Loading...
1 - 2020 07-28 Vallco arborist inspection letter Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A 7/28/2020 Arborist Inspection Letter Inspection Time Period: July, 2020 Site: Vallco Town Center Period: Demolition Phase Work Zones: 1 A/1 B/1 C Craig Bacheller, Rafael Vinoly Architects (RVA) cbacheller(c vinoly.com Mike Rohde, Vallco Property Manager, mrohde(cDvallcoshopping mall.com (Sand Hill Property Co.) Paul Hansen, Sand Hill Construction Management phansen(@-shcmllc.com Clint Magill, Devcon Construction cmagill(a�devcon-const.com To whom it may concern: The author Walter Levison, Consulting Arborist or"WLCA" visited the site on 7/28/2020 to re-inspect tree protection measures, tree irrigation, and signage installed by Devcon for demolition zone 1A (and surrounding areas as applicable), which involves removal of parking structures at the southwest corner of the site. WLCA also reviewed various other site areas that are in the process of being fitted with surface mulch, tree protection fencing, etc. This report includes some or all of the following reference items: • Full Tree Map/Tree disposition and location map sheet P-0602B by OLIN (new version May, 2020). • Photographs/ Digital images representative of current site conditions archived in June, 2020 by WLCA. • Tree Data Table/The tree data table provided at the end of this report is the July, 2020 iteration. Trees removed from the site since start of project are noted on this Excel table with black hatching fill, and the rightmost column contains detailed, updated notes on tree condition, approximate removal date, etc. The database is updated to note all of the hundreds of permitted removals that have occurred since start of demolition. In this iteration, tree#429 is hatched out and noted as "signage posted for removal". • Updates per today's site visit(7/28/2020) are noted in non-bolded yellow highlight. To-do punchlist items for SHPCO or other site personnel are noted in black bold yellow highlight. Author's Side Notes: WLCA noted that in the WLCA tree database there are a very large number of the trees in dead, very poor, or poor overall condition that may die outright due to natural causes (e.g. soil moisture deficit from extended droughty weather conditions in California between roughly 2011 and 2017, etc.) unrelated to the Vallco property redevelopment work. As of today, most open soil tree root zone areas at Vallco are at roughly 70% to 100% field capacity soil moisture when probed with a Lincoln meter/probe, which is a direct result of our over-grade, heavy-flow type temporary irrigation system installed by SHPCO contractors. Mr. Mike Rohde of SHPCO noted 6/25/2020 that an irrigation system contractor has been newly retained by SHPCO to visit the Vallco Property site 1 x/month and perform activation testing of all the various irrigation valves, inspecting the above-grade PVC pipes for cracks, leaks, etc. and to verify that the tree irrigation system is performing as designed. 1 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARRORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT Mike Rohde of SHPCO requested that WLCA visit the Vallco site during the shelter in place order, so that we could formally document activities by homeless persons living around the Vallco site trees on N. Wolfe Road. WLCA visited the site on 4/15/2020 and approached the homeless camp with two security officers and Mr. Rohde. We archived digital photos of the homeless encampment, and noted the tag number#428 (see digital images below in this report). As of May, 2020, the camp consists of roughly fourteen (14)tents ranging from small to large family size tents that are set up on the tree planting strip between the public sidewalk and the public roadway(N. Wolfe Road), with accompanying cooking gear, gas powered generators, bicycles, and other items. The southmost tent is adjacent to street ash tree#431. The tents extend northward around street ash tree#428 which is the northmost tree remaining in our Vallco tree study population. The homeless camp tents extend further northward along the tree planting strip beyond tree#428 to a non-surveyed ash specimen on another property(see photos below in this report). The activities of the camp are likely having a significant negative effect on the trees' root systems per the following: • The open soil root zones are normally open to the air, and therefore would normally receive oxygen exchange with the atmosphere and natural rainfall. Placement of tents and other waterproof items over the ground results in loss of oxygen transfer between the roots and the atmosphere, causing the root zones of the trees to go somewhat anaerobic. • With tents placed over the root systems of the street ash tree specimens (trees#428, 429, and 431), the trees are not receiving • Update 6/25/2020: Irrigation water from SHPCO's hand-watering that used to be performed multiple times per week, every week, can no longer be performed due to the camp's presence, which means that trees#428, 431, and #432 along North Wolfe Road will not be receiving any irrigation. SHPCO has continued to hand-irrigate the area shown in blue on the map markup below, due to the homeless camp presence, and will not be installing piped water irrigation tubing to the camp area. Also note that a new large portable toilet has been placed adjacent to tree#442 by City of Cupertino, which further limits the irrigation that can be provided to the trees. Also, if the toilet were to leak or otherwise spill sanitized fluid from the septic holding tank of the portable unit onto the open soil root zone of tree#442, phytotoxic conditions could cause tree decline or death. Trees#435 to#441 are being hand-watered by SHPCO 3x/week per Mike Rohde. Below is a map markup by WLCA showing the current conditions of the camp area as of 6/25/2020: 2 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison AL CONSULTING ARR4R15T .,„.,,..,.a......,.._ ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A HOMELESS 0 428 ENCAMPMENT MAP (NOT TO SCALE) 431 6/2512620 WALTER LEVISON � 432 APPROX. LOCATION OF 435 TENTS 37 NORTH 440 SIGN INDICATING "FREEWAY 280" 441 AREA THAT SAND HILL IS 44 ABLE TO IRRIGATE BY HAND, USING A GARDEN HOSE. NEW LARGE-TYPE PORTABLE TOILET INSTALLED BY CITY OF CUPERTINO AS OF JUNE, 2026, ADJACENT TO TREE #442. EIGHT (8) STREET SIDE ASH TREE SPECIMENS NOTED ABOVE BY TAG NUMBER, ADJACENT TO NORTH WOLFE ROAD, CUPERTINO, CA. 3 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A • The trees' root systems are likely becoming unnecessarily compacted due to the extensive homeless foot traffic, homeless sleeping in tents, and weight of the various camp items over the ground, resulting in loss of natural oxygenated soil pore space that is necessary for tree roots to survive. It is difficult to restore the soil once compaction of pore spaces has occurred. Methods could include augering, water jetting, or Airspade air excavation to establish vertical decompaction channels in the soil profile inside which angular gravel can be placed to fill the voids. Fuel dumping could be negatively impacting tree roots in a severe manner(e.g. spills of gasoline used for the camp's electricity generators, and/or spills of camp cooking fuels used by camp occupants). • Human wastes (feces, urine, etc.) are likely being released daily by the homeless camp occupants. These materials can have a severe negative impact on the roots of the streetside ash trees, given that the materials are being released over an extended time period, on a frequent and repeated basis, directly over the open soil tree root systems as highly concentrated organic materials that have not been pre-composted by any means. These human wastes are typically high in salt(ion and cation)content, and can cause root death due to what is sometimes referred to as "fertilizer burn" (i.e. a "high salt index"). • Physical damages to the trunks and/or roots of trees #428 and/or#431 may also be occurring. • Tree Removals: WLCA expects that at least a portion of the camp and its occupants will need to be moved or removed in order to facilitate removal of tree#429, currently posted as to be removed per formal removal permit through City of Cupertino. The tree is located just east of the green clad chain link fence. However, the fence will need to be temporarily removed in order to facilitate tree removal, which means that the camp and its occupants will also need to be moved or removed. • 5/15/2020 Root Protection Zone (RPZ) Fence Vandalism: WLCA noted during the May 2020 site inspection that the homeless persons living on or near to Vallco property have (apparently) cut through the chain link material of the "south gate" at the south end of West Perimeter Road (WPR)which is a locked consulting arborist access point for entrance into the root protection zone (RPZ) used to exclude persons from entering into our over-grade irrigation area running in a north-south orientation under the redwood and ash tree specimens being preserved and protected, parallel to West Perimeter Road. The RPZ fenced area that was recently vandalized is now accessible to passersby, and is assumedly being used by homeless persons to access the RPZ area due to its dense forest of redwood and ash trees, plus the green-clad chain link fence, which makes this hidden zone ideal for sleeping and for use as a transit route to walk to and from retail stores in Cupertino and the existing homeless encampment on N. Wolfe Road. 4 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARRORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A LINE ITEM TREE TAG NUMBER DESCRIPTION NUMBERS NOTES / LOCATION AFFECTED REDWOODS ADJACENT TO 10356 NORWICH NEIGHBOR RESIDENCE: During WLCA's July 28, 2020 site visit, a reassessment of trees#592 through #602 was performed. The following are WLCA's rough estimated condition ratings for these 11 trees, as viewed from a poor vantage point from under the +/-JULY 3, canopies of the trees, standing just east of the trunks (the upper sections of the 2020 trees' canopies were not visible from my vantage point): Neighbor west Vallco trees Tree#592: 50% condition (Fair). of West adjacent to Tree#593: 40% condition (Poor). Perimeter Road 10356 Tree#594: 50% condition (Fair). residing at Norwich Tree#595: 50% condition (Fair). 10356 Norwich appear to be o 1A Road claims redwoods Tree#596: 20/o condition (Very Poor). This tree should probably be removed. that trees #592 to#602 adjacent to along West Tree#597: 0% condition (Dead). This tree should be removed. It has been dead his/her property Perimeter for a number of years, as noted in WLCA's Vallco property tree database. are "dying"on Road. Vallco property. Tree#598: +/- 30% to 50% condition (Poor to Fair). This tree was previously Requested rated as "Very Poor" (20% overall condition). It appears to be improving in terms information on of live twig density compared to previous years, likely due directly to the heavy the trees. irrigation we are providing to all of the redwoods on a year-round basis. Tree#599: 50% (Fair). Tree#600: 30% (Poor). Tree#601: 30% to 40% (Poor). Tree#602: 30% (Poor). ASH #103 DECAY/ LEAN SITUATION: WLCA noted on 7/28/2020 that the north side of the root crown of tree#103 was decayed, with approximately 12 inches of linear length as open cavity at grade Street tree elevation (see photos at end of this inspection report). #103 JULY, 2020 (evergreen The depth of the decay cavity(void) is not known, but it is highly likely that the ash entire north side of the root plate has been compromised in terms of structural Tree decay specimen), stability. 1 B situation noted at west side by Sand Hill of N. Wolfe LEAN: Property Co. Rd, where Staff the old AMC The tree appears (visually) to be leaning further off vertical than any other ash movie theatre specimen growing in this row of street trees along the west side of N. Wolfe was located. Road. The tree currently leans southeast over N. Wolfe Road, and does not appear to have righted itself to vertical with any new vertical growth. This suggests that the lean is a new lean, related to root plate instability brought on by decay of and failure of the north side of root crown. 5 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARRORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A LINE ITEM TREE TAG NUMBER DESCRIPTION NUMBERS NOTES / LOCATION AFFECTED (TREE#103 LEAN CONTINUED) Note that the north side of the root late where the decay is located is the"tension side" of this tree's lean, which means that the leaning mass is tensioned against (pulling against)the north side of the root plate. Given that the decay is on that tension side, this necessarily means that the tree's ability to maintain an upright position against gravity is compromised, since the lean side of a root crown/root plate is the side that is most crucial to maintain in good, healthy condition free of defects or decay'. WLCA installed two (2) nails into the uphill side of the tree lean, approximately 18 inches apart, on the lower trunk, in order to measure degrees of lean off from vertical during each monthly inspection report period. The degrees of lean were measured using a straight edge placed over the two nails, and a digital Nikon Forestry Pro hypsometer placed over the straight edge.WLCA shot ten (10) digital readings. The average number of lean degrees as read on the instrument screen was 74.4 degrees actual angle (15.6 degrees off-vertical), which can now be used as a BASELINE LEAN reading to compare with each future monthly reading, using the same equipment on the same nail heads. Given the high traffic occurring regularly on N. Wolfe Road at all hours, and the location of the subject tree adjacent to this roadway, leaning to the southeast directly toward the roadway, and the visible extent of decay, plus unknown additional extent of decay, WLCA suggests that we consider removal of the tree. Note that the decay does not appear to have been caused by any particular factor. There has not been construction activity over the root zone, and there is no coverage of wood chips over the root crown flare. Similarly, the irrigation provided by SHPCO to the trees at Vallco Property does not spray onto the trunk of any tree, and therefore remains only as water applied to the root zone itself. Therefore, the actual cause of the root crown decay at the north side of tree #103 is unverified as of the date of writing. IN-GROUND HOLLY OAKS ON SITE: These trees are currently still in place in the ground, and have not been boxed Tree up for transplant as of the date of writing. There is chain link RPZ type fencing transplantation protection around these five trees as of the date of writing, and additional planning. #69, 70, protection consisting of trunk buffer wraps around #97, 98, and #99. 1 97, 98, 99 Required There is currently no system set up to irrigate the three westmost oaks to transplants. be transplanted (trees#97, 98, 99).WLCA recommended in May, 2020 that SHPCO that the team provide the following: a. Berms: Pin down straw wattles in large, full perimeter circles around the trees, to force irrigation water to infiltrate directly down Dunster,Dr. Julian. 2017. Tree Risk Assessment Manual, 2"d Edition. International Society of Arboriculture publications(USA). 6 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARRORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A LINE ITEM TREE TAG NUMBER DESCRIPTION NUMBERS NOTES / LOCATION AFFECTED into the open soil root zones. b. Chips: Cover the open soil root zones with a layer approximately 4 inches thick, using chipper truck-type natural wood chips derived from Tree Tech company's pruning operations at Vallco. Lay wood chips down between the straw wattles and one foot out from the trunk edges of the trees. c. Irrigation: Hand-water the trees using a hose system, or bring in a water truck to provide high volumes of available water per each irrigation event. d. Frequency/Volume: Irrigate at a rate of approximately 2x a month, using 50 to 100 gallons of water per tree per each irrigation event. As of 7/28/2020, SHPCO has not been able to run irrigation piping to the three oaks to be transplanted from the SEARS AUTO area. SHPCO is providing irrigation to these three trees via hauling in water in a 55-gallon drum and dumping that water onto the open soil root zones of each of oaks#97, 98, and #99 on a 2x/month basis. Oaks#69 and #70 have piped heavy irrigation being applied from a T-line running off of N. Wolfe Road over-grade irrigation pipe systems. Trees#260, 261, and #262 are currently set up with over-grade high flow Tree irrigation via flex tubing, and trunk buffers have been wrapped around the trunks transplantation of each tree. Chain link fencing has also been erected around the trees. planning. #260, 261, 2 262, 414, #414, 415, and #416 have trunk buffer wraps, but no chain link fencing or piped Discretionary 415, 416 irrigation yet, as of the date of writing. They are being hand-watered. WLCA's transplants. soil moisture probe readings indicated 60% to 100/o relative soil moisture in open soil areas of the root zones. Mr. Bench, in his August, 2019 letter report, stated that a written set of transplanting specifications needs to be in hand at least 3 months prior to boxing Transplanting up trees for transplanting at Vallco. 3 Plan Report by WLCA WLCA actually prepared a Vallco transplanting specifications report back in 12/7/2018 12/7/2018, which was submitted to Craig Bacheller of RVA. This report can be used as a specification standard, or it can be updated as needed prior to use as the specification standard for our transplanting of existing site trees at Vallco. Temporary timer-activated Areas that now have active running temporary irrigation via over-grade PVC 4 irrigation (Various) piping and Salco flexible UV-resistant PVC include the following: system installation a. Stevens Creek Blvd. trees (evergreen ash trees along the landscape areas swale along the north side of the street), between North Wolfe Road and 7 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARRORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A LINE ITEM TREE TAG NUMBER DESCRIPTION NUMBERS NOTES / LOCATION AFFECTED West Perimeter Road. 3 bubblers per each tree, emitting up to '/4 gallon every 45 seconds, per my volumetric flow testing. As of June 25, 2020, timers are set for 4 days/week activation, 15 minutes of active flow, 2x/day, for a total of 2 hours of active flow per tree per week. b. North Wolfe Road trees, both west and east sides of street, between Stevens Creek Blvd. and freeway 280. (same 3-bubbler setup for each tree, and same timer-activated frequency and duration for water delivery as noted above). West side of N. Wolfe Road trees were noted to have roughly 70% to 100% relative soil moisture between Stevens Creek and the flyway, which has now been demolished as of April 15, 2020. Turf grass growth is seen in the planting areas surrounding the ash trees along the west side of N. Wolfe Road, indicating that excellent soil moisture is being provided by the over-grade irrigation system. As of 6/25/2020, the SHPCO team has spread wood chips as mulch skirts around these trees. The skirts are 2 feet in width, and offset approximately 1 foot from trunk edges to avoid moisture buildup on the trunk bark surfaces. The only area still not yet set up with active running irrigation as of December, 2019, is the east side of street, between the flyway and freeway 280 (i.e. the "Alexander Steakhouse trees"). This area is being heavily hand-watered by Sand Hill Property Co. Staffpersons. Soil moisture is at 70% to 100% as of 4/15/2020. As of June 25, 2020, the N. Wolfe Road median between the old flyway (demolished) and freeway 280 is now being irrigated by sprinkler heads, 3x/week, for roughly 20 minutes per activation period. Note that the TGIF trees are being irrigated using a Netafim emitter lines built into parallel rows running lengthwise along the relatively narrow open soil planting strip in this area. Soil moisture is 100%field capacity in this area. Street ash tree#265 in this area (tag number not verified), to be removed at a later time, was noted to have sustained a three foot long bark tear at 12 to 15 feet above grade, on a mainstem measuring 8 inches diameter. (The tag number of this tree was not visible due to the trunk buffer wraps). c. Sycamore island grouping of trees#260, 261, 262 on N.Wolfe Road (west side). Soil moisture could not be confirmed in this area. d. West Perimeter Road (WPR)trees: multiple rows of evergreen ash trees and coast redwood trees along the west side of the roadway, between Stevens Creek Blvd and the north end of the Vallco project near the Freeway 280 southbound off-ramp. As of 6/25/2020, soil moisture was approximate) 80% to 100% 8 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARRORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A LINE ITEM TREE TAG NUMBER DESCRIPTION NUMBERS NOTES / LOCATION AFFECTED throughout the root zones of the double row of trees along the entire west side of West Perimeter Road, and profuse new green ivy groundcover and lush green weed growth, indicating that over-grade irrigation being emitted to the trees' root systems has significantly boosted soil moisture. In April/May, 2020, the project team cut down the thousands of sprouts arising from the bases of the trees from the bud burls (lignotubers). The profuse growth of these sprouts over the last few months may be yet another indication that the trees are being well irrigated and that the root systems maintain relatively high soil moisture levels. In WLCA's experience, removal of basal sprouts often encourages coast redwood specimens to expend additional energy in pushing new twig and needle growth in the canopies, and WLCA expects this to occur at Vallco now that the basal sprouts have been removed. 2 As of 6/25/2020, the project team has gathered up Vallco site tree removal wood chips and spread them as mulch skirts around site trees along West Perimeter Road. The skirts are approximately 2 feet in width, and are offset from trunk edges roughly 1 horizontal foot to avoid moisture buildup on the trunk bark. The Lincoln moisture meter/probe used by WLCA to verify soil moisture at Vallco Property broke just prior to the 6/25/2020 site visit. WLCA therefore used the "scratch method" to remove dried soil surfaces in the trees' root zones, and physically feel the uppermost root zone zone for moisture determination. Root zones appeared to be at roughly the same relative soil moisture status as previously noted in past inspections (i.e. about 80% to 100% relative soil moisture). 6/25/2020 UPDATE ON REDWOODS#704 TO#724 (West Perimeter Road, East-West Section): Most of the trees in the group of redwoods#704 to#724 appeared to be in rapid decline due to soil moisture deficit directly related to the California drought situation, and were expected to die by 2020 or 2021 when re-assessed by WLCA a few years ago. However, given the regular heavy irrigation they have been receiving from the piped irrigation system installed by SHPCO, the trees are actually making a remarkable rebound in terms of growth vigor, as can be seen in the digital images from 6/25/2020 included in this inspection report. Original branches have desiccated and died, while new branches have arisen in profusion from the areas along the mainstems of most of these trees. Tree#711 is dead, but most of the remaining specimens along this east- west oriented row of redwoods on West Perimeter Road are currently exhibit improved TDE live current 2 Professional experience test trial, Sunnyvale,CA.Mature redwoods with basal sprouts retained, and mature redwoods with sprouts removed,were all tracked over a period of roughly 1 calendar year to note new twig extension lengths in the trees' canopies over time. Coast redwoods with basal sprouts removed appeared to achieve better canopy twig extension lengths over time. 9 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARRORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A LINE ITEM TREE TAG NUMBER DESCRIPTION NUMBERS NOTES / LOCATION AFFECTED UPDATE ON THE PROPOSED JOINT ELECTRICAL TRENCH AREA (I.E. NORTHWEST CORNER OF WEST PERIMETER ROAD): • The row of ash trees +/-#685 to#703 in the northwest corner of the Vallco site are leafing out better than previously expected, as of spring, 2020, due to consistent very heavy irrigation supplied by the Vallco team's over-grade irrigation system for more than one year. These trees are to be removed per plan, and are noted in "grey" color coding on the approved Vallco tree disposition plan sheet P0602B, from 2018. 1 did note on 6/25/2020 that ash#674 in the vicinity of past electrical vault conduit trenching root zone damage was exhibiting less than normal twig density and foliar density(see photos below). WLCA will continue to monitor this tree over time, for changes in stability and/or health (growth vigor). • Redwoods#611 through #621 were illegally pruned in the proposed joint trench area by a tree care company hired by one of the property owners living directly west of West Perimeter Road. The tree care company literally shaved off the entire west sides of the trees' canopies, from top of property boundary wall to the tops of the trees (as noted previously by WLCA). As can be seen in the digital images below in this 4/15/2020 report, the trees' regrowth to date since the illegal pruning has been pitiful at best, and the trees are expected to remain in a state of severe canopy damage with only minimal chance of recovery to their prior condition ratings. Decline of the trees' vigor(new growth) and/or a reduction in longevity in the landscape due directly to this illegal pruning is likely. e. East Perimeter Road (EPR)trees along the Apple Inc. property boundary are all now irrigated via flex tubing running along grade, as of October, 2019. Soil in the vicinity of the bubblers here is estimated to be 70-100%field capacity as of 6/25/2020, and visibly very moist. The trees appear to have better vigor(canopy twig and foliage growth)than in previous years, likely due to the heavy irrigation they have been receiving via the over-grade irrigation water supply system. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Author's Side Note: WLCA used a site-calibrated Lincoln soil moisture meter/probe today to test soil moisture of many of the streetside trees being protected and retained at the Vallco properties. Results indicated that the soil had generally 70% to 100% relative soil moisture in the vicinities of the high flow type flood bubblers which are activated multiple times per week along the ash and redwood tree root zones. 10 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARRORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A As of the date of writing, These Areas Are Being Hand-Watered 3x/week by Garden Hose Until a Bubbler System is Built Over-Grade: Areas being irrigated by a. Trees along the east side of N. Wolfe Road (Alexander Steakhouse 5 hand, 3x to (Various) trees)#435 to#441. Other ash trees in this row are not accessible by 4x/week during the hand-irrigation crew as of May, 2020, due to the presence of a Summer& Fall. homeless encampment and a portable toilet. b. Discretionary transplants#414, 415, 416. Areas with RPZ fencing now include all of the following: a. West perimeter road, west side of road (previously installed). b. Stevens Creek Blvd. between North Wolfe Road and West Perimeter Road (previously installed). Chain link Root c. North Wolfe Road, north-south oriented line of trees, (the westmost row 6 Protection Zone (Various) only), abutted up against the Bay Club parking lot. This is a new area of (RPZ) Fencing tree fencing protection. The City of Cupertino has apparently requested that we do not install protection along the sidewalk row of trees, in order to maintain the area with a natural, "non-industrial" appearance. The sidewalk along the west side of N. Wolfe Road is currently accessible by pedestrians almost the entire distance from Stevens Creek Blvd to the North end of the Vallco project. d. North Wolfe Road, both sides of road, between the flyway bridge and freeway 280 (i.e. Alexander Steakhouse trees, and TGIF trees). Areas with trunk buffer wraps and wood overlay now include all of the following: a. West Perimeter Road trees that are adjacent to the west side of the roadway. b. North Wolfe Road trees that are adjacent to the old Alexander Steak House (east side of road). Trunk Buffer c. North Wolfe Road trees that are adjacent to the old TGI Fridays 7 Wraps with (Various) restaurant(west side of road). Wood Board Overlay d. North Wolfe Road discretionary transplants 260, 261. e. North Wolfe Road street trees south of the flyway bridge (i.e. along the old AMC movie theatre and Dynasty restaurant area), west side of street, only as far south as the old Bay Club parking lot entrance. f. Required transplant oaks#97, 98, 99 at the southwest corner of the Vallco site. 11 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARRORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A The following tree areas have now been pruned by Tree Tech of San Jose, a tree service contractor, for horizontal and vertical roadway airspace clearance: a. (Early 2019): West Perimeter Road trees being retained along the west side of the road (pruned earlier in 2019). b. (August, 2019): East perimeter Road trees being retained along the east side of the road. c. (September, 2019): Stevens Creek Blvd. ash trees, the northmost row Pruning for overhanging the old Bay Club parking lot. Roadway& 8 Pathway (Various) d. (September, 2019): Trees along both sides of North Wolfe Road Airspace between Stevens Creek Blvd. and freeway 280. Clearance e. (October, 2019): Trees along the north side of Stevens Creek Blvd, both the row overhanging the Bay Club parking lot and the row overhanging the westbound lane along the north side of Stevens Creek Blvd. f. (October, 2019): The N. Wolfe Road median trees. g. (May, 2020): Live wood and foliage in the lower elevations of the canopies of redwood and ash tree specimens along West perimeter Road is being removed as an on-going process to clear the airspace of the north-south oriented walking path that extends north-south in orientation, parallel with the roadway. 