The URL can be used to link to this page

PC Staff Report 02-19-2014 CC)MMUI\IITY I3EVEL+DPP►�LEN'F'I��i'A:RTNIEI�TT' �; , CIT3°�I,A.I.l 1.(3�t��}TC3�R�AV�T`iLiE�Ct�P�3't'I`fiNO,CA��0�=�-3�55 ��1��777-33�1�•��X j�fi)777-3333 ��' PLAI'+�l'�Il"�G� �[)M1VII5 SI(�I'� �TA�F TiEI�t�I�T Agenda iterc� No. Agenda 17ate:Fel�ru�ry�19,�t��I� Appiication l+do.; GPA�2D].�-D'� Applican� Cit� �f�uper�ino Locatior�lAT'N: City�vid� SLJBJECT: Study Session t� r��>i��v Housin� Eleznent requirements �r�d sit�� tn acl�i�v�� the iZe�ianal. Ht�using�'��ls�lllocation�RHNA) fc�r tl�e upramin�201=�-ZC122 Hausing Eiemez�f _ I�ECC��iC11rIENDATION: Staff rec�mmencis that the Pl�nnit�g Com�n�.ssion; 1. R�viz��r�h�report on}�ot�ntial Housing Eleinent sites�r►d �. Discuss pc��ent�� iausing sites and �rovid� comm�nt� �rn t�� ic�rity hou�ing si�es tta b� studie� iri tl�e joi��t Gen�r�l Plan Am�ndment�nd H�using El�ment Environrn�ntal In�pact �eport {EIP). BACKGROUND. H+�usitig Eientenf t]verview Ti1 ae�+�rdane��ith State Iav��, Calift�rnia �itaes m�ast have �i� ada�t�d General I'lan, ��Thi�ti niust �cantair� a ��usi�3g �leme��t. �oiising E1�me31t .laSV requires ��at �11 jurisdi�tians facilit�ate hr�usiri� deu�Ioprnent�by cre�ting��Iicie� ��xc� adc��ting l��c� irse plar�s anc� re�ulat�r}?'sch�m�s tli�t �rc�vi�� c�ppc�r.tunities for l-�ou5�:ng develo�ment, ii�cIudin� i�i�its th�t cc�uTd aceomn�odate ho�s�hc�lds ivith v�r�r lo��>, lc��v, mod�r�te an� 1�i�11�r incc�xnes. �or infc�rma�ion c�n Housin� Eternent cont�r�t, please_s�e�ttacl�.ment PC=1. Stat� la�v require� that each cify aiad county u�date its Housing Elerment on a pr�-deterniined �}�cl�;fr�r�us cyc1�, �ousin�Element updates must be adcspted b}�Jai�uar��31, ?t115 (�lus a 1��- c�ay grac� p�ric�d�. If tiyis adnpti�n.d��dlil3e:is m�t, �.he ��1�.nning p�rioc� Ec�r t��is r}�cl��xt�r�ds frc�zn a�o�tian ta Ja.nu�r�f 3�, 2023 ��a� eiglzt ��e�rs). �tl��rinris�, the City mus� u��te t11� H�usiz�; Clern�nt a�;ain in 2(319(ever�£our ye�rs}. 8�8 Regio�tal HousitxgIVeedsAllocation (IZ�iIUA) The RHNA is a1z estimate of projected needed housir�g units t�roughout tlze State and is based on Department af Financ�population projections and regional popula�ion forecasts. The RI-TNA iden�ifies Cuperfino's regional hausing needs by inCOme levels: � • . • 'V'er �.,ow 356 �� Lour 207 Moderate 231 �� Above Moderate 270 ; Tota1 1,0�� The City is not obligated to construct the housing units identified by the RHNA. Rather, the City's responsibility is to demonstrate adequate capacity, by identifying specific sites, to satisfy tlle RHNA under existing zonuzg and land use policy. HCD generally requires jurisdictions to show a surplus of sites/units in order to guarantee that the City could realistically accommodate the RHl�A allocations. General Plan Amendment In addition to the Housing Element, the City is also pracessing a �eneral Plan Amendrnent {GPA). The GPA was authorized by the City Council in August�012 and be�u1 in March 2013. The GPA includes an analy�is of the falloxnring key topics: A. De�elo��azerrt Alincrztior�s - T"he primary purpase of the GPA is to replenish, re-allocafie, and increase citywide a�fice, commercial, hotel, and residentia� a11oc��ions in c�rder to plan for antieipated future dev�lopment activity while keeping with the community's character, goals,a�nd objectives. B. CQiisoli�r�te Review Of Is�dividur�l GPA Reguests - The secondary pur�ose of the GPA is to consolidate development requests by several property o��vners for amendments to the General I'lan. The cornrnunity vision developed as part of the GPA process tvill help evaluate the development requests along with the associated Gen�ral Plan amendments being request�d. The consolidated General I'lan amendment process also provides a unique apportunit�r for the community to provide input on the various requests received a� a cit�Twide level, instead of a site-by-site basis,which only looks at a limited scope. Th�ee draft Ge�eral Plan C+or�cept Al�ernatives have be�n prepared that outline different future scen�rios. The alternatii�es were develc�ped ta re£lect cornmu.nity input (workshaps az�d nnline input) as �c�irell as to respand to regional economic growtl� factors and housing needs. The alternatirres ratzge frorn minimal chax�ge to tl�e current 2005 General I'lan (Alternatic�e A) to rr►ore rnoderate gro�n�th(Alterr�a�ive B} to a g�eater change ir�developn�ent cri:teria�rhich reflect the various properEy owners' requests(Alternative C). 89�P9 These changes in development intensity include changes to land uses,heights and developmenf allocation.The alternatives specifically focus these changes on five major mixed-use corridors in the cc�re of Cupertino—Homestead, North Wolfe, Heart of Ehe City, I�orth 17e Anza, and South De Anza. DISCUSSI�N: Housing,Eiement Sites Criteria HCD Criteria HCD revie�vs e�ch Housing Eiernent's sites inventory to determine if adequate sites Izac'e bee�1 identi#ied to rneet the RHNA. Preparatian of a "site suitability �nalysis" is an important step in addressing tl�te adequate sites requirement.For additional details �an HCD's site suitability requirernents and criteria, pleas� see Attachment PC-1. A key point to note in I-iCD's criteria are tha� sites �vith a net densify loc��er than 20 d�velling units �er acre da not +qualify for meeting affc�rrlable housing requir�ments. Therefore, most sites discussed later in this report are in ar�as that are at or above this den�ity. Other S@COti(�lX)'i� CT'1�L3"IQ (St,�str�ina�le Comraz�sniti�s StrategylOrie Bay Area PI�z�� zr�d C��per•ti�z� G�nerrzl Pir��) In additioz�tn the Sta#e-wrde crit�ria th�t HCD uses to determine sit� suitability, the Sustainable Cotnmunities StrategyjOne Bay Area P1an cont�ibute additional criteria regaxdinb ��hat makes a desirable housing site in the ABAG reginn. The r�gion's Sustainabie Communities Strategy and the Ch1e Bay Area Plan focuses development in Priority Develapn�ent Areas (PL7A). Th� City's General Plan policies are �eneraliy consistent w�ith the strategies in the One Bay Area Plan. For additio�al details on the ather secondary criteria aild PDA's please see Attachrnent PC-1. Cup�rtin�'s PDA llas been identifi�d v��ith a yello;v outli�le on Attachrnent PC-2. Potential Hbusin�Element Sites Consic�eration of Housing Element sites is still in the prelirninary stages. Througl� tl�is study session, tlze City�vill continue to discuss sites with the public.Additio�lal sites may be identified 'l,l� pllbliC iI1pl.lt driC� COII11T21SS10ri21' t'�1SCt1SSlt�11. Whi1e s�veral sites are discussed in the report, the City is only obligated ta pick sites enough to cuinulatively add up to 1,Q64 units. The cumuIative tot�I of the rea�istic yield of all the sites �roposed to date far exceeds thc City's RHNA. A rnap has been pre�ared �see AtEachment PC-2) that identifies�11�I1e sites �ropos�d to date. An accompanying table {Attachment PC-3) pro��ides additionai info�•mation �bout each site.Sites are not in any particular tird�r of prioriiy. Sites in three categeries have been identified an the map: ■ Existiszg Housing Elet�zent sites —Seven sites ide��tified ir1 t11e 2007-2�14 Housiilg Element are currently avail�ble. The others have ei�her been r�developed dr do nof ineet the criteri�. o Lot Co��solidatiof�Poter�tiaX—Sites adjacent to existing Hc�usin��len�ent sit�s that�ould be coi-�sidered for addition into the Housing Element for mor�collesive develaprnent. 89�30 ■ Sites Pro�osed By Prn�ert� Owrzers - Ten property owners have ix�dicated an interest in being included in the Sites Tnventory. Most of t�e developers have indicated a density range highe�than that rurrently ailowed by the General T'lan and zoning for their site. • Sites I'roposed By Worlcshop Pt�rticipants —Workshop participants at the January 23, 2�14 workshop identified 21 sites which could potentially be included in the Sites Inventory. Environmental Tteview An Environmental Irnpact Report{EIRj is being prepared for this project.The preparation of#he EIR will commence once the City Council provides its cornments on the sites to be analyzed as part of each alterna�ive st�zdied in the EIR at its March 4, 2014 meeting. The 30-day Notice of Preparation (NOP) period will commence soon after the City Council meeting, with a scoping session scheduled for March 11,2014. It is anticipated that preparaYion of the Draft EIR wiil take abou� four months and will be released for public review in Summer 2014.A �ammunity open house is planned during the 45- day public review period. FolTowing the cic�se of the public review period, a Final EIR will be prepared. The recc�mmendation from the Environmental Reviet�v Committee, public hearing for the Planning Commissic�n and public hearing far the Council ETR review and certi£ication are tentatively scheduled for Fa112014. DISCUSSION: Summary of Februar,y 12 Hausing Commission Workshop _ C7n February 12, the Housing Commission hosted a warkshop to continue the Housing Element Sites discussion and prioritize sites fnr inclusian in the Housing Element. Following a project update presentation, approximately fifteen {15j participants broke into three grnups and discussed identificatian of nesv sites and prioritizing potential housing sites to meet tlze RHNA of 1,Ob4. The groups generally seerned to agree that sites with multiple access points, minimal impacts to schaols and generate minimal level of n�eighborhood concer�ls would be appropriate as Housing Element sites. Some of these included sites previously id�ntified in this report. 