Loading...
October 25th, 1972M a. CITY OF CU?'„R=iO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 0 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino Telephone 9 252 -4505 c �� Rev,.: r Tjr rin MINUTES OF THE REGULAR T1EE'JI J 1,G OF HE A.,. HII �CTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL CO'2111TIC EE ON OCTOBER 25§ 1972 IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER.. CITY iIALLe CUPERTI O CALIFORNIA SALUTE TO THE FLAG; 5 Chairman. Sargent called the meeting to.'o-rder at 7a35 PM with the � Salute to the Flagg ROLL CAx1L Members present: Koenitzer s, McLaren s Sallan and Chairman Sargent B Members absent; Dressler r Staff present; Associate Planner Robezt Cowan Recording Secretary Ruth Cow 0 MI WUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING i, Approval_ of Architectural & Site Approval Meeting Minutes October 4th of October 4, 1.972 o r x Minutes approved as Member I•oenitzer noted that on pages 55 and 7 a sign for corrected Any Mountain, Ltd. read SKIING BACKPACK TENNIS and the proper wording was SKIING BACKPACKING TENNISa He also noted on, page 12, paragraph 7 ,the word `''resthome" should be changed to "duplexes"b Also on page 59 paragraph 5, the first ward of the second line Y should be "without" instead of "with0. On page 15, regarding roll call vote of sign ordi ance amendmentQ : the vote should be listed as 4--0-10 .Member Sallan wished the last line in paragraph 5, page .1:4, to read "percentage in terms of total community at a given time",„ - Moved b Me y tuber-k�oenitzer_9 seconded by Member Sallang: to approtie the Minutes of. October 4 1972 as correctedo Motion carried, 4--0 iiC-b5 Page 2 Ditz-Crane "Cali" develop- ment tree removal . r. Ditz con- tacted Aged and Dis- eased trees Letter to Planning Commission MINUTES Or OCTOBE` 25, 1972 H-CONTROL MEETING WRITTEN COMMILNICAT IONS 2. A copy of a letter addressed to Architectural and Site Committee from a Ms. No-:ra Bradlyn was distributed by Staff member Cowan. Chairman Sargent indicated the communication shoul"- have been address- ed to the Planning Commission rather than ASC as single family dwelling applications do not come before this committee. Member 'HcLaren said she had tried to contact *ir. Ditz to find out why the trees had been removed but he was out of town. She would have an answer when he returneri. She noted that the age of the trees and the condition of the trees sometimes made their removal necessary. Chairman Sargent suggested a minute order to forward this communi- cation to the Planning Comm-:-ission. IlAember Sallan so moved. Chair- man Sargent asked for this in the form of a motion. Percentage Member Sallar_ said she fa_1_t. it perhaps be well to require a certain replaced percentage of the trees on property t.o be replaced at the time of development if removal was necessary,. Ordinance w Staff member Cowan said the -_e is no tree ordinance as such at this anticipated- time in Cupertino, and that the Planning Director wants to get an ordinance before the Planning Commission within the next few months. Own laizdscap- In answer to _-_'CMOer SF I..l0:n's suggestion that E certain percentaga i.ng preferred be replaced, :-�_:,.ber Koenit.zar said he felt that once the orchards t had been plowed out, rather than haves the developer replace the ' trees, the ps_cperty owner shoul3 rave the rJ_ght to decide what type of tree was to be planted. I,re^.ber :'_cLaren agreE�d most homeowners t would prefer to have ovrrL landscaping. Planned Develop','- Chairman Sargent said this si.tuat or generally applied to single n:ent p2.rk areal, family tracts and H-Control received mostly light industrial and Planned evelop ::ent appl ico-_ior_s. he noted that most Planned Developments have coTmon Orr -as se?: aGide for open space and these areas can ana should be c:,r_trolle(i very closely. Those areas that ahave not been dovelope:7 as tract )erhaps a park or mini -park area could be dedicated in which these trces could be planted on a proportionate basis. Ordinance Purpose Staff mer_ber Cowan sa.ia planned would basically envision preserving erne _ and not get involved in orchard `Trees. tiembG S,?Ilan gi:e ti_or1Pd whether ASC would be included in oY .ir_a:xc.a :pis;._-ssior�s, Chairman S rgent said that H--Control wo,11:- J_i_;ce :o s, : the ot,?:i_m ance before it is submitted a'Lld z;iv<e i_t sphe hough':: the ordinance could start V 0 9 MINUTES OF OCTOBER 259 1017/2 H--CONTROL 111EETING 01R,U CO 111NICATL IONS 3. Member Sallan said she had had a telephone call from Ms, Bradlyn about the removal of traes, Staff member Cowan then said an. omission had been made on the Agenda in