12 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARRORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A During a site drive-through with Mr. Mike Rohde of SHPCO in September, 2019, the following areas were approved by WLCA as zones where chipper truck- derived natural wood chips can be placed over the open soil landscape as a mulch surface treatment, using natural wood chips from pruning operations on the Vallco property, in order to provide a moisture barrier that will enhance the look of the landscape, provide minor weed blocking functions, increase soil moisture retention, and force a greater percentage of irrigation water downward into the soil profile around existing trees being retained: Thickness approved: Up to 4 inches. After reviewing the speed of wood chip degeneration over time, WLCA may increase this thickness specification accordingly. As of October and November, 2019, wood chip mulch skirts are approximately 2 Mulching with to 3 feet in radius, from the root crowns of the trees outward. Wood Chips 9 Derived from (Various) a. (September, 2019): West side of North Wolfe Road. Pruning Operations by b. (September, 2019): Stevens Creek Blvd. trees, between North Wolfe Tree Tech. Road and West Perimeter Road. c. (September and October, 2019): East perimeter Road, between freeway 280 and Vallco Parkway. Along the east side of road only. Mulch here covers the complete open soil root zones of the trees (see images below in this report). WLCA suggested to Mr. Mike Rohde of SHPCO on 4/15/2020 that excess wood chips on the Vallco site could be utilized by spreading them out as a 4 inch thick layer over the bare soil root zones of redwood and ash specimens at the"bend point" along West Perimeter Road (i.e. between roughly trees #704 and #724). This would act to reduce evaporation of soil moisture from the trees' root zones. This spreading activity is on-going as of May, 2020. a. Ash tree#50 at the east end of the row of trees overhanging Stevens Creek Blvd recently declined (see photo below in this report). WLCA suggested that SHPCO prune out deadwood throughout the tree's canopy and monitor it to determine if it is still viable. The tree has now been pruned as of October, 2019. Trees to monitor b. Ash tree#673 at the "bend" in West Perimeter Road where utility for trenching occurred in 2019. This tree was noted elsewhere in this report 10 decline/death See right as a specimen in decline that exhibits less than normal current season's over time, or live twig density. simply remove outright. c. Ash tree#763 on West Perimeter Road. Decline in this tree was noted earlier in 2019 by WLCA. Tree Tech pruned the tree to reduce its height, and the tree is now"retrenching" with renewed vigorous sprout growth throughout the lower elevations (see photos below in this report). As of October, 2019, this tree is extending profuse new shoots and dense foliage as of October, 2019. 13 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A As of 4/15/2020 the tree exhibits a dense canopy of new shoot and foliage growth. As of 5/15/2020 SHPCO plans to prune out lower elevation branches to clear the airspace around this tree. d. Redwood #804 just northwest of#763 on West Perimeter Road is developing a large number of dead and dying scaffold limbs throughout the canopy. The tree may need to be removed outright at some point in the near future. As of 5/15/2020, the neighbor just west of this tree apparently pruned out a large number of the dead scaffold limbs without permission, and allowed those branches to fall into our Vallco property area where they are now laying in the pathway between the redwood tree row and the ash tree row (see photos at end of this report). e. Redwoods #628 and #668.West Perimeter Road. f. Various trees near the PG&E vault work recently completed along West Perimeter Road (see separate vault area table below). g. Redwood grove of trees#500, 501, and#502 ("standard trees")were noted in the past to be dead or almost dead in 2018. These trees may still represent a significant risk to persons driving, walking, or working around the East Perimeter Road area. Although they are already permitted for removal as of the date of writing, they are still standing in the landscape as of 1/24/2020, since this eastmost section of Vallco is scheduled for demolition after the west portions of the Vallco lands. I suggest removing them as soon as possible, per WLCA letter dated 3/2/2020. h. Per the WLCA letter dated 3/2/2020, three additional trees in the "east portion of Vallco" are also dead, and should be removed as soon as possible: • Giant sequoia#430 (street tree). • Giant sequoia#434(street tree). • Coast redwood #479 (standard tree). PG&E high (Various, voltage vault per the Vaults along the north section of West Perimeter Road were completely 11 along West Separate backfilled as of October, 2019. Perimeter Road below) The following is the table prepared by WLCA in January 2019 for the trees immediately surrounding the PG&E high voltage electrical underground upgrade work by Devcon that occurred in January 2019. The table was updated in April, 2019 based on WLCA's reassessment 4/26/19. Trees considered high risk or potentially high risk of failure and impact with ground targets are noted in the table with bold black and yellow highlight. 14 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A PG&E VAULT AREA TREES/WEST PERIMETER ROAD Tree Tag Actual Root Plate Number Radius Remaining Overall Condition Rating (Measured in Feet,on WLCA Suggests Removal of Tree (South to (updates) Trench Face or Vault North) Excavation Side) 729 10 (feet) 727 8 724 6 10% Very Poor Potential removal 722 6 10% Very Poor Potential removal 721 6 10% Very Poor Potential removal 716 4 35% Poor Potential removal 714 3 15% Very Poor Potential removal 713 4 50% Fair 712 8 48% Poor 711 8 0% DEAD Suggest removal due to lack of vigor 710 8 50% Fair 708 6 25% Very Poor Potential removal 707 6 10%Very Poor Suggest removal due to lack of vigor 706 6 25% Very Poor Potential removal 734 (ash) 4 Potential removal. Monitor for decline or instability. 735 (ash) 4 Potential removal. Monitor for decline or instability. 736 (ash) 5 Potential removal. Monitor for decline. 737 (ash) 6 Potential removal. Monitor for decline. 738 (ash) 6 Potential removal. Monitor for decline. 739 (ash) 3 Potential removal. Monitor for decline or instability. 673 _______ Very Poor live twig density/extension as of Monitor for continued decline. 6/25/2020. Very Poor. PGE excavation work encroached to within 1 foot of the root zone, within the I suggest we remove the tree at 674 (ash) 1 Critical Root Zone (CRZ), possibly resulting in this time for loss of roughly 30 to 40% of the original root safety purposes. system. I suggest removal of this tree for safety purposes. 15 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARRORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A Tree Tag Actual Root Plate Number Radius Remaining Overall Condition Rating (Measured in Feet,on WLCA Suggests Removal of Tree (South to Trench Face or Vault (updates) North) Excavation Side) 65% Fair. Nice large redwood specimen of 30 inches diameter. Total root loss of as much as 20% or more, and recent trenching occurred within the 15 foot radius (Critical Root Zone) in 651 6-7 one quadrant of the root zone. Expect good survival, and little or no loss of stability, since excavation occurred only in the northeast section of the tree's root zone, and did not extend south of the trunk. 38% Poor. Tree exhibits extensive needle dieback 650 6-7 that is not related to the recent PGE vault excavation work within the east side of the tree's root zone. 649 7 50% Fair 648 10 30% Poor. Tree suppressed in shade of surrounding larger specimens. 65% Fair. Nice specimen of large proportions with 32 inch diameter trunk situated next to the Devcon Construction lockable chain link gate at the north end of Demolition Zone 1A. Critical Root Zone is 16 feet radius. Recent 647 8 to 10 feet trenching destroyed roots in the northmost half of this CRZ (i.e. within 8 to 10 feet of the trunk edge). Some possible loss of tree stability. Monitor tree for symptoms of decline or instability(e.g. soil cracking, trunk lean off from vertical, loss of vigor expressed as needle dieback, etc.). 646 7 40% Poor Suggest root crown excavation (RCX) using hand tools to remove excess soil piled over the buttress 645 6 to 7 feet 40% Poor root flares. This tree actually appears to be getting strangled by roots extending from ash tree #680 directly east from #645. Suggest remove tree for safety purposes. Tree is at southeast corner of the new north-south 678 (ash) 1 foot High Risk oriented vault excavation area. As of June 2020, this tree still remains in the landscape with 16 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A Tree Tag Actual Root Plate Number Radius Remaining Overall Condition Rating (Measured in Feet,on WLCA Suggests Removal of Tree (South to Trench Face or Vault (updates) North) Excavation Side) 1 foot of radial root extension between the vault excavation face and the trunk edge, and exhibits very poor live twig density and extension. WLCA recommends removal of the tree. 679 (ash) 0 feet High Risk (Removed as of 2019). Potential removal for safety 680 (ash) 2 feet Possible High Risk purposes due to trench cut at 2 feet offset from buttress root edges. Remove now, or monitor. Digital Images Archived by WLCA/ July 28, 2020 _ } I k s r \ Y The West Perimeter Road RPZ protection zone is being Looking north along the ash trees at West Perimeter kept relatively clean and tidy, with wood chip skirts laid Road. The live twig density of the ash trees in this row is around each tree, irrigation in good repair, lower sprouts probably the best it has been in years, even with the removed to grade periodically, and dead limbs removed or drought condition we are still in. The explanation for this is cast aside to clear the pathway. This area is locked, and I that our regular heavy irrigation is keeping the root have not seen any recent evidence of break-ins or other systems of the trees moist year round, which allows them homeless use of the walkway. The prior break-in/damage to maintain good vigor. to the gate was repaired, and the locked gate at the south end is functional. 17 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison AL CONSULTING ARB4R15T ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A 5 Looking southwest at a row of ash and redwood specimens along West Perimeter Road. Center of image: redwood #597 in "dead" condition, which is likely the tree that the 10356 Norwich neighbor was referring to in her request for information. Tree#596 in very poor overall condition is shown at the extreme right- hand ed a of the image. Ash#103, looking north along N. Wolfe Rd. Ash #103 is Closeup view of the north side of the root crown of ash the 2nd tree from the foreground, and is shown leaning #103. The decay hollow(void) is at least 12 inches length, southeast into the roadway further"off vertical" than all of and of unknown depth. The decay void appears to the other remaining ash specimens in this row of street encompass the entire root crown far down below grade trees. elevation. The decay is located on the tension side of the tree's root system (i.e. the "uphill side of the lean"), which is the side most crucial in terms of maintaining upright stability. 18 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir�yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARRORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A _ &ss r# (Blank) x .off Ash#103 looking eastward toward N. Wolfe Road. Note the lean southeastward (toward the right side of image). The two (2) monitoring nails I installed on the tree are located along the left side of the lower trunk (north side or "tension side"of the lean). I will be recording the angle of trunk lean each month using those two nails, in order to determine if there is any significant change of lean angle. Typically, a change of 1.0 degree is considered alarming, though each situation has to be assessed on a case by case basis. From the author's standpoint, this tree should be actually considered for removal at this time for safety purposes. 19 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com Walter Levison CONSULTING ARBORIST ISA Tree Risk Assessment Qualified ASCA Registered Consulting Arborist#401 ISA Certified Arborist#WE-3172A Assumptions and Limiting Conditions Any legal description provided to the consultant/appraiser is assumed to be correct.Any titles and ownership to any property are assumed to be good and marketable. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character.Any and all property is appraised and evaluated as through free and clean,under responsible ownership and competent management. It is assumed that any property is not in violation of any applicable codes,ordinance,statutes,or other government regulations. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible; however,the consultant/appraiser can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. The consultant/appraiser shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made,including payment of an additional fee for such services as described in the fee schedule and contract of engagement. Unless required by law otherwise,the possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any other purpose by any other than the person to whom it is addressed,without the prior expressed written or verbal consent of the consultant/appraiser. Unless required by law otherwise,neither all nor any part of the contents of this report,nor copy thereof,shall be conveyed by anyone, including the client,to the public through advertising, public relations, news,sales,or other media,without the prior expressed conclusions, identity of the consultant/appraiser,or any reference to any professional society or institute or to any initiated designation conferred upon the consultant/appraiser as stated in his qualifications. This report and any values expressed herein represent the opinion of the consultant/appraiser,and the consultant's/appraiser's fee is in no way contingent upon the reporting of a specified value,a stipulated result,the occurrence of a subsequent event, nor upon any finding to be reported. Sketches,drawings,and photographs in this report, being intended for visual aids,are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering or architectural reports or surveys unless expressed otherwise.The reproduction of any information generated by engineers,architects, or other consultants on any sketches,drawings,or photographs is for the express purpose of coordination and ease of reference only. Inclusion of said information on any drawings or other documents does not constitute a representation by Walter Levison to the sufficiency or accuracy of said information. Unless expressed otherwise: information contained in this report covers only those items that were examined and reflects the conditions of those items at the time of inspection;the inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible items without dissection,excavation, probing,or coring. There is no warranty or guarantee,expressed or implied,that problems or deficiencies of the plants or property in question may not arise in the future. Loss or alteration of any part of this report invalidates the entire report. Arborist Disclosure Statement: Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge,training,and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees,and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees.Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist,or to seek additional advice. Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree.Tree are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand.Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground.Arborist cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances,or for a specified period of time. Likewise, remedial treatments, like any medicine,cannot be guaranteed. Treatment, pruning,and removal of trees may involve considerations beyond the scope of the arborist's services such as property boundaries, property ownership,site lines,disputes between neighbors,and other issues.Arborists cannot take such considerations into account unless complete and accurate information is disclosed to the arborist.An arborist should then be expected to reasonably rely upon the completeness and accuracy of the information provided. Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled.To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk.The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate the trees. Certification I hereby certify that all the statements of fact in this report are true,complete,and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief,and are made in good faith. Walter Levisan cz;ggWE-3177A VNELevis�on, t onsultant , nsu tang rborist MACWW,edwa� run 2= Attached: Mrrw%0 Assassffw#QWNW MAM2a 1. Tree Map (OLIN), Full Site (Latest Update: May, 2020) 2. Tree Data Table (WLCA) (Latest Update: 7/28/2020) Intamadonal5ocWyofAMMMIM 20 of 20 Walter Levison©2020 All Rights Reserved Registered Member,American Society of Consulting Arborists and Member of the International Society of Arboriculture Cell(415)203-0990 Email walterslevisonir(a)yahoo.com 1 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 10 1 — i LEGEND i" APPLE - - PROPERTY LINE (NOT IN SCOPE) - - PROPERTY LINE AFTER DEDICATION i / o — GARAGE EXTENTS STRUCTURE TOWN CENTER r-----—1 STRUCTURE ABOVE A L-----J TAG# ❑ EXISTING STANDARD TREE TO REMAIN 334 OWNER-VALLCO PROPERTY OWNER LLC. 965 PAGE MILL ROAD, PALO ALTO,CA 94304 TAG# T.650-344-1500 / %/ 0EXISTING STANDARD TREE TO BE REMOVED 374 ARCHITECTURE-RAFAEL VINOLY ARCHITECTS 50 VANDAM STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10013 1 i T.212-924-5060 TAG# EXISTING TREE 11 ARCHITECTURE-RAFAEL VINOLY ARCHITECTS TO BE TRANSPLANTED 1033 N.WOLFE ROAD,CUPERTINO,CA 95014 �C/��,`� T.408-627-7090 TAG# �Q C co 0D o> (N � M '1 DEVELOPMENT TREE TO BE REMOVED 90 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE OLIN PARTNERSHIP LTD. "' I ci 04 Lo `9 `'' , `�".'I c' ,f�,' "' "' co ;� " "' "' `' `o `0 'o °° �' 1 1 ? 150 S, INDEPENDENCE MALL W.SUITE 1123, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106 Lo N� LL — ��._.l ? J >� �.:=� --•— . — 0[ 77-77-77--a TAG# T.214-440 0030 \ 1 1 \f ! 1 1 1 l My EXISTING STREET TREE TO REMAIN 113 CIVIL-SANDIS CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS, INC. Ncli V ��r T E T )N � � 1700 S.WINCHESTER BLVD,SUITE 200, CAMPBELL,CA 95008 — N M y v r` 0 rn o ,n N _� .a M co m o �i n o o TAG# co - x T.408-636 0900 co O O O M M M V CS) 0D co� M\ M X M M �i M `�' x�� x \ X y h \ f i to �) \ EXISTING STREET TREE TO BE REMOVED 73 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ARUP NORTH AMERICA, LTD. r M� M M c"2 M O 1� O ,T� .�� m coct. CO M M �t o r (v� M x � >r., �,_�� �.. _ _ ® I � 560 MISSION STREET,SUITE 700,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94105 lam �(x — ( x III T.415-957 9445 X X M LCJ M I • 6j' '� 0-) co I II o TOTAL TREE 995 04_ t t N v� 1 k LIGHTING -ONE LUX STUDIO �j' N a, o o Lo j `r 158 WEST 29TH STREET, 10TH FLOOR, NEW YORK, NY 10001 C14fo co x B r x "' T.212-201 5790 i coM — M x O o FOR DETAILS OF EXISTING TREE CONDITIONS,SEE ARBORIST REPORT, SIGNAGE-EX:IT / x (�M M X X BLOCK 1 1 DATED JUNE 14,2019,PREPARED BY WALTER LEVISON,CONSULTING 1617 JFK BLVD, SUITE 1665, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 N N 4JJ Lo x �, I ARBORIST(WLCA). T.215-561-1950 M x �, M _ I I I PARKING ENGINEERING-WATRY DESIGN, INC. x 127I 2099 GATEWAY PLACE, SUITE 550,SAN JOSE,CA 95110 X X �� x T.408 392-7900 M o MLo 1128 vi cl)— \ X ---- o — 129 �, STREET ~ 0 0 —�_ o NOT IN SCOPE 0 i t M I o 1130''' o N x 1 1 El M _ ~ co )( N � N M 0 co ❑ LL. LU� M�Lu < X x � � co co o w � 11a 00 a cl) Lu El El co ui BLOCK 10 M N ❑❑ ❑ c BLOCK 9 I I j / et N� M co M M x , ❑ El El I I J w ❑ ❑ Q X ❑❑❑❑ ❑ > El 1131 000��00El � HYATT HOTEL �0�000��0 co \ o O O N r� M 6) o 0 0 NOT IN SCOPE �_ r � o p p ( ) _ , rn o-v - o -`� -� �� �- can o STREET MAdlbk V V 3,) o 0 0 f?) )) x i M 1132 ® • _____ M N O O CD N II Lo N x 7) BLOCK 8 BLOCK 7 ~ 133 Lu D A 0 U-, U \ x v 0 o 4 v �_ NV X 0 CO W M V • I I 1 1 O V M X O � ww O N V � CD O N V x Lo CO CO M V CD f� r- r- � icc • � � \ X c c < < < c r ' �, _�, _ _ Lo ,� o �, �, PROPERTY LINE it c c c c c c c It 0 PROPERTY LINE rn 0 �� �e M o AFTER DEDICATION 0 0 0 0 0. � ......... --N �-' -- -__ -- - -___ -_ o, O o WOLFE ROAD 0 c GARAGE EXTENTS o o o~N A o'' • o X\ 1 J \\ = o 0 ----_- ----_-- N WOLFE ROAD o o --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _ _ _ _ o o .__. __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ o 0 0 -_-- (V CV O o o W N N N r iF o '.. O M N M f0-_.--...___. 1 I I lA M Cfl --__-------- --------- --------- --------- ---------0 0 c r __ r -__ r___ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ --------- o. ---- __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ --- o C^ �7-► V M _- OD ti coCO (p O M o r i o o O O O O � _ lA tq --.--- -- - N cn -- Uc cXJ M N M M M r� O Ncli N► o x ) ) IIII M N N - N N N N M N _ o N N N \ - • • :u�� ----_ N �� � N N � � l Iy 1 1. _ M � - '; o'� N X � x O 5 -,��"�.'�' t:4�' � � I I - X = - a __ _ 0 0 0 0 � co N o 0 PROPERT IN _ (E '`[ EDICA 10\ l' 11 1 ( L / cam - co K �I M \ — 4 �- 1 I 4 � — r. — -- � — — — — — — ��� — — — — — — — � 0 r` � o � GARAGE EXTENTS — — • .. a ,, — — — — — — — N E I+�► _ \ N M O 6�N N - 2 co LC') / N N N N I`N M -� Fo' x x x O� N O 1 1 M x e-- N 6 f J�/CV Il Il � ----- N N i ACV N 1 1 �,'..n r M M M M F► � x p X O r r• i X- r r r r r r r X Mcy) N x N N r J 0 x M • r . �• / N N ` W o L~L.I V cfl o H W rn W \ N M .O .O rO N r\/ o N W 0 0 x r- w X_ co N W M M (O O l\ V N � � �� O x CO (\J) 6 x Wo o f co BLOCK 6 N X x BLOCK 5 LBLOCK 4 x x x X X r r ',. M X. O M 00 CD OM M X o N N CO BLOCK 4 �� I G: O N O M M (p M ti O X M X X ([)N N I_l lI_ 1 1 1 ® X Cfl• 0� M O x O X 1 1 _ _ 1 1 �� _ n NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �I M e� � � I I n 1 _ N �� I O Ji..... � � co ^ M0 M O X N ������������������������ Lf) r n r❑ O (LOD r M X n DISCLAIMER N N N c� %(o y/ o o M � r x n THE ARCHITECT I ENGINEER SHALL HAVE NO RESPONSIBILITY ----. --- �J c� c$ o o c$ r c- r---- --------- r a$ 1 X X x r c$ c� o 0 0 o o o o 0 o M N c2 -- c>g c>g w o 0 FOR ANY E o �' o 0 ao FROM OR RELATING ING T00 ANY OUSE OF THGS DOCUMENT FOR ANY o �, STREET C 0 0 ► rk) 8) o �) ►' ', o T T �i O O i x 00000 o T co M w PURPOSE OTHER THAN ITS INTENDED PURPOSE ON THIS • O co PROJECT. THIS DOCUMENT IS TO BE CONSIDERED IN 000M � CONJUNCTION WITH ALL RELATED DOCUMENTATION.ANY 1 -� «, I DISCREPANCIES IDENTIFIED IN THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE CN REPORTED IMMEDIATELY TO THE ARCHITECT BEFORE F ° x 0 ( M M PROCEEDING. CONTRACTORS MUST VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS r °° co �a 1 "' L� PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH ANY WORK.ONLY FIGURED w � x r 00 (x\ DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE USED FOR VERIFICATION. WOLFE PROPERTIES L O ! r N NOT IN SCOPE) I w N BLOCK 3 W , W. BLOCK 2 w �� BLOCK 2 M �IT) W W W N M _rn r x o ) F- Cn cn rn rn x h. W O N T) �X L LLJr � M m SB-35 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION o 0 x p N r X _ _ :�- 1 -� 1 �- 1 �o a �a �o N N N N coce) cli M N - -- X� V N O 00 .0 ^ co CO - N❑ ❑ ❑ -� • x x x N N M N M M x 00 M M co r r N N r x x x O x N N r r r ^� X �� r X r r 0 �/ Jae x x :,` i� o o .�<2 M STREET B (r> ct o o ��ct cC — o o cc N w L.L., NO �= W x � x '. x �pOD � � _. v`"�� 1 X 1 _Jl X I x � � _ o -------- �-_ ____ ____ O ____ ......... ____ o o ____ __-__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ ___ ...... .....___- - ____-_ --_. ____ 0 0 _ � v i M $) )'D o 91) O &) 4 \ - — m _ r a > REV DESCRIPTION DATE C= N 8 i o o � x � N CD / co M W O OD co co M ?�- 0D r- c f� N M n X I f v .. v r \ f \ �r co ;, J n REV-0 SB 35 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION 03127/2018 ' AA d 't 1 X \ x I x I X 1 X I (X 1 (x 1 Y f \ 1 /�\ � 1 - � 0 r w lw r n REV-1 SB 35 APPLICATION REVISIONS 08/06/2018 REV-2 SB-35 APPLICATION CONFORM SET 09/15/2018 N,VMN NCr)�tnCp f�00 6)O�NM (p C0 MO iT O M W r j n t`I�I�f� � ����� I�CDCD DODO �'VMV�fJ(01�0o6)Or coVIfJCOI�ODOOrN �lC)(Cj r�0o0�0 �(OI�0o00rN lfJ CO Mal _ ,.- M V M n M MMM Cf') (f') to L!')(f')(f')Cf') �f')tntn(f')(f') coM00 a0 0o0o IT O 6)6�06)6�6)6)00 OOOOOOOrrr O•-N MV,.fl cD f�M r O Cf')L!')(f')tntn(f')(f') lf�Cf')(f')�Cf')�tnCOCO COCO(OCOCOCO(OCOCOCO (OCOCO co(OCOC'4 CO CVNCVNNMMM M M MM V•7V V�tV V VV 00 r1)rNCO"T �cor- 0D 6�OGNM V�(D~a00 ��CO(OCOCO(O(OCOCO (O Co CO CO CO (O CO(OCO CO CocoLnLn Lo Locococo-Z Co CO(O(O(O CO(O CCi CO CO(OCO COCO COM (O��r- �� OLIJ I H N CN CIO C) 114 o Cn p o Z 0 o Z. D, co w BLOCK 1 113 I LLl (n 11 o �\� 112 X o I 10 ❑ 9 0 0 LoC co J r� Low ® 7 ❑1220 f �, ° N.WOLFE ROAD M 01219 © 0 J M Y r w �1217 0I w Z - - 1 w N °O rn O 1216 o O r ti CO Lc") M (v O - O M V M co M M M M M M M M N r - 61 O M ^ �_._- --.CO CD r- `- N X M x X r N x X x xx x x X ❑0 X x X1215 x x j �o rn KEY PLAN AND NORTH ARROW M -� 11 � LLI N 04 04 r X o L STREET A(PERIMETER RD.) �r co �, i; 0 ti -___________-_ -------------_________________.__.--------_---_--- x X ARCHITECTS PROJECT NUMBER 708011 v r- r co o r- r� r_ (r> r� «' o v v w rx _:'� -- I n Y 1 1 I( 1 I i ! 11 1 f 1 ( 1 ( �r N /� 1 — — — — ----------L � ( C\`�_�\'w �C _ (\ PROJECT PHASE: SB 35 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION } ( f ( f •( •l 1K ( ( ( I I 11 1 • 1 r'I1 1 t l I I I} 1 1 'Tl ) I l X—• I l I ) ( I— I I I T I 1 1 11 1 1 11 I U I I - v N N�ti_ IF THIS DRAWING IS NOT 36"x48"IT IS A REDUCED PRINT; ( — i w n CN REFER TO GRAPHIC SCALE r 6)O V r-r-r-OD 6)O-VM VCO r-0D6� M Vr.(JC01�0D6)Or NMV �(OI�00 rN M��(OI�aD OrNM�Y �(OI�OD OrN MVIfXO r` O� OrN M��(fll� 6�Or(v MV�(DI� 6) r CO CO CO r NM �� ���� �a000 0o 0oca 00000o O o-'mm6)6�000 000 0000 cD rrrrrr N(VCVCVCV CVNCVCV MMM MMMC`'M OM M VVV�VVVV VLoCoLo LOLOLOLOUl � M co � n tititi ti titi ti��ti��MaO 0D0DOD ODODODO0 Oo ODO0 000000000000 OoODODODOo 00000000 0D0D0D 00000000 00 M MMM o0 o0MMM MpaDM MMMMoO coaD n 0 32' 64' 128' 192' SCALE: 1/64"=1'-0" EAST WEST BANK DE NZA PROPER S ( OT IN SCO E) TREE DISPOSITION PLAN VALLGO rFn OT IN SCOPE O SHEET TITLE: O CD P � 0602B LLL SHEET NUMBER: I © 2018 RAFAEL VINOLY ARCHITECTS PCI Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 — @ o c — c cw a E E'c F Scientific Name L X o= q+ v m e @ y WLCA Notea from IpIatetl Overall Condlllon o& $o y r c —'o u Common Name _ .8 o n_ c - n m w m - a Ratings&NOTES 2017 m E ur pu m c n _ _ _ _ _ _ £. o (Genoa,apooie.) a: m e,ii w c — c ° — u u Spring 2015 Survey _ g u d _ _ c d m'e— ONWARD m¢G . m .a me as ra gg xc c SEo = � 2 2 2 2 .Ed Za�'u4 ap S{{ e@'9 n@ 2 02 �•° E o X 13.0 13.0 Shamel..h Fraxlnua hdal M. M. poor ,.or 6 11 X Removed as of Jan,2020. 