ArboristReport-StaufferLn.pdfJohn J. Leone, Certified Arborist
4361 Carol Ave.
Fremont, CA 94538
rborjohnWol,com
Satya Dasari; sadasari mail.com
c/o Lot 190
Tract 7993 Stauffer Lane
Cupertino, CA
Ph., 408-666-6331
John J. Lam, Cerfified
Arborist
March, 2017
Mr. Satya Dasad
Lot 190
Tract 7993 Stauffer Lane
Cupertino, CA
Re: Stauffer Lane, Cupertino, CA
Dear Satya Dasari,
4361 Carol Avenue
Fremont, CA 94536
510/657-3299
510-449-3654 cell
AfthohnLaaol.com
Enclosed is the Arborist Report for the trees located at the above referenced property in Cupertino, CA. Thank
you for giving me the opportunity to assist you with your project. Should you have any questions, or require any
additional information, please contact me at my cell number 510/449-3654. Again, thank you for the opportunity
to assist you.
Sincerely.
John J. Leone
Intemational Society of Arboriculture
Western Chapter, Certified Arborist, W.E.1056A
John J. Leone; Fremont, Ca A Certified Arborist 1NE #10-%A
Stauffer Lane, Cupertino, CA
March, 2017
Purpose
At the request of Satya Dasari, I prepared an Arborist Report for the trees located at the
above referenced property. This report is for the purpose of a completing an inventory of all
applicable and/or heritage trees on the site. This report includes plotting their locations on
the site plan as well as the following elements: tree comments page, photographs, site
layout plan, Tree Appraisal Values, Tree Protection Guidelines, and a Glossary of Terms. In
addition, a Tree Chart is included that provides the full botanical name, common name,
measurement of diameter at base height (DBH), approximate canopy measurement, a brief
description, preservation rating, and overall condition of the trees.
Field documentation
* I arrived at the proposed construction site, on March 9th, 2017, located at the enclosed
address in Cupertino, CA. The weather was calm, dry and warm, with clear skies.
* I made all my inspections and observations, noting the trees and their condition at the
location and given the time of year, and the lack of any maintenance on the trees if
applicable.
* All measuring devices used for report documentations are approved by the International
Society of Arboriculture and the American Society of Consulting Arborists.
* A Nikon digital camera was used for taking photos of the trees, either individually or in
groups.
* The trees are tagged with a silver dollar sized disc and corresponding numbers to follow
the chart. My Certified Arborist number is engraved on each disc along with a
corresponding tree number to follow in the report.
John J. Leone, Fremont, Ca A Certified Arborist WE #1056A
Stauffer Lane, Cupertino, CA
March, 2017
Structure and Health Condition Comments
While the following trees are not heritage trees, some of the trees could provide aesthetic
value, historic significance, and interest to the new project:
b Tree # 1 through tree # 5: Quercus agrifolia, Coast Live Oak. All the Oak trees are
California Native trees and could possibly be incorporated into the new landscape scheme
for the proposed home site. The Oak trees are randomly located on the property and have
grown in a natural setting and form. All the Oak trees on the site have multiple main stem
trunks, with twigs and branches extending to the ground level. The Oak trees on the site
have not been maintained, pruned, or trimmed since they have germinated. The Oak trees
exhibit good vigor with a new flush of green spring growth, and display no sign of disease,
infestation, nutrient or moisture deficiencies, decay or other damage. All of the Oak trees
have some dead twigs and branches present at the time of my inspections.
A Tree #6 through 9: Peach species, which are remnants of a previous orchard in the
area. All trees are in poor condition and have extensive decay present throughout the
canopy and main branch structure. These orchard trees have no preservation or appraisal
value.
John J. Leone, Fremont, Ca. A Certified Arborist WE #1056A
Stauffer Lane, Cupertino, CA
March, 2017
Reasons for Tree Removal
o Construction- Excessive construction impact is unavoidable and it is not worthwhile
to save the tree.
Condition: The tree may have poor structure, low vigor, or have potential structure
failure issues.
Landscaping: Tree is being removed because it does not fit in with or conflicts with a
proposed new landscape scheme.
• Species: The tree may be considered a poor species.
Risk: The tree presents a moderate or extreme risk or potential hazard to people or
the property around it.