that Application H("'-51,305,3., Baywest Associates, heard. at the last meetin,, and continuedP had inadvertently been left 0 off, It should have shown or, the Agenda as a continued item, Member McLaren moved, seconded by Member Sallan, to continue Application 111C-51,305.1� AYES: Members Koenitz­xr, McLaren, Sallan and Chairman Sargent NOES : None ABSENT-. Member Dressler Motion carried, 4-0 KC-65 Page 3 HC-51LIW305,1 Baywest Associates continued PUBLIC HEARINGS Application HC­51 209,1 Any Mountain 9 Ltd. requesting HC-51 209,1 approval of modification of architecture for a commercial Yi Any Mountain, building located in the Rancho De Anza Shopping Center at Ltd 20603 Val -ley Green Drive, Continued frommeetingof October 4, 19720 Staff Member Cowan said this was a request to construct some kind . Staff report of chimney flue to allow a fireplace inside of Any Mountain, Ltd, shop. The staff had received a -revised plan whichhe then dis- tributed to H-Control members, The chimney was -to be a regular sheet metal flue with some kind of copper coated finish on it, He noted the applicant desired to construct a woodburning fire- place which would require a 51 high stack, A gas burning fire- ,place.could use a stack of approximately. 12-15" above roof. .Answering Member Sallan's,question about his having checked emissions from wood burning fireplaces as opposed to gas, Mr. Cowan replied he had not, The applicant, Mr. Eldon Hoffman 20603 Valley Green Drive i Location and Cupertino, in answer to Mfember McLaren's question., said the.flue description would be located 5' from the front wall on the inside of the shop... The chimney would be approxirtiately 5' in height of galvanized steel with copper sheathing and without skylight becauseof expense.. The hood on the flue would be of copper metals which, is shin*y when installed but will weather to a blue-green color., E HC-55 i; Page 4 j i ;ood casing t; r: Too narrow i No chimney i Fireplace not essential Plumbed for t gas Public Hear- ings closed Summary Application 11C-51, 20.1, Anv :,fountain Ltd. fireplace denied MINUTES OF OCTOBER 25, 19712 H-CONTROL MEETING In answer to Chairman Sargent's expressed opinion that a wood casing in keeping with the rest of the building would be more attractive than the metal, Mr. Hoffman said this had been discussed but his architect recommended the copper. Member McLaren expressed her concern about the size of the chimney, feeling a 5' high chimney would need a broader scope to tie in with the size of the building. Member Koenitzer reiterated his preference for the clean lines of the roof without a chimney. Member Sallan said she was not happy with the 5' chimney or with a woodburning fireplace. She did not feel the fireplace was essential for the functioning of the business. The applicant said the building was already plumbed for a gas burning fireplace, but they would like to use a woodburning flue so that a wood burning fire could be used once in a while. Chairman Sargent said this was a Public Hearing and asked for comments from the audience. There were none. Member Koenitzer moved and limber Sallan seconded that Public Hearings be closed. :Motion carried, 4-0 Chairman Sargent said it would appear there are some rather strong feelings against this particular application and for various given reasor_s, it would appear at this time that no solution acceptable to a majority of the committee had been ozfered. Member Koenitzer moved to deny the fireplace portion of Application flC-51,209.1. Seconded by ":ember Sall -an. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Members Koenitzer, McLaren, None "_fember Dressler motion carried, 4-0 Sallan, Chairman Sargent Chairman Sargent advised the applicant this particular application had been denied and advised him of his right to appeal to the City Council at their next meeting. EC-51,227,2 5. Application HC-51,2'7.2 - Measurex Corporation requesting :easurex Corp. approval of site, grading, architecture and landscaping for addition to existing building; located adjacent to and northerly of McClellan Road at the intersection of Bubb Road. s MINUTES OF OCTOBER 25s 1972 H-CONTROL MEETING HC--65 Page 5 Staff Member Cowan said this application was for permission to Staff report expand present facilities. He then shoured slides of original site plan, existing and future sites, and present area being proposed for expansion. There were slides showing elevations of previously approved and present elevation as.proposed by the application. Other slides showed the building theme and motif which will be continued. One slide showed an area where there is a.problem of storage of material