2 X 10.9 10.9 ShamelaaM1 Fraxlnua hdal 2SQ0 s-s 40%poor mad... 7 Removedasof Jan,2020. 3 X 13.8 -a ShamelaaM1 Fraxlnua hdal 3-s 60145 50%fair mad... Removedasof Jan,2020. 4 X 16.6 16.6 ShamelaaM1 Fraxlnua hdal 3-0 55/60 57%fair mad... Removetl as of Jan,M20. 5 X 22.0 ShamelaaM1 Fraxlnua hdal —s 7-0 fib%fair good 12 Removedasof Jan,2020. 6 13.3 ShamelaaM1 Fraxlnua uh- 3-15 sMs 43%poor mad.-- Removed as of Jan,Md. Monterey pine PM-mdhao 55/30 65165 65%fair mad.-- Removedasof Jan,2020. Tree.pp—to be d-miag in N.W.entivrelght live twig—at,tlue to 8 X Me Me Shamel asM1 Fnxinua uhdei SSYJO 70/60 64%fair motlerate W reduction pinning c ro prolonged Bay Al.tlugM onditians.Current condition is approximately 40%or"poor'. 9 X 26.2 26.2 Shamel ash Fm-..uhdei 55/40 Bolso 55%fair poor to motl OR N.W.endweight rad,c-pinning Tree appears to be decllning In Ilve bola tlensity due to 10 27.0 27.0 Shamel ash F m..uh" smo Bolso 55%fair poor tomod N prolonged Bay=a d..ght and U....Current condition Is capproximately 40%or"poor". Tree appears to be decllning In Ilve twig d...Ry duo to 11 X 28.8 28.8 Shamel ash Fnxinua uh" smo 60160 60%fair mo,k— s OR prolonged Bay Area tlrougM ontlltlons.Current condition Is capproximately 37%or"poor". e apPeare o mngm live twig tlenaity tlue to prolonged Bay Area tlrougM 12 20.2 20.2 Shamel ash Fnxinua uh" sms 55/50 53%fair poor to motl E antlid-.Current...ditionic c approximately 25%or I., Poor'.Trees in very poor onditian are generally Tree appears to be decllning In U.twig tlenaity due to 13 X 22.2 22.2 Shamel ash F inua uhdei —s 60/50 55%fair poor to motl S prolonged BayAmad1ou9M ontlltlons.Current condition Is capproximately 37%or"poor". 1 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 Ea o'8'Y 8 crY �p E — $ c• ~n —'c n r Common Name Scientific Nm (G--apea) ey atngs conditio 9 » o SNOTE3201T m sadng zwss.a 2 ONWARD t4 24.7 24.7 ShamelasM1 FreXlnus AM Tree appear to be decliran9M 60/28 60/60 60Y.Pair motlante N live twig tlenaity tlue to prolonged Bay Area tlrought wnditiana.Current condition i. approximately 46%or"poor". 15 24.6 24.6 Shamel ash F.I—uhdN 60/30 60/45 SSX fa'v motlrate N 16 20.6 20.6 Shamel aeM1 Faxlnus uhdN Tree appears to be declining in SSYdo 5W55 55%fair nn d.b IN live twig tlensity d—e prolonged Bay Area tlrought aditwns.Current ntlition m appnximately co 42%or"poor•'. 17 17.7 17.7 Tree appears to be d-inin g in ShamelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdN 45/25 0/0 O%aead(not live twig tlensity tlueW verified) prolonged Bay Area drought ondltia s.Curent contlition is capproX'lmately 35%or fS 91.6 91.6 Shamel a6M1 Fazlnus uhdN Tree appears to be tleclining in 60/30 6S/98 58X Pair motlente IN OR 10 to 12 live twig tlensity tlue to prolonged Bay Area tlrought ontlitians.Currentcondition is aapproximately 48%ar 18 18.2 18.2 Shamel aah Fazlnus uhdN Tree appears to be tleclining in 45/25 60/50 55%fair nn d.b S live We tlenaity tlue to protongetl Bay Area tlrought onditi.ns.Current contlition m aapproximately 35%or"poor". 20 21.5 Z1.5 Shamel aah Fraxlnus uhdN SOpS 55/55 SSX fair poor to motl 21 17.0 17.0 Shamel aah Fraxlnus uhdN 35/20 50/60 SSX fair moMrate S OR m3 32.3 ShamelasM1 F—us uhdW SSMO 75/65 70%Sootl good NE 23 24.5 24.5 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhM Tn9appean to be tleclining in SSfdo 65/40 50%fair Mo nft S 30 OR live twig tlensity tlue to prolonged Bay Area tlrought onditiane.Current contlition is aaP1,1- ately 45%or"poor'. 29.7 26,7 Shl,Nash FI-b—uhtlN 53/90 6S/30 60%fair moderate N GR 25 X 20.7 20.7 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhdN Tree appear to he declining in 50/3o SS/95 SOX hir moMrate SE l0 roue GR live twig tlensity tlue to oprndolonged Bay Area tlrought mana.carrenl can did..is a approximatoly 50%or Pair-. 26 X 20.2 20.2 Tree ea T appr to be tleclining in Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhdN 3505 50/50 sp%yh matlerata N live twig tlensity tlue to r� prolonged Bay Ana tlrought ontli[ians.Current contlition is aapproximately 45%or"poor'. 2 Of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`m Eg oB S oc _ t $ m E E-6 F Scientific Name L X o= i 9 m- q+ v m e E y WLCA Notes from Uptlatetl Overall Condition m 8 $c y¢ 1=c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ - c n m g - Ratings&NOTES 2017 sa E„ y a c c c c c c _m„ $m (Genoa,ajaschm) a: ¢ m u d mow c d o - c c g c E _ u Spring 2015 Survey m °�' miG $§$ m m �a gm as qa .Fa°w ppp - ns `off dEw ° ,�i ._ ONWARD dEE$ = E'er 2 2 2 2 2 2 ua 6Z'Ee go .a ids �2.� n 2 °'2 ¢cgawnm a$ �'c.A 5 3E c as z Tree was slgnMcantly damaged by a City-hired contractor performing directional bore and other electrical utility related work along Stevens Creek Blvd In June and July,2019.The 27 1( 25.8 25.8 Shem as Fi al h Mcs uh del MIS 66160 57%fair moderate 8 —how.carred the lower trunk of thls tree(see Image Iu WLCA'.July,2019 Inspection report).However,the tree Is slated for removal anyway per the Veil-project team has disposition sheet. Tree appears to be declining In live Wild-sity due to 28 36.9 36.9 Shamel ash F inns uh" 60140 75145 60%fair good N GR prolonged Bay=a drought contllllon..Current condition Is approximately 45%or"poor". Tree appears to be declining In live Will density tlue to 29 32.3 32.3 Shamel ash F inns uh" sons 70150 60%fair good S GR prolonged Bay Area drought condition Current condition Is approximately 50%or"fair". 30 29.5 29.5 Shamel ash Frosrume uh" 50140 60156 59%fair good NE Tree appears to be declining In live twig density due to prolklonged Bay Area drought ° ontlons.Current condition Is 31 It6.3 6.3 Shamel an FradmsuhdW 18110 40YJ0 35%puor moderate S BRC Slanted approzlmately 25%or"very poor".Trees In very poor overall condition are generally considered ant carnlidees for annoval from the landscape, since oh'bill to recover to 32 17.9 17.9 Shamel ash F—nat uh" ISMS 60140 50%fair moderate N Tree appears to be declining In live twig tlenslty tlue to 33 26.0 26.0 Shamel ash F tons uh" ISMS 60150 57%fair moderate GR Dlamets—thusted. prolonged Bay Area tlrougM ontll[lons.Cu rrent condition Is °approzlmately 40%or"poor". Tree appears to be declining In Tree oM of leaf. live twig tlenslty due to 34 24.0 24.0 Shamel ash Formes uh" Ons 50140 45%poor T S 9 Condition prolonged Bay Area tlrouaM .surround. ontll[lons.Current condition Is capproximately 40%or"poor". 35 23.3 23.3 Shamel ash Formes uh" ISMS 60/55 57%fair moderate N 36 1( 26.6 26.6 Shamel ash Formes uh" 5W46 65160 63%fair moderate 37 X 32.9 32.9 Shamel ash Formes uh" sons 70160 65%fair good N 3 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 updated Oeeran condition a E y c S c .m c n WLCA Noted from Ratings&NOTES 2017 o ' u Comm on Name yy id c u c — m.. g ec E u g 8 ._ Spring 2015 Survey ONWARD o q—`n�w (Genus,species) g e' w a W w W c f eE §¢'rc A°wn aS 2 2 2 2 2 2 38 X 18.2 18.2 Shemelash Fraxlnus uhdN So/25 65/50 S6X fair mo4inete 8 nee appem h be aaegmng h gee twig aenairy aue h GR Diameter estimamtl. prolonged Bay Area tlrought FreYlnus uhdW 35/90 6S/50 STX fair good N �3_g 23.0 ShemetaM conditions.Cunenl condition is 39 X approzimafely 45%or"poor'. Tree appears to be tleclining in live twig aenairy due to 25 OR op^olonged Bay Area tlrought 00 X 28.2 20.2 Shemelash Fraxlnus uhM SW45 60/45 52%h mo derate oderate S aifiane.Current condition is capprozimately 35%or q1 183 10.3 Shemelash Fraxlnus uhM 50/20 60/50 M%hir mo4ende NE Tree appem to be declining in live twig aenairy aue to 28%vary 8 S op^olonged Bay Area aro.gM 42 6.5 6.5 Shemelash FraXlnus uhM 20/8 30/25 pony poor dit ng:Current cantlitionm cappro [ely 35%or"poar". qy 290 24.0 Shamel aeh Fraxlnus uhtlN 55/ig 65/60 63%hir good N OR Diameter estimated. qq 90.7 90.7 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uh" SM5 65/45 M%hir good 8 OR Tree appears to be declining in lice twig aenairy due to prolongetl Bay Area tlrought 45 180 180 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhdef mo W50 SOX hir poor W mod N contlitione.Current condition is appro din-tely 90%or"poor". 96 905 30.5 Shamel ash Frazlnus uhtlN SSY35 65/95 SSX hir good S OR 7.9 Diametertimated. 97 26.0 26.0 Shamel ash Frazlnus uh" 35Y30 70/60 67%hir good N Tree ppee.to be tleclining in live twig density tlue to ST%hir mod to good 8 OR op^olonged Be,Area tlrought 98 Sig 31.6 Shamel ash Fre,,d.-on" W30 60155 ditiona.Current cantlition is capprozimately 35%or"poor". qg 295 24.5 Shemelash FYezlnus uAdw 55/25 55/55 55%hir moderate N Tree appears to be declining in live twig density due to p^ologetl Bay Area tlrought gg 98S 995 Sham azh el aeh Rwsuhdel 55AD 55/55 56%hir modera ous OR Pte E dionne.Current cantlition is cap.roeimafely 35%or 4 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S �q adao & u a _ oc _ t 8 :: E E'c F Scientific Name L X o= i 8 - q+ v m e p.y WLCA Notes from Uptlatetl Overall Condlllon a& $c y rc r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n r w w g �_ Ratings&NOTES 2017 N E y po q c v n - - - - - - £. g o (Genoa,aPeciea) ii c E 8 u Spring 2015 Survey ONWARD a o ? a x x x i x s :¢G . m -'o ggm'e app'i rn g "ppFcF n� OG om Ecru 2 S�Eod= e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 wa SEe3E go as ide �d �L� nQ 2$ 0'2-2 2 UOo 5 u°fw« _ so ¢c4 o°wnOO� o TREE REMOVED. TREE REMOVED. 53 16.8 16.8 Shamel ash Fraxlnua uhdW 4 s 65160 63%fair good E E 80%Falr.Same condRlon as previously noted in past years. Tree appears to be declining from prolonged Bay A— S' 31.6 31.6 Shamelash Fraxlnua uhdW SW40 60150 55%fair moderate W OR tl-9—nditions.Current ondhion m approximately 35% P..,.. 55 21.8 21.8 Shamel a,h Fraxlnua uhdW ms 65160 60%fair good Tree declining moderately. 56 18.3 18.3 Shamelash Fraxlnua uhdW mo SSIS5 55%fair moderate W Overall—ditionm new roughly s0%(Fair). 57 18.5 18.5 Shamelash Fraxlnua uhdW 55130 65160 63%fair good E 58 26.6 26.6 Shamelash Fraxlnua uhdW 55130 60155 %%fair .o nft W 53 33.8 33.8 Shamelash Fraxlnua uhdW 55130 60110 55%fair good E 11 60 24.8 24.8 Shamelash Fraxlnua uhdW 45as 65155 60%fair good W 61 24.4 24.6 Shamelash Fraxlnua uhdW 55135 60160 60%fair .o nft E 62 27.8 27.8 Shamel ash Fraxlnua uhdW 55125 swso 50%fair poor.motl W 63 31.5 31.5 Shamelash Fraxlnua uhdW SSI00 70/65 68%fair good 5 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C oc _ t $ :: s E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 a- q+ v .c e y WLCA Notes from Uptlatetl Overall Condi[lon s& $c y¢ r c —'o u Common Name _ c$ tin_ c - n `o ' n i'71 Ratings&NOTES 2017 E N 4444 y a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,specie.) E u Spring 2015 Survey >3E� o x x x i x x mi0 o m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O E��o ft ._ ONWARD 2 dEE8_— e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8ez �Lti aQ 2$ 02 UOo 60 20.8 20.8 Shamelash F7ax1nua uhtlel 40/25 50/50 SOX fair poor to motl W 65 20.7 20.7 Shamelash F7ax1nua uhtlel Sens 65153 55%fair good E OR 66 37.8 37.8 Shamelash F7ax1nua uhtlel 60/25 70/63 68%fair good W 67 18.3 18.3 Shamelash F7ax1nua uhtlel 55125 65165 65%fair moderate W possible bark 68 x 41.0 41.0 Shamel a,h F7ax1nua uhtlel SSISO 60/55 58%fair motl to gootl NW inclusion 68 to or..PNM 19A 19.4 holly oak Quercws Ilex 45/20 60/60 60%fair mw oto W 70%overall condition"good'. 70 totransplard 13.2 13.2 holly oak Quercws Ilex 25/20 60/60 60%fair moderate W 65%overall condition"fait'. 71 40.8 40.8 Shamel ash F7ax/nua uhtlel 60145 65155 60%fair Sow 10 72 24.3 24.3 Shamel ash F7ax1nua uhtlel 55125 SSISO M%fair moderate E n...OR 73 26.2 26.2 Shamel ash F7ax1nua uhtlel 55135 50/50 M%fair poor W 16 74 28.0 28.0 Shamel ash F7ax1nua uhtlel 55130 60160 60%fair .o rote E 75 21.4 21.4 Shamel ash F7ax1nua uhtlel 40/25 50/50 M%fair .o rote W 76 20.2 20.2 Shamel ash F7ax1nua uhtlel 50/18 40/50 47%poor poor to motl E 6 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 Ea o'p°Y 8 crY itp E — $ c• ~n -'c n Common Name scientific Name i g$ _ ° 8 E Is ? IG--aPeclea) - i oa' 8 a € q; m updated overdo condition iFt; x @1 WLCA G15 s from y x x y m¢t9 `q- u� -9 y d opW ggc dgo miys� c �rc :m '- m s RatingsSNOTE52017 o §a'0rc�neLL a8 2 2 2 2 $c$ uSovE ae �" �r8 e.@ "@ 8�W aY c�8 gy _mm pdng zwssareay 2 2 S¢¢ pp 31u W 9 ONWARD iae 2- -ag '2 o2 77 t5.8 15.8 Shamelash FI.I.suhdal 45/15 40/90 35%poor poor W 78 17.0 17.0 Shamelash F.I.-uhdal SSY95 65/40 SOX fa'v motlrate enous GR 212 212 Shamel aeh F.I.-uhdal SS/25 SS/55 55%fair poor to motl W OR 8s 28.2 282 Shamel ash FI.I.s uhdN SSY95 60/50 55%fair motlemte E 81 24.1 24.7 Shamela6h FI.Inus uhdN SSY95 55/5p 59X fair motlemte W 82 19.0 19.0 Shamel aeh Fazlnus uhdal SS/2p 45/50 0%poor poor to motl E Be 17.8 11.8 Shamel aeh Fraxlnus uhdal 6S/9p 60/55 57X fair motlnate W 84 212 212 Shamel aeh Fraxlnus uhdal 95p0 SSISS SSX fair motlarate E 85 20.9 20.9 Shamel ash Finalnus uh" moderab m 55/9p 65I60 6S%fair good W 86 29.2 29.2 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlal SSY95 65I50 58%Fair gootl OR 87 22.8 22.8 shame ash Fr-k—uhow 93Y95 6535 60%fair motl to gootl NW Be X 5.9 5.0 4.9 15.8 Monbmy pine Plnus moMN 9111 65/65 65%fair motlar ID of species not veri}ietl Islantl pine Plnus canarlensls gold 0 fo 4 Removetl as o(Jan,2020. 7 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 a E " E c F Scientific Name L 8 m- q+ v `,_,- w e C y WLCA Notes from Uptlatetl Overall Condition z& $e y rc r c -'o u Common Name _ c S o n_ c - n >, A m E �_ a Ratings&NOTES 2017 m E ur pu A c e. _ _ _ _ _ _ £. o (Genoa,aPeciea) a' ¢ m rn ii w c - c a _ u Spring 2015 Survey g u d _ v L c Oft o ONWARD x x x i x s :¢ro . m �a 22me wEEa ra g Yc n� o� o E� yEdV SEe3 iae 8e? �Lti a@ 2 02 u>' Hn u°fH so ¢cq o°wi: a8 ¢GN uO6'E _ rcrc n_ ID of species not verlfletl.Tree 16.0 Monterey pine Plnus mdlate 1825 M. 90%pow m er OR appears to be Removetl as of Jan,202 Infected by pine pitch canker fungus. Tree has bark beetle 20A 20.4 Monterey pine Plnus mdiata 25/2s 40100 40%p r poortomotl W Issuesantllorpine Removed—Jan,2020 pitch canker Infection. mor000tl,o tcpanioPsiz 15%very 82 X X 1S.S 1S.S r ca btree an Mloldes,or 20115 25110 poor to poor motl W Removed—Jam2020 Cemronia silique rre000d,or Cup mpsis 89 X 11.6 11.6 ca b U.. anac Mloides,or 20/1s 50130 45%p..r ..d..te 4 to 7 Removetl as of Jan,2020 Cenronla silique rmo..d,or cupaniopsis 8a X 13.0 13.0 ca bU.. anac Mloides,or 20/20 45135 40%p..r poortomotl 1-2 Removed—Jam2020 Cenronia silique Active crack Is cons Cupaniopsis • d.Tree 85 X X 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 35.0 .--.od,or anac Mloldes,or 20/20 fi5110 30%po0r risk"of gootl 1 Ietleretl carob tree Removetl as.(Jan,2020 Ceati silique "extrem failure.Remove ASAP. 86 X 34.0 34.0 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhdO 40/2s 6-S 57%fair gootl X Removed—Jam2020 87 rotranspNM X 1..3 1S3 holly oak Quercus ilex 20/25 7-5 71%good gootl 80%overal1 condition'gootl" 8e rotra..pi.. X 14.0 14.0 holly oak Quercus Ilex 2SI25 7.5 7 ... gootl 70%overall condition-go-" 88 rotransphi. X 11.6 11.6 helly oak Quercus Ilex 22/20 TOM 70%good moderab 78%overal1 condition'gootl" 12.3 12.3 Monterey pine P/nus bdi- 1E/1s 50/50 50%fair ..d..te SE 13 ID ofspeeiasn Removetl as of Jan,202 verlfletl. Monterey pine P/nos mdi- 28120 50150 50%fair ..d..te Removetl as of Jan,2020 102 2&. 2S.8 Shamelash Fraxlnus A. .1 50135 401poor motlerate X 12 8 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg o`o S _ C If _ t a E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 a- q+ v m e e y WLCA Note,from Uptlatetl Overall Condition Ea& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n i'71 Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 dEE8_— e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8,? �Lti aQ 2$ 02 UOo a:c4mm� Ea $'c a4 uO�Eo °z Estimated overall condition of 20%very poor as Of 7/23/2020 dne m e.tensive decay on tensmn side(n,rch side)of ram t c to with possible increasing lean soul aver N. 103 X 24.7 24.7 SM1amel a,M1 Fraxlnus uhtlel 55135 50/40 4S%pow moderate E X 8 Wolfe Rd.d.WLCA m insalletltwo nails and starced monitoring lean angle of 712&2020.TM1e baseline (di.6 today was 74.4 tlerd-)15.(WL degrees off ical).WLCA suggests removal of free at[his time. 104 16.5 16.5 Shamel a,h Fraxlnus uhdW mo 55/5o 50%fair .o rate E E X Needs endwelght reductlon pruning 105 16.0 16.0 Shamel a,h Fraxlnus uhdW 45/25 45/45 45%poor moderate E X 4 106 X 21.7 21.7 Shamel a,h Fraxlnus uhdW Seas 60/So 55%fair good X X 107 X 19.4 19.4 Shamel a,h Fraxlnus uhdW Sams 60145 s5%fair .o rate S X 109 1s.9 15.9 Shamel asM1 Faxlnus uhdel 55%fair 7 rlo motl Removetl as of Jan,2020, 109 X 14.4 14.4 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhdO 35/25 40/40 40%poor poor to motl N Removetl as of Jan,2020. 110 X 16.9 16.9 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhM 45/30 4-0 35%poor poor 11 Removetl as of Jan,2020. 111 X X 29.7 29.7 Monterey pine Plnus mdlata 45/35 60/55 57%fair moderate Measured at 2 feet. Removetl as of Jan,2020. 112 X X 19.1 19.1 Monterey pine Plnus mdh. 25/15 - D%—d Removetl as of Jan,2020. 25%very Bark beetle issues 113 X X 2- Is. 43.0 Monterey pine Plnus mdlata 30/20 25125 poor poor W and/or pine pith Removetl as of Jan,2020. cankerfungus. 9 of 95 R.I.g.&NOT S2017 ONWARD �JAMMM "]Mlo R.--d.­J..,2.2._ MqMjM R.--d­J..,2.2._ limb 0111111MEMOMMENEI M-Amom IF, 11q11111mm mommill --ANNE 6­ 11111mm mommill �1010 wo mimillimm mommill .110010 1w, momollbodmosom pr jj� ­111111MEMMEMMIllIlloolo R-d-J.,2.20- 1 J11111MM MEMMIllIllool T-..-.d.i.. 1L � RI-11-1,2120 110001"M'm R-d-J.,2.20- R.I.g.&NOT S2017 OMMD R...d..&J..,2020. R..—d—J.,2.2.. 16D WWI pr how Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e WLCA Egoo S E _ t $ :: a E " 'c F cienfic ame L e- q+ v m e t'.y Notes from uptlaa d Overall Ecoadlllon x Es S $e y rc r c -'o u Common Name ti N 9_ c$ o n_ c - n `oRatings&NOTES 2017 y =a o (SGenoa,specie.) s: ¢ m u b mow c - c a c E u Spring 2015 Survey rn �qc , n x x x i x x maG w m �a 22me qEEaY$5Pc EE ��o fr ._ ONWARD dE E' 2 ma ZIT go as iae 8a? �Lti e.Q 20 02 U' & of�,$ ¢cq a°wn n8 �'c.A uO�Eo °z pr Emm .e fi. W Ficus species Flcussp. 20112 M. SSX fair m er ovod..&Oa0Nov2018per parking level. plan. .8 3.7 8.fi Ficue sp-m. Flcus sp. 20112 70150 55%fair mad.-- Located M P1 ovetl as of Od N.v 2018 per 7 parking level. plan. .0 4.3 8.3 Ficus epecm. Flcus sp. 20112 70150 55%fair mad... Located M P1 ovetl as of Od N.v 2018 per parking level. plan. 143 5.0 4.1 8.1 Ficus species Flcussp. 20112 7-0 55%fair moderate X Located al Pt ovetl as of Od N.v 2018 per parking W.I. plan. 144 X 5.. 4.6 4.4 14.0 Ficus species Flcussp. 20112 7-0 55%fair moderate Located M P1 -odasofOWNov2010per parking level. plan. 145 X 24.7 24.7 Monterey pine Plnus mdi.. 35125 fi0160 60%fair moderate Removedasof Jan,2020. 146 X 0.1 0.1 vergre..pear Pyrus kawakamll 2011s 6-0 57%fair mad... Removedasof Jan,2020. 147 X 7.2 7.2 vergre..pear Pyrus kawakamll 15112 40140 40%poor poor W Removedasof Jan,2020. 148 X 42.2 42.2 ..straw Saquola sempervlrens 6-s 00180 00%good gootl X Removedasof Jan,2020. 149 X 28.0 28.0 oastretlwaod Saquola sempervma. 5511s 3514s 40%poor poor X X Removedasof Jan,2020. Need,root crown 0owerling cherry vation. 1S0 X 4.0 3.1 7.1 Pr^nos sermlata Cult 12I8 33-0 30%poor ?Out of leaf BRC ContlNion not Removed as of Jan,2020, Nlvar erifietl(tre out of leaf during survey). 151 X 27.7 27.7 oastretlwaod Saquola s—jaaMma. fi0120 .-a fib%fair goad 0 tc 3 X X Removetl as of Jan,2.20. 152 X 31.2 31.2 oastretlwaod Saquola sempe—a. 5511s 6-0 60%fair mad.-- X Removetl as of Jan,2.20. 12 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Egoo S �q adao & u a _ F' _ C oc _ t 8 :: a E " E'c F Scientific Name L 8 e- q+ v m e p.y WLCA Notes from U'Iafetl Overall Condlllon x Ea S $e y rc r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o n i'm g - a Ratings&NOTES 2017 N y a c c c c c c _m„ $o (Genoa,aP-he.) a: ¢ m u b mow c - c a c E u Spring 2015 Survey m �qc , n x x x i x x miG w m �a 22me qEEa .Faw g Y$5Pc _ ns E� EE E�o1 ft ._ ONWARD dEE' = e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8e? �Lti e.Q 20 02 U' & of�,$ ¢cq A°wn a8 �'c.A uO�Eo °z pr oast retlwootl uola sempervhens 53115 60/60 60%fair aner Removetl as of Jan,2020. t3.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempamimns sins ]0170 70%9ootl mad... X 75%overall condition"gootl". Removed as of January 2020. 20.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 50115 ]0170 ]0%gootl matlera[e X 75%overall condition"gootl". Removed as of January 2020. 156 X 27,4 27.4 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens ii- 7-s 75%.ad gootl X 65%overa11contllllon"falr". Removed 112020. 157 X 29.0 29.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempamimns 60116 7-0 70%gootl mad... X 65%overall contllflon"falr". Removed as of Jan,2020. Root system 55%overall condition"fair" 153 X 27.2 27.2 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 6011s 50140 40%poor poor X enad tluring ADA removed as of Jan,2020. amp installation. Root system 35%overall contllflon"poor". 159 X 34.9 34.9 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 7012s 6-0 46%poor poor to mod X enad Eurmg ADA Removetlas of Jan,2020. amp installation. 160 X 16.2 16.2 fern pine Podocarpus gmclllor 55112 7-0 35%poor mad..e X 3 50%overall contllflon"falr". Removed as of Jan,2020. 161 X 14.6 14.6 fern pine Pad ocarpus gmclllor 5016 40120 27%very poor X 17 45%overall contllflon"poor". poor Removed as of Jan,2020. 162 X 11.1 11.1 tree species out of Genus species 45116 5012s 32%poor poor S S At various R.-as of Jan,2020. leaf .1-1ons 163 X 21.5 21.s SM1amel- Fraxlnus hdal 4-0 3-0 30%poor poor E 9 X Removetl a a of Jan,2020. 164 X 18.6 18.6 SM1amel- Fraxlnus hdal s-o 3513s 35%poor poor X Removetl a a of Jan,2020. 165 X 21A 21A SM1amel- Fraxlnus hdal 50130 3.30 30%poor poor 6 X Removetl a a of Jan,2020. 13 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Egoo S �q _ C oc _ t 8 :: u E " E'c F lcien0fic Name L X o= i 9 e- q+ v m e C y WLCA Nptea from Uptlatetl Overall Condition Es S $e y rc r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o n i'm g - Ratings&NOTES 2017 y =a c c c c c c _m„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) a: ¢ m u b mow c - 6.S a c E u Spring 2015 Survey x x x i x x miG w m �a 22me qEEa .Faw g Y$5Pc _ ONWARD dEE' = e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8ez �Lti aQ 202-2 °2 U' & of�,$ �'o X 16.9 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdO =s =s poor moved as of January 2020 167 X 21.6 21.6 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdO —s 30130 30%poor poor X moved as of January 2020 168 X 12.1 12.1 SM1ame1asM1 Fraxlnus uhdO 3-0 50140 45%poor poortomod GR X moved as of January 2020 169 X X 20.1 20.1 SM1ame1asM1 Fraxlnus uhdO —s 25125 25%very very poor X emoved as of January 2020 P., 170 X 25.9 25.9 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdO 5-o 55140 45%po0r poor were GR X moved as of January 2020 171 X 40.2 40.2 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens —5 00180 00%good moderate X X IW1875%overall condi0on. Reovetl as of 1I2020. 172 X 21.2 21.2 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdO 45/30 55145 49%po0r poor 0 emoved as of January 2020 173 X X 27.2 27.2 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 6— 45145 45%po0r poor X emoved as of January 2020 174 X 29.5 29.5 SM1ame1asM1 Fraxlnus uhdO S-o 3-0 30%po0r poor 0to7 X emoved as of January 2020 175 X 26.5 26.5 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdW S-o 50160 55%fair moderate X moved as of January 2020 176 X X 22.5 22.5 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdW 55140 2-0 27%very very poor X moved as of January 2020 poor 177 X X 37.5 37.5 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 6— 55160 58%fair poor to motl X X moved as of January 2020 178 X 5.7 3.8 9.5 strawberry tree Arhums unedo is"s 7-0 60%fair ..darate W W X moved as of January 2020 14 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Egoo S �q adao & u a _ F' _ C oc _ u E " E'c F Scientific Name L 9 e- q+ v m e E-2 WLCA Note,from U'Iafed Overall Condition a S $e y rc r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ g - a Ratings&NOTES 2017 pr E y =a c c c c c c _m„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) a: ¢ m u b mow c - c , c E u Spring 2015 Survey m �qc , n x x x i x x miG w m �a 22me qEEa .Faw g Y$$Pc _ ns E� EE ��o ft ._ ONWARD 2 ma SEe3 go as ¢cq o°wn o.,a �'c.A u °z str ,—rr,tree Arhums unedo 20/12 go go movetl as of January 2020 .2 21.2 SM1am—h Fraxlnus uhdO ssas 1S115 15/very verypoor 11 X movetl as of January 2020 poor 18t X 11.6 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 55/6 10/10 10%o*ry very poor X X movetl as of January 2020 182 X .2 21.2 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 6S112 5/5 5%verypaor verypoor X emovetl as of January 2020 183 X X 13.8 13.8 SM1amel— Fraxlnus uhdO -16 20120 20%Very very poor GR X movetl as of January 2020 P., 189 X X 11.8 11.9 SM1amel— Fraxlnus uhdO -12 5/5 5%verypaor verypoor X emovetl as of January 2020 185 X X 13.l 13.3 SM1ame1— Fraxlnus uhdO 50/18 20/20 20%very very pom X emovetl as of January 2020 P., 186 X X 8.1 e.] SM1ame1— Fraxlnus uhdW 3.12 Vo 8%verypoor very pom X emovetl as of January 2020 187 X 34.1 31.1 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 55/25 60160 60%fair moderate X removetl as of January 2020 188 X X 12.2 122 dollar gum Euca/ypfus 50120 2gy2g 20%very m seedling palyanrhemos(seetllingJ poor very poor N N X ovetl as of January 2020 189 X X 18.1 18.1 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 60120 40140 40%poor poor X movetl as of January 2020 180 X X 26.8 26.9 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 10/25 40/40 a0%poor poor X movetl as of January 2020 191 X 17.5 175 dollar gum Euca/ypfus 60/35 6-0 58%fair moderate 5 movetl as of January 2020 seedling palyanrhemos(seetllingJ 15 of 95 R.I.g.&NOT S2017 ONWARD elm IME11111111MEMEEMM111 -,15MME 1 11111MEMEEME1160 Elm lio 1 11111MEMEEMENIF6" Elm IF ib MEME09MEMEEMMIS" ins LANDSCAPE TRMR..OV..1RO. IMM11111111 LANDSCAPE ON Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 _ C If _ t 8 :: a E " E'c F Scientific Name L 8 a- q+ v m e t'.y WLCA Notes from Updated Overall Condlllon x Ea S $e Ti rc r c -'o u Common Name _ c S o n_ c - n `o n i'm g - Ratings&NOTES 2017 y =a c c c c c c _m„ $o (Genoa,species) u b mow c - c a c E u Spring 2015 Survey m �qc , n x x x i x x miG w m �a 22me qEEa .Few g Y$$Pc _ ns o� EE ��o ft ._ ONWARD e'E go as iae t3 ez �Lti e.Q 2$ 02 U' & off z .6p uO� o °z pr oast retlwootl p-1.sempervlrens M. 7W5 75%good goad isope stability Removetl as of January Possible steep .1 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 75/20 75/65 70%gootl goatl billslopestability Removetlasof January Possible steep billslope stability arboiNeetla st cabling oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlens 1-1 7-1 50%fair goatl 25 between e i— mstems,'rf retan Possible steep billslope stability. arboi.Neetla st cabling oast retlwootl sequoia sempervlens 00/25 75/40 50%fair goatl between Removetl as o(J—, a of lwo 209 TREE REMOVED FROM IANDSCAPE Possible sfablllry 210 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlren 05/25 75/60 65%fair moderate Roots maybavle1. Removetl as of January been severed. 211 14.9 oas[retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 50/15 65/6s 0%fair moderate X X Removetl as of January 212 22.0 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 65/is 75/7s 75%gootl moderate X X Removetl as o(January tulip tree Tree appears deatl, (ID nol verNled- 0%tleatl but may simply be 213 X 16.0 tree out of leaf �Irlodendron fullpHere 35/30 0/0 (Confirm in W above grountl Removetl as o(January tluring survey) spring) tlor nt until spring maleafout. 214 X X 31.3 31.3 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 75/2s 75/6s 70%gootl moderate X Removetl as of January 215 X 20.3 20.3 (ern pine Podocarpus greclllor 50/20 00/60 70%gootl gootl W Removetl as of January 216 X t5A 15.4 fern pine Podocarpus greclllor 50/20 75/6s 70%gootl gootl W Removetl as of January 20 217 X 19.6 13.6 fern pine Podocarpus greclllor 50/20 75/6s 70%gootl gootl W Removetl as of January 2020 17 of 05 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 e €< t o a Opdmod.0n conaelm a E y c S c e + Scienti0c Name U $ a o= _ :`m m g o .m c n WLCA Notea from Ratings&NOTES 2017 Common Name yy et ii w c c — c O.. oc E u g Spring 2015 Survey ONWARD (Genus,species( g e' n i u d W gg w y w W B 1E3 1u E dd 4 g2me @gg md'B n@ YY _q 02 ub 8 — °$ �°p o$ aE IT edfy condition tuNp tree cehee has leatod Removetl as of Janua (ID nolverifled- Lirlodendron 0/0 out not In tr out of leaf spring' ee aurins sarveYl Tre I in decline with an X apparent overall condtion of 219 X 20.8 20.6 Shame)ash Fraxlnus hdid 50/25 40/50 4JX poor poor to motl W roagM1ly 30°/.(Fowl. 220 X 26.8 26.8 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uh" SS/35 60/55 59X hir motlwate Tree jI in tlecline with an apparent overall condNon of 221 18.3 19.1 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uh" 50/25 50/50 50%hir in MndI roughly 35%(Pood. Tree is in tlecline wim an apparent ov—condition of 222 X 185 19.5 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhM M5 60/55 S1%hir mo nd,, E roughly 30%(Poor). 223 X 90A 90.9 Shamel aeh Fraxlnus uhdN 55/40 70145 55%fair goad E E OR 12 X Removed per plan on /012212019 by Gt.magiN, X 189 igq Shamel asM1 Fraxlnus hdel 50115 —0 40%poor poor to mod W DEVCON. IL Roots severed on Y5.4 Shamel a,h Fraxlnus uhdel SW35 SW40 43%poor madam. E west side. 225 X 25.9 Roots severetl on 226 X 15.5 15.5 Shamel ash Fraxlnus oh" 45/25 50/30 37%pow moderate E E 0l01 west sitle. Roots severed on 18.5 Shamel ash Fraxlnus oh" 45/25 30/20 25%-- poor E 0 to 5 14 west sld,. 227 X X 18.5 Roots se :d on 228 X 11.5 11.5 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhdel 30125 40r30 sii%o moderate E west sitl. Removetl as of Jan,2020. 229 X 9.6 9.6 oast redwood sequoia sempervlrens 2S112 g0/90 90%exce11ent g.nd Removetl as of Jan,2020. 230 X 8.9 8.9 oast redwood sequoia semporvkens .11, 90190 g0%excellent g.nd 18 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 _ C o c _ t 8 :: a E " E'c F Scientific Name L 8 a- q+ v m e p.y WLCA Note,from Uptlared Overall Condition Ex S $e y rc r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ g - Ratings&NOTES 2017 y =a c c c c c c _m„ $o (Genoa,aPecfea) s: ¢ m u b mow c - c a c E u Spring 2015 Survey m �qc , n x x x i x x miG w m �a 22me qEEa .Faw g Y$5Pc _ ns E� EE ��o ft ._ ONWARD SEe3 go as iae 8a �Lti e.Q 20 02 U' & of�,$ �'a uO�Eo °z 2-2 SM1amel-h Fraxlnus uhdO 451207-5 99X pow poor Removetl as of Jan,2020. 18.9 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdO 55/30 42%poor poor to motl E Removetlasof Jan,2020. 19.6 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdel 55/30 50/40 4]%poor mOtlera[e E otoi Removetlasof Jan,2020. 236 x 15.1 15.1 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdO 50/25 35/35 35%poor poor E Removetl as of Jan,2020. 235 x 17.8 17.8 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdO 55/25 55/40 50%fair moderate Removetlasof Jan,2020. 236 x 17A 17.4 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhM 55/25 55/55 55%fair moderate Removetlasof Jan,2020. 237 x 6.5 6.5 SM1amel- Fraxlnus uhM 30/15 75/65 70%gootl mod to gootl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 238 x 9.2 9.2 SM1amel- Fraxlnus uhM 35/10 7-0 72%gootl mod to gootl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 239 x 6.8 6A SM1amel- Fraxlnus uhdO 30/10 7-s 54%fair mod to gootl i-GR Removetl as of Jan,2020. 240 x 8" 8.1 SM1amel- Fraxlnus uhM 3.18 ]0/60 70%gootl mod to gootl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 241 X 6.4 6.4 oast retlwaotl Sequoia sempervlrens 3.10 05/85 05%gootl gootl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 242 X 5.4 5.4 oast retlwaotl Sequoia sempervlrens 3.10 05/85 05%gootl gootl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 243 X 5.7 5.7 oast retlwaotl Sequoia sempervlrens 3.10 05/85 05%gootl gootl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 19 of 95 R.I.g.&NOT S2017 OMMD R...d..&J..,2020. R.--d.—J..,2.2.- R.--d.—J..,2.2.- R.--d.—J..,2.2.- R.--d.—J..,2.2.- R.--d.—J..,2.2.- R.--d.—J..,2.2.- R.--d.—J..,2.2.- R.--.d.—J..,2.2.- R.--d.—J..,2.2.- R.--d.—J..,2.2.- R.--d.—J..,2.2.- Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Egoo S � a E " E'c F Scientific Name L X o= q+ v '1 WLCA Notes from llptlated Overall Condlllon x Ea S $e y rc r c -'o u Common Name _ c S o n_ c - n Ratings&NOTES 2017 y $a c c c c c c _m„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) e ¢ m u b mow c - c o c E u Spring 2015 Survey m �qcmiG w m �a 22me qEEa .Few g Y$$Pc _ ns E� EE ONWARD eME 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8a �Lti e.Q 2$ °2 ¢c4 a°wn n8uO�Eo °z g pear(ou calleryana Cult 90/15 BL35 fiSYe fair go 10 Removetl as of Jan,20 of lea ' 67 flowering Pear(out pyrua calleryana Cull. 30/15 05/6a 67%fair gootl X X Removetlaaof Jan,202 of leaf 4.9 4.8 floweringNpaear(out pyruscalleryana Cult 2.12 85/65 68%fair gootl X Removetlaaof Jan,202 Tree Is In roughly the same tllscre[lonary LalMornla erall condition rating as not 260 transplant X 95.8 35.9 X ayaamore Milan-racemosa 6S145 6S/So 60%fair moderate W W ov In prlor years.Tree to be transplanted per protect team. Bark sloughing at Tree is in roughly[he same 261 dlsoretlonary X 22.8 2t.8 44.7 X Callfornla plafanus racemosa 6S145 ]S145 ST%fair motlarab N83 GR Sea notes Al zero ft. mot crown possibly ovanall condition rating as not transplant sycamore at dght due to lNlgatl.n In prlor years.Tree to be water spray. transplanted per protect team. Tree Is In roughly the same 262 dlsaretlonary X 15A 15.4 X LalRornia plafanus raoemosa 43/30 7Mo 70%gootl moderate NE NE 1ft. erall condill-rating as not transplant sycamore vIn prlor years.Tree to be transplanted per protect team. Tree c.nditm.is roughly tM1e 263 X 13.5 13.5 Shamel a,h Fraxlnus uh" 35/15 50145 47%poor moderate S S GR ame a a previously..ad in past years. 264 Shamel asM1 Fraxlnus uhdel a 55/55 55%fair poor to motl 5 5 Removetl a a of Jan,202041 to.0 Shamel asM1 Fraxlnus uhdel 50/2a 5514a 45%poor mad.-- GR 25 Removetl a a of Jan,2020. 266 X 20.8 Shamel— Fraxlnus uhdat 55/3a 50/3a 35%poor poor to motl X Roots havadbaen Removetl a a of Jan,2020. —na267 X 23.7 23.7 Shamel— Fraxlnus uhdat 50/35 6-0 30%poor gootl SW SW GR Roots havtlbeen R.—a a of Jan,Mo. 268 X 26.5 26.5 Shamel— Fraxlnus uhdat 55/25 75/55 0%fair gootl 5 X Removetl a a of Jan,2020. 269 X 27.1 27.1 Shamel— Fraxlnus hdal 55/25 75/45 55%fair goad nous GR 25 X Removetl a a of Jan,2020. 21 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 updated oeeran condition a E y c r5 c e + 5cientigc Name U $ e n._ o f = m c m m n' v _ m. c n WLCA Notea from Ratings It NOTES 2017 o E v E is r V µ°'' ii Common Name 8 ._ Spring 2015 Survey ONWARD o q-`a w (Genus,species) g e' n i u d re a W w W B d lu E m 'c f °sy = ga Sod ESQ aE §¢'rca°wit aS 2 2 2 2 2 2 Root system Tree ddnditian appears to be F u 10 asymmetrical declining.Currentcdndition 276 X 28.7 28.7 Shemel aaM1 F-xlnus uhdN 60Y35 75/55 63%fair good rating is rougM1ly 46%(Poor). X 271 X 35.2 35.2 coast Mwoad Spools samparvinrrs 60/20 70f70 70%pad moderate X 272 X 183 19.1 ...t nisdan,ad Spool-sampaMrens 10/12 68170 69%fair moderate X .3 X 233 23.3 ...t nisdan,ad Spuo1-sa P wmns 60/12 70f70 70%good moderate X 2. X 230 23.8 oast redwood spool-s—Pww ens 60/12 70fn) 70%good moderate X 275 170 17.0 Shemel ash Fr-Masuh" 55116 65/65 65%fair moderate Tree condltlon same as noted in 276 X 15.9 15.9 Shemel ash Fr-Xlnus uh" 50/12 40/30 34%poor poor E at root crown X pdor y»re. Tree condition appears to be nous OR X declining.Current condition is 277 183 19.3 Shemel ash Fr-xlnus uh" 50/25 W40 40%pow motlarets E E roughly 30%(Poor). Tree condition appears to be d»tin nil- Y48.%condition is 278 X 210 21.0 Shemel ash Fr-zlnus uh" 60/25 60150 35%fair moderate W W OR r Tree condltlon appeam to be declining.Cunen/condltion is 26.7 ...t ratlwootl Spuola s—P.Wmn. 50/20 80/80 80%gootl g.ad roughly 70%(I.e.the low and of "Good"condltlon rating range). 2'/8 X 26.7 Tree contlitian app.ans to be .ado..OR X dacli on is 280 16A 16A Shemel ash Fr-pinus on" Wit 30145 37%p oor oor Pni gNy 30%conditi vary Root.severetl. pdor y»re. Condition same as noted In 20% 281 X 21.2 21.2 Shemel ash Fr-zlnus uhdai 50/35 30/20 poor very poor 6 X Tree In same condition as E GR X Roots ceveretl. previously noted In past years. 282 15.0 15.0 Shames»h flazlmrs uhdal Ms30rl0 90%poor poor 22 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C oc _ t $ :: u E E'c F Scientific Name L E e- q+ v m e P.y WLCA Notes from Ipdalod Overall CondIIIon x Ee& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n i'71 a Ratings&NOTES 2011 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPecfea) u b mow c - c a c E u Spring 2015 Survey >3E� s x x x i x x mit5 n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 yma SEe3 go as iae 8ez �Lti as 2$ -- 02 UOo ¢cgnwn n8 ¢G.A 5 'E A z Tree In decline.Cu- 283 X 18.1 18.1 Shamelash Fra1—uhdW SO/20 40a" 35%poor poor-mod E OR X Roots severetl. c*"dM,"is roughly 26%(Very Poor).Suggest conslder removal of tree. 2" 14.4 14.4 Shamel ash F]a 1—uhdW 40/25 40140 0%poor poor OR X Tree In same condition as previously noted In past years. 285 X 18.4 18.4 Shamelash F]a1—uhdW SO/25 SW40 44%poor poor-mod E E OR X Roots severetl. 286 X 17.0 17.0 Shamelash F]a 1—uhM 40145 60160 60%fair nn Mrale N 287 X 24.3 24.1 oact r -d Sequoia s—P-1... 60/15 ]MO 70%goad nn—rn X 15.7 iS.] oas[retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 60/15 70]]0 70%gootl matlera[e X Removetl as of Jan,2020 Apical meristem oast retlwaotl Sequoia sempervlren fi0/15 50/6s fi3%fair m.d..e X sympfo phm l di Removetl as of Jan,2020 290 X 14.8 14.8 Shamelash Frsxlnus uhtlN 40/20 4S/35 40%poor poor-mod W nous OR X Treelndecllno.C—t contll[lon Is 30%(Poor). 291 X 24.2 24.2 Shamelash Fra 1—uhM SW40 SW45 48%pow nn Mnft W nous OR 6 Treelndecll no.C.— contll[lon Is 36%(Poor). Tree is in d din.tlue to chronic 292 X 16.3 16.3 oastr -d SwluolasemPeMrens 35/10 ]MO 70%gootl modern- droughty conditions.Current ondi ion rating m 60%(Fair). 283 TREE REMOVED FROM LANDSCAPE. fern pine7--p..gmclllor 30/18 50/4o 45%poor moderate W Removetlasof Jan,202 8.6 8.6 southern magnolia Magnogagmndigora 1E/15 25/2s 2S%very very poor W 8 1017 Removetlasof Jan,202 P., 23 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Egoo S _ u E " E'c F 3cien0fic Name L 8 a- q+ v m e e.2 WLCA Note,from Uptlated Overall CondIIIon S. x Es S $e y rc r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o n i'm g - a Ratings&NOTES 2017 y =a c c c c c c _m„ $o (Genoa,aPecfea) a: ¢ m u b mow c - c a c E u Spring 2015 Survey n x x x i x x miG w m �a 22me qEEa .Faw g Y$$Pc _ ns E� EE ��o ONWARD dEE' = e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8,z �Lti e.Q 2$ 02 U' & of�,$ �'a ¢cq a°wn a8 cw pr -I=Mml V .A uO�Eo °z 17.J SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdO Ms 3505 35%pow poor Removed as of Jan,2020 297 X X 12.1 12.1 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdO 25/15 35/20 20%Very poor poor Removetl as o(Jan,2a20 298 X X 18.8 18.8 oast redwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 60/12 15115 15% very pow X Removetl as of Jan,2020 299 X 16.0 16.0 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdO 45/15 30/45 40%poor poor E Removetl as of Jan,2.2. 300 X X 23.3 23.3 oast redwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 60/15 20/20 30/Very very pow X Removetl as of Jan,M20 poor 301 X X 15.2 15.2 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdel 25/10 20/15 19tivory very pow X Removetl as of Jan,2020 poor 302 X 26.9 15A 41.8 oast redwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 70/25 6-0 60%fair moderate X Removetl as of Jan,2020 303 X 17.2 17.2 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdel 35/25 55160 55%fair mOJerate NW Removetlasof Jan,2g20 3" X X 18.0 18.0 oast redwootl Sequoia sempervlrens -10 5/5 5%verypaor verypoor X Removetlasof Jan,M20 305 X X 20.1 20.1 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdel 20/15 10/10 10�o°ry X 6 Removetlasof Jan,2020 306 X 17.5 17.5 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdel 45/25 50/40 40%po0r poor to mod W 8 Removetlasof Jan,2020 907 X X 17.7 17.7 SM1amel asM1 Fraxlnus uhdel 40/20 30125 29A Very poor X 0 to 6 Removetl as of Jan,M20 poor 308 X 21.1 21.1 oast redwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 50/15 7 5 75%gootl goad Removetl as of Jan,2020 24 of 95 R.I.g.&NOT S2017 N.R. R...d..&J..,2020 MOIL.40 R.--d.—J..,2.2. EEMEj§WjjjESjE R.--d.—J..,2.2. Ike IPPR.--d.—J..,2.20 P-e-. Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg o`o S _ C If _ t E E'c F Scientific Name L S - q+ v m e e y WLCA Note,from Uptlatetl Overall Condition E& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ `o ' n i'71 Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 444p44 =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) a: ¢ m u b mow c - c , c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 dE E8_— e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8,z �Lti e.a 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ .6 ¢ngnwn Ea $'c iA uO�Eo °z 322 X 11.9 11.9 Sham,I,,h Fraxlnus uhdW 4S/15 40140 40%poor poor X 323 X 9.4 9.4 Sham,I,,h Fraxlnus uhdW 4S/12 30/30 30%poor poor X 3. X 12.8 12.8 Sham,I,,h Fraxlnus uhdW W12 30140 35%poor poor X 325 X X 7.4 7.4 Sham,I a,h Fraxlnus uhdW 28/12 2g/2g 20%very very poor X poor 326 X 13.0 13.0 Sham,I,,h Fraxlnus uhdW 4S/20 45155 48%poor poor X 927 X 11.8 11.8 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 4S112 90/30 30%poor poor E OR X Jill TREE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM LANDSCAPE. 328 X 14.2 14.2 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhM 4S/20 35/40 38%poor poor S X 330 X 15.7 15.7 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhM 40/20 30/40 35%poor poor S X 331 X 10.1 10.1 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhM 30/20 40/35 37%poor poor S S X 332 X X 18.8 18.8 oact red-d Swluola s—PSMmns 55/12 S/5 5%very Poor very poor X 0%(Dead). 333 X X 18.4 18.9 oact red-d Sequoia s—Pervlmns SS/8 S/5 5%vary poor very poor X 0%(Deed). 334 X iB.S 18.5 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhM 4=5 45155 50%fair mod,rate X 26 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 o a updated overan condition a E y e S c e + 5cientigc Name U $ e n._ o f = .m c n WLCA Noted from Ratings It NOTES 2017 o E v E c r? V ' ; Common Name yy c u c — c m.. g sc E u g 8 ._ Spring 2015 Survey ONWARD o q—`n m (Genus,species) g e' n i u d m a W w W B 13 1u E m 2 = ga Sod§ ESQ aE <'rco°wn aS 2 2 2 2 2 2 X g%(oeaal. 335 X X 16.0 16.0 oact rsdwootl Spuola sampaMmns 50/12 5/5 5%vary poor very poor 10%vary moderate ainetem X 336 X X 9.6 9.6 sh um -n Frarinus uhdW 25/10 10/10 Rom 997 X X 8.8 8.8 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhdN 2Sfl 5/5 5%vary poor very poor dine eon X 338 X a, 8.7 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhM 30/8 90/10 15,00ery poor ainetem X X 339 X 12.8 12.8 Shamol ash FraXlnus uhM 40/20 40/40 40%poor ,our W X S40 X 143 14.3 Shamol aah F—Inus uhM 50/20 35/40 38%poor poor 341 X X 10.9 10.9 Shamol ash Fraxlnus uh" 3" 10/10 io%v' very poor ainetem X 10 342 X X 12.0 12.0 Shamol ash Fraxlnus uh" 45/18 10/10 poo X ,ry very poor ainetem Verily condition X ce tree leap out 343 X 13.7 13.7 Shamol ash Frazlnus uh" 45/18 35135 35%pocr poor in spring. 20%vary X 3" X X 7.3 7.3 Shamol ash Frazlnus uh" 20/12 20/20 poor very poor 8 X 345 X 14.4 14.4 Shamol ash FraXinus on" soY20 4W30 35%P Poor 10%vary E X 346 X X 10.7 10.7 Shamel ash Frazlnus uhtlal 25/12 10/10 for very poor 17%vary X 347 X X 11.3 11.3 Shames»h flazlrws uhtlal 25I12 25I10 Poor poor 27 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C oc _ t $ :: a E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 a- q+ v m e e y WLCA Note°from Uptlatetl Overall Condi[lon x E& $c y¢ 1=c —'o u Common Name _ c$ tin_ c - n `o ' n t'71 - Ratings S NOTES 1111 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $° (Genoa,aPeciea) u b mow c — c a c E u Spring 2015 Survey >3E� n x x x i x x mi0 n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8ez �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ .6 ¢cgnw° Ea $'c aS uO�Eo °z 348 X X 12.9 12.9 Shamelaeh Faxlnus uh" 45/18 2MO 20%very very poor X poor 349 X X 12.2 12.2 Shamelaeh Faxlnus OM 30/20 2M5 25%very very poor X poor 350 X X 14.2 14.2 Shamelaeh Fraxlnus uhdW 50/15 20/2g 20%very very poor X poor 351 X 14.6 14.6 Shamelaeh Fraxlnus uhdW 30/20 40/25 28%wry poor pporb motl 6 X 352 X 11.1 11.7 Shamelaeh Fraxlnus uhdW 2S/20 10/10 10%vary very poor W W X poor 353 X 17.7 17.7 Shamelaeh Fraxlnus uhM 40/25 35/35 35%poor poor E X 354 X 13.4 13.4 Shamelaeh Faxlnus uhM 3S/20 45as 40%poor poor X 355 X 12.5 12.5 Shamel ash Faxlnus uhM 35/15 20/15 18%very very poor X poor 356 X 18.0 18.0 Shamel aeh Faxlnus uhM 45r30 20/10 15%very very poor W S X poor 357 X 20.8 20.8 Shamelaeh Faxlnus uhM 45145 40150 46%pow M X 358 X 10.9 10.9 Shamelaeh Faxlnus uhM 35/15 0/0 0%deatl E E X 359 X 18.3 18.3 pine species(not pinus P. 30/20 80/55 65%fair good N 0 to 1 foot X 40%overa11 condition"pool'. verlfletl) 360 X 24.4 24.4 Italian stone pine pinus plow 30/35 9"0 77%good excellent 65%overall contlition"fair". 28 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 o a updm,d ovwan condition a E y c S c e + 5cientigc Name U $ tin._ o f = .m c n WLCA Notes from Ratings&NOTES 2017 Common Name yy E u g 8 ._ Spring 2015 Survey ONWARD o q—`e (Genus,species) g e' n i ti d m$W w W B d w E m f ;, °sygF Y m m¢8y5a q - R sl2it= eggg = gad Z'od ]2.ci .E §¢'rco°wn aS 2 2 2 2 2 2 X X Measured at2feel. 65%overall contlition"fait'. 361 X 26.6 26.6 ibiiinaton.pim. Plnus plow 30Y30 60/60 60%few moderate X Mwaured et2fwt. 50%overall contlition"fait'. 362 X 28.6 25.6 nation ebna pima Plnus plus 25/35 Mrs 70%9ood good Treeoutofleaf. Neetle ng 10°/overalPl-e-. Gumus mOre(nor 20/15 80/50 60%air good u,ing. 963 X X 72 7.2 d verMed) n'Nery Tree out of leaf. 5%overall contlition"very 5 Neetls training l 364 X X 5.5 5.5 oak aP..i- Guemde P. 12/8 60/40 40%poor moderate X pruning. Poo'. 10%wemll contlltlon'1rery 365 X X 7.3 7.3 ...tNmmagnolia Magnol/agmrrduitme 18/13 40/40 40%pocr poor to motl X Poop. X M....edat3.5f.et 50%ov.re11conditiom'Yeir. SG6 X 170 17.0 Mien stoma pin. Pin-pinea 18/25 80/50 60%fair good N 20%overall conditlon'Yery 367 X X 24.3 24.1 Italian abn.pin. Plnus pinea 25p0 80/35 4SX pow good N 5 X poor^, Measured of Is 30%overall contlition"poor. 968 X 20.2 20.2 Mien ston,pine Plate;pima 25/30 80/35 45%pocr good N OR 7 X feel. Measured of 2.0 30%ov.rell contlition"poor. 969 % 23.8 23.8 Italian a ton.pine Plnus pinea 25/30 50/50 50%hdr poor to motl 10 feet Vatdy,P.6..in ,prime 4W,full trw spedee out of (Genus,species) 25/15 75/55 65%fair moderate I.afout. 370 X 5.7 5.7 leaf X C.d..In.nC 50%ov.rell conditiom'Teir. 971 X 26.3 16.3 AI.Ppo pine Pin.helepemde 30135 80160 T0%good good malmtams at Sfwt. X 6S%ov.nll contlition'Yeir. 372 X 21.6 18.7 40.1 Italian eWna Pin. P/nus pinea 90Y35 8M0 75X gootl good N 20%overall contlition"very 25%wry X Poor. 973 X X 7.4 7.4 aoWMrn magnolia Magrmlk 9rendlRore 20115 25125 poor poor vary 29 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 updated o..mn condition a E y c S c e + 5cientigc Name U J; c$ O n^ o i m c m m ce v m' c n WLCA Notes from Ratings&NOTES 2017 Comm Name 8 ._ Spring 2015 Survey ONWARD on u IM (Genus.species) g e' ;, °syp = F Y m m8¢ggg5a q - R sgite A''ggg :c'8 aL _ 02 "n - �$ oa = gad Z'od ESc x°'n' id`; �c' ]2.ci - 2- of aE §¢'rca°wn aS 2 2 2 2 2 2 In perking lot of Benikana near F U X X Hyatt construction Project. 3. X X 7.2 7.2 tulip tre. Urbdend70n NIIPMam 12/8 20/10 15�oery very Poor N X Sindis#1225. In parking lot of Benikana near X X Hyan construction project. 975 X X 5.6 5.6 tu0ptr.. UrbobMron NIlPMam 1218 20/10 15P o�ry very Poor X Bandis#1224. 10%overall 000dl0on'Yery 25%very X Poor". 976 X X 5.6 5.6 aoutfprn magnolia Magnol/a gmMlgox 13/10 25/25 poor very,poor 20%overall condition"very X pool'. 377 X X 7.6 7.6 aoutMrn magnolia Magnol/a gmMHlOm 18/12 9Sp5 95X pow poor 20%overa11 conditi-"voiY 20%vary X Poop. 378 X X 7.0 7.0 ...tkern-g-iia MagnotMgmM cne 20/14 20/20 Roo, very poor 20%overall condition"very 35%wry X pool'. k m M ST9 X X 6.5 6.5 ...t.rnagnolia MagnotMgm cne 1//12 2S/25 po.r very poor 20%overa11 condition"very 20%very W X Poor. 380 X X 7.4 1.4 ...tnornmagnolia Ma9n011a9mMlgOrs 20/10 20/20 po.r very poor 381 X 23.0 10.7 37.7 Mien aton.pine Plnus pima, 25/30 75/55 64%feir moderate 5 X 4J%overall contlition"poor. X 53%ov.mll condition'Tair. 982 X 20.8 20.8 Italian abn.pine Plnus plrrea 25/25 70/60 6S%fair moderate 383 X 19.5 19.5 Italian atoi.pin. Pin-plrr.a 25/30 80/65 74%good g.w E OR X NYe overall condition"pool'. X Measured of 2.0 90%averall condition'vair". 984 X 22.0 32.0 Italian a tone Pine Pinus pines 25r30 T0160 65%fair mode- S S feel' X a%averall condition"poor. 385 X 33.2 33.2 Italian a tone pine P/nus plrrw 25/35 60/30 38%poor modeate 8 9 10%overa11 condi l-"very 15%wry 1 X X Pool'. 986 X X 0.5 0.S aoWMrn magnolia "one 9mndlBom 1318 15115 poor vary poor 30 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 Ea o'8°Y 8 crY �a E — $ u8 - u= r c• ~n -'c n Oommon Name SciarIgfic Name i g$ _ »�a v Ic.npa,apeciea) - i oe' 8 a € q; m upaatea overan contlltlon t; x @@ WLCA Notes from m¢r9 `q- aj -9 y d erpW ggc dgo miys� c Gd S RatingsS NOTES 2017 §a'0rc�neLL a8 2 2 2 2 $c$ uSovE g� E. 8�W aY c�8 gg �_' a pang zwssar.ey 2 2 S¢¢ pp g Iu 9 ONWARD -Ag 7.8 southern magnolia MagnWlagmMlgom 18/18 20/20 20%wry poor very poor X 30%overall contlition"poor'. 389 X X 7.5 7.5 a Qutharnmagnolia MagnWlagmndlgom 18/15 20/20 20%wry poor verypoor X 15%overall contlltlon"very pooY'. 389 X 31.9 22.3 54.2 Ialian atone pine Plnus plrraa 30/45 SW40 47%pea mW.a 2 X MYe overall condition"poor'. 390 X 13.2 13.0 26.2 Ibliansbna pine Plnus plrwa 25/15 80Y30 45X poor good N N 9 X 9S%overall cantlifron"poor'. 391 X 12,1 12.0 24.4 Iblianatona pine Plnus pinaa 25Y30 80/60 67X fair good E E 9 X 4SX owmll contlition"poop. 392 X 14.6 14.6 Italian sWna pine Plnus pinea 25/18 80/65 69%fair good E X 40X owmll wntlition"Poo/', m x 14.3 14.3 Icarian sane pine Plnus pinea 20/20 TWO TOX gootl good E X SSX overall contlition'Yaif. 984 X 10.1 10.1 tm spee9s out of leaf/Gen..,sP-ms) 35/20 80/65 75%good goad 985 X 8.8 8.8 tree species out of (Genus,species) 35120 80165 75%gootl Iear good w 396 X X 18.1 18.1 oastr -d Sxluola samp"mns 65/12 TWO 70%9ood moderate Sbep elope 15%overa11contlltlon"very Poor". 397 X X 20.5 20,5 coast retlwaotl Sequels sampwv/yens 65/12 ]W3 TSX gootl moderate Steep elope 25°/.overall contlltlon"vary poor". 398 X 13.4 13.4 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhaN 40/25 8W0 74X good gootl Steep slope 98g X 11.3 11.3 Shamel ash 171-1 us uh" 3Sn5 90/30 9DX poor poor Sbep elope 31 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 updated overan condition a c E y° S c N G o + Scientific Name U c g O n^ o Z i S 9 m m ce v 'm n WLCA Notes from Ratings&NOTES 2017 o E v E c r V °'' u Common Name 8 ._ Spring 2015 Survey ONWARD o #«>' (Genus.species) g e' n i u = gad Z'od ESc mE wn aS 2 2 2 2 2 2 ~ 6 SfieP slope 400 X 21.5 21.5 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhdN 40/25 60/50 0%fair moderate 40t X 202 202 shorn -n Frerinus uhdW 45/20 5005 40%1,00r moderate W 8 10 On steep clops. g On steep clops. 402 X 164 194 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhM 45/25 60/45 55%hir good A03 X 150 150 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhM 40/18 40/40 40%poor poor W 6 8 On steep elope. various On steep slope. 400 X 257 25.7 Shamelash FraXlnus uhM M5 40/40 40%poor poor SW elevations T On steep clops. 405 X 29.5 29.5 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhM 65/35 40Y35 40%poor poor S S On steep elope 25%overall conditlon'Nery /06 X X 17.9 17.9 oast redwood sKools sampav/rerls 50/8 70f70 70%good moderafi Poor' 0 to 10 o%IDead) /07 X X 4.1 Al southininignolia Magnollagmrdlflora 15/1 5/5 5%vary poor very poor various 10%overall condition"very 10 408 X X 5.9 0.8 9.7 soutnornma9nolia Magnollagmrdlflcm 18/6 10110 "oery very poor levations Pool. e X 50%overa11 condition'Tair. COB X 180 18,2 oast redwood Sxluola s—P.W-.s 55/15 65/65 65%hir moderab X 50%overall candition'Yair. 410 X 20.7 20.7 oast redwood Sxluole s—Pewms s5N0 65%5 65No fiir moderate X 40%overall condition"pool'. 411 X 22.4 22.4 coast redwood S"-la samPerv/rens 5M13 60/60 60%hir poor to mod Removed Aug,2919. MA SMme1»h Fradnus hdel fi5r4 65Is5 412 X 32 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 vas Egoo u E " E'c F Scientific Name L 9 e- q+ v m e t.'y WLCA Notes from Uptlatetl Overall Condition s S $e y rc r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o n i'm g - a Ratings&NOTES 2It pr x E y =a c c c c c c _m„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) a: ¢ m u b mow c - c a c E u Spring 2015 Survey m �qc , n x x x i x x miG w m �a 22me qEEa .Faw g Y$$Pc EE ONWARD dEE' = 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae r3a �Lti aQ 2$ 02 U' & of�,$ �'a ¢cq A°wn n8 �'c.A uO�Eo °z .6 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdel M. 50/40 43X pow poor omo Removed Aug,2D19 Wlllneedendwelght Teamprop....to transplant discretionary California reduction pruning at tree.Current condition roughly 414 fransplant X 22.5 22.5 X sycamore P/afanus mcemosa SSIJO 50/45 50%fair motlerate W W GR west side of the same as prevlously notatl In canopy past years. Team proposes to transplant 415 discretionary X 18.3 18.3 X LalMornla plafanus mcemosa 6./J0 50/S0 50%fair motlerate N GR tree.Curren[condi[lon roughly transplant sycamore the same as prevlously notatl In past years. Team proposes to transplant 416 discretionary X 1].8 1].8 X C.Iff nla p/afanus mcemosa 50/20 50/S0 50%fair .,drat E GR tree.Current conditlon roughly transplant sycamore the same as prevlously notatl In past years. 18.2 18.2 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus hdal 30/25 ]SIBS good good Removed per plan August.11. 418 X 11.5 11.5 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus hdal 30/15 45/40 40%poor maderat0 GR Removed per plan August 2019. 17.3 17.3 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdel 35/40 fi0/50 55%fair -ad.-- W GR Removed per plan August 2018. 420 X 11.1 11.1 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdel 35/25 ]SI]D ]0%good good W Removed per plan August 2018. 13.1 13.1 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus hdal 35/25 50/50 50%fair poor to mad Removetl per plan August 2Di9. 422 X 14.3 14.3 SM1amelasM1 Fraxlnus uh- 30/30 75/45 .0%fair good 8 Removed per plan August 2018. 423 X 28.1 28.1 ...at retlwootl Sequoia sempe-a. ]0/20 ]O/TD ].%good maderat0 Removed per plan August 2018. 424 X 33.6 33.6 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempe-a. 70/1. ... .0%fair moderate Removed per plan August 2019. 425 X 24.8 24.8 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 6S115 7W]e 70%9ootl motlerate Removed per plan August 2018. 33 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S �q adao & u a _ oc _ t $ a E E'c F Scientific Name L X o= i 3°- q+ v S c E y WLCA Notes from Uptlatetl Overall Condition s& $c y rc r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ tin_ c - n r w m �_ ° Ratings&NOTES 2011 o m E w po q c v n _ _ _ _ _ _ £. o (Genoa,aPeciea) a: m ra ii W c - c c u Spring 2015 Survey _ g u d _ d L c d m'e i ONWARD a ° a x x x i x s E¢ri . m .a mac as ra° gg Ygc c� °� o E� - w¢',�i 5°E°d= � 2 2 2 2 2 2 -Ea SEe3 gc Sxx eTa n@ 2L o2 ¢Aq A°wLL aouwi uOGEo H s1 1it°f ufin-? .6 X 27.8 27.8 oast retlweod sequoia sempwvlrens 55120 ]5/66 Xgootl m.n. Removetl perplan August 2011. 627 X 17.3 17.3 Shame)asM1 Fraxlnus uhdO 60/20 40140 401pow poor E X Removetl per plan August 2019. Tree m declining.Appears to bo in 40%overall condition(Poor), 428 29.0 29.0 Shamelaah F loos uh" Boas swso 50%fair poor to moil W with..—I leafsenescenco plus twig and bran.h dieback from d-9tht-ind—d decline. is tleclining.Appears to be In 45%overall contlition(Poor), Cotlominant Tree is to be removetl and Shame)asM1 Fraxlnus uhdO S-s 7055 65%fair go ineteme fork at postetl as such as of May,2020 a 13(eel. (approved by City of CupeNno City Staff)in order to acco motlate unforseen ins[allation(s). Merasequaia TREE IS DEAD.TREE 430 X X 27.4 27A giant sequoia glypfosfroboldes ]5/15 66145 55%fair poor b,m*d Tree was limbetl up. REQUIRES REMOVAL FROM THE IANDSCAPE. Tree In decline,with a current 431 27.9 27.9 Shame)ash F—m—uh" 66145 W10 40%poor poor to mod W E 9 oveall condition of 34Y or Poor". Tree In decline,with a current 432 24.0 24.0 Shame)ash F—m—uh" sms 50160 55%fair poor to mod W oveall condition of"Y.or Poot'. Tree in decline,with a current 433 16.9 18.9 Shame)ash Fr..m-uhde! Bons 75160 63%fair good E E overall condition of 50%or "Fait'.("Fait'ranges from 50% Metasequoia 2S%very Roots were severed TREE IS DEAD.TREE 4S4 X X 29.3 29.3 glamspuola glypfosfroboldes 75b2 3=0 poor poor E X during lnsdlla0on REQUIRES REMOVAL FROM W ADAwalkway. THE LANDSCAPE. 25%very Roots swwed 435 % 31.1 31.1 Shame)ash Fnxinus uhdei 85/45 "nopoor poor W GR during sld—.Ik Same condklon as previous. replacement 438 23.0 12.0 35.0 oast redwood Sequoia aempervinns 65/18 76160 65%fair good 3 Diametere estimated. 