Loading...
CC 08-21-00AGENDA CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~ REGULAR MEETING 10300 Torre Avenue, City Hall Council Chamber Monday, August 21, 2000 6:45 p.m. Legislative Review Committee - 6:15 p.m. - Conference Room A CITY COUNCIL MEETING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS 1. Presentation by Joe Adamo of Millennium Flag for Cupertino trails. POSTPONEMENTS WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is r~served for persons wishing to address the council on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the council from making any decisions with respect to a matter not listed on the agenda. CONSENT CALENDAR Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff, or a member of the public, it is requested that items 2 through 18 be acted on simultaneously. 2. Minutes: June 19 and July 17 regular meetings, July 27 special meeting, and the August 8 regular adjourned meeting. 3. Accounts payable: July 7, July 14, July 21, July 28, August 4, and August 11, Resolutions 00-211, 00-212, 00-213, 00-214, 00-226, and 00-227. 4. Payroll: July 21 and August 4, Resolutions 00-215 and 00-216. 5. Treasurer's Budget Report, June 2000. 6. Approving destruction of certain records (Planning and Building), Resolution 00-217. August 21, 2000 Page 2 Cupertino City Council & Cupertino Redevelopment Agency Review of application for Alcoholic Beverage Control license for Delta Bowl (Homestead FFC Inc.), 20990 Homestead Road. Proposed sixth amendment to adjust Hazardous Vegetation Management Program fees - 2000/2001 season, Resolution 00-218. Resginding Resolution No. 98-033 and adopting the Conflict of Interest Code of the City of Cupertino for officials and designated employees, Resolution 00-219. 10. Request from Cupertino Host Lions Club for waiver of use fees for one fund raising event scheduled at Blackberry Farm, Thursday, August 17, 2000, and one to be held at the Quinlan Community Center, Sunday, September 17, 2000. 11. Public nuisance abatement: Set public hearing to consider abating a public nuisance (overgrown foliage obstructing the sidewalk and street, an appliance, broken equipment, and litter in the front yard and driveway) at 7535 Normandy Way (APN 366-11-151, William and Elena Kettler, property owners), Resolution 00-220. 12. Leadership Cupertino/Tomorrow's Leaders Today: (a) Authorizing execution of sponsorship agreement (b) (c) (d) between and among the Cupertino Chamber of Commerce; the University of California, Santa Cruz; and Foothill De Anza Community College District to share equally in liability for 2000/01 Authorizing execution of contract with Darryl Stow for Executive Director, leadership Cupeffino Authorizing execution of contract with Barbara Nunes for Executive Director, Tomorrow's Leaders Today Authorizing execution of contract with Gall Jensen for Executive Director, Tomorrow's Leaders Today 13. Acceptance of municipal improvements (documentation not required): (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Fazlottah/Jessica Behesti, 10707 Santa Lucia, APN 342-17-094 Alan K. Yuen & Meekie Y. Cheung, 22277 Crescent Road, APN 326-16-084 Thomas D. & Stephanie L. Downey, 10192 Peninsula Ave., APN 326-22-023 Chandravadan N. & Aarti C. Patel, 10220 Dubon Avenue, APN 342-14-051 Anne & Philipe Dot, 22525 Balboa Road, APNs 342-18-032, 033, 034, 035 14. Acceptance of city project performed under contract (documentation not required): McClellan Road School Zone Pedestrian Safety Improvements, Project 2000-01. 15. Cupertino Senior Center Expansion, McCrary Construction, change order no. 5, Project 99-9210, (agreement 00-004), Resolution 00-221. 16. Modification of agreement with Tally's Enterprises (# 99-068) for curb, gutter, and sidewalk work, Resolution 00-222. August 21, 2000 Cupertino City Council & Page 3 Cupertino Redevelopment Agency 17. Improvement agreement with G. B. Estate Homes, 10322 N. Stelling Road, APN 326-30- 089, agreement 00-090, Resolution 00-223. 18. Authorizing participation in the "Spare The Air City and County" Campaign, Resolution 00-224. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above) PUBLIC HEARINGS 19. Hossain Khaziri, Application 4-Z-97, 5-U-97, 7-TM-99, 14-EA-97, and 32-EA-99. Request to consider rezoning APN 326-02-051 located at 22020 Homestead Road to P (Res) Zone, a use permit to demolish a vacant service station and construct 7 single family residences, and a tentative map to create 7 lots. Negative Declarations are recommended, and this item is recommended for approval. Continued from July 17. (a) First reading of Ordinance No. 1852: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City Of Cupertino Approving the Rezoning of a 0.96-Acre Lot From P(Cg) to P(Res) Located At 22020 Homestead Road". Actions to be taken: 1. Grant Negative Declarations. 2. Approve 4-Z-97 per Planning Commission Resolution 6037, modify or deny. 3. If approved, conduct first reading of Ordinance 1852 4. Approve 7-TM-99 and 5-U-97 per Planning Commission Resolution 6038 and 6039, modify or deny 20. Public hearing to consider the appeal of two conditions of the Planning Commission approval of application 09-U-00, filed by Wayne Y. Gong. The application requested a use permit to add 1,120 square feet to an existing shopping center and modify the exterior of the buildings. PLANNING APPLICATIONS 21. R-1 ordinance review (application 07-SP-00): One year review of the R-1 ordinance to determine if it has had a positive effect on reducing building mass and better integrating new construction and modifications into neighborhoods. 22. Wireless Communications Facilities Master Plan (Application 09-SP-00): Budget allocation. UNFINISHED BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS 23. Appointment(s) to Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee. August 21, 2000 Page 4 Cupertino City Council & Cupertino Redevelopment Agency 24. Clarify council intent regarding funding (loan vs. grant) awarded to Cupertino Community Services (CCS) for affordable housing project. Continued from July 17. 25. Park dedication fees, first reading of Ordinance No. 1853: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapters 14.05 and 18.24 to Clarify Park Maintenance and Dedication Fees." 26. Approval of revised 2000/2001 Capital Improvement Program (CIP), Resolution 00-225. 27. General Fund Reserve policy based on Council discussions on August 8, 2000. 28. Review of bids and award of contract for fuel tank replacement, project 2000-104, (agreement 00-091). ORDINANCES 29. Second reading and enactment of Ordinance No. 1850: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino, California, Approving and Adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Cupertino Vallco Redevelopment Project". STAFF REPORTS COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Statton: Association of Bay Area Governments - Alternate Legislative Review Committee Sister City Committee - Toyokawa West Valley Mayors and City Managers Vice-Mayor James: Library Expansion Committee Cupertino Audit Committee Economic Development Team Environmental Review Committee - Alternate Leadership Cupertino Northwest Flood Control Zone Advisory Committee Santa Clara County Cities Association - Alternate Santa Clara County Emergency Preparedness Commission Senior Center Expansion Committee West Valley Mayors and City Managers - Alternate Councilmember Bumett: North Central Flood Control Zone Advisory Committee Public Dialog Liaison August 21, 2000 Cupertino City Council & Cupertino Redevelopment Agency Page 5 Santa Clara County Cities Association Representative, ABAG Board of Directors Santa Clara County Committee on Housing & Community Block Grant Program Santa Clara County Library District JPA Board of Directors - Alternate Santa Clara County Transportation Agency Policy Advisory Committee Santa Clara Valley Water Commission Senior Center Expansion Committee Councilmember Chang: Association of Bay Area Governments Leadership Cupertino Legislative Review Committee Library Expansion Committee Public Dialog Liaison Santa Clara County Cities Association Santa Clara County Committee on Housing & Community Block Grant Program- Alternate Santa Clara County Emergency Preparedness Commission - Alternate Councilmember Lowenthal: Association of Bay Area Governments - Alternate Cupertino Audit Committee Economic Development Team Environmental Review Committee Santa Clara County Library District JPA Board of Directors CLOSED SESSION 1. Negotiations for purchase, sale, exchange, or lease of real property - Government Code Section 549515.8 - 103415 Scenic Boulevard 2. Pending litigation - Government Code Section 5495&9(a) - Nemetz vs. City of Cupertino Significant exposure to litigation - Government Code Section 5495&9Co)(1) - Paul Fong and Grace Mock vs. Cupertino Community Services (CCS) ADJOURNMENT To 5:00 p.m., Tuesday, September 5, for interviews of applicants and appointment to the Parks and Recreation Commission. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING Canceled due to lack of business. DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL - Regular Meeting CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ~ Regular Meeting Monday, June 19, 2000 CITY COUNCIL MEETING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 6:45 p.m. Mayor Statton called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Council members present: Mayor John Statton, Vice-Mayor Sandra James, and Council members Don Bumett, Michael Chang, and R/chard Lowenthal. Council members absent: None. Staff present: Interim City Manager Carol AtWood, City Attorney Charles Kilian, Community Development Director Steve Piasecki, Public Information Officer Donna Krey, Public Works Director Bert Viskovich, Recreation Supervisor Don McCarthy, City Planner Ciddy Wordell, Planner Michele Rodriguez, and City Clerk Kimberly Smith. CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS 1. Proclamation recognizing Made Moore, retiring emergency services coordinator. Mayor Stattorr presented the proclamation, and declared Monday, June 19 2000, to be Made Moore Day in Cupertino. Ms. Moore thanked council for the support that they had shown to the emergency preparedness program, and for accepting County fire as a partner in the program. She said she was privileged to have been the first emergency services coordinator in that partnership. The council members offered their thanks and congratulations. Mrs. Nancy Bumett asked for graduates of the Cupertino Emergency Response Team training program to stand. POSTPONEMENTS Item 24, Appeal of Planning Commission denial of Application 16-U-98, Adzich Properties Continuance requested to July 17. Council concurred to continue this item. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 2 CONSENT CALENDAR Bumett moved to approve the items on the Consent Calendar as presented, with the exception of the minutes of June 5, which will be distributed at the next meeting. Chang seconded and the motion carried 5-0. 2. Minutes: June 1 regular adjourned meeting, with a correction of clerical errors as noted. 3. Accounts payable: June 2 and June 9, Resolution Nos. 00-170 and 00-171 4. Payroll: June 9, Resolution No. 00-172. o Authorizing execution of Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for animal control, sheltering, and licensing services, Resolution No. 00-173. (An amended copy was handed out, which corrected clerical errors) o Authorizing execution of Joint Exemise of Powers agreement for Workforce Development Services pursuant to the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, Resolution No. 00-174. Review of application for Alcoholic Beverage Control license for Loree Liquors, 19050 Stevens Creek Boulevard. o Change Order No. 3, Cupertino Senior Center Expansion, Project 99-9210, Resolution No. 00-175. o Making determinations and approving the reorganization of territory designated "San Femando Avenue 00-05," approximately 0.456 acre located on the north side of San Femando Avenue between Byme Avenue and Orange Avenue; Wang and Yen (APN 357-15-048), Resolution No. 00-176. 10. Authorizing execution of agreement of employment between the City of Cupertino and City Manager David Knapp, Resolution No. 00-177. 11. Quitclaim deed and authorization for underground water rights: A. Johan A. Darmawan and Susana T. Darmawan, 22650 Alcalde Road, APN 342- 16-042, Resolution No. 00-178 B. Sanjay Swamy and Tulsi B. Swamy, 10655 Santa Lucia Rd., APN 342-17-007, Resolution No. 00-179 12. Grant of easement for roadway purposes: A. Johan A. Darmawan and Susana T. Darmawan, 22650 Alcalde Road, APN 342- 16-042, Resolution No. 00-180 June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 3 Sanjay Swamy and Tulsi B. Swamy, 10655 Santa Lucia Rd., APN 342-17-007, Resolution No. 00-181 13. Setting A. Bo date for consideration for reorganizations: Area designated "Grenola Drive 00-02," property located on the north side of Grenola Drive between Flora Vista Avenue and Ann Arbor Drive; approximately 0.215 acre, Liou And Chen (APN 326-28-009). Resolution No. 00-182 Area designated "Alcazar Avenue 00-08," property located on the south side of Alcazar Avenue between Orange Avenue and Imperial Avenue; approximately 0.183 acre, Bruffey and Eastman (APN 357-19-012). Resolution No. 00-195 14. Recommendation from Telecommunications Commission for grant award. 15. Authorizing execution of agreements with Santa Clara County: A. Household Hazardous Waste Collection Program, Resolution No. 00-183 B. County wide AB 939 implementation, Resolution No. 00-196 16. Authorizing execution of agreement with Nextel of California, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, for lease of antenna site, Resolution No. 00-184. 17. Amending the Unrepresented Employees' Compensation Program, Resolution No. 00- 185. 18. Acceptance of municipal improvements: Jeff Yang, 21896 Granada Ave., APN 357-16- 023 (no documentation required). 19. Request from Iranian Federated Women's Club and Payvand Cultural School for waiver of use fees for the fourth annual Iranian Art and Cultural Event. 20. Authorizing Execution of First Amendment to Agreement between the City of San Jose and the city of Cupertino for maintenance of traffic signals under joint jurisdiction, Resolution No. 00-186. Vote Council members Ayes: Bumett, Chang, James, Lowenthal, and Statton Noes: None Absent: None Abstain: None. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR (above) The City Clerk said the minutes of the June 5 regular meeting will be presented at the next meeting. June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 4 JOINT MEETING - CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ROLL CALL Redevelopment Agency members present: Chairperson John Statton, Vice-Chairperson Sandra James, and members Don Bumett, Michael Chang, and Richard Lowenthal. Members absent: None (City Council members also serve as the Redevelopment Agency). ROLL CALL At 7:00 p.m., Mayor Statton called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California. City Council members present: Mayor John Statton, Vice-Mayor Sandra James, and Council members Don Burnett, Michael Chang, and Richard Lowenthal. Council members absent: None. Redevelopment Agency members present: Chairman John Statton, Vice-Chair Sandra James, and Agency members Don Bumett, Michael Chang, and Richard Lowenthal. Redevelopment Agency members absent: None. Staff present: Carol Atwood, Acting City Manager and Finance Director of the Agency; Charles Kilian, City Attorney and General Counsel to the Agency, Community Development Director Steve Piasecki, City Planner Ciddy Wordell, Public Information Officer Donna Krey, Public Works Director Bert Viskovich, and Kimberly Smith, City Clerk and Secretary to the Agency. Redevelopment Attorney for the City and Agency: Nicole Murphy. Representatives of Keyser Marston: Debbie Kern and Paul Andersen. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING Joint public hearing of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency on the proposed redevelopment plan for the Cupertino Vallco Redevelopment Project. Statton opened the public hearing. Atwood reviewed the history of the Vallco Shopping Center and discussed the intent of the redevelopment project. Nicole Murphy, Redevelopment Attorney, entered into the record the following items: Exhibit 1, affidavit of publication; Exhibit 2, certificate of mailing to property owners and business owners and operators; Exhibit 3, certificate of mailing to the governing bodies of each taxing agency; and Exhibit 4, certification of legal actions taken by the City Council, Planning Commission, and Agency. Murphy summarized the proposed redevelopment plan, and it was entered into the record as Exhibit 5. She reviewed the major evidentiary findings, which are as follows: June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 5 A finding that the project area is a blighted area, meeting the legal qualifications prescribed by the Legislature, and that redevelopment of the project area is necessary to effectuate the public purposes described in the community redevelopment law; a finding that the adoption and carrying out of the redevelopment plan is economically sound and feasible; a finding that the redevelopment plan conforms to the general plan of the City of Cupertino; and a finding that the condemnation of said property as provided for in the redevelopment plan is necessary to the execution of the redevelopment plan, and that adequate provisions have been made for the payment of properties to be acquired as provided by law. She said the evidence supporting these and other findings is contained principally in the Agency's report to the City Council. Mr. Paul Anderson, Kaiser Marsten Associates, summarized parts of the report of the agency to the City Council that included the basic supporting documentation for the redevelopment plan and the ordinance that will adopt a redevelopment plan. He summarized the blight findings, the implementation plan, the supplement, and a report to City Council. Debbie Kern, Kaiser Marsten, reviewed the projects and programs and the financial feasibility component of the report to Council. The Report of the Agency to the City Council was entered into the record as Exhibit 6, and the Supplement to the Report of the Agency to the City Council was entered into the record as Exhibit 7. City Planner Wordell summarized the environmental impact report which was entered into the record, and submitted as part of the report to City Council, identified as Exhibit 8 The rules governing property owner participation were entered into the record as Exhibit 9. Wordell said that some written comments had been received and were already a part of the record. One was a letter received May 31st from Public Economics, Inc., which is a consulting firm representing Foothill-De Anza College District and Fremont Union High School District. The letter states that it is not a written objection, but represents an ongoing dialogue that they would like to have. She said a second letter was submitted this evening and was distributed to City Council. It will also be made part of the record and is again part of the continuing dialogue hoping that there would be some provision made for an affordable housing program to specifically address school district employees. She noted that two other letters that had also been received today would be included as part of the record as Exhibit 10. Statton asked for oral testimony in favor or in opposition to the redevelopment plan. Mr. William Litt said he was an attorney with Bay Area Legal Aid that represents low- income residents of Cupertino. He said he was submitting for the record a letter containing their objections. He also submitted a videotape of the proposed project area, June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 6 which he would like to have included in the official record. His primary objection on behalf of his client was that there is not substantial evidence supporting the findings of physical blight or economic blight. They also objected to the fact that the project area is entirely commercial and does not now and will not have any affordable housing on it. Also, it appears that the primary purpose of this project is to subsidize private development and private improvement of the shopping center. The Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal have consistently spoken out against that kind of use of the power of redevelopment, including taking property by eminent domain and reselling to private parties. In addition, the California Legislature has declared the fundamental purpose of redevelopment is to extend a supply of low to moderate income housing, and this proposed project does not do that. Mr. Don Favorito said he was the owner of Penguin's Frozen Yogurt. He said about two years ago he heard of the possibility that the lower level of the mall would be removed and replaced by parking. He thought that was the wrong thing to do, and now it seems like it will come to pass. In 1988, the lower level was constructed because Valley Fair expanded and Vallco was afraid of losing business, so the lower level was constructed at great cost. Now it is going to be done away with and turned into parking, and that doesn't seem the right way to go. He asked when the construction of the parking structure will begin and when will Vallco be put into the redevelopment agency plan. Wordell said a specific development has not yet been applied for, so there is no approval date in site and, therefore, no construction schedule of which the city is aware. She clarified that the Vallco redevelopment area is the Vallco shopping center. There was a motion and second to close the public hearing, and motion carried unanimously. Murphy said written objections have been received, but it is not clear whether the written objections are from affected property owners in the project area. Bay Area Legal Aid represents citizens of Cupertino, and is not clear whether those are property owners. Also there are two other letters from a law firm representing an un-named client. She recommended that the City Council act on these letters, as though they were written objections requiring a response, and she will prepare a response for City Council consideration. Council concurred to continue this item until the next regular meeting of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency on July 17. APPROVAL OF MINUTES B. Minutes of the May 15, 2000, Redevelopment Agency meeting. Burnett moved to adopt the minutes as presented. Chang seconded and the motion carried 5-0. June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 7 NEW BUSINESS C. Agency certifies and makes findings based upon consideration of the Final Environmental Impact Report, Resolution No. RA-00-06. Continued to July 17, 2000. Agency finds that the use of taxes allocated from the Project for the purpose of improving and increasing the community's supply of low- and moderate-income housing outside the Project Area will be of benefit to the Project, Resolution No. RA-00-07. Continued to July 17, 2000. ADJOURNMENT At 7:30 p.m., the Redevelopment Agency adjourned. CITY COUNCIL MEETING Eo City Council certifies and makes findings based upon consideration of the final Environmental Impact Report. Resolution No. 00-187. Continued to July 17, 2000. Fo City Council finds that the use of taxes allocated from the Project for the purpose of improving and increasing the community's supply of low- and moderate-income housing outside the Project Area will be of benefit to the project. Resolution No. 00-188. Continued to July 17, 2000. Go City Council approves and adopts the Redevelopment Plan, first reading of Ordinance No. 1850: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino, California, Approving and Adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Cupertino Valleo Redevelopment Project." (Second reading and enactment scheduled for August 21, 2000.) Continued to July 17, 2000. PUBLIC HEARINGS 21. Operating budget for the 2000-01 fiscal year: Public hearing to adopt the 2000-01 fiscal year operating budget, establish appropriation limit, and approve the granting of a Negative Declaration. A. Adopt an operating and construction budget for fiscal year 2000-01 by ratifying estimates of revenues to be received in each fund and appropriating moneys therefrom for specified activities and accounts and setting forth conditions of administering said budget, Resolution No. 00-189 June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 8 B. Establish an appropriation limit for fiscal year 2000-01, Resolution No. 00-190 Acting City Manager Carol Atwood said that Council will be adopting a $55 million revenue budget, and the general fund portion of that is approximately $31 million. The expenditures are $58.9 million, which includes the capital improvement projects, and the general fund portion of that is $31.4 million. Atwood reviewed the staff report and provided responses raised during the the budget study session..She said the value of the space provided for the Historical Society at the Quinlan Center is about $12,900 per year. Their attendance and outreach statistics are as follows: Quinlan Center, 3,700 visitors; Vallco Museum 418; Traveling Trunk program 1,484. Atwood said the Snyder house has no identified used at this time, so renovation costs have been included. Regarding Pac Bell DSL, they will be switching stations within the next two years, and the city's Telecommunication Commission will be working with them on the project. Funding has been added for a plan check contract and funding has been moved fi:om the unprogrammed to the programmed CIP list for the Stevens Creek Trail, the Stevens Creek Trail CEQA, and the DeAnza Trail feasibility study. A work session will be held later with the new city manager and council to review the reserve level as well as the CIP criteria. Lowenthal said he had met with County Parks and Recreation about the feasibility study and the trail alignment through Rancho San Antonio County Park. The city will take responsibility for those, and the county has agreed to pay for the improvements. They do not have the feasibility plan budgeted, but they will pay for half of the study so the city's cost will be reduced by $12,500. Viskovich suggested that the number stay the same in the budget, and the county could be billed when it is complete. Burnett said that the DeAnza Trail is the one that follows the railroad tracks, and he felt that was a lot of money to spend without having some assurance fi:om the railroad that they will allow them to happen. He asked staff to see if there is some way to get approval in advance, and Lowenthal concurred. Mayor Statton opened the public hearing. Mr. Charles Newman, President of the Cupertino Historical Society, referred to his presentation at the council study session on June 1st and written material that had been handed out. He asked those in the audience in support of the Cupertino Historical Society to stand up. Mrs. Frances Bush said she was delighted to have participated in the traveling trunk program, and described the items that are shared with the children. The program has been operation for 25 years, and it includes both present-day and historical items. Lowenthal asked for more information about the Historical Society fund-raising efforts and whether they charge for services. Mr. Newman said there is an annual barbecue and an annual fund-raising event. Last year's fundraiser at Fremont Older raised a couple thousand dollars. This year the event will be held in his home, which is the old San Antonio school. For the last two years, they have received $2,000 in support fi:om Hanson. There is also an annual fund drive, which last year brought in just short of June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 9 $15,000. The previous year they were able to raise nearly $20,000. The Society also received a substantial donation from Mr. Bun-ell Leonard in the amount of $100,000. They can spend only the interest on that amount and the firms are being invested through the Community Foundation of Silicon Valley, which has been earning 14 %-15% over the last few yearS. He said that the membership is remaining stable and those funds are ongoing. They request that members join at a higher level rather than the minimum amount, and the encourage people to remember the Historical Society in their will. The total endowment at this time is $18,000 plus Mr. Leonard's donation. Mr. Newman said they hope not to request funding every year, but their projections do show the need for ongoing assistance. In the meantime they Historical Society will continue its efforts to raise more funds. Mr. Newman said the city is providing a service to the community in partnership with the Historical Society, os it is appropriate that public funds be allocated to assist in this joint effort. James said that she was opposed to funding personnel because it creates a reliance on outside funding, which would make it difficult for council to not fund it the following year. However, she also saw the need to protect the city's history and culture. She recommended that $40,000 be granted this year and then have staff identify how the city's parmership with the Historical Society will work. She recommended that the chairs for the council chamber not be funded this year, because this year council will be doing a master plan for the whole City Center area. Burnett said that he was in favor of funding the chairs since they are well overdue for replacement, and can be used in any new facility. Lowenthal said he was in favor of funding for the Historical Society, but he hoped they could become independent. He suggested that they find ways to control their spending and then put some of that savings into the endowment fund. James moved to adopt the 2001/01 budget, Resolution No. 00-189, including the list of proposed programs, but not to approve funding for the council chamber's chairs. Motion failed for lack of a second. Burnett moved to adopt the 2001/01 budget, Resolution No. 00-189, including all proposed programs. Motion carried 4-1, with James voting no. James moved to adopt resolution No. 00-190, establishing the appropriation limit for fiscal year 2000/0. Lowenthal seconded, and the motion carded 5-0. Mayor Statton re-ordered the agenda to hear item No. 26 next. NEW BUSINESS 26. Johnson Lyman Architects (Andronico's), Applications 2-U-00 and 4-EA-00, use permit for the demolition of a cinema and retail space and the construction of a new 32,160 square foot market and cooking school at The Oaks shopping center, 21275 Stevens Creek Boulevard. The application is recommended for approval and a Negative Declaration is recommended. Council watched a brief video roll-in and Piasecki reviewed the staff report. He said the commission forwarded a minute order to the council asking them to expedite the Mary Avenue crosswalks, and staff recommends that the applicant be required to participate in June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 10 those costs in the amount of $20,000. The planning commission also forwarded a minute order asking that the council bring the issue of the theaters to the attention of the Flint Center management and the city recreation programs. The commission is concerned about the sentiment that the city is losing a valuable community resource, and they stated that the city has no control over the decision of the Oaks management to terminate the lease, so the only issue before the Planning Commission and City Council is the use permit for the market. Mayor Statton opened the public hearing. Mr. Dave Johnson, architect, said they had been through a lengthy design process with the Planning Commission and the design was improved as a result. Architectural attention was paid to the front of the building, which faces west towards the freeway, and they agree that the central courtyard area is vitally important to create a dynamic location to attract people. He discussed the circulation, seating areas, walk up window, and bicycle racks. James said it was important that emphasis be placed on drawing people into the center courtyard and not just the eastern entrance. Mr. Bill Andronico, applicant, said there are a number of other markets in the community, but none quite like the Andronico's proposed for this location. In addition to specialty items, they also have prepared foods, and will create a gathering space for people. Prepared foods, organic breads, and other bread related items are one of the fastest-growing categories. They believe they can create a collection of food and services, along with the cooking school, that would create a food, wine and living experience that is not currently offered in Cupertino. Statton asked if they become involved in community events. Mr. Andronico said they have been in business since 1929 and always have' close ties with their communities, particularly focusing on disadvantaged children. Also, their store manager will be a member of the Chamber of Commerce and they would participate in community affairs. Mr. Shawn Wyllie, 7640 Erin Way, expressed his concerns about the traffic impacts and said that no traffic impact analysis was performed on the project. He felt there would be 230 net trips, not 77, which would trigger a traffic impact analysis. Mr. Wyllie explained how his calculations differed from that of the traffic engineer, and he requested that a traffic analysis be performed to analyze the traffic currently generated bythe movie in the Mary-Stevens Creek p.m. peak hour. He said this is a very large change in the intensity of use, as well as changing a primary anchor tenant, and he felt it would become just another strip mall. Mr. Tony Vandersteen, 10401 Phar Lap Drive, said he had been actively protesting the loss of the movie theater. Since it was the only one in the city, Andronico's will not meet the same need and will not draw in sales tax into the community, since there is another Andronico's only about three miles away. In terms of the traffic, this is the worst location in the city, and a smaller market and a small theater has never been considered. He asked that this be postponed until it can be reviewed from the community stand point and recommendations made to the owner. June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 11 Mr. Brian Hiles, Assistant Manager of the Oaks Theater, asked council to consider where their decision may lead in 30 years. He felt approval of this project may perpetuate the decline of the center. He was not opposed to Andronico's, and many in the community are very complimentary to the market, but he felt this is the wrong location. Mrs. Anna Polman-Black, a Cupertino resident, was concerned about how congested this area will become. Foothill College has a very nice theater, although it is not a movie theater. Within a short distance there are 3 grocery stores, and this one is not needed. Ms. Karen Jacobsen, a Cupertino resident, said she would try to represent some of the people she had met while participating in the discussion of this matter. She said that one of the Planning Commission members reacted very abruptly to the comments that over a thousand signatures have been received on petitions opposing the demolition of the Oaks Theater. She appreciated the effort taken by the petitioners, and they were freely signed by the theater patrons without anyone promoting it. There are other markets very close by, and Whole Foods offers an almost identical product in terms of organic items. Also, the traffic congestion will increase. The movie theater has created an identity in the community, and she did not feel that Andronico's will revive the center. Burnett said that a legitimate concern has been raised about traffic impacts. For example, the documentation used the Andronico's in Danville for comparison, and the statistics from Los Altos would probably be more appropriate. One important feature is that this should become truly accessible for pedestrians. A pedestrian crossing over Mary Ave. would really help, as well as a way to help people get across the Highway 85 ramp. Lowenthal agreed and said that there also needs to be improved access from the Glenbrook Apartments. He felt there should be improvements in both pedestrian access and traffic calming, and the developer should pay about a quarter of those costs. Statton said the 5-year capital improvement program has up to $25,000 currently in the unprogrammed category. It will be costly to create a desirable gateway into the Mary Avenue area, and the Monta Vista access may add more to that cost. Discussion followed about parking. Staff indicated that there is a standard formula for commercial shopping centers, and this one will have a surplus. Also, there is overflow parking on Mary Avenue. James said there would actually be fewer spaces than before the development was proposed, and there have been parking problems in the past from people using that 'lot when they go to the Flint Center. She said that perhaps the city could do a better job about monitoring the problem. Staff said there is also an area in the northeast comer 'where there's some additional parking available if it is re-striped and re-configured. James noted that pedestrians on Mary Avenue will not only be the result of Andronico's but also the larger senior center, so perhaps the street.should be reconfigured anyway. Perhaps a planted median on Mary would help people to get across the street, which is very wide, and the city and Andronico's could share the cost. June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 12 Bumett said he would like to acknowledge the concerns of the community concerning the loss of the theater. Another difficult loss was the Clean, Well-Lighted Place for Books. However, Andronico's will take over a site where several restaurants have failed, and it will be an asset to the city. Lowenthal said he did not agree with the statement that council does not have any control about this project. He also loved the theater and ice cream store, and hated to lose that experience and low-cost entertainment. However, he did not want to someday miss Hobee's, or Jamba Juice, or The Coffee Society. He believed there would be other theaters in Cupertino within a couple of years, and he felt that Andronico's would bring new life to the center. James said she would also support the center. She did not feel that the council had anything to say about whether the theater would stay or not because that is a market driven issue. There are other creative ways to create family and community events, such as the Free Shakespeare in the Park each summer. The question is whether this development is good for the community. James moved to adopt a negative declaration. Bumett seconded, and the motion carried 5-0. James moved to adopt Resolution No. 6034 approving the application per Planning Commission Res. No. 6034, with the following amendments: Condition 8 amended to say that applicant shall provide additional landscaping, lighting, and tables to encourage pedestrian access on the southern side subject to the approval of the Planning Director; and condition 25, regarding crosswalk improvements, amended to say that the applicant will be responsible for fees in the amount of 25% of the total cost for the Mary Avenue mid-block crosswalk improvements, to a maximum of $40,000. PUBLIC HEARINGS Mayor Statton reordered the agenda to discuss Item 22B first. 22B. Hotel - Kimpton Hotel and Restaurant Group, Lot 6, Tract 7953, (comer of Stevens Creek and De Anza Boulevards), APN 369-01-037. Applications 2-GPA-99, 4-EXC-00, 5-U-00, and 8-EA-99. Request to consider' a General Plan amendment to exceed the allowed height of 75 feet; a Heart of the City Specific Plan amendment and exception to exceed the 40 foot height limit and to allow hotel use; and a use permit to construct a new 224 room, 130,580 square foot hotel on a vacant parcel. A Negative Declaration recommended, and this item is recommended for approval. Continuedfrorn June 5. City Planner Ciddy Wordell reviewed the staff report regarding the proposed hotel. It will have a restaurant/bar, conference room, board room, 224 guest rooms, a parking garage, and shared parking with the adjacent office building. She discussed the design changes, which had evolved through several planning commission meetings, and through meetings with the city's architect, the applicant, and their architect. Burner asked if there are plans for radiant heating. Wordell said that council could add that as a condition to ensure it was included. She reviewed the results of the parking study and said that in the evening when the hotel needs 141 extra spaces, the garage will have 315 available. The busiest time will be at 11 a.m. when the hotel needs 25 extra spaces, and there are 55 available. June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 13 Valet parking will be available but staff must make sure that visitors can still choose to park their own cars. The applicant will be asked to do a study on how the parking arrangements will work. Mr. Jim Whelan, representing the Kimpton Hotel and Restaurant Group, said this will be unique, high-end landmark hotel building, and they envision that this location will be used for weekend brunches, as a starting place for community bike rides or community walks, and art in the park, as well as retirement festivities, anniversary festivities, birtt/days, and weddings. It will be a fun, destination location. Whelan said that they needed to discuss financing well over $35 million in this and conference guests. He and council for their support. issues with the council. The Kimpton Group is investing development to provide quality service for hotel, restaurant highlighted some of the design features, and thanked staff Mr. Bob Wheatly, architect, discussed the pedestrian and vehicular access. There will be sidewalks on both sides of Cali Street to allow pedestrians access off De Anza. There will also be an entrance into the main courtyard and another for drop-offnear the bar and restaurant. Not shown on this plan is a fitness center on the same level as the lower-level parking garage. In the courtyard there will be a fountain wall that is a focal point for the lower portion of the building. He described the materials, decorative lighting fixtures, stone tile flooring, and other design features. Burnett said that it is important to protect the existing trees along the edge of Armadillo Willy's. He asked for an arborist's report. Wordell said the trees belong to that restaurant, but there will be a report and recommendation as to whether the trees should be pruned back or replaced with a variety more appropriate for a narrow planting space. Whelan talked about the restaurant and said that Kuleto's would be a very good representation of what they hoped to provide in this location. He discussed other restaurants in their boutique hotels. He said that the executive chefs provide creativity and prepare the food in the restaurant, and the hotel provides support to ensure consistent quality. James said she was very excited about this hotel, which is a beautiful building. There are a number of projects coming forth over the next year or two which will define Cupertino, and this particular development and hotel will be a big part of that. This is a very large development, but it is possible to have increased density and do it beautifully in away that blends with the environment. She thought the landscaping would help to blend the park an apartment complex together. Bumett and Chang felt that the project was very well done and commended the planning commission for their work. Lowenthal congratulated them for persisting in the long process and felt this project will be a tremendous asset. Statton said that until council comes to a resolution about the funding and financing for this'project, he was not sure if he was ready to apprOve either the hotel or the apartment complex. He wanted to make it very clear that the two projects are tied together, and both should move forward with all deliberate speed. June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 14 James said she understood that intemally, between Prometheus and Kimpton, and perhaps involving the city, there are some issues to still be determined as to the possibility of some funding assistance. She felt it was time to move on the brick and mortar part of this proposal so that can proceed, and council could deal with the funding as a separate issue. Burnett said that there is a process in place and he did not think it was appropriate at this to start talking about extra city participation. Chang mentioned another situation in which there was a concern that the hotel and residential units would be disengaged from each other, and he agreed that the residential and hotel developments should be a package so that one does not proceed without the other. Wordell said that a mechanism to do that has been included, and it matches almost exactly the provision set forth for the Hilton Garden Inn and associated apartments. Lowenthal said that if council does not make a decision on the financial issue tonight, they are basically leaving it in the hands of the developer to take the risk that they will come to a later agreement. The current agreement has no financial sharing or kickback or tax allocation in it, so it seems that the developer is willing to take the risk so there's no reason for council to not move forward on it. Kilian noted that there is a provision that the hotel shall be started at the same time or prior to the apartment complex. However, the apartments can proceed earlier if they posted a million dollars, which would be forfeited in the event that the hotel did not proceed within 18 months. This is done to create separate financing mechanisms for both. 22.A. Apartments - Cupertino City Center Land (comer of Stevens Creek and De Anza Boulevards), Lot 1, Tract 7953. Applications 2-GPA-99, 3-EXC-00, 6-U-00, and 9-EA- 99. Request to consider a General Plan amendment to exceed the allowed height of 75 feet and to project into the 1:1 setback ratio from Stevens Creek Boulevard; a Heart of the City Specific Plan amendment and exception and use permit to construct a new 206-unit, 206,725 square foot multifamily residential building and 6,775 square feet of retail space on a vacant parcel. Negative Declarations are recommended. The General Plan amendment is recommended for denial. The Heart of the City Specific Plan amendment and exceptions are recommended for approval. Planner Michele Rodrignez said this item was continued from the last meeting in order to consider the adequacy of bicycle parking and public access to the podium area. Staff has added condition of approval requiring bicycle parking in front of or adjacent to the retail area. The plan already shows 30 bicycle parking spaces in the parking area, and the condition of approval would require that these be secured individual bicycle parking facilities. Rodrignez also described the two points of access to the podium area and said that the applicant is proposing gates at those locations. Another other option for council would be to require the gates be open during specific daylight hours, or to direct that there be card key access. Bumett said he was concerned about safety in the podium area, so visibility is as important as locks. Also, he preferred the stair design shown in November plans where the podium was clearly integrated into the other areas. He was also concerned about June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 15 handicapped access. James disagreed that there was a need to have the podium open because it will be the equivalent of a private yard for the people who will live there. Mr. John Moss, representing Prometheus, said that they agreed with the staff recommendation. It would meet the city goal public access, generally during daylight hours, while providing security for the residents in the evening. He said that they had looked at 13 different developments in the Silicon Valley when they were planning their property tour and all had restricted podium access 24 hours a day. He explained that the staircase design was changed so that the new fountain would not interfere with the existing fountain, and he pointed out the handicap access and said that the entire development would be compliant with handicap access requirements. Mr. Paul Lettieri, landscape architect, discussed the plans for landscaping around the stairs to the podium and the relocation of the fountain. He said that there would be barred rail fences so that pedestrians could stand four feet higher than the plaza, look down at the fountain or over to the hotel lobby, and get a sense of the area. Community Development Director Steve Piasecki clarified that the staff recommendation was for either full, unimpeded access, or for time-restricted access. Moss said these plans are consistent with the plans put forth in November in terms of podium access. He asked for clarification regarding Resolution 192, page 22-A40, maximum height. He said that the maximum height was not intended to be 75 feet, but instead to be consistent with the GP amendment, which was 108 feet. Resolution 191, policy 2-24, strategy 2, refers to the hotel file 5-U-00, but that should the apartment file. On page 22A-59, under the commercial heading, there is a reference to a two-foot retaining wall going the full length in front of the retail frontage, but it will not go the length of the frontage. Lowenthal said a gate to the podium is intimidation enough to keep people from walking in and out, whether or not it is locked at a certain a time. Moss suggested glass storefront doors and the side panels in an aluminum frame. Lowenthal said he would prefer a method that would keep the gates physically open during the day, not just unlocked. Moss said he thought that could be arranged. Viskovich said that the only issue arising out of the traffic study is the need for some work on some of the U-tums on DeAnza and on Stevens Creek at Torre, both of which can be handled through some changes in timing. Chang said he would support the gate being open during the day and closed in the evening. Bumett and Statton did not support that option. James felt it was a good compromise. Burnett said he was concerned about the appearance and how the gate changes the appearance from an integrated project to something exclusive. Statton agreed and said the project was originally described as an open project in which people could wander back and forth. Now it doesn't feel open and inviting any longer. He also agreed with Bumett's earlier comments about wanting a broader stair step. Statton also said that he was not enthused about the opening onto Stevens Creek Boulevard, and it is not going to June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 16 encourage a pedestrian walking along that street to go through the development to reach the park or the hotel. Chang said that after hearing their comments, he would support them in this position. James said she did not see any reason for people to be wandering around an apartment complex between 9:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Council members agreed to take action on the hotel project first. James moved to grant a negative declaration. Burnett seconded and the motion carried 5-0. Wordell noted that the general plan amendment is for both the hotel and apartment project. James moved to adopt Resolution 00-191 approving the general plan amendment, with the stipulation that the amendment on the apartment portion is for height, setbacks, use, and the street-to-height ratio, and on the hotel portion the amendment is for height only. Bumett seconded and the motion carried 5-0. James moved to adopt Resolution 00-193. Chang seconded and the motion carried 5-0. James moved to approve the use permit pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution No. 6033 with the addition of the radiant heating, as discussed. Bumett seconded and the motion carded 5-0. Bumett moved to grant a negative declaration for the apartment project. James seconded and the motion carried 5-0. Burnett moved Resolution No. Finding No. 4, carried 5-0. to approve the Heart of the City exception per Planning Commission 6028, and adopt Resolution No. 00-192, with an amendment to Section 2, to allow the height to exceed 75 feet. James seconded, and the motion Bumett moved to approve the use permit per staff recommendation with the provision that there shall be open access to the podium, with no gate and no door. The motion carried 4-1 with Council member James voting no. Piasecki said that the applicants for the hotel may want to proceed with the grading permit ahead of the other permits, with an understanding that there would be no vesting, and that they would hold the city harmless. If that is to take place, he would work with the city attorney to prepare an agreement. City Attorney Charles Kilian said that was acceptable if they wanted to take the risk of proceeding without the 30-day waiting period for challenges. 23. Appeal and exception to the Planning Commission's decision of May 8, 2000, regarding park fees stated in Resolution 6025: approval of Application 1-TM-00, Tentative Map to subdivide a 8,818 sq. ft. parcel into two lots at 10440 South Blaney Avenue as listed in Section III item 14 of improvement agreement in the amount of $31,500.00. Appellant: Ron Bennett. Staff stated that the matter has been resolved, and the applicant will not be required to pay park dedication fees for parcels that have existing houses on them. June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 17 24. Appeal of Planning Commission denial of Application 16-U-98, Adzich Properties -Use permit to demolish an existing house and construct four single-family detached residences on a net 12,480 square foot lot located at 10216 Pasadena Avenue. Appellants: Radovan and Helen Adzich. Continuance requested to July 17. This item was continued to July 17. 25. Public hearings regarding permit parking. · Student parking on Hyannisport Drive, Dolores Avenue, and McClellan Road · Permit parking on McClellan Road between Byme Avenue and Madrid Road, Resolution No. 00-194 Viskovich said there has been a new application since the hearings about Hyannisport and Dolores, and the request is to prohibit parking on a portion of McClellan Road. As in the other locations, the residents have been impacted by over-parking in front of their homes. Another issue for discussion is whether to implement student parking permits on Hyannisport and Dolores, and if council chooses to approve the parking restriction, it would also apply to McClellan Road. He highlighted the steps being taken by the Fremont Union High School District, including the addition of 32 stalls as a part of the modernization program. Later when some portable classrooms are removed, there will be 115 more spaces than when the modernization program began. They are also committed to doing a comprehensive study on-site for additional parking areas. They will add stalls where possible, and evaluate programs to encourage student carpooling and bicycling. They will also evaluate the possibility of a subsidized bus program, in which subsidized passes may be offered to students or faculty at Monta Vista High School. Mr. Gene Longinetti, representing the Fremont Union High School District, said that on May 1 the city council voted to implement permit parking immediately, and to implement a proposed pilot parking program developed by the parking task force committee for the fall semester in 2000. They also asked that to include residents fi'om Hyarmisport and Dolores Avenues, and said they would work to develop specific guidelines for implementing the pilot program. On May 12, the task force committee met at Monta Vista High School with residents Sandy Ravizza, Jackie Kreitzer, and Denni.'s Yao representing Hyannisport, and Victoria Gomez and David Chen representing Dolores. The committee met again on May 31, and Mr. Kawasaki from Hyannisport Drive also attended. Mr. Longinetti said that the school district would strengthen its commitment to encourage additional carpooling, bicycling and use of public transportation as a way to minimize traffic and parking on the school site. Next year, Monta Vista High School will work with the city to implement a $10,000 grant to increase safe bicycling routes throughout the city. Also, the city and district staff have begun research and implementation of traffic demand management system. The district is pleased to announce that recent modifications at the site have resulted in parking for an additional 32 vehicles, even after 93 spaces were lost due to installation of portable classrooms. He thanked the council, the community and all the members of the task force for their time, hard work and commitment to this process. June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 18 Ms. Allison Weeks, a student at Monta Vista High School, said she had been working with three other students to help create, adopt and revise the pilot program for Monta Vista's parking problem. They have met with residents of Hyannisport and Dolores, the vice principal, the student conduct liaison, and representatives from the City of Cupertino and the Fremont Union High School District. They have drawn up a guide as to how the pilot program will work. In addition to resolving the parking issue, they plan to find more efficient ways to get many students to school. The guidelines say that students will not be included in the pilot plan unless they live outside of a radius at least a half mile, in the hope this will increase the number of students who walk to school every day. Although the pilot program may not be perfect, the students at Monta Vista are committed to meeting over the summer and next fall to continually improve the program. Ms. Victoria Gomez, resident of Dolores Avenue, said when she originally spoke to council she was very frustrated about this problem, but now she and the other residents on her street are happy with the results. The residents, students, and school are working to solve the problem. She said two students have been assigned parking in front of her house and it is working out well. She urged council to adopt the pilot program. Mr. Chart, 21982 McClellan Road, said he was not familiar with this pilot program because McClellan Avenue residents were left out of a lot of the discussions. Overall, they are disappointed in the lack of consideration of the parking problem in the neighborhood and he did not think the student permit program was a long-term solution. Mr. Chan shared some photographs showing the parking problem at his home. He said there is also a safety issue on that road because people speed around the curb. They asked to have speed bumps put in but that request was denied. Mr. Kawasaki, resident of Hyannisport Drive, said there are already 30 cars parked there from the high school, and if more are added it will be even worse. He has shown a video of the parking problem, and he and the residents strongly opposed to this pilot program. People who were assigned to other streets are still parking on Hyannisport. Viskovich said that he thought Mr. Kawasaki may referring to existing visitors parking, which is different from the student parking program. Mr. Kawasaki said that to make this successful, it will require an extra effort from the city, students, and school to monitor the program. Some residents may be intimidated by having to confront students who were not parking in the right location. Lowenthal agreed that the city must be actively involved. He did not think that further permit parking should be allowed on McClellan at this time. They have not been involved in the pilot student parking program, and it doesn't take into account the new student spaces. He felt the pilot program should be tested first before extending permit parking. Viskovich explained that the speed bump request on McClellan was denied because it is a collector street and it has to meet certain criteria in the neighborhoods. Bumett said he was in favor of changing the standard, because any street that has people living on it deserves protection of the residents' safety. June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 19 Chang said that a meeting, or letter, or both should be arranged for the residents so they all know what will be entailed in the pilot project. If there is a violation of the program, people should understand who they should contact, whether that is the high school, the sheriff, etc. Viskovich said that a followup report is planned for February of 2001. James commended the committee on their work. She felt that McClellan Road residents were entitled to some parking protection. She did not think the permitting issue is the ultintate solution and the city should have further talks with the high school district about who is responsible for enforcement. Viskovich said that there is a petition from the residents of McClellan requesting permit parking, although they do not appear to want the student program. Bumett said that since summer has arrived, and there will be extra parking spaces available next year, he would suggest no change for McClellan Road at this time, but look at the situation when school resumes in the fall to see if they still have a problem. Lowenthal moved that permit parking not be instituted on McClellan Road at this time, but that council reconsider that when school is back in session. Burnett seconded and the motion carried 5-0. Bumett moved to institute the student parking program on Hyannisport and Dolores Avenues. Lowenthal seconded and the motion carried 5-0. PLANNING APPLICATIONS UNFINISHED BUSINESS 27. First reading of Ordinance No. 1851: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 11.24.150 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Relating to Establishment of Parking Prohibition on the North Side of Bollinger Road From De Anza Boulevard West + 546 Feet." The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. Bumett moved and James seconded to read the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the first reading thereof. Motion carried 5-0. ORDINANCES 28. Second reading and enactment of Ordinance No. 1849: "An Ordinance of thc City Council of the City of Cupertino Prezoning an Existing Single-Family Residential Lot Located at 21095 Grenola Drive to Pre RI-10 (single family residential) zoning district." The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. Burnett moved and James seconded to read the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the second reading thereof. Motion carried 5-0. Burnett moved and James seconded to enact Ordinance No. 1849. Motion carried 5-0. June 19, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 20 STAFF REPORTS - None COUNCIL REPORTS Lowenthal reported that the Library Joint Powers Authority joined a lawsuit against the State of California with the County of Sonoma to end the Education Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) shift. Bumett said the mayor and one of the city council members of Saratoga met with Harry Yahada, who is in charge of this Caltrans district, and Sen. Byron Sher to talk about freeway noise implementation. There was clear direction given to Caltrans to obtain studies as to whether the ground concrete would work, and if not they would put an asphalt overlay on Highway 85.sant~ Clara County Emergency Preparedness Commission CLOSED SESSION At 10:57 p.m. council recessed to an urgent closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1), Significant eXposure to litigation - Paul Fong vs. City of Cupertino. At 11:20 p.m., council reconvened. The City Attorney said that he had been advised to follow certain strategies that are confidential. ADJOURNMENT At 11:20 p.m., the meeting was adjourned. The meeting of July 3 has been cancelled and the next regular meeting will be July 17. Kimbefly Smith, City Clerk DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL - Regular Meeting CUPERTINO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - Regular Meeting Monday, July 17, 2000 CITY COUNCIL MEETING PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 6:45 p.m. Vice Mayor James called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, Tone Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL 10300 City Council members present: Vice-Mayor Sandra James, and Council members Don Bumett, Michael-Chang, and Richard Lowenthal. Council members absent: Mayor John Statton Staff present: City Manager Dave Knapp, City Attorney Charles Kilian, Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood,' Community Development Director Steve Piasecki, Public Information Officer Donna Krey, Public Works Director Bert Viskovich, Recreation Supervisor Christine Hanel, Associate Planner Colin Jung, and City Clerk Kimberly Smith. CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS James introduced the new City Manager, David Knapp. 1. Report fi.om Godbe Research and Analysis on 2000 Community Satisfaction Survey. Dr. Amy Flower, Brian Godbe, and Tim McClamey gave a PowerPoint presentation highlighting their findings and presented council members with a synopsis of the results. She said that the survey was done by making random telephone calls to 400 adults. This was a similar to the methodology used in the survey conducted in 1998. Chang asked for statistics on crime rate and ethnicity. Council received the report. POSTPONEMENTS The City Clerk announced that Item 11, Adzich Properties, application 16-U-98, was withdrawn; Item No. 7 was amended to show correct addresses; and item No. 18 was continued. She clarified that the public heating on the Redevelopment Agency public hearing on Valleo was closed on June 19, and no further public input would be received on that item. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None July 17, 2000 Cupertino City Council and Page 2 Cupertino Redevelopment Agency ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None. CONSENT CALENDAR Bumett moved to adopt the consent calendar with corrections to Item #7. Chang seconded and the motion carried 4-0. 2. Minutes: June 5 regular meeting and June 15 regular adjourned meeting. Accounts payable: June 16, June 23, and June 30, 2000 - Resolutions 00-198, 00-199 and 00-200. 4. Payroll: June 23, and July 7, 2000 - Resolutions 00-201 and 00-202. 5. Treasurer's Budget Report, May 2000. o Authorize City Attorney to defend Cupertino Community Services with respect to a potential claim related to administration of the City's housing program, Resolution 00- 203. Make determinations and approve the reorganization of territories designated: (a) "Upland Way 00-03," approximately 2.836 acres located on the north side of Grenola Drive between Flora Vista Avenue and Ann Arbor Drive; Liou and Chen (APN 326-28-009.), Resolution 00-204. This item was corrected to read "located on the west side of Upland Way between Rainbow drive and Upland Way; Wang (APN 366~03-Ol l) " (b) "Grenola Drive 00-02," approximately 0.215 acre located on the north side of San Femando Avenue between Byme Avenue and Orange Avenue; Wang and Yen (APN 357-15-048), Resolution 00-205. This item was corrected to read "located on the north side of Grenola Way between Flora Vista Avenue and Ann arbor Drive; Liou and Chen (APN 326-28-009)" (c) "Alcazar Avenue 00-08," approximately 0.183 acre located on the south side of Alcazar Avenue between Orange Avenue and Imperial Avenue; approximately 0.183 acre, Bruffy and Eastman (APN 357-19-012), Resolution 00-206. Change order No. 4, Cupertino Senior Center Expansion, Project 99-9210, McCrary Construction Company (agreement 00-004), Resolution 00-207. Accept (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) of municipal improvements (no documentation required): Sufinder Singh, 10633 Johansen, APN 375-37-059 Alan and Cheung Meekie Y. Yuen, 22277 Crescent Road, APN 326-16-084 Orchard Court, 10036 Crescent Road, Lot 5, APN 326-17-031 CTL Engineering, 20697 Garden Gate Drive, APN 326-33-017 Peter Tan, 10472 Johnson Avenue, APN 375-26-043 Sandra Lee, 19010 Bamhart, APN 375-37-041 July 17, 2000 Cupertino City Council and Cupertino Redevelopment Agency Page 3 (g) (h) (i) Rick Simonini, Jack Goodman and Marilyn Goodman, 22032 San Femando Court, APN 357-12-015 Qingyu Li and Xianing Zhu, 1554 Santa Lucia Road, APN 342-16-040 (Grading only) Partial acceptance of various O'Brien Group projects at Oak Valley: · On-site grading-Unit 5, Area 1, Tract 9077; Unit 1, Area 2, Tract 9054;Unit 2, Tract 9075; Unit 3, Neighborhood 4, Tract 9076 · Park Improvements-Unit 1, Neighborhood 2, Tract 9054 · Joint Trench Improvements-Unit 2, Neighbor-hood 3, Tract 9075; Unit 4, Neighborhood 1, Tract 9077; Unit 5, Neighborhood 1, Tract 9078; Unit 1, Neighborhood 2, Tract 9054; Neighborhood 4, Tract 9076 10. Quitclaim deed, Hugh Freeman Jackson Sr., Trustee Of the Jackson Family Trust, Children's Trust, created under the Agreement dated December 22, 1988, APN 326-50- 063, Resolution No. 00-208. Vote Council members Ayes: Burnett, Chang, James, and Lowenthal Noes: None Absent: Statton Abstain: None ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR - None. JOINT MEETING - CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ROLL CALL At 7:20 p.m. Vice-Mayor James called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California. City Council members present: Vice-Mayor Sanclra James, and Council members Don Bumett, Michael Chang, and Richard Lowenthal. Council members absent: Mayor John Statton. Redevelopment Agency members present: Vice-Chair Sandra James, and Agency members Don Bumett, Michael Chang, and Richard Lowenthal. Redevelopment Agency members absent: Chairman John Statton. Staff present: David Knapp, Acting City Manager, Carol Atwood City Administrative Services Director and Finance Director of the Agency; Charles Kilian, City Attorney and General Counsel to the Agency, Community Development Director Steve Piasecki, City Planner Ciddy Wordell, Public Information Officer Donna Krey, Public Works Director Bert Viskovich, and Kimberly Smith, City Clerk and Secretary to the Agency. July 17, 2000 Page 4 Cupertino City Council and Cupertino Redevelopment Agency Redevelopment Attorney for the City and Agency: Nicole Murphy. Environmental consultant: John Wagstaff JOINT PUBLIC HEARING A. Minutes of the June 19, 2000, Redevelopment Agency meeting. Burnett moved to approve the minutes of the June 19, 2000, Redevelopment Agency meeting. Chang seconded and the motion carried 4-0 with Statton absent. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING Be Joint public hearing of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency on the proposed redevelopment plan for the Cupertino Vallco Redevelopment Project. Public Hearing closed on June 19. Ms. Nicole Murphy, consulting attorney, said that the public hearing was closed after receiving testimony on June 19, but two items were continued to tonight's meeting. She said the environmental impact report identifies mitigation measures that will eliminate or lessen all of the significant effects of the project, with two exceptions. The first exception is the cumulative impacts on the Wolfe Road-Pruneridge Avenue intersection, and the second exception is regional air quality emissions. As a result, the resolution contains a statement of overriding considerations by which the Agency finds that the benefits of adoption of ihe project outweigh these significant effects. Also, attached to the resolution is a mitigation monitoring program. The second item for consideration is a resolution finding that the use of tax increment funds by the Agency outside the project area will be of benefit to the project area. The record contains information indicating that the project is essentially the revitalization of Vallco. Affordable housing outside the project area will serve the employees of Vallco. NEW BUSINESS Co Agency certifies and makes findings based upon consideration of the Final Environmental Impact Report, Resolution No. RA-00-06. Continued from June 19. Ms. Murphy said that the statement of overriding considerations finds that although the EIR concludes that regional air quality emissions remain a significant unmitigated effect of adoption of the project, the 'benefits outweigh those effects. Mr. Wagstaff, environmental consultant, said that the EIR looked at seven criteria regarding' pollutant categories weighted upon the guidelines of the Bay Area Air Quality Management July 17, 2000 Page 5 Cupertino City Council and Cupertino Redevelopment Agency District. Two of those seven categories were significant and could not be mitigated, nitrates of oxygen and particulate. In the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, virtually any commercial project over 100,00 square feet, or any other type of general construction that will have 2,000 trips per day, would have this kind of unmitigable air quality impact. Chag..g moved to adopt Resolution No. RA-00-06. Lowenthal seconded and the motion carried 4-0 with Statton absent. Agency finds that the use of taxes allocated from the Project for the purpose of improving and increasing the community's supply of low- and moderate-income housing outside the Project Area will be of benefit to the Project, Resolution No. RA-00-07. Continued from June 19. Chang moved to adopt Resolution No. RA-00-07. Lowenthal seconded and the motion carried 4-0 with Statton absent. ADJOURNMENT OF THE AGENCY At 7:32 p.m., the Redevelopment Agency adjourned and the City Council meeting continued. Fo Go CITY COUNCIL MEETING City Council certifies and makes findings based upon consideration of the final Environmenta[Impact Report, Resolution No. 00-187. Continued from June 19. Chang moved to adopt Resolution No. 00-187. Lowenthal seconded and the motion carried 4-0 with Statton absent. City Council adopts findings in response to written objections on adoption of the Redevelopment Plan for the Cupertino Vallco Redevelopment Project, Resolution 00- 197. Lowenthal moved to adopt Resolution No. 00-197. Burnett seconded and the motion carried 4-0 with Statton absent. City Council finds that the use of taxes allocated from the Project for the purpose of improving and increasing the community's supply of low- and moderate-income housing outside the Project Area will be of benefit to the project, Resolution No. 00-188. Continued from June 19. Lowenthal moved to adopt Resolution No. 00-188. Chang seconded and the motion carried 4-0 with Statton absent. City Council approves and adopts the Redevelopment Plan, first reading of Ordinance No. 1850: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino, California, July 17, 2000 Page 7 Cupertino City Council and Cupertino Redevelopment Agency James shared the concerns expressed by Lowenthal. She said that Council had made a promise to the community, and other developers have been held accountable. Bumett agreed that the houses are very large, and there is linkage between price and affordability. Lowenthal suggested a large common area. James said she could support more density if there was a benefit to the community, but she did not see it in this case. She suggested that the staff continue to work with the applicant, and that this item be continued for one month. Burnett agreed, but said that council should be clear about what they want, since this project was begun before the new FAR was adopted. Lowenthal said an average FAR of 45 pement for the whole development would be okay. Bumett asked that the comer building be made smaller. Michael Aminian, representing the applicant, said they have cleared four gas stations in town. This project took two years until it was acceptable to the Planning Commission and staff, and the applicant hoped to get the demolition permit in the next two weeks. He agreed that they will go back to work to reduce the FAR to 45 percent. Lowenthal moved to continue this item to August 21, and to ask the applicant to work with staff to create another plan with an average 45 percent FAR for the entire project. Bumett seconded and the motion carried 4-0, with Statton absent. PLANNING APPLICATIONS 13. Report to City Council from the Planning Commission regarding a use permit to demolish two single-family dwellings and construct eight townhomes totaling 13,686 square feet on a 23,170 square foot lot (applications 16-U-99, 31-EA-99). Stanley Wang; 10060 S. Stelling Road and 10051 Bianchi Way (APN's 359-07-003, 359-07-004, and 359-07-015). A negative declaration is recommended and this item is recommended for approval. Planner Vera Gil gave the staff report. Piasecki said that since this lot is literally one lot south of Stevens Creek, it seemed that it was not as necessary to include pedestrian access because the small benefit of including it would create many more problems in the project. James said that Capt. JeffMiles, Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office, felt that this was a safe solution. Lowenthal said this was a good solution. He would have preferred pedestrian access, and although staff tried to make that happen, there was too much compromise. Bumett said this project is incompatible here. It has a high FAR, but no limit. Council was granting a lot of exceptions, so he was reluctant to go without pedestrian access. July 17, 2000 Page 8 Cupertino City Council and Cupertino Redevelopment Agency James said she was pleased with the project, and was willing to allow higher density because it fills a niche for needed housing. Chang moved to grant a Negative Declaration. Lowenthal seconded and the motion carried 3-1 with Bumett voting no and Statton absent. Chang moved to approve the application per Planning Commission Resolution 6041. Lowenthal seconded and the motion carried 3-1 with Bumett voting no and Statton absent. 