CC 03-08-67
.:"",
¡:~,;~.::
, .~~.
,,'*"'-"
~"'(,~,: ':t'~~
~,'".
''Ì '
·
·
·
·
, .
10300 Torre Avenue, cupertino, california, 95014
252-4505
.r .J,.
.'¥.
~dS
"".-"" ,",''',
'.',- 1;'-,.
.~:
':-td
' .
. .
.
II
CITY OF CUPERTINO
cal1forn1e
OF TBB AD.1uulU'&&i lUlUu1AR MEB'l'Im OF THE CITY Cuû1fCIL,
March 8, 1967
Councll Chambers. 10300 Torre Avenue, CUpertino
8:00 P.M.
I ROLL CALL
Counc. present: Fitzgerald. Johnson, stokes
Counc. absent: Dempster, Noel
Mayor Stokes noted that Counc. Dempster had t~ attend a
Trafficways committee meet~ng, and Counc. NOel was out of
town on bus1ness.
Staff present:
C1ty Manager, Ph11 Storm
C1ty Attorney, sam Anderson
C1ty Cler.k, Bill Ryder
Director of Public Works. Frank Finney
C1ty Engineer, Bob Shook
Record1ng Secretary, Lo1s Inwards
REVIEW ENGINEERS' ASSESSMENT SPREAD FOR DE ANZA IMPROVÐŒNT
DISTRICT
Mr. W. A. Howarth, of Lawrence G. Br1an & Company, Consu1t1ng
Engineers, 595 Pr1ce Avenue, Redwood C1ty, presented cop1es
of and rev1ewed the compilation of the engineers' report on
Resolut10n ot Intent10n No. 1381-3 of the C1ty Council of
the City of cupert1no ("De Ariza, et. a 1., Improvement Distr1ct
NO. 66-1"). This covered:
Ij Engineers' report and assessment
2 Assessment diagram and assessment role
3 Spec1t1cat10na and contract documents
4 Acquis1tion d1agram w1th 1nd1vidual legal descr1pt10ns
1be Improvement Distr1ct includes street 1mprovements for
Stevens creek Blvd. from the future West valley Freeway to
Highway 85; Stel11ng Road from a point Just north of Stevens
creek Blvd. to a pcint Just south of MCClellan Road;
McClellan Road from the future West valley Freeway to a point
Just epst of Stelling Road; and the off-street parking lot
for the De Anza College campus.
-1-
. .
:
,'1_
There wl1l be traffic signals at the 1ntersect10ns of Mary
Avenue and stevena creek Blvd.. stelling Road and McClellan .
Road, and Stevena cree1 Blvd.. and stelling Road; the latter
be1ng a brand neW innovat10n which w111 more efficientlY
handle the expected traffic loads. counc. P1tzgera1d asked
who would handle .the tratflc¡ Qontrol ~t this latter inter-
section. *. Jt)Wárth sa1d ttiëwcontrol1erw w111 auto_tica1lY
control 1t~ but 1t can also be preset.
The COllegejlarld.ng lot w111 be comp1ete17 lighted. 'Ø1ere
will be Wst]; ea.11ne" type street 11ght1D& up the center at
stevena creek Blvd., from R1g)nfaY &.) to the tuture vest
valley PreewQ'. 'l'1e per1meter road w111 also be lighted.
counc. Fitzgerald asked about the 1sland at peppertree ane
and stelling Road. Mr. Howarth sa1d it 1s going to be
constructed as nearly as poss1ble in accordance with the
requests 01' the homeowners 1n that area.
There 1s no sanitary sewer prov1ded for in this Improvement .
D1str1ct. The Director of public Works sa1d the cupert1no
sanitary District is ready to go in as soon as rights of way
have been obta1ned and cleared.
The area east of stelling Road is served by the san Jose
Water Works.
The C1ty ",-,nager introduced Dr. and MrS. DeHart and Dr. and .
MrS. Clement~, who were in the aud1ence. Dr. DeHart sa1d
De Anza conservatively anticipates an in1tial enrollment of
2800 day students and 2800 evening students. The large
auditorium, development of wh1ch tra11s that of the college
by one year, will really need these improvements.
Mayor Stokes noted that the C1ty of cupert1no's contr1bution
to th1s LID 1s $200,000. He asked where this money is going.
to come from. The City Manager stated th1s would come from
the gas tax funds and city drainage fees.
