Loading...
U-1990-17 (modified)City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3202 Telephone: (408) 777-3223 FAX: (408) 777-3366 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK December 8, 1994 American Personnel Services, Inc. 11010 North DeAnza Boulevard Cupertino, California 95014 CITY COUNCIL ACTION - REVIEW OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL LICENSE FOR CHEVRON GAS STATION,11010 NORTH DEANZA BOULEVARD At their regular meeting of December 5, 1994, the Cupertino City Council removed this item from the agenda. This item will be placed on the agenda for review when a use permit for concurrent sales of vehicle fuel and alcoholic beverages has been approved. If you have any questions or need any information, please contact the Department of Community Development. Sincerely, KIM MARIE SMITH CITY CLERK KS/cs cc: Department of Community Development Department of Public Works rm,r.,.,r: rr,,, -n I`.. OF C*4 of Cuperti"o 10300 Torre Avenue Cupmino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 2524505 IA%: 1400) 252.0753 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT October 12, 1993 Robert H. Lee & Associates Robert Picard 1137 North McDowell Blvd. Petaluma, California 94954-1469 Subject: PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION LETTER - APPLICATION 17-13-90 (Modified) This letter confirms the decision of the Planning Commission, given at the regular meeting of October 11, 1993, approving a use permit according to the enclosed copy of the Planning Commission Resolution No. 4477. Please note these conditions carefully. Subsequent submittal of materials for building permits or other entitlements will be checked for compliance with the conditions listed in the Resolution; discrepancies may result in processing delays. Please contact our office if you have questions about this matter. Please be aware that an appeal of this decision can be made within fourteen working days of the decision. If this occurs, you will be notified of a public hearing which will be scheduled before the City Council. Sincerely, Michele Biter nan Community Development Department Enclosure Resolution No. 4477 g:W\IcttrnUt17u90m 17-U-90 (Modified) CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 4477 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A USE PERMIT TO MODIFY THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF AN APPROVED SALES BUILDING, CAR WASH AND CANOPY AND ADD ONE PARKING SPACE SECTION 1: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Coavnissiom of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use hermit, as described on Page 1 of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that tic application meets the following requirements: a) That the use or uses are in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Cupertino, and are not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. b) That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use. c) That the proposed use will generate a level of traffic over and above that of the capacity of die existing street system. d) That die proposed use is othenvisc not detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed uses, not injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, tic application for Use Permit is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which arc enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof, and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application 17-U-90 (Modified) as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Mating of October 11, 1993, and arc incorporated by reference though fully set forth herein. SECTION If: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: 17-U-90 (Modified) Applicant: Robert H. Lee & Assoc. Property Om icr. Cupertino De Oro Club Location: 11010 De Auza Boulevard USE PERMIT to modify the square footage of an approved sales building, car wash and canopy and add one parking space. Resolution No. 4477 17-U-90 (Modified) October 11, 1993 Pagc-l- SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY'CHE PU13LIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I. APPROVED CONDITIONS All Public Works conditions as outlined in die City Council Action letter of March 20, 1991, remain in full effect. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF �+ ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS (Section 66474.18 California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section III of this Resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices. Bert Viskovich Bert Viskovich, City Engineer SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT 2. APPROVED CONDITIONS All Community Development Department conditions of March 20, 1991, remain in full effect unless otherwise modified by the following conditions. 3. ATPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation of approval is based on Sheet 1 dated revised September 17, 1993, Sheet 1.1 dated revised September 17, 1993, Sheet 2 dated revised September 17, 1993, Sheet 3 dated revised September 16, 1993, Sheet 4 dated September 17, 1993, and Sheet 5 dated September 18, 1993. 4. APPROVED USE The subject use permit authorizes the construction and operation of a single -stall car wash, food market, and fueling stations as depicted on the exhibits listed in Condition 3 above. Equipment installed in the car wash structure shall replicate the sound generation characteristics described in the Fitzroy/Dobbs study of 01/24/91 and 03/1 I/91. 5. IGS NAGE The Chevron logo and text located on the spanner boxes are denied. Resolution No, 4477 17•U-90 (Modified) October 11, 1993 Page-3- 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION City Council action letter of March 20, 1991, Condition No, 17 (tandscapingaree Preservation) shall be amended as follows: Staff shall approve the final landscaping plan and tree preservationlreplaccment plan. The tree prcscrvation plan should be certified by a qualified arborist and should be specific to the site. Replacement of specimen trees removed should be made on a one -for -one basis with min. 36" box size California Native varieties. Condition No. IS (Sign Program) is replaced with Condition No. 5 of this Resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED this IIth day of October, 1993, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Bautista, Doyle, Mahoney, Roberts and Chairwoman Austin NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None ATTEST: /s/ Robert S Cowan Robert S. Cowan Director of Community Development 0mMrcrrwW17u9om APPROVED: Isl Donna Austin Donna Austin, Chairwoman Cupertino Planning Commission ,—co .— .i 8AFiAnM-S ,Nt1 &E ROAD EX AWA 1XV. .a w.. orouno. a, nv.�erwrwv .v m AWN LK APPROVED CITY COUNCIL �'.�eww., u,..nm .s....a....., n �•�• Signed Date on ............. —ao.v.os. PLA:ININ i2di5S, .............aa —conit �� �. ........ .....Paei A �... .... ........... . .01e6 r• eR �d0� Date J b �3 ®......... ,....w� er.nor ARCH. & SiT. CON; ._....... . A. eel epics wr.u-A fD •OIe.• ............ .m YYs tl a^ • e" O' Signed Date eel ®ra•or te, QQ we wi�eme ra (�F RAC tlen cumpom CA 61wR %ON I.' 1 s uo. 1 a a O o 96 SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE ROAD -----------DEANZABLVD. ------------ APPROVED cliY COUNCIL Signed Date PLAI NINE- '-C ' N•I;SSION Signe Date 10 1 < < l `7�I 3 ARCH. & SiT.c CO:i'MOL Signed Date ................ — .—...........•.io DAM" a-cowa ml. -M .............aaour �1lIRO11 �rt..le Ai• - -------------- wt nL" -ll..� •Door r r - - r..lt - .r�. sTuow vnrrt / / _ - 10 10 Q.alal NOIt crt'r FRONT SLEVATICH A .� �. REAR ELEVATION C KI wewa�uwnantoeruna 0 i 1 � � d A • i AN 4 p MplMit SIAYUIm ���» '(� Utrr�•. wR �/ ■L[ 1U(IUrfqOn Il a gait _ ry/ - 1 IlA AM piny -_... •..•:. _...: :'•-.::••:: 1Ipp P�400aUfflDo" •:. Iwr "::: _:: •..tr',:•i`:.:: r:__; ';':"� / / M WD- 04 STUCCO TONR A SM B-EVA7M B ca1P'Oao a .lu Tau m r ow v v.wsl Tt2 - r.oa.. snxco ro lu Sri ior - IIyL sTusO TpT l [ am- - A to-0Nal 1 K - - - u+..w fnTllucfan ►utt WE ELEVATION D Fel fCPm MAFA S I r . >mlg. rarl N• f•.rnP w.0 /AR f scam SOUTN FACE swT I!Q lCTYMN AA rww fast E2YAl10N-som MA 8MCWAtLKVAWN CITY Cou,, lL Signed A10 noan.rfr c, - Acma ::: A I Ilvc rnoorsvn aATa cocaTol 77 9 N\od zn_ D r" m CWT - Date 0-oA =CRAM ti�eliwa A 7-4 1 .. • • - .:.�.. -_. .... �. d.-.�-,.'�.•.yy,.>a_;F.�,. s. a., ��_ �,.' - ..��'Y_..?R" - ..Ara, t w w . wlo wal xv; w'w..eiwt • •w%smWI r•w r w tr000'1 w�1 iouir. � ' . t U - uwt owl S." _•. sum wift • r.sw v1-w.R - i wr. i. • aurt.��m �f�A"LLY 1�{� r rs � DMr oRt wrw.la - rro au[ O.w� aat lnwCW r ptt.wR ccL tMto �� BI+w MY 4K.L4 tY>t wcwu= I= owe-" yr-wR Itw +U CANOPY FRCMf ELEVATION CANOPY SIDE ELEVATION ` auw e mw ttn�uow OS a tw3e+ .LLwa Polt- 71 It r. - � an• p1Olf QP�A11011 Ap GrJJWRi o71 Vta Zlodl= OIL" mml Emllill nox„u, APPROVED J. CITY COL1.CiL OX nwlelaa�w w Date P NINC Signed Date O LL Q 3 _I Trps _ Wo ARCS;. L S1 i �;ONTROL " - wR�� —.ows+�•.aaa.o Signed Date — � svxauar swsc CANOPY AND MONUMENT SM ELEVAT10NS •mao tw tumll w.0 uc we Oe AM ILM �0 ClfoRlgG Lbw wawa�iot �� � l�w..www Yi�Ktowo�°ww Itr11wu1 t11�d1 — rpm co-m — ni¢i /LORtl S MOI .IMB011 N WAToon-SUNNYVALE ROAD " DE AIQA BLVD. --------------------------- PROVED COUNCIL Signed Date P IN Ci:.a..iijSION Signe Date ARC . & Silo Qo(D,�TROL Signed Date LANDSCAPE RAN smom �a o� 1� a4kPATOGA-W#MALE ROAD DE ANZA BLVD. ' . R -rraa� 1 3c:Y;d3�� Y'i[iH� 1 I APPROVED CITY COUNCIL Signed Data PL.A: .,`;,E C': .,v1bIIES:ON Signe, Date 10 1 9 3 ARCH. f �.vZROL Signed Date (,» TMO{Olf PLAN ® 4 M1 Osr� ® V R Maul �O Iloa RUYR{ ORS Yr. 1 R• RMiAO UGHTM PLAN *rm OY Q RG �J6 WO1116 G pamm Cit4 of cuperti"o 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014.3255 Telephone: (409) 2524505 FAX: (408) 252-0753 DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY CLERK March 17, 1993 Robert Picard Robert H. Lee and Associates P. O. Box 750908 Petaluma, California 94975-0908 APPLICATION NO. 17-U-90 - CHEVRON RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY - REQUEST FOR A ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF A USE PERMIT FOR MINI- MART/CAR WASH FOR SERVICE STATION AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HOMESTEAD ROAD AND DEANZA BOULEVARD At their regular meeting of March 15, 1993, the Cupertino City Council granted a one year extension of your use permit to March 18, 1994. If you have any questions regarding this action, please contact the Department of Community Development staff members for clarification. Sincere) DOROTHY C RNELIUS, CMC CITY CLERK DC/cs cc: Department of Community Development Department of Public Works Philip LoSavio Cupertino Sanitary District 20065 Stevens Creek Blvd. Cupertino, CA 95014 ,A5cf. 010 art- 13 )X>*4 CITY OF C UPELRDTINO evelopment APPLICATION FORM Department 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 FAX (408) 252-0753 (408) 252-4505 APPLICANT/PROJECrSPONSOR KOBERT H. LE,E 6 ASSOC., INC. PHONE 707 765-1660 OF!rICEUSE ADDRESS 94954File N (s) PROPERTYOWNER CUPEWFINODE OR0 CLill}_ _ _ PHONE(415)949-69a7 PROJECT CONTACT PERSON KUl5hK I P WARD PHONE 7 _ ADDRESS - SAME AS APPLICANT FAX (707)76 --iq LOCATION OF PROJECT 11010 DE AN•rA it, vn- APN E.A.N DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL DEMOLISH ENTIRE SITE. INSTA1. NEW BUs1,DING ARWASH, ACREAGE DWELLING UNITS DENSITY PER GROSS ACRE SQUARE FOOTAGE (BLDG.) LOT COVERAGE (9, OF NET LOT AREA) FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) BUILDING HEIGHT PARKING -REGULAR -COMPACT -HANDICAPPED PAVIN EXISTING NET 0.782 GROSS I .')wl NONE N/A 2557 SQ. ef. 1% UNKNOWN 12'U" PROPOSED NET 0.782 GROSS 1 2t,� NONE: NEW 66�60 sa.it. OLD 6204 14% n2 1932 So. F^1 111.UG. I I'n"NOvv 21 UNKNOWN o UNKNOWNU -- NONE I -- 1t"A crl FT. 2U771 4 F1'. L.A.\D ® ROnERT H. LEM i AnS0C-jA'Ue 25% ANCr-rrrECfU na . aNO1NFERIWp . aFrylnpraiaEM�L l1M1l Gw --- u06 y;.W MISC CPf" DSq LLAI�S ❑ .\ ► GLKN P. �ownts +-USE Vv � ❑ 4PROJECT MANApER-SUE KD (, ❑ r ,ee.seeo AJOFI 3 5 ✓aQ `TtQ�YL�� ❑ R s t7071 76000e -US1 S l 4o 1 wrwn�, w w,ur�wro. w . wwvw. w� y M�xwa�.w -SIT MMUKArrt.l,-^it-o - ,-ZO ❑ -PARCEL MAP (14 LOTS) ❑ -U II crryll awnirmn -NI LLlvir. d Chevron U.S.A. Products Company -F• ❑ -P 2410 Camino Ramon. San Ramon. CA 94593 der -L Mail P.O. Box 5004, San Rom, CA 945"134 p Fhate 15101 842 9520. Fax (510) 842-9591 an Notes: Jim Lewin Constriction Maintenance Repeseriatme tsified based on the highest rating. West Central Region CERTff - I certify L_ rwledge and belief. I understand that a misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Planning Commission or City Council of this application. I tnderstaind that. •'•e application may be withdrawn if I or my authorized representative is not present at the scheduled meetings(s). or if a written request for postponement has been presented to the Planning Commission or affected review board. I have discussed this application with the Public Works' staff and I understand the public improvement re uq�ft' emencs gsocipted with this proposal. \ APPLICANTS I declare under 1 the above-descr PROPERTY ON I aq.L 6" 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino. CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 Cit%. of FAX (408) 777-3333 cupel'thio Community Development Department SUMMARY Agenda No. Agenda date December 5. 1994 The City Council discussed a request for an Alcoholic Beverage Control license application for Chevron Gas Station, 11010 North DeAnza Boulevard. The Council requested that staff report back to Council regarding whether alcohol sales are allowed from gas stations. • DISCUSSION State law states that no city "shall, by ordinance or resolution adopted on or after January 1, 1988, legislatively prohibit the concurrent retailing of motor vehicle fuel and beer and wine for off -sale consumption in zoning districts where the zoning ordinance allows motor vehicle fuel and off -sale beer and wine to be retailed on separate sites." The law further provides that "this section shall not prevent a city, county, or city and county from denying permission, or granting conditional permission, to an individual applicant to engage in the concurrent retailing of motor vehicle fuel with beer and wine for off -premises consumption and pursuant to a valid conditional use permit ordinance...: . In 1988, a Cupertino ordinance was approved which requires a conditional use permit for concurrent sales of motor vehicle fuel and alcoholic beverages. This regulation, Section 5.44, is enclosed. The Chevron Gas Station received a use permit in 1991 (17•U-90) for a new fuel station, condition 11 authorizes uses for a car wash, food market, and fueling stations. Approval was not granted for sale of alcoholic beverages. Therefore, Chevron would need to apply for and receive a use permit for this use prior to receiving an ABC license. Remove this item from the calendar until a use permit has been approved for concurrent sales of vehicle fuel and alcoholic beverages. Enclosure: Section 5.44, Cupertino Municipal Code Submitted by: Appr ved by: 4 5 ZZ C--C7uuQ,V� ' Robert S. Cowan Dt4n B Director of Community Development City Manager 'fPJJn PIC,,d Il.a Consent Calendar l MIN'TES OF THE MARCH 15, 1993, REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING (CC-85 POS ORAL - None. TIONS Mr. Bruce Ives, DistriePk offer of services at the fed 20, 3:00 p.m., in Cupertino Benjamin Kaufman, 867 Hyde home. The proposed addition how this could be prevented. i for for Anna Eshoo, introduced himself and presented an level. A town hall meeting isscheduled Saturday, March ncil Chamber. i A ue, said his neighbor is planning to build on to his viol his visual privacy and is an intrusion. He asked Mayor Szabo suggested he talk to Director of Community Development, Robert Cowan. Floyd Meyer addressed Council regar#ng the "church property". He stated the City could refund on their overcharging of ees. He expr�sed admiration for Counc. Dean for opposing the housing requirem placed on businesseswishing to expand. Mike Betz, editor of the Ctrf erlino Courier, said the paper, had gone to press today and did not fold. j CONSENT CALENDAR Mr. Meyer req(esstted that Item No. I be removed. It was moved by ounc. Sorensen, secondedbt�Counc. Koppel and passed unanimously to approve thance of the Consent ender as submitted. \ 1. / Removed from the Consent Calendar. 2. Application No. 17-U 90 - Chevron Research and Technology Company - Request for a one year extension of a use permit for mini-maWcar wash for service station at the northeast comer of Homestead Road and DeAnza Boulevard. Environmental Determination: Categorically Exempt Recommended for approval. 3. thly Activity Report, February, 1993._--- 4. Resolution 42: "A Resolution of the City cil of the City of Cupertino Allowing Certain and Demands Pa a in the Amounts and From the Funds as Hereinafter Des for nes and Wages for the Payroll Period Ending February 21, 1993." 2 0 0 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 1408) 252-i505 Summary AGENDA NO. AGENDA DATIZ_MaM 15.1993 SUBJECT Application No. 17-U-90 Applicant: Chevron Research/Technology Co. Property Owner: Cupertino De Oro Club Location: Northeast corner of Homestead Road and De Am Boulevard USE PERMIT request for a one year extension. BACKGROUND The City Council approved a conditional use permit at their meeting of March 18. 1991. The use permit authorized the demolishment of the former service station and reconstruction of a self-service fuel station with a single -stall car wash and food market The applicant is requesting a one year extension to the conditional use permit. as they have experienced delays in implementation and financing of the project RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of the one year extension to March 18, 1994. Enclosures: Applicant letter of February 17, 1993 City Council Action Letter of March 20. 1991 Site Plan A-1 dated 11/21M APPROVED `FORfSUBMTCTAL: 2� � i IA Robert S. Cowan Director of Community Development g =VeperWm17u90 7 FOR MTTTAL: (/- Dd)Q(IE6v.;I' City Manager NNING COMMISSION MINUTES ulcer Meeting of October 11, 1993 e Com. Bautista also spoke in favor of limiting the hours of operation on Friday evenings to 7 p.m. Chr. Austin stated that P.J. Mulligans causes the parking problem. She noted the applicant -,should work with the neighbors regarding the signs. She noted shelwould recommend approval of the school. The Commissioners briefly discussed the signs. Ms. Bjurman stated the applicant can use a sign up to 24 sq. ft. Ms. Wordell stated if the applicant requests a bigger sign he would need to come back to the Planning Commission for an exception. MOTION: Com. Mahoney moved to approve 9-i1-93 subject to the findings and subconclusions of the hearing with the following modification: Cond. 4, 'l-mit hours of . operation to 7 p.m. on Friday and Saturdaaq,rights. SECOND: Com. Roberts \\ VOTE: Passed 4=1 IJOES: Com. Bautista \' 5. Application No: 17-U-90 (Modified) Applicant: Robert N. Lee & Assoc. Property Owner: Cupertino De Oro Club Location: 11010 De Anza Blvd. USE PERMIT to modify the square footage of an approved sales building, car wash and canopy and add one parking space. Staff Presentation: Planner Bjurman presented the staff report noting in 1991 the applicant received approval for a car wash, mini- mart and fuel station. She stated the applicant is • requesting a modification to the 1991 use permit to lengthen the car wash and expand the mini -mart. She stated the modification will not result in changes to the original findings. Planner Bjurman reviewed the proposed changes. Regarding the blue fascia on the food mart, staff recommends that this be modified with stucco and a blue fascia cap as designed on the canopy. Regarding the canopy side elevation, it is staffs opinion that the spanner box is incompatible with the architecture and it is recommended that the request for lighting within the spanner boxes be denied. Ms. Bjurman stated the applicant is requesting 24 hour operation and staff is recommending denial. Regarding the sign on the car wash, staff believes that the sign is excessive and should be eliminated on the side elevation. Ms. Bjurman addressed the conditions of approval. Regarding the City Council action letter of March 20, 1991, coed 18 should be removed as it has been replaced with new condition 5. Condition 17, remove the wording after the first paragraph. She stated staff PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting of October 11, 1993 Paige 5 is recommending approval with the conditions outlined in the staff report. Chr. Austin opened the public hearing. npp scant Presentation: Mr. Steve Willard, Chevron Inc., stated that most of the changes proposed are to accommodate ADA requirements. Mr. Willard presented a drawing outlining the proposed changes noting the foot traffic to the mini -mart will be reduced because of the proposed card dispensers which will be installed. Mr. Willard stated he disagrees with staff regarding the blue fascia as this is Chevron's corporate identity. lie stated Chevron did a study to find out what the consumer saw to bring them into Chevron, and the result was, people saw the blue fascia. lie noted this is a recognizable trademark and stated he would also like to have the blue fascia above the canopy. • Mr. Willard stated the canopy lights are not sufficient enough to bring a safe environment at the point of purchase at the card dispenser. lie stated the spanner lighting proposed is a security issue and provides a safe environment for the consumer. Ile stated the spanner box also provides information to the motorist regarding smoking and turning off the engine and this is part of the reason for the internally illuminated lighting. Mr. Willard stated the Chevron logo is a corporate identity and would like to leave this as is. Com. Roberts questioned the visual impact and noise. Ms. Bjurman stated there are concerns regarding lighting which will be addressed at the final plan check stage. • Mr. Willard addressed the sound mitigation. Ile stated they will build an 8 ft. sound barrier between the adjoining apartments and the station. There are also sound walls on either side of the car wash which will mitigate the sound. Ile stated this was previously reviewed and approved. Regarding the lighting aspect, Mr. Willard stated the building will be 16 ft. high and the canopy will be 14 ft. high and any lighting under the canopy will be shielded. He noted the sound walls will be in place prior to operation. Regarding the separate car wash sign, Mr. Willard believes this sign is needed to limit confusion. Ile believes there would also be a loss in revenue from the car wash. Mr. Willard noted the signs would have to be reduced if combined. In response to Mr. Willard's question, Ms. Bjurman stated the sign under discussion is consistent with the ordinance, but site wide an exception is required for the total number and square footage of signs. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting of October 11, 1993 Page 6 Chr. Austin noted she received a letter from the neighbors regarding the location of the telephone and noise. Mr. Willard stated they will remove the telephone to staff's approval. fie believes that the layout of the station will mitigate the noise. Regarding the request for 24 hour operation, Mr. Willard believes that this is a safety issue. tie stated Chevron is making a substantial investment in this community. He noted his competitors are open 24 hours. Mr. Willard expressed concern about potential vandalism when the station is closed. He requested a one year trial period for 24 hour operation. In response to Com. Doyle's question regarding removal of trees, Mr. Willard stated most of the trees are in bad condition and need to be removed. Ile stated they will be replacing them with new trees. • Ms. Doris Ifijmans, De Oro Club, spoke in support of 24 hour operation as it will also provide protection for the De Oro Club. She addressed the landscaping between the Club and the Chevron station and noted this should be continued. Mr. Bernard Andrews, Portofino, stated the Planning Commission should consider whether the lighting proposed would affect the houses at Portofino. lie stated he objects to 24 hour operation, and if this is approved he would ask for a delay to give him time to talk to the homeowners association. Chr. Austin closed the public hearing. In response to Chr. Austin's question, Mr. Willard stated they would be willing to close the food mart and operate the fuel • service 24 hours. fie noted there would be a cashier on site 24 hours a day. The Commissioners agreed that the issues are as follows: Separate car wash sign (lours Spanner illumination Color Logos Telephone Com. Mahoney stated the separate car wash sign is acceptable; supports the trial period for 24 hour operation; leave the spanner box illumination as proposed; take logos off the spanner boxes; remove the telephone; and remove the blue fascia, as recommended by staff. Com. Bautista stated the hours of operation are critical and would vote to maintain the hours 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. He concurred with PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting of October 11, 1993 Page 7 Com. Mahoney regarding the other issues. Ile also believes that l.ight.ing would become a significant issue for the residents if operated 24 hours. Coin. Roberts spoke .in support of the blue fascia; supports the hours operation of 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. at this time; spanner box illumination is acceptable; logos not obtrusive; separate car wash sign not excessive. Coin. Doyle stated the City has a responsibility to the residents in the area and would leave the hours of operation at 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. Ile stated once the sound walls are in place the hours could be expanded; separate car wash sign is acceptable, but is concerned about the lighting of the sign; spanner box illumination is acceptable; relocate the telephone. Chr. Austin stated she has no problem with the blue fascia, spanner box illumination is acceptable; additional logos on spanners should be removed; 24 hour operation for gas station only on a temporary basis and after the sound wall has been constructed; separate car wash sign acceptable; relocate the telephone. MOTION: Coin. Mahoney moved to approve 17-U-90 subject to the findings and subconclusions of the hearing with the following modifications: Cond. 5, the Chevron logo and text located on the spanner boxes are denied; Cond. 6 remove last sentence; remove cond. 18 of City Council action letter of March 20, 1991 and modify Cond. 17, replace ASAC with staff and remove everything after the first paragraph. SECOND: Coin. Doyle VOTE: Passed 5-0 NEW ne61 ESS: - None � REPORT OP THE NING CoMMISSION: Chr. Austin no s recieved a newsletter om the Transportation Agency and encouraged a Commissioners read this. Com. Roberts noted he met w sta regarding truck traffic on liighway 85. Mr. Cowan stated there is a c (itrovers egarding truck traffic on Highway 87 and at this tim there is no p ibition against truck traffic. Fie noted some sidents are asking Jose City Council to prohibit the truck . Ile stated they have an a eemen7with he State regarding the rohibition of trucks on Highwa 5 REPORT OF DIRE OR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: - None OF TM Mai 18, 1991, RBGUTAR � MEErI IG (cc-809) Steven attorney, asked Cmmcil's proper authority for action. Fie ted that the Cupertino municipal code on is f new property and no improvements are ing on. If there is a section authorizing this acti he d be happy to look at it. Mr. Kilian stated has the authority of police power• Mr. Dennis said he /nothing to Mayor Lcoppel and that the public irag was closed. It was mgved/ by Counc. Sorensen, ky cou nt. Szabo aryl paw urw mously to adopt Resoluticl: No. 8343 and dir+ec,�t /staff to send certified copies to affe property d owneStaff is to put a reminder in a sti�ile to a notice to the post office prior to the of 18 The latter to request thatL�Xmail delivered if it has file old address on it. RECESS: 8:35-8:45 P.M. PLANNING APPLICATIONS c hearing d . 8343 adopted 19. Application No. 17-U-9O - Chevron ogy pp. 17-U-90, Co. - Use Permit to demolish an existing service hevron station and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 1,500 sq. ft. of building area encompassing a foot market and car wash, with related site b roverments. ` Zhe property is located on the northeast corner of Hawstead Road and Deknza Boulevard. Dwirormerrtal Determination: The Planning commission reocmnenas the granting of a Negative Declaration. Rsooamended for approval with conditions. Following the report from the Director of Comity Development, Mark Manos, Chevron Research and 'tbdmlcgy, addressed Council regarding trees and landscaping. He said he has worked with staff regarding the architectame and presented renderings and material samples of the development. Colors will be dark grey, light grey, blue and there will be a red mission the roof. Bill Dobbs, acoustical consultant, clarified the height of existing fencing and also existing noise oonditicns. camciv s questions involved level of service, trips, and trees to be removed. -7- 4 �1f 10300 Tone Avenue cu0•rrmo, Col cure 9 1 SUMMARY 4 , • - �t-' i f! �' •i USE PERM= to demolish existing service station improvements and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 1,500 s.f. of building area enxocapassing a food market and car wash, with related site improvements. oUs •• ya 'The parcel is consistent with the existing P(OG) Planned General dial zoning and "Coamercial" land use map designations. Since the proposed service station is defined as an Extraordinary Use, the required trip generation study demonstrated that the 25 trips/acre generated by the proposed project exceeds the 16 trips/acre standard expressed in Resolution 2996. However, the existing D level of service (IOS) conditions at the intersection of H c stead/De Anza would not charge due to project related peak hour trip activity. • III.MA7�0�2 ISSUES PUBLIC — At the first hearing, a representative from Mariani Development Co. expressed concern about the visual impact of the service station remodel on their nearby housing project. STAFF — Noise Protection: concern regarding potential for car wash machinery to mowed noise ordinance limitations and disturb occupants of the adjacent apartment omplex. —.Specimen Trees: Concern reg=dirg loss of large specimen trees on the site adjacent to the De Oro Club Building which helps define the historical setting of that structure. OF THE MARCH 18, 1991, REGULAR CITY CIL MEEIIM (CC-809) Steven DE", attorney, asked Council's groper authority for action. He ted that the Cupertino mmicipal code 1,section is P new property and no improvements are "going on. If there is a section authorizing this actid be happy to look at it. Mr. Kilian stated has the authority of police power. Mr. Dennis said hee bad nothing to Mayor Koppel that the public ing was closed. Public hearing closed It was d by Clxunc. Sorensen, Ctounc. Szabo and „nanimously to adopt Resolutiori No. 8343 and Res. 8343 adopted direct staff to send certified copies to afi property awnets. Staff is to put a reminder in a suspennda,,Pila to sepef a natios to the post office prior to the end of 18 Mie latter is to request that mail gti be ,;i. delivered if t has the old address an it. \ RECMSS: 8:35-8:45 P.H. PIANNIM APPLICATICILS 19. Application No. 17-U-90 - Chevron PteseardVTedujology App. 17-U-90, 00. - Use Permit to demolish an existing service Chevron station and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 1,500 sq. ft. of building area encompassing a foot market and car wash, with related site imps -cements. �r The Property is located on the northeast corner of ftnestead Road and Dakiza Boulevard. Enviroamiennta, Determination: Mns Planning Commission reo= ends the granting of a Negative Declaration. Reoammmnded for approval with conditions. Following the report from the Director of cxommmity Development, Mark Marls, Chevron Research and Technology, addressed council regarding trees and larxlscaping. He said he has worked with staff regarding the architec,bxm and presm*A3d renderings and material samples of the development. Colors will be dark grey, light gray, blue and there will be a red mission the roof. Bill Dobbs, acoustical consultant, clarified the height of outing fencing and also existing noise oonditiane. CoL=:Ll's questions involved level of service, trips, and trees to be remwwed. -7- DIINUIES OF 'nM MARCfi 18, 1991, REMMM CITY COUNCIL MEM'ING (CC-809) Neg. Dec. It was moved by Counc. Sorensen, seconded by Counc. Szabo granted and passed unanimously to approve the granting of a Negative Declaration. It was moved by Counc. Sorensen, secarded by Count. Rogers and passed unanimously to approve the application per Planning Ommission Resolution No. 4329. AND SITE APPROVAL OCHMr EE APPLICATIONS 20. N 0 21. None. NEW BUSINESS Somerset 22. Approval of Square Park renovati plan, i Park ren- Stokes Avent]e. ovation Kaz Abbey, presented 81 showing the and abuses that have occurred. He al showed a al of the master plan. In response to Council's glleSti , Dowling said that at this time, everything would be that is rot affected by the drought. It was moved by Cm=. , seconded Counc. Goldman and passed unanimously to pprwe the plan and authorize implementation f improvements t are not subject to drought coons and directed t trees be trimmed higher for of surveillance. Appt_ to 23. Approval of for recruitment and appo of advisory advisory board bodies It was moved Counc. Szabo, seconded by Counc. Rogers passed ly to approve the procedure for recruitment and the for interviews and appointments with amendmen as follows: One sentence was added to Item 1 stating that follow-up questions may be asked by other CouTM'il members during the interview. Item 5 will include an exhibit with suggested guidelines for the ramiber of ballots and number of applicants an which to vane. -8- 103M Tom Avenue Cuperil 14 4 M)M Pa SUMMARY J- �:*AJ vim:. • USE PE MT to demolish existing service station improvements and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 1,500 s.f. of building area encompassing a food market and car wash, with related site improvements. The parcel is consistent with the existing P(M) Planned General Commercial zoning and tlCrnmercial" land use map designations. since the proposed service station is defined as an and aordinary Use, the required trip generation study demonstrated that the 25 trips/acre generated by the proposed project exceeds the 16 trips/acre standard expressed in Resolution. 2996. However, the existing D level of service (IDS) conditions at the intersection of Homestead/De Anza would not change due to project related peak hour trip activity. • III.MMM ISSUES PUBLIC - At the first hearing, a representative from Mariani Development Co. expressed concern about the visual impact of the service station remodel on their nearby housing project. STAFF - Noise Protection: Concern regarding potential for car wash machinery to exceed noise ordinance limitations and disturb oom4nnts of the adjacent apartment complex. -.Specimen Trees: Concern regarding loss of large specimen trees on the site adjacent to the De Oro Club Wilding which helps define the historical setting of that stare. 06nLT=/s;mdaa a, rOTamm F4Tta» ;0 '1?a uemco g840Li --TIF7 __ n :TI11331alS tU CU&Oddcl zprqs TUT4Tui - T6/TT/CO ;O APn a -TON - uORenTP+S ee11 TQnPTATPul - qaS ueTd uor;wTTddK - T6/LZ/ZO Ps 'eP gnTO OZO 80 Lu=; a&439I - 6Z£U uOTgnTOsgd - '6Z£t, UQT:MTOMrd UT PE4743 SWTgTWW Pm SEuFPuT3 eq; 04 bxrP==m TV O.IddY L g •gtra=lOTeeep poombai GtP EPTM PO4EToOSSe s:peduT quenT;Tu6Ts w buTPuT; UOTgVzeToM anr�RBGM t? We-29 .. . •xaTd= cede et4 pue gnTO oz0 8Q atn 0,4 Wweo pe Mmroeds -=PT—P Pue *20 mg ..9£ tnTM quaauaotT(b3 euo .m; Ow P=Tnbai Pue ' (are , 0,4 UDTaTPIM Pooh UT ssadcud Z) IRTE94 TmTfi=u uT GOBOX4 M ;O Tom= PwzT=i:ne uDTSsTm=O 'Paq-uvsTPun uTemZ 0:4 04Ts GtP ;0 abpB gsM GtF4 ;0 9.= AOTTe cr� Tesocbui MMMO ue Ix 84Ts stP Pa=bT;uo08a xa&Tanap :saes umToadS - 'buTPTTni gsrft= etr4 ;0 swiT0d 4TX8 Pue fa4t- eai; &XWTOCPe snvABUTM 30 UOT4,eTTe4S+T Paxmbaa lxaT3ino Wuaa4iede qq4 0,4 gue lalpe WT=gq Amx)sen tl6Tq is ue ;o UD-PVTTw4suT paxp* z-1—Tott oT;;e-z4 Ag pmrsm sT esTou Ariz tptiat uat1M sautes esotp 0; uoTqu ado tpwt= ;o B=Ioq b 14MT s=T'.gpL= Pegod4 uOTssT-oO 'sasATVLrQ —TOu ea=q; buTMT--Ll X3rd :tm Osd —TON - NOISSIWWM ONffN Vrld ('P.Vxo) -III -Z - mod T6/ST/£0 06-12-LT NOLMl'Jd V - J;L1)m 7zvwwns n u • • PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting of March 11, 1991 Paqe 2 PUBLIC ❑EARINGS: 1. Application No(s): 17-U-90 and 25-EA-90 Applicant: Chevron Research/Technology Co. Property Owner: Cupertino De Oro Club Location: Northeast corner of Homestead Rd. and De Anza Blvd. USE PERMIT to demolish an existing service station and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 1,500 s.f. of building area encompassing a food market and car wash, with related site improvements. $tafg Preser�tati :: Mr. Mark Caughey presented the staff report showing graphics of the proposed site. He noted the applicant has made an attempt to replicate the forms and materials of the Portofino project on the adjacent corner. Fie noted Chevron has replaced a significant amount of the blue metal pump island canopy fascia with stucco treatment, and changes have been made to the columns following the Planning Commission's direction. Regarding the signs, staff has proposed that a small portion of the stucco may be deleted in favor of wood or painted metal as a backdrop for a sign. Regarding Landscaping, Mr. Caughey stated new trees have been added to the Homestead frontage and the north property line. lie noted the four conifers are not subject to removal, as stated in the staff report. Staff proposed the box specimen trees between the station and the apartments should be broad leaf evergreen for visual purposes. Mr. Caughey commented on the noise study noting the Sound Consultant will be present at this hearing for further discussion. Staff recommends the removal of the vacuum unit as it will create parking problems. Regarding Cond. 15 Mr. Caughey stated it will be rewritten to meet water conservation efforts. applicant Presentation: Mr. Mike Mannis, Chevron, noted the blue fascia had been reduced by 70 percent, added stucco texture and the column treatment has been revised. He noted a full landscape plan has been prepared and eight more trees have been added. Mr. Mannis noted that one additional parking space has been added to account for the vacuum unit and does not feel it will be a noise problem. Mr. Bill Dobbs, Acoustical Consultant, noted several studies have been done on this site. fie noted the stucco finish on the walls of the car wash will be adequate to reduce noise. As a follow up to the Commissioners concern regarding early morning operation on weekends, a recent study determined that traffic is masking the service station at the early morning hours. He noted it is appropriate to stay within 60 db range and also the City ordinance allows for overages. Mr. Dobbs went on to explain the noise study noting the noise level will be 6o db. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting of March 11, 1991 Page 3 In response to Cam. Mahoney's question regarding day -time and night-time hours Mr. Caughey explained that the car wash will be operating for 2 hours during the night-time hours. Mr. Dobbs explained the sound shadow and noted the wing wall has been extended which will shield the second floor of the apartments. In response to Cam. Mann's question regarding the intent of the Noise Ordinance allowing overages, Mr. Cowan stated the ordinance allows flexibility. Cam. Mahoney suggested restricting the car wash to a PM to meet the required db for night-time hours. The public hearing was opened. In response to Cam. Austin's question regarding the vacuum unit, Mr. Caughey stated staff felt this would cause a stacking problem and is an expansion beyond what was originally meant to be. Cam. Mann spoke in favor of the landscaping and the replacement of trees. She felt ASAC should have the final say for the signs. Chr. Mackenzie closed the public hearing. Cam. Mann expressed concern regarding the number of pumps stating she would like to see four. She noted there is not enough parking to accommodate the vacuum unit. Cam. Mahoney felt G pumps were adequate and the vacuum unit is appropriate. Ile questioned adding a condition regarding the 2 hour • period of night time hours and the vacuum unit, if the noise becomes a problem. Mr. Chuck Kilian, City Attorney, noted a condition could be added as long as it was clear on the intent and another hearing would have to be held. Cam. Fazekas stated this is an improvement from the last plan. Ile expressed concern regarding the noise and suggested a condition restricting the car wash operation to 8 PM if it was determined it was not meeting the noise standard. He felt the vacuum unit should be removed. Coin. Austin noted if 2 pumps were deleted the vacuum unit would be adequate. She expressed concern regarding the entrance and exit of garbage trucks and fuel tanks. She suggested the car wash be monitored when first opened regarding the noise level. Chr. Mackenzie noted the landscaping and signs will go to ASAC for final approval. Ile felt 6 pumps were adequate, but the vacuum unit PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting of March 11, 1991 Page 4 should be removed. Chr. Mackenzie suggested writing a condition stating if any complaints are filed a sound study must be done by the applicant to demonstrate they are working within the sound ordinance and to be reviewed by staff or Planning Commission. He expressed concern regarding the noise at night. Com. Mann suggested the site be monitored for noise during the 1st and 7th month or operation. Mr. Cowan stated a noise study can be done after 30 days of operation and if it is not adequate the hours of operation can be restricted to S PM. Mr. Kilian suggested a condition which is automatic for Chevron to come back with a noise study or because of complaints. • Chr. Mackenzie felt the 6 pumps were adequate, the vacuum unit should be removed, signs go to ASAC for approval and suggested a noise study after 60 days. 140TION: Com. Fazekas moved to recommend granting a Negative Declaration SECOND: Com. Mann VOTE: Passed 5-0 MOTION: Com. Fazekas moved to recommend approval of application 17-U-90 subject to the findings and subconclusions of the hearing with the following modifications: Cond. 12 to read "The developer shall install an eight (8) ft. high masonry wall on the northerly site boundary adjoining residential property. Said masonry wall materials and • appearance shall be subject to ASAC review prior to issuance of building permits; Cond. 15 to reflect one - pass through car wash only; Add Cond. 19 to read "Within sixty (60) days of commencing public operation of the car wash, the owner shall retain a professionally qualified acoustical consultant to evaluate the noise generating characteristics of the facility. Said report shall be presented to the Planning Commission in the context of a formal public hearing, duly noticed in accordance with City Ordinance 652. The Planning Commission shall examine the findings of said report to ascertain that the facility is operating in compliance with the night hours exposure standards for adjacent residential uses stated in the then current noise ordinance. If the Commission determines that said facility is not operating in compliance with said standards, the Commission may impose appropriate mitigation measures including but not limited to reducing evening hours of operation. SECOND: Com. Mahoney VOTE: Passed 5-0 CITY OF CUPS M NO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 252-4505 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning OonmLission FRCM: Planning Division Staff DATE: March 11, 1991 I. SUBJDCP 1. Application No.(s) 17-U-90 and 25-EA-90 Applicant Chevron Research/Technology Co. Property Owner Cupertino De Oro Club Location Northeast corner of Homestead Road and De Anza Blvd. USE PERMIT to demolish existing service station improvements and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 1,500 s.f. of building area encompassing a food market and car wash, with related • site improvements. (Cour=ED FROM MEETING OF 02/11/91) II. DISCUSSION At the February llth meeting the Cmmdssion gave consensus direction for final revision to the project plan set. This report describes the developers, response to those directions: A) ARCSIITDCIUR DIRDGTION 1) Establish theme in relation to the materials and textures approved for the Portofino (Marian) project across Homestead Road. 2) Replace a significant amount of the blue metal pump island canopy fascia with stucco treatment. 3) Add mass to the pump island campy columns; no explicit • material specification. Resoonse: On Sheet A-2, the developer has left a small metal frame around the signs on Elevations A and B, while the remaining mass of the fascia is stucco -surfaced. The steel columns have been wrapped in a built-up stucco section with painted reveals for additional texture (Compare former and proposed Elevation C). Staff Comment: The fascia solution presumes approval of wall mounted signs on each face of the pump island canopy. A proposed condition requires separate sign program approval by ASAC; however, approval of the proposed architectural solution may predispose ASAC to grant a larger number of wall signs than is currently appropriate under the Sign Code. (A site identified on a ground sign is usually allowed only one building mounted sign. However, this rule is applied as a guideline in a PD zone; the ASAC could allow more wall signs if a compelling case for their need is presented.) APPLICATION 17-U-90 03/11/91 Page - 2 - Staff has proposed a condition which requires a solid stucco fascia on all sides of pump island canopy, with the provison that a small portion of the stucco may be deleted in favor of wood or painted metal as a backdrop for a sign, if a sign is approved for any elevation of the pump island canopy. We have also enclosed a sample elevation drawing for the Marian project for comparative purposes. B) LANDSCAPING DIRECTION 1) Replace all existing trees to be removed on a one for one basis; use replacement trees to create an overstory buffer between the service station property and the adjoining apartment building. 2) Add street trees to the Homestead Road frontage planter area and the adjoining sidewalk. • 3) A portion of new trees should be of specimen scale, up to 36" box equivalent at time of installation. Response: Approximately 12 existing trees (4 conifers e E. Prop. line and 8 broadleafs in the easterly grove will be replaced by 14 new box -size specimen Oak, Redwood or flowering ornamental trees. This inventory of new trees includes the Homestead frontage and the area between the car wash and apartment complex. Staff Oonvnent: While the proposed condition requires ASAC to review the landscape plan in detail following use permit approval, staff has suggested that an evergreen broadleaf tree be selected on the north boundary in place of the deciduous Flowering Pear to ensure year around visual buffering between the commercial and residential uses. The condition also requires ASAC to examine the proposed planting of irrigated understory vegetation beneath the proposed Coast Live Oaks; this practice has been discouraged in is past testimony before the commission by respected arborculture authorities. C) NOISE EVALUATION 1) Sound consultant requested to evaluate steps needed to obtain maximum exterior noise level of 58 db measured at the residential property line for full operation of the car wash equipment. Response: The sound consultant will respond verbally to this matter at the public hearing. r • APPLICATION 17-U-90 03/11/91 Page - 3 - Staff Cmmnent: At the last meeting, there was no consensus as to whether the vacuum cleaner unit in the easterly parking area should be retained or eliminated. staff has proposed a condition requiring its deletion do to potential noise effects, but also due to the small supply of available parking for food store customers. It was not anticipated that drying, detailing or vacuuming space would be offered as part of the car wash function. The developer has expressed concern about the provisions of Condition 15 regarding the wash cycle timing. It is their intent to set the machinery for a one -pass wash/rinse cycle per vehicle but to allow the time of each pass to vary according to the length of the vehicle being served. We believe that this explanation makes sense and have provided revised wording which allows the single pass mode of operation without respect to length of cycle. Environmental Assessment: The mnvironmental Review committee recommends granting of a Negative Declaration finding no significant impacts associated with the proposed development. Application 17-U-90: If the Cmmdzsion is reasonably satisfied with the sound consultant's verbal report on 03/11/91, the enclosed model resolution contains findings and approval supporting a favorable decision. Enclosures: - Model Resolution - Letter fran De Oro Club dated 02/27/91 - Marian Project Comparative elevation - Application Plan Set VSAIJ D• • • �•i' V• 4k(4Ak—� Robert Cowan ^'^— Director of Community Development \reports\17UFINAL 17-U-90 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION No. OF THE PLANNING CODMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPEFd*>M REOCiII4FMING APPROVAL OF A USE PE1041T TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING SERVICE STATION AND TO REOONSTRUCT A NEW SELF-SERVICE FUEL STATION WITH 1,500 SQ. FT. OF BUIIDING AREA ENCOMPASSING A FOOD M MW AND A CAR WASH, WITH RELATED SITE IIAVFMENTS SECTION I WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described on Page 2 of this Resolution; and . WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application.; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the application meets the following requirements: a) That the use or uses are in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Cupertino, and are not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. b) That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to accommy)date the proposed use. c) That the proposed use will not generate a level of traffic over and above that of the capacity of the existing street system. • d) That the proposed use is otherwise not detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed uses, nor injurious to property and inprovements in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit is hereby recawended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application 17-U-90 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of March 11, 1991, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Resolution No. 03/11/91 Page -2- Application No(s) 17-U-90 and 25-EA-9 Applicant: Chevron Research and Technoloav Property Owner: Cupertino De Oro Club Location: Northeast Corner of De Anza Blvd. and Homestead Road Parcel Area: 75 Acres D J a QA2,*A4_L4M I 04 V.1 J;!p§%L8J* Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City. 4. GRAD Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in a000rdance with Ordinance 1143. 0 5. DRATNAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. UMERMOUM UrILXIrJ[ The developer shall couply with the requirements of the underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall suhnit detailed plans shading utility underground provisions. said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. Resolution No. 03/11/91 Page -3- � r •,• a is • r: aa�ia.� The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for undergrowx1ing of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. r: •. i : Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF • AOCMIMCE OF ENGn4EMI14G/SURVEYING OONDITIONS (Section 66474.10 CA Gov't. Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section III of this Resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices. Travice Whitten, Asst. City Erg. o • •• • • • u a• a• 1 •r • a • • o moviv I os The reccamwndation of approval is based on Sheet Al (11/21/90), A-2 (09/26/90 and Irl (11/21/90) except as may be amended by the Conditions • contained in this Resolution. Exhibit A-2 shall be modified to reflect a continuous stucco fascia treatment for the pump island canopy. A small portion of said stucco treatment may be deleted for a wood or painted metal bacvkdrep for a sign if said sign is approved as part of a formal sign program through the Architectural and Site Approval Oonmtittee. 10. MODIFICATION OF APPROVED DEVEMPMENr PIAN In the event that the applicant or subsequent property owner shall desire to make any minor charges, alterations or amendment of the approved development plan, a written request or revised development plan shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Development. If the Director makes a finding that the changes are minor and do not result in a material affect upon the appearance or function of the project, said changes may be certified on the revised plan. If approval of said changes is withheld, the applicant may appeal to the Planning Commission. Resolution No. 03/11/91 Page -4- If the Director finds that the requested changes are material, such changes shall be referred to the Planning Commission for approval. If the changes are denied by the Planning camnission, the applicant may appeal to the City Council as provided in City Ordinance No. 652. If said changes are approved by the Planning Commission, an appeal may be made to the City Council by any interested party. Further, any Member of the City Council may request a hearing before the City Council regarding said approved changes. Said request shall be made within ten (10) days from the date of approval of said changes by the Planning Commission. 11. APPROVED USE The subject use permit authorizes the construction and operation of a • single -stall car wash, food market, and fueling stations as depicted on the exhibits listed in condition 9 above. Bquipment installed in the car wash structure shall replicate the sound generation characteristics described in the Fitzroy/Dobbs study of January 24, 1991 as contained in City file 17-U-90. 12. AM.SONRY BARRIER The developer shall install an eight (8) ft. high masonry wall on the northerly site boundary adjoining residential property. Said masonry wall materials and appearance shall be subject to ASAC review prior to issuance of building permits. 13. HOURS OF OPERATION The car wash facility shall operate only between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM daily. Operation of the food mart and fuel pumps shall • be restricted to the hours of 6:00 AM to 11:00 PM daily per previous use permit 55-U-87. 14. ON -SITE PARF�IG All automobiles parked on site shall be placed in striped off-street parking as shown in the final development plan approved by ASAC. 15. CONSERVATION MEASURES Operation of the car wash facility shall be limited to the a single pass wash -rinse cycle. said facility shall also be fitted with water recycling equipment. The intent of this condition is to reduce water usage demand associated with car wash activity. 16. TRANSIT PCTLL-OUP A transit pull-out shall be located along De Anza Blvd. subject to approval by the City's traffic engineer. The property owner shall record an appropriate easement document allowing for placement of transit turn -out improvements and public sidewalks over private property. Said easement document shall be subject to approval of the City Attorney prior to recordation. 0 ►_J Resolution No. 03/11/91 Page -5- ASAC shall approve the final landscaping plan and tree preservation/replacement plan. The tree preservation plan should be certified by a qualified arborist and should be specific to the site. Replacement of specimen trees removed should be made on a one -far -one basis with min. 36" box size California Native varieties. The final landscape plan shall eonply with the City's Xeriscape Guidelines program, and shall reflect the following modifications: a) Replace the deciduous Flowering Pear on the north boundary with an evergreen broadleaf tree to ensure year around visual buffering between the commercial and residential uses. b) Delete planting of irrigated understory vegetation beneath the proposed Coast Live Oaks 18. SIGN PRAGR11N1 Signing indicated on the exhibits referenced in condition 9 above is not approved, and shall require separate ASAC approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED this filth day of March, 1991 at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Camnission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: OOMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: CCMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Robert Cowan Director of Cximwnity Development \perescs\17u90 Don Mackenzie, Chairman Cupertino Planning Commission CITY OF CUPETWINO 10300 TOME AVENUE, CUPOCINO, CA 95014 (408) 252-4505 TO: Mike Manos, Chevron R & T FROM: Mark Caughey, City Planner SUB,JEMApplication 17-U-90 DATE: February 19, 1991 This memo is interned to confirm the Planning Cancnission's direction to you regarding resukmittal of the landscape, architectural and noise control aspects of the application: 1) Replace all existing trees to be removed on a one -far -one basis; use these replacement trees to create an appropriately sized overstory buffer between the service station property and the adjoining apartment building. 2) Add street trees to the Homestead Road frontage planter area and within the adjoining public sidewalk. In both cases, trees of specimen scale should be included, up to a 36" box size equivalent at time of installation. NOISE o0tanar. 1) Mr. Dobbs should describe those steps necessary to attain a maximum exterior noise level of 58dB as measured at the property line for full operation of the car crash equipment • ARDHITSCiUBE 1) Architectural theme should be established in relation to the nearby Mariani residential project in terms of materials and textures. 2) The fascia areas on the pump island canopies should be treated in stucco, and the amount of blue color appearing thereon should be greatly reduced. 3) Pump island canopy columns should be enhanced to appear more substantial with greater mass. The Ccamnission did not explicitly direct the use of particular material for that purpose. PLANNING -COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting of February 11, 1991 j Page 2 CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. PARCEL MAP 2-TM-89 - Doug Chang: Request for a one year extension of a Tentative Map for a two lot single family subdivision located -on Rae Lane West of Hyannisport Drive. MOTION: Com. Fazekas moved to approve the consent calendar SECOND: Com. Malin VOTE: Passed 5-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS: 2. Application No(s): 17-U-90 and 25-EA-90 Applicant Cheveron Research/Technology Co. Property Owner: Cupertino De Oro Club Location: Northeast corner of Homestead Rd. and De • Anza Blvd. USE PERMIT to demolish an existing service station and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 1,500 s.f. of building area encompassing a food market and car wash, with related site improvements. 5-t-pff Presentation: Mr. Caughey gave an overview of the past December hearing and reiterated the Commissioners concerns at that time. Ile noted the major changes have to do with the configuration and design elements. The site plan has been revised and the car wash has been moved to the north to preserve the landscaping on the east. Mr. Caughey explained the changes in the architecture noting the flat metal roofs have been changed to a pitched red tile format in a gable fashion to establish a context with the surrounding • neighborhood. Staff felt wood facia details, wood wrapped columns and corbel could also enhance this' building and would like the applicant to look into this. Iie noted there has been a reduction in width of the driveways. The developer has requested to selectively retain one or two specimen trees and plant younger trees more adaptable to the climate. The project noise study suggested that either a 12 ft. sound wall along perimeter or a wing wall on either side of the car wash and hours of operation should be lam to l0pm to mitigate possible noise problems. Mr. Caughey noted the applicant has added additional landscaping on the Homestead frontage as well as on the north side. Staff suggested 24 hour use be prohibited. Com. Austin expressed concern regarding planting more tress and suggested saving what was there. Mr. Caughey noted the pavement would come up to the trunk line and a loft. space is needed to preserve the trees. Com. Austin expressed concern regarding hours of operation and the trips generated with this project. In response, Mr. Caughey stated PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting of February 11, 1991 Page 3 an extraordinary use policy was passed two years ago and the Commission can determine if the 19 trips are acceptable. Applicant presentation: Mr. Mike Mannis noted the concerns of the Commissioners. lie noted the car wash has been moved and wing walls will be placed adjacent to it. The trash enclosure has been relocated, which has created an additional parking space. Ile noted the bus turnout is adequate as the driveways have been narrowed. Ile noted the revised plan contains over 30 percent of landscaping with the retention of two pepper trees. lie noted they will adhere to the arborist report regarding the removal of trees. Mr. Mannis explained the architecture noting the Spanish style roof and stucco texture. He is in agreement with staff regarding the hours of operation, but would still prefer 24 hour operation. He feels the project is good and is compatible with the surrounding • neighborhood. In response to Com. Fazekas' question Mr. Mannis stated concrete tile would be used and the sound wall will be approximately 8 ft. high. Com. Fazekas expressed concern regarding noise from cars waiting for the car wash. Mr. Mannis felt this noise would not be significant. Mr. Bill Dobbs, Acoustical Consultant, noted several noise studies have been done at this site. The hours 7 am - 10 pm are standard for the City. By moving the car wash to the north there is a noise reduction. He noted under the umbrella of noise from the streets the cars waiting for the car wash will not be significant. lie noted the sound wall will be beneficial to the apartments. In response to Com. Mann's question regarding sound proofing of the so car wash, Mr. Dobbs did not believe,this to be necessary. The public hearing was opened. Com. Austin questioned the parking. Mr. Caughey noted there are six parking spaces which he pointed out on the site plan. He noted the vacuum pack located next to one of the parking spaces will have to be addressed. Mr. Mannis stated they would like to keep the vacuum pack, which could be sound proof. Chr. Mackenzie suggested changing'the facia on the canopies over the pump irons which may make it more compatible with the De Oro Club. Mr. Caughey noted whatever architectural theme is chosen for the pump irons should be replicated on the car wash and snack shop. Mr. Mannis noted they had followed the architecture of the Portifino project. He felt wood trim would not enhance this project. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting of February 11, 1991 Page 4 Com. Mann suggested a combination on the steel posts and splash guard at the bottom. Mr. Mannis felt this is not feasible. Ms. Doris Hijmans, De Oro Club, noted they are not interested in having the gas station look like the De Oro Club and noted they are in agreement with Chevron regarding the removal of any trees. Chr. Mackenzie closed the public hearing. Com. Mann did not support the architecture and would like to see fewer pumps an the site. She also noted concern regarding the two driveways and the bus turnout noting there could be traffic problems. Two rather than three driveways is preferred. Com. Mahoney noted this project looks good, but needs a little more • work. Ile expressed concern regarding parking. Com. Fazekas supported the basic concept of the site layout. He noted two driveways on Saratoga -Sunnyvale road are acceptable. He would like to see more trees on Homestead and Saratoga -Sunnyvale and dense tree planing on the north property line. Ile noted the stucco and clay tile enhanced the appearance noting the facia should be stucco, he concurred with Com. Mann regarding splash guard on the columns. Com. Fazekas noted the sound wall should be 10 ft. - 12 ft. Com. Austin stated there is too much activity on the property and not enough parking. She suggested the removal of the food mart. She felt 7 am is too early and suggested Sam or gam and felt the architecture is acceptable. • Chr. Mackenzie would like to see more stucco along the facia and concurred with Com. Austin with regards to too much activity. Ile felt the columns are acceptable as presented as were the hours of operation. Com. Fazekas stated he did not see parking as a problem; people purchase food while refueling. The Commissioners decided to review the architecture at a later hearing with suggestions to carry.the stucco theme throughout the site and scale up the columns. Chr. Mackenzie requested that more sound studies be done. Also add a condition giving direction to ASAC regarding the trees. MOTION: Com. Fazekas moved to continue this application to the meeting of March 11, 1991 SECOND: Com. Mann VOTE: Passed 5-0 CITY OF CLIPEtYrM 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 252-4505 10. chairman and Merrhers of the Planning Commission FROM: Planning Division Staff DATE: February 11, 1991 I. Suiuncr I. Application No.(s) 17-U-90 and 25-EA-90 Applicant Chevron Research/Technology Co. Property Owner Cupertino De Oro Club Location Northeast cornea' of Homestead Road and De Anza Blvd. USE PERW to demolish existing service station improvements and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 1,500 s.f. of • building area encampassinJ a food market and car wash, with related site improvements. II. DISCUSSION the subject application was continued from the meeting of October 29, 1990 with direction to the developer to address the following issues: A) Architecture: The flat metal roofs have been changed to a pitched red tile format, in response to your direction to establish a context with the surrounding neighborhood. In staff s opinion, this change is not substantial enough to connect visually with the Marian project, nor with the historic be Oro Club building. Our suggestion to the developer that the roof line and material charge is a good start hit should be supplemented with food fascia • details (instead of metal), wood wrapped columns and corbels, etc. was rejected. B) Site Layout/Access: Several ccmdssioners expressed concern about having two driveway aprons on the west frontage, but there was no consensus to delete one of them. The developer has offered a slight reduction in the width of each driveway, as one Member suggested, and has slightly increased the length of the intervening planter. C) Existing Trees: As you can see, the car wash building has been , moved from the east to the north edge of the site. By so doing, they have retained more of the easterly site area for landscaping and trees. However, they have proposed that most of the existing trees be removed, with the exception of the southerly 31" Pepper (in good condition), and 6211 Eucalyptus (in poor condition). one commissioner has already suggested that the Eucalyptus be removed. Retention of a small Pepper on the north side is proposed, but is probably infeasible due to grade charge and foundation trenching within its dripline. Application 17-U-90 02/11/91 Page -1- Staff concurs with the tree removal proposal and relocation of the car wash, even though several smaller but healthy Blue Cum trees near the car wash building driveway, and a good 15" Pepper would also be lost. A rigorous program of replacement trees should be required, thus resulting in a more attractive and longer -lived tree grove adjacent to the De Oro Club building than would result from attempting to save the existing trees which have been stressed by age, drought and frost. D) Noise: Relocation of the car wash closer to the apartment building in Sunnyvale suggested intuitively that residents would suffer greater disturbance from vehicle and equipment noise. The attached letter of 01/24/91 from the sound consultant suggested that either a 12' high sound wall on the perimeter would be needed, or a wing wall on either side of the car wash building corridor. standard conditions already require installation of a masonry sound wall on a vial site adjoining residential . uses; the wing walls suggested by the noise consultant should also be required. We also reiterate our earlier suggestion that the car wash not operate after 10:00 pm nor before 7:00 am when traffic noise is insufficient to mask the sound impacts. E) Iandscaping: Several Commissioners felt that the plan seen in October had insufficient landscaped areas, particularly near the street frontages. The revised plan has slightly increased planter width adjacent to the streets, with substantial increases adjacent to the residential property line and at the east edge of the site as previously noted. Additional landscaping can be added to the Homestead frontage by eliminating the driving lane between the edge of the canopy and the proposed planter strip limit; as previously proposed by one Counissioner, closure of one driveway on the De Anza frontage as a • result of eliminating the car wash would also increase landscaping space. F) ilors of Opezatim: One Commissioner stated previuusly that 24 hour operation of the facility, with or without the car wash, is unacceptable adjacent to a residential occupancy. staff concurs with this position, and so stated in the October, 190 report. IIEDCF14ENDATICH Environmental Assessment: The Environmental Review Committee reconvands the granting of a Negative Declaration finding no significant impacts associated with the proposed development. Application 17-U-90 02/11/91 Page -2- pgplication 17-0-90• 4he project has not been amended significantly to establish an appropriate sense of context; therefore, the application is not yet fit for a decision. We have provided some direction for fit, which the Co m fission may affirm or modify. If the oamdssion is prepared to act favorably at this time, a model resolution is enclosed for that purpose. Enclosures: - Model Resolution - Staff report of 10/29/90 - Traffic Study - Noise Analysis, 01/24/91 - Arborist Report, 3/20/90 - Application Plan Set revised 11/21/90 • APPRCKM BY: &L81n.� Robert Cmian Director of Oom =uty Development \reports\17-u-90 • CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUPION No. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPEIMM REOCNII4EE1DING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT 70 DEMOLISH AN EXISTING SERVICE STATION AND TO REOONSTOXT A NEW SELF-SERVICE FUEL STATION WITH 1,500 SQ. FT. OF BUILDING AREA EN0OMPASSING A FOOD MARKET AND A CAR WASH, WITH RELATED SITE I11PR0VD2NPS SEOTION I• FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described on Page 2 of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application.; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the application meets the following requirements: a) That the use or uses are in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Cupertino, and are not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. b) That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use. c) That the proposed use will not generate a level of traffic over and above that of the capacity of the existing street system. d) That the proposed use is otherwise not detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals and general welfare of persons residing or • working in the neighborhood of such proposed uses, nor injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application 17-U-90 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of February 11, 1991, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Resolution No. 02/11/91 Page -3- The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for u dergrownding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. • ;y1a• Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. CM ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS (Section 66474.10 CA Gov't. Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section III of this Resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices. Travice Whitten, Asst. City Erg. The recommendation of approval is based on Sheet Al (3/15/90), and on Sheet SN 1 (2/14/89), except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 10. MODIFICATION OF APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN In the event that the applicant or subsequent property owner shall desire to make any minor changes, alterations or amendment of the approved development plan, a written request or revised development plan shall be sulinitted to the Director of Planning and Development. If the Director makes a finding that the changes are minor and do not result in a material affect upon the appearance or function of the project, said changes may be certified on the revised plan. If approval of said changes is withheld, the applicant may appeal to the Planning Commission. If the Director finds that the requested changes are material, such changes shall be referred to the Planning Commission for approval. If the changes are denied by the Planning Commission, the applicant may appeal to the City Council as provided in City Ordinance No. 652. If said changes are approved by the Planning Commission, an appeal may be made to the City Council by any interested party. Further, any Mmber of the City Council may request a hearing before the City Resolution No. 02/11/91 Page -4- Council regarding said approved changes. Said request stall be made within ten (10) days from the date of approval of said changes by the Planning Commission. The subject use permit authorizes the construction and operation of a single -stall car wash, food market, and fueling stations as depicted on the exhibits listed in condition 9 above. Equipment installed in the car wash structure shall replicate the sound generation characteristics described in the Fitzroy/Dobbs study of January 24, 1991 as contained in City file 17-U-90. 12. K%SONRY MRRIF32 The developer shall install an eight (8) ft. high masonry wall on the northerly site bauxiairy adjoining residential property. Said masonry wall materials and appearance shall be subject to ASAC review prior to 40 issuance of building permits. 13. HOURS OF OPERATION The car wash facility shall operate only between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:o0 PM daily. Operation of the food mart and fuel pumps shall be restricted to the hours of 6:00 AM to 11:00 PM daily per previous use permit 55-U-87. All automobiles parked on site shall be placed in striped off-street parking as shown in the final development plan approved by ASAC. 15. CONSEMTION MEASURES • Operation of the car wash facility shall be limited to the one -minute wash -dry cycle option only. Said facility shall also be fitted with water recycling equipment. The intent of this condition is to reduce water usage demand associated with car wash activity. 16. TRANSIT H7LTi OUP A transit pull -cut shall be located along De Anza Blvd. subject to approval by the City0s traffic engineer: The property owner shall record an appropriate easement document allowing for placement of transit turn -out improvements and public sidewalks over private property. Said easement document shall be subject to approval of the City Attorney prior to recordation. • Resolution No. 02/11/91 Page -5- ASAC shall approve the final landscaping plan and tree preservation plan. she tree preservation plan should be certified by a qualified arborist and should be specific to the site. Replacement of specimen trees removed should be made on a one -for -one basis with min. 36" box size California Native varieties. Signing indicated on the exhibits referenced in condition 9 above is not approved, and shall require separate ASAC approval. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of February, 1991 at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: OCMSSIONE RS: NOES: CCl"T7ISSIONERS: ABSPAIN: COMMISSICNERS: ABSEM: OCMSSIONERS: Robert Cowan Director of Oammuiity Development 0 \peresos\17u90 Don Mackenzie, Chairman Cupertino Pimmimxg Commission 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 252-4505 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Comdssion FROM: Planning Division staff DATE: November 26, 1990 I. 1. Application No.(s) 17-U-90 and 25-FA-90 Applicant Chevron Research/Technoloc� Co. Property Owner Cupertino De Oro Club Location Northeast corner of Homestead Road and De Anza Blvd. USE PERKrr to demolish existing service station improvements and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 1,500 s.f. of building area encompassing a food market and car wash, with related site improvements. (CCtUMWED FRM MEMMr. OF 10/29/90) II. DISCUSSION This item was continued at the applicant's request from the October 29th meeting to allow time for them to refine the architectural concept, improve driveway access, add perimeter landscaping and respond to security conoerns. Chevron officials have indicated their need for more time to prepare drawings and noise studies which respond to the Commission's concerns, and will return at the first meeting of the new year. APPROVED FOR SUBMITTAL: Olt(t, , Robert Cowan Director of Community Development \reports\17-u-90 PLANKING COMMISSION MINUTES Regul Meeting of October 29, 1990 Paqe a Ms. Nancy Bu nett, Chair, Study Committee; noted th League has a goal to provi low income housing. Ms. Burnett o lined the ways to obtain thiSunder l SII line on slides esented to the Commission. Sed ow income housi g is inadequate in Cupertino and edhe low income eople and urged the Commission to lthies of the people. She noted the newcomers to Ca'force nnot afford to live in Cupertino. Ms.t ver th General Plan regarding the developers invntow ' come housing. She noted transportation robs gested the City convey a survey to find out whty s live and where City residents work. She notre o specifics yet as to this problem which will come Stof the General Plan. Zskn asked if the eague had ny suggestions on how to solve BY problem. Burnett sta ed it is important to protect hoods. a noted educatio of the public as to the , needs t be implemented. eka stated that San Jose's low i come projects are small e s.Com. Mackenzie moved to continue th public hearing to November 13, 1990 Com. AdamsPassed 5-0 5. Application No.(s): 17-U-90 and 25-EA-90 Applicant: Chevron Research/Technology Co. Property Owner: Northeast corner of Homestead Road and De Anza Blvd. USE PERMIT to demolish existing service station improvements fe and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 1,500 s.f. of building area encompassing a food market and car wash, with related site improvements. Staff Presentation: Mr. Mark Caughey presented the staff report. He noted staff has several concerns regarding this project. He noted a traffic study was completed concluding the site generates 25 trips per acre. In comparison with other service stations he felt this is a reasonable approximation of the trip generation standard. Staff is concerned regarding noise control of the car wash, but stated a noise study found the ambient sound level of traffic will exceed the car wash. Staff suggested not permitting a 24 hour service, but operate as the current Use Permit provides. Regarding the design issues, ASAC suggested redistribution of parking and garbage to a more centralized location. He noted concerns regarding the architecture of the project in relationship to surrounding buildings and suggested ASAC look at this. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting of October 29, 1990 Page 9 Mr. Caughey explained the Arborist's report noting the two largest trees are in bad condition and the 13" pepper tree will be lost. He noted the pavement may encroach on to the 31" pepper tree and noted other solutions will be researched to preserve the tree. He noted staff is recommending approval with conditions that would require additional review by ASAC of details and also require a transit turnout with appropriate grants of easements and the operating hours be limited to 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. Com. Mackenzie expressed concern regarding the relocation of parking and garbage as the site was full. Mr. Caughey stated there is enough room to do this. Applicant Presentation; Mr. Dale Wahlen, Chevron, noted the layout of the service station has allowed for the widening of Homestead and for a bus turnout. He noted the building could not be moved • forward, as the sidewalk had been moved back to allow for the bus turnout. He noted ASAC suggested putting in landscaping where the two parking spaces were originally and they are agreeable to ASAC suggestions. In response to Com. Fazekas' question Mr. Wahlen noted there is no landscaping on Saratoga -Sunnyvale Road because it had been removed to allow for the bus turnout. He noted smaller landscaping may be put in. He noted it was agreed with the owner of the apartments near the service station that a sound wall will be installed. Mr. Wahlen stated he is in support of the car wash operation to 11 p.m. but would like to be able to serve gas 24 hours. Mr. Bill Scudder suggested, if permitted to operate 24 hours they could shut down a pump closest to the apartments to cut down on noise. Com. Fazekas felt one driveway was too close to the corner. Mr. Whitten stated that the City has the right to close a driveway if it becomes a hazard. Mr. Wahlen stated that the two driveways are necessary as one driveway creates a street traffic problem. Com. Fazekas suggested 36 ft. driveways. Com. Adams felt the building's architect should blend with the surrounding buildings. The public hearing was then opened. Ms. Doris Hijmans, Cupertino De Oro Club, noted she did not have any objection to the removal of the eucalyptus trees and replanting of trees native to the area. Mr. John Delmare, Mariani Development, questioned the noise study and possible impacts of the car wash on the Mariani Development. He noted he was more concerned regarding night time hours. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Regular Meeting of October 29, 1990 Page 10 Chr. Claudy stated the study indicated that it is only late night and early morning that the noise exceeds the existing ambient level. He noted the hours of operation of the car wash will be limited. In response to Cam. Adams' question Mr. Caughey stated there was a ground contamination study done on this site. Cam. Mackenzie stated there is too much on the site and would like to see landscaping on Saratoga-SunnyvalQ Road. He felt the driveways should be narrower and would like to see where the parking spaces will be. He would not support 24 hour service as it is next to residential, but if 24 hour service was granted the cash register should be visible from the street for security reasons. Cam. Mann concurred with Cam. Mackenzie and felt there was too much on the site. Cam. Fazekas concurred with Cam. Mackenzie and did not see the need for a drive-thru car wash and have to sacrifice landscaping on Saratoga -Sunnyvale Road. He would support two driveways, but would like to see one eucalyptus tree left. Coin. Adams stated he would like to see this development compatible with the other corners, he felt is was too much like a box structure and would not support it as is. Chr. Claudy stated he would not support this development and concurred with Cam. Adams. He noted there was a lack of landscaping. MOTION: Cam. Mackenzie moved to continue 17-U-90 and 25-EA-90 to November 27, 1990 SECOND: Cam. Mann VOTE: Passed 5-0 NEW BUSINESS: 6. LICATION 10-U-90 (Revised): MARIANI DEVELOPM CORP. - Requ ing approval of revisions to the approv rchitectural exhibits r the townhouse portion of a nned residential community at a southeast corner o omestead Road and De Anza Blvd. Staff Presentation: Mr. Bob C presented the staff report. He showed drawings of the ap ed bui ngs and one of the proposed, both front and rear v' S. He noted request is for a minor amendment to chan a architecture and fo nd explained this as outlined in t staff report. He felt the fi t proposal was a richer or ntation. CITY OF C1PERrBdD 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 252-4505 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FFM: William Hopkins, Planning Intern DATE: October 29, 1990 I, s DUUM rr 1 -_F} Y. USE PEH4Tr to demolish existing service station and to reconstruct a ' new self-service fuel station with 5,700 s.f. of building area enoompassing a food market and car wash, with related site improvements - Building Configuration: Existing: 2,464 s.f. Proposed: 1,500 s.f. Total, including 560 s.f. food mart Building Coverage: 7% existing, 17% proposed Freight: 111 existing, 111611 proposed Parking: Required: 7 spaces (1 sp/200 s.f.) (28.5 spaces) Proposed: 5 spaces (4 regular, 1 handicapped.) 0 Applicable Policy Plan: EKtracrdinary Use Policy Use Permit application for 24-hour service station operation was denied by the City Council in 1987 because of proximity to residential area. Use Permit approval was granted in 1988 allowing service station operations and incidental sales of convenience items between the hours of 6 AM to 11 PM. A) Zoning: The parcel is zoned P (OG))Planned General Commercial and the proposed project is consistent with the commercial intent of that designation. Application 17-U-90 10/29/90 Page -2- (GFNF ML PLAN CCNSISM4CY - continued) 8) Cfaezal Plan: Service stations are defined as extraordinary uses under Resolution 2996 since there is no reasonable relationship between building area and traffic generation. The policy sets a standard of 16 trips/acre during the peak hour (5 PM - 6 M to determine allowable traffic intensity. The applicant's parcel is .75 acres and would therefore be allowed 1J trips/peak hour under the policy. The attached trip( generation study conducted in June, 1988 tes the following characteristics for the site: Total existing service station trips: 38 (one -Way, 50% peak direction) Trips generated by proposed project: Fuel Pumps: 51 Food Mart: 15 car Wash: 10 TOTAL 76 Policy 4 of Resolution 2996 allows for the disoc uiting of "passerby" trips, i.e. trips that are not newly generated as a result of the use activity. The traffic generation study concludes that, in Cupertino, 75% of the trips to service stations with food marts and cai washes can be considered passerby trips. Using this discaLmt factor,'of 75%, the study reached the following trip generation characteristics Par the project: One -Way peak direction 38 / disaxmt factor (38 X .75) 28 Trips exclusive to site 10 Trips generated/acre 13 Proposed: Or -Way peak direction 76 discocuut factor (76 X .75) 57 Trips exclusive to site: 1914 Trips generated/acre 25 The 25 trips/acre generated by the proposed project is 9 trips/acre greater than the 16 trips/acre standard expressed in Resolution 2996. However, Service stations have traditionally been allowed to exceed this standard. The Shell station with car wash and food mart at the oerner of Stevens Creek and Stalling was approved in December 1988 with a traffic generation rate of 28 trips/acre. Also, the traffic generation study examined the level of service (IM) condition at the intersection of Application 17-U-90 10/29/90 Page -3- (GRMZAL RM C0NSISrM4CX - continued) Harestead and De Anza and determined that the proposed additional trips would not change the existing IDS of D- at the intersection. Although staff does not consider the excess trips to be a problem, trip intensity could be reduced by limiting the number of fuel pumps or by removing the food mart and/or car wash. A) Noise Control: The attached noise study analyzes the effects of the proposed car wash on the villa Camino apartments which are located just to the north of the project. The study concludes that the car wash will imperceptibly raise the average 24-hour noise level at the apartments. Most of the existing noise at the apartments is generated by traffic traveling on Homestead and De Anza, primarily during the daytime and early evening hours. This existing background noise will mask the operation of • the car wash during those hours; however, as traffic drops off during the night, the noise impacts of the car wash on the apartments will become more pronounced. To mitigate this problem, a condition is proposed that would limit the car wash operation the hoes of 7:00 AM to 10:00 FM daily. B) Trees: There are thirteen trees on the site, eight of which are considered specimen trees under the City's Tree Ordinance. The development plan calls for the removal of two of these specimen trees and for the planting of six new trees to replace those lost. The attached arborist report examines the health of the individual trees. it concludes that extensive decay is present in the two largest eucalyptus trees creating a significant hazard, and recommends removal (the removal of one of these trees is called for in the development plan). ASAC had no problem with the removal of the trees as long as they are replaced with minimum thirty-six inch boot native California trees. The report also concludes that the paving and grading proposed by the project will have long-term negative impacts on the remaining trees and recommends the implementation of an extensive tree preservation program. Staff has dai)ts about whether the tree preservation program can be implemented within the parameters of the proposed development plan because the driplines of the subject trees extend into areas slated for extensive paving and grading. It is suggested that the arborist certify that the final site plan conforms to his recommendations, and that a precise landscaping/tree preservation plan specific to the project site be brought back to ASAC for final approval. C) Parking and Circulation: The proposed development plan provides a total of five parking spaces while the City's Parking ordinance requires approximately seven parking spaces for the site. (five for the 960 s.f. food mart (1 space/200 S.f.) plus one space for each employee). The other proposed uses, fueling and car wash, do not generate parking requirements on their own, and therefore parking should not be required for those uses. The car wash provides queuing space for apprcxihnately four vehicles. Given that a substantial amount of the food mart business will be generated by those purchasing fuel, the proposed number of parking spaces should be adequate. Application 17-U-90 10/29/90 Page -4- D) Site Development: ASAC reviewed the circulation and larxiscapirq Plans for the site and expressed some concerns with the location of the trash enclosure and the two parking spaces currently proposed along the northern edge of the parcel. The eemmittes suggested moving those two items as to not iRact the residential use to the north and also suggested providing a planter strip along that border. General Plan Policy 2--6 requires that noise from commercial uses not intrude into residential areas. %his is usually accomplished by locating intrusive uses away frcm residential borders and by the planting of a landscape buffer. Staff is also concerned about the location of the parking stalls and the trash enclosure against the north property line. A condition is suggested that would relocate these uses away from the north property line, preferably to the center of the site next to the car wash building. Additionally, a condition is suggested that would require the planting of a fifteen foot landscaped buffer along the north property • line. It is suggested that the final site development plan be referred to ASAC for final approval. E) Mransit Pull -Oat: General Plan Policy 2-18 allows for the requirement of bus stop turnouts within the street frontage of new or redeveloping sites. The staff is reccmwzxirg a transit pull-out to be located along Sunnyvale -Saratoga Road. The subject area will not require any further dedication but will require an easement. The Traffic Engineer has reviewed the proposal and has suggested decreasing the size of the driveways on Sunnyvale -Saratoga Road to thirty-two feet. A condition is suggested to reflect this change. F) ClMservatim: Consistent with Policy 5-18 of the Environmental Resources Element of the General Plan, a condition is proposed that requires the car wash system be fitted with water recycling equipment, and limits operation of the facility to the single wash -dry phase option in order to reduce water usage. • G) Huildirg Architecture: The project site is located at a highly visible and well traveled intersection, and staff is concerned that the architectural style proposed for the project is of a generic nature. The applicant should consider the adjacent Cupertino De Oro Club building and Portofino development in their design. It is suggested that in conjunction with its review of the site development plan, ASAC also review the architectural style of the project, and require charges to the materials palette to set the service station in a more appropriate context with its surroundings. dings. H) Hours of Use: The applicant is requesting permission to operate the service station and food mart on a twenty-four hour basis. The same request was made in a use pernnit application in 1987 and the application was denied by the City Council because of concerns about the proximity to a residential use. Staff can find no substantial changes to the findings that were made at that time and is therefore unable to recrunend approval of a twenty-four hour operation. The existing use permit allows operation from 6:00 AM to 11:00 PM and staff recmmends no change in this condition. Application 17-U-90 Page -5- 10/29/90 Erndxwmental Assesmient: The Envirormental Review Ommittee reocwmends the granting or a Negative Declaration finding no significant imact associated with the proposed dievelciment. AWlication 17-U-90e Approval aco=ding to the findings and conditions specified in the attached rodel. resolution. Enclostums: - Model Resolution - Traffic Study, 6/90 and 10/90 - Noise Analysis, 7/2.2/90 arid 10/10/90 - Arborist Report, 3/20/90 - letter from Do Oro Club to ASAC, 9/4/90 - Application Plan Set • - Initial Study APPIUM BY: Fbtimt Cp4an DirectoOr Of CCCULMity Development \reports\17-u-90 0 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION No. OF THE PLANNING OO MSSI0N OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ROOCUERIDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING SERVICE STATION AND TO REOONSTRUCT A NEW SELF-SERVICE FUEL STATION WITH 1,500 SQ. FT. OF BUILDING AREA ENCOMPASSING A FOOD MARKET AND A CAR WASH, WTIH RELATED SITE ZiVROVEMENIS SECTION I• FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Oommission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described on Page 2 of this Resolution; and . WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application.; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the application meets the following requirements: a) That the use or uses are in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Cupertino, and are not detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. b) That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to accommdate the proposed use. c) That the proposed use will not generate a level of traffic over and above that of the capacity of the existing street system. d) That the proposed use is otherwise not detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed uses, nor injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. NOW, THERE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application 17-U-90 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning o mnission Meeting of October 29, 1990, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Resolution No. 10/29/90 Page -2- Application No(S) r, Applicant: Chevron Pjesearrh and Technol Property • Cupertino Oro C Incation: Northeast: Corner of De Anza Blvd. 9-0 e tres ea Parcel Area: . 75 SEMCN III: CONDITIONS AMINISTERID BY ME PUBLIC VX)WS DEPAKIIMM Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by • the City Engineer. 2. CURB AND GAITER IMPIdOVEhTIIJIS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City. c'•191- Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Ordinance 1143. • 5. Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. I a,_elz, 1sI I�• 41� �- The developer shall conply with the requirements of the Urxiergro ud Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plants showing utility undexground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. Resolution No. 10/29/90 Page -3- ��1•,�aseia� ;��• �atia�I! The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for underci rounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. CITY ENGINEER'S CERITFICATE OF • ACCEPPANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS (Section 66474.10 CA Gov't. Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section III of this Resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices. Travioe Whitten, Asst. City Erg. a r �6il� 4�_ • ;!+d� yy?i a� y:� ����11�l4St • �1I� • �e�?u! � �•;_.�4y�a�! The recommendation of approval is based on Sheet Al (3/15/90), and on Sheet SN 1 (2/14/89), except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 10. MODIFICATION OF APPR—OVLD DEVELOPMEN r PLAN In the event that the applicant or subsequent property owner shall desire to make any minor changes, alterations or amendment of the approved development plan, a written request or revised development plan shall be submitted to the Director of Planning and Development. If the Director makes a finding that the changes are minor and do not result in a material affect upon the appearance or function of the project, said changes may be certified on the revised plan. If approval of said changes is withheld, the applicant may appeal to the Planning Commission. If the Director fiends that the requested changes are material, such changes shall be referred to the Planning Commission for approval. If the changes are denied by the Planning cammnission, the applicant may appeal to the City Council as provided in City Ordinance No, 652. If said charges are approved by the Planning commission, an appeal may be made to the City Council by any interested party. Further, any Member of the City Council may request a hearing before the City Resolution No. 10/29/90 Page -4- Council regarding said approved dianges. Said request shall be made within ten (10) days fran the date of approval of said changes by the Planning Camnission. The subject use permit authorizes the construction and operation of a single -stall car wash, food market, and fueling stations as depicted on the exhibits listed in condition 9 above. B4uipment installed in the car wash structure shall replicate the sound generation characteristics described in the Fitzroy/Dobbs study of July 12, 1990 as contained in City file 17-U-90. 12. HOURS OF OPERATION • The car wash facility shall operate only between the hours of 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM daily. Operation of the food mart and fuel pumps shall be restricted to the hours of 6:00 AM to 11:00 PM daily per previous use permit 55-U-87. 13. ON -SITE PARKING All automobiles parked on site shall be placed in striped off-street parking as shown in the final development plan approved by ASAC. 14. OONSFRVATION MEASURES Operation of the car wash facility shall be limited to the one -minute wash -dry cycle option only. Said facility small also be fitted with water recycling equipment. The intent of this condition is to reduce water usage demand associated with car wash activity. 15. SITE DEVELOPMENT Final site development approval is subject to ASAC review. The final site development plan shall include a fifteen foot landscaping buffer installed along the northern property line and shall eliminate parking and trash enclosure uses along that boundary. In conjunction with this review, ASAC shall evaluate the architectural style of the proposed facilities for cocipatability with the Cupertino De Oro Club and the Portofino townhome development. 16. TRANSIT PULdrOUP A transit pull-out shall be located along Sunnyvale -Saratoga Road subject to approval by the city's traffic engineer. The property owner shall record an appropriate easement document allowing for placement of transit turn -out improvements and public sidewalks over private property. Said easement document shall be subject to approval of the City Attorney prior to recordation. Driveway width shall be reduced to 32 ft. as directed by the City Traffic Engineer. Resolution No. 10/29/90 Page -5- L• ! WAI 4>a Wo 0 ASAC shall approve a final landscaping plan and a final tree preservation plan. The tree preservation plan should be approved by a registered arborist and should be specific to the site. Replacement of specimen trees, if suggested in the arborist's report, shall include boat -specimen scale replacements of California Native Variety. r yy.e�•.y. Signing indicated on the exhibits referenced in condition 9 above is not approved, and shall require separate ASAC approval. PASSED AND ADOPPED this 29th day of October, 1990 at a Regular meeting of the Planning Ommissicn of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: Robert Cowan Director of Canomity Development \per- s\17u90 John Claudy, Chaitiman O.rpertino Planning Comnissicn Il U CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 TORRE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CAUFORNIA 95014 MINUTES OF THE REGULA EETING OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW MMITTEE OCTOBER 11,1990 8:0 M. CONFERENCE ROOM Low tovel ORDER OF BUSINESS ROLL CALL Mackenzie, Cowan, absent Mark Caughey, City Planner, att ed for Bob Cowa ACTION Approved minute 9/27/90 as published Vote - Brown, Viskovich, Caughey, Chairman Goldman Application No. (s) 17-U-90 and 25-EA-90 Applicant Chevron Research/Technology Co. Properly Owner Cupertino De Oro Club Location Northeast corner of Homestead Rd. and De Anza Blvd. USE PERMIT to demolish existing service station Improvements and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 5,700 s.f. of building area encompassing a food market and car wash, with related site improvements. ISSUES: 1) Sound report update: The accoustical consultant demonstrated that the ambient noise level identified for a single -day reading is reliable over a wider sampling period. 2) The supplementary traffic report demonstrated that the car wash portion of total trip activity is less than that of the existing service bays, and does not alter the 75% "pass - by" trip rate. ACTION: Motion was passed to recommend a Negative Declaration. Vote: Aye - Brown, Viskovich, Caughey, Chairman Goldman • CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 TORRE AVENUE, CUPEIZIINO, CALIMMIA 95014 (408) 252-4505 SORPM MINUTES OF THE RSMMAR MEETING OF THE AN"ITE APPROVAL CC:ASITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPEPTINO FOR ocicm a,1990, MEEiiNG HEIR IN CONFE32FIICE ROOM A, CITY MtE,,AT 10300 TORRE AVENUE, CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA The meeting was called to%Gong, PM by Chairman Present Members: ChairW , and JaGcson Absent Members: Hoxsie Staff Present: Tom Robill4d, Planner II - None. INFURMAL REViFii (Continued from August 27, 1990 ASAC Meeting) 1. Anglication ASAC 17-U-90 - Chevron Research -TechnologyOompanv - Requesting early review of a use permit to demolish existing service station improvements and reconstruct a new self service fuel station With 5,700 sq.ft. of building area encompassing a food market and car wash, with related site inprovements. Site is located at the northeast corner of Homestead Road and De Anza Blvd. Tom Robillard reviewed the staff conments, noting staffs concerns regarding the removal of two specimen sixty inch diameter eucalyptus trees, the requirement of a fifteen foot planter strip along the north property line, minor changes by the Traffic Engineer at the bus duck out on Saratoga/Sunnyvale Road, and the location of the trash enclosure adjacent to the northerly apartments. Bill Scutter and R. D. Wahlen, Chevron Research Company, reviewed staff camnents explaining that making any modifications would probably reduce the amount of landscaping or removal of trees in another area. They answered questions of the committee members. Chairman Gong questioned the on -site circulation pattern. Committee Member Weber questioned the hours of delivery of fuels. Mr. Robillard responded that delivery hours would be regulated in the Use Permit and are generally limited between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 11:00 P.M. ASAC Minutes for the meeting of October s, 19go Page -2- Coamdttee Member Jackson stated she had no problem with the removal of the two eucalyptus trees. She further stated that she had no preference for the landscaping strip along the north property line. Committee Member Lim stated he had no concerns of removing the eucalyptus trees. He suggested that area be used either for parking or for the trash enclosure. He further suggested the possibility of reducing the required planter strip along the north property line to ten feet. Committee Member Weber stated the planter strip should be included and suggested moving the trash enclosure to the eucalyptus tree location and make the proposed trash enclosure space a parking space. He stated he had no concerns with removing the two eucalyptus trees and further suggested reducing the required number of parking to four spaces. chairman Gong also stated he had no concerns with removing the two eucalyptus trees, but should be replaced with a minimum 36 inch box tree of native species. He suggested the sound wall at the north property line be reduced as low as possible and reducing the required planter strip to eight to ten feet. He further stated that he had no concerns with the trash enclosure location as proposed but would like to see it moved if possible. The general consensus of the Committee was that there is no concern with removing the two specimen eucalyptus trees, a planter strip should be provided along the north property line, and moving and relocating the trash enclosure and parking spaces is advisable, and to replace the two specimen eucalyptus trees with a minimum 36 inch box native California trees. 0 (Old Items) 2. Amliggkign ASAC 51,908.1 - Westfield Incorporated Recjqest3m review and a of a sign exception for a freestanding eeway oriented sign for an sting regional shopping center 1 at Wolfe Road between Stevens Boulevard and I-280. Tom Robillard review the staff ts, noting that ASAC had reviewed this application ore and ed denial. City Council asked ASAC to review the t signs only, with the economic viability and visibility of Tonal shopping center in mind, and also to include the worts ino on a sign. He further noted the general co of previous ASAC approval was that the " is blue directional si ' should be looked into. John Endicott Terry Ferrera, Westfield ted, reviewed the staff and answered questions of the members. Mr. F]xiioot explained the need and importance for the sh irhg center to have visibility from the freeway. CWOFCEW22ZEM 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408)252-4505 To: Architectural and Site Approval Oommuittee From: Thomas Robillard, Planner II Subject: Staff oonments for the Regular Meeting of October 8, 1990 INFCRKAL (Continued fran August 27, 1990 Meeting) 1. Amlication ASAC 17-t3-90 Chevron Research/Tecbmloav Co. - Requesting early review of a use permit to demolish existing service station iuprovanents and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 5,700 sq.ft. of building area a n++passing a food market and car wash, with related site improvenents. site is located at the northeast corner of Homestead Road and De Anza Blvd. Enclosures: - Site plan dated December 12, 1988 Elevations dated February 8, 1989 (2,Sheets) Oonmieruts ASAC cocments are requested and will be forwarded to the Planning Commission. ASAC previously reviewed and continued this application in order for the applicant to revise the exhibits to address the concerns of staff and show the location of the bus chick -out. Staffs concerns are as follows: A) Removal of a 60 inch Eucalyptus tree and the preservation of another 60 inch Eucalyptus tree. The arborist report explains that the decay is present throughout both trees and may pose isignificant hazards if development oocurs. Staff feels that the loss of one of the large Eucalyptus trees will significantly reduce the visual and historic draracteristics of the adjacent Cupertino Del Oro Club. Grading and paving impacts around the other Eucalyptus tree will have long-term negative impacts. B) The General/Cocmuer.-cial Guidelines require that a 15 foot planter strip be included on the north property line which is adjacent to a large residential development. The indicated parking stalls will need to be moved to a new location. C) Staff is ring a bus duck -out to be located along Sunnyvale Saratoga Road. The subject area will not require any further dedication but will require an easement. The Traffic Engineer has reviewed the proposal and will make some minor changes. D) The trash enclosure located at the north property line is very Staff its October 8, 1990 Page -2- close to the adjacent apartments. Staff is reommending it be moved to a different location in order to mitigate the possible objectional effects to those residents. Precise lighting, landscape, and signage plans will be br=jht back to ASAC for final approval. FCI*M REVIFh1 (Old items) 2. 51,908.1 -Westfield Requesting review and of a sign ewoepticn far a non -building mounted y cri sign far an existing regional shopping center located lfe Road Stevens Creels Boulevard and I-280. Previously, C denied the sign exception for free standing, free�ray-oriented sign proposals far an existing :the ional shopping center. The d was based upon the,firrlings t nature of the use identified the freeway -oriented 'gn s not require freeway -oriented si ge; and denial of reeway signage does not result in pract%i difficulties, hardships or inconsistencies with purpose and intent f the sign ordinance. The• general consensus the last meeting was that a "generic" blue freeway infornati sign d be acceptable as long as it included other businesses, investigation by staff with Cal Ttans found that the state wil allow signs on the freeway right of way and any sign directly or toward the freeway requires state permits. The City Council voted return this item to ASAC to review again. council was very sympathe . toward Is reasons for denial, but felt that the econanic viab ity of the and its visibility from the freeway is important well. The City it asked ASAC to omisider • the two monument si only with ino included on the sign. Several Counci indicated they will Id ASAC's final decision on this particular Based upon Council's direction to ASAC the sign, staff will formul an appropriate resolution based ASAC's final decision. F]icl eet 1 revised September 25, 1990 eet 2 revised September 25, 1990 - Minutes of the City Council meeting of September 17, 1990; Pages 13, 14, and 15. ASAC Resolution for denial No. 1566 CITY OF C U P E R T I N O 10300 T RRE AVENUE, CUPERMM, CALIFaIIJIA 95014 (408) 252-4505 SUMMARY PM&n .S OF THE REGULAR DGMING OF THE AA=7=URAL AND SITE APPROVAL 0=4r= OF THE CITY OF CLIPEMM40 FOR SEPrHiBFR 24, 1990, MEEr7M HELD IN CMMMENCE FDCH A, CM HALL, AT 10300 TCHII2E AVENUE, alien 4o, CWI Fo d The meeting was called to order at 7:35 PM by Chairman Gag. ROLL C7�II, Present Members: Chairman Gong, Hcxsie, Lim, Weber, and Jackson Staff Present: Tom Robillard, Planner II . POS ECKRUMMIAR70MM TO THE A[T3aA 2. pgylication ASAC 17-U-90 - Chevron Research/Technology Co. - Applicant request continuance to the meeting of October 8, 1990 on a 4-0 vote. The application was continued to the meeting of October 8, 1990. FIIi11TEN AM VERBAL CL?lQiIC74TICN None. — — (Continued fram September 10, 1990 ASAC Meeting) 1-1 1. Amlication ASAC 14-U-90 - Terry Brown Coratrvction - RequestiM early review of,a use permit to construct four single family dwel in a Planned Development Zone of the Marta Vista area. fffo-.� coated at the northeast • Corner of ianita Avenue and Orange Tom Robillard reviewed the staff cmwerits noting concerns with repetitious architecture for each building. Terry Brawn, of Terry Br�,00nstruction lained that he would be willing to modify each of the- our units in order to provide some architectural difference. He answered questions of the Committee. Committee Member Hoasie concerns with the width of each lot. He also noted that the y portion of the -bulge visible from the street were the gatag He suggested that the building's setback be staggered. Chairman Gong�orx=red with Committee Member Hoosie the suggestion of reversing floor plan on Lot 2 in order to provide more setback to Lots 3 4. ittee Member Weber expressed concern for the window orientation on second floor to the adjoining property owners. ASAC Minutes for the Meeting of September 24, 1990 Page -2- . Aglication ASAC 31-U-88 - Lucas Dealership Requesting review and \ approvval of a Planned Development sign program for an office build liocated at 19930 Stevens Creek Boulevard, southwest corner of StI7 CIreejC Boulevard and Finch AVesnie. Tom 14obillard reviewed the staff comments noting that ASACCpx�viiously provided direction to the applicant for his sign program. applica%ion was the formal approval of the sign program. stated staff's concerns with the amount of square footage of the�igns and the number of signs facing Stevens Creek Boulevard. Craig Maynard, Cal -Neon Signs, explained the reasons why three signs were needed and explained the location of each sign,," Tea Mackin, Incas Dealership, explained Chairman on regarding the layout,of the building and the neW for three signs. • CWMittee Member Lim s�b}ted that he thought signs were okay, but should be scaled down to,peet the 70% rule.,/Committee Member Jackson concurred with Cammittee Member Lim. Chairman Gong expressed conch{ about true readability of the sign if the sign was reduced in size. C�=ittee Member Hoocsie stated that 18 inch high letters were more than sufficient and only one auto nAupn sign next to Finch was necessary. DDCISICN: i On a 3-2 Vote with CXnmittee,MembeTs ie and Weber dissenting. Application ASAC 31-U-88 w9s approved wi Condition 10 deleted, Finding 1 modified, and FpxlinJ 2 added to Finding 1 - The s c' program is oohs with Title 17, Section 17.24.270 of the Q#ertino Municipal Code. Finding 2 - Dice to the lot configuration and teCtural style, three signs axe required for safe visibility. 4. - itimhg review and for a new ATM machine at an existing ing center located at the southwest corner of North De Anza evard and =3ardreviewed the staff coments noting that comments the Sheritf's crime Prevention Unit were still not available. Dave , on -Thine Construction, and J. D. Vanderlaan, owners represerhtative, questions of the Oacmittee Members. CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 TORRE AVENUE, CUPFRTINO, CALIFORNIA 95014 (408) 252-2052 SUMMARY MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEE IW OF THE AND SITE APPROVAL CCFYIL= OF THE CITY OF CUPER11 O FOR SMn MBER 10, 1990, MF3 TIM HMD IN OONFEUNCE ROCM A, CITY HALL, AT 10300 TOME AVENUE, CUPERSIIJO, QUaFUMIA. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 PM by Vice Chairwoman Jackson. Salute to the Flag. ROLL 98U Present Members: Vice Chairwoman Jackson, Lim, and Weber Absent Members: Chairman Gong, Hoxsie Staff Present: Tom Robillard, Planner II Item 1) Tentative October 8, 1990. Letter fnart W�ertino Do Oro Club dated September 4, 1990. !�L •'ti�._ :.�11- � •!fl1���11a� �._! y r �y ' � yi��lY��. Item 1) Anolication ASAC 17-U-90 Chevron Research Technoloav Cb Requesting early review of a use permit to demolish existing service station improvements and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 5,700 s.f, of building area encompassing a food market and car wash, with related site improvements. Site is located at the northeast corner of Homestead Road and De Anza Blvd. Tan Robillard reviewed the staff comments, noting staff's concern with the removal of the two specimen eucalyptus trees. He added that a 15 ft. planter strip would be installed along the north property line. Also, the lighting plan will need to be revised to reduce the amount of off -site glare and a bus duck -out will be required. Bill Scudder, Chevron Inc., explained the proposal and answered questions from the Committee. Doris Hi jmans, Cupertino De Oro Club, expressed terns with the proposed bus duck -out and ASAC Minutes 9/10/90 Page -2- explained that the Cupertino De Oro Club would be amenable to removing the two eucalyptus trees. DBCISION: Based upon new information not previously addressed in the staff comments, ASAC requested this application be continued to the meeting of September 24 in order for the applicant to revise his exhibits in accordance with the new information. Item 2) AWlication ASAC 15-U-90, Robert H. Lee and Assn iatpa Requesting early review of a Use Permit to reconstruct existing service station, with increase of building area f \ 1,300 s.f. to 1,950 s.f. Site is located at the northwest of De Anza Blvd. and Bollinger Road. \ DECISION: a 3-0 vote, Item 2 was continued to the end of t�a�rneeting due a conflict of timing with the Planning CaRniss�q►f mmeeting. Item 3) Staff requesting a draft tree ordinance. DDCISION: On a 3-O\,wte, ASAC mltiinied' Item 3 to the meeting of September 24 in order to /fully analyze the proposed ordinance and`to allow the t11O committee members not pent to comment. / Item 4) aquestina review and approval of a sign on €or a non -building mounted freeway oriented sign for an anal shopping center located at Wolfe Road between Creek Bo(4evard aryl I-280. Tom Rabillard awed the staff m ,noting that there are two freeways' sign proposals for a pylon sign, the other for off -site aiomopot signs. He explained that the exception from the requirement far frecZy-oriented signs to be building -mounted, and size limitations. off -site monument signs �d also need an exception far the prohibition of ofP-si freestanding signage. Mr. Robillard that the ion be granted for the pylon sign, me is the pcu�oses and intent of the sign ordinance. �ohn Endi.00tt, Westfield, Inc., reviewed staff comments and / explained Westfield's purposes and intent for freeway-oriO 7 40 CITY OF CLUnTa]m 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408)252-4505 To: Architectural and Site Approval CmuLittee From: nymos Robillard, Planner II Subject: Staff Ocnments for the Regular Meeting of August 27, 1990 INFUMM REVIEW 1. Aiolication ASAC 17-U-90 - Chevron Resear h/TecinolMM Camarhv Requesting preliminary review of a use permit to demolish existing service station improvements and reconstruct a new self-service fuel station with 5,700 sq. ft. of building area enoanpassirg a food market and car wash with related site improvements. The site is located at the northeast corner of Harnstead Road and DeAnza Boulevard. Enclosures: • - Site plan dated December 12, 1988 - Elevations dated February 8, 1989 ASAC tents are requested and will be forwarded to the Planning Commission regarding a new service station including gas dispensing, convenience shop, and a car wash. Stafffs concerts are as follows: A) Removal of a 60-inch eucalyptus tree and the preservation of another 60-inch eucalyptus tree. The arborist report explains that extensive decay is present throughout both the specimen trees and may pose significant hazards if development occurs. Staff feels that the loss of one of the large eucalyptus trees will significantly reduce the visual and historic characteristics of the cupertino Del Oro Club which is adjacent to the east property line. Grading and paving impacts around the other 60-inch eucalyptus tree will also have long-term negative impacts. B) The General/Commercial Guidelines require that a 15 foot planter strip be included can the north property line which is adjacent to a large residential development. Precise lighting, landscape, and signage plans will be brought back to ASAC for final approval. 2. AAmlication ASAC 15-U-90 - Robert H. Lee and Associates Requesting early review of a use permit to reconstruct an existing service statioah with increasing a building area from 1,300 sq. ft. to 1;95o sq. ft. The sit --is located at the northwest corner of DeAnza Boulevard and Bollinger Road-.— C.1TY\OF CUPERTINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10300\Porre Avenue Cupertitlo, CA. 95014 (406) 252 4505 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF TUR PLANNINO/COHMISSION HELD ON JANUARY 2H, 1990 // SALUTE TO THE FLAG. 110LI. CALL: \ ' Commissioners Present: C'airman Mackenzie vi2s Chairman Fazekas Commssi,oner Mann Commis loner Mahoney Comml'ssi%ner Austin Staff Present: jtobert C., , Director of • 11/Community Deb@@lopment / Michele Bjurmah Planner I j Charles Kilian, -ity Attorney APPROVAL OF MIIN'UTES: MOTION: Copy. Fazekas moved to approve the minu s of the January 1.4, 1991, as amended SECOND: ,/'Com. Mann VOTE: / Passed 3-2 ABST7�IN: Com. Mahoney, Com. Austin POSTPONEMENTS OR NEW AGENDA ITEMS: ITEM 1: Application 17-U-90 (Chevron) - Staff requests continuance to the meeting of February 11, 1991 —0 ITEM 2: �ppliation 20-U-86 (Amended) (JMB Proper ) - Staff requests continuance to meeting of February 25, 1991 i ITEM 3: Avalicatlon 16-TM-90 (�Sobrato) "' - Staff requests continuance to the meeting of February 11, 1991 MOTION: Com. Fazekas moved,to continue items 1, 2, and 3 to the dates indicated above 19 SECOND: Com. Mann \ VOTE: Passed 5.0 WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: - None ORAL COMM CATIONS: - None \ • DATE: CITY OF CUPERTINO COMPANY: Community Development Department 10300 Torre Avenue FAX NUMBER: Cupertino, CA 95014 Telephone: (408) 777-3308 0 NUMBER OF PAGES: (INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET) FAX: (408) 777-3333 / • FROM' ❑ Nklele Burman ❑ Bob Cowan ❑ Pam Eggen ❑ Vera GH ❑ Cohn Jane ❑ Yvonne KsUey ❑ Tom Robillard traddy WordeU NOTES: S<C7�ni� iVirC,� T/ �vG FAX TRANSMISSION NOV-28-1994 13:29 FROM LAW OFFICES TO 7773333 P.01 Law Offices of Charles T. Kilian 1740 Technology Drive, Suite= 'Xodak Center' • San Jon, California 98110 a Telephone r0081441.7800 i TAX (e08) 441.7302 Charles T. Kilian FAX TRANSMISSION Date:�ov •�� To: god t�tJtc�QN Fax Number. (mm) 7;� 7-- -9 33 3 From: C Our Phone: (408) 441-7800 Our Fax: (408) 441-7302 No, of pages including cover page: Y Message: —t4 P RrP$ ov I La cv Please call if you experience any, transmission problems. The material contained in this transmission may be confidential and is intended for use by the recipient(s) only. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact this office at (408) 441-7800 immediately. Thank you. nance re located in ;es conferred any county those rights the zoning iditions: rise within a uts oubstan- ,oration does epair, if that ;es and does the sale of ally or par - lent, if the IIS1neste used )5§1. it fund .oases"t M 1(3) added or' in tit 41. t wine and licenses m; uor hermit ,r wr+ti0' LICENSING RESTRICTIONS 4 13790.5 Measurement of distances for purposes of enactment prohibiting 111cor hrns,e for a4, or intoxicating liquoi within liven distance from churc univenit), u:htool. or other institution or property as base. 4 ALR3d 1250. Validity of municipal regulation more restrictive than stale r uiatson as to time for selling or serving intoxicarinie liquor. 51 ALR3d 1061. Zoning regulation of inroxicating liquor as preempted y state law. 65 ALRsth 555. N(YM OF Section confers upon tpurran and olio the right to control districts in whiob .anon tYPat, of liquor buun les could be tarried on by enactment of valid tudng ordinances. and e-en the* excluding of liquor business of any type in aaLin zone don have erect or denying in adnne' all ap)Jioatlens for liquor liceirses in that zone. such result is nprealy authorized by section, whicit in turn legislation authorized by Conu Art XX ¢ Town Council of Lee tiara' v Sbte >id of lath" (1956. Ise Dist) 141 Cal App Zd 296 Pld 909. section only requires that then be a zoning v.dinaxe.red that exercise or.grits and -vikgq .d licen34 sought to be issued would be ontrary to rat provialtsns; section does not ire sp=iac lindexilan against sale or skohodc go in Jolgnaten area. Town Council Los Gatos v 9lne lid. of Equalization (1956. Dist) 141 Cal App 2d 344. 296 P2d 909. Onntins on•"le into icatiag IIgnor llw— to oabl'nhtnsnt operating with ly bur and wine :emst under nonvvelformi rise is unwarranted mlarstment of use. Town d of Los Gatos v late Bd 4 Equalisation 195(. tell Dist) 141 Cal 4p9 Zd 344.296 P2d 1'msrsion of Becton tr IT exereepta'actroonformfng ^t wch as an4u}le 'quor ettablishmenL from u cilnarte not include use which had •ea,td for years be effective date of ordinance "A 'k"ea Years are renewal appiiution was "'le Town Co oil or Los Gnu v Stare Ltd. of i'i"tiimlon (1 6. lst Dist) 141 Cal App Id 344. : as P2d 909. ufdi cis canna single out and prohibit hou r-,a tuebi there must be reasonable Matt of districts and in any zoning district in wh other retail businesses an alloyed to be eon ettd. tt u z, no proasbly would be unrea• so le and arbitrary to exclude sale of liquor. T Council of Los Gatos v State Bd. of Equall• Tian (1956. Ist Dist) 141 Cal App 24 3". 296 P2J 909. In granting off -sale liquor license to super Maria located on [rut subyect to restrictive covenant arsine sak Ire intnueating Isquors. Depasturant of Alcohohc Beverage Control properly determined that existence of covenant did not justify board in holding that Its violation would be matter affecting pieh!i.- anlfara and morab wets felt parties to eovatan[ to resort to courts if so advised. since only legislative enactment restricting licensing power of department for issuance of lieaw to pvea lso located in territory when: exercise of rights thereunder would be contrary to valid ton• fell ordinance. Board of Trustees v Muelro (1958, 3rd Dist) 163 Cal App 2d 440. 329 P2d 765. City zoning ordinance prohibiting establishment of cocktail bar or lounge within 200 feet of resident. tial district without use permit did not farads field tsltemated by -rate under uotuto deallua with licensing of sale of intoxicating liquors. sloee ofdi- nance in question was valid exercise of city's right to control districts in which various types of liquor butinns could be comical on. Flurests. Inc. v City Council of San Leandro (1961. Ise Dist) 190 Cal App 2d 399. 12 Cal Rpir 182. Legislature has expressly negatived its inrmt to extend state oon[ 0 to zoning matters through exercise of Its liquor license authority under this section and ¢ 23791; local zoning ordinance may validly prohibit use of property for bu4iasa of selling liquor. Jon .Mar Co, v Anaheim (1962. 4th Dist) 201 Cal App 2d 832. 20 Cal Rptr 350. fe3379o-s, Sale of beer and wine in conjunction with sale of motor hicle fuel I'll 11 is the intent of the Legislature in enacting this section to ensure 1h�'t local government shall not be preempted in the valid exercise of land use authority pursuant to Section 23790, including, but not x"`c °lsu thecin entnofrthenLegi aturregto preventnthe 1 gislated hibitionr. of the concurrent retailing of beer and wine for off- 415 OFFICES M 13,32 FROM: Z3790.5 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, prernises ccrisurnpt-on and vactur vehicle fue! where the reiailing,of C.-ch is C!her%ise allowable- (b) (1) No city, •county, or city and County shall, by ordinance or i resolution uLlopied on or after January 1, 1988, legislatively prohibit the concurrent retailing of inorar vehicle fuel and beer and wine for Lofr-szde consumption in zoning districts where the zoning ordinance allows motor vehicle fuel and off -sale beer and wine to be retailed on separate sites. (2) On and after January, 1, 1989, no city, county, . oi. city. and , i6ounn y ordinance or resolutioni adopted prior to`May 5,A987, ihalllfiivc legal effect 'if- it lc_&Iatively Orobibits, the concurrent retailing of motor vehicle fuel with beer and wine for of sale consumption in zoning districts°whcre the Wiling ordinance allows beerland'win6 and,m6tbr i ichide fuel i t6b6 . retailed, on, separate sites. (3)On.axzd after,July 1, 19$8, no city, county, or city and county ordinancC_'.or:rcsbl4ticrn' adopted on or after May 5. 1987, shall have kgai'effe6t if it legislatively prohibits the concurrent retailing of motor vehicle fuel with beer and wine for off -sale consumption in zoning districts where the zoning ordirianceallows beer wind wine and motor vehicle fuel to be retailed on separate sites. (4)'This,scction shall not apply to a prohibition by a city, county, or city and county of the sale of bee" and wine in conjunction with the We of inotbi vehicle fuel if that prohibition occurs as a result of the pmhibitibn of the. combining of the sale of motor vehicle fuel with a broi'dix class of products or uses which includes alcohnlic beverages or bier, afid wine as u named or unnamed part of that larger clam if that prohibition was enacted before August 1, 1985. (c) Subject to the restrictions and limitations of subdivision (b), tWI sccrion shall not prevent a city, county, or city and county frosty denying permission, or granting conditional permission, to an individ- ual. applicant to engage in the concurrent retailing of motor vclxicI4 fuel with beer and wine for off -premises consumption pursuant to 2 valid: Conditional use permit ordinance based an appropriate healthy: safety, or genend welfare standards contained in the ordinance if that conditional use permit ordinance contains all of the following: (1), 4 requirement for written findings. governing body. NO ,(2)A,provisioii for -an administrative appeal Tthe delegated its 'power to issue -or deny a conditional use permit. and apt�i I . (3),Trocedurcs f6r notice of a.heiring, conductrof a licaninS opportunity for all parties to" presentaestinloay. : '• (4)A.requiremenvthavth6 116dings be based on substantial ;a'. in view 6f,the%iAole record to justify the ultimate derision- �1� ,'7Mr=r,=rxrnC sate Of as too' Will R111, The uriiC (C) 11 hit'. b6e oils AP Am-! X COIL; L4*; It :he retailing of j ordinance or itively prohibit r and wine for ning ordinance 1 be retailed on ;ity and county shall have legal til,of motor >a in /.oning Hine and motor :ity and county 987, shall have tailing of motor ption in zoning ,vine and motor city, county, of lnction with the s a result of the ticle fuel with a Aolic beverages a wr class, if iivision (b). this ad county frost n, to an individ- )f motor vehicle n pursuant to a 2ropriate health, ordinance if that rllowing. veining body b1l permit. i hearing, and as istantial evil, vision. ;tablishtnents th beer and, LICENSING RESTRICTIONS § 23791 for off -premises consumption shall, until January 1, 1994, abide by the following conditions: (1) No beer or wine shall be displayed within five feet of the cash register or the front door unless it is in a permanently affixed cooler as of January 1. 1988. (2) No advertisement of alcoholic beverages shall be displayed at motor fuel islands. (3) No sale of alcoholic beverages shall be made from a drive-in window. (4) No display or sale of beer or wine shall be made from an ice tub. (5) No beer ur wine advertising shall be located on motor fuel islands and no self -illuminated advertising for beer or wine shall be located on buildings or windows. (6) Employees on duty between the hours of 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. shall be at least 21 years of age to sell beer and wine. The standards contnincd in this subdivision are minimum state standards which do not limit local regulation otherwise permitted under this section. (e) Until January 1,1994, if there is a finding that a licensee or his or her employee has sold any alcoholic beverages to a minor at an establishment engaged in the concurrent %ate of motor vehicle fuel with beer and wine for off -premises consumption, the alcoholic beverage license at the establishment shall be suspended for a mini- mum period of 72 hours. For purposes of Section 23790, the effect of such a license suspension shall not constitute a break in the continu- ous operation of the establishment nor a substantial change in the mode or character of operation. (f) The provisions of this section apply to charter cities. Added scats 1987 eh 176 11. Amended Stan 1991 eh 109 4 1 (AB 140). ff-. iv* July to, 1991. 1401 Amcnd[eean Sutn[ituttd "January 1. 1994" for "January 1, 1990" wherever it Peals is subds d) and (e). dla[eral Refercnee>ti tjw Rcvierr Amcf s: Review of selected 1997 Legislation. 19 Facif[c LJ 473. C Z3791. Powers of cities conferred by zoning regulations tiothing in this division interferes with the powers of cities conferred "Pon them by Sections 65850 to 65861, inclusive, of the Government Code. 4'ed Slats 1953 eh 152 6 I. Amended Sam 1961 ch :52 9 1- Stars 1967 eh M q 1. 417 ORDINANCE NO. 1478 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO REGULATING THE CONCURRENT SALES OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND GASOLINE, AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF WHEREAS, Chapter 176 of the 1987 Statutes --of the State of California, codified as California Government Code Section 23790.5 which provides, inter alia, that no • City "shall, by ordinance or resolution adopted on or after January 1, 1988, legislatively prohibit the concurrent retailing of motor vehicle fuel and beer and wine for off -sale consumption in zoning districts where the zoning ordinance allows motor vehicle fuel and r off -sale beer and wine to be retailed on separate sites" and further provides that "this section shall not prevent a city, county, or city and county from denying • permission, or granting conditional permission, to an individual applicant to engage in the concurrent retailing of motor vehicle fuel with beer and wine for off -premises consumption and pursuant to a valid conditional use permit ordinance .."; and, WHEREAS, the public well-being will be greatly impacted unless a conditional use permit ordinance is enacted to provide for the administrative review of (CC.D21 i applications for the engagement in the concurrent retailing of motor vehicle fuel with beer and wine for off -premises consumption; and, WHEREAS, the absence of such a conditional use permit ordinance may affect those persons who wish to present the City with an applicant to engage in the activities described herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF • CUPERTINO: Section I. Ordinance No. is hereby enacted to read as follows: Section 1: Purpose: The purpose of'this Ordinance is to establish regulations pertaining to those establishments which concurrently sell motor • vehicle fuel and alcoholic beverages including beer and wine. Section 2: Application: This Ordinance shall apply to any establishment within a General Commercial (CG) zone which, pursuant to a conditional use permit, sells or proposes to sell, concurrently, alcoholic beverages including but not limited to beer and wine, and motor vehicle fuel. (CC.D21 2 Section 3: Granting of Use Permit: An establishment subject to this Ordinance may be permitted where they, in the opinion of the Planning Commission, are compatible with existing and planned uses in the particular zone or neighborhood. • Section 4: Public Hearing: The Planning Commission, after having received an application for a conditional use permit by any person proposing a use which is subject to this Ordinance, shall set a time for the holding of a public hearing therein. Any person may address the Planning Commission and present testimony regarding the particular conditional • use permit application. Section 5: Findings: written findings regarding the granting or denial of any conditional use permit subject to this Ordinance shall be made by the Planning Commission, and shall be based on substantial evidence in light of the entire administrative record. Section 6: Restrictions: Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any establishment subject to this Ordinance shall abide by the following restrictions: • (1) No beer or wine shall be displayed within five feet of the cash register or the front door unless it is in a permanently affixed cooler. (2) No advertisement of alcoholic beverages shall be displayed at motor fuel islands. (3) No sale of alcoholic beverages shall be made from a drive-in window. (4) No display or sale of beer or wine shall be made from an ice tub. (5) No beer or wine advertising shall be located on motor fuel islands and no self -illuminated advertising for beer or wine shall be located on buildings or windows. (6) Employees on duty between the hours of 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. shall be at least 21 years of age to sell beer and wine. Section 7: Appeals: A. Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Planning Commission under the provisions of this Ordinance may appeal said decision to the City Council [CC.D21 4 l by filing written notice of the appeal with the City Clerk within five days after the date of the decision. B. Said notice of appeal must state: 1. The asserted error: • 2. The grounds upon which said appeal is taken; and 3. The name and address of the party appealing. Said notice of appeal must be signed by the party appealing, or by his agent. Said notice of appeal shall not be effective unless it is filed with the City Clerk within the time required by subsection A, above. C. A public hearing shall be held by the City Council within thirty days from the date of the filing of the notice. D. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be given by mail, postage prepaid, and dispatched not less than ten days prior to the hearing to the applicant at his address as shown upon notice of appeal. G. The City Council shall hear the appeal. At Hip • -1 ision of t•h^ hearing, tho council may. affirm, reverse, or modify the action appealed; subject, however, to the provisions of this chapter. The findings and decisions of the City Council shall be entered upon the minutes of the City Council, and the decision shall be final and shall take effect as directed by the City Council. Section 8: Severability: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance • is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The legislative body hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional. • Section II. Enforcement. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and instructed to file a certified copy of this ordinance upon its becoming effective with the Sheriff's Office of the County of Santa Clara, State of California. Section III. This ordinance is an urgency measure necessary for the immediate preservation of the public [ CC. D2j 6 well-being and shall become effective immediately upon adoption. The facts constituting such urgency are: 1. Chapter 176 of the 1987 Statute of the State of California prohibits the legislative prohibition of the concurrent retailing of motor vehicle fuel and beer and wine for off -sale consumption, and allows such •applications to engage in such activities to be administratively reviewed pursuant to a conditional use permit application. 2. The City of Cupertino wishes to comply with said statute forthwith. 3. The lack of such a conditional use permit rdinance as described in said statute would be inimical to the public well-being in that persons who wish to engage in those activities described herein will not have an available administrative review process and those persons affected by such proposed activities will not have an available administrative review process. Section IV. The provisions of this ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and ;hall remain in effect until superseded by a revising ordinance. I M M PASSED FOR PUBLICATION OF TITLE this 19th day Of December 198.&, by the following vote: Vote: Members of the City Council: Ayes: Gatto, Johnson, Koppel, Rogers, Plungy Noes: None Absent: None Abstain: None ATTEST: APPROVED: /a/ Roberta Wolfe Isl John J. Plyune, Jr. Deputy City Clerk Mayor, City 0 Cupertino [CC.D21 8 CITY of CUPERTINO CCDE ENFCRCENEf q CFFCE • 10300 TCRRE AVE. CUPRRTIID, CA. 95014 252-4505 APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE LOCATION: 1/010 N.. DE ANgfl B(-Vi) • ° 72, CUP�RTI►JO, CA 9SD/L% TYPE OF BUSINESS: CAS STA Tlj)01eRR WASR1minis-/rJ!}ny. 46 APPLICANTS: AYrCR)C O P6R-S?WNEL SERyIce-s INc• TYPE OF LICENSE: OFF SAt.E (5EER AND WINE • POSTING DATE: • COMMENTS: POSTED 1N 7HE (DE57' Deavl- l IAIDO w Code Enforcement Officer 4--y STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL Grounds for Protest Against Applications for Beverage Licenses: (1) The premises are located within the immediate vicinity of a schonl, church, hospital or children's public play- ground any the normal operation of the licensed premises would interfere with their respective functions...........( ) (2) The premises are located in a residential area, and the normal operation of the licensed premises would interfere with the.quiet enjoyment of their property by the resi- dents of the area ......................................... ) (3) Licensing the premises would create a public nuisance, as defined in Penal Code Section 370, in that (the specific facts leading to this conclusion must be stated)..........( ) (4) Issuance of the license to the premises would tend to create a law enforcement problem or aggravate an already existing police problem ...................................( ) (5) Issuance of the license to the premises would result in or add to undue concentration of licenses .................( ) be • (6) Licensing the premises would contrary to the provisions of a valid zoning ordinance ...............................( ) (7) The applicant is not the true or sole owner of the business to be licensed ............................................( ) (8) The applicant (or manager of on -sale premises) has been convicted of a felony or of a crime involving moral turpi- tude, or of one of the offenses listed in subdivision (b) of Section 24200 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act....( ) • (9) The applicant (or manager of on -sale premises) has a record of chronic insobriety .....................................( ) (10) The applicant (or manager of on -sale premises) has a police record which disqualifies him for a license ...............( ) (12) COMMENTS O COPY___1 w..........�---------- APPUCATION FOR ALCOHOLIC 09VIRA09 UCEN33(3) To: Department of Alcoholic Mrnage Control 1901 Rroodway :3n JUnc S«romeno, Coif. 93810 uu.«o...... .no., The under"Unod hereby opphes for Imenw. docr,bed oa follows, 1. TYPE($) OF UCENSE(S) FILE NO. LirU11G SOOT an,! ;Una Applied uad., Sec. 240" ❑ Effective Datn RECEIPT NO. GEOGRAPHICAL CODE 43b3 Dale Issued 2. NAME(S) OF APPLICANT(S) Temp. Perms Effective Doer. : 1Ca.t 1 Jr1wiar.01 s r • ,LC:,m r It10. 2. TY►E($) OF 7RANSACTIOKU FEE LIC. TYPE vr:g anal $ Iu0.si0 au Annual 34.UU a. Name of Sulineu _.i0VrJ l S. location of Wfinm-Numbs and $#s t J 1 to1 U•'Ir. .aa�azs'(tiv.:. Ciry and 21p Code County :r ,•t j TOTAL 134.uU d. If M, r emcee s m.we _ Sha: Type OF LLUtensedite..y Gry Limits S. Mailing Address (if d.Rann1 From 3)-Number and Street ul Jvl•t^ )i ;au 14S, b4Sr9 9. Nme you ern bran convicted of a felny? 10. Have you ever violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Saverage Centtd Act or regulations of the Deportment per. :.jA CJr,,ora Lion feining to the Act? 11. E.plain a "YES" ons er N items 9 or 10 on an onachment which shall be deemed port of this application. 12. Applicant ogres (a) that any manager employed In on -sale licensed pemiw will have all the qualification. of o licensee, and (b) that he will not violate ar cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. 12. ;TA7EOF CALIFORNIA Counry'of------------------------------------- Date ------------------ -__-_._ a- «:'� ,�. w p;'.rN..« .«..,.rw�.. �r.. w 1«.we wN.«w. r+l. uw r..w r:..rN.«�.. In wra, rin rn.r » s.. r.s ��1•. �.r.. . F«I r yllrrl W.r.N y rM yN4rI'. y.i4rli a.rW.. M r rrr..e wr rM 14..«I.1 Ir .4W Nwr ..N4«r n rM, 1. r rw ti j, zes"a I.rw.., M . Iw. r .. INW « Y..r.r .+rw.e yr..r. rr•.. •.wr pS;• ` r� N.r ....4r N. +rnr .wllr.nr Ir aN w.r4 rM on sit—. r ew .w41,J . «N.rwa. w r Ir w w.iw N url✓r « �n,, ..��� oNw N +...1«ri Ifl rl,.r rM +.rlr ..eliur4r rr M .•N4... N wr+.r r...eeY.r. r M M.w« .eve M nrlrr I..e.4rr w •'..••..r,•nON.IZEEE=--��:-=---___°"i_Ic_=r`------- '---------------------------•---- ------------------- ------ APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR 13. STATE OF CAUPORNIA County of a.ew e.rry N e.rh+r..ere .r•..-.w..1«r.'•n. +.w•. MI.«..wxa.. w ..«. nl w 4 w. 1:...... r .. ..w..r.. Ns,. N rr .r...r Ili...... se y rti Ir.e.4•e +wlr .eN4erlrL n ..ewl.M w ..d. r44 +walr NN4.N.w «. !r e.e.11, nl rl,.r M 1•.rr4r r.« ..N.rw .. wn..e.r W y r tlr «. 1. W..r1N es. . e.l.w ..N M . .- .. I.. .erl:r Ir.. 11 wax +w.ir I..Tr.e Yr M aww, Ill rrr n. +wiw .vN4r4r M ••�.'•� eerwr^. ..r.r+e W r. Ar, Nwr Fr. «wN.e er 4r .w .W. r.. 4e..lw .rNi.rtr 1. al.nl e .•s r.. a-, r 4 e.y r rarM.. �I r Ir +.r .r.4w N I.w r Y /.l,wa w I.I.r. rrr «rirr N ...Nw«, In +.« r.. w«,.M ...Ili«I.. rr .+ .n.4ew, er .•e« rti p­:.+u.«wr N rY o-1 ----- ,�)• 11--1 17. 9a alurelf) of lknsn(.) Jy -� la. License Numbnb) M. location Numbn ad Streit City and rrp Code County Do Not Write Be(~ This Line; For Department Use Only Attached, ❑ Recordd notice, / s ❑ Fid-iory pope.. ❑-_-__- ------- -_—COPIES MAILED --------- __`___________-________-___. t/ ❑ Renwol, Fee of__________hid at --------- ------------------- Office on_ W----------- -Ansipt No. .__________________ uC e r I n.ea ■ CITY of CUPERTINO CCDE ENFCRCEIVEg CFFCE 10300 TCRRE AVE. CUPERTIN D, Chi. 95014 252-4505 . APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE LOCATION: 1655 CA5CIAi WALL RV C v r No CIA- I.svi TYPE OF BUSINESS: 0 F sA(-E C-EIve"L. LtavOR � S70R APPLICANTS: JH PEE LS i w c. TYPE OF LICENSE: C?Pfr 54(•C lr,-6,y6e- .