Department and presented those alternatives to
members of the Parks and Recreation Commission. Following these presentations, the City took
no apparent action on the Park alternatives for the next 30 months, until August of 2001 as noted
below.
Recent Activities related to the Verona and Cypress projects
On December 12, 2000, the License Agreement was amended to more accurately define the
boundaries of the park footprint with respect to the Verona Apartment project and the Cypress
Hotel project, as construction on both was soon to begin.
On August 24, 2001, a Design "charette" (a design brainstorming session to generate design
principles and criteria for a particular project) was conducted by the Director of Community
Development and attended by several members of the development and design community,
including The Guzzardo Parmership. The stated objective was to generate design ideas to help
achieve the development of Four Seasons Comer (Park), which had not been addressed since
August of 1999. Approximately $20,000 in fees was paid to The Guzzardo Partnership in the
three years between their selection in August 1998 and October 2001.
Current Design Efforts and Project Development
In October of 2001, Public Works Department assumed responsibility for developing the project,
as defined in the adopted 2000-2001 Capital Improvement program (CIP). Staff contacted Paul
Lettieri, a principal of The Guzzardo Partnership, to discuss the history of the design to that
point. Staff learned that Paul was also providing landscape services to both Prometheus and
Kimpton, the two adjoining properties of the plaza. The fact that The Guzzardo Partnership had
been previously selected with an RFP process combined with Mr. Lettieri's considerable
landscape architectural expertise and knowledge of the site and the adjoining properties, was
deemed sufficient criteria for selecting his firm to continue the plaza design.
Between October of 2001 and February of 2002, working with city staff, Paul Lettieri reevaluated
the older landscape and gateway plans using the objectives from the General Plan, the Specific
Plan and the August 2001 design charette. Minor changes were made to the concept plans,
including the informal adoption of the project title of City Center Park. Additional analyses were
made of the project cost and staff determined that the existing budget was insufficient to achieve
even the most elemental objectives. Plan changes and a new budget were presented to Council
in May of 2002 for concept review and consideration. Council considered the concept and
budget recommendation and at the end of June 2002, adopted the 2003-2003 CIP, which
included $1.1 million for the development of the Plaza.
It should be noted that Council authorization for a public art design agreement with Roger Berry,
is being sought under a separate but related action. Following Council consideration of this
Guzzardo agreement and the related Roger Berry agreement, if approved, staff will proceed with
the development of Plaza design documents necessary for Planning Commission review and
presentation to Council for approval, and ultimately for construction.
Staff anticipates that a City Center Plaza design, which incorporates the Roger Berry sculpture,
will be brought to Council for review and approval by November 2002. Construction, depending
on the Verona Apartments project schedule (i.e., clearing of the site now used for construction
staging) would be expected to begin in January and be substantially complete in May of 2003.
FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of this recommendation will encumber $116,500 which is available in the approved
FY 2002 - 2003 Capital Improvement Program, Fund No. 425-9313.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adoption of Resolution No.02 ., authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute an
agreement with The Guzzardo Partnership, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $101,500 to provide
professional design services for the design and contract administration services for the City
Center Park (Four Seasons Comer), and authorizing the Director of Public Works to expend an
additional $15,000 for Additional Services, as may be required to complete the work.
Approve establishing the temporary name to the to the Four Seasons comer property as "City
Center Park" subject to further review and naming recommendations by the Parks and Recreation
Commission.
Submitted by:
Ralph A. Qualls, Jr.
Director of Public Works
Approved for submission:
David W. Knapp
City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 02-171
DRAFT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE GUZZARDO PARTNERSHIP, INC. FOR
THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION OF CITY CENTER PARK FOR
A FEE NOT TO EXCEED $101,500 AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
WORKS TO EXECUTE UP TO AN ADDITIONAL $15,000 OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES
AS MAY BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE WORK
WHEREAS, The Guzzardo Partnership, Inc. was selected to design the area known as
Four Seasons comer property, located on the southeast comer of Stevens Creek Boulevard and
De Anza Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted the Fiscal Year 2002/03 Capital Improvement
Projects which included $1.1 million for development of Four Seasons comer; and
WHEREAS, staff has negotiated a fee with The Guzzardo Partnership, In~. in the amount
of $101,500 for design and construction administration of said property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino
hereby approves the aforementioned agreement and authorizes the City Manager to negotiate and
execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Cupertino.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Director of Public Works has been authorized to
execute up to an additional $15,000 of additional services as may be required to complete the
project.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that Four Seasons comer property shall be temporarily
known as City Center Park subject to further review and name recommendations by the Parks
and Recreation Commission.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 16th day of September, 2002, by the following vote:
Vote
Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
CITY OF
cUPEKnNO
City Hall
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Telephone: (408) 777-3354
FAX: (408) 777-3333
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Summary
AGENDA ITEM
AGENDA DATE September 16, 2002
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Resolution No. 02 - I"L~, Authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute an Agreement
between the City and Roger Berry, Artist, for the design, fabrication, and installation of a piece
of public art at City Center Park (Four Seasons Comer) ,called "Perspectives", for a fee not to
exceed $143,788.
BACKGROUND
On May 20, 2002, Council approved, a concept proposed by Artist Roger Berry for a sculpture,
proposed to be located in City Center Plaza on the southeast comer of Stevens Creek and De
Anza.
On June 17, 2002, Council adopted the Fiscal Year 2002 / 2003 Capital Improvement Projects,
which included $150,000 for the design and fabrication of a sculpture for City Center Plaza.
It should be noted that Council authorization for the design of City Center Plaza, by the
Guzzardo Partnership, is being sought under a separate but related action. Following Council
approval of this Roger Berry agreement and the related Guzzardo agreement, staff will be able to
proceed with the development of Plaza design documents necessary for Planning Commission
review and ultimately, Council approval.
Staff anticipates that a City Center Plaza design, which incorporates the Roger Berry sculpture,
will be forwarded to the Council for review and consideration in November 2002.
FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of this recommendation will encumber $143,788 in the approved FY 2002 - 2003
Capital Improvement Program, Fund No. 425-9314.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 02~, authorizing execution of an
agreement for $143,788, with Roger Berry to provide design, fabrication and installation services
for the public art piece called "Perspectives".
Submitted by:
Ralph A. Qualls, Jr.
Director of Public Works
Approved for submission:
David W. Knapp
City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 02-172
DRAFT
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND ROGER BERRY FOR DESIGN, FABRICATION
AND INSTALLATION OF A PIECE OF PUBLIC ART AT CITY CENTER PARK FOR A
FEE NOT TO EXCEED $143,788
WHEREAS, on May 20, 2002, the City of Cupertino approved a concept proposed by
Artist Roger Berry for a sculpture to be located at City Center Plaza on the southeast comer of
Stevens Creek Boulevard and De Anza Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, on June 27, 2002, the City Council adopted the Fiscal Year 2002/03 Capital
Improvement Projects which included $150,000 for the design and fabrication of a sculpture for
City Center Plaza; and
WHEREAS, staff has negotiated a fee with Roger Berry in the amount of $143,788 for
design, fabrication, and installation of a piece of public art, a sculpture entitled "Perspectives"
for City Center Plaza; and
WHEREAS, the provisions, terms, and conditions of the aforementioned agreement have
been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and the City Manager.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino
hereby approves the aforementioned agreement and authorizes the City Manager to negotiate and
execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Cupertino.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Director of Public Works has been authorized to
execute up to an additional $75,000 of additional services as may be required to complete the
project.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 16th day of September, 2002, by the following vote:
Vote
Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
CITY OF
CUPEI TINO
City of Cupertino
10300 Torte Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
Fax: (408) 777-3333
Community Development Department
Housing Services
Summary
Agenda Item No. ~c~
Agenda Date: September 16, 2002
Application: U-2002-03, EA-2002-05, EXC-2002-04
Applicant (s): Hunter/Storm Associates
Property Location: APN#s: 369-40-002, 369-40-015, 369-40-016 and 369-40-017 - Cupertino
Town Center
Application Summary:
USE PERMIT to construct a new 28,000 square foot office building with a 46 car
underground parking garage and a 2,500 square foot retail space (southwest comer of the
intersection of Rodrigues and Torre Avenues) and demolish two existing professional office
buildings (Buildings 4 & 5) totaling 10,096 square feet to create a temporary parking lot at
Cupertino Town Center.
HEART OF THE CITY SPECIFIC PLAN EXCEPTION to exceed the maximum height limit
from 36 ft. to 45 ft.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends approval of:
1. Mitigated Negative Declaration, file number EA-2002-05
2. The Heart of the City exception, file number EXC-2002-04, in accordance with the
Planning Commission resolution No. 6141.
3. The Use Permit application, file number U-2002-03, in accordance with the Planning
Commission resolution No. 6140.
Staff recommends a modification to the condition of approval No. 13 in Section IV of
the Planning Commission resolution Nos. 6140 and 6141.
13. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources
Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be
included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion and or sediment
control plan shall be provided. All paving in the plaza will consist of pavers on
sand to increase permeabili .ty and reduce impacts to the storm drain system
Applications: U-2002-03, EA-2002-05, EXC-2002-04 Hunter/Storm Associates
September 16, 2002
Page 2
Project Data:
General Plan Designation: Commercial/Office/Residential
Zoning Designation:
Specific Plan:
Project Consistency with:
General Plan:
Zoning:
Specific Plan:
Environmental Assessment:
Mitigated Negative Declaration
P/P(OP) - Planned Office/Planned Professional Office
Heart of the City
Yes.
Yes. Office and incidental/related commercial uses
allowed in the P (OP)- Planned Office.
Exception required to exceed maximum height limit
from 36 ft. to 45 ft.
BACKGROUND
On August 19, 2002, the City Council continued this application to September 16, 2002, to
evaluate the project proposal in the context of the proposed Master Plan. All enclosed
materials for the proposed project are similar to the previous packet. A separate City
Council study session for the Master Plan is scheduled for 4:30PM on September 16, 2002.
A staff report has been prepared for the study session.
DISCUSSION
The proposed project is part of the master plan for a mixed-use development at the existing
Town Center office complex east of De Anza Boulevard between Rodriguez Avenue and
Pacifica Avenue (see attached plan set). The original concept for the mixed-use project
submitted in 2001 consisted of office, retail, and residential uses, and received City Council
authorization to initiate a General Plan amendment from the City Council to allocate
residential units, office square footage and building heights. Neighbors expressed concerns
related to traffic, parking, height of buildings and the general plan amendment for the
project.
The revised master plan retains the original mixed-use office/retail/residential concept
with a reduction of office space and building heights, and an increase in residential units.
The proposed project conforms to the Master Plan in terms of site plan issues, streetscape
and design.
If the Council is satisfied that the proposed project is consistent with the Master Plan, it can
be approved as recommended by the Planning Commission. Alternatively, if the Council
finds that the proposed project needs additional work to be consistent with the Master Plan,
it can be referred back to the Planning Commission with direction.
Applications: U-2002-03, EA-2002-05, EXC-2002-04 Hunter/Stortn Associates
September 16, 2002
Page 3
SUBM
Pmseck~, D~rector
of Community Development
APPROVED BY:
David W. Knapp, City Manager
ENCLOSURES
Staff Report for the City Council public hearing, August 19, 2002
Planning Commission Resolution No. 6140, July 8, 2002
Planning Commission Resolution No. 6141, July 8, 2002
Staff Report for the Planning Commission public hearing, July 8, 2002 including:
· Exhibit A: Traffic Report prepared by Fehr and Peers dated June 2002
· Exhibit B: Architectural Consultant Review Letter dated March 29, 2002
· Exhibit C: Concept plan for traffic calming on Rodrigues Avenue
· Initial Study
· Recommendation of the Environmental Review Committee
Negative Declaration
Planning Commission minutes, July 8, 2002
Plan set
G:\ Planning\ PDREPORT\ pcUsereports\ U-2002-03cc2.doc
CITY OF
CUPE INO
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
Fax: (408) 777-3333
Community Development Department
Housing Services
Summary
Agenda Item No. __
Agenda Date: ..August 19, 2002
Application: U-2002-03, EA-2002-05, EXC-2002-04
Applicant (s): Hunter/Storm Associates
Property Location: APN#s: 369-40-002, 369-40-015, 369-40-016 and 369-40-017 - Cupertino
Town Center
Application Summary:
USE PERMIT to construct a new 28,000 square foot office building with a 46 car
underground parking garage and a 2,500 square foot retail space (southwest comer of the
intersection of Rodrigues and Torre Avenues) and demolish two existing professional office
buildings (Buildings 4 & 5) totaling 10,096 square feet to create a temporary parking lot at
Cupertino Town Center.
HEART OF THE CITY SPECIFIC PLAN EXCEPTION to exceed the maximum height limit
from 36 ft. to 45 fL
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommends approval of:
I. Mitigated Negative Declaration, file number EA-2002-05
2. The Heart of the City exception, file number EXC-2002-04, in accordance with the
Planning Commission resolution No. 6141.
3. The Use Permit application, file number U-2002-03, in accordance with the Planning
Commission resolution No. 6140.
Staff recommends a modification to the condition of approval No. 13 in Section IV of
the Planning Commission resolution Nos. 6140 and 6141.
13. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources
Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soft. BMP plans shall be
included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion and or sediment
control plan shall be provided. All paving in the plaza will consist of pavers on
sand to increase permeability and reduce impacts to the storm drain system.
Printed on Recycled Paper
Applications: U-2002-0~'!'~-2002-05, EXC-2002-04 Hunter/S~/~ Associates
August 19, 2002
Page 2
Project Data:
General Plan Designation: Commerdal/Office/Residential
Zoning Designation:
Specific Plan:
Project Consistency with:
General Plan:
Zoning:
Specific Plan:
Environmental Assessment:.
Mitigated Negative Declaration
P/P(OP) - Planned Office/Planned Professional Office
Heart of the City
Yes.
Yes. Office and incidental/related commercial uses
allowed in the P (OP)- Planned Office.
Exception required to exceed maximum height limit
from 36 fL to 45 fL
BACKGROUND
Master Plan
The proposal is the first phase of the master plan for a mixed-use development at the
existing Town Center office complex east of De Anza Boulevard between Rodriguez
Avenue and Pacifica Avenue (see attached plan seQ.
The original concept for the mixed-use project submitted in 2001, proposed to replace
130,200 square feet of mostly professional and medical office uses with 223,338 square feet
of office space, 194 residential units and 31,960 square feet of retail space. The project
received City Council authorization to initiate a General Plan amendment from the City
Council to allocate residential density, office square footage and building heights.
Neighbors expressed concerns related to traffic, parking, height of buildings and the
general plan amendment for the project.
The revised master plan retains the original mixed-use office/retail/residential concept
with a reduction of office space and building heights. The revised master plan will be
scheduled for a Planning Commission study session.
DISCUSSION
Phase 1 Proposal
The applicants propose to construct a 28,000 sq.ft, two-story office building and a 46-car
underground parking garage on the parking lot at the southwest comer of Rodrigues and
Torte Avenues. A 2,500 sq.fL retail/restaurant building is also proposed on the site at the
comer of Town Center Lane and Torre Avenue. The two buildings are separated by a plaza
because of a utility easement that runs between them. Two existing professional office
buildings (Buildings 4 & 5) totaling 10,096 square feet are proposed to be demolished to
create a temporary parking lot. The applicants met with the neighborhood regarding the
proposed Phase 1 project. The public was generally satisfied with the overall appearance of
Applications: U-2002-0~:":i~A-2002-05, EXC-2002-04 Hunter/St0fm Associates
August 19, 2002
Page 3
the project~ Traffic, parking and safety (in underground parking garages) were cited as
neighborhood concerns.
General Plan and Zoning
The General Plan designation is Commercial/Office/Residential and allows office floor
area ratio (FAR) of 0.33. The project site is currently zoned P (OP) - (Planned Office with
office, prototype research and incidental commercial uses). The proposed project will
result in an overall office FAR of 0.33, which is consistent with the General Plan. The
project also includes 2,500 square feet of commercial use, which will be allocated from the
commercial pool for the Heart of the City. Therefore, the Phase 1 proposal is consistent with
the General Plan and Zoning.
Heart Of The City_ Specific Plan
The Heart of the City Specific Plan was developed to guide future development along
Stevens Creek Boulevard and the Town Center area. The Phase 1 proposal is generally
consistent with the Heart of the City Specific Plan but requires a height exception as follows:
· Height Exception Findings - The General Plan height limit for this site is 30-45 feet, but
the Heart of the City height limit is 36 feet. The proposed office building requires a
height exception since the roof peak is 45 feet above grade. Section 1.01.030 A 3 b of the
Heart of the City Development Standards allows for height exceptions, subject to
City review, up to 45 feet in height for sloping portions of roofs provided they are
gable roofs not exceeding a 6:12 slope. Staff supports the exception for height since
the proposed building meets the Heart of the City exception findings.
Architectural Design
The office and retail buildings are designed in a "net-Mediterranean" architectural style
and are oriented toward the comer of Torte Avenue and Town Center Lane. The office
building is two stories high with an underground parking garage and entries on the plaza
facing Town Center Lane and Torte Avenue. The facades are articulated with an entry
tower and arcade, building plane changes and inset windows. The materials proposed for
the building are of a high quality and consist of a limestone base, beige color stucco for the
main body of the building, inset wood windows in a dark brown, and terracotta color
concrete tile for the pitched roof. The retail/cafe building is built in the same style and
with the same materials as the office building. However, it has "Tuscan Yellow" walls and'
additional features including an octagonal comer entry feature, awnings, storefront
windows, and trellises to differentiate it from the office use.
The plaza is raised 2'-6" above the sidewalk and is proposed to be scored concrete in a
terracotta color (a condition of approval requires pavers on sand in the plaza to improve
water permeability). The plaza is landscaped with planters and trees. Street furniture
including benches, outdoor dining furniture, planter pots and trashcans, and lighting are
also designed to coordinate with the buildings. The architecture, plaza, landscaping and
Applications: U-2002-03,'£A-2002-05, EXC-2002-04 Hunter/StOrm Associates
August 19, 2002
Page 4
street trees along Torre and Rodriguez Avenues will help create an inviting and pedestrian-
friendly atmosphere.
Traffic & Circulation
A traffic report was prepared by Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. in June 2002 (Exhibit A)
indicating conditions for Phase 1 and for proposed project build-out
· Year 2010 Impacts Of Master Plan at B,;ld,_~f - The analysis indicated that for Year 2010
conditions for master plan buildout, the intersection at De Anza Boulevard and
McClellan Road (PM peak hour) would operate at LOS E during the PM peak hour. The
project at buildout is expected to contribute to about 1% of the total traffic at the
intersection and Phase 1 traffic about 0.2%. Staff is exploring a design for the
intersection of De Anza Boulevard and McClellan Road to enable it to function more
efficiently, as described in the traffic report (page 42). The applicant will be required to
contribute their proportionate share of the cost to redesign the McClellan/De Anza
signal.
· Cut Through Traffic - Estimated trips on Rodrigues Avenue include 106 daily trips or
about 3% of daily traffic (10 PM peak hour trips) east of Torre Avenue. Estimated
trips east of Torre Avenue include 38 daytime trips or less than 2% of daily traffic (4
PM peak hour trips). The analysis assumed that' the.gate at Pacifica would not be in
operation. A condition of approval will requireth~' applicant to provide
neighborhood traffic mitigation on Rodrigues Avenue.
On-Street Parking - The applicants propose to provide angled p'arking on Torte Avenue
in the final Master plan. Staff recommends that Phase 1 be approved with the inclusion
of angled parking on the west side of Torre Avenue along the project frontage and
including the bulb-outs on both sides of Town Center Lane (shown on sheet A-I). This
will provide an additional 5 spaces along the street and help to create a pedestrian-
oriented streetscape between the project and Civic Center. Public Works has reviewed
and approved the plan. A condition of approval requires a bond from the applicant
for the construction of the parking spaces south of Town Center Lane (sheet MP of
the plan set) if construction on the master plan does not proceed within two years
from the date of the approval of Phase 1.
Civic Center Special Events
The applicant has agreed to allow public parking on the site during special events in the
Civic Center. A condition of approval is included to this effect.
Storm Water Quality Management
The Regional Water Quality Control Board is requiring local agencies to reduce
impervious surface and incorporate storm water quality design techniques in their new
projects. The current project site is paved asphalt parking lot. The project (including
temporary parking lot) will increase landscaping area by 378 square feet, thereby
Applications: U-2002-03~":~EA-2002-05, EXC-2002-04 Hunter/St0~ Associates
August 19, 2002
Page 5
reducing impervious surface area. Staff is recommending modifying condition of
approval Section IV, No. 13 to addrequire that the plaza paving consist of pavers on
sand to increase permeability and reduce negative impacts to the storm drain system.
Environmental Review
The Planning Commission recommended a Mitigated Negative Declaration with
mitigations related to traffic, parking and landscaping. The mitigations are included in
the project or incorporated into the conditions of approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION ISSUES
On July 8, 2002, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved the use permit and
exception application 3-0-0 (one member was absent and another recused himself).
Overall, they were pleased with the development plan. Concerns raised and addressed
at the meeting are listed below:
· Master plan - One member of the Commission commented that since the Phase 1
project would set the entire tone for the master plan, it would be preferable to
continue the item until the entire master plan was brought forward. The rest of the
Commission felt comfortable moving forward with the first phase. The Commission
finally approved the project.
· Temporary_ parking lot - The Commission was in favor of providing parking only
around the perimeter of the temporary lot and creating a central grassy area and
recommended that the lot should be paved only if the parking demand increased. A
condition of approval is added to reflect this issue.
· Traffic calming plan- The Commission also indicated that the design for traffic
calming on Rodrigues and Torte Avenues should come back to Planning
Commission for approval. A condition of approval have been added to address the
this issue.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Two members of the public commented on the development at the Planning
Commission meeting. One of the speakers was generally supportive of the
development. However he was concerned about the safety of children required to cross
De Anza Boulevard because of the recent school redistricting proposals. He was also'
interested in ensuring that Rodrigues and Torre Avenues were safer for children to
walk because they were designated safe school routes. Another speaker was supportive
of the efforts of the applicants in working with the neighborhood to reduce height and
intensity of the original development. He also reiterated concerns regarding school
routes. The traffic calming plans for Rodrigues Avenue and the streetscape plan for
Torre Avenue will address pedestrian and bike safety issues.
Applications: U-2002-03;'EA-2002-05, EXC-2002-04 Hunter/Stmi~ Associates
August 19, 2002
Page 6
Steve Piasecki, Director
of Community Development
APPROVED BY:
David W. Knapp, City Manager
ENCLOSURES
Planning Commission Resolution No. 6140, July 8, 2002
Planning Commission Resolution No. 6141, July 8, 2002
Staff Report for the Planning Commission public hearing, July 8, 2002 including:
· Exhibit A: Traffic Report prepared by Fehr and Peers dated June 2002
· Exhibit B: Architectural Consultant Review Letter dated March 29, 2002
· Exhibit C: Concept plan for traffic calming on Rodrigues Avenue
· Initial Study
· Recommendation of the Environmental Review Committee
Negative Declaration
Planning Commission minutes, July 8, 2002
Plan set
G:\Planning\PDREPORT~CCkU-2002-03cc.doc
U-2002-03
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torte Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 6140 & 6141
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEMOLITION
OF 10,096 SQUARE FEET OF MEDICAL/PROFESSIONAL OFFICE SPACE AND THE
CONSTRUCTION OF 28,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE SPACE, 2,500 SQUARE FEET
OF RETAIL/RESTAURANT SPACE AND A TEMPORARY PARKING LOT ON A
12.33 GROSS ACRE SITE.
SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
U-2002-03, EA-2002-05, EXC-2002-04
Hunter/Storm Associates
Southwest corner of Rodrigues Avenue and Torre Avenue
(APN#s: 369-40-002, 369-40-015, 369-40-016 and 369-40-017 -
Cupertino Town Center)
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application
for a Use Permit, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the
Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held
one or more public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said
application; and has satisfied the following requirements:
1. The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to
property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety, general welfare, or convenience;
2. The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the
Cupertino General Plan and the purpose of this title.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, application no. U-2002-03 is hereby recommended for
approval; and
35 -It;
Resolution No. 6140 & 6i41 U-2002-03
Page 2
July 8, 2002
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning
Application U-2002-03, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting
of July 8, 2002, and are incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1.
APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on plan set dated June 20, 2002, entitled "Civic Park Phase One,
and as amended by this resolution.
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
Approval is granted for the removal of 10,096 square feet of medical/professional
office space and the construction'of 28,000 square feet of an office building, a 2,500
square foot of retail/restaurant building and a temporary parking lot, with an
allocation of 2,500 square feet of new retail space from the City retail pool.
o
DESIGN
a. Windows - All windows shall be inset at least three inches from the exterior wall
surface.
b. Lighting - A comprehensive lighting plan will be provided to detail accent
lighting on buildings, signage and landscaping and will not cause spillover to
neighboring properties or the public right-of-way.
c. Signage - All signage shall be consistent with the Sign Code Title 17.
Alternatively, a master sign program will need to be approved by the Planning
Commission.
BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL
The Director of Community Development shall review the final building permits for
full conformance with this approval and the design approval prior to issuance of
building permits.
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN
A construction management plan shall be prepared by the applicant and approved
by staff prior to issuance of building permits. Staging of construction equipment
shall not occur within 250 feet of any residential property.
LANDSCAPING
a. Replacement trees - All the replacement trees shall be 48" box size minimum
except for the Japanese Maples on the parking deck
b. Protection plan - As part of the building permit drawings, a tree protection plan
shall be prepared by a landscape architect or certified arborist for the heritage
oaks affected by the construction and the six redwoods to be relocated. The tree
Resolution No. 6140 & 6't41 U-2002-03
Page 3
July 8, 2002
protection shall be inspected and approved by the landscape architect prior to
beginning construction.
o
TEMPORARY PARKING LOT
Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a bond to guarantee
the reconstzuction of the temporary parking lot to comply with City codes
(including surfacing and landscaping), to be used if construction of the master plan
does not begin within two years of approval of Phase 1. The temporary parking lot
shall be initially designed with paved parking around the perimeter with grass on
the interior. Repaying of spaces in the grassed area shall be constructed as needed.
o
PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN
A parking management plan shall be prepared by the applicant that describes the
parking system used by retail customers, office clients and retail/office employees
and shall be subject to staff approval prior to final occupancy. The applicant shall
provide an updated plan for any tenant changes that result in changes to the
parking requirements.
9,
ON-STREET PARKING ALONG TORRE AVENUE
a. As part of Phase 1, the applicant shall construct angled parking and sidewalk
improvements on the west side of Torre Avenue along the project frontage as
shown on sheet A-1 on the plan set. The bulb-outs on either side of Town Center
Lane shall be incorporated into the plan. The applicants shall demonstrate
alignment with the planned Civic Plaza improvements.
b. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a bond for the
construction of the angled parking spaces south of Town Center Lane (as shown
on sheet MP of the plan.set) to be used if construction on the master plan does
not proceed within two years from the date of the approval of Phase 1.
10. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) MEASURES
The applicant shall implement the TDM measures recommended in the
Transportation Impact Analysis for Town Center Phase 1 Development by Fehr &
Peers Associates, Inc. dated June 2002. The applicant shall install one secured
bicycle-locking device, such as a bicycle rack, for the retail/restaurant building. In
addition, six enclosed bicycle lockers shall be provided in the underground parking,
garage for the two-story office building.
11. TRAFFIC CALMING ALONG RODRIGUES AVENUE
The applicant, as part of Phase 1, shall provide neighborhood traffic mitigation on
Rodrigues Avenue. This mitigation will include traffic calming measures such as
on-street parking (to off-set parking deficiencies), traffic curb bulb-outs and/or other
traffic mitigation measures, as deemed appropriate, to offset the project traffic along
Rodrigues Avenue (see Exhibit C for concept plan). The final plan will be finalized
by staff (Planning and Public Works) in conjunction with the traffic consultant and
Resolution No. 6140 & 6141
Page 4
U-2002-03
July 8, 2002
shall be approved by the Planning Commission prior to construction. Total
contribution for Phase 1 shall not exceed $50,000.
12. DE ANZA BOULEVARD/McCLELLAN ROAD INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS
As part of Phase 1, the applicant shall contribute their proportionate share of the
cost to redesign the McClellan/De Anza signal to enable it to function more
efficiently, as described in the traffic report (page 42). The applicant's proportionate
share will equal the increment of new traffic added to the intersection compared to
the new traffic from the near term build-out in the surrounding area. Total
contribution for Phase 1 shall not exceed $50,000.
13. CIVIC CENTER SPECIAL EVENTS
The applicant shall allow public parking on the Town Center site for special events in
the Civic Center. The terms and conditions of the agreement (including times and
responsibilities) shall be determined by the Director of Community Development, City
Attorney and the applicant.
14. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults, backflow preventers and similar above
ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or
located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street
areas. Said equipment locations shall be determined prior to issuance of building
permits.
15. SANITARY DISTRICT
Prior to obtaining a permit for occupancy, the applicant shall provide written
confirmation from the Cupertino Sanitary District that adequate capacity is available
for the project or the applicant shall make the necessary improvements to ensure
adequate capacity for t_he project.
16. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice
of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications,
reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day
approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and
other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you
fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements
of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions.
17. PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT
Pedestrian easements over the sidewalk area and through the interior pedestrian
paths and plaza shall be prepared by the developer, approved by the City Attorney
and recorded against the subject property prior to issuance of building permits.
Resolution No. 6140 & 6'~i U-2002-03
July 8, 2002
Page 5
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
STREET WIDENING
Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance
with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer.
CURB AND G~R IMPROVEMENTS
Curbs and gUtters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance
with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer.
o
STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION
Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer.
Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of
visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the
maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located.
4. FIRE HYDRANT
Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City.
5. TRAFFIC SIGNS
Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City.
STREET TREES
Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type
approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125.
o
GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with
Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits
maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water
Quality Control Board as appropriate.
o
DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pre and Post-
development calculations must be provided to identify how much runoff will be
directed to our storm draha facilities.
9. FIRE PROTECTION
Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new const~'uction to the approval of the City.
10. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES
The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities
Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of
Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of
underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing
Resolution No. 6140 & 6i~i U-2002-03
Page 6
July 8, 2002
utility underground provisions. Said plans sh~ll be subject to prior approval of the
affected Utility provider and the City Engineer.
11. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of
Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and
inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for undergrounding
of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction
per~-dts.
f. Map Checking Fees:
g. Park Fees:
Fees:
a. Checking & Inspection Fees: $ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $2,268.00
b. Grading Permit: $ 6% of Site Improvement Cost
c. Development Maintenance Deposit:$ 3,000.00
d. Storm Drainage Fee: $ 2,420/acre
e. Power Cost: **
N/A
N/A
Bonds:
Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements
Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement
On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements.
The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted
by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of
recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change
or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule.
** Developer is required for one-year power cost for streetlights
12. FIRE ACCESS LANES
Emergency fire access lanes shall be recorded as fire lane easements on the final map
and shah meet Central Fire District standards.
13. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water
Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans
shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. Erosion and or
sediment control plan shall be provided.
14. DIAGONAL PARKING
Resolution No. 6140 & 6~i U-2002-03 '"':~'~'
Page 7
July 8, 2002
Diagonal parking can be constructed along the western side of Torte Avenue.
Additional right of way needed to accommodate this diagonal parking must be
attained from the applicant's portion of the lot, not the City's.
15. TRASH ENCLOSURES
The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
and the Director of Community Development. Clearance by the Public Works and
Community Development Department is needed prior to obtaining a building
permit.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of July 2002, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS: Chen, Saadati, Wong and Chairperson Auerbach
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS: Corr
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
/s/Steve Piasecki
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
/s/Marc Auerbach
Marc Auerbach, Chairperson
Cupertino Planning Commission
G: \ Planning \ PDREPORT\ RES \ U-2002-03 res.doc
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM
Application: U-2002-03, EA-2002-05, EXC-2002-04 Agenda Date: July 8, 2002
Applicant (s): Hunter/Storm Assodates
Property Location: APN#s: 369-40-002, 369-40-015, 369-40-016 and 369-40-017 - Cupertino
Town Center
Project Data:
General Plan Designation: Commercial/Office/Residential
Zoning Designation:
Specific Plan:
Project Consistency with:
General Plan:
Zoning:
Specific Plan:
Environmental Assessment:.
Negative Declaration
P/P(OP) - Planned Office/Planned Professional Office
Heart of the City
Yes.
Yes. Office and incidental/related commercial uses
allowed in the P (OP)- Planned Office.
Exception required to exceed maximum height limit
from 36 ft. to 45 ft.
Application Summary:
Use Permit to construct a new 28,000 square foot office building with a 46 car underground
parking garage and a 2,500 square foot retail space (southwest comer of the intersection of
Rodrigues and Torte Avenues) and demolish two existing professional office buildings
(Buildings 4 & 5) totaling 10,096 square feet to create a temporary parking lot at Cuperlino
Town Center. The application includes an exception to the Heart of the City Specific Plan
to exceed the maximum height limit from 36 ft to 45 ft.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of:
1. Mitigated Negative Declaration, file number EA-2002-05
2. The Heart of the City exception, file number EXC-2002-04, subject to the model
resolution.
3. The Use Permit application, file number U-2002-03, in accordance with the model
resolution.
BACKGROUND
Master Plan
The proposal is the first phase of the master plan for a mixed-use development at the
existing Town Center office complex east of De Anza Boulevard between Rodriguez
Avenue and Pacifica Avenue (see attached plan set). The original concept for the mixed-
use project submitted in 2001, proposed to replace 130,200 square feet of mostly
Applications: U-2002-0¥~EA-2002-05, EXC-2002-04 Hunter/St0~m Associates
July 8, 2002
Page 2
professional and medical office uses with 223,338 square feet of office space, and construct
194 residential units and 31,960 square feet of retail space. The project was planned around
a central 0.5 acre park linking it to City Hall. The project required General Plan
amendments to increase the square footage allocation for office space, residential density
and heights beyond the allowable amount in the General Plan and the Heart of the City
Specific Planning Area. The project received authorization to initiate a General Plan
amendment from the City Council on February 5, 2001.
The applicants met with the neighborhood in a series of four meetings in the summer of
2001 regarding the original master plan. Notices were sent to residents within a 1000-foot
radius of the project site. The primary concerns expressed at the meetings were traffic,
parking, height of buildings and the general plan amendment for the project. The applicant
intends to submit a revised master plan within the next 60 days. The revised plan will
retain the original mixed-use office/retail/residential concept with a reduction of office
space and building heights. The applicants met with the neighborhood regarding the
proposed Phase 1 project. The public was generally satisfied with the overall appearance of
the project~ Traffic, parking and safety (in underground parking garages) were cited as
neighborhood concerns.
Phase 1 Proposal
The proposed project site at the southwest comer of Rodrigues and Torte Avenues is
currently a parking lot and was identified in the original Master plan as a residential and
retail/restaurant building with a parking garage. Two existing office buildings in the Town
Center complex (Buildings 4 and 5) totaling 10,096 square feet are proposed to be
demolished in Phase 1 to provide a temporary parking lot for the project site. The
following table indicates the various uses including existing, Phase 1 and proposed
bufldout.
Existing Office - Medical (sq.ft)
Existing Office - General (sq.ft.)
New Office - Medical (sq.ft.)
New Office - General (sq.ft.)
Total Office sq.ft. -(new and old)
Retail (sq.ft.)
91,964
Residential (units)
67,534
159,228
82,614
66,518
0
28,000
177,132
56,105
27,487
20,400
121,000
225,000
0 0 10,000
Restaurant (sq.~/seats) 0 2,500 10,000
200
Applications: U-2002-0~, EA-2002-05, EXC-2002-04 Hunter/Storm Associates
July g, 2002
Page 3
DISCUSSION
General Plan and Zoning
The General Plan designation is Commercial/Office/Residential and allows office floor
area ratio (FAR) of 0.33. The project site is currently zoned P (OP) - (Planned Office with
office, prototype research and incidental commerdal uses). The proposed project will
result in an overall office FAR of 0.33, which is consistent with the General Plan, The
project also includes 2,500 square feet of commercial use, which will be allocated from the
commercial pool for the Heart of the City (currently about 152,000 square feet is available).
Therefore, the Phase 1 proposal is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning.
HEART OF THE CITY SPECIFIC PLAN
The Heart of the City Specific Han was developed to guide future development along
Stevens Creek Boulevard. The Specific Plan provides development standards and
design guidelines for various land uses including: commercial, multi-unit residential
and mixed use residential and retail. The Phase 1 proposal is generally consistent with
the Heart of the City Specific Plan.
Height Exception Findings
The General Plan height limit for this site is 30-45 feet, but the Heart of the City height
limit is 36 feet. The proposed office building requires a height exception since the roof
peak is 45 feet above grade. Section 1.01.030 A 3 b of the Heart of the City Development
Standards allows for height exceptions, subject to City review, up to 45 feet in height for
sloping portions of roofs provided they are gable roofs not exceeding a 6:12 slope. Staff
supports the exception for height since the proposed building meets the Heart of the
City exception findings.
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN
The office and retail buildings are designed in a "neo-Mediterranean' architectural style
and are oriented toward the comer of Torte Avenue and Town Center Lane. The
buildings are separated because of a utility easement that runs between the buildings.
The office building is two stories high with an underground parking garage. It
incorporates a pitched tile roof supported by wood brackets and entries along Torre
Avenue and the plaza facing Town Center Lane. The building has a highly defined
limestone base extending about three-quarters the height of the first story. The
underground garage is mostly submerged and is screened with landscaped planters
along the Torre elevation. The first story has large arched windows and an arcade
along Torte Avenue. The second level has a simpler design consisting of smaller
recessed windows framed by pilasters. The facades are articulated with an entry tower
and arcade, building plane changes and inset windows. The materials proposed for the
U-2002-0~'?EA-2002-05,
Applications: EXC-2002-04 Hunter/S~r~ Associates
July 8, 2002
Page 4
building are of a high quality and consist of a limestone base, beige color stucco for the
main body of the building, inset wood windows in a dark brown, and terracotta color
concrete tile for the pitched roof.
The retail/cafe building is built in the same style and with the same materials as the office
building. However, it has "Tuscan Yellow" walls, dark green awnings, and additional
features including an octagonal comer entry feature, storefront windows, and trellises to
differential it from the office use. The building is open to street view along Torre Avenue
and Town Center Lane with large windows lining the indoor dining area and includes
outdoor dining on the plaza.
The plaza is raised 2'-6" above the sidewalk and will be scored concrete in a terracotta color
with beige divider bands and dark brown insets. The plaza is landscaped with planters
and trees. Lighting for the project consists of high-quality architectural light standards in a
dark green color and coordinated wall-mounted lights and bollards. Street furniture
including benches, outdoor dining furniture, planter pots and trash cans, is also designed
to coordinate with the buildings. The architecture, plaza, landscaping and street trees along
Torre and Rodriguez Avenues will help create an inviting and pedestrian-friendly
atmosphere. A material board will be available at the meeting.
The project was reviewed by Larry Cannon, the City's architectural consultant (see Exhibit
B), who was generally pleased with the project and site design but recommended an
alternate design for the entrance elevations. The design was modified by the applicant and
is part of the plan set. Staff recommends approval on the design.
TRAFFIC & CIRCULATION
Traffic Analysis
A traffic report was prepared by Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. in June 2002 (Exhibit A)
indicating conditions for Phase 1 and for proposed project build-out. The proposed
mixed-use project is expected to generate a total of 515 daily trips, with 50 AM peak
hour trips and 54 PM peak hour trips. Based on the estimated current volume of
Stevens Creek Boulevard (between 30,000-33,000 cars/day), staff does not consider 515
daily trips to be significant.
The traffic report analyzed the following intersections for impacts over background
conditions (already approved and pending projects):
· De Anza Boulevard/Stevens Creek Boulevard
· De Avaza Boulevard/Rodrigues Avenue
· De Anza Boulevard/McClellan Road
· De Anza Boulevard/Bollinger Road
· Stevens Creek Boulevard/Torte Avenue
· Stevens Creek BoulevardBlaney Avenue
Applications:
July 8, 2002
Page 5
U-2002-03;': £A-2002-05, EXC-2002-04 Hunter / StSi.~ Assodates
· Blaney Avenue/Bollinger Road
· Rodrigues Avenue/Torte Avenue
· Blaney Avenue/Rodrigues Avenue
· Torre Avenue/Pacifica Drive
The minimum acceptable operating level of service for an intersection in the City of
Cupertino is LOS D with two exceptions; LOS E+ for the Stevens Creek Boulevard/De
Anza Boulevard and De Anza Boulevard/Bollinger Road intersections. The analysis
indicates that the proposed Phase 1 project will not cause any change in LOS above the
Background Conditions. Therefore, the project will not cause a significant impact at any of
the City or CMP-monitored (Santa Clara County Congestion Management Program)
intersections under the City's Transportation Impact Analysis and/or the Santa Clara
County CMP Transportation Impact Analysis guidelines. Based on the analysis provided
in the traffic report, the project will not have significant traffic impacts.
Year 2010 Impacts
Year 2010 conditions were analyzed to determine the project's traffic impacts under
cumulative conditions. The existing traffic counts were increased by an annual growth
factor of 1.2% and pending projects within the City were included in this scenario. The
analysis indicated that the intersection at De Anza Boulevard and McClellan Road (PM
peak hour) would operate at LOS E during the PM peak hour. Staff is exploring a design to
simplify and enhance the intersection of De Anza Boulevard and Mcclellan Road adding a
second northbound left-turn lane (going west on Mcclellan Road) and restricting Pacifica
Drive to right-tums. The traffic analysis indicates that this design would improve the LOS
at the intersection of De Anza Boulevard and McClellan Road to LOS D during the PM
peak hour. The project at buildout is expected to contribute to about 1% of the total traffic
and Phase 1 traffic about 0.2%. The applicant will be required to contribute their
proportionate share of the cost to redesign the McClellan/De Anza signal to enable it to
function more efficiently, as described in the traffic report (page 42). The applicant's
proportionate share will equal the increment of new traffic added to the intersection
compared to the new traffic from the near tern build-out in the surrounding area.
Cut Through Traffic
The traffic analysis indicates the following patterns of cut-through traffic:
· Rodrigues Avenue - Project traffic will use Rodrigues Avenue to access De Anza
Boulevard or Blaney Avenue to and from Bollinger Road. Estimated trips on Rodrigues
Avenue include 10 PM peak hour trips (106 daily trips or about 3% of daily traffic) east'
of Torre Avenue.
· Pacifica Avenue - Project traffic may cut through Pacifica Avenue to get to and from De
Anza Boulevard or Blaney Avenue. The analysis assumed that the gate at Pacifica
would not be in operation. The traffic analysis estimated that there would be 4 PM peak
hour trips (38 daytime trips or less than 2% of daily traffic) on Pacifica Avenue east of
Torre Avenue.
· Silverado Avenue - No cut-through traffic is expected on Silverado Avenue.
Applications:
July 8, 2002
Page 6
U-2002-%~'£A-2002-05, EXC-2002-04 Hunter / s~rm Associates
The Environmental Review Committee identified Rodrigues Avenue and Pacifica Drive
as requiring mitigation measures for cut-through traffic. Staff believes the impacts on
Pacifica Drive are relatively low and are partially addressed by the applicant's
participation in potential improvements to the McClellan/De Anza traffic signal. If
implemented, the signal redesign will make it more difficult to use Pacifica as a through
route between McClellan Road and Blaney Avenue, thereby reducing the peak hour
traffic on Pacifica Drive. A condition of approval will therefore require the applicant to
provide neighborhood traffic mitigation on Rodrigues Avenue. This mitigation will
include traffic calming measures such as on-street parking (to off-set parking
deficiencies), traffic curb bulb-outs and/or other traffic mitigation measures, as deemed
appropriate, to offset the project traffic that will use the street (see Exhibit C for concept
plan).
Shared Parking
The new office and retail buildings will share parking with existing uses on the entire site,
which include professional office and medical office uses. The parking ordinance requires
786 spaces for the project site. The project proposes 752 spaces leaving a deficit of 34
spaces. The traffic analysis includes a parking utilization study for the site and parking
surveys for similar projects in the area and concludes that a maximum of 722 spaces would
be required for the site. Municipal Code Section 19.100.40F(2) states that the Planning
Commission can approve a shared parking plan that results in less parking than required
by code under the following conditions:
· The land use consists of a shopping center office or industrial development, which is owned or
managed by a single entity - The Town Center development is currently managed by a
single entity. Additionally, the uses will have to comply with the conditions of
approval for the entire project.
· The applicant has submitted a detailed parking study which demonstrates that the proposed use
is compatible with the proposed parking supply - The traffic analysis indicates that a
maximum of 722 spaces would be required for the entire site (including Phase 1). The
project provides 752 spaces and therefore exceeds the parking demand.
· The proposed shared parking plan may be approved in conjunction with a conditional use permit
application in a planned development zone or via an exception for a project which is not located
in a planned development zone - The project is in a planned development zone and will
comply with conditions of approval as part of this use permit.
Based on the above analysis, staff is comfortable approving the project with 752 on site
spaces. Staff recommends that a parking management plan be prepared and approved by
staff before issuance of building permits, as stated in the model resolution, in order to
verify that the allocation of the parking stalls is as efficient as possible.
On-Street Parking
The applicants propose to provide angled parking on Torre Avenue in the final Master
plan. Staff recommends that Phase 1 be approved with the inclusion of angled parking on
Applications:
July 8, 2002
Page 7
U-2002-03/£A-2002-05, EXC-2002-04 Hunter/Storm Associates
the west side of Torte Avenue along the project frontage and including the bulb-outs on
both sides of Town Center Lane (shown on sheet A-l). This will provide an additional 5
spaces along the street (providing additional mitigation for the parking deficiency on-site)
and help to create a pedestrian-oriented streetscape between the project and Civic Center.
The angled parking will require moving the sidewalk back by five feet on the west side of
Torre Avenue. Public Works has reviewed and approved the plan.
The Environmental Review Committee also recommended that if the master plan did not
proceed, the applicants must agree to provide the on-street spaces south of Town
Center Lane (as shown on sheet MP of the plan set). A condition of approval requires a
bond from the applicant for the construction of the parking spaces south of Town
Center Lane if construction on the master plan does not proceed within two years from
the date of the approval of Phase 1.
Temporary Parking Lot
The applicant proposes a temporary parking lot with temporary improvements. Staff
recommends that the temporary lot be approved for a limited time and required to meet
pem-tanent improvements if construction on the master plan does not proceed within two
years from the date of the approval of Phase 1. A condition of approval is included to
address this issue.
Civic Center Special Events
The applicant has agreed to allow public parking on the site during special events in the
Civic Center. A condition of approval is included to this effect.
Pedestrian Paths
The design of the site includes well-defined pedestrian areas and pathways around and
through the site within the scope of the current project. A pathway is provided from the
Rodrigues Avenue along the west side of the office building onto the landscaped plaza
which connects to the sidewalk along Torre Avenue. The plaza and pathways will be open
to the public at all times. A condition of approval requires the applicant to record
pedestrian easements to allow public access to the site.
Transportation Demand Management (TD1V0 Measures
Although the Phase 1 project is not expected to cause significant impacts to traffic and
circulation, the project will incorporate Transportation Demand Management (TDM)
measures to reduce the number of single-occupant vehicles and its overall parking
demand. These include: TDM manager and annual reporting process; on-site facilities
such as bike storage, preferential parking for carpools/vanpools and showers; a
guaranteed Ride Home program; in-house carpool matching service; and flextirne work
policy.
Applications: U-2002-0~ £A-2002-05, EXC-2002-04 I-Iunter/St~m Associates
July 8, 2002
Page 8
OTHER ISSUES
Tree Removal
1. Building Site - Twenty-four of the thirty-two trees on the site of the new buildings
are proposed for removal to accommodate the new underground parking garage
and building footprints. The two trees to be saved are heritage Coast Live Oaks. In
addition, six redwoods at the intersection of Rodrigues and TorTe Avenues and
along the Torre Avenue frontage will be relocated along Rodrigues Avenue (subject
to the arborist's evaluation). Nineteen of the proposed removals are Golden
Raintrees and five are Chinese Pistaches. The applicant is proposing to plant thirty-
six new trees as part of the new landscaping plan. Staff recommends that all the
proposed trees have a minimum planting size of 48" box size (except for the four
Japanese Maples on the parking garage deck which shall remain 24" box). A
condition is included in the model resolution to this effect. The conditions also
address relocation of the redwoods and special protection for heritage oaks during
construction. This .conforms to mitigation measures recommended by the
Environmental Review Committee.
2. Temporary Parking Lot - Six out of ten existing trees are proposed for removal to
create a parking lot in the area of Buildings 4&5, which are proposed to be
demolished. The four trees to be retained are heritage Coast Live Oaks. Five of the
proposed removals are Liquidambars and one is a Chinese Pistache. The temporary
parking lot does not provide landscaping and trees in compliance with the parking
code. A condition of approval will require that the parking lot be redesigned to
comply with City codes if construction of the master plan does not begin within two
years of approval of Phase 1. An additional condition will address special
protection for heritage oaks during construction.
3. Street Trees - The landscape plan for Master plan proposes to remove the
Liquidambar street trees and replace them with London Planes. Since the project
will include angle parking on Torre Avenue (west side) as part of Phase 1, four trees
along Torre Avenue and one along Rodrigues Avenue will be replaced with five
London Plane trees along Torre Avenue and two along Rodrigues Avenue. The
Public Works Department and City arborist have reviewed and approved the
location and type of the replacement street trees.
Signage
The applicant has not currently proposed any signage. All signage will require
consistency with the architecture, colors and materials for the Phase 1 buildings.
Additional sign review will be required and may be approved at staff level or by the
Design Review Committee if directed by the Planning Commission.
Applications:
July 8, 2002
Page 9
U-2002-03~'EA-2002-05, EXC-2002-04 Hunter / s~rm Associates
Trash Enclosures
The applicant is proposing two new trash enclosures to be located in the parking lot to
west of the proposed office building. These enclosures will be attractively designed and
screened by landscaping. The size and location has been reviewed and approved by
Public Works for adequate trash and recycling facilities.
Sanitary Sewer
Sanitary sewer service is available, but the Sanitary District has indicated that the
system is at capacity and that improvements consisting of 1800 linear feet of sewer will
be required along Wolfe Road (north side) between Stevens Creek Boulevard and Hwy
280. The applicants, like other users of the system, will be required to pay District fees
and obtain a permit for construction of the project. A condition requires that if
necessary improvements are required, they shall be completed prior to building
occupancy.
Storm Water Quality Management
The Regional Water Quality Control Board is requiring local agencies to reduce
impervious surface and incorporate storm water quality design techniques in their new
projects. The current project site is paved asphalt parking lot. The project (including
temporary parking lot) will increase landscaping area by 378 square feet, thereby
reducing impervious surface area. Therefore, there will be no negative impacts to the
storm drain system.
Environmental Review
The Environmental Review Committee recommended a Mitigated Negative Declaration
with the following mitigations:
1. Tra_ffic: The applicant shall contribute their proportionate share of the cost to
redesign the McClellan/De Anza signal to enable it to function more efficiently, as
described in the traffic report (page 42). The applicant's proportionate share will
equal the increment of new traffic added to the intersection compared to the new
traffic from the near term build-out in the surrounding area.
Secondly, the applicant will provide neighborhood traffic mitigation on Rodrigues
Avenue and Pacifica Drive. This mitigation will include traffic calming measures
such as on-street parking (to off-set parking deficiencies), traffic curb bulb-outs
and/or traffic speed humps or other traffic mitigation measures, as deemed
appropriate, to offset the project traffic that will use these two streets.
Parking: On-street parking spaces must be provided along Torre Avenue to
implement the planned streetscape and offset on-site parking deficiencies. The
timing of the installation of the spaces will be contingent on the City's Civic Plaza
Applications: U-2002-~'~i~ EA-2002-05, EXC-2002-04 Hunter/S~rm Associates
July 8, 2002
Page 10
and Library project. Over the long term, if the master plan does not proceed ahead,
they must agree to provide the on-street spaces south of Town Center Lane (labeled
on the drawing as Civic Park Drive). Town Center Lane must be aligned with the
future plaza across the street.
o
Trees: The applicant will prov. ide seventeen 48-inch box trees to compensate for the
removal of seventeen specimen trees and nineteen 24-inch box trees for a total of
thirty-six (36) new replacement trees.
All the above mitigations have been incorporated into the conditions of approval. As
discussed earlier, the larger sized trees have already been incorporated as part of the
project.
ENCLOSURES
Model Resolution for U-2002-03
Model Resolution for EXC-2002-04
Exhibit A: Traffic Report prepared by Fehr and Peers dated June 2002
Exhibit B: Architectural Consultant Review Letter dated March 29, 2002
Exhibit C: Concept plan for traffic calming on Rodrigues Avenue
Initial Study
Recommendation of the Environmental Review Committee
Plan set
Submitted by: Aarti Shrivastava, Senior Planner
Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Developme~,~
G: \ Planning \ PDREPORT\ pcUsereports \ U-2002-O3.doc
EXHIBIT A
FINAL REPORT ..
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT AHAI,YSIS
TOWN CENTER PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT
(Cupertino, California)
Prepared for:
H/S CTC Funding, Inc.
Prepared by:
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
June2002
FEHK & PEEKS
TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS
255 N. Market Street, Suite 200 San 3ose, CA 95110 (~08) 278-1700 F~x (~08) 278-1717
www. fehrandpeers.com C~
TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS
FOR TOWN CENTER PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT
(Cupertino, California)
Prepared for:
H/S CTC Funding, Inc.
Prepared by:
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
June 2002
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter Pace
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ i
1-INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1
2 - EXISTING AND EXPECTED TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM ............................
Existing Roadway Network .....................................................................................
Existing Transit Service ...........................................................................................
Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities ...............................................................
3 - EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................................................................ 11
Existing Traffc Volumes ...................................................................................... ! 1
Existing Intersection Levels of Service ................................................................. 11
4 - BACKGROUND CONDITIONS .............................................................................. 16
Background Traffic Estimates ............................................................................... 16
Background Intersection Levels of Service ........................................................... 16
PROJECT (PHASE 1) CONDITIONS ..................................................................... 21
Project Traffic Estimates ....................................................................................... 21
Project Intersection Levels of Service ................................................................... 26
Project Intersection Impacts ................................................................................... 26
Mitigation of Project Intersection Impacts ............................................................ 2~
Site Access ............................................................................................................. 28
Parking ................................................................................................................... 28
Transportation Demand Management Program ..................................................... 3 !
Neighborhood Traffic Issues .................................................................................. 31
6 - PROJECT BUILDOUT coNDmoNs ................................................................. 33
Project Buildout Traffic Estimates ........................................................................ 33
Project Buildout Intersection Levels of Service .................................................... 33
Project Buildout Intersection Impacts .................................................................... 34
Mitigation of Project Buildout Intersection Impacts ............................................. 34
Parking ................................................................................................................... 37
7- EXPECTED GROWTH CONDITIONS ............................................................... 38
Expected Growth Traffic Estimates ....................................................................... 38
Expected Growth Intersection Levels of S~rice ................................................... 38
8 - YEAR 2010 CoNDmONS .................................................................................... 41
Year 2010 Traffic Estimates .................................................................................. 41
Year 2010 Intersection Levels of Service .............................................................. 42
9 - CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................... 45
Intersection Impacts ............................................................................................... 45
Other Issues ............................................................................................................ 46
Technical Appendices
LIST OF TABLES
Table Pace
ES-la
ES-lb
1.
3a.
3b.
4.
Sa.
5b.'
6.
7a.
7b.
8.
9.
10.
lla.
lib.
12.
13a.
13b.
14.
15a.
15b.
Signalized Intersection Level of S.rvice Summary ................................................ iv
Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Summary ............................................ iv
Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions
Using Average Stopped Vehicular Delay .............................................................. 13
Level of Service Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections ....................................... 13
Existing Signalized Intersection Levels of Service ............................................... 14
Existing Unsignalized Intersection Levels of Service ........................................... 14
Approved Projects ................................................................................................. 17
Background Signalized Intersection Levels of Service ......................................... 20
Background Unsignalized Intersection Levels of Service ..................................... 20
Trip Generation Estimates ..................................................................................... 22
Background and Project (phase 1) Signalized Intersection Levels of Serdce ...... 27
Background and Project (Phase 1) Unsignalized Intersection Levels of Service..27
Parking Required vs Parking Demand ................................................................... 29
Parlcing Demand Rates from ITE and Surveys at Bay Area Office Buildings ....... 30
Buildout Trip Genmtion Estimates ...................................................................... 34
Background and Buildout Signalized Intersection Levels of Service .................... 36
Background and Buildout Unsignalized Intersection Levels of Service ...............36
Summary of City Parking Requirements ............................................................... 37
Expected Growth Signalized Intersection Levels of Service ................................. 40
Expected Growth Unsignalized Intersection Levels of Service ............................. 40
Pending Projects .................................................................................................... 41
Year 2010 Signalized Intersection Levels of Service ............................................ 44
Year 2010 Unsignalized Intersection Levels of Service ........................................ 44
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
Pa~e
2.
3.
4.
5.
Site Location ............................................................................................................ 3
Proposed Site Plan ................................................................................................... 4
Existing Lane Configurations .................................................................................. 7
Existing Transit Routes ................... ~... ..................................................................... 8
Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ............................................................. 10
8.
9.
10.
11.
12
13
14
Existing Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes .................................... . ................................ 12
Location of Approved and Pending Projects ......................................................... 1 g
Background Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes .............................................................. 19
Project Trip Distribution ........................................................................................ 23
Proj ¢¢t (Phase 1) Trip Assignment ........................................................................ 24
Project (Phase 1) Pc, ak-Hour Traffic Volumes ...................................................... 25
Project Buildout Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes ....................................................... 35
Expected Growth Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes ..................................................... 39
Year 2010 Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................................. 43
Cupertino Town Center Phaxe J TL4
June 2002
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report presents the results of the Transportation Impact Analysis (TI.A) conducted for the
proposed Phase 1 of the Town Center project in Cupertino, California. The purpose of the
analysis is to identify the likely transportation impacts of the proposed development on the
surrounding roadway system and to identify improvements to mitigate significant impacts. The
project will be built in two phases with Phase I cousisting of approximately 28,000 square feet
of office space and 2,500 square feet of restaurant space. Approximately 10,000 square feet of
existing office space would be removed as part of Phase 1. Buildout of the project site (Phase 2)
would include removing approximately 39,000 square feet of medical office space and 26,500
square feet ofoftice space and adding 130,000 square feet of office space, 15,000 square feet of
medical office space, 130 apartments, 10,000 square feet of retail space and a 10,000-square foot
restaurant. Five existing buildings totaling 83,600 square feet would remain on the project site.
Discussion ofbuildout of the project site is included for information purposes only. Detailed
traffic analysis for buildout conditions will be conducted in a separate traffic study.
The project site is located on the block bounded byDe Anza Boulevard to the west, Rodrigues
Avenue to the north, Torre Avenue to the east, and Pacifica Drive to the south. Phase I project
is located on the northeast comer of the project site at the intersection of Rodrigues Avenue and
Torre Avenue. Phase 1 of the project will have shared access with the existing medical office
buildings to driveways on De Anza Boulevard, Rodrigues Avenue, and Torre Avenue. Primary
access to the proposed project is provided via a driveway on Rodrigues Avenue and a driveway
on Torre Avenue.
A. Analysis Scenarios
The impacts of the proposed project were estimated following guidelines of the City of
Cupertino and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) which is the congestion
management agency for Santa Clara County. The operations often intersections were evaluated
using the TR.AFFIX software package, which is the adopted method for all agencies within the
County. The operations of the key intersections were evaluated during the morning (AM) and
evening (PM) peak hours for the following scenarios:
Scenario 1:
Existing Conditions. Existing volumes obtained from counts,
representing peak one-hour traffic conditions during the morning
and evening commute periods.
Scenario 2:
Background Conditions. Existing peak-hour volumes plus traffic
from approved but not yet constructed developments in the study
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Cupertino Town Center Phase 1 TI,4
June 2002
Scenario 3:
Project ('Phase 1) Conditions. Background peak-hour volumes
plus Phase 1 project-generated traffic.
Scenario 4:
Project BuiIdout Conditions. Background peak-hour volumes
plus Phase 1 and Phase 2 project-generated traffic. (informational
purposes only)
Scenario 5:
Expected Growth Conditions. Existing volumes increased by an
annual growth factor of 1.2 percent per year to the projected
opening date of Phase 2 (Fall 2007) plus approved trips plus
Phase 1 and Phase 2 project tra~c.
Scenario 6:
Year 2010 Conditions. Existing volumes increased by an annual
growth factor of 1.2 percent per year to the year 2010 plus Phase
1 and Phase 2 project traffic plus traffic from approved and
pending developments.
Issues regarding site access, parking, and neighborhood traffic issues were also addressed.
B. Project Traffic
The amount of traffic generated by the proposed development was e~mated by applying the
appropriate trip generation rates to the corresponding land use type and development size from
the institute of Transportation En~neers. Trips associated with the existing office building
removed as part of the project were subtracted fi'om the project site. The proposed Phase 1
project is estimated to generate a total of 515 net-new daily trips, 50 net-new AM peak-hour
trips, and 54 net-new PM peak-hour trips. At Buildout (after completion of Phase 2), the project
was estimated to generate a total of 3,253 net-new daily trips, 323 net-new AM peak-hour trip,
and 355 net-new PM peak-hour trips.
