CERTIFIED ARBORIST REPORTCommunity Development Department
Planning Division — Cupertino
CUPERTINO APPROVED
Case # TR-2020-017
Application Number(s) ARBORIST REPORT
Approval Body: Director / Staff
Approva I Date 05/27/20
Signature
Ellen Yau
Case Manager
November 4, 2019
5202.00
PROJECT
19900 Stevens Creek
Cupertino, CA
PREPARED FOR
19900 Stevens Creek
PREPARED BY
HMH
1570 Oakland Road
San Jose, CA 95131
William Sowa
ISA Certified Arborist #WE-12270A
Community Development Department
Planning Division — Cupertino TABLE OF CONTENTS
CUPERTINO APPROVED
Case # TR-2020-017
Page
Application Number(s)
Approva l BbVpLgl Conttpt§tall 1
Approva I DRIgb�I I(RII1� �I17T n��PI��IP��� 2
Signature Ellen Yau
et O O ogise Manager 2
Summary of Findings 2
General Observations and Recommendations 3
Recommendations for Tree Protection During Construction 5
Maintenance Recommendations for Trees to Remain 6
Terms and Conditions 8
Exhibit A — Existing Tree Map 9
Table 1 - Tree Quantity Summary 10
Table 2 - Tree Evaluation Summary 11
Tree Photographs 16
1
Community Development Department
IFIIEIPP.I;Iii IAJOSIT A1113"M EVIEW
CUPERTINO APPROVED
HMH wajsoti �q complete a survey, assessment and arborist report for trees located within
Case # tha limit i i b-d nn Fxhohit A. The project consists of hardscape and landscape
upgradg%P" "ri'dmAA l(S6xisting retail center. The project has had some parking lot and tree
mi i a,t{on done e y and this phase of the project is to create some outdoor amenity spaces
Approva l B yutov o-Our scope of services includes locating, measuring DBH, assessing, and
Approva I DpR@toargdW�2ghe condition of all trees within the limit of work. Disposition and health
Signature recglraAiations are based on current site conditions. Site development/design may affect the
preservation,- % +ipgy.
METHODOLOGY
Our tree survey work is a deliberate and systematic methodology for cataloging trees on site:
1. Identify each tree species.
2. Note each tree's location on a site map.
3. Measure each trunk circumference at 4.5' above grade per ISA standards.
4. Evaluate the health and structure of each tree using the following numerical standard:
5 - A healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of disease, with good structure and form typical of the species.
4 - A tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor structural defects that could be
corrected.
3 - A tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, thinning of crown, poor leaf
color, moderate structural defects that may that might be mitigated with care.
2 - A tree in decline, epicormic growth, extensive dieback of medium to large branches, significant
structural defects that cannot be abated.
1 - A tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and or trunk, mostly epicormic growth;
extensive structural defects that cannot be abated.
0 - Tree is dead.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
HMH conducted a tree inventory of 62 trees located within the limit of work outlined in Exhibit A.
Per City of Cupertino ordinance any tree removed needs to be mitigated. These requirements can
be found under their protected tree ordinance. Chapter 14.18
Of the 62 trees on site the Camphor Tree and Canary Island Pine make up 58% of the site
trees. Table 1 - Tree Quantity Summary summarizes tree quantities by both species and size.
Each species that was inventoried as part of this scope is included. This is a useful tool for
analyzing the mixture of trees as part of the project.
Table 2 - Tree Evaluation Summary lists each tree number, botanical name, common name, DBH,
circumference, ordinance trees, health rating, preservation suitability, general notes and
observations.
See Exhibit A for Existing Tree Map
See Table 1 for Tree Quantity Summary by species and size.
See Table 2 for Tree Evaluation Summary for sizes, notes and recommendations regarding each
tree.
