Loading...
CC 12-09-65L. C , 1 ath ai atoa^.--Sunn vale Road, Cupertino, Call-fornia, 9512'� C I TY OF CU PERTI NO California MINUr'ES OF THE ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL, 12/9/65 TIME: 8:00 P.M. PLACE. Cupertino School Administration Office 10301 Vista Drive, Cupertino, California, 95O1LI I SALUTE TO THE FLAG 1I ROL:� CALL Councilmen present: Fitzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster Councilman absent: Finch Planning Comm. present,. Frolich, Horgan, Traeumer, Hirshon Planning Comm. absent: Johnson Staff present: City Manager, Phil Storm City Attorney, Sam Anderson Dir. of Pub. Works, Frank Finney City Clerk, Larry Martin Dir. of Planning, Adde .Laurin Recording Secretary, Lois Inwards III WORK ORDER TO HOOD CORP, - Reconstruct Stevens Creek Gallery, $18,000.00. The City Manager recommended that. the City Council instruct; the staff to outline a Work Order of the qualifications. 0 The Director of Public Works stated one or two of the problems cannot be accurately estimated at this time. The Hood estimate is by far the lowest; one other was for $5C,OOO. Their equipment is already in the area, which helm keep the cost down. Councilman Stokes asked for comments on lab tests for pollution. The City Manager said he has investigated thoroughly and we are not getting any pollution here, acccrding to the tests that have been taken. We have had weekly samples taken and almost without exception, it has been below the minimum. The Director of Public Works said the job would be completed and operable for about $18,000. We can clean up the site later with our own work force or we can hire another contractor. Regarding pollution. the Director said that if a problem should arise, probably a minor.additiona-'. amount of fluoride would take care of ice. -1- Moved by Councilman Noel, seconded. by Councilman Fitzgerald, that we authorize the City Manager to award the bid to Hood Corporation for $18,000; the City Manager to be in- structed to prepare a Work Orde_­ for the construction of Stevens Creek Gallery; the Director of Public Works to be :instructed to supervise. AYES6 Councilmen Fitzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster NAYS: None ABSENT: Councilman Finch Motion carried, 4-0 Councilman Stokes wanted it shown in the record that the Council was told that this is the total cost of this project. IV CHANGE ORDERS FOR CITY HALL Councilman Stokes stated that deleted items are of a minor nature; things that they felt were not necessary and would not detract from the looks of the building, He said they are awaiting additional changes from the architect. Moved by Councilman Stokes, seconded by Councilman Fitzgerald, that the Change Order be accepted reducing the contract price by $9,542.00; and that the City Manager be authorized to sign the contract. AYES: Councilmen Fitzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster NAYS: None ABSENT: Councilman Finch Motion carried, 4-0 V VALLEY TITLE COMPANY (Page Properties), application 8-U-65; for a Use Permit fir a 60-acre, one -family cluster develop- ment within a PC-H zone, east side of Mary Avenue, north of Stevens Creek Blvd, Approved by Planning Commission Resolution No. 301. Appeal re conditions (continued from November-29, 1965). The Planning Director introduced the following items: 1. .Revised Proposed Resolution, submitted by the applicant on December 8, 1965; with comments by the Planning Director on the left pages (2B, 3B, etc.) 2. Second Draft to a Proposed Resolution by the Planning Director, with comments by h�.m on the left pages_ rl.lA and 2A; there had not been time to complete the comments belonging to the following pages.) 