The URL can be used to link to this page

CC Exhibit 12/02/2014 Item No. 212/2/2014 ■ In August 2012, the City Council directed staff to begin the General Plan Amendment in order to: — Replenish office and hotel allocation — Inform the Vallco Shopping District Specific Plan — Consolidate individual requests from property owners — Address State law requirements — Address other General Plan "clean up" items ■ Stevens Creek Office Center — Mixed use Commercial/office or Mixed use Commercial/Residential ■ City Center (Prometheus) — Office s.f. of up to 415,000 s.f. — Height increase to 9 stories (110 feet) ■ Cupertino Inn: — Height increase to 145 feet, 250-300 hotel rooms ■ Cupertino Village: — Height increase up to 6-7 stories for hotel — Request to be a Housing Element site (Council did not include site in Environmental Review as a Housing Element site) ■ Mirapath: — Commercial designation 12/2/2014 2 ■ In November 2013, the City initiated a State -mandated update to the Housing Element in order to: = Assess and update the Housing Plan — Identify sites that address the City's Regional Housing Needs Allocation — Make necessary changes to Municipal Code 12/2/2014 3 Schedule 1 Existing Conditions Background research, visioning workshop and Spring through Settings and Opportunities Report Summer 2013 2 Visioning and Alternatives Market Study, Retail Strategy, community input Summer and Concept Alternatives Report through Wintterer 2 2014 3 Draft GPA and Housing Element Draft GPA, Draft Housing Element and Winter through environmental analysis (EIR) Summer 2014 4 Public Hearings and Adoption Summer through Open house, formal public hearings, and final Fall 2014 GPA, EIR and HCD Draft Housing Element 12/2/2014 4 12/2/2014 Technical Analysis ■ Settings and Opportunities Report (Sept 2013) ■ Market Study (Oct 2013) ■ Retail Strategy (Feb 2014) Other Projects ■ Plan Bay Area (2013) ■ Climate Action Plan (pending) Community Input ■ Community -wide Workshops ■ Meetings, study sessions, open houses and hearings ■ Online comment forms, emails and letters Community Input Community Input ( Total Outrea Overall there were 24 public workshops, meetings, study sessions, open houses and public hearings on the project, and additional property owner outreach • City Council Meetings (February 19, 2012) • City Council Meeting (March 5, 2012) Community Workshop #1 (July 18, 2013) • Teen Commission Meeting (October 2, 2013) • Community Workshop #2 (October 23, 2013) • City Council Meeting (November 4, 2013) • Neighborhood Meeting (December 5, 2013) • Chamber of Commerce LAC meeting (December 6, 2013) • Bike and Pedestrian Commission Meeting (January 15, 2014) Joint Housing Commission and Planning Commission Meeting/Workshop (January 23, 2014) Chamber of Commerce Meeting (January 29, 2014) • Block Leader Meeting (January 29, 2014) • Chamber of Commerce LAC meeting (February 7, 2014) • Study Area Property Owner Meetings (various) • Housing Element site property owner meetings (various) • Housing Commission Study Session and Workshop (February 12, 2014) • Open House #1 (February 19, 2014) • Planning Commission Study Session on Housing Sites (February 19, 2014) • City Council Study Session on Housing Sites (March 3, 2014) • Housing Commission Meeting (March 19, 2014) • Joint Planning Commission/City Council study session (April 1, 2014) • Public Meeting for EIR (June 24, 2014) • Housing Commission Meeting (August 28, 2014) • Planning Commission Study Session on the EIR (September 9, 2014) • Open House #2 (September 16, 2014) • City Council Study Session on the EIR (October 7, 2014) • Planning Commission Hearings (October 12, 2014 and October 20, 2014) 12/2/2014 0 12/2/2014 Community Input f Mobility and in Approximately 170 people attended one of the following four workshops/meetings: ■ Community -wide Workshop #2 October 23, 2013 ■ Neighborhood Meeting December 5, 2013 ■ Chamber of Commerce Workshop January 29, 2014 ■ Neighborhood Block Leader's Meeting January 29, 2014 The purpose of the Community Design Survey was to test potential land use, design and mobility concepts for each major mixed-use corridors in Cupertino. The survey was comprised of three major categories: ■ Streetscapes and Mobility Enhancements ■ Parks and Plazas ■ Buildings and Land Uses 12/2/2014 Under each category, participants were shown a series of images and asked to respond to the following questions: 1. Do you like this idea for Cupertino? 2. Where would it be most appropriate? 12/2/2014 9 ----------------------------- ----------- �.. F n 12/2/2014 9 wsme rarzd,uc dmPmiN -•rJd :i:avl Ma ':'•ci*e�nl!>rq Mut 5gur—, UP ..�: IST. mW!a h�i<Yroe. miveJVSemi�dMYaY � [ 7B.fteateenualgYticna eaSo :A ^x :.«1me 12/2/2014 9 Title Image Results Appropriate Location Trail connection I really like it (49%) Homestead Road (11%) commercial Worth considering (31%) De Anza Boulevard (10%) district I don't like it (12%) Wolfe Road (6%) Not sure (8%) Stevens Creek (5%) All of the above (48%) None of the above (20%) Low rise 1 really like it (27%) Homestead Road (6%) commercial with Worth considering (33%) De Anza Boulevard (7%) parking in front I don't like it (29%) Wolfe Road (2%) Not sure (11%) Stevens Creek (11%) All of the above (45%) None of the above (30%) Low rise I really like it (33%) Homestead Road (4%) commercial with Worth considering (35%) De Anza Boulevard (3%) small street I don't like it (22%) Wolfe Road (2%) setback Not sure (10%) Stevens Creek (22%) All of the above (45%) None of the above (23%) Low rise I really like it (27%) Homestead Road (12%) commercial with Worth considering (37%) De Anza Boulevard (6%) street parking I don't like it (30%) Wolfe Road (4%) Not sure (7%) Stevens Creek (10%) All of the above (35%) None of the above (32%) Title Image Results Appropriate Location Mid rise outdoor I really like it (50%) Homestead Road (3%) commercial Worth considering (31%) De Anza Boulevard (S%) district I don't like it (17%) Wolfe Road (23%) Not sure (2%) Stevens Creek (16%) All of the above (32%) None of the above (23%) Mid rise outdoor I really like it (47%) Homestead Road (4%) commercial Worth considering (24%) De Anza Boulevard (4%) district I don't like it (20%) Wolfe Road (26%) Not sure (8%) Stevens Creek (15%) All of the above (31 %) None of the above (20%) Mid rise indoor I really like it (26%) Homestead Road (1%) shopping mall Worth considering (30%) De Anza Boulevard (0%) I don't like it (37%) Wolfe Road (40%) Not sure (6%) Stevens Creek (6%) All of the above (13%) None of the above (41 %) 12/2/2014 10 Title Image Low rise office Mid rise office Mid rise mixed use High rise office Title Image Low/mid rise hotel Mid rise hotel ............... _..... . Mid/high rise hotel x A,apE YM �> %C r� Results I really like it (18%) Worth considering (38%) 1 don't like it (37%) Not sure (8%) I really like it (36%) Worth considering (30%) 1 don't like it (28%) Not sure (6%) I really like it (43%) Worth considering (30%) 1 don't like it (22%) Not sure (4%) I really like it (27%) Worth considering (26%) 1 don't like it (44%) Not sure (4%) Results I really like it (28%) Worth considering (41%) 1 don't like it (25%) Not sure (6%) I really like it (30%) Worth considering (35%) 1 don't like it (28%) Not sure (7%) I really like it (36%) Worth considering (24%) 1 don't like it (35%) Not sure (6%) Appropriate Location Homestead Road (13%) De Anza Boulevard (7%) Wolfe Road (5%) Stevens Creek (6%) All of the above (32%) None of the above (37%) Homestead Road (4%) De Anza Boulevard (14%) Wolfe Road (13%) Stevens Creek (12%) All of the above (34%) None of the above (24%) Homestead Road (1%) De Anza Boulevard (9%) Wolfe Road (6%) Stevens Creek (13%) All of the above (42%) None of the above (27%) Homestead Road (3%) De Anza Boulevard (12%) Wolfe Road (6%) Stevens Creek (15%) All of the above (25%) None of the above (39%) Appropriate Location Homestead Road (10%) De Anza Boulevard (8%) Wolfe Road (15%) Stevens Creek (9%) All of the above (36%) None of the above (23%) Homestead Road (4%) De Anza Boulevard (16%) Wolfe Road (8%) Stevens Creek (5%) All of the above (43%) None of the above (25%) Homestead Road (4%) De Anza Boulevard (9%) Wolfe Road (17%) Stevens Creek (11 %) All of the above (25%) None of the above (33%) 12/2/2014 11 Title Image Results Appropriate Location Detached I really like it (27%) Homestead Road (27%) townhomes Worth considering (31%) De Anza Boulevard (4%) 1 don't like it (33%) Wolfe Road (2%) Not sure (8%) Stevens Creek (4%) All of the above (23%) None of the above (39%) Low rise `' I really like it (19%) Homestead Road (20%) residential Worth considering (35%) De Anza Boulevard (0%) 1 don't like it (40%) Wolfe Road (4%) Not sure (6%) Stevens Creek (5%) All of the above (30%) None of the above (41%) Mixed use I really like it (38%) Homestead Road (2%) residential and Worth considering (27%) De Anza Boulevard (2%) retail I don't like it (31%) Wolfe Road (11%) retail a Not sure (4%) Stevens Creek (12%) All of the above (48%) None of the above (26%) Mid rise mixed I really like it (38%) Homestead Road (1%) use residential Worth considering (31%) De Anza Boulevard (2%) and retail I don't like it (27%) Wolfe Road (16%) Not sure (4%) Stevens Creek (15%) All of the above (41 %) None of the above (24%) Title Image Results Appropriate Location Mid rise mixed- I really like it (34%) Homestead Road (6%) use residential Worth considering (24%) De Anza Boulevard (3%) I don't like it (40%) Wolfe Road (10%) Not sure (4%) Stevens Creek (9%) All of the above (35%) None of the above (37%) Mid/high rise I really like it (33%) Homestead Road (2%) residential lofts Worth considering (23%) De Anza Boulevard (5%) 1 don't like it (33%) Wolfe Road 01 %) Not sure (11 %) Stevens Creek (9%) All of the above (43%) None of the above (29%) Mid/high rise I really like it (29%) Homestead Road (2%) mixed-use Worth considering (19%) De Anza Boulevard (1%) residential and I don't like it (42%) Wolfe Road 01%) retail a Not sure (10%) Stevens Creek (8%) All of the above (31%) None of the above (46%) 12/2/2014 12 U „�nn•�?.z-x�,ti 4m+sb+tx..�,,.a»,o-,s.�,�« a.. .., t*�,v<.,�w,ur,,,.. u+c s.. w.aRII.�w.,�ud'�;a .. .�.,�a�� sem,. .,h!»n+w:� .. _..� sem- �x.. �:sP{ri�e. � au.xe(orR�vhlu xr. u+�".E�.rt ibl rd+uL..+sx a�xYS-,.+>.s.tx .n< w eaeN e .. Y�f u�wi Sys.. "'R �.. -.:.N S• ... xw 2�Y �•eC; Arnm5 aG..ar3lu'n+v+'ui*1 t7 � 0 V/Z/Z Y 12/2/2014 14 Neighborhood park Neighborhood retail Hotel Parking Residential over retail Retain Bowlmor and ice rink New greenways xr ,',- New offices Mixed use development New residential Pedestrian bridge to Mixed-use conned to Rose Bowl New central street Underground parking Greenways conned to enhanced perimeter trail _ttlmlffl, OV + -: 12/2/2014 14 12/2/2014 15 9 desired little or no changes 12/2/2014 16 12/2/2014 17 Some common themes that were repeated by many participants at the time included: ■ Future development in Cupertino should provide community benefits and not impact public services, in particular schools ■ Careful consideration needs to be taken for any new residential development in terms of its density, location and type (e.g., single family homes, senior housing, apartments or condos) ■ Increased building heights could be considered if they are not adjacent to existing residential neighborhoods ■ Transit, pedestrian and bicycle mobility needs to be expanded and made safer ■ The Vallco Shopping District should be redeveloped or re - tenanted to make it more economically successful and desirable to the Cupertino community 12/2/2014 W • State and Regional regulations and best practices: — Climate Change — Land Use and Transportation — Complete Streets and Connectivity — Performance Measures for Mobility — Sustainability — Housing Element 12/2/2014 19 • New Chapter Elements — Planning Areas • Reorganization and Updates — Land Use and Community Design — Mobility (previously "Circulation") — Recreation and Community Services (previously in Land Use and Community Design) — Infrastructure (previously in "Environmental Resources/ Sustainability") — Sustainability (previously "Environmental Resources/ Sustainability") — Health and Safety 1. What should city-wide Development Allocation be? 2. Should the City have a Community Benefits policy? 3. What should community form/heights be? 4. What should vision for Vallco be? 5. Which sites should be Priority Housing Sites? 12/2/2014 20 • City Council recognized lack of development allocation — City's office vacancy rate in Q3 2014 is 0.98%. Silicon Valley avg. is 10.38% — Many companies are being turned away for lack of space and existing companies have moved out due to lack of available space • Market Study was conducted to assess realistic economic demand • Indicates demand for: — 3.6 million sq. ft. of new office space — 985 hotel rooms — 4,421 residential units — No additional commercial space ., 4 $C \ �.le�- j- W r ✓ ,%Y� .. a\\ ak �'i.3.� d CD -. \ may__ 'Mwf¢.5 lq�w�y `( C ey: WJ No Project/ Built/ Balanced Use Approved 2005 PP Alt. A PC Rec. Alt. B Plan Alt. C General Plan office (sf) 8,929,775 540,231 1,040,231 1,040,231 2,540,231 2,540,231 4,040,231 Net Increase 0 500,0003 500,0002 2,000,0001 2,000,0001 3,500,0001 Commercial (sf) 3,729,569 701,4131 701,413 701,41331 701,4133 701,4133 701,413 3 Net increase 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hotel (rooms) 1,090 339 600 1,339 839 1,339 1,339 Net Increase 0 261 1,000 500 1,000 1,000 Residential (du) 21,339 1,895 1,895 REMOVE 3,316 4,421 4,421 Net Increase 0 0 NIA 1,421 2,526 2,526 Notes: 1. Office — includes Major Company allocation of 523,118 sf. 2. Office sf. in Planning Commission recommendation does not retain a Major Company allocation pool. 3. Commercial- assumes that the existing Valles Mall square footage (1,207,774 so will be demolished and 600,000 sf min. will be built at site, with the remaining (607,774 so moved to the City-wide pool. The EIR conservatively analyzed 1,343,679 sf of commercial square footage due to the demolition and reconstruction of the Vallco Mall square footage. 4. Residential -includes the 1,400 units recommended for the 2014-2022 Housing Element. Key Question no. 1: Development Allocation • What should development allocation be for office, commercial, hotel and residential units through 2040? 12/2/2014 21 Community Benefits • The proposed level of benefit is equivalent to at least 15% of the project profits attributed to the increase in height (based on pro -forma review) • Projects must provide a ground floor retail component; and one or more of the following benefits: • Transportation and Mobility Improvements (bike, pedestrian facilities, participation in a community shuttle program, etc.) • Public Facilities (land or space). • Senior Housing- 15% of housing that is not already targeted towards seniors. • Public Art and Cultural Facilities (new or expansion to museum, teen center) • Parks and Open Space (land/improvements within project or off-site) • In lieu of the benefits, a "Cash -in -Lieu Contribution" may be allowed Key Question 2: Community Benefits • Should Cupertino have a Community Benefits Program? • If yes, does the City Council have any revisions to: — Value of the community benefits? — Specific program items — retail requirement or other items? • Recommended in some parts of the City based on the following: — Community Design Survey indicated support for increased heights: • Near freeways and away from residential development (Cupertino Inn, N. De Anza Special Area, Vallco Shopping District East, Oaks Gateway) • Hotels (Cupertino Inn, Kimco property) • Where existing taller buildings exist (N. De Anza Special Area, City Center) — Allow increased office development • N. De Anza Special Area, North Crossroads Node (Stevens Creek Office Center), Vallco Shopping District East (East side of Wolfe Rd.) — Allow increased density • Oaks Gateway, Hamptons 12/2/2014 22 Planning Areal Existing GP I Alt A I PC Rec. I Balanced Plan Alt B Alt C Heart of the City Special Area Oaks — 45ft. No change No change Same as Alternative B — 45 ft.; or 60 ft. with — 60 ft.; or 75 ft. with Gateway — 25 du/ac Road ft. with retail retail with retail; or 110 — 30 ft. for retail — 25 du/ac — 25 du/ac ft. with Glenbrook — 35 du/ac — 35 du/ac if HE site — 35 du/ac if HE site Glenbrooks — 30 ft. No change — 45 ft. No change No change No change site — 20 du/ac — See HE topic — 35 du/ac West of Wolfe for density No change No change — 45 ft.; or 60 ft. with North — 45 ft. No change Same as — Same as — 45 ft.; or 60 ft. with — 60 ft.; or 75 ft. with Crossroads — 25 du/ac Balanced Plan Alternative B retail retail Node community benefits — 35 du/ac — 25 du/ac — 35 du/ac — 40 du/ac community along Stevens Creek — 35 du ac if HE site along the Wolfe Rd City Center — 45 ft. No change No change Same as Alternative B — 60 ft.; or 75 ft. with — 75 ft.; or 90 ft. with Stevens Creek — 25 du/ac retail; or 90 ft. with retail; or 110 ft. with and Wolfe community benefits community benefits — 35 du/ac on specific sites on specific sites — 25 du/ac — 25 du/ac South Vallco — 45 ft.; or 60 No change No change No change — 60 ft.; or 75 ft. with — 75 ft. or 90 ft. with Park ft. with retail — 60 ft.; or 75 ft. with Gateway — 35 du/ac retail; or 110 ft. with retail; or 160 ft. with retail; or 90 ft. for — 35 du/ac retail; or 145 ft. with (Cupertino Inn) community benefits community benefits hotel and major ft. with community benefits — 35 du/ac — 35 du/ac N. De Anza — 45 ft.No change Same as Same as Alternative B — 60 ft. — 75 ft. Blvd Special — 25 du/ac Alternative 8 — 25 du/ac 25 du/ac. Area — 35 du/ac — 35 du/ac Planning Area I Existing GP Alt PC Rec. Balanced Pian Alt B Alt C Valicu Shopping District Special Area East of Wolfe — 45 ft.; or 60 No change — 60 ft.; or 75 ft. — 60 ft.; or 75 ft. with — 60 ft.; or 75 ft. — 75 ft.; or 90 ft. with Road ft. with with retail retail; or 90 ft. with with retail; or 110 retail; or 160 ft. with retail — 35 du/ac community benefits ft. with community benefits — 35 du/ac — 35 du/ac community — 35 du/ac benefits — 35 du/ac West of Wolfe — 45 ft.; or 60 No change No change — 45 ft.; or 60 ft. with — 45 ft.; or 60 ft. — 60 ft.; or 75 ft. with Road ft. with retail; or 75 ft. with with retail; or 75 retail; or 85 ft. with retail community benefits ft. with community benefits — 35 du/ac for a 200 ft. depth community along Stevens Creek along the Wolfe Rd benefits along and Wolfe prop. line and set Stevens Creek — 35 du/ac back 200 ft. from and Wolfe Stevens Creek Blvd — 35 du/ac prop. line — 35 du/ac Homestead Special Area North De Anza — 45 ft. No change — 45 ft.; or 60 ft. — 45 ft.; or 60 ft. with — 60 ft.; or 75 ft. — 60 ft.; or 75 ft. with Gateway — 35 du/ac with retail; or 90 retail; or 90 ft. for with retail; or 95 retail; or 145 ft. with (Cupertino Inn) ft. fora hotel hotel and major ft. with community benefits and 500 -person convention center community — 35 du/ac convention with community benefits center benefits — 35 du/ac — 35 du/ac — 35 du/ac Stelling — 45 ft. No change No change Same as Alternative B — 45 ft.; or 60 ft. — 45 ft.; or 60 ft. with Gateway (east — 35 du/ac with retail retail of Stell in — 35 du/ac — 35 du/ac 12/2/2014 23 Planning Area Existing GP Alt PC Rec. Balanced Plan Alt Alt North Vallco Park Special Area N. Vallco - 60 ft. No change No change - 60 ft.; or 90 ft. for a - 60 ft.; or 75 ft. - 60 ft.; or 75 ft. Gateway (west o - 25 du/ac 200 ft. depth along Wolfe Rd with retail; or 95 with retail; or Wolfe Rd.) prop line for hotel & major ft. with 145 ft. with convention center with community community community benefits benefits benefits - 25 du ac - 25 du ac - 25 du ac N. Vallco - 60 ft. No change Same as - 7S ft.; 60 ft. for - 60 ft.; or 75 ft. - 60 ft.; or 75 ft. Gateway (east o - 25 du/ac Balanced Plan buildings within 50 ft. of with retail; or 95 with retail; or Wolfe Rd. - 99 du/ac if prop. lines abutting Wolfe ft. with 145 ft. with Hamptons site) HE site Rd, Pruneridge Ave & Apple community community Campus2. benefits benefits - 25 du/ac - 65 du/ac - 110 du/ac - 65 du ac if HE site South De Anza Two parts: S. De Anza Merge into Same as Same as Alternative A Same as Alternative Same as Alternative Boulevard Blvd one area for Balanced Plan A Special Area - 30 ft. South De (see HE for - 25 du/ac Anza density) S. Sunnyvale- Boulevard Saratoga - 30 ft. - 30 ft. - 25 du/ac - 15 du ac. Summerwinds HE - 30 ft. - 30 ft. - 45 ft. No change Same as Alternative Same as Alternative Site - 5-15 du/ac - 25 du/ac (see HE for A A density) Building plan 1:1 along all arterials No change Same as Same as Alternative B 1:1 along all Same as Alternative along arterial 1:1.5 (S. Valles along Balanced Plan arterials B SCB & N. Vallco along (No change to Homestead Rd.) Heart of the City setback of 35 ft. Key Question 3: Building Heights • Any changes to the heights recommended in the Special Areas? Requests: • Cupertino Inn — 108 ft. for a 9 -story building • Stevens Creek Office Center— 75 ft. for portions of site • Vallco — heights studied in Alternative C 12/2/2014 24 Vallco Shopping District • Community workshops indicated: — Office development — Residential development — Retail development — Mixed use town -center format (like "Santana Row," "Stanford Shopping Center") — Open spaces — Mid — High rise development — Buffer for single family neighborhood • Godbe Survey indicated: — Support for revitalization of Vallco (86%) — Support for a mix of housing & office uses in addition to retail and entertainment uses (78.1%) • General Plan and Zoning Amendment — Include office and residential uses with substantial retail/entertainment component — Must include: a. Complete redevelopment of site b. Adoption of Specific Plan with phasing and infrastructure imp. r Tnwn Cantor fnrmat Ke uestion a co Shopping Distrist: ® Agree with Specific Plan and "Town -Center" concept with mix of retail/entertainment, residential and office uses? 12/2/2014 25 Commercial (Retail) (s.f.) Office (s.f.) Hotel (rooms) Residential (du) Allocation 600,000 (min.) 1,000,000 (max.) 375 (max.) 600 (max.) Ke uestion a co Shopping Distrist: ® Agree with Specific Plan and "Town -Center" concept with mix of retail/entertainment, residential and office uses? 12/2/2014 25 12/2/2014 enaavon • Specific Plan process should be required before final development allocations and uses are approved on site • Like "Town Center" concept • Recommended changes to policies regarding Vallco: — Remove minimum and maximum allocations; and — Include a mix of major retail with entertainment, residential, office and a five-star hotel with a major convention cener ■ Sandhill has communicated that they have acquired all properties in Vallco Shopping District except the indoor mall portion and need the following to redevelop site: — 2,000,000 s.f. of office space — Heights (Alternative C) — 600 units • West — 60 feet, 75 feet with retail & up to 85 — 600,000 s.f. of retail feet with retail & community benefits • East — 75 feet, 90 feet with retail & up to 160 feet with retail & community benefits • Retail Strategist states that: — Residential and office are highest and best uses for site — BAE Market Study found a net new city-wide demand of 2.4-3.0 m s.f. of office — Up to 2,000,000 s.f. for Vallco could be reasonable & necessary to make project viable — Ultimate allocation is dependent on an analysis of a development pro -forma Key Question 4a: Vallco Shopping District Allocation • What should Vallco Shopping District Office Allocation and Heights be? • PG&E site: change from Quasi- public/Institutional to Commercial/Quasi- public/Institutional ommercial/Quasi- public/InstitutionaI • Mirapath: change from Industrial to Commercial/Industrial • Other: Other revisions to ensure that General Plan land use designations and zoning are consistent. • Only Element of the General Plan that needs review and certification by CA HCD • 2014-2022 Housing Element must be adopted by Jan. 31, 2015 (plus a 120 -day grace period {May 31, 2015}) • If adopted, next Housing Element update in 2023 • If not adopted, must be updated in four years (2019) • Content dictated by State Law and includes: — Needs Assessment — Constraints to new housing production — Description of goals, policies and strategies to achieve objectives — Housing production objectives consistent with RHNA & site inventory — Evaluation of accomplishments — Consistency with other elements 12/2/2014 27 12/2/2014 Remainder of Santa Clara County: 57,772 units 31.3% of Region City of Cupertino: 1,064 units, 0.57% of ABAG 1.8% of County ABAG Region: 187,990 units Income Group % of County Cupertino % of Units ppRep-al. e� Bay'��,"�°a""d"o�Yk�: AMI RHNA • City gets credit for total of 62 units (30 approved and 32 second units anticipated for the 2014-2022 RHNA Very Low 0-50% 356 33.5% Low 51-80% 207 19.5% period). Therefore, current RHNA is 1002 units Consultant in consultation with HCD Moderate 81-120% 231 21.7% Above Moderate 120% + 270 25.4% recommends a 25 — 40% surplus (1,250-1,400 units) Total I 1,064" 100% • Policies and programs reformatted to reduce redundancy and reorganized for ease in reading and implementing; • Programs revised to ensure compliance with State law — ELI households (AB 2634) & persons with developmental disabilities (SB 812) — Amendments to the zoning ordinance related to density bonuses, emergency shelters, and farmworker and employee housing and — Amend the Heart of the City Specific Plan to revise method in which residential density is calculated in mixed-use developments. • A new goal to highlight energy conservation; • An existing general plan policy related to mixed-use development to encourage development near transportation facilities and employment centers has been added; • Redevelopment Funding: Language updated to acknowledge Redevelopment Agency (RDA) housing set-aside funds no longer available • Housing Mitigation Program: The City's affordable housing program —the Housing Mitigation Program — has been amended to comply with recent litigation • Housing Preservation Program: Updates to be internally consistent and consistent with State Law 12/2/2014 29 Housing dement Potential Sites • Potential sites list developed through public workshops and study sessions with Commissions and Council • Potential sites studied at varying densities in each alternative > • Minimal change > •Moderate ' Developer y y - proposed E • S. De Anza — E change c °' 25DUA °1 • VTA PDA— 'Maximum a a 35DUA a densities proposed =3 Ho( srna Eleme� • HCD Criteria — Existing Use on Site — Realistic Potential for Recycling — Site Size and Ownership Patterns — Development Density (to meet affordability criteria of 20 du/ac at 85% of maximum density) • Other Criteria — Within % mile of a VTA PDA — Locate close to employment and activity centers — Corner Lot(s) with large frontage preferred — Housing as an incentive for redevelopment • Godbe survey indicates support for development of housing along major routes (36.2%) 12/2/2014 30 12/2/2014 31 Priority Density and Realistic Capacity' (85% of max. density) Priority Site Name (meets Balanced Plan No. Priority Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C (meets i No. criteria) (Recommended) Recommended Housing Element Sites Alternative B Alternative C 25 du/ac 35 du/ac 35 du/ac 35 du/ac 1. The Oaks High 0 du 235 du 235 du 235 du 35 du/ac 40 du/ac 7. 35 du/ac 35 du/ac 35 du/ac 35 du/ac 2. Vallco Shopping District High 0 du 600 du 600 du 800 du 35 du/ac Hamptons 8. 25 du/ac 65 du/ac * 65 du/ac 110 du/ac 3 (342 units existing) High g 0 du additional 344 du additional 344 du additional 820 du additional 187 du 214 du 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 4. United Furniture+other High 103 du 103 du 103 du 103 du X25 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 25 du/ac S. Barry Swenson High 11 du 11 du 11 du 1 11 du 25 du/ac Glenbrooks(517 units 10. 20 du/ac** 20 du/ac** .20 du/ac** 20 du/ac** 6. existing) High 93 du additional 93 du additional 93 du additional 93 du additional Total Units on Recommended Sites 207 du 1,386 du 1,386 du 1 2,062 du Realistic capacity is the minimum number of units that may be developed on a site. Where portions of a site are developed with housing, the minimum density shall be 20 du/ac. 12/2/2014 31 Priority Density and Realistic Capacity (85% of max. density) Balanced Plan Priority Site Name (meets i No. Alternative A � Alternative B Alternative C criteria) (Recommended) Alternate Housing Element Sites 25 du/ac 35 du/ac 35 du/ac 40 du/ac 7. Marina Plaza Mod. 145 du 204 du 204 du 232 du 25 du/ac 35 du/ac 35 du/ac 40 du/ac 8. Stevens Creek Office Mod. 134 187 du 187 du 214 du 25 du/ac du/ac du/ac 25 du/ac -9% _ {yPFegs-C°I-FinA Aye _M&d _ _ X25 X25 105 du 105 du 105 du 105 du Low- 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 10. Loree Center Mod. 27 du 27 du 27 du 27 du Low- 35 du/ac 35 du/ac 35 du/ac 35 du/ac 11. Homestead Lanes+ Adj. Mod. 0 151 du 151 du 151 du Summerwinds & Granite Low- 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 40 du/ac 12. Rock Mod. 96 du 96 du 96 du 154 du Low- 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 13. Shan, Q Mart Mod. 33 du 33 du 33 du 33 du Total Units on Alternate Sites 435 du 698 du 698 du 811 du ' Realistic capacity is the minimum number of units that may be developed on a site. Where portions of a site are developed with housing, the minimum density shall be 20 du/ac. 12/2/2014 31 Priority Site Name No. Existin Zoning Priority Density & Capacity at 85% & 100% &Proposed Zoning 1 The Oaks High g 150 du maximum recommended — results in P(CG) approximately 19 units/ac Priority Densi4 and Realistic Capacity (85% of max. density) Priority High 889 du add. @ 100% Balanced Plan 99 du/ac- P(Res) Site Name (meets No. 3 United Furniture + other Alternative A 25 du/ac Alternative B Alternative C 103 du @ 85% criteria) (Recommended) 121 du @ 100% Sites Recommended for Removal Same as Balanced Plan 4. Barry Swenson Villages 25 du/ac 20 du/ac** 20 du/ac** 20 du/ac** 20 du/ac** 14 (468 units existing) Low 62 du 62 du 62 du 62 du _ _ — Arm/_ _ (517 units existing) uLc 306 du @ 85% 25 d�(ar S5. Scandinavian L71W _5 58 du _25 _Lac 58 du �2�duf�ic_ 58 du _ _ 58 du Foothill/ 25 du/ac 15 du/ac* 25 du/ac 15 du/ac* 25 du/ac 16. McClellan Low 0 27 0 du 27 Increase building heights from 30 feet to 45 feet 15 du/ac* 25 du/ac 15 du/ac* 35 du 17. Bateh Bros. Low 0 du 14 du 0 du 19 du/ac 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 18. Carl Berg Low 169 du 169 du 169 du 169 du Total Units on Removed Sites 231 du 272 du 231 du 277 du (Remove) ' Realistic capacity is the minimum number of units that may be developed on a site. Where portions of a site are developed with housing, the minimum density shall be 20 du/ac. KeV Question 5: Housing Element Sites • Does City Council agree with Housing Element sites list and densities? • Does City Council agree on the Alternative Sites List and priority? Priority Site Name No. Existin Zoning Priority Density & Capacity at 85% & 100% &Proposed Zoning 1 The Oaks High g 150 du maximum recommended — results in P(CG) approximately 19 units/ac Hamptons 748 du add. @ 85% 2. (342 units existing) High 889 du add. @ 100% P(Res)-70 99 du/ac- P(Res) Same as Balanced Plan 3 United Furniture + other High 25 du/ac P(CG, Res) 103 du @ 85% 121 du @ 100% Same as Balanced Plan 4. Barry Swenson High 25 du/ac P(CG, Res) 11 du @ 85% 13 du @ 100% Glenbrooks 28 du/ac (300 additional recommended) 5. (517 units existing) High 306 du @ 85% R3(10-20) 360 du @ 100% Increase building heights from 30 feet to 45 feet 25 du/ac Summerwinds/Granite Rock/Jack in 96 du @ 85% 6. the Box Low -Mod 114 du @ 100% P(CG, Res 5-15) Increase building heights from 30 feet to 45 feet 12/2/2014 32 rtes Priority Site Name Priority Density & Capacity at 85%&100%& Proposed Zoning No. Existing Zoning Same as Balanced Plan Villages 20 du/ac 7. (468 units existing) Mod 62 du add. @ 85% R3 72 du add. @ 100% Same as Balanced Plan Marina Plaza 35 du/ac 8' P(CG, Res) Mod 204 du @ 85% 240 du @ 100% Same as Balanced Plan Carl Berg 25 du/ac 9' P(CG, Res) Low -Mod. 169 du @ 85% 199 du @ 100% Alternate Sites Total @ 85% 435 du Notes: a. Projects up to 100% of the maximum density may be proposed. Any units above 85%of the maximum density would have to obtain a Conditional Use Permit Realistic capacity is the minimum number of units that may be developed on a site. Where portions of a site are developed with housing, the minimum density shall be 20 du/ac. • Amendments to General Plan: — Updated residential density from "gross acres" to "acres" • Zoning Map — Changes to reflect General Plan conformance • Municipal Code — Reorganized parkland dedication into own chapter — Amendments to reflect changes required per Housing Element — Clean up • Heart of the City Specific Plan — Updated Land Use & Zoning Maps — Housing Element and General Plan conformance • Changes to method in which residential density is calculated for mixed-use developments • Changes to the building plane line in the South Vallco area along Stevens Creek Boulevard 12/2/2014 33 • Four meetings with School Districts • School District's demographer and projections analyst prepared the school impact report for EIR • School Districts reviewed the report and provided input • Projections indicate following for new units (not existing): 12/2/2014 34 4,421 units 1,400 units CUSD — Elementary 901 286 CUSD — Middle 253 81 FUHSD 253 81 CUSD/FUHSDTotal 1,407 448 SCUSD — Elementary 28 9 SCUSD — Middle 14 5 SCUSD — High 14 5 SCUSD Total 56 19 12/2/2014 34 The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) is State's primary environmental protection law. CEQA requires that public agencies disclose environmental impacts that have physical effect on environment as follows: — Effects found not to be significant — Significant impacts — Ways to mitigate or avoid impacts — Effects that cannot be mitigated — Alternatives CEQA does not dictate project approval or denial. Draft and Final Program EIR are available online at: www.cupertinogpa.org ■ General Plan is a large-scale and long-range planning document ■ Buildout of potential future development is based on horizon year of 2040 EIR analyzes growth occurring between 2014 and 2040 - 26 -year buildout horizon ■ 2040 is consistent with Plan Bay Area, Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)/ Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) 12/2/2014 35 ■ Addresses large-scale, long-term projects encompassing a broad scope of physical development issues, such as General Plans, Specific or Master Plans and Zoning Ordinances ■ Analyzes full buildout scenario that accounts for all development allowed under General Plan (27 years) ■ Allows subsequent project -level environmental review for future development to tier off Program EIR — Individual projects permitted under General Plan that warrant further analysis under CEOA are reviewed, including identification of impacts and mitigation measures, at time of project proposal ■ To the extent feasible, where environmental impacts are identified, CEOA requires impact be: — avoided, — minimized, — rectified, — reduced or eliminated, or — compensated ■ CEQA permits incorporation of mitigation measures, designed to protect, preserve and enhance environmental resources as: — Goals, — Policies and — Strategies 12/2/2014 36 Impact Conclusion Environmental Topics No Impacts ■ Agricultural and Forestry Mitigation ■ Mineral Resources Less Than Significant ■ Aesthetics ■ Cultural Resources Significant and Unavoidable ® Geology, Soils and Seismicity ■ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ■ Hydrology and Water Quality ■ Land Use and Planning ■ Population and Housing ■ Public Services and Recreation Impact Conclusion Environmental Topics Less Than Significant With ■ Biological Resources Mitigation ■ Hazards and Hazardous Materials s Utilities and Service System Significant and Unavoidable ■ Air Quality ■ Noise ■ Transportation and Circulation 12/2/2014 37 Category Land Use Alternative C CEQA Project No Project Land Use Alternative A Land Use Alternative B Office 4,040,231 sf 540,231 sf 1,040,231 sf 2,540,231 sf Commercial 1,343,679 sf 701,413 sf 701,413 sf 1,343,679 sf Hotel 1,339 rooms 339 rooms 600 rooms 839 rooms Residential 4,421 units 1,895 units 1,895 units 3,316 units Population 12,998 5,571 5,571 9,749 =Jobs 16,855 3,461 5,206 11,705 Per CEQA, Land Use Alternative A is the Environmentally Superior Alternative. Significant Impact: ■ Possible loss or abandonment of nests of birds protected under the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and California Department of Fish and Game Code Mitigation Measure: ■ Nests of raptors and other birds shall be protected when in active use 12/2/2014 Significant Impact: ■ Known hazardous materials sites within Cupertino Mitigation Measures: ■ Prepare project -specific Environmental Site Management Plans ■ Require vapor intrusion assessments Significant Impact: ■ Exceeds current contractually available treatment capacity at SJ/SC Water Pollution Control Plant Mitigation Measures: ■ Work with Cupertino Sanitary District to increase available citywide treatment and transmission capacity ■ Work to establish development monitoring and tracking system to ensure capacity is not exceeded ■ Work with Cupertino Sanitary District to prepare study to determine more current estimate of wastewater generation rates that reflect actual development 12/2/2014 39 Significant Impact: ■ 2023 termination of City's agreement with Newby Island Landfill facility, and facility's estimated 2025 closure date would result in insufficient disposal capacity at buildout Mitigation Measures: ■ Continue recycling ordinances and zero -waste policies to further increase diversion rate and lower per capita disposal rate ■ Monitor generation volumes in relation to capacities at receiving landfill sites to ensure adequate capacity ■ Seek new landfill sites to replace Altamont and Newby Island landfills when these landfills are closed Significant Impact: ■ Substantial permanent increases to ambient noise levels throughout; primarily from increases to transportation - related noise, especially that of automobile traffic Mitigation Measures: ■ Most effective noise -attenuation measures (e.g. sound walls and berms) inappropriate along most streets with commercial or residential street frontage due to impacts to pedestrian/bicycle connectivity and aesthetic considerations ■ These types of mitigation are considered infeasible or inappropriate in majority of locations where sensitive land uses already exist 12/2/2014 .o Significant Impacts: ■ Rate of growth in vehicles miles traveled (VMT) would exceed rate of population and employment growth, resulting in substantial increase in regional criteria air pollutant emissions ■ Air pollutant emissions associated with Project would result in cumulatively considerable contribution to air quality impacts Mitigation Measures: ■ Require compliance with BAAQMD control measures and construction mitigation ■ Require health risk assessments Significant Impacts and Mitigation Measures Study intersection fgg, = Cen Be (btitigalad ;? -CMP atentiany Ba h?Nlgate67n!ovn: _ Cncrrdinaraa VFdb Other JurisdiGions = Cam al Be mugaied =."enunitysite —.