Community Development Department
GIB&M"LDrk131%ffiRAMTii:SoAND RECOMMENDATIONS
CUPERTINO APPROVED
Species!c26/10VYoxylon (Black Acacia)
Case # Qua„ti}
Obse4SCi1b%'§n/"i%V6th men dations:
Th B ck cac' is i moderate health. It is currently crowded by an offsite pine tree and adjacent
Approva I Bhp i�r °. �� crowding is creating some canopy structure defects and limiting natural
Approva I Ddt�elon� �runina the Dine tree or removing the Acacia should be explored as to benefit one
Signature or t"&tlN�
Case Manager
Species: Acer rubrum `Armstrong' (Armstrong Red Maple)
Quantity: 11
Observations / Recommendations:
All of the Red Maples are newly planted and are in good shape. Regular pruning by a qualified
landscape contractor should be done as the trees mature to assure proper canopy structure.
Species: Cinnamomum camphora (Camphor Tree)
Quantity: 20
Observations / Recommendations:
Almost all the Camphor trees are in poor shape. They are in a state of decline, show extensive
crown dieback on many branches resulting in poor canopy development and structural defects.
Trees 28-35 are in a very narrow planting strip adjacent to the building and have been pruned
away from the building. These trees develop broad canopies so locating them here was improper.
Species: Ligustrum (Privet)
Quantity: 2
Observations / Recommendations:
The Privet trees are generally classified as an invasive tree as they propagate voluntarily from
other adjacent trees. It is uncertain if the two trees on the site were planted or were volunteers.
Tree 9 is in a serious state of decline and should be removed, tree 12 has poor structure and
crown die back.
Species: Pinus canariensis (Canary Island Pine)
Quantity: 16
Observations / Recommendations:
The Pine trees are along the west side of the building and been pruned up over the top of the
building which presents a top-heavy tree. This "lion tail" pruning method is not healthy for the tree
structure and can create a hazard under high wind conditions. Other than that, the trees are in
moderate shape.
Species: Pyrus calleryana (Ornamental Pear)
Quantity: 4
Observations / Recommendations:
The Pyrus trees are in moderate shape. They have irregular canopy structure potentially due to
poor maintenance practices. Many are showing signs of fire blight on a number of branches in
the canopy and have some crown die back. Removal of these branches using proper pruning
methods for fire blight should commence and these trees be monitored for the return of any
symptoms.
Community Development Department
SplWdf.), r ggpR ig�ftsuWrk.00ak)
CUPERTINO Quantity: 1 APPROVED
Case # ObserviTt-WROeRli6mendations:
The Oa�MeoOsNnnsgeol shape and should be protected in place.
Approval Bg04ciQif?SWkA 4#mpervirens (Coast Redwood)
Approva I D ntitg5/(?7/20
Obirv�,tions / Recommendations:
Signature h end_ _ au trees _ _ good shape and look more recently planted. They are in close
proximity tof�ie"�ui ing and are similar in shape and structure to the pine trees in the same
location. The concern is the shape of these trees may face the same fate as the pines if they
are being pruned above the roof line of the building. This should be discouraged. As redwoods
are high water use plants any modification to the understory planting should take this into
consideration from a hydrozone standpoint.
Species: Xylosma congestum (Shiny Xylosma)
Quantity: 1
Observations / Recommendations:
The Xylosma is a shrub that has grown into a small tree. I it located under the caopies of .
Community Development Department
RHLWMWBNI3ibTI40Q2pE10RcTREE PROTECTION DURING CONSTRUCTION
CUPERTINO APPROVED
Site pr xisting trees shall be fenced off 10' beyond the outside the drip line (foliar
Case # spread) h �`I�r�`d- nativaly where this is not feasible, fence to the drip line of the tree. Where
fencing'fflhM'08059? the trunk shall be protected straw waddle and orange snow fencing. The
A rova I gfer�ce hou d b,�t imum of six feet high, made of pig wire with steel stakes or any material
pp g§pCer i�I �iafity, such as cyclone fencing. Tree protection zone sign shall be affixed to fencing
Approva I Dt� y the arborist on site. If the fence is within the drip line of
Signature the Ltrfc�syAe foliar fringe shall be raised to offset the chance of limb breakage from construction
equipment gQpKggphpg wl In e rlp ine. All contractors, subcontractors and other personnel
shall be warned that encroachment within the fenced area is forbidden without the consent of the
certified arborist on the job. This includes, but is not limited to, storage of lumber and other
materials, disposal of paints, solvents or other noxious materials, parked cars, grading equipment
or other heavy equipment. Penalties, based on the cost of remedial repairs and the evaluation
guide published by the international society of arboriculture, shall be assessed for damages to
the trees. See tree preservation detail for additional information, including tree protection zone
sign.