14. Use permit to demolish a restaurant and construct a 47,000 square foot, 77-room hotel. Applications 01-U-00, 02-EA-00; Pinn Brothers (The Adobe Inn Hotel); 20128 Stevens Creek Boulevard, APN 369-03-001. A mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended, and this item is recommended for approval. Associate Planner Colin Jung showed the proposed pedestrian easement access for Biltmore residents, with a gate between the properties (not shown on plans). He said the Biltmore residents were not yet contacted about this option, but council may want to reserve it as an option in the future. Community Development Director Steve Piasecki talked about the Heart of the City Specific Plan exceptions, and said the height exception is less noticeable and won't be objectionable. The side setback exceptions were relatively minor, especially with the landscape buffer. These are comfortable exceptions that won't undermine the intent of the specific plan. Mr. Greg Pinn, Pinn Bros., said they were the building owners. They will hire a management company to run the boutique-style hotel, which will have a finish similar to the Ernst and Young building also located on Stevens Creek Boulevard. He discussed the amenities that would be offered. Mr. George Monk, 19985 Price Avenue, said the development fi.om hotels and Vallco will create more Waffle, including taxis and delivery tracks, but no studies have been done on the impact on residential streets, which included Blaney, Rodrigues, and Tone. He felt a baseline study should be done now, and Council should treat traffic impacts in a comprehensive way, perhaps even asking for funding fi.om the developers. Bumett said there should be good-quality, large-canopy trees over the emergency access, and he did not find palms incompatible with the Heart of the City plan. He did like the pedestrian access fi.om Biltmore. Lowenthal said he liked the extra building width to keep the garage entrance fi.om being overwhelming, and had no problem with palms and flowering pear trees. He was also coneemed about the cumulative effect of traffic on feeder streets. July 17, 2000 Page 9 Cupertino City Council and Cupertino Redevelopment Agency Viskovich explained that the general plan takes into account the traffic impacts of all development. The individual review is to hone in on any operational changes that the general plan didn't cover, such as driveway access, queuing, etc. As long as the classification of the intersection does not drop below a level D, then it is consistent with the general plan's total picture. Piasecki noted that a number of developments that will be coming before council would replace existing buildings, which could have the potential to become uses that are less desirable. Hotels are good because they generate off-peak traffic and fairly low rates. PJ Mulligan's is tearing down an older shopping center that doesn't generate as much as a newer center, but they're offsetting some of the existing uses in this case. The increment then is smaller than if they were starting fi.om bare ground and going up. James was in favor of the development, and liked the idea of canopy trees over the emergency access. She did like the palm trees in combination with the flowering pears, as well as a walk through to the Biltmore Apartments. Bumett moved to grant a mitigating Negative Declaration. Chang seconded and the motion carried 4-0 with Statton absent. Burnett moved to grant development exceptions to the Heart of the City specific plan for maximum building heights, side setbacks, and rear setback, file number 06-EXC-00, per Planning Commission Resolution 6043. Lowenthal seconded and the motion carried 4-0 with Statton absent. Burnett moved to approve the use permit, file number 01-U-00 per Planning Commission Resolution No. 6042. Lowenthal seconded and the motion carried 4-0 with Statton absent. UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None. NEW BUSINESS 15. Request fi.om Stephen C. Porter for a permit to use sound amplifying equipment in the amphitheater at Memorial Park on Sunday, July 30, 2000, for a wedding ceremony. Staff recommends denial of request. Recreation Supervisor Christine Hanel presented staff's recommendation to deny the request. Stephen Porter, 14395 Sycamore Avenue, San Martin, said he was a former resident of Cupertino and his children had frequently played in Memorial Park. He was appealing the city manager's denial of a permit to allow brief use of a small sound system at his son's wedding at Memorial Park on July 30. He said the noise level present in the amphitheater is such that it was unlikely that their guests would be able to hear the ceremony unless they amplify the voices of the judge, bride and groom. Also to keep costs down, they proposed using appropriate recorded wedding music. When his wife July 17, 2000 Page 10 Cupertino City Council and Cupertino Redevelopment Agency applied for a permit to use the amphitheater, she was not given an application form, although the municipal code specifies that there should be an application form, which should provide for any request to use amplified sound. The park regulations sent with the permit made no mention of any restrictions on the use of amplified sound. They mailed the invitations specifying Memorial Park amphitheater as the location of the wedding ceremony, then later became aware of the restrictions on the use of amplified sound. They applied to the city manager for an exclusive use permit as provided in the municipal code, but it was denied, although none of the conditions for denial specified in the municipal code appeared to exist. He said if the council grants the appeal, he would personally ensure that the sound level during the wedding is carefully controlled to be no louder than necessary and, insofar as possible, confined to the amphitheater seating area only, and only during the ceremony. Hanel said when the applicant requested use of the amphitheater, it was conveyed to that person that electricity was not available. The only exceptions to that policy are for non- profit organizations with an exclusive use permit. She said that when the permit is sent to the applicant, they are given a pamphlet that says amplified music is not allowed in the amphitheater. They are also given a list of park regulations, but it does-not refer to amplified music. Generally the issue does not arise because it is not an amenity that is provided. Chang and Burnett supported the staff recommendation. Lowenthal felt that the list of park regulations should specify that no amplification of sound or music is allowed. He did not think that park users should have to draw that implication. He thought the applicant should be given the benefit of the doubt and his appeal should be supported. James supported staff's recommendation. She apologized to the applicant for the confusion, but believed that it was a question that could have been asked up fi.ont. She did not think the city could grant an exception in this case and then not expect other users to want it. Chang moved to deny the appeal. Burner seconded and the motion carried 3-1 with Lowenthal voting no and Statton absent. 16. Set application deadlines and interview dates for an unscheduled vacancy on the Parks and Recreation Commission. James acknowledged the death of Terry Cook, who had served on the city's Parks and Recreation Commission. Council concurred to set the application deadline for August 23, and to conduct interviews on Tuesday, September 5, at 5:00 p.m. July 17, 2000 Page 11 Cupertino City Council and Cupertino Redevelopment Agency 17. Designate voting delegate for League of California Cities Annual Conference None of the four council members present had plans to attend this conference. They concurred to ask Mayor Statton to be the voting delegate if he would be in attendance. 18. Clarify council intent regarding funding (loan vs. grant) awarded to Cupertino Community Services (CCS) for affordable housing project. This item was continued. 19. Nonpoint Source Pollution Program, Assessment of Fees for Storm Drainage Purposes - the request is to continue the existing assessment for Nonpoint Source without increasing the fees, Resolution 00-209. Bert Viskovich, Public Works Director, reviewed the staff report and said the staff recommendation was to continue the assessment on the same basis. Lowenthal moved to adopt Resolution 00-209. Bumett seconded and the motion carded 4-0 with Statton absent. 20. Set date for adjourned Council meeting: (a) Award Stevens Canyon Road Widening project (b) Public hearing regarding assessment of fees for annual weed' abatement program (private parcels). Council concurred to set the date of Thursday, July 27, at 6:45 p.m. for these two items. ORDINANCES 21. Second reading and enactment of Ordinance No. 1851: "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 11.24.150 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Relating to Establishment of Parking Prohibition on the North Side of Bollinger Road From De Anza Boulevard West + 546 Feet." The city clerk read the title of the ordinance. Bumett moved that Ordinance 1851 be read by title only and that the city clerk's reading constitute the second reading thereof. Chang seconded and the motion carried 4-0 with Statton absent. Burnett moved to enact Ordinance 1851. Chang seconded and the motion carried 4-0 with Statton absent. July 17, 2000 Cupertino City Council and Cupertino Redevelopment Agency Page 12 STAFF REPORTS 22. Status report regarding construction at Biltmore Apartments. Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director, reviewed the staff report. Barbara Langworthy, 20030 Rodrigues Avenue, #K, said that when she moved into the Biltmore apartments she was asked to sign an asbestos agreement, which stated that asbestos is safe as long as it's undisturbed. For the last five days, pounding fi-om the construction has been so violent it disturbed ceiling asbestos. Each day she would call the office and ask for cleanup by staff with the special vacuum cleaner. There is only one vacuum available, with a very small opening on the hose, and it cannot adequately clean the entire carpet. She said there is no systematic procedure to make this a safe process for residents. Her other concern was about tufts of exposed fiberglass, which are blowing around, covering her patio, etc. Also, she said in June she observed saw blades coming through her wall, with no warning given about the seismic retrofit that was taking place. David Woo, Lake Biltmore Resident Association, said he moved his family out last weekend to protect them fi.om what he had observed happening when construction began in May. Some of the things he had seen were broken ceilings, cuts into the windows, inadequate protection fi.om asbestos, and many people pleading with the management. He was concerned about asbestos fibers remaining in his clothing, carpets, and furniture. Some people have found their doOrs boarded up because there is no footing fi.om the front door to the staii's, or sliding glass doors boarded up for two weeks. Oleg Kolosov, Ph.D., 10129 S. Blaney Avenue, gA, Lake Biltrnore Resident Association, described his experience. When renovation began, the residents were not really told what would happen. When he was preparing to move into the apartment in September, he was asked to sign the asbestos agreement two weeks after he paid the deposit. Then the construction began, with noise, shaking of the building, and asbestos coming out. Mr. Kolosov said he has seen asbestos handling done in other countries and the method used here was definitely a violation of the code. Also, the actual workers were without any respirators. He said the noise is terrible and begins at 7:30 in the morning. Faith Miller, Lake Biltmore Resident Association, said she did not understand how anyone authorized or permitted a construction site over the heads of residents. This has been the most misrepresented, misspoken, ill-advised project she had ever seen. She wanted council to show up at Lake Biltmore, or for the building inspector to do more than have the nails swept fi-om the sidewalk. There are flying boards, broken glass, and ladders. This council has a responsibility not to be misled any longer. There was an original group of 47 residents who were preparing to file a class action lawsuit, and that number has almost quadrupled. She remarked on one pregnant woman who was boarded in for nearly 30 days when the temperature reached as high as 109 degrees. July 17, 2000 Page 13 Cupertino City Council and Cupertino Redevelopment Agency Sukanya Sreehari, 20020 Rodrigues Avenue, #6E, said he had experienced the same problems the other speakers have discussed. His sinus and asthma problems have been aggravated and his physician has told him he should not live in a construction zone. His medical tests confirm that he has been exposed to high levels of dust, and is now being given high doses of medication. Naveen Saxena, 20050 Rodrigues Avenue, #E, said she did not believe the situation was being dealt with reasonably. She felt they should finish one building before beginning work on another. She did not know the whole story about the asbestos concern, but felt that building inspectors should inspect the situation and produce a report for the people, if nothing else. At least it would provide ammunition to the residents to sue if things were not done properly. Ajay Sharma, 20020 Rodrigues Avenue #6H, said that one day her balcony was gone without any prior notice and her 8-year old child could have stepped out into a 20-foot drop. She had been told that all the laundry facilities would be removed except for six located by the office. The renters are paying for amenities which are no longer available, including the lakes, and there has been no compensation or even sympathy. There is zero percent vacancy in this area, so there is nowhere else to go. She came from India, and this country is supposed to have great human rights and human values, but she doesn't see it here. Paul McKennon, 20090 Rodrigues, said he had worked in construction for over 20 years. He saw many safety violations that have since been addressed, probably due to so many complaints by the tenants. He has been relocated to a different unit because of the asbestos exposure in his own apartment when construction workers broke through the ceiling with a Skil saw, then tried to clean up the asbestos with a regular vacuum instead of a hepavac. He has received only $500 for the loss of his bed, carpet, furniture, sheets, comforters etc., and has yet to be reimbursed for three weeks in a hotel. Tonight he found asbestos sheet rock from the exterior of the building sitting in a large pile on the ground beneath his new unit. He knows that appropriate asbestos abatement has not happened here, and discussed how his personal items were handled. Lorraine De Souza, 20030 Rodrigues Avenue, said she spoke with great trepidation because one year ago when they tried to hold a residents meeting, they were threatened with eviction. She is living here on a dependent visa and cannot afford to go to court. She said her building recently had work done on the siding and there were 25 nails sticking out of the entire length of the window sill near the location where her daughter's high chair usually sits. Her carpet is littered with sawdust and asbestos. The workers attack one building, then move on, and interior carpentry work is not finished for weeks. She discussed other safety hazards on the way to the laundry room, including sheets of metal, ladders, and loose boards. She said she comes from India, a Third World country, and if this happened in her own country she would be furious. She was dumfounded to imagine that it could happen in America. July 17, 2000 Page 14 Cupertino City Council and Cupertino Redevelopment Agency Nikanjan Maka, 10129 S. Blaney Avenue, selected Cupertino based on a reputation of the city for being well mn, with good schools. She selected Lake Biltmore because of the tranquility of the lakes. The lake has now vanished without notice, there are no longer laundry facilities close by, and there's no place for her children to play. She said that council should not allow this injustice to be happening. Raju Shah, 20050 Rodrigues Avenue gA, Lake Biltmore Residents Association, said when he signed his lease he was not told that construction would be taking place shortly. He wanted to move out and was told he would have to pay the remaining six months on his lease, or find someone else to move in. There have been times when they had no walkway to the laundry facilities. He invited the council members to stay at his home for one or two nights to see how serious the problem is. He asked to move into another apartment that had been renovated and was told that none are ready. However, there are two apartments across from him that were just renovated and rented out. Whenever the residents complain they are told" if you don't like it, just get out." Marymoore Patterson, 10139 S. Blaney Avenue, said her building was the first to be hit before they had a plan for the asbestos. They knocked out windows and walls, and her unit was littered with insulation fibers and dust. She said an independent test done for asbestos showed a sample taken fi.om her carpet contained 14 percent asbestos. For six weeks there have been nails in her kitchen where her daughter could have scraped herself. There are nails everywhere, and crumbling sheetrock throughout her home. She has come home to find someone on standing on her balcony, and people come in and out of her home with no notice. Recently while walking through the grounds, her daughter picked up a board laying against the construction fence. The fence would have fallen on her daughter's head if a man hadn't been nearby to catch it. She said it is shocking that these things are happening with residents living inside the homes, and the management is not offering any relocation or compensation. Instead, they offer ways to move out, which is really a form of eviction. Most people here either cannot move out or do not want to. Marie Gatto said her family owns several units across thc street fi.om thc Biltmorc apartments. Her elderly father has filll time caregivers 24 hours a days. The other day one of the caregivers was appalled when she saw pink insulation coming off the building and she was threatening to quit. The insulation is not being removed in a safe matter, and the wind was blowing it all over. James closed the public hearing and asked for a response from staff. She noted that the e-mails fi.om residents have been forwarded to both the owners of the project and the city planning commission, and the inspectors have been on the premises regularly. Joe Antonucci, Building Official, said that permits for asbestos removal are issued by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. The contact person is Sharon Gee, at (415) 749-4606. He said it is a very serious issue with a specialized area of mitigation. If the July 17, 2000 Page 15 Cupertino City Council and Cupertino Redevelopment Agency city inspectors see an asbestos problem on site, they contact the asbestos company working there to address their concerns. The city inspectors will do whatever it takes to ensure safety of the residents. Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director, said the inspectors have been focusing on anything that might inhibit safe passage. When they have found problems, such as nails, they were brought to the attention of the construction management in the area at that time and immediately cleaned up. If anyone sees a problem, they can call the building inspectors directly. Joe Antonucci will be personally involved, and Inspector Jerry Brager is out there several times a day. If there is a problem that is downright dangerous, the project can be shut down, but that is usually a temporary solution. He thought it was a good idea to require that one building be done at a time. James said she would like to meet with the property owners about that change in procedure, and would like to have a copy of the videotape of this meeting sent to the property owners. Piasecki said that he would make a tape available and ask them to respond to the individual complaints that had been raised this evening. Antonucci said that the city is very concerned about the residents' safety and they have responded to every call. However, he has not been invited inside the units to see the problems occurring there. Residents may call him directly if they would like him to look inside their apartments to make an analysis of the situation. His office number is 777- 3205. He noted that Inspector Brager walks the site at least two times a day. If they are missing problems, they need the residents to point them out. They're trying to be as picky as possible, but th6y can only write up problems that they have personally seen. Piasecki stated that the city attorney may want to respond regarding the legal rights of the owner to renovate their own property, but staff would much prefer the people were not inside the units at the time. When they raised this issue with the Prometheus Group, there was equal concern about displacing a lot of people to proceed with the project. He felt that the Prometheus Group should look for opportunities to get people out of the construction zone. The bottom line is that these buildings must be renovated at some time, and it will be disruptive. City Attorney Kilian said other cities have rules and regulations regarding building permits and the ability to regulate the occupancy during construction. The problem is that it varies fi.om case to case. He was not aware of any cities in Santa Clara County that have such regulations. It may be possible under the health and safety powers of the city to adopt such regulations regarding renovation of occupied residential building. James said the city is interested in the concerns of the residents, and the inspectors have been making spot inspections over and above what they would normally do. The job has been permitted and is legal fi.om the city's perspective, and the city is in contact with the owner. Unfortunately, the problems have not yet been resolved so the matter will be further pursued. July 17, 2000 Cupertino City Council and Cupertino Redevelopment Agency Page 16 Bumett said there is no excuse for the things that are happening to these people. It seems the property owner is trying to do this as cheaply as possible. Council must see how to change the process to reduce these events to an acceptable level, and then set in place new regulations so that it never happens again. Chang concurred, and said he was very disappointed with the developer and management. They have shown carelessness and lack of regard for people, and it is important for the city to give the signal that they must approach this in a comprehensive way and not just on a piecemeal basis. His main concerns were the health and safety issues, particularly asbestos. It is important for the residents to have a mechanism in place to address their concerns and council should be an advocate for them on the asbestos issue, even to the point of considering work stoppage. He agreed with the idea that construction happen to one unit at a time. Lowenthal said he was disturbed by the differences in the reports that council has been receiving. He asked the inspectors to meet with residents to get the facts. He said he would also like to see an independent report on the air quality. Lowenthal mentioned the comment by a renter about the loss of amenities and asked if this was a violation of the agreement. Kilian said there might be a case of constructive eviction. That would be the basis of a civil action against the landlord, but that is between the landlord and the tenant, and the city is not in a position to intervene in that situation. James asked those in the audience to provide their name and telephone number so that staff could follow up. Building Inspector Jerry Brager said he walks the project three times a day and meets with the contractors when they are on site. He keeps the site very clean, and runs off people that do not belong there. He makes sure that nails are cleaned up, and has already shut down the job once. As a building inspector, he can only deal with code issues in the Uniform Plumbing Code, Mechanical Code, Building Code, and Electrical Code. However, when he leaves there are two or three hours when additional problems can arise. He is not allowed to enter apartment units without permission of the tenant, but would be happy to make inspections upon request. Kilian noted that if a unit is uninhabitable, then the inspector needs to red tag it, which means the people can't live there any more. If they were required to go to a motel or to seek other lodging as a result of that, that would be part of their lawsuit. Council concurred to file this report and directed staff to monitor the construction and respond to any complaints related to building code or code enforcement issues. James will meet with the owners, provide them with a videotape from tonight's meeting and asked them to respond to the public comments. She suggested that construction is done on only one building at a time so that the residents can be relocated. Residents are encouraged to contact the building officials for inspection inside their units. In the future, City Council will consider a policy or ordinance regarding construction on occupied residential housing, f July 17, 2000 Page 17 Cupertino City Council and Cupertino Redevelopment Agency 23. Status report on interim teen center and selection of skateboard park Christine Hanel presented the reports. James asked for clarification on the cost of the Sunnyvale teen center. Hanel said the $55,000 is mainly for staffing costs. They have full-time staff on hand in addition to 2-3 part-time staff members that work on this project. Up until this point, they have felt the need to have recreation coordination supervisors there on site on those evenings. Council received the report. 24. Update on Measure A project for extension of sales tax for transportation purposes. Viskovich presented a brief informational report. Margaret Okuzumi, said she was the Executive Director for Peninsula Rail 2000, a member organization of the Bay Area Transportation and Land Use Coalition. She stated that the coalition is calling upon Santa Clara County city councils to oppose this BART tax measure and to instead support the Board of Supervisors in initiating a planning process now that will place a more equitable sales tax on the ballot in 2002 or 2004. Their new report called "What's the Rush" dispels the myth that there's any advantage to rushing this proposal onto the November ballot at this time. The current proposal by the Manufacturing Group would not provide congestion relief throughout the county in an equitable fashion and would sink billions of dollars into the BART extension from Fremont to San Jose, wl~ich would not provide congestion relief for much of the county. Burnett requested that, at the next meeting, the council consider taking a stand on SB 1629, which is the safe roads bill. It's opposed by the League of California Cities but supported by the Association of Bay Area Governments, as well as Palo Alto and virtually all the environmental organizations. Council members concurred to place this item on the next agenda. CLOSED SESSION At 10:53 p.m. Council recessed to a closed session on the following items: Pending litigation - Government Code Section 54956.9(a): 1. Nemetz vs. City of Cupertino Significant exposure to litigation - GoVernment Code Section 54956.9(b)(1): 1. Browning Ferris Industries (BFI) issue regarding contract dispute Co Negotiations for purchase, sale, exchange, or lease of real property - Government Code Section 54956.8: 1. home of the former city manager July 17, 2000 Page 18 Cupertino City Council and Cupertino Redevelopment Agency At 11:26 p.m., Council reconvened. The City attorney said that with respect to the Nemetz matter, the council directed its negotiator along the lines discussed in closed session. With respect to the BFI claim, the matter will be put on the next city council agenda for consideration. Finally, with respect to the city manager's home, there has been direction given to the negotiator to approach Mr. Brown with respect to purchase of the property. ADJOURNMENT At 11:27 p.m. the meeting was adjourned to July 27 at 6:45 p.m. Kimberly Smith, City Clerk DRAVr MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Special Meeting Thursday, July 27, 2000 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 6:00 p.m. Mayor Statton called the meeting to order in the Council Chambers, 10300 Torte Avenue, Cupertino, California, and led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Council members present: Mayor John Statton, and Council members Don Bumett and Richard Lowenthal. Council members absent: Vice-Mayor Sandra James and Council member Michael Chang. Staff present: Public Works Director Bert Viskovich, City Attorney Charles Kilian, and City Clerk Kimberly Smith. CEREMONIAL MATTERS - PRESENTATIONS - None POSTPONEMENTS - None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None CONSENT CALENDAR- None ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR - None PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Hazardous vegetation - public hearing to receive objections regarding assessments for removal of weeds. Resolution No. 00-210. Mayor Statton opened the public hearing. There were no speakers, and the public hearing was closed at 6:05 p.m. Burnett moved to adopt Resolution No. 00-210. Low~thal seconded and the motion carried 3-0, with Chang and James absent. PLANNING APPLICATIONS - None UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None July 27, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 2 NEW BUSINESS Review of bids and award of contract for Stevens Canyon Road Widening, Project 98- 120. Public Works Director Bert Viskovich reviewed the staff report, and recommended that all bids be rejected and staff be authorized to re-advertise for bids in the fall, with construction to occur in the spring. Bumett moved to reject all bids and authorize re-advertisement. Lowenthal seconded, and the motion carried 3-0 with Chang and James absent. Discussion of SB 1629 (Sher) which pertains to pedestrian and bicycle access to highways. Council member Bumett reviewed his letter to Council in support of the bill. The letter said that the League of California Cities is opposed to the bill on the basis that it is a loss of local control and an unfunded mandate. Mr. Bumett believed there are issues of civil rights and equal treatment under the law that would override the League's points. Bumett moved to send a letter for support on Senate Bill 1629. Lowenthal seconded and the motion carried 3-0 with Chang and James voting no. ORDINANCES - None STAFF REPORTS - None COUNCIL REPORTS - None CLOSED SESSION At 6:15 p.m., Council recessed to a closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a), pending litigation, regarding Nemetz vs. City of Cupertino. At 6:30 p.m. Council reconvened in open session. The City Attomey announced that the Council had given direction to their representative to make an offer. ADJOURNMENT At 6:30 p.m. the meeting was adjourned to a Council workshop on August 8, beginning at 8:00 a.m. at the Blackberxy Farm Retreat Center. The City Clerk noted that the meeting of August 7 was cancelled. The next meeting of the City Council will be on Monday, August 21, 2000. Kimberly Smith, City Clerk DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL Regular Adjourned Meeting Tuesday, August 8, 2000 CALL TO ORDER At 8:05 a.m. Mayor Statton called the meeting to order in the Blackberry Farm Retreat Center, 21979 San Femando Avenue, Cupertino, California. ROLL CALL City Council members present: Mayor John Statton, Vice-Mayor Sandra James, and Council members Don Bumett, Michael Chang, and Richard Lowenthal. Council members absent: None. Staff present: City Manager David Knapp, Administrative Services Director Carol Atwood, Community Development Director Steve Piasecki; Public Works Director Bert Viskovieh, and Parks and Recreation Supervisor Mike 0'Dowd. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None COUNCIL WORKSHOP 1. Civic Center plan Community Development Director Steve Piasecki gave an overview of the Civic Center Plan and distributed a handout defining the objectives for the civic center and the town center. He discussed the goals and objectives and the trade-offs associated with different scenarios of land-use activity. Public Works Director Bert Viskovich led a discussion on potential uses and how they will affect the level of service for traffic at intersections. Council members commented that they want this area to be a gathering place with a sense that it is the center of town. It was also suggested that the entire block should have a master plan. Several council members expressed concern over traffic. Council agreed to make the library the focal point fi.om DeAnza Boulevard with retail uses positioned on each side of the entrance into town center and activities planned to constantly draw people into the civic center, or "heart" of the area. Mary Ann Wallace (Cupertino librarian) and Dorothy Stow (chair of the Library Committee) expressed concern about losing sight of the purpose of this project which is to build a new library. Sal Caruso, an architect, suggested placement of the library as a focal point and that the council consider purchasing some property on De Anza Boulevard to square off the entrance into the Town Center project. July 27, 2000 Cupertino City Council Page 2 2. Review fund reserve level policy Administrative Services Director Atwood discussed the concept of legal vs. designated reserves, noting that the general fund reserve includes money for economic uncertainty, disaster/unanticipated expenditures, and CIP reserves (base and excess) Discussion followed as to how much money should be designated in each area, and council decided on the following breakdown: Economic Uncertainty (approximately 8-10%) $2.5 m Disaster/Unanticipated Expenses 7.5 m CIP - Base level 5.0 m $15.0 m Any annual net income from the General Fund will go to the CIP reserve. 3. Set capital improvement project priorities Criteria were proposed for the initial staff ranking of the capital improvement projects. Council could then move projects as they felt appropriate. Council reviewed each CIP item, as well as the 2000/01 budget and new items, and confirmed the 2000/01 list ADJOURNMENT At 2:50 p.m. the meeting was adjourned. Carol Atwood, Administrative Services Director RESOLUTION NO. 00-211 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND . MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JULY 7, 2000 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: DireCtor of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st day of August ,2000, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 07/07/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/03/2000" and "07/07/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND 'CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 578209 07/03/00 M GARCIA, PHYLIS 110 1020 578210 07/05/00 197 1020 578211 07/05/00 424 1020 578212 07/05/00 1866 1020 578213 07/07/00 M 1020 ~78214 07/07/00 M 1020 578215 07/07/00 28 1020 578216 07/07/00 29 1020 578217 07/07/00 1884 1020 578217 07/07/00 1884 1020 578217 07/07/00 1884 1020 578217 07/07/00 1884 1020 578217 07/07/00 1884 1020 578217 07/07/00 1884 1020 578217 07/07/00 1884 1020 578217 07/07/00 1884 1020 578217 07/07/00 1884 1020 578217 07/07/00 1884 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578218 07/07/00 M 1020 578219 07/07/00 M 1020 578220 07/07/00 44 1020 578221 07/07/00 M 1020 578222 07/07/00 1287 1020 578223 07/07/00 864 1020 578224 07/07/00 85 1020 578225 07/07/00 1057 1020 578225 07/07/00 1057 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578226 07/07/00 92 1020 578227 07/07/00 M 1020 578228 07/07/00 108 CUPERTINO TOWN CENTER 1101500 MARCHANT TRAVEL 5506549 LAURIE GUNNING 1106248 ADAMS, JOCELYN 580 AHN, HEATHER 580 AIRGAS 1108501 LYNNE DIANE AITKEN 5706450 ALBERTSONS-NORRTERN DIVI 5606680 ALBERTSONS-NORHTERIgDIVI 5606680 ALBERTSONS-NORRTERN DIVI 5806349 ALBERTSONS-NORRTERN DIVI 5806349 ALBERTSONS-NORHTERN DIVI 5806349 ALBERTSONS-NOP3iTERN DIVI 5806349 ALBERTSONS-NORIITERN DIVI 5806349 ALBERTSONS-NORI4TERN DIVI 1106343 ALBERTSONS-NORHTERN DIVI 5806349 ALBERTSONS-NORHTERN DIVI 5806349 ALVARADO, MARIANNE 580 AMAI/KEYE PRODUCTIVITY C 1108601 AMERICAN RED CROSS 1104400 ASCE CONTINUING EDUCATIO 1108602 ASTRO JUmP 1106248 CAROL ATWOOD 4209217 BAY ALARM COMPANY 1108502 BENEFITAMERICA 110 BENEFITI%MERICA 110 BEST OF COUPONS 5706450 BIiALERAO, ANAGHA 580 BROOKS CUPERTINO GLASS 1108507 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... REPLACE CK571969 R9796 ~ 7/00 EASTERN EUROPE TRIP PERFORMER 7/6/00 RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND SUPPLIES RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND SEMINAR/R CHONG SUPPLIES SEMINAR 9/14-9/15/00 NEW DRAGON 7/13/00 REIMBURSEMENT MONITORIN~ FEE 3110222 DED:4700 *FLEX HLTH DED:4600 'FLEX DEP DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISIN RECREATION REFUND REPAIRS SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE I AMOUNT 350.00 3884.00 77922.51 600.00 25.00 121.00 31.10 92.00 87.65 38.09 300.00 34.64 29,36 48.50 18 70.83 48.67 721.65 80.00 159.00 80.00 695.00 150.00 341.25 675.00 118.65 769.24 887.89 1500.00 270.00 RUN DAT~ 07/07/00 TIMB 08:53:47 - FINANCIAL ACCOIH~TZNG 07/07/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CH~CK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND · -- .~TION CRITERIA: ~ransact.trans date between "07/03/2000" and "07/07/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 578229 07/07/00 114 BUBBLE MACHINE CAR WASH 6308540 1020 578230 07/07/00 M C3%LTI~$ 1108101 1020 578231 07/07/00 M CCEC 1104530 1020 578232 07/07/00 1156 CHA 110 1020 578233 07/07/00 M CHAE, PETER 580 1020 578234 07/07/00 M CHANG, LANCE 580 1020 578235 07/07/00 1432 CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUS 5806349 1020 578236 07/07/00 M CI{13, Si~LLY 580 1020 578237 07/07/00 M2001 1020 578238 07/07/00 173 1020 578238 07/07/00 173 1020 578238 07/07/00 173 ' 578238 07/07/00 173 578238 07/07/00 173 1020 578238 07/07/00 173 1020 578238 07/07/00 173 1020 578238 07/07/00 173 1020 578238 07/07/00 173 1020 578238 07/07/00 173 1020 578238 07/07/00 173 1020 578238 07/07/00 173 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578239 1020 578240 1020 578240 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578241 1020 578242 1020 578243 1020 578244 1020 578244 TOTAL CIiECK 07/07/00 178 07/07/00 183 07/07/00 183 07/07/00 M 07/07/00 1407 07/07/00 985 07/07/00 209 07/07/00 209 07/07/00 M 578245 CHL~CH COUNCIL OF GREATE 5506549 COCA-COLA BOTTLING OF CA 5706450 COCA-COLA BOTTLING OF CA 5706450 COCA-COLA BOTTLING OF CA 5706450 COCA-COLA BOTTLING OF CA 5706450 COCA-COLA BOTTLING OF CA 5706450 COCA-COLA BOTTLING OF CA 5706450 COCA-CgLA BOTTLING OF CA 5706450 COCA-COLA BOTTLING OF CA 5706450 COCA-COLA BOTTLING OF CA 5706450 COCA-COLA BOTTLING OF CA 5706450 COCA-COLA BOTTLING OF CA 5706450 COCA-COLA BOTTLING OF CA 5706450 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 110 COTTON SHIRES & ASSO IN 110 COTTON SHIRES & ASSO IN 110 CROSBY, RAMONA 580 CII~INGS H~NDERSON TIRE 6308540 CUPERTINO FLORIST INC 1106100 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 5708510 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108501 DEBNATH, CHITRA 580 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX CITY VEHICLE CAR WASH 0.00 PAGE 2 AMOUNT. 130.00 PUBLICATION 0.00 24.00 SEMINAR 0.00 675.00 DED:4400 CHA 0.00 130.50 RECREATIONREFUND 0.00 121.00 RECREJ%TION REFUND 0.00 100.00 DEPOSIT 7/31/00 0.00 25.00 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 68.00 0.00 "HOW TO HIRE HELPERS" 100.00 CREDIT 7/22/1996 0.00 -27.06 SUPPLIES 0.00 187.48 SUPPLIES 0.00 170.85 SUPPLIES 0.00 405.78 SUPPLIES 0.00 86.36 CREDIT 10/14/1992 0.00 -941.50 CREDIT 12/20/1996 0.00 -126.00 CREDIT 6/15/1995 0.00 -64.89 SUPPLIES 0.00 77.50 SUPPLIES 0.00 259.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 253.42 SUPPLIES 0.00 0.04 0.00 280.98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 INS PREMIUM 7/00 PROF SVCS 4/00 PROF SVCS 4/00 REC~ATION REFUND TIME & MATERIAL FLOWERS/TERRI CCX2)K SPECIAL SVCS 6/00 SPECIAL SVCS 6/00 RECREATION REFUND 0.00 66.75 425.00 95.00 520.00 10.00 195.87 78.48 1S0.00 195.00 345.00 48.00 RUN DATE 07/07/00 TIME 08:53:48 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTXNG 07/07/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 3 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.frans_date between "07/03/2000" and "07/07/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 578246 07/07/00 211 1020 578247 07/07/00 1313 1020 578248 07/07/00 M 1020 578249 07/07/00 M 1020 578250 07/07/00 1354 1020 578250 07/07/00 1354 1020 578250 07/07/00 1354 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578251 07/07/00 1104 1020 578252 07/07/00 M 1020 578253 07/07/00 M 1020 578254 07/07/00 1397 1020 578255 07/07/00 M 1020 578256 07/07/00 239 1020 578256 07/07/00 239 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578257 07/07/00 242 1020 578258 07/07/00 243 1020 578259 07/07/00 1320 1020 578260 07/07/00 234 1020 578260 07/07/00 234 TOTAL C~ECK 1020 578261 07/07/00 251 1020 578262 07/07/00 M 1020 578263 07/07/00 1935 1020 578264 07/07/00 M 1020 578265 07/07/00 264 1020 578266 07/07/00 1938 1020 578266 07/07/00 1938 TOTAL CHECK ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CA 110 DELTA SAFETY SUPPLY CO 1108303 DENDA, YOSHIKO 580 DINGWALL, JENNIFER 580 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY 1108501 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY 1108312 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY 1108501 DIVERSIFIED RISK 1104540 DON'NELLY, LORRAINE 580 DOUGL4%S, NE~ 580 BYRON J DUHON 5706450 EBINE, SANAE 580 ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1108530 ELEC~ICAL DISTRIBUTORS 1108530 EMPLOY~/~f DEVEL DEPT 110 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 110 F~IPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT D 1104540 ENGINEERING DATA SBRVICE 110 ENGINEERING DATA SERVICE 1101070 EVANS NEST V~J~LEY SPRAY 1108315 EWING, CLEOPATRA 580 EXHIBIT 1106343 FALCONE, SHEILA 580 FITZPATRICK BARRICADB & 1108602 FLORETINE RESTAURANT 1101200 FLORETINE RESTAUBANT 1101200 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... DENTAL INSU~CE 7/00 SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES BLOCK PARTY INSURANCE RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND RECREATION PROGRAM RECREATION REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES DED:*SCA SIT DED:*TSD SDI MARK C74ECK 77652600 NOTICES #I000502 NOTICES #I000502 TIME & MATERIAL RECREATION REFUND STREET BANNER RECREATION REFUND SUPPLIES LUNC~ 6/28/00 LUNC~ 6/29/00 SALES TAX AMOUNT 0.00 12021.00 0.00 133.09 0.00 184.00 0.00 80.00 0.00 15.95 0.00 134.40 0.00 134.40 0.00 284.75 0.00 410.72 0.~0 48.00 0.00 99.00 0.00 69.00 0.00 242.00 10.32 2 1 27.88 365.85 38.20 501.17 0.00 26193.87 0.00 782.11 0.00 498.53 0.00 135.51 0.00 78.13 0.00 213.64 0.00 3500.00 0.00 70.00 0.00 1559.43 0.00 60.00 0.00 303.48 0.00 97.35 0.00 98.98 0.00 196.33 RUN DATE 07/07/00 TIME 08:53:49 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 07/07/00 CI~"f OF CUPERTINO ACCO%~TING PERIOD: 1/01 C~CK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT ~.~ION CRITERIA: transacu.trans_date between -07/03/2000" and "07/07/2000" ~ - 110 - GEN~P~AL FL~ CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 578267 1020 578268 1020 578268 TOTAL C~CK 1020 578269 1020 578270 1020 578271 1020 · 578272 1020 578272 1020 578272 1020 578272 1020 578272 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578273 1020 578274 578275 1020 578276 1020 578276 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578277 1020 578277 1020 578277 1020 578277 1020 578277 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578278 1020 578278 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578279 1020 578280 1020 578281 1020 578282 1020 578283 578284 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 07/07/00 818 FLOYD D BROWN FIP~T AID 1108312 07/07/00 281 G~D~ 1108408 07/07/00 281 C,A~/)~ 1108408 07/07/00 291 07/07/00 1936 GO~EN TOUCH I2%N~DSCAPING 1108314 GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF EME 1108101 07/07/00 M G!~, MARY 580 07/07/00 298 GRAINGER INC 07/07/00 298 GRAINGER INC 07/07/00 298 GRAINGER INC 07/07/00 298 GRAINGER INC 07/07/00 298 GRAINGER INC 1108312 1108504 1108501 1108502 1108501 07/07/00 M 07/07/00 M 07/07/00 328 07/07/00 1235 07/07/00 1235 G~30, LING 580 H~, JIAMING 580 I~ ~]~NSH~tLL 5706450 HIG",~K LIFE INSU~CE 110 HIG}~4ARK LIFE INSURANCE 6414570 07/07/00 1898 HORIZON 1108312 07/07/00 1898 HORIZON 1108312 07/07/00 1898 HORIZON 1108314 07/07/00 1898 HORIZON 1108312 07/07/00 1898 HORIZON 1108314 07/07/00 M 07/07/00 M HSI;tNG, K~ 580 F~S I~G, F~ 580 07/07/00 M 07/07/00 M 07/07/00 337 07/07/00 343 07/07/00 M o7/o7/oo 369 HUANG, SHAW 580 ~IN, LOUISE 580 HUSBANDS & ~SSOCIA%~S 1108303 IC~R~IRE~ TRUST-45 110 KANG, SUE 580 ~.~.Y-MOORE PAINT CO INC 1108501 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... TIME & MATERIAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE OVERPAYMENT TM99-131 RECREATION REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REC~TION REF~ P~CREATION RE~3ND REC~TI ON PR~P, AM LIFE & LTD SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND REC~TION RE~ P, EC~TION REF~ REC~TIONREF%~ BIKE RACKS/BOLLARDS DED:3100 *I(~A RECREATION REFUND PARTS & SUPPLIES SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 138.16 0.35 0.00 0.00 22.19 160.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 89.91 68.47 90.24 117.81 2.17 368.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 4 AMOUNT 326.39 139.64 82.15 221.79 2092.00 551.00 100.00 1812.66 4.64 236.00 171.03 291.18 2515.51 30.50 30.00 181.00 6975.80 4724.83 11700.63 1179.64 898.45 1184.07 1545.81 28.57 4836.54 42.00 90.00 132.00 70.00 45.00 1216.68 10660.29 111.00 143.94 RUN DA~ 07/07/00 TIME 08:53:49 - FI~%NCI~J~ ACCO~H~TI~ 07/07/00 CItY OP CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: ~ransact.~rans_date between "07/03/2000" and "07/07/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE 5 AMOUNT 1020 578285 07/07/00 M KIiAN, SEEMA 580 1020 578286 07/07/00 M KUBOZONO, YOKO 580 1020 578287 07/07/00 382 KWIK-KOPY PRINTING 5506549 1020 578288 07/07/00 M LAIRD, JOANNE 580 1020 578289 07/07/00 M LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS 1104330 1020 578290 07/07/00 M LEE, HAE 580 1020 578291 07/07/00 1393 THE LEONARD GROUP INC 5506549 1020 578292 07/07/00 397 LESLIE'S POOL SUPPLIES I 1108312 1020 578292 07/07/00 397 LESLIE'S POOL SUPPLIES I 1108303 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578293 07/07/00 1599 1020 578294 07/07/00 M 1020 578295 07/07/00 900 1020 578296 07/07/00 437 1020 578297 07/07/00 1804 1020 578298 07/07/00 447 1020 578298 07/07/00 447 1020 578298 07/07/00 447 1020 578298 07/07/00 447 1020 578298 07/07/00 447 TOTAL C~ECK 1020 578299 07/07/00 448 1020 578300 07/07/00 1383 1020 578300 07/07/00 1383 1020 578300 07/07/00 1383 1020 578300 07/07/00 1383 1020 578300 07/07/00 1383 1020 578300 07/07/00 1383 1020 578300 07/07/00 1383 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578301 07/07/00 1906 1020 578302 07/07/00 1023 MANAGED HEALTH NETWORK I 1104510 MCCARTHY, KEVIN 580 MESITI-MILLER ENGINEERIN 1108503 METRO .NEWSPAPERS 1104300 MINOLTA PLANETARIUM 5806349 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 1108201 1108201 1108201 1108201 MISSION VALLEY FORD INC 6308540 MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308540 MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308540 MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308540 MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308540 MITCHF,/~ BROS AUTO PARTS 6308540 MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308540 MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308540 MITY-LITH INC 1106360 MASSOUDMODJTEHEDI 1107502 RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND NEWSLETTER JUL/AUG 00 REFI/ND DEPOSIT 6/17/00 DONATION RECREATION REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES EAP 7/oo REC~TION PROF SVCS THRU 6/25/00 LEGAL PUBLICATION 7/13/oo UNIFORM SERVICE SUPPLIES UNIFORM SERVICE SUPPLIES UNIFORM SERVICE TIME & MATERIAL PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS SUPPLIES PARTS SUPPLIES PLAN REVIEW SERVICES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 56.00 552.00 308.51 100.00 250.00 121.00 170.00 7.70 850.72 858.42 0.00 725.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 ~ ~4 0.00 75.00 0.00 112.50 0.00 84.32 0.00 3.00 0.00 84.32 0.00 3.00 0.00 84.32 0.00 258.96 0.00 2.49 1.56 19.90 1.90 5.11 0.86 3.23 35.05 153,75 0.00 530.00 32.73 20.52 261.14 24.90 67.09 11.23 42.33 459.94 2274.39 35908.20 RUN DATE 07/07/00 TINE 08:53:50 - FINANCIAL ACCOII~TING 07/07/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 6 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISB~SEMEXTT CRITERIA: cransact.~rans_date between "07/03/2000" and "07/07/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT C~ECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT 1020 578303 07/07/00 465 1020 578303 07/07/00 465 1020 578303 07/07/00 465 1020 578303 07~07/00 465 1020 578303 07/07/00 466 1020 578303 07/07/00 465 TOT~J~ CHECK MOUNTAIN VIEW GARDEN CEN 1108303 MOUNTAIN VIEW GARDEN CEN 1108314 MOU~AIN VIeW GAR/~EN C~N 1108314 MOUNTAIN VIEW GARDEN CEN 1108407 MOUNTAIN VIEW GARDEN CEN 4209526 MOUNTAIN VIEW GARDEN CEN 1108312 1020 S78304 07/07/00 485 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 1108602 1020 578305 07/07/00 486 NOBLE FORD TRACTOR INC 6308540 1020 578306 1020 578306 TOTAL CHECK 07/07/00 487 NOR%~AINE S~/PPLY CO 5708510 07/07/00 487 NOR~"~AIP~ SI/PPLY CO 1108507 102'0 578307 1020 578307 1020 578307 1020 578307 1020 578307 1020 578307 ~'~" CHECK 07/07/00 192 07/07/00 192 07/07/00 192 07/07/00 192 07/07/00 192 07/07/00 192 NOVACARE OCCUPATIONAL HE 5806449 NOVACARE OCCUPATIONAL HE 5806449 NOVACARE OCCUPATIONAL HE 5806449 NOVACARE OCCUPATIONAL HE 5806449 NOVACARE OCCUPATIONAL HE 5806449 NOVACAR~ OCCUPATIONAL HE 5806449 1020 578308 07/07/00 M NOWICKI, HELEN 580 07/07/00 495 OFFICE HELPER 1104300 07/07/00 495 OFFICE HELPER 1104300 1020 578309 1020 578309 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578310 07/07/00 501 OPERATING ENGINEER~ #3 110 1020 578311 1020 578311 1020 578311 1020 578311 1020 578311 1020 578311 1020 578311 1020 578311 1020 578311 1020 578311 1020 578311 1020 578311 TOTAL CHECK 07/07/00 981 ORC~ SUPPLY H~ 1108303 07/07/00 981 ORC~ SUPPLY H~%/~E 6308540 07/07/00 981 ORC~ SUPPLY HARDW~ 1108321 07/07/00 981 ORC~ SUPPLY HARDWA~ 5706450 07/07/00 981 ORC~ SUPPLY~ 1108303 07/07/00 981 ORC~ SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108315 07/07/00 981 ORC~ S~PLY F~ 1108312 07/07/00 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108303 07/07/00 981 ORC~ SUPPLY F~ARE 1108503 07/07/00 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARX)WA~ 1108303 07/07/00 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY X~ 1108321 07/07/00 981 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 2708405 1020 578312 1020 578312 TOTAL CHECK 578313 07/07/00 507 DAN OS~OP~ 4209206 07/07/00 507 D~OSBOP,NE 4209216 07/07/00 833 P E R S 110 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PPD TB PPD TB PPDTB PPD TB PPD TB PPD TB R~CRF-,%TIONREFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES DED:4100 UNION Db-ES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SD'PPLIES SUPPLIES CRF, DIT 5/3/00 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES S~/PPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES TIME & .MATERIAL TIME & MATERIAL DED:0502 PERS SPEC SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.90 29.98 39.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.32 0.74 9.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMOUNT 363.30 28.09 28.09 332.37 181.54 31.34 964.73 632.00 190.30 129.85 393.38 523.23 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 90.00 94.06 123.07 10.99 134.06 415.50 242.82 32.50 239.08 207.30 -24.89 7.89 500.41 464.12 47.35 51.39 25.92 40.93 1834.82 385.56 2160.00 2545.56 1394.01 RUN DATE 07/07/00 TIME 08:53:51 - FINANCIAL ACCO~H~TIN~ 07/07/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 7 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 Ch~CK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transacc.trans_date between "07/03/2000" and "07/07/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FU~ CA,gM ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 578313 07/07/00 833 P E R S 110 1020 578313 07/07/00 833 P E R S 110 1020 578313 07/07/00 833 P E R S 110 1020 578313 07/07/00 833 P E R S 110 1020 578313 07/07/00 833 P E R S 110 1020 578313 07/07/00 833 P E R S 110 1020 578313 07/07/00 833 P E R S 110 1020 578313 07/07/00 833 P E R S 110 TOT~LL CHECK 1020 578314 07/07/00 508 P E R S - HEALT~ 110 1020 578314 07/07/00 508 P E R S - HF2%LT~ 1104510 1020 578314 07/07/00 508 P E R S - HEALTH 1104510 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578315 07/07/00 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108507 1020 578316 07/07/00 M PARKER, DENICE 5500000 1020 578317 07/07/00 M 1020 578318 07/07/00 533 PENNER, WENDY 580 PBRS LONG TERM CARE PROG 110 1020 578319 07/07/00 M PETERSEN, BETT~ 5500000 1020 578320 07/07/00 541 ROBIN PICK~L 5706450 1020 578321 07/07/00 574 ~CH FITNESS CLUB 5706450 1020 578321 07/07/00 574 P,~CH FI~NESS CLUB 5706450 1020 578321 07/07/00 574 REACH FIT~SS CLUB 5706450 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578322 07/07/00 606 JOYC~ RUSSUM 5706450 1020 578323 07/07/00 610 S & S WORLDWIDE 5806349 1020 578324 07/07/00 611 S C CO TRANSPORTATION 5S06549 1020 578325 07/07/00 617 SAN JOSE BLUE 1108101 1020 578326 07/07/00 M SARG~"~TI, GERRY 5500000 1020 578327 07/07/00 640 1020 578327 07/07/00 640 1020 578327 07/07/00 640 TOTAL CHECK SCA HYGIENE PAPER INC 1108303 SCA HYGIENE PAPER INC 1108315 SCA HYGIENE PAPER INC 1108314 1020 578328 07/07/00 1916 CAROL SHEPHERD 1108101 58O 1020 578329 07/07/OO M S~WE, ALMA ..... DESCRIPTION DED:0510 PERS BUYBK D£D:0503 PERS EMPLY DED:0504 PERS EMPLR DED:0500 PERS EMPLR D£D:0525 PERS 1959 DED:0501 PERS EMPLY DED:0511 *PERS BYBK DED:0521 'PERS BYBK HEALTH PREMIUM 7/00 HF. ALTH PREMIUM 7/00 H~ALTH PREMIUM 7/0O SECURITY SYS 020506331 SR CTR TRIP REFUND RECREATION REFUND DED:0530 PERS LTC SR CTRTRIP REFUND RECREATION PROGRAM PROP SVCS 4/00 PROP SVCS 5/00 PROP SVCS 6/00 RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES MONTHLY FLASH PASS FIXED LINE MYLARS/MAP SR CfR TRIP REFUND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES HEI~URSEMENT RECREATION REFUND SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00' 0.00 0.00 104.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMOUNT 67,68 196,90 26.55 3101.26 72.54 21602.58 305.65 742.45 27509.62 39003.97 19092.06 305.59 58401.62 576.00 57.00 60.00 343.38 0 455.00 1050.00 1953.00 1750.00 4753.00 138.00 79.83 126.00 1375.36 57.00 86.25 86.26 B6.25 258.76 47.87 71.00 RUN DATI: 07/07/00 TIME 08:53:51 - FINANCIAL ACCO~TING 07/07/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 8 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND 'CTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/03/2000" and "07/07/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT C~ECK NO 1020 578330 1020 578330 TOTAL CM~CK 1020 578331 1020 578332 1020 578333 1020 578334 1020 578335 1020 578336 1020 578337 1020 578338 1020 578338 1020 578338 1020 578338 /'-- 578338 578338 1020 578338 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578339 1020 578340 1020 578341 1020 578341 1020 578341 1020 578341 TOTAL C~ECK 1020 578342 1020 578343 1020 578344 1020 578345 1020 578346 1020 578346 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578347 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 07/07/00 652 SIERRA SPRING WATER COMP 1106265 07/07/00 652 SIERRA SPRING WATER COMP 1101500 07/07/00 658 07/07/00 M 07/07/00 M 07/07/00 677 07/07/00 1012 07/07/00 688 07/07/00 M 07/07/00 695 07/07/00 695 07/07/00 695 07/07/00 695 07/07/00 695 07/07/00 695 07/07/00 695 SILVER. ADO SPRINGS BOTTLE 1104510 SMITH, MICHAEL A 580 SNYDER-HAVENS, HILLARY 580 STATE STREET BANK & THUS 110 STOREFRONT DOOR SERVICE 1108501 SULLIVAN AND MANN LUMBER 1108408 SUNI~AIaE-CUPERTINO BAR 1101500 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 07/07/00 M 07/07/00 698 07/07/00 700 07/07/00 70O 07/07/00 700 07/07/00 700 TABA, KIMBERLY 580 TALLY'S ENTERPRISES 2708403 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108312 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108303 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108312 TARGET SPECIALTY'PRODUCT 1108312 07/07/00 701 TARGET STORES 5806349 07/07/00 M TAU, CHERYL 580 07/07/00 M TAY, SOO 580 07/07/00 1538 TMT ENTERPRISES INC 1108314 07/07/00 1836 TRIPLE PLAY VENDING COMP 5706450 07/07/00 1836 TRIPLE PLAY VF. NDING COMP 5706450 07/07/00 1154 UNITED WAY OF SANTA CLAR 110 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... WATER 5/3-5/31/00 WATER 5/3-5/31/00 EMPLOYEE WATER RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND DED:3200 *PERS DEF TIME & MATERIALS 10' LODGEPOLES MONTHLY MEETING SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CREDIT 6/14/00 SUPPLIES RECRF~%TION REFUND PROF SVCS 6/25/00 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND S~ND SUPPLIES SUPPLIES DED:4500 UNITED WAY SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.80 31.18 7.30 0.00 3.37 0.00 4.72 62.37 0.00 0.00 S5.90 114.95 75.87 18.88 265.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~40b'NT 108.35 34.17 142.52 156.50 168.50 38.50 949.72 379.25 830.64 25.00 2614.68 2235.19 356.23 22.74 44.20 -375.61 1660.05 6557.48 20.00 18000.00 733.42 1508.23 995.49 247.68 3484.82 9.73 119.00 92.00 665.68 409.93 150.41 560.34 131.75 RUN DATE 07/07/00 TIME 08:53:52 - FINANCIAL ACCOU~iTING 07/07/00 CITer OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/03/2000" and "07/07/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT 1020 578348 07/07/00 737 1020 578349 07/07/00 738 1020 578350 07/07/00 1919 1020 578351 07/07/00 750 1020 578352 07/07/00 M 1020 578352 07/07/00 M 1020 578352 07/07/00 M 1020 578352 07/07/00 M TOTAL CHECK 1020 578353 07/07/00 M 1020 578354 07/07/00 302 1020 578355 07/07/00 1937 1020 578356 07/07/00 775 1020 578357 07/07/00 781 1020 578358 07/07/00 M 1020 578359 07/07/00 M 1020 578360 07/07/00 792 1020 578361 07/07/00 1081 1020 578361 07/07/00 1081 TOTAL C~ECK 1020 578362 07/07/00 M 1020 578363 07/07/00 805 1020 578363 07/07/00 805 1020 578363 07/07/00 805 1020 578363 07/07/00 805 1020 578363 07/07/00 805 1020 578363 07/07/00 805 1020 578363 07/07/00 805 1020 578363 07/07/00 805 1020 578363 07/07/00 605 1020 578363 07/07/00 805 1020 578363 07/07/00 805 1020 578363 07/07/00 805 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578364 '07/07/00 M VALLEY CREST TREE COMPAN 1108408 VALLEY OIL COMPANY 6308540 VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AU 1108005 VISION SERVICE PLAN 110 VITALIE, JANEEN 580 VITALIE, JANEEN 580 VITALIE, JANEEN 580 VITALIE, JANEEN 580 VON SCHOELER, FRANCES 5500000 WASHINGTON MUTUAL 110 WEST VALLEY SECURITY 1108303 WESTERN PACIFIC SIGNAL L 4209524 DOLORES WHITTA~R 5706450 WIDJAJA, ANITA 580 WONG, CY1Ti~IA BARTLETT 580 LILY WU 5706450 YAMAGAMI'S NURSERY 1108303 YAMAGAMI'S NURSERY 1108303 YAP, FUNG 5500000 ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROU. ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROU ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROU ZI~4WALT ENGINEERING GROU ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROU ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROU ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROU ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROU Z~%9~ALT ENGINEERING GROU ZI~WALT ENGINEERING GROU ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROU ZI~4WALT ENGINEERING GROU ZUNIAC, A, GABRIELA 2709412 4209530 4209527 4209528 2709437 2709443 2709443 4209529 2709440 2709438 2709436 2709413 58O ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SUPPLIES FUEL CONGESTION MGMT PROGRA VISION INSURANCE 7/00 RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND RECI~EATIONREFUND RECREATION REFUND SR CTR TRIP REFUND DED: 3000 *WASHMUTL PARTS & SUPPLIES ATMS / CONTROLLER UPGRAD RECREATION PROGRAM RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SR CTR TRIP REFUND PROF SVCS 5/00 PROF SVCS 5/00 PROF SVCS 5/00 PROF SVCS 5/00 PROF SVCS 5/00 PROF SVCS 5/00 PROF SVCS 5/00 PROF SVCS 5/00 PROF SVCS 5/00 PROF SVCS 5/00 PROF SVCS 5/00 PROF SVCS 5/00 RECREATION REFUND SAleS TA~ 0.00 23.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 9 AMOUNT 2712.75 306.02 19993.00 1890.40 50.00 100.00 50.00 100.00 300.00 67.00 17278.43 92.01 28145.00 4' q0 147.00 150.00 230.00 5.95 49.69 55.64 S7.00 51.00 76.50 1244.10 674.S0 459.00 1086.50 755.04 280.50 360.00 651.50 616.50 76.50 6331.64 RUN DATE 07/07/00 TIME 08:53:53 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 07/07/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 C74~CK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND ~CTION CRITERIA: transac~.~rans_date between "07/03/2000" and "07/07/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 578365 TOTAL CASM ACCOUNT TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT 07/07/00 1558 JOSE ZUNIGA JR 5706450 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SECURITY 6/24/00 SALES TAX 0.00 1312.08 1312.08 1312.08 PAGE AMOUNT 45.00 431786,77 431786.77 431786.77 RUN DATE 07/07/00 TIME 08:53:53 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING -II RESOLUTION NO. 00-212 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE 1N THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND . MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JUL 14, 2O0O WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: Director of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st day of August ,2000, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 07/14100 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CITY OF CUPERTINO CMECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND PAGE SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/10/2000" and "07/14/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 1020 577928 V 06/16/00 1650 OP~O'S CHRISTMAS TREE 6308540 SUPPLIES 0.00 -82,00 1020 578313 V 07/07/00 833 P E R S 110 1020 578313 V 07/07/00 833 P E R S 110 1020 578313 V 07/07/00 833 P E R S 110 1020 578313 V 07/07/00 833 P E R S 110 1020 578313 V 07/07/00 833 P E R S 110 1020 578313 V 07/07/00 833 P E R $ 110 1020 578313 V 07/07/00 833 P E R S 110 1020 578313 V 07/07/00 833 P E R S 110 1020 578313 V 07/07/00 833 P E R S 110 TOTAL CHECK DED:0511 *PERS BYBK 0.00 DED:0521 *PERS BYBK 0.00 DED:0510 PERS BUYBK 0.00 DED:0502 PERS SPEC 0.00 DED:0503 PEPS EMPLY 0.00 DED:0504 PERS EMPLR 0.00 DED:0500 PERS EMPLR 0.00 DED:0525 PERS 1959 0.00 DED:0501 PEPS EMPLY 0.00 0.00 -305.65 -742.45 -67.68 -1394.01 -196.90 -26.$5 -3101.26 -72.54 -21602,58 -27509.62 1020 578366 07/10/00 513 1020 578366 07/10/00 513 1020 578366 07/10/00 513 1020 578366 07/10/00 513 1020 578366 07/10/00 513 1020 578366 07/10/00 513 TOTAL CHECK PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC C4%S & ELEC~IC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1108602 1108407 4209110 4209110 4209110 4209110 ELECTRIC 5/2-7/5/00 0.00 191.40 ELECTRIC 5/1-6/1/00 0.00 11.03 C4%S 4/28-5/31/00 0.00 42.61 ELECTRIC 4/28-5/31/00 0.00 141.76 GAS REFUND CREDIT 0.00 -81.35 CITY TAX REFUND 0.00 -1.95 0.00 303.50 1020 578367 07/11/00 10 1020 578367 07/11/00 10 1020 578367 07/11/00 10 1020 578367 07/11/00 10 1020 578367 07/11/00 10 1020 578367 07/11/00 10 1020 578367 07/11/00 10 1020 578367 07/11/00 10 1020 578367 07/11/00 10 1020 578367 07/11/00 10 1020 578367 07/11/00 10 1020 578367 07/11/00 10 1020 578367 07/tl/00 10 1020 578367 07/11/00 10 1020 578367 07/11/00 10 1020 578367 07/11/00 10 1020 578367 07/11/00 10 1020 578367 07/11/00 10 TOTAL CHECK ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL ABAG POWER- ELECTRICAL 5208003 1108506 1108602 1108602 1108530 1108511 5606640 5708510 5606620 1108503 1107405 1108507 1108504 1108312 1108407 1108315 1108314 1108303 ELECTRIC 0.00 ELECTRIC 0.00 ELECTRIC 0.00 ELECTRIC 0.00 ELECTRIC 0.00 ELECTRIC O. O0 ELECTRIC 0.00 ELECTRIC 0.00 ELECTRIC 0.00 ELECTRIC 0.00 ELECTRIC 0.00 ELECTRIC 0.00 ELECTRIC 0.00 ELECTRIC 0.00 ELECTRIC 0.00 ELECTRIC 0.00 ELECTRIC 0.00 ELECTRIC 0. O0 0.00 13.60 7 3572.66 18248.81 255.74 306.05 6178.65 1962.81 2565.44 69.90 456.60 3405.10 217,28 816,94 372,86 1073,20 6160.74 46001.86 1020 578368 07/11/00 1533 1020 578368 07/11/00 1533 TOTAL CHECK AN ARRAY OF FLOWERS AN A]t~AY OF FLOWERS 5606620 5606620 SUPPLIES 0,00 51.31 SUPPLIES 0.00 90.67 0.00 141.98 1020 578369 07/11/00 833 P E R S 1020 578369 07/11/00 833 P E R S 1020 578369 07/11/00 833 P E R S TOTAL CHECK 110 110 110 RETIP,~MENT 0.00 RETIREMENT 0.00 RETIREMENT 0.00 0.00 72.54 23193.49 1115.78 24381.81 1020 578370 07/12/00 146 CASH 5806349 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEM~ 0.00 RUN DATE 07/14/00 TIME 10:57:00 - FINANCXAL ACCOUNTING 07/14/00 CI'l~ OF CUPERTINO PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURS~ FUND --~ ~TION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/10/2000" and "07/14/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 1020 578370 07/12/00 146 CASH 5806349 1020 578370 07/12/00 146 CASH 1106265 1020 578370 07/12/00 146 CASH 5806249 1020 578370 0~/12/00 146 CASH 5806349 TOTAL CHECK PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEM~ 0.00 PETTY CASH R£IMBURSEME 0.00 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 0.00 117.00 33.07 34.29 55.82 243.73 1020 578371 07/12/00 499 DEBBIE O'NEILL 5806249 PROF SVCS 7/13/00 0.00 160.00 1020 578372 07/12/00 1409 THE RAPIDS WATERSLIDE 5806349 PARKING 7/14/00 0.00 50.00 1020 578373 07/12/00 1342 VESTA WALDEN 1106248 PROF SVCS 7/13/00 0.00 160.00 1020 578374 07/14/00 545 JEFF PISERCHIO 5606640 PROF SVCS 0.00 1790.00 1020 578375 07/14/00 4 A T & T 1108501 1020 578375 07/14/00 4 A T & T 1108501 1020 578375 07/14/00 4 A T & T 1108501 1020 578375 07/14/00 4 A T & T 1108501 1020 578375 07/14/00 4 A T & T 1108501 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578376 07/14/00 1503 578377 07/14/00 9 1020 578377 07/14/00 9 1020 578377 07/14/00 9 1020 578377 07/14/00 9 1020 578377 07/14/00 9 1020 578377 07/14/00 9 1020 578377 07/14/00 9 1020 578377 07/14/00 9 1020 578377 07/14/00 9 1020 578377 07/14/00 9 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578378 07/14/00 13 1020 578378 07/14/00 13 1020 578378 07/14/00 13 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578379 1020 578380 1020 578381 1020 578382 1020 578382 TOTAL CHECK / 578383 07/14/00 1680 07/14/00 36 07/14/00 888 07/14/00 1940 07/14/00 1940 07/14/00 M A TO Z TREE NURSERY 1108303 ABAG POWER PURCHASING 1108507 AB~ POWER PURCHASING 1108503 ABAG POWER PURCHASING 1108501 ABAG POWER PURCHASING 1108508 ABAG POWER PURCHASING 1108509 ABAG POWER PURCHASING 5606620 ABA~ POWER PURCI~ING 5708510 ABAG POWER PURCHASING 1108505 A~ POWER PURCH~ING 1108504 ABAG POWER PURCHASING 1108506 ACME & SONS SANITATION C 1108321 A(~4E & SONS SANITATION C 1108303 ACME & SONS SANITATION C 5208003 ADVANTAGE GR~IX 1104000 A~L~N'S PRESS CLIPPING 1103300 ALOHA POOL.MAINTENANCE ! 5708510 AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION EN 5609105 AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION EN 5609105 AMERICAN LEGAL PUBLISHIN 1104300 TELE SVCS MAY-JUN/2000 TELE SVCS MAY-JUN/2000 TELE SVCS MAyoJUN/2000 TELE SVCS MAY 2000 TELE SVCS MAY-JUN/2000 SUPPLIES GAS 6/00 GAS 6/00 GAS 6/00 GAS 6/00 GAS 6/00 GAS 6/00 GAS 6/00 GA~ 6/00 GAS 6/00 GAS 6/00 TOILET RENTAL TOILET RENTAL TOILET RENTAL SUPPLIES CLIPPING 6/00 MAINTENANCE 6/00 RECONSTRUCTION/BBF GOL 60% CO~4PLETION CALF MUNI LAW HANDBOOK 0.00 30.22 0.00 77.50 0.00 30.22 0.00 15.11 0.00 30.22 0.00 183.27 0.00 247.89 0.00 248.23 0.00 488.43 0.00 848.84 0.00 37.48 0.00 40.06 0.00 498.06 0.00 419.34 0.00 158.77 0.00 1378.00 0.00 82.79 0.00 4200.00 0.00 308.26 0.00 2473.20 0.00 90.83 0.00 2872.29 0.00 938.61 0.00 36.00 0.00 427.80 0.00 4320.00 0.00 25920.00 0.00 30240.00 0.00 150.00 RUN DATE 07/14/00 TIME 10:57:01 - FINANCIAL ACCO~HTflNG 07/14/00 CITer OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/10/2000" and "07/14/2000" FUND - 110 - GEI~RAL FUND CASM ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SAL~S TAX PAGE 3 AMOUNT 1020 578384 07/14/00 44 1020 578384 07/14/00 44 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578385 07/14/00 45 1020 578385 07/14/00 45 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578386 07/14/00 1533 1020 578386 07/14/00 1533 1020 578386 07/14/00 1533 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578387 07/14/00 M 1020 578388 07/14/00 57 1020 578389 07/14/00 1903 1020 578389 07/14/00 1903 1020 578389 07/14/00 1903 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578390 07/14/00 71 1020 578390 07/14/00 71 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578391 07/14/00 1947 1020 578392 07/14/00 96 1020 578393 07/14/00 100 1020 578394 07/14/00 103 1020 578395 07/14/00 M 1020 578396 07/14/00 1945 1020 578397 07/14/00 867 1020 578398 07/14/00 106 1020 578399 07/14/00 108 1020 578400 07/14/00 113 1020 578401 07/14/00 M 1020 578402 07/14/00 124 1020 578402 07/14/00 124 RUN DATE 07/14/00 TIME 10:57:02 AMERICAN RED CROSS 5806449 SUPPLIES AMERICAN RED CROSS 1104400 SUPPLIES AMERICAN TRAFFIC SUPPLY 2708404 AMERICAN TRAFFIC SUPPLY 2708404 AN ARRAY OF FLOWERS AN ARRAY OF FLOWERS AN ARRAY OF FLOWERS 5606620 5606620 5606620 ANDRES, MARC 110 A/~K 1104510 ARCRCO 6104800 ARCHCO 6104800 ARCHCO 6104800 B & R ICE CREAM DIST 5606620 B & R ICE CI~ DIST 5606620 BASCOM ANIMAL HOSPITAL 1106647 BLACK MT SPRING WATER 5606620 BMI IMAGING SYSTEMS 1104300 BOOK PUBLISHING COMPAI~Y 1104300 BOOTH, RANA 5700000 BREWER CO~I~ 2708404 BRIAN KANGAS FOULK 4209430 BRIDGE RADIO CO~9~UNICATI 1108501 BROOKS CUPERTINO GLASS 5606660 BRUNSWICK HOMESTEAD LAKE $806349 CALIF DEPT OF PARI~ & RE 5806349 CALIFORNIA SAFE~ AND SU 6308540 CALIFORNIA SAF~'"i~f AND SU 6308540 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REFUND DEPOSIT R4743 EMPLOYEE COFFEE RANDALL CHUN 6/26-7/2 R~ALL CHUN 6/12-6/18 I~ALL C"n~JN 6/19-6/25 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES F_J. m4/TREATMENT SUPPLIES MICROFILMING MUNI CODE SUPPLEMENTS REFUND SUPPLIES PROF SVCS 4/24-5/23 SUPPLIES REPLACE WINDOW ADMISSION PARKING 8/3/00 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 367.00 5.00 372.0C 344.88 146.14 491.02 62.50 26.45 121.55 210.50 500.00 87.70 3400.00 3145.00 3400.00 9945.00 5 465.95 891.70 138.25 193.00 13.53 1785.58 S5.00 486.35 18405.52 44.90 522,68 160.00 40.00 145.27 o7/14/oo ACCOUNTING PERIOD: ~TION CRITERIA: 1/01 CITY OF CUPERTINO CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND transact.trans_date between "07/10/2000" and "07/14/2000" PAGE 4 FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT TOTAL CHECK 0.00 156.85 1020 578403 07/14/00 132 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 1108407 1020 578403 04/14/00 132 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 1108509 1020 578403 07/14/00 132 CALIFORNIA WA/ER SERVICE 1108508 1020 578403 07/14/00 132 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 1108314 1020 578403 07/14/00 132 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 1108407 1020 578403 07/14/00 132 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 1108407 1020 578403 07/14/00 132 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 1108312 1020 578403 07/14/00 132 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 1108312 1020 578403 07/14/00 132 CALIFORNIA WATER 'SERVICE 1108314 1020 578403 07/14/00 132 CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE 1108322 TOTAL CHECK WATER SVCS 6/00 0.00 3719.63 WATER SVCS 5/00 0.00 39.89 WATER SVC$ 6/00 0.00 191.45 WATER SVCS 6/00 0.00 3384.47 WATER SVCS 6/00 0.00 846.12 WATER SVCS 6/00 0.00 120.24 WATER SVCS 6/00 0.00 35.40 WATER SVCS 6/00 0 00 74.12 WATER SVCS 6/00 0.00 765.?9 WATER SVCS 6/00 0.00 27.98 0.00 9205.09 1020 578404 07/14/00 1476 CANNON DESIGN GROUP 110 1020 578404 07/14/00 1476 CANNON DESIGN GROUP 110 1020 578404 07/14/00 1476 CANNON DESIGN GROUP 110 TOTAL CHECK SERVICES IN%; 2083 0.00 330.00 SERVICES INV 20084 0.00 110.00 SERVICES INV 20082 0.00 440.00 0.00 880.00 1020 578405 07/14/00 M CAPENER, CHRISTOPHER 1106647 REIMBURSEMENT 0. O0 125.87 1020 578406 07/14/00 M CAPIO 1101201 578407 07/14/00 1777 LORI CARR 5606620 DUES/L DOMONDON LEE 0.00 125.00 PERFORMER 0.00 540.00 1020 578408 07/14/00 1460 TONI CARREIRO 6104800 WEBSITE UPDATES 6/00 0.00 2475.00 1020 578409 07/14/00 1948 CARROT-TOP INDUSTRIES IN 1106448 SUPPLIES 0.00 111.00 1020 578410 07/14/00 143 CASEY PRINTING INC 1103400 CUPERTINO SCENE 7/00 0.00 2966.00 1020 578411 07/14/00 144 CASH 5606620 1020 578411 07/14/00 144 C.A~H 5606620 TOTAL CHECK PETTY CASH R. EIMBURSEME PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 0.00 0.00 171.15 71.58 242.73 1020 578412 07/14/00 146 CASH 5806349 1020 578412 07/14/00 146 CASH 1106448 1020 578412 07/14/00 146 CASH 5806349 1020 578412 07/14/00 146 C~ 5806449 1020 578412 07/14/00 146 CASH 1106342 TOTAL CHECK PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 73.79 71.95 4.00 30.25 45.01 225.00 1020 578413 07/14/00 M 1020 578414 07/14/00 173 1020 578415 07/14/00 176 1020 578416 07/14/00 1950 578417 07/14/00 183 CMBTA 1104200 COCA-COLABOTTLING OF CA 5606620 COIT CO~ CABLE OPTIONS 1103500 CORRPRO COt4PANIES INC 1108503 COTTON SHIRES & ASSO IN 110 ANNUAL DUES SUPPLIES TIME & MATERIAL COTHODIC PROTECTION SY PROF SVCS R6038 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50.00 68.40 331.00 550.00 1028.00 RUN DATE 07/14/00 TIME 10:57:02 - FIHANCIAL ACCOUNTING 07/14/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 C~ECK REGISTER ~ DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/10/2000" and "07/14/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE 5 AMOUNT 1020 578418 1020 578419 1020 578419 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578420 1020 578420 1020 578420 1020 578420 1020 578420 1020 578420 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578421 1020 578422 1020 578422 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578423 1020 578424 1020 578425 1020 578425 1020 578425 TOTAL CHECK 07/14/00 184 07/14/00 1306 07/14/00 1306 07/14/00 194 07/14/00 194 07/14/00 194 07/14/00 194 07/14/00 194 07/14/00 194 07/14/00 208 07/14/00 890 07/14/00 890 07/14/00 210 07/14/00 676 07/14/00 212 07/14/00 212 07/14/00 212 1020 578426 07/14/00 M 1020 578427 07/14/00 850 1020 578427 07/14/00 850 1020 578427 07/14/00 850 1020 578427 07/14/00 850 1020 578427 07/14/00 850 1020 578427 07/14/00 850 1020 578427 07/14/00 850 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578428 1020 578429 1020 578430 1020 578431 1020 578432 07/14/00 220 07/14/00 223 07/14/00 225 07/14/00 855 07/14/00 M JA~S COURTNEY 5606620 CUPERTINO SANITARY DISTR 4209114 CUPERTINO SANITARY DISTR 4209114 CL~ERTINO SI/PPLY INC 5606640 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 1108407 CUPERTINO S%rPPLY INC 1108407 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 1108315 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 5606640 CUPERTINO SUPPLY INC 1108302 DE ANZA COLLEGE TV CF~ 1101031 DE ANZA PRINTING SERVICE 1103300 DE ANZA PRINTING SERVICE 5208003 DEEP CLIFF ASSOCIATES L 5806449 DEPART~ OF JUSTICE 1104510 DEPT OF CONSERVATION 110 DEPT OF CONSERVATION 110 DEPT OF CONSERVATION 1100000 DEPT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCE 1108005 DIDDA~ A~ING PARTY ST 5806349 DIDDA~ AMAZING PARTY ST 5806349 DIDDA~ i~ING PARTY ST 5806349 DIDDAMS AMAZING PARTY ST 5606620 DIDDA~ A~ING PARTY ST 5806349 DIDD~JV[S ~MvIA~ING P/~TY ST 5806349 DIDDAMS A~ING PARTY ST 5806349 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY 5806349 DON & MIKe'S SWEEPING IN 2308004 DON~.RIGHT ROOFING & GUT 4209206 DULIN ADVERTISINQ INC 1104510 EI~ JO~ 1104100 PERFORMER LATERAL PERMIT SE~R PERMIT S~/PPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 1ST QUARTER PAY~ NEWSLETTERS COPIES RECREATION PROGRAM FINGERPRINTS 5/00 SEISMIC FEES 4/1-6/30 SEISMIC FEES 4/1-6/30 SEISMIC FEES 4/1-6/30 MANIFEST FEE 1/1-12/31 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES STREET SWEEPING 6/00 SERVIC~-S AD/ASST CIVIL ENGINEER S%]BSCRI PTION 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.13 5.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 807.50 300.00 184.00 484.00 8.74 119.76 68.78 72.39 83.87 214.00 567.54 23351.00 110.25 62.00 172.25 13936.00 ,0 1901.20 3451,98 -267,66 5085.52 93,00 50.10 36.75 25.87 53.8S 3.25. 45.78 24.88 240.48 58.09 10175.80 1195.95 901.36 49.00 RUN DATE 07/14/00 TIME 10:S7:03 -17 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING o7/i4/oo ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 'TION CRITERIA: 1/Oi CITY OF CUPERTINO CHECK REGISTER - DISBURS~4ENT FUND transact.trans_da=e between "07/10/2000" and '07/14/2000# FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 578433 07/14/00 930 D£BORA~ ELLIS, ASCA 4249210 07/14/00 240 ELIZABET~ ANN ELLIS 1101070 07/14/00 1473 EMPIRE EQUIPMENT CO 6308540 07/14/00 1473 EMPIR~ EQUIPMENT CO 6308540 1020 578434 1020 578435 1020 578435 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578436 07/14/00 248 ERIK'S DELI CAFE 1108101 1020 578437 1020 578437 TOTAL CHECK 07/14/00 251 07/14/00 251 EVANS WEST VAT.?.~Y SPRAY 1108315 EVANS WEST VALLEY SPRAY 1108315 1020 578438 1020 578438 1020 578438 TOTAL CHECK 07/14/00 1949 EVENT SERVICES 4209206 07/14/00 1949 EVENT SERVICES 1108508 07/14/00 1949 EVENT SERVICES 4209206 1020 578439 1020 578439 1020 578439 · '. CHECK 07/14/00 253 EXCHANGE LINEN SERVICE 5806249 07/14/00 253 EXCHANGE LINEN SERVICE 5606620 07/14/00 253 EXCHANGE LINEN SERVICE 5606620 1020 578440 1020 578440 1020 578440 TOTAL CHECK 07/14/00 255 EXITRONIX 1108501 07/14/00 255 EXITEONIX 1108502 07/14/00 255 EXITRONIX 1108504 1020 578441 1020 578441 TOTAL CHECK 07/14/00 260 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 1107301 07/14/00 260 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 1103500 1020 578442 07/14/00 1946 FISHER SCIENTIFIC 5806349 1020 578443 07/14/00 266 RYAN FORBES 5806449 1020 578444 07/14/00 1210 FORMA TOP 1108501 1020 578445 1020 578445 1020 578445 TOTAL CHECK 07/14/00 268 07/14/00 268 07/14/00 268 FOSTER BROS SECURITY SYS 4209206 FO~-i'~K BROS SECURITY SYS 1108303 FOSTER BROS SECURITY SYS 1108303 1020 578446 1020 578446 1020 578446 1020 578446 TOTAL CHECK 578447 07/14/00 274 07/14/00 274 07/14/00 274 07/14/00 274 07/14/00 277 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... PROF SVCS 6/6/00 TRANSCRIPTION TIME & MATERIAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES TURF SPRAYING TIME & MATERIAL RUN DATE 07/14/00 TIME 10:57:04 14ANDICAP UNIT 5/24-6/2 HANDICAP UNIT 5/24-6/2 6/12-6/30/00 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 STANDARD OVERNIGHT FEDEX 2DAY SUPPLIES RECREATION PRO~RAM SUPPLIES PARTS & SUPPLIES PARTS & SUPPLIES SUPPLIES FRY'S ELECTRONIC 1108503 SUPPLIES FRY'S ELECTRONIC 1108501 SUPPLIES FRY'S ELECTRONIC 1108504 SUPPLIES FRY'S ELECTRONIC 1108408 SUPPLIES JOHN FUNG 5806249 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 FINANCIAL ACCODNTINO PAGE 6 AMOUNT 206.67 425.00 558.34 548.58 1106.92 18.19 3000.00 3000.00 6000.00 238.15 162.37 150.00 550.52 94.33 172.83 204.73 471.89 254.69 254.70 254.70 764.09 66.86 13.40 80.26 141.17 260.80 16.67 21.08 24.02 121,47 166.57 155.14 155.14 155.14 43.25 508.67' 145.00 07/14/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.tran$_date between "07/10/2000" and "07/14/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE 7 1020 578448 07/14/00 1268 GA~LI PRODUCE 5806349 1020 578448 07/14/00 1268 GALLI PRODUCE 5806449 1020 578448 07/14/00 1268 GALLI PRODUCE 5806449 1020 578448 07/14/00 1268 GALLI PRODUCE 5806349 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578449 07/14/00 281 GARDENLAND 6308540 1020 578449 07/14/00 281 GARDENLAND 6308540 1020 578449 07/14/00 281 GARDENLAND 6308540 1020 578449 07/14/00 281 GARDENI,%ND 6308540 1020 578449 07/14/00 281 C44RDEI~ 6308540 1020 578449 07/14/00 281 C~F-~ 6308540 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578450 07/14/00 776 1020 578451 07/14/00 291 1020 578452 07/14/00 292 1020 578453 07/14/00 1335 1020 578454 07/14/00 1276 1020 578454 07/14/00 1276 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578455 07/14/00 298 1020 578455 07/14/00 298 1020 578455 07/14/00 298 1020 578455 07/14/00 298 1020 578455 07/14/00 298 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578456 07/14/00 301 1020 578456 07/14/00 301 1020 578456 07/14/00 301 1020 578456 07/14/00 301 TOTAL C~LECK 1020 578457 07/14/00 899 1020 578458 07/14/00 853 1020 578459 07/14/00 M 1020 578460 07/14/00 322 1020 578461 07/14/00 1410 1020 578461 07/14/00 1410 TOTAL CHECK RUN DATE 07/14/00 TIME 10:57:05 GCS WESTERN POWER & EQUI 6308540 GOLDEN TOUCH LANDSCAPING 1108312 GOLFLAND ENTERTAINMENT C 5806349 DENISE GOSS 5806249 GOURMET EXPRESS 5806449 GOURMET EXPRESS 5806349 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS SUPPLIES SERVICES ADMISSION RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES SUPPLIES GRAINGER INC 1108312 4 SAFETY CABINETS GRAINGER INC 6308540 SUPPLIES GRAINGER INC 6308540 SUPPLIES GRAINGER INC 1108530 SUPPLIES GRAINGER INC 1108530 SUPPLIES 1108501 1108504 4209216 4209216 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC G~AYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.82 2.81 1.82 1.86 3.32 0.99 11.62 GUZZARDO & ASSOCIATES IN 4259313 J~Y HAA~ 1107302 HARRISON, STEPHEN 5806349 HAWKINS TRAFFIC SA~.'