U-1989-31bASAC 31-U-89
RESOLUIUON NO. 1515
OF 'DIE ARCiMWIURAL AND SITE APPROVAL OCKIITPEE
OF THE CITY OF CUPOU-INO APPROVAL OF A 4,835 SQ. FT.
ADDITION, AN MMRIOR/INPEI2IOR REMODEL, AND LANDSCAPE
PLAN TO AN EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING LOCATED ALONG
SPEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
APPLICANT: Jon J. Rayden
PROPERTY OWNER: West Valley CmPanies, Inc.
APPLICAUr'S ADDRESS: 10121 Miller Avenue, Suite 202
PR3= LOCATION: 19400 Stevens Creek Boulevard
FINDINGS:
The Architectural and Site Approval committee finds as follows with regard
to this application:
1) The Landscape Plan does not conform to the Conceptual Plan for Stevens
Creek Boulevard.
2) The proposed building and lighting materials are incompatible with the
surrounding structures and with the ongoing theme (traditional) of
Stevens Creek Boulevard.
3) The remodeling and renovations will upgrade the property value.
CONDITIONS:
1-8) Standard Architectural and Site Approval Committee conditions to the
extent that they do not conflict with the special conditions listed
herein. In the event of conflict, the specific conditions listed
herein shall prevail.
9) This approval is based on Sheet A-0, A-1, A-2, A-3, A-4, A-5, A-6,
L1, and L2 dated December 27, 1989 of Application 31-U-89, except as
may be amended by conditions enumerated herein.
lo) The Landscaping Plan must be amended to conform to the Conceptual
Plan for Stevens Creek Boulevard. This would include amending the
proposed tree species as per the required species in the Oonceptual
Plan. In addition, the trees should be laid out in a fashion that is
not diiform. The use of drought tolerant species should be used.
The landscaped area on the northeast portion of the parcel should be
mounded to hinder views of parked vehicles from Stevens Creek
Boulevard. The sidewalk should be setback, (10 ft. of parkway along
Stevens Creek Boulevard and behind that a 5 ft. sidewalk). The
sidewalk transition should be shown to existing adjacent monolithic
sidewalks on all plans.
Resolution No. 1515 (31-U-89) January 22, 1990
Page -2-
11) The proposed lighting fixtures should be amended to a style
oaupatible with the building materials. The color of the standard
should be more compatible with surroundings, preferably beige,
black, brown, a nonreflective color or material. The use of high
pressure sodium is discouraged because of the change in colors that
it creates.
12) All signs shown on the plan are not approved. A proposed sign
program must be developed and brought before the Committee for
review and approval.
13) The proposed building materials and colors should be amended for a
more traditional and compatible material. The use of stucco, brick
or other similar materials are reconmmen9ed. The colors of these
materials should also be more compatible. The use of earth tone
colors and nonreflective materials should be used.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of January, 1990 at a regular meeting of
the Architectural and Site Approval Committee of the City of Cupertino,
State of California, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: MEMBERS: Jackson, Lim, Newton, and Chairman Gong
NAYS: MEMBERS: Hoxsie
ABSTAIN: MEMBERS:
ABSENT: MEMBERS:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
Is/ Michele Bjurman /sl Wayne Gong
Michele Bjurman Wayne Gong, Chairman
Planner I Archit. and Site Apprvl. Comm.
asac\rso31u89
ASAC 31-U-89
RESOLUrICN NO. 1518
OF TIfE AInUTECLURAL AND SITE APPROVAL OCtWTTEE
OF THE CTTY OF CSJPEiiT11J0 APPROVING OF 1,804 SQ. FT.
ADDrrICN, AND E7CrE OR/INTERIOR REMODEL, AND LANDSCAPING
PLAN TO AN EXISTING 19,500 SQ. FT. OFFICE BUILDING
APPLICANT: Jan Rayden
PROPERTY OWNER: West Valley Ccupanies, Inc.
APPLICANTIS ADORES.: 10121 Miller Avenue, Ste. 202
PR37fX:T LOCATION: 19400 Stevens Creek Boulevard
FINDINGS:
The Architectural and Site Approval Committee finds as follows with regard to
this application:
1) The remodeling and renovations will upgrade the property value.
2) The proposed building materials are crnpatible with the surrounding
structures.
3) The proposed landscaping plan is in conformance with the Stevens Creek
Conceptual Plan.