—= Frer+ray Impacts 12/2/2014 41 Land Use Land Use Alternative A Alternative B LTS CEQA Project No Topic (Alternative Q Project Aesthetics LTS LTS Air Quality Su Su Biological Resources LTS/M LTS/M Cultural Resources LTS LTS Geology, Soils & Mineral Resources LTS LTS Greenhouse Gas Emissions LTS LTS Hazards And Hazardous Materials LTS/M LTS/M Hydrology And Water Quality LTS LTS Land Use And Planning LTS LTS Noise Su Su Population And Housing LTS LTS Public Services And Recreation LTS LTS Transportation And Traffic Su Su Utilities And Infrastructure LTS/M LTS/M Note: SU = Signfiant and Unavoidable; LTS = Less Than Significant; LTS/M = Len Than SignMant with mitigation 1. One Air Quality Imp- LTS Land Use Land Use Alternative A Alternative B LTS LTS Su Su' LTS/M LTS/M LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS LTS/M LTS/M LTS LTS LTS LTS su Su LTS LTS LTS LTS su Su LTS/M LTS/M ■ 45 -day public review period of Draft EIR (June 18 — August 1, 2014) — Six comment letters from public agencies — 19 comment letters from members of the general public — Most comments did not pertain to adequacy of Draft EIR ■ Error correction, language edits, and clarifications were made, but no substantial revisions. ■ Late comments addressed in late comments memo — raised no new unaddressed issues ■ Late comments since date of late comments memo have been sent to the Council and do not raise any new unaddressed issues 12/2/2014 11% • Traffic, particularly around schools • School impacts particularly that development impact fees not adequate to cover cost of additional school facilities generated by development • Why a Housing Element must be adopted • Lot of ongoing development in eastern part of town • Distribution of Priority Housing Sites inequitable and development should be placed on the west side of City • Existing retail centers such as Vallco, Oaks and Marina Plaza should not be converted into housing • Parkland and water supply concerns • Questions related to the Student Generation Rates • Separate the Housing Element from General Plan Amendments • Retain Vallco as a retail center/mall with expanded entertainment options and a public park • Delay redevelopment of Vallco until surrounding developments completed • Concerns about multi -family housing not paying adequate parcel taxes • Support from Chamber, business and developer community for maximum amount of development studied in EIR 12/2/2014 43 12/2/2014 1. Development Allocation: What should the City plan for in terms of Development Allocation for office, commercial, hotel and residential units through 2040? 2. Community Benefits Should Cupertino have a Community Benefits Program? If yes, does the City Council have any revisions to: — Value of the community benefits? — Specific program items— retail requirement or other items? 3. Building Heights Does the City Council have any recommended changes to the Balanced Plan heights recommended in the Special Areas? 4. Valko Shopping District Does the City Council agree on the Specific Plan and "town -center" concept with a mix of retail/entertainment, residential and office in the Vallco Shopping District? 5. Housing Element Sites Does the City Council agree on the Housing Element sites list and densities? Does the City Council agree on the Alternative Sites List and priority? • Adopt Resolution 14-210 recommending Certification of an Environmental Impact Report, adoption of Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adoption of Mitigation Measures and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, (EA -2013-03) • Adopt Resolution 14-211 (GPA -2013-01) in substantially similar form to the attached Resolution, as amended: — Draft General Plan (Community Vision 2040); and — General Plan Map Amendments • Adopt Resolution 14-212 to authorize staff to, in substantially similar form to the attached Resolution, as amended : — Forward the Draft 2014-2022 Housing Element to the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD); and — Use the prioritized list of Alternative Housing Element sites (in case one or more of the adopted sites are not accepted by HCD as Housing Element sites) • Conduct first reading of Ordinance 14-2124, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino Rezoning Certain Sites in the City for Conformance with the General Plan and Housing Element Zoning Map Amendment," Z-2013-03; • Conduct first reading of Ordinance 14-2125, "An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Cupertino amending various Chapters in Title 18 and Title 19, including the amendment of the Density Bonus Ordinance, the addition of a Chapter in Title 19 to implement policies in the General Plan, the addition of a Chapter in Title 13 to improve readability," Municipal Code Amendment, MCA - 2014 -01; • Adopt Resolution 14-213, Specific Plan Amendment, SPA -2014-01, in substantially similar form to the attached Resolution, as amended. 12/2/2014 GR C 4a Elizabeth Marchu C Technology Credit Union Brent McNally r—..– The Cypress Hotel Keith Warner Kevin McClelland Pacific Business Centers Vice President of Advocacy & Past President Matt Wheeler, LMGW Public Accountants Cc: Council Members City Manager C y Cupertino Chamber of Commerce Your Partner In Silicon Valley November 07, 2014 20455 Silverado Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Tel (408) 252-7054 Mayor Gilbert Wong and Cupertino City Council Fax (408) 252-0638 www.cupertino-chamber.org 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Anjali Kausar Executive Director Re: Cupertino Chamber of Commerce support for the General Plan 2014 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Amendment. BOARD OFFICERS Dear Mayor Gilbert Wong and Cupertino City Councilmembers, Darcy Paul, President Paul Law Group, A Professional Corp. Kevin McClelland, Past President I am writing to urge you to reject the Planning Commission's Leeward Financial & Insurance Services Recommendations and to support the recommendations stated below for the Inc. General Plan Amendment and urge you to finish the hard work that has been Richard Abdalah, President Elect done since March 2013 when this process began. Abdalah Law Offices Art Cohen, VP Membership BlueLight Cinemas s From the Cupertino Staff Report: On August 21, 2012, the City Council directed staff to begin a General Plan Sandy James, VP HR & Staffing Lehigh Hanson amendment in order to: Scott Jeng, VP Finance • Replenish office and hotel allocations (after the office allocation was reduced HSBC Bank USA, N.A. to under 18,000 square feet since the Main Street project received most of the Mahesh Nihalani, VP Diwali remaining office allocation in the city-wide allocation pool); Jewels in Style Inform the Vallco Shopping District Specific Plan; Mike Rohde, VP Special Events Vallco Shopping Mall • Consolidate individual requests from property owners; and Tim Widman, VP LAC Law Office of Timothy. Widman Update to address State law, and address clean-up. Keiichiro Yoshida, VP AABC BOARD MEMBERS We ask that you consider 1400 units for residential units, 3 million square feet for the Office Allocation and maintain the additional 500,000+ square feet set aside Claudio Bono Cupertino Inn for "major employers". We also ask you to support the heights analyzed in "Alternative C". Janice Chua Bitter + Sweet We urge you to support these numbers and pass the General Plan Jessica Epstein, Silicon Valley Association of Realtors Amendment so we can move forward. Mike Foulkes Apple Inc. Brandi Garcia PG&E Mike King Best regards, Recology South Bay Elizabeth Marchu C Technology Credit Union Brent McNally r—..– The Cypress Hotel Keith Warner Kevin McClelland Pacific Business Centers Vice President of Advocacy & Past President Matt Wheeler, LMGW Public Accountants Cc: Council Members City Manager LL i�1'- d- Iy J -tem # �- Colleen Lettire From: Karen B. Guerin Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 3:17 PM To: City Clerk Subject: FW: No rezoning vallco From: Ziyue Yu [ziyuey@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 2:47 PM To: City Council Subject: No rezoning vallco Cupertino City Council Member, I just have two simple questions for you: 1. Does any of you currently have a child enrolled in the cupertino elementary schools near Vallco? 2. Does any of your house is within one mile of Vallco radiation? I know my answers, I have two kids enrolling in Collins, and my house is .8 miles away from Vallco. If you were in my situation, I believe you will be among us to protest. Please do remember we vote for you to represent our best interests, not the developers. I urge the Cupertino City Council to take the following steps: - Stop consideration of General Plan amendments until the City listens and responds to more community members. - Show residents why the General Plan must be amended. Show us one project at a time. Listen to community input for each development project. Do not re -zone a parcel until the following actions are complete: 1. The developer presents a plan for development 2. The community approves the plan for development Thankyou Ziyue Yu 1 C_L. IQ - a-14 1_- tM 4 . Colleen Lettire From: Karen B. Guerin Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 3:50 PM To: City Clerk Subject: FW: Cupertino Voter opposes General Plan Amendments From: DANIEL CHEUNG [danielcheung@msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 3:36 PM To: Gilbert Wong; Rod Sinks; Barry Chang; Orrin Mahoney; Mark Santoro Cc: DANIEL CHEUNG; City Council Subject: Cupertino Voter opposes General Plan Amendments RE: Cupertino Voter opposes General Plan Amendments Cupertino City Council Member, Community members are concerned that the Cupertino General Plan amendments will reduce the quality of life in Cupertino. Possible effects of the amendments include the following concerns: - More and taller buildings - Vanishing opportunities to create parks and schools - Over -crowded schools and over -crowded neighborhoods - Increased traffic at schools and on major streets throughout the city - Growth that impacts some neighborhoods much more than others The Cupertino General Plan amendments that are proposed by the City were created without sufficient input from the community. Opportunities for community input were not communicated effectively, and participation in the input sessions was very low. I urge the Cupertino City Council to take the following steps: - Stop consideration of General Plan amendments until the City listens and responds to more community members. - Show residents why the General Plan must be amended. Show us one project at a time. Listen to community input for each development project. Do not re -zone a parcel until the following actions are complete: 1. The developer presents a plan for development 2. The community approves the plan for development - No rezoning of Vallco Name: Daniel Cheung and Family Email: danielcheung_@msn.com Address: 18956 Tilson Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014 CC 12-2-14 #2 Kirsten Squarcia Subject: New General Plan -Housing Element - 20605 20705 Valley Green From: Myron Crawford <Mcrawford(aiber vg c.com> Date: December 1, 2014 at 9:16:37 PM PST To: "Piug(a—)cupertino.or" <piug(a-)cupertino.ore> Subject: New General Plan -Housing Element - 20605 20705 Valley Green BERG & BERG DEVELOPERS, INC. 10050 Bandley Drive Cupertino, CA 95014-2188 Ph (408) 725-0700 Fax (408) 725-1626 mcrawford(2 berEvc.com 12/1/14 Piu Ghosh Senior City Planner City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 Tel: 408-777-3308 Dir 408-777-3277; Fax: 408-777-3333 Email: piug(&,,cupertino.org Reference: New General Plan -Housing Element Subject: 20605 20705 Valley Green APN 326-10-046 Piu, Please note that Berg and Berg aka Berg Family Partners, LP is desirous of having the above property remain on the site inventory for future potential housing. It is possible that Apple could vacate a number of facilities south of I280 creating a possible redevelopment of the property. Please include this in your council presentation. Thank you, Myron Crawford 1 CC. it W - a. -N Rcm #j_ 4_"; r ° A� P R O P E R T I E S December 1, 2014 Mayor Gilbert Wong Honorable Members of the Cupertino City Council 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino CA 95014-3255 This letter is sent in advance of the December 2, 2014 Council Meeting at which you will make decisions on the General Plan Amendment, the 2014-2022 Housing Element, and other related issues, KT Properties, Inc. is in escrow for the purchase of The Oaks Shopping Center, located at 21.267 Stevens Creek Blvd., City of Cupertino. We expect to close on the property in early January. We appreciate the fact the Council is most concerned with focusing on the mandates of the Housing Element at this time. With this in mind, KT. Properties, Inc. asks that you strongly consider following the Staff recommendation that The Oaks Shopping Center should be the Priority # 1 Housing Site with Capacity of 235-276 Dwelling Units (Balanced Plan and Alternatives B and C). Our firm is prepared to construct a minimum of 235 units of housing on The Oaks site. The location of The Oaks on Cupertino's West side and next to Highway 85 reduces its impact on the city's older neighborhoods. Its proximity to the Mary Avenue Bicycle Bridge means that residents could use alternative transportation. Finally, we believe that the distribution of housing sites throughout the community will alleviate the concerns of those who see too much construction in the Wolfe Road area. We are looking forward to working with the City of Cupertino to repurpose The Oaks Shopping Center. With this in mind we are interfacing with future users for the balance of the property, and look forward to discussions with City Staff as our planning process continues. At this time, however, our focus is on the important role of housing, and we ask that the Council approve the Staff recommendation for our site. With my best regards' egar , Mark Tersini, Principal KF PROPERTIES 21710 Steens Clel;k Boulevard, Suite 28[1, Cuperlino, California 95014 1811/257-2100 - Fax: 400/255-11620 Karen B. Guerin From: James Cheng <jamesxcheng@yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 3:44 PM To: Gilbert Wong; Rod Sinks; Orrin Mahoney; Mark Santoro; Barry Chang; dapaul@cupertino.org; savita4council@gmail.com Subject: Please don't grow Cupertino too much and too fast Dear Major/Council Member/Council Member Elect, First, thanks for devoting your time to serving the community! My wife and I are Cupertino residents for almost 15 years. We were attracted to Cupertino by the excellent schools. Currently we have two children in the CUSD schools, and we have already seen schools getting more crowded over the years. We are very concerned about the proposed changes on re -zoning large areas of the city to allow higher -density housing, large hotels and millions of square feet of office space. Once the Apple Campus 2 is done, many office buildings currently occupied by Apple will become empty, so it doesn't make sense to build more offices at Cupertino now. High-density housing shouldn't be over -built either, as it will make the schools so crowded that quality will become lower and Cupertino will lose its attractiveness. Let's grow the city at a moderate pace. Over -growth will hurt the city and its residents. Thanks for listening. Sincerely, Xuejian Cheng Karen B. Guerin From: Li -Ping Lung <Li-Ping.Lung@synopsys.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 9:49 AM To: Barry Chang Subject: your Town Hall meeting Dear Council Chang, I didn't see your invitation in time to attend your Town Hall meeting last Saturday, but I would like you to know that I firmly disagree with this General Plan Amendment and Housing Elements. I hope you will vote against this proposal. Please don't let me regret voting for you this last election. Sincerely, Li -Ping Lung Cupertino Residence Karen B. Guerin From: Ivy Wong <ivy_yinming@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 12:13 PM To: Ivy Wong Cc: Ivy Wong Subject: Cupertino School Cupertino City Council Member, Community members are concerned that the Cupertino General Plan amendments will reduce the quality of life in Cupertino. Possible effects of the amendments include the following concerns: - More and taller buildings - Vanishing opportunities to create parks and schools - Over -crowded schools and over -crowded neighborhoods - Increased traffic at schools and on major streets throughout the city - Growth that impacts some neighborhoods much more than others The Cupertino General Plan amendments that are proposed by the City were created without sufficient input from the community. Opportunities for community input were not communicated effectively, and participation in the input sessions was very low. I urge the Cupertino City Council to take the following steps: - Stop consideration of General Plan amendments until the City listens and responds to more community members. - Show residents why the General Plan must be amended. Show us one project at a time. Listen to community input for each development project. Do not re -zone a parcel until the following actions are complete: 1. The developer presents a plan for development 2. The community approves the plan for development - No rezoning of Vallco Ivy Wong Resident of Cupertino School District 354 Kellogg Way Santa Clara, CA 95051 Karen B. Guerin From: Eash Iyer <eashwarsiyer@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 9:24 PM To: City Council Subject: Stop consideration of General Plan amendments Dear Cupertino City Council Members, Community members are concerned that the Cupertino General Plan amendments will reduce the quality of life in Cupertino. Possible effects of the amendments include the following concerns: - More and taller buildings -.Vanishing opportunities to create parks and schools - Over -crowded schools and over -crowded neighborhoods - Increased traffic at schools and on major streets throughout the city - Growth that impacts some neighborhoods much more than others The Cupertino General Plan amendments that are proposed by the City were created without sufficient input from the community. Opportunities for community input were not communicated effectively, and participation in the input sessions was very low. I urge the Cupertino City Council to take the following steps: - Stop consideration of General Plan amendments until the City listens and responds to more community members. - Show residents why the General Plan must be amended. Show us one project at a time. Listen to community input for each development project. Do not re -zone a parcel until the following actions are complete: 1,. The developer presents a plan for development 2. The community approves the plan for development - No rezoning of Vallco Name: Eashwar Iyer Email: eashwarsiyer@yahoo.com Address: 4831 Capistrano Ave, San Jose, CA - 95129 I Karen B. Guerin From: c chen <cgchen5@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 12:02 PM To: Barry Chang; Orrin Mahoney; Mark Santoro; dapaul@darcypaul.org; savita4council@gmail.com Subject: My concern for Cupertino General Plan amendments Hello all, I'm looking to buy a house in Cupertino close to vallco mall area. I'm very concerned on proposed plan for rezoning Vallco Mall. Particularly the negative effect for schools close by. May I get a timeline for this proposal and when will the city make a go/no go decision? Thank you. Changqing Chen Karen B. Guerin From: Kathy Robinson <krobinson@charitieshousing.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 02; 2014 11:48 AM To: City Council Subject: Adoption of General Plan and Housing Element Dear Councilmembers, I would like to urge you to adopt the draft General Plan and Housing Element for the City of Cupertino this evening. It contains a reasonable balance of commercial and housing development opportunities which is important for Cupertino to remain as a health and vibrant community. I understand that there are those in our community that would like to limit further residential development, but I believe that by allowing the expansion of commercial opportunities, Apple being a primary one, which brings in a large number of new employees, the city has a responsibility to provide places for a percentage of these new employees, and the support/service folks who will also be required, to live. By providing housing, to folks of all income ranges, close to employment, retail and commercial centers, traffic will be reduced and the environment that we all care about will be protected. Thank you for your consideration. If you have questions, I can be reached at the number below. Kathy Robinson 10679 Farallone Dr. Cupertino 408 410 7287 Karen B. Guerin From: The Yuens <sixyuens@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:38 AM To: City Council Subject: Development in Cupertino Dear Members of our City Council, I have been very frustrated with the parking configurations of the new developments in Cupertino. As we continue to add thousands of new residents to our community with the new developments, each household will need to drive to eat in our restaurants, shop to get groceries, school supplies, commute to work and drop off their children in the rain. I believe when the city was considering development years ago behind Vallco the parking formula was 1.3 parking spaces per unit to allow for maximum housing units.. This translates to 4.parking spaces for 3 apartments. This seems like a ridiculously low number for this area. The parking spaces at all of the new retail locations including the Cupertino Library is grossly inadequate and contributes to the frustration and anger toward others which does not contribute to a good attitude within our community. I believe good city planning would include better traffic flow and require adequate parking to create a more tranquil and civil community, rather than the stressful irritated mood that overcomes me when I shop in Cupertino. I must admit that often I will travel to sites outside of Cupertino to shop so I do not have to deal with the terrible parking at our local strip malls. I understand that this pattern is not good for tax revenue for Cupertino, however for my own mental health I will happily drive further to avoid the stress of the inadequate parking lots in Cupertino. As you have added more retail space, the parking has been woefully inadequate ie• Trader Joes, expansion at Marukai strip mall, expansion at the strip mall with 85 degree Bakery. As you consider more development in Cupertino, please consider the community development - not the number of housing units - but the development of a city that is pleasant to live in - where every day living and shopping and errands is not something to dread. Thank you for your consideration, Ione Yuen Karen B. Guerin From: Jean Shu <jeancws@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 10:03 PM To: Gilbert Wong; Rod Sinks; Barry Chang; City Council; dapaul@darcypaul.org; savita4council@gmail.com Subject: concern over general plan amendments Dear city council members, My name is Ching Shyu and I live near the corner of Miller/Wolfe & Stevens Creek Blvd. I am writing today to urge you to not approve the proposed General Plan amendments because they include a controversial Vallco project that has not had broad community input (Note 1). The project will adversely affect nearby residents' quality of life (due to traffic - congestion and its related problems - Note 2) and disproportionately overcrowd our neighborhood schools..Approving the proposed plan would violate the first guideline of General Plan printed in the presentation of community workshop: "ensure any changes to the General Plan do not adversely affect Cupertino's quality of life or public service, including schools." (From the 10/23/13 community -wide workshop #2 - presentation -setting and opportunity report) Instead, please amend the General Plan one project at a time, and allow input for each plan from the community. No rezoning of Vallco without a development plan. Please spread the housing allocation evenly over all of Cupertino, for example (use Attachment T data): 873 units (the housing units chosen in the minimum growth alternative) +344 units (site #3 - the Hampton) +1 51,units (site #10 - 20916, 20956, 20990 Homestead Rd.) + 27 units (site #14 - Foothill &McClellan Center (Foothill Market)) + 14 units (site #15 - 22690 Stevens Creek Blvd) = 1409 units There is no urgency to pass the proposed General Plan which ignores the facts that current approved projects (Apple 2, Main_street, Rose Bowl, Biltmore, 5403/5405 Stevens Creek Blvd office) will put a strain on streets in our area (Note 3) due to their limited capacity. The Vallco project will add thousands of vehicles in the already congested streets in our area. It primes the city for a future plagued by traffic jams (especially so in the East (of De Anza Rd) part of Cupertino) during peak hours, poor air quality in the East part of Cupertino, and increased traffic around schools in that area. We are proud of Cupertino for being a model city with a responsive government, good schools, free flow of traffic, and no pollution thus far. The proposed General Plan goes against those values that made Cupertino the city it is today. Please listen to our concerns. Note 1: All community input meetings/workshops were held before the end of January 2014. The Vallco project (2million sq. ft. office & 600 residence) was put into the General Plan amendment process after that. The planning department has never sent a regular mail notice to the neighborhood of the big controversial change for community input. Note 2: Problems -of and related to traffic congestion include time wasted due to traffic, pollution caused by cars stuck in traffic, school traffic safety, traffic on neighboring residential streets causing safety and health risk (bad air quality) problems. Note 3: According to EIR Transportation and Traffic, even under the 2040 No Project scenario, there are 8 intersections that would operate at unacceptable levels of service with long delays during peak hours, which include Wolfe/Miller & Stevens Creek Blvd, Tantau & Stevens Creek Blvd, Stevens Creek Blvd and 1-280 SB, Wolfe and 1-280 Northbound, De Anza & Stevens Creek Blvd etc. (EIR page 4.13-43) Sincerely yours, Ching Shyu, Cupertino resident Karen B. Guerin From: Xiaowen Wang <xiaowenw@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 2:22 PM To: City Council; City Clerk; dapaul@darcypaul.org; Savita Vaidhyanathan Subject: GPA: EIR conclusions questionable Dear Council member, Accompanying the GPA is the EIR report (http://www.cupertinogpa.org/app folders/view/177) which supposes to evaluate the environmental impacts of the proposed GPA. This 1265 page report contains a lot data and provides crucial inputs to planning our city's future. It is unimaginable to have a proper GPA based on a questionable EIR. Given the limited time I have, I only be able to go through small part of the EIR. However, only the small part I went through demonstrates significant flaws. Here I am going to show you some problems in the School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis (http://www.cupertinogpa.org/files/managed/Document/210/AppendixF PublicServices.pdf). This is a 59 page document as part of Appendix F of the total 9 appendices of EIR. If you are tired of what I am going to point out below, think about how long I might write for the entire EIR report. Now it begins. Colleen Lettire From: Karen B. Guerin Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 4:57 PM To: City Clerk Subject: FW: Cupertino or Franstino From: pamela [pamelakhershey@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 4:51 PM To: Gilbert Wong; Rod Sinks; Orrin Mahoney; Mark Santoro; Barry Chang Subject: Re: Cupertino or Franstino Just wanted you all to know I would be at rally tonight to Keep Cupertino Safe!! But I have to work ! Thank you Pamela Hershey Resident for 40 years ! Sent from my iPhone On Oct 25, 2014, at 4:08 PM, Pam Hershey <pamelakhersheygaol.com>, wrote: Dear City Council, I am truly amazed and very concerned about the many projects that are in the planning stage for the city of Cupertino. My family and I have lived in Cupertino since 1967 and understand change and growth but NEAR would dream that we would be living in a big city. Why not rename it San Franstino !! If I wanted to live in San Franciso I would have moved there. How much traffic can Wolfe road hold??? It was not build to be in the middle of a large city. Not only traffic but population??? Another longtime resident moving out as soon as we retire and I hope that all of the city council members that voted for this congestion stay on the city and fight the traffic or many years. Please consider the beautiful town of Cupertino while you are making these ridiculous changes so rapidly Thank you for understanding the quality of life for the residents should be one of your main concerns! Pam Hershey CC 12-2-14 Item # 2 Kirsten Squarcia From: Lisa Warren <la-warren@att.net> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 2:19 PM To: Planning Dept.; City of Cupertino Planning Dept.; City Council; City Clerk; David Brandt; Aarti Shrivastava; savita4council@gmail.com; Darcy Paul Subject: GPA and Housing Element - Subject unit number vs. square footage City Counsel, Planning Commission, and Planning Department - would like to share a frustration that I have about the way housing is discussed, zoned and approved. Simply put, I find it troublesome that housing is the only type of development that is quantified by 'number of units'. Office, commercial, retail are defined by square footage. By using a unit number for housing, there is truly no limit to the size/bulk/mass of the structures that encompass the housing units (and also include additional interior square footage for common spaces, and, in some instances, private spaces that extend past the actual unit measurements). I requested some data from the city related to this curiosity/concern of mine. While the numbers are not a complete picture of the entire inventory of Cupertino's non single family homes, I believe that it illustrates some of the issues with how things are interpreted. I tried to include older and newer projects, as time changes 'flavor'. I did not include Montebello condos which I believe are actually larger units, on average. If anyone is interested in the raw numbers, please let me know. I asked the following: 1 would like to get the listed info for housing units at Rosebowl (Nineteen800), Main Street, Biltmore newer construction, Hamptons, Metropolitan, # of units total square footage of all units combined in project • total square footage of all interior space (common area's included) - l was attempting to get a figure that was combined total of units plus common area, but the numbers here were smaller than total unit sf, so 1 went on the assumption that the figures quoted were for the interior common areas without unit sf when doing my calculations. breakdown of number of unit 'types' within the project Some things I noted when crunching numbers - you may want to calculate on you own: Imagine if the average size of 600 Vallco units is similar to Rosebowl (Nineteen800). Numbers for Rosebowl were given as 204 units , 383,913 sf of CC 12-2-14 Item # 2 residential units, 32,276 interior sf for community center and courtyard - so 2,040 sf of combined interior space per unit -average. 600 like this would be 1,224,085 square feet. This is in the ballpark of what the TOTAL existing square footage is at Vallco (reported as 1,200,000 - 1,300,000) The considered 600 units could be more... could be less..... Do we want an additional 3 projects like Rosebowl concentrated on Vallco acreage, along with whatever else is zoned there ?!! When Sand Hill 'sold' the Main Street loft idea to the city, the units were described as being one bedroom and studio units that would discourage 'families' with school age children/teens. These units may attract that type of tenant, however, the 1,225 sf (1,465 sf including additional interior space) average PER UNIT size is larger than what I calculate as the average 'per bedroom' square foot figure when considering the data given for the projects highlighted above. (that number is close to 880 sf -based on 1,346,992 sf for 1532 'bedrooms') Please perform your own calculations if this sounds 'off to you. Again, I have number crunched on my own, given data (that I can share) supplied by the planning department. Hotels are also tricky. Room count is approved.... but total square footage is not guaranteed in the mix as to what governing bodies put a stamp of approval on. Common area aside, an approved room count for a hotel with average room SIZE of 350 sf is a very different animal than one with average room size of 700 sf. Lisa Warren 408-472-9879 ps..... with they type of design that is currently'the trend' (high ceilings),. the idea of cubic feet vs. square feet is something to think about also, with every type of building. Perhaps the height increases that are so often requested, and given, would be unnecessary if ceiling heights are minimized. z CL Q- a-19 . +OJ -n 4 -�— Karen B. Guerin From: Aseem Vaid <vaidaseem@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 S:24 PM To: Barry Chang Subject: Dismayed by rampant development along Stevens Creek Barry, I'm writing to you as a long time resident who is dismayed by the unchecked and unbalanced development in the City that is destroying our quality of life. We have already been impacted by the deterioration of traffic and safety along Stevens Creek, Wolfe, Pruneridge and deAnza due to mushrooming condo, retail and office campus development in these corridors. This has also visibly impacted crowding in our schools and reduced open spaces. The buildout of the Apple campus will only make this worse! Against this background, the currently tabled General Plan proposal to rezone the commercial areas, open up more condo development and rezone Vallco takes the cake ! Your office and the Council have an obligation to look after the resident's safety, facilities and quality of life above all other interests. I urge you to consider this and vote against this measure! thx, Aseem Karen B. Guerin From: Aseem Vaid <vaidaseem@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 5:22 PM To: Rod Sinks Subject: Dismayed by rampant development along Stevens Creek Dear Mr Sinks, I'm writing to you as a long time resident who is dismayed by the unchecked and unbalanced development in the City that is destroying our quality of life. We have.already been impacted by the deterioration of traffic and safety along Stevens Creek, Wolfe, Pruneridge and deAnza due to mushrooming condo, retail and office campus development in these corridors. This has also visibly impacted crowding in our schools and reduced open spaces. The buildout of the Apple campus will only make this worse! Against this background, the currently tabled General Plan proposal to rezone the commercial areas, open up more condo development, and rezone Vallco takes the cake ! Your office and the Council have an obligation to look after the resident's safety, facilities and quality of life above all other interests. - I urge you to consider this and vote against this measure! thx, Aseem .1 Karen B. Guerin From: Aseem Vaid <vaidaseem@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 5:21 PM To: Orrin Mahoney Subject: Dismayed by rampant development along Stevens Creek Dear Mr Mahoney, I'm writing to you as a long time resident who is dismayed by the unchecked and unbalanced development in the City that is destroying our quality of life. We have already been impacted by the deterioration of traffic and safety along Stevens Creek, Wolfe, Pruneridge and deAnza due to mushrooming condo, retail and office campus development in these corridors. This has also visibly impacted crowding in our schools and reduced open spaces. The buildout of the Apple campus will only make this worse! Against this background, the currently tabled General Plan proposal to rezone the commercial areas, open up more condo development and rezone Valico takes the cake ! Your office and the Council have an obligation to look after the resident's safety, facilities and quality of life above all other interests. I urge you to consider this and vote against this measure! thx, Aseem Karen B. Guerin -From: Aseem Vaid <vaidaseem@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 5:11 PM To: Gilbert Wong Subject: Dismayed by rampant development along Stevens Creek Dear Mayor Wong, I'm writing to you as a long time resident who is dismayed by the unchecked and unbalanced development in the City that is destroying our quality of life. We have already been impacted by the deterioration of traffic and safety along Stevens Creek, Wolfe, Pruneridge and deAnza due to mushrooming condo, retail and office campus development in these corridors. This has also visibly impacted crowding in our schools and. reduced open spaces. The. buildout of the Apple campus will only make this worse! Against this background, the currently tabled General Plan proposal to rezone the commercial areas, open up more condo development and rezone Vallco takes the cake Your office and the Council have an obligation to look after the resident's safety, facilities and quality of life above all other interests. I urge you to consider this and vote against this measure! thx, Aseem I Karen B. Guerin From: Aseem Vaid <vaidaseem@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2014 5:07 PM To: Mark Santoro Subject: Rampant development along Stevens Creek Mark, I'm writing to you as a long time resident who is very concerned about rampant development in the City that is destroying our quality of life. We have already been impacted by the deterioration of traffic and safety along Stevens Creek, Wolfe, Pruneridge and deAnza due to mushrooming condo, retail and office campus development in these corridors. This has also visibly impacted crowding in our schools and reduced open spaces. The buildout of the Apple campus will only make this worse! Against this background, the currently tabled General Plan proposal to rezone the commercial areas, open up more condo development and rezone Vallco takes the cake ! I urge you to vote against this measure! thx, Aseem CC 12-2-14 Item # 2 Kirsten Squarcia From: Mette Christensen <mettec@silikone.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 1:15 PM To: City Council; City Clerk; dapaul@darcypaul.org; Savita Vaidhyanathan Cc: better-cupertino-work-group@googlegroups.com Subject: Distribution of housing within Cupertino on I suppose as current and new City Council members you have heard several times that residents are alarmed about the housing distribution proposed within the City in the GPA. Specially, how it was decided to have 1300 or so housing units in the Vallco / Hamptons areas. If the city council makes sure to spread out the "burden" of the housing units in a more balanced way than what was discussed in November, I think it will be easier for residents within all of Cupertino to accept, digest and handle the impact of adding housing and offices according to the requirements in the GPA. Same would would be true for the office sq feet allocation suggested. Add some of the office allocation to not only be in the Vallco / New Apple HQ part of town, but balanced within the city to include areas west of De Anza. Think of 280 as a divider of the City East / West and De Anza being the North / South divider of the city. Below you can see a suggested distribution of housing that the city council should consider in order to distribute the impact of added housing and offices more evenly. The impact of housing units allocated to the Hamptons north of 280 will be minimal for Cupertino as they are right next to Apple HQ and will not be increasing student population within CUSD nor FUHSD as this is Santa Clara School District. The feedback from Santa Clara school district was that impact there would be minimal for their schools. Traffic would be less of an issue as traffic to and from work would mainly be walking / biking to the Apple CC 12-2-14 Item # 2 Campus. Surface street traffic such as getting to supermarkets would be crossing Wolfe, or freeway to de Anza/Homestead or Lawrence/Stevens Creek exits. School access would be in a different direction and avoid the impact on Stevens Creek, Finch, Tantau and Bollinger for the areas schools. Hence, it seems as a good solution to increase or maximize the number of housing units at the Hamptons. There were several sites available for housing units for the south of 280 corridor available and which would satisfy the above allocation of housing distributed more evenly within the city. Balancing out the impact is key to residents. Make sure to add housing units in the area West of De Anza. Marina, or Oaks sites would be perfect for housing and the area between Target and Whole Foods for offices. Locating all the housing and offices in the Vallco / Stevens Creek area is simply impossible given the impact to traffic and schools in that area. In combination with new Apple HQ, Main Street and Rose Bowl that are still in progress the area can simply not "handle" any more without major infrastructure improvements. Specially, as Santa Clara has approved the new 6 story office building to be constructed where the current IHOP restaurant is currently located. Stevens Creek is already a bottle neck without the 4000 or so expected cars from Apple HQ when they will start getting in and out of Stevens Creek as well. Please revisit the distribution of housing and offices to balance out the impact to all areas of the city Regards Mette Christensen Mette Christensen 10095 Judy Avenue Cell: 408 348 3637 mette(acloud501. corn www.cloud50l.com Karen B. Guerin From: Dennis Vaughn <dennisdvaughn@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 10:01 PM To: Barry Chang Subject: December 2nd Meeting .Dear Honorable Barry Chang, Good evening. I am writing to express my concern over the proposed amendment to the city plan and approving only the minimum for the housing component. I live in a townhome on Finch Avenue across from Cupertino High School. 