~-r~ S 2708404 HILLYARD 5606620 HILLYARD 5706450 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SUPPLIES PARTS & SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 187.86 0.00 18.21 0.00 0.00 206.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PROF SVCS PMT 3 PROF SVCS 6/00 REISSUE LOST CK 48141 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 56.65 14.40 18.60 31.15 120.80 10.76 36.92 23.93 24.36 43.52 12.95 152.44 37.50 18300.00 325.25 50.30 ~0 106.40 146.40 2465.03 32.44 238.81 41.44 23.50 2801.22 310.22 292.57 106.56 230.39 939.V4 494.53 360.00 395.25 587.61 ??2.26 1~a.79 5 07/~4/00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: CTION CRITERIA: 1/oz CITY OF CUP~RTIN0 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND transact.~rans_date between "07/10/2000" and "07/14/2000" FUND - 110 - GENEP. AL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE 8 AMOUNT. 1020 578462 07/14/00 1951 1020 578462 07/14/00 1951 TOTAL CHECK HOMESTEAD F.F.C. INC 5806349 HOMESTEAD F.F.C. INC 5806349 1020 578463 07/14/00 1898 HORIZON 1108321 1020 578463 07/14/00 1898 HORIZON 1108312 1020 578463 07/14/00 1898 HORIZON 1108314 1020 578463 07/14/00 1898 HORIZON 4209526 1020 578463 07/14/00 1898 HORIZON 4209526 1020 578463 07/14/00 1898 HORIZON 1108314 1020 578463 07/14/00 1898 HORIZON 1108408 1020 578463 07/14/00 1898 HORIZON 1108314 1020 578463 07/14/00 1898 HORIZON 4209526 1020 578463 07/14/00 1898 HORIZON 1108314 1020 578463 07/14/00 1898 HORIZON 4209526 1020 578463 07/14/00 1898 HORIZON 1108312 1020 578463 07/14/00 1898 HORIZON 1108303 1020 578463 07/14/00 1898 HORIZON 1108408 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578464 07/14/00 347 INDUSTRIAL WIPER 6308540 578465 07/14/00 1242 INSTY-PRINTS 1101200 1020 578465 07/14/00 1242 INSTY-PRINTS 1101070 1020 578465 07/14/00 1242 INSTY-PRINTS 1104100 1020 578465 07/14/00 1242 INSTY-PRINTS 1107301 1020 578465 07/14/00 1242 INSTY-PRINTS 1108101 1020 578465 07/14/00 1242 INSTY-PRINTS 5606620 1020 578465 07/14/00 1242 INSTY-PRINTS 1104530 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578466 07/14/00 349 INTERIM PERSONNEL 1104300 1020 578466 07/14/00 349 INTERIM PERSONNEL 1104300 1020 578466 07/14/00 349 INTERIM PERSONNEL 1107301 1020 578466 07/14/00 349 INTERIM PERSONNEL 1104300 1020 578466 07/14/00 349 INTERIM PERSONNEL 1107301 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578467 07/14/00 1657 1020 578467 07/14/00 1657 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578468 1020 578469 07/14/00 363 07/14/00 879 07/14/00 372 07/14/00 372 1020 578470 1020 578470 JOSEPHINE'S PERSONNEL SE 1106265 JOSEPHINE'S PERSONNEL SE 1106500 JUST PLAY SPORTS ACADEMY 5806449 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATE 1104001 KINKO'S INC 1106647 KINKO'S INC 5706450 BOWLING BOWLING SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES BUSINESS CARDS BUSINESS CARDS ENVELOPES BUSINESS CARDS BUSINESS CARDS BUSINESS CARDS BUSINESS CARDS SANDRA BERNARD SANDRA BERNARD EVELYN WOLF SANDRA BERNARD SANDRA BERNARD RAFAEL VILLALOBOS RAFAEL VILLALOBOS RECREATION PROGRAM PROF SVCS S/00 SUPPLIES BROCHURES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.19 49.50 0.00 0.00 5.24 0.00 72.64 0.00 5.03 0.00 24.75 104.96 0.00 337.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 140.00 15.00 155.00 220.28 986.62 649.49 522.09 263.50 68.48 160.36 953.32 333.20 65.81 163.71 324.74 1377.24 322.74 6411.58 168.04 73.04 4E.05 4400.32 45.04 183.90 45.17 45.05 4837.57 780.00 312.00 390.00 809.25 234.00 2525.2S 1588.40 608.00 2196.40 9438.50 5030.00 16.24 34.75 S0.99 RUN DATE 07/14/00 TIME 10:57:05 - FINANCIAL ACCO~J~TING 07/14/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.tran$_da%e between "07/10/2000" and "07/14/2000" FU~ - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DE PT 1020 578471 07/14/00 377 PETER KOEHLER 5806249 1020 578472 07/14/00 385 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY 6308540 1020 578473 07/14/00 386 MICHAEL LAMB 5806349 1020 578474 07/14/00 386 MICI-~L LAI4B 5806349 1020 578475 07/14/00 1226 LANDS' END CORPORATE SAL 1101000 1020 578475 07/14/00 1226 LANDS' END CORPORATE SAL 1101000 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578476 1020 578477 1020 578477 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578478 1020 578479 1020 578480 1020 578481 1020 578482 1020 578482 TOTAL CHECK 07/14/00 390 07/14/00 392 07/14/00 392 07/14/00 396 07/14/00 397 07/14/00 400 07/14/00 1263 07/14/00 408 07/14/00 408 1020 578483 07/14/00 1020 578484 07/14/00 1020 578485 07/14/00 1020 578485 07/14/00 1020 578485 07/14/00 1020 578485 07/14/00 1020 578485 07/14/00 1020 578485 07/14/00 1020 578485 07/14/00 1020 578485 07/14/00 TOTAL CHECK LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 1108602 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CIT 1101500 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CIT 1101500 1020 578486 1020 578487 1020 578488 1020 578488 1020 578488 PHILLIP M LENIHAN 5806449 LESLIE'S POOL SUPPLIES I 5606620 LIFETIME TENNIS INC 5706450 AL LOPEZ 5606620 LOS GATOS MEAT & SMOKEHO 5606620 LOS GATOS MEAT & SMOKEHO 5606620 1455 431 431 431 431 431 431 431 431 MARTIN & CHAPMAN CO 5806349 MARTINEZ, MARIA 110 MC WHORTER'S OFFICE PROD 5806349 MC WHORTER'S OFFICE PROD 5806349 MC WHORTER'S OFFICE PROD 5606680 MC WHORTER'S OFFICE PROD 1108601 MC WHORTER'S OFFICE PROD 1108201 MC WHORTER'S OPFICE PROD 1108312 MC WHORT~R'S OFFICE PROD 5806449 MC WHORTER'S OFFICE PROD 1108201 07/14/00 1780 07/14/00 1944 07/14/00 437 07/14/00 437 07/14/00 437 MCCRARY CONS'rUCTION COMP 4249210 METALS ENTERPRISE INC 1103500 METRO NEWSPAPERS 1104300 METRON~WSPAPERS 1104300 METRO N~WSPAPERS 1104300 RUN DATE 07/14/00 TIME 10:57:06 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE 9 AMOUNT RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 70.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 157.95 PROF SVCS 0,00 80.00 STAFF TRAINING 0.00 195.00 CITY LOGO SWEATSHIRT 0.00 45.90 CITY LOGO SHIRTS 0.00 372.85 0.00 418.75 SUPPLIES 0.00 261.48 MUNI LAW HANDBOOK 0.00 PROP 218 IMPLEMENTATIO 0.00 0.00 150.00 40.00 190.00 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 322.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 7.03 TENNIS INSTRUCTION 0.00 14' $0 PERFORMER 0 . 00 400.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 681.83 SUPPLIES 0.00 1167.03 0.00 1848.86 SUPPLIES 0.00 65.15 REFUND DEPOSIT R3498 0.00 500.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 32.05 SUPPLIES 0.00 6.04 SUPPLIES 0.00 75.71 SUPPLIES 0.00 36.25 SUPPLIES 0.00 10.48 SUPPLIES 0.00 $6.27 SUPPLIES 0.00 40.92 SUPPLIES 0.00 20.11 0.00 277.83 SR CTR 99-9201 0.00 350416.80 - FINANCIAL ACCODI~TING SUPPLIES 0.00 10.83 LEGAL PUBLICATION 0.00 32.50 LEGAL PUBLICATION 0.00 3~.50 LEGAL PUBLICATION 0.00 0 07/14/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 10 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CI~CK REGISTER - DISBURSEI~ FUND CTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/10/2000" and "07/14/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 578488 1020 578488 TOTItL CHECK 1020 578489 1020 578489 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578490 1020 578490 1020 578490 1020 578490 1020 578490 1020 578490 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578491 1020 578492 1020 578493 .~-- 578494 1020 578495 1020 578496 1020 578497 1020 578498 1020 578499 1020 578500 1020 578501 1020 578501 1020 578501 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578502 1020 578503 1020 578503 1020 578503 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578504 578505 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT 07/14/00 437 METRO NEWSPAPERS 1104300 07/14/00 437 I~O NEWSPAPERS 1104300 07/14/00 443 07/14/00 443 MILLENNIUM MECHANICAL IN 1108504 MI?.TJRNNIUMMECHANICAL IN 1108501 07/14/00 444 MINTON'S LUMBER 1108312 07/14/00 444 MINTON'S LUMBER 5606620 07/14/00 444 MINTON'S LUMBER 1108501 07/14/00 444 MINTON'S LUMBER 1108303 07/14/00 444 MINTON'S LIMBER 1108509 07/14/00 444 MINTON'S LU~ER 1106448 07/14/00 461 07/14/00 465 07/14/00 470 07/14/00 941 07/14/00 473 07/14/00 474 07/14/00 479 07/14/00 1550 07/14/00 485 07/14/00 487 07/14/00 1681 07/14/00 1681 07/14/00 1681 MORELAND SCHOOL DISTRICT 5806349 MOUNTAIN VIEW GARDEN CEN 1108314 MUSSON THEATRICAL 1106265 MUZAK 1103500 NASER DISTRIBUTORS INC 5606620 NATIONAL BUSINESS FURNIT 1106360 NATURES WOOD ADONIS L NECESITO NEWMAIq TRAFFIC SIGNS NORTHAIRE SUPPLY CO NU-WAYTOOL SUPPLY INC NU-WAYTOOL SUPPLY INC NU-WAYTOOL SUPPLY INC 5606620 1103501 1108602 5708510 1108504 1103500 2809213 07/14/00 499 07/14/00 493 07/14/00 493 07/14/00 493 DEBBIE O'NEILL OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE DEPOT 5606620 5606620 S606620 1107301 07/14/00 495 07/14/00 1190 OFFICE HELPER RONALD OLDS 1106100 1103500 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT LEGAL PUBLICATION 0.00 130.00 LEGAL PUBLICATION 0.00 42.50 0.00 282.S0 SERVICE CALL 0.00 136.32 SERVICE CALL 0.00 1500.00 0.00 1636.32 SUPPLIES 0.00 25.76 SUPPLIES 0.00 28.34 SUPPLIES 0.00 ' 58.78 SUPPLIES 0.00 54.22 SUPPLIES 0.00 29.57 SUPPLIES 0.00 98.09 0.00 294.76 TRANSPORTAT. ION 0.00 341.70 SUPPLIES 0.00 16.24 SUPPLIES 0.00 190.94 MUSIC SVCS JUL-DEC 0.00 317.40 SUPPLIES 0.00 1262.58 SUPPLIES 0.00 251.35 SUPPLIES 0.00 300.39 PROF SVCS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PERFORMER SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 7.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SUPPLIES PROF SVCS 125.00 316.50 96.99 100.00 100.00 70.25 270.25 1035.00 215.10 724.51 27.12 966.73 22.39 270.00 RUN DATE 07/14/00 TIME 10:57:07 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 07/14/00 CI~'Y OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 C}{ECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transac~.~rans_date between "07/10/2000" and "07/14/2000" FUND - 110 - GENER~ FLT~ CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE 11 AMOUNT 1020 578506 07/14/00 503 ORCHARD SUPPLY 5606640 1020 578506 07/14/00 503 ORCHARD SUPPLY 5606620 1020 578506 07/14/00 503 ORC~ SUPPLY 5606640 1020 578506 07/14/00 503 ORC~ SUPPLY 5606620 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORCH~ SUPPLY HARDWAR~ 5208003 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORC~ SUPPLY HA~WAR~ 5708510 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORC~ SUPPLY F2%RDWARE 1108506 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORC~ SUPPLY HARDWA~ 4209216 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORC~ SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108506 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108506 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108312 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108302 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORC"AARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108530 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108508 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108314 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORC~ SUPPLY HARDWAR~ 1108507 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAR~ 4209216 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108303 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY ~RDWARE 2809213 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108408 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORC~ SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108501 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORC~ SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108501 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY H~RDWARE 1108506 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORC~ SUPPLY HARDWA~ 1108303 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108504 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108303 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORC~ SUPPLY H~W~ 1108312 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108501 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108511 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORCH~ SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108321 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORC~ SUPPLY HARDWAR~ 1108507 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORC~ SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108507 1020 578508 07/14/00 1220 ORCHARD SUPPLY ~LARDWA~ 1108504 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578509 1020 578510 1020 578511 1020 578511 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578512 1020 578512 1020 578512 1020 578512 1020 578512 07/14/00 504 07/14/00 1650 07/14/00 507 07/14/00 507 07/14/00 509 07/14/00 509 07/14/00 509 07/14/00 509 07/14/00 509 ORIEi~TALTRADING CO 1106248 OR/~ANDO'S CHRISTMAS T~E 6308540 DAN OSB01~ 1108602 D/~N OSBOR~E 2709435 P W SUPERMARKETS INC 5806349 P W SUPEi~MARK~TS INC 1106342 P W SUPERMARKETS INC 5806349 P W SUPERMARKETS INC 1106343 P W SUPERMARKETS INC 5806349 SUPPLIES 12.78 167.72 ON TIME PMT DISCOUNT 0.00 -5.38 ON TIME PMT DISCOUNT 0.00 -5.38 SUPPLIES 2.21 29.05 14.99 186.01 ON TIME PMT DISCOUNT 0.00 -2.54 ON TIME PMT DISCOUNT 0.00 -2.56 SUPPLIES 0.00 17.62 SUPPLIES 0.00 54.92 ON TIME PMT DISCOUNT 0.00 -2.54 SUPPLIES 0.00 43.95 ON TIME PMT DISCOUNT 0.00 -2.54 ON TIME PMT DISCOUNT 0.00 -2.54 ON TIME PMT DISCOUNT 0.00 -2.54 ON TIME PMT DISCOUNT 0.00 -2.54 SUPPLIES 0.00 7.08 ON TIME PMT DISCOUNT 0.00 -2.54 SUPPLIES 0.00 40.57 ON TIME PMT DISCOUNT 0.00 -2.54 ON TIME PMT DISCOUNT 0.00 -2.54 SUPPLIES 0.00 ~9 ON TIME PMT DISCOUNT 0.00 4 SUPPLIES 0.00 44.90 SUPPLIES 0.00 13.56 SUPPLIES 0.00 34.62 SUPPLIES 0.00 103.96 SUPPLIES 0.00 40.01 ON TIME PMT DISCOUNT 0.00 -2.54 SUPPLIES 0.00 29.15 ON TIME PMT DISCOUNT 0.00 -2.54 ON TIME PMT DISCOUNT 0.00 -2.54 SUPPLIES 0.00 151.51 CREDIT 5/26/00 0.00 -151.51 ON TIME PMT DISCOUNT 0.00 -2.54 0.00 474.91 SUPPLIES 0.00 412.93 SUPPLIES 0.00 82.00 PROGRESS PAYMENT i 0.00 TIME & MATERIALS 0.00 0.00 1400.00 9957.00 11357.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 22'.83 SUPPLIES 0.00 5.96 SUPPLIES 0.00 38.36 SUPPLIES 0.00 14.08 SUPPLIES 0.00 2 RUN DATE 07/14/00 TIM~ 10:57:07 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 07/14/00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: '~ .'TTION CRITERIA: CITY OF CUPERTINO 1/01 C~ECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND ~ransac~.=rans_date between "07/10/2000" and "07/14/2000# PAGE 12 FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 578512 07/14/00 509 1020 578512 07/14/00 509 1020 578512 07/14/00 509 1020 578512 0~/14/00 509 1020 578512 07/14/00 509 1020 578512 07/14/00 509 TOTAL CHECK SUPEI~KETS INC 5806349 SUPERMARKETS INC 5806349 SUPEP~S INC 5806349 SUPERMARKETS INC 5806349 SUPERF~RKETS INC 5806349 SUPERMARKETS INC 5806349 1020 578513 07/14/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108501 ..... DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES TELE SVCS MAY-JUN/2000 SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMOUNT 40.56 5.75 47.80 10.76 26.87 48.73 270.32 34.03 1020 578514 07/14/00 515 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108503 SERVICE CALL 0.00 1116.82 1020 578515 07/14/00 1771 PAGEITET 1108501 1020 578515 07/14/00 1771 PAGEI~T 1108601 1020 578515 07/14/00 1771 PAGENET 1108501 1020 578515 07/14/00 1771 PAGEI~ 1108501 1020 578515 07/14/00 1771 PAGENET 5706450 1020 578515 07/14/00 1771 PAGEI~T 1104510 1020 578515 07/14/00 1771 PAGENET 1108501 1020 578515 07/14/00 1771 PAGENET 1108201 1020 578515 07/14/00 1771 PAGENET 1108102 1020 578515 07/14/00 1771 PAGENET 1108501 ~'" 578515 07/14/00 1771 PAGENET 1107501 578515 07/14/00 1771 PAGENET 6104800 1020 578515 07/14/00 1771 PA~ENET 1108501 1020 578515 07/14/00 1771 PAGENET 1108501 1020 578515 07/14/00 1771 Pi~EI~T 1108501 1020 578515 07/14/00 1771 PAGENET 1106265 TOTAL CHECK PAGER SVCS 6/00 PAGER SVCS 6/00 PAGER SVCS 6/00 PAGER SVCS 6/00 PAGER SVCS 6/00 PAGER SVCS 6/00 PAGER SVCS 6/00 PAGER SVCS 6/00 PAGER SVCS 6/00 P~ER SVCS 6/00 PAGER SVCS 6/00 PAGER SVCS 6/00 PAGER SVCS 6/00 PAGER SVCS 6/00 PAGER SVCS 6/00 PAGER SVCS 6/00 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.91 10.47 10.46 6.03 17.63 39.72 6.03 14.33 27.58' 7.13 7.13 13.76 27.58 6.02 9.91 11.55 225.24 1020 578516 07/14/00 1909 CAROLYN PAGIN 5606620 PERFORMER 0.00 90.00 1020 578517 1020 578517 1020 578517 1020 578517 TOTAL CHECK 07/14/00 1952 PAPA 1108407 07/14/00 1952 PAPA 1108407 07/14/00 1952 PAPA 1108407 07/14/00 1952 PAPA 1108407 SEMINAR/A PRONI SEMINAR/D MAHAN SEMINAR/K WOLFE SEMINAR/T TOLLEFSON 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 55.00 220.00 1020 578518 1020 578518 1020 578518 1020 578518 TOTAL CHECK 07/14/00 526 PENINSUIJ% BLUEPRINT 110 07/14/00 526 PENINSULA BLUEPRINT 4209430 07/14/00 526 PENINSULA BLUEPRINT 1108101 07/14/00 526 PENINSULA BLUEPRINT 110 INV 156373 BLUELINE PRINTS BLUELINE PRINTS INV 157809 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 157.23 145.98 8.12 674.99 986.32 1020 578519 1020 578519 1020 578519 TOTAL CHECK 07/14/00 534 THE PET C~NTRE 1106647 07/14/00 S34 THE PET CENTRE 1106647 07/14/00 534 TH~ PET C~NTRE 1106647 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.33 67.69 12.95 84.97 1020 578520 07/14/00 535 PETE~S-DE LAET INC 6308540 SUPPLIES 0.00 206.21 RUN DATE 07/14/00 TIME 10:57:08 - FIHANCIAL ACCOUNTING 07/14/00 CI~ OF CUPERTINO PAGE 13 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER ~ DISBURSEI~NT F~ SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/10/2000" and "07/14/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 578521 1020 578521 TOT;iL CHECK 1020 578522 1020 578523 1020 578524 1020 578525 1020 578525 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578526 1020 578527 1020 578528 1020 578529 1020 578529 1020 578529 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578530 1020 578530 1020 578530 1020 578530 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578531 1020 578532 1020 578532 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578533 1020 578534 1020 578535 1020 578536 1020 578537 1020 578537 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578538 1020 578538 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 07/14/00 542 PINE CONE LUMBER 1103500 07/14/00 542 PINE CONE LUMBER 1103500 07/14/00 M PROGRESSIVE BUSINESS PUB 1104100 07/14/00 559 PROJECT SENTINEL 1104510 07/14/00 1187 QUA~ 5806349 07/14/00 563 R & R PRODUCTS INC 6308540 07/14/00 563 R & R PRODUCTS INC 6308540 07/14/00 M R~ISSON RESORT 1104530 07/14/00 1406 RAINES CHEVORLET 6308540 07/14/00 M RANDHAWA, NITA 5700000 07/14/00 1071 REPUBLIC ELEC~IC 1108530 07/14/00 1071 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 1108530 07/14/00 1071 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 1108530 07/14/00 845 KEITH .P~R 1108314 07/14/00 845 KEITH ~R 1108501 07/14/00 845 KEITH RET~R 1108503 07/14/00 845 KEITE REaR 5606620 07/14/00 590 07/14/00 600 07/14/00 600 RICH VOSS TEUCKING INC 5208003 ROTO-ROOTER SEWER SERVIC 1108506 ROTO-ROOTER SEWER SERVIC 1108501 07/14/00 602 07/14/00 1417 07/14/00 605 07/14/00 610 07/14/00 1230 07/14/00 1230 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX 07/14/00 617 07/14/00 617 AMOUNT RUN DATE 07/14/00 TIME 10:57:09 SUPPLIES 0.00 64.68 SUPPLIES 0.00 334.22 0.00 398.90 SUBSCRIPTION 0.00 299.00 PROF SVCS 4/1-6/30/00 0.00 DJ JR HIGH DANCE 7/28 0.00 6520.21 500.00 CREDIT 5/30/00 0.00 -9.75 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 47.10 0.00 37.35 0.00 1.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 0:00 0.00 HOTEL PARTS REFUND TIME & MATERIAL TIME & MATERIAL TIME & MATERIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 WANP ABATEMENT EXTERIOR TREATMENT EXTERIOR TREATMENT SERVICES 0.00 COMPOSE TRUCKING 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TIME & MATERIAL TIME & MATERIAL 0.00 0.00 ROYAL COACH TOURS S506549 TRANSPORTATION 6/11 JENNIFER ROZWOOD 5606620 PERFORMER RUSS EIFI~RPRISES INC 2708404 SUPPLIES S & S WORLDWIDE 1106342 SUPPLIES S;~E CHECKS 1104100 PR CHECKS SAFE CHEC~CS 1104100 AP C~CKS SAN JOSE BLUE 110 SAN JOSE BLUB 110 BLUELINE PRINTS BLUELINE PRINTS R3977 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 796.32 24.35 55.00 2010.00 6181.00 69~ ~0 151 ) 500.00 420.00 900.00 200.00 2020.00 700.00 115.70 188.00 303.70 457.72 400.00 844.35 240.48 313.36 488.36 801.72 334.86 8 ~ o7/14/oe AeeOUN~ ~£R~OD: ."T~O~ ~R~T~R~A: CI%'~' OF CUPErTInO C'~4ECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND transact.trans_date between "07/10/2000" and #07/14/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT TOTAL CHECK 1020 578539 07/14/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 2709309 1020 578539 07>14/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 2709435 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578540 07/14/00 626 1020 578541 07/14/00 1249 SANTA CLARA CO DEPT OF R 1102100 SA/TFA CLARA COUNTY 5208003 1020 578542 07/14/00 1636 SANTA CLARA COUNT~ SHERI 1104530 1020 578543 07/14/00 628 1020 578544 07/14/00 635 1020 578545 07/14/00 1146 SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERI 5606620 SANTA CLARA VA?.?.mY WATER 5606640 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 2610000 1020 578546 07/14/00 644 SCREEN DESIGNS 5806349 1020 578546 07/14/00 644 SCREEN DESIGNS 1106442 1020 578546 07/14/00 644 SCREEN DESIGNS 5806349 1020 578546 07/14/00 644 SCREEN DESIGNS 5806349 578546 07/14/00 644 SCREEN DESIGNS 5806449 578546 07/14/00 644 SCI~ DESIGNS 5806349 1020 578546 07/14/00 644 SC~EN DESIGNS 5806349 TOTAL CHECK .. 1020 578547 07/14/00 1488 SEARS 4249210 1020 578547 07/14/00 1488 SF2%RS 1108530 1020 578547 07/14/00 1488 SEARS 6308540 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578548 07/14/00 1749 SHANNON ASSOCIATES 1104510 1020 578548 07/14/00 1749 SHANNON ASSOCIATES 1104510 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578549 07/14/00 651 1020 578549 07/14/00 651 1020 578549 07/14/00 651 TOTAL C~ECK 1020 578~50 07/14/00 1910 1020 578551 07/14/00 1837 1020 S78552 07/14/00 659 1020 578553 07/14/00 1523 ~02.0 578554 07/14/00 200 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPP 1108315 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPP 1108303 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPP 5606640 SILICON SHORES INC 5806449 SILICON V~TJ.~y PAVING CO 2708404 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 5806449 JANASOKAL~ 4209113 LF~LIE SOKOL 5806449 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX 0.00 METER SVCS/TAX GROSS-U 0.00 METER SVCS/TAX GROSS-U 0.00 0.00 PAGE 14 AMOUNT 1202.45 3002.00 3002.00 6004.00 CITATIONS 4/00 0.00 2560.00 RECYCLING/DISPOSAL 0.00 19566.00 FINGERPRINTING 5/00 0.00 60.00 SECURITY 0.00 823.37 WATER SVCS 1/00-6/00 0.00 6452.40 RCF INVES/T4ENT EARNING 0.00 2719.46 NATURE CAMP T SHIRTS 0.00 1442.39 T SHIRTS/VOLUNTEERS 0.00 541.25 T SHIRTS 0.00 1419.43 SHIRTS/SDq~4~R TOTS 0.00 489.83 LIFEGUARD SHIRTS 49.50 649.50 T SHIRTS/CRAZY FOR SPO 0.00 671.15 T SHIRTS/DAY CAMP 0.00 794.01 49.50 6007.56 SUPPLIES 0.00 108.24 SUPPLIES 0.00 224.87 TIRES 0.00 418.85 0.00 751.96 PROF SVCS 0.00 TRAVEL EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 2701.37 3244.33 5945.70 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 109.88 SUPPLIES 0.00 433.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 396.85 0.00 939.73 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 ~ i 0.00 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 PROF SVCS 0.00 RRCI~EATION PROGRAM 0,00 2569.50 52506.21 12227.20 633.40 2226.90 RUN DATE 07/14/00 TIM~ 10:57:10 - FINANCIAL ACCO~ING 07/14/0C CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 15 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FL1ND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/10/2000" and "07/14/2000" FUND - 110 - GENEPJtL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENPOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 1020 578555 07/14/00 877 SOUTHERN LtlMBER CO 5708510 SUPPLIES 0.00 288.05 1020 578556 07/14/00 668 SPINNA](~R SAILING 5806449 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 486.00 1020 578557 07/14/00 671 STANDARD BUSINESS MACHIN 5606680 SUPPLIES 0.00 84.44 1020 578558 07/14/00 1421 STANLEY STEEMER 1108504 1020 578558 07/14/00 1421 STANLEY STEEMER 1108507 1020 578558 07/14/00 1421 STANLEY STEEMER 1108501 TOTAL CHECK TIME & MATERIAL 0.00 490.00 TIME & MATERIAL 0.00 67.00 EMERGENCY EXTRACTION 0.00 2550.00 0.00 3107.00 1020 578559 07/14/00 1027 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY CON 4209216 SUPPLIES 0.00 121.88 1020 578560 07/14/00 1012 STOREFRONT DOOR SERVICE 4209206 EMERGENCY ADA REPAIRS 0.00 6588.00 1020 578561 07/14/00 1576 SUNNYVALE REPTILE 1106647 1020 578561 07/14/00 1576 SUNNYVALE REPTILE 1106647 TOTAL CHECK SUPPLIES 0.00 11.71 SUPPLIES 0.00 104.74 0.00 116.45 1020 578562 07/14/00 1825 SUPERIOR FRICTION 6308540 SUPPLIES 0.00 34.21 1020 578563 07/14/00 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 1020 578563 07/14/00 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 1020 578563 07/14/00 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 1020 578563 07/14/00 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 1020 578563 07/14/00 695 SYSCO .FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 1020 578563 07/14/00 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 1020 578563 07/14/00 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5806349 1020 578563 07/14/00 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5806449 1020 578563 07/14/00 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5806249 1020 578563 07/14/00 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5806249 TOTAL CHECK SUPPLIES 24.39 CREDIT 7/3/00 0.00 SUPPLIES 13.85 SUPPLIES 34.34 CREDIT 7/3/00 0.00 SUPPLIES 30.08 SUPPLIES 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 102.66 1055.22 o' ~9 2. 0 450.63 -178.97 3433.07 656.22 246.22 199.76 515.89 8644.25 1020 578564 07/14/00 698 TAL~Y'S ENTERPRISES 2708403 PROF SVCS 98-107 0.00 43697.99 1020 578565 07/14/00 701 TARGET STORES 5806349 1020 578565 07/14/00 701 TARGET STORES 5806449 1020 578565 07/14/00 701 TARGET STORES 1106448 1020 578565 07/14/00 701 TARGET STORES 5806349 1020 578565 07/14/00 701 TARGET STORES 1106265 1020 578565 07/14/00 701 TARGET STORES 5706450 1020 578565 07/14/00 701 TARGET STORES 5806449 1020 578565 07/14/00 701 TARGET STORES 5806349 1020 578565 07/14/00 701 TARGET STORES 5806349 1020 578565 07/14/00 701 TARGET STORES 5806349 1020 578565 07/14/00 701 TARGET STORES 5806349 1020 578565 07/14/00 701 TARGET STORES 5806349 1020 578565 07/14/00 701 TARGET STORES 1106265 1020 578565 07/14/00 701 TARGET STORES 5806349 1020 578565 07/14/00 701 TARGET STORES 5806349 TOTAL CHECK SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 0.00 2.15 0.00 43.29 0.00 72.75 0.00 252.26 0.00 43~25 0.00 167;29 0.00 142.27 0.00 17.30 0,00 15.84 0.00 17.06 0.00 10.57 0,00 35.24 0.00 21.64 0.00 114.84 0.00 48.24 0.00 I 9 RUN DATE 07114~00 TIME 10:57:10 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 07/14/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 C~CK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND /"~.'TION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/10/2000" and "07/14/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE'DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE 16 AMOUNT 1020 578566 07/14/00 1763 THEATERFUN INC 5806349 1020 578567 0~/14/00 712 TRACTOR EQUIPMENT CO 6308540 1020 578568 07/14/00 719 C~IS TREVISiq~N 5806449 1020 578569 07/14/00 M TRIN~, MAT~ 5606620 1020 578570 07/14/00 727 U S POSTMASTER 5506549 1020 578570 07/14/00 727 U S POSTMASTER 5806249 1020 578570 07/14/00 727 U S POST~U%STER 5806349 1020 578570 07/14/00 727 U S POSTI~TER 5806449 1020 578570 07/14/00 727 U S POSTMASTER 5606600 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578571 07/14/00 961 US BANK 3335304 1020 578571 07/14/00 961 US BANK 3345305 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578572 07/14/00 1445 US GAMES 5806349 578573 07/14/00 738 VAL?.RY OIL COMPANY 6308540 578573 07/14/00 738 VALLEY OIL COMPANY 6308540 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578574 07/14/00 754 BARBARA WALTON 5806449 1020 578575 07/14/00 761 WEDEMEYER BAKERY 5606620 1020 578575 07/14/00 761 WEDEMEYER BAKERY 5606620 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578576 07/14/00 774 1020 578576 07/14/00 774 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578577 07/14/00 1953 1020 578578 07/14/00 800 1020 578579 07/14/00 802 1020 578580 07/14/00 M TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS 1108602 WESTERN MIGHWAY PRODUCTS 1108602 WESTERN PLASTIC PRODUCTS 1106342 Z.A.P. MANUFACTURING INC 2708404 ZEP MANUFACTURING C0~PAN 6308540 ZU0, JEAN 110 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 450.00 TIME & MATERIAL 0.00 904.40 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 REISSUE LOST CK47967 0.00 BULK MAILING 0.00 BULK MAILING 0.00 BULK MAILING 0.00 BULK MAILING 0.00 BULK MAILING 0.00 0.00 4914.90 146.89 1000.00 2600.00 2600.00 2600.00 500.00 9300.00 TRUSTEE FEE 0.00 125.00 SERVICES 74-3 & 74-4 0.00 125.00 0.00 250.00 SUPPLIES FUEL FUEL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 746.80 746.80 746.80 RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REFUND DEPOSIT R6038 48.87 874.04 3423.45 4297.49 192.00 259.84 44.30 304.14 221.48 261.24 482.72 541.93 530.16 79.03 972.00 897026.93 897026.93 897026.93 RUN DATE 07/14/00 TIME 10:57:11 - FINANCIAL A~IN~ 07/13/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE BUSINESS LICENSE REPORT 7/13/2000 RECEIPT DATE BATCM EMPLOYEE CUSTOMER NA~ CHECK NO CHECK AMOUNT. CASH AMOU~ OTHER AMOUNT APPLIED CREDIT T~-~L LN REV CODE CUSTOMER ID DESCRIPT/INVOICE -LN FUND CASH_ACT ORGANIZATION I CRED_ACT PROJECT PROJ_ACT AMOUNT 01000001060 07/13/00 07132000 SOPHYC MIDKNIGHT TUNING & 1757 .00 93.10 .00 .00 93.10 1 1104063 NEW LICENSE BUSINESS LICENSE TAX 110 1020 1100000 4063 93.10 REPORT TOTALS : CHECK AMOUNT CASH AMOUNT OTHER AMOUNT APPLIED CREDIT TOTAL 93.10 .00 .00 .00 93.10 Run Date: 07/14/00 Time: 11:09:15 PENTAMATION ENTERPRISES, INC. - CASH RECEIPTS MANA~"~R RESOLUTION NO. oo-213 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JULY 21, 2000 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: Director of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st day of august . , 2000, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 07/20/00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CITY OF CUPERTINO CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/17/2000" and "07/21/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASM ACCT C~ECK NO 1020 577990 1020 578581 1020 578582 1020 578583 1020 578584 1020 578585 1020 578586 1020 578587 1020 578588 1020 578589 1020 578590 1020 578591 1020 578592 1020 578593 1020 578594 1020 578595 1020 578596 1020 578596 TOTAL Cq4ECK 1020 578597 1020 578597 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578598 1020 578599 1020 578599 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578600 1020 578600 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578601 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 06/16/00 710 07/17/00 710 07/18/00 1090 07/18/00 1090 07/18/00 1090 07/21/00 1350 07/21/00 1503 07/21/00 6 07/21/00 M 07/21/00 1390 07/21/00 28 07/21/00 1940 07/21/00 44 07/21/00 45 07/21/00 M 07/21/00 M 07/21/00 720 07/21/00 720 KAREN TOOMBS 5806249 KAREN TOOMBS 5806249 STAT~ BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 1104300 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 1104300 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 1104300 A & R BOOTH RENTAL 1106248 A TO Z TREE NURSERY 1108321 AAA FENCE COMPANY INC 1106448 ADOBE MAGAZINE 1101201 ADOLPH KIEFER AND ASSOCI 5806449 AIRGAS 1108303 AMERICAN CONSTRUCTION EN 5609105 AMERICAN RED CROSS 1106448 AMERICAN TRAFFIC SUPPLY 1108530 ANAHEIM CONVENTION&VISIT 1101500 BALDE, MARINKO 1100000 BATTERY SYSTEMS 6308540 BATTERY SYSTEMS 6308540 BEN~FITAMERICA 110 BEN~FITAMERICA 110 BROOKS CUPERTINO GLASS 1108507 BSA ARCHITECTS 4249210 BSA ARCHITECTS 4249210 BSN/PASSON'S/GSC SPORTS 5606620 BSN/PASSON'S/GSC SPORTS 5806349 07/21/00 1057 07/21/00 1057 07/21/00 108 07/21/00 872 07/21/00 872 07/21/00 1273 07/21/00 1273 07/21/00 873 DON BUR~mJ~I' 1101000 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... RECREATION PROGRAM REISSUE CK577990 6/16 ANNEXATION RES 00-206 ANNEXATION RES 00-205 ANNEXATION R~S 00-204 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PROF SVCS SUBSCRIPTION SUPPLIES SUPPLIES RECONSTRUCTION BBF GOL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 9/7-9/9/00 C KILIAN REFUND FEES BATTERIES BATTERIES *FLEX DEP *FLEX HLTH TIME & MATERIAL 5/27-6/30/00 PMT 23 5/27-6/30/00 PMT 23 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES MONTHLY INT~RNET ACCES SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.79 7.71 11.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE ! AMOUNT, -5952.20 5952.20 300.00 300.00 300.00 364.36 346.06 1620.00 18.00 190.22 32.12 12~' 00 300.00 177.48 103.50 690.00 49.74 101.16 150.90 769.24 118.65 887.89 420.62 5254.95 4663.76 9918.71 473.54 521.72 995.26 ~0 RUN DATE 07/20/00 TIME 16:57:39 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING o7/2b/oo ACCOUNTING PKRIOD: '~TCTION CRITERIA: 1/01 CITY OF CUPERTINO CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND transact.trans_date between "07/17/2000" and "07/21/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 578601 07/21/00 873 TOTAL CHECK DON BURNETT 1101000 1020 578602 0~/21/00 1101 C.H. BULL CO. 1108530 1020 578602 07/21/00 1101 C.H. BULL CO. 1108530 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578603 07/21/00 127 THE CALIFORNIA CHANNEL 1103500 1020 578604 07/21/00 149 CASH 1107503 1020 578604 07/21/00 149 CASH 1108601 1020 578604 07/21/00 149 CASH 1108602 1020 578604 07/21/00 149 CASH 1106100 1020 578604 07/21/00 149 CASH 1104310 1020 578604 07/21/00 149 CASH 1104100 1020 578604 07/21/00 149 CASH 1101000 10~0 578604 07/21/00 149 CASH 1104400 1020 578604 07/21/00 149 CASH 1107301 1020 578604 07/21/00 149 CASH 6104800 1020 578604 07/21/00 149 CASH 1104510 1020 578604 07/21/00 149 CASH 1104510 1020 578604 07/21/00 149 CASH 1108001 /'~--~ 578604 07/21/00 149 CASH 1107503 578604 07/21/00 149 CASH 1108201 1020 578604 07/21/00 149 CASH 1108601 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578605 07/21/00 152 C~B 1101500 110 1101000 1101000 1020 578606 07/21/00 1156 CHA 1020 578607 07/21/00 823 1020 578607 07/21/00 823 TOTAL CHECK MICHAEL CHANG MICHAEL CHANG 1020 578608 07/21/00 175 1020 578608 07/21/00 175 1020 578608 07/21/00 175 1020 578608 07/21/00 175 1020 578608 07/21/00 175 1020 578608 07/21/00 175 TOTAL CHECK COCA-COLA USA 5606620 COCA-COLA USA 5606620 COCA-COLA USA 5606620 COCA-COLAUSA 5606620 COCA-COLAUSA 5606620 COCA-COLAUSA 5606620 1020 578609 07/21/00 183 1020 578610 07/21/00 1955 1020 578611 07/21/00 1963 1~020 578612 07/21/00 209 578612 07/21/00 209 COTI~ SHIRES & ASSO IN 110 CUPERTINO SENIOR TV GROU 5506549 DALCO ELECTRONICS 1103500 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 5606620 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 5606640 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... MONTHLY INTERN-ET ACCES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES BROADCAST FEE 7/00 P=-l-l'f CASH REIMBUESEME PETTY ~H REI~SE~ PE~ ~H ~I~SE~ PE~ ~H ~I~SE~ P~ ~H REI~SE~ PE~ ~H P='&-rf ~H REI~E~ P~ ~H REI~S~ PE~ ~H ~I~ PE~ ~H REI~S~ PE~ ~H ~I~E~ PE~ ~H ~I~E~ P~ ~H ~I~S~ PE~ ~H ~I~S~ P~'rri ~H ~I~S~ REFERENCE CHA MONTHLY INTERNET ACCES MONTHLY INTERRET ACCES FOUNTAIN MACHINE FOUNTAIN MACHINE FOUNTAIN MACHINE FOUNTAIN MACHINE FOUNTAIN MACHINE FOUNTAIN MACHINE R3154/11837 UPLAND CAMCORDER CLASS SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SVCS 7/00 JANITORIAL SVCS 7/00 SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 2 AMOUNT 15.00 30.00 196.28 98.33 294.61 205.92 25.00 19.50 10.81 37.13 37.35 1.75 25.00 171.34 20.00 47.58 60.06 4.00 3.00 8.65 3.68 2.17 477.02 92.05 85.50 15.00 15.00 30.00 21.65 21.65 27.06 21.65 21.65 21.65 135.31 209.00 115.00 97.90 401.80 401.80 RUN DATE 07/20/00 TIME 16:57:40 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 07/20/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 3 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 C~ECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/17/2000" and "07/21/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERA.L FUND CAS]{ ACCT CHECK NO TOTAL CHECK ISSUE DT .............. ~2NDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 578613 07/21/00 214 1020 578613 07/21/00 214 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578614 1020 578615 1020 578615 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578616 1020 578617 1020 578618 1020 578619 1020 578620 1020 578621 1020 578622 1020 578622 1020 578622 1020 578622 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578623 1020 578624 1020 578625 1020 578626 1020 578626 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578627 1020 578628 1020 578628 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578629 1020 578630 1020 578630 1020 578630 07/21/00 850 07/21/00 1962 07/21/00 1962 07/21/00 1958 07/21/00 240 07/21/00 242 07/21/00 243 07/21/00 1484 07/21/00 M 07/21/00 249 07/21/00 249 07/21/00 249 07/21/00 249 07/21/00 253 07/21/00 1935 07/21/00 1255 07/21/00 274 07/21/00 274 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA 1108602 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA 1108602 DIDDAMS AMAZING PARTY ST 5806349 DIGITAL MAPPING ASSOCIAT 6109853 DIGITAL MAPPING ASSOCIAT 6109853 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY 2708405 ELIZABETH ANN ELLIS 1101070 EMPLOYMENT DEVEL DEPT 110 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 110 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING C 5208003 ERSKINE, JEREMY 1106448 ESBRO CHEMICAL 5606620 ESBRO=CH~MICAL 5606620 ESBRO CHEMICAL 5606620 ESBRO CHEMICAL 5606620 EXC~L~NGE LINEN SERVICE 5806249 EXHIBIT 1106448 FIRST AUTOMOTIVE DISTRIB 6308540 FRY'S ELECTRONIC 1108501 FRY'S ELECTRONIC 1108315 07/21/00 1932 GAME TIME 4209108 07/21/00 281 GARDENLAND 1108408 07/21/00 281 GARDENLAND 1108408 07/21/00 776 07/21/00 298 07/21/00 298 07/21/00 298 GCS WESTEI~N POWER & EQUI 2308402 GRAINGER INC 1108501 GRAINGER INC 1108503 GRAINGER INC 1108503 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SAFETY LIGHTING 4/00 SAFETY LIGHTING 5/00 SUPPLIES AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY GROUND CONTROL SUPPLIES TRANSCRIPTION SIT SDI PROF SVCS 1/1-5/31/00 REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES TIME & MATERIAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SHORT PAID PO 30285 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.19 79.19 0.00 3.22 26.73 0.00 AMOUNT. 803.60 120.23 118.79 239.02 28,94 10500.00 11750.00 22250.00 427.76 425.00 15135.80 665.60 12065.00 86 522.24 415.44 342.42 186.52 1466.62 13.30 238.15 34.85 118.91 140.17 259.08 1387.21 501.92 1039.11 1541.03 50.00 42.32 350.80 ~2 RUN DATE 07/20/00 TIME 16:57:41 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 07/20/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND "~--CTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between #07/17/2000" and "07/21/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT ..... DESCRIPTION SALES TAX PAGE 4 AMOUNT 1020 578630 07/21/00 298 GRAINGER INC 1108501 1020 578630 07/21/00 298 GRAINGER INC 1108501 1020 578630 07/21/00 298 GRAINGER INC 1108501 TOTAL CHECK SUPPLIES C~EDIT 6/29/00 SUPPLIES 4.70 0.00 12.31 46.96 61.78 -61.78 161.66 1030.00 1020 578631 07/21/00 1614 HEIDE'S HAY SA/~ES 1106248 SUPPLIES 0.00 97.43 1020 578632 07/21/00 334 1020 578632 07/21/00 334 1020 578632 07/21/00 334 1020 578632 07/21/00 334 1020 578632 07/21/00 334 1020 578632 07/21/00 334 1020 578632 07/21/00 334 1020 578632 07/21/00 334 1020 578632 07/21/00 334 1020 578632 07/21/00 334 1020 578632 07/21/00 334 1020 578632 07/21/00 334 1020 578632 07/21/00 334 TOTAL CHECK ~" 578633 07/21/00 1951 578633 07/21/00 1951 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578634 07/21/00 336 HOME DEPOT/GECF HOME DEPOT/GECF HOME DEPOT/GECF HOME DEPOT tGECF HOME DEPOT tGECF HOl~ DEPOT/GECF HOME DEPOT ?GECF HOME DEPOT ?GECF HOME DEPOT IGECF HOME DEPOT ~GECF HOME DEPOT IGECF HOME DEPOT ~GECF HOME DEPOT ~GECF HOMESTEAD F.F.C. INC HOMESTEAD F. F.C. INC HUMANE SOCIETY OF SANTA 1106248 1108530 5606620 5708510 1108303 5606620 1103500 1103500 1108503 5606620 4209216 1108501 4209216 5806349 5806349 1104530 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CREDIT 6/7/00 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES BOWLING BOWLING FIELD SVCS/SHELTER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.90 184.05 278.88 19.55 186.55 170.09 -10.78 44.49 51.70 66.73 38.45 15.27 50.21 1108.09 190.00 210.00 400.00 5984.00 1020 578635 07/21/00 341 ICE CHitLET 5806349 ADMISSION 0.00 209.25 1020 578636 1020 578637 07/21/00 343 07/21/00 1847 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-45 110 THE IDEA BROKERS 5606620 *ICMA SUPPLIES 0.00 159.65 6737.61 2154.71 1020 578638 07/21/00 1892 IMATION 11O8101 SERVICE AGMT 0.00 999.00 1020 S78639 1020 578639 1020 578639 TOTAL CHECK 07/21/00 995 INSERV COMPANY 07/21/00 995 INSERV COMPANY 07/21/00 995 INSERV COMPANY 1108504 1108502 1108501 WATER TREATMENT 7/00 WATER TREATMENT 7/00 WATER TREATMENT 7/00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 159.49 159.49 159.49 478.47 1020 578640 1020 S78641 07/21/00 1087 IPMA 07/21/00 353 IRON MOUNTAIN 1104510 1104300 AG~I~CYMEMBEI~HIP RECORD STORAGE 0.00 0.00 269.00 157.47 1020 578642 1020 578643 1020 578643 1020 578643 ! L CHECK 07/21/00 354 07/21/00 857 07/21/00 857 07/21/00 857 J C'RAWFORD & ASSOCIATES 5906449 SANDRAJAMES 1101000 SANDHAJAMES 1101000 S~uNDRAJAMES 1101000 SUPPLIES MONTHLY INTERNET ACCES MONTHLY INTERNET ACCES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 266.06 15.00 15.00 59.21 89.21 RUN DATE 07/20/00 TIM~ 16:57:41 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 07/20/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOL~TTING PERIOD: 1/01 C~CK R~GISTER - DISBL~F2~ FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.tran$_date between "07/17/2000" and "07/21/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENPOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE 5 AMOUNT 1020 578644 07/21/00 806 1020 578645 07/21/00 1657 1020 578645 07/21/00 1657 TOT;iL CHECK 1020 578646 07/21/00 1437 1020 578646 07/21/00 1437 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578647 07/21/00 369 1020 578648 07/21/00 372 1020 578649 07/21/00 1129 1020 578650 07/21/00 385 1020 578651 07/21/00 391 1020 578652 07/21/00 398 1020 578653 07/21/00 1658 1020 578654 07/21/00 404 1020 578655 07/21/00 405 1020 578656 07/21/00 1855 1020 578657 07/21/00 424 1020 578658 07/21/00 1356 1020 578659 07/21/00 1330 1020 578660 07/21/00 900 1020 578660 07/21/00 900 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578661 07/21/00 1383 1020 578662 07/21/00 1023 1020 578663 07/21/00 461 1020 578663 07/21/00 461 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578664 07/21/00 465 1020 578664 07/21/00 465 WENDEL~L JA~S JOHNSON JR 1108303 JOSEPHINE'S PERSONITEL SE 1106265 JOSEPHINE'S PEIASOITNEL SE 1106500 THE J~JNGLE 5806349 THE JUNGI~ 5806349 KELLY-MOORE PAIN~ CO INC 1108830 KINKO'S INC 5806449 S~ KRITZER 1106248 I2%B SAFETY SUPPLY 1108504 LEAG~ OF CALIF CITIES 1101500 LEXIS LAW PUBLISHING 1101500 LI%'IV~ER MEI~DELSON P C 1104511 LONGS DRUG STORES #260 5806349 LONGS DRUGS #114 1108601 SUSAN MACGOWAN 1104510 MARC~ %~A%~L 5506549 ~T'~ BENDER & COMP~ 1101500 MCCL~ AUDIO VISUAL 1106448 MESITI-MILLER ENGINEERIN 1108503 MESITI-MILLER ENGIN~ERIN 1108501 MITCHEL~ BROS AUTO PARTS 6308540 MASSOUD MOD~HEDI 1107502 MOREI2tND SCHOOL DISTRICT 5806349 MOREL4~/~D SCHOOL DISTRICT 1106343 MOUNTAIN VIEW GARDEN C~N 1108312 MOUNTAIN VIEW GARDEN CRN 1108315 TI~ & MA~RIAL 0.00 725.00 P~A~L VILJ~ALOBOS 0.00 634.60 PJ%FA~L VILLALOBOS 0.00 304.00 0.00 938.60 ADMISSION 0.00 108.90 ADMISSION 0.00 178.20 0.00 287.10 SUPPLIES 0.00 262.83 SUPPLIES 39.77 521.77 PERFORI~R 7/27/00 0.00 600.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 210.36 REGIS~RATION/C KILI;tN 0.00 365.00 CA DEER ADV CODE SER 0.00 69.69 SCOTT NEMETZ CASE 0.00 3 9 SUPPLIES 0.00 13.07 SUPPLIES 0.00 6.39 REIMBURSF~ 0.00 193.13 EASTERN EUROPE/W HALL 0.00 5239.59 0010034720 0.00 51.74 PROP SVCS 0.00 4742.00 SERVICES THRU 6/25/00 0.00 339.50 SERVICES THRU 6/25/00 0.00 7590.90 0.00 7930.40 PARTS 0.77 10.09 P~ REVIEW SERVICES 0.00 74869.50 · "RANSPORTATION 0.00 554.60 TR~SPORTATION 6/30/00 0.00 271.20 0.00 825.80 SUPPLIES 0.00 125.36 SUPPLIES 0.00 ~8 RUN DATE 07/20/00 TIME 16:57:42 - FIN~CIAL ACCO%~TINO 07/20/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 6 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 C~CK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND TTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/17/2000" and "07/21/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT TOTAL CHECK 1020 578665 07/21/00 475 NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION RE 1108312 1020 578666 07/21/00 192 1020 578666 07/21/00 192 1020 578666 07/21/00 192 1020 578666 07/21/00 192 1020 578666 07/21/00 192 1020 578666 07/21/00 192 TOTAL C"~ECK NOVAC~ OCCUPATION;Lb HE 5806449 NOVACAR~ OCCUPATIONAL HE 5806449 NOVACAR~ OCCLTPATIONAL NE 5806449 NOVACARE OCCUPATIONAL HE 5806449 NOVACARE OCCUPATIONAL HE 5806449 NOVACARE OCCUPATIONAL NE 5806449 1020 578667 07/21/00 1961 OAK~ TOI/RS PROGP, Ja. MS 5506549 1020 578668 07/21/00 1829 JOA~'NE OKAZA~I 1104100 1020 578669 1020 578669 TOTAL CHECK 07/21/00 500 07/21/00 500 OPERATING ENGINEERS 1104510 OPERATING ENGINEERS 110 1020 578670 07/21/00 501 ~'--'~ 578671 07/21/00 981 578671 07/21/00 981 1020 578671 07/21/00 981 1020 578671 07/21/00 981_ 1020 578671 07/21/00 981 1020 578671 07/21/00 981 1020 578671 07/21/00 981 1020 578671 07/21/00 981 1020 578671 07/21/00 981 1020 578671 07/21/00 981 1020 578671 07/21/00 981 TOTAL CHECK OPERATING ENGINEERS #3 110 ORCH~.RD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY F3~LDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCF~%RD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY FJLRDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE 1108303 1108315 1108312 1108303 1108312 1108315 1108315 2708405 2708405 2708404 1108321 1020 578672 1020 578672 TOTAL CHECK 07/21/00 5O7 07/21/00 507 DAN OSBORNE DAN OSBORNE 4209216 1108830 1020 578673 1020 578673 1020 578673 1020 578673 1020 578673 1020 578673 TOTAL CHECK 07/21/00 833 07/21/00 833 07/21/00 833 07/21/00 833 07/21/00 833 07/21/00 833 PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS PERS 110 110 110 110 110 110 1020 578676 1020 578676 ~!~0 578676 578676 07/21/00 511 07/21/00 511 07/21/00 511 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL PACIFIC BELL PACIFIC BELL PACIFIC BELL 5606620 5706450 1108601 1108602 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX 0.00 FENCE RENTAL 6/27-7/25 0.00 AMOUNT 209.64 41.65 PPD T~/K TJ;LDER 0.00 15.00 PPD TB/J ALLEN 0.00 15.00 PPD TB & XRAY 0.00 60.00 PPD TB/D KONG 0.00 15.00 PPD TB/J TFJLLLS 0.00 15.00 PPD TB/S COLLINS 0.00 15.00 0.00 135.00 TOUR 8/3/00 REIMBURSEMENT HLTH/WELFARE PW RETIRE HLTH/WELFARE PW EMP UNION DUES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TIME & MATERIAL TIME & MATERIAL PERS EMPLY *PERS BYBK PERB 1959 *PSRS BYBK PEPS SPEC PER~ BUYBK TELEPHONE SERVICE TEIJ~PHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE SO,O0 81.48 3576.00 5515.00 9091.00 415.50 85.45 27.84 32.98 36.56 496.42 276.21 407.28 170.76 143.64 43.26 38.80 1759.20 1685.00 1200.00 2885.00 21227.99 394.68 71.61 305.65 155.71 67.68 22223.32 406.13 487.36 121.84 162.45 RUN DATE 07/20/00 TIME 16:57:43 - FINANCXAL ACCOt~ITXNG 07/20/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 7 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 C"~ECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: ~ransact.~rans_date between "07/17/2000" and "07/21/2000" FUND - 110 - GENER~kL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 5208003 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 2308004 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1106265 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108201 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 6104800 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 5606620 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 5606640 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 5708510 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1106265 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1107301 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108504 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108511 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1106647 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108508 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108509 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108504 102'0 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108407 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108706 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1101200 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1101000 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1102100 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1101500 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1i04300 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1103300 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1103500 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1104000 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1104100 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1104200 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1104510 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1106647 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1104530 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1104400 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1106100 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1106265 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1106529 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1106500 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1107200 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1107301 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1107302 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1107501 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1107502 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1107503 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108001 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108101 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108102 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1106265 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108501 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108503 1020 578676 07/21/00 511 PACIFIC BELL 1108507 TOTAL CHECK ..... DESCRIPTION ...... TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONE SERVICE SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ~OL~rT 40.61 40.61 121.84 438.16 771.65 361.57 198.10 324.90 284.29 81.23 162.45 81.23 365.52 57.54 51.78 32.27 15.14 81.23 121.84 243.68 203.07 446.74 3r ~2 121.84 121.84 243.68 121.84 243.68 40.61 284.29 121.84 121.84 649.81 40.61 487.36 121.84 365.52 81.23 527.97 40.61 162.45 203.07 380.38 40,61 121.87 1010,04 1114,24 133.01 13041.16 RUN DATE 07/20/00 TIME 16:57:44 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 07/20/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND -- 'CTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_da=e between .07/17/2000" and "07/21/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAJ~ FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 578677 1020 578677 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578678 1020 578679 1020 578680 1020 578681 1020 578682 1020 578683 1020 578683 1020 578683 1020 578683 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578684 1020 578684 ?~'L CHECK 1020 578685 1020 578685 1020 578685 1020 578685 1020 578685 TOTAL C~ECK 1020 578686 1020 578687 1020 578688 1020 578689 1020 578690 1020 578691 1020 578692 1020 578693 1020 578694 ~o 578695 ISSUE DT ............. ~VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT 07/21/00 526 PENINSULA BLUEPRINT 4209430 07/21/00 526 PENINSULA BLUEPRINT 4209430 07/21/00 531 07/21/00 533 07/21/00 1392 07/21/00 546 07/21/00 561 07/21/00 1759 07/21/00 1759 07/21/00 1759 07/21/00 1759 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 5806249 PER$ LONG TERM CARE PROG 110 PINE PRESS 1106448 PITNEY BOWES INC 1104310 PYRO SPECTACULARS INC 1106448 R GUNN CONSTRUCTION INC 1108302 R GUNN CONSTRUCTION INC 1108506 R G'dNN CONSTRUCTION INC 2709435 R GUNN CONSTRUCTION INC 2709435 07/21/00 575 07/21/00 575 RECYCAL SUPPLY 5208003 RECYCAL SUPPLY 5208003 07/21/00 581 RELIABLE 1107501 07/21/00 581 RELIABLE 1107301 07/21/00 581 RELIABLE 1107503 07/21/00 581 RELIABLE 1107501 07/21/00 581 RELIABLE 1107503 07/21/00 1071 07/21/00 845 07/21/00 602 07/21/00 610 07/21/00 611 07/21/00 1389 07/21/00 959 07/21/00 622 07/21/00 1360 07/21/00 1488 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 1108530 KEITH REUTER 1108506 ROYAL COACH TOURS 5506549 S & S WORLDWIDE 5806349 S C CO TRANSPORTATION 5506549 SAN FRANCISCO SHAKESPEAR 1106248 SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS 5506549 SAN JOSE METROPOLITAN BA 1106448 SANTA CLARA ~qIFIED SCHO 5806349 SEARS 2708405 RUN DATE 07/20/00 TIME 16:57:44 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... BLUELINE PRINTS BLUELINE PRINTS SUPPLIES PEPS LTC 4TN OF JULY PROGRAMS POSTAGE METER RENTAL FIREWORKS DISPLAY ROAD BUMP/MCCLELLAN PK ROAD BUMP/MCCLELLAN PK ROAD BUMP/MCCLELLAN PK BOLLINGER & PORTAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES TIME & MATERIAL TIME & MATERIAL TRANSPORTATION 6/28/00 SUPPLIES MONTHLY FLASH PASS SHAKESPEARE IN THE PAR SUBSCRIPTION D-0340677 TRANSPORTATION SUPPLIES SALE~ TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 212.13 -212.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - FINANCIAL ACCO%~TING AMOUNT 50.28 132.28 182.56 452.50 313.38 1450.55 409.51 15000.00 1000.00 1000.00 107.00 11242.00 13349.00 3525.38 -3525.38 0.00 71.98 110.91 110.92 12.97 357.33 1992.25 250.00 339.25 97.16 99.00 20000.00 31.02 400.00 307.00 50.80 07/20/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 9 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURS£MENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.~rans_date between #07/17/2000" and "07/21/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 1020 578696 07/21/00 651 1020 578696 07/21/00 651 1020 578696 07/21/00 651 TOT;iL CHECK SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPP 5606640 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPP 5606640 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPP 1108303 SUPPLIES 0.00 124.49 SUPPLIES 0.00 170.55 SUPPLIES 0.00 433.00 0.00 728.04 1020 578697 07/21/00 652 SIERRA SPRING WATER COMP 1101500 WATER 5/31-6/28/00 0.00 17.17 1020 578698 07/21/00 1152 KIM MARIE SMITH 1101000 REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 148.30 1020 578699 07/21/00 1954 SPHERION CORPORATION 1104300 SA~IDRABERN~%RD 0.00 703.56 1020 578700 1020 578700 1020 578700 1020 578700 1020 578700 1020 578700 1020 578700 1020 578700 1020 578700 1020 578700 1020 578700 1020 578700 TOTAL C~ECK 07/21/00 1011 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 270 07/21/00 1011 STATE BOARD OF EQUALI~AT 220 07/21/00 1011 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 580 07/21/00 1011 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 520 07/21/00 1011 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 420 07/21/00 1011 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 560 07/21/00 1011 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 110 07/21/00 1011 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 630 07/21/00 1011 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 580 07/21/00 1011 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 110 07/21/00 1011 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 560 07/21/00 1011 STATE BO~RD OF EQUALIZAT 5700000 APR-JUN 2000 0.00 APR-JUN 2000 0.00 APR-JUN 2000 0.00 APR-JUN 2000 0.00 APR-JUN 2000 0.00 APR-JI]N 2000 0.00 APR-JUN 2000 0.00 APR-JUN 2000 0.00 APR-JUN 2000 0.00 PREPAYMENT 0.D0 APR-JUN 2000 0.00 APR-JUN 2000 0.00 0.00 258.12 19.87 204.75 7.52 313.78 414.15 763.73 160.75 86,37' -3191,00 4487,03 3[ J 1020 578701 1020 578702 1020 578702 TOTAL CHECK 07/21/00 677 07/21/00 295 07/21/00 295 STATE.~TR~ET BALK & TRUS 110 GORDY STROUD 1108314 COP. DY STROUD 1108314 'PEPS DEF RESURFACE TENNIS COURT TIM~ & MATERIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 842.14 7170.00 4022.00 11192.00 1020 578703 07/21/00 M2001 SUM, JOYCR 58O RECREATION REFUND 0.00 43.00 1020 578704 07/21/00 690 SUNNYVALE FORD 6308540 PARTS 0.99 12.96 1020 578705 1020 578705 TOTAL CHECK 07/21/00 695 07/21/00 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5806249 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5506549 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 279.75 277.17 556.92 1020 578706 1020 578706 1020 578706 TOTAL CHECK 07/21/00 698 07/21/00 698 07/21/00 698 TALLY'S ENTERPRISES 1108314 TALLY'S ENTERPRISES 1108303 TALLY'S ENTERPRISES 1108830 TIME & MATERIAL TIME & MATERIAL TIME & MATERIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1954.75 1925.00 500.00 4379.75 1020 578707 1020 578707 1020 578707 TOTAL CHECK 07/21/00 700 07/21/00 700 07/21/00 700 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108303 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108302 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108407 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES FIELD DAY 3 O $35EA 44.02 120.65 0.00 164.67 577.58 1583.05 105.00 2265.63 1020 578708 1020 578708 07/21/00 701 07/21/00 701 TARGET STORES 5606620 SUPPLIES TARGET STORES 5606620 SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 23.27 RUN DATE 07/20/00 TIME 16:57:45 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTIN~ 07/20/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE l0 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK R~GISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND CRITERIA: transact.frans_date between "07/17/2000" and "07/21/2000" FUND - 110 - GE~TERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 578708 07/21/00 701 TARGET STOR~S 5806249 1020 578708 07/21/00 701 TARGET STORES 5806349 1020 578708 07/21/00 701 TARGET STORES 5806449 1020 578708 09/21/00 701 TARGET STORES 5706450 1020 578708 07/21/00 701 TARGET STORES 1106448 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578709 07/21/00 M2001 THE KIPLINGER CALIFORNIA 1101200 1020 578710 07/21/00 718 TREE MOVERS 110B315 1020 578711 07/21/00 M TSENG, PAO FEN 1100000 1020 578712 07/21/00 724 1020 578712 07/21/00 724 1020 578712 07/21/00 724 TOTAL CHECK TURF & INDUSTRIAL EQUIPM 1108830 TURF & INDUSTRIAL EQUIPM 6308540 TURF & INDUSTRIAL EQUIPM 1108830 1020 578713 07/21/00 1154 UNITED WAY OF S;~NTA CLJ%R 110 1020 578714 578715 578715 1020 578715 1020 578715 TOTAL CHECK 07/21/00 1445 US GAMES 07/21/00 749 VISA 07/21/00 749 VISA 07/21/00 749 VISA 07/21/00 749 VISA 5806349 6104800 1104001 6104800 1102100 1020 578716 1020 578716 1020 578716 1020 578716 TOTAL CHECK 07/21/00 749 VISA 07/21/00 749 VISA 07/21/00 749 VISA 07/21/00 749 VISA 1101000 1101200 1103300 1101300 1020 578717 1020 578718 1020 578719 1020 578719 TOTAL CHECK 07/21/00 749 07/21/00 302 07/21/00 779 07/21/00 779 VISA 1101200 WASHINGTON MUTUAL 110 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO INC 1108503 WEST-LITE SUPPLY CO INC 1108503 1020 578720 1020 578721 1020 578722 1020 578723 578724 07/21/00 M2001 07/21/00 1957 07/21/00 951 07/21/00 794 07/21/00 795 WILLIAMSON, LAURIE 5600000 WIRELESS WORLD 1108315 WOOLWORTH NURSERY 1108312 X~ROX CORPORATION 1104310 X~ROX CORPORATION 1104310 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT SUPPLIES 0.00 10.77 SUPPLIES 0.00 21.30 SUPPLIES 0.00 23.70 SUPPLIES 0.00 41.50 SUPPLIES 0.00 64.79 0.00 203.25 SUBSCRIPTION TIME & MATERIAL OVERPAYMENT CITATION CREDIT 5/11/00 TIME & MATERIAL SUPPLIES UNITED WAY S~/PPLIES SUPPLIES AOL SUPPLIES AOL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PHOTO PROCESSING RETIREMENT GIFT/D BROW LUNCH MEETING *WASHMUTL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 88.41 70.57 OVERPAYMENT/ADMISSION CLARION AM/FM CD PLAYE SUPPLIES BASE C~ARGE LEASE AGR~-MENT 73.00 11250.00 303.00 -54.13 6363.50 217.80 6527.17 37.50 87.45 1166.89 43.90 1749.66 21.95 2982.40 78.59 229.64 9.71 332.74 650.68 38.45 17243.38 116.52 164.58 281.10 35.00 266.86 71.11 1159.94 926.04 RUN DATE 07/20/00 TIME 16:57:46 - FINANCIAL ACCO%~qTING 07/20/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 C~ECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/17/2000" and "07/21/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 578725 1020 578726 1020 578727 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT 07/21/00 1608 ZACK ELECTRONICS INC 1103500 07/21/00 1558 JOSE ZUNIGA JR 1106265 07/21/00 575 RECYCAL SUPPLY 5208003 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX SUPPLIES SECURITY SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 212.13 874.61 874.61 874.61 PAGE ii AMOUNT 93.76 150.00 3313.25 385837.37 385837.37 385837.37 RUN DATE 07/20/00 TIME 16:S7:46 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING RESOLUTION NO. 00o21z~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING JULY 28, 2000 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and fi.om the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: Director of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21 s r day of A.ugust ,2000, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 07/27/00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CITY OF CUPERTINO C~ECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND PAGE SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/24/2000" and "07/28/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX 1020 577515 V 05/26/00 M TROGISCH, ERNA 580 RECREATION REFUND 3205 0.00 -35.00 1020 577937 V 06/16/00 536 AN~ MARIE PETERSON 5806249 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 -727.20 1020 578510 V 07/14/00 1650 ORI~'S CHRISTMAS TREE 6308540 SUPPLIES 0.00 -82.00 1020 578568 V 07/14/00 719 CHRIS TREVISAN 5806449 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 -4914.90 1020 578728 07/24/00 857 SANDRA JAMES 1101000 HOTEL & PERDEIM 0.00 580.00 1020 578729 07/24/00 1630 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INC 5806449 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 4914.90 1020 578730 07/24/00 392 LEAG73E OF CALIFOP, NIA CIT 1101000 REGISTRATION/S JAMES 0.00 300.00 1020 578731 07/24/00 505 ORLANDI TRAILER 6308540 SUPPLIES 0.00 82.00 1020 578732 07/24/00 536 ANNE MARIE PETERSON 5806249 1020 578733 07/24/00 M TROGISCH, ERNA 580 R~ISSUE CK 577937 6/16 REISSUE CK 577515 5/26 0.00 727.20 0.00 35.00 1020 578734 07/28/00 1695 3M 2708405 1020 578734 07/28/00 1695 3M 1108602 1020 578734 07/28/00 1695 3M 1108602 1020 578734 07/28/00 1695 3M 2708405 1020 578734 07/28/00 ~695 3M 1108602 1020 578734 07/28/00 1695 3M 2708405 1020 578734 07/28/00 1695 3M 2708405 TOTAL CHECK SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CREDIT 6/21/00 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 0.00 650.01 0.00 802.00 0.00 ~ "9 0.00 21 i 0.00 -4993,52 0.00 963,34 0.00 1787,55 0.00 1397,38 1020 578735 07/28/00 7 1020 578736 07/28/00 13 ABAG PLAN CORPORATION 1104540 ACME & SONS SANITATION C 5606640 CHIEH CLAIM/FINAL PMT PORTABLE TOILET 0.00 10319.32 0.83 168.83 1020 578737 07/28/00 18 ADONA OIL CORPORATION 2708405 1020 578738 07/28/00 M2001 AICPA 1104000 1020 578739 07/28/00 29 LYNNE DIA~{E AITKEN 5806449 DISPOSAL HAZ WASTE MEMBERSHIP DUES RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 7873.21 0.00 125.00 0.00 115.00 1020 578740 07/28/00 1884 1020 578740 07/28/00 1884 1020 578740 07/28/00 1884 1020 578740 07/28/00 1884 1020 578740 07/28/00 1884 1020 578740 07/28/00 1884 1020 578740 07/28/00 1884 1020 578740 07/28/00 1884 1020 578740 07/28/00 1884 1020 578740 07/28/00 1884 1020 578740 07/28/00 1884 1020 578740 07/28/00 1884 9J.~ERTSONS-NORRTERN DIVI 5806349 AL~ERTSONS-NOPJ4TERN DIVIli06342 ALBERTSONS-NORHTERN DIVI 1106342 ALBERTSONS-NORH'I~ DIVI 5806349 A~ERTSONS-NORHTERN DIVI 5806449 ALBERTSONS-NORHTERNDIVI 5806349 ;~BERTSONS-NOR~RN DIVI 5806349 ALBERTSONS-NOP,}{TERN DIVI 5806349 AI~ERTSONS-NORHTERN DIVI 5806349 ALBERTSONS-NOP~RN DIVI S806349 ALBERTSONS-NOR/~ DIVI 5806349 A/~BERTSONS-NORHT'ERNDIVI 5806349 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 0.00 20.86 0.00 34.11 0.00 19.87 0.00 14.34 0,00 53.87 0.00 173.07 0.00 87.53 0.00 12.03 0.00 104.97 0.00 6.68 0.00 53.87 0.00 ~ 9 RUN DATE 07/27/00 TIME 16:55:18 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 07/27/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND '---CTION CRITERIA: ~ransact.trans_date between "07/24/2000" and "07/28/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 578740 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578741 1020 578742 1020 578743 1020 578744 1020 578744 1020 578744 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578745 1020 578746 1020 578746 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578747 1020 578747 '~ 578747 L CHECK 1020 578748 1020 578748 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578749 1020 578750 1020 578750 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578751 1020 578752 1020 578753 1020 578754 1020 578755 1020 578756 1020 578757 1020 578758 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 07/28/00 1884 ALBERTSONS-NORHTERN DIVI 1106342 05/28/00 1611 07/28/00 44 07/28/00 1533 07/28/00 52 O7/28/0O 52 O7/28/00 52 ALOTTA'S DELI CATERING 5506549 AMERICAN RED CROSS 5806449 AN ARRAY OF FLOWERS 5606620 AON RISK SERVICES INC 1104540 AON RISK SERVICES INC 1104540 AON RISK SERVICES INC 1104540 07/28/00 57 ARAMARK 1104510 07/28/00 1903 ARCHCO 6104800 07/28/00 1903 ANCHCO 6104800 07/28/00 61 07/28/00 61 07/28/00 61 ARTISTIC PLANT CREATIONS 1108503 ARTISTIC PLANT CREATIONS 1108504 ARTISTIC PLANT CREATIONS 1108501 07/28/00 71 07/28/00 71 B & R ICE CREAM DIST 5606620 B & R ICE CREAM DIST 5606620 07/28/00 M~O01 o7/28/0o 1280 07/28/00 1250 BAAMA 6104800 THE BALLOON FAMILY 5606620 TH~ BALLOON FAMILY 5606620' 07/28/00 1557 07/28/00 1592 07/28/00 1475 07/28/00 114 07/28/00 1980 07/28/00 M2001 07/28/00 1145 07/28/00 1777 DAVID BARNES 5806349 BIDDi4~ ROOFING SUPPLY IN 1108312 BILL'S TREE CARE AND LAN 1108314 BUBBLE MACHINE CAR WASH 6308540 BU~L INDUSTRIES INC 1106265 CALIFORRIA DEFT OF TRANS 1108601 CALIFORNIA SURVEYING & D 1108101 LORI CARR 5606620 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SUPPLIES LUNCH MEETING SUPPLIES SUPPLIES RENEWAL RLI INSURANCE EMPLOYEE COFFEE P~t~IDALL C}~LTN 7/3-7/9 RANDALL Ch-ON 7/10-7/16 PLANT CARE 7/00 PLART CARE 7/00 PLANT CALVE 7/00 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CORPORATE MEMBERSHIP SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CATERIN~ PROGRAM SUPPLIES TIME & MATERIAL CAR WASH 6/OO SUPPLIES PUBLICATION SUPPLIES P~RFORMER PO 51057 SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0o00 0.00 0.00 0.00 85.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.52 695.19 157.50 15.00 90.02 10000.00 40000.00 49650.00 99650.00 87.70 2720.00 3400.00 6120.00 65.00 81.00 214.00 360.00 777.63 912.10 1689.73 125.00 108.25 238.15 346.40 112.00 1117.14 2250.00 117.00 92.40 16.00 30.15 135.00 RUN DATE 07/27/00 TIME 16:55:19 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 07/27/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 3 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transacu.trans_da~e between "07/24/2000" and "07/28/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 578759 07/28/00 1460 1020 578760 07/28/00 144 1020 578761 07/28/00 1820 1020 578762 07/28/00 157 1020 578763 07/28/00 911 1020 578764 07/28/00 M2001 1020 578765 07/28/00 1128 1020 578766 07/28/00 1974 1020 578767 07/28/00 173 1020 578768 07/28/00 1656 1020 578768 07/28/00 1656 1020 578768 07/28/00 1656 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578769 07/28/00 183 1020 578770 07/28/00 184 1020 578771 07/28/00 1973 1020 578772 07/28/00 1964 1020 578773 07/28/00 198 1020 578774 07/28/00 209 1020 578774 07/28/00 209 1020 578774 07/28/00 209 1020 578774 07/28/00 209 1020 578774 07/28/00 209 TOTA~L CHECK 1020 578775 07/28/00 213 1020 578776 07/28/00 1958 1020 578776 07/28/00 1958 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578777 07/28/00 222 1020 578778 07/28/00 1376 1020 578779 07/28/00 233 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT TONI CARREIRO 6104800 CASH 5606620 CERIDIAN BE1TEFITS SERVIC 110 JASON H CHAN 5806249 RAYMOND CHONG 1108601 CHUN, RANDALL 6104800 PEGGY CLARK 5806249 CLEVENGER P, F2%LTY APPRAIS 4209217 COCA-COLA BOTTLING OF CA 5606620 COGNOS CORPORATION 1104510 COGNOS CORPORATION 1104100 COGNOS CORPORATION 1104200 COTTON SHIRES & ASSO IN 110 JAMES,COURTNEY 5606620 THE CUPERTINO HISTORICAL 1101004 CUPERTINO TOWN CE1TI~R LL 1101500 CUPERTINO UNION SC~IL DIS 5208003 DE ANZA SERVICES INC DE ANZA SERVICES INC DE ANZA SERVICES INC DE ANZA SERVICES INC DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108501 5708510 5708510 1108501 1108511 DEPT OF GENERAL SERVICES 6308540 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY 6309820 DISPENSING TECHNOLOGY 6309820 DKS ASSOCIATES DUDLEY ACOUSTICS INC ECONOMIC DRIVING SCHOOL 110860k 1108501 5806249 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT WEBSITE UPDATES 0.00 2657.50 CASH ADVANCE/PURCHASE 0.00 250.00 ADMIN FEES 6/00 0.00 32.80 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 87.50 REIMBURSEMF2Tr 0.00 607.00 REIMBURS]~4ENT 0.00 64.94 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 1540.00 APPRAISAL SERVICES 0.00 500.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 218.40 M JIMENEZ 0.00 960.00 J CHANG & S MACGOWAN 0.00 1920.00 J OF~I 0.00 960.00 0,00 3840.00 R#8191 0.00 ~ 0 PERFORMER PO 51050 0.00 680.00 FY 2000/01 DONATION 0.00 40000.00 RF2~T 8/00 0.00 3884.00 TRANSPORTATION 0.00 520.46 SPECIAL SVC 6/00 0.00 840.00 SPECIAL SVCS 6/00 0.00 75.00 JANITORIAL SVCS 6/00 0.00 359.57 SPECIAL SVCS 6/00 0.00 225.00 SPECIAL SVCS 7/00 0.00 125.00 0.00 1624.57 SERVICE REVOLVING FUND 0.00 964.01 CHISEL SCALER 93.53 1383.53 HONDA LINE REMOVER 9HP 322.63 4772.63 416.16 6156.16 CONSULTING SVCS 6/2/00 0.00 878.60 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 48.71 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 2? 9 RUN DATE 07/27/00 TIME 16:55:20 - FINANCIAL ACCOU~'TING 07/27/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING P£RIOD: 1/01 CHECK REG/STER - DISBURSEMENT FL~TD ~ 'TION CRITERIA: ~ransacc.crans_date between "07/24/2000" and "07/28/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASN ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE 4 AMOUNT 1020 578780 1020 578781 1020 578781 TOTAL CHECK 07/28/00 251 EVANS NEST VALLEY SPRAY 1108315 0~/28/00 253 EXCHANGE LINEN SERVICE 5606620 07/28/00 253 EXCHANGE LINEN SERVICE 5606620 1020 578782 07/28/00 265 1020 578783 07/28/00 1778 1020 578784 07/28/00 1827 1020 578785 07/28/00 296 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 578786 07/28/00 310 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/90 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 1020 578786 07/28/00 310 10~. 578786 07/28/00 310 CHECK FLAIR-T CONSTRUCTION 4209108 LEE FRANCIA 5606620 GEORGE'S P. ADIATOR & SERV 6308840 KAREN GOTTLEIB 5806449 GTE WIRELESS 5208003 GTE WIRELESS 1108501 GTE WIRELESS 5806449 GT~ WIRELESS 5806449 ~ WIRELESS 1108706 GTE WIRELESS 5806349 GTE WIRELESS 1107503 GTE WIRELESS 1107503 GTE WIRELESS 6104800 GTE WIRELESS 1108503 GTE WIRELESS 1108501 GTE WIRELESS 1108504 GTE WIRELESS 1108504 GTE WIRELESS 1108504 G'I'E WIRELESS 1107503 GTE WIRELESS 1108503 ~ WIRELESS 1108504 GTE WIRELESS 1108602 GTE WIRELESS 1108101 GTE WIRELESS 5806349 GTE WIRELESS 1107503 GTE WIRELESS 1108602 ~ WIP. ELESS 1108201 GTE WIRELESS 1108201 GT~ WIRELESS 6104800 GTE WIRELESS 1107501 GTE WIRELESS 1107501 GTE WIRELESS 1108201 GTE WIRELESS 1107503 GTE WIRELESS 1107503 GTE WIRELESS 1108505 GTE WIRELESS .1107503 G~ WIRELESS 1108102 GTE WIRELESS 1107503 ~ WIRELESS 1108102 TURF SPRAYING SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TIME & MATERIAL 0.00 PERFORMER PO 51058 0.00 LABOR 0.00 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELL~ PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4200.00 264.36 78.11 342.47 2385.25 720. O0 62.50 1152.00 40.62 105.75 140.30 211.42 30.93 182.44 110.82 73.62 98.64 62.89 24.42 278.35 170.77 118.72 92.68 135.20 159.49 59.21 183.56 135.70 110.82 48.52 130.01 66.68 128.66 56.98 121.56 221.51 56.34 55.98 72.80 194.84 502.47 198.42 86.32 4458.66 RUN DATE 07/27/00 TIME 16:55:20 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 07/27/00 CI"/'Y OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.crans_date between "07/24/2000" and "07/28/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT 1020 578787 07/28/00 315 JILL HAFF 5806449 1020 578788 07/28/00 320 KATHI HARKNESS 5806449 1020 578789 07/28/00 M2001 HDL COREN & CONE 1104000 1020 578790 07/28/00 328 LAT.1REN HENSHALL 5806449 1020 578791 07/28/00 1410 HILLYARD 5606620 1020 578792 07/28/00 334 HOME DEPOT/GECP 6308540 1020 578792 07/28/00 334 HOME DEPOT/GECF 5708510 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578793 07/28/00 1951 HOMESTEAD F.F.C. INC 5806449 1020 578794 07/28/00 1898 HORIZON 2709309 1020 578795 07/28/00 857 SANDRAJAMES 1101000 1020 578796 07/28/00 1969 GAIL JENSEN 2204011 1020 578797 07/28/00 1977 JOE'S TRACTOR SERVICE 1108302 1020 578798 07/28/00 1960 1020 578799 07/28/00 1657 ' 1020 578799 07/28/00 1657 1020 578799 07/28/00 1657 1020 578799 07/28/00 1657 1020 578799 07/28/00 1657 1020 578799 07/28/00 1657 1020 578799 07/28/00 1657 1020 578799 07/28/00 1657 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578800 1020 578801 1020 578802 1020 578803 1020 578803 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578804 1020 578805 JOI4N J HOLLWEDEL & ASSOC 4209217 JOSEPHINE'S PERSONNEL SE 1106500 JOSEPHINE'S PERSONNEL SE 1106448 JOSEPHINE'S PERSONNEL SE 1106500 JOSEPHINE'S PERSONNEL SE 1106265 JOSEPHINE'S PERSONNEL SE 1106500 JOSEPHINE'S PERSONNEL SE 1106500 JOSEPHINE'S PERSONNEL SE 1106265 JOSEPHINE'S PERSONNEL SE 1106265 07/28/00 1437 THE JUNGLE 5806349 07/28/00 363 JUST PLAY SPORTS ACADEMY 5806449 07/28/00 1216 KALEIDOSCOPE 1106647 07/28/00 1972 KIMBALL-MIDWEST 6308540 07/28/00 1972 KIMBALL-MIDWEST 6308840 07/28/00 372 07/28/00 376 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX RUN DATE 07/27/00 TIM~ 16:55:21 PAGE 5 AMOUNT RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 287.50 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 576.00 STATISTICAL SEC PKG 0.00 100.00 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 115.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 351.92 SUPPLIES 0.00 42.64 SUPPLIES 0.00 14.12 0.00 56.76 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 760.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 1243.49 REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 29.08 TLT PROGRAM 0.00 375.00 LABOR 0.00 I JO APPRAISAL SERVICE 0.00 400.00 RAFAEL VILLALOBOS 0.00 243.20 RAFAEL VILLALOBOS 0.00 399.00 RAFAEL VILLALOBOS 0.00 243.20 RAFAEL VILLALOBOS 0.00 285.00 RAFAEL VILLALOBOS 0.00 182.40 RAFAEL VILLALOBOS 0.00 304.00 RAFAEL VILLALOBOS 0.00 125.%0 RAFAEL VILLALOBOS 0.00 304.00 0.00 2086.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING ADMISSION RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES KINKO'S INC 1106448 COLOR COPIES I(NORR SYSTEMS INC 5606620 SUPPLIES 72.26 7108.25 108.89 43.78 33.26 77.04 6.57 651.20 07/27/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 C~CK REGISTER - DISBLTRSE~ FUND CTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/24/2000" and "07/28/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 578806 1020 578807 1020 578808 1020 578808 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578809 1020 578810 1020 578811 1020 578812 1020 578813 1020 578813 1020 578813 1020 578813 1020 578813 TOTAL CHECK 578814 1020 578815 1020 578816 1020 578817 1020 578817 1020 578817 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578818 1020 578819 1020 578820 1020 578820 1020 578820 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578821 1020 578822 1020 578823 1020 578823 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT 07/28/00 377 07/28/00 1226 07/28/00 1393 07/28/00 1393 PETER KOEHLER 5806249 LANDS' END CORPORATE SAL 1101000 THE LEONARD GROUP INC 1101000 THE LEONARD GROUP INC 5506549 07/28/00 1347 07/28/00 400 07/28/00 404 07/28/00 1263 07/28/00 408 07/28/O0 408 07/28/00 408 07/28/00 408 07/28/00 408 HELEN LEPLEY 5606620 LIFETIME TENNIS INC 5706450 LONGS DRUG STORES #260 5806349 AL LOPEZ 5606620 LOS GATOS MEAT & SMOKEHO 5606620 LOS GATOS MEAT & SMOKEHO 5606620 LOS GATOS MEAT & SMOREHO 5606620 LOS GATOS MEAT & SMOKEHO 5606620 LOS GATOS MEAT & SMOKEHO 5606620 07/28/00 1463 07/28/00 D't?.O01 07/28/00 431 07/28/00 437 07/28/00 437 07/28/00 437 MAACO AUTO PAINTING & BO 6308840 MACWORLD 5506549 MC WHORTER'S OFFICE PROD 1104000 METRO NEWSPAPERS 1104300 METRO NEWSPAPERS 1104300 METRO NEWSPAPERS 1104300 07/28/00 439 07/28/00 443 07/28/00 447 07/28/00 447 07/28/00 447 MIC~4AELS #13333 5806349 MIT.?.k~'NIUM MECHANICAL IN 1108502 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE 1108201 07/28/00 455 07/28/00 463 07/28/00 479 07/28/00 479 HEATH~RMOLL 5806249 VICTOR G MOSSOTTI 5806449 NATURES WOOD 5606620 MATU~ES WOOD 5606620 ..... DESCHI PTION ...... SALES TAX RECREATION PROGRAM CITY LOGO SHIRT WALL CLOCK/50% DEPOSIT SUPPLIES PERFORMER PO 51053 PROF SVCS PO 29587 SUPPLIES PERFORMER PO 51228 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REPAIR & PAINT SUBSCRIPTION SUPPLIES PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE SUPPLIES TIME & MATERIAL UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICE HECR~ATION PROGRAM RECREATION PROG~UU4 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.16 34.24 59.40 3-'1'8 I~40UIPT 845.00 27.40 111.00 210.56 321.56 135.00 42752.80 73.98 200.00 256.85 2073.42 2000.81 1186.64 271.88 5789.60 375.78 19.97 16.62 S5.00 SO.O0 57.50 162.S0 16.22 839.84 84.32 84.32 ~4.32 252.96 888.00 230.00 330.16 449.24 779.40 RUN DATE 07/27/00 TIME 16:55:22 - FINANCIAL ~1q~3 07/27/00 CI~'Y OF C'u'PERTINO PAGE 7 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 C~CK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT lCTIND SELECTION CRITERIA: ~ransac~.trans_da~e between "07/24/2000" and "07/28/2000" FUND - 110 - GENER~ FUND C3%SH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 578824 1020 578825 1020 578826 1020 578827 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 07/28/00 1341 07/28/00 1550 07/28/00 1358 07/28/00 M2001 ROBERTA NAVARRO 5606620 ADONIS L NECESITO 1103500 NORTHEP, N TOOL & EQUIPMEN 1108830 NORTON, ERIC 110 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... S;%T.