U-1983-04b1
IU.fUU lurrri-nr ' P.O. U0.5Nu
Culx rlind. C;rlifuu�id 9iU13 Cuprrfirw, Cahlvnid95Uli
lrlrtkht,nr: t4U81 _' il-i SUi
UEVAh111E%i OF F'LA%V'lGA1UUFYtLOY11t K7
Am
4-U-83
RESOLUTION NO. 2657
OF THE PLANNINS CDMMISSIDN OF THE CITY OF C111PERTIND
APPROVING A MINUR MDDIFICATIDN TO APPLICATION 4-u-H3-
THE MINOR MODIFICATION ALLOWS THE BUILDING
"EIGHT, MEASURED FROM THE TOP OF THE CURTAIL WPLL
PARAPET TO THE AVERAGE CURB GRADE, TO BE 63 FT -
IN LIEU DF 60 FT_
The approval is contingent upon a 10 ft. increase in amine
building setback distance meat+ured irnm Do A=& Boulevard.
PA'SSM MW OMOPlED this 24tt* day of Ju—f 29M.,, at a: r" ►
moeti M of the Planning Commiission caf tea City m+ CuApm►t 42m-
statr of Call +ocni a' by ties +ca lowNing -211 CAI I wmtaez:
A'YZSs Cxwmi ssi mww-s Ate,. Mla zkamz i-w� Sc rmmmmn. mut
Chasm Li audy
Nixes Konm
ABS Mlwz Nons
AMSEXTz Sze
Fft3bert Gmwan Jam cl anady, chaaroaam
Rsaisfant Planning Director Plasusing C==dw ion
r
Citil of Cupertino
cu;rrtmo. Crhw-w 95M4 95015
le;v.ph.n- i4Obj
OFFICE DFTHE CITY CLERK
Z32—ly 31 1R-55
sll�� LDL
--�t�!
mim:tm--
xf
df the szt-j4ezz ;L-Opert'y M)e an
the Diricw af tile Z:rlarbt-- z1f
.amzr---e, vhl--Zke-vcr Z)Zzzr-s ;Opmse2
stn'll be d=z:tz:ae4 zLf the ro=z�l det�erzinez Zbe lozzZi= as
inappropriate. If the Couned. decides to permit the
Chamber's offices to be located on the property, the
applicant shall be deemed to have complied with Condition 18
of th eCity Council Action Letter dated May 29, 1985 when he
purchases the property and grants its development rights to
the City of Cupertino or its designee. The applicant sha11
not be responsible for construction of the Chamber's
offices.
..�SAC2S'elYa ,
MDR07HY CORIMLTUS ~
C='TY rr -ax
r«
.Tirp��^men: of ?'—sdvet
De An
4-U-83
RESOLUTION NO. 2381
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A FOUR-STORY '
OFFICE BUILDING EQUALING APPROXIMATELY 75,000 SO. FT.
APPLICANT: Carl N. Swenson Company. Inc.
ADDRESS: 95 South Market Street. ;Rite 600. San Jose. California 95113
SUBMITTED: February 1. 1983
LOCATION: West side of North De Anza Boulevard anprosimately 200 ft.
south of Mariani Avenue
FINDINGS AND SUBCONCLUSIONS:
Approval 3s Sera=iended subject to the findings as set forth on Page 1 and
subconciusions as set forth in the minutes of the Tlarming Commission meeting
of March 14. 1983.
,+ CONDITIONS:
1 14. Standard Conditions to the extent that they do not conflict with the
special conditions eznmerated herein. In the event a conflict does
e,Ist. the special =ond1=1nns as eanmerated herein shall apply.