Grading/excavating: All grading plans that specify grading within the drip line of any tree, or
within the distance from the trunk as outlined in the site preparation section above when said
distance is outside the drip line, shall first be reviewed by a certified arborist. Provisions for
aeration, drainage, pruning, tunneling beneath roots, root pruning or other necessary actions to
protect the trees shall be outlined by an arborist. If trenching is necessary within the area as
described above, said trenching shall be undertaken by hand labor and dug directly beneath the
trunk of the tree. All roots 2 inches or larger shall be tunneled under and other roots shall be cut
smoothly to the trunk side of the trench. The trunk side should be draped immediately with two
layers of untreated burlap to a depth of 3 feet from the surface. The burlap shall be soaked nightly
and left in place until the trench is back filled to the original level. An arborist shall examine the
trench prior to back filling to ascertain the number and size of roots cut, so as to suggest the
necessary remedial repairs.
Remedial repairs: An arborist shall have the responsibility of observing all ongoing activities that
may affect the trees, and prescribing necessary remedial work to ensure the health and stability
of the trees. This includes, but is not limited to, all arborist activities brought out in the previous
sections. In addition, pruning, as outlined in the "pruning standards" of the western chapter of the
International Society of Arboriculture, shall be prescribed as necessary. Fertilizing, aeration,
irrigation, pest control and other activities shall be prescribed according to the tree needs, local
site requirements, and state agricultural pest control laws. All specifications shall be in writing.
For pest control operations, consult the local county agricultural commissioner's office for
individuals licensed as pest control advisors or pest control operators.
Final inspection: Upon completion of the project, the arborist shall review all work undertaken
that may impact the existing trees. Special attention shall be given to cuts and fills, compacting,
drainage, pruning and future remedial work. An arborist should submit a final report in writing
outlining the ongoing remedial care following the final inspection.
Community Development Department
WAdfhhTE44[0i.NGUMMD4MMENDATIONS FOR TREES TO REMAIN
CUPERTINO APPROVED
Regular i to n If designed to promote plant health and vigor, ensures longevity of existing
Case # treec R i 1 n tfons and the necessary follow-up care of mulching, fertilizing, and pruning,
can det%PeVJ I''8b �frAd correct them before they become damaging or fatal.
Approva I Byrd
eye W68?1o/nN egular inspections of mature trees at least once a year can prevent or reduce
ApprovaI DMWseJWI(Hiture disease, insect. and environmental problems. During tree inspection, four
Signature chaEqgi§tf'cs of tree vigor should be examined: new leaves or buds, leaf size, twig growth, and
absence o aqE�a,;e ac gra ua eath of the upper part of the tree). A reduction in the
extension of shoots (new growing parts), such as buds or new leaves, is a fairly reliable cue that
the tree's health has recently changed. Growth of the shoots over the past three years may be
compared to determine whether there is a reduction in the tree's typical growth pattern. Further
signs of poor tree health are trunk decay, crown dieback, or both. These symptoms often indicate
problems that began several years before. Loose bark or deformed growths, such as trunk conks
(mushrooms), are common signs of stem decay. Any abnormalities found during these
inspections, including insect activity and spotted, deformed, discolored, or dead leaves and twigs,
should be noted and observed closely.