'I'm very concerned about potential changes to Valco and the concentrated amount of housing units proposed for east Cupertino. At this point I'd like to see the council: *Approve only the minimum for the housing element. Do not approve the entire GPA (General Plan Amendment) without additional discussion *Spread the housing units evenly over all parts of Cupertino *No rezoning of Vallco without a development plan the residents accept Thank you, Dennis Vaughn Cupertino Resident Karen B. Guerin From: Dennis Vaughn <dennisdvaughn@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 9:59 PM To: Rod Sinks Subject: December 2nd Meeting Dear Honorable Rod Sinks, Good evening. I am writing to express my concern over the proposed amendment to the city plan and approving only the minimum for the housing component. I live in a townhome on Finch Avenue across from Cupertino High School. I'm very concerned about potential changes to Valco and the concentrated amount of housing units proposed for east Cupertino. At this point I'd like to see the council: *Approve only the minimum for the housing element. Do not approve the entire GPA (General Plan Amendment) without additional discussion *Spread the housing units evenly over all parts of Cupertino *No rezoning of Vallco without a development plan the residents accept Thank you, Dennis Vaughn Cupertino Resident Karen B. Guerin From: Dennis Vaughn <dennisdvaughn@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 9:58 PM To: Gilbert Wong Subject: December 2nd Meeting Dear Honorable Gilbert Wong, Good evening. I am writing to express my concern over the proposed amendment to the city plan and approving only the minimum for the housing component. I live in a townhome on Finch Avenue across from Cupertino High School. I'm very concerned about potential changes to Valco and the concentrated amount of housing units proposed for east Cupertino. At this point I'd like to see the council: *Approve only the minimum for the housing element. Do not approve the entire GPA (General Plan Amendment) without additional discussion *Spread the housing units evenly over all parts of Cupertino *No rezoning of Vallco without a development plan the residents accept Thank you, Dennis Vaughn Cupertino Resident I 1 Karen B. Guerin From: Ray Fang <rayfang@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 11:05 PM To: Barry Chang Subject: Concerns on Cupertino General Plan Amendments Dear Cupertino City Council Member, My name is Ray Fang. As one of Cupertino residents, I am concerned that the Cupertino General Plan Amendments will reduce the quality of life in Cupertino. Possible effects of the amendments include the following concerns: - Over -crowded schools and over -crowded neighborhoods - Increased traffic at schools and on major streets throughout the city - Less opportunities to create parks and schools I urge the Cupertino City.Council to take the following steps: - Stop consideration of General Plan Amendments until the City listens and responds to more community members. - Show residents why the General Plan must be amended. Show us one project at a time. Listen to community input for each development project. - Do not re -zone a parcel until the following actions are complete: 1. The developer presents a plan for development 2. The community approves the plan for development We need to make sure we understand the full depth of impact on traffic, school, emergency response, parks and recreation, safety of kids, and pollution. Regards, Ray Fang 10821 Brookwell Dr Cupertino, CA 95014 Email: rayfang@yahoo.com Karen B. Guerin From: Ray Fang <rayfang@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 11:05 PM To: Mark Santoro Subject: Concerns on Cupertino General Plan Amendments Dear Cupertino City Council Member, My name is Ray Fang. As one of Cupertino residents, I am concerned that the Cupertino General Plan Amendments will reduce the quality of life in Cupertino. Possible effects of the amendments include the following concerns: - Over -crowded schools and over -crowded neighborhoods - Increased traffic at schools and on major streets throughout the city - Less opportunities to create parks and schools I urge the Cupertino City Council to take the following steps: - Stop consideration- of General Plan Amendments until the City listens and responds to more community members. - Show residents why the General Plan must be amended. Show us one project at a time. Listen to community input for each development project. - Do not re -zone a parcel until the following actions are complete: 1. The developer presents a plan for development 2. The community approves the plan for development We need to make sure we understand the full depth of impact on traffic, school, emergency response, parks and recreation, safety of kids, and pollution. Regards, Ray Fang 10821 Brookwell Dr Cupertino, CA 95014 Email: rayfang@yahoo.com Karen B. Guerin From: Ray Fang <rayfang@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 11:04 PM To: Orrin Mahoney Subject: Concerns on Cupertino General Plan Amendments Dear Cupertino City Council Member, My name is Ray Fang. As one of Cupertino residents, I am concerned that the Cupertino General Plan Amendments will reduce the quality of life in Cupertino. Possible effects of the amendments include the following concerns: - Over -crowded schools and over -crowded neighborhoods - Increased traffic at schools and on major streets throughout the city - Less opportunities to create parks and schools I urge the Cupertino City Council to take the following steps: - Stop consideration of General Plan Amendments until the City listens and responds to more community members. - Show residents why the General Plan must be amended. Show us one project at a time. Listen to community input for each development project. - Do not re -zone a parcel until the following actions are complete: 1. The developer presents a plan for development 2. The community approves the plan for development We need to make sure we understand the full depth of impact on traffic, school, emergency response, parks and recreation, safety of kids, and pollution. Regards, Ray Fang 10821 Brookwell Dr Cupertino, CA 95014 Email: rayfang@yahoo.com Karen B. Guerin From: Ray Fang <rayfang@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 11:02 PM To: Gilbert Wong Subject: Concerns on Cupertino General Plan Amendments Dear Cupertino City Council Member, My name is.Ray Fang. As one of Cupertino residents, I am concerned that the Cupertino General Plan Amendments will reduce the quality of life in Cupertino. Possible effects of the amendments include the following concerns: - Over -crowded schools and over -crowded neighborhoods - Increased traffic at schools and on major streets throughout the city - Less opportunities to create parks and schools I urge the Cupertino City Council to take the following steps: - Stop consideration of General Plan Amendments until the City listens and responds to more community members. - Show residents why the General Plan must be amended. Show us one project. at a time. Listen to community input for each development project. - Do not re -zone a parcel until the following actions are complete: 1. The developer presents a plan for development 2. The community approves the plan for development We need to make sure we understand the full depth of impact on traffic, school, emergency response, V parks and recreation, safety of kids, and pollution. Regards, 'Ray Fang 10821 Brookwell Dr Cupertino, CA 95014 Email: rayfang@yahoo.com 1 Karen B. Guerin From: SS Tung <sstung@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 2:41 PM To: Gilbert Wong Subject: Cupertino City Council to revise the General Plan amendments and to rezone the Vallco [No] Dear Cupertino City Council Member Mr. Wong, I heard that Cupertino City Council is considering to revise the General Plan amendments and to rezone the Vallco. I have strong concerns on: - More and taller buildings - Vanishing opportunities to create parks and schools - Over -crowded schools and over -crowded neighborhoods - Under capacity and insufficient infrastructure - Increased traffic at schools and on major streets throughout the city - Growth that impacts some neighborhoods much more than others The Cupertino General Plan amendments that are proposed by the City were created without sufficient input from the community. Opportunities for community input were not communicated effectively, and participation in the input sessions was very low. I urge the Cupertino City Council to take the following steps: - Stop consideration of General Plan amendments until the City listens and responds to more community members. - Show residents why the General Plan must be amended transparently. Show us each individual project at a time. Listen to community input for every single development project. Do not re -zone a parcel until the developer complete the presentation of a plan for development and the community approves the plan for development - No rezoning of Vallco for better Cupertino in the future. Regards, Shangsheng Tung 10127 Colby Ave, Cupertino CA 95014 Karen B. Guerin From: SS Tung <sstung@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 2:43 PM To: Mark Santoro Subject: Cupertino City Council to revise the General Plan amendments and to rezone the Vallco [No] Dear Cupertino City Council Member Mr. Santoro, I heard that Cupertino City Council is considering to revise the General Plan amendments and to rezone the Vallco. I have strong concerns on: - More and taller buildings - Vanishing opportunities to create parks and schools - Over -crowded schools and over -crowded neighborhoods - Under capacity and insufficient infrastructure - Increased traffic at schools and on major streets throughout the city - Growth that impacts some neighborhoods much more than others The Cupertino General Plan amendments that`are proposed by the City were created without sufficient input from the community. Opportunities for community input were not communicated effectively, and participation in the input sessions was very low. I urge the Cupertino City Council to take the following steps: - Stop consideration of General Plan amendments until the City listens and responds to more community members. - Show residents why the General Plan must be amended transparently,. Show us each individual project at a time. Listen to community input for every single development project. Do not re -zone a parcel until the developer complete the presentation of a plan for development and the community approves the plan for development - Norezoning of Vallco for better Cupertino in the future. Regards, Shangsheng Tung 10127 Colby Ave, Cupertino CA 95014 Karen B. Guerin From: SS Tung <sstung@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 2:45 PM To: Rod Sinks Subject: Cupertino City Council to revise the General Plan amendments and to rezone the Vallco [No] Dear Cupertino City Council Member Mr. Sinks, I heard that Cupertino City Council is considering to revise the General Plan amendments and to rezone the Vallco. I have strong concerns on: - More and taller buildings - Vanishing opportunities to create parks and schools - Over -crowded schools and over -crowded neighborhoods - Under capacity and insufficient infrastructure - Increased traffic at schools and on major streets throughout the city - Growth that impacts some neighborhoods much more than others The Cupertino General Plan amendments that are proposed by the City were created without sufficient input from the community. Opportunities for community input were not communicated effectively, and participation in the input sessions was very low. I urge the Cupertino City Council to take the following steps: - Stop consideration of General Plan amendments until the City listens and responds to more community members. - Show residents why the General Plan must be amended transparently. Show us each individual project at a time. Listen to community input for every single development project. Do not re -zone a parcel until the developer complete the presentation of a plan for development and the community approves the plan for development - No rezoning of Vallco for better Cupertino in the future. Regards, Shangsheng Tung 10127 Colby Ave, Cupertino CA 95014 Karen B. Guerin From: SS Tung <sstung@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 2:45 PM To: Barry Chang Subject: Cupertino City Council to revise the General Plan amendments and to rezone the Vallco [No] Dear Cupertino City Council Member Mr. Chang, I heard that Cupertino City Council is considering to revise the General Plan amendments and to rezone the Vallco. I have strong concerns on: - More and taller buildings - Vanishing opportunities to create parks and schools - Over -crowded schools and over -crowded neighborhoods, - Under capacity and insufficient infrastructure - Increased traffic at schools and on major streets throughout the city - Growth that impacts some neighborhoods much more than others The Cupertino General Plan amendments that are proposed by the City were created without sufficient input from the community. Opportunities for community input were not communicated effectively, and participation in the input sessions was very low. I urge the Cupertino City Council to take the following steps: - Stop consideration of General Plan amendments until the City listens and responds to more community members. - Show residents why the General Plan must be amended transparently. Show us each individual project at a time. Listen to community input for every single development project. Do not re -zone a parcel until the developer complete the presentation of a plan for development and the community approves the plan for development - No rezoning of Vallco for better Cupertino in the future. Regards, Shangsheng Tung 10127 Colby Ave, Cupertino CA 95014 Karen B. Guerin From: SS Tung <sstung@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 2:44 PM To: Orrin Mahoney Subject: Cupertino City Council to revise the General Plan amendments and to rezone the Vallco [No] Dear Cupertino City Council Member Mr. Mahoney, I heard that Cupertino City Council is considering to revise the General Plan amendments and to rezone the Vallco. I have strong concerns on: - More and taller buildings - Vanishing opportunities to create parks and schools - Over -crowded schools and over -crowded neighborhoods - Under capacity and insufficient infrastructure - Increased traffic at schools and on major streets throughout the city - Growth that impacts some neighborhoods much more than others The Cupertino General Plan amendments that are proposed by the City were created without sufficient input from the community. Opportunities for community input were not communicated effectively, and participation in the input sessions was very low. I urge the Cupertino City Council to take the following steps: - Stop consideration of General Plan amendments until the City listens and responds to more community members. - Show residents why the General Plan must be amended transparently. Show us each individual project at a time. Listen to community input for every single development project. Do not re -zone a parcel until the developer complete the presentation of a plan for development and the community approves the plan for development - No rezoning of Vallco for better Cupertino in the future. Regards, Shangsheng Tung 10127 Colby Ave, Cupertino CA 95014 Karen B. Guerin From: betzd <betzd@pacbell.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 1:29 PM To: Rod Sinks Subject: Housing Allocation The proposed General Plan amendments (GPA) lack sufficient community input. I am concerned that more and larger buildings and high-density housing threaten traffic, schools, open spaces, and the general quality of life in Cupertino. I urge the Council to get more community input before adopting GPA. The Housing Allocation must .be approved soon. Approve the Housing Allocation with the following considerations: • Choose sites from all over the city (not all sites in one neighborhood). • Use as many parcels that are currently zoned for housing as possible. • Only if necessary: Re -zone parcels that are required for the Housing Allocation. • Do not include Vallco in the Housing Allocation; do'not re -zone Vallco for housing. Karen B. Guerin From: betzd <betzd@pacbell.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 1:30 PM To: Mark Santoro Subject: Housing The proposed General Plan amendments (GPA) lack sufficient community input. I am concerned that more and larger buildings and high-density housing threaten traffic, schools, open spaces, and the general quality of life in Cupertino. I urge the Council to get more community input before adopting GPA. The Housing Allocation must be approved soon. Approve the Housing Allocation with the following considerations: • Choose sites from all over the city (not all sites in one neighborhood). • Use as many parcels that are currently zoned for housing as possible. • Only if necessary: Re -zone parcels that are required for the Housing Allocation. • Do not include Vallco in the Housing Allocation; do not re -zone Vallco for housing. Karen B. Guerin From: betzd <betzd@pacbeII.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 1:30 PM To: Orrin Mahoney Subject: Housing The proposed General Plan amendments (GPA) lack sufficient community input. I am concerned that more and larger buildings and high-density housing threaten traffic, schools, open spaces, and the general quality of life in Cupertino. I urge the Council to get more community input before adopting GPA. The Housing Allocation must be approved soon. Approve the Housing Allocation with the following considerations: • Choose sites from all over the city (not all sites in one neighborhood).. • Use as many parcels that are currently zoned for housing as possible. • Only if necessary: Re -zone parcels that are required for the Housing Allocation. • Do not include Vallco in the Housing Allocation; do not re -zone Vallco for housing.. Karen B. Guerin From: betzd <betzd@pacbell.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 1:30 PM To: Barry Chang Subject: Housing Allocation The proposed General Plan amendments (GPA) lack sufficient community input. I am concerned that more and larger buildings and high-density housing threaten traffic, schools, open spaces, and the general quality of life in Cupertino. I urge the Council to get more community input before adopting GPA. The Housing Allocation must be approved soon. Approve the Housing Allocation with the following considerations: • Choose sites from all over the city (not all sites in one neighborhood). • Use as many parcels that are currently zoned for housing as possible. • Only if necessary: Re -zone parcels that are required for the Housing Allocation. • Do not include Vallco in the Housing Allocation; do not re -zone Vallco for housing. Karen B. Guerin From: betzd <betzd@pacbell.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 1:29 PM To: Rod Sinks Subject: Housing Allocation The proposed General Plan amendments (GPA) lack sufficient community input. I am concerned that more and larger buildings and high-density housing threaten traffic, schools, open spaces, and the general quality of life in Cupertino. I urge the Council to get more community input before adopting GPA. The Housing Allocation must be approved soon. Approve the Housing Allocation with the following considerations: • Choose sites from all over the city (not all sites in one neighborhood). • Use as many parcels that are currently zoned for housing as possible. • Only if necessary: Re -zone parcels that are required for the Housing Allocation. • Do not include Vallco in the Housing Allocation; do not re -zone Vallco for housing. 1 Karen B. Guerin From: betzd <betzd@pacbell.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 1:29 PM To: Gilbert Wong Subject: Housing allocation The proposed General Plan amendments (GPA) lack sufficient community input. I am concerned that more and larger buildings and high-density housing threaten traffic, schools, open spaces, and the general quality of life in Cupertino. I urge the Council to get more community input before adopting GPA. The Housing Allocation must be approved soon. Approve the Housing Allocation with the following considerations: • Choose sites from all over the city (not all sites in one neighborhood). • Use as many parcels that are currently zoned for housing as possible. • Only if necessary: Re -zone parcels that are required for the Housing Allocation. • Do not include Vallco in the Housing Allocation; do not re -zone Vallco for housing. Karen B. Guerin From: Randy Shingai <randyshingai@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 7:00 PM To: City Council; dapaul@darcypaul.org; Savita Vaidhyanathan; City Clerk Cc: better-cupertino-work-group@googlegroups.com Subject: Use of Government Code 65583.2(c)(3)(B) in the Draft Housing Element Attachments: heart of city housing inventory.pdf Dear Sirs: I have aproblem with the table on B-149 of the draft Housing Element. It has every proposed unit in the Heart of the City Special Area as being able to provide every unit with Affordability Levels of Very Low/Low. (See the attachment) This is justified by Government Code 65583.2(c)(3)(B). Here is 65583.2(c)(3): (3) For the number of units calculated to accommodate its share of the regional housing need for lower income households pursuant to paragraph.(2), a city or county shall do either of the following: (A) Provide an analysis demonstrating how the adopted densities accommodate this need. The analysis shall include, but is not limited to, factors such as market demand, financial feasibility, or information based on development project experience within a zone or zones that provide housing for lower income households. (B) The following densities shall be deemed appropriate to accommodate housing for lower income households: (i) For incorporated cities within nonmetropolitan counties and for nonmetropolitan counties that have micropolitan areas:. sites allowing at least 15 units per acre., (ii) For unincorporated areas in all nonmetropolitan counties not included in clause (i): sites allowing at least 10 units per acre. (iii) For suburban jurisdictions: sites allowing at least 20 units per acre. (iv) For jurisdictions in metropolitan counties: sites allowing at least 30 units per acre. So while the City is allowed to use 65583.2(c)(3)(B)(iv), it is not required to. The City has the option of using 65583.2(c)(3)(A). (A) Provide an analysis demonstrating how the adopted densities accommodate this need. The analysis shall include, but is not limited to, factors such as market demand, financial feasibility, or information based on development project experience within a zone or, zones that provide housing for lower income households. The'City has an obligation to use the best methodology available, especially when a reasonable person would know that using 65583.2(c)(3)(B) will yield erroneous information. If the City is sued for not meeting its RHNA targets, it will be because it intentionally based its plan on erroneous information: Information that it got by following the letter of the law, but not the spirit of the law. Please make sure this in the public record for the GPA public hearing. Randy Shingai Appendix B nousing dement iecnnicai Keport . Site 6: Berry Swenson Property Site 1 (The Oaks Shopping C/O/R 35 7.9 235 Very Low/Low' Center) P(CG, Res, OP) F Site 2 (Vallco Shopping C/O/R 35 ' 47.83 600 (max) Very Low/Low District) P(Regional Shopping, OP, Res) Site 4 (United Furniture/East C/O/R 25 f 4.86 103 Very Low/Low of East Estates Drive) P(CG, Res) Site 5 (Glenbrook Medium Density 20 31.34 93 Very Low/Low Apartments) R3(10-20) i :Site 6 (Barry Swenson) C/O/R 25 0.55 11 Very Low/Low i P(CG, Res) Total 92.48 1 1,042 Notes: (a) Realistic capacity for each site reduces the maximum developable units by 15 percent. (b) Identified capacity of sites that allow development densities of at least 20 units per acre are credited toward the lower-income RHNA based on State law. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65583.2(c)(3)(B), local governments may utilize "default" density standards to provide evidence that "appropriate zoning" is in place to support the development of housing for very -low and low-income households . The default density standard for Cupertino and other suburban jurisdictions in Santa Clara County is 20 dwelling units per acre QUA) or more. (c) Residential capacity for Site 5 reflects a net increase in units. Source: City of Cupertino, 2014 REVISED PUBLIC DRAFT B - 1 4 9 CC 12-2-14 Item # 2 Kirsten Squarcia From: Randy Shingai <randyshingai@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, November -30,2014 10:55 AM To: City Council; dapaul@darcypaul.org; Savita Vaidhyanathan; City Clerk Cc: better-cupertino-work-group@googlegroups.com Subject: Below Market Rate Program Hi everyone, I stumbled across this page on Cupertino's Below Market Rate Program. http://www.gljpertino.org/index.asl)x?page--301 Issues for the Public Hearing on the GPA There is a link to a "Housing Mitigation Manual" on that page. http://www. Cupertino. org/Modules/ShowDocument. aspx? documentid=446 If you look at that manual, dated November 18, 2002, there are few interesting things: 1.02.20 says that developers shall pay a fee as determined by the City Council 2.02.02 says that Residential developers shall designate at least 15% of the units in a development as "affordable" There are also links to a BMR For -Sale Units and a BMR Rental Inventory at the bottom of the page. http://www.cupertino. org/Modules/ShowDocuinent.aspx?documentid=8052 http://www. gupertino.org/Modules/ShowDocuinent.aspx?documentid=8063 I counted 133 BMR units in the rental inventory, and 28 units in the Affordable Housing for sale list. Here's the current RHNA requirement for Cupertino Income Category Very Low Low Moderate Above -Moderate Total Housing Need 356 207 231 270 1,064 The total for Moderate and below is 356 + 207 + 231 = 794 units. According to the BRM inventory lists, Cupertino has 161 BMR units in inventory, and the RHNA target is 794 units. I have the following questions for the City: CC 12-2-14 Item # 2 1. Is the Housing Mitigation Manual and its associated information current? If not where can I find current information? 2. What is the fee that developers pay according to 1.02.20? 3. Did the Biltmore, Rosebowl and Mainstreet apartments set aside 15% of their new units as per 2.02.20? 4. What plans does the City have to make progress on its RHNA BMR goals? Thanks! Randy Shingai San Jose 95129 Karen B. Guerin From: Jeff Ben & Tracy Hurt <HurtBen@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 10:20 AM To: City Council Cc: City Clerk Subject: Remarks regarding Agenda Items for Dec. 2nd City Council Meeting Attachments: Dec 2 Letter to Cupertino City Council.docx Dear Mayor and Council Members, Attached please find my remarks regarding the Draft Resolutions and Ordinances you will consider for adoption tonight. I hope to address a subset of these issues before you orally tonight. Please include my remarks in the public record of tonight's city Council meeting. I thank you for your time and consideration. Please be so kind as to have the City Clerk confirm receipt of this email. Thank -you. Respectfully submitted, Tracy L. Hurt December 2, 2014 Re: Opposition to Adoption of Draft Resolutions No. 14-210, 14-211, 14-212, 14- 213 and Draft Ordinances 14-2124 and 14-2125 Sent via email to citycouncilna cupertino.org and cityclerk@cupertino.org Dear Mayor Wong and Cupertino City Council Members, Thank you for taking the time to listen tonight. I am a resident of CUSD and FUHSD . attendance areas, the parent of a junior at Cupertino High School, and someone who has called Cupertino home for over 20 years. I respectfully request that tonight Council Members refrain from adopting Draft Resolution Nos. 14-210, 14-211; 14-212, and 14-213, as well as Draft Ordinances 14-2124 and 14-2125. In particular, new Council Members who are being sworn in tonight should abstain voting on these Draft Resolutions and Ordinances until they have the opportunity to fulfill their responsibility to read each of them in the entirety and to meet with the Cupertino Community and listen to their concerns regarding the proposals. To do otherwise . suggests these Council Members represent the developers, rather than the residents. I further request that the City Council refrain from adopting the above identified Draft Resolutions and Ordinances because the City has given the Community inadequate notice and opportunity to participate in the planning process. The, City implies in its Draft Resolutions and Ordinances that it. has complied with CEQA mandated notice requirements; however, the sheer number and complexity of the number of Draft Resolutions and Ordinances presented simultaneously requires that the Cupertino Community be given more time to respond to the proposed development plans. The City's efforts to notice to the Community have been inadequate as measured by the number of people who have participated. For example, the City states that 160 people participated in 4 workshops, however, people who attended multiple workshops would be counted multiple times. Even if 160 people total had attended these workshops that number is much too small given the total number of residents in Cupertino. According to the 2010 census Cupertino's population is 5 8,3 02 and City Lab states that as of May 4, 2009 the City had 27,489 registered voters. By these numbers the City has reached less than I% of the registered voters. Assuming that there is no overlap between the 160 workshop attendees.and the 300 people who subscribed to the Housing Element Website then the City has heard from 460 people. While this is an improvement, the City has still reached less than 2% of the registered voters! Given the sweeping changes proposed in the Draft Resolutions and Ordinances the City should take the additional time available to it under CEQA to reach and engage significantly greater numbers of the Cupertino Community before forcing through sweeping amendments to the General Plan. Tracy L. Hurt remarks 12/2/2014 Page 1 I understand that Cupertino is required by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to update the Housing Element of its General Plan within 120 days of January 31, 2015. No other amendment to the Cupertino General Plan is required by HCD at that time. Accordingly, I urge the City Council to amend only the Housing Element on or before May 31, 2015. The entire Community and region will benefit from the additional discussions that can and surely will take place. I understand that as part of the Housing Element the City is required by the HCD to identify sufficient sites to satisfy its projected Regional Housing Needs Allocation. (RHNA) The City's RHNA for the 2015-2023 time period is 1,064 new housing units. Additionally, State Law allows Cupertino to take credit for a total of 62 units bringing the required number of sites the City must identify to 1002 new units. See Draft Resolution No. 14-210, Exhibit EA -1, page 1-6, second paragraph. I urge City Council Members to identify no more than the minimum number of new RHNA units it is obligated to, rather than the proposed 1843 new units when it submits the Housing Element to HCD so that the Cupertino Community will have additional time to participate and to allow more equitable distribution of development across the East-West axis of the City. The City Housing Commission has identified at least nine RHNA sites. See Draft Resolution No. 14-210, Exhibit EA -1, page 1-6; which refers to the Draft EIR, Table 3-12, and pp. 3-68 to 3-70. Unfortunately, the draft EIR was unavailable electronically today so I cannot verify which sites of the original nineteen remain. I assume for the sake of the following arguments that the 35 acre Vallco site remains identified as a potential RHNA site. The Vallco site is special and requires careful consideration because of its location, size, current use and unique character. Accordingly, I request that the City exclude the Vallco site from the upcoming list of RHNA sites. Vallco is located in the extreme east of Cupertino, bounded approximately by I-280 S, Wolfe and Stevens Creek. It is undoubtedly the largest parcel of those identified and is home to unique recreation opportunities not available at Stanford Mall, Valley Fair or Santana Row by virtue of its bowling alley, ice skating rink and movie theaters. Furthermore, in contrast to its competitors that aim for the luxury consumer, squarely aimed at the middle class Vallco's Penney's and Sears are also unavailable in Palo Alto, Mountain View, Sunnyvale, Santa Clara and Campbell. These factors all argue against major changes to Vallco. Finally, the crowning glory of the Vallco site is the colonnade of trees the marches down both sides of Wolfe, Stevens Creek and along Perimeter Road. They form a narrow park that the City should fiercely protect and extend. Their location in the far east. of the City makes these trees and their associated sidewalks especially precious. They should be included on the City's list of Heritage Trees under Cupertino City Ordinance 14.18.070. Despite repeated searches of the City's website I can find no such list. No change in the zoning, use or character of Vallco should take place until the adjacent trees have been placed on the Heritage Tree List. Finally, the Vallco site should not be zoned for housing because its size and location offer a unique opportunity to provide park land and open space to the most underserved area of the City. In contrast to the west side of Tracy L. Hurt remarks 12/2/2014 Page 2 Cupertino, which has nearly 3 acres of open space per thousand residents, the east side of Cupertino currently has less than 0.3 acres of open space per -thousand residents: That amount will be even less once the housing units about to open along Stevens Creek from De Anza to Tantau. are opened. The City must preserve, extend and add parks to the east side of Cupertino. East Cupertino is currently bearing the brunt of development without reaping any of the benefits. What happened to the millions of dollars the City made by selling Pruneridge Ave to Apple? Why isn't that money being applied to adding parks and open space to the east side? If the City can't or won't add Parks to the area at the very least it should preserve the recreation opportunities currently available at Vallco. For these and other reasons, I respectfully request that the City Council refrain from adopting the Final EIR tonight. I remain opposed to developing housing on"the Vallco site at this time; however, assuming arguendo that housing is to be developed there I am opposed to the proposed density of 3 5 units per acre. See Proposed General Plan Amendment, Attachment N: Balanced Plan Map, under "Yallco Shopping District Special Area. HCD has identified a density of 20 units per acre as adequate to encourage development of affordable housing. Housing Commission Housing Staff Report of Feb. 12, 2014, page 4. " [T]he City's responsibility is to demonstrate adequate capacity by identifying specific sites; to satisfy the RHNA under existing zoning and land use policy." Ibid, page 2 (emphasis added). Accordingly, the City Council can and must refrain from -amending current. ordinances to permit densities of more than 20 units per acre at Vallco and throughout the City. Finally, I object to the Final EIR and demand that City Council does not certify it in its current form. I object to the Final EIR because it fails to mitigate the indirect environmental impact upon Cupertino High School of the development of City Center, the Rose Bowl and the Apple Campus. In particular, the City has failed to mitigate the danger to pedestrians, bikers and skateboarders at the intersections of Finch and Stevens Creek and Tantau and Stevens Creek caused by the increased traffic. This indirect impact on the schools facilities must be considered and mitigated. See Chawanakee Unified School District v. County of Madera, Cal. App. 5 Dist, June 21, 2011. In Chawanakee Unified the court held that "impact on traffic is not an impact on school facilities and, as a result, the impact on traffic must be considered in the EIR." Id. Restriping of the road will not be adequate mitigation. The City should look into a variety of possible mechanisms to improve pedestrian safety including but not limited to flashing lights embedded in the cross walk itself, bulb outs on all four corners of the intersection, a pedestrian bridge over the street and hiring crossing guards and even bussing of students. One of the easiest and most effective mitigations at this point would be to defer further construction along the area bounded by Wolfe, Homestead, Tantau and Stevens Creek until after completion of Apple, the Rose Bowl and City Center. Without mitigations for pedestrian and biker safety at these intersections it is only a. matter of time before an Apple employee or `lino student is killed by a car. I therefore request that the City Council refrain from adopting the Mitigation Monitoring Tracy L. Hurt remarks 12/2/2014 Page 3 and Reporting Program for the Project, Exhibit EA -2 until it has been amended to mitigate the indirect impacts to Cupertino High School. Tracy L. Hurt remarks 12/2/2014 Page 4 I thank the City Council for their time and consideration of my remarks. Respectfully submitted, Tracy L. Hurt Tracy L. Hurt remarks 12/2/2014 Page 5 Andrea Sanders From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status:. Categories: Dear Sirs, Xiaowen Wang <xiaowenw@gmail.com> Monday, December 01, 2014 3:55 PM City Council; City Clerk, dapaul@darcypaul.org; Savita Vaidhyanathan GPA: EIR conclusions questionable Follow up Flagged City Clerk CC 12-2-14 Item #2 This is regrading the GPA EIR report (http://www.cupertinogpa.orWapp folders/view/177). This 1265 page report contains a lot of data and provides crucial inputs to the GPA. It is not imaginable to plan our future if the conclusions of EIR are wrong. With my time constraints (full time job and two kids), I only went through a small part of EIR. Shockingly, just the small part of EIR demonstrates a lot of problems. Here I will list a few I spotted in the School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis (http://www.cupertinogpa.ora/files/managed/D6cument/210/AppendixF PublicServigg"df). This 59 page document is part of Appendix F of total 9 appendices of the EIR. Forgive me if you feel the below list is too long, just think about how long the list could be for the entire EIR. 1. Enrollment data cited from wrong source. Table 5-4 Enrollment Projection by, High School - FUHSD cites source as Enrollment Projection Consultants who is the demographer used by both CUSD and FUHSD. The original EPC report can be found at FUHSD website, http://fuhsd.ca.schoolloop.com/file/1220712390804/1224957816940/6135832176609743503.pdf. The total enrollment cited in this table is 12, 036 in 2020. This is consistent with Projected Student Population in Table 2 of original EPC report. However, it is explicitly stated in the "Understanding Data in Table 2" session in the EPC report, V . "These are not projected enrollments". The right enrollment data is in Table l ,of EPC report, in which the projection of 2020 is 12135. 