CC Resolution No. 19-072 approving the Architectural and Site Approval (ASA-2018-04) 20565 Valley Green Dr RESOLUTION N0. 19-072
A RESOLUTION OF THE CUPEIZTINO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING AN
ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL PERMIT TO ALLOW THE
DEMOLITION OF AN EXISTING PUBLIC STORAGE FACILITY AND THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW PUBLIC STORAGE FACILITY CONSISTING OF
TWO (2) FOUR (4)-STORY BUILDING5 WITH BASEMENTS �.00ATED AT
20565 VALLEY GREEN DRIVE
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTIUN
Application No.: ASA-2018-04
Applicant: � Andres Friedman
Property Owner: Storage Equities, Inc.
Location: 20565 Valley Green Drive (APN: 326-10-044)
SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL PERMIT:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cupertino received �n application for an
. Architectural and Site Approval as described in Section I. of this Resolutio.n; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public noi;ices have been given as required by the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the City Council has held at least one public hearing
in regard to the application; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Comrnission held a public hearing on May 28, 2019 and
recommended that the City Council approve the application, subject to conditions; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970 (Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq.) ("CEQA"), together with the State CEQA
Guidelines(California Code of Regulations,Title 14,Section 15000 et seq.) (hereinafter, "CEQA
Guidelines"), the City staff has independently studied the proposed Project and has
determined that the Project is exernpt frorn environmental review pursuant to the categorical
exernption in CEQA Guidelines section 15332,and the exemption in CEQA Guidelines section
15183, for the reasons set forth in the staff repQrt dated May 28, 2019 and incorporated herein;
and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said
application; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows with regard to this application:
1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety,
general welfare, or convenience;
i
I
I
Resolution No.19-072 i
Page 2
i
The proposed project is �a redevelopment of an existing Public Storage facility. The Yedevelopment
- allows for continued operation and expansion of the existing use. The project will provide for a new '
building design that meets new building requirements, provided high quality architecture, and I
improvements in the vicinity, such as the 12 foot easement along the entire north side of the property ',
for a multi-use trail. The project will also provide increase landscaping and tree canopy coverage
throughout fhe site. Therefore, the proposal will not be detrimental or injurious to property or '
improvements in the vicinity. ,
2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 19.134, Architectural and Site
Review, of the Cupertino Municipal Code, the General Plan, and applicable specific plans,
zoning ordinances, conditional use permits, exceptions, subdivision maps, or other
entitlements to use which regulate the subject property including, but not limited to,
adherence to the following specific criteria:
a) Abrupt changes in building scale should be avoided. A gradual transition related to
height and bullc should be achieved between new and existing buildings; '
The proposed project complies with primary building height of 45 feet listed in �he General Plan:
Comrnunity Vision 2015-2040. Further, the project is located far from existing multi-story
buildings. The gradual transition related to height is completed by the use of vari�us building
materials, architec�ural features, and setbacks that help to avoad abrupt changes in building scale
and make the project compatible with any existing and ficture development(s).
b) In order to preserve design harmony between new and existing buildings and i� order
to preserve and enhance property values, the materials, textures and colors of new
buildings should harmonize with adjacent development by being consistent or
compatible with design and color schemes, and, with the future character of the
neighborhood and purposes of the zone in which they are situated.The location,height
and materials of walls, fencing, hedges and screen planting should harmonize with
adjacent development. Unsightly storage areas, utility installations and unsightly
elements of parl<ing lots should be concealed. The planting of ground cover or various
types of pa�ements should be used to prevent dust and erosion, and the unnecessary
destruction of existing healthy trees should be avoided. Lighting for development
should be adequate to meet safety requirements as specified by the engineering and
building departments, and provide shielding to prevent spill-over light to adjoining
property owners; ,
. The buil�ing is designed in a contemporar�architectural style to emulate an office building. The
architectural style is consistent with the adjacent office building uses and residential building.
The location, height and materials of walls, fencing, and plantings have been designed to
harmonize with adjacent structures. Utility structures and trash enclosures have been designed
to have landscaping that conceals the structures from adjacent uses. The project uses various
planting and ground cover materials to prevent dust and erosion,and the project is only removing
Resolution No. 19-072
Page 3
trees that are in conflict with necessary improvements to accommodate the proposed project.
Additionally, where trees are proposed for removal, new trees are replacing them. Lighting for the
development has been reviewed and design to minimize impacts to adjacent developmenfs by
preventing spillover light to adjacent properties.
c) The number, location, color, size, height, lighting and landscaping of outdoor
advertising signs and structures shall minimize traffic hazards and shall positively affect
the general appearance of the neighborhood and harmonize with adjacent development;
and
Signage approval is not included in this�application.
d) With respect to new projects within existing residential: neighborhoods, new
development should be designed to protect residents from noise, traffic, light and
visually intrusive ef£ects by use of buffering, setbacl<s, landscaping, walls and other
appropriate design rneasures.
The proposed project has increased front and rear setbacks from existing residential development. �
The project has been designed to protect residents from noise, traffic, light and visually intrusive �
impacts by placing the ac�ive uses more than 150 away from neighboring residential areas. -
Additionally, the project has incorporated perimeter landscaping to further minimize ariy visually
antrusave effer,ts to adjacent properties.