5orne participants also added new sites to the list. 5ome of the si�es wer�prioritized by one group but not by others and sc�me of sites jvere only acceptable if new development�vas a mixed use one. 7'he balance of tl�e sites have been leff c�n the list since there �vas no consensus on w�hether to keep or remove the sites.These have all been included in Att�dtments PC�2 and PC-3. Cos�rn�er�ts fr�tn the PuI�li� The following is a summary of tlze key poznts made at tl�e�ebruary 12 meeting: ■ Building l�eigllts shoulcl reflect the character of the City. . � Irnpacts of ne�w hausing on schools and traffic ne�d to be carefixily co�lsidered in the siting of housing. ■ A balance �f retailJrestaurants and housing needs #� be achieved. Do not eliminate places;vhere residents shop and dine out. 89�1 ■ I�Tevv housing should be distributed throughout Cupertina. ■ Provide opportunities for different forrns of housing that may not be in Cupertino today, part�cularly fdr senior residents and re�ent college braduates who do not need as much living space. • Given tl�at the city is virtually buiIt out, ensure that in futur� RHNA processes that Cuperfii�a is not overburdened by a commitment to accammodate ec�en more hausing. • Tl�e H�mpton site is a gnod location to accornmc�date a lar;e portion of �l�e rurrent RHNA. ■ The current stock of affordabl�housing needs to be preser�c�ed to the extent possible. The Hausing Commission recommended forwarding the sites highlighted by the workshop participants. .1�ttachments PC-2 and PC-3 highlight the sites that the Hausing Commission recommended forc�varding to the Planning Commission for consideration. EIR Alternatives and Densitv Considerations for Sites Tl�e California Enviranrnental Quality Act {CEQA) requires that alternati��es to a praject be studied. T11ese must a�.roid or substantia�ly iessen at least one of tt�e si�nificant impacts af t1�e Proposed Prpject. In addition,CEQA dQes not permit projects to be analyzed incrementally. A combined Environmental YmpacE Report �vill be prepared for the General Plai� Arnendment as weil as the 2014-2022 Housing Element. The EIR will analyze the follflwing key issues: ■ The General Plan Amendmenfs — As mentioned earlier in this sfaff report, the Cify is curren�ly pr�cessing a General Plan Amendment. Three draff General Plan Cancept Altematives ranging fram minimal change to the current 2005 Gener�l Plan (Alternative A) ta �nore rnoderate growth {Altemative B) to � greater change in d�velopme��t cxiteria which refl�ct t11e various property ownexs' requests (Alternati�re C), have been prepa.red for ��alysis in the EIR. Alternatives A ar�d B avoid or substantially lessen at least one of the si�;nificant impa�ts of the Proposed Project{Alternative C}. At this time, no sites are proposed to be �liniinated from the study excepf as rliscuss�d below for each alternative. The preferred sites tn�ill Ue noted��hen a revie��v and decision c�n the fu�al list of sites is made by the City Council. The final clecision on the list of sites is expected in F�11 when the information on the E�� is available. Tt should be noted a lower density o� a site ��vill increase the number �f sites �hat neeci to be pick�d to cumulatively r�ach the 1,Ob4 units 12HNA oblig�tic�n, o Alternative A ��rill in�lude potent�al hc�uszn� sites only within existing density ranges in the G�neral Plan. Therefore, Alternati�Te A �vill not include sit�s ti�at �r�pc��e � minimum density exceedin�that allovved in the'�0{l5 General Plan. The t�nly change to this concept is in the South Sunnyvale-Saratoga �rea �I�e Anza Boulevard area south of�ighway 85), vvhich is proposed to be combined��vith the South De A:nza Boulevard Conceptual Plan {W�st si�e of De Aa�za Boulevard bet�veen Stevens 89�$2 Creek Boulevard ar�d Ballinger Road). The densify in the South SunnyvaIe-5aratoga area will change from 15 dwelling units per acre to 25 d��velling units per acre to be consistent with the density in the Sauth 17e Anza Boulevard ConcepMzal Plan Area. One site proposed by tlle property owner (Yamagami's Nursery) is located in this area a�d will be studied in this Altemative. o Alternative B represents moderate grawth along five mixQd use transit corridors. Therefore, in this Alternative, sifes proposed by property ovvners along major transit corridors, and selected by the City Council for inclusion, wiil be studied at a density between that in Alternative A and Altemative C {highest densi�y alternative). In this alternative, these sites �vvuld be studied at a density of 35 dwelling units per acre insteaci of 25 dwelling units per acre. Tn general, the current General Plan allows 25 dwelling unit$per acre exc�pt in the South Vallco Area where it is 35 d��velling units per acre. One property own�r (the Harnptons at Wolfe Rc�ad and Hwy 280� has proposed a density ranging from 6� �0 11t� dwelling units per acre on their site. 'I'herefore, their site is the only one selected at the loiver end of the density at 65 dwelling uni�s per acre. The reason this site has been included a� a higher density than 35 divelling units per acre, is �hat it is Iocated near the freeway and will cause minimal neighborh�od and school impacts (this site is served by the Santa Clara Unified Schnol District). o Under Alternative C {the proposed project), Housing Element sites proposed by Property Owners, and selected by the City Council to satisfy the RH11�`A requirement, will be s�idied at the maximum densi�requested by the property owner. o Finally, CEQA requires the anaiysis of the No Project Alterr►ative. The No Project Alterna�ive assumes no change to the current General Plan. The analysis for this alternative zvill include buildout of the current 2005 General Plan. Therefore, anly th� exi�ting housing eiement sites Tvill be included in tlle analysis. Under this scenario,there are no changes to exis�ing land use policies, height limits, land use �iesibnations, or any additional development allocation far offi�e, commercial, hotel and residential units. I�Io new sites will be studied. Othe�HocYSing Element R�quirements il�date Housirzg Policies Tli�update of the Housing Elem�nt has been divided into two areas of re��iew. The first ar�a of rei�iew is the subject of this meetinb-identification of ad�quate sites appropriately zoned in the City to accommodate the City's TtHNA. The secand area n£ revie�v is an analysis and update of the exis�ing policies and programs zvhic]Z iviil be pr�se�lted at a l�ter date {tentatively April 1, 2014 at a joint Planning Commission/Ci�r Cauncil meeHnb.) Streamlirred HCD IZevi�w 89�$3 H�D allaws for streamlined review of the Housing Element if the jurisdiction mee#s certain criteria. This prc�vides f�r priority review for jurisdictions that are eli�ible over jurisdictions that are eligible for st�ndard re�iew and limits the areas in which the HCD staff can �omm�nt on. Thes� criteria include the adoption of an HCD-�ertifi�d Housing Element, the adop�tion of a Density Bonus ordinance that conforms with State Law, tlle completion of re- zaning of alI Housing Elen�ent sites that needed �e-zoning c�ith the 2007-2014 Housing Element update, the adoption of adequate zoning to permit emergency shelters and transitional/supportive housin,g, and tl�e establishn-�ent of a reasonable accommodation procedure. If a jurisdi�tion is ilot eligible for the streamlined re�iew, HCD's revi�w generally takes longer—up fo the 60 day period they are permitfed by law to review the dc�cuments, thereby potentially delaying the adoption of the Hc�using Element. The adoption deadline remains January 31, 2015 {plus a 120-day grace�erio�l.) The City curre�tly co�npiies cvith alrnost all of the requirements to �uali#y fflr the streamlined revie�v--the City has a HCD certified Housin�;Element that has been adopted, all the re-zonir►g that was required zvith the last Housing Element cycle was completed at the same time as acioptio�l of the Housing Element, cornpleted u�dates to the municipal code to allow adequate en�er;ency sl�elter and transitionalJsupportive housing and the establishment of a reasanable accornmoda�ion procedure. The final requirement-the adap�ion of a Density Bonus ordinance that conf4rms to State L,acv-needs to be cc�mpleted prior to forwarding the draft of the Housing Element for HCD revie�v. The �it�� would have to comply cvith State Law with or ��rithout an updated ordinaa�ce.Ho�ever,having an updated ordinance will all�w the City to be eiigible for streamlined review. Staff an�icipates prepari�g this ordinance far Pla.nning Commission revieiv and Cauncil adoption at the time of presenting t}�e Draft Housing EIe�nent for fnr�.lrarding to the HCD for its review in Fa112014. PUBLIC NC�TICIP�TG &OUTREACH T�z addition ft� the workshnp at the Hnusing Commission meeting on F�bruary 12, 2014, tlle following outmach effarts have been unciertak�n