Mulching: Mulch, or decomposed organic material, placed over the root zone of a tree reduces
environmental stress by providing a root environment that is cooler and contains more moisture
than the surrounding soil. Mulch can also prevent mechanical damage by keeping machines such
as lawn mowers and string trimmers away from the tree's base. Furthermore, mulch reduces
competition from surrounding weeds and turf. To be most effective, mulch should be placed 2 to
4 inches deep and cover the entire root system, which may be as far as 2 or 3 times the diameter
of the branch spread of the tree. If the area and activities happening around the tree do not permit
the entire area to be mulched, it is recommended that as much of the area under the drip line of
the tree is mulched as possible. When placing mulch, care should be taken not to cover the actual
trunk of the tree. This mulch -free area, 1 to 2 inches wide at the base, is sufficient to avoid moist
bark conditions and prevent trunk decay. An organic mulch layer 2 to 4 inches deep of loosely
packed shredded leaves, pine straw, peat moss, or composted wood chips is adequate. Plastic
should not be used as it interferes with the exchange of gases between soil and air, which inhibits
root growth. Thicker mulch layers, 5 to 6 inches deep or greater, may also inhibit gas exchange.
Fertilization: Trees require certain nutrients (essential elements) to function and grow. Urban
landscape trees may be growing in soils that do not contain sufficient available nutrients for
satisfactory growth and development. In certain situations, it may be necessary to fertilize to
improve plant vigor. Fertilizing a tree can improve growth; however, if fertilizer is not applied
wisely, it may not benefit the tree at all and may even adversely affect the tree. Mature trees
making satisfactory growth may not require fertilization. When considering supplemental fertilizer,
it is important to consider nutrients deficiencies and how and when to amend the deficiencies.
Soil conditions, especially pH and organic matter content, vary greatly, making the proper
selection and use of fertilizer a somewhat complex process. To that end, it is recommended that
the soil be tested for nutrient content. A soil testing laboratory and can give advice on application
rates, timing, and the best blend of fertilizer for each tree and other landscape plants on site.
Mature trees have expansive root systems that extend from 2 to 3 times the size of the leaf
canopy. A major portion of actively growing roots is located outside the tree's drip line.
Understanding the actual size and extent of a tree's root system before applying fertilizer is
paramount to determine quantity, type and rate at which to best apply fertilizer. Always follow
manufacturer recommendations for use and application.
Community Development Department
P"jNWNgFUl p ig s ft@pkgble or necessary to remove dead, diseased, or insect -infested
tUPERTINO branches a d t iOffle tree structure, enhance vigor, or maintain safety. Because each cut has
the potentia o c e the growth of (or cause damage to) a tree, no branch should be removed
Case # without r�s2WIQe��inq foliage from a tree has two distinct effects on growth: (1) it reduces
photos�01hm9s:9 N9rxder(f2) it may reduce overall growth. Pruning should always be performed
sparingly. Caution must be taken not to over -prune as a tree may not be able to gather and
Approva I BRi&bQr6W826I4 s%R if ht to survive. Pruning mature trees may require special equipment, training,
Approva I Dartd exp9d5QffW Arborists are equipped to provide a variety of services to assist in performing
the ' b s fely and reducing risk of personal injury and property damage (See also Addendum A -
Signature A,��u ,.,r,_U1 L I I ._..._:.-- Stall ---
Case Manager
Removal: There are circumstances when removal is necessary. An arborist can help decide
whether or not a tree should be removed. Professionally trained arborists have the skills and
equipment to safely and efficiently remove trees. Removal is recommended when a tree: (1) is
dead, dying, or considered irreparably hazardous; (2) is causing an obstruction or is crowding and
causing harm to other trees and the situation is impossible to correct through pruning; (3) is to be
replaced by a more suitable specimen, and; (4) should be removed to allow for construction.
Pruning or removing trees, especially large trees, can be dangerous work. It should be performed
only by those trained and equipped to work safely in trees.