The trip distribution patterns for the project components were estimated based on existing travel
patterns in the vicinity of the site and the relative locations of complementary land uses. The
project-generated traffic was assigned to specific intersections and turning movements to
determine the potential impacts of the proposed project.
C. Intersection Levels of Service
Using the information supplied by the City of Cupertino (existing counts, approved projects, and
signal timings), data obtained in the field, and the proposed project uses, level of service (LOS)
calculations were conducted for Existing, Background, Proj.ect (Phase 1), Project Buildout and
Expected Growth Conditions. The City of Cupertino has completed the De Anza Boulevard &
Stevens Creek Arterial Management Project. That project optimized signal coordination on these
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Cupertino Town Center Phase 1 27.4
June 2002
streets to enhance corridor and intersection efficiency. The cycle lengths determined by the
arterial management project were obtained through the City of Cupertino traffic-engineering
department and used to calculate LOS at all of the key intersections. The results of the
intersection level of service calculations are presented in Tables ES-la and ES-lb.
The minimum acceptable operating level of service for an intersection in the City of Cupertino is
LOS D, with two exceptions. The city's General Plan states that the acceptable threshold the
Stevens Creek Boulevard/De gaza Boulevard and De Anza Boulevard/Bollinger Road
intersections is LOS E+ (with no more than 45 seconds weighted delay). The minimum
acceptable level for CMP-monitored intersections is LOS E. However, the City thresholds
govern in terms of identifying impacts.
D. Intersection Impacts
The City of Cupertino's Transportation Impact Analysis Guidelines and the Santa Clara County
Congestion Management Program TIA guidelines were used to assess project impacts.
Implementation of the proposed project would result in a significant impact if the addition of
project traffic causes:
1. The level of service at a key intersection operating at LOS D or better under
Background Conditions to deteriorate to LOS E or F, or
2. An increase in the critical movement delay at a key signalized intersection operating at
LOS E or F under Background Conditions by four (4) or more seconds and an
increase in the critical WC ratio by 0.01 or more.
The level of service at the Stevens Creek Boulevard/De Anza Boulevard or De Anza
Boulevard/Bollinger Road intersections to operate at LOS E or worse with more than
45 seconds of average vehicle weighted delay, or
4. Degradation of the level of service at a CMP-monitored intersection operating at LOS
E or better under Background Conditions to LOS F, or
An increase in the critical movement delay at a CWl?-monitored intersection operating
at LOS F under Background Conditions by four (4) or more seconds and an increase in
the critical V/C ratio by 0.01 or more.
According to these criteria, the project will not cause a significant impact at any of the City or
CMP-monitored intersections.
Fehr & Peers ~sociates, Inc.
Cupertino Town Center Pha~e
dune 2002
Table ES-la
Signalized Intersection Level of Service Summary
i l~xiSting I Bacl~ound i Pro~ect i Buildout
Intersection Peak i Delayi I Delay Delay i I Delay
Hour (sec)' LOS~ (sec)', LOS~, (sec)' I LOS: (sec)' LOS~
De AnzaBlvd./ AM I 23.4 C-I 25.4 i D+ i 25.4 i D+ 25.2 D+
Smv~nsCre~kBlvd.' PM! 27.6 D+I 29.6 ! D ! 29.7 ! D , 30.0 D
DcAnmBlv&/ AM t 14.5 B- 15.1 i C+ i 15.6 i C+ 16.5 C+
Rott~gucsAv~nue PMI 11.9 B 13.9 i B- i 14.0 I, B- , 14.7
De Anza Blvd./ AM 17_3 C 18.0 i C i 18.0 ! C 18.2 C
, I D+ 27.8 D+
McClellan Road PM 24.9 C- 27.6 iD+ i 27.6
DeAnzaBlvcU AM 19.8 C 20.3 i C i 20.5 i C 20.5 C
BolllnE~r Rd.' PM 15.8 C+ 15.8 } C+ i 15.8 ! C+ 15.7 C+
St~vensCreekBlvdd AM $.8 t B 9.2 i B I 9.2 i B 9.6
TorreAw. PM 8.5 . 13 8.9 ! B ! 9.0 i B 9.3 B
Stev~nsCreekBlvdd ] AM [ 17.2 [ C 17.4 ' C i 17.4 [ C 17.4 C
Blaney Ave./ AM 10.2 B 10.2 i B 10.2 i B 10.2 B
Bo!!ing~rRd. , PM 11.2 B 11.2 i B I 11.2,[ B 11.2 B
Not~: ~ Whol~ int~r~ion vmight~l av~-ag¢ StOlid ~hy ~ in s~e~md$ l~r w. hicle for signalized
a LOS calculalions l~formed using the 1985 Highwa~ Capac~ Manual methodology for sigmliz~d intor-~iom wi~h ~lju~d
Table ES-lb
Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Summary
I I Existing Back~ound i Pro~ect Bufldout
I Hour (sec) ' LOS~, (sec) LOS' (sec) iL OS3 (sec) LOS'
All-Wa), Stop Control~
I I,o [i
TorreAv¢. PM 10..-3 B 110.7 B 10.7 i B 11.5 B
Blan~y Ave./ ! AM 18.5 t2 18.8 12 19.1 i 12 22.1 12
Rodri~uesAve. i PM 16.4 C 17.9 12 18.2i 12 20.3 12
Two-Hay $to£ Control~
Pacifica D~. PM . · A 10.5 B 10.6 i B 10.6 B
Not~s: ~ DelayandLOSshown,.l~,,:..~entmmmllint~'~-'ctionforalNwaystopconlrolinl~ections
~ LOS calculations p~rformed using the 1997 H~Stway ~ Manua/mett-.odology
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Cupertino Town Center Phase I TLd
June 2002
E. Other Issues
Several other issues were evaluated in the TIA. These include:
· Project site access;
,, Parking; and
· Neighborhood traffic issues.
The project's primary access points are via a driveway on Rodrigues Avenue and a driveway on
Torre Avenue. The proposed project will have shared access with the existing office/medical
office buildings to driveways on De Anza Boulevard and other driveways on Rodrigues Avenue
and Torte Avenue. It is recommended that the Rodrigues Avenue driveway be a minimum of 24
feet wide.
Adequate on-site vehicle circulation would be provided on the project site. It is recommended
that with buildout of the project site, pedestrian pathways be provided from the southem part of
the Phase 1 development to the rest of the project site. Adequate bicycle access would be
provided to the project site.
At the end of Phase 1, the project site would have 732 parking spaces. Applying the City's
parking requirements for the entire site including Phase 1, the project site would need to provide
785 parking spaces. Based on existing parking occupancy surveys conducted for the site and for
other office and medical office buildings indicated that the proposed parking would be sufficient
to meet the expected parking demand. At the completion of Phase 2, the project site would
provide the City's required parking of 1,387 parking spaces.
The project should implement a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Program to reduce
the number of single-occupant vehicles and its overall parking demand.
The project would add traffic to the residential portion of Rodrigues Avenue, east of Torre
Avenue. This traffic would be less than 3 percent of the existing daily traffic on Rodrigues
Avenue. The gate on Pacifica Avenue is currently inoperable. The gate is typically closed
between 6:30am and 8:30am and 4:00pm and 6:30pm. If the gate were to remain inoperable,
some of the project traffic may use Pacifica Avenue to access the project site. The project would
add approximately 1.5 percent of the existing daily traffic to Pacifica Avenue if the gate is not
used.
F. Year 2010 Impacts
Year 2010 Conditions were analyzed to determine the project's traffic impacts under cumulative
conditions. The existing traffic counts were increased by an annual growth factor of 1.2 percent
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Cupertino Town Center Please
June 2002
and p~ding projects within the City were included in this scenario. Based on the City' s criteria,
the following two key intersections would operate at unacceptable levels:
· De Anza Boulevard and McClellan Road (PM peak hour)
· Blaney Avenue and R.odrigues Avenue (AM peak hour)
The City's planned improvements to add a northbound left-turn lane at thc intersection of De
Anza Boulevard and McClellan Road .and restrict Pacifica Drive to right-turns only would
improve the LOS to D. The 2010 volumes at the intersection of Blaney Avenue and l~odrigues
Avenue would meet the Caltrans peak hour signal warrant. The City will determi,,e whether a
traffic signal is appropriate for this location. Implementation ofa TDM program would reduce
the project's traffic and miv, irnlze its cumulative impact to these intersections.
Fehr & Peers Associate~, Inc.
Cupertino Town Center Phase 1 TI.4
June 2002
1. INTRODUCTION
This report presents the results of the Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) conducted for Phase
1 of the proposed Cupertino Town Center project. The project site is located on the block
bounded by De Anza Boulevard to the west, Rodrigues Avenue to the north, Torte Avenue to the
east, and Pacifica Drive to the south and is currently occupied by office and medical office
buildings. Phase 1 consists of 28,000 square feet of office space and 2,500 square feet of
restaurant space. Two existing buildings with 10,000 square feet of office space would be
removed as part of the project. The Phase 1 building would be located at the northeast comer of
the project site. The site location and surrounding roadway network are presented on Figure 1.
The proposed project site plan is shown on Figure 2.
Buildout of the project site (Phase 2) would include removing approximately 39,000 square feet
of medical office space and 26,500 square feet of office space and adding 130,000 square feet of
office space, 15,000 square feet of medical office space, 130 apartments, 10,000 square feet of
retail space and a 10,000-square foot restaurant. Five existing buildings totaling 83,600 square
feet would remain on the project site. Discussion ofbuildout of the project site is included for
information purposes. Detailed traffic analysis for buildout conditions will be conducted in a
separate traffic study.
The purpose of the analysis is to identify the potential impacts of the proposed development
project on the transportation system in the vicinity of the site. The impacts of the proposed
project were evaluated following the guidelines of the City of Cupertino and the Santa Clara
Valley Transportation Authority (VTA), which is the congestion management agency of Santa
Clara County. The operations of key intersections were evaluated with level of service
calculations. The following ten intersections were aualyzed for this project:
· De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard
· De Anza Boulevard and Rodrigues Avenue
· De An~.a Boulevard and McClellan Road
· De An?a Boulevard and Bolliuger Road
· Stevens Creek Boulevard and Torte Avenue
· Stevens Creek Boulevard and Blaney Avenue
· Blaney Avenue and Bollinger Road
· Rodrigues Avenue and Tone Avenue
· Blaney Avenue and Rodrigues Avenue
· Pacifiea Drive and Torte Avenue
The operations of the key intersections were evaluated during the morning (AM) and evening
(PM) peak hours for the following scenarios:
Scenario 1:
Existing Conditions. Existing volumes obtained fi.om counts,
representing peak one-hour traffic conditions during the morning
and evening commute periods.
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Page l
Cupertino Town Center Phase I 17,4
June 2002
Scenario 2:
Background Conditions. Exis6ng peak-hour volumes plus ~affic
from approved but not yet constructed developments in the study
Scenario 3:
Project (Phase 1) Conditions. Background peak-hour volumes
plus Phase 1 project-generated traffic.
Scenario 4:
Project Buildout Conditions. Background peak-hour volumes
plus Phase 1 and Phase 2 project-generated traffic. (informational
purposes only) ·
Scenario 5:
Expected Growth Conditions. Existing volumes increased by an
annual growth factor of 1.2 percent per year to the projected
opening date of Phase 2 (Fall 2007) plus approved trips plus
Phase 1 and Phase 2 project traffic.
Scenario 6:
Year 2010 Conditions. Existing volumes increased by an annual
growth factor of 1.2 percent per year to the year 2010 plus Phase
1 and Phase 2 project traffic plus traffic from approved and
p~nding developments.
Several other issues including site access, parking, and neighborhood traffic issues were
evaluated in the TIA.
The remainder of this report is divided into eight chapters. The existing and expected
transportation system serving the project site, including the roadway facilities, bicycle and
pedestrian facilities, and transit service, is described in Chapter 2. The existing operating
conditions of the key intersections are presented in Chapter 3. Chapter 4 describes the approved
developments in the area and traffic operations for Background Conditions. Chapter 5 describes
the methodology used to estimate the project traffic and its impacts on the ~xausportation system.
In addition, site access, parking and neighborhood traffic are addressed in this chapter. Project
Buildout Conditions are presented in Chapter 6. ExPected Growth Conditions are presented in
Chapter 7. Chapter 8 presents the results of the analysis of Year 2010 Conditions. The
conclusions of this transportation impact analysis are presented in Chapter 9.
Fehr & Peers Associate. s, Inc.
Page 2
Y
Cr~k Blvd.
Not to Scale
Cupertino Town Center
SITE LOCATION
June 2002
458-11-01
FIGURE 1
Cupertino Town Center
PROPOSED SITE PLAN
Juoe 20O2
458-12-01
FIGURE 2
Cupertino Town Center Phase 1 TI,4
June 2002
2~ EXISTING AND EXPECTED TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
This chapter provides a description of the existing transportation system in the vicinity of the
project site and expected improvements or modifications. The transportation system includes
roadway facihties, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and transit service. Roadway system
operations are presented in Chapter 3: Existing Conditions.
Existing Roadway Network
Interstate 280 (I-280) and State Route (SR) 85 provide regional access to the project site. Stevens
Creek Boulevard and De Anza Boulevard provide local access to the project site. Internal access
roads provide access to the facilities of the Cupertino Town Center pmject. Descriptions of these
roadways are presented below:
1-280 is an eight-lane freeway (three mixed-flow lanes and one high-occupancy vehicle (HOV)
lane in each direction) located north of the project site. 1-280 extends northward to San Francisco
and southward to U.S. 101 in San Jose. Regional access between the site and 1-280 is provided
via the De Anza Boulevard interchange. Ramp metering is utilized on both northbound and
southbound on-ramps during peak periods.
SR 85 is a six-lane north-south freeway located to the south and west of the site. This freeway
includes two mixed-flow lanes and one HOV lane in each direction and extends northward to
U.S. 101 in Mountain View and southward to U.S. 101 in San Jose. Access to SR 85 is provided
via interchanges at Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road (De Anza Boulevard) south of the site and at
Stevens Creek Boulevard west of the site.
Stevens Creek Boulevard is a six-lane, east-west arterial roadway that extends from the western
boundary of the City of Cup~o to 1-880 in San Jose. East ofi-880, this roadwaybecomes San
Carlos Street and includes four travel lanes. This facility serves a major commercial corridor in
the South Bay Area.
De Anza Boulevard is a six- to eight-lane divided arterial roadway located west of the project site
that extends from Prospect Road to Homestead Road. De Anza Boulevard carries an average of
37,000 vehicles per day between McClellan Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard. South of
Prospect Road, this street is known as Saratoga-Sunnyvale Road, and north of Homestead Road,
this roadway is known as Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road.
The City of Cupertino has completed the De Anza Boulevard and stevens Creek Boulevard
Arterial Management Project. The project optimizes signal coordination on these streets to
enhance corridor and intersection efficiency. The calculations contained in this report use the
new cycle lengths provided by City of Cupertino staffthat are used in the Arterial Management
project.
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Page 5
Cupertino Town Center Phase i
June 2002
Ten (10) intersections were selected for analysis in this study based on traffic projections,
proximity of the intersections and the VTA guideline of 10 project trips per lane. Existing
intersection lane configurations used in the LOS analysis are presented on Figure 3.
B. Existing Transit Service
Bus transit service in Santa Clara County is operated by the Santa Clara Valley Transportation
Authority (VTA). Commuter rail service (CalTrain) is provided from San Francisco to Gilroyby
the Joint Powers Board. The existing transit facilities in the vicinity of the site are shown on
Figure 4. Rail service and the individual bus routes axe described below:
Route 23 is a local bus route that provides service between Downtown San Jose and the San
Antonio Shopping Center via Stevens Creek Boulevard near the site. The hours of operation are
from 5:00 am to 12:30 am with 15- to 60-minute headways on weekdays. On weekends, this
route operates on 15- to 60-minute headways between 6:00 am and 12:00 am.
Route 25 is a local bus route that provides service between East San Jose and De .Anza College.
Weekday hours of operation are from 5:00 am to 12:00 am with 10- to 60-minute headways.
Weekend operations are provided on 15- to 60-minute headways between 6:00 am and 11:30 pm.
This route operates on De Anza Boulevard south of the sit and includes a terminus on Alves
Drive west of Bandley Drive.
Route 54 is a local bus route between West Valley College and Suunyvale/I_~ckheed Martin. The
hours of operation are from 5:30 am to 10:00 pm with 15- to 60-minute headways. Weekend
operations are provided on 60-minute headways between 8:00 am and 7:30 pm. This route
operates on De .~7~. Boulevard south of the site.
Route 55 is a local bus route between Great America and De .Anza College. The hours of
operation are 5:30 am to 10:30 pm on weekdays with 15- to 60-minute headways. This route
operates on 30- to 60-minute headways between 8:00 am and 9:30 pm on Saturdays and
Sundays. Route 55 operates on De Anza Boulevard west of the project site.
CalTrain provides frequent train service between San Jose and San Francisco seven days a week.
During commute hours, CalTrain provides extended service to Morgan Hill and Gilroy. The
Sunnyvale Station is the closest station to the project site. Bus Route 55 provides the most direct
connection between the site and the station.
Fehr & Peers Associatez, Inc.
Page 6
Key:
;~ Traffic Signal Control
· ,o, Stop Controlled
vms |
June 2002
458-1301
Cupertino Town Center
INTERSECTION LANE CONFIGURATIONS
FIGURE 3
Home~t~l Rd.
, Ave.
L~zneo Dr.
Rd.
Vallco Pkwy
:'aclf~ca Dr.
Project Site
Key:
~ Bus Route
N
Not to
Cupertino To~n Center
EXISTING TRANSIT ROUTES
June 2002
458-1401
FIGURE 4
.Cupertino Town Center Phase 1
June 2002
C. Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities
Bicycle facilities are comprised of bike paths (Class I), bike lanes (Class 11'), and bike routes
(Class 1]I). Bike paths are paved pathways for use by bicycles that are completely separated from
roadways. Bike lanes are lanes on roadways designated for bicycle use by special lane markings,
pavement legends, and signage. Bike routes are designated with signs only and require bicyclists
to share the traveled way with motorists. In the vicinity of the site, bike lanes are delineated on
Stevens Creek Boulevard, De Auza Boulevard, Stelling Koad, and Blaney Avenue, while bike
routes are designated on Kodrigues Avenue, Lazaneo Drive, and Bandley Drive. Existing bicycle
facilities are shown on Figure 5.
Pedestrian facilities are comprised of sidewalks and pedestrian signals at intersections. Near the
site, sidewalks are located along Stevens Creek Boulevard, De Auza Boulevard, Rodrigues
Avenue, Tone Avenue and Pacifica Drive. Signalized crossings are provided on De Anza
Boulevard at Rodrignes Avenue and at McClellan Road/Pacifica Drive.
Fehr & Peers Associate~, Inc.
Page 9
" I.~iln,~o,i~
m ~ ~ns C~
I ~ ,
~ Pa~ Dn
M~l~n Rd. / ~ ~
Key:
mm Bike Lanes
! a ! I Bike Routes N
Not to Scale
/hm~me~ C~
Cupertino Town Center
EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES
June 2002
,se.~o~ FIGURE 5
Cupertino Town Center Phase ! TIA
June 2002
CHAPTER 3 - EXISTING CONDITIONS
Operations of the existing transportation system are documented in this chapter. Changes in
operations resulting from traffic added by approved developments are presented in Chapter 4.
A. Existing Traffic Volumes
Intersection operations were evaluated for both morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak traffic
conditions. Traffic counts were obtained from available count data from the City of Cupertino.
These counts were conducted in January and October 2000. New counts were not conducted
since traffic volumes have decreased with the economy slowdown. Using the older counts with
higher volumes yields more conservative results. Figure 6 presents the existing AM and PM
peak-hour turning movement volumes for all of the key intersections.
B. Existing Intersection Levels of Service
The operations of the key intersections were evaluated using Level of Service (LOS)
calculations. Level of Service is a qualitative description of an intersection's operation, ranging
from LOS A, or free-flow conditions, to LOS F, or oversaturated conditions.
The level of service methodology, for signalized intersections, approved by the City of
Cupertino, evaluates a signalized intersection's operation based on the average stopped vehicular
delay as described in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (Special Report 209, Transportation
Research Board) with adjustments to the saturation flow rates. The average delay for signalized
intersections was calculated using the TRAFFIX analysis sofhvare and is correlated to a LOS
designation as shown in Table 1. The level of service standard (i.e., minimum acceptable
operations) for the key intersections is LOS D. The same operations methodology is used by the
Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) to analyze traffic impacts for Congestion Management
Program (CMP) facilities. The level of service standard for CMP-designated intersections is LOS
E. However, the City's thresholds are used to identify intersection impacts.
The unsignalized intersections were analyzed using the 1997Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)
methodology. The ranges of delay for each LOS at unsignalized intersections are presented in
Table 2.
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Page 11
Key:
00(00) -- AM (PM)
d.-. 1074 (1tg2)
~ A'- 103 (93)
',4-- 177 (104)
88 (176)-,~.
~'F.[
d-.e23 (e6o)
,/,1, % ·
e3 (31)'-'~
~, ;-.d--03(2'J')
~6 (58)--~
June 2002
458-16.01
E,~ ~'~-.4, (10~)
~,- 131 (22o)
37 (~ ~
.4 (1~3)-~'
583 H209)-~
20 (1t8)~
37 (82)
1026 (1182)
~B4 (3O3)
Cupertino Town Center
EXISTING PEAK- HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
FIGURE 6
Cupertino Town Center Phase I TIA
dune 2002
Table 1
Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions
Usin~ Average Stopped Vehicular Delay
Average Stopped Delay
Level of Per Vehicle
Service Description, (Seconds)
A ~ Operations with very 10w dehy occuning with favorablei <5.0
progression and/or short cycle len~hs.
B+ ~ 5.1 to 7.0
B Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or [ 7.1 to 13.0
B- short cycle lengths, i 13.1 to 15.0
C+ Operations with average dehys resulting from fair progression i 15.1 to 17.0
C and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle fa/lures begin to } 17.1 to 23.0
C- appear. ! 23.1 to 25.0
D+ Operations with l°ng~r delays due to a combination o~uafavorable i 25.1 to 28.0
D progxession, long cycle l~ngths, a~l highV/C ratios. Many vehicles ! 28.1 to 37.0
D- stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. ! 37.1 to 40.0
E+ Operations with high delay values indicating poor progression, long i 40.1 to 44.0
E cycle lengths, and high VIC ratios. Individual cycle faihxes are [ 44.1 to 56.0
E- i frequent occurrences, i 56.1 to 60.0
[' Operati°ns with dehys unacceptable to most drivers 0eeurring due
F > 60.0
to over-satm'ation, poor progression, or very lon$ cycle len~hs.
Source: X~rA's CM? Transportation lmpa~t Ana/ys/s C_nddel/nes, May 7, 1998, and Tran~n~fion Rezezrch Board, Highway
CapaciO~Manual, Special R~rt 209, 1985.
Table 2
Unsignalized Intersection Level Of Service. De£mitions Using
Average Control Delay
Level of Average Control Delay
Service Description . Per Vehicle (Seconds)
A Little or no delays. _< 10.0
B [ Short traffic dehys. 10.1 to 15.0
Ct Average traffic delays. 15.1 to 25.0
D Long traffic delays. 25.1 to 35.0
E Vexy l~g traffic delays t 35.1 to 50.0
F [ Extreme traffic delays with intersection capacity exceeded,t > 50.0
Source: Transpon~on Research Board Highm~y Capacity Manual, Xpecid Report 209, 1997.
To evaluate current operations of the key interseefiom, existing volumes, existing lane
eon.figurations, and signal phasings and timings were used as inputs to the LOS calculation
methods. The results are presented in Table 3a and 3b and the LOS calculation sheets axe
presented in Appendix A.
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Page 13
Cup~'tino Town Center Phase 1 TIA
June 2002
Table 3a
Existing Signalized Intersection Levels of Service
~ Peak Count Delay
Intersection i! Hour Date (sec)~ ; LOS2
i AM 10/00 23.4 i C-
De Anza Blvd. / Stevens Creek Blvd? l
i PM 10/00 27.6 ! D+
De Anza Blv& / Rodrigues Avenue i AM 1/00 14.5 i B-
} PM 1/00 11.9 ! B
~, C
i AM 1/00 173
De Anza Blvd. / McClellan Road i PM 1/00 24.9 i C-
De A.nza Blvd. / Bollinger Rd.3 i AM 10/00 19.8 ', C
i PM 10/00 15.8 C+
Stevens Creek Blvd. / Torre Ave. i AM 10/00 8.8 i B
t PM 10/00 8.5 ~ B
Stevens Creek Blvd. / Blaney Ave. i AM 10/00 17.2 ~ C
i PM 10/00 19.7 C
Blaney Ave. / Bolling~r Rd. i AM 1/00 10.2 i B
{ PM 1/00 11.2 i B
No~s: ~ Whole intersection weighted averagc stopped delay ~xp~ssed in ~conds Ixn' v~hicle
2 LOS calculations performed using th~ 1985 H/ghway Capaci0~ Maraud methodology with adjus~ ~afion flow rates.
Table 3b
Existing Unsignalized Intersection Levels of Service
i i Worst-Case Movement
Peak i Count ] Delay
Intersection Hour [ Date I (sec} ! LOS~
~II Way Stop Control~
Rodrigues Ave. / Torre Ave. i AM ! 10/00 i 10.2 i B
PM 10/00 ! 10.3
Blaney Ave. / Rodrigues Ave. t AM i 10/00 i 18.5 i C
PM I 10/00,i 16.4 ,i C
Two-Way Stop Controlz
SB Torte Ave. / Paeifiea Dr.~[ AMPM it 10/0010/00 i[ 10.49.9 i~ AB
Notes: ~ Delay and LOS shown represent overall mteraection for ali-way stop consol inter~ians
2 Delay and LOS shown iev,~ent worst-case movement for two-way stop controlled inlg~eefions.
' Los ~o~ ~ro~ ~ ~ 1~ n~n~ c~ u~a
Under existing peak-hour conditions, all of the study intersections operate at LOS C or better
during both peak hours. According to Policy 4-2: Traffic Capacity and Land Use Limitations in
the City of Cupertino GeneralPlan, LOS D is the minimum acceptable operating level for all of
the key. Based on City of Cupertino criteria, all of the key intersections currently operate at
acceptable levels.
Fehr & Peers ~.ssociate~, Inc.
Page 14
- !
Cupertino Town Center Phase 1 TIA
dune 2002
According to VTA guidelines, the minimum acceptable operating level at the two ClV[P
intersections is LOS E. since all study locations are operating at LOS D or better, the CMP study
locations operate at an acceptable level.
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Page 15
Cupertino Town Center Phase 1
June 2002
CHAPTER 4 - BACKGROUND CONDITIONS
This chapter discusses the operations of the intersections under Background Conditions.
Background Conditions are defined as conditions prior to completion of the proposed
development. Traffic volumes for Background Conditions comprise existing volumes fi:om
counts plus Waffic generated by approved developments in the area. This chapter describes the
procedure used to determine the background traffic volumes and the results of the level of
service analysis for Background Conditions.
A. Background Traffic Estimates
The traffic volumes for Background Conditions were estimated by adding estimates of traffic
generated by approved but not yet constructed projects in the vicinity of the site to existing
volumes. A list of approved, but not yet constructed projects was obtained from city staff. Table
4 summarizes these developments and the corresponding trip generation estimates for each. The
locations of these projects are shown on Figure 7. The assignment of approved trips to each
intersection is provided on worksheets included in Appendix B. The resulting background tra~c
volumes are presented on Figure 8.
B. Background Intersection Levels of Service
Tables 5a and 5b presents the LOS calculation results for the study intersections under
Background Conditions. These calculations assume no changes to the existing intersection lane
configurations and include background tra~c volumes. The LOS calculation sheets are
contained in Appendix A.
Fehr & Peers ~sociat~, Inc.
Page 16
Cupertino Town Center Phase J TL4
June 2002
Table 4
Approved Developments
~ [ I AM Peak i PM Peak
Hou~ i Hour
Project Name Location Description Trips i Trips
I Torte Avenue and 32,000 s.L addition 37 i 200
A. City Lforary [ Pacifica Drive
B. Oak Valley Foothill Blvd. n/o
Stevens Creek Blvd. 178 homes 148 { 202
Oaks Center, Stevens
C. Anclronico's Market Creek Blvd. and Mary 32,160 s.f. supermarket 49 i 77
Avenue
D. Hewlett-Packard Wolfe Road and 293,780 s.f. office 442 ! 414
Cupertino Campus Pruneridge Avenue
205 du apartment
B/F. City Center andStevensDeAnzacreekBlvd.Blvd' 7,000 s.f. retail 218 !i 308
· 224-room hotel
Stevens Creek Blvd.
G. Adobe Inn between Torte Ave. 77-room hotel 43 I 47
* and Blaney Ave.
H. Cuperlmo I Stevens Creek Blvd. 24 du townhonse 22
Connnuaity ServicesI and Vista Drive 6,089 s.f. office I~ 23
I. P.S. Mulligan I Wolfe Road and 104,900 s.f. office 194
Praneridge Avenue ! 197
J
~I. Market Place Stevens Creek and 10,400 s.f. office
31 i 163
Expansion I Portal Drive 27,800 a.f. retail
DeAnza Blvd and
K. Chicago Pizza Mariani Drive 8,350 s.f. restaurant 0 38
Total Trips I 1,184 i 1,631
Source: City of Cupertino D~panm~t of Planning (March 2002).
Fehr & Peer~ A~sociates, Inc.
Page 17
Creek Blvd.
Approved Project
Pending Project
Not to Scale
Cupertino Town Center
~,,~.,,,..,,c,,,~,.,. LOCATIONS OF APPROVED AND PENDING PROJECTS
-'~' == FIGURE 7
4~8-17-01
Key:
00(00) = AM (PM)
~ ~ '~.-..61 (37)
~ 11'14 0357)
~ ,~'-~8 (1~6)
)~ s.,,.-, c,w I
772 (~e~)-~ ~ 3;
e) ~ '~"--60 (41)
,,(-)--,-
16 (9)'-'~
~ 62~ (ese)
~ ~ X..,,~ ('m)
~. ~ (27)
1~
~ (M)--~
ll
~ ~ '~r"""42(00)
~Nhl d'--" 1068 (1337)
· - o, ~,. ~---ee (311)
~8~ (1~77)-''~
24 (122)"~ ~- ~.. m
Cupertino Town Center
BACKGROUND PEAK- HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
June 2O02
458-18-01
FIGURE 8
Cupertino Town Center Phase I TL~
June 2002
Table Sa
Background Signalized Intersection Levels of Service
Peak Delay
· LOS2
Interse¢~on Hour {sec)x
Dc Anza BlvdY Stevens Creek Blvcl? { AM 25.4 D+
[ PM 29.6 D
! AM 15.1 C+
De Anza Blvd. / P, odfigues Avenue
I PM 13;9 B-
Dc Anza Blvd. / McClellan Road ! AM 18.0 C
i PM 27.6
De Anza Blvd./Bollinger Kd.~ i AM [ 20.3 C
i PM[ 15.8 C+
Stevens Creek Blvd. / Torre Ave. i AM 9.2 B
i PM 8.9 B
Stevens Creek Blvd. / Blaney Ave. i AM 17.4 C
~ PM 20.5 C
Blaney Ave. / Bollinger Rd. i AM 10.2 B
* PM 11.2 B
Noles: ~ Whole in~-rsecfion weiglned average siopped delay exprc~ed in seconds per vehicle
2 LOS calculations p~rformed using the 1985 Hjglmay Ctrpacay Manual m~thodology with adjusted saturation flow rat~.
Intersection
~4ll Way Stop Control~
Table 5b
Background Intersection Levels of Service
Peak
.Hour
Delay ~
(sec)' ,I LOS2
Rodrigues Ave. / Torre Ave.
Blaucy Ave. / Rodrigucs Ave.
PM
PM
10.3
10.7
18.8
17.9
B
B
C
C
Two-Way Stop Control
I 10.5 B
SB Torte Ave. / Pacifica Dr. AM )
t 10.5 B
Notes: ~ Delay and LOS shown rcpresont overall intersection far algw~y ~op conl~ol interactions
The results of the operations analysis indicate that all of the intersections would continue to
operate at acceptable levels with the addition of Waffle l~om approved developments. Under
Background Conditions, all of the CMP-monitored intersections will continue to operate at an
acceptable level according to VTA guidelines. There is no substantial change in LOS caused by
the addition of background traffic at any of the key intersections.
Fehr & Peers A~sociates, Inc.
Page 20
Cupertino Town Center Phase 1
June 2002
CHAPTER 5 - PROJECT (PHASE 1) CONDITIONS
The impacts of the proposed development on the surrounding roadway system are discussed in
this chapter. First, the methodology used to estimate the amount of traffic generated by the
project is described. Then, the distribution of project-generated traffic to the roadway system is
discussed. The operations of the intersections were analyzed under Project Conditions
(background volumes plus traffic generated by Phase I of the projec0 with level of service
calculations. The impacts of the project are identified by comparing the results of the level of
service calculations for Project Conditions to the results for Background Conditions. Site access
and parking are also addressed in this chapter.
Project Traffic Estimates
The amount of traffic associated with a project is estimated using a three-step process: (1) trip
generation, (2) trip distribution, and (3) trip assignment. In the first step, the amount of traffic
entering and exiting the site is estimated on both a daily and a peak-hour basis. In the second
step, the directions the trips use to approach and depart the site are estimated. The trips are
assigned to specific street segments and intersection turning movements in the third step. The
results of this analysis are described in the following sections.
1. Trip Generation
The proposed uses for the Phase 1 project include 28,000 square feet of office space and 2,500
square feet of restaurant space. Two existing buildings with approximately 10,000 squ_~re feet of
office space would be demolished as part of Phase 1.
The amount of tra~c generated by the existing office space and by the office aud. restaurant
space of the proposed project was estimated by applying appropriate trip generation rates to the
corresponding land use type and development size. Trip rates were obtained fi:om Trip
Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers, Sixth Edition).
The trip generation rates and corresponding inbound/outbound splits were applied to the existing
use and the proposed project to estimate net-added project-generated traffic. Reductions for
internalization between the office and restaurant uses were applied per VTA guidelines. The trip
generation estimates for the proposed project are presented in Table 6. The trips associated with
the existing office buildings that would be removed were subtracted from the totals to determine
the number of net new Wips that the project would generate. Phase 1, as proposed, is estimated to
generate a total of 515 net-new daily trips, 50 net-new AM peak-hour trips (36 in/14 out), and 54
net-new PM peak-hour trips (21 ia/33 out).
Fehr & Peers &ssociat~, Inc.
Page 21
Cupertino Town Center Phase 1 TI~
June 2002
Table 6
Trip Generation EStimates
Land Use
O~¢e
6~emoved)
O~ce
Size
10,000 s.f.
28,000 s.f.
Trip l~tes~
AM PM
Daily Peak Peak
11.01 1.56 1.49
11.01 1.56 1.49
Daily
(11o)
308
Number of Trips
AM Peak Hour
In Out Total
(14) (2) (16)
38 5 44
PM Peak Hour
In Out Total
(2) (12) (14)
7 35 42
Restaurant 2,500 s.f. 130.34 9.27 10.86 326 12 11 23 16 11 27
~~~o~ (9) (1) (0) (1) (0) (1)
Net New Project Trips 515 36 14 50
~Trip tale is p~r 1000 s.f.
Trip rates from Trip Oen~ration ~ of Tra~pomfion Engineers, Sixth Edition). Trips mtuctions baaed on VTA
guid¢linea.
Source:
21 33 54
2. Trip Distribution
The trip distribution patterns for the office and restaurant components of the project were
estimated baaed on existing travel patterns in the vicinity of the site and the relative locations of
complementary land uses in the area. The major travel directions for office and restaurant
project-generated traffic to approach and depart the project site are illustrated on Figure 9.
3. Trip Assignment
The trips generated by the office and restaurant components of the proposed development were
assigned to the roadway system based on the corresponding directions of approach and departure
shown on Figure 9. Figure 10 presents the peak-hour project trip assignments by turning
movement at the key intersections. The project trips were added to the traffic volumes for
Background Conditions to achieve turning movement volumes for Project Conditions, as shown
on Figure 11.
Fehr & Peer~ A~sociatez, Inc.
Page 22
1% 14% 1%16%
4% 10%
I~ I
14% 120% I
I I
~ intel~
I I
Project Site
Key: N
30% / lO% = Office / Restaurant
Cupertino 'rown Center
PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION
-,~, 2oo2 FIGURE 9
458-19-01
Key:
00(00) = AM (PM)
~'-4(3)
ii
2 (3)"'X
_ ~ %-2(2)
~I. ~2 (2)
1 (2).-e,.
1 (1)J
1 (o)-~,,-
~ i padrcaI
6 (2)-d'
Cupertino Tow~ Center
· -.PROJECT (Phase 1) TRIP ASSIGNMENT
FIGURE 10
Key:
00(00) = AM (PM)
I I stovom
470 (INT)'"+'l ~'~'
1114 (1357)
~-122 (117)
s~n~ C~kl
-/7 (78)..~' ~...~
,I-- 82 (113)
1~-49 (178)
180 (474)"~ ~,__~-~
(M
B ~ %-45 (19)
· ~--g3 (27)
"Pr.~ I
115 (161)-..~
36
1~~~. J'"~,.-42 (gO)
='~=-" I~1~- 1o72 (1~)
Cupertino Town Center
PROJECT (Phase 1) PEAK- HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
June 2OO2
458-21-01
FIGURE 11
Cupertino Town Center 'Phase ! IL4
June 2002
B. Project Intersection Levels of Service
Intersection level of service calculations were conducted to evaluate the operating conditions of
the intersections with project trail% to identify potential impacts to the local roadway system.
The results of the intersection level of service calculations for Background and Project
Conditions are summarized in Tables 7a and 7b. The changes in critical movement delay and
critical volume-to-capacity ratio for these intersections due to the addition of proj eot traffic are
also presented in Table 7. The intersection LOS calculation sheets and comparison reports (for
critical movement delay) are included in Appendix 3,.
All of the key intersections will continue to operate at LOS D or better during both peak hours
with the addition of traffic f~om the proposed project. All of the study intersections operate
acceptably under Project Conditions according to the City guidelines.
C. Project Intersection Impacts
The results of the LOS calculations for Project Conditions were compared to the results for
Background Conditions to identify significant project Uaffic impacts. Implementation of the
proposed project would result in a si~ificant impact if the addition of project traffic caused:
1. The level of service at a key intersection operating at LOS D or better under
Background Conditions to deteriorate to LOS E or F, or
2. Increase in the critical movement delay at a key signalized intersection operating at
LOS E or F under Background Conditions by four (4) or more seconds and an
increase in the critical WC ratio by 0.01 or more.
The level of service at the Stevens Creek Boulevard/De An?a Boulevard or De Anza
BoulevardfBollinger Road intersections to operate at LOS E or worse with more than
45 seconds of average vehicle weighted delay, or
4. Degradation of the level of service at a CMP-monitored intersection operating at LOS
E or better under Background Conditions to LOS F, or
An increase in the critical movement delay at a CM?-monitored intersection operating
at LOS F under Background Conditions by four (4) or more seconds and an increase in
the critical WC ratio by 0.01 or more.
According to these criteria, the project will not cause a significant impact at any of the City or
CMP-monitored intersections.
D. Mitigation of Project Intersection Impacts
Since the project does not result in any significant intersection impacts, no mitigation measures
are required.
Fehr & Peem A~sociates, Inc.
Page 26
Cupertino Town Center Phase I TIA
June 2002
Table 7a
Background and Project (Phase 1) Signalized Intersection Levels of Service
Intersection I Back~ound [ Proiect
Hour [(sec): !LOS: i (sec) i LOS, Delay i V/Cz
De AnzaBlvd./ AM i 25.4 { D+ 25.4 i D+ 0.0 } 0.001
Stevens CreekBlvd.4 , PM . ! 29.6 ! D , 29.7 ! D 0.1 ~ 0.002
DeAnzaBlvd./ AM i 15.1 i C+ i 15.6 i C+ 0.7 {. 0.010
RodriguesAv~ue PM i 13..9,, ~ il B' ! 14.1 i B- 0.1 I'~ ..... 0.002
DeAnzaBlvd./ AM 18.0 i C i 18.0 i C I 0.1 [ 0.002
McClellan Road , PM , 27.6 i D+ i 27.6 ~ D+ 0.1 ..i 0.001
De.a~,:Blvd./ i AM i 20.3 i C i 20.5 [ Ci 0.2 i. 0.002
B°llingcr Rd.4 PM I 15.8 ! C+ f 15.8 I · C+ 0'0 i 0.001
Stevens Creek Blvd./ AM i 9.2 i B i 9.2 ! B 0.0 i 0.000
Stevens creek Blvd./ AM i 17.4 I C i 17.4
Blaney Ave. ,, PM i 20.5 i C ! 20.6 j C 0.0 i 0.002
BlaneyAve./ ] AM ~ 10.2 i B i 10.2 ~ B 0.0 i 0.000
Notes: ~ Whole intersection weighted average slopped delay expressed in seconds per vehicl~
: LOS calculations performed using the 1985 Highway Gapac~O, Manual methodology contained in TRAFFIX, a level of
service analysis program.
~ Incrcasc in average critical delay between Background and Projec~ Conditions.
Intersection
Table 7b
Background and Project (Phase 1) Unsignalized Intersection Levels of Service
Peak
Hour
All Way Stop Control;
Rodrigues Avenue / Torte Avenue AM I 10.3 B
PMt 10.7 B
Blaney Aved Kodrigues Ave.
Two-Way Stop Controt~
Backeround
Dela.v (sec.} LOS~
Project
I Dela~,(sec.}! LOR~
AM ! lS.S
PM j 17.9
10.4 B
10.8 B
19.2 C
18.2 C
SB Torte Avenue / Paeifiea Drive AM I 10.5 i B }
PM I 10.5 i B ,
Not~: : Dehy m~d LOS shown ,~,,~¢mt overall int~section for all-way stop conlrol inte~ec~iom
~ Delay and LOS shown reprm~nt worn.case mov~nent for two-way stop ~onlrolled int~rsec~om.
' LOS calculations ]~-formed ~sing the 1997 Hi~[hwa~ C~:i~ M~md methodoio~t
: B
10.6 i
10.6 I B
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Page 27
Cupertino Town Center Phase 1 TIA
June 2002
E. Site Access and On-Site Circulation
The site plan showing the location of the project driveways and the internal circulation system is
presented on Figure 2. The project will have shared access to driveways on De Anza Boulevard,
Rodrigues Avenue, and Torte Avenue. The site plan indicates that the Rodrigues Avenue
driveway is only 20 feet wide. It is recommended that this driveway be a minimum of 24 feet.
No other modifications to project site access are recommended.
The on-site circulation within the Phase 1 development was reviewed with turning templates and
the circulation for passenger cars was found to be adequate. No modifications to the site
circulation are recommended.
All of the s~reets in the vicinity of the project site have sidewalks on both sides, thus providing
adequate pedestrian access. Pedestrian pathways are provided from Rodrigues and Torte
Avenues to the Phase 1 development. With bufldout of the project site, pedestrian pathways
should be provided fxom the southern part of the Phase 1 development to the rest of the project
site. The site also has good bicycle access via the bike lanes on De Anza Boulevard.
F. Parking
The project site currently has 703 parking spaces. With Phase 1, the project site would provide
705 surface parking spaces of which 33 percent or 233 spaces wouldbe compact spaces. Phase 1
would also provide underground parking of 47 unistall parking spaces (including 2 handicapped
spaces). With Phase 1, there will be 752 parking spaces on the project site.
The adequacy of the proposed parlcing supply was evaluated by assessing the ciW's code
requirements, the surveyed existing parking demand, parking demands surveyed at other office
and other medical office buildings, and shared parking.
City Code Requirements
The City requires 1 space for every 285 square feet of office space and 1 space for every 175
square feet of medical office space. For restaurants (without a separate bar), the parking
requirement is 1 space per every 4 seats plus 1 space per employee plus 1 space per every 36
square feet of dance floor. The proposed restart will have 50 seats and is estimate to have 5
employees. Applying the city code requirements to the existing .and proposed uses yields a
parking requirement of 786 spaces. The proposed Phase 1 project would not meet the City's
parking requirements.
Fehr & Peers A~sociatez, Inc.
Page 28
Cupertino Town Center Phase 1 TIA
June 2002
On-Site Parking Surveys
Parking occupancy surveys were conducted at the project site during a morning and afternoon in
April 2002 to determine the existing parking demand. The surveyed peak parking demand was
410 parked vehicles. The current building occupancy at the project site is 81 percent. The peak
parking demand was divided by the current occupied space to determine the parking demand per
1,000 square feet, 2.79 parked vehicles per 1,000 s.f. This parking rate was then applied to the
building size on the entire site with the proposed Phase I project to determine the future parking
demand. The office and medical office buildings would have a future peak parking demand of
570 parked vehicles. Typically the parking supply (number of provided parking spaces) is
designed to be about 10 percent greater than the peak demand to account for vehicle circulation,
brining the estimated supply for the office and medical office buildings to 627 spaces. Adding
the required parking spaces for the restaurant results in an estimated parking supply of 645
parking spaces. Table 8 summarizes the parking survey data and peak parking estimates.
Although the project would provide less parking than required bythe City, the proposed parking
supply would meet the estimated peak parking demand.
Table 8
Parking Required vs. Parking Demand
Estimated
Land Use Size Parkin~ Required Parkin[~ Demand/Suppl?
Office ! 10,550 s.f. 388 280/308
Medical Office 66,518 s.f. 380 290/319
Restaurant 50 seats & 5 employees 18 16/18
Total 786 586/645
Notes: ~ Projected demand based on cxi.stin~ peak demand observed at 10:00am on April 16, 2002 and at 2:00pm on Alm'l 18, 2002. supply
is 10 pcroent greater than demand.
Source: Fehr & Peers Associates, lnc A]~ri12002
Other Parking Surveys
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. conducted parking surveys or has received the results of parking
surveys conducted at office buildings and one medical office building in other Bay Area cities.
The peak parking demand rates from these surveys and parlcing demand rates from the Institute
of Transportation Engineers, Parking Generation, 2"d Edition, are presented in Table 9.
Fehr & Peers A~sociates, Inc.
Page 29
Cupertino Town Center Phase 1 ~
June 2002
Table 9
Parking Demand Rates from ITE and Surveys at Bay Area Office
Buildings
I Demand Rate
Source (spaces per 1,000 [~.s.f.)
ITE Parking Generation
Office Park 2.52
C_~ae~ Office Buildin~ 2.79
Medical Office Building~ 4.11
Surveys of Office Buildings in Ba ~ Area
Oracle (1~195~000 l~.l.a.f.) 2.58t
Mountain Bay (151~000 ll.l.a.f.) 2.53t
C-reylanda Business Park 2.64
(475~000
Inktomi (280~000 a.f.) 2.25
Visa I (287,000 s.f.) 2.28
Visa II (297~000 a.f.) 2.55
A~ma (205,000 s.f.) 2.49
Surveys of Medical O~ce Buildings in Bay Area
Sports O~opedic
Rehabilitalion Medicine 5.00
Associates (14,900 a.f.)
~ Rate is based on gro~ leasable area
The peak parking demand rates for office spaces range from 2.28 to 2.79 spaces per 1,000 s.f.
The two rates for medical office building spaces are 4.11 and 5.00 spaces per 1,000 s.f.
Applying the highest rates to estimate the parking demands yields 308 parked vehicles for the
office space and 332 parked vehicles for the medical office space, for a combined peak peaking
demand of 640 parked vehicles. Adding ten percent yields a parking supply of 704 spaces for the
office and medical office space. The restaurant would require an additional 18 spaces for a total
of 722 spaces. The amount of parking provided exceeds the amount of parking needed based on
ITE and other survey rates.
Shared Parking
A shared parking analysis was conducted to determine whether the hourly variations in the
parking demands of the different uses would reduce the number of parking spaces for thc site.
The hourly parking demands for the office space, medical office space, and restaurant spaces '
were estimated separately using their differently hourly variatiom and peak parking demand
rates. The results are presented in Table C- 1 in Appendix C. The overall peak parking demand is
estimated to be 646 parked vehicles. The corresponding supply (adding ten percent) is 711
spaces.
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Page 30
Cupertino Town Center Phase 1 TIA
June 2002
Conclusions
The 752 spaces provided on site at the completion of Phase 1 do not meet the city's code
requirements. However, based on the site's surveyed parking demand and parking demands
surveyed at similar sites in the Bay Area, the provided parking supply is sufficient. The
restaurant will not reach it peak parking demand simultaneously with the office and medical
office space. Therefore, there will be an additional small reduction due to the mixed-use nature
of the site and the ability to share parking.
G. Transportation Demand Management Program
It is recommended that the project implement a Transportation Demand Management Program
(TDM). The purpose of the TDM Program is to identify measures to reduce the number of
parked vehicles and their trips, especially single-occupant automobile trips, generated by
employees of the Civic Park office development. A TDM Program is a set of strategies,
measures, and incentives to encourage employees to walk, bicycle, use public transportation,
carpool or use other alternatives to driving alone.
Convenience and cost are the primary factors that affect a person's choice of transportation
mode. Measures that work well for some people or types of businesses do not work as well for
others. Therefore, au effective TDM program provides multiple options and incentives and is
flexible to meet the varied needs of individual employees and employers. Elements to be
included in the program are described in Appendix D.
H. Neighborhood Traffic Issues
Most of the proj eot traffic is expected to approach and depart via De Anza Boulevard. However,
some traffic will use neighborhood streets such as Rodrigues Avenue and Pacifica Drive. Daily
traffic volume on Rodrigues Avenue east of Torre Avenue provided by the City of Cupertino
indicate that there are currently 4,368 vehicles. The gate on Pacifica Drive east of Torre Avenue
is now inoperable. Machine counts conducted on Pacifica Avenue on April 30, 2002 show that
2,801vehicles per day are using Pacifica Drive east of Torre Avenue.
Proj eot traffic would access De Anza Boulevard ~om Rodrigues Avenue, west of Torre Avenue.
The proj eot would add approximately 190 vehicles per day to this portion of Rodrigues Avenue.
The project would also add traffic to the residential portion of Rodrigues Avenue, east of Torre
Avenue. Approximately 106 vehicles per day are projected to be added to Rodrigues Avenue
near Blaney Avenue. This traffic volume includes some vehicles coming from the east on
Bollinger Road traveling up Blaney Avenue to Rodrigues Avenue to access the project site. This
traffic is less than 3 percent of the existing daily tra~c on Rodrigues Avenue. This additional
traffic is not considered a significant impact.
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Page 31
Cupertino Tov~n Center Phase ] ~,4
June 2002
As noted above, the gate on Pacifica Drive is currently inoperable. The gate is typically closed
between 5:30am and 8:30am and 4:00pm and 5:30pm. J/the gate were to remain inoperable,
some of the pwj ect traffic may use Pacifica Drive east of Torre Avenue to access the project site.
Approximately 38 vehicles per day (less than 2 percent of'the ex/sting daily tm~c) are projected
to use Pacifica Drive, east of Torre. This additional traffic is not considered a significant impact.
Silverado Avenue is an east-west street located between De Anza Boulevard and Whitney Way.
The western portion of the street is lined with commercial uses while the eastern portion is lined
with residential uses. The daily volume is appro~irnately ?$0 vehicles per day. This daily volume
is within the range of typical volumes for local residential meets.
Residents have expressed concern regarding the volume and speed of tra~c on Silverado
Avenue. The project is not expected to add traffic to this roadway. Therefore, it will not cause a
neighborhood intrusion impact.
Fehr & Peers Associatez, Inc.
Page
Cupertino Town Center Phase 1
June 2002
CHAPTER 6 -PROJECT BUILDOUT CONDITIONS
This chapter presents the results of thc level of service calculations under Project Buildout
Conditions. Project Buildout Conditions are defined as buildout of the project site including trips
generated by Phase 1 added to background volumes. The analysis of Project Buildout
Conditioas has been provided for informational purposes. The detailed Waffle impacts for
buildout of the project site will be studied ia a separate tra~e study.
A. Project Buildout Traffic Estimates
Phase 2 includes 130,000 square feet of office space, 15,000 square feet of medical orifice space,
130 aparUnents, 10,000 square feet of retail space and a 10,000-square foot restaurant. Phase 2
would remove approximately 39,000 square feet of medical office space and 26,500 square feet
of office space. Five existing buildings totaling 83,600 square feet would remain on the project
site. Trips estimates for Phase 2 were based on ITE trip generation rates. Reduction for internal
trips was estimated following VTA guidelines. The trip generation estimates for Phase 1 and
Phase 2 are presented in Table 10. Buildout~ as proposed, is estimated to add a total of 3,253
daily trips, 323 AM peak-hour trips and 355 PM peak-hour trips.
The trips generated by Phase 2 were assigned to the roadway system using the trip distribution
patterns identified for Phase 1. It was assumed that with buildout of the project site, a signalized
access driveway on DeAnza Boulevard between Rodrigues Avenue and Pacifica Drive would be
provided. These trips were added to the Projeet Conditions volumes. The results are presented on
Figure 12.
B. Project Buildout Intersection Levels of Service
Intersection operations were evaluated with level of Service calculations and the results are
summarized in Tables 11a and 11b, for signalized and un.~ignalized intersections, respectively.
The intersection LOS calculation sheets for this scenario are included ia Appendix B.
Under Buildout Conditions, all of the study intersections are projected to operate at LOS D or
better. According to VTA standards, all of the study intersections would operate at an acceptable
level under Buildout Conditions.
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Page 33
Cupertino Town Center Phase ] TIA
June 2002
Table 10
Bufldout Trip Generation Estimates
i ! Trip Rat~I ] Number of Trips
! i AM PM I i AM Pesk Hour I PM Peak Hour
~, Pe~k Peak i In Out Total t In Out Total
Land Usex I Size i , ~
~emov~) i 26,500 s.f. 11.01 1.56 1.49 (291) i (36) (5) (41)t (7) (32) (39)
~e~°~d) i39,000s.f. 36.~3 2.43 3.66 (L410)~
~ ~ I (?6) (~9) (gJ) , (39) 0o4) 043)
113o,o00 i
O~ce i s.f. 11.01 1.56 lA9 1,431 ! 202 28 230 38 187 225
Xutem~maon (apt~) (26)I (2) (0) (2) 1(0) (~) (2)
~ 130 i
Apartments i urfits i 6.63 0.51 0.62 862!11 55 66 54 27 81
~n~'mat~a~on'(omce) 3% (26) i (0) (2) (2) (2) (0) (2)
~ut=n~on (r~) 13% (112) i (1) (S) (9) (7) (4)
Retail 10,000a.f.i 40.67 na 2.59 407 ] 0 0 0 ! 11 15 26
Restaurant i 10,0005.£i. , 130.34 i, 9.27 ] 10.86 1,303 ii 48 45 93 ] 65 ~t4 109
In~malizafion(apts) i (112)i (8) (1) (9) I(4) (7) (11)
NetNewPhase2Trips] 2,568 i 167 100 267 t 123 163 286
NetNewPharel Trips(from Table 6) ! 685 i 40 16 56I 26 43 69
Net New Bulldout Trips I 3,253 i 207 116 323 I 149 206 35S
2 Daily Wip tale is p~ 1000 a.f. or per unit
~ Medical Office Building
Source: Trip ra~ from/~p G~wet/on Catstit~ of?rampomfion Engineers, Sixth Edfdon). Trips nnluctiom based on VFA ~id¢lines.
C. Project Bufldout Intersection Impacts
The results of the LOS calculations for Buildout Conditions were compared to the results for
Background Conditions to identify significant project traffic impacts based on the LOS criteria
identified in Chapter 5. According to those criteria, the project would not cause a significant
intersection impact at any of the City or CMP intersections.
D. Mitigation of Project Buildout Intersection Impacts
Since buildout of the project site does not result in any significant intersection impacts, no
mitigation measures are required.
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Page 34
Key:
00(00) = AM (PM)
~ ~'- 140 (132)
~2 (1365)~ ~ ~
(142)
,~- 1~o ('122)
)(-82 (64)
Cupertino Town Center
PROJECT BUILDOUT PEAK- HOUR.TRAFFIC VOLUMES
June 2002
458-21-O1
FIGURE 12
Cupertino Town Center Phase 1 TIA
June 2002
Table lla
Background and Bufldout Signalized Intersection Levels of Service
Intersection i Back2round ! Buildout
Peak i Delay i ! Delay i t AinCrit. i A inCrit.
Hour i (sec)' ! LOS~ i (sec) i LOSl Delay ! V/C~
De A-nzaBlvd./ AM ! 25.4 i D+ i 25.2 i D+i 0.1 ~ 0.007
Stevem Creek Blvd.~ PM ! 29.6' i D I 30.0 i D 0.8 i 0.018
'DeAnzaBlvd./ AM !"l 15.1 ~I C+ [, 16.5 i C+ 2.5 i 0.043
Rodri~uesAvenue PM ! 13.9 [ B- ! 14.7I B- 0.7 i 0.017
MeClellan Road PM I 27.6 ! D+ ! 27.8 ~_. I 0.4 ! 0.009
De--Blvd./ AM [ 20.3 C ~ 20.5 i (2 0.3 ~ 0.007
Bolli~r Rd.~
~,M ! 15.8 i c+ ! 15.7 ! c+ o.o o.oo3
i o.o ! o.ooo
Torr~Ave., PM i 8.9 ! B I 9.3 i B,. 0.0 t 0.000
' ~ i C. 0.0 ~ 0.008
St~ven~ Creek Blvd./ AM ~ 17.4 i C ., 17.4 ~
Blan~yAve. PM I 20.5 i ¢ ~
~ I 20.7 I 12 0.1 t 0.010
~ 0.000
Bl~,,~^veJ AM 10.2 { B i 10.2 ! ~ 0.0 ~
Bollin~rRd. PM ~ 11.2 ! B ! 11.2 ! B ~ 0.0 i 0.006
No~: ~ Whole in~r~'tion w,i~h~l ~t~'aS~ ~ delay ~t in .~ad~ p~- vehi¢l~
~ I. DS mleulafion~ l~rfoma~l ~i~ thc 1985 H~n~a>, Ca/~y Mmda/m~hodolo~. conmin~l in TRAFFIX, a l~v¢l of
IIl!
Table llb
Background and Buildout Umignalized Intersection Levels of Service
~ Backuround Buildout
Intersection
· Peak
! Hour Delay
~ AM 10.3 i B ] 1019
Rodrigues Avenue / Tone Avenue
i PM 10.7 . B ~ 11.5
Blaney Ave./Rodrigues Ave. I AM 18.8 i CI 22.1
i PM 17.9 i C ! 20.4
Two-Way Stop Control~
SB Torte Avenue / Pacifica Drive { AM } 10.5 I B I 10.6
Notes: ~ 'Delay and LOS shown r~r~sent overall intmecfion for all-way stop tonal intexsemions
~ Delay and LOS shown m~sent wont. case movement for two-way stop comrolled intersections.
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Page 36
Cupertino To~n Center Phase l TI.4
June 2002
E. Parking
Parking for full buildom of the project site would be provided via four parking garages and
surface parking for a total of 1,387 parking spaces on-site. Table 12 summarizes the City of
Cupertino parking requirements for each land-use component of the project. Applying the city
code requirements to each use individually yields a parking requirement of 1,372 spaces. The
proposed parking supply would meet the City's parking requirements.
· Table 12
Summa~ of Cit~ Parking Requirements
Number of Spaces
Land Use Size City Code Required
Office 2i4,105 s.f. 1 spacc per 285 s.f. 751
Apartmen~ 130 units 2 spaces per unit 260
Medical Offices 42,500 s.f. 1 space per 175 s.f. 243
Retail 10,000 s.f. 1 space per 250 s.f. 40
Restaurants 250 seats 1 space per 4 seats and 1 per
~mployee~ 78
Total 1,372
Source: City of Cupertino Municipal Code, February 2001.
~ Assumes a total of 15 employees
Fehr & Peers A~sociates, Inc.
Page 37
Cupertino Town Center Phase I 17,4
dune 2002
CHAPTER 7 - EXPECTED GROWTIt CONDITIONS
This chapter presents the results of the level of service calculations under Expected Growth
Conditions. Expected Growth Conditions are defined as existing volumes that are increased by
an annual growth factor through the project's completion date, plus traffic generated by approved
but not yet constructed developments in the project study area, plus traffic generated by the
proposed project. A completion date of Fall 2003 is anticipated for the Phase 1 of the proposed
project. The completion date of Phase 2 is expected to be Fall 2007, so the Expected Growth
Conditions used the Fall 2007 date and included both Phase 1 and Phase 2 traffic.
A. Expected Growth Traffic Estimates
Expected Growth volumes were estimated by expanding existing volumes by applying an annual
growth rate of 1.2 percent (or 8.4 percent over a seven-year period fxom the count date), and
adding lxaffic fxom approved developments and the proposed project (Phase 1 and Phase 2).
Expected Growth traffic volumes are presented on Figure 13.
B. Expected Growth Intersection Levels of Service
Intersection operations were evaluated with level of service calculations and the results are
summarized in Tables 13a and 13b, for signalized and umignalized intersections, respectively.
The intersection LOS calculation sheets for this scenario are included in Appendix B.
Under Expected Growth Conditions, all of the study intersections are projected to operate at LOS
D or better during both peak hours. Aeeorcling to VTA standards, all of the study intersections
would operate at an acceptable level under Expected Growth Conditions.