on this proj�ct to date. Sttckeholder Irzter•views Stakeholder interviews were conducted on Dec�mber 11 & 12, 2013 to solicit input from stakeholders ranging firom community members, property o��ners, housing deveic�pers, service providers, School Districts and the business cotnmunity. The followi�lg is a summary of cc�mments frorn#he intervie�vs: � Overall hflusing affordabili#y and the �ap bet�c�een housing demand and supply at all income levels ■ Need diversity of affordable rental units at a11 i��come levels�nd all he�usell�Id types = Need to accommodate a gro�Tii�g aging population ■ Smaller units including innovative h�using models � Support for mixed-�se simil�r to 5antana Rowr or dotivnto��vn Mount�in Vie�tiT • Should b�Idw impacts ta schaols,priva�y,parking,nc�ise and�raffic • 5ignificant financiai constraints to affordable housing develo�ers due to dissolution 83�84 of Redevelflpment ■ School L3istricts north of the city are impacted due to higher student generat�on rates ■ Looking to increase capacity by adding new buildings and tempc�rary, modular units ■ Most t�f the Apple Campus 2 scl�ool impact fee allocated to Santa Clara Unified Uistrict��vhile th�expectation is that rnvst employees who move will reside within the CUSD service area. Sxrmrr�ary�f Jr�nuary 23 Joint T'C1�'IC Warksl�op On January 23, the Plan��ing �ommission and Housing Commissian hosted a joint workshop to begin the Housing Element Sites discussion. Eleven par�icipants broke into small groups and identified potential future sites for housing and criteria for increased density in certain areas including community benefits. Participants drew on maps and placed stickers to identify potential housing sites. The following is a summary of comments from the meeting: ■ Demand for market-rate small�sized unit� {limited bedroomsj to cater to peo�le �vorking at Apple ■ Add levels to school buildings to increase cap�city ■ Concerns about: o Churches naw having to be considered Housing Element sites o Sustainability 9f the One Bay Area Plan o Size of�he City's RHNA obligation o Loss c�f�ommunity amenities to housing The following table summarizes the noticing for this meeting. �y,��'�� :�a �� au�g�`�,��-� �a � '��y r�'�%'�.z�a�a..�a �� L�,. ��.-]%K �.'� 3�.� - ��: � ��z 3 �-t��s�t. '� s � -��:. . <.__.,i�U�,s,.� .,,.,...;. "� � ��:.,'?& ,�.,z..��:.,.,. ,.? �°�m..: ,x .... . ,�, .. ±.....,,:. . ., ,.,.. .,.,,_..« �, ,... .. .._...: . �:a a -�,..�,.�:r x_.z.a..,.� .,..>., � Ernail sent to all interested parties � Posted on the City's offi�ial notice bulletin signed up thrdugh the proje�t website board (�n�u�ecy��rior td the lier��•ing) • Letters sent ta current Housing � Pasted on the City of Cupextino's Web site Element sate property +owners and (on�zveek�rior to tlze 1�enri�l�) interested property c�wners � Posted on the project Website �one �tiTeek rior to ilearin j NEXT�TEPS Th�goal for this study session is to revieiv the Housing Commissions' input and sites presented to date, identify any other new potential sites for consideration, to plaee the sites in order of prefere�lce. The City Council�vvill meet on M�rch�,2014 to�rovide staff with Hnal directi�n an tl�e Housing Element sites �nd densities to be shxdied in the EIR. The palicy portion of the revierv of �he Housing Element will U� present to the Housing Commission i� lUlarch 2014 and the Planning Carnmission and City Council at the Joint rneeting an Apri11, 2014. 9(�5 Upon completion of the Final EIR, th�Draft Housing Element will be revieN�ed by the Planning Commission and adopted by the Council in Fall 2D14 for forc��arding to HCD. The Draft Housing Element z�viil iriclude: housing policies as ��vell as fhe final list of housing sifes as well as the relat�d General Plan Amendme�ts and rezoning for the sites. T:n addition, in order fo comply zvith streamlined HCD r�vie;�v, a Density Bonus OrdinanC�, «Till be pr�pared for review and adoptian. Upon HCD review and potential certification, the final Haizsing Element will be �resented fox Piannzng Commission review and City Council d�cision in earl}�2015. Prepared by: Piu Gl�osh,AICP, Senior Planner MIG, Consultant to the City of Cupertino Reviewed by: Approved by: !sl Gar�Ch�o JsJ Aarti Shrivastava Gary Chao Aarti Shrivastava Asst. Dir.of Comn�unity Development Director of Communii�.�Development Attachments PC-1. Housing Commission Staff Report PC-2. Pc+tential 2�1�-2022 Housing Element Sites M�p,rvith HC Priarities Indicated PC-3. Potential 201�-2022 Housing Element Sites Sumrnary Table, with HC Priorities Indicat�d 90�6 Attachment 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT . CIT'Y HALL , • 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO,CA 95014-3255 (408)777-3308 •FAX(408)777-3333 CUPERTINO HOUSING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. 1 Agenda Date: February 12, 2014 SUBJECT: 2015-2023 Housing Element Update—Sites Identification RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Housing Commission accept the report on potential Housing Element sites, host a community workshop to discuss housing site identification criteria and sites, and reconvene to provide direction to staff on priority housing sites. BACKGROUND: Housin�Element Overview The Housing Element is one of seven mandatory elements of the General Plan. The Housing Element specifies ways in which housing needs of existing and future resident populations can be met, and provides a comprehensive strategy for maintaining and expanding the City's housing supply available to all economic segments in the community, including very low, low, moderate and higher incomes. Housing Element law requires that all jurisdictions facilitate housing development by creating policies and adopting land use plans and regulatory schemes that provide opportunities for housing development. State law requires that each city and county update its Housing Element on a pre- determined cycle; for this cycle, Housing Element updates must be adopted by January 31, 2015 (plus a 120-day grace period). If this adoption deadline is met, the planning period for this cycle extends from adoption to January 31, 2023 (or eight years). Otherwise, the City must update the Housing Element again in 2019 (every four years). As required by the California legislature and codified in the Government Code, Housing Elements must include specific analysis and must meet statutory requirements regarding contents. State law mandates that all Housing Elements must: 1) identify and analyze existing and projected housing needs, 2) discuss constraints to housing development, and 3) �identify resources to meet housing needs (including identification of adequate sites to accommodate housing needs of all economic segments of the community). The Housing 487 Page 2 Housing Commission Housing Element Study Session February 12,2014 Element must include a statement of goals, policies, quantified objectives, and scheduled programs for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) is responsible for reviewing Housing Elements to determine compliance with Housing Element law. HCD also is the responsible body for establishing the statewide the quantified objectives for regional housing needs—the Regional Housing Needs Allocation ("RHNA"). � Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) The RHNA is an estimate of projected needed housing units throughout the State and is based on Department of Finance population projections and regional population forecasts. The RHNA estimates are also correlated with long-term regional transportation plans. HCD allocates the RHNA to each region. In the Bay Area, the Association of Bay Area Govemments (ABAG), the regional planning agency, is tasked with the responsibility of developing a regional housing plan—with a RHNA for each jurisdiction—to meet existing and future housing needs. The RHNA identifies Cupertino's regional housing needs by income levels. The income levels are separated into four categories: very low, low, moderate, and above moderate. The City's housing needs allocation for the period of 2015-2023 is 1,064 new housing units. The City is not obligated to construct the housing units identified by the RHNA. Rather, the City's responsibility is to demonstrate adequate capacity, by identifying specific sites, to satisfy the RHNA under existing zoning and land use policy. � � � • Ve Low 356 Low 207 Moderate 231 Above Moderate 270 Total 1,064 HCD generally requires jurisdictions to show a surplus of sites/units in order to guarantee that the City could realistically accommodate the RHNA allocations. DISCUSSION: Housin�Element Sites Criteria HCD Criteria HCD reviews each Housing Element's sites inventory to determine if adequate sites have been identified to meet the RHNA. Preparation of a "site suitability analysis" is an important step in addressing the adequate sites requirement. This analysis must 488 Page 3 Housing Commission Housing Element Study Session February 12,2014 demonstrate that identified sites can accommodate the housing needs—by income level— within the planning period of the element (2015-2023). While the site suitability review has a degree of subjectivity, HCD review primarily focuses on the following criteria in determining the likelihood that a developed site will be converted to some form of housing over the plaruzuzg period: existing use on the site, realistic potential for recycling, site size and ownership patterns, and development density. 