15. 'This is based on ixhibits A 1st Revision. B and C 1st Revision
of Amp"i at nn- 4-U--33 as may be madifiled by additinnal, conditions
-amtal=ed herein-
3-6- ►rbe —4n, 1rJW -.o 6 AzaSa .'skid- c. _a t'^...�21 - o—
prow1de a mare e1re= a=e" sa the soap body of -parking_ 1he
redesign =g .evolve a shift -in drivet=ay location =0 13ae up with
tbe --=:zbL'r2y 1:14t or =be m32 bu:2d1=9_ the Disectar of 71-1-v
=a meaelpm= ski I- - the zutb ,-g m =prove the design changes-
l7. 7be prnjecr is Named up= an off-3zreer Park3�v ratio of one
.;D&ce far esrb ZES s9- ==- of ass f''_oor Brea_ The ratio of compact
spaces %a=,1 Mar e—p-q! 5= of natal TkarkiaR space 3zventory_
l.$. The 1 a± =be .:tzmrzc=U= of =be 75.DDD_ gross sq. fi. of building
area is —11nee=a rhr Vie: of nips (development rights) from
amber saxes_ _be '.---'.�^ stml"' be mequired u record a covenant an
the traasferrizxg g4- rb reflect the reduction of nips available prior
to issuance D--t=4;11&!-s -z� SAT =he 3pbject z=ucri=e.
The land use ;�•r• �'± r ssa' i be 14.ai:r6 : a as 3ntensiry =baz Vila Mot
generate more tban It, one-wa; —3ps p r acre dur miz the weak traffic
hour or such amber ^3if3r coasctaiars as i=sed by the LI ent
General Plan. For =be zf =be 1£ oar -Oar trap '-T ffac Intensity
Performances Sraadara..s. the-oI'rne' azz— -1-9 of .-r-t— is hereby
incorporated into the p=Jecr
C I T Y O F C U P E R T I N 0
City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
Telephone: (408) 252-4505
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO REC0.MCD-
ING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an
application for a USE PERMIT, as stated on Page 2; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support
said application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds' that the application meets the
following requirements:
a. That the use or uses are in confozm3nce u,1th the general aim
and is not detrimental to existing uses or to us*s spe-lically
permitted in the zone in which the proposed use =s to be .
b. That the property involved is adequate in size mod '.apc to
accomoodate the proposed use-
C. 7hat the proposed use Will not generate a level. of trsstr
over and beyond that. of the rapacity of t°ae exism1g street
system-
d. That the proposed use is otherwise not d#et-ftemma to cbm
iieaitis, safety, peace, morals and gaml well-+t af
residi-ag or working in the neigibormad of saw mot
nor injurious to property and inpras*us s tb* =e1gtft=-
hood.
STOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLED:
;f That after careful consideration of maps. fats x 1=x m# &Z4ser
evidence Submitted in this matter, the sII :-sz= as _; a'be ?e_L�r
is hereby aecoamended for approval, subject ra tMac Errs ssmed:
'E on Stage 2; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
M
That the aforementioned findings be a4pr-wed 2=t Aid=,ref. Acme Lice
Secretary be, and is hereby directed to =ti-- cse �=-IeS faL-t�e� _
this decision.
d non^±f!+a wv. ?g- 21
.-U-83
RESOLUTION NO. 2381 (continued)
Trips Generated_by the Project:
Offices - 75,000 sq. ft. a 1 trip per 1,DDO so- ft. = 75.0
Trips Allocated to Project Site:
3_078 gross acres + .18 acre on Sandler a 16 = 52-13
52 trips - 6 previously transferred 46
Deficient Trips =(29.0)
All sales or transfer of trips must be filed with she Pla*ni= Director
and City Clerk. No sale or transfer shall be finally cnns==ared unril
a use permit has been approved for the aroperty to whicb the trips are
to be applied. The appl^iranr -hail record a covenant to describe the
trip acre constraint and the =total- number of trips allocated to =be
particular development. At the time of development, a covenant siha11
be worded in a manner to suggest that the future purchaser of properties
consult the individual use permit =4le to obtain an up- m date status
report of trips allocated to each Particular properrv.