outside the building but said the applicant had said this was being worked on. He also noted a condition of developmentin the West Valley Industrial Park states that any off-street parking must be sufficiently screened , from view. Mr. Cowan said that the City Master Plan called for Imperial Road to be continued to Bubb, but there was some question as to if or when this might have to be a cul-de-sac. In answer to a question by ,Chairman Sargent concerning ingress it Ingress and and.e ress from only the existing drivewa y; Mr. Cowan said the Egress City Engineering Department had reviewed site and felt there was adequate traffic flow.. Chairman Sargent indicated he felt this was very limited ingress and egress for the number of parking spaces, In answer .to a question by Member Sallan9 Mr. Cowan noted the �1 Screening.of condition for screening of off-street parking was covered, under parked cars the zoning. He said the ordinance was -not specifics dust said a 4. solid barrier should be installed. Member Sallan questioned whether present screening .is adequate. Mr. W. S. Burginp Plant Engineer of Measurex Corporation,. 10475 _ Landscaping Imperial Avenues Cupertino, California said his. company intends Intent - to develo an area which will be aesthetically pleasing and a P h credit to the community. Unfortunately they cannot consider the landscaping of the entire lS acres of property all at once. when the landscaping is accomclished; it is intended to create a park or campus -like atmosphere. He noted more space has been devoted g to open space than is required. He also corrected the application to show they intend to add only approximately 35,000 sq.. ft, in p 359000 sq. this application rather than the 99,000 sq. ft. shown on the application. He then explained the trash enclosure sho wn own with no gates. Due Trash to a miscalculation.of 2"s the gates had to be removed to allow,Enclosure the trash bin to be gotten into the enclosure. Correction of this is included on new plans.. Speaking of the storage on the Out.Side outside of the building, he noted this will be corrected by prom Storage viding'storage space inside of ,proposed expansion. MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 25, 1972 H-CONTROL MEETING Mr. Burgin explained that at this time they had no plans to extend Imperial Avenue. They had thought perhaps Measurex would be dividing property with other business concerns, but due to their success :-reasurex now planned to develop the entire site. To extend Imperial Avenue would cut a line through the property which would be most undesirable and would limit future develop- ment. Regarding the traffic circulation, Mr. Burgin noted they are limited by various zoning ordinances and acts of City Council in not being allowed an entrance or exit on McClellan Road or Bubb Road. He indicated the entrance on Imperial Avenue would be widened. SITE: lIember 1cLaren questioned it the parking ratio for 35,000 sq. ft. had been considered and if the trash enclosure would accemodate the new b-silding. .sir. 3urgin assured her the present tras:. facilities would accomodate both buildings and although it would necessitate rebuilding the trash enclo- sure, this would be done and the gates put on. Member Sa.'_lan auestioned what portion of the property would be built on with this expansion. 'Mr. Burgin said approximately 13 acres are still to be developed. Member l:cenitzer asked if there would be enough parking spaces for the projectev number of employees. lvir,, Burgin said there would be 110 parking spa., -es added at the back of t'_ze building on the northerly and wes--erly sides, He said the only parking riot screened entirely from the street would be the front spaces to be used by visitors and service: vehicles. ARCHITECTURE: Mr. Burgin said the two buildings now on site were of a deep striated concrete and the other e-:posed aggregate. They were using the exposed aggregate panel on the proposed addition. The windows would be enlarged fro: 42" to 54" decrpasing the concrete expanse by 2`, give more l-ght internally and give the building a lighter appearance fro:n the outside. The building would be of same design ar,„' materials, but have a more pleasing appearance. Member licLaren asked about the re --wood fascia used to screen the roof equ_pment. :ir. Burgin sa_d the mechanical screens would have asbestos pane..l..s with redwoo^ stringer and fascia, almost the same a.s *he present !