~S TAX ;U~OUNT PERFORMER PO 51055 0.00 225.00 PROP SVCS 0.00 355.00 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 309.23 RI~FUND/~NC BOND R7406 0.00 5500.00 1020 578828 07/28/00 1970 I~ARA NL~S 2204011 TLT PROGRAM 0.00 375.00 1020 578829 1020 578830 07/28/00 499 D~BBIE O'NEILL 07/28/00 493 OFFICE DEPOT 5606620 1107301 PERFOP,~R PO 51059 0.00 1170.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 43.05 1020 578831 1020 578832 07/28/00 495 OFFICE HELPER 07/28/00 1190 RONALD OLDS 1104300 1103500 SUPPLIES 0.00 192.93 PROP SVCS 0.00 50.00 1020 578833 1020 578833 1020 578833 1020 578833 1020 578833 1020 578833 1020 578833 1020 578833 1020 578833 1020 578833 1020 578833 1020 578833 1020 578833 1020 578833 1020 578833 TOTAL CHECK 07/28/00 1220 07/28/00 1220 07/28/00 1220 07/28/00 1220 07/28/00 1220 07/28/00 1220 07/28/00 1220 07/28/00 1220 07/28/00 1220 07/28/00 1220 07/28/00 1220 07/28/00 1220 07/28/00 1220 07/28/00 1220 07/28/00 1220 ORC~L%RD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY }~%RDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCI-IARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAR~ ORCHARd. SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAR~ ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWg~RE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAR~ ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWARE ORCHARD SUPPLY HARDWAR]~ 4209216 1108315 5708510 1108312 1108501 1108530 1108508 1108504 1108530 1107405 1108530 1108501 1108508 1108501 1108501 SUPPLIES 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 SITPPLIES 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.~0 SUPPLIES 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 23.78 109.81 176.23 53.91 4 2 19.43 26.54 40.21 77.14 55.16 73.63 8.37 73.97 24.63 1232.51 1020 578834 07/28/00 505 ORLANDI TRAILER 6308840 SUPPLIES 0.00 6.50 1020 578835 1020 578835 1020 578835 1020 578835 1020 578835 TOTAL CHECK 07/28/00 507 DAN OSBORNE 07/28/00 507 DAN OSBORNE 07/28/00 507 DAN OSBORlqE 07/28/00 507 DAN OSBORITR 09/28/00 507 DAN OSBOP. NE 1108407 1108602 1108602 1108602 1108303 TIME & MA~I~RIAL 0.00 510.00 PO 30378 0.00 604.99 PO 51295 0.00 1400.00 PO 30378 0.00 467.59 TIME & MATI~RIAL 0.00 1600.00 0.00 4582.58 1020 578836 07/28/00 1909 CAROLYN P/~IN 5606620 PERFORI~R PO 51229 0.00 180.00 1020 578837 1020 578837 1020 578837 1020 578837 TOTAL CHECK 07/28/00 1952 PAPA 07/28/00 1952 PAPA 07/28/00 1952 PAPA 07/28/00 1952 PAPA 1108407 1108407 1108407 1108407 DIANE MAIiAN 0.00 10.00 TONY PRONI 0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 KANE WOLFE 0.00 10.00 0.00 RUN DATE 07/27/00 TIME 16:55:22 - FINANCIAl, ACCOUNTING 07/27/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 C~ECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND ~CTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/24/2000" and "07/28/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASM ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX PAGE 8 ~MOUNT 1020 578838 1020 578839 1020 578839 TOTA/, CHECK 1020 578840 1020 578841 1020 578841 1020 578841 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578842 1020 578843 1020 578844 1020 578845 578846 578846 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578847 1020 578847 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578848 1020 578849 1020 578849 1020 578849 TOTAL C~ECK 1020 578850 1020 578851 1020 578851 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578852 1020 578857 1020 578857 1020 578857 1020 578857 1020 578857 578857 07/28/00 526 PENINSULA BLUEPRINT 4209430 09/28/00 531 PEPSI-COLA COMPA~TY 5806249 07/28/00 531 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 5806349 07/28/00 M2001 07/28/00 542 07/28/00 542 07/28/00 542 07/28/00 545 07/28/00 1911 07/28/00 1976 07/28/00 sTo 07/28/00 1071 07/28/00 1071 O7/28/O0 84S 07/28/00 845 07/28/00 59O 07/28/00 M2001 07/28/00 M2001 07/28/00 M2001 07/28/00 605 07/28/00 345 07/28/00 345 07/28/00 959 07/28/00 625 07/28/00 625 07/28/00 625 07/28/00 625 07/28/00 625 07/28/00 625 PERFORMANCE TRAINING ASS 1108201 PINE CONE LUMBER 4209216 PINE CONE LUMBER 4209216 PINE CONE LUMBER 4209216 JEFF PISERCHIO 5606640 PLAYSA~ LLC 4209108 PULONE & STRO~BERG 1104300 RADIO SHACK 5806249 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 1108530 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC 1108530 KEI~ RET~R 1108511 KEI~ REaR 1108530 RICH VOSS TRUCKING INC 4209216 RIVERS, BERT F 1100000 RIV~, BERT F 1100000 RIVERS, BERT F 1100000 RUSS E~rI'~KPRISES INC SAN FRANCISCO ELEVATOR SAN FRANCISCO ELEVATOR 2708405 1108502 1108501 SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS SAN JOSE WATP~R COMPANY SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY SAN JOSEWAT~R CONPANY SAN JOSE WAT~ COMPANY SAN JOSS WATER C(IMPANY 1104000 1108407 1108314 1108312 1108407 1108407 1108407 BLUELINE PRINTS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES FP, A/qK MOYANO SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PROF SVCS EQUIPMENT INSPECTION T~ANSC~IPT SUPPLIES LABOR & MATERIAL LA~OR & MATERIAL EXTERIOR TREATMENT BIRD SPIKES TRUCKING UTILITY TAX REFUND UTILITY TAX REFUND UTILITY TAX REFUND SUPPLIES ELEVATOR SVCS 7/00 ELEVATOR SVCS 7/00 SUBSCRIPTION D-1164945 WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.94 326.20 109.20 435.40 395.00 147.07 95.26 3.32 245.65 1790.00 15730.00 216,.15 35.68 5391.00 4770.00 10161.00 250.00 306.80 556.80 124.00 21.60 16.24 128.27 166.11 234.90 47.24 140.01 187.25 44.01 136.S0 13.17 1770.27 36.78 31.91 30.50 RUN DATE 07/27/00 TINE 16:55:23 - FINANCIAL ACCOtH~TING 07/27/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 9 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEt~ FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.~ran$_date beuween "07/24/2000" and "07/28/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASM ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108312 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108312 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAI~ S606620 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 5708510 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAI~Pf 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAI~ 1108315 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~TY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108315 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108506 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JO~E WATER COMPANY 1108315 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108504 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606640 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAI%TY 1108303 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5606620 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108504 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPAI~Y 1108504 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108408 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COf4PANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5708510 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WA~"ER COMPA~ 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108321 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WA%~ER COMPA~'Y 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108312 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~TY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER C(~A~ 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER CO~PA~ 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER C09~ANY 1108407 ..... DESCRIPTION WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVIC~ WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE WATER SERVICE SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMOUNT 3635.39 98.19 327.87 172.21 $3.77 1462.10 1022.20 299.50 1037.51 49.00 234.72 148.81 168.52 99.82 2619.81 26.58 30.42 187.91 526.26 12.50 1534.45 1858.63 %2 ,1 67.43 2279.92 217.72 9.00 850.86 30.42 157.00 15.65 39.26 2499.43 168.71 33.72 82.80 103.93 25.00 94.73 399.69 16.73 30.42 95.67 851.60 178.38 315.00 26.58 8.61 19.88 ~8 RUN DATE 07/27/00 TIME 16:55:24 - FINANCIAL ACCOD~ITING 07/27/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 C~CK ~,EGISTER - DISBURSE~ FUND '~CTION CRITERIA: transact.frans_date between "07/24/2000" and "07/28/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA/qY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA/qY 1108314 1020 578857 0~/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 5708510 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SA/q JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108506 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108302 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108507 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108314 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA/qY 5606620 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPA~ 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 ~ .... ~ 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 4209110 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108503 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108303 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 SA~ JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 1020 578857 07/28/00 625 ~ JOSE WATER COMPANY 1108407 TOTAL C}{ECK 1020 578858 07/28/00 628 1020 578859 07/28/00 633 1020 578860 07/28/00 1360 1020 578861 07/28/00 639 1020 578862 07/28/00 ~749 1020 578862 07/28/00 1749 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578863 07/28/00 647 1020 578864 07/28~00 1864 1020 578865 07/28/00 652 1020 578866 07/28/00 658 578866 07/26/00 658 SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERI 1102100 SANTA CLARA COUNTY S~RI 5606620 SANTA CLARA UNIFIED SCHO 5806349 SAVIN CORPORATION 1104310 SHANNON ASSOCIATES 1104510 SHANNON ASSOCIATES 1104510 ELIZABETH SHANNON 5806449 SIDESADDL~ AND CO 1106248 SIERRA SPRING WATER COMP 1106265 SILV~/~ADO SPRINGS BO'I'I'LE 1104510 SILV~ADO SPRINGS BOTTLE 1104510 WATER SERVICE 0.00 32.22 WATER SERVICE 0.00 13.91 WATER SERVICE 0.00 9.00 WATER SERVICE 0.00 70.13 WATER SERVICE 0.00 9.00 WATER SERVICE 0.00 629.26 WATER SERVICE 0.00 12.50 WATER SERVICE 0.00 112.19 WATER SERVICE 0.00 33.64 WATER SERVICE 0.00 8.61 WATER SERVICE 0.00 58.98 WATER SERVICE 0.00 882.30 WATER SERVICE 0.00 546.17 WATER SERVICE 0.00 57.45 WATER SERVICE 0.00 1141.92 WATER SERVICE 0.00 1310.93 WATER SERVICE 0.00 141.95 WATER SERVICE 0.00 174.35 WATER SERVICE 0.00 156.04 WATER SERVICE 0.00 85.56 WATER SERVICE 0.00 72.94 WATER SERVICE 0.00 30.50 WATER SERVICE 0.00 141.16 WATER SERVICE 0.00 110.97 WATER SERVICE 0.00 1636.08 WATER SERVICE 0.00 115.00 WATER SERVICE 0.00 151.62 WATER SERVICE 0.00 27.99 WATER SERVICE 0.00 482.35 0.00 36285.47 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 0.00 SECURITY 0.00 TRANSPORTATION 0.00 COPY PLAN AGREEMENT 0.00 PROF SVCS 6/00 0.00 PROF SVCS 6/00 0.00 0.00 427099.50 1829.70 553.00 4306.36 1842.46 9572.02 11414.48 P~EC~F, ATION PROGRAM 0.00 345.00 PERFORMER 0.00 650.00 WATF, R SVC 5/31-6/28/00 0.00 194.90 ~:q_~OYEE WATER 0.00 60.50 · MPLOYEE WATER 0.00 178.00 RUN DATE 07/27/00 TIME 16:55:25 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 07/27/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 11 ACCOLI~ING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSF~ FUtTD SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/24/2000" and "07/28/2000# FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 578866 TOT;LL CHECK 1020 578867 1020 578868 1020 578869 1020 578869 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578870 1020 578871 1020 578872 1020 578872 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578873 1020 578873 1020 578873 1020 578873 1020 578873 1020 578873 TOTAL C~ECK 1020 578874 1020 578875 1020 578876 1020 578877 1020 578877 TOTAL C~ECK 1020 578878 1020 578879 1020 578880 1020 578881 1020 578881 1020 578881 1020 578881 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578882 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 07/28/00 658 SILVERADO SPRINGS BOTTLE 1104510 07/28/00 659 07/28/00 1975 07/28/00 1954 07/28/00 1954 S~WKS SPORTS ACADEMY 5806449 SOUZA & LERSCHEN 1104511 SPHERION CORPORATION 1104300 SPHERION CORPORATION 1104300 07/28/00 684 07/28/00 686 07/28/00 1883 07/28/00 1883 C~RYL STODD~RD 5806449 DARRYL STOW 2204010 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC 6109850 SUNGA,RD PENTAMATION INC 6109850 07/28/00 695 07/28/00 695 07/28/00 695 07/28/00 695 07/28/00 695 07/28/00 695 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5806349 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5806249 SYSCO FOOD SERVICES OF S 5606620 07/28/00 1763 THEATERFUN INC 5806349 07/28/00 708 NANCY THOMPSON 5806449 07/28/00 710 ~ TOOMBS 5806249 07/28/00 712 TRACTOR EQUIP~ CO 6308840 07/28/00 712 TRACTOR EQUIPM~ CO 6308840 07/28/00 724 ~3RF & INDUSTRIAL EQUIPM 5606640 07/28/00 738 V~,?,Ry OIL CC~4PANY 6308840 07/28/00 1959 VAST 6308540 07/28/00 749 VISA 5806349 07/28/00 749 VISA 1106300 07/28/00 749 VISA 5806349 07/28/00 749 VISA 1106448 07/28/00 1342 VESTA WALDEN S606620 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... EMPLOYEE WATER RECREATION PROGRAM NEMETZ CASE SANDRA BERNARD SANDRA BERNARD RECREATION PROGRAM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DATA LINE CHARGES 6/00 P&R INTERFACE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CREDIT 7/13/00 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CREDIT 7/13/00 PO 51291/P&R PROGRAM RECREATION PROGRAM RECREATION PROGRAM PARTS PARTS SERVICE GOLF CART GASOLINE TIME & MATERIAL SUPPLIES REGISTRATION SUPPLIES LUNC~ PERFOP44~R PO 51054 SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.48 63.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 72.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00 AMOUNT 93.50 332.00 7286.00 337.60 390.00 624.00 1014.00 287.50 750.00 142.82 1500.00 1642.82 2552.08 4988.94 -39,75 ? ~3 3 -110,64 7818,19 300.00 230.00 4756.40 7.79 826.16 833.95 140.00 4372.90 1135.37 966.08 145.00 281.66 78.16 1470.90 1BO.O0 3 - RUN DATE 07/27/00 TIME 16:55:25 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTI~ 07/27/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 12 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 1/01 CHECK R~GISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND '~CTION CRITERIA: ~ransact.trans_date between "07/24/2000" and "07/28/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEFT 1020 578883 07/28/00 757 JOYCE WATERMAN 5606620 1020 578884 07/28/00 761 WEDEM~YER BAKERY 5606620 1020 578884 0%/28/00 761 WEDEMEYER BAKERY 5606620 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578885 07/28/00 775 WESTERN PACIFIC SIGNAL L 1108602 1020 578886 07/28/00 1517 WILDLIFE CENTER OF SILIC 5806349 1020 578887 07/28/00 805 ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROU 2709440 1020 578887 07/28/00 805 ~T3MWALT ENGINEERING GROU 2709437 1020 578887 07/28/00 805 ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROU 4209529 1020 578887 07/28/00 805 ~UMWALT ENGINEERING GROU 2709412 1020 578887 07/28/00 805 ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROU 2709413 1020 578887 07/28/00 805 ZT3MWALT ENGINEERING GROU 2709531 1020 578887 07/28/00 805 ZT.~4WALT ENGINEERING GROU 4209527 1020 578887 07/28/00 805 ZUMWALT ENGINEERING GROU 4209530 1020 578887 07/28/00 805 ZLD4WALT ENGINEERING GROU 2709443 1020 578887 07/28/00 805 ZT3MWALT ENGINEERING GROU 2709436 1020 578887 07/28/00 805 ZL~MWALT ENGINEERING GROU 2709438 TOTAL CHECK L CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... PERFORMER PO 51060 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES DONATION PROF SVCS 6/00 PROF SVCS 6/00 PROF SVCS 6/00 PROF SVCS 6/00 PROF SVCS 6/00 PROF SVCS 6/00 PROF SVCS 6/00 PROF SVCS 6/00 PROF SVCS 6/00 PROF SVCS 6/00 PROF SVCS 6/00 SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 634.23 634.23 634.23 AMOUNT 135.00 413.00 653.44 1066.44 905.65 25.00 51.00 495.50 153.00 612.00 1002.00 2295.1S 540.54 372.00 606.00 1053.00 2205.50 9585.69 856416.30 856416.30 856416.30 RUN DATE 07/27/00 TIME 16:55:26 - FINANCIAL ACCCR]~TZNG RESOLUTION NO. 00-226 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PER/OD ENDING AUGUST 04, 2000 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and fi.om the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: Direct6r of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st day of August. ,2000, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cup~dno 08/07/00 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/01 CITY OF CUPERTINO CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/31/2000" and "08/04/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 578888 08/01/00 146 CASH 5806349 1020 578888 08/01/00 146 CASH 580 1020 578888 08/01/00 146 CASH 5806349 1020 578888 08/01/00 146 CASH 5806249 1020 578888 08/01/00 146 CASH 1106342 1020 578888 08/01/00 146 CASH 1106248 1020 578888 08/01/00 146 CASH 1106647 TOTAL CR~CK 1020 578889 08/04/00 1503 A TO Z TREE NURSERY 1108321 1020 578890 08/04/00 7 ;%BAG PLAN CORPORATION 1104540 1020 578890 08/04/00 7 ABAG PLAIq CORPORATION 6204550 TOTAJ~ CHECK 1020 578891 08/04/00 10 ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL 1108314 1020 578891 08/04/00 10 ASAG POWER-ELECTRICAL 1108602 1020 578891 08/04/00 10 ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL 1108602 1020 578891 08/04/00 10 ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL 1108530 1020 578891 08/04/00 10 ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL 1108303 1020 578891 08/04/00 10 ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL 1108511 1020 578891 08/04/00 10 ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL 110 1020 578891 08/04/00 10 ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL 1108504 1020 578891 08/04/00 10 ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL 1108507 1020 578891 08/04/00 10 ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL 1108312 1020 578891 08/04/00 10 ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL 1108407 1020 578891 08/04/00 10 ABAG POWER-ELECTRICAL 1108315 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578892 08/04/00 28 AIRC,~ 2708405 1020 578893 08/04/00 1965 ALL BAY ELECTRIC 1108830 1020 578894 08/04/00 36 ALLEN'S PRESS CLIPPING 1103300 1020 578895 08/04/00 M2001 1020 578896 08/04/00 M2001 ALLIANCE FOR ~ITY M 1101031 ALLIANCE FOR cO~9~rGNITY M 1103500 1020 578897 08/04/00 45 AMERICAN TRAFFIC SUPPLY 2708405 1020 578898 08/04/00 1515 APPRAISAL RESEARCH CORPO 4209430 1020 578899 08/04/00 57 ~ 1104510 1020 578900 08/04/00 1057 BENEFITAMERICA 110 1020 578900 08/04/00 1057 BENEFITA~ICA 110 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578901 08/04/00 M BERRY, MIKE 1106343 ..... DESCRIPTION PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME PETTY ~M REI~SE~ PE~ ~H REI~SE~ PE~ ~H REI~SE~ PE~ ~H REI~SE~ PE~ ~H REI~SE~ SUPPLIES AVELAR CLAIM WC AD~ FEE 7/0O ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC LEVELIZED PMT DEPOSIT ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC ELECTRIC SUPPLIES EMERGENCY REPAIR PRESS CLIPPING 7/00 MEMBERSHIP/D KREY ENTRIES/200 WAVE AWARD SUPPLIES PROF SVCS EMPLOYEE COFFEE *FLEX HLTH *FLEX DEP REIMBURSEMENT/BBQ SVCS SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE AMOUNT 53.37 200.00 27.00 15.20 29.17 31.38 29.39 385.51 138.73 4634.23 827.26 5461.49 266.13 2461.69 56.84 20572.79 18.52 442.75 64976.00 5~' 92 55.01 978.77 222.71 95841.57 63.48 7198.20 36.00 305.00 S0.00 23.76 1250.00 259.61 118.6~ 769.24 887.8~ 5324.1~ RUN DATE 08/07/00 TIME 11:26:33 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 08/07/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 2 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBLTRS~MENT ~ ~'CTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/31/2000" and "08/04/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 578902 08/04/00 125 1020 578902 08/04/00 125 1020 578902 08/04/00 125 TOTAL CHECK CALIF STATE COMPUTER STO 6104800 CALIF STATE COMPUTER STO 6104800 CALIF STATE COMPUTER STO 6104800 1020 578903 08/04/00 147 1020 578903 08/04/00 147 1020 578903 08/04/00 147 1020 578903 08/04/00 147 1020 578903 08/04/00 147 1020 578903 08/04/00 147 TOTAL CHECK CASH 5506549 CASH 1106500 CASH 1106500 CASH 5506549 CASH 5506549 CASH 5506549 1020 578904 08/04/00 155 1020 S78904 08/04/00 155 TOTAL CHECK CENTRAL WHOLESALE NURSER 1108303 CENTRAL WHOLESALE NURSER 1108321 1020 578905 08/04/00 1156 CHA 110 1020 S78906 08/04/00 M2001 CITY GUIDES OF SF0 5506549 1020 578907 08/04/00 M2001 578908 08/04/00 178 CITY OF SAN MATEO 1101200 COLONIAL LIFE & ACCIDENT 110 1020 578909 1020 578909 1020 578909 1020 578909 1020 578909 1020 578909 1020 578909 1020 578909 1020 578909 1020 578909 1020 578909 1020 578909 1020 578909 TOTAL CHECK 08/04/00 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108507 08/04/00 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108511 08/04/00 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108501 08/04/00 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108501 08/04/00 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108502 08/04/00 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108503 08/04/00 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108509 08/04/00 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108314 08/04/00 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108407 08/04/00 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108509 08/04/00 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108506 08/04/00 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 1108504 08/04/00 209 DE ANZA SERVICES INC 5708510 1020 578910 1020 578910 TOTAL CHECK 08/04/00 1492 08/04/00 1492 DENCO SALES COMPANY 2708405 DENCO SALES COf~PANY 2708405 1020 578911 08/04/00 223 DON & MINE'S SWEEPING IN 2308004 1020 578912 1020 578913 08/04/00 1982 E.S.R.I. INC 6109853 08/04/00 242 EMPLOYMENT DEVEL DEFT 110 578914 08/04/00 243 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT 110 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... RDRAM AND HP 128MB SDR SUPPLIES SDRAM DIM HP 128MB PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME P~'rl'~ CASH REIMBURSEME PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME SUPPLIES SUPPLIES GUIDED TOUR 8/16/00 LUNCHEON MEETING 8/25 10003328072200 JANITORIAL SVCS 7/00 JANITORIAL SVCS 7/00 JANITORIAL SVCS 7/00 JANITORIAL SVCS 7/00 JANITORIAL SVCS 7/00 JANITORIAL SVCS 7/00 JANITORIAL SVCS 7/00 JANITORIAL SVCS 7/00 JANITORIAL SVCS 7/00 JANITORIAL SVCS 7/00 JANITORIAL SVCS 7/00 JANITORIAL SVCS 7/00 JANITORIAL SVCS 7/00 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES STREET SWEEPING 7/00 ARCVIEW 3.2 UPGRADE SIT SDI SALES TAX 578.48 63.46 49.60 691.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 332.08 0.00 0.00 7590.31 832.66 650.79 9073.76 20.00 8.20 52.80 104.29 26.24 40.00 251.53 50.82 57.97 108.79 135.50 410.00 17.00 66.75 1225.87 1042.18 2139.71 429.14 3754.15 1790.88 636.85 6051.55 900.37 610.96 309.25 5303.77 3211.10 27405.78 481.12 78.86 559.98 10400.80 4357.29 15927.01 693.00 7 RUN DATE 08/07/00 TIME 11:26:34 * FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 08/07/00 CIT~ OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/31/2000" and "08/04/2000" FUND - 110 - GENEP. AL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 578915 1020 578916 1020 578916 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578917 1020 578917 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578918 1020 578919 1020 578920 10~0 578920 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578921 1020 578922 1020 578923 1020 578924 1020 578924 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578925 1020 578925 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578926 1020 578927 1020 578927 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578928 1020 578929 1020 578930 1020 578931 1020 578932 1020 578933 1020 578933 08/04/00 1966 EXACOM INC 6104800 0~/04/00 260 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 1103500 08/04/00 260 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 1107301 0~/04/00 1255 08/04/00 1255 FIRST AUTOMOTIVE DISTRIB 6308840 FIRST AUTOMOTIVE DISTRIB 6308840 08/04/00 1865 ART C~VILN 1106248 08/04/00 1510 CaARCIA WELL & PUMP COMPA 1108502 08/04/00 281 C4%RDERIaAND 1108407 08/04/00 281 C4%RDENLAND 1108407 08/04/00 1827 08/04/00 1942 08/04/00 1413 08/04/00 1235 08/04/00 1235 08/04/00 1951 08/04/00 1951 08/04/00 343 08/04/00 1380 08/04/00 1380 08/04/00 806 08/04/00 1331 08/04/00 372 08/04/00 390 08/04/00 1098 08/04/00 397 08/04/00 397 GEORGE'S RADIATOR & SERV 6308840 GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE 6104800 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICE 1108312 HIG~MARK LIFE INS~CE 110 HIGHMARK LIFE INSURANCE 6414570 HOMESTEAD F.F.C. INC 5806349 HOMESTEAD F.F.C. INC 5806349 ICMA P. ETIREMENT TRUST-45 110 JOBTRAK 1104510 JOBTRA.K 1104510 WENDELL JAMES JOHNSON JR 1108407 JW E~F~RPRISES 1106448 KINKO'S INC 1106448 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 1108406 JEFF LEEDS 1106248 LESLIE'S POOL SUPPLIES I 1108321 LESLIE'S POOL SUPPLIES I 1108303 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX DID-400SF STACKPACK FEDEX 2DAY STANDARD OVERNIGHT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PERFORMER TIME & MATERIAL SUPPLIES SUPPLIES LABOR ICND COURSE/Q ADAMS GP. AFFITI REMOVAL LIFE & AD&D 8/00 LTD 8/00 BOWLING *ICMA MAIL CLERK AD CROSSING GUARD AD BACKFLOW TESTING PORTABLE TOILETS 7/4 COLOR COPIES SUPPLIES PERFORMER SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 3 AMOUNT 3004.17 14.44 17.56 32.00 73.64 170.67 244.31 600.00 703.98 404.98 502.27 907.25 250.00 2095.00 7029.78 4525.60 11555.38 215.00 125.00 340.00 6969.84 54.00 54.00 108.00 50.00 1040.54 33.22 257.68 600.00 353.00 32 RUN DATE 08/07/00 TIME 11:26:34 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 08/07/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 4 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND ~'CTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/31/2000" and "08/04/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX AMOUNT TOTAL CHECK 0.00 707.32 1020 578934 08/04/00 1658 LITTLER MENDELSON P C 1104511 NEMETZ CASE 0.00 2685.70 1020 578935 08/04/00 900 MESITI-MILLER ENGINEERIN 1108501 UNDERGROUND TANK PMT8 0.00 5079.97 1020 578936 08/04/00 1987 MILESTEK INC 1103500 SUPPLIES 0.00 44.50 1020 578937 08/04/00 443 MILLENNIUM MECHANICAL IN 4209216 TIME & MATERIAL O. O0 5993.84 1020 578938 08/04/00 1383 1020 578938 08/04/00 1383 1020 578938 08/04/00 1383 1020 578938 08/04/00.1383 1020 578938 08/04/00 1383 1020 578938 08/04/00 1383 1020 578938 08/04/00 1383 1020 578938 08/04/00 1383 1020 578938 08/04/00 1383 1020 578938 08/04/00 1383 1020 578938 08/04/00 1383 1020 578938 08/04/00 1383 ~--'~ 578938 08/04/00 1383 ~ CHECK MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308840 MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308840 MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308840 MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308840 MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308840 MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308840 MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308840 MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308840 MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308840 MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308840 MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308840 MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308840 MITCHELL BROS AUTO PARTS 6308840 PARTS 4.08 53.50 PARTS 1.60 21.01 PARTS 0.45 5.92 PARTS 1.24 16.23 PARTS 1.24 16.23 PARTS 1.51 19.76 PARTS 0.41 5.38 CREDIT 7/12/00 0.00 -16.23 PARTS 2.71 35.55 PARTS 1.66 21.76 PARTS 1.23 16.10 PARTS 1.23 16.10 CREDIT 7/12/00 0.00 -35.55 17.36 175.76 1020 578939 08/04/00 1023 MASSOUD MODJTEHEDI 1108501 PLA~ REVIEW 0.00 250.00 1020 578940 08/04/00 1989 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIE 1104001 PUBLICATION 0.00 40.00 1020 578941 1020 578941 TOTAL CHECK 08/04/00 495 OFFICE HELPER 1104300 08/04/00 495 OFFICE HELPER 1104300 SUPPLIES 3.58 52.92 SUPPLIES 9.30 137.57 12.88 190.49 1020 578942 08/04/00 501 OPERATING ENGINEERS #3 110 UNION DUES 0.00 457.05 1020 578943 08/04/00 507 DAN OSBORNE 4209216 PROGRESS PAYMENT 0.00 885.00 1020 578944 08/04/00 M2001 OUTREACH 5500000 TRANSPORTATION 0.00 50.00 1020 578945 1020 578945 1020 578945 1020 578945 1020 578945 1020 578945 1020 578945 TOTAL CHECK 08/04/00 833 P E R S 110 08/04/00 833 P E R S 110 08/04/00 833 P E R S 110 08/04/00 833 P E R S 110 08/04/00 833 P E R S 110 08/04/00 833 P E R S 110 08/04/00 833 P E R S 110 *PERS BYBK 0.00 305.65 PERS BUYBK 0.00 67.68 PERS EMPLY 0.00 196.90 PERS EMPLY 0.00 21603.78 PERS SPEC 0.00 351.97 *PEPS BYBK 0.00 394.68 PERS 1959 0.00 74.40 0.00 22995.06 1020 578946 1020 578946 578946 08/04/00 508 08/04/00 508 08/04/00 508 P E R S - HEALTH P E R S - HEALTH P E R S - HEALTH 1104510 1104510 110 HEALTH PREMIUM 8/00 0.00 IIF. J~LTH PP.~MIUM 8/00 0.00 HEALTH PI~MIUM 8/00 0.00 297.78 19864.23 40147.48 RUN DATE 08/07/00 TIME 11:26:35 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 08/07/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 5 ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "07/31/2000" and "08/04/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO TOTAL CHECK ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 578947 08/04/00 526 PENINSULA BLUEPRINT 110 1020 578947 08/04/00 526 PENINSULA BLUEPRINT 110 1020 578947 08/84/00 526 PENINSLTLA BLUEPRINT 110 1020 578947 08/04/00 526 PENINSULA BLUEPRINT 110 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578948 08/04/00 533 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROG 110 1020 578949 08/04/00 542 PINE CONE LUMBER 1108314 1020 578949 08/04/00 542 PIITE CONE LUMBER 1103500 1020 578949 08/04/00 542 PINE CONE LUMBER 1108314 1020 578949 08/04/00 542 PINE CONE LUMBER 1103500 TOTAL CHECK 1050 578950 1020 578951 1020 578951 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578952 1020 578953 1020 578954 1020 578955 1020 578956 1020 578957 1020 578958 1020 578959 1020 578960 1020 578960 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578961 1020 578962 1020 578962 TOTAL CHECK 08/04/00 1247 MARIE PRESTON 1104300 08/04/00 1406 RAINES CHEVORLET 6308840 08/04/00 1406 PAINES C~VORLET 6308840 08/04/00 845 08/O4/O0 M2OOl 08/04/00 610 08/04/00 I',12001 08/04/00 633 08/04/00 646 08/04/00 1864 08/04/00 1985 08/04/00 658 08/04/00 658 08/04/00 1954 08/04/00 891 08/04/00 891 08/04/00 677 08/04/00 690 1020 578963 1020 578964 KEIT~ REUTER 1108314 RODRIGUEZ, ZEKE 5606620 S & S WORLDWIDE 5806349 SAN FI~ANCISCO GIANTS 5506549 SANTA CLARA COUNT~ SHERI 1106448 SECURITY CON~CTOR SVCS 1106448 SIDESADDLE AND CO 1106248 SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOL 1108501 SILVERADO SPRINGS BOTTLE 1104510 SILVERADO SPRINGS BOTTLE 1104510 SPHERION CORPORATION 1104300 JOAN SPITSEN 5506549 JOAN SPITSEN 5506549 STATE STREET BANK & TRUS 110 SUNNYVALE FORD 6308840 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX 0.00 AMOUNT 60309.49 BLUELINE PRINTS R7924 0.00 73.14 BLUELINE PRINTS R8173 0.00 145.49 R8173 0.00 187.54 BLUELINE PRINTS R8185 0.00 220.96 0.00 627.13 PERS LTC 0.00 313.38 SUPPLIES 0.00 95.31 SUPPLIES 0.00 262.19 S%TPPLIES 0.00 100.20 SUPPLIES 0.00 127.99 0.00 585.69 0.00 REIMBURSEMENT CREDIT 7/25/00 PARTS 0.00 8.10 8.10 CLEAN/REPLACE WASP BAI 0.00 REISSUE LOST CK48741 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 PACBELL TOUR 8/16/00 0.00 SECURITY 7/4/00 0.00 FENCE RENTAL 7/4/00 0.00 PERFORMER 0.00 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 EMPLOYEE WATER EMPLOYEE WATER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SANDRA BERNARD TRIP EXPENSES 0.00 0.00 0.00 *PERS DEF 0.00 PARTS 4.67 280.75 -21.65 106.28 84.63 ' - 00 186.26 68.10 203.00 3579..46 1271.88 600.00 68.84 145.00 107.50 252.50 775.13 155.6] 150.0C 305.67 949.7] 2r RUN DATE 08/0?/00 TIME 11:26:36 - FIN]tNCIAL ACCOUNTING 08/07/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE ACCOETNTING PERIOD: 2/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND e~TION CRITERIA: transact.crans_date between "07/31/2000" and "08/04/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 578964 1020 578964 1020 578964 TOTAL CHECK ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 08/04/00 690 SUNNYVALE FORD 6308840 08/04/00 690 SIJ~i~LE FORD 6308840 08/04/00 690 SUNNYVALE FORD 6308840 1020 578965 V 1020 578965 1020 578965 V 1020 578965 V 1020 578965 1020 578965 V 1020 578965 1020 578965 TOTAL CHECK 08/04/00 701 TARGET STORES 1108312 08/04/00 701 TARGET STORES 1108303 08/04/00 701 TARGET STORES 1108303 08/04/00 701 TARGET STORES 5606620 08/04/00 701 TARGET STORES 1108312 08/04/00 701 TARGET STORES 1108303 08/04/00 701 TARGET STORES 1108303 08/04/00 701 TARGET STORES 5606620 1020 578966 08/04/00 727 U S POSTMASTER 1103400 1020 578967 08/04/00 730 UNITED STATES POSTAL SER 1104310 1020 578968 08/04/00 1154 UNITED WAY OF SANTA CLAR 110 1020 578969 578970 08/04/00 750 VISION SERVICE PLAN 110 08/04/00 745 VMI INC 1103501 1020 578971 08/04/00 302 WASHINGTON MU~ 110~ 1020 578972 08/04/00 768 W~ST GROUP 1101500 1020 578973 1020 578973 1020 578973 TOTAL CHECK 08/04/00 1937 08/04/00 1937 08/04/00 1937 WEST VALLEY SECURITY 1106265 WEST VALLEY SECURITY 1104100 WEST VALLEY SECURITY 1104100 1020 578974 08/04/00 774 WESTERN HIGHWAY PRODUCTS 2708405 1020 578975 08/04/00 1986 WESTERN WINDOW TINTING C 1108511 1020 578976 08/04/00 782 TRAVICE WHITTEN 4249210 1020 578977 08/04/00 795 XEROX CORPORATION 1104310 1020 578978 1020 578978 TOTAL CHECK 08/04/00 799 08/04/00 799 ZANKER ROAD LANDFILL 5208003 ZANKER ROAD LANDFILL 1108312 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL FUND ', REPORT RUN DATE 08/07/00 TIME 11:26:36 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... PARTS PARTS PARTS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SALES TAX 4.12 1.26 0.40 10.45 -85.67 50.29 -50.29 0.00 85.67 -104.68 104.68 0.oo 0.00 POSTAGE PERMIT 239 POSTAGE BY PHONE UNITED WAY VISION INSURANCE 8/00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL *WASI~JTL WESTLAW ACCESS 6/00 SUPPLIES SAFE INSTALLATION OF SAFE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 94.46 0.00 94.46 SUPPLIES 0.00 TIME & MATERIAL PROF SVCS 6/27-7/25/00 LEASE AGREEMENT 0.00 0.00 70.57 YARDWASTE PROCESSING COMPOST DELIVERY 0.00 0.00 0.00 1249.96 1249.98 1249.98 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING AMOUNT 54.07 16.51 5.23 137.06 -1124.15 659.85 -659.85 -93.60 1124.15 -1373.56 1373.56 93.60 0.00 7594.50 40000.00 96.75 1918.20 416.77 17344.10 267.06 10.78 1239.46 70.00 1320.24 317.07 339.00 4136.60 926.04 23593.10 400.00 23993.10 424932.74 424932.74 424932.74 RESOLUTION NO. 00-227 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS EXPENDITURES FOR THE PERIOD ENDING AUGUST I 1 , 2000 WHEREAS, thc Director of Administrative Services or her designated representative has certified to accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the mounts and fi.om the funds as hereinafter set forth in Exhibit "A". CERTIFIED: Director of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21stday of August ,2000, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino 08/11/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/01 C~ECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "08/07/2000" and "08/11/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 577425 V 1020 577672 V 1020 578372 V 1020 578979 1020 578980 1020 578980 1020 578980 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578981 1020 578982 1020 578983 1020 578984 1020 578984 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578985 1020 578986 1020 578987 1020 578987 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578988 1020 578989 1020 578990 1020 578990 1020 578990 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578991 1020 578991 TOTAL CHECK 1020 578992 1020 578993 1020 578994 1020 578994 TOTAL CHECK ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 05/26~00 M 06/09/00 M 07/12/00 1409 08~07/00 1990 08/07/00 513 08/07/00 513 08/07/00 513 CITY CLERKS' ASSOCIATION 1104300 CITY CLERKS' ASSOCIATION 1104300 TI~ RAPIDS WATERSLIDE ACECAD INC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 5806349 1108503 5606620 1108602 1108407 08/07/00 513 08/07/00 513 08/07/00 513 08/07/00 513 08/07/00 513 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1108602 1108503 1108530 4209110 4209110 08/07/00 513 08/08/00 1991 08/09/00 437 08/09/00 437 PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC 1108407 MIKE'S TRUCK ACCESSORIES 2708405 METRO NEWSPAPERS 5208003 METRO NEWSPAPERS 5208003 08/ii/00 1998 08/ii/00 1997 o~/ii/oo 13 08/11/00 13 o8/il/OO 13 A-1 SEPTIC TANK SERVICE 5606660 ABOR CARE 5606620 ACME & SONS SANITATION C 5208003 ACME & SONS SANITATION C 1108303 ACME & SONS SANITATION C 1108321 os/ii/oo 18 o~/il/OO 18 ADONA OIL CORPORATION ADONA OIL CORPORATION 1108005 2708405 08/11/00 1533 08/11/00 1343 08/11/00 1903 08/ii/oo i903 AN ARRAY OF FLOWERS 5606620 ROSE-MARIE ANDICHOU 5606620 ARCHCO 6104800 ARCHCO 6104800 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... CONFERENCE/M PRESTON REGISTRATION/M PRESTON PARKING 7/14/00 SUPPLIES GAS 7/00 ELECTRIC 7/00 ELECTRIC 7/0O ELECTRIC 7/00 ELECTRIC 5/00-7/00 CLOSING BILL 8/99 GAS 7/00 GAS 7/00 ELECTRIC 6/oo-8/oo PARTS & SUPPLIES 1/4 SO AD/GARAGE SALE 1/4 SQ AD/F2%Z WASTE SERVICE HAZARD PRUNE TOILET RENTAL TOILET RENTAL TOILET RENTAL DIAZ WASTE DISPOSAL DIAZ WASTE DISPOSAL SUPPLIES PERFORMER RANDALL CHUN 7/24-7/30 RANDALL CHUN 7/17-7/23 SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0'0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00 PAGE I AMOUNT -183.79 -175.00 -50.00 26.39 13.40 8.09 6.81 28.30 88.10 248.67 13.82 144.86 5.55 150.41 ~6 172.12 226.80 226.80 453.60 1280.00 2640. O0 168.82 2173.20 308.26 2650.28 2000.00 1125.00 3125.00 76.13 270.00 0.00 1942,50 0.00 3400,00 0.00 ~ $0 RUN DATE 08/11/00 TIME 09:47:05 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 08/11/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 2 ACCOLTNTING PERIOD: 2/01 C~CK REGIS~R - DISB~T~ ~ UTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "08/07/2000" and "08/11/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL ~JND CA~H ACCT CRECK NO ISSUE DT -~ ............ V~OR ............. FUND/DEPT ..... DESCRIPTION SALES TAX AMOUNT 1020 578995 08/11/00 M2001 ASK~I, D~q/q 110 1020 578996 0~/11/00 91 DR JOEL BERGER 5806449 1020 578997 08/11/00 96 BLACK MT SPRING WATER 5606620 1020 578998 08/11/00 105 ELY M BRANDES 5506549 1020 578999 08/11/00 M2001 BY~AY, SHIRLEY 5500000 1020 579000 08/11/00 2002 CAL-DEMO INC 1107504 1020 579001 08/11/00 127 ~ CJLLIFORNIA C~L 1103500 1020 579002 08/11/00 130 1020 579003 08/11/00 124 C~IFORNIA PARK AND RECR 1106500 C3LLIFORNIA SAFETY AND SU 1108503 1020 579004 08/11/00 1476 CANNON DESIGN GROT/P 110 1020 579004 08/11/00 1476 CANNON DESIGN GROUP 110 1020 579004 08/11/00 1476 C~ON DESIGN GROUP 110 579004 08/11/00 1476 C~ON DESIGN GROUP 110 579004 08/11/00 1476 C~ON DESIG~ GROUP 110 1020 579004 08/11/00 1476 C~ON DESIGN GROUP 110 1020 579004 08/11/00 1474 CANNON DESIGN G~OUP 110 1020 579004 08/11/00 1476 C~ON DESIGN GROUP 110 1020 579004 08/11/00 1476 C-I~NNON DESIGN GROUP 110 1020 579004 08/11/00 1476 C~ON DESIGN GROUP 110 1020 579004 08/11/00 1476 CA~INON DESIGN GROUP 110 TOTAL C~ECK 1020 579005 08/11/00 M2001 C~IO 1020 579006 08/11/00 1777 LORI CA~ 1020 579007 08/11/00 146 1020 579007 08/11/00 146 1020 579007 08/11/00 146 1020 579007 08/11/00 146 CASH 1020 579007 08/11/00 146 1020 579007 08/11/00 146 CASH 1020 579007 08/11/00 146 TOT~J, CHECK 1020 579008 08/11/00 148 C.~H 1020 579008 08/11/00 148 C~H 1020 579008 08/11/00 148 CASH 1020 579008 08/11/00 148 CASH ~ 579008 08/11/00 148 C~H 579008 08/11/00 148 CASH 1103300 5606620 5806349 1106248 1106265 1106248 1106342 5806449 1106342 1108501 1108201 1108501 6308840 1108501 1108501 REFUND BOND/R3482 0,00 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 INSTRUCTION 0.00 0.00 DEMOLITION/19337 PHIL 0.00 BROADCAST FEE 8/00 0.00 MI~4BERSHI P P~AL 0.00 PARTS & SUPPLIES 0.00 R7773 R8156 R7757 R7776 R6175 R8178 R7493 R6006 R7437 R7769 R6175 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PERFOR]V~R 0.00 P~',:£f CASH REIMBURSEME PETTY CASH REIPBtURSEME PETTY CASH REIBURSEMEN P~.qT¥ CASH REIMBURSW. MW. P~-rz'~ CASH REIMBURSEME PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME PET~ CASH REIMBURS~ME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEM~ P=-rl'f CASH REIMBURSEME P~-rr~ CASH REIMBURSEME PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME P~-~r~ CASH REI~URSEME PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54 O0. O0 84.00 183.10 SO0.O0 200.00 20555.00 223.13 140.00 318.90 660.00 660.00 440.00 660.00 220.00 220.00 220.00 220.00 220.00 220.00 770.00 4510.00 125.00 180.00 45.14 14.78 24.04 28.84 40.00 34.93 9.89 197.62 34.93 6.60 31.26 10.36 14.69 1.08 RUN DAR 08/11/00 TI~ 09:47:06 - FIN~CIAL ACCOL~iTING 08/11/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "08/07/2000" and "08/11/2000" FUND . 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 579008 08/11/00 148 CASH 1108501 1020 579008 08/11/00 148 CASH 1108501 1020 579008 08/11/00 148 C~H 6308840 1020 579008 08/11/00 148 C_A~H 6308840 TOTAL CHECK 1020 579009 1020 579010 1020 579011 1020 579011 TOTAL CHECK 1020 579012 10~0 579013 1020 579014 1020 579015 1020 579016 1020 579017 1020 579018 1020 579019 1020 579020 1020 579021 1020 579021 1020 579021 TOTAL CHECK 1020 579022 1020 579023 1020 579024 1020 579025 1020 579026 1020 579026 1020 579026 1020 579026 1020 579026 1020 579026 08/11/00 1820 08/11/00 916 08/11/00 183 08/11/00 183 CERIDIAN BE~EFITS SERVIC 110 COMPUTER XTRAS XPRESS 6104800 COTTON SHIRES & ASSO IN 110 COTTON SHIRES & ASSO IN 1100000 o8/11/oo 184 o8/11/oo198 0B/11/00 M2001 o8/11/oo M2001 08/11/00 211 0B/ll/00 M2001 08/11/00 218 08/11/00 1999 08/11/00 233 08/11/00 1995 0B/ll/00 1995 08/11/00 1995 JAMES COURTNEY 5606620 CUPERTINO UNION SC~L DIS 5806449 DAY-TIMERS INC 1103300 DE ANZA COLLEGE 2204010 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CA 110 DEPARTMENT OF CONSD]~ER A 1108601 DESIGN SIGNS 5606620 E-Z ROOTER & PLUMBING 1108506 ECONOMIC DRIVING SCHOOL 5806249 EDISON SELECT 5606620 EDISON SELECT 5606680 EDISON SELECT 5606620 08/11/00 1434 08/11/00 930 0B/11/00 240 08/11/00 234 08/11/00 260 08/11/00 260 08/11/00 260 08/11/00 260 08/11/00 260 08/11/00 260 EDWARD S. W;LTaSH CO. 1108303 DEBORAH ELLIS, A~CA 4249210 ELIZABETH ANN ELLIS 1101070 ENGINEERING DATA SERVICE 110 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FEDE~%L EXPRESS CORP FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 1107301 4209430 2709438 4209430 1104000 2708404 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... PETTY CASH REIMEURSEME PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME PETTY CASH REIMBURSEME ADMIN FEES 7/00 SUPPLIES PROF SVCS R8153 22820 SAN JUi~N RD PERFORMER RECREATION PROGRAM RENEWAL CALENDAR FILLE L C GRADUATION LUNCH DENTAL INSURANCE 8/00 RENEWAL FEE/R CHONG SIGNS PROF SVC RECREATION PROGRAM ALARM 7/1-9/30/00 ~ 7/1-9/30/00 ALARM 7/1-9/30/00 PARTS & SUPPLIES TREE EVALUATION TRANSCRIPTION R7451 STANDARD OVERNIGHT STANDARD OVERNIGHT STANDARD OVERNIGHT STANDARD OVERNIGHT STANDARD OVERNIGHT STANDARD OVERNIGHT SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ' 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 PAGE 3 AMOUNT 20.72 38.87 13.77 8.75 181.03 32.80 670.99 1855.50 2005.50 3861.00 595.00 142.42 30.29 250.00 127 98 160.00 110.36 130.00 2700.00 86.46 102.21 102.69 291.36 8.88 186.66 425.00 62.41 39.54 18.60 17.56 167.44 .23~66 RUN DATE 08/11/00 TIME 09:47:07 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 08/11/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE 4 ACCOL~NT/NG PERIOD: 2/01 C~ECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND --~CTION CRITERIA: Cransac~.nran$_date becween #08/07/2000" and #O8/11/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 579026 1020 579026 TOT~L CHECK 1020 579027 08/11/00 268 1020 579028 08/11/00 1526 1020 579029 08/11/00 277 1020 579030 08/11/00 282 1020 579031 08/11/00 1228 1020 579032 08/11/00 M2001 1020 579033 08/11/00 341 1020 579034 08/11/00 1969 1020 579035 08/11/00 2003 579036 08/11/00 1412 1020 579037 08/11/00 806 1020 579038 08/11/00 363 1020 579039 08/11/00 1630 1020 579040 08/11/00 395 1020 579041 08/11/00 1347 1020 579041 08/11/00 1347 TOTAL CHECK 1020 579042 08/11/00 400 1020 579043 08/11/00 1263 1020 579044 08/11/00 1968 1020 579045 08/11/00 431 1020 579045 08/11/00 431 1020 579045 08/11/00 431 1020 579045 08/11/00 431 1020 579045 08/11/00 431 TOTAL CH~CK 579046 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 08/1i/00 260 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 1107301 08/11/00 260 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 1104300 FOSTER BROS SECURITY SYS 1108303 MIRIAM FRANK 5506549 JOHN FUNG 5806249 GARROD FARMS/STABLES 5806449 LIZZ HODGIN 5806249 HuANG, SOPHIA 110 ICE CHALET 5806449 GAIL JENSEN 2204011 JM CONSTRUCTION 1107504 JOBS AVAILABLE INC 1104510 WENDELL JAMES JOHNSON JR 1108314 JUST PLAY SPORTS ACADEMY 5806449 KIDZ LOVE SOCCER INC 5806449 RICHARD LEE 5806249 H~LEN LEPLEY 5606620 H~LEN LEPLEY 5606620 LIFETIME TENNIS INC 5706450 AL LOPEZ 5606620 MAZE AND ASSOCIATES 1104000 MC WHORTER'S OFFICE PROD 1108501 MC WHORTER'S OFFIC~ PROD 5506549 MC WHORTER'S OFFICE PROD 5806349 MC WHORT~R'S OFFICE PROD 5806449 MC WHORTER'S OFFICE PROD 1108315 08/11/00 1780 MCCRARY CONSTUCTION CO~4P 4249210 ..... DESCRIPTION STANDARD OVERNGIMT EXPRESS SAVER PARTS & SUPPLIES INSTRUCTION RECREATION PROGRAM RECREATION PROGRAM RECREATION PROGRAM REFUND/R4987 RECREATION PROGRAM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CLF, AN UP/20091 LA RODA BLOCK AD TIME & MATERIAL RECREATION PROGRAM RECREATION PROGRAM RECREATION PROGRAM PERFORMER RECREATION PROGRAM TENNIS INSTRUCTION PERFOg/~ER FINANCIAL AUDIT SVCS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES CUPERTINO SR CfR SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 MOUNT 49.56 12.21 347.17 258.61 320.00 72.75 640.00 1811.20 15000.00 3762.00 375.00 17241.20 184.00 225.00 5147.75 14334.40 409.75 90,00 360,00 450.00 24492,06 50.00 2011.25 37.37 47.76 24.64 5.98 23.35 139.10 172889.10 RUN DATE 08/11/00 TIME 09:47:07 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 08/11/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "08/07/2000" and "08/11/2000" FL~TD - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 579047 08/11/00 443 1020 579047 08/11/00 443 1020 579047 08/11/00 443 1020 579047 08/11/00 443 1020 579047 08/11/00 443 TOTAL CHECK 1020 579048 08/11/00 455 1020 579049 08/11/00 1385 1020 579050 08/11/00 461 1020 579051 08/11/00 1751 1020 579052 08/11/00 1341 1020 579053 08/11/00 1550 1020 579054 08/11/00 489 1020 579055 08/11/00 1970 1020 579056 08/11/00 499 1020 579057 08/11/00 2004 1020 579058 08/11/00 500 1020 579058 08/11/00 500 TOTAL CHECK 1020 579059 1020 579060 1020 579060 TOTAL CHECK 1020 579061 1020 579062 1020 579063 1020 579064 1020 579064 1020 579064 1020 579064 TOTAL CHECK 1020 579065 MILLENNIUM MECHANICAL IN 5606620 MILLENNIUM MECHANIC3%L IN 1108504 MILLRNNIUM MECH~NICAL IN 4209216 MILLENNIUM MECHANICAL IN 1108503 MILLENNIUM MECH~NICAL IN 5708510 HEATHER MOLL 5806249 DENNIS MORAN 5606620 MOREI~ SCHOOL DIS~RICT 5806349 MUNIFINANCIAL 3655301 ROBERTA NAVARRO 5606620 ADONIS L NECESIT0 1103500 NOTEWORTHY MUSIC SCHOOL 5806249 B~ug~ARA~K/N-ES 2204011 DEBBIE O'NEILL 5606620 OBI DISTRIBUTORS INC 5706450 OPERATING ENGINEERS 110 OPERATING ENGINEERS 1104510 08/11/00 515 08/11/00 S45 08/11/00 545 PACIFIC WEST SECURITY IN 1108507 JEFF PISERCHIO 5606640 JEFF PISERCHIO 5606640 08/11/00 1456 08/11/00 1071 08/11/00 600 08/11/00 602 08/11/00 602 08/11/00 602 08/11/00 602 PITNEY BOWES INC 1108201 R~PUBLIC ELECTRIC 2709435 ROTO-ROO~R SEWER SERVIC 5606620 ROYAL COAC~ TOURS 5506549 ROYAL COAC~ TOURS S506549 ROYAL COACH TOURS 5506549 ROYAL COACH TOURS 5506549 08/11/00 1417 J~IFER ROZWOOD 5606620 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SALES TAX TIME & MATERIAL 0.00 TIME & M3%TERIltL 0.00 TIME & MATERIAL 0.00 TIME & MATERIAL 0.00 TIME & MATERIAL 0.00 0.00 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 PERFORMER 0.00 ~%NSPORTATION 0.00 ARBITRAGE REBATE SVCS 0.00 PERFORMER 0.00 PROF SVCS 0.00 RECREATION PROGRAM 0.00 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 0.00 PERFORMER 0.00 SUPPLIES 0.00 HLTH/WELFARE PW F24P 0.00 HLTR/WELFARE RETIRED 0.00 0.00 SERVICE C2%LL 0.00 PROF SVCS 0.00 REIMBURSEMENT 0.00 0.00 COPIER MAINT/USAGE 0.00 S~ETY IMPROV PROJECT 0.00 SEWER LINE CLEANOUT 0.00 TRANSPORTATION 0.00 TRANSPORTATION 7/19/00 0.00 TP~%NSPORTATiON 7/9/00 0.00 TRANSPORTATION 0.00 0.00 PERFORMER 0.00 PAGE 5 AMOUNT. 75.00 75.00 796.19 75.00 75.00 1096.19 54.00 200.00 860.60 1250.00 180.00 450.00 4183.20 375.00 73.67 5972.00 3750.00 9722.00 75.00 1790.00 248.95 2038.95 113.11 2917.29 192.00 344.71 497.09 339.25 473.19 1654.24 50~.00 RUR DATE 08/11/00 TIME 09:47:08 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 0B/ll/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE ACCOU1TTXNG PERIOD: 2/Ol CHECK REGIS~i~R - DXSBURSE~ ~ CTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "08/07/2000# and "08/11/2000" FUND - 110 - GENER~.L FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 579066 1020 579067 1020 579067 TOTAL CHECK 1020 579068 ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 08/11/00 M2001 SAMPSON. THELMA 5506549 08/11/00 1442 SItN JOSE ICE COMPANY 5606620 08/11/00 1442 SAN JOSE ICE COMPANY 5606620 08/11/00 979 CITY OF SAN JOSE 1108602 1020 579069 08/11/00 628 1020 579070 08/11/00 633 1020 579071 1020 579071 1020 579071 1020 579071 10~0 579071 1020 579071 1020 579071 TOTAL CHECK 579072 3 579073 1020 579073 TOTAL CHECK 1020 579074 1020 579075 1020 579076 1020 579077 1020 579078 1020 579078 TOTAL CHECK 1020 579079 1020 579080 1020 579081 1020 579082 1020 579083 1~0 579084 SANTA CLARA COUN~ SHERI 1102100 SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERI 5806349 08/11/00 639 SAVIN CORPORATION 5506549 08/11/00 639 SAVIN CORPORATION 5806449 08/11/00 639 SAVIN CORPORATION 1104310 08/11/00 639 SAVIN CORPORATION 5806249 08/11/00 639 SAVIN CORPORATION 5706450 08/11/00 639 SAVIN CORPORATION 1104310 08/11/00 639 SAVIN CORPORATION 5806349 08/11/00 M2001 08/11/00 1890 08/11/00 1890 SCAN-NATOA/CITY OF TORRA 1103300 SCHWAAB INC 1101000 SCHWAAB INC 1101200 08/11/00 1449 08/11/00 651 08/11/00 1910 08/11/00 659 08/11/00 1954 08/11/00 1954 SENIOR ADULTS LEGAL ASSI 2607404 SIERRA PACIFIC TURF SUPP 5606640 SILICON SHOP. ES INC SKYIiAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY SPHERION CORPORATION SPHERION CORPORATION 5806449 5806449 1104300 1107301 08/11/00 668 08/11/00 891 08/11/00 1011 08/11/00 681 08/11/00 686 o8/11/oo M2001 SPINNAKER SAILING 5806449 JOAN SPITSRN 5500000 STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZAT 110 CONNIE BANDA S~EVENS 5806449 DARRYL STOW 2204010 SUBSCRIPTION SERVICE 1108303 RUN DATE 08/11/00 TIME 09:47:08 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES SUPPLIES MAINT TRAFFIC SIGNAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 8/00 SECURITY COPY PLAN 5/8-8/8/00 COPY PLAN 5/8-8/8/00 COPY PLAN 5/8-8/8/00 COPY PLAN 5/8-8/8/00 COPY PLAN 5/8-8/8/00 COPIER OVERAGE 5/8-8/8 COPY PLAN 5/8-8/8/00 MEMBERSHIP DUES S IGNATURI~ STAMP CUSTOMER STAF~ QUAR%'ER ENDING 6/30/00 SUPPLIES ' RECREATION PROGRAM I~:CREAT I ON PROGRAM SANDRA BERNARD AJA ALVE RECRF, ATI ON PROGRAM TOUR & REFREShmENTS PREPMT/SALES & USE TAX RECREATION PROGRAM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SUBSCRIPTION SALESTAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.85 27.85 243.19 121.60 5.09 86.94 60.80 573.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - FINANCIAL ACCOONTING AMOUNT 37.37 200.00 200.00 400.00 2495.67 427099.50 266.14 365.49 365.48 3191.00 1595.50 66.78 1140.85 797.75 7522.85 25.00 32.56 52.05 84.61 1250.00 39.09 1773.00 11685.60 780.00 432.00 1212.00 81.00 246.00 5547.00 400.00 750.00 89.00 08/11/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND SELECTION CRITERIA: transact.trans_date between "08/07/2000" and "08/11/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO 1020 579085 1020 579086 1020 579087 1020 579088 1020 579089 1020 579090 1020 579090 1020 579090 1020 579090 1020 579090 TOTAL CHECK 1020 579091 1020 579092 1020 579093 1020 579094 1020 579095 1020 579096 1020 579096 TOT$tL CHECK 1020 579097 1020 579097 TOTAL CHECK 1020 579098 1020 579099 1020 579099 1020 579099 1020 579099 1020 579099 TOTAL CHECK 1020 579100 1020 579101 1020 579101 TOTAL CHECK 1020 579102 ISSUE DT .............. ~NDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 08/11/00 1883 08/11/00 M2001 08/11/00 696 08/11/00 698 08/11/00 M2001 08/11/00 700 08/11/00 700 08/11/00 700 08/11/00 700 08/11/00 700 SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC 6109854 SUNNYVALE-CUPERTINO BAR 1101500 TADCO SUPPLY 1108312 TALLY'S ENTERPRISES 2708403 TAN, LiE 110 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108303 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108303 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108312 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108303 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCT 1108312 08/11/00 701 08/11/00 M2001 08/11/00 709 08/11/00 710 o8/11/oo 2OOl 08/11/00 728 08/11/00 728 TARGET STORES 5606620 THE KIPLINGER EDITORS 1101200 LOU THURMAN 5806449 KA~ TOOMBS 5806249 PETER.TORRF~O CSR 7623 1104511 UC REGENTS/DEPARTMENT B 1108602 UC REGENTS/DEPARTMENT B 1108601 08/11/00 830 08/11/00 830 UNITED SOIL ENGINEERING 4209114 UNITED SOIL ENGINEERING 4249210 08/11/00 2005 ..... DESCRIPTION ...... PARKS & REC INTERFACE MONTHLY MEETING PARTS & SUPPLIES CURB/GUTTER/SIDEWALKS REFUND BOND/R49500 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUBSCRIPTION RECRF, ATION PROGRAM RECRF, ATION PROGRAM COURT REPORTING R CHONG R CHONG FOUNDATION INSPECTION TESTING/INSPECTION SVC VAL FORMS INC 1104100 SUPPLIES 08/11/00 745 VMI INC 1103500 08/11/00 745 VMI INC 1103500 08/11/00 745 VMI INC 1103500 08/11/00 745 VMI INC 1103500 08/11/00 745 VMI INC 1103500 VESTA WALDEN 8606620 JOYC~ WATERFdtN 5606620 JOYCE WA~ 5606620 08/11/00 1342 o8/11/oo ~57 08/11/00 757 08/11/00 1131 CIDDY WORDELL 1107301 NACOM COMPUTER ECHOLAB INPUT MODULE COLOR MONITOR/CSI SCAN SDI DAUGHteR CARD MONITOR/BATTERY PACK PERFORMER RECREATION PROGRAM PERFORMER SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 86.21 50.29 39.29 104.68 85.67 366.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 119.63 521.48 279.26 143.55 410.19 1474.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AMOUNT 4500.00 25.00 250.49 56811.96 9090.00 1131.17 659.85 S15.49 1373.56 1124.15 4804.22 93.60 38.00 831.36 4 39.60 150.00 295.00 445.00 250.00 347.50 597.'50 248.46 1569.63 6862.48 3688.43 1888.55 5408.42 19417.51 495.00 360.00 540.00 900.00 RUN DATE 08/11/00 TIME 09:47:09 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 08/11/00 CITY OF CUPERTINO PAGE ACCOUNTING PERIOD: 2/01 CHECK REGISTER - DISBURSEMENT FUND i-r I ON CRITERIA: ~ransac~.=rans_date between "08/07/2000" and "08/11/2000" FUND - 110 - GENERAL FUND CASH ACCT CHECK NO ISSUE DT .............. VENDOR ............. FUND/DEPT 1020 579103 08/11/00 2000 XPECT FIRST AID 110B501 1020 579103 ~8/11/00 2000 XPECT FIRST AID 1108503 1020 579103 08/11/00 2000 XPECT FIRST AID 1108509 1020 579103 08/11/00 2000 XPECT FIRST AID 1108504 1020 579103 08/11/00 2000 XPECT FIRST AiD 1108503 1020 579103 08/11/00 2000 XPECT FIRST AID 1108507 TOTAL CHECK 1020 579104 08/11/00 1558 JOSE ZUNIGA JR 1106265 TOTAL CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL FUND TOTAL REPORT ..... DESCRIPTION ...... SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SECURITY STAFF 7/29/00 SALES TAX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2413.57 2413.57 2413.57 AMOUNT 326.05 420.08 82.51 201.8o 746.24 123.42 1900.10 105.00 924193.34 924193.34 924193.34 -70 RUN DATE 08/11/00 TIME 09:47:09 - FINANCIAL ACCOUNTXN(~ RESOLUTION NUMBER 00-215 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR SALARIES AND WAGES PAID ON JULY 21, 2000 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services, or their designated representative has certified to the accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law; NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds set forth: GROSS PAYROLL Less Employee Deductions $391,849.42 $(121,589.67) NET PAYROLL $270,259.75 Payroll check numbers issued 48486 through 48748 Void check number 48484 Director of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st day of ,~ugust · ,2000, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino RESOLUTION NUMBER 00-216 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS PAYABLE IN THE AMOUNTS AND FROM THE FUNDS AS HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR SALARIES AND WAGES PAID ON AUGUST 04, 2000 WHEREAS, the Director of Administrative Services, or their designated representative has certified to the accuracy of the following claims and demands and to the availability of funds for payment hereof; and WHEREAS, the said claims and demands have been audited as required by law; NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby allows the following claims and demands in the amounts and from the funds set forth: GROSS PAYROLL Less Employee Deductions $409,592.03 $(126,297.30) NET PAYROLL $283,294.73 Payroll check numbers issued 48749 through 49022 Void check number CERTIFIED: - D-~r~ctor of Administrative Services PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st day of August ,2000, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino CITY OF CUPEP INO City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (405) 777-3220 FAX: (408) 777-3366 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Agenda Item No. b SUMMARY Meeting Date: August 21, 2000 SUBJECT Monthly Treasurer's and Budget Report - June 2000 BACKGROUND Attached is the Treasurer's and Budget report for the period ended June 30, 2000, The report includes all funds in control of the City. Investments The market value of our current portfolio totaled $43.9 million at month end with a maturity value of $44.2 million. The City intends to hold investments until maturity to redeem full value of the securities currently with a maturity value below market value. The increase in our current investment portfolio of $1.3 million is a result of the Tax Equity Allocation payment received from the County of Santa Clara. The investments of the City of Cupertino are in full compliance with our City investment policy and/or State law. Investments are tiered to adequately provide the City with sufficient cash flows to pay its obligations over the next six months. Revenue/Expenditure Trends General fund revenues exceed budget projections at the end of June by 17.14%. Operating expenditures for the General Fund remain below budget by 3.67%. Printed on Recycled Pa~er RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council review and accept the June Treasurer's and Budget report. Submitted by: E°isA~. Eagle Deputy Treasurer Approved for submission: Da~c~ WTKnapp City Manager City of Cupertino Budget Report Actual Actual % of Budget 670/~__.-_~' - -f_' ~._~' i.!998/~J9 Budget' 1999/00 Budget YTD 06-30-99 YTD 06-30-00 0~e[~Jntier A_na!ysis 01~T-rends .- .... i .... GENERAL FUND Taxes: Sales Tax ....... ~,~0~,000 9,49:7,000 8,645,903 12,530,4:7i --' ~i.94% _ ~op_e_ r~y___T_nx ............... 3,708,000 3,_862,000 _3,2'!7,!91 4,020,891 4.1 I% ?r_n_n_chi?~ &_Lic~_n_se ......... 2,0_2__7,000 2,39-3,000 2,1! !,!66 2,_373,831 ._ -_0.8_0_% Other !,628,000 2,0 i 5,000 1,695,795 1,954,815 -2.99% Construction tax lower than expected !n_terg__o_v...e~mental .............. 2_,_g_41,3~!.... ~_ ~,4.90,706 2,763,2_82: 2,967,8i7 19:!60/? inc_reaSe~i g~ant and motor vehicle revenues C har_ges~ _f_°r__S_e__rv_ ices .............. 2,_128,000 _ 1,465,000 2,256_:4_4_3. 1,874,336 2__7.94_% Fines & Forfeitures 505,000 361,000 503,223 524,057 45.17% Increased Parking citations Other Revenue _ 61_~0_00 !6_1,000 _. 201,967, 618,167 ~28-3_.95% Sale of property Total Revenue _. 25_,6_76_,-3~[ ..... _26,482 706 _ 26,153,180 31 022 2~0 . . 17.14% Operating Expenditures: Administrative !, 168,0 i 7 1,426,787 1,133,408 i ,321,798 -7.36% Law Enforcement 5,008,479 5,275,673 4,892,704 4,688,893 - 1 i. 12% Community Service 631,465 736,281 63 i ,036 796,458 8.17% Administrative Service 2, i 10,092 2,479,812 2,00 i ,746 2,392,929 -3.50% Recreation Service i,365,016 '1,516,572 1,363,410 i,626,427 7.24% Community Development 1,871,868 1,994,83 ! 1,871,242 2,194,272 10.00% Public Works 7,912,243 8,206,032 7,276,838 7,821,171 -4.69% Total Expenditures ....... 20,06_7,[8_0 i'~-' 21,63~,~}89 _ 19, i:70,~8~' ~_ 20,1i4i,947 '_.' -_3:6:7% ' Operating Transfers In 1, I 16,350 725,000 I, ! 16,350 725,000 0.00% Operatin[_T_ r_ansfers__O_ut ..... -18,54_ 1_!70 _ 78,845,391 -18,541,1:70 '-8,845,391 0.00% Netlncome/Loss 2~i~9 - --5,273,674 ?10,44:},024 .. 2,059,952 -168.65% Page 1 Rate of Return ComparisJon 6.40% 6.20% 6.00% 5.80% 5.60% 5.40% 5.20% 5.00% 6/99 7/99 8/99 9~99 10/99 11/99 12/99 1/00 2/00 3~00 4/00 5/00 6/00 · LAIF --~--CupeAino Investments By Type Managed Portfolio c.,asl~ 0% Corporate Bonds 0% LAIF 31% US Treasury Note 47% Money Market 7% Mortgage Obligation 15% City of Cupertino June 2000 ACTIVITY DATE PURCHASE I MATURITY }'KEF] iE ~'1 ADJUSTED]MATURITY[ MARKET ]UNREALIZED DESCRIPTION Y LD COST VALUE VALUE PROFIT/LoS-g- SECURITIES SOLD None SECURITIES MATURED 12/12/90 06/30/00 '1 reasury Note ~6a 6.00% 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 ' 12/12/96 06/30/00 Treasury Note ~6a 6.00% 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 SECURITIES PURCHASED None CURRENT PORTFOLIO CASH 06/30/00. ;Cupertino National 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CORPORATE BONDS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LAIF 06/30/00 :State Pool 16f 6.18%: 13,$67,962 13,567,962 13,$67,962 ! 0 MONEY MARKET FUNDS 06/30/00 Cupertino Natl Bank 16j 5.61% 0 06/30/00 'Cupertino NatI-Sweep account ~6j 5.51% 06/30/00 !Schwab 16j 5.37%' 0 0 280,625 280,625 280,6251 2,038,033 '~ 2,038,033 ' 2,038,033 ' 579,391 i 579,391 579,391 2,898,048 i 2,898,048i 2,898,0481 MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS -'- 07/09/93 04/15/07 .FHLMC(P) 09/30/93 09/15/07 FHLMC(P) - 09/30/93 05/15/08 FHLMC(P) ~6k 6.11% ~6k 7.42% i6k 6.62% 1,019,730 ~ 1,000,000 i 990,580: (29,150} 2,501,100 i 2,400,000 ~ 2,418,936 (82,164) 2,946,627 i 2,860,0001 2,753,408 (193,220} 6,467,457 i 6,260,000 6,162,924: (304,533 Ug GOVERNMENT SECURITIES 08/04/97 11/30/00 Treasury Note 08/06/97 05/31/01 Treasury Note 08/29/97 07/31/00 :Treasury Note 10/08/97 09/30/00 Treasury Note - 10/08/97 03/31/01 Treasury Note 10/08/97 09/30/01 'Treasury Note 06/25/99 11/30/02 ~Treasury Note 01/10/00 12/31/01 iTreasury Note 01/10/00 06/30/02 Treasury Note --01/14/00 08/17/00 :Treasury Note - 02/07/00 06/30/03 Treasury Note Total Managed Portfolio Average Yield ,Average Length to Maturity (in years) 6.01% 6.05%1 6.03% 5.71% 5.75%i 5.79% 5.90%1 6.31% 6.33%1 5.75% 6.62% [6a i6a ,6a t6a i6a i6a i6a i6a 1.40[ 2,496,357 i 2,500,000' 2,492,975 (3,382} 2,509,106! 2,500,000! 2,500,775 i (8,331) 1,000,073 ~ 1,000,000 ! 1,000,310 '~ 237 1,o0o,951 i ~,ooo,oooi l,OOO,OOO~ (951} 2,008,360I 2,000,000 ! 1,997,5001 (10,860} 2,012,974I 2,000,000 ! 1,996,260! (16,714} 2,498,662 I 2,500,000 I 2,463,275'' (35,3871 2,493,456] 2,500,0001 2,485,950 i (7,506) 2,496,522 ! 2,500,000'. 2,491,4001 (5,122} 496,3371 500,000I 496,255 I (82) 2,417,491 i 2,500,000! 2,435,150 [ 17,659 21,430,2891 21~00,000i 21,359,850! (70,439} 44,363,757 44,226,010 i 43,988,784 i (374,973 City of Cupertino June 2000 ACTIVITY DATE PURCHASE [ MATURITY DESCRIPTION REF yIELD COST VALUE VALUE UNREALIZED PROFIT/LOSS TRUST & AGENCY PORTFOLIO CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT: " 07/26/99 06/27/00 Cupertino Natl(Kester Trust ) ,6b 4.15% 36,816 36,816 36,816 Total Trust & Agency Portfolio 36,816 36,816 36,816 BOND RESERVE PORTFOLIO Traffic Impact Franklin Fiduciary Trust 5.68% 19,100 ' 19,100 19,100 Project Fund City Hail Escrow A Lease Fund (#400954) 5.65% 547,7201 547,720 547,720 Memoriai?~v'iison B Lease Fund (//400960) 5.64%, 988,459! 988,459 988,459 Blackberry/Fremont 1993 Series A (0400969) 3.80% 734,909 ~ 734,909 734,909 Memorial/Wilson Escrow B (#400948) Cash 6,744,951: 6,744,951 6,744,951 6,744,951 6,744,951 6,744,951 Escrow Reserves 04/06/93 12/16/92 12/16/92 01/01/03 Repro - Escrow A (400972) 12/16/99 Repro - Escrow A (400957) 12/16/99 Repro - Escrow B (400963) 6.25% 2,921,506[ 2,921,506[ 2,921,506i 6.10% 853,037[ 853,037i 853,037 6.10% 1,355,836i 1,355,836; 1,355,836 ~ 5,130379 i 5,130379 i 5,130379; Blackberry/Fremont Older 1993 Escrow A (0400966) Cash · -04/06/93 08/15/00 U.S. Treasury 04/06/93 02/15/01 U.S. Treasury Stripped Iht Total 3,496 i 3,496 3,496 6.23%I 917,911[ 915,000i 918,431 i 6.05% 28,043,831[ 28,910,000} 27,954,814: 28,965,239[ 29,828,496! 28,876,741 40,859,669 i 41,722,926 43,042,259 520 (89,0 (88,498] (88,498} Bond Reserve Portfolio City of Cupertino Summary of Budget Transfers 6/30/00 Budget Revenue Expenditure Description : Acct # Adjustment Budget Budget 1999/00 ADOPTED BUDGET : 47,967,000 49,753,447 PROJECT CARRYOVERS ~ various 1998/99 CARRYOVER: : Encumbrances ~ various 3,461,392 3,461,392 Department carryovers : i610-98xx-9400 107,572 107,572 Grant carryovers I110-2401-7014 i 127,689: 127,689 Grant carryovers i i110-2402-7014 28,366 i 28,366 Project carryovers !various 7,989,841 7,989,841 Budget carryovers !various ! 1,166,310: 1,166,310 Budget carryovers : i610-9853-9400 20,000 20,000 REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS: Grant funded projects , various 1,742,354, Grant carryovers !110-0000-4432 , 105,811 Block Grant carryover il 10-00004431 28,366' TCI equipment purchase Local law enforcement block grant 4110-0000-4431 25,529, OTI for property purchase ~420-00004900 470,699 Donation - Lions 560-0000-4811 1,000' Apple in-lieu fees for public art : 110-0000-4811 : 100,000 OTI for Target contribution 1420-0000-4910 : 50,000, TF-CA-Bollinger Rd bike improvement i270-0000-4432 140,000 TFCA-Wolfe Rd bike improvement : ',270-0000-4432 ! ~ 100,000, TFCA-Wolfe Arterial Management 4420-0000-4432 120,000i Authorized Gas Tax appropriation i270-0000-4910 ' 51,840! OTI for IT signmaking system EXPENDITURE ADJUSTMENTS: Youth Leadership 1220-4011-6111 I 5,000 i : 5,000 Grant funded projects ~ !various i 1,742,354i i 1,742,354 City channel equipment i !110-3500-9400 i 155,000[ 155,000 Human service program:i !110-3300-7102 ! 29,585i 29,585 Telecom grant-K. Tully ; il 10-1031-6206 ~. 250! 250 Stelling Rd Annexation i i 4,000 4,000 Local law enforcement block grant i ]110-2402-7014 i 28,366 28,366 SJ Conservation Corp P.O. 29939 ~ l110-8601-7014 I 5,5681 5,568 HR Litigation cost i I 110-4511-7014 25,0001 25,000 Telcom grant adjustment i110-1031-6206 -250 -250 OTO for property purchace i 110-0100-8020 470,699 470,699 Purchase of property ~ [420-9217-8020 i 470,699 I 470,699 Donation - Lions 560-6620-9300 1,000 1,000 Library expanded hours 110-1040-7018 85,000 85,000 Four Seasons Plaza ~ 425-9313-9300 143,000 143,000 -'Four Seasons Art ~425-9314-7014 100,000 100,000 Apple in-lieu fees for public art ii 10-1042-7014 100,000 100,000 OTO for Target contribution i110-0100-8020 50,000 50,000 Traffic signal Saich Way i420-9526-9300 50,000 50,000 Addq appro. To local share projects 1270-9420-9300 51,840 51,840 Add'l appro. To local share projects Il 10-8604-7014 25,000 25,000 TFCA-Bollinger Rd bike improvement 1270-9443-9300 140,000 140,000 TFCA-Bollinger Rd bike improvement !270-9443-9300 35,000 35,000 TFCA-Bollinger Rd bike improvement 1270-9420-9300 -35,000: -35,000 TFCA-Wolfe Rd bike improvement 1270-9440-9300 100,000 100,000 TFCA-Wolfe Arterial Management !420-9529-9300 120,000. 120,000 TFCA-Wolfe Arterial Management 420-9529-9300 30,000 30,000 TFCA-Wolfe Arterial Management 1270-9420-9300 -30,000 -30,000 Authorized Gas Tax appropriation '~ il 0-0100-8020 51,840 51,840 OTO for IT signmaking system :270-0100-8020 18,300~ 18,300 OTO for IT signmaking system : 110-0100-8020 6,8521 6,852 Tsf between Gas Tax projects 1270-9405-9300 -50,0001 -50,000 Tsf between Gas Tax projects i270-9435-9300 50,000 50,000 1999/00 ADJUSTED BUDGET 51,082,791 66,633,721 9,000,000 8,000,000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5,000,000 4.000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000.000 14,000,000 Expenditure Comparison 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Revenue Comparison [ Aaministration Law Enforcement Community Service Admin. Service Recreation Service Community Dev. Public Works · YTD 06/30/99 , E~ Y"I'D 06/30/00 12,000,000 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I Sales Tax 2 Property Tax 3 Utility Tax 4 Franchise & License 5 Other 6 Money and Property 7 Intergovernmental 8 Charges For Services 9 Fines x, Forfeitures l0 Other Revenue , [] Y'DD 06/30/99 ~ · YTD 06/30100 COMPLIANCE WITH INVESTMENT POLICY City of Cupertino June 30, 2000 Category Standard Comment Treasury Issues No limit , Complies US Agencies (eg FHLMC) No limit I Complies Medium Term Corporate Bonds/Notes 30% with A rating i Complies LAIF ;$20 million I Complies Money Market Funds ,20% !Complies Maximum Maturities 125% up to 15 years i Complies (FI-ILMC at 9.5 yrs) " Remainder up to 5 years !Complies Per Issuer Max 10% (except govts) i Complies Bankers Acceptances 270 days & 40% i Complies Commercial Paper ~ 15% i Complies Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 30% I Complies Repurchase Agreements i365 days I Complies Reverse Repurchase agreements ;Prohibited i Complies fn:g:\finance~jessef19900audit.xls 1 of 4 8/17/00 9:43AM Filename:g:\finance~jessef~9900audit\proj600.xls ~n~l ~ bescriPtion CIO enc ~i~ - ~i~ iVii~r §{orr~ brain Impr°v '~0~ 9~0~ ~An~a Rainbow:~rOspea ~70j '- 9~o~ Bar~er RemOval` '~0~ ~6~ ~eA~zai~te~ ~reek {o Alve~ 270 ~22 Stevens Creek Improvements 14,297.00 Stev Cr~Blaney TlS modifi~tion Hmstd belleville TlS modif. Underground Stev C~ Neighborhood ~af ~lming Bike lanes on Tantau ave. Miller Ave bi~e ~,i{i% McClellan pedes safe~ Wolfe bike ~cilitiy improv Bike dete~on enhan~ment Bollinger Pedestrian walk Bollinger Rd bike ~cili~ improv. Saratog~Sunnyv'l TIS inter~nne 13,588.00 Miller at Phil Ramp meter signal 280/85 SR85/Stev Crk TIS modifi~tion McClellan Ranch bldg improv. Pa~ Renovations Stocklmeir Prope~ Acquisition 4,990.00 Stev C~ trail maste~lan Memorial Pa~ bathroom remodel ADA 91 Se~ice ~nter expanison HouSing Assistan~ DeAnza BHdge ~dening Stev Canyon Rd widening 17,732.00 420 9523 85 ~ SN.Creek RT lane 420l 95241De~Stev Creek a,e,al mgmt 4201- 9526{StevensC~'~~ / 117,719'83/ CIO budget 6130100 Adopted 75,000 1,084,743 57,585 15,836 41,839 301,690 32,000 23,824'' 86,500 60,000 - 0 200,000 0 2,000,0-00 6,623 0 75,000 '0: 75,000 0 80,000 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 change (50,0005 50,000 (200,000) 0 12,587 34,076 0 0 100,023 133,000 i0~,338 250,~00 - 20,025 o ~0,b00 ' o 200,060 _ ' 00,o o 0 250,000 0 *YE adj. 470,699 i6,4~o 1,ooo,ooo 5,926 31_2,_1_70_J 2,7381 -,~:~351 50,000 50,000 350,o00 275,000 35,0o0 225,000 26,495 146,000 175,000 0 500,000 75,000 ~otai~ud~ei '~cUmbra~ ~xpendiiure 75,ooo.oo ~,948.62 1,o84,74~.00' 0.~0 55,538.68 ~,585.0O' 0.00 55,999.58 15,836.00 ~,02~.25 41,839.00' " 6,686.13 Current Bal. 71,051.38 1,029,204.32 1,585.42 6,815.75 35,i52.87 251,690.00 5,900.00 17,996.87 227,793.13 ~,006.66' - ~2,o6o.oo 25,441.98 10,028.69 2,752.30 12,660.99 ~5o,000.00 28,795.75 31,306.80 6o,000.0~l' ~,2~2.00- 6,22~.~0 6.06 ...... 2,000,000.00 20,920.00 75,000.00 75,00O.00 80,000.00 i50,060.60 50,000.00 350,000.00 275,000.00 ~,0o0.oo 26,495.00 146,000.00 175,000.00 26,175.00 34,076.00 500,000.00 75,000.00 233,023.02 358,338.00 25,015.00 80,000.00 200,000.00 20,919.28 800.00' 22,220.92 118,577.97 ~ 2,~33.99: 9,~i6.0i 11,580.50 5,~i9.~0 21,602.38 25,397.62 0.00 35,000.00 3~,~2.~0! 2,858.0o 19,772.54i 0.~0 145,777.64 5,260.54 _~,772.70 24,4~2.~0_ .. 23,798.76 10,227.24 18,704.85 2,295. i5 9,227.80 ~72.20 2i,370.06 215,119.38 22,984.55 62,738.06 17,261.94 842.50 41,808.56 i9,~97.90 93,985.43 33,344.80 482,799.39 6,482.30 i32,686.09 11i760.19 5,92600 103,530.25 '~o,999.24 2,234.36 ' ~50,0oo.oo 4f6,699.46 20,264.00 1,o28,192.00 5,926.00 I 578,427.14 50,000I 170,254.831 89,897.65 52,500.00 0.00 ~,o-00,0o0.0o 0.72 74,200.00 ~5,0OO.oo 80,000.00 9,201.11 38,55o. O0 332,500.00 228,000.00 O.oo 446,593.19 66,929.57 i38,080.74! 184,500.00 6,722.46 222.36 85,050.00 0.00 50.00 4~9,Oo0.oO 65,ooo.0o 211,652.96 143,218.62 2,030.45 0.00 157,348.94 558,180.67 216,655.20 (12,099.93) 13,781.70 783,745.72 0.00 28,303.70 2,73800 29,939.73 fn:g:\finance\jessef19900audit.xls 2 of 4 8/17/00 9:43 AM Filename:g:tfinance~jessef19900audit\proj600.xls ..... DesCription Homestead/Tan\au TlS upgrade 280/W~olfe_ t~raffic safety improv. Wolfe Rd.arterial Phase iii i~td artffr!a_Lmgmt Stevens Canyon Landfill Stev. Cr_ee_k_S___pe_c_fi_c Pla_n_ ._ Creekside Park Li~)rary ~-)~3ansion Senior Center Expansion Four Season Comer Four Seaso? A~_S_c_ulp_k~_ _re. _. Blackberry Farm BBF master plan study Blue Pheasant ADA Sports Center ADA Sports Ctr.fitness expansion Total CIO enc I CIO budget 71,000 500,000 0 0 63,477.16 754 138,656 ~,400.00 45, i22 335,2i8.73 3,855,982 26,,~18.76 70,1~1 8,548.15 0.00 6130100 Adopted *YE.adj. 57,000 165,645 175,000 0 ~6,6o0 15,729 436,569 7,989,844 5,125,000 981,010.02 chang~ 300,0® i46,~99 ~4~,600 100,000 Tot~,!_B_Ud~e! t EncumbranCe[ Expenditu~'e . _71,000.00 ~,309.641 6,490.3(~ 500,000.00 16,030.24t i0,224.0131 300,000.00 '~46,699.00 0.00 64,231.16 138,656.00 52,522.00 18,624.36 ~i,~62.6~ 7,660.24 CurrentBal. 62,200.00 ~,006.~61 4~8,963.00 4,~76.00 285,000.00 26,4~6.82 10~,647.82 i0~,~.4i (i05,49~.41) 52,9i~.88 i56.28 5,553.23 133,102.77 33,8§1.~1 ib,98~.2~ 352,861.46 12,250.00 50,000.00 15,729.00 12,015.15 436,569.00 2,917,893 17,013,744.50 3,584,227.99 3,811,925.84 2,602.32 0.00 97,042.78 5,945.83 i,~6b.60 243,568.68 50,000.00 '~,729.00 3,467.O0 435,209.00 9,617,590.67 ~k RESOLUTION NO. 00-217 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN RECORDS (PLANNING AND BUILDING) WHEREAS, the City Council did by adoption of Resolution Nos. 8894 and 8930 establish rules and regulations for records retention and destruction; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that certain records in excess of two years old no longer contain data of any historical or administrative significance; and WHEREAS, the departmental request for permission to destroy all said records in excess of two years old has been approved by the City Clerk and the City Attorney pursuant to Resolution Nos. 8894 and 8930; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino authorizes destruction of the records specified in the schedule attached hereto. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st day of August, 2000, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino Contact the Clerk's office at 777-3223 if you have questions about retention periods. Microfilm Name Subject Address or Resolution, Date REQUIRED: number- (project name or (use permit, elections Location, if any Ordinance, or ranges (or M= microfilm Clerk's developer) documents, variance, etc.) application most D= destroy use only number recent or the month/year date) when records should be returned to you for review ,. REQUIRED ESO-Handyworker & 1992 D Home Access Cupertino 7/1/93- D Community Services 6/30/94 (CCS) - Affordable ..... Placement Program Cupertino 7/1/93- D ' Community Services 6/30/94 (CCS)- Cupertino/Sunnyvale Rotating Shelter Program ' Cupertino 1991-92 D Community Services (CCS) - Screening & Placement Services Cupertino 3/1/92- D :~ Community Services 6/30/93 (CCS) Employee MOU D t D' '0y33 Grantee Performance 1990-91 D Report Data Sheets GPR Data Sheets 1991.