3. Copies of a Memo from the Planning Director to the City Manager, dated November 23, 1965. 4. Copies of a Memo from the City Attorney to the Mayor, dated December 1, 1965. < The Planning Director said that Mr. Mittelman, and he had ``'' worked together on the ;tee- r-saes - resoluti onk to eliminate unnecessary divergences in the Wording. There is, however, a basic disagreement. The applicant's proposal is essentially his version, though amended in certain respects. The Plann- ing Director's proposal is essentially the City's Cluster Ordinance, with non -applicable parts left out; also some -2- general requirements left out (perhaps more than advisable ), and w.ith,amendments to include conditions and variations in accordance with the'Planning Commissions Resolution No. 301. This disagreement cannot be reconciled; the City Council has to make a choice between these two basic concepts. :The Planning Director recapped his memo to the City Manager. The R-1, R-27H and R=3-H Ordinances are inflexible rules to fit the standard'tract developments, the R-24-H Ordinance has,a modification clause, but is essentially conventional. The PC -Hand Cluster.Ordinances are intended to be flexible, and ,on purpose more "'vague," The tool to implement them is the Development Plan, T.he'Planning Director felt, that the applicant's exhibits did not quite meet the requirements for a Development Plan. Mr..'Mittolman stated that he needs a Resolution, constituting a legal document, which can serve as a basis for formal committments he has to make to financial institutions, etc. He made the following comments: .1. The Planning Director's concept, in effect, changes the zoning from PC-H to Cluster. 2. He cited conflicts in the various ordinances which must be referred to. 3. Uncertainty is. created bythe withholding of approval of the exhibits. 4. He feels that the Resolution he has presented follows the form prescribed. He suggested they take his Resolution, paragraph by paragraph, and make changes - asthey go along.. : ,. 5. The definition of.Uses_in.the proposed Resolution is the foundation of,.the disagreement between the Planning Director and himself. Mayor Dem.pster observed that the Planning Director's Resolution reflects the Planning�Commission's Resolution which in its turn reflects the Cluster Ordinance. He asked if there are certain things here that the Planning Commis- sion or':the Planning Director cannot live with. He asked if.Exhibits B & C give enough.informatidn to work with. The Planning Director stated that..he feels problems will come up which•cannot.be anticipated at this time. Comm. Frolich said the City is just.as entitled to be assumed to be reasonable as the applicant is. Mr. Mittelman said it is .in the"City's power to approve or to disapprove the Development Plan. The City Manager asked if the lending institutions won't ask whether or not the City Council approved the Develop- ment Plans. Mr. Mittelman said they must prove to them that they could live .with the play4s, if they should have to take over' this development. IU.ae_6Pe� Comm. Frolich asked if the area around each cul de sac is going to be approved separately. Comm.. Traeumer said the Planning Commission's Resolutien'calls for a detailed Development Plan for each stage. -3- Mayor Dempster then conducted a review.of the applicant's proposed Resolution, paragraph by paragraph. Extensive discussion led