CONDITIONS:
1-8) Standard Architectural and Site Approval Counittee conditions to the
extent that they do not conflict with the special conditions listed
herein. In the event of conflict, the specific conditions listed herein
shall prevail.
9) This approval is based upon Sheet A-0, A-1, A-2, A-3, A-4, A-5, A-6, Lr-1,
and L-2 dated January 31, 1990 of Application ASAC 31-U-89, except as may
be amended by conditions enumerated herein.
10) All signs shown on the plan are not approved. A proposed sign program with
detailed plans must be developed and brought before the Architectural and
Site Approval Committee for review and approval.
11) The proposed parking lot fixture style is not caipatible with the
adjoining properties existing fixtures. The Applicant shall work with
Staff in applying a more compatible fixture. If an amicable fixture
cannot be agreed upon, the proposed fixture style is agreeable.
PASSED AND ADOPPED this 12th day of February, 1990 at a regular meeting of the
Architectural and Site Approval CkYmuittee of the City of Cupertino, State of
California, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: MEMBERS: Hoxsie, Lim, Newton, Chairman Gong
NAYS: MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: MEMBERS: None
AEISENr: MEMBERS: Jackson
ATTEST: APPROVED:
/s/ Michele Bjurman /s/ Wayne Garw
Michele Bjurman Wayne Gong, Chairman
Planner I Archit. and Site Apprvl. Cohan.
asac\3lu89 y
Iy.�i :GAL „t,• ._..._ _-_.. .....�._.� �..._.�.
([ 55 t II������ ( P 5Rp OtCEJ I�EfUq C NET
A• ISISII'L'LL',AIUPROFEISIpNAl20FF[CE CEMIEA•SITIl7N FLOUR AREAP�OOIi60N AID ARCNITECtURAL FACELIFT
r R_ LOT SIZE - 1.2I ACRES (51.10 SO FT)
1 LOT COYERACE (EXISTING 6 ADDITION)
BUILDING FOOTPRINT _ 9,081 SO FTO IS,
ASPHALT CONCRETE PAYING - 26.705 SO FT (SOX)
LANDSCAPE. WALK. G.E.. ETC. _ ;$,rlS $O FT (DIS)
York 3.IA3 SO FT (ROOT)
C. FLOOR AREA
EXISTING PROPOSED
IST FLOOR 7.733 50 FT 1,791 SO FT
2NO FLOOR
51H-TOTAL .1.3E5 SO FT INS00S0 FT
---------------
F.A.R. 13.385153.143 - 27X 19.500153.143 • 37%
0. OR -SITE PARNINC
SS REQUIRED PROPOSED
FD'"QSn fLOFFLRS 20.31eRa5 . 71 ),
SIZE OF STALLS 67L STD sr STO (YJV; I7 COPACt (Iry
731 COPACt
DATA
E. TRAFFIC INTENSITY PERFORM a STANDARD
FROM NAP PREPARED 01 CITY
TRIPS ALLOCATED: 1.22 AC-3 I to ICSO TRIP? '
TRIPS GENERATE(•: IR.S00 I 1 TRIP11.000 SO FT . 1y,50 TRIPS
OW N E R : west: valley 10121 MIUV Menus
Companies. Ine, CA 910I
p Cupv(406 CA OSOIA
1<oe1 <AavSaD
LOCA TION MAP
77
44
;}`���� •• •••S11 ilIH a'lil •IK111 L11 ,r �/
�''. "; "IFS .5,�''�' v'. � .gyp•
ii �."7r'"il r■ fr. 1M,� APTA 44 r
wj
.J.
1'. lyu'•0
j,_ DRAWING INDEX
SHEET 1
A-0
TITLE SHEET
SH= 2
A-1
SIT£ PLANS (EXIS nA3 B NE31)
SHM 3
A-2
SITE B BUILDING SECPIOCS
SHEET 4
A-3
1ST FLOOR PLANS (EXISTING i NEW)
SHEET 5
A-4
2tD FLCOR PLANS (MCIS LNG i NEW)
SHECT 6
A-5
BU== ELMTICNS
SHEET 7
A-6
BUILDING ELEVATICtS
SHEET B
A-7
PEPSEPELTSVF
SHEET 9
L-1
PIANIING PLAN
CONSULTANTS
ARCHITECT) STEVE YANG 8 ASSOCIATES .-ISO NORTH FIRST STR
SAN JOKE. CA III IR
CIVIL ENGINEER:
SOIL ENGINEER:
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
STRUCTURAL ENGINEER.-
MECHANICAL ENGINEER:
ELECTRICAL ENGINEER:
USE PERMIT 12.17.Iyyy
ft— Yang .
