U-1975-09bt
jr
ji ES I t,° 10 IN £ ( 14 �j q
i0# ;i;= �£ .k.�.:�ay �,t�,s,�'�y>'i�k, O 1"HE +�x�}'i�tc) ,q.t'FP
Sit«(".0.;Y J Li t�I%VAL OF A USE `IEE � t e3 �� �:t,s LLOW
t`: � �a,t�ii c,Y �. �._
} 4 Tct pyx *r+
��Fg'
Cam # p
7
APPLICANT,t tt Er{ia Saving � st `n i t�r2,cit� 3:i o � n }tact;
` T F
L ul-11 I -ran . ci the e nue '.=.5..4`jLt.on cfs: Stp,"r.'4"i�,+s Creek 0 �_:�.dy
as
Rd
Esil Y .. - k. s:. #tiFC.. X.s 3>x Y .Lti zoa
«.+...»,.y ,., ,,., ..«-,.--...a...'r.,ar.,n.,.-.>®.az..«.e.s»..,..«:.«.««.a,<ama«...w...._w»_w.s.«...,«E..—,.,..««....,.,..----.n..mco.. =»x. w...., «. ---.w—..«,.,m.«.,.u....,«v.«.wu:w._««.. �. _:�.......a....,.:«.
1
p
01zC,01)11'-,�`.°,7`it 3 .f1®V'. P,J 7:' 1."�C..-L £"3 7,.r», T ITTD N 3 a
j psi a g o #-y they
- 2(" with
t g''�f' �. [.. 1.."i 5"" 44 t 1 C: i;ttk 4£ te: i t��il. b:. *«G -i.
tl
yy '¢ r to 3 r 11 ( + ( r9 $,,, �} _ y.
5.¢jiaf <Li,S t»t. 1,11 -t lkla cr„�eea1; c�.F& is t�kl
*rv�::ff
vl
w�.-S
Vics�+ j
he �s pec�.aJ �`.4° ���,��.,�.F ril ', ..£ti �"''#£.,:��k.,i C t -F"`' tG. i«.1 i C is
shall
�
15y .
, h tits. appl,411ca Lon -is ap tov { £t �,< s r, tkf � ili-i , pp I } �� dl of,
9-U-75 as nul • $ice av4.4..,"i's.led brts*' `Jd: - Ana co Y"itr,-V: _
.w. 5 '.That'I.J, acres €--, the +.t%e'llY r.ii..,�Y,'«' a t - «qr1 'Y; ¢a'�f? <>i SiI P -
g a I I b� �t~
�77 { �.i. al
. .i,. Gni �..3 .... L «-0 p "he 5., �. ter' �;,.x ,C S. r.s e3.. �a 'C:,� r.
g��+�.�
C#. :#3' time n i_�:ee future tL, 7 +... i, -... ,, C.a:C>: � 1 e.3..,f°•,. +.,..k, £w ��, µ' i�`.e .. �al�w �;.t.
- t .
'`e
,
YYtt "j( m;;^ts, nyq
-i,.ddl .:.
o n g ani ki a Ss;:.:1: �`•,,` , ., � � � "5 �,ekz w�„.S�. x. �;,�� _
3.
*'ss :Ls \,z iii ^.Rt{ y t•t, :f_=.$ t. k)i'3 tf Ss,. .. ,i ��g
„
rog
} is a. - .t
�- _ c,"�_ It x., � -. a. *.iv' 1 �. - 't3Ns d 4 k r 4 ? c,. 1 xa z.. s` �' a T d i 3.Fk`.F
,
44 j
avid p r} ,.Y.t_ i! tt . it
a
T9}z C.._i .awY<., 4, '�.ir�S i t. :. ;:. .Y R;', _r .« v� ♦L=.. z.a k .des ,a -L c,. ..r,:. #{
p -a s-.„. �
z
-1h-0-1
Cs
{
0 F ., ? _i :., ' t 3
-
_ .±, :�'• s�}1 Wit+ 23s�� i c._,,- .-k Lt f k_e ?r` ...>ct � �.. �.'{{ tz_, `* L;i£ !; i, $
}
,&. 'tn'ss a i gt tr --i i �;� F�," i-) k -• _k .E. ,. k£ . .. a13 �.