2. SGR cited is different from the source. In the same original EPC report, there is a dedicated session of "Projected Impacts of New Housing". The last paragraph especially addressed the SGR of the recent apartment complex (regular ATT). Here is what the report states, "The recent "Regular ATT" units in the CUSD, on the other hand, have a much higher 0.12 high school SGR. The 0.35 TK -8 SGR in those dwellings also indicates the 9-12 SGR will become even larger in the next few years." However, the SGR used in EIR is 0.32 for.. TK -8 and 0.07 for 9=12. I have been assured by both planning commission and FUHSD enrollment office this report is the source for the EIR. But some how information is lost in copying. CC 12-2-14 Item #2 3. Employment impact on enrollment is completely ignored. In section 4.2.3 of the report, factors that may affect the enrollment number is discussed. Employment is identified as one of major factor that contributes to school enrollment. In the GPA, alternative C proposes 4,040,231 sf office space. In the letter from SCUSD (http://www.cupertinogpa.org/files/managed/Document/374/CC LateCommentsMemo.pdf), it uses the calculation that every 1664sf of office space would result in one household in the school district. Per such calculation, the proposed office space would generate another 2428 households on top of the proposed residential units. This number is 1000 more than the residential units proposed in Alternative A. Moreover, it is noted in the report that the young single employee worked in Apple or other offices in Cupertino would grow old and potentially to raise family in Cupertino. "Yet the preferences of these young employees are likely to change as they age, have families, have less interest in San Francisco activities, and have an increased aversion to the time spent in commuting. The quality of local schools will influence their choice of housing location. It is also likely that the average income of these employees would be adequate to afford housing in Cupertino. This would create demand by young families for housing in the Cupertino District." So even the new apartment built for singles could generate enrollment increase eventually. Unfortunately, the EIR use a big zero when counting such a great impact. 4. Enrollment impact is inappropriately evaluated The major argument for LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT is that the enrollment increase caused by the new housing project is just a small percentage of the overall enrollment projection. For example, CUSD is going to have 12,511 students in elementary school by 2040 but only 899 come from the new housing project. But if you take a close look at the data in the report, e.g., Table 4-11 and Table 4-12 (summarized in httr)s•//docs google com/spreadsheets/d/l T6urxEaoWv8l72iwwx5eTri)kOERYZgLrlvsOzDPIkF8/edit? usp=sharing), you would find basically, without the new housing, by 2040 elementary school enrollment will be down by 189, therefore all the enrollment increase is coming from proposed housing element. In some schools such as Collins, 274 out of 309 enrollment increase is coming from new housing project, which counts more than a quarter for projected enrollment of Collins. The only way to make the logic in the report valid is to distribute the housing units evenly in all school attendance area. Unfortunately, this is not the case in GPA. 5. Three out of four school impacts are not addressed. In section 2 School Facility Standard, standards on classroom, other building, land area and accessibility are introduced. It is then acknowledged that a lot of our schools are overstressed on all the areas, not only we have more than state recommended potables (27% vs. 20% in elementary schools now) but also as noted in section 4.2.1 Housing Projection, "Some educational support facilities - cafeteria/general purpose spaces, administrative offices, support classrooms for music/art or for students with targeted needs, playground space and facilities, etc. - are also below standard." CC 12-2-14 Item #2 However, in section 4.4.3 Facility Improvement Plan, only one improvement option is discussed, i.e., building a two story classroom building. Basically, there is no mitigation plan to meet the state requirement on school common buildings, school land area and school accessibility. Overall, based on the data in this school impact report, the conclusion I would draw is the current GPA has SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE impact on school. The GPA would significantly increase the school enrollment in the impacted area and no feasible mitigation scheme could meet the state standards on school buildings and land area. The above mistakes are not singular in the EIR. For example, LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT conclusion on park land is made with similar calculation of using city wide number instead of number of the impacted area. Finally'I would urge the City Council discard this version of EIR and hold any GPA vote until we have a credible EIR. Please make this part of the public record for December 2, 2014 Regular Council Meeting. Thanks, Xiaowen Wang Cupertino resident CC 12-2-14 Item #2 Andre&Sanders From:, Srinivas Sirikonda <sirikonda-s@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 201411:43 AM To: City Council; City Clerk Subject: FW: Demand Safer Streets around Vallco and Cupertino High -Model Letter Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status:" Flagged Categories: City Clerk HI, Thanks, Srinivas Sirikonda ' 450 Harvard Ave, 1 E Santa Clara, CA 95051. Tracy Hurt, Cascade Park If you care about Vallco-and the streets around it and Cupertino High but can't make tonight's Rally or Cupertino City Council meeting, you could still do something. Below you'll a model letter that'you cah' easily " modify. Email addresses included. Tracy Re: Demand for Safer Streets around Cupertino High School and Vallco Sent via email to citycouncil@cupertino.org and cityclerk@cupertino.org Dear Mayor Wong and Cupertino City Council Members, am a resident of CUSD and FUHSD attendance areas. As part of the Housing Element the City is required by the HCD to identify sufficient sites to satisfy its projected Regional Housing Needs Allocation. (RHNA) The City's RHNA for the 2015-2023 time°period is 1,064 new housing units'. Additionally, State Law allows Cupertino to take credit for a total of 62 units bringing the required number of sites the City must identify to 1002 new units. See Draft Resolution No: 14 210, EA -1, page I- 6, second paragraph. I urge City.Council Members to identify no more than the minimum number of new RHNA units it is -obligated to, rather than the proposed 1843 new units when it submits the Housing Element to HCD. The City Housing Commission has identified at least nine RHNA sites. See Draft Resolution No. 14-210, Exhibit EA -1, page 1-6; which refers to the Draft EIR, Table 3-12, and pp. 3-68'to 3=70 1 assume'for the sake of the following arguments that the 35 acre Vallco site remains identified as a.potential RHNA site. The Vallco site is special and requires careful consideration because of its location; size, current use and unique character. Accordingly, I request that the City exclude the Vallco site from the upcoming list of RHNA sites. Vallco is located in the extreme east of Cupertino, bounded approximately by 1-280 S, Wolfe and Stevens Creek. It is undoubtedly the largest parcel of those. identified and is home to unique recreation opportunities not available at Stanford Mall, Valley Fair or Santana Row by virtue of its bowling alley, ice skating rink and movie theaters. Furthermore, in contrast to its competitors that aim.for the luxury consumer, squarely aimed at the middle class Vallco's Penney's and Sears are also unavailable in Palo Alto, Mountain View, Sunnyvale, Santa Clara and i CC 12-2-14 Item #2 Campbell. These factors all argue against major changes to Vallco. Finally, the crowning glory of the Vallco site is the colonnade of trees the marches down both sides of Wolfe, Stevens Creek and along Perimeter Road. They form a narrow park that the City should fiercely protect and extend. Their location in the far east of the City makes these trees and their associated sidewalks especially precious. They should be included on the City's list of Heritage Trees under Cupertino City Ordinance 14.18.070. Despite repeated searches of the City's website I can find no such list. No change in the zoning, use or character of Vallco should take place until the adjacent trees have been placed on the Heritage Tree List. Finally, the Vallco site should not be zoned for housing because its size and location offer a unique opportunity to provide park land and open space to the most underserved area of the City. In contrast to the west side of Cupertino, which has nearly 3 acres of open space per thousand residents, the east side of Cupertino currently has less than 0.3 acres of open space per thousand residents. That amount will be even less once the housing units about to open along Stevens Creek from De Anza to Tantau are opened. The City must preserve, extend and add parks to the east side of Cupertino. East Cupertino is currently bearing the brunt of development without reaping any of the benefits. What happened to the millions of dollars the City made by selling Pruneridge Ave to Apple? Why isn't that money being applied to adding parks and open space to the east side? If the City can't or won't add Parks to the area at the very least it should preserve the recreation opportunities currently available at Vallco. For these and other reasons, I respectfully request that the City Council refrain from adopting the Final EIR tonight. I remain opposed to developing housing on the Vallco site at this time; however, assuming arguendo that housing is to be developed there I am opposed to the proposed density of 35 units per acre. See Proposed General Plan Amendment, Attachment N: Balanced Plan Map, under "Vallco Shopping District Special Area. HCD has identified a density of 20 units per acre as adequate to encourage development of affordable housing. Housing Commission Housing Staff Report of Feb. 12, 2014, page 4. " [T]he City's responsibility is to demonstrate adequate capacity by identifying specific sites, to satisfy the RHNA under existing zoning and land use policy." Ibid, page 2 (emphasis added). Accordingly, the City Council can and must refrain from amending current ordinances to permit densities of more than 20 units per acre at Vallco and throughout the City. Finally, I object to the Final EIR and demand that City Council does not certify it in its current form. I object to the Final EIR because it fails to mitigate the indirect environmental impact upon Cupertino High School of the development of City Center, the Rose Bowl and the Apple Campus. In particular, the City has failed to mitigate the danger to pedestrians, bikers and skateboarders at the intersections of Finch and Stevens Creek and Tantau and Stevens Creek caused by the increased traffic. This indirect impact on the schools facilities must be considered and mitigated. See Chawanakee Unified School District v. County of Madera, Cal. App. 5 Dist, June 21, 2011. In Chawanakee Unified the court held that "impact on traffic is not an impact on school facilities and, as a result, the impact on traffic must be considered in the EIR." Id. Restriping of the road will not be adequate mitigation. The City should look into a variety of possible mechanisms to improve pedestrian safety including but not limited to flashing lights embedded in the cross walk itself, bulb outs on all four corners of the intersection, a pedestrian bridge over the street and hiring crossing guards and even bussing of students. One of the easiest and most effective mitigations at this point would be to defer further construction along the area bounded by Wolfe, Homestead, Tantau and Stevens Creek until after completion of Apple, the Rose Bowl and City Center. Without mitigations for pedestrian and biker safety at these intersections it is only a matter of time before an Apple employee or `Tino student is killed by a car. I therefore request that the City Council refrain from adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project, Exhibit EA -2 until it has been amended to mitigate the indirect impacts to Cupertino High School. Dec 2 in General to 5 neighborhoods Thank Private message 01 CC 12-2-14 Item #2 Andrea Sanders From: E McDaniel '<mcdan333@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 12:47 PM To: City Council; City Clerk Subject:.; Cupertino High School and surrounding neighborhoods have suffered Follow Up Flag:, Follow-up Flag Status: . Flagged Categories: - City Clerk Dear Mayor Wong and Cupertino City Council Members, I am a resident of CUSD and FUHSD attendance areas. I have two current and one future Cupertino High School students, so the issues discussed below are of particular importance to me. Developers have enriched themselves, and hope to continue to do so, at the expense of the quality of life in and around eastern Cupertino. I understand the need for new housing, but your job is to balance the needs, of current residents against future potential residents. As part of, the Housing Element the City is required by the HCD to identify sufficient sites to satisfy its projected Regional Housing Needs Allocation. (RHNA) The City's RHNA for the 2015-2023 time period is 1,064 new housing units. Additionally, State Law allows Cupertino to take credit for a total of 62 units bringing the required number of sites the City must identify:to 1002 new units. See Draft: Resolution No. 14-210, Exhibit EA -1, page 1-6, second paragraph. I urge City Council Members to identify no more than the: minimum number of new RHNA units it is obligated to, rather than the proposed 1843 new units when it submits the Housing Element to HCD. The City Housing Commission has identified at least nine RHNA sites. See Draft Resolution No. 14-210, Exhibit EA -1, page 1-6; which refers to the Draft EIR, Table 3-12, and pp. 3-68 to 3-70. 1 assume for the sake of the following arguments that the 35 acre Vallco site remains identified as a potential RHNA site. The Vallco site is special and requires careful consideration because of its location, size, current use and unique character. Accordingly, I request that the City exclude the Vallco site from the upcoming list of RHNA sites. Vallco is located in the extreme east of Cupertino, bounded approximately by 1-280 S, Wolfe and Stevens Creek. It is undoubtedly the largest parcel of those identified and is home to unique recreation opportunities not available at Stanford Mall, Valley Fair or Santana Row by virtue of its bowling alley, ice skating rink and movie theaters. Furthermore, in contrast to its competitors that aim for the luxury consumer, squarely aimed at the middle class Vallco's Penney's and Sears are also unavailable in Palo Alto, Mountain View, Sunnyvale, Santa Clara and Campbell. These factors all argue against major changes to Vallco. Finally, the crowning glory of the Vallco site is the colonnade of trees the marches down both sides of Wolfe, Stevens Creek and along Perimeter Road. They form a narrow park that the City should fiercely protect and extend. Their location in the far east of the City makes these trees and their associated sidewalks especially precious. They should be included on the City's list of Heritage Trees under Cupertino City Ordinance 14.18.070. Despite repeated searches of the City's website I can find no such list. No change in the zoning, use or character of Vallco should take place until the adjacent trees have been placed on the Heritage Tree List. Finally, the Vallco site should not be zoned for housing because its size and location offer a unique opportunity to provide park land and open space to the most underserved area of the City. In contrast to the west side of Cupertino, which has nearly 3 acres of open space per thousand residents, the east side of Cupertino currently has less than 0.3 acres of open space per thousand residents. That amount will be even less once the housing units about to open along Stevens Creek from -De Anza to Tantau are opened. The City must preserve, extend and add parks to the east side of Cupertino. East Cupertino is currently bearing the brunt of development without reaping any of the benefits. What happened to the millions of dollars the City made by selling Pruneridge Ave to Apple? Why isn't that CC 12-2-14 Item #2 money being applied to adding parks and open space to the east side? If the City can't or won't add Parks to the area at the very least it should preserve the recreation opportunities currently available at Vallco. For these and other reasons, I respectfully request that the City Council refrain from adopting the Final EIR tonight. I remain opposed to developing housing on the Vallco site at this time; however, assuming arguendo that housing is to be developed there I am opposed to the proposed density of 35 units per acre. See Proposed General Plan Amendment, Attachment N: Balanced Plan Map, under "Vallco Shopping District Special Area. HCD has identified a density of 20 units per acre as adequate to encourage development of affordable housing. Housing Commission Housing Staff Report of Feb. 12, 2014, page 4. " [T]he City's responsibility is to demonstrate adequate capacity by identifying specific sites, to satisfy the RHNA under existing zoning and land use policy." Ibid, page 2 (emphasis added). Accordingly, the City Council can and must refrain from amending current ordinances to permit densities of more than 20 units per acre at Vallco and throughout the City. Finally, I object to the Final EIR and demand that City Council does not certify it in its current form. I object to the Final EIR because it fails to mitigate the indirect environmental impact upon Cupertino High School of the development of City Center, the Rose Bowl and the Apple Campus. In particular, the City has failed to mitigate the danger to pedestrians, bikers and skateboarders at the intersections of Finch and Stevens Creek and Tantau and Stevens Creek caused by the increased traffic. This indirect impact on the schools facilities must be considered and mitigated. See Chawanakee Unified School District v. County of Madera, Cal. App. 5 Dist, June 21, 2011. In Chawanakee Unified the court held that "impact on traffic is not an impact on school facilities and, as a result, the impact on traffic must be considered in the EIR." Id. Restriping of the road will not be adequate mitigation. The City should look into a variety of possible mechanisms to improve pedestrian safety including but not limited to flashing lights embedded in the cross walk itself, bulb outs on all four corners of the intersection, a pedestrian bridge over the street and hiring crossing guards and even bussing of students. One of the easiest and most effective mitigations at this point would be to defer further construction along the area bounded by Wolfe, Homestead, Tantau and Stevens Creek until after completion of Apple, the Rose Bowl and City Center. Without mitigations for pedestrian and biker safety at these intersections it is only a matter of time before an Apple employee or `Tino student is killed by a car. I therefore request that the City Council refrain from adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project, Exhibit EA -2 until it has been amended to mitigate the indirect impacts to Cupertino High School. Sincerely, Eric McDaniel Karen B. Guerin From: Randy Shingai <randyshingai@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 11:49 AM To: City Council; City Clerk; dapaul@darcypaul.org; Savita Vaidhyanathan Cc: better.-cupertino-work-group@googlegroups.com Subject: Government Code 65588(a) should trump use of Government Code 65583.2(c)(3)(B) Dear Sirs: This is regarding the draft Housing Element for 2014-2022 that was made available for the December 2, 2014 Regular Council Meeting, and follows up an earlier email. Here is Government Code 65588(a): 65588. (a) Each local government shall review its housing element as frequently as appropriate to evaluate all of the following: (1) The appropriateness of the housing goals, objectives, and policies in contributing to the attainment of the state housing goal. (2) The effectiveness of the housing element in attainment of the community's housing goals and objectives. (3) The progress of the city, county, or city and county in implementation of the housing element. I believe the use of Government Code 65583.2(c)(3)(B) is inconsistent with Government Code 65588(a) because it can be demonstrated that the use of 65583.2(c)(3)(B) produces consistently erroneous results within the City of Cupertino. The City of Cupertino uses Government Code 65583.2(c)(3)(B) to project that high- density housing will produce only lower income housing within the City of Cupertino. Recent and past history has shown that high density housing rarely produces lower income housing.units within the City of Cupertino. While the City is allowed to use Government Code 65583.2(c)(3)(B) to calculate the number of units that can be used to fulfill its share of the regional housing need for lower income housing, the City is not required to use 65583.2(c)(3)(B). Cupertino can instead use a more conventional approach. That is the approach described in 65583.2(c)(3)(A). Here is Government Code 65583.2(c)(3): (3) For the number of units calculated to accommodate its share of the regional housing need for lower income households pursuant to paragraph (2), a city or county shall do either of the following: (A) Provide an analysis demonstrating how the adopted densities accommodate this need. The analysis shall include, but is not limited to, factors such as market demand, financial feasibility, or information based on development project experience within a zone or zones that provide housing for lower income households. (B) The following densities shall be deemed appropriate to accommodate housing for lower income households: (i) For incorporated cities within nonmetropolitan counties and for nonmetropolitan counties that have micropolitan areas: sites allowing at least 15 units per acre. (ii) For unincorporated areas in all nonmetropolitan counties not included in clause (i): sites allowing at least 10 units per acre. (iii) For suburban jurisdictions: sites allowing at least 20 units per acre. (iv) For jurisdictions in metropolitan counties: sites allowing at 1 least 30 units per acre. The City of Cupertino used 65583.2(c)(3)(B) to estimate the number of lower income housing units that would be produced by its inventory of suitable sites for housing in its 2007-20014 Housing Element. According to Table 7.2 in the draft Housing Element Technical Report for 2014-2022, the City achieved 7.3% of its Very Low and 10% of its Low income RHNA goals for the preceding 2007-2014 RHNA period, while at the same time achieving 164% of its Above Moderate income RHNA goals up through 2013. So it's fair to say that there has been a systematic overestimation of Very Low and Low income housing unit production and a systematic underestimation of Above Moderate income housing unit production. I believe the use of 65583.2(c)(3)(B) is responsible for this. In the draft Housing Element Technical Report for 2014-2022, Tables 5.1 and 5-2 inventory a total of 1,389 possible housing units that can be constructed on 6 sites. Every one of these units are projected to have an Affordability Level of Very Low or Low. If these projections are even half correct and these sites are all developed in the 2014-2022 time frame, then the City of Cupertino should easily meet its Very Low and Low income RHNA goals for 2014-2022. However, any reasonable person would doubt that this is going to happen. You have an obligation to follow Government Code 65588(a), because if it can be demonstrated that you were aware of a problem, and that you did nothing to correct it, it might have legal implications. For instance, some housing advocacy group might decide to sue the City for not meeting its RHNA goals for lower income housing. They might argue that the City selected an estimation method that allowed the City to shirk its responsibility to provide lower cost housing. Why is this important? Because if the City knows that there will be a shortfall in the number of lower cost housing, it can start to plan mitigation measures sooner rather than latter. The other reason is that the systematic underestimation of the number of Above Moderate income units produced result in more overall housing units being produced. Please make this part of the public record for the December 2, 2014 Regular Council Meeting. Thank You, Randy Shingai Karen B. Guerin From: Lisa Warren <la-warren@att.net> Sent: Sunday, November 30; 20.14 8:10 PM To: Planning Dept.; City -of Cupertino Planning Dept.; City Council; City Clerk; David Brandt; Aarti Shrivastava; savita4council@gmail.com; Darcy Paul Subject: Please address "Community Benefit' - 'Retail' - vague language City.Council, Planning 'team' and City Attorney, I strongly believe that you should separate the Housing Element issue and the General Plan Amendment early on in your next city council meeting, I do think that December 2nd's CC meeting may be an appropriate time to come to a consensus that something be done about some of the undefined langbage contained in the General Plan that often creates confusion and misguided decision making. However, I truly believe you would be doing a disservice to all of us, including yourselves, if you do not postpone the GPA agenda item and concentrate on the more immediate task of responsibly handling decisions related to the'Housing Element. It has been stated before, by many, that the phrase 'Community Benefits' is. not defined and is negotiated behind the scenes (so to speak)... without community input/control of the outcome. There are similar issues with the'retail' component language in the existing General Plan and related,.documents. These 'catch phrases' both need to be defined appropriately and matched with the intent of a majority of residents. Simply repeating the phrases that exist in the current General Plan will NOT address the problems that continue to occur as projects get approved, and concessions are given to developers, sometimes repeatedly. I like to think that terms like this were introduced into the GP in an -effort to allow for positive negotiations with developers. If they were, then there needs to be some 'clean up' to ensure that residents have significant input on how to define them. If done correctly, you have an opportunity to minimize the wishy washy discussions and. questionable decisions that occur, and,the'change games' that often follow. Example of the 'change game' : If memory serves me.... Main Street was not to include any housing... then the Sr. Housing component was introduced as a sort of 'community benefit'.... then that housing piece was allowed to be substituted with 'lofts' - the baby got thrown out with the bath water. ........ - Main Street has other examples of this:.. changes over the years before ground braking have altered what I recall the original intent was for this site. The originally approved plans changed drastically A lower height, smaller size, Boutique Hotel morphed to 5 story'residerice inn' with kitchenettes. 'Maximum' allowable office square footage (100,000) and height, increased to 260,000 sf = resulting in much larger footprint, increased height and need for more parking !! Retail square footage 'shrunk' and the entire flavor changed. This is a simplistic summary of one project. Your'public' is decidedly unhappy with the entire current situation. In additions, you have a 'changing of the guard' that must be considered. Rushing into decisions, and attempting to successfully deliberate the enormous amount of detail contained in both of these LONG term documents at the same time would be a mistake. I would like to see some cooperation, now that you are getting passionate feedback from a significant number of residents. This cooperation can be demonstrated, partially, by putting off the GPA decision AND by agreeing to distribute proposed housing sites throughout the city, in a equitable way. There are multiple and genuinely good reasons to go forward in this manner. Thank you. Lisa Warren Karen B. Guerin , From: Willey <jonbobw@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 9:45 PM To: Rod Sinks; Gilbert Wong; Barry Chang; Orrin Mahoney; City Council; City Clerk; savita4council@gmail.com; Darcy Paul; Mark Santoro Subject: RE: Cupertino Development Of V611co Attachments: Vallco Developer Plan Comparison 3.pdf Councilmen Wong, Sinks, Vaidhyanathan, Paul, Chang, Santoro, and Mahoney, This is a follow-up e-mail with an updated comparison of development projects in Cupertino. Since my previous e-mail, I have discovered that at the November 10 meeting, Sand Hill actually is wanting 2,000,000 ft2 of office space for Vallco as opposed to what I have heard about which was 1,000,000t2 (I could not attend because I was on business travel). Also, I have discovered that there is already an approved Hyatt Hotel, 148 rooms, which will be behind Vallco on land that I thought was part of Vallco. I question why this is not in the current Cupertino Development Activity Report. And I also learned from the Cupertino Planning department that the permits for the Oaks Shopping Center were allowed to expire and it is now on the Housing List for up to 235 residential units, any coincidence that the permits were allowed to expire? You will find that these are in the updated comparisons. . Attached is my updated Development Comparison and hope you take time to look at these, I have put quite a lot of time in preparing it. And I would like to discuss these comparisons in tomorrow evens meeting. Best Regards, Jon Willey Cupertino Resident since 1997, San Jose resident since birth California licensed engineer From: jonbobw@hotma.il.com To: rsinks@cupertino.org; gwong@cupertino.org; bchang@cupertino.org; omahoney@cupertino.org; citycouncil@cupertino.org; cityclerk@cupertino.org; savita4council@gmail.com; dapaul98@gmail.com; msantoro@cupertino.org Subject: Cupertino Development Of Vallco Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 19:16:14 -0800 Councilmen Wong, Sinks, Vaidhyanathan, Paul, Chang, Santoro, and Mahoney, On the attached document, I have compiled some commercial building and lot size information for comparison to the Proposed Vallco Development and zoning changes being considered. When making decisions on large projects that will have significant impact on Cupertino, I recommend that the buildings and lot sizes be clearly detailed and be within a defined range which are consistent with the city's landscape and residents desires. This is the way residential houses are approved in all cities and has proven to be a good way to facilitate new construction, additions, and significant changes while maintaining fairness and a consistent standard that's acceptable to surrounding people and properties. This should help to alleviate the citizen rage over massive projects that are to maximize Developer's profits with little regard to the impact on the Cupertino landscape and environment. The developments in the comparison are all from the 2014 Cupertino Development Activity Report and represent very recent construction projects within Cupertino. I encourage you to travel to these sites and others and see first hand how the buildings and lot coverage fit or don't fit with the Cupertino landscape and Cupertino Resident desires. And I am happy to receive your thoughts and ideas. Thank you for your consideration, Jon Willey Cupertino Resident since 1997, San Jose resident since birth California licensed engineer Kardn B: Guerin From: Diana Lai <lai_diana@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 11:27 AM To: City Council; City Clerk Subject: I OPPOSE Housing Development at the Vallco Site Re: Demand for Safer.Streets around Cupertino High School and Vallco Dear Mayor Wong and Cupertino City Council Members, I am a resident of CUSD and FUHSD. attendance. areas. As part of the Housing Element the City is required by the HCD to identify sufficient sites to satisfy its projected Regional Housing Needs Allocation. (RHNA) The City's RHNA for the 2015-2023 time period is 1,064 new housing units. Additionally, State Law allows Cupertino to take credit for a total of 62 units bringing the required number of sites the City must identify to 1002 new units. See Draft Resolution No. 14-210, Exhibit EA -1, page I-6, second paragraph. I urge City Council Members to identify no more than the minimum number of new RHNA units it is obligated to, rather than the proposed 1843 new units when it submits the Housing Element to HCD. The City Housing Commission has identified at least nine RHNA sites. See Draft Resolution No. 14-210, Exhibit EA -1, page I- 6; which refers to the Draft EIR, Table 3-12, and pp. 3-68 to 3-70. I assume for the sake of the following arguments that the 35 acre Vallco. site remains identified as a potential RHNA site. The Vallco site is special and requires careful consideration because of its location, size, current use and unique character. Accordingly, I request that the City exclude the Vallco site from the upcoming list of RHNA sites. Vallco is located in the extreme east of Cupertino, bounded approximately by I-280 S, Wolfe and Stevens Creek. It is undoubtedly the largest parcel of those identified and is home to unique recreation opportunities not available at Stanford Mall, Valley Fair or Santana Row by virtue of its bowling alley, ice skating rink and movie theaters. Furthermore, in contrast to its competitors that aim for the luxury consumer, squarely aimed at the middle class Vallco's Penney's and Sears are also unavailable in Palo Alto, Mountain View, Sunnyvale, Santa Clara and Campbell. These factors all argue against major changes to Vallco. Finally, the crowning glory of the Vallco site is the colonnade of trees the marches down both sides of Wolfe, Stevens Creek and along Perimeter Road. They form a narrow park that the City should fiercely protect and extend. Their location in the far east of the City makes these trees and their associated sidewalks especially precious. They should be included on the City's list of Heritage Trees under Cupertino City Ordinance 14:18.070. Despite repeated searches of the City's website I can find no such list. No change in the zoning, use or character of Vallco should take place until the adjacent trees have been placed on the Heritage Tree List. Finally, the Vallco site should not be zoned for housing because its size and location offer a unique opportunity to provide park land and open space to the most underserved area of the City. In contrast to the west side of Cupertino, which has nearly 3 acres of open space per thousand residents, the east side of Cupertino currently has less than 0.3 acres of open space per thousand residents. That amount will be even less once the housing units about to open along Stevens Creek from De Anza to Tantau are opened. The City must preserve, extend and add parks to the east side of Cupertino. East Cupertino is currently bearing the brunt of development without reaping any of the benefits. What happened to the millions of dollars the City made by selling Pruneridge Ave to Apple? Why isn't that money being applied to adding parks and open space to the east side? If the City can't or won't add Parks to the area at the very least it should preserve the recreation opportunities currently available at Vallco. For these and other reasons, I respectfully request that the City Council refrain from adopting the Final EIR tonight. I remain opposed to developing housing on the Vallco site at this time; however, assuming arguendo that housing is to be developed there I am opposed to the proposed density of 35 units per acre. See Proposed General Plan Amendment, Attachment N: Balanced Plan Map, under "Vallco Shopping District Special Area. HCD has identified a density of 20 units per acre as adequate to encourage development of affordable housing. Housing Commission Housing Staff Report of Feb. 12, 2014, page 4. " [T]he City's responsibility is to demonstrate adequate capacity by identifying specific sites, to satisfy the RHNA under existing zoning and land use policy." Ibid, page 2 (emphasis added). Accordingly, the City Council can and must refrain from amending current ordinances to pen -nit densities of more than 20 units per acre at Vallco and throughout the City. Finally, I object to the Final EIR and demand that City Council does not certify it in its current form. I object to the Final EIR because it fails to mitigate the indirect environmental impact upon Cupertino High School of the development of City Center, the Rose Bowl and the Apple Campus. In particular, the City has failed to mitigate the danger to pedestrians, bikers and skateboarders at the intersections of Finch and Stevens Creek and Tantau and Stevens Creek caused by the increased traffic. This indirect impact on the schools facilities must be considered and mitigated. See Chawanakee Unified School District v. County of Madera, Cal. App. 5 Dist, June 21, 2011. In Chawanakee Unified the court held that "impact on traffic is not an impacton school facilities and, as a result, the impact on traffic must be considered in the EIR." Id. Restriping of the road will not be adequate mitigation. The City should look into a variety of possible mechanisms to improve pedestrian safety including but not limited to flashing lights embedded in the cross walk itself, bulb outs on all four corners of the intersection, a pedestrian bridge over the street and hiring crossing guards and even bussing of students. One of the easiest and most effective mitigations at this point would be to defer further construction along the area bounded by Wolfe, Homestead, Tantau and Stevens Creek until after completion of Apple, the Rose Bowl and City Center. Without mitigations for pedestrian and biker safety at these intersections it is only a matter of time before an Apple employee or `Tino student is killed by a car. I therefore request that the City Council refrain from adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project, Exhibit EA -2 until it has been amended to mitigate the indirect impacts to Cupertino High School. Sincerely, Diana Lai and David Or 105 Blake Ave, Santa Clara, CA 95051 Karen B. Guerin From: Tong Zheng <tongzhengtz@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 11:18 AM To: City Council Subject: Demand Safer Streets around Vallco and Cupertino High Dear Mayor Wong and Cupertino City Council Members, I am a resident of CUSD and FUHSD attendance areas. As part.of the Housing Element the City is required by the HCD to identify sufficient sites to satisfy its projected Regional Housing Needs Allocation. (RHNA) The City's RHNA for the 2015-2023 time period is 1,064 new housing units. Additionally, State Law allows Cupertino to take credit for a total of 62 units bringing the required number of sites the City must identify to 1002 new units. See Draft Resolution No. 14-210, Exhibit EA -1, page I-6, second paragraph. I urge City. Council Members to identify no more than the minimum number of new RHNA units it is obligated to, rather than the proposed 1843 new units when it submits the Housing Element to HCD. The City Housing Commission has identified at least nine RHNA sites. See Draft Resolution No. 14-210, Exhibit EA -1, page I-6; which refers to the Draft EIR, Table 3-12, and pp. 3-68 to 3-70. I assume for the sake of the following arguments that the 35 acre Vallco site remains identified as a potential RHNA site. The Vallco site is special and requires careful consideration because of its location, size, current use and unique character. Accordingly, I request that the City exclude the Vallco site from the upcoming list of RHNA sites. Vallco is located in the extreme east of Cupertino, bounded approximately by I-280 S, Wolfe and Stevens Creek. It is undoubtedly the largest parcel of those identified and is home to unique recreation opportunities not available at Stanford Mall, Valley Fair or Santana Row by virtue of its bowling alley, ice skating rink and movie theaters. Furthermore, in contrast toits competitors that aim for the luxury consumer, squarely aimed at the middle class Vallco's Penney's and Sears are also unavailable in Palo Alto, Mountain View, Sunnyvale, Santa Clara and Campbell. These factors all argue against major changes to Vallco. Finally, the crowning glory of the Vallco site is the colonnade of trees the marches down both sides of Wolfe, Stevens Creek and along Perimeter Road. They form a narrow park that the City should fiercely protect and extend. Their location in the far east of the City makes these trees and their associated sidewalks especially precious. They should be included on the City's list of Heritage Trees under Cupertino City Ordinance 14.18.070. Despite repeated searches of the City's website I can find no such list. No change in the zoning, use or character of Vallco should take place until the adjacent trees have been placed on the Heritage Tree List. Finally, the Vallco site should not be zoned for housing because its size and location offer a unique opportunity to provide park land and open space to the most underserved area of the City. In contrast to the west side of Cupertino, which has nearly 3 acres of open space per thousand residents, the east side of Cupertino currently has less than 0.3 acres of open space per thousand residents. That amount will be even less once the housing units about to open along Stevens Creek from De Anza to Tantau are opened. The City must preserve, extend and add parks to the east side of Cupertino. East Cupertino is currently bearing the brunt of development without reaping any of the benefits. What happened to the millions of dollars the City made by selling Pruneridge Ave to Apple? Why isn't that money being applied to adding parks and open space to the east side? If the City can't or won't add Parks to the area at the very least it should preserve the recreation opportunities currently available at Vallco. For these and other reasons, I respectfully request that the City Council refrain from adopting the Final EIR tonight. I remain opposed to developing housing on the Vallco site at this time; however, assuming arguendo that housing is to be developed there I am opposed to the proposed density of 35 units per acre. See Proposed General Plan Amendment, Attachment N: Balanced Plan Map, under "Vallco Shopping District Special Area. HCD has identified a density of 20 units per acre as adequate to encourage development of affordable housing. Housing Commission Housing Staff Report of Feb. 12, 2014, page 4. " [T]he City's responsibility is to demonstrate adequate capacity by identifying specific sites, to satisfy the RHNA under existing zoning and land use policy." Ibid, page 2 (emphasis added). Accordingly, the City Council can and must refrain from amending current ordinances to permit densities of more than 20 units per acre at Vallco and throughout the City. Finally, I object to the Final EIR and demand that City Council does not certify it in its current form. I object to the Final EIR because it fails to mitigate the indirect environmental impact upon Cupertino High School of the development of City Center, the Rose Bowl and the Apple Campus. In particular, the City has failed to mitigate the danger to pedestrians, bikers and skateboarders at the intersections of Finch and Stevens Creek and Tantau and Stevens Creek caused by the increased traffic. This indirect impact on the schools facilities must be considered and mitigated. See Chawanakee Unified School District v. County of Madera, Cal. App. 5 Dist, June 21, 2011. In Chawanakee Unified the court held that "impact on traffic is not an impact on school facilities and, as a result, the impact on traffic must be considered in the EIR." Id. Re -striping of the road will not be adequate mitigation. The City should look into a variety of possible mechanisms to improve pedestrian safety including but not limited to flashing lights embedded in the cross walk itself, bulb outs on all four corners of the intersection, a pedestrian bridge over the street and hiring crossing guards and even busing of students. One of the easiest and most effective mitigation at this point would be to defer further construction along the area bounded by Wolfe, Homestead, Tantau and Stevens Creek until after completion of Apple, the Rose Bowl and City Center. Without mitigation for pedestrian and biker safety at these intersections it is only a matter of time before an Apple employee or `Tiro student is killed by a car. I therefore request that the City Council refrain from adopting the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Project, Exhibit EA -2 until it has been amended to mitigate the indirect impacts to Cupertino High School. Regards, Tong Karen B. Guerin From: Lisa Warren <la-warren@att.net> . Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 12:12 AM To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept.; Planning Dept.; City Clerk; City Council; savita4council@gmail.com; Darcy Paul Subject: Fw: Recommended Housing Element Sites Identified as requested Planning, City Council, City Manager - I was one of the attendees at the November 20, 2014 GPA/HEU Community Workshop. During the course of the evening, the planned 'agenda' was altered as member of the community were anxious for a chance to ask questions and share thoughts as an entire group as opposed to multiple guided round table discussions. As a result, the.'mapping exercise' that was planned by the city was not completed. I saw some value in having attendees give the input that this excersise would have supplied, so after the meeting, I suggested to at least four different city employees, including the City Manager and Asst. Manager, that an email be sent to everyone that was sent the notification email about the Nov 20 workshop AND any new email addresses that were collected on the sign -in sheet that evening. The email would contain an attachment with the map image and a request that people identify sites/unit numbers at home and send them in to the city. I thought the feedback on that suggestion was positive, but I did not ever receive such an email, and am fairly certain one did not get sent out. I was disappointed That being said, I want to share with you a list that was the result of a 'mapping session' with myself and a few residents. This list is in no particular order and the total of all highest unit numbers suggested is far larger than the desired total of units to be included in the Housing Element. IF the . high end of the ranges is used sites with ranges, then other sites should be removed. The goal is to end up with far LESS than the 1400 unit number that Staff keeps mentioning. We see no need for that large of a 'buffer'. For example, IF Hamptons and Oaks are 'maxed', then Glenbrook, Villages and Foothill McClellan could be removed completely.- resulting in 1171 total on 6 sites: That would be enough !! • Hamptons 500-660 • BarrySwenson 11 • Granite Rock 120 • Marina Plaza 180 • Villages 62 • Glenbrook 93-228 • The Oaks 180-200 • Foothill @ McClellan 27 or more Homestead Lanes was also considered as an option. I hope that other such lists were created by residents. Thank you, Lisa Warren Cupertino - Let's Move Forward Don't be intimidated by people who fear change What's Going On? • A group of bullies are trying to intimidate you by sending you emails threatening referendum or recall, being noisy, holding rallies, making signs, and stirring up people with stories that they made up but that are patently untrue • They do that because they are afraid of change. It has nothing to do with the issues they invent to try to scare you • They did the same thing while I was on the Council against the Library, Senior Center, Teen Center, Community Hatt, Cypress Hotel, Blackberry Farm, Peet's Coffee, Panera, the Vallco theatres, and any thing else we did • They were wrong then and they're wrong now Vote for the General Plan Amendment • We need it to renovate Vallco to make it something to be proud of again, and to provide some diversity in tax revenues • We need housing near Apple so that the 12,000 new employees there won't create a traffic disaster on our streets and completely destroy 1280 with congestion • Our schools need the millions of dollars of funding that these changes will bring Typical Lies from the Bullies • From yesterday's anonymous bully email spam: Thanks for Representing the 58,000 residents of Cupertino who elected you to use your judgment And not just 200 frightened people who try to scare you Community Recommended Housing Element Sites . II V Staff Report Site Name Alternative Community Units per Priority No. 342 du existing A Proposal location 3. Hamptons 65 du/ac 90 du/ac 609 342 du existing 344 du add @ 609 du add @ P(Res — 70) 85% 85% 404 du add @ 100% 5. Bang Swenson 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 11 P(CG, Res) 11 du @ 85% 11 du @ 85% j 13 du @ 100% 13 du @ 100% No change 6. Glenbrooks Apts 93 du add @ 85% 93 du add @ 85% 93 517 du existing 109 du add @ 109 du add @ R3(10-20) 100% 100% No chane No change 11. Homestead 35 du/ac 25 du/ac 108 Lanes+ Adj. 0 108 du @ 85% P(CG)/P Rec,Ent No chane du @ 100% 12. Summerwinds/ 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 96 Granite Rock/ 96 du @ 85% 96 du @ 85% Jack in the Box 114 du @ 100% 114 du @ 100% P(CG, Res 5-15) PCG, Res PCG, Res 14. Villages 20 du/ac* * * 20 du/ac* * * 62 468 du existing 62 du @ 85% 62 du @ 85% R3 74 du @ 100% 74 du @ 100% No chane No change 16. Foothill Market 25 du/ac 25 du/ac 27 @ McClellan 27 du @ 85% 27 du @ 85% P(CG) 32 du @ 100% 32 du @ 100% Same as Alt C Same as Alt C 17. Bateh Bros. 15 du/ac* 15 du/ac* 15 P(CG) 0 du 0 du No chane No change Vivi's location 10 Total: 1031 Required: 19002 �J O» FV N 5 D LDe bs, �e- FFEMONTUNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRCT LC HNROLLM ENTAND CAPACITY 2013-14 2013-14 HNROLLM HNTAND CAPACITY DATA Ste Rojected Enr. ProjectedOver/ Max Enr. Capadty Under Cupertino High School 2065 2086 1794 292 Fremont High School 2020 2040 1931 109 Homestead High School 2389 2413 2220 193 Lynbrook High School 1848 1866 1819 48 Monta Vista High School 2335 2358 2300 58 Dist. Total 10657 10764 1 10064 700 M UL n YEAR ENROLLM HNT PRO.ECTI ONS Ste 2013-14 2014-15 2017-18 2020-21 Fremont High School 2020 2024 2336 2752 Homestead High School 2389 2441 2553 2745 Morita Vista High School 2335 2369 2495 2408 Cupertino High School 2065 2170 2471 2790 Lynbrook High School 1848 1882 1773 1639 Community Day School 8 8 8 8 Non Public School 16 16 16 16 District Total 10681 10910 11652 12358 � -f if r4f I.I t FFEM ONT UNION HIGH SC HOOL DI SIRI CT M ULFl YEAR ENFZOLLM ENT P" 2013-14 On F U HS:D School and Category: 2012 2013 1 Yr change 2014 1 Yr change Tot. change 2017 3 y change Tot. change 2020 3yr change Tot. change Fremont Fbsident Population 2,033 2,037 4 2,039 2 6 .2,351 312 318 2,767 416 734 Potential Net Adjustment" -12 -17 -5 -15 2 -3 -15 0 -3 -15 0 -3 Fremont Potential Attendance 2,021 2,020 -1 2,024 4 3 2,336 312 315 2,752 416 731 Homestead Fbsident Population 2,356 12,385 1 29 12,433 48 77 2,545 1 112 1 189 1 2,737 1 192 381 Potential Net Adjustment 11 1 4 1 -7 8 4 -3 8 0 -3 8 1 0 -3 Homestead Potential Attendance 2,367 1 2,389 1 22 2,441 52 74 2,553 112 186 2,745 1 192 378 Monta Vista Fbsident Population 2,441 2,353 -88 2,379 26 -62 2,505 1 126 1 64 1 2,418 1 -87 -23 Potential Net Adjustment -21 1 -18 3 -10 8 11 -10 1 0 11 -10 0 11 MontaMsta Potential Attendance 2,420 2,335 -85 2,369 34 -51 2,495 1 126 75 2,408 -87 -12 Qipertino Fbsident Population 1,943 2,025 82 2,136 111 193 2,437 301 494 2,756 319 813 Potential Net Adjustment 34 40 6 34 -6 0 34 0 0 34 1 0 0 CLpertino Potential Attendance 1,977 2,065 88 2,170 105 193 2,471 301 494 2,790 319 1 813 Lynbrook Pesident Population 1,741 1,768 27 1,802 34 61 1,708 -94 -33 1,574 -134 -167 Potential Net Adjustment 94 80 -14 80 0 -14 65 -15 -29 65 0 -29 Lynbrook Potential Attendance 1,835 1,848 13 1,882 34 47 1,773 -109 -62 1,639 -134 -196 Community Attendance 8 8 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 1 0 NPSAttendance 19 16 -3 16 0 -3 16 0 -3 16 0 1 -3 Dist. Pesident Population 10,514110,5681 54 110,7891 221 1 275 111,5461 757 1 1,032 112,2521 706 1,738 Dist. Projected Net Adjustment 133 1 113 1 -20 1 121 1 8 1 -12 1 106 1 -15 1 -27 1 106 1 0 -27 Dist. Potential Enrollment 10,647110,6811 34 110,9101 229 1 263 111,6521 742 1 1,005 112,3581 706 1,711 (7» FV N S.D c� ebsi p.�a,9; � -� : naso � c��k-p► � �l CFUHSD) FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS AND CAPACITY ESTIMATES FREMONT 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 FHS Enrollment 1,992 2,103 2,214 2,321 2,429 2,536 FHS Capcity 2,190 2,190 2,190 2,190 2,190 2,190 Over/Under Capacity -198 -87 24 131 239 346 HOMESTEAD 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 HHS Enrollment 2,446 2,487 2,528 2,579 2,630 2,681 HHS Capcity 2,436 2,436 2,436 2,436 2,436 2,436 Over/Under Capacity 10 51 92 143 194 245 MONTA VISTA 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 MHS Enrollment 2,395 2,470 2,544 2,519 2,493 2,468 MHS Capcity 2,459 2,459 2,459 2,459 2,459 2,_459 Over/Under Capacity -64 1 11 1 85 1 60 1 34 1 9 CUPERTINO 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 20-21 CHS Enrollment 2,281 2,393 2,505 2,591 2,677 ,763 72,210 CHS Capcity 2,210 2,210 2,210 2,210 2,210 Over/Under Capacity 71 183 295 381 467 553 LYNBROOK 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 LHS Enrollment 1,809 1,786 1,762 1,729 1,695 1,662 LHS Capcity 1,885 1,885 1,885 1,885 1,885 1,885 Over/Under Capacity 1 -76 1 -100 1 -123 1 -156 1 -190 1 -223 Capacity totasl are estimates and include all current construction projects. A formal capacity study is done each year and approved by the Board of Trustees. r — — — — -1 r — — — — -- Square Homestead - _ r — — HOMESTEAD RD Franco Shopping / Park Center _ .. 4 _.. u C .. - 3 J Future I X I arI I Apple 2 W m I L J Campus J Z I 3 Apple PRUNER\DGE I g Inc. Garden Gate ® I Study Areas -- - ..,.- c=.... Cupertino Inn O and Goodyear Tire > 2O City Center Q m Z N 43 PG&E Z �.- J Q "'- w UjI 4O Mirapath F of - Q Portal ` 6 I OS Cupertino Village LU Park The Oaks CuSpertino Z I O Vallco Shopping District Shopping orts Crossroads Area O7 , , p�p Stevens Creek Center I Market Office Center • Place I Cupertino Crossroads STEVENS CREEK BLVD L Center ui w 2 0 3 De Anza .!'�--- College i r . V .0 ..,:.r. r City Wilson , .x. t, Hail .. Park CrePekaklda . ' r 1 City R—,,-,, Freeway Park . Gvic CiIY P-6 Mejnr Road Wates • R—,1 �.iniudiny Cines. Minor Road ® Oft— O SIud7 Area Sn,dy rca A • Edwaoon ® Rounda.v ay v( C'LIP ERTIN0 FM general plan amendment ) 0 800 1600 2400 Feet Corridor and Study Areas Also, the meetings related to adding more residential units or rezoning for more housing, need to have representatives from school, traffic and other important infrastructures. Sometimes, there is no accountability with the survey reports. It's the residents who send kids to school or drive day -in and day -out in these roads who face the brunt of it. Surveys and reports are just estimates and there's always an error margin to it. We hereby urge you to vote NO to rezoning for sites in Cupertino for conformance with General Plan and Housing Element 1 -/ Share Ns petition Petitioning Cupertino City Council members with 1.55 sURiers Say No to re -zoning the �145 nee0ed commercial sites in Cupertino Add a personal message joptiorialj ' Cupertino Residents Cupertino City Council members: Clear Cupertino City Council members, ` "" Say NO to re -zoning the... We DO NOT agree with the proposal of rezoning of sites for conformance with f � General Pian and Housing Element. All the proposed sites are along Stevens Post ' Facebook Creek Blvd and Cie Anza Blvd. f Invite friends y Twitter W 'Email Cupertino's main arteries, Stevens Creek Blvd and De Anza Blvd, are already congested with heavy traffic. Parking near the Cupertino City Center has become worse because of the high density housing available in the area, especially along Stevens Creek Blvd between Wolfe and De Anza Sponsor an ad to show this >petition >to more Blvd. There's no parking available for people coming to the library. potential supporters` Rodrigues Ave has become very crowded after recent lane restructuring. Promote this petition Though there are bike lanes on either sides of Rodrigues Ave, it is really unsafe for kids biking on this road, as cars are parked along on both sides of the road making it very narrow. Please note that this is the route that most of the middle school and high school kids go to and from the library. So, adding more residential units along these main roads will complicate the current Cupertino road scenario. We still do not know the impact of the projects, like Rose Bowl, Main Street and Apple Spaceship, that are still in progress. it is definitely not going to get any better. So, before we rezone more sites to include housing elements, we need to make sure we understand the full depth of impact on traffic, school, emergency response, parks and recreation, safety of kids, and of course, pollution with too many vehicles standing bumper to bumper for extended time. Also, the meetings related to adding more residential units or rezoning for more housing, need to have representatives from school, traffic and other important infrastructures. Sometimes, there is no accountability with the survey reports. It's the residents who send kids to school or drive day -in and day -out in these roads who face the brunt of it. Surveys and reports are just estimates and there's always an error margin to it. We hereby urge you to vote NO to rezoning for sites in Cupertino for conformance with General Plan and Housing Element Cupertino Residents Recipient: getter: Greetings, Say NO to re -zoning the commercial sites in Cupertino Signatures Name Location Date Priya T Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 radha pasari Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Janet Yiu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Sushma Shirish Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Dorice Hu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Raj Murali Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Ahmed Tantawy Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Elena Shao Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Shanthi Ranganathan San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Xiaowen Wang • trj • , CA, United States 2014-11-05 Sunil Satnur Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Huaying Cheng Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 mehrnaz Khosravi Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 jennifer guo San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Par Pandit Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Hong Hui Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Henry Choi Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 sonal lele Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Lisa Pang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Pratima Gogineni Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Michelle Wang San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Xinhua Wang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Howen Chen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Fang Zhu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 yilei li Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Aditi Ranadive Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Prabal Bhattacharya Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Brindha Hariharane Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Donna tsai Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Poornima Seshadri Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Name 1Locat�on Date Xiao Shi _ ......_..._.. _ .............. Cupertino, CA, United'States ........................ _.... ..... ...... I.."...................................................................... 2014-11.-05 _:._.__.... ,._..._..:_ _..... ..........._... __ anjna-kaulcuper-tino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Hongjuan Zhao. Cupertino, CA,- United States 2014-11=05 Amisha Shah Cupertino, CA, United States 2014=11-05 Ping zhou Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05: Shenglin Yang San Jose, CA, United States .................:....._.......... 20.1-4.-11--05 _.............................................. I................ ................................. ..._................_._........._....._.............._............._....__.........._.................._........._ Meeta Patel... Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 YONG.ZHAO SAN JOS E,.CA,'United States. 20.14-11-05.. Vidya Mahesh cupertino, CA, United. States 2014-11-05 , Shyamla Ganapathy Cupertino, CA, 'United States 201:4-11-05. yuanyuan sun - - cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Ram. Natarajan , Cupertino, CA,`United States 2014-11-05. Zhuojian Han Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Jinming. Gu Cupertino;. CA, United-States 2014-11-05 _ Sharada Bose Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Shilpa Vir ......... .. ..........................:_ Cupertino,CA, United States :._...... ................ ........._ _.........._.._................................................. 2014-11-05 __.......................... . ...................._........ parul shah cupertino, CA, United .States 2014-11-05 Priya Krishnakumar Cupertino, CA; United States 2014-1:1=05- D S 1 - Sunnyvale, CAS United States 2014-11-05 . Raji Barani ............................... _.................... Cupertino,-CA; United States _...... _... .... ....................... .._........... .............................................. 2014=11-05 ... .................................. ............... ... . ........... .._ Niniva Ray Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 . Meenakshi Sambasivam cupertino, CA,: United States - .2014-11-05 - - Nathan Hu CUperitno, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Charlotte Xia . Cupertino,. CA, '-United States 201;4-1:1-05 . Ashish Singh Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 .. Nithya Ramamoorthy cupertino, CA, United States 2014=11-05. Caroline Salazar Santa Clara, CA, United States ........_......... .......... ...................._.......... ....... ........_ ...._.. 2014-11-05 . _........._._._ ........._......._ ................._............ Peiling .Yao . _ _ _.._ Cupertino, CA United States ....... _............... ..I............................ 2014-,11-05 Anuradha Venataraman Cupertino, CA, United States , 2014-11-05 ......................................_ ...... _.................................._".............................................__........................._.........................._.._..................._.__......... Shantanu Patwardhan .Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Srini Krishnamurthy Cupertino, CA, United States : 2014-11=05. Shirish .Seetharam Cupertino, CA, 'United State's_ -2014-11-05 Name Location Date Ananta Karanam Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Prabha Sriram cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Brooke Ezzat Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Ganesan Sriram Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Carrie Reichenberger Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Saravanakumar tiruthani Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 sumathi chari CUPERTINO, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Masahito Kagawa CUPERTINO, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Edita Tejnil Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Akemi Iwatsubo Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 aruna binuraj Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Anju Bhagavan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Ayoub Hashemi Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Rakesh Shah Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Scott Ding Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Vidya Raman Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Ruth Littmann Ashkenazi Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Hari Narayanan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 I -Jung Poon Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Fozia Rana Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Suresh Muppala Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Jayashree Natarajan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Tervie Leung Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Vikas Sachan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Jyoti sri cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Patricia Coppe Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Swapna Yarlagadda Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Sujatha Narayanan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Kalpendu Pasad Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Eric Yang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Krithika Srinivasan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Qing Lu San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-05 ,Name; Location Date yu ying cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 . . Ashok Kumar. , Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Mike Rohrs Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Abu Wawda. Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Kamal Kant - Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Jeffrey Lowe. Cupertino,,-CA, United States 2014-11-05 Seema. Gupta Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-1.1-05 Dhaya-Seshasayee Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11--05, Myoung Kang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05:. . Suchitra Manickam Sunnyvale, CA, .United States 2014-11-05 Chunhua.Li Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Nan Jiang San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Yan Chen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Mony Lorach Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05, Feng Ye : _,.,.............................. Cupertino, CA, United States .................................. .......................... ..........:.... .... 2014-11-05 . ... ....... _........................................... Bill Connor Cupertino, CA, United States ..... ...... ........................... 2014-11-05 Xianzhi Li Cupertino', CA, United. States 2014-11-05. Tammy. Mongelli Sunnyvale,�C& United States 2014-11-05 Ong yang: Santa ,Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-05. Sujuan Cai, San.Jose, CA, United.States -2014-11-05_, Pui chen ; - _............................... ............ ................. Cupertino, CA, United States ............. ......... ..........._................. .. ...... I—— ........... .2014-1.1-05: . _ .:._........................................ Kumar Subramani Cupertino, CA, _United States 2014-11-05 Daniel Hsiao Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Kuimeuy Wang _.... ..._.............................................................................................I..'..... Cupertino, CA, United. States ... _._. _._. _. ..............__.................. 2014-11-05 .......................... ...................... ......... .... sonali Padgaonkar cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Shubha Batni , Cupertino,. CA, United States . 2014=11-05 Judy Lin Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-05 David Reichenberger Cupertino, CA, United States 201.4-11-05 Sriram Natarajan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 ying yan Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Sarat Khilnani . ..................._.......................... .._.........._ Cupertino, CA, United States ...... _, ., ...................... . _........ ._ ... _.......... .. 2014-11-05 .... Cristina -Dalle Ore Cupertino, CA, United States. ....... ..:........._.......... 2014.-11-05 Name Location Date Dongming Yao Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Jatin Patel Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Manisha Puranik Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Linda Zhang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 H. Wen cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 vrinda bhole Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Gowthaman Ranganathan CUPERTINO, CA, United States 2014-11-05 michelle hu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Suhas Patil Cupertini, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Greg S. Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Keerthy Mahesh cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Wenfei Gong Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Masako Watanabe United States 2014-11-05 Nancy Roberts Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Yanping zhao Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Prasad Narayana Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Yitsen Tu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Linda Wyckoff Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 nirupama chiplunakar sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Jacqueline Cohen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Saritha Guntumadugu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 shu Yan San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Veronica Law Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 vidya g santa clara, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Leonid Shtilman Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Xiaoyan Zhang Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Martina Herhusky Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Aparna Risbud Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Yuet Poon Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Mythili Senthilkumar Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Viji Ilango Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 chen Ben Asher Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 :Name`: Locatron ` Date Kimber graham Santa Clara, CA; United, States 2014-11-05 Dave Hunt: , , .......... ............. _ :...... ............_..........................___......................... Cuperitno, CA,. United. States ___................ ............ ....... 2014-11-05 ............... Ming Lim Cupertino, CA,'United States ._....._........... ....................... 2014-11-05 Vipul Shroff Cupertino, CA, United States2014=1`.1=05 . Revathy Narasimhan Cupertino, CA, United, States 2014-11-05 Vishakha Stein _._........... ........ ..................._..._ Cupertino, CA,-United States ......................:.:...... ........................................ _..................................................... 2014-11-05. Joel Adam cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Candice Lucado; Cupertino, CA,. United States 2014-11.-05 Christine jacobs Cupertino; CA., United States ... ; 2014-1.1-05 Natalya. Kurilskaya Sunnyvale, CA, United States 201.4.-11-05 Greg Young Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Shanshan .Liu:: Cupertino, CA, United States_ 2014-11-0,5. Ishita Acharya Saratoga, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Swathi Rangarajan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05.. ANANDARUP BAGCHI Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Binbin_Tan Cupertino,, CA, United States. 2014-11-05. Cathy Lin Mountain View, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Aidong.Chen , Cupertino, CA, Unite&States . 2014-11.-05 . Rui xu . Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11705. Li Chen Cupertino,, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Janne Zhong.Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 giao sang � San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-05 : Sharon Huang - Sunnyvale, CA; United States 2014-11-05 Mandar Kulkarni . United States. 2014-11-05 Vishwas Nagaraja SAN JOSE, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Xuemei Lou Cupertino,-CA; United States 2014-11-05. .. Jessica Solchenberger Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 zana wil;kie Santa Clara,. CA, United States 2014-111-05.. Sampath Gomatam Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Bindeeya Desai . Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 hongzhuan zhang . SarrJose; CA, United States 2014-11-05 Mihir Gangar Palo.Alto; CA,,.United States. -2014-1.1-05 Name Location Date Yi Xu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Hongliang Chang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Satya Vempati Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Akilandeswari Vaidhyanathan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Bei Yao Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 qiang liu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 YANG -MIN CHEN Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Arnita PROFFITT CUPERTINO, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Lakshmi Balakrishnan Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Kanchan Lakkapragada Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Qin Pan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Mozhgan Novbakhtian Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Anu Yagati Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Yin zhang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Janice Leier Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Petr Vandrovec Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Melte Christensen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Kelwin Tamtoro Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-11-05 randall shingai san jose, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Meera Chawla Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Ramesh Rao Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Eddie Chen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Laurie Robell Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Dulce Yang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Tianpei Zhang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Victoria Lau Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Pratibha Mehta Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Neeraja Nambula Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Ximing Yang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Ruth Stevens Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Shuairen Liu CUpertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Cathy Mack Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Name; Loca#ian Date Yan Cheng Cupertino, CA, United States _..........................__ __............... :_..............._ ............__...... . I � - .. a 2014-11-05 .... .. ....._......................... __........_..............._...._... Leslie Kornblum _ _. Saratoga, CA, United States ...... 2014-1.1-05 . Wayne Xin Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11705 Sarah. Yu. Cupertino,. CA, United_States_ 2014-11-05. cathy Campo Cupertino, CA, United'States 2014-11-05 Maureen Pavy Cupertino, CA, .United States 2014-11-05 Christy Huang san jose, CA, United States 2014-11-05. yan.feng. - cupertino,. CA,, United.:States. 20.14-1,1-05.. . henry liang Sunnyvale; CA, United States,.: __...... ._......._......._.........._............ .. ___......._..__ .... - .... 2014-11-05 __......_................_.............._.. Xiuzhen gao. . .... Cupertino,. CA,, United States .... ................. ..... .,............................. 2014=11-05 - Richard wu ..... Cupertino, CA, United States ......: __ ,_:....... _.... _:....:...... .................._................._....... 2014-11-05 _......... .___...._..........__ _: _ .... Li Cao _ Cupertino, CA, United States .__.... _ _ ..................... . 2014-11-05 Ruchita.Singhal. Cupertino; CA, United States 2014-11-05 Krishna Subramanian Saratoga; CA, .United States 201.4.-11-05 . Kay Hsu San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Rajasree Nair-, San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Michael Lau Cupertino,' CA, United States 2014-11-05 William Shipman. . Cupertinoi, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Anjini Saharia Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-05 Amanda Huang Cupertino, CA,: United States 2014-11-05 Prabha Krishnaswami Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11705 Xiang Yang. . ...:.....:............_,......... ..............._........... ............. Cupertino, CA, United States - ....................._.... ....... ...............:.......................,............. _._._._:.................._ 2014-11-05 _ Maamar. Zoubeidi Cupertino, CA, United: States ...............I., ........ ................ ....... 2014-11-05 Kanchan. Patalay Cupertino, CA, United. States. 2014-11-05, Janice Goh .. Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Zhi Chen Cupertino,, CA; United, States 2014=11-06 Sarabjeet Singh Cupertino; CA,-United.States 2014-11;-06 Vaitheesh. Kolady Cupertino, CA, United States, 2014-1:1-06, Henry Kirtland Cupertino,. CA, United. States 2014-11-06 Carrie O'Leary Cuperti.no,: CA, United. States 2014-11-06 Anupama Bandi Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Barbara Lancon" Cupertino,,CA, United::States. 20:14-:11-06 Name Location Date Madhumita Bhattacharya Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Dennis Yen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Danny Blitz Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Raju Angani Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Dino COPPE CUPERTINO, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Xue Jin cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Kevin Cheong Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Mina Benchorin Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Elangovan Punniakoti cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Mary Christeena cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Jill Gutierrez Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Priya Ananthanarayanan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Jialin Song cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Kaushal Varshney Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Clement Nappoly Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Huiyu Feng Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Randy Tung sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Alexis Vernon Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Susan White San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Nimit Thaker Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Yun Peng San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Ashwin Krishnan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Richa Narang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Agnes Pommier Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Raju Ayyaswamy san jose, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Ashwini Gaur Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Prasanna Venkatesh Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Yurong Shi San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Ping GAO Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 ning shen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Aparna Nappoly Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Kristen Verdi Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 ;Name:; Locaiion Da#e Jennifer Fu. • Cupertino,=CA, United States 2014-11-06 Janey- Lien Cupertino, CA,..United States 2014-11-06 Jacquelin Choi Cupertino,.CA,:United-States 2014-11-06 Umesh- Mahindra- .Cupertino; CA, United: States 2014-11-06 Yue wang Cupertino, CA, United. States 2014-11-06 Ravi Narula Cupertino;;CA,;United States 2014-11-06-. ; Stephen- Leung Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 christine Israel san jose,. CA, United, States 2014-1-1--06 , L Zhang Cupertino, CA,.United States 2014-11-06 . Yongming Zhang Cupertino; CA, UnitedStates- 2014-11-06- Jinyong Yuan .Cupertino, CA, United.States 2014-11-06 ZHENG LIU -. ' CUP_ERTINO, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Liyan zhao San Jose, .CA, United States 2014-11-06 Lisa Zeng. Cupertino„ CA,_ United: States . 20.14-.11-06 .. Jun Luo San,Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-06 david_ Wang Saratoga; : CA, .. United, States_ 2014-11-06.. Kathy Mcnulty, Cupertino, CA,:.United States 2014-11-06 Sunjay Mohan Cupertino, CA, United States _._. 2014-11-06 Yunging.Shi., Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Yao-tying. Huang. San. Jose, CA,. United. States. 2014-11-06:, wendy lu - , - Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-1.1-06 steve tan San Jose,; CA,- United States - 20147-11-06 •; ; , Xiaojie ,Dong- ; Santa Clara, CA, ,United States 2014-11-06 Irfan- Presswala- Cupertino-,,CA, United States 2014-11-06- jays kothule .. ,• - - Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Amy huang, • tri ' CA; United- States - 2014-11-06 - bin Li .:: - San, Jose, CA, . United; States 2014-11-06 ................................... _ Meichih Chen, _______ ..._......._......_....._........................................................................................_. jt�,' CA, -United-. States __............__ _.. .._.. ......._.......... . 2014-11-06 Manju Datta : ' ...._....._ _ _._._._ ... Cupertino; CA,,United. States _ :.....__............ ... ....................... _..... ............ ....... ..... _................................................. 2014-11-06 Jin-Ho Tan Palo-Alto,-,CA, United States, ....... .... .......... 2014-11-06 WeiWei Liu San Jose;-CA, United States 2014=11-06 Lesley_ Reid, LosAltos, .CA,..United.States. 2014-11-.06 Name '; '' Location Date jing hu Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Daxin Wang 'San Jose; CA, United States 2014-11=06 Shunying-Zhang ___ . ...... 11 _................. ...................._............_ • irk • ; CA, United States ....................._......._..._.._..............__ ........._....._......... 2014-11-06 ........ ........ I.... ..._............. ....... Meeta-Upadhyay Cupertino,-CA,-United States '2014-11-06 YuFei Cupertino sutapa b ............... ...... ............ _...... ...:,_..... ..................... Cupertino, CA, United States .......... _.. _. _... 2014-11-06 Eunice Cheng - Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Yuxiang zeng Saratoga, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Ring He :.......::...................._.... San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Helen liu ,............... ._............. ......... .......... ............ ......................... .:................................ Cupertino,' CA, United States ............ .........._.................................... 2014-11--06 Joan O ..................... ...:..:....... _....................._ Cupertino, CA, United States ........._........................__............:........................ 2014-11-06 ' ............... joanne chuff ...... .......................... _:............ Cupertino, CA, United States .............__.:,.............. 2014-11-06 Hao Wang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 ken chui Cupertino, CA United States 2014-11-06 Jennifer Hu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 --Jun Ma' Cupertino, CA, -United States -2014-11=06 Xiaowei Yee San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Redwood City,_CA,. United-States - _2014-11-06 Ching Wong Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Natasha Garg — ,.. -Cupertino, CA, United States -2014-11-06 _ . ....... _ _ .. _._................. Limin Song .............. ._........__._.....__............_...........__........._.... ......... _ ....... Cupertino, CA, United States I.............. ........_. _ ....... ..._ ..... 2014-11-06 Jaclyn Chiew Cupertino, CA; United States 2014=11-06 Bo Pang Cupertino, CA, United States .......... 2014-11-06 ........_ _......... ......................._...._.................._... -Wencheng-Su ......... ...... ....._...... _.............._........................I........._ _ _................... 'Cupertino; CA, United States I _.........._....._ _ ......... 2014-11--06 Susan cheah Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Grace chuang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Xun Xu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Justin Vo ' Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 __ .- ..._ .. ..._.... ............ ......................_......,............:........__._ Staci Chen ....... ........ __ _..... _ _ ..... Cupertino, CA, United States _ ... _..._ 2014-11-06 . Wenhua Yang.. Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 _ .... .... .............................................. ......... .. Doreen Wang'' .................... ........_............................ - ... _. _ . _............. - ._.. _ .... san jose, CA, United States .- .......... ....... _. . 2014-11-06 Minyu Cheng Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Maggie Ngan Cupertino; CA, United States 2014-11-06 ging zhang. P -' " ," CA;United States 2014-11-06 Wei Yue .. , -Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-11-06 William Shen - Cupertino, CA, United. States 2014-11-06 . Hsiaowen Wang San-Jose, CA, United States 2014-11=06. Geli Zhao..: Cupertino, -CA,, States 2014711-06. Jenny Meng' ,:San Jose, CA, United States . 2014-11-06 Yu. Qing,zhang_; Cupertino,. CA;_ United.. States_ 2014-11-06 . Qi Qiu .. Cupertino, CA, United. States 2014-11-06 Shuging Liu Sunnyvale, CA; United States 2014-11-06 Helen shen Cupertino, CA, Unite6States 2014-11-06 . Sailaja Tubati.-' : ' . : Cupertino,: CA,. United, States- 2014-11-06. zheng zhang Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-11-06 . Lizhen, Zheng " Santa Clara, CA,.' United:.States 2014-11-06 Lu-An Ko - -Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014'11-06,: Jiawen•Zhao- tri CA,' Uhitedr States 2014-11-06„ Jenny cui San Jose; CA, United States 2014-11-06 Xiaoxin Wu• °t ' , CA; ' United-States- 2014-11-06-- Zhibiao Zhao Cupertino; CA; United States 2014-11-06 Shaochin'Hu Cupertino, CA,'United States 2014-11-06 Jenny Zhuo .......__........ ..._.............................................................. Sunnyvale, CA, United States ................................................ ........................ ...._........................ 2014-11-06 ............... ............ :.... ............ ............ Jonathan-Siu Cupertino,, C& United-States 2014-11-06- Susan Lee Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Huazhi-wang Cupertino, CA, United-States 2014=11-06 Han Mengzi = Santa clara, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Jiun Goh Cupertino, CA, United States . 2014-.11-06 Tracy Lin - , -Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Albert'-Huang , Cupertino,; CA,: United..States... 2014-11-0.6_. Xiangdc`ng QiuCupertino, CA, United States ....... ............. .... .... ....... ._ .. 2014-11-06 _... _ Jean Jean Huang ........ Cupertino,'CA, United States . ....... __ ... ... ... ...... _--- 2014-11-06` Xuefeng Wang Cupertino,' CA, United States 2014-11=06 serel. jaques;' santa clara, CA- United. States_ 2014-11-06 Tony Ma ---`---..-____----------................... Cupertino,CA, United States 2014-11-06', �Sam [j _.---_--`--........................ .............. .... ---............................ ......... -... -..... -..... ................ `--^-...... San Jose, CA, United States --............ -...... --......... .-...... ........ ..... ... ... ---_ 2014-11`06� N@r8sh Appannagaari _-.... ................. ...... .................... -- -...... ---------........ --................ Cupertino,CA United States .......................... ....... --~ ---_-------^-._^_- 2014-11-06 XiOhaiYe� _----_-'~---.--_-----_-_-----_-----^-------------------_^--_-_-----_-----~_-^---� ............. ........................... ............. ............................................. �San, jOGe,(�A.[JO�Gd States -...... ............ -^-_ 2O14-11-06 Erica Chien _--_`---... ............................................ ...... Cupertino,. CA, United States 2014-11-06 Michelle Yang -............. ....... ....... ...................................... .................... ,-__..................................... ...... ................. .................................... -SaOta Clara, CA./1n -..... _.... ...... ....... -----------.---------.----.`-`----------`-� ........... ............. ................. -_--- -2014-11,06 OOExdneHeVV . --------------------,.----`._--_- ......... GanfranOjGco. CA, United States � 2014'11+06 jU|ie�S|R|POKE ............. ............................. ............................. ........ ..... --~-'............. Cupertino, CA, United States ................... ........... ----- .2014-11-06_--_-----^-----------.-^^_--_-_-----------------`-----^-^--~------------~,-'_---~--._ SallyHwang _------_------------_---.___---____----- ro'CA' United States 2014-11-06' Shyh Cherng Luo' ............................................ ........................... ^- ............................................................. CA, United States .......................... _-----.... ......... ............... -_-...... --~ 2014-11-06 . Kevin YaO ............ ......... -.......... ........................................................ -.......................... -........ -....... ....... --~---......................... O0.CA, �United States ...... ............. I'll - 2014'11-06 � Mei zhang .... ......... -.................................. ................................... ............................... -... -........... -.......... --.................................... �K8oUOtain VieVVCA.Unit8d States ....... -...... ----- 2014-11-O6 Jean [jDlO0. _~-�~-��--'------_-----'------_---_-----------_---_-^-.'^-_^`_-----_-_--^.___--^_---- .... ................ ...... ........ ~..... CA, United States __-_------_---_--_ 2014-11-06 Madeline Ling ---_-_-._---------_-~-^---------^-^-_ - Cupertino, [�A.i1O�edStates ' 14-11'[K6 BaOOl�k#enkata[a�laO _-~_'....... ................ --~.................... ...... ....................... ........... Cupertino, CA, United States ................ ........... ..... ................................ ................... -.... ..... .......... 2014-11-06 ---_-................ 'aDnie8WO 'Cupertino ....................... ... ... ................................ -........ ---........................................ -CA, United States ............... ................... --............. .......................... _------'--....... ._^... .............. -, 2014-11-08 _...... Rin8Vali2 ... ... ^-......... ................. --................ .................. Cupertino,CA. United States ............. --------'^-� 2014-11-00 _ chaD yichin - .^-................ -.......-............................................................................. ............ ................................................... .... -'..................... ......................... oUperUOO.CA.United Sta1eS ............................................... '2014'11'-06 ' _--~~_'.-^,_.__.'~-- Q�]@0YUan` ......... .............. ......... _... -.... ... .............. ..... .... No',��A.Un�ed States 2Q14 -11-O6 ---_---------___-`----'_--------_---_-------~�-_---_--_------_-_.-__-- EDl0O2VV8| ---~--............ ................... .......... ......................... Cupertino, CA, United �StEt8G ....... ... '... ........... --^' 2814~11;06 � Aj-HsinLiu '.[A, ........... .... ... -............... ............ ____ ................ .............................................. ........ ....... ...................... ~~..~~, United States ............................. ..................... -- 2014-11-06 ��aWy -_-----'-`_`~--^`_'_--__'-__--------__-._^-_---- ~-'....................................................... ...... .................. ............... ......... Cupertino, []O�ed States ... .... --....................................................................... --------_--°-`_----' 2014611-06 ^--............ Benjamin Ting �� --------_---_----,-~_.-___-_------_-----------_----- Cupertino, States 2014-11-06 Heather Tsai -_..... ............. ....... ................................. ......... -_........ San jose.CA, United States ...... ............... ...... ... ....... ...... ................ ...... .--........... -' 2014-11-06' Michelle Lin , .......... ................. ....... ........... ............... -............................................ ........ Coyote, CA, United States, .------ ........... ........... .... ........ ........... _`_ 2014-11-06 `-^'_^...................... ..-SuOLee �� _-_----`-_-------------_`-`---__-------------_---_-'__-_--'_,----__ ............... ..... ... ....... -................. --................. _......... CunertimJi.CA,-United-States -......... ............ ................. -. _2O14-11=06, --~-- ]bal -_........... ---......... Sunnyvale, C& []Oit8&S12t8G ............... 2014-11-06 -_-....................... -EOhui,Ch8O -............. ............. ...... ........ ........... .................................. .................... ----.......... ......................... ---.......... --_-_-........ SanJose-CA'Taiwan --..... .... ... ------_........................... _.-_------...................... -- -2014-11-06 � Bruce ba[O8S ` -__-----,--_-----_...... -.... .............. .... -------- .... .................. Cupertino, �kO0'�. United States ........................................... ................................... ~............. ... _......... -... ................. _' 2014-11 -06, ........... -'-,.......................... ChiuchuaO`Barne8 _---------__--_--_----_---_--------------------�--_._-^-^--`^-_----^^__--_-_^'-- ......... CUp8MjOO.- CA,: United �tateG .-.... ��l1"�_11-06 . Frank Lee ` _---'__-_.-__.-.-_---'-_-_-------------------------_--^---,-_-~---___----~-__` San Jose, CA' []Oit8d.St@t8G 2014-11-06 xiaVVaOYano __--_--_------_-----~_-_'-_--_-------_----- San Jose, ��' United States ............................................................... ��14-11-�� ...... .................... ........ ............~, ..Name: ;' Location Da#e Raymond Chong Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06, Gina Chen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Wai Shan Wong Cupertino,. CA, United States 2014-11�-06 HONG. YU_ Santa Clara, CA,. United. S-tates. 2014-11-06 Suiki Poon Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Jing gong : Cupertino, .CA,.United.States . 2014-11-06 . leana wen Cupertino, CA,°"United States 20.14-11-06 Chihyen-Chen I Cupertino,. States 2014-11-06 Luwen Lin � Cupertino,. CA, United States 2014-11-0.6 Xuemin cai San Jose; ,CA, ,United States 2014-11-06- yun Ian Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06. Ying Lu-, San Jose, CA,. United States 201-4-11--06 Jean sun san Jose, rCA, United States 2014-11-06 Elena Dorabji- Cupertino, CA; United°.States 2014-11-06- Wenhai Zheng Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 jie Ii., Cupertino,, CA-,! United States 2014-1-1-06 - Mina Ang Cupertino,CA, United States 2014-11-06 Manoj.Jayadevan.. F. cupertino,.�CA, United States - 2014=11.-06 . Sanjib Guha Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Chris..Lam t, I Cupertino,,.CA, . United- States_ 2014-11-06. stephanie liu cupertino.; CA,.United,States 2014-11-06 , Shilpa Vibhakar -Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 claudia murray - Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Jun. Zhu San Jose,. CA, United- States. 20.1-4-1-1.-06. . Julie Pearson - Cupertino., CA, United: States 2014-11-06 Dan Nie - Cupertino,_ CA, United States 2014-1.1=06 . Hong Ma, Santa Clara, CA,.'United States 2014=11-06 shida-tan Cupertino; CA,� United States 2014-11-06, Paul Petach. Cupertino; CA,.United States 2014=11-06 Sangeeta Ravindran Cupertino; CA, United; States 2014-11 =06 Liang-Fang Chao Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Pallavi'.Chennoju. santaclara; CA,:United:States- 2014711-06 Name Location Date Hailiang Xing Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Fred Tsai Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Vidya Sundaresan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Keith Chiem Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Ye cong Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Lu Chen cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Anupama Shridar Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Smita Nair Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-06 liyuan chen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Hsin Ning Keng Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Pauline Lee Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Winnie Chang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Hui -Chin Wu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Jenny Cheng Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 huiyang yang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Mridu Talukdar Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Salil Datta Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Xiaopeng Xu Mountain View, CA, United States 2014-11-06 James Murashige Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 qin chen cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Ivan Tsou cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Chetan Valia Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Ishwarlal Valia Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Rikun Tang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Shrey Valia Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Haiming Tang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Pushpavati Valia cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Wenjuan Zhu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Vidya Gundurao Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Yachen Liu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Der -song Lin Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-06 Wei Chen Hollister, CA, United States 2014-11-06 :Name:: L®cati�in Da#e Kristen Lyn Cupertino, CA, United States _. .......... ... _.......... .... .. 2014-11-06 .._ _ _ ......... __ .... _ ........_ . Gordon Gong .. .11 ......_ _ _. _ _.. ' t� ' , CA, United States _. .1.....111 ........ ........ ...... ........... __ ... 2014-11-06 - 11 1 1.,.. ........... Guogang Hu cupertino, CA, United States ___ .... ........ ...... . 2014-11-06 ... Mia Liu ..._ .. ..... Cupertino, CA,'United States- .._... ......... ........ _ 1111. . _1111. 201-4-11-06 ........ .._._... ........... . .... ........ ......... Betty Tang . Cupertino, CA, United States _ _ _. _ .._. 2014-11-06 ..... ..' ................. __ __ Genneva Wang ..................................... __. ...... _ _ cupertino; CA, United States .............................. _ _1.111............_.... I .............. ...... ........ _ _ ......... ._ ...... .. 2014-11-06 _ ....... _........ _ ....................... . Deepa Shah Cupertino, CA, United States .......... _ ..... ....... .... _. _ ....... 2014=11-06 Stephanie Miller ... _ _ Cupertino, CA, United States . _.. ............. _........ ........ ........ __... 2014-11-06- __1111 ...... . ..... _ 1111_ Qing Zhao _ Cupertino, CA, United States _1111_ 2014-11-06 Shashi .VARMA .._ _ .... Cupertino, CA, United States ......... ............. ... ..._ _ ...................... :..._ . ... ..... 2014-11-06 .......... ......................................... ... ......_......I...... I....... .... I.... Srinivasa Murthy Cupertino, CA, United States _.. 2014-11-06 Ching_ Lien San.Jose, CA,. United_States. _ .. _ _ 1111 _1.1.1..1... ......... _._ 2014-11-06. ........ .. ....I ... .. ....1111. . ......... .I...... anny chiu cupertino, .CA, United States _............ _. _ 1.111 __ ..... 2014-11-06 CK Huang ........ Cupertino, CA, United States _ 1111_ _ ... . ... _.. _ _ 11.1..... ................ _...... _ __. 2014-11-06 .......... . ...... ............. .... .. . .... ......... .................. ICHUN LIN San Jose, CA, United States __. ._ . ... ........_ .... _ _ _ _... 2014-11-06 _ ........_ _ ... Weiya Ren ._ San.Jose,. CA,. United States . ... ....... ........................... ....... ....... .. 2014-11-06 ..... . ... ........ _ ....._ _ Yu Hsueh Cupertino, CA, United States .. .................... 2014-11-06 danci. huang . __ _1111.. _ sunnyvale; CA, United States _ ... ........ ........... _ _..._ ........ _ ......... _ 2014-11-06 . ... 1111............ _ __ chengqin ju _ _ ..__ _ .... .... _ ........ cupertino, CA, United States .... _._..... .............. ... ....... ........ ..... ...._........ 2014-11-06 ........ __.... _... 1.1 .1.1..... ... Dawn Mortensen ......... _..... ......... ......... Santa- Clara, CA, United States .... _.. _.... .. .._ ..1..1 1 ... 2014-11-06- ....... _ ........ . ......._. Brenda Qiang 11 1__1.. Cupertino, CA, United States .................... ...................... ............................................ ....... __. _ ...... 2014-11-06 . ......... 1111 _11 ...............11... Mital Pat Cupertino; CA,''United States _......_.............................1111 2014-11-07 savita chari ......... ........ __ Santa Clara, CA, United States __... .. _ . _1111 _... _. ......... 2014-11-07 ..... Ravi Ram _. _. _ _ . _. San Jose, CA, United. States ....... .......... ......... ... ...... ....... .............. _ .. ........ ... 2014-11-07 ................_ ._ Felicia Wu Cupertino, CA, United States _ ......... ....._.... I .' .Felicia 2014-11-07 Hui-ching Hsieh-. ...... _ ......... ........ _ Cupertino, CA, United States- __..... ......... . ...... _...... ......................... ........ ............ ...... 2014-11-07 ._ ............:_...._.__ Wei Chen Chang Chang . _ . _.. _._ Cupertino, CA, United States _ ._ _ _ ....... _ _ _ ...... 2014-11-07 ......... _ . _ Vijay Kulkarni _ _ _ . Cupertino; CA, United States ... ........ _ 111......1 _ ....... _ ....... I—— ...... .................. . 2014-11-07 ....... ............................. Kelly Wang Cupertino, CA, United States _ ......... _ 2014-11-0T ... _ Shagorika Dixit. '1.'......... .... Cupertino,. CA, United States, _ _ _ ..._........ ... .......... ....... ............. 2014.-.11-07, Anwar Awad .................... __... .._. _....... ..... Cupertino, CA, United States _ ...... ... _ . _ _... ......... _. _. 2014-11-07 Koyeli-Mukhe rjee Cupertino,-CA,. United_States ........ ....... .....11 ..1 ............. 2014-11-07 Name Location Date Jenny Chiu San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-07 murali nathan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Tieu Fung Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Lana Shew Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Rhonda Johnson Long Beach, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Mary Reed Bellingham, WA, United States 2014-11-07 Tongwen Huang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Xiaoxinng zhu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Julissa Quintero Miami, FL, United States 2014-11-07 Niti Motwani Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Wayne Chin Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 0000000 Qi Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Christine Liu San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Shuqing ma San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-07 David Lu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Atul Gupta Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Haibin Chen San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Zhongying Chen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Lynn Yang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Jinyuan Qiao Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Tsehsien Vaughn Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Natalie Fossen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 qingwei meng San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Yashan Sun Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-07 supriya sabne Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Jyoti Narang San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Han Qiao San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Dawn Kwok Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Debbie Chen Saratoga, CA, United States 2014-11-07 YanPing Wang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Chien Hsiu Chang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Mary Kavanaugh Long Beach, CA, United States 2014-11-07 :Name;. Location Date John Markham Princeton,.KY, .United States 2014-11-07 Lily lee Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Jessie Ma Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-07. Peter Willson. . . ....................................:............................................................................................. Cupertino,_ CA,- United: States_ .................................................................................................................................................. 2014-11-07 Usha Subramanian San Jose, .CA, United States 2014-11-07, Cheng r .Wang __............... Cupertino, CA,-United,States ................................................................. ............. ._ _. 2014-11707 ............................_...._.................... Chandrasekhar Mukherjee _,......... Cupertino, CA, United. States .................... ..................... I........... ............. . 2014-11-07 Peggy Carter. , Vicksburg,- MS.,: United- States- 201.4-11-07 Chinping Chen.. Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 , . V-ikas-Mishra . _._......... ..... ............._.........................................._.._. Cupertino, CA, United,States- __............................................... ................................. 2014=11-07 ..................... Shirley Wang Cupertino, CA, United States ................................ ...__.. 2014-11-07 . Anand Kothari .................. .................. .......... .............. . Cupertino, CA, United, States- ........ ......... ........ ....... ......:........:............................................... I...... .............................. 20-14-11-07 . ......................... subramanian chebiyam sunnyvale, CA, United States _ .............................................. 2014-11-07 Jerry Hwang . Cupertino, CA, United.-States 2014-11-07- Anuradha Krishnan San Jose, ,CA, United, States 2014-11-07 Barbara Clapper- Cupertino, CA, .United-States 2014-11,-07 Phyllis. Dickstein Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Jianjun Chen ............ _ .....___ .... Cupertino; CA- United--States _ _ .. .._ .,. ... ....... ........ .......... :. _............. 2014-11-07 , Yuh-Juan Hung Cupertino;, CA, United States ... ............ ........ 2014-11-07 Sundari- Pilaka . San, Jose; CA, United States 2014-11-07 Christine Garvale Cupertino,{ CA, United States 20,14-11-07. Eva Kashkooli:, Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07. Ann Huo _ _._._....._............................,....,................................................................................... Cupertino, CA, United, States ___ ....., ... _............................... 2014-11.07 ............................ Linda.Chia- cupertino,. CA,- United. States- _............._,... .. 2014.11-07 Emy Tan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 deepika yammanur Cupertino,. CA,. United States 2014-11-07 , Jocelyn Yeh Cupertino,. CA, United States 2014-11-07 ZUD.IAN- QIN. CUPERTINQ,. CA,. United_ States. 20-14-.1.1.-07 Michael Garvale ........... ............................ ........ ....... ................. Cupertino; CA,-United States ._............................. ............ ... ..... ....................... ... _ .._ _..._ .... 2014-11-07 ...........:......:...... Brittany-trent Clarksville, IN,.: United States .. _.......... 2014.-11-07. Vandana Nathan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07- Ben. Wang- Santa Clara,. CA,. United. States- 2014-11-07 . Name Location Date Jenny W Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Jiong cao Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Shan Cai Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Eddie L Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Soniac Chen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Minoo Mehta Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Sangeetha Srinivasan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Hong Luo San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Brenda Gaisies-Smith Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Li Chen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Rohini Kashibatla Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Vaishnavi Sridhar Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Yonghui Zhang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Ram Laxmanan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Sapna Gupta Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Dong Han Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-11-07 Qi Wang San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-08 Deepa Rao cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-08 Xiao Zha Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-08 keiko black-hogins Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-08 bill black-hogins cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-08 gayathri jayanthi Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-08 Sam Nazhand Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-08 Parisa Nazhand Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-08 dorothy cheng cuptertino, CA, United States 2014-11-08 sammy wang cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-08 Angus Chen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-08 bertha molina sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-11-08 Sridhar Seshadri Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-08 Parul Gupta Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-08 Moma S Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-08 Deepali Narula Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-08 . Name Location Dafe Jimmy McAfee Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-08 Vidya Venkataraghavan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-08 Zhen Li, Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-08 : . steve herhusky- cupertino; CA, UnitedStates 2014-14-08- Qian Zhao ; . Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11:-08 Tom MacDonald- Cupertino, CA., United States- 2014-11-08-- ... Chuan Hsueh CUPERTINO, CA, United States 2014-11-08 Edward Puccinelli Cupertino, CA, United States 20t4-tt-08- ................. ..... Monica Quon Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-08 Matangi-Rajamani- Cupertino-, CA, United States- 2014-11-08- Deepika Kapil - Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-09 ' John Talan - Cupertino, CA, United States 20-1-4 1-1--09- Julia Zhou Redwood City, CA, United States 2014-11-09 . ................................................... Irene wang-: cupertino, CA, United. States. 2014--- . -11-09 . Yi Ke Wang cupertino, CA,.United States 2014-11-09 Aanchal. Gupta . Cupertino.,. CA,- United States 20-1.4-1.1-09. Nancy: Boyle Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-09 rueyeh chen Cupertino,.CA, :United States 2014-11-09, Don Yuh Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-09 Sioe- Tjhan- Cupertino,. CA,. United. Mates_ 20-1-4-t1-09_ Tao Lin Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-09 Bin-Liao Santa-Clara, CA, United States- 2014-11-09- Jianyong Zhang tri • ., CA, United, States 2014-11-09 Huiqin-Tang- Cupertino,. CA, United States 2014-11-09- Hong Huang san jose, CA, United ;States 2014-11-09 ._ ................. ......... _........ ........ Peter-tian _.._,_ .._ _.......... ....:..:. ....._ ......... ............... __._._ Cupertino; CA, United-States- _.............. ..... ................ 2014-11-09 Jennifer zeng Cupertino,. CA, United States 2014-11-09 Jiayan Wang Sunnyvale, CA, United-States 2014-1.1=09 Xiaowei Yee San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-09 Min-Tu: Cupertino,, CA., United-States- 2014-11-09 - Yan Wang , • ' t_jS 9hQ , , CA, United -States 2014-11-09 Wei- Zhong- Santa Clara,. CA, United States- 2014.11.09 RODg Rnno --_--_-'__--................. Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-09 -.---............ Jonathan-GreeM __---.^---.~-_---~---_------_-'-.-.---------------^-_--~ ................................................. .......... --... .............. ...... ................................. 'CUOertiOO.CA.��n�ed States --^--......... ... ......... � ZMUoy|mg\an�] ----------------.--___---`.-.-_ ...... -----.............. CA, �' L]n�ed States ................... -_--.-_-'--� 2014-11-09 ij|UaM\j ` .... ........ ................. ........... ........... ___ -----......... .......................................... -....... -........................ -Mountain View, CA, United States _'_^--........ ......... ............ .......... ........ ' -2014-11-09 _`__--........ MichelleHuang- -----�---_---'~^-----_-'_-,--__--------^--~^.--_------_--^-----__~,_'~---_-----^-_--_ .................. ....... -.... ...... -.......... ................ ........ Cupertino' CA' United States ..... ..__-... .......... __' 2014-11-09 Y��O U * .... ....................... ...... ............. ............................. Cupertino,-CA, -United- States --... .-^-----_ -2014-l1'09 _--_-------_---^ David M2 ... -... ............. --------........... ... ...... ................................... ............ ........... .................. Sa"jQse, CA, United States ------_--__-----_---------_-_-_-.--_-.------__' 2014'11-09 XU8 �� .............................. ..................... ........... .... Cupertin0' CA, United States _.......... .2014-11-08 _-'___ YaO [j --.----._.._-__--_-._------_---,_-.-_-_---------------_-_--__-_^-_-_.~,-_-^_-� ..... ............. ..................... ....... .................. ..................... _--.......... Cupertino, CA, United States ........ ........ 2014-11-09 ` _CeN{Un zoW -_-~.--`-__--_---,_-_`.----_--'---_'- Cupertino, CA, ... ........... -----_----__'__-__-_'.-_� ��)14-1l-]g� RayMUaOgSaO-JDGe. ----- ----------- -... ... ---- CA, United States 2014-11-09_------_----`_---------_-_--^-___-----------------------.-~^--__.---_^-'-^-----_--- TingtirTg \A&ano .__--_._~-~-_-----_~_~--__--_----__--'--' -SanJome,C&[1nited -States ---_---.................... -2014-11-09 ` Yeping Zh2D� --------- SBn]Qse' CA, United States -_'_...... ---------'_ 2014-11-09 ..... `-_----_-----.--------------_----_-__-~----------_--.-_� hole --_---_'--_--_----�~-__--_-------_----^-'_--_-'_--^- .-Cupertino, CA.i]Oited�States 2014-11-09 _--_' jWlieGleaveG .......................... Cupertino, CA, United States -...... __..... ~... ............ 2014-11-09 -_--_--_---...................... .-............ -Sherry Wu . -......... ~~.................................. .......... ^^...... ........ ............. ................................... ........ ..................... .......... ............ SaO-JoGe.CA, United States .......................................... ............. -----............. _--_� -2-014~11-09., _-- Lei Wang ' ............. ....... -_-______-'_----_^_--'_-_----------------------__-'_---_---------.-_^- .................... -......... ... ----...... ....... ~ ktrW~ , CA, United States ...... ................ ...... ... ............. 2014-11-09 -Hu�|uiyDDg � _--------___ no,[�A�[]O�f��tQteG _2014-11 -09 ---~__----_.---_------------------------_--'^-_--_-,_-_-_--_--,---_. �"ilg/�hoh ' no,CA.United States 2014-11-09 __--................ ......... ......................... _......................... -SUGhHH2 _-`.-_ --------`-_-_°----_-_--_--.--............................................................................................................ ........... -.................................. --......... ..................................... C��[jn�ed�tEt8G _-,_--. -'` ............ ... .... _`---.` 2Q14'11-1[] ^........................... .............. YiOqhW@HWaDg _�~-_-~-------^---_'-----_---_-----------__---'-_----_---_---_-_-- Cupertino,CA� United States , 2014-11-10 ' .-.,_'---._' --Hu ............................... ................. Sunnyvale,CA,-United States .... -...... 201^4-11-10 ^^-- Vickie Chin ��' � _-_^------__^--'_-'_---............. .... ... .................. .................. -_--..................... _, CA, United States __-............. .................. +- ............. ................ ......... ............... 2014-11-1O' �-A-daO-Martinez � � -.... ............ ............ .............. ........ .............. .................... ......... ........................... --.... nO'CA, {]nitedStates ................................... ....... ......... ....................... -............. ........... -,..... -_...... ___ _---.... -2014-1140 ' ... ........... ..... .............. _ Wendy Chang � '_-_^--_-_-^-----------^--`-^------------------------------___--------^_----^---_- - Cupertino, CA, United States -~'........ 2014-11-10 ��'��l8 � -................. O0'CA, []Oited -States 20M4-11-1T) ............ ---^_-°'-,^-.--,--_--------------------------_-_-----_----_----_------^- VVen�Og tBOQ � /� Cupertino,. CA, United States 2014-11-10 � ........................ ... .......... ........................... ................. janO8GShih _............... .............. ......... ...... ................................................................. ...... ................................ Callahan, CA' United States _ ................ ...................... ............. _ 2014-11-10 ~.--.---� ............................................... FAN PENG KONG -----------_`-_---_-.--_-----------------------------------'_---`_-_--_-_^~-_.--_`. -........ ........ -........ ..... ......... ...... _--............. ....... Cupertino,CA. United States ................... .......... ........... �1�11-10 � ��8DyU-��U `'� --------_-------_--------_---_-----_---------------____-------_----_~--_--.. Cupertino,-CA'UnitBd -States 2014'11__1[] ' Xuan Chen ' ... Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-11~10 ` ............... ... ................................................................ Joe Chang ....... ................... ... ... ....................................................... ......................................... CW�8[tinD' CA, United States ....... ......... --`-_� - 2014-11-10 ' ',Name ". Locatron Date Rachel Pan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-.11-10 Szu-1-Huang " "- _ ..._............._...__..._......_....................... ............. cupertino; C�4, United-States- ..__.................._... ... .... ..... ........ _...._.................... ................ ............. 2014-11-10- .:................ ........ :.......................... .... Sri Radhakrishnan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-10 Jing Liu ' , . Cupertino, CA; United States 20-14=,11-1-0- NELSON D'SOUZA Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-10 Tristan- Lorach : Cupertino, CA, United-States- 2014-.11--10-_ Anna Black-Hogins Cupertino, CA, 'United States 2014-11-10 Rahul. Ravulur..: Cupertino; CA,.'United-States. 20-1.4- 1- 0- sundar narayanan cupertino,, CA, United States 2014-11-10 Matthew Stephan Cupertino; CA,- United States 2014-11-10 Weng Chan Cupertino;, CA, United States 2014=11-10 Hatem, Fahmi. Sunnyvale;'CA;. United. States 201.4,1-1.'-1.0_ Saravanan Coimbatore Cupertino, CA, United States . 2014-11-10 . ming.ma- ' , � ' Santa- Clara,: United-States- 201411-10. Maria Mokrzycki Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11.10 Bethany Stephan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11 1-0- DON SAVANT CUPERTINO, CA, United States 2014-11-10 Raja-Ramakrishnan- ..........._...................._,-.............._............._.............................___:,.