437 27.7 27.7 Shame)ash F—m—uh" Bono 30M 30%poor poor W 9 Tree currently in th.same onditi0n as previously noted. Roots severed 438 X X 23.5 23.5 Shame)ash F inua uh" 65/18 Bono 37%poor nuderab E during sld—.Ik replacement 34 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB 'E _ C If _ t $ :: a E 'c F Scientific Name L 9 e- q+ v m e p.y WLCA Notes from I oated Overall CondIIIon s& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ tin_ c - n `o ' n i'm g - Ratings& El: 201T x E N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) a: ¢ m u b mow c - c c c E u Spring 2015 Survey >3E� u x x x i x x mi0 n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O o ONWARD 2 dE E8_— e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8ez �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo of ¢cgnwn Ea $'c a4 uO�Eo °z Crown raising 439 X 2T.0 2T.0 oastr -d Sequoias—Pervlrens TS/i6 TWO TO%good good X ri pmnimngwtoIlmb as 4SY.overall condition"poor. P pe up Nils.tree. Condiumnestimated Tree currently In 28%overall .0 X 18.7 18.7 Sham0lash Fra1—uhdW 60Yd0 MS 3S%pow very poor W W 1 prior I.spring condhlon(Very Poor).Tree leafout. suggested by WLCA lobe removed. Roots severed Tree currently In 28%o—roll 441 X 21.2 21.2 Sh—I a,h Fra1—uhdW 60145 Moo 50%fair motlarat0 1 during sidewalk condition(Very Poor).Tree replacement sugg...d byVLCA to be d. Roots sOvered dudn9sidm- Tree appear to b0 in decline. 442 31.2 31.2 Sh—I a,h Fra1—uhdW 60145 60145 53%fair motlarat0 W S replacement.Will Cunentoverallcondifmnis4S need e,d—ight reduction pruning. 443 X 41.0 41.0 oastr -d Sequoias—Pervlrens TWO 75/60 68%fair 9ootl 5 CabolnstalMon 45%overall condition"poor. recommended. 4W 21.5 21.5 Sh—I a,h Fra 1—uhdW SS/30 70150 60%fair moderate W 15.4 15.4 Shame(-1, F—Inus uhdel 60/18 50/50 50%fair moderate N X Removetl as of August 2019. 446 X 21.1 21.1 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervhens ]0/15 ]51]s ]5%go.d gootl Removed as of August 2019. 17.s Shame(asM1 Fraxlnut uhdO 60/20 55/50 52%fair poor to mod N Removed as of August 2019. 15.7 oast redwood sequoia sempervlrens 70/10 6-0 60%fair moderate E Tree was limbed up. Removed as of August 2019. oast redwood sequoia sempervmns 70/10 6-0 60%fair moderate E Treewaslimbedup. Removedasof August2019. 45o X iS.S 15.5 oast retlwootl Sequo/a semperv/rens 70/10 60/SO 55%fair moderab E Trae was limbed up. so%overall condition"fair". 451 X 19.6 19.6 Sham.I ash Fro 1—uhdW SW5 70/55 60%fair 9ood W 35 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 updated o....n condition a E y c S c e + Scientific Name U $ e n._ o f = m c m m n' v _ .m c n WLCA Notea from Ratings&NOTES 2017 o E v E c r V µ°'' u Common Name yy c u c — g ec E u g Spring 2015 Survey ONWARD o q—`n m (Genus,species) g e' d m a lu w W B d lu E m 'c f ;, °sy q F Y m mgga q - R slit= egg ;c'8 aL _ 02 "n ai o� = ga Sod ESQof aE wn aS 2 2 2 2 2 2 re Curnt cantlition rating is F u 0.2 ougM1ly the same as noted in 452 X 21.5 21.5 Shamel aan Fiaxlnus uhdN SSr30 50/35 0%pow poor to motl W previous years. 453 X % 15.0 10 150 6hametasM1 FinasaisuhdW 50/10 10/10 Rn�ry very poor Current condition rating is 12 Roots damaged. ougM1ly th.same as previously a54 X 284 284 Shamel an Fi Imm am" 65/35 SW40 47%pow poor to motl noted in peat Yea.. Roots damaged. ass "T 17.7 Shamel an Fi Imm am" 45/18 30/35 33%pow poor E Same sondl0on ratting w noted 456 X 22.1 22.1 Shamel asM1 Fraxlnus uhdN 60/20 40/35 37%pow poor W W 1S In prior yw.. May be declining in Condition. Cument condition is roughly 45T X 28.5 28.5 Shamel ash Fi Imm uhM 65/35 SW60 W%Pair madwab W 45%(Poor). various Bark-sing all. Same condition rating as noted elevations PMoemlb.rk In prior yea.. MIS X 25.1 25.1 Sbamel ash Fiaxlnus uh" 60/35 30/40 35%pow poor to motl disorder. Roots damaged. 459 X 91.8 31.9 Shamel ash Fi Imm uh" 75/45 60/60 0%Pair mstlerab Roots damaged. 460 918 91.8 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlN 65/95 60/55 58X fair moderate Tree tleclining.Current overall oon E. Is roughly SS%(Pr)oo Extensiv 1S e twig tlleback /61 255 25.5 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlN SS/90 50/50 SOX fair poor to motl apparent. Tree declining.Current overall onditian is rou91ly 2N%(Very Poor).Tissue necrosis and bark a inclusion at lwk—aid Tree.in 15.3 Shamelash F Immua" oils W40 45%pow moderate vry poor cndit be ryec.11 481 X X 15.3 uggest:d too d Tree appears to be in decline Roots damaged. due to chronic drought 21g Shamel ash Fnxinua uhtlei 55/45 ]5/80 ]0%good good W condmirm..Current overall 463 21.0 conditlm rougM1ly 55%(Fair). Tree app..m to be in tlecline do.to chronic tlrought Shamel ash Fnxinua uhtlei 55150 85145 48%pow moderate E 0 to 5 con tli ro.ghly 40 (Poo 464 X 34.1 34.1 centlition rougM1ly 4N%(Poor). 36 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 Ea o'p'Y 8 crY �o E — $ r c• ~n -'c n Common Name Scientific Name i g$ _ °E 8 E a= m P F $ - o » a v (Gana.,apaclea) - i oe' 8 a € q; m updated overdo Condition t; x @@ WLCA Notes from y x x y m¢r9 `q- o� -9 y d opW ggc dgo miys� c �rc :m '- m s RatingsB NOTES 2017 §a'0rc�neLL a8 2 2 2 2 $c$ uSovE g� mp ne �" 8�w �_' a pdng zwssaraey 2 2 iz¢¢ pp g lu 9 ONWARD iae 486 22.8 22.8 Shamel ash Fraxlnsa AM 60f30 SS/95 SO%fair motlwab W ^rite is currently in same 16 Roots tlamegatl. o tlNon as no[etl in previous yoam. 486 29.3 29.3 Shamel a,h Fraxmsa AM Tree appears to be In decline 65Y30 60/45 WXfa'v mail to good E g dim to c,.M.drought onal0 ove on,.Current rall common roughly 40%(poor). 467 tree declmmg.current overall It 35.8 25.8 Shamel ash F inua uhtlei 65/45 Rao 37% condition is roughly 28%(Very poor moderate OR 3.10 Poor).Tissue necrosis and bark ^elusion'a'—noted.Trees in very poor condition are tyaloan augg.—to be removed. Tree declining with apparent extensive twig dieback.Current 468 )( 24.6 24.6 Shane!ash Freah ce shale! me 40140 40% overall condition is roughly 26' pow poor Roots damaged. (Very Poor).Tissue necrosis and bark inclusion at fork noted.Trees in very poor condition are typically auggest1d to be removed. 469 25.2 25.2 Shson.1 h i7nachus uhW! _ 60Y30 40p0 38%pow poor W S OR 12 Rows tlamaged. o tlNon is�neotetl in prevmuc Y.- ding 27.7 27.7 Shamel ash F—mos uh" tons 45/35 40%pow poor Appears to be expedencing normal Fall lea cence (leaf drop).nop). 471 14.9 14.9 Shamel ash Fnxinua uh" oils 45145 45%pow poor W W Appears to be expedencing rrwmal Fail leafserrescerrce (leaf drop). 472 16.4 16.4 Shamel ash Flaxlnua uI— Bono 45145 45%pow poor E Appears to be expedencing normal Fail ddropnescence (leaf drop). 473 31.5 31.5 Shamel ash Fnxinua uh" 60146 ME 68%fair Tree appears o,be somewhat good Ban ( not Roots damaged tleclining.Cur mmerall condition Is roughly 57%(Fair). 474 25.3 0.3 shame(ash Fnxinua uh" Bono Met 65%fair Tree appears to be somewhat good E OR declining.Current overell condition Is roughly 59%(Fair). 476 36.7 Tree Is tleclining.with an 36,7 Shamel ash Fruwre uhdei B0//5 ]OH5 68%fah motlwab estimated d3%overall conditlo Roots tlamaged. rating(poor).Leaf fall appears to be a combo of normal leaf fall plus twig antl branch dleback. 37 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C If _ t $ :: E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 - q+ v m e e y WLCA Note,from Uptlatetl Overall Condition Ea& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ tin_ c - n `o ' n t'71 - Ratings S NOTES 1111 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) u b mow c - c , c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 :a SEe3 go IS as iae 8,z �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ .6 ¢cgnwn n8 $'c.A uO�Eo °z 476 X 15.2 15.2 Sham,la,h Faxlnus uh" 30/2S 35140 38%poor poor to motl E 477 X X 13.9 13.9 Sham,la,h Fraxlnus OM 35120 20/2g 20%very very poor poor 478 X X 16.9 16.8 oactr -d Sequoias—Pervlmns 40/15 SO/50 %%fair poor 20%overa11 co diftn"very poor". 479 X X 22.1 22.1 oactr -d Swluola s—Pervlmns SO/20 0/0 0%d d 0%(Dead). "0 X 13.1 13.1 Sham,la,h Fraxlnus uhM 90/18 45145 45%poor poor SE 481 X 20.0 20.0 Sham,l a,h Fraxlnus uhM 35125 45145 45%poor poor W 462 X 9.8 9.8 Sham,l a,h Fraxlnus uhM MO 30/2g 25%vary poor W poor 463 X 12.7 12.7 Sham,l a,h Fraxlnus uhM 30/i6 SW40 SO%fair .o rate N GR 484 X 15.9 15.9 Sham,l a,h Fraxlnus uhdW 90/18 60150 SS%fair .o rate 485 X 13.7 13.7 Sham,l a,h Fraxlnus uhM 30/20 S5155 SS%fair .o rate E 466 X 22.3 22.1 oactr -d Swluola s—PS mns SO/18 7WO 70%good moderate fib%overall condition 467 X 21.9 21.8 oact red-d Sequoias—Pervlmns 50/18 7WO 70%good moderate 70%overall condition"gootl". 468 X 12.4 12.4 Shame)ash Fraxlnus uhM 30/16 ms 40%pow moderate N 0 to 3 38 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C If _ t $ :: E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 - q+ v m e e y WLCA Note,from Uptlatetl Overall Condition E& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n i'71 - Ratings S NOTES 1111 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) u b mow c - c , c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8a �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ .6 ¢cgnwn Ea $'c.A uOt E'E S 48S X 8.9 8.9 Sham,la,h Faxlnus uh" 30/20 M5 45%poor moderate .0 X 14.3 14.3 Sham,la,h Fraxlnus OM MS SS145 47%poor poor to motl W W 481 X X 9.3 9.3 Sham,la,h Fraxlnus OM 20112 40/20 27%vary poor W W 8 poor "2 X 9.1 9.1 Sham,la,h Fraxlnus uhdW 25118 SM5 40%poor poor to motl E 433 X 12.4 12.4 Sham,la,h Fraxlnus uhdW 30118 45130 35%poor poorb motl W W 434 X 13.8 13.8 Sham,l ash Fraxlnus uhM 3WO 40140 40%poor poor 435 X X 13.0 13.0 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhM 30116 2W20 22%vary poor poor W W 0 to 8 436 X X 7.9 7.9 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhM 25112 30/20 25%vary poor E poor 437 X X 10.2 10.2 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhdW 30/20 2WO 23%very poor poor W W "a X 11.8 11.8 wergreen peer Pyrus kawakamll 20/20 SW40 44%poor poor N 5 FirebligM infection. 435 X X 4.0 4.0 wergre,n peer Pyrus kawakamll 916 010 0%d d No X X 21.4 21.4 oact rW-d Sequoias—Pervlmns SS115 010 0%d d 0%D.d. 501 X X 19.0 19.0 oact rW-d Sequoia s—Pervlmns SS115 15115 15%very very poor X Sbep elope. 0%Dead. poor 39 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C If _ t 8 :: u E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 e- q+ v m e e y WLCA Note,from Uptlatetl Overall Condi[lon x Es& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ tin_ c - n `o ' n i'71 - Ratings S NOTES 1111 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) u b mow c - c , c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 dEE8_- e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8a �Lti aQ 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ ¢cgnwn n8 Ha uO�Eo °z 502 X X 24.4 24.0 ....tr -d Swlrrola s—Pervlmns W12 0/0 0%d d X 0%Dead. 503 X 6.7 6.7 a m,,n pen Pyrus kawakamll 1X14 40140 40%poor poor S 5 504 X 9.9 8.0 18.8 oak,p,cie, a-.-P. 3WO 80/50 60%fair good 3 OR Sbep elope 505 X 32.3 32.1 ....tr -d Swlrrola s—Pervlm.. was 7M0 70%good moderate X Sbep.lope 70%overall wndNon'gootl'. 506 X 10.0 10.0 evergreen pear Pyrus kawakamll 25/15 40140 40%poor poor E E X FirebligM infection. 507 X X 7.6 7.6 wergreen peer Pyrus kawakamll 18/15 20/2g 20%very very poor N N X Firebli,M infectim poor we X 10.8 10.8 vergreen pear Pyms kawakamll 25/25 40fM 35%pon poor N N X FirebligW infection. MR X X 7.2 6.0 5.5 10.6 ...thernmagn.h. MagnoliagmndMom 25/15 15/15 15%very very poor N X poor 510 X 28.0 28.0 ....tr -d S"-I.s—Pervlm.. was 80/80 80%good good X 70%overall...dNon'gootl". R—damag,d on 511 X 14.4 14.4 wergreen pear Pyrus kawakamll 20/25 40150 44%poor poor X grede.Fireblight 55%overall contlition"fail. infection. 512 X 6.0 6.0 ...thernmagn,lia Magnollag.r flom 15/8 Moo 37%pow moderate X X 30%overall contlition"pool'. 513 X 5.6 5.6 southern magnolia Magnollag.r flom 18/10 40140 40%pon poor E X 514 X 4.4 4.4 southern magnolia Magnollag.r flom 1816 40140 40%pon poor E X 40 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 vice Eg o`o S _ C If _ t u E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 e- q+ v m e e y WLCA Note,from Uptlatetl Overall Condition Ee& $c y¢ r c —'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n i'71 - Ratings&NOTES 2011 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 yma SEe3 go as iae t3,z �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ .6 ¢ngnwn n8 ¢G.A 5 'E R z 515 X X 10.5 10.5 evergreen pen Pyres kawakamll 2S/20 30/30 30% 20%overall contllt',,",,ry pow poor E E X FirebligM1[infection. per, 516 X X 10.6 10.6 wergreen pen Pyres kawakamll 2S/20 30/40 35% E E X 20%overall--dil."W,y pow poor Fireblight infection. p-r 51, X X 6.5 6.5 ,outh.rn magnolia Pyres kawakamll 1317 40/30 30%poor poorb motl E 41o7 15%ovna11 co diftn"very poor". Out of leaf.Overall 518 X 21.2 21.2 SM1amel a,M1 Fraxlnus uhtlel 50/30 55I60 SBX fair poor to motl W W contlNon verify in spring after leafout. 519 X 7.6 7.6 oact r -d Sequoia s—Pervlrens 40/10 0/0 0%DEAD Na TREE REMOVED FROM LANDSCAPE 521 X X 20.2 20.2 Sham,la,h Fraxlnus uhM MIS 30/25 28%very poor W poor 522 X 14.3 14.3 Sham,l ash Fraxlnus uhM 35/18 10/10 10%Very Poor very poor W 5 523 TREE REMOVED FROM LANDSCAPE. 524 10.6 10.6 Chine,eelm Ulm-Parvlblla 40/30 7WS 75%good good E X 525 17.6 17.6 Sham,la,h Fraxlnus uhM 40/25 35/35 35%poor poor W W 526 6.7 6.7 Chine,eelm Ulm-Nmftlla 18/12 65150 55%fair mo nft E X 527 8.2 8.2 Sham,la,h Fraxlnus uhdW 20/15 70140 0%fair good 3 S 41 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 Upd -d Oearan condition a m E c S c c n WLCA Noted from Ratings&NOTES 2017 o y ud' u Common Name yy c u c — m.. g ec E u g 8 ._ Spring 2015 Survey ONWARD o q—`e�� (Genus,species) g e' n i m a W w W c f aE §¢'rco°wn aS 2 2 2 2 2 2 528 tt.t tt.t CM1ine»elm Ulmus parvMvlla 25/35 70/60 66%fair moderate X 529 12.T 12.T ShemstaM FrnYlnas uhdW 30/20 4S/95 43X poor poor-mod W W n0 10.4 10.4 CM1ine»elm Ulmus pavifoli. 30/30 75/65 73%good modern- S X 531 82 92 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhM 30/18 SW40 45%poor W 8 592 12.3 12.3 CM1ine»elm Ulm.N'tiolla W40 a5f70 70%good modern- SE X 533 13.2 13.2 Shamel aah Fraxlnus uhM 30/30 60/60 60%hir ni Mnft S94 10.2 10.2 CM1ine»e1m Ulmus NmHolla 40/20 70/60 70%good goad E X Sly 20.6 20.6 Shamel ash F—Inus uhd.1 35/35 60/50 M%hir good 06 X 12.1 12.1 SM1amel asM1 Frazlnus uhtlN 30/20 20120 20%-- very poor 537 13.1 13.1 Chin—elm U/mus Parvdolla 35/35 ao/55 60%hir motlara- E X 538 18.8 19.9 Shamel ash Frax-us uhdN 3Si35 50143 50°hfair poor-mod 538 12.7 12.7 Chi—elm Ulm"NmIliolla 25/30 75/65 70%good good E E X 590 21.8 21.8 Shames»h Raxfrws uhdel 45/45 GW55 60%hir io Mnft OR 42 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 Ea o'p'Y 8 crY ito E — $ c• ~n -'c n Common Name Scientific Name i g$ _ IDena.,aPeclea) - i oa' 8 a € q; m uPaafea overan conalolon t; x @@ WLCA Notesfrom B� EU - iF y x x y m¢t9 `q- o� -9 y d erpW ggc dgo miy'� c �rc :m '- m S Ratings SNOTE52017 §a'0rc�neLL a8 2 2 2 2 $c$ uSovE g� m! ae �" �r8 e.@ "@ 8�W aY c�8 gg Es�&� _'�_' a pang zwssarvay 2 2 S¢¢ pp g lu 9 ONWARD 591 tz.s 12.5 Chinesealm ulmus parvlblla 30/30 60/50 55%fair motlarate x "a 13.7 13.7 Shamel esh FreXlnus AM 95/25 50/50 SOX fa'v motivate W W 593 152 15.2 Shamel aeM1 Faxlnus uhaN 40/25 55/90 34%poor motlerate S OR 5 594 t9.1 14.1 Chineseelm ulmus Parvlsolla 40/35 70/60 67%fair motlmab E E X 595 174 17.4 Sh-1,0 FreXlnus uhaN 40Y30 75/55 64%fair goon W Tighl forks at 6 feel 596 11.2 11.2 Chineseelm ulmus NmImlla 30/35 70/60 66%fair motivab E E X 597 % 12.5 12.5 Shamelash Fraxlnus uh" 40/20 252$ 25%vary poor very Poor W W OR TREE REMOVED FROM LANDSCAPE. !IS 16.3 16.3 Shamelash F—us uhW! 4Sl30 65I55 61%fair motl»ate W 00 17.5 17.5 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlN SOY30 75/65 70%Bootl goon W 02 11.2 11.2 Chineseelm ulmus Nmftlla 25/25 60/60 60%hir motlerate N N X 03 14.2 14.2 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhael 30/2D 7WO 70%gooa goon W W 43 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 Ea o'8'Y 8 crY ita E — $ u8 - u= r c• ~n -'c n Common Name Scientific Name ? q; m updated overdo conalolon t; x @@ WLCA Notes from iF y x x y m¢r9 `q- o� -9 y d opW ggc dgo miys� c �rc :m '- m s RatingsSNOTE5201T §a'0rc�neLL a8 2 2 2 2 E. uSovEIf a ae _mm Gang zwssr.rvey 2 2 S¢¢ 31u W 9 ONWARD S50 b.o Ao elm specie, ulmus P. 20/10 7W5 75%good good Tree out of leaf.l0 not verifietl at lime of writing. 555 X 8.8 0.8 Shamel,,h Fraxlnus uhM 20/15 10/10 10%wry Poor verypoor ato fO 556 16.8 16.8 Shamel aeM1 Fraxlnus uhael 90Y30 SS/80 59%fair moMrate 0 to 1 Vehicle impact scar. 557 12.8 12.0 Shamel aeM1 Fraxlnus uhaN 50/25 95Y35 95X poor poor W W "a 13.8 13.8 Chmeaeelm ulmus parvMolla 35/35 TWO 73%good good N N X SS0 15.8 15.8 Shamel aah Fraxlnus uhaN 50/25 SS/50 SOX fair poor to motl W 560 1f.5 11.5 Chineseelm ulmus parvlblla 30/30 65f70 68%fair moderate E X 561 13.7 13.7 Chineseelm ulmus parvlblla 30/30 70/50 60%fair good N X 562 1}8 1J.8 SM1amer aeM1 F...-uhW 30130 00/38 38%poor poor N X TREE REMOVED FROM LANDSCAPE. w X 10.8 10.8 3lwmel ash Fraxnus uhdN 93/25 2S/20 23%vary poor verypoor W W TREE REMOVED FROM LANDSCAPE. S66 X 17.5 17.1 Shamel aeh Fraxlnus uhael 06/35 Op/I0 4pX poor moderate W W 44 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 z yg�*�, g g: " — •o — e €< t o a updated Overan condition a E y° S c N G o + 6cienti0c Name U c g O n^ o Z i m 9 m m ca v 'm c n WLCA Noted from Ratings&NOTES 2017 o ' u Common Name yy c u c — c m.. oc E u g 8 ._ Spring 2015 Survey ONWARD o #«>' (Genus.species) es n i u d m a W w W ' d on E m f= 0 °syp = F Y m gy5a q - R sitge Ag c'8 a _ 2 "n = gad Spd Egg xe n' id`; ISE 3 :2.ci aE §¢=rco°wn aS 2 2 2 2 2 2 162 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhdN 30/15 25/25 25%, very poor %7 X 16.2 we 18.0 18.0 ShemetaM Po Frerinus uhdW 45/35 7S/65 70%gootl good W we 135 135 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhM 30/25 70/65 68%fair good W 12.7 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhM 18/10 SOY30 40%poor moderate W W % 570 12.T x 50%overa1Icondafo'Ur. 371 227 22.7 oastr ooa Spuola sampwwmns 55/20 60/60 60%hir moderate 572 316 31.6 oasts ood Spuola s—P"W-ns 55/20 60/45 55%fair ni Mn e 25 X 60%overall contlition'Yeir. 3c s7x oaenn eomitmn••poor. 573 16.5 16.5 oast ni wood Spuola ssmpwWrens 50/15 60/50 S3X fair moMrate % 0%overall contlition"poor. 574 256 25.6 oaet redwood Spools s—P.W—s 55/15 60/60 60%fair ni Mnte X 35%overall contlition"Poor . 575 120 12.0 ...[real Spuola s—P.M—s 35/10 60140 47%poor mo4.nte % 65%ovenill condition"fair. 576 32.1 13.4 12.2 $7.7 oast retl d SpuolessmPwvlmns 55/25 70170 70%gootl poor vadou8 % 45%overall contlition"poor'. 577 276 27.6 oast retl d Spuola sempsMrens SONS 40M 35%P Poor alavadons x 50%overa11 condition'Yair. 575 171 17.1 oaetn ood Spuola s—P.W—s 30112 60/60 60%fair moderate X 40%overall condition"pool'. 579 177 1i7 asi redwood Spuola semPervkens -12 65165 65%bir motlarafe 45 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 updated overan condition a E y c S c e + scientific Name U $ tin._ o f = m c m m n' v _ .m c n WLCA Noted from Ratings&NOTES 2017 o E v E c ' u Common Name 8 ._ Spring 2015 Survey ONWARD o q—`e (Genus,species) g e' rg i u d m a W w W B d lu E m f = gad Z•od -ESc2 of aE wn aS 2 2 2 2 2 2 X ss%overan conaigon••fair. 58o 315 80 40.5 oaetrWwootl Sprrola samparvinns 60/20 7WS 75%good moderate X q5X overall contlition"poor. 581 21.5 10.5 32.0 coastr ood Spools samparalnrls 60/15 60/60 60X fair motlwate X 60X overall contlition'Yeir. %12 311 31.7 oaet rW d spuola sampervlmns 70/25 80/80 80X pootl Oootl 20% ondltion'.very g,y oaet rW d Saquola s—P.Wmns 9S/6 20/20 30 ooery very poor X pooY'. 583 X 8.3 X 50%overa11c dhion'Yair. S84 26.8 26.8 oast rW d Saquola samperv—s 10/20 65/65 65%fair ni Mn e X 50%overall conaition'Yeir. 584 15.8 7.3 23.2 oastr ood Sagrmla sampervlmns 50/15 65/65 65%fair ni Mn e X 45%—.it wndtion"Poor. 586 253 25.1 oaetr ooa Segrmla samperv—s 50/13 65/65 65%fair moaerafe X 52%overall condition'Yeir. 58] 18.8 18.8 oaetr ooa sprmla s—P.M—s 50/14 65/65 65%fair moawafe X 47%overall condition"poor. 58e 210 21.0 oaetr ooa sagrmla samperv—s 50/12 60160 60%fair mo4onft X 62%overall condition"fair. ggg 233 23.1 oaet redwood sprmla sampeMrens 60/12 65/65 65%fair moaorafe X 35%overall conaitian•'poo!'. no 25.5 5.0 30.5 oactn ooa sprmla sampwvirens 60H0 30145 35%Poor pow X 50%overall condition"fair. 581 212 21.2 osatr ooa sprmla sampaMrens 55/10 50140 45%pow poor ma rewotl Squoia 28%v ry 51 X 25.0 25.0 3 Poor X SOX fair as of]I28I2020. poor 46 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C If _ t $ :: a E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 a- q+ v m e e y WLCA Note,from Uptlatetl Overall Condi[lon Ea& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ tin_ c - n `o ' n i'71 Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) u b mow c - c c c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8,z �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ .6 ¢cgnwn Ea $'c.A uO�Eo °z 583 14.4 14.0 oact r -d SeBuola s-Pervlrons 40/10 30/30 30%poor poor b motl 3 0 to 5 X 40%poor as of]I2812g20. 584 18.1 18.1 oactr -d SeBuola s-P-1mns W13 65/55 50%fair ih Mrate X 50%fair ae of 712312620. 585 18.2 18.2 Deaf rWwootl Spuola sempervlrons 25115 40/25 30%poor moderate merisrom251aplcal X 50%fair ae of 112312620. ) 586 12.8 12.8 oact r -d Swluola s-P-1mns SS/8 SW40 t5%poor poor b motl S X 20%very poor as of 7/28/2020. 587 X 12.7 8.3 21.0 oact r -d Swluola s-P-1mns 35/10 0/0 0%d d dead 1 X Deatl as of]12812020. Shear crack May ba as high as 90%poor ae "a X 18.5 18.5 Deaf rWwootl Sequoia sempervlrons 50/6 90/10 20%vary very poor X through the of 712w2020.But shear crack poor malnsromly. tlowngratles cenditicn rating. longitudinal no 27.0 27.0 oact rW-d Sequoias-P-1mns 75MS 65/65 65%fair .o rate X 50%fair ae of 112312620. Cankerdevelaping 600 18.8 18.8 oact rW-d Sequoias-P-1mns 6518 SW40 t5%poor poor W X on trunk at 5 feet 30%peorasof112812g20. ,Iwation. 601 25.5 25.5 oact rW-d Sequoias-P-1mns 70/14 40/40 40%poor poor X 30%poer as of712812020. 602 13.7 7.7 21.9 oact red-d Sequoias-P-1mns 40/8 40/30 35%pow BRC X 30%overall condition"pool'. 603 X 17.3 17.1 oact red-d Sequoias-P-1mns 50/15 25MS 25%very 25%overall contlltion"very poor very Poor X pool'. 604 X 16.7 16.7 oact red-d Sequoias-P-1mns W12 25MS 25%very 25%overall contlltion"very poor very Poor W X poor". 605 X 6.6 6.6 oact rW-d Sequoias-P-1mns 3W 25MS 25%vary very poor X 0%)Deatl) poor 47 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`a Eg oB S �q adao & u a _ F' _ C oc _ t $ :: u E E'c F Scientific Name L X o= i 9 e- q+ v m e E y WLCA Notes from Ip aatetl Overall Contlltlon x Es& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n i'm g - a Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 4444 y a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,specie.) a' ¢ m u b ra o w c - c a c E u Spring 2015 Survey >3E� a x x x i x x mit5 n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFcE� O o ONWARD 2 dE E8_- e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 y:a SEe3 go Is as iae 8a �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo ¢12 n lua n8 TEE iA uO�Eo °z 606 X 26.4 26.0 ...t ra -d Sequoia sempervirens 60/18 20/3p 25%vary n�dominant 25%overall contlltlon"very poor paor X i lam fork rt 20 pcer, feet 607 X 15.4 15.0 ...t ra -d Sequoia sempervirens 55/10 1S/20 17%very 15%-wall contlltlon"very poor very Poor X poor. 608 X 22.0 22.0 oast ratlwoatl Sequoia sempervirens 60/14 90/30 30%poor poor W X 37%overa11 contlltlon"very poor". 609 27.1 27.1 ...t ra -d Seriuola sempervirens 70/18 35/35 35%I,a" poor X 30%overall condition"poor. 610 X 13.0 13.0 ...t ra -d Seriuola s_Parvlrens 3" 40/20 28%vary pgorb motl X 35%overall contlitlon'Nery poor poor. 75%overa11...dhion'gootl'. Tree was severely pruned by property owner to the at, Cankers on W nk at which removetl all of Me 61t 98.0 98A oast.—ad Sequoia semcervirens ]5115 7Mp 70%pond good X Bfwt ertw facing.caffold limb,. wHealth and sWclural rating. significantly reducetl arbelow the condition rating n..d above. 0%(Dead)Tree was severely pruned by property owner to the west,which removetl all of X 8.0 8.0 ..straw Sequoia semcervlrens 25/4 0/0 0%dead dead the we—nd facing scaffold Ilmbs. REMOVED AS OF OCTOBER 2018. Tree rely prunetl by property owner to the west, 613 26.5 26.5 oastretlwood sequoia semcervirens 75118 7WS 75%good goad X hhi.h removetl all of in. and facing scaffold limb,. wHealfM1 and stroctural ratings significantly reduced Tree rely prunetl by property owner to the—at, 614 32.3 32.3 oastretlwood sequoia sempervirens 65/16 70l/0 70%good mod to good X hi.h removetl all of in, and facing scaffold limb,. wHealfM1 and siroclural ratings significantly reducetl a o n po . Tree rely prunetl by property owner to the—at, 615 15.4 15.4 oastretlwood sequoia semcervirens mile 50150 50%fair poor X .h removetl all of in. and facing scaffoltl limbs. wHealth and stroctural ratings significantly reducetl n poo . Tree •rely prunetl by property owner to the west, 616 24A 24A oastretlwood sequoia sempervirens 65/11 55150 53%fair mod X hi.h removetl all of the and facing scaffoltl limbs. wHealth and siroclural ratings significantly reducetl a n pal. . Tree rely'pruned by rty owner prope to tho west, 61] 10.1 10.1 oastretlwood sequoia sempervirens 25/9 65/46 55%fair mod X mh removetl all of the and facing scaffoltl limbs. wHealth and structural ratings significantly reducetl 48 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`m Eg oB S IT _ m E E'c F Scientific Name L S m- q+ v a c l°y WLCA Note,from Uptlatetl Overall Condition x Es S $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ tin_ g - Ratings&NOTES 2017 „ y a c c c c c c _mm„ $m (Genoa,apaches) a: ¢ m u d c e g c E _ u Spring 2015 Survey m °�' E m x x x i x x mit5 m m �a ggm ae qa .Fa°w g pppppp - ns `off dEEw ��° ,�i ._ca ONWARD 2 dE E$ = J. 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go ma io?� �L� nQ 2 e'2 UOo & of ,� ¢cgawnm a$ �'c sS uO�Eo °z e-can Treerty owner¢rely prunetl by prope to the west, 618 26.7 26.7 oact reotwead Sequoia s-Pee inns 70/18 SW60 58%fair poor to motl X which removetl all of the we facing scaffold Ilmbs. Health and structural mtings w slgniflcantly reduced n Poo . Tree erelY Prunetl by property owner to the west, 619 12.5 12.5 oact reotwead Sequoia samparvlrens 45/10 SW40 50%fair moderate X which removetl all of the westward facing scaffold Ilmbs. Health and structural mtings w slgniflcantly reduced n pmo . Tree ¢rely prunetl by property owner to the west, 620 15.3 15.1 oact reotwead Swlaola s-Pend- 35/10 SW40 50%fair moderate X which removetl all of the westward facing scaffold Ilmbs. Health and structural mtings w slgniflcantly reduced Tree erelY Prunetl by property owner to the west, 621 12.6 12.6 oaet redwead Sequoias-Panel- 45/11 60150 55%fair moderate X which removetlall of he westward facing scaffoltl Iftn". Health and structural mtings w slgniflcantly reduced 622 23.4 23.0 oact reGwootl Sataola semparvlrens 7S/15 5W50 50%fair poor X 55%overall contlition"fait'. 623 25.1 25.1 oact reGwootl Sataola semparvlrens 7S/15 5W50 50%fair poor X 57%overall cmntlition'Yair". 6. 15.9 15.8 oact reGwootl Sataola semparvlrens 70/12 SW40 0%pow poor X 50%overall contlition"fair. 625 19.7 6A 26.1 oact retlwoad Sataola semparvlrens 6S/10 5W50 50%fair poor X 50%overall condition'Yair". 626 19.6 19.6 oact retlwoad Sataola semparvlrens 60/10 60150 55%fair poor W motl X 50%overall condition"fair". 627 22.9 22.8 oact retlwoad Saquola semparvlrens 7S/12 60150 53%fair poor X 60%overall condition'Yair". 628 X 19.1 14.1 oast retlwood S la sem bens .1. 2W. I re emmend tree be removetl ¢quo pery Worry very poor X at [his lime.O will -CA).SHPCO will remove. 629 X 11.9 11.8 oastr-ad Sequoia sempervlrens a- 1.10 71- 630ry 0%(Dead).TREE REMOVED AS poor very poor X OF OCTOBER 2018. X 12.0 12.0 oaetrWwootl Spools sampeMrens 9S/10 9S/35 95%poor or X 25%overall condition"very poor. 49 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C oc _ t 8 :: u E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 e- q+ v .c C y WLCA Not-from Uptlatetl Overall Condition x Ee& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ tin_ c - n `o ' n i'71 a Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 4444 y a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,specie.) E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 :a SEe3 go IS as iae 8ez �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo ¢cgnw' n8 Ha uO�E. °z 691 X 16.2 16.2 .actr o.d Sequoia sempervlmns 4S/15 2g/20 20%vary very poor 2g X 20%overall contlltlon poor "very poor'. 