to,agreement upon revisions and amendments (stated in Appendix "A" to these Minutes.) In addition, the following remarks were made: The Planning Director reviewed the sections of the local streets., and noted emerging agreements on his copy of Exhibit C. Mr. Mittelman said he would rather have these specifications on the Development Plan. The City Manager felt that under Item (6) (a) it should have the approval of the H-Control. He added that the applicant has said the landscaping plans will be prepared by a qualified landscape architect. Councilman Stokes was in favor of putting in the Resolution, under Item (6) that we should have the H-Control Check List .referring to types of trees. The Planning Director remarked that two-story buildings facing each other'across only 14 ft. are allowed by the R1 Ordinance, but that this seldom is constructed. The Cluster Ordinance requires 14 ft. between one-story build- ings, but 29 ft. between two-story buildings. The develop- ment now under construction has to have.a lower standard in some respects because of the higher density, but it is desirable that windows of two-story buildings do not face each other across 14 ft. Mr. Mittelman said there viill,be some one-story buildings which.they'are trying to work'into.the.'ends of the groups of buildings. The City Attorney asked Mr. Mittelman who he thought should have the financial burden of underground Public Utilities. Mr. Mittelman said it shoule.the burden, The City Attorney offered: "The Common Ar a will be developed in accordan6e with'a Schedule A." Mr. Mittelman said he.could not draw up a meaningful schedule at this time. The City Attorney asked when they plan to put in the common greens. Mr. Mittelman said that in the beginning of the development a lot of the amenities will be put in to help "sell" the buildings. At the middle stage of the project, buildings may get ahead of the Common Area. It was sug-- gested to add "Put in the common green within that sub- division map within one year after completion." It was brought out that the Exhibits will protect the standard of the development_, including types of buildings. Mr. Mittelman said he would have copies of additional Exhibits printed up for the City. The City Attorney offered a different version for the second paragraph of Section 3 of the applicant's proposed Resolution. It is the intention of the City Council, as far as possible, to set forth in this Resolution a complete set of standards and conditions for the subject development, VII ADJOURNMENT It was moved unanimously to adjourn the meeting at 12:35 A.M. APPROVED: Isl J. Robert Dempster ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk 8 -U-65 CITY OF C U PERTINO Cali.1'ornia Appendix "A" to the Mirutes of the Otty -"ouncil Meeting, 12/2/65 Re iloions to the Applicant's Proposed. ncsolu-Gion: ''''age l OIi Page 2 1. A. USES: "trike the last sentence and put in its place the following: "?t is the intention of the City Council to ue L fort), in this Reso-.ution a complete set of standards and conditions for subject development." 