( ! % . POSTING DATE: 11 / • COMMENTS: pOSTtb /N THE 5/C- I II,v.Dvw Code Enforcement Officer 0 17-�-go�.uoDJ :.r AN ESOP COMPANY R013ERT He LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1137 NORTH MCOOVVELL BOULEVARD - PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA 94954.1469 1707) 755.1800 Meiling Addr{al: P.O. Bo. 750808, Petaluma. CA 94975.090B Fax (7071 765-8908 I RIAN •. IITA Arc^,t.It April 22, 1994 N W. JO„N{ON ArcnitEC[ Mr. Dave Scannell A11-11t Building Inspector {TEVEN J. RATHER City of Cupertino, Dept. of Commercial Development `r`^"•" 10300 Torre Ave., CECIL R. aPIHCER Cupertino, CA 95014 Arc^�[Ect RAY al El,pl^.Er RE: BUILDING PERMIT RE -SUBMITTAL CLARIFICATION INFORMATION CHEVRON USA 11010 DE ANZA BLVD. CUPERTINO, CA Dear Mr. Scannell: The following is a list of items to be fulfilled before the building permit will be issued. This list was developed by Mr. Bruce Donohue on April 14, 1994. BUILDING DEPARTMENT: 1.) Complete special inspection form to include the following inspections: MASONRY: Subsequent Tests, (Mortar, Grout, Field Wall Prisms) Inspection of Placement and Grouting. STRUCTURAL STEEL: Shop identification and Welding Inspection. (Periodic inspection) 2.) Add/revise sheet T-24 (Mandatory Notes) include second pages to lighting and mechanical certificates of compliance. 3.) Confirm lateral bracing at main beam (16 by 45) at canopy column. Include web stiffeners. 4.) Revise Addendum sheet CX-5 to reflect seismic loading on 3 by 3 tube steel. 5.) Revise letter from soils engineer to define concrete yard conformity with soils report. Revise canopy footing requirements. 6.) Re-insert S-8 Mansard Framing Plan. Define all welds in details. 7.) Provide a letter verifying the roof slopes will meet state approval and building code requirements. 0 MARIETTA. GA SACRAMENTO. CA BELLEVUE. WA LA HABRA. CA Please note the plan check responses related to Madison Industries will be delivered to the city offices by courier this morning. PLANNING DEPARTMENT: Mr. Tom Robillard had two requests to he fulfilled. 1.) Submit color samples for the sound wall block wall. (See samples enclosed) 2.) Submit a cut sheet of the root' mounted equipment showing the height. This equipment will be screened from the public right of way due to the mansard roof placement. See enclosed description. Please forward the Building Department information to Mr. Bruce Donohue, plan checker and the Planning Department items to Mr. Tom Robillard. Your expedient service will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, ROBERT H�LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. George Psaledakis Job Captain encl. cc: Tom Robillard, Planning Dept. a ROBERT H. LEE 6 ASSOCIATES. INC. t� 2 TWA042,048A OUTDOOR UNIT IALL DPJW.W ON9 ARE N NCHESI X e A K.O. WITH HOLE `POWER SUPPLY t \ ! CIA. HOLE W VOLTAGE i 1 r' HI } LO 10 `7 8 URE TAPS VIE FITTING -1/4— a i E VIEW "X" !LOCATED BEHIND ACCESS P/ r! PRESSURE t L 34.3/4 38-7/8 TOP DISCHARGE AREA SHOULD BE UNRESTRICTED. UNIT SHOULD BE — — PLACED SO ROOF RUN-OFF WATER DOES NOT POUR DIRECTLY ON UNIT, 12'FROM WALLANDD ALL LD BE AT LEAST -- SURROUNDING SHRUBBERY ON TWO SIDES. OTHER TWO SIDES COMPLETELY UNOBSTRUCTED. 37 7/8 O.D. GAS LINE ,\— (FEMALE CONNECTION( 3/8 O.D. LIQUID LINE (FEMALE CONNECTION) KVILt VALVC HI SIDE SERVICE PORT LOW SIDE SERVICE PORT UOUID SERVICE VALVE From Dwp. 21C141496 Ray.2 k DATA SUSJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE 31 IIOIITII'�,TI'N I. February 14, 1994 Mr. Tom Robillard City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 CnnwlLrnfti in Horbrollurc and Arboncullurc 110 Box 3S55 Santa Rosa. CA 95.102 1707) 9353911 81 t &'Vti ILL', r V".,`^'t M- ays- YOW 'fnt L CC Clio Igo Re: Updated Tree Evaluation; Chevron USA Station, 11010 De Anza Blvd., Cupertino, California Tom, At your request we have reviewed a revised development plan for the above noted project. This plan illustrates a sound wall planned for the northern boundary of the project which significantly impacts an existing tree. Per this condition the following discussion is provided. 1) The sound wall proposed for the northern project boundary will be 6 to 8 feet high, and will require a continuous footing which is 3 feet, 6 inches wide. 2) Excavation for the wall footing must occur within one foot of the noted Schinus molle, Illustrated on the attached ,photocopy of the site plan. 3) The wall itself will be located only 2 feet, 6 inches from the tree's .trunk. 4) This tree is in reasonable health with good structural characteristics, and it would be reasonable to preserve it in a more conducive site configuration. 5) Under the proposed plan, significant pruning would be required to facilitate installation of the wall itself, and the crown would be disfigured and unbalanced as a result. 6) Excavation for the wall footing will remove at least 50% of the existing root system, and this activity will significantly destablize the tree, as well as significantly impact future health and vigor. The prognosis for long term survival with these impacts in place is very poor. 7) Based on the noted proposed development activities with significant impacts on future health and stability, it is strongly recommended that Mr. Tom Robillard 2/14/94 Page 2 this tree be removed and replaced with a suitable replacement specimen in a suitable location. 8) A review of the proposed plant legend indicates that 5 tree species are being utilized at this site as part of landscape improvements. Each is considered a suitable replacement for the species being removed in a general sense. However, if replanting in the same general vicinity is to occur, only Prunus "Krauter Vesuvius" or Arbutus unedo are considered appropriate due to their overall smaller s ture. Please feel free to contact me for further scussion on any t ee or landscape related matter. Sincerely, John C. Meserve Consulting Arboriculturist WCISA Certification #478 F-EB 06 194 161-31 Fay F 1 T-5 (2) 44 �i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 61 PEPPER TREE . REMAJN 4ww / �4 ; t� •1 1 1 1 , - - - - ' - ��- ' a-3- ►fir �'T =�...�.yv�u:. . S-4 (45) k'LlICCG ' V-1 (2) 0C-1 (320 S.F.)/�////// $1 1416PO V615A1NINbr :fit :.............. ,-`ow �Lhmv V-1(1) T-2 (1) op " FES 08 '94 16:31 4yH PETRLI T-5 (2) O ,W t I 1 u 1■i 2 EXISTING PEPPER TREE , TO REMAIN ( UA1ai �7(►N6f ?itw Wlt CC-2 (216 S.F.) 5-5 (6)- 0 G� $141tfd} i(1lIFiMllc J GC-3 (182 S.F.) V-1 (2) ,haw �%UAV T-2 (1) WEEK —S-4 10, o . ^' �Agr(AL ft P R Vmv. 11126193 N�Trt 5(lNNiVAd.E GtT►N"� I or'7, I Cit,4 of Cuperti"o t0300 Tone Avenue Cupe, ino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 252-4505 FAX: (408) 252-0753 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT March 3, 1993 Robert Picard Job Captain Robert H. Lee & Associates P.O. Box 750908 Petaluma, California 94975-0908 Subj: Application 17-11-90 - Chevron USA, Inc. at 11010 North De Alva Boulevard, Cupertino, California Dcar Mr. Picard: Your request for extension of the above referenced conditional use permit has been received and a public hearing dale scheduled as follows: City Council Meeting March 15, 1993 6:45 p.m. Cupertino City Council Chambers Please plan on attending this meeting for any questions that may be asked. Prior to that hearing date I would • appreciate a call to further explain the delay types (lint you refer to in your letter of Pcbruary 17, 1993. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me at (408) 2324505, extension 277. Sincerely, 4*04-1- Michele Bjurman Project Manager g!V=\1eum\picud AN ESOP COMPANY ROBERT H. LEE S11 ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTURE . ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1137 NORTH MCOOVVELL BOULEVARO • PETALUMA. CALIFORNIA 94954-1469 (7071 765-1660 MRII-Ij Adclr— P.O Bo. 750908, Putalume. CA 94975.0906 Fe. (7071 765-9908 eRIwN s nu n�n,itrr�c JONN W.JONNlON February 17, 1993 Ar.:hitert JOHN B NICKtl Ar�niteu BTIVEN J. KATTNlR Mr. Tom Robillard 4rr.h,tect City of Cupertino CFCIL R BPl NClR Architect Building Department JAMEB H RAY 10300 Torre Ave. E..tl ^per Cupertino, CA 95014 RE: CHEVRON USA, INC. 11010 DE ANZA BLVD. • CUPERTINO, CA SS q9-5700; RHL JOB #8937 USE PERMIT k17-U-90 Dear Mr. Robillard: According to our records, the Conditional Use Permit for the subject site is due to expire on March 18, 1993. We have experienced delays on this project which are beyond our control; however, Chevron does plan to reactivate this project and pull the necessary permits and start the construction sometime next year. There has been a lot of time and effort put into this project by the various city agencies, as well as by our office and Chevron. All of this time and money spent would be wasted if Chevron had to start the planning process over. We are hereby asking for an extension of the CUP. It is our understanding that a one year • extension can be granted by an approval committee. If there are any questions or problems please notify me at once. We appreciate your time and attention to this matter. Sincerely, ROBERT H..,FLEE E&& ASSOCIATES, INC. obert icard Job Captain 8937.101robiltanl. rip 0 MARIETTA. CA BACRAMENTO. CA BELLEVUE. WA LA HABRA. CA TANDEM rar:emCumo te•s CC•ateo (J C:Orate Real Estate Ara S to Ser, Ces t0a00 North Tantau Averue ACC 248.C4 C..Derhno CA9501a April 8, 1993 (4081285.3200 Mr. Robert Cowan Director of Community Development 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Dear Bob: I appreciate having had the opportunity to meet with you last Monday to discuss various issues about the General Plan and the next steps in the review process. As I noted, Tandem is particularly concerned about the prospects of a lengthy, expensive Specific Planning process that, for practical • purposes, could easily turn into an extension of the General Plan Review. Hence I thought I'd elaborate for you the reasons we believe a Specific Plan for the Vallco Planning Area is not warranted: • For high-tech companies like Tandem, our planning horizons continue to shrink. Today, we find it necessary to respond to company initiatives with shorter and shorter lead times due to rapid technological advances that cause our business strategies to evolve rapidly. This translates into the need to remain flexible so that we can plan and implement the "right" products (buildings) to house the newest initiatives. Hence, our process has become more one of "positioning". than planning. A traditional Specific Planning process seems out of step with • the pace of change facing today's companies, and could take up to a year to complete. Moreover, we do not believe the process will lead to a plan that has the longevity necessary to provide the City and the companies with a flexible, evolving bluepritjt for a changing future. • Prior to the commencement of the General Plan Review in early 1990, Tandem approached the City and requested that we be granted permission to proceed with an application for a development agreement. At the City's request, due to concerns about the burden it would place on staff time and the potential conflict with issues to be addressed in the General Plan Review, we deferred our request. We have spent the following three years participating in the General Planning process. Given the size of the Tandem land holdings, we believe that moving directly from the General Plan to a development agreement process will afford both Tandem and the City sufficient detail to understand the infrastructure, circulation and architectural issues necessary to establish an overall urban design character for the Tandem campus. Properties owned by Tandem, Hewlett-Packard and Westfieid comprise more than 90 percent of Vallco Planning Area lands. Westfield already has a development agreement that addresses urban design issues, and on several occasions over the last three years, Hewlett-Packard has mentioned its intent to apply for a • development agreement once the General Plan Review is concluded. Given the thoroughness and flexibility of the development agreement process, and any other reviews required by subsequent steps in the planning/permitting process, there is every reason to believe that a development agreement is a superior tool to that of a Specific Plan. Finally, we strongly encourage the City to resolve the issue of disaggregating the "excess" square footage in the General Plan, not deferring it to any subsequent phase. This will save a great deal of time and effort and provide the companies with the needed information on which to plan for the future. 40 Thank you again for the informative session and for being so receptive to our concerns. Although I will be out of town until April 20, 1993, 1 look forward to participating in the final stages of the General Plan process. Sincerely, C;5ohn Hailey cc: Richard Rosemeier John Endicott c 5;,;•!:•!AR!' :} •^=,;= - - •.'--.-::.;_:::' - ::•1?AC':' RE?CR: ( LE1R) 1993-.iqNERAL PLAN AMENZ;..'1E,1; and REPORT ?3tPARED FOR CITY OF CUPERTINO•' p��`h, iq:th VERY HELPFUL ASSIS:A.1Cc' by BOB COWAN and CIDDY WOROELL 04* �P BY JULIAN RICE April 11, 1993 Eighty five Percent of emplovees in Cupertino commute into Cupertino from other cities in California.(1) Any new INDUSTRIAL -OFFICE BUILDING will bring 90% off Employees in from outside Cupertino.(2) Traffic is very heavy at peak hour commute approaching GRIDLOCK (at De Anza -_Iomeitead-280 it's "Near Breakdown"; Stevens Creek, Bollinger, Prospect, etc "High Congestion.") (3) The Cupertino City Study, (NEXUS) states:"Additional Housing must be built before any additional Office -Industrial Construction is allowed." In the past two decals construction o n ustr a u ngs occurred without adequate Housing to match the jobs created. Along with the huge job increase, the housing shortage caused home prices to esculate out of the average employees' affordability. Whereas, undeveloped areas of California are desperate for more Industry. Cupertino can not accomo-� date more Industry in addition to the 543,000 sq ft of Permits Already Issued withoub Increasing Traffic to intolerable levels (opening of Extended 85 WILL NOT improve Cupertino traffic, per city study.) According to the City Report (NEXUS)':the INDUSTRIAL -OFFICE EXPANSION in the GENERAL PLAN would change Cu ert no to aT TgDer.zity F-Fan—GTongested City. The present Industrial ompan es came toCuper- tino because Cupertino was a pleasant residential town. These same Companies would find Cupertino undesirX)rable if the Industrial -Office expansion in the'General Plan was permitted. ' SNDUSTRIAL-OFFICE GROWTH IN GENERAL PLAN "NUMBER NUMBER - } Balance of New Apple Building SQ FT- EMPLOYEES E.TO CUPERTINO �- lto be occupied 46,380 il9 96 •. BUrLDINQ PERMITS' ISSUED?REEEE 220,520 567 471 • lbur3:tIV931993 3. BUILDING PERM3'f5'ISSUED 320,955 826 686 TANDEM'& BRIDGE 4. Additional Building•iniKodified 1,033,000 2,657 2,205 General Plan 5. Additional Building to be 2,000,000 5,160 4,283 "lowed if Cos. Agree to Reduced Traffic thru Traffic Mitigation Program TOTALS 3,620,855 9,329 7,741 ( TRAFFIC would be GRIDLOCKED with 7,741 Additional Commute CaRS Every-aay) 10/08/1993 13:05 4153242386 YAL.E INVESTiEN7 CO PAGE 02 Yale Iny4tment Company OCTOBER S. 19�3 CITY OF CUPER INO DEPT. OF COX TY DEVELOPMENT 10300 TORRES VENUE CUPERTINO, CA6 95014 ATTN: PLANNING COMMISSION RE: APPLICATION NO.17-U-90 (MODIFIED) PROPERTY OWNS : CUPERTINO DE ORO CLUB LOCATION: 11010 DE ANZA BLVD. THE RYSIDENTS't OF THE VILLA CAMINO APARTMENTS. 140 LOCFSUNART WAY, SUNNYVALE, CA., LOCATED DIRECTLY BEHIND THE CHEVRON STATION OFTEN COMPLAIN OF NOISE •EMANATING FROM CARS THAT PULL INTO THE STATION WITH THEIR STEREOS BLARING.. WE THEREFORE M OPPOSED TO HAVING THE BUSINESS OPEN 24 HOURS A DAY. WE WOULD REQUEST NORMAL BUSINESS HOURS FOR THE STORE, GAS STATION AND CARNASH. THE RESIDENTS ALSO VIEW THE TELEPHONE WHICH PRESENTLY IS LOCATED NEAR THE FENCE AS A NUISANCE. WE REQUEST THAT ANY PAY PHONE BE LOCATED WITHIN THE STORE OR IN #RONT OF THE STORE. THE RESIDENTS AS PART OF A REGULAR NEIGHBORHOOD REQUEST AND SHOULD RECEIVE PEACE AND QUIETNESS DURING NIGRTIME HOURS. SIN, ROSIE ANN ST OM, PROPERTY MANAGER 438 Cambridge Avenue ♦ Palo Alto, CA 94306 0 (415) 324-8255 ♦ (415) 324-2386 fax 0 0 CITY OF CUPER'rINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application No.: 17-U 90 (Modified) and 8-EA-93 Agenda Dale: October 11, 1993 Application: Chevron USA Products Company Property Owner: Cupertino De Oro Club Applicant: Robert 11. Lee R Associates Property Location: 11010 DeAnza Boulevard USE PERMIT to modify the square footage of an approved sales building, car wash and canopy and add one parking space. Project Data: Existing Approved Proposed Difference Building: Car Wash 0 1,120 sf. 1,149 sf. 29 sf. Food Mart 0 968 sf. 1,306 sf. 338 sf. Total 2,464 sf. 2,088 sf. 2,455 sf 367 sf. Building Coverage: 7% 6% 7% 1% Ileight: Canopy (to top of root) 22' 21' - 01' Length 109'-6" 67' -42' Mini Mart (to top of root) 16'-2 3/4" 16' -2 3/4" Site Area: 34,068 sf. (.78 acres) Parking Required: 7 spaces (1 spacc/200 sq. ft. mini mart) Proposed: 7 spaces Applicable Policy Plan: Extraordinary Use Policy General Plan Designation: Commercial/Residential Zoning: Planned General Commercial Environmental Assessment: Categorically Exempt Baclreround In 1991, the applicant received approval to demolish the existing service station and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with mini market and car wash (City Council Action Letter enclosed). The applicant is increasing the length of the car wash and expanding the food mart to include an increase in size of the utility room, walk in cooler and sales area. As a result of the extensive review of the 1991 Use Permit, conditions of approval were required on traffic, tree removal, hazardous materials and noise (City Council Action letter enclosed). The proposed modifications will not result in changes to the original findings; therefore no discussion on these issues are contained in this report. l Issiles Building Architecture: The building architecture shown is that which was approved; however the use of the blue building fascia on the food mart building overwhelms the facade. It is recommended that the blue fascia be modified with stucco and a blue fascia cap as designed on the canopy. By decreasing the intensity of color on the building it would help to blend the building, which is located at this highly visible intersection, into the surrounding uses. As shown on plan page three, Canopy Side Elevation, the "spanner" boxes will be illuminated. In addition, thce c is under canopy lighting. "Illc under canopy lighting will be sufficient to illuminate the pumping stations. It is recommended that the illuminated spanner boxes be denied as they provide excessive lighting and additional unneeded signage. 0 L !stirs of operation: The applicant is requesting permission to operate the service station and food mart on a 24- hour basis. The same request was made in the 1987 and 1990 use permit applications. On both occasions the request was denial by the City Council because of concerns about die proximity to residential uses. Staff can find no substantial changes to these findings and is therefore unable to recommend approval. The existing use permit allows operation from 6:00 A.M. to 11:00 P.M. and staff recommends no change in this condition. SjMgc: The applicant was granted an exception to the Sign Ordinance in 1991. These signs arc shown on the modified plans. A request to modify a use permit allows the original findings to be re -reviewed. It is therefore recommended that the "Chevron" logo and name located on the spanner box, canopy side elevation, be denied because the same name and logo is proposed above it on the canopy fascia. Further staff recommends that the "Food Mart" and "Car Wash" signs be reduced in length and height and both signs be placed on the front elevation of the food mart building. Recommendation: Environmental Assessment: Categorically Exempt Application 17-U-90 (Modified): Approval according to the findings and conditions specified in the attached Model Resolution. Prepared by: Michele Bjurman, Planner 11 Approved by: Robert Cowan RSC_ Non -technical enclosures: - Model Resolution - City Council Action letter of March 30, 1991 - Applicant Plan Set, consisting of (i pages - Adjacent land use map. - Applicant letters of September 19, 1993 and July 28, 1993 `mw✓���n.nnu.va" 17-U-90 (Modified) CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A USE PERMIT TO MODIFY THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF AN APPROVED SALES BUILDING, CAR WASH AND CANOPY AND ADD ONE PARKING SPACE SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described on Page I of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the application meets the following requirements: a) That the use or uses are in conformance with the General Plan of the City of Cupertino, and are not • detrimental to existing uses or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the proposed use is to be located. b) That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use. c) That the proposed use will generate a level of traffic over and above that of the capacity of the existing street system. d) That the proposed use is otherwise not detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed uses, nor injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and • That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application 17-U-90 (Modified) as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of October 11, 1993, and are incorporated by reference though fully set forth herein. SECTION II: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: 17-U-90 (Modified) Applicant: Robert H. Lee & Assoc. Property Owner: Cupertino De Oro Club Location: 11010 De Anza Boulevard USE PERMIT to modify the square footage of an approved sales building, car wash and canopy and add one parking space. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1. APPROVED CONDITIONS All Public Works conditions as outlined in the City Council Action letter of March 20, 1991, remain in full effect Resolution No. (17-U-90 (Modified) October 11, 1993 Page -2- SECTION IV• CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 2. APPROVED CONDITIONS All Community Development Department conditions of March 20, 1991, remain in full effect unless otherwise modified by the following conditions. 3. APPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation of approval is based on Sheet 1 dated revised September 17, 1993, Sheet 1.1 dated revised September 17, 1993, Sheet 2 dated revised September 17, 1993, Sheet 3 dated revised • September 16, 1993, Sheet 4 dated September 17, 1993, and Sheet 5 dated September 18, 1993. 4. APPROVED USE The subject use permit authorizes the construction and operation of a single -stall car wash, food market, and fueling stations as depicted on the exhibits listed in Condition 3 above. Equipment installed in the car wash structure shall replicate the sound generation characteristics described in the Fitzroy/Dobbs study of01/24/91 and 03/11/91. 5. SIGNAGE The Chevron logo and text located on the spanner boxes are denied. The Food Mart and Car Wash signs as shown on plan page 2, front and side elevation of the sales/carwash building is denied. A new sign combining the two, which is both shorter is letter height and total length shall be designed and approved by staff. 40 6. BUILDING MATERIALS AND COLORS The blue stucco on the front elevation (A), sales/carwash building elevation shall be redesigned with off-white stucco and a blue fascia cap as designed on the canopy. The spanner boxes shall not be illuminated. PASSED AND ADOPTED this IIth day of October, 1993, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Robert S. Cowan Donna Austin, Chairwoman Director of Community Development Cupertino Planning Commission Vic v 6" ve 0 AN ESOP COMPANY R013ERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1137 NORTH MCOOWELL BOULEVARD • PETALUMA. CALIFORNIA 94954-1469 (7O7( 765-1660 Mad—U Address P O Box 750908. Petslu,nu. CA 94975-0908 Fsx (707( 765-9906 ERIAN E —A A— — JOHN W JOHNBON September 19, 1993 Arcnt.ct JOHN B HICNB Ms. Michele Bjurman -EVEN J NATTN.R City of Cupertino A_-- Community Development CECIL R [P[Nc[R ArcM12.ct 10300 Torre Ave. JAMB H RAT Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 GrJ En On�er RE: CHEVRON USA PRODUCTS COMPANY 11010 DE ANZA BLVD. • CUPERTINO, CA SS N9-5700; RHL JOB #8937,01 USE PERMIT 17-U-90 Dear Ms. Bjurman: After reviewing the city's sign ordinance and the previously approved submittal, the client requests that they remain with the approved sign package. This is an amended submittal, not a new application. The request for a larger building does not deviate from the City Council's conditions of approval. Because the project was approved prior to the new sign ordinance, it should be exempt from complying with the new sign ordinance. The nature of a service station use inherently requires, for the benefit of the community, an amount of sign area somewhat greater than the amount appropriate for other types of uses. Sufficient signs must be displayed to be competitive with other businesses and to adequately display gas pricing information to consumers. These comments are being submitted on behalf of Chevron USA Products Company by the undersigned. Sincerely, ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Robert Picard Job Captain r-*%1— kV"%---WLdP 0 MARIETTA. CA SACRAMENTO, CA BELLEVUE. WA LA HABRA. CA DESCRIPTION OF REVISED PROPOSED ACTIVITIES July 28, 1993 RE: CHEVRON USA PRODUCTS COMPANY 11010 DE ANZA BLVD. CUPERTINO, CA SS #9-5700; RHL JOB #8937 APN #309-42-37 The scope of work for this project located at the aforementioned address was previously approved on April 8, 1991 under application ft17•U-90. The following is a brief description of work to be performed in relation to that which was already approved. A new 52'-3" x 47'-0" sales building (1306 sq. ft.) and car wash 0149 sq. ft.) is to replace the proposed 44'-9" x 46'-8" sales building (968 sq. ft.) and car wash 0 120 sq. ft.). The proposed 38' x 108'-4" canopy will be replaced by a 38' x 85' canopy. Parking spaces will increase by (1) with a total of (6) 9' x 19' and (1) 16' x 19' handicap parking stalls. The trash enclosure, underground fuel storage tanks, signs, and landscaping will remain relatively the same as the previous proposal. ROHHRT N. LHH B ABBOCIATHB. INC. P:\WP\N77.00\bfiSCAIPT t�i APARTMENT COMPLEX ED «S➢ERTf.G DE DRO «LB 1 I 1 v I CHEVRON STATION APARTMENT COMPLEX SUBJECT SITE I _ / AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX O PURETMORNE ORIVE C❑ ❑ ❑❑ z Y ❑ 0 0 aOOLOEIV ASPEN WAY CONDOMINIUM COMPLEX �n �u ■ • WAREHOUSE FACILITY AIITO TUNE-UP SHOP / / SHOPPING CENTER SHOPPING Ca R — _ \\\\\\\ � ROBERT H. LEH 6 ASSOCIATES OpI Chevmn U.SA Inc. ""."°w...sn VICINITY MAP iTow NORTH De ANZA uvD R[11SI.x9 CU►ERTINO, CA. SCRI.E.RIG}- CM. DR-A V-4, CH. RPP. O SSA 6700 JO # 82 6 4 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET so City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 252-4505 Fax 252-0753 Please deliver the following pages to: 1A 1( 1 . . . . . . . . ... From: NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER PAGE): Bob Cowan X218 Vera Gil X251 Ciddy Wordell X236 Colin Jung X257 Ceilia Barron X259 Yvonne Kelley X253 Michele Bjurman X277 Tom Robillard X332 Pain Eggen X297 FITZROY/DOBBS Consultants In Architectural Acoustics and Noise Control B.D. DOBBS Acoustical Society of America N.C.A.C. September 14, 1993 Robert Picard Robert H. Lee & Associates 1137 North McDowell Blvd. Petaluma, CA 94954-1469 Re: Car Wash Building -- Chevron Service Station 9-5700 Homestead & Saratoga -Sunnyvale Rds. Cupertino, California Dear Mr. Picard: It is our understanding that the referenced car wash building as now proposed is 52-53 feet in length, which is some 5 feet longer than was previously considered and approved by Cupertino. Further, Cupertino has requested an updated opinion as to what affect the added length will have on the acoustical issues. We have reviewed our file on this project and find that building length (within reasonable limits) is not material to compliance with noise requirements no long as the other noise control features are in place, i.e., the sound wall and the wing walls. The increased building length is not detrimental to the noise control process and is approvable from the acoustical viewpoint. Very truly yours, �01b�' B. D. Dobbs BDD:md 1 1 27-L Pamaron Way, Novato, CA 94949 • (415) 883-8701 �- ROY/DOBBS Consultants In Architectural Acoustics and Noise Control B.D. DOBBS A cou•1.cal soNur of ^T-dh[A N.C.A.C. January 24, 1991 Michael Manos Chevron USA, Inc. 2400 Camino Ramon San Ramon, CA 94sa3 Re: Chevron Service Station 9-5700 (Canvash) 4P Cupertino, California Dear Mr. I•lanos: We have reviewed the revised Service Station layout which places the car•:ash parallel to and some 12 feet from the north property line. This location offers some advantages related to orientation and geometric relationship with sound walls. Our previous reports, dated July 12, 1990 and October 10, 1990, give background irforratien and establish that daytime traffic noise is typically around 57 Leq at the second floor apartment windows nearest the Service Station site toward the rear of the front building. In the evening, 9 to 11 p.m., it is aroand 54 Leq. Noise toward the front of the apartment building toward Saratoga -Sunnyvale as Road would be higher, at that aspect v.-as not considered in the calculations. Caniash noise, air portion, e,-anating from the exit opening would t•e E2.5 Leq at the second floor apartment windc,.. For a wash and dry cycle, the ')wise level would be at S8.5 Leq. Additional noise reduction is reeds; at each end of the cangash. Thi; can be accomplished in either of two ways. The first is to build a sound %•)all on the property line which would extend Tro` m 4 f et in front et} LOS-1 to 3 feet beyond LOS-2. (LOS - line of sight) It is shown on attached', Exhibit 2 as "A" and in section on the upper portion of Exhibit 1. 27-L Pamaror. Way, Novato, CA 94949 • (41 S) 383-8,-01 1 �. N3nos Chevron tSA, inc, Chevron Service Station 4-5700 (Cznwzsh) Jan. 24, 1990 With the carwash opening height at 7 feet, Sound hall "A" should be 11.5 feet high, n.easured from grade on the ad;oining property. If the carwash opening is at 9 feet, then Sound Wall "A" would need to be raised to at least 12.5 feet in height. The second approach is to extend the wall of the can -.ash which is parallel — to tn perty line so:.;e 6 feet, ±, to ti.e front (toward the street) and 15 feet, f. to the rear -- as shoi,n by :walls "B" and "C" on Exhibit 2. At each end the -wall should extend at least 2 feet beyond the pertinent LOS. The extended walls should extend to a height of at least 10.5 feat above the carwash floor. Either of the :iethods will reduce carwash noise at adjacent second floor apartments to well bellow the tra:fic noise levels d to within permissible noise linits. Our reco.-=endation, however, is t*.—f cond approach. Kali height is directly related to building structure and floor elevation. lfovexent of the building is less critical -- even up to several feet. (If sound wall is on property line, independent of building, any significant building movement would require a review.) For the first method any fence en the re-ainder of the property line, and for the second method, any fence on the entire property line has no acoustical requirements; but a solid fence, e.g., a 2x wood fence, of reasonable height would be useful and beneficial to the adjacent apartment complex. Note that in either case the precise wall location and length will be determined and verified when carwash is located in relation to the side property line and the nearest apartment building. Please contact us if you have reed of further information. very truully� yours, 9. 0. Dobbs BOD:md Attachments lic 46.. C-�LLI — n el SI1RATOGA-SUNNYVALE ROAD '�••••' T A. «-91 5CA LE. l'- 30' N0/v*,,:fT'l!AD' OA SCACk-l*e19 2.5't .60 v to, I? , 1, WA"A- Lb t - i Nj O .yam N YVA LJ5 SA i? A TO& A IO/OB/03 15:36' rmish-207d5 - CITY CUi'SRTINO,, sas ......ACTIVITY............REPORT0mR*T* ... .ts sstsssststtssss.tstsssssst. TRANSMISSION OH TX/RX NO. 5822 CONNECTION TEL 7307655 CONNECTION ID START TIME 10/06 13:53 USAGE TIME 02*43 PACES 8 RESULT OK • C� J / D// I lq,3 WA *jb,kr�td Vv p WIT re — bio M to U, - 1- 4 co,Ao-V CA- c,,a,t+ tyfjiauru-�� J-ty-�- 2-�-j kvg - OlL c Ark � - pjG IR- 0 Actions for Planning Commission Meeting of October 11, 1993 Page-2- Apnlication Application 17-U-90 (Modred), Robert H. Lee & Associates, Chevron USA Products Company, 11010 De Anza Boulevard. Description Use Permit to modify the square footage of an approved sales building, car wash and canopy and add one parking space. Ac inn The Planning Commission approved the Use Permit on a 5-0 vote. Approval is effective October 11, 1993. The fourteen calendar day appeal %ill cxpirc on October 25, 1993. Enclosures: Resolution No. 4477 City Council Action Letter of March 30, 1991 Applicant Plan Set, consisting of 6 pages j Adjacent Land Use Map Applicant Letters of September 19, 1993 and July 28, 1993 g-mMmamdl0.11.93 0 Chevron August 31, 1993 Chman U.S.A. Products company 2410 CaminoRamon San Ramon, CA 94583 Marketing Department ftm 510 e42 9500 Self -Directed Program Advisor Santa Clara Valley Water District 5750 Almaden Expressway San Jose, CA 95118-3686 Re: Chevron Service Station #9.5700 (Self -Directed Site) 11010 North Do Anza Boulevard . Cupertino, California Dear Program Advisor, This correspondence is in response to a letter, dated June 1. 1993, to Mr. Jeff Zindel of Chevron. A copy of the letter is attached for your reference. That letter requests investigation and cleanup of subsurface conditions beneath the subject site. As per all the attached documentation, Chevron has no indication of inpaet to the subsurface. Consequently, Chevron will decline to conduct any investigation on the subject site at this time. I declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained in the attached data are true and correct, and that any recommended actions are appropriate under the current circumstances, to the best of my knowledge. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (510) 842-8953. • Sincerely, -?ANi i'cal.— Robert Foss Environmental Engineer Attachments cc:: %Mr. Gordon Simpkinson, Central Fire Protection District, 1400 Winchester Blvd., Los Gatos, CA 95030-1818 Mr- John West, SCVWD Coordinator, RVdQCB, 2101 Webster ST, Suite M. Oakland, CA 94612 File(MAC 9-5700R02) ,:"'a3 '93j.M.1,% Santa Clara Valley Water District 5150 At1:ADEN EXPRESSWAY SAN JOSE, CA 95118.3666 IREPMONE NJBi 265.2600 EACSIMI.E (458)266 0271 AN UPIOANI ACfV)N MOM June 1, 1993 40 Mr. Jeff Zindel Chevron USA P.O, BOX 5004 San Ramon, CA 94583 Dear Mr. Zlndel: Subject: Chevron 9-5700, 11010 Forth De Atua Boulevard, Cupertino, CA This notifies you that Santa Clara Valley Water District (District) records indicate that a spill or leak of gasoline, *cl, or waste oil has contaminated soil and/or groundwater underlying the subject site and that you have been Identified as a responsible party. Pursuant to the California Water Code, polluted soil and groundwater shall be cleared up to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board). The Regional Board is the state agency responsible for enforcing the California Water • Code to protect beneficial uses of both surface and groundwater. Due to the large numbers of subsurface fuel leak cases being reported, the Regional Board has been unable to provide detailed regulatory oversight on these cases. A program has been developed between the Regional Board and the District where the District provides oversight on fuel leak cues and the Regional Board provides enforcement and case closure. Therefore, in order to protect groundwater quality, we request that you proceed with investigation and cleanup at the subject site without delay. The investigation and cleanup of polluted soils and groundwater will generally follow the steps listed in the enclosed summary which is excerpted from the District's guidelines entitled, "Investigation and Remediation at Fuel Leak Sites Guidelines for Investigation and Technical Report Preparation," dated March 1989. These guidelines describe the steps for investigation and cleanup (remediation) that are necessary to resolve this matter and are available to you by calling the District's Self -Directed Case Advisor. Once the Preliminary Site, Assessment phase has been completed, you may qualify for the District's Conditional Case. Closure Program; a guidance document is enclosed for your information. These documents have been sent to consultants known to work in Santa Clara County. Please conduct an investigation to delineate the extent of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in soil and groundwater at the site. You are requested to submit a technical report documenting the activities and findings of the investigation by September 3. 1993. This request is made pursuant to the Regional Board's authority under Section 13267 of the California Water Code. Mr. Jeff Zindel June 1, 1993 Copies of ail future reports, letters, etc., should be submitted to the Santa Clara Valley Water District (Attention: Self -Directed Program), the Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the local fire department or agency which has jurisdiction over chemical storage on your site. The contacts and addresses are provided below: Mr. John West Air. Gordon Simpkinson Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Fire Protection District 2101 Webster Street, Suite 500 14700 Winchester Boulevard Oakland, CA 94612 Los Gatos, CA 95030-1819 Until you receive further notice, your case is considered to be self -directed. Although we will not be providing you with detailed review and comments on your investigation and cleanup, you may contact the Self -Directed Case Advisor for general guidance and clarification. Please be advised that the District • will routinely review selceted self -directed cases to determine whether or not Investigation or cleanup is being pursued In a timely manner. At that time, we may consider providing direct oversight or recommending that enforcement action be taken by the Regional Board or other appropriate agency including the County District Attorney if work is not being done in an appropriate time frame. We consider an appropriate time frame to be 10 weeks to do the field work and write and submit an implementation report which contains the results of the field work. Please check with your consultants to determine whether or not they have the District's guidelines. If you or your consultants have any Questions, please call the Camden Office, (408) 927.0710, extension 2627, and ask for the Self -Directed Case Advisor or write to the Self -Directed Case Program at the District's address. Sincerely, ,Q Fuel teaks Section Groundwater Protection Division Enclosure cc: Mr. John West Mr. Gordon Simpkinson Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Fire Protection District 2101 Webster Street, Suite 500 14700 Winchester Boulevard Oakland. CA 94612 Los Gatos, CA 95030-1819 01 .t�T ar SANTA CLARA COUNTY G CENTRAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT '. 14700 WINCHESTER BOULEVARD � �' u LOS GATOS, CA 95030.1918 SEnV �E SINCE :947 008) 378 4010 Fax (408) 378 934i INSPECTION NOTICE ❑ Annual • Cycle ❑ Flainspeetion ❑ construction Page-/ of AOC14e3 —! Dd ArJ-aA %gL Oco. Type: Date 2-23-93 Occcpancy Ctia(/�,�., Serv;c• S�fbti Ou, Load: Pnane Marno To: l5� rw(t n 'Rti on From: GDI C/o n 4 /f7.M-�. ]rem l.J a.r1�e ✓a l -- S.7 c I Sw sT %a.-k H4CJ et0 ko(p r MorderaRt COrn�r.'an No .ev'c eld-d O ,n C) vee- 4 rl, '5"';/ /eOkeap 0.".1 _rmeltro/ Qr..s. .5 t- , p (e 7LC A e q be /C�Lj f i it 6i_ d ©ems >n.r'!I.- corRpo.s.4cJ a .'6"fe. 'Tc,..A senF v.- o/c*- M,".Cts to L�nG�nr ?r,j,k �,'cer,qp IV Ve-h -e _rAO 0 be rcko,o d 77a.—c i s a /ram a -. vn 4C1K fo.; raJ Q,x 7,?.6 veelI. e. TA; _r i 4 s/,a It ix 'Er4 a ""I V r+'t} I -{, 4t^ 0'� b`�r.0i . GQ. It irve. G h M OVia:e4 i 0,A 0,CfJ/h-7b I t'4•tk1 7''--4 Gt' cyb / Ob^ V l Palereon 1/2710 (Z" ^d V'—U-ir•ii iii. h' matt �ktr•11 s'a 'a+•t•vr- - - - - 102 Marketing Faciiitin Sustlscied, Division IF Underground. Product 19kgiiQ.ktis *&,', 1. Confirmation of Telephone Report 110 Be Voi!ed a h0 W-On 5 Days of Phone 8epertl XC - Leak - ! S 1 Onison gnat. Cretral h:�ttyNo. 57011 -. �_ Address 11010 N. De An -.a Blvd GtytStete Cupertino, CA 1 Ccmpans Ropiesenutne rfind ri&ysylt _ T n A / DMA I 3 Inhaurg CAcumsien:es. O luk Dueaor ❑ Ilgh I.1117 O Oukr Fjponed lets ❑ Ylpar in leek O tau of ova; o,. • • Q 0:smed Product or Va)o:s m Grou,id. Bettments, Utuutt, tic IEapllin 31 Utter ligami f ;rt Iv fauk 'fret _ 4 RtpoaedBy Gettler-Ryan Inc. Tnit Contractor D11e II. Fiadlnoo Repen Ito Be Model to NO Within 14 Days of Phone ReperL and &her PUkminori lnvaUgeuvt S Was a leak Conlameds !Xs Yet O No Dolt • t Conlemil-on Piocedu+t m Twin; (Typo ¢11at Petro Tite _ O Costntd teak tExpia.n thumped Rate of tsuk it the Tome of Cenfpmaticn; Gelhir t 1 System One let leak Souse- M Tank O hoduc-t line O Vent Eire O vapo- Return line 0 fitting ❑ Other IEtptem Ibl teak" Equipment Typo Tank O Steel ❑ Fiberglass ospmp 0 unt ❑ Filling O Sttel O Fiberotats it- Dots System Neva a Submervblt Pump? M yes ❑ No Did Slitem Noe lee► Olathe', Idl Plodutltst Regular . ; lei Audit Patod From 1-85 To 8- ill Estimaud lots horn Audit, Total Gal 129 (Ca in) Igl Corrrtire Anion Tank Pign.01d Out ill. Uedwsnuei[ Can'rmlootioo I&ratioatbn • ••^�-� B Was or WA investigation Wets be Drilled? O Yea ❑ No S. Number of Wets Orilled of the Time of Thu Report? None 1 10 Was Produci 05urvad in Eitza4tionlil? O Yet ED No Warren c •t{ra . ' tat °: - 1 11 Was fiat NoUt found an The Water TOO O Yes 3 No Resistivity 1 1 •M1, 19 Has Product Wgreted ON Site? Q Yet M No P H > •>~ • ,r _ ' ty, Ronatko TANK TEST lu]TLATrn RX Pot ITINP (•ITY A¢ IrnuT nt L i,•sr a- MATL'fITAl. 2ROtILAM. NO 1PaY YAS SSIeaElTL•1, 1,1AT011 TO TEST. v' Prepared By b. M Qhuiar Titk `fTsa nfflr. Aeslrs+silt Urtr LEAK/SPILL INCIDENT UPDATE Division: hest Central HQ1D0t 310 (c L Incident Date: 8-15-85 Div, ID dt Close Date: � Z- Ljs� Leak - On Leak - Off Spill Type of Facility: Service Station 5700 Products Regular Gasoline Name h Address: Company Operated Estimated Gallons Lost: -0- H 5700 - 11010 N. DeAnta Blvd. Estimated Gallons Recovered Cupertino, CA This Month: To Dates. Description: Leak discovered in regular tank during routine tank testing required by local ordinance. Tank is fiberglass, installed in 1976. Subse- quent 90 day audit showed 129 gallon gain. Tank ends exposed. No contamination excountered. Tank pumped out and locked. CURRENT STATUS :4atet August 198S Statboat Tank manufacturer has been contacted and is expected to enter and examine tank early in September. • September 1985 - Tank was relined by manufacturer - Although no defects were found. Ninety day audit - did not indicate any loss, Evacuations around tank did not reveal any contamination. Monitoring wells to be continued. October 1985 - Investigate boring to be installed 11-S-8S. Awaiting results, November 1985 - No product was observed in investagative boring. Recommended closing. VK2-120 LYHI:)��•�•� 1 1 VIEW "=mIA°m*m/nm,VGRECORD (RECORDED mr`'"x COMPAVY LO".^* .. "»' TIME --.—'.--_----------_---------`'-------------'--_--'----------.-------_—'�---_—'_—. .. . "^' U | ^ | ���^'�| | [ | | | | ( | | �~~^^^~~~~~^—~~^~ ............���. .'�..... . . .. .. .'�.'. ...... .......'..'.............. { *.L WK. w2 w* °^ LAC [v^` `=z =o w* UK | UK wx, "u "m \ Vic, | '~^~'~~''^^^'`~'^^^'^^^^'~~~~^^~^~^~^^^^~—~~^..~^~^~~~^..~~~~^~.~^^^'.. .~..^~^^^^~^~~^~~^^~~~~^^^~^~^^^~..~~~~|^—^^�~| | �L |( | | | ')�� | l | 7 | |— —U—'-1---1---1' —|'---f---1----1 |---1----|---'—�--^—|---j'---1 (---U—'--|----|----1—'--1----1—'—'-1'�---|'----' ---'—|'----�----1----'l----|--'—|--'—| |' --1�----f''--|'---'|'----('----f----\----1----'�'�--f''--- '—'--' ---1---' ----|----| \--''D----1---|----'i---'�'—'--f---'[----' ----'�---'—|----|-----|'--'—'|—''--/----|----� (---1|----|----1----1'---1----|-----1----�----'|'---'|----'|----' ----|---1'---�'---1 |---U----|--'-1'---1'—'--1----|----'<—'---/-----1'----�----f---1----(---1---�—'--| it / 1---||----|---1'�---('--'—|----f--'-1—'---'��---'—�'---|----' —'----L---1---'�----�----| |---'r(----|----1—'--1----'l—'--f----|—'--1'—'--1----1----'i----1''---|---i--''—)'--'—/ |�--1|---/--'-1--'--|--'—/—'--+--'—�----'|'----'----'|----' ---'—|----+---�---'�--'--| ( i. ' --'--' '—'--- '---''--'— ----- ---'/--'—'r----�—'''--| �---d'---'|----|'—'--'�----|—'---�-----|—'----�-----''----|----''--'--'-----�—'--1—'---'{-----| COWAN. =LA`rw u;, "ttr C"uAXCEmmnmwxR(CMO U� �� Joe ,"ME -'_--_-.--------.------'--.-`'_------------'------------_-_'-_---.-_---_-.. | ............... _._._ _\�� ���________|________1^__..___..| |.`=u,^|z,,,_,,~^|,,,,,,^,,~,,_|,,.,~~,,�=�5�|~,~~,,| ~~,,�,~_�,,�~,~,,_�����,|~~,^,,^,|~,,,,,,,|,,,,,~|,,,,^,~,| | =^` *" / w ' =* =° m , | w , w2 "* w^ 1.95 | tK ' `=x °o ~^ | *", � \^^-^^`-~'^-^^`^^^'`^~~~^^^^'^^`^~^~~`^^^^^~~^~~~^^^. .~^. .~~^~~~^^~^~~^^^^^'~^^`^^~^~^~^^~^^^^^~^^^^~^^^^^^^^^^``^`~~|^'-^^^^'i ( U | too |'1'l|'--'|'-|---+--- ---'-|-��-'|----' ---' ---'|----|-���-|---' ---|--- '--i |---U---f'---|---f---'<--'--\-'--�--'--|----' '--1'---f-'--\--'--F-'-1--'-|---| |---||''--1'--'1-'--|'---|'----|---1----1----'�---|'-'-'|----|'--1--'f-'-1--1 |---U----|---�----\----|---f-'--|'---- ---' --''�'---�----�---'1--'-|--...-|---| \---|)----|'-'--|----'}'----\--'--�----!'----|--'--|-'--f------'1'---\--'f---|---| \---U---'---)----|'----1----'|---'8'--'-|----'�---1'---|----1`--'1-'-1--''1'--'1 |---U---|'-''f--'-i'---|----'|----|-----|'---' --'-;----'-'---\`---|-'--|---�|---| |- --U---|---f--''x----|---''|---' -----|----|----�`-------�----|--'-|--~� ----| l---|�----\---'f---'|'----|--'--l----\-----F----|---'�'----|----(---/'---|---1---| |---U---|--'-i'---�---'|---1--'-|----'-~--f-'—�'--'-1-----l`-'-|-''-1---1---/ |''-U---\'---�---'1----|----+-'-'|--'--'|----1-'---�----|----1'---\-'---|---f--'1 ` (� UEERLY COMPLIANCE PIDIl10RIN6 RCCORD COMPANY C Y� TC J P tlY� U;S 1•I �_ J � t\�1 (RECOROCD IN P►N't) Joe 0 •� aQa .a 1 LOCAL ION t I4 (1I N, JJ n.,�z-ys1 W •1+i �ts..CL DAZE CIIT �'� 4 rt . n a - _ i1ME ...................._.._.._,.........------------- ------................................................................ ....._.................................. Naltx II �C,tppe/ I NOVEAtBER I bCC�Hdc2 ! ...............................................•....--...--..........................•.----..._...--.............................................................. DAIS 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 r_ I I I I I2,,il,. I I I I .._. .... ............................ 1.................................... .... ........................... ......n............... .........-......................... I UCLL UK I UK 2 1x1 UK4 UK S 1 UK 1 LK 2 U" U4 4 UK S 1 UK L uK 2 URS UK4 I K S ............................. . . ................ ................................................................................................... I ------- 1 /:25 i I I 1 /aa I 1 1 1 ►---.....-II.........I......_..1.........I._....._.I.._..._..I...--•--•I•--•----•1•-•--.._.1.........1....._...1.._..__._I..._...._I.........I.....__..1......_..I I...... _.-I I-........l......._.1......---I.._......I.....--•-1-....._..I..�.._....I...._..--►---__....I.........I.__..---.l....-..._I.._.._...1.........1........•I I II I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I._.......11---..._..I......_..i..__....-1••------•I •---...._ I.._....--I...--•-•-I--...----1---...._.I._......-I•-----...I.........1....._...1....._...I..-•--•--► I..._.....It......_..f._....._.I....._...I.......-• 1--.......I...._.---1-----•---I•-•---...1........-1•--......I..----...I........_I.......__I...:...-•I•-•----•-1 I.... -•---I I•--..._..1_....---.1........-i•----....I----.....I.....,...I.........I.--•-----I-----••--I-•--•--..I.........I..._.....1--..._...I......._.I....._...I I••---••--II--...._..I_...... _.I.._......1..:..----1•---.....1......--•1•----••-•I--•----..1..----...I..._,.-••I••------.I.........I......_..1...-•---•I----.._..i I...._....II---....--1•--......1..:.....-I-......_.�..._..--•I•--•-----I......_..i-••------I....._...I.........I.._..---.I.........I._....... i......_..1...._....I I II 1 I I I I I 1 t 1 I I I I I I I.._......I I........_I......_..I..._...,.l...---•-•I----..._.1...._....I.........I_...._...I.._.._...I._.......I.........I._.......t._.._._..I....----_1.........1 I II i i f I 1 I i I I I I t I I 1 1.........II....-.---1---._....I.........I....._.-•I------...l.........I......_..1.....----I•------..I.........I.........I--.......I.........I......_..i.........1 1.........II.._......I.----••--I-......._I....._...I...._....I.......--I.........I......_..I.........I.....--•-1......__.I._...._..I.........I..._.....i.........1 f II I I l I I I I l I I i� I 1 I I I........-II---......1.........1....__...I...._..-•I•-----•-.I._.......I.._..._..i...__....I.....---• 1.-...._._I.......--1--••---..I._.......1......._. i...._....1 WEKLY CO WLINICE MNII(LRING RtOM e r ^� «E[OYOEO IN ►PM's) COIIPAlIY O Q clr� �J 7L_/ `"1� JI�iy JOB I D L0G1IION t t [j t O 11i 27o..�-z... % r'�'�1•i s.l� OAIE L4 cl lr C.,n Q n •• a - _ TIME -------------- ................ ......------- .......... ..._...-------•--•----...........-------••-•---•---..................----..........---._..._............... .........................7-- ••-•-••....---........................................T.... { o�u II I i I�.•p:�.r�l I 1 I I =?.t.:tl I I �_�.:�1• I I I .............................. ............ ................... ,..,......... ............. ...... ................... ....... ............ ...... ............... ...... ... ! YFLL IX I vx 7 uK! Wr. LK i ( 4K I uK 2 Uri WK( tw S 1 NK I wr 7 WKS WIM I uK S y 1..................... ......................... 3.................................... ,.._.............................. ....... ...................... ...1......., f 1 II I 1 1 -4 I I I I I $p I I It I I 1 f I I t 1 l i I i I I I 1....-.._.11 •---••-._ I..._.....1._.......1...._._..I..-----•-I-----•---I•--......I----•---• y---•-•---1•-----•--y--....._.I....._...1._.......I...._....1....__...I I ll I f I 1 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I......_..II._....._.1.........I....__...,--•-----.1.._.._.._(....-•---y.__..._..I.._......I..--•---•1•--•-----y•-•-._...I._._.....I........-I•-•--•--.1.....-...I I_....----II•.....__.1.........1......-••1••----...I_...__..-I---...__.I..__._...I......_._I......._.1......._.I....-----I---......I...................1--.......1 I 11 I I I I I I I S I I I I I I I I._....._.11......---I••--•---.I..._..-•-1...._....I.-----•-• I ••-•----.I_........I_......._ I-------------------y-••-----.I_._......1.........1.....---•{-•-------I 1 II I I f I I 1 I I I l I I I I I I_..... 11........-I I.......... I--------- :--------- 1•-------.......... t--------- I--------- I--------- I--------- 1......... t--------- i--------- I•-•------, I 11 ! I I I I l I l l I I I I I I I.........11.........1........-1••-----..I...................I...._....I.__......I.._._..--y--••----.1._.......I.........1.........1.........1..__.....I--.......1 I II I I l I l I i I I I 1 1 I I I I...... ---I I•--._._..I.._..._..I.........f...................I----.....I....--•--I.........I.........I........_I...._....i--.......I......-•-I----•----I•--...._.I I II I I I l I I 1 ! I t I 1 I 1 I i.-....---yl----.....1.........1.........1....__...I..---....I._...-•--1........-I•---.....i_...-•--•(•--•-•---1..--••-•-(---......I...---...1---......1......---1 I It Unny tt1NlIARCE MOK11O4100 RECORD (RECORDED 1K rpm•%) cutipAwr IOW10W +Ll (V N gA�ZyJ ��•1•. 1•• Fs. 7� ion a O11EE 11ME ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 11041 K 11 1 /Lj I ` I ........................................................................ ^ ...........-_......-._...........•............ .. ................. I OA1E 11 ly_q_gLI I I I I s-4-4n- I ! I I I 1 I .................................................... ................................ .,............................................. I.............................. Ufa 1K 1 UK 2 UK UKl UK S I UK 1 UK 2 Uri UX4 UK S I 1x 1 UK 2 UK7 U[c ! UK S 1 1......_..............................................................................................................................................1.......1 too I I (• •1 I._...e.--11...---•--I-..._....I.........I..---•---I--•--•---1-..._....I.._....--1---•----• 1•------..1..--••--• I•---.....I..._.....I....._...I.--•-----I-._......I t 11 I 1 l 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I_....._. _ I I.........I........-I•-•------I.........I......_..I.......-•1--=•--•--I-..._....1....__...I..._.....I.........1--....._. i.........1........_ I.........I 1.........11........_I.........I....._...I......_..I.._......I ► I 1 I........ -I I.........I.......... I......... I......... I I.........Il....__...1..._....-1-.....-..I.•----...I.......-.I••-•••-••1•-•-•----I•--•--•--I......--•t••-•-•--•1---••••-.1_.._.....I...•---••I.-...-•-•I•--......1 I II I I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 ! 1 1 I I I I.....---il.........1._..---..1._...---.I......._.1.._...._.1.........I--.....--I•---•-_--i-•-----•-t-•--.....1---.._...I._.......1.........1.__.....-{•---....•i ! II I 1 I l I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I --......-tl••-._.._.I_........I.........1.._...._.I......._.1.........1..._....-I•--...._.1.._.._...i...._._..I--.......I.........I.........I.........1_........I I If !-........11.........I.........I........_I...._..-•;--•---...I._.......I......._.I...__...-1-......--I.........I.----....1......._.I.........I.--•--•--i-•-•---••I I 11 I I I 1 I t I 1 1 1 1 I I I 1 _.......11.........I.._......I..._.....i._._.....I.........(.........1.......... I--------- I......... I--------- I......... I......... 1......... 1......... .........I I II I I I i 1 I I I I 1 i 1 1 I I !........II.........1.._......1......_..I..._.....I....__...I....... 1 I..... 1... I--•--•••-I•----....i..._.....i.........1.........1......... 1 11 1 I t I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 11....._.._I.._......I....._...I.........I....._...I....__...I......__.I...... 1 - I(..._.__..I._._.....I....._...I._.......I..........1 J 1% WEM,mHPL*gCE~IMIpmwoIIECORD 'RcCaUDm/""~'"` JOB "v^`m^ '' u^ =" ct.` ta `ve —.---.----.--.—_---.--..--..-------'-------_—_'---—_------.-------.-------'---. Ja �e. | | ---_--------_'�......................................... —_—'............................................................................ . DAu U }| | | 1 | | |»6 | | | | ~^~~~``^~`^^^'^^^^``'~~~~^^`~~~^^~~~~~~~~^^^^^~~~^~^~~^^~^^~~~~~``~~~~~..~^~~~~^'''^^~~~~^~'^^^`^^^~ \ wu UK ` = 2 "o V* mv | °" ` W 2 "3 m* "*5 | w / "" ' wo p^ ^ | ^`^^^^'~~~^^^^—^~~~~^~~~^^^^~~~^~^^^~^^~~^^^^~^~^~~~~^~~^^^^^~^^~~~^^~~~^~'~~~^^~^^^^^~~^~~^~^|^~~~�^| ,—�L'—||'--'1'=—|—'--|---f----|---1'---'—'--|'---|'---|--''—|'--'1----|--'-1----| |---1|—'--|--'—f—'--|----f''---|----|'---|'---\----\--'f---1--'—|'---|--'—|'---| \—''—U'--'1---+---|----�----+—'--|----|----1'----|'---|----|---1'---|—'--''--'1 |---1|—'—'f—'—f---|—'—'1—'---|----|--'--|'--'-1----f—'-1----|----i—'—�-1--`—'\---� \---'�(—'--|---+--''1----|—'--f'---�----|---'1----1----1'---1----}----\--'—|---| |---1|---|---1--''1---|----f'--1----(----|----'�----|----'|---1'--'1----'|---| \---U---1----1—'--f----|----|---f''--'1—'---|--'--|'--'—|--'--|----�'--'—|--'—|---| | || | | | | \ | | | | | | | \ ( | |---'x—'--�--'--|—'-1'--'—f---'(----|'---f----|—'---|---'—|----|----|---1—'—'1'---1 |--'—U----1---1---1---f—'--+---\----f----�----f'---|--'--|'---1----'|--'—'l'—'--� |---'U—'--|---1—'--'|---(-----\—'—'f---+----|'--'1'--'—'|--'--|----|---1----'|'---| |--'—\i---1---1—�'--|......... |......... ......... '--'�----'�—'---|----'|--'--|---'—|---'1----|'—^'—| 4EEYLY COMPLIANCE IIO111IORINC REtomD US I1?C71C �1��� IRECOARLR IY MM•s► mNPwrSh�JP _ ja R _ 5`ii O— A .D j IOC.IIWI i 1 p I O 11IJ 2�0.�.—�._. / /��►•s•` a•� DATE _ /O —r-,Z` - I Clrr Gy. /) V _T` n1J TIME 1T•3o p"N. ......................................................................................................................... NO... � ...._ .... I I...1....111.i....................................................M......................................................................................... ( uLLI uc I uc 2 Lacs ucc It s I uC I %K 2 ucs Llcc sic s I UK I uc 2 uci Yrct I WK s I I ......... ............... ...................................................................... .................... ............................... ..... 1......... I -----•--•11--. _....I....t._......-,•--......I_.._.....t.------••I......_..I._.......I....--•--I.-......-I.........I.........I.........I....._...I••-----••I I.........I I.._.....-I----.....i.........I..--•••••1---••-••-I...------(---...---I----•-•--i-----._..I....-..............I_.._...._I.........t.........I.....---•! I..._.....II..._.....I........-(-----•--• I•------..I...._.._.I..._._...I._._.....I..-------I.__...._.I....-----I--•------I•---...._ I...._... -I•• -......I........ -I I._...._..il.........I_........I._.._....I._...--•-I--------.I..._._...I.--•--..•I..--•--•-I.._......I._._...._ I_...-----I-........I.........I._.......I...._....I ......... It ......... I ......... I --------- I ......... I --------- I --------- I ......... I ......... I ......... i......... I ......... I ......... I ......... I --------- I ......... I I II t 1 I I I t l I I I I I I 1 I (.........tl_....-•--I----.....I.........I.........I.....---.I......_..I_.......-i-•-----•- I-•-•-•--• I• -•--•---I-......._ I......._.I....._...I......--• I.. -•-•---I I......... It --------- 1----- ....I ......... I --------- ---------- I ......... I ......... I --------- I --------- I ......... I ......... I ......... I ......... I ......... I ......... I I..__.....It......... 1--------- I --------- I ......... I ......... I ......... I ......... I --------- I --------- I ......... I ......... I ......... I --------- I ......... I ......... I I ll 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I i I I 1 ► I I__.......II.........I........-i•--......I.....---.I....._...I_........I.....----I-........I......_..I.........I..---....I.........I.........I._....._.t.........1 1.........11...._....I.........I.........I...-•--•-I....._...I......._.i.........1.._..._.. I.........I.........I......_..I......_..I.........1--......_I.........I I_........I I _........I....... -.I _........I....---•• 1---......t---._....f.._......I........_I.........I.........I......_..I._.......I.........I.-----••-I......---I WEIKI.,CC14PLIANCE MONxA"G ACCORD ( �h uxu/= *"' =,, R 've ---'----'--'----'------'----''----'-'-------------'-------'--'-' | U -\� | | -"-----���'-----------.- __.____._____�� _______.| [�J:�| ' ..-.-'~~'..~~..^...^....~~.'~.~~~~~^....~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~....~~~~..~~.~~.~~..~~.~~..~~.~~~.~^.~'~.~~...~~~~.. -, | WELt = ` = 2 WC` *^ ~' | w / ""2 °w "* UK^ 1 VK ` Lit w` =" | =, | }^`~'^^`~^~~^^^^'^^^~^~^^~~^~^~~~^^^^~~~~`^~~^^~~^~^~~~-~..~^'~-~~^~~-^^'^~~~~^~~~~^~^~~^`^^~~^~^^~~~~|^^^~~~� | \. u > |-)';- | | | -4,---1 | | | | 15- | | 1 / 1 |-�... |{......... |.... ... -..... ......... |......... ......... ......... |......... ......... |......... ......... ......... |........ |---|---| �---U---+-'-|-''-1'----|--'-1'--'1'-'-|---1---1-'-1---|---\---\---!-'-1 |-' -U'--'1---�---|'--'f- '-|---f--'|---1---|---\---|---|---|--'1---| \--'-||'--'1---|-'--|---'f-'--|---f---1-'---i'--'1---|'--''Y---\--'1--'`1---'j |---A---|-'-'\---|---\---\---\---|---1--'-�'-'-\--'|-'-1---|---|--'-} |--'-U---1---|-'--|---|'---|---|---f----i---'1---|---1--'-'�---|---|'---\ 1---U---|---i---f-'--|---1--'f---1'----|'--''i'-'-|'--'1---|---i---\---i } �-'-||'--'1---|---f--'1---|---|---\-'`-('-'-|�--1---|---|---|---|---| �---n'--'1---\---|----|-'--\---\---|--'-|'--'�|---|---|---|---|---�---| |--�'N----|---1'---|''--\-'--(---|---|'--'|-'—�---1---1---�---!---|---| �-'--U---\---!---|'--1---|---|---'1'--1--'-|'--|'---|-'-1---|---|-'-'1 jt CUPERTINO - 11010 H Di AB2A BLVD/HOXESTBAD =.F JOB 52, CHEVR0N USA 5700 DATB YELL DTH LTV HT BAILED PPH LEL FYCL DTB ERP C.ELF 08-Apr-91 V1 10 Sx 10-Y.ey-91 Yl DN 60 SI( 14-Jnn-91 V1 DN 40 RA 07/10/91 ryen Inc. pt51783-7500 J9++ud +n1 ++�u++Tcnbl unir+clut PAGE i Il • CHEVRON USA 5700 CUPERTINO - 11010 N DE ANZA BLVD/HOMESTEAD JOB 5202 DATE YELL DTH DTV HT BAILED PPN LEL FVCL DTB EVP C-ELEV ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15-Jan-91 V1 D/V 175 RA 15-Feb-91 VI D/V 100 RA 08-Mar-91 V1 D/V 50 Sx 7 gainer — ryen Ine, p151793.75W fenenl fni nnllocamnntAl emineknu 05/14/91 PACE 1 CHEVRON USA 5700 CUPERTINO - 11010 N DR AP2A BLVD/90XESTEAD JOB 5202 DTH DTV HT BAILED PPH LEL FVCL DTB EXP C.ELEV DATE YELL 10-Oct-90 ----------------'N V1 --- ------------------RA 360 150 RA 09-Nov-90 V1 D/V 50 RA 21-Dec-90 V1 D/V C� J 0 Jtpiller — ryen Inc. N15)793.7500 Ionenl $Rd oov"ohmuld eoalnebrt 01/04/91 PAGE 1 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 11010 SARATOGA—SUNNYVALE RD. STEWART TITLE OF CALIFORNIA CUPERTINO, CA 2055 Gateway Place, Ste 150 San Jose, CA 95110 STEWART TITLE (408) 456-9200 of California PRELIMINARY REPORT Issued at the request of: BURRELL ENGINEERING 6939 SUNRISE BLVD., STE. #121 CITRUS HEIGHTS, CA 95610 Attention: JERRY APLASS Telephone No. 916-969-1900 Our Order No. 39219560 When replying please contact Title Officer: IRMA KELLY In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title Insurance, STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY hereby reports that it is prepared to Issue, or cause to be Issued, as of the date hereof, A Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or Interest therein hereinafter set forth, Insuring against loss . which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an Exception in Schedule B or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said Policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Policy or Policies are set forth in the attached list. Copies of the Policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which Issued this report. THIS REPORT (AND ANY SUPPLEMENTS OR AMENDMENTS HERETO) IS ISSUED FOR THE PURPOSE OF FACILITATING THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE AND NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREBY. IF IT IS DESIRED THAT LIABILITY BE ASSUMED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE, A BINDER OR COMMITMENT SHOULD BE REQUESTED. Dated as of: June 29, 1993 at 7:30 a.m. iC56� e�. IRMA KELLY, Title 6fficer The form of policy of title Insurance contemplated by this report is: 1) California Land Title Association Standard Coverage Policy — 1990 The estate or Interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Report is: A FEE Title to said estate or Interest is vested in: CUPERTINO DE ORO CLUB, A Corporation CLTA PRELIMINARY REPORT (EHeetivs 7-1-88) Order No.: 39219560 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The land referred to herein is situated in the State of California, County of Santa Clara, City of Cupertino, described as follows: PARCEL 1: BEGINNING at the intersection of the center line of the Saratoga -Sunnyvale Road, formerly known as Saratoga -Mountain View Road, with the center line of that portion of Homestead Road running Easterly from said Saratoga -Sunnyvale Road; thence along the center line of said Saratoga -Sunnyvale Road North 2.71 2/3 chains to the intersection of said center line with a Southerly line of that certain 1.197 acre parcel of land conveyed by Antone Zarevich, et ux, to C. C. Books, et al, as Trustees of the Collins School District, by Deed dated February 1, 1909 in Book 338 of Deeds, at Page 538, Santa Clara County Records; thence following the boundaries of said 1.97 acre parcel of land East 3.46 chains and S. 1 deg. 23' W. 2.71 chains to said center line of Homestead Road; thence along said center line of • Homestead Road S. 89 deg. 46' W. 3.385 chains to the point of beginning, being a portion of the Northeast one -quarter of Section 12, Township 7 South, Range 2 West, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, and being the original Collins School Lot. Excepting therefrom all that portion conveyed to the City of Cupertino by instrument recorded August 6, 1959 in Book 4505 Page 174, Official Records, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the center line of the Saratoga -Sunnyvale Road, formerly known as the Saratoga -Mountain View Road, with the center line of that portion of Homestead Road running Easterly from said Saratoga -Sunnyvale Road, thence along the center line of said Saratoga -Sunnyvale Road North 229.22 feet to the Southwesterly corner of that certain Tract of Land described and designated as Parcel No. 1 in the Deed from Jose B. Sanches, et ux to .Greenvale Homes Inc., a Corporation dated June 11, 1956, and recorded June 12, 1956 in Book 3520 of Official Records, at Page 213, Santa Clara county Records; thence leaving said Saratoga -Sunnyvale Road and running along the Southerly line of said last mentioned tract of land North 89 deg. 46' 33" East 60.00 feet; thence parallel with the said center line of Saratoga -Sunnyvale Road South 93.10 feet; thence Southeasterly along a curve to the left, tangent to proceeding course, having a radius of 290 feet, a central angle of 14 deg. 14' 38", an arc length of 72.12 fee; thence continuing Southeasterly along a curve to the left, tangent to proceeding curve, having a radius of 30 feet, a central angle of 51 deg. 491, an arc length of 27.13 feet; thence continuing Easterly along the arc of a curve to the left, tangent to proceeding curve, having a radius of 110.00 feet, a central angle of 24 deg. 08' 40" an arc length of 46.35 feet to a point in a line parallel with and distant Northerly 36 feet, measured at right angles from the center line of Homestead Road, thence parallel with the center line of Homestead Road North 89 deg. 47' 22" East 92.64 feet; thence along a curve to the left, tangent to last described course, having a radius of 955 feet, a central angle of 0 deg. 59' 2411, an arc distance of 16.50 feet; thence South 35.14 feet to the center line of SCHEDULE A CLTA PRELIMINARY REPORT -1 STEWART TITLE (7/88) Guaranty Company n i Order No. 39219560 Homestead Road; thence along the center line of Homestead Road South 29 deg. 47' 22" West 240.00 feet to the point of beginning; being a portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 12, Township 7 South, Range 2 West, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian. Also Excepting therefrom: A portion of that certain parcel of land shown as 110.782 Ac. Net" on Record of Survey Map filed for record on July 14, 1959 in Book 108 of Maps at Page 47, Santa Clara County Records, and more in described as follows: Beginning at the Southeasterly corner of said parcel at a point on the Northerly boundary of Homestead Road, as shown on said Record of Survey map; thence from said point of beginning, along the northerly boundaries of Homestead Road, the following courses: along a curve with a radius of 955.00 feet, deflecting to the right from a tangent bearing, S. 89 deg. 29' 53" W., through a central angle of 0 deg. 59' 24" for an arc distance of 16.50 feet; N. 89 deg. 30' 43" W., 92.64 feet; along a tangent curve with a radius of 110.00 feet, deflecting to the right through a central angle of 24 deg. 08' 4011, an arc distance of 46.35 feet; and along a compound curve with a radius of 30.00 feet, deflecting to the right from a tangent bearing, N. 63 deg. 39' 50" W., through a central angle of 1 deg. 42' 1311, an arc distance of 0.89 feet to a line drawn parallel to and northerly 45.00 feet, measured at right angles to the monument line of Homestead Road as said line is shown as centerline on said Record of Survey Map. Thence, along said line drawn parallel, S. 89 deg. 30' 43" E., 154.98 feet to the easterly line of said Net parcel. Thence, along last said line, S. 0 deg. 42' 27" W., 9.86 feet to the point of beginning. •As granted to the City of Cupertino by Cupertino De Oro Club, A Corporation in a Deed dated March 13, 1991 and recorded May 9, 1991 in Book L706 Official Records at Page 542. APN: 309-42-040 ARB: 311-18-029 COMMONLY KNOWN AS: 11010 SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE RD. CUPERTINO, CA -2- Order No. 39219560 At the date hereof, exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed exceptions and exclusions in a Policy of Title Insurance are as follows: I. County and City Taxes for the Fiscal Year 1993/1994, a lien not yet due or payable. 2. The Lien of Supplemental Taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California. 3. A Lease, affecting the premises herein stated, for. the term and uon the terms, covenants and conditions in an unrecorded lease referred to therein between the parties named herein, Dated December 15, 1958 Lessor Cupertino De Oro Club, A Corporation Lessee Standard Oil Company of California Western Operations, Inc. Recorded June 15, 1959 in Book 4118, Page 510 Officia Records Affects Said Land • The above lease was amended by an instrument Executed by . Cupertino De Oro Club and Petroleum Facilities, Inc. Recorded April 24, 1970 in Book 8900, Page 689, Official Records The present ownership of said Leasehold and other matters affecting the interest of the lessee are not shown herein. 4. Easement, upon the Terms, Covenants and Conditions thereof, for the purposes stated herein and incidental purposes created in that certain Instrument, Recorded May 9, 1991 in Book L706 at Page 0548 Official Records Granted to . City of Cupertino Purpose Public Utililty Easement • Affects A 15' x 15' square on the Southeasterly corner NOTE: 1. County and City Taxes for the Fiscal Year 1992/93 1st Installment $1,162.02 PAID 2nd Installment $1,162.02 PAID Land $181,045.00 Improvements $0 Exemptions $0 A.P.N. 309-42-040 Code Area 13003 2. There have been no conveyances of said land recorded within 24 months prior to the date of this report. 3. Short Term Rate - NONE 4. Any conveyance of the herein described premises by Grant Deed will require the payment of the $10.00 Survey Monument SCHEDULE Continued on next page CLTA PRELIMINARY REPORT -1 STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY SCHEDULE "B" CONTINUED: Order No. 39219560 NOTE (Continued): Preservation Fund Fee pursuant to Government Code Section 27584 and Ordinance No. NS-300.273. 5. We find no open Deeds of Trust; please confirm prior to close. 6. CALIFORNIA "GOOD FUNDS" LAW Effective January 1, 1990, California Insurance Code Section 12413.1 (Chapter 598, Statutes of 1989), prohibits a title insurance company, controlled escrow company, or underwritten title company from disbursing funds from an escrow or sub -escrow account, (except for funds deposited by WIRE TRANSFER, ELECTRONICS PAYMENT or CASH) until the day those funds are made available to the depositor pursuant to Part 229 of Title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations, (REG.CC). Items such as CASHIER'S, CERTIFIED or TELLER'S CHECK may be available for • disbursement on the business day following the business day of deposit; however, other forms of deposits may cause extended delays in closing the escrow or sub -escrow. STEWART TITLE will not be responsible for accruals of interest or other charges resulting from compliance with the disbursement restrictions imposed by State law. 7. The issuance of this report may be conditioned upon payment of a Cancellation Fee if a Policy of Title Insurance is not issued in connection with this order. Said fee shall be in an amount not less than the minimum charge set forth in the filed rate schedule, and is a required charge pursuant to Section 12404.1 of the Insurance Code of the State of California. IK/hmn • 07-22-93 �c CLTA Preliminary Report Form ■ EXHIBIT 'A' (Rev. 1-19-91) CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POUCY-1990 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, ■ftorneys tees or expenses which arise by reason of. 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or govemmental regulations (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (1) the occupancy. use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the charsciar, dimensions or location of shy improvement now or hereafter erected on the land: (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations. except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrances reautting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public record al date of policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the excerciss thereof or a notice of a defect, lion or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affeming the land has been recorded in the public records at date of policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded In the public records at date of policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to date of policy which would be binding on the rights of a purehaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: la) whether or not recorded in the public records at date of policy, but treater. suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (bl not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at date of policy, but known to the Insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy. 10 resulting in no lost or damage to the insured claimant; •l Idl atsaehinp or created subsequent to date of policy; or e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained If the insured claimant has paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or Interest insured by this policy. 1. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the Inability or failure of the insured at date of policy or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness. to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land Is situated. S. Invalidity or unonforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and in based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in landing law. B. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate of Interest insured by this policy or the transedion cresting the interest of the insured lender. by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE —SCHEDULE B, PART 1 This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: PART 1 1. Taxes or assessment which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or egoes smento on real property or by the public records. •Proceedings by a public agency which may resuh in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2 Any facts. Rights interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the lend which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements. lions or encumbrances. or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. Al. Discrepancies. conflict% in boundary lines. shortage in area, encroachments. or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excopted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TTTLE INSURANCE POLICY (6-1-87) EXtttI`St0NS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, you are not insured against loss. costs, attorneys fess. and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, end the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning: land use . land division improvements on the land . environmental protection This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of those matters which appear in the public records at policy dole. This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in hems 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks. STEWART TILE Guaranty Company (List of Printed Exceptions and Exclusions Continued on Nam Page) Pxoe 1 EXHIBIT A (Continued) Z. The right to take the land by condemning it unless: a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records on the policy date the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and it binding on you if you bought the land without knowing of the taking 3. Till• Risks: that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you that are known to you, not to us, on the Policy Date unless they appeared in the public records that result in no loss to you that first offset your title after the Policy Date - - this does not limit the labor and material lien coverage In Item 6 Covered Title Risks 4. Failure to pay value for your title. - 5. Lack of a right: to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A - OR - in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch your land This exclusion does not limit the attest coverage in item 5 of Covered Title Risks. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10-17-92) WITH ALTA ENDORSEMENT -FORM 1 COVERAGE AND AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LEASEHOLD LOAN POLICY (10-17-92) WITH ALTA ENDORSEMENT -FORM 1 COVERAGE EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly sxluded from the coverage of this policy and the company will not pay loss or damage. costs, attorney's fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. la) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws. ordinances. or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to 61 the occupancy, uss, or enjoyment of the land; (ill the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (ill) a separation in ownership or ■ change in the dimensions or ores of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a Part; or (id environmental protection, or the offset of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect. lion or encumbrances resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at date of policy. lb) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the sxtont that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a defect lion or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at data of policy. 2 Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at dale of policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to date of policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrancs, adverse claims or other matters: la) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant' (b) not known to the company, not recorded in the public records at date of policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting In no loss or damage to the insured claimant; Id) attaching or created subsequent to date of policy (except to the extent that this Policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured mortgage over any statutory lion for services, labor or material or to the sxtont insurance is afforded herein •s to •sxossmant for street improvement under construction or completed at dale of policy); or (a) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant has paid value for the insured mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lion of the insured mortgage because of the Inability or failure of the insured at date of policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent ownor of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceobility of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth In lending low. 6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of priority of any statutory lion for services, labor or materials over the lion of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent to date of policy and In not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured which at date of policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance. 7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of the mortgage insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federalbmtrvptcy. tste-insohaney -or-simitsr-c editors'-Yighta-iowsr that is based on: (i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgages being deemed ■ fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer or (ill the subordination of the interest in the insured mortgages as a result of the application of the doetrins or equitable subordination; or (iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgages being deemed a preferential transfer except when the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer, or (b) of such recordation to import notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. The above policy forms may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage the Fxeptione from Coverage in a Standard Coverage Policy will also include the following General Exceptions. (List of Printed Exceptions and Exclusions Continued on Next Pegs) STEWART TITLE Guaranty Company Page 2 This policy does not Insure agelnas x__a or damage land the Company will not pay ..gists, attorneys fees or expenses) which arias by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as exiating liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or uasasments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or ■asessments. or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascenainad by an inspection of the land or by making Inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which ■ correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. Is) Unpatented mining claims, (b) reservations or axceptions in patents or In Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (e) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (4-6-90) AND AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LEASEHOLD OWNER'S POLICY (4-6-90) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following manors are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorney'@ fees or expenses which arias by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (I) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land. (ill the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (ill) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part: (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that ■ notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from ■ violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at date of policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the aztent that a notice of the exercise thereof or ■ notice of ■ defect, lion or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at date of policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at date of policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occured prior to date of policy which would be binding on the rights of ■ purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects. liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at date of policy, but known to the Insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting In no Iota or damage to the insured claimant: (d) attaching or created subsequent to date of policy; or (a) resul'ing in lost or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant has paid value for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction verting in the insured the Grist@ or interest Insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights lawn, that is based on: (I) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being domed ■ fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, •or (ill the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential transfer results from the failure: (a) to timely record the instrument of transfer, or (b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value or a judgment or lien creditor. The above policy forms may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage Policy will also include the following General Exceptions: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs. attorneys foes or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or axistingaiana by the—cecordaofany.tsudng authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments. or notices of such proceedings. whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements. liens or encumbrancek or claims thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. S. (a) Unpatented mining claims: lb) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c) are shown by the public records. STEWART TITLE Guaranty Cc,npany Page 3 • OFF.Ct of COON TT &Sit Soon •- SANT. CLA.A CO O••TT, CALITo1RI• ORTD —BLUE —JAY 309 11 [ [ 42 9 . ;I3 •� to i NNt �' ast A Af Q 3 !J ---a --- 4___ S ' Q . .. BLA0 _ Hawk ------ to [ : 1 w •a'-�"�2, is s— ..•i � ' 'a J 1Q .------i r-----. r.r.---- is 39 r . ._�T�.._DRIVE� '••r"'•.. �,� � 8 � [ ¢ �[ o}�'r•'a"�'-r V i r aciuKoa I 2 >_�ray •'. r� .. r. _ rc , s r S {• 'A ., to.� .•� 61 Jj ' TRACT NY 3375 `C t•J�. BERKELET ESTATES I �7 it -"" • a j f- - ¢ Q 17 [ c • ' N N ...'"7-38 7r�_. Q 3 _ • j --1'---• w37 a. x. U O a :; 25: AC NET T x 1p I TRACT No 3579 = T BERKELET ESTATES UK NT2a- - . 1 u `" t jQ ' 'r OQ OS W r r• Y Lt[AC.NET F W =- X _Ty—ALBATROSS—DRJ O_ � s: d i / t f�1T+Q • TRACT N. sto[ • NONESTEAD COURT ie Ol •. .. ..ram -- —- •-•-SARATOGA L...� - SUMNYVALE —J t — -�- —ROAD—• CE) OY71C[ 0r COOM TY A3f C$&ON — AA N)A qy CIAA. CO ONTT, CAI.IrORN1A a —BLUE JAY ORIr 309 ' N w Af 1 I H4i 1 evI 1 BLAIC is 39 W -,._•` LE L [ ' t' ;r /i 1[ � ” ' � ti -----DRIVE , ..' ;lot. n •` I /1 �-----ac.r-'-' � .1 / I g '�w .. .A I 1 CT TRACT N• V • W _.� I I ,� . IJ • • .. 1� 1. Jp / �_y 12 t'--• +� ; -1 ORCHARD GL 2-6 ITTERN_= •.�� 1! /1 ; i IS l /� fT o-• tO ' TRACT No ESTATE3 ]!73 I [1 =•'- !vt_ II- j`7 _ BERRELEY I .. . 7 : r fr I J U o 233 J• f Ac MET 11 i , TRACT N3 337s IMERRELET ESTATES UN. N[2T S 1 t0 !" [ jQ r , Cl , Q a —.41 DR•-� l2s AC,NET W 1" W - . -ALBATROSS ,� o le • f+�•~~` TRACT 03"s • HOMESTEAD COURT r • Gil) A.D.S. -- —A-•--SlIAATOOA- "If / J.• f.'Ru is SUNNYVALE ROAD--14 ON ) COLOR CHEVRON CHEVRON COLOR CODE GY-450 LIGHT GRAY GY-210 DARK GRAY WH-835-S WHITE WH-740-S OFF-WHITE BL-370-S BLUE RE-360-S RED ROBERT H. AncHapeTurm m"O"MMW40 Lf=-E=- & ASSOCIATES. INC. MWE%0�..Mee WON- X) -0. cnevr®n 1137 K McDOWELL BLVD. Is joliq jomsm ARCHITECT 7 �ZTALUWA, CA. 04954 Q 0 I 'I W EEFt DAMES H. RAY. CIVIL CNGIN Northwest Region I CRITERIA FOR REVIEW OF DRIVE -THROUGH USES BACKGROUND The 1983 General Plan Amendment allows case -by -case review of drive -through facilities upon demonstration that the proposal maintains the City's development review standards relating to community design, landscaping, traffic generation, parking and circulation. The following criteria are established to review requests for drive -through facilities: 1. Urban_Design/Ci-vic-Image Urive-through facilities and drive -through lanes shall be located in a manner which is minimally -visible to public street areas. A. Visibility of drive -through lanes from public street areas shall be minimized by locating stacking lanes behind buildings, or extensive landscaped areas. B. Drive -through lanes shall not be located in required perimeter landscape setback areas adjacent to public streets or in landscape areas located between buildings and public streets. C. Drive -through facilities may locate no closer than 19000 ft. to another drive -through facility, whether or not located within the City limits. Exceptions may be granted, on a case -by -case basis, for use types or services not already provided in the general community when the following findings can be made: 1. The added facility will not disrupt traffic flow or create hazards. 2. The facility is aesthetically pleasing and discretely located. 3. The facility is at least 200 ft. from other drive -through uses. 4. All other aspects of the guidelines are complied with. 5. The service or use fulfills needs of individuals of limited mobility. 2. Location Consistent with the above civic image criteria, drive -through uses should locate in areas which are separated from residential areas and which are not likely to impact local residential streets. Additionally, drive -through facilities are excluded or discouraged from some areas of the community as specified below: -1- ' A. Drive -through uses may locate only on major collector or arterial streets as identified in the City of Cupertino General Plan. H. Buildings served by drive -through lanes must be a minimum of 200 ft. away from residentially zoned, General Planned, or used property. This standard does not apply to residential uses located across a public street. C. Drive -through lanes must be a minimum of 100 ft. from residential areas and should be separated, whenever possible, from adjacent residential uses by buildings or extensively landscaped areas. D. Drive -through uses may locate only on sites of greater than one acre in size, or a collection of parcels which are interconnected by reciprocal ingress/egress easements and/or parking easements, and which exceed t ono acre in size. E. Drive -through uses are not permitted in the Stevens Creek Boulevard frontage properties in the Manta Vista Commercial Area. Additionally, drive -through uses are discouraged in the Stevens Creek Boulevard Area mid -block between Town Center and Vallco Park. 3. Use Intensity Drive -through lanes shall not be utilized to significantly increase the vehicular activity or intensity of use at a particular site. A. Hours of operation shall be limited to 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. when drive -through facilities are near residential areas whether they are contiguous or across public rights -of -way. B. A maximum of tMlo drive -through lanes shall be permitted per facility. In most cases, only one drive -through lane shall be permitted per facility. C. Applicants for drive -through uses shall demonstrate that the drive -through will not significantly increase traffic to the site, especially during the peak traffic hour (5 p.m. to b p.m. on weekdays). 4. Circulation/Parking A. Drive -through lanes shall not significantly disrupt pedestrian or bicycle access an or off -site. B. No pedestrian crossing of drive -through lanes shall be permitted'. Pedestrian access to buildings shall be preserved independent of the drive -through lanes. -2- C. Sites which are currently deficient in parking shall not reduce the existing parking ratios due to the introduction of a drive -through facility. 5. Stacking Adequate capacity is essential to ensure that vehicles stacking at drive -through lanes do not overflow into major on -site parking aisles, or into public street areas. A. Drive -through lanes to facilities offering photographic services shall accommodate a minimum of two vehicle stacking spaces per lane. Cho/) P. All other uses shall accommodate a minimum of 8 vehicle stacking spaces per lane. C. Overflow capacity shall equal 50% of the required spaces when the lane empties into a major on -site driveway aisle and 100% of required stacking spaces when the lane obtains access directly from a public street. D. Stacking lanes shall not disrupt access to required parking spaces, and shall function independent of parking aisles. E. If stacking or overflow stacking extends beyond the property line onto an adjoining parcel, the applicant shall provide written evidence indicating consent of the affected property owner. F. Required vehicle stacking spaces per lane shall equal a minimum of 20 ft. in length for each space. 6. Noise A. Noise from drive -through speakers shall hot be audible from adjacent residentially used, zoned, or General Planned properties, nor beyond the confines of the drive -through lane. H. Drive -through lanes shall be separated from residential areas with buildings, sound walls, or extensive landscaping. 7. Air_Quality It is recognized that drive-thru facilities create the potential for localized concentrations of auto emissions. This effect is likely when drive-thru lanes are located in a manner which confine emissions from vehicles between adjacent buildings, buildings and walls, ❑r buildings and intensely landscaped areas. -3- ' A. Drive-thru lanes shall be located to avoid trapping vehicle emissions in confined spaces, or shall be designed to provide equipment to evacuate and exchange the airspace of the drive -through area to disperse pollutants within established safe exposure standards. B. Applicants shall demonstrate positive steps to protect employees of drive -through facilities from detrimental effects of exposure to emissions from idling cars. C. Drive -through lanes shall not be located adjacent to patios and other pedestrian use areas other than walkways. 8. �ig�i�ing A. Lighting of drive -through lanes or facilities shall be shielded to avoid spilling light over into nearby residential areas. 9. Rejview Progedueg • Drive -through facilities are allowed in selected commercial, planned development, office, or light industrial zones. Use permit review is required in all applicable zoning districts. -4- gls�lq3 , �'��U�')- yo, �,eyl�,� ems-. ��,vn.� . C�� . LAP. Ct/Lt - j -� V4 q`ti�g3 b�comn� 3CD' (.-vr . -u* Lo�. d-q, a am/w�- fro- Clf 4�eGvr,.Q — iY�,�o c�,c.�.v�-�_ n �) c�o �- au' on c,t10 . CIO T. vof a 4 u4e� ow 4 (cl _ uzo d. �ceue�}- : ii tip► � < 2-61 q(oIV tb f 30b Ix T a Waco glr�lco �r�(,�. n�ucr�..,�uqvc,.ruu�-�P c1„�� 2 l Cites of C'Wpertirw 10300 Torte Avenue P.O. Dog 500 Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Cupertino, CA 95015.0580 Telephone: (400) 252-4505 FAX: (4(M) 252-0753 COMMUNITY OLVLLOPhif NT Scplcmbcr 10, 1993 Robed Heald Robot 11. Lcc Re Associates 1 137 North McDowell Boulevard . Petaluma, California 94954 Regarding: Use Permit No. 17-U-90 Modified Deal Mr. Picard, 1 have completed the initial review of tho project application and as advised Ms. Loreto of your office the application is deemed incomplete. In order to remain on the Planning Commission agenda for October 11, 1993, you must submit the following additional or amended information no later than Wednesday, September 15, 1993. If it is submitted following this deadline, once the information is complete, a public hearing date will be scheduled. The additional or amended information is as follows: Site Plan J—r'io'vidc formula for parking requirement. 'fhe rriquircrncnt is 1/200 sq. n. of sales building and I/cruploycc. • -'�!Itcconfigurc bus burnout. l Identify type of adjoining land uses. 1 Show acljoiuiiig uses building cnvchopcs and finish Boor mid curb elevations. f' ,cgcnd. The difference between what is existing, approved and proposed is not clear and could easily be misinterpreted. The proposed increases in building Inca should be identified by a colored zip - a -tone. You may want to show on one plan approved/proposed and on one plan cxisling/proposcd. G. Qpovide yard light fixture spccifrcaiinns (type of light, light intensity, mounting height). Further, demonstrate that the light so cs t i11 nut be seen off site by providing a contour or point by point lighting plan. ';4lIcntify height and material type of sound walland wing halls. —Rlbcfiac P.O.S. Frames? 9. Signagc: (Legend) n: Uefinc "inl I b.'Coitf rai exemption based upon tccently adapted (Scplanber 1993) Sign Ordinace (enclosed)? �C.' In legend refer to separate sheet details dModify sign alca ns defined by ordinance e. Create a new category "compliance" or "exception" with Ordinance (yes, no) ,'Approved building outlined w•as approved by City Council 17-U-90, not ASAC. Robert Picard (17-U-90 Mod) September 10, 1993 Page -2- n Miscellaneous) (Si Chapter 17.44 Exceptions. Provide letter outlining why an exception to the ordinance should be granted. ,1r.'ASAC Resolution NO. IG 10 required monument sign be positioned like existing. Change on plans. - c."Thcrc should be eleven sign details. On plan pages 2 and 3 refer to Icg6nd numbers for identification. dcnlify method of illumination. If exposed neon lighting see 17.24.190 of ordinance. Exposed neon is reviewed because it may be too obtrusive, excessive in size, color or exposure. Address comments for Planning Commission and staff consideration. Canopy side elevation. It is unnecessary to have two Chevron logos on each of these cicvations. Remove, the logo on the spanner box. .F. Define if under canopy lighting exists. If it does, it is unnecessary to have an internally illuminated spanner. ,g'Providc a detail for the "maximum clearance" overhead sign. • ftY Identify tree types and trunk diameters for all Irccs. Architecture _Yi'he building materials should be more consistent with the surrounding property building materials. The blue fascia on the canopy should be replaced with while stucco. _,2!Idcntify wing walls adjacent to the openings to the car wash and their height. The length shown does not meet the minimum requirements as identified by the sound consultant. Refer to sound consultant report for appropriate height and length. ).'Providc a roof plan. Show rncchanical equipment. _XOn elevation plan dash in roof mounted mechanical equipment so staff can confirm it will be hidden below the parapet. Hazardous Material • 1?rovide current Soil Vapor Assessment data. Gast report dated 1989. 2. Idcnlify method and time frame for cleanup. Arborisl Report X the 1990 report from Horticultural Associates is missing the tree location plan. The report refers by number to trees on the site but the report fins no site plan to cross reference the numbers. ,121Providc an amended arborist report addressing the new impact to the existing tree to remain located at the most southeasterly portion of the site. I.nndscave Plan Provide a landscape plan. Follow the Xeriscapc Ordinance and provide the architect compliance form. Comprehensive landscape. Irrigation plan will be required at the building plan check stage. 2. Identify trunk diameter, measured 3' above grade, and tree types or trees proposed for removal. iJ Why is tree removed between new traI�nsform r and t sh enclosure. Perhaps with arborist plan this will be answered. '�'( U, 9 /(t jYln 1990 approval, Architectural and Site Approt-al Co.Com ltcc required additional tree planting within the Homestead planter. Also, shrubbery coverage around transformers. Robert Picard (17-U-90 Mod) September 10, 1993 Page -3- Noise Consultant —1�The noise consultant required that (lie car wash building be stucco for acoustics. Confirm rear building elevation is also stucco. SI VCLc , AProvidc information on the type of machincry to be used within the car wash or on plan. This is to confirm that the machinery the original acoustic report was conducted on will be used. 3. Provide an amendment to the original acoustic report addressing the increase in building square footage, changes in the car sash machinery type and 24-hour operation. 1' articularly cone ed about car wash ttpmtion ' h-tC, cXrmvg�s and on on wcckeuds. 1�,`x1 b, Miscellaneous —r7tontplete the attached Initial Study. The project is not exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act and is subject to review. When the soil, noise and arborist information has been received a date will before the Environmental Review Committee. �2!1Cccording to the City Traffic Engineer a new traffic study will not be required. __IXonfirm you want 24-hour operation on all portions of the application? Chevron was denied a 24-hour operation in 1987 and 1990. Provide additional evidence that there is a reason for a 24-hour operation at this location today. alcohol to be sold front mini -market? / .. itryvide a colored elevation plan. —f rovidc trash enclosure dclail. --7!Phc 300' list provided with your application is unreadable. There is a particular method that must be followed. I cannot confirm with the information provided whether the envelopes are correcting addressed. —S'Isrovide a title report, if available. The full number of folded plans must be resubmitted of the modified plans. Ifyou have questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (408) 252-4505 extension 277. • Sincerely, Michele Bjurman Project Manager Enclosure - Initial Study - Xeriscapc Ordinance - Sign Ordinance c: Jim Lewin, Chevron U.S.A. ghuntdcltcrs/picard I FITZROY/DOBBS Consultants In Architectural Acoustics and Noise Control B.D. DOBBS Acoustical Sociely of America N.C.A.C. September 14, 1993 Robert Picard Robert H. Lee & Associates 1137 North McDowell Blvd. • Petaluma, CA 94954-1469 Re: Car Wash Building -- Chevron Service Station 9-5700 Homestead & Saratoga -Sunnyvale Rds. Cupertino, California Dear Hr. Picard: It is our understanding that the referenced car wash building as now proposed is 52-53 feet in length, which is some 5 feet longer than was previously considered and approved by Cupertino. Further, Cupertino has requested an updated opinion as to what affect the added length will have on the acoustical issues. . We have reviewed our file on this project and find that building length (within reasonable limits) is not material to compliance with noise requirements so long as the other noise control features are in place, i.e., the sound wall and the wing walls. The increased building length is not detrimental to the noise control process and is approvable from the acoustical viewpoint. BDD:md Very truly yours, 0-100�1 B. D. Dobbs 27-L Pamaron Way, Novato, CA 94949 • (415) 883-8701 FITZROY/DOBBS Consultants in Architectural Acoustics and Noise Control B.D. DOBBS Acouatifal soci.ty of AT-O"Ica N.C..A.C. January 2a, 1991 Michael Xar.os Chevron USA. Inc. 24CO Camino Ramon San Ramon, CA 945a3 Re: Chevron Service Station 9-5700 (Carwash) • Cupertino, California fear sir. Ilanos: We have reviewed the revised Service Station layout which places the camash parallel to and so-ne 12 feet from the north property line. This location offers some advantages related to orientation and geometric relationship with sound wails. Our previous reports, dated July :2, 1990 and October 10, 1990. give background ir.fer^:aticn and establish that daytime traffic noise is typically around 57 Leq at the second floor apartment windows nearest the Service Station site toward the rear of the front building. In the evening, 9 to 11 p.n., it is aroand 54 Leq. • Yoise toward the front of the apartment building toward Saratoga -Sunnyvale Road would be higher, but that aspect was rot considered in the calculations. Camiash noise, air portion, emanating from the exit opening 1.•ould be E2.5 Leq at the second floor apartment window. Fcr a wash and dry cycie, the noise level would to at 58.5 Leq. Additional noise reduction is meted at each end of the canwash. This can be accomplished in either of two ays. The first is to build a sound wall en tre property line which ;would extend rro� m 7 seet In from: erA LOS-1 to 3 feet beyond LOS-2. (LOS - line of sight) It is shown on attacher;:xhibit 2 as "A" and in section on the upper portion of Exhibit 1. 1/ �c 27-L Pamaron Way, Novato. CA 949=9 - (415) 883-8701 r, ;-!anon Chevron usA, Inc. Chevron Service Station 9-5700 (Camash) Jan. 24, 1990 i4ith the carwash opening height at 7 feet, Sound Wall "A" should be 11.5 feet high, measured from. grade on the ad;oining property. If the carwash opening is at 9 feet, then Sound Wall "A" would need to be raised to at least 12.5 feet in height. The second approach is to extend the wall of the carwash which is parallel :o the property line son:e 6 feet, f,to the front (toward the street) and 15 feet, ±, to tF.e rear -- as shown by walls "8" and "C" on Exhibit 2. • At each end tihe wall should extend at least 2 feet beyond the pertinent LOS. The extended walls shovld extend to a height of at least 10,5 feet above the carwash floor. Either of the methods will reduce carwash noise at adjacent second floor a,-artrerts to well below the traffic noise_ levels d to within permnissible noise limits. Our recom=endation, however, is t'�Second approach, hall height is directly related to building str:;cture and floor elevation. Male-ent of the building is less critical -- even up to several feet. (If sound wall is on property line, independent cf building, any significant building-overent would require a review.) ,or the first method any fence on the remainder of the property line, and for the second method, any fence on the entire property line has no acoustical requirements; but a solid fence, e.g., a 2x weod fence, of reasonable height would be useful and beneficial to the adjacent apartment complex. . Note that in either case the precise wall location and length will be determined and verified when car„�ash is located in relation to the side property line and the nearest apartment building. Please contact us if you have need of further info nation. 8DD:md Attachments Very truly yours, /�/� S. 0. Dobbs 2 -AV POA CA :)AD 4- k0l"O;7- __ _�10 71 f- C TI od PLA# C4 50 UjV D W A 3, O uj. 25't 151tJNYVALiSAT A TOGA R 6 A D -t/--,(,4; 1/3 N— I 46t.. "Jul• . . . . . . . . . . cl� Qt: ,21 Rl Av fi t! pyiw C. :IL Mr >-o I-- k - . I p doe . /!, StC.PT �'./IP\I%TOG/I--SUNNYVP.LC IROAD 0�1-91 SCA APPENDIX A i i LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT COMPLIANCE STATEMENT Landscape Architects cenif)ing statement for compliance with landscaping/irrigation guic! Installation address: U / Installation completion date: Water Provider. G L Landscape Architect (print name): Parcel Size: 2&, o&eO ma r-T Land Use: f2L,1VAIN Y_1� L/ /r7MM G/A(— Yes HIQ (If "no", attach explanation) ❑ 1. Minimum 90% of all plantings are drought tolerant. ND 7424= ❑ 2. Turf limited to functional areas; turf and water features less than 25% of total landscape area. ❑ No 1tfiF' ❑ 3. Minimum turf area dimension - 15 ft. ❑ 4. Special ornamentals less than 10% of landscape area. ❑ 5. Terracing/sloped area in conformance ¢ ❑ 6. Drainage routed away from buildings; on -site retention of irrigation water included. ❑ No tup-P`' ❑ 7. Tree/turf separation in tree islands per ordinance. T ❑ 8. Soil addidves/amendments prodded in accordance with attached narrative explanation. NONP. ❑ 9. Water features designed/equipped per Section 9 of this ordinance. ❑ 10. Soil mulch added where appropriate (noted on diagram). ❑ 11. Planting soils delineated on plan. ❑ 12. Sprinkler heads have matched precipitation rates within each control valve. ❑ 13. Precipitation rates for a given circuit do not exceed soil absorption rates. ❑ 14. All sprinkler heads have serviceable check valves where elevation differential will cause low head drainage. ❑ 15. Sprinkler system designed for head -to -bead coverage. ❑ 16. Controller has multiple programming, repeat cycle capability, flexible calendar Program, and monthly irrigation schedule. ❑ 17. Controller set to water between 5:00 p.m. and 10:00 a.m. and equipped with rain shutoff device. ❑ 18. Monthly irrigation schedule given to landscape manager and or maintenance ❑ 19. contractor. Water budget included with plans (annual). ❑ 20. Total water usage does not exceed the Maximum Allowed Water Allowance. 1 hereby certify that the above information is accurate in compliance with the landscape standards of the City of Cupertino's outline in this ordinance. Landscape Architect: Date: AFFIX STAMP HERE AN ESOP COMPANY ROBERT H. LEE S. ASSOCIATES. INC. ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1137 NORTH McDOWELL BOULEVARD • PETALUMA. CALIFORNIA 94954-1469 (707) 755.1680 Mailing Address. P 0 Box 750908. Petaluma. CA 94975-0908 Fex (707) 765-990B Ar._ht.c[ JONN W JONNEON September 19, 1993 JOHN a ..C.. Ar 1-- Ms. Michele Bjurman .tEVEN J K-NER City of Cupertino `h'i"[ Community Development AAEGLi.caPENCEp 10300 Torre Ave. AMfe N pAY E:�I Enpn..r Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 RE: CHEVRON USA PRODUCTS COMPANY 11010 DE ANZA BLVD. • CUPERTINO, CA SS p9-5700; RHL JOB #8937.01 USE PERMIT 17-U-90 Dear Ms. Bjurman: The following is an itemized response to the letter dated September 10'. 1993 requesting the additional or amended information. SITE PLAN ITEM 1. Formula for parking requirements is provided on sheet 1, Project Summary. • 2. New bus layout has been shown on sheet 1. 3. Adjoining land uses are listed on sheet 1, Project Summary. 4. The building envelopes and finish floors on the adjoining properties could not be determined. To the north of the property exists a two story apartment complex separated by lane and carport. Located to the east of the property is the owner of the site, Cupertino De Oro Club. Their building is separated by parking spaces. The elevations on site will not be change significantly that it will effect adjoining property or curb elevations. 5. Approved and proposed is shown on sheet 1.1. Existing and proposed is shown on sheet 1. 6. See detail 013, sheet 3 for yard light specifications. See sheet 5 for lighting plan. 7. See sheet 2 for sound and wing wall criteria. 8. P.O.S. frame, graphics panel, was eliminated. r, MARIETTA. CIA BACRAMENTO. CA BELLEVUE. WA LA HABRA. CA Page 2 September 19, 1993 Ms. Michele Bjurman 9. SIGNAGE (Legend) a. Int. is defined as internally. b. See exception letter. C. See sign area calculations, sheet 1. d. See exception letter. e. See exception letter. f. Note has been changed in legend. (Sign Miscellaneous) a. See exception letter. • b. Monument sign has been rotated, see sheet 1. C. Refer to sheets 2 and 3. d. All signs that are illuminated are internally. See Sign Area Calculations, sheet 1. e. See exception letter. f. See lighting plan, sheet 5, for canopy lighting and exception letter. g. See detail A10, sheet 3. 10. See sheet 1. ARCHITECTURE 1. Building materials have been change to reflect previous approval. See sheet 2 and 3. 2. See enclosed Fitzroy/Dobbs letter dated January 24, 1991 and sheet 2. • 3. See sheet 2. 4. See sheet 2. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL 1. See CUSA letter dated August 31, 1993. 2. Existing fuel storage and used oil tanks will be replaced with new double wall fiberglass storage tanks that meet or exceed federal and state laws. Contaminated soil will be removed per Regional Water Quality Control Board and California Water Code. If it is deemed necessary further remediation will take place at the time of construction. ARBORIST REPORT 1. See sheet 1. 2. Parking space has been moved to eliminate any potential impact. P013ERT H. LEE 6 ASSOCIATES. INC. I.a Page 3 September 19, 1993 Ms. Michele Bjurman LANDSCAPE PLAN 1. See sheet 4 and enclosed architect compliance form. 2. See sheet 1. 3. Tree M7 listed in the arborist report was recommended to be removed. 4. See sheet 4. NOISE CONSULTANT 1. See sheet 2. 2. See attached cut sheets. 3. See Fitzroy/Dobbs letter dated September 14, 1993. MISCELLANEOUS 1. See attached Initial Study. 3. Twenty-four hour operation is being requested for food and fuel sales. Our client believes that they can provide convenience to the late night and early morning travelers. The will be security measures in place to deter any potential crime. The carwash will operate at the restricted hours of lam to lOpm. 4. Alcohol will not be sold from property. 5. Color elevations are enclosed. 6. See detail G16, sheet 3. 7. A revised mailing list and stamped addressed envelopes are enclosed. 8. Preliminary title report is enclosed. ROBHRT H. LES 6 ABBOCIATBB. INC. Chi • Page 4 September 19, 1993 Ms. Michele BJurman The preceding information should assist you in your review. If further information is needed, please contact me immediately. Sincerely, ;FWE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Robert Picard Job Captain Enclosures rA"XVA%&AMMk r.RM gOssnr M. LEE B ASSOCIArss. INC. City of Cupertino CommpnUy Develop+uenf Department FA 'I' I A N SsI T,TA:L,^ 10300Torre Avor:e Culxn:no.Calilumie 95014 Wepl:one: (403)25245-35 MX:rum!xr. (403)252-0753 Name and Tille �E /" l0-2 Firm: C nallo IV FAX Number: 83oS Date of. Transmittal: , >g Number of Pages following this cover sheet: Description of hinterial.Transmitted: Message: Name and Title: �ll l-/�P/-1 i/vi,�i'ao PIdNe��A. (, Please Respond: o Response Necessary []Via.FAX Din Teleplione'D a Mail [IFT11171MATERIALS im-c ur.1) ARE NOT AS DESCRIBED, OR IF Tlll M ARE PROBLEMS WITH LEGIBILITY, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE, (408) 252-4SOS. Y \. 10100 Ione Avenue P.O. no. 51N1 Cu(aalino. CA 95014-3255 CupcOino, CA 95015-OSW T, hone: (408) 252.450S FAX: ON) 252.0753 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT January 17, 1991 Mike Manos Chevron Research and Technology P.O. Box 5045 San Ramon, CA 94583-0945 RE: Chevron Station Remodel Homestead and DeAnza 40 Cupertino, CA I Dear Mr. Manos: Mark Caughey and I have reviewed the revised plans submitted for the above project and we have the following comments: 1) Building Architecture: The addition of the red tile roof begins to address the Planning Commission's concern regarding the building design and its compatibility with the surrounding structures; however, we would suggest that an effort be made to expand on the theme, perhaps by using a wood fascia instead of the metal, wood wrapped columns, and corbel details suggestive of the historic building to the east of the site. 2) Trees: The preservation of existing trees on the site has been an on -going concern. The revised site plan does indicate the preservation of a number of existing trees, however the arborist's report states that the tree driplines must be fenced in order to insure tree survival. We are doubtful that the arborist's recommendations can be adhered to given the layout on the revised site plan. Any Use Permit that is eventually issued will likely contain a condition requiring a certified tree preservation plan that is specific to the site. The revised site plan indicates the preservation of the two 601, eucalyptus trees. These should be removed since the arborist's report declares them to be a hazard. 3) Noise: A revised noise study should be submitted since the location and orientation of the car wash has been changed. We are especially interested in the time of day that the carwash noise level would become greater than the ambient noise level. 4) Driveway/Landscaping: The Planning Commission indicated concern that one of the driveways on DeAnza was located too close to Homestead Road and that there was a lack of landscaping along DeAnza Road. The revised site plan addresses the landscape problem but shows the driveway in the same location. We realize that a problem exists because of the space required for a transit pull-out and we suggest that you call the City's Traffic Engineer, Glenn Grigg, to work out a solution. 5) Lighting: The indicated location of the light fixtures could represent a problem if they allow too much light to spill off the site. I have enclosed the guidelines for a "Lighting Design Statement" which will be needed when ASAC reviews the project. Please give Mark Caughey or myself a call if you have any questions about the above comments. sincerel�, Bill Hopkins Planning Intern • These items shall be included in the specific lighting plans in written form prior to review by the Architectural and site Approval Committee and staff. Failure to provide all information may delay formal review and approval. 1) Light fixture specifications including but not limited to: Type of light. Light intensity. Mounting height. 2) Demonstrate that light source will not be seen off site. 3) Provide a point by point lighting plan for the entire site which take into account all sources of light. 4) Indicate tree context on site plan. 5) Provide figures for: Average Horizontal Maintained Illumination. Average Maximum to Minimum Ratio. If you have any questions regarding these requirements please call Tom Robillard at (408) 252-4505. 40 Cupertino Ile Oro ('10) P.O. 13ux 361, Cuprrthm, California 95015 February 27th 1991 Application No. 17-U-90 Chevron at Homestead & De Anza. To: The Cupertino Planning Commission. Dear Commissioner: The above matter is on your agenda for the March llth meeting and on behalf of the De Oro Club we would like to bring the following to your attention: The Cupertino De Oro Club was formed in 1921 by a group of Cupertino women meeting for social and cultural purposes. Hearing that the Collins School building had been abandoned by the School District, the group decided to raise funds and purchase the land, using the building as a permanent meeting place. In 1958 it was proposed that, in order to meet the expense of making the building more suitable for public use, the Clubhouse itself should be moved and the corner site leased to provide income. By this time, Cupertino had been incorporated and the new boundary between Cupertino and Sunnyvale had been set with . Homestead Road as the dividing line. Because of its ties with Cupertino, the Club successfully ,petitioned for annexation of its approximately three acres to Cupertino. Permission was obtained from the Council for the use of the corner site as a service station. The lease with Standard Oil (Chevron) went into effect in 1959. The Council also granted permission to move the building provided the Club dedicated 40 feet from the center of Homestead Road; this was done and the Club took out a loan of $25,000 to pay for the very careful moving of the building. The Bylaws of the De Oro Club state amongst its purposes: "to -preserve and maintain our historic building" and to fulfil this purpose uninterrupted income from the corner site is vital. The building is indeed one of the few remaining histo- c buildings in Cupertino and the Club members have shown their dedication to this trust for 70 years! Our relationship with Chevron as tenants has been very satisfactory and we have found them helpful and cooperative in matters concerning both sites. • Cupertino De Oro Club 1'.0. Box 36t, Cupertino, California 95015 2.27.91 61 Cupertino Planning Commission. 2 We therefore urge the Commission to give favorable considerarion to the application by Chevron for the remodelling of the station. The resultant income to the Club will enable us to continue the costly maintenance projects necessary to preserve the integrity of this historic Cupertino Building - one of the few remaining built before 1900. Thank you for your consideration. Winifred Hill, Presidgn-t. Doris Hijmans, a rman. Standing Committee on De Oro Properties. CC Mark Caughey, Planning Dept. vnc ... vcv.vr.. •+oT •awv cc ,.v.+av—o+n—vvov ry.r a.o. va �•aar,v .ova r,oa 40 CHEVRON RESEARCH 6 TECHNOLOGY COMPANY Teleooplar Services 2400 Camino Ramon, Room K1001C San Ramon, California 94583 WORK ORDER N TO: Name / "/fl-�,A- ` llwdleI6 y (Company) Cam"' 6/2 TlAld P L ANN/N (f -,DC-PT � (City) C u P EyZ T/N O (Fax Number) 4/04' 2 S Z U 7 S` 3 (Confirming Number) FROM: (Noma) MAKE AI4A/6 S (Division) C2i'G. (Raahf8ldgri- �y/S & S/Z " g 6 O / NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER):. `1 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: S EE A 77-A C* 6 D T � IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE PHONE 415-842-90*- IMMEDIATELY, g 601 OUR TELECOPIER NUMBER: RAPICOM 120 (415) 842- F(3 0 S OPERATOR'S NAME: TIME TRANSMITTED: DATE TRANSMITTED: RETURN ORIGINAL TO: YJW88M144 ,. .,..._.._.:..-pro t..._.�-,:�r_.,-',: -��r-F�,^ }...t. ;_-''":ct�r., a+.�', y, _ � j�?._:v ��r, ;=_:i;• v ncv azv �ornvvr •oa.ovv +cam ne .tea v. ate. G.. � n(.P a0-73; "�0 161W'"al.gatp-, 0 r� Ct a%J(ZO,J P2-4pC)sES rlrNc2 MODIFICAT(oNS To THE PREV(OLCSLe /%peROUED PLANS �IZ-u-9U 25-eA-9o� fiS $No�^� ON TttE ATTACHED 5tfCdrs 1• cAni0PY /nopIFIIr/4%/ONS To IIJcRERSE 71NE Pf etC6 iJ7-Aig6 of OFF-wN/TF 57'ucco or.� 779E Frfrc(/1 ( lzcmov/n/Cr 3LHE GAC(G42cKND rtra'c s of�l LONG S(DC S,, 11-JM CNAIJgINC1 Tt/F ((EYEBROW � TU A. lSCKE lSi9ND �g �) W ITH GrtMY --T2IPc ( I i ") , , 2, rtc-moJ rN 4 it(E CANOPY EXT6r,JSic),4 oVE/L TU TN E FOODMART ( — Z-1, Stluradfz) AtJD ASSOC(A1 /61> -bPCs I*'( COL"MNS ADiAC6or TO MA(4LT . 3, 6N TNT j JTtrtnlgl.i IL.LwM(UM76D $( Ch.cvv oti+ " woc?-t>m Aav S14N5 THE EOt-O2g wo-(-D -REV62SE TO (l $LL(E FACES W1TH p-)H TE rtETu(w,",f IF T(f1>R.of,0SEp cUAN4E5 ►.IEcESS1TATa 2ETK2N To ri Punuc NERR(w(� of TttC- PLANtJ(t-JG CoMM. CITY CounlC►L 0P, ASA(f PLEASE ADV(S£ CPQoPoSEa} ELEVAFION R (mapasEA) EZEVAFr B J n n I FI- ELEVATION A (AWROVC!> i 1 Project: Chevron - Cupertino SS# 9-5700 Date: February 26, 1991 PLANT LIST TREES Symbol Botanical Name Common Name mu CD Cedrus deodora Deodar Cedar 48" Box As Shown PB Prunus cerasifera Purple Leaf Plum 36" Box As Shown Trunus blireiana' PC Pyrus calleryana Flowering Pear 36" Box As Shown 'Aristocrat' QA Quercus agrifolia Coast live Oak 36" Box As Shown SS Sequoia sempervirens Coast Redwood 36" Box As Shown SHRUBS ,Symbol Botanical Name Common Name S10 AH Alyogyne huegelii Blue Hibiscus 5 Gal. As Shown AD Arctostaphylos densillora McMinn Manzanita 5 Gal. As Shown 'Howard McMinn 44PCF Ceanothus Trosty Blue' Frosty Blue 5 Gal. As Shown California lilac ED Escallonia'Newport Dwarr Dwarf Escallonia 1 Gal. 2'-6" o.c. EE Escallonia exoniensis Escallonia 5 Gal. 5'-0" o.c. Trades' HH Hemerocallis hybrid Daylily 1 Gal. As Shown (no yellow varieties) LS Leptospermum scoparium New Zealand Tea Tree 15 Gal. As Shown ND Nandina domestics Dwarf Heavenly Bamboo 1 Gal. 2'-6" o.c. 'Harbour Dwarr tYl GROUNDCOVER Symbol Botanical Name Common Name MW Spacing AU Arctostphylos uva-ursi Bearberry 1 Gal. 18" o.c. 'Pt. Reyes' VL Viola labradorica Flats 8" o.c. VINES Svmboi Botanical Name Common Name EF Euonymus fortunei radicans Common Winter Creeper 1 Gal. As Shown • RED, WHITE AND BLUE BEDDING PLANT LIST ANNUALS LIST- SUN HEIGHT 6"- 12" WINTER SPRING SUMMER FALL Pansy Alyssum Alyssum Alyssum Primrose Ranunculus Lantana Chrysanthemum Viola Dianthus Ageratum Primrose Nemesia Celosia Ageratum Viola Dianthus Lobella Forget Me Not Lobelia Phlox Salvia HEIGHT 18" - 24" Bachelor's Button Delphinium Snapdragons Asters Iceland Poppy Salvia Celosia Chysanthemum Snapgragon Snapdragon Bachelor's Button Linaria Lupine Dianthus Stock Stock Statice Nicotiana Petunia Phlox Salvia Zinnia NOTE: SELECT ONLY RED, WHITE OR BLUE VARIETIES FROM THE LIST ABOVE. Chevron� Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 2410 Camino Haman, San Ramon, California • Phone 14151 842.9500 Mad Address Pa Boa 5004, San Ramon, CA 94583-0804 D. A. Walsh Spenalnts, Ruparty 0-10prn m April 1, 1991 0. R. Cnspen 0. E. Kohmann J. H. Ough B. C. Owen M. R. Purcell W. T. Scudder T. J. Vukelich S. A. Willer Rosie Storm Yale Investment Company 438 Cambridge Ave. e Palo Alto, CA 94306 Re: Masonry Sound Wall, 180 Feet Proposed Rebuild, Chevron SS# 9-5700 11010 North De Anza Blvd. Cupertino, CA Dear Rosie: Attached is information on the proposed sound wall Chevron is recommending to the city. Please review and get back to me if you have any questions. We are scheduled for an April 8 meeting with the city. The city would like for you to attend, or at the very least, give them written confirmation you are in favor of the wall as proposed. The person handling the project for the city is: • Mark Caughey (408) 2524505 City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Ave. Cupertino CA 95014 Please call me at (415) 842-9555 or our consultant Mike Mantis (415) 842-8601. Very truly yours, W. T. Scudder WTS/b1j:T1-228 Attachment cc: Mike Manos Mark Caughey •• J N ' EXISTING TREE TO K S 00.00.00' IB6 1 1 .. . ... .. ... .. . ........... ...... 1 I _�1 7RlISN E/10.0SIIRE - / ".1 120 50. FT. EXISTING TREES TO BE REIOYEO 1 EXISTING TREE iBE RENOYEO - - ►NOIINO SPACES \) TTI f -, _ MRN0ICM M LINO 111 HANDICAPPED FY ®O PRANCINGSPACE J 111•-0' 20'•0'1 co VA"FOOO PART E CIISM .ER IIM]-BI 20•-S' X f'-B' -I .T —�-- --- N�d SOFT. .0. I 8$ TO RE/Ii11INTREE - CARN SI IOILOI1C - ►Ofif — — — — — — 25•-1- If'-B• Ifl GUMO 1121 CIMRO P0= 7120 SO. FT. NT IS-2LI' - - .. 1 .- coNCRET NC I 1 .. '.'. _ ISTARO EXISTING LICKT COIM POLE ANO CONCRETE BASE TO BEYE 52.00- EXISTIPC PG/E BOX C O D D Trin ❑ _CI ININIV \ i r3I 0 4. T ......... ........... GRADE -TffT MAL i A La4r. C�e LEM4, Ft F-AcE Ij-o Sca LE of4r- -(,q7- -wesr- PA tj C- -L TALI: >, T-EAI PANC-L.S x 16' 41 L -I%IA 66.N2r -oilrs i-tqiqr MASoIVAY' i-o7- LIA16 WALL CHELIROIJ ss,,t9--S7-Q0-, -Pe,4A1Z,411H0AI6SF45#4-D 3 1 �J o=o�� sl 3'-0'� --- NOR rH �A C E SCORED SPLIT FACE + S -c ok —I-- k�o a riq FA. c E: Col-13:5-- j::IICF- -SPL.iT- FACE i ,11ti.! Combed Face Split Face A Z" 4.81 BEST'S Tapered 5 Score Split Face Block Elegant modern design. Creates an illusion of smaller module units with the vertical score shadow. This versatile concrete masonry unit was created to provide the design profession with a block that is economical and has flexibility in scale and texture. Available in 8" widths with one or two sides scored and split, and in 12" widths with one side scored and split. LrJi,trl O '-A change for the derrer.. �1 Cliff rK HLQGKS ING. 34240 AL'JAFACC•NILES PCAC UNIGN CITY CAL:F[FrdA 945E7 (4151 471.1111 ASAC 17-U-90 RESOLISTON NO. OF THE ARCHn'F)CIVRAL AND SITE APPROVAL CCII IIn EE OF THE CITY OF CLADE 40 RDCCMMENDING APPROVAL OF APPLICANT: Chevron Research and Technology Cmy)any PROPERTY OWNER: Cupertino De Oro Club APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: P.O. Sox 5045, San Ramon, CA PRa7DCP IDCATTON: 11010 North De Anza Boulevard FINDINGS: The Architectural and Site Approval Committee finds as follows with regard to this application: 1) That the Sign Program as conditioned herein is consistent with title 17 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 2) That the masonry wall as proposed meet the requirements of condition 12 of 17-U-90. 3) That the lighting plan meets the City's standard criteria for site lighting. 4) That the Landscaping plan as conditioned herein meets the requirements of the Xeriscape Guidelines. CONDITIONS: 1-8) Standard Architectural and Site Approval Committee conditions to the extent that they do not conflict with the special conditions listed herein. In the event of conflict, the specific conditions listed herein shall prevail. 9) The approval is based upon site plan dated March 29, 1991, sign elevations dated September 26, 1990 (2 sheets), Masonry wall criteria dated Mardi 29, 1991 (3 sheets), and Landscape plans dated November 21, 1990 (2 sheets) except as may be amended by conditions enumerated herein. 10) The applicant shall provide staff a letter from a ra �pe Architect recommending appropriate ground cover for under the Oak trees prior to issuance of building permits. 11) The landscape plans shall be certified by a Landscape Architect prior to ismkvm of building permits. 12) The utility vault adjacent to Homestead Road shall be screened from view with appropriate landscaping. Resolution No. ASAC 17-u-90 Page -2- PASSED AND ADOPTED this 8th day of April, 1991 at a regular meeting of the Architectural and Site Approval committee of the city of o pertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: MEMBERS: NAYS: MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: MEMBERS: ABSENP: MEMBERS: ATI%Sr: APPROVED: Thares R. Rcbillard Patricia Jackson, C airman Planner II Archit. and Site Approv. oon. asac/rsl7u9O 0 r,Jw o.. .'ark, is etc. 10, 0w •�r D2lc 'Ej'ces , wed— ,-1- t at .s�� t -�xc w�a� LQ r�J, ✓, �� /ten -Z�G yi,(3 - s 4.9J #JrL— k,,?J i-11Uj ; watt/J7 1 is `` 64v-ar c-+ ', aaMv' - --"_u... _ -. .._, .. is:u.;,;...�<�;:..:;,�.v:�:,x—r�<•-�;µ:r;Ya�•,�:-.%';�1w_tj�se��r...9:. :���sr.rn>«�: cs.-r�.--=:,�:.:�, ,I April 8, 1991 City of Cupertino Planning Department 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 To Whom It May Concern: • The conceptual landscape pplan prepared by our company, dated 11/21/90 and revised by Chevron 3/22/90, is in compliance with the "Landscape and Irrigation Guidelines" for the City of Cupertino (June 4, 1990). We are recommending one minor change at this time, that fir bark instead of redwood bark mulch be specified beneath the Quercus agrifolia trees. The site specific irrigation plan will be developed once the conceptual landscape plan is approved and the design will reflect the Guidelines. Attached is the requested Certification Statement. Should you have any questions contact David Gates at (415) 736-8176. Sincerely, qUndalt L.G:ch enclosure -' DAVID t.OAIlf i ASfOC1Att3 LAND PLANNING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • URBAN DESIGN 74I0TASSAIARA EN , DANVILLE, CA 94576. 415.837.8176 Landscape Architect's Certifying Statement for Compliance With Landscaping/Irrigation Guidelines Installation Address: S,'-,atcxj,r - Sunnyvale Rd./Homestead Rd, Installation Completion Date: Fa11 1991 est. Water Provider: Calif. Water Service Co. Landscape Architect (print name): David 1.- Gates s Associates Parcel Size: 180' x 186' Land Use: Service Station YES NO (If "NO", attach explanation) CR ❑ 1) Minimum 909b of all plantings are drought -tolerant. (R ❑ 2) Turf limited to functional areas; turf and water features less than 25% total landscape area. R) ❑ 3) Minimum turf area dimension = 8 ft ® ❑ 4) Special ornamentals less than 10% of landscaped area. N.A. ❑ ❑ 5) Terracing/sloped areas in conformance. N.A. ❑ ❑ 6) Drainage routed away from buildings; on -site retention of irrigation water included. ® ❑ n Tree/turf separation and tree islands per Guidelines. R ❑ 8) Soil additives/amendments provided in accordance with attached narrative explanation. ® ❑ 9) Water features designed/equipped per Section 4 of Guidelines. ❑ 10) Soil mulch added where appropriate (noted on diagram). M ❑ 11) Planting zones delineated on plan. * ❑ ❑ 12) Sprinkler heads have matched precipitation rates within each control valve circuit. * ❑ ❑ 13) Precipitation rates for a given circuit do not exceed soil absorption rates. * ❑ ❑ 14) All sprinkler heads have serviceable check valves where elevation differential will cause • low head drainage. * ❑ ❑ 15) Sprinkler system designed for head -to -head coverage. * Cl ❑ 16) Controller has multiple programming, repeat cycle capability, flexible calendar program, and monthly irrigation schedule. * ❑ ❑ 17) Controller set to water between 5..00 p.m. and IND a.m. and equipped with rain shutoff device. * ❑ ❑ 18) Monthly irrigation schedule given to landscape manager and/or maintenance contractor. * Cl ❑ 19) Water budge included with plans. I hereby certify that the above information is accurate and complies with the landscape standards of The City of Camertino. Landscape Architect: (Dat —�fftx-SCatt'ip HQre�, * = Irrigation plan not yet developed. `t `✓ O~ %l . CITY OF CUPS aUM 10300 TORRE AVENUE, CUPEgM40, CA 95014 (408) 252-4505 TO: Mike Manos, Chevron R&T FROM: Mark Caughey, City Planner SUWWr:FAX Transmittals of 3/25 and 3/27 DATE: March 29, 1991 'Ibis memo responds to the FAX materials you sent this week concerning the proposed masonry wall and landscaping revisions. Here are my comments: 1) PROPOSED lnP= WAYL A) Be sure that the piers and supporting structure are completely within your property boundaries; it's hard to determine on the site plan if this condition can be met. • B) ASAC will require some evidence that the adjoining property owner or manager has seen the proposed wall textures. if you can get a sign -off from them, it would speed things along. Otherwise, we'll send a formal request for comment, but that will take longer. C) The proposed 6' height at the west end of the wall is acceptable; however, since that portion of the wall does not adjoing the car port and is visible to the public on both sides, staff will recommend that both faces of that section have split face block texture. I realize that Tomax walls don't cone that way; it may be necssary to custom -build that 20 ft. reach of wall from actual split face block material. 2) LANDSCAPE REVISIONS A) Substitution of Oak trees on the north perimeter is probably not going to work, unless you can identify a specie which is semideciduous; otherwise, an evergreen broadleaf is preferred. B) Removal of irrigated plant material beneath the Oak tress is OK, but some form of surface soil covering per your arborist's recommendation is needed. C) Return the 4th tree to the Homestead Rd. frontage; there's adequate room for it behind the walk. D) Please ensure that the utility vault easement at the S/E corner of the site is adequately screened. a.- v o v rn. .... wsv-own-0000 nor ca •ys sv•wanu.vsv r.va CHEVRON RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY COMPANY Telecopler Services 24co Camino Ramon. Room K1001C San Ramon, California 94583 WORK OHDER Jf r `7 3 2- TO: (Name) M q f & CAK qi f*ft y (Comoany) C / Mt d 1C9?AM rA^r O (cityl (Fax Number) �p 8 Z S Z— 07 S 3 (Conflrmina Number) • 1=ROM: ame 1 4 E p4 A N d S (Division) C J 2ON -- c 2 TC (RoomlBida) (44 ) 5�,L a? 1 Z ` it 110 O NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER):. 4 rjoT- % / yE 2EV1 SE.D L Isc/tpC— PlT?rJ Stt0L4).S% 2. OAKS 2EPt44C(nMa 3 etOC464 PC-AR-S ; DQCd-?'fa(J OF N_N.oE2S7_02Y i°I-AlvrfN•, • hT 0OKS 1 '! S jYtEEr i R FES A L0n14 t dMCS (6A°> (Z(f-MK,cC- D T`0 3 / -D 5 eT 8ACK QE/f/ND S(i> E w A (- /< C P E2 T'E 1. E CCAJ w/ , ,x W i S vJ tt I rTE 'uJ ALso A SIGs) ArL.CF1 1 Af3LG �- .DIAG2,4M IS ATTACHEt) • i WtL.L CALL `Cori S IEo 2T L r F o g Y o (-l2 C. o rnrtira >J T-S -_� I IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES. PLEASE PHONE 415-842-9416 IMMEDIATELY. OUR TELECOPIER NUMBER: RAPICOM 120 (415) 842.9417 OPERATOR'S NAME: TIME T? .':`,.'.'.: , I_: . DATE -:' \NSMI l TED: RETURN ORIGINAL TO: YJW6892.14.4 v. cs.. rornvor ra�.avv rc� r.v z -v vva or avrvz zv•vv no'.ov-0rr'�eI`""'" - LM CHEVRON RESEARCH 6 TECHNOLOGY COMPANY Telecopler Services 2400 Camino Ramon, Room K1001C San Ramon, California 94553 r WORK ORDER # TO: (Name)� Nlf%%ic te- (ComppnV) CirY of c�tP��YfN� (Fax Numbo7S3 (Confirming Number) • FROM: (Name) M egg M (Division) G ffnE ✓K a Aj (Room/Bldg.) NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER):. Jr SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: 7#6 /A1rdKv fr1,j-J ..DEPICTS Tff e- 14f roN2Y id I L L 1'2cjPo .re-p fat THE AIO/Uff 51-D C- OF O c(2 L o T, WE FELT TN,lT of .5t - f'od7- ?A t-L SEcTfonj - i r Tfte FicdNT • v>ou c.D f414 rc // Le O TO %f(E f)14t72TMCAJT- COrflot&K WILL /ILON4 Jac AflJaA Iw /-rl( NO 516"J Fl cr}N7- NeaAT ICE /MPAcTa✓ pN FKNc7'/on/ /1ran /r Wou` D APre: n2 LESS c0NFfAJIIJCt. IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE PHONE 415.842-9416 IMMEDIATELY. OUR TELECOPIER NUMBER: RAPICOM 120 (415) 842.9417 OPERATOR'S NAME: TIME TRANSMITTED: _ DATE TRANSMITTED: I RETURN ORIGINAL TO: YJW6892.144 � � I SIGN AREA TABLE = SS# 9-57M CUPERTINO ITEM UNIT ITEM ALLOWABLE NO. DESCRIPTION DIMENSION, FT. SO. FT. QTY SQ. FT. SO. FT. 1. Ground Sign - Logo 4.16 x 4.67 19A 1 19.4 2. Ground Sign - Price 4.16 x 4.67 19.4 1 19.4 3. Ground Sign - Food Mart/Car Wash 8A6 x 0.81 6.8 1 6.8 SUBTOTAL A 45.4 50 4. Bldg. Sign - "Chevron' Word 9.25 x 1.96 18.1 2 36.2 5. Bldg. Sign - Logo; Canopy 2.00 x 225 4.5 2 9.0 6. Bldg. Sign - Logo; Spanner 1.54 x 1.83 2.8 3 8.4 7. Bldg. Sign - 'Food Mart' 10.42 x 1.58 16.5 1 16.5 8. Bldg. Sign - 'Car Wash' 8.50 x 1.46 12.4 1 12.4 SUBTOTAL B 82.5 172 ** 9. Exempt Sign - 'Self' (Serve) 1.00 x .5 .5 6 3.0 10. Exempt Sign -'Exit .... 9.00 x .67 6.0 1 6.0 11. Exempt Sign - "Entrance" 3.00 x .67 2.0 1 2.0 ' = Based on 186' of street frontage. Based on 155' of building frontage. 0 0 h A n A F 4 i 7 i c r a a a N- -f--- "� o •y O fie N �o eF ...• W �^cN FANNLLJ ER 133 I O J SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE ROAD ®: LoLAT(ON OF stow I T•EM tiJo. SITE PLAN "�`� ����� ��� •,�m���c I N 'r it o Nl c 7-�y E o c 0 /L (,-)1% S t v E b R E TIg ov 1 T 60T&OV "' � FtE G-yCrT s f 17E • o N LY n O. P i i.- J 1.- 1. b. V- I... N -=—r- o� 77 lawww.. �- 1 1"llealm-w! �•_..-�frR�� T> SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE ROAD IN ��-, -� �- ' 1: �1!' �t �+� •� !, � 0601��id „^tip :'• ►^� ' { .,�� ' Vary)ny �hpa g6tit 0t piE') + • y'1� .:' ., „' ,t > t �zU eltitis�ty�s ecign r�quirem ) �, ' 1 di l�Gu G�dtr,��a- o tav S.::Anci c: a g Willif a fu r j pe 6 c r. V. i ,�gt i p� !? l ai cat Pt14 k Y: $ iev�d AJC �,,�'' ►'+• • ' �'� , ° i !,, orr;Cl�4id)t '�s are kl �:11it Yx USi�1 +1 r r t r ils can - LREIR '1'� A '� _ ._.i s �,�- �itit�'�•_ Ott �,4 ,; ,�,, ��! � � �£ EijiM . ' .-R=•��� .r� ,7�9rr l�,j1. .yY, �� I��'.`l�� `Z _,!� Z�„��;��. �.'i j ' �,fl 1. � -,Q �Z(,n,� � ��f.-''•7 , �`ti .I �il...�i��y►ti • ;! f j,` f �': �vrrtvcr. o,..vv� �c� ,.o.�iv�v�4-VPVW far "'I-113�`'i'fl+04°itif'oa ij ii- - -- 1j t 1 c, BEST'S 'capered 5 Score Split Face Block Elegant modern design. Creates an illusion of smaller module units with the vertical score shadow. This versatile concrete masonry unit was created to provide the design j profession with a block that is economical and has flexibility In scale and texture. Ava-lable in 8" widths with one or two sides scored and split, and in 12" widths wit'n one side scored and split. tr1At:'1 0 •A Cn;nx �, • m+Bettor' CHEST'S HLQCKS INC-- 34640 ALVARACC-MILES RUAI.: JNION CITY CALIFCPNIA S4'r,137 A -et f4951 471-'1 99'1 OCT-10-1990 1`.5:19 FROM -Foil Impressiais TO 842941? '__Pr12112� FITZRO Yi OBBS Consultants In Architectural Acoustics and Noise Control B.D. DOBBS Acoustical Saclsiy of Arnerigs N.C.A.C. October 10, 1990 Dale! Wahlen Chevron USA, Inc. Chevron Research & Technology Company 2400 Camino Ramon San Ramon, CA 94583 Re: Noi!;e Analypis -- Chevron Service Station Carwash (Addendum) Cupertino, Road and Homestead Road Cupertino, California Deal- Mr. Wahlen: In respon:;e to the request by Cupertino staff that additional noise data be subnitted, we have after pre -arrangement with Mark Caughey) made noise surveys in the evening on September 26, 27 and 29. These dates were respectively a Wednesday, Thursday and Saturday and were in addition to the earlier survey on June 19, 1990, a Tuesday. By averaging the data from these four days, the calculated noise level at the second floor of the adjoining Villa Camino Apartments (Position B) was 0.9 Ldn less than for Tuesday alone. This is not a significant difference and is made even less so by refining the calculations for Ldn at Position B. Our first report was based upon certain estimated differences between the reference Position A and Position B. By simultaneous measurements between these two positions we find the noise level differential to be 0.5 Ldn points higher than Previously estimated. This +0.5 offsets the -0.9 for a net change in calculated noise level at Position B of -0.4 Ldn from the 61 Ldn used in the previous analysis to 60.6 Ldn. As a practical matter it can be considered as no change. Wha+: will make a difference is the hours of operation. Previous analysis was based on a 24-hour• operation, but we now understand that at this time the request is to operate the carwash only until 11:00 p.m. With the night hours eliminated, analysis and comparative noise levels should be in terms of Leq (the A-welghted energy averaged equivalent noise level). 27-1. Pamaron Way, Novato, CA 94949 • (415) 883-8701 OCT-10-1990 15=23 FROM Foil Impressions TO 8429417 P.01 Mr. Wahlen Chevron Research & Technology Co. Oct. 10, 1990 Noise Analysis: Chevron Service Station Carwash Saratoga -Sunnyvale Rd. and Homestead Rd., Cupertino At Position B the daytime noise levels due to street traffic will be typically arOL:nd 57 Leq, and in the evening between 9:00 and 11:00 p.m. they are 54.1 on the average with peaks ranging from 60-73 dBA. (Note_: `loise from cars on the driveway and in the carport are not included in the Position B noise assessment. With the on -site noise included Position 8 noise would be higher.) • Carwash noise, assuming a Ryko Voyager with a ThrustPro dryer having a noise reduction pac'<age, would be 57.5 with no carport or 5-foot fence. With these features in place there will be an approximate reduction of 1 Ldn point for a 515.6 Leq at Position B fora single wash and dry. If the carwash and dryer (unit on) are on for 30 minutes each day hour, the noise level for an hour would be 53.5 Leq. This would add 1.6 Leq to the daytime 57 Ley for a combined 58.6 Leq. In the eveninll, with the unit on around 20 minutes each hour, the carwash noise level ai: Position 8 would be 51.7 Leq for an hour. This would add some 2.0 Leq points to the existing 54.1 Leq. Although the carwash operation might be audible to someone at Position•B (wits window open), the perception of an increase in environmental noise is • not oositive usually until the increase is at least 3 Leq points. Sound Walt: A high sound wall has been mentioned as a means of noise reduction. We -do not see it as a neccesity, but might be ' worthwhile to consider. /+ While erection:,of a sound barrier is an accepted method for reducing exterior noise levels, to be effective the barrier must intercept the line of sight (LOS) between the sound and receiver. In order for a sound fence at the property line to intercept the L.OS be•:ween the carwash door opening and Position B. it would have to be 114 - 14 feet in height which does not seem feasible. - OCT-10-1990 LG:16 FROM Foil Impressions TO 8429417 P.02 Mr. Wah1en Chevron Research b Technology Co. Oct. 10, 1390 Noise: Analysis: Chevron Service Station Carwash Saratoga -Sunnyvale Rd. and Homestead Rd., Cupertino A lower wall in conjunction with the carport would be a positive benei'it for the first apartment floor and of some small benefit for the upper floor, Position B. The carport has a support bAam paralleling the property line and this beam is 7'1" t from grade. The top of the carport facia is 819" t aL•ove grade. If the lower portion is effectively shielded, the • result is a sound barrier with a height of 8'9". The lower portion shield can be accomplished by erecting a 7'6" sound fence on the property tine. It'should extend westerly from the northeast corner a distance of at least 100 -Fee-, and southerly from the northeast corner a distance of 90 feet t to jas: beyond the edge of the carwash entry. For design purposes, it could extend •farther if desired and the extension could be reduced in height. The sound fence, if constructed, should be solid with no cracks or openings even at the base. Material can be earth, masonry, metal, wood, etc., or, a. combination. If wood is used, it can be of 2x boards. Base should be imbedded in earth for 3-6". The sound fence as described will provide an estimated added attenuation for the apartment project's first floor of 6-8 Leq points and 1-2 Leq point:; for the upper floor (Position B). Principal benefet from • sound wall will be a major reduction in street traffic for the first floor apartments near the wall. (*street traffic noise) Please call if there is need for further explanation or information. BDD:md Very truly yours, 46004�_ B. D. Dobbs 3 FITZROY/DOBBS Consultants In Architectural Acoustics and Noise Control B.D. DOBBS Ac—lical Society of America N.C.A.C. July 12, 1990 Karen Dennison CUSA, Inc. c/o Chevron Research & Technology Co. 2400 Camino Ramon San Ramon, CA 94583 Re: Noise Analysis: -- Carwash with Ryko Voyager - Thrustpro Dryer Chevron Service Station Saratoga -Sunnyvale Road & Homestead Road Cupertino, California Dear Ms.Dennison: The existing service station site at the northeast corner of Homestead and Saratoga -Sunnyvale Roads, two major streets, is in a high level sound field due to the heavy volume of traffic on both fronting streets. The base ambient noise level in this location is largely controlled by distant traffic -.