Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
U-1977-31b
31-U-77 RESOLUTION NO. 1789 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO • RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO ALLOW CON- STRUCTION OF AN INDUSTRIAL BUILDING CONTAINING' APPROXIMATELY 36,500 SQ. FT. APPLICANT: Dr. Joseph 'F. Brown ADDRESS: 10365 N. De Anza Blvd. , Cupertino, California 95014 SUBMITTED: October 10, 1977 LOCATION: Northerly terminus of Bandley Drive FINDINGS AND SUBCONCLUSIONS: Approval is recommended subject to the findings as set forth on Page 1 and subconclusions as set forth in the minutes of the Planning Commission meet- ing of December 12, 1977. CONDITIONS: 1-14. Standard Conditions to the extent that they do not conflict with the special conditions enumerated herein. In the event a conflict does exist, the special conditions enumerated herein shall apply. 15. The approval is based upon Exhibits A and B of Application 31-U-77, as may be modified by the conditions contained herein. ® 16. That the property owner shall provide potential..tenants with a written notice regarding potential traffic problems within the area. Said notice shall stipulate that the City reserves the right to review compliance with the 16 trip-end traffic constraint at any time in the future and should the City determine that the constraint is exceeded, the City may impose additional measures to ensure com- pliance. Said measures include but are not limited to the following: a) Staggering of work hours by the tenants. b) Tenant organized car pooling and van pooling programs and/or County transit bus pooling programs. • A copy of said written notice shall be signed by the lessee and forwarded to the City prior to occupancy of the building. 17. The land use intensity shall be limited to an intensity that will not generate more than 16 one-way trips per acre during the peak hour period. For the purpose of the 16 one-way trip Traffic Intensity Performance Standard, the following accounting of trips is hereby incorporated into the project approval':' Trips allocated to project area 3.16 gross acres x 16 = 51 allowable trips ® Trips generated by use 2.92 net acres x 20 x 29 = 51 used trips 33 Surplus trips = 0 -2- 31-U-77 Resolution No. 1789 (continued) 18. That the applicant shall install a mini cul-de-sac at the terminus of 410 Fargo Drive and shall participate in partial improvements for a mini cul-de-sac at the terminus of Hanford Drive. The mini cul-de-sac at Fargo Drive shall be installed in conjunction with this application. Plans for `said cul-de-sac shall be presented to, the Architectural and Site Approval Committee for approval. 19. The applicant shall prepare an acoustical noise analysis to determine the height of the acoustical sound wall required along the westerly and southerly boundaries. Said report shall be prepared and submitted to the Architectural and Site Approval Committee. 20. The applicant shall sign a statement agreeing to provide joint ingress/ egress easements with adjacent properties. The agreement shall stipu- late that the City will require implementation of said easements until the City can require the same of the adjoining property owner. Said agreement shall further stipulate that the applicant agrees to mutually • participate in the private drive improvements and common maintenance agreements for the common usage of the northerly drive with the property to the north should said property be developed industrially. The agreement shall be subject to approval of the City Attorney. 21. The applicant shall install one secured bicycle locking facility for every 6,500 sq. ft. of building area which may be in lieu of equivalent parking spaces. The term "in lieu" does not require that the parking spaces he eliminated. © 22. Truck movements including refuse pickup. on the site shall be restricted . in the same manner as set forth in Section 10.45.030 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of December, 1977, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the fol- lowing roll call vote: • AYES: Commissioners Adams, Gatto, Markkula NAYS: Commissioners Blaine, Koenitzer ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None ATTEST: APPROVED: VOLA-COW-CA • Robert Cowan R. D. Koenit r, C airman • Assistant Planning Director Planning Commission -3-