1, Bo ( fit) Add at the end of the paragraph: " r , .,and the minimum inner dimensions available for parking shall be 912" by 20' for each parking space," ,-'age 3 O". i1 Page 4 ,(5) Change the last part of the paragraph to: .:long the two major internal streets; or an a--terna,tive arrangement. agreed upon." (6) (,.: Arta at the ei,d of the Paragraph. ",.,,and the F--:,)nLro1 Committee," (6) b) ;hall read as follows: "Street trees shall') conforn.to the Tree Ordinance as to specie and sizek it (6) (e) Additional paragraph: The applicant shill be reoponsl.ble for completing site as shown on approved plot plan, and shall be required to pay for .required engineering, checking and -inspection fees prior to issuance of building permit," (8) Strike the following: ' >Ex-Lcpt in these cases set forth in the attached Exhibit B," '� 11) Beginning; on fifth Iine �! , re).d fol.lo�vs (except for storage, garage or utility :. pea doers or wind-)Tas ► closer than 14 ft. pet,nieen the closest points of the Subject do!`.C's and, or uiin-ic)wS. 'I'rc.ilSli.'.0,;1nt wa:'., or op,:.que ventilation grilles shall not be restricted by this condition," �3 C. Shall read. in its er..tirety : "Lot c Wj.nIh; Lots shall be at least twenty -foul- (24) fL, vaidF7; 'ex0ept i;ti�t.t there shall be -L^o tr-inimum width f--jc end. buildings row, or in other cases wh;;:re approved by the Planning, Commission as a part of the Development Plan." -.1- Appendix "A" to the Minutes of the City Council Meeting, �12 19 '6L...� Page 5 (13) First line. Strike "dotai-.ed Devel opr,ient Plan" and insert "Te taYI ive L%P.„ (d) Add at the end of the sentence: "..,, and showing lot area," (f) Additional paragraph: "A map shoving the proposed system of public and private streets including cross sections for all types of streets." (g) Additional paragraph: "Any approved changes in the Development Plan shall be incorporated in the Final Map." (14) Add at end of first paragraph: "This requirement shall not be the responsibility of the City, it (15) (a) Strike the last sentence: "There shall be no minimum Common Area requirement for any individual development stage," Page 6 (b) Shall read in its entirety: "Improvements of the Common Areas shall be completed by the developer, said improvements to be installed within one year after completion of the unit on that particular map, and shall be subject to bonding and other procedures in the same manner as required for street improvements by the Subdivision Ordinance." (c) Add the word "Planning" before the word "Commis- sion" on the second line. (c) (1) Strike out completely. (c) (2) Shall read in its entirety: "Deeded to an association of the homeowners for whose benefit the Common Areas are set aside." (c) (3) Strike the following from the end of the paragraph: "subject to approval by the City Council." (e) Add at the end of the paragraph: "...All Common Area shall be subject to the City's Weed Abatement Ordinance." (16) On the second line, delete "City Attorney" and insert "Planning Commission." Page 7 (20) Change the beginning of the second paragraph to: "In case construction cannot proceed at a reasonable pace, or in case of non-compliance,..." -2- Appen­.x "A" to th,:-.- Minut.of the City Council Meeti Page 8 b Shall read -',.n its entirety: "Com.mo-41 Aro-a! 0-,.'!r) or more 'Lots commonly o'wnc-d by the in the development. 0, 3. Strike t-he Asecond paragraphf,, If -UE; Insert• "The provisions of t1 Re.-golution shall constitute a %rar-ftation from the nrj- visions of any other Resolution, Ordinance, �,uie or regu Fltio to or in conflict here-Althe _Mdo provided that _ETh_e_Tu_ bdivis ion Ordinanc_­ 4,7 of the City of Cupe2 Tino shall be applied, except = the pro- visions f this Resolution ai-e to the cor.tvaryaam& sue,-,., shall be ermed exceptions to the Subdivision Ordinance." Altcc 10321 ~uth SaratogP.