1. Existing Use on the Site. HCD generally does not consider the following types of sites good candidates for private residential development: ■ Sites with existing multi-family housing developments consisting of 10 or more units, due to the potential loss of existing investment and revenue stream to the owner, unless the owner indicates his/her interest in redeveloping the site with additional residential uses. ■ Sites with condominium developments, since they typically have complicated ownership patterns and a developer would have to reach sales agreements with multiple owners. _ ■ Well-established organizations and institutions because of the difficulty such organizations and institutions would face relocating to locations, unless the . owner indicates his/her interest in redeveloping the site with residential uses. HCD requires a more detailed analysis of redevelopment potential on sites with the above types of uses. However, where adjacent vacant space is available and existing uses would not be removed, HCD does not generally consider the existing use on the site a cause for concern. 2. Realistic Potential for Recycling. HCD evaluates the feasibility of redevelopment based on a variety of factors, some of which include property owner interest in redevelopment with housing, market factors related to location or site characteristics, existing uses on the site that are highly valued and anticipated to remain, the condition and age of existing development on the site, and environmental liability risks, such as land contamination. 3. Site Size and Ownership Patterns. HCD believes that larger sites provide the opportunity to increase capacity potential and to provide flexibility with regard to design, public amenities, mix of housing types, and mixed use development. It also believes that lot consolidation potential of parcels can be a factor in determining site suitability. Lot consolidation potential can be based on ownership patterns (single, limited, or multiple owners), history of lot consolidation in the area, and specific knowledge of owner interest in lot consolidation. Where lot consolidation potential is likely, the time and cost associated with development is reduced and thus the likelihood of redevelopment is increased. 489 Page 4 Housing Commission Housing Element Study Session February 12,2014 4. Development Densit�. HCD has identified a density of 20 units per acre as adequate to encourage the development of affordable housing in Santa Clara County due to economies of scale that a developer can achieve. Sites that permit a density of less than 20 units per acre would not be considered as appropriate for fulfilling the lower-income RHNA requirement but could be appropriate for fulfilling the moderate and above moderate income RHNA requirement. In addition, HCD also evaluates the realistic yield for each site proposed to be on the Housing Sites Inventory. In Cupertino, HCD has accepted a realistic yield of 85% of the maximum density allowed on the site, based on city-specific historic project approval data. This means that for a one acre site, the maximum yield at a density of 25 dwelling units per acre is 25 units. However, the realistic yield for Housing Element purposes is (25�85%) =21 units. Other Secondary Cr�iteria (Sustainable Communities Strategy/One Bay Area Plan and Cupertino General Plan) In addition to the State-wide criteria that HCD uses to determine site suitability, the Sustainable Communities Strategy/One Bay Area Plan contribute additional criteria regarding what makes a desirable housing site in the ABAG region. The One Bay Area Plan is a long-range integrated transportation and land-use/housing strategy through 2040 for the San Francisco Bay Area. The Plan was jointly approved by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) in 2013. ABAG determined the City's and other local jurisdiction's RHNA based on the Plan. Pursuant to SB375, the Plan includes the regiori s Sustainable Communities Strategy and the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. The Plan focuses development in Priority Development Areas (PDA). PDA's are locally designated areas within existing communities that have been identified and approved by local cities or counties for future growth. 'These areas are typically accessible to public transit, jobs, recreation, shopping and other services and absorb much of the growth anticipated in the region. In Cupertino, the Priority Development Areas are located along Stevens Creek Boulevard between Highway 85 and the City of Santa Clara and along De Anza Boulevard between Stevens Creek Boulevard and Highway 280 (see Attachment HC-1 —VTA PDA Map) The City's General Plan policies are generally consistent with the strategies in the One Bay Area PIan. Key themes include: 1. Location along major transportation routes with access to transit or within 1/2 mile of a VTA Priority Development Area (PDA) 2. Proximity to employment and activit�� centers 3. Proximity to amenities 4. Corner lot(s) preferred—such parcels provide the most flexibility to accommodate mixed-use developments and avoid impeding parking and connectivity between mid-block parcels. 490 Page 5 Housing Commission Housing Element Study Session February 12,2014 Potential Housing Element Sites Consideration of Housing Element sites is sti11 in the preliminary stages. No decisions regarding rezoning, density increases, or inclusion in the Housing Element has yet been made. Through this study session, the City will continue to discuss sites with the public. Additional sites may be identified via public input and Commissioner discussion. While several sites are discussed in the report, the City is only obligated to pick sites enough to cumulatively add up to 1,064 units. T'he cumulative total of the realistic yield of all the sites listed below, at the maximum densities proposed, is 5,426. A map has been prepared (see Attachment HC-2) which identifies all the sites discussed below. Existing Housing Element sites: The 2007-2014 Housing Element identified 13 sites (See Table 1 below.) Of these, four sites have since been developed and three sites do not meet the criteria discussed previously and have been identified in the table below with strikethroughs. For specifics on these sites, please see Attachment HC-3 (Site Criteria). Tab1e 1: Existing Housin�Element Sites Max. Size Current Land Use Current No Sites Address Density (acres) �DU/gr. ac.) Designation Zoning 1. �aQ�� c+„�,�r� r,,,,,,,,,,,,,�;.,i i n��;,,,,i n�� . �,.,,,,7.ui�,a �� 5 r�„�;,a,.,-,,-;.,i �3 ��{�� "�QQC.C. C'!-.�Tr��-�n �'�mmn�+l.in��n�Fin�/ 171�'� z�c� r',-,,.,1.Rlt„-7 �z� z�J Ta.,�;.-a.,,-,�-;.,7 77^�\ �� 2. I-Restaurant 20007 Stevens 1.35 25 Commercial/Office/ P(CG, Creek Blvd Residential Res) 3. ��--�-�--�i�e �nn��z c.,;,,�-, �,,,Y,,,.,,,,.,,,.,iincc;,,,,i � � � a:� � ' ,�„�;a,,,-,�;�, � 4a. r,..,,-„a u„��,.�i �nn�zn c,.,,�,,,,-.� r,,-.,-,,,,,,,,,,-.;.,i i n��;,-.,,i ni� �s r-,,,,,,,i. R��„a � � rl,.�;a„r,.;.,� }�� 1H.,�: �99�1�- �,,,,-,,.,.,,,,,�,,,7 i n��;,,,,i �-(-�G_ . � � � n„ ;a,,,..�•.,, }� r .,,,i.,.t,n,,,,,-, -�-88--3�� r,,,,,-„Y,,,,,,,,.,i i n��;,,,,i ni�rr... --� - --r° �� J � !� 1?.,�;,a,,,�+;.,1 17^�1 �� . .�� 4b. r�,,,.,-,,,,. ,-.�c�iz �mm� c+„t,,,,.,� r�,,,.,.,,-,..,,,.,,;.,i i n��;,,,,i �. � r,,,,,,,i.Rit,a a-4� �5 n„�;,a,,,-,,-;.,i �} 5. �� aa�znc�-„t,,.r� r��,...,,.,,,,,.,-.;.,iin��;,,,,i � &44 � � r,,,.,.7.izit,a n„�;a,,,-,+;.,i � 491 Page 6 Housing Commission Housing Element Study Session February 12,2014 Size Max. Current Land Use Current - No Sites Acldress Density (acres) �DU/gr. ac.) Designation Zoning �� aa�zti c�„�,,,,-,� r,,,,-„-,.,,,,,,.;.,i i n��;,,,,i ��. . � r-,,,,,,,i.Ri<,a �- � r�„�;a„r,-,.,i � 6. cr� �,,,.,.,;�-,,,.,, �aann c+„�r,,,.,� r,,.,.,.,,.,.,,,,,,,;.,i i n��;,,,,i � 3� � � (',..,.,1. Rl�r.a n�n\ ��.,�.� 7. United 10025 E. Commercial/Office/ P(CG, Furniture Estates 0.92 25 Residential Res) United 10075 E. Commercial/Office/ P(CG, Furniture Estates 0.53 25 Residential Res) United 10075 E. Commercial/Office/ P(CG, Furniture Estates 0.86 25 Residential Res) 8. Barry Swenson 19160 Stevens Commercial/Office/ P(CG, Site Creek Blvd 0.55 25 Residential Res) 9. Loree Center 10029 Judy 0.43 25 Commercial/Office/ P(CG, Ave Residential Res) Loree Center 19060 Stevens Commercial/Office/ P(CG, Creek Blvd 0.86 25 Residential Res) 10. r,r,,,.,,,�,u,.,,�_ �9-59g �r�d�� '� --, �9 �5 n„ ;a,,,,�;.,i �} TR,-.,.l�t,R,..,� �� }�„�� ------� —--- � � � 1?