-92 D Grantee Performance FY 1990- D Report 91 HUD meetings 1991 D HUD Monitoring 1992 D Housing Authority 1991 D Senior Units Proposal HCD Accounting 1989 D Info Mortgage Credit 7/1/92- D Certificate (MCC) 6/30/93 Program MCC Program '//1/91- - D 6/30/92 National Association 1990 D of Housing & Re- development (NAHRO) - Officials NAHRO awards 1992 D National Affordable 1990 D Housing Act National Civic D League Awards National League of 1990 D Cities (NLC) Innovation NOFA - CDBG and D affordable housing t Destroy33 Outreach 1990 D Paragon Project - 1991 D Westwood Apts. Phase II Portofino 1991 D Development, Mariani Corp. Public relations 1990 D Quarterly reports - 1990 D County City of Santa Clara 10740 Randy D Police Department Lane Re-habilitation 1992 D program - housing quality standards checklist Rehab loans (HCD 1992 D reconciliations) Rental subsidy 1992 D program Rental housing 1991 D construction program (RHCP) Request for notice D Reverse annuity D mortgage (RAM) program Rotating shelter, CCS FY 1991- D San Jose Re- D D 'oy33 development agency Self-help/new D construction Senior and 1990 D handicapped housing fund committee Sr. home repair D programs Stem House, CCS 10390 Stem D Avenue John Stewart Co. D Second Harvest Food 1991-92 D Bank food distribution center Sunny View Lutheran D Home expansion plans Sunny View West 1990-91 D 16th Telephone D instructions CCS affordable 7/1/94- D placement program 6/30/95 CCS rotating shelter 7/1/94- D program 6/30/95 City/county contracts 1991-92 D 1992-93 D 1993-94 D Bay Area Council D housing and Destroy33 development newsbriefs AHC minutes and 11/92- D agendas 3/94 Housing mitigation D background info., v. 1 &2 Council committee's 1995-96 D CDBG and home funding recommendations Nexus consultant - D Planning Resource Assoc. Mortgage Credit 7/1/93- D Certificate Program 6/30/94 (MCC) CCS rotating shelter 6/1/95- D program 7/1/96 CCS screening and 6/1/95- D placement program 7/1/96 6/1/95- D 7/1/96 Dc "oy33 Contact the Clerk's office at 777-3223 if you have questions about retention periods. Microfilm Name Subject Address or Resolution, Date REQUIRED: number- (project name or (use permit, elections Location, if any Ordinance, or ranges (or M= microfilm Clerk's developer) documents, variance, etc.) application most D= destroy use only number recent or the month/year date) when records should be returned to you for review REQUIRED Box 3, February 24, 2000 BMR general D Mortgage credit D program BMR units location D and data BMR subcommittee 1984-85 D background file # 1 HBAC D Financing D mechanisms BMR Cupertino 20701 D village #2 resale CelesteCreek BMR units D Woodspring, Inc. BMR Units Portal D Plaza (C&H) Gardenview Terrace D BMR Rintala 10350 De Anza D Blvd. 2A BMR units Vista D Hills (Monta Vista Development Co., Terry Brown) BMR units Villa D Destroy34 Calabazas (Far West S&L) BMR housing D program BMR D BMR Cupertino D Village (John Vidovich) BMR units Pinn D Bros. BMR units D Wildflower Way property (Jules Duc) BMR units Town D Center condos (Jason Chartier, Cupertino Waterfall) BMR Units Vista D Hills townhomes BMR units (John D Vidovich( Town Center Mortgage revenue D bonds (Multi-family) Mortgage revenue D bonds (single-family programs) BMR D Community Housing D Developers 14~h year applicatoins D · SPARK & HIP 14~h year growth and D opportunity D Destroy34 Contact the Clerk's office at 777-3223 if you have questions about retention periods. Microfilm Name Subject Address or Resolution, Date REQUIRED: number- (project name or (use permit, elections Location, if any Ordinance, or ranges (or M= microfilm Clerk's developer) documents, variance, etc.) application most D= destroy use only number recent or the month/year date) when records should be returned to you for review REQUIRE ) Box 2, February 24, 2000, 1970-1995 SROs D Staffing D Statistics/census D Stocklmeir property D Subsidized units D . conversions Sunnyvale D application ~, Tax credits D Taxes/fees .. D Traffic D Training handouts D Tfi-county Apartment D Owenrs Association United Way D US Escrow contract D (original) ' Vallco D Volunteers D Terminated 1981 D Committee meetings D BMR subcommittee 1985 D .: :: BMR program- D ~ originals Destroy35 Miscellaneous city D council meeting minutes BMR - option to D purchase Housing authority - D costs BMR manual - D original Housing authority D Request for notice D BMR filings BMR subcommittee 1980-82 D Program origins " 1975-81 D ' Agreements D Reports D BMR subcommittee D background file//2 Housing element 1984-85 D ....... BMR subcommittee 1984-85 D Des~oy35 Contact the Clerk's office at 777-3223 if you have questions about retention periods. Microfilm Name Subject Address or Resolution, Date REQUIRED: number- (project name or (use permit, elections Location, if any Ordinance, or ranges (or M= microfilm Clerk's developer) documents, variance, etc.) application most D= destroy use only number recent or the month/year date) when records should be returned to you for review REQUIRED Box 4, February 24, 2000 12-U-84/7-TM-84 Olive Avenue D HW and Assoc. in lieu fee Adults Towards D Independent Living Proposal SPARK D Contracts -D CDBG 1974-80 D : "~: HUD (General 1976-83 D ' Monitoring) ' Housing publications D : Year/t12 CDBG 1986-87 D application and citizen participation : Housing re- D habilitation Employment D : information Budget 1976-83 D ~ Year #13 CDBG 1987-88 D application and citizen participation CDBG cities and D non-profit housing : groups Destroy36 MCFH D Non-profit D organizations Attachments D Forms D Code enforcement D report Common code D violations Code enforcement D 81,027 blight D ordinance Code enforcement D Policies, procedures D and rules CDBG Council of churches D Des~oy36 "Files to be Destroyed" Adorno, Zoe 10599 Johansen Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014-3527 Burris, Isabel 20696 Fargo Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 Butera, Vitale & Filomena 19703 La Mar Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 Campbell, Barbara 10605 Johansen Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 Cano, David & Judith 10697 Johansen Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 Cline, Larry 22460 Palm Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Couey, Glendora 7608 Waterford Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 Eliason, Cornelia 21583 Castleton St. Cupertino, CA 95014 Gallagher, Edward 859 Candlewood Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 Green, Dallas M. 1034 Cranberry Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 Griffin, Elayne 20818 Greenleaf Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 Gromi, Mary 10555 Merriman Rd. Cupertiri~, CA 95014 Haider, Farzilat 10653 Minette Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 Hastings, Delores 10711 Johnson Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Jordan-Slaugenhoup, Mary 10465 Moretti Dr. Cupertino, CA 950 ! 4-3673 Kennison, Margaret 18861 Loree Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Kiernan, Donna 19881 Pear Tree Ct. Cupertino, CA 95014 Krebs, Juliane 10348 Judy Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Kronquist, Belva D. 10366 Menhart Ln. Cupertino, CA 95014 Kury, Mike & Odette 10770 Minette Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 L~oni, John & Rose 10564 Gascoigne Dr. .Cupertino, CA 950 ! 4 Levens, Pamela & David 10351 Orange Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 "Files to be Destroyed" Lohr, Dorothy 10455 Corte de Seville Cupertino, CA 95014 Mantor, Dorothy 21950 McClellan Rd. Cupertino, CA 95014 Marcia, JoAnne 10310 Calvert Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 Mitchell, Ruby 10619 Farallone Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 Morash, Mary 10815 Peninsular Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Mullen, Eva 22645 San Juan Rd. Cupertino, CA 95014 Nelson, Elynor 10606 Gascoigne Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 Oren, Rosalie 10510 Tantau Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Phelps, Robert & Virginia 10741 Carver Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 Pickerrell, Debra 10839 Brookwell Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 Ranches, Fred & Carmen 19161 Anne Ln. Cupertino, CA 95014 Routh, Loretta 10601 Johnson Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Sardo, Maria 10386 San Fernando Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Schmidt, Arthur & Charlotte 21423 Shannon Ct. Cupertino, CA 95014 Shuster, Richard 777 Stendhal Ln. Cupertino, CA 95014 Smith, Barbara 20833 Greenleaf Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 Smith, Grace 1363 Judy Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Solorio, Mario & Cheryl 21856 HermOsa Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Spark Foundation 19681 Drake Dr. .Cupertino, CA 95014 Szczesny, Marianna 10303 Scenic Blvd. Cupertino, CA 95014 Thompson, Caroline 10850 Wunderlich D'r. Cupertino, CA 95014 Tonnesen, Joann 846 Miller Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 "Files to be Destroyed" Torres, Josefina & Jolm J~. 10181 Empire Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Verduyn, John 1114 Scotland Dr. Cupertino, CA 95014 Wathor, Josephine 10575 Sterling Blvd. Cupertino, CA 95014 Webster, Linda 10163 Judy Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Youngblood, Sheila 10536 Tantau Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Zeller, Heidi 19080 Meiggs Ln. Cupertino, CA 95014 Ziegler, William & Lucille 10411 Byrne Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Files to be Destroyed Minutes of 02 NOV 87 City Council Meeting (CC-730) Joint Powers Agreement Legal Le Beaulieu Licensing Land Use Committee Legislation Loan Committee Lump Sum Drawdown MCC & Housing Sheet MCC Marilyn's File i Memberships Peninsula Housing Minority Business i Mixed Use Monitoring Mobile Homes Maps (G.P. City) University Extension (UC Davis) McClellan Ranch McClellan Park Presentation Simms/McClellan Park Presentation McClellan Ranch (Park) McClellan Park Morgan Hill Re-hab Program NAHRO NIMBY Non-profit Non-profit Accounting NPH Occupancy Operation Sentinel Out to Bid Other City Projects Other Programs/Resources Planner Meetings P.A.C.T. Pictures Political Portland Political Activities-Prohibition Memo PR Advertising Re-hab Project Support Costs Pre-development Loan Fund Program Income Project Status-Sonia Proposition 77~84 Purchase Orclers Re-allocation Guidelines Re-development Regional Government'" Quota Club Re-hab Funding/CDBG Proposal Re-hah Sub-committee Rental Re-hah Rent Mediation Re-organization Reports-Miscellaneous Reports-Miscellaneous Residential Projects Resources Second Units Self-help Housing Sr. Citizens Housing Fund (income & expenditures) Sr. / H/C Hou .s{pg Committee Sr. Housing Fund Committee Srs. / H/C Housing Description SPARK Files to be Destroye~i-Box # 2 3ROs Staffing Statistics Census Stocklmeier Property Subsidized units Conversions Sunnyvale Application Tax Credits Taxes/Fees Traffic Training Handouts Tri-County Apt. Owners Assoc. United Way U.S. Escrow Contract (original) Vallco Volunteers Terminated 1981 Committee Mtgs. BMR Sub-committee 1985 BMR Program-Originals Misc. City Council Meeting Min. BMR-Option to Purchase Housing Authority-Costs BMR Manual-Original Housing Authority Request for Notice BMR Fillings BMR Sub-committee 1980-82 Program Origins 1975-81 Agreements Reports BMR Sub-committee Background 1984-85 File #2 Housing Element-City of Cupertino BMR Sub-committee 1984-85 Files to be Destroyed-Box #$ BMR General Mortgage Credit Program BMR Units-Location & Data BMR Sub-committee Background 1984-85 File #1 HBAC Financing Mechanisms BMR-Cupertino Village #2, 20701Celeste Cr., Re-sale BMR Units-Woodspring, Inc. BMR Units-Portal Plaza (C&H) BMR-Gardenview Terrace (Rintala), 10350 De Anza Blvd. 2A, Cupt. BMR Units-Vista Hills (Monta Vista Develop. Co.-Terry Brown) BMR Units-Villa Calabazas (Far West S & L) BMR Housing Program BMR BMR-Cupt. Village (John Viclovich) BMR Units-Pinn Bros. BMR Units-Wildflower Wy. Ppty. (Jules Duc) BMR Units-Town Center Condos (Jason Chartier-Cupt. Waterfall) BMR Units-Town Center, Cupt. Chateau (John Vidovich) BMR Units-Vista Hills Townhomes Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Multi-family) Mortgage Revenue Bonds (Single-family Program) BMR Comm. Housing Developers 14th Yr. Applications SPARK & HIP 14th Yr. Growth & Opportunity Monta Vista Street Improvements Contract (City/County) Background Monta Vista Street Improvements File #1 Files to be Destroyed-Box 12-U-84/7-TM-84 HW & Assoc. Inv., Olive Ave., BMR req. in lieu of fee Adults Toward Independent Living Proposal: SPARK Contracts Community Development Block Grant 1974-80 HUD (General Monitoring) 1976-83 Housing Publications Year # 12 1986-87 CDBG Application & Citizen Participation Housing Re-habilitation Employment Information Budget 1976-83 Year # 13 1987-88 Application & Citizen Participation CDBG Cities & Non-profit Housing Groups MCFH Non-profit Organizations Attachments Forms Code Enforcement Report Common Code Violations Code Enforcement 81,027-Blight Ordinance Code Enforcement 'Policies, Procedures, & Rules-CDBG :Council of Churches 10250 Scenic Blvd. 1997 D 21199 Orogrande 1997 D 10180 Prado Vista 1997 D 10199 Lockwood Drive 1997 D 10538 McClellan Place 1997 D 10329 Brittany Court 1997 D 10235 Byme 1997 D 10240 Phar Lap Drive 1997 D 10220 Peninsula 1997 D 110155 Western Drive 1997 D 10028 Peninsula 1997 D 22171 Wallace Drive 1997 D 21821 Oakview Lane 1997 D 22560 Poppy 1997 D 21629 Edward Way 1997 D 10171 Camino Vista 1997 D 19992 Rodrigues 1997 D 10475 Rampart 1997 D 20115 Chavoya Drive 1997 D 10623 Glenview 1997 D 21458 Meteor Drive 1997 D 7644 Rainbow 1997 D 1119 Elmsford 1997 D 1022 Cranberry 1997 D 10700 Stokes Avenue 1997 D 7712 Robindell Way 1997 D 7855 Creekline 1997 D 11566 Upland Way 1997 D 11545-71 Upland Way 1997 D 10545 Cordova 1997 D 5998 Sutton Park Place 1997 D 22363 Stevens Creek 1997 D Blvd. 21836 Monte Court 1997 D 10251 Prado Vista 1997 D Destroy37 Contact the Clerk's office at 777-3223 if you have questions about retention periods. Microfilm Name Subject Address or Location, if Resolutio Date REQUIRED: number- (project name or (use permit, elections any n, ranges (or M= microfilm Clerk's developer) documents, variance, etc.) Ordinanc most D= destroy use only e, or recent or the month/year applicatio date) when records n number should be returned to you for review REQUIRED Residential building permits 21667 Rainbow Drive 1998 D 11249 Redondo Court 1998 D 22156 Rae Lane 1998 D 20885 Alves 1998 D 21907 Almaden Court 1998 D 10375 Heney Creek 1998 D 10671 La Roda 1998 D 10671 Larry 1998 D 7925 Rainbow 1998 D 21855 Dolores 1998 D : 7853 Peach Blossom 1997 D 10075 Peninsula 1997 D ' ': ~ "~ 10769 Alderbrook Lane 1997 D 10081 Peninsula 1997 D 10036 Peninsula 1997 D 10290 Palo Vista 1997 D 21901 Dolores Avenue 1997 D 21561 Regnart Road 1997 D 22335 Regnart Road 1997 D Lot 3 on Price Avenue 1997 D 19868 Price Avenue 1997 D 1359 Primrose 1997 D ~, 10300 N. Portal Avenue 1997 D , 1327 Poppy Way 1997 D Destroy37 10142 N. Portal Avenue 1997 D 2101 Seven Springs 1997 D 19978 Rodrigues 1997 D 1369 S. Stelling Road 1997 D 22420 St. Andrews 1997 D 10208 Randy Lane 1997 D 10912 Leavesley Place 1997 D 7844 Jeanette Court 1997 D 20626 Kirwin 1997 D 22106 Linda Vista 1997 D 10526 Lonna Lane 1997 D 21747 McClellan 1997 D 10905 Mira Monte 1997 D 10638 Nathanson 1997 D 10389 Normandy Court 1997 D 10187 Myer Place 1997 D 1086 November Drive 1997 D 22638 Oak Crest 1997 D 10201 Hill Crest 1997 D 7650 Shadowhill 1997 D 7543 Fallen Leaf Lane 1997 D 19701 Auburn Court 1997 D 1358 S.. Stelling 1997 D 10074 Santa Clara 1997 D 1339 S. Stelling 1997 D 22639 San Juan Road 1997 D 11481 S. Stelling 1997 D 1144 S. Stelling 1997 D 706 Stendhal 1997 D 10396 Somerset Court 1997 D 11061 Santa Teresa 1997 D Drive 10480 S. Stelling 1997 D 10911 S. Stelling 1997 D 10386 S. Stelling Road 1997 D Des~oy37 1'0370 Plum Tree Lane 1997 D 10326 Plum Tree Lane 1997 D 10538 Phil Place 1997 D 10160 Camino Vista 1997 D 10411 Byme Avenue 1997 D 11300 Canyon View 1997 D Drive 10496 Byme Avenue 1997 D 10568 McClellan Place 1997 D 10211 Byme Avenue 1997 D 10329 Brittany 1997 D 10845 Baywood 1997 D 11101 Chadwick Place 1997 D 10045 Byme Avenue 1997 D 1192 Crestline Drive 1997 D 20615 Rodrigues Avenue 1997 D 1148 Charsan 1997 D 11570 Upland Way 1997 D 20685 Craig Court 1997 D 1472 Dumas 1997 D 20615 Rodrigues Avenue 1997 D "' 10238 E. Estates Drive 1997 D 29776, 77, 78 Parkside 1997 D 20885 Garden View 1997 D 20205 Apple Tree Lane 1997 D 21717 Rainbow 1997 D 10325 Tula 1997 D 7879 Creekline Drive 1997 D 10121 Linda Ann Place 1997 D 21886 Wilson Court 1997 D 22764 Majestic Oak Way 1997 D 22322 Bahl Drive 1997 D 22757 Stevens Creek 1997 D : Blvd. 10164 Carmen Road 1997 D Destroy37 10125 Carol Lee Drive 1997 D 19915 Fig Tree Court 1997 D 10120 Crescent Road 1997 D 0470 Glenview Avenue 1997 D 7423 Fallen Leaf 1997 D 10311 Cherry Tree Lane 1997 D 0039 Peninsula Avenue 1997 D 10925 Miramonte Road 1997 D 10385 Prune Tree 1997 D 10057 Peninsula Avenue 1997 D 10051 Peninsula Avenue 1997 D 0033 Peninsula Avenue 1997 D 10857 Barranca Drive 1997 D 10116 Crescent Court 1997 D 22131 Charsan Lane 1997 D 22036 Rae Lane 1997 D 10385 Prune Tree 1997 D 21121 Rainbow 1997 D 10555 Merriman Road 1997 D 22430 Cupertino Road 1997 D 10227 Adriana 1997 D 10591 La Roda 1997 D 10371 Mary Avenue 1997 D 7530 Waterford 1997 D 29530-29535 Rodfigues 1997 D 6 lots Des~oy37 CITY OF CUPEP INO City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino. CA 95014 (408) 777-3212 Fax: (408/777-3366 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM ~ER SUBJECT AND ISSUE 7 AGENDA DATE ~,~... ~/.,~2 ooo Application for Alcoholic Beverage License. BACKGROUND Name of Business: Location: Type of Business: Type of License: Reason for Application: Homestead FFC INC 20990 Homestead Road Delta Bowl (Bowling Alley) On-Sale General for Bona Fide Public Eating Place Person to Person Transfer RECOMMENDATION There are no use permit restrictions or zoning restrictions which would prohibit this use and staff has no objection to the issuance of the license. Prepared by: Submitted by: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner David Knapp, City Manager G:planning/mise/HomesteadFFC Printed on Recycled PaDer APPLICATION SIGNATURE SHEET I1. OWNERSHIP TYPE (C.~e¢~ =ne) · This form is to be used as the signature page for El SOLE OWNER applications not signed in the District Office. · Read instructions on reverse before completing.. ~ PARTNERSHIP · All signatures must be notarized in accordance with ~ PARTNERSHIP-LTD. laws of the State where signed. ~ CORPORATION ~3 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY El OTHER 2. FILE NUMBER M any) 3. LICENSE~PE , 4 TRANSAC~ON~PE tQ ORIGINAL 47 On Sale ' Gene~al Eati~ EXCHANGE Place | PERSON TO PERSON TRANSFER PREMISE TO PREMISE TRANSFER OTHER 5 APPLICANT(S) NAME .. HOMESTEAD FFC, INC. 6 APPLICANT'S MAILING ADDRESS (Street lOOress/P.O. Oox. c,ty. state, z= code) 20990 Homestead Road, Cupertino, CA 95014 7 PREMISES ADDRESS (Stree~ aclOress, c,ly. Z~D co¢le) 20990 Homestead Road, Cupertino, CA 95014 APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION Under penalty of perjury., eachperson whose si~,nature appears below, certifies and says: (I) He/She is an applica~nt, or one of the applicants, or an executive officer of the applicant corporation, named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf: (2) that he/she has read the foregoing and knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made are true: (3) that no person other than the applicant or applicants has an), direct or indirect interest in the apphcant or applicant's business to be conducted under the licensels) for which this application is made: (4) that the transfer application or proposed transfer is not made to (a) satisfy the payment of a loan or to fulfill an agreement entered into more than ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the transfer appli[:ation is filed with the Department. (b) to gain or establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor, or (c) to defraud or injure any creditor or transferor: {5) that the transfer application may be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licensee with no resulting liability to the Department. i understand that if I fail to qualify for the license or withdraw this application there will be a service charge of one-fourth of the license lee paid. up to $100. SOLE OWNER 8 PRINTED NAME (Last. hrst. m~;t(tlel ~xSIGNATURE~ DATE SIGNED PARTNERSHIP 9 PARTNER'S PRINTED NAME (Last. brat. m~aclle) ;GNATURE DATE SIGNED PARTNER'S PRINTED NAME (Last. brat. m~clle) ;GNATURE DATE SIGNED PARTNER'S PRINTED NAME (Last. brat. m~cl¢lle) ;GNATURE DATE SIGNED CORPORATION 10 PRINTED NAME (Last hfs!, m~'(l~e! Davito, Michael, C. TITLE ~ PRESIDENT PRINTED NAME (Last f,rst, m,cl01e) Davito, Michael, SIGNATURE $ .0 DATE SIGNED . ~ VICE PRESIDENT SIGNATURE I:~ CHAIRIVjAN OF THE BOARD DATE SIGNED TITLE ~1 SECRETARY ~3 ASST. SECRETARY ~3 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER [~ ASST. TREASURER LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 11. The limited liability company ia member-run ~3 Yes ~ No {If no, complete Item #12 below) 12. NAME OF DESIGNATED MANAGER. MANAGING MEMBER OR DESIGNATED OFFICER (Last, hrst m~lle) ABC INITIALS/DATE (ABC use 13. MEMBER'S PRINTED NAME (Last. brat. m~lclle) DATE SIGNED MEMBER'S PRINTED NAME (Last. hrst. rn~clla) ABC-211 SIG (12/981 I ;GNATURE GNATURE 7-3 DATE SIGNED State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control APPLICATION FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE(S) ABC 211 (6/99) TO: Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control 100 Pasco de San Antonio Room 119 San Jose. CA 95113 (408)277-1200 DISTRICT SERVING LOCATION: First Owner: Name of Business: SAN .lOSE HOMESTEAD FFC INC File Number: 367418 Receipt Number: 1287208 Geographical Code: 4303 Copies Mailed Date: Issued Date: 6-26-o0 Location of Business: County: Is premise inside city limits? Mailing Address: (If different from premises address) 20990 HOMESTEAD RD CUPERTINO, CA 95014 SANTA CLARA Type of license(s): 47 Transferor's license/name: '~96327 / r,lgtSERV, INC. Dropping Partner: Yes No License Type Transaction Typ~ Fee Type 47 ON-SALE GENERAL 1 PERSON TO PERSON TRANSF P40 47 ON-SALE GENERAL l ANNUAL FEE P40 47 ON-SALE GENERAL 1 STATE FINGERPRINTS NA 30 TEMPORARY PERMI DUPLICATE NA Master Y Y N N Dup 0 0 1 1 Date 06/26/00 06/26/00 06/26/00 06/26/00 Fee $1.250.00 $695.00 $39.00 $I00.00 Total $2,O84.00 Have you ever been convicted of a felony? No Have you ever violated any provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, or regulations of the Department pertaining to the Act? No Explain any "Yes" answer to the above questions on an attachment which shall be deemed part of this application. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager employed in an on-sale licensed premise will have all the qualifications of a licensee, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or permit to be violated any of the provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of SANTA CLARA Date: June 26, 2000 Under penalty of perjury, each person whose signature appears below, certifies and says: (I) He is an applicant, or one of the applicant~, or an executive officer of the applicant-corporation, named in the foregoing application, duly authorized to make this application on its behalf; (2) that he has read the foregoing nnd knows the contents thereof and that each of the above statements therein made nrc true; (3) that no person other thnn the applicant or applicants has any direct or indirect interest in the applicant or applicnnt's business to be conducted under the license{s) for which this application is made; (4) that the trensfer application or proposed transfer is not made to satisfy the payment of n Ionn or to fulfill an agreement entered into more thnn ninety (90) days preceding the day on which the trnnsfer application is filed with the Department or to gain or establish a preference to or for any creditor or transferor or to defraud or injure nny creditor of transferor;, (5) that the transfer application may be withdrawn by either the applicant or the licensee with no resulting liability 'to the Department. Applicant Name(s) Applicant Signature(s) HOMESTEAD FFC INC ~,~,~ ~1 1 ~ignntur~ Page Attachmem to Application Signature Sheet (ABC-211-SIG) NOTARY PUBLIC STATEMENT COUNTY OF LAKE STATE OF ILLINOIS I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on June 20, 2000 before the subscriber, Patricia S. Grass, a Notary Public of the State of Il!inois, Michael C. Dav;.to, Presidem and Secretary_ and Treasurer of Homestead FFC, Inc. ,.has sworn before me and executed the foregoing documem after stating to me that the statemems therein are tree to the best of their knowledge and belief. Witnessed my hand and official seal Expiration Date: 07-17-2000 (SEAL) CITY OF City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3223 FAX: (408) 777-3366 www.cupertmo.org OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK SUMMARY Agenda Item No. ~ Meeting Date: August 21, 2000 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Amendment to Hazardous Vegetation Management Program Fees for 2000-2001. BACKGROUND The Santa Clara County Fire Marshal's Office provides hazardous vegetation management services (weed abatement) to local jurisdictions in order to address the issue of public fire safety in a cost-effective manner. Beginning October 2000, the program fees will increase fi.om 140% to 150% of the actual weed abatement contract costs for each parcel abated. The proposed County administrative cost increase will be an average of $8.73 per parcel compared to last year's activity, and will cover the anticipated increases in program administration. There may be additional increases for abatement services passed on to the property owner depending on new contract to be negotiation between the County and Apple Tractor, but those would only be incurred if property owners do not provide their own weed abatement. The attached letter from the County of Santa Clara provides more details regarding the number of parcels, costs of abatement, and the proposed amendment to the contract. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt resolution amending the agreement between Santa Clara County and the City of Cupertino for the abatement of weeds. Submitted by: Kimberly Smi~'-3 City Clerk Approved for submission: David Knapp City Manager Printed on Recvcled PaDer County of Santa Clara Environlllcntal ReSOtlrces AgellC.V Fire Marshal's Office - Santa Clara C()unty Fire Departmen! C()tlnt.v G()vi_'rlllllt'llt (;('llt(_,r. East WJtlg 70 West Hedding Street. 7th Floor San Jose. CalilornJa 951 I O- 1705 t408) 299-3805 FAX 379-8537 July 10, 2000 Ms. Kimberly Smith City Clerk Department of Administration Services City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Re: Proposed Amendment to Adjust Hazardous Vegetation Management Program Fees - 2000/2001 Season Dear Ms. Smith: For the past twenty-one years, Santa Clara County has provided hazardous vegetation management services to local jurisdictions in order to address the issue of public fire safety in a cost effective manner. Currently, eleven jurisdictions have opted to partner with the County to provide timely weed and brush abatement services and thereby reduce the potential for fire danger in these communities. The economies of scale employed by this cooperative program and our efforts to keep administrative costs to a minimum have allowed us to continue to provide these services to your residents at minimal cost. We are committed to minimizing costs, but at the same time we must ensure cost recovery of the Hazardous Vegetation Management Program as directed by the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors. Beginning with the start of the 2000/2001 weed abatement season in October 2000, we propose to raise our Hazardous Vegetation Management Program fees from 140% to 150% of the actual weed abatement contract costs for each parcel abated. The proposed County administrative cost increase will equate to an average increase of only 4.17% or $8.73 per parcel in your jurisdiction compared to last year's activity. This increase will cover the dsing costs of Program administration anticipated for fiscal year 2000/2001. This increase is Board of Supervisors: Donald F. Gage. Blanca AlvaradO. Pete McHugh. James T. Beall Jr.. S. Joseph Simitian County Executive: Richard Wittenberg due primarily to negotiated labor union contract salary and benefit adjustments for staffing that are scheduled to be increased later this month. It should be noted, however, that the actual salary and benefit adjustments negotiated for this new fiscal year amount to an increase of approximately 7%. As stated earlier, the County is committed to only increasing the administrative fee to the level necessary for ensuring cost recovery based on the current level of projected abatement activity. Hence, the proposed adjustment is being capped at the effective 4.17% level. However, an unknown impact at this time is the actual new rates for the contract abatement services to be provided. The County's current contract with Apple Tractor will expire at the end of the current season in August. We are in the process of issuing a Request for Proposals for a new contract. Depending on the proposals received, there may be additional increases for abatement services that will be passed on to the property owner in accordance with the current contract requirements. In any case, the property owner would only incur costs if they choose not to maintain their property according to the minimum fire safety standards and the County then provides weed abatement services through its contractor. In keeping with the procedures of the current Program, if a property owner provides their own abatement, they are not assessed a fee for our inspection services. For your reference we have provided Attachment A, which summarizes the number of parcels inspected, number of parcels abated and the average cost per parcel, including Program fees for weed abatement services in your jurisdiction for 1996/97, 1997/98, and 1998/99. Attachment B provides an accounting of the Hazardous Vegetation Management Program on a countywide basis for the same period of time. Even with the proposed fee adjustment, we believe the benefits realized by the economies of scale still allow our services to be competitive. A proposed amendment to our agreement for weed abatement services is provided as Attachment C. Please let us know if we can provide any assistance as you carry the amendment forward to your City/Town Councils for approval. Considering our desire to provide uninterrupted service, we suggest the approval process by your Council and our Board of Supervisors be completed this summer. Please return a signed amendment to my attention by September 1, 2000. you do not wish to continue contracting with the County for weed abatement services, we would appreciate being notified of your decision no later than August 7, 2000 so that we may inform our Board of Supervisors and make any If 2 necessary adjustments to the Hazardous Vegetation Management Program. We anticipate our Board will take action on the amendments on August 29, 2000. If you have questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at (408) 299-3805 ext. 207. We thank you for your support and look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Senior Deputy Fire Marshal Attachments Attachment A: Attachment B: Attachment C: Jurisdictional Summary Countywide Summary Proposed Amendment to Agreement CC: Richard Wittenberg, County Executive Paul D. Romero, Acting Director, Environmental Resources Agency Peter Ng, Financial and Administrative Services Manager, ERA 3 Attachment A Jumidictional Summary Cupertino Parcels on Program Parcels Abated: State Board of Equalization (SBE) Private (Residential & Commemial) Total Average Cost Per Parcel Abated (incl Program Fee) State Board of Equalization (SBE) Private (Residential & Commercial) 1997 Season Actuals 332 2 $ 149.49 $ 162.46 1998 Season Actuals 364 0 28 28 $ 190.71 1999 Season Actuals 243 13 $ 1,843.02 $ 209.33 7/12/00 Hazardous Vegetation Inspection and Abatement Program Summary Financial Status FY1997/98 Actuals Through FY2000/01 Projected Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Expenditures: Staffing General Operation Support Interest Charges Subtotal Program Administration Contract Abatement Costs Total Expenditures Surplus (Deficit) Ending Fund Balance FY97 FY98 FY99 FY00 Actuals. Actuals Actuals Estimated ($53,449) ($57,866) ($53,840) ($3,702) $ 497,162 $ 379,315 $ 432,412 $ 399,500 (a) $ 180,607 $ 138,356 $ 128,236 $ 153,000 (b) $ 48,237 $ 23,350 $ 28,638 $ 29,000 (c) $ 20,412 $ 22,902 $ 19,038 $ 21,000 $ 249,256 $ 184,608 $ 175,912 $ 203,000 $ 252,323 $ 190,681 $ 206,362 $ 180,000 (d) $ 501,579 $ 375,289 $ 382,274 $ 383,000 ($4,417) $4,026 $50,138 $16,500 ($57,866) ($53,840) ($3,702) $12,798 FY01 w/increase Projected $12,798 $ 450,500 $ 198,000 $ 47,000 $ 22,000 $ 267,000 $ 195,000 $ 462,000 ($11,500 $1~298 Attachment B FY01 w/o increase Projected $12,798 $ 437,500 $ 198,000 $ 47,000 $ 22~000 $ 267,00O $ 195,000 $ 462,000 ($24,500) ($11,702) Notes (a) (b) (c) (d) Revenues calculated include different rates due to abatement seasons (December thru early August) overlapping across two fiscal years. FY98, FY99, & FY00 reflects significant staffing shodages of 1 to 2 positions throughout the year out of a total 4 positions budgeted for this program. As a result, staffing was below what was necessary to effectively administer the program. FY01 projections anticipate full staffing. Increases for FY01 primarily due to replacement of 13+ year old vehicle and upgrading computer needs. Decrease in abatement activity in the current FY00 primarily due to fewer State Board of Equalization (SBE) parcels requiring abalement. 7/11/00 ATTACHMENT C PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT ~7 SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SANTA CLARA COUNTY AND THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR ABATEMENT OF WEEDS The Agreement for the Abatement of Weeds (Agreement) between the County of Santa Clare (County) and the City of Cupertino (City) previously entered into on March 1, 1976, as amended on May 4, 1981, February 15, 1983, January 14, 1996, August 18, 1998, and September 7,1999 is hereby amended to increase the charge for the County's program costs to administer the Hazardous Vegetation Management Program. IT IS AGREED between the parties as follows: 1. Statement of Costs Section 6. of the Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: County shall render to City an itemized statement or report of the cost of the weed abatement services performed for the respective parcels of land in the City on or before the 10th day of August of each year. Commencing with the Year 2000/2001 weed abatement season, the County's administrative costs shall be 150% of the cost of the weed abatement contractor for the respective parcels for which services were performed. The statement shall include the description of the lots and parcels of land for which services were performed, and verification by signature of the County official administering the Hazardous Vegetation Management Program. 2. Except as modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain the same. SANTA CLARA COUNTY CITY OF CUPERTINO Paul D. Romero, Acting Director Environmental Resources Agency John Statton, Mayor August 29, 2000 Date Approved a%to form and~,gality: Kr.-t[-hm~,~,..,( ,~ - ..... Kathy Deputy Co~nty Counsel - RESOLUTION NO. 00-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN SANTA CLARA COUNTY AND THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR ABATEMENT OF WEEDS WHEREAS, there has been presented to the City Council a proposed Sixth Amendment to the Agreement between Santa Clara County and the City of Cupertino for the abatement of weeds; and WHEREAS, the terms, conditions and provisions of the agreement have been reviewed and approved by the Director of Administrative Services and the City Attorney. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino hereby approves the aforementioned agreement and authorizes the Mayor to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Cupertino. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st day of August 2000, by the.following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino CITY OF CUPE INO City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3405 FAX: (408) 777-3401 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM NO. ~] MEETING DATE: August 21, 2000 SUBJECT Amending the Conflict of Interest Code of the City of Cupertino for Officials and Designated Employees BACKGROUND The Political Reform Act requires that every agency review their Conflict of Interest Code and report to the city council by October 1 of every even-numbered year. Attached to the resolution is an amended list of designated employees and officials who are required to file Statements of Economic Interest (Form 700). STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution rescinding Resolution No. 98-033 and adopting an amended Conflict of Interest Code. Submitted by: Ki~it~ Clerk - City Clerk Approved for submission to the City Council David Knapp City Manager %/ Prfnted on Flecvcled Paoer' RESOLUTION NO. 00-219 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 98-033 AND ADOPTING THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR OFFICIALS AND DESIGNATED EMPLOYEES RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cupertino as follows: 1. Amendment and Repeal That the Code entitled, "Conflict of Interest Code of the City of Cupertino for Officials and Designated Employees" is hereby amended, approved, and adopted as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. It is further resolved that Resolution 98-033 is hereby rescinded. 2. Effective Date The effective date of the amendments to this Code shall be thirty (30) days a~er adoption of this resolution by the City Council. 3. Filing of Resolution The Clerk is hereby directed to file a copy of this resolution with her office and to make it available to members of the general public. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st day of August, 2000, by the following vote. Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino Resolution No. 00-219 Page 2 EXHIBIT A CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR OFFICIALS AND DESIGNATED EMPLOYEES The Political Reform Act, Government Code Section 81000, et seq., requires state and local government agencies to adopt and promulgate conflict of interest codes. The Fair Political Practices Commission has adopted a regulation, 2 Cal. Code of Regs. Section 18730, which contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code. It can be incorporated by reference and may be amended by the Fair Political Practices Commission after public notice and hearings to conform to amendments to the Political Reform Act. Therefore, the terms of 2 Cal. Code of Regs. Section 18730 and any amendments to it duly adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission are hereby incorporated by reference and, along with attached Appendix in which members and employees are designated and disclosure categories are set forth, constitutes the conflict of interest code of the City of Cupertino. Designated employees shall file statements of economic interests (Form 700) with the City Clerk who will make the statement available for public inspection and reproduction. (Gov. Code Section 81008). Upon receipt of the statements of the City of Cupertino City Council and City Manager (Form 700), the agency shall make and retain a copy and forward the original of these statements to the Fair Political Practices Commission. Statement for all other designated employees will be retained by the City Clerk. It has been determined that the positions listed below manage public investments and will file a statement of economic interests (Form 700) pursuant to Government Code Section 87200: City Treasurer Deputy City Treasurer Resolution No. 00-219 Page 3 APPENDIX A DESIGNATED POSITIONS AND APPLICABLE REPORTABLE INTEREST CATEGORIES The following positions shall report all applicable interests in categories A-1 through F: DESIGNATED POSITIONS Commissions Cupertino Housing Committee Members Cupertino Telecommunications Commission Members Fine Arts Commission Members Parks and Recreation Commission Members Redevelopment Agency Employees Assistant City Attorney Assistant Civil Engineer Associate Planner Building Inspection I Building Inspection II Building Official City Clerk City Planner Code Enforcement Officer Deputy City Attorney Deputy City Clerk Director of Community Development Director of Parks and Recreation Director of Public Works - City Engineer Electrical Inspector Engineering Technician Environmental Programs Manager Facility Projects Manager Human Resources Manager Information Technology Manager Planner I Planner II Public Information Officer Public Works Inspector Public Works Project Manager Public Works Supervisor Recreation Supervisor Senior Building Inspector Senior Engineering Technician Senior Traffic Technician Traffic Engineer Consultants** The City Manager may determine in writing that a particular consultant, although a "designated position", is hired to perform a range of duties that is limited in scope and thus is not required to fully comply with the disclosure requirements in this section. Such written determination shall include a description of the consultant's duties and, based upon that description, a statement of the extent of disclosure requirements. The City Manager's determination is a public record and shall be retained for public inspection in the same manner and location as this conflict of interest code. CITY OF CUPEPxTINO City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-32110 FAX: (408) 777-3366 Website: w~rw.cuperfino,org PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT SUMMARY Agenda Item Number Agenda Date: August 21, 2000 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Request fi.om the Cupertino Host Lions Club for waiver of use fees for two annual fund raising events held at Blackberry Farm and the Quinlan Community Center. BACKGROUND Cupertino Host Lions Club has two fund raising events planned to help support charitable and youth- related activities. The Corn Feed is planned for Thursday, August 17, 2000, at Blackberry Farm, and the 50th Anniversary Club Diner will be on Sunday, September 17, 2000, at the Quinlan Community Center. The Cupertino Host Lions Club is requesting waiver of use fees. Council has traditionally waived the use fees. STAFF RECOMMENDATION City Council waive use fees in the approximate amount of $350.00 for the Cupertino Host Lions Club 50'h Anniversary Club Dinner and $1,875.00 for the Corn Feed. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED FOR SUBMISSION TO CITY COUNCIL: Mike O'Dowd, Recreation Supervisor David W. Knapp, City Manager mp Printed on Recycled Pal)er CU?ERTII IO HO,ST UOl,l,S CLUB CHAR, ITIES POST OFFICE BOX 640_ CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 9501,~ (40-31 E171-7720 FOUNDATION, Ii'lC, FEDERAL TAX ID 77-03;J6254 [501lC] (3] July 24, 2000 Pam Eggen City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation Department Dear Pam, Per our convemation today the Cupertino Host Lions Club is asking the City Of Cupertino to waive the use fees for our fundraising event at Quinlan Center on September 17, 2000. If you have any questions, please call me at 408-253-2512. ~r~lv~ - - ~Preeident, Cupertino Host Uons Club CUPERTIJ"IO J-lOB'l' .~lOl',l,S CLUB CHARITIES FOUI',IDATIOi',I, Il,lC, POST '"'"'"' CUP~RTII~O, C. ALI~OR~IA 14o~1 FEDERAL TAX. ID 77-0336254 lS01lC) 131 July 24, 2000 Pam Eggen City of Cupertino Parks and Recreation Department Dear Pam, . Per our conversation today the Cupertino Host Lions Club is asking the City Of Cupertino to waive the use fees for our fundraising event at Blackberry Farm on August 17, 2000. If you have any questions, please call me at 408-253-2512. (//("--~Jo~Ko~i ~~,.._..trresident, ,Cupe:o Host Uons Club CITY OF CUPE INO Cit~ Hall 10300 Tone Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-32S$ Fax: (40g) 777-3109 CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION STAFF REPORT City Council Agenga Item No. Meeting Date: Aug. 21, 2000 Staff Report From Alex Wykoff, Code Enforcement Division Re: The William & Elena Kettler property located at 7535 Normandy Way, Cupertino. APN: 366-11-151 SUBJECT AND ISSUE On May 16, 2000 a complaint was made to the Code Enforcement Division regarding the property located at 7535 Normandy Way, Cupertino. The reporting party was concerned with following issue: 1) Overgrown foliage that is obstructing the sidewalk. Subsequently, a site inspection of the property was conducted. I observed the following violations on the property that were in plain view of the public right-of-way: 1) Overgrown juniper bushes and ivy that are overgrown obstructing approximately 50% of the sidewalk. 2) Low hanging pine tree branches that are approximately 5' above the sidewalk. 3) An unregistered, * inoperable, vehicle parked in the front driveway, not completely on a paved surface. (* Note- I was advised by Mrs. Kettler this vehicle was not operable). 4) A utility trailer in the front yard was not parked on a paved surface. 5) An automobile engine, appliance, scrap materials, and other miscellaneous junk and debris was being stored in the front yard and driveway area. 6) Loose litter and trash in the ivy located within the planting strip. This office has written three letters and made several personal contacts with the property owner (Mrs. Kettler) in an effort to have the violations corrected. All letters were mailed /I-I Printed on Recycled Paoer 7535 Normandy Way, Staff Report Page 2 via certified mail and the remm receipts were received indicating that the property owner has received the notifications. Mrs. Kettler deferred discussions of this issue to her husband. I left two business cards with Mrs. Kettler, requesting her husband call me to discuss the case. On June 22, 2000 at 1:15 p.m. I received a voicemail from Mr. Kettler, expressing his frustration regarding the case, however no telephone number was provided for a call back. I received the message on that date at approximately 3:00 p.m. at which time I immediately drove to the residence to contact Mr. Kettler in person. I was advised by his wife that he was in Fresno, CA and that he spends several days per week in Fresno managing property that they own. A final site inspection of the property was conducted on July 10, 2000. The following conditions were noted in that inspection: 1) Approximately 20' of ivy that was obstructing the gutter was trimmed. No other foliage had been cut back. 2) The reported inoperative, unregistered vehicle was removed from the property. A new vehicle was parked in it's place that is currently registered and operable per Mrs. Kettler. My observations of the vehicle conclude that it is indeed operable. 3) The appliance in the front yard had been moved to another location in the front yard, still in-plain view, and was partially covered with a tarp. 4) Some of the debris was removed from the driveway. CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS May 16, 2000: Complaint received via anonymous voice mail to the Code Enforcement Office. Two other properties were also reported as having overgrown foliage that was obstructing the sidewalk. May 17, 2000: Site inspection of the property. Contacted Mrs. Kettler at the property to discuss the situation. Violation letter drafted and mailed via certified mail to the property owner. (Exhibit A). May 30, 2000: Conducted a brief drive-by inspection of the property. No observable change in conditions. No communication received from the property owner. June 5, 2000: Certified mail return receipt for the first violation letter was received back. June 6, 2000: Conducted a site inspection of the property. No observable change in conditions. Contacted Mrs. Kettler who acknowledged her husband had received the 11-4 7535 Normandy Way, Staff Report Page 3 violation notice. A second,violation letter was drafted and mailed via certified mail to the property owner. (Exhibit B). June 12, 2000: Certified mail return receipt for the second violation letter was received back. June 19, 2000: Conducted a third site inspection. Observed that approximately 20' of ivy was cut back. No other observable progress was made. No contact has been received from the property owner to discuss the case. June 20, 2000: Third and final violation letter was drafted and mailed via certified mail. (Exhibit C). June 21, 2000: Certified mail remm receipt for the third violation letter was received back. June 22, 2000: Received a voicemail from Mr. Kettler expressing frustration regarding the violations, however, no call back number was provided. I immediately responded in person to the residence to discuss, however I was advised that he was out of the area for several days. Left a business card with Mrs. Kettler requesting another telephone call and a contact phone number. No call was ever received as of July 14, 2000. July 10, 2000: Conducted a final site inspection of the property. Some change has occurred, however not all violations were corrected. Mrs. Kettler was again requested to have her husband call me to discuss resolution of the issues. She was advised that unless communication was received indicating an interest in compliance, nuisance abatement proceedings would begin. July 14, 2000: To this date, no communication has been received. Staff report for the case was prepared and forwarded to the Code Enfomement supervisor for review. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the property be declared a public nuisance. Request the City Attorney obtain an abatement warrant for coordination of removal of debris constituting a violation. Coordination with the Department of Public Works for removal of all foliage that is obstructing the right-of-way. 7535 Normandy Way Page 4 Submission of all staff costs of investigation and abatement to the Finance Division for billing. Submitted by: Alex Wykoff ~ ~} ~/ Code Enforcement Officer Approved by: David Knapp City Manager RESOLUTION NO. 00-220 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DECLARING INTENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING A NUISANCE ON PARCEL 366-11-151, 7535 NORMANDY WAY, OVERGROWN FOLIAGE OBSTRUCTING THE SIDEWALK AND STREET, AN APPLIANCE, BROKEN EQUIPMENT, AND LITTER IN THE FRONT YARD AND DRIVEWAY WHEREAS, Section 1.09.03A of the Cupertino Municipal Code defines a nuisance as anything which is declared by the City Council to be or likely to become injurious to the senses, or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or Property; and WHEREAS, there exists overgrown foliage obstructing the sidewalk and street, an appliance, broken equipment, and litter in the fi:ont yard and driveway on parcel 366-11-151; and WHEREAS, as provided by Ordinance No. 794, the City Council shall hold a public hearing to determine whether or not said condition constitutes a public nuisance and, if said determination is made, the City Council shall require abatement of said public nuisance by immediate removal of all overgrown foliage, appliances/broken equipment, and litter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino does, upon adoption of this resolution, establish the date of September 18, 2000, 6:45 p.m., as the time and 10300 Tone Avenue, Cupertino, California as the place wherein public testimony will be taken relative to the determination as to whether or not a public nuisance exists and if so determined, what type of abatement is necessary. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st day of August, 2000 by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino CITY OF City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3220 Fax: (408) 777-3366 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUMMARY Agenda Item No. lO,. SUBJECT AND ISSUE Meeting Date: August 21, 2000 Leadership Cupertino/Tomorrow's Leaders Today - Agreement between sponsors to share equally in liability. BACKGROUND Leadership Cupertino is an ongoing program in its fourth consecutive year, which teaches adults about government, quasi-government and not-for-profit organizations in Cupertino. Tomorrow's Leaders Today was started in September 1999 to similarly educate high school sophomores and juniors. The goal of these programs is to encourage future involvement by our citizens in our council, board, and commission seats. The Sponsors of Leadership Cupertino and Tomorrow's Leaders today are the Chamber of Commerce, DeAnza/Foothill College, UCSC and the City. Although no litigation has occurred or is currently pending, our steering committee decided to formalize our verbal agreement for cost sharing of liability coverage. The Sponsors have mutually agreed to require that the executive directors carry two million dollars of professional liability insurance and to equally share all settlement costs over this insurance. The attached agreements set forth these intentions. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the independent contractors and sponsor agreements. Submitted by: Carol A. Atwood Director of Administrative Services Approved for submission: David Knapp City Manager Pdnted on Flecvcled Paper AGREEMENT BETWEEN AND AMONG THE CITY OF CUPERTINO, THE CUPERTINO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ AND FOOTHILL DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT SPONSORING THE OPERATION OF LEADERSHIP CUPERTINO AND TOMORROW'S LEADERS TODAY This Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement") is made and entered into as of July 1, 2000, (hereinafter "Effective Date") between and among the City of Cupertino, a California municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), the Cupertino Chamber of Commerce, a non- profit corporation organized under the laws of the state of California (hereinafter the "Chamber"), the University of California, Santa Cruz (hereinafter "UCSC") and the Foothill- DeAnza Community College District (hereinafter the "District"). The parties may also be referred to collectively as "The Sponsors." Recitals This Agreement is made with reference to the following: 1. Effective September 1997, the City, Chamber, and the District entered into an informal agreement to sponsor "Leadership Cupertino" (hereinafter "LC"), a ten-month course to introduce citizens to government, quasi-government and not-for-profit organizations with the purpose of encouraging and educating citizen involvement in local political issues. 2. In 1999, UCSC joined as a 4th sponsor and another program was added for youthful participants entitled "Tomorrow's Leaders Today" (hereinafter "TLT"). 3. All four sponsors support the programs through cash contributions and in-kind services. Administrative services for the programs are performed by the City. 4. Each program is administered by a paid executive director who works as an independent contractor. Payments to the executive directors are advanced by the City. The City is reimbursed for these costs by the Sponsors and other program revenues. 5. The overall supervision of both programs is accomplished by a "Steering Committee" consisting of one or more representatives from each of the sponsors. NOW, THEREFORE, in ,consideration of the covenants and conditions herein contained, the Sponsors agree as follows: pc/dir/l/la.l(166)2-28-00 1 ~/~a-,~ 1. Term and Termination a) This Agreement shall commence as of the effective date and shall continue thereafter for a period of one year unless earlier terminated in accordance with this Agreement; provided, however, that this Agreement shall be automatically extended for successive periods of one year unless a Sponsor shall have provided written notice of non- renewal to other Sponsors no later than sixty (60) days prior to the end of the one year period. b) This Agreement may be terminated early by a simple majority vote of the entire Steering Committee, or in the event that funds derived from all sources of revenue are insufficient to fund either or both programs. 2. Budgets Prior to the end of the City's fiscal year, the City shall submit to the Sponsor a proposed budget, m substantially the same form as the 2000-2001 budget, a copy of which is attached hereto. The Sponsors shall be responsible for approving an annual budget for every year of operation of the program or programs. 3. Level of Contributions The Sponsors will provide cash and m-kind contributions for ten (10) month LC and TLT programs. The level of cash and m-kind contributions shall be determined by the Steering Committee on an annual basis after the annual budget is approved. 4. Payments to Executive Directors The City will advance sums necessary to pay the executive directors of the programs. The City will reimburse itself for these costs from the cash contributions of the Sponsors, tuition payments, and donations. 5. Executive Directors - Independent Contractors It is understood that the Executive Directors of the LC and TLT programs shall at all times act as independent contractors of the Sponsors and shall not be considered employees of any of the Sponsors. The contracts for said Executive Directors shall be in writing and shall conform to the sample contract attached hereto. pc/dir/lna. 1(166)2-28-00 2 /~ - .3 6. Executive Director - Indemnity and Insurance Any written agreement for the services of an Executive Director shall contain a provision in which the Sponsors and the Executive Director indemnify, defend, and hold harmless each other for the acts and omissions of the other. Said written agreement shall also contain a provision requiring each Executive Director to maintain professional liability insurance coverage with a responsible insurance carrier approved by the Sponsors, in an amount of no less than $2,000,000. Said policy shall name the Sponsors as additional insureds. 7. Claims and Litigation - Allocation of Obligations In the event that any claim, demand, action, suit, or proceeding of each and every kind is brought by any party who is not a Sponsor arising out of the operation of the LC and/or TLT programs, the City will undertake the defense of the same on behalf of all Sponsors. At the conclusion of each such proceeding above described, the Sponsors shall forthwith reimburse on an equal basis the City for all losses which are not covered by the insurance policy described in Paragraph 6 above, including the deductible amount of the policy. 8. Compliance with Laws All Sponsors shall observe and comply with all valid laws, ordinances, statutes, orders and regulations now or hereafter made or issued respecting this Agreement by any federal, state, county, local or other government agency or entity having jurisdiction thereof. 9. Notices Any notice, request, demand or other communication provided for hereunder shall be in writing and delivered in person or sent by First Class mail, facsimile or overnight delivery and addressed as follows: City: Director of Administrative Services City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Facsimile (408) 777-3366 Chamber: Executive Director Cupertino Chamber of Commerce 20455 Silverado Ave. Cupertino, CA 95014 Facsimile (408) 252-0638 District: DeAnza College 21250 Stevens Creek Blvd. Cupertino, CA 95014 Facsimile (408) 864-8603 UCSC: Marketing Director University of California, Santa Cruz 10420 Bubb Road Cupertino, CA 95014 Facsimile (408) 342-0164 pc/dir/l/la. 1 ( 166)2-28-00 3 ! ~ ' ~/ Any Sponsor may change its address for receipt of notices under this Agreement by notice given in the manner provided herein. 10. Amendments This Agreement represents the entire understanding and expression of the Sponsors' Agreement as to those matters contained herein, and supersedes all other oral or written agreements with respect to such matters. This Agreement may be modified only by a written amendment duly executed by the Sponsors. 11. No Third Party Beneficiary This Agreement shall not be construed or deemed to be an agreement for the benefit of any third party or parties. No third party or parties shall have the claim or right of action under this Agreement for any cause whatsoever. The Sponsors acknowledge and accept the terms and conditions of this Agreement as evidenced by the following signatures of their duly authorized representatives. It is the intent of the Sponsors that this Agreement shall become effective as of July 1, 2000. Approved as to Form: City of Cupertino Charles T. Kilian, City Attorney University of California, Santa Cruz Mayor, City of Cupertino Attest: City Clerk Foothill-DeAnza Community College District By Dean Cupertino Chamber of Commerce By: Vice Chancellor By: President By President pc/dir/I/la. 1 ( i 66)2-28-00 4 CONTRACT FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR LEADERSHIP CUPERTINO THIS CONTRACT is entered into on July 1, 2000, by and between the City of Cupertino, a California municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), the Cupertino Chamber of Commerce, a non-profit corporation organized under the laws of the state of California (hereinafter the "Chamber"), the University of California, Santa Cruz (hereinafter "UCSC"), the Foothill-DeAnza Community College District (hereinafter the "District"); the parties may also be referred to collectively as "The Sponsors", and Darryt Stow, hereinafter called "Consultant". WHEREAS, the SPONSORS are in need of an executive director, and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified to perform the director's services for the SPONSORS. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein, the parties hereto COVENANT, PROMISE and AGREE as follows: 1. CONSULTANT shall perform the director services for the SPONSORS as set forth in the attached description of said Office. It is understood and the parties intend that the services described herein shall be provided on an annual basis for the ten (10) month program. 2. CITY shall compensate CONSULTANT at the rate of seven hundred and fifty dollars ($750.00) per mOnth for all work described herein plus the cost of maintenance, two million dollars ($2,000,000) for professional liability insurance. 3. This contract shall commence on July 1, 2000, and shall continue in full force and effect until June 30, 2001. 4. This contract may be terminated prior to the automatic termination date set forth above as follows: A. By mutual consent of the parties; or B. By either party on delivery of written notice thereof to the other party with or without cause and for any reason, whatsoever. CONTRACT FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - LEADERSHIP CUPERTINO Page 2 5. If this contract is terminated under the provisions of Paragraph 4, CONSULTANT shall be compensated only for the months worked and expenses incurred prior to the effective date of termination. 6. The parties hereto agree and understand that this is a contract for professional services and shall not be assigned by either party in any manner. As such, it is understood that CONSULTANT is an independent contractor and not an employee of the SPONSORS. However, SPONSORS and the CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless each other for the acts and omissions of the other. 7. This contract may only be modified by a written amendment hereto, executed by both parties. 8. In the performance of the work authorized under this contract, CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against anyone because of race, creed, color, ancestry, religion, marital status, medical condition, age (over 40), physical or mental handicaps, veteran or non-veteran status, sex, or national origin. 9. This contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. It constitutes the entire agreement between the parties regarding its subject matter. This contract supersedes all contracts, proposals, oral and written, and all negotiations, conversations or discussions heretofore and between the parties related to the subject matter of the contract. EXECUTED at Cupertino, California, on the day and year first written above. CONTRACT FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - LEADERSHIP CUPERTINO Page 3 Approved as to Form: City of Cupertino Charles T. Kilian, City Attorney University of California, Santa Cruz Mayor, City of Cupertino Attest: City Clerk Foothill-DeAnza Community College District By. By: Vice Chancellor By: President Cupertino Chamber of Commerce By: Presidem CONTRACT FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TOMORROW'S LEADERS TODAY THIS CONTRACT is entered into on July 1, 2000, by and between the City. of Cupertino, a California municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), the Cupertino Chamber of Commerce, a non-profit corporation organized under the laws of the state of California (hereinafter the "Chamber"), the University of California, Santa Cruz (hereinafter "UCSC"), the Foothill-DeAnza Community College District (hereinafter the "District"); the parties may also be referred to collectively as "The Sponsors", and Barbara Nunes, hereinafter called "Consultant". WHEREAS, the SPONSORS are in need of an execmive director, and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified to perform the director's services for the SPONSORS. NOW, COVENANT, 1. THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein, the parties hereto PROMISE and AGREE as follows: CONSULTANT shall perform the director services for the SPONSORS as set forth in the attached description of said' Office. It is understood and the parties intend that the services described herein shall be provided on an annual basis for the ten (10) month program. CITY shall compensate CONSULTANT at the rate of three hundred seventy five dollars ($375.00) per month for all work described herein plus the cost of maintenance, two million dollars ($2,000,000) for professional liability insurance. This contract shall commence on July 1, 2000, and shall continue in full force and effect until June 30, 2001. This contract may be terminated prior to the automatic termination date set forth above as follows: A. By mutual consent of the parties; or B. By either party on delivery of written notice thereof to the other party with or without cause and for any reason, whatsoever. CONTRACT FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - TOMORROW'S LEADERS TODAY Page 2 5. If this contract is terminated under the provisions of Paragraph 4. CONSULTANT shall be compensated only for the months worked and expenses incurred prior to the effective date of termination. 6. The parties hereto agree and understand that this is a contract for professional services and shall not be assigned by either party in any manner. As such, it is understood that CONSULTANT is an independent contractor and not an employee of the SPONSORS. However, SPONSORS and the CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless each other for the acts and omissions of the other. 7. This contract may only be modified by a written amendment hereto, executed by both parties. 8. In the performance of the work authorized under this contract, CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against anyone because of race, creed, color, ancestry, religion, marital status, medical condition, age (over 40), physical or mental handicaps, veteran or non-veteran status, sex, or national origin. 9. This contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. It constitutes the entire agreement between the parties regarding its subject matter. This contract supersedes all contracts, proposals, oral and written, and all negotiations, conversations or discussions heretofore and between the parties related to the subject matter of the contract. EXECUTED at Cupertino, California, on the day and year first written above. CONTRACT FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - TOMORROW'S LEADERS TODAY Page 3 Approved as to Form: City of Cupertino Charles T. ,I~ilian, City Attorney University of California, Santa Cruz By. Dean Cupertino Chamber of Commerce By: President Mayor, City of Cupertino Attest: City Clerk Foothill-DeAnza Community College Disl~ict By: Vice Chancellor By: President CONTRACT FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TOMORROW'S LEADERS TODAY THIS CONTRACT is entered into on July 1, 2000, by and between the City of Cupertino, a California municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City"), the Cupertino Chamber of Commerce, a non-profit corporation organized under the laws of the state of California (hereinafter the "Chamber"), the University of California, Santa Cruz (hereinafter "UCSC"), the Foothill-DeAnza Community College District (hereinafter the "District"); the parties may also be referred to collectively as "The Sponsors", and Gail Jensen, hereinafter called "Consultant". WHEREAS, the SPONSORS are in need of an execmive director, and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT is qualified to perform the director's services for the SPONSORS. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein, the parties hereto COVENANT, PROMISE and AGREE as follows: 1. CONSULTANT shall perform the director services for the SPONSORS as set forth in the attached description of said Office. It is understood and the parties intend that the services described herein shall be provided on an annual basis for the ten (10) month program. 2. CITY shall compensate CONSULTANT at the rote of three hundred seventy five dollars ($375.00) per month for all work described herein plus the cost of maintenance, two million dollars ($2,000,000) for professional liability insurance. 3. This contract shall commence on July 1, 2000, and shall cominue in full force and effect until June 30, 2001. 4. This contract may be terminated prior to the automatic termination date set forth above as follows: A. By mutual consent of the parties; or B. By either party on delivery of written notice thereof to the other party with or without cause and for any mason, whatsoever. CONTRACT FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - TOMORROW'S LEADERS TODAY Page 2 5. If this contract is terminated under the provisions of Paragraph 4, CONSULTANT shall be compensated only for the months worked and expenses incurred prior to the effective date of termination. 6. The parties hereto agree and understand that this is a contract for professional services and shall not be assigned by either party in any manner. As such. it is understood that CONSULTANT is an independent contractor and not an employee of the SPONSORS. However, SPONSORS and the CONSULTANT shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless each other for the acts and omissions of the other. 7. This contract may only be modified by a written amendment hereto, executed by both parties. 8. In the performance of the work authorized under this contract, CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against anyone because of race, creed, color, ancestry, religion, marital status, medical condition, age (over 40), physical or mental handicaps, veteran or non-veteran status, sex, or national origin. 9. This contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. It constitutes the entire agreement between the parties regarding its subject matter. This contract supersedes all contracts, proposals, oral and written, and all negotiations, conversations or discussions heretofore and between the parties related to the subject matter of the contract. EXECUTED at Cupertino, California, on the day and year first written above. CONTRACT FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - TOMORROW'S LEADERS TODAY Page 3 Approved as to Form: City of Cupertino Charles T. Kilian, City Attorney University of California, Santa Cruz By. De~ffl Mayor, City of Cupertino Attest: City Clerk Foothill-DeAnza Community College District By: Vice Chancellor By: President Cupertino Chamber of Commerce By: President Gail Jensen RESOLUTION NO. 00-221 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 SENIOR CENTER EXPANSION, PROJECT NUMBER 99-9210 RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Cupertino, California, that Change Order No. 5 for changes to work which has been approved by the Director of Public Works and this day presented to this Council, be, and it hereby approved in conjunction with the project known as SENIOR CENTER EXPANSION, PROJECT NUMBER 99-9210 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that funds are available and no further appropriation is necessary. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st day of AugUst, 2000, by the following vote: Vote Members ofth_e City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino CITY OF CUPE INO c~mu 10300 Tone Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408)777-3354 FAX: (408)777-3333 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CUPERTINO SENIOR CENTER PROJECT NUMBER 99-9201 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 5 Contractor McCrary Construction Company 1300 Elmer Street Belmont, CA 94002-4011 The following 5A. 5B. 5C. 5D. 5E. 5F. 5G. 5H. 5I. 5J. 5K. changes are hereby approved: Change posts and connectors to RFI#83 Install new double detector cheek valve for water Install 2 simpson hangers on lines 5.2 and 5.6 Change wood doors&frame to hollow metal doors&frame Install 4 simpson THA-1 hangers for veranda rai~ers Install reduced size HM door and Frame (~ opening 201 Install Trane Energy Management System and controls Replace.washer with ¼" steel square washer ~ sill plate Install 3/16" thick standoffbrackets for rain water leaders Extend walls, insulation&sheet rock in rms. 122&123 Reuse deck attachment to building (CREDIT) Total Change Order No. S 1,430.00 13;572.00 212.00 787.00 105.00 502.00 39,132.00 372.00 1,450.00 2,514.00 (497.00) $ 59,579.00 Total Project: Original Contract Change Order No. 1 Change Order No. 2 Change Order No. 3 Change Order No. 4 Change Order No. 5 Revised Contract $ 3,357,800.00 2,753.92 9,171.00 175,674.00 14,271.00 59,579.00 $ 3,619,248.92 CONTRACTOR ClTY OF CUPERTINO Title Date Bert ./. Viskovich Director of Public Work~ City Council: 8/21/00 Resolution No. 00-221 .(Date) CITY OF CUPE INO City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 FAX (408) 777-3333 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM Summary AGENDA DATE August 21, 2000 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Modification of maintenance agreement with Tally Enterprises for curb, gutter and sidewalk repair BACKGROUND The City has gutter repair. index. an on-going maintenance agreement with Tally's Enterprises for sidewalk, curb and The current year-to-year contract allows for annual increases based on the cost-of-living Tally's Enterprises has requested an increase greater than allowed based on unforeseen increases in the prevailing wage classification used in the contract. The range is 4-10% over and above the CPI of 4.2%. Staff has reviewed other cities' sidewalk repair contracts and found that our contract is still below others, which would warrant us to continue services with Tally's Enterprises. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. , authorizing a one-time increase to change the base and continue the current maintenance agreement with a cost-of-living increase annually. irector of Pub~ Works Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager Printed on Recycled Pal)er RESOLUTION NO. 00-222 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AUTHORIZING MODIFICATION OF MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AND TALLY'S ENTERPRISES FOR SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino has a year-round maintenance agreement with Tally's Enterprises for sidewalk construction and repair; and WHEREAS, the current year-to-year contract allows for annual increases based on the cost-of-living index; and WHEREAS, sizable prevailing wage increases have made it desirable to increase the base amount to reflect said prevailing wage increases. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Cupertino hereby authorizes a modification to said maintenance agreement to allow a one-time increase to change the base and continue the current maintenance agreement with a cost-of-living increase annually. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st day of August, 2000, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino RESOLUTION NO. 00-223 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND DEVELOPER G. B. ESTATE HOMES, LLC; 10322 NORTH STELLING ROAD, APN 326-30-089 WHEREAS, there has been presented to the City Council a proposed improvement agreement between the City of Cupertino and developer G. B. Estate Homes, LLC, for the installation of certain municipal improvements at 10322 North Stelling Road and said agreement having been approved by the City Attorney, and Developer having paid the fees as outlined in the attached Exhibit A; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Mayor and the City Clerk are hereby authorized to sign the aforementioned agreement on behalf of the City of Cupertino. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st day of Augnst, 2000, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council . AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino Resolution 00-223 Page 2 DEVELOPMENT: LOCATION: EXHIBIT "A" SCHEDULE OF BOND, FEES, AND DEPOSITS G. B. Estate Homes, LLC 10322 North Stelling Road A. Faithful Performance Bond: NINE THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS B. Labor and Material Bond: NINE THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS C. Checking and Inspection Fees: Off-site: $ 9,000.00 On-site: $1,000.00 Off-site: $ 9,000.00 On-site: $1,000.00 $1,975.00 ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE AND 00/100 DOLLARS D. Indirect City Expenses: E. Development Maintenance Deposit: ONE THOUSAND AND 00/100 DOLLARS F. Storm Drainage Fee: TWO HUNDRED SEVENTY-EIGHT AND 00/100 DOLLARS G. One Year Power Cost: ONE HUNDRED AND 00/100 DOLLARS N/A $ 1,000.00 $ 278.00 $ 100.00 H. Street Trees: By Developer I. Map Checking Fee: N/A J. Park Fee: N/A K. Water Main Reimbursement: N/A L. Maps and/or Improvement Plans: As specified in Item #23 of agreement - RESOLUTION NO. 00-224 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN THE "SPARE THE AIR CITY AND COUNTY" CAMPAIGN WHEREAS, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District is conducting its voluntary Spare the Air program from June to October each year in the nine counties that comprise the San Francisco Bay Area; and WHEREAS, Spare the Air is now in its tenth year and has more that 1,200 public and private employers who have pledged to participate in the Spare the Air program; and WHEREAS, the San Francisco Bay Area has experienced dramatic improvements in its air quality over the last 40 years, but still sees a large number of days during the year when pollution exceeds state and national health standards; and WHEREAS, Regional air pollution data for 2000 will be especially critical because it will be used to determine if the Bay Area meets the national EPA ozone standards, adding greater urgency to voluntary air pollution reduction efforts; and WHEREAS, the Bay Area Clean Air Partnership (BayCAP) is a public-private partnership that supports voluntary efforts to improve the Bay Area's air, including the Spare the Air program; and WHEREAS, BayCAP will recognize cities and counties that participate in the "Spare the Air City and County" Campaign and carry the clean air theme city or countywide; and WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino wishes to obtain the designation of "Spare the Air City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Cupertino pledges that the City will do the following: Spare the Air City Responsibilities · Become a Spare the Air Employer by completing a registration form with coordinator information. · Educate and notify employees of Spare theAir days. · Print an article on the Spare the Air program in your community's newsletter. · Use the city cable station to educate residents about the Spare the Air program. · Send certificates of appreciation or thank you letters from the City Council to Spare the Air companies in our jurisdiction. · Adopt a policy to get all city employees on e-mail notification on Spare the Air days. · Adopt a policy to eliminate the use of two-stroke gas powered equipment by city staff on Spare the Air days. Resolution No. 00-224 Page 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21st day of August, 2000, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino CITY OF CUPE INO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 FAX (408) 777-3333 Agenda Item No. Iq Community Development Department SUMMARY Agenda Date August 21, 2000 Application No.: Applicant: Property Owner: Location: 5-U-97, 4-Z-97, 7-TM-99, 14-EA-97 & 32-EA-99 Hossain Khaziri Hossain Khaziri 22020 Homestead Road, southwest comer of Homestead Rd. & Maxine Dr. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission previously recommended that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Grant a negative declaration for the project. 