Loading...
January 18, 1979ASAC-232 SU�11MARY MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF THE A.S.A.C., JANUARY 18, 1979, AND REFERRAL OF RECOMMENDED DECISIONS OF VARIOUS PUBLIC HEARINGS TO THE CITY COUNCIL. MEETING HELD IN ROOM 105 OF CITY FALL, CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA. l ' Meeting called to order at 7:35 PM by Chairman Bond with the Salute to the Flag. Lo ROLL CALL Present: Members - Irvine, Johnson, Ripplinger, Chairman Bond Absent: Member - Sallan Staff .Present - Kathryn McKenna Scott, Planning Intern Mark Caughey, Assistant Planner APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Regular Meeting - January 4, 1979 as submitted POSTPONEMENTS & CO`M11NICATIONS: None PUBLIC HEARINGS: 0 Continued Applications: 1. Application HC-51,467.1 - Peninsula Capital Group (Stonebridge) requesting approval of site, architecture, landscaping, lighting and signing for 36 single-family cluster lots located at the northwest corner of California Oak Way and Stevens Creek Boulevard. Presentations: Michael Painter, Landscape Architect Howard Brown, Peninsula Capital Group John Clowdsley, Architect Member Irvine disqualified himself from this application due to his involvement with the project. Staff reviewed Planning Commission resolutions pertinent to the application. The applicants presented a photograph of the proposed perimeter sound barrier. A slumpstone material with dark stained horizontal and vertical trim comprised the basic elements of the barrier. Staff discussed alternative architectural treatments available, including a stone veneer facade. The Committee generally favored the proposed slumpstone wall, provided that the applicant increase the setback variations and initiate perimeter landscaping modifications including mounding. The applicant suggested a dark brown finish for the slumpstone; it was determined that a rendering of such a color should be reviewed by the Committee. -1- ASAC-232 Minutes of January 18, 1979 A.S.A.C. Meeting (continued) Chairman Bond opened the hearing for public comments. Jack Williams, of California Oak Way, 'wished to ascertain his visual view of the project. Further, he questioned the manner in which antennas were to be controlled; Mr. Brown replied that ,the project would locate a central i antenna underground. Catharine Graham, a Westridge resident, wanted clarification as to the locations of driveways, open fencing, and the sound wall. Staff also indicated to Ms. Graham the architectural renderings. of housing units to be located nearest to the Westridge development. Bill Wunderlich, a Westridge resident, requested a description of the proposed Open fencing; in response, staff displayed a color rendering of the fence. It was determined by.the Committee that redwood/wire mesh open fencing was adequate for the California Oak Way frontage, while a brown steel stake/wire mesh fence was satisfactory for the northerly and westerly boundaries. Mr. Brown noted that there would be security gates at both entrances to the project site. ~loved by Member Johnson, with a second by Member Ripplinger, to approve Application"'HC-51,467.1 subject to conditions contained in Resolution No. 864. Motion carried 3-0 Ayes: Members -Johnson, Ripplinger, Chairman Bond Abstain: _Member Irvine Absent: Member Sallan 2. Application HC-51,075.411 - MillenniumiSystems Inc. requesting an exception to the established sign program for a light industrial.complex located at the southeast corner of Prunerid,ge Avenue and Tantau Avenue. Presentation: Jim McLey, Cal -Neon Sign Company Staff reviewed provisions of the existing sign program for the site, and explained the proposed exception to these provisions. Member Irvine asked Mr. McLey to specify reasons for justification of such an exception; lack of visibility was noted by the applicant. Chairman Bond indicated that the Committee would likely resist change, given the nature of the existing sign program. The applicant then requested a continuation of this application to discuss a revision of the entire sign program with all tenants of the site. -9-' ASAC-232 Minutes of January 18, 1979 A.S.A.C. Meeting (continued) Moved by Member Ripplinger, with a second by Member Irvine, to continue Application HC-51,075.411 to permit further study by the applicant. NEW BUSINESS: 3. Land Use/Community Character Element Staff member Caughey'was present to discuss the proposed General Plan Element with the Committee. Various issues were noted for reference to the Planning Commission. 4. The Committee discussed their function in.the City review process;.it was observed that perhaps their role was no longer crucial, with the possible exception of hearing appeals. Staff was directed to relate these impressions to .the Planning, -Director. It :was determined :.that :further input should be obtained from Member Sallan at the subsequent Architectural and Site Approval Committee meeting. The Committee adjourned at 10:15 PM to the next regular meeting of February 7, 1979 at 7:30 PM. ATTEST: /s/ Dorothy Cornelius Acting City Clerk W APPROVED: /s/ H. Elliott Bond H. Elliott Bond, Chairman Architectural and Site Approval Committee -3-