-s~vva1e Road Cupertino, Cal1.fom12., 95129 252-:¡505 CITY OF CUPBRTINO Cal1torn1a I'Iinu'1"æ OP 'l'HB AD.TOORJŒD MBJmlÐ or 'DIE CITY COONCIL, 12/9/65 PLACB: 8:00 P .11. Cupert1nO School Mad.n1stration ot1"1ce 10301 'ftata Drive, Cupert1nO, Call1"omla, 950l! TIIŒ: I II samrB '1'0 THE FLAG ROLL CAU. Councl~ present: P1tzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster Co\mcllllBn absent: Pinch Planning COIIIII. present: Prollch, Horg!in, Traeumer, H1rahon Planning COIDIII. absent: Johnson Staff prescnt1 City Manager, Ph1l Storm Clty Attorney, Sam Anderson D1r. of Pub. Works, Fran.lc Finney Clty Clerk, Larry Martin D1r. 01" Planning, Adde Laurin Recording Secretary, Lois Inwards III WORK ORDER TO HOOD CORP. - Recondtruct Stevens Creek Gallery, $18,000.00 The City Manager recommended that the City Co-.mc1l instruct the staff to outline a Work Order of the quali1"1catlons. The D1rector of Public Works stated one or two 01" the problema cannot be accurately estimated at this tlrne. The H:Iod estimate is by far the ll),.est; one other was for $50,000. Their equipment is already in the area, which helps keep the cost down. Councllman Stokes asked for cOClments on lab tests 1"01' pollution. Th., City Manager said he M9 investlgated thoroughly and we are not getting any pollution heN, a.ccording to the tests that have been taken. We have had weekly samples taken and ablost without exce?1;ior., it has been below the minimum. The Dlrector 01" Public Works sald the job would be completed and operable for about $18,000. We can clean up the slte later with our own work 1"orce or we can h1re another contractor. Regardlng pollution, the Dlrector sald that if a problem should a1'1.se, probably a mlnor additior.al a~unt of fluorlde woulj ta1<e care of it. -1- ~ I , ¡" l ~. .It..: . ,'/:.:. .._ Moved by Councll111an Noel, seocondeð. b1 C'.ouncllllJlln Fitzgerald, that lie authorize the City Jllaœger to awa1'l1 the bid to Hood Corporatlon ror $18,000; th6 Clty Manager to be In- str.¡cted to prepare a ~ork Orde:o tor the cOll8truction .,f Stevens Creek ~ler.,. the D1reGtor or l'UbU.c liorks to be 1D8tructed to euperv1se. CoUDCilmen P1tqN'ald. Hoel. Stokea. Dempster IIone CouDc11an P1nch Motion ca1"l'1ed. 4-0 Councl1man 8toketl _ted It shown 1n the record that the Councll _s told tbat this ls th." tota1 cost; ot th1s project. . A'!BS: NAYS: ABSIDft': IV CaJÐB ORDBRS lIOR CITf BALL CouncUaan Stoke. stated that deletlll! items are ot a I'!lno!' nature; things that they 1"elt wel".: not necessary and would not detmct 1'1'0lIl the looks of the !Ju11d1ngc He 881d they are awalting addj,tlonal changes troft; the arch1tect. Moved by Co~ncll111an Stokes, seconded b1 Councl1man Pitzgeralti, that the Chanse Order ba accepted reduclng the contract price by $9,942.00; and that the Clty Manager be authorized to sign the contract. AYES: N.\YS: JðSF:rl': Councllmen Pitzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster None Councllman Pinch Motion carried, 4-0 V VALLEY TITLE COMPANY (Poage Propertiee), applicat10n 8-u-é5, for a Use Permit for a 6o-acre, one-family cluster develo;;- ment within '1 PC-H zone, east side of Mary Avenue, north of Stevens Creek Blvd. Approved by Planning Commlsaion Resolution No. 301. Appeal re condltlons (continued from November 29, 19(5). The Plannlng Dlrector introduced the followlng items: Revised Proposed Resolution, submitted by the ~Rlicant on December 8, 1965; with comments by the Plariñfng Director on the.!!!! pages (2B. 3B, etc.) Second Dratt to a Proposed Resolutlon by the Planni!"@: Director. with comments by him on the left pages - - (l.lA and 2A; there had not been time tõëompletè the comments belonging to the following pages.) 3. Copies ot a Memo 1"rom the Planning Director to the City Manager. dated November 23. 1965. 1. 2. 4. Copies or a Memo trom the City Attorney to the May.,r, dated December 1, 1965. The Plannlng Director 88id that !'or. M1tt"!llman and he had worked t(>~ether on ·,.he two proposad reaolutlons to el1mi!".ate unnecessary dlvergen~es in the ~rdlng. There 1.s, however, a basic dlsagreement. The a¡>pl1cant's propo88l ls essentialJy his version, thoU8h amended in certain respects. The Plann- ing Director's propo881 is essentially the Clty'. ~¡uster Ordinance, wlth non-appllcable parts left out; also some -2- 'õ;..lY gene:&! requ1l"ea18ntl let~ out (perhaps more thall advisable), and .~th uendmeDts to include .::ondit1ons and variations In ae~oroance with the Planning Coar:I1sslon-'s Rceolut1or. Í'fO. 301. Th1~ d1BB6leement ca.~t be recorclled; the Clty Council has to aJce a choice between thez;e two baa1c concepts. '!'be pt.""" mrector recapped bis IIIeIIIO to the Clty Manager. '!'be B-1, B-2-H aiIII- B-3-80rd1nBDces are 1n1"1ex1ble rules to t'!t tire ..,.......:¡s':tií!aet ~o.-nta, the R-24-B Ordinance has a .od1tièan~1Ì c1auH~ but is euentW17 cOl1ventlonal. !be IC-B and CluSter C)rdt,....ce- are 1ntende4 to be fiexible, and OD ~ '_re ""que.. !be tool to Il1Pl_t tbelll 18 tire DrftloPimt P1an. 'file ~ Director telt, that the aP\'l1caftt'. IIZb1b1t8 cUd DOt quite ueet the requirements tor a De'lelo.-;nt ?lan. Mr. JI1ttelman stated tJBt he needs a Resolutlon, conatltuting a 11!ßÙ docUllellt. 1Ih1ch can sene as a basls tor 1"01'1181 co.-1ttllents he baa to .alee to fl1.ancial lnatltutlona, etc. He aade the tollo.ing co_nts: 1. The Plam1ngD1rector's concept, in o1"1"ect, changes t!W! zon1ng trom tC-B to Cluster. '2. Be :ited conf'l1cts 1n the various ordinances whlch :r.;St be reterred to. 3. ::'1Certa1nty ls created by the withholding 01" approval .::f :he exbib1t3. 4. ~ ~eels that the Resolution he ~~s presented follows ~he form prescribed. He suggested they take hls ::es:::¡t1on, paragraph by ¡uragral'h, and make changes as ~hey go along. 5. :-c,e .hf1n1tion 01" Uses 1n t!:e ¡r::>posed Resolution is ~:;e foundation of 1;he disag~er.:e~t between the Plannin,; :~~.tor and h1~self. HaF:" :"",pster observed that tt.e Flanning Director's Res.:~~lcn retlects the PlanrJ~g Cc~lssion's Resolution w~i:~ ~~ Its turn re1"lects the Cl~ster Ordinance. He asked if ~c..re are certaln thi!'.gs t.,.re t!-.at thc Plannlng Commis- sic!'. or the Planning Director 'IUU'>:~ live wlth. He asked if SX:~~lts B a: C give enough infermation to W01* with. The F:a:t..,1ng Director stated thi:t he t'ee'q problema will co~ ~I' ~r.ich cannot bê anticipated at thj~ tioe. Cocco ~~ltch sald tt~ City 1s ~~~t as en'ltled to be ass~~~~ ~o be reB30nable as the applicant is. Mr. ~~telman sald It ia in the City's po.er to approve or to ;iUapprove the Development Flan. The City Manager asked it the lending institutions won't ask "~ther or not the City Council apþroved the Develop- men~ Plans. Mr. M1ttelran &aid they must prove to them tha'c they could llve IIlth the plans, it they should have to ta¡¡~ over th1s development. ,;0..... Prolich ssked it the area around each cul de sac is going to b.! a~ved separately. Comm. Traeumer sald the Planning Coœmi8810n's Resolution calls tor a deta1led Develo~nt Plan tor each stage. -3- .,,~i.,.~, "..'.AF.;..:i."; ........".._---" ._. ...-~,_.~ -- f' Mar-r DemPSter tbeL conducted a revlew ot the applicant's ~;x:sed Resoll:t1oD. paragraph by paragraph. EKtena1ve d1s:-.;ss1on led to ~¥UlÐnt upon revidona and amene2l1el1t11 (S2~ed in A~k fl." to these Minutes.) In add1tion, t!