Loading...
January 4, 1988i�• 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 408)252-4505 SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM: AGENDA DATE: JANUARY 4. 1988 SUBJECT: APPLICATION NO: ASAC 51-7631 APPLICANT: TANDEM COMPUTER, INC. PROPERTY OWNER: TANDEM COMPUTER, INC. LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TANTAU AVENUE AND FORGE DRIVE PARCEL AREA: N/A ACRES Applicant requests a sign exception to allow and .off -site directional monument sign at the southeast corner of Tantau Avenue and. Forge Drive. s DISCUSSION: A. The Sign Ordinance does not allow permanent,�signs to be located off the site that they identify. Applicant proposes an 18 square foot'mohument sign as shown on Exhibits F-2 and A-2. The sign will identify a Tandem, building located„at 18922 Forge Drive (Building 216). The site on which the sign will be `,lo'cated (s also uiilized by Tandem. The enclosed staff exhibit shows the location of the.siign in reiatioh`f 118922 Forge Drive. B. Applicant's letter of justification states that. Building 216 is setback far from Tantau Avenue with limited visibility. Further, Forge Avenue in general is difficult to locate. ti C. ASAC had no concerns with the application and it was approved on the consent calendar. The Committee made findings that the sign will facilitate convenience in locating the site, consistent with the intent of the Sign Ordinance. The sign design, in addition, is consistent with the overall sign program for the rest of the Tandem "campus." RECOMMENDATION: The Architectural and Site Approval Committee recommends approval of Application ASAC 51,763.1 per the findings and conditions specified within Resolution 1347. ENCLOSURES: 1. Packet A of Application ASAC 51,763.1 2. ASAC Resolution No. 1347 3. Applicant's letter of justification 4. Staff Exhibit PREPARED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Randal R. Tsuda 'Robert S. Cowan Planner I Director of Planning cc517631(rdi ) orre AGENDA ITEM: SUBJECT: AGENDA DATE:JANUARY 4. 198R, APPLICATION NO: 4-U-86 APPLICANT: CUPERTINO CITY CENTER ASSOCIATES PROPERTY OWNER: CUPERTINO CITY CENTER ASSOCIATES LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD AND DE ANZA BOULEVARD Applicant requests approval of a final landscape plan for a previously approved mixed use complex. DISCUSSION: A. Proposed landscape plans for the office%park site and parking lot are shown on Exhibits L-1 and L-2, respectively. Conditions oUthe use permityequire,approval of a landscape plan for all public street frontages. The su,b'mitted p,,Ians do! not address frontage landscaping for the hotel site and for the De Anza Bouievard frontage near Cali Avenue (see Sheet A-9). ® Accordingly, ASAC has placed the following conditions on the project: 1. Condition 10 endorses Exhibit C-2 1 sti Revision as the approved landscape concept for the hotel frontage. The exhibit was previously approved during the use permit phase. 2. Condition 11 requires the De Anza/Cali frontage to match the treatment depicted on Exhibit L-2. B. The monolithic sidewalk shown around the park on Exhibit L-1 is incorrect. A condition requires a parkway sidewalk as shown on Exhibit L-3. C. The conceptual landscape plan included a landscape strip along the southern edge of the surface parking area. This has been deleted on the final plans. ASAC determined that sufficient landscaping exists on the adjacent properties to provide screening. RECOMMENDATION: Committee member s were very supportive of the application. The Committee's concerns have been addressed through conditions of approval. ASAC recommends approval of the final landscape plan per the findings and conditions specified within ASAC Resolution No. 1346. Enclosures: 1. Exhibits A-9, L-1, L-2, L-3, and C-2 1st Revision of Application 4-U-86 2. ASAC Resolution No. 1346. cc4u86(rd2) 0