-primarily on Highway 280 1,000 feet or so away. Adjacent to and north of the service station is Villa Camino a residential • apartment project with apartments at both first and second floors. These apartments are subject to the same street traffic noise, although to a slightly lesser degree due to distance and modest shadow attenuation for the first floor. To the east is the parking lot and then the building for the Cupertino Del Oro Club. The building does not appear to be for residential usage, but rather for meetings and social events. It is 100-150 feet from the side of the proposed carwash; and at that distance and orientation, carwash noise is not expected to be an intrusion above the typical Homestead Road traffic noise. The Del Oro Club building is approximately 40 feet from the near edge of Homestead Road. Our analysis of noise at and near the service station site has been done in relation to the "SITE PLAN", dated 12-12-88, by Chevron Corp. Engineering Technology Department for Service Station 9-5700. This plan 27-L Pamaron Way, Novato, CA 94949 • (415) 883-8701 Ms Dennison, CUSA, Inc. Chevron Research & Technology Co. Noise Analysis: Carwash with Ryko Voyager - Thrustpro Dryer Chevron Service Station, Cupertino shows the manner in which the service station will be rebuilt with the carwash located approximately parallel to and relatively near the easterly property line. The north side of the carwash (toward the adjacent apartments) is the entrance, with the exit to the south (street) side. On June 19, 1990, in the afternoon and in the evening (after 10 p.m.), noise samples were obtained at the location of the entrance to the carwash, in the general north-east corner of the site, and on the Villa Camino site between the two nearest apartment buildings and in line with the near edge • of those buildings. Based on the noise samples -- after allowing for a small degree of sound shadow attenuation (-2 Ldn points) due to fences and +1 Ldn points for 2nd floor height -- we have assessed the existing noise level exterior to the closest apartments at 58 Ldn for the 1st floor and 61 Ldn for the 2nd floor. Existing peak noise levels will vary widely, but generally within a 65-75 dBA range. Upon contact with Mark Caughey, Cupertino City Planner, we were sent an excerpt from the City's Noise Ordinance covering the portion which sets limits for noise as heard on property zoned residential. These limits are 50 dBA for Nighttime and 60 dBA for Daytime. The proposed carwash is a Ryko Voyager with a Thrustpro Dryer which utilizes a noise reduction package. • From the entrance side this is the quietest washer/dryer system of which we are aware. The attached Fig. 1 shows a sound survey of such a system with dryer held in position to produce approximate maximum noise. Actual average working drying cycles are around 2 points less at 73.6 Leq for Pos. "D". A single average wash and dry cycle will range from 120 to 160 seconds, with each operation using about half the time. At the apartment house 2nd floor a combined average wash and air dry would last 140 ± seconds at Leq 57.5 and 55.5 at 1st floor. On a 24 hour basis, assuming wash and air combined would be on 30 minutes for each day hour and on for 15 minutes each night hour, the wash and dry noise alone would be 58.5 Ldn at apartment 2nd floor and 56.6 at 1st floor. With existing noise at the 2nd floor of 61 Ldn, the wash and dry cycles under the above assumptions (58.5) would add 1.9 Ldn points to the 24-hour noise level. This is not considered to be a significant change since a change of 3 Leq points is considered to be the least change which would be noticed. Ms Dennison, CUSA, Inc. Chevron Research & Technology Co. Noise Analysis: Carwash with Ryko Voyager - Thrustpro Dryer Chevron Service Station, Cupertino The noise ordinance seems to be directed at noise which is more or less continuous, while the Leq and Ldn parameters allow evaluation and comparison of noises which have varying levels and which may be intermittent. If the degree of usage is considerably greater than the assumptions leading to the calculated noise levels noted above, there are several actions which can be taken to reduce the actual or calculated noise levels. These actions are not seen as necessary at this time, but in the event of necessity might take the form of: 1. Limiting the hours of operation -- less than 9 hours each night or day hours only -- 7 a.m. to 10 p.m., etc.; 2. At night limit use to wash only -- this is an option chosen by many people anyway; 3. Addition of perimeter sound walls up to 7 feet in height, and possibly 8 feet in some critical areas; and 4. Reducing the area (height and width) of the carwash entrance opening. Please contact us if there is need for additional information or explanation. Very truly yours, B. D. Dobbs BDD:md Attachment r i SERVICE STATION FITZROY/DOBBS 7#73 REDWOOD BLVD. a OLIVE Consultants In Architectural Acoustics and Noise Control A/O VA TO) GAL I F. 27-L Pamaron Way Novato, CA 94949 MAY I 9 9 D (41 S) 883-8701 I / RYKO CA-RWASH - VOYAGER MODEL AND T RUSTPRO DRYER WITH NOISE REDUCTION B.D. Doses \V�-V PACKAGE l� i i - b MAA t�y6' -9 �r ISX50 CARWASH LDG. A ooWASn �' iEN.DSTORAG 11 %I ART i :o TRX M(fJ(-M .a y 7j FIG 1 CART A5H DRYER CYCLE NOISE � ►u Leq GBA) SCAI-EE 1`�=20' r INDIVIDUAL TREE EVALUATIONS 110 11'r I TT L I�. � L , t� „ t Ho,f,, row and Atboticullute ✓Gv(�fll ��� 0 F_ 5S5 Sart,t Ho,a. CA 95-M, (7071 935-3911 1 ' Individual Tree Evaluations Cupertino Service Station ' Cupertino, California ' Tree #1 Schinus molle (California Pepper) Trunk Diameter: 31" Number of Trunks: 1 ' Heieht: 20' Canopy Radius: 25' Observations: • Vigor and health are moderate only; moderately defoliated; appears to be slightly stressed; structure is sound; no significant signs of decay or rot; crown development is reasonably balanced and somewhat open; significant infestation of pepper tree psyllid throughout the canopy causing the noted defoliation; also a significant infestation of black scale. Mitigation Recommendations: Recommendations include pruning to remove dead wood; fertilize to 1 stimulate growth and counteract the effects of pepper tree psyllid; spray to control black scale and psyllid. Development plans allow for preservation of this specimen. All mitigation measures described in ' Tree Preservation Guidelines should be adhered to. ' Cupertino Service Station 3/20/90 ' Page 2 ' Tree #2 Schinus rnolle Trunk Diameter: 15", 18" Number of Trunks: 2 ' Height: 16' Canopy Radius: 18' Observations: ' Vigor and health are moderate to good; structure appears to be sound and without significant signs of decay or rot; crown development is ' balanced and reasonably dense; there is a significant infestation of pepper tree psyllid. ' Mitigation Recommendations: Recommendations include pruning to remove dead wood and slightly • open canopy. Development plans do not appear to allow for ' preservation of this specimen. Further discussion may be required to establish City policy or replacement procedures. Tree #3 Eucalyptus globules (Blue Gum) ' Trunk Diameter: 24" Number of Trunks: 1 Height: 50' Canopy Radius: 25' ' Observations: Vigor and health are outstanding; structure is sound but structurally weak in some areas; no significant signs of decay or rot; crown development is balanced but somewhat heavy to the west; canopy is dense for the species; no significant signs of pests or disease. Mitigation Recommendations: ' Recommendations include structural pruning to remove weakly attached wood; thin canopy by 30% to reduce wind resistance; and remove narrow crotch lateral branches. Replacement with more suitable urban landscape trees is recommended. Tree habit and potential scale are much too large for this type of use. It appears that preservation is possible based on development plans reviewed. All mitigation measures described in Tree Preservation Guidelines should be adhered to. ' Cupertino Service Station 3/20/90 ' Page 3 ' Tree #4 Eucalyptus globulus Trunk Diameter; 24" Number of Trunks: 1 ' Height: 50' Canopy Radius: 20' Observations: ' Vigor and health are excellent; structure is sound but structurally weak; no significant signs of decay or rot; co -dominant fork occurs at approximately 12 feet; this is an inherently weak area which requires ' attention; crown development is moderately well balanced although somewhat heavy to the north side; crown is dense for the species; no significant signs of pests or disease. Mitigation Recommendations: ' Recommendations include pruning to remove dead wood; pruning to thin growth to reduce wind resistance; remove one of the two co - dominant leaders or reduce foliage on one of the co -dominant leaders by at least 30%. ' Replacement with more suitable urban landscape trees is recommended. Tree habit and potential scale are much too large for this type of use. It appears that preservation is possible based on ' development plans reviewed. All mitigation measures described in Tree Preservation Guidelines should be adhered to. 1 Cupertino Service Station 3/20/90 ' Page 4 ' Tree 05 Eucalyptus globulus Trunk Diameter: 13" Number of Trunks: 1 ' Height: 50' Canopy Radius: 12'-14' Observations: ' Vigor and health are excellent; structure is sound without significant signs of decay or rot; habit is upright and very narrow; crown ' development is open and somewhat unbalanced to the south side; no significant signs of pests or disease. ' Mitigation Recommendations: Recommendations include pruning to remove dead wood; pruning to thin growth to reduce wind resistance; and removal of one significant e+ upright leader on the south side to balance the canopy. Replacement with more suitable urban landscape trees is recommended. Tree habit and potential scale are much too large for this type of use. It appears that preservation is possible based on ' development plans reviewed. All mitigation measures described in Tree Preservation Guidelines should be adhered to. 1 1 Cupertino Service Station 3/20/90 Page 5 Tree N6 Eucalyptus globules Trunk Diameter: 53" Number of Trunks: 1 Haigh : 50' Canony Radius: 30' Observations: Vigor and health appear to be outstanding; structure is highly impacted and hazardous; central leader has broken out of this tree at a height of approximately 16 feet; significant signs of decay and rot in that area; balance of growth arises below that break and is expected to be weakly attached; significant mechanical damage is present on main bole; a significant cavity and hollow noted at ground level; large leaders have been removed, signs of decay and rot in this area; appears that the cavity already mentioned has calloused over well but a substantial amount of concrete is noted in the central bole up to at least a height of 5 feet affecting structural stability; significant fungal growth (rhizomorphs) about 10 feet in the tree at the branch attachments; these indicate decaying wood at the point of branch attachment. Crown development is balanced and very dense; no significant signs of pests or disease. Mitigation Recommendations: Extensive decay is present throughout this specimen and a significant hazard is present. Removal is recommended. ' Cupertino Service Station 3/20/90 Page 6 Tree #7 Eucalyptus globulus Trunk Diameter: 62" Number of Trunks: 1 Height: 70' Canopy Radius: 25' Observations: ' Vigor and health appear to be moderate to good; structure is highly impacted and potentially hazardous; significant decay and rot is noted; a large open cavity is noted at ground level to a 12 foot height; significant decay and dead wood noted in this area; large vertical cracks in that dead wood. Also noted another cavity at ground level on the ' opposite side of the major cavity; decay and rot are present throughout this area; substantial number of strongly smaller and strongly horizontal laterals present which may be weakly attached; crown ' development is balanced and moderately dense; no significant signs of pests or disease.. All are serious considerations in terms of stability of tree. Mitigation Recommendations: 1 Extensive decay is present throughout this specimen and a significant potential hazard is present. Removal is recommended. Tree #8 Pinus radiata (Monterey Pine) ' Trunk Diameter: 7" Number of Trunks: 1 Height: 27' Canopy Radius: 10'-12' Observations: Vigor and health are moderate only; foliage is thin; lacks vigor and color and generally appears to be somewhat stressed; structure is sound; ' no significant signs of decay or rot; crown development is very upright, narrow, balanced and only moderately dense; no significant signs of pests or disease. ' Mitigation Recommendations: ' This is not a desirable tree species and overall size is not significant. Consider replacing this tree with a suitable landscape species. ' Cupertino Service Station 3/20/90 ' Page 7 Tree #9 Pinus radiata Trunk Diameter: 10" Number of Trunks: 1 ' Heieht: 20' Canopy Radius: 15' Observations• ' Vigor and health are good; structure appears to be sound without significant signs of decay or rot; habit of the tree is somewhat leaning ' away from the project; crown development is balanced and dense; no significant signs of disease but showing beginning signs of bark beetle infestation. ' Mitigation Recommendations: This is not a desirable species and overall size is not significant. ' Consider replacing this tree with a suitable landscape species. Tree #10 Pinus radiata ' Trunk Diameter: 4" Number of Trunks: 8 Het ht: 10' Canopy Radius: 10' Observations: ' Vigor and health are poor; overall appears to be stunted; foliage is chlorotic and lacks vigor; structure is sound without significant signs of ' decay or rot and growth habit is awkward; crown development is somewhat unbalanced and open; no significant signs of pests or idisease. Mitigation Recommendations: ' This is not a desirable species and overall size is not significant. Consider replacing this tree with a suitable landscape species. Preservation is questionable due to signs of stress and awkward growth ' habit. Removal is recommended. 1 1 1 1 1 Cupertino Service Station 3/20/90 Page 8 Tree 011 Pinus radiata Trunk Diameter: 5" Number of Trunks: 1 Height: 12' Canopy Radius: 9' Observations: Vigor and health are good; structure is sound without significant signs of decay or rot; appears the central leader has been removed at approximately 6 feet and a manifold type branching system is present at that location; crown development is balanced and dense without significant signs of pests or disease. Mitigation Recommendations: This is not a desirable tree species and overall size is not significant. Consider replacing this tree with a suitable landscape species. Tree #12 Pinus radiata Trunk Diameter: 5" Number of Trunks: 1 Height: 14' Canopy Radius: 8' Observations• Vigor and health are good; structure is sound; mechanical damage noted on trunk, bark wounding and some active fungal decay lower in the bole; crown development is awkward and spindly although dense; signs of beginning infestation of bark beetles. Mitigation Recommendations: This is not a desirable tree species and overall size is not significant. Consider replacing this tree with a suitable landscape species. ' Cupertino Service Station 3/20/90 ' Page 9 ' Tree #13 Eucalyptus globules Trunk Diameter: 12", 12" Number of Trunks: 2 ' Height: 50' Canopy Radius: 20' Observations: ' Vigor and health are excellent; structure is somewhat unsound; no significant signs of decay or rot; forks at ground level into two leaders; ' both leaders lean to the east; crown development is unbalanced and heavy to the east, canopy is moderately dense for the species, no significant signs of pests or disease; Mitigation Recommendations: • Because of the weak attachment at ground level and the leaning ' nature, both are a potential hazard. Removal is recommended. 1 1� 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 TREE LOCATION PLAN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 TREE PRESERVATION GUIDELINES T l� 1'��n�.ii'!,inh ,n firi6cultw�.tnJ Arbuncu'lurr' ✓j KIKI e L�(` I'll H • 3:�5`> Sdnld Hw,i, C!1'C.10.^. 170i19353011 ' TREE PRESERVATION GUIDELINES Cupertino Service Station Cupertino, California ' Introduction to Tree Preservation ' • Great care must be exercised when development is proposed in the vicinity of established trees of any type. The trees present at this proposed construction site will require specialized protection techniques during all construction ' activities to minimize negative impact on their health and vigor. The area immediately under canopy driplines of these trees is especially critical, and for these reasons the requirements, procedures, and recommendations which ' follow have been established for short and long term tree protection. The purpose of this preservation guideline is therefore to define the procedures ' which must be followed during any and all phases of development in the immediate vicinity of these trees. ' Established, mature trees respond in a number of different ways to disruption of their natural conditions. Change of grade within the dripline or near the • root crown, damage to the bark of the tree, soil compaction above the root ' system, root system reduction or damage, or alteration of summer soil moisture levels may individually or collectively cause physiological stress leading to tree decline and death. The individual effects of these procedures ' may cause trees to immediately exhibit symptoms and begin to decline, but more commonly the process may take many years, with symptoms appearing slowly over a period of time. Trees may not begin to show obvious signs of ' decline until many years after construction is completed. It is not appropriate to wait for symptoms to appear, as this may be too late to correct the conditions at fault and to halt decline. ' It is therefore critical to the long term health of all tree species that a well conceived management program be agreed upon before implementation of ' any construction activities. Once agreed upon at the design level, it is imperative that contractors and construction personnel understand the ' Tree Preservation Guidelines 3/20/90 ' Page 2 ' importance of guidelines and their potential implications. The following guidelines are meant to be utilized by project managers and those supervising any construction in the vicinity of these trees including grading contractors, ' underground contractors, all equipment operators, construction personnel, and landscape contractors. Guidelines are presented in a brief outline form to ' be applied to each individual circumstance which occurs during development activities. It is left to the project supervisor to apply and enforce these protection measures. Questions which arise, or interpretation of guidelines ' as they apply to site activities, should be referred to the office of Horticultural Associates as they occur. ' It should be understood by all those involved in this project that by altering natural conditions around any existing, healthy tree, the potential for root damage and eventual tree decline is increased. By establishing and ' implementing carefully conceived protection specifications, negative impact on trees may be minimized, but not necessarily completely eliminated, and compromise or deviation from protection specifications will increase chances ' of tree decline or failure. The term dripline has different meanings and should be defined for use at this project. Tree dripline is defined as the perimeter of each tree canopy at the widest point from the main trunk. This traditionally is applied to the actual field condition, however, where a one-sided tree structure exists and the tree is not structurally uniform, the dripline shall be assumed to be the widest distance to the edge of canopy extending equally around tree circumference. The area below ground within the dripline is the location of only approximately 70% of the the root system, primarily in the top two feet ' of the soil surface. Tree protection guidelines are focused on minimizing • intrusion, soil cut or fill, and all activities causing compaction within this area. Site supervision should be completely familiar with this definition and these guidelines, as well as utilizing common sense when working near this critical area. ' The following guidelines will cover most circumstances which might arise during construction and will require application to the particular Ocircumstances at the development site based on the actual conditions present. ' Protection Within Dripline of Individual Trees 1.) Prior to initiating any construction activity in the area, including ' demolition or grading, temporary protective fencing shall be installed at each site tree in the immediate vicinity of construction. Fencing is to be located a 1 Tree Preservation Guidelines 3/20/90 Page 3 minimum of one foot beyond the canopy dripline. If available space and logistics allow, fence shall be placed at a greater distance or up to twice the diameter of the dripline. 2.) Fencing shall be minimum 5' height at all locations, and shall form a continuous barrier without entry points around all individual trees, or groups of trees. Barrier type fencing such as chainlink or Tensar plastic fencing is suggested, but any fencing system which adequately prevents the entry of equipment and activity will be acceptable. The use of simple post and cable fencing is not recommended as this provides minimal protection and is easily removed or moved by construction personnel. Fencing shall be installed in a professional manner with adequate uprights and appropriate attachments. Concrete footings are not required due to the temporary nature of the fencing. Any encroachment into the dripline for fencing or construction purposes should be discussed and agreed upon in advance. 3.) This fencing shall serve as a barrier to prevent dripline encroachment of any type by construction activities, equipment, materials storage, and personnel. 4.) Contractors and subcontractors shall direct all equipment and personnel to remain outside the fenced area at all times until project is complete, and shall instruct personnel and sub -contractors as to the purpose and importance of fencing and preservation. 5.) Fencing should remain in place and not be removed until all construction activities are completed. This shall include grading and compaction activities, installation of underground, all construction activities, and any eother construction or activity which is scheduled prior to landscape installation. There may be occasion when access is required, and fencing may temporarily be moved to facilitate the work. e 6.) Roots of single standing trees often extend two to three times the distance of the actual dripline and function primarily in the uptake of nutrients and water. The dripline is arbitrarily established as the minimum root area generally required to preserve tree health. As much area around the circumference of the tree beyond the dripline should have minimum intrusion to further ensure tree survival and health. iTree Preservation Guidelines 3/20/90 ' Page 4 ' Grade Changes 1.) Grade changes within tree dripline are to be minimized wherever possible. Grade should not change from that which existed prior to grading activities without approval from the project arborist. ' 2.) Maximum cut or fill within actual or estimated dripline not to exceed 6 inches. All cut activities should be done in conjunction with the project ' arborist, even those under 6", to minimize root damage. 3.) Estimated dripline is defined as the widest distance from main trunk to ' furthest branch tip applied around the entire circumference of each individual tree. This definition specifically applies to all trees where a one- sided or unbalanced structure exists and the actual dripline is not truly ' representative of the area of the root zone requiring protection. Cut and fill activities apply to this definition. ' 4.) No more than 6 inches of fill soil shall occur without specifically developed mitigation measures. Removal of soil within tree dripline is also limited to 6 inches, or a lesser amount which can be removed without i contacting major roots. Detailed mitigation is required to remove a greater amount. The amount of cut and fill is to be determined by actual tree species, rooting characteristics, soil conditions, and purpose of grade change. 1 5.) All cut and fill activities within tree dripline increases percentage of short and long term tree decline and loss, and approval of these activities, or ' compromise in this area, shall be done with full knowledge of the negative potential that is incurred. 6.) Original grade shall be maintained in immediate area of the root crown, where the soil contacts tree bole, at all times. No increase in grade shall be allowed under any circumstances in this area. 1 7.) Physical retaining structures are required where any fill operation is approved and exceeds 6 inches above original grade. Retaining structures 1 function to prevent soil grade from being raised in the root crown area. 8.) Retaining structures shall be permanent in nature and may be constructed from any material which is appropriate in function to hold raised grade away from root crown on a long term basis. Engineering may be required in some 1 instances. i i Tree Preservation Guidelines 3/20/90 ' Page 5 ' 9.) Tree retaining structures shall be installed a minimum distance of four feet from any tree trunk and may completely or partially surround the tree depending on location of grade change. If grade is raised on 50% of the ' dripline, then retaining structures must be installed to prevent that soil from moving to the immediate root crown in that area. If 100% of the grade is ' raised, structure must surround the tree entirely. It is the responsibility of the project designer to develop an appropriate structure for this purpose. ' 10.) If site conditions exist which necessitate installation of retaining structures closer than four feet to tree trunk, the project arborist shall be consulted for details of this installation. ' 11.) No part of the dry well structure shall be placed below original grade to minimize impact on root system. If necessary, structural posts may be ' • installed to hold walls in place, providing that care is taken during installation to minimize damage to the root system, and that post hole size is minimized. The excavation and pouring of footings and other structural ' support is not compatible with tree preservation. 12.) Grade changes outside the retaining structures shall be such that drainage ' water of any type or source is not diverted toward or around the root crown in any manner. Grade shall drain away from root crown at a minimum of 2%. ' 13.) If grading toward root crown is required, appropriate surface and/or subsurface drain facilities shall be installed so that water is effectively diverted away from root crown area. • 14.) Where fill is approved and/or where paving of any type is planned within the dripline, aeration tubes shall be installed from the dry well or retaining structure to the limit of the dripline and placed at a depth corresponding to slightly below original grade. A description of aeration tube use and construction follows: In all areas where paving, impermeable or semipermeable surfaces, or fill ' over 6 inches is to be installed within any tree dripline, aeration tubes shall be required to the limit of the dripline or beyond where possible. Tubes shall radiate horizontally from each dry well or the root crown area to the limit of the dripline, and shall be located on 4 foot centers. Ends of tubes shall be connected to one another. A proportional number of tubes shall be installed when partial paving or filling within dripline is required. Tree Preservation Guidelines 3/20/90 ' Page 6 ' Aeration tubes shall consist of rigid and perforated PVC pipe, minimum class 200 , styrene plastic, or molded ADS, minimum 3 inch diameter, 10 perforations per foot. Pipe shall be placed slightly below original grade. Each tube shall be wrapped in suitable filter fabric securely fastened with waterproof tape. Aeration tubes shall daylight within the retaining ' structure around tree trunk, and a grate shall be attached, but not glued, to the end of each daylighted tube to prevent the entry of debris. Aeration tubes shall also daylight near the outer perimeter of the dripline with a ' fitted metal grate properly installed slightly above finished grade. Tubes and grate shall not be installed such that water of any type or source backdrains into dry well. ' 15.) The installation of aeration tubes is meant to facilitate the normal exchange of atmospheric gasses with the soil and root system. When '. impermeable or semi -permeable paving is installed, or when soil grade is raised, this normal exchange is limited and commonly becomes a source of root damage and potential disease. ' 16.) Tree roots will be expected to grow into areas of soil fill, and quality of imported soil should be considered. Ideally, fill soil should be site soil that closely matches that present within tree dripline. If import soil is utilized it should be the same or slightly coarser texture than existing site soil, should have a pH range comparable to site soils, and generally should have ' acceptable chemical properties for appropriate plant growth. A soil analysis is recommended prior to importation to evaluate import soil for these criteria ' 17.) All approved soil cuts should be made outside the immediate dripline for minimal negative impact on trees. If approved within dripline, crown foliage . shall be reduced accordingly to balance the estimated root loss. Any ' construction activity which necessitates soil excavation in the vicinity of preserved trees should be avoided where possible, or mitigated under the guidance of the project arborist. Roots are to be hand cut and sealed wherever ' possible when major structural roots are encountered over one inch in diameter. The tearing of roots by equipment of any type within the dripline shall not be allowed. ' Tree Preservation Guidelines 3/20/90 ' Page 7 Underground Construction ' 1.) All underground work within tree driplines shall be avoided wherever possible to reduce negative impact on trees. The location of underground ' utilities well outside dripline is recommended as part of tree preservation. 2.) Weakened anchorage, root system integrity, and the ability to acquire ' moisture from the root soil areas are the most critical issues when considering any type of root impact or removal . t 3.) Underground work in the area of site trees has a potentially serious impact on tree health and tree stability. Underground trenching for a variety of utilities will sever large structural roots reducing nutrient and water uptake ' and more seriously affecting the ability of each tree to remain appropriately anchored. ' 4.) The existing root system within the dripline should not be severed by construction activities of any type. If undergrounding within dripline is required for unavoidable logistical reasons, the project arborist shall be ' consulted to determine whether the impact on tree health. 5.) All underground work required within the dripline of the trees and below ' original grade should be previewed by the project arborist to determine potential impact on trees and to prepare mitigation measures. ' Pruning Requirements 1.) The removal of dead wood, damaged branches, structurally unsound wood including bark included wood, narrow crotches, and crossing branches shall be the goal of the climbing tree worker. Co -dominant leaders or lateral ' branches shall be removed, pruned to retard growth, or cabled wherever possible. ' 2.) The removal of significant live wood is discouraged at all times. Where removal of significant wood is required to mitigate the loss of roots, careful coordination between project arborist and tree workers is required. Severity of pruning should be restricted wherever possible while still modifying unhealthy or inadequate structure appropriately. The use of drop crotching and thinning techniques to restore balance is preferred when necessary to ' accomplish pruning goals, over heading type cuts. The use of heading type cuts shall be minimized or eliminated whenever possible. 1 ' Tree Preservation Guidelines 3/20/90 ' Page 8 ' Pruning shall be as minimal as possible, removing dead or damaged branches, crossing or rubbing branches, or correcting other structural ' deficiencies which may be present. Removal of lower branches may be required to allow for access and clearance following construction Minimal ' pruning is the desired approach to all trees. 3.) The following general guidelines shall be used during all pruning ' procedures: Lateral Branch Removal tAll laterals shall be removed immediately beyond the branch bark ridge, always preserving the branch collar. ' • No stub cuts should be made which leave an inch or more beyond the branch collar. ' No flush cuts through the branch collar shall occur ' Triule Cuts All branches too large to be hand held shall be removed by means of ' the the triple cut; undercutting branch 4 to 8 inches beyond base, removing branch beyond undercut, and removing remaining stub utilizing a shoulder cut. ' Terminal Pruning Thinning Cut back terminal portions of branches by cutting back to laterals with a basal diameter 1/3 the size of the terminal being removed. ' Removal of many smaller terminals is preferred over removal of a few large ones. Size Reduction Remove portions of the crown for reducing height by removing terminals back to laterals. Each lateral remaining should be located ' to serve as a new terminal. This will establish the crown at a lower level. The diameter at the base of a remaining lateral should be 1/3 ' the diameter of the terminal being removed. Tree Preservation Guidelines 3/20/90 Page 9 ' 4.) Pruning to reduce the amount of top growth in relation to root severance shall occur on all trees where approved trenching or underground work is to occur Pruning is required to directly compensate for the amount of roots ' being damaged and removed by this work. This shall be determined after plans and construction techniques are determined. ' 5.) Pruning may also be required to create appropriate access for construction equipment where low limb presence may obstruct access. This pruning is to be done by a qualified arborist, and shall by no means be done by construction personnel under any circumstances. ' 6.) Pruning shall occur prior to initiation of any/all approved underground trenching. No ground shall be broken within the dripline of street trees without having pruning completed. ' 7.) Project arborist shall be consulted prior to initiation of any pruning procedures to coordinate activities with the working arborist. ' Additional Recommended Procedures ' 1.) Continued discussion and coordination between project arborist, owners, designers, and general contractor should occur to further discuss and define these guidelines based on the actual work planned in the vicinity of these ' trees. ' Fertilization 1.) Following completion of construction, all native trees shall be fertilized ' with a complete fertilizer which shall supply a minimum of one and one half pounds of actual nitrogen per 1000 square feet of dripline area, per year. A thorough irrigation shall immediately follow. This application shall be ' completed twice during the growing season following completion of construction. Ideally, application shall be by drenching. 2.) Following completion of construction activities a determination of tree health should be conducted to visually evaluate tree performance and to recommend additional mitigation if it should be required. Owners ' additionally should monitor visible tree appearance and contact the project arborist should tree exhibit unusual growth or characteristics. 1 ' Tree Preservation Guidelines 3/20/90 Page 10 ' Pest Control ' 1.) A close visual examination for tree pests shall be conducted by the climbing arborist as he completes pruning procedures. If a serious infestation is present which was not apparent from ground observation then pesticide ' application should be considered at that time. However, the simple presence of tree pests does not warrant the use of chemical pesticides, and it should clear that a serious infestation capable of causing tree decline must be present ' to warrant their use. The use of organic sprays or pesticidal soaps is the preferred method for treating any serious pest infestation. If infestations should occur, discussion with the project arborist is recommended. ' Weed Control ' 1.) No specific measures are recommended for weed control, and the presence of weeds should not be considered a problem in relation to continued tree health. ' Disease Control ' 1.) No specific measures are recommended for disease control unless noted in the Individual Tree Evaluations. The tree pruning specialist should note any ' serious problem during his climbing procedures if they become evident. Reference ' The use of asphalt or concrete as a primary paving surface within the canopy dripline is generally discouraged. Utilization of a permeable substance which ' does not impede the natural percolation of water or limit the nature of gaseous exchange is recommended. Materials such as decomposed gravel or cobble are ideal for this purpose, however, generally do not function satisfactorily as a parking or driving surface. Interlocking pavers come in a variety of shapes, colors and sizes and provide ' a suitable surface for driving, parking and walking. At the same time they will allow some infiltration of water and air to the original soil level. Functionally and aesthetically they are appropriate for consideration at many ' projects. Utilization of an installation method which excludes fine sand joints must be used however, to maintain infiltration. A coarse sand leveling bed and course sand joints are recommended to increase water infiltration ' and aeration. Tree Preservation Guidelines 3/20/90 ' Page 11 ' Planting Under Existing Trees ' The installation of lawn beneath established native trees is strongly discouraged. The ideal treatment under natives is the use of an organic or ' inert mulch. Redwood chips, gravel, or stone cobble are all excellent materials. If planting is required for aesthetic or functional purposes, the use of drought tolerant, woody species is most appropriate. Species should be selected for their ability to survive with minimal or no water through the summer months after initial establishment period. Only drip irrigation should be utilized within the canopy dripline to minimize summer water in ' the root zone. Nature of Work All work to date has been intended to be general in nature and comments and ' recommendations are based on obvious external conditions and symptoms. This inspection and evaluation did not include root crown excavation or inspection, nor did it include the use of instruments to determine unseen ' cavities or inherent weakness in trunk or branch structure. This inspection and evaluation did not include the climbing of each tree or inspection at that level. Underground portions of the root system cannot be viewed, and roots t have not been excavated. Structural stability, root crown health, and root health are all inferred from external growth characteristics only. Many of these trees have cavities present and this is a normal occurrence which may ' or may not affect tree health and structural stability in the future. It is the recommendation of this firm that regular annual inspections be performed to determine whether any tree on site is in a declining state and may become a hazard. Trees are living, changing organisms which can be affected by any number of environmental conditions and biotic factors beyond our control. Construction activities, even when rigidly supervised, may lead to a quick ' decline or to unseen hazards within the tree and should be considered potentially damaging to the natural balance present before development began. MEMO To: Mark From: Michele Date: August 16 ,1990 Re: Hazardous Materials I received a call today from Dave Ghiraduchi from Central Fire regarding the Use Permit application for the gas station on the northwest corner of $011inger and De Anza Blvd. He wanted to provide us with some clarification regarding the effectiveness of inventory reconciliation. Single Walled Systems 4P Inventory recorfiliation normally requested from the Planning Division however, the Fire Department feels this is not reliable and recommends requiring "vapor well test results". Double Walled Systems Inventory reconcilation is not applicable to this type of unit. Recommonds requiring the applicant verify system not now in alarm position and in working condition by providing"service/maintenance inspection invoice/report". The Fire Department would accept up to a one (1) year old report. It is preferred that as a condition of approval, no$ matter how much information is provided regarding leakage at a site that at the time of demolitian or construction that soils test be completed while the fire department is on -site. T�is will allow them to view the soil for contamination. I suggested to Dave that the Fire department conduct a training session for the planning staff regarding hazardous materials and other design concerns we should be aware of. He thought a great idea. Chevron Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 2410 Camino Ramon, San Ramon, California - Phone 14151 842-9500 Mad Milieu PO Box 5004, San Ramon, CA 94583 0804 Marketing Openmmns an.geer manage,. Ope,auaus M September 6, 1990 S L. Patterson A, 'aManage,, Up-nnns C. G Trimbach Manage,, Engma ,ng Mr. Mark Caughy City of Cupertino 10300 Torrey Ave. Cupertino, Ca. 95014 Re: Chevron Service Station (19-5700 11010 North DeAnza Blvd. Cupertino, Ca. Dear Mark, As per our telephone conversation of Tuesday, September 4, attached is a copy of the 'Soil Vapor Assessment' conducted by EA Engineering the week of September 21, 1989 at the above site. As you will see, there is a small 'vapor' hot spot near the fill end of one of the tanks. This is probably due to small amounts of spillage over the years due to product unloading operations, this is not unusual. Chevron's current plans call for a complete rebuilding of the station including the replacement of the old tanks with new tanks that will include the latest technology in tank monitoring and leak detection capabilities. While the old tanks are being removed, all soils, both excavated and in -situ will be sampled and handled accordingly. Our standard operating procedure is to remove as much contaminated soil as feasible and either treat on -site or transport to a certified land- fill. If removal of all contaminated soil is impracti.:al, in -situ remediation methods exist that are feasible to treat both the soils and if necessary, the groundwater. These cleanup operations normally take place concurrently with the modernizing of the service station facility. Impact to the public is minimal. If treatment of the soil and/or groundwater is necessary, Chevron will remediate any contamination that we have caused to the approval of both the Santa Clara Valley Water District and the Region- al Water Quality Control Board. Chevron's contacts at the above agencies are Tom Callaghan at the RWQCB, and Belinda Allen at the SCVWD. Chevron has been at the forefront of environmental cleanups at all of its ser- vice stations for quit some now and it is one thing we here at Chevron are all very proud of. If you have any questions regarding the above letter or the attached report, please feel free to call me at (415) 842-9040. Thank you for your time and cooperation. -z- cc: Mr. Bill Scudder(CHEVRON U.S.A.) Ms. Karen Dennison(CHEVRON U.S.A.) File(CPVMC-95700R1 LISTING) 9 VeC/�y�ou cA Walter F. Posluszny JrJ. Environmental Engineer Chevron U.S.A. I Barton-Aschman Assoclates, Inc. 100 Park Center Plaza, Suite 450 San Jose, California 95113 (408) 280.6600 FAX 408.280-7533 Ill 4rt1�� tiL,1� C -'"9C WE ARE SENDING YOU X'Altached f I Under separate cover via — fJ Shop drawings Cl Prints ❑ Plans Ll Copy of letter 0 Change order ❑ LEUTTEa of TMAMMIMM . the following items: ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications SEP 2 7 1990 , , 1.., ..l.li—nl IJ HNNIurN 45 :wu lllllteu l 1 For your use L-J Approved as noted As requested L] Returned for corrections IJ For review and comment I.1 I 1 FOR BIDS DUE __-_____ 19 REMARKS- n U nesubmlt copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints O PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US S—,-j*mbe (I, IRgO CTuei --sctat� 50op1e 5u-rv�ed Q.t- rc,�sh �r CHEVRON GAS AND CAR WASH SURVEY 4—(op(n We are conducting a survey for Chevron, and would appreciate your help in answering a few questions: 1) Did you purchase gasoline? L��Nes L 2 % no qy/x0 6/60 2) Was coming to Chevron out of your way, or would you normally drive by here at this time of day? -LOut of the way nLY Not out of the way 23/50 27/50 3) Where did you come from before you came to Chevron? Home � �o Work Store SOX Other 4) Where are you headed once you leave here? 2VX- Other • Home o Work � ton: 3 `� , z/511 y/50 12150 5) Are you making any other stops in between. or are you only stopping here at Chevron? '` Yes, making other stops '// No, not making other stops 2316, 2 7/50 Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 100 Park Center Plaza. Suite 450 San Jose, California 95113 USA October 5, 1990 Phone: (408) 280-6600 Fax: (408) 280.7533 Mr. R. D. Wahlen CUSA, Inc. Marketing Chevron Research and Technical Co. 2410 Camino Ramon San Ramon, CA 94583 Re: Survey Data for the Proposed Expansion of the Chevron Service Station at Homestead Road and De Anza Boulevard in Cupertino, CaUfornia 4 Ocar Mr. Wahlen: This letter is to provide background information for the trip generation data used in the report Traffic Impact Analysis for the Proposed Expansion of the Chevron Service Station at Homestead Road and De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino, California, June 1990, prepared by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. The relevant pages from the report, pages 11 and 12. are attached for reference. Three trip generation rates and reductions for passer-by trips were required for the report. one for a service station, one for a car wash, and one for a food man. The Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation manual does not have trip generation rates or passer-by reduction rates for car washes and food marts in conjunction with gas stations, so survey information was utilized from studies conducted by Batton-Aschman and other consultants. SERVICE STATION Is The fuel pump trip generation rate used in the Cupertino Chevron study was 8.5 trip -ends per pump in the PM peak hour, with a passer-by rate of 75 percent. Driveway counts were conducted at the existing service station at Homestead Road and De Anza Boulevard during the PM peak hour. The trip -ends for the service bays were subtracted from the peak -hour traffic since the service bays arc to be removed. To establish a passer-by rate for the station, survey information from a similar station in Cupertino --a Shell station survey from October 27, 1988--was used. In this survey, 78 percent of the PM peak -hour volume were passer-by trips. (See the attached DKS Associates letter, dated November 9, 1988, for more details.) Barton-Aschman's office in Evanston. Illinois has conducted numerous passer-by surveys to estimate reductions in site -generated volumes for a number of land uses. The study suggested that 70 percent be utilized to reduce the trip generation rate of service stations in the PM peak hour. (See the attached memo on Use of Trip Diversion as a Means to Reduce Site -Generated Volumes for more information.) Based on the information collected, a passer-by rate of 75 percent was utilized for the service station portion of the site. Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. Mr. R. D. Wahlen October 5. 1990 Page 2 FOOD MART The food mart trip generation rate used in the Cupertino Chevron study was 30 percent of the PM peak - hour trip-crtds for the fuel pumps, with a passer-by rate of 75 percent. The food man trip generation rate was obtained from two sources. One source was a Chevron station study conducted in Daly City in November 1988. In this study, a count was conducted at a Chevron station with a food man and another at a Chevron station without. The purpose of the analysis was to project the increase in traffic to a site by adding the food mart The survey found that approximately 25 percent of the trips to the station with the food man were food -only trips. The 25 percent food -only trips divided by the 75 percent gas/gas-and- food trips resulted in approximately a 30-percent increase in traffic due to the addition of a food mart. The trip generation rate used in the Cupertino analysis was 30 percent. (See the attached December 19, 1988, memorandum on the Chevron Station at 2690 Bayshore Boulevard in Daly City for more information.) A passer-by trip rate for the food man portion of the site was obtained from a Regal Plus gas station and food man survey conducted in April 1986, when; 76 percent of those people surveyed were passer-by trips. (See the attached Regal Plus Convenience Store Survey from April 1986 for the passer-by information.) Based on the information collected, a passer-by rate of 75 percent was utilized for the food mart portion of the site. CAR WASH The car wash trip generation rate used in the Cupertino Chevron study was 20 percent of the PM peak - hour trip-cnds for the fuel pumps, with a passer-by rate of 75 percent The car wash trip generation infor- mation was obtained from a DKS Associates study in October 1988 conducted for Shell Oil Company. Surveys were conducted at two existing Shell stations that provide car wash services to help project the impacts of the addition of a car wash in Cupertino. The study found that the number of autos washed per trip -end was approximately 20 percent. This percentage is conservative, since there is no reduction given if the vehicle purchased gasoline and then obtained a car wash. The 75 percent passer-by rate used may seem high, but since this report in Cupertino was written, another study was conducted at a Chevron station with a car wash. Barton-Aschmen Associates, Inc. Mr. R. D. Wahlen October 5, 1990 Page 3 In Pleasant Hill, California, on September 11, 1990. a questionnaire was asked of those patrons about to use the car wash. The station has refueling pumps. a food mart, and a car wash The survey results showed that 12 percent, or 3 vehicles, in the PM peak hour were solely at the station for the car wash The survey also showed that 54 percent of the patrons were passer-by trips. See the attached Chevron Gas and Car Wash Survey for more information. This equates to three new trip -ends in the peak hour that were attracted to the site solely for the car wash. In the April 1990 Cupertino Chevron study, Table 4 displays the projection of 20 PM peak -hour trip -ends. which was reduced to 5 trip -ends due to the 75 percent passer-by rate. This projection of new traffic anticipated on the surrounding roadway network in the PM peak hour is still reasonable. The five new trip -ends provide similar results to the three new trip - ends actually observed at a Chevron station with a food mart and a car wash. Chevron car washes are usually provided as a bonus for using the station to refuel, not as a trip -generation attraction. In a survey of the existing Chevron station in Cupertino, it was determined that four vehicles, or eight trip - ends, were associated with the service bays in the PM peak hour. The addition of the car wash, with five new trip -ends, is more than offset by the removal of the service bays, with eight trip -ends. Please let me know if you have any questions regarding the information used in the report A number of surveys and background information are attached as additional information. Sincerely, BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Barbara Arens Senior Associate BJA/LM 1331 • WP25:mdb 2196.21.22 4. PROJECT CONDMONS This chapter describes the project's conformance with the extraordinary use policy and project -related traffic impacts on the adjacent roadway system. Previous studies of similar land uses conducted by Barton- Aschman and DKS Associates were used to estimate the trip demand caused by the addition of a car wash and a food man to the project site. The trip generation survey of the existing site was used to determine the traffic impacts of eliminating the two service bays. . Trip Generation Survey A trip generation survey was conducted at the existing service station to determine traffic demand related to the two service bays during the PM pear hour. During the two-hour period surveyed. 14 more vehicles entered the site than exited. This can be partially attributed to the fact that most of the seven vehicles that entered the site during the last 15-minute interval were still on the site. This indicates that seven vehicles were left at the site for service during the two-hour period, or four vehicles during the PM peak hour. Therefore, four vehicle trip -ends per service bay can be attributed to the service bays. The survey results also revealed that there were 83 trip -ends per pumping position (service bay use excluded) at the existing station. In a previous study, Barton-Aschman conducted a trip generation survey of a Chevron station with a food mart. The results indicated that approximately 25 percent of the trips were related to the purchase of food only. Thus. the percentage increase in traffic due to the addition of a food man is projected to be • approximately 30 percent (25 percent food -only divided by 75 percent gas/gas-and-food). In another previous study, DKS Associates conducted a trip generation survey of two gas stations with food mans and car washes. The survey indicated approximately 20 percent of the trip -ends resulted in a car wash. Trip Generation Using the existing PM peak -hour trip rates of 83 trips per pumping position (service bay use excluded) and an increase of 50 percent due to the addition of a food man (30 percent) and a car wash (20 percent), the total number of PM peak -hour trips for the proposed Chevron development (including passerby) is estimated at 153 trips. Using the 75-percent reduction for passerby trips results in 38 trips. With an inbound/outbound percentage split of 50 in/50 out. this corresponds to 19 one-way peak -direction trips. Table 4 shows the project -related trip generation. IM TABLE 4 TRIP GENERATION Trip Purpose No. ADT Rate• ADT PM Rate PM Peak Fuel Pump 12 133 1,596 8.5 102 Food Mart 960 0*887 852 +30% 31 (s.f. GFA) Car Wash 1 108 108 +20% 20 2,556 153 (Less 75% Passerby) (1.917) (115) Total 639 38 Total one-way peak direction 319 19 Based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (1-I'E). •• ADT Rate per 1,000 s.f. gross floor area. Based on the city of Cupertino's policy that allows 16 peak -direction one-way nips per acre, the proposed development would generate 19 peak -direction one-way trips, which exceeds the maximum allowable 12 peak -direction one-way trips for the three -quarter -acre site. The site after completion of the project is projected to generate 153 trips during the PM peak hour. The existing uses on -site generate 76 PM peak -hour trips. Therefore, the project represents a net increase of •77 trips. Using the 75-percent reduction for passerby trips results in a net project increase of 19 trips, with 10 one-way peak -direction trips during the PM peak hour. Directions of Approach and Departure The directions of approach and departure of the trips added by the project are based on travel patterns in the area and on complementary land uses. Additionally, because access to the site is easiest from the south or east, requiring only right -turns in and out. 80 percent of the project traffic is estimated to approach the site from these directions. The directions of approach and departure are estimated to be: 40% North on De Anza Boulevard 10% East on Homestead Road 10% South on De Anza Boulevard 40% West on Homestead Road. -12- 1 1 1 1 • 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS for the PROPOSED EXPANSION of the CHEVRON SERVICE STATION at Homestead Road and De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, California Prepared for CUSA, Inc. Prepared by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. June 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3. BACKGROUND CONDITIONS 4. PROJECT CONDITIONS 5. SUMMARY APPENDIX NIRD/nA-6/WC:mdb 2196.21.21 PAGE 8 11 15 LIST OF TABLES PAGE Table I Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections 4 Table 2 Existing Site Traffic 5 Table 3 City of Cupertino List of Approved Developments 9 Table 4 Trip Generation 12 LIST OF FIGURES Figure I Site Location 3 Figure 2 Site Plan 4 Figure 3 Existing Site Traffic 6 Figure 4 Background Traffic 10 Figure 5 Net Project Traffic 13 I 1. INTRODUCTION ' This report describes the findings of a traffic impact analysis for the proposed expansion of an existing Chevron service station located within the City of Cupertino, California. The site is located at the ' northeast comer of De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road (see Figure 1). The proposed development would raze the existing structure, eliminating two existing service bays, and build a 960-s.f. food mart plus a car wash. In addition, the proposed development would relocate and increase the number of fuel pumps from four to six; each fuel pump would be able to service two vehicles at any one time. Access to the site would be provided by two driveways on De Anza Boulevard ' (right -turn in/out only), and one driveway on Homestead Road (right turn in/out only). (See Figure 2.) The purpose of the analysis is to determine whether the project conforms to the City of Cupertino's ' extraordinary use policy and to evaluate the impacts of the traffic generated by the proposed development on the adjacent roadway system. Staff from the City of Cupertino planning department identified the intersection of De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road to be the focus of this traffic impact analysis. ' STUDY APPROACH Conformance with the extraordinary use policy was determined by comparing the projected number of •total trips added to the surrounding roadway system to the standard of 16 one-way (peak direction) peak - hour trips per acre. The site comprises approximately 0.75 acres, which corresponds to 12 one-way peak - hour trips. The traffic impacts of the proposed development were evaluated with an intersection level of service analysis. Level of service is a qualitative measure reflecting driver perception of convenience and delay. Level of service can range from Level A, representing free -flow conditions, to Level F, representing jammed conditions. Descriptions of the various levels and their corresponding ranges of delay are presented in Table 1. Level of service calculations were conducted for existing conditions, background conditions, and project conditions. Existing conditions include existing volumes obtained from traffic counts. Background conditions comprise existing volumes plus estimates of traffic volumes from approved -but -not -constructed developments in Cupertino. Project conditions include traffic generated by the service station expansion added to the traffic volumes for background conditions. Descriptions of the three conditions and the results of the level of service calculations arc presented in the following chapters. 519 r Rnrtnn.Aest•_hmnn Aeaxnteintnsc_Int- n figure 1 SITE LOCATION awtlwvl- 0%. 111254551 04aws. = wap, alu. b W 77.1-11 -1 SITE PLAN SARATOCA - SUNNYVALE ROAD ME ANZA BLVD) SCALE I" = 10' ;F VICINITI MAP Chevron USA Inc Figure 2 SITE PLAN 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 TABLE 1 LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Average Level of Stopped Delay Service Description Per Vehicle (Sec.) A Operations with very low delay occurring with Less than 5.0 favorable progression and/or short cycle lengths. B Operations with low delay occurring with good 5.1 to 15.0 progression and/or short cycle lengths. C Operations with average delays resulting from fair 15.1 to 25.0 progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear. D Operations with longer delays due to a combination 25.1 to 40.0 of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop, and individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Operations with high delay values indicating poor 40.1 to 60.0 progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. F Operation with delays unacceptable to most drivers Greater than 60.0 occurring due to oversaturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths. Source: Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209 (Washington, D.C., 1985), pp. 9-4--9-5. -4- 1 ' 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing Chevron station is located on the northeast comer of the intersection of De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road in Cupertino, California. The existing site consists of four gasoline pumps, with each pump being able to service two vehicles at any given time. The existing structure on the site consists of two service bays and a customer area used for gasoline purchases. Access to the site consists of four driveways, two each on De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road. Each driveway permits right - turn in/out movements only. • Existing Site Traffic A trip generation survey was conducted to determine the existing traffic demand of the site during the PM peak hour. The number of vehicles entering and exiting the site were tabulated every 15 minutes from ' 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The results are presented in Table 2. The survey excluded all traffic that entered/exited the site solely for "drive -through only" purposes. ' TABLE 2 EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC ' Ins Outs Total 4:00 - 5:00 PM 34 26 60 ' 4:15-5:15PM 40 31 71 . 4:30 - 5:30 PM 39 32 71 1 4:45 - 5:45 PM 46 29 75 5:00 - 6:00 PM 41 35 76 The results revealed that 76 vehicle trip -ends occurred during the PM peak hour from 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM (see Figure 3). Due to the traffic characteristics of service stations, the majority of the 76 trips were actually diverted from the adjacent traffic flow on De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road. Therefore, the diverted traffic, also known as "passerby" traffic, is not considered to be "new" trips on the roadway system. Traffic surveys conducted by Barton-Aschman has shown that passerby trips comprise 70 percent of the total trips to/from service stations. The consulting firm of DKS Associates conducted a similar survey at a service station at the comer of Stelling Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino, California. Their results revealed a 78-percent passerby trip rate. -5- t 1Mmr#^n-Aa.-hmnn A-cz^Am*a%c& Im- N Not To Scale ------------- s'— 19 Site 4-3 APR -.-137 ,)I4-420 �. �-- 247 st— 2 k-10 I HOMESTEAD RD 144 --* ) T r 8110-11. 106 � Ha NOTE: PasmarbY Trips Account ca For Approxhnat* 75% > Of All Sift Trips am Uj Figure 3 EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC (PM PEAK HOUR) r r r r Based on these findings, a passerby trip rate at 75 percent was used for the existing site. Of the 76 two- way trips to/from the site, 57 of the trips are considered to be passerby trips and am not new trips generated by the Chevron station. This leaves a total of 18 trips that are solely destined to or from the r site. Assuming an inbound/outbound percentage split of 50/50, this corresponds to a peak -hour one-way peak -direction volume of nine vehicles. ' The City of Cupertino has implemented a policy that limits the number of one-way trips generated by a development to a maximum of 16 one-way peak -direction trips per acre. The study site, which covers approximately three-quaners of an acre, allows 12 one-way trips. Therefore, the existing development, rwhich generates nine one-way trips, is within these requirements. • Existing Level of Service rA level of service analysis was conducted for the intersection of Ile Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road. Existing PM peak -hour traffic counts illustrated on Figure 3 were used in the calculations. The result of r the level of service calculations showed that the intersection operates at LOS D-, with an average vehicular delay of 40 seconds (LOS E = 40.1 seconds per vehicle). r r r� r r r r r r -7- r 3. ' BACKGROUND CONDITIONS ' For this scenario, background traffic conditions were evaluated near the project site. Background traffic refers to the addition of estimated trips to existing traffic volumes from approved, but not yet occupied, developments in the City of Cupertino. Trip Generation, DIstribution, Assignment ' Table 3 illustrates the land use types, sizes, and peak -hour trip -generating characteristics of the approved developments. Trip assignments for the proposed developments were either obtained from previous studies ' or developed based on existing travel patterns and complementary land uses. The assigned traffic from the approved developments were added to the existing traffic volumes at the intersection of De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road (see Figure 4). Background Levels of Service A level of service analysis was conducted for the intersection of De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road. Background PM peak -hour traffic volumes and General Plan improvements to the intersection were used in the analysis. The results of the level of service calculations revealed that the intersection will continue to operate at LOS D-, with an average delay of 38 seconds per vehicle. -8 r r r rr r� _ M M s M M r r r r r ri 0M TABLE 3 CITY OF CUPERTINO LIST OF APPROVED DEVELOPMENTS AM PM Peak -Hour Trips Peak -Hour Trips Development land use Net Size In Out Total In Out Total Cupertino City Center Stevens Creek0e Anza Olfiae 340.000 s.l. 580 100 680 100 580 680 Hotel 240rms. 110 60 170 85 70 155 Grosvenor Olfice Building Tantau/Stevens Creek Otfice 143,500 s.l 245 45 290 45 245 290 Target Satellite Commercial Center Stevens Creak Blvd. Retail 13,000 s.f. 15 15 30 25 25 50 Tandem Computers Valko/Tantau c"ce 300.000 s.f. 510 90 600 90 510 600 Mariani's Residential De Anza/Homestoad Condominiums 194 d.u. 50 95 145 95 50 145 Single -Family All. 147 d.u. 35 75 110 75 35 110 Vndovich Development Stevens CreeWTone Office 45,000 s.f. 75 15 90 15 75 90 Apartments 106 d.u. 25 55 90 55 25 80 a Approved but not constructed or completely occupied (as of January 1, 1990). -9- (r r r r r r rr ter■ r r�r ■r, r r �r er ■r ■� ■r oarion-Ascnman wszwclaaca, m... re4 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC (PM PEAK HOUR) 4. PROJECT CONDITIONS This chapter describes the projectes conformance with the extraordinary use policy and project -related traffic impacts on the adjacent roadway system. Previous studies of similar land uses conducted by Barton- Aschman and DKS Associates were used to estimate the trip demand caused by the addition of a car wash and a food mart to the project site. The trip generation survey of the existing site was used to determine ' the traffic impacts of eliminating the two service bays. Trip Generation Survey A trip generation survey was conducted at the existing service station to determine traffic demand related to the two service bays during the PM peak hour. During the two-hour period surveyed, 14 more vehicles ' entered the site than exited. This can be partially attributed to the fact that most of the seven vehicles that entered the site during the last 15-minute interval were still on the site. This indicates that seven vehicles were left at the site for service during the two-hour period, or four vehicles during the PM peak hour. Therefore, four vehicle trip -ends per service bay can be attributed to the service bays. ' The survey results also revealed that there were 8.5 trip -ends per pumping position (service bay use excluded) at the existing station. In a previous study, Barton-Aschman conducted a trip generation survey of a Chevron station with a food matt The results indicated that approximately 25 percent of the trips were related to the purchase of food 'only. Thus, the percentage increase in traffic due to the addition of a food mart is projected to be • approximately 30 percent (25 percent food -only divided by 75 percent gas/gas-and-food). In another previous study, DKS Associates conducted a trip generation survey of two gas stations with food marts and car washes. The survey indicated approximately 20 percent of the trip -ends resulted in a car wash. ' Trip Generation ' Using the existing PM peak -hour trip rates of 8.5 trips per pumping position (service bay use excluded) and an increase of 50 percent due to the addition of a food mart (30 percent) and a car wash (20 percent), the total number of PM peak -hour trips for the proposed Chevron development (including passerby) is ' estimated at 153 trips. Using the 75-percent reduction for passerby trips results in 38 trips. With an inbound/outbound percentage split of 50 in/50 out, this corresponds to 19 one-way peak -direction trips. Table 4 shows the project -related trip generation. ' -11- 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1� 1 1 1 �e 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TABLE 4 TRIP GENERATION Trip Purpose No. ADT Rate* ADT PM Rate PM Peak Fuel Pump 12 133 1,596 8.5 102 Food Mart 960 '•887 852 +30% 31 (s.f. GFA) Car Wash 1 108 108 +20% 20 2.556 153 (Less 75% Passerby) (1,917) (115) Total 639 38 Total one-way peak direction 319 19 Based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). •• ADT Rate per 1,000 s.f. gross floor area. Based on the City of Cupertino's policy that allows 16 peak -direction one-way trips per acre, the proposed development would generate 19 peak -direction one-way trips, which exceeds the maximum allowable 12 peak-direcdon one-way trips for the three -quarter -acre site. The site after completion of the project is projected to generate 153 trips during the PM peak hour. The existing uses on -site generate 76 PM peak -hour trips. Therefore, the project represents a net increase of 77 trips. Using the 75-percent reduction for passerby trips results in a net project increase of 19 trips, with 10 one-way peak -direction trips during the PM peak hour. Directions of Approach and Departure The directions of approach and departure of the trips added by the project are based on travel patterns in the area and on complementary land uses. Additionally, because access to the site is easiest from the south or east. requiring only right -turns in and out, 80 percent of the project traffic is estimated to approach the site from these directions. The directions of approach and departure are estimated to be: 40% North on De Anza Boulevard 10% East on Homestead Road 10% South on Dc Anza Boulevard 40% West on Homestead Road. -12- 1L Trip Assignment ' The project -related trips and passerby trips are assigned to the driveway and roadway system based on the estimated directions of approach and departure. Figure 5 illustrates the trip assignment. Project Levels of Service ' The project -related trips and passerby trips were added to the background traffic volumes to obtain project traffic conditions. Although passerby trips do not add traffic to the road system, they do change the actual turning movements entering and exiting the driveways and passing through the adjacent Intersection. ' A level of service analysis was conducted for project -traffic conditions at the intersection of De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road. The results showed that the operating conditions will operate at LOS ' D-, with an average vehicular delay of 39 seconds. Based on the level of service analysis, the proposed expansion of the Chevron station will not cause a significant impact at the intersection. -13- r r �r �r r r r•�■■ �r r � � �r r �r �r �r rr r� ire b NET PROJECT TRAFFIC (PM PEAK HOUR) S. ' SUMMARY This analysis evaluated the traffic impacts of the proposed expansion of the Chevron service station, located at De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road in Cupertino, Callfomia. Traffic operating conditions were analyzed at the intersection of De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road for existing, background, and project conditions. The existing development generates 76 two-way trips during the PM peak hour. Based on trip generation surveys, approximately 75 percent of these trips are estimated to be passerby trips. The remaining 25 percent, or 18 trips, are estimated to be trips generated by the site. Assuming an even 50/50 split of ' inbound/outbound trips, the existing site generates nine one-way trips, which is within the maximum allocation (12 one-way trips) allowed by the City of Cupertino. Based on a trip generation survey of similar facilities, the proposed food mart and car wash are estimated to increase the project traffic by 50 percent during the PM peak hour. Coupled with the increase in the number of pumping positions (from 8 to 12), the total number of two-way trips is estimated to be 153. Using a 75-percent passerby reduction, the site may generate a total of 19 one-way trips. This will exceed ' the City of Cupertino's planning ordinance that allows only 12 one-way trips for the site. The City of Cupertino provided information for the existing traffic conditions at the intersection of De ' Anza Boulevard/Homestead Road. The level of service (LOS) analysis for existing conditions revealed that the intersection operates at LOS D-, with an average vehicular delay of 40 seconds. ' For background conditions, trips from approved but not yet occupied developments in the City of Cupertino were added to existing traffic at the intersection. General Plan improvements for the intersection were also included in the analysis. The level of service analysis showed that the level of ' service will remain at LOS D-, with an average vehicular delay of 38 seconds. New trips generated by the proposed expansion of the Chevron facility were added to background traffic volumes at the De Anza/Bollinger intersection to determine the project's impact on the intersection. The results indicate that the level of service will remain at LOS D-, with an average vehicular delay of 39 seconds, which is considered acceptable. -15- REPORT OF INVESTIGATION SOIL VAPOR CONTAMINANT ASSESSMENT CHEVRON SS 9-5700 11010 NORTH DE ANZA BOULEVARD CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA Prepared for *1 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Prepared by EA Engineering, Science, and Technology Western Regional Operations 20 October 1989 80201.02 • 80201.02 REPORT OF INVESTIGATION SOIL VAPOR CONTAMINANT ASSESSMENT CHEVRON SS 9-5700 11010 NORTH DE ANZA BOULEVARD CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA Prepared for Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 2410 Camino Ramon San Ramon, California 94583 Prepared by EA Engineering, Science, and Technology 41A Lafayette Circle Lafayette, California 94549 Marsha Gillum, B.A. Date Environmental Chemist l,--2e—Y'% Mohindar Singh, M.S. Date Project Manager Melanie Baltg-zore6 K-.S. Da Director of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology October 1989 CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Scope 1 1.2 Site Setting 1 1.3 Site History 1 2. SOIL VAPOR CONTAMINANT ASSESSMENT 3 2.1 SVCA Sampling 4 2.2 SVCA Results and Discussion 4 3. CONCLUSIONS 5 • 4. REFERENCES 6 APPENDIX A: Site Photographs APPENDIX B: Principles and Techniques of Soil Vapor Contaminant Assessment APPENDIX C: SVCA Data Sheets and Chromatograms 0 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 SCOPE At the request of Chevron U.S.A. Inc., EA conducted a soil vapor contaminant assessment (SVCA) at Chevron Service Station (SS) 9-5700 in Cupertino, California, on 21 September 1989. This report describes the investigation and presents the results. 1.2 SITE SETTING Chevron SS 9-5700 is located at 11010 North De Anza Boulevard, • Cupertino, California (Figure 1), at the northeast corner of De Anza Boulevard and Homestead Road. Land use in the area is commercial as well as residential (Figure 2). An active BP service station with underground petroleum storage tanks is located across De Anza Boulevard west of the site, and an apartment complex borders the site to the north. Recent photographs of the area are in Appendix A. The site is 200 feet above sea level, with the topographic gradient down to the northeast at 50 feet/mile (0.009) (USGS 1961). Groundwater flow is expected to be to the northeast as well. There is no surface water within a mile radius of the facility, and no school or hospital within a 1,000-foot radius. There was a monitoring well observed onsite at the north edge of the tank field. 1.3 SITE HISTORY On 15 August 1985 a routine tank test indicated a leak in the fiberglass Regular Gasoline tank at Chevron SS 9-5700. The tank manufacturer was contacted, and the tank was relined, even though no contamination was encountered and no defects were found in the c58/95700/txt 0 0 Co.. s, 'F :7162­ A*Vf*. T, IIAN 9 Tr_ !L M W'w '0 �.A S­qlh 4h SUN � LE 11 .1. 1A ii OA HOMCS CAD e;_ I oj —CITY -UK it 202 ir .z A-1 I CO, IM % 227 'shr., CZ. .7 N S w3s* 7 iPO CP .110 tj ...... 21t s 'C� ;'04 �7. C 1'4�ffl 0 �-;,PM 2 m I "N --r- EA ENGINEERING. SCIENCE. AND TECHNOLOGY. INC. 