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Page $8
75-
Key:
00(00) = AM (PM)
~ 1204 (1457)
~ ~ 140 (14o)
121 (17o)-~ ~l I~'
820 (1472)--I"' [ ~
88 (85)-~'
100 (20~)--~
35 (40)--~
167 (13o).-/
104 (92)-"B"
2o~ (514)'~,
4--205 (131)
~ 87
~,-. (71)
d'-- 80 (122)
~51 (187)
McClellan
~ I~' ~'-.40 (20)
'4--101 (28)
120 (167)'~
39 (01~
r,I
1~47 (108)
L.J ~ 142 (238)
20 (22)-'~ =
141 (211)-~'
748
26 (132)"'-~
X_.45 (07)
.,i.-- 1176 (1453)
®
Cupertino Town Center
· ~.~,o,,,,,,,,,,c,.,..,,,,,,. EXPECTED GROWTH PEAK- HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
J.no 2O02 FIGURE 13
458-21-01
Cupertino Town Center Phase 1 TL4
June 2002
Table
Expected Growth Signalized Intersection Levels of Service
I Peak Delay
Intersection
i' SolIl' (SEC)1 .. LOS1
De ~,,~ Blvd. / Steve=s Creek Blvd.~ ! AM 23.8 C-
: PM 32.7 D
De Anza Blvd. / Rodrigues Avgnu= I AM 16.9 C'+
PM 14.9 B-
De Anza Blvd. / McClellan ROad i AM "' 19.2 C
~I PM 30.6 D
De Anza Blvd. / Bollinger Road ! AM 25.8 D+
~ PM 16.5 C
Stevens Creek BI;& / T s~re Avenue i AM 9.6
[ PM 9.4 B
Stevens Creek Blvd. /Blaney Aveaue i AM 18.0 I C
i PM 21.5 C
Bolling~r Road / Blaney Av~ntm i AM 10.5 B
i PM 11.7 B
Notes: ~ Whole in,section weighted average stopped dehy ~.,4,,~sed in seconds per vehicle
2 LOS calcuhfions p~rformed using the 1985 Highway Capac~ Manual methodology with sajusted saturation flow rates.
Table 13b
Expected Growth Intersection Levels of Service
Blaney Ave. / Rodrigues Ave.
i Peak !
Delay
Intersection .. Hour 1; {sec}'
All Way Stop Control~
Rodrigues Ave. / Torre Ave. I AM I 11.5
PM I 27.0
rwo-tgay Stop Control~
SB Tone Ave. / Pacitica Dr. I AM I 10.8
PM ! 10.7
Notes: ~ Delay ~d LOS shown represont ~ inters~:t/on for ~ll-way stop ~om)i in2rs~/ons
2 Dehy md LOS shown n~c~at v~'t.c~se mov~mmt fro' two-way stop conlrolkd in.sections.
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Page 40
7'7
Cupertino Town Center Phase 1 TIA
dune 2002
CHAPTER 8 - YEAR 2010 CONDITIONS
This chapter presents the results of the level of service calculations under Year 2010 Conditions.
Year 2010 Conditions are defined as existing volumes that are increased by an a~nual growth
factor through 2010, plus traffic generated'by approved but not yet constructed developments in
the project study area, plus traffic generated by the proposed project, plus pending projects
expected in the study area.
A. Year 2010 Traffic Estimates
Year 2010 volumes were estimated by expanding existing volumes by applying an annual growth
rate of 1.2 percent (or 12 percent over a ten-year period), and adding traffic from approved
developments, the proposed project and pending projects. Seven pending projects were included
in the 2010 traffic analysis. Their locations and estimated trips are summarized in Table 14.
Year 2010 traffic volumes are presented on Figure 14.
O
Table 14
Pendin[l Developments .
I i i AM Peak i PM Peak
· i I Hour ' Hour
Project Name I Location i Description
' i Trips ~ Trips
i 3,500-seat cinema
L. Plaza Cupertino Stevens Creek and i 25,000 s.f. restaurant
Wolfe Road i 400 hotel rooms,t 966 ~! 1,589
~ 500 du apartments
Homestead Rd and i
M. Villa Serra Stelling Rd i 924 du apartments i 471 i 573
N. De Anza College Stevens Creek Blvd ~
Expansion I and Stellinl~ Rd i 7,000 rodents i 980 i 1190
O. Compaq Computers Stevens Creek between i 7'50,000 s.f. R&D
Campus Tamau and Finch I 19,500 s.f. rem~l
! 400 du apartments
P. Town Center South De Anza and Town i 30,000 s.f. relail
Center Im i 29,000 s.f. medical office I 326,i 390
i 1~6,ooo s.f. office
Stevens Creek and i 56 du t°wnhomes i 25 [ 30
Q. Su~-~'rHill Homes Iml~, erial Ave !
I i 35 lmfoffic¢
I De Anza and Valley ~ ' i 53
Cupertino
Gateway
[ 5 ksfrestaumut
i Green ! 20 du apariments
To. Trips{ 4,034 i 5,102
Source: City of Cupertino Depanment of Planning (June 2002).
Fehr & Peers Arsociates, Inc.
Page 41
Cupertino Town Center'Phase 1 27A
June 2002
B. Year 2010 Intersection Levels of Service
Intersection operations were evaluated with level of service calculations and the results are
summarized in Tables 1Sa and 15b, for signalized and unsignalized intersections, respectively.
The intersection LOS calculation sheets for this scenario are included in Appendix B.
The following three intersections are projected to operate at LOS E during either the A_M and/or
PM peak hour under Year 2010 Conditions:
· De Anza Boulevard and McClellan Road (PM peak hour)
· De Anza Boulevard and Bollinger Road (AM peak hour)
· Blaney Avenue and Rodrigues Avenue (AM peak hour)
The De Anza Boulevard/Bollinger Road intersection would operate at LOS E+ (with 42.2
seconds of delay), which would meet the City's LOS standard for this intersection. The project
would contribute to these cumulative lxaffic impacts. All of the other key intersections are
projected to operate at acceptable levels during both peak hours. According to VTA standards,
all of the study intersections would operate at an acceptable level under Year 2010 Conditions.
The City has a planned improvement at the intersection of De Anza Boulevard and McClellan
Road. This improvement includes adding a second northbound left-turn lane on De Anza
Boulevard and restricting Pacifiea Drive to fight tums only. With these improvements, the
intersection would operate at LOS D during the PM peak hour. Phase 1 would contribute 0.2
percent of the total traffic at this intersection and buildout of the project site is approximately
one percent of the total traffic.
A signal warrant analysis was conducted for the Blaney Avenue and Rodrigues Avenue
intersection. The 2010 AM and PM peak hour volumes were found to meet the Caltrans peak
hour volume warrant. According to guidelines in the Caltrans Traffic Manual, the decision to
install traffic signals should not be based solely on the satisfaction of warrants. Installation of
traffic signals should also be based upon other factors such as delay, congestion, driver
confusion, etc. In addition, installing a h'a~c signal at these two residential sweets may have
unwanted effects such as an increase in traffic volumes at this intersection. The City of
Cupertino will ultimately determine the need for a traffic signal at this loeafiom
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Page 42
Key:
00(00) = AM (PM)
343 (307)-~'
591 (1057)'""~
t4~ (272)"~
~ 283 (274)
.d-- 907 (lO07)
l"- 208 (486)
Stevens Creek
,~ ~.- $7 (41)
'4--1414(1745)
~-- 155 (164)
' I S~ev~'~'~ Creek
62 (~)~ ~ ~
oo (87)-/i
110 (212)-'~'
36 (41)~ i
d.-211 (134)
~,-00 (so)
~'~ ~-47 (106)
145 (217)-/
031
2S (13~)"'4
*--1385(1762)
~oo (3s8)
®
Cupertino Town Center
~'~ ~.,HR& PEI~ AS~IATi~ INC.
~,~o,=...c...~,., YEAR 2010 PEAK- HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES
j~. 2002 FIGURE 14
458-21-01
Cupertino Town Center Phase 1
June 2002
Table
Year 2010 Signalized Intersection Levels of Service
i Peak Delay
Intersection ! Hour (sec)l LOSa
Dc Anza Blvd. / Stevens Creek Blvd.3 i AM 27.1 I D+
, PM 39.4, D-
De Anza Blvd. / Rodrigu~a Avenue i AM 17.2 I C
~ PM 14.9 B-
De Aaza Blvd. / McClellan Road I AM 20.3 C
I PM 44.0
De Anza Blvd. / Bollinge~ Road i AM 42.2
i PM 17.0 C
Steveas Creek Blvd. / Tor~ Avenue i AM 9.1 B
i 9.4
Stevens Creek Blvd. / Blaney Av~nu~ i AM 1 $.2 ! C
i PM 22.4I C
Bolling~ Road / Blaney Avenue ] AM 10.6 I B
J PM 12.2I B
Notes: ~ Whole intersection weighted avcraSc stopped &lay expressed in scconds per vehicle
~ LOS calculations p~formcd usil~ the 1985 H~ghway ~ Mamu~ methodology with adjusted saturation flow rates.
Intersection
All ~ay Stop Control~
Table l~*b
Year 2010 Intersection Levels of Service
Peak
Hour
Delay
LOS2
Rodrigues Ave. / Torte Ave.
Blaney Ave. / Rodrigue~ Ave.
AM i 11.9
PM } 12.5
AM t 39.6
I 34.5
PM
B
B
E
D
Two-Way Stop Control~
SB Torte Ave. / Pacifica Dr. AM i 11.0
PM i 11.0
: Delay and LOS shown ~ wo~t-ca~e mov~nmt for two-way ~op conUoll~ int~m~.
B
B
Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc.
Page 44
Cupertino Town Center Phase I
dune 2002
CHAPTER 9 - CONCLUSIONS
The proposed Phase 1 project is estimated to generate 515 net-new daily trips, 50 net-new AM
peak-hour trips and 54 net-new PM peak-hour trips. The impacts of the proposed development
on the surrounding roadway system were evaluated following guidelines of the City of Cupertino
and the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). The operations of the key
intersections in the vicinity of the site were evaluated for the following scenarios:
Scenario 1:
Existing Conditions. Existing volumes obtained from counts,
representing peak one-hour traffic conditions during the morning
and evening commute periods.
Scenario 2:
Background Conditions. Existing peak-hour volumes plus traffic
from approved but not yet constructed developments in the study
area.
Scenario 3:
Project Conditions. Background peak-hour volumes plus Phase 1
project-generated traffic.
Scenario 4:
Project Buildout Conditions. Background peak-hour volumes
plus Phase 1 and 2 project-generated traffic. (informational
purposes only)
Scenario 5:
Expected Growth Conditions. Existing volumes increased by an
annual growth factor of 1.2 percent per year to the projected
opening date of Phase 2 (Fall 2007) plus approved trips plus
Phase 1 and Phase 2 project traffic.
Scenario 6:
Year 2010 Conditions. Existing volumes increased by an annual
growth factor of 1.2 percent per year to the year 2010 plus Phase
1 and Phase 2 project traffic plus traffic from approved and
pending developments.
A. Intersection Impacts
Project intersection impacts were evaluated according to criteria of the City of Cup~o and the
Santa Clara County Congestion Management ProgrTM. According to the City's LOS impact
criteria, a project is defined 'as causing a significant impact if the addition of project traffic
causes an intersection to operate at LOS E or F or exacerbates LOS E or F operations at
signalized intersections by increasing the critical movement delay by four or more seconds. The
results of the analysis showed that the project development would not have a significmat impact
on any of the study intersections.
Fehr & Peers Associate~, Inc.
Page 45
Cupertino Town Center Phase 1 TLI
June 2002
B. Other Issues
Several other issues were evaluated in the TIA. These include:.
1. Site access points s~ving the site.
2. Parking
3. Neighborhood traffic issues
The project's primary access points are via a driveway on Rodrigues Avenue and a driveway on
Torre Avenue. The proposed project will have shared access with the existing buildings to
driveways on De Anza Boulevard and other driveways on Rodrigues Avenue and Tone Avenue.
It is recommended that the Rodrigues Avenue driveway be a minimum of 24 feet wide.
Adequate on-site vehicle circulation would be provided on the project site. It is recommended
that with buildout of the project site, pedestrian pathways be provided from the southern pan of
the Phase 1 development to the rest of the project site. Adequate bicycle access xvould be
provided to the project site.
At the end of Phase 1, the project site would provide 752 parking spaces which is 33 part4ng
spaces less than the City's requirement of 785 parking spaces. Based on the existing parking
occupancy of the project site and surveys conducted for other office and medical office
buildings, the proposed parldng supply would meet the expected parking demand. At the
completion of Phase 2, the project site would provide 1,387 parking spaces, 15 spaces more finn
the City's required parking of 1,372 parking spaces.
The project should implement a Transportation Demand Management CIE)M) Program to reduce
the number of single-occupant vehicles and its overall parking demand.
Phase 1 will increase the existing daily traffic on Rodrigues Avenue east of Torte Avenue by
approximately 2.5 percent, ffthe gate on Pacifica Drive remaln.~ inoperable, the Phase 1 project
would also add approximately 1.5 percent of existing daily traffic on Pacifica Drive east of Torte
Avenue. These increases in traffic volume are not considered a significant impact.
Fehr & Peers Associate~, Inc.
Page 46
APPENDIX A
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE
CALCULATION SI~F~ETS
COMPARE
Thu Jun t3 14:49:05 2002
cdty of Cuperuno
Town Center
AM Peak Hour
LOS (sec)
A 0.4 0.452
C- 23.4 0.737 22.0
B- 14.5 0.567 11.0
C 17.3 0.701 14.5
C t9.8 0.878 20.4
8 8.8 0270 5.7
C t7.2 0.488 t7.9
B 102 0.349 102
B t0.4 0.000 t0.4
C 18.5 0.809 18.5
B t02 0.483 t0.3
0.4 A
D+
¢
B
B
B
B
Avg
Avg CHI
Del Cdl Del
LOS (sec) V/C (sec)
0.5 0.543 0.5
25.4 0.767 23.8
t5.1 0.583 11.3
t8.0 0.721 152
20.3 0.890 21.3
0.2 0.319 8.8
t7.4 0.509 18.3
10.3 0.357 10.3
10.5 0.000 t0.5
18.8 0.813 18.8
10.2 0.483 10.3
Phaea 1AM
Avg Avg
Avg C~I Cdl
Del Cdt V/C Del Del
LOS (~ec) VIC C~-,-w (sec)
A 0.5 0.540 + 0.002 0.6 + 0.1
D* 25.4 0.787 + 0.001 23.9 + 0.8
C+ 15.8 0.593 4. 0.010 12.0 + O.T
C 18.0 0.723 4. 0.002 15.2 + 0.1
C 20.5 0.89~ + 0.002 21.4 4- 0.2
B 8.2 0.3t9 4. 0.000 8.8 + 0.8
C 17.4 0.511 4.0.00t t8.3 +0.0
B 10.4 0.363 4. 0.006 10.4 + 0.t
B t0.6 0,000 * 0.000 10.6 4- 0.0
C 19.1 0.820 '~ 0.007 19.1 + 0.3
B t0'9 0.483 4. 0.000 t0.3 - 0.0
LOS
Avg
Av~ Cdt
Del Cdt Dd
(sec) v/C (sec)
A 3.0 0.605 3.5
D+ 252 0.774 23.0
C4- t6.5 0.625 13.8
C 18.2 0.730 15.4
C 20.5 0.897 21.5
B 9.6 0.319 8.8
C t7.4 0.5t7 18.3
B t0.9 0.392 10.0
O 10.6 0.000 10.6
C 22.1 O.BS~ 22.t
B 10.2 0.483 10.3
· ~ ~b~ am '4-- ' r
A~rOicht Jorth Bound south ~d hmt ~d Welt
~tr b - T - ! G - T - ! b - T - ! b -
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... I
.i..~.~, ? ,o ~o ? zo zo ? ~o ~o I"-?""o- -- .... -'~oI
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... {{ ............... I
~b M{~ 1.0~ 1.00 1.0~ 1.0~ i.o~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.~ 1.00 I.OO
~ ~ol * O 0 · 0 · · 0 0 o 0 0 O
ATZz 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Uler Mit Z.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00 Z.00 ~.00 Z.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00
l~t Vol~ 0 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 · 0 0 0
~ M~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~F M~* 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~it/~e~ 11~0 1100 1100 1~00 llO0 1~00 1~00 ilO0 110~ 1100 1100
~els 3.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.16
F~nal Sat.~ 3100 5700 1700 3100 S700 1700 3150 S?00 17S0 3100 ~262 1336
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... II ............... I
~1/81~= 0;17 0.33 0.11 0.09 0.0~ 0.13 0.09 0.08 0.0S 0.07 0.~S
~e~ TIMJ J~.0 S3.6 12.8 IS.3 38.8 38,8 10.~ 10.0 ~9.0 30.3 34,9
Vol~/Cmp~ 0.S3 0.74 0.17 0.74 0.40 0.02 0.74 0.90 0.12 0.38 0.74 0,74
~%lylVeh~ 2S.4 22.1 S.0 43.2 20.2 30.3 4].1 S5.9 %6.0 27.S 35.6 30.6
~]my ~J= 1.00 l. O02.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O01.00
M~l/Veh~ 20.4 ~0.9 3.1 43.~ 12.3 l~.? 43.1 55.4 14.S 27.S 33.S 33.S
A~proncht Worth Bound bth Bound hit Bound Welt Bouml
~ovement~ r, . T - R b - T - R b - T - ! b - ? -
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... Il ...............
Win. Oreen: ? lO 10 ? lo lO 7 10 '10 7 lO 1o
............ I ............... I~ ............... ~1 ............... Il ...............
Volume
Bale vol= 539 1841 200 294 541 217 297 429 I? 219 651 204
~r(~b Ad~t 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 %.00 1.00
%nl~/&! Bmet539 1041 200 204 041 217 307 439 07 219 651 304
Added Vol~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial ~utzSSI 1874 201 3%9 54? 210 301 4?0 103 336 600 216
Vier Ad~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~ Ad~= 1.00 1.0· %.BO 1.00 l. O0l.O0 1.00 1.00 l. O0l. O0 l.O02.00
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ...............
Sit.ration Flow )~od~le~
............ I ............... il ............... II ............... II ............... I
Capacity Analylil Bodulez
0zeell TiM: 39.3 51,4 02.2 10.8 20.0 21.0 15.0 10.0 49.3 30.? 2S.? 25.?
.4.
Al~roacht Earth Bound South Bound Bait Bound gait Bound
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... II ............... I
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
Orovtb Ad:J: 1.00 1.00 1.00 X.00 X.00 X.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 X.00 X.00 X.00
Addod Vol~ 3 3 0 0 10 0 0 0 6 0 0 0
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... II ............... I
fetur&tioa Flow Modular
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
capacity Am~lygil Nodular
VoltIe~C~p: O.qO 0.77 0,31 0.77 0.43 0.54 0.77 0.9! O.IS 0.3~ 0.77 0.77
IMIaF AdJ~ l. O0 l. O0 l. O0 l.O0 1.00 l.O0 1.00 l.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Volume Nodular
............ I ...............Il ...............Il ............... Il ...............I
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
Capacity Analycia ~:~dule~
IMiay/Veb: 20.3 33.2 5.3 ~(.I 30.6 31.3 4S,I 71.0 16.7 27.6 30.1 30.1
D*IayMJ~ L00 L00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L00
MJ~l/Veh: 30.2 IL9 3.3 44.4 ~3.9 13.3 40.1 70.9 14.~ 27.6 3*,t 34.0
0107: DeAnzl Blvd. · Rcd~guel A'v~.
Approacht JWorth Bound Bouth Bound lilt: Bound West: Bound
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... Il ............... I
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............I
volmue J;,od~le t
1~ ~dJ~ 1.o0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0o 1.0o 1.00 1.00 1.0o 1.oo 1.0o
............ I ...............Il ...............II ...............II ...............I
Capacity ~1~1f Pk~dulef
Delay A~J: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Pkmm eAM
In~uecW~#tO~ De~nnBhd · ~deeA~
............ J ............... II ............... II ............... II
N~. ~t 7 ~0 ~O 7 lO ~0 7 1O 10 7 ~0
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... II ...............
~I~ ~le~
~le Volt 10 2216 ~6 161 S(6 ~1 ~7 49 ~ 30 S~ 1~7
~b .Mit 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00
~ Volt 0 J J 16 2 0 0 0 0 I 0 3
ATI t 3 S3 0 J 27 0 O 3 0 30 ~ 0
Uler MBt 1.001.00 1.0O 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
~ MBt 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L00 1.001.00 1.00
~t Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I~ Volt 83 3371 d9 ~O? S~S 3X 97 S1 16 67 60 130
fl MBt 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
~ MBt l.O~1.00 1.00 1.00 t.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0o1.00 1.00
f~l ~1. ~ 83 2371 4~ ~87 SgS 2~ J7 SI 16 07 S0 130
............ I ............... Ii ............... Il ............... Ii ...............
ht~ati~ fl~
8at/~e, lO00 1O0O Il00 IS00 lO00 1800 lO00 1800 lO00 lO00 1800 1800
M~uMt: 0.91 1.0J 0.J7 0.97 1.04 L00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.J7 1.0t 0.97
~el~ 1.00 3.00 L00 1.00 3,B6 0.14 1.00 0.76 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00
frill ~t. ~ 17S0 S700 X7S0 1750 72e4 2S6 ITS0 1370 430 XTS0 X~00 ITS0
............ I ............... I~ ............... Il ............... IJ ...............
Vol/~ 0.0S 0.i0 0.03 0.11 0.08 0.0l 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.07
~ TiNt 7.0 93.0 93.0 25.0 111 111.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 30.0
Vol--/Cap: 0.94 0.S0 0.04 0.60 0.100.10 0.78 0.02 0.03 Q.S4 0.44 0.30
~lay/veh~ 104,4 ~0.~ s.2 42.S 2.S 2.s IS.5 SO.J So.J Sl,l 49.9 32.S
~IBF ~J: 1.00 ~.00 1.00 l.oo 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00 It00
Pr~JFc~r~ L00 0.80 0.15 1.00 0,OS0,aS 1.00 0.80 0.80 1.00 0.05 0.OS
MJ~l/Vehr 104.4 8.6 S.3 43.S 3.1 ~ 3.1 60.S 43.0 43.0 SI.I 41.6 27.S
~e~eue, 6 66 I X2 ~0 · 7 4 I S 4
M #t0~: D*~ul Blvd. · ~,~,~,l~eo Ave.
Approach** ~or~h Bound South JoEid lilt ~ Weet lou~d
Movmt ~ L - T - It r. . T - · L - T - · L - T o ·
............ I ............... Il ............... II ............... Il ............... I
NAn. Ozeen: 7 l0 l0 7 l0 10 7 X0 lO 7 10 l0
............ I ............... it ............... Il ............... Il ............... J
Volume Module t
hie Volt l0 ~t316 00 103 SSS 0! 97 4! 10 30 S9 137
OEovth AdJt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 X.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bee, l0 3210 40 163 SSS ll 97 49 16 36 S! 1~7
Added ~olt 0 30 X! S7 53 0 0 0 0 6 O 30
ATI: 3 03 0 0 07 0 O 0 0 30 - I 0
Znitlal rut: 03 2304 64 020 446
User AdJt l.oo 1.oo 1.os 3.oo l.OO l.oo 1.o0 l.oo l.O0 1.oo 1.,O~o 1.oo
PHIf AdJt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O0 1.00 1.00 l. O0 1.00 1.O0 l. O0
Saturation rlov Nodule~
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... Il ............... I
~m~ m~
Inle~ec0on #10~: OeAnz~ 9k~l . & McCtdam RdA'llkm D~, k/r~edlon #t08 : I)~ksza Okd . & MeCleilm Rd JPacJlkm Dr .
t
............ I ...............II ...............~1 ...............~1 ...............I
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............
Iteduct Vol~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PCB AdJ: l. O0 l. O0 1.00 1.00 l.O0 l.O0 1.00 1.00 l. O0 1.00 1,00 1.00
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............I
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............I
bl~ 0100: D~BMI . & McC38Im Rd~PaCIcl ~.
,. : ~" .Ob,-- ..
t
~t: b - T - R b - T - ! L - T - R L - T -
............ I ............... {{ ............... Il ............... IJ ...............
HLn. ~eu: 7 Z0 10 7 l0 ~0 7 10 l0
............ { ............... JJ ............... {J ............... Il ...............
~oe Vol~ 4~1 3S7~ 10X 46 637 4 14~ J3 119
~h Mit 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 X.00 1.00 ~.00 ~.00 ~.00 1.00
~ ~Xt 0 4 3 0 ~ 0 I 0 0 3 X 0
ATZt 0 43 3 9 40 0 I 2 ·
UI~ MJ~ 1.00 1.00 ~.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 ~.00 ~.00 1,00 1.00
~ Mi, ~.00 1.00 1.00 ~.001.00 1.00 1.00L.00 1.00 Z.00 ~.00 Z.00
l~t Volt 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ Volt 4~1 ~8 ~06 SS 6~6 4 IS0 9S ~19 49
~ MJ~ 1.0O 1.00 1.00 X.001.00 1.00 1.0O1.00 1.00 ~.00
~r Mil 1.00 1.00 ~.00 1.001,00 !.00 ~.00~.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00 ~.00
f~l VO~. s 4~ 2611 206 SS 6~6 4 IS0 .S 289 49 02 S2
............ I ............... Il ............... II ............... II ...............
~t/~: 1000 ~800 ~800 ~800 ~100 ~100 1800 ~100 ~100 Il00 ~100 ~100
MJHM~t 0.9~ ~.04 ~.00 0.97 Z.04 Z.00 0.90 Z.00 0.97
............ I ............... I1 ............... II ............... II ...............
~l/h~J 0.~7 0.49 0.49 0.03 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.0~ 0.11 0,02 0.07 0,07
~tm T~M: 7S.2 03.4 S3.4 7.0 2S.3 2S.3 13.~ 13.3 11.4 ~4.3 1i.3 14.3
Vol~/Capt 0.S0 0.73 0.73 0.63 0.S0 0.S0 0.73 0,7] 0.17 0.ZS 0.73 0.73
~lay/Veh: If.0 12.0 ~2.0 SI.6 )9.S 39.S S2.1 S3.~ 8.1 43.6 SS.4 SS.4
~lay Mir 1.00 ~.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 !.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00
P~JFc~rt 1.0O 0.OS 0.8S 1.00 0.8S 0.8S 0.IS 0.IS 0.IS ~.00 0.85 0.IS
MJ~l/Veh: ~6.0 ~0.l 10.3 SI.6 33.6 33.6 44.3 44.3 6,9 43.6 47.1 47.~
t
Approeeht Iorth ~d South Bound hit Bound West Bound
............ I ............... 11 ............... Il ............... Il ............... I
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ................ I
User AdJt 1.00 1.00 l.ao 1.00 1.00 1.0o 1.0o 1,00 x.0o 1.oo l.O0 1.00
~ AdJt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0&- 1,00
Ited~ed Volf472 2646 103 SS Ils 3 ISS 06 180 47 03 S2
I'CB Mi: 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.O0 1.OO
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... II ............... I
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
Cmpmc~ity /malye/m Nodule:
aWdcqme~
t
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... ~
............ [ ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
............ I ............... II ............... I~ ............... ~1 ...............
............ I ............... I~ ............... ~ ............... II ...............
Capacity Anslygll Nodule:
lollme/C~p: 0.03 O.ll 0.11 0.39 0.20 0.20 0.89 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.11 0.91
t
Ai~proecht Borkh Bo~nd South Bound Balk Bound Welt Bound
............ I ............... Il ............... II ............... Il ............... I
IlJ. n. Greens 7 10 10 10 10 7 7 10 10 7 10 · 10
............ I ............... ~1 ............... II ...............
lolmne Nodulez :,) C~ullk Date~ 1! Oct: 2000
Bale Volt 23 2444 110 lq2 420 04 204 ]7 10 111 43 4`13
Grcnfth AdJ:1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.O0 1.00
lnitie~ Bier 23 0434 116 102 426 SI 204 37 10 131 43 443
Addmi Vol, 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
&TX: 0 · 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
znltiel rut, 23 3454 110 is2 426 si 204 37 14 131 43 463
User M:J: 1.o0 1.oo 1.oo 1.oo x.oo l.oo l.OO 1.oo 1.oo 1.00 1.oo 1,oo
Redl~t Volt , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R~duCed Volt23 243& 110 133 42`1 SI 200 37 11 131 43 403
~ Ad:J: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
Final Vol. ~ 23 345,1 11`1 1S2 424 50 204 37 11 131 43 463
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... Il ............... I
8at/l, ane: 1000 1000 ll00 1000 1000 "lB001000 leO0 1000 1000 1000 1100
AdJult~ent~ 0.07 1.04 1.00 0.04 1.05 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 ~.00 0.97
hues: 1.00 2.80 0.14 2.00 3.S0 0.S0 2.00 0.67 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00
rinel Sst.: 1730 S347 2S3 3130 `1`100 399 3IS0 1211 S80 1750 1900 1750
............ I ............... Il ............... II ............... II ............... I
Capacity J~ll~etl Nodule:
Vol/gat~ 0.01 0.4`1 0.4`1 0.05 0.0`1 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.07 0.02 0.20
Green TLue: 30.4 `14.863.8 10.0 43.4 43.4 0.0 10.0 10.0 24.3 25,3 35.2
VOId/Caps 0.05 0.86 0.8`10.38 0.18 0.18 0.8`1 0.370.37 0.37 0.11 0.90
Ocl~ylVeh: 35.0 20.5 2O.S 42.6 19.9 10.9 59.9 40.2 40.2 31.? 29.1 44.S
Del&y Ad:Jr 1.00 1.OO 1.00 1.o0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.o0 1.00
· rogAdJFctrt 1.00 0.S7 O.S7 1.00 0.42 0.42 L.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adjel/rib: 25.4 11.7 11.7 42.6 0.3 0.3 59.9 40.2 40.2 31.7 30.1 44.5
Deel~u~eue: 1 87 4 ! 11 3 13 2 2 7 2 23
t
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............
~h,~, 1.00 1.00 ~,00 ~.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00 ~.00 ~.00 1.00 ~.00
Initial Blot ~3 34S4 116 1S2 426 S8 304 37 lO ~31 43
Uger Mit 1.00 1.00!.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00 ~.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
............ I ............... Ii ...............Il ...............Ii ...............
............ I ............... JJ ...............Il ...............II ...............
~i~y ~lyste
~laylVeh~ 3S.9 31.S 31.S 43.0 20.1 20.1 S2.O 40.2 40.2 31.S 28.8
~1~ M~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00
Pr~JFctr~ 1.00 0.SO 0.S8 1.00 0.43 0.43 1,00 1.U0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MJ~llveh~ 2S.9 12.4 13.4 ~3.0 8.4 0.4 62.0 40.2 40.2 31.S 28.8
~g~e~ I 89 4 10 21 3 13 2 1 ~ 2
~M,I~v h,qm,d ~V
IId~lecIk~ #1 f 3:. Sleq~ll ~'. BI. & Ton~ &w ~ I~! 't3: St~lnl ~,4'. BL & Toff1 &v.
Ifltl~ec~m #t 1~ Steam Gr. Bt & TOmB Ay. Jn~fNCibl #11~. StfM~8 C~. Bt & T0flo Ay.
At~pro~ch~ 18or~h Bound 8ou~h Bound lest Bound wes~ Bound
............ I ............... II ...............II ...............II ...............I
Vollae 14odu~e ..
Reduc~ Vol~ ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0
~ M~f l. OO l.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 l. O0 1.0O 1.00 1.00 LOO
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... Ii ............... I
8~tuz&~i~e flo~ Noduler
L'apacit:F Analysis ~le,
............ I ...............II ...............II ............... II ...............I
............ I ...............II ...............II ............... II ...............I
Qrov~h Ad~t L00 1.00 1.00 L00 L00 1.00 Z.00 L00 1.00 2.00 1.00 L00
~ voZ, o o 24 o o o · o o 22 o o
ATIt 0 0 ~ 0 0 J 64 ~3~ 0 IS 40 7
Xnl~lal ~t, S1 0 72 0 0 t X17 ~72 SS 140 Iii4 iX
User Mi, L00 ~.00 t.00 1.001.00 0.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 L00 1.00
~ Mi: X.001.0O 1.00 1.001.00 0.00 1.001.00 1.0O 1.00 l.eO.1.0O
~ Vol~t SI 0 73 0 0 0 117 772 SS Il0 1114
e~t Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
l~uc~ vol, S1 0 72 0 0 0 117 772 SS 140 1114
f~ Mi: 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 0.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hbf ~J: l. OO l.O0 1.00 l. O0 1.00 O.O0 1.00l. O01.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
F~I Vol. z SI 0 72 0 0 0 117 772 SS 140 1114
............ I ...............Jl ...............Jl ............... Il ...............
8atura~ fl~
Sa~/Lnet lO00 leO0 1800 lO00 1000 1000 lO00 1000 1sO0 lO00 1800 1000
M~ue~t~ 0.00 1.06 0.97 0.~7 1.0~ O.J7 0.97 ~.04 1.00 0.97 1.04 1.00
b~elt 3.00 0.00 1.00 0.0O 0.00 1.00 1.00 3.79 0.21 1.00 2.04 0.16
............ I ............... Ii ............... Il ............... il ............... I ·
ca.city ~alyele ~le*
Oreu TIM: 7.0 0.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.7 61.0 ~1.0 33.0 7~.3 7~.3
~lay ~Jt 1.00 1.0O 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~J~l/Veht ~7.4 0.0 ZS.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.4 o.) 0.3 32.3 S.( S.6
~mL~eue, 3 0 J 0 0 0 S 22 2 S 2S 1
811Mle~ml 01 t4: Ste~ne I~'. Bi. A Blane~ Ay.
Ca~dC~ed~
btIBzecJ~ml # 114: ~w,~m C~'. I~. & Blaney Ay.
Approicb, I~rth Bound South ~ Bast ~ West ~d
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ...............
N~. ~e~ ? 10 10 ? 10 10 ? 10 10 ? 10
............ I ............... Il ...............11 ...............Il ...............
Vol~ ~le: >> ~t Date: 4 ~ 2000 ~<
hie Vol: 130 19S 152 S8 90 109 114 Sl3 20 14 1026
~h Mi: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
lnLtii~ Bee~ 130 198 IS2 SI ~0 109 114 SO] 20 84 102( 37
W~ Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~Z: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
lnitLul ~, 130 198 152 50 90 109 114 S8] 20 84 1026 37
Ueer MJ~ 1.0o1.00 1.o0 l. O0 1.oo l.OO l.oo1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0o 1.o0
~f ~J~ 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1,00 1.00 l. O01.00
~ VOI~ 130 198 IS2 SI 90 109 114 S83 20 84 1026 3~
l~Ct VOlt · · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I~C~ Volz 130 198 IS2 58 90 109 114 583 20 04 2026 37
~ ~]z 1.00~.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
f~al Vol., 130 lis ~82 SI ~0 109 114 58] 20 04 1026
............ I ............... Il ...............~1 ...............Jl ...............
8aturat/~ Flor
Bat/~e: lO00 18o0 lO00 1800 18o0 lO00 1900 lB00 1800 1000 ~800 1000
M~ultm~t 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.9? ~.00 1.00 0.9? 1.04 1.00 0.9~ 1.04 1.00
............ I ............... JJ ............... ii ............... II ...............
CaVity ~alysis ~le:
0.07 0.19 0.19 0.03 0.11 O.1l 0.07 0.11 0.11 O.OS 0.19 0.19
Vol~/Clpt 0.19 0.49 0.49 O.OI 0.20 0.2~ 0.49 0.33 0.23 O.gS 0.49 0.49
~laT ~: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 l. O0 1.001.00 1,00 1.00 1.00
P~ctr~ 1.00 0.8S 0.9S 1.00 0.8S O.IS 1.00 0.8S 0.85 1.00 O.SS O.8S
M~l/veh~ 16.S 16.S 16.S 1S.O 1~.7 14.7 34.9 11.7 11.7 5~.7 16.5 1~.5
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............I
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............I
VoI~ H~ule~
Capacity ~alyl/I ~ule:
~lay ~j: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.O0 l. OO 1.00 1.00 1.O0 1.00 1.00 1,00
C~yd~qmg, m
W I~ 14: 818mm ~. m & Blmmmmy Ay.
equine-m4
InleileC~ #114: S~ I~'. BL & Bimey Ay.
Appz~mchl earth Bmmd Beuth Bound Beat Bound lest Bound
Nave··ntt If - T * · b - T - · b - T - · L - T - R
............ I ............... Il ............... II ............... Il ............... I
Nan. Orm: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 l0
VOlUm Nodule,
Beme Vol, 330 lis IS3 SI 90 109 114 SI3 10 14 101J 37
gron~b MJ~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Inltim~ lie:130 195 153 SI 90 109 114 533 30 84 1026 37
Added Volx 0 I 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 4 ·
lniti·l Futz 130 157 154 73 53 123 131 iii 34 85 1072 43
Umer AdJ, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.003.00 1t00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHIP AdJ~ l. O0 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 l,OO
I~ Volume, 130 197 154 72 91 123 131 5Il 24 16 1073 43
Iodu~t Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ M:]z 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 !.00
NLF Ad~t 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 l. O01.00.1.00 1,00
9Jn~! vol.: 33d 157 Is4 73 53 132 131 iii 24 l$ 1073 43
............ I~ .............. Il ............... II ............... II ............... I
IIt~Z'itS. on 910V Mod~ll~
lit/alt ,~100 1000 Il00 Il00 1900 1100 la00 Il00 1800 1300 1300 1100
Ad~UlMt: 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.07 1.00 l.O0 0.07 1.04 1.00 0.97 1.04 1,00
Lin·at 1.O0 0.54 0.44 1.00 0.43 0.57 1.00 3.89 0.11 1.00 3.00 0.13
91nil lit, t 1750 1010 790 1790 779 10zl 1750 S410 189 XTS0 5390 311
............ I ............... Il .......... : .... Il ............... II ............... I
Voll0lt** 0,07 0.30 0.15 0.04 0.1~ 0.12 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.0S 0.30 0.10
·reen Tim: 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 14.1 52.0 52.0 7.0 42.9 42.0
Volume/capt 0.19 0.SI 0.S1 0.11 0.31 0.31 0.SI 0.27 0.37 0.77 0.SI 0.SI
Delmylveb~ 17.3 30.4 30.4 16.7 18.3 11.3 34.3 13.3 13.3 S4.7 19.6 19.4
Delay MJB 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. OO l. O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
I~gAdJ~ctr~ 1.00 0.05 0.IS 1.00 0.IS 0.IS !.00 0.IS 0.05 1.00 0.IS 0.IS
AdJDel/veht 17.3 17.3 17.3 14.7 10.S IS.S 34.3 11.3 11.3 S6.7 IS.7 14.7
IMmignQueue~ S I S 3 4 S 7 23 1 S 43 3
Approach: larch Bound South Bound Belt Bound Belt Bound
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... Il ............... I
#ill. ~reen: 7 lO 10 7 10 I0 7 10 10 7 10 10
Volume Nodulel
B~le Vol: 130 195 153 SI 50 10! 114 $83 20 l· 103S 37
Orovth AdJ: 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1o00 l. OO
Initial Os·: 130 195 IS2 SI 50 103 114 583 10 84 1026 37
Added Vol~ · 6 0 0 7 0 0 14 0 0 33 ·
Final VOl. z 130 202 154 73 59 123 131 699 24 86 1090
Saturation Flor Modullt
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... Il ............... I
LY~megtballtll:~odrk~esAv.&TOnoAv. la~raectl0~ 0110: Rodflgue~ Ay. & Tram Ay.
Approaeb~ ,Ioz'tb Bcmnd Booth Bound Iisi: Bound weet Bound
............ J ...............JJ ...............Il ...............IJ ...............
Orovl:hMJt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
lnitia~ Boe= 17 90 53 12 93 31 66 0! 30 63 177 46
Added Vol ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Inis*l&l futz 17 Il S3 13 03 31 66 8! 30 d:3177 46
leduct Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0
............ I ...............Il ...............Il ...............Il ...............
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............
Delay* hdJ: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAd~Del: 10.1 J.S 9.S lO.I
LOt ·
Kin. Oreeuz 0 0 O · o · o · o o o o
Volume Nodule t
~ Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ·
ATZt 1 I 0 · ~ 3~ 10 0 3 0 0 ·
Uler ~J~ 1.001.00 1.00 l.O01.00 1.00 l. OO l;O0 1.00 l. O0 l.O0 1.OO
~ MJ~ 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 l. O01.001.00 1.00
N VOIUM t lB J9 S3 12 94 61 76 88 33 63 177 46
Re~t Vol ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
l~uced Vol~ lO JJ S2 13 94 61 76 lO 32 S3 177 46
~F ~Jz 1,0o1.00 l.O0 1.001.00 l.O0 1.0o1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
M~ust~tf 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
ass, O.ll0.SI 0,31 0.110.it 1.00 1.000.73 0.27 l.OO0.79 0.21
r~al Sat., 62 340 112 63 4J6 633 546 440 163 SS9 496
CadenCy ~alys~e ~ule~
0.39 0.39 0.19 0,19 0.10 0.14 0.20 0.20 0.11 0.36 0.36
~lay ~Jz 1.001.OO 1.00 1.00 l.OO l. OO1.00 l. O01.o0 l.O0 1.00 1.00
MJ~l/Veh: 11.011.0 11.0 10.1 10.1 I.S 10.0 9.~ 9.~ 9.6 ll.l 11.1
~8 ~ ~e~ B B B B B A A A A A B B
~ac~Z ~ 11.0 J. S 9. v 10. l
~1~ ~J: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~8 ~ ~ B A A B
: ~,~,~ . .
kdmicim lltl ~11 Ay & Tone Ay
W #t 18: RmM~lel Ay. & Total Ay.
Approech~ IIorth Bound b$ ~ ~l~ ~ Weir Kd
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... Il ............... I
............ I'- ..............II ...............II ...............II ...............I
Vo~ ,~let
~b Mi: 1.00 ~.00 Z.00 Z.0Q 1.00 Z.00 1.00 ~.0o Z.00 ~.00 Z.00 1.00
~ ~1 s 0 0 1 0 ~ - 3 ~ 3 0 3 3 0
Initial ~e, lO t9 S4 X2 9S" 64 77 90 33 6S Zi0 46
User Mit 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00 2.00 l.O0 ~.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... II ............... I
~el: 0.10 0.SO o.]a o.xz o.. 1.oo x.oo 0.?l 0.iS 1.00 0.i0 0.20
............ I ...............Il ...............I~ ...............II ...........
~l~/Veh~ 11.~ ll.l 11.1 10.1 10.1 8.6 10.0 9.7 9.7 9.~ 1~.2 11.2
~1~ Mit ~.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00 ~.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00
MJ~l/Vehz 11.1 11.1 11.1 10.~ 10.1 8.6 lO.O 9.? 9.? 9.? ll.a 11.2
~c~1~ 11.1 9,s 9.i 1o.9
~liy Mi: 1.oo 1.oo 1.oo 1.oo
~M]~lz 11.1 9.s 9.0 lO.9
t
~ .** ~_ .*.
............ i ...............II ...............ii ...............ii ...............I
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II .........~ ..... I
Base voX~ 17 90 S3 13 ~2 ]1 66 81 30 S] 177
~ VOl: 0 I 13 0 li 7 6 11 0 19 13 0
............ I ...............II ...............Il ..............:ii ...............
---; ........ J ............... IJ ............... Il ............... 18 ............... I
cl~e~ty ~llysLg ~le:
~18y/V~ 11.8 11.1 11.0 10.i lO.6 o.O 10.3 Io.1 lO.1 lo.2 11.9
~lay MJ z 1.00 1. O0 I. O0 Z. O0
~: B A I B
~ :. : ':
Appzo&eh: UorO'b Bound South Bound b. st Bound West: Bound
Moveme~tz L - T - It L - T - · L - T - It b - T - U
............ I ............... I~ ...............II ...............II ...............I
voltage Hodule~ ):, Count: IMf:e: 11 Oct 2000
Bale VoX: 0 0 0 ii 0 i5 68 35 0 O 63 45
(J~o~cll AdJ: X.00 X.00 1.00 L00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Xnitia'- Bse: 0 0 0 46 0 6S 96 36 0 0 63 4S
Added volt 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ATIt p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial* Futz · 0 0 46 0 6S - 9036 0 0 93 45
User AdJt 1.00l.o0 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
~ AdJ* LO0 ~.00 LO0 L00 LO0 L00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
I~F Volumes 0 0 0 40 0 65 96 36 0 0 63 4S
eeduct VOl* 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
f4uel VoI . t 0 · · 46 0 SS 90 36 O · 63 45
Critical Oep nodule,
Capacity 8~:xhle,'
Cll~14Ct: Vol* Xxxz ~ ~ 346 XX2CX
revel Og service Nodule:
Approacht lortb Bound South ~ ~gt ~ ~oC ~d
Bags Vol: 0 0 0 46 0 SS 98 3~ 0 0 93 45
~Ov~h ~c L00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L00 1.00 ~.00 L00 ~.00 ~.00 ~.00
Md~ VoX: 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 ·
ATIt 0 0 0 0 0 6 13 0 0 0 0 0
user M~: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~ ~J: ' l. O0 1.00 1.00 l. O0 1.00 1,00 1.001.00 l. O01.00 1.00 1.00
~ VOXU~ ~ 0 0 0 46 0 7X 111 36 0 0 93 4S
R~ Volt O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
f~aX VOl.: 0 0 0 46 0 71 11X 36 0 · 93 45
Capacity ~ulet
~el Og Basics ~nle~
k14~liclon 0111:. F. ~l--S,~ I~'. & Ton1 Av .
b~e~e~ofl #110: PIClIal D~. & Toni Ay .
:' : *:
, Ilorth Bound 8outh Bound
L - T - · i.. T - ·
Vol·Il lodull z
Illl Vol ~ 0 0
Orov~h'MJt 1.00 1.00
bmod Vol, 0 0
ATIt ' . 0
InStil! Fu~t0 0
Ullr MBt 1.00 1.00
l~ MBt 1.00 1.00
I~ Volume I 0 0
Induct Vol= 0 ·
F/ua1 Vol. t 0 ·
Critical gnp Nodulet
lilt ;G=='1 Welt Bound
I, - T - ! L - T - ·
0 46 0 05 98 36 0 · 93 45
1.00 1.001.00 '1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
· 46 0~ SS 08 36 0 · J] 40
· 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 ·
0 0 · 4 13 · 0 · 0 0
0 46 0 74 lis 3i 0 · 93 4S
L00 1.00~.00 1.00 L00 1.00 L.00 L00 1.00 L00
1.00 1.001.00 ~.00 1.~ ~.00 L00 Z.001.00 L00
· 46 0 74 I~S 36 0 · 93 45
0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 ·
· 46 · 74 ~ 36 0 0 93 40
~itical ~ ..... ~ u~- 6.4~ 6.1 4.1~ -'-~- ~ ~ m
· ~l~im~--~-~ ~ ~ 3.9 ~ 3.3 3.3 ~ ~--~ ~ ~ ~
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
~ity ~{e: '
~ ~.= ~ ~ ~ SIT ~ 042 i4Sl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
............ { ............... Ii ...............l{ ...............i{ ...............I
~1 of ~lce
t
lppzolcbt lorth Bound ~th ~ lilt ~ kit k~
............ I ............... II ...............II ...............II ...............I
Vo~m ~e~
~ltical ~p ~le,
............ I ............... Il ...............II ...............II ...............I
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............Il ...............I
kdeaidJn ~120:. Beu~ Ay. & W Ay. kdena~on #120:. BM~ Ay. & ~del Ay.
t
,-- ,,:, .',:_ ' |
klM)M
Approaah~ north UomJd South Bound Init Bound walt Bound
~: w. _ T - · b - ? - · L - T - · L - T - ·
............ I ............... il ............... it ............... Il ............... I
Nh. Oree~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
trhiLL VOl. ~ 179 428 2 4 263 66 23? 2 4° I S 20
............ J ............... Il ............... Il ............... il ...............
ktUrlt~ma lrlov Nodale~
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
JklYpzM JIM! ~ 24.3 10. S 11.1 !. 2
LOS by Appr: C · B A
~ich: ~rth ~d ~th ~ ·alt ~ WaRt ~und
~: b - T - ! b - T - ! L - T - ! L - T -
............ I ............... il ............... Il ............... Il ............... I
Nh, Oreen~ 0 0 o o o o o o o o o o
............ I ............... Il ............... il ............... [I ............... I
voXw ~u~e:
............ J ............... Il ............... Il ............... Il ............... I
seturatl~ r~ ~2e:
............ I ............... IJ ............... Il ............... Il ............... I
capcity MaXyl~l
~J~lt 24.6 lo.s 11.2 9.2
~S ~ ~r ~ C I B X
Ai~roich: loztb Bould Blurb Bound ·lit Ikxmd lilt Bound
Ilol~llentt b - ? - R L - T - · ~- - T - · ~. - T - ·
............ I ............... II ...............II ...............II ...............
Nth. Green ~ 0 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0
Volume Nodule~
B~le Vol, l?S 411 2 4 163 66 127 1 48 i S 10
~th MJ~ ,.1.00 ~.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~ Vol s 3 0 0 0 0 I I O 2 0 · 0
~l z · 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~i~Jll h~t 171 431 3 4 167 67 138 I S0 I S 10
User mJ~ 1.oo 1.oo 1.00 1.oo 1.o0 '1.oo 1.oo 1.oo ~.oo 1.oo ~.oo 1.oo
~ ~J: l. O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
I~ ~1~ 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~M ~lt l?l 421 3 4 Ii? 67 130 I S0 I S 10
~ Mi* l. O0 l.O0 1.00 1.00l.O0 1.00 1.001.00 ~.00 1.001.00 1.00
~ ~J~ 1.001.00 1.00 l. O0 l. O01.00 1,001.00 l. O01.001.o0 1.00
P~ ~1. ~ l?d 421 ~ 4 167 67 128 I S0 8 S 10
............ I ............... Jl ............... Il ............... Il ...............
get.at/~ fl~
alit 0.3J 0.?0 0.01 0.03 O.10 O.~l 0.fl 0.01 O,~l O.3S 0.23 0.13
~bal ~t. t ~17 S~4 ~ 11 4~ ~91 409 3 160 lis XIS 331
............ J ............... Ii ............... Il ............... Jl
~lty ~alygLa
Tol/gac, 0.~3 0.63 o.83 0.35 0.39 0.~9 0.31 o.3~ O.~l 0.04 0.04 0.04
~lay/Veh, 3s.3 26.2 29.2 10.6 IO.S 10.6 ~1.3 11.3 11.2 9.3 ~.3 9.3
~lay Mi, 1.00 1.00 1.00 z.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
mJ~l/Veh, 2S.2 2s.2 2s.2 lO.i 10.i lo.I 11.2 11.2 11.2 9.3 9.3 9.3
~ D D D B B B I i B A A A
~eC~I 35.3 ~0.6 11.2 9.3
klly Mit 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~M~I z 2S.3 10.6 11.2 9.3
~* D B I X
Approlchs ~r~ ~d bth ~d ho~ ~ Ieee ~d
aln. Ore~, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · 0 · · · ·
Initial Jset 17S 410 2 4 163 66 127
~d VOlt 2i · 0 0 0 ? S 0 11 · · 0
ATZ~ 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Zn/~ial ~, 20~ 421 2 ( 167 73 133
Uler ~Jt 1.001.00 ~.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00 ~.00 I.o0
~ MJz 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 l. O01.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00 l. OO~00
~ VOX~ 201 421 3 4 1~7 73 133 I ~6 I S ~'~0
l~t VOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IWC~ VOl* 201 421 ] 4 167 73 133 I 66 O S 10
~f MJ~ 1.001.00 l. O01.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00l. O01.00
final VOX.: 201 431 2 4 167 73 133 I 6( I S 10
MJUl~m~t 1.001.00 ~.00 ~.00l.O0 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00!.00 1.00
L~eor 0.330.6? 0.01 0.030.66 0.J0 0.660.01 0.33 0.350.22 0.43
~city ~alysis N~le,
Vol/8a~z 0.17 0.~7 O.17 0.~? 0.37 0.37 0.350.3S 0.3S 0.04 0.04 0.04
~ ~Jt X.O0 ~.00 ~.00 ~.00 X.O0 2.00 1.001.00 ~.00 2.00 ~.00 ~.00
~S ~ ~: D D D I B B B B I A
~g ~ ~r ~ D B B A
bdmecUae 01~2: Ik~ng~ Hd. & IHm~ Ay.
IMm~al~n 052~ Bol~Oer Rd. & Blaney Ay.
t
~t: L - T - R L - ? - R b - T - I G - T - R
M~. ~ 7 lO 10 7 10 10 7 lO 10 7 10 lO
VOI~ ~lez )) ~ htez S ~t 2000 c~
~se Vol~ 67 03 7~ 230 211 S7 74 ~71 63 109 ~23 10~
~ ~1~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~J~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
hltlal ~t, S7 92 76 23o 211 s~ 74 67~ 63 ~00 s23
~er Mi: 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O01.00 1.00 1.00
m vol~: 67 82 76 330 311 S7 ?i 674 63 109 623 106
~t ~1~ 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ Volz 67 83 76 230 211 57 74 674 63 109 623
~ m~, 1.001.0a 1.00 1.001.00 l.a0 1.00 2.0e ~.oO 1.00 1.00
~ vol. t 6~ 13 76 230 211 S7 74 174 63 109 633
............ J ............... ]J ............... 0J ............... JJ ............... J
M~ 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.03 1.00 0.9~ 1.03 1.00
~Ht 0.30 0.36 0,34 1.00 0.79 0.31 1.00 1.02 0.lC 1.00 1.70 0.30
f~al la~., S21 438 591 1750 1417 383 1750 3383 316 1TS0 ~S2 538
~{ty ~al~Je ~ule:
0.13 0.23 0.23 0.~3 Q.15 O.IS 0.04 0.20 0.20 O.OG 0.20 0.20
~u ~ lo.s lO.S 18.5 lo.s 16.5 lI.S 7.0 24.8 24.8 7.7 2s.s 2s.s
~l~/Cap: 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.46 0.4i 0.36 0.49 0.48 0.49 0.46 0.45
~Fc~r~ o. Is o. Is o.ts 1.00 o.os o.os 1.00 o.os o.ss 1.00 0.85 o.Is
~si~eue, 2 2 2 s s · 3 14 I 3 13 2
t
Approacb~ Iforth ~d ~th ~d ~lt ~ ~st
~tt L - T - R b - T - ! L - T - R L - T -
X~. Ore~, 7 10 10 7 tO 20 · 10 10 7 ZO tO
............ ~ ............... I~ ............... II ............... Il ...............
VO~ ~ule:
I~ Volta 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ M~z 1.00 1.00 1.UO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0~ 1.00 1.00
............ J ............... {{ ...............{~ ...............~{ ...............
............ J ............... {~ ...............~{ ...............it ...............
~.,q, z-.~M .
kdmmd~n 0t~' Baln~r Rd. & Bkn~ Ay. ~ 912~ selngg Rd. & B~ney AY.
A~oeebt Iortb Bound 8o~th Bound Bait Bound Welt Bound
NOVelle~t z L * T - · L - T - · L - T - Jt b - T - P.
'- ........... I ...............Il ...............II ............:--II ............... I
Hilt. ~reen: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
............ 1 ...............JJ ...............II ...............II ...............I
Volume Nodulez
Bile Voit t? 83 76 230 311 S7 74 074 63 109 ~23 100
OzovtB AdJs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.O0 1.00 1.00
Initial Beet S? 81 ?S 2]0 211 S? 74 674 63 109 023 106
Added Volt 0 0 0 I 0 0 O I 0 0 3
ATIt 9 I 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 1
Initial ht~ s? O] ?s 211 211 S? ?4 676 63 109 02S 109
Ulir AdJz 1.001.00 1.00 !.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00!.00 1.00
~IW AdJl !.001.00 1.00 1.00!.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00
llW ~01Bt i? 01 70 231 lII S7 74 676 03 109 030 109
I~ Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · ' 0 0
lOB Ad~s 1.00.1.00 1.00 l.O01.00 1.00 1.001.00 L00 1.001.00 1.00
NLF Mit 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
Fhil Ye)., 0~ 03 76' 331 311 S? 74 076 63 100 620 109
............ I ...............il ...............JJ ...............IJ ...............
k~uzitioa ~lov Nodule,
Imt/l, inlt 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 2100 Il00 II00 1000 Xi00 1000 1000
' MJubmutl 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 !.00 0.97 1.03 !.00 0.97 1.05 1.00
MOll 0.30 0.17 0.3] 1.00 0.7! 0.21 1.00 1.02 0.10 1.00 1.69 0.31
rin-~ Set., 019 i4J SII 1750 l&l? 101 1700 310d lis 1700 3100
.......... ~'l ............... Ii ............... JJ ............... IJ ...............
Vol;h~t 0.13 0.13 0.13 O.13 0.1S 0.10 0.04 0.20 0.30 0.04 0.20 0.20
Delay AdJt 1.00 ~.90 1.00 !.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L00 1.00 1.00 z.00 1.00
AdJDel/veh, ~0.9 10.9 10.9 12.9 11.4 11.4 19.1 1.S I.S 19.0 0.1 9.1
.*' -'
~FUI-PaIeNIIM*kd, M
............ l .... u ..........Il ...............Ii ............... II ...............I
............ I ............... I1---~ ........... II ............... II .............. I
VollMe Nodull ~ -
ATI t 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 1
~f Mis 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O01.00 1.00 1.00 l.O0 LOO l. OO
· ~ M~t 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l..O0 1.00 1.00 l. O0
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I.
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............I
~J~l/veh: 10.9 10.9 10.~ 13.1 11.4 11.4 19.1 8.5 I.S 19.7 8.2 0.3
~l~e~ 2 2 2 ~ S 1 2 14 1 3 13
COMPARE 'l~u Jun 13 14:45:42 2002 Pa~ 1-1
City o( Cupertino
Town Center
PM Peak Hour
~,,,~.¥ Scenado ConTmdsofl Rel~xt (With Average Critical DeMy)
Future Volume AltemotJve
Plmse I PM P1mse 2 - PM
11t09 D~ ~ Blvd/l~qlnger Rd
11113 Slevens Ct. 61. & Torte Ay.
#~14 s~even~ ct. et. & ehmey Ay.
#118
~119 ~ ~. &T~Av,
· l~ ~ Ay. & ~ Ay.
· ~ ~.&~Av.
Existing PM
Avg
Avg Cdt
Del Cdt Del
LOS (sec) V/C (sec)
^ O.3 0.337 0.3
D+ 27.8 0.749 27.1
B 1 t .g 0.399 6.2
C- 24.9 0.797 30.1
C+ 15.8 0.628 23.4
B 8.5 0.3,11 9.5
C 19.7 0,646 21.6
B 10.3 0,340 10.3
A 9.9 0.000 9.9
C t6.4 0.743 t6.4
B 1t.2 0.684 11.4
Back~nd PM
A~,g
Avg Cdt
Del Cdt Del
LOS {sec) WC (sec)
A 0.3 0.347 0.3
D 29.6 0.9(~ 30.1
B- t3.9 0.477 10.3
D+ 27.6 0.650 32.9
C+ · 16.6 0.646 23.5
0 . 8.0 0.399 t0.0
C 20.5 0,666
B 10.7 0.359 10.7
B 10.5 0.000 t0.5
C t7.9 0.779 t7.9
O 1t.2 0.586 1t.4
Avg Avg
Avg Ccft Cdt Cdt
Del . Cdt V/C Dfd Del
L~ {sec:) V~ C.,tm~ I~sec) Cha~
A 0.3 0.347 + 0.000 0.3 4- 0.0
D 29.7 0.808 + 0.O92 30.2 + 0.1
' ~- ' t4.0 0.479 *,- 0.002 t0.4 + 0.1
~ 27,8 0.65t + 0.001 33.0 + 0.1
C+ 16.8 0.648 ~' 0.001 23.5 ~* 0.0
B ' 9.0 0.393 + 0,O90 10.0 + 0.0
C 20.6 0.GB6 + 0.002 22.3 ,'- 0.0
B t0.7 0.301 + 0.005 10.7 + 0.1
13 10.6 0.000 ,' 0.000 10.6 + 0.0
C 16.2 0.784 + 0.00~ t8.2 + 0.3
B 11.2 0.587 + 0.00 t 11.4 + 0.0
Avg
Avg
Dfd Cdt Old
V/C (aec)
A 3.0 0.3~t 2.2
D 30.0 0,92.3 30.8
~. t4.7 0.~93 t0.9
I~ 27.6 0.859 3,3.3
C+ 15.7 0.649 23.5
B 9.3 0.393 10.0
C ~0.7 0.696 22.4
B 11.5 0.399 11.5
B 10.6 O.OQO 10.6
C 20.3 0.81i9 20.3
B 1t.2 0.592 11,5
)
JIi~CIt: ·ortb Sound bth Iound lilt Bound Bell: Bound
Novemonlc: L - T - Jt I, - T - · L - T - · L - T = ·
............ J ............... Il ............... Il ............... II ...............
#in. Oree~ ~ 7 10 10 7 10 10 · 10 10 7 10
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... Il ...............