­.iiding. '1-1:e only difference would be width and dep _:: of e'Taoed fascia varying slightly. HC-65 Page 6 Imperid.L Avenue not to be extended. Limited Entrance - Exits Parki- ratio trash enclosure 13 acres k undeve Parking • [windows enlarged Fascia m hce�-65 Page 7 MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 251, 1972- H-CO'_,',TROL MrETING LANDSCAPING. Mr. Burgin had. said earlier it was planned to ask for authorization to remove Liquid Amber trees and; replace them with Coast Redwood,- v She wondered if this would be a good spot for having berm of at. i least 3' in height as was a condition of March 1971 approval. Mr. Burgin said the berm is at least 4' high. He pointed out there Emergency were 3-concrete slabs with grass inbetween. Ile explained these Access were the result of City Councils Planning Commission and County Fire Department deciding an emergency access was necessary so the berm was cut off and slabs .laid, He said the berm would extend from McClellan Road to Imperial. Avenue and Olive Avenue tapering to non-existant at Imperial Avenue, Growth preferre4 %Ire Burgin explained iL was not intended to berm the length of to berming Imperial Avenue because they felt this would defeat their plans. for a parklike setting of property. Xeasurex•is willing to land- scape, but would prefer_ using growth, Resolution 1i Member McLaren noted condition of H-Control Resolution No,,43 No. 43 provided future landscaping would compensate ,in size of trees to those -planter earlier, Ifir. o Burgin agreed the trees would be I of comparable growth to existing ones, He said. their had planted .Coast Redwoods.which are now about 7' high and if the Liquid A Amber trees are removed p they will be replaced with Coast Redwoods of a size to match. present Pines. Grass circle In answer to a question regarding e " s 4 gar Ong the area marked existing grates has Pine Trees circle", Mre Burgin noted there were 4 Canary Island Pines growing y in that area, Contrast of Member Koenitzer said he liked the contrastbetween the Liquid'.Amber trees trees and -the darker Pinfi trees. Mr. Burgin answered that. Measurex { gardner did not like them because of leaves falling and gumming lawnmowers and because they did not grow large enough, Chairman Sargent asked if there were any comments or questions from the audience. There were none Public Hearing l Member McLaren moved, seconded by Member Koeni.tzere that Public closed Hearing be closed,. Motion carried, 4--0 IC-519227,2 Member McLaren recommended for approval to City Council. Application approved w/ HC-51g227,2 with standard H-Control conditions, Enclosures of condition, H-Control Resol,tion No. 43s Planning Commission Resolution No, 1107, and Exhibits A, B and C, with the stipulation that the trash enclosure as specified would be constructed, Seconded 'y Member Koenitzer, MINUTES OF THIS OCTOBER 25, 1972 H-CONTROL ::EE'IING AYES: r:emoers Koenitzer, McLaren, Sallan, Chairman Sargent NOES: None ABSENT: Member Dressler N:otioii passed, 4-0 Chairman Sargent advised the applicant that application had been approved and would be before the City Council on November 6, 1972. 6. Application HC-51,0 15.13 - Project Coordinators (Marie Callender Pies) requesting approval.of a sign plan for a commercial building located at 23750 Stevens Creek Boulevard in the Cupertino Crossroads Shopping Center. As applicant was not in audience, _e,-,ber Sallan moved, seconded by 'Mer.:ber Koenitzer, Lo place this application at the end of Agenda. N,_ction passed, 4-0 7. Application HC-51L,259.6 - Stanley 11ountiord (Raleigh Bicycles) requesting approval of a sign.i;lan for a comr:ercia'_ building 1ccated _J: the Portal Plaza Shopping Center at 19575 Stevens Creek Boulevard. Staff lLen..ber Cowan reported this s for a sign to be placed in an existing store space. The sign m°meets tec, -al requirements. He noted there are various types and colors of signs in the center, Showing slJ. es or the adjacent signs. He also showed a slide of the proposed sign. He said on. charige had been recommended by S!a`f and concurre(': }o by the applicant. This was to connect the two signs making it one sign rather than two. I•ir. Stanley 74o untford, Raleigh Bicycles representative, 19675 Stevens Creek Boulevard, C,_pe'�tin,), said the two signs were needed' because the Rale4 g'n Bicycle with Jolam was t 1e trade mark of this English concern and the deal--r franchise called Lor this sign to be shown. '--he second. sig-. had been intended to show the store's name "Stan's Cyclerv" b1.1t in order to keep the sign Simple had br erg changed to just "�,ic.ycles" to show nature of business. Member Koenitzer suggested a one -ine sign of RALEIGH-EHBLEM- BIC"CLES. He rid r,oL f.:[!!. tie ce'_cr object_ioL�able in view of adjacent signs, but found he sii-,il as proposed too busy textwise. Member Sallan agreed