• associates -
..[flNa. W,..
W yA
Ilw,r,u, Nw N..I
wp M.Iw am
S T E V E N S C R E E K B L V D.
1 �A� v -•-II I \� .— .1`. iJ'vJI f'^�.. M•�Y bti..+•LMSD y .
13
GY. •/�L" M 1 -rw�� ».w �1 �il..L".ti iy 1
._..i:Z
p ID w ' !vriv�an 'L..w.n�+ nf....xT 1�4 _9� .•L
T�A ``4•' T------ ---i' ..ran
I �
ziEX. BLDG.� !
' ? 6 EXISTINGFF
Jj
VI 12-ST04T1
PARCEL 1 (1.07 AC'S) rr+�t•w ;' ; �• - -� /1 -v.•rb •s /
I �• z !
r T
�� .u.I.wt.L fw'P*' _t.e.i..a ems. u"••ww
► �` p � _ ie p• o^Ivt _+s'"�.� •)'?..K• YY•+i � ; , � � 7 3 w...r !c.!� � i.
1 _.. ._ GI PHtif i3'•Y l
LL f UB C L 1.22 AC'SF AR
T I v'"0'T"7
! L I L --T -
—ar1'Paar+•r+.eb �/ ✓iPa;wwe ...u1J �
PARCEL 2 (1.25 AC-S) -tas ale..+. e�...J J� i '+�••�"�'
1,
T T
�I �' a.+L .� A ®,,.Imp o s w ®•11 � d
\n...�+®o s mN+•mt �+f ®.ram v rmnur t.
+ � ,o "m.s vmily biYm.O un•m .• ro o s Hams "omr Ia• � 4 �v+:S••+} •b _ `
la•m . u• wfw .Ie norwoslr ra m m. L,s. a mua.m
J m6o� v m�n� mv>flns rm .vu a w®m n.wc
O s �I ae tso.na Y 2 S-e .
L 111�CY�laVp.G� V ■It■ LIaaT It•
S�M;Tlrb :e{L!N �®..as m®r1'meo'�ioaiL�ml•bd •T �' � +IM u«!N.'s tsl —
� ` ,"oma s w"•.�.�um s.�iai s � �� � � L Q �+ m. a - u•� I�rm r.l
Im,f IIII ■ - I•� Iboam R.1 aIa Ila
i Ll� �. IeOR MR
tp .Jlppli�w+•�[lK w+ _ 7M "+'+�s.L I _
EXISTING SITE PLAN NEW SITE PLAN 20*
itr
slavb yang
i A's oclat es
I•"In
Iu!
a..w.. M
�•+fl•'is +r
Or1� 6Y
ar sY
Cr• 12't-J �I
iww
J•I
A�
A-1
9
r
SfWiNS ckEaK
- pwn, — � pcapeeYY
_. uua op -
� 1 �
SECTION 'B-B'
1"-30'-0
4fgt1;N6 cmic Fez' Aso PRwTY
LIN> OF tdµ� T '
Psojllof *IYS
etTtilluq ibcGt FpwKJNlst f� NiAKJtST HaLLSY
foot
1 Z7o1 O___
�vr
}NAG. I
0 I
4 1 T
_. .SECTION .'A -A'
1'=30'-0
G1ciE�1�S
A
�--� B
STEVSN3 AHtK ■LVD
aT0 aT v
OlFW
dITE
IAllawa OVCI
1-1 KWa
A.CNw000 CT A�
yT B
KEY MAP
N.T.S. ---
to a
fa w
h ]C
Wo" yang
8 asaoe�awas
i
iue:us
na �rw w.w
w
w� nin
�r ry
I•'�I.9i Y
Dw� i..-
orr s Y
o.r 12,27,Eq
eel.
xs
ee.r
A-2
m
9
i
.EX. 1ST . FLR PLAN
(7.733 SO FT)
1 i
I
I I
I I
�.