.._>.�5,._
q v
Resolution No. 1464 (continued)
20. ThaL SHQJ60) parkivg spaces shall be allocated for use by the
savings and .off€n sadcil ty; The stacking spaceswithin he defined
driveway h3.;=ie to the drive -up T_ei_t:lity as st3w3`s n on Exhibit a I t
Revi lion shall be included within the sixty(60) space7requiremont,
21. That ..Il,. 50 -foot .Lanid ec'?}e:s I3tYfx'<" strip adjac:Yltr tQ Stevens Creek
Blvd. shall be extendod to Cho easterly bounjary of the o,eraii
#^ x % L 1 4 .tf 2: ..F' thethec``t s`� t,i tj `tt a Said 50 -foot area i.§6 r� t � € s -
Y ek�"ta��,�sf'§amajor ci �? t.�
4PHS at the intersection ion of Richwood ood C: o t, aid Miller ssv«.«'nut? shall
PAId in its cntlrety.
'nf Ax"MI Af
DOPTED this ! x day of November, i
, at a regular meeting o
the P,rrc"i h .t';,,;�t�ion oft e City o Cupertino, tino, State fit: California,
by
the osly roll call vote:
pp�p ,A s t p
I L « ' �`21�#issioiiex`.`s Adams, Ct3:s�.:�rtr, O'Keefe, Woodward
RAYS;
» qy ^+cn
ABSENT: None
Matting ng €>C ` r. gsioli
ATTEST;
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER
Va
SUMMARY
AGENDA DATE July 17, 1978
SUBJECT AND ISSUE- Applications 9-U-75 (Revised) and 16-T;1-78 - Tine O.K. Earl Corporation,
John Gray (Stevens Creek Boulevard and !filler avenue)
The applicants request a use permit to construct a 15,500 sq. ft. %Ircury Savings & Loan
northern headquarters building and a future 17,400 sq. ft. Home Federal Savings building;
and tentative map to subdivide approximately 3.6 acres into three parcels consisting of
approximately one acre each. The subject property is located on the southeast corner
of the intersection of Stevens Creek Boulevard and ?filler Avenue immediately behind and
contiguous to the existing service station located on the corner. The principal concerns
as discussed by the Planning Commission included the adequacy of the landscaping area
adjacent to Richmond Court and the apartments to the south; the driveway location serving
.
reel No. 3; the proposed left turn access from west bound traffic on Stevens Creek
ulevard: and finally the architecture of the proposed compatibility of the buildings.
The Commission left the question of whether left turn access from Stevens Creek Boulevard
should be permitted to the discretion of the Director of Public Works and recommends that t:le
driveway serving the existing Mercury Savings & Loan building be retained and jointly
utilized to serve Parcel No. 3. The Commission felt that the proposed driveway on
Parcel No. 3, as desired by the applicants, places the probable left turn pocket too
close to the existing left turn lane serving the Vallco Financial Center and that it
is more logical to place the driveway where it serves the needs of patrons of the ifercury
Savings and Loan building who will use the driveway more frequently throughout the day
than employees of the proposed office building. Additionally, the Commission recommends
that a minimum 15 ft. landscape setback area be accommodated along the southerly property
line of Parcel No. 3 and that two of the parking stalls adjacent to the driveway off of
Richwood Court be converted to lanscaped area. In addition, the Commission is
recommending that the future Home Federal Savings building of Parcel No. 2 be set back
a minimum of 20 ft. from all property lines which is to be used exclusively for landscaping
accommodate several large 24 inch box =reel to screen and buffer the proposed building
The proposal is consistent with the General Plan and conforms with the Traffic Intensity
Performance Standard.
Recommendation
T"ie Planning Commission recommends approval of applications 9-U-75 (Revised) and 16-TN-78
with the conditions as enumerated on the attached resolutions.
Enclosures:
Planning Commission Resolutions No. 1863 and 1864
Staff Report of July 6, 1978
Environmental Assessment Worksheet
Environmental Review Committee Recommendation
ERC :linutes of June 6, 1978
Central Fire District Letter dated July 5, 1978
Exhibit A of 9-U-75 (Revised)
Staff alternate Exhibit of 9-U-75 (Revised)
Exhibit A of 16-TM-78
9-IJ-75 (Revised)
11
•
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE PLANNING CO?EMISSION OF TEE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMLNIENDING APPROVAL OF REVISION OF A USE PERMIT
TO CONSTRUCT A 15,500 SQ. FT. MERCURY SAVINGS AND
LOAN NORTHERN HEADQUARTERS BUILDING AND A FUTURE
17,400 SQ. FT. HOME FEDERAL SAVINGS BUILDING.
APPLICANT: The O.K. Earl Corporation/John S. Gray
ADDRESS: 199 South Hudson Avenue, Pasadena, California 91101
SUBMITTED: May 22, 1978
LOCATION: Southeast corner of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Miller ?venue
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approval is recommended subject to the findings as set forth on Page 1 and
subconclusion as set forth in the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting
of July 10, 1978.