19. The applicant shall install one secured bicycle locks- {arili=v (bicycle
locker) for every 5.500 sq. ft. of buildine area wbich may be is lip., of
equivalent parking spaces_ The term "in lien" does not require rbar the
parking spares be ead=inarpd-
2D. Truck movements Jnrl1 a�nr refuse ?-I on the sire shall be r s= i*rpa
in the same �r as set forth in Section lo-45-D3D of the Cupertino
M mJrd a3 rode -
The appl3rasr Oar its S=:=esSVxS IM interest) shall enter iuzo an agreement
too JOia a saccz_spol. van ,?X=2 ?--=gr��z�o�'be eszaa l i �a ha the of
Q`Sa npert:1no- id ag: emmr, zorFJ ax ,ciry's option. J=raude Provisions
ons
reqci-lag =9114— (M-- ATE -MM==esSMTS in interest) SD provide b7 7.eaSe
or phase- s4 rn sue (1) = ran for ear1, 25 DDD sq. ft- of
e=Piasee-0sesp104 n:-ar a=ex- ?raris3aa of said vans is xa be r-on-
=p= tee ,o• =ess of t2!-�aZ prngram. smzcess 'Being 3ei :sad
as - S ar =Pau &f=*= acmd 3zc3icienr paving rs s�� to nay
22- 3° t appr.-esfl is :cy--- a 1=� =-X 75.9m sq_ ft- $axa-Mary aff3re
bUI24if=g =n& Tw 12_14.,.,.. =1y JTrJnL?"►i�l arim ietr
3 atiom df3res
°sat S3-" =PMA ==Mza==-IMa uses_ A11 new uses
ar �h' mt= — f the nffice uses shall
r '-e =Se Pe=cl ra Iaw cos ze=z==! ed by the ])3seczar of PSmming_
33- The z �i,_a�i+rw f- _ z== a find1mg mat ibere 3s
adequate 3euL-- =zp—:"2' $,.1- t!he 7ro jiect and DundeveloDed stt-
in the offAmtedi ----k se= e area_ if the rapacity is nos avail-
ab3e and the :-,..*�- � ice_ zz=== ==cerise ravazity rim emaloy n-r —ally
ac table aI=!gai2=X mrs-,;=es. ::�e prajert may not be xecDrded and
sub—quenrly ^^GS2Z1Lr .
:-U-83
RESOLUTION N0. 2381 (continued)
24. Height is limited to 50 ft_ to the top of the building parapet (refer
to north elevations of Exhibit B) as measured from rhe,top of curb
elevation along De Anza Boulevard.
25. The applicant/property masers shall record a covenant entexInz into
reciprocal ingress/egress easements with the adjoining orv;w-" vie_-s_
26- ,The applicant/property owner_ ee to participate in his =rvpo�'*�rs i
ribare of major of%site scree improvements of a 'oca' or cnmmzz=!=-wIde
nature, such as major improvements to the intersection of De A-
-Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard. Said agreement she i71,..��
'but not be limited to, agreement to participate in a =o-_a1 !=Vrraemomt
district, or directly contribute to street improvements. If as asstzsne-=
' district is formed, the applicant/property owners' sra-e aid be
determined by a cost benefit ratio as established by asses»- 'A. =r.I=
law. Boundaries for any district would be determined at a 2arm date pv
assessment dis=lct law. The agreements to insrall tide abome s
shall be submitted .and recorded prior to or in cm-njt=Lc-_I--Y--
i arnanre of bs'i l a� permits.
27.. Modification of the Approved Development Plan or a 3txlld� Pre -
III the event That the applicant rant or subsequent proaerrr 'umL- s"F+ '=m"Z
to make any minor ri,�noes alteration or t s_ :�-- z;F., i
development plan or building permit. a written requfSt and rzsts&--P
development ar building permit shall be submitted tt��o� .=�b.�e
l etc
Planning and Devenrm,ent. If the Director o£ Planning. and 3eveZ uw=
—'k- a finding that the r�.�pc are minor and do not a fey he aseneraT
appearance of -the area or the interests of owners of or
adjoiTTImp the development area, the Mirector of Tlara in ame- "ere'o
may cert3iS the cl-Re on The revised plan. If such approwma is 9r"-bh�TA.