Community Development Department
TF4Ffldfml�kMVi0QNMPM%o
CUPERTINO
APPROVED
Case# ThaTrRUEWs and conditions apply to all oral and written reports and correspondence
pe&SOM6000NOtations, inspections and activities of HMH.
Approval Body, Di gtg�d StgfFany report or other correspondence is limited to the trees and conditions
Approva I Date i' Iv mentioned in those reports and correspondence. HMH assumes no liability
Signature EIOWatuhe failure of trees or parts of trees, either inspected or otherwise. HMH assumes no
resKsn a , o report on trie condition of any tree or landscape feature not specifically
requested by the named client.
2. No tree described in this report was climbed, unless otherwise stated. HMH does not take
responsibility for any defects, which could have only been discovered by climbing. A full
root collar inspection, consisting of excavating the soil around the tree to uncover the root
collar and major buttress roots was not performed unless otherwise stated. HMH does
not take responsibility for any root defects, which could only have been discovered by
such an inspection.
3. HMH shall not be required to provide further documentation, give testimony, be deposed,
or attend court by reason of this appraisal or report unless subsequent contractual
arrangements are made, including payment of additional fees for such services as
described by HMH or in the schedule of fees or contract.
4. HMH guarantees no warrantee, either expressed or implied, as to the suitability of the
information contained in the reports for any reason. It is the responsibility of the client to
determine applicability to his/her case.
5. Any report and the values, observations and recommendations expressed therein
represent the professional opinion of HMH, and the fee for services is in no manner
contingent upon the reporting of a specified value nor upon any particular finding to be
reported.
6. Any photographs, diagrams, graphs, sketches or other graphic material included in any
report, being intended solely as visual aids, are not necessarily to scale and should not be
construed as engineering reports or surveys, unless otherwise noted in the report. Any
reproductions of graphic material or the work produced by other persons, is intended
solely for clarification and ease of reference. Inclusion of said information does not
constitute a representation by HMH as to the sufficiency or accuracy of that information.
7. Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept
some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate
all trees.
am
iL T
STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD
Mika
to's
450
3
421-
46 44 40 0 o
0 8� 041 t 490 0 047 390
48 040-
500 380
z, 510 03� 37
520
530 t, 270
540 I M
035 260 r
or
034
250"
550 0
31 0 032
560 240'
570 030 -
•023-
580 VAN
590 * - I I,,, lodl
.028 022
600
J
2 020
019
GAS. 0 0 0 -5
610 3 445
180
37.
CommuTi4Wk kl,,7tDTeRPWnIZUANTITY SUMMARY
Planning Division — Cupertino
CUPERTINO Tree Gc ARW y Species
Case #
S eT&J020-017
Quantity
% of Site
Ac'A' P1WW87*YA(P1on 1
2%
Approval Bod)
AC)ferEyPF ta, mstrong'
11
18%
Approva I Date
Cir6�tqWoum camphora
20
32%
Signature
�igusirum
nwa
2
16
3%
26%
PyrusCase Manager
calleryana
4
6%
Quercus suber
1
2%
Sequoia sempervirens
6
10%
Xylosma congestum
1
2%
ITotal Trees 62 1 100%1
10
TABLE 2 - TREE EVALUATION SUMMARY
Community Development DepartFjqRi red By: William Sowa ISA Certified Arborist WE-12270A
DBH MEASUREMENT HEIGHT: 54"
Planning Division — Cupertino Date of Evaluation: 11/01/2019
eaftNity for Preservk'R@R@MR bed on the following
ctg,-ffrees with good FFEItI2 cty�al stability that have the potential for longevity at the site.
Moderate - I rees in soap ii M09r ga and/or ex i i s structural defects that cannot be abated with treatment. Trees will require more intense management and will have a shorter
lifespan than those in the 'Good' category.
A rcF l; Rqd r. IfNmmtcmtV Staffcant structural defects that cannot be mitigated. Tree is expected to decline, regardless of treatment.