CONDITIONS:
1-14. Standard Conditions to the extent that they do not conflict with the special
conditions enumerated herein. In the event a conflict does exist, the
special conditions enumerated herein shall apply.
15. The approval is based upon Exhibit A and Staff Alternate of Application
9-U-75 (Revised), as may be amended by additional conditions contained
herein. All of the conditions of approval of the original use permit
Application 9-U-75 (Planning Commissior Resolutions No. 1464 and 1492)
shall remain in full force and effect except to the extent that their
provisions are superceded or amended by exhibits or conditions contained
herein.
16. The land use intensity shall be limited to an intensity that will not
generate more than 16 one-way trips per acre during the peak traffic hour.
For the purposes of the 16 one-way trip traffic intensity performance
standard, the following accounting of trips is hereby incorporated into
the project approval:
Parcel No. 1 - 1.07 acres (existing building)
No. of trips allocated 1.07 acres x 16 17.1
No. of trips generated by project (City Council
action notice of January 22, 1976) 15.0
Surplus trips 2.1
Parcel No. 2 - 1.28 acres
No, of trips allocated 1.28 x 16................................. 20.5
No, of trips generated - 17,400 x 1 trip per 1,000 sq. ft. .......= 17.4
Surplus trips 3.1
Parcel No. 3 - 1.22 acres
No, of trips allocated 1.22 x 16................................. 19.5
No. of trips generated - 15,460 x 1 trip per 1,000 sq. ft. 15.5
Surplus trips 4.0
-2-
July 6, 1978
Applications 9-U-75 (Revised) and 16-Ty-78 - The U.K. Earl Corporation
(Stevens Creek Boulevard and Miller Avenue)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
t:hich can be attained at the southerly end of Parcel No. 3 and along the Stevens
Creek Boulevard frontage. The staff's alternate exhibit also eliminates the
proposed left turn access from Stevens Creek Boulevard and the new driveway cut
in front of the Mercury headquarters building in favor of retaining the existing;
curb cut. The Traffic Engineer has reviewed the circulation layout and feels
that a left turn access on Stevens Creek Boulevard would be hazardous and that
the proposed driveway location would encourage motorists to negotiate a left turn
from Stevens Creek Boulevard even though it is rot permitted. The Architectural
and Site approval Committee applied a condition to the original Mercury Savings
application which stated that the City shall have the ability to close one of
the driveway accesses to the property and review the }lans to convert various
asphalted areas to landscaping. By consolidating the driveways serving Parcel 3
and the existing Mercury Savings site, the proposals are consistent with the
intent of this condition.
• The setback distance between the parking lot and the proposed building on Parcel
No. 2 shall be increased to provide additional landscaping to help screen the
commercial activity from the adjoining residential neighborhood. The staff suggests
that the landscaping along Richwood Court be increased to a minimum distance of
140 ft. back of curb and a landscape area immediately adjacent to the proposed
building on the corner be increased to a minimum width of 20 ft. between the property:
line and the beginning of the building pad on both the Richwood Court and ?filler
Avenue frontages. These suggestions will require revisions in the parking stall
layout and/or building square footage proposed for Parcel No. 2.
Finally, the staff is concerned that motorists utilizing the subject property have
eventual direct access into the corner commercial service station site. The staff
suggests a condition requiring the applicants to enter into reciprocal ingress/egress
easements with the adjoining service station site at such time in the future as the
City can require the same of the property owner of the service station site. Such
an agreement may require the deletion of several parking stalls. Whether this
requirement would be implemented will depend upon future plans for the service station
• site.
ASAC Review
The Architectural and Site Approval Committee's preliminary review of the subject
application raised two concerns relating to the adequacy of the landscaping along,
the easterly property line between the existing Mercury Savings site and the proposed
headquarters building and the lack of a transition in architectural stvle between
the existing Home Federal Savings building and the Mercury Savings building. The
proposed conditions require these matters to be considered at the time of the
submittal to the Architectural and Site approval Committee.
Recommendation
The Environmental Review Committee recommends that the subject application be eranted
a Negative Declaration since they are consistent with the City of Cupertino Genera!
Plan and Committee finds that it will not have a significant impact upon the
environment.
The staff recommends approval of these applications subject to the conditions as
listed on the attached resolutions.