the applira,.r may appeal to the Plying CommissUn- If the chn=gg =e
material, The Director of Planning and bevelopmenr sba' ? a"5'4- ::hm ebrsw
to the Planning Commission for approval_ If the change is A�$!d tm the
Planning Commission, the applicant may appeal to the City rlt as
provided in Ordinance No. 1632 of the City of Cupertino_ If tee -•- is
approved, an appeal may be made by an Interested parry_ Ps- , near
lepmber of the City Cosmcil may request a hearing befine the r s".,said
request to Be made within ten (10) clays from date of apprz-va: , the
cbange has been approved by the 2)12ffi3ng Commission
PASSID AM ADOPTED this 14tb day of Marcb, 1983, at a =egssiar
P1annAmg Commi slun of the City of Cupertino, State of Caliror ia, bw the
fallowing roll —11 vote:
0vc: Commissioners Binneweg, Blaine, Cloudy, Chairman Ades
NAYS: Commissioner Ro_nixzer
ABSTAIN: 'None
ASS=: Bone
/s/ James $. Sisk
James P. Sisk
PIM�+M Director
/s/ Victor J. Adams
Victor J_ Adams, Chairman
Planning Commission
4-U-B3
RESOLUTION NO. 115E
OF THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL COMMITTEE
OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF �
13F LANDSCAPIW FOR A PROPERTY CONSISTING OF 4,000
So- IFT.
PROPERTY OWNER: Carl N. Swenson Company
APPLICAW-a Carl N. Swenson Company
ADDRESS: 95 S. Market Street, Suite 600,
San Jose, California 95113
LOCATION OF PROPERTY= West side of North De Anza Boulevard
approximately 450 it. north of Lazaneo
Drive
f= INDINSS:
The Architectural and Site Approval Committee finds that the
preposrd landscaping plan is consistent with the landscaping on
iaarounding pr'aperties and the North De Anza Boulevard r .: ept-1
Plan_
LAINDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
1-8. STANDARD CONDITIONS
Architectural a6d Site Approval Standard Conditions to
the extent that they do not coif1icit aAth tha specaml
conditions enumerated herein. In the event a cramflict
dies exist, the conch to ans as ®mamwrated fm•rese
shall apply-
9- WWRO ED EXHIBITS
That the rtcn nsiam datz on o4 approval i m bawd on Esfaei>tmar t
L 2nd Revision of fipplacatzan 4-i)-13 rat as mmy lbw
amerce by special conda ti ons srranerated harrin.
30_ FBI MW EASEr T
The appl i cant shall vecm d a pedestrian lasom mt
the sidewalk area., subject to stiff avwwwwal-
AM ADOPTED this 24th day ni Jun=. 1985, at a exyular
moorting of the Architecturail and Site Approval Committee of tfrr
City of Cazpert3 no, State of California. by the f of l ari ng rail
call vote:
AYES: Committee Members Chapman, Jacksnn, TLan n, !Mabel
Mairman Tliller
MAYSz None
ABSTAIN: None
AM5£NTz Wone
ATTESTo APPROVED:
Js/ Sonia Binnendyk /s/ Martin Miller
Sonia Binnendyk Martin 'Miller, Chairman
Pl Amer II Architectural and Site Approval Committer
4-U-83
RESOLUTION NO. 2640
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVINS AN AMENDMENT TO USE PERMIT 4-U-83
APPLICANT: Carl N. Swenson (Itsuo Uenaka)
ADDRESS: P. D. Box, 1337, San Jose, California 95109
SUBMITTED: April 26, 1905
LOCATION: best side of North De Anza Boulevard approximately
200 ft. south of Mariani Avenue.