VOI~ Nodule~ ,:~ ~ount: Pat:e! 4 OCt: 3000 ,c,c
Bale Volt &Ii 736 216 432 1714 309 20I 791 144 330 707 182
Olro~h.MJt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
zuitA&l Beet400 734 230 433 1714 3J9 203 701 164 330 767 102
Added ~%t · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
· TI t · 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0
· %nitia% rut:t 400 736 236 433 1714 390 203 7Jl 164 335 767 102
Ueer MIt 1.001.00 %.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00%.00 1.00
~ AdJt 1.00%.00 %.00 1.00 %.00 %.00 1.001.00 1.00 2.00%.00 1.00
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... IJ ...............
MJue~ment:z 0.11 1.06 0.97 0.0· V.OS 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.97 0.04 1.00 1.00
............ J ............... Il ............... IJ ............... il ...............
CmimciCy %nalyele Nodule~
volume/Cape 0.Tq 0.45 0.32 0.45 0.75 0.70 0.76 0.70 0.14 0o7S 0.76 0.76
t
Approach, lorth Bound fo~th Bound Inet: Bound WeiC Bound
I~t:: v. . T - · b - T - · L - T - · L - T - ·
............ J ............... Il ............... l[ ............... Il ............... I
............ I ............... II ....... -. .......II ............... II ............... I
VolUme Nodule, .
Oro~:h AdJ, l. OO 1.00l. O0%,00 1.00 l.O0 l. O0 l. O0 l. O0l.O0 1.00 1.00
Initial Bee: 496 736 234 432 1714 399 203 701 164 335 767 102
Added Vols. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... II ............... J
............ I ............... II ............... II .............. :11 ............... I
Cnl)aCit:y An&lyele Hodu%es
IMIoF AdJr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Pz~gAdJrcCz~ 1.00 0.420.43 1.00 0.03 0.03 1.00 0.00 0.86 1,00 0.98 0.98
AdJOel/Veh.* 44.3 14.19.1 30.3 17.2 17.3 S4.0 44.0 18;7 S0.I 40.0 10.0
'-' ..~ ' ,:,
~ich: ~h ~ ~th ~d ~1~ ~ ~1~ ~d
~v~ L - T - I L - T - R b - T - ! ~ - T -
............ I ............... Si ............... IJ ............... Il ............... I
NLn. OEec: ? 10 10 ? 10 10 ? 10 10 7 lQ
~h M~ L00 L00 L00 1.00 1.00 L00 LO0 LO0 L00 ~.00 2.00
~ Vole 34 70 0 0 37 0 O O 31 0 0 0
Ueer ~J, 1.00 2.00 L00 1.00 1.00 L00 1.00 L00 L.00 L00 1.00 1.00
· ~ Mit l. OO LO0 1.00 l.O0 l. O0LOO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
R~u~ Vol ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ' 0 0 0
Beduc~ Volt 590 ~3~ 272 S03 1703 40~ 257 847 252 '393 843 222
~ ~J: 1.00 LOO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.O0 l. OOl.OO 1.00 LO0
~f ~J: 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O0 1.001.00 1.00 1.OO l. OOl. O0 1.00l. O0
· ~nal Vol. t Sg0 832 372 S03 1783 406 ~S7 147 252 393 843 222
............ I ............... il ............... JJ ............... JJ ...............
Sat~at/~ rl~ ~ule:
Slt/~e: Il00 ll00 lB00 lO00 IlO0 Il00 Il00 leOO lO00 Il00 1800 1100
MJul~t~ 0.lB 1.0S 0.97 0.il 1.0S ~.00 0.88 1.06 0.97 0.88 1.0S 1.00
L~es~ 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.23 0.77 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.35 0.SS
Fhal ga~.t 3150 S?00 1750 3150 6107 1391 3150 5700 l?SO 3150 4431 IlS?
............ I ............... 11 ............... JJ ............... IJ ............... I
CapacLty Wlyl/g
M/aedM I10~: DeAfln BId- & W A~t kimid~ 1107: De,AU B~d. & W Avl
App~ch~ llor~h Bound Ioui*h Bound hit Bound West* Bolmd
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............. :-II ............ ~--I
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
l~til~ Ill* 73 ltl 37 214 232J SS S] 34 ~ 10? ]S
~M ~1~ 0 O 0 · 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ M~8 1.00 1.00 L00 1.00 1.00 L00 L00 1.00 1.00 ~,00 L00 L00
~ Vo~z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · 0
vi.~ ~1.: 7~ 0s3 37 ~04 2220 ss s] 24 9 107 ]S 101
............ I ...............Il---= ...........Il ............... Jl ...............I
Approach~ Iorth Bound So. kb Bound Bait Bound Wel~' Bound
Hovesuent* t ~- - T - · b o T - · b - T - · L - T - It
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... Il ............... I
#Lit. Oriel t 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 l0 7 10 10
B~IO Volt 73 90'~ 37 104 2220 SS 03 1'4 0 107 tS 10l
grOvth. AdJz1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00*'t.00 1.001.00 1.001.00 1.00
lnitll! lilt73 IS3 37 Ill 1229 SS S] 24 0 lO? lS 101
Wed vol~ 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 0
IK~ AdJt 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
Saluter'ion 1~1o~ Nodulet
ClpaCitF Analyiil Nodult~
Pro(jAdJFctrz 1.00 0.IS 0.85 1.00 0.IS 0.85 't.00 0.i$O.iq 1.00 0.lis0.0S
AdJD~l/Veh~ 47.2. lJ.?l].i 29.'~ ?.4 ?.4 "aS.6 3].333.3 42.4 33.] 14.0
DeslgnOueUl~ 6 S? 2 12 SS 2 4 2 I I ] S
klil~ ile107: E~BI~. & RO41'~ Art, kdale~ 010T: DeArgl Ol~l. & ~ Av~.
... ,,., ', "-'.".',
t
~'oach~ Iortb ~ ~O~tb Bound lent II. and Ilellt I~ound A~ech= Ilortk ~ou~d So~tb Bound Bait Iound ~mk ~
'~' " ' ' ' " " - ' ' ' " ' ' ' " ~ ' ' ' " ~;._'?~..~.'. ." T ~ ~ T : _" T ; ." T :
............ ~ ............... ~1 ............... ~ ............... vi ............... e ---m- -: .... :-- -~- --~ .... :-- -me- --: .... z-..~- --z .... ;_.
#~. ~n~ 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 'mO #~. Ore~ 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
............ ~ ...............~S ...............IJ ...............Jl ...............J ............ J ...............J~ ...............JJ ...............fl ...............
Volume Nodulez Volume Hodulet
I~se Vol~ · 73 951 37 Iii0 1219 95 S5 24 9 107 55 10! I~se VoS: 75 55] 37 104 3220 55 51 34 ! 107 15
Gro~b .AdZe 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~rowth RdJs 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Wed vol~ 0 J I S 3 9 0 0 0 2 0 39 J~ded Vol~ 0 33 ? 21 40 0 0 0 0 1~ 0 S2
&Tis ? 104 0 39 106 I I S 0 19 $ 0 &?3* ? 104 0 39 105 I I S 0 19 5 0
U~ M~* 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00 1.00 User ~* 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.O0 1.O0
~ M~* 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 P~ M~t 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~ Vol~z 8o ~os9 38 228 2]38 56 s4 29 9 12o 4~ 123 ~Vol~ l0 1109 44 251 2375 S6 S4 20 0 142 41 160
~ M~t 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ M~ 1.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~F M~t 1.00 1.00 l.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ M~: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OO
............ I ...............Jl ...............Il ...............Jl ...............I ............ I ...............IJ ...............Il ...............II ...............
~t~at~ FI~ ~2e~ Sat~a~l~ FI~ ~le,
M~ct o. J7 1.siO.J7 0.97 1.04 1.o0 o. J7 1.oo1.o0 Q.97 1.06 O.J7 M~a~z O.J7 1.06 O.J7 O.J7 L.OI ~.00 0.97 1.00 ~.00 O.J7 1.05 0.97
~eo* 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.Jo 0.10 1.00 0.76 0.24 1.00 1.00 1.00 L~ee: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 ~.eO 0.10 1.00 0.76 Q.34 1.00 1.00
fhal glt.m 17S0 5700 1750 ~750 7324 17S 1750 1374 426 I?S0 1900 ~750 FL~ Sa~. = 1790 S700 1750 1750 7327 173 1750 1374 425 1750 IlO0 lTSO
............ I ...............iJ ...............Jl ...............11 ...............I ............ I ...............JJ ...............IJ ...............IJ ...............
~lty ~alylLl ~ule~ Capacity ~alyiig ~le~
~eu ~m~ 13.4 62.762.7 44.0 93.3 93.3 21.4 21.4 21.4 21.4 22.4 65.3 Ore~ Tim~ 12.0 60.4 60.4 44.S 92.0 02.0 23.0 23.0 2].0 23.0 2~.0
~I~/Cmpr 0.4f 0.410.OS 0.41 0.4l O.4f 0,20 0.14 0.14 0.48 0.24 0.2S Vo]w/Clps 0.49 0.45 0.0S 0.4S 0.49 0.49 0.29 0.13 0.13 0.49 0.13
~l~/veh, 47.3 20.0ls.S 20.1 I.I o.I 39.S 39.0 39.0 4293 39.1 ~6.3 ~lay/Veh~ 47.i 21.4 ~7.6 ~9.3 9.3 9.3 38.4 37.9 37.9 41.S 39.0
~lay MJ~ 1.00 1.001.00 L00 1.00 1.00 l.O0 1.00 ~.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ley ~, ~.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00 1.00
~JFctr~ 1.00 0.85.0.IS 1.00 0.IS 0.iS ~.00 0.IS 0.05 1.00 0.IS 0.eS P~JrcCr~ 1.00 0.OS 0.OS 1.00 0.is 0.iS 1.00 0.is 0.OS 1.00 O.IS 0.is
MJ~l/Veh~ 47.3 17.014.1 30.1 7.4 7.4 39.S 33.2 ]3.3 42.3 33.2 23.0 ~l/veh: 4?.0 1e.3 IS.0 39.3 7.9 ?.9 30.4 32.3 22.3 4LS 33.3
~ll~et g 48 2 1] 6i 2 4 2 I o 2 S ~i~eue~ i S2 2 14 69 3 4 2 1 9 3
~roae~ lot~h Braid ~o.t~ Bound gait Bound lelt Bound
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
#~n, ~l~ 7 I0 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
............ I ............... II ...............II ...............II ...............I
VOlI Nodulet ~*~* tout IMtn~ 30 Jan 3000 <~
Orm~h M~= 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.~0 1.00 '1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bee.'SII 13ii 33 140 331! 37 lis 73 47~ 101 100 23
AddId VOI~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 · 0 0
ATIt 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
User M~t 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O01.00 1.00 LO0 1,00 1.00 1.00
I M~f l. O0 1.001.00 l.O0 l. O03.00 1.00 l. O01.00 l.O0 l. O0l.O0
! VolIt III 136I 33 140 2319 )7 115 73 474 161 100 22
I~t Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IldmIod Volt IsiI 1300 3~t 144 3219 37 lis 73 474 161 100
l~I Mit 1.00 1.00 1.00 L00 z.o0 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00 t.00 1,00 1.00
RM'&IJt I.OQ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.O0 l. O0 1,00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol. s III 1369 33 114 221I 37 lis 73 474 161 100 22
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... II ............... I
I~t/~lI 1100 1100 IIOO 1100 1000 1100 . 2800 14001800 IlO0 1800 1400
M~utlIt, 0.I7 1.04 l.O0 0.07 1.04 1.00 O.ll 1.0O 0.07 0.II 1.00 1.00
Leone, · 1.00 2.930.07 1.00 3.93 0.07 1.23 0.77 1.00 3.00 0.I2 0.il
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... Il ............... I
CanAry ~ilylii ~le,
grIel TAlBOt 03.7 79.9 79.9 36.3 SI.S SII.S 10.0 10.0 63.7 fi.si 11.6 11.2
l~JAd~F¢trt 1.00 0.sis 0.0q 1.00 0.00 0.SIS O.Osi 0.siq 0.SIS 1.00 0.40
Approach: lorth ~ IO~l~h IOulJd ·air loliad Init Boltad
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... Il ............... I
Min. ~e~t 7 10 10 7. 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
I~:~t Vol~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
~ ~d~, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............I
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............I .
C)~ um leeel~ ~
Ai~zoicb, ~zth Bound South Bound lest Jound Weir Bound
.......... :-I ............... II ............... II ............... II ...............
Volume ~odule:
D~le Volt 534 1360 33 144 2211 37 115 73 474 162 100 23
~zo~ch ~d~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Zllitlll Ife~ 030 1349 33 144 2310 37 lis 73 474 161 100 32
JkSded Volt 0 · I O ] 0 I 0 0 S I 0
ATI~ 0 61 I1 43 ?S ? 4 11 0 13 13 47
Znittai tut,021 1434' IS 117 2396 44 120 I4 474 170 113 40
Uier M~f l.oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1o00 1.00l.oo 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
~ M~]: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
~ Volwmet S34 1·34 4S 117 2296 44 120 04 474 174 113
leduc~ Vol: 0 · 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IedUce~ Volt ]Ii 1434 4S 217 2296 44 120 44 474 174 113 · 69
~ Ad:J~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1,00 1.001.00 1.00
Ir~ll&l Vol. ~ S34 1434 4S 307 320S 44 120 44 474 170 113 69
fit/Line, Ii00 1100 1000 1000 1000 1000 11002000 1100 11001800 1000
AdJul~ient: 0.0? 1.04 1.00 0.07 1.0· 1.00 0.901.00 0.07 0.441.00 1.00
~ef: 1.00 3.91 0.0! 1.00 3.03 0.00 1.190.B1 1.00 3.000.02 0.34
FlnL~ ~t.: l?S0 S43! 170 1750 7350 141 20811442 17S0 31401111 483
............ ] ............... ii ............... Jl ............... ii ...............
Cop~l~y Au&lysLs Hodule:
vol/let: 0.31 0.26 0.26 0.11 0.]1 0.31 0.04 0.04 0.27 0.o4 0.10 0.10
~ree~ Tim: SO.] ?2.2 ?2.2 30.2 51.1 S1.1 10.0 10.0 60.3 14.6 16.4 16.6
Volume/elF: 0.05 0.41 0.51 0.91 0.04 0.iS 0.40 0.40 0.63 0.40 0.04 0.45
IWliy/veh.. 39.3 17.1 17.1 39.3 33.3 33.3 60.1 4O.2 24.0 44.6 04.4 44.0
DellF Ad~z 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ].00 1.00
PEogAd~Fctrz1.00 0.04 0.IS 1.00 0.05 0.44 0.oS 0.04 0.04 1.00 0.45 0.84
AdJlMl/Veh: 39.3 14.S 14.S 30.3 20.] 23~3 S1.3 S1.3 21.1 44.6 S4.! S4.9
Design0ueue, 29 si 3 13 12] 2 0 0 33 12 0 5
~dc~dm
mdnl ~V
t
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
....... , .... I ............... II ............. ~-II ............... ~1 ............... I
B~IO Vol~ ,l~ r/? 31! S01 2101 ~'7 18 i$ 1! 230 100
~h ~J~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LO0 1.00 1.00 1.00 LO0 1.00
~t ~1 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
............ J ............... Il ............... IJ ............... 11 ............... I
............ J ............... IJ ............... il ............... ii ............... I
~t L - T - R L - T - R L - T - B L - T .-
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... Il ............... I
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
~le VOIx 49 879 319 S91 2108 ~9 B4 ~6 29 320 IOO
0roKb MJ~ 1.00 1.00 LbO 1.00 1.0o 2.0o L00 L00 1.00 L0O ~.oo
Initial Beet . 49879 319 5J1 210O 99 lA 66 19 230 100 199
~ Vol~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ATE~ 0 60 0 ~3 74 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 4
Zni~ial ~, 49 94S 319 604 2182 07 Ii 66 2o 220 1oo 203
User Mit 1.oo1.oo 1.oo 1.oo 1.oo 1.of l.OO1.oo l.OO 1.oo1.oo 1.oo
~ Mi* 1.001.00 L00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 L00
~F VOI~s 49 945 319 604 2~02 s7 o~ 66 20 220 100 303
R~ voZ t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. · 0
' l~ VOlt 4J 94S 319 604 ~103 ~7 84 66 30 330 lOG 203
~ Mit 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O0l.O01.00 1.00 l. O0 1.00 1.00
· ~1 Vol. ~ . d994S 319 604 2102 ~ 97 94 ~6 30 220 100 203
M~uetm~: 0.~7l.OS 1.00 0.00 LO4 LO0 0.081.00 LO0 0.~7~.06
Fhil 8i~, ~ 17S04185 1413 31S0 7180 319 31501381 419 17S0lJ0O 17S0
Vol/faCt 0.030.33 0.33 0.19 0.30 0.30 0.030,05 0,OS 0.130.0S 0.13
VOI~/Cop~ 0.SS0.SS 0.tS 0.SS 0.SI 0.SI 0.240.~S 0.65 0.6S0,33
Delay MJ~ 1.001.00 l.O0 l.O0 1.00 l.aO l. O0 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
Pr~Jr~trt 1.000.4S 0.4S l.o0 0.42 0.42 1.00l.o0 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
MJ~l/Veh: SS.O13.3 13.2 33.7 S.J S.3 43.3S4.J 54.9 42.440.1
~8i~eve~ 4 SI 17 34 74 3 ~ s I 14 7
cladc~e~tm
APPL~ach: I~rth Bound 8outh Bound Bait Bound Walt Bound
Nov~Be~t* L - T - W L - T - ! L - T
............ [ ............... l[ ............... Ii ...............
Min. 9reen t 7 10 10 10 10 10 7 10 10 10 l0 10
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
Volume Nodule ~
sial vol* 40 877 310 S0X 3108 07 80 SS lS 22O 100 198
grm/th.AdJt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 X.00 1.00
Initial Diet 45 177 319 S~l 2108 97 14 66 19 230 100 15!
Added VoX, 0 3 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
&Tit . 0 60 0 13 74 0 · 0 I 0 0 · ·
Initial I~t: ·! 948 319 608 3117 07 84
User Ad:J, .1.o0l. O0l.o0 1.00 1.o0 l.o0 X.O0 l. OOl. O0l. O0 1.06l. O0
~ Ad:]: - 1.00 1.00 l. O01.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 X.00 1.00
J~F VOIuI~: 48 548 310 006 2107 97 8· 06 10 330 lO0 205
leduct Vol ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Weductd Volt 48 548 310 600 2157 97 84 08 20 230 100 205
P(3g AdJt 1.001.0O 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O01.00 1.00 1.00 L00
WLF Ad:J: 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 X.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol. tda 588 310 600 3187 97 84 40 20 230 100 205
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... J
· aturatiml Flo~ Nodule:
fit/Line: Ii00 Ii00 Ii00 Il00 Il00 ll00 1100 lO00 1000 1500 Ii00 ll00
AdJmstmmtJ 0.97 LOS 1.00 0.08 1.08 1.00 0.08 1.00 1.00 0.57 1.06 0.97
Idmalt 1.00 3.32 0.78 2.00 3.12 0.18 2.00 0.77 0.23 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final fit.: 1750 4100 1009 31S0 7181 318 3150 1381 418 1750 1900 1TS0
............ I ............... Il ............... II ............... Il ............... I
CepucitF Annlylia Nodule:
Vol/Sit: 0.03 0.33 0.23 0.19 0.30 0.30 0.03 0.0S 0.0S 0..13 0.0S0.12
~re~n TiBet ?.0 48.0 40.0 41.8 83.$ 83.S 15.4 10.3 10.3 27.1 22.1 63.0
VolBee/Clp, 0.88 0.6S 0.08 0.05 0.Il 0.Il 0.24 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.33 0.26
Delay/Tab: S5.0 29.6 29.6 33.7 12.S 12.5 43.3 SS.0 SS.0 42.S
Delay AdJ~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0o 1.00 1.00 1.00
ProgAdJFctr:1.00 0.45 0.49 1.00 0.02 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdJ~el/veh: SS.0 13.2 13.3 33.7 s.3 5.3 43.3 $5.0 SS.0 42.S 40.1 lO.0
Demi~nOueue: 4 St l? 35 7S 3 6 5 1
t
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... ~
Volume ~odule~
............ I ............... II ............... II .......... ~ .... II ............... I
blM(lec~fl ll113: 8llv~l C~ . BL & To~eAv .
c~d c~,,,ko
............ I ............... .Il ............... Il ............... II ....~ .......... I
~h.MJt 1.00 L00 L00 1.00 1.00 L00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~ Vo~t 0 · O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~X t 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Zuitlll ~t, S2 0 ti 0 0 0 137 12~t SO ~3 ~192 · 32
User Mi, 1.00 1.00 L00 z.00 l. OO O.00 L00 1.00 1.00 t.00 1.00 1.00
~ MJz 1.00 ~.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 l. O0 1.00 1.00 1.0O 1.00
~ VOl~: S3 0 98 0 0 0 ~37 ~2~J Si ~3 ~1~3 32
R~t Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ Mi, 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 0.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
~ M~, 1.091.00 1.00 l.O01.00 0.00 1.001.00 1.00 l. O0 1.00 1.00
............ I ............... Il .......... 3 ....J{ ............... JJ ............... J
Slt/L~et lO00 ll0O. lO00Il00 lO00 lB00 Il00 Il00 il00 1000 Il00 lO00
MJutmt, 0.11 1.06 0.9~ 0.97 1.06 0.9~ 0.9~ 1.04 1.00 0.97 1.04 1.00
~l~ 3.00 O.O0 1.00 0.00 0.00 L00 1.00 ~.8{ 0.l{ ~.00 ~.93 0.01
f~l hr. I 31S0 0 17S0 · · 17S0' 17{0 SJS~ 143 l~S0 S4S3 146
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... Il ............... I
~ T~: ~.0 0.6 14.o o.0 0.0 0.0 24.i 87.0 BT.0 ~.o 6J.~ 69.3
Volm/~pt 0.2S 0.00 0.4& 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.3S 0.20 0.)0 0.04 0.35 O.3S
bl~/vehz 3~.4 0.0 34.s 0.0 0.0 0.0 2~.4 2.4 2.4 SS.I 7.4 T.4
~l~ ~J~ 1.00 l. O0l.O0 1.00 l. O0l. O01.00 l. OO1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O0
~JFctr~ 1.00 O.iS O.OS 1.00 O.IS O.IS 1.00 0.~5 O.IS 1.00 O.IS 0.8S
~J~I/V~ )7.4 0.0 29.S 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.4 2.1 2.1 6S.1 6.3 6.3
~l~e: 3 0 S 0 0 0 · 17 I 5 29 I
Inmecthlgt13: BImn8 Ct. BL & TmmAv.
Approach: Berth Bound South Bound hie ammd Welt Bound
............ I ............... Il ............... {I ............... Il ............... I
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II .............. I
led~ Vols 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol~ S2 o 104 0 0 0 167 136S SI lis 13S7 37
l~g Ad,Is ' 1.00 1.00 l. O0l.O01.00 0.00 1.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
': .......... I ...... " ........ Il ............... Il ............... Il ............... I
Wet~e~'{~ Flo~ Nodule,
Lanes, 2,00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.87 0.13 L00 2.92 0.06
............ I ............... Il ............... l{ ............... II ............... I
Cipaoil'F Aomlyfil Nodules
Inim~Makm #11& Stmenl Gr' . BL & TmmAv . fntefleGtlofl II t3: Stevem ~r. BL & Ton~ Ay.
Silt Bound Welt Bound
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ...............
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ...............
User Mit 1.00 1.00 l. O0 1.00 l. O0 0.00 l. O0 1.00 l. O0 l.O0 l. O0 'l.OO
lqJFAdJ: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.oo 1.00 1.oo
leduct Vol= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wed Vol: S2 0 108 0 0 0 167 1365 SI 117 1357 3?
i~B AdJ~ 1.00 l. O01.00 l.O0 1.00 0.00 1.00 l. O01.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PI~I~VoI.z 'S] 0 10l 0 0 0 167 135S SI 117 1357 3?
............ I ............... II ............... il ............... Ii ...............
MJUtlSen~: 0.il 1.05 0.9? 0.9? 1,06 0.~? 0.9? 1.04 1.00 0.9? 1.04 1.00
-' ........... I ............... II ............... II ............... II ...............
t
J~pro~ch: Bortb ~md 8ouCh Douod ~lt ~ lee~ ~d
~t: b - T - ! b - T * R b - T - ! L - T - R
Vol~ ~ule,
Bsse Volt S3 0 SJ 0 0 0 1]7 127S SO J3 1193
~b ~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1;00 1~00 1.00 1.00 1/00 1.00 1.00 L,OO
ATIt 0 0 6 0 0 13 30 96 0 33 16S S
Initial ~ S2 0 126 0 0 13 1(? 13~S Si 132 13S7 37
User ~Jz 1.o0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 o.oo 1.oo 1.00 1.o0 1.oo 1.oo I.oo
P~ ~t 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.O0 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~ VDlu~ S2 0 12g 0 0 0 167 136S 5l 133 1357
Xe~c~ Vol ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
R~C~ Vol, S2 0 126 · 0 0 1~? 136S SI 133 13S7
P~ MJ~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,O0 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00
NLF ~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 I.~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol.t S2 0 126 0 0 0 li? 13SS SI 132 lis?
............ I ............... il ............... Jl ............... JJ ...............
81t/~e~ 1100 lBO0 IlO0 llO0 lBO0 2900 leO0 lBO0 1100 1100 lBO0
~J~l~E~ O.II 1.OS O.J? O.J? 1.06 O.J? O.J~ 1.04 1.00 O.J? 1.04 1.00
buel~ 2,00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.0O 1.00 1.00 2.17 0.13 1.00 2.92 0.08
r~ll f~C. ~ 32S0 ·27S0 · 0~?S0 ZTS0 5371 338 1750 54S2 249
............ J ............... Ii ............... Jl ............... Jl ...............
Ce~ctty ~llysts ~ule~
~ll~ ~z 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Mj~l/veh: 3~.4 0.0 21.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.3 S.4 S.6 29.6 6.9 ~.9
Approacht Iori:h Bound South BoG-md mast: mound nest: Bound
Novement: t L - T - m L - T - R b - T - I I, - T - ·
............ J ............... JJ ............... Il ............... Jl ...............
#in. ~re4m ~ 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 l0
Volume Nodule: )) COunt DSo:St 4 Jan 3000 ((
Gzoqf~h MJj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Boot 77 IlS 10S 00 206 137 163 1200 110 103 1112 03
Added volt 0 0 ~ 0 0 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ATIt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 · 0
Inli:ial hi:, 77 IlS 106 96 206 127 163 1200 110 303 Il02 03
User AdJ~ 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
!~ MJJ l. O0 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.0o 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00
~ Volm~ 77 11! 100 08 m0S 127 163 1209 13l 3o3 1302 03
Ited~t vol* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ Volt 77 119 106 00 ~'06 1)7 16) 1309 110 303 1102 03
!~ M~z 1.001.00 1.00 l. O0 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00
NLF MJt 1.0O1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
9~nll Vol. t77 Il! 106 90 206 127 163 1200 II0 303 1303 03
eaturat/oo lb Nodule, ,
8ai:/Lan~et 1000 'm000 1000 10001000 1000 1000lO00 't000lO00 1000 1000
Ad)alL, lsat{ '0.F? 1.02 1.90 0.07&.00 1.00 0.071.04 L00 0.J7 1.04 1.00
Lanenz 1.00 0.30 0.62 1.000.62 0.30 1.002.73 0.20 1.00 2.10 0.20
91~ml Iai:. t 1730 (101112 17301114 61O 1730SI01 O90 1730 S336
Calcify mlynin Nodule:
0.04 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.19 0.10 0.09 0.2O 0.24 0.17 0.23 0.23
~ TiM~ )1.4 31.4 31.4 31.4 31.4 31.4 m0.3 40.2 40.2 29.4 49.3
Volm/cap~ 0.lO 0.St 0.S9 0.20 0.SS 0.SS 0.S0 0.SS 0.iS 0.iS 0.S0 0.S0
~)~/veb, 22.3 2s.m 3s.m 22.s 28.2 20.3 )1.7 22.6 22.4 20.3 16.6 16.6
~lay MIt 1.00 l.oo 1.00 l.oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 LOo 1.00 l.oo 1.00 1.00
~JFCCFr L00 0.15 0.IS 1.00 0.8S 0.lO 1.00 0.IS 0.85 1.00 0.IS
MJ~/V~: 33.3 22.0 22.0 22.S 24.0 24.0 31.7 19.2 ~m.2 29.3 ~4.1
Inlamedk~ 1114: Stawm Gr. BL & B~ Ay.
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ...............
#in. Groan ~ 7 l0 10 7 30 l0 7 10 10 q
............ I ............... Il ............... II ............... fi ...............
Volume Hodulo ~
Ozm~h AdJ, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial BlOt 77 lis lis 08 10O 117 163 1100 110 303 1181 83
Added Vol, 0 0 0 0 0 · 0 · · 0 0 ·
ATI~ 2 12 13 10 11 22 34 63 4 ! 1SS O
Inii:ial rut, 70 127 100 116 217 14! 1)7 1372 122 311 1337 00
Usnr AdJ, 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.001.001.00 1.001.001.00 1.00
~ AdJ~ 1.001.00 1.0O 1.001.00 l.O01.001.00 1.0O1.001.00 1.00
!~ VOI~I~{ 79 127 193 110 317 149 197 1273 122 m13 1)37 - 00
Itedu~t Voiz0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
meduced Vol,. ?t127 199 116 217 149 II7 1273 122 311 1337
I~B Adj.. 1.001.00 1.00 1.00l.o0 1.001.001.0O 1.001.00l.O0 1.00
I~F AdJ~ 1.001.0o 1.00 1.0O1.00 1.001.001.00 1.001.0o1.00 1.00
Final Vol. ~?! 127 130 116 217 14! 107 1372 121 311 1337 00
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ...............
eai:/Ime: lO00 Il00 1000 1000 1000 1100 Il00 1o00 1100 lo00 1100 210o
1.00 0.3~, 0.61 !.00 0.0~ 0.41 l.o0 2.73 O.~? 1.00 2.O0 0.20
rina~ Ust.,' 1750 701 1000 17S0 1007 733 1TS0 SI0! 4~0 1700 5246 352
............ I ............... Il ............... II ............... Il ...............
t
Ag~eh, S~or~b Bound 8onth Bound Bait Bound Weg~ ~
~t~ ~ - T - ! L - T - I L - T - R L - T
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... II ....... = .......
............ t ............... II ............... Ii ............... I~ ...............
VOI~
l~le Volt 7~ lis 186 95 20~ 127 163 1209 118 303 1183
~h M~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.O0
~M {sit 0 I 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 ·
............ { ............... {{ ............... {{ ............... {J ...............
............ { ............... }} ............... {{ ............... it ...............
~ity ~alysis
t
Approach: Boz~h Bound South Bound Boat ~ Wee~ ~d
M~: b - T - k L - T - ! L - T - R ~ - T
............ J ............... Il ............... Il ............... If ............... J
HiU. ~e~: ~ 10 10 7 lO lO 7 lO lO 7 10 ' lo
............ ~ ............... Il ............... II ............... Il ............... I
Bege Vol~ 77 115 196 9~ 206 13V 163 1209 118 303 12B2
Gg~h ~]~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~ VOI~ 0 7 0 · ~ , 0 · 32 0 0 17 0
ATIt ~ 12 13 10 11 2~ 34 63 4 O 1SS
Zni~ial ~, 79 134 199 116 225 l~O Ii71294 ~22 3111354
User M~t 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
~F ~: 1.001.00 1.00 1.00l.OO 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
P~ Volu~ 79 134 19~ 116 226 149 197 1294 12~ 311 13~4
R~ VoI~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~CM Volt 79 13~ 199 lis 225 149 197 129~ 122 ~ 13S4 90
~ Mi, 1.001.00 1.00 l. O0 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
~ ~, 1.001.o0 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.o0 1.001.0o 1.00
ff~aX Vol.~ 79 134 XJ9 116 226 149 197 1294 122 311 1354 90
............ J .............. ~JJ ............... II ............... IJ ...............
8a~uga~A~ Fl~ ~le:
Sit/~et lBO0 1800 IlO0 1800 1800 IlO0 lO00 1800 1800 1800 ll00 lO00
MJugt~tt 0.97 1.00 ~.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.04 1.00 0.97 1.0~ 1.00
Lneg~ 1.00 0.~0 0.60 1.00 0.60 0.40 1.00 2.73 0.27 1.00 2.el
F~al Sat., 1750 724 1076 17s0 lOSS 71s 1750 5117 482 1750 5251 349
............ I ............... JJ ............... IJ ............... Il ............... I
Ca.city ~alyeis ~le,
vol/~: 0.0S 0.19 0.1l 0.07 o.21 0.21 0.11 0.25 0.25 0.LO o.2e 0.26
~eu Ti~, 32.0 32.9 32.9 32.0 32.9 32.9 20.7 40.0 40.0 28.1 47.4 47.4
vol~/C~, 0.IS o.e2 o.52 0.22 0.70 0.TO 0.es o.,o o.7o o.v0 o.eo o.e0
~l~/Veh, 31.S 36.7 2i.7 22.0 2S.S 2e.e 33.2 23.4 23.4 31.4 16.6
~lay ~ 1.00 1.00 l.OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Pr~Fckr~ 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.85 1.00 O.OS
~]~l/Vehx 21.5 22,7 22.7 ~3.0 34.3 24.3 33.2 19.9 19.9 31.4 1S,8 15.6
Demign~eue, I 6 9 5 lO 7 10 54 S IS SO 9.
I~eclm ~$ I~: R~ Ay. & Ton~ Ay.
kllrl~&m #1t8: R~ Av. & Tan~ Ay.
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... II ............... I
Nil. ~n: 0 0 O · 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0
............ J ............... Il ............... lB ............... Il ............... J
~1~ ~le~ )) ~t hte~ 3 ~C 3000 (~
~e ~lr il 48 73 4~ 109 71 ~0 1~4 32 dS 104
~h MJ~ 1.00 l. O01.00 1.00 l. O01.00 l. O0 1.00l. O01.00 ~.00 1.00
~ ~l: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · · 0 · ·
~l t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 0
~itial hi, 41 40 73 46 101 71 30 176 33 40 104
User Mit 1.oo l.OO 1.oo l.oo 1.00 1.00 1.~ 1.oo 1.0o 1.oo 1.00 l.oo
~ Mit 1.0o 1.00 1.00 z.00 1.00 1.o0 ~.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.o0 1.00
~ Vol = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ Mi: 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.0D1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
~Y Mi: 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.0O1.00 1.00
· l~l VOl,: 41 48 73 46 10~ 71 30 1~6 ~ 40 104
MJUltmt: 1.001.0O 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
fl~l lit.: IS3 17J 361 179 397 666 S53 Sll 94 S40 530 61
............ I ............... J[ ............... Ii ............... Jl ...............
~l/ht: 0.31 0.37 0.37 0.26 0.~6 0.11 0.0S 0.34 0.34 0.08 0.30 0.30
~l~/Veh[ 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 20.6 8.4 9.3 Il.0 11.0 9.6 9.8 9.1
~1~ Mit 1.00 1.00 !.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00 1.00
MJ~I/V~ 10.g 10.6 10.6 10.6 10.6 8.4 9.3 11.0 11.0 9.6 J.I
~t B B B B B A A B B A A A
bliy ~Jz 1.00' 1.00 1.00 ~.00
Approach: lortb Bound South Bound Bait Bound Welt Bound
nih. Green: o o o 0 · o 0 o · 0 o o
Volum Wdule~
I~le Vol: 42 40 72 dS 102 ?l 30 170 12 40 104 13
GL'ow~h ·dj:1.001.00 l. O01.00 1.00 1,00 l.O01.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Init/il lilt 41 41 73 44 102 71 30 176 32 40
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0
&TX! 0 0 0 0 10 1! 46 0 S 0 0 0
5nitial hi: 47 . S4 72 46 112 90 74 17l 57 4S
Uler AdJt 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 l.e0 1.00
~ Ad~t 1.001.00 1.00 1,001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.O0 1.00
l~f Vol~uez 47 SI 73 44 113 00 74 . 17037 45
Induct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 0
· edged Vol: 47 S4 75 46 113 00 74 170 37 40
~ Ad:J: 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00
final Vol.: 47 S4 72 46 112 90 76 176 37 40 104 12
AdJultmnt: 1.001,00 1.00 X.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
L~llef** 0.270.31 0.42 0.290.?1 1.00 1.000.02 0.17 1.00 0.00 0.10
final Sat., ISV ltl 241 143 397 443 S42 400 104 S20
C~pocLty ~mlysLa Nodule;
0,30 0.30 0.30 0.28 0.38 0.14 0.14 0.36 0.36 0.09 0.20 0.20
Delay Ad:J= 1.001.00 l.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O01.00 1.00 1.00
GO8 by PIo~I:· · B · B · · B · A · ·
ApprolchDe I t Il. 3 l0.2 l I. O 10.0
Deln~, AdJ~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ap~rAdJDel: 11.2 10.2 11.0 10.0
LUFF by Appr~ · · · ·
c~; d Cupedno
InMrm:aoa #156: RoddOUm Ay. & TMm Ay.
t
,-- :. ~.. ;,
~t b - T - ! L - T - ! L - T - I b - T -
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ...............
O~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
Vo~t 0 ~ ] 0 0 ~ 3 2 0 3 3 ·
............ I~ .............. Il ..... .......... II ...............II ...............I
Sat.r 354 lO0 242 163 395 639 S38 49d 103 517 S08 57
............ I ............... It ............... Il ............... IJ ............... J
Ca.city ~alysil ~le:
~rMJ~l: 11.] lO.] 11.1
~~ B I B I
IMmle(:tfoa #110: RoddguM Av. · Toni Ay.
i )
· ql,,(,m.i ~,1
JllMilec~lml ~11~ F D~ & Toms Av
biM(Jeclbfl B119:. pOC/IIc~ Dr. & Title Ay.
--- ;. ; ':
MBdV~
Appt~aebt Birth Bc~md Iouth Bound lilt ·land lilt BOWId
Mol~mefitt L - T - ! L - T - · J- - T - u L - T - ·
Volume Nodulet)) (~ount Deto~ S lot 3000 4¢
Imfn,wd m
~ :, : *:
J~cbf .orth ~d ~tb Bound _ Bait B~ west Bound
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
Bags Volt 0 0 0
Oro~th AdJt 1.00 1.00 1.00
znLtiml Bolt · 0 0
Added Vol t O 0 0
ATZ~ · 0 0
User mis 1.001.0o 1.00
~ MJ~ l. O0 1.00 1.00
· ~ ~1~: 0 0 0
R~Ct Volt 0 0 0
final Vol. 80 0 o
~iticml ~p ~ulet
187 J5 Si 0 0 3~ 1!
Clpec/ty Nodule t
(:nfl/ct Volt ~ ~ ~ .... ' 414 x~uc 37 46 xxxx ~ x~cx xJ~x ~-~-
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
~vel 0f ~/ce
IS 0 187
1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
{S 0 187 95 58 0 0 27
0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
35 0 Il?
1.001.00 1.0O 1.0O 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0O 1.00
1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
3S 0 187
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
35 · 187
6,43uu~ 6.~ 4,1 ~ ~-----~m
name Volt 0 0 0
OrmK# AdJ: 1.00 1.00 1.00
lnitim~ alem0 0 0
Added Volt 0 0 0
ATIt . O 0 0
Initial fur,0 0 0
Uler MI! l,O0l,OO l. O0
flIFM~ 1.001.0O 1.00
~ Volume~ O O 0
Reduce Volt · 0 0
final Vol.~ 0 0 0
Critical a~pHodule:
Critic&l Op,----- m .....
BollO~JpTist~-.~! ~ ~---~- 3.5 XX~X 3.1 3.~ 2ucXX .......... XXXX ~
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
~lict VOI~ ~ ~ u.~ 3IS ~ 37 46 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
............ I ............... Jl ............... Il ............... Il ........ ~ ......
~c~1: { ~ .... ~- --~--
Ildmlec~lm #t 19:. Plcffic~ Of. & Taft1 Ay, Intmleclkxl ll It Pscr4m Dr. & Tram Ay.
t
~ :. : ':
Ai)S~'OICh, Irorth Bound ~kh ~d '
~t L * T - I b - T - ! L - T
............ I ............... Il ............... I1 ............... 11 ............... I
VoZ~ ~e:
VoX, 0 0 0 30 0 zl~ 90
~h Mi: X.00 ~,00 X.00 X.00 X.O0 1.00 ~.00 Z.00 ~.00 1.00 1.00 Z.00
lnitAaZ Bee, 0 0 0 30 0 117
~ Vol~ · 0 0 0 0 6 I 0 0 0 0 0
. 0 O O · · · 71 60 0 0 0 0 0
MJ~ ~.00 1.00 1.00 l. O0 X.00Z.00 1.00~.00 ~.00 ~.00~.00 ~.00
Mi: ~.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 ~.00 X.00~.00 2.00
Vo~m: 0 0 0 35 0 264
~ VoX: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
rh~ Vol., 0 0 0 39 0 264
~ltlctl ~:~--~ ~ ~--~ 6.4 ~ 6.~
~oll~m~--- ~ ~ 3.S ~ 3.3
............ I ............... Il ............... Jl ............... II ............... I
~-~g~::--I~-~-~lt-~-~--~g~,-I I ~-~-:::::ll~-::: :-~l
~l O~ ~Lce ~le=
~c~l: ~ ..... 10.6
Appzoach; IlorCb Bo~d South Bound lilt Bound Welt Bound
VOIlIB8 Mod~lle t
· ale vol: 0 0 0 35 0 187 95 S! 0 0 27 19
(~ov~h AdJ: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial use: 0 0 0 3S 0 lS7 0S SS 0 0 17 IS
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 · 0 0
ATX: 0 0 0 0 0 71 65 0 O O 0
Initial rut, 0 0 0 35 · IS0 ~62 SI · 0 27
User ~: 1.001.00 Z.00 z.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Z.O0 1.00
~ ~Jt 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00Z.00 1.0O 1.001.00 1.00
~ Vol~: 0 0 0 ~S 0 260 162 SI 0 0 27
I~uct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
ft~l Vol. t 0 0 0 ]S 0 260 .162 SI 0 0 27
............ J ............... Jl ............... it ............... Jl ...............
Cap~c/ty ~e~
C~dCMmd,u
Mllnedl~ 012~. I·lmy Ay. & RoddQuel Ay.
JflMfudJ~ #t20: BlIv, y Ay. & ~*A~,~q~a8 AY.
P~ l-II
App~211cht Jorth ~ ht1, IslEd lilt Bound weir Jound
............ I ............... II ....... : ....... II ...............II ...............
Nlll. Oroe~ t 0 · 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0
............ I ............... II ...............II ...............II ...............
Volume NoduXI~
lige ~ol~ It 232 S 17
Growth AdJz 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O01.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Zn:LJ. 4it Bll~ 4! 333 S 17 300 110 141 · 130 I 4 14
Added VoI~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 0
ATII 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 0
User AdJ, 1.oo 1.oo 1.oo 1.oo 1.oo 1.oo 1.os 1.oo l.oo 1.oo 1.oo 1.os
~ AdJt 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
i~ Volumz 40 233 S 17
Red~c~ VOIt 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ledueed Volt0! 133 0 17 ]00 116 141 4 135 I 4 10
PCB AdJt 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00
I1~ ·d~t l.O01.00 1.00 1.001.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.O0 1.00
flail Vol. ~ &J 233 S 17 500 116 148 · 135 I 4 14
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............
liturItlO~ flow Nodulet
MJlmL'mmll:~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.O0 1.00 1.00
0.17 0.51 0.02 0.03 0.74 0.33 0~52 0.01 0.47 0.31 O.IS 0.04
............ I ............... Il ...............Il ...............II ...............
Approecbl~l t 12.8 20.S 13.0 0.S
Nlay PalJt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprAdJ De I: 12. I 30. S 13. · ·. S
LOS b~ ~pr t ·
~- .,, ~ '1
............ I ............... II ............... ti ............... Il ............... I
Min. Ore~, 0 0 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 ·
............ [ ............... Il ............... Il ............... Ii ............... [
rolm
Base veil 49 233 S 17 380 lis 141 4 IJS I 4 14
Gr~b ~J, 1.00 1.00 L00 L00 1.00 1.00L00 L00 L00 2.00 L00 1.00
Initial Bier 49 233 S 17 310 lis 140 4 135 I 4
~ Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ATI~ · 2S 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Uler Mit l.o01.00 1.0O 1.00 l.O0 1.00 1,001.00
~ MJ~ 1.00~.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~f Volms 49 359 S 17 399 114 141 4 135 I
R~t Volt 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
!~ VOl: 49 359 S 17 ~99 116 iii 4 10S I 4 14
~MJr 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
~ M~: 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
............ I ...............Il ...............Il ...............Il ...............I
ael~ 0.16 0.83 O.Ol 0.03 O.7S 0.33 0.52 0.01 0.47 0.31 0.15 0.54
............ I ...............JJ ...............IJ ...............II ...............J
~lay/veh~ 13.6 13.613.6 JJ.J 32.9 32.9 13.0 13.8 13.0 9.7 9.7 9.7
~ey MJ~ L00 ~.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~B ~ ~z t I C B A
afmuc(fofl d~fz~: ~ims~ ~v. & Roddoues Ay' P'"'~ 1Pfd
~ d~'J20:, abram',Ay. & JamMp~m Ay.
iWVd:
Wovem~t: L - T - I ~ - T - ! L - T - ! L - T - I
Nh. ~re~t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... Il ............... I
Volume Hodule:
hie Volt 49 233 S 17. 310 116
~MJ: l. O0 l.O0l.O0 l.O0 l. O01.00 l. O0 l.O01.00 l.O0 l.O0 1.00
~ VO~t ) 0 0 0 O 3 I 0 3 0 0 0
X~w 0 26 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0
Zn/CLal ~t; Sa ~S~ S 17 JJ~ Ill
User Mi, l.o01.00 ~.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 l. OO1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~ Mi= 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
I~ Vol t · · 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ M~: 1.00l.O0 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O0l. O0
~ ~J~ 1.00l. O01.00 1.001.00 l. O0l. O0 1.001.00 1.o0 1.oo l.oo
............ I ............... il ............... II ............... I1: .............. I
~ul~: l. O0 1.00 1.00 l.~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00
afl~ 0.16 0.82 0.02 0.03 0.~s 0.23 0.52 0.01 0.47 0.31 O.lS 0.s4
rhal hr., 101 S04 X0 22 S09 1S0 294 0 2~3 lis ~3 2s4
~city ~alyain ~le:
0.SI 0.SI 0.SI 0.78 0.76 0.71 0.SI 0.SI 0.SI 0.06 0.06 0.06
~lay/Veh= 13.9 13.9 13.9 33.4 23.4 23.4 13.9 13.9 13.9 9.7 9.7 9.7
~1~ Mi: 1.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00 1.00 Z.O0 ~.00 l. OO1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MJ~Z/V~: 13.9 13.9 13,9 23.4 33.4 ~3.4 13.9 13.9 13.9 9.7 9.~ 9.7
~IC~I ~ 3J. 9 33. I 13.9 9 · 7
~l~ ~: 1.00 l. O0 ~.00 1.O0
~MJ~I: 13.9 23 · 4
~ ~ ~r, B C I A
t
ApprOlCh* ~or~h ~d ~th ~d Ill~ ~ ~ ~nd
~?~:---I-~--:--T--:--T-Ii-~--:--T--:--~-Ii-~--:--T--:--~-II-~--:--T--:--~-
Min. Ore~ o 0 0 0 o o o · o o o ·
............ J ............... II ............... Il ............... II ............... I
VoI~ H~u2e t
hie Vol: 49 233 5 l~ 380 ll6 148 4 13S I 4 14
~h ~J~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.O0
%nitimi mia: ti 233 S 17 380 116 141 4 13s I 4 14
~ Volt ~l 0 0 0 0 9 7 0 27 0 0 0
ATI ~ 0 26 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Uler ~J: 1.001.00 l.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O0 1.00 l.o0 1.001.00 l.o0
~ Mi: l. O0 1.00 1.00 l.O0 1.00 1.00 l. O0 1.00 1.00 l.O01.00 l.O0
'~ VOZU~: ~7 3S~ 5 17 399 12S %SS 4 163 I 4 14
R~ VO%z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I~C~ VO~I 77 2S9 S 1~ 399 12S ISS 4 162 I 4 34
~ ~J: 1.001.00 l. O01.00 1.00 l. O01.001.00 l. OO1.00l. O0l. O0
Flail Vol. r 17 2S9 · 5 l~ 399 125 155 4
............ I ...............JJ ...............II ...............Ii ...............J
ht~lti~ %1~ ~let
MJust~t~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
............ ] ............... Ii ............... II ...............
Capacity ~alywin
~lmy/Veht %S.6 IS.6 IS.G 36.7 2S.7 26.~ lS.4 15.4 15.4
~lmy~Js 1.00 2.o0 1.o0 1.00 1.o0 1.o0 1.0O 1.oo 1.o0 1.oo l.oo %.oo
~J~%/Veh: 15.1%S.S %s.i 2S.7 26.7 26.7 IS.4 1S,4 1s.4 10.0 2o.o lO.O
~S ~ ~e: C C C D D D C C C
~p~Ic~I: IS. G 2~. 7 1S. 4 lo. 0
~lay ~: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~ZMJ~%: 15 · 6 ~6.7 15.4 l0.0
~S ~ ~r: C D C A
IMmedlon g't22: BolMg~r IM. & Blmey Ay.
Approaeht Iortk Bound ~th ~ lae~ ~ Welt ~
~t L - T - ! L - T - ! L - T - ! b - T -
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
............ I ...............IJ ...............II ...............IJ ...............J
~h Mit 1,00 ~,00 Z,00 1,00 ~,00 Z,0O 1,00 1,00 Z,00 2,00 1,00 ~,00
~ ~1* 0 · · · 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0
A~t 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 ·
User Mit 1.0o %.0o t.0o 1.0o 1.00 1.00 1.oo 1.oo l.oo l.oo %.oo %.oo
~ ~Jt 1,0O ~,00 ~,00 l,O0 1,00 1,00 ~.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 ~,00 1,00
~t ~1 t 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ M~t 1,00 1,00 1,00 ~,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00
~ Mit l,OO 1,00 1,00 ~,00 1,00 1,00 l.O0 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... Jl ............... J
ht/~t lO00 1100 1100 llOO lO00 Il00 Il00 Il00 ll00 ~100 lO00
MJU~tt 0,l~ 0,J7 0,9~ 0,97 1,00 l,O0 0.97 1,03 ~.00 0,97 1,04 1.00
~elt O.1O 0,gl 0.31 1,00 0,S~ 0,13 1,00 1,03 0,17 1,00 I,S3 0,47
............ I ............... II ............... Ii ......... , ...... J
~l/~tt 0,3S 0,2S 0,2S 0.0S 0,07 0,07 0,03 0,X0 0,10 0;02 .0,3~ 0,23
~lm Time Sa,I 3~.1 22,0 33,0 22,l 32.1 7,0 ~6,6 16,6 ~L,6 2~,a 31,3
VoJm/capt 0.69 0,SS 0,6S 0,~3 0,29 O,t! 0.1~ 0.30 0,38 0,~0 0.6S 0.6S
~liy/Veb= 13.3 ~3,3 13,3 9,3 l,S I,S lO,2 13,4 ~3,4 ~S,~ 13,2 23,2
~lay Mi: 1.00 1.00 l. O01.00 l.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O0l. O0 l.O0l.O0
~Fctrs O.OS 0.9S 0.85 1.00 O.IS O.BS 1.00 O.B5 0.85 1.00 0.6S O.OS
MJ~l/Veht 11.3 11.3 11.3 ~.2 I,O 8.0 lO.2 11.4 11.4 1S.I 11.3
~li~e~ 3 S 3 2 3 I 1 9 I I IS 4
t
~.~ ~. ~.~
............ I ......... : ..... II ...............I1 ...............II ...............I
Mb. Ore~: ? 1o 1o ? ~o 1o ? to ~o ? ~o 1o
............ I ...............II ...............Il ............... II ...............
Vol~
Base Toll 79 31J 13S 84 73 S4 32 3SS 31 34 659 194
~h MJ~ 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 ~.00 1.00 ~,00 1,00 1,00 1,00
~ Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ATII 0 I 0 6 3 0 0 I 0 0 0 S
User Mit 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.0O 1,00 1,00 1,00 l,o0 l,OO 1,00 1,00 1,00
~r M~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L.O0 l.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~ Vol~ 99 220 13S ~0 76 S4 32 ]S6 Il 3~'~S9 199
l~t Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · · 0 0 0
l~ Volz 79 330 13S 90 76 S4 33 356 3~ 34 SSi 199
~ M~I J.O0 1.00 l.O0 1.00 l.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.O0 l. O0
~ ~J~ l.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.OO 1.00 l. O0 l. O0 1.00 1.00 l.O0 1.00
~nll VOl,: 79 220 135 ~0 76 S4 32 356
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... Il ............... I
............ I ............... il ............... JJ ...............
Vol/gatt 0,2S 0,25 0.2S 0.0S 0,07 0,07 0,02 0,10 0.10 0,02 0.23 0.al
Ore~ Tim* 32.7 22.7 22.7 22.~ 32,7 22.7 7.O 16.S 1~.6 11.6 2Z.3 21.~
Pr~Jrctr= 0,IS 0,IS 0,85 1,00 O,IS 0,IS ~,00 0.IS 0,IS 1.00 0,IS
Jmmecffon #t22: BoBq~' ~d. & IMmey ~v. b4smcUon #122: Balnger f~l & Bimey Av
· l,qd,,~d~Vd,4dds ~
A~promch, ISor~h Bound ~th ~d hit ~ Weot ~
............. I ....... : ....... II ............... Il ............... Il ............... I
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
............ I ............... Il ...............Il ...............Il ...............I
............ I ............... II ...............}1 ...............~1 ...............I
Wed ~16:27.'03 2002
CI~ of Cupedlno
T0~11 Center
AM Peek Hour
Future Vokxne ,Ntemeive
Nog De Anz. BIl,d~l~blg~ Roi
#tt3 81e~me Ct. BI. & Ton1 Ay.
Avg
Avg Cdl
D~ C~I Del
LOG (~ec) V/C (sec)
A 3.1 0,650 3.6
C- 23,8 0.836 26.3
C+ 16.9 0.673 14.3
C 19.2 0.789 18.8
D~' 25.8 0.970 27.0
F.,lq:~-~ed ~ PM
Avg
Avg Cdt
Del Oil Dd
LOS (sec) V~C (~ec)
A 2.9 0.409 2.1
D 32.0 0.888 34.t
B- 14.9 0.530 11.2
D 30.0 0.925 37.6
C+ 16.5 0.70t 24.9
2010AM
Avg Avg
Avg Cdt Crll Cltl
Dd Cdt V/~ DM DM
LOS (sec) V/C Change (sec) Change
A 32 0.681 + 0272 3.7 + 1.8
13+ "27.t 0.9tl + 0.025 31.3 -2.8
C 172 0.705 + 0.175 14.7 + 3.5
C 20.3 0.826 - 0.099 17.8 - 19.9
E+ 422 t.063 + 0.3~ 48.0 + 23,1
B 0.6 O.342 8.7
C t8.0 0.~8 t6.7
B 11.6 0.433 1t.5
B t0.8 0.000 10.8
D 30.7 0.962 30.7
B t0.5 0.524 10.6
B 0,4 0.42t 10.2 ·
C 21.5 0.750 . 23.5
B t2.1 0,440 t2.1
B 10.7 0.050 ' 10.7
O 27.0 0.910 27.0
B t t.7 0.641 t22
g,l 0,385 - 0.036 8.2 - 2.1
162 0.621 -0. t29 18.9 -4.?
1t.g 0,453 +0.013 tt.9 -0.2
11.0 0.005 + 0.000 11.0 + 0.2
39.6 1.0t3 +0. t02 30.8 + 12.6
10.0 0.533 - 0.t08 t0.1 - 2.2
~tOPM
Avg
Avg ~t
De~ Cdt DM
LOS (sec) V/C (sec)
A
D**
B-
E+
C
B
C
B
B
O
B
2.8 0.43O 2.0
39.2 0.962 4 t .9
14.9 0.56T tl.2
44.O 1.040 90.4
17.0 0.748 25.9
9,4 0.481 9.7
22.4 0.619 25:1
12.5 0,460 12.5
11.0 0.0~0 11.0
34.4' 0.977 34.4
122 0.678 t2.9
hda~oc~ofl f~t06: DO A~l BJvd~S~fl8 C~l~k B~I
A~)L~ICh: l~orth Bound 8outh Bound hit Bound Welt: Bound
............ I ............... II ......... ...... II ............... II ...............
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ...............
~lni) vol. z G2~ 30~4 2G0 344 ~6~ 237 32s so~ %42 2s4 740 2s3
............ I ............... Il ............... II ...............
8libation l~lov Kodulet
AdJuet~t~ 0.11%.0~ 0.;1 0.11 t. Oi 0.~? 0.11%.Q; 0.0? O.II ~.OS 1.00
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... I ...............
Capacity XnalyoLs Nodulet
ProgAd~Fctr** 1.00 O.SS 0.43 1.00 0.42 0.42
t
~-- ..~ . _,
Appzoacb~ ~rth ~d ~th ~d ~wt ~ ~et
~t ~ b - T - X b - T - R b - T - R b - T -
............ J ............... Il ............... II ............... II ...............
Nth. Gre~: 7 1o 10 7 1o 1o 7 1o 1o 7 lO 1o
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ...............
Vol~ ~ule~
hie Vol: 496 ~36 336 433 1714 3~ 253 V91 164 335
~h ~J% 1.0~ 1,09 1.0~ 1.0~ 1.08 1.0~ 1.0~ 1.01 1.08 1.0~ 1.0~ 1.08
%ni~ll BlOt 538 7J8 356 418 llSI i3) 274 8S7 170 363 831 197
Md~ Yoll 31 70 0 0 37 0 0 0 31 0 0 0
AT%t 60 22 36 69 30 6 I 56 S7 SI 76 36
%nit/a% ~, 633 8S0 292 S37 %J2S 439 276 913 266 421 907 233
user MJ~ 1.oo1.oo 1.00 1.00 l.oo 1.oo 1.oo1.oo 1.oo 1.o01.oo 1.o0
~ ~g 1.oo1.oo 1.oo l.oo 1.oo 1.oo 1.oo1.oo 1.oo 1.oo1.o0 1.oo
F~al ~C. ~ 31S0 S700 17S0 3150 S10S 1391 31S0S700 17S0 3IS044S3 114S
............ I ...............Il ...............[J ...............il ...............
CmpKity ~alysiw ~ule,
Ai~prO~Cb~ Igoz~h Bound 8onth Bound ·not* Bound Weot Bound
~Om8~t t L - T - · L - T - · L - T - It L - T - ·
Nih. ~etJt. 7 10 10 I 10 10 I 10 10
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............I
Volume
Bale Volt S3J 1841 200 200 501 217 2m? 02! 01 3lm 001 204
lie.-003 2062 220 330 006 203 333 050
Addod Volt 35 35 0 0 11 0 0 0 33 0 0 0
ATIt ~S SO 90 S3 24 40 l0 Ill 16 03 Irt SS
Inttinl l~t:641 2147 320 303 701 3il 203 $91 14S 260 907' 383
Uoor M~t 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.o0 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OO
I~ Ad~: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.O01.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~ volum~ 003 2141 320 302 ~0~ 201 343 S01 140 36! 901 383
Reducl' Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Be~ac~d Volt 643 3107 320 383 107 301 143 SJl 146 260 mo1 231
Jq:B MJt 1.0o 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~F Ad~.- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00
fllml Vol.: 642 2101 330 302 101 201 343 001 140 3(0 007 201
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... II ............... I
I~tl~e, 1100 11oo 1100 1100 1100 1100 Il00 1100 Il00 ll00 1100 1100
· 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.26 0.~0
Final Bat. t 3100 S100 1100 1100 S?00 l~S0 3lO0 S~00 1100 3100 0160 1333
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... Il ............... I
vollSmtt 0.20 o.mm 0.10 0.12 0.i2 0.17 0.11 0.10 o.ol 0.00 0.21 0.21
· rem~ Time,30.2 0m.6 61.1 10.0 29.s 26.s 14.3 23.3 sm.4 lm.l 30.0 10.0
VolmBe/c~p: 0.68 0.91 0.33 0.91 0.so 0.63 0.91 0.06 0.1~ 0.04 0.01 0.61
Delay/veb~ 39.3 39.4 10.3 Ss.o 20.6 mm.0 S1.0 33.9 12.1 16.1 41.0 41.0
~elay Ad~t 1~00 1.00 1.00 1.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00
l~'oo~d~Fctr.- 1.00 0.60 0.43 1.00 0.43 0.46 1.00 0.06 0.g6 1.00 0.99 0,90
Ad,Del/Yah: 29.3 I?.S 4.3 SS.6 13,S 14,0 S?,0 26.0 10.9 36.1 40.1 40.7
~,ignOueue, 31 03 10 23 31 IS 31 32 S iS 49 iS
&pp~oneht ·ort-h Bound ~th ~ ~lt ~ lee~ ~
............ I ............... Il ............... II ............... II ............... I
Nih. Ozeu: ? 10 1o ? 1o 1o ~ 1o 1o ? lO
............ J ...............Jj ...............JJ ...............JJ ...............J
Vol~ ~uXet
~ge Volt 496 736 236 ~32 1714 399 3S3791 ~S4 ]3S ~6~ 182
~ VoL~ 34 70 0 0 37 0 0 0 31 0 O 0
ATZt 61 37 60 94 47 il . 33 171 S? 111 238
Znltial ~t= SSI 931 324 S?l 3004 49S 30S10S7 373 4861097
~ Vol~t 651 931 324 S~I 2004 490 300lOS? ~73 4lO10~?'
l~uct Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0
I~K~ vol~ 6S1 ~31 321 S?l 3004 40S 30010S? 272 4161097 3?O
· ~1 Vol. ~ 601 931 324 S?I 2004 49s 30010s? 3?3 4861097 3?0
gat/L~et ll001100 lO00 Il00 1100 1100 ll001800 lO00 11001100 1100
buel~ 3.003.00 1.00 3.00 3,18 0.13 2.003.00 1.00 3.002.39 0.61
Flnnl ~t., 31S0S?0O 17s0 3100 6013 14IS 31005700 ITS0 31004493 ll0S
~lay/veh~ 60,330.0 31.1 33.~ 41.? 41,? ?i.3S6.4 32.3 6~.9SI.S
~Fetr* 1.000.43 0.43 1.00 0.63 0.J] 1.00~.00 0.l( 1.00l.oo
M~l/Vehz 60.2lS.0 0.2 33.1 26.2 26.2 ?1.3SS.2 ~9.2 60.9S1.3
~mi~me: 42 Ss IS 33 112 27 22 ?o 13 33 gl
M ~107: Oe~flz~ B0~d. & Rocktgue8 Ave~ Jflfm~ecf~fl #107: O~m] Bhd. & Rodflg~ A~.