2. Approve the rezoning, file no. 4-Z-97, per resolution no. 6037 3. Approve the tentative map, file no. 7-TM-99, per resolution no. 6038 4. Approve the use permit, file no. 5-U-97, per resolution no. 6039 Project Data: General Plan Designation: Existing Zoning Designation: Proposed Zoning Designation: Parcel Size: Proposed Density: Proposed Lot Coverage: Proposed F.A.R. Range: Building Height Range: Required Parking: Proposed Parking: Commercial/Residential P(CG) - Planned General Commercial P(RES) - Planned Residential 0.96 net acre; 1.216 gross acre 7.29 dwellings/net acre 5.76 dwellings/gross acre 33.22% (entire project, street not included) 22' 6" to 24" 6", 2 stories 4 spaces per dwelling 4 spaces per dwelling. Project Consistency with: General Plan: yes Zoning: n/a Application Summary: REZONING from P(CG) to P(RES), TENTATIVE MAP to subdivide the parcel into 7 single- family residential lots and one lot for the private street, and a USE PERMIT to allow the demolition of a vacant gasoline station and the construction of 7 single-family dwellings on a 0.96 acre parcel. Iq"'~ Printed on Recycled Paper Hossain Khaziri 5-U-97, 4-Z-97, 7-TM-99, 14-EA-97 & 32-EA-99 August 21, 2000 Page 2 BACKGROUND: On July 17, 2000, the City Council reviewed this application and directed the applicant to reduce the size of the houses to lower the average floor area ratio (FAR) to 45%. The applicant was to bring the plans back before the City Council for final review. DISCUSSION: The applicant's plans reflect reductions in building area ranging from approximately 150 square feet for the smaller units, up to 240-285 square feet for the larger units. The comer unit shows the largest reduction of 285 square feet (from 3035 to 2750). The plan notes indicate that the buildings will have less area but the plans have not been redrawn to reflect exactly where and how the reduced area will be implemented. Presumably, the applicant will proportionately reduce the overall room sizes to reflect the new lower square footage figures. In addition to committing to reduce the building sizes, the applicant has shifted the comer house on lot #7 eight feet closer to Homestead Road (from a 20-foot setback to a 12-foot setback). The fenced yard area for this unit has increased a corresponding amount. Prepared by: Colin Jung, Senior Planner Director of Community Development SUBMITTED BY: g.t .co David W. Knapp City Manager Enclosures: Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 6037, 6038 and 6039 Exhibit A: City Council report dated July 17, 2000 which includes the ERC recommendation and initial studies Exhibit B: City Council Draft Meeting Minutes dated July 17, 2000 Exhibit C: Planning Commission meeting minutes from November 3, 1999 and June 12, 2000 Plan Set (revised to reflect the lower FAR) g:planning/pdreport/cc/cc05u97a 4-Z-97 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertiao, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6037 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF'THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECO~ING APPROVAL TO REZONE A 0.96-ACRE LOT FROM P(CG) TO P(RES) LOCATED AT 22020 HOMESTEAD ROAD SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the P]annlng Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a rezoning of property, as described on this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given ia accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on the subject application; and WI-IE~AS, the Planning Commission finds that the subject rezoning meets the following requirements: a) That the rezoning is in conformance with the Oeneral Plan of the City of Cupertiao, b) That the property involved is adequate in size and shape to conform to the new rezoning designation. : c) That the new prezoning encourages the most appropriate use of land as compared to the majority of other parcels ia this same district. d) That the proposed rezoning is otherwise not detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals and general weffare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of subject parcels. e) That the rezoning promotes the orderly development of the city. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for change of zone is hereby recommended for approval; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application No. 4-Z-97 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 3, 1999 and June 12, 2000, are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Resolution No. 6037 Page -2- 4-Z-97 June 12, 2000 SECTION II: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No: Applicant: Location: 4-Z-97 Hossain ghs~ri 22020 Homestead Road SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMI]qISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. APPROVED EXHIBITS Plat map (Exhibit A-l) and legal description (Exhibit B-l). PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of June 2000, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roU call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COM3~SSIONERS: Corr, Kwok and Chairperson Harris COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: Doyle and Stevens ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development g:plann~ng/pdzeport/ms/r4z97 /s/Andrea Harris Andrea Harris, Chairperson Planning Commission 7-TM-99 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Tone Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6038 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE A 0.96-ACRE PARCEL INTO 7 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS RANGING IN SIT. K FROM 4,629 SQUARE FEET TO 6,526 SQUARE FEET AND A SEPARATE LOT FOR A PRIVATELY OWNED STREET AT 22020 HOMESTEAD ROAD SECTION I: FINDINGS: WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map as described in Section II. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Subdivision and Procedural Ordinances of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Comi~ission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: a) That the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the City of Cupertino General Plan. b) That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the General Plan. c) That the site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of developmem contemplated under the approved subdivision. d) That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidable injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. e) That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements associated therewith ~re not likely to cause ..serious public health problems. f) That the design of the subdivision and its associated impwvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. NOW, THE~O~, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for a Tentative Map is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enurnemted in this Resolution beginning on 2 thereof, and Resolution No. 6038 7-TM-99 June 12, 2000 Page 2 That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and Contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application 7-TM-99 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of June 12, 2000, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. - SECTION II: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Property OWner: Location: 7-TM-99 Hossain E. Khaziri & Michael Aminiall Hossain E. Khaziri & Michael fi. minian 22020 Homestead Road SECTION 1II: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXItIBITS The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits rifled Tentative Map, Cupertino, California, dated July 28, 1999 and consisting of one sheet, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. ABANDONED WATER WELLS The property owner shall seal abandoned or unused Water District standards. wells in accordance with Santa Clara Valley 3. PARKING ALONG ROADWAYS Parking shall not be allowed along roadways less than 28 feet in width measured face of curb to face of curb. Parking will be allowed along one side of the street for roadways between 28 and 35 feet in width measured face of curb to face of curb. Applicant shall sign the no parking side of the street for parking prohibition. 4. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENT All existing structures on the site .nhall be removed prior to or concurrently with project construction. The developer shall assume the responsibility to obtain all required demolition permits in accordance with City Ordinances. 5. ROAD MAINTEN~ AGREEMENT A reciprocal maintenance agreement shall be required for all parcels which share a common private drive or private roadway with one or more other parcels within the tract Said agreement shall be recorded in conjunction with recordation of the final map, and shall be subject to prior approval as to form and content by the City Attorney. Resolution No. 6038 7-TM-99 June 12, 2000 Page 3 6. TREE PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS All specimen sized trees noted for preservation in the arborist report rifled: "Evaluation &. Preservation Specifications for 13 Trees ~ 22020 Homestead Rd., Cupertino, CA" dated 9/14/99 and prepared by Tree Health Professionals, Inc. shall be preserved. A contract shall be entered into with an Intemarionally Certified Arborist and a copy submitted to staff. The contract will include an agreement to participate in initial site inspection prior to demolition, grading or construction activity to confirm installation of protection measures, participation in plan development which requires the arborist to be involved prior to building demolition, grading and road consumction plans to confam recommended practices are implemented. The contract shall also require the arborist to submit quarterly written reports to staff confirming site inspections have been made and recommended protection measures have been implemented. A bond in the mount of $60,000 shall be submitt~ for the protection of all specimen sized trees required to be protected during development. The bond may be released following final inspection by the above reference arborist who shall report in writing to. the City the status of the trees and their expectancy of survival. 7. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the mount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90- day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 8. INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENTS The applicant shall record an appropriate deed restriction and covenant running with the land, subject to approval of the City Attorney, for all parcels which share a common private drive or private roadway with one or more other parcels. Said deed restriction shall provide for necessary reciprocal ingress and egress easements to and from the affected parcels. Said easements shall be recorded at such time as interest in one or more of the affected parcels is initially sold or transferred to another party. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 10. STREET WIDENING Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided Standards and specifications and as require, d by thc.City Engineer. in accordance with City CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. Resolution No. 6038 7-TM-99 June 12, 2000 Page 4 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Surface flow across public sidewalks may be allowed in the R-l, R-2 and R-3 zones unless storm drain facilities are. deemed necessary by the City Engineer. Development in all other zoning districts shall be served by on site storm drainage facilities connected to the City storm drainage system. If City storm drains are not available, drainage facilities shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checldng and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for undergrounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. a. Checking & In-~pectionFees: b. Development Maintenance Deposit: $3,000.00 c. Storm Drainage Fee: $1,623.15 d. Power Cost: $75.00 per street light e. Map Checking Fees: $482.00 f. Park Fees: $15,750.O0/nnit $ 5% of Improvement Cost or $1,975.00 minimum Resolution No. 6038 7-TM-99 June 12, 2000 Page 5 g. Grading Permit: $ 5% of On-site Improvement Cost or $156.00 minimum The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a £mal map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 19. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipmem is not visible from public street areas. 20. DEDICATION OF WATERLINE The developer shall execute a quitclaim deed for underground water rights to California Water Water and shall reach an agreement with Califoraia Water for water service to the subject development. 21. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity which disturbs soil. Blv[P plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS (Section 66474.18 California Government Code) I hereby certify that thc engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. of this Resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices. /s/ Bert Viskovich Bert Viskovich, City Engineer Resolution No. 6038 7-TM-99 June 12, 2000 Page 6 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12~ day of June, ~000 at a Regular Meeting of the Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: Planning AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Corr & Kwok COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Harris COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: Doyle & Stevens ATI'EST: APPROVED: /s/ Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development /s/ Andrea Harris Andrea Harris, Cbaivpm, aon Cupertino planning Commission g:\planning\pdreportkreskr7tm99 5-U-97 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Tone Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 · RESOLUTION NO. 6039 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO DEMOLISH A VACANT SERVICE STATION AND CONSTRUCT 7 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENCES ON A 0.96 ACRE SITE SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commi.qsion of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section II. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said applicati°n; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this rifle. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit is hereby recommended for approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution be~nning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. 5-U-97 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 3, 1999 and June 12, 2000, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION II: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: 5-U-97 Hossain Khaziri 22020 Homestead Road Resolution No. 6039 5-U-97 June 12, 1999 Page -2- SECTION HI: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. APPROVED EXItIBITS The recommendation.of approval is based on Exhibits rifled: "PROPOSED SEVEN NEW HOUSES FOR MICHAEL AMINIAN & HOSSAIN KHAZIRI, 22020 HOMESTEAD ROAD, CUPERTINO, CALIF." Dated May 1999 and consisting of 6 sheets labeled A-1 through A-6, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. CLOSURE OF MONITORING WELLS Prior to building permit approval, the applicant shall submit evidence of proper closure of monitoring wells in accordance with Santa Clara Valley Water District standards. 3. TREE PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS All specimen sized lrees noted for preservation in the arborist report rifled: "Evaluation 8: Preservation Specifications for 13 Trees ~ 22020 Homestead Rd., Cupertino, CA" dated 9/14/99 and prepared by Tree Health PrOfessionals, Inc. shall be preserved. A contract shall be entered into with an Internationally Certified Arborist and a copy submitted to staff. The contract will include an agreement to participate in initial site inspection prior to demolition, grading or consmaction activity to confirm installation of protection measures, participation in plan development which requires the arborist to be involved prior to building demolition, grading and road construction plans to confam recommended practices are implemented. The contract shall also require the arborist to submit quarterly written reports to staff confixming site inspections have been made and recommended protection measures have been implemented. A bond in the amount of $60,000 shall be submitted for the protection of all specimen sized trees required to be protected during development. The bond may be released following final inspection by the above reference arborist who shall report in writing to the City the status of the trees and their expectancy of survival. 4. NOTICE OF FEES~ DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the' 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90- day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 5. COMPLIANCE WITH SINGLE FAMILY REGIJLATIONS Modifications to the approved plans are allowed if in compliance with the single family residential zoning district and the accessory structure ordinances. Resolution No, 6039 5-U-97 June 12, 1999 Page -3-. 6. DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION The applicant shall receive an allocation of 7 dwelling units from the undesignated pool of the residential develoPment priorities table reference in the City Oeneral Plan. 7. DESIGN REVISIONS FOR RESIDENCES ON LOTS #1 AND #7 The applicant shall modify the plans for Lot #7 by moving, the residence closer to Homestead Road to match the Homestead Road setback of the Lot # 1 residence, and design a residential from facade for the Homestead Road and Maxine Drive facing elevations. For Lot #1, the Homestead Road fence shall be pulled back so that it encloses only the rear yard and a residential from fagade shall be required for the Homestead Road elevation. Design changes shall be approved in an Architectural and Site Approval application. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. STREET WIDENING Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. in accordance with City CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 10. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 11. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City. 12. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City. 13. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. [25. 14. GRADING Cnading shall be as approved and required by the City En~neer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 15. DR.adNAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Surface flow across public sidewalks may be allowed in the R-l, R-2 and R-3 zones unless storm drain facilities are deemed necessary by the City Engineer. Development in all other zoning districts shall be served by on Resolution No. 6039 5-U-97 Page -4- June 12, 2000 site storm drainage facilities connected to the. City storm drainage system. If City storm drains are not available, drainage facilities shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and 'other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and in~qpection fees, storm drain fees, park de&cation fees and fees for undergrounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits. a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Development Maintenance Deposit: c. Storm Drainage Fee: d. Power Cost: e. Map Checking Fees: f. Park Fees: g. Grading Permit: $ 5% of Improvement Cost or $1,975.00 minimum $3,000.00 $1,623.15 $75.00 per street light $482.00 $15,750.00/unit $ 5% of On-site Improvement Cost or $156.00 minimum -The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be mo&fled at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. DEDICATION OF WATERLINE Thc developer shall execute a quitclaim deed for underground water rights to California Water Water and shall reach an agreement with California Water for water service to the subject development. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. Resolution No. 6039 Page -5- June 12, 2000 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of June 2000, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Corr, Kwok and Chairperson Harris COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: Doyle & Steven~q ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development /s/Andrea Harris Andrea Harris, Chairperson Planning Commission G:planning/pdreport/res/rSu97 CITY OF 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino. CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department Agenda Item No. SUMMARY Agenda Date July 17..2000 Application No.: Applicant: Property Owner: Location: 5-U-97, 4-Z-97, 7-TM-99, 14-EA-97 & 32-EA-99 Hossain Khaziri Hossain Khaziri 22020 Homestead Road, southwest corner ~of Homestead Road & Maxine Dr. Project Data: General Plan Designation: Existing Zoning Designation: Proposed Zoning Designation: Parcel Size: Proposed Density: Proposed Lot Coverage: Proposed F.A.R. Range: Building Height Range: Required Parking: Proposed Parking: Commercial/Residemial P(CG) - Planned General Commercial PCRES) - Planned Residential 0.96 net acre; 1.216 gross acre 7.29 dwellings/net acre 5.76 dwellings/gross acre 33.22% (entire project, street not included) 44.39% - 53.22%, (average is 49.16%) 22' 6" to 24" 6", 2 stories 4 spaces per dwelling 4 spaces per dwelling Project Consistency with: General Plan: yes Zoning: n/a RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Grant a negative declaration for the project 2. Approve the rezoning, file no. 4-Z-97, in accordance with resolution no. 6037 3. Approve the tentative map, file no. 7-TM-99, in accordance with resolution no. 6038 4. Approve the use permit, file no. 5-U-97, in accordance with resolmion no. 6039 Application Summary: REZONING from P(CG) to P(R.ES), TENTATIVE MAP to subdivide the parcel into 7 single- family residential lots and one lot for the street, and a USE PERMIT to allow the demolition of a vacant gasoline station and the construction of 7 single-family dwellings on a 0.96 acre parcel. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission reviewed this project over two meetings held on November 3, 1999 and June 12, 2000. The second meeting was delayed pending the applicant's final clean-up of gasoline contaminated soils on the project site and clearance from the Santa Clara Valley Water District. At the first meeting, the Planning Commission also directed that a number of design- related changes be made to the plans, including shrinking the size of the second story in relation to the first story. All of the changes were incorporated in the revised plans and the conditions of approval of the project. There are two EA file numbers because the applicant did not submit all of his applications at one time, so two separate environmental reviews needed to be done. DISCUSSION: Applicant Issues: The applicant noted his success in getting the site cleaned up of gasoline contaminants to the satisfaction of the oversight agency, the Santa Clara Valley Water District. He expressed his desire to proceed with the residential redevelopment as soon as possible. Public Issues: One resident spoke in opposition to the project at the first meeting. He stated it was too dense and out of character with the neighborhood. No one from the public spoke in support or opposition to the project at the second meeting. Stafflssues: Staff noted that redevelopment of commercial properties in residential areas should be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood densities. While densities in the neighborhood are mixed, ranging from single-family homes on 10,000 square foot lots to a 3-story condominium project, staff felt the proposed small lot, single-family residential development was a good compromise given the design direction to use the newer R-1 zoning development standards to guide the project. Ground floor setbacks, parking, second story building area proportions and privacy screen meet R-1 standards. Specimen sized oaks are protected on the property. The floor area ratios (FARs) are slightly higher than 45%, ranging from 44.39% to 53.22% with an average of 49.16%. This range is consistent with the range of FAR's for small lot, single-family developments built in the City. Planning Commission Issues: Three Commissioners were in attendance: Corr, Kwok and Chair Harris. The Commissioners were pleased overall with the changes. One commissioner wanted the larger 74 lot to accommodate two units instead of one. The applicant's architect pointed out that the single-family type setbacks would prohibit this and only a townhouse style development could provide two units on lot #7. All of the Commissioners felt the design of the houses on lots # 1 and #7 turned their side or rear to the main street, Homestead Road, and wanted these houses to have a visible front facade on Homestead Road and Maxine Drive. The Commission's recommendation of approval includes a use permit condition for the applicant to make the following design changes and have them reviewed by the Design Review Committee: · On Lot #1, the house is required to have a front fagade on the north elevation and the sideyard fence must be pulled back on the north side just enclosing the rear yard. 2 · On Lot #7, the house shall have a 12-foot Homestead Road property line setback to match the residence on Lot # 1, and the north and east elevations are required to have front facades. Chair Harris voted against the tentative map and use permit because she wanted to see an 8-lot single-family development with two lots at the comer. Prepared by: Colin Jung, Senior Planner ED FOR SUBMITTAL: Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development SUBMITTED BY: David W. Knapp City Manager Enclosures: Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 6037, 6038 and 6039 Exhibit A: Planning Commission reports dated November 3, 1999 and June 3, 2000 which includes the ERC recommendation and initial studies Planning Commission meeting minutes from November 3, 1999 and June 3, 2000 Plan Set g: planning/pdreporffcc/cc05u97 CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDATION' OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE September 22, 1999 As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure, adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1983, as amended, the following described project was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee of the City of Cupertino on September 22, 1999, at which time the Committee found that the project does not have a significant impact on the environment and; therefore, is recommending to the decision making body that a Negative Declaration be prepared. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Applicati°n No.: Applicant: Location: 5-U-97 (14-EA-97, 4-Z-97) Hossain Khazifi 22020 Homestead Road DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUEST Use permit to demolish a vacant service station and construct seven single family residences. To rezone a .96 acre parcel from Planned Development (General Commercial) to Development (Residential). Planned FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE The Environmental Review Committee recommends the granting of a Negative Declaration contingent upon mitigation measures for gas clean-up, noise and setback requirements. Robert S. Cowan Director of Community Development ' g/erc/14ea97 CITY OF CUPERTINO Department of Community Development 10300 Torte^venue Cupertino, Ca 9~014 408-777-3308 I Srnff Use. Onl~.. .,. lEA File No. [Case FileNo '7--?.~- PROJECT DESCRIP17ON: IAttachments ? ' ' · . ~.~ ~: , .. :' , ,"" .~ ~ . ~ . Project Description.'T:,~,'.%~.,,~, , ~,,,,..,:p, - .'.~-,., ,-,, ~rl :,,:,.!. ,, ,~ r,. ~: · ~ · ,/'" .~..~ ' .'-~_ I ., ~. . . _ s ~. · Environmental S, ,ingett , PROJECT DESC'RIlaTION: Site Area (ac.) ~ )c~ {~. Building Coverage . % Exist. BuildinLs:f. Proposed Bldg., s.f. .---.i/_ -'"'-- c',2. - .~'l Zone (':'(,7 ,::.~ G.P. Designation rt. ~ .L'(:C Assessor's Parcel No. ~1,'J' If Residential, Units/Gross Acre Unit Type #1 Unit Type #2 Unit Type #3 Unit Type Total# Rental/Own Bdrms Total s.f. Price Unit Type Applicable Special A~a Pimps: (Ch~k) Monta Vista Design.?u. idelines ~ N. De Anza Conceptual r'---] S. Dc Anza Conceptual S. Sara-Sunny Conceptual Stevens Crk Blvd. Conceptual ~ Stevens Creek Blvd. SW & L'scape If Non-Residential, Building Area s.f. FAR Max. Empioyees/ShiR~ Parking Required Parking Provided 7-.".Y ', Project Site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area YES '? NO I A) GENERAL PLAN SOURCES D) OUTSIDE 1) Cupertino General Pien. Land Usc Element 23) 2) Cupertino General Plan, Public Safety Element 24) 3) Cupertino General Plan. Housing Element 25) 4) Cupertino General Plan, Transportation Element 26) 5) Cupertino General Plan, Environmental Resources 27) 6) Cupertino General Plan, Appendix A- Hillside Development 7) Cupertino General Plan, Land Use lviap 29) 8) Noise Element Amendment 'tO) 9) City Ridgeline Policy 31) 10) Cupertino General Plan Conswaint Maps 34) B) CUPERTINO SOURCE DOCUMENTS 11) Tree P~.servation ordinance 778 12) City Aerial Photography Maps 13) "Cupertino Chronicle" (Califomin History Center, 1976) '14) Geoingic~l Report (site specific) 15) Parking Ordinances 1277 16) Zoning Msp ! 7) Zoning CoddSpe¢ifi¢ Plan Docun~nts 1 I!) City Noise Ordinance . C) CITY AGENCIES 19) Cupertino Community Development Dept. 20) Cupertino Public Works Dept. 21) Cupertino Parks & Recreation Deparanent 22) Cupertino Water Utility AGENCIES County Planning Department Adjacent City's Planning Department County Deparunental of Environmental Health Midpeninsula Regional Open Space Disu'ict County Parks end Recreation Dcpertment Cupertino Sanitary Disu'ict Fremont Union High Schoo[ District Cupertino Union School District Pacific Gas and Eleclric Santa Clara County Fire Depmment County Sheriff CALTRANS County Trampo~lation Agency Santa Clara Valley Water District E) OUTSIDE AGENCY DOCUMENTS 37) BAAQMD Survey of Conteminant Excesses 38) FEMA Flood Maps/SCVWD Flood Maps 39) USDA, 'Soils of Santa Clara County" 40) County Hazardous Waste Management Plan 41) County Heritage Resources Inventory 42) Santa Clara Valley Water District Fuel Leak Site 43) CalErA Hazardous Wast~ and Subsume, us Site List OTHER SOURCES · 44) Project Plan Set/Application Materials 45) Field Reconnaissance 46) Experience with Project of similar s scope/characm'istics 47) ABAG Pmjcctinns Series 1) Complete all information requested on the Initial Study Cover page. T~.A~ BLANK SPACES ONLY WN~.N A SPECIFIC ITE~ IS NOT APPLICABLK. 2) Consult the Initial Study Source List; use the materials listed therein to complete, the checklist information in Categories A through O. You are encournged to cite. other relevant sources; if such sources are used, job in their title(s) in the "Source" column next to the question to which they relate. 3) If you check any of the "YES" response to any questions, you must attach a sheet explaining the potential impact ~ud suggest mitigation if needed. 4) When expl~ning any yes response, label your answer clearly ~.~auple ~1 - 3 Historical") Please try to respond concisely, and place ns many explanatory responses ns possible on each pa[~e. 5) Upon completing the checklist, sign and date the Pr~pnrer's Affidavit. 6) Please attach the following materials before submitting the Initial Study to the City. - Proj~at Plan Set of Lq~alative Document (1) copy - Location map with site clearly marked (when applicabin) IMPACT YES WILL THE PROJECT... ~ot Significant Significant 'umulative SOURCE Significant (Mitigation (No NOI Pr~puscd) Mifi?~alion Proposed) A) ~ USE GENEICa~ PLaN 1) Rcquir~ a change from ll~e land use 1 C,~neral Plan? 3) Rcquir~ s change of an agop~ed sp~ciiic plan or other adop~d policy 0 0 0 0 17.18 .q~au:manO "~djoinin~ p_mpeni_~? · ~ utsrup~br divide thc physical ~ " neighborhood? B) GEOLOGIC./SI~ISMIC HAZARD 1) Be located in an ma which has po~ntial for major $,olog,¢ hazard? ~ 0 0 0 0 1.14 2) Be Ioca~d on or adjacant m a Zone? 2 4) Be Ioca~d in ~ ~aofsoii shfin~swcll, soil ~cp or scvc~ 1.~,10 ~msio~)? ~ C~c subs~ti~ erosion or ' 6) C~ subs~g~ dismptio~ ovemv~fing ofmil ~i~r on~i~ oroff- sim f~? 1039 8) Involve ~cfion of 8 buildinL or ~ ~0~ P~ I) ln~ ~ ~ ~ov~ ~. or ~ f.10 ~r ~i~ p~s~ Cm~lud~s i~~ ' ' ' or m~fl)~ or imp~ ~ ~l~ pmdu~tvi~ of ~der ~e Willi~on A~ or ~y ~ IMPACT YES ,, xLL THE PROJECT... ~ot significant Significant Cureulative SOURCE Signifir. an~ (Mitigation (No NO Proposed) Mitig~on Pm~sed) ,) Subsmntiaily affect any existing public or private recreation facility, wildlife preserve, public trail either in existence already or planned for future implementation? D) SeWAGE/WATER QUALITY I) Result in s septic field being constructed on soil with s~vcrc drainfield Im~ormance iimitetions? 2) Result in a septic field being located within $0 feet of a drainegc swale '~ O O O O 36,39.42 or within 100 feet of any well, water course ot water 3) Result in extension of a sewer main .ewithc,,acity,o,erve..w E] E] E] E] ,,.20.,0 aevelopreentq I 4)Substantially dcgrede surfa~ or ~oundwatet quality, or thc public wa~r 20,36.37 supply, including but not lireited to typical stormw~ter polluntants (e.g. s~dirnent from construction, ' "droeagoons and reetals frore vehicle , nutrients and pesticides from ,,mdscaping reaintenance, reetals and acidity frore reining operations)? S)Be Inca~ed in an area of water supply &)Chaflge in the quality of ground '~ 0 0 0 0 42 waters through infiltration of reclaimed w~tct ot storm water runofe['that has contacted pollutants frore urban, industrial or agricultural activities? 7)Require a NPD£S permit for [~ 20 acres or reore?l? E) DRAINAG F.d FLOOOIFIG w~erl) Interfererecharge?substantially with ground ~ O O O O 20,36 2) ~ chan$c thc direction, rate or ~ow or quantity of ground- ~ditions or withdmwnLs, or cxc~-qons? 3)Clumgc the absorption rat~, drainqe alter the Ioc~ions, cours~ or flow o~its 11 Significantly effect fish. wildlife, reptiles or plant life by ehang~g the , div~3ity or nurebers of existing species, or by inltoducing new species, or by restricting reigration or movereeflO. IMPACT YES WILL THE PROJECT... Not isignificnnt signhqcnnt :umulativeSOURCE Significant (Mitigation (No NO Proposed) Mitigation Proposed) 3 Changethee is,i,,h.b,,.tfood [2 [2 [2' [2 5.,0 source or nesting place for a rare or endangered species of plant or animal? 4) lnvotve cutting, removal of specimen scale trees, whether indi$cnous [2 O O O , i,ll,41 to thc site or introduced? G) TRANSPORTATION 1) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to thc existing s~s~m? l) Caus~ any publi~ or priva~ suz~t .~en~i~ D? ) Incrcnsc u'affic hazards to .,/Adversely affect access to commercial establishments, public ~;~ buildings. ,chooh. parks or other [2 [2 [2 [2 4.10 pedestrian oriented activity aries? ~) Cause a reduction in public ~/' ' project site? 6) Increase demnnd upon existing parking facilities, or engender demand for O O O 0 I~.!6 new parking space? 7) Inhibit use of alternative modes of transportation to private automobile l~ HOUS;~C I) Reduce the supply ofafford2bi¢ .,sing in thc community, or result in theI~ 0 0 0 [2 3. 16 placement of per~ons from their :sent home? 2) Increase thc cost of'housing in the ~ 3. 16 ar~a. or substantially change the variety 0 of housing types found in the cornm~ity? 3) Create a substantial demand for ,~v ~ O O O [2 3. 16.47 housing? I) HEALTH AND SAfEtY dispossl or msnufa~ur~ of po~nfially hazardous materials? ~ 0 0 0 0 32.4, 2) Involve risk ofexploalon or other fom~ of uncontrolled release of use of any existinL or installation of ' any new underground chemical or fu~l storage tank? '~- S) Employ t~chnolo~ which could ~ [2 'O [2 O 40.43 adversely affect public safety in the event of a bre_nkdown? WILL THE P'ROJECT... " SOURCE Not Significant Significant Cumulative Signifimmt {Mitigation (No 1NIO Proposed) Mitigation Proposed) mosquitos or other disease vectors? 33 AIR QUALITY 1) Violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an ~ O O O O :L 37,42 existing or projected air quality violation, or expose scnsitivi receptors to substantial concenu'atious of pollutants? K) NOIS£ 1) Increase substantially the ambient .o~. e..l.=e.t of,. ,.~ect vic,n,ty during conslIuction of the project'/ 2) l~sult in sustained incr~nse in . ..b,ant.o,.e i.v.i, in,. p.j.~ vicinity following coust~m:tion of the project 3) 19~sult in sustained noise levels and duration limits contained in the City's Noise I.) AKSTHETICS I) Be al variance with applicable 2) Create aa aesthetically offensive : site open to public view? ~ 0 0 0 0 1.17 3) Visually intrude upon an area of visible from the valley floor7 hillsides from midential areas or public lands? 6) Adversely affect the atc..hit~ ~' busiacss dis~ct?. ]. ! 7.19 lightin$ sources upon adjacent ptope~e~ LI6 ot public toadw~tys? quantities of fossil fueL(o~'~on-" renewable.anet~, sources? 2) Remove vegetation providing existing or proposed building? 3) Significantly reduce soi~' access to space or private )~atd? N) HISTORICAL/ ARCTIAKOLOGICAL ~) Be located in an area of potential · :~.o,ogi=.o...,eon.,o.,.al O O [--] O '°.'~ r:sourccs? IMPACT YES WILL THE PROJECT... Not Significant Significan Cumulative SOUI~.C]~ Significant (Mitig,~tion (NO ~0 ~posed) Mi~g~on ' ~) A~ect ~ve~ely a pmpe~ ex.pt ~ p~ of · scientific O) P~LXC SKR~C~ · e h~ popui~on of ~ ~a~ c) Public Sch~l,~ '~ 0 0 0 0 29~0 4) Came subst~fi~ ~mpa~ upon fotlowing categnri~: ~ ~nem~ de~d for ~ of ~y FRILL THE PROJECT... Have the potential to:substantially de.de the quality of the environment, to substantially diminish the habitat of a fish or wildlife species; to cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustainable levels; to threaten or eliminate a plant or animal community; to reduce the number of or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal; to eliminate important examples of the major periods of California's history or prehistory? 2. Have the potential to achieve short term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long term environmental goals? Have environmental impacts which are individually limited, but are cumulatively considerable? (''Cumulatively considerable: means that the incremental effects of an individual project are substantive when viewed in conjunction with the effects of past projects, other current projects, and probable future projects) 4. Have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse impacts on human beings, either directly or indirectly? YES NO hereby certify that the information provided in this Initial Study is tree and correct to the best of my knowledge and ~elief; I certify that I have used proper diligence in responding accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted · ppropriate source references when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. i hereby acknowledge than any substantial errors dated within this Initial Study may cause delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and hereby agree to hold harmless the City of Cupertino, ii, stall.and au~orized agents, from the consequences of such delay or discontinuance. '. Pr~ar~r's Sign ~ Print l~par~r's Name · IMPACT AREAS: [] Land Use/General Plan [] [] Sewage/Water Quality [] [] Historical/Archaeological [] [] Public Services/Utilities [] STAFF EVALUATION Geologic/Seismic Hazard [] Resources/Parks Drainage/Flooding 1~ Flora & Fauna Health & Safety [] Air Quality Energy [] Aesthetics [] Housing [] Transportation [] Noise On the basis o'f this Initial Study, the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) Finds: That the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and recommends that a NEGATIVE DECLARATION be granted. That although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, no significant effect will occur because mitigation measures are included in the project. ERC recommends that a NEGATIVE DECLARATION be granted. That the proposed MAY have a significant effect on the environment and recommends that an 5elect One ~NVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT be prepared. Staffavaiuator ', ,~. ",~ ~.L;...; ,.X~--r ,,,. ~.~,~.. Date /~'//~ / ?? g/planning/intstdy4.doc / -xg CITY OF CUPERTINO Dcpartmcm of Community Dev¢lopmcm 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, Ca 95014 408-777-330g PROJECT DESCRIPTION: StaffUse:Only, £^ File case Fii= Attachments ? Project Title Project Location Projec~ Description~ Environmental SeRing PROJECT DEscRIPTION: Site Area (ac.) Building Coverage % Exist. BuildinLs.f. Proposed Bldg. . s.f. Zon~ C.~-.~ O.---=-~. Designation Assessor's Parcel No.~_~/L- 0 '~. -O~' I If Residential, Units/Gross Acre /~) I ~ ~ '~' Unit Type #1 Unit Type //2 Unit Type //3 Unit Type Unit Type Total# Rental/Own Bdrms Total S.f, "Price Applicable Special Area Plans: (Check) ~ Monta Vista Design.O. u. idelines 1---I N. De Anza Conceptual S. De Anza Conceptual S. Sara-Sunny Conceptual l=='==1 Stevens Crk Blvd. Conceptual U-'=] Stevens Creek Blvd. 5W & L'scape If Non-Residential, Building Area s.f. FAR Max. Employens/Shifl:~ Parking Required 1~ Parking Provided I t~ Project Site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area YES b/ NO A) GENERAL PLAN SOURCES 1) Cupertino General Plan, l~nd Use Element 2) Cupertino Genre'al Plan, Public Safety Elmnent 3) Cupertino Ge. nm'al Plan. Homing Element 4) Cupertino Ge. nm'al Plan, Transportation Element 5) Cupm'tino General Plan, Environmental Resour~s 6) Cupertino General Plan, Appendix A- Hillside Development 7) Cupertino General Plan, Land Use Ivlap 8) Noise Element Amendment 9) City Rldgeline Policy I0) Cupertino General Plan Constraint Maps B) CUPERTINO SOURCE DOCUbIENTS 1 I) Tree Preservation osdinanc~ T/8 12) City Aerial Photography Maps D) otrrsmE AGENCIES 23) County Planning Department 24) Adjacent City's Planning Deparmmnt 25) County Deperunenml of Environmental Health 26) Midp~ninsula Regional Open Space District 27) County Pages and B~-ar~ation Department 28) Cupertino SanitatT District 29) Fr~munt Union ltigh School District 30) Cupertino Union School District 3 !) Pseific Gns and Electric 32) Santo Clara County Fire Department 33) County Sheriff 34) CALTRANS 35) County Transportstino A~nay 36) Sant~ Clara Vali~/Water District 14) Geological Report (si**- specific) 1 5) Parking Ordinances 1277 16) Zoning Map 17) Zoning Code/Specific Plan Doenn~nts 18) City Noise Ordinanc~ C) CITY AGENCIES 19) Cupertino Community D~wlopment Dept. 20) Cupertino Public Works Dept. 21) Cupertino Parks & P,~r~ttion Depamnent 22) Cupertino Water Utility 13) "Cupm'tino Chronicle" (C. allfl~rnla FAsm~ Center, 1976) E) OUTSmE AGENCY D~ 37) BAAQMD Survey of Contaminant Excesses · 38) t~9,,(A Fiund tdsI~,/SCV~ nnod ~,Ltps 39) USDA. "Soils of Santo Clara County" 40) County Hazardous Wsem Management Plan 41) County H~it~o l~sour~m Invenm~ 42) Santa Clara Vali~ Wa~' Disui~t Fuel Leak Sim 43) CalEPA Hazardous Waste and Substances Sit~ List F) OTHER SOURCES 44) Project Plan Set/Application Matmials 45) Fw. ld l~ounalssen~ 46) Experience with Project of similm' s scope/charocteristics 47) ABAO Projections S~rim 1) Complete all inform~on requested on the Initial Study Cover page. LEAVE BLANK SPACES ONLY WI~.N A SPECIFIC ITEM IS NOT APPLICABLE. 4) When explaining any yes response, label your answer clearly (Example "N - 3 Historical*') Please try to respond concisely; and place as many explanatory responses as · possible on each page. 2) Consult the Initial Study Source List; use the materials listed therein to complete, the checklist information in Categories A through O. You are encouraged to ci~.other relevant sources; if such sources are used, job in their title(s) in the "Source" column next to the question to which they relate. 5) Upon completing the checklist, sign and date the Preparer's Affi~vit 6) Please attach the following materials before submitting the Initial Study to the City. .. Pmj~t Plan S~t ofL~islatlw Domnoent (1) copy sM)limble) 3) If you check any of'the "YES" response to any questions, you must attach a sheet explaining the potential impact and suggest mitigation if' needed. WILL THE PROJECT... ~ot Significant Significant :Umulstive SOURCE Significant (Mitigation (No NO Proposed) Mitigation A) LAND USE GENERAL PLAN 1) Require a change from the land use ~ 1,7,8 desi~on tor.e s-bje~t si. in the-m' FI F'] F~ F'] General Plan? ]) R~quim a ~hange ot an adopted statement? · ~ 4) P. tSOIt in substantial change in thc ~joining properties'/ ~' ~j blsrupt ~dc thc ph~,sicsl ~nfignr~tion o' an .tahlishcd ~ O O O. O ?, '2,22,4' B) GEOLOGIC/SEISMIC HAZARD ~) Bc located in an area which has 2) Be located on or adjacent to a k~own earthquake fnulO. O O O O 2,14 Zone? 2 4) Be located in an aroa of soil shrink/swell, soil creep or severe 2.5,10 erosions)? . -~) Cause substantial erosion or 6) Cause substantial disruption, dispi,,ccmcnt, compaction or O I overcovering of soil either on-sit~ or off- sim '/) Cause substantial change in ~re'/ 10.39 ~) Involve constnc~on ofabuildinf. or greater? O RF3OURCE~/ 1) In~ascthe~t, istlngmmovalta~.or '~ 'I,10 result In th~ removal of, naturnl rmour~ F'] O O O for ~omme~ial purpos~ (including imms · · ' sue~ as rock, sand, ~ravel. ~ minerals ,~r top-soil)? ~ly. non-renewable natural resou~e? (Class I or Il soils) to non-agrlc~tural use or impair tim agri~ltutal pmdu~ivity of nearby prinm agricultural land? under the Williamson Act or any Open $oace easement? IMPACT V'ES WILL TILE' PROJECT... Not $ignifimi sis~in~i' C-m.,l,tivc SOURCE $i{nific~n~ {Mitigation :(No NO Proposed) Mitigation ~ro~d) 5) 'Subsumtially ei~ct ~ny ~xis~in{ public or pflv~ m~on ~Hiw, p~ gxis~ Mm~y or pi~gd for impl~cn~on? D) SEWAG~A~R QUAL~ 1) ~ult in a ~ptic field ~ing 2) ~ult in a ~pfic field ~ina I~d wi~in ~0 f~ of a d~e ~e ~ 36~9,42 ~u~ or ~r ~dy? 3) ~ult in ~mion o~ a 4)Subs~tiMly ~g~ suff~ or ~undw~r q~iW, or ~c public ~r ~ 20~6~ ~dim~nt ~m ~ns~on, ~idi~ ~m mining ,c~s or mo~?]? E) D~AG~ ~OOD~G w~rl) ln~emm~e?S~ti~ly ~ gm~d ~ 0 0 0 0 20~6 2) ~ chm~ ~e dim~o~ ~e or flow or q~ of ~ 3)~ge me ~Uon ~ d~ ~n{ mi~on or IMPACT VILL THE PROJECT... ~o~ Signific~n! Significmlt '-umui~tWc SO~'l~CE Signifier (Miti~on ~o/ NO ~.d) Mifi~on 3) Ch~se .mc ~is~8 habi~ f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5, lO so~ or n~nS pl~ for a ~ or en~8~ speci~ of pl~t or ~im~? 4) ~vol~ cu~nL ~ov~ o~ specimen sc.e ~. whe.cr ,ndigeno~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 1,12,4, m ~c sim or in~du~d? G) ~SFORTA~O~ 1) C~c ~ inc~c in ~c which is subs~d~ in ~iation m ~c ~i~ng 2) C~g ~y public or priv~ Sc~i~ D?in~"ccfi°n m ~on ~low ~vcl of 3) lnc~ ~c ~ 4) ~dvc~aly ~gCt ~ ~m~iM ~bl~gn., public buildin., sch.ls, p~ or o~cr ~ ~ D D ~ 4.10 ~d~n o~d ~vi~ ~ ~ a ~du~on in public ~ . ~je~ sim? 6) ln~e ~d upon =x~ng ~i~ ~,,itie,. or ~gender d.m~d for O O O O 15.16 ~ ~hibit ~e of altem~ve m~ ~e? housing in ~c ~mmuni.. or ~uit in ~cnt homc~ o~ho~ing W~ found in ~e co~uniW? ho~ing? d~ or ~~ o~1~ 21 ~voiv~ ~k of ~pl~ion or o~ ~m suh~? . . - ~ of~y ~& or ~l~on ~y n~ ~d ~mi~ or ~ ~ploy ~nolo~ ~ich ~u]d ~gn~ of · b~? WILL THE PROJECT... SOUl'CE Not Significant Significant Cumulativ~ Significant 0vlitisation (No NO Proposed) Mitigation , . Proposed) 6) Provide breeding grounds for f ,r} AIR QUALITY 2) ¥iolnte any ambient air quality standards, contribut~ shbstantially to nfl i~ O O O O 5,37,42 existin~ or project-d air quality violation, or expose sensitive r~¢eptors to substantial concentrations of pollutants? K) NOISE 1) increase substantially the ambient during construction of the project? 2) l~sult in sustained increase in ~'"n' n°"e I~els'n th' P'J' .cinity following construction of the project 3} l~ult in sustained noise levels ["~f and duration limits contained in thc City's Noise Ordlnanc~? L) AESTHETICS 1) lie at variance with applicable 2) Create an acsthettcnlly offensive "'°Pen'p'b'i'"e'? . E] E] 3) Visually intrude upon an area of n.,u.. ,,,n,,,ual,,,es? 4) Obstruct vic. of ascenic ridselinc visible f~om the valley floor'? ,ilisidcs from residential areas or public 10, 2 -rids? 6) Adversely affect the architectural business district? 1,17,19 T) Produc~ glare from mlfi¢i~l ~ 0 0 0 0 lighting sources upon ad jaunt properties I,! 6 or public roadways? M) ENERGY quanti~lu of fossil f~el~o~'~on- ' ~.n~wable ~ sources? 2) Remove v~getation pmvidins s~mmersimd~orwind~to.~ . .0 0 0 0 !!,19 existing or pro ,p0s~d buildin~ ' 3) Significantly reduc~ solar access to an.~.-.,.,,d,...ub,,..~-.on O O O O '"" space or privsIe yard? N) mSTO~UaA~ ARCHAEOLOGICAL archaeological or paleontological resources? IMPACT YES WILL TH:E PROJECT... Not ~ignific~nt 5igniflcanl Cumul~ive SOURCE Significant I(Mitigntion (No NO Pr~x~d) 2) Affect adversely · property of historic ~ I. 10.41 ex,pt as part ora scientific study? O) PUBLIC SERVICKS AND 1) Produce solid was~ in substantial the location, distribution, or densiV/of the human population of an area? 3) Cause substantial impact upon. or ",~crcase thc need foc. e) Maintenance of Public Facilities? t'} Other Governmental Serv,ces? 4) Cause *ubstantial impact upon existing utititics or inffsan-uctur~ in th,' foltowin~ c·tcgnrics: b) Natural OaS? ¢~ O [] [] [] 31 d) Scwqe ~zcatmcnt and disposnl? $) Generic demand ~or usc of any public hcility which causes thnt f, ility ~ 0 0 0 0 19.20.22.28.31 to reach or exceed its capacity? . MANDATOR¥1~IN'DINGS OF' SIGNIFICANCE (To, Be Completed b}/City St~m ~- WILL THE PROJECT... Have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, to substantially diminish the habitat of a fish or wildlife species; to cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustainable leveLs; to threaten or eliminate a plant or animal community; to reduce the number of or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal; to eliminate important examples of the major periods of California's history or prehistory? Have the potential to achieVe short term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long term environmental goals? Have environmental impacts which are individually limited, but are cumulatively considerable? (''Cumulatively considerable: means that the incremental effects of an individual project are substantive when viewed in conjunction with the effects of past projects, other current projects, and probable furore projects) YES NO 4. Have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse impacts on human beings, either directly or indirectly? I hereby certify that the information provided in this Initial Study is tree and correct to the best of my knowledge and ~lief; I certify that I have used proper diligence in responding accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted appropriate source references when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. ! hereby acknowledge than any substantial errors dated within this Initial StUdy may cause delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and beteby agree to hold harmless the City of Cupertino, its staff and authorized agents, from the consequences of such delay ot discontinuance. Preparer's Signann'e Print Preparer's Name . ~. .. . '.ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION [ ' ':,' (Tombe Completed' by C~ ' MPACT AREAS: [] Land Use/General Plan [] Geologic/Seismic Hazard [] Resources/Parks [] Housing ~ Sewage/Water Quality [] Drainage/Flooding [] Historical/Archaeological [] Health & Safety ~ Flora & Fauna [] Transportation [] Air Quality [~ Noise [] Public Services/Utilities [] Energy [] Aesthetics ]TAFF EVALUATION IOn ~e b~ of~is Initi~ Study, ~e En~omenml Review Commi~e ~RC) F~&: ~e,e~ ose ~aat the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and recommends that a NEGATIVE DECLARATION be granted. That although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, no significant effect will occur because mitigation measures are included in the project. ERC recommends that a NEGATIVE DECLARATION be granted. That the proposed MAY have a significant effect on the environment and recommends that an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT be prepared. S va ator IDate C~. [ n..t [ ~,q. ERC Chairperson__._~~ g/planning/inUtd~4.do~ July 17, 2000 Cupertino City Council and Page 6 Cupertino Redevelopment Agency 2ooo.) Project". (Second reading and enactment scheduled for August 21, June 19. The .Secretary read ~f the ordinance. Burnett moved and Chang seconded to read the ordinance by title that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the first reading thereof. Motion carried. Statton absent. PUBLIC HEARINGS DRAFT 11. Appeal of Planning Commission denial of Apl~ permit, to demolish an existing house and construct residences on a net 12,480 square foot lot located at Appellants: Radovan and Helen Adzich. Adzich Properties. Use single-family detached Pasadena Avenue. The appellants had withdrawn their appeal, and there were no other 12. Hossain Khaziri, Application 4-Z-97, 5-U-97, 7-TM-99, 14-EA-97, and 32-EA-99. Request to consider rezoning APN 326-02-051 located at 22020 Homestead Road to P (Res) Zone, a use permit to demolish a vacant service station and construct seven single family residences, and a tentative map to create seven lots. Negative Declarations are recommended, and this item is recommended for approval. Colin Jung reviewed the'staff report and highlighted project densities in other areas along Homestead. He said the new R1 zoning development standards will be used to guide the project. James Chow, the architect representing applicant, said that over the last two plans he had worked closely with staff. He appreciated the assistance they had provided and agreed with their recommendation. Georgino Palmer said he lived in the neighborhood and he spoke in support of this proposal. He said he was glad to see the derelict station gone. Chang and Bumett liked the project. Lowenthal said that two neighbors had contacted him about their concerns that the proposal doesn't match the surrounding area. It would be neither high density nor R-1 development, and they would haVe preferred either of those types of projects. Lowenthal said that with this density and the possible redevelopment of the school site, a 51 percent floor area ratio (FAR) would defeat the intent of the R-1 zoning standards recently enacted. He felt it would encourage the construction of large houses, and thought the FAR should be a maximum of 45 percent. Associate Planner Colin Jung said they had surveyed smaller-lot, single-family developments, and showed a chart of those projects, which were done before the implementation of the current R-1 ordinance. July 17, 2000 Cupertino City Council and Page 7 Cupertino Redevelopment Agency DRAFT James shared the concerns expressed by Lowenthal. She said that Council had made a promise to the community, and other developers have been held accountable. Burnett agreed that the houses are very large, and there is linkage between price and affordability. Lowenthal suggested a large common area. James said she could support more density if there was a benefit to the community, but she did not see it in this case. She suggested that the staff continue to work with the applicant, and that this item be continued for one month. Burnett agreed, but said that council should be clear about what they want, since this project was begun before the new FAR was adopted. Lowenthal said an average FAR of 45 percent for the whole development would be okay. Burnett asked that the comer building be made smaller. Michael Aminian, representing the applicant, said they have cleared four gas stations in town. This project took two years until it was acceptable to the Planning Commission and staff, and the applicant hoped to get the demolition permit in the next two weeks. He. agreed that they will go back to work to reduce the FAR to 45 percent. Lowenthal moved to continue this item to August 21, and to ask the applicant to work with staff to create another plan with an average 45 percent FAR for the entire project. Bumett seconded and the motion carried 4-0, with Statton absent. 13. to City Council from the Planning Commission regarding a use permit to single-family dwellings and construct eight townhomes totaling 13,686 square 23,170 square foot lot (applications 16-U-99, 31-EA-99). Stanley Wang; 10060 S. and 10051 Bianchi Way (APN's 359-07-003, 359-07-004, and 359-07-015). A ne declaration is recommended and this item is recommended for approval. Planner Vera Gil gave the staff Piaseeld said that since this l°t is literally one lot south of Stevens Creek, it seemed that not as necessary to include pedestrian access because the small benefit of including it more problems in the project. James said that Capt. Jeff Miles, Santa Clara safe solution. iff's Office, felt that this was a Lowenthal said this was a good solution. He would have although staff tried to make that happen, there was too access, and Bumett said this project is incompatible here. It has a high FAR, but no limit. Planning Commission Minutes 3 November 3, I ~)t)~) /S. Ms. ,rdell referred to the site plan and illustrated the location of the Starbucks, and noted thai the area was 315 feet away from the Starbucks. She noted that comments had been received early noise from the location. Ms. Wordell said that it is a Starbucks policy that em not be outside before dawn for safety reasons. The applicant of day, and he the Starbueks policy that employees not be outside thc business until light where the trash containers were located. Chair Doyle opened the lng for public input. Mr. Jim Lepetich, 20570 Sc~ Drive, expressed concern about the increase in noise Ii'om Ibc shopping center, from the delivery trucks and ground sweeping equipment, ilo noted that the ground sweeping ent operated in some instances at 4 I1.111. (~11 Ntmtl:lys. said that he was working with code mt to resolve the issue of tile operating hours o1' garbage trucks. Mr. Lepetich arrival of delivery trucks at 5:10 a.m. at olher businesses, and expressed concern about arrival if Starbucks was open at 5 a.m. Mrs. Jacqueline Lepetich, 20570 Scofield Drive, delivery and garbage trucks. She said that the often overfilled and trash was piled around the rece expressed concern abou! thc noise I'~'oln thc receptacles in thc shopping centre' were Chair Doyle closed the public input portion of the meeting. The applicant said that Starbucks' policy was to go around e'~h~xy l0 minutes externally and internally to empty trash receptacles if needed. He said it was good b~iness practice to focus on a clean environment. . ~ . Mr. Cowan noted that the property owner would be notified of the concerns r'l~ttivc' to thc' garbage trucks, delivery trucks and street sweeping equipment. Chair Doyle indicatcdN?l an additional trash receptacle would be required at the edge of the property. ~ \ MOTION: Com. Harris moved to approve Application 13~ord!ng- to.N~e model resolution, with an additional condition for an add'~ containbrxal thc southern end of the property, x~ SECOND: Com. Stevens ~ ABSENT: Com. Con' ~ ¥~TE: Parsed d 0 0 ~t Application No.(s): Applicant: Location: 5-U-97 (14-EA-o7, 4,Z-97) Hossain Khaziri 22020 Homestead Road (and Maxine) Use Permit to demolish a vacant service station and construct 7 single-family residences. To rezone a .96 acre parcel from Planned Development (general commercial) to Planned Development (residential) Planning Commission Minutes 4 November 3. 190O Tentative City Council meeting December 6. 1999 Staff presentation: The video presentation reviewed the application to demolish an abandoned gas station and redevelop with 7 two-story single family homes, and rezone the {}.96 acre parcel I'mm P(CG) to P(RES). Staff will address issues such as cleaning up existing hazardous materials the site, removal and retention of trees, noise levels, designs as they apply h~Cul3crlino's residential single family standards, and privacy protection. Staff' recommcnd.s appmwH of Ibc project based on the conditions of approval. A recommendation will be li,rwardcd December 6 City Council meeting for a final decision. Mr. Colin Jung, Associate Planner, said that the application dated back to 1907 because of a number of issues involved. In response to Com. Harris' request for more information on the hazardous materials issnc. Mt'. Jung said that the site had leaking underground tanks, and the cleanup process has lakcll a tltlllll~Cl' of years, using vapor extraction equipment on the site. He said that they had not yet received a case closure letter from the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD); however Ibc SCVWI) did not generally prohibit redevelopment on the site as long as cleanup could continue while redevelopment was taking place. He cited as an example the Taco Bell Restaurant where cica,rap was continued after the facility was open for business. He said that according to thc applicant, most of the residual contamination was located below Lot 7. Mr. H. Khaziri, applicant, explained that only soil contamination existed below Lot 7, and tha! the SCVWD required a sample boring from the area, and a closure letter was expected I'rom SCVWD following receipt of a report at the end of the month. He reviewed the cleanup clTorts Ihat look place over the past years. Mr. Jung clarified that Exxon was responsible for the cleanup, not Mr. Klmziri, allhough hc was the property owner. He said approval would be contingent upon receipt ol' the closure letter Ii'om SCVWD or a cleanup plan approved by SCVWD be provided. Mr. Jung provided a color board and individual drawings of the elevations. Mr. James Chao, architect~ said he felt confident that the closure letter would be received from thc SCVWD, and explained that typically conditions are imposed so that the building permil would not be issued until the report is reviewed by staff. He pointed out that the designs of Ihe ho,nes took into account visual impacts and privacy impacts on the adjacent neighbors, lie said a grcal deal of effort went into designing a project that would fulfil the need tbr at'lbrdahle housing, ye! Iii into the community. He expressed his appreciation to staff for their input in helping reach a Ihr superior situation than when it first started. Mr. Chao said that he worked with acouslical engineers to determine what mitigation for possible noise from Highway 85; witl~ an arborisl to identify trees, conditions of trees, trees for retention and removal; landscaping will be dmugh! resistant. In response to Com. Harris' questions about the hazardous materials cleanup equipment. M,-. Khaziri explained that gasoline contamination still existed, close to street dedication on I~ol 7 where the leaking tanks existed. He said that the environmental piping was located on Lot 7 near the street dedication. He said that the development on the other 6 lots could continue while Iht cleanup was continuing on Lot 7. He reiterated that a closure letter was expected Novcnfl3er 30 when the report is submitted to the SCVWD. Planning Commission Minutes Mr. Jung reported that the changes suggested by Larry Cannon, city architect, were inct~rl,tn'mcd m the plans submitted. Mr. Chao said that tile arborist's recommendatiosls for tree retention amd pruning will be implemented, as noted in tile attached staff report. Noise mitigation for Lots 1 and 7 was discussed, as outlined in tile staff report. Thc modified design of Lot 7 was also discussed. Mr. Chao answered questions about thc house designs and privacy impacts. Chair Doyle opened the meeting for public input. Mr, Ed Bloom, 22150 Wallace Drive, Cupertino, compared the. presentation of tile proposal lo Iht sale of a custom automobile to a potential buyer. He said he t'elt the project was not suited I'or Iht particular area. Referring to a map of the area, he illustrated various projects and exceptions made to particular projects. He voiced his objection to building a housing project next to I Iomestead Road, and pointed out the traffic impacts and noise impacts to the residents. He roi'erred lo Ihe proposed site plan and expressed concern about the size of the front and rear yards of the proposed homes. Mr. Bloom concluded by stating that approval of the 'project would nol help community or protect the residents. Chair Doyle closed the public input portion of the meeting. Mr. Khaziri said that he could not at this time approximate tile selling price o1' tilt prt,poscd homes, but felt it was a more appropriate use for the property than another service station. Itc said thc original proposal was for 10 townhouse units, but felt that the 7 s2ngle family homes was mom appropriate. Mr. Jung answered questions about second story setbacks and floor area ratios of the proposed project. Chair Doyle summarized the key issues: noise level mitigation; setbacks to I lomestead and Maxine; should there be FARs in excess of 35% on lots of 4,000 to 6,000 sq. I'L in an arcs predominantly 9,000+ sq. ft. lots; hazardous materials; zoning change; number of lots: concept small lot subdivisions; detail on fencing; and Lot 7. Com. Harris said that she was in favor of the proposal; setbacks on Homestead and Maxine were appropriate; noise mitigation to be accomplished; said that the problem with the development was that the second floors were too big; the houses could be 3 bedroom homes instead of 4 bedrooms, which would allow the second floor to be smaller and closer to tile 65/35 ratio which was developed for RI and the visual massing. She said that the lot size was appropriate; however, she was concerned with Lot 7, and did not want building on Lot 7 to proceed until all thetoxics were gone. She said that she would also prefer 2 homes to be built on Lot 7, but would address Ihs! in the future. Com. Harris said that she wanted to see the. November 30th report after tilt borings were done; and said that although water contamination was unlikely because el' the200 Ihol depth, she was concerned about the soil contamination. .She reiterated that final approwd was appropriate until after the report was received. She also stated that she did not like the design Lot 4, which she felt was too long because of the lot shape. Planning Commission Minutes 6 November 3. 1900 Com. Kwok said that relative to noise mitigation, do whatever is necessary such as building ;i barrier or wall to address the noise mitigation because it is near Homestead and ok)sc to I lighway 85. He agreed with Com. Harris on R1 ratio second story, but not with the staff' intcrpretaliou thai it is almost impossible to put a smaller 3 bedroom 2 bath on tile small lot up in the second I'hmr. He said there was a need to address second story setbacks, and that a smaller living arc:t on lite second level would be more appropriate. He expressed concern about the hazardou.s materials especially living in a neighborhood where environmental q_uality is important. Com. Kwok said that in iiglxt of the existing conditions, the community would benefit I'rotn thc pt'ojcct; lu)wcvcr, thc site has not been cleared by the SCVWD and the Regional Water Quality Control Board, although pending, and he had reservations about moving forward with approval o1' Ibc pro.}ccl pcmling approval. He expressed concern about the hazardous materials and also whether or m)l I.ol 7 would be built on depending on the successful completion of tile remediation. I-lc said that he was not comfortable with moving ahead with the project until the site is 100% approved and all contamination removed from the site. Com. Stevens said that he did not feel the project was ready for overall approw~l al lifts stage: hc said that a soundwall on Lot I and Lot 7 could mitigate the noise; and said that hc I'clt that the setbacks were not even; the drawings were confusing; and noted comments I'ronl thc audience relative to Homestead Road being a two lane road, if there were plans to change it lo :~ 4 lane this area; he said he felt it should be reviewed for a stoplight or something similar. I lc saki updated drawings were needed, especially for tile fencing. Relative to second story FAR. when the lots get smaller, the RI ratio of 35/65 would be harder to implement and result in any kiud home size which seems to be what people want. He said the compatibility of Iht lot size was appropriate, other than the egress and access of the people behind. Com. Steve,is saki Ihal a closure letter from SCVWD was needed, and commented that because they had to work with other agencies also, he was doubtful of a resolution by November 30th; tile zoning change is positive because of the need.for housing in this particular area, taking into consideration Com. I larris' comment about Lot 7. He said he concurred with the number of lots; but said that thc way armmd the back of Lot 7 was not appropriate and would prefer something else, such al lurning Iht house around. He said the concept of small lot subdivisions matched the number ol' lots. I.te commemed that the concept would have to be considered in the future because larger lots demanded a higher price and did not resolve the housing problems. Chair Doyle said that relative to noise mitigation, he did not feel a 7 lbotprecasl w.'dl should bc added to the site as it was not characteristic of what presently existed on tile street. I*,clalivc Itl tile setback to the homes on Homestead and Maxine, he acknowledged that a problem exists and a 10 foot setback is being considered on a road that already had some issues. I-lc said lie I'cll thc setbacks should reflect the same as the properties along that street and not cat,se a problem in lhc future; drawings need to be updated prior to approval; second story docs not meet the RI requirements or the ratio. He said he f~lt they should try to maintain the ratio with smnc wm'k pul into that and go forward. Relative to lot sizes, he said they should try to maintain what is presently in the area, and try to maintain the FAR in the neighborhood as it is asingle family neighborhood. Chair Doyle said that he felt a closure letter from SCVWD was needed for the entire site bel'm'c building could be approved, so not to cause problems if approval cannot be obtained. I-lc said the zoning change was appropriate; number of lots should be fewer than 7. Relative to Ix, t 7, hc expressed concern about noise mitigation, which could create a fortress with a wall. Itc said small I°t subdivision concept was suitable; but felt the development was a townhouse development, mit :~ small R1 development and he felt it should be an R! development. Chair Doyle said Iha! he fell -Planning Commission Minutes ? November 3. 1009 more detail was needed on the fencing to see how it is applied, to better understand whal would have to come into existence to make this a developable property. Mr. Chao pointed out that the units were all 3 bedrooms, except for Lot 7 and one more unit. I Ic said that based on an analysis, there would not be a market for 2 bedroom units. Chair Doyle summarized the discussion of the issues. Zoning: consensus that it was approprimc; noise mitigation wall incompatible with surrounding area; street setbacks: 3 I'ecl I-Iomcslcad shoukl be more of a setback; 2/2 on Maxine; update drawings for more clarity; RI ratio second Iloor: consensus was to have more setback; differed on whether it should be the RI; Com. Kwok recommended decreasing 4 bedroom units to 3 bedroom units; Com. Harris said she was willing Itl be flexible with small lot subdivision, but that it qeeds to be somewhat smaller than iq is Com. Stevens said he was flexible, in that it is smaller, and he felt the 35/65 should bc reviewed. Com. Doyle.said they should try to maintain the RI if at all possible but that is ps-cdisposcd having bigger lots. FAR and lot sizes: Com. Stevens said he felt .45 is a maxi,hum, but would agree to RI FARs, and expand the upstairs as the overall mass of the building should be thc .sa,nc; lot sizes: if larger, they would reach the maximum size of the house and in looking to thc I'ulurc, consider smaller houses. Com. Kwok and Com. Harris said that the lots and FARs we,'t: appropriate; Chair Doyle said he was opposed to it because he felt it was not the appropriate place to put small houses, as it was an R1 area. There was consensus on the hazardous materials Ihal there should be a cleanup; zoning appropriate; number of lots: Com. Harris said she would prcli2r a total of 8 lots because Lot 7 is larger than the others; Com. Kwok said he preferred smaller and more lots; Com. Stevens said not smaller lots; Chair Doyle said not smaller. All were contra'ned with the appearance and size of Lot 7, and number of units on the lot. Relative to Ibc concepl small lot subdivisions, Com. Stevens said that although he was not enthusiastic about thc conccpl, smaller lots were in the future; Com. Kwok and Com. Harris concurred. Chair Doyle said that hc was not opposed to small lot subdivisions, but felt it was necessary to understand whal was volcd on, as R! was not voted for, but higher density was, and the concept o1' afl'ordability is quilt skewed on this property. He said that relative to fencing, there was consensus Ibr Ibc need Itl understand the plan. Com. Harris suggested continuing the item until the report was received, with thc assurance I'rom staff that the privacy issues would be addressed. MOTION: SECOND: ABSENT: VOTE: Com. Harris moved to continue Application 5-U-97 (14EA-97, 4-Z-97) lo Iht December 13, 1999 Planning Commission meeting Com. Stevens Com. Corr Passed 4-0-0 ~,,-~_~:: f:_-,_,v q:f}5 ? m_ m o:?0 ? 4. Apph'cation~99, 8-Z-99, I3-EA-?? Applicant, Tom ~Riding Group T' Location: ..... 7816 yesti~al Drive~ R~,~c,,,L~g fro,:',, Pr; P, :z Pr: P.1.6 . Planning Commission Minutes 11 ]une 12, 2000 com~nted that the model was deceptive as it shows a building along the whole from parcel and the buildin~'~be along the front parcel, it is small with parking. MOTION: ~' Com. Kwok moved to approve Application 4-EXC-00 SECOND: ~ Com. Cort NOES: ~air Harris ABSENT:. Co~. Doyle and Stevens VOTE: Passe~ 2-1-0 C~ her issue to the'~t~eption was related to the zero lot line on the DeAnza side. She said she was not opposed to the exception tb~ the hotel at the site. MOTION'Com., .Kwok moved to ap'prOc Application S-U-00 according to~ the amended resolution ~ SECOND: Com. Corr ~ NOES: ?hair _I_I_I_I~.s._ ~ ABSENT: Corns. Doyle and Stevens ~ VOTE: Passed 2-1-0~. e ground and 18-1/2 feet tall for the length of the building along DeAnza Boulevard. ~ · included in the resolution as "hotel, restaurant and separate bar." ~ .C.?^.m.,hK~wo.~k ~c~o~.p~i~m.~e~n~:d,_.staff on their work with the architect, and said he felt it wasa good projec d Application Nos.: Applicant: Location: 4-Z-97, 7-TM-99, 14-EA-97, 32-EA-99 Hossain Khaziri 22020 Homestead Road Zoning to P(Res) Tentative Map to create 7 lots. Use Permit to demolish a vacant service station and construct 7 single family residences. Tentative City Council hearing date of July 17, 2000 Staff presentation: Mr. lung presented a brief overview of the application to demolish a vacant service station and construct 7 single family residences. He referred to the zoning map and illushated neighboring high density developments for comparison purposes. In response to direction received at the previous meetings, the applicant returned with a status on the site cleanup, including a case closure letter from the Santa Clara Valley Water Disuict. They were also asked not to create a walled off development and in response provided a fencing plan, which was reviewed by Mr. lung. The applicant also created a smaller proportion of second story, and six of the seven lots meet the R1 standard of having not more than 35% of the second floor being part of the entire floor area, with the exception of one smaller lot. He pointed out that the FAR calculations were corrected in the staff report (Page 4-3) to reflect the tree FAR as they were incorrectly reported at the previous meeting. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning subdivision and Use Permit. Planning Commission Minutes 12 June 12, 2000 Com. Corr expressed concern that the back of the house on Lot 7 faced the street, and the back yard was open space to the wall. Chair Harris recalled that the previous discussions suggested Lot 7 have two houses instead of one, and said that she preferred that one house face Homestead and one house face the center court. Mr. Jung reported that it was not approved by the majority of the Planning Commissioners. She agreed that Lots 1 and 7 should face Homestead Road, and recalled that a consultant's study addressed the issue of building houses to face the street to create a better community feel. Com. Corr said that he was not opposed to having the driveway where it is so that the garage enters from the side of the house, if the house front faced the street. Chair Harris also noted that Lot 1 did not have a lot of private area. Mr. Jung explained that the ambient noise does not exceed the General Plan standard, and therefore a sound wall was not needed, and the traditional wood fencing would be acceptable and compatible with the neighborhood. Chair Harris noted that the significant change in the application was the floor area ratio. She pointed out the majority of the Planning Commission had previously recommended more housing, smaller sized houses, and were in favor of higher FAR. She said she felt Lot 7 should be two houses, not one. Discussion ensued regarding the feasibility of splitting Lot 7 into 2 houses. Mr. James Chao, architect, addressed Lot 7, and stated that he would have preferred to have two houses on the lot; however, the setback requirements prevented it. He said that if the setback requirements were relaxed, the number of lots could be increased, and he was willing to work with staffto create 8 lots. He pointed out the uniqueness of corner houses in that they were different from regular houses with all front yard, and no back yard. Mr. Chao noted that as a safety factor, he chose not to put the front door out onto the street, but said if directed to change the location of the front door, he would do so but against his practice and it would be reflected in the record. Responding to Com. Corr's question about higher density on the parcel, Mr. Jung explained that originally ten units were proposed for the project, and the Community Development Director at the time concluded that the neighbors would strenuously object to the higher density as it was out of character with the surrounding area. Staff concluded then that it would be more in keeping with the character of the immediate neighborhood to have housing that met a single family standard but was not overly dense. Com. Kwok recalled that the direction given to the applicant was to put 7 houses on the parcel. Mr. M. Khaziri, applicant, said that the environmental issue was emphasized at the previous meeting, and he worked diligently with the Santa Clara Valley Water District to get the closure letter so that the project could move forward. He said it was his understanding that the majority of the commissioners were satisfied with the elevations presented, which included Lot 7. Discussion followed regarding the lot sizes, house frontage, elevation variations, street width, and parking conditions. Mr. Marvin Kirkeby, project civil engineer, clarified that the street width was increased to accommodate parking on one side of the streeL Planning Commission Minutes 13 June 12, 2000 Com. Kwok said he supported the project as proposed. Chair Harris said she would give up on the second house, but recommended that Lot 7 be moved closer to Homestead and fronted on Homestead, and also for Lot 1. She said she felt that at least 2/3 of the house visible from the corner should not be fenced. MOTION: SECOND: ABSENT: VOTE: Com. Corr moved to approve Application 14-EA-97 Com. Kwok Corns. Doyle and Stevens Passed 3-0-0 MOTION: SECOND: ABSENT: VOTE: Com. Kwok moved to approve Application 32-EA-99 Com. Corr Coms. Doyle and Stevens Passed 3-0-0 MOTION: SECOND: NOES: ABSENT: VOTE: Com. Corr moved to approve Application 17-TM-99 Com. Kwok Chair Harris Corns. Doyle and Stevens Passed 2-1-0 Chair Harris said that her objection was that the project should be 8 lots, with Lot 7 being divided with one more house. MOTION: SECOND: ABSENT: NOES: VOTE: Com. Corr moved to approve Application 5-U-97 with the provision that the dwelling on Lot 7 move farther north, and ti'.= north and east elevations of the house should present more like the front, and the same for north elevation of Lot 1 to give the appearance of a front, with fence ending at the back of house, subject to review and approval of the Development Review Committee Com. Kwok Corns. Doyle and Stevens Chair Harris Passed 2-1-0 Chair Harris said that she felt there should be 8 houses. ~ 8-SP-00 Applicant: ~-..~ity of Cupertino Location: '~~~.~ Wireless communication master plan meeting to di~ ~~o~ of work. Staff p~ ~t' Th~on regarding the p~ the joint meeting to ~ of the june 26th planning C°mmissi°n meeting- ~ CITY OF CUPEKT r O 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 77'/-3308 FAX (408) 77?