„ ;,a.,,��'.,1 12^�\ .. �� 11. Glenbrook 10160 11.62 2p Med/High Density R3 A t. Parkwood (10-20) Glenbrook 21297 19.72 2p Med/High Density R3 A t. Parkwood (10-20) 12. The Villages 20800 Valley 5.35 2p Med/High Density R3 A t. Green Dr. (10-20) The Villages 20975 Valley 5.49 Zp Med/High Density R3 A t. Green Dr. (10-20) The Villages 20990 Valley 6 78 20 Med/High Density R3 A t. Green Dr. (10-20) The Villages 20800 Valley 2.69 2p Med/High Density R3 A t. Green Dr. (10-20) The Villages 20875 Valley 6.79 2p Med/High Density R3 A t. Green Dr. (10-20) 13. Carl Serg 20705 Valley Office/Industrial/ property Green Dr. 7.98 25 Commercial/ P(CG, Residential ML, Res) 492 Page 7 Housing Commission Housing Element Study Session February 12,2014 Sites Proposed By Property Owners Several property owners have indicated interest in being considered to be added to the Housing Element Sites Inventory list. Table 2 below identifies the sites and the current and desired development potential. Sites are listed in alphabetical order and are not in any particular order of priority. Details about the site criteria are available in Attachment HC-3. Table 2: Sites Pro�osed Bv Propertv Owners Existing Desired Current Land Site Size Density Density Use Current Current Use (acres) (DU/gr. �DU/acre) Designation Zoning ac.) Bateh Brothers (S-W ±0.67 15 20—35 Commercial/ P(CG) Convenience corner of Foothill Residential store Blvd & Stevens Creek Blvd) Cupertino Village ±12 25 35—40 Commercial/ P(CG, Res) Commercial Residential stri mall Foothill Market ±1.3 15 20—25 Commercial/ P(CG) Commercial (Stevens Canyon Rd Residential strip mall at McClellan Rd) Marina Plaza ±4.35 25 25—40 Commercial/ P(CG, Res) Commercial Residential stri mall Market Place ±9.9 25 25—35 Commercial/ P(CG, Res) Three newer& Residential one aging commercial buildin Stevens Creek Office ±4.8 25 35 Commercial/ P(CG,Res) Office Center Residential buildin s The Hamptons ±12 25 65-110 High density P(Res) Apartment residentia120- complex with 35 DU/ r ac 342 units Vallco Mall ±35 35 No Commercial/ P(Regional Indoor Mall chan e Residential Sho in ) Wonderland ±1.83 None/ 1-5 20—25 Quasi-public/ BQ/R1-10 Pre-school/ Chinese School & Institutional & After-school & 10921 Maxine Low Density Single family Avenue Residential home Yamagami's ±2.33 15 25—40 Commercial/ P(CG, Res Commercial Nursery Office/ 5-15) strip mall and Residential nurse 493 Page 8 Housing Commission Housing Element Study Session February 12,2014 Sites Proposed By Workshop Participants In addition to the sites that have been proposed by property owners, participants at the January 23, 2014 workshop identified several other sites as having potential for residential development or redevelopment. These sites have been provided in Table 3 below. Sites are listed in alphabetical order and are not in any particular order of priority. Details about the site criteria are available in Attachment HC-3. Table 3: Sites Pro�osed B�Worksho� Partici�ants Site Size Current Current Land Current Current Comments (acres) Density Use Zoning Use (DU/gr. Designation acre) 21731 Stevens 0.62 4.4—12 Neighborhood P(CN, Strip mall Martial Arts school, dry Creek Blvd (Next Commercial, ML, Res cleaners and beauty salon to Post Office) Industrial and 4.4-12) Residential 76 gas station and ±0.7 25 Commercial/ P(CG, Gas station Odd shaped site. adjacent office Residential ML, and office building (10625 N. Res) building De Anza Blvd & 20545 Valley Green Ave) Abundant Life ±3.8 25 Commercial/ P(CG, Church This site was considered Church (N. Residential Res) as a Housing Element site Stelling Road) in the 2007-2014 planning cycle. At that time the property owners had not ex ressed interest Caltrans (on Bubb ±2.9 20 Industrial/ ML-rc Service/ This property owned by Road) Residential Corp. Yard the State of CA is used as their Cor . Yard. Cupertino ±14.7 25 Commercial/ P(CG, Shopping A portion of the site was Crossroads Residential Res) Center recently redeveloped and the balance of the site is mostly tenanted with the exception of one or two tenant s aces. Cupertino ±4.4 25 Commercial/ P(CG, Office This site has recently been Financial Center Residential OP, complex acquired by JP Morgan (NE corner of Res) and has an office Wolfe and SCB) buildin . 494 Page 9 Housing Commission Housing Element Study Session February 12,2014 Site Size Current Current Land Current Current Comments (acres) Density Use Zoning Use (DU/gr. Designation acre) Cypress Hotel ±1.3 25 Commercial/ P(CG, Hotel Site is developed with a Residential Res) hotel that has property lines contiguous with its foot rint. Evulich Ct @ Linda ±2.5 5 Low Density R1-7.5 Single Older homes on Vista Dr Residential Famil underdevelo ed lots Good Samaritan ±1.36 25 Quasi-public/ BQ Church Existing Church Church Institutional (Homestead Rd) Homestead Lanes ±4.6 35 Commercial/ P(Rec, Bowling Older shopping center and adjacent sites Residential Enter) & alley & (20990, 20956 & P(CG) adjacent 20916 Homestead) stri malls Homestead Road ±5.4 15 Commercial/ P(CG) Office May be an appropriate (21020, 21040, Residential buildings, multi-family housing site 21060, 21070 parking lot at a higher density. Homestead and and tennis APN: 326 07 036 courts and 326 07 033) Main Street (East ±11.5 25 Commercial/ P(CG, Mixed use Site is currently under of Finch Ave) Residential OP, with hotel, construction pursuant to Res) commercial entitlements that the and office property owner received in 2012. Oaks Shopping ±7.9 25 Commercial/ P(CG, Strip mall Site has entitlements for a Center Residential Res) and theater mixed use office building and hotel which expires in Se t. 2014. PG&E Service ±21.6 N/A Quasi-public/ BQ Corp. Yard PG&E has not expressed Yard (N. Blaney Institutional interest in redevelopment Ave) of site PG&E lower ±10.6 N/A Quasi-public/ A Power PG&E has not expressed Substation (CA Institutional Substation interest in redevelopment Oak Wa ) of site Portal Plaza ±5.22 25 Commercial/ P(CG, Strip mall Shopping Center. (Between Portal& Residential Res) Minimal vacancy at this Perimefer) site. 495 Page 10 Housing Commission Housing Element Study Session February 12,2014 Site Size Current Current Land Current Current Comments (acres) Density Use Zoning Use (DU/gr. Designation acre) Post Office site ±5.2 4.4—12 Neighborhood P(CN, Post Office This site is owned by the Commercial, ML, Res US Postal Service. Industrial and 4.4-12) Residential St. Joseph's Place ±2.2 25 Commercial/ P(CG, Strip mall Older shopping center (Cafe Torre site) Residential Res) Union Church of ±3 25 Commercial/ P(CG, Church, Existing Church with Cupertino Residential Res) Pre-school historic designation. This (Stevens Creek site has recently added an Blvd) annex building to increase services at the site. Village Green ±7.5 16 High Density R3 Existing Based on R3 zoning, Apartments Mttlti-family apartment maximum yield is 161 residential (20- coinplex units. For HCD's 35 DU/gross with 122 purposes, realistic yield is acre) units 137 units. Therefore, this property has the potential to add 16 more units. Very low yield. Open space availability needs to be studied. Vivi s Falafel 0.44 4.4—12 Neighborhood P(CN, Strip mall Restaurant and shoe (21771 Stevens Commercial, ML, Res repair store. Creek Blvd/Next Industrial and 4.4-12) to Post Office) Residential PUBLIC NOTICING & OUTREP.CH Stakeholder Interviezvs Stakeholder interviews were conducted on December 11 & 12, 2013 to solicit input from stakeholders ranging from community members, property owners, housing developers, service providers, School Districts and the business community. A summary of common themes from the interviews is attached as Attachment HC-4. Summa��of January 23 Joint PC/HC Workshop On January 23, the Planning Commission and Housing Commission hosted a joint workshop to begin the Housing Element Sites discussion. Eleven participants broke into small groups and identified potential future sites for housulg and criteria for increased 496 Page 11 Housing Commission Housing Element Study Session February 12,2014 density in certain areas including communify benefits. Participants drew on maps and placed stickers to identify potential housing sites. See Attachment HC-5 for transcribed comments from the January 23rd small group discussions and Attachment HC-2 for a consolidated map of potential housing sites. The following table summarizes the noticing for this meeting: Notice A enda ■ Email sent to all interested parties ■ Posted on the City's official notice bulletin signed up through the project board (one zveek prior to the hearing) website ■ Posted on the City of Cupertino's Web ■ Letters sent to current Housing site (one week prior to the hearing) Element site property owners and ■ Posted on the project Website (one week interested property owners prior to hearing) CONCLUSION The goal for this study session is to review the sites that have been presented to date, identify any other new potential sites for consideration, to, potentially, rank the sites in order of preference with the understanding that sites must be chosen such that the cumulative yield of all the sites picked add up to a total of 1,064 units to make a recommendation to Planning Commission on priority housing sites that should be considered to meet the RHNA. Prepared by: MIG, Consultant to the City of Cupertino Piu Ghosh, AICP, Senior Planner Reviewed by: Approved by: /s/Garv Chao /s/Aarti Shrivastava Gary Chao Aarti Shrivastava City Planner Community Development Director Attachments HC-1. VTA PDA Map HC-2. Consolidated Sites Map—Potential 2015-2023 Housing Element Sites HC-3. Site Criteria Matrix HC-4. Common themes from Stakeholder interviews HC-5. Transcribed comments from January 23, 2014 meeting 497 ATTACHMENT PC- 2 r ' ••` � - 1 ' � � � •�-•. SUNNYVALE • � � / '� � �. � •�, � � LO S A LTO S ``�„�„�, ' HOMESTEAD RD � ; ' � . .