1. The minor amendmen: modifies Condition 18 setting forth the
TRIP and FAR cred:i- accounting for the project. Condition 18
of Application 4-U-33 is redrafted as follows:
COND1 2ON 1s
1$. That a mm-creal of the consU action of tier 75,0OO! giross sg-
ft- of bzuldxng arra as cmet►sc s0 upomm the tratzs#ar a#
tr'%ps or F'laaes- Rrss Ratio- cradits fifwelop — t riovuw' firs
V"G r sates as lasted an F.=onbrit A and trett scot satisn rsF
tins iar'v "eta ?parts- stars located ass Asawfflmo►'3 3
-yr � Thm Caty of Crapart2Ad shall be 1,-aatad
do'-w-Xgftes CWV ef"v- szta~ or a peIWs--s SMW'Vlct
so'W l be ' racorsd an the sxto t= prWoent +Wturwl
larfiftc azng- The sa4-�W ftW Its moist or loosed to owners
V W"M c e aeit-'�oxim tt+W sub;-'— axt�_ Ti+s JODI x :aar't
Vfta3l aremtall long Da!Wd
ptaes IfteLl teat cowpatmj3la wzLtis tse DW Hera Bm3 +rar^d
Qm1cszptual PI an and tteer lawodscagm plan 'koor' ad sag-
ts. Ties amlicant sbail be r4scosarmd. is " M
essvasaant on tho traresfir+rsasg sates to . 1—t: thw ?1Xd"Cti4M
of trips or Floor Are& ratzss crwlt-e� prsaar I=
z-MMuaaac3 of bto-14 .2nq pervats fear ttra subsr ect straeturm<a.
least sass i-mw�ty mball to l.xm&'ti d to an it ', stt�r
that mall t7ea! a"-s sore than Sae nrv!"+ra-f tr'=Ps VW aefs
dtsing t W paaek tra.Fiic hnxw or sLach attmw tra#iac
cor*straez am is4rosed by' tiee' c3a'rarat San rma Plan- For
tie! Dot-Voaor of time lie onw--www trap Traffic 1ntdr2saitir
%mrformaarce St3andarbs. tls aecneant2rQ of trips is dEia»ad
b,v t m att shoot -abdat On*- labeled F--th :b t A. dn%=ft s s
her ay X corm rated X to t!te proloc't AgPsra--sl-
+ill sales or tr-"Wxfer of ts"aps. ar FAR cm tS e!nt sa +sled
ea th ttae p2 area: "a D�Txw'tmr mud City C'i eric . 14M sal a or
tra-sfer steal 1 be f a eean 1 y cmnsuftented agate l a use Peraci t
Aaendaent has been a=Wowwo for the yraperty to sonch treat
traps are to be applaed_ The applicant shall recard,a
�1-
Planning Commission Resolution No. 2640 (continued) 4-U-83
covenant to describe the trip acre constraint and the total
number of trips allocated to the particular development.
At the time of development, a covenant shall be worded in a
manner' to suggest that the future purchaser of properties
consult the individual Use Permit files to obtain an
up--to-date status report of the trips allocated to each
particular property.
2. A neN condition is added regarding the maintenance of the
former 'auto parts` store site.
COWTM 29
29. The applacant shall be responsible for the maintenance of
laedscaPSaq and yaarking fle► tEre flo m 'auto parts' site
CAM rm#erarscsd isr Condttmn iB abvww. Said
mmi. lialaslity may be amssgmed to the ad.7CMVMng
property area tss the i CAM TEre tramaier
of eai.nta wwMCM l labi l ter must bee recrrrried v'%a a comremamrt
avw by, the City AttnrTmv-
AM ACUPTEV this 1 tla v a+ Mary. :'9. at Aw reigral ar
ammiirMZ Of' the PlAM%Wn% CONOW-M 40W 0+ ttar Git-y C+ #r—
State of California. by thw fasllooft a roll -call wcw--
AVE$: Caawicam rs Adams. "Mckmn-rim. soraeasen
MOM walm thadrmaea Szabo
AINISTAIM Moue
Ctssi rmmn Cl arrdy
ATTEST'
rs `?..awes a- Sisk 3 Szabo
James M. raisk Ntchnias Szabo. Vitt INamrman
P'iamii�nq Vjr-ector PIann nq CamaFismton
-2-