-3333 Community Development Department SUMMARY Agenda Item No.~0 Agenda Date: August 21, 2000 SUBJECT: Public Hearing to consider the appeal of two conditions of the Planning Commission approval of application 09-U-00, filed by Wayne Y. Gong. The.applicant requested a use permit to add I, 120 square feet to an existing shopping center and modify the exteriors of the building. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council can take one of the following actions: 1. Uphold the appeal and modify the conditions of the approval of application 9-U-00, as requested by the applicant, to allow a low planting area in front of the trash enclosure and to allow internal sign illumination; or 2. Deny the appeal and uphold the conditions of approval required by Planning Commission in Resolution #6040, that require a raised planter and externally illuminated signs. No environmental action is required because the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application: Applicant: Property Owner: Property Location: Project Data: Net Lot Area: Building Area: Existing: Addition: Total: Building Coverage: Parking Required: Peacock Lounge I/3 seats(50) 1/1 emply(2) Commercial 1/250 Total Parking Proposed: Parking Deficit: 9-U-00 Wayne Gong, Architect Wayne Gong, Architect 19942-19990 Homestead Road 72,592 square feet (1.66 acres) 19,741 square feet 1,120 square feet 20,861 square feet 29% 17 2 71 89 spaces 84 spaces 5 spaces Prit~tod On ~ecvcted l~oer Appeal of application 09-U-00, filed by Wayne Y. Gong August 21, 2000 Page 2 DISCUSSION: On June 26, 2000, the Planning Commission approved the applicant's proposal to add 1,120 square feet to the existing Oakmont Square Shopping Center. Oakrnont Square is located at the South-East corner of Homestead Road and Blaney Avenue. On July 10, 2000, the applicant filed an appeal of two conditions relating to a landscape planter and sign illumination as follows: · Condition 4 requires that the applicant install a raised planter area with a low wall constructed of stucco between buildings B and C incorporating a 12 inch x 12 inch ceramic tile in front of the trash enclosure area (see sheet A-1.0.). The applicant would like to retain a grade level planting area near this trash enclosure. · Condition 5 requires that the applicant use only exterior indirect lighting to illuminate the building mounted and monument sign lettering. The applicant is requesting that this condition is amended to allow internally lighted signs. Planters: Staff recommended that raised planters be included next to the trash enclosure to enhance the appearance of the landscaping and to help screen the trash enclosure. This proposed planter is not a significant architectural feature. The Planning Commission, while not discussing this feature, included the condition in their approval. Signs: Internally illuminated signs were proposed by the applicant (Sheet A-1.0). Condition 5 of the approved resolution requires that the signs have up or down lighting and not be internally illuminated, and that the final signage be reviewed by the Design Review Committee. The City's architectural consultant, Larry Cannon, recommended spot lights rather than internal illumination because he felt they provided an updated look that fit well with the new look of the center. However, as noted in Exhibit D, at the top of the page, he illustrated an alternate sign illumination Scheme using individual channel letters and internal neon lighting. Enclosures: Planning Commission Resolution 6040 Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 26, 2000 Exhibit A: Project description by Wayne Gong, dated April 26, 2000 Exhibit B: Material board Exhibit C: Appeal letter Exhibit D: Sign recommendation from Larry Cannon Exhibit E: Planning Commission Minutes Exhibit F: Letter from May Chen, New World Child Development Center Plans A-1.0, A-2.0, L-I.0 drawn by Wayne Gong and undated Prepared/}by: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development Approved by: Dave Knapp City Manager G:planning/pdr=port/cc/ccgu00 09-UoO0 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6040 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A USE PERMIT TO ADD 1,120 SQUARE FEET TO AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER AND TO MODIFY THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDINGS AT 19942-19990 HOMESTEAD ROAD SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section II. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the. vicinity, .and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this title. 3) Development allocation in accordance with the 1993 General Plan is appropriate for this center remodel including a building addition, and site and landscape improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit is hereby approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application 9-U-00 are set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of June 26, 2000, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. 09-U-00 June 26. 2000 Resolution 6040 Page2 SECTION II: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Property Owner: Location: 09-U-00 Wayne Gong Wayne Gong 19942-19990 Homestead Road SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMLrNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. APPROVED EXHIBITS The recommendation of approval is based on Exhibits A-1.0 (Site Plan), A-2.0 (Exterior Elevations), L-1.0 (Landscape Plan) drawn by Wayne Gong, except as amended by these conditions of approval. LANDSCAPING The final landscaping plan shall be consistent with Xeriscape Guidelines, to be approved by staff. This plan shall include landscape shrubs and one tree in the triangle area and the rectangular area on the west side of Building A. Trees shall be installed in tree wells in the parking lot in front of the buildings. LIGHTING The parking lot standard poles, wall pack lighting, and sign lighting shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee. The parking lot pole height may not exceed twenty (20) feet. The poles shall be painted a dark color. A lighting plan shall be submitted with the building permit to assure that no glare Or off-site lighting results. GARBAGE ENCLOSURES The garbage enclosure between buildings B & C, shall be replaced with an 8' stucco wall between this site and the adjoining site East. The entry doors shall be wood, metal or other material, not chain-link. The landscape planter on either side of the entry doors shall be stucco with one 12 x 12 ceramic tile per planter to match the building. This enclosure and gate shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee. SIGNAGE Metal or brass letting is approved for the monument sign letters. The building mounted and monument signs shall not be internally illuminated but may have up- or down, lighting. The Design Review Committee shall approve the final sign .lighting and design. BUILDING COLOR The material board is not approved. The applicant shall coordinate with the Architectural Advisor to develop an overall color scheme for the center which include roof, wall, trim and tile color. The Design Review Committee shall approve this color scheme. The entire buildings shall be painted. ROOF MOUNTED EQLrIPMENT SCREEN The existing wood screen on building C shall be replaced. The material and color shall be compatible with the building and shall adequately screen mechanical equipment. The design shall be approved by the Design Review Committee. ,~ o-~ Resolution 6040 09-U-00 June 26, 2000 Page 3 DEVELOPMENT ALLOCATION The approval of this application allocates 1,I20 square feet of building area from the General Plan Retail/Commercial Development Allocation pool. GATES/FENCING The gates proposed behind building A, shall be obscure. The design shall include materials compatible with the building material and color. The design shall be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee. The broken wooden slats on the property line chain-link fence shall be reviewed by the Design Review Committee. 10. CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM Given the proximity to the daycare center, the applicant shall work with staff and the adjoining daycare operator to develop a construction program to address safety, noise and air pollution. 11. ROOFING MATERIAL Roofing material shall be more dimensional than the proposed metal roof, such as composite or shingle tiles. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. STREET WIDENING Street widening, improvements and dedications shall be provided Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. in accordance with City CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. Resolution 6040 09-Uo00 June 26, 2000 Page 4 19. 20. 21. 22. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Surface flow across public sidewalks may be allowed in the R-l, R-2 and R-3 zones unless storm drain facilities are deemed necessary by the City Engineer. Development in all other zoning districts shall be served by on site storm drainage facilities connected to the City storm drainage system. If City storm drains are not available, drainage facilities shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. No increase of storm nm-off is allowed. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 33 ! and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. Relocate Utility Pole behind sidewalk at northeast comer of the property. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for undergrounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of consU'uction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Development Maintenance Deposit: d. Storm Drainage Fee: e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: g. Park Fees: $ 6% of Off-Site Improvement Cost or $1,975.00 minimum $ 6% of Site Improvement Cost $ 3,000.00 $1,453.00 $ 75.00 per street light $ N/A $ N/A Bonds: a. b. C. Faithfifll Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. Resolution 6040 09-U-00 June 26, 2000 Page 5 -'2'J~DEDICATION OF WAIERLINES The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances installed to City Standards and shall reach an agreement with California Water Company for water service to the subject development. 24. 25. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMP's), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in your grading and street improvement plans. RECYCLING PROGRAM The applicant shall develop an onsite recycling program, which shall be approved by the Public Works Department. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of 26* day of June, 2000, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: Doyle, Kwok, Stevens Corr, Chairperson Harris APPROVED: /s/ Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Developement /s/ Jerry Stevens Jerry Stevens, Vice Chairperson Cupertino Planning Commission g/planning/pdreport/res/res09U00 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: Applicant: Property Owner: Property Location: Project Data: Net Lot Area: Building Area: Existing: .__Addition:. Total: Building Coverage: Parking Required: Peacock Lounge 1/3 seats(50) 1/1 emply(2) Commercial 1/250 Total Parking Proposed: Parking Deficit: 9-U-00 Wayne Gong, Architect Wayne Gong, Architect 19942-19990 Homestead Road Agenda Date: June 26, 2000 72,592 square feet (1.66 acres) 19,741 square feet 1,120 square feet 20,861 square feet 29% 17 2 71 89 spaces 84 spaces 5 spaces Environmental Assessment: Exempt from the California Environmental Qualit~ Act. AppliCation Summary: Use Permit to add 1,120 square feet to an existing shopping center and modify the exterior of the building. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval according to the attached Model Resolution. SITE MODIFICATIONS: The applicant proposes a significant upgrade to the existing retail site as described by the applicant in Exhibit A, and includes the following: · 1,120 square feet, single-story addition to the existing building area, · The closure of one driveway along Homestead Road and a redesign of the parking lot, · An upgrade and increase in landscaping, · A building fa9ade redesign, new roofing and tenant signage. Garbage Enclosures: The cemer has two locations for garbage containers, one between buildings B & C, and several behind building A. The containers between buildings B & C are currently enclosed by a chain-link fence with wooden slats. The applicant proposes this same solution, but staff finds that the wooden slats are inadequate over time because they break easily. A dayeare center, located on the adjoining property east, has its play area abutting the garbage area (Exhibit B, aerial). This relationship makes the garbage area somewhat of a nuisance from the standpoint of noise and smell. A condition of approval requires that the side nearest the daycare be stucco and that the entry door be made of wood, metal or other material, not chain-link. The garbage containers behind building A, which are not shown on the site plan, will be blocked from view by a new gate proposed to close off the area to the rear of the building. A condition requires that this gate be made of an obscure material to be reviewed and approved by staff. Parking: Although the increase in building area results in the deficit of five parking spaces, this is not considered significant given that nineteen spaces are dedicated to the Peacock Lounge customers who frequent the space during non-peak nighttime hours. BUILDING MODIFICATIONS: The applicant has worked closely with Larry Cannon, Architectural Consultant. This final design encompasses many design elements he sought. Building Color/Design: Larry Cannon has a remaining concern about the roof color (Exhibit C). He recommends that the proposed terra cotta colored roof be replaced with a dark green color to match the dark green tile, which is used in the accent tiles on the building. Staff is concerned about the proposed peach wall and blue-green accent color because the colors seem outdated. A condition of approval requires that the applicant coordinate with the Architectural Advisor so that an overall color scheme can be developed. A condition of approval requires that the scheme be reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee. The rear of the building will have limited improvements, consisting of paint and a slight roof element wrap around, because it is not visible from the public roadway. The east walls of the building, adjacent to the daycare center, while blank, are also not visible from the right-of-way and staff doesn't recommend any additional architectural details. Roof Mounted Equipment: The roof mounted equipment on building C is enclosed by an approximate 4' wood wall. This wall is leaning and worn. A condition of approval requires that the enclosure be replaced. Development Allocation: The General Plan allocates additional building square feet for the revitalization of retail/commercial parcels. This is an appropriate use of this potential and will decrease the remaining 50,052 square feet by 1,120 square feet, for a remainder of 48,932 square feet. Enclosures: Model Resolution Exhibit A: Project description by Wayne Gong, dated April 26, 2000 Exhibit B: Aerial photograph Exhibit C: Material board Plans A-1.0, A-2.0, L-1.0 drawn by Wayne Gong and undated Prepared by: Approved by: Michele Rodriguez, Planner II Steve Piaseeki, Director of Community Development g/planning/pdrcportJpc/pcOuO0 _- Exhibit A Wayne Y. Gong A. LA. Architect 19964 Homestead Road · Cupertino, California 95014 PROJECT DESCRIPTION - MAJOR POINTS OF CONSIDERATION April 26, 2000 Subject: Renovation of Onkmont Square Center The scope of work for the Renovation of Oakmont Square Center consists of the following: Addition of 1,000 s.f. of floor area to an existing closed restaurant building noted at Building C of the attached referenced drawings. The purpose 'is to unify the design of all three buildings within the retail center and to increase the size of the building to create more marketable space. Addition of 120 s.f. of floor area to an existing space at Century 21 space to even out the front of the window wall. This will eliminate the "nook" area hidden from view from the street for safety. Redesign the parking area to improve circulation and maximize its function. The new work will also include an additional 5,000 s~f. of landscaped areas and 16- 24" box trees within the parking areas. The renovation work will include a complete "face-lift" of an out-dated facade and to upgrade all building and monument signage. Tele: (408)257-8500 * Tele Fa~' (408)257.8844 * E.Mail: WGongAIA~Compuserve. Com ~_/~ TERRA CO'Ff^ Exhibit B STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFIN~ COLOP-: TERP, A ¢OTTA STUCCO WALLS COLOR: PEACH (TO MATCH EXISTINS) Exhibit C Wayne Y. Gong A.I.A. A~ 19964 Homestead Road · Cupertino, Cai,, July 07, 2000 Members of the City Council City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Subject: Appealing Resolution 6040 of the Planning Commission (oq- O- oo ) · JUL 10 2000 ' CUPERTif'!O CITY CLERK Dear Council Members, Please hear our appeal request on two conditions administered by the Planning Commission on June 26, 2000. The first condition concerns the landscaped planters each side of the gate of the trash enclosure between buildings B and C. Our drawings indicate "planters" each side of the enclosed area. I believe the Design Review Committee considered this to be a raised planter instead of a planting area surrounded by 6" high concrete curbing. Consequently, the Design Review Committee recommended a 12 x 12 tile pattern to match the tile motif at the building. I attempted to clarified thi~ item at the planning commission meeting, however, it was not addressed by any members of the Commission. Our request is that we maintain the planters in the 6" high concrete curbing area without the 12 x 12 tile. The second condition concerns the signage program the architectural consultant hired by the City is misting. Our older retail center is struggling to survive and visibility is a must for our retail tenants to stay in business. It is essential for retail merchants to have clear and visible signage and indirect lighting on the monument and building signs are not appropriate for this center. Indirect lighting for the monument and building signs will also be much different from recently approved signage programs for retail centers throughout the City. The adjacent retail center, which we also own, has a signage program with internally lighted channel letters. As property owners of the two centers, we are trying to unify the two small retail centers with a similar theme. A matching signage program will help unify and blend the two small retail center together. We propose an internally lighted monument sign consistent with the theme also. el Tele: (408) 257-8500 * Tele Fax: (408) 257-8844 E-Mail: WGongAIA CWCornpuserve. Corn AL' EXHIBIT D )E$IGN GROUP ~ . ~- TENANT .NAME TEN AJ~T NAk'iE TENANT NAME TET~ANT NAME TENANT NAME h'IONUh'I~NT .Glen ~v&~ CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 DRAFT SUBMITTED Exhibit E MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON JUNE 26, 2000 SALUTE TO THE FLAG ROLL CALL Commissioners present: Commissioners absent: Staff present: Doyle, Kwok, and Stevens Corr and Harris Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development; Ciddy Wordell, iity Planner; Vera Gil, Planner II; Carmen Lynaugh, Public Wor. ks; een Murray, Assistant City Attorney APPROVAL Minutes of the May 22, 24, '2, 2000 Planning Commission meetings MOTION: SECOND: ABSENT: VOTE: Com. Doyle to approve the minutes of the May 22 and May 24, 2000 Planning meetings as presented Com. Kwok Corns. Con' and Harris Passed 3-0-0 Approval of the June 12, 2000 Plannin meeting. minutes was postponed to the July 10, 2000 WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None POSTPONEMENTS FROM CALENDAR: ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None CONSENT CALENDAR: None PUBLIC lqF~ARING Application No.: · Applicant: Location: 9-U-00 Wayne Gong 19442-19990 Homestead Road Use Permit to add 1,120 sq. ft. to existing shopping center and modify exterior of the buildings. Continued from June 12, 2000 Planning Commission meeting Staff presentation: The video presentation reviewed the application for a Use Permit to add 1,120 square feet to an existing shopping center and modify the exterior of the building, as outlined in Planning Commission Minutes 2 June 26, 2000 the attached staff report. The applicant also plans to significantly upgrade the existing retail site including improved and increased landscaping, a building facade redesign, new roofing and tenant signage. Staff is requesting that the garbage enclosure be upgraded from chain link fencing with wooden slats to stucco walls and a wood, metal or other material entry door. Planning Commission's decision on the item'is considered final, unless appealed to the City Council. Ms. Ciddy Wordell, City Planner, referred to the site plan and reviewed the proposed changes and staff's recommended conditions of approval, including final landscaping, site lighting, color scheme, design of roof screen to be replaced, and design of gates between building next to the office building. She said staff was also recommending different fencing in the garbage enclosure area, that the area of the property line next to the daycare have a solid wall vs. a change link fence, and that the slats in the chain link fence be repaired if broken. Staff recommends approval with the conditions of approval listed. Mr. Wayne Gong, applicant, addressed the staff's conditions of approval. Relative to the garbage enclosure area, he said he was not opposed to a solid barrier and would prefer a masonry wall consistent with the adjacent bu. ilding. For the front of the enclosure area, he recommended vinyl slats in the chain link fence, and agreed that they should be maintained. Relative to the trash bins, he noted that it would be the tenant's responsibility to roll the units to the curb, which would be stipulated in the lease agreement, so that the front loader trucks would not come in and damage the fencing material. He said that he added a landscape area to conceal the gate at the Blaney entrance; and proposed to close off the fence area by the Peacock Lounge as a safety factor. Relative to Condition 5, signage, he said he felt the proposed monument sign was consistent with the neighboring 'center, and as part of his goal to renovate the center for the benefit of the community, something different would not be appropriate for that location. He said he felt the signage criteria for internally lit signswas critical to the success of the project. Mr. Gong said he would work with the architectural staff and review committee to define the appropriate colors fo{ the center. He pointed out that the center at the corner of Blaney and Homestead was painted last year to restore the same color, but toned down, and he would like the consistency maintained for the two centers to try to unify the same color scheme. Mr. Gong answered questions on the proposed color scheme and roof materials. He said he felt the proposed metal roofing would make more of an impact, and the building in the other center would be updated at a later time. Chair Stevens opened the meeting for public input. Ms. May Chen, Director of the Child Care Center, 730 E. Homestead Road, said that she was not opposed to the application; however, she asked that her three recommended conditions be considered. She suggested a concrete wall instead of wood slat fence; no construction from 12:30 to 3 p.m. because of day care nap time; and assurance that non-toxic materials only are used for the project. Chair Stevens closed the public hearing. Com. Doyle expressed concern about the proposed metal roof, and stated that he felt other materials such as shake, composite, or architectural roof with more richness, would give the buildings more character; whereas he felt the metal roof was not appropriate. Relative to design, he said the back of the building should be the same material, either masonry or stucco; and the details of the fencing should be referred back to staff and the architect. Planning Commission Minutes 3 June 26, 2000 Com. Kwok agreed, and said the details relative to color and signs should be presented after design review. He expressed concern about statements made by Ms. Chen regarding her request to impose conditions as part of the project approval. He said he felt limiting the construction hours was not realistic; and he agreed that the concrete wall between the buildings would be more suitable. Chair Stevens said that the parking deficit of 5 spaces was not addressed, and although the staff report indicated that because the Peacock Bar had odd hours and the two would be non-conflicting and therefore should be a moot issue, he reiterated that there was still a deficit of 5 spaces. He said he felt the stucco wall would be suitable; however, he felt it should not be the owner's responsibility, and should be worked out with Ms. Chen, and not a requirement of the Planning Commission. He noted that the requirements for safe, non-toxic materials was already included in the code. The issues were summarized: fencing/walls; gates; sign; color; and roof materials. Com. Doyle said that the roof should be architecturally interesting, not just standing seam metal; color to be a more modem color, minimizing the pink color, but referred to the Design Review Committee; sign per consultant's recommendation; gates should be referred to staff to work with applicant on a final solution amenable to both; fences and walls - go with staff recommendation for hard enclosure on the back of the garbage enclosure, with front face of it to come up with a solution. Com. Kwok said he felt the project was appropriate, and to have staff work out the details and come back with a final approval through the Design Review Committee. Mr. Steve Piasecki, Community Development. Director, said that neither the architectural advisor nor staff was opposed to the standing seam metal roof. He said that the applicant was proposing the metal roof as he planned on redoing the adjacent center in the future also, and he noted that the roof elements were relatively small on the development, and commented that the metal roof would produce a good result as well as the shingle. Chair Stevens said that the fencing, walls, gate, and sign would be reviewed by the Design Review 'Committee, as well as the colors. He agreed with Mr. Piasecki's comments about the metal roof, and noted that the new fire station has a metal roof also. Ms. Wordell reported that the condition states that the wooden slats shall be repaired, which would call for replacement with wood slats. If the condition is to return as part of the design review process, it should be stated, unless the requirement be stated as vinyl slats, as requested by the applicant. Mr. Piaseeki suggested that the wording be changed from "replaced" to "reviewed" by the review committee, which would allow the issue of impact to be addressed. Ms. Wordell added that the construction program in terms of noise and hours would be reviewed prior to commencement, and perhaps something could be worked out that would be sensitive to the day care. Planning Commission Minutes 4 June 26, 2000 MOTION: SECOND: ABSENT: VOTE: Com. Doyle moved to approve Application 9-U-00 with modifications to Item 9 to change wording to "review" the desigfi with the Design Review Committee; and to change the roof material from metal to a more three dimensional product, either composite or other materials, and to work with staff on details; remainder as recommended by siaff Com. Kwok Coms. Corr and Harris Passed 3-0-0 3. Application Nos.: ~Applicant: 16-U-99, 31-EA-99 Stanley Wang 10600 So. Stelling Road, 10051 Bianchi Way Report to ity Council: Use Permit to demolish three single family dwellings an construct eight townhouses 17,112 square feet on a 23,170 square foot lot. Tentative City hearing date: July 17, 2000 Staff pres 8 townhouses in single family Plan on side The video presentation reviewed the application for a Use Permit to construct vicinity of Stelling Road and Bianchi Way, following demolition of three s. The application includes an exception to the Heart of the City Specific Ms. Vera Gil, Planner II not noted on the plans, total, changing the FAR report, noting that the Gil reviewed the Planning including changing the frontin however, the applicant did not because he felt it would impose a pedestrian access requirement was of the units and might require the She said the new site plan was more located in the back and not visible of a large tree as a landscape focal properties redevelop. Ms. Gil added variety of materials used created approval of the project. Ms. Gil pointed for small, difficult to develop parcels, and that there was additional square footage for the garages which was lting in a use permit for a total of 13,686 square feet of building area 9%. She reviewed the application as set forth in the attached staff buildings were now facing Stelling Road, not Stevens Creek. Ms. suggestions for changes from the two previous meetings, to Stelling Road; decrease in density; and lower mass; the suggested pedestrian access by the City Council t. She said staff reviewed the site plan and felt that if the placing a sidewalk in the area would decrease the size of two units, which would compromise the site plan. friendly, with front stoops, front yards, garages Road, inclusion of green space, and the addition She said that access could be achieved later as the and the architectural consultant agreed that the plan was an improvement, and recommended the Heart of the City Plan allowed for exceptions it met the requirements. Chair Stevens said to ensure that it states on 3-1 that the applicant intends to provide a tentative map at a later date, with one lot held in He expressed concern that if it is not specified early in the proposal and they are not as owned units, (if they are rental or townhouse configurations). Changing them to owned units at a later date is hinged on the occupancy rate of rental units being less than 5%. I~, said it may prove to be difficult if not alerted at this time. EXHIBIT F June 22,2000 To members of the Cupertino Planning Commission, It is our understanding that the Oakmont Shopping Center located next to our business, New World CDC, is proposed to be renovated and undergo construction soon. For the safety of our children enrolled in our program, we ask for the following conditions: 1) a concrete wall built within the existing space between the former Foster Freeze and convenient store. This would completely seperate our playground from the garbage area. Right now there is only a fence. 2) We ask that any loud construction work be stopped between the hours of 12:30 pm - 3 pm, Monday - Friday, since this is a quiet rest time for most of the children. 3) Follow current codes of safety for a childcare facility. We appreciate your attention to our conditions. If youhave any questions, please call May Chen at 408-255-5330. Or write to our address: 730 E. Homestead Rd., Sunnyvale, CA 94087. Sincerely, CITY OF CUPEPxTINO City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3251 FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department Summary Agenda Item No. oT// Agenda Date: August 21, 2000 Application: Applicant: Property Owner: Property Location: 07-SP-00 City of Cupertino Various City-wide Application Summary: One year review of the R-1. ordinance to determine if it has had a positive effect on reducing building mass and better integrating new construction and modifications into neighborhoods. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Authorize modifications to the R-1 Ordinance, as outlined in this report and in the minute order, including staff level approval of two-story homes under 35% to allow for the design guidelines to be applied in order to reduce mass and bulk. 2. Authorize staff to waive review by the architectural consultant for minor residential additions that require approval by the Design Review Committee. BACKGROUND: On June 3, 1999, the updated R-1 Ordinance to address mass and bulk of new single family construction in the city went into effect. This report will seek to answer the following questions regarding single family development and the new ordinance: 1. Has the new R-1 Ordinance affected the total level of building activity in the City? 2. Has the ordinance changed the makeup of the residential construction in the City? 3. Has the ordinance reduced building mass and improved integration of homes? 4. Does discretionary review make a difference or do the prescriptive regulations adequately serve the same purpose? 5. Has the ordinance created unforeseen problems? Planning Commission, duly 24, 2000 The Planning Commission voted 4-1 to issue the minute order recommending modifications to the R-1 Ordinance, with Commissioner Doyle opposed. Comm. Doyle feels that the additional constraints are not needed. Printed on Recycled Pat>er ANALYSIS Page 2 Has the new R-1 Ordinance affected the total level of building activity in the City? Since the adoption of the new ordinance, approximately 90 building perm/ts have been received for additions or new homes in the R- 1 zoning district. This is considerably less than building staff is accustomed to. The cause of the reduction can be addressed by three events: · Thirty-to-forty building permits were filed between June 1 and June 3, 1999, in order to be pipelined under the past ordinance. · Homeowners and builders took time to learn and familiarize themselves with the new regulations. · There are builders that believe that the R-1 ordinance Chart 1 R-1 Buildin.q Permits by Month 25 2O ~ lO 5 0 Date modifications will be eliminated in the near future and are waiting until that time. Staff believes that the number of applications filed between January 2000 and July 2000 are more indicative of typical development patterns. Chart 1 shows the time distribution of the R- 1 building permit applications by month. Has the ordinance changed the makeup of the residential construction in the City? The new ordinance has shifted the makeup of the residential construction applications, as shown in Chart 2. 85% of the applications received were for new single story homes or additions. Only 12 of the 90 applications were for two story developments. Based on the data and discussion with homeowners and consultants, staff concludes that the new ordinance restrictions have promoted single 70 60 50 40 30-- 20 10-- 0 Chart 2 R-1 Buildin.q Permit Types 14¸ story development in favor of two-story development. Data pertaining to pre-June 1999, building permit applications is not available. However, staff believes that Chart 2 represents a major shift to single story development from predominantly two story development. Single Story New Single Second Story New Two Addition Story Home Addition Story Home Type Page 3 Has the ordinance reduced building mass and improved integration of homes? The new ordinance limits mass and provides for integration by doing the following: · Increased the lot coverage for single family homes to 45% of the net lot area. · Created a 35% floor area ratio threshold for design review of second story homes. · Created a ratio of fu'st floor to second floor area of 35%. · Created a 15 foot second story setback surcharge. · Required that fifty percent of the perimeter of second story walls have visible heights less than 6 feet. · Required that offsets for second story walls with heights over 6 feet every 24 feet. · Created a building envelope for single story homes. · Created a requirement that heights exceeding twenty feet be subject to second story setbacks. · Created a 14 foot height limit to the top of plate for entry features. · Created a Residential Design Review Committee, whose responsibilities were later merged with the Design Review Subcommittee to form the Design Review Committee. · Floor to ceiling heights above 15 feet count twice towards the floor area ratio (not a part of the R- 1 Ordinance, but a related update to the Definitions Ordinance addressing mass and bulk). Design guidelines were adopted for projects that require discretionary review. The guidelines complement the prescriptive requirements of the R- 1 ordinance in reducing building mass and softening the appearance of two-story development. Below are examples of residences that received discretionary approval, and illustrate the reduction in mass and a sensitive transition to neighboring single story developments. 932 Providence Court: This was a minor second story addition to add a bathroom and a fu'st story expansion. The existing home had a second floor to first floor ratio greater than 35%, so an exception to the second floor / first floor ratio was necessary. The addition is smaller in scale than the existing home and is sensitive to neighboring homes. 1021 Tuscany Place: This project consisted of an addition to first and second story, resulting in a floor area ratio (FAR) of 45%. The design of the addition is in keeping with the architectural style of the home and the neighborhood, and actually improves the integration by incorporating a step-down pattern along the right side. Previously, the home had a blank two story wall along the right side. 7593 Hollanderry Place: This project was a second story addition to a single story home, bringing the FAR to 45%. The second story is small and setback from the front and sides, offering a transition to single story homes in the neighborhood. 10285 Mira Vista: A new two story home, in a predominantly single story neighborhood. The building mass of the second story does not dominate the elevation, due to the setbacks and the design of the roof features. This project had a 45% FAR. Page 4 ...... ,I I:1I¢1" I -.. Since June 1999, 18 planning applications for discretionary review have been filed. Of those, 13 have gone to a public meeting, all of which were approved with or without modifications. Three of the items were solely for second story decks. The examples above represent the outcomes of the design review process and show that the mass and bulk of two-story homes and additions have been reduced. The effectiveness of the prescriptive regulations will be addressed in the next section. Does discretionary review make a difference or do the prescriptive regulations adequately serve the same purpose? Staff performed a cursory review of the residential building permit applications filed during the past year. This revealed approximately 10-15 applications (11-16%) that had mass and bulk problems that would have been reduced if discretionary review were required. These include single story homes and additions that had substantial mass and bulk, and two story homes that had floor area ratios under 35%, but still had substantial mass and bulk. A common design proposed by many two-story projects and even some single story projects is a high volume living room and entry, resulting in a massive front elevation that is not in scale and not sensitive to the neighborhood. Exhibit A (following page) offers an example of that design. Exhibits B and C show the evolution of the design based on staff review prOcess. This is an actual project that was approved for 10640 Carver. Page 5 Exhibit A shows a typical proposal consisting of a 15 foot high single story wall plane along the right side of the elevation. The colored line outlines the shape of the first story wall area facing the street. This design provides a 15 foot high living room without the use of a vaulted ceiling. The neighbor on the right-hand side would face this tall one-story wall plane, but would feel like they were facing a two-story wall plane. A typical Exhibit A 14 foot tall entry feature is included. The design results in considerable visual mass and does not conform to the Single Family Residential Guidelines in that the single story eave lines do not match the neighborhood, vaulted ceilings are not used, the entry height is not reduced, and there is not a true single story transition on the right side of the elevation. However, it is in full conformance with the R-1 Ordinance regulations and would be issued a building permit without discretionary review or neighborhood notification. Exhibit B Exhibit C Since this particular applicant was requesting a floor area ratio of 45%, the Single Family Design Guidelines could be' applied. Staff directed the applicant to reduce the visual mass of the first story element by lowering the entry and living room wall heights, and the result was Exhibit B. The entry and living room eave heights still do not match the general pattern of the neighborhood, as the Single Family Residential Guidelines recommend. The neighbor to the right is still facing a rather tall wall plane. Once again, this design is in full conformance with the R-1 regulations, and had the floor area ratio been 35%, would have received building permits without discretionary_ review and neighborhood noticing. Staff recommended Exhibit C to the applicant. This design maintained the single story eave line pattern of the neighborhood. Breaking up the roof form reduced the overall height of the structure. The second story section is more visible, but it is sufficiently setback from the street. The result is a new two story home, built to the maximum 45% floor area ratio, yet offering a softer appearance to the street and neighboring properties. The former Residential Design Review Committee approved Exhibit C. Page 6 Based on examples such as this, staff has concluded that the ordinance alone does not address the mass and bulk of new development without the use of the guidelines and discretionary review. As a result, staff recommends minor modifications to the ordinance to reduce the mass of buildings that would currently be allowed by right, as outlined in the following section. Ordinance Revisions: Based on the experiences with projects similar to Exhibit A, staff recommends the following changes to the R-1 Ordinance in order to address mass and bulk for sub-35% floor area ratio two story homes and single story homes: Lower maximum front entry height from 14' to 12' and lower single sto~_ building envelope wall heights_from 12' to 10'. This revision would serve to reduce the visual mass of non-design review two story homes and single story homes. Apply the single sto~_ building envelope to single sto~_ sections Of two sto~_ homes. This revision would serve to reduce the single story sections of two story development consistent with the daylight plane regulation being applied to single story development. Reword the rear setback requirement. The goal of this would be to clarify the meaning and make it more understandable for the public. The exception to reduce the rear setback to 10 feet can allow for great flexibility in the design of single story homes. The requirement that a usable rear yard space of 20 times the lot width at the front setback line would not be changed, only reworded for greater clarity. Require over-the-counter staff level approval of second story homes with_floor area ratios below 35%. Staff requests that the Commission consider requiring staff level approval for all two story homes and additions whose floor area ratio's are below 35%. Currently, staff can only apply the prescriptive regulations of the ordinance to two story homes and additions with floor area ratios under 35%. As Exhibit A reveals, you can meet the ordinance regulations and still end up with a massive looking home with significant visual impacts. Staff level approval would require staff to make the findings for residential design approval and could be over the counter, similar to the treatment of sign permits. If staff can not make the findings for approval, the applicant may take the case to the Design Review Committee. These modifications would preclude designs similar to Exhibit A from being approved without some type of discretionary review. Homeowners can file for an exception to the R-1 ordinance if they wish to exceed these regulations, but that would give the architectural consultant and the neighborhood an opportunity to review the project. Staff also recommends the following minor changes to the ordinance: Exempt windows that are obscure AND non-openable_from privacy planting. Staff believes that an obscure, non-openable window meets the intent of the privacy protection requirements, yet currently they would still require privacy protection planting. Create a 45% floor area ratio (FAR) limit for single sto~_ development. Currently, the lot coverage for single story development is 45%. There is not a stated FAR for single story homes. High volume areas over 15 feet in height are to be counted twice towards the FAR. If a single story home proposed ceilings over 15 feet tall that resulted in an FAR of 46%, they could presently be P~e7 approved since there is not a clearly stated FAR for single story homes. Staff has been interpreting the single story floor area limit to be 45%. Has the ordinance created unforeseen problems? Basements: Approximately 14-20 homes (16-22%) have been proposed with basements that include bedrooms. Basements have been included in all types of projects; single story, two-story sub-35% floor area, and two-story homes requiring discretionary review. The ordinance is presently inadequate with respect to basements. Staff is in the process of drafting an ordinance update to regulate lightwells in response to the new demand for basements. Administrative Timelines: One of the conceptual principles for discretionary review addressed providing a speedy development process for property owners. Projects that require discretionary . review are delayed by approximately two months on average. The time between the official application and the Design Review Committee hearing is three weeks, and can not be reduced further based on noticing and time required for staff reports. However, considerable pre-application time is necessary in order to ensure a complete application. The process can be streamlined by allowing staff to use its discretion when requiring architectural consultant review of single family projects. Occasionally, projects arise that staff is confident have no design issues, such as the Providence Court and Tuscany Place projects. By bypassing the architectural consultant review, the applicant could save about two weeks of pre-application time and approximately $300-$500. Staff would route the Hollanderry and Mira Vista projects to the consultant since the work is a larger scale. Has the ordinance improved neighborhood input into the single family development process? The existing process does an excellent job of providing neighbors with an opportunity for input into the neighboring residential development. The use of story poles advertises to the neighborhood the upcoming project, as well as the scale of the project. Privacy protection requirements encourage applicants to consider the impacts of their project on neighbors. Furthermore, just the fact that there is a public hearing process encourages applicants to discuss their designs with their neighbors. Prepared by: Peter Gilli, Assistant Planner APP~Df6~UBM~T~: Ste~ Piasecki\ - Director of Community Development Enclosures: Planning Commission Minute Order No. 6045 SUBMITTED BY: David W. Knapp City Manager g:/planning/pdreport/c&ccO7spOO, doc CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Curpertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION 6045 (MINUTE ORDER) OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CiTY. OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE STAFF TO MAKE MODIFICATIONS TO THE R-1 ORDINANCE The Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino recommends that the City Council authorize staff to make modifications to the R-1 Ordinance to address mass and bulk of new homes and additions by doing the following: · Lower maximum front entry height from 14 feet to 12 feet and lower single story building envelope wall heights from 12 feet to 10 feet. · Apply the single story building envelope to single story sections of two story homes. · Require staff level approval of two story development with floor area ratios below 35%. And clarify the R-1 Ordinance by doing the following: · Exempt obscure, non-openable windows from privacy protection regulations. · Create a 45% floor area ratio (FAR) limit for single story development. · Reword the rear setback requirement. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24t~ day of July 2000 at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Corr, Kwok, Stevens, Chairperson Harris COMMISSIONERS: Doyle COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED:. /s/ Steve Piasecki Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development G:Plannin~pdreport/res/7sp00mo /s/ Andrea Harris Andrea Harris, Chairperson Planning Commission 4-9 CITY OF cu?eKt nO 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3308 FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department AGENDA NO. ~ SUMMARY AGENDA DATE August 21. 2000 SUMMARY: REQUEST from the Planning Commission for a budget of $35,000 to pay for consulting services and contingencies related to the preparation of a Wireless Communications Facilities Master Plan. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission and Telecommunications Commission endorse the preparation of a Wireless Communications Facilities Master Plan. The Planning Commission recommends that the City front the cost of approximately $35,000 and establish a fee to applicants to reimburse the City for the costs of the plan. BACKGROUND: The development of wireless communications networks is a fast-growing and fast-changing pan of the communications industry: In Cupertino alone, there are at least six different wireless communications companies building networks, consisting of antennae every mile to a mile and a half apart. The Planning Commission is responsible for reviewing and approving these antennae and their associated equipment. The approvals have occurred incrementally throughout the City without a master plan or vision of what the City wants and how it should look. To date, staff and commissioners have been adept at siting and hiding antennae so they have as little visual impact as possible, but now the most suitable locations for antennae are mostly occupied, while demand for wireless communication services continues to grow. Applicants are proposing more visible locations for antennae, some encroaching into residential areas. The Planning Commission is proposing the development of a Wireless Communications Facilities Master Plan for the City of Cupertino in order to guide the location of new antenna facilities, rather than just react to industry proposals (Exhibits A, B & C). The Planning Commission has enlisted the support of the Telecommunications Commission which has made this wireless master plan one of its Commission goals this year. The Telecommunications Commission will be prOviding technical oversight and some policy guidance for this staff- prepared planning document. The budget is needed to pay for consultant services that will include: 1) outside expertise on various aspects of the plan, 2) information independent of industry sources and 3) consultation Prir~ted or~ F~ecvcled Paper on overall plan development (Exhibit D). The plan will be designed to recover costs through antenna application fees. The budget request of $35,000 includes a 15% contingency. Staff estimates it will take 2-3 years to recover the costs from application fees. Alternatively, the City Council could direct that this expense be considered in the 2000 -2001 budget sessions. Enclosures: Planning Commission Resolution No. 6044 (Minute Order) Exhibit A: Planning Commission Meeting Minutes July l0 & July 24, 2000 Exhibit B: Planning Commission Staff.Report dated July 24, 2000 Exhibit C: Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 10, 2000 Exhibit D: Wireless Facilities Fact Sheet & Statement of Qualifications from Kreines & Kreines, Inc., Telecommunications Consultant Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development g:planning/pdreport/cc/ccantplanO 1 Approved by: David Knapp City Manager Planning Commission h ,,res 2 July i0. 2000 4. ~_l.~cation Nos.: l-V-00, 10-U-00, 5-EXC-00 AppIl~.t: Ann Welsh, Wl~alen & Company L~ation:~,~ Located to rear of 10590 Stoke Avenue Use Permit to allow 16-pa~ntennae aerial on top of an existing 138-foot tall PG&E lattice tower plus associated cabinets a.t~o.~_.~nd level. Height exception to allow a lattice t'~m~ounted aerial at a maximum height of 150 feet where 55 feet is allowed. ~ · Variance to allow an aerial to be located less~h~.. 50 horizontal feet from a residentially zoned property. ~ Request continuance to Planning Commission meeting b~O00 MOTION: Com. Corr moved to postpone Applications 1-'V-~0-U-00, 5-EXC-00 to the July 24, 2000 Planning Commission me~ting SECOND: Com. VOTE: Passed 5-0-0 ORAL CO]VEMUI~CATIONS: None · , ,C~.~F'..~E.~!T C: ~E..'?~- :--~ .~l:.~: -,. .... ...... STUDY SESSION Application No.: 9-SP-00 Applicant: City of Cupertino Location: Citywide Study session with the Telecommunications Commission regarding a scope of work for the Wireless Communications Master Plan. Staff presentation: The members of the Telecommunications Commission introduced themselves: Chair L. T. Guttadeauro, D. Eggelston, E. Tsui, S. Algeri, and W. Mannion who was attending a meeting in Rancho Rinconada relative to communications issues. Mr. Colin Jung, Associate Planner, said that there was no precedent for a wireless master plan in Cupertino, or the county and most likely most of the State of California, and said it would be a pioneering effort for the city. He said these types of facilities were not well understood by public agencies and were much better understood by the private industry who have hired the experts in the area. He said he was grateful that the Telecommunications Commission has stepped in at this point to attempt to prepare the master plan since they were receiving applications for antennas despite the fact that they were already built out to the maximum in Cupertino. Mr. Jung highlighted a portion oftbe ordinance as it pertains to the wireless master plan. 1. Maximum height of 55 feet except when mounted on a building, or when an exception is granted, as an exception for height. Planning Commission Minutes 12 July 24, 2000 EXHIBIT A read "merged with" rather than "shifted to" as the two committees were combincd. Thirc from bottom in first paragraph, add "and included in the FAR." MOTION: Com. Corr moved SECOND: Com. Stevens NOES: Com. Doyle VOTE: Passed 4-1-0 ication 07-SP-00 Com. Doyle expressed concern that they may be imposing another level of Report to the Planning Commission regarding Wireless Communications Master Plan work schedule. Staff presentation: Mr. Colin Jung, Senior Planner, presented the summary of the proposed work program for the wireless communications facilities master plan as outlined in the attached staff report. He noted that the proposal would be presented to the Telecommunications Committee for their approval. He answered questions relative to the proposed work program, including plan assumptions, planning process assumptions, plan schedule, and cost of consultant services. Discussion ensued regarding the scheduling of meetings and cost of consultant services. There was consensus that staff review the number of meetings and adjust the total amount to be appropriated if necessary. Com. Stevens commented that there were other antenna policies, calling out for maximum height, and possibly one on amateur radios. He expressed concern about having commercial antenna restrictions completely different from other antenna restrictions unless for safety reasons. Mr. Jung reported that the current ordinance derived from an ordinance that controlled ham radio antennas and much of the information in the ordinance of standards were developed from ham radio standards. He said the concept was to have one cohesive plan. MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Com. Corr moved to approve the work program, and forward a Minute Order to the City Council requesting a budget allocation to cover costs of consultant services and contingencies related to the preparation of a wireless communications facilities master plan, with final budget amount not to exceed $35,000. Com. Doyle Passed 5-0-0 Planning Commission } ares 4 .luly 10, 2000 some service providers are coming in with broadband wireless access, and will also include data as well as voice. Mr. Jung discussed the process to arrive at the present status. He stated that Cupertino was a Iow profile community, with lower buildings. He discussed what other cities are doing and what criteria they are using The cities either have an ordinance or a set of design guidelines, but have not taken a holistic approach to planning the facilities; they approach it in a reactive way when the application is submitted. There is a set of criteria, and with flexibility in design review, the applicant i.s informed what is needed to make it work and the antenna is placed in much the same location as industry requests, given the ordinance or the design guidelines articulated by the city. He pointed out that Cupertino was fortunate that they were getting a network built in the range of only between 40 and 65 feet, since other communities in Florida and Washington were getting 200 foot towers. Mr. Jung said that they had an exception process and until now the industry had not felt the need to use it with the possible example of the Apple height exception which was not viewed favorably by the Planning Commission, and which the applicant subsequently withdrew and proposed in a different configuration. He said they assumed through the master plan process that they could refine their criteria somewhat and be more specific about their needs, resulting in fewer exceptions. Com. Stevens said that the concept of bringing the TC to the Planning Commission and asking questions, is that the Planning Commission has been asked to approve various antenna installations and has been responding to public input on the height, possible safety implications, etc. and being that they are not a technical body, felt this should be considered by the TC. He said he wanted safety concerns to be addressed and publicly known, and wanted safe, consistent answers that have been reviewed and are not speculation. He said that height and aesthetics are also issues; height determined by the topography, in that there are hills and valleys and with wireless, there are areas that are not covered. He referred to an earlier comment that these issues were not unknown, that they were not politically or economically driven, but a scientific standard. He said it was proposed that the unknowns or scare factors be demonstrated and answered, so that the public could be rest assured. Because of the competition, several companies would be vying for particular locations, etc. He questioned consideration of using a single area or multiple antenna, a single antenna with a multiple transmission concept being reviewed, and have this as a city concept not as a reactionary; and lastly, who does the Planning Commission say yes to, and whose request is denied; is the FCC dictating or does the city dictate? He said the most important factor is that the community be rest assured of safety,, and their views not be obscured by antennas when not necessary. He said the aforementioned areas were where the Telecommunications Commission's expertise was needed. Mr. Piasecki said that one of the purposes of the study was to better understand the limits of authority, and the state and federal regulations imposed upon the limited cities. He said they did not have unlimited power and did not know if the answers to some of the questions were available, but would be empowered to try to answer them. Com. Stevens questioned whether the TC was the appropriate body to be the focal point for the City of Cupertino as the Planning Commission was looking for guidance since they felt they were not experts in the area. Planning Commission ~ utes 3 July 1 O, 2000 2. They have been restricted to non residential zone properties only. 3. When an applicant comes in with an antenna, they are asked to prepare a master plan for other future antennas to be built in the city. Occasionally, carriers come back revising their master plan, so it appears that technology, is evolving even faster than the carriers and the people they hired to permit them understand it. · 4. Visual simulation of what the antennas will look like is required. 5. Screening of the antennas as part of the design review process is required. Mr. Jung explained the difference of the master plan from the ordinance in effect. The ordinance is a reactive type of ordinance in that there is an application which is addressed based on the standards established in that ordinance relative to height, dimensions, and locations. It is not a plan for the future buildout of a wireless network, and does not for example, contemplate what this network would look with eight or nine carriers with their networks superimposed on each other. It does not anticipate the possibilities of co-locations in particular areas in the city. The' ordinance at this point does not address the potential incursions of antennas in residential areas, churches and also on other' public properties such as city parks, or even school sites. He said there are a number of other issues that can be addressed in the master plan that is not being satisfactorily addressed in the wireless communications ordinance. He briefly reviewed the objectives outlined in the staff report and the handout, including industry participation, map of appropriate antenna locations, policy development, outside expertise, public involvement, and cost recovery for planning. Mr. Guttadeauro explained the role of the Telecommunications Commission (TC). He said they were not planning on taking this on as a project as it was well beyond the scope of the TC; but they were willing to serve as an additional resource to staff as a subcommittee, with 2 of the 4 persons being available at any one time as a subcommittee to offer technical guidance. He emphasized they were not expert in the area of creating a master plan. He reported that the TC's purpose was to serve as a liaison between AT&T Cable and the city, and said when it was the Cable Commission, they were initially involved in reviewing the contract and making certain recommendations regarding both aspects for the city and DeAnza College which serves as the studio. He outlined the TC's involvement and role in utilizing the DeAnza facilities for public broadcasting, and educating the public and schools through grants. The TC charter was recently expanded to include ali telecommunications that Cupertino may be interested in, including wireless, such as DSL. Another goal is to promote more competition coming into Cupertino to benefit the residents by reducing their costs. They were initially involved in antenna applications by submitting their inputand getting their involvement started. Chair Harris questioned the scope of the rules, and the justification for granting permits for antennas. Mr. Jung said that the federal legislation is broad and expansive, and the federal authority did preserve a local zoning authority to site antennas, with the exception of some smaller ones for residential purposes, but for the most part the city retains its zoning authority to review the applications for certain range of issues, fairly inclusive of any other type of development in Cupertino, with one or two exceptions. He said relative to the access issue, he believed it was the federal intent that the city be accommodating in that they do not exclude carriers from providing coverage in Cupertino but still r~tain the zoning authority to decide where the antennas can be located. He said the master plan under discussion is only going to be discussing the wireless applications; none of the hard wired ones; it is more general than cell phones. It was stated that Planning Commission 1~ ares 6 July !0, 2000 Chair Harris questioned why it wouldn't be a function of the commission as a whole rather than a subcommittee, as part of their agenda. The members of the TC said it was a reasonable suggestion and would be considered at their next meeting. Com. Kwok suggested that the TC at their next meeting could discuss the scope of work for the consultants, the technical aspects, the policy aspects, and some of the areas outlined by staff and work with staffto see what is the best scope of work for the consultants to handle, and when the consultant is on board, steer them to come up with the final products. The TC could aisc provide expertise, assistance and comments in the best interest of Cupertino. Mr. Guttadeauro said their agenda was already finalized for the year, and since they were half way through the year, to take on such a scope would disrupt what they are already working on. He said they would consider the suggestions and would discuss it at their meeting and bring back a recommendation regarding the extent of their participation with the Planning Commission. Chair HarriS said that the TC could provide recommendations and their expertise and the City Council would take care of the policy issues. Information from other cities could be also be useful, to see what was successful and eliminate reinventing the wheel. Com. Doyle suggested that staff work with the TC to look at the best way to come back with a roadmap for the development of the program; is it more feasible to have it part of the regular agenda or have ~vo people working on the project separately for a month, six months, or a year? He said relative to what they were looking to accomplish, the major concerns were addressed, and he felt they should not attempt to identify potential technologies and legislate around those, but identify the main concerns, and what impacts they may have on what is allowed. If it is a safety issue, how would it impact the siting or the realities of' what would be imposed. That and the visual impacts are other issues, and there may be ~vo or three other ones that could be identified. Wben the new technology comes on board make certain there is some review or trip line that questions if it does meet the criteria from the past and if it is not safe, identify rights and limits, help characterize that, and have a means of creating lower and fewer exceptions or impacts. Co- location has been unsuccessful in the past; are there other elements that could bebrought forward, and make some synergies out of these, that may not happen by themselves. Mr. Jung distributed photo simulations and discussed various antenna locations. He addressed the community's perception about commercial intrusion onto the residential involvement with the placement of the antennae. He said he felt it was obtrusive; however, he was not certain how the community would react. Chair Harris suggested writing into the ordinance $ year reviews, and not allowing perpetual use, which would require them to choose the newer technology even if there is cost involved. Relative to commercialization, she .said it could also be conceived as a benefit to the residents in the community to have better cellular and wireless service, so they would be willing to sacrifice the aesthetics for the beneficial use. She said that in strictly residential areas without commemial locations, an ordinance is written allowing only in commercial locations, and the city may be keeping people from having that benefit in their part of town. She said she did not advocate it since she was concerned about safety as it was next to a park, where the children are; however, it is a balance, and the need and use has to be weighed against what the issues are. Com. Corr .likened it to an elephant in the picture, as there was discussion about bringing in services to the community, while ignoring the fact that there is a telephone pole in the middle with electrical wires at the top; and later the phone wires above where the proposed antenna is, together Planning Commission ! ates ~ July I O. 2000 Mr. Guttadeauro said they were asked to comment on the ordinance and did so, as well as accepting many suggestions; but being citizens as well, had similar concerns and questions, and would be willing to assist with whatever areas they specialized in. Com. Con' said from his standpoint if an application is received stating they need a tower a certain height, he questions whether they need that particular height or just want the specific height; the Planning Commission wants to be able to seek advice from the TC relative to thenecessary height for that particular antenna. He said he did not want unattractive antenna farms placed all around the city. Mr. Jung said he envisioned working with a subcommittee of the TC which would involve extra meetings. Mr. Piasecki said that the TC would be a sounding board for the Planning Commission to bring issues to them for their expertise and advice on whether or not it was the right direction to go in terms of a policy standpoint, and make recommendations which would be forwarded to the City Council. The industry participants would attend the meeting and explain their needs and goals and a consultant, if hired, would also attend the meeting and help shape a policy for the future. He said a Planning Commissioner could be assigned to the committee. Mr. Jung said that it need not be a complicated effort; but something simple and viewed as more of an educational process for the Planning Commission as well as staff, so that they could develop worthy policies and a good plan and map for the city. Mr. Tsui said that in the future, wireless technology will become more dominant and more people will have antenna requests which will require more coverage, and they need to work diligently in putting together a framework that can accommodate all types of wireless technology. He said the ordinance should be written to address future needs. Another member of the TC said that Mr. Jung had the foresight to seek help with one of the exceptions, since the relative questions had to be posed to the applicant, with an understanding of the answers. The TC recommended that Cupertino look at the overall picture. Pan of the goal of the TC is to increase the access to telecommunications in Cupertino, but at the same time remain aesthetically pleasing, and inform the public what some of the issues are, such as safety concerns with so many antennas in close proximity to residences. Most of the members of the TC have engineering backgrounds and can offer assistance in that area. He said that plans from other cities should be studied as well. The wireless industry is in the early stages of a boom in wireless communication, which is growing rapidly and will have a lot of force behind if there is no a plan to compare it to. The TC could assist in the industry participation to ensure honest dealings with policy development and be involved with public information to better inform the general public. He questioned the role of the TC in being able to look at other plans, and should a consultant be hired. Mr. Algeri concurred with the previous speakers, and said that Cupertino was a good candidate for an early deployment of wireless networking to the home, as it was indicated at a recent forum that they would not have DSL for one or two years, leaving cable as the only.high speed service. He said it needed to be viewed in a more global fashion, and those with engineering backgrounds could lend their expertise to keep the industry honest and on top of the table by their responses. They could assist on a part time basis to accomplish those things; and hire consultants to work on policy, which is their weak area. Planning Commission 1~ ~tes s July 10, 2000 Chair Harris closed the public input portion of the meeting. Com. Stevens commented that acronyms were ,useful to those familiar with them; however, for those who were not familiar with them, it might appear that the discussions were not accomplishing anything. He said he was aware of what Sutro Tower looked like, but also knew why it was built, and that is another alternative that should either be considered, denied or at least addressed; meaning that should we have a Sutro Tower or not; and if not, why, and put the question to rest. Chair Harris asked staffto return with a specific recommendation on how the process should work with the other committee, together with the two documents and the minutes; and a recommendation to be forwarded to City Council of how much money to request for the consultant. MOTION: SECOND: VOTE: Com. Doyle moved to continue Application 9-SP-00 to the July 24, 2000 Planning Commission meeting Com. Corr Passed $ -0-0 3. fiication Nos.: l-U-00, 2-EA-00 Pinn Brothers (The Adobe Inn Hotel) 20128 Stevens Creek Boulevard Use Perm Continued from June Tentative Cio and construct a 47,000 square foot, 77 room hotel. 'Commission meeting date: July 17, 2000 Staff presentation: construct a 47,000 square foot hotel. setback allowance are requested. resolution. The application was continued address the following issues: east side setbacks size of north and west entrances; mid-block front setback; sanitary sewer capacity; and attached staff report. Chair Harris asked for explanation The video reviewed the application to demolish a restaurant and the Heart of the City Specific Plan height and approval in accordance with the model the June 26th Planning Commission meeting to ibility of third level treilis;wainscoating band; access; perimeter landscaping; revision to location. The issues are outlined in the front setback revision issue. Mr. Jung discussed the correction to the drawings, which for a decrease in the front setback from 60 feet to 35 feet. He noted that the actual setback uilding to the face of curb was 45 feet. He pointed out that despite the increase in the setback,additional setback is still needed for the following reasons. There is cbncern about theof the building itself and its presence on Stevens Creek Boulevard as it is a tall building closer to the street than the podium and dominates the one story building to the south of it. said there was also concern about the ramping down to the garage itself. Modification needs made so that the trash collection can take place outside the garage with an increased setback, will provide a safe access out of the garage. He said he was requesting that an ASA rev Planning Commission h ires ? July I 0, 2000 with a transformer and cable, which are located throughout the neighborhoods, so if one can unobtrusively as indicated put one more technology on the existing elephant, it seems to work. He said it did not make sense to be so concerned about addi.ng a small box when all the other technology was already strung throughout the ne. ighborhood. Chair Harris said that she felt there was adequate direction, and she hoped that the TC would use their expertise to assist the city for the benefit of the community. She said they may decide to have a subcommittee that would meet and forward recommendations on, which would allow members'to work on the project and not become overburdened. In response to a question about the anticipated schedule, Chair Harris said she estimated 4 to 6 months. Com. Doyle said it would be beneficial if they could address the major considerations in safety and technical, and some of the considerations resulting from the first review, to alleviate the possibility of' doing something that puts people at risk, and to buy time until they have a more comprehensive process to utilize. Mr. Jung said he did not have a staging plan since part of the work requires an outside consultant. He said he felt it would not be too difficult to get outside input from the industry as materials were readily available to address the issues and there needs to be a steep learning curve, not only getting the industry information, but perhaps some presentations by an outside consultant to understand what the parameters are and how the concerns would fit in or conflict with the work parameters. Once educated, putting together a plan might not be such a difficult task, aside from the actual site locations. Chair Harris said there was an existing ordinance and it was not their intent to hold anything up whil~ the ordinance is revised; suggestions will be considered and a reasonable time allowed for the process; hire the consultant when the funds are available and in the meantime work on other things as outlined. Com. Stevens said that they were not asking for, or recommending, a policy or procedure for something they are not familiar with, but to identify.what is needed before the policy is developed that would be in the community's best interest. Com. Corr commented earlier that possible use of existing telephone poles and the like throughout the neighborhood should have the specter of trying to get rid of them and put them underground; therefore if it is decided that they can be put on an existing telephone pole, it indicates that the telephone should be there forever, which is not the concept. The basis rule and concern is safety, aesthetics and city boundaries. Chair Harris opened the meeting for public input. Mr. Chris Fowler, Cellular One, said that he acquires real estate for cell sites and understands what Cellular One is attempting with the master plan in Cupertino. He said they were built out in Cupertino except for two locations they are currently pursuing, and he said he felt that the west side of Highway 85 is lacking coverage and also the corner around Bollinger and Blaney is presently weak. He said there were presently six sites in Cupertino and two were missing according to the engineer's buildoutPlan. In response to a question about co-locating, Mr. Fowler said that it was dependent on frequency, who was brOadcasting at what frequency. He said that usage of cell phones was highest on high traffic roads with backup. Other characteristics to be included in the plan: 1. Articulated goals and policies 2. Mechanisms for getting colocation of facilities 3. Minimizing need for exceptions to standards 4. Mechanism for reviewing facilities on a periodic basis 5. Tiered Permitting 6. Recovery of costs of preparation Planning Process Assumptions. Staff also assumes that industry stakeholders and the public will be involved in the process and there is funding for outside expertise to help City staff and decisionmakers. The planning division is staffed below funding levels. There is an expectation that vacant positions will be filled before work proceeds. Plan Schedule. Once funding is approved for consulting services, staff expects the following schedule of tasks and timeframes. 1. Data Collection/Contracting for Services 1-1½ months a. Staff identifies and communicates with wireless industry to obtain information on buildout plans, types, functions and requirements of equipment, screening/stealthing techniques, · possible sites, industry trends, etc. b. Finalize contract for services with consultant. c. Consultant begins work d. Work program orientation for Telecommunications Commission 2. Site Selection and Mapping 2 months a. Staff distills industry information and does preliminary inventory of potential antenna sites and mapping, also preliminary evaluation of sites for appropriateness of wireless facilities. b. Staff performs reality cheek with consultant and industry contacts. 