Approach~ I~ortb Bound foutb Bound last Bound welt Bound
~-'--~--h~L--f--~--:..-~--:..:.,f..~..:.._~_L.:.~f_.~_:.._~_.:..:. f(..~..:.._~..;...~,
............ I ............... II ...............II ...............Il ...............
Volume Iqodule:
&TI: 2 S3 0 8 2? 0 0 2 0 30 1
UI~ Mit 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O01.00 1.00 1.00
~ MJ~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
............ I ............... II ...............II ...............If ...............
~urm~ ~1~ ~le:
Ca~l~y ~alyo~8
MliylVeh: 28.1 12.6 7.2 42.9 ll.O 11.9 74.0 S1.9 SI.9 53.3 49.S il.1
~FC~y~ 1.~0 ~.8S O.IS l.GG ~.8S 0.85 1.00 0.8S O*IS 1.00 0.8S
t
............ I ............... If ............... If ............... fl ...............
N~. Green: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 l0 10 7
............ I ............... II ............... IJ ............... II ............... I
Vol~ ~ule:
BaBe vol~ 7] 9S3 37 1~4 2239 SS 53 24 9 107 3S
~o~h ~J~ 1.08 1.00 1.08 1.0O 1.0o 1.0o 1.0~ 1.0~ 1.0~ 1.0~ 1.08 1.0o
R~c~ Volz 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~F ~t 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1'*00 1.00 1.00 1.00
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ...............
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............I
Capacity ~lyllO
C~dCq,,4n,
kdaraedio~ #107: De.tn BId. & Reddguel Aw.
J~proach, I[ortb Bound ~ouch Bound lilt Sound Welt Bound
Nov~t, L - T - u L . T - X L - T - · b - T - ·
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... II ...............
Min. ~reeu: ? 20 l0 ? 20 10 ? 10 10 ? 10 10
............ I ............... Il ............... II ............... II ...............
kle VOlt l0 0216 46 163 S66 21 97 40 16 36 S9
~altLa-~TR" 'h~Adj' 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.1~ 1.12 1.13 1,12 1.12 1.12
~ Vol, O 3S lO S7 S3 0 0 0 0 6 0
&Tit 2 IlS 0 I S2 0 0 3 0 30 ~ ·
~er Mi, ~.00 1.00 Z.00 1.00 1.00'2.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00 Z.00~.00 1.00
~ Mit 1.00 1.00 A.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~.001.00 1.00
W Volmt 93 2633 ?0 240 7~9 ~4 109 S? 1l 7~ 61
!~ Volt 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W~ VOI~ Il 3633 70 241 739 24 2O9 S? 2l 74 47 167
~ M~ 1.00 &.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00 ~.00 1.00 l.O0 1.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00
~ Mi: l.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O0 1.00 1.00
Final Vol., 93 2633 70 240 739 24 109 S? lO 76 67
............ I ............... IJ ............... I~ ............... Il ...............
lit/We, lO00 1100 1100 IlO0 1100 1100 ll00 lO00 1100 1100 1100 1100
MJ~Mt~ 0.97 1.06 0.97 0.~7 1.04 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 ~.06 0.9?
wel~ 1.00 3.00 ~.00 1.00 3.8? 0.13 1.00 0.?S 0.34 1.00 .~.001.00
Fbi kt.~ l?S0 S?00 I?S0 I?S0 7268 231 I?S0 1369 431 I?S0 1900
............ J ............... II ............... II ................ II ...............
~/ty ~alyo As
~l/8a~z O.0S 0.46 0.04 0,X4 0.10 0.10 0.04 0.0~ 0,04 0.04 0.04 0.10
~e~ T~M~ 40.1 90.3 90.3 2~.7 ~7.9 ~.9 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
~lm/Cipz 0.11 0.7~ 0.06 0.~30.le 0.lO 0.01 0.SI 0,SI 0.61 0.49 0.36
bl~/Veh, 21.4 13.9 7.0 44.6 ~1.~ 11.? ?l.i S2.5 S2.S S3.1 4~.~
hlmy Mit 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00 1.00
P~JP~r~ ~.00 0.BS 0.OS 1.00 0.6S 0.OS 1.00 0.OS 0.OS 1.00 0.eS 0.IS
MJ~I/Veh: 21.S 1~.0 S.9 44.4 9.9 ~.9 ?l.l 44.6 44.4 s3.l 42.4 26.9
hli~et 5 13 2 IS 24 I 8 4 I 6 S 10
AppFo~ch: Sorth Bound South Blued gilt Sound Welt Sound
Novementt L - T - It L - T - · L - T - · L . T - ·
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... Il
Nan. Greens ? 10 10 ? 10 10 ? 10 10 ? 10 10
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... Il ...............
· olta~ Nodule,
Bale Vol: 73 933 37 Ill 3229 SS S3 20 9 107 3S 101
Growth Ad'J:1.12 1.13 1.13 1.12 1.13 1.12 1.13 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.13 1.12
laitllL Ble: 12 1067 61 206 2496 62 S9 37 I0 120 39 121
&ided Vols 0 53 ? 20 40 0 0 0 0 16 0 S2
itl s ? 140 0 30 174 I I S 0 10 6 ·
l~m Adj, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ...............
AdJuatmentz 0.9? 1.06 0.9? 0.9? 1.04 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.~? 1.06 0.07
............ I ............... il ............... Il ............... Il ...............
Clpecit:~' Annlylil Modull~
Oree~t T~ne: 12.0 62.0 62.0 43.1 93.0 93.0 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 66.0
Novement c L - T - u, L - T - !
Bait Bound Melt ~d
L o T - · L - T - R
............ I ............... I1~ .............. Il ............... II ............... i
N4n. Oreeo: 7 1D 10 7 l0 10 7 l0 20 7 10 10
............ I ......... 7 ..... Il ............... Il ............... II ............... I
Volume Nodule:
Bait Voit 473 2971 101 44 627 4 XTI 93 109 46 OO 60
Ql~/th. AdJt1.01 1.08 1.01 1.08 i. Ol1.0! 1.08 1.00 1.08 1.00 1.08 i.0i
Inltt&i Bie,S12 2707 100 S0 600 4 15] 10i 205 50 l? 53
Added~olt 0 33 0 0 10 4 6 I 0 0 I 0
NLFAdJ~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... II ............... I
8eturmtioa ~lovNodule~
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... Il ............... I
CaplcityAnalylll W:x:lule~
volum/Cap: 0.SS 0.O0 0.0o 0°6? 0.$S 0.SS 0.i0 0.g0 0.19 0.16 o.00 0.10
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... i
Bin. ~reen: 7 10 10 7 lO 10 7 10 10 ? 10 10
Volume#odule~
Bale Vole S31 1369 33 164 2219 37 lis 73 474 lgl 100 22
GrovthAdJz 1.0! 1.0l 1.00 1.01 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.0! 1.06 1.08 1.00
Initial BeetSi3 1484 36 156 2(OS 60 12S 79 S14 ITS 10i 24
Added Volt 0 13 0 0 21 S 7 3 0 0 2 0 .
ATIt 0 57 11 43 73 7 4 Il 0 12 12 47
Initial FutzSi3 1554 47 109 2506 S2 136 92 S14 107 122 71
UwerMJ* 1.00 Leo 2.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 l.oo1.00 I.oo 1.00].oo 1.00
~ AdJ~ l. OO l.O01.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00X.O0 L.O0 l.O0l,OO l.O0
FHF Volumes S83 XSS4 47 1~5 3506 52 136 02 514 147 122 71
Reduct VoX: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0
Reduced Vol*563 ISSJ 47 1,9 2504 S2 134 03 S14 117 132 71
i~BAd~t i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 '
............ I ............... II ...............Il ...............Il ...............I
Capacity Analylil NoduXe: '
Delay Ad~: 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O0 1.00 l. OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ad~Del/veh: 47,3 14.7 14.7 ~9.1 31,] 31.3 60.3 60.3 23.2 45.2 65.4 65.4
Appzoaeh~ Uorth Bound Bough Bound hit Bound West Bound
Noyes·oct b - T - · b - T - I L - T - · L ~ T - l
Nih. ~lreea t ? 10 10 ? 10 l0 ? l0 10 ? 10 30
............ I ............... Il ............... I1 ............... II ............... I
Inlttel Beet S30 2110 113 $3 703 I 1Si 104 213 S3 00
Added Vol, 0 31 0 0 l0 4 6 1 0 0 I 0
,BT3~ 13.4 100 3 ! 73 0 I '~ 13 I I 4
............ I ............... IJ ............... il ............... II ............... I
Bltur·tioa Flor Jiodul·,
AdJUltllle~itt 0.iT 1.06 1.00 0.J? 1.04 1.00 0.il 1.00 O.J? 0.11 l. O0
............ J ............... Jl ...............IJ ...............II ...............I
#
~:---F~--:--~--:--~-t~-~--:--~--:--~-t~-~--:--T--:--~-~-~--:--~--:--~-
H~n. ~g~: 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 lO 7 10 10
Vol~ ~let
XnLt/al Bee,603 103] 37 161 2411 41 121 82 - S]I 110 111
WM volt 0 1~ o o 21 s ? 2 o · 2 o
ATIt 121 97 11 43 143 ? 4 IX S? 12 12 47
Xni~Xal htr 734 1643 48 204 2656 S] 140 90 S01 193 136
User Mit 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 J.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
~F ~Jt 1.001.00 1.00 L00 1.00 1.00 X.001.00 1.00 1.001.00
~F Velar 734 1643 48 204 2eSS S3 140 95 518 191 136 72
· ~t VOX t 0 O 0 O 0 0 . 0 0 0 · 0
I~ Volt 724 1643 4B 204 2SSS 53 140 IS 518 112 136
~ Mit 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
~f MJ~ 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
F~IX Vol.: 724 1643 41 304 2656 53 140 9S Sli 192 134
t
............ I ...............II ...............II ..............=11 ...............I
............ I ...............II ...............II ............... II ............... I
~ ~J: 1.00 %.00 %.00 %.00 %.00 1.00 %.00 %.00 1.00 %.00 %.00 %.00
............ I ...............II ...............if ...............il ...............
kt/~e~ ~lO0 IlO0 ~lO0 ~800 ~100 ~100 ~100 Ilo0 IlO0 2000 lO00 ~00
............ I ...............Ii ...............Ii ...............Jl ......... ~ .....
M~l/Veh, 35.9 17.9 17.~ 14.X 8.S i.S 79.3 iO.6 40.6 3~.6 28.6 56.3
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............
............ I ...............I~ ...............II ...............Il: ..............I
~ Jkdt, l. O0 1.00 l.O0 1.00 l.O0 1.00 1.0o 1.o0 1.00 l.O0 1.00 1.00
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............If ...............I
Ad~uitmen~ 0.~1 1.0S 1.00 0.88 1.04 1.00 0.ga 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.0~ 0.~7
capacity Analysis Nodule,
Ad]Del/Yah: 57.2 14.S 14.S 34.9 S.S S.S 43.4 Si.1 SO.l 44.3 40:4 18.2
-'/4 i.
t
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
Min. OzlJ 7 10 10 10 10 7 7 l0 10 7 10 10
VolII Hodul a ~r
Iaaa Volt 23 3&54 116 IS3 6'J6 S5 304 37 15 131 43 463
InitilI Jilt16 374I 330 170 4?? 65 330 41 30 147 40
I ~OlI 0 33 · 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0
ATZ~ . 5 l?I · 10 6I 0 0 0 0 0 0 64
Initial hot 26 2III Il0 II0 SIS IS 338 41 30 147 4I S83
Ir MOt 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 3.001.00 1.00
I! Mit 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.O0l. O01.00 1.001.00 X.00 1.001.00 1.00
Reduct voX: 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Volt 3i list 130 110 III 6s 338 41 30 147 41 II3
~CI MJI 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 X.00 X.00 1.00 X.00 1.00 1.00
I,F MJ~ 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 X*00 X.00 1.00 1.00
Final Vol. t 36 305! 130 II0 III 65 330 41 30 147 41 011
....... ~ .... I ............... Il ............... II ............... II ............... I
IitfI48a~ 3900 xloo II00 1800 1100 Il00 1000 Ii00 II00 Ii00 1100 ii00
L~nml~ 1.00 2.87 0.11 2.00 I.I6 0.44 3.00 0.6? 0.33 1.00 X.0O 1.00
ffinal bt. t l?S0 S364 335 3150 6713 ?86 3150 311I III X?S0 it00 l?S0
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... II ............... I
VoX/Sat: 0.01 0.SS 0.55 0.06 0.OI 0.0I 0.07 0.03 0.03 0.0I 0.03 0.33
green Timz 39.6 61.9 61.9 20.0 43.3 43.3I.l 10.0 10.0 36.1 2l.O
Volume/Cap, 0.05 1.07 1.07 0.69 0.23 0.231.07 0.41 0.41 0.1O 0.11 1.0S
Del~y/Veh: 26.3 Sl.l 51.3 65.6 30.9 30.9114.3 40.7 40.? I0.O 37.5 76.6
DIlly Ad~: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.0O 1.00 1.00 X.00 1.00
ffzogSd~fctrt 1.00 0.65 0.65 X.00 0.43 0.421.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
adJlMl/veh: 26.3 37.9 37.9 4S.6 6.0 l.O 114.3 40.? 40.7 30.8 2?.5 ?6.6
DeaignQueue t I 113 s Xl 24 ] 14 3 I I 3 29
kIMfsm:Oon #t 133 ~SMYMIO el'. BL & Ton~ Ay.
,-, I. : .1
~ #t133 Steq~fu Ct. gl & Toni Ay.
A~Cb~ Worth Bound O°uth Bound BESt Bound West Bound
NoTime~ z L - T - · *- - T - R b - T ~ It v. . ? _ ·
............ I ............... Il ............... II ............... Il ............... I
NJJI. O~ee~ t ? 0 10 0 0 0 ? l0 10 ? 10 10
............ I ............... II ............... il ............... il ............... I
Volume I~xlule ~
lnttial. Ilez ss 0 i2 0 0 0 s? 585 60 113 1154 s3
xdd~ Vol, 0 · 14 0 0 0 0 O 0 23 0 0
Znl~:lal hr: SS g ?? 0 0 ! 121 IlS 80 148 1304
User MJ~ l.o0 1.0O 1.00 1.0O 1.00 0.oo 1.001.00 1.00 1.oo 1.oo l.oo
1~ Ad~t 1.00 1.so 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0o 1.001.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00
I~tF Volume~ ss 0 ?? 0 0 0 131 025 60 143 1204 66
ledtt~l: Vo18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Ye], SS 0 ?? 0 0 0 321 125 ' 00 209 12o4
!%1 M:Jt ' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
NLF AdJ: 1.00 l. O0l,O0 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
!f~]~1 vol. t SS 0 77 0 0 0 121 025 60 140 1204 66
Saturation Flor ,o~le:
BE~ll4ne~ 1800 1000 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800 1800
JldJttgt~,le~ltz 0.86 1.06 0.97 0.07 1.06 0.97 0.97 1.04 1.00 0.97 1.04 1.00
Lanai.- 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.79 0.21 1.00 2.04
lPl~l BElt. t 3150 · I?S0 O 01750 1750 S222 3?7 1750 S311 389
CRIJ~Ct~y Annlysie Modular
t
Approecht IIor~h Bound South Bound
BEst Bmuxl Welt Bound
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... Il ...............
#In. Oreen.* ? 0 10 0 0 0 ? 10 10 ? 10 10
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... fl ...............
Volume #odulet
Bale VOl; 52 0 98 0 O 0 13'/ 12'/0 58 93 1192 32
Groafl:b Ad~r 1.08 1.00 2.08 1.OB 1.00 2.00 1.01 1.08 1.05 1.08 1.00 1.0l
Znittal list S6 0 100 0 0 0 245 1316 63 101 1392 35
Adds4 Volt 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0
3nitLal Fut~ 58 0 134 0 0 13 175 1470 6] 140 1453 40
User AdJ, 1.001.00 1.00 1.002.00 0.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
Pl~ Ad~ 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 0.00 1.001.00 1.OO 1.001.00 1,00
Induct V~l: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol:56 0 134 0 0 0 179 1470 63 160 1453 40
I~B AdJ~ 1.001.00 1.00 1.00l. O00.00 1.001.00 1.00 1,001.00 1.00
final Vol.~ S6 0 134 0 0 0 17914'/0 63 1401453 40
Se~lLane.- 11001800 lO00 lB001800 1800 10001100 lO00 10001000 1800
Ad]ultuent~ 0.881.08 0.97 0,971.06 0,87 0.071.04 1.00 0.971.0i 1.00
LSnelt 3.00O.00 l. O00.0O0.00 1.00 1.002.87 0.13 1.003.02 0.08
Final Sat.~ 31S00 1750 0 0 l?S0 l?S05370 230 ITS05451 149
Capacity Analysis
Vol/8et~ 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.10 0.37 0.27 0.00 0.27 0.2?
bdlflOCgm ~t$3: IllV~l (~ ..... BL & TOfllAv Jn~lec#on l$1~ SIrda8 C~ BL & TofllAv
............ ~ ............... J~ ............... IJ ............... II ...............
N~. ~t 7 · ~0 · · 0 7 X0 10 7 XO AO
............ J ............. ;-JJ ............... Il ............... Il ...............
~le Vo~t SX 0 57 · 0 0 S3 633 55 X03 X074 54
~b MBt 1.11 X.II X.X3.1.13 1.12 X.13 1.13 X.~3 il3 l.X3 1.13 1.13
hitia! Bee, S7 0 64 0 · 0 5J 70J il IlS 1203 i0
~ ~Xt · 0 14 · · 0 O 0 0 31 0 0
A~f . ' 0 · 31 0 0 9 id Ill 0 lO 311 7
Ueer MBt 1.00 1.00 1.00 X.00 X.OO 0.00 1.00 X.o0 X.0o X.00 1.00 1.00
~ ~Jt l.O0 l.oo 1.00 l. OO l. O0 o.00 l. O0 l. O0 l. O0l. O0 l.O0l. O0
~ ~l~t S7 0 ~ · · 0 1~3 ~JO 42 IS5 1414 67
R~t Volt · 0 0 0 · · 0 0 0 0 0 ·
~c~ volt S7 0 99 0 0 0 123 990 Sm xes 1414 47
~ MJ~ 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 0.00 LOO l. O01.00 l. O0 l. O0 1.00
~ Mit 1.00l.O0 l. O0l. O0 LeO 0.00 l. OO 1.00 l. O01.00 LO0 1.00
~ VoL t S7 0 ~9 · 0 0 123 ~0 62 ISS 1414 ~7
............ I ............... Jl ............... Il ............... Il ...............
ht/ael 11oo Il00 ll00 )o0o II00 lies 1100 1800 1100 1100 1100 11o0
MJu~mt~ 0.11 1.0s 0.9~ 0.97 1.06 0.97 o. J7 1.o4 1.00 0.97 L04 1.00
me., 2.00 0.00 L00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.02 0.18 L00
f~l 8a~. ~ 31S0 0 17S0 · 0 17S0 17S0 5272 338 1750 S34S 25S
. ' ........... I ............... Il ............... II ............... II ...............
VOI/~C: 0.0~ 0.00 0.0~ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.X~ 0.19 0.0~
~l~/Veh: ]~.S 0.0 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.7 9.1 9.~ 24.3 S.0 6.0
~Jf~trt 1.00 O.OS 0.15 1.00 0.8S 0.IS 1.00 0.85 0.8S 1.00 0.OS
~roachz ~rkh Kd b~ ~ lilt ~ gelt Bo~d
............ I ............... II ............... II ............ II ............
VoI~ ~ulet ·
~se vol: S2 0 98 o 0 0 137 1279 SI 03 1102
Znitial Beet SI 0 110 0 0 0 153 1432 SS 104 1335
~ Vol: 0 0 23 0 o 0 0 0 0 17 0 ~ 0
ATIt 0 0 lJ 0 0 13 30 246 · 43 406
~itial ~t, SI 0 14s 0 0 l] Ill 1678 65 164 1741
User Mi: l. O0 l.O0 1.0o 1.001.00 0.00 1.OO l. O0l. O01.00 1.00 1.00
~ MI% l. O0 l. O0l. O01.00l.O0 0.00 l. O0 l. O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O0
l~t VOl: -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 ·
l~ Volt SI · 14S · 0 0 113 1678 65 164 1741 41
f~ M~t 1.001.00 l. OOl.O0l.O0 0.00 1.00 l.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~ ~J* l. O0 l. OO1.00 l.O0l. O00.00 l.O0 l. O01.00 l.~O l.O0 l. O0
~JUO~tt 0.il1.0g 0*J~ 0*ill*0S O*J~ 0*97 l. OI1.00 O.J7 1.04 l.OO
F/ual gat. t 3IS0 0 17S0 0 0 1750 17S0 S3Jl 209 1750 5471
............ I ............... IJ ............... il ............... il
Capacity ~lyel8
0.02 0.00 o.oo 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.3~ 0.31 o.ot 0.32 0.32
all~ne~ 3 0 7 0 0 0 9 38 x I 41 I
A~ro&cht ·orth Bound bth ~ welt Bound Welt Bo~nd
Added ~oll 0 4 0 0 7 0 0 14 0 0 23 0
J~t VOI~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saturation rlo~ Nodule**
I~nel: 1,00 0.S? 0.43 1.00 0.45 0.55 1.00 2.90 0.10 1.00 2.89 0,Il
Capacity A~a/ylLe Nodule:
t
Moveaent; b - ? - · b - T - ! b - T - It L - ? - ·
Win. oreent 7 20 10 7 10 lO 7 lO 10 7 lO 10
........... =1 ............... II ............... II ............... Il ............... I
Vol~ ~ulex
~le Vol~ 77 lis 186 f8 206 1~7 163 1209 118 303 1182 82
~h M~ 1.08 1.0l 1.0l 1.0J 1.08 1.06 1.00 1.08 1,0O 1.08 1.0O
~ VOI~ 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 17 ·
ATX8 1 13 13 16 11 33 34 61 4 I 152
............ I ...............Il ...............Il ...............Ii ...............
............ I ...............Il ...............IJ ...............It ...............I
~,,~,--,-,~-, #1 '14: ~lvln~ Ct. BL & BIm~y ~v. Inlm~c0m~ #'1 '14: =~lv~l Ct. BL & BIIne~ Ay. line F~d
~v~t ~ ~ - T - R L - T - R L - T -
............ J ............... JJ ............... Il ............... Il ........ ~ ......
N~. ~t 7 10 10 7 ~0 20 7 ~0
............ I ............... Il ............... II ............... II ...............
Vo~ ~ulet
~b M]t 1.13 1.13 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.13 1.13 1.12 1.11 1.13 1.12 1.12
l~ltia.~ Bg~: 146 ~i0 170 65 101 1~ 1~8 6S3 22
User Mi, 1.00 L00 1.oo L00 LO0 1.00 1.00 L00 1.00 L00 1.00 1.00
~ ~Jz 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~ VOl~t 149 22S IS3 03 ~10 L3S 14S t31 ~6 99 138S 47
~t Volt 0 0 · 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0
~ Volt 149 ~3S 193 83 110 13S 14S 931
~MJr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~ ~J~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L00 1.00 1.00
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... II ...............
M~lM~t 0.97 l. O01.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.04 ~.00 0.J7 L04
~eOv 1.00 0,S4 0.46 1.00 0.4S 0.55 ~.00 3.91 0.0~ 1.00 3.90 0.10
Fbi1 ~. ~ 17S0 971 lSJ 17S0 807 J93 17S0 S44S 154 17S0 5414
............ I ............... Il ............... IJ ...... .........
~ACF ~aZyele ~Xe:
Vol/ga~, 0.oo 0.23 0.33 0.0s 0.14 0.~4 0.08 0.17 0.17 0.0J 0.2s 0.36
bm TAM, 41.1 dl.1 41.1 41.1 41.1 41.1 14.6 S2.9 S3.9 7.0 4S.3 45.3
Vol~/~pr 0.23 0.42 0.SI 0.13 0.36 0.36 0.il 0.36 0.36 0.89 0.63 0.S2
bley/Veh~ ll.O 22.4 32.6 17.3 XJ.2 19.3 37.8 13.6 ~3.6 ~S.0 19.8 19.0
~lay M~z 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
P~JFcbEv 1.00 0.9S 0.OS 1.00 O.BS 0.OS 1.00 O.8S 0.85
~J~l/Veh~ XO.0 19.~ 19.~ 17.3 16.3 ~6.3 37.8 11,4
hellene, 6 9 8 2 4 S I 31 I 6 53
Approach, forth Bound ~on~h Bound BII~ ~ ~BC ~d
~ t L - T - R L - T - I L - T - ! L - T
............ I ............... Il ............... II ............... II ............... I
Min. Ore~s 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
............ J ............... Il ............... Il ............... Il ....... " ...... J
Vol~
bee Vol, 77 11S 186 98 20i 127 163 1209 118 303 1182
m~h M~S 1.12 1.13 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.13 1.12 1.13 1.12 1.13 1.13 1.12
~ Vol, 0 7 0 0 S 0 0 32 0 0 IV 0
User Mi, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. O01.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~ MJz l. OO 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1~ 1,o0
l~uet Volt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · ·
l~ VoLt 87 140 338 132 ~Sl 164 317 1606 136 368 17SI
P~ M~t 1,001.00 1.00,1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
~r M~, 1.001.00 1.oo 1.0o l.O0 1.o0 1.00 1.0o 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
P~l Vol.t 07 140 ~28 133 ~S1 164 ~17 1~06 13~ 3~9 17S~ 106
............ J ............... II ............... lJ ............... IJ ...............
8at~at/~ rl~ ~1~,
Sit/Loci Il00 lO00 1100 1800 Il00 ll00 lO00 lO00 lO00 IlO0 1800 Il00
~JUO~C~ 0.J7 1,00 1.00 0.97 ~.00 1.00 0.97 1.04 L00 0.97 1.04 1.00
~ee, 1.00 0.39 0.61 1.00 0.60 0.40 1.00 ~,76 0.24 1.00 ~.g3 0.18
Final 8a~.: ~7S0 70~ 1093 ~7S0 10Il ~13 lVS0 SIS2 430 17S0 5202 310
............ J ............... JJ ............... JJ ............... JJ ............... I
~cL~y ~alysls
Vol/81~; 0.0S 0.21 0.2~ 0.0l 0.23 0.23 0.13 0.31 0.31 0.31 0,3~
~eu TJt~ IL0 ]1.0 3L0 31,0 3~,6 ]~.0 ~J,0 IL1 4~.1 31,] SI.I SI,i
~2ly/Vehz 32.~ 3L3 31.3 33,4 3S.3 3S.3 31,1 2S.2 2S.3 J~.l ll.~ 11.~
~lly ~f L00 L00 ~.~0 ~.00 L00 LO0 1.~0 LO0 L00 L00 ~.00 ~.0~
· =~Fc~r= L00 0.IS 0,IS LO0 0.IS 0.IS ~.00 0.IS 0.IS L00 0.IS 0.Is
kI(ll:Ull 0110: RolldgulI Ay. · Total Ay.
Iniersectm #1t8: Rodd0ues,Av. ,t Tram Ay.
go,**
--,,. .: ,,,:... '
Approach: ··rrb Bound 8~uth Bound Bait Bound ·est Bound
Movement, L - T - · b - T - · L - T - ! L - T - ·
............ I--: ............ II ............... Il ............... Il ...............
#in. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
............ J ............... Jl ...............Il ...............il ...............
Volume J~dule:
· eno vol~ 17 90 91 12 92 ll 06 ' 06 30 ·3 177 46
GTo~cb Mi: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1o00 1.00
xnttin,l use, 10 106 S7 13 100 16 72 00 33 60 192 S0
Added Volt 0 0 II 0 16 7 6 11 0 10 13 0
JLTZt 1 I 0 0 2 30 10 0 2 0 0 0
Zoitisl rut,10 13s 70 1· Ill 71 66 106 3· ·? Sos ··
Uenz AdJ: 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
~ AdJ! 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
lq~ Volumes 10 lis 70 13 110 71 00 106 35 97 209 S0
~educC Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol** 10 135 70 13 110 71 60 106 3· 07 205 ·0
PCB AdJs 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.003.00 1.O0 1.001.00 1.00
NLf Mit 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001,00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
f~nel Vol. ~ 19 lis 70 13 119 71 00 106 35 07 205 SO
............ I ...............II ...............Ii ...............JJ ...............
hturstLen flo~ Nodulet
Ad~en~me~tr 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 !.0· 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0· 1.00
Lmtes~ 0~09 0.57 0.30 0.lO 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.76 0.20 1.00 0.00 0.20
fi·el Set. tS2 311 100 S2 475 S·I S14 430 130 533 474 11·
............ I-, .............. Ii ...............Jl ...............Jl ...............
Vol/bt, 0.27 0.37 0.37 0.25 0.2· 0.12 0.17 0.25 0.25 0.16 0,43 0.43
IMlay/veb: 12.S 12.5 12.S 11.1 11.1 ·.1 10.7 10.S 10.S 30.4 12.7 13,7
Dolay Ad`jr 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M`jnel/Veht 12.9 12,S 22.S 11.1 11.1 ·.1 10.7 30.S 10.5 10.4 12.7 13.T
bO· by ~: B B · · · A · · B B · ·
Approacbl~l ~ 13.· 10~0 1o.6 12.1
Delay Ad`j, 1.o0 1.00 1.0o 1.oo
Ai~zAd`j De I: 12.5 10.6 10.6 12.1
Lo~ by Appr~ · n · B
Approach: Worth lolled forth ]o~d ·alt ~ ·el~
Horsiest: L - T - · v. . T - · L - T - ! L - ~ -
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... Il ...............
Min. Green i o 0 0 0 o o 0 o o o o o
............ I ............... Il ............... II ............... II ...............
voluIe I~odule t
BOle VOl** 41 40 72 ' 46 102 71 30 176 32 05 104
OrOV~h Ad`jz1.0I 1.0I 1.08 1.0I 1.0I 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.0I 1.08 1.0I 1.0I
%olt~ml Iisi44 52 76 S0 111 ~7 22 103 1S 4· 113 13
Added Volt 0 14 20 0 I · 7 10 0 l· II 0
ATI: 6 6 0 0 10 1· 46 ' 0 · 0 0 0
Znitlol rut:S0 72 01 $0 120 100 0· 20· 40 00 131 13
UIer Ad.J: 1.00l. O01.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
~ J~`jt 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
l~F VolI: 00 73 II 50 123 109 16 206 40 68 131 33
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol;S0 72 ·1 ·0 129 10S IS 206 40 66 131 13
~C~ Ad,J: 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.oo 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
MLP AdJ* 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
F~oal Vol.: SO 72 99 S0 120 10S 36 206 40 68 131 13
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... il ...............
~t~lj4oltIe~t: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.23 0.33 0.64 O.20 0.72 1.00 1.00 0.64 0.16 1.00 0.91 0.00
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ...............
~pSCity Analysi! Nodule:
0.40 0.40 0.60 0.34 0.34 0,10 0.27 0.44 0.44 0.14 0.27 0.27
D~l~y/Veh~ 13.1 13.1 13.1 12.2 12.1 9.S 10.I 13.3 13.3 10.7 11.3 11.3
Dolly Ad`j: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M`j~el/veh: 13.1 13.1 13.1 12.3 12.3 0.5 10.0 13.3 13.3 10.7 11.3 ll.3
LOg by Nova: · B · · B A B · · · · I
ApproacM~l, 13.1 l 3.2 12.6 11.1
Delay Ad`j: 1.00 1.00 1:00 l.O0
A~prAd`jDel: 13.1 11.3 12 .~ 11.1
LOB by Al)pr ~ · i · ·
M~mcim elt~ WAY. & Ton~ ~v. k~med~ 01t~ ~xMgueo M. & ?mm ~v.
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
Nih. Orae~ t · 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... II ............... I
Voluma ~odule z
kin volt 17 08 S3 13 03 11 05 lO 10 ii 177
· Eow~h,AdJ!1.13 1.11 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.11 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.13 1.12
Initial ·let 10 110 0J 13 103 IS ?4 0! 34 71 ltl
Added Volf · I 13 0 16 ? 0 11 0 10 13 0
ATI: I 0 · · · ! · 10 O 3 0 0 0
her M~t 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1,001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
W M~.~ l.o0 1.00 ~.00 ~.00~.00 1.00 ~.001.00 ~.00 ~.00 i.00 Z.00
~ ~lm, l0 127 ?1 13 1~3 71 J0 ~10 36 ~0 311 S3
l~ ~lt 0 0 0 0 · · 0 · o 0 · 0
~ M~J 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.001.001.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00
~F M~t 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.001.00l. O01.001.00 1.00 1.00
Fhal ~1.: ~ 12~ 72 13 12] 72 J0 110 Jl 90 311 S2
............ I ............... Jl ............... II ............... Jl ............... J
· ~al lat. s SO 31~ leo SI 46l SI~ SOS 433 137 S24 46~ 114
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... Ii ............... I
~l/lits 0.40 0.40 0.40 O.ll O.~l 0.~1 O.ZI O.2i O.li 0.~? 0.45 0.45
~l~/Veh~ 13.0 13.0 ~].0 ~1.3 ~Z.3 ~.2 ~0.1 lo.I ~o.I ZO.I ~3.2
hl~ Mi: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
M~I/Vebt 13.0 13.0 1].0 11.3 11.3 9.~ 10.i ~0.1 10.O 10.6 13.2
~ ~ ~et B B B B B A B B B B B B
~1~ Mit 1.00 ~.00 1.00 1.00
~J~lt 13.0 10.6 10, I 12. S
Approach, Worth Bound Woutb Bound hit lo~ Wilt Bound
Novemelt t L - T - It L - T - ! L - T * · L - T - It
............ I ............... Il ............... II ............... II ............... I
Hill. 8teen: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 O
Volum Nodule:
· asa Vol, 41 40 72 46 102 ?1 I0 176 11 is 104 13
Initial ·set46 S4 il $2 114 10 34 107 36 $0 116 13
Added Vol~ 0 14 20 0 I ! ? 1s 0 19 Il ·
&TI t I S 0 0 ll 1S 41 0 S 0 · 0
znitisl rut,l`) ?? 101 $`) 140 10i 07 212 41 69 134 13
User mi, l.oo1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 l.oo
PIF M~8 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00~-~001.00
I~ Voltule: S2 ?? 101 S2 ll0 100 l? 212 41 0J 134 13
leduct Vol~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Iteduced Volz S2 77 101 S2 140 100 l? 213 41 60 130 13
Iq~ Ad]: 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
N~F ild~t 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1,00
fiual vol.: S2 ?? 101 53 140 108 17 313 41 60 134 13
saturltioa Flay Nodule,
MJultulent~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Linnet 0.3] 0.33 0.44 0.3? 0.73 1.00 1.00 0.04 0.16 1.00 0.01
Final Sat., 111 170 2IS 139 3?9 SI? S00 461 00 4?0 4?3
............ J ............... il ............... Ji ............... il ............... I
C~paCity Anelysia Nodules
Vol/sat: 0.4] 0.4] 0.4] 0.3? 0.37 0.10 0.17 0.40 0.4S 0.14 0.20
1Mlsy Mit 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00
LOS by Appr: B · B I
kltmuec~;~ # t t 9:. Fm,;~.~ Or. & Tml~ Ay.
Approach: ~rth ~d ~tb ~d Bait ~d West ~d
R~uct Vol: O 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0
CritiCal ~p
fol~T~g~ ..... ~ .... ~ ].S ~ 3.3 2.2 ~ ~ ~---~ ~ ~
............ I ............... IJ ............... IJ ............... I[ ...............
............ [ ............... [I ............. ~-IJ ............... Il ............... I
~ve~ Or 8e~ice ~u~e:
~oac~gt * I *
-= 1. : ':
Approach: ~rth ~ ~th ~d Bast
~t: b - T - ! b - T - I L * T -
............ J ............... Il ............... JJ ...............
Base voX2 0 · 0 41 0 65 98 36 0 0 93 45
~h ~ Z.08 1.08 Z.08 ~.0O ~.08 1.08 Z.01 ~.08 1.0g ~.0O 1.00 ~.08
~ Vo~t 0 0 0 0 0 I I 0 0 0 0 0
ATI: 0 0 0 O 0 6 ~3 0 0 0 0 0
lnit/a~ ~tt 0 0 0 50 0 77 120 39 0 0 101 49
Ui~ Mi: 1.001.00 ~.00 3.00~.0O 1.00 ~.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
~ Mi: 1.001.00 1.00 1.0O1.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
~ Vol~: 0 0 0 S0 0 77 120 39 0 0
l~t Vo~, 0 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
fbi1 Vol. t 0 · · SO 0 11 120 39 0 0 ~01
~ltical ~p
Foli~b~---~ ~ ~ 3.S ~ 3.3 3.~ ~
............ I ............... II ............... Il ............... II ............... I
............ J ............... J[ ........... ;---Il ...............
Ai~cht Iorth Bound South Bound Beat Bound West Bound
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... Il ...............
Volume ~dule x
Bnls Volt 0 0 · A6 0 05 ~1 36 · 0 92
~ Mi, X.22 1.12 1.12 1.13 1.12 1.13 1.13 1.13 1.12 1.12 1.12 1.12
Initial lse,0 0 · 52 0 73 110 ~0 0 0 10~ S0
~ ~X: 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0
ATZ: · 0 0 0 0 6 ~3 0 0 0 0 0
lnitAa~ ~, 0 0 0 S2 0 l0 12~ 40 0 0 104
User Mi, 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00
~ Mit 1.001.00 X.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00
~ ~1~ 0 0 0 S3 0 l0 134 40 0 0 104 S0
l~t vol~ · 0 · O 0 0 0 · 0 0 0 0
Fi~I Vol., 0 O 0 S3 0 l0 124 40 0 0 104 S0
~itleal ~p ~le,
............ { ............... Il ............... {I ............... Il ...............
............ { ............... Il ............... {I ............... {{ ............... I
~ Of fenice
--. 1. : '1
~pd-mqd~M,qubn
............ J ............... {{ ............... {J ...............
Vol~ ~ulez
hie vol, O o o 3s o 18m
Initial Bee, 0 0 0 39 o 309 106
~ voit 0 0 0 0 0 2 { · 0 0 0 0
ATE, 0 0 0 0 0 71 6S 0 0 0 0 0
Initial ~t, 0 0 0 39 O 202
P~ ~J~ 1.001.00 1.00 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 X.00
~ Vol~s 0 0 0 39 0 282
l~uct Vol~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 ·
final Vol., 0 0 0 39 0 281 1~3
~i~ical oep ~ule:
............ { ............... {{ ............... }{ ...............
Ca~ci~y ~le,
............ { ............... {{ ............... {J ............... {{ ............... J
Level Of Se~lce ~let
~ac~l, ~ 11.0 ~ -~-~--
Inf~llmcl~ #120:. II~y AY. & I~oddgu~ Av.
t
~ ..'' r"
AppEolch= kr~h Bound ~outh Bound hit Bound Welt Bound
Moveme~tt b - T - it b - T - It
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... Jl ............... I
M4~. ~ree~l t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
............ I-' ..............JJ ...............Il ...............Jl ...............I
Vo%um~ ModuXmt
B~se Vol: .iTS 411 3 4 163 66
Oro~th Ad~* t. OI X;OIX.OI LOI t.OI t;O! l. OI l. OI 1.OI l.OI X.OI X.OI
Added *lit 2i 0 O 0 0 ? 6 0 Il 0 0 0
ATI, 0 ) 0 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
%nitim% Fur, 316 4S~ 3 · III · ?9 %44 % 70 · S Il
UIIr Ad~t %.00%.00 1.O0 1.00 1.00 %.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 %.00
~ Ad~t l.O01.00 1.00 l. OO l.O0' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00l,O0
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............I
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... II ............... I
Capacity AnAX%WiI Nodule,
Delay Mi.' 1.00 l. O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.O0 %.00 l.O0 %.00 l. O0 1.00 %.o0
Ap~L'o~cld2el ~ 44.6 ll.I
Del~y Ad~J~ 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ApprMJDel: 44 .i 1%.1 12.$
IMmacam o12o:. B~n~ Ay · .u~m ~v Inlmecl~n #1~. Btm~ Ay. & Hcd~l~m Ay.
a a
Jq~p~oacht Iorth Bound ~c~th Bound hat Bound West BO~ Approacht ~ozth Bound South Bound Beat Bo~ bet Bound
............ I ............... Il ............... 1l ............... Il ............... I ............ I ............... Il ............... II ............... 11 ........... ~---I
Hl~. Or~t 0 0 0 0 0 · · · · · · · M~. Gre~t 0 0 · 0 0 · 0 · 0 0 0 0
: ...........I ...............Il ...............Il ...............II ...............I ............ I ...............II ...............Il ...............Il .......~ .......
· aBe Veil 17S 418 3 4 1i3 Si 127 I 48 I S ~0 bsa Volt 49 333 S 17 380 116 240 4
~ Volt 24 0 0 0 0 ~ 4 0 18 0 0 · ~ Volt lo 0 0 0 0 9 7 · 27 0 0 ·
ATI~ 0 ZI 0 0 7 0 · 0 0 0 0 · ~ 0 32 0 0 33 O 0 · 0 0 · ·
~er MJt 1.001.00 ~.00 1.002.00 ~.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00 Uger ~Jt 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.O0 1.001.00 {,00 1.00 1.00 l. O0
~ MJ~ 1.00Z.0g ~.00 1,001.00 ~.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00 ~.00 ~ MJz 1.00~.00 {,00 ~.00 1.00 ~.00 2.001.00 1.00 2.00 1,~0 2.00
~ ~1~ ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l~t VoZ~ · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ MJs 1.001.00 l. O01.00~.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~ MJ~ 1.001.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.O01.00 ~.00 1.00 ~.00 1.00
K~ Mit 1.0{1.00 ~.00 ~.00~.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.O0 1.00 KF Mi: 1.001.00 1.00 i. O0 1.001.00 1.00l.O0 1.00 1.00 l.O0 i.0Q
............ I ...............Il ...............II ...............II ...............I ............ I ...............Il ...............II ...............Il ...............
M~Btmtt 1.00 l. O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. OO 1.0O 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0O 1.00 MJultmtt l,OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l. OO 1.00 1.00
............ I ...............II ...............I~ ...............Il ...............J ............ I ...............IJ ...............IJ ...............Jl
~1/~* ~.01 1.01 1.01 0.4~ 0.43 0.43 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.0S 0.0S 0.OS Vol/faCt 0,67 0.~7 0.67 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.64 0.64 0.~4 0.07 0.07 0.07
~c~l t S9.S 12.3 13.0 10.0 ~lc~l t 30.1 53.1 19.3
~lay Mit 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~lay ~J* 1.00 1.00 1.00 ~.00
............ I ............... Il ............... Il ............... II ............... I
Ore~t 7 10 10 7 ~0 10 7 10 10 7 10 10
............ J ............... Il ............... JJ ............... It ............... I
VoZ~ ~let
~1~ 67 8~ 76 330 21Z S7 74 674 6~ 109 423 106
~hMJ* 1.08 Z.Oe 1.08 ~.06 1.00 ~.OI ~.Oa ~.08 Z.O8 1.08 ~.OO 1.00
~lt ~ 0 0 0 ~3 0 0 0 · 0 · 0
0 I 0 0 0 0 0 2 · 0 0
hLtial ht~ ~2 90 13 26~ ~3J 63 80 732 68 118 675 135
Oflr'MJ* 1.001.00 l. O01.001.00 1.00 1.00l. O01.00 l. O0 1.00 1.00
l~ VOL~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 00 0 0 0 0 0
Mit ~.00l.O0 1.00 1.001.00i.00 l. O0 1.00 1.00 1.001.00 l. O0
VOl.: 7~ 90 82 ~6~ 229 63 lO 733 S8 118 6~S
~/Be: lO00 IlO0 IlO0 1800 1100 ilO0 IlO0 ilO0 1100 1800 2800 1BO0
MJult~tt 0.97 0.9~ 0.97 0.9~ 1.00 ~.00 0.97 1.03 1.00 O.J7 1.03 ~.00
~08~ 0.30 0.3~ 0.33 1.00 0.79 0.21 ~.00 ~.82 O.lO 1.00 1.64 0.34
gl~.: 519 643 589 17S0 1417 383 I~SO 3384 ~ll 17S0 3093
............ I .......... ; .... Il ............... II ............... II ............... I
VOI~C~p2 O.dS 0.4S 0.4S 0.49 0.S2 0.S2 0.39 0.S2 0.S2 0.S3 0.S3 O.S~
~JFctr~ 0.8S 0.8S 0.9S 1.00 O.OS 0,8S 1.00 0.8S O.OS 1.00 0.8S 0.8s
~si~e, 2 2 2 S S I 2 15 I 3 14
t
Appzoech~ I~ortb Bound So. th Bound Belt Bo~d wem~ ~
Vol~ ~le:
............ ~ ...............JJ ...............Jl ...............JJ ...............J
Inlmmcdkm #'~22: Boln~ Rd. & Blmmy Ay.
W #122: Bolln~er Rd. & Blmey Ay.
............ I ............... II ...............II ...............II ...............I
............ I ............... II ...............II ...............II ...............I
Ui~ MJ~ 1.00 l. O01.00 ~.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LO0 1.00 l. O01.00
~ M~ LO0 1.00 LO0 1.00 1.00 1.00 LO0 LO0 LO0 LOO 1.00 1.00
~t ~1~ 0 · 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ M~z 1.00 l. O01.00 1.00 l. O01.00 1.00 1.00 l. O01.00 LO0 1.00
~ Mi: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.O0 1.00
............ I- .............. II ...............II ...............II ...............I .
............ I ............... II ..........~ .... II ...............II ...............I
~J~tr~ O.OS O.IS O.BS l.o00.IS 0.8S 1.00 O.OS 0.85 1.00 0.8S 0.8S
Kin, Gre~t 7 10 lO 7 10 10 7 10 10 7- 10 10
............ I ............... II ............... II ............... Il ............... I
Vol~ ~ule~
~d~ Volt 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 · 0 0 0
User MJi 1.00 1.00 l. O01.00 l.O0 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.oo l.O0 1.0o 1.00
~HF MJ~ l. OO 1.001.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0~1.00 !.00
............ I ...............II ...............II ...............II ...............I
............ I ...............II ...............Il ...............II ...............I
Pqe ~44
APPENDIX B
APPROVED AND PENDING DEVELOPMENTS
Approved ?roj~"~ Trips
Inter~ecfion: DeAnza Blvd. & Rodrigues Ave.
AWl Peak Hour
Approved Project
Location A (City Library)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andronico's Market)
Location D (lip Cupmino Campus)
Location FAr (City Center)
Location O (Adobe Inn)
Location H (Cupertino Comm Svcs)
Location I (P.J. Mulligan)
Location J (Market Place Expansion)
Location K (Chica[~o pi~)
TOTALS
Vehicular Movement Volumes
SBR SBT SBL
9
6
5
1
3
0 27 8
WBR
WBT WBL
3O
0 I 30
NBR NBT
4
36
7
1
0 53 2
NBL
EBR · EBT
0 2 0
EBL
Intersection: DeAnza Blvd. & McClellan Rd.
AM Peak Hour
Approved Proj~-'t
Location A (City Library)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andronico's Market)
LogEcation D (HP Cupertino Campus)
T ~on E/F (City Ccitt)
I.~_.don G (Adobe Inn)
Location H (Cupcriino Corem Svcs)
Location I (P.J. Mulligan)
Location J (Market Place Expansion)
Location K (Chica~o
TOTALS
SBR SBT SBL
9
6
35
1
3
3
0 48 9 I 4
Vehicular Movement Volumes
WBR WBT WBL
4 1 1
1 1
NBR NBT
2
28
9
1
0
2
3
2 43 0
NBL
EBR EBT
0 2 8
EBL
Intersection: Torre Ave. & Rodri[lUeS Ave.
AM Peak Hour
Approved Proje, ct
[ SBR SBT SBL
Location A (City Library)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andronico's lViark~)
Location D (liP Cupertino Campus)
Location E/F (City C.~nter)
Location G (Adobe Inn)
Location H (Cupertino Corem Svca)
Location I (PJ. Mulligan)
Localion .I (Market Place Expansion)
Location K (Chical~o Pizza)
TOTALS
3O
2
30 2 0
Vehicular Movement Volumes
WBR WBT
WBL NBR NBT
1
0 0 I
N-BL ] EBR
I 2
1 2
EBT
EBL
10
0 10
Pa~e 1 of 8'
Approved Projects Trips
Intersection: Tone Ave. & Pacifica Dr.
AM Peak Hour
Approved Project
Location A (City Library)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andronico's Market)
Location D (I-IP Cupertino Campus)
Location F_~ (City Center)
Location G (Adobe Inn)
Location H (Cup=rtino Corem Svcs)
Location I (P.J. Mulligan)
Location $ (Market Place Expansion)
Location K (Clfica[;o Pizza)
TOTALS
Vehicular Movement Volumes
[ SBR SBT SBL
0 0 0
WBR
WBT WBL
6
0 6 0
NBR
NBT NBL
0 0 0
EBR EBT EBL
,13
0 13 0
Intersection: DeAnza Blvd. & Stevens Cr. Blvd.
AM Peak Hour
V=hicular Movement Volumes
Approved Project
Location A (City Library)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andronico's Markct)
Location D (HP Cup=rtino Campus)
Location E/F (City Cent=r)
Location G' (Adobe Inn)
Location H (Cupertino Cornm Svcs)
Location I (P.J. Mulligan)
Location $ (Market Place Expansion)
Location K (Chicago Pizza)
TOTALS
SBR SBT SBL
13
7
1
I
2 6 25
WBR
19
4
5
4
32
WBT WBL
3
3 6
19 4
3 1
2 3
3 3
1
NBR NBT NBL
4
2
0
36
9 33 18
1
2
3
34 17 .I si 33 24
EBR E, BT EBL
8
4 6 4
17
3 6
5
15 41 4
Intersection: DeAnza Blvd. & Bollin~ler Rd.
AM Peak Hour
Approved Project
Location A (City L~rary)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andronico's Market)
Location D CdP Cupertino Ca. us)
Location E/F (City Center)
Location G (Adobe Inn)
Location H (Cupertino Corem Svcs)
Location I (P.J. Mulligan)
Location J (Market Place Expansion)
Location K (Chicago Pizza)
TOTALS
SBR SBT SBL
1
3' 3
35'
I
2 1
3
· 45 4
Vehicular Movement Volumes
WBR WBT
11
12 0
WBL
NBR NBT NBL
2
17
9
1
0
2
3
EBR
0
EBT EBL
0 0
Page 2 of 8
Approved Projects Trips
~- Intersection: Stevens Cr. Blvd. & Torre Ave.
AM Peak Hour
Approved Pro)eot
Location A (City L~rary)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andmnico's Mark=t)
Location D (HP Cul~-rtino Campus)
Location E/F (City Crater)
Location G (Adobe Inn)
Location H (C~o Corem Svcs)
Location I (Pg. Mulligan)
Location J (Market Place Expansion)
Location K (Chicago Pizza)
TOTALS
Vehicular Movement Volumes
SBR SBT SBL WBR WBT WBL NBR NBT NBL EBR EBT EBL
2 1
9 0 0
8
8
2
10
1
40
13
.0
53
13
1
8
8
0 139 64
Intersection: Stevens Cr. Blvd. & Blane¥ Ave.
AN Peak Hour
Approved Pro)ect
Location A (City Library)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andronico's Mark=t)
Lo~tion D ~ Cup~'tino Campus)
' :on E/F (City Cent~)
L~..,~don G (Adobe Inn)
Location H (Cupertino Corem Svcs)
Location I (P.S. Mulligan)
Location ~ 0Vlark=t Place Expansion)
Location K (Chicago Pizza)
TOTALS
SBR SBT SBL
1 2
1
5 7
1
5 7
] 13 2 14
WBR
5
Vehicular Movement Volumes
WBT WBL NBR NBT
1 2 1 1
3
$
7
13
9
1 1
42 2 ] 2 1 0
NBL
t~BR EBT EBL
4
53
26
9
4 102 17
Intersection: Blaney Ave. & Rodri~lues Ave.
Approved Pro~ect
Location A (City Librm'y)
Location B (Oak V~lley)
Location C (Andronico's Market)
Location D flip Cupmino Campus)
Location FJF (City Center)
Location G (Adobe Inn)
Location H (Cupextino Corem SVCS)
Location I (PJ. Mulligan)
Location J (Mark=t Place Expansion)
Location K (Chicago Pizza)
TOTALS
SBR SBT SBL
4
0 4 0
WBR
..0 0 0
Vehicular Movement Volumes
WBT WBL
NBR NBT NBL
0 3 0
AN Peak Hour
EBR EBT EBL
0 0 0
Page 3 of 8
Appmvecl l:h'oj ects T~ps
Intersection: Blaney Ave. & Bollin~ler Rd.
AM Peak Hour
^pp~oved l~'o.iect
Location A (City Library)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andronico's Market)
Location D (lip Cupertino Campus)
Location E/F (City C~nter)
Location G (Adobe Inn)
Location H (Cupertino Corem Svc$)
Location I (P.S. Mulligan)
Location J (Market Place Expansion)
Location K (,Chical/o pizza}
TOTALS
SBR SBT SBL [WBR
1
0 0 0
Vehicular Movement Volumes
WBT WBL N'BR NBT
0 0 0
~L
1
EBR EBT EBL
0 1 0
Page 4 of 8
Approved l~oj~c~ Trips
~ Intersection: DeAnza Blvd. & Rodrigues Ave.
PM Peak Hour
Al~roved Project
Location A (City Library)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andronico's Market)
Location D (HP Cupertino Campus)
Location F_YF (City Cemer)
Location 6 (Adobe Inn)
Location H (Cupertino Corem Svcs)
Location I (P.S. Mulligan)
Location J (Market Place Expansion)
Location K (Chica[~o
TOTALS
SBR SBT SBL
43
1 3
34
4 39
I
3
4
12
2
106 39
WBR
Vehicular Movement Volumes
WBT
WBL [ NBR NBT
47
3
8
19 32
l
1
3
5
4
6 19 [ 0 104
NBL
EBR EBT EBL
O S 1
Intersection: DeAnza Blvd. & McClellan Rd.
PM Peak Hour
Vehicular Movement Volumes
Approved Project
Location A (City Library)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andronico's Market)
Loji~tion D (lip Cupertino Campus)
I' ~n E/F (City Center)
Li,..uon G (Adobe Inn)
Location H (Cupertino Corem Svcs)
Location I (P.I Mulligan)
Location J (Market Place Expansion)
Location K (Chicato Pizza)
TOTALS
SBR SBT SBL
1
2
28
23
1
3
4
12
2
43
[ 7 75 43
WBR WBT WBL
47 12 12
47 12 12
NBR NBT
11
2
6
39
1.
1
4
11 61 0
NBL
EBR EBT EBL
Il
0 11 4
Intersection: Tone Ave. & Rodrlilues Ave.
PM Peak Hour
Approved Proj~c~
Location A (City Library)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andmnico's Market)
Location D (I-IP Cupertino Campus)
Location F_YF (City Center)
Location G (Adobe Inn)
Location H (Cupertino Corem Svcs)
location I (P.I. Mulligan)
Location 3 (Market Place Expansion)
Location K (Chica~o Pizza)
TOTALS
SBR
19
19
Vehicular Movement Volumes
SBT SBL WBR
10
.10. 0 [ 0
WBT WBL
0 0
NBR NBT
0 6 6
NBL
EBR EBT EBL
46
Page 5 of 8 '
Approved Projects Trips
Intersection: Torre Ave. & Pacifica Dr.
PM Peak Hour
Approval Pro~ e~zt ,, ,,
Location A (City Library)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andronico's Market)
Location D (HP Cupertino Campus)
Location WF (City Center)
Location G (Adobe Inn)
Location H (Cupertino Corem Svcs)
Location I (P.S. Mulligan)
Location J (Market Place Expansion)
Location K (Chicago Pizza)
TOTALS
SBR SBT SBL
0 0 0 [ 0
Vekicular Movement Volumes
WBR
WBT WBL
71
71 O
NBR NBT NBL
0 0 0
EBR BBT EBL
65
0 65 0
Inter~ecflon: DaAnza Blvd. & Stevens Cr. Blvd.
PM Peak Hour
Approval Project
Location A (City Library)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andronico's Market)
Location D (HP Cupertino Campus)
Location F./F (City Center)
Location G (Adobe Inn)
Location H (Cupertino Corem Svcs)
Location I (P.J. Mul~gan)
Location J (Market Place Expansion)
Location K (Chicago Pizza)
TOTALS
SBR
Vehicular Movcmant Volum~
SBT SBL WBR
5
25 53 15
7 6
3 5
4 4
2 6
2 2 4
32 71 40
WBT WBL
11
4
17 34
15 4
4 1
3 3
4 4
18 12
76 58 I
I~R NBT I~BL
6 41
6
4
8
18 16 9
1
1
3
5
4
36 26 60
EBR
13
BBT
5
4
3
26
5
1
7
57 56
EBL
2
2
4
lnter~ecflon: DeAnza Blvd. & Bollin~ler Rd,
PM Peak Hour
Approved Pro. iect
Location A (City Library)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andronico's Market)
Location D (liP Cupertino Campus)
Location E/F (City Center)
Location G (Adobe Inn)
Location H (Cupertino Corem Svcs)
Location I (P.J. Mulligan)
Location J (Market ?lace Expansion)
Location K (Ch/cago Pizza)
TOTALS
Vehicular Movement Volumes
SBR SBT SBL
12
1 1
17 11
23
1
2 1
4
12
2
0 74 13
WBR
4
WBT
WBL
NBT NBL
11
1
3
39
1
1
3
5
4
EBR EBT EBL
1 0 0
Page 6 of 8
ii';
App;oved l~ojccts Trips
._. Intersection: Stevens Ct. Blvd. & Torre Ave. PM Peak Hour
Approved Project
Location A (City Library)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andronico's Market)
Location D ~ Cupertino Campus)
Location F..rF (City C~nt~r)
Location G (Adobe Inn)
Location H (Cupmino Corem Svcs)
Location I (PJ. Mulligan)
Location $ (Market Place Expansion)
TOTALS
SBR SBT SBL
13 0 0
Vehicular Movement Volumes
WBR WBT WBL
10
11
4
50
34
11 12
5 3
12
4
$ 165 22
NBR NBT
6
6 0
NBL [ EBR EBT EBL
5
4
11
20 30
13
5
12
14
2
0 [ 0 86 30
Intersection: Stevens Cr. Blvd. & Blane¥ Ave.
PM Peak Hour
Appmv~ Pro~e~t
Location A (City Library)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andronico's Market)
Lo..~tion D ('I'IP Cupertino Campus)
L ~n E/F (City Center)
Lv_..-on G (Adobe Inn)
Location H (Cupertino Corem Svcs)
Location I (P.J. Mulligan)
Location $ (Market Pla~¢ Exp~u~ion)
Location K (Chicato Pizza)
TOTALS
[ SBR SBT SBL
5 11
5
6
6
22 11 18
WBR
Vehicular Movement Volumes
WBT WBL
5
11
3
5O
29
12
36 3
3
NBR NBT
12 12
155 8 [ 13 12
NBL
EBR EBT EBL
6
5
1 3
11
3 17
11
14
2
11
5
12
Intersection: Blaney Ave. & Rodri~luea Ave.