J4
05/27/20
5
I�PId`t
A heal% vi rous tree, reasonably free of disease, with good structure and form typical of the species.
A ` __ __ _ _ _ _„_ _ ,_ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _„ ___ __ & -_ = ig dieback, minor structural defects that could be corrected.
3
A tree with moderate vigo , moderate twig and small branch dieback, thinning of crown, poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that may that might be mitigated with care.
2
A tree in decline, epicormic growth, extensive dieback of medium to large branches, significant structural defects that cannot be abated.
1
A tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and or trunk, mostly epicormic growth; extensive structural defects that cannot be abated.
0
Tree is dead.
Abbreviations and Definitions
CD
Codominant branches
Forked branches nearly the same size in diameter, arising from a common junction an lacking a normal branch union.
CDB
Dieback in Crown
Condition where branches in the tree crown die from the tips toward the center.
CR
CR
Tree is bounded closely by one or more of the following: structure, tree, Etc.
D
Decline
Tree shows obvious signs of decline, which may be indicative of the presence of multiple biotic and abiotic disorders.
DBH
Diameter at Breast
Height
Measurement of tree diameter in inches. Measurement height varies by City and is noted above.
EG
Epicormic Growth
Watersprouting on trunk and main leaders. Typically indicative of tree stress.
EH
Exposed Heartwood
Exposure of the tree's heartwood is typically seen as an open wound that leaves a tree more susceptible to pathogens, disease or infection.
H
Hazardous
A tree that in it's current condition, presents a hazard.
HD
Headed
Poor pruning practice of cutting back branches. Often practiced under utility lines to limit tree height.
IB
Included Bark
Structural defect where bark is included between the branch attachment so the wood can't join. Such defect can have a higher probability of failure.
LC
Low crotch
Multiple central leaders originating below the DBH measurement site.
LN
Leaning Tree
Tree leaning, see notes for severity.
ML
Multiple Leaders
More than one upright primary stem
PT
Phototropism
Tree exhibits phototropic growth habits. Reduced trunk taper, misshapen trunk and canopy growth are examples of this growth habit.
S
Suckers
Shoot arising from the roots.
SD
Structural Defects
Naturally or secondary conditions including cavities, poor branch attachments, cracks, or decayed wood in any part of the tree that may contribute to
structural failure.
SE
Severe
Indicates the severity of the following term.
SL
Slight
Indicates the mildness of the following term.
SR
Surface Roots
Roots visible at finished grade.
ST
Stress
Environmental factor inhibiting regular tree growth. Includes drought, salty soils, nitrogen and other nutrient deficiencies in the soil.