Rating Trees on the Charts
Excellent These trees are in unusually good health and condition. The trees are free of
disease, infestations, structural defects, moisture, or nutrient deficiencies. Excellent
trees are usually aesthetically pleasing, high quality species, or in a highly visual location.
Good: These trees may have a few minor defects or their conditions may require some
kind of professional attention. Usually with some minor work, the trees can be improved
and will thrive. Good trees may require a small amount of pruning, a few broken limbs
might be present, or may need other treatment. They may provide some benefit to the
location site or the environment.
Fair. • This categorizes a majority of average trees. They may have a combination of
problems and issues which include structural defects, combination of deficiencies, or
general health problems. Fair trees may also include a poor choice of tree for the given
location or site. These trees may require horticultural management to try to save them,
or could be considered for removal.
Poor: This category is for trees which have severe defects, health, and structural defects.
Trees which are poor will usually decline regardless of proper care or extensive
treatment to improve its general health and condition. This classification may also qualify
as a poor choice of tree species in a given landscape or environment which has or will
have a great potential for being a liability or nuisance. Trees classified as poor are
recommended to be removed and replaced with a more aesthetically pleasant species
where people and property are considered.
John J. Leone, Fremont, Ca. A Certified Arborist WE #1056A
Stauffer Lane, Cupertino, CA
March, 2017
Certification of Performance
I, John J. Leone, Certify,
-That I have personally inspected the trees and the property referred to in this report, and
have stated my findings as accurately and to the best of my ability.
-That I have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or the property that is the
subject of this report, and have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties
involved.
-That the analysis, opinions, and conclusions stated herein are my own, and are based
on current scientific procedures and facts.
-That my analysis, opinions, and conclusions were developed and this report has been
prepared according to commonly accepted Arbodcultural practices.
-inspections were performed visually only, and I do not assume responsibility for defects
or deficiencies that could only be discovered by probing, coring, excavating, or
dissecting.
• I do not provide a guarantee that problems or deficiencies on trees inspected may not
arise in the future.
-This report has been prepared exclusively for the use of the contracting, developing, or
municipal agencies and parties, and may not be copied partially or in total without prior
written consent.
further certify that I am a member of the Intemational Society of Arboriculture and a
Certified Arborist with the organization. In addition to these facts, I have been involved in the
practice of Arboriculture and the care and study of trees and landscape since 1977.
John J. Leone
I.S.A. Certified Arborist # WC 1056A.
John J. Leone, Fremont, Ca. A Certified Arborist WE #1056A
Stauffer Lane, Cupertino, CA
March, 2017
Limiting Conditions Accompanying Arborist Reports
This report requires no laboratory assessment of either the soil or plant and tree tissues.
The inspection is limited to visual examination only without excavation probing, coring or
"Resistograph" tools.
• This report is specific to the identified client prepared for, as well as the unique identified
site, the address enclosed. Although some of the principles here discussed might appear
to be applicable to another site, tree or situation, it is not possible to effectively carry any of
these ideas across to another scenario or site.
If the circumstances surrounding this report turn to a legal forum, then this report and
could be brought into legal testimony or court appearances only with a new assignment
covered by additional fees.
Alteration of this report, intentionally or unintentionally, voids the entire report.
® Sketches, photographs, and any other graphics used in this report are intended solely as
visual aids. Every attempt is made to limit distortions and to provide graphics realistic
enough for the purposes of this report. If engineering accuracy is important to any user of
this report, then professionals skilled in the particular discipline must be retained to provide
that level of detail.
Arborist Disclosure Statements
Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a
tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand, only
speculate. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below the ground. Arborists
cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a
specified period of time.
Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training, and experience
to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees, and
attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. Clients may choose to accept or disregard
the recommendations of the arborist, or to seek additional advice.
® Treatment, planting, pruning, and removal of trees may involve considerations beyond the
scope of the arborists services such as property boundaries, property ownership, site
lines, disputes between neighbors, and other issues. Arborists cannot take such
considerations into account unless complete and accurate information is disclosed to the
Arborist.
John J. Leone, Fremont, Ca. A Certified Arborist WE #1056A
Stauffer Lane, Cupertino, CA
March, 2017
■ An arborist should then be expected to reasonably rely upon the completeness and
accuracy of the information provided.
■ Trees can be managed but, they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept
some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate
the trees completely.