4 63 34
Approved Project
Location A (City Library)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andronico's Market)
Location D (lip Cupertino Campus)
Location F. YF (City C,~nte~)
Location G (Adobe Inn)
Location H (cupertino Corem Sv~)
Location I (P.J. Mulligan)
Location J (Market Pla~e Expansion)
Location K (Chical~o Pizza)
TOTALS
SBR SBT SBL
16
3
0 19. 0
WBR
Vehicular Movement Volumes
WBT WBL [ NBR NBT
24
o o' o
1
1
26
PM Peak Hour
NBL EBR EBT EBL
0 0 0
Page 7 of.8
Approved Projects Trips
Intersection: Binney Ave. & BollinC, ler
PM Peak Hour
Ap. proved Project
Location A (City Library)
Location B (Oak Valley)
Location C (Andronico's Market)
Location D (lip Cupertino Campus)
Location FdF (City Center)
Location G (Adobe Inn)
Location H (Cupertino Comm $vcs)
Location I (P..I. Mulligan)
Location I ('Market Place Expansion)
Location It (Chicalo ?izza)
TOTALS
SBR SBT SBL
3
0 3 6
Vehicular Movement Volumes
WBT WBL
$ 0 0
NBR NBT
1
NBL
0
EBR EBT EBL
0 1 0
Pas¢ 8 of 8'
APPENDIX C
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
~-/5-? ..
APPENDIX D
TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS
Transporation Demand'Management Program Elements
The Transportation Demand Management (TDlV0 Program for the Town Center Phase 1
development should include elements that produce a well-balanced 'plan. It is
recommended that the TDM Program be implemented during building occupancy to
encourage maximum participation of employees. With sufficient marketing of commute
options, employees can be encouraged to use alternative modes, such as carpooling or
bicycling, before they start driving alone.
TDM Manager nnd Annual Reporting Process
The TDM Manager will actively market the TDM Program to the employees. They will
provide information regarding commute option with au on-site transportation information
center. Specifically, the center will have VTA and CalTrain schedules and maps, bicycle
facilitymaps, and information regarding earpool and vanpool matehlng services provided
through RIDES~.
The TDM Manager must also provide an annual report to the City on the success of the
TDM Program. The success of the TDM Program can be measured by the percentage of
participating employees. This is typically determined through surveys. All employees are
asked to fill out a questionnaire for the selected survey day or week with questions
regarding travel mode. An example survey form for a week-long survey is presented in
the Appendix. This form also includes questions designed to elicit information regarding
measures that are likely to change travel behavior. A high response rate (around 60
percent) is needed for the survey results to be truly indicative of TDM Program
participation.
On-Site Facilities
On-site amenities will be provided to promote the use of alternative modes and to reduce
employee reliance on the single-occupant automobile. On-site amenities include bicycle
storage racks and lockers, shower facilities, and preferential parking spaces for carpools
and vanpools. Carpool/vanpool spaces will be designated with signage or pavement
striping. The mixed-use nature of the site with nearby retail uses and restaurants provides
on-site food services and shopping.
Guaranteed Ride Home Program
employee contacts the TDM Manager When they need a ride home and the TDM
Manager then makes ~e travel arrangements.
In-House Carpool Matching Service
Carpools are the most popular alternative commute mode. Initially, RIDES will be used
to conduct the carpool matching service. An in-house matching service, in conjunction
with a vigorous marketing campaign, will be used to increase the percentage of
employees that share a ride to work.
Flex'time Policy
Tenants should be encouraged to provide flexible work schedules for their employees,
within the legal bounds of the California labor laws. In addition to allowing employees
to work when they are most productive and to attend to personal business (such as
doctor's appointments or shuttle children to/from school), flextime gives employees the
opportunity to travel to and/or from work during non-peak commute times, reAucing time
spent on the road and alleviating commute hour congestion. Implementation of this
policy would be dependent on the type of tenant or tenants.
EXHIBIT B
ARCHITECTURE PLANNING URBAN DESIGN
March 29, 2002
Ms. Aarti Shrivastava
Community Development Department
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
-Cuper~ino,'\CA 95014
RE: 369 40 01 7 / 10440 S. De Anza Blvd.
Dear Aarti:
I reviewed the drawings that you forwarded. I think it looks very good. I was quite pleased, and feel
that this design direction seems much better resolved than the earlier concepts. Frankly, I fred little to
comment on with this submittal except in a positive way. The only element that jumped out at me was
the scale of the two entry arches. While the rest of the design seems very well scaled and detailed, the
entries seem much too high. Shown on the next page are the proposed elevation and a modest suggestion
for adjusting the scale.
With regard to the Torres Avenue setback, more would be good, but that would require some
substantial changes in the project. I personally would not be unduly concerned by the small setback
given the substantial depth provided at the arches on the ground level and the more deeply recessed
balcony treatment on the second floor.
Aarti, ffyou have any questions, please let me know.
Sincerely,
CANNON DESIGN GROUP
Larry L. Cannon AIA AICP
President
?CEIVEDI
PR, ?00
TEL: 415.331.3795 FAX: 415.331.3797
180 HARBOR DRIVE.SUITE 219. SAUSAL1TO. CA94965
Office Building at 10440 De Anza
)esign Review Comments
.~Iarch 29, 2002 Page 2
Currently proposed entry
Recessed arch area
Molding
and molding
WOOD FR, A,M ED WOOO FRAMED
Alternate entry approach
CANNON DESIGN GROUP
180 HARBOR DRIVE. SUITE 219. SAUSALITO. CA94965
CUPEI TINO
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3251
FAX (408) 777-3333
Community Development Department
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Project Title: Civic Park Phase 1
ICase File
ttachments
Project Location: Southwest comer of Rodri.ques and Torre Avenues
Project Description: The project consists of a new two-story 28,000 sq.ft, office
buildin.q with a 44-car unde .rRround parkin.q .qara,qe and a 2,500 sq.ft, retail building. The
proiect also includes demolition of two sinRle-story office buildin.qs totalin,q 10,096 sq.ft..
to create a temporary parkin.q lot.
Environmental Setting:
The site is currently a parkin,q lot and part of a 12.4 acre developed property consisting
of nineteen (19) one and two-story office buildinRs. The block to the north consists of
mid-rise and hi.qh-rise office buildin.qs and apartment complexes. Properties to the west
consist of retail uses alon.q De Anza Boulevard. The site is bounded by townhomes, City
Hall and Library to the east, and one-story office buildin,qs and townhouses to the south.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Site Area (ac.) - 12.44 acres Building Coverage- 35.81% Exist. Buildings- 149,132s.f.
Proposed Bldg. - 28,500 + 2,500 Zone - P - Planned Devpt.. Office G.P. Designation -
Commercial/Office/Residential
Assessor's Parcel No. - 369-40-017
If Residential, Units/Gross Acre -
Unit Type #1
Unit Type #2
Total# Rental/Own Bdrms Total s.f. Price
Unit Type #3
Unit Type #4
Unit Type #5
Applicable Special Area Plans: (Check)
[] Monta Vista Design Guidelines
[] N. De Anza Conceptual
[] Stevens Crk Blvd. Conceptual
If Non-Residential, Building Area - 30,500
Employees/Shift - Parking Required 786 spaces
Project Site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area -
[] S. De Anza Conceptual
[] S. Sara-Sunny Conceptual
[] Stevens Creek Blvd. SW & Landscape
s.f. FAR - 33% for entire site Max.
Parking Provided 752 spaces
YES [] NO []
A. CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN SOURCES
1. Land Use Element
2. Public Safety Element
3. Housing Element
4. Transportation Element
5. Environmental Resources
6. Appendix A- Hillside Development
7. Land Use Map
8. Noise Element Amendment
9. City Ridgeline Policy
10. Constraint Maps
B. CUPERTINO SOURCE DOCUMENTS
11. Tree Praservation ordinance 778
12. City Aerial Photography Maps
13. "Cupertino Chronicle" (California History
Center, 1976)
14. Geological Report (site specific)
15. Parking Ordinance 1277
16. Zoning Map
17..Zoning Code/Specific Plan Documents
18. City Noise Ordinance
CITY AGENCIES Site
19. Community Development Dept. List
20. Public Works Dept.
21. Parks & Recreation Department
22. Cupertino Water Utility
D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 23. County Planning Department
24. Adjacent Cities' Planning Departments
25. County Departmental of Environmental
Health
D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES (Continued) 26. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District
27. County Parks and Recreation Department
28. Cupertino Sanitary District
29. Fremont Union High School District
30. Cupertino Union School District
31. Pacific Gas and Electric
32. Santa Clara County Fire Department
33. County Sheriff
34. CALTRANS
35. County Transportation Agency
36. Santa Clara Valley Water Distdct
OUTSIDE AGENCY DOCUMENTS
37. BAAQMD Survey of Contaminant
Excesses
38. FEMA Flood MapslSCVWD Flood Maps
39. USDA, "Soils of Santa Clara County"
40. County Hazardous Waste Management
Plan
41. County Heritage Resources Inventory
42. Santa Clara Valley Water District Fuel
Leak Site
43. CalEPA Hazardous Waste and
Substances Site
OTHER SOURCES
44. Project Plan Set/Application Materials
45. Field Reconnaissance
46. Experience w/project of similar
scope/characteristics
47. ABAG Projection Series
48. Civic Park - Geotechnical Investigation,
Advance Technology, Inc., December
2000.
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment,
IVI Environmental, Inc., White Plains, NY,
May 19, 2000.
49.
A. Compleie all information requested on the Initial Study Cover page. LEAVE BLANK SPACES
ONLY WHEN A SPECIFIC ITEM IS NOT APPLICABLE.
B. Consult the Initial Study Source List; use the materials listed therein to complete, the checklist
information in Categories A through O.
C. You are encouraged to cite other relevant sources; if such sources are used, job in their title(s)
in the "Source" column next to the question to which they relate.
D. If you check any of the "YES' response to any queStions, you must attach a sheet explaining the
potential impact and suggest mitigation if needed.
E. When explaining any yes response, label your answer clearly (Example "N - 3 Historical") Please
try to respond concisely, and place as many explanatory responses as possible on each pa.qe.
F. Upon completing the checklist, sign and date the Preparer's Affidavit.
C. Please attach the following materials before submitting the Initial Study to the City.
-"Project Plan Set of Legislative Document
,/'Location map with site clearly marked
(when applicable)
2
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
[and Supporting Information Sources] ~, ~_~ mm'~~' ~ ~ ~_E E
I, AESTHETICS -Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a [] [] [] []
scenic vista? [5,9,24,41,44]
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, [] [] [] []
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and histodc buildings within a
state scenic highway? [5,9,11,24,34,41,44]
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual [] [] [] []
character or quality of the site and its
surroundings? [1,17,19,44]
d) Create a new source of substantial light or [] [] [] []
glare, which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area? [1,16,44]
Item b&d- Less Than S~qnificant Impact
The project includes the retention of specimen and heritage trees on the project site. There
are no other existing significant scenic elements on the project site. While the
redevelopment of this site will create a new source of light within a developed setting, the
light levels associated with the proposed office and retail uses are not expected to
adversely effect day or nighttime views in the area.
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In
determining whether impacts to agricultural
resources are significant environmental
effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and
Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by
the California Dept. of Conservation as an
oPtional model to use in assessing impacts
on agriculture and farmland. Would the
project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique [] [] [] []
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use? [5,7,39]
b) Conflict with existing zoning for [] [] [] []
agricultural use, or a Williamson ACt
[and Supporting Information Sources] ~ ~ E ~ '~ ~
contract? [5,7,23]
c) Involve other changes in the existing [] [] [] []
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use? [5,7,39]
II1. AIR QUALITY- Where available, the
significance criteria established by the
applicable air quality management or air
pollution control district may be relied upon
to make the following determinations. Would
the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of [] [] [] []
the applicable air quality plan? [5,37,42,44]
b) Violate any air quality standard or [] [] [] []
contribute substantially to an existing or
projected air quality violation? [5,37,42,44]
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net [] [] [] []
increase of any cdteria pollutant for which
the project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard (including releasing emissions
which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)? [4,37,44]
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial [] [] [] E]
pollutant concentrations? [4,37,44]
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a [] [] [] []
substantial number of people? [4,37,44]
Items a- c- Less than S~qnificant Impact
The proposed project would have limited air quality impacts resulting from the minor
pollutant emissions related to traffic generated by the proposed project. The Bay Area Air
Quality Management Distdct (BAAQMD) generally does not recommend that a detailed air
quality impact analysis be prepared for projects generating less than 2,000 vehicle trips per
day. The project project is expected to generate approximately 556 average daily trips,
which does not trigger a detailed air quality impact analysis under these BAAQMD
guidelines. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, which in turn
is consistent with the Clean Air Plan, therefore, no cumulative air quality impacts are
expected to result from this project. The impact of dust generated by grading and
excavation construction activities will be limited by a condition of approval requiring
watering of newly disturbed surfaces and covering of haul trucks to minimize dust
generation.
ISSUES:
[and Supporting Information Sources]
Items d-e - No Impact
The project is not expected to expose sensitive receptors (children, the elderly, the acutely
ill, and the chronically iii) to substantial pollutant concentrations.
The proposed development will not have any operations that will subject customers,
employees or neighbors to objectionable odors.
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would
the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either [] [] [] []
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by
the California Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
[5,10,27,44]
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any [] [] [] []
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies,, regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or
US Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44]
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on [] [] [] []
federally protected wetlands as defined by
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal
pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other
means? [20,36,44]
d) Interfere substantially with the movement [] [] [] []
of any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites? [5,10,12,21,26]
e) Conflict with any local policies or [] [] [] []
ordinances protecting biological resources,
such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance? [11,12,41]
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural [] [] [] []
Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat
q3-
rand Supporting Information Sources]
conservation plan? [5,10,26,27]
Item e - Less Than S~qnificant Impact with Miti.qation Incorporation
Twenty-two of the thirty-one trees on the site of the new buildings are proposed for removal
to accommodate the new underground parking garage and building footprints. Two hedtage
Coast Live Oaks will be retained and seven redwoods will be relocated. Thirty-six new trees
will be planted as mitigation for the removal.
Item a-d, f- No Impact
The project is proposed on a developed site and will not impact threatened or endangered
biological resources. The project includes landscaping, which will provide additional
vegetation on the site.
No Habitat Conservation Plans or Natural Community Conservation Plans cover the project
area.
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the
project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in [] [] [] []
the significance of a historical resource as
defined in §15064.5? [5,13,41]
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in [] [] [] - []
the significance of an archaeological
resource pursuant to §15064.5? [5,13,41]
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique [] [] [] []
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature? [5,13,41]
d) Disturb any human remains, including [] [] [] []
those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
[1,5]
Item a-d No Impact
The project is currently developed with commercial uses and is not in a sensitive
archeological area of the City. There are no historical resources on the site.
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the
project: '
a) Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the dsk
of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as [] [] [] []
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Pdolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault?
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
6
ISSUES: ~= ~ ~.~ ~ o .=_ ~. ~o -
[and Supporting Information Sources] ~ "= ~
Special Publication 42. [2,14,44,48]
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? [] [] [] []
[2,5,10,44,48]
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including [] [] [] []
liquefaction? [2,5,10,39,44,48]
iv) Landslides? [2,5,10,39,44,48] [] [] [] []
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the [] [] [] []
loss of topsoil? [2,5,10,44,48]
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is [] [] [] []
unstable, or that would become unstable as
a result of the project, and potentially result
in on- Or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
[2,5,10,39,44,48]
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined [] [] [] []
in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1997), creating substantial risks to life or
property? [2,5,10,44,48]
e) Have soils incapable of adequately [] [] [] []
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?. [6,9,36,39,44,48]
Item a(I-iii), c-d - Less Than S~qnificant Impact
According to the Cupertino General Plan, the site is in a VF-3 zone for which specific
hazards may include ground shaking and ground failure. A Geotechnical Report prepared
by Advanced Soil Techology, Inc. indicates that the liquefaction potential will be Iow. Also,
according to the report, the site will be subject to shaking amplification during earthquakes.
The site is also in the vicinity of active faults including the Monte-Vista Shannon, Berrocal
and San Andreas faults and will therefore be subject to strong shaking. The site however
does not lie within the Alquist-Priolo zones and no faults are mapped passing through the
site or in its immediate vicinity. The report recommends that the project should be
constructed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code guidelines for seismic zone 4 to
avoid or minimize potential damage from seismic shaking.
Item a(iv) b, e - No Impact
Since the project is proposed on an existing parking lot on a relatively flat lot no landslide
activity is expected. There will be no soil erosion or loss of topsoil.
The site is served by an existing sewer system.
I I I I
7
ISSUES:
[and SuppoSing Info~ation Sources]
VII. H~RDS AND H~RDOUS
MATERIALS - Would the project:
a) Create a signifi~nt h~ard to the public or
the environment through the routine
transpo~, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials? [32,40,42,43,~]
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials
into the environment? [32,40,42,43,~]
c) Emit h~ardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely h~ardous materials,
substances, or waste within one~ua~er mile
of an existing or proposed school?
[2,~,30,40,~]
d) Be located on a site which is included on a
list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Se~ion
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment? [2,42,40,43]
e) For a proje~ located within an ai~o~ land
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within ~o miles of a public ai~o~
or public use airpo~, would the proje~ result
in a safety h~ard for people residing or
working in the proje~ area? [ ]
~ For a proje~ within the vicinity of a pdvate
airstrip, would the proje~ result in a safeW
hazard for people residing or working in the
proje~ area? [ ]
g) Impair implementation of or physi~lly
inte~em with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan? [2,32,33,~]
h) Expose people or stratums to a
significant risk of loss, inju~ or death
involving wildland rims, including where
wildlands are adja~nt to u~anized areas or
where residences am inte~ixed with
wildlands?[1,2,~]
8
ISSUES: ~=~: m I-~ =mo
[and Supporting Information Sources]
Item b,d- Less Than S~qnificant Impact
Items a,c,e-h - No Impact
The proposed project will not generate additional hazardous waste, increase dsk of
accidental explosion or release of hazardous substances, interfere with emergency
services, increase exposure of peOple to hazardous waste or increase fire hazard in areas
with flammable brush, grass or trees. The current project site is not listed as a
contaminated site in the State of California Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List.
The project site is not within a two-mile radius of the nearest airport (Moffett Airfield/San
Jose Airport). Therefore, there would be no related impacts on people residing or working
!.n the project area.
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
--Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or [] [] [] []
waste discharge requirements? [20,36,37]
b) Substantially deplete groundwater [] [] [] []
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there would
be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local groundwater table level
(e.g., the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level
which would not support existing land uses
or planned uses for which permits have been
granted)? [20,36,42]
c) Create or contribute runoff water which [] [] [] []
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff? [20,36,42]
d) Otherwise substantially degrade water [] [] [] []
quality? [20,36,37]
e) Place housing within a 100-year flood [] [] [] []
hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood
Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate
Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
[2,38]
f) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area [] [] [] []
structures which would impede or redirect
flood flows? [2,38]
g) Expose people or structures to a [] [] [] []
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving flooding, including flooding as a
9
- .~.~ o= ~-., .-
~SSUES: = & ~;E & -
[and SuppoAing Info~ation Sources] ~ ~ ~ '~ '~
~ ~ ~g ~'-- -
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
[~,3~,~8]
h) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or B B B ~
mudflow? [2,36,38]
Item a,c,d- Less Than Sfqnificant Impact
Items b, e-h - No Impact
The soil borings (40 ~. depth) taken as pa~ of the geotechnical investigation did not
encountered free ground water. The proje~ is in a B flood zone as per the FIRM maps
dated May 1, 1980. As indicated above, the project site is flat. The new buildings and
parking lot will be located on a potion of the site that is cu~ently occupied by a parking
area on a developed site. The proposed development will not result in a net increase of
impermeable su~ace. All constm~ion will also be required to provide additional features to
reduce mn-off in accordance with B~S~ guidelines.
IX. ~ND USE AND P~NNING -Would
the project:
a) Physically divide an established B B ~ ~
communiST [7,12,22,41]
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, ~ ~ ~ ~
policy, or regulation of an agency with
jurisdiction over the proje~ (including, but
not limited to the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effe~?
[1,7,8,16,17,18,~]
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat ~ ~ ~ ~
conse~ation plan or natural community
conse~ation plan? [1,5,~,9,26]
Items a-c- No Impact
The proje~ is in confo~ance w~h the City's General Plan and Zoning.
X. MINE~L RESOURCES -Would the
project:
a) Result in the loss of availabili~ of a known ~ ~ ~ ~
mineral resource that would be of value to
the region and the residents of the state?
[5, ~ o]
b) Result in the loss of availabili~ of a ~ ~ ~ ~
Iocally-impo~ant mineral resource mcove~
site delineated on a local general plan,
specific plan or other land use plan? [5,10]
10
[and Supporting Information Sources] ' o ~ ~-E ~
Items a-b - No Impact
Mineral resources are not known to exist on the project site.
Xl. NOISE - Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, []
noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies? [8,18,44]
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of []
excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels? [8,18,44]
c) A substantial permanent increase in []
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without the project?
[8,18]
d) A substantial temporary or periodic []
increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing without
the project? [8,18,44]
e) For a project located within an airport land []
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project
expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
[8,18,44]
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private []
airstrip, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels? [8,18]
11
iSSUES:
--
land Supporting Information Sources]
Item a-d- Less Than $~qnificant Impact
The project is located in an area with noise levels 60dB (DNL) and less, which is
considered normally acceptable for new office development. The City's Municipal Code
standards (Chapter 10.,18 Community Noise Control) for this type of development are that
exterior noise may not exceed 55 dB at night and 65dB in the daytime. The project will not
be subject to excessive levels of groundborne vibration or groundborne noise.
The proposed development of the project site will intensify the use of the lot, which is likely
to result in increases in the ambient noise levels that exist in the project area. Increase in
noise levels would be periodic and will not substantially increase over cun'ent ambient
noise levels.
Items e,f - No Impact
The project is not within a two-mile radius of any public airports or private airstrips.
Xll, POPULATION AND HOUSING -Would
the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an [] [] [] []
area, either directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)? [3,16,47,44]
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing [] [] [] []
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44]
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, [] [] [] []
necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44]
Item a .Less Than Si.qnificant Impact
The development of a mixed-use (office/retail) project on the site is consistent with the
General Plan, which included an analysis of population and housing and was reviewed in
an EIR. Therefore, the proposed project would not induce substantial population growth or
create a demand for housing that would be inconsistent with the General Plan.
Items b-c- No Impact
The proposed project would not displace existing housing. There are currently no
residential units on this site - it is a parking lot in an office development.
XlII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or
12
ISSUES: ~= ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
[and SuppoSing Info~ation Sources] ~ ~ ~· ~ '[~ ~ ~ ~ E E
-
other peEo~ance 0bje~ives for any of the
public se~ices:
Fire prote~ion? [19,32,~] ~ D ~ ~
Police prote~ion? [33,44] D D ~ ~
Schools? [29,30,44] D D ~ ~
Parks? [5,17,19,21,26,27,44] D D ~ D
Other public facilities? [19,20,44] D ~ ~ D
Item a -Less Than S~qnificant Impact
The proje~ is located in an urbanized ama se~ed by municipal se~ices, including fire
protection, police pmte~ion, and maintenance of public facilities such as roads. An infill
project of this type and size will not significantly change or impa~ public se~ices.
XlV. RECREATION --
a) Would the proje~ increase the use of D ~ D B
existing neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
[5,17,19,21,26,27,44]
b) Does the project include recreational ~ ~ ~ ~
facilities or require the constru~ion or
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adveme physical effect on the
environment? [5,44]
Item a -No Impact
The redevelopment of the proje~ site has been accounted for in the city's General Plan,
which examined recreational oppo~unities. The General Plan does not require that
commercial development incorporate a recreational element. Them are no existing
recreational facilities on the project site.
XV. T~NSPORTATION~RAFFIC --
Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is D ~ ~ D
substantial in relation to the existing traffic
load and capacity of the street system (i.e.,
result in a substantial increase in either the
number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
inteme~ions)? [4,20,35,44,48]
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, ~ ~ ~ ~
a level of sewice standard established by the
13
ISSUES:
[and Supporting Information Sources]
i§ .-- -
county congestion management agency for
designated roads or highways? [4,20,44,48]
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, [] [] [] []
including either an increase in traffic levels or
a change in location that results in
substantial safety dsks? [4,48]
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a [] [] [] []
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)? [20,35,44,48]
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? [] [] [] []
[2,19,32,33,44,48]
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? [] [] [] []
[17,44,48]
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or [] [] [] []
programs supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle
racks)? [4,34,48]
Items a-b - Less Than S~qnificant Impact With Mit~qation Incorporation
A Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed project was prepared by Fehr and Peers
Associates, Inc. to assess the potential traffic, circulation and parking impacts of the
proposed project. The analysis indicates that the master plan, which this project is a part
of, will cause the intersection of De Anza Blvd. and McClellan Road to deteriorate to LOS E
during the PM peak hour for Year 2010 conditions. The mitigation will include intersection
improvements, which will bring the intersection to LOS D during the PM peak hour. The
project at buildout is expected to contribute to about 1% of the total traffic and Phase 1
traffic about 0.2%. As a condition of approval of this phase, the applicant will be required to
contribute their proportionate share of the cost to redesign the McClellan/De Anza signal to
enable it to function more efficiently, as described in the traffic report (page 42). The
applicant's proportionate share will equal the increment of new traffic added to the
intersection compared to the new traffic from the near term build-out in the surrounding
area.
The project will also provide neighborhood calming measures in order to reduce cut-
through traffic through neighborhoods. A condition of approval is added to this effect.
Items c-g- No Impact
The proposed project would not result in any change in air traffic patterns because the
project, which includes the construction of a two-story office building and one-story
retail/restaurant building, is not tall enough to affect air traffic patterns.
The Fire Department has determined that emergency vehicle access will be adequate.
14
ISSUES=[and =o '- ~=~ E~" '[~ '~ ~_~° ~_E~ ~' ~o ~.~
Supporting Information Sources] ~ ~ ~ a. ~
Items c-.q - No Impact (contd.)
The City's parking code requires 786 parking spaces. A parking study by the Traffic
consultant indicated that the project would need 722 spaces. The applicant is proposing to
provide 752 parking spaces. The Code allows approval of a shared parking plan under
conditions including provision of a detailed traffic study, ownership by a single entity, and
planned development zoning. The project meets the above conditions. Therefore, the
parking on-site is considered adequate.
The proposed project will provide Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures.
In addition, the project site's proximity to public transportation (V'I'A bus lines) is expected
to facilitate use of public transit.
XVl. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS -
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment [] [] [] []
requirements of the applicable Regional
Water Quality Control Board? [5,22,28,36,44]
b) Require or result in the construction of [] [] [] []
new water or wastewater treatment facilities
or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects? [36,22,28,36]
c) Require or result in the construction of [] [] [] []
new storm water drainage facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects? [5,22,28,36,44]
e) Result in a determination by the [] [] [] []
wastewater treatment provider which serves
or may serve the project that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments? [5,22,28,36,44] ,
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient [] [] [] []
permitted capacity to accommodate the
project's solid waste disposal needs? [5,44]
g) Comply with federal, state, and local [] [] [] []
statutes and regulations related to solid
Iwaste? [5,44]
15
[and Supporting Information $ource~] ~ '~ ~ g :~ '~ .~ g
Items a-f- Less than S~qnificant Impact
Sanitary sewer service is available, but the Sanitary District has indicated that the system is
at capacity and that improvements will be required along Wolfe Road. The applicants, like
other users of the system, will be required to pay District fees and obtain a permit for
construction of the project. A condition requires that if necessary improvements are
required, they shall be completed prior to building occupancy.
The project is not expected to increase demands that would exceed wastewater treatment
requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Additionally, since the project
will be required to comply with BASMAA guidelines, it is expected that there will be
reduction of runoff into the stormwater system.
The General Plan states that the Santa Clara Valley Water District has indicated it has the
ability to meet the long term water needs of Cupertino water retailers based on the
maximum growth potential of municipalities in the district. Since the project is consistent
with the Cupertino General Plan and Zoning Code, the projects impact on water usage is
expected to be less than significant.
Item g- No Impact
The project will be required to comply with all federal, state, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste.
16
ISSUES:
[and Supporting Information Sources]
a) Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects,
and the effects of probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental
effects, which will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either-directly or
indirectly?
E]
I hereby certify that the information provided in this Initial Study is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief; I certify that I have used proper diligence in responding
accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted appropriate source references
when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. I
hereby acknowledge than any substantial errors dated within this Initial Study may cause
delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and hereby agree to hold
harmless the City of Cupertino, its staff and authorized agents, from the consequences of
such delay or discontinuance.
~ ·
Preparer's Signature ~J~- ~ ' ~~
Print Preparer's Name
17
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked beloW would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is. a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the
checklist on the following pages.
[] Aesthetics [] Agriculture Resources [] Air Quality
[] Biological Resources [] Cultural Resources [] Geology/Soils
[] Hazards & Hazardous [] Hydrology / Water [] Land Use / Planning
Materials Quality
[] Mineral Resources [] Noise [] Population / Housing
[] Public Services [] Recreation [] Transportation/Traffic
[] Utilities / Service [] Mandatory Findings of
Systems Significance
DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) finds that:
[] The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and
a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[] Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have
been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
[] The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
[] The proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially
significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has
been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
[] Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an
earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b)
have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the
proposed project, nothing further is required.
S{'~ff Evaluator
ERC Chairperson
18
Date '
June 26, 2002
Date
CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
June 26, 2002
As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure, adopted by the City Council
of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1983, as amended, the following described project
was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee of the City of Cupertino on
June 26, 2002.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
U-2002-03, EA-2002-05
crc Funding, LLC (Cupertino Town Center)
Cupertino Town Center (S.W. comer of Rodrigues and Torte
Avenues)
DISCRETIONARY ACTION REOUEST
Use Permit to demolish two office buildings (for a temporary parking lot) and construct a
28,000 square foot, two-story office building and a 2,500 square foot commercial building.
FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMrrrEE
The Environmental Review Committee recommends the granting of a Mitigated
Negative Declaration finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan and
has no significant environmental impacts. The recommendation for a Mitigated
Negative Declaration is subject to the following mitigations:
Traffic: The applicant shall contribute their proportionate share of the cost to
redesign the McClellan/De Anza signal to enable it to function more efficiently,
as described in the traffic report (page 42). The applicant's proportionate share
will equal the increment of new traffic added to the intersection compared to the
new traffic from the near term build-out in the surrounding area.
Secondly, the applicant will provide neighborhood traffic mitigation on
Rodrigues Avenue and Pacifica Drive. This mitigation will include traffic
calming measures such as on-street parking (to off-set parking deficiencies),
traffic curb-bulb-outs and/or traffic speed humps or other traffic mitigation
measures, as deemed appropriate, to offset the project traffic that will use these
two streets.
Environmental Review ~COmmittee
June 26, 2002
Page 2
Parking: On-street parking spaces must be provided along Torre Avenue to
implement the planned streetscape and offset on-site parking deficiencies. The
timing of the installation of the spaces will be contingent on the City's Civic
Plaza and Library project. Over the long term, if the master plan does not
proceed ahead, they must agree to provide the on-street spaces south of Town
Center Lane (labeled on the drawing as Civic Park Drive). Town Center Lane
must be aligned with the future plaza across the street.
Trees: The applicant will provide seventeen 48-inch box trees to compensate for
the removal of seventeen specimen trees and nineteen 24-inch box trees for a
total of third-six (36) new replacement trees.
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
G: Planning/erc/RECea200205
CITY OF CUPERTINO ~:'!:'i"~"~"
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
August 19, 2002
As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure adopted by the City Council of the
City of Cupertino on May 27, 1973, and amended on March 4, 1974, January 17 1977, May 1,
1978, and July 7, 1980, the following described project was granted a Mitigated Negative
Declaration by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on August 19, 2002.
PRO.IFCT Dlr.,gf~RIPTIf}N ANT} I ,OCATION
EA-2002-05
Application No.(s):
Applicant:
Location:
U-2002-03, EXC-2002-04
CTC Funding, LLC (Cupertino Town Center)
S.W. comer Rodrigues & Torre Avenues
DIRCI~FTIONAI~V ICTIf}N l~FQlrl*.gT
Use Permit to demolish two office buildings (for a temporary parking lot) and construct a
28,000 squ_are foot, two-story office building and a 2,500 square foot commercial building
Exception to the Heart of the City Specific Plan to increase the height of an office building
from 36' to 45'
The City Council granted a Mitigated Negative Declaration since the project is consistent with
the General Plan and there are no significant environmental impacts.
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
CFRTIFICITF OF TI-II?. CITy
This is to certify that the above Negative Declaration was filed in the Office of thc City Clerk
of the City of Cupertino on .2002.
City Clerk
g:/planning/em/ncgea200205
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torte Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
777-3308
AMEND~ MINUTES OF ~ REGULAR MEETING OF
PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON JULY 8, 2002
SALUTE TO ~ FLAG
ROLL CALL
Commissioners present:
Auerbadh Chen, Saadati and Wong
Commissioners absent: Corr
Staffpresent:
Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development; Aarti Shrivastava,
Senior Planner; Peter Gilli, Assistant Planner;, Eileen Murray, Assistant
City Attorney.
ViCe Chair Auerbach acted as Chairperson for the meeting.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
May 28, 2002 Regular Planning Commission meeting:
Com. Saadafi noted the following change to Paragraph 6, Page 2: Delete the word "the" and add
the word "for"
Com. Auerbach referred to Page 6, Paragraph 6, and commented that he was not just explaining
the process, but pointed out that the process of eliminating 2-80 was working well; that is the
General Plan amendment process.
MOTION:
SECOND:
ABSENT:
VOTE:
Com. Saadati moved to approve the May 28, 2002 Planning
Commission minutes as amended
Com. Wong
Com. Corr
Passed 4-0-0
WRITTEN CONIM-tJNICATIONS: Chair Auerbach noted receipt of a communication from the
Duke of Edinburgh restaurant relative to the use permit extension; and an e-mail communication
from Barbara Rogers relative to the recent Community Congress. A brief summary of the
communication from Barbara Rogers follows.
Ms. Rogers' communication summarized her thoughts and reactions to the 5/3/02 Community
Congress proceedings. She said it was a planning exercise that looked at how Cupertino might
develop in the next approximate 10 years with emphasis being on change in a particular direction
toward a perceived goal. She said they need to look ahead with all options open, remembering
that Cupertino is a real community with real people, whose lives are about to change for better or
worse. Ms. Rogers said she felt there was little opportunity to address any contrary aspect of the
/3"7
Planning CoIIlInlSSlOli Minutes 2 ':.' '?:' July 8, 2002
proposed suggestions, and it was difficult to get a fair hearing about anything contrary to what was
proposed. She wrote that she felt the reporting was slanted to omit those ideas contrary to the
deliverer's own and not those adopted by the group. She said that she felt the participants in the
congress were a discreet portion of the Cupertino community and a poll of all residents should be
taken using suggested guidelines contained in her summary. She emphasized that all people's
opinions should be considered in the best interest of the community.
POSTPONEMENTS/REMOVALS FROM C.z. LENDAR:
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
TM-2002-01
San Jose Water Land Company
East side of Sterling Boulevard, 60' northeast of Barnhart Avenue
Use permit to allow a child care facility in an existing quasi-public building.
Plannihg Commission decision final unless appealed
Request removal,from calendar
MOTION:
SECOND:
ABSENT:
VOTE:
Com. Saadati moved to postpone Application TM-2002-01
to the August 12, 2002 meeting
Com. Chen
Com. Corr
Passed 4-0-0
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
U-2002-04
Allen Wong (Keiki Place)
10931 Maxine Avenue
Use permit to allow a child care facility in an existing quasi-public building.
Planning Commission deciMon final unless appealed
Request removal from calendar
MOTION:
SECOND:
ABSENT:
VOTE:
Com. Chen moved to remove Application No. U-2002-04
from the calendar
Com. Wong
Com. Corr
Passed 4-0-0
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None
CONSENT C,~,I,F~NDAR: None
PUBLIC HEARING
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
TR-2002-04
Shabbir Nomanbhoy
11255 Mt. Crest Place
Tree removal permit to allow the removal of two Coast Live Oak trees.
Planning Commission decision final unless appealed
?lann/ng Commissi°fi' finutcs 3 July 8, 2002
.~taff pr~.~.ntation: lVlr. Peter GiIli, Associate Planner, reviewed the background of the application
to grant a tree removal permit for removal of two Coast Live Oak trees. He noted that staff visited
the site and felt that there was enough left of the trees to grow and thrive, although they would not
return to their original form. Mr. Gilli distributed a modified resolution, which was not
recommending approval of full removal, but recommending approving request to trim more than
25% of the canopy, which according to the municipal code, constitutes tree removal. He said that
staffhas spoken with the applicant and the applicant still believes the trees do need to be removed.
Staff recommends trimming of the two trees; and that two new trees be planted as noted on the
plan set to mitigate the trimming, but does not recommend complete removal of Trees A and B at
this time.
Mr. Gilli answered questions rehtive to the application. He said that relative to trimming the trees,
it is acceptable to trim portions of the tree if they are on the person's property line, but not to the
extent that they compromise the health of the tree. The city ordinance states that it cannot exceed
25% of the canopy. Relative to new projects that come forward with trees that are required to be
kept, Mr. Gilli said that a covenant is now on the property, so that when the property changes
hands, the new owner is aware that certain trees are protected trees and must be protected. He
noted the arborist reported that over 70% of the canopy of the trees had been removed. He said
that the ordinance was on the city website.
Ms. Ciddy Wordell, City Planner, said that they get calls from residents requesting if they can
remove a tree, but no calls to ask if they can trim trees.
Mr. Shabbir Nomanbhoy, applicant, said he was surprised with the change of recommendation.
He noted that the two arborists recommended complete removal of the trees, and the court
settlement indicated removal of the two'trees. He said the funds were in place and he did not see
the value in delaying the tree removal process. He pointed out that the two tree trunks were too
dose together and the branches were too large. He explained that the trees cut were growing into
his yard and overwhelming his tree.
Chair. Auerbach opened the meeting for public input; there was no one present who wished to
speak.
Com. Cben said she felt the homeowners need to be educated on the tree ordinances; and she
would support staff's recommendation to try to save the two trees as long as possible.
Com. Wong concurred with Com. Chen to save the trees, and said that it was important to educate
the residents of Cupertino using the Cupertino Scene and intemet to inform the public. He said he
supported staff's recommendation.
In response to Com. Saadati's question which tree, a 24" or 36" size would grow healthier, Mr.
Gilli said that it is felt that trees planted a smaller size in the beginning do better in the long run
because more of their growth and maturing has been at that site and not at a different site and then
transplanted. He said he supported saving the two trees since they have done well in the past year.
It was noted that the litigants in the matter were the former owners of the affected property. Mr.
Gilli said the language should cite that the new owner could request to have approval to remove
Planning Commissi0ii'Minutes 4 July 8, 2002
the two trees in the future if they provide documentation and clear evidence of failure and bad
health, and perhaps the bond would have to be held until that event occurred or some reasonable
period of time passed.
Chair Auerbach asked for the Planning Commission's opinion on giving the owner discretion
based on aesthetic reasons, if she felt they were too damaged.
Com. Chen said she felt it would be assurance to the future removal of the trees; but there be a
limited period of time and include it in the ordinance.
Mr. Gilli suggested that the removal of the trees should be reviewed by the Director of Community
Development with supporting evidence if it is not the desire to have the removal or the potential
future removal of these two trees come back to the Planning Commission.
Mr. Pi~secki said that the options were to allow removal of the trees at the applicant's discretion or
make the property owner go through a process to demonstrate that the trees are unhealthy and then
authorize staffto allow removal.
Com. Chen suggested a two year time period be given, and that the Planning Department staff
decide, unless something happens to the tree, otherwise after two years the bonds will be returned.
She suggested that the owner come back to the Planning Department and provide evidence that the
tree needs to be removed. Corns. Wong and Saadati concurred.
MOTION:
SECOND:
ABSENT:
VOTE:
Com. Chen moved to approve Application TR-2002-04 as proposed in the model
resolution with special provision added for the applicant provide the bonding, and
the bond be usable by the property owner; the amount listed in the estimate on 4-
12 is $1795.00; with review by Director of Community Development with
sufficient evidence to re'move the tree provided by the owner.
Com. Wong
Com. Con'
Passed 4-0-0
Application Nos.:
Applicant:
Location:
U-2002-03, EXC-2002-04, EA-2002-05
CTC Funding, LLC (Cupertino Town Center)
Cupertino Town Center (SW Corner of Rodrigues and
Torre Avenue)
Use permit to demolish two office buildings and construct a 28,00 square foot two-story office
building and a 2,500 square foot commercial building
Exception to Heart of the City Specific Plan to increase the height of an office building from 36' to
45'
Tentative City Council Date: August 5, 2002
Com. Wong excused himself from discussion of the application, as his family owns property at
20395 Pacifica Drive.
.qtnff pre~,.ntatlnn~ The video presentation reviewed the application for a use permit to construct a
new 28,000 square foot office building with a 46 car underground parking garage and 2,500
square feet of retail space at Rodrigues and Torte Avenues, and also demolition of two existing
Planning Commission Minutes s July 8, 2002
professional office buildings totaling 10,096 square feet and creating a temporary parking lot at
Cupertino Town Center. The application also includes an exception to height increase of an office
building from 36 feet to 4:5 feet. The proposal is a first phase of a master plan for a mixed use
development at the existing Town Center office complex. Staff recommends approval of the
application as a Heart of the City exception.
Ms. Aarti Shrivastava, Senior Planner, reviewed the background of the application, and noted that
the proposal was the fa-st phase of the master plan for a mixed use development. She said that in
response to neighbors' concerns, the current proposal was considerably scaled down from the
original proposal. She reviewed the Master Plan, Phase I Proposal, General Plan and Zoning, and
the Heart of the City Plan as outlined in the staff report. She then reviewed the architectural
design, traffic and circulation, parking, traffic analysis, tree removal, signage and utility issues, as
set forth in the staffreporC Conditions and recommendations on the various issues are outlined in
the staff report.
Ms. Jane Biersa, Fehr and Peers Associates, San Jose, answered questions on traffic impacts and
issues.
Mr. Ed Storm, applicant, asked that the focus be on the application for the 18,000 square feet of
office and 2,500 square feet of retail, which is not beyond the current zoning for the site. He
answered questions about the grading, the building height and bonding. He said he was opposed
to the requirement to put in 1,800 feet of sewer line for a 18,000 square foot building as
proportionally it did not make sense. Mr. Storm said they met with the Sanitary District and they
commented that the small project was appropriate without the extension; but if anything else were
done on the project, they would have to deal with the Sanitary District on the 1,800 linear feet of
sewer line on Wolfe Road. He said taking the scope of the project into consideration, it did not
seem appropriate to obligate them on that issue. He pointed out that he felt they should not be
obligated on the additional part being south of Town Center Lane, which was excessive
considering the relatively small project. He said they were in favor of the pedestrian paths as long
as the easement did not allow for public gathering on the property without some ability to control.
Mr. Storm said that they would hire a consultant to implement the Tra~'portation Demand
Management (TDM) plan and bring it to staff for their review, comment and approval. He said
they concurred with staff's recommendations except for the parking south of Town Center Lane
and the sanitary sewer extension; and that they were committed to some specific fees for some
studies and improvements needed in terms of traffic. Mr. Stone said they were not advocating a
retail concept, but more of a civic location tied to the library and city hail. He answered questions
relative to the building height and the small caf6 located within the project.
Discussion ensued relating to the temporary parking during demolition of the building. Mr. Stone
said he did not feel there would be sufficient parking with the elimination of the temporary parking
lot and it would cause concern from the neighbors relative to spillover parking, and he felt it was
important to contain parking within the site. He said that from a marketing convenience
standpoint, their tenants want to have onsite parking, making it a greenbelt or park area.
Mr. Piasecki said that an option to consider would be to take the interior portion of the parking lot,
and improve it when the parking demand shows it is needed. It could be bonded and held in
reserve and put into grass temporarily and then only when the parking demand shows it is needed,
take a third or half of it for the precise parking demand. It could also be short term parking, with
parking on the grass; or take a portion of it and set it aside as a parking reserve.
Planning CommissioPMmutes 6 ~.. July 8, 2002
Mr. Bill Hagman, architect, 1990 The. Alameda, San Jose; said that relative to Title 24, they would
meet all the city and state codes. Although no preliminary calculations have been done relative to
the energy load of the buildings, changes could be made if needed. He said various landscaping
features will be implemented to help with the shading of the building. Com. Auerbach
recommended leasing the carpeting and said that there was excellent Iow cost software available
from National Renewable Energys Lab relative to significantly reducing the mechanical loads, air
conditioning bills, and long term maintenance.
Chair Auerbach opened the meeting for public input.
Mr. Mark Peebles, 10166 Barbara Lane, said he lived in the Heart of the City, and liked the
design, smaller size, two stories, and sloped roof. He expressed concern that the Cupertino Union
School',District was considering making Rodrigues and Torre Avenues the safe path to school for
student~ coming from the DeAnza area. He said nothing had been addressed relative to the width
of the sidewalks and he was concerned because students were not permitted to ride their bicycles
on the sidewalks. He said the traffic was getting tighter and he was apprehensive about diagonal
or any other kind of parking along that street, which would be heavily used by students. Mr.
Peebles said that the goal was to have a walkable city, and if some of the drafts proposed by the
Cupertino Union School District go through, it will be heavily trafficked by young adults. Relative
to the comment about McClellan and DeAnza and DeAnza and Stevens Creek not being
pedestrian friendly, he urged that pedestrian friendly intersections be made a priority, particularly
for the younger population.
Mr. Dennis Whitaker, 20622 Cheryl Drive, congratulated Mr. Hunter and Mr. Storm for their
work with the community. He commended their excellent job on downsizing, alleviating fears of
high rises, cutting occupancy in half, which he said was a concern of his. He expressed concern
about the heavy flow of traffic on PacifiCa and Rodrigues, especially with the heavy student use of
the streets if the school district restructured.
Mr. Deke Hunter, co-applicant, said that getting the children to school is a priority in his family
also and he understood the concerns expressed. He said that as applicants they try to balance the
traffic related questions and solutions proposed by public works as well as matching those up
against community related issues. He emphasized their commitment to the community, which he
felt was exhibited by the changes in this plan and those for the subsequent master plan; and said
they would continue their commitment to help improve the traffic flow whether it be for on-street
parking or for wider bike lanes if the community decides they want one over the other. He
emphasized that they would take into consideration the comments from the community and take
the lead from the Planning Commission on which is the more appropriate path to follow.
Chaff Auerbach closed the public hearing.
Com. Chen said she felt it was a well planned and well designed project, and said she supported
the project.
Com. Saadati said he preferred the sloped roof over the fiat roof; and said it was tasteful and
consistent with the surroundings. He questioned ifstaffhad any discussion with the school district
relative to the pedestrian use of the streets. Mr. Piasecki said that they were aware that the school
district was restructuring and that there would be the need for more of the streets to be used as
Planning Commission Minutes 7 :'" July 8, 2002
access to the schools. He explained that the intent behind having automobiles parked is a safety
measure for pedestrians and is a new urbanist principle being widely touted rather than having
streets basically free for-ails for the 'car and no side friction or impediments to the automobile
travelling quickly. He said it was advantageous to have on-street parking. The bike lane will
presumably be striped providing a safer route for cyclists; which was the thought behind the
concept of trying to slow the automobile and prioritize the pedestrian and bicycle movements.
Com. Saadati said he liked the project and was hopeful it would proceed as soon as possible.
Chair Auerbach said that he was conflicted with the project. He said he did not feel the project has
been presented to the Planning Commission as a master plan project, although in many minds it is
the concept of the comprehensive master plan of the area. He said on one hand, the property
owners have the right to develop their property; but on the other hand have a special obligation on
the part of the people who do large developments, because it naturally forecloses on smaller more
organic' development to pay special attention to the whole design. He said contrary to what has
been discussed, although the Planning Commission has not seen the master plan, this project will
set the entire tone and flavor for the entire project. In some prior instances the Planning
Commission has either demanded to see the entire project and felt that would be a better approach,
or said no, that the concentration needs to be on the particular proposal. Chair Auerbach said that
he felt it was ironic that to build a home in Cupertino greater than 35% FAR, the applicant has to
put up story poles to provide an indication of what the project would look like in terms of height
and width in reality. He said the equivalent for developers of larger projects should be to provide
three dimensional renderings or scale models of the developments so that the entire project can be
visualized with the surrounding development. Chair Auerbach said his preference would be to
continue the item until the whole master plan is seen, to provide a better idea of what is being
considered as part of the whole project, including the pedestrian walkways through the plan, and
get a better sense of having the applicant address the issue of the implications of the children
walking to and from schools.
Com. Chen said that she agreed it would be good to see the master plan in the model.
Com. Saadati said that the plan reflects some of the master plan, but he felt they had the right to
approve the balance of the project, and based on what was shown, it appears that it can fit, and the
traffic issues and other elements will be created not as a result of this part, but a result of the whole
construction. He suggested moving forward with the plan and relook at the master plan and other
aspects of the plan for any development beyond the present plan. He said he was not certain it
would have that significant an impact on the overall project.
Chair Auerbach emphasized that it is an important comer and he felt it will set the tone for the ,
whole project and until it is decided whether the whole project is suitable or not, he was
uncomfortable committing to a small portion.
Com. Saadati said he has dealt with projects that don't have master plans and over years it was not
very effective piecemealing the project.
Mr. Piaseckl said that as indicated earlier, the applicants intend to come in on the heels of the
application with the master plan, possibly 30 to 60 days, and if asked to present the level of detail
that Chair Auerbach is describing, it may take more time to put that master plan together. He said
it was visualized that it is a big empty parking lot now and the things that are going to potentially
Planning Commissi°fi'"~¢linutes
s July 8, 2002
change from the Planning Commission's perspective might be the height, and/or the use, whether
it would it be a different use other than office and retail in this particular property. Mr. Piasecki
said that staff felt comfortable that given its placement that it has minimal detrimental effect. It
creates a tone for materials which are already consistent with what is out there; to some degree
massing, of which the people are saying they prefer the lower massing; it doesn't change the
outcome for the master plan in terms of the residential on the building to the south and further up
the mixed use building fronting on DeAnza Boulevard which could potentially also be residential
or park.
Chair Auerbach said from his vantage point, as already heard, the whole vision of the space has
changed from an ersatz town center to something that is more potentially an upgrade of what is
there now. Mr. Piasecki said that in the original master plan concept, there was a limited amount
of retail; the buildings were bigger with more massing to the buildings which might have created a
sense of enclosure, but the land use options for retail were identical.
Mr. Storm said that they did not want to be penalized for being proactive about what their plans
were for the bigger picture. He said that discussing the bigger picture will be a long drawn out
process because of the size of the project. He stressed the importance of getting approval to start
the project and begin working on the run down property and having something to present to
tenants. He pointed out that the smaller building is tied to the big project, and their ability to do
anything in the interim with the project would be slowed down. He said his choice would be to
have action taken now rather than wait for the big project to come back.
Mr. Piasecki said that it is the applicant's vision that the project is going to be a coordinated
master plan with a mixture of land uses; and he felt the original concept that this was somehow
more than a mixed use development was probably incorrect. He pointed out that it was not going
to be a town center as it does not have enough critical mass in 30,000 square feet of commercial to
create a town center. He said he felt it Was advantageous to have the longer range vision, although
a little fiJ~3', but the applicant has put a lot of effort last year in developing the concepts and some
of the material is in the meeting packets. He said he was comfortable in proceeding with the plan
and felt it would not change the rest of the plan.
MOTION:
SECOND:
ABSENT:
VOTE:
Com. Saadati moved to approve the mitigated negative
declaration on Application EA-2002-05
Com. Chert
Corns. Corr, Wong
Passed 3 -0-0
MOTION:
SECOND:
ABSENT:
VOTE:
Com. Chen moved to approve the Heart of the City exception,
Application EXC-2002-04 subject to the model resolution
Com. Saadati
Corns. Corr, Wong
Passed 3 -0-0
MOTION:
SECOND:
Com. Saadati moved to approve the use permit application
accordance with the model resolution and additional Condition 17
Com. Chert
U-2002-03 in
Planning Commission Minutes 9 July 8, 2002
In response to Chair Auerbach's question relative to the 1800 feet of sewer line, Ms. Shrivastava
explained that the condition stated it was standard for a number of projects, and some review by
the Sanitary District is still required. She said the applicant met with the Sanitary District and they
indicated there would be enough capacity to be able to build Phase I. ^ letter is needed from the
Sanitary District indicating their approval. She said that it was also addressed that if in fact it
needed necessary improvements, those be made.
She reiterated that no bond was required, just compliance with the Sanitary District. Mr. Piasecki
said that it was desirable to get the letter of approval from the Sanitary District before the City
Council meeting so that the Council would have the input knowing how relevant the condition is
or the concern of the applicants.
Mr. Piasecki. said the applicant raised an issue with Condition 9b. Staff's concern is that it may
result in a half- finished frontage in the event they do not proceed with the master plan, and that
they should at least complete it along their frontage, not someone else's property
Chair Auerbach said that his objection was that he felt the city should be doing these kind of
improvements. He proposed to leave the demolition of the buildings as grassy area and pave as
needed.
Mr. Piasecki illustrated the parking lot and suggested the possibility of taking a portion or all of
the interior portion of the parking area and setting it in reserve and ask'that the applicant put lawn
down for the interim period, and then open up whatever portion of that is needed al[er the building
is built and the parking demand is known. The applicant would not have to put a lot of money into
something they are going to tear up in the near future, and from staff's view, there would not be
overpaying where not needed. He said it would be a function of market conditions and whether
there is high demand for office space in this development.
Chaff Auerbach pointed out that as s~en from the traffic analysis, that although the tools are
scientific, the difference in actual use could be significant and he was not in favor of putting down
a lot of asphalt which would be destined to be dug up.
Mr. Piasecki said for short periods of time decomposed granite could be used, although it is a hot
surface and unattractive.
Chair Auerbach suggested an amendment to include bonding; and Condition 7 be amended to
reflect design of the temporary parking lot to provide parking around the perimeter with
landscaping to be approved by the Director of Community Development, and for the center to be
paved as needed to accommodate additional parking demand.
Coms. Saadafi and Chen accepted the amendments.
Mr. Piasecki said that the bulbouts and restrictors could be put in the condition as well; the concept
was to have unrestricted bicycle movement with two travel lanes and a parking lane.
Chair Auerbach said that he was also concerned with some of the other traffic features installed in
terms of the design aesthetic; and suggested revising Item 11 to add the amendment that the design
of flow restrictors and other traffic calming measures for this development shall come before the
Planning Commission for approval.
Planning Commission Minutes lo July 8, 2002
Corns. Saadati and Chon accepted the amendments.
ABSENT: Corns. Con' and Wong
VOTE: Passed 3-0-0
Mr. Piasecki noted that the item would be presented to the City Council on August 19th meeting.
Com. Wong returned to the meeting.
OLD BUSINESS: None
NEWBUSIN SS: None
REPORT O1' TIlE PLANNING COMMISSION
Envirohmental Review Committee: Chair Corr was unable to attend the last meeting. Mr.
Piasecki noted that the only item on the agenda was the Town Center development.
]lousing Committee: Com. Chen said that she did not receive ample notice to attend the last
meeting. She noted that she would attend the meeting on July 11th.
Mayor's Breakfast: Chair Auerbach reported on the discussions held at the recent Mayor's
breakfast, including the placement of the five sculptures throughout the city; Stevens Creek trails,
library report, telecommunications committee report.
Chair Auerbach reported on his attendance at the Riparian Renaissance Conference.
Chair Auerbach reported on his attendance at the recent American Solar Energy Conference. He
suggested as part of the environmental section of the General Plan update to question if the
building codes recognize improvements, being made from passive means to allow the reduction of
active means. Chair Auerbach requested that the following verbatim report be included for the
record:
"Background:
The American Solar Energy Society, ASES, is a member of the International Solar Energy
Society, ISES. I attended their 25th conference held in Sparks, Nevada June 16 through June 20th.
It was the first time I had attended; I have been a member of the local chapter, the Northern
California Solar Energy Association for 6 months, and I recently became a member of ASES.
It was a fascinating show. While the local chapters are mostly occupied with events such as the
annual solar home tour, ASES is the meeting place of leading scientists from major universities
from all over the world as well as leading scientific institutions in the United States, such as
Sandia National Label, Lawrence Berkeley Labs, Department of Energy, National Center for
Photovoltaics, Interstate Renewable Energy Council, and the National Renewable Energy
Laboratory.
The plenary session speakers include& David Garman, Assistant Secretary for Energy and
Efficiency and Renewable Energy at the DOE; Larry Kazmerski, Director of the National Center
for Photovoltaics; Amory Lovins, CEO of the Rocky Mountain Institute; Paul Mcready, Time
Magazine's Engineer of the Century, and the "Father of: Human-Powered Flight"; William
McDonough, architect and advocate for sustaining design, and author of "Cradle to Cradle."
Planning Commission Minutes l~ July 8, 2002
Y/hat I learned relevant to city planning:
Solar panel (PV) technology is real, available and sensible. Per kWh it is still more expensive than
grid power, but given a system's 20 year life expectancy, and adjusting the price for risk of grid
power, buying power that will not fluctuate in price for that period may be a very sensible thing to
do. Even at today's energy prices, a system may pay for itself in as little as 10 years. The State of
California is offering a significant rebate on system installs; but independent of economic
considerations if one wants to help reduce the carbon dioxide emissions and reduce global
warming; if you want to help America create an energy system that is more secure and less
dependent, then you should choose solar.
And if the story on solar is good, the story on wind is even better. Today electricity from wind
turbines is being produced at between 3 and 4 cents a kWh. That is competitive with today's
energy 'prices; if you have wind you have wind power.
Let's not forget passive solar. Passive solar de~iign is simple, effective, and requires no electronics
to reduce energy consumption. The principles are simple: (a) face the broad portion of the house
to the south; (b) Allow winter sunlight to strike some thermal mass such as a concrete or tile floor
or stone wall; (c) Ventilate heat during the summer days; (d) Allow captured winter sun to radiate
during winter nights.
There are several excellent design tools to model this. Among the best for small buildings and
homes was Energy-10, a soRware program developed by the National Renewable Ener~, Labs
and available for $250 including a 2-day course on how to use it. This product has been
successfully used in the field to model homes and reduce the need for additional cooling or
heating.
According to some of the suppliers and builders I spoke with, the major issue with cities is that
they don't know enough about various types of solar systems. There was the story of one
inspector in an unnamed town that shook one of the PV conduit pipes to see if it had water in it. It
didn't and he passed it. In the case of OM, they said that most cities simply ignore the heating and
cooling capacity of the passive system, and thus require that larger than needed heating and
cooling systems go in the home. These may be installed for inspection and then removed for
actual use.
Some Questions to Ask.'
Is Cupertino in the buildings it owns or is planning, such as the new library or sports center,
renovation doing enough to minimize manufactured energy use, and maximize the use of natural
energy sources?
Is Cupertino ensuring that homes and buildings are oriented to the south and taking advantage of
solar access? For example, when we approved the awnings on the Kimpton Hotel, were they more
or less shading than is required to maximize the solar potential?
Is Cupertino requiring new homes and buildings to provide energy analysis as a standard part of
budding approval?
Planning Commission Minutes 12 July 8, 2002
Does Cupertino encourage builders of homes and offices to consider energy efficiency in new
buildings, and are we able to properly account for the reduced heating and cooling loads in
reduced conventional I-IVAC equipment, and able to properly and in a timely fashion inspect these
types of systems?
Is Cupertino encouraging builders to eliminate products that are known human toxins such as
formaldehyde, arsenic, chromium from building materials?
Do new Cupertino homes have sufficient, open south facing roof area that can support solar PV
and/or solar hot water?
Has Cupertino eliminated the use of wood preserved with arsenic from city construction of fences,
decks and playgrounds?
Does Cupertino require that new office buildings have windows that open?
As a matter of security in an emergency, does Cupertino require that emergency and essential
services run on distributed systems such as solar?
Will Cupertino continue with its fleet of electric vehicles and extend its commitment by installing
PV to charge these vehicles?
As a matter of policy, does Cupertino regularly support initiatives before the PUC, the county or
the state that would encourage renewables initiatives such as net metering and the California buy-
down programs?
Will Cupertino plan to send a representative to future ASES conferences?
Exhibits: OM Book; Energy-10 handout; Program from the 2002 ASES Conference".
(End of Verbatim report from Com. Auerbach)
REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMXINITY DEVI~LOPMENT: Mr. Piasecki said
that the Planning Commission needed to designate Com. Con' as an alternate to accompany Com.
Saadati at the next DRC meeting. He reminded the Planning Commission of the August 19th joint
study session with the City Council to review the VTA Best Practices Program.
MOTION:
SECOND:
ABSENT:
VOTE:
Com. Saadati moved to designate Com. Con' as an alternate on the DRC.
Com. Wong
Com. Corr
Passed 4-0-0
DISCUSSION OF NEWSPAPER CLWPINGS: None
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m. to the Planning Commission meeting
at 6:45 p.m. on August 12, 2002.
Respectfully Submitted,
Planning Commissi~i~i~inutcs ~3
July 8, 2002
Approved as amended: August 12, 2002
Elizabeth Ellis
Recording Secretary
EXHIBIT C -Sheet 1
Cit~ l~.a?
Line up with Sheet 2
by overlapping traffic
calming improvement
centerline
~50 0 50 100 Feet
EXHIBIT C - Sheet 2
Line up with Sheet 1
by overlapping traffic
calming improvement
centerline
Regnart Creek
50
50
100 Feet
EAST ELEVATION
WEST ELEVATION
CIVIC PARK PHASE ONE
CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
~IORTH ELEVATION BUILDING G
NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING R1
(3UTH ELEVATION BUILDING G
SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING R1
CIVIC PARK PHASE ONE
CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
USE PERMIT APPLICATION
CiViC PARK PHASE ONE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
PROJECT SUMMARY:
TA~BLE OF CONTENTS
NEW TWO STORY OFFICE BUILDING OVER A
ONE LEVEL BELOW GRADE PARKING STRUCTURE.