632 1" 15.5 oastr o.d Sequoia sempervlmns MIS .0 35%poor po--d 30 X 30%ovwall cantlition"pool'. 20%overall contlition"very X 9.9 oast redwood sequoia sempervlrens 40/10 35/35 35%poor p. pool'.TREE REMOVED AS OF OU.SER 2018. 634 X 11.5 11.5 .actr ood Swluola sampervlmns W12 2g/20 20%very 10%overallcondItlon'Nery poor very poor X Poor,. 635 X 18.4 18.0 .actr ood Swluola sampervlmns W12 10/10 10%very verypoor X 0%(Dead) poor 636 X 20.9 20.8 .act r o.d Sequoia sempervlmns 70/18 2M5 25%very 18%overall co.ditlon(very poor very Poor X poor). 637 X 13.8 13.8 .actr o.d S la sem Imns 50/15 2M5 25%very Orn�ofms wa lwo equo pery poor very poor X movatas 5h overall contlition(very poor) l at grad.. 638 27.9 27.8 .actr o.d Swluola samp.rvlmns 80/25 7WS 75%good mod to good X 68%overall...dition(fair). 638 X 10.8 10.8 .actr o.d Sequoia sempervlmns 3W 2M5 25%very vpor DlfRt t 18%verall contlltlo po.r vllsuallY. "very poor'. 640 21.1 21.1 .actr o.d Sequoia sempervlmns 70/12 40140 40%poor poor W X 30%overa11 cantlition"poor. 641 19.6 19.6 .actr ood Sequoia sempervlmns 60/12 65155 60%fair moderate N X t5%overall contlition"pool'. 642 30.3 30.1 .actr ood Sequoia sempervlmns 7SI20 swso 50%fair moderate X 42%overall contlition"poor. 643 24.3 24.1 .act redwood Sequoia sempervlmns 70/18 60155 56%fair moderate X 50%overall contlition 50 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C oc _ t $ :: a E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 e- q+ v m e e y WLCA Notes from Uptlatetl Overall Condition x Ee& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ tin_ c - n `o ' n i'71 - Ratings S NOTES 1111 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) u b mow c - c a c E u Spring 2015 Survey >3E� o x x x i x x mi0 n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 :a SEe3 go as iae 8ez �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ .6 ¢cgnwn Ea $'c aS uO�Eo °z 694 tt.t it.t oastr -d Swluola s—Pervlmns W12 50/5O fair poor X 40%overall contlition"poor. 695 22.8 22.8 oast rWwootl Sequoia sempervlmns 70/12 40/35 39%poor poor X 25%overall contlltlon"very poor". 646 X 14.8 7.5 22.1 oact redwood Sequoias—Pervlmns 50/10 4 O 27%vary Sdrunkformat 24%overall contlltlon"very poor poor W X oedaln heights. poor". 647 31.5 31.5 oact r -d Swluola s—PS mna 75/25 80/80 80%good good X 70%overa11 condNon 698 X 0.8 0.8 Deaf rWwootl Spools sempervlmns 25I5 90Y30 30%poor poor S X 17%overa11 condltlon'Yery poor". 649 25.7 25.7 oact rW-d Sequoias—Pervlmns 6S/12 50/SO 50%fair nn Mrs X 50%overall contlition 650 22.4 22.9 oact red-d Sequoias—Pervlmns 6S/i6 50/SO 50%fair and ra X 50%overall contlition 651 29.6 29.6 oact red-d Sequoias—Pervlmns 70/20 60140 55%fair and ra X 67%overall contlition 652 15.9 15.9 oact red-d Sequoias—Pervlmns 6S/i6 40/40 40%poor poor X 45%overall contlition"pool'. 653 X 16.0 16.0 oact red-d Sequoias—Pervlmns 60/10 20/2g 20%vary very poor X 0%tDead) poor 654 X 20.5 20.5 oact red-d Sequoias—Pervlmns SS/6 30115 20%vary 16%ovxall contlltlon"very poor very poor X pool'. 655 25.0 10.0 35.0 oact red-d Sequoias—Pervlmns 70/15 50/SO 50%fair poor.motl 3 X 50%overall condition'Yair. 656 27.3 27.1 oact red-d Sequoias—Pervlmns 7S115 60140 50%fair poor.motl 6 X 56%overall condition'Yair. 51 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C oc _ t $ :: u E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 e- q+ v m e e y WLCA Note,from Uptlatetl Overall Condi[lon Ee& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ tin_ c - n `o ' n i'm g - Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) a: m u b mow c - c c c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 dE E8_- e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 :a SEe3 go as iae 8,z �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ .6 ¢cgnww Ea $'c iA uO�Eo °z 65, 19.8 19.8 oactr -d Se9uola s-Pervlrens 70/15 45145 45%pow poor W X 48X overall cantlition"poor. 658 30.8 30.8 oactr -d Se9uola s-Pervlrens 70/18 30/35 30%pow poor 4.8 X t5%overall cantlition"pool'. 659 X 10.0 10.0 oactr -d Sxluola s-Pervlrens 3514 0/0 0%d d dead X g%(Dead) 660 X 23.0 23.0 oactr -d Sxluola s-P,-1mna 70/15 30/20 25%very S4..kform poor very poor X between 60 and 65 30%overall condition"poor'. 1-10veti0n. 661 X 12.0 12.0 oaetrWwootl Spuola sempervlrens 90/8 SOY30 95%pow moderate 20 X 28%overall conditlon'Yery poor". 662 17.7 17.7 oactr -d Se9uola s-Pwv1mns 50/15 60145 %%fair nn Mrs X 50%overall condition'Yair. 663 11.2 11.2 oactr -d Se9uola s-Pwv1mns 50/10 55IS0 50%fair poor.motl X 40%overall contlition"poor. 664 11.0 11.0 oact redwood Se9uola s-Pwv1mns 50/10 50/SO 50%fair poor X 40%overall contlition"poor. 665 20.4 20.4 oact redwood Se9uo1a s-Pwv1mns 65118 60155 58%fair and ra X 59%overall condition'-r". 666 20.9 20.8 oact redwood Se9uola s-Pwv1mns 70MS 40150 45%pow poor X 45%overall contlition"poor. 667 16.7 16.7 oact redwood Se9uola s-Pwv1mns 65118 40150 t5%pow poor X 40%overall cantlition"poor. 668 9.1 9.1 oact redwood S"-1.s-Pwv1mns 4M 30/35 35%pow poor X 30%overall cantlition"poor. This tree has a PG&E guy strap and Its trunk which may 10%overall contlition"very 669 X 9.9 9.9 oast redwood S"-1.s-Pwv1mns Orr 30MO 30%pow poor X -t-fly g1mle the pool'. stem,possibly ausing loss of -1,111ty within the stem cross sedlo.. 52 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB 'E �q adao & u a _ F' _ C oc _ t $ :: u E 'c F Scientific Name L X o= i 9 e- q+ v m e P.y WLCA Notes from Ipdated Overall CondIIIan e& $c y¢ r c —'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n i'71 a Ratings&NOTES 2017 x E N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) e m u b mow E u Spring 2015 Survey >3E� u x x x i x x mit5 n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O E��o ft ._ ONWARD 2 dE E8_- eM 2 2 2 2 2 2 :a SEe3 go as iae 8a �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo of ¢c4nwn Ea $'c iA uO�Eo °z US X 10.7 10.7 oactr -d Sarluola s—Pand... 4016 20/20 20%very 15%overall contlltlon"very poor very Poor X poor". 671 X 7.1 7.1 oactr -d Saquola s—Pandmns 3016 2525 25%very 15%ovwall contlltlon"very poor very Poor X poor". 672 X 14.8 14.8 oast rWwootl Sequoia sempervlmns 50/12 40/40 0%pow poor X 25%overall contlltlon"very poor". 673 22.2 22.2 ShamelasM1 Fraxlnus uhtlel Sons 30/35 33%pow poor X 6. 24.2 24.2 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel SS125 35140 36%pow poor X 675 X 15.0 15.0 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 50/15 20/00 25%very At all poor very Poor alevatlons. X 676 16.6 16.6 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 65118 3WO 30%pow very poor Various X alavztlons 677 X 17.6 17.6 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 65118 10/10 10%very At all poor very Poor elevations. X 678 1 4 13.4 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 60/18 45/45 45%Pow poor.motl E X sing re..-d in January 2019 tlue.requirement to move 12.7 12.7 Shamel asM1 Faxlnus uhtlel E PGE high voltage untlerg .d cult sad associatetl conduit toward this tree. 680 15.6 15.6 Shamel ash Frax/n-uhtlel 60/25 M's 40%pow poor.motl E X 681 17.3 17.3 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel 65125 45145 tS%Pow motlera. E X 682 14.2 14.2 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhtlel ms 4SYd0 9SX pow poor.motl E 8 X 53 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 updated ovaran condition a c E y° S c N G o + 5cientigc Name U c g O n^ o Z i m 9 m m ce v 'm n WLCA Notes from Ratings&NOTES 2017 o E v E E r V °'' u Common Name 8 ._ Spring 2015 Survey ONWARD o #«>' (Genus.species) g e' n i u = ga=iA Sob Enac ~ aE w ~ n aS 2 2 2 2 2 2 Possible 15X very to 6 deshbfllaed root 683 X 18.) 187 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhWl 65/30 25/10 poor very poor E E 5 X plRemovek tree. 5%vary X 684 X X 12.2 12.2 ShemstaM Fraxlnus uhWl 50/20 15/15 Pom very Poor 15%wry E E X 05 X X 10.5 10.5 Shamelash Fraxlnus uhM 45/20 15/15 poor very poor x 59X overall contlition'Yeir. Gas X 6.0 t0 oast redwood S"oole semparvlmns 15/6 50/50 SOX hir moderate 07 x 114 114 Shamelash Fr Imm uhM 45/25 40/35 37%poor poor to motl E E X x 65%overall contlition'Yair. 688 x 0.5 q5 oast mdlwood S"wI8 semio"Wmns 20/8 70f70 70%good mW.m1m 10%very E E x 689 X X 15.8 15.8 Sbamel ash Fraxlnus uhWl 65/20 10/10 poor very poor x 65%overall condition'Yair. 690 X 4.9 A9 oact m lwood Sarloole semwwmns 18/6 70f70 70%good mW.m1m 5%vary E X x 681 X X 10.8 10.8 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhWl 95/25 iS/15 poor very poor 682 X 22.5 22.5 Shamel ash Fr Imm uh" 75/35 65/50 %%hir mod to good E E X 683 X 28.0 18.0 Shamelash Fmndmson" 70140 65158 57%hir modtogood E E 8 X 684 x X 21.3 21.3 Shelash Fr Imm uftW 70/35 40/40 40%poor poor 8 am Roots severetl with x assay,on west aiae 695 x 28.3 28.3 Shames»h Finud s uhW( 70r35 60150 55%hir mmderMm E E of root system. 54 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 vice Eg o`o S _ C IT _ t a E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 e- q+ v m e e y WLCA Notes from Uptlatetl Overall Condition Ea& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - A `o ' n t'71 - Ratings S NOTES 2011 N 444p44 =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) c E u Spring 2015 Survey >tg � n x x x i x x mi0 n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 :a SEe3 go as iae 8ez �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ .6 ¢cgnwn Ea $'c aS 5 'E E, z 696 X 23.9 23.9 Shamel ash Fraxlnua uhdW TWO SO/50 50%fair poor.motl E X 697 X 25.3 25.3 Shamel ash Fraxlnua uhdW TWO 45/35 43%poor poor.motl E OR 11 X 698 X X 8.2 8.2 oactr -d Sequo/a sempervirens 28/10 SW60 55%fair poor.motl X 10%ovxall contlltlon"very poor". X 8.4 8.4 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 2.10 010T.%-d d-d X OY.(DOCTOBEMOVED. OF OCTOBEROVED. Poll 700 X X ].5 7.5 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 2.10 0/0 0%d d d.d X OY.(D OCT REMOVED OF OCTOBER.,2018.. 701 X X 8.2 8.2 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 25/T 40/40 40%poor poor X 0%J( atl).REMOVED AS OF OCTOBER.,2018. X 8.1 8.1 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 25/T 1.10 10%very 0%(Deatl).REMOVED AS OF poor very poor X OCTOBER.,2018. dL 703 X 20.3 20.1 oact retlwootl Sequoias-Pervlrens 40/20 40140 40%poor poor.motl X 50%overall contlition 7" X 11.3 11.3 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 3W 0/0 0%d d dead x 0%(Dead). 4%overall contlition"vary 705 X 10.3 10.1 oaet r -d Sequoia sempervlrens 30/4 5/5 5%vary poor very poor X poor".REMOVED AS OF OCTOBER,2018. 706 X 11.0 11.0 oact retlwootl Sequoia sempervirens 30/8 10/10 10%very 13%overall contlltlon"very P.., very poor 1 X poor". 707 X 5.8 5.8 oaciretl d Sequoia sempervlrens 25/6 10/10 10%very 7%overall contlltlon"very poor very Poor X poor". TOB X 11.5 11.5 Deaf retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 90/8 40/40 40%poor poor X 15%--H contlltlon"very poor". 55 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg at _ C oc _ t $ :: a E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 e- q+ v m e P.y WLCA Note,from URIatetl Overall Contlltlon s& $c y rc r c —'o u Common Name _ c S tin_ c - n >, w w g �_ Ratings&NOTES 2017 N E y po q c v n — — — — — — £. g o (Genoa,aPeciea) a: ¢ m u b E — 8 u Spring 2015 Survey ONWARD $ gm'e ap°i rn "pFc n� oG om Ecru 5°E°d= eI 2 2 2 2 2 2 "a 6Z'Ee3 go Wa ide �2 �2.� n 2$¢cq o°wn n8 �'cS uO�Eo TREE REMOVED FROM LANDSCAPE. 710 12.3 12.1 oactr -d Segtmla s—Pervlrens 3518 40140 40%pow X 35%overall contlition"pool'. 711 X 11.3 11.1 oactr -d Sxltmla s—Pervlrens 4014 Iwo 10%very very poor X 9%(Dead). poor 712 8.4 8.4 oactr -d Sxltmla s—Pervlrens 30/8 30Y30 30%poor poor X 30%overall condition"pool'. 713 11.4 11.0 oactr -d Sxltmla s—Pervlrens 3516 40140 40%poor poor X 40%overall contlition"poor. 714 X 7.3 7.9 oactr -d Segtmla s—Pervlrens 3016 15115 15%very 15%overall contlltlon"very poor very Poor X pool'. 715 19.5 19.5 oast rW-d Segtmla s—Pervlrens MIS 45145 45X poor poor X 35%overall contlition"poor. 716 X 0.9 0.9 oast retl d Sequoia sempervirens 1715 010 9%tleatl dead X 0%(Dead). 717 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 30l] 20120 20/very very poor moved by SHPCO In 2017, poor DEAD. 718 ].0 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 2- Om 0%tleatl tleatl X movetl by SHPCO In 2017, DEAD. 719 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens -Is - 0%tleatl tleatl X movedby SHPCOIn2017, DEAD. 720 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens SOI] 010 0%tleatl tleatl movetl by shp..2019 d-to death of tree. 721 X 15.3 15.3 °astredwootl Sequoia sempervirens 50/12 10/10 10/very very poor X 10%overa11 contlltlon"very poor pool'. 56 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C If _ t $ :: a E E'c F Scientific Name L X o= i 9 e- q+ v m e P.y WLCA Notes from Updated Overall CondIIIan Ee& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ li n_ c - n `o ' n i'm g - Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 4444 y a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aP-Ae.) e ¢ m u b mow c - c c c E u Spring 2015 Survey >33� n x x x i x x mit5 n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 dE E8_- e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 :a SEe3 go as iae 8a �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo ¢12 A.lu n E a $'c iA F, 'E S z ]22 X 11.5 11.5 coactr -d Saq-la s—Pand... 50f10 20120 20%vary very poor X 17%ovxall condltlon"very poor poor". w%oxeren aanditix'poor. Montereypine Plnus mtllata 0 50/40 48%pocr maderata E Being removed December 2018 (or[ran.hing PG&E electrical. 7. X 13.8 13.8 oactr -d Saquola s—Pandmns S0/8 MIS 15%very Poor X 15%ovxall condltlon"very poor very poor". Tree rem.ad as of 2014 by SHPCO due to propeny owner X 22.0 22.0 Monterey pine Plnus radfata 55/25 3.40 38%poor poor X to west request in order to stop Ixf litter from dropping into hie swimming pool. Trea....gad as of 2014 by 28%vary SHPCO due to property owner X 20.8 20.8 Montereypine Plnus rstllaW 50/25 30125 poor very poor SE SE X to west request in oMer to s top Ixf litter from dropping into his swimming pool. 727 X 13.5 13.5 oaet redwood Sao—sempervlmns 50f12 40/25 30%pocr poor X 15%overall condltlon"very pooY'. oast redwood Sequoia sempervlrens -10 10/15 13%very very poor movetl by SHPCO In Poor DEAD. 728 8.0 8.0 oactr -d Saquola sempervlmns 40/S fi0130 45%poor moderate X 35%overall condition"poor. 730 14.0 14.0 oact redwood Saquola s—Pandna.. Safe 50/50 50%fair moderate X DlRicult to assess 40�o overall condition"poor. ..ally. 731 X X 14.7 14.7 Shamel an Fraxlnus uhdW SSf23 23f25 25%vary very poor E E X poor mel sM1 a Fraxlnus uhtlel ry death or tlue to propeny 24.1 24.1 SM1a owne poor very poor E GR 7 X to west requesting removal to stop leaf litter falling into swimming pool. Removed by SHP-between 2014 and 2017 anh,due to tree SM1amel asM1 Fraxlnus uhtlel 0 40Y35 38%poor lfoot(ca death or due to propeny owner to west requesting removal to stop leas litter caning into swimming pool. Circling roots. 734 17.1 17.1 Sham0l an Fraxlnus uhM 4S/30 3Sf33 35%poor poor X Roots damaged on grade. 57 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 o a updated ovwan condition a E y c r5 c e + 5cientigc Name U $ e n._ o f = v _ .m c n WLCA Notea from Ratings It NOTES 2017 o E v E is r V µ°'' u Common Name .. g ec E u g 8 ._ Spring 2015 Survey ONWARD o q—`e m (Genus,species) g e' n i u d m a W w W B d lu E m f ti = ga Sod ESQ aE in aS 2 2 2 2 2 2 ~ 20%vary E 1 foot(car X ]l5 X 17S 175 Shemel asM1 Fraxlnus uhdN SS125 20/20 poor very poor Impact) 35%vary Vadous X 18.1 SMmstaM Frarinus uhdN 45/35 25/25 Pow very Poor 736 X 19.1 alovatlons. 20 X Roots severed-it pg 7 Shemel ash Fraxlnus uhM Swo 30/40 35%pow poor E damaged on grade. 737 20.) 738 211 217 Shemel ash Fraxlnus uhdN SOpO 40/90 0%pow poor S OR X 35%vary E X 738 X 23.) 29.) Shemel asM1 Fraxlnus uhdal 6Sp0 25/25 poor very poor Tog 26.0 26.0 Shemel aeh Fraxlnus uhdal 45Y35 65/50 S6X fair flood X OR X X X X X 741 245 24.5 Shemel ash Fravinus uh" swo 40/40 90%pow poor Various X X 742 272 27.2 Shemel ash 171-1 us uhdal SOY30 W40 0%pow motlwate eI vatlon. X X 743 30.1 30.1 Shemel ash Frazlnus uh" SW40 60145 50%fair modereb SSY30 50/90 4SX pow moderate X Instem X X Roo..In-.near 799 X 23.2 25.2 Shemel ash Frazlnus uhdal . 745 X 14.2 14.2 Shemel ash FraXinus on" awn 35150 35%p poor X g X X 796 291 14.1 Shemel aeh Frazlnus uhdN 50/25 60/50 SS%fair moderate E X X GR various X 797 18.6 Me shiono h Finud suhMf OW25 W130 38%pow modes E akvatlons 58 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C oc _ t $ :: E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 - q+ v m e e y WLCA Note,from Uptlatetl Overall Condi[lon E& $c y¢ r c —'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - o. `o n i'm g - Ratings S NOTES 2017 N 444p44 =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) u b mow c — c 0 c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEa .Faw g YRpFc _ ns E� EE E��o fr ._ ONWARD 2 dE E8_— e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8 �Lti e.5 2$ 02 UOo & of�,$ .6 ¢cgnwn o.8 $'c iA uO�Eo °z GR 748 21.7 21.7 Shamola,h F7axlnua uhdW 55130 5W45 49%poor mw.® E X ontlitbn. 749 16.0 16.0 Shamola,h Fraxlnua uhdW mo 3WO 30%poor poor E X X 750 17.3 17.3 Shamola,h Fraxlnua uhdW ms 40140 0%poor poor E X 751 15.8 15.8 Shamola,h Fraxlnua uhdW 55125 2M5 25%very poor E E X Circling roots. poor 752 18.5 18.5 Shamola,h Fraxlnua uhdW 55130 SW45 %%fair .o rato E E 8 X 753 19.8 19.8 Shamol ash Fraxlnua uhdW mo SW45 48%poor poor E E X 754 21.8 21.8 Shamel ash Fraxlnua uhdW 6S125 SS140 45%pow moderate E E X GR X 755 20.1 20.1 Shamel ash Fraxlnua uhdW 55125 60150 55%fair .o nft E X 756 18.1 18.1 Shamel ash Fraxlnua uhdW 60/30 SW45 48%poor poorb motl E E GR 6 X 757 16.8 16.8 Shamel ash Fraxlnua uhdW 60/25 40140 40%poor poor 8 X 758 X 19.3 19.3 Shamel ash Fraxlnua uhdW SSr30 2=5 25%very very poor E E X poor 759 18.2 18.2 Shamel ash Fraxlnua uhdW 60/30 35/35 35%poor poor E E X 760 20.8 20.8 Shamel ash Fraxlnua uhdW Ows 40/30 35%poor poor E E X 59 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C oc _ t $ :: E E'c F Scientific Name L S - q+ v m e e y WLCA Note,from Uptlatetl Overall Condition E& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n t'71 - Ratings S NOTES 1111 N 444p44 =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) u b mow c - c 0 c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 dE E8_— e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8,z �Lti e.a 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ .6 ¢ngnwn Ea $'c iA uO�Eo °z 161 15.4 15A Shamelash Fraxlnua uhdW 50/30 60/35 40%poor mW.® E E 8 X 762 17.1 17.1 Shamelash Fraxlnua uhdW Seas MS 35%pow GR X 763 X 23.5 23.5 Shamelash Fraxlnua uhdW 65/35 i5115 15%very very poor E 9 X poor 766 X 13.6 13.6 Shamelash Fraxlnua uhdW 50/20 10/10 10%very very poor E X poor 765 16.0 16.0 Shamelash Fraxlnua uhdW 50/25 30/30 30%poor poor E E X 766 18.5 18.5 Shamelash Fraxlnua uhdW 50/30 40/40 40%poor poor E E GR X 767 18.8 18.8 Shamelash Fraxlnua uhdW 60/30 35/45 40%poor poor E E X 768 X 14.5 14.5 Sham,l ash Fraxlnua uhdW SSr30 20/20 20%very Roots damaged on poor very poor E E X grade. 769 23.8 23.8 Shamelash Fraxlnua uhdW 65/35 55/35 40%pow moderae E E girdling 15 X root 770 16.3 16.3 Shamelash Fraxlnua uhdW 55/25 30/30 30%poor poor E 10 X 771 X 16.1 16.1 Shamelash Fraxlnua uhdW 55/30 60145 55%fair .o nft E X 772 33.6 33.6 oast red-d Sequoias—Pervlmns 75/20 7M0 70%good moderate X 757.overall condition"gootl". 773 16.4 16.9 oast red-d Sequoias—Pervlmns 60/13 60/60 60%fair moderate X 50%overa11 condition" e' 60 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C oc _ t $ :: a E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 e- q+ v m e e y WLCA Note,from Uptlatetl Overall Condi[lon x Ee& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ tin_ c - n `o ' n t'71 - Ratings S NOTES 1111 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) u b mow c - c a c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 :a SEe3 go as iae 8,z �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ .6 ¢cgnwn Ea $'c aS uO�Eo °z 774 18.5 18.5 oactr -d Segtrola s—Pervlrens 60/15 75160 67%fair moderate X 60%overall...dition"fail' 775 10.7 10.7 oactr -d Segtrola semPw mns 3016 60150 55%fair moderate X 05%overall contlition"poor" 776 34.2 34.2 oactr -d Swltrola semPw mns 7S/25 7M0 70%good moderate X 75%overall contlition"gootl". 777 X 7.8 7.8 oaetrWwootl Sptrola sampeMmns 25I6 SSI35 40%pow moderate W W X 20%overa11 contlltlon"very poor" 778 28.8 28.8 oactr -d Swltrola s—Pe mns 7S/25 7M0 70%good moderate X 7576overal1 contlition"gootl". 779 16.8 16.8 oact rW-d Segtrola semPw mns W13 65155 60%fair moderate X 7576overal1 contlition"gootl". 780 X 7.0 7.0 oaetrWwootl Segtrola sempervlmns 95I6 SSI35 45%pow moderate X 28%overall contlltlon"very poor" 781 21.6 21.6 oact rW-d Segtrola semPw mns 6S115 60140 47%pow moderate 15 X 30%averall contlition"pool'. 782 32.1 32.1 oact rW-d Segtrola semPw mns 3S/20 70f70 70%good moderate X 75%overa11 condNon 783 26.0 26.0 oactr -d Swltrola s—Pe mns 85/20 7M0 70%good moderate X 70%averall contlition"good. 7" 16.1 16.1 oactr -d Swltrola s—Pe mns 75/15 70/65 70%gootl moderate X 50%overall...dition'We' 785 21.8 21.8 oact red-d Segtrola semPw mns 7S115 7M0 70%gootl moderate X 66%overa11 contlition'fail' 786 X 11.0 11.0 Deaf redwood Segtrola sempervlmns 50/8 SOY45 0%poor poor W X 25%overall contlltlon"very poor". 61 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C oc _ t $ :: u E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 e- q+ v m e p.y WLCA Notes from Ipdated Overall CondIIIon Ea& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ tin_ c - n `o ' n t'71 - a Ratings S NOTES 1111 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,species) e ¢ m u b mow c - c c c E u Spring 2015 Survey >3E� a x x x i x x mi0 n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 :a SEe3 go as iae 8ez �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo ¢cgnwn n8 Wax F, t E'E z 787 X 17.8 17.8 oaetrWwootl Segrrola sempervlmns 65I10 60/35 40%poor poor W X 25%overa11 contlltlon"very poor". 788 20.1 20.1 oastr -d Segrrola s—Pervlmns 90/15 60160 60%fair poor motl X SO%overall contlition'fai!' 789 23.4 23.0 oastr -d Swlrrola s—Pervlmns awls 7S/'r0 73%good motlarate E X 70%overa11 contlition"gootl. 790 19.5 19.5 oastr -d SwlrrolasemPS mns awls 7W5 75%gootl motlarate X 60%overall condition"fair' 791 17.1 15.1 32.2 oast redwood Swlrrola s—Pervlmns 70/20 70/60 65%fair 2 X 65%overall contlition"fair'. 792 28.2 28.2 oast red-d Segrrola s—Pervlmns 90/20 7M0 70%gootl motlarate X 70%overall contlition"gootl. 793 21.9 21.8 oast red-d Segrrola s—Pervlmns 70/15 65/60 62%fair modsrate X 56%overall condition'Yair". 784 X 22.0 22.0 oaetrWwootl Sprrola sampsMmns 50/15 60/40 47%pow moMrate 0to2 X Apiul stem aplXout 27%overa11 contlltlon"very poor". 795 24.0 24.0 oast rW-d Swlrrola s—PS mns 8S/20 70fr0 70%good .o rate X 70%overall contlition"gootl. 796 t5.5 tS.5 oast red-d Segrrola s—Pervlmns 90/30 7WS 75%gootl good X 78%overall contlition"gootl". 797 14.8 14.8 oast red-d Segrrola s—Pervlmns m SW40 47%pow .o rate X Supressetl in shade 11%overall contlition"poop. 788 12.6 12.6 Deaf redwood Segrrola sempervlmns 60/12 60/40 48%poor poor E 20 X 25%overall contlltlon"very poor". 799 22.6 22.6 oast red-d Swlrrola s—PS mns 80/13 7M0 70%gootl modsrate X 65%overall condition'Uir. 62 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C IT _ t $ :: a E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 e- q+ v m e p.y WLCA Notes from Ipdated Overall CondIIIan x Ea& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ tin_ c - n `o ' n i'71 a Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) a: m u b mow c - c c c E u Spring 2015 Survey >3E� a x x x i x x mit5 n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 dE E8_— eM 2 2 2 2 2 2 :a SEe3 go as iae 8ez �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo of a%&Xua Ea $'c a4 uO�Eo °z goo 21.8 21.8 oactr -d Saquola s—PaM... 6S/13 65165 65%fair mo4arat0 X 65%overall contlition'Yair'. 801 17.3 17.1 oactr -d Saquola s—PaMmns SS/8 SOMO %%fair poor W W X 30%overall contlition"poor. 802 32.5 32.5 oactr -d Saquola s—PaMmns 90/25 SOMO 50%fair poor X Dlfticult to assess 5g%overall contlilion'fai!' ..ally. 803 15.0 15.0 oactr -d Sarluola s—PaMmns 60/8 30/30 30%poor poor X 30%overall contlition"poor. 20%overall contlltlon"very poor".Thls tree was Illegally pruned In April 2020 or May 2020 by neighbor to west of 804 X 32.4 32.0 oact r -d Saquola s—PaMmns 90/18 60160 60%fair poor.motl X West perlmeter Road,who apparently cut out a large umber of deatl Iimbs extending Into their properly airspace(see ph—In May 16, 20201nspeotion report). 805 13.0 13.0 oactr -d Saquola s—PaMmns SONS 40140 40%poor poor X S-tmnkform 30%overall contlition"poor. 806 16.8 16.8 oact redwood Saquo/a s—PaMmns 50/10 60155 56%fair modara. X 40%overall condiumn'poor" 807 X 12.1 12.1 oaetrWwootl Spools sampeMmns 60/12 50/S5 SSX fair poor.motl X Tree removetl.October 2018. 808 X 24.5 oast—ad Sequoia sempervlrens 90/20 40/30 33%poor poor SS X Tree removetl.October 2018. 809 X 11.0 11.0 oact redwood Saquola sempwvimns SS1Is 60/50 55%fair poor.motl X 37%overall—dition)poor) "a X 15.0 15.0 oact redwood Saquola s—PaMmns 7S/8 10/10 10%vary very poor X g%)Deatl) poor 811 X 5.6 5.6 oaetrWwootl Spuola sempwvlmns 90/6 40Y30 95%poor poor X 25%overall contlltlon"very poor". 812 X 23.2 23.2 oact redwood Saquola s—PaMmns 80/20 0/0 0%tleatl dead X 3-trunk form. 0%)Dead) 63 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`a Eg oB S �q adao a _ C oc _ t 8 :: a E E'c F Scientific Name L X o= i 9 e- q+ v m e p.y WLCA Notes from Ip date Overall CondIIIan x E& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n i'm g - Ratings&NOTES 201] N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPaciea) a' ar m u E u Spring 2015 Survey >3E� a x x x i x x mit5 a m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 dE E8_- e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 :a SEe3 go IS as iae 8a �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo a%&X as n8 $Sa4 uO�Eo °z 813 X 13.3 13.3 oact r -d Saquola s—Pand... 7WI6 10/10 10%very very poor X ]%overall condition(very poor) poor 814 t X 724-4 24.0 oast-a! Saquola sempervlrens 85/20 0/0 0%dear) daad X Tree removetl.October 2018. 815 X 8.0 9.0 oast-a! Saquola sempamim s 40/5 0/0 0%laad tlaad X Tree removetl.October 2018. 816 X 16.5 16.5 oastr -d Sarluola s—Pandmns SW12 50/50 50%fair poor X 20%overall contlltlon"very poor". 81] X 11.8 11.8 oaetrWwootl Spools sempervlrens 95I6 50/90 4JX poor poor X 15%overall contlition'-, poor". 818 25.4 25.9 oast rad-d Sarluola s—Pandmns awls 60160 60%fair motlara X 601.overall condition fail' 819 12.4 12.9 oast rW d Saq—sampaWrens -13 -40 4S%poor poor X 301.overall contlition"pool'. 820 26.3 26.1 oast rod-d Saquo/a sAava 1... 90/25 SS/60 58%fair poor.motl X ]0%overall contlition"gootl. 12%overall contlition"very 821 X Deaf retlwaotl Sequoia sempervlrens 30/3 0/0 pool'.TREE REMOVED AS OF O.-.ER 2018. 822 23.4 23.9 oast rod-d Saquola sempervlrens 90/20 50/50 50%fair poor 18 X 55%overall contlition"fair' 823 17.9 17.8 oast rod-d Saquola s—Pandmns 100115 Boos 40%poor poor 70 X 40%overall contlition"poor" 824 29.3 29.1 oast rod-d Saquola s—Pandmns 100120 40140 40%poor poor.motl 25 X 757 overall contlition-9—d". 825 X 7.8 7.8 oast rod-d Saquola s—Pandmns 3W8 40/20 29%very 18%ovxall contlltlon"very poor poor X poor" 64 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C o c _ t $ :: u E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 e- q+ v m e e y WLCA Note,from Uptlatetl Overall Condi[lon Es& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ tin_ c - n `o ' n t'71 - Ratings S NOTES 1111 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) u b mow c - c a c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 dE E8_— e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8,z �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ .6 ¢cgnwn Ea $'c iA uO�Eo °z 826 11.1 11.1 oactr -d Swluola s—PeMmns M2 60150 SOX fair poor to motl E X Bow form Wnk. 40%overall...dition'pool' 827 X 10.7 10.7 oactr -d Swluola s—Pe mns 35/10 0/0 0%d d d,ad X Bow form Wnk. 0%ID—d) 828 11.7 11.7 oactr -d Swluola semPw mns 50/8 30/30 30%poor poor 20 X 30%avera11 contlition"pool'. 829 27.2 27.2 oactr -d Swluola s—Pe mns 9S/25 7WO 70%good moderato X 70%overall contlition"gootl. 830 15.2 15.2 oactr -d Swluola samPw mns W16 45aO 37%poor poorb motl 20 X 35%averall contlition"pool'. 831 11.0 11.0 oactr -d SeOuola semPw mns 40/8 30/40 37%poor poor SW X 30%averall contlition"pool'. 832 13.0 13.0 oact re -d SeOuola semPw mns 4S/11 60155 58%fair mod,rat0 X 30%averall contlition"pool'. 