The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCC 05-19-2020 Item No. 22 Plan Bay Area 2050 RHNA Study Session_Staff PresentationCity Council May 19, 2020 Plan Bay Area 2050 & Regional Housing Needs Allocation Study Session CC 05-19-2020 Item No. 22 PBA Background Lead Agencies: ●Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) ●Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) ●Formed in 1961 ●Bay Area’s Regional Planning Agency ●Focus: Housing, Transportation, Economic Development, Environment ●Plan Bay Area 2050 ●Regional Housing Needs Allocation Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) ●Created by State Legislature –1970 ●Bay Area’s Transportation Planning Agency ●Focus: Transportation, Financing, Coordination ●Plan Bay Area 2050 ABAG & MTC Relationship ●2008: SB 375 ●ABAG & MTC –1st combined regional land use and transportation long-range plan ●2013: 1st Plan Bay Area published ●2017: ABAG & MTC staff consolidation ●Present: ABAG & MTC share joint responsibility for PBA 2050 PBA 2050 Process ●Horizon Initiative: 2018 -2019 ●“Stress-test” future growth strategies and policies using Urban Sim 2.0 (parcel based model) ●Futures Final Report ●PBA 2050 Blueprint: In Progress ●Draft Blueprint -July 2020 ●Final Blueprint –December 2020 Growth Geographies Growth Geography Description Highlights Priority Development Areas (PDAs) Near public transportation; Prioritized for housing, jobs, & services Priority Production Areas (PPAs)Industrial districts Priority Conservation Areas (PCAs) Prioritized for open space conservation Note: Not a Growth Geography, but included in PBA 2050 Growth Geographies Cont. Growth Geography Description Transit-Rich Areas (TRAs) –Fixed Rail Within ½ mile of a regional rail station Transit-Rich Areas (TRAs) –Other* Within ½ mile of a bus line with peak period headway times of 15 minutes or less High Resource Areas (HRAs)* Places that offer best chance at economic advancement, high educational attainment, and good physical and mental health**; and Within ¼ mile of bus stop with peak period service headway times of between16-and 30-minutes * Only applies to jurisdictions that nominated less than 50% of PDA-eligible areas ** 2019 CA HCD Growth Strategies 1.Maintain & optimize existing infrastructure 2.Create healthy & safe streets 3.Enhance regional & local transit 4.Reduce risks from hazards 5.Reduce impact on the environment 6.Spur housing production & create inclusive communities 7.Protect, preserve, & produce more affordable housing 8.Improve economic mobility 9.Shift location of jobs Local Impact De Anza BlvdStevens Creek Blvd MillerN. Wolfe RdI-280 85 Bollinger Rd SUNNYVALE SAN JOSE SANTA CLARA LOS ALTOS -PDA (Near public transportation and prioritized for housing, jobs, & services) -TRA (½ mile of bus lines with peak period headways ≤ 15 mins.) -“Select” HRAs (HRAs with low residential density AND within ¼ mile of bus stop with peak period headways between 16-and 30-mins.) Regional Housing Needs Allocation Regional Housing Needs Determination(RHND) CA Dept. of Housing & Community Development Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Council of Governments (i.e. –ABAG) Local RHNA & Housing Element Update & Rezoning Local Jurisdictions (e.g. –Cupertino) RHNA Distribution Methodology – Total local RHNA Currently under consideration by HMC Primary Components for Methodology: Baseline Allocation Factor Adjustment Factor Weights RHNA Factor Impacts RHNA Distribution Methodology Other components/factors determine income allocation I.e. VLI, LI, Mod, above -Mod Based on many factors including: State law mandates (Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing) Potential Methodology Options Local Impact •2014-2022 RHNA: 1,064 units •Estimated Baseline Allocation: 4,413 units •Prospective Methodology Impacts to Baseline: Methodology Increase Total Units % Increase Code Red to Address Housing Needs +2,001 6,414 +45.3% Balanced Equity-Jobs- Transportation +1,494 5,907 +33.9% Housing/Jobs Crescent +1,178 5,591 +26.7% Code Red to Address Housing Need Balanced Equity-Jobs Transportation Housing/Jobs Crescent Jurisdiction Est. local RHNA Comparison to Cupertino Est. local RHNA Comparison to Cupertino Est. local RHNA Comparison to Cupertino Cupertino 6,414 5,907 5,691 Campbell 4,172 -2,242 4,296 -1,611 3,881 -1,810 Gilroy 2,657 -3,757 2,595 -3,312 2,525 -3,166 Los Altos 3,785 -2,629 3,218 -2,689 3,220 -2,471 Milpitas 5,288 -1,126 5,497 -410 5,007 -684 Morgan Hill 2,171 -4,243 2,289 -3,618 2,127 -3,564 Mountain View 9,962 +3,547 10,286 +4,379 9,286 +3,595 Palo Alto 8,312 +1,898 8,875 +2,968 8,006 +2,315 San Jose 69,610 +63,196 71,224 +65,317 71,701 +66,010 Santa Clara (City)11,237 +4,822 12,362 +6,455 10,913 +5,222 Saratoga 3,220 -3,194 2,859 -3,048 2,907 -2,784 Sunnyvale 14,908 +8,494 15,458 +9,551 13,998 +8,307 Total –12 cities 141,736 144,866 139,262 Comparison with Other Jurisdictions RHNA Process Timeline Dates (Tentative) Item Summer 2020 HCD 2023 –2031 RHND Fall 2020 Proposed RHNA Methodology Winter 2021 Draft RHNA Methodology Spring 2021 Final RHNA Methodology & Draft Allocations Summer 2021 RHNA Appeals End of 2021 Final Allocations January 2023 Housing Element ●Comments/Suggestions?