WU
Weak Union
Weak union or fork in tree branching structure.
iff
TREE #
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
DBH
(I CHES)
CIRCUMF-
ERENCE
HEALTH
PRESERVATION
SUITABILITY
NOTES
ommunity Develo
ment Departm
rl
(INCHES)
Agga& I,vlslon
— Cupertino
UPERfINO
camphor
54PPR
Camphor Tree
VED
19.0
60
2
Poor
CDB
Ca 52 #
T
Acer rubrum
0f7Mstrong Red
3.0
9
4
Good
R
ApVl!�c
r uAr stro
br�irecTor %I
WcfC
Armstrong Red
Maple
3.0
9
4
Good
va
:
aff
App�ova
ate 05/2T/2
Armstrong Red
cer rub.—.,-,-,y
Maple
.0
9
4
Good
igpa tur
Acer rubrum ArhfM(Wfty
ger4rmstrong Red
5
3.0
9
4
Good
Maple
6
Acer rubrum Armstrong'
Armstrong Red
3.0
9
4
Good
Maple
7
Cinnamomum camphora
Camphor Tree
11.0
35
2
Poor
CDB, PS
8
Acer rubrum Armstrong'
Armstrong Red
3.0
9
4
Good
Maple
9
Ligustrum lucidum
Privet
7.0
22
2
Poor
CDB, PS
10
Quercus suber
Cork Oak
24.0
75
4
Good
11
Acer rubrum Armstrong'
Armstrong Red
3.0
9
4
Good
Maple
12
Ligustrum lucidum
Privet
20.0
63
4
Good
CD, CDB, MIL, PS
13
Acer rubrum Armstrong'
Armstrong Red
3.0
9
4
Good
Maple
14
Acer rubrum Armstrong'
Armstrong Red
3.0
9
4
Good
Maple
15
Acer rubrum Armstrong'
Armstrong Red
3.0
9
4
Good
Maple
16
Pinus canariensis
Canary Island Pine
26.0
82
3
Moderate
17
Acer rubrum Armstrong'
Armstrong Red
3.0
9
3
Moderate
Maple
12
TREE #
BOTANICAL NAME
ommunity Develo
COMMON NAME
ment Departm
DBH
(I CHES)
rl
CIRCUMF-
ERENCE
(INCHES)
HEALTH
PRESERVATION
SUITABILITY
NOTES
upetY1 o
Planning Division
Cinnamomum cas F'Qr
/- KK
— Cupertino
V&mphor Tree
11.0
35
2
Poor
Ca#
0111J�
7.0
22
2
Poor
Application Nurr
ber s
Ap?rQva
I ObcdIr 15rrE&? S
a ff Black Acacia
9.5
30
3
Moderate
Ap2rfva
if,na.tIa.r
22
?ate 05/27/20
mnamu,,,u,,, La,,,N„u,a
9.0
3.0
28
9
2
2
Poor
Poor
i.anlNlwl I ICC
Cinnamomum cSfi,ific%W
E"Camphor Tree
23
Cinnamomum camphora
Camphor Tree
12.0
38
2
Poor
24
Cinnamomum camphora
Camphor Tree
13.5
42
2
Poor
25
Cinnamomum camphora
Camphor Tree
12.0
38
2
Poor
26
Cinnamomum camphora
Camphor Tree
16.0
50
2
Poor
27
Cinnamomum camphora
Camphor Tree
12.0
38
2
Poor
28
Cinnamomum camphora
Camphor Tree
12.0
38
2
Poor
29
Cinnamomum camphora
Camphor Tree
11.5
36
2
Poor
30
Cinnamomum camphora
Camphor Tree
16.0
50
2
Poor
31
Cinnamomum camphora
Camphor Tree
13.5
42
2
Poor
32
Cinnamomum camphora
Camphor Tree
19.0
60
2
Poor
33
Cinnamomum camphora
Camphor Tree
11.5
36
2
Poor
34
Cinnamomum camphora
Camphor Tree
10.5
33
2
Poor
13
TREE #
BOTANICAL NAME
ommunity Develo
COMMON NAME
ment Departm
DBH
(I CHES)
rl
CIRCUMF-
ERENCE
(INCHES)
HEALTH
PRESERVATION
SUITABILITY
NOTES
uPeACYIAo
Planning Division
Cinnamomum ca ?n F'Qr
/- KK
— Cupertino
V&mphor Tree
11.0
35
2
Poor
Ca #
01..q
3.5
42
2
Poor
CD
Application Nurr
ber s
Ap va
I B&W. bjygr%V/ S
aC nary Island Pine
23.0
72
3
Moderate
Ap3�va
%
igLia.tUr
39
Do 05/27/20
��e LICHICU C11010