References
Richard Harris; 1992 Arbor Culture — Integrated Management of Landscape Trees, Shrubs
and Vines, Second Edition, Prentice Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
International Society of Arboriculture, Western Chapter
American Society of Consulting Arborists
Bay Area Landscape Supervisors Forum
Sunset Western Garden Book; copyright 2001
Master Gardner Program, U.C. Extension Program, Santa Clara County
Species Classification and Group Assignment; Guide for Plant Appraisal, 9th Edition,
published by the International Society of Arboriculture.
John J Leone, Fremont, Ca A Certified Arborist WE #1056A
Stauffer Lane, Cupertino, CA
March, 2017
Tree and Root Protection Guidelines
During construction, root protection is essential to the survival and safety of any
established trees.
41 A written agreement should be made between the developer and the construction
company with a clear understanding and procedure of these guidelines.
fo It is highly recommended a Certified Arborist be hired by the construction company or
the developer, to do periodic inspections of preserved trees. The protection
practices must remain in place in order to insure the survival of the trees during and
after the construction process.
® Driving vehicles and equipment, or stacking materials under the drip line of trees is
prohibited. Heavy activity under the drip line will cause compaction, and
compromise the health of the tree; thereby causing the tree to eventually perish. The
drip line starts at the edge of the branches of the tree.
Install a substantial non movable root zone protection fence (i.e. chain link fence) to
protect the roots, trunk, and branches of the trees to be preserved within the
construction zone. The fence must extend to the drip line or outer edge of the
branches of the tree. Stakes to the fence need to be secure: driven into the ground
or cemented 24 inches into place until construction is complete.
■ Periodic inspections of the protective root zone fencing are necessary by an
International Society of Arboriculture, Certified Arborist, to insure the survival of the
tree during construction.
• Absolutely no soil grade changes should occur in the root zones or drip line of the
trees. No piling of soil or scraping of soil should occur within the drip line or at least
12 feet from the trunk of the tree.
Store soil intended for later use in piles located well outside of the root zones of trees
to be preserved.
® Cutting of buttress roots is to be prohibited, as it can cause instability with the
structure of the tree. Buttress roots are located directly under the bark flare at the
bottom of the tree.
Cutting of branches more than 1 inch in diameter must be done by a bonded and
insured tree maintenance company with a Certified Arborist on staff.
John J. Leone, Fremont, Ca. A Certified Arborist WE #1056A
Stauffer Lane, Cupertino, CA
March, 2017
Cutting roots over 3 inches in diameter must be done under the supervision of a
Certified Arborist. Using a pruning saw to make clean cuts will encourage
compartmentalize and heal properly, without causing decay.
e When trenching, tunnel under roots larger than 3 inches in diameter.
Large roots exposed by excavation must be covered with burlap and kept damp to
keep them from drying out. Trenching and shredding large roots within the drip line
of the tree increases the chances of tree instability and mortality.
Washing of paints, solvents, or concrete materials within the drip line of the tree must
be prohibited. A concrete washout must be provided. Paints, solvents, and concrete
residues are toxic to plant materials and will cause them to decline or die.
John J Leone, Fremont, Ca. A Certified Arborist WE #1056A
Stauffer Lane, Cupertino, CA
March, 2017
Glossary of Terms
Aeration - Providing oxygen to the root system.
Branch Bark Ridge — A ridge of bark that forms in the branch crotches, where they meet, as
specialized tissue of the branch and trunk. The bark ridge usually turns upward.
Caliper— Diameter of trunks or trunk at 4 feet 5 inches above the ground level.
Critical root zone — The root system of a tree that is generally considered to be within and
under the drip line of the crown of the tree. It is the portion of the root system that is the
minimum necessary to maintain the vitality and stability of the tree. Encroachment or
damage to the critical zone will put the tree at risk of failure.
Crown — The full complement of branches, twigs, and leaves of a tree -
Decay —
ree_Decay— Changes over time of a host tree by a decay organism that results in the
breakdown of tissues, wood, and bark, which can cause the tree or its parts to become
weak.
Decline — A general loss of vitality over the entire tree caused by a disease or by a series of
events that disrupt essential life processes such as too little water, too much fertilizer,
improper pruning, soil compaction, or chemical pollution.
Drip line — The area under the canopy of a tree that is equal to the total branch spread.