�.. ��_� � �. ��_ ____ � � .--_�...�.. ti_.. .. . � �..�...�..�_ . , � . . . . ; • � • _ .__.. , � ` . r"__"` �..L � .. � � ,'• i , ` : ` , � 'j r , I � ' �• •� �-- . f j 1 , ' • 1 \ � J �•• • , � . � _ � 1 .•�• • •,� � I � . � ' � .S ' � � •��• � /U�..�„�� •• �� '--------, � ..� �,M.c..� . °„�.�r .�: ' ♦ . j�, Fi ./ �� , I ,,.. �i .� '�/ � '�' �� .i� � � i . .. � � R � • . .. � �___,_ _ y� . � ♦ � ... r � vALLEY�R�` ' �.� _ _ ERID .i � � �:.L ` � ti � � � ffN . ,, � .� �.,--N �, GE qVE _, _� • .. � •. a < �-------.�, ; p: - ��.. �� •�� -. 7 � � �� .�• :�� Q� I � � �� Q � 0 Q+, w �t � �. I � ` � � Q Q W� � ~'! � .• } m m z; F z; : X SANTA ♦ � ? • Q� � �' � W , 4 � CLARA 0 •�.�` SALEM q E � - 22 � m a �� °; v � �rG �1LVES� R � � :U�QLLGOp� � W �`�•. '7 ��,� ? � � ��" • LY . �•■ �� G � � Eyr, j � Sit Not � � . . � ' ' _:._.t� : .,..____J �..._ "�" C�. Availa6le. Q __ � � u,i ;. __ - -_ _._.__... __ -- _ ' �.! / _..___. . _ > STEVENS CREEK BLVD �, ( �� __.._ ' _F_ �; - —— ——— —— —— Q , �.��,, �, -..� _L.. � - � Q ; 7; � '��- -� , �. W , .. � i 'Lii'L1�IW$ ' w'�L..��. '�` m r . � , °' CL O� � ' �t7 , : . . �i�; � C �! S � • � � . `� � ; _ -r�` 1 �N� J ,;E-.:^: 00 �'� > 1 W ¢ . , �;� •_ a � ¢ ' i � > ` I— r f: , W N . Q � iT� �`'` l ' � � MC�LELLAN RD f- Z , i v � ; ;h" � �, Q ? ;<.. �..._.._.._..� o , Z : LL ,...� , - `� � W ..._ -.. W LL ✓� " - 4 — "�. > • I ' ,` Q � i: �. % .,�* W � I HYANNISPORT DR �■.�■� ` "'�� • cr' : ' ' • .� �• B� o � `� �., � � '�� ...�..��•.�••�••�..�..�,.�►�ER RD '11 `..• f '�•.� i.�■.�..�..�' � . . � � �� ' � . i :. ` . . �..�..�..�..�..�r tp . '.. H m `_ � � � I ` � �- m L, �"' r� i ' � •'� . p �=� /: .. . • �„'r i• � J µ . / r . .. � . I _ _ �: ; f � ' •' '' SAN JOSE _ „_., ..�..�..�„�..�••Z�..� ° � � RAINBOW DR ..�..� f� `6 � ' /•. ti ;_.._.._. '��,. � STEVENSCREEK I J •� " � r' RESERVOIR � � � � � �k Site Note: � I ' I r '1� j I r' N ._.i ' ..�N��.� PROSPECT RD { � Previousfy �=r!o�r-v�� :rt� �.,.ticc: : • • the Yamagarni s site I L•'1 "�"��" —__----__ � J -+ Soo �,600 � Prepared by: MIG, liic. zoi3; Source: City of Cupertiriu (,IS, zoi4 i � � SARATOGA �� "'-� Feet / ��..� City Boundary Existing Housing Element Sites � Sites Proposed by Property Owner priority Sites based on Housing WaterFeature Existing Housing Element Sites(Available) � Sites Proposed by Workshop Participants ❑ Commission Workshop (ozI�2I�4) VTA Priority Development Area (PDA) Former Housing Element Sites r��ti Conflictin Consensus based on Housin ' Recommended for Removal � Site Number: Realistic Capacity � � g g � Freeways � � See attached list for Site Number. Realistic capacity is 85%of ��a Commission Workshop(ozI�ZI�4) Major Roads � Lot Consolidation Potential maximum capacity,consistent with the Housing Element. � Existin and Potential Housin Sites ��PEAr,�o g g Potential Housing Element Sites-Housing Commission Workshop Exercise Legend: Le end: ATTACHMENT PC - 3 Prioirty Sites based on Housing Commision Workshop Feedback(02/12/14) Site available but not specifically identified as Prioirty site at Housing Commission Workshop(02/12/14) ^ � � � � � � �Prioirty Sites with conflicting consensus based on Housing Commision Workshop Feedback(02/12/14) E�eisti�tg-�IB-si Site no longer available or does not meet criteria. � � � � � HCD's Development Potential Criteria Secondary Criteria- SCS,Plan Bay Area&General Plan � � v � �, y Along Major ,� � ;� v Site Size& � v � � •� • v -� ,° � �- o Transportation � � � o °p Current Realistic Ownership a v '� ,..� � � ,� � � x � Site Current Existing � U v ,. Routes with access to v �? V {' Site Name Address Type of Site Land Use Potential for Potential& W �, � v � � NOTES Q o � o U o No. Zoning Use o � � transit or located � .�-'' •� v �. „ �. w; �. Designation Recycling Development � ,� � o � � � C7 ;� C7 � C7 Density z V within 1/2 mile of Q '� � � � u � � � VTA PDA � °w' °�-' �o � Q � �. c. Existing Sites in the 2007-2014 Housing Element(+Consolidation Sites) Commercial/ 19875 Stevens Recent im rovements made to the - -Ftrrn'rhnr29A0-- - Creek Blvd --ExiatirtgI-�Esite --Offic�{- P(£�Res - -'� -. - -'�(- --- -- -. �- �- -- .�-.�-. - -'� �if -. � -�.- - - � --`L5- �39-----build ng and property. -. - Residential 1 Commercial/ 19855 Stevens Site too small for development of any ._ __ ��y�- — — -- �:��,�-F�:-�—��._ r�c-�� — �� _. _.� ._. _ __ �.. �� _ ...... �,� _ —,� .�. _ ..._ ,.�_ � _ c� �� —5-- ———— ———— —— Creek Blvd substantial mixed use development. Residential Commercial/ Shaan Restaurant 20007 Stevens � � � 2 Existing HE site Office/ P(CG,Res) � � � � � � 1.35 25 Retain. (Erstwhile I-Restaurant) Creek Blvd Residential 10041 N.Blaney Commercial/ L2 Q-Mart New site Office/ P(CG,Res) � � � � � � � 25 36 These two small sites are located adjacent � � '� Ave Residential to an existing Housing Element site.One of the sites is owned by the same property Commercial/ owner.Recommend including in Housing 20021 Stevens Element sites invento at worksho L2 China Dance Studio New site Office/ P(CG,Res) � � � � � � 25 ry p• � � � Creek Blvd Residential Commercial/ 7-11 site behind Site recent�entitled with a commercial --�— — —— — — -- — reo�sat�tr�vaq �ctsrn,�� —-efitre� ——��e��E� .--�— — — -- �- — —— �- — — — —�— — —�— ;{-- i _. -� -- —_ �_ �.rr _ �— — �__ — Bombay Oven development Residential Commercial/ 20030Stevens _ __ __ � � � � _, � � � _ _ _ _ _ _ - �rancfi8uffe�oas- - ---- .xistitig t��sife �Uff�ice/- 1'tC�ResT` - � � _. _- --_ _.. _. -- - - - - ..� __. _.__ �,� ___ --- _ Tlb- `�2� Creek Blvd Residential Commercial/ Sites have developed with mixed use Lackey Prop.(SCB& 4r,- - - -- - - }9fl','�-�lancy-Aro�e iatiirgF�E site -�3ffieq` - I'(f6;Rrs - -# -- _ -_ --�C- - - - -�1- - - - �- - - d- -^� ---�--- (�-3 2s -� - eaic}enti�rt e�kCvc}opmcnt i�n-cenjm►ctien Blaney) Residential with another adjacent site(Chili's) Commercial/ Lack�Pro�(SCB& - 7CICl'3�'S�la7Sep7�VLs�7cifitin�I-��'TC� -�ffic'�J' - I'j��I�S) � -_ - - -- -- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - f.36 �5' - - - - � - __ � _._ __ _.. ._. _ _ Blaney) Residential Potential Housing Element Sites-Housing Commission Workshop Exercise-February 12,2014 Legend: Legend: �—_�Prioirty Sites based on Housing Commision Workshop Feedback(02/12/14) Site available but not specifically identified as Prioirty site at Housing Commission Workshop(02/12/14) �... � � � � � � � �Prioirty Sites with conflicting consensus based on Housing Commision Workshop Feedback(02/12/14) F�rn4�g-�IE-r�i Site no longer available or does not meet criteria. � � � � HCD's Development Potential Giteria Secondary Criteria- SCS,Plan Bay Area&General Plan a�, ro : �' � �, y Along Major ,Y � '�.° v Site Size& � v _v � •� '� .� � ° +� � � Trans ortation � � o Current Realistic Ownership Q• v q „°� p � � � � � x z Site Current Existin � v Routes with access to a+ Q Site Name Address Type of Site Land Use g Potential for Potential& W �, � v � � NOTES � o � o U o No. Zonin g U s e o ;.• � w t r a n si t or loca te d � .�'' a, �. v w ;; •• Designation Recycling Development � ,� �. o N � � C� a C� � C� e° U within 1/2 mile of � ' � � Density �� z VTA PDA Q � �' � � �x � ¢ d 0 .� C. Commercial/ 20010 Stevens Site too small for devel�ment of any �b-earr�er'af 9eB'��ta --- -- Rtsth'rg�fL�sit ��fffie� 'i'(�;�esp' -,�-- -- --�--- - -�(--- -�i - �'.v,� �}- � -'d'.-- "'Q.47' 25 --g - - --- Creek Blvd substantial mixed use development. Residential Commercial/ 19930 Stevens � - - -� xjsti H�E ' -C-3ffieeJ- 6;�es - -- - - - - - -- - --- v __ � �, �� ---- $$�4�-2�- -'}- � , _ � �. � _ �_ - � e.._ -- - - - -- �� Creek Blvd 9 � � Residential s �l J J J J x J These sites are not a corner lot and have Commercial/ 19936 Stevens less abiliYto be develo�ed into a __ _ _ � - -�1r�a-�arlrn-r�I_,at ------ istii�f-tE s�te -(3ffic'ef- I'�G�Res - - - - -. -- - - -, .-- --- � - - - - - -- -- 8"9 -23- -Yd'- - - � - - - Creek Blvd successful mixed use development in the Residential middle of the block that it is located on. 19900 Stevens Commercial/ Er --�l;�t��tttrr- --- ---- x�sEirtgH�site -(34fier{- �(CFr,4�es - �- - --�- - -�-- --�---- �- �C ---'�-- 3-9 2rr -4E� - .._. __ ._ _ -- � � �.�� , ---- --_. : __ � Creek Blvd Residential Commercial/ United Fumiture 10025 E.Estates ExisHng HE site Office/ P(CG,Res) 0.92 25 � � � Residential Commercial/ 7 United Furniture 10075 E.Estates Existing HE site Office/ P(CG,Res) � � � � � � � 0.53 25 58 Retain. � � � Residential Commercial/ United Fumiture 10075 E.Estates Existing HE site Office/ P(CG,Res) 0.86 25 1� � � Residential Commercial/ L7 East of E.Estates 19541 Richwood Dr. New site Office/ P(CG,Res) � � � � � � � 25 � � � Residential These three sites in conjunction with the Commercial/ United Furniture site could allow a better 19550 Stevens L7 East of E.Estates Creek Blvd New site Office/ P(CG,Res) � � � � � � � 25 45 designed mixed use development.Some � � � Residential of these properties are owned by the same familv ac thP TTnitPrl Fi�rnihirv citvc Page 2 of 8 Potential Housing Element Sites-Housing Commission Workshop Exercise-February 12,2014 Legend: Legend: � �Prioirty Sites based on Housing Commision Workshop Feedback(02/12/14) Site available but not specifically identified as Prioirty site at Housing Commission Workshop(02/12/14) � � � � � � � �Prioirty Sites with conflicting consensus based on Housing Commision Workshop Feedback(02/12/14) Extsti�tg-HF�si Site no longer available or does not meet criteria. � � � � � HCD's Development Potential Criteria Secondary Criteria- SCS,Plan Bay Area&General Plan � v � �, �, Along Major ,� � ;; a, Site Size& � v v � •� • v � ° � �- o Transportation � � � o °A Current Realistic Ownership o. �, '� ,.