with this, and felt the one line sign would be a better approach. HC-55 Page S HC-51,015.1-- Marie Caller der Pies Place( end o: en( HC-511259.6 Raleig Bicycl-- Staff repor Reason for two signs Text too busy HC---6 5 :;INUTES OF OCTOBER 25, 1972 H-CONTROL MEETING page y H' r Co; f signs Mr. Mountford said he dia not know if this arrangement would be agreeable with the Raleigh people and what was really wanted was E a free standing pole sign. He agreed that one sign across the entire front would be more attractive, but did not have the required square footage of building, lie said the signs as presented were built by Ra"^igh and distributed to the dealers. Both signs would cost approximately $270 as against $800 for a custom-made sign, "Bicycle" sign: Chairman Sargent said he felt the second sign was redundant if repetitious � all it advertised was bicycles, 'Ie felt the naive of the store "Stan`s Cyclery".would he more appropriate. Mr. Mountford said it was the cost involved of having a sign custom-made, Member. Sallari aske4 if his business would be included on the shopping center sign, Mr. N�ountford said the sign would carry the nature of the business "bicycles", Member SaIlan. said she felt this in addition to the one sign on the shop would be adequate identi- fication. The committee all agreed to this faelingp Various suggestions were Trade as to more attractive signs and arrangements. There were no comments from the audience.. Public Hearin-1, Member McLaren moved, seconded by Mfember Sallan, that Public closed Hearings be closed. Motion. carried. }op SIC-51, 259 o 6 Memb€::' E.oe-nitzer moved to approve Application HCp51, 259 , 6 with approved w/ standard H-Control conditions, Exhib-it A and additional condition conditions that sign "BRicycl-es`,' be deleted and that -Raleigh. Bicycles sign be '1- centeredon store front.. Seconded by Member Sallan„ AYES. Members IZoenitzer, McLaren, Sallan, Sargent NOES., None ME ABSENT: Member Dressler 1--lotion carried 9 4 -0 MrI.lount f ord was told his aanP PP lication had been approved and would come before the City Council at their November' 6, 1972 meeting, HC-51,015,13 i 6, Application HC--51,01 .13 - Projects Coordinators (Marie Callender Pies' It was ascerta.ned that it was not required that the applicant be present After a brief discussion it was the unanimous agreement of the committee that the staff report was adequai:Q information ca which they could base their opinion ard make a' ruling® There were no comments from the audience. a I MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 25, 1972 H-CONTROL 11ETING Member Koenitzer moved, seconded by ,ember cLaren, to close Public Hearings. .lotion carried, 4-C aember Koenitzer movez' for approval of Application HC-51,015.13 with standar H- ConcrIA con6itions and 'Exhibits A and B. Plember Sallan seconded the--ation. Ay S: '_,Iem')ers Koenitzer, licLaren, Sallan anal Chairma:1-i Sargent TO S : None ABSENT: aember Dressler :icy=ion passe:, 4-0 Chairman Sa.cgant as:,,ed that .Sr. Cowan notify the applicant. of this decision. o AL pli `- �7C- _;1 8` 2. - Family=ionies - Lytle represented by =ettibone Signs requesting a;—proval of a sign plan for a comr_crc_ial _Located at the sout'hWest corner of Saratoga ur>nyv�3le =:d and is'_r,ain Lane. Applicant not 5elno present, 7'-_mbe�, YcLarea moved to continue Application �85 to the ne::t ravcaC.ing, Seconded by idember Koenitzer. AYES: 'Member. Koenitzer, 'cLaren, Sallan and Chairman Sargent NOTES None ABSENT: lember Drossier M-�tion carried, 4-0 At th:Ls port Mr. Lkurgin of ,12a-,urex Corporation returned to give added information regMans ans for perimeter landscaping. Depending on wi:.at they decide to ',ui_ld, thcy will either put in a permanent landscaping or a temp rary landscaping. In either event the 6900 sq. ft. will be landscaped sometime before spring. Mr. 3.Irgin was a.,kad to express t;) they Corporation the committee's concern regarding traffic circulation, UNFINISHED BUSINESS ,'orta' Iv:.-nue waS �.f��?iil discussed and it was llon's 11!`gerS OIL suggested that ut least ziic cover ;_ng shoul,' be painted. HC-65 Page 10 Public _ar- ings closed HC-51,015.13 approved HC-51., 285 , 2 Family :dome: Contin +: next m;z.:6jn ;leasuro future site landscapin€ Traffic circulatiol concern Don's Burg th EICr 6 5 Page 11 Sanuplper Restaurant Sign s { 1,P MINUTES OF THE OCTOBE 25, 1972 H-CONTROL MEETING Member Koenitzer asked if a sign. had been approved for the Sandpiper Restaurant as he had noticed one was being installed. Tiro Cowan said the Planning Director had given them a temporary permit for ' a temporary sign. with a list of conditions. He said applicant is fully aware sign was not approved. and might have to be removed..: It was noted the columns were being poured of cement and a Y'2000.00 i sign erected which is not the usual temporary sign. Chairman Sargent >> asked if this could be put on the Agenda for the next A'SC meeting. ; After a discussion Chairman Sar enL. asked Mr. , , g.