Dieback— Death of shoots and branches, generally from the tip to the base.
Exotic Tree — Tree not native to California.
Included Bark— Pattern of development at branch junction where bark is turned inward
rather than pushed outward.
Mulch — Wood chips or green waste used to hold in moisture and regulate the temperature
of the soil.
Native Tree — Tree indigenous to California.
Root System- The portion of the tree containing the root organs, including buttress roots,
transport roots, and fine absorbing roots; all underground parts of the tree.
John J. Leone, Fremont, Ca. A Certified Arborist WE #1056A
Stauffer Lane, Cupertino, CA
March, 2017
Root Zone -The area and volume of soil around the tree in which roots are normally found.
May extend to three or more times the branch spread of the tree or several times the height
of the tree.
Suppressed — Trees that have been overtopped, and whose crown development is
restricted.
Tree protection zone — A designated area around trees where maximum protection and
preservation efforts are implemented.
Vigor- Overall health of the tree.
w 0:!z
Q O M
c O
>W
NU
`o m
72
130 Q J
m
UC/)
Q
m
0
m
J
d
N
N
�y o
L�
r!
L
LU
Im
�O
Z
0
W
lco
Im
z
O
z
O
a) LA a) N
.0 N c .c t a) c am-+
a) 0 �- a) a)
CL
a v m +r m 0- (`6 Q -c m L m
+. c Cl) + �, O c In 4- C
Y m O 75 t 0 L O O Y m 0 0 L O ,c co c
m c E U N � c cn m c E - U a) to `c of
E m a) m cts-a N E m N m -0 c N
a O c .c N -O t o c- p �n c .c L O a) Q
Y c E C c fn 0 r, Y� �' �.� C (n N
�3:0 Ca) m�am)-0 -0:3 0– c0 mom
o: o 0) m} c rn.0 c c b �' o rn m c 60 c
V � 0) to fn +3 N tm Y U �` N C fn a) Y
E� a)L �� L- c >+ ` E� a'N� u) a) c >+
Co
q m U m `Q m m j N m 0 m t �'c CU c
o m c o-0 �n 0L �� a) O m c " �n � - a)4 0
cE c=E ��. �nc0rn aEmc=E -ate. �ncorn
Q� 3 U) CL (M 0) T 3 C aci 0.0)0 0)
a) a) E c m 0 m t 'cn m 0.i .m a) c () 0 m .c 'u, m aj
�2 off- ° E?W CLaU-,�z 0�.�-Z> o� ° E (D u) aou— z o E
O "1
Z � �d
U
LU
Y
z
O
Z
>
J
L
m
O
O
U
U
J
Q
U
z
UJ
H 2
m z
io
lq
Y
m
O
J
z,
co
m
O
U
L- _O
W L
0 m
W
W
L
LO om
V
U
OL
Lu
Q
C/)
CO
a
L
in U
>
>
a J
co
{—
Z
co
Z
Z
cu
ca
UU
O
a
O
fa
U
U
U
O
J
o
++
N
a)
L
C a-+
O�
CD
CCL
c to
Z
7
C
+r
.�
a)
L
O
•i-+
�Eo
N
�o
coC
(
�-
L (� U)
a'ca
L
Om
F—
Q
ca
E
m
C O
O
a)
a� a)
Y N C
v
>
c
O
-C
c
N
`��
a
acn
= a)
is c,a)
-p
w
�= Y
O
E
C
N—
O U
cn
-C a)
�
C
O
O
C a)
OL
a) C
C
.O
N a
m
C
O +.