>e !:)l1ow1ng A - - ~ vere .-de: '1 '8 PlamI1ng ,J)1ftC,' ~reV1e, "reV1ewed the sectlona or the local aveetll, and ~,~ 8Sl'IIRI1\ta on bi. cow or Brh1blt C. 111". 1Iftt,--- D1d be -'A ratber have tlwse apeeU'1cat1Cmll'" ~,~lo)lMllt Plan. !'be C1t7 ~tlat UIIIer It.. (6) (a) it abould !aft the a~'61ør . 1I-CÞutl'01. Be id4eð that tbl appUe4I1t baS ...._. 1aJII!aca1dllC p1aDa wiU be prepared ~ a qual1f1ed ~.4 .~ pe arcb1tect. CouDcUan Sto" .. 1ft !aWl' ot pattiDS In the RellOlut1on, uø:Jer Itftl (6~,:::t; ,we ahould baft the B-Cont;rol CheCk Uat ref'el'l"1ng to or trees. ~ ?lanning D!r6ctoI' NSrked tlat t1lO-ato17 bu1ld1np facing each other acrosa 01117 III ft. are a110wed by the 111 Ordinance, bIß 1:bat t.his ae~ ls COll8t.rucud. The C1,..ter ord1JlanCe requJ.res 14 ft. between one-.tor:r bul1d- 1n¡;s, but 29 tt. between tm-atol7 bulld1J\6ti. The develop- œe::~ :xiV under conatructlon las to lave ól lower standard 1r. !-::18 respects becaUSe of the higher denalty, but it is ::esirable that w1nISOW8 of two-stor:r bu11dlnga do now ta:e each other acro.. 111 ft. Mr. IUtte~ aald there v1:: '::e some one-at.or:r buUd1np which they are try1n« to vc:-;': ~~to the ends ot the groupe ot bullcUnga. Tœ :1~ Attom87 asked IIr. IUttellllBn who he thcught should ha..-e ~~e f1nancial burden ot underground Publ1c Ut1l1tieo. 1':. )I~~telman sald It should be the developer's burden. The :l~Y AttOrneJ' off'ered: "The COIIIIIIOn Area will be de'e::~~ in accordaDce wlth a Schedule A." Mr. Mittel~ sa~:: :.e could not draw up a mean1ngf'Ul schedule at thiS time. The :-:'~y Attorne)' ..ked when they plan to pat in the cOllllOn gre-e::.s. Mr. IUtteben said that in the beg1nn1ng ot the deõ~::~ent a lot of' the .-entties .111 be put in to help ".e::· the bu1lcUngø. At the mid'Ue staae ot the project, b¡;.1:~1!'.gs 111&7 fet ~d ot the COIIIIIIOn Area. It.... .ug-- ges~~ to add Put In the cOIIIIIIOn green within tlat sub- d1V1s~=n map within one year atter co~etlon.~ It ><u broug:1t o,¡t. tbat the Exhibits wl1l prot')ct the st&..-.2:d of the d.Y.1op¡ent, including type. ot bul1dings. Mr. )C.~telman sald he 1IOuld bave copies of addlt10nal Ex!'~:~~s printed up f'or the C1ty. The ~1~7 A~torÐe7 of'f'.red a dlfterent veralon tor the se,:::;,:rl IBragrapb of' Sectlon 3 of the applicant's proposed Res::!~~icn. It 15 the intention ot the C1ty Council, as f'ar as posB1ble, to s,,~ t'orth in 1:hU øeao1utlon a complete set ot standards and ~.:!J11tiona f'or the subject developaent. 'rD AD.Jœ!DIŒNT It as IIIOVed 111"'"..4_17 to adjoum the _ttng at 12:35 A.M. API'IIOVBD : ........-.... : /a' J. IIoberot Dempster ..,or ;),-, . -""\->"~ '-r~~~.;.i¡t4..~:.;; C1 CJ' c~ertr: -'1- ...~;~.~d~~·:~:,;:-;; , ".~~j_'_,.._ ;.J ...... ~;,J;';'f~~"'vw, ..-.;: .í',~ ~. ,~.-.u. 8-u-65 CITY 0' CUPBRTINO Cal1fom1a !PÐend1Jt -,- to tbe JI1D&tell ot the City Council Ileet1M. 12/9/65 P.ev1ø10DII to the ApPUcant'. Proposed 1ie801øtlon: eap 1 Pap 2 Pl:öe3 ~ell CI[ 1. ,. vaal 8tr1ke tbe laat .eatfoftce and put in its place tile to1101dD1: -It 18 t~ intention ot tbe Cit7 Council to ..t tort" in this Beaolution a cOCllPlete .et _'f at-.. ..... aat colllUtlons tor subject develop:aent." 1. B. C') Add at the end of tile paragraph: -....and the 1IIi"'__ 1nDer 41Mn111oM aft1lab1e tor pa.r:C:1ng shall be 9'2- b7 20' tor _cb park1ns space." 