CC Resolution No. 19-058 Approving the Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Project Funding RESOLUTION NO. 19-058
I
A RESOLUTION OF THE CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE
REQUEST TO THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FOR
THE ALLOCATION OF FISCAL YEAR 2019/2020 TRANSPORTATION
DEVELOPMENT ACT ARTICLE 3 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROJECT
FUNDING
WHEREAS, Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA), Public Utilities
Code (PUC) Section 99200 et sea., authorizes the submission of claims to a regional
transportation planning agency for the funding of projects exclusively for the benefit
and/or use of pedestrians and bicyclists; and
i
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as the regional
transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay region, has adopted MTC
Resolution No.4108, entitled "Transportation Development Act, Article 3, Pedestrian 1
and Bicycle Projects," which delineates procedures and criteria for submission of
requests for the allocation of"TDA Article 3" funding; and
WHEREAS, MTC Resolution No. 4108 requires that requests for the allocation of TDA
Article 3 funding be submitted as part of a single, countywide coordinated claim from
each county in the San Francisco Bay region; and
WHEREAS, the Cityof Cupertino desires to submit a request to MTC for the p q allocation
of TDA Article 3 funds to support the projects described in Attachment B to this
resolution, which are for the exclusive benefit and/or use of pedestrians and/or
bicyclists.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cupertino
that:
1. The City of Cupertino declares it is eligible to request an allocation of TDA Article 3
funds pursuant to Section 99234 of the Public Utilities Code;and
2 There is no pending or threatened litigation that might adversely affect the project
or projects described in Attachment B to this resolution, or that might impair the ability
of the City of Cupertino to carry out the project;and
Resolution No. 19-058
Page 2
3. The project has been reviewed by the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission (BPC) of City
of Cupertino; and
4 The City of Cupertino attests to the accuracy of and approves the statements in
Attachment A to this resolution;and
5. A certified copy of this resolution and its attachments, and any accompanying
supporting materials shall be forwarded to the congestion management agency,
countywide transportation planning agency, or county association of governments, as
the case maybe,of Santa Clara County for submission to MTC as part of the countywide
coordinated TDA Article 3 claim.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Cupertino this 21st day of May, 2019, by the following vote:
Vote Members of the City Council
AYES: Scharf, Chao, Paul, Sinks, Willey
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
SIG
f T�
Steven Scharf,Mayor Date
City of Cupertino
ATTEST:
Grace Schmidt, City Clerk Date
Resolution No. 19-058
Page 3
Attachment A
Re: Request to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission for the Allocation of Fiscal Year
2019/2020 Transportation Development Act Article 3 Pedestrian/Bicycle Project Funding
Findings
Page 1 of 1
1. That the City of Cupertino is not legally impeded from submitting a request to the Metropolitan
Transportation Commission for the allocation of Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article3
funds, nor is the City of Cupertino legally impeded from undertaking the project described in
"Attachment B" of this resolution.
2. That the City of Cupertino has committed adequate staffing resources to complete the project
described in Attachment B.
3. A review of the project described in Attachment B has resulted in the consideration of all
pertinent matters, including those related to environmental and right-of-way permits and
clearances, attendant to the successful completion of the project.
4. Issues attendant to securing environmental and right-of-way permits and clearances for the
projects described in Attachment B have been reviewed and will be concluded in a manner and on
a schedule that will not jeopardize the deadline for the use of the TDA funds being requested.
5. That the project described in Attachment B comply with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000 et seq.).
6. That as portrayed in the budgetary description of the project in Attachment B, the sources of
funding other than TDA are assured and adequate for completion of the project.
7. That the project described in Attachment B are for capital construction and/or design engineering;
and/or for the maintenance of a Class I bikeway which is closed to motorized traffic; and/or for
the purposes of restriping Class II bicycle lanes; and/or for the development or support of a
bicycle safety education program; and/or for the development of a comprehensive bicycle and/or
pedestrian facilities plan, and an allocation of TDA Article 3 funding for such a plan has not been
received by the City of Cupertino within the prior five fiscal years.
8. That the project described in Attachment B is included in a locally approved bicycle,pedestrian,
transit, multimodal, complete streets, or other relevant plan.
9. That any project described in Attachment B that is a bikeway meets the mandatory minimum
safety design criteria published in Chapter 1000 of the California Highway Design Manual.
10. That the project described in Attachment B will be completed before the funds expire.
11. That the City of Cupertino agrees to maintain, or provide for the maintenance of, the project and
facilities described in Attachment B, for the benefit of and use by the public.
Resolution No. 19-058
Page 4
Attaclunent B
Page 1 of 1
TDA Article 3 Project Application Form
Fiscal Year of this Claim:201912020 Applicant:City of Cupertino
Contactperson:David Stillman
Mailing Address: 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino,California
E Mail Address davidsQcupertino org Telephone:(408)777-3249
Secondary Contact in event primary not available
E-Mail Address: Tele hone:
Short Title Description of Pro'ect: Bike Boulevard Improvement Phase II Pro'ect
Amount of claim:$166,259
Functional Description of Project:
The project includes the following civil improvements:traffic signal upgrades at Miller Ave and Calle De Barcelona,Installing bulb-outs at Tilson Ave IS.
Tantau Ave Tilson Ave and Stern Ave and Kim StlKirwin Ln installing bike channelizers at Tilson AvelWunderlich Dr and Wunderlich Dr/Barnhart Ave
and installing wayfinding si na a and striping along Calle De Barcelona Finch Ave Tilson Ave Wunderlich Dr and Barnhart Ave.
Financial Plan:
List the project elements for which TDA funding is being requested(e.g.,planning,engineering,construction,contingency).Use the table below
to show the project budget for the phase being funded or total project. Include prior and proposed future funding of the project. Planning funds
may only be used for comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian plans. Project level planning is not an eligible use of TDA Article 3.
Pro'ect Elements: en ineerin construction contin enc
Funding Source All Prior FYs Application FY Next FY Following FYs Totals
TDA Article 3 $0 $166,259 $0 $0 $166,259
list all other sources:
1. City of Cupertino $0 $343,839 $0 $0 $343,839
General Funds
2.
3.
4.
Totals $0 $510,098 $0 $0 $510,098
Project Eligibility: YES?INO?
A.Has the project been approved by the claimant's governing body?(If"NO,"provide the approximate date approval No.
is anticipated). Anticipated
by 5/31/19
B.Has this project previously received TDA Article 3 funding?If"YES,"provide an explanation on a separate page. No
C.For"bikeways,"does the project meet Caltrans minimum safety design criteria pursuant to Chapter 1000 of the Yes
California Highway Design Manual?(Available on the internet via: http://www.dot.ca.gov).
D.Has the project been reviewed by a Bicycle Advisory Committee(BAC)?(If"NO,"provide an explanation). Enter Yes
date the project was reviewed by the BAC:June 21 2017 and March 21,2018
E.Has the public availability of the environmental compliance documentation for the project(pursuant to CEQA)been Yes
evidenced by the dated stamping of the document by the county clerk or county recorder?(required only for
projects that include construction).
F.Will the project be completed before the allocation expires?Enter the anticipated completion date of project(month Yes
and year)August 2020.
G.Have provisions been made by the claimant to maintain the project or facility,or has the claimant arranged for such Yes
maintenance by another agency?(If an agency other than the Claimant is to maintain the facility provide its name: