Exhibit CC 12/02/2014 Oral Communicationsc c �zl�li�
Subject: Re: Recommended Housing Element Sites Identified as requested
+•—} From: Peter Pau (ppau@shpco.com)
To: barry4cupertino@gmaii.com;
cc: la -warren att.net;
Date: Tuesday, December 2, 20141:46 PM
(You know she is impossible to satisfy,
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 2, 2014, at 1:17 PM, Barry Chang 4 Cupertino City Council <barry4cupertino@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Lisa,
Thank you very much for your input.
Barry
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Lisa Warren <la-warren@att.net> wrote:
Planning, City Council, City Manager -
I was one of the attendees at the November 20, 2014 GPA/HEU Community
Workshop.
During the course of the evening, the planned 'agenda' was altered as member
of the community were anxious for a chance to ask questions and share
thoughts as an entire group as opposed to multiple guided round table
discussions.
As a result, the 'mapping exercise' that was planned by the city was not
completed.
I saw some value in having attendees give the input that this excersise would
have supplied, so after the meeting, I suggested to at least four different city
employees, including the City Manager and Asst. Manager, that an email be
sent to everyone that was sent the notification email about the Nov 20
workshop AND any new email addresses that were collected on the sign -in
sheet that evening. The email would contain an attachment with the map
image and a request that people identify sites/unit numbers at home and send
them in to the city.
I thought the feedback on that suggestion was positive, but I did not ever
receive such an email, and am fairly certain one did not get sent out. I was
disappointed I
That being said, I want to share with you a list that was the result of a'mapping
session' with myself and a few residents. This list is in no particular order and
the total of all highest unit numbers suggested is far larger than the desired
total of units to be included in the Housing Element. IF the high end of the
ranges is used sites with ranges, then other sites should be removed.
The goal is to end up with far LESS than the 1400 unit number that Staff keeps
mentioning. We see no need for that large of a'buffer'.
For example, IF Hamptons and Oaks are'maxed', then Glenbrook, Villages
and Foothill McClellan could be removed completely.- resulting in 1171 total
on 6 sites. That would be enough !!
• Hamptons 500-660
• Barry Swenson 11
• Granite Rock 120
• Marina Plaza 180
• Villages 62
• Glenbrook 93-228
• The Oaks 180-200
• Foothill @ McClellan 27 or more
Homestead Lanes was also considered as an option.
I hope that other such lists were created by residents.
Thank you,
Lisa Warren
Barry Chang
Cupertino City Councilmember
www.barrychang.com
barry4cupertino@gmail.com
408-688-6398
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
A* - AS
-H
PP P
jillill
WHAT IS HAPPENING TO
CUPERTINO ?
Where are the trees disappearing
What we have/had !!
• Well planned city
• Lots of trees
• Widerroads
• Lots of parking space
What we are used to
- More trees
45-60ft tall buildings
Stevens creek/Tantau crossing
Love to eat/shop
What is happening
Height/setback/trees
???
Another Poor example
r% r% C w- N%01%1,101
Height/setback/trees ???
':=fie
Few shrubs planted ??
ROSE BOWL
And Now:
'dyatt House Hotel development project H
- Proposal for 115 Redwood trees removal ?
- Building height increase for Hyatt
Behind JC Penny by 1280/Wolfe ramp
Healthy trees behind JCP
What is happening ??
Subject : Hyatt
House Hotel development project
Recommended Action:
5. Adopt Resolution No. 14-205 approving Parking Exception (EXC-2014-
07); and
6. Adopt Resolution No. 14-206 approving Tree Removal Permit (TR -
2014 -28); and
7. Adopt Resolution No. 14-207 approving Tree Removal Permit (TR -
2014 -40)
What to do ??
• STOP destroying the city
• STOP cutting down historic trees
• STOP raising building heights — no more than
60fte
• REQUIRE more building set -backs
• ADD more parks
• SPREAD the growth