Mayor Stokes asked why the City's contribut10n was ra1s~d
from the orig1nal estimate. Mr. }fOward stroted that the
f1gure was ra1sed because in the f1rst block of Stevens creek
Bl vd., 1n the prelim1nary go-around, 1 t was estimated we
could save most of the ex1sting pavement. FUrther invest1ga-
tions have proved this is not poss1ble. The drawings d1s-
played on the bulletin board ind1cated those areas where the
pavement could be salvaged, wholly or in part, as well as
those areas that need complete 1mprovement.
.
l
-2-
.
.
.
'.
.
'III HESOIDTIONS FOR ADOPl'ION
A. Resolut10ns tor De Anza No. 66-l.
Mr. !en JOM. diStributed copies of the Resolut1ons and
s~ she.t. to tbe City council, as "ell aa an invest1-
pt10D report and .......nt proceedinp.
JIJQOr Stokes ..lied tl» Cit7 øma¡er 11' tbe .....lI88Dt. to
the 1Dd1vJ.4u1pro....Æ'tl owners are tbe __ .. tbQ' were.
'J.'be C1t7 .,........US4 tbeJ' are .88.tl8l17 tbe --. aUbouP
there 11111 1Mt'" ftriat10n .ince tbere ..... DO ...,-ea1"1D8
4ra1l1np .vaUab1. .t the t18e ot tbe tlret ..tu-te..
Resolution JII). 1381-6 .8 introduced _ tl» C11:7 A.ttorney.
I):)'1e4 by OoUDC. fttapl'!ld, .econðed _ counc. JohD80n, 1.0
J:dopt .8olut1cm JII). 1381-0.
AYES: counc. Pltzprald, Johnson, Ston8
JaYS: }lime
~AI'n: counc. J)lgpater, lIOe 1
RDtlon carried, 3-0
P.esc:~t1on NO. 1381-7 .as Introduced by the City Attorney.
~VN oy counc. F1tzcera1d, $~co~ed by Co¡,¡r.c. Jor.nson, to
&j~p~ Reso1ut1on 50. 1381-7.
AYES:
~~13:
A3Sr.7:
P1tzaera1d, ;~nn$on, Stokes
Counc.
None
=ounc .
Delllpeter, Noe:
RDt10n ~ar~leC, 3-0
~es.::~~lor: 50. 138:-8 was Int:-;~.!=~d by t:e :::lo;y Attorney.
~'..~j ty counc. F1tzlerald.. se,;,.j",ct by
ad~~o; Resolut1~n No. 1381-0.
Jo~.n.on. to
Co ¡,mc .
AYES: counc. P1tZlera1d, :;t.r.son, Stokes
·,·A13: None
ABSEN':': counc. Deapeter, No~:
Motion ~arr1ed, 3-0
Res.::~tlon No. 1381-9 was 1ntrod~ced by t~~ C1ty Attorney.
Moved by Counc. F1tzgerald, seconded by counc. John~on, to
adopt Resolut1on NO. 1381-9.
AYES: l:ounc. F1 tzgera Id, Johnson, Stokes
XA13: None
A3S~"T: counc. Dempster, Noel
Motion carried, 3-0
-3-
"
"
r(·'
.".,
"',
,; C
Ii,
f:"
Resolut1cn NO. 1381-10 was 1ntroduced by· the City Attorney.
Moved bl counC. P1tzgerald, seconded by Counc. Johnson, to .
adopt Resolut1oD JIo. 1381-10.
ADS: counc. P1tzgerald, Johnson, stokes
8'1S: NOne
·ß· , ABSBII'l': counc. ~.peter, Noel
Jl)tlon carr1ed, 3-0
Resolution NO. 1381-11, sett1ng the clos~ t1M tor acceptanCe
ot sealed propoea1s at 2:00 P.M., Apri! 6. 1961.
Moved b7 couno. P1tzgerald, seconded by counc. ,¡obn80n. to
adopt Resolution JIo. 1381-11.
P1tzgerald, Jor~son, Stokes
Dempster, Noel
Mot10n carried, 3-0
R.UlU'l'15 ORDER: Moved by ('.ounc. Pi tzgerald, seconded by COlmC. Johns:>n,
to :1elete the t1rs:; words of "for two week" on the second lln.
of Plge 1 of Resolution 1381-11.
AYES:
RAYS:
ABSENT:
counc.
None
Counc .
.