WHEREAS, on June 18, 2019, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to
receive ptxblic testimony on the Project, including the categorical exemption in CEQA
�
Guidelines section 15332 and the exemption in CEQA Guidelines section 15183 and reviewed �
and considered the information contained in the staff report pertaining to the Projeet, all other �
pertinent docuYnents, and all written and oral statements received by the City Council at or
prior to the public hearing; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that after careful consideration of the CEQA
exemption memorandum, maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in
this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this resolution beginning on
PAGE 3 thereof,
1. The City Council exercises its independent judgment and determxnes that the Project is
exernpt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15332 and the exemption 1n
CEQA Guidelines section 151$3. The exernption in CEQA Guidelines section 1,5332 applies
to an infill development project which 1) is consistent with the applicable General Plan
� designation and all applicable General Plan policies, as well as the applicable Zoning
designations and regulations; 2) occurs within the City limits on a site of less than 5 acres
in sxze that is substantially surrounded by urban uses; 3) is located on a site that has no
value for endangered, rare or threatened species; 4) would not result in any significant
effects related to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality; and 5) can be adequa�ely served
Resolution No.19-072
Page 4
by all required utilities and public services. The exemption in CEQA Guidelines section
15183 applies to a project that is consistent with General Plan designations and zoning for �
the site described in the General P1an, the potential impacts of which would be
substantially mitigated by the irnposition of unitormly applied standard conditions of i
approval. The General Plan Amendment, Housing Element Update, and Associated �
Rezoning Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2014032007), certified by the City
Council on December 4, 2014, was prepared consistent with the requirements for �
applicability of streamlining under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183(d)(2), and there are no ;
environrnental effects that are peculiar to the proposed project or project site that were not ''
analyzed in the General Plan EIR;
2. The application for an Architectural and Site Approval, Application no. ASA-2018-04 is '
hereby recommended to be approved; and
The subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution . '
are based are contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no.(s) ASA 2018- '
04 as set forth in the Minutes of the City .Council Meeting on June 18, 2019, and are
incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Ap�roval recommendation is based on the plan set dated k'ebruary 4, 2019 consisting of 26
sheets labeled as, "A Redevelopment for Public Storage" labeled as Sheet 1-26, prepared
by KSP Studio and BKF; except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution.
2. ACCURACY OF PROjECT PLANS
The applicant/property owner is responsible to v.erify all pertinent p�operty data including
but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacl<s, property size, building
square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any
misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may require
additional review.
3. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS
The conditions of approval contained in file nos. DP-2018-03, EXC-2018-01, and TR-2019-
11 are concurrently enacted, and shall be applicable to this approval.
4. ANNOTATION OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The conditions of approval set forth shall be incorporated into and annotated on the first
page of the building plans. � ,
Resolution No.19-072
Page 5 .
5. FINAL ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS AND EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS
� The final building exterior plan shall closely resemble the details shown on the original
approved plans. The final building design and exterior treatment plans (including but not
limited to details on exterior color, materials, architectural treatments, doors, windows,
lighting fixtures, and/or embellishments) shall be reviewed and approved by the Director
of Comrnunity Development prior to issuance of building permits and through an in-field
mocic-up of colors prior to application to ensure quality and consistency. Any exterior
changes determined to be substantial by the Director of C�ommunity Development shall
either require a modification to this permit or a new permit based on the extent of the
change.
6. EAST ELEVATION
The applicant shall work with the City to neutralize the building color and materials along
the eastern elevation, and sha11 rnodify the vegetation, as necessary, to improve the
aesthetics of the project.The modification shall be reviewed and approved by the Directo.r
of Community Development prior to the issuance of building permits.
7. MAXIMUM PARAPET HEIGHT �
The proposed parapet arehitectural feature/screen shall not exceed 37". �
8. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS � �
The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard �
to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any
misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community
Development Depariment.
9. INDEMNIFICATION
Except as otherwise prohibited by law, the applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless
the City, its City Council, and its off'icers, employees and agents (collectively, the
"indernnified parties") from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a
third party against one or rnore of the indemnified parties or one or more of the
indernnified parties and the appricant to attack, set aside, or void this Resolution or any
permit or approval authorized hereby for the project, including (without limitation)
reimbursing the City its actual attorneys'fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation.
The applicant shall pay such attorneys' fees and costs within 30 days following receipt of
invoices from City. Such attorneys' fees and costs shall include amounts paid to counsel
not otherwise employed as City staff and sha11 include City Attorney tirne and overhead
costs and other City staff overhead costs and any costs directly related to the litigation
reasonably incurred by City.
10. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS,RBSERVATIONS, OR OTHER EXACTIONS
:
i
;
Resolution No.19-072 �'I
Page 6 !
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication '
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government
Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the ,
amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications,reservations, and other exactions. '
You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest
these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(a),has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying
' with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later
challenging such exactions,
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino
this 18th day of June, 2019, by the following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES: Scharf, Chao, Paul, Sinl<s, Wi11ey
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SIGNED: � '
�.�� ���, .� �j
Steven Scharf, Mayor Date .
Cit of Cu ertino
ATTEST:
�-- � �'2--�� 1 �q
Grace Schmidt, Ci Clerk Date