U
U
O Q
CM
m E
c
O)
a)
._c
Y
Q..-
O
O
a)
= N N
N
'
`
j:E LM 0
C;)
a)
(a
M U
m
t
ca
U
0) .�
N ,N
++
M (a
O
Y Q
O
N
~
.0
Q
A 2
a) �
L
Q�
"O fA co�
a)
Zc
O ca
C
Q
co
c
a)
. C
C L
O
a
o
v
a
0 0)
c
v C
0 .D
ca
U 3
N
CL C)
cm
a) rnC N
CD
O Z.—
O
L
a) E
_
•C a)
� co
O ca L
fn
a)
a)
a) E
L .� 'C
�
(D
CO
rn O a)
O
I—�
OH
O L
E>
(� Q
U IL
Z O
E
N
��—
N O++
�LL
O
O p
,�
to
C
QZ�+r
CL
O o
Z LL C,4
M
Q
U
2
co O M O
W
< c
Z O O
z�_
O --� >
O O p
U U U
CD
.CU
0o
cY co
N
Q
w
0
J
U)
H
z
CW
L
0
a)
D
CB
L
O
C
Ca
O
cm
m a)
C CO
E co
Of .1
ME. -Ir -
0 •
m
m cis - is
0 O O N2
J
Q
U
Q
[H L O
� 'L
mmza M
—. 7— . _
LO
W 4t
LU
�_0
O Qc
O
C
c6
+' O O
c6
{= o
O a) 0
z
c
C=
a)
v 0
O
V O A
c
�i
O
O
E .4?
v) cu ()
O U
cv
O
CL
o
c
CU
CCU
a) a)
Y a) c
C6
U4-
y+
o
U
c
L
C: -C
O°c
a cu
O
4--
a)
H E
CU N
�cc
L-
E
m
c
a)
a)
_0 V
L U)
a)
c
U a)
r
W
O
U
ccn i
a)
En
a)
=U
a) a)
+' Q
oo
ryW
CU
o
O
(D a)
D
ui
-0
CD 0 O
a)
cn
''5OEc
a)
co
CD
>
cu m
CDC.)
_O
�3—s°o�,UE
'a
°
c
octet
a
P: .L
T
Q
EY
O N E
- a,L
t
ca
�-5
L
o
°
a-
'�
a) -0
O-0 >,
E
O
�
-v
O
L7
0-
0
ani
O �.�.D°'a,ccc�rn
� .>
a)
c
a)
(D
cncn��
cnwc`�cFn=cncnc`-0
U a)
a)E�ca�c�cno�°°��U
c5
mm°°
:o°°Elmm°fit
0 N
c
a) a)
c
E
°) c
cOn � c
H
H 0
.r LL 3 c
a
Z n
.
I—
I—
c LU },
� f
-
Z
N
m
m cis - is
0 O O N2
J
Q
U
Q
[H L O
� 'L
mmza M
—. 7— . _
LO
W 4t
LU
�_0
O Qc
O Qc
c6
+' O O
c6
{= o
-C
L L
a)
O
v 0
O
V O A
c
U M
c
L� CU
O
C6
O U
O
O
CL
c
CU
CCU
M
C
M a)�+
(D
y+
E`u
a) N
°°c
a) � m
E°
a)
O°c
a cu
E
cc
H E
in
`O or 2
cncaU)
0.0
^� L ()
CL
LL Q ch
I
cnc6CO)
5 U .)
L
Q in
00
N�N
r
TA
"O
��
3°
a)
c
3ca
a)
c
cu
>,
cn
L
E
CL
� >,L
° c
m
co
a)
E
a C
C:
E�
�cc
aECD
�cc
O°
a)
.Q
U w
° °
U
U a)
O
U
O
O
a) a)
Q
O
a)
C
a) a)
+' Q
0)
C:+'
ca
cn
a)
4-
N
cn
>
i)U
CDC.)
0)W
�0)
°
c
° c
_
R'
a)
L
o
E
a
O
L�
O
�E
�
-v
O
L7
0-
0
ani
a°i
� .>
a)
c
a)
(D
> ami
cnwc`�cFn=cncnc`-0
c5
EO
3
0 N
c
a) a)
c
E
°) c
cOn � c
E -F-
ca
cn
a) �
QW-
m
a) a)
°
> O
°
N m
Qw-a-
in
`O or 2
cncaU)
0.0
^� L ()
CL
LL Q ch
I
cnc6CO)