Mot1on carr1ed, 3-0
Res:l~~lon No. 1381-12, sett1:1.g the closlng tl.. :or
ac~eptance of sealed proposals at 2:00 P.M.. A~l 6,
196~.
.
Mc\'e~ by Counc. Fitzgerald, 8"~ --;jed ty ~.;:;,¡r.c. Jorr.son, t:;
a:1:pt Resolution ~o. 1381-12.
.
AYES:
NAYS:
A~EN:':
Fi tzgerald, ';O:-,:¡t' _.~. S' .:>ices
counc.
None
Counc.
Dempst.er, Noel
Motier; ca:':-it:d, 3-;)
Re.ol~tlon No. 1381-13 was lr.trujuced by the C1ty Attorney.
MoveJ by CounC. F1tzgerald, seconded by Counc. Johnson, to
a:Sopt Resolution No. 1381-13.
AYES:
RAYS:
ABSENT :
Fitzgerald, Johnson, Stokes
Dempster, Noel
Motlon carried, 3-0
.
Counc.
None
Cvunc.
-4-
J
.
.
IV
.
.
.
B. Reso1ut10n Accepting Right of way - Jt,:)IIestead Road
Improveamt
The C1ty.-naser 8&1d conditions have been placed on tMs
dedication b7 tbe attornQ'. 'lt1e City AttortJQ'1d:shed to add:
aIt. for an¡- reason. the funds are not received and improve-
MDts are not ...sa. the propert7 w111 be returned to the o1lDer."
lit ftCo~lIulded acceptance ot the ded1cat1on tdth the stipulation
that _ not117 tbe owner's attorn87 arid receive the condition.
The City ....pr asked that the city Attorney be authorized
to 1Ir1 te such a l~ter.
So moved by COUDC. Fitzgerald, seconded by coun~. Johnson.
AYES:
RnS:
ABSENT :
counc. JP1tzgerald, Johnson, Stokes
Rone
Counc. Dempster, Noel
Motion carr1ed. 3-0
REFeR:' ON QUARRY SITE - STEVENS CANYON ROAD
The =: ty Manager sa1d we w111 get a report after the County
H-C:r.~rol meet1ng the follow1ng day and then we w11: have
some :as1s on which to construct a lett~r. An appeal to the
Bca~ ~f superv1sors car. be made 1f th1s 1s passed by their
H-=;;~~ rol and Plar.ning CO!:1~issiCJn.
The =~~y Manager was instr~cted to contact all members of the
C1~¡ =~unc1l 1mmedlate:y ~pon receipt of this 1nfcrmat10n.
Co~c. Johnson sa1d th~ county Plann1ng Comm1ss10n w1~1 have
the:':- meeting on arch 15th. *' sa1à that roads are our
pr1ma~ concern and ~he county H-control w11l not be d1s-
cuss1:-:.g this aspect. He feels the leotter of protest si.~uld
be wr:'tten now. He sa1d all the H-control w111 be talk1ng
abo~~ 1s beaut1f1cat10n; he 1s c~r.cerned atout safety.
Co~c. Johnson asked why the letter that the counc11 approved
2t wee;cs alO has not been sen':. Counc. Fitzgerald sa..d, for
one ':hing, that he would l1ke to know a I1ttle m.:>re ab~ut
the s1tuation betore a letter 1s wr1tten.
COunc. Johnaon reviewed the mot1on: " . . . under the present
cond1t1ons, an add1tional quarry is pl'otested by the City of
CUpert1no.... 1* _phas1zed that we don't want a third
quarry up there because the exist1ng ::'06d cond1t10ns wo~¡d
_ke 1t un.ate.
-5-
. .
Ò'
V HEW æSIJŒSS
A. ea.1ss1on Appointments
'!'be CitJ' ___pr will send out cop1.ea of a list showing
present appointees and the1r tel'llll to Cc8D1ss10na arid
O.AlØittees.
B. JUscellaneOUS -- There was none.
VI ADJOOP.JVI&d
Moved by COW1C. Fitzgerald, seconded by COW1C. Johnson, to
adJo.lrn the meeting at 9:05 P.M.
Mvt10n carr1ed, 3-0
APPRO'nD:
/s/ Gar~ G. Stokes
Mayor, C ty or cupertino
A'ITEST:
'¡1m. E. Ryder
City ClerK
- 6 -
.
at
I
.
!
.
b
1
"
t'·
.