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Feet 41 Lafayette Circle Lafayette,CA.94549 Dal Figure 1. Location and topography. Chevron SS 9-5700y _ Draw ��V 0 16 11010 North De Anza Blvd., Cupertino, _R.T,�.�O/d Date California. jr/1) 1O.-Id—Pr1 r 1 U • Apartments o Apartments J m Z Q W BP Service USite Empty Cupertino Station Lot De Oro Club HOMESTEAD ROAD Shopping Vacant BMW Center Warehouse Service Facility Facility N ENGINEERING. �EA SCIENCE. AND SC NOT TO SCALE TECHNOLOGY. INC. 41 Lafayette Circle Lafayette, CA. 94549 Figure 2. Land use in the immediate vicinity of Chevron Drawn Date c 0 -/6-PI it SS 9-5700, 11010 North De Anza Blvd., � .-WO ed Date P' 0 Cupertino, California, September 1989. • s tank itself. A subsequent 90-day audit after the corrective action indicated no product loss or contamination. Monthly monitoring of the existing vadose zone well (V1, Figure 3) indicated hydrocarbon concentrations up to 375 ppm in the period from August 1986 to July 1989 (Gettler-Ryan, Inc.). A Petrotite test conducted on 3 August 1988 showed no evidence of leakage. c58/95700/txt 2 • • J 1 f O] } PUMP V19 ISLANDS VU WASTE OIL TANK LLI � I� l0 ' '•v,. STATION Cr O BUILDING IO_--lo V11' I'V10 I} $I � Vs V1 i i Ve v4 ti ' r� \ KF�F[p �r �` it rr V2 3 p I . PLANTER HOMESTEAD ROAD } Existing Monitoring Well ENGINEERING. �EA SCIENCE, AND SC NI 20 40 Feet TECHNOLOGY. INC. 41 Lafayette Circle Lafayette, CA. 94549 Figure 3. Site plan, with soil vapor sampling points, Drawq, / / Date to-[4 17 Chevron SS 9-5700, Cupertino, California, Wr Date 21 September 1989. 2. SOIL VAPOR CONTAMINANT ASSESSMENT Following a subsurface gasoline release, as free product migrates downward toward the groundwater some of the gasoline will be adsorbed to the soils and some will vaporize. In the case of a spill of sufficient volume to exceed the soil binding capacity, free liquid will reach groundwater, at which point it will float and may begin to vaporize and solubilize. On the basis of these and other physicochemical properties and behaviors of hydrocarbon mixtures, described in B.1, Appendix B, there may be vapor -phase contamination associated with any I groundwater, soil, or underground free -product contamination. The SVCA technique takes advantage of this, and through the collection and analysis of soil vapor permits rapid delineation of the extent of contamination. The SVCA is carried out according to a protocol, summarized here and described in greater detail in B.2, Appendix B: A hollow steel probe with a slotted tip is driven into the soil to a desired depth. Vapor left in the probe from the previous sample or the ambient air are purged with a vacuum pump. When the desired amount of vapor has been purged to obtain a represen- • tative sample of soil vapor, the vacuum pump is turned off and the absolute vacuum and the time for the vacuum to decay are measured and recorded. A short decay time suggests that vapors flow freely through the soil and the sample represents the vapors in the soil; a long decay and high absolute vacuum, that vapor transport is poor and that the sample is not necessarily repre- sentative of vapor constituents in the soil. The sample is injected into an HNU421 gas chromatograph that has been calibrated with known concentrations of fuel constituents, notably the aromatics benzene, toluene, xylenes, and ethylbenzene (BTXE). The elution peaks in the sample are analyzed by the gas c58/95700/txt 3 chromatograph that is coupled to a suitable detector and inte- grator, and peaks of interest are recognized and quantified by the integrator (see Appendix B for details). 2.1 SVCA SAMPLING EA carried out the SVCA on 21 September. Fourteen vapor points were driven: VI-V5 around the tank field; V6-V9 20-40 feet east and south of the tank field; V10-V13 at the ends of the pump i slands; and V14 at the waste oil tank (Figure 3). Vertical profiles were made at depths between 3 and 13 feet at points VI-V5 and V14. Vapor points V7-V9 were sampled at a depth of 13 feet, and V10-V13 were sampled at a depth of 3 feet. Hard sub- strate encountered at 12.5 feet restricted the sampling depth of V6 to this depth. 2.2 SVCA RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The results of the SVCA, from chromatograms in Appendix C, are summarized in Table 1. BTXE and total volatile hydrocarbons (TVH) were low ((12 ppm) to below detection at shallow depths (3-8 feet). However, at 13 feet at point V2, 1 ppm benzene, 8 ppm toluene, and 2,000 ppm TVH were detected. At vapor point V3, • benzene and toluene were below detection, but TVH was 610 ppm (Figure 4). At all other points at 13 feet, BTXE was below detection and TVH was low ((26 ppm) to below detection. The constituents of most samples were predominantly peaks that elute before benzene. This would indicate the presence of weathered petroleum product. Vacuum release time was low ((1 minute) at all points. Because there was free flow of vapors through soils, concentrations should be representative of actual soil vapor levels. c58/95700/txt 4 o s TABLE 1 CONCENTRATIONS OF HYDROCARBON CONSTITUENTS IN SOIL VAPOR, CHEVRON SS 9-5700, 11010 NORTH DE ANZ,A BOULEVARD, CUPERTINO CALIFORNIA 21 SEPIEKBER 1989 Sample Depth Vacuum Location (ft) (in. H4) V1/A 3 3 V1/B 8 0 V1/C 13 0 V2/A 3 2 V2/B 8 11 V2/C 13 0 V3/A 3 14 V3/B 8 3 V3/C 13 0 V4/A 3 14 V4/B 8 1 V4/C 13 4 VS/A 3 10 VS/B 8 0 VS/C 13 1 V6* 12.5 2 V7 13 0 V8 13 1 V9 13 0 V10 3 2 V11 3 10 V12 3 5 V13 3 3 Vacuum Release ( min ) Total Unidentified Volatile Peaks Prior Total Ethyl- Peaks After Hydro - to Benzenea Benzene Toluene Xylenes benzene benze�e carbons (Aom) (Pprn) (Pan) (P1m) (PPM) (tin) (2M)c <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 7 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 7 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 11900 1 8 <1 <1 61 2,000 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 6 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 6 590 <1 <1 <1 <1 19 610 3 <1 <1 <1 <i <1 3 12 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 12 7 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 7 <1 <t <1 <1 t1 <1 <1 7 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 7 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <t 4 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 4 3 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 3 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 5 <t t1 <1 <1 <1 5 <1 <1 <1 <1 t1 <1 <t <1 <1 <1 <1 t1 <1 <t 9 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 9 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 1 a. Quantification based on V-sec:ppm ratio for pentane (see text). Early peaks from blank data subtracted from sanple values. b. Quantification based on V-sec:ppm ratio for benzene (see text). c. Sunration of all detected constituents (see text). * Hard subsoil encountered at this depth. c58/95700/t1 Page 1 TABLE 1 (Cont.) Total Unidentified Volatile Vacuum Peaks Prior Total Ethyl- Peaks After Hydro - Sample Depth Vacuum Release to Benzenea Benzene Toluene Xylenes benzene benzene carbons Location (ft) (in. H4) (min) (Pan) (ppm)- (oam) (Pp ) (onn) (Ppm) (aan)c V14/A 3 2 0 2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <i 2 V14/B 8 11 0 1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 1 V14/C 13 0 0 26 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 26 BLANK DATA Total Unidentified Volatile Peaks Prior Ethyl- Peaks After Hydro - to Benzene Benzene Toluene o-Xylene m,p-Xylene benzene Benzene carbons Test Time (Pan)a (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (PPm) (PM) (prm) (oDm)C 1026 6 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 6 1246 11 0 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 11 PERCENTAGE OF STANDARD RECOVERED Ethyl - Benzene Toluene o-Xylene m,p-Xylene benzene n-Pentane n-Hexane iso-Octane Test Time (pp[n) (Ppn) (PPm) (Ppn) (ppm) (Ppm) (PPm) (ppm) 1054** 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1039 99 100 99 93 93 95 96 95 1300 97 97 94 90 90 96 97 97 1538 100 110 120 100 100 100 100 100 1918 100 99 91 87 87 100 100 100 ** Calibration. c58/95700/ti Page 2 TABLE 1 (Cont.) GASOLINE STANDARDO Total Unidentified Volatile Peaks Prior Ethyl- Peaks After Hydro - to Benzenea Benzene Toluene o-Xylene m,p-Xylene benzene benzenrcarbons Sanple_j2pn) (PPM) (gym) () (ppm) (ppin)" (R-)c .. — jppin—- Chevron Unleaded 64,000 4,900 6,200 350 1,100 310 7,400 84,000 d. Fresh gasoline sarrple (I ul of the headspace) analyzed. Page 3 c58/95700/t1 0 i J m PUMP V19 ISLAND S V12 WASTE OIL TANK W I 0 � I I :•V14 STATION Cr BUILDING Z I to I 1•— W__I•V10 I 10 vs ` kF 100 \ Fq I 9 r PLANTER HOMESTEAD ROAD Existing Monitoring Well IA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND N 0 20 40 Feet TECHNOLOGY, INC. 41 Lafayette Circle Lafayette, CA. 94549 Figure 4. Isoconcentration contours (ppm) of total volatile Drawn Date hydrocarbons in the soil at a depth of 13 feet, Chevron 10-16 - d SS 9-5700, Cupertino, California, 21 September 1989. Revi Date —/(—As • 3. CONCLUSIONS High TVH levels were found at the southeast and south edges of the tank field at 13-foot depths. Low BTXE and high concentra- tions of early eluting peaks would indicate weathered petroleum hydrocarbons. Points sampled at the south and west property boundaries (adjacent to the tank field) showed very low (5 ppm) to below detection levels of hydrocarbons. c58/95700/txt 5 C�1 4. REFERENCES API (American Petroleum Institute). 1985. Laboratory Study on Solubilities of Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Ground Water. Publ. 4395. API, Washington D.C. Associated Environmental Systems, Inc., Bakersfield, California, 93380. Precision Tank and Line Test Results. Bruell, G.J. and G.E. Hoag. 1986. The diffusion of gasoline range hydrocarbon vapors in porous media --experimental method- ologies, in Proceedings of the Joint NWWA/API Conference on Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water, Houston, Texas. Hinchee, R.E. and H.J. Reisinger. 1987. A practical application of multiphase transport theory to ground -water contamination problems. Ground Water Monitoring Rev. [Winter 1987]:84-92. Lyman, W.J., W.F. Reehl, and D.H. Rosenblatt. 1982. Handbook of Chemical Property Estimation Methods --Environmental Behavior of Organic Compounds. McGraw-Hill, New York. RWQCB (San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board). 1985. Guidelines for Addressing Fuel Leaks. RWQCB, Oakland. c58/95700/txt 6 '.,nl::#`r-.r" °.- _ k.:y.??°:r>: . _- ,.F:.:....Sy.-7!wFrt.:�¢ �S,tr _�:�'. r`-";,,'c !`°.5'`-r:.,,a;y..," APPENDIX A Site Photographs 6 r- Chevron 9-5700, Cupertino, California R' ., i' rt f L,. � �+*�51. .ate_ M�.Qi �- - __.. •�sy��!!��' , i Ado 1: Looking northeast across Do Anza Boulevard toward IF photo ite: r r sn 9 _ u Photo 2'. Looking southeast across De"Anna-Boulevard" toward site- Chevron 9-5700,'Cupertino, California to . .. own r �Y� �4��y��,YJy I'�,,�j`t: � elf ��-_� , r. , . • - ' � - " Photo 3: Looking northwest across Homestead Road toward siteW. s: frr Y �rwy� GAY' M •1 i •. ��, '. � � i -7 Photo 4: Looking west along Homestead Road from corner of site. i Chevron 9-5700, Cupertino, California Photo 5: Looking north along De Anza Boulevard from corner of site. LI APPENDIX B Principles and Techniques of Soil Vapor Contaminant Assessment • 0 APPENDIX B: PRINCIPLES AND TECHNIQUE OF SOIL VAPOR CONTAMINANT ASSESSMENT B.1 SVCA PRINCIPLES The soil vapor survey, or SVCA, technique takes advantage of the behavior of hydrocarbon mixtures and the physicochemical proper- ties of the individual components in the subsurface. Following a subsurface gasoline release, free product will migrate downwards towards the groundwater, some of the gasoline will volatilize, and some will adsorb to the soils. In the case of a spill of sufficient volume to exceed the soil binding capacity, free liquid will reach groundwater, at which point it will float and may begin to vaporize and solubilize. • Like most hydrocarbon liquids, gasoline is a complex mixture of many compounds, each with its own physicochemical properties. The contaminants found in groundwater located beneath a layer of floating hydrocarbon are generally less hydrophobic and are generally found in concentrations proportional to the hydro- carbon/water partition coefficient (i.e., the relative solubility of a given compound in the bulk hydrocarbon to its solubility in water) and to their percent composition in the gasoline. It may be noted that concentration of total benzene, toluene, and xylenes in product -saturated water may exceed 10-20 mg/L (API • 1985a). Hydrocarbons will also volatilize into the air- or gas -filled soil interstices. Volatilization is largely a function of vapor pressure. The natures of the contaminant mixtures, in terms of specific component mixtures, in either the aqueous or vapor phase, are distinctly different from each other and from the gasoline. That is, the more hydrophilic hydrocarbons will be more likely to move into groundwater, while the more volatile compounds are more likely to move into the vapor phase, and the compounds that are both less volatile and more hydrophobic are more likely to remain in the free product or be adsorbed to soils (Hinchee and Reisinger 1987). c58/95700/appb B-1 Hydrocarbons not remaining in the free product will partition into either groundwater or soil vapor and migrate as the result of a variety of interacting forces. In groundwater, contaminants will migrate with the groundwater flow, interacting with the rock or soil geological medium. As the contaminants pass through a medium, organic constituents in the medium interact with the contaminants, and some are adsorbed or bound to particle surfaces (Bruell and Hoag 1986). The result is a net retardation in the velocity of movement of those compounds relative to that of the groundwater in which they are dissolved. The process is analogous to laboratory chromatography. The compound with the least affinity for the porous medium is least retarded and there- fore moves most rapidly. This compound, then, is present at the Oleading edge of a contaminant plume. The affinity of a compound for the soil porous medium is partly a function of the compound's hydrophobicity --that is, the more hydrophobic a compound the more likely it is to adsorb to the solid medium. Aqueous solubility is a good indicator of hydro- phobicity: the more soluble a compound is, the less hydrophobic and more hydrophilic it is, and vice versa. Vapor pressure is a good indicator of volatility; compounds with higher vapor pressures are more volatile. • In determining the environmental fate of various hydrocarbon compounds in a hydrocarbon mixture such as gasoline, those which have a high vapor pressure are more likely to move into the vapor phase, or evaporate. Compounds with high solubility are more likely to move into groundwater from the free product and, once in groundwater, tend to move more rapidly. Compounds of low vapor pressure and low solubility tend to remain in the free product or be adsorbed to the solid matrix and remain relatively immobile. c58/95700/appb B-2 Dissolved compounds will tend to volatilize from the aqueous phase. The Henry's Law constant is the equilibrium ratio of a compound's concentration in the vapor phase to its concentration in the aqueous phase. The higher a compound's Henry's Law con- stant, the greater its tendency to volatilize from water into air. Figure B-1 graphically illustrates the vapor pressure, aqueous solubility, and Henry's Law constants, and their relationships, for selected hydrocarbons typically found in gasoline. The Henry's Law constant is approximated here as the ratio of vapor pressure to solubility. • The Henry's Law constant is directly related to the tendency of compounds to volatilize, as opposed to solubilizing. Compounds with Henry's Law constants greater than 0.001 (atm' m3/mole) volatilize from water into air very rapidly (Lyman et al. 1982); those with Henry's Law constants greater than 0.01 (atm' m3/mole) are generally volatilized so rapidly that they are seldom found in gasoline -contaminated groundwater. it may be observed (Figure B-1) that tetraethyl lead (TEL) has an extremely low solubility and a relatively low vapor pressure. As a result, this constit- uent would not be expected to solubilize and migrate in ground- water, and although its low vapor pressure would indicate slow • volatilization, its Henry's Law constant indicates that it may be more rapidly volatilized than solubilized. The fate of TEL would be expected to be long-term binding to the soil. On the basis of these properties it can be seen that associated with any groundwater, soil, or free -product contamination is vapor phase contamination. The SVCA technique takes advantage of this, and through the collection and analysis of soil vapor permits a rapid, cost-effective delineation of the extent of contamination. c58/95700/appb B-3 0 • H = Henry's taw Coefficient 100 (atm • M3/mole) r°o• propylene ddj d(9 P i tane • N d) � n-butane• L ( n I•pentane 0 1.0 • d chloromethp o E n•pent� • / Tm c0 OO cycbpentanc •wrbondisulli -dimothylbutano CE• N m� n-hexano• mothylgcbpen o acetono •isopssopyblher ` tl • • TCE • • •Ehbrolorm dimethylpenta s b zone* n. 0.1 molhylhexanes uichlen thane •dichloroolhane N �0 eimethylpentane •PCE •toluene t-butylmethyl 1 cr• thylodanes � � elhylbenzenc •1.2-d�bromoeth,� e 1 0.01 • ���eaet� �o •jxylenes 4 �ecQp� rxreasinWy Mobile nGround Water DB P 0.001 .� d' rbenzone OO.� • OHO •tetraethyllead 0.001 0.01 0.1 1.0 10 100 1000 Aqueous Solubility (m mole/1) Figure B-1. Vapor pressures, solubilities, and corresponding CIENCE,AND G Henry's Law constants of selected volatile IM TECHNOLOGY. INC. chemicals. 41 LAFAYETTE CIRCLE LAFAYETTE. CA. 94549 B.2 SVCA TECHNIQUES To collect and analyze soil vapor sample, a hollow steel sampling probe with a slotted tip is driven into the soil to a specified depth below ground surface and a vacuum pump is attached to purge approximately five probe volumes of vapor. Purging vapors from the probe ensures that the sample of vapor taken at this depth is not contaminated by vapors collected higher in the section and that the sample represents vapor in the soil at that depth. Purging requires between 1 and 20 minutes. A vacuum gauge on the sampling apparatus (Figure B.2) measures the vacuum between the tip of the probe and the pump. After the appropriate purging period, a valve is closed and the vacuum in the probe decays. • The vacuum reading during the purge and the vacuum release time are recorded on the SVCA data sheet. In general, the soil's gas permeability is indicated by the vacuum release time and the vacuum during purge. A short vacuum - release time suggests that soil gases flow freely through the vadose zone to the probe; a long vacuum release time indicates a high resistance to soil gas transport, which may result in a hydrocarbon concentration measurement that is below the actual level. In most situations, vacuum release is rapid (within three minutes), and the sample is considered to be representative of • the soil vapor at the sampled depth. The samples are collected through a septum with a microsyringe and injected into an HNU 421 chromatograph for analysis. The HNU 421 is a laboratory -size, temperature -programmable gas chromato- graph equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID). The hydrogen -air flame ionizes compounds, generating an energy increase in the detector, which appears as an electrical signal. vapor samples are injected into the gas chromatograph, separated on an analytical column, sensed by the detector, integrated, and reported as individual compounds on chromatograms. The instru- c58/95700/appb B-4 u 100m1 microsyringe septu (saml hollow probe slots pump EA ENGINEERING. SCIENCE. AND Figure B-2. Schematic diagram of soil -gas sampling apparatus. IBMTECHNOLOGY. INC. 41 LAFAYETTE CIRCLE LAFAYETTE. CA. 94549 ment is operated isothermally at 57 C and the capillary column flow rate is 10 ml/min. These conditions ensure peak retention time stability and prevent contaminant buildup within the column. Blanks and standards are run every 6-8 samples to verify that the system is free of contamination, and to ensure system reproducibility. The chromatograph yields a response in the form of an electrical signal, measured in volts; this is recorded and integrated across time by a Shimadzu C-R3A integrator. The peak area is expressed as volt -seconds (V-sec). The instrument is calibrated with a multicomponent standard consisting of 9.6 ppm benzene, 9.3 ppm toluene, 9.4 ppm o-xylene, 17.7 ppm m,p-xylene, 9.5 ppm ethyl - benzene, 9.2 ppm n-pentane, 9.5 ppm n-hexane, and 9.4 ppm iso- octane. During calibration the integrator calculates and stores the response ratio, V-sec:ppm, for each constituent. That ratio for each component of the standard is used to quantify the concentrations of identifiable vapors in field samples according to their V-sec values. The concentrations of unidentified compounds are calculated in a similar manner. In the table describing the results of the assessment, the column entitled "Peaks Prior to Benzene" repre- sents the sum of the responses in V-sec for all peaks eluting 40 prior to benzene, proportioned to the calibrated V-sec response for pentane. Similarly, the column entitled "Unidentified Peaks after Benzene" represents the sum of V-sec responses for unidentified components which elute after benzene, proportioned to the V-sec response for iso-octane. The column entitled "Total Volatile Hydrocarbons" represents the sum of all detected components (ppm). c58/95700/appb B-5 Citt4 of CNperti"o 10300 ln,w Awn— P.O. 11u. Uki Cuh•nlnu, CA 95014-3255 Cupvllino, CA 95015.OSM mr4•phunr: 14001 252-4505 W. 1400I 2S2.0753 COMMUNITY DTYI LOMUNT August 17, 1990 Chevron Research & Technology P.O. Box 5045 San Ramon, CA. 94583-0945 Attn: Karen Dennison I* SUB=: Application 17-U-90 This letter is intended to notify you that the subject application is incouplete, and that further processing thereof has been suspended until the following information is received and verified for adequacy: 1) Supplement to Environmental Initial Study checklist describing the type, number and location of underground fuel and oil storage tanks, their age, and indication if they are to be replaced or maintained. 2) If the tanks are of a single wall type, a vapor well study will most likely be required prior to recammendation of a negative declaration. If the tank is of a double wall design, a servioe/maintenance inspection invoice/report will be needed to • verify that all detiction and alarm equipment is in working order. Please contact me before 4hurdsay's Bnvironmlental Review Cmdttee meeting to ascertain a schedule for filing this additional material. M4 • •� T3y;iY•:;�. i Mark Caughey, AICP City Planner ._w --..aw_a.rcc•�+10-0.. -�ovH mug z1'Vo '17z no.vol r.v1 cncwRo^ von we nnT:• FACSIMILE. COVER SHEET r.:'•CheVron CUSA MARKETING* WEST. CENTRAL REGION SR-2410 CAMINO RAMON MAIL ADDRESS: CHEVRON O.S.A., INC. P.O. Box 5004 DATE; San Ramon, Ca. 94583-0804 (street: 2410 Camino Ramon ) 8 - z l ' C10 TO: Name of Person, Company, Address, Facsimile Number (If Availabl M AR), 606H6iy 67V 4, C,,PrR771lD. C/7Y / l A.JN6-R rl: VVALT CoeVP,o" U.S.A. SAO RArAo j, CA. FAX NUMBER M?- - 0765 3 A2--A (4CO � COOE ------RM.NO,/BLDG._ SRfo`.L14z.� OBJECT: CyE_/RVAI JCS ALE -�047100'j 0 /'__5%OC )P6W � ^ .�i�16 ///� IW6-MNV6 ScA95VdI&-b /asp WE I)Eyo 7a !lNol-, uJNA r TVF6 & o f Vo' A)&ED 7D M4045 APJ&WiM3U so "6. CAAJ SO" Tiu6 "'040P.¢/' FaKkaG - R6Vg0A1dk?r. To 7WG- ,WeW'71N6- pzp'ssfi e771&x CACI_71 MIE- Ar L'4j5) 6+2--9040 C/F T.M Nor ' i4~, pi-e4a • 4GA0tF'q De-MILGn Alc5S•A&C-) OR FA- Me '/ouR 40Es'T7vN.S, YOUR PROMPT n'r7l'DIV�� —1Ei AyrxWL1ATsrD. 'rpft/JK • Y-O-V NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET If transmission is interrupted or received incomplete, please Reply by Facsimile - Dial: (!()rj) contact ORIGINATOR at phone number 4 1 5) 8 4 2^ 9 5 9 1 OR eAZ-C1G54 indicated above. �� 44sbe OPERATOR: TIME: DATE:____.... -CNFIRM-ED BY: - - TIME: DATE. 1 Cupertino De Oro Club P.O. Box :161 , Uiperlino, California 95015 As from (415) 948-4947 SLP .{ 1990 Mr. Tom Robillard, Planning Department, City of Cupettino. 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino. CA 95014. Dear Mr. Robillard: I am enclosing copy of a letter to the members of ASAC concerning the eucalyptus trees on the Club - owned site to be developed by Chevron. The Club would appreciate receiving notice of any meetings or hearings concerning this property, including ASAC. Since the Club building is not always open and has no mail slot, all correspondence should be addressed to: Cupertino De Oro Club P.p.Box 361, Cupertino. CA 95015, Thank you, 1Q'� av✓� ' Il Ny'�ywu�1 Doris Hijmans, Chairman. Standing Committee on De Oro Properties. Culwrtinu De Oro Club 6 , i 990 I'.0) Buy 361, 0i1wrlim), California 45015 As from: (415)948-4947. Sept. 4. 1990 To the Members of the Architectural and Site Approval Committee: City of Cupertino, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino. CA 95014. ASAC A lication 17-U-90 ron ev- Cupertino De No Club With reference to the Staff report which was to have been • considered at the August 27th postponed ASAC neeting, we would like to put the following on record: The eucalyptus trees which are a matter of concern to the Planning Staff are also of concern to the Club members, although for different reasons. In March Chevron requested the De Oro Club's permission to remove one of these trees in order to move the planned car wash further away from the apartment building; this permission was given by the Clyb subject to City approval. The trees in question may have been part of the original planting of the old Collins School site and consquently are circa 100 years old. (Cupertino Historical Society.) From time: to time over the years the:trees have been trimmed and treated for fungii and other pests. However, • a recent arborists report confirms that both trees are now hazardous and decayed and recommended that they be removed. Club members are concerned about the possible hazard of heavy branches falling during a storm and the trees have obviously been stressed by the four years of drought. As far as aesthetics are concerned, we appreciate the City's wish for a planting to set off the historic Club building. When the final plans for the Chevron station remodelling are approved and when the planting time is appropriate, the Club plans to landscape the area between the station and the De Oro -parking -lot. Such landscaping will most likely include native trees but perhaps not the Monterey pines which have not done well in this area. (Several the Club planted have died during the past ten years and the remaining trees are not in good shape.) Cupertino De Oro Chib 11.0. Box 361, Cupertino. California 95015 9/4/90 ASAC 2 In addition, there are three younger 50' high eucalyptus growing closer to the apartment buildings and although not ideal trees, they will remain in place together with other trees to be planted by Chevron. As it has since 1921, the Club will continue to maintain and do whatever is necessary to preserve the several a live oaks, Torrey pines, tan oak, Coulter pine and other native trees planted on the grounds. Under the circumstances, we hope that the Planning Staff will reconsider their objection to the removal of the old trees and we would welcome any suggestions ASAC and/or the Planning Staff may have concerning future plantings on this side of the Clubhouse. Doris Hijmans. Chairman. Standing Committee on De Oro Properties. CC Tom Robillard, Planner II August 8, 1990 Mr. Robert Cowan Community Development Director 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Ref.: Applications No.(s) 17-U-90 and 25-EA-90 Dear Mr. Cowan: Thank you for the opportunity to review the proposed redevelopment of the service station on the corner of Homestead Road and De Anza Boulevard. This office has reviewed the application and recommends an 8 foot high masonry wall along the property lines adjoining residential uses. The wall should mitigate any potential noise, light and glare Impacts from the proposed car wash and service station. . If you have any Auestions, feel free to call me at (408) 730-7444. Planner OS:ms L'Llijit;,i•a��y t? AUG 10 1990 ADDRESS ALL MAIL TO: P.O. BOX 3707 SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA 94086-3707 For deaf access, call TDD/frY (408) 730.7501 CUPERTINO SANITARY DISTRICT SANTA CLARA COUNTY DISTRICT MANAOER•ENOINEER 200ES STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD. BLDD C BOARD OF DIRECTORS MARK THOMAS A CO. INC. CUPERTINO, CA 96014 CURTIS EL HARRISON. ..� DISTRICT COUNBEL 1A091 2BS-T0T1 DR JOSEPH F. BROWN rrn RICHARD A FELLOWS PHILIP D AS AV OF ROY M. RUSHTON S TURa IS. NESS. BRUNSELL A WENDELL H. KERR. JR SPERRY Department of Planning and Development City of Cupertino • P.O. Box 580 Cupertino, CA 95015 Gentlemen: August 9, 1990 File: CuSD - MOP Planning Department (Cupertino) Re: Application Nos. 17-U-90 and 25-EA-90, Karen Dennison, Chevron Station, 11010 No. De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino (APN 309-42-037) The existing building is connected to the Cupertino Sanitary District sanitary sewerage system. Due to the change in use, payment of Additional Commercial Density Fees shall be required in accordance with Chapter VIII, Section 8203(b) of the District Operations Code. s WEMc:lw I.�i9st6i7�i�5 �L6�piioBE�iZS'a' AUG 10 1990 Yours very truly, MARK THOMAS & CO. INC. District Manaqer-Engineer by William E. McBee SUPPLYING SANITARY SEWERAGE SERVICES FOR: CITY OF CUPERTINO. PORTIONS Of THE CITIES Of SARATOGA. SUNNYVALE AND LOS ALTOS AND SURROUNDING UNINCORPORATED AREAS Sonia CloraVdley Woter District 5750 ALMADEN EXPRESSWAY SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95118 TELEPHONE (408) 265.2600 FACSIMILE (408) 266-0271 AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER September 7, 1990 SLI' 1 Ll i9yU Mr. Robert Cowan Director of Community Development City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Subject: Use permit application to reconstruct Chevron Station, Pile 17-U-90 sent to us on August 7 The site would not be subject to flooding from a District facility in the event of a 1% flood. Proposed land use change would not directly affect any District facility, If site drainage is to be directed into a District facility, detailed plans should be sent for our review and issuance of a permit prior to start of construction. District records indicate there is one monitoring well on the site. In accordance with District Ordinance 90-1 the well should be either maintained or abandoned in accordance with District standards. Property owners or their representative should call Mr. David 2ozaya at (408) 927-0710, for information regarding disposition of the existing well. Eugene Sullivan Supervisor, Permits Section Design Coordination Division cc: Public Works Department City of Cupertino Cupertino Planning Department eM 4 AmVon Joo-Tornel l F DFM CENTRAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT SUBJECT Cnevron 3071 DRIFTWOOD DRIVE 17-U-90 • 25-EA-90 / 11010 N DE ANZA BL � .«� SAN JOSE, CA 95128 SERVICE SINCE 1947 (408) 378.4010 MESSAGE DATE 08 24 / 90 1. Submit building plans and hazardous materials storage plans to the Central Fire Protection District. 2. Submit plans for removal 'of existing tanks. Plans shall be forwarded to Central Fire District's Hazardous'Materials Specialist David Ghllarducci. TVT:jg do SIGNED Form 124 01461 Pat—ons 0+= f71r fog 4r�-mRric TO AIMTCTy's F`C i? (G1i Ro�`�,l�i 1�cerr_lpq lia[f t!Ac! Cent--&l Fi_-e Dist:ic-m a.Ter_:ro Sanity f Di. iCC ✓ Cautr/ wac ar DL"tric-- Ccynrf Fealth Ctcar=ent Cautrf CammuucationS Off. P.C.L?. Ntc: Lu'^f Errjlard Pacific Tv lephcne (2 c:Vies) cj; rtino School Di.-cricz Fremont Union High School • EAAC3-M Ms. SaLly Freadhan Foothill Coamautibf College Dist. San Jose Hates Works California Water Service 0*ertino Water 0.-parI=-= Federal Housing Administration Liter•-Discrict Plannirrf co rcil V"EAs Altos Carbage Company Santa Clara Co. Sheriff (2 copies) Eteighborttood/fia�aimers Assoc. '�"'^'r"� :rrnr rtEW APofTc TTCNS Tt3pnr/ Rrmnn�..n Reply Service Special Ca®ents Act h A S.'+� .Jch Ren I city of Cupertino Post Offieo M dpeniruada. Open Space District United Cable TV Crop. Sat Jose Heluuy-Veus P�mtiltvla Times Tribtmte O*ertino Courier wrr•.wwww�nrsr*wasrwwwirrr+rrtwwtrwwrr rwos*twwfiwwwrwf fwf wwwwwr+rwr rww*fwrrr rwa r rrr f w r rf r r r r rrrw rr s•• r r r r• Fhlerl tx t4 tie say..;�is near 0 ity, attwr City, cr preseWptop-sed State Agency, Sergi to: �•at.p . •. •;}-.y'.. taboa nat�al17 ^�e, o:.)aL� _.._ Camrty VLaMirxl Dept. Comity Asssasor's Office MpaLtmont of +zmcrperzation LEGAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC iUWM4G BEFORE THE PLANNING OCM IISSION OF TM CITY OF CUPERrINO, CALIFORNIA on the Sth day of October, 1990 at 7:30 PM in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue is hereby given. The following applications for action by the Planning Commission will be heard: 1. Application No(s): 11-U-90 and 19-EA-89 Application: sobrato Development Conmanies Property owner: Sobrato Interests II Location: East side of North De Anza Blvd between I-2S0 and Mariani Avenue Parcel Area: 32.5 Acres USE PEMIT to demolish 564,000 sq. ft. of irxlustrial building space and construct 785,000 s.f. (net) of office space with related site irprovements. ENVIRONM MAL DErERKINATION: Negative Declaration recamnended 2. Application No.(s) 17-U-90 and 25-EA-90 Applicant Chevron Research/Tec^hnolary Co. • Property owner Cupertino De Oro Club Location Northeast corner of Homestead Road and De Anza Blvd. USE PERM to demolish existing service station irprovements and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 5,700 s.f. of Wilding area erxxxtipassing a food market and car wash, with related site irprovements. FNv.TmmaTrAL DErEmn2 MON: Negative Declaration recc mnended 3. Application No(s): 1-GPA-90 Update of the Housing Element Applicant: City of Cupertino Location: CiU-wide Review and update of the background data and policies of the General • Plan Housing Element; public hearing to evaluate the scope of issues and information necessary to accomplish the Element update process. ENVIPDNMEWAL DErEMI1NATION: Not omplete If you challenge the action of the Planning Commission in avert, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Cupertino at, or prior to, the public hearing. Date of Publication: September 26, 1990 legals/1n10-8 min i FI-04 p CCU 109 -A e Anz Blvd. C r 9 1 6t . 0 4ft -90 1% lOVJO inuP. A+enue Cupcnin0, CA1011 is 9SO14 'Irlaphune: 140111 M.4su: PLANNING o1PARTmrNT Citvf of Ctircrtimo i P.O. not Ida Cupenlno.CA lmni+4Su1S FAX TRANSMITTAL I . TO: ME Mt:wos D E P T & TITLE: T- ' THEIR FAX NUMBER: -415' 04Z 8305 DATE:, 9'19 NUMBER OF PAGES TO FOLLOW: 1 FROM: _ M/`Kk Gil k-=jI-IEY DEPT & TITLE: OUR TELEOHONE NUMBER: (400) 252-4645 OUR FAX NUMBER: (408) 252-0753 CITY OF CUPE MNO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 252-4505 To: Dorothy Cornelius, City Clerk From: Deparnent of Community Development - Planning Division Date: March 11, 1991 Subject: REFERRALS FOR CITY COUNCIL. AGENDA OF March 18, 1991 PUBLIC HEARING: 1. Application No.(s) 17-U-90 and 25-FA-90 Applicant Chevron Research/Technoloav Co. Property Owner Cupertino De Oro Club Location Northeast corner of Homestead Rd and De Anza Blvd USE PERMIT to demolish an existing service station and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 1,500 s.f. of building area e =u assing a food market and car wash, with related site improvements. (Continued from Planning Comm. meeting of 02/11/91) ENVI1206MWrAL DETERMIMTION: Negative Declaration recommended REOOH40,1DATION: Approve with Conditions New Business Approval of the Scope of Consultant Services for the Urban Design Element of the General Plan, i.e.: "Grand Boulevard" Consent Calendar 1. Application ASAC 3-U-90 - Crouton's Inc. Requesting review and approval for roof mounted mechanical equipment screening at an . existing restaurant. The site is located at 10100 S. De Anza Boulevard, southeast corner of Cali Avenue and De Anza Boulevard. RECOMMENDATION: Approve with Conditions Robert Cowan CITY OF CUPERTINO NEGATIVE DECLARATION March 18, 1991 As provided by the Enviraunental Assessment Procedure adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1973, and amended on March 4, 1974, January 17, 1977, May 1, 1978, and July 7, 1980, the following described project was granted a Negative Declaration by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on March 18, 1991. KLO-WLSIANUBo. r• • • �i • Application 25-EA-90 Application No.(s) 17-U-90 Applicant Chevron Research/Tecinnology_Co. Property Owner Cupertino De Oro Club Location Northeast corner of Homestead Road and De Anza Blvd. USE PERMIT to demolish existing service station improvements and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 1,500 s.f. of building area er=npassing a food market and car wash, with related site inprovements. FINDINGS OF DECISIQRZ1g 9 BODY The City Council granted a Negative Declaration since the project is consistent with the General Plan and there is no significant environmental impacts. Robert Cowan Director of Conumity Development rq"—V.4m• 1 MMY M p•1 This is to certify that the above Negative Declaration was filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on , 1991. City Clerk erc\neg25ea 4 CITY OF CUPERTINO Department of planning d Development 10000 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA. 95014 (408)252-4642 retttYe � r� en Staff USI On:•i:; .._ EA rue No. - L( , C Case File No(s). _L1_____�—___ PROJECT DESCRIPTION Attachments? -- -- — PROJECT TITLE Chevron Service Station 9-5700 PROJECT LOCATION De Anza and Homestead Roads PROJECT DESCRIPTION Remove existing underground tanks and above ground buildings, and construct new service station with a car wash. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Existing service station includes grove of diseased and giving trees. PROJECT STATISTICS Site Area (ac.) .8 Building Coverage .8 % Exist. Building 2464 s.f. Proposed Bldg. 5700 s.f. ?one C-G GP Designation Assessors Parcel No. 309 •-__ It Residential, Units/Gross Acre Applicable Special Area Plans: (Check) Total No. Rental? 113edroomis Total s.f. Price Q Monta Vista Design Guidelines UNt Type.aY1 Q N. De Area Conceptual Unit Type #2 Q S. De Anza Conceptual Unit Type #3 Q S. Sara -Sunny Conceptual Unit Type #4 Q Stvns. Crk. Blvd. Conceptual Unit Type #5 Stvns. Crk. Blvd. SW 8 L'scape If Non -Residential, Building Area 5700 s.f. FAR 17 Max. Employees/Shift 2 Parking RequUed_ Parking Provided 5 Project site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area Yes No- i IMPACT YES WILL THEPROJECT... � SOURCE Na s.o,,,rom Sandon, runWaa„ SpNianl (►4t94wn (No Pmpowl 144gauon PMPouo) A) LAND USE/GENERAL PLAN 1) Require a change from the land use desgnation for ® 0 0 0 the Subject site In the General Plan? 1,708 2) Require a change of zoning? 0 0 0 16,18 3) Require a charge or variance from an adopted rr�1 sp,it.cific plan other adopted policy statement? 17.18 4) Result in substantial change in the present land use ® 0 0 0 0 of the site or that of adjoining properties? 7, 12. 6) Disrupt or divide the physical configuration of an ® 0 0 0 0 established neighborhood? 7, 12, 23.42 7) Conflict with established recreational, educational. ® 0 0 0 0 religious or scientific activities in the proles vicinity? 7.12,16 e) GEOLOGIC/SEISMIC HAZARD 1) Be located in an area which has potential for major rv� n 0 geologic hazard? r 2,14 2) Be located on or adjacent to a known earthquake 0 0 0 fault? 2,14 3) Be located in a Geologic Study Zone? Q 0 0 0 2 4) Be located in an area of soil instability (subsidence, landslide, shrink/swell, soil creep or severe ero- 0 0 0 sion)? 2, 5, 10 5) Cause- substantial erosion or siltation of a water- ® 0 0 0 0 2, 5, 10 course? 6) Cause substantial disruption, displacement, com- paclion or overcovering of soil either on -site or off- ® site? 0 0 0 2, 14.41 7) Cause substantial change in topography or in a ® 0 0 12,41 ' ground surface feature? 8) Involve construction of a building, road or septic ® 0 0 � 0 6, 12. 41 system on a slope of 10% or greater? C) RESOURCES/PARKS 1) Increase the existing removal rate. or result in the removal of a natural resource for commercial put - poses (including Items such as rock, sand, gravel, ro, trees, minerals or topsoiq? [ n � 5. 10 2) Result in the substantial depletion of any non-renew- ® 0 0 0 0 5 able natural resource? 3) Convert prime agricultural land (Class I or it soils) to non-agricultural use or impair the agncutlural pro- ® 0 0 5.35 ductivity of nearby prime agricultural land? J) Involve lands currently protected under the William- 0 5.18 son Act or any Open Space easement? 5) Substantially affect any existing agricultural uses? ( Q Q Q 7.16 4 CITY OF CUPERTINO Department or Plannfnp a Devebprwnt 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertno, CA. 95014 (4061252-4642 WI x'�% 1".sf,",q?+�`i�`�'�t�l�'VSegQ(l.•I'. �fy..; ylrx;` EA File No. Case File No(s). PROJECT DESCRIPTION Attachments? -- -- PROJECT TITLE Chevron Service Station 9-5700 PROJECT LOCATION T)e Anza and Homestead Roads PROJECT DESCRIPTION Remove existing underground tanks and above ground buildings, and construct new service station with a car wash. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Existing service station includes grove of diseased and dying trees. PROJECT STATISTICS Site Area (ac.) .8 Building Coverage .8 % Exist. Building 2464 s.L Proposed Bldg. 5700 s.t. Zone C-G GP Designation Assessor's Parcel No. 309 •_12_-_17 If Residential, UNts/Gross Acre Applicable Special Area Plans: (Check) Total No. Rental? Bedrooms Total s.f. Price [_� Monla Vista Design Guidelines Unit Type.#1 N. De Anza Conceptual Unit Type #2 0 S. De Anza Conceptual Unit Type #3 0 S. Sara -Sunny Conceptual Unit Type #4 0 Stvns. Crk. Blvd. Conceptual Unit Type #5 Stvns. Crk. Blvd. SW 8 L'scape 11 Non -Residential, Building Area 5700 s.f. FAR • 17 Max. Employees/Shift 2 Parking Required- Parking Provided 5 Project site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area Yes No- TIAL TUDYSOL ROEI S, V, 7. 77 'A) :PLAW, SOUFICE -OUTSIDE AGENCIES` _7 1) Ciilkr.n_ Ce-no—rat'Pian Land Use Elissn_ent--_--- 7,.: 22) CountyPlanNng Department 0 2) Cupon;no Caivi Plan" Public Saroly Element 23) Ad,acont Ci1j's Planning Dopart-nont at 1 3) Cupertno General Plan, Housing Element 24)Co,r.rj Department of Environmental Ilow., 'Cu, "4)' x­j.-2 P!.-.n. C4c-_'=n Ei,--- dr-1 25) MdPoninsula Regional open Space District �5) CL­0­.d!2 26) County Parks arid R—Gadon Department 27) Cupenno Sanitary District Zuportno General Plan. Appendix A H,:!sido Devc1opi. 28) Cupertino Union Sch661 Dijiriji Q I',) t,() 'r ig ment, 28) Fremont Union High School District dono`r�--F31.,n,--Land Use Map 30) Pacific Gas &'Electric Company 8)' •City Ridgeline Policy �31)�! Central Fire Distnct 9) Noise Elame nt Ame ndmenl --'County Sheriff'"""'"`" • 10) Cupertino General Planonstrant CiMaps 33) CALTRANS 34) County_Ttanspdrlat� Ag`enc�y EjfP35) Santa Claxis'VjUe-Y Water District ffN& S R6E DOCUMENTS 11) E) OUTSIDEAGENCY DOCUMENTS 12) City Aerial Photography Mapsry 36) BAACMD Su 13) 'Cupertir*Chror�clo*,(Cakfarruali.s:o Surrey bf C"Wjnini 1976). ,14) — Goological Report (sitespecific)37) FEMA Flood l61apVSCVWD Flood Maps 15) Parking Ordinance 1277 38) USDA. *So,:s of Santa Clara County� 111 16) Zoning Map — 39) County ' Hazardous Waste Management Plan -17)-',;06ng CedolSpocific Plan Docurrierti___'_­ 40) County Heritage Resources Inventory P)_CITY-AGENCIES{')_- 17).. .-OTHER SOURCES .18) Cupertino Planning& Community DovolopmentDapt. 41) Project Plan Sat'Application Materials.....,, -19) Cupertino Public Works DepV, 42)' 'Field RucoMa;sianco 20) Cupertino Parks & Recreation Department 43) Expurionco with PtOiLCI 01 similar scopo/characwfim-as 21) Cupe __.441) Caj Noise Otd.nanco - Utility_ _!#n�waler - 45) ABAG Projections Series TATe T-)3GOW -;.INSTRU, I Complete all In to fmali 6n're4u dst dd o ln"Chol n1li at Stu d '4j W hqq exp a 1­16in'g a y esponso; label your a nswer Cover pige. ' LEAVE BLANK 'SPACES ONLY clearly (Example: - N­ 3. Historical')Please try!to W' HEN ASPECIFIC ATEM IS�-NOT APPLI- -respond .'Concisely. -- iind•placi -as -many - jililaniialtorij CABLE. responses as possible on ench pnn- 5) Upon completing the chockil 2) Consult the Initial Study Source USI; Use the matirials St. sign and -date. the - listed themin'lo'c6mp'loi6 166'6ecklist ififormati6r-ji Preparors-Affidavit.": n Categories A through O. 6) Please attach the following materials before submitting the Initlal Study to Ih6 City:..-j You are am, ciuradeci to'Cito other relovent sources; it - - such sources aro used, lot in their litle(s) In the *Source" : -ProjortPlan SatorLogislative Documont(I copy).. column next to the questio'h to which they Locatidninap whh'slis dearq'6isrlid (whWn ippliciablo) 3) If you Check any of the "YES' responses to any giros- Ill SURE YOUR INITIAL STUDY SUBMITTAL I'l 11 tion, you must attach a shoot explaining the potential COMPLETE — INCOMPLETE MATERIALS MAY impact and suggest mitigation It needed: CAUSE PROCESSING DELAYS _J 41 0 IMPACT YES WILL THEPROJECT... � SOURCE Na yo,,,ronl sgon nLi Cunr"uv sgrwo l (LNguon (No PMPX") LLWatwn P.Po"01 A) LAND USE/GENERAL PLAN 1) Require a change from the land use designation for 0 the Subject site in the General Plan? ® 0 0 1,7,18 2) Require a change of zoning? 0 0 0 0 16.18 3) Require a charge or variance from an adopted 0 0 0 0 sp,#cdic plan other adopted policy statement? 17,18 4) Result in substantial change in the present land use of the site or that of adjoining properties? ® 0 0 0 0 7, 12, 6) Disrupt or divide the physical configuration of an established neighborhood? ® 0 0 7, 12, 23,42 7) Conflict with established recreational, educational, In ® 0 0 0 religious or scientific activities the project vicinity? 7.12.16 B) GEOLOGIC/SEISMIC HAZARD 1) Be located in an area which has potential for major ® 0 0 0. geologic hazard? 2,14 2) Be located on or adjacent to a known earthquake 0 0 0 fault? 0 0 2,14 3) Be located in a Geologic Study Zone? 0 0 0 0 0 2 4) Be located in an area of soil instability (subsidence, landslide, shrink/swell, soil creep or severi ero- sion)? t,L].t 0 0 0 0 2, 5, 10 5) Cause substantial erosion or siltation of a water. 0 0 S. course? ® 0 2, 10 6) Cause substantial disruption, displacement, com- paction or overcovering of soil either on -site or off- site? 0 0 0 0 0 2, 14, 41 7) Cause substantial change in topography or in a 0 ground surface feature? ® 0 0 0 12.41 8) involve construction of a building, road or septic ® 0 0 0 0 6, 12, 41 system on a slope of 10% or greater? C) RESOURCES/PARKS 1) Increase the existing removal rate, or resell in the removal of a natural resource for commercial put - poses (including Berns such as rock, sand, gravel, 0 trees, minerals or lopsolq? 0 0 0 5.10 2) Result inlhe substantial depletion of any non-renew- able natural resource? ® 0 0 0 5 3) Conven prima agricultural land (Class I or 11 sods) to non-agricultural use or impair the agricultural pro- rv't rv�t 0 0 duct(vity of nearby prime agricultural land? 0 0 5.35 4) Involve lands currently protected under the William- 0 0 0 5.18 son Act or any Open Space easement? 5) Substantially affect any existing agricultural uses? �` 0 0 0 7.16 IMPACT YES WILL THE PROJECT... S O U R C E „ Sp uI c ni sqM on, Cam Qb, ,pnd„�rn IMapauw, Z P,OPOSWI M•ipai,on NCCCSUCI ce iccated on. within or near a public or private ',.creanon facility, par%, wildlife preserve. public trail rimer n existence already or planned for future rd-1 Q Q Q Q 5, 10, 22, 25 mplementanon') In t 12, 0) SEWAGE/WATER QUALITY 1) Result in a septic field being constructed on sod with ® 0 0 [] 6.19 severe dratnneld performance limitations? 2) Result in a septic field being located within 50 feet of a drainage swale orwithin 100 feet of any well, water ® 0 0 0 35. 41, 42 course or water body? 3) Result mexlenswnotasewer main line with capacity, ® 0 19.41 to serve new development? 4) Substantially degrade surface orground water qual- ® 19, 35. 38 ity, or the public water supply? 5) Be located In an area of water supply concern (such ® 0 0 19.31 as low fire lbws)? E) DRAINAGE/FLOODING 1) Interfere substantially with ground water recharge? Q �] Q Q Q 11,35 2) Substantially change the direction, rate of flow or quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of ® Q [� 19. 35. 41 an aquifer by cuts or excavations? 3) Change the absorption rates, drainage patterns or 0 ® 0 19.35 the rate/amount of surface runolf? 4) Involve a natural drainage channel or streambed or water course such as to alter the location, course or ® 0 0 35, 41. 42 5) flow of its waters? Be located in a floodway or floodplain Area? Q 0 Q C] 0 37 F) FLORA AND FAUNA 1) Significantly affect fish, wildlife, reptiles or plant file by changing the diversity or numbers of existing species, or by introducing new species, or by ® 0 0 restricting migration or movement? 5, 2) Substantially reduce the habitat area for fish, anl- 0 mals or plants? ® 5, 10 3) Change the existing habitat, food source or nesting place for a rare or endangered specie of plants or 0 5,10 animals? 4) Involve construction within 100 feet of a riparian ® 0 0 Q area? 10, 41, 42 nvolve cutting/removal of specimen scale trees, �y r�1 0 0 0 11, 41, 42 ::nether indigenous to the site or introduced? • IMPACT � YES WILL THEPROJECT... SOURCE ran Sgnronr sgoda>,nr c.W.M Spnrsanr (ww+mn Propdseo) (u wgauon Proposed) G) TRANSPORTATION 1) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system? 0 ® 0 0 0 4, 19, 33 2) Cause any public or private street intersection to function below Level of Service D? r�--��•�� r n 0 0 0 4.19 3) Increase traffic hazards topedestrians, bicyclists and vehicles? I_1 J 0 Q 19,32 4) Adversely affect access to commercial establish- ments, public buildings, schools• parks or other pe- destrian oriented activity areas? ® 0 0 Q 10.19 5) Cause a reduction in public transportation service at 0 Q 0 0 or near the project site? 34 6) Increase demand upon existing parking facilities, or engender demand for new parking space? r n 0 0 0 18.41 7) Inhibit use of alternalive modes of transportation to Utl Q 0 0 0 private aMomobile usage?- 5, 19, 33. 34 H) HOUSING 1) Reduce the supply of affordable housing in the community, or result in the displacement of persons from their present home? ® 0 0 0 0 3, 18 2) Increase the cost of housing in the area, or substan- tially change the variety of housutg types found in the Q Q Q Q 3.18 3) community? Create a substantial demand for new housing? ® 0 3, 18. 45 I) HEALTH & SAFETY 1) Involve the application, use, disposal or manufacture of potentially hazardous materials? ® 0 31, 39, 41 2) Involve risk of explosion or other forms of uncon- trolled release of hazardous substances? , n 0 0 0 31.43 3) Involve the removal or continued use of any existing, / or installation of any new underground chemical or Q Q Ernf �� Q Q 31, 41, 42 4) fuel storage tank? Be located in an area of seasonal fire danger? ® Q Q Q 0 2.31 5) Employ technology which could adversely affect public safety in the event of a breakdown? 0 41,43 6) Provide breeding grounds for mosquitos or other Q Q Q Q Q 24 disease vectors? J) AIR QUALITY 1) Create objectionable odors? r n 0 0 41.43 2) Violate any ambient air quality standards. contribute substantially to an existing or projected au quality violation• or expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of pollutants? ® 0 0 5, 36, 41 WILL THE PROJECT... IMPACT Not S-i;M l Sgry�oni ..QndI l I INWgaliWI ,NO Piopusual M,Gwi P,oposwl SOURCE NOISE 1) Increase substantially the ambient noise environ- ment of the project vicinity during construction of the project? ® 0 9, 41 2) Result in a sustained Increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity following construction of the project? ® 0 0 9, 41 3) Result in sustained noise levels beyond the thresh- olds of sound energy and duration limits contained in the City's Noise Ordinance? © 9.44 IL) AESTHETICS 1) Be generally in conformance with applicable design guidelines? 0 0 ® 0 17.41 2) Create an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? [� ^ O 0 0 41.42 3) Visually intrude upon an area of natural scenic quali- ties? ® 0 0 0 0 5,42 4) Obstruct view of a scenic ndgeline visibile from the valley floor? m 5.8. 5) Obstruct views of the city's adjacent hillsides from residential areas or public lands ® 10. 22, 24.41 6) Adversely affect the architectural character of an established neighborhood or business district? m U 0 41, 42 7) Produce glare from andisial lighting sources upon adjacent properties or public roadways? 0 41.43 11,1) ENERGY 11 Involve the use of unusually large quantities of fossil luels or non-renewable energy sources? ® 0 0 0 0 5, 41 2) Rem6vevegetationproviding summer Shade orwind- breaks to an existing or proposed building? ® 0 41; 42 3) Significantly reduce solar access to an adjacent building, public recreation space or private yard? ® r F 0 41, 42 rl) HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL 1 ) Be located in an area of potential archeaologlcal or paleontological resources? Affect adversely a property of historic or cultural significance to the community, except as part of a scientific study'? CM u l_.J = Q 110, 42 0 U 11, 18. 41. 42 0 WILL THE PROJECT... T `0 Na sgn�cun Sqn onr Cwnw S O U R C E uom 11P wr9umNO s9r W ropotaol ugauon Prapos�01 OI PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES t I Produce solid waste in substantial quantities? ® Q Q Q Q 41 2) Induce substantial growth, or alter the location, dlstn- rulion, or density of the human population of an area? Q Q Q Q 1,45 3) Cause substantial impact upon, or increase the need for: a) Fire Protection Services? � 0 r 0 18.31 b) Police Services? ® = 0 0 O 32 c) Public Schools? O 0 O 28.29 d) Parks/Recreation Facilities? y r--1 LO O 5, 17, 19. 26 e) Maintenance of Public Facilities? f 'n 0 0 0 18, 19. 41 1) Other Governmental Services? © 0 0 0 18 4) Cause substantial impact upon existing utilities or infrastructure in the following calegones: a) Electricity? m 0 C� 30,41 b) Natural Gas? l=t7 0 L� [� 0 30,41 c) Water? d) Sewage treatment and disposal? O 0 0 0 0 21 18,41 e) Storm water management? 35.36 5) Generate demand for use of any public facility which . causes that facility to reach or exceed its capacity? Q [� Q Q,. Q, 18, 41, 43 *I WILL THE PROJECT... YES NO 1) Have the potential to degrade substantially the quality of the environment. to Substantially diminish the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, to cause a fish or wildlife population to drop be low f self-sustaining levels, to threaten or eliminate a platnt or animal oommunity. to reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate Important examples of the major periods of CalHomia'S history or prehistory? 2) Have the potential to achieve short term environmental goats to the disadvantage of tong tens 17-7-1 environmental goals? 3) Nave environmental impacts which are Individually limited, but are cumulatively considerable? ('Cumulatively considerable' means that the incremental effects of an individual project are substantive when viewed in conjunction with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) 4) Have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse impacts on human beings, either directly or indirectly? l hereby canily that the information provided in this Initial Study is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief; candy that I have u"d 1NOper diligence in responding accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted appro- ,male source references when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. thereby acKnowledge that any substantial errors dejected within this Initial Study may cause cause delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and hereby agree to hold harmless the City of Cupertino,its staff and authorized igenls, from the consequences Of Such delay Or discontinuance. Preparers Signature 23'2. /14: 41 L'^,12G Date 7. -_ Print Preparer's Name i,4'}%•'y �'r•' lti' 1 - frohe 11'Lt wrr. M. ' " ,' T AREAS: ❑ Land UserGeneral Plan ❑ GeologivSeismic Hazard ❑ Resources/Parks ❑ Housing ❑ SawageiWater Quality ❑ Dminage/Flooding ❑ Flora & Fauna ❑ Transponation ❑ Historical/Archaeological ❑ Health & Safety ❑ Air Quality ❑ Noise ❑ Historical/Geological ❑ Public ServiceWUtililies ❑ Energy ❑ Aesthetics STAFF EVALUATION 4W14 t.One On the basis of this Initial Study, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) finds: That the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and recommends that a NEGATIVE DECLARATION be granted. That althougIn the project could have a significant effect on the environment,no significant effect will occur because mitigation measures are included in the project. ERC recommends that a NEGATIVE DECLARATION be granted. F That the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and recommends that an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT be prepared. Staff Evaluator ERC Chairperson Date Date q* i CITY OF CUPE 10 NEGATIVE DECLARATION March 18, 1991 As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1973, and amended on March 4, 1974, January 17, 1977, May 1, 1978, and July 7, 1980, the following described project was granted a Negative Declaration by the City council of the City of Cupertino on March 18, 1991. PROJECP DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Application 25-EA-90 Application No.(s) 17-U-90 Applicant Chevron Research/Technoloav Co. Property Owner Cupertino De Oro Club Location Northeast corner of Homestead Road and De Anza Blvd. DISCRMONARY ACTION RDOUESP USE PERMIT to demolish existing service station improvements and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 1,500 s.f. of building area erxxx1¢lassing a food market and car wash, with related site improvements. The city council granted a Negative Declaration since the project is consistent with the General Plan and there is no significant environmental impacts. Robert Cowan Director of Community Development This is to certify that the above Negative Declaration was filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on , 1991. City Clerk erc\neg25ea90 CITY OF CUPERTINO REOOMMENDATION OF E VIROMMAL REVIEW COMUTM October 11, 1990 As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure, adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1983, as amended, the following described project was reviewed by the Environmental Review Coimnittee of the City of Cupertino on October 11, 1990, at which time the c=uttee found that the project does not have a significant impact on the environment and, therefore, is rec=nending to the decisiomnaking body that a Negative Declaration be prepared. Application 25-EA-90 Application No.(s) 17-U-90 Applicant Chevron Research/Technolaav Co. • Property Owner Cupertino De Oro Club Location Northeast corner of Homestead Road and De Anza Blvd. DISCRETIONARY ACTION RDOUEST USE PE[dffT to demolish existing service station improvements and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 1,500 s.f. of building area enooapassing a food market and car wash, with related site improvements. FINDINGS OF THE ENVIROI�hNTAL REVIEW CQMMEE The Environmental Review Committee recommends the granting of a Negative Declaration finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan and has no significant environmental impacts. Vim- s c , Robert Cowan Director of CM nunity Development erc\rec25ea90 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE Or FEE EXEMPTION is Minimis Impact Finding .Project Title/Location Name and Address of Project Proponent (include county): A lications 25-EA-90 and 17-U-90: Chevron Research/Technolo Co. Use Permit to demolish existing service station improvements and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 1500 sq.ft. of building area encompassing a food market and car wash, with related site improvements. Site is located at northeast corner of Homestead Road & De Anza Blvd. Project Description: Use Permit demolishing existing service station improvements and reconstructing new self service fuel station, with, related site improvements. Findings of Exemption (attach required findings): 1) The City completed an Initial Study which contains no evidence of any impact to the fisheries or wildlife habitat of the community .and surrounding region. 2) No new increment of demand for recreational use of fish and wildlife resource areas is anticipated. Certification: I hereby certify that the lead agency has made the above findings of fact and that based upon the initial study and hearing record the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. 'SG'64�' (ChiogePCa�ni�}t0 an official) Title:Director, Community Dev. Lead Agency Cit Ot Cu ertino Date STATE OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY - DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME ENVIRONMENTAL FILING FEE CASH RECEII'T Lead Agency: Date: _ Counly/Slate Agency of Filing: Document No.: Project Title: Project Applicant Name: Telephone No.: Project Applicant Address: Project Applicant (check appropriate box): Local Public Agency❑ School District❑ Othcr Special DistriclE:1 State Agency ❑ Private Entity ❑ CIIFCK APPI ICAFII F=FEES: ( ) Environmental Impact Report $850.00 $ ( ) Negative Declaration $1,250.00 $ ( ) Application Fee Water Diversion (State Water Resources Control Board Only) $950.00 $ ( ) Projects Subject to Certified Regulatory Programs $850.00 $ ( ) County Administrative Fee W.00 S ( ) Project That Is Exempt From Fees TOTAL RECEIVED $ Signature and title of person receiving payment: FFIRST COPY•PROJECT APPUCANT SECOND COPY"DFG1FAS8 THIRD COPY -LEAP AGENCY FOURTH COPY"OOUNTY/STATE AGENCY OF FILING OI 1f1.s.IMn r Landscape Architect's Certifying Statement for Compliance With Landscaping/Irrigation Guidelines Installation Address: s iratoga - sunuryvale tcd./Fianestead Rd. Installation Completion Date: Fall 19% est. Water ProvideCalif. water service Co. r. Landscape Architect (print name): David L. Gates & Associates Parcel Size: 180' x 186' Land Use: service station YES NO (If "NO", attach explanation) CR ❑ 1) Minimum 9091. of all plantings are drought -tolerant. Q ❑ 2) Turf limited to functional areas; turf and water features less than 25% total landscape area. 66 ❑ 3) Minimum turf area dimension = 8 ft. . ® ❑ 4) Special ornamentals less than 107. of landscaped area. N.A. ❑ ❑ 5) Terracing/sloped areas in conformance. N.A. ❑ ❑ 6) Drainage routed away from buildings; on -site retention of irrigation water included. ® ❑ 7) Tree/turf separation and tree islands per Guidelines. (9 ❑ 8) Soil additives/amendments provided in accordance with attached narrative explanation. ® ❑ 9) Water features designed/equipped per Section 4 of Guidelines. t& ❑ 10) Soil mulch added where appropriate (noted on diagram). ® ❑ 11) Planting zones delineated on plan * ❑ ❑ 12) Sprinkler heads have matched precipitation rateswithin each control valve circuit. * ❑ ❑ 13) Precipitation rates for a given circuit do not exceed soil absorption rates. * ❑ ❑ 14) All sprinkler heads have serviceable check valves where elevation differential will cause ilow head drainage. * ❑ ❑ 15) Sprinkler system designed for head -co-head coverage. * ❑ ❑ 16) Controller has multiple programming, repeat cycle capability, flexible calendar program, and monthly irrigation schedule. * ❑ ❑ 17) Controller set to water between 590 p.m. and 10:00 a.m. and equipped with rain shut-off device. * ❑ • ❑ 18) Monthly irrigation schedule given to landscape manager and/or maintenance contractor. * ❑ ❑ 19) Water budge included with plans. I hereby certify that the above information is accurate and complies with the landscape standards of The City of ertmo. I Landscape Architect` (Da crew * = Irrigation plan not yet developed. ) •, �' {; ��ti . °V April 8,1991 City of Cupertino Planning Department 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 To Whom It May Concern: The conceptual landscape plan prepared by our company, dated 11/21/90 and revised by Chevron 3/22/90, is in compliance with the "Landscape and Irrigation Guidelines" for the City of Cupertino (June 4, 1990). We are recommending one minor change at this time, that fir bark instead of redwood bark mulch be specified beneath the Quercus agrifolia trees. The site specific irrigation plan will be developed once the conceptual landscape plan is approved and the design will reflect the Guidelines. Attached is the requested Certification Statement. Should you have any questions contact David Gates at (415) 736-8176. Sincerely, lind ates LG:ch enclosure DAVID L DABS A ABBOC►AM LAND PLANNING • LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • URBAN DESIGN 2440TASSAJARA LN., DANVILLE. CA. 94I5766,, 4I5•&77•AI7, - _ nny v,�a c•aa np.vvv r.vi v�Py. vZr .OTn./OT.PLDOO TG.. ............ OD CHEVRON RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY COMPANY Telecopler Servlcaa 2400 Camino Ramon, Room K1001C San Ramon, California 94583 5 6 9 ! R r WORK ORDER N TO: (Name) /1/91/L K 4f44fCIIEt' (Company) czePF2 i/.✓ o /°L7lkVI.u4 CI a['/C'1"/N (3 c /1 i (Fox Numberl 4`l00 25 Z- - 0 7 S 3 j (Conflrmina Number) FROM: Name) /" IK E MA AJ o S (Qlvlslonl G E V2)�N - c/C.TC (Room/Bldg.! NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER):. SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: MA21G C{• Jrt nN .7BG /Z&.1D TO ear ion 000-E'.e> (N(T N Tli E CRojyl'Y ,Sl/a2T'6N/^/q I?ASe c O A I Po reNTIAL 5c.A6L.D4.EyecRYS c FFv2u., �O ES !N/9Nr TO P2 o GEE.0 717, r q.E ' ScIQIf-rCK Z7/FFE2d AEI- c q,-j 'Y FhS[(A e-.00.U/C T/ZE#TTMCN'r 0ASEp 0 -12 2�S Pa PJS E 7'#tl7- 17fI'S ciA.S ..' ACCEPT-RaL.e P64 j5 4. hFEfi 2 ( Al I - IP YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE PHONE 415.842.gAM IMMEDIATELY. r Co o I OUR TELI`COPIER NUMBER: RAPICOM 120 (415) 842.9*R $3O5 OPERATOR'S NAME: TIME TRANSMITTED: DATE TRANSMITTED: �1 I RETURN ORIGINAL TO: YJW6692.144 5.44.010 Chapter 5.44 CONCURRENT SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND GASOLINE Sections: 5.44.010 Purpose. 5.44.020 Applicability. 5.44.030 Granting of use permit. 5.44.040 Public hearing. 5.44.050 Use permit grant or denial — Findings. 5.44.060 Restrictions. 5.44.070 Appeals. 5.44.080 Severability. 5.44.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish reg- ulations pertaining to those establishments which concurrently sell motor vehicle fuel and alcoholic beverages, including beer and wine. (Ord. 1478 § l (part), 1988) 5.44.020 Applicability. This chapter applies to any establishment within a General Commercial (CG) zone which. pursuant to a conditional use permit, sells or proposes to sell, concurrently, alcoholic bev- erages, including but not limited to beer and wine, and motor vehicle fuel. (Ord. 1478 § I (part), 1988) 5.44.030 Granting of use permit. An establishment subject to this chapter may be permitted where it, in the opinion of the Plan- ning Commission, is compatible with existing and planned cues in the particular zone or neigh- borhood. (Ord. 1478 § I (part), 1988) 5.44.040 Public hearing. A. The Planning Commission. after having received an application for a conditional use per- mit by any person proposing a use which is sub- ject to this chapter, shall set a time for the holding of a public hearing thereon. B. Any person may address the Planning Commission and present testimony regarding the particular conditional use permit applica- tion. (Ord. 1478 § i (part), 1988) 5.44.050 Use permit grant or denial — Findings. Written findings regarding the granting or denial of any conditional use permit subject to this chapter shall be made by the Planning Com- mission. and shall be based on substantial evi- dence in light of the entire administrative record. (Ord. 1478 § I (pan), 1988) 5.44.060 Restrictions. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any establishment subject to this chapter shall abide by the following restrictions: A. No beer or wine shall be displayed within five feet of the cash register or the front door unlesss it is in a permanently affixed cooler. B. No advertisement of alcoholic beverages shall be displayed at motor fuel islands. . C. No sale of alcoholic beverages shall be made from a drive-in window. D. No display or sale of beer or wine shall be made from an ice tub. E. No beer or wine advertising shall be located on motor fuel islands and no self -illuminated advertising for beer or wine shall be located on buildings or windows. F. Employees on duty between the hours of ten p.m. and two a.m. shall be at least twenty-one years of age to sell beer and wine. (Ord. 1478 § l (part), 1988) l 42.1 5.44.070 Appeals. A. Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Planning Commission under the provisions of this chapter may appeal the decision to the City Council by filing written notice of the appeal with the City Clerk within five days after the date of the decision. B. Such notice of appeal must state: 1. The asserted error. (cumnino 3•89) 5.44.070 2. The grounds upon which the appeal is taken; and 3. The name of the party appealing. The notice of appeal must be signed by the party appealing, or by his agent. Such notice of appeal shall not be effective unless it is riled with the City Clerk within the time required by subsection A of this section. C. A public hearing shall be held by the City Council within thirty days from the date of the filing of the notice. D. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be given by mail, postage prepaid, and dis- patched not less than ten days prior to the hear- •ing to the applicant at his address as shown upon notice of appeal. E. The City Council shall hear the appeal. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Council may • affirm, reverse or modify the action appealed; subject, however, to the provisions of this chap- ter. The findings and decisions of the City Coun- cil shall be entered upon the minutes of the City Council, and the decision shall be final and shall take effect as directed by the City Council. (Ord. 1478 § l (part), 1988) 5.44.080 Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter is for any reason held to be unconstitutional, such decisions shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter. The legislative body declares that it would have passed this chapter and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses. or phrases be declared unconstitutional. (Ord.1479 § l (part), 1988) )cupmtnu 3-99) 142-2 CITY of CUPERinNo CODE ENFCRCEMEa CFFCE . 10300 TCRRE AVE. CUPERTIND, CA. 95014 252-4505 APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE LOCATION: 11010 M. DG AW?-, Bt-Vb N?r-R710 Q, CA • 9soi c/ TYPE OF BUSINESS: CAS STPrTI/CA_ R WASNhV1— !Aoe—1 • • APPLICANTS. AYYIme-A4 h 5Rsat1NEL SElzvjccS INC. TYPE OF LICENSE: Qfr SAI..E BEER AND WINE • POSTING DATE: COMMENTS: POSTED W 7HE 1-1657- MOM-r Wl�vDfl w 0 Code Enforcement Officer 4--y STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL Grounds for Protest Against Applications for Beverage Licenses: (1) The premises are located within the immediate vicinity of a school, church, hospital or children's public play- ground and the normal operation of the licensed premises would interfere with their respective functions...........( ) (2) The premises are located in a residential area, and the normal operation of the licensed premises would interfere with the quiet enjoyment of their property by the resi- dents of the area .........................................( ) (3) Licensing the premises would create a public nuisance, as defined in Penal Code Section 370, in that (the specific facts leading to this conclusion must be stated)..........( ) • (4) Issuance of the license to the premises would tend to create a law enforcement problem or aggravate an already existing police problem ...................................( ) (5) Issuance of the license to the premises would result in or add to undue concentration of licenses .................( ) (6) Licensing the premises would be contrary to the provisions • of a valid zoning ordinance ...............................( ) (7) The applicant is not the true or sole owner of the business to be licensed ............................................( ) (8) The applicant (or manager of on -sale premises) has been convicted of a felony or of a crime involving moral turpi- tude, or of one of the offenses listed in subdivision (b) of Section 24200 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act....( ) (9) The applicant (or manager of on -sale premises) has a record of chronic insobriety .....................................( ) (10) The applicant (or manager of on -sale premises) has a police record which disqualifies him for a license ...............( ) (12) COMMENTS • S (0 PY M eY /beer►-_"_ •M _.:: • • APPLICATION FOR ALCONOLIC UVUAOR UCENBR(B) Tar Dopanmonr of Alcoholic beverage Control 1901 Broadroy Sarorrnto, Cald. v5R19 Tan Jose urnacv s..o. .n•.r The undvupn.d b•r•by apph., fa Lunar dumbed as follora I. TYPES) OF LICENSES) FILE NO. Lt-9a19 Boor and L%lno Applied order Sea. 210" ❑ Effedfre Dater RECEIPT NO. GEOGRAP'NICAL CODE •:3b3 Date Issued 2. NAME(S) Of APPLICANT(S) Temp. P.