� � ;� ,� x � Site Current Existing � U v .. Routes with access to v Q `� � � � Site Name Address T e of Site Land Use Potential for Potential& w � v � v NOTES � 3 3 U 3 No. yp Zonin Use o � � � � ° ° g Q � transit or located � v ° v �. ;; w Designation Recycling Development � ,� � o �� e (� Density � v U within 1/2 mile of v '� q q � � � z VTA PDA Q � °-�' °= � o � Q �. C. -"-- v .,...�„_._.�.............�.,_....,. Commercial/ L7 East of E.Estates 10055 Miller Ave New site Office/ P(CG,Res) � � � � J J � 25 � � � Residential Commercial/ This half acre site while is not ideal;is , 19160 Stevens � J X ,� � X � 0.55 25 11 �ocated next to an existing affordable � � J � 8 Barry Swenson Site Existing HE site Office/ P(CG,Res) housing development and has generated � Creek Blvd Residential some interest in the past from developers. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Commercial/ I Loree Center 10029 Judy Ave Existing HE site Office/ P(CG,Res) 0.43 25 � � � Residential Property has recently been renovated and � 9 1� � � 1� � � � 27 retenanted.There is very little vacancy at Commercial/ this center. I 19060 Stevens Loree Center Existing HE site Office/ P(CG,Res) 0.86 25 � � � ' Creek Blvd Residenrial ` I� � � � � � � � — — — — � � � — — — — — — � — — — — — — — � — � � � � � � � � � � � — � � — — � � — � � � — — — Industrial/ ,_,_ — �Yla�le�-B�es— —�05A0-grtr�e�idb x-i�i�iiE s:�e — - �n4u,� , � �_ __ __ r _ _. _. .+ ._ _... � -- . — —._ � — —— -��— �� r �. � s _ ,� � � � .� ___ � —. � _ � � s .._ a _ Residential Entitlements obtained for an office 10 � X � � � � � 179 campus project(Apple Campus 2). Industrial/ Construction underway. .._ _ �,i•o�ey--eros— -�e4ee�'rur�ersd�g�-�xssti„�-I�-sitn —--—— — r`�Iv1�r.'es) —. _ � __ _ — —— —— — — — — — — — . — — — — — —— �9 -R�- _ �. __. _ � _ _ __ — � _ _ — — — — - — _ � _ �. � __ Residential Med/High Density Glenbrook Apt. 10160 Parkwood F.�cisting HE site R3 11.62 25 � � � Residential 11 (io-Zo� � J J J J J J 9s Retain. Med/High Density Glenbrook Apt. 21297 Parkwood Existing HE site R3 19.72 25 � � � Residential 10-20 Page 3 of 8 Potential Housing Element Sites-Housing Commission Workshop Exercise-February 12,2014 Legend: Legend: Prioirty Sites based on Housing Commision Workshop Feedback(02/12/14) Site available but not specifically identified as Prioirty site at Housing Commission Workshop(02/12/14) ^ � � � � � � � �Prioirty Sites with conflicting consensus based on Housing Commision Warkshop Feedback(02/12/14) E�eis4i�tg-�IF�-si Site no longer available or does not meet criteria. � � � � Secondary Criteria- HCD's Development Potential Criteria SCS,Plan Bay Area&General Plan � a a, � �, �, Along Major y'� � ° v Site Size& � � � � • ' °J � Current Realistic Ownershi a, � •� o Transportation � � � � � � � � Site Current Existing p � �j w Routes with access to �+ p U *' Site Name Address Type of Site Land Use Potential for Potential& W � � v � � NOTES � o � o U o No. Zoning Use o � � � �• „ �• Desi ation Rec clin Develo ment �' '� ,� o transit or located � .N •� ro � � � � � y g p � '� v v within 1/2 mile of v '� C � m Density � � z VTA PDA Q � �' �' "' 'o Q � Q �. c. ' — — — — — — — — — — — — — —Iv'rd/rtigh — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — � ♦ 20800 Valley Green Density � / The Villages Apt. Dr Existing HE site Residential � 5.35 25 � � � ` � (10-20) � Med/High � 20975 Valley Green Density The Villages Apt. Existing HE site R3 5.49 25 � � � � Dr. Residential ( (10-20) ' Med/High 20990 Valley Green Density 12 The Villages Apt. Existing HE site R3 � J J � � � X 6.78 25 62 Retain. � � � � Dr. Residential � (10-20) � Med/High 20800 Valley Green Density � The Villages Apt. pr Existing HE site Residential � 2.69 25 � � � � (10-20) � Med/High � 20875 Valley Green Density ' The Villages Apt. Existing HE site R3 6.79 25 J J � � Dr. Residential ' ♦ (10-20 � � _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ offi�e, 20705 Valley Green Industrial/ P(CG,ML, I 13 Carl Berg property Existing HE site � � 1� � � � � 7.98 25 169 Retain. � � � Dr. Commercial/ Res) t Residential Property Owner Development Interest Sites (+Consolidation sites) Property Owner 22690 Stevens Commercial/ Existing convenience store and Pl Bateh Brothers Development P(CG) � � � X X � X 0.67 20-35 11-19 X X � Creek Blvd Residential undeveloped site. Interest � Property Owner Shopping center.Additionally,24,000 s.f. 10825-10983 N CommerciaU � P2 Cupertino Village Development P(CG,Res) J J � � � � � 10.8 35-45 321-413 commercial in two buildings and one X � � Wolfe Rd Residential � Interest parking garage approved. Page 4 of 8 Potential Housing Element Sites-Housing Commission Workshop Exercise-February 12,2014 Legend: Legend: Prioirty Sites based on Housing Commision Workshop Feedback(02/12/14) Site available but not specifically identified as Prioirty site at Housing Commission Workshop(02/12/14) �.. � � � � � � �Prioirty Sites with conflicting consensus based on Housing Commision Workshop Feedback(02/12/14) Exts4i�tg.�IE-si Site no longer available or does not meet criteria. � � � � � Secondary Criteria- HCD's Development Potential Criteria SCS,Plan Bay Area&General Plan � C a � ti y Along Major � � ;: v Site Size& � v � � •� • °J ^� Current Realistic Ownership �,., � •� Fo Transportation � � � � o � � � Site Current Existing � U v ,. Routes with access to v Q � Site Name Address T e of Site Land Use Potential for Potential& w � v � U NOTES � 3 3 U 3 No. yp Zoning Use o ,��, Q w transit or located � .�'' � � o � o � o Designation Recycling Development � � o � � ,� C7 � C7 � C� Density y � v U within 1/2 mile of � � � � w � � � � z VTA PDA Q � 61 °= o � � � � c. Foothill C�McClellan Property Owner 10625 S Foothill Commercial/ P3 Center(Foothill Development P(CG) � � � X X X X 1.3 20-25 22-27 Strip mall. X X � Blvd Residential Market) Interest Property Owner 10118 Bandley Commercial/ P4 Marina Plaza Development � � � � � � � 6.86 25-40 145-232 Commercial center � 35 DUA-� 40DUA- Drive Residential Interest Property Owner Stevens Creek Office 20823 Stevens CommerciaU P5 Development P(CG,Res) � � J J � X � 6.31 35 241 Office complex X 35 DUA-� � Center Creek Blvd Residential Interest Property Owner High Density 19500 Pruneridge Existing 342 unit apartment complex on 110 DUA P6 'The Hamptons Development Residential P(Res) X � J J � � � 12.44 65-110 686-1162 X 65 DUA-� � Ave �terest (20-35) site. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Property Owner Existing indoor mall with high vacancy , Commercial/ P(Regional J J � � P7 Vallco Mall 10123 N Wolfe Rd Development � � J J � � � 32.9 35 600-800 rate with Sears and Macy's as anchor Residential Shopping) Interest tenants. ' � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Property Owner Commercial/ Summerwinds& 1471,1491&1505 S P(CG,IZes 5- P8 Development Office/ � � X X X � � 413 25-40 87-140 Nursery and building materials retaiL � 35 DUA-� 40 DUA-� Granite Rock" De Anza Blvd 15) Interest Residential Property Owner Commercial/ 1451 S.De Anza P(CG,Res 5- LP8 Jack in the Box Development Office/ � � X X X � � 0.44 25-40 9-14 Jack in the Box � 35 DUA-� 40 DUA-� Blvd Interest Residential 15) Quasi-public/ Wonderland Chinese Property Owner 10931 and 10921 Institutional& Pre-school/Aftervschool care and single P9 School and 10921 Development BQ/K1-10 � � X X � X X 1.83 20-25 31-38 X X 25 DUA-� Maxine Ave Low Density family residence Maxine Interest Residential Property O��ncr Marketplace Shopping 19750 and 19620 Commercial/ Three newer and one older commercial P10 Development P(CG,Res) � X � � J J �1 9.92 2�-35 210-295 �� Centcr Stevens Creek Blvd Kcsidential building Interest Page S of 8 Potential Housing Element Sites-Housing Commission Workshop Exercise-February 12,2014 Legend: Legend: �— Prioirty Sites based on Housing Commision Workshop Feedback(02/12/14) Site available but not specifically identified as Prioirty site at Housing Commission Workshop(02/12/14) � � � � � � � �Prioirty Sites with conflicting consensus based on Housing Commision Workshop Feedback(02/12/14) E�re:s4it1�HE-si Site no longer available or does not meet criteria. � � � � � Secondary Criteria- HCD's Development Potential Criteria SCS,Plan Bay Area&General Plan � � � y y Along Major w � '�.