CC 04-11-62CI'!S OH.CUPBRTi1•u
or TM ADJ00jM'HtlMM MMnjj0 OP Tft Cif! COMM - April 11,
: 10321 So. Saratoga- �Spvala Road
8:00 P.lt.
xv
v
APR.13 W
a
�S �tRo'!hsl,
Of
the
l>e r '' Gn of olineno s
tit veal , as ,,.tea .. -»-
applJoitim ba postponed Mtil rile �oV1MOu Mmaa
t, u an aldietlMes were passed at not have
ennor he s
taken SM part in the di
voted an an It saassion. For this reason
the Mayor stated that the pro sod R -24 -9 ardInVIce should be con-
sidered and adopted by the incoming Council rather than tae out -
going iouncil.
He asked warner Wilson, representing Alpha Lad Company if
thin sounded reasonable.
Warner Wilson, x0650 North Stalling teed, agreed that he
would like to have See new Councilmen familiarize thcmelves with
the crdinance and in fact it would be a good'_ idea if the people who
had to consider applications under certain ordinances were the
same like to who had
or this new proposedeOrdinanccee 002k),he w uld
On consulting the calendar, it was noticed that April has 5
Mondays, making May 7 the next meting date. The Mayor said that
the three -week period should be beneficial to the City and to the
new Councilmen and to the applicants, in order words all concerned,
inasmuch as it would themselves with an ordinance whichit
they
to acquaint hey
have never seen.
Mr. Wilson said that the applicant is hoping for an urgency
ordinance, a simple R-24 -R zoning district, rather than the latest
version of OrdInsM0 zoning district. He said that Alpha eland 11COmpagv planned can build
residences in cnapliancordinance is rotkae ordinance which Is
R -24 and a planned community
Project.
Dempster Mayor sasked the
versions Cleric Ordinance 002(k). cilmn Finch and
Comlcilaan Hanatti inquired about Ordinance 206 andt2OT- iThe
CCity Attorney explained the reason for their passage
The Mayor scheduled Ordinance 206 and Ordinance 207 for the agenda
of April 16.
Councilman Henetti asked about the 6' masonry wall around the
Oemco building.
The City Manager answered that he has written 0emco of the
City'!+ position, explaining the fact that a 6' masonry wall is
rtipulated In the ordinance rezoning the subject property. The
Oesoo people may that a low wall with a planter is more expensive
than a 6' masonry wa11 � theyowould rather wild a 61 wall If If &
low wall with a plants
stated that he has ina+stigated the site and feels that a 6' wall
around the building as required by cbe ardi.unee would definitely
be �����p.mow in that it-�a provide a traffic hamzd.
row"eail7, it n dd � VW r vwbllity no al to bt doproue.
At little diaeaesdglti- the lipor with the gonpant of the
';u ted the -Cite frebaser be given auth0At3r to dieawes
`r with the applisant, perinps allowing planter breaks in
l��� sR�dard 6' wall. Mn atY Attorne7 a6mm WIN* this would
substantial 00VUanm with the o"LUmme, r4ouirIM no
r Cmoaihan Vmttf that the city )brawn► be ibstructed
ippii reamt oo�' fil�iWW7
=po7t�ta. asobes�a cr�oaailrem
t
JeiwLt, LOssen
s ,_ .8aich
YI
ad4lou ed at 8930
P.m-
a Nick J. lazenso
..� , _ liC... L
Vity Clerk