5.0
20.0
79
63
3
3
Moderate
Moderate
CR, PS
CR, PS
%'aiiaiy 101culu r-IllC
Pinus canari&A�7pa"
unary Island Pine
40
Pinus canariensis
Canary Island Pine
25.0
79
3
Moderate
CR, PS
41
Xylosma congestum
Shiny Xylosma
3.5
11
3
Moderate
CR, PS
42
Pyrus calleryana
Ornamental Pear
6.5
20
2
Poor
BLIGHT, CDB, LN, PS
43
Pyrus calleryana
Ornamental Pear
12.0
38
2
Poor
BLIGHT, CDB, LN, PS
44
Pyrus calleryana
Ornamental Pear
12.0
38
2
Poor
BLIGHT, CDB, LN, PS
45
Pyrus calleryana
Ornamental Pear
10.0
31
2
Poor
BLIGHT, CDB, LN, PS
46
Pinus canariensis
Canary Island Pine
22.0
69
3
Moderate
47
Pinus canariensis
Canary Island Pine
23.0
72
3
Moderate
CR
48
Pinus canariensis
Canary Island Pine
26.0
82
3
Moderate
CR
49
Pinus canariensis
Canary Island Pine
24.0
75
3
Moderate
CR
50
Pinus canariensis
Canary Island Pine
26.0
82
3
Moderate
CR
51
Pinus canariensis
Canary Island Pine
28.0
88
3
Moderate
CR
14
TREE #
BOTANICAL NAME
ommunity Develo
COMMON NAME
ment Departm
DBH
(I CHES)
rl
CIRCUMF-
ERENCE
(INCHES)
HEALTH
PRESERVATION
SUITABILITY
NOTES
UPEA'Yi O
Planning Division
Pinus canariel,PiPR
/1
— Cupertino
, ,Ury Island Pine
V
28.0
88
3
Moderate
CR
Ca
0.0
94
3
Moderate
CR
Application Nurr
ber s
Ap va
I $&W:sblq&T&S/ S
Sonary Island Pine
30.0
94
3
Moderate
CR
r va
ApJ�
igaa�r
56
05/27/20
�Saequo;a acNmcrvncna
.0
10.0
31
31
4
4
Good
Good
��a�L RcUVVUUU
Sequoia sepmEWFAgmEetoast
Redwood
57
Sequoia sepmervirens
Coast Redwood
10.0
31
4
Good
58
Sequoia sepmervirens
Coast Redwood
12.0
38
4
Good
59
Sequoia sepmervirens
Coast Redwood
13.0
41
4
Good
60
Sequoia sepmervirens
Coast Redwood
12.0
38
4
Good
61
Pinus canariensis
Canary Island Pine
26.0
82
3
Moderate
62
Pinus canariensis
Canary Island Pine
38.0
119
3
Moderate
CD, CDB, CR, PS
15
2, elk
N5
,T)s
r
" •ter ��'. `�. � S,�Y, � '_� j l j '°� =` .
71
i S4ftt„ �;; ���► s jr '� �� v
4�1 �
Community Development Department
Planning Division — Cupertino
CUPERTINO APPROVED
Case # TR-2020-017
Application Number(s)
App
App
Sign
19
p w a -I,.
H
#4 � •� yi,r Y s � '� fig, .QC1�' � ♦ ,.;r,.
\+. .✓� _ � ��' � �y���," ° ` � rya � '!
� � �'s r�° is ;� _ "�== <•�',
",'Jut
7 yRa+� e
0
fir-• t �"...
FFEL x
Am
a �'
- r
rr
F
Y
r x L{ J O 1
a`� s . -` i'- ,D ".gyp fir.^ - S .,�:.. y_,•�,
a (�
{
IA
�7a
r .y� • ,•t
Community Development Department
Planning Division — Cupertino
CUPERTINO APPROVED
Case # TR-2020-017
Application Number(s)
API
API
Sig
24
Community Development Department
Planning Division — Cupertino
CUPERTINO APPROVED
Case # TR-2020-017
Application Number(s)
App
App
Sign
25
0, g
i
k .
t
r
�1
4
Al
ii
Community Development Department
Planning Division — Cupertino
CUPERTINO APPROVED
Case # TR-2020-017
Application Number(s)
App
App
Sign
30
m
+Y
.Wt
r, z,
�
,a
s
x.
v„
'ti.
�
.may �.: � �
"Yc�. �
� �' �
�.
i� .4 � �Y
'-��ia s.
n3
� M
r
� � '��.,
�:� �� /.y� a
_
1 ti s�^.
�%,,