-2-
July 6, 1978
•
F-I
L
Applications 9-U-75 (Revised) and 16-T"1-78 - The O.K. Earl Corporation
(Stevens Creek Boulevard and Miller Avenue)
Enclosures
Statement of Findings for a Use Permit
Statement of Findings for a Tentative Map
Recommended Resolutions
Recommendation of Environmental Review Committee
ERC Minutes of June 6, 1978
Exhibit A of 16-TM-78
Exhibit A of 9-U-75 (Revised)
Staff Alternate Exhibit of 9-U-75 (Revised)
-3-
Approved for Submittal
es H. Sisk
Tanning Director
n
ice- jt, 1 :`:w; �'. ` • , , . l.: c.
:,� •' i , i t i-fit ,I J IS '. _;.. •: a -
rrn rr
-•,. . I��;1��1 !",::.' �f• l!• '- F: � =i � e � n `� Pi rlil.i I � ,,
Min
is "�F I' 1 ii- �,• ' ''�yS�,` _� ;..1 L �i �)IL} i Tip 1_LM-
_l,
1 T
j7.,
4i` RY
77,
�l
I'll Z.
9-U-75 (Revised)
Planning Commission Resolution No. (continued)
Prior to issuance o� a building permit, the applicant shall record a
covenant to describe the trip acre constraint and the total number of trips
allocated to the particular development at the time of development approval.
The covenant shall be worded in a manner to suugest that the future purchaser
of properties consult the conceptual zoning files and the individual use
permit files to obtain an up-to-date status report of the total number of
trips allocated to each particular property.
17.
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a document
detailing measures to mitigate adverse impacts resulting from on -site
construction activities. Said document shall include a proposal for delivery
truck loading, noise attenuation for equipment, dust control, rodent control.
and hours of construction activity satisfactory to the Director of Planning
and Development. No outside heavy construction or grading will be permitted
on Saturdays of Sundays and all permitted work shall not commence before
7 a.m. and shall cease at 6 p.m.
1S.
Truck movements including refuse pickup on the site shall be restricted in
the same manner as set forth in Section 10.45.030 of the Cupertino Municipal
Code.
19.
The approval is for two office buildings consisting of 17,400 sq. ft.
(Parcel No. 2) and 15,460 sq. ft. (Parcel No. 3).
20.
The applicant shall enter into the reciprocal easement agreements as
required in Condtions No. 16 and 17 of the companion tentative map
Application 16-TM-78.
21.
The applicant shall provide a sound wall along the common property line
of the subject development and the adjoining residential development to the
south and shall provide dense landscaping along the entire southerly property
line to help screen the proposed development from the adjoining residential
neighborhood. The applicant shall accommodate a minimum of 15 ft. of
landscape setback area between the southerly property line of Parcel No. 2
•
and the beginning of the parking area. The proposed building pad for the
future Home Federal Savings building on Parcel No. 2 shall be set back a
minimum of 20 ft. from all property line which is to be used exclusively for
landscaping to accommodate 24" box trees to screen and buffer the proposed
building from the adjoining residential neighborhood.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this loth day of July, 1978, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
Robert Cowan Sharon Blaine, Chairperson
Assistant Planning Director Planning Commission
-3-
16-rl-78
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE PLANNING CO`DIISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE
APPROXIMATELY 3.6 ACRES INTO THREE PARCELS CONSISTING nF
APPROXIMATELY 1 ACRE EACH.
APPLICANT: The O.K. Earl Corporation/John S. Gray
ADDRESS: 199 South Hudson Avenue, Pasadena, California 91101
SUBMITTED: May 22, 1978
LOCATION: Southeast corner of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Miller Avenue
Approval is recommended subject to the findings as set forth on Page 1 and
subconclusion as set forth in the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting
of July 10, 1978.
CONDITIONS:
1-14. Standard Conditions to the extent that they do not conflict with the special
conditions enumerated herein. In the event a conflict does exist, the special
conditions enumerated herein shall apply.
15. The approval is based upon Exhibit A of Application 16-n!-78 as may be amended
by additional conditions contained herein.
16. The applicant shall record a covenant and deed restriction running with the
land, which is satisfactory to the City Attorney, which provides for reciprocal
ingress/egress easements by and between all parcels within the proposed
subdivision and by and between Parcel No. 3 and the existing Mercury Savings
and Loan Association site located immediately to the east. Said deed
restriction shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits or filing
of the final parcel map whichever comes first.
17. The applicant/owner shall provide a covenant and deed restriction running
with the land which obligates the owners of Parcel No. 2 to enter into
• reciprocal ingress/egress drives with the adjoining service station site
located to the north at such time in the future as the City can require the
same of the adjoining property owner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PASSED AND ADOPTED this loth day of July, 1978, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California by the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
Sharon Blaine, Chairperson
Planning Commission
Robert Cowan
Assistant Planning Director -2-