5 U .)
L
Q in
00
N�N
r
TA
ar
c
0
m
J
c
0
O
zz LLI
to V7
�r2 c•E U
d a)
eoZa atto
L
U Q C
W
z
LLI
O L
Q- =-
a)
U
C
>,.r-
O
E
Qc
U O C
(c OC
O O
U)
co
0)C
U
O ca
N
z
0
O
U
0. U
c
W
()
ca
Ell
= c
cm
a
(6
O c
CCU
E
�
(D.r
a) (D •co
1
�
P -6 E
zz LLI
to V7
�r2 c•E U
d a)
eoZa atto
W
z
LLI
4+ c
3 co
a)
t:
m
ocaNi
>,.r-
E
Qc
Q
(c OC
O O
0)C
W
O
U
O
-0
()
U)
cm
a
a) a)
t a)
CL
o
;
't
�
� .(J)
oc�
Ba)a)
Z
c
0
0 a)
CU
a)
> N
0
co
co
`
c W=
a)
a) E
E
O C
tell p c
2
Hf-
2 N
Ni�
o� T
aW-a
a
o��
Z T
Q
U
zz LLI
to V7
�r2 c•E U
d a)
eoZa atto
k➢
W
LLI
CC
k➢
41b,
41%
r
Irl
tis1.r '
r Yu�.� .-�Sltii.�.�'�Liaj • 1 � I. -a
ow- W -1,y ' i
l
A •.• ��.
�K.
f I rw
1 1 �
�� i
J,1 II 1 '+1 I r/
1 as l �i
e If,
I /'
GI Pg 1 id ° I r
ui I� Itt
1v
41
0 o t ll
U 1 1 • �i 1 I II
FL i
A i tj
I i i u I
a�R
t �
7
I
tt. /
o ><
b
42
O
b
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF THE BRONSON COMPANY
LOT 190, TRACT 7993, SURVEYING SERVICES SURVEY PREPARED FOR
CITY OF CUPERTINO, DASARI FAMILY TRUST "
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, 6206 EPPS DRIVE MARCH 6, 2017
STATE OF CALIFORNIA WINTON, CA 95388
(209)60&7390 K-4R9lehlorovnco cwn
2
y y
Tract 7993 Stauffer Lane Tree Appraisal List
MARCH 2017
TREE #
TREE NAME
Coast Live Oaks
TREE
APPRAISAL
TR#1
$12,300.00
TR#2
Coast Live Oak
$34,300.00
TR#3
Coast Live Oak
$ 1,030.00
TR#4
Coast Live Oak
$18,400.00
TR#5
Coast Live Oak
$ 1,300.00
TR#6
Peach species
0
TR#7
Peach species
0
TR#8
Peach species
0
0
$67,330.00
TR#9 Peach species
TOTAL
Trunk Formula Method Worksheet
Case # Z Propertr, - Date'' ; r
Appraiser
Field abseftations
I. Species
2. Condition _ - _%
3. 'hnk Circunferencef
in./Cm Diameter in
4. Location % =S
[ ite °/a +Contribution _a/❑ + Placement °lo]
Regional Plant Appraisal Committee and✓orAppraiser-Developed
or -Modified Information
5. Species rating %
6. Replacement Tree Size (diameter) in./cm
(Trunk Area) t_ in2/cm2 TAR
7. Replacement Tree Cost $
(see Regional Information to use Cost selected)
8. Installation Cost $
9. Installed Tree Cost (#7 + 48) $
10. Unit Iree Cost $ �.::. per �2�2
(see Regional Information to use Cost selected)
Calcination byAppraiser using Field and Regional Information
11. Appr�dsed Trnnk Area:
;(TAA or ATAA; use Tables 4.4-4.7)
ox c2 (#3) x 0.08 in2/Cm2
or d2 (#3) x 0.785
12. Appraised Tree Trunk Increase (TAINCR) = t
TAA or ATAA :' • in21Cm2 (#1l.) - TAR' ' %n?/cm2 (#6) lame
13. ]basic Tree Cost = TAINCR (#12) ' ' in2/cm2 x Unitrj�ee Cost (#10) $
Per in2/Cm2 + Installed Tree Cost (#9) $ = $ -
14. Appraised Value = Basic 'wee Cost (413) $ x Species rating
(#5) �� x Condition (#2)6-1'%x Location (#4):.�p/a - $__
15. If the Appraised Value is $5,000 or more, round it to the nearest $100; if it
is less, round to the nearest $10.
16. Appraised Value = (#14) $
Items 5 through 10 are detem-lined by the Regional Plant Appraisal Coimnittee. The
Wholesale Replacement wee Cost, the Retail. Replacement Tree Cast, or the
Installed Tree Cost (#9) divided by the Replacement Tree Size (#6) Cali be used for
the Unit Tree Cost (#10), or it can be set by the Regional Plant Appraisal Committee.