- Cowan to .convey the I{ committee's feelings.o'f dissatisfaction with this situation. Sign ordinance Staff member Cowan said Mr. Sneppard was handling the signreview review N and had renuested a s ecial meetin A cnta`' e Wit' d f CtE Ig on :ee p g. v me. Ong ate o ai Wednesday evening, November 15,.was agreed, upon. Chairman Sargent i asked that specific areas of.concern be slated for discussion. Member Sallan asked Member McLaren to report on the special fj Steering Committee meetings a Member McLar_en said a letter was 4 being drawn up for Hm-Control'.s viewing. There had been all sorts f of discussion, and various recommendations presented and con- sidered, Among the Suggestions was the elimination of H.RCont-Co completely, having a larger Planning Co%emission, . and changing format of H-••Coni rol Commmittee. T embe:r L1cLaren said main problem IS , PlannedDeve_c3p ren{L applications, ng I She reported the Planning ;Director will write a report, hand it director°s j to Steering Cor, ittee and if they concur with it, it will then report go to City Council. Member Sayan said she felt ASC should also be included, Member �"-aren said _:r. Gatto had not been present at the last meeting.so ]r. Irwin had listed .recornmenda�-ions. lir. Irwinsaid since he had worked on the budget this year he was concerned by > 2ir, Gatto° iG s suggestion that an application be sent from Planning "Commission to 'd-Control and back to Piann-j_ng Commission9 then to City Council and 'pack to H-Control. The general concensus was that it would be too time consuirin- would work a hardship on developers and overload the staff. Chairman Sargent noted Cupertino is considered very forward look- ing in having an architectural and site control committee., This committee gives input at a level of something very much on every- onevs mind because of en-crironmen.4al impact. Elimination of this committee ,could be untLiinkable, ASC represents the interest of the community, has no ax to grind, and can voice opinions which as unwise as it might seem to experts .does represeat the citizen's viewpoint. Callinz in exnertc (-nril a i n_A I-114 n 4mri�r tilNliT S OF `, OC^OBZ'& 25, 1972 11-CO_','fI:OL IFEETI�TG IIC-65 1.Page 12 Member :•icLaren then gave a brief sum�;iary of how adjacent cities are organized to meet this situation. Member Koenitzer questioned �,.hethcr it had been discussed that Areas of responsibili', Planning Commission would work on a higher level of planning rather than in such detail. Chairman Sargent said on Planned Development applicatioT1s it must be laid out exactly before use permit is issued. .•Iember Koenit_er said he felt Planning Commis- sion should lay out general conditions and then have site control committee specify building placement. There was general agreement among committee members that this would be reasonable. Chairman Sargent summarized there see-ied to be a zealousness Summary ,of l �' 1 '' f?y u1U resannsibILI-f '-7 and a- `:�J_'A` �:: var:�us CJ 13l1t.LE_� [ ..•• LA� t ;;, �;'; rt11iYau'_;:}: any. They see7ed to feel if ASC were to get hold of these things they would be concerned about things too early. ':hey are concerned with lane use and __SC is concernee. With trees, 'she developers and sta':f overload are of concern. It would appear that the steering c�mTj_ttee has had various r ASC suggestions and taken them into ccr_sideration. Chairman Sargent reques_s requested that ASC receive a copy cf t:_e report before it ,cent � copy of rep;: to City Council. ti Member ,ScLaren passed out copies o an editorial. on environmental impact which she felt would be of interest to the committee members. Member Sallan questioned whether a iioneyside I?ealth Foods sl.gn in Vallco Shopping Center was in v.-�alation.I Member Sallan asked if there would be a response to :pis. Bradlyn's letter. Chairman Sargent reauestec'. lro Cowan to handle it and have it ready for his signature at the next meeting. 14ember NicLaren suggested a letter be sent from the Council. Chairman Sargent reported a workshop on controlling city popula- tion. ADJOURNMENT Moved by :-tember Sallan, seconded by i1fember Roenitzer to adjourn the meeting at 10:15 P_i, ATTEST: /s/ Wm. E. Ryder City Clerk rFotion carried, 4-0 APPROVED: /s/ L. Don Sargent Chairman Sign violat' Letter to ris . Br&n