NEW ONE STORY RESTAURANT BUILDING WITH
INTEGRAL OPEN AIR PLAZA.
DEMOLITION OF TWO 5000 SF. OFFICE BUILDINGS
AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW TEMPORARY
PARKING LOT AT THAT LOCATION.
VICINITY MAP
.__ii NORTH II~
I
iL_
A.P.N.: 369~,0-017, 002
SITE: 47,091 SF. (1.09 ACRES +)
BUILDING AREAS:
BUILDING G: 28,000 SF f
BUILDING R1: 2,500 SF ~
BUILDING 4 & 5 DEMOLISHED: 10,000 SF t
PARKING REQUIRED: BUILDING G ONLY 66 SPACES
100% OFFICE = 28,000 SF. 1285 SF. = + 98 SPACES
DEMOLISH BUILDING 4 & 5,10,000 SF. 1285 SF. = - 35 SPACES
TOTAL SITE PARKING REQUIRED: 766 SPACES
703 EXISTING SPACES +66 SPACES FOR BUILDING G
PARKING PROVIDED: 752 SPACES
SEE PARKING PLAN SHEET P-lo
0
L1
L2
L3
L4
C1
C2
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
P1
P2
MP
CiViC PARK PHASE QNE
CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
TITLE SHEET
OVERALL SiTE PLAN
SITE PLAN BUILDINGS G / R1 & TEMP. PARKING
LANDSCAPE PLAN BUILDINGS G / R1 & TEMP. PARKING
LANDSCAPE MATERIALS
PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN BUILDINGS G / R1
PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN TEMP. PARKING
1ST FLOOR PLANS
LOWER LEVEL / 2ND FLOOR PLANS
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
BUILDING ELEVATIONS
BUILDING SECTIONS
PARKING PLAN
PERMEABILITY PLAN
MASTER PLAN / FOR REFERENCE ONLY
IL-I
~O-Ot-9 IO0lO
NV-El ALIS 'TTVI:I~AO
I
I
VINt:IO-II-IVO ' ONI.Lt:F::ldrlO
:::INO :::ISVH~ >ll:lVel 01^10
Ot ONI(TIIA8
80NIG'lin8
¥
Ox uoi$ IL)
I I
L_J
L
,I 9NIO'lln8
6 ONiQ']I~8
-- I
Z ONlO'lln8
'1 ONiQ"IIrIG
-i
I
r 1
L L____, J
TREE SURVEY LEGEND"'
SITE LEGEND*
Il
BUILDING B
LIMIT OF WORK
I '
srrE PLAN- BLI~GS G, R-1 & TEbI~ORARY P.~G
CIVIC PARK PHASE ONE
CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
1"=20'-0"
02001
6-10-02
L2
70-0[-9 ~,00~'0 .O-,O~=.t
~gkDtb'Vd AI:IVI:IOdltELL ~ L-Ii ~
VINEIO-.II-IVO ' ONIJ.EI3dI'IO
:I_NO :::ISVHd NJ:IVd OIAIO
!
30N3A¥ 3~01
(:~)
O ONlagln8
PLANTING
'1REES:
OAK ON SITE JAPANESE
MAPLE
SHRUBS:
FLAX LAVENDER
GROUND COVER/ V~NES:
GAZANIA DWARF
PERIWINKLE
FURNISHINGS
SMITH & HA~EN
FOREST GREEN
LARGE OCTAGON UMBRELLA
G621540
LANDSCAPE FORMS, INC.
RECEPTACLE SIDE-OPENING
SC-5002-24-35
LANDSCAPE FORMS, INC.
RECEPTACLE ~TH ASH PAN
SC-5002-24-35
QUICK CRETE
PRECAST CONCRETE PLANTER
MESA ROUND- ~ QR-MS2422P
24" TOP OUTSIDE DIA, 22' HIGH
COLOR LATTEC-3
OUICK CRETE
PRECAST CONCRETE PLANTER
ROUND URN- ~QR-URN2733P
27" TOP OUTSIDE DIA, 35" HIGH
COLOR LATTEC-3
Pt. ANE ]'REE
YEU. OW
DAYULY
LANTANA
CAPITAL PEAR
TREE
CAMELLIA
POTATO ~NE
CO~T uvE
OAK
FEATHER
GRASS
WATER LILY
REDWOOD
SOCEITY BIRD OF CANNA ULY
GARLIC PARADISE
LAVENDER STAR LILAC VINE
FLOWER
BENCHES
LANDSCAPE FORMS. INC.
SCARBOROUGH BACKED
STRAP BENCH-IVY POWDERCOAT
SC300$-BS- 72
LANDSCAPE FORMS, INC,
SCARBOROOGH BACKLESS
STRAP BENCH-IVY POWI)ERCOAT
SC3005- FS- 72
WATER FEATURES
EXAMPLES OF POSSIBLE
WATER FEATURES
MOVEABLE
CHAIRS
TABLES
PAVING
PEDESTRIAN PA~'IND
COLORED CONCRETE: DAVIS COLORS-
MOCHA (1 L.B. 6058) & COCOA (2LBS.
el 30)
SAND-BLAST FINI~H
CONCRETE BANDS:
NO COLOR, SAND-BLAST FINISH
SMITH & HAW~EN
GREEN TOBCANA ARMCHAIRS
0549402
SMITH z~ HAWKEN
GREEN SALERNO TABLE
G547018
CRICKET GREEN SIDECHAIR . 3 5'
AFOO§7
CRICKET GREEN R~ND TABLE 3 D
AFO118
CIVIC PARK PHASE ONE
CUPERTINO , CALIFORNIA
I.AI~SCAF~ MA~S
6-10-02
L4
,.0
[0 -0 t - g LO0[O .0 -.0[ = . [
VINI:IO-.II'IVO ' ONIJ. aFIdnO
~NO ':lgVHd ),ll:lVd OIAIO
....... F,-..--~-, TE RY PARKING- 185 SPA ES
"': ......
CIVIC PARK PHASE ONE
CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
x
KIER & WRIGHT
CIVIL ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS, INC.
3350 Scott Bou!evard, Building 22 (408)727-6665
Santa Clara, California 95054 FAX (408)727-5641
1"=20"-0° 02001 6-10-02
C2
,V
~0 -0~.-9 &O0[O .0 -,0 t =. t
~ ~ / I=IO0'L-I .I.81.
VIN~OdI~VO ' ONl~3dnO
=INO :ISVHd )il:lVd OIAIO
0
rn
rn
W
MO]3B ~00~ NV.4
· 4S O00'g~ 4:
9Nla'llnB 301:1:10 A~OIS OMJ.
9 9NlQglI3B
~-{ ', ~;. :i I 'JS 00~'~ :1:
]' \ '"']' \:'~ ~;i iNvanvl~uxaoisaNO
j '., . ~ i I.-B 9NIOqlnB
~ 6',.6' j
136'.9'
47 PARKING SPACES
164',0'
LOWER LEVEL PARK~G PLAN
LOWER LEVEL PARKIdG / SECOND FLOOR PLAN
CIVIC PARK PHASE ONE,
CUPERTINO , CALIFORNIA
1"=10'-0" 02001 6-10-O2
A2
~V
b'~IOI.LYA_~
VINIdO_-II'IVO ' ONl.La~ldno
EINO EI~VHd ~lblVd OIAIO
NOliVA~3q Hi'OS
9NIO'llnB :lOIJJO NOLLVA.-:g93 HiBON
EAST ELEVATION RESTAURANT
EAST ELEVATION OFFICE BUILDING
WEST ELEVATION OFFICE BUILDING
WEST ELEVATION RESTAURANT
CIVIC PARK PHASE ONE
CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
A4
BNOLLO~B 9MG'Bf19
VINIdO_-II"IVO ' ONI.Lt:F~dnO
=INO =ISVHd )lt:lVd OIAIO
OO NOU. O~
'3AV ~aao±
8;] NOLLO~B
'3AV 3BBO±
W NOU.OBS
'3AV S31"Ig~JOOB
..... .=J
DE ANZA BOULEVARD
._...-- ,- ................................................ :: ~ ~
1
L'-'Z ......................
SURFN~E PARKING:
SURFACE STANDARD 67'% 472
- / j%,
BUILDING ?
BUILDING g
._;::¢ - [.[~,~,,
BUILDING A
SUILOING B
F ............. 71
, ,, (E) ,,
', '-.._B_ANK _,/ ',
II // (1 STORY) \x I
BUILDING G
i
TORRE AVENUE
.....................................
CIVIC PARK PHASE ONE
CUPERTINO , CALIFORNIA
02OO1
PARK~G PLAN
6--10--02
P1
~O-Ot-9 !.00~0
.0 -.OE =. ~
VINblO-II-IVO ' ONll~dno
:INO :ISVHd ~Vd OIAIO
ON:lO:II ilil]gVB~Bd
/
..//
NC'Id g.U~ L-II ~ IB
F---1
L_-J
I I L_.J
I I
· JI
1
F- 1
1
F I
FT]
I I I
L"iL
L
J
r -i
B~ D,~, D
STORY)
I
I I I I I I I I
------1
L__J
TORRE AVENUE
BLDG MOR
(a s~oR¥)
I(E/I
L_J
G-2
(3 LEVEL ABOVE GRADE,
LEVEL BELOW GRADE)
BLDG F/
(~ S~ORY)
BLDC R./G- 4
(3 STO~¥)
~i'~'TF~G'--N X
(~ r'~ II / LJBRAR? x, ,. ....... '-,-. ,.
CIVIC PARK MASTERPLAN
CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA
>=B. AN K_<
I - I
(E) BLDG A
(2 STORY)
.... B~-,.. U ~',
:, ~.:. ) , I FTM,"
(2 STORY)
BLDG G/C-1
(2 STORY)
EXISTING
PLaN F(J~ F
1'--40'-0" 02001
®®
k
MR
6-10-02
CITY OF
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
FAX (408) 777-3333
Community Development Department
Agenda Item No.: O~___~
Summary
Agenda Date: September 16, 2001
Application No.:
Applicant:
Property Owner:
Location:
MCA-2001-04, EA-2002-10
City of Cupertino
Various
City-wide
Application Summary:
AMENDMENTS to Chapter 19.84 of the Cupertino Municipal Code and other sections of the code,
if needed, related to changes to Second Dwelling Unit regulations.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Grant a negative declaration (EA-2002-10).
2. Conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. __
3. Approve application MCA-2001-04.
BACKGROUND:
As part of the Cupertino General Plan update, on the Housing Element implementation programs
stated the city of Cupertino would evaluate and, if necessary, revise the Second Dwelling Unit
Ordinance to encourage more second dwelling units. The Planning Commission reviewed the
proposed amendments to Chapter 19.84 of the Cupertino Municipal Code on August 26, 2002 and
agreed with the staff recommendation. The staff report detailing the amendments to the Second
Dwelling Unit ordinance has been attached for background information. Essentially, the
amendments result in larger second dwelling units on the larger lots in Cupertino, the possibility of
having a detached unit on any size lot, and no additional parking spaces being required on lots
meeting the city's minimum parking requirements.
Prepared by: Vera Gil, Senior Planner
APPR D MITTAL:
Steve PiasecRi
Director of Community Development
SUBMITTED BY:
David W. Knapp
City Manager
Enclosures: Ordinance No.
Red-lined Chapter 19.84 of the Cupertino Municipal Code
Planning Commission Resolution No. 6154
Planning Commission report dated August 26, 2002
Negative Declaration
Initial Study
Printed on Recycled Paper
DRAFT
Proposed text is underlined. Deleted text appears in strike-through.
ORDINANCE NO. 1901
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
AMENDING CHAPTER 19.84, SECOND DWELLING UNITS IN R-l, RHS, A AND
A-1 ZONES, OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Chapter 19.84 of the Municipal Code of Cupertino is hereby amended to read as
follows:
19.84.020 Applicabili _ty of regulations.
Notwithstanding any provision of this title to the contrary, a second dwelling unit is
permitted on lots in R-I, RHS, A and A-1 zoning districts, provided that in addition to
complying with the site development regulations specified in those districts for
dwelling units, such second dwelling unit complies with the regulations contained in
this chapter and Chapter 19.80, Accessory Building/Structures.
19.84.030 Site development regulations.
A) A second dwelling unit located on a lot containing less than ten thousand square
feet must be attached to the principal dwelling and integrated therewith except ~,~ A
d~,~ ..... m .... t ~, ~:.~ in any residential zoning district, if the second
dwelling unit meets the Architectural review criteria described in section 19.84.060.
B) All second dwelling units shall have direct outside access without going through the
principal dwelling.
C) All accesses to secondary units shall be screened from a public street.
D) The gross building area of a second dwelling unit shall not exceed
squarc fcct the following square footage of living space, exclusive of decks and
garages:
1) On lots of 10,000 square feet or greater, the second dwelling unit shall not exceed
800 square feet.
2) On lots less than 10,000 square feet, the second dwelling unit shall not exceed 640'
square feet.
F-) E_) A second dwelling unit may be located on a second story, provided that:
Ordinance No. 1901
~,, ....... Op:P.'.OP. .......................... .,, ...... ,t.' ....... , ....................
3) T~- ;o ,,~1.,,,,1.,,-,,-1 ~.-, ;-t,,-, ..,..; ....... ;,-1 .... /{'~,.,.1 1@11 /..,.....~-% 1000. ("~..,.1 1/-,~1 C',,T-, .A
1) It is attached to the primary, residence; and
2) Entry to the second dwelling unit is not provided by an exterior staircase; and
3) In the opinion of the Director of Communi .ty Development, the second unit does
not result in privacy intrusion to adjoining dwellings.
19.84.040 Off-Street Parking.
.................. 1""°'"'~'~
°1" ........ 1"
If the principal dwelling unit has less than the minimum off-street parking spaces for
the applicable residential zoning district in which it is located, as described in Chapter
19.100, Parking Regulations, then one additional off-street parking space shall be
provided.
19.84.070 Nonconforming and illegal second dwelling units.
A) A second dwelling which was constructed prior to the enactment by the City of any
ordinance which regulates second dwellings in R-l, RHS, A or A-1 zoning districts
but which was constructed in conformance with applicable site development and
building code regulations in effect at the time of construction is governed by the
provisions of Chapter 19.108, Nonconforming Uses and Facilities.
B) Illegal Second Units. A second dwelling, which was constructed without a building
permit or in conflict with the applicable site development or building regulations at
the time of construction, may only be permitted upon the owner of such a unit
obtaining approval of the Design Review Committee, based upon the Architectural
review criteria stated in section 19.84.060. a condi.~.-o:'.a! '.:'~c per.mdt izz-.:'cd ~y thc
Ordinance No. 1901
INTRODUCED at a regular adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 16th day of September, 2002, and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Cupertino this day of , 2002,
by the following vote:
Vote
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN
Members of the City Council
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
Chapter 19.84 SECOND DWELLING UNITS IN R-I, RHS, A,
AND A-1 ZONES
19.84.010 Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to promote the goal of affordable housing within the City
through provision of additional housing in certain residential and agricultural zoning.
districts, which would otherwise be prohibited in those districts, in a manner which
minimizes adverse impacts to neighborhoods.
19.84.020 Applicabili _ty of regulations.
Notwithstanding any provision of this title to the contrary, a second dwelling unit is
permitted on lots in R-l, RHS, A and A-1 zoning districts, provided that in addition to
complying with the site development regulations specified in those districts for dwelling
units, such second dwelling unit complies with the regulations contained in this chapter
and Chapter 19.80, Accessory_ Building/Structures.
19.84.030 Site development regulations.
A) A second dwelling unit located on a lot containing less than ten thousand square feet
must be attached to the principal dwelling and integrated therewith except an A and
s,~,,, in any residential zoning district, if the second dwelling
unit meets the Architectural review criteria described in section 19.84.060.
B) All second dwelling units shall have direct outside access without going through the
principal dwelling.
C) All accesses to secondary units shall be screened from a public street.
D) The gross building area of a second dwelling unit shall not exceed six hvmdrcd forty
.,,~,.,..,. ....... .,.,.,;^^~ the following square footage of living space, exclusive of decks and
garages:
1) On lots of 10,000 square feet or greater, the second dwelling unit shall not exceed
800 square feet.
2) On lots less than 10,000 square feet, the second dwelling tmit shall not exceed 640
square feet.
........... : r ................ area.
F-) E)A second dwelling unit may be located on a second story, provided that:
1. It is attached to the primary residence; and
2. Entry. to the second dwelling unit is not provided by an exterior staircase; and
3. In the opinion of the Director of Communi .ty Development, the second unit does
not result in privacy, intrusion to adjoining dwellings.
19.84.040 Off-Street Parking.
................. 1-' ...... ,1~ '" "' '-1 ................... 1" 1"' ............. ,1~ ............ .t" .........
0 ~ ......................... *' .~ ...... 1" .......' ...................................
.... 1" .............. o .... y .... ,.- ......... 2' 1" ....... "' ........................
If the principal dwelling unit has less than the minimum off-street parking spaces for the
applicable residential zoning district in which it is located, as described in Chapter 19.100,
Parking Regulations, then one additional off-street parking space shall be provided.
19.84.060 Architectural review.
Prior to issuance of a building permit for a second dwelling unit, the Director of
Community Development shall review the architecture of the proposed dwelling and shall
determine:
A) That the design of the proposed second dwelling unit is consistent with the
architecture of the principal dwelling;
B) That the building materials of the proposed second unit are compatible with the
materials, color and textures of the principal dwelling;
C) That the proposed second dwelling unit will not require excessive grading which is
visible from a public street or adjoining private property.
19.84.070 Nonconforming and illegal second dwelling units.
A) A second dwelling which was constructed prior to the enactment by the City of any
ordinance which regulates second dwellings in R-l, RHS, A or A-1 zoning districts but
which was constructed in conformance with applicable site development and building
code regulations in effect at the time of construction is governed by the provisions of
Chapter 19.108, Nonconforming Uses and Facilities.
B) Illegal Second Units. A second dwelling, which was constructed without a building
permit or in conflict with the applicable site development or building regulations at the
time of construction, may only be permitted upon the owner of such a unit obtaining
approval of the Design Review Committee, based upon the Architectural review
criteria stated in section 19.84.060. a ~.-11~-I~--~1 ........ ~. ; ..... .-1 1..., ~-1.,~ 1~I,~4.~, hi
MCA-2001-04
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 6154
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND CHAPTERS 19.84 OF THE
CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE CONCERNING SECOND DWELLING UNITS.
Recommendation of approval is based on Exhibit A as amended.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 26th day of August 2002 at a Regular Meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
COMMISSIONERS:
Auerbach, Chen, Saadati, Wong and Chairperson Corr
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
/s/Steve Piasecki
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
/s/Charles Corr
Charles Corr, Chairperson
Planning Commission
G:\Planning\PDREPOR~RES~MCA-2001-04 reso.doc
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM
Application: MCA-2001-04, EA-2002-10
Applicant: City of Cupertino
Property Owner: Various
Property Location: City-wide
Agenda Date: August 26, 2002
Application Summary: Amendments to Chapter 19.84 of the Cupertino Municipal
Code and other sections of the code, if needed, related to changes to Second Dwelling
Unit regulations.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission:
· Request that the City Council authorize modifications to Chapter 19.84 of the
Cupertino Municipal Code, Second Dwelling Units in R-l, RHS, A and A-1 Zones, based
on the Model Ordinance attached as Exhibit A.
BACKGROUND
Section 65852.2 of the California Government Code requires that local governments
allow second dwelling units in residential zoning districts. Local governments have
the choice of adopting an ordinance. If no ordinance is adopted, homeowners may
apply for a conditional use permit for a second dwelling unit based upon the standards
set forth in §65852.2 of the California Government Code. Cupertino adopted a second
dwelling unit ordinance in 1992. Prior to 1992, a section of the R-1 ordinance allowed
second dwelling units in R-1 (Single-family residential) zones.
The current ordinance allows second dwelling units in all residential zoning districts
with the following key site development regulations:
· Regardless of lot size, second dwelling units can be a maximum square footage of
640 square feet (exclusive of decks and garages).
· On lots of 10,000 square feet or greater, the second dwelling unit may be detached.
· On lots of less than 10,000 square feet, the second dwelling unit must be attached.
· All accesses to second units must be screened from the street.
· All second units must have direct access without going through the principal
dwelling unit.
· In addition to the parking requirement for the applicable zoning district, an
additional, off street, parking space must be provided for all second dwelling units.
Amendments to Chapter 19.84 of the Cupertino Municipal Code and other sections of the code, if
needed, related to changes to Second Dwelling Unit regulations.
August 26, 2002
Page 2
DISCUSSION
As part of the Cupertino General Plan update, one of the Housing Element
implementation programs stated the City of Cupertino would evaluate and, if
necessary, revise the Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance to encourage the production of
more second dwelling units. Staff has evaluated the second dwelling unit ordinance to
determine the necessary amendments with the goal of promoting affordable housing
while minimizing adverse impacts to neighborhoods. The following are suggested
amendments to the ordinance.
· Regardless of lot size, a second dwelling unit. may be detached if it meets the
prescribed architectural review standards stated in the ordinance.
· On lots of 10,000 square feet or greater, a second dwelling unit may be a maximum
of 800 square feet, exclusive of garages and decks.
· On lots less than 10,000 square feet, a second dwelling unit may be a maximum of
640 square feet, exclusive of garages and decks.
· Illegal second dwelling units may apply to the Design Review Committee for
approval, based upon the architectural review criteria defined in the ordinance
instead of applying for a Conditional Use Permit.
· When the principal dwelling unit has less than the minimum off-street parking
spaces for the applicable residential zoning district in which it is located, as
described in Chapter 19.100, Parking Regulations, then one additional off-street
parking space shall be provided.
Although these amendments appear small in scope, staff believes that they will
provide interested homeowners greater incentive to construct second dwelling units.
Prepared by:
Approved by:
Vera Gil, Senior Planner
Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Developme~
Attachments
Model Resolution
Recommendation of Environmental Review Committee
Initial Study
Exhibit A: Model Ordinance
Exhibit B: Chapter 19.84 Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance with proposed amendments
Exhibit C: §65852.2 of the California Government Code
G:~PianningkPDREPORTXpcMCAreports\04-MCA-01 sr.doc
CITY OF CUPERTINO
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure adopted by the City Council
of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1973, and amended on March 4, 1974, January 17
1977, May 1, 1978, and July 7,1980, the following described project was granted a
Negative Declaration by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on September 16,
2002.
PROIECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
EA-2002-10
Application No.:
Applicant:
Location:
MCA-2001-04
City of Cupertino
Citywide
DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUEST
Amendments to Chapter 19.84 of the Cupertino Municipal Code and other sections of
the code, if needed, related to changes to Second Dwelling Unit regulations.
FINDINGS OF DECISIONMAKING BODY
The City Council granted a Negative Declaration since the project is consistent with the
General Plan and there are no significant environmental impacts.
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK
This is to certify that the above Negative Declaration was filed in the Office of the City
Clerk of the City of Cupertino on
City Clerk
g/erc/negEA200210
OTY OF
City of Cupertino
lO3OO Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3251
CUPEI iNO FAX (408)777-3333
Community Development Department
INri:IAL STUDY "- 'ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CHECKLIST
~Staff Use Only
~.A File No. EA-2002-07
Ease File Nc. MCA-2002-04
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ~Attachments
Project Title: Second Unit Ordinance Amendment
ProjeCt Location: City-Wide
Project Description: Amendment to Chapter 19.84 of the Cupertino Municipal Code
and other sections of the code, if needed, related to chan,qes to the Second Dwellin,q
Unit re,qulations.
Environmental Setting:
Second units will be located in the residential zonin,q districts.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Site Area (ac.) - ~ Building Coverage - ~% Exist. Building -
Bldg. - s.f. Zone - G.P. Designation -
Assessor's Parcel No. -
If Residential, Units/Gross Acre -
s.f. Proposed
Total# Rental/Own Bdrms Total s.f. Price
Unit Type #1
Unit Type #2
Unit Type #3
Unit Type #4
Unit Type #5
Applicable Special Area Plans: (Check)
[] Monta Vista Design Guidelines
S. De Anza Conceptual
[] N. De Anza Conceptual
[] S. Sara-Sunny Conceptual
[] Stevens Crk Blvd. Conceptual
[] Stevens Creek Blvd. SW & Landscape
If Non-Residential, Building Area - s.f.
Employees/Shift -__Parking Required
Project Site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area -
FAR - Max.
Parking Provided
YES []
NO []
o d-II
INITIAL STUDY SOURCE LIST
A. CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN SOURCES
Co
1. Land Use Element
2. Public Safety Element
3. Housing Element
4. Transportation Element
5. Environmental Resources
6. Appendix A- Hillside Development
7. Land Use Map
8. Noise Element Amendment
9. City Ridgeline Policy
10. Constraint Maps
CUPERTINO SOURCE DOCUMENTS
11. Tree Preservation ordinance 778
12. City Aerial Photography Maps
13. "Cupertino Chronicle" (California History
Center, 1976)
14. Geological Report (site specific)
15. Parking Ordinance 1277
16. Zoning Map
17. Zoning Code/Specific Plan Documents
18. City Noise Ordinance
CITY AGENCIES Site
19. Community Development Dept. List
20. Public Works Dept.
21. Parks & Recreation Department
22. Cupertino Water Utility
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
23. County Planning Department
24. Adjacent Cities' Planning Departments
25. County Departmental of Environmental
Health
OUTSIDE AGENCIES (Continued)
26. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District
27. County Parks and Recreation Department
28. Cupertino Sanitary District
29. Fremont Union High School District
30. Cupertino Union School District
31. Pacific Gas and Electric
32. Santa Clara County Fire Department
33. County Sheriff
34. CALTRANS
35. County Transportation Agency
36. Santa Clara Valley Water District
OUTSIDE AGENCY DOCUMENTS
37. BAAQMD Survey of Contaminant
Excesses
38. FEMA Flood Maps/SCVWD Flood Maps
39. USDA, "Soils of Santa Clara County"
40. County Hazardous Waste Management
Plan
41. County Heritage Resources Inventory
42. Santa Clam Valley Water District Fuel
Leak Site
43. CalEPA Hazardous Waste and
Substances Site
OTHER SOURCES
44. Project Plan Set/Application Materials
45. Field Reconnaissance
46. Experience w/project of similar
scope/characteristics
47. ABAG Projection Series
INSTRUCTIONS
A. Complete all information requested on the Initial Study Cover page. LEAVE BLANK SPACES
ONLY WHEN A SPECIFIC ITEM IS NOT APPLICABLE.
B. Consult the Initial Study Source List; use the materials listed therein to complete, the checklist
information in Categories A through O.
C. You are encouraged to cite other relevant sources; if such sources are used, job in their title(s)
in the "Source" column next to the question to which they relate.
D. If you check any of the "YES" response to any questions, you must attach a sheet explaining the
potential impact and suggest mitigation if needed.
E. When explaining any yes response, label your answer clearly (Example "N - 3 Historical") Please
try to respond concisely, and place as many explanatory responses as possible on each paqe.
F. Upon completing the checklist, sign and date the Preparer's Affidavit.
C. Please attach the following materials before submitting the Initial Studyto the City.
,/Project Plan Set of Legislative Document
,/Location map with site clearly marked
(when applicable)
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
ISSUES:
[and Supporting Information Sources]
I. AESTHETICS - Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista? [5,9,24,41,44]
b) Substantially damage scenic resources,
including, but not limited to, trees, rock
outcroppings, and historic buildings within a
state scenic highway?. [5,9,11,24,34,41,44]
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual
character or quality of the site and its
surroundings? [1,1 7,19,44]'
d) Create a new source of substantial light or
glare, which would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area? [1,16,44]
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In
determining whether impacts to agricultural
resources are significant environmental
effects, lead agencies may refer to the
California Agricultural Land Evaluation and
Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by
the California Dept. of Conservation as an
optional model to use in assessing impacts
on agriculture and farmland. Would the
project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use? [5,7,39]
b) Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract? [5,7,23]
c) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location or
nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use? [5,7,39]
ISSUES: = = n~ ~o m
[and Supporting Information Sources] ~ ~ E ~ ~ '~ ~ i- .=_ =.
- =o E
o._
II1. AIR QUALITY - Where available, the
significance criteria established by the
applicable air quality management or air
pollution control district may be relied upon
to make the following determinations. Would
the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of [] [] [] []
the applicable air quality plan? [5,37,42,44]
b) Violate any air quality standard or [] [] [] []
contribute substantially to an existing or
projected air quality violation? [5,37,42,44]
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net [] [] [] []
increase of any criteria pollutant for which
the project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality
standard (including releasing emissions
which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)? [4,37,44]
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial [] [] [] []
pollutant concentrations? [4,37,44]
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a [] [] [] []
substantial number of people? [4,37,44]
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -Would
the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either [] [] [] []
directly or through habitat modifications, on
any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by
the California Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
[5,10,27,44]
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any [] [] [] []
riparian habitat or other sensitive natural
community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and Game or
US Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44]
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on [] [] [] []
federally protected wetlands as defined by
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal
[and Supporting Information Sources] ~ ~-E ~, .-- o _
pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other
means? [20,36,44]
d) Interfere substantially with the movement [] [] [] []
of any native resident or migratory fish or
wildlife species or with established native.
resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites? [5,10,12,21,26]
e) C(~nflict with any local policies or [] [] [] []
ordinances protecting biological resources,
such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance? [11,12,41]
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted
Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural [] [] [] []
Community Conservation Plan, or other
approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan? [5,10,26,27]
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the
project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in [] [] [] []
the significance of a historical resource as
defined in §15064.57 [5,13,41]
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in [] [] [] []
the significance of an archaeological
resource pursuant to §15064.5? [5,13,41]
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique [] [] [] E~
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature? [5,13,41]
d) Disturb any human remains, including [] [] [] []
those interred outside of formal cemeteries?
[1,5]
VI, GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the
project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk
of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as [] [] [] []
delineated on the most recent ^lquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
ISSUES:
[and SuppoSing Information Sources]
State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault9
Refer to Division of Mines and Geology
Special Publication 42. [2,14,44]
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking9
[=,~,~ 0,44]
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction? [2,5,10,39,44]
iv) Landslides? [2,5,10,39,44]
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the
loss of topsoil? [2,5,10,44]
c) Be I~ated on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as
a result of the project, and potentially result
in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
[=,~,~ 0,~]
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined
in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code
(1997), creating substantial risks to life or
prope~? [2,5,10]
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supposing the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water? [6,9,36,39]
VII. H~ARDS AND H~ARDOUS
MATERIALS - Would the project:
a) Create a significant h~ard to the public or
the environment through the routine
transpoA, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials? [32,40,42,43,44]
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or
the environment through reasonably
foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials
into the environment? [32,40,42,43,44]
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely h~ardous materials,
substances, or waste within one-quaAer mile
ISSUES: '" = ¢~ -~'~ m '" --
[and Supporting Information Sources]
of an existing or proposed school?
[2,29,30,40,44]
d) Be located on a site which is included on a [] [] [] []
list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the
environment? [2,42,40,43]
e) FOr a project located within an airport land [] [] [] []
use 151an or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project result
in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area? [ ]
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private [] [] [] El
airstrip, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the
project area? [ ]
g) Impair implementation of or physically [] [] [] []
interfere with an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation
plan? [2,32,33,44]
h) Expose people or structures to a [] [] [] []
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are intermixed with
wildlands?[1,2,44]
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
- Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or [] [] [] []
waste discharge requirements? [20,36,37] ,
b) Substantially deplete groundwater [] [] [] []
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there would
be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local groundwater table level
(e.g., the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level
which would not support existing land uses
or planned uses for which permits have been
granted)? [20,36,42]
ISSUES:
[and Supporting Information Sources]
e) Create or contribute runoff water which
would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned stormwater drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff? [20,36,42]
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water
quality? [20,36,37]
g) Pi,ace housing within a 100-year flood
hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood
Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate
Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
[2,38]
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area
structures which would impede or redirect
flood flows? [2,38]
i) Expose people or structures to a significant
risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding,
including flooding as a result of the failure of
a levee or dam? [2,36,38]
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or
mudflow? [2,36,38]
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would
the project:
a) Physically divide an established
community? [7,12,22,41]
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan,
policy, or regulation of an agency with
jurisdiction over the project (including, but
not limited to the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance)
adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
[1,7,8,16,17,18,44]
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat
conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan? [1,5,6,9,26]
X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the
project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to
[andISSUES:supporting Information ~1 =- ~~'=;'~ ~ ¢~'~_~' ~o ~
-'- E
'*-' ~ 0
Sourc-s, o .-~ ~ · ~ _1 ~
the region and the residents of the state?
[5,1o]
b) Result in the loss of availability of a [] [] [] []
locally-important mineral resource recovery
site delineated on a local general plan,
specific plan or other land use plan? [5,10]
Xl. NOISE - Would the project result in:
a) E,xposure of persons to, or generation of, [] [] [] []
noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies? [8,18,44]
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of [] C] [] []
excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels? [8,18,44]
c) A substantial permanent increase in [] [] [] []
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity
above levels existing without the project?
[8,18]
d) A substantial temporary or periodic [] [] [] []
increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing without
the project? [8,18,44]
e) For a project located within an airport land [] [] [] []
use plan or, where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public airport
or public use airport, would the project
expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
[8,18,44]
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private [] [] [] []
airstrip, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels? [8,18]
Xll, POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would
the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an [] [] [] []
area, either directly (for example, by
proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)? [3,16,47,44]
ISSUES:
[and Supporting Information Sources]
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44]
c) Displace substantial numbers of people,
necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44]
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial
adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or
physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of ~ich could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable se~ice ratios, response times or
other pe~ormance objectives for any of the
public se~ices:
Fire protection? [19,32,~]
Police protection? [33,44]
Schools? [29,30,44]
Parks? [5,17,19,21,26,27,44]
Other public facilities? [19,20,44]
XIV. RECREATION -
a) Would the project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
faciliW would occur or be accelerated?
[5,17,19,21,26,27,44]
b) Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment? [5,44]
XV. TRANSPORTATIO~RAFFIC -
Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is
substantial in relation to the existing traffic
ISSUES: ~ ; = = =. == ~ ~ ..__- == =o =
[and Supporting Information Sources] ~ ~ E ~ :~ u° _~ e) -
· =.~ -~ = '-
load and capacity of the street system (i.e.,
result in a substantial increase in either the
number of vehicle trips, the volume to.
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections)? [4,20,35,44]
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, [] [] [] []
a level of service standard established by the
county congestion management agency for
designated roads or highways? [4,20,44]
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, [] [] [] []
including either an increase in traffic levels or
a change in location that results in
substantial safety risks? [4,?]
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a [] [] [] []
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)? [20,35,44]
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? [] [] [] []
[2,19,32,33,44]
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? [] [] [] []
[17,44]
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or [] [] [] []
programs supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle
racks)? [4,34]
Comments:
The removal of the requirement for an additional parking space for a second dwelling unit
may result in more cars parking on residential streets. Since second units are not
concentrated in many neighborhoods, the impact should be minimal.
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS -
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment [] [] [] []
requirements of the applicable Regional
Water Quality Control Board? [5,22,28,36,44]
b) Require or result in the construction of [] [] [] []
new water or wastewater treatment facilities
or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects? [36,22,28,36]
ISSUES:.""= = = I-,,, = ~ ~ I.-; =."' o ~o=
[and Supporting Information SOurces] ~ ~ _E ~ '~ oo e, u)
=.~ ~ = '-
c) Require or result in the construction of [] [] [] []
new storm water drainage facilities or.
expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects? [5,22,28,36,44]
e) Result in a determination by the [] [] [] []
wastewater treatment provider which serves
or m,ay serve the project that it has adequate
capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments? [5,22,28,36,44]
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient [] [] [] []
permitted capacity to accommodate the
project's solid waste disposal needs? [?]
g) Comply with federal, state, and local [] [] [] []
statutes and regulations related to solid
waste? [?]
~~ ~XVIL~MANDATORY.
ISSUES:
[and SuppoSing Information Sources]
a) Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quali~ of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or ~ldlife
population to drop below se~-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
communiW, reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal or eliminats impo~ant examples of
the major perils of California histo~ or
prehisto~ ~
b) Does the project have impa~s that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ('Cumulat~ely
considerable' means that the incremental
effects of a project are ~nsiderable when
viewed in connection with the effec~ of past
projects, the effects of other current projects,
and the effects of probable future proj~ts)?
c) Does the project have environmental
effects which will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly? ~
PREPARER'S AFFIDAVIT
I hereby certify that the information provided in this Initial Study is true and correct to the
best of my knowledge and belief; I certify that I have used proper diligence in responding
accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted appropriate soume references
when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. I
hereby acknowledge than any substantial errors dated within this Initial Study may cause
delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and hereby agree to hold
harmless the City of Cupertino, its staff and authorized agents, from the consequences of
such delay or discontinuance.
Preparer's Signature !J, 07_~. ~.~.~'_~
Print Preparer's Name [/~.~'~. ~'
I ii'i,,'i *~'~ ~ ENVIR0~NMENT~ EVALUATION (Th 15blcom~,letedbYCity Staff)
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the
checklist on the following pages.
[] Aesthetics [] Agriculture Resources [] Air Quality
[] Biological Resources [] Cultural Resources [] Geology/Soils
[] Hazards & Hazardous [] Hydrology / Water [] Land Use / Planning
Materials Quality
[] Mineral Resources [] Noise [] Population / Housing
[] Public Services [] Recreation El Transportation/Traffic
[] Utilities / Service [] Mandatory Findings of
Systems Significance
DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) finds that:
The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and
a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have
been made by or agreed toby the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
The proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially
significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has
been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT' REPORT
is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, '
because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an
earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b)
have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the
proposed project, nothing further is required.
ER"~Chairperson
Date
Date
CITY OF
CUPE INO
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
FAX (408) 777-3333
Community Development Department
Summary
Agenda Item No. C:~
Agenda Date: September 16, 2002
SUBJECT:
Request to initiate revisions to chapters 10.48 (Noise Ordinance) of the Cupertino
Municipal Code regarding home maintenance activities.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council:
· Authorize staff to initiate revisions to the Noise Ordinance (Chapter 10.48)
regarding home maintenance activities and other related issues of clarification.
BACKGROUND
On June 3, 2002, Mr. Jeff Herman came before the City Council under Oral
Communications to express his concerns regarding the hours of operation and noise
limits of leaf blowers. Mr. Herman, who resides at 20350 Stevens Creek Boulevard
#518, had lodged complaints of early hour leaf blower disturbances at the City Center
Apartment Complex.
On August 29th, 2002, staff met with Mr. Hem-tan and the code enforcement staff to
discuss this issue. Mr. Herman requested that this issue be raised with the Council and
that the Noise Ordinance be amended to address early morning home maintenance
activities. Mr. Herman will show a video presentation at the Council meeting on leaf
blower disturbances.
The Noise Ordinance currently allows home maintenance activities to occur from 7:00
a.m. - 8:00 p.m. on weekdays and 9:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. on weekends. Mr. Herman
would like the Ordinance amended to limit the weekdays to the hours of 8:00 a.m. -
8:00 p.m.
The Council may recall a similar recent request by a City resident to amend the
allowable construction hours to mitigate early morning noise impacts from construction
activities. The Council approved the request and amended the allowable weekend
construction hours from 8:00 a.m. - 8:00 p.m. to 9:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. Weekday
construction hours are permitted between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. and were not changed
by the amendment.
Request to initiate revisions to the Noise Ordinance regard home maintenance activities.
September 16, 2002
Page 2
DISCUSSION
Staff considers this request to review the ordinance to be reasonable and feels that some
accommodation could be made to the Noise Ordinance to address the noise impacts
from early yard maintenance activities. Staff recommends that the amendment evaluate
if the start time of home maintenance activities should be adjusted to 8:00 a.m. on
weekdays as requested by Mr. Herman.
In addition to amending the home maintenance activity hours in the Noise Ordinance,
staff will use this opportunity to review the Noise Ordinance for additional issues of
clarification such as the measurement procedure for daytime and nighttime maximum
noise levels (Section 10.48.040).
Should the Council authorize the Noise Ordinance amendment, staff will schedule this
item for a Planning Commission hearing and the revised Noise Ordinance language
will return to the City Council for final approval.
Staff will make an attempt to contact the home maintenance equipment industry
representatives to advise them of this action and give them an opportunity to evaluate
the proposed changes.
Steve Piasecki, Director of
Community Development
SUBMITTED BY:
David W. Knapp, City Manager
G:\ Planning\PDREPORT\ CC\ MCA-2002-04cc.doc
CITY OF
CUPEILTINO
City Hall
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
(408) 777-3354
FAX (408) 777-3333
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
AGENDA ITEM
Summary
AGENDA DATE September 16~ 2002
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Cupertino Public Library and Civic Center - Status Report on Project Design
BACKGROUND
On March 19, 2002, the City Council approved the conceptual design of the Cupertino
Public Library and Civic Center Project, and directed staffto proceed with further design
details and refinements consistent with the approved concept. Staff was also asked to
report back to the Council when sufficient detail had been developed for a presentation on
the appearance, color schemes and other refinements. Staff expected that the schedule
would provide that opportunity in September or October. This report responds to that
request.
Schedule
The project currently calls for completion in October 2004. With approval of the
temporary location lease for the library and the current state of the design the project is on
schedule.
The staffproject team is currently evaluating the approach to the construction schedule to
ensure completion on time and within the approved budget. One approach that is being
considered is to build the project in two sequential construction contracts. The first would
be the demolition and grading work (i.e., salvaging and demolition of the old library
building and the grading of the site including the central Civic Center Plaza). The second
project would be the construction of the rest of the project (i.e., library, community hall
and plaza).
There are some advantages to this approach, which is made possible by the timely move
of the library program to a temporary location in November 2002. The most important
advantage is that with demolition and grading, there are often unforeseen problems that
would need to be then into account which could take additional time.
PrinteclonRecycledP&oer ~~t~0- /.
The cost and risk to extend the time for a much smaller contract in the early part of the
schedule is much less than if unforeseen underground or related demolition issues were to
occur under a much larger building contract. Also, it is the City's intention to salvage as
much of the building materials in the existing library as possible for recycling or reuse.
These include such things as the tile roof, the concrete and other building materials as
well as fixtures or other items within the building. Salvage and recycling also takes longer
than a simple demolition but is usually more cost effective and helps meet the City's
waste diversion goals.
The library staff and materials will move to the new location in November 2002 and the
design documents for the first of the two contracts should be completed and advertised
for construction bids later this year to begin construction soon after the first of the year.
The second contract would proceed sometime in the late spring or summer of 2003 for
completion by October 2004.
Conceptual Design
Since approval of the final design concept, staff and the design team, along with the
Library staff, have been working to refine the details of the buildings and the plaza,
including alternatives for materials on the exterior of the Library and Community hall
buildings and the surface of the Plaza. Staff and the design Architects, SMWM, will
make a presentation to the Council on the status of the work to date. The attached
renderings and model photographs are examples of the details to be discussed by the
design team.
Budget and Costs
As a greater level of specificity and detail emerges in the course of the evolving design,
staff and the architects continue to review cost information to ensure that the project
design stays with the adopted budget approved by the City Council in the 2002-2003
Capital Improvement program. This effort is on going and is evaluated at every phase of
the design schedule until the project is advertised for construction bids. As a result, the
project is currently within the approved budget and every effort will continue to be made
to ensure that the final design remains within the budget with sufficient built-in
contingencies for unforeseen conditions.
Issues
Several issues, which have been raised by the Council, are also being addressed as part of
the completion of the project design as follows:
Conference space: The 3000 square feet (sf) Community Hall will provide ample space
for library events now provided in the existing library by the 1385 sf space in the
basement meeting room. However, the Council expressed a eoneem that there may still
exist a need for a smaller dedicated space for groups of up to 40 persons that is not
included in the Community Hall facility.
Once the new buildings are open, the existing Council Chambers in City hall will be
modified and reconfigured to provide additional administrative office and conference
space. The existing conference Rooms in City Hall (A and B) can accommodate up to 20
persons and 30 persons respectively. The reconfiguration of the Council Chambers would
include a conference space similar in quality to A and B but would be able to
accommodate meetings of up to 40 people. However, to allow the use of this conference
room by outside groups would require a change in current policy which dictates City Hall
conference space is to be used only for direct City business (Council, Staff, Commissions,
and other groups working on City sponsored activities).
Review of FF&E Requirements with Library_ Staff for Fundraising efforts: The City and
Library staffs are working to develop a scope of needs for the furnishings, fixtures and
equipment (FF&E) for the new facility. The approval of the CIP included a requirement
that up to $1.2 Million for FF&E would be raised by the Community to support that need.
Except for built-in fixtures and furnishings, there is no funding in the construction budget
for FF&E. The Library Department staffwill be present to assist in the discussion of this
effort.
Review list of naming opportunities: On July 15, 2002, the Council approved a tentative
list of naming opportunities as part of the fundraising effort. A copy of the approved list
is attached for Council's information and discussion.
City Staff, library staff and the Architects will provide the Council with a status report on
the project and will be available for questions and/or discussion at the Council meeting.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
This report is for the Council's information only and no action is required.
Submitted by:
Ralph A. Qualls, Jr.
Director of Public Works
Approved for submission:
David W. Knapp
City Manager
CITY OF
CUPEI TINO
City Hall
10300 Torte Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Telephone: (408) 777-3220
FAX: (408) 777-3366
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Agenda Item No. ~2/
SUMMARY
Meeting Date: July 15, 2002
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Review and comment on the library naming oppommities offered in conjunction with the
Community Fundraiser for $1.2 million.
BACKGROUND
Last August, the City Council was asked by the library community to appropriate an
additional $3 million dollars towards the library project, bringing the total project cost to
$22 million dollars. The City was able to identify approximately $1.8 million of additional
funding, and asked the community to come up with the difference of $1.2 million. The
community accepted the challenge of raising $1.2 million dollars towards this project.
To help in the fundraising effort, a list of naming opportunities has been compiled to
entice donors to contribute larger dollar amounts to the campaign. This list is attached for
your review and comments. As the fundraising efforts are independent of the City staff
functions, we are only asking for your feedbackjand no authorization or official action on
the part of the Council is needed.
RECOMMENDATION:
Review and comment on the attached list of naming opportunities.
Submitted by:
Carol A. Atwood
Director of Administrative Sen'ices
Approved for submission:
David W. Knapp
City Manager
Naming Opportunities for Library and Civic Center/Community Hall
1. Library Courtyard
2. Community Hall
3. Children's Room
4. International Languages Area
5. Children's Story Area
6. Teen Area
7. Covered Arcade
8. Plaza Water Fountains
9. Adult New Materials/Media Browsing Area
10. New Periodicals Display Area
11. Children's Group Study Room
12. Teen Group Study Room
13. Adult Nonfiction Area
14. California Western Americans (CWA) Collection Area
15. Adult Quiet Study Room
16. Adult Fiction Area
17. Adult Reference Area
18. Computer Training Area
19. Microform Area
$250,000
$250,000
$100,000
$75,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$25,0OO
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$25,000
$15,000
$10,000
$10,000
$5,000
VIEW FROM TOWN CENTER LANE
HARGREAVES ASSOCIATESI I "--
CITY OF CUPERTINO · Cl~,'r:. CENTER
VIEW FROM CITY HALL TOWARD CiViC PLAZA
HARGREAVES ASSOCIATES I I,,,.~.,
CITY OF CUPERTINO · CiViC CENTER
CITY OF
CUPEP INO
City Hall
10300 Torte Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Telephone: (408) 777-3354
FAX: (408) 777-3333
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Summary
AGENDA ITEM "~ ',-~
AGENDA DATE September 16, 2002
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Resolution No. 02~ Authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute an Agreement
between the City and Nova Partners for the construction management services on the Civic
Center project, for a fee not to exceed $850,000, and authorizing the Director of Public Works to
execute up to an additional $75,000 of Additional Services, as may be required to complete the
work.
BACKGROUND
On November 23,2001, Public Works staff issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for
Construction Management services for the Civic Center project. The RFQ was advertised in the
San Jose Business Journal and posted on the City's web site, and was mailed to a list of
approximately 50 interested firms in this field.
By the closing date of December 11, 2001, ten firms had submitted their qualifications and
expressed an interest in the Construction Management services for the new Library and Civic
Center project. Following an initial screening and evaluation of the 10 submittals by a review
team, four firms were selected as being the most qualified, and were invited to make a team
presentation before a selection panel. The firms included Turner Construction, Swinerton
Management, Harris & Associates, and Nova Parmers.
On January 9, 2002, the selection panel, interviewed each of the finalist firms and unanimously
ranked Nova Partners as the most qualified. The Construction Management (CM) services to be
provided under this contract include numerous activities and responsibilities in the oversight of
the construction of the project and the work of the construction contractors. These include such
items as cost estimating, scheduling, quality assurance, special material testing, contractor
requests for substitution, contractor requests for change orders, and claims avoidance.
In the intervening time since Nova Partners was selected, it was not deemed to be prudent to
encumber the majority of the funds for the full services contract until this point in the
development of the design. A minor contract was executed with Nova to acquire some staff
assistance services to Public Works staff and CM services on the Civic Center, as well as some
assistance in developing the concepts for the Sports Center and the City Center Park, under
separate minor agreements.
Printed on Recycled Paper
The major portion of the CM services will soon be required as the project nears construction
documentation, final cost estimating and scheduling and ultimate award of construction contracts
during the remainder of the 2002-2003 Fiscal Year. Staffhas negotiated a fee in the amount of
$850,000 for all construction management services for the project. This fee represents
approximately 4.3 % of the constructed cost and is considered very reasonable for the period of
time and the services provided.
FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of this recommendation will encumber $925,000, which is available in the approved
FY 2002 - 2003 Capital Improvement Program for the Library and Civic Center project.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the City Council adopt Resolution No. 02 ., encumbering $925,000,
authorizing execution of an agreement with Nova Parmers to provide professional construction
management services for the Civic Center project for a fee of $850,000 and authoriZing the
Director of Public Works to expend an additional $75,000 for Additional Services, as may be
required to complete the work.
Submitted by:
Ralph A. Qualls, Jr.
Director of Public Works
Approved for submission:
David W. Knapp
City Manager
DRAFT
RESOLUTION NO. 02-173
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND NOVA PARTNERS FOR CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE CIVIC CENTER PROJECT FOR A FEE NOT TO
EXCEED $850,000 AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO EXECUTE
UP TO AN ADDITIONAL $75,000 OF ADDITIONAL SERVICES AS MAY BE REQUIRED TO
COMPLETE THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) was issued for construction management
services for the Civic Center project and Nova Partners was selected as the most qualified to provide
oversight of the construction of the project, including cost estimating, scheduling, quality assurance,
special material testing, contractor requests for substitution, change orders, and claims avoidance; and
WHEREAS, it was determined that a majority of the funds for the full services contract need
not be encumbered until a certain point in design development and the major portion will soon be
required for construction documentation, final cost estimating, scheduling, and the award of
construction contracts; and
WHEREAS, staff has negotiated a fee with Nova Partners in the amount of $850,000 for all
construction management services; and
WHEREAS, the provisions, terms, and conditions of the aforementioned agreement have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and the City Manager.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino
hereby approves the aforementioned agreement and authorizes the City Manager to negotiate and
execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Cupertino.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Director of Public Works has been authorized to
execute up to an additional $75,000 of additional services as may be required to complete the project.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino
this 16th day of September, 2002, by the following vote:
Vote
Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
CITY OF
Agenda ItemNo. ez~(g:?C..
city Hall
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Telephone: (408) 777-3220
FAX: {408) 777-3366
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
SUM RY
Meeting Date: September 16, 2002
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Adopt Resolution Authorizing and Directing the Preparation and Execution of Certain Lease Financing
Documents, Authorizing the Preparation and Distribution of a Preliminary Official Statement in
Connection with the Offering and Sale of Certificates of Participation Relating Thereto, and Authorizing
and Directing Certain Actions with Respect Thereto.
BACKGROUND
The City has been moving forward on the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), which includes a
new public library estimated to cost $22 million dollars. As part of financing this CIP, it is now time to
issue approximately $15 million of new debt. Also, the City is a member of the Silicon Valley Animal
Control Joint Powers Authority (the "JPA"). The JPA is in the process of building an animal shelter
facility to be located in Santa Clara. The City's portion of the cost of the facility is estimated to be
approximately $1 million dollars. R is recommended that the City issue Certificates of Participation for a
total of $16 million to provide financing for the library project and the new animal shelter. The City
previously issued and currently has outstanding Certificates of Participation as follows:
parAmount parAmount F~al
Originally ~rrently AnnUal Debt,
Issue Date Issued Outstan~g ServiCe Date
1992 Refunding, Series A 12/1/92 $10,785,000 $ 7,760,000 $ 820,000 7/1/2016
1992 Refunding, Series B 12/1/92 $14,585,000 $ 7,875,000 $ 1,325,000 7/1/2010
1993 Refunding, Series A 12/1/93 $ 36,900,000 $ 26,735,000 $ 2,780,000 7/1/2016
TOTAL $ 62,270,000 $ 42,370,000 $ 4,925,000'
* Annual debt service decreases to $3,600,000 after 7/1/2010 when the 1992 Refunding, Series B Certificates mature.
The City can refinance these Certificates (collectively the "Prior Certificates") in today's market, keep the
same amortization of the obligations and realize the following reductions in annual payments.
~ Annual PaYment Annual Payment
'7/1/2003-2010 7/1/2011~7/1/2016
Desc~Pfi°n ~, i, ,,,
Prior Certificates $ 4,925,000 $ 3,600,000
Refunding Certificates 4,129,000 3,010,000
Annual Savings $ 796,000 $ 590,000
Therefore, the total nominal dollars savings from the refunding of the Prior Certificates would be
approximately $9,860,000. The present value of these future savings would be $3,170,647 for a net
present value savings as a percentage of the outstanding Certificates of 7.72%. The industry rule of
thumb is that anytime the net present value exceeds 3% the City should undertake the refunding. Because
the City had previously advance refunded the Prior Certificates in 1992 and 1993, under current tax law,
the City must wait until the Prior Certificates can be current refunded before the City can undertake a
refunding of the Prior Certificates. The definition of a current refunding is that the refunded obligation
can be defeased within ninety-days of the issuance of the refunding obligation. The Prior Certificates are
able to be current refunded anytime after October 1, 2002.
The voters of Cupertino recently passed an extension of the utility tax to July 1, 2030. The purpose of the
tax was to fund the library and other capital facility needs of the City. By refunding the Prior Certificates
and adding $16 million of new money to the amount of Certificates, the City is able to provide the
funding needed for the library and the City's portion of the animal shelter and keep its annual debt service
payments at approximately $3,650,000 per year until 7/1/2030. By structuring the Certificates in this
manner, the City will leverage its debt and ensure an annual collection of utility taxes under the current
Ordinance to help pay for the debt.
FinancinR Structure
To proceed with the financing, City Council will need to approve executing certain legal documents
including a Lease Agreement, a Trust Agreement, and Escrow Agreements; authorizing the competitive
sale of the certificates and directing the Director of Administrative Services to accept the lowest bid;
approving the Official Statement in substantially final form; and authorizing other related actions in
connection with the financing. These documents are described in more detail below. It is also necessary
for the Cupertino Public Facilities Corporation (the "Corporation") to adopt a resolution and direct the
execution of certain legal documents.
Related to the actions described above, a draft copy of the Preliminary Official Statement and other bond'
documents are available for review in the City Clerk's Office.
The transaction is being structured as a 30-year, fixed rate certificate issue. As discussed above, the
Certificates will be sold through competitive bid with the Certificates being awarded to the underwriter
with the lowest total interest cost.
In an effort to ensure the lowest borrowing costs for the City and to ensure a future commitment to the
payment of the annual debt service on the certificates, the financing team explored several financing
structures. This analysis included considering bond insurance and participating in the State Intercept
Program. Insurance protects the certificate holders and lowers interest costs but is an additional expense
for the city. The Intercept program assures timely payment, but also carries a fee. Discussions are still
underway with the bond insurance companies. The transaction should be approved for bond insurance
and for the purchase of a surety bond to replace the cash reserve fund, further reducing the amount of
Certificates to be issued and the resulting annual debt service. Additionally, staff is recommending that
this financing be structured to include participation in the State Intercept Program.
Under provisions of Section 37351.5 of the California Government Code, the City can further secure the
annual lease payments by providing a mechanism by which the State Controller makes payments directly
to the Trustee from the vehicle licensing fees in the event of a payment default on the certificates. The
City is entitled to these fees under Sections 11001-11005 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code.
Under the provisions of the State Intercept Program, the City Council must notify the State Controller of
the election to have the fees "intercepted" by the Trustee at the time of certificate closing. The State
Controller only makes payments to the Trustee after the City fails to pay lease payments under the Lease.
The State reduction in the amount of vehicle licensing fees to be allocated to the City is reduced by the
same amount of funds advanced to the Trustee for lease payments. The actual diversion of vehicle
licensing fee revenue by the State to the Trustee would only occur if the city failed to make lease
payments to the Trustee which would likely only occur if there were insufficient General Fund revenues
available to make lease payments.
There are generally two advantages to municipalities in electing to use the State Intercept Program as
outlined below:
The possibility exists of attracting bond insurance companies to the transaction who might otherwise
choose not to insure this transaction because of the perceived risks associated with a General Fund
appropriation lease debt. Bond insurance would reduce the interest rates by approximately 20 basis
points throughout the maturities providing a net savings in annual debt service.
A policy issue exists associated with pledging revenue received from the State through the Motor
Vehicle License Fee. Staff believes a pledge of Motor Vehicle License Fees ("MVLF") revenue
through the State Intercept Program makes it politically more difficult for the State to divert funds,
which have been pledged for City debt service payments. However, the State is not legally prohibited
from diverting MVLF revenues. The City currently receives approximately $3 million per year in
Motor Vehicle License Fee revenue.
Certificate Documents
By resolution, the Council will approve the following documents that are on file with the City Clerk:
Site and Facility Lease. The Site and Facility Lease is between the City and the Corporation. This,
is the agreement that leases the Property Premises (i.e., Memorial Park, Quinlan Community Center
and other properties, etc.) to the Corporation. This agreement specifies the terms and conditions for
the lease of the Property Premises.
Lease Agreement. This agreement is between the Corporation, as lessor and the City, as lessee. The
agreement specifies the terms and conditions of the lease of the Property Premises, term of payments,
amount of payments, responsibility for the maintenance of the Property Premises during the term of
the agreement.
Assignment Agreement. This agreement is between the Corporation and BNY Western Trust
Company, (the "Trustee"). In this agreement the Corporation assigns substantially all its rights under
the Lease Agreement to the Trustee. For example, rather than the City making semi-annual lease
payments to the Corporation and the Corporation paying the Certificate holders, the City will make its
lease payments directly to the Trustee an the Trustee will pay the Certificate holders.
Trust Agreement. The Trust Agreement (the "Agreement") is between the Corporation, the City and
the Trustee and contains the terms and conditions regarding the Certificates. Pursuant to the
Agreement, the Trustee is given the authority to receive, hold, invest and disburse the monies paid to
it for credit to the various funds and accounts established under the Agreement; to execute the
Certificates; and to apply and disburse payments to Certificates Owners. It sets forth the guidelines
for the administration, investment and treatment of investment earnings generated by each fund and
account. The Agreement obligates the City to pay compensation to the Trustee for services rendered
under the Agreement.
Escrow Agreements. These documents are between the City and BNY Western Trust Company as
the Escrow Bank for the Prior Certificates. The Escrow Agreements (the 1992 A Escrow Agreement,
the 1992 B Escrow Agreement and the 1993 Escrow Agreement) provide for the receipt and
investment of the monies to defease the Prior Certificates on their f'u'st call date of January 1, 2003.
Notice of Intention, Official Notice of Sale and Bid Form. These documents provide the necessary
notice to the underwriting community regarding the sale of the Certificates and the manner in which
the firms must submit their bid for the purchase of the Certificates on a competitive bid basis.
Preliminary Official Statement. This document is the public offering statement for the issuance of
the Certificates. This document thoroughly describes the £mancing program, the public
improvements to be financed, the economic, financial and social characteristics of the City and the
Corporation.
Continuing Disclosure Certificate. This agreement is signed by the City and satisfies the recently
adopted SEC rules regarding continuing disclosure for the issuance of Certificates (SEC Rule 15c2-
12(b)(5)). The agreement obligates the City to continue to provide information regarding the City,
the Corporation and the Certificates to the secondary (Certificate) market as long as the Certificates
are outstanding.
Financing Team Participants
City Staff has been working with the necessary consultants to bring this financing to the Council for
approval. Included in the Resolution that Council is being asked to adopt is the authorization from
Council for Staff to enter into agreements for consulting services with the following firms in the
following capacities: ,
Name of Firm
Quint & Thimmig LLP
E. Wagner & Associates, Inc.
BNY Western Trust Company
R, 91e
Special Counsel
Financial Advisor
Trustee
All fees associated with this financing will be paid from Certificate proceeds.