Trunk Formula Method Worksheet
f
Case # Property.._ Date f
{=�
Appraiser i r'
Field Cbser 06ns
1. Species
2. Condition
3. 3bmk Circumference in./cm Diameter "nim
4. Locatipp % = [Site, `°/o + Contribution s%+Placement
- 3 - /6
Regional Plant Appraisal Committee andJorAppraiser-Developed
or -Modified I-nformation
5. Species rating gra
xn
6. Replacement Tree Size (diameter) �
_ n
('Ii unk Area) -9 : ° in2/cm2 TAR
7. Replacement Mree Cost $ , r
(see Regional Information to use Cost selected)
8. Installation Cost $
9. Installed Tree Cost (#7 + #8) $
10. Urdt T'fee Cost $ : �_ der int/r�n2
(see Regional Information to use Cost selected) -
Calculatio-ns by Appraiser using Pield and Regional Info•r-mation
11. Appraised Trunk Area:
(TAA or ATAA; use Tables 4.4-4.7)
or c2 (#3) x 0.08 int/cmc
or d2 (#3) x 0.785
12. Appraised Mree Tank Increase (TAINt310 -
TAA or ATAA ' u12/cm2 (#11) - TAR in2/cm2 (#6) - in2/cm2
13. Basic Tree Cost = TAINCR (#12)! -- in2/cm2 x Unit'i,-ee Cost (#10) $
Per in2/cm2 + Installed 7i ee Cost (#9)
14..Appraised Value = Basic Thee Cost (#13) $ x Species rating
(#5)-O/ox Condition (#2) % x Location (#4)L.%- $
15. If the Appraised Value is $5,000 or more, round it to the ne rest $100; if it
is less, round to the nearest $10.
16. Appraised Value = (914) $ •`
Items 5 through 10 are determined by the Regional Plait Appraisal Coxlututiee. The
Wholesale Replacement Tree Cost, the Retail Replacement Tree Cost, or the
Installed Tree Cost (#9) divided by the Replacement Tree Size (#6) can be used for
the Unit Tree Cost (#10), or it can be set by the Regional Plant Appraisal Committee.
' ELRTIFTED
1'1RSt�[.t5°I'
L�j
Trunk Formula Method Warksheet
Case #f .
PrPPertY• _—- Date
Appraiser
Field Observations
1. Species
2. Ce Ait ian /a
3. 'I1-unk Ciretunference in./cm Diameter imidrn
4. Location % = [Site LO -°/n + Contribution 1�'/n + Placement � 4iaj
-3-'3%
Regional Plant Appraisal Committee and/or Appraiser -Developed
or Modified Information
5. Species rating
6. Replacement Mree Size (diameter) cin
(Trunk Area) c 9 in2/cm2 TAR
7. Replacement Mree Cost 1
(see Regional Information to use Cost selected)
8. Installation Cost
9. Installed Tree Cost (#7 + #8)
•7 rr
10. Unit wee Cost $ c; per inFcm2
(see Regional Infoiniation to use Cost selected)
Calculations by Appraiser using Field and Regional Information
ap3,ra' ed. W.
,(TA or ATAA; u6 Tables 4.4--4.7)x,-
or'(#3) x 6.08 . i2 2
2 = 11 �
or d (#3) x 0.785 -�
12. Appraised FreeIncrease (TAIL
TAA or ATA .`�in2/ 2 (#11) - TARr 2/ 2 (�#{,)'2 2
13. tic Tree Cost -�CR (#12) 9 2- ? ,' in2/cm2 x Unit Tree Cvgt (#10) $
per in2/cm2 + Installed Tree Cost (#9) $ 3 � A
14. Appraised Value= Basic Tree Cost (#13) $ 7 x Species rating
(#5) i °Ia x Condition (#2) ; - 6 x Location (#4) zjfl/a
15. If the Appraised Value is $5,000 or more, round it to the nearest $100; if it
is less, round to the nearest, $10.
a
16. Appraised 'V'alue = (#14)
items 5 through 10 are deteinlined by the Regional Plant Appraisal Coirmlittee. The
Wholesale Replacement Tree Cost, the Retail Replacement Tree Cost, or the
ha&talle€1 Tree Cost (#9) divided by the R.eplacement'l-ee Size (#6) can be used for
the Unit Tree Cost (#10), or it can be set by the Regional Plant Appraisal Conunittee.
fi ink Formula Woad Worksheet
Case # i Property 1 -)ate r
Appraiser --- _
Field Obse'ruations f
1. species.