° � Site Size& � v ?; Q • ' °1 ^� ° a- �- o Transportation � � � o °q Current Realistic Ownershi Q. � '� � � � � � :� x � Site Current Existin p � 01 v � Aoutes with access to �+ Q e° *' Site Name Address Type of Site Land Use g Potential for Potential& w �, � a � � � NOTES � o � o U o No. Zoning Use o :�-� � C � .a,.' �• ,. transit or located aw,, �. v .. Designation Recycling Development � ,� � o �� ,e C� ;� C� � C� Densit � v U w i t h i n 1/2 m i l e o f v ';� � � � y � � z VTA PDA Q � " °= �o � ¢ � �. a Sites Identified at Housing Element Workshops (1/23/14 and 2/12/14) � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �eigTi6orTioo� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 21731 Stevens Creek Additional � 21731 Stevens Commercial, P(CN,ML, � Wl Blvd(Next to Post Potential Site � � X � � X � 0.62 4.4-12 2-6 Strip mall � � � ' Office Creek Blvd orksho �dustrial& Res 4.4-12) � � � p� R 'd ia � 76 Gas Station/Office Additional 10625 N De Anza Commercial/ P(CG,ML, W2 Bldg(DeAnza and Potential Site � X X � � � � 0.7 25 10 76 Gas station and adjacent office building � � � Blvd Residential Res) Valley Green) (Workshop) Additional Commercial/ W3 Abundant Life Church 10100 N Stelling Rd Potential Site P(CG,Res) J J � � � X � 3.8 25 80 Church&Pre-school � � � IZesidential Worksho ) Additional Caltrans Maintenance Industrial/ W4 10730 Bubb Rd Potential Site ML-rc J J � � � X � 2.93 20 49 Caltrans Corp.Yard � � � Station Residential (Worksho ) Additional Bulk of site recently renovated.Rest of site 10041 S De Anza Commercial/ W5 Cupertino Crossroads Potential Site P(CG,Res) � X � � � � � 14.7 25 312 mostly tenanted with one or two � � � Blvd Ilesidential (Worksho ) vacancies. Cupertino Financial Additional Commercial/ P(CG,OP, Office buildings recently acquired by JP W6 Center(NE corner of 10050 N.Wolfe I2d Potential Site � X � � �1 � � 4.44 25 94 � � � Residential Res) Morgan. Wolfe and SCB) (Worksho ) Additional 10050 S De Anza Commercial/ Hotel with property lines contiguous with W7 Cypress Hotel Potential Site P(CG,Res) � X X � � X � 1.32 25 28 � � � Blvd llesidential hotel and parking garage. (Worksho ) Good Samaritan Additional 19624 Homestead Quasi-public/ W8 Church(Homestead& Potential Site BQ � � X � � � � 1.36 25 28 Church � � � Rd Institutional Wolfe) (Worksho ) 10857,10867,10877, Additional Evulich Ct @ Linda Low Density Single family homes and undeveloped W9 ]0887 Linda Vista Potential Site R1-7.5 � � � X X � X 2.49 5 10 � � � Vista Dr Residential land. Dr (Worksho ) Additional Homestead Lanes+ 20916,20956,20990 Commercial/ P(Rec,Enter) W10 Potential Site J J � � � � � 4.61 20-35 78-137 Strip malls and bowling alley. � � � Adjacency Homestead Rd Residential &P(CG) (Worksho ) Homestead Road- 21020,21040,21060, Additional IntraHealth/Office/ 21070 Homestead Commercial/ Office and commercial buildings,tennis wl� Porenrsai s�re i��cc� J J J ,� J ,� ,� s.42 15 69 J ,� J Tennis Courts Rd&APN:326 07 Residential courts and parking lot. (Homestead/Stelling) 022,326 07 036 �Workshop) Page 6 of 8 Potential Housing Element Sites-Housing Commission Workshop Exercise-February 12,2014 Legend: Legend: Prioirty Sites based on Housing Commision Workshop Feedback(02/12/14) Site available but not specifically identified as Prioirty site at Housing Commission Workshop(02/12/14) ^ � � � � � � �Prioirty Sites with conflicting consensus based on Housing Commision Workshop Feedback(02/12/14) Exis!'tng-�IE-si Site no longer available or does not meet criteria. � � � � � HCD's Development Potential Criteria Secondary Criteria- SCS,Plan Bay Area&General Plan � .. a v � y y Along Major ,� � '�.° v Site Size& � v v ¢ • • 01 � Current Realistic Ownership �,, � •� lo Transportation � � C o °A Site Current Existin � v �,�. Routes with access to v �? � � � � x � Site Name Address Type of Site Land Use g Potential for Potential& w � � v � � � NOTES Q o � o V o No. Zonin Use o � � � ;; �. Designation g Recycling Development y .� � o transit or located ,N •� � � � � � � Densit � � U w i t h i n 1/2 m i l e o f v ��y G � � Y � � z VTA PDA Q � °1 °1 � o � � Q �. �, Main St(SCB btwn Additional Commercial/ P(CG,OP, Property has entitlements and is under W 12 APN:316 20 109 Potential Site � X � � � � � ll.57 25 245 construction for a mixed use office and � � � Finch/Tantau) Residential Res) (Workshop) commercial development and a hotel � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Additional Property has entitlements for a mixed use � 21255 Stevens Comtnercial/ W13 Oaks Shopping Center Potential Site P(CG,Res) � � � � � � � 7.9 25 167 office/commercial building and a hotel � � � � Creek Blvd Residential (Workshop) which expires in Sept 2014. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Additional PG&E Corporation Quasi-public/ PG&E has not shown an interest in W14 10820 N Blaney Ave Potential Site BQ � X � � � � � 21.6 N/A N/A X X X Yard Institutional redeveloping this property. (Worksho ) Additional PG&E Lower California Oak Way Quasi-public/ PG&E has not shown an interest in W15 Potential Site A � X � X X X X 10.56 N/A N/A X X X Substation (APN:342 12 030) Institutional redeveloping this property. (Workshop) Portal Plaza Additional 19900 Steven Geek Commercial/ W16 (between Portal and Potential Site P(CG,Res) � � J J J J � 5.22 25 110 Commercial center with no vacancies. � � � Blvd Residential Perimeter) (Worksho ) Neighborhood Additional 21701 Stevens Commercial, P(CN,ML, W17 U.S.Yost Office Potential Site � X X X � � � 5.24 4.4-12 18-52 Owned by the US Postal Service. � � � Creek Blvd Industrial& Res 4.4-12) (Workshop) Residential Additional St.Joseph's Place(Cafe 20375 Stevens Commercial/ W78 Potential Site P(CG,Res) � � � � � X � 2.2 25 46 Commercial center with no vacancies. � � � Torre site) Creek Blvd Residential (Worksho ) Additional Church with a historic designation.This Union Church of 20900 Stevens Commercial/ Wl9 Potential Site P(CG,Res) � X � � � X � 3.05 25 63 site has also recently added a facility to � � � Cupertino Creek Blvd Residential (Worksho ) increase services. Existing 122 unit apartment complex. Additional High Density Village Green 21230 Homestead Developed at a density of-16 DU/acre. W20 Potential Site Residential R3 X X � � � X � 7.5 20-35 137 � � � Apartments Rd Open space availability needs to be (Workshop) (20-35) evaluated. Neighborhood Additional Vivi's Falafel 21771 Stevens Commercial, P(CN,ML, W21 Potential Site � � X � � � � 0.44 4.4-12 1-4 Strip mall �l � � (next to Post Officc) Creek Blvd Industrial& Res 4.4-12) (Workshop) Residential 1 ` 19376,19400,19450 Jiffy Lube+Office Blds Additional Commercial/ � dt 19480 Stevens Various office buildings and service uses �W22 (SE of Stevens Creek Potential Site Office/ P(CG,Res) � � J J � � �I 5.21 25 110 � � � I Creek Blvd&10062 (jiHy lube) , ' Blvd and Miller) Miller Ave �Workshop ti2) Residential ` � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Page 7 of 8 Potential Housing Element Sites-Housing Commission Workshop Exercise-February 12,2014 Legend: Legend: Prioirty Sites based on Housing Commision Workshop Feedback(02/12/14) Site available but not specifically identified as Prioirty site at Housing Commission Workshop(02/12/14) �... � � � � � � � � � � � �Prioirty Sites with conflicting consensus based on Housing Commision Workshop Feedback(02/12/14) ExisFea�IB-si Site no longer available or does not meet criteria. Secondary Criteria- HCD's Development Potential Criteria SCS,Plan Bay Area&General Plan � +. v � � � � �, y Along Major � � �• v Site Size& � �, � � � '� .� � ° � o Transportation � �s o Current Realistic Ownership o. v �� ,� � � � � � .� x � Site Current Existing � V v „ Routes with access to v Q Site Name Address Type of Site Land Use Potential for Potential& w � v � � � NOTES ¢ o � o U o No. Zoning Use o �'' � � transit or located � � v �. v �• °: �• Designation Recycling Development � ,� � o �� C7 R C7 � C7 Densit � v U within 1/2 mile of v �� y � � z VTA PDA Q � � °= o � Q Q � c, � _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 19200,19220& Additional Commercial/ Citibank,Sunflower Leaming Center,and , I W23 Opposite Main Street 19280 Stevens Potential Site Office/ P(CG,Res) � � � � � � � 4.98 25 105 older office blds � J J ' ` Creek Blvd (Workshop#2) Residential � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Modern Furniture+ Additional Commercial/ W24 Barn NE corner of SCB 20149 Stevens Potential Site Office/ P CG,Res � Creek Blvd � � J � � � � X � 0.63 25 13 Modern Furniture store � � � and Randy Ln) (Workshop#2) Residential JC Penney+Parking Additional Lot site(NE corner of 10150 N.Wolfe Itd Commercial/ P(Regional W25 Potential Site � � � � � � � 14.93 35 444 JC Penney and Parking Lot � � � N.Wolfe Road and &APN:316 20 092 Residential Shopping) Vallco Parkwa (Workshop#2) Additional Commercial/ 20745 Stevens W26 Target Potential Site Office/Residene P(CG,Ites) � X � � � X � 8.26 25 175 Target � �l � Creek Blvd (Worksho ) ntial Additional Park Circle 4-plexs Bound by Beardon W27 Potential Site Res MH(10-20) IZ3 X X � � � X � 7.1 20 120 Residential Duplexes � � � (North of Target) Dr.&Bandley Dr. (Worksho ) Additional Commercial/ 19330 Stevens W28 Kalio Potential Site Office/ P(CG,Res) � � � � � � � 0.84 25 17 Two story office building � � � Creek Blvd (Workshop) Residential *-Site previously erroneously listed as Yamagami's Nursery Site Page 8 of 8