Financin~ Schedule
The following is the financing schedule:
Date of:
September 16th
September 16~'
September 17a~
October lst
October 16~'
Description of Activity
· Council Adopts the Resolutions Authorizing Sale of Certificates and Approval of
Legal Documents
· Receive Rating and/or Bond Insurance
· Prim and Mail Preliminary Official Statement, Official Notice of Sale and Bid
Form.
· Sale of Certificates
· Certificate Closing-Delivery of Certificate Proceeds to the City and Funding of
Escrow to Defease Prior Certificates on January 1, 2003
RECOMMENDATION
Staffrecommends the Council adopt the following resolutions:
Adopt Resolution Authorizing and Directing the Preparation and Execution of Certain Lease
Financing Documents Authorizing the Preparation and Distribution of a Preliminary Official
Statement in Connection with the Offering and Sale of Certificates of Participation Relating Thereto,
and Authorizing and Directing Certain Actions with Respect Thereto.
Submitted by:
Approved for submission:
Care;1 A. Atwood
Director of Administrative Services
David W. Knapp
City Manager
CITY OF CUPERTINO
RESOLUTION NO. 02-174
DRAFT
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE PREPARATION
AND EXECUTION OF CERTAIN LEASE FINANCING DOCUMENTS,
AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF A
PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE
OFFERING AND SALE OF CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION RELATING
THERETO, ELECTION TO GUARANTEE THE PAYMENT OF LEASE
PAYMENTS FROM MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSE FEES AND AUTHORIZING
AND DIRECTING CERTAIN ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO
RESOLVED, by the City Council (the "Council") of City of Cupertino (the
"City"), as follows:
WHEREAS, the City has heretofore entered into a lease agreement, dated as of
December 1, 1992 (the "1992A Lease"), with the Cupertino Public Facilities Corporation
(the "Corporation") to refinance the acquisition, construction, installation and equipping
of capital facilities within the geographic boundaries of the City originally financed in
1986 (the "1992A Project"), relating to $10,785,000 Certificates of Participation (1992
Refunding, Series A) (the "1992A Certificates");
WHEREAS, the City has also heretofore entered into a lease agreement, dated as
of December 1, 1992 (the "1992B Lease"), with the Corporation to refinance the
acquisition, construction, installation and equipping of capital facilities within the
geographic boundaries of the City originally financed in 1989 and 1990 (collectively, the
"1992B Project"), relating to $14,585,000 Certificates of Participation (1992 Refunding,
Series B) (the "1992B Certificates");
WHEREAS, the City has also heretofore entered into a lease agreement, dated as
of April 1, 1993 (the "1993 Lease" and, with the 1992A Lease and the 1992B Lease, the
"Prior Leases"), with the Corporation to refinance the acquisition, construction,
installation and equipping of capital facilities within the geographic boundaries of the
City originally financed in 1991 (the "1993 Project" and, with the 1992A Project and the
1992B Project, the "Prior Projects"), relating to $36,600,000 Certificates of Participation
(1993 Refunding, Series A) (the "1993 Certificates" and, with the 1992A Certificates and
the 1992B certificates, the "Prior Certificates");
WHEREAS, the City, working together with the Corporation, proposes to enter
into a lease financing and in connection therewith to (a) undertake the refinancing of the
Prior Projects, refinance the City's obligations under the Prior Leases, and provide for the
refunding and defeasance of the Prior Certificates, and (b) finance a portion of the
acquisition, construction, installation and equipping of new City public library (the "2002
Project");
Resolution No. 02-174 Cupertino City Council Page 2
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest and for the public benefit that the City
authorize and direct execution of the Lease Agreement (hereinafter defined) and certain
other documents in connection therewith;
WHEREAS, a preliminary official statement (the "Preliminary Official
Statement") and an official notice of sale (the "Notice of Sale") containing information
material to the offering and sale of the Certificates (hereinafter defined) have been
prepared on behalf of the City; and
WHEREAS, the documents specified below shall be filed with the City and the
members of the Council, with the aid of its staff, shall review said documents;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby DECLARED and ORDERED, as follows:
Section 1. Certificates of Participation (2002 Refinancing and Capital
Improvement Project) (the "Certificates") are hereby authorized to be executed and
delivered pursuant to the provisions of the Trust Agreement (hereinafter defined), so long
as the total principal amount of the Lease Agreement does not exceed $65,000,000, so
long as the maximum annual lease payments to be paid by the City under the Lease
Agreement does not exceed $4,500,000, and so long as the term of the Lease Agreement
does not extend beyond July 1, 2030.
Section 2. The below-enumerated documents be and are hereby approved, and the
Mayor, the City Manager, the Director of Administrative Services, or the designee of any
such official, is hereby authorized and directed to execute said documents, with such
changes, insertions and omissions as may be approved by such official, and the City
Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to attest to such official's signature:
(a) a termination agreement, by and among the Corporation, the City and BNY
Western Trust Company, as successor to First Interstate Bank of California, as trustee for
the 1992A Certificates, providing for the termination of the legal documents relating to
the 1992A Certificates;
(b) a termination agreement, by and among the Corporation, the City and BNY
Western Trust Company, as successor to First Interstate Bank of California, as trustee for
the 1992B Certificates, providing for the termination of the legal documents relating to
the 1992B Certificates;
(c) a termination agreement, by and among the Corporation, the City and BNY
Western Trust Company, as successor to First Interstate Bank of California, as trustee for
the 1993 Certificates, providing for the termination of the legal documents relating to the
1993 Certificates;
(d) a site and facility lease, between the City, as lessor, and the Corporation, as
lessee;
(e) a lease agreement, by and between the Corporation, as lessor, and the City, as
lessee (the "Lease Agreement");
(f) a trust agreement, by and among the Corporation the City and BNY Western
Trust Company, as trustee (the "Trust Agreement"), relating to the financing, and the
execution and delivery of the Certificates;
Resolution No. 02-174 Cupertino City Council Page 3
(f) an escrow deposit and trust agreement, by and between the City and BNY
Western Trust Company, as escrow bank (the "Escrow Bank"), relating to provision for
the payment of the City's obligations with respect to the 1992A Certificates;
(g) an escrow deposit and trust agreement, by and between the City and the
Escrow Bank, relating to provision for the payment of the City's obligations with respect
to the 1992B Certificates; and
(h) an escrow deposit and trust agreement, by and between the City and the
Escrow Bank, relating to provision for the payment of the City's obligations with respect
to the 1993 Certificates.
Section 2. The Council hereby approves the Preliminary Official Statement, in
substantially the form on file with the City Clerk, together with any changes therein or
additions thereto deemed advisable by the Mayor, the City Manager, the Director of
Administrative Services, or the designee of any such official. The Council authorizes and
directs the Mayor, the City Manager, the Director of Administrative Services, or the
designee of any such official, to deem "final" pursuant to Rule 15c2-12 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Rule") the Preliminary Official Statement prior to
its distribution by the City's financial advisor.
Section 3. The City's financial advisor, on behalf of the City, and the Mayor, the
City Manager, the Director of Administrative Services, or the assignee of any such
official, are authorized and directed to cause the Preliminary Official Statement and the
Notice of Sale to be distributed to such municipal bond broker-dealers, to such banking
institutions and to such other persons as may be interested in purchasing the Certificates
therein offered for sale.
Section 4. The Mayor, the City Manager, the Director of Administrative Services,
or the designee of any such official, is authorized and directed to cause the Preliminary
Official Statement to be brought into the form of a final official statement (the "Final
Official Statement") and to execute the Final Official Statement, dated as of the date of
the sale of the Certificates, and a statement that the facts contained in the Final Official
Statement, and any supplement or amendment thereto (which shall be deemed an original
part thereof for the purpose of such statement) were, at the time of sale of the Certificates,
true and correct in all material respects and that the Final Official Statement did not, on
the date of sale of the Certificates, and does not, as of the date of delivery of the
Certificates, contain any untrue statement of a material fact with respect to the City or
omit to state material facts with respect to the City required to be stated where necessary
to make any statement made therein not misleading in the light of the circumstances
under which it was made. The Mayor, the City Manager, the Director of Administrative
Services, or the designee of any such official, shall take such further actions prior to the
signing of the Final Official Statement as are deemed necessary or appropriate to verify
the accuracy thereof. The execution of the final Official Statement, which shall include
such changes and additions thereto deemed advisable by the Mayor, the City Manager,
the Director of Administrative Services, or the designee of any such official, and
Resolution No. 02-174 Cupertino City Council Page 4
such information permitted to be excluded from the Preliminary Official Statement
pursuant to the Rule, shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of the final Official
Statement by the City.
Section 5. The Final Official Statement, when prepared, is approved for
distribution in connection with the offering and sale of the Certificates.
Section 6. The Mayor, the City Manager, the Director of Administrative Services,
or the assignee of any such official, is authorized and directed to execute the Notice of
Sale on behalf of the City and to call for bids for the sale of the Certificates. The Mayor,
the City Manager, the Director of Administrative Services, or the assignee of any such
official, is hereby delegated the authority to accept the best responsible bid for the
purchase of the Certificates, determined in accordance with the Notice of Sale. The
Mayor, the City Manager, the Director of Administrative Services, or the assignee of any
such official, is hereby authorized and directed to accept such bid, for and in the name of
the City, by notice to the successful bidder. In the event two or more bids setting forth
identical interest rates and premium, if any, are received, the Mayor, the City Manager,
the Director of Administrative Services, or the assignee of any such official, may exercise
his or her own discretion and judgment in making the award and may award the
Certificates on a pro rata basis in such denominations as he shall determine.
The Mayor, the City Manager, the Director of Administrative Services, or the assignee of
any such official, may, in his or her discretion, reject any and all bids and waive any
irregularity or informality in any bid. The Mayor, the City Manager, the Director of
Administrative Services, or the assignee of any such official, shall award the Certificates
or reject all bids not later than 26 hours after the expiration of the time prescribed for the
receipt of proposals unless such time of award is waived by the successful bidder.
Section 7. The firm of E. Wagner & Associates, Inc., Pleasanton, California, is
hereby retained as financial advisor to the City in connection with the execution and
delivery of the Certificates. The Mayor, the City Manager, the Director of Administrative
Services, or the assignee of any such official, is hereby authorized and directed to execute
an agreement for financial advisory services with such firm. The firm of Quint &
Thimmig LLP, San Francisco, California, is hereby retained as special counsel to the City
in connection with the execution and delivery of the Certificates. The Mayor, the City
Manager, the Director of Administrative Services, or the assignee of any such official, is
hereby authorized and directed to execute an agreement for legal services with such firm.
Section 8. In accordance with the provisions of section 37351.5 of the California
Government Code, the Council hereby elects to guarantee the lease payments required to
be made under the Lease Agreement from moneys credited to the Motor Vehicle License
Fee Account in the Transportation Tax Fund to which the City is entitled under Chapter 5
(commencing with section 11001) of Part 5 of Division 2 of the California Revenue and
Taxation Code. The Mayor, the City Manager or the Director of Administrative Services,
or the assignee of any such official, shall, prior to execution of the Lease Agreement,
provide notice to the State Controller of such election, which notice shall include a
schedule for payments to be made by the City under the Lease Agreement and shall
Resolution No. 02-174 Cupertino City Council Page 5
identify the Trustee as the trustee selected by the City for the purposes of such section. In
the event that, for any reason, the funds otherwise available to the City will not be
sufficient to make any payment under the Lease Agreement at the time that payment is
required, the Mayor, the City Manager or the Director of Administrative Services, or the
assignee of any such officials, shall so notify the Trustee which shall immediately
communicate that information to the affected owners of the Certificates and to the State
Controller.
Section 9. The Mayor, the City Manager, the Director of Administrative Services,
the City Clerk and all other appropriate officials of the City are hereby authorized and
directed to execute such other agreements, documents and certificates as may be
necessary to effect the purposes of this resolution and the financing herein authorized.
Section 9. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption by this Council.
I, the undersigned City Clerk of the City of Cupertino, hereby certify that the
foregoing is a full, tree and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the City Council
of the City at a meeting thereof on the 16th day of September, 2002, by the following
vote of the members thereof:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Kimberly Smith, City Clerk
Richard Lowenthal, Mayor
CITY OF
CUPEP TINO
City Hall
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Telephone: (408) 777-3220
FAX: (408) 777-3366
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
Agenda Item No..A
SUMMARY
Meeting Date: September 16, 2002
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Cupertino Public Facilities Corporation
· Adopt Resolution Approving, Authorizing and Directing Preparation and Execution of Certain Lease
Financing Documents and Authorizing and Directing Certain Actions with Respect Thereto.
BACKGROUND
The City has been moving forward on the Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), which includes a
new public library estimated to cost $22 million dollars. As part of financing this CIP, it is now time to
issue approximately $15 million of new debt. Also, the City is a member of the Silicon Valley Animal
Control Joint Powers Authority (the "JPA"). The JPA is in the process of building an animal shelter
facility to be located in Santa Clara. The City's portion of the cost of the facility is estimated to be
approximately $1 million dollars. It is recommended that the City issue Certificates of Participation for a
total of $16 million to provide financing for the library project and the new animal shelter. The City
previously issued and currently has outstanding Certificates of Participation as follows:
Par mount par mOunt Final
Ori~naily ~rrenfly Annual Debt Matufi~
Issue Date ISSued Ou~tanding Se~Ce Date
1992 Refunding, Series A 12/1/92 $10,785,000 $ 7,760,000 $ 820,000 7/1/2016
1992 Refunding, ScricsB 12/1/92 $14,585,000 $ 7,875,000 $ 1,325,000 7/1/2010
1993 Refunding, Series A 12/1/93 $ 36,900,000 $ 26,735,000 $ 2,780~000 7/1/2016
TOTAL $ 62,270,000 $ 42,370,000 $ 4,925,000'
Annual debt service decreases to $3,600,000 after 7/1/2010 when the 1992 Refunding, Series B Certificates mature.
PrintedonRecyc/edPaper
The City can refinance these Certificates (collectively the "Prior Certificates") in today's market, keep the
same amortization of the obligations and realize the following reductions in annual payments.
Annual Pa~ent Annual Payment:
Deseriptlon ?/II2003-2010:7/II2011-711/2016
Prior Certificates $ 4,925,000 $ 3,600,000
Refunding Certificates 4,129,000 3,010,000
Annual Savings $ 796,000 $ 590,000
Therefore, the total nominal dollars savings from the refunding of the Prior Certificates would be
approximately $9,860,000. The present value of these future savings would be $3,170,647 for a net
present value savings as a percentage of the outstanding Certificates of 7.72%. The industry rule of
thumb is that anytime the net present value exceeds 3% the City should undertake the refunding. Because
the City had previously advance refunded the Prior Certificates in 1992 and 1993, under current tax law,
the City must wait until the Prior Certificates can be current refunded before the City can undertake a
refunding of the Prior Certificates. The definition of a current refunding is that the refunded obligation
can be defeased within ninety-days of the issuance of the refunding obligation. The Prior Certificates are
able to be current refunded anytime after October 1, 2002.
The voters of Cupertino recently passed an extension of the utility tax to July 1, 2030. The purpose of the
tax was to fund the library and other capital facility needs of the City. By refunding the Prior Certificates
and adding $16 million of new money to the amount of Certificates, the City is able to provide the
funding needed for the library and the City's portion of the animal shelter and keep its annual debt service
payments at approximately $3,650,000 per year until 7/1/2030. By structuring the Certificates in this
manner, the City will leverage its debt and ensure an annual collection of utility taxes under the current
Ordinance to help pay for the debt.
Financing Structure
To proceed with the financing, City Council will need to approve executing certain legal documents
including a Lease Agreement, a Trust Agreement, and Escrow Agreements; authorizing the competitive
sale of the certificates and directing the Director of Administrative Services to accept the lowest bid;
approving the Official Statement in substantially final form; and authorizing other related actions in
connection with the financing. These documents are described in more detail below. It is also necessary
for the Cupertino Public Facilities Corporation (the "Corporation") to adopt a resolution and direct the
execution of certain legal documents.
Related to the actions described above, a draft copy of the Preliminary Official Statement and other bond
documents are available for review in the City Clerk's Office.
The transaction is being structured as a 30-year, fixed rate certificate issue. As discussed above, the
Certificates will be sold through competitive bid with the Certificates being awarded to the underwriter
with the lowest total interest cost.
in an effort to ensure the lowest borrowing costs for the City and to ensure a future commitment to the
payment of the annual debt service on the certificates, the financing team explored several financing
structures. This analysis included considering bond insurance and participating in the State Intercept
Program. Insurance protects the certificate holders and lowers interest costs but is an additional expense
for the city. The Intercept program assures timely payment, but also carries a fee. Discussions are still
underway with the bond insurance companies. The transaction should be approved for bond insurance
and for the purchase of a surety bond to replace the cash reserve fund, further reducing the amount of
Certificates to be issued and the resulting annual debt service. Additionally, staff is recommending that
this financing be structured to include participation in the State Intercept Program.
Under provisions of Section 37351.5 of the California Government Code, the City can further secure the
annual lease payments by providing a mechanism by which the State Controller makes payments directly
to the Trustee from the vehicle licensing fees in the event of a payment default on the certificates. The
City is entitled to these fees under Sections 11001-11005 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code.
Under the provisions of the State Intercept Program, the City Council must notify the State Controller of
the election to have the fees "intercepted" by the Trustee at the time of certificate closing. The State
Controller only makes payments to the Trustee after the City fails to pay lease payments under the Lease.
The State reduction in the amount of vehicle licensing fees to be allocated to the City is reduced by the
same amount of funds advanced to the Trustee for lease payments. The actual diversion of vehicle
licensing fee revenue by the State to the Trustee would only occur if the city failed to make lease
payments to the Trustee which would likely only occur if there were insufficient General Fund revenues
available to make lease payments.
There are generally two advantages to municipalities in electing to use the State Intercept Program as
outlined below:
The possibility exists of attracting bond insurance companies to the transaction who might otherwise
choose not to insure this transaction because of the perceived risks associated with a General Fund
appropriation lease debt. Bond insurance would reduce the interest rates by approximately 20 basis
points throughout the maturities providing a net savings in annual debt service.
A policy issue exists associated with pledging revenue received from the State through the Motor
Vehicle License Fee. Staff believes a pledge of Motor Vehicle License Fees ("MVLF") revenue
through the State Intercept Program makes it politically more difficult for the State to divert funds,
which have been pledged for City debt service payments. However, the State is not legally prohibited
from diverting MVLF revenues. The City currently receives approximately $3 million per year in
Motor Vehicle License Fee revenue.
Certificate Documents
By resolution, the Corporation will approve the following documents that are on file with the City Clerk:
Site and Facility Lease. The Site and Facility Lease is between the City and the Corporation. This
is the agreement that leases the Property Premises (i.e., Memorial Park, Quinlan Community Center
and other properties, etc.) to the Corporation. This agreement specifies the terms and conditions for,
the lease of the Property Premises.
Lease Agreement. This agreement is between the Corporation, as lessor and the City, as lessee. The
agreement specifies the terms and conditions of the lease of the Property Premises, term of payments,
amount of payments, responsibility for the maintenance of the Property Premises during the term of
the agreement.
Assignment Agreement. This agreement is between the Corporation and BNY Western Trust
Company, (the "Trustee"). In this agreement the Corporation assigns substantially all its rights under
the Lease Agreement to the Trustee. For example, rather than the City making semi-annual lease
payments to the Corporation and the Corporation paying the Certificate holders, the City will make its
lease payments directly to the Trustee an the Trustee will pay the Certificate holders.
Trust Agreement. The Trust Agreement (the "Agreement") is between the Corporation, the City and
the Trustee and contains the terms and conditions regarding the Certificates. Pursuant to the
Agreement, the Trustee is given the authority to receive, hold, invest and disburse the monies paid to
it for credit to the various funds and accounts established under the Agreement; to execute the
Certificates; and to apply and disburse payments to Certificates Owners. It sets forth the guidelines
for the administration, investment and treatment of investment earnings generated by each fund and
account. The Agreement obligates the City to pay compensation to the Trustee for services rendered
under the Agreement.
Escrow Agreements. These documents are between the City and BNY Western Trust Company as
the Escrow Bank for the Prior Certificates. The Escrow Agreements (the 1992 A Escrow Agreement,
the 1992 B Escrow Agreement and the 1993 Escrow Agreement) provide for the receipt and
investment of the monies to defease the Prior Certificates on their first call date of January 1, 2003.
Notice of Intention, Official Notice of Sale and Bid Form. These documents provide the necessary
notice to the underwriting community regarding the sale of the Certificates and the manner in which
the firms must submit their bid for the purchase of the Certificates on a competitive bid basis.
Preliminary Official Statement. This document is the public offering statement for the issuance of
the Certificates. This document thoroughly describes the financing program, the public
improvements to be financed, the economic, financial and social characteristics of the City and the
Corporation.
Continuing Disclosure Certificate. This agreement is signed by the City and satisfies the recently
adopted SEC rules regarding continuing disclosure for the issuance of Certificates (SEC Rule 15c2-
12(b)(5)). Thc agreement obligates the City to continue to provide information regarding the City,
the Corporation and the Certificates to the secondary (Certificate) market as long as the Certificates
are outstanding.
Financing Team Participants
City Staff has been working with the necessary consultants to bring this financing to the Council for
approval. Included in the Resolution that Council is being asked to adopt is the authorization fi.om
Council for Staff to enter into agreements for consulting services with the following firms in the
following capacities:
Name of Firm
Quint & Thimmig LLP
E. Wagner & Associates, Inc.
BNY Western Trust Company
Role
Special Counsel
Financial Advisor
Trustee
All fees associated with this financing will be paid fi.om Certificate proceeds.
Financine Schedule
The following is the financing schedule:
Date of:
September 16~'
September 16th
September 17a'
October 1st
October 16a'
Description of Activity
· Council Adopts the Resolutions Authorizing Sale of Certificates and Approval of
Legal Documents
· Receive Rating and/or Bond Insurance
· Print and Mail Preliminary Official Statement, Official Notice of Sale and Bid
Form.
· Sale of Certificates
· Certificate Closing-Delivery of Certificate Proceeds to the City and Funding of
Escrow to Defease Prior Certificates on January 1, 2003
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends the Cupertino Public Facilities Corporation adopt the following resolutions:
· Adopt Resolution Approving, Authorizing and Directing Preparation and Execution of Certain Lease
Financing Documents and Authorizing and Directing Certain Actions with Respect Thereto.
Submitted by:
Approved for submission:
Carbl A. Atwood
Treasurer
David W. Knapp
Executive Director
DRAFT
CUPERTINO PUBLIC FACILITIES CORPORATION
RESOLUTION NO. 02-001
RESOLUTION APPROVING, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
PREPARATION AND EXECUTION OF CERTAIN LEASE
FINANCING DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING CERTAIN ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO
RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Cupertino Public
Facilities Corporation (the "Corporation"), as follows:
WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino (the "City") has heretofore entered into a lease
agreement, dated as of December l, 1992 (the "1992A Lease"), with the Corporation to
refinance the acquisition, construction, installation and equipping of capital facilities
within the geographic boundaries of the City originally financed in 1986 (the "1992A
Project"), relating to $10,785,000 Certificates of Participation (1992 Refunding, Series
A) (the "1992A Certificates");
WHEREAS, the City has also heretofore entered into a lease agreement, dated as
of December 1, 1992 (the "1992B Lease"), with the Corporation to refinance the
acquisition, construction, installation and equipping of capital facilities within the
geographic boundaries of the City originally financed in 1989 and 1990 (collectively, the
"1992B Project"), relating to $14,585,000 Certificates of Participation (1992 Refunding,
Series B) (the "1992B Certificates");
WHEREAS, the City has also heretofore entered into a lease agreement, dated as
of April 1, 1993 (the "1993 Lease" and, with the 1992A Lease and the 1992B Lease, the
"Prior Leases"), with the Corporation to refinance the acquisition, construction,
installation and equipping of capital facilities within the geographic boundaries of the
City originally financed in 1991 (the "1993 Project" and, with the 1992A Project and the
1992B Project, the "Prior Projects"), relating to $36,600,000 Certificates of Participation
(1993 Refunding, Series A) (the "1993 Certificates" and, with the 1992A Certificates and
the 1992B certificates, the "Prior Certificates");
WHEREAS, the City, working together with the Corporation, proposes to enter
into a lease financing and in connection therewith to (a) undertake the refinancing of the
Prior Projects, refinance the City's obligations under the Prior Leases, and provide for the
refunding and defeasance of the Prior Certificates, and (b) finance a portion of the
acquisition, construction, installation and equipping of new City public library;
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest and for the public benefit that the
Corporation authorize and direct execution of certain financing documents in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, the documents below specified shall be filed with the Corporation
and the members of the Board, with the aid of its staff, shall review said documents;
Resolution No. 02-001 Page 2
Cupertino Public
Facilities Corporation
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED and DETERMINED, as follows:
Section 1. The below-enumerated documents, substantially in the forms on file with the
Secretary, be and are hereby approved, and the President, the Executive Director or the
Treasurer, or any designee thereof, is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
documents, with such changes, insertions and omissions as may be approved by such
official, and the Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to attest to such official's
signature:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
a termination agreement, by and among the Corporation, the City and
BNY Western Trust Company, as successor to First Interstate Bank of
California, as trustee for the 1992A Certificates, providing for the
termination of the legal documents relating to the 1992A Certificates;
a termination agreement, by and among the Corporation, the City and
BNY Western Trust Company, as successor to First Interstate Bank of
California, as trustee for the 1992B Certificates, providing for the
termination of the legal documents relating to the 1992B Certificates;
a termination agreement, by and among the Corporation, the City and
BNY Westem Trust Company, as successor to First Interstate Bank of
California, as trustee for the 1993 Certificates, providing for the
termination of the legal documents relating to the 1993 Certificates;
a site and facility lease, between the City, as lessor, and the Corporation,
as lessee;
a lease agreement, by and between the Corporation, as lessor, and the City,
as lessee (the "Lease Agreement");
an assignment agreement, by and between the Corporation and BNY
Western Trust Company, as trustee (the "Trustee"), pursuant to which the
Corporation will assign certain of its rights under the Lease Agreement,
including its right to receive lease payments thereunder, to the Trustee;
and
a trust agreement, by and among the Corporation the City and the Trustee,
relating to the financing, and the execution and delivery of the
Certificates.
Section 2. The President, the Executive Director, the Treasurer, the Secretary and other
officials of the Corporation are hereby authorized and directed to execute such other
agreements, documents and certificates as may be necessary to effect the purposes of this
resolution and the lease financing herein authorized.
Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption by the Board.
Resolution No. 02-001 Page 3
Cupertino Public
Facilities Corporation
I, the undersigned Secretary of the Cupertino Public Facilities Corporation, hereby certify
that the foregoing is a full, tree and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the
Board of Directors of the Corporation at a meeting thereof on the 16th day of September,
2002, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Kimberly Smith, Secretary
Richard Lowenthal, President
City I-Iall
i 10300 Torte Avenue
~ Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
(408) 777-3354
CITY OF FAX: (408) 777-3333
CUPE INO
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Summary
AGENDA ITEM .~k- ~:~ 7
AGENDA DATE September 16~ 2002
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a contract with Apple Computer, Inc. for
the disposal of consumer electronics products and computers (e-waste) in an amount not to
exceed $25,000 and authorize funding for the contract from the Resource Recovery Fund, in the
amount of $25,000.
BACKGROUND
E-waste or electronic waste is one the fastest growing waste problems occurring today. The
California Environmental Protection Agency (CAEPA) has recently determined that cathode ray
tubes (CRTs) are hazardous waste and unsafe to dispose of in landfills. CRTs are identified as
hazardous waste mainly due to the levels of lead in the CRT. The lead in the CRT of a computer
monitor or a TV is incorporated into the glass, and there is a possibility that, under certain
environmental conditions, the lead in a CRT can leach out of the glass and contaminate
groundwater. Potential exposure may be through drinking lead-contaminated water, or
consuming food grown in areas with lead-contaminated soil.
Current Disposal Options
This determination by CAEPA has limited disposal and recycling options for CRTs, and has
increased the cost of disposal. Currently, residents of Cupertino have the option of requesting a
special pickup from Los Altos Garbage for a cost of $50 per CRT or taking them to one of a few
recyclers in the area. It has also become increasingly difficult to donate electronic equipment to
charitable organizations. Landfills are accepting them for a fee of $15 to $25 and sending them
to recyclers for reuse or recovery. There is also a concern over what recyclers are doing with the
e-waste. Earlier this year, a report was released expressing concern over exports of computer
waste to unregulated communities in other countries where open burning, acid baths and toxic
dumping pollute the land, air and water, exposing the population to the toxins in the waste.
Printed on Recycled Paper
Proposal from Apple Computer
Apple Computer, Inc. has developed a program to dispose of and recycle e-waste and has
proposed to provide an environmentally responsible opportunity for residents of Cupertino to
recycle end-of-life computers and consumer electronic products. Apple already has an existing
facility where they reuse, deconstruct and recycle electronic waste. Under this proposal, Apple
will accept, at its facility on Bubb Road, electronic items that residents wish to dispose of in an
environmentally responsible manner.
Apple is using a process designed to divert up to 90% of the end-of-life materials received
through the program from landfills to other beneficial uses through reuse or recycling.
Under this program, which is proposed as a six-month pilot project between Apple and the City,
Apple will accept computer equipment, selected office electronics and some home entertainment
electronics. For the 6-month pilot period, hours of operation are anticipated to be Monday,
Wednesday and Friday from 8am to 4:30 pm. Apple will provide the labor for tracking and
processing of the materials collected, at no charge to the City or residents.
The City will be required to cover the costs of the disposal of non-working, non-reusable
computer monitors. The expected price is $0.25-$0.45 per pound for monitor disposal (the
average weight of a monitor is 30 pounds). The City is proposing to fund this pilot program in an
amount not to exceed $25,000. Staff and Apple will evaluate the program, if approved by the
Council, and report back to Council with appropriate recommendations in the spring of 2003.
Apple has assured the City they will only be hiring vendors that dispose of waste in an
environmentally friendly manner.
RECOMMENDATION
Adoption of Resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement
with Apple Computer, Inc. for the disposal of electronic products and computers (e-waste) in an
amount not to exceed $25,000, and authorize funding for the contract from the Resource
Recovery Fund in the amount of $25,000.
Submitted by:
Approved for submission:
Ralph A. Qualls, Jr.
Director of Public Works
David W. Knapp
City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 02-175
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A
CONTRACT WITH APPLE COMPUTER, INC. FOR THE DISPOSAL OF
CONSUMER ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS AND COMPUTERS (E-WASTE) 1N AN
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $25,000 AND AUTHORIZING FUNDING FOR THE
CONTRACT FROM THE RESOURCE RECOVERY FUND IN THE AMOUNT OF
$25,000
WHEREAS, the California Environmental Protection Agency has determined that
cathode ray tubes are hazardous waste due to levels of lead and it is unsafe to dispose of
them in landfills; and
WHEREAS, E-waste or electronic waste is the fastest growing waste problem
facing cities today; and
WHEREAS, Apple Computer, Inc. has developed a program to dispose of and
recycle e-waste and has proposed to provide an environmentally responsible opportunity
for residents of Cupertino to recycle end-of-life computers and consumer electronic
products.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Cupertino hereby authorizes an agreement for a six-month pilot project between Apple
Computer, Inc. and the City of Cupertino for the disposal of e-waste.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council authorizes the City Manager
to negotiate and execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Cupertino.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 16th day of September, 2002, by the following vote:
Vote
Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
CITY OF
CUPEI TINO
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
FAX (408) 777-3333
Community Development Department
Summary
Agenda Item No. OQ ~
Agenda Date: September 16, 2002
SUBJECT:
Discuss maintenance at the Loree Center, 10029 Judy Avenue and consider an
application for Alcoholic Beverage License, Loree Liquors, 19050 Stevens Creek
Boulevard.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council
1. Discuss maintenance at the Loree Center
2. Approve the Alcoholic Beverage License for Loree Liquors
3. Direct staff to continue pursuing the sign ordinance, outside storage, graffiti
and storage trailer code violations
BACKGROUND
On August 19, 2002, the City Council discussed the Loree Center application for an
Alcoholic Beverage License for Loree Liquors. The City Council requested that staff ask
the property owner to attend a future City Council meeting to discuss maintenance at
the center.
DISCUSSION
Staff visited the Loree Center and noted there are maintenance problems at the Center,
several of which require code enforcement (see the attached photographs). A letter has
been sent to the property owner regarding the following violations or potential
violations:
Temporary banners: A temporary banner permit is required for the banners and
pennants on the Home Concepts store.
Tenant signs: A sign program may be needed, since the sign ordinance requires
a sign program when the first tenant in the project requests a change of face. A
sign program specifies standards for consistency among all signs within a
development.
Storage trailers: Storage trailers are not allowed because commercial activity
must be conducted entirely within a building.
Pnnted on Recycled Paper
Loree Center
September 16, 2002
Page 2
Outside storage of materials: The loose materials shown (mattresses, pallets) in
the parking lot are not allowed. Commercial activity must be conducted entirely
within a building.
Graffiti: Graffiti is located on the trailer and building wall.
Staff spoke with the property owner, Mr. Nick Kouretas, about the City Council's
concerns, and sent him a letter requesting that he attend this meeting. Mr. Kouretas
requested that this item be heard toward the beginning of the City Council meeting. He
also raised the point that he is willing to comply with code requirements as long as they
do not pertain to conditions allowed while under County jurisdiction. Staff believes
that the above code requirements pertain to current conditions.
Staff will continue to work with the property owner to secure compliance with the code.
Prepared by: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner
Submitted by:
Steve Piasecki
Director of Community Development
Approved by:
David W. Knapp
City Manager
Enclosure:
Alcoholic Beverage Control permit
G:\ Planning\ PDREPORT\ CC\ Loree Center.doc
2
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S)
ABC 211
State oi' California
TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
100 Pasco dc San Antonio
Room 119
San Jose. CA 951 t3
(408)277-1200
DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION:
First Owner:
Name of Business:
Location of Business:
County:
Is premise inside city limits'?
Mailing Address:
(If different from
premises address)
Type of license(s): 21
Transferor's license/name:
File Number: 390067
Receipt Number: 1379751
Geographical Code: 4303
Copies Mailed Date: July 3, 2002
Issued Date:
SAN .IOSE
KIM MYOUNG SUK
LOREE LIQUORS
19050 STEVENS CREEK BLVD
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
SANTA CLARA
Yes
Census Tract 5081.02
366352 /CHOI JOONG BO Dropping Partner: Yes
No
License Type Transaction Type Fee Type Master Dup Date Fee
21 OFF-SALE GENERAL PERSON TO PERSON TRANSF NA Y 0 0 7 / 0 3 / 0 2 $ ! .274.00
21 OFF-SALEGENERAL ANNUALFEE NA Y 0 07/03/02 $473.00
30 TEMPORARY PERMI DUPLICATE NA N I 07 / 0 3 / 0 2 $ 100.00
21 OFF-SALE GENERAL STATE FINGERPRINTS NA N 2 0 7 / 0 3 / 0 2 $78.00
Total $1,925.00
Have you ever been convicted of a felony? No
Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, or regulations of the
Department pertaining to the Act? No
Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application.
Applicant agrees (al that any manager employed in an on-sale licensed premise will have all the
qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the
provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SANTA CLARA Date: July 3, 2002
Under penalty of perjury, each person ~vhose signature appears below, certifies and says: (I) He is an applicant, or one of the applicants, or an
executive officer of the applicant corporation, named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf: (2) that
he has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true; (3) that no person other
than the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in the applicant or applicant's business to be conducted under the licensetsl for
which this application is made; (4} that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an
agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer application is filed with the Department or to gain or
establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure any creditor of transferor; (5) that the transfer application may
he withdrawn by either the applicant or the licensee with no resulting liability to the Department.
KlM MYOUNQ SUK
mlm SUNG CHUL
CITY OF
CUPE INO
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3308
FAX (408) 777-3333
Community Development Department
Summary
Agenda Item No. ,.~c~
Agenda Date: September 16, 2002
SUBJECT:
Review development regulations affecting Randy Lane and Larry Way Neighborhood
(Al Zoning District).
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
1. Authorize staff to work with the neighborhood to determine a preferred
action;
2. Consider enacting an interim ordinance affecting new construction in the
neighborhood;
3. Provide any additional direction to staff regarding the approach to design
standards in this neighborhood.
BACKGROUND
The subject neighborhood is located on Larry Way and Randy Lane, between Lucille
Avenue and Merritt Drive. Interstate 280 runs along the north side of the neighborhood
and Apple Campus is adjacent to the west.
Most of the neighborhood was built in 1951 and was later part of the original
incorporation of the City of Cupertino in 1955. The neighborhood has retained its
original County of Santa Clara zoning designation of A143 Agricultural Residential
Zone (referenced as Al), which requires one-acre lot sizes at a minimum. The area
consists of 68 single-family homes on lots that average 10,000 sq. ft. (0.22 acres) in size,
making all of the lots legal non-conforming due to insufficient lot size. Property owners
may still build on the non-conforming lots.
The standard single-family residential zone in the City is the R1 Single Family
Residence Zoning District (referenced as R1). R1 zones have minimum lot sizes ranging
from 5,000 sq. ft. to over 10,000 sq. ft. In the past, residents of this neighborhood have
opposed rezoning to the R1.
Printed on Recycled Paper
Review development regulations affecting Randy Lane and Larry Way Neighborhood (Al Zoning D/strict).
September 16, 2002
Page 2
DISCUSSION
In the last few years, about a half dozen major additions and remodels have occurred in
this area. These projects included second-story additions and ground floor additions
with substantially increased wall-and-building heights. The R1 zoning ordinance was
amended in 1999 to address mass and bulk issues, but the A1 zoning ordinance was left
untouched. Thus, the A1 zone does not have design regulations or design review. As a
result, these building permits were issued without any discretionary review and
without any neighborhood notification.
During the construction of these past projects, staff received numerous phone calls from
affected neighbors who objected to the design and massing of the new development.
Unfortunately, based on A1 regulations, staff had no authority to request modifications
to make these developments compatible with the neighborhood. Had this
neighborhood been in the R1 zoning district, the applicant would have to redesign their
plans to improve its neighborhood compatibility.
On September 4, 2002, a new building permit proposal was submitted to the
Community Development Department. The project is a major addition and remodel
including a large second story and massive design elements with no privacy screening.
This project is not consistent with the design regulations and guidelines that are applied
through the majority of the City's single-family residential neighborhoods.
Anticipating concern from the neighborhood, staff requests authorization to begin a
dialogue between the neighborhood and the City, to discuss the benefits and drawbacks
of the current regulations and to explore options for potential changes to provide
design controls that are typical for other single-family neighborhoods in the City.
Interim Ordinance
Section 65858 of the California Government Code allows the City Council to pass an
interim ordinance prohibiting new construction (moratorium) if the situation
necessitates immediate action.
Instead of prohibiting all development, staff proposes a temporary rezoning of the
neighborhood from A1-43 to P(A1). The new zoning will be a Planned Development
with Agricultural/Residential intent. Development regulations will include the A1 and
R1 regulations, whichever specific regulation is more restrictive. Staff recommends that
the Design Review Committee review all additions at a noticed, public hearing.
The objectives of the interim ordinance are to protect the neighborhood from additional
development with mass and bulk that is incompatible with the predominant pattern in
the neighborhood and protect individual residents from privacy intrusions from two-
Review development regulations affecting Randy Lane and Larry Way Neighborhood (Al Zoning Dist~ic0.
~ptember 16, 2002
Page 3
story development while staff works with the neighborhood to detetx-~tine the
appropriate regulations for their neighborhood.
An interim ordinance is in force for 45 days, after which the City Council may choose to
extend the ordinance for another 10 months and 15 days at a noticed public hearing. If
the interim ordinance is not extended, it will be voided and the previous A1-43 zoning
and regulations will be restored. While the interim ordinance is in effect, staff proposes
to work with the neighborhood to craft appropriate regulations to protect their
interests.
Characteristics of Proposed Home
The recently submitted project conforms to the A1 zoning ordinance, and has legal non-
conforming side setbacks like most dwellings in the neighborhood. The home
incorporates design characteristics that are inconsistent with standards that are
applicable to other single-family neighborhoods.
characteristics:
· 45% FAR; ·
· Second story is 68% of the first story;
· Ten second-story windows with ·
views of neighboring yards without ·
privacy screening;
The home has the following
Minimal second story wall offsets,
setbacks;
22'9' entry feature height;
Single-story walls with 16'6" height.
Staff has requested that the project applicant revise their drawings to reduce some of
the visible mass and provide some privacy screening. It is hoped that with the
cooperation of the project applicant, the active building permit application can be
"pipelined" and the interim ordinance can be modified to apply to future proposals.
Prepared by:
Colin Jung, Senior Planner
Peter Gilli, Associate Planner
Ste~e Piasecki -
Director of Community Development
Approved by:
David W. Knapp
City Manager
Enclosure:
Model Interim Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO. 1902
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CUPERTINO AMENDING TITLE 19 OF THE CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE
BY ADOPTING INTERIM MEASURES TO IMMEDIATELY REZONE
APPROXIMATELY 9.7 ACRES, CONSISTING OF SIXTY-EIGHT SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENCES, FROM A1-43 AGRICULTURAL-RESIDENTIAL ZONE
TO THE P(A1) PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONE WITH AGRICULTURAL-
RESIDENTIAL INTENT AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN
the following:
Chapters: 1. Findings
2. Purpose
3. Definitions
4. Regulations
5. Appeal
6. Enforcement
7. Expiration
CHAPTER 1. Findings.
In order to protect the public safety, health and welfare, this ordinance is adopted
as an urgency interim ordinance pursuant to Government Code section 65858. It
is important to safeguard the uniqueness of sixty-eight single-family residences on
Randy Lane and Larry Way between Lucille Avenue and Merritt Drive, herein
referred to as the "Neighborhood." The "Neighborhood" is predominantly
comprised of single-story homes on large lots, preserving privacy between homes.
New development that is out of scale and incompatible with the existing
neighborhood is detrimental to the welfare of the "Neighborhood," and
inconsistent with Policy 2-15 of the Cupertino General Plan. There is at least one
pending application for a building permit to do a major addition, including a
second story, which will be approved unless this interim ordinance is adopted.
It is therefore determined, by the City Council, that this ordinance shall become
effective immediately upon adoption pursuant to Government Code sections
36394 and 36937. This ordinance will remain effective for forty-five days after
adoption unless extended pursuant to Government Code section 65858(a).
Ordinance No. 1902
CHAPTER 2. Purpose.
The purpose of this ordinance is to protect the aesthetic character of the
"Neighborhood" and the privacy of its residents, while the City works with
"Neighborhood" residents to determine the appropriate design regulations that
will be incorporated into a permanent ordinance.
CHAPTER 3. Definitions
"Addition" means any construction that increases the size of a building or facility
in terms of site coverage, height, length, width or gross floor area.
CHAPTER 4. Regulations
The regulations for this Planned Development zone are as follows:
1. New construction and additions shall be iieveloped in accordance with the
site development and design standards specified in Section 19.20.060 in the
A1 Agricultural-Residential ordinance, or Sections 19.28.060 through
19.28.130 in the R1 Single Family Residential ordinance, whichever specific
regulation is more restrictive.
2. Requests for additions shall be made to the Design Review Committee for
design approval to allow for the development, subject to Chapter 19.28.080,
19.28.090 and 19.28.110 of the Cupertino Municipal Code, except that all
additions must receive a special pem-.it.
CHAPTER 5. Appeal
All determinations and decisions by the Design Review Committee ~under this
Chapter are subject to appeal to the Planning Commission under the procedures
described in Section 19.136 of this title.
CHAPTER 6. Enforcement
1. Any person who violates any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished as provided
in Chapter 1.12 of the Cupertino Municipal Code.
2. The City Attorney may maintain an action for injunctive relief to restrain a
violation or cause, where possible, the complete removal of any addition
constructed in violation of this chapter.
CHAPTER 7. Expiration
This ordinance shall automatically expire upon the effective date of a permanent
ordinance or 45 days from the date of enactment of this ordinance, whichever
comes first unless pursuant to Government Code 65858.
Ordinance No. 1902
INTRODUCED and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Cupertino this 16th day of September, 2002, by the following vote:
Vote
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Members of the Ci_ty Council
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
CITY OF
CUPERTINO
City Hall
10300 Tone Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Telephone: (408) 777-3223
FAX: (408) 777-3366
www.cupertino.org
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
SUMMARY
Agenda Item No.--~
Meeting Date: September 23, 2002
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Consider canceling the meeting of January 6, 2003
BACKGROUND
Staff recommends that the City Council cancel its January 6 meeting because typically the first
meeting in January has a light agenda, and because the holiday schedule in December interferes
with packet preparation.
Regular Council meetings are held on first and third Mondays, and the packets are printed and
delivered on the prior Wednesday.
In January, the regular Council meeting falls on January 6. If a packet were to be prepared for the
January 6 meeting, it would have to be distributed by Thursday, December 19, which is 19 days
prior to the meeting (see attached calendar).
A special meeting can be called to address any items of importance that may arise, but staff will
make every effort to get any necessary actions ready for the second meeting in December or the
second meeting in January.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Cancel the January 6 regular meeting
2. Call a special meeting January 13 or later, if necessary
Submitted by:
Kimberly Smit~j
City Clerk
Approved for submission:
a;p
City Manager
Prmteo on Recycled Paper ~0 -- I
DECEMBER 2002 - JANUARY 2003
Sun Mon Tues Wed Thur Fri
1 2 3 4 5 6
regular
Council
meeting
8 9 10 11 12 13
15 16 17 18 19 20
regular
Council
meeting
22 23 24 25 26 27
City Hall City Hall
closed for closed for
HOLIDAY HOLIDAY
29 30 31 1 2 3
city Hall City Hall
closed for closed for
HOLIDAY HOLIDAY
5 6 7 8 9 10
cancel Staff retreat Staff retreat
Council re annual re annual
meeting? goals goals
12
special
19 20 21 22 23 24
Council
meeting
26 27 28 29 30 31
CITY OF
CUPEI TINO
City Hall
10300 Torte Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
Telephone: (408) 777-3213
FAX: (408) 777-3109
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES
DIVISION OF HUMAN RESOURCES
SUMMARY
Agenda Item No.
Meeting Date: September 16, 2002
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
First reading of Ordinance No. lq03: An ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino
authorizing an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of Cupertino and
the Board of Administration of the California Public Employees' Retirement System to enhance
1959 survivor benefits.
BACKGROUND
The City of Cupertino does not belong to the Social Security system. Survivor benefits available
through social security are provided by CalPERS and are known as the 1959 Survivor Benefit.
On August 19, 2002, the City Council adopted a resolution of intention authorizing the
enhancement of 1959 survivor benefits. Pending approval of the attached ordinance, this benefit
enhancement will commence on November 18, 2002.
FISCAL IMPACT
The employer cost for the recommended benefit enhancement is set for the next five years at $5.00
per month per active employee (approximately $9,400 annually). The employee cost for the next
five years is set at the existing rate of $2.00 per month ($0.93 per pay period).
Submitted by: Approved for submission:
Sandy Abe
Human Resources Manager
David W. Knapp
City Manager
DRAFT
ORDINANCE NO. 1903
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION
OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino does not belong to the Social Security system;
WHEREAS, employee survivor benefits are provided by CalPERS and are known as the
1959 Survivor Benefit;
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Resolution of Intention on August 19, 2002 to
provide enhanced, fourth level 1959 Survivor Benefits;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That an amendment to the contract between the City Council of the City of
Cupertino and the Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System is
hereby authorized, a copy of said amendment being attached hereto, marked Exhibit, and by such
reference made a part hereof as though herein set out in full.
Section 2. The Mayor of the City Council is hereby authorized, empowered, and directed
to executive said amendment for and on behalf of the City of Cupertino.
Section 3. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption,
and prior to the expiration of seven (7) days from the passage thereof shall be published at least
once in the Cupertino Courier, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the
City of Cupertino and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.
INTRODUCED at a regular adjourned meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the
16th day of September 2002 and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino the __ day of 2002, by the following vote:
Vote
Members of the City Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Cupertino
EXHIBIT
CalPERS
California
Public Employees' Retirement System
AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT
Between the
Board of Administration
California Public Employees' Retirement System
and the
City Council
City of Cupertino
The Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System,
hereinafter referred to as Board, and the governing body of the above public agency,
hereinafter referred to as Public Agency, having entered into a contract effective August
16, 1967, and witnessed July 10, 1967, and as amended effective June 1, 1973, March
1, 1974, December 22, 1976, December 18, 1978, June 17, 1981, December 30, 1981,
September 19, 1991, January 7, 1993, March 9, 2000, June 2, 2000 and February 16,
2001 which provides for participation of Public Agency in said System, Board and Public
Agency hereby agree as follows:
Ao
Paragraphs 1 through 13 are hereby stricken from said contract as executed
effective February 16, 2001, and hereby replaced by the following paragraphs
numbered 1 through 13 inclusive:
All words and terms used herein which are defined in the Public
Employees' Retirement Law shall have the meaning as defined therein
unless otherwise specifically provided. "Normal retirement age" shall
mean age 55 for local miscellaneous members and age 55 for local safety
members.
Public Agency shall participate in the Public Employees' Retirement
System from and after August 16, 1967 making its employees as
hereinafter provided, members of said System subject to all provisions of
the 'Public Employees' Retirement Law except such as apply only on
election of a contracting agency and are not provided for herein and to all
amendments to said Law hereafter enacted except those, which by
express provisions thereof, apply only on the election of a contracting
agency.
Employees of Public Agency in the following classes shall become
members of said Retirement System except such in each such class as
are excluded by law or this agreement:
a. Local Fire Fighters (herein referred to as local safety members);
b. Local Police Officers (herein referred to as local safety members)'
Co
Employees other than local safety members (herein referred to as
local miscellaneous members).
In addition to the classes of employees excluded from membership by
said Retirement Law, the following classes of employees shall not become
members of said Retirement System:
NO ADDITIONAL EXCLUSIONS
After March 1, 1974 and prior to January 1, 1975, those members who
were hired by Public Agency on a temporary and/or seasonal basis not to
exceed 6 months were excluded from PERS membership by contract.
Government Code Section 20305 supersedes this contract provision by
providing that any such temporary and/or seasonal employees are
excluded from PERS membership subsequent to January 1, 1975.
The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of
credited prior and current service for local miscellaneous members shall
be determined in accordance with Section 21354 of said Retirement Law,
subject to the reduction provided therein for service on and after
December 31, 1981, the effective date of Social Security coverage, for
members whose service has been inclUded in Federal Social Security
(2.5% at age 55 Full and Modified).
o
The percentage of final compensation to be provided for each year of
credited prior and current service as a local safety member shall be
determined in accordance with Section 21366 of said Retirement Law
subject to the reduction provided therein .for Federal Social Security (One-
half pay at age 55 Modified).
Public Agency elected and elects to be subject to the following optional
provisions:
ao
Section 21222.1 (One-Time
miscellaneous members only.
effective January 1, 1980.
5% Increase - 1970) for local
Legislation repealed said Section
Section 20965 (Credit for Unused Sick Leave) for local
miscellaneous members only.
Co
Section 20614, Statutes of 1978, (Reduction of Normal Member
Contribution Rate). From December 18, 1978 and until June 17,
1981, the normal local miscellaneous member contribution rate
shall be 3.500%. Legislation repealed said Section effective
September 29, 1980.
Section 20690, Statutes of 1980, (To Prospectively Revoke Section
20614, Statutes of 1978) for local miscellaneous members only.
Section 20042 (One-Year Final Compensation) for local
miscellaneous members only.
Section 21024 (Military.Service Credit as Public Service), Statutes
of 1976 for local miscellaneous members only.
go
Section 21023.5 (Public Service Credit for Peace Corps or
AmeriCorps: VISTA Service) for local miscellaneous members only.
Section 21574 (Fourth Level of 1959 Survivor Benefits) for local
miscellaneous members only.
Section 21583 (Additional Opportunity to Elect 1959 Survivor
Benefits) for local miscellaneous members only.
Public Agency, in accordance with Government Code Section 20790,
ceased to be an "employer" for purposes of Section 20834 effective on
December 22, 1976. Accumulated contributions of Public Agency shall be
fixed and determined as provided in Government Code Section 20834,
and accumulated contributions thereafter shall be held by the Board as
provided in Government Code Section 20834.
10.
Public Agency shall contribute to said Retirement System the contributions
determined by actuarial valuations of prior and future service liability with
respect to local miscellaneous members and local safety members of said
Retirement System.
11. Public Agency shall also contribute to said Retirement System as follows:
ao
Contributions required per covered member on account of the 1959
Survivor Benefits provided under Section 21574 of said Retirement
Law. (Subject to annual change.) In addition, all assets and
liabilities of Public Agency and its employees shall be pooled in a
single account, based on term insurance rates, for survivors of all
local miscellaneous members.
A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one
installment within 60 days of date of contract to cover the costs of
administering said System as it affects the employees of Public
Agency, not including the costs, of special valuations or of the
periodic investigation and valuations required by law.
A reasonable amount, as fixed by the Board, payable in one
installment as the occasions arise, to cover the costs of special
valuations on account of employees of Public Agency, and costs of
the periodic investigation and valuations required by law.
12.
Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be
subject to adjustment by Board on account of amendments to the Public
Employees' Retirement Law, and on account of the experience under the
Retirement System as determined by the periodic investigation and'
valuation required by said Retirement Law.
13.
Contributions required of Public Agency and its employees shall be paid
by Public Agency to the Retirement System within fifteen days after the
end of the period to which said contributions refer or as may be prescribed
by Board regulation. If more or less than the correct amount of
contributions is paid for any period, proper adjustment shall be made in
connection with subsequent remittances. Adjustments on account of
errors in contributions required of any employee may be made by direct
payments between the employee and the Board.
This amendment shall be effective on the ~.Sth day of ~tovembe:r'
2002
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM CITY OF CUPERTINO
BY BY
KENNETH W. MARZION, CHIEF
ACTUARIAL & EMPLOYER SERVICES DIVISION
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
PRESIDING OFFICER
Witness Date
Attest:
Clerk
AMENDMENT
PERS-CON-702A(Rev. 8\96)
CITY OF
CUPE INO
City Hall
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014-3255
(408) 777-3354
FAX: (408) 777-3333
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM -~k ~,::~,
AGENDA DATE September 16~ 2002
SUBJECT AND ISSUE
Informational Report Weekly Recycling Service Options and Costs
BACKGROUND
During Council Goals discussions in January of 2002, Council considered the possibility
of offering weekly recycling services to Cupertino residents and using the Resource
Recovery Fund to fund the program. However, the status of the Resource Recovery fund
was somewhat uncertain at that time, owing the dispute with International Disposal
Corporation (IDC) regarding disposal fees.
After some preliminary research into options, including a request for optional proposals
from Los Altos Garbage Company (LAGCO) the City's contract solid waste hauler, in
the Spring of 2002,, it was again discussed by the Council during the review of the 2002-
2003 Operating Budget in June of 2002. Staff advised Council at that time resolving the
dispute with IDC was imminent, and, if successful, staff could then report to Council, on
specific options and costs for weekly recycling, including specific information provided
by LAGCO, as well as the current status of the reserve fund. This report is provided for
your information.
Existing Recycling Pro,am:
The City's residential curbside recycling service provides every other week, unlimited
pickup. Residents are afforded two, 18-gallon recycling bins and may set out as much
recycling as they want, using their own additional containers as necessary. The City is
divided into two sections by Stelling Road. The east side receives recycling services one
week and the west side the following week. The City also provides yard waste service on
the same recycling day. Residents are provided a 96-gallon cart and may purchase service
for additional carts for a minimum of a three-month period.
Printed on Recycled Paper
Status of Reserves:
Assuming approval of the proposed settlement with IDC, the Finance Department reports
that following the settlement payments, as of the beginning of this fiscal year, the
Resource Recovery fund will have approximately $ 5 million in reserves.
It has been city policy to maintain $1 million in the fund for any liability the City may
incur for furore landfill costs associated with cleanups from pollution or contamination. It
is also prudent to have a minimum of $500,000 as a contingency for additional unknown
regulatory costs or for development of other recycling programs to ensure compliance
with the State requirements (50% diversion).
The current available reserves after these set-asides would be approximately $ 3.5 million
as follows:
Resource Recovery Reserve Fund
Balance as of July 1, 2002
Liability Reserve
Contingency reserve
$ 5,000,000
(1,000,000)
(500,000)
(est.)
Balance Available
$ 3,500,000 (est.)
The fund is also projected to accumulate approximately $500,000 annually in the next
few years.
RECYCLING OPTIONS
As a practical matter, although several variations were explored with LAGCO, there are
essentially two basic options to provide weekly recycling services to Cupertino residents.
Each option assumes that the Resource Recovery Reserve Fund would fund the new
service as opposed to raising residential garbage rates. Additionally, the costs were
calculated for the entire 7-year period remaining in the LAGCO contract. These options
are, in summary:
Option One: Automated Recycling, Yard Waste and Garbage
Total Cost (7 years) = $4.32 Million
Option Two: Expansion of Existing Biweekly Service to Weekly
Total Cost (7 years) = $8.12 Million
Attachment A to this report outlines these costs in more detail. A brief description of the
two service options and the implications of each are described below.
OPTION ONE: Automated Weekly Recycling, Yard Waste and Garbaue Service
Automated collection for garbage and recycling requires 32, 64 or 96 gallon wheeled
carts. Automation allows drivers to stay in the truck for the most part, while an automatic
arm picks up the cart. One cart would be for single-stream commingled recyclables and
the other for garbage. The City would retain existing carts for yard waste. In reality, this
program will not cost any more in disposal fees and residents will find recycling easier.
This program can be funded without raising rates through reserves and on-going
accumulation of funds in the Resource Recovery Fund for the life of the City's contract
with Los Altos Garbage, which is 2010. The total cost for the seven-year service,
including an initial cost for the one-time purchase of automated containers, is $4.32
Million.
However, a major drawback to this approach, while ultimately the best approach, is that
there are currently no processors in this area that can handle single stream recyclables
from Cupertino. There are two processors that started handling San Jose's material,
effective July 1, 2002, and they are fully occupied with that effort.
If the City wishes to pursue this approach, LAGCO expects that sometime after the initial
startup period in the San Jose program, it is likely that single stream recycling processors
will want to increase their tonnage and could accept material from Cupertino.
A compounding problem is that LAGCO has indicated that it could take up to one year to
order and receive trucks and equipment, and to train operators for the new system. It does
not seem to be prudent to embark on an investment in equipment upgrades and training
for the single stream recyclable system until there is an established and dedicated
resource for the processing of single stream recyclable material.
In conclusion, this option is clearly the best approach for the City in the future, but the
above factors present significant obstacles for implementation in the near future.
OPTION 2: Expansion of Recvcline and Yard Waste Services from Biweekly to
Weekly Pickup Using Existing System:
The current system utilizes the same tracks and crew for each week alternating between
the two routes as noted above. An increase to weekly pickup service requires twice as
many recycling tracks and drivers as are currently in use.
This option requires purchasing an additional 4 recycling trucks and 2 yardwaste trucks,
using older technology and equipment. Drivers will continue to service containers
manually and dismount the tracks in all cases.
The cost for this option, including amortizing the cost of additional equipment is $8.12
Million, which substantially exceeds the available reserve fund. As such Option 2 would
require some combination of raising rates as well as using reserve funds. Additionally, it
could take up to six months or more to acquire the additional equipment to implement the
weekly service.
RECOMMENDATION
This Report is for The Council's information and no action is required.
Submitted By:
Director of Public Works
Approved for Submission:
David W. Knapp
City Manager
ATTACHMENT 'A'
WEEKLY RECYCLING OPTION COST DETAILS
OPTION ONE: Automated Weekly Recycling, Yard Waste and Garbage Service
LAGCO's costs for this option are $3.17 per month, per can. This cost also includes paying the City
franchise fees and disposal fees mounting to 41 °A of the total revenue, per our agreement with LAGCO.
Costs could be further reduced if the City were to pay for the program from reserves in a monthly lump
sum, and avoid the process of LAGCO paying the City our percentage of gross revenues, which would
also avoid increased franchise fees. LAGCO's proposed monthly cost increase could then be reduced
from $3.17 to $1.87 per can for purposes of comparison. In order for this program to be offered to
residents at no cost, the city would need to pay upfront $1,335,922 for purchase of carts for garbage and
recycling. Costs for service annually, using LAGCO's proposal and including a 4% estimated cost of
living increase, are as follows:
Carts $1,335,922
Year 1 $ 377,674
Year 2 $ 392,780
Year 3 $ 408,492
Year 4 $ 424,831
Year 5 $ 441,825
Year 6 $ 459,498
Year 7 $ 477,878
Total $4,318,900
OPTION TWO: Expansion of Current Weekly Recycling Service to Biweekly Service
Los Altos Garbage Company has estimated the additional cost per month, for weekly
recycling and yard waste to be $7.36 per month, per can. Added to the current $17.22
one-can rate, the monthly rate would be raised to $24.58. This rate is higher than any
other city in the county. If we were to remove franchise fees and disposal fees amounting
to 41% of total revenue, the increase in costs could be further reduced from $7.36 to
$5.09 per can. Funding the service at no cost (i.e., using reserve funds and without raising
the rates) including a 4% cost of living increase annually, would cost as follows:
Year 1 $1,027,493
Year 2 $1,068,593
Year 3 $1,111,336
Year 4 $1,155,790
Year 5 $1,202,021
Year 6 $1,250,102
Year 7 $1,300,106
Total $8,115,441