3. Commission workshops 1 month a. Staff holds 1-2 public workshops for Commissioners and public to transmit background information from staff and consultant, review/discuss antenna site inventory/map, facility oPtions, goals, policies. b. Staff obtains input from public and Commissioners to use in plan 4. Drafting Plan a. Staff drafts plan and revises map. b. Staff submits plan to consultant for review 1 -1 ½ months 5. Plan Review I month a. Staff submits draft plan to Telecommunications Commission for re. view and subsequent approval. b. Plan is forwarded to the Planning Commissi°n for public hearing. EXHIBIT B CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Agenda Date: July 24, 2000 SUBJECT: Proposed Work Program for a Wireless Communications Facilities Master Plan RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission: · Approve the proposed work program for the Wireless Communications Facilities Master Plan, · Approve a minute order to the City Council requesting a budget allocation for the work. BACKGROUND: On July 10, 2000, the Planning Commission (PC) and Telecommunications Commission (TC) held a joint meeting to discuss a scope of work for a wireless facilities master plan. The Planning Commissioners welcomed the participation of the Telecommunications Commissioners and proposed they take on the planning task since the PC felt they lacked the expertise to guide such a planning effort. The TC's original mission of advising the City on its cable TV franchise was expanded by the City Council to include all matters related to telecommunications. The TC said it could help in a technical advisory capacity, but felt it had no experience in plan development and was concerned about the time commitment. The Commissioners had numerous questions. Staff stated this was a new and developing area of planning and there were only a few examples of such a wireless plan to follow. Outside expertise was necessary. A couple of Planning Commissioners said their primary concerns were, in priority order, safety of residents from hazardous levels of radio emissions, aesthetics and functionality of the network.. The Commission directed staff to produce a specific program/schedule for plan preparation and a budget request for needed services and equipment. DISCUSSION: Plan Assumptions. Staff assumes the final product will be a wireless facilities master plan and map that meets the following main objectives: 1. Informs the public, decisionmakers and applicant what type of antenna can go where and under what conditions. 2. Takes into account the health and safety of residents from hazardous levels of radio frequency radiation consistent with federal authority. 3. Takes into account the aesthetic/visual concerns of the public by applying site design, stealth and screening techniques at appropriate levels to meet the needs of the community. 4. Takes into account the functionality of the carrier's network. 5. Conforms with federal regulations and provides a legally defensible foundation for denying a permit EXHIBIT C CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Agenda Date: July 10, 2000 SUBJECT: Proposed Scope of Work for a Wireless Master Plan and Information for Joint Meeting with Telecommunications Commission RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission discuss the contents of this report and approve the proposed scope of work for the Wireless Master Plan. BACKGROUND: The buildout of the wireless communication infrastructure is a fast-growing and fast-changing part of the communications industry. No one disputes the popularity and demand for wireless communications. While "cellular" telephones, which rely on analog technology, have been with us for about 30 years, the next generation of wireless, PCS, Personal Communications Services, which rely on digital technology, has emerged in the last five years. Both technologies rely on the deployment of antenna sites that receive and transmit wireless communications within a small geographic area, or cell. Cellular technology (carriers are Cellular One and GTE Mobilenet) uses fewer, taller, and more distantly spaced antennae than the PCS networks (Sprint PCS and Pac Bell Mobile Services), which are normally developed with shorter antenna poles, but larger nmnbers of cells (antenna sites). Other wireless communication providers operating in this area include: Nextel (not cellular or PCS, another technology), Melricom (wireless interact serv~.ces) and various paging companies. With the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) auctions of sections of the electromagnetic specmma in 1995 to PCS companies and the passage of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, local and county governments across the country experienced a large influx of applications for PCS communications facilities. In general, local agencies were ill-prepared to deal with the issues involving these facilities: height, aesthetics, safety concerns, neighborhood compatibility, cumulative effects, the meanings of legislative mandates, etc. Information is not readily available, except from industry "experts." Outside experts in radio frequency engineering and wireless planning are very few. The vast majority of experts work for one or more of the wireless carriers. Most communities have relied on existing zoning and environmental regulations to deal with any issues, other cities passed building moratoria, and a few, like Cupertino, adopted either an ordinance or design guidelines to specifically address these facilities. Cupertino's wireless communications facilities ordinance, like other zoning ordinances, is a reactive ordinance. That is, it reacts to an application for antenna development by stipulating appropriate setbacks, heights, numbers, concentration, conditions of approval and land uses. The ordinance is not a plan for future wireless facilities, much like the zoning code is not the general plan for the City's future land uses. Few wireless master plans have been prepared in the country, none locally. Staff has been in contact with jurisdictions that have such wireless plans and will Plan Preparation Timeline: 7 months Cost of Consultant Services. Kreines & Kreines, Inc. is a Northern California-based planning firm that has done pioneering work in the area of wireless communications planning for public agencies. Unlike most wireless communications consultants who work for the wireless industry, Kreines and Kreines is the only consultant staff is aware of that has extensive experience and works exclusively for public agencies (See Exhibit C). The firm's cost estimate for services is $25,600. This estimate includes the following services: Preparation of various technical memoranda on City authority to review health and safety issues, scope of authority to regulate wireless facilities, industry trends, evaluation of industry-provided information, defensible foundation for permit denial, mechanisms for obtaining collocation of facilities, periodic evaluation of facilities, cost recovery, market lease rates for facility sites. · Review draft plan and prepare memorandum on review. Meeting Attendance in Cupertino 2 meetings with staff 2 work sessions with City Commissions (4 hours each) 1 Commission public hearing · Telephone conferences with City Staff Staff also recommends that the Commission add a contingency amount of 15% of the cost to their budget request for unforseen costs and extra tasks required of the consultant, for a total budget request of $29,500. Kreines and Kreines state that plan preparation costs are recoverable and will show the City how to get reimbursed. Prepared By: Cohn Jung, Semor Planner ' Approved By: Steve Piasecki, Director of Cfmmunity Development Enclosures: Minute Order Exhibit A: Staff Report dated 7/10/00 Exhibit B: 7/10/00 Commission Meeting Minutes Exhibit C: Wireless Facilities Fact Sheet & Statement of Qualifications from Kreines & Kreines, Inc., Telecommunications Consultant G :planning/pdreport/pcdantplan3 Outside Expertise. While the City may not be hiring Kxeines and Kreines to prepare a wireless master plan, staff believes his perspectives, knowledge of federal legislation and industry trends would be invaluable in developing the plan. Staff recommends that Mr. Kreines be enlisted to help staff and commissioners on a limited basis for plan development. Public Involvement. The current review process for wireless facilities has generated little to no public controversy. Staff believes this is due to the fact that the facilities have been located in non-residential areas and adequately sited or screened from public view. As more antenna sites are added to Cupertino, it has become harder for applicants and staff'to "hide" such facilities because the best sites are already occupied. The City is experiencing a second wireless buildout wave and applicants are suggesting sites closer to residential areas which may generate controversy. Public involvement in master planning antenna sites will be important in future antenna buildouts to achieve community understanding, "buy-in," and decrease surprises to the community. Cost Recovery for Planning. Staff believes that the costs to prepare the plan is recoverable through application fees and should be investigated. Prepared By: Colin Jung, Associate Planner Approved By: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development G :planning/pdreport/pc/antplan 1 obtain copies shortly. All known plans have been developed with the assistance of Kreines & Kreines, Inc., consultants to cities and counties on wireless planning. Mr. Kxeines has previously quoted staff a price of $50,000 to prepare the master plan with staff assistance. DISCUSSION: Scope of Work for City Wireless Master Plan Industry Participation. The City needs the involvement of the wireless carriers in the planning process. Int~ormation is needed on: · the buildout plans of each carrier and their coverage objectives; · types of antennae, mounts, equipment, their functions, their appearance and requirements; · advances and trends in the industry and technology; their siting process; and · their experiences with collocation of facilities and how to make they work Map of Appropriate Antenna Locations. A key feature of the plan will be a map of appropriate locations for antenna sites, which will give the City an idea of what the ultimate buildout will look like with the overlapping networks of different carriers. The map should take into account the varying topography of Cupertino, surrounding land uses and the type of antenna mount that would be appropriate for a given location. The commission may wish to consider alternative sites to commercial, industrial and utility zoned properties, such as, · publicly owned lands, including parks, water tanks, landscape strips, street medians and other public rights-of-way. Commissioners may have noticed the Metricom antenna boxes on numerous light poles throughout the City. · Church properties .: · Unused Caltrans rights-of-way · School properties. (Staffhas notice wireless facilities on Fremont Union High School DistriCt properties outside of Cupertino) · P.G. & E. power poles and lattice towers in residential areas. The map can also identify areas and locations where it is definitely not appropriate to locate a particular type of antenna or any antenna at all. The plan/map should also recognize two other points: 1) that perhaps the most appropriate location for an antenna is outside the City and that the City should not be a "magnet" for antenna installations just because it has a plan for them, and 2) that the wireless carriers' concepts of adequate and satisfactory capacity and buildout may not be acceptable to the City in terms of the concentration, height or other feature of the antennae in a given area. Less than complete radio coverage and "capacity problems" may be more acceptable than another antenna. Policy DeVelopment. While the City already has a regulatory ordinance, its implementation, and the plan should be guided by a set of antenna policies. The Commission and staff have sufficient development experience to establish a policy framework for future antenna installations. Qualifications of Kreines & Kreines, Inc. The following is a list of telecommunications projects currently underway or recently completed by Kreines & Kreines, Inc. Preparation of Wireless Master Plans & Other Wireless Planning Documents · 'Wireless Guidance Package, City of Detroit, Michigan. · Wireless Guidance Package, Mid-America Regional Council (MARC), Kansas City, Missouri (a regional agency composed of 114 cities and 8 counties). · Wireless Master Plan, Alachua County, Florida. · Wireless Master Plan, City of Brentwood, Tennessee. · Wireless Master Plan, City of Irving, Texas. · Wireless Master Plan, City of Lakeland, Florida. · Wireless Master Plan, City of Wichita/Sedgwick County, Kansas. · Wireless Master Plan, Town of Smithtown, New York. · Wireless Planning Report, City of Bothell, Washington. · Wireless Planning Report, City of Santa Monica, California. · Wireless Policy, Village of Morton, Illinois. · Wireless Strategy, Village of Winnetka, Illinois. · Wireless Telecommunications Facility Business Plan, City of Fridley, Minnesota. · Wireless Telecommunications Policy, Albemarle County, Virginia. · Draft Wireless Master Plan, City of Medina, Washington. · Comprehensive Study of Suitable Sites for Personal Wireless Service Facilities, Town of Durham, New Hampshire. · Guidelines for Review & Approval of Antenna Arrays on Monopoles, City of Scottsdale, Arizona. · Siting Criteria, Cape Cod Commission, Massachusetts (a regional agency composed of 15 towns). · Siting Criteria, City of Gloucester, Massachusetts. Preparation & Review of Telecommunications Ordinances Alachua County, Florida City of Altamonte Springs, Florida City City City City City City City City City City City of Bothell, Washington of Gloucester, Massachusetts of Houston, Texas of Kissimmee, Florida of Oeoee, Florida of Pacifiea, California of Paradise Valley, Arizona of Port Townsend, Washington of Puyallup, Washington of Shoreline, Washington of West University Place, Texas Kreines & Kreines, Inc., 58 Paseo Mirasol, Tiburon, CA 94920, (415) 435-9214 e-ma#: mail~planwireless, com- web site: hffp://www, planwireless, com EXHIBIT Facts About Personal Wireless Service Facilities The following are some facts about personal wireless service facilities that the wireless carriers may not be telling you. Personal wireless service facilities can be provided in your community without the use of "towers." Kreines & Kreines, Inc. can tell you how personal wireless service facilities can be deployed in your community without tall "towers." The Federal Commtmications Commission (FCC) has licensed hundreds of carriers to provide personal wireless service facilities in the U.S. through an auction process that raised billions of dollars for the federal government. The FCC has plans for many more auctions. Kreines & Kreines, Inc. can estimate hoW many of these carriers may want to install personal wireless service facilities in your community. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 preserved local zoning authority for cities and counties throughout the U.S. Kreines & Kreines, Inc. will show you how your city or county can plan for (and profit from) the coming revolution in personal wireless service facilities. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 required the FCC to prepare guidelines for radio frequency radiation (RFR). Kreines & Kreines, Inc. will show you how your community can ensure that the personal wireless service facilities in your community will meet these guidelines. Cities and counties can deal with health and safety issues resulting from personal wireless service facilities. The FCC does not pre-empt you from obtaining data and Kreines & Kreines, Inc. can show you how. Your city or county can enact a moratorium on the approval of personal wireless service facilities to give your community time to plan. Call Kreines & Kreines, Inc. to find out about moratoria. Your city or county can deny an application for personal wireless service facilities. Kreines & Kreines, Inc. can show you what is required for a denial. Most successful carrier lawsuits are over improper denials. Your city or county can recover all of the money it spends on planning for and permitting personal wireless service facilities in your community (including the cost of consultants). Kreines & Kreines, Inc. prepares cost recovery plans that show your jurisdiction how it can be reimbursed. K.reines & Kreines, Inc. can provide your jurisdiction or agency with the information necessary to start planning (and stop reacting). "Kreines & Kreines, Inc., 58 Paseo MiraSol, Tiburon, CA 94920, (415) 435-9214 e-maih mail~planwireless, com- web site: http://www, planwireless, corn · City of Dana Point, California. · City of Detroit, Michigan. · City of Gloucester, Massachusetts. · City of Houston, Texas. · City of Irving, Texas. · City of Lake Forest, California. · City of Lakeland, Florida. · City of Pacifiea, California. · City of Paradise Valley, Arizona. · City of Port Townsend, Washington. · City of West University Place, Texas. · City of Wichita/SedgwiCk County, Kansas. · Hemando County, Florida · Indian River County, Florida. · James City/County, York County and the City of Williamsburg, Virginia. · King County, Washington. · Lake County Council of Governments, Painesville, Ohio (a regional agency composed of 11 jurisdictions). · Miami Valley Cable Council (a regional agency composed of 9 dries and 16 affiliates). · Mid-America Regional Council (MARC), Kansas City, Missouri (a regional agency composed of 114 cities and 8 counties). · Pennsylvania Planning Association. · Piedmont Environmental Council, Virginia. · San Juan County, Washington. · State of New Hampshire, Office. of State Planning. · Town of East Hampton, New York. · Town of Smithtown, New York. · Town of Weston, Massachusetts. Review of Personal Wireless Service Facility Leases · Puyallup Water District, Washington. Franchising & Revenue Potential from Telecommunications · Alachua County, Florida. · City of Oeoee, Florida. · City of Puyallup, Washington · Town of East Hampton, New York Speaker/Moderator on Telecommunications Planning for Cities & Counties at Major Conferences Ted Kreines, AICP, President of Kreines & Kreines, Inc. has presented at the following conferences: · National PCIA, Site Owners and Managers Association conference in San Antonio in San Antonio, 1999. Kreines & Kreines, Inc., 58 Paseo Mirasol, Tibumn, CA 94920, (415) 435-9214 e-mail: mail~planwimless, com- web site: http~.planwireless, com · Fauquier County, Virginia (for the Piedmont Environmental Council) · James City/County, York County and the City of Williamsburg, Virginia (in association with an engineering firm) · Johnson County, Kansas · Model Bylaw (Ordinance) Cape Cod Commission, Massachusetts (a regional agency composed of 15 townS). · San Juan County, Washington · Santa Barbara County, California · Town of Durham, New Hampshire · Town of Smithtown, New York · Village of Waite Hill, Ohio Expert Witness · For the Town of Durham, New Hampshire in Sprint Spectrum v. Town of Durham. · For the Town of Sturbridge, Massachusetts in Sprint Spectrum v. Town of Sturbridge. · For the Town of Reading, Massachusetts in Sprint Spectrum v. Town of Reading. · For the Town of Douglas, Massachusetts in Bell Atlantic v. Town of Douglas. · For the Village of Ridgewood, New Jersey in Sprint Spectrum v. Village of Ridgewood. Preparation of Telecommunication Facilities Applications, Review of Telecommunications Facilities Applications & Alternatives Analysis · Preparation of application for a co-located personal wireless service facility on a water tank for the Town of Durham, New Hampshire. · Review of AirTouch Application for the City of Scottsdale, Arizona. · Review of CellNet AMR system to be deployed by Puget Sound Energy, a public utility, for the City of Puyallup, Washington. · Review of Cellular & PCS Applications for the City of Medina, Washington. · Review of Cellular One Application for the Village of Oak Brook, Illinois. · Review of ESMR Cell Site for Johnson County, Kansas. · Review of Orange County, California 800 MHz tmnked public safety system. City of Cerdtos, California. · Review of Ram Mobile Data Cell Site for the Wheaton Park District, Illinois. · Review of US Cellular Application for the Town of Dublin, New Hampshire. · Review of US West New Vector application for the City of Lacey, Washington. Workshops & Training for Cities, Counties, State Agencies & Regional Agencies on Planning for Telecommunications · Alachua County, Florida. · Albemarle County, Virginia. · Appalachian Trail Conference (an organization responsible for management and protection of the Appalachian Trail, extending 2,100 miles from Maine to Georgia). · Astoria, Oregon · Cape Cod Commission, Massachusetts (a regional agency composed of 15 towns). · City of Bothell, Washington. · City of Brentwood, Tennessee. · City of Daly City, California. Kreines & Kreines, Inc., 58 Paseo Mirasol, Tiburon, CA 94920, (415) 435-9214 e-ma#: mail~planwireless, com- web site: http://vvww, planwireless, com Kreines & Kreines, Inc. Wireless Planning Clients Counties, Cities & Towns National, State & Regional Agencies Special Districts Arizona. Cities of Paradise Valley & Scottsdale. California. Cities ofCerritos, Daly City, Dana Point, Lake Forest, Pacifica, Santa Monica & County of Santa Barbara. Florida. Cities of Altamonte Springs, Ocoee, Lakeland & Kissimmee. Counties of Alachua, Hernando & Indian River County. Illinois. Villages of Morton, Winnetka & Oak Brook. Kansas. City of Wichita, Sedgwick County & Johnson County. Massachusetts. Town of Weston & City of Gloucester. Michigan. City of Detroit. Minnesota. City of Fridley. New Hampshire. Towns of Dublin & Durham. New York. Town of East Hampton & Town of Smithtown. Ohio. Village of Waite Hill. Oregon. City of Astoria. Tennessee. City of Brentwood. Texas. Cities of Houston, Irving & West University Place. Virginia. City of Williamsburg. Counties of Albemarle, James City/County & York. Washington. Cities of Port Townsend, Lacey, Shoreline, Medina, Bothell & Puyallup. Counties of King & San Juan. Appalachian Trail Conference. The Appalachian Trail Conference is an organization responsible for management and protection of the Appalachian Trail, extending from Maine to Georgia. Kansas & Missouri. Mid-America Regional Council (composed of ! 14 cities and 8 counties). Massachusetts. Cape Cod Commission (composed of 15 towns). National Association of Telecommunications Officials and Administrators. New Hampshire. Office of State Planning. Ohio. Miami Valley Cable Council (composed of nine cities and 16 affiliates) & Lake County Council of Governments (composed of 11 jurisdictions). Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Planning Association. Texas. Texas Association of Telecommunications Officials and Administrators & North Central Texas Council of Governments. Virginia. Piedmont Environmental Council & Citizens for Fauquier County. Illinois. Wheaton Park District. Washington. Puyallup Water District. Kreines & Kreines, Inc', 58 Paseo Mirasol, Tiburon, CA 94920, (415) 435-9214 e-mail: mail~planwireless, com- web site: http://www, planwireless, com · National CTIA (Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association) conference in P~tlanta, 1998. · NATOA (National Association of Telecommunications Officials and Administrators) conferences in St. Louis and Tacoma, 1997. · TATOA (Texas Association of Telecommunications Officials and Administrators) conference in San Antonio, 1997. · State of New Hampshire Planning and Zoning Conference, 1997. · "Wireless Buildout" conferences in San Diego, Chicago, Colorado Springs, San Antonio and San Francisco, 1996-97. · North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) in Dallas, 1996. , CTIA (Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association) conference in New Orleans, 1996. Telecommuting Studies · Telecommuting Study, San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), San Diego County, California. Other Telecommunications Projects · Publisher of PlanWireless (formerly Wireless Update), a monthly newsletter sent free to thousands of cities and counties throughout the United States on telecommunications planning. Articles on Telecommunications Planning for National or Statewide Publications Kreines & Kreines, Inc. has provided articles on wireless planning for magazines published by the following organizations: · New York State AssoCiation of Towns. · League of Oregon Cities. · Missouri Municipal League. · West Virginia Muni~cipal League. · Kansas Municipal League. · American Planning Association. · International City/County Managers Association. Awards for Telecommunications Projects · The City of Lakeland Wireless Master Plan has received an Award for Excellence from thc Florida American Planning Association. · The Siting Criteria and Model Bylaw (Ordinance) prepared for the Cape Cod Commission have been nominated for an American Planning Association award at the national level and an American Planning Association award from the State of Massachusetts. Kreines & Kreines, Inc., 58 Paseo Mirasol, Tiburon, CA 94920, (415) 435-9214 e-mail: mail~planwireless, com- web site: http://www, planwireless, com Expert Witness & Planning Advisor to Attorneys Publications Urban and Regional Planning lecturer, San Jose State University. Expert witness in Sprint Spectrum v. Town of Durham, New Hampshire. Expert wimess in Sprint Spectrum v. Town of Sturbridge, M~. Expert witness in Sprint Spectrum v. Town of Reading, M~. Expert witness on Growth Control Ordinance in Glascock v. Novato. Advisor to Pebble Beach Company regarding general plan adequacy of housing development site. Advisor on EIR adequacy for steel plant in Northern California. Advisor on general plan and EIR adequacy in two Northern California cities. Advisor on baTardous waste cleanup at existing shopping center in Northern California. Ted Kreines is the only consultant to ever be invited to speak before the Land Use Section of the California County Counsels' Association. Author of numerous environmental assessments, environmental impact reports, economic development strategic plans, general plans, general plan amendments, feasibility studies, specific plans, Wireless Master Plans, special area plans, and jobs/housing reports. A list of publications is available upon request. ~ Kreines & Kreines, Inc., 58 Paseo Mirasol, Tiburon, CA 94920, (415) 435-9214 e-maih wireless, updatet~.worldnet, att. net web site: http://www, infinitefaculty, corn/planwireless Ted Kreines, AICP President Academic Background Memberships/ Registrations Experience Teaching Experience Master of Arts, Communications, Annenberg School, University of Pennsylvania. Master of City Planning, University of Pennsylvania. Bachelor of Science in City Planning (Honors), University of Illinois. Registered Environmental Assessor, California EPA. American Institute of Certified Planners. American Planning Association. California Association for Local Economic Development. Past Director of the Northern Section of the American Institute of Planners. Past Vice President of the California Planning Roundtable. Past Member of the Town of Tiburon Board of Adjustments and Review. Past Director of the Tiburon Hills Homeowners Association. President, Kreines & Kreines Inc., Environmental & Telecommunications Planning Consultants, 1980 to present. Principal, Ted Kreines, Environmental & Planning Consultant, 1974- 80. Senior Associate, EDAW, Inc., Environmental & Planning Consultants, 1973-74. Director of Development, Newfields New Community, Ohio, 1972- 73. The Rouse Company, Hartford, Connecticut, 1970-72. Candeub, Flessig and Associates, Planning Consultants, 1966-70. Peace Corps Volunteer, Tunisia, 1964-65. Strategic Planning Course, University of California, Davis Extension Program. Land Use Planning lecturer, County Counsels' Association, Land Use Section, Urban and Regional Planning lecturer, University of California, Berkeley. ~ Kreines & Kreines, Inc., 58 Pasco Mirasol, Tiburon, CA 94920, (415) 435-9214 e-mail: wireless, update@worldnet, att. net web site: http://www, infinitefaculty, corn/planwireless CITY OF CUPE INO City ttall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3223 FAX: (408) 777-3366 www.cupertmo.or§ OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK SUMMARY Agenda Item No. ~..~ Meeting Date: August 21, 2000 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Appointment to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee. BACKGROUND This is an informal committee consisting of seven members with no specific terms. The group meets on the third Thursday of each month at 7:30 p.m., and the staff liaison is Traffic Engineer Ray Chong. Their focus is on bicycle and pedestrian transportation issues, and the committee advocates projects and programs that promote safe biking and walking in the community. RECOMMENDATION: Accept the recommendation of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee and appoint Mr. Phillip George Underwood. Submitted by: Kimberly Smit~ City Clerk Approved for submission: David Knapp City Manager Prtnted on Flecvcled Paper Here are some letters of recommendation from Kreines & Kreines, Inc. clients. TOWN OF OURHAA4 15 NE1/VMARKET ROAD DURHAM, NH O~B24-2~B Te1: ~5571 F~: ~572 ~R~T~~ T~ 17. 1998 FRIDLEY M~L~AL CE~l'r~l · MI ! IJN~'~ry AV~. N I: FpJIX.E~ hGI ~L13 · (6 i~) j't i .3450, G.X (~.12) S-/1.1217 October ~.2, lgg8 To Whofll it Idly CCxIoI~: ~em. Ba~am Dec,/. NCP (612) 572.3~0 Please let us know if you would like copies of additional letters of recommendation. CITY OF CUPEP TINO dUL 2 3 2000 City Hall, City Clerk's Office 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408)???-3223 Fax: (408) 7??-3366 Website: www.cupertmo.org APPLICATION FOR ADVISORY APPOINTMENT (Last (First) ADDKESS: (Middle) TODAY'S DATE: HOME PHONE: 2_~'7 - ~ ~ I BUS. PHONE: E-MAIL: ~k;I.. ~ ~.c_~. ! HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN A RESIDENT OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO?: ~'~ ~ OCCUPATION: ~-~-'35'~-~ / ?~-%+,~-~ -~,~ ~-1-~-5 EDUCATION (Circle highest year completed): 7 8 9 10 11 12 Sr. College College ~_~Smdy~ Name of School Major Years/Credit High Schbol pr..l~.iraro.. H,',~,a ~ ~..v~b'~h,~, ..~ J~or College ~2 ~ U~versi~ u~'~'~. · ~ ~.~.,~.~"~'t~,~ -- ~~~~ ~ C~ ~) Business~rade School ~ O~er Tm~g U } ~ PROFESSIONAL LICENSES OR REGISTRATIONS: ON WHICH ADVISORY COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES, OR BOARDS WOULD YOU LIKE TO SERVE? (LIST IN ORDER OF PREFERENCE. LIST NO MORE THAN TWO): 2?-3' PLE..ASE LIST YOUR QUALIFICATIONS FOR TI-HS PosmoN?: CITY OF City Hall 10300 Torte Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3354 FAX: (408) 777-3333 Cupertino Bicycle And Pedestrian Advisory Committee July 26, 2000 SUBJECT: .CUPERTINO BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Councili The Cupertino Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee recommends the advisory appointment of Philip George Underwood to our committee. Mr. Underwood has faithfully attended our monthly meetings. He has offered useful input on the draft Pedestrian Transportation Plan. He is an avid bicyclist and walker who will promote integrated transportation in Cupertino. Ch~.~f~ktfully Su~nitted' ~' Printed on Recycled Pa¢er CITY OF CUPEi TINO City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3220 FAX: (408) 777-3366 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUMMARY Agenda Item No. ,~ t SUBJECT AND ISSUE Meeting Date: July 17, 2000 Aug. 21, 2000 Cupertino Community Services (CCS) Affordable Housing Loan. 1. Receive report on Council Action of February 1, 1999, or 2. Consider making a $1.6 million grant to CCS for affordable housing BACKGROUND In February 1999, the City Council approved $1.6 million in funding towards the CCS affordable housing project on Stevens Creek Boulevard. The minutes from that meeting document this as a loan (attachment 1). The intent, as staff understood, was for an interest free loan to be paid back once the project makes money, but not longer than the life of the property lease (57 years). We did not anticipate any payback of funds for 20-30 years, and it is possible that the entire amount of the loan may not be paid back under this scenario. This type of arrangement is typical for affordable housing funds to provide a recycling of the monies which can then be utilized on multiple projects. We have been approached by CCS and their consultants, Bridge Housing, requesting that Council continue this funding as a loan. In addition, Charles Kilian has provided the attached memo to clari fy the lease terms as to taking possession of the property and completion of the project. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the $1.6 million earmarked for CCS be provided as a loan to recycle monies lbr future projects. If Council prefers to provide the $1.6 million to CCS as a grant, action may be taken to do so. Submitted by: Director of Administrative Services Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager Pnnted on Flecvcled Paoer ARE THERE ANY SPECIALJNTERESTS OR ACTIVITIES THAT YOU WISH TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CITY COUNC, IL? (THI~SE NEED NOT BE DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE APPOINTMENT THAT YOU~'(E S'EEK.ING.) DO YOU HAVE ANY OBLIGATIONS THAT MIGHT ATTENDANCE 'AT SCHEDULED EVENING MEETINGS? AFFECT YOUR REGULAR IF YES, PLEASE EXPLAIN: IF YOU ARE NOT SELECTED AT THIS TIME, MAY WE KEEP YOUR APPLICATION ON FILE FOR A ONE (1) YEAR PERIOD FOR CONSIDERATION SHOULD A COMMISSION VACANCY OCCUR? ~ ~ THE SPACE BELOW IS PROVIDED FOR ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS THAT YOU MAY WISH TO MAKE ABOUT YOURSELF OR THE POSITION BEING SOUGHT. Signaturd All information provided on this form becomes a public record. Applicants appointed to the Fine Arts Commission, Housing Committee, Parks and Recreation Commission, Planning Commission, and Telecommunications Commission will be required to file statements of Economic Interest, which are also a public record. ~ ~_q'_/ Submit by U.S. Mail or in person to Cit~ of Cupertino, Clerk's Office 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 ~Cf~ of Cupertino City of Cupertino _.0500 Torte Avenue ' Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777.$$08 FAX (408) 777-3333 Commullity Development Department Housing Services Summary Agenda Item No. ~ Agenda Date: February_ 1, 1999 Subject: Request by Cupertino community Services (CCS) for $1.6 million from city's Affordable Housing Fund to be used for site identification, development and construction of affordable rental units. Discussion: Cupertino Community Services and BRIDGE Housing Corporation have submitted the attached request for funding. The agencies are requesting $1.6 million to be used for site identification, development and construction. If the project remains on schedule, the agencies will gain site control within the next six months and construction would begin in one to two years. Planned for a yet to be identified site are affordable rental units serving the low and very low income and new office space for Cupertino Community Services. The application request is for the city to merely commit the funds to the project. Loan terms and a loan agreement will be forwarded to the council at a later date for final approval. The commitment will enable the agencies to secure additional funding and assist in the negotiations to purchase property. Once site identification and control have been achieved, the agencies may approach the city for further funding as well as development approvals. Staff is supportive of the agency's request. However, since the new office space does not meet funding guidelines for the affordable housing fund, staff is requesting that the office space construction and site acquisition costs be reflected on the pro-forma with alternative funding sources covering those costs. The alternative funding sources should also be reflected on the pro- forma. Staff also remains concerned about the amount of funding the city would be providing. In addition to the $1.6 million, the city may have to provide $1.3 million in additional funds. The funding source for the additional funds has not been identified. Primarily, staff is not comfortable with utilizing the general fund as the source of the $1.3 million in gap funding. Although the city could provide a "bridge" loan, using the general fund as the source, staff recommends the agencies explore utilizing local trust funds, the Federal Home Loan Bank's Affordable Housing Program and a capital fundraising campaign as potential funding sources. A capital fundraising campaign could serve two purposes: raising the funds necessary to cover the cost of land and construction for the office space and fostering community involvement in the development. Cupertino Housing Committee Review: At its January 14, 1999 committee meeting, the Cupertino Housing Committee reviewed the request for funding. On a 3-0 vote, the committee recommended the Council approve the funding request with the caveat that the agencies be restricted to $500,000 in predevelopment funds during the fn'st year. The committee also agreed with staff's recommendation that as much CDBG February 1, 1999 Cupertino City Council Page 11 Ms. Lydia Tan with Bridge Housing Corporation said they expect the project to cost around $4 million. They will apply to the county CDBG program and the county home program. The city will provide $1.6 million, and there is a shortfall of about $1.3 million, of which some can be hard debt. The gap would probably be $1.3 million at the highest or $200,000 dollars at the lowest, depending on land cost and how much CCS can borrow. James said that the city really wants to do something with affordable housing, and there is very little risk because they are merely setting aside money to help CCS market the project. James moved to adopt the Cupertino Housing Committee recommendation that the city council loan Cupertino Community Services and Bridge Housing Corporation $1.6 million from the city's Affordable Housing. Fund. These funds shall be used for site identification, development, and construction. However, only $500,000 shall be used for predevelopment activities during 1999. Furthermore, as much CDBG funds as possible shall be utilized for the loan with the remainder coming from the BMR in-lieu portion of the Affordable Housing Fund. Statton seconded and the motion carried 5-0. ORDINANCES 20. Second reading and enactment of Ordinance No. 1806, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Amending Chapter 11.24.150 of the Cupertino Municipal Code Relating to the Establishment of Parking Prohibition Along Certain Streets, East Side of De Anza Boulevard From the Northerly City Limits to Bollinger Road." The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. Bumett moved and Statton seconded to read the ordinance by title only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the second reading thereof. Motion carried 5-0. Bumctt moved and Statton seconded to enact Ordinance No. 1806 Motion carried 5-0. 21. Second reading and enactment of Ordinance No. 1807, "An Ordinance of thc City Council of thc City of Cupertino Adding Chapter 2.08.096 to thc City's Ordinance Code Adopting a Process for Reconsideration." The City Clerk read the title of the ordinance. Burnett moved and Statton seconded to read the ordinance by rifle only, and that the City Clerk's reading would constitute the second reading thereof. Motion carried 5-0. Bumett moved and Statton seconded to enact Ordinance No. 1807 Motion carried 5-0. Memo TO: Carol Atwood, Director of Administrative Services FROM: Charles T. Kilian, City Attorney Affordable Housing Lease DATE: August 16, 2000 In February of this year, the City Council executed a 57-year lease with the County Board of Supervisors and the County Fire Department for the premises located on Vista Drive to be used for an affordable housing project. The City is obligated under the lease to pay cash in the amount of 1.15 million dollars and to transfer property (valued at $650,000) located at 21000 Seven Springs Parkway to the Fire Department as a one-time rental payment. Possession of the property is to be delivered to the City no later than February 28, 2001. The above-described payment and transfer are due in advance upon the taking of possession by the City. The lease provides that the City shall "prosecute diligently to completion" the construction of the project and shall complete construction by 24 months after possession. The City may transfer its interest in the lease without consent of the County to Cupertino Community Services or Bridge Housing Corporation. Upon transfer of the lease, the City has no further fight or obligation regarding the lease. A transfer to any other affordable housing organization will require consent from the County. If you have any questions, please call. cc: Dave Knapp funds as possible be utilized for the development, with the remaining funds to come from the BMR in-lieu fee portion of the Affordable Housing Fund· This serves the purpose of reserving approximately $250,000 of the federally unrestricted BMR in-lieu fees for use in a silent second mortgage program currently being considered by the committee. Reeom_raendation: The Cupertino Housing Committee recommends the City Council loan Cupertino Community Services and BRIDGE Housing Corporation $1.6 million from the city's Affordable Housing Fund. These. funds shall be used for site identification, development and construction. However, only $500,000 shall be used for predevelopment activities during 1999. Furthermore, as much CDBG funds as possible shall be utilized for the loan with the remainder coming from the BMR in- lieu fee portion of the Affordable Housing Fund. Submitted by: · Cowan Director of Community Development City 191an~ er Attachments: Funding Request from Cupertino Community Services Ms. Mary Ellen Cheil Augmt L 2000 Page Two ttepuyment obligmions, lfthe City ~ ~ p~ov~ m ~ form ora g~t. ~tc ~ to ~ City. In ~, ~e ~ fl~ f~m ~ ~,j~ would ~en ~ available m Iow~ ~ or to ~ C~:S ~it~. Hoover, ~ a~t~lity, ~ fun~ mil likely ~ el~m~ ~ t~ Co~ty of~ CI~ ~ ~t~ent ~ ~ l ]OMC ~d CDBG ]o~x 'l'hc I~e ca~h flow ~v~cs of a Ci~ ~ ~uld aot ~ ~i~ fitr ~y y~ umil ~ HOME ~ CDBG f~s ~ ~id. Competitiveness [bt Other 1.~undmg ,~;ources. ~ ~ding ~u~. t~ F~I Hm~ Lo~n B~ Afli,~bte Ho~i~ Pr~. wU! a~ ~di~o~l ~ts ~ pmj~t~ wh~ l~d ~u~fion i~ I'~ by a b~c H~ever, as we have di~us~ this ~.~ d~ not ~m~c ~11 Iht MW ~ in a ~m~ of ~r c~gone~, ~ ~ aw~ is ~ikcly even wi~ a ~t ~ ~ Ci~ For I~. ~ ~tiomd ~An~ ~ given for g~ts uM~ ~r ~ S~e HCD fu~ing pmgt~ or t~ Ct~y of San~ Clam Trmt F~ ~. Given 1:hat the advantag~ ol'u grant are m~t overwhelming nad that t,nmvin~ing the Council lo provide a grant wtmld be diflit;ult, wg ~ tim thc currant surpi~n crab/forgivable kan aline'turn I~ maintained. If, in tho I'utur~, the fn'oject's ci~cumsumces chengc and th~-r~ are mm'e distinct advantages to the grant structure, thc r~qtm.~t c~n ~g made at n Inter date. City Fi~in_~ I)urirm Con_.~'uetion As v~ utso discus.md on M~ay, ~ way Io ~m ~ ~oj~t'$ ~ ~ m ~ow nd~tion~ I'u~s ~nm the City during t~ ¢onsm~i~ ~fi~. IJsing ~ inte~-f~ Ui~ ~ during eon~titm will rove the ~t~ ~a~n~ ~t would o~ ~ i~u~ ~th a ~ns~ct;on I~. If m ~ ~,0~ is ~vi~ by ~ C~ for ~ c~ction ~M, over $75,~ in int~ ea~ ~ll ~ mv~ un l~ 501(c)(3) ~md s~o. ~is i; a ~gnific~t ~v~ md is ~ely ~vi~blc in h~y's ~~ of r~g in~st ~ ~ ~nst~tion costq. I Iowcver, thc inter~ mvmg~ tm the CHFA Help Loaa aeemu-io is n~ ~ ~fi~t a~ in ~ 501(c~3) ~o. 'l~s is ~u~ t~ CI U;A Help 1.,~ ~ ~ in~ ~ of only 3%. While ~ing ~ City's ~ in~ ~ ~ld ~ill ~ ~f~ble, ~ ~vings ~y not ~ signifi~u om~h ~o ~c it ~,nh k~i~ to ~l to ~st ~difio~l constmcfi~m ~ri~ l~in~ We s~l w~ting u~l a d~iAon ~ ~ m~e a~ut 0?'4-7 BRIDGE I II Ms. Mary Ellen Cheil Cupordno Community Servi~e~ Cupertino, CA 95014 RE: City of ~.'.tqaertino l:unding l.~ar Mary Ellen: i'*olh~wing up on our me~tintls on Mondny. wc arc writing m ~n~ our tma~t~diflg t',l't~ t~s tbr t~ Cily ofC~iz~ ~nding, di~ ~ ~t I~ i~s~. di~ns tl~ opti,n of ~ing City lh~i~ du~ co~t~tion, and ~ti~ ~h~ ~,'urrunt City o£Cur~rtin~Commitrmsa3 As clarilh,-d in our m~ting wilh Ihe (:il3, ofCupertim, staffon Mortality. th~ curr~m c~-nmitm,.-m from the City to thi~ lnroj~ct is lbr a $1.6 million loan at 0% interest, nqn6d on a ~rplu~ ~sh bltsis ovvr a .~5-ycar tenn. We un&.n'~tand that irthe loan is not complmeiy repaid ~ thc ~nd of thc tenn it will be ~';givcn. 'l'h~ terms shtmld be clearly documemod in th~ project',~ loan aLmeemcnt~ whh thc City. CiripTt ot Loan We have been di.~*us'aing whether or m~ the City's funds should be provided in xhe form of a grant or a Joan. Hascd un ~nu' conv~,nsati0n with .nt,'d¥on M~mda~y, it .neems thai the turret npprtwed form al'the loan provides many offlte udvuntnlFs t~fn grant. It dloe~ m,t h-ave n payment obligation nt tho end of Ih~ temp. it dm~s not hmit out ability to borrow ~mvemional d~ht be~u.~ paymcn~ an~ m,~e -n a surplu.,~ cash bn.~s, and it does not incn.-.,ne thc pm}~! e,o~t.~ because vie inlC~tC~l rotc is zcm. 'l'he twu ren~ining ndvnntq~e~ of a grant vcrsu.~ Ionn are l) l~ams I~tve no ongoJn~ pa~m~,nv, oblil~ti~m~ and 2J th~ grant m~y inerea.~ file I~Ojc~t's ~mpetltiven~.-n.n with uther fimding sout~e.~ Howe~o', oven th~.~ 'advanta~u.~ are mimmal aa dcsc~ihecl below: CITY OF CUPFi INO City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 FAX (408) 777-3333 Summary PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 4,5 AGENDA DATE August 21, 2000 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Amendment to Chapter 14.05, Park Maintenance Fees and Chapter 18.24, Dedications and Reservations BACKGROUND Submitted is an amendment to the current park fee ordinances. Currently, the City has two park dedication ordinances. One is a subdivision ordinance, Chapter, 18.24, relating to subdivisions and the other is a park maintenance fee ordinance, Chapter 14.05, relating to single lot development. The single lot park fee excludes a payment if a legal dwelling unit exists. This follows the intent of the ordinance in that existing residences already use the park and, therefore, need not pay for additional parks. Therefore, lots containing the dwelling units are not required to pay a park fee when remodeling or a new structure is being built on the property. In contrast, the Subdivision Map Act is silent on this matter, and the City has been collecting park dedication fees on property even though it may have had existing dwelling units. Proposed Ordinance The proposed amendment makes both ordinances consistent and follows the intent of park dedication ordinance in that only developments that increase park demand by increasing population should be assessed a park fee. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council conduct the first reading of Ordinance No. 1853, amending Chapter 14.05, Park Maintenance Fees. L~ector of Pu~ic Works Ap~ov~ed ~r submission: David W. Knapp City Manager M~ MaO' i~llcn (.'.hull A~t 8. :2000 P'~e '1 hru~ Next Steps As cte~ribed above, w~ recommend not rcquestint~ that Ow City',~ commitment o1' $! .6 rn~tti~m bc chant~'d t~ a grant at this time. Wc al.~ recommend waiting to pursue additiurra] construction period financing l¥1nvt thc City uatq the primary financ;ng is F~'~u~; tbu CI IF^ Help Loan se~ms t~> b~ thc mt~t advantageous For t~¢ pn,ject and fr~r thc City. wc think this scenario sbuuld bc iave~tigatud morc thuroushiy. We wili c~mtinuc to di~uss the ~ terms, timing, c~mpetiti~,ene~s with C]IFA. We should al.~ make a l~,rmal rcqaest to City a~;dl' lo consider this lundin& option. Maybe thc C. uncii c,~n ~ms~dor the item at their September m~'ti~. In addition, we think we shoukl begili disc,z~.*~itlg the i~m~e o~' the cash II~w split with the (:it),, the Couaty ',md thc other jurisdictions. We can bo1~n these di~.tmaiom; m~¢c tho primary financing scenario ~S cslahli~hecl. Pleuse I~,~t u~ know ~fyou b~ve thoughts or questiorm about any of rbe~e items. ! I~ok I~r~rd lo talking with you seen. ~k~cercly, Ann Silverberg D~recmr of Real I"~ale Oeveloprnem Lydia Tm~ TOTAL I~. 04 Ordinance No. 1853 INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 21 st day of August, 2000 and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this day of ,2000, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino ORDINANCE NO. 1853 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO AMENDING CHAPTERS 14.05 AND 18.24 TO CLARIFY PARK MAINTENANCE AND DEDICATION FEES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS." Section 1 - Amendment to Chapter 14.05 Section 14.05.010 is hereby amended to read as follows: 14.05.010 Definitions B. "Erection" or "construction" as used in this Chapter is established where a new residential building or structure is built upon a parcel of land, within all zones permitting residential uses. This definition does not apply to any remodel of an existing residence or any replacement of an existing residence where said existing residence was demolished within one year prior to the application of permit of the replacement residence. Section 2 - Amendment to Chapter 18.24 Section 18.24.1.15 is hereby added to Chapter 18.24 to read as follows: Where any lot or lots of a proposed subdivision contains existing residential units, a credit shall be given against the requirement of land dedication or payment of fees in lieu thereof for each lot which contains said residential unit or units. As used herein, the term "existing" refers to a residential unit or units which exist at the time of the recordation of a final map or which were demolished within one year prior of the tentative map application. Section 3 - Publication Clause The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to be published at least once in a newspaper of general circulation published an circulated in the City within 15 days aRer its adoption, in accordance with Government Code Section 36933, shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance and her certification, together with proof of publication, to be entered in the Book of Ordinances of the Council of this City. CITY OF CUPE INO City. Hall 10300 To/re Avenue Cupertino, CA 9501 -3255 Telephone: (408) 777-3220 FAX: (408) 777-3366 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUMMARY Agenda Item No. ~ 6 Meeting Date: August 21, 2000 SUBJECT AND ISSUE Fiscal Year 2000/01 Revised Capital Improvement Program 1. Receive report revising the 2000/01 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) based on Council discussions on August $, 2000. BACKGROUND The Council adopts the first of a five-year Capital Improvement Program each year in conjunction with the annual budget. This June, Council adopted the CIP pending a work session review on reserves and each project. Based on this work session, Council proposed a revised CIP program for the fiscal year 2000/01 (Attachment A). Subsequent to this study session, Council Member Bumett has proposed an alternative to the project list. The proposal eliminates the Stevens Canyon Road widening project for $2.1 million and utilizes these funds for various other traffic needs. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council formally adopt the attached project list as discussed at the study session. If Council prefers to utilize the $2.1 million on other proposed projects, discussion and action may be taken to do so. Submitted by: · / "~ Carol A. Atwood Director of Administrative Services Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager Pnnted on F~ecvcled Paper Description Prior Fund Approval Proposed Five Year Capital Improvement Program 2000-01 2001.02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Not Funded 9100 420-9108 420-9115 560-9112 420-9116 280-TBA TBA TBA TBA Parks/Trails Park Renovation Program Skate Park Blackberry/McClellan Ranch Master Plan San Thomas/Saratoga Trail Improvement Portal Park Expansion Stevens Creek Trail Master Plan Study Union Pacific RR Trail Feasibility/DeAnza McClellan Ranch Park Immprovement Ongoing 50,000 100,000 350,000 100,000 15,000 125,000 400,000 150,000 2,350,000 20,000 3,400,000 200,000 Total 50,000 735,000 125,000 0 400,000 0 5,950,000 92OO 420-9216 560-9105 420-9219 420-9220 420-9221 TBA 420-9222 TBA Buildings Service Center Expansion 250,000 160,000 Blackberry Farm Improvements Ongoing 175,000 175,000 175,000 200,000 225,000 Animal Control Facility 500,000 Varian Park Restroom Facility 0 Sports Center Building 1,300,000 Council Chairs 0 Library 2,000,000 20,000,000 Community Gymnasium 150,000 5,000,000 2,000,000 Total 250,000 4,135,000 20,175,000 175,000 200,000 225,000 7,150,000 9300 420-9315 TBA TBA Medians and Overpasses Torre Avenue Median Rainbow (De Anza to Stelling) Stevens Creek Blvd Specific Plan 0 700,000 950,000 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,650,000 RESOLUTION NO. 00-225 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO ADOPTING A REVISED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 00-189 on June 19, 2000, which adopted an Operating and Capital Improvement Budget for Fiscal Year 2000-01; and WHEREAS, at a City Council workshop on August 8, 2000, the City Council discussed the CIP budget and concurred to make adjustments to specific items; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby adopt Resolution No. 00-225 amending the CIP budget for 2000-01, as shown in Attachment A. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this ~ day of~ 2000, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: Kimberly Smith City Clerk John Statton Mayor, City of Cupertino CITY OF CUPEPxTINO City, Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA t)$Ol ~-~,255 Telephone: (408) 777-3220 FAX: (408) 777-3366 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUMMARY Agenda Item No. o~ ~ Meeting Date: August 21, 2000 SUBJECT AND ISSUE General Fund Reserves 1. Receive report formalizing a General Fund Reserve policy based on Council discussions on August 8, 2000. BACKGROUND The City maintains a general fund reserve level for economic uncertainty, disaster preparedness and Capital .Improvement Project (CIP) reserves. The current policy requires 75% of general fund annual expenditures and one year of debt service payments to be kept in reserve. On August 8, the City Council discussed the components of this reserve and adequate levels for each component. Council agreed to the following: ,/ Economic Uncertainty - maintain 8-10% of general fund operating expenditures, or approximately $2.5 million. ,/ Disaster Preparedness - maintain $7.5 million. ,/ CIP base - maintain $5 million for acquisition of land for future city use. ,/ CIP 5 year funding plan - transfer all excess reserves over the $15 million noted above and general fund net income each year to the CIP fund for appropriation of current and future capital improvement projects. RECOMMENDATION Staff reCommends that the Council formally adopt the above policy for the general fund and CIP reserves. Submitted by: Carol A. Atwood Director of Administrative Services Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager Pnnted on Recycled Paper Fund Description Prior Approval Proposed Five Year Capital Improvement Program Not 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 Funded 9400 270-9435 TBA 270-9443 270-9444 270-9445 270-9446 270-9430 TBA TBA TBA TBA TBA TBA TBA Streets Neighborhood Traffic Calming Measures Mary Avenue Bollinger Rd Bike Facility Improvement Bubb/McClellan Intersection Modification Traffic Signal Hardware Upgrade DeAnza/Stev Creek Crosswalk Enhanc. Stevens Canyon Road Widening Foothill Blvd/Voss Signal Replacement Enhanced Walkway in Unimproved Areas Foothill Blvd Bike Lanes Imperial Avenue Cul-De-Sac Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge McClellan Rd (Orange to Linda Vista) McClellan RdlStelling to DeAnza Total Total Capital Improvement Program 100,000 175,000 1,000,000 35,000 180,000 236,000 50,000 0 120,000 1,100,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 370,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 160,000 400,000 740,000 2,500,000 1,000,000 1,275,000 1,871,000 300,000 225,000 75,000 75,000 5,170,000 1,575,000 6,741,000 20,600,000 400,000 675,000 300,000 19,920,000 CITY OF CUPE INO City Hall 10200 Torte Av~nu~ Cupertino, CA 95014-3255 (408) 777-3354 FAX (408) 777-3333 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT AND ISSUE Summary AGENDA DATE Bid Opening - Fuel Tank Replacement, Project 2000-104 ~ugust21,2000 BACKGROUND The following is a summary of bids received for the referenced project: Bidder Bid Amount Technology, Engineering & Construction, Inc. $154,500.00 Bid Bond Yes The City has received only one bid, and it is considered to be a reasonable bid on the basis of the City's engineer's estimate of $142,000.00. Normally, the City hesitates to award to a sole bidder, but in this case, due to the market condition, it is advisabl6 to proceed and award to the sole bidder. The City is mandated to replace the fuel tank at City Hall. This project is estimated on the basis of current knowledge. We are not anticipating any surprises as far as contaminants in the soil, but we must be prepared to face that if any are encountered. Due to the close proximity to the City Hall HVAC intake, it is necessary to perform the excavating, which includes the removal and placing of the new tank, during Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The budget amount is $169,750.00 STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the City Council award the project to the sole bidder, Technology, Engineering & Construction, Inc., for the amount of $154,500.00, and authorize a 9% contingency for a total project of $168,405.00. Sub i b · Attest as to bids received: Director of P~lic Works City Clerk Approved for submission: David W. Knapp City Manager ORDINANCE NO. 1850 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CUPERTINO VALLCO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cupertino (the "City Council") has received from the Cupertino Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") the proposed Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Cupertino Vallco Redevelopment Project (the "Project"), a copy of which is on file at the office of the Agency at 10300 Torte Avenue, Cupertino, California, and at the office of the City Clerk at 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California, together with the Report of the Agency to the City Council on the proposed Redevelopment Plan, including: (1) the reasons for selection of the Project Area; (2) a description of the physical and economic conditions existing in the Project Area; (3) a description of specific projects proposed by the Agency in the Project Area and an explanation of how the proposed projects will alleviate the conditions existing in the Project Area; (4) the proposed method of financing redevelopment of the Project Area, including an assessment of the economic feasibility of the Project and an explanation of why the elimination of blight and redevelopment of the Project Area cannot be accomplished by private enterprise acting alone or by the City Council's use of financing alternatives other than tax increment financing; (5) an analysis of the Preliminary Plan for the Project; (6) the Report and Recommendations of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino (the "Planning Commission"); (7) the Final Environmental Impact Report; (8) a summary of consultations with affected taxing agencies; and (9) an Implementation Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reported that the Redevelopment Plan conforms to the General Plan of the City of Cupertino and has recommended approval of the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Agency prepared and circulated a Draft Environmental Impact Report (the "Draft EIR") on the Redevelopment Plan in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15000 et seq.), and environmental procedures adopted by the Agency pursuant thereto, and the Draft EIR was thereafter revised and supplemented to incorporate comments received and responses thereto, and, as so revised and supplemented, a Final Environmental Impact Report (the "Final EIR") was prepared and certified by the Agency; and WHEREAS, the Agency and the City Council have reviewed and considered the Final EIR on the Redevelopment Plan and have determined that, for certain significant effects identified by the Final EIR, mitigation measures and a monitoring program therefore have been required in or incorporated into the Redevelopment Plan which avoid or substantially lessen such effects; and Ordinance No. 1850 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Agency and the City Council have each adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations for the remaining significant effects identified by the Final EIR which cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance; and WHEREAS, the City Council and the Agency held a joint public hearing in the City Council Chambers, 10300 Torte Avenue, Cupertino, California, on June 19, 2000, to consider adoption of the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, a notice of said hearing was duly and regularly published in The Cupertino Courier, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Cupertino, once a week for five successive weeks prior to the date of said hearing, and a copy of said notice and affidavit of publication are on file with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, copies of the notice of joint public hearing and a statement concerning acquisition of property by the Agency were mailed by first-class mail to the last known address of each assessee of each parcel of land in the proposed Project Area as shown on the last equalized assessment roll of the County of Santa Clara; and WHEREAS, copies of the notice of joint public heating were mailed by first-class mail to all business owners or operators within the proposed Project Area; and WHEREAS, copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed by certified mail with return receipt requested to the governing body of each taxing entity which receives taxes from property in the Project Area; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Report of the Agency, the Report and Recommendations of the Planning Commission, the Redevelopment Plan, and the Final EIR; has provided an oppommity for all persons to be heard and has received and considered all evidence and testimony presented for or against any and all aspects of the Redevelopment Plan; WHEREAS, written objections to the Redevelopment Plan were received at the noticed public hearing and, although none of the written objections were from an affected taxing entity or property owner in the Project Area, the City Council elected to adopt written findings in response to the written objections received; and WHEREAS, all actions required by law have been taken by all appropriate public bodies; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the purpose and intent of the City Council with respect to the Project Area is to accomplish the following: (a) the establishment, by effective use of the redevelopment process, of a planning and implementation framework that will ensure the proper, long-term development of the Project Area; (b) the elimination and prevention of the spread of blight and deterioration, and the conservation and rehabilitation of the Project Area in accordance with the Ordinance No. 1850 WHEREAS, the Agency and the City Council have each adopted a St"~m¢ Overriding Considerations for the remaining significant effects identified by the Fina ,*,' cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance; and WHEREAS, the City Council and the Agency held a joint public hearing in thc Council Chambers, 10300 Torte Avenue, Cupertino, California, on June 19, 2000, to co: adoption of the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, a notice of said hearing was duly and regularly published in The Cup Courier, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Cupertino, once a week fo successive weeks prior to the date of said hearing, and a copy of said notice and affida publication are on file with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, copies of the notice of joint public heating and a statement conct acquisition of property by the Agency were mailed by first-class mail to the last known ac of each assessee of each parcel of land in the proposed Project Area as shown on th equalized assessment roll of the County of Santa Clara; and WHEREAS, copies of the notice of joint public heating were mailed by first-class n all business owners or operators within the proposed Project Area; and WHEREAS, copies of the notice of joint public hearing were mailed by certified with return receipt requested to the governing body of each taxing entity which re :s from property in the Project Area; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Report of the Agency, the Repo~ Recommendations of the Planning Commission, the Redevelopment Plan, and the Final Ell provided an oppommity for all persons to be heard and has received and considered all evi and testimony presented for or against any and all aspects of the Redevelopment Plan; WHEREAS, written objections to the Redevelopment Plan were received at the nc public hearing and, although none of the written objections were from an affected taxing em property owner in the Project Area, the City Council elected to adopt written findings in res' to the written objections received; and WHEREAS, all actions required by law have been taken by all appropriate public bc NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO I HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the purpose and intent of the City Council with respect to the P Area is to accomplish the following: (a) the establishment, by effective use of the redevelol process, of a planning and implementation framework that will ensure the proper,, long development of the Project Area; Co) the elimination and prevention of the spread c :gl deterioration, and the conservation and rehabilitation of the Project Area in accordan~,~ wi Ordinance No. 1850 Page 3 City's General Plan, specific plans, and local codes and ordinances; (c) the replanning, redesign, and redevelopment of underdeveloped or poorly developed areas that are underutilized or improperly utilized; (d) the strengthening 6f the economic base of the Project Area by the redevelopment and rehabilitation of structures and the installation of needed site improvements; (e) the promotion of new private sector investment within the Project Area to facilitate the revitalization of an important commercial center; (f) the elimination or amelioration of certain environmental deficiencies, such as insufficient off- and on-street parking, and other public improvements, facilities and utilities deficiencies adversely affecting the Project Area; (g) the Creation and development of local job opportunities and the preservation of the existing employment base; and (h) the provision, by rehabilitation or new construction, of improved housing for individuals and/or families of low or moderate income within the City limits. Section 2. The City Council hereby finds and determines that: (a) The Project Area is a blighted area, the redevelopment of which is necessary to effectuate the public purposes declared in the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.). This finding is based upon the following facts, as more particularly set. forth in the Report of the Agency to the City Council: (1) The Project Area is predominantly urbanized; (2) The Project Area is characterized by and suffers from a combination of blighting physical and economic conditions, including, among others: buildings which are substandard in design and are functionally obsolescent; buildings of inadequate size; buildings with inadequate access and circulation; lots of irregular form and shape and of inadequate size for proper usefulness which are under multiple ownership; depreciated or stagnant property values and impaired investments, evidenced by a decline in retail sales, decline in assessed property values, high vacancy levels, and an inability to attract significant retail tenants; and (3) The combination of the conditions referred to in paragraph (2) above is so prevalent and so substantial that it causes a reduction of, or lack of, proper utilization of the Project Area to such an extent that it constitutes a serious physical and economic burden on the City which cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise or governmental action, or both, without redevelopment. (b) The Redevelopment Plan will redevelop the Project Area in conformity with the Community Redevelopment Law and in the interests of the public peace, health, safety, and welfare. This finding is based upon the fact that redevelopment of the Project Area will implement the objectives of the Community Redevelopment Law by aiding in the elimination and correction of the conditions of blight; providing for planning, development, redesign, clearance, reconstruction, or rehabilitation of properties which need improvement; improving, increasing, and preserving the supply of low- and moderate-income housing within the community; providing additional employment oppommities; and providing for higher economic utilization of potentially useful land. Ordinance No. 1850 Page 4 (c) The adoption and carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan is economically sound and feasible. This finding is based on the facts, as more particularly set forth in the Report of the Agency to the City Council, that under the Redevelopment Plan the Agency will be authorized to seek and utilize a variety of potential financing resources, including tax increments; that the nature and timing of public redevelopment assistance will depend on the amount and availability of such financing resources, including tax increments generated by new investment in the Project Area; and that no public redevelopment activity will be undertaken unless the Agency can demonstrate that it has adequate revenue to finance the activity. (d) The Redevelopment Plan is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Cupertino, including, but not limited to, the housing element, which substantially complies with state housing law. This finding is based upon the finding of the Planning Commission that the Redevelopment Plan is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Cupertino. (e) The carrying out of the Redevelopment Plan would promote the public peace, health, safety, and welfare of the City of Cupertino and will effectuate the purposes and policy of the Community Redevelopment Law. This finding is based upon the fact that redevelopment, as contemplated by the Redevelopment Plan, will benefit the Project Area by correcting conditions of blight and by coordinating public and private actions to stimulate development and improve the physical and economic conditions of the Project Area. (f) The condemnation of real property, as provided for in the Redevelopment Plan, is necessary to the execution of the Redevelopment Plan, and adequate provisions have been made for the payment for property to be acquired as provided by law. This finding is based upon the need to ensure that the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan will be carried out and to prevent the recurrence of blight, and the fact that no property will be acquired unless the Agency can demonstrate that it has adequate revenue for the acquisition. (g) The Redevelopment Plan will not result in the temporary or permanent displacement of any occupants of housing facilities in the Project Area and, therefore, will not result in the need to relocate occupants of housing facilities or to ensure the availability of comparable replacement dwellings. This finding is based on the fact that there are no housing facilities currently located in the Project Area. (h) There are no noncontiguous areas of the Project Area. (i) Inclusion of any lands, buildings, or improvements in the Project Area which are not detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare is necessary for the effective redevelopment of the entire area of which they are a part; and any area included is necessary for effective redevelopment and is not included for the purpose of obtaining the allocation of tax. increment revenues from such area pursuant to Section 33670 of the Community RedeveloPment Law without other substantial justification for its inclusion. This finding is based upon the fact that the boundaries of the Project Area were chosen as a unified and consistent whole to include all properties contributing to or affected by the blighting conditions characterizing the Project Area. Ordinance No. 1850 Page (j) The elimination of blight and the redevelopment of the Project Area could not reasonably be expected to be accomplished' bY private enterprise acting alone without the aid and assistance of the Agency. This finding is based upon the facts, as more particularly set forth in the Report of the Agency to the City Council, that because of the higher costs and more significant risks associated with development of blighted areas, individual developers are unable and unwilling to invest in blighted areas without substantial public assistance and that funds of other public sources and programs are insufficient to eliminate the blighting conditions. (k) The Project Area is a predominantly urbanized area as defined by subdivision (b) of Section 33320.1. This finding is based upon the facts, as more particularly set forth in the Report of the Agency to the City Council, that all of the properties within the Project Area have been or are developed for urban uses and are an integral part of an area developed for urban uses. (1) The time limitations in the Redevelopment Plan, which are the maximum time limitations authorized under the Community Redevelopment Law, are reasonably related to the proposed projects to be implemented in the Project Area and the ability of the Agency to eliminate blight within the Project Area..This finding is based upon the facts that redevelopment depends, in large part, upon private market forces beyond the control of the Agency and shorter time limitations would impair the Agency's ability to be flexible and respond to market conditions as and when appropriate and would impair the Agency's ability to maintain development standards and controls over a period of time sufficient to assure area stabilization. In addition, shorter time limitations would limit the revenue sources and financing capacity necessary to carry out proposed projects in the Project Area. Section 3. In order to implement and facilitate the effectuation of the Redevelopment Plan, certain official actions must be taken by the City Council; accordingly, the City Council hereby: (a) pledges its cooperation in helping to carry out the Redevelopment Plan; (b) directs the various officials, departments, boards, and agencies of the City of Cupertino having administrative responsibilities in the Project Area likewise to cooperate to such end and to exercise their respective functions and powers in a manner consistent with the Redevelopment Plan; (c) stands ready to consider and take appropriate action on proposals and measures designed to effectuate the Redevelopment Plan; and (d) declares its intention to undertake and complete any proceeding, including the expenditure of moneys, necessary to be carried out by the City under the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. Section 4. The City Council is satisfied that written findings have been adopted in response to the written objections received at the noticed public hearing. Having considered all evidence and testimony presented for or against any aspect of the Redevelopment Plan, the Council hereby overrules all written and oral objections to the Redevelopment Plan. Section 5. The mitigation measures, as identified in Council Resolution No. 00-187, adopted on July 17, 2000, and Agency Resolution No. RA-00-06, adopted on July 17, 2000, making findings based upon consideration of the Final EIR on the Redevelopment Plan, are incorporated and made part of the proposed Redevelopment Plan. Ordinance No. 1850 Page Section 6. That certain document entitled "Redevelopment Plan for the Cupertino Vallco Redevelopment Project," a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and attached hereto, is hereby incorporated by reference herein and designated as the official "Redevelopment Plan for the Cupertino Vallco Redevelopment Project." Section 7. The City of Cupertino Building Department is hereby directed for a period of at least two (2) years after the effective date of this Ordinance to advise all applicants for building permits within the Project Area that the site for which a building permit is sought for the construction of buildings or for other improvements is within a redevelopment project area. Section 8. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Agency, and the Agency is hereby vested with the responsibility for carrying out the Redevelopment Plan. Section 9. The City Clerk is hereby directed to record with the County Recorder of Santa Clara County a notice of the approval and adoption of the Redevelopment Plan pursuant to this Ordinance, containing a description of the land within the Project Area and a statement that proceedings for the redevelopment of the Project Area have been instituted under the Community Redevelopment Law. Section 10. The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a copy of the description and statement recorded pursuant to Section 9 of this Ordinance, a copy of this Ordinance, and a map or plat indicating the boundaries of the Project Area, to the auditor and assessor of the County of Santa Clara, to the governing body of each of the taxing entities which receives taxes from property in the Project Area, and to the State Board of Equalization within thirty (30) days following adoption of this Ordinance. Section 11. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to certify to the passage of this Ordinance and to cause the same to be published once in The Cupertino Courier, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Cupertino. Section 12. If any part of this Ordinance or the Redevelopment Plan which it approves is held to be invalid for any reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance or of the Redevelopment Plan, and this City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of this Ordinance or approved the remainder of the Redevelopment Plan if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted. Section 13. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. Ordinance No. 1850 Page 7 INTRODUCED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino the 17th day of July, 2000, and ENACTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino on the 21 st day of Agusut 2000, by the following vote: Vote Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: APPROVED: City Clerk Mayor, City of Cupertino