2. Condition %
3. ink Circumference in./cm Diameter
4. Location % = [Site'!) %+ Con.tribudon,�)L%+Placements—�/o]
Regional Plant Appraisal Committee and /orAppraiser-Developed
or -Modified Information
5. Species rating r' oJo
r.
6. Replacement Mree Sime (diameter) inJ
(Prink Area) in2/cM2 TAR _
7. Replacement Thee Cost ]�
(see Regional Information to use Cost selected)
8. Installation Cost $
9. Installed wee Cost (#7 + #8)
10. rdt Tfiree Cost $
(see Regional Information to use Cost selected)
Calculations by Appraiser using Field and Regional Information
11. Appraised Think Area:.
(TAA or ATAA; use Tables 4.4-4.7)---,
or G2 (#3) X 0.08 - r in2lcrC�2
or d2 (#3) x 0.785
12. Appraised 'lee Tank Increase (TAINcR)`~
TAA or ATAA i� /enz2 (#11) —TAR _ in21ctn2 n21) 2
13. Basic Tree Cost w TAINCR (#12) . uj'/cM2 x Unit TreeCost (#10) $
per in%M2 + Installed �&ee Cost (#9) $ = $ _
14. Appraised Value = Basic Tree Cost (#13) $ x Species rating
(#5)'.- '_'/% x Condition (#2), % x Location (#Q.L% = $ -.
15. If the Appraised Value is $5,000 or more, round it to the nearest $100; if it
is less, round to the nearest $10.
16. Appraised 1l lie = (#14) $— ,
Items 5 through 10 are determined by the Regional plant Appraisal Comn-dUee. The
Wholesale Replacement Tree Cost, the Retail Replacement Tree Cost, or the
Installed Tree Cost (#9) divided by the Replacement Tx Size (#6) can be used for
the Unit Ti^ee Cost (#10), or it can be set by the Regional Plaint Appraisal Conunittee.
Trunk Formula Mothad Worksheet
Case # Property_
Date,,,%
Appraiser
Field UbseervaaAons
1. Species; _ f }
2. Condition � f t % �f
3. Timnk Circumference in./cm Diameter
4. Location % = [Site - % + Contribution + Placemen L,` ,"1%]
0/o
Regional Plant Appraisal Committee and/or Appraiser -Developed
or -Modified Information
5. Species rating
6. Replacement nee Size (diameter) in./cm
(Trunk Area) ' in2/Cm2 TAR
7. Replacement. Tree Cost
(see Regional Information to use Cost selected)
8. InstAlllation Cost $;
9. Imstalled Tree Cost (#7 + #8) $ v: �
10. Unit Mee Cost $ r`• r ' � � per in2/cm2
(see Regional Information to use Cost selected)
Calculations by Appraiser using Field and Regional Information
11. Appraised Trunk Area:,
(TAA or ATAA, use Tables 4.4-4.7)
or c2 (#3) x 0.08 -_ ' �n%rn2
or d2 (#3) x 0.785
12, Appraised Tree Thmk Increase (TAINCR)
TAA or ATAA _. ii!6/. (#Il) - TAR- �. n2/c,n2 (#6) = in2/cm2
13. Basic Tree Cost = TARJCR (#12) in2/crn2 x Unit Tree Cost (#10) $
per in2/cm2 + rnstaged T1)ree Cost (#9) $ _ $
14. Appraised Value = Basic 9Dree Cost (#13) $ x Specie -s rating
(#5) •�L% x Condition (#2) �°� x Location (#4) �°/o = $ r r
15. If the Appraised Value is $5,000 or more, round it to the nearest $100; if it
is less, round to the nearest $10.
16. Appraised Value = (#14) $—!
Items 5 through 10 are deternuned by the Regional Plant Appraisal Committee. The
Wholesale Replacement Tree Cost, the Retail Replacement Tree Cost, or the
Installed ' -ee Cost. (#9) divided by the Replacement Mee Size (#6) can be used for
the Unit wee Cost (#10), or it can be set by the Regional Plant Appraisal Committee.