__..................._... "Cupertino; CA-,.United-States- 2014-1140-� Feiqi su San Jose, CA, United States _......... .......... .:........... I——........ .:..... 2014-11.-10 Ying Zhou- If7 , -CA,. United: States 2014-11--1-0- Tao Chen-Cupertino, CA; United States 2014-11-10 Gface'hu- Saratoga;" CA, United-States- 2014-11--10 Christina wang" Saratoga, CA, United States 2014-11-10 Lai- Chen- • Saratoga, CA,.United •States 2014-11-10 Khushi Valia Cupertino,,CA, United States 2014-11-10 ' Qinyu-ma- ` , Saratoga; CA, United-States- 201-4-1:1.-10. '. Shu Chen . - Cupertino, CA, United'States 2014-11-10 Paru- Somashekar. cupertino,- CA,- United States- 201.4-1.1-1-0, Muzhou Shao ' Cupertino,-,CA,- United States 201.4-1140 Roger Qing-Cupertino, _CA, United' States 2014-11-10 Saihong Song': ` San Jose, CA,".United States 2014-11-10 Sandeep Sharma. Sunnyvale,,: CA,: United- States 2.014-11-10 Name Location Date Kavitha Seshadri Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-10 Jiten Vaghela Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-10 hong yu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-10 Jerry Zhang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-10 King yin Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-11-10 Girija Subramanya Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-10 Emily Underwood Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-10 Bingxi Wood Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-11 liqin zhao Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Jun Shi Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Scott Putterman Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Lisa Chiang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Shaloo Chaudhary Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Thuy Dang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Peter Lee Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Anh Dang CUPERTINO, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Ellen Kolstee Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Bruce Nilo #document, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Yanping Jin Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Lily wang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Aashika Jain Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-11-11 long ma San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Karin Papas Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Elangovan Shanmugam Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Yan Hu Saratoga, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Gopal Kumarappan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Hemalatha Shanmugam Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-11 liz zhang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Xiaofang Ding Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Katsumi Matsunami CUPERTINO, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Jin wang San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Jing Hu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-11 NameL® cation a D#e Pamela Hershey ......... 1111. Cupertino, CA, United States __ 1111 1111.. .. _11.11. _ . _.. ....... ..... 2014-11-11 .......1111. William :Hershey Cupertino, CA, United States _ ....... 2014-11-11 ....... ... ........... . Sujatha Krishnakumar _.. .. ......... Cupertino, CA, United States .... ...... .. .. _. __ 1111. _ _ .......... _ _... 2014-11-11 ._._. ....... _ __ Yuan Wang Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-1.1-11. ........ _...... ......_ Wei Wang .... __....... Cupertino, CA, United States ......... ........ _..._...... ..... _.._... ......... ........ 2014-11-11 ...... _.._... .. ......_ ..... Anuta Udyawar _ . Cupertino; CA, United- States- 11.1 1 ........_ ....................._.... _............. ..... 1 ___ ._...._ _............. 20-14-1-1--11- _ .__ ........... 1111. _111...........1 _ ..................._ 1111 _....._1111 Ritty Zhai .. 1111. _ Cupertino, CA, United States ........ ......... ..... 1-1 .......... _..._ ...._._ ... ..I..... .._ ... _. 2014-11-11 _.. ..... .. ..... ......... ..... zhenguo guan Copertino, CA, United States _ .......... . 2014-11-11 anna zhou Newark, CA, United States 2014-11-11 Lily Mock Santa clara-, CA, United States 201-4-1-1-1-1 ......... _ __ Reecha Tandon _ ...._ ... _. .I....... 1-1 ......... ..... ......... ...... Cupertino, CA, United States ........ ....I.... .. .. ......... .._ __ ....... 2014-11-11 .....111 1 Jinhun Shou Cupertino, CA, United States ............. .. _ .. _....... _. _ 2014-11-11- .......... Laura Smith Cupertino, CA, United States _ _.. . 2014-11-11 Jianguang li cupertino-; CA,. United States ......... ........ . _ 1111 ..... ......... _ . ....... 2014-11-11 __. __.. Ritesh Tyagi cupertino, CA, United St ........ ................ ..... ................. ..... ..11_ ......... ... ... ...11 Peng Jin .... .... ........ _ .. AMM, CA, United States ..... .... _. __...._.... _. _ ........ 2014-11-11 ......... ........ ..... ... _.. Gurmeet Lamba Cupertino, CA, United States ......... .1111__ __ 1111. 1111 .......... 2014-11-11 ....... Judi Babcock _1111 Santa- Clara, CA, U ...... _ 1111 ....... ....... ..... ............. Alan Penn ......... ........ Cupertino, CA, United States ............_.. .... ............ — ..1.......1 ........1 ........1 1111 _ _ .. . 2014-11-11 11._ 11 ....._ _. _ _ 1 111..._ .. ......_.. _ Ling Li Sunnyvale, CA, United States 11 ....... . 2014-11-11. ........ ....... . MeghnaAgrawal Cupertino, CA, United States ................ _. 2014-11-11 _.. _ joyce samson sunnyvale, CA, United States _ ......._... 1111 .. . 2014-11-11 Yanhong Li ...... Cupertino, CA, United States .........................................._........... .I .......... ._....... ......... .................. 2014-11-12 .........._ Yan Cai .. ......... ..... .... ...... �Kj7&-, CA, United States ._ . _ . _ .__._ . ... ............ .. _ _. ...._ _ ... I ... ....... ............ . 2014-11-12 _................. Bill King United States .... .1 .... ...... ,111__1. 1111 _ .._._ 11 11. ..... 2014-11-12 ....... ......... ........ Kiran Atlluri .......... _ Cupertino, CA, United States _ ... _ 11.1...1. .. ...1111. 2014-11-12 Wei Luo ... _ Cupertino, CA, United States 1111...__ ............. ..... ......... 2014-11-12 .............. .... .._._..._....... 1111 1111......................._.. Xue Wang _ _ _. _ I., .......................... Santa Clara, CA, United States _.. _ 1111...... ...... .... _.. . ........ 2014-11-12 sunil naik .......................... cupertino, CA, United States ........ ....... ......... — ....1 ........ 1 111 _ 2014-11-12 ... ......... ........ Utpala Sharma ....... .......... .............. Sunnyvale, CA, United States ................................................___ ...... ....... ..................... ... .......... ......... 2014-11-12 ........... _....... .... ....... ...... ... Mark Papas - ... ... ... ........ _ ... Cupertino, CA, United States _111.1. - _.. _ _ _ ......- ............ 2014-11-12 Wendy Liu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-12 Name Location Date dhana suresh .......... ..................... .................................................................................................................... Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-12 ...................... ............................ Ping Fan ........................................................... Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-12 ..................... -.-........................ ............. Wei Yuan ....._..................._....__............................._................_......... ... _............._....._......_............_......._ ............... ........ .._...................................................... Sunnyvale, CA, United States _ ... ............................ 2014-11-12 Ashwini khaparde ....... ............ .............. ._....................... .........................._._................._........._................................_...................................._..................... Santa Clara, CA, United States ........ ......................... 2014-11-12 ......... I ................ ...... _ ................. . ..................................................................... Zhou Hong .. ....................... .... .__. _ Cupertino,. CA, United States 2014-11-12 ...........................................:...............................................................................................................................................................................................................:........:...1. Hui Zeng Sunnyvale, CA; United States 2014-11-12 ......... .. _ ....... ..... ................ _ ... _._._................_ ....... ...._.........................................._._......._............................. Yunlei duan __....... ........ _... ................... ._.__._..... Cupertino, CA, United States ..... 2014-11-12 ....................................................................................................................................._..._........................................_..............._...................._:.._............................... Julia wan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-12 . ....... .._.......... ......................... ................. ............................................ Jinghua Li .... ... ....... ..................... .__ _ ..........._ .........:_......... .... ................. Cupertino, CA, United States ................. I—— .................. 2014-1.1-12 .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... jeff lu .... _....................._..........._........._ ....._. _............ San Jose, .CA, United States ...._...... ... .I......_ .... ............. ........... ..... ._....:..... __....... _ 2014-11-12 ............... ..... .......... .... .......... ... Joanne Pugh Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-12 Aaron Hill - Denver, CO, United States ........ ...._...... ..... 2014-11-13 ..........._. ............. ................. ....... ... ........ .................. _...................................... __ Tracy McMillan . ............... ..... ................................................ :.................. ........... ........ ... . ........ ....... .._... ............ .,....... ... _....._ Front Royal, VA, United States ............................................................................................................................................................................ 2014-11-13 amaris elguezabal ...__ ...... ........... ...................... .................... ...... ....................... Miami, FL, United States I...... .... ... _...... _..............................................::........................................:..I............. 2014-11-13 Saumya Prasad _.....__ ._ ...._................................. ............._.............._...._....._.............................._.. Cupertino, CA, United States ....... ................................ .._............................................. 2014-11-13 ...... .-....... ............ ... Anan Rampersad _................. . Brooklyn, .NY, United States _............................................................ ...... _---- _....... .._........ ................ ................................. 2014-11-13 ........................... .... Edwin Menjivar ... ............ ............_.................................I............ hyattsvill% MD, United States ... _..........__.....................I..................._....... ................... ...................... .................... 2014-11-13 ............................................... Raul Cordero Miami, FL, United States 2014-11-13 ................ ..... ......... .......... ...:.. _ ._:.................... louis alves ........ ... ............. ........ ... ... ... .... .............. .................... snaville, GA, United States ................................................... I......................... 2014-11-13 .......... .............................. .................................. ........................................................_............................ Mirna Gomez - - .................. .................................... Geneva, IL, United States ' 2014-11-13 ampelia Casillas .._...._-..................... _ ................ ......................... Hillsboro, OR, United States .............. ......... .............. __,........... ....................... ............ ....... _._ 2014-11-13 .............................. I—— .................... Roland Castillo Laredo, TX, United States I ............ ..................___ ...... ..._..... ............ ...._...... ...... 2014-11-13 .. .._.....,...... ........ I ... I ... ........ ..... .... ............. ....__........._......................_ ..._......... George Yates ................... Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-13 Katherine Cruz Abingdon, MD, United States ..... ............ ....__...................._...................................._................... 2014-11-13. _............ _...._....................................................... Chooticha Techavichian ._..................._..................................._......................................................... .............._.........._....... LA, CA, United States _......................... ................................. 2014-11-13 ................................. .......... .................._., Dorothy Reeves Coos Bay, OR, United States 2014-11-13 tracy lam ........... ................. .......................... ............ __........ Philadelphia, PA, United States ..................................... .............. _ ... .......... _._... _............... .......... ....... 2014-11-13 ._.................... ........ ................. ... Leslie Patzel Rincon, GA, United States .......................................................................................... 2014-11-13 ............._................................................... ................................... Jacqueline Melendez ... ................................ ..................... ............... ................................................................. ............ I .................. _ Las Vegas, NV, United States ... ........... ...... ........................ ......... 2014-11-13 .. ........ ............................ ............... ankita das towson, MD, United States ............. ............... .......... ..................... ... ..................... 2014-11-13 .,....,............. .... .._......... ............. .... ...._ . ............ .._......._........................_............_.... Sheryll Punneo ............ ........... .................................. .......................... .............. Liberty, MO, United States .................................... .......... ..... ............. .__ .................. 2014-11-13 _...._........ ............ ........ ......._.. Yazbek Campos ... _.._...._...._............................................................_......._::_........................_.:...........................................................,.._.........................................................:.. INGLEWOOD, CA, United States 2014-11-13 .Name:; ,. `; Location Qate Stacie-Miller Hesperia, CA, .United:States 2014-11-.13 Natividad, Jr. Cruz Round Rock, TX, United States 2014-11-13. . Norma Kafer Phoenix, AZ, United States: 2014-11-13 Yong Teng .......:................_ ......__.............__........................_........_.._......................................................................................................................... Cupertino,,CA, United-States 2014-11-13 .................I.............. Jingjing Bian Cupertino, CA, United-States 2014-11-13 Christopher Bencher Cupertino; CA, United States 2014-11-13 - Sampanna Shanbbhag Santa clara, CA, United States 2014-11-13 - Ii yu =.Cupertino, 'CA,' United States 2014-1,1-13 Haijun.Xia . , Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-::13 .. Suyou he San Jose,.CA,.United States :._.................... 2014-;11-13 _.............. _.......__............_........ . _.......... __.._._ Xiaojun liu ......,... _ ..... .........I........._ _.........................................._ San Jose; C&I United States ............ ..._................... .................. .. 2014-11-13 . Ella Reeves',- ................_ ... Vancouver, CA, United States _...._..................................................... ......_..:..... 2014-.11-14 ............. I....... ................... .......__............._....................................._...__ Janice McGrogan Nazareth, PA,. United States 2014-11-14 Amanda Reale .-jacksonville, FL, .United States 2014-11=14 David Tapia '.: philadelphia, PA,. United States 2014-11-14 Joyce.Park ..... .Lancaster, CA, United States .................. ... ................................... ................................................ ...... 2014-11-14 ............... :.......................... _......... _..................................... scott taylor los angeles, CA, United States _..................... . 2014-11-14' . Florence Windfall Berkeley, CA, United States ............._............ ....:................................................................. 2014-11-14 , ....... .............. ..._........... .......... ............................................. ...... I........."..__........... Shaun Fritts' _. _ Cleveland, TN, United States ... 2014-11-.14 Pamela Yeary Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-14 Natasha Lan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-14 Danielle wu . Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-1.5 jian Zhang Santa Clara, CA, United. States 2014-11-15 Tony Xiong � � CUPERTINO, CA, United,States 2014-11-17 Bhaskar Ranade Santa Clara, CA, . United ,States .2014-11717 Tianxi zhang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-17 PreethiBangalore ...... Cupertino........... .... _ .._... .... ,......... _.................... ....... ............ I... ........... ............ _ Lynn Puccinelli ; Cupertino, CA; United States 2014-11-18 joe Zhang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-18 Weiting Wang Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-18 Harsh Deshpande Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-1&..' . Siying Yang Cupertino; CA; United States 2014-11-18, Name Location Date Kevin Reed Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-18 Winnie Ngan Hong Kong, , Hong Kong 2014-11-18 Jie Lin Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-18 Jimy Liu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-18 H J Saratoga, CA, United States 2014-11-18 Sheldon Zhai Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-19 Alfred Yeung Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-20 Michelle Lingofelter Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-20 Govind Tatachari Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-20 Edwin kang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-20 Linda Wren Aiken, SC, United States 2014-11-20 Lyndsi Olinger Big Lake, MN, United States 2014-11-20 Kevin Piimauna Huntington Beach, CA, United States 2014-11-20 sherry worden Columbus, OR United States 2014-11-20 dan cappello lawrence, PA, United States 2014-11-20 Larry Hendler Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-20 Hua Zhong Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-20 kelly Wilson 95014, CA, United States 2014-11-20 Anu Shah cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-20 Muneesh Goomer Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-20 Jaina Shah cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-20 Sami Laine Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-20 Jack Kang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-20 Leemon Jen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-20 swarna dandapani cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-20 Jim Kao Los Altos, CA, United States 2014-11-20 Oliver Kao Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-20 Hui Zang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-20 Hong Chen San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-20 yakgna arumugam San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-20 GENG CHEN San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-20 Amy Blocher Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-20 Name Location Date Leslie Wang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-1.1-20 Pam Durham Sunnyvale;.CA,,United States 20.14=11-20 Benaifer Dastoor Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-21 supraja swarna Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-21 .. ............ Swarna Manickam Cupertino; CA,'United States 2014-11-21 . David Ong Cupertino, CA,- United- States .................... 201.4.-1.1-21 Beiqi Gu Cupertino, CA,: United States ....... ... ...... 2014-11-21 M Evangelista, San Jose, ,CA, United States ..... ............. 2014=.11-21 Vicky Hung Cupertino, CA,'United States ..................... ..... 2014-11-21 Candy Bowman Sacramento, CA, .Unitedt States .......... ..... 2014-11-21 Robin Brown Cupertino, CA, .United States ....... .......... 2014-11-21 Yoko Maeda Cupertino, CA, United States ...... ..... 2014-11-21 Satish.Kowkuntla Cupertino, CA, United States ................. ...... 2014-11-21,,, rachael hoffeld-norsworthy Baton Rouge, LA, United States 2014-11-21 -. Jaya Krishnakumar Cupertino, CA, United States ........ 2014-11-21 Jason Bowman . Placerville,'CA., United States 2014-11.-21 Shankar Iyer Cupertino, CA; United States 201:4-11=2.1'. . Vidula Aiyer Cupertino; CA; United States .. ......... ..... 2014-11-21 David Turczynski Severn, MD,. United States; ......... . 2014-11-21, NagaJyothi Kowkuntla Cupertino, CA, United States . ........_. 2014-11=21. chunling yang Cupertino, CA, United States ................ 2014-11-21 chaoyuan yang Cupertino, CA, United States . 2014-11-21 Stephen Wu. ...................... Cupertino, CA, United States .. ............._.... .... _...._. 2014-11-21 kelly zhai Cupertino, CA, United States ........ ................. . 2014-11-21 Kate S Bear, DE,, United States... .. ........... ..... ............ 2014-11-21 . Jieh Yuan Chen Cupertino,, CA, United States .....I ................... ...... 2014-11-21 David Maes Cupertino, CA, United States ..........I I.. I ................ 2014-11-21 Sandip dasgupta cupertino, CA, -United States 2014-11-21 Xing Xiong t� '' , CA, United States _. . 2014-11-21 ................. Wing Wong Saratoga, CA, .United States 2014-11-22 Yingju-Sun Cupertino, CA; United States .......................... . 2014-11-22 David Ranney , Cupertino, CA, United States ............................... . 2014-11-22 Name Location Date anthony xie Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-22 Theresa Leon -Espinoza Tucson, AZ, United States 2014-11-22 Li Yu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-22 Rebecca Huff Lake Havasu City, AZ, United States 2014-11-22 Marguerite Groom Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-22 Olivia Seprish Snow Shoe, PA, United States 2014-11-22 Helen Qian San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-22 Wendy Campbell Hinesville, GA, United States 2014-11-22 Yinglian Xie Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-22 Sean brashear Henderson, NV, United States 2014-11-22 Chris H Brattleboro, VT, United States 2014-11-22 Robert McKibbin Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-22 Sandra Echeverria Los Angeles, CA, United States 2014-11-22 Enugo Ramirez West Hollywood, CA, United States 2014-11-22 Mary Raby Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-22 Tara Hodnett Bronx, NY, United States 2014-11-22 Sandra Gamboa North Hollywood, CA, United States 2014-11-22 Nguyen Phu Quang Buon Ma Thuot, Viet Nam 2014-11-22 vaibhav gautam Fremont, CA, United States 2014-11-22 Katy Wang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-22 R Wang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-22 Xingang Zhao lAt-ji #-ft, CA, United States 2014-11-22 Arthur/Dolores Federico Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-22 Tai Cheng Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-22 Samantha Kelly Bartlett, TN, United States 2014-11-22 Sandra Bachman Cayucos, CA, United States 2014-11-22 Kara Graul Stafford, TX, United States 2014-11-22 Hiu Yung Wong Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-22 Maariz K. lawerencville, GA, United States 2014-11-22 ileana roger hialeah, FL, United States 2014-11-22 Wayne Maiewski Hatfield, MA, United States 2014-11-22 AiPing Lee Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-22 Name= LocafrQn Date mike lyons ..........._.................._.................._.:..............._.........._ sewaren; NJ, United States . _ __..............._.............._..._...._............._...................................._ 2014-11-22 .._.......................................... Nancy. Walsh . .... _ ... .. _ ._......................... ........................................ Independence, MO, United States _......... .............. ................. ......... _.............. ............. _........... ............ ...... 2014-11-22' . .......... ................._.._......... . Tammy Pittman ..........._..............................................................................._....................._....._...................._................................:............................._..............................._................. Greenbrier, AR, United States 2014-11-22 Mary Thomas. Davila ....... .......................... .............................................. Richmond, CA, United States ............... .............................. .............. ......................................................................................... 2014-11-22.,. .... .................. theresa stone ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... palm springs, CA, United States .. ........... 2014-11-22 Megan Faber .......___ .................................. ......................................... .: -Denver, CO, United States ............................... _........ ... .......... ..:.................. ...................... 2014-11-22 . __....... .......................... ............... Carol Hetricks .................... ...................................... .................... Lebanon,. PA, United States ........... I.............. I........... __..... ........................... ..... 2014-11-22 Susan Hopper ......_ ......._ ....... _.. .. ...._..... ............. ..................... St. Louis, MO, United States _........................._.....:.............. __........... ................................................. .............................. .............. .... . 2014-.11-22 _......._ Brian Uhe ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ........... Pittsfield, IL, United States .................... 2014-11-22 Sheila Dillon - ... ............. ............. ..... ........... .......... ..................... .......................... Willmar, MN, United States . ...................... ................. ................................................ ............... .... 2014-11-22 .:................................... Jessica Clupp . ..............._....................._..... ............ Baltimore, MD, United States ............. ... .......I.... ..... ............. ... .................. .................... 2014-11-22 ..__..............._................. Kristin Johnson ................................ ..,........ ........... ............._.__................ _.._................... Iowa City, ,IA, United States ...... ......::... ............................................................. ........... ............ ................................ 2014711-22 Lindsey Ogle .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Chesapeake Beach, MD, United States .............. .................. ... ... I.... .......... 2014=11-22 Andrew Vassell _........................................................................................................................................................................................ Palm Bay,, FL, United States .. 2014-11-22 .........................:....... John Frey ........................................ .......... ........ ............ ..................... Cupertino, CA, United States ............. ............................ .... ................ .................................... ............................ ............ 2014-11-23 :........ ................................. Wuudiann Ke Cupertino, CA, United States .... 2014-11-23 Roberta Limoli-barufaldi ......................................................................................_..........._................_......................................._...................___..........._.......................................................... Burlington, MA, United States 2014-11-23 Parama Dutta ............_.............. .............. ....................:..:............................. Cupertino, CA, United States ... ..... ....... ..._:..... ...................... .... .... ...,..... ..... .......................................... 2014-11-23 _:................ .... ........... Yong Yang ................ ........ ............... ..................:_............................................................_.................................................................................................._.................._......... • ttf. ' ; CA, United � States 2014-11-23 _.. katherine fan : ; ' Sunnyvale, CA, United States ........... . _, ................... ........... 2014-11-23 . . ..............................._....._........................................................................I...__...1 jesse yang ................................. ............................ .........................:...,.. Sunnyvale, CA, United States ........ ............ ............. .................................................. _.......... ................................. ............ ...... 2014.-11-23 .......... .................................... ....... Alice Zhu :... Cupertino, CA, United States ............... ....__............ ...... .................. _..... _................. ........... ...... ........... 2014-11-23 ......................... ........................ .............. ...._................... Raj Banakar ...................... ....... ......................................_........._................... ..... _ Cupertino, CA, United States _ __...................................................................... .,.......................... .............._............_._...... 2014-11-23 ........ ........... _........... Timothy Estes Wahiawa, HI,- United, States .......... 2014-11-23. Jay Werner .._ ..............._ .................... ....................... Hartsdale; NY, United States ............................. ....... .......... ....._......................... ................. _.__................... 2014-11-23 ................ bill nolan ' Salt Lake City, UT, United.States .................. ..2014-11-23 Dipali Rana ...... ............................. .................. _............... ..... Passaic, NJ, United States .................. .... _.......... ................... ... ............ .._....... ... ....... .............. ............................. 2014-11-23 nuri saral Allentown, PA, United States ........................ .... 2014=11-23 . Rama Vallabhaneni ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-23 Deborah Ledbetter I Canon City, CO, United States 2014=11-23 .. Sharyn Shubert _....._....................................._.........................................___......................................_..............----..._......................._............................................................. Naples, .FL, United States 2014-11-23 STEFANIE RACKS BROOKLYN, NY, United States 2014-11-23 Name Location Date Nancy Yarosis Benson, NC, United States 2014-11-23 Barb Travis Ewa Beach, HI, United States 2014-11-23 Wendy Johnston Gilmer, TX, United States 2014-11-23 maria nicklas rockville, MD, United States 2014-11-23 Lori Avalos Los Angeles, CA, United States 2014-11-23 Robert Rodriguez Fort Collins, CO, United States 2014-11-23 Glenda Lilling Port Chester, NY, United States 2014-11-23 Barbara Lipton Grass Valley, CA, United States 2014-11-23 Jeff Dearman Winchester, MA, United States 2014-11-23 megan gear Bedford, VA, United States 2014-11-23 misha turov LA, CA, United States 2014-11-23 Mark Chelchowski Tarrytown, NY, United States 2014-11-23 Amy Youngbauer LaCrosse, WI, United States 2014-11-23 Debbie Rinaldi Bedford, NY, United States 2014-11-23 nikki woolums muncie, IN, United States 2014-11-23 Jennifer Hawker Crestline, CA, United States 2014-11-23 Anna 3apeBo Aurora, CO, United States 2014-11-23 carolyn massey quincy, IL, United States 2014-11-23 Irmita Castro -Ramos Annandale, VA, United States 2014-11-23 heatherjoy klein plantation, FL, United States 2014-11-23 auraelia emery Glendale, AZ, United States 2014-11-23 John Holton Whiting, NJ, United States 2014-11-23 ivonne carlson Bonita Springs, FL, United States 2014-11-23 Lisa Kowalski Webster, NY, United States 2014-11-23 Marlee Grover Douglasville, GA, United States 2014-11-23 MARICRUZ LOPEZ EL PASO, TX, United States 2014-11-23 Debbie Biere Barnhart, MO, United States 2014-11-23 debra tomajko Somerville, NJ, United States 2014-11-23 Samantha Radloff Valdosta, GA, United States 2014-11-23 Dalia E. Hettfield South Gate, CA, United States 2014-11-23 Susan Moses Chattanooga, TN, United States 2014-11-23 Alicia Norris Pawleys Island, SC, United States 2014-11-23 Name: Locat[on Date Amber Steet. san.antonio, TX, United States 2014-1.1-23. . michael dover� , York, $C, United States . 2014-11-23 Liza Pate. Mabank, TX, United States 2014-11-23 Celeste Costa-Rodrigues Mineola, TNY, United.States. 2014-11-23 . Mildred Wells ;Oxnard, CA, United States .. 2014-11-23 = . Chuck Loch Culver City, CA, United States 2014-11-23 Edward Laurson Denver, CO, United States , 2014-11-23', Brad Nelson. Oxnard, CA., United States 2014-11-23 Alexis Nixon Newark, NJ, United States 2014-11-23 . KArlton Smith .............................................................................................:_:.._._........:....._................ Washington,. DC, United States ._ .... ...-_............... ..... 2014-11-23 Johnathan Jacobowitz _,............................ Pittsburgh, PA, United-States ....................................... 2014-11-23 Walter Kane Homewood, IL, United States 2014-11-23 . Merry Imel Virginia Beach, VA, United States 2014-11-23 concetta woelfel - Henrico, VA, United States . , 2014-11-23. Grace Joyce . Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-24 Virginia Del Rosario Cupertino,: CA, United. States 2014711-24,. Joe Zheng = Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-24 Chris Cheng Cupertino, CA, United States .......... ........... 2014-11-24 - Shawn Yang : - - Cupertino,, CA, United' States .......... _........... . ..2014-11 r24 Zhuru Zhang :Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-24 Andy Yang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-24 Shweta Goyal Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-1:1-24 Alan Lambert Gibsonburg, .OH, United States 2014-11-24 Krishna Garg : Jaipur, India; AL, United States ......I.. .......... 2014-11-24 Brian McKenna Levittown, NY, United States 2014-11-24 Angela Gentry Fort Worth, TX, United States 2014-11-24 Martin Frazier Orlando, FL,. United :States 2014-1,1-24 Corey Cohn White:Plain% NY; United States ........... ....... 2014-11-24 Carrie Davis Bangor, ME, United States 2014-11-24 Andrea Blinn . Pittsburgh, PA,.United States 2014-11-24 Cheryl Dillon Auburn, NY; United. States ................. 20.14-11-24 April Hardin Lexington, KY,. United States .... .. ... 2014-11-24 Name Location Date Vincent Ciccone Pittsburgh, PA, United States 2014-11-24 Randy Holtan Rochester, MN, United States 2014-11-24 jackie runkles Puyallup, WA, United States 2014-11-24 Jean Satisfield Alexandria, VA, United States 2014-11-24 Yvette Calderon Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-11-24 Sandra Ah Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-24 Sailaja Vellanki Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-24 Wei Jia Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-24 James kuehnis Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-24 Wei -Yu Chang San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-24 Yan Zhang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-24 Diane Doss Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-11-24 Darren lee Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-24 Deepak PATIL Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-24 zhenjiang Ii San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-24 Mayukha Vallabhaneni Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-24 Michael Trepp Seattle, WA, United States 2014-11-25 William Kempf Evansville, IN, United States 2014-11-25 Mr and Mrs Richard N Huff Fort Wayne, IN, United States 2014-11-25 Ravi Narayana Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-25 Rajini Rajanna Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-25 Alex Mayers Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-25 Deepthi Ganti Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-25 Narendran Sithambaram Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-25 Jingchun Zhang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-25 Nick Ochoa Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-25 Viral Munshi Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-25 Shengoang Fan San jose, CA, United States 2014-11-25 Tina Hsu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-25 Connie Louh Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-25 Naomi Shisaike Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-25 Meena Dhomse Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-25 Name Locai�on Date yan liu .............................._.......................................... {A,'.United. States ................................ ................ -.11............................ Qing Ye San Jose, CA, United States 2014-11-25. gitaa rayanker ' . ............... .......... ._.............................._.... Cupertino, CA,' United States _...__. _ .. _ :......_..__ ,: _ .... -. __ . __ .. _ , ...._ >2014-1125 ........................................................... .............. ......._......_.. Rajmohan.MurugaN Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-1125 Eva Mei Cupertino, CA,United States ................ .............................. .._ .. ......... ........ _..... 2014-11-25 ...... .._.......................... .. _..................._......._........_.............._ _.............. Chengguang,Shi ......... ._.._... Cupertino, CA,.United States ... ..........._. 2014-11-25 Param.Connur ' . .......... ........... ._ .........._....._ Cupertino, CA, United States .._..._ _ :. __._.....___.. ...... ..:,..:.......... .._..................... 2014=11-25 ...... ......._............ ................ ...._ _....._........._............ .. Lisa Chen �- t� : ;` CA, United States 2014.11-25 Sanjeev Sahni ' Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-25 Santosh Hambir ' Cupertino,' CA; United States 2014-11-25 Jane Cao Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-26 Suzanne CumineCupertino, CA, United States 2014-11=26 William Lau Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-26" Deepa Balgi' San Francisco; CA, United States 2014-11-26'1 Iris Gorgen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11=26 Hong Him Lira Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-26 Tracy,Hurt Santa Clara,`CA, United States 2014-11-26 Young Kue ...... ... .............. Fresno, CA; United States , ................... ......... ....... . _:..._....... ........ ..................................... .._. 2014-11-26 _......:..::..._............... ...I.................. ._ Donna.Yuen San Jose, CA, United States I..... ............. ... 