01 !5) Chanse the lut part of the pa1'P.graph to: . .. . .clons the 1:110 -.101' internal atloeets ¡ or an :1ltet'nl'ltl"e arriñgemer.t agreed upon." (6) (;;) A4d at the el~r! at tÞe pan:g:-a?h: n... .arA ~~e H-~vntrol Co~tt~e.n (5) (b) Shall read as rollowa: ~~n~OrD to the Tree Ord1nance aa ~he l~:at1oO) to be dete:'!ll1ned by "Street tr~e!l to specIe nnd the City." sh311 s1ze; (6) (e) Aðdltlonal paragraph: "The a,pllcant sÞ~11 be responatb1e for completing alte as ahown on appr"'·rp.~ plot plan, an~ IIMU te re:t~lred to pay for rc"ulrc:l er.glneer1nc. checking and 1nspect1on tees prior to Issuance ot building perm1t.~ (8) Zt~ke the follovlng: "Ex~~pt In these casea set forth in the attached Blrh1blt 3." S1l) 3eginr.lng on fltth lIce. re~d as to'10ws: 'exce~t for sto~~~. gar36e or utl11ty nrea joù~s or winJ:>~'ls) clos.r than 14 Ct. bet..een the closest poInts of t~e subject dCK'rs aId/or w1:-.10vs. 'f're.ùSl;.;c.mt ...3:_:5 or opaque "entl1at1on gr1lles st..!ll r.ot be restricted ty t~~. condItIon." (12) Sh311 rea4 10) 1ts ~~tlrety: "I~t Wld~h: Lota shall be at least twenty-to'.!!" (24) t~. w1è~eT.cept ".~',<l'; there ahall be no u:ln!cr..uD "'ldth fer end bu1l11:1&s ~:-: a row, or ln other cnses wh~::-e approved by the Planning Cm.llllls!llon as a part ot the Development Plan." -1- ~iX P&ge5 p.~ge 6 P3ge 7 "I." to the R1m1tea of the Clt¡ CoU!\cll MeetlI'g, 12/9íó5 (13) Firat line. Strike "dC't'llled Development Plan" a.1d Insert n'l'ent.;¡t;iye JIiI1¡¡." (d) Add at t;be end of the sentence: ...., and sho"ing lot area." (t) Add1~1CJØ111JIBftINpln "A _P aœ.tftB the proposed S18U. otPi'hJ.f4 aid pr1ftte streets 1Dclwh1g cro.. sections tor all I...~ of street'.I.· (g) A4dUloøa' JlU'8&l"&ph: "ArJ7 approYed cteDgea in the Develo~t P1aD aba11 be inCorporated in the P1nal )laP. (14) Add at ea4 ot t1ret paragraphs w'ftWI requ1u.nt shan not be the respoaalbl11tJ' ot the City." (15) (a) Strike the last sentence: "There shall be no cdnimum ~D Area r.,qulrem.mt for BI1J' ind1 vidual development st;age." (b) Shan read in its entirety: "Improvements of the Common Areas &ha11 be completed by the developer, said improvements to be 1nsta11ed within one year after completion of the unit on that particular map, and si1all be sub.fec. t to bonding and other procedures in the same manne~ as req~ired for street improvements ~y the 3u~ivlsion Ordinance." (c) Add tt,e word "Planning" before the word "COr.1mls- sion" on the second line. (c) (1) Strike out completely. (c) (2) Sha11 read in its entirety: "::~~ded to an ~ssociat1on of the homeowners for whose ~neflt ~~e Common Areas are set aside." (c) (3) St!'1ke the followll1g from the end of the ;aragraph: "~~b.fect to app~'val by t~e Clt7 Coun~11." (e) \dd at the end of thE' paragraph: ".. .!,~l COr:1."'Cn Area shall be subject t~ the City's We~ Abatement Ordinance. " (16) On the second 11n~, delete "Cit7 Attê.~~Y" and insert .. Plan.ung Commissio!1." (20) Change the beginning of the second ¡;arag.ap~. to: "In case construction cannot proceed at a reasonable pace, or in case of non-compliance...... -2- AppenIl1Jt -,,- to the JUøateS or the City Councll ICeet1Dg. 12/9/65 l'Bge 8 b. Sha11 r...s 10 ~ II entirety: "Co-_4 Area: One or 80re lots~' ...11'''wned bJ the p¡oOpe~ owners in the deve1c,palDt.- 3. StzrSØ t:be ..ant' ¡aresraph: -'!be l'6"'..r.1alona..... ~ ~.. ..-ert: -'1'be ....vdaloM ot th1a ØeeolutSGD - ''J ooaH1wte . var1atsG1t ~ the pro- Y:t~ or.... ......II-olut1oD. QrIM........ rule or repJatd_ ~.. to or 111 CODf'11c~ b..uwJ.th; JII'OY1ð.4 tIa&"- ~~100' O1"tt-- ", ot the C1tJ' or CUJU'ÙIID ........ lie .pp'..... except wIb..n. the pro- ..,,-10- or .... Rna1at1clD are to the .....&'U'J' and INCh ....11 be t- r .....ptlGal to the SubcU91810n Ord1nanCe.- -3-