1 I
CZ I
I
W,l I I
"' I ^ hMwf MM•
cw-
( r sU1TU W
EXISTING
o
KAI
Q I rw TNY..AN Cx
r i SUITH W. Q it
1
I I' tipr,i'2
- ADDITION - I'"'"'I
(INCLUDING FRONT LOBBY)
(2,038 30 FT) -.^wrb' _-•
tt1T1�Y
•i1U0 T6WJ.ITS 4 a,.. Q L
$UIT£'8'-4.'�'Y/- KiT, dl
tAMSA C AREA" "I"
-COMMON Ac" - "I. SF C 14 A
—�NEW_1_ST FLR ._PLAN __ aD
is-3
(9,791 SO FT)
a
1
b
Q 4 0 0- v
I I I
I �
I I I
I '
I I /YIi /uf /•�. I
Oj IGB 6 I --- __i•�i dr (or -or IF oNC Tw4ANT)
" I --� SUITE 'O•
STAIit'7' 0
9 p
EXISTING, s
C 1 _
rr-ORRIDO R.LObbY (^�°� Q i- - - -- ----�
'�' ,I I �-Of�1T- IFoNc Tg1ANT i r.
—i ��----
e toabY o
OFFIC49 I -----_ f,
-iW C'1 4'A�A�+u.fC71 I
User ota.of•'�)
Om C-r- T I
t:
❑cN
I SUITE 'C"". n_
10 Ni! .a
MONK"
- I
p ADDITION-1
EX. 2ND FLR PLAN (INCLUDING
�FT)LOBY)
37
.li
1/8'=1'-0 _ (7,652 SO FT)' -
- _,opiwN 2. COA76-rwAN•))
apT1oN 3.( -rk,= •1p.V"T`s)
.
.LFJk1Ej�DLE_ f{R!A _. ATeG SF US J.)
5urrr f f
LEA*A&Lr- ALMA ..__
_bfF O SF ::
(.07%)
:COMMON / A 1,4e1 5F Vz f)
coy MOM._AIMA
(Ia f")
CIooJ)
-rorAL�
9.7eN Sp
Cloo,C)
—NEW _.2ND_F_LFLP_LAN_
...__
— D
1/8"=11-0
(9,709 SO F)
TOTALTOTAL TWO FLRS - 197900 SO FT
_FLRS • 16,385 SO FT ..__ .-.. _.- e.... _,..._ _. _ ., .z _ .� ,. _s ,. ... . _ �
v,._._ _ - _
- --- -- -�•"'1'..:.�
l0 7
_ - - ... ,.
.1"4 yAn9
alssac;.t..
NiMl..lu,.
M"
11>Q r.i, M Mail
ii.Ire 4 Mtq
w►77slau
I'�1•go w
Drww p �
GTiri 9Y
7YY K s'� 69
A-4
of
9
I
� IyRr
'L'I���li ��71� _ �lY� /11� �• �y�yt
l of Ellmm I
1
-:WEST -
ENTRANCE KIOSK
-- EAST -
( MAIN ENTRANCE )
11MpW4 M1�NY Mawn1
IAc1uN Ysw1
112' SEALANT JTJ
BANDS (LIGHT BLUE COLOR)
EXT. WALL INSUL. A FIN. SYSTEM
(SANDBLAST FIN./
STONE MOST, GRANITE COLOR)
FIXED GL., BUTT JT. (LIGHT GREEN)
stew Yang
6wassactatel,
4s1Y „
aYl+ IW,
IIy, nY-ly., ,Ir.,1
Y.Y` YI
WYi4iY]
N..wvr e,
a....l eY
CAYs S Y
ar. 12s71�t
!or
Jr
>0..1
A-5
a
9
r
.=- rpr
FLF
SOUTH
- NORTH -
(VIEW FROM STEVENS CREEK BLVD.)
SEE MATERIAL NOTES ON A-5
atsrs yang
& assoclatss
uYJ-b W/N
.luwb
u.lybslu��
wW
cd
U g'
;>
I
a
ob.� sY
Owa S Y
Dr 12?7,&q
fetl�
JON.
w
A-6
a
9
PLANT LEGEND
KbY
6df�'^'�u+- 4 Cor-��wu�l FJn�nt
t1iY
Stu
FEws�s
i I
vGlJrw P�•A�Ro++ - 1+.0'j><•u•pJ WILu.W
15Yi
-Ti >'++�+o
T'L
w.-yTe AJV A.Agt n - Mayiewl 1XIM
T-3
aK7oC 4^P. WAbPt'7w - Irr-w FM r-
15s
IJ)•Ttir.l,.