2014-11-27, shuk tsuileung San-Jose,'-CA, United States 2014-11-27 Manju Abraham Cupertino, CA, United, States 2014-11-27 Reshma Zachariah Cupertino, CA, 'United' States 2014-11=27 Karen Y Santa Clara,�CA, United States 2014-11-27 John Ho Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-28- Ramgopal Tanikella Cupertino; CA; United, States 2014-11-28 Padmaja Penumarthy __ ............................._ ..............................-.. Cupertino, CA, United States -... _.............. _.......... ........................................ _........ .....__................_............._.._ 2014-11-28' . ........ Perry Luo Cupertino; CA, United States ......... ............. . 2014-11-28 Shitanshu Shah Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-28= Richard Sawabe Cupertino, CA, `United States 2014-11-29 Neil Evangelista Cupertino; CA, United States . 2014-11=29 David'Robinson ._...........................__.__...... 'Cupertino, CA, United- States ...... .... .._................................................. ............... '201.4-11-29 ........ ........_........_............... .._ CHINGPING KANG ....._..... Cupertino, CA,'United States _.........:.............._I........ .... ............_._ _. 2014-11-29 Name Location Date Jayanthi Srinivasan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-29 Mindy Wong Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-29 Pamela Robinson Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-29 Jane Y Lin Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-29 Lora Rabbitt-Feller Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-29 Aseem Vaid Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-11-30 Peggy Griffin Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 Siva Kondapi Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 Santhi Santhanagopalan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 Hemali Sutaria Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 richard chang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 Ray Hung Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 Binuraj Ravindran Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 Sharmila Ranka Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 MATHEW THOMAS Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 Mitra Lele Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 sunita murthy Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 Paul Ayers Madison, MS, United States 2014-11-30 rocky randy gelderland, Netherlands 2014-11-30 Ananda Kumar gajula Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 Chris Huang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 Sanjay sharma Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 Sharon Wu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 ed auch Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 Rina Sinha Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 MARIE MANHARDT park ridge, IL, United States 2014-11-30 patricia fisk campbell, CA, United States 2014-11-30 Jeffrey Lin Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 Hesham Abuelata Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 Nadia Aboushanab Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-11-30 Atul Tulshibagwale Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Cuc pham Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Ashwin Ramanathan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 ....... .. _ . ........... Liza Sviridova ; ............. ...... ......... . Sunnyvale,:CA, United States _,.. 2014-12-01 . ..__ ::., .I ........................ .. Vivek Koppuru ............ ... ......,.. Cupertino, CA, United States ............... ... _.... ..... ............ 2014-12-01 . ..... ..... Zachariaf Yang ....... _....... ........... ...... .... Cupertino, CA,"United States .__,._..................... 2014-12-01 lilac cadouri Cupertino; CA, United States . 2014-12-01 ..... ................ . _. Tiffany Ju Y ........................_......_.... ......... ...... _ . ........... .............. Cupertino, CA, United States P . ........ . 2014-12-0 1 ._ Jonathan JiangSan .__.. ............ Jose, CA, United States __.... . .__.. .., .. 2014-12-01 ...... .....I....... .... ........... Gayatri Sabne ._...... .......................... Cupertino, CA, United States ............ .,._.. ... 2014-12-01, ....... ........... Neela Venkat Cupertino, CA, United'States 2014-12-01 ......................... _ ,........ Lokesh Narayan ..... ............... ..... ....................... _.... Cupertino, CA, United States ....... ... 2414-12-01 ........... ..................... Ameera Mungale ......................... . Cupertino, CA, United States _, ._........ ........... 2014-12-01 ............ .. , Krishna Kumar- Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 ....:....:....:......... . ............. ............. Sakshi Srivastava --_.. _ .....,................, Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 .. ........ I......... ........ ....... ... tommy cheng : .................... .................. _ .................. ....._.............. Cupertino, CA, United States ................. . .. 2014-12-01 ........ lisa Feng _.............. ........... ............ Cupertino, CA, United States _...... .............. .... ................ 2014-12-01 Jun Chang .... ... ...... Cupertino, CA, United States ................................................... 2014-12-0Y ...................................... Juchien Lin Cupertino; CA, United States ................ 201.4-12-01 ..................... ......... ___. Aaron Carroll = .........p......... Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 ..... .... .......... . _ ........ Ling Willis ........ ......... ........... ..._ ... _ ................. Cupertino, CA, United States .................. .......... 2014-12-01 ......... ping chen , " p ........ .................................................. Cupertino, CA, United States ... , . 2014-12-01 .... Tsunglun Yu .......... .... _ .. .......... ....... ..................... Cupertino, CA; United States . . 2014-12-01 ..... Shi Chen - Cup ertino, CA, United States ...... 2014=12-01 .......... _._........ __ ......_ Xiaoshan- Chen _ . Cupertino,. CA, United States ......... 2014-12-01 . ........ ............... ... _ .......................... Cailan Shen ...... Cupertino, CA,'United States .. .......... . 2014-12-01 _ . ... _ _,. ...... Evelyn Jiang .. ..... ....... .......... Cupertino, CA,'United States _......._. . 2014-12-01 Sophia Chen ' ' ._._ ... Cupertino,,CA, United States _................... _......., . 2014=12-01 ... __........... .. ._ ................. . Songping Wu ` __ _....... _ ......... ........ __. _ . Cupertino, CA; United States ...... 2014-12-01 .............. Janice Chen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Vid a Tiru ' ......... ..... ....... ..................... San Jose, CA, United'States ........... 2014-12-01 Maxine Chan Cupertino, ertino, CA,'United States 2014-12-01 ..... ............. Omprasad Vaikuntam ............ ................. .. San Jose, CA; United States 2014-12-01 Xianda Ma Cupertino, CA, United States 2014=12-01 . Name Location Date Rohit kumar Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Yinhong Chen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Deepti Mohta Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Boyuan Zhang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Ray Fang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Parker Li Urbana, IL, United States 2014-12-01 Richard Mao Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Althea Roy EI Centro, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Lenny Litvinyuk Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Joshua Cheung Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Vik Waghray Berkeley, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Eugene Pak Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Maggie Cai San Jose, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Sol Kim Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Ankita Upadhyay Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Monica Oh Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Anton Abramson San Jose, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Victor Chen San Jose, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Luke Chui Los Altos, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Joseph Zhang San Jose, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Celeste Jin Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Djash Mahuab Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Stephen McCabe Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 David Shen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Derek Hu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Farica Carroll Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Disha Bendre Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Vivian Le Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Jeesoo Kim Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Priya ganta Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Josephine Kraemer Belmont, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Jeremy Walker Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 ,Name ° Location Date Annie Yang Newport Beach, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Yanhua Yi Cupertino, CA,..United States 2014-12-01 Angela Xian Cupertino, CA, United.States 2014-12-01., Samantha Tam Cupertino; CA, United States 2014-12-01 Yu-wen Tsou tri ' , CA, United States 2014-12-01 Eric- Sun Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 .: Kui Xu Cupertino,. CA, United States 2014-12-01 wenhua yang Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12=01:.: Chien Lin Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-01 Jen Ho Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Amber Li Cupertino, CA, United States . 2014-12-02. Sira Sudhindranath San.Jose, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Monika Shah. Cupertino; CA, _United States 2014-12-02 Sen Vel Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Deepak Khanna Santa Clara, _CA, United States 2014-12-02 Yan Zhang Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014.12-02-. Yong Ma Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Huijuan Li Cupertino., CA, United States ....... .............. 2014-12-02 Yuyu Yan San Jose.,; CA, United States 2014-12-02 Qingzhu Song_. : Cupertino, CA,- United States 2014-12-02 .....: ......:............._ . jianli fan .....:_ ........... _.._ _ .. _.... Cupertino, CA, United States : 2014-12-02 Stephen hsieh Cupertino,. CA, United States 2014-12-02 Wen jia San jose, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Xiang Wu, Cupertino,,�CA, United States 2014-12-02, Sherry Li- Cupertino, CA, United States ....... 2014-12-02 Amy Liu Sunnyvale, CA, United .States 2014-12-02 Amy Wu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014712-02 Jason xing Cupertino, CA, United,States ............. 2014-.12-02 Jin Cui Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Irwin Hui Los Angeles, CA, United States 2014-12-02 - , Donna Lee . Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02. Adelina Mintz Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Name Location Date ziyue yu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Li Li Sunnyvale, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Shuying Chen (*tr, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Kevin Hu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Yao ching Liu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Shuyi Chen Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Lucia Garcia Collinsville, IL, United States 2014-12-02 michele king port orchard, WA, United States 2014-12-02 margi shah Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Joan Yuan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Rachel Mandelbaum No, MA, United States 2014-12-02 Jorge Trevino Sanford, FL, United States 2014-12-02 Yun Peng San Jose, CA, United States 2014-12-02 peter polaczek New York, NY, United States 2014-12-02 Doran Whisman Reno, NV, United States 2014-12-02 Claire Saxton Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Anne Ling Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Angelee Winn Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Jackie Yau Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 VINEET GUPTA Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Hannah Sung Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Joonhee Lee Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Bambi Nguyen Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Avani Vaid Santa Clara, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Christina Yuan Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Xiaotian Wu ' tr ' , CA, United States 2014-12-02 Saahiti Jasti Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Zain Umerani Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Evan Sparhawk Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Christina Tao Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Yin Chen Lu ' trg ' , CA, United States 2014-12-02 Jennifer Van Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Name;: Location Date Rebekkah Scharf ......... ......... .......... .:..................__ _..._................_......_.................... Santa Cruz, CA, United States _„_,_ .......... --.............._ ._ ................. 2014-12-02 Karen C ............ ........ ............................................................................... San Jose, CA, United States _................................................ ......... ................................... _...... ...................... ................... ........ 2014-12-02 ............................................. Kathleen Yu .......... ... I.... I.... ...._. _ .................................. Cupertino, CA, United States ......................... .................... _.-- ........... .... _..._.............................. ............. 2014-12-02 .._.......... ...... I..... ..._ ........................_. Mark Chang _-............................. ............................ _. ..........................__ Taipei, Taiwan ............................_............................................................................... 2014-12-02 Sylvia Tseng ..........................._--- ...... ...................... ............................... . Cupertino, CA, United States .....__..... ..... ................ _ _....... ...................................................... ....... .................. 2014-12-02 Appaji Malla ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... San Jose, CA, United States ........... .............. ..... I...................... 2014-12-02 David Tung _.............................................._............................................ Sunnyvale, CA, United States _ ........ I... .... 11,....................... ............ 2014-12-02 Sam nakhjavani ...................................................................................................I........... Cupertino, CA, United States ....... ........ ............................ ........ --- ....... ...... .... ........................... .......... 2014-12-02 Xing Han .- ... -._____ _ .................._ ........................... .......... ..................................................... Cupertino, CA, United States ____ ...................._............. _ ... .......... . 2014-12-02 Stella Huang ..... .........I.................. ...... ....... .......................... Sunnyvale, CA, United States ........... .......................................... ....... ............................. .... ......... 2014-12-02 Prateek Joshi _ .......... .............. ......... San Jose, CA, United States _ __. _.... _ _ .............._..... ................................ ................... ..... 2014-12-02 Cheri Smith _.................... ...... ...._ _ .. ............................__ .......................... Louisville, KY, United States . ---_.......... ... ........ ........... ............ ............. _........................ .. ................. ............ 2014-12-02 ............................. Neelima Cherukuru ---- ............... ......... ............................... ....... ........................... Cupertino, CA, United States ---- ............ ........-.............. ............. ........................... ............ .................. .................. 2014-12-02 ........................ Dharma Naidu ..... Cupertino, CA, United States ...... ................................ 2014-12-02 Xiaoli He .............. ..__._........ _...._......... _ San Jose, CA, United States _......... ..... .................... ..... .............................. _---- ... ... ......... ................................................................... 2014-12-02 Kishore Kasamsetty .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Max Yang Cupertino, CA, United States ..................... ........... I........ ............ 2014-12-02 Pui chen ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 Li Yu Cupertino, CA, United States 2014-12-02 change®org Cupertino Residents Recipient: Letter: Greetings, Say NO to re -zoning the commercial sites in Cupertino Comments Name Location Date Comment Sushma Shirish Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 1 am against over development of cupertino. Our schools and roads are already overcrowded Sunil Satnur Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 We are looking at close to 1400 condos combined between Hamptons, RoseBowl, Vallco, Main St and United. Too much overcrowding on Wolfe and Jinming Gu Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 the schools in the middle part of Cupertino. Please spread the development elsewhere. Huaying Cheng Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 -- Because of traffic congestion, school quality, existing housing density, we Peiling Yao Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 strongly oppose the following sites being considered for potential housing Shirish Seetharam Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 development: site 7/1_7 United Furniture/east of E. Estates. Anne Ezzat Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 -Maximum building height must be under 45 feet for all city housing, commercial or mixed use units. Henry Choi Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 I'm a resident right next to United Further. sonal tele Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 1 dont want valloo mall to shut down because my daughter goes to the ice rink at the mall. Its a big convenience to have the ice rink so close to home. Xinhua Wang Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Affect traffic and school. Howen Chen Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Does our cupertino council know they are gradually destroying our peaceful city? Fang Zhu Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Too much load for cupertino Prabal Bhattacharya Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 I'm against rampant development without balance. The proposed developments at Vallco and United Furniture would make my already crowded neighborhood packed even more with people and cars, not to mention the chaos all this construction would create. Jinming Gu Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Don't want the high density class in school. Hope to keep current quiet community. Shilpa Vir Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 This re -zoning affects my city negatively Peiling Yao Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Traffic & local resource are limited. Shirish Seetharam Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Negatively impacts our city Anne Ezzat Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Because all of the development on Cupertino has been on one side of Highway 85, and the schools suffer from overcrowding. Given the boom and bust cycle of technology, it is foolish to over develop. Saravanakumar tiruthani Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 We need to grow Cupertino in a balanced way. The current plan to re zone commericial properties skews the growth towards more housing. The re zoning proposal is motivated by short term thinking to capitalize on spikes in housing prices. Any re zoning should be preceded by a solid plan to expand existing roads and schools that are already congested Oust recently a teenager on bike was hit by a truck). Edita Tejnil Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Rezoning does not make sense without corresponding development of services in the city (schools, supermarkets, etc.) and of infrastructure to alleviate traffic congestion Ayoub Hashemi Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Already we have very heavy traffic in this area and no plan how to fix this. Vidya Raman Sunnyvale, CA 2014-11-05 1 am moving to Cupertino and have school age kids. This is going to be a big problem. Hari Narayanan San Jose, CA 2014-11-05 1 live in Cupertino and want it to be a good place for bringing up children Name Logtiog Date Comment Tervie.Leung , Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 -1 love in Cupertino and.do wantto•see more crowding of school and congestion Mike Rohrs Cupertino; CA 2014-11-05 ' There is no enough infrastructure to support all this growth. Jeffrey Lowe Cupertino, CA of traffic!! Patricia Coppe Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Traffic'impact Hari Narayanan Cupertino, CA- 2014711-05 Cupertino is a great place for people of all kinds because of its balance Obviously, there are not enough infrastructure and schools developments to between business and residential property. Skewing this balance will cause schools will just get worse. Tammy Mongelli Sunnyvale, CA over -crowding, traffic congestion, less safety for children. Eric Yang Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Way too many new/additional residential units will drastically alter the City pollution. Kuimeuy Wang San Jose, CA landscape for the future of this City. yu ying cupertino, United States 2014-11-05 As a cupertino resident of 7+ years, I am strongly againt the 1800+ residential dangers - pollution, etc. ...... sonali padgaonkar cupertino, CA . constructions around the 0.5 square mile near the Vallco Mall. Without doubt, Sriram Natarajan Cupertino, CA .. .. ............ ........ ............ 2014-11=05 Safety,' Ying Yan Santa Clara, CA introducing 7000+ new residents will add overwhelming burden to current „ commercial place. It will create a point of traffic jam, potential crime and crazy traffic, limited police/firedepartment crew and crowded schools. ............ Prasad Narayana Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Children safety is paramount importance and should be taken into account before re -zoning areas. Please do not re -zone commercial sites. I love the city of cupertino for its family friendly, safe, quiet community. I love to see if grows as it attracts more and more decent people to live in and to contribute the community. But this new condo construction plan doesn't seem to lead the city to the right direction. Mike Rohrs Cupertino; CA 2014-11-05 ' There is no enough infrastructure to support all this growth. Jeffrey Lowe Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 [live next to Miller Ave and the result of the rezoning will cause traffic congestion and add perhaps hours to my daily commute. Seema Gupta Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 1 do not want city to be overcrowded. ._ Chunhua Li Cupertino, CA ...... . .:. ......... _....... . ., 2014 -it -05 Do not agree with the proposal of rezoning of sites. .:........ .:• .. _............. -....,.- ................................................ ,.,;.,..:.. mony.LORACH . cupertino, CA . ..................... .... ..................... 201.4-11-05 . tam very concerned about the well being of Cupertino residents and children. Obviously, there are not enough infrastructure and schools developments to support the planned constructions. The current traffic and the overcrowded schools will just get worse. Tammy Mongelli Sunnyvale, CA 201441-05 This affects traffic and congestion in Sunnyvale and surrounding cities Kumar Subramani CUPERTINO, CA ............... 2014-11-05 1 live in`this beautiful city and hate to see commercialization, increase traffic congestion, crowded schools, fewer park space (denser) and above all pollution. Kuimeuy Wang San Jose, CA 2014-11-05 'This is a safety issue. It is also a quality of life. ' I moved here to enjoy what it has to offer - easy access to schools, stores, great community. Too big is not always good as it increases traffic and probability of accidents and, other dangers - pollution, etc. ...... sonali padgaonkar cupertino, CA . ___........... .,.......... .__................ • 2014-11-05- Cupertino needs remain a cozy small city Sriram Natarajan Cupertino, CA .. .. ............ ........ ............ 2014-11=05 Safety,' Ying Yan Santa Clara, CA 2014-11-05 We live close by and we love the residential area it is. Don't change it to a pure „ commercial place. It will create a point of traffic jam, potential crime and uncomfortable living and working place for every one. ............ Prasad Narayana Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Children safety is paramount importance and should be taken into account before re -zoning areas. Please do not re -zone commercial sites. Name Location Date Comment Greg S. Cupertino, United States 2014-11-05 Traffic & safety is already a huge concern in Cupertino with the existing office buildings, the upcoming new Apple campus, and is going to get worse when all the new construction is finished. The fact of the matter is, Cupertino roads, schools & infrastructure are simply not ready to accommodate an even larger expansion to the number of residents & office workers. Dropping off children at any of our schools is already a nightmare, and the recent tragic accident goes to show just how severe the problem is becoming. Additionally, construction traffic from all the simultaneous developments is becoming a huge concern and nuisance in and of itself. Once again, the recent tragedy is a clear indication that the level of construction traffic we're at today is simply dangerous - please don't make it even worse! Veronica Law Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Where is the budget to enhance school, parks, city services, traffic control to support all these new residents? Martina Herhusky Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 too many apartments in the same section of town that will impact traffic and schools. chen Ben Asher Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 The city was pushing to mush development that changing our life which I dont agree. I want to see more parks, open spaces, play grounds, walking trails etc Kimber graham Santa Clara, CA 2014-11-05 My kids attend Cupertino schools. Biking to school is extremely dicey as traffic is quite impacted. This problem is sure to increase dramatically when the new Apple headquarters open. Construction of Apple and the permanent closure of Pruneridge Rd. from Tantau to Wolf has had an extraordinarily negative impact on traffic patterns in surrounding neighborhoods. When 12,000 employees begin working at Apple it's going to be a nightmare. Let's be smart and not add more residents and cars to this equation. Vishakha Stein Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Cupertino is already overbuilt. It is reducing the quality of life for current residents like us and we need to stop packing houses in every little corner we see. Joel Adam Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 traffic is already bad on stevens creek and wolfe/miller roads, these additional residences will make things worse Christine Jacobs Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 The qtet uality of both life and schools in cupertino will suffer if we trade sales tax producers for high density housing Greg Young Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 There is too much growth in Cupertino. The quality of life is going down hill. We don't need more housing. shanshan Liu Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Daily Life Ishita Acharya Saratoga, CA 2014-11-05 Kids go to Cupertino schools whihc are severely impacted B. T Sunnyvale, CA 2014-11-05 Cupertino is already too crowded. Schools and traffic/safety are at risk. xuemei lou cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Cupertion is too congested now. Zana Wilkie Santa Clara, CA 2014-11-05 Traffic congestion has increased significantly along Stevens Creek in the past 2 years. Frequently the Lawrence Expressway exit north off 280 backs up nearly to the Saratoga onramp. You can see the numerous skid marks showing how people are caught unaware of this increase in traffic. Janice Leier Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Overcrowding. Traffic congestion Name .:: Location Date Comment Eddie Chen cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 1 moved to Cupertino for a certain quality of life and environment for my kids and family. Traffic is already so bad that that sometimes I'm waiting 5 minutes to turn left onto Blaney, and spending a crazy 35 minutes to commute to santa clara for work. Schools are already full and we are at risk to lose a certain ... . .... ........ . .... ... ... _.. ......... _..._. atmosphere about our town if we suddenly bring in that many bulk residences. __._........ _ .. .. ............_. _.. Laurie Robell Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 1 am concerned about the impact of more apartment housing on schools and traffic congestion. We don't seem to have a good plan already for the Apple Campus, Main Street & other recent apartments. Plus this brings in little additional city or school revenue. I know we need to revitalize Vallco, but I want _. _ ....... ........:.. _.....•...._..__..................._..._............. to be careful about what we put there instead. _................. ................................ ... ......... ....... .. ... .... ............. .... ......... Victoria Lau Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 1 do not agree with the large amount of housing units that the city wants to add. I feel it will negatively impact the traffic, safety, parks and schools in Cuperitino and as a resident who pays a hefty property tax, I did NOT sign up to live in a ...... ...._..... ..... .. ..._.... city inundated with apartments, condos and townhouses! ..................... __.._ .... _.__. ..... ..........._ ..... _ ........ Ruth Stevens Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 Cupertino is overpopulated, which is putting a strain on our streets and schools. Just because land is available it doesn't mean we should fill it with ... ......... .......... ........... houses/condos/townhouses. Stop this madness!! .......:.... ................ .. ...... .... _.._._: ..... ......... .. ...... ...... .. ...................... Cathy Mack Cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 1 like Vallco. I walk there every week to eat at Fresh Choice and to shop at Penny's, Sear's, or one of the smaller shops. Please consider current _........_..._..._.._....._.._.__..._ residents needs (I've lived in Cupertino for 23 years now). ........ ................. .... ............ ......... I .......... .... .... __.............. Wayne Xin Santa Clara, CA ... _._.. ............... . _ ..... 2014-11-05 avoid getting too crowded in Cupertino schools _•... ......__. ...... .......... ._............ ...... .... .......__..... _ ....... .. Cathy campo cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 CUSD is already over burdened with the number of students. In the 1990s, state law was passed for 20:1 ratio of students:teacher for grades K-3. Several years ago CUSD started and continues not to follow this law and instead pays a fine. Please have CUSD follow the law by building more schools so there is more space to house the current students. Schools in FUHSD have very full classrooms currently too. Most of the buildings already have a 2nd story and still not enough classroom space for the current students. Another high school and middle school are needed immediately to handle the current population. Possibly consider changing back Creekside park or another park back into a school as it was not too long ago. Also I don't know if the impact on traffic and parking has been investigated with the formation of any of these new housing projects. Already there are issues with parking by the library and nearby apartments. The apartments across from JC Penney stated they did not build enough parking for the residents, and surely no parking for visitors. Please increase the amount of parking available for these current projects. Will there also be increases in the number of fire stations, fire personnel and police personnel which will be needed to care for the increased population? I am very concerned about these questions and other questions posed by residents. Let's _............._....... .... .... .. keep Cupertino a well managed city. _ .............:_._. _ .... .................. .....:- yan feng cupertino, CA 2014-11-05 This rezoning will cause traffic jam and potentially endanger those kids who ride bike to school ........ _........ . ........ Li Cao Cupertino, CA _.... ......_..._ _..... ...._ ......... ....I.... ........_..._ ... ... ......... ............., ..... __,... ..., .......... 2014-11-05 Because I live in Cupertino and I care about the community. __..__...... .... _ . _.. _ .......__......__............ . I. I.... _ _. William Shipman Cupertinoi, CA _....... .... . . .1.1 ................. _.. 2014-11-05 Too much traffic, overwhelmed schools, insufficient emergency services, not enough parking space. We are overwhelmed with existing redevelopment in progress. Please do not aggravate the situation with this proceed plan. Name AMANDA HUANG Vaitheesh Kolady Carrie OLeary Anupama Bandi Dennis Yen Dino COPPE Kevin Cheong Jill Gutierrez Location Date Comment CUPERTINO, CA 2014-11-05 One of the responsibilities of the City Council is to take care of the residents on Janey Lien their quality of the life in City of Cupertino. With the high housing value, and 2014-11-06 the substantially high property tax, we, as the resident, should receive the high Umesh Mahindra quality of the living. The over developed projects are putting us in the revers 2014-11-06 direction. It will cause more negative impact on traffic which is already bad, and the education quality as well. Please LISTEN and STOP all the new development projects. Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 1 live in Cupertino and I don't want this beautful town to be over crowded. I feel 2014-11-06 this city is already crowded. Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 Research shows that children do best in a school with a population cap that 2014-11-06 allows them to be known by the staff. This is true for students across the K - Sunjay Mohan High School years. Stocklmeier School is an example of the overcrowding that 2014-11-06 has made children anonymous on a Cupertino campus - with over 1100 Yunqing Shi children at one elementary school site! I don't want to see the rest of Cupertino 2014-11-06 schools overrun with children, who will be underserved, in order for developers Yao-Ning Huang to enrich themselves. Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 1 live in Cupertino. I am afraid new housing with cause congestion, overcrowd schools and drain the limited resources the city has. cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 Rezoning for listed sites will severely impact the neighborhood traffic and quality of living. Both Stevens Creek and De Anza have gridlock traffic during commute hours and the proposed new development will only make the situation worse. CUPERTINO, CA Cupertino, CA Santa Clara, CA Priya Ananthanarayanan Cupertino, CA Kaushal Varshney Santa Clara, CA Clement Nappoly Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 Traffic situations need to be improved before additional vehicles impact our already congested streets. 2014-11-06 Overcrowding, traffic congestion, health hazard 2014-11-06 We live on the Cupertino border and our children attend Cupertino Schools. More housing impacts the quality of education and the quality of life our family will have. It's too crowded already. Other districts can improve their schools instead of allowing more people to populate our already too full schoolsl 2014-11-06 1 want Cupertino to remain a high value and not a high density neighborhood. Schools will also suffer with more residences. 2014-11-06 Densely populated RENTAL complexes overcrowd schools because such residential complexes do not provide continuous funding to school district due to PLAIN FOOLISH Tax code. This also overcrowd roads and public infrastructure, for which there is no way to generate revenue for local development agencies for same reason. 2014-11-06 1 am signing this because I worry about the safety of my kids. Besides, this is a nice residential neighborhood. I don't want it to be polluted with apartments Janey Lien San Jose, CA 2014-11-06 Please do not overcrowd our schools! Umesh Mahindra Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 1 am signing this petition to avoid over crowding of our neighborhood and schools. Ravi Narula Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 Kids safety and rat too congested residential streets Stephen Leung Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 Cupertino schools/streets are already way too crowded. Sunjay Mohan Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 Balanced growth is what is needed. Yunqing Shi Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 It makes our neighborhood too crowded. Yao-Ning Huang San Jose, CA 2014-11-06 We're in Cupertino School District. Name Location Date Comment Wendy lu Sunnyvale, CA 2014-11-06 to avoid too many new residences, traffic, school need... Irtan Presswala Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 1 live near the United Furniture site and don't want construction which will bring __ -.. ....... _, ........... .11.1.1 noise, pollution and traffic. ................. .. .1 .... ...... .... . ... ........ __ ... .,...... jaya kothule Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 Traffic congestion. Poor air quality. Longer, drive time. Road rage on homestead.cars honking, impatient drivers running red light so they do not have to stay for longer red light. Drivers cursing.overcrowding of schools. High rents. Teachers stretched thin. Poor academic results.Students struggling to _. _.._... ......... ....... ........1......111 get access to amenities. Less involved in studies. _- . ._...._,.. ......._._ ....1....... Manju Datta Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 Schools are already overcrowded, with insufficient funds; traffic conditions will .............. _........ _1111... - _:.-........................... worsen, Cupertino will lose its attraction as a good place to live and work. .. ....._........ __ ............. Jin-Ho Tan .. _ ... ........................ Palo Alto, CA ............ ..... 2014-11-06 1_111. ....._........ 1 work in Cupertino _ ... _..... .......... _......... . Katherine Wang �7�, CA 2014-11-06 The traffic now in the area is already seriously congested, please give our current residence room to live an OK life, or else, the area will squeeze _...._...............__ ._......__....,... _1111..._................... everyone out of Bay Area finally!! ...... .__ ........ ..............1111. _....:.... . . ......1111 _... Jennifer Hu Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 1 don't want traffic congestion, I don't want to keep paying more property tax for .......___............ more class rooms _ 1111..__ Wencheng Su __ ....................._ Cupertino, CA ...............__..... 2014-11-06 _ .................._.. _.. