CC Resolution No. 9268
RESOLUTION NO. 9268
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CUPERTINO AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY AND
SANTA CLARA COUNTY REGARDING BOOKING FEES
WHEREAS, there has been presented to the City Council a proposed agreement
between the cities of Santa Clara County and Santa Clara County regarding booking fees;
and
WHEREAS, the terms, conditions and provisions of the agreement have been
reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and the City Manager.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Cupertino hereby approves the aforementioned agreement and authorizes the City
Manager and the City Clerk to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Cupertino,
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this J.1..th... day of January , 1995 by the following vote:
YQ1!: Members Qf~ ~ Council
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Bautista, Burnett, Sorensen, Dean
None
Koppel
None
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
/s/ Kim Marie Smith
City Clerk
resolutilres9268.doc
/s/ Wally Dean
Mayor, City of Cupertino
KICHIBI'1' A
AGRBSKBNT BETWEEN Tff& CITIES OF &AN'.rA ClARA COUNTY AllD
SANTA CLARA COUNTY f\~GI>.RIHNG BOOKING FEES
~VXS!D ÐSCKMDBR 5, 1996
1- Ii tla~ fee booking IX'YJllent tor each billable jurisdiction
in the COunty 1:0 be in e£f~t frolD FY 1995 (July I, 1994)
throu9h Py 1997 (June 30. 1991).
2. In order to simplity ~he process ~he iGGue of
r6~r04c:tivity conceptually agreed to during FY 1994 will
be waived and the new proceGG will be effective July·'i,
1994 as ~e8cribod above.
"
3. The flat fee payment froll! each jurisdiction \tOuld be set
to capture $4.5 mUlotl to reiJllbuue booldnq costs in the':.
Deþart.D1ent of Correction and oth~r supporting ac¡encies in
each of the ~bove mentioned three years. .8xhibit B
identifies the charge that would be aUoce.ted to e«eh
.j.uri8diccion on an «nnual basiS. I
... The paJlllent woul<1 be due on January 1 of eAch of tbe three
fiscal years identified (FT 1995, PY 1996 end PY 1997).
.
5. For every percentage reduction in che auilbez: of booJd.D( S
by cities from the Ͽe yeu f'T 1993/1994 measured on
June 30, 1997, the County will reduce the $4,500,000 in
bas. Y~4r billflble. booking charges by a. like percent¡age, .'
~ to ð maJtiJDum of 1.5' for the succeeding three years;.
The base year Rulllber of bookings is set at 3Z,SOO. 'rt the
contrary oc<:UrG, the percentage increase frosn the PY
~993/1994 base year would be added ~o ~he $4,500,000.
6. Tile booking charge will be adjusted by .'11 annual inflation
factor based on tbe San F:r«nci.eo/Oðkland Conll'U1ller Price
Xnd.¥ or increAses in actual county personnel costs
whicHever is lower and vill no1: exceOO U per year (0
maximum of 1.2' over che life of tbe agreement). The
infl-t.tiol1 factor will be calculated on the b~u ~ char<¡e
.fter it·has been adjusted for the reduction in the number
of bOokings as described above.
.
7. The recalculated DSle ye6r billable ÞooJt1ng charges will
be the b~sia for. che County boo~1nq feea for fiscal yeora;
1998 through 2000 (July 1, 1997 through June 30, 2000)
8. Nothing ill this aqrccmønt frolR the eftective date of July
1, 1994 precludes the adoption of alt~rnativ. bookin9 tee.
that reflect futur.. c:hangeG in the booking process due to
technolcx¡ical imnrovelllent5. ørocedural chang-eq or changes
in law.
·~Ml"AK'3Vl't VI' rKVi'V;)~1J UVV"'IN~ "£Ie
WITH CALCUlATION BASE.D ON THE EXISTING CALCULATION
COMPONENT __
M.aùo. Jai! 8oo1in& FIKility
aJRRENT PROPOSED
COMPONF.NT COMPONENT
=.s.:~-=--= cn.c:-r
.. .....===---
$62.78 $62.78
CoII~ CeJnet lOf WOID"D
$3333
S1J.~
AdmJøistladve Boontg Activity
$1.46
$1,46
o-ifntioA
$12.DO
5.'1.40
~0vW.cad
St2.71
S12.71
CQuty Ovedle:ld
S8.6)
Sll,63
Mediad SÞiI
<MIhead
$14.Ð7
S2.31
$14.01
S231
Mellbl HnIIkSbfI
()vedrad
SOAO
$0.07
SQ.40
$0.01
Owas Raeov~'G ~ Scaff
~
$9.43
$U5
S9.4)
$I.SS
-
.- ~.
..
TOTAL
$179.14
St38.46
~
EXHIBIT: C
DlfFF.R~
$0.00
$10.28
$0.00
S20.4O
SOJ1O
$OJJO
$0.00
$0.00
50.00 .
$0.00
SO.OO
$0.00
$40.61
. '
. BOOKING SUMMARY ,BY JURISDK'TION t:XIilRlTB
FY 1993 fY 1994 FYlm f'Y 1995 PROPOSEO
.nnuSOrCI1ON AcnJAL AcruAL BUOGET CALCUlATION SCENAlUO
Cað1pbtU 5Ö2,98S $119.624 51440581 SUO.JS<i $9S,m
~,...... ¡BS,7s:.~ 512..:;,576 5149,3511 $144,992 $98,708
Gilroy sso.m S79.192 S~.1t4 $92.,916 563,256
lø AJtm 562..122 $46,208 m.84S 554,216 $36,909
Los Alros Hills $3.948 $2,736 , SJJ07 S3.:UO $2,ISS
...... G>.tal SI07.442 . $109,744 S131Þ1G Sl~763 SS'/'.«>o
Milpita$ S1W,8S0 SZ5Z,I68 S304.TJe S2.9S,870 ,5201.424
Monic Sc.cno $2,2S6 SUZO 51.831 $1.783 51,214
Mocpa Hill 529,469 SU)6lI $10,330 SJ9,15 1 S26"-OO
MoUDWa VIeW W6.0S6 S209,304 S:Ö1.,971 $2"J18 - $161.186
"'. AIro m2.tn6 $2A6,0IIS sm.429 S21!8,736. . .5196,568
SaIl Jose $4,142,198 53.741,712 S4m,593 $4,391,211 $'2,993.103
SaaÞcw. $437,100 $311.184 S448,6?A $(,~t2 .' $296,491
SUa""p $33,840 $21.432 $2S,9QJ $25,146 S11,t19
~ $278.757 S?A9.280 SJOU87 S'l9Z.482 $199.111
0Iher (SdIoob) 5711.764 S2036S $24.617 S23,898 " Sl<i;z69
Salt lose AIrpon S28Z sm 5184 Sl7t "S138
Total City $6,28:5.921 S5,633,656 $6,809,000 $6,610.VOO WOO.OOO
.'
. Actual CoI1~ for AttachmeD.~ B aud C Vary Dlae to Adjustments Based oa City Input
'. ~
.'