T'+
T(µ G. IFL-G•,rILL'—(Z6DbPtC PL'+i
I%
�iiy-�
�ILLJI� �i
31
A<;Z �+— oalcapA.y - UL-Y-os. Na.e
1 G
st
ft
Pb!-Wda-aL-Afti•..: INS
IU
i1
"&A, otr� IWH.TW-Gud-WJZ OL
5a
54
?tT�vu�+ti+ ;•'Vc�l:e+p' - Var+eG,TW_1I A.
F6
5'3
P-A#%al,d- I•I'cu++� _ INps KpJt">•D.w!
5G.
,a,
I
xY"obw^ G. CGMr�.�► -
17
0u�� M.J.' '6mj BF..nyr - tOXaav
G.tq,e.D (jNCl�S
G
�S+tiTt!�J'•Iwt P.LW DlA•Q�••7 - id 6. IGE N+T
-
Ra
p•G.4
6Z
'wez^ N• ktNNll - I�,nrM.ie IvY
-
n
rvGc.
(IS
—laocttCLOSiIlt.pw ,fr w:InJgCtS_.ra�pt JAeAAING
—
16
d'
ID101c.
y(
� COL04
gb.t
NOTES
t ft-L ayGG Vr-ClPCT2m1b, il-
j. l-
G..atur% a...T KEY
;N�IC 1�S Plo r au-rTr
a. xc L.w-I s+_.. v�ow.T Tessa-T ws�eN 9oz o�y�aL'
4, 6A IJO ea./eA 'D 'b. M,-jr_o IN AIA. '_`NJV9 AA % W .�
r� ;v'MG 6�T wT CF anlY �15LI C�YwILIGS e&Twee.+ThS FL J AUO AC11-
4ITe Urolncwn Ttr_ L.-c-V PE AA",Tscr mq.u- to .er+Nlrr".1
1►.I tin e.pl.p7d.Y .
.tr,E SIT.t-1.. tF_ :LawTEo LJRH .W wravAr..L SYZ"=7.1 251i.A0
�}( "lfg LwD'1r�5 .1r1LM ITGL'r.
M G 70
Stevens Creek Blvd
WE
PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN
V
step. yau�
d nsacla; Me
p�.nn.nq
..Mn
+w
b� tit ipaf
tp.M..t Ih
Oep.w a —
Met
Dr It M. M
xt
sty:
L'1
a
9
PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS
i:rrtr�T:iir: »i w
wlu r II/= u
qit r •, r,•,1.
r l.mu.. a «!•Ir«.
IS+�•-rt
Y
]Tr!�Q � IA41ICI.}—yj�bl
A. RFvinlrw Cf
Kt CYN>14 I'h• —
My.C.N IYt• GEL?
'j!a Mi Navcs
rlNlfdl 6K�CG
e•.. N RL.l.1
t
�_ . .. — Zl.c sane RYD sT"x.
rT Fsj d
`
4 0.L M�YI MNVI
Ir.
IIQI�
L
I
�;
[aLKJ'IW iSLF.
L (4.4L PT ST1"S $IW.L. F',G 1611 Ci."LK CcMIMIJ.
lJ&ws AT SrIJGES $FWJ. L7E ad 6"m ccmm&4
TREE PLANTING & STAKING I 2 REDWOOD HEADER
1
PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS & DETAILS
Move ydng.
iaswd al
1.
MY»
!lM MMbY
wryY
Y►nYl{.�
J
EL;2
Cites of CNperti"o
101W lour Avenue P.O. Box 500
Cipei lino, CA 95014-3255 Cuperllno, CA 9501"500
Telephone: (4W) 252-4505
FAX: (400) 252.0753
DEPARTMENT OF 111[ CITY CLERK
Match 8, 1990
Jon Rayden
West Valley Companies, Inc.
10121 Miller Avenue, Suite 202
Cupertino, CA 95014
CITY COUNCIL ACTION - APPLICATION:3lzU-89 -°USE PEMM TO OONVERT AN
EM%71NG 15,400 SQ. FT. SAVINGS AND IDOAN BUILDING TO A 19,500 SQ. Fr.
OFFICE CERIER NTIH RELATED SITE II•IPROMUNTS, AND AMENCL•TQ,IIr OF PREVIOUSLY
APPROVED TRIP -END ACCOUNTING - 350 FT. EAST OF STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD AND
MITER AVENUE
This will confirm the action by the City Council at their meeting of
February 21, 1990 at which your Application 31-U-89 was approved per the
following conditions:
CONDITIONS AENTNISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DI PAT7ITgTfI
1. STREET WIDENING
Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in
accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by
the City Engineer.
� r �• A I••rr D li
Garbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed
in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City
Engineer.
3. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION
Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the
city Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to
preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining
properties, and shall be no higher than the maxim= height permitted
by the zone in which the site is located.
4. FIRE HYDRANT
Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City.
5. TRAFFIC SIGNS
Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the
City.
Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall
be of a type approved by the City in accordance with ordinance 125 and
the Conceptual Zoning Plan for Stevens creek Boulevard.
7. GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in
accordance with Ordinance 125.
8. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
9. UNDEWROUND UTII.ITIFs
The developer shall conply with the requirements of the Underground
Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related ordinances and
regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with
affected utility providers for installation of underground utility _—
devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans for utility
underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval
of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer.
1 1�11��1/?1�7��! : dC 719u17�JY
The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with
the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not
limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park
dedication fees and fees for undergrounding of utilities. Said
agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits.
11. TRANSFORMERS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground
equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or
located underxground such that said equipment is not visible from
public street areas.
CONDITIONS ALMINl9MM BY THE OOD4+1LMY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
12. APPROVED QMBITS
The recO mnendation of approval is based on Exhibits A-1 through L-1
Consisting of 9 Sheets dated January 19, 1990, except as may be
amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution.
13. INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENTS
The applicant shall record an appropriate deed restriction and
Covenant running with the land subject to approval of the City
Attorney, for all parcels which share a common private drive or
private roadway with one or more other parcels. Said deed restriction
shall provide for necessary reciprocal ingress and egress easements to
and from the affected parcels. Said easements shall be recorded at
such time as interest in one or more of the affected parcels is
initially sold or transferred to another party.
14. TRIP CONSTRAINT
Land Use intensity shall be limited to an intensity that will not
generate more than sixteen (16) one way trips per acre during the peak
traffic hour. For purposes of ensuring compliance with the Traffic
Intensity Performance Standard, the following accounting of trips is
hereby incorporated into the project approval:
TRIPS GENERATED BY PROJECT:
19,500 (x) 1 Trip/1,000 sq. ft. = 19.5 Trips
TRIPS ALLOCATED To PROJECT SITE:
1.22 acres (x) 16 = 19.5 Trips
SURPLUS TRIPS: None
In the event that a development does not utilize the hill 16 trips per
acre allotted by the trip end performance standard, the owner of
record shall have the ability to retain, sell or transfer trips with
other property owners within the the Traffic Intensity Performance
Standard Area. All sales or transfers of trips shall be filed with
the Director of Community Development and the City Clerk. No sale or
transfer shall be considered finally consummated until a Use Permit
has been approved for the property to which the trips are to be
applied.
The developer shall record a covenant to describe the trip acre
constraint and the total number of trips allocated to the particular
development at the time of development approval. The covenant shall
contain appropriate wording to suggest that future purchasers of the
property consult the individual Use Permit file to obtain an updated
status report of the total number allocated to each particular
property.
15. PARKING
Parking shall be provided at a ratio of one space for every 285 sq.
ft. of gross floor area for office development.
16. PROTECT IDENTIFICATION SIGNS
The applicant shall submit a comprehensive detailed plan for informal
review by the Architectural and Site Approval Committee prior to
issuance of building permits.
17. STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SIDEWALK STANDAM2IJS
The installation of the sidewalk in conformance with the Stevens Creek
Conceptual Plan will require the recordation of pedestrian and public
utility easements, located 5 ft. back of the existing property line,
from property line to curb
leaving
of sidewalk area
completed in conjunction line.Said
the
development of the addition and renovation of said building.
17. STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD SIDEWAIiC STANDARD6 (Continued)
The applicant may defer Stevens Creek Boulevard Sidewalk Standard
improvements until any one of the following occur:
a. Adjoining properties east or west of the subject parcel modify or
upgrade their existing improvements to a significant degree, thus
including street frontage enhancements as well,
b. The City Council directs that all obligated properties proceed
with improvements following due notification and adequate time
for preparation of sites for construction activity.
18. MODIFICATION OF APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
In the event that the applicant or subsequent property owner shall
desire to make any minor changes, alterations or amerelment of the
approved development plan, a written request or revised development
plan shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development. If
the Director makes a finding that the changes are minor and do not
result in a material affect upon the appearance or function of the
project, said changes may be certified on the revised plan. If
approval of said changes is withheld, the applicant may appeal to the
Planning Commission.