—I ERMire Dole: i- .1 iranion n01 r'/iC7 111C, - 3. TYPES) Of TRANSACTIONS) FEE LIC. TYPE urig�u! S IUJ.vJ 2v • Aonuel 34.uu �. Name of Brsinsse S. Locator, of buwneu-Number and Sheet 11++1:t-. uJ:IJZ1 1.1 V.:a Gy aUp Cade County :rnd r•S d 'i ••• q TOTAL S 131.u0 6. It M1em Licensed, I. Are Promise, Inside Show Type of License y City Limits B. Marlirp Addros (il diMnN from S)-Numer band Sr - ❑.7, V«wl . cite ta.anton. I:,r ba,fSA Yat 9. "are you even been convicted of a felony? 10. Nov you ever riolatod any of the provi.tons of the Alcoholic beverage Control Act a regulation. of the Department par• % :. I.J r 1J9 r3 t tort taining to the Act? 11. Explain a'•TES'• an.rer to it... 9 or 10 on an artachm•nl rhich all be deemed part of this opplicali- 12. Applicont agrees (a) that any manager employed in on -sole licensed 7.es •rill have all the yoaliRmtions of a tiunsee, and (b) that he rill nal violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the proritio , of the Atcoholic Beverage Control Act. 13. $TAIE-OF CALIFORNIA Count of ._____________________________________ Dat•____________________�___._ Vrr):. v...IM1'iN .«Mr. w w .w 4erra .rw«. \N,.. .wr.W. W r n . rM yN+,w. r ,w. N Ilr ,•Nrrru.. r •` 6iiiw.N /\i',IN4wN a,.rr,rrr. •,re r W rrrw• reNyeryti ..Ir w\,..rN rM rr4•Nr erN.rrr » b \Nrllr I]I Mwr Y •„ r„e W Iwr D • rj'w14,1'W wN .,ewr Iw rrr,•xr Wr,N W rlrr we .ale M N rw eer.wr r\arrl. rr r, ,w� 1i1 m« r •ww .n.r r\,. r\, •N4w ` rt Mat w r•rarr wwwr M r1„ a,eWW', w ,rer4,wi \,tr » M rw•IwrN WrrrW IYr«IN 1 rYr\ Wr r•N4rir 4 r„A� je L]JN. �{{'J«r ,,,I-erlrw r .rrwre wrJr 4 r rY y w•Jr r., rrrN N , 4r w » IJ.rI r warty rwr,• :. .«, Ilo..rrr Iwl -_ pt. `~r •. Wti r .441• IY wwJw »N1srw .a aM .n\ rY arrrrrr r I. ew r arrWl•Jr . INrw, u r Iw w,.r yr N \W«« r aKw N rrrrlwwi t]I rM rM rrrrrl« •wl.r,tw rr N ..r4n.+ \r «Mw W yN4,w « W W,w...rl. » »rlwy WMMM1 M ----------------------------- APPLICATION BY TRANSFEROR IS. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of-_____r___-_________-______-____Dow_-_-______--_-__.____- Y.er rrrrrr N Irv. we rr .W Jrerr, a \al,—. rwne« W .Itl w n W 14rw, w aa«.xw Nh« N M aw•rew W»w. V W Ir•e,l,e Ywlr »N4rrwV eIr ,.erlrW » W, Irur Mrrlr ,wI4.r4, r Iry \a\,Ilr rtl Irr,r Y •arr\r rY•r aINrNN. w ar+rrLr W +» • rY •Ir,rA,e Wr«Irt Yrrl►,e L,le- ,••e r rrrlw w • W eerlrerw w r WIW bir,r,• r W war ,1 rlr:r •M4,rW •,e1f•Iwti a wr\ rrrrrw la ,rre.W \r W awar«r 12I I\er IW •wl« ,M4enr r Y•rerN wrJw 1, w w, r, rrWr •„ Mrrr N • 4r 0. » INW ��,r,rN 4W rr, Wr wMr, �.., aaMY rrr, M w rW\ rW Nr Yw ,wl4r4r Ir MN .r\ W aarrrrr r r •N, r r,V�M �• rr I« r.r ,rKM N 4,rlwr r » rlrwe r i.lwa r, ✓Kr« N w r wr »I Wr W wrJw' erll4rw wer ,NW,r \rrwnrr W • r/Nomdil of lfeensee(d _ 17, Sianalure(4 of lkenseo(s) _ _TfL License Number44 19. L«anon Number and Street City and Vp Cod• County Do Not Write Blow This Line; For Deportmrnl Use Only Atlached: ❑ Recorded notice, a j❑ Fiduciary petpon, - ___� COPIES MAILED - ------- ra.w... ❑ Reneral: Fee of __________Poid at _________________ office on ------------ -_-Aeceipt No..-____________________- .•e or l n+e a unr s%1 CITY of CUPERTINO CCDE ENFCRCENE9 CFFCE 10300 TMRE AVE. CUPERTIID, CI.95014 252-4505 • APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE LOCATION: 165-54i21'IU645QAI/VYIIALC Cv Y Na fA- gsvi TYPE OF BUSINESS: O p�-S,4L(5 aENJCWAL LiavoR- SE 7oIQ APPLICANTS: TH1-FE t-s I N C• • TYPE OF LICENSE: Vfrp54(,� Q.A( 67&E POSTING DATE: 11 L7% 7 • COMMENTS: F05T)h la -M E 5 /F C✓I ADM w A tvYkiDo er. _ oz w-71,4, Code Enforcement fficer City of Cupertino Departrnent of Community 103300Torre Avenue, Cupertino, Ca. 95014 (408) 252.4505 Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino will hold a public hearing on the matter described below: Application No.(s) 17-U-90 and 25-FA-90 Applicant Chevron Research/Technoloiy Co. Property Owner Cupertino De Oro Club Location Northeast corner of Homestead Road and De Anza Blvd. USE PERM to demolish existing service station improvements and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 5,700 s.f. of building area encompassing a food market and car wash, with related site .improvements. SAID PUBLIC REARING WILL BE HELD AT THE HOUR OF 7:30 P.M. ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 8, 1990, IN THE OOUN= aNSERS OF CITY HALL, 10300 TOME AVENUE, CUPERTINO, AT WHICH TIME AND PLACE ALL PERSONS INTERESIM TH[REIN MAY APPEAR AND BE HEARD ON SAID MATTER. THE AGENDA FOR THE PUBLIC I ARING WILL BE AVAILABLE ON MM FRIDAY APITTOIOON PRECEDING THE MEE1T1 NG. *NOTE: ITEM MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. IF INTERESTED IN AN ITEM, PLEASE CALL PRIOR TO MEETING DATE 70 VERIFY IF APPLICATION IS Sr L ON THE AGENDA. Robert Cowan Director of Cmmwdty Development 9/21/90 legals\ph17u90 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I certify that on this day I mailed the attached Notice of Public Ilearing to all addresses as indicated on the attached certified • mailing list as required by the appropriate ordinance of the City of Cupertino. ATC Cl Citq of Cuperti"o 10 IM lorre Avenue Cult ). CA 95014-1255 T,-k-phone: )408) 252.4505 FAX: (408) 252-0753 COMMUNITY D[V[IOPM[NT August 6, 1990 Application No.(s) 17-U-90 and 25-EA-90 Applicant Karen Dennison Property Owner ox3pr iIto De0ro Club Location 11010 N- DeAnza Blvd, P.O. Box 500 Cupet6no, CA 95015.OSBO USE PERm:LT to remove existing structures and construct a new service station with a car wash. The City of Cupertino has received the subject application and has scheduled a hearing regarding this matter before the Planning Commission at the meeting of September 10, 1990. A ccpy of the Edibit describing the proposed project is enclosed for your review. Please forward any comments to this office within 10 days from the date noted above. Further information is available from the • Department of Mmau lity Development (408) 252-4505. Robert Cowan Director of Community Development Enclosure legals\agl7u90 Cit-4 of Cupertino 10 I(K) lurrr• A,c P.O. Box 500 Cupr•runu, CA 95014-1155 Cupertino, CA 95015-0580 II•li•phum•' 14U01 252-4505 I A l I408I 252-075 1 Septanber 21, 1990 Application No.(s) 17-U-90 and 25-EA-90 • Applicant Eargn Dennison Property Owner Cwertiw DeOro Club Vocation 11010 N. DeAnza Blvd. USE PamT to remove existing structures and construct a new service station with a car wash. The City of Cupertino has received the subject application and has scheduled a hearing regarding this matter before the Planning Ornmission at the meeting of October 8, 1990. A copy of the Elduibit describing the proposed project is enclosed for your review. Please forward any contents to this office within 10 days from the date noted above. Further information is available from the • Department of Community Development (408) 252-4505. Robert Cowan Director of Cta1mmity Development Enclosure legals\agl7u90 MAILING LIST FOR PUBLIC NOTICE is r Assessors Parcel Number Property Address Book Page Parcel OWNER ADDRESS If not owner occupied 309 41 024 Linda Blodgett Occupant 1710 Granger Avenue 1663 Albatross Drive Los Altos, CA 94022 Sunnyvale, CA 94087 309 42 031 Jerome Strom Occupant Strom & Associates 120 Locksunart Way 438 Cambridge Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94087 Palo Alto, CA 94306 309 42 032 Penco Assn. Occupant P. O. Box 7534 160 Locksunart Way San Jose, CA 95150 Sunnyvale, CA 94087 309 42 038 Cupertino De Oro Club, Inc. Occupant P. O. Box 361 20441 E. Homestead Road Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 316 01 024 D. W. Marian[ Development Co. Occupant 4 Main Street, #2 10930 N. Saratoga -Sunnyvale Road Los Altos, CA 94022 Cupertino, CA 95014 323 44 001 Ronald Gallo 11030 Firethorne Drive Cupertino, CA 95014 323 44 002 Fung Yap 11032 Firethorne Drive Cupertino, CA 95014 323 44 014 Joe & Alice Bailey 20531 Shady Oak Lane Cupertino, CA 95014 323 44 042 Lynore Staten 20552 Shady Oak Lane Cupertino, CA 95014 323 44 047 William & Rachel Clay l 20530 Shady Oak Lane Cupertino, CA 95014 326 10 040 Joseph & Florence Franco Occupant 2277 Alum Rock Avenue 20580 Homestead Road San Jose, CA 95116 Cupertino, CA 95014 I certify that this is a true accurate list of property owners of parcels within 300 ft. of site perimeter. An incorrect mailing list and/or APN map/envelopes may invalidate the decision of the Planning Commission or City Council and result in the need to refile the application and payment of fee. KLO7741.E 00I4Vir 4/-1/ Owner/Applicant/Title Company r MAILING LIST FOR PUBLIC NOTICE (cont.) • 48 Assessors Parcel Number Property Address Book Page Parcel OWNER ADDRESS If not owner occupied 326 10 041 John Vidovich & Kathy Tomaino Occupant 1307 S. Mary Avenue, #201 10931 N. De Anza Blvd. Sunnyvale, CA 94087 Cupertino, CA 95014 326 10 059 Sumitomo Bank of California Occupant 320 California Street, #3 10991-A N. De Anza Blvd. San Francisco, CA 94104 Cupertino, CA 95014 323 44 015 Frank & Ma Shallenberger 20533 Shady Oak Lane Cupertino, CA 95014 323 44 043 Clara De Laney R. W. Ulricksen 20550 Shady Oak Lane Cupertino, CA 95014 323 44 044 Alexander & Sherry Bennett 20542 Shady Oak Lane Cupertino, CA 95014 323 44 045 Gilda Mangold Gildo & Fran Codispoti 20540 Shady Oak Lane Cupertino, CA 95014 323 44 046 Yun-Sheng & Chiu-Lie Hwang 20532 Shady Oak Lane Cupertino, CA 95014 309 41 24 Village Court of Sunnyvale Homeowner's Association 1631 Albatross Drive Sunnyvale, CA 94087 323 44 1, 2, 14, Cupertino Countrywood 15, 42. c/o Community Management 43, 44, Services Inc. 45, 46, 47 1585 The Alameda San Jose, CA 95126 certify that this is a true accurate list of property owners of parcels within 300 ft. of site perimeter. An incorrect mailing list and/or APN map/envelopes may invalidate the decision of the Planning Commission or City Council and result in the need to refile the application and payment of fee. iaon41.a Owner/ApplicantTtle Company i i grrlC( Or • Covb Ta A!s[lsor — $..•A CLA(A Covl.rr• CALIro Ar1A 42 TPACT NS4473 O VILLAGE COURT TRACT 4 VILLAGE 6OUR7?UN NT2 J — J ��, � ¢•; r--•--- DRIVE a T ALBATROS1I S Iµla %♦ f• � j LZ -_flfl _—t-_V!l++y R^�� I _� —♦ q ! La„, a qt � 1. � 1 O+ K-y I r;j irir .•n'�'-^SL +,-r--'i rrr•1sw 1 _w ir- LOT Si I.U.C. t 'car iQf�•L� CQYVoY AREA Al SC S![o WT. vrITS •B�yi . COMM04 AREA ASS(S!(O 111Tr1 IIrTS LOT IS �1TM tL' : may.. I `'ff Ar.-r-1Cli'• x: h � r. 3,7 r � 2 II 4 LB'� 6J N 14 ? it ^ic rs a ! I q IS -I q 17 1 s I 20 I . 1! L L�.� .�.....♦) I floc � I w m N • W - Y i SARATOGA - SUNNYVALE ROAD- --� o: }}brr.>zCLarv.✓/3 i��5oiSti-'h cam- W d �L.lY171 Vtu�.l. o �! 1' i I ap1e- Ccx.lr'�" Y "jam O r(Gr'Y.CA7.J(1C/':� A•a6oClethRS1 41u� { n� IrX•t.'iTisas p� ✓c 0 m m A w N U a r ] r sraa..ef.r.f..ra%n..e1v o 0 x• isss��s • AY. )O 7 ' CAnter Y* 5mcor..SK.11. T.76.. &2W. jj HOMESTEAD _ - 326 17.66 AC. TOTAL BK 309 ' • 39 •• \ _ �7. V- 200' t c 41 • I FREEWAY JUNIPERO TERRA AVH- ' `W • COMPILED IN CON F!V6AANCE YRTN 9EG 317 Or THE NEVENUE's TAXATN)N CWE • ErrECTWE OATS •NAACH 1.1999 _ ALFRED E. CARLSON —ASSESSOR PM 589• M-19 P.M.265-M-16 PCL.3 323 I—N. DE ANZA c< L O C T6GW=SU"YVALE P.M.272-M 5 ,BLVD. ee� •a Ie♦Ji ' 292 AC NET --� 58 ry - P •,� 1. 99 AC. NET. aenl. wits Of AwA 6LVA PCL A 5209ACNET ^_ 2.50AC. 55 5 LOT 1 PCL. 1 -1 9.309 AC. I O §I o _ r tit'" 2 e PCL. 1 4 "Al .TT... / FRANCO CT. PM. 594 - M - 9 a`••P.M. 391-M-46 CONa^a[D iN WIN UE I nC[ r:-m O< TN( .E v[MJC • nI,T:CN COD[ ' [[IECT rv[ DAY [ WNCM I, Ifdg- AL _RED E. CARLSO,—ASSESSOR f TRACT N' 7393 Q 3 C L.- N.DE ANZA sae .c w0 Av I," ws, I I 42 43 � II ^ kL 1 1 PCL 2 J.367 AC NET I 2 230 AL WET I; PCL T I PCL 3 :.3is I -19B AC N° I -AC NET �0901 Of ANZA OLVO. i ' I I I 46c 44 al I I I I I 1 ilk i 1 I I I soon vw6c y ) 326 ei I I" zoo' < Z s P. M. y BLVD. t P. M. •+aa. �49'M•9 420•M•45 7mT-!E:ILL Q� ° 64 n y PCL 2 b � o� 1.51 AC. NET r .�: ?r v PCL.1 \ 0 2.08 AC. NET • o. 153 a i 7[I 7. D^ o--. BANDLEY 771..7 56 i4.00 AC. NET gF h Z W y 47 PACL. P. M. 357-M- I6 P M.344-M-10 ;BEARDON P. M. 249- M -9 I II OF F I C E OF COUNTY ASS E S S 0 R -- SAll TA CLARA COUNTY , CALI FORNIA LI H U O K P A G E 3 23 44 __ 27476 rtt0 09T 7C I i TiD l9 ]-1D.13 1 2017 r0 011 130 29 11 28 I 27 26 ( 25 I e • a 1)7 17 33 rt467 n B tI n Ix c•.I Itb ( ul'^ I 1n,1 1.j�ul 291 29 271 26`I �I COMMOH AREA —_i- 34L7 s c'�10- 8 2_ $1^ -1~--'�-- �, _ _ I — L �/ ! 1 I I I !� ASSESSED WITH UNITS o i•I l0 9 9 rc cll,+ocnA•' -IR _ �C3 7 ' — IG AJ S I l c,� Lt� °� s 6 y� L•• ?O kIc NI I I I Ir IYt007I 49 —�` LR, 5----.--.— C7 L_ZO 20607 20603 Au% 5 20617 R0515 r0391 LOT 48 L:oc• " rf lP 12 /2 zost,� 33 4 4 MAPLETREE (pN) PL.zz —i_ `�--JL^- ro63+ zaar� v676 2760e 20e76 _ �u.C97 24 24 oI raj r9�zo �—`J Q �- BY-6 'r ✓ -- 4005�40T91 rao—i91 -r-1I o9-j to I., ul I la 7t S O ,2a C! 23 a 1 't--- _t rTo Obi i 40 19, 1� 19 r0.r9-T20 01 1 I r .- ,2 I , _ _ _ I 23 rl "L I ` r---L` — 22 I 18 17 16 1 15 1 14 1 x BS.GT �i r°� g o1� 22 22 �I 1 1 ,4 I i IN �I ✓I yt 4x !�j� /.t 1 N / m la° �° 1 �w------- 3/ Fl 32 33 34 135 J W c . 2/ 21 I /B /7� /6I /5 I+14 _ Iti, I L to O 1c.33 Ps67 J sV j 1 ~ 1". la r. I..., Im 1 1.. �^. W 31 32 33 1 34 35 1-a�.i7� 20 20 a X� I 37.09 17.19 4.0.19 7019 2'y0i� p � �1,9 r—_`-� ---�1 C.��:L a l `�. I zoos I 11" �I Ir I.- I L*o!L_ko,!j `uli Lx0.19,:off CZ r O i a r I& Hrexr e�wr�ars }Ess a!" an • Z � (pvt I „ LANE CUPS TINO 5919 N CaIX/h r10 ut� SHADY OAK C7Ytx�J' Gr V Ids. Q _ A 15'�ev+ 5 .To_�s�.4 - CT'iC1M�Dt ofrn i. �t5 t Zt. u.reyl r� 20650 caao•1I r 2050 Z2a0.u190 eroc�&v � —t3o7a—t0m Z05M ros" Sr x3 o ear7r r��jF:.- -L- p1xoCIig "1, I red +i y L .✓ j _,o / 1 / I 1 n 1 41"43 144 145 1 46' �,• 4 f 36 I37_I 38 1 39 1 40 i 4/ 2 1I. ~'�I r�� m I W v ri �i I 36 37 1 38 39 1 40 1Y41 1 8 ')3 09 140 19 1 10." I6�.ce 1,. 1. l0.10 I— HOMESTEAD - I��' 1,J42 1 43 1 441 45 1 46 L47 —1✓JJ •,.�7 Yt 8K 326 _ "' ROAD I Z DDMRL[D IN Cb FoAMANCE YIITH SEC.SS7l a THE REVf %) S TAXATION CODE EFFECTIVE ATE •MARCH"'"' ALFRED E.0 RLSON —ASSESSOR -r,-_ OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR — SANTA C L A R A COUNTY, C A L I F 0 R N I A 43 I BOO K DRIVE---,309 to x21 os 1nc s4 P A G E " Al 43 42 24 oI 4 w 3'Q Io 25 E BLUE I 3 lu16 e`gCKH! 113 3 so 3,;, �= gwk z 1 I I • /4' Io /5 m I-to /6 Im ca /e29 cs 47 I 46 '2 In /7 / / —�� DSIVE 39 =2 4qi l�l 2 / s 48 a?5�431 49` Sol W/3 9 30 �41 1 2/ / 14 24 ; /Z _ to 10 40 pz J o/O 33 A69c113 3 7 38 Vzi - waN`r . c4/! �/c /6ie a/ I56/4 25 .o � Z 0 I t BI T TER '6?� �� � I 71 10- /N 36 ,' — — — — — I— a /efo c3 // m/°' ' `�o� ". 37, 57 0 I6 26 v e¢ a�C ' h- 0 D RIVE o AZ 0 , T6�B I&,�3� 4 ------ 0 JAY .i TRACT N° 3575 `f ce�x i7 27 00 h f- o _ _ 19 BERKELEY ESTATES I ` n74 -- - - -- Q $ 9 I"• 18 fa= J e 264.22 / 59 1 Zg O o 2.33 AC NET 38 R 0; -I too ` 40 J --too - o TRACT N°- 3576 00 a vc' " BERKELEY ESTATES UN. N° 2>_ Z $ 1 68 oLO 2 ff-0 m ALBATROSS —DR A >u � m n4 21 r 1c.s 0 V I O 1"-100' I TRACT N° 2541 ORCHARD GLEN 316 � =n r, n 0 N8�w I ► n W $_� z TRACT Ns 3606 HOMESTEAD COURT T N �CW ul �zC' O 299. G2 9310 ,22 50 i 4! R.O.S. 468 / /2 THRU /5 J S ` —•—f SARATOGA— SUNNYVALE ---:-- ROAD—f BK 323 9 City ojCupertino Department ojComnunity Development 10300 Torre,l venue, Cupertino. C-I 95014 WK :51-4505 Notice of .Public Hearing NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE MATTER DESCRIBED BELOW: Application No.: 17-U-90 (Modified) Applicant: Robert H. Lee & Assoc. Property Owner: Cupertino De Oro Club Location: 11010 De Anza Boulevard USE PERMIT to modify the square footage of an approved sales building, car wash and canopy and add one parking space. SAID APPLICATION WILL BE HEARD BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT THE HOUR OF 6:45 P.M. ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1993 IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS OF CITY HALL, 10300 TORRE AVENUE, CUPERTINO, AT WHICH TIME AND PLACE ALL PERSONS INTERESTED THEREIN MAY APPEAR AND BE HEARD ON SAID MATTER. THE AGENDA FOR THIS APPLICATION WILL BE AVAILABLE ON THE FRIDAY AFTERNOON PRECEDING THE MEETING. IF YOU CHALLENGE THE ACTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN . COURT, YOUMAYBE LIMITED TO RAISING ONLY THOSE ISSUIiS YOU OR SOMEONE ELSE RAISED AT 7HE PUBLIC HEARING DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE, OR IN WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE DELIVERED 7.0 THE CITY OFCUPERTINO AT, OR PRIOR TO. THE PUBLIC HEARING. *NOTE: ITEM MAY BE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. IF INTERESTED IN AN ITEM, PLEASE CALL PRIOR TO MEETING DATE TO VERIFY IF APPLICATION IS STILL ON THE AGENDA. Robert Cowan Director of Community Development 9/30/93 0 1�1 I certify that on this day I mailed the attached Notice of Public Hearing to all addresses as indicated on the attached certified mailing list as required by the appropriate ordinance of the City of Cupertino. misc/aff Assessors Parcel Number PROPERTY ADDRESS Book Page Parcel OWNER ADDRESS IF NOT OWNER OCCUPIED 309 42 001 KRUCKMEYER, KIRBY & PATRICIA 144 KIRBYHILL WAY SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 309 42 002 STOJA, PHYLLIS 150 KIRBYHILL WAY SUNNVALE, CA 94087 309 42 003 LEWIS, FLOYD & AILEE 154 KIRBY HILL WAY SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 309 42 026 LEE, JAMES & SUSAN OCCUPANT 13201 WRIGHT WAY 1643 LOCKSUNART WAY LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 309 42 027 JOHNSON, NORMAN & PH. OCCUPANT 1 102 MUIR COURT 1555 LOCKSUNART WAY ROSEVILLE, CA 95661 SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 309 42 028 NGUYEN, HIEU T. 149 LOCKSUNART WAY SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 309 42 029 ALMELEH, CRAIG J. & M.I. OCCUPANT 145 LOCKSUNART WAY 143 LOCKSUNART WAY SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 309 42 030 MARTUCCI, CATHERINE 0. OCCUPANT P.O. BOX 360822 139 LOCKSUNART WAY MILPITAS, CA 95036 SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 309 42 033 PENCO ASSN. OCCUPANT P.O. BOX 7534 170 LOCKSUNART WAY SAN JOSE, CA 95150 SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 309 42 036 MRB INVESTMENTS, INC. OCCUPANT P.O. BOX 2751 175 E. HOMESTEAD RD SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 316 01 025 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT OCCUPANT FOUR MAIN ST. 20445 VIA VOLANTE LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 LOS ALTOS, CA 95014 ATTN: JOHN DEL MARE 316 01 026 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT OCCUPANT FOUR MAIN ST. 20435 VIA VOLANTE LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 LOS ALTOS, CA 95014 ATTN: JOHN DEL MARE 1 certify that this is a true accurate list of property owners of parcels within 300 ft. of site perimeter. An incorrect mailing list and/or APN map/envelopes may invalidate the decision of the Planning Commission or City Council and result in the need to refile the application and payment of fee. Page 1 of 8 O er/ licant/Title Company f:\wp\8537.00\mail.lst Assessors Parcel Number PROPERTY ADDRESS Book Page Parcel OWNER ADDRESS IF NOT OWNER OCCUPIED 316 01 027 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT OCCUPANT FOUR MAIN ST. 20425 VIA VOLANTE LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 LOS ALTOS, CA 95014 ATTN: JOHN DEL MARE 316 01 028 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT OCCUPANT FOUR MAIN ST. 20415 VIA VOLANTE LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 LOS ALTOS, CA 95014 ATTN: JOHN DEL MARE 316 01 029 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT OCCUPANT FOUR MAIN ST. 20405 VIA VOLANTE LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 LOS ALTOS, CA 95014 ATTN: JOHN DEL MARE 316 01 030 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT OCCUPANT FOUR MAIN ST. 20395 VIA VOLANTE LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 LOS ALTOS, CA 95014 ATTN: JOHN DEL MARE 316 01 031 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT OCCUPANT FOUR MAIN ST. 30385 VIA VOLANTE LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 LOS ALTOS, CA 95014 ATTN: JOHN DEL MARE 316 01 032 FUNG,POON 20375 VIA VOLANTE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 316 01 033 PENG, DAVID & YING 20365 VIA VOLANTE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 316 01 034 CHEUNG, G. & S. 20355 VIA VOLANTE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 316 01 035 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT FOUR MAIN ST. LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 ATTN: JOHN DEL MARE 316 01 057 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT FOUR MAIN ST LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 ATTN: JOHN DEL MARE 316 01 058 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT FOUR MAINS ST LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 ATTN: JOHN DEL MARE I certify that this is a true accurate list of property owners of parcels within 300 ft. of site perimeter. An incorrect mailing list and/or APN map/envelopes may Invalidate the decision of the Planning Commission or City Council and result in the need to refile the application and payment of ye. Page 2 of 8 ner plicant/Title Company t:%v p\8537.00\mail.lst Assessors Parcel Number PROPERTY ADDRESS Book Page I Parcel OWNER ADDRESS IF NOT OWNER OCCUPIED 316 01 059 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT FOUR MAINS ST LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 ATTN: JOHN DEL MARE 316 01 060 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT FOUR MAINS ST LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 ATTN: JOHN DEL MARE 316 01 061 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT FOUR MAINS ST LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 ATTN: JOHN DEL MARE 323 44 009 MINAMI, KEIKO 11061 FIRETHORNE DR CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 010 LEE, S & M 11053 FIRETHORNE DR CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 011 DEL MOL, DIRK 11051 FIRETHORNE DR CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 019 WHITBY, WALTER T. 11016 HOLLY TREE LN CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 020 MERTOL, A. & N 11024 HOLLY TREE LN CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 021 LOFF, S. 11026 HOLLY TREE LN CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 022 CASTILLO, J. & C. 11034 HOLLY TREE LN CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 023 WELTE TRUST 11036 HOLLY TREE LN CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 1124 KRODEL PARTNERSHIP OCCUPANT 1696 QUAIL AVE 11044 HOLLY TREE LN SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 I certify that this is a true accurate list of property owners of parcels within 300 ft. of site perimeter. An incorrect mailing list and/or APN map/envelopes may invalidate the decision of the Planning Commission or City Council and result in the need to refile the application and payment ofjee. _ A Page 3 of 8 ner/ plicant/Title Company f:\wpM37.o0\mai1.1st 14 Assessors Parcel Number PROPERTY ADDRESS Book Page Parcel OWNER ADDRESS IF NOT OWNER OCCUPIED 323 44 038 HAMMONS, MARCIA J 20582 SHADY OAK LN CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 039 MENDEL, g. 20580 SHADY OAK LN CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 040 REICHENBERGER, D OCCUPANT 20475 SHADY OAK LANE 20572 SHADY OAK LN CUPERTINO, CA 95014 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 041 LOW, J. & E. 20510 SHADY OAK LN CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 042 SLATEN, LYNORE E 20552 SHADY OAK LN CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 043 DE LANEY, C OCCUPANT 10810 ASHBOURNE CT 20550 SHADY OAK LN CUPERTINO, CA 95014 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 044 BENNETT, A. & S. 20542 SHADY OAK LN CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 45 004 SRINIVASAN, K 11102 FIRETHORNE DR CUPERTINO, CA 95014 232 45 005 PAYNE, R. & K. 11112 FIRETHORNE DR CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 45 006 GUTWIRTH, C. 20507 CEDARBROOK TERR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 45 007 HITZL, L 20509 CEDARBROOK, TERR CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 45 008 HAYS, M.L. 20517 CEDARBROOK, TERR CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 45 009 VIDAL, S.M. 1 20519 CEDARBROOK TERR CUPERTINO, CA 95014 I certify that this is a true accurate list of property owners of parcels within 300 ft. of site perimeter. An incorrect mailing list and/or APN map/envelopes may invalidate the decision of the Planning Commission or City Council and result in the need to refile the application and payment of fgp. Page 4 of 8 "" 0/6er/Ajolicant7itle Company f:\wp\8537.00\mail.lst Assessors Parcel Number PROPERTY ADDRESS Book Page I Parcel OWNER ADDRESS IF NOT OWNER OCCUPIED 323 45 010 HWA, C. & K. 20527 CEDARBROOK TERR CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 45 011 VISTICA, S 20537 CEDARBROOK TERR CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 45 052 LARSON, C 20558 CEDARBROOK TERR CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 45 053 THOMAS, D. & P. 20556 CEDARBROOK TERR CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 45 054 BUSH R. OCCUPANT 1530 WAVERLY ST 11113 FIRETHORNE DR PALO ALTO, CA 94301 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 45 055 CHENG,L 11103 FIRETHORNE DR CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 45 056 MITCHELL, J. & E. 11093 FIRETHORNE DR CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 45 057 MALLEY, JAMES & MARY 10083 FIRETHORNE DR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 45 058 HOFF, J. & M. 11083 FIRETHORNE DR CUPERTINO, CA 95014 326 10 061 VIDOVICH, JOHN T. OCCUPANT 920 W. FREMONT AVE 10931 N DE ANZA BLVD SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 326 10 062 FRANCO, JOSEPH P. OCCUPANT 2277 ALUM ROCK AVE 21230 HOMESTEAD RD SAN JOSE, CA 95716 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 309 42 031 STROM & ASSOCIATES OCCUPANT 438 CAMBRIDGE AVE 120 LOCKSUNART WAY PALO ALTO, CA 94306 SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 309 42 032 PENCO ASSN. OCCUPANT P.O. BOX 7534 160 LOCKSUNART WAY SAN JOSE, CA 94750 SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 I certify that this is a true accurate list of property owners of parcels within 300 ft. of site perimeter. An incorrect mailing list and/or APN map/envelopes may invalidate the decision of the Planning Commission or City Council and result in the need to refile the application and payment o ee. Page 5 of 8 ne / ppl' ant/Title Company Mwp18537.00\mai1.lst Assessors Parcel Number PROPERTY ADDRESS Book Page I Parcel OWNER ADDRESS IF NOT OWNER OCCUPIED 309 42 039 CUPERTINO DE ORO CLUB OCCUPANT P.O. BOX 361 20441 E. HOMESTEAD ROAD CUPERTINO, CA 95015 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 309 42 040 CUPERTINO DE ORO CLUB OCCUPANT 255 BUSH ST. 11001 SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE RD. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 316 01 047 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT OCCUPANT FOUR MAINS ST 20356 VIA VOLANTE LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 316 01 048 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT OCCUPANT FOUR MAINS ST 20366 VIA VOLANTE LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 316 01 049 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT OCCUPANT FOUR MAINS ST 20376 VIA VOLANTE LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 316 01 050 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT OCCUPANT FOUR MAINS ST 20386 VIA VOLANTE LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 316 01 051 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT OCCUPANT FOUR MAINS ST 20396 VIA VOLANTE LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 316 01 052 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT OCCUPANT FOUR MAINS ST 20406 VIA VOLANTE LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 316 01 053 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT OCCUPANT FOUR MAINS ST 20416 VIA VOLANTE LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 01 054 LEAVELL, MICHAEL 20426 VIA VOLANTE 316 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 316 01 055 PORTOFINO DEVELOPMENT OCCUPANT FOUR MAINS ST 20436 VIA VOLANTE LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 316 01 122 MARIAM GROUP COMPANIES FOUR MAN STREET LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 323 36 018 SVILICH, RICH OCCUPANT 3860 REPOSA AVE. 11025 SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE RD. SANTA CRUZ, CA 95062 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 I certify that this is a true accurate list of property owners of parcels within 300 ft. of site perimeter. An incorrect mailing list and/or APN map/envelopes may invalidate the decision of the Planning Commission or City Council and result in the need to refile the application and payment ofspe, Page 6 of 8 0 ner/ pp icant/Title Company f:\wp\8537.00\mail.lst r L Assessors Parcel Number PROPERTY ADDRESS Book Page I Parcel OWNER ADDRESS IF NOT OWNER OCCUPIED 323 44 001 GALLO,RONALD 11030 FIRETHORNE DR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 002 YAP, FUNG Y. 11032 FIRETHORNE DR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 003 MC NICOL, PAUL B. OCCUPANT 140 S. GORDON WAY 11040 FIRETHORNE DR. LOS ALTOS, CA 94022 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 004 PENNY, MARLENE OCCUPANT 10971 NORTHSKY SQ. FIRETHORNE DR. CUPERTINO, CA 05014 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 005 BONELLI, STEPHEN DR OCCUPANT 11050 FIRETHORNE DR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 006 ELLIMAN, ROBERT & M.A. OCCUPANT 11052 FIRETHORNE DR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 007 CORNELL, LOIS E. 11060 FIRETHORNE DR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 008 VASILIADES, MICHAEL A. 11062 FIRETHORNE DR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 012 MARSHALL, LILLIAN L. 11043 FIRETHORNE DR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 013 SHAW, KATHLEEN K. OCCUPANT 1696 QUAIL AVE. 11041 FIRETHORNE DR. SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 014 BAILEY, JOE C. OCCUPANT 20531 SHADY OAK LANE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 015 SHALLENBERGER, FRANK OCCUPANT 1100 ALMA ST. 210 20533 SHADY OAK LANE MENLO PARK, CA 94025 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 I certify that this is a true accurate list of property owners of parcels within 300 ft. of site perimeter. An incorrect mailing list and/or APN map/envelopes may invalidate the decision of the Planning Commission or City Council and result in the need to refile the application and payment of fe . Page 7 of 8 Ow /A ca !Title Company f WPW537.00\mail.lst Assessors Parcel Number PROPERTY ADDRESS Book Page Parcel OWNER ADDRESS IF NOT OWNER OCCUPIED 323 44 045 MANGOLD, GILDA C. OCCUPANT 20540 SHADY OAK LANE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 046 HWANG, YUN-SHENG & C.H. 20532 SHADY OAK LANE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 047 CLAY, WILLIAM & RACH 20530 SHADY OAK LANE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 45 001 CONNER,LOUIS OCCUPANT 920 ROCKEFELLER DR 11072 FIRETHORNE DR. SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 CUPERTINO. CA 95014 323 45 002 PENG, CHIH-LEN C. OCCUPANT P.O. BOX 33097 11082 FIRETHORNE DR. LOS GATOS, CA 95031 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 45 003 OLOUMI, JALIL 11092 FIRETHORNE DR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 326 10 059 OYAMA, WRIGHT OCCUPANT 1 4125 BLACKFORD AVE. 250 10001 N. DE ANZA BLVD. A SAN JOSE, CA 95117 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 • I certify that this is a true accurate list of property owners of parcels within 300 ft. of site perimeter. An incorrect mailing list and/or APN map/envelopes may Invalidate the decision of the Planning Commission or City Council and result in the need to refile the application and payment of fee._ Page 8 of 8 Ow r Ap I' antlfitie Company Mwp18537.00\mail.1st RETURN NOTICE'OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR APPLICATION 17-U•90 (Modified) 3264N, OCC 21 RD C P96014 1 42 04 1 E. HO AD C ERTI O A 9 014 �l�G t� L-A :ti7nL 31 Ot 03 CUPA 0395 A V TE LOS TOS C 5014� 3 8 01 05 CUPA 0416 A VO NTE UPE NO, C 95 14 318 027 O PAN 425 A VO NT 141,7, 4 1%1:, A OS OS, C 14 t/T �1 INl �7�G 3 0102 CCUP , 204 VIA E L ALTO 5014 31601 26 OCC AN 204 5 V VOL -� t'l0*i.,Ls�: LO A OS, C 95 4 323 44 004 t: vT�R� fair OCCUPANT 1"1�S FIRETHORNE DR. `\ CUPERTINO, CA 95014 318 01 028 \ OCCUPANT T 20415 VIA VOLANTE AO LOS ALTOS, CA g5014 it,/TCi F �41 _ �C• 309 42 040 OCCUPANT 11001SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE RD. SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 318 O6 O CUP T 0436 IA OLA 1 CUP TIN , CA 014 rVl7}'1. 323 44 041 LOW, J. & E. 2051 O SHADY OAK LN CUPERTINO, CA 95014 309 42 040 CUPERTINO DE ORO CLUB 255 BUSH ST. SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104 31601 031 OCCUPANT 30385 VIA VO TE LOS ALTOS, CA 316 01 029 OCCUPANT 20406 VIA VOLANTE LOS ALTOS, CA VW'F QIEQ C ISST FOR RE'MUNG TO AM CM FXHQHITS SURVMD kM NEW A_» TCATIONS (Send Full Sized bfiihi is Only). File No.: (T U-ic,(Nc d) Initials: Acgencies3 Notified Date: #C(Nii r Central Fire District (Full sized EMAbits) ✓ Cupertino sanitary District County Health Department ✓ P.G.&E. V Pacific Telephone _ Cupertino School District • Fremont Union High School District ✓ RAACPD _ Foothill/DeAnza Calm mitt' College District _ San Jose Water Co. California Water Co. Cupertino Water Dept. ✓ Los Altos Garbage Co. Santa Clara County Sheriff • Neighborhood/Homeowners Assoc. ry - City of Cupertino Post Office Midpeninsula Open Space District United Cable TV Corp. City Planning Dept. �p County Planning Department Department of Transportation mist/agencies n n^I V /�w 'n' �C�.KJGX�A 1, /(�,��N • Cites of Cupertino 103W Tone Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: 1408) 2S2.4505 rAx: (408) 212-0753 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT August 30, 1993 Robert Picard Robert H. Lee & Associates 1137 N. McDowell Blvd. Petaluma, CA 94954 RE: Use Permit 17-U-90 (Modified) 11010 N. DeAtim Blvd. Cupertino Dear Mr. Picard: P.O. Box 580 Cupertino, CA 9S015.0580 Your application for conditional use permit has been received and the following public hearing dates for your attendance have been tentatively scheduled: Pre-Flcaring Review: Wednesday, September 8, 1993, 8:30 a.m. Cont Rm. C. (Cupertino City Hall) Architectural and Site Approval Committee: Monday, September 13, 1993, 7:30 p.m., Con[ Rat. A (Cupertino City Hall) Planning Commission: Monday, October 11, 1993, 6:45 p.m. City Council Chambers (Cupertino City Hall) These dates arc tentative based upon the completeness of your application. The completeness of your Is application will be determined at the Prc•hcaring review meeting. ►f you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (408) 2524505, Ext. 277. l , q rc*I Michele Bjurman Project Manager MB/ylk c: Doris Hijrrlans Cupertino DcCro Club 23311 Mora Glen Drive Los Altos, CA 94024 g/nu7 /Icticrs/Lcc2 0- �ti��. __ � i•1� :lily_.+�.! • o� y a. ggencies Notified Central Fire District (Full sized Exhibits) Cupertino sanitary District V/ County Health Department V/ P.G.&E. Pacific Telephone Cupertino School District Fremont Union Hiah school District m BAAWD Foothill/DeAnza Community College District San Jose Water Co. California Water Co. Cupertino Water Dept. Los Altos Garbage Co. Santa Clara County sheriff Neighborhood/HmieownessAssoc. ____ City of Cupertino Post Office Midpeninsula open space District United Cable TV Corp. City Planningf- Dept. _, County Planning Department Department of Transportation misc/agencies CITY OF CUPERTINO 103W Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 252-1505 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT To: Prc-Hearing Review Committee Members County of Santa Clara Sheriff's Department - Lt. Huber Building Department - Greg Castccl Sanitary District - Carl Beckham Fire: Department - Tom Torncll Public Works - Hcrmie Bacus From: Michele Bjurman, Community Development Department • Date: August 30, 1993 Rc: Prc-Hearing Review Mecting of September 8, 1993 8:30 a.m. Conference Room C 1. Application No.(s): 8-U-93 Applicant: Ruchi India Cuisine Property Owner: TCW Realty Fund III Property Location: 19700 Stevens Creek Blvd. USE PERMIT for a 90-scat restaurant in an existing shopping center. 2. Application No.(s): 9-U-93 Applicant: Pacific College of Acupressure Property Owner: Emilc Nijmeh Property Location: 19997 SCB #1 USE PERMIT for an Acuprcssurc/Massagc School 3. Application No.(s): 17-U-90 (Modified) Applicant: Robot H. Lee & Associates Property Owner: Cupertino De Oro Club Property Location: 11010 De Ama Blvd. USE PERMIT to modify the square footage of an approved sales building, car wash and canopy and add one parking space. gtmm/mcmostph98 CITY OF CUPERTINO NEGATIVE DECLARATION As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1973, and amended on March 4, 1974, January 17 1977, May 1, 1978, and July 7, 1980, the following described project was granted a Negative Declaration by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 8-EA-93 Application No.(s): 17-U-90 (Modified) ` c Applicant: Robert H. Lee & Associates Property Owner: Cupertino De Oro Club • Location: 11010 De Anza Boulevard USE PERMIT to modify the square footage of an approved sales building, car wash and canopy and add one parking space. The City Council granted a Negative Declaration since the project is consistent with the General Plan and there is no significant environmental impacts. • Robert Cowan Director of Community Development This is to certify that the above Negative Declaration was filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on - 1993. City Clerk g:\mm\erc\neg8ea93 CITY OF CUPERTINO Department of Planning & oovolopmont 10300 Two Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 252.4642 :Staff UseiOnly.a, EA File No. ______________ Case File No(s). ______-______ PROJECT DESCRIPTION Attachments? PROJECT TITLE CHEVRON SERVICE STATION 9-5700 PROJECT LOCATION 11010 DE ANZA BOULEVARD AND HOMESTEAD ROADS PROJECT DESCRIPTION REMOVE EXISTING UNDERGROUND TANKS AND ARnVF CRrVTND BUILDINGS, AND CONSTRUCT NEW SERVICE STATION WITH A FOOD MART AND CAR WAS ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING EXISTING SFRVTCF STATTON INCLUDES GROVE OF DTSFASFD AND DYING TREES. PROJECT STATISTICS Silo Area (ac.) .8 Building Coverage 6 % Exist. Building 1600 s.t. Proposed Bldg. 7456 s.f. COMMERCIAL one PLAN.GEN. GP Designation GEN. COMM Assessors Parcel No. 309 - 42 --iL It Residential, Units/Gross Acre Applicable Special Area Plans: (Check) Total No. Rental? Bedrooms Total s.f. Price [=] Monta Vista Design Guidelines Unit Type,pl N. De Anza Conceptual Unit -Type #2 S. De Anza Conceptual Unit Type #3 S. Sara -Sunny Conceptual Unit Type #4 [J Stvns. Crk. Blvd. Conceptual Unit Type #5 Stvns. Crk. Blvd. SW & Uscape II Non -Residential, Building Area Z4%0 s.f. FAR .07 Max. Employees/Shift 2 Parking Required- 8 Parking Provided 17 Project site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area Yes X No INITIAL STUDY-SOURCE11ST/ ..-,. . . A) GENERAL PLAN SOURCES 1) - Cupertino General Plan, Land User Element 2) ,Cupertino General Plan. Public Safety Element 3) Cupertino General Plan. Housing Element 41 " Cupertino General Plan, Circulation Element 5) - Cupertino General Plan. Env'xonmonlal Rosourws .Element 6) Cupertino Genet. Plan, Appendix A — H:Ilsido Duvdop- menl 7) Cupertino General Pan, Land Usu Map ` • - a)', • City Ridgoline Policy 9) NoiseElement Amendment 10) Cupertino General Plan Constraint Maps - B) CUPERTINO SOURCE DOCUMENTS, it) TaooPreservation Ordinance778- 12) City Aerial Photography Maps - 13)"-Cuportino Clronido'(Caliifornia History Center, 1976) 14) Geological Report (sits specific) 15) Parking Ordinance 1277 ' 16) Zoning Map 17) Zoning Codo/Spocilic Plus Documents C)'. CITY AGENCIES 19) -Cupertino Planning 8 CommunityDevolopmonl DopL 19►, Cupertino Public Works DopL 20)'- ,Cupertino Parks 3 Recreation Department 21) Cupertino Water U"y D) OUTSIDE AGENCIES 22), County Planning Department 23)', Adjacent City's Planning Department 24) County Department of Environmental Health 25) MidPoninsula Rogional Open Space District 26) County Parks and Recreation Department 27) Cupertino Sanitary District 28) ' Cupertino Union School District " 28)- Fremont Union High School District 30) Pacific Gas &'Electric Company " 31) Central Fire District ^ 32) County Shand" 33) CALTRANS' 34) County Transportation Agency " 35) Santa Clara Valley Water District E) , OUTSIDE" AGENCY. DOCUMENTS 36) BAACMO Survey of Contaminard Excesses 37) FEMA Flood'Maps/SCVWD Flood Maps_ 38) USDA, 'Soils of Santa Clara County', - 39) County Hazardous Waste Management Plan 40) County Heritage Resources Inventory, F)' OTHER SOURCES . 41) - Project Plan Sat/Application Materials 42) Feld Reconnaissance" 43) Exporienoo with project of similar aeopo/ characteristics 44) City Noise Ordinance 45) ABAG Projections Series 'INSTRUCTIONS 1) Complete all Information requested on the Initial Study -cover' pago. • 'LEAVE BLANK SPACES ONLY WHEN A SPECIFIC ITEM IS NOT APPLI- CABLE. 2) Consult the Initial Study Source List: use the materials listed therein to complete lho checklist information in Categories A through 0. You are encouraged to cite, other. relevent sources, it such sources are used; Jotlnttielrlfth (s)Intho'Sou�co' tbtumn next to the question to which they relate. 3)" It you check any of the "YES" responses to any ques- tion, you must attach a sheet explaining the potential impact and suggest mitigation if needed: 4) When explaining any YES response, label your answer clearly (Example: • N- 3. Hisloricar) Please try to respond concisely, and place as many explanatory responses as possible on�pnge- 5) Upon completing the checklist, sign and data the Preparer's Affidavit. 6) Please attach the following materials before submitting the Initial Study to the City: - - • ProjoctPlanSet orLegislative Document (1,copy) - Location map with silo deafly, marked (whop appgcablo) z' It1= SURE YOUR INITIAL STUDY SUBMITTAL k1i COMPLETE -- INCOMPLETE MATERIALS MAY CAUSE PROCESSING DELAYS Y IMPACT YES WILL THE PROJECT... SOURCE Not sgtura9nt Sgtursaot Cumutah Spmkant (Mdgation (No Ropocod) Mdgatoon Ptopaod) A) LAND USE/GENERAL PLAN 1) Require a change from the land use designation for ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ the subject site in the General Plan? 1,7,18 2) Require a change of zoning? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 16,18 3) Require a change or variance from an adopted ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ spq.cilic plan other adopted policy statement? 17,18 4) Result in substantial change in the present land use ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ " of the site or that of adjoining properties? 7.12. 6) Disrupt or divide the physical configuration of an 0 ❑ ❑ established neighborhood? 7, 12, 23,42 7) Conflict with established recreational, educational, ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ religious or scientific activities in the project vicinity? 7,12,16 B) GEOLOGIC/SEISMIC HAZARD 1) Be located in an area which has potential for major ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ geologic hazard? 2, 14 2) Be located on or adjacent to a known earthquake ❑ ❑ ❑ fault? 2.14 3) Be located in a Geologic Study Zone? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 4) Be located in an area of soil instability (subsidence, landslide, shrink/swell, soil creep or severe ero- ® ❑ ❑ ❑ sion)? 2, 5, 10 5) - - Cause- substantial erosion or siltation of a water- ® ❑ ❑ ❑ . 2, 5, 10 course? 6) Cause substantial disruption, displacement, corn- paction or overcovering of soil either on -site or off-- ® 2, 14, 41 site? 7) Cause substantial change in topography or in a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 12,41 ground surface feature? 8) Involve construction of a building, road or septic tit tit ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 6, 12, 41 system on a slope of 10% or greater? C) RESOURCES/PARKS 1) Increase the existing removal rate, or result in the removal of a natural resource for commercial pur- poses (including items such as rock, sand, gravel, ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ trees, minerals or topsoil)? 5.10 2) Result in the substantial depletion of any non-renew- ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 5 3) able natural resource? Convert prime agricultural land (Class I or It soils) to non-agricultural use or impair the agricultural pro- ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 5.35 ductivity of nearby prime agricultural land? 4) Involve lands currently protected under the William- ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 5,18 son Act or any Open Space easement? 5) Substantially affect any existing agricultural uses? 0 7,16 IMPACT YES ... W1 L L THE PROJECT �^yN-� '�+ S Q U R C E No, spn, Sgn I" cumulaar - Sigmlu�n� (Miupauon (No Proposod( Mnpanan P(oposod) 6) Be located on, within or near a public or private recreation facility, park, wildlife preserve, public trail either in existence already or planned for future ® 0 Q Q Q 5, 10, 12, 22, 25 implementation? D) SEWAGE/WATER QUALITY 1) Result in aseptic field being constructed on soil with ® severe drainfield performance limitations? 0 6,19 2) Result in a septic field being located within 50 feet of a drainage swale or within 100 feet of any well, water course or water body? ® 0 Q 35, 41. 42 3) Result in extensionof a sewermain linewith capacity to serve new development? ® Q Q Q 19,41 4) Substantially degrade surface or ground waterqual- ily, or the public water supply? ® Q Q Q 19, 35. 36 5) Be located In an area of water supply concem (such as low fire flows)? ® 0 0 0 19.31 E) DRAINAGE/FLOODING 1) Interfere substantially with ground water recharge? ® Q 0 0 19.35 2) Substantially change the direction, rate of flow or quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? ® 0 0 0 19, 35. 41 3) Change the absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate/amount of surface runoff? �] ® 0 Q 0 19.35 4) Involve a natural drainage channel or streambed or water course such as to alter the location, course or flow of its waters? Q Q Q Q 35, 41, 42 5) Be located in a Iloodway or floodplain Area? 0 Q Q Q 37 F) _,FLORA AND FAUNA 1) Significantly affect fish, wildlife, reptiles or plant life by changing the diversity or numbers of existing species, or by introducing new species, or by ® restricting migration or movement? 0 =1 0 0 5, 2) Substantially reduce the habitat area for fish, ani- mals or plants? ® 0 0 5, 10 3) Change the existing habitat, food source or nesting place for a rare or endangered specie of plants or animals? 5,10 4) Involve construction within 100 feet of a riparian ® area? 0 0 0 10, 41, 42 5) Involve cutting/removal of specimen scale trees, whether indigenous to the site or introduced? 0 0 11, 41, 42 is IMPACT YES WILL THEPROJECT... SOURCE Na Spnfkani SpNfiwN CumWativ SpNrrant (W p hon Propotao) (No u,1WWW Propocod) G) TRANSPORTATION 1) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system? ® 0 0 4, 19, 33 2) Cause any public or private street intersection to function below Level of Service D? ® 0 4.19 3) Increase traffic hazards to pedestrians, bicyclists and vehicles? ® 0 0 r^—� ,t—.J 19,32 4) Adversely affect access to commercial establish- ments, public buildings, schools, parks or other pe- ® 0 destrian oriented activity areas? t_ J 10, 19 5) Cause a reduction in public transportation service at ® 0 0 or near the project site? 34 6) Increase demand upon existing parking facilities, or engender demand for new parking space? 18.41 7) Inhibit use of alternative modes of transportation to ® 0 0 private automobile usage?- 5, 19, 33, 34 H) HOUSING 1) Reduce the supply of affordable housing in the community, or result in the displacement of persons from their present home? ® 0 3, 18 2) Increase the cost of housing in the area, or substan- tially change the variety ofhousing types found inthe ® 0 0 3.18 3) community? Create a substantial demand for new housing? Q 3, 18, 45 1) HEALTH & SAFETY 1) Involve the application, use, disposal or manufacture • r✓ t C7 of potentially hazardous materials? 31, 39, 41 2) Involve risk of explosion or other forms of uncon- trolled release of hazardous substances? 0 0 31.43 3) Involve the removal or continued use of any existing, or installation of any new underground chemical or 0 4) fuel storage tank? Be located in an area of seasonal fire danger? 31, 41, 42 2,31 5) Employ technology which could adversely affect public safety in the event of a breakdown? ® 41.43 6) Provide breeding grounds for mosquitos or other disease vectors? ® O Q O 24 J) AIR QUALITY 1) Create objectionable odors? 0 0 41.43 2) Violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation, or expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations of pollutants? 0 5, 36, 41 IMPACT YES WILL THEPROJECT... SOURCE s µp �, Jc Cumulauv "Oposod) JNo Mdpaonn Nopoaad) K) NOISE 1) Increase substantially the ambient noise environ- ment of the project vicinity during construction of the project? ® 0 0 2) Result in a sustained increase in ambient noise levels 9, 41 in the project vicinity following construction of the project? ® 0 9, 41 3) Result in sustained noise levels beyond the thresh- olds of sound energy and duration limits contained in the City's Noise Ordinance? ® Q Q Q Q 9.44 L) AESTHETICS 1) Be generally in conformance with applicable design gpidelines? 0 2) Create an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 0 IlSJ 17,41 3) Visually intrude upon an area of natural scenic quali- ties? 41,42 4) Obstruct view of a scenic ridgeline visibile from the valley floor? 5,42 5) Obstruct views of the city's adjacent hillsides from residential areas or public lands ® 0 5 8, 10, 22, 24, 41 6) Adversely affect the architectural character of an established neighborhood or business district? 41,42 7) Produce glare from artilieial lighting sources upon adjacent properties or public roadways? ® Q 0 41,43 M) ENERGY 1) Involve the use of unusually large quantities of fossil fuels or non-renewable energy sources? 5,41 2) Rem6vevegetalionprovidingsummer shade orwind- breaks to an existing or proposed building? ® Q .Q Q . Q 41,42 3) Significantly reduce solar access to an adjacent. building, public recreation space or private yard? r—� 41, 42 N) HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL 1) Be located in an area of potential archeaological or paleontological resources? 10, 42 2) Affect adversely a property of historic or cultural significance to the community, except as part of a scientific study? r� ILA Q Q 1, 18, 41, 43 49 C, IMPACT YES WILL THEPROJECT... SOURCE �y� NO No! Sgnlbnt Swod�uhn! CumuWu, $gmboanl !utpawn IFW Pwpusdd) 1.61,04iaon Ptoµtsad) O) PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES 1) Produce solid waste to substantial quantities? l!_�J 0 0 L_I 41 2) Induce substantial growth, or alter the location, distri- bution, or density of the human population of an area? ® (-] 1.45 3) Cause substantial impact upon, or increase the need for: a) Fire Protection Services? 18.31 b) Police Services? 32 c) Public Schools? ® O r--1 O 0 28,29 d) ParRsiRecreation Facilities? r-7z-1 0 O 0 5, 17, 19, 26 e) Maintenance of Public Facilities? Gam l 18. 19, 41 1) Other Governmental Services? 171" 18 4) Cause substantial impact upon existing utilities or infrastructure in the following categories: a) Electricity? C] 30.41 b) Natural Gas? C7 G7 O O 30.41 c) Water? Lam] 17.7 O 0 O 21 d). Sewage treatment and disposal? 18.41 e) Storm water management? 35.36 5) Generale demand for use of any public facility which causes that facility to reach or exceed Its capacity? [:T�,] Q (� �.. [�. 18, 41, 43 MANDATORY FINDINGSOR"SIGNIFICgNCE •:ta!e�g.. �� ,■ 'a V�iG iw" i�' rr, •" yr,',� . ' (To 0s Cc!nipoJ by Clly S:dl)'..' , :,y � „�. WILL THE PROJECT... YES NO 1) Have the potential to degrade substantially the quality of the environment, to substantially diminish the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, to cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below ICI self-sustaining levels, to threaten or eliminate a plant or animal community. to reduce the number 1� I or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California's history or prehistory? 2) Have the potential to achieve short term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long term environmental goals? 3) Nave environmental impacts which are individually limited, but are cumulatively considerable? ('Cumulatively considerable' means that the incremental effects of an individual project are Ili substantive when viewed in conjunction with the effects of past projects, the effects of other I I current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) 4) Have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse Impacts on human beings, either directly or indirectly? LtJ ,':. �;.`' Y; yt `, s ;:.: >►� .° i PREPA�RER'S�tAFFIDAVIT" s i }�" r t,,.r�{ ,� . ,,t., tj.•c,y;,, ,.f sir. 3. • ,� �•<Ft�wTI a {$i P.P , . I hereby certify that the Information provided In this Initial Study Is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief; 1 cenify that I have used proper diligence In responding accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted appro- priate source references when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. thereby acknowledge that any substantial errors detected within this Initial Study may cause cause delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and hereby agree to hold harmless the City of Cupenino,its staff and authorized agents, from the consequences of such delay or discontinuance. Preparer's Signature Dale 9-14-93 Print Preparer's Name IIELEN LORETO 'ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION !!.:PACT AREAS: ❑ Land Use/General Plan ❑ Ge.l.gic/Seismic Hazard ❑ -Resources/ Parks ❑ Housing ❑ Sewage/Water Quality ❑ Drainage/flooding ❑ Flora & Fauna ❑ Transportation ❑ Historical/Archaeological ❑ Health & Safety ❑ Air Quality ❑ Noise ❑ Historical/Geological ❑ Public Services/Utilities ❑ Energy ❑ Aesthetics STAFF EVALUATION On the basis of this Initial Study, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) finds: Select., One That the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and recommends that a NEGATIVE DECLARATION be granted. q•s' . . .ir That although the project could have a significant effect onthe environment,nosignificant effect will occur because mitigation measures are included in the project. ERC recommends that a NEGATIVE �•; �, n DECLARATION be granted. "^ That the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and recommends that an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT be prepared.,: Staff Evaluator ERC Chairperson Date Dale n LJ n i� LEGAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA, on the 1 Ith day of October, 1993 at 6:45 PM in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue is hereby given. The following applications for action by the Planning Commission will be heard: I. Application No.: 8-U-93 Applicant: Prabhakar R. Gudur Property Owner: TCW Realty Fund III Holding Company Location: 19700 Stevens Creek Boulevard USE PERMIT for a 90-scat restaurant in an existing shopping center. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Categorically Exempt 2. Application No.: 9-U-93 Applicant: Peter Hou Property Owncr: Emile Nijmch Location: 19997 Stevens Creek Boulevard USE PERMIT for an acupressurc/massage school. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Categorically Exempt 3. Application No.: 17-U-90 (Modified) Applicant: Robert H. Lee & Assoc. Property Owner: Cupertino De Oro Club Location: 11010 De Anza Boulevard USE PERMIT to modify the square footage of an approved sales building, car wash and canopy and add one parking space. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: Categorically Exempt If you challenge the action of the Planning Commission in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Cupertino at, or prior to, the public hearing. Robert S. Cowan Director of Community Development Publication Date: September 8, 1993 g:4m legaMnlo-11 Citm of Ctiperti"o 10300 Tone Avenue P.O. Eloz 580 Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Cupertino, CA 95015-0580 Telephone: (408) 252-4505 FAX: (408) 252-0753 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT September 1, 1993 Application No.: 17-U-90 (Modified) • Applicant: Robert H. Lee & Assoc. Property Owner: Cupertino De Oro Club Location: 11010 De Anza Boulevard USE PERMIT to modify the square footage of an approved sales building, car wash and canopy and add one parking space. The City of Cupertino has received the subject application and has scheduled a hearing regarding this matter before the Planning Commission at the meeting of October 11, 1993. A copy of the Exhibit describing the proposed project is enclosed for your review. Please forward any comments to this office within 10 days from the date noted above. Further . information is available from the Department of Community Development (408) 252-4505. Michele l3jurman Community Development Department g:�mrnVegab\ag17u90 4b 11 CITY OF CUPS TIM NEGATIVE DECfARAZION March 18, 1991 As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1973, and amended on Mardi 4, 1974, January 17, 1977, May 1, 1978, and July 7, 1980, the following described project was granted a Negative Declaration by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on March 18, 1991. J:.! ID}1 � �.rC •JY b���17 �•:d:VYt� �1 Application 25-EA-90 Application No.(s) 17-U-90 Applicant Chevron Research/TIechnoloov Co. Property Owner Cupertino De Oro Club Location Northeast corner of Homestead Road and De Anza Blvd, USE PERnrr to demolish existing service station improvements and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 1,500 s.f. of building area encmpassing a food market and car wash, with related site inprovev eats. Mimi • • a•} •.w�: �• • The City Council granted a Negative Declaration since the project is consistent with the General Plan and there is no significant environmental inlpact.S . QA& GWC" Robert Cm -ran Director of Co m unity Development CERIMCATE OF THE CITY CLETIIC This is to certify that the above Negative Declaration was filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Cupertino on , 1991. City Clerk erc\neg25ea EOOO666 0 FILED 91 DEC 9 1,11 : 42 COL,, BY,_ NMCE OF DMEMnUMU CN Y Application 17-U-90 Chevron Research/Technology Co. (Cupertino De Oro Club) At their meting of march le, 1991, the City Council of the City of Cupertino considered an application for a use permit filed by Chevron Research/Technology Co.. The project is located at the northeast corner of Homestead Road and DeAnza Boulevard. The Project is described as a Use Permit to dewlish existing service station inprovements and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 1,500 sq. ft. of building area encoapassing a food market and car wash, with related site ioprovenents. The decision of the City Council was to approve said project. The Planning Commission, by filing a Negative Declaration on this project on December 4, 1991 has determined that the project will not have a significant impact upon the environment and therefore, no Enviromnental. DrVact Report has been prepared. The Negative Declaration has been prepared pursuant to the provisions of State and City guidelines. A copy Of said Negative Declaration is available in the office of the City Clerk, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California. Roberta Wolfe Deputy City Clerk City of Cupertino a.2 0 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE Or. FEE EXEMPTION Je Minimis Impact Finding .Project Title/Location Name and Address of Project Proponent (include county): ADDlicatiOns 25-EA-90 and 17-U-90: Chevron Research/Technology Co. - Use Permit to demolish existing service station improvements and reconstruct a new self service fuel station with 1500 sq.ft. of building area encompassing a food market and car wash, with related site improvements. Site is located at northeast corner of Homestead Road & De Anza Blvd. Project Description: Use Permit demolishing existing service station improvements and reconstructing new self service fuel station, with. related site improvements. Findings of Exemption (attach required findings): 1) The City completed an Initial Study which contains no evidence of any impact to the fisheries or wildlife habitat of the community .and surrounding region. 2) No new increment of demand for recreational use of fish and wildlife resource areas is anticipated. certification: I hereby certify that the lead agency has made the above findings of fact and that based upon the initial study and hearing record the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. (Che Pla�►ni�c Official) o ert o an Title: Director, Community Dev. Lead Agency Cit o Cu ertino Date lI /ic i Oa —BLUE JAY—•--DRIVE•-L o7tICL or COUNTY ASSE5504• - - .S.NTA CL.AA county, LALItoAI.1A ;_j _ ►004 I.OL TR AC Nt 6325. ►ORTOIINO UNIT Nt1 ie _• ,'il'''�irt Y R�,r'�-e.�:_,---j•�ir 3I3 it'•AC�C. I --- JO --_a - II°y ISn 16�I jS119 i 144147l°el °9150%sl lsz lsi !sai s5 Via_ •• �s I 1 i?'�i1f3 T. t1 a 7, I a s 1 1 t i�- ez I00 1'.Ioo' W i 1 ,.• F �- IN 1t�✓" �dt i�i �71 �7�i i�i� Y h 73 I 1 w�, .:SLL�JI L?L '�LLL111TL1t•� j �7 e3! eLA I a.> 1 tC }43-"\ sow.ace7o �__ �z,� 9°�"n a ..,. •.,. CKH z . I - - .... _ - E�-rrp a '",-r .•. r- ` hlPd 6°a a d tI Co. MON X 61 ---(L_r ,__Q : j• Yr 13 J I IaJLu__q t�,. dL.ra__a t $ ,s 1,• . '• �� r-- t lz •IP' 1 a AREA et •A 44 �1 R �.tla�1i79 NJ,�i t e•�.• BOO _ 314, , DRIVE..t r 1 Jta-- p ^ /7 I l , I 0�r� �-_"--•- ."-- ° li� 1 90 J1fL--"; •t IB 1@ l " Tt� - ' 1 r t zz I a at.c 4 °y �7 : g?I x:7a 7e ,Q3y '+-Tr'.'3 ;: '--� v : r='a- 1 Sd' a 6-- a Ju=-- au e74 Pµq� OI •^} �._, v / / 1 / / / -- 1 -1 10 L4 y e--- 4 z� 1 AIY U ,a 7T o,� d 30 1 a,T- / L 's 11 _ 1. .� raLL__y �- zap Cl �� a �- s9'4.J•.7 aL3UaBj 1 .•-r_ y-..1 , 2► 1' u--�.--- Y �S P1 �,'-- Vie+ ssr `3 aff "� �e b'�•CC�yn�+ Lrii,�i HIGHWAY 28 • _ , A „�� _ iutr_1•�i > . s '-----ry tee. 2P w fi + 1 �_ / 54 r-�_9.. ° i - :. I T7 Zi �o > Sys ,1?yr'ffi 61 / -- C4-to .. .. , , d = f _= e " - ---- .- v C 'tax--'!� •3 zc It `RA/ '•.. .. / , ! a ,E ray9z/ -4 1 3 d _I 63 / a 72 s ✓9----� �p • • c;' =o ° r - - ' u - - = •1 r t= a r J• 2! i 36 ' a p�ffi 6° -Ti UZ 5� 2 RIVe ff a:_9 21.29 y° O TRACT Nt 3575 t - C•=- �= a'• If • 14�C� d i'L° i�i f''S-I-�-�,- �l 95 {� ' IKELEY ESTATES I = - -•- - 7 $ 2 . v-=U=•+/ / 3° 22 66 69 o o I 7 i iiiJ�1 67z�""- 961 - , __t• ... Y. ' !9 �1 _ 56t�gJ r .n u'L'6e- y 's7� z..AC. • ' 2 33 AC NET i W ���`I-1 Y� , Blgp/ a — J U N I P E R O SERF y L� 1(n-�'i.. .� LTt'-i. R'TZIr+,ai .w's6�(r .Tr ntr -'i,Z�i 1�jLr• W y0 ?` t —+= —�ItCr----- FREEWAY 40 TRACT Nt 3576 S ; •' ct z BERKELEY ESTATES UN. Nt2>. - e O 28 pC.NET • • d Sc LGATROS, DR ,LC z 1 T ACT NS 3LD6 NON STEAD C01:ST L.. -- ��� �B ••t:Y—31VAANNnS-tOOlVkITS A1NA VZNV• 3G -• DE— ANZA E SK BLV D. 326 - • - __. , _s = .t Iva.• _ ' _, I .I t•I.I11 t : 1. 1 :-1. : S! —� -•T 1 i 111. 3>•. t 30a.ii xltK 40 Is j •-TC7f -- • 7I L ''CCJ j =V SJ Z I s s NI i =-r ,.,,... , .. I! ��. �' Prissl t Lz3 :,, ook 3zG AC.RET 8 �'---.----- rA --- I I^, � r: �T •ram :,/c; rub • p r, �'.-�l !!.N a t' 1 t _1- y1='p -' .. -_•a- 10G.?7 /� p a . I . L'--_ It - --a 1Y �y i' Pctr.�t.- 1 O 18� •@ C4 I :-_�- � �I'; ..1,�'ai4r.w.�l�NitlI7N��- a�.1T1 1�`--8--: _ --'ilTw --L .� a = • � ' is r„' r'�,�� ��..:�:i:,� €€ - � - (w ; - n t : o id a~ t 1 1,. o„ ,.w rA: f� tj 'r>>� 62 1.]y AC. IIET• t� a I I I Fill -+r = 3 :o T. cy u '� ` .r •" ' S ey 5 , 1 �, .14 a +t•t ucvo . 1 : --- •i I 1{r-a- ��_; g� o -.w-, I �� : rw -- A" �. & - PC--} ' 2...0 � 1 E i tiT LOT I / 1�", '• S iS 3C:i c!\ \o I r t a PI �E °� i•_h I ,� -"r- _U_ fl]l Y „ a^ I'a;aia;al;at�a t•II It a ' �1 > iR 3 ' °--�, S'�II '•'•N'I..!I � k ti ,°�-yyYl � 1�__- a_` S' ... �; � •- °„ J a � 1 mN 9.3G9 AC. w t 1�%�r_; c CA I i) 1 I3�71COYYON L:1tj�'1 Ys`.� L.t'7f0 Ftl! .1ty__y A A C A �•• Q.P 'C i°I u w =� hyfcfQ E_J6!a9j�u pW DRIVE---`� +a__� ily. 9s•a�>.a Dl6,yLTiTs+Qjy / .. a k�wu11:.13•c. 44�"•-:� ,}g Le �-� 7ugL -1 �6]S �•- a� C6Zt_ a �=r 9 in^ dux_? F yy .1 e es tr r �r / + L % �, ''' •;� 1• 11 71 I . ,L - 1 9 i 4 r VLSL M •�,R'S ba aT Or, ((J of 1 L.6i_-3..a:0o G,w e! aDL�y "-1:.-e6 'ram . + •' Jtla. _ o G - t_----y.----Jz. Sr r-J I 3/ 1 -- ,i- L•1t1I_J I't! 1 71 M•. y� 61 / 7A •�tll jKf+1 1r 1 ter- , 1 �� n - ♦_ r• ( u T Li ao Il o S it zc I ' ----fit i+ . zf + f• a �� •�'J•i_ 36_u `r/.tr� si7 »3{ a�Z____7 d �I �I +! f. -- {' —_•. �y�--d gitaz_a j _ y er' 631 72U a%A g a + •'+• '� ': . -''•' .. LF i'•1' _ _ 3Z _ _ •I r F4, a .rya i 36 Gffi JtTi p� _ a----+ Y�Li d 10 1 f )!jy _ 86 70� 3 Clio 9! 1 7q_ j�1 ~n -tl L s ii6E .� ?O ll C b 1 _-/ 2€ SzJJ-ii3 F'�] L % 1- .&A _ Ltl 9/9 a >' -TIrn .Tr-,nfr-�c 1� y _ 23, AC NET it I- \ 1,T•-""i.. � w=•Iz,l-•.a�cw L 1 yy O ip N T'iq�If��Yr 1L J �•� �Al� 9 ' 9 TRACT Ns 3576 2 C/� i �a O t RCRKCLCY CSTA7 E5 UN. Nt'.} 1.28 AC.NES C3 ' ... t It GATH055 � R' / , �y S s �il 1\ T CT kt !.COU 1- OE- ANZA SLV 1U r..--.z1rnAnnns •rDDAfrrs Alm,o VZNV• 34 —'—� ,�o^ ,ie � 64 ACNr . t rll ..i.: e. d / {• Il f cj a }ua !y uc y ; N_ 3 9 Q PCLB L . ^ m1 —,�+ ��r ,1 �+ •PCL.1 A' L23 ACUET 7 1 y 1 rc �.. 9s f �i� v lz,+a __u _ .. IyS r�-•rr.r;�, I �'i a ,1• 1 IIC.i1 ,! 1 JI O N • : a 111 i ? r r•' ! �� �+ P7 l : G;-'_ ��%1 y � li .. °_ : � . , is:ri .� • !P� C1 M a_i• I`, y1ef.9.�slaifl aH;- ? T If n _YtT: --9 ,N r� I �-�-. �.1 'ii iii✓�•w' •' .�L:Lw a � � • I IY{f Swl z ••7 • .`I Ilk 'Id - `-—,tnIVN31 iSt 1 62 t�••n •: \ __I 15 _. :,T'(pi7 r-{L+�;, Ilia _-_ t �' PCLA u I• tl N 1^Y_./.1�11 7.'I i�.e+.i •- • G--n--'h71e'"r a S.Is �T _ 0.1 _ � N i^ a-'yr^�1 I ice,• :� � C ' +_yll '•�__� '.✓ \ i f• • __ • Ij`I• � i l •' J it�i• �'"' I 4--�-- ki 3 ..I 1 �' • "� LJ First Owner Name Situs Address ------------------ AL.MELEH, CRAIG J BENNETT,ALEXANDE BUSH,RICHARD C CASTILLO,JULIO & CHENG,LINDA CHEUNG,GREGORY&SO DE LANEY,CLARA M DE MOL,DIRK FRANCO,JOSEPH P & FUNG,POON GUTWIRTH,CARLOTA L HAMMONS,MARCIA J HAYES,M L HITZL,LORENA HOFF, J M HWA,CHARLES C & KA JOHNSON,NORMAN S & KRODEL PARTNERSHIP CKMEYER,KIRBY&P SON,CLARENCE LEE,JAMES K & SUSA LEE,SUNG H & MI K LEWIS,FLOYD V & AI LOFT,SOREN S LOW, JOAN L & EDMUN MALLEY,JAMES M & M MARTUCCI,CATHERINE MENDAL,GEOFFREY 0 MERTOL,ATILA & NIL MINAMI,KEIKO MITCHELL,JAMES A & MRB INVESTMENTS I NGUYEN,HIEU T ET A PAYNE, ROBERT A & K 6NCO ASSN 4G,DAVID&YING PORTOFINO DEVELOPM PORTOFINO DEVELOPM PORTOFINO DEVELOPM PORTOFINO DEVELOPM PORTOFINO DEVELOPM PORTOFINO DEVELOPM PORTOFINO DEVELOPM PORTOFINO DEVELOPM PORTOFINO DEVELOPM PORTOFINO DEVELOPM PORTOFINO DEVELOPM PORTOFINO DEVELOPM PORTOFINO DEVELOPM REICHENBERGER,DAVI SLATEN,LYNORE E SRINIVASAN,KRISHNA STOJA,PHYLLIS H THOMAS,DAVID D & P 20556 Copyright P & 143 LOCKSUNART WAY*S & 20542 SHADY OAK LN*C 11113 FIRETHORNE DR* C 11034 HOLLY TREE LN* 11103 FIRETHORNE DR* VOLANTE*LOS ALTOS CA 20550 SHADY OAK LN*C 11051 FIRETHORNE DR* 21230 HOMESTEAD RD*C VOLANTE*LOS ALTOS CA 20507 CEDARBROOK TER 20582 SHADY OAK LN*C 20517 CEDARBROOK TER 20509 CEDARBROOK TER 11073 FIRETHORNE DR* 20527 CEDARBROOK TER 155 LOCKSUNART WAY*S 11044 HOLLY TREE LN* 144 KIRBYHILL WAY*SU 20558 CEDARBROOK TER 163 LOCKSUNART WAY*$ 11053 FIRETHORNE DR* 154 KIRBYHILL WAY*SU 11026 HOLLY TREE LN* 20570 SHADY OAK LN*C 11083 FIRETHORNE DR* 139 LOCKSUNART WAY*S 20580 SHADY OAK LN*C 11024 HOLLY TREE LN* 11061 FIRETHORNE DR* 11093 FIRETHORNE DR* 175 E HOMESTEAD RD*S 149 LOCKSUNART WAY*S 11112 FIRETHORNE DR* 170 LOCKSUNART WAY*S VOLANTE*LOS ALTOS CA VOLANTE*LOS ALTOS CA VOLANTE*LOS ALTOS CA VOLANTE*LOS ALTOS CA VOLANTE*LOS ALTOS CA VOLANTE*LOS ALTOS CA VOLANTE*LOS ALTOS CA VOLANTE*LCS ALTOS CA VOLANTE*LOS ALTOS CA NAPOLI*LOS ALTOS CA NAPOLI*LOS ALTOS CA NAPOLI*LOS ALTOS CA NAPOLI*LOS ALTOS CA • Page 1 Phone Parcel Num Ref Num 309-42-029 323-44-044 323-45-054 323-44-022 323-45-055 316-01-034 323-44-043 323-44-011 326-10-062 316-01-032 323-45-006 323-44-038 323-45-008 323-45-007 323-45-058 323-45-010 309-42-027 323-44-024 309-42-001 323-45-052 309-42-026 323-44-010 309-42-003 323-44-021 323-44-041 323-45-057 309-42-030 323-44-039 323-44-020 323-44-009 323-45-056 309-42-036 309-42-028 323-45-005 309-42-033 316-01-033 316-01-025 316-01-026 316-01-027 316-01-028 316-01-029 316-01-030 316-01-031 316-01-035 316-01-057 316-01-058 316-01-059 316-01-060 NAPOLI*LOS ALTOS CA 316-01-061 20572 SHADY OAK LN*C (408)245-8118 323-44-040 20552 SHADY OAK LN*C 323-44-042 11102 FIRETHORNE DR* 323-45-004 150 KIRBYHILL WAY*SU 309-42-002 CEDARBROOK TER (408)720-9819 323-45-053 (c) 1993 Dataquick Information Network (408)749-9283 (408)245-4735 (415)323-2371 (408)720-1882 (408)720 -8837 (408)245-3234 (408)730-8587 (408)739-8820 (916)782-7843 (408)720-0586 (408)736-5362 (408)735-1818 (408)732-9551 (408)738 -2569 (408)738-2006 (408)996-8728 (408)245-9790 (408)720-0373 (408)773-1854 42 53 33 54 20 41 29 59 18 45 36 47 46 57 49 5 35 1 51 4 28 3 32 39 56 8 37 31 27 55 10 6 44 9 19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21 22 23 24 25 26 38 40 43 2 52 Page 2 First Owner Name Situs Address Phone Parcel Num Ref Mum ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VIDAL,SHEILA M 20519 CEDARBROOK TER 323-45-009 48 VIDOVICH,JOHN T ET 10931 N DE ANZA BLVD 326-10-061 58 VISTICA,SUZANNE M 20537 CEDARBROOK TER 323-45-011 50 WELTE,TRUST 11036 HOLLY TREE LN* 323-44-023 34 WHITBY,WALTER T TR 11016 HOLLY TREE LN* (408)737-7292 323-44-019 30 • • i Copyright (c) 1993 Dataquick Information Network First Owner Name Situs Address BAILEY,JOE C TRUST 20531 SHADY OAK LN*C BONELLI,STEPHEN J 11050 FIRETHORNE DR* CLAY,WILLIAM T & R 20530 SHADY OAK LN*C CONNOR,LOUIS 11072 FIRETHORNE DR* CORNELL,LOIS E 11060 FIRETHORNE DR* CUPERTINO DE ORO C 20441 E HOMESTEAD RD CUPERTINO DE ORO C 11010 SARATOGA-SUNNY ELLIMAN,ROBERT R & 11052 FIRETHORNE DR* GALLO,RONALD 11030 FIRETHORNE DR* HWANG,YUN-SHENG & 20532 SHADY OAK LN*C LEAVELL,MICHAEL VOLANTE*LOS ALTOS CA MANGOLD,GILDA C ET 20540 SHADY OAK LN*C MARIANI GROUP COMP DE ANZA BLVD*CUPERTI MARSHALL,LILLIAN L 11043 FIRETHORNE DR* MCNICOL,PAUL B TRU 11040 FIRETHORNE DR* OLOUMI,JALIL 11092 FIRETHORNE DR* OYAMA,WRIGHT ET AL 10991 N DE ANZA BLVD PENCO ASSN 160 LOCKSUNART WAY*S NG,CHIH-LEN C 11082 FIRETHORNE DR* NNEY,MARLENE 11042 FIRETHORNE DR* PORTOFINO DEVELOPM VOLANTE*LOS ALTOS CA PORTOFINO DEVELOPM VOLANTE*LOS ALTOS CA PORTOFINO DEVELOPM VOLANTE*LOS ALTOS CA PORTOFINO DEVELOPM VOLANTE*LOS ALTOS CA PORTOFINO DEVELOPM VOLANTE*LOS ALTOS CA PORTOFINO DEVELOPM VOLANTE*LOS ALTOS CA PORTOFINO DEVELOPM VOLANTE*LOS ALTOS CA SHALLENBERGER,FRAN 20533 SHADY OAK LN*C SHAW,KATHLEEN K 11041 FIRETHORNE DR* STROM & ASSOCIATES 120 LOCKSUNART WAY*S SVILICH,RUTH TRUST 11025 SARATOGA-SUNNY VASILIADES,MICHAEL 11062 FIRETHORNE DR* YAP,FUNG Y 11032 FIRETHORNE DR* • Page 1 Phone Parcel Num Ref Num ------------------------------------ 323-44-014 25 (408)720-1762 323-44-005 19 323-44-047 29 323-45-001 30 (408)736-0694 323-44-007 21 309-42-039 3 309-42-040 4 323-44-006 20 323-44-001 15 323-44-046 28 316-01-054 10 (408)738-8841 323-44-045 27 316-01-122 13 (408)739-9695 323-44-012 23 323-44-003 17 323-45-003 32 326-10-059 33 309-42-032 2 323-45-002 31 323-44-004 18 316-01-025 5 316-01-026 6 316-01-027 7 316-01-028 8 316-01-029 9 316-01-055 11 316-01-056 12 (408)737-1296 323-44-015 26 323-44-013 24 309-42-031 1 323-36-018 14 323-44-008 22 (408)733-3804 323-44-002 16 Copyright (c) 1993 Dataquick Information Network Assessors Parcel Number PROPERTY ADDRESS Book Pape Parcel OWNER ADDRESS IF NOT OWNER OCCUPIED 309 42 031 120LOCKSUNART WAY SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 309 42 032 160LOCKSUNART WAY SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 309 42 039 20441 E. HOMESTEAD RD. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 309 42 040 11010 SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE RD. SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 323 36 018 11025 SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE RD. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 003 11040 FIRETHORNE DR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 004 11042 FIRETHORNE DR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 013 11041 FIRETHORNE DR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 44 015 20533 SHADY OAK LANE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 45 001 11072 FIRETHORNE DR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 45 002 11082 FIRETHORNE DR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 326 10 059 10991 N. DE ANZA BLVD. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 309 42 026 163 LOCKSUNART WAY SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 309 42 027 155 LOCKSUNART WAY SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 309 42 029 143 LOCKSUNART WAY SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 309 42 030 139 LOCKSUNART WAY SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 309 42 033 170 LOCKSUNART WAY SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 309 42 036 175 E. HOMESTEAD RD. SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 323 j 44 024 11044 HOLLY TREE LN. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 0 • Page 2 Z Mailing List �/ Job #9837.00 Assessors Parcel Number PROPERTY ADDRESS Stook Page Parcel OWNER ADDRESS IF NOT OWNER OCCUPIED 323 44 043 20550 SHADY OAK LANE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 323 45 064 11113 FIRETHORNE DR. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 328 10 061 10931 DE ANZA BLVD. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 326 1 10 062 21230 HOMESTEAD RD. CUPERTINO, CA 95014 V'4/P1AN7-00%L"EL2l5T 1 certify that this Is a true accurate list of property owners of parcels within 300 ft. of site perimeter. An incorrect mailing list and/or APN map/envelopes may invalidate the decision of the Planning Commission or City Council and result In the need to refile the application and payment of fee. Ow pp i le Company SANTA CLARA COUNTY TANNING DEPARTMEN ENTAL ENVLANDr�DEVELOPMENT HREPORT CES OCT () J 1990 TO: C � �,tr 6,0 Date 0rk ��tZ) Owner/Applicant 11ammn 6,pmm%Er File No: Location ��0�� pp,PaA7_ 91A/(4 4--__1 The application is not approved for the following reason(s): ® The application is approved subject to the following conditions: _2"-A sanitary sewer connection will be required. No sewers are available, therefore, in order to determine the amount of drainfield required for a septic tank system, percolation tests will be necessary. Individual sewage disposal requirements have been determined for this site. A septic tank permit will be issued for construction of a system which must then be built in conformance with Bulletin "A" or local ordinance. lineal feet of subsurface leaching line with room for 100% expansion and a gallon capacity tank will be required. Existing septic tank(s) must be pumped and backfilled in accordance with Environmental Health standards. A bond in the amount of $ should be posted with to ensure completion of work. Contact the district Sanitarian for final inspection upon completion. Domestic water shall be supplied by an approved water system or by individual well(s) installed to Environmental Realth standards. V/ Domestic water shall be supplied by l:Qa Lion,, �P�Jct_Q Seal well in accordance with county standards. A bond in the amount of $ should be posted with to ensure completion of work. Provide water agreement for existing well. Submit revised plot plan to scale (1" = 201) showing house, driveway, appurtenant structures and required drainfield to contour. Leach lines must be at least 50 feet from any swale or from any cut bank over 3 feet and must be at least 100 feet from any existing or proposed wells. 11� I Additional Comments ���n 1pj� ► Ut I [111A4 �7�CUA, S a A/ 1 — iLL 6 Eft [Qa%AAt#f6 11M,1, fT �3u) 1A61n[ mDvAi--t .«unarms Conditioned by: �,, aAAr\ C Approved by: R. T: i'L'6 District Sanitarian Supervising Sanitarian 2220 Moorpark Avenue San Jose, CA 95128 (403) 299-6J6o ©4217 REV 5/66 CUPERTINO SANITARY DISTRICT SANTA CLARA COUNTY DISTRICT MANAGER•ENOINEER E0065 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD, SLOG C BOARD OF DIRECTORS MARK THOMAS A CO. INC. CUPERTINO. CA 95014 CURns B. HARRISON. n�A DISTRICT COUNSEL .40A1 3559071 OR, JOSEPH F. BROWN Mn. RICHARD A FELLOWS PHILI► D. ASSAF OF M RUSNTON STUB OIS. N[S 9. SRUNf [LL A �IL, �1I]y'�tSG. �IM NDELLH KERR JR. SPE RRY I. Y7ELLL1 ■li OCT 0 2 1990 October 1, 1990 File: CuSD - MOP Planning Department (Cupertino) Department of Planning and Development City of Cupertino P.O. Box 580 Cupertino, CA 95015 Re: Application Nos. 17-U-90 and 25-EA-90, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 11010 N. De Anza Blvd., Cupertino (APN 309-42-037) Gentlemen: The existing building is connected to the Cupertino Sanitary District sanitary sewerage system. Due to the addition and change of use, it is anticipated that payment of Additional Commercial Density Fees shall be required in accordance with Chapter VIII, Section 8203 of • the District operations Code. Yours very truly, WEMC:lw MARK THOMAS & CO. INC. District Manager -Engineer 04 by William E. McBee SUPPLYING SANITARY SEWERAGE SERVICES FOR: CITY OF CUPERTINO. PORTIONS OF THE CITIES OF SARATOGA. SUNNYVALE AND LOS ALTOS AND SURROUNDING UNINCORPORATED AREAS October 3, 1990 Mr. Robert Cowan Director of Community Development City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Sontca CloraVoley Water District 5750 ALMADEN EXPRESSWAY SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95118 TELEPHONE (408) 265.2600 FACSIMILE (408) 266.0271 AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER L.y 9 f✓ .sL4'lAlir;;.e OUT 09 1990 Subject: Use Permit Application to reconstruct a Chevron Station, Pile 17-U-90 and 25-EA-90 sent to us on September 24, 1990 The site would not be subject to flooding from a District facility in the event of a 1% flood. Proposed land use change would not directly affect any District facility. If site drainage is to be directed into a District facility, detailed plans should be sent for our review and issuance of a permit prior to start of construction. In accordance with District Ordinance 90-1, the owner should show any existing well(s) on the plans. The well(s) should be properly registered with the District and either maintained or abandoned in accordance with S District standards. Property owners or their representative should call Mr. David Zozaya at (408) 927-0710, for information regarding well permits and the registering of or abandonment of any wells. �AIA-� � Eugetfts H. Sullivan Supervisor, Permits Section Design Coordination Division cc: Public Works Department City of Cupertino Chevmn � Chevron USA. Inc. San Ramon, CA August 6, 1990 Service Station #9-5700 Homestead and DeAnza Cupertino. CA Mr. Mark Caughey, Senior Planner City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Dear Mark: Enclosed is a colored Site Plan. At this site, we have no groundwater monitoring wells. Chevron does have a well into the upper soil layer. I have enclosed two of the latest reports of this well. If you have any questions about the well, please call Walt Posluszny of Chevron USA at (415) 842-9040. I can be reached at (415) 842-8824. Sincerely, ;;--1411 ��-Ik— Karen Dennison Project Engineer ND: dim Enclosures cc: R. D. Wahlen CHEVRON USA 5700 DATE WELL ---------------- 19-Jan-90 V1 CUPERTINO - 11010 N DE ANZA BLVD/HOMESTEAD JOB 5202 DTH DTW HT BAILED PPM LEL FVCL DTB EMP C.ELEV ------------------------------------- - - ------------- D/W 275 SM 02/ 01i 90 PAGE Wgeliler - ryan inc. (415)783-7500 general and eadroemealal conlraclou _ c8GvBom USA sroV CVPEBIlNO - 11010 X DE AD3A BLYD/VOMEGJ8«D JOB 5203 DATE VELL DTII DT'd HT BA[LED PIPM QEL FVCL DTB EMP c.�� —'--------------------------------'-------------------------------- J9-Fao-;o Y1 D/v 275 zL CUPERTINO SANITARY DISTRICT SANTA CLARA COUNTY DISTRICT MANAGER•ENGINCCR 20065 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD. BLDG.0 BOARD OF DIRECTORS E TNONAS CO. INC. CUPERTINO. CA 95014.2396 ROY M. RUSNTONw MAR PHONE 14001 293.7071 R FAX 14OM 233.3173 WENOELL H. RERR. JR rc'n DIf TRICT COUNBCL CURTIS I NARRIBON DR JOSEPH F. BROWN PHILIP D. ASSAF OF RICHARD A. FELLOWS STURGIS. NESS. ORUNSELL l SPERRY September 7, 1993 File: CuSD -MOP Planning Department (Cupertino) Michele I3jurman Community Development Department City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Ave Cupertino, CA 95014-3202 Re: Application No. 17-U-90, • (Modified) Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 11010 De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino (APN 309-42-037) Dear Ms. Bjurman: The existing building is connected to the Cupertino Sanitary District's sanitary sewerage system. Prior to issuance of any building permits by the City, plans will have to be reviewed by the District and the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Plant. Due to the change in use, payment of Additional Commercial Density Fees shall be required. Yours very truly, MARK THOMAS & CO. INC. District Manager -Engineer by Carl H. Beckham CHB:Iw Eric: Cupertino Sanitary District Letters, dated August 9, 1990 & October 1, 1990 cc: Robert H. Lee & Associates, Inc. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. SUPPLYING SANITARY SEWERAGE SERVICES FOR: CITY OF CUPERTINO. PORTIONS 01 THE CITIES OF SARATOGA. SUNNYVALE AND LOS ALTOS AND SURROUNDING UNINCORPORATED AREAS CI PERTINO SANITARY DISTRICT 20065 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. BUILDING C CUPERTINO, CALIF. 95014 August 9, 1990 File: CuSD - MOP Planning Department (Cupertino) Department of Planning and Development City of Cupertino P.O. Box 580 • Cupertino, CA 95015 • Re: Application Nos. 17-U-90 and 25-EA-90, Karen Dennison, Chevron Station, 11010 No. De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino (APN 309-42-037) Gentlemen: The existing building is connected to the Cupertino Sanitary District sanitary sewerage system. Due to the change in use, payment of Additional Commercial Density Fees shall be required in accordance with Chapter VIII, Section 8203(b) of the District Operations code. Yours very truly, MARK THOMAS & CO. INC. District Manager -Engineer by William E. McBee WEMc:lw UUPERTINO SANITARY Disi'R rJl 20055 STEVENS CREEK ULVU. BUILUING C CUPERTINO, CALIF. 95014 Department of Planning and Development City of Cupertino P.O. Box 580 Cupertino, CA 95015 October 1, 1990 File: CuSD - MOP Planning Department (Cupertino) Re: Application Nos. 17-U-90 and 25-EA-90, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 11010 N. De Anza Blvd., Cupertino (APN 309-42-037) Gentlemen: The existing building is connected to the Cupertino Sanitary District sanitary sewerage system. Due to the addition and change of use, it is anticipated that payment of Additional Commercial Density Fees shall be required in accordance with Chapter VIII, Section 8203 of the District Operations Code. • Yours very truly, MARK THOMAS & CO. INC. District Manager -Engineer by William E. McBee WEMc:lw 9n193 City of Cupertino Building Division 11010 De Anza Chevron remodel • At the time of application for the building permit be sure to address the following areas of concern. 1. Provide a soils report that is current. 2. Provide complete details showing attachments, gauges, construction, calculations, etc. 3. Provide documentation that all equipment is labeled and listed by a nationally recognized testing agency. 4. Submit approval from other agencies such as Health Dept., SCWD- ground water protection, EPA., etc. 5. For rated walls such as at the North end of the property, note the approved assembly you are using. • 6. Provide building data such as the type, construction, sprinklers, etc. CUP, Q� *j x o iR r. 7�,.0 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino CA 95014 (4081 252-4505 September 8, 1993 PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS 11010 De Anza Blvd. -Robert H. Lee & Associates 17-U-90 1. Street improvements are required: (ie. bus stop turn -out, Saratoga -Sunnyvale Rd widening, handicap ramp, etc.). 2. Underground existing overhead service lines (ie. electrical, telephone, etc.) • 3. Fees & bonds are required for plan review, inspection and construction. 4. Thorough review is required upon submittal of plans at Public Works. CUPERTINO SANITARY DISTRICT SANTA CLARA COUNTY DISTRICT MANAGER' E NOI NEE" 2CO63 SMENS CREEK BOULEVARD. BLOC. C BOARD Of DIRECTORS CUrERTINO. CA 9301 A-2396 ROY M. RUSMTON. -A MARK THOMAS III CO INC. WE DELL H. KERR JR_Aam PNON[IA001233.7071 FAX I4001233•3173 CURTIS B. HARRISON DISTRICT COUNSEL DR. JOSEPH F. BROWN ►HILIP D. ASSAF OF RICHARDA. FELLOWS STURGIS. NES3. BRUNSELL • SPERRY September 7, 1993 File: CuSD - MOP Planning Department (Cupertino) Michele Bjurman Community Development Department City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Ave Cupertino, CA 95014-3202 Re: Application No. 17-U-90, • (Modified) Chevron U.S.A. Inc. 11010 De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino (APN 30942-037) Dear Ms. Bjurman: The existing building is connected to the Cupertino Sanitary District's sanitary sewerage system. Prior to issuance of any building permits by the City, plans will have to be reviewed by the District and the San Jose/Santa Clara Water Pollution Plant. Due to the change in use, payment of Additional Commercial Density Fees shall be required. Yours very truly, MARK THOMAS & CO. INC. District Manager -Engineer by Carl H. Beckham CHB:lw Enc: Cupertino Sanitary District Letters, dated August 9, 1990 & October 1, 1990 cc: Robert H. Lee & Associates, Inc. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. SUPPLYING SANITARY SEWERAGE SERVICES FOR: CITY OF CUPERTINO. PORTIONS OF THE CITIES OF SARATOGA. SUNNYVALE AND LOS ALTOS AND SURROUNDING UNINCORPORATED AREAS City of Cupertino 10300 ' To: Fran: Subject: 0 CH4 of Cupertino Torre Aveaw Cupertino, California ?95014 408) 232-4505 V ato: �!C!\ AV& O c //�U PUBLIC WORKS SANTA CLARA COUNTY SEP 16 1993 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LAND DEVELOPMENT REPORT TO: C i ty o f C u p e r t i n o Date: September 9, 1993 Owner/Applicant: Robert H Lee Associates File N: 17-U-90 Location: 11010 De Anza Blvd The application is approved subject to the following condition(s): A sanitary sewer connection will be required. No sewers are available, therefore, in order to determine the amount of drainfield required for a septic tank system, percolation tests will be necessary. Individual sewage disposal requirements have been determined for this site. A septic tank permit will be issued for construction of a system which must then be built in conformance with Bulletin "A". lineal feet of subsurface leaching line plus lineal feet of subsurface equally split between a positive acting diversion valve. A 1500 gallon capacity septic tank is required. The existing septic tank(s) must be pumped and backfilled in accordance with Department of Environmental Health standards or local ordinances. Contact the district environmental health specialist for final inspection upon completion. Domestic water shall be supplied by an approved water system or individual well(s) installed to Department of Environmental Health standards. Domestic water shall be supplied by San Jose Water Company. Seal all wells in accordance with SCVWD standards. Submit revised plot plan to scale (1"=20') showing all structures, driveway, and required drainfield on contours. Leach lines must be at least 50 feet from any Swale and must be at least 100 feet from any existing or proposed wells, including those on neighboring properties. Setback from cut banks equal four times the height of the cut. No leach lines are allowed on slopes exceeding 50 percent. XXXXXX The Department of Environmental Health has no objection to this application as submitted. XXXXXX Construction plans must be submitted to this department for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. The applicant should contact Program Services at (408) 299-6060 for further details. XXXXXX Additional comments:Bemoval of existing underground storage tank may require a permit from Hazardous Material Compliance Contact 299-6930 for details Conditioned by: Can Thai Approved by:Richard Fuchs I� r- District Specialist Supervising Environmental Health Specialist CUPERTINO SANITARY DISTRICT 20065 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. BUILDING C CUPERTINO, CALIF. 95014 August 9, 1990 File: CuSD - MOP Planning Department (Cupertino) Department of Planning and Development City of Cupertino P.O. Box 580 Cupertino, CA 95015 Re: Application Nos. 17-U-90 and 25-EA-90, Karen Dennison, Chevron Station, 11010 No. De Anza Boulevard, Cupertino (APN 309-42-037) Gentlemen: The existing building is connected to the Cupertino Sanitary District sanitary sewerage system. Due to the change in use, payment of Additional Commercial Density Fees shall be required in accordance with Chapter VIII, Section 8203(b) of the District Operations Code. Yours very truly, MARK THOMAS & CO. INC. District Manager -Engineer by William E. McBee WEMc:lw GVERTINO SANITARY DISTRIC I 20055 STEVENS CREEK KLVU. BUILUING C CUPERTINO, CALIF. 95014 Department of Planning and Development City of Cupertino P.O. Box 580 Cupertino, CA 95015 Gentlemen: October 1, 1990 File: CuSD - MOP Planning Department (Cupertino) Re: Application Nos. 17-U-90 and 25-EA-90, Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 11010 N. De Anza Blvd., Cupertino (APN 309-42-037) The existing building is connected to the Cupertino Sanitary District sanitary sewerage system. Due to the addition and change of use, it is anticipated that payment of Additional Commercial Density Fees shall be required in accordance with Chapter VIII, Section 8203 of the District Operations Code. • Yours very truly, MARK THOMAS & CO. INC. District Manager -Engineer by William E. McBee WEMC : lw h %N"1'A CLARA COUNTY CENTRAL FIRE, PROTECTION 1)ISTRICY r F.e Ii71Ml WIN('IIIi5T1.R OLVI). I PS IiA I0S. CA 95030-18I8 4 HIl%) 37%_4010 SIR%Il'li n,M NINI'li 1917 ,FAX (10%)37%-9342 PROJECT CLEARANCE 11010 De Anra BI 17-U-90 (Location) (File Number) is Robert H. Lee and Associates (Applicant) The applicant has met all the conditions of the Central Fire Protection District concerning; the subject file and there is no objection to: Proposed Use Permit 2. Proposed Extension of Time 3. Proposed Construction for Storage A clearance letter from the Hazardous Materials Division of Central Fire • is re uired rsuance of any building permit Tue Sep 7.1993 uthorized by) (Date) Thomas L. Von Joo-Tornell Deputy Fire Marshal III Land Development and Engineering FORWARD TO: City of Cupertino Planning_and Development Suring W v Pnllry Chin ,.f- 6-1,hrll, Ci lµMrww, Marv" Srrrno. Snn,lugn. Torn , f 1 ,., Calus wi�l Adje, W Cuun,r A—,, Ineeueemeee�e ��pypy����yygryqryM■AA `!l1111L1�� a 1 iyi i• IS at � a a i �i n All m �i tea! t{�ilt �� ������� � ge fO■:7 T tr.:^rss:3r-saszn-rers-.t- • css t tr r. vrs mayzeussem+r. 11 �racr.-rn.-zrar - � sr. r.. s�e+r-�-mrna. .. .. ar. r.•r.-r:s.•?: n r • 1� '20 . | § � \ I 11 LLEU � _ � � % 1 _ < \ . I | § bk �� | |, d2I I U{! .• � � _ ■ � � }) / (D lmpq M s�Pm 1 I 1 1 M waro� i wo inn, W V.1M MaYC1.W I �16 t lT� pl W.fOMr nao r�u—r l �Iy M (q afl A Ku�M�—yam ---------------------------------------- .w. v _c g1i1Q A t KGa.a SAfiATQQA—SUWMALE ROAD M AWA eiw. QI al(A � � Y/uIOVVV VCMK YM —� wwo •cu —�U r.t Ao.rt O wdKn� faw ro R K10� of N.. eKaluxr •ter aVM ���� � V� —L VrV ��M1 Jam. -J•L JA.Ia 1�. F Vrr�rr J�LN 1�.� Leo" M............. .�v m. .............cma�¢ M..............n.rx O..............cac.. A our O..............cm.. A K ccwm �..........c ftm ncvm� a n.i C i�Ill A1A.u-q SM PLAN >MQLPWIMA C& v� ..•Y • ���ytY ��2 4 E �a �s C y y99it a 1 l fir a a 7f k 4771 lam_ I � $ � ,p ! ,g a i 4 19 i eE 15 ,1 'I'll I I Ik fil- ]L f Q t L � 7 7 J L t I O l ■ p 0 • l 711 b MrIPBfOtYI clot.. errr 4. , rpo ,tw.[ara _[yam _tlL R ------------------------------------'---'� iDnwna au.rc as am W � R[m�ucxo BARATOQA-WM WALE ROAD DE ANZA BLVD. —si M W Rug. cr) ,4i0a.a x �M YIp.Wl1 LLIIW�IO n IDOD n wnaa+.a D R R1P0 • Duna+ .ol[w�[uu.t�tw 11Wi.T oaY41[ WL :wz r R... s.....rMw ar Loom (..............+ntx O..............tm.o ro Rrr ■............. .�ca ❑............. .tm+.ro R Kn �..........n,[r non ntv.nw AlA[ I�DW'N Cc Ir- -kl. W.M 1392r, SWAd ag Food kW4vrd'*' LCHT - — ----- "LAW OW 60" wr N 00 SRXW IEKRM .. ....... 90 10 10 (Loalo L*qT 014� MY FFK)Nr ELEVATION A ILIS SUJW,V-WAM iieisin O _rm won UMM ZLIII= tLSIDOCdI r-ri EMN (i> r LJ Le ANA < < Won a ow FAk rm" cm lo lK 'Drow. pr '114 1.acw lumac CMo" wAID4 SDE B-EVATK)N B IKL mwnrD w w/ w— pose &" To WCH w4u SILK (L-0) Co pawmimkin" h �� N.-I ih a a` { O • 1 S. A M111'Y(Otrrl fY1.1 �11 Ou.VY 0 40 R } 8 C I D E i F i -- - 10 Cr olmn rca+ m, _� SITE PLAN +la" I.r011Alm 1 •aaa [K S ,, . ®',` -•�• } jai �a 1 's IS le C al aw .nn - II:1 cwo .m,+ �: . a Ir,�, 4 ,•c,trt . . OiOF•OI+ pa1R LN .. &ND of CACH J sPANNCrc (6 P010Es) +la, ar.ar /0 .:. 4_ s...c - ----------- co L t SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE ROAD "GAR WASH AT E)CIT SIDE oA1Ll'; Lde INTEN-D TD DELETE "CAA WAStf S14N 6Ri41WALI-Y PRO- „ +• PoSraD AT F_tjrRANcE SME,r-lo•-o• - 5fAE or chRWAsrI- SIGN AREA TABLE - SS# 9-5700; CUPERTINO ITEM UNIT ITEM ALLOWABLE NO. DESCRIPTION DIMENSION, FT. 60. Fr. CITY SO. Fr. SO. FT. 1. Ground Sign - Logo 4.16 x 4.67 19.4 1 1,9 4 2. Ground Sign - Price 4.16 x 4.67 19A 1 19.4 3. Ground Sign - Food MwVCar Wash 8.46 x 0.81 6.8 1 6.8 SUBTOTAL A 45.4 50 • 4. Bldg. Sign - 'Chevron' Word 9.25 x 1.96 18.1 2 362 5. Bldg. Sign - Logo; Canopy 2.00 x 2.25 4.5 2 9.0 6. Bldg. Sign - Logo; Spanner 1.54 x 1.03 2.8 3 8.4 7. Bldg. Sign -'Food Marr 10.42 x 1,58 16.5 1 16.5 8. Bldg. Sign - 'Car Wash' 8.50 x 1.46 12.4 1 12.4 62.5 SUBTOTAL B 172 " 9. Exempt Sign -'Self' (Serve) 1.00 x .5 .5 6 3.0 10. Exempt Sign -'Exit ...' 9.00 x .67 6.0 1 6.0 11. Exempt Sign -'Entrance' 3.00 x .67 2.0 1 2.0 Based on 186' of street frontage. m Based on 155' of building frontage. t i S)c,N P«+IIJ GttGv2onJ SS` 9-5700 .De f!N ?_ Al H oMESrER_D 3-29-9} 0 • A I B I C I D I E I F I C I H I I K oulnu wu o { la°"rtiiu woa .� LIW+ a+cr ,n-awl r.acla u.� I 12 3 4 =� N•10-t ' If[ tTl win n1,IR - ^' _ "• "°'" "`'a'�-�P FLOOR PLAN ... I'''' �10-H• ��� I!.Mr'1" 1 1 4 ^"�`�`� •�+ M. °`� ELEVATION O w.AA nnlq ELEVATION C nicm ort.+.lrt FRONT ELEVATION SIDE ELEVATION - C�r i" r— TRASH ENCLOSURE TE-2 6 sctLEl v18• - 1 •-o- E 1 8 B B I �r..,a�a — I , �^ � B B B J tKET ELEVATION E CANOPY/MARKETER ELEVATIONS scN r.I 3"'. RAM ' } - J a BUILOIRO. CRIgR.. Ato 01SRER5FR ELEVAI,URS wno oai 09n_Ot v,r..._� Chevron U.S.A. Inc. SERVICE 5TA ITTFF10" 9-S100 a SARAIOCA-S—MALE MAD DE ARIA BLV0.1 aR0 , Ao R Ao R7 A s A — 0 I+AEO ra R.Ib xa m.tAr It0m�6Ot� a.0 915700 J L • • NOTE s CENTE2LIn1C of MASlirJ(L-r v.)A�(_ Tp f?C La GATED s0 TNAT fi2E ENLY O/1PP4./C/3/T�S LoT� .e. a,, /'2 -f?oM pft,aPE /LT le 'L _ Mf1 S a /n1 2 7' WA L L P2 C- L I M l nl �q 2 Y pi A N 3-Z9-9/ gPPRTOC-P-SIJNNYVAI_ • 2O-o —A • a - - I I_ _ �� __......... IT ...._....._ ... _._ • I L j •PIEti ,,,rO SC.R LE I I i O--- � r FA CE oaE PA nl Cat 6TA L L x 2-d L On(G (A 7- W E s r TEAI PANG-LS 8' TILL x /G' LON<,. i4Le- 0N2)l J(•JlrS ovIr M14SOlVAY Loi LW6 WALL CHEV2011 ss # 9-S760 : PehA/ZA/HOA16SF EA--D /\rol? rN F�A C E SCORED —� �� GOMrs=L r�CE SPLIT FAGS t 5r-0 .!E S L SPLIT FACE ,�o,t i N ��• C E VAC—ul .. 7. J. BEST -IS Tapered 5 Score Split Face Block Elegant modern design. Creates an illusion of smaller module units with the vertical score shadow. This versatile concrete masonry unit was created to provide the design profession with a block that is economical and has flexibility in scale and texture. Available in 8" widths with one or two sides scored and split, and in t 2" widths with one side scored and split. O ".7 CM, ,,w far the aefre,- � CHEM 9MCKK lNU =a64C ALVAFACC-NIIL =CAC �NICN CITY CALF=FIJA = _=-7 4.81 (415) 47,1. 11 11 Project: Chevron - Cupertino SS# 9-5700 Date: February 26, 1991 PLANT LIST TREES SyMbo Botanical Name Common Name Zzg CD Cedrus deodora Deodar Cedar 48" Box As Shown PB Prunus cerasifera Purple Leaf Plum 36" Box As Shown Trunus blireiana' • � �Paiatoersti- 6yB QA Quercus agrifolia Coast live Oak 36" Box As Shown SS Sequoia sempervirens Coast Redwood 36" Box As Shown i SHRUBS SyMbo Botanical Name Common Name Mze AH Alyogyne huegelii Blue Hibiscus 5 Gal. As Shown AD Arctostaphylos densiflora McMinn Manzanita 5 Gal. As Shown 7Ioward McMinn i CF Ceanothus 'Frosty Blue' Frosty Blue 5 Gal. As Shown California lilac ED Escallonia Newport Dwarf Dwarf Escallonia I Gal. 2'-6" o.c. EE Escallonia exoniensis Escallonia 5 Gal. 5'-0" o.c. Trades' HH Hemerocallis hybrid Daylily 1 Gal. As Shown (no yellow varieties) LS Leptospermum scoparium New Zealand Tea Tree 15 Gal. As Shown ND Nandina domestica Dwarf Heavenly Bamboo 1 Gal. T-6" o.c. TTarbour Dwarf GROUNDCOVER Syrnbo Botanical Name AU Arctostphylos uva-ursi Pt. Reyes' VL Viola labradorica VINES Symbol Botanical Nnme EF Euonymus fortunei radicans Common Name NU Bxadinz Bearberry 1 Gal. 18" o.c. Flats 8" O.C. -Common Name Common Winter Creeper 1 Gal. As Shown RED, WHITE AND BLUE BEDDING PLANT LIST ANNUALS LIST- SUN HEIGHT 6"- 12" WINTER SPRING SUMMER FALL Pansy Alyssum Alyssum Alyssum Primrose Ranunculus Lantana Chrysanthemum Viola Dianthus Ageratum Primrose Nemesia Celosia Ageratum Viola Dianthus Lobelia Forget Me Not Lobelia Phlox Salvia HEIGHT 18" - 24" Bachelor's Button Delphinium Snapdragons Asters Iceland Poppy Salvia Celosia Chysanthemum Snapgragon Snapdragon Bachelor's Button Linaria Lupine Dianthus Stock Stock Statice Nicotiana Petunia Phlox Salvia Zinnia NOTE: SELECT ONLY RED, WHITE OR BLUE VARIETIES FROM THE LIST ABOVE. n 1987, RYKO Manufacturing Company set out to explore new markets with the introduction of the Voyager automat vehicle wash system. The Voyager brought with it an unequalled level of performance, system dependability ar, technological advancement. The industrys response could only have been measured by its acceptanCe of tt revolutionary concept in vehicle cleaning, and the Voyager soon became the industrys preferred choice In quail vehicle cleaning. THE NEW GENERATION VOYAGER a: - . y., 55 5 • � YI(^, : ^n: -. :: 'a.'•- ` "::{r �'Y' . ,.•..,r •,.. J1'it.�l' x •t. S PSS VOYAGER FLEXIBILITY r'•r,..t. ,:1:. , M ,:• .. �5 nh •,�',1. .. f':, •. :r'. ,{ •r".1!, ,• .:.1':'f'S.AJr ,•x:'4". y• �; •,"5 ' i.. ' '4 .:5 ..5•': .. 'ti. ,'Ar'r''x'a 1•Mx 51', 'x 'fig l.{5: 5 . •• .,'!' ]{!• .', . .. S.M", ,'{n �,1••, ,n 71�'S A'::. •:. r .'r {:Y.fC :riFY'~rr�,,,4 fir,,• ..y% .. .•, • y A.. \." " '1f, • . ..:', "f''' j ►.: •Ik- . `, MR• K: Imn'.10n.2Li .,Y� , ,M":,".... J[a4'•''t,'.1�.1' :.{:uraa<,.�1. �paraitelea revenues at xlcations au across uie {.uunuy. &? WAGER STANDARD FEATURES 7te operational integrity of a car wash system can often be judged by the standard equipment it possesses. The Voyagefs sta whir controls serve as the control flub for all Voyager wash activities. The corrosive -resistant. all aluminum fratrit + lily RYKO. Thus frame is light enough to allow the Voyager to operate continuously with uninterrupted ease, yet ,S ; 4 ' trough to provide support to today's finest in precision crafted components, like the totally enclosed motors. the Voyagefs s rive brush configuration can wash a wide range of vehicles ranging from the smallest compacts to full size vans and pick-ups. A po'ptj' Al' rd feature is the on -board LED. sign that, among other things, prorriotes the exciting Voyager wash options to wal�(tig . 71 customers, as well as provides wash instructions to appreciative customers. So of the idea of a new generation of wash systems appeals to you, call for the name. of your local RYKO representative. Then come bii-<A, ,�., ._ yam, iwrt of the journey to quality and profirabie vehicle cleaning using advanced technology and engineering excellence. .f ^' iwr I�r >t-sfi IM aN SPECIFICATIONS Service Requirements Air /.❑hcr I D line at 100 PSI of 3 CFM Water: I Inch service it 40 PSI with 25 GPM flow. Electric 2081230 V AC, 60 Hi. 3 Phase h,.: n i:Iw Inl t'It'I 11,0 1, Ilwrt'ntt'I ti'. ;u1',rll:rinL) VI I',.I: jt'I nillu )111 With Standard Wlth With On -Board Unit Wheel Scrub Hot Wax Dryer 200V 35 AMP 40 AMP 70 AMP 100 AMP 230V 35 AMP 40 AMP 70 AMP 90 AMP 460V 11, AMP 20 AMP 30 AMP 45 AMP 575V 15 AMP 15 AMP 25 AMP 35 AMP Recommended Bay Requirements' Length 35 feet, 0 inches Width 15 feet. 0 Inches Height: 12 feet, 0 inches ' Wlrll lir Y.ifi>t I,I nn Iu,,u1111r,e'r'- RYKO Manufacturing Company reserves the right to make changes to specifications without notification. Contact your local RYKO representative for current specifications and other technical information. A "� RYKO Manufacturing Company 11600 N W. 54th Avenue • P.O. Box 38 • Grimes, Iowa 5001 • )515) 986-3700 • Fax )515) 986-3621 0 • • 12 90 10M 16084.003 ,et $' .. i AW >4 x : : I rr _ n 1l, o _ - y r . 1 r r« III Undercar Wash - �• The Vo/oger's Undercar WASH directs a - --.-.-- +� stril:a:; • strern r water. meIll In from rag t : aa• w sIre. vasIr vehicle's t'eeorb• ,I service deitanil':d by todafs `-"'•F�": cJr ::.ltl) cars!circr. L S parm!rig. nearly 116s.0 t'eGidef, the ').storyof RYKO Manufacturing Company is it chroncle of plo- ricer:ng ichiive- ITenaO in quality veh,lle wash tecriok)gy. The khrxl of people we ate fits Inc kind of products we offer. INS this cormn:bnent that has carried us the respect from sore of the worlds Lvgest conhpan:es. SERVICE: RYKO'S COMMITMENT BEYOND EOUIPMENTI RYKO Manufacturing Comp.try starxls te- hincl Its new Voyager and VoyTager XL with the. industrys Largest and most professional- ly trained national service nerAcrk. Each technician Its field-prmen inall areas of ser- vice txg.nning with ova -site installation to coordinating any one of RYKO's comprehen- sive preventive maintenance programs. Ad- dmoraiy: a full time, factorybased custom- er service staff is just a phone callar,ay from lending professional technical assistance. L �a� f Water -Removing WlperAssembly The innovitive RYKO .Wrper'Asiemby helps ensure a quality dry, byremoving excess water from the drip tray prior to ` the dry cycle. • `J• -•I ��1>"\• oney Making Options - Vni.lirl,s ru.rn Kwl d.::•�"„ .. ''- �•,,, •�V �• I Ier'1 Voh'nI- ;i�t'!I'lj towl5 :.. • %0XIa s swtow -' •r�. ' ri•' pt`.yr•';�j ��':.� '•Lnr� Ir.:• . i.r err'rl. .I nt:ri II .n•at• .r vile:] r;lnnn n!,I t:: •.!rl Th. •1 I��.'21f q.l.l:.l, Cl-,.I '.l'.1\ r1: l'1: IIS 1Y'Ij) 1: 1..; f:..I ,,- �-_-;�i�--� r .I:wll'S5111).:In:.•r111.151!'I h/.';';:Ir'n.l - _ .•5.1 . ,( Piled, pit. s�- � N V,'hccl Scrubbers - The lvheel Scn,: rvis .lie eq!rpped voth I~ ••. L1'g;'hrt.tllr•s. G mll)ie Cl elearlaul::hie• r • I'll 1 .. 'r 1 ' h Is,IS S. . sl"]'lief r.. 11.f•:LIII'('IS :fu! ha.v net -on ,- wiy pc;:n:ar An rp- r!;ILit RlLtl' .1 f1:1-Ill., I1 .•;11:!q.l!cr is '+ '%{•+fl: '•e asu.!:;!J.lu'r TP/':: rice•. xrrb:x•r lerlure ``'_ •:WSJ rus I:a'ec•i :e n lu!:I t cenlrr •v ith.ri Itself. tITo Gill the Vtry.lger just a car wash sys- - em is to severehy urldersate it. T!)e new genemuon'P8 Voyager is a fully self-contained vehicle wash I)rcf.tcenter. Its option -expandable, rrlodular design von furnish] any loi uun with the opportunity of prowdnag u0misted merchandising Vexibilay. Wirt the Introduction of the RYKO Voyrager, conventional industry buzzwords Like "free with h3"and-basic washcriV hlaveteensupplernenbrdtrynewones Lke "Multi Wash Options," "Customer Wash Upgrades" aril -Menu Pricing Strategies." In fact. the Voyager Ives. in Large p.lrt. elevated tx hrportancr of vehicle washing to Eric motoring pub!.c. . MERCHANDISING FLEXIBILITY WITHOUT COMPROMISING QUALITY - Ali across the US. petroleum marketers• e-store operators and private investors have d!scaere:d tre merchandising rewards gained by ad.•:.ng a Voyager autorr abc vehicle wash system to trxlr marketing strategies. rvlarry of to world's largest corm, p,+nies,h'r:e made tr)e RYKO Voyager an integral part of thrir total profit picture. In fact at kxatlorn Where menu pricing s:rairgies are used, enougn car wash revenues are being gen erased to pay forte equipment in ore year or less. Gut three's more to the Voyager Baanpnt its multi -vast) options that attracts anrf retains car wash] customers. The Voyager still provides one of the Lnest washes av'a.lable today. Its standard five brusl i cles:gn, featuring 0:1 fear side brushes, provide full con era ge cidar,:ng to .a wade range of vehicles: and it accomplishes this wru!e Operating completely attendant. free and occupying' less than h-a:f tie equ:pmert space tyrica.5y requaed for a con vvycrired system. Comact your local RYKO representatre to cliscr. ver the system vath something more pro.'cund to of.'er than just a car wash. D,scacr tie incred.ble prolitibday being experienced by tlou- satx:s cr locations ail across the U S. You it then learn wty we're vashirlg over a milLcn vehicles a dayt- i r -�.,J ' -' r + , O Oscillating. f high Volume 17. 13 Driver Instructional Sign - Air Dryers - It a O'I.t•r tntrt.cr•_n Il Sign is [seated m ;rrVcy,!:;eel lnua er,;l..jr,.f:!v.:::le.l• :he.:.)Ja:a n mod to IVI) q::ule each L: :. r.,1 ,1•r C,•,Pts :.1: ch d.: r!I ,) I:"ih •.r.;- :c'111c h• In Its p•cprr :,ltht paS:Uort The ..i c!.Ir,.Ii•,::; air q'.•r. l: :•I'::rr su:!.I(v _ �yM,.yk s•:j'1.l:sdq'.!'s.l:l::,lh^.I'11r15:'llc:'�.'It aria] l t:l•••u•nl!'r. le•rn:.,•:y nn•.P :.cirri Th!' WPM d,spldys •::,Ish eye:e e;:uons It .Ilsa r,•..,': 15 dor•cel:uoi:, I'., r:: �. r!^ric wish.] vilo: ns:l'c• c I nicrt,r to"h,Ick a.p"i t:!y r , I'd (L'S:1;a !: r. f:a.l• j6151 ll •!•,4b: d:l^n huh:!'. Ib I � F - cam• R i L .The widespread accepuince of auto:rmm civfi;cle Washing among Eric motoring public has brought Witt] it a number of etl.l:tenge•Stotligllv0!limest•tb[bew.lsbllocabonsl:kepetro!cumrrLirket:ngeperabCnsdnde-s:ire Uktlns.Howcwr,thp�_ foreinosb el these challenges to operators is ho;v they can offer a qua!Iry. multi -opt cis wash] in less than half of the' typical cycle time. ' RYKO Mianuf acturing Comparry responds to the dalenge try introducing the Voyager XL vehicle wa;h system. 6'6.,tor: ' cf.+n ,?s : ke th. r^ :, r. rd r .^ .•n ='s a:v: l:. ; ] :':::Ta• rc Its e ' -.:r:e Vir Vora: -r XL. a Elite fastest. ntu:ti-option n,P!]srs yYt rr.!irx:r'.. va•.hc ." .•s,..v.!.......hIi r]V:::uric•i1:+:GEL!:!,Undercar Wash. Wier S: :). 11:1 c: ...',b'` ' ox ..,I,: C:y. l :. ;..v . I. :: v.-I. w ..:es II... ......t n ...Inn, . !e• .[I :....:)r: er :..::u ,! ;,,st with a correspond] a dredse III G)f w.uh,g.lsoa ie ar d c-sl ai c i evenues. In the past, high -volume operators had to settle with slit v inflexible vehicle wash equipment. Today. matt] the RYKO Voyager XU high- wlurne locations are geared to pro isle any combination ofwash options f.hster and better. Add RYKO's patemed Code -A -Wash III car wash management system. and the new Dr.L'ar Bill Accepter Coln Box, and ycu II dhscaer a comp!etey:autorrlatic.'.g!ly profitable %chicle wash program. VOYAGER XL & FLEXIBLE PROGRAMMING ror locat.ons With lo:vvolume expecting a steady progiession to hl jher volumes, the Voyager XL is the perfect wish system. With minor program changes, the Voyager XL can ad: pt to any vvlu:ne fluctuations. A k e minute• fun option wish ran be reduced to less than three minutes. Cor✓ersety, for loca:ons twat wish to promote rxlri cleaning services, a twee minute wash can be increased to a rive minute wash. The merchandising a!IA promotional yens:dcratbrns are rim:doss. REVENUE GENERATING VOYAGER / VOYAGER XL OPTIONS & ACCESSORIES Th e a Voyager and Vayarer XL wash) systems can come rqupped wth marry epbons and additional .accessories. Onboard options include the a:l rev% High -Volume roam Bath. Undercar Wash. VAaeel Scrub, Het or Cold Wax aril Dyand a Top Brush Cover which prevents ce.5ng water from dripping onto the vehicle during lire dry cycle. Other eptienv accessories include the.ThrustPro dryer. The Thrustrio is the perfect companion to Brie Voyager XL for locations that require riaxblium vehicle throughput. This is easy accomplished since a vehicle can be washed while another receives a dry. The ' patented Code -A -Wash III computerized car wash management system a::own the operator the ablbty to control a car via rwrc]and!s:ngprogramfromoneconvenientpoinrof•sVeldeaucn The new as a 24 hour car wash salesperson. This RYKO unique system can accept arry combhnition of code• quarter or &-:tar bill activation. This . System can also be equipped whin RYKO's W.116 Communication System 1ConhSyst). This system uses pre-recorded voice messages and rtp:ays them at the coin box. Messages can be in the form of wash option upgrades or simple wash instructions. RYKO also provides a host cf oilier accesscrhes Re WICuums. water reclamation systems, and a sect -free rinse system. Wehaveavideo presentat!c-ncfthe newVoyager generation that can help bringEric marryeop.ibiIijesofthis remarkable washsystem hn:o sharper focus foryru. Just contutyrour lccal RYKO represenurtt.e• and thenyou'Il dhscovera wash system that riot only outperforns its competition• but completey outthinks them) t• Y.i� m .... . inJrn _ _ e, fir• •ti--��.�� ��; hI'`. � W ., ThrustPro Specifications Electric: 200,23OV, 3 Phase, 60HZ, IOOAMP or, 46OV, 3 Phase, 60HZ, SOAMP 575V, 3 Phase, 60HZ, 50AMP Air: Minimum 4.° I.D. line at 120 PSI at 1 CFM minimum flow, Maximum pressure of 150 PSI at 1 CFM minimum flow. Bay Dimensions: 'Length: 5110" Width: 15'0" Height: 12'fY Recommended total length of bay with combination ThrustPro and wash unit For isolated operation where ThrustPro is installed ar afrere-stand- ing unit. Length: 147 Width: 15'0" Height: 12'0" Contact your local RYKO representative for information about oper- ating in bays with smaller bay dimensions. IL A A VEHICLE DRYING SYSTEM EITHER WORKS K IT DOESN'T 0 ! Other ThrustPro Features Corrosion resistant, structural aluminum construction. • Four, 7'.,2 HP, phase-starled tan motors. • Rugged aluminum motor covers —prolongs motor life. • Hinged, rubber cushioned flaps on Follower —absorbs shook • from vehicles traveling excessively test WE'RE WASHING OVER A MIWON VEHICLES A DAY! RELIABLE • PROVEN + ACCEPTIM ISS RYKO Manufacturing Company 11600 NW 54th Ave. • Grimes, Iowa 50111 (515) 986-3700 • FAX (515) 986-3621 THE P KS! QUIETLY! EFFICIENTLY! 3191 65 165r33-002 P R I, L Y 1-7 Orumm I ET EFFICIEN 46 i ° ' ■ RYKO's ThruslPro and its un!quo "Follower" concept The RYKO ThrustPro Dryer is engineered by profession- ! ® RYKO has also incorporated many user-friendlyfeatures serves a dual purpose. First, tho Follower directs a high volume als who have been proudly achieving new levels of technical in the ThruslPro$ design. The unique ratchet system prevents of ambient air over the surface of the vehicle and removes rinse excellencofornearlytw•odecades.AndlikeallRYKOproducts, ! the Follower from coming incontact with the vehicle bykeeping a .. water —rather than merely relocating it. Second, the intelligent the ThrustPro is supported with a factory -trained nationwide ?, the Follower at its highest position during the entire dry cycle. 1Gir * Follower ad.. r, service network read.ly available to lend timely and profession- And by remaining at its highest position, the Follower avoids r - . with its own'., • • al technical ass:stanco. any contact even if a customer inadvertently backs up. ._ . tact. which ® An RYKO`r ThrustPro can be equipped with noise-ab- devices and y sorbing fan covers that help reduce the noiso output of the fans to a level that appreciative customers will enjoy returning to. ROFffABLE'': _70= Runs- ' Contact your local RYKO representative for Information f t• j - ✓ about RYKO's new.ThrustPro dryer. _ L... ® The complete Noise Reduction . Package includes the ®.The RYKO;ThrustPro is the perfect companion to any wash system! In fact; when accompanied with a RYKO automatic rollover noise -absorbing fan covers as well as noise -absorbing side veh!cle,wash system; location throughput can as much' as double with a corresponding increase in revenues. This merchandising pplenums and top Follower. This package effectively makes tho scheme Is quickly becoming the most popular because it provides the same services as a tunnel operation but requires only half the Thruslft one of the quietest dryers available today) equipment space and cost 6 • C A S W A S H Aurillaiy buslnossus such is Chrvruni Car Wash aru unpottant sor vw(?s to your community and they are important to Chevron Thewtoiq it is essential that the Car Wish survice budding be integrated with our Hallmark philosophy of o(houig the highest quality prod- ucts and customer services Ilia Hallmark building style is extunded to the Car Wash building by using appropriate materials, nou- tial colors and architectural details which are consistent with the Hallmark canopy and fueling areas Attractive signing is limited to only the minimum required to adequate- ly identify our branded services and provide customer information. 0 C A R W A S H nmrtllary businesses such as- Chrvnms Car Wash are important swvtr,s to your community and they aro important to Chevron Therohne, it is essential that tho Car Wash sorvtce building be intograted with our Hallmark philosophy of offering the highest quality prod- ucts and customer services. Tho Hallmark building style is extended to Cho Car Wash building by using appropriate materials, neu- tral colors and architectural details which are consistent with the Hallmark canopy and fueling areas. Attractive signing is limited to only the minimum required to adequate- ly identify our branded services and provide customer information. - T it E I1_ A- L L. Af A R K -C O N C E P- T - - Frainthe ground up, Chevron's _.w -- - .-•--,.- —.-- 11a0lm.ull st:aien has been d,si.fn:•d '! ,:a-: t wall yow cromnun:ty in rnind The - sira:h+ nrehaecttm:, span ldyaut, neutral building colors, materials " + ' and tllaphics have been carefully to it� ■j.,,•�,�„�yi� .,,■,..+p .�+� selectrn y ttvr ,�G 1 to meet our customers' nes- •Yw •+1�r i9 t:• ~dP •♦ _ thatic and functional needs. The •~ - - - - i'. Lb.•ntthration of CYt :1 s+..�.-- e .y r ' .im: ntt n+s, p:nd::ct o!lcnn:ls and- B prices has been highly integrated 'IF -.-.A 241lfS PA to communicate a controlled and t,,,• / r consistent message. I ' P. i 46 to c u rs w A s H rtn.-ill.+ry businesses such as chcvion:c Car Wash arc important set virnx to your community and they are important to Chevron. Thi;mhutq it is essential that the Car Wash ;,or vice building be integrated with our Hallmark philosophy of olferniq the highest quality prod- ucts and customer services. The hallmark building style is extended to the Car Wash building by using appropriate materials, net)- tml colors and architectural details which arc consistent with the Hallmark canopy and fueling areas Attractive signing is limited to only the minimum required to adequate- ly identify our branded services and provide customer information. CITY OF CUPERTINO RECEIPT No. 75208 DATE —/�l �22%� RECEIVED FROM eea CASH CNECR 40"', ORDER DOLURS CENT! CITY OF CUPERTINO RECEIPT No. t J F i �.1�111f1�11�1>•II�IIIIII�I���I�� (E) TREES TO BE REMOVED# (TYP. OF 10) 1 v , , ry M r>•�w I�Oi�#�I�I�A��.��IWIIIIII�����r� TReE #7 TO TREE #11 TO (E) PARKING TO REMAIN FBE REMOVED BE REMOVED EUCALYPTUS, 62"DIA. MON�rEy E, 5" DIA. / i _._. / WIN — -----� " — �-- MEN= �roo'oo' 1.76 / \ ` WINDTR"Y� ig vmm Ins .. um 1�.,w� w � HImumm . y12 TO I I 1 BE REMOVED I BE REMOVED I I I I I MONTEREY P4, 5" D, I / MONTER Y PSNE, 5" DIA. �� — '�� \ / / o ® 1 �p{ID1 E= C= E_ / (N) TRANSFORMER # Wrr ; / TREE y6 TO o _ Os 0 3 O of / BE REMOVED ��rr ,_, ,._/1 EUCALYPTUS, TREE #' T TREE 5 TO 53" DIA, \ 10 (N) "MAX. CLEARANCE" / BE REMOVED / OVERHEAD SIGN SEE(Id 1 / EUCALYPTUS, BE REMOVED \ �' 12 DIA, EUCALYPTU I (N) 10 x 10 TRASHb /�,� ' 9 13" DIA. ENCLOSURE SEE TREE (14 TO BE REMOVED — EUCALYPTUS, 24" DIA, \ / (N) AIR/WATER ISLA / ` 8 w/ YARD LIGHT TREE Np TO / (N) (6) 9'-0" x 19e016 (N) CAR WASH KEYPAD j- �(�, �a 1 BE REMOVED PARKING SPACES \ TRT'EE' & YARD LIGHT \ EUCALYPTUS, / \\ \ L ,1 (N) (1) 16'-0"x1 ' 0" �'�► IBE RE OVED / 24 DIA. HANDICAP PARKI G I CALIFORNIA„r+It (N) ELECTRICAL CABINET ;' `� 1 -O� SPACE W/ HANDICAP _0 15 DI . fi _ 11J', , , (N) INTERNALLY I i i PARKING SIGN— (N) CA ASH INSTRUCTIONA \ (: _ , — ILLUMINATED PANEL 9 / _ _ — — - 3 12,000 GAL. � \ � � � � Chevron WORDMARK (N) ENTRANC XIT SIGN VRA— FUEL STORAGE , ' (TYP. OF 2) TANKS , fa (TYP. OF 2) 8 -' (N) 38 x 85 CANOPY / �i I SEE SHEET 3 1 / I (N) RM-2 SALES (N) MASONRY SOUND WALL— I BUILDING (1,306 SOFT. & r , CARWASH (1150 SOFT, 7 7 NORTH FACE, SEE c10 % I 2: � I I �� — — ( (HT. 15-0") SEE SHEET 2 7 $ I 1� - - - - - J1- - - i.; _ F I i -- --T F----- i I I i ----- i r ----- i I r ----I- i � I (" — — — — — � — — 2 (N) INTERNALLY I � I I I m — I ILLUMINATED I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I ; r I "Food Mort" . u O I 1 I I I I 111 I t i 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 l l A I FF 199.80' I I FF 200r60' i iII I,--(E) AUTO SERVICE 1 1 I 1 1 11 4~ �_ I __ ____� 11-0.�) _____� I I L___ _J i x I I 1 -- 1 1 BUILDING TO BE 1 6 N LEVEL 1 REMOVED SPANNER ion.I I I I I (TYP. of 3 I I�` I I r- ---iI r-----i r-----i r-----i -----T r---1-i TREE TO REMAIN co • 1 i t I 1 1 1 1 /' I I RNI 1 f l S I I I I 1 I I I I I I � I II 1 N 18')_IpOARNIA PEPPER % ' I 11 I i 110 iII l t �l/13 L I L----- ,_ „ ADJACENT APARTMENT I I i 'I (N) (6) DISPENSERS 7 7 4 I COMPLEX CARPORT I I 8 I ,. I w/ GUARD POSTS, , I I I 1 TRASH VALETS, & /—(E) U.G. TANK ANDxx / P,O.S, FRAMES / SLAB TO BE / / 0 / REMOVED / (E) SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER TO REMAIN uu- TREE #1 TO REMAIN CALIFORNIA PEPPER 31" DIA. - (E) TRANSFORMER U Q 0 W a a 1 Q 0 0 I W � Q Q I r SW G 0 } (E) SIDEWALK, CURB I & GUTTER 45'-1" (OF STREET TO PROPERTY LINE O (N) INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED C-25 LOGO I I 3 (N) INTERNALLY ( I I I.TI �) I / (E) PLANTER AREA 1 am / 0 J `I----� u `--_ N / I „ ILLUMINATED I 1 113 -3 I o ( (E) CANOPY, DRIVE SLAB, PUMP ISLANDS "Corwash N I & DISPENSERS TO BE REMOVED / / / (E) FIRE HYDRANT // TO REMAIN 10 I I I (N) YARD LIGHT / \ 11 I 1 I I (TYP OF 8) (E) MONUMENT SEE@19 O TO BE REMOVED IGN (E) SIDEWALK •I o �I I I •y p•���� CURB & GUTTER 0 Ar goo _ �� �, " R 290.00' (N) HANDICAP AP N OO='00' 9310' -u u'S8' N _ — RAMP GRADES TO — — _ — _ — — _ _ — — — - �- ' APPROACH l � MATCH EXISTINGIf I /I L J _ (N) C-45 MONUMENT SIGN O1 (N) SIDEWALK SEE AI3 CURB & GUTTER 3 W Z_ E APPROACH, SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER TO BE RECONSTRUCTED a W 1 m la 0 W W N 3 L1. 0 w 0 5 10 20 30 40 SARATOGA—SUNNYVALE ROAD %M%=7 DE ANZA BLVD, k---- — — f — — — — — — — — — ICI 1 1 MAP 0 WI 11J 11 li 10 IV s vrFaa,-;. x,. Y"+ Ya:... v ;r, r, . ;. i.Sry «sro : vM'4rH4 W"s»:e• S+.v <.AY.-.-i.',hdal.s.MJ"�M?k+?,-n.1,n•.h.Y.-"lwf'C�'#.ttfeaYS.Y.^^^£tA.. 1p.+'t�sSLf'.'+pc'.fArt'*oSIN.'%4RY.:.4�h'£.iY?vR-{"u., .'i� r`vN.rT.A:tv�.. t ^K'? .. .... ... .. �. ... .. .. �-�'r-'('�'T'��'(�­''r'�'�('T'��'j"��T'�'j'�'�''j j �j''j�j" I I I TI I 21 I 3I 1 41 I CI I �9I ® I 11 21 3 4 6 8 B 9 1 11 12 13 141 16 on 21 aM1�W MEA CALCULATi0N l 89lTISf,N Ii9307191513M FRWY, SEE O SHT. 3 SEED SHT 2 SEE SHT Q SEE 4 SHT. J SEE 5 _ SHT.3 SEE O SHT. 3 SEE 7 SHT. SEE 3 80 N,T.& SHT .2 SEE 9 SHT. 2 SEE 10 SHT. 2 I I (I INT. - INTERNALLY PROJECT 8Uu MMY DIV\SR\PROMM 1 SITE AREA NET AREA 34.068 SOFT. • 0 782 ACRES GROSS AREA 55.020 SOFT. 1.263 ACRES BUILDING AREA SALES BUILDING _ 1,LQ5_ SOFT. CAR WASH 1150 SOFT. CANOPY 3230 SOFT. FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) (BUILDING AREA - NET SITE AREA) 2456 - 34068 - 000720 7% NUMBER OF STORIES HEIGHT SALES BUILDING CAR WASH -1$ CANOPY 1 -0 BUILDING PAD ELEVATION ±200.66 CURB ELEVATION t200 55 (CURB NEAREST BUILDING) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES PROJECTED I (EMPLOYEE RATIO/1000 SO.FTr) PARKING REQUIRED 1 PROVIDED (TOTAL) EMPLOYEE _I — TOTAL —19 SALES BLDG - 24 HOURS HOURS OF OPERATION CARWASH - 7am TO J2m EXSTING USE SERVICE STATION PROPOSED USE SERVICE STATION MIN -MART ZONING DESIGNATION PLANNED GENERAL COMMERCIAL GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION GENERAL COMMERCIAL1 ADJOINING LAND USE NORTH -MULTIFAMILY, EAST -HISTORICAL LANDMARK PAVING AREA 20,771 SOFT. _JLX OF TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA —8717_ SOFT. _j X OF TOTAL LEGEND / (N) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NEW t (E) . EXISTING (TYP) . . . . . . . . . . . . . TYPICAL ❑ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EXISTING TO REMAIN NEW L J . . . . .. . . . .. . . .EXISTING TO BE REMOVED 1 FF 00.00' . , . FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION APPROVED BUILDING OUTLINE PER CITY COUNCIL #17-U-90 SEE SHEET 1.1 ( . . . . . . . CENTERLINE 1 0 PARKING SPACES F SIGN I ¢ TOTAL AREAF rT�t1 AREA SIGN TYPE (SOiT.) W PROPOSED SIGN PANEL C-45 69 INT N I 6.9 FREESTANDING PRICE SIGN C-45 194 INT N 1 19.4 FREESTANDING LD. SIGN C-45 19.4 INT N 1 19.4 'Food Mart' ON SALES SLOG 158 INT N 1 15 8 'Car Wash' 135 INT N I 135 'ChsNon' ON CANOPY 116 INT N 2 27.2 LOGO ON CANOPY C-25 43 INT N 1 43 LOGO ON SPANNER 2 4 INT N 6 14.4 DIRECTIONAL SIGNS (ON SPANNER) 0.75 INT Y 6 -- ENTER/E)UT CAR WASH 98 -- 4.0 2 11.6 CAR WASH INSTRUCTIONS 100 -- 4.0 1 6.0 MAAMUM CLEARANCE 140 - 40 1 100 TOTAL SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE i�•5 2 /17/93 REVISED PIER PLANNING REOr R.J.P. 1 7/21/93 REVISED BUILDING EC CANOPY R.J.P. MI DATE WVIeIONB CLY COUNCIL SITE PLANved PLAI VIN tW DE MA BUR-1 CUPERT'NO, CAbeh l d t I I13 J G l ned � Chem w N u vent R9gI0t1 E ®ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. AnufTrCTtA'11111 lrMlONMEWAL 1111a1MCM 1131 NORTH McDOMELL BOULLVARD PETALUMA CA 94954 (701) MS-1660 JOIN W. JOINSON. ARCHITECT JAMES H. RAY, CIA ENGINEER MHL NgVI HITIAL pAMTE DATE: 17SEP93 PREUM NARY PLANNING OR. By. '`rr1 o STEEL BID 9M PERMIT APPR.. GENERAL BID RNL / 8937.10 POUT REVS CONSTRUCTION SHEET Do not use drawing 1 for construction less Inlllded R I I A I k i i I I 1 7 f! A K it •f •. n sn w •n •� .a u a•. ..r. ... • / f I 1 • rrrrr rr ► /r I 11 r mull rr �ulrr Nr 1/N Nr Iwml � urr rNu ��/rrnlnN�llrrrrinr�lrrnlln>,rrrnrnu• 1/ �rru�rrrrlrr�urrrullrrrrluu�l/rNt�rr •rrllunnrlllrrlrll� 1INIA►AIAI■I■IAIYI■INIYI/IAIYIMI/IAI/IAINIy/If:YIAIAIr1A1AIAI/I•iIA1/IPIAI/INIYINI/IYI/I■I■IAIAIAI/IApINI/IAIAIf,AI/IrI/IYI/11+IYt/Iw� ' ' 1/.INI/IMI/ly/1/I/f/I/I/IY!/IAIrINtAI/!/I/t/!NI/t/!NI/IMI/lYlAtrl/1/I/IrINIAIAININ1NINl/I/IYIN!/IMINT/IYIf11M1/INI/tY, AIAIAINIAIAIsINIAlAININININIAIAIAIAIAIMINIAIAIAIAIIINI/IAININjolt,INIAloisININIAINININtNI�ININIAINININININISIRla!'imil NINlNIA1NtNININININI�, �INININIAlNIN1AININt/fAININIAININIAINIAIAIAI/!/lAIAINIAI■IAI/lAINIAIAINININI�ININIAIAIAlN1NlNlNININIalai NlAINlN1AINl/IAIM' t/ t A l A I N I N I A I N I N I N I N t N I N IN I NIN INI NI A I N I A I A I/ I ■I A L A I11I A I N I N I N I A I N I N I A I/ 1 NIA t N t N IN INI A 1 N I/ I A I N I N I A IA I N I/ I N IA I N I /,AI AIAI A IN I NI N ININ IA I►+IA I N I NIN I NI �. ��N IN I N t NI NI N!N I N ININ IN INIA I N IN ININ I N I NI N I N I N I /INI /! / lot /tA IA IN I N tN I N I MINIM I N IN I N I N I R I NI MINI N I N ININIh N I�ININ IN t/1NlN1NINIA IN I N INI' 1 • • 111161-flosill,I/tAIsIAININI/INININ!/UNIYININIAI/tNININI/IAINIAIAIAIYt/I/IAIN1/1A1NININ1A1RiNININI/iAININtAINININININININI II/IAI/IN ININININININININI/INIAININININh`� • O ��INININININI/I�INININIAININININININIAININIAIAINININININININININIAININININIAINININIAINI/ININININININININININIAINIAININININIwIA1NININtNININIY ` ALIGN WITH BOTTOM was _ "Food Mort" LETTERS _I f_ Io•s■�YA� r_ J� 1 1 1 • - i 1 �����I WINDOW FRAME & DOOR FRAME - I.. STUCCO TEXTURE OFF-WHITE /l /r WALL 12 12 I� MODIFIED HIP ROOF 51 -IAI■t�tAt■i■tit■iAtNlNtrtrt■t■trt■I■iMtMl■IAtrl■tYlAt■I■t�!■t■tNl■IAI/IAtNtrIYItAIMt�I■I■IAtAIAl�trt/IAt/iAt�lYlAtMtAINtMINtNi■i■1►o 5 W/ SPANISH TILE I0 IAIAIAINIAININIAINIAIAIAINIAIAIAIAINININIAINININININININININIAININIAIAINIAIAIAINIAIAIAIAIAINIAIAIAIAIAIAIAINtNIAINIAINIAIAIAtNINIAlA1N1AI'I IAIAININININIAIAININIAIAINIAINIAIAIAINIAININIAININIAINIAININIAIAINIAININININIAtAIAININIAIAIAINIAINIAIAIAINIAIAIAIAtAINIAININIAINIAINIAINIAINIAININ ! .I INIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIa1A1A1AIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAIAININIAIoil. , I I FASCIA. STUCCO — 7 s IWO q 0 t_ REAR ELEVATION C a�tea 9 OFFICE I UTILITY I ❑ I 0 8 I r � WALK-IN COOLER I � I L SCORED NORTH FACE COMBED FACE (TYPICAL) 8" X 8" X 16" 6" X 8" X 16" SPLIT FACE dE SCORED SOUTH FACE SPLIT FACE WCTION AA ® SCALE: 1-1/2"=V-0" G10 SOUMIWALL E.EVATION AS NOTED • H A10 ROOF �.aN 3/T•'rl'-O• .. S�F�.. iby'd #k..vax2itii. Hnw�JPP•YitrMT�xuwa.-_.... �.�.-...w,w A&1Wa4YaisciwKWN�ua.uii.Am,814bJii4�Ma-' '.,,� -._+pv COOLER CONDENSER ROOF ACCESS HVAC CONDENSERS CUBER CONDENSER- VSAT --, © I 11 41 3 1 4 6 [}► FRESH AIR DUCT td 111 112 13 14, 15 I IN 9 CARWASH INSTRUCTIONS PANEL SIDE ELEVATION D Ix ml-no �T1 I~1\ Ww 111I "lY SCALE: 1 /4"=11-0" t 12'-d" r-_ 2 /17/9 REVISED PER PLANNING REQUIREMENT RJP 1 7 21/9 REVISED BUILDING & CANOPY RJP U e DATE I FKVN lONs I Ilr nm. SALES/CARWASH BUI AND SOUNDWALL EL 9-F= Signed a 11M DE ANZA Date CUPERTINO, CA. PLA NIN igne Chemitto c'' �3 011111 RCH. & SI'[G c O PliJi Northwest Regj� � ®ROBERT H. LEE do ASSOCIATES, INC. AROHIT'onaa /Hama a fvna/AEl+rAL eianw 1137 NORTH Ne00TSE11. BCIAEVARO PETALIAIA CA 94954 (707) 765-1660 law W. JOHNSON• ARCHITECT JAM H RAY. CAt 091M F* L PIEVEW KnAL DA'1'e DATE: 17SEP93 PAILWARY PLANI,N10 OR. BY. (All 11 swn ao oO PETnrr APPR.: T-6 A GENERAL IRD aIt / E937.10 PER4eT REVS SHEET CONSTRUCTION 00 not use 6a11N+9 for construction (� unless Initiated 10 1V 1I W le• mm 7L1 I ' j CANOPY FRONT ELEVATION 8 10 fl 12 a 14 to 1 to 17 1e 1 19 20 0 0 0 0 HUNG BLADE SIGN CHAIN 8'-0" LONG, 16 ga. SHEET METAL BLADE SIGN - BLUE 15'-0" INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED "Chevron" WORDMARK WHITE WITH BLUE RETURNS (13.6 SO -FT) (TYP, OF 2) FASCIA, STi OFF-WHITE INTERNALLY LOGO 4.3 c INTERNALLY 'SPANNER' WITH LOGO (TYP. OF 6; INFORMATIO PANEL BLU( TRASH RECI FUEL DISPEL,,... LATCH CANOPY SIDE ELEVATION 20 GA DAn.. WALL PAN u RM ELEVATION G16 TRASH eVmmm e.EVATIQN /8•■1'-0• "371\893713\G16 LETTERS - BLACK HALLMARK BACKGROUND - WHITE 10 WHITE LETTERS PERIMETER BACKGROUND DCL 405 4» 8'-5 1/2» - DK. GREY vi 4 BLUE TRANSLUCENT STRIPE DARKSTEEY Z 1 1/2" RED TRANSLUCENT STRIPE 4' -2 4 A-2 TRANSLUCENT GRAPHICS, TYP -WHITE o LIGHTED PRICE SIGN, TRANSLUCENT BACK- GROUND, TYP - BLUE Do 6001 HIGH POINT a0 \ a= 6001 SIGN CABINET - DK, GREY ` 'o d 0.00i TRANSLUCENT RULE LINE PAVING I - RED i— —I -- CURB Do ` -0 •- ADDITIONAL PROFIT CENTER •- SIGN BACKGROUND, TYP - DK, GREY �- BASE & COLUMN COVERING WITH LPS & APC SIGN STUCCO - DK. GREY F FKW ELEVATION FINISH GRADE STREET ADDRESS. 5" HIGH NUMBERS DARK GREY ON WHITE BACKGROUND We. BLADE SIGN & STEEL SUPPORT TO BE PERPENDICULAR TO CURB. A10 CLEAF MCE 8M A13 c-45 HAuLmAw WIONUIuteff �QN 8 o io 12 a14 to to n to TIT 111�91 I I,11 11 I 2I 1 31 I 4I I EI • I ® I 11 !d 3 4 6 8 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 1b L s 21 APPROVED CITY Itignud Date $1gneC�: Date :...-jNfh,,u REY ITE If I TI-It,AL) e 0 (D 111111' 1 MG 2 P/16/931 REVISED PER PLANNING REQ. R.J.P. t 21/931 REVISED BUILDING & CANOPY R.J.P. MARKI DATE I RiV1111pN8 r�fnAt. CANOPY AND MONUMENT SIGN ELEVATIONS 11010 DE MCA RA) CUPEFMNO, CA. IQ Chevron M tf1mt E ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. AMCHTT80f M 9 *XMINV9l40 W V "NMPITALat811RCM 1131 NDRTN Mc0owm OWLEVARD PETALUMA CA. 94"4 (707) 755-1660 J" W. XWSM, ARCMTECT DAMES N RAY. CIML (NORM F*L !!VIEW MAL DAM DATE; 17SEP93 PRE! WARY �y,�� DR. BY, _* "' A.ANMNGif— y'� Wk. 4c{L e937 I .t0 STEEL ma sm PEAMT GENERAL N PUNT REVS CansTRucnoN srct. 00 not eH dr�9 for eOnLrVetlon 3 unit» fnitklod Y i R t J I RI P N i M L �i �� IIIIIIIIIIA U c B U 1 2 3 4 t3 a 1 1 VA e E of 11 1 12 1 13 1 14 F.) 2 SF) 15 L 17 024 tsP I Lp. 18 to 1 20 1 21 PLM LEGEND CADMA5IR\C.EN\02$i TE0\029k01G - TMBOI SIZE OTT, S, MATURE HEIGHT BOTANICAL NAME CONAME R TRIES T—I 48' BOX 1 40' - CEDRIS DEODARA BEGGAR CEDAR T-2 36" BOX 6 25' - PRUNUS C 'BUREANA PURPLE LEAF PLUM T-3 36' BOX 4 i ' - OVERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 1-4 36' BOx 3 40' - SEQUOIA SEMPERVIRENS �GAD SHRUBS S-1 5 GAL. 2 5' - ALYOGYNE HUEGEUI BWE HIBISCUS S-2 S GAL. 9 4 _ ARCTOSTAPHYLOS D 'HOWARD McMINN MCMINN' MANZANITA 5-3 5 GAL, 10 6' — CEANOTHUS 'FROSTY BLUE' FROSTY BLUE CALIFORNIA ULAC N S-4 I GAL, 76 2T - ESCALLONIA 'NEWPORT DWARF* DWARF ESCALLONIA S-5 5 GAL, 13 4' - ESCALLONIA 'FRADESI' ESCALLONIA S-6 I GAL 47 2' - HEMERCALUS 'HYBRID' RED OAY LILY 5-7 15 GAL, 1 12• _ LEPTOSPERMUM NEW ZEALAND SCOPARIUM TEA TREE S-8 1 GAL 91 4' - NANDINA DOMESTICA 'HARBOR HEAVENLY M DWARF* BAMBOO VACS V-1 I GAL, 1 N/A - EUONYMUS F. 'RADICANS' COMMON WW TER CREEPER GROUNOCOVERS GC-t t CAL. I'4 S 0 12, _ ARCTOSTAPHYLOS U 'PT. REYES' BEAR81 RRY III* O.C. L GC-2 FLATS 19390 6• _ VIOLA LABRADORICA VIOLET 8" O.C. GC-3 t GAL 903 O.C. SF 0 12"COLOR W - PETUNIA 'HYBRIOA' REDAS PETUNIA CHANGE SEASONALLY NOTES. I. A COMBINATION OF DRIP. BUBBLERS AND/OR LOW GALLONAGE SPRAYS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ALL PLANTERS ALL IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE EOUIPED WITH A CONTROLLER CAPABLE OF DUAL PROGRAMMING K 2. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH WESTERN FIR BARK. 3/4 MINUS OR APPROVED EOUAL, TO A MIN, DEPTH OF 2' J H F E I APPROVED Ci,. _01JIICIL tiIAFiK OATS I FEVI[NIONB M'RTW- Signed—. Date_ LANDSCAPE PLAN "A dh:; 'Ob1;*M1,0N Signe _ 9-5700 Cr Date. �. l l �13 10" GAG► Pr�� , tM DE MCA B.w. ARCH. 6 :.:c WNLH L 12 �/� �� Cq rna� ) CLFEFMNO, Qk Signed DatA,c_-- 14 , Chevron 1 '� u est n� 0 5 10 20 30 40 B SARATOGA—SUNNYVALE ROAD ® R cmnvcT r H. LEE & AesoclA-rE91 INC. Af1Ch.T1lb71Jt'! �iorleel.No �rAII!llMa. 1137 M NORMcDOMETI. BOULEVARD PETALUMA CA. 94964 (707) 765-100 DE ANZA BLVD. �""W J01NN5"' ARCHITECT HrnAL DATERADATE: 175EP93 PRELIMINARY — — — — — — — — — — — — PLANNING DO. BY, S G STEEL Be r BLOC PERMIT APPR. �a l ' A GENERAL W RHL p 8937.10 PERMIT REVS pCO�NSTRUCTION SHEET f not us4 *awing /) I _...—....-. 0 I e I ' I 8 _ I I I I t2 T I 17 I._ ._.__T... unlaiinlpdee �{ 2 3 4 13 14 Is le '19 I 20 T 21 �i�TT'T fT'—>T',—� r,—r,—r TT'�—T�, rl (�j"11 4 ® I 11 3 4 6 B 9 1 11 12 13 14, 16 1 r � f OE ft Bt POAVVI scalun y uonxulsuoa bwlaoip an low op U318 NDUYWSW3 0I1068 11Na Shia Luw3d 010 1ra3N30 • ayly 1 W13d 'WM 09 1331S a0 .._ DWWfId AUYNlM3ad M35e1 'XVO I UVC -rfUJMI M7A41d -M tl3 t0 1Nq 'Ara N S31M• 1D3LUDNr •NDSNW M NHOP Mi-f.St (LOL) III Y3 rN11r13d OWAIWB 'I H1aON Lttl MOW" -W '0NI 'B31b�tOOt3t31y ;V aa-1 •H J.N=-390N Wk Imm UCJAB43 • r • / • 1 1 11 NYI ONUHJI"l ONOIBIAm"•I Alva Akllvw 0 S310 NV01003 = 03 'Z '1 1 I 3A3 ONf102!`J ON HOtl321 S1H 11 0 30 13111111113 3 I 8 0 1 030N31N 0NV DV LL ryV21`JVI 0 38V NMOHS V 0 S SO 321dS ONLLH Il 9 3Hl l :S31ON ( ) 03 9-1 El (t7 RINIMI) '03 81 a >d AN NVId olw WAS1LO mon OW 6LJ t, t----T I 1 1 I ---r 3_ -x 30raa 3�ve ean� ;'!' � fp+p 1ranlrN 33v anS, awA r E k w 7 tr Y A18113SSr 13M)raB ONr 310d 'OS ,9 H11M 3131d►W '3anNlnnl 3GnYH WAR H3dnS M OOt 30r! Sam /M 3WNtfln1 !O 33r3 NON o1v0 pnur)t ITT--)-T--a1pa aubrs trill IPI);rcj 1FoufilS Oa at .. u `GAIB VZNV 90 dbOd :11VAANNns-vooilvim OY Of OZ 01 S 0 .:':'.'.....'... ....... ..... ..... z: ............... .......... ..•.....•...•..•...... ,BS,tt►lY V C6 OD0000 N r.. ' QQ'Q '..'. ... ..... .. �.'�� .........: . ... ... '.�>.. .... .... ..... .. .. .. ... 4 (: _- . . .........•......................... . .. ......... o..... vri :: .... _ _.. 0 ...:........ :: ' , . .. ti .. ti _.. . ..._. .. .. .................... .................. •.........�:....:•::':.':::•::'::::•::::•::':::•:•::: .... ::::: .�: �:: .. ... .. :: _ 91 _ '.. ..: :................ o .: ..:. _ .... _ . ................... ............. . ..... . :.... 1: ... "' .... ............. 0 II I I 0 0 II I I 0 p II 0 II II II .J.. (81 30 'dll) S1HO11 .,. I�':':. I I I I I I AdONv� M004 03SS3�3a 0 I I p 0 p I I I I p I I I I I I= f .. u I .. O I I�I I 0 p I I p p I I p '^ _ _ 1' g O :. _.. I' .. rn .. . .. rr . D .... _ _ (7 _. .... .. ..............:: . 5t. ... �o -: O D . _ - ..... ... .. ... ......-. _ _. . _ / . . �: ® .. . _ ... / _ _.. - _ •....... ... 1HOn oav� .. .... - _ .....I....• ..............•....... . _ ". ...... 61� l 1H1 3�3 9 H ... _.. ( dAl) V38V Od38dS 1H011 Cam. ':.:.C. {.. •: II �I `� at I Pt ' vtI Ot ' zt S b L 3008 ON10108 8 to a L" 4. w O N O ia =I H r N el 0 R. R P N L K J H OI F E 1 2 3 1 4 6 a 7 9 10 V E 12 1 13 1 14 1 16 1 16 L_ 17 L_ 18 n M 00 A 0 z 0 z Q ' LC (E) TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP. OF 10) F(N) TRANSFORMER m � ^�sw� SUN mom��� � . ' � 00'00'00�� m 18r.1 �� m men/♦1� ss m wr_rrs�. wm, m ��m m m .�� New New / r■ / I e \ \ (N), "MAX. CLEARANCE" / / OVERHEAD SIGN / I I / (N) 10' x 10' TRASH N) PLANTER ENCLOSURE \ TYP) I / (N) AIR/WATER ISLAND /� / ` ®/ , \ ,/ w/ YARD LIGHT _ l \ 1ao'� (N) (6) s'—o" x 1s'zo" �\ ` ® 1 �1 V\` (N) CAR WASH KEYPAD PARKING SPACES \ / & YARD LIGHT / \\ \ /L (N) (1) 16'-011xi 0" \1 HANDICAP PARKIG (N) ELECTRICAL CABINET I �� SPACE W/ HAND16AP (N) CAR WASH INSTRUCTIONAL i \ / / PARKING SIGN PANEL ">(3} 12,000 GAL. 1 1 — \ 1 N) ENTRANCE/EXIT SIGN 9 FUEL STORAGE — TANKS TYP. OF 2) 1 (N) 38 x 85 CANOPY I SEE SHEET 3 ,1 1 / \ .. N) INTERNALLY (N) RM-2 SALES `` / ILLUMINATED (N) MASONRY SOUND WALL - I 1 BUILDING (1306 SQ.FT.) & "Chevron" WORDMAR I r CARWASH (1149 SQ.FT.) 7 4 (TYP. OF 2) of I 1 (HT. 15'-0") SEE SHEET 2 I ( IF---- �.�+. 7 -- ---- II II F i 1L__-- .11____I -- I I I I I I I F — — — — (N) INTERNALLY w ILLUMINTATEDto M I 1 8 I 1 "Food Mort" 8 I 8 I 4 1 of I fF 199.80' FF 200.60' I 2 'I I `l I (N) LEVEL I 6__.{ z 1 (E) AUTO SERVICE SPANNER I I I I 11 I BUILDING TO BE (TYP. OF 3) I 3 I I I I 111 I REMOVED I I I I16 1 I�rq (E) TREE TO REMAIN I I -I I I I co I I I I I 18 17 5 IL--- -----L _ Ja r♦ M !!� �� M � !� 1 1 I 25'- C i J / 1'-3 „ I I I (N) (6) DISPENSERS 7 I 7 4 I 3 9 1 I w/ GUARD POSTS, I I I I I TRASH VALETS, & / -*/ — (E) U.G. TANK AND P.O.S. FRAMES / SLAB TO BE / �� / / 1 APPROVED 20 -9" x 46 -8„ 1 REMOVED / 7 J (N) INTERNALL i `i— — — JI. 1�I` — — — SALES BUILDING & 35' x 108' CANOPY N ILLUMINATED I (E) CANOPY, DRIVE SLAB, PUMP ISLANDS / (N) C-4�5 ONUMENT SIGN / LAN I E h I I o: 1 & DISPENSERS TO BE REMOVED PLANTERS I I � � J SEE SHEET/ 3 0to 1 I 1 1 I I ,// I I I N) YARD LIGHT ^� 1 1 1 I TYP OF 8) / /, tir a I y�\•�900 � II I D \\ N 00000'00" 93.10' �— — =M14 58 PPRp �G App -- f -1 H LL- LJ - (E) APPROACH, SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER TO BE RECONSTRUCTED SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE ROAD 2 LT I i DE ANZA BLVD. 7 (E) TREE TO REMAIN (E) TRANSFORMER U 0 Q 0 OfQ a a 0 Q r 0 cr u))i 0 (E) SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER (N) INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED C-25 LOGO (E) PLANTER AREA (E) FIRE HYDRANT TO REMAIN A=1'42'13" R=30.00' L=0.89' —(E) MONUMENT SIGN TO BE REMOVED (N) HANDICAP RAMP (N) SIDEWALK CURB & GUTTER 0 5 10 20 30 40 , 8 0 10 it 12 13 14 I oI I 11 I 4) I d i �nl II11'lll I'll 21 3 4 6 8 9 1 11 12 13 (E) SIDEWALK CURB & GUTTER 1s V !�.ill17.4_n% lno 20 SIGN AREA CALCULATIONS c93nsGN r (J Y. 19930719.151336 R SIGN I a Y F TOTAL AREA�{AREA 1 SIGN TYPE (50FT.) �x PROPOSED SIGN PANEL C-45 6.9 INT N 1 6.9 FREESTANDING PRICE SIGN C-45 19.4 INT N 1 19.4 FREESTANDING I.D. SIGN C-45 19.4 INT N 1 19.4 'Food Mort" ON SALES BLDG 15.8 INT N 1 15.8 "Car Wash" 13.5 INT N 1 13.5 "Chevron' ON CANOPY 13.6 INT N 2 27.2 LOGO ON CANOPY C-25 4.3 INT N 1 4.3 LOGO ON SPANNER 2.4 INT N 6 14.4 DIRECTIONAL SIGNS (ON SPANNER) 0.75 INT Y 6 -- P.O.S. FRAME 3A - N 6 20.4 ENTER/EXIT CAR WASH 9.8 -- Y 2 -- CAR WASH INSTRUCTIONS 10.0 -- Y I -- MAXIMUM CLEARANCE 14.0 -- Y I -- TOTAL SIGN SQUARE FDOTAGE 141.3 P N in PROJECT SUMMARY DIV\SR\PROJSUM L SITE AREA NET AREA 34,068 SQ.FT. 0,762 ACRES GROSS AREA 55.020 SQ.FT. 1.263 ACRES BUILDING AREA SALES BUILDING 1.306.25 SQ.FT. CAR WASH IA49.5 SOFT. CANOPY 2.204 SQ.FT. TOTAL 4.660 SQ.FT. FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) (BUILDING AREA • NET SITE AREA) _1932 • 34D68 0,0567 6% K NUMBER OF STORIES I HEIGHT SALES BUILDING 15'-0" CAR WASH CANOPY BUILDING PAD ELEVATION ±200,66 CURB ELEVATION ±200,5 (CURB NEAREST BUILDING) I NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES PROJECTED _1 (EMPLOYEE RATIO/1000 SO.FT.) PARKING sJ REQUIRED 7 PROVIDED (TOTAL) — 7 HANDICAPPED _I__ HOURS OF OPERATION 24 HOURS EXISTING USE SERVICE STATION PROPOSED USE SERVICE STATION/MINI-MART ZONING DESIGNATION PLANNED DISTRICT GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION C-G PAVING AREA 20.771 SOFT. 61 X OF TOTAL H LANDSCAPE AREA 8.637 SOFT. _25 % OF TOTAL LEGEND (N) . . . . . . . . . NEW (E) . EXISTING (TYP) TYPICAL ❑ . . . . . . . . .EXISTING TO REMAIN . . . . . . . .NEW L..J . EXISTING TO BE REMOVED F FF 00.00' FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION APPROVED BUILDING OUTLINE PER S.A.C. #17-U-90 eG E i i D , 1 7/21/931 REVISED BUILDING & CANOPY R.J.P. MARK DATE F&VIB10N8 MIAL SITE PLAN 9-5700 c t1010 DE ANZA BLVD. CUPERTINO, CA. Chevron Northwest Region e ® ROBERT H. LEE & A880CIATE8INC. ' ARCHFIIN URE ENO MERNO B•NNV0Il*AIPIT'AL DEM09113 1137 NORTH McDOMfLL BOULEVARD PETALUMA CA. 94954 (707) 765-1660 JDHN W. JDHNSON, ARCHITECT JAMES H. RAY, CIVIL ENGINEER RML REVIEW NNTLA - DATE DATE: 7/21/93 PRELIMINARY PLANNING Z DR. BY: 4 ko STEEL BID ./ ' BLDG PERMIT APPR.: rOI1p A GENERAL BID PERMIT REVS RHL 0 $937.10 CONSTRUCTION SHEET Do not use drawing for construction unless Inllloled 17 18 19 20 21 r , i A ra L K J H C F E C w w a C N a In In in N rn IM 01 ZI , N n 53 A O z 0 Z Q Of a 41 4m 4n rs 4n IQ 20 aN ■■ r�I1rr11Arrrr 1 A �y�„ �f A�If�AA II .AAiiIMAA„IIAAAAIiAAA,IIIr�AAIII AAArIIf AAA IIl rAAA IIIrAhrIIAAAIIIrAAA III AAAr III AAhIIrAAA III AAArIII AAA IIIrAAA III rAArIII AAA rIII AAUAIArtIAArII1 AAIIAAll�IIAlrII1 AAIIrAAIIrArIIAAIIrAAIIrAlII�AAIIAAAl>IIrrA11IIAA1ANIArIIAArIIAAIIrAriIrArIIAAIIAAArIIrAArIIAAAIIrAAAIIArA.IIAAA.IIrAAAIIrAAr IIAAIIIAAlAIIAArIIAAIIrAAAIIMArIIAAIIrAAII■ArIIAArIIAAIIAArIIAMrIIAAII rAIMAIArIOr►,II rAAIIrArIIAAIIrAA1IAArIIAAIf�AAIl�IrIIAArIIAAIIAArIIAArIIAAIIrAAIIAArIIAAIIrAAIIAArEIAAIIrAIIrArIIAAIIrAIIrArIIAAAIIrAAIIAA■NIAIIAAII■AAIIrAAIIrArIIAAIIrAAIIrArIIAAIIrAAIIAArIIrA IIrAAIIrA rIIAA IIrAAIIrA IIAAIIAAIIAAIIAAIIAAIIAAIIMAIIAAIIAAIIAAIIAAIIAAII�I1�1 ` AIAIAIAIAI'IA• III AtAlAI'll 4IAIUAAAIMINIAIAIAIAlA1 M, 4 I*�lIII loll !jIllillFavo,�r- A1A BLUE ALIGN WITH BOTTOM FASCIA CAP pood Ave-1 FASCIA OF "Food Mort" LETTERS LIGHT GREY OFF-WHITE O WHITE STRIPE RED BAND onl • o OVER DOORS & WINDOWS IQ Not inQsv / WWDOW FRAME & DOOR - --,t FRAME - DARK GREY WALL, STUCCO TEXTURE (UPPER) OFF-WHITE /r /r I iC1 I SALES/CARWASH BOIL mQ ELEVATION 1/40■1'-0 1 CADMASTR\BLDGS\CH\SALES\RM2\RM2R%E02 ■ 52'- 3" elL 101 WHITE LETTERS ON - / \ ;• ; : \ BLUE PANEL ,I F/I ■ IQ] i 0 I D ® N 11 14L N • M. nti.-..t .. - .. .. . -. mfrymm4 -.. .. .'.tea=°"�Z'MSRW.�'+�RY .t.4 +v.. `� .;_ x...:::M,K.wv a ..:sSffs'. ': vv Y.r .- �.a+`S2'vs:aX•�-�:�vsvls'sle�. . w. .. «x «: -rza-»i.•�,V'.x ... w. e . ..•. .« a. :.. �...ave:.¢x .. 1 I I 11 21 m I 31 1 41 1 'El I�TBI ® I 11 >II 3 4 6 8 B 9 1 11 12 13 i� 16 SIDE ELEVATION D .r 4M 1 T7 1A u �r �1 213 REVISED BUILDING & CANOPY ATE I F+IEVIS ON9 UnAL SALES/CARWASH BUILDING ELEVATIONS 9-5700 11010 DE ANZA CUPEMM, CA. Chevron Northwest Region ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. AACWTBWILIFE 931' IhMJO BNVNO/•MMINTTAL rOWN10lS 1137 NORM M[DOWELL BOULEVARD PETALUMA CA. 94954 (707) 765-1660 JOHN W. JOHNSON, ARCHITECT JAMES H. RAY, CIVIL ENGINEER RFL FlEVlew RJITIAL DATE DATE: 7 20 PRELIMINARY PLANNING DR. BY: 6,00 STEEL DID BLDG PERMIT APPR.: fLjr GENERAL DID RHL / 8937.10 PERMIT REVS CONSTRUCTION I HEET Do not use dra*M �i for construction L unless Inilloisd tIa en 71 • 4 i 4 r' •� 3 .ss 20 R P N M U C V) a C N N rl 0 n 0 rn B t 2 3 4 8 1D 7 8 s lu n Tz MODIFII W/ SP FASCIA LIGHT WHITE FASCIA BLUE CANOPY FRONT ELEVATION K1 CANOPY ELEVATIONS LETTERS - BLACK HALLMARK BACKGROUND - WHITE �---- PERIMETER BACKGROUND 1'-4" B'-5 1/2" - DK. GREY BLUE TRANSLUCENT STRIPE 1 1/2n./F7 RED TRANSLUCENT STRIPE 4'- TRANSLUCENT GRAPHICS, TYP - WHITE LIGHTED PRICE SIGN, TRANSLUCENT BACK- 0 gal GROUND, TYP - BLUE Co � \ ■. .�®� SIGN CABINET - DK. GREY N d ®� TRANSLUCENT RULE LINE I - RED co ADDITIONAL PROFIT CENTER SIGN BACKGROUND, TYP .- - DK. GREY BASE & COLUMN COVERING =n=111-� WITH LPS & APC SIGN FINISH GRADE u INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED "Chevron" WORDMARK WHITE WITH BLUE RETURNS (13.6 SQ.FT.) (TYP. OF 2) FASCIA OFF-WHITE INTERNALLY LOGO 4.3 SC UPPER COLD DARK GREY INTERNALLY 'SPANNER' B WITH LOGO (TYP. OF 6) INFORMATION PANEL BLUE TRASH RECE FUEL DISPEN P.O.S. FRAMI (3.4 SQ.FT.) %1Ir, yr v/ L. , Al C-45 HALLMARK MONUMENT SIGN 14 15 19 t7 10 ■ v Y V V , IF � f I REY I ITE IL) 1 0 1 /21/931 REVISED BUILDING & CANOPY I R.J.P. eXI DAW I IEVSKM HT1AL CANOPY AND MONUMENT SIGN ELEVATIONS 9-5700 =0 DE ANZA BLVD. CUPER IOU, CA. Chevron Northwest Region ®ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. AFICHITECTUIPIE 840WEEP0 0 ENvrK*&AamTAL GIIVICN 1137 NORTH McDOWELI BOULEVARD PETALUMA CA. 96954 (7D7) 765-1660 JOHN W. JOHNSON, ARCHITECT JAMIES H. RAY, CIVIL ENGINEER R L FIEVN!W MXTIAL DATE DATE: 7/21/93 PRELI.INARY PLANNING DR. BY: STEEL BID BLDG PERMIT APPR.:� GENERAL BID RHL 1 8937.10 PERMIT REPS SHEET CONSTRUCTION Do not use drawing for construction 01e68 Initialed 10 20 21 I J i 7 r 9 4 1 2 0 ' 2 C 3 4 71 Ll FA 8 0 FA 11 17 0 i I o 0 o c o • I op � i • so- (N) 10' x 10' TRASH ENCLOSURE I 0 (N) (3) 12,000 GAL. \ \ \ 1 \ 1 FUEL STORAGE \ \ \ 1 \ \ OTANKS 1 \Aft\ ` I • (N) 38 x 85 CANOPY \ 1 I wo / _ — — SEE SHEET 3 (N) RM-2 SALES BUILDING (1,306 SQ.FT. & i CARWASH (1150 SO.FT.) (HT. 15'-0") SEE SHEET 2 8 I T�Irvi � mwm�Ynow wom Y � omm-mom •`amili Wool W I I I I I I i I I 1 a 14 1a i APPROVED 20'-9"x 46'-8" SALES BUILDING do 35' x 108' CANOPY oo, am Ito N 00'00'W 9310' 11 SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE ROAD DE ANZA BLVD, vol low t/72.11 MI N � I i'� M DI b wwi, 0 14 0 5 10 20 30 40 7=7%=7 ' ' ' ' ' a 7 8 0 10 tt 12 10 14 to �s ... .. — �81 ' 1 I 1) I 21 I 31 I 41 I CI I I 11 21 3 4 5 8 8 9 1 11 12 13 14. 15 e 1 2 10 3 4 I 6 I 7 8 , - r I I R P N i 0 F E 0 ZI J f` M ro A O Z U Z Q C3 1 G 2 3 4 5 SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE ROAD DE ANZA BLVD. W 7 t1 12 13 14 15 16 17 F) 2 SF) 10 SF) 61 SF.) 0 5 10 20 30 40 7=7%M:7 g- I 10 I 11 12 13 14 1 I 1 it I 2I 1131 I Ip 41 I CI 111 ® 1 11 >b 3 4 6 6 91 1 11 '121 13 141 15 Q Q W F_ W 2 0 or 15 18 J ifi 21 PLANT LEGEND CA0MA51H\GE71\0251 TCIW1 \0295LUIG SYMBOL SILL OTY�m47HI BOTANICAL NAME COMMON ND R TREES T-i 48" BOX 1 40' CEORUS DEODARA DEODAR CEDAR T-2 36" BOX _ 4 20' PRUNUS _. 'KRAUIER VESUVIUS' PURPLE LEAF PLUM T-3 36" BOX 3 40' OUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK COAST P T-4 J6" 110, 4 40' SEQUOIA SEMPERVIRENS REDWOOD T-5 3r, BOX J ?0' ARBUTUS UNEDO STRAWBERRY SHRUBS S-1 5 GAL 2 5' ALYOGYNE HUEGELII BLUE HIBISCUS S-2 5 GAL 9 4' ARCTOSTAPHYLOS D 'HOWARD McMINN McMINN' MANZANITA N 5-3 5 GAL 10 6' CEANOTHUS 'FROSTY BLUE' FROSTY BLUE CALIFORNIA LILAC S-4 1 GAL 83 2'6" ESCALLONIA 'NEWPORT DWARF' DWARF ESCALLONIA S-5 5 GAL, 13 4' ESCALLONIA 'FRADESI' ESCALLONIA S-6 I GAL 47 2' HEMERCALLIS 'HYBRID' RED DAY LILY S-8 1 GAL. 91 4' NANDINA DOMESTICA HEAVENLY M HARBOR DWARF' BAMBOO V14ES V-1 1 GAL, 2 N/A EUONYMUS F. 'RADICANS' COMMON WINTER CREEPER CROUnDCOVERS CC-1 1 GAL 1,169 4 • 12" ARCTOSTAPHYLOS U 'PT. BEARBERRY 18" O C. REYES' - L GC-2 FLATS 193 SF 0 6 VIOLA LABRADORICA VIOLET B" O.C. GC-3 1 GAL 903 SF • I2" PETUNIA 'HYBRIDA' RED PETUNIA 12" 0 C. AS ANNUAL COLOR CHANGE SEASONALLY NOTES. 1, SEE SHEET L-3 FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS AND SHEET L-4 FOR SPECIFICATIONS K MARKI DATE I f1EVISKM I IFiT1AL LANDSCAPE PLAN 9-5700 V010 DE ANZA BLVD. CUPERTINO, CA. Chevron J (ice F 1�7 v Northwest Region e ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENON@ERINo ENVIR0MdENTAL.I3ERVICEE 1137 NCO TH MCDOWFLL BOULEVARD PETALUMA CA. 94954 (707) 765-1660 JOHN W JOHNSCM, ARCHITECT JAMES H RAY, CML ENGINEER RHL REVIEW RJTTIAL 0AT1E DATE: 02NOV93 PRELIMINARY PLANNING, DR BY. STEEL BID BLDG PERMIt APPR A GENERAL BID RHL 0 8937.10 PERMIT REVS CONSIRUC IICN SHEET Do not use drawing L— j for construction I unless Initialed 16 17 18 19 20 k 21 IR AV i PRE -FINISHED COLOR: BLUE — — WHITE STRIPE --- LIGHT GREY -� UPPER PORTION OF COLUMN, DARK GREY FASCIA PANELS INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED COLOR: OFF-WHITE MODE OF SERVICE SIGN WHITE BACKGROUND WITH Self OFF-WHITE W/RED OPAQUE DARK GREY 6" TAPE FILM OVERLAY LETTERING 10"x10" STL. COL. (TYP) COLOR: DARK GREY GUARD POST WITH REFLECTIVE TAPE DARK GREY GREY/TAPE FILM — LONG FASCIAS BLUE (NO FASCIA SEAMS IN LETTERING AREA TYP) OFF-WHITE WITH RED _-- TAPE FILM OVERLAY - OFF -WHITE LIGHT GREY DARK GREY EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED STEEL PANEL FASCIA COLOR: BLUE C-20 PLACARD MOUNTED INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED HALLMARK --� 24hr. 0 ELEVAT ION I� SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" PRE -FINISHED SMOOTH STEEL PANEL FASCIA COLOR: OFF-WHITE UPPER PORTION OF COLUMN DARK GREY WHITE TRANSLUCENT I if / i COLUMN WRAP, WHITE ELEVATION B SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" ELEVATION C SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" E F ( H I J I K DIMENSIONAL ILLUMINATED LETTERS) NEON, WHITE ACRYLIC FACE WITH BLUE RETURNS --7 PRE -FINISHED PANELS COLOR: DARK GREY WALL PANELS COLOR: LIGHT GREY SIGN CABINET, GREY OOOf DART FC MARKETER KEY PLAN arWash FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" ENTRANCE ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" GREY/WHITE TAPE FILM LONG FASCIA BLUE OFF-WHITE LIGHT GREY DARK GREY OFF-WHITE OFF-WHITE LIGHT GREY DARK GREY OVERHEAD DOOR. ALUMINUM FACE OFF-WHITE OFF-WHITE LIGHT GREY DARK GREY TAPE FILM I BLUE DARK GREY ELEVATION "TE-2" SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 12 13 4 S 6 ELEVATION D EXIT ELEVATION 7 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" SCALE: 3/16" CANOPY/ISLAND MARKETER ELEVATIONS CAR WASH ELEVATIONS m 3 REFERENCE bRAWINGS REVISIONS AS NOTED BUILDING ELEVATIONS m SCALE Chevron DATE 2/08/89 OR GWB CK I I .(` n, Inc.ERVICE STATION 9-5700 Chevron U.S.A. DE ANZA BLVD 8 HOMESTEAD RD N DR.APPR._ENG. CUPERTINO, CA 0 OPR'G. DEPT. APPROVED UMarketing Operations San Ramon SS u N S fs 0.9324981SN- I �roTK� o. 9-5700 X r�T�"j'��`r-('r'('r�'�'j'�'j�l f I I 11 I 21 I 31 1 41 I CI I 91 I itj21 3 4 6 8 t 11 12 13 1t 16 ' µ in