833 26.6 26.6 oact re -d SeOuola semPw mns 7WO 70/65 68%fair mod,rat0 30 X 78%averall contlition"gootl". au X 5.8 5.8 oactr -d SeOuola semPw mns 3015 20/2g 20%very 6%overall c.nd'tl.n"very poor very Poor SE X Pool'. 835 15.8 11.0 26.8 oact re -d Swluola s—Pe mna 85/18 60150 55%fair poorb motl 2 X 45%overall contlition"pool'. VX8.8 oas[retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 30/12 25/25 35�orry vary poor 3 Tree removetl.October 2016. 837 15.2 15.2 oact re -d Swluola s—Pe mna 45/10 SW40 4SX poor poor to motl W NW X 30%averall contlition"pool'. 838 23.8 23.8 oact re -d Swluola s—Pe mna 85/20 45145 4S%poor poor X 60%overall...dition'fail' 66 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C oc _ t $ :: a E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 e- q+ v m e e y WLCA Note,from Uptlatetl Overall Condi[lon x Ev& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ tin_ c - n `o ' n t'71 - Ratings S NOTES 2011 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) u b mow c - c a c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 dE E8_- e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 :a SEe3 go as iae 8,z �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ .6 ¢cgnwn Ea $'c a4 uO�Eo °z 839 26.1 26.1 oactr -d S"-I.s-Pervlrens 80/25 60160 60%fair moderate X 70%avera11 cantlition"gootl. 890 X 10.8 8.0 18.8 oaetrWwootl Segtrola sempervlrens 60/8 9SI35 95%poor poor 20 X 20%overa11 contlltlon"very poor". Sweep form imnk. 891 21.2 21.2 oaetrWwootl Sptrola sampervlren 80/13 60/50 Sl%fair poor motl X Apical meri,tem 95%overa11 contlition"poop. appearm gone. 842 27.2 8.5 35.7 oactr -d Swltrola sampervlrens 80/15 7M0 70%9oad moderate X 75%overall conditian'g,ad". 843 X 10.8 10.8 oaet r -d SeOuola sempervlrens 5319 10/10 10%very Tree has been removetl. poor very Poor is X October 2018. 899 16.4 16.9 oactr -d S"-I.semPw mns 80/20 60/90 50%fair poorb motl X 757 overall contlition"gootl". 845 28.2 28.2 oact re -d Swltrola s-Pervlmna 80/25 7M0 70%good moderate X 30%averall contlition"pool'. 896 X 19.7 19.7 Deaf redwood Segtrola sempervlrens 45I6 50/95 48X poor poor b motl X 25%overall contlltlon"very poor". 847 11.5 9.5 21.0 oactr -d Swltrola s-Pervlmna 9S/10 swso 50%fair poorb motl X 35%overall contlition"pool'. 848 23.9 23.8 oact re -d S"-I.semPw mns 80/20 swso 50%fair poorb motl X 35%averall cantlition"poor. 849 20.5 20.5 oact re -d Swltrola s-Pervlmna 80/18 60150 55%fair poorb motl X 55%overa11 contlition"fail' 850 18.3 18.1 oact re -d Swltrola s-Pervlmna 80115 55150 59%fair poorb motl E X 55%overa11 contlition"fail' 851 24.5 24.5 oact re -d Swlrrola s-Pervlmna 85/25 65150 60%fair mod,ra X Sweepfor-nk. 30%averallcandition"pool'. 66 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 updated overan condition a E y c S c e + Scienti5c Name U $ e o._ o f i c on m ca v m' c n WLCA Noted from Ratings&NOTES 2017 Common Name yy m.. g ac E u g 8 ._ Spring 2015 Survey ONWARD o q—`a (Genus,species) g e' n i u d O1 S W w W B d lu E m 'c f = ga Sod aE in aS 2 2 2 2 2 2 20%overall condNbn"very 852 X 12.5 6.8 18.0 oaetrWwootl Spools samparvinns 58/18 60/50 50%fair Poor to motl 1 X Poor 1S%overall n,ndition'Yery 15 853 X 11.8 7.8 18.6 coast rW d Spuola sampaMrans 35/18 15/15 Ro�ry very Poor 2 X Poor' 15%overall wndlSon'Yery BS4 X 18.5 18.5 oaet rW d Spools sampeMmns 10/18 40/35 38%pow poor 90 X Poor". 25%overall condition"vary 855 X 15.1 15.1 oast rW d SKw1a samwwmns 10/18 55/50 53%fair poor to motl X Poor'' 25%ovem11 condltlon'1rery 886 X 10.1 10.1 oast rW d Spuola sampervbens 45M 40/35 40%poor poor X Poor. X 50%overall condition Yair' SST 21.1 21.1 oact rMwood Sequoias—io-nnens 8S/25 55/50 50%fair poor to motl X 55%o—n.condition Ime, ass 185 19.5 oact rWwood Spools sampeMrens 85/20 60/50 55%fair motlwrte X Supresaetl in ehetle 4S%overall contlition"poor. 859 9.8 9.8 oastrMwootl Spuola sampaWrens 50/10 40/35 98X pow poor X 55%overa11-ndmon Yair' 860 22.2 22.2 oast retlwood Sequoias—P.M—s 85/20 60160 60%fair motlereb X 65%overall condition"fair. 861 25.0 25.0 oast retlwood Spool,s—P.Mmns 90/30 60/60 60%fair motlorefe X TO%overall condition"gootl. 862 20.6 20.6 oast retl d Sequoia sempeMrens 80P25 60180 60%fair moMrate X 78 overall condition'good". 863 31.5 31.5 oaetr ood Sarluola samP-W—s 90/20 78/75 78%gootl Sow X 50%overall contlition"fair' 864 238 238 ast redwootl Sequoia semperv0ens 95I15 T01fi5 fib%fair motlarate 67 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 updated overan condition a E y c r3 c e + 6cienti6c Name U $ e n._ o f = m c m .m c n WLCA Noted from Ratings S NOTES 2017 o E v E E r V µ°'' u Common Name yy c u c — c O.. g 'c E u g Spring 2015 Survey ONWARD o q—`e (Genus,species) g e' d m a W w W ;, °sygF Y m mgga q - R slit= egg ;c'8 aL _ 02 "n - cz c$ o� = ga Sod ESQ of aE §¢'rco°wn aS 2 2 2 2 2 2 S4mnk form. ~ ~ X Abnormal trunk 50%overall contlition"Fair' 24.0 oaetrWwootl Sequoia semperv/rens MIS 60/40 47%poor mo4ina W roes section thM is 865 24.0 cankeretl. 866 31.0 13.3 44.3 coastr ood Sequoia samparvlrerls 95/28 60/50 55%fair motivate W 3 X q5%overall contlition"poop. X Supresaed in shad. 26%ovarsll conMUon'Yery 6.g oaet rW d Sequole sempommns 30/6 65/45 55%fair mo4ina Per' 867 X 6.5 X 60%overa11-nation Yair' 868 16.3 16.1 oaet rW d Sequoia--wwmns 50/18 70IT0 70%good mo4lin t X 40"h Pverag contlition"poor" 86y 160 16.0 oast rW d Sequole sempeMrens 15/15 70/60 68%fair ni Mnft X 70%overall contlition"good. 8T0 27.6 27.6 oastr ood Sequole semperv/rens 85/20 TWO 75%good good X 70%_.it-rdition"good. 871 25.8 25.8 oaetr ood Sequoia sempervlrens 95/25 7Sf]5 75%good good 872 23.7 15.6 98.1 oaetr ood Sequoias—P.M—s 50/20 65/55 60%fair motlmate E 2 873 X 13.8 11.8 ode[real Sequola sempervlrens 65/12 25125 35%oery poor 874 105 10.5 ...[real Sequola sempommns 30/9 35/30 30%poor poor 875 14.1 14.1 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervirans 4SNp 40140 40%poor Poor AIL Lot (START OF 91.0 coaetrWwootl Spuola sampeMrens "WIN" WEST. MIS 70%good mods 876 'ALTERNATE LOT 31.0 WEST.'ALTERNATE X 877 AR Lot 29T 23T ast and ood Sequoia sempervlrens 65/18 65160 63%bir poor to motl "West" 68 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C IT _ t $ :: E E'c F Scientific Name L E - q+ v m e p.y WLCA Notes from Updated Overall Condition E°& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n t m g - Ratings S NOTES 1111 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $° (Genoa,aPeciea) a: ¢ m u b mow c - c ° c E u Spring 2015 Survey >3E� n x x x i x x mit5 n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8ez �Lti e.a 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ �'° 818 All.L. 19.2 19.2 oact r -d Sequoia s—Pervlmns 7S/15 65160 63%fair poor b mod X "West" 878 AIL Lot 22.8 22.8 oact r -d Sequoia s—Pwvlmns 7S/18 65/65 6S%fair .o rate X West" 880 Alt.Lot 20.5 20.5 oact r -d Swluola s—PwvImns 7S/18 65/55 60%fair .o rate X "West" 88t AIL Lot 20.8 11.9 32.7 oactr -d Swluolasemp—Imna 75/18 60150 %%fair .o rate 3 X West" 882 AIL Lot 33.3 33.1 oact rW-d Swluola s—PwvImns 6S/20 60/60 60%fair .o rate X West" 883 AIL Lot 11.4 11.9 oact rW-d Sequoia s—PwvImns 3W 3WS 33%poor poor X West" 884 AIL L,,[ 315 31.5 oact rW-d Sequoias—PwvImns 8W18 60/60 60%fair poorb mod W X West" 885 AIL L,,[ 32.1 32.1 oact rW-d Sequoia s—PwvImns 8S/25 7WS 75%eootl motlarate X West" 886 AIL Lot 9.8 9.8 oact rW-d Sequoia s—PwvImns 4516 30/30 30%poor poor X West" 881 AIL L,,[ 25.5 25.5 oact rW-d Sequoia s—PwvImns 7S/18 6S/65 65%fair poor b mod X West" 888 AIL L,,[ 29.0 29.0 oact redwood Swluola s—P-1mna 8=5 60155 58%fair poorb mod X West" 888 Alt.Lot 1 15.3 15.l oacd Sequoia s—PwvImns qg/g 2gM5 25%very "West" t redwood poor X poor 890 Alt.L. X 16.9 16.8 oact redwood Sequoias—PwvImns SW12 0/0 0%tlead X "West" 69 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB 'E _ C If _ t $ :: E 'c F Scientific Name L 9 - q+ v me p.y WLCA Notes from I oatea Overall Condition E°& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ tin_ c - 1 `o ' n i'71 Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $° (Genoa,aPeciea) e ¢ m u b mow c - c ° c E u Spring 2015 Survey >3E� n x x x i x x mit5 n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O o ONWARD 2 dEE8_- e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8a �Lti 1Q 2$ 02 UOo ¢141w° Ea $'c iA uO�Eo °z ag1 Alt.Lot X 28.5 29.5 oact r -d Sequoia s—Pervlrens 65/25 0/0 0%dead X "West" 882 AIL Lot X 8.6 8.6 oact r -d Sequoia s—PwvImns 3016 0/0 0%dead X "West" 883 AIL Lot 26.4 26.0 oact r -d Swluola s—PwvImns 75/20 7M0 70%good modaraw X West" Sobyspherla fungal Imeation n°wa a: Se4 Alt.Lot 18.3 18.1 oactr -d Swluola s—PwvImns 65112 40ao 35%pow modaraw X alongtrunk.Monlltor progression over time. 885 AIL Lot 28.4 28.4 Italian awns pine Plnus plow 45ao 85175 78%good good E E West" 886 AIL Lot 26.2 26.2 Ialian awns pine Plnus plow 45/25 80/30 50%fair good E E 18 West" 887 AIL Lot 9.6 9.6 oact r -d Sequoia s—PwvImns 25112 65/60 64%fair .o raw X West" 888 AIL Lot 17.8 17.8 oactr -d Swluola s—P—Imna 45/15 60/60 60%fair poor w mod X West" 888 AIL Lot 11.4 11.4 oact rW-d Swluola s—P—Imna 45115 60140 50%fair modsraw X Svreep-form trunk. "West" 800 AIL Lot 19.7 19.7 oact rW-d Sequoias—PwvImns 60/i6 35/35 35%poor poor X West" 801 AIL Lot 4.1 4.1 oact rW-d Sequoia s—PwvImns 30/6 35/35 35%poor .o raw X West" 802 AIL Lot 9.5 9.5 oactr -d Swluola s—P—Imna 35/12 65/45 50%fair modsraw X Mainawm aplitout. West" 803 AIL Lot 14.7 14.7 oaet redwood Sequoias—P-1— 45/15 65/65 65%fair modsraw X West" 70 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 updo,d oearan condition a E y c S c e + Scientific Name U $ e n._ o f = m c m m n' v _ ;.E n WLCA Noted from Ratings&NOTES 2017 o E v E is r? V µ°'' u Common Name yy 4 8 ONWARD ._ Spring 2015 Survey SHEo q—`n (Genus,species) g e' n i u d m a W w W B d w E m f R slit= "n - 3as o� = ga Sod ESQ aE §¢'rco°wn aS 2 2 2 2 2 2 X g04 Alt Lot 129 12.8 ...tredwootl Sequoia semperv/rens 65115 70f70 70%good ono inr "West" X 905 Al,Lot 11, 14.T coast rW d Spools samparvlrans SS/20 6sno 68%hir modvate "West" X 906 Alt.Lot 19.3 19.1 ...t rW d spool.sempommns 10/20 70f70 70%good ono inr "West" X 807 Alt.Lot 160 16.0 oast redwood Spuola s—P.Wmns 60/12 60/45 50%hir poor E "West" X goo Alt Lot 64 6.4 oast rWwood segool.s—Pww ens 25/10 70/40 50%hir moderate E "WasC X W1g Alt.Lot 270 27.0 ....tr ood Sequole sampervbens 75/20 Wool 50%hir poor "WasC X 910 Alt.Lot 22.9 22.8 ...t redwood spool.setup-m—s 75/18 65/65 65%hir poor to motl "West" X 911 Alt.Lot 20.4 20.9 ....tr ood spool.sempervlrees 75/20 70f70 70%good ni Mnte "N.V X S-form flunk. 912 Alt Lot 255 25.5 ....tr ood spool.sampeMrens 75/18 60150 55%Nor poor W motl "West" X 913 Alt.Lot 202 20.2 ...t redwood Spuola sa P.Wmn. 7118 70/70 70%good moderate "West" X 914 Alt.Lot 23.5 23.5 ....tr ood spool.sempwvlrens 701,18 s0160 54%hir Poor "Wort" X 915 Alt Lot 108 14.8 ....tr ood Saquola semparvbens 75/16 55/55 55%hir poor "West" X 916 AN,Lot 16.2 10.0 26.2 coast radwaatl Spuola senonnvfens SSN6 TWO 70%good motlarate "West" 71 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C oc _ t 8 :: E E'c F Scientific Name L X o= i 8 - q+ v m e p.y WLCA Notes from Ipdated Overall CondIIIon E°& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n i'71 Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $° (Genoa,aPeciea) a: ¢ m u b mow c - c ° c E u Spring 2015 Survey >3E� n x x x i x x mit5 n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O o fr ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae t3 ez �Lti e.a 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ �'° ¢rv4nw° a8 $'c.A uO�Eo °z 817 AIL Lot 14.5 14.5 oact r -d Swluola s—PeMmns 45/10 40140 40%poor poor X "Waal" 818 AIL Lot 28.8 28.8 oact r -d Swluola s—P—Imns 80/15 40140 40%poor poor X W°st" 919 Alt.Lot X 17.2 17.2 oact r -d Swluola s—PwvImns SN4 0/0 0%tl d X "West" 820 AIL Lot 24.4 24.9 oactr -d Swluola s—P—Imna 8W12 7W70 70%gootl motlaraw N X West" 82t AIL Lot 21.5 21.5 Italian awns pine Plnus plow 4S/20 85145 55%fair flood E E West" 822 AIL Lot 17.8 17.8 Ialian awns pine Plnus plow 4S/18 7WS 40%pow flood E E West" 923 Alt.Lot X 12.2 9.1 21.1 oact rW-d Sequoias—PwvImns SN4 0/0 0%tl d X "West" 824 AIL L. 12.1 12.1 oact rW-d Sequoias—PwvImns 7W10 60150 55%fair motlsraw N X West" 825 AIL Lo[ 20.8 20.8 oact rW-d Sequoia s—PwvImns 65114 65/65 65%fair motlsraw X West" 826 AIL Lo[ 7.5 7.5 oact rW-d Sequoia s—PwvImns 3516 60140 %%fair motlsraw S X West" 827 AIL Lo[ 11.2 11.2 oac t rW-d Sequoia s—PwvImns 4SI8 SW40 47%„West" poor poorw motl 3 X 828 AIL Lo[ 18.7 18.7 oact rW-d Sequoias—PwvImns 6W10 70/65 68%fair motleraw S X West" 828 Alt'L. 25.4 25.9 oact red-d Sequoia s—PwvImns 75/20 7W70 70%flood .o raw X "West" 72 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 updated oeeran condition a E y c r5 c e + Scientific Name U $ e n._ o f = m c m m n' v _ ;.E n WLCA Noted from Ratings&NOTES 2017 o E v E is r V µ°'' u Common Name yy 4 8 ONWARD ._ Spring 2015 Survey SHEo q—`e (Genus.species) g e' n i u d m a W w W B d w E m f ;, °sygF Y m mgga q - R slit= egg ;c'8 aL _ 02 "n - 5as $ o� = ga Sod ESQ aE §¢'rco°wn aS 2 2 2 2 2 2 X 930 AIL Lot 19.9 19.8 ....t radwootl Sequoia sempervirens 75118 70f70 70%good mWinete E "West" X 931 Alt.Lot 152 142 coast redwood Spools sampervlrens 65/18 60/60 11%fair poor.m,d E "West" X 932 Alt.Lot X 14.2 14.2 ...t rsde,00d segwla sempommn SS/8 5/5 5%vary poor very poor "West" X 833 Alt Lot X 9.5 815 oast radon od sequoia sempervlmns 30/5 0/0 0%dead "West" X 9M Alt.Lot 23.5 23.5 Monterey pine Plnus mdIele 5=5 60/45 SOX fair motlerate SW sW "WaeC AIL Lot i1.2 13.2 oast rode ood Segoola sempervlmns 4W 5/5 5%vary poor very poor E X 834 gyast" X X 936 Alt.Lot 29.2 29.2 ...t rsderuad spools sempervbens 70/20 70f70 70%good mWinate "West" X 937 Alt Lot X 60 6.0 ...t rsderuad spools sempendoens 30/5 0/0 0%deed "N.r Alt.Lot 15.3 iS.l o..t rsderuad spool.setup-m—s 60/10 2.12. 20%-po.- very poor X 838 gyest" X X 938 Alt Lot y3 4.3 Shamel ash Fr.Xlnus uh" 25M 8S/85 85%gow g.w "WesC X 940 Alt.Lot 20.1 20.1 oast rede-d spool.s—PeMre-s 65N2 40150 45X poor Pow "WasC X 941 Alt.Lot 20.0 20.0 ...t redwood spool.sempendoens 75/15 70f70 70%good modmate "West" X 892 AN.Lot X 50 5.0 coast redwastl Spuola semperv0ens 65113 010 0%deed "West" 73 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C If _ t $ :: E E'c F Scientific Name L S - q+ v m e e y WLCA Notes from Uptlatetl Overall Condition E°& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - o. `o ' n i'71 - Ratings S NOTES 1111 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $° (Genoa,aPeciea) e ¢ m u b mow c - c ° c E u Spring 2015 Survey >3E� n x x x i x x mi0 n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O o ONWARD 2 dE E8_- e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae r3a �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo 843 All.L. 22.6 22.6 oact r -d Sequoia s—Pervlmns 6S/15 60150 55%fair poor b motl X "West" 844 Alt'L°r 17.1 17.1 oactr -d Sequoias—Pwvlmns 60/13 TWO 70%good moderate X West" 845 Alt.Lot 18.4 18.0 oactr -d Sequoias—PwvImns 6S/15 70/65 68%fair .o raw X Sweep-form trunk. "West" 846 AIL Lot 17.0 17.0 oactr -d Spools samlwrvlmns 6S/12 30/30 30%poor poor X West" 847 AIL Lot 7.8 7.8 oact r -d Swluola s—PwvImns 3015 SWO 30%poor poor X West" 848 AIL Lot 23.0 23.0 Monbrey pine PI.-xdk,. 1S/2 0/0 0%deatl X "West" (STUMP) 848 Alt.Lot X 12.2 12.2 oact r -d Sequoia s—PwvImns SWS 0/0 0%d d X "West" 850 AIL L,,[ 16.6 16.6 oactr -d Sequoias—PwvImns 6W18 7WS 75%good moderate X West" 851 AIL L,,[ 24.5 24.5 IWlien awns pine Plnus Plnw 1S/2 0/0 0%deatl X West" 852 AIL L,,[ 18.5 18.5 IWlien awns pine Plnus Plrrw 30/20 60/30 40%pow good E E Severe lean. West" 853 AIL L,,[ 22.7 22.7 oactr -d Swluola s—P-1mna SW15 SW45 47%poor poor w motl X West" 9, Alt'L. X 8.7 8.7 oact r -d Sequoia s—PwvImns 2515 S/5 5%vary poor very poor X "West" 855 Alt.Lot 7 17.7 17.] oae d Spuola samp—l— 40/18 2SMS 25%very „West" t red very poor X poor 74 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 updated oewan condition .m c n WLCA Noted from Ratings&NOTES 2017 o E v E is r V µ°'' u Common Name yy 4 8 ONWARD ._ Spring 2015 Survey SHEo q—`e (Genus,species) g e' r6 i u d m a W w W B d w E m f ;, °sygF Y m mgga q - R slit= "n - 5as $ o� = ga Sod ESQ aE §¢'rco°wn aS 2 2 2 2 2 2 X 956 AIL Lot 25.9 25.8 ...t wootl Spools sampeMnns 65/20 50/50 SOX fair paorb motl "West" 957 Alt.Lot 14.0 13.3 27.6 coast rW d Spools samperWrens 55/13 90Y30 90%pow poor 2 X "West" X 958 Alt.Lot 7 6.4 6.,t oaet rWwood Sequoia sempommns 40/4 5/5 5%vary Poor very poor "West" X SM Alt Lot 214 21.9 oact r ood Sequoia sempwwmns 65/18 45/45 45%pow poor "West" 960 Alt.Lot 5.5 5.5 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhM 25/10 85/60 65%fair good 8 8 X "WaeC X Win Alt Lot 215 21.5 oactr ood Spuola sempervlmns 60/18 30/30 30%pow "West" X 962 Alt.Lot 14.3 14.3 oaetrWwootl Spools sampeMrens 9S/14 90Y30 90X pow "West" AIL Lot 0.0 0.0 DalNornla pepper Sohlnus maim 1717 7W5 75%good gootl 963 ree 9N.V X Alt.Lot 17 9 17.8 oast r ood Spools sempwvlmns 40/6 0/0 0%deatl 864 gyest" X X 965 Alt.Lot 16.5 16.5 oact rW d Spools sempwvlmns 55/15 30/30 30%pow "WesC 35 X 866 AIL Lot 7 18.8 18.8 oaot redwood Spool-sampervinns W5 25125 pporry Pow "WasC X 967 Alt.Lot 6.8 3.7 10.5 Shamel ash Frazlnus ufal 35/14 Will 75%good gootl "West" X 968 AN.Lot 7 15.1 15.1 asi redwootl Spuola so.pervkens 3514 0/0 0%tleatl "West" 75 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`m Eg oB S _ C oc _ t $ :: m E E'c F Scientific Name L X o= i 9 m- q+ v m e p.y WLCA Notes from Iptlatetl Overall CondIIIon E°& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n i'm g - Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $m (Genoa,aPeciea) a: ¢ m u b mow c - c m c E u Spring 2015 Survey >3E� m x x x i x x mit5 m m �a 22m ae qEEaYRpFc O E��o ft ._ ONWARD 2 dE E8_— e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as x'a� t3 ez �Lti e.a 2$ 0jIS 2 UOo of�,$ .6 ¢cgnw° n8 Wax uO�Eo A 868 All.Lot 5.6 5.6 Shamelash 17-1 ua OM 35/12 7WS 75%good good X West" 870 AIL Lot 7 8.2 8.2 oact r -d Sequoia s—Pavlmns we S/5 5%vary poor very poor X "West" 871 Alt.Lot 7 7.7 7.] oact r -d Sequoia s—Pavlmns MIS 2g/2g 20%very „West" very poor X poor 872 AILot L 22.2 22.2 oact r -d Swluola s—Pavlmns 6S/20 65165 6S%fair .o ra X W.L. Alt.Lot Aplcal meds.m has 873 „West" 18.5 18.5 oact r -d Sequoia s—PwvImns 6S/20 40140 40%poor poor X been split out. 874 AIL Lot 18.4 18.0 oast retlwood Sequoia sempervlrens 6=0 75/75 75%good moderate X "West" 875 AIL Lot 23.2 23.2 oactr -d Sequoia sempervlrens awls 65165 65%fair .o ra N X "West" 876 AIL Lot 10.6 10.6 oast redwood Sequoia sempervlrens W12 70165 68%hir moderate X West" 877 AIL Lot 10.3 10.1 oast retlwootl Sequoias—PwvImns W12 6S/65 65%hir .o ra X "West" 878 AIL Lot 28.6 28.6 oast mtlwood Sequoia sempervlrens 70/1s 7M0 70%gootl moderate X "West" 878 AIL L. 23.8 23.8 oact r -d Sequoia s—wrvImns 80/18 60/60 60%fair poor.mod X "West" 880 AIL Lot 20.5 20.5 oast retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens MIS 60/60 60%fair poor.mod X "West" 881 AIL Lot 20.8 20.8 oact redwood Sequo1as—P-1mns awls 75/75 75%good .o ra X "West" 76 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 Ea o'p'Y 8 crY ite E — $ c• ~n -'c n Common Name Scientific Name i g$ _ (Gems.,-pads-) - i oa' 8 a € q; m upaatea overan conalnon t; x @@ WLCA Notesfrom `q- o� -9 y d o p W ggc d go m iy'� c �rc :m '- m S Ratings INWARD 2017 2 §a'0rc�neLL a8 2 2 2 2 $c$ uSovE g� m! ae �" �r8 e.@ "@ 8�W aY c�8 gg lEs _'�_' a Kong zwssareey 2 2 S g w 9 ONWARD _s 8 �zo - 2- Ag o2 sf 882 Alt.Let "WasC 20.0 20.0 oast red—d Sequoia sempervlrens 70/15 45/40 Ct% Sow poor x 983 Alt.Lot "West" 162 162 oact retlwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 80/15 60/60 60%h'v poor to motl x 984 At.Lot "West" 23.0 23.6 oastr -d spool-sampervi— 70/18 65/65 65%f-ir .o ra NW X Sweep-(orm trunk. 985 Alt.Lot "WasC 28.8 28.8 oa-t retlwootl Spool-samprvlmns 7W18 45/85 45% pow poor X 986 Alt.Lot "West" 22.0 16.7 38.7 oast retlwootl Spools sampervi—s 70/18 45/45 45% pow poor X 987 Alt.Lot "West" 19.2 19.2 oast retlwootl Spools samprvinns 55/12 60/50 55%f-ir poor b motl X 888 Alt.Lot "West" 26.7 Z6.7 oast retlwptl Smiuolo sampwvlmns 70/15 45/45 45% pow poor X 989 Alt.Lot "West" 102 102 oast retlwptl Smiuolo sampwvlmns 35/12 60/50 55%fair motlera X 990 Alt.Lot 9WSC 27.3 27.3 oa-t retlwootl Speola sampervlrens 8Wi6 60/60 60%f-ir poor b motl X 991 Alt.Lot "West" 25.0 23.0 o--t retlwptl Smiuola samp—tmns 80/17 45/85 45% pow poor X 882 Alt.Lot "West" 29.5 29,5 aoa-e r.awooa saquol•samparWrans 6011e 4v50 46%pow poor to moo x 883 Alt.Lot "West" 20.7 20.7 oaetrWwptl Spuola sampervlrens 75/12 90/30 90%pow poor X 984 Alt.Lot "West" 33.3 33.3 oast retlwptl Spuola sampan-Imes 6W18 45/55 WX ytr ��� X 77 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C If _ t $ :: E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 - q+ v m e e y WLCA Note,from Uptlatetl Overall Condition Ea& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n i'71 a Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $° (Genoa,aPeciea) u b mow c - c , c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYRpFc O o ONWARD 2 dE E8_- e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go IS as iae t3,z �Lti e.a 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ .6 ¢cgnw° n8 $'c iA uO�Eo °z 885 Ait.Lot 16.1 16.1 oaci r -d Suoia s-Pervlrens VN12 35/35 35% "Weal" eq Poor poor X Stunk form. 886 AIL Lot 16.8 16.8 oaci r -d Sequoia s-PwvImns 6S/i6 ISMS 55%fair poor b motl X West" 887 Alt.Lot 17.8 17.8 oaci r -d Sequoia s-PwvImns 6S114 60160 60%fair .o rate 45 X "West" 888 AIL Lot 21.1 21.1 oacir -d Swluola s-wrvImns 6S/15 65165 65%fair .o rate X Stunk form. West" 888 AIL Lot 23.3 23.1 oaci rW-d Swluola s-PwvImns 6S/18 60/60 60%fair poorb motl X West" 1Wo Alt.Lot 12.0 12.0 oacir -d Sequoias-PwvImns 6Wi6 65165 65%fair motlarate X "West" 1W1 Alt.Lot 127 12.7 oacir -d Sequoias-PwvImns SW13 5S/5O 54%fair poorb motl X "West" 1W2 AIL Lot 16.8 16.8 oaci redwood Sequoias-PwvImns 60/15 45/50 48%poor poor X West" 1Ws Alt.Lot 12.4 12.0 11.5 35.8 oaci redwood Sequoias-PwvImns 6S/15 65160 6s%fair motlerate X "West" 1oe4 Alt.Lot 20.7 20.7 oacir -d Sequoias-PwvImns 7Wi6 40140 40%poor poor iS X West" 1W5 Alt'Lot 13.0 13.0 oacir -d Sequoias-PmvImns 35/14 50/45 0%poor moderato X West" 1W6 Alt'Lot 26.7 26.7 oast retlwood Sequoia sempervirens 7WIS 30/30 30%poor poor X "West" 1W7 AIL Lot 16.8 16.8 °astredwood Sequoias-PwvImns 6S/18 30/30 30%poor poor X West" 1008 Alt.Lot 18.8 18.8 oacir -d Sequoia sempervlrens 7W18 60/60 60%fair poorb motl X "West" 1W, Alt.Lot 7 16.6 16.6 oast ,d Sequoia sempervlrens MIS 1W10 10%very X Aploal medstem is "West" retlwo poor very poor gone. 78 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C If _ t $ :: E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 - q+ v m e p.y WLCA Notes from Iptlalod Overall CondIIIon E°& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n i'71 Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) e ¢ m u b mow c - c ° c E u Spring 2015 Survey >3E� n x x x i x x mit5 n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 dE E8_- eM 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8ez �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo 1010 All.Lot 7 t redwood 17.7 17.) oacd Sequo/a sempervirens 6S115 15/15 15%wry „West" very poor X poor Ohaln around trunk Is a Mling if,.tree, 1011 Alt'Lot be must ntl 25%very 7 13.8 13.8 oact r -d Sequo/a sempervirens 6S/15 25/25 verya "West" poor Poor X nd.ASAP In order to avoid the ee Wain 1012 Alt.Lot 21.7 21.7 oact r -d Sequo/a sempervirens MIS 60/60 60%fair poor.mod X "West" 1019 Alt'Lot 26.0 26.0 Deaf redwood Sequo/a sempervirens 7S/18 90Y30 30%poor poor X West" I_ Alt.Lot 7 15.1 is.1 oactr -d Sequoia sempervirens 7W13 2q/2g 20%very „West" very poor X poor 1015 Alt.Lot 7 18.4 18.0 oact r -d Swluola sempervirens 65/14 2M5 25%very „West" very poor X poor Alt.Lot Apical meriatem 1016 „West" 16.6 16.6 oactr -d Swluola s-Pavlrens 70/16 40as 38%pow poor X tlegected oRfrom vertical. 1017 Alt.Lot 7 13.1 13.1 oact r -d Sequoia s-Pavlmns W13 30/20 25%very „West" very poor X poor 1019 AIL Lot 16.9 16.8 oact r -d Swluola s-Pwvlmns W16 3q/2g 25%vary "West" poor X poor 1019 Alt.Lot 26.5 26.5 oast rWwood Sequoia sempwvlrens 75/18 65f75 70%good W. X West" I_ Alt.Lot 7 6.8 6.8 oactr -d Swluola s-Pwvlmns 2014 30/20 25%wry "West" poor X poor 1021 AIL Lot 9.7 9.7 oact r -d Swluola s-Pwvlmns 35/12 75/55 65%fair moderate X "West" 1022 AIL Lot 21.0 21.0 oaetrWwootl Sequoia sempwvlrens SS113 95I40 98%poor poor X West" 1029 AIL Lot 24.9 24.8 oact r -d Swluola s-Pwvlmns 7S/20 SW65 60%fair poor W mod X "West" 1024 AIL Lot 17.7 17.7 oactr -d Swluola sem mftns 6W14 60165 65%fair mW.nft X West" 1025 Alt'Lot 8.8 8.8 oast retlw°°d Sequoia sempervlrens 35/10 60145 0%fair moderate X West" 1026 Alt'Lot 16.5 16.5 oast retlw°°d Sequoia sempervlrens 4W10 60160 60%fair moderate X West" 79 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C If _ t $ :: E E'c F Scientific Name L X o= i 9 - q+ v m e p.y WLCA Notes from Ipdated Overall CondIIIon E°& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c S o n_ c - n `o ' n i'71 Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) u b mow c - c ° c E u Spring 2015 Survey >3E� n x x x i x x mit5 n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 dE E8_- e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae t3 ez �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo ¢0gnw° Ea $'c iA uO�Eo °z 1027 All.Lot 20.6 20.6 oact redwood Sequo/a sempervirens 6S/14 70f70 70%good W. X "West" lose Alt.Lot 18.8 18.8 oact r ood Sequo/a sempervirens 60/14 SW45 SOX fair poor.motl X "West" lose Alt.Lot 7 16.4 16.0 oactr ood Sequoias—PavI... 60/10 2g/2g 20%very "West" poor very poor X Apical a.m is tlentl. 1030 Alt'Lot 7 17.5 17.5 oact r ood Sequoia s_Pwvlmns 6S/10 S/5 5%vary poor very poor X West" I., Alt'Lot 7 21.0 21.0 oact r ood Sequoia sempervirens 6S/10 5/5 5%vary poor very poor X "West" 1032 Alt.Lot 29.7 29.) oac t r ood Swluola sempervirens 70/18 55/40 47%„West" poor poor.motl 40 X 1033 Alt.Lot 18.5 18.5 oactr ood Swluola s_Pwvlmns W13 65/65 65%fair mW.rnte X West" I_ Alt.Lot 24.8 24.8 oactr ood Swluola s—PmvImns 70/15 7M0 70%good mW.rnte X "West" 1035 Alt.Lot 17.0 17.0 oactr ood Swluola s—PmvImns 7S/14 70/35 SOX fair mW.rnte S X West" 1036 Alt.Lot 30A 30A oast rW d Sequo1as—P-1-- 85/25 7W5 75%good good X West" 1037 Alt.Lot 23.3 23.3 oactr ood Swluola s_Pwvlmns BW15 70160 66%fair modern. X "West" 1038 Alt'Lot 22.0 22.0 oact r ood Swluola s_Pwvlmn 70/15 60150 55X fair poor.motl X Mlcal stem missing "West" (blown out). I.. Alt'Lot 25.8 25.8 oact r ood Swluola s_Pwvlmns 30/20 7M0 70%good moderate X West" 10W Alt.Lot 454 45.0 oactr ood Swluola s_Pwvlmns 80/20 70/67 70%good moderate S X "West" 1pN AIL Lot 29.1 29.1 oactr ood Swluola sempervirens 80115 7M0 70%good moderate X West" 10u AIL Lot 175 17.5 oast retlwo°E Sequoia sempervlrens 8W10 70/60 65%fair moderate X "West" 10a9 AIL Lot 36.5 36.5 oast retlwo°E Sequoia sempomim s 85/18 7S/'r0 73%good good X "West" 80 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C If _ t $ :: E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 - q+ v m e P.y WLCA Notes from Ipdated Overall Condition x E°& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n i'm g - Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 444p44 =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) u b mow c - c s c E u Spring 2015 Survey >tg � a x x x i x x mit5 n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O E��o ft ._ ONWARD 2 dE E8_- e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8ez �Lti e.a 2$ 02 UOo of ¢cgnw° 0.8 $'c iA uO�EoA. °z 10u All.Lot ? 11.5 11.5 oast re -d Sequo/a sempervirens VON20/20 20%wry poor„West" very poor X 10a5 AIL Lot 337 33.7 oast r -d Sequo/a sempervirens 80/13 70160 63%fair moderate E X "West" 10W Alt.Lot 278 27.8 oastr -d Sequoia sampervlrens 80112 6siso 57%fair mod.rab E 70 X "West" 10a7 AIL Lot 210 21.0 ..a trWwootl Sequoia sampervlrens 80112 70160 68%fair motlerab E X "West" 10b AIL Lot 17.2 172 oast r -d Sequoia sempervlrens 60/12 70160 67%fair modem. E X "West" IM Alt.Lot 4J8 4J.8 oastr -d Swluola sempervirens 80/18 7M0 70%good good E X "West" loo, Alt.Lot 26.8 26.8 oastr -d Swluola sampervlrens 80112 70/60 68%fair good W X West" loll Alt.Lot 27.4 27.0 oastr -d Swluola sampervlrens 80112 70160 70%good good W X "West" 1052 AIL Lot 29.6 29.6 ..a trWwootl Spools sampervlrens 80/12 70160 68%fair good W X west" AIL Lot L—tod on strop lots „West" 23.2 23.2 oast rW d Sequoia samPervlrens 80/12 70/50 64%foir good 3 X slope.Possible stability issues? AIL Lot Located an steep 10& „West" 24.6 24.6 oastr -d Swluola s—Ponlm- 80110 70150 65%fair good 3 X Mode.Possible stability issues? AIL Lot L—d on steep 1055 „West" 27.8 27.8 oastr -d Swluola s—Ponlm- 80/13 70/50 67%foir good 3 X slope.Possible stability issues? lo56 Alt.Lot 25.8 25.8 oastr -d Swluola s—Ponlm- 80/12 SW60 57%foir poor.motl X West" 1057 AIL Lot 27.0 27.0 oast r -d Sequoia sempon lmns 75/15 70170 70%good good X West" 1018 Alt.Lot 28.7 28.7 oast r -d Swluola sempoml—s 75/18 7M0 70%good good X Sbunk w C-feet "West" elevation. 105e Alt'Lot 28.3 ..6 51.3 oast retlw°°E Sequoia sempervlrens 80/18 70/60 68X fair mod g.erate[0 2 X "West" 20%very lower 1060 Alt.Lot„West" X 7.6 7.6 wNXa altler Al—rhomOHolla 181'/ 9W10 poor poor X tmnk X 81 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`, Eg oB S _ C oc _ t $ :: E E'c F Scientific Name L X o= i 9 - q+ v m e p.y WLCA Notes from Ipdated Overall Condition E°& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n i'm g ; - Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aP,ciea) a: ¢ m u b mow c - c , c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYRpFc O o ONWARD 2 dE E8_- e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae t3 e? �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ �'° All.Lot S-imnk form 1p61 „West" 18.6 18.6 Deaf radwootl Sequo/a sempervirens 6W12 7W55 6l%fair 0ootl W X batwe,n zere antl iS Teat. 1062 AIL Lot 8.8 8.8 oact r -d Sequo/a sempervirens 4S18 70165 70%gootl 0ootl S X West" w63 Alt.Lot 18.0 18.0 aaetrWwootl Sequoia sempervlrens 6W12 70/65 68%fair moderate gwtl[o X West" 106r Alt.Lot 122 12.2 Sham,lash F7axlnua OM MO 50/5O %%fair poor.motl W X West" 1p65 AIL Lot 12.0 12.0 Sham,l a,h F7ax/nua uhd.1 35/25 80160 67%fair good SW SW X West" Requires entlwelght reductlon pruning. 1066 Alt.Lot 32.2 32.2 INlian awns pin, Plnus pines 30140 75145 %%fair 0ootl S y No.trunk re"West" ud.narrow mePolnt below Requires endwelght reductlon pruning. 1067 Alt.Lot 257 25.7 INlian awn,pin, Plnus plow 2WS 65140 52%Nir motleraN S S 6 No.trunk re"West" ud.narrow meaoolnt below sta&M Wahl. Requires entlwelght reductlon pruning. 1068 Alt.Lot 24.6 24.6 INlian awn,pins Plnus plow MS 75160 66%Nir flood 12 No.trunk re"West" ud.narrow meaoolnt below Requires entlwelght reductlon pruning. 1we Alt.Lot 24.2 24.2 INlian sw-pine Plnus plow 30/35 75160 68%Nir 0ootl N 18 No.trunk re"West" ud.narrow me Point below I_ Alt.Lot X 15A 15A Non.rey pin, Pl.-mdb. 20/20 30/20 25%wry poor poor S 1 X I- Alt'Lot 8.0 8.0 honey locust GNdgsla Macao.- 2WIS 35140 37%poor poor X West" 1072 Alt'Lot 8.3 8.3 honey locust GNdgsla Macao.- MIS 40/25 33%poor poor W X West" 1073 Alt'Lot 8.8 8.9 honey locust GNdgsla Macao.- 2S/20 40/40 40%poor poor X "West" 1074 Alt'Lot 8.2 8.2 honey locust GNdgsla Macao.- 25/20 40/40 0%poor poor X West" 1075 Alt.Lot X 7. .6 25%wry „West, 6 7 wergre,n pwr Pyrus kawakamll iW13 2S/25 poor very poor W X FirebligM infection lo76 Alt.Lot X 8. .8 25%very „West" 8 8 wergre,n pwr Pyrus kawakamll 20/20 2S125 poor very poor S X FirebligM infection 1077 Alt.Lot 12.8 12.8 „West" wergre,n pwr Pyrus kawakamll 90Y30 90140 95%pow motlaraN X FirebligM inaction 82 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C IT _ t $ :: u E E'c F Scientific Name L X o= i 9 e- q+ v m e p.y WLCA Notes from Updated Overall CondIIIon Ea& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n i'71 a Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) u b mow c - c ° c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 dE E8_- e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae 8e? �Lti e.a 2$ 02 UOo ¢cgnw° Ea $'c iA F, t E'E z +079 All.L. 9.2 9.2 honey locust Gbdlfsla Wacanfhos 22/25 65160 63%fair W. X "West" I_ Alt.Lot 6.7 6.7 honey locust Gbdlfsla Wacanfhw MIS 65155 60%fair mWtl, X "West" +w0 Alt'Lot 8.5 8.5 honey locust Gkdsla Wacanbw 25120 65160 63%fair moderate X West" AIL Lot Will need en-i,l +w+ „West" 19.8 19.8 Iblienswn,pin, Plnus plow 30/00 8W70 75%good good E reduction pruning if retained. Will need endweigM AIL Lot reducion pmning if +ohs „West" 32.8 32.8 INlienabnapina Plnus pl- 35/30 80160 67%fair good 3 1s retained.Note: etl at 2 het aelevation. WIII need +w3 Alt.Lot 221 22.1 Iblian awns pine Plnus pl.. 30/30 80165 69%fair good N N entivrelght "West" red-lon pruning N retained. +wa Alt.Lot 239 23.9 INlien awn,pin, Plnus plow 25125 75145 52%fair good 3 y Note:measured at3 "West" feet elevation. +w6 AIL Lot 18.a 18.a INlien awn,pin, Plnus pl- 28130 solso 62%fair good 3 y feet elevatio Nob:ml-ti.n. "West" . +w6 Alt.Lot 17.6 17.6 INlien awn,pin, Plnus plow 30125 80/65 72%good good S-k form. "West" Alt.Lot (dead standing (daadsNMlnB frwl 13/9 0/0 0%dwd X+w7 ^West" s.a as tree) +wa Alt.Lot 7.0 7.0 6.5 20.2 wet r -d Sequoia s-Pervlrens 25110 80/80 80%good good x ^wwt^ +we Alt.Lot 7.5 7.2 wet r -d Sequoia s-P-Imns 25110 80/80 80%good good x ^west^ +w0 Alt.Lot c5 c5 oactr -d Sequoias-P-Imns 1818 80/80 80%good good X west^ +oN AIL Lot 12.5 12.5 wet r -d Sequoia s-P-Imns 30/10 70NO 70%good good x ^west^ +w2 Alt.Lot 0.7 4.1 8.8 oactr -d Sequoia sempervirens 2W13 80/80 80%good good x ^wwt^ +w3 Alt.Lot 5.7 5.3 11.0 oast re .d Sequoia sempervlrens 25112 80/80 80%good good X "West" +Wa Alt.Lot ila 13.0 oast re .d Sequoia sempervlrens 3W11 70160 66%fair moss X "West" 83 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`, Eg oB S _ C If _ t 8 :: E E'c F Scientific Name L 8 - q+ v m e P.y WLCA Notes from Ipdalod Overall CondIIIon E°& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n 71 ; - Ratings&NOTEB 2017 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aP,ciea) e ¢ m u b mow c - c c c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYRpFcE� O o ONWARD 2 dE E8_- e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 :a SEe3 go as iae r3a �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo �'- ¢0gnw° 0.8 $'c iA uO�Eo °z Trunk aiam,Nr Alt.Lot 20%vary wtimaroa.Tree has 1w6 "West" X 62.0 42.0 INlien abna Pin, PI.-P)wa 25Y90 80/0 pour gootl Nilaastructurelly, antl is lying the groans.. 1w6 AIL Lot 31.8 31.8 INlienabnapina Plnus plow 25/25 SO/SS 64%fair goon N N Tmnk measuretlM "West" grow-rovatlon. _7 Alt.Lot X 19.2 19.2 tulip tree Llrbtlen-mIipM 3W12 2M5 25%very very Poor X West" poor 1w8 AIL Lot 7 12.6 12.6 Nlip tree Llrbdentlron mllpMere 2SI10 40/90 90%poor poor X West" I_ Alt.Lot 27.9 27.9 INlienabnapina Plnus plow 35/45 85/55 70%gootl goon SW SW 20 Nwtls endw-Ight "West" reduction praning. Tmnk dlameror wtimarod.Tres has 110o Alt.Lot 26.0 26.0 INlien abna pin, Plnus pl.. 20/95 O/O 0%tl d fall-d shucturally, "West" antl Is lying on M- g-d as dead ood . pines appear to be falling I.... small dlameNr planter 11ol Alt.Lot 7 18.9 18.9 INlien abna pin, Plnus plow 40/90 solso %%Nir goon NW NW as,due ro thelr "West" root d-lopm-nt having been -rely restdctw In terms of roterel Same as'notes'for 1102 Alt.Lot 7 38.9 38.9 INlien abna Pin, Plnus plow 40/28 80/47 60%Nir goon SW SW treeg1101.Tmnk "West" 11. ..measuretl a[tfoot elevatlon. Same as'noros'for 'West t0%ory goon S S dlamar0mea-d 1109Alt [ X 24.7 24.7 INlien abna pin, Plnus plow 30/25 60N M 2 Net-1-vat1on. Same as'noros'for I_ Alt.Lot X 28.0 28.0 INlien abna pin, Plnus Pl." 2=0 O/O 0%tl d treeg1101.Tmnk "West" diameter measuretl at 2 Net elevwlon. Recommend -of two Alt.Lot Euwtyfpus mwtlominant 1106 „West" 5.0 4.5 8.5 river retl gum cama/au/enaia MO 80/45 60%Nir gootl 1 X malnstems at Me fork w 1 foot elevation. ou[hern Roots tlamagea on 1106 X 8.0 8.0 magnolia Magnola gmnd8iora 2WI6 MO SO%Nir poor N motl X gratle from mowing activities. ou[harn Roots tlamagea on 1107 X 6.8 6.8 magnolia Magnolia gmnd8iora 2WI6 MO SO%Nir poor N motl X gratle from mowing activities. soutfwrn Roots tlamagea on 110a X g.0 8.0 magnolia Magnolia gnM)gox 29/20 SW55 SS%Nir poor N motl X gratle--mowing activities. Roots tlamaged 110e X 41.8 41.8 Shamel a,h F7axlnus uhdel 65160 80160 79%gootl goon E X hom recent cuM replac-m-n[ ac[Nltles. Roots tlamaged 111. X 10.5 10.5 Shamel a,h FY-I-uh" 3S/20 90/90 30%poor poor W X gr 6 X hom recen[cuM replacement ac[Nltles. 84 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 Eg oB S _ C oc _ t $ :: E E'c F Scientific Name L 9 - q+ v m e p.y WLCA Notes from Updated Overall CondIIIon E& $A y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c S o n_ c - n `o ' n i'71 - Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 4444 y a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPooio.) a: ¢ m ub mow c - c c c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYRpFc O o ONWARD 2 dE E8_- e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go as iae. 8a �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo ¢12 A.w' Ea $'c iA 5 'E S, z Roo,tlamaged X 14.7 14.7 ShamelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdol 40/20 30/30 30%poor poor E X gr 10 X from rec.ntcurb replacement ac[Nltl.s. Roots tlamaged 1112 X 26.6 26.6 ShamelasM1 Fraxlnus uhdol 65/35 60160 60%fair mwooto SW gr X from rec.ntcurb replacement ac[Nltl.s. High dsk situation: Split"hanger"Ilmb 1- X 33.5 33.5 ShamelasM1 Fraxlnus.hold TWO 65/55 60%fair mW.roto 35 gr X n-d a[35 feet eI-ollon on nodh side of canopy needs to b. 19.2 19.2 Shamel a,h Fraxlnus.hold 35/35 85165 75%gootl Sow S S X X Roots tlamaged on (monNar the glrtlling a.dous Shod..Note souse 1113 root sXuatlon) 22.8 22.8 Shamel aeM1 Faxlnus.hold 9SY35 80/30 45X poor Sootl E E girrtlolibnS X gimilhg root sltuMlon. Roots 1-god on 1116 24.2 24.2 Shamel ash Faxlnus uhdol 40140 80/55 65%ftir Sow X gr X ghotl,from mowing activities. throughout Roots tlamagetl on 24.7 24.7 ShamelasM1 Fraxlnus uhtlel 45I40 40/30 35%poor poor E nopy X grad.from mowing activities. Roots damaged on 111. 23.0 23.0 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhdol SW40 60/50 55%ftir W.rob, W W X X ghotl.from mowing activities. Roots damaged on grade from mowing 111. X 18.6 18.6 Shamel ash Fraxlnus uhdol 4S/20 15/15 15�oery very poor X gr actwitl.s. Recommend ov.tree dn.to .hon Roots 1-god on 112. 26.7 26.7 Shamel aeh Faxlnus.hold SW40 75/65 70%gootl gootl N E X X ghotl,from mowing activities. Roots damaged on 1121 19.7 19.7 Shamel aeh Faxlnus uhdol 50/35 80/65 76%gootl gootl W W X X grad.from mowing activities. Roots damaged on grad.from mowing 21.4 21.4 Shamel a,h Fraxlnus uhdol 60/35 40140 0%poor poor W X 0 to 2 X aoth,lti-V.hlcl, collision c....d damage to trunk between x.ro.nd 2 Roots damaged on gr.d.from mowing 1121 18.5 18.5 Shamel aeh Fraxlnus uhdol 55/30 65155 58%f tir mw oto W X gr X activities.Root plate .pp.,..daces are -P..tl. Roots damaged on gr.d.from mowing 15.5 15.5 Shamel aeh Faxlnus.hold 30/18 40/30 35%poor poor W X gr X activities.Root plate .pp.,..daces are -P..tl. Roots tlamaged on 1121 13.8 13.8 Shamel ash Faxlnus.hold 4W0 50/30 0%poor motlerab W S x giwliinS x grade from mowing. root Nob severe girdling roe situation. TREE REMOVED FROM LANDSCAPE. 85 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 vae Eg oB S _ C oc _ t $ :: E ES F Icientific Name L r X o= i 9 - q+ v me P.y WLCA Notes from Ip aatetl Overall CondIIIan E& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c S o n_ c - n `o ' n i'71 Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) a: n = u b mow c - c 0 c E u Spring 2015 Survey >3E� n x x x i x x miG n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O E��o fr ._ ONWARD 2 dE E8_- e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 :a SEe3 go as iae 8ez �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo of ¢&Xffll Ea $'c iA uO�Eo °z X 2.7 2.7 red maple Aaa,rub- 1618 80/85 80%0ood Good Chlarotic follage.Sall malstum tleflclt. 112a X 1.9 1.9 red maple Aaa,mb- 1316 60160 60%Fair Mod Chlorotic follage.Sall molsture deficit. 112. X 2.0 2.0 red maple Aaa,mb- 1316 5S/55 55%Fair Mod Chlorotic follage.Sall molsture deficit. 113o X 1.8 1.8 red maple Aaa,mb- 1015 MS 35%Poor Poor Chlorotic folla{p.Sall m.I-. da0clt. 1131 X 1.9 1.9 red maple Aaa,mb- 11/5 MS 35%Poor Poor Chlorotic folla{p.Sall m.I-. da0clt. 1132 X 1.4 1.4 red maple Aaa,mb- 9/5 MS 35%Poor Poor Chlorotic follage.Sall molsture deficit. 1133 X 1.9 1.9 red maple A-rubrum 1316 37145 39%Poor Poor Chlorotic follage.Sall molsture tleflclt. Purple Robe locust Rob/n/.'Purple Robe' 20/12 05/65 7.%Gootl North 91.. Removetl as of Jan,202 X 4.5 Purple Robe locust Robinla'Purple Robe' 20/12 05/65 ]0%Gootl North Oto2feet. Removetl as of Jan,2020. X 3.2 Purple Robe locust Rob/n/.'Purple Robe' 25/12 7-/ 7.%Good Mod Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1137 X 4.7 4.7 Purple Robe locust Robinla'Purple Robe' 20/13 ]0/50 60%Falr Mod 1 to 4I.M. Removetl as of Jan,2020. 113. X 3.6 3.6 Purple Robe locust R.-.'Purple Robe' 20/12 M. 7.%Gootl Mod Removetl as of Jan,2020. X 3.7 3.7 Purple Robe locust Rob/n/,'Purple Robe' 20113 7WO 70%Gootl Mod West Removetl as of Jan,2020. 86 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Egoo S �q adao & u a _ F' _ C oc _ t 8 :: a E " E'c F Scientific Name L 8 c- q+ v m e C y WLCA Notea from Uptlatetl Overall Condi[lon x Ea S $e y rc r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o n ,ti m g - Ratings&NOTES 2017 y =a c c c c c c _m„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) a: ¢ m u b mow c - c c c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEaYp$5$c ONWARD 2 dEE' = e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma Z'Ee3 go as iae 8a �Lti aQ 2O °2 U' & of ¢cR a°wn a8 �'c.A UOIEa °z Fr A Rowering pear Pyius calleryana 1311D 40/6D 45%Poor Removetl as of Jan,2020. 0.4 4.4 Purple Robe locuat Robinia'Purple Robe' 2115 1-1 55%Fair Pcor to Motl North 0to 5f0et. Removed-Jan,2020. 3.7 Purple Robe locuat Robinia'Purple Robe' 2- 05170 701Gcod Motl Removedaso(Jan,2020. 11K X &4 5.4 Purple Robe locust Robini -rple Robe' 2-10 05/5s 65%Fair Motl to Good oto 6faet Removed as of Jan,2020. X 3.8 3.0 Purple Robe locust Robini -rple Robe' 2-12 70/60 60%Fair Motl Removed as of Jan,2020. 11K X 3.4 3.4 Purple Robe locuat Robinia'Purple Robe' 2-12 7-s 61%Fair Motl oto 8feat Removed as of Jan,2020. 11K X 3.4 3.4 Purple Robe locuat Robinia'Purple Robe' 1.13 7-7 64%Fair Motl oto 5faet Removed as of Jan,2020. X 0.1 4.1 Purple Robe locuat Robinia'Purple Robe' 2&14 05175 00%Gcod Motl to Gootl Removed as of Jan,2020. 11K X 0.2 4.2 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 2- 65/40 46%Pcor Motl oto to feet Removetl as of Jan,2020. 11K X 0.7 4.7 Purple Robe locuat Robinia'Purple Robe' 2.13 7-7 63%Fair Motl oto 6feat Removed as of Jan,2020. 1150 X &6 - Purple Robe locuat Robinia'Purple Robe' 2- 70/58 66%Fair Gootl 0to 7faet Removed as of Jan,2020. 1151 X &0 &0 Purple Robe locuat Robinia'Purple Robe' 27/10 05/60 72%Gcod Motl to Gootl Removed as of Jan,2020. 1112 X 3.6 3.6 Purple Robe locuat Robinia'Purple Robe' 22110 s-s 40%Pcor Pcor to Motl West West Oto4faet Removed as of Jan,2020. 87 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Egoo _ C o c _ t 8 :: u E " E'c F Scientific Name L X o= i 8 e- q+ v m e P.y WLCA Note,from Uptlatetl Overall Condi[lon Ea S $e y rc r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c Ratings&NOTES 2011 y =a c c c c c c _m„ $o (Genoa,aPecfea) a: ¢ m u b mow c - c , c E u Spring 2015 Survey m �qc , n x x x i x x miG w m �a 22me qEEa .Faw g Yp$5$c _ ns o� EE ��o f1 ._ ONWARD Z'Ee3 go as iae 8,? �Lti aQ 2O o2 ¢cR o°wn a8 �'c.A uO�Eo °z Purple Robe locust obinia'Purple Robe' 20/11 sMs 48%Poor Poor as ,et Removetl as of Jan,2020. 2.T Nowering pear Pyrus calleryana 1N 50/50 50%Fair Mod W,at Removedaaof Jan,2020. 3.0 Nowering pear Pyrus calleryana 10l] 50/50 S0%Fair Mod Wect Removetlaaof Jan,2020. Various 3.8 Purple Robe locust Robinla'Purple Robe' 19/10 85/55 59%Fair Poor to Motl alev. Removetl as of Jan,2020. Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 1-10 ]5/60 6fi%Fair Mod W,at Removetlaaof Jan,2020. At.b,f et 4.1 4.1 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 1-12 00/60 60°o Fair and ten Removetlaaof Jan,2020. feet. X si si Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 20/10 BSI]0 00%Gaotl Gootl Removetlaaof Jan,2020. 1160 X 3.6 3.s Nowering pear Pyrus calleryana 14/0 25/25 MVery Removetl a a of Jan,2020. Poor 1161 X 6.1 4.1 Nowering pear Pyrus calleryana 12/9 50/50 5.%Fair Mod Removetl a a of Jan,2020. 1162 X 6.1 4.1 Nowering pear Pyrus calleryana 13/9 40/40 40%Poor Poor Removetl a a of Jan,2020. 1- X 9.8 3A Nowering pear Pyrus calleryana 13/8 00/80 00%Gootl Gootl Removed a a of Jan,2020. 11W X S.1 si Purple robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 3-2 ]5/55 .3%Fair Mod 0to 6 feel. Removetl a a of Jan,2020. LL 1165 X 5.4 5.4 Purple robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 30/20 00/60 ]5%Gaotl Gootl 1lo Steel. Removetl as o(Jan,2020. 88 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Egoo _ C oc _ t 8 :: u E " E'c F Scientific Name L 8 a- q+ v m c P.y WLCA Note,from U RI ated Overall C,ndIIIon Ee S $e y rc r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o n ,ti m g .- Ratings&NOTES 2017 y =a c c c c c c _m„ $o (Genoa,aPecfea) s: ¢ m u b mow c - c a c E u Spring Ms Survey 22me qEEa .Faw g Y$5Pc _ ns H. EE JE.3o ft ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 ma Z'Ee3 go as iae 8a �Lti aQ Al0 02 U' & of�,$ �'a ¢cR a°di a8 �'c.A uOV-Eo °z pr o Purple robe locust binie'Purple Robe' M. MD 64%Fair o0 o Removed as of Jan,2020. 8 Rowering pear Pyrus calleryana - 40/40 40%Poor Pao, Removedasof Jan,2030. 5.1 Rowering pear Pyrus calleryana 1.12 —0 60%Fair Good Removedasof Jan,2020. 1169 X -7 4.7 Purple robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 2.16 65/65 74%Good Good Removed as of Jan,2020. 1170 X 6.7 4.7 Purple robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 2.15 60/65 70%Good Mad Removedasof Jan,2030. 1171 X 5.2 5.2 Purple robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 21116 65/60 70%Good Good At is feet Removedasof Jan,2030. X s. S.o Purple robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 2.16 ­0 69%Fair Good Nodh North w,,t 5to 6 feet. Removedasof Jan,2020. 1176 X 3.2 3.2 Rowering pear Pyrus calleryana - —0 60%Fair Good Removedasof Jan,2030. 1171 X 2.6 2.s Rowering pear Pyrus calleryana 91s —0 30%Poor Pao, Removedasof Jan,2g20. 1171 X 6.3 - Rowering pear Pyrus calleryana 2.16 60l]5 75%Good Good Removed as of Jan,2020. 1176 X 6.3 4.3 Rowering pear Pyrus calleryana 17112 6-s 6s%Fat, Good Removed as of Jan,2020. 1177 X 6.3 6.3 P,rple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 3-3 50130 30%Poor Good oto is feet Removed as of Jan,2020. 1179 X 5.1 S.1 Parple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 3-3 50130 30%Poo, Mod Oto Bfaet Removed as of Jan,2020. 89 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Egoo _ C oc _ t 8 :: a E " E'c F Scientific Name L X o= i 8 c- q+ v m e P.y WLCA Notes from Uptlatetl Overall Condition x Ea S $e y rc r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o n ,ti m g - Ratings&NOTES 2017 y =a c c c c c c _m„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) a: ¢ m u b mow c - c c c E u Spring 2015 Survey miG 22me qEEaY$5Pc ��o ONWARD Z'Ee3 go as iae r3a 2Lti aQ 20 °2 U' & of�,$ ¢cR o°wn a8 �'c.A uO�Eo °z Rowering pear Pyrus calleryana 12/7 40/4D 40%Poor Pcor to Removetl as of Jan,2020. 0.7 4.7 Purple Robe locust Robini-rple Robe' 24/15 00/fi0 70%Gcod Motl N-h Removedasol Jan,2020. 4.0 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 2-14 7-0 70%Gcod Motl Removedasor Jan,2020. 1182 X &1 5.1 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 23/1fi 05/60 70%Gootl Gootl At het. Removetl as o(Jan,2020. 1- X 4.0 4.0 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 22/13 00/fi0 fi7%Fair Good 3to 5het Removed as or Jan,2020. 11N X 3.8 3.0 Rowering pear Pyrus calleryana 1- 50/50 50%Fair Mad Removed as or Jan,2020. 1188 X 2.3 2.3 Rowering pear Pyrus calleryana - s5/55 55%Fair Motl Removed as or Jan,2020. 1186 X 2.7 2.7 Rowering pear Pyrus calleryana - 55/55 55%Fair Mad Removed as or Jan,2020. 11.1 X 3.3 3.3 Rowering pear Pyrus calleryana - 35/35 35%Poor Motl 0to 4 het Removed as or Jan,2020. 1188 X 5.5 s.s Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 28/10 75/30 35%Poor Gootl Oto Shot Removetl as or Jan,2020. 1- X &8 s.0 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 3-2 fi5/25 30%Poor Gootl oto 8het Removetl as or Jan,2020. 1190 X 0.4 0.4 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 3-10 s0/30 37%Poor Motl to Gootl At various Removetl as or Jan,2020. alev. 1181 X 6.8 6.8 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 35/23 fis/20 25p-dry Gootl Oto lO het Removetl as or Jan,2020. 90 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e o S �q _ C oc _ u .2 " E'c F Scientific Name L X o= i 9 e- q+ v '1 m e C y WLCA Notes from Uptlatetl Overall Condi[lon ES $e y rc r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o n ,ti m g - Ratings&NOTES 2017 y =a c c c c c c _m„ $o (Genoa,aP-io.) a: ¢ m u b mow c - c a c E u Spring 2015 Survey m �qc , o x x x i x x miG w m �a 22me qEEa .Faw g Y$5Pc _ ns E� EE ��o fr ._ ONWARD 2 dEE' = 2 2 2 ma Z'Ee3 go as iae 8ez �Lti aQ 20 92 °2 U' & of ¢cR o°wn n8 �'c.A u0 1 S to Rowering pear Pyi.s calleryana 11RI M. 30%Poor Poor Removetl as of Jan,2020. 4 Rowering pear Pyi.s calleryana 1017 s-s 55%Fair Pcor to Motl Removedasof Jan,M20. st Porple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' -8 smo 45%Poor Paor to Motl oto S feet. Removedasof Jan,M20. 1198 X 0.5 4.5 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 2.15 -0 50%Fair Motl 3to 4 feel Removed as of Jan,M20. 1196 X 5.3 s3 Porple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' M18 6-s 40%Poor Motl oto1 Removed as of Jan,2020. 1197 X 5.0 5.0 Porple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 2.18 S-o 37%Poor Motl oto 6 feet. Removed as of Jan,2020. 111. X 0.9 4.8 Porple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 2.18 6-s 45%Poor Motl oto 5 feet. Removed as of Jan,2020. 119. X 3.6 3.6 Porple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 2.16 6-0 60%Fair Paor to Motl Removed as of Jan,2020. 120o X 0.3 4.3 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 21118 6-s 40%Poor Motl oto 6 feel Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1201 X 3.8 3.8 Porple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 2V18 6-0 60%Fair Paor to Motl Removed as of Jan,2020. 1.2 x 0.3 4.3 Porple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' M18 7-0 66%Fair Motl Removed as of Jan,2020. 1.3 X 5.0 5.0 Porple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 2-2 7-s 45%Poor Good oto 5f m. Removed as of Jan,2020. 1204 lr A6 A6 Porple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 221i6 S-o 40%Poor Paor to Motl oto 5 feel Removed as of Jan,2020. 91 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Egoo _ C oc _ t 8 :: a E " E'c F Scientific Name L 8 a- q+ v m c P.y WLCA Note,from U RI an Overall C,ndIIIon x Ee S $e y rc r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o n t'm g - Ratings&NOTES 2017 y =a c c c c c c _m„ $o (Genoa,aPecfea) s: ¢ m u b mow c - c a c E u Spring 2015 Survey 22me qEEa .Faw g Y$5Pc _ ns o� EE JE.3o fr ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 ma Z'Ee3 go as iae 8,z �Lti aQ 20 02 U' & of�,$ �'a ¢cR a°di a8 �'c.A uOV-Eo °z Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' M1 55130 36%Paor Poor o Removed as of Jan,2020. S.2 1.2 Purple Robelocuat Robinia'Purple Robe' 1-1 1-1 6011.Fair Gootl 0to 9 feet. Removetlaso(Jan,2020. 4.3 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' -0 0 8 75%Gootl Gootl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1MB X .5 3.5 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' -16 BSI]0 ]]%Gootl Gootl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1Me X 6.5 4.5 Rowering pear Pyrus calleryana 1-lo -s 45%Poor Matl Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1210 X 9.0 3.0 Rowering pear Pyrus calleryana 1- 3-s 35%Poor Paor Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1211 X 2.9 2.9 Rowering pear Pyrus calleryana 1- 40/40 40%Poor Paor Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1212 X 12 4.2 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 2.13 fi5145 49%Poor Motl to Gootl 0 to 3 feet. Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1211 X 6.2 4.2 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 2.15 50/30 37%Poor Motl 0to 4fe,L Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1211 X 12 4.2 Purple Robe locust Robinia'Purple Robe' 2.17 7-0 66%Fair Mod to Gootl 3to 4feet. Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1211 X 6.3 4.3 Rowering pear Pyrus calleryana 2-12 3-0 30%Poor Paor Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1216 X 3.2 3.2 Rowering pear Pyrus calleryana 1- 70/65 68%Fair Mad Removetl as of Jan,2020. 1211 X 9.2 9.2 Rowering pear Pyrus calleryana 1]I] fi0/55 Sfi%Fair P.-to Motl Removetl as o(Jan,2020. 92 of 95 R.I.g.&NOT S2017 ONWARD .h.p.d.g'1223". Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 v`e Eg oB S _ C o c _ t $ :: E E'c F Scientifl fic Name L 9 a- q+ v m e P.y WLCA Notes from Iptlaled Overall CondIIIon x Ea& $c y¢ r c —'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n i'71 a Ratings&NOTES 2017 N 444p44 =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) e ¢ m u b mow E u Spring 2015 Survey >tg � n x x x i x x mitp n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O E��o fl ._ ONWARD 2 2 2 2 2 2 ma SEe3 go Is as iae 8ez �Lti as 2$ 02 UOo ¢cgnwn n8 Was a4 uO�Eo °z 1z91 Est.22 Est.22 ....tr -d Sequoia sempervlrens awls 501so 50%Fair Poor to Mod 1232 ESL 2A ESL 20 oaet r -d Sequoia sempervlrens SW40 MS 35%Poor Poor 1233 Est.18 Est.18 ...t r -d Sequoia sempervlrens 7S115 40140 40%Poor Poor No access to bunk base.Tres was no[taggetl by WLCA. 1234 X Est.15 Est.15 ...t r -d Sequoia s—Pa ... 4SI13 65165 65%Fair Mod This tree was"rough plotted" by WLCA,and added to the Sandi.tree map sheets. 1235 ESL 22 ESL 22 ....tr -d Sequoia sempervlrens 75113 55155 55%Fair Poor to Mod Dense gr,lharountl base. Two wide-forked cotlominaM mist al 16 fret I.. Est.26 Est.26 ...t rWwood Sequoia sem3reralmns 60116 50145 48%Poor Poor to Mod ab.-g.d.. Dense growth arountl base. 1231 ESL 20 ESL 20 ....tr -d Sequoia sempervlrens 65116 40140 40%Poor Poor Dena.groanh around base. 123a ESL 22 ESL 22 ....tr -d Sequoia sempervlrens 68116 50150 50%Fair Poor to Mod Dena.gr..h around base. 123. Est.15 ESL 15 ....tr -d Sequoia sempervlrens 55110 M7 44%Poor Poor East Dena.gr.Mh around base. I- Est.32 ESL 32 ....tr -d Sequoia sempervlrens 70125 60160 60%Fair Poor to Mod Dena.gr.Mh around base. Est.22 Est.22 oaet redwood Sequoia semPw mns MIS 45145 45%Poor Poor Dena,growth arountl base. ESL 12 ESL 12 ....tr -d Sequoia sempervlrens W12 60150 55%Fair Poor to Mod Dena.gr.Mh around base. I- ESL 2A ESL 20 oaetr -d Sequoia sempervlrens 60/15 40140 40%Poor Poor Dense gr-1,around base. 94 of 95 Vallco Tree Data by Walter Levison,Consulting Arborist(WLCA) Revised 07/28/2020 _ C oc _ t 8 :: u E E'c F Scientific Name L X o= i 8 e- q+ v m e P.y WLCA Notes from Ipdaled Overall CondIIIon Ea& $c y¢ r c -'o u Common Name _ c$ o n_ c - n `o ' n i'm g - Rabnlls&NOTES 2011 N 4444y =a c c c c c c _mm„ $o (Genoa,aPeciea) a ar m u b mow c - c a c E u Spring 2015 Survey >36� u x x x i x x mit5 n m �a 22me qEEaYRpFc O ONWARD 2 dEE8_- e� 2 2 2 2 2 2 y:a SEe3 go as iae 8a �Lti aQ 2$ 02 UOo of�,$ �'o ¢cgnMn n8 TEE uO�Eo °z X 15.5 1S.S oactr -d Sxluola—P—I... M2 010 0%DEAD Na Podocarpus Tree south removed atwest the flyway Vew pine macropM1ylla 10/6 40/40 40%Poor Paor to Motl britlge comer on u241zozo. NOTES: 1.Neighta were determined using a Nikon Forestry Pro 550 hypsometer.Diameters were determined using a forestry D-tape whi.h converts actual circumference to averaged diameter in inches antl tentbs of incbes. 2.In the original 2015 assignment,Walter Levison tagged antl surveyed only trees 4.0 incbes tliameter antl greater(at 4.5 feet above grade),using round—,d tags M1 tbrougb N.For tree tag numbers above NN,race4ack—"d tags were used,up to tag p1125. 3.Trees—6 through#1105 were to-d in a triangular survey area known as"al[ema[e lot west". d.In a followup assignment in July,2D18,Walter Levison was directed by Vallco Properly Owner LLC to tag antl assess additi.-trees starting with tag#1126,many e(wbich m--d less than 4.0 inches diameter.Moat or all of these supplemental trees were excluded from the original tree study,due to trunk tliameter being below the study threabold of 4.0 inches,antllor location of—k.—id.the original proposetl Vallco project area. 5.Parking lot treec were inatalletl in plactic root barriers whicM1 severely etuntetl trees by limiting ibair root extension.Circular root barriers are consitleretl by arboriets to be a tlirecl cause of lack o(normal tree growlb pertormance antl tree stability. 6.Pedmeter trees bave not been receiving normal irrigation,antl are declining and dying prematurely due W coil moiahre deficit. 95 of 95