If the Director finds that the requested charges are material, such
changes shall be referred to the Planning Commission for approval. If
the changes are denied by the Planning Commission, the applicant may
appeal to the city council as provided in city ordinance No. 652.
If said oranges are approved by the Planning Commission, an appeal may
be made to the city Council by any interested party. Further, any
Member of the city Council may request a hearing before the city
Council regarding said approved charges. Said request shall be made
within ten (10) days from the date of approval of said changes by the
Planning Commission.
Please review conditions carefully. If you have any questions regarding
the conditions of approval please contact the Department of cominty
Development staff members for clarification. Failure to incorporate
conditions into your plan set will result in delays at the plan checking
stage. If development conditions require tree preservations, do not clear
the site until required tree protection devices are installed.
The expiration date for the use permit is February 21, 1992 (Section 6.4
of Ordinance No. 652 as revised by Ordinance No. 1136).
Sincerely,
DOFDIM S, C KC
CITY CLERK
cc: Department of community Development -
Department of Public Works
Bill McBee Steve Yang & Associates
Cupertino Sanitary District 1150 N. 1st St., Ste. 140
20065 Stevens creek Boulevard San Jose, CA 95112
Cupertino, CA 95014
31-U-89
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION No. 4242
OF THE PLANNING OCH IISSION OF THE CITY OF GUPERTINO
REOCt4MFtIDING APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT TO CONVERT AN EXISTING
15,435 SQ. Fr. SAVINGS AND LOAN BUILDING TO A 19,500 SQ. FT.
OFFICE CENTER WITH RELATED SITE IMPR0VEM1VIS
SECTION I: FINDINGS
W10ZFAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an
application for a Use Permit, as described on Page 2 of this Resolution;
and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support
said application.; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the application meets the
following requirements:
a) That the use or uses are in conformance with the General Plan of
the City of Cupertino, and are not detrimental to existing uses
or to uses specifically permitted in the zone in which the
proposed use is to be located.
b) That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to
aeocarmnodate the proposed use.
c) That the proposed use will not generate a level of traffic over
and above that of the capacity of the existing street system.
d) That the proposed use is otherwise not detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals and general welfare of persons residing or
working in the neighborhood of such proposed uses, nor injurious
to property and improvements in the neighborhood.
NOW, T3MUTORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and
other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit is
hereby reeamTended for approval, subject to the conditions which are
enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified
in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record
concerning Application 31-U-89 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning
Commission Meeting of February 14, 1990, and are incorporated by reference
as though fully set forth herein.
L_
Resolution No. 4242 (31-U-89) February 14, 1990
Page -2-
swigON II: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Application No(s): 31-U-89 and 44-FA-89
Applicant: Jon Rayden
Property Owner: West Valley 0moanies. I
Location: 19400 Stevens Creek Boulevard, 350 ft. east of
Miller Avenue
Parcel Area: 1.22 Acres 53.143 sot. ft.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS AEMMSPEREO BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1. STREET WIDENING
Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided in
accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by
the City Engineer.
2. CURB AND GUTTER II4PROVEMINIS
Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed
in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City
Engineer.
3. SIREET ISGa TIM INSTALLATION
Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City
Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude
glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties,
and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in
which the site is located.
4. FIRE IiYDRANT
Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City.
5. TRAFFIC SIGNS
Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the
City.
6. STREET TREES
Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall
be of a type approved by the City in accordance with ordinance 125 and
the Conceptual Zoning Plan for Stevens Creek Boulevard.
7. GRADING
Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in
accordance with Ordinance 125.
Resolution No. 4242 (31-U-89) February 14, 1990
Page -3-
0. DRAINAGE
Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
9. UNDERMOUND UrILMES
Zhe developer shall fly with the requirements of the Underground
Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and
regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with
affected utility providers for installation of underground utility
devices. Zhe developer shall submit detailed plans for utility
underground provisions. said plans shall be subject to prior approval
of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer.
10. IMPROVEMIM 14Gf2EEMINT
Zhe project developer shall enter into a development agreement with
the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not
limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park
dedication fees and fees for urdergrounding of utilities. Said
agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits.
11. TRANSFC11d4FRS
Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground
equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or
located underground such that said equipment is not visible from
public street areas.
SECTION IV: CONDITIONS AD =SPERED BY WE COMMUNITY DEVECOPMENr
DEPARZMWr
12. APPROVED EXHIBrIS
The reca='endation of approval is based on Ednibits A-1 through Irl
consisting of 9 Sheets dated January 19, 1990, except as may be
amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution.
13. INGRESS/BGRESS EASFMENZS
The applicant shall record an appropriate deed restriction and
covenant running with the land subject to approval of the City
Attorney, for all parcels which share a c=mn private drive or
private roadway with one or more other parcels. Said deed restriction
shall provide for necessary reciprocal ingress and egress easements to
and from the affected parcels. Said easements shall be recorded at
such time as interest in one or more of the affected parcels is
initially sold or transferred to another party.
Resolution No. 4242 (71-U-89) February 14, 1990
Page -4-
14. TRIP CONgayaNr
Land Use intensity shall be limited to an intensity that will not
generate more than sixteen (16) one way trips per acre during the peak
traffic hour. For purposes of ensuring conplianoe with the Traffic
Intensity Performance Standard, the following accounting of trips is
hereby incorporated into the project approval:
TRIPS GENE RATID BY PRUTEM
19,500 (x) 1 Trip/1,000 sq. ft. = 19.5 Trips
TRIPS ALiOCATID TO PRUTECP SITE:
1.22 acres (x) 16 = 19.5 Trips
SURPLUS TRIPS: None
In the event that a development does not utilize the full 16 trips per
acre allotted by the trip end performance starxlard, the owner of
record shall have the ability to retain, sell or transfer trips with
other property owners within the the Traffic Intensity Performance
Standard Area. All sales or transfers of trips shall be filed with
the Director of Community Development and the City Clerk. No sale or
transfer shall be considered finally consummated until a Use Permit
has been approved for the property to which the trips are to be
applied.
Zhe developer shall record a covenant to describe the trip acre
constraint and the total number of trips allocated to the particular
development at the time of development approval. The covenant shall
contain appropriate wording to suggest that future purchasers of the
property consult the individual Use Permit file to obtain an updated
status report of the total rnunber allocated to each particular
property-
15. PAREUTIG
Parking shall be provided at a ratio of one space for every 285 sq.
ft. of gross floor area for office development.
16. PrWECP IDENTIFICATION SIGNS
The applicant shall submit a caTprehensive detailed plan for informal
review by the Architectural and Site Approval Committee prior to
issuance of building permits.
17. STEVENS CREEK BOLUEVARD SIDEWALK STANDARDS
The installation of the sidewalk in conformance with the Stevens Creek
Conoeptual Plan will require the recordation of pedestrian and public
utility easements, located 5 ft. back of the existing property line,
leaving a 10 ft. parkway area from property line to curb line. Said
installation of sidewalk will be cot, leted in conjunction with the
development of the addition and renovation of said building.
Resolution No. 4242 (31-U-89) February 14, 1990
Page -5-
a t• 0 0�.t� il� . •. r.
11he applicant may defer Stevens Creek Boulevard Sidewalk Standard
improvements until any one of the following occur.
a. Adjoining properties east or west of the s ec jt parcel modify or
upgrade their existing improvements to a ignificant degree, thus
including street frontage enhancements as we 1;
b. The City Council directs that all obligated properties proceed with
improvements following due notification adequate time for
preparation of sites for construction activi
15. DIFICATION OF APPRWED DEVELOPMENT PION ��lCI'D
MOCcV�t)A►�'
In the event that the applicant or subsequent property owner shall
desire to make any minor changes, alterations or amendment of the
approved development plan, a written request or revised development
plan shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development. If
the Director makes a finding that the changes are minor and do not
result in a material affect upon the appearance or function of the
project, said changes may be certified on the revised plan. If
approval of said changes is withheld, the applicant may appeal to the
Planning Commission.
If the Director finds that the requested changes are material, such
changes shall be referred to the Planning Commission for approval. If
the changes are denied by the Planning Commission, the applicant may
appeal to the City Council as provided in City Ordinance No. 652.
If said changes are approved by the Planning Commission, an appeal may
be made to the City Council by any interested party. Further, any
Member of the City Council may request a hearing before the City
Council regarding said approved changes. Said request shall be made
within ten (10) days from the date of approval of said changes by the
Planning Commission.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of February, 1990, at a Regular Meeting
of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California,
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Adams, Fazekas, Mackenzie, Mann, Chairman Claudy
NOES: CCK11SSIONER.S: None
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
Is/ Robert Cowan
Robert Cowan
Director of Community Development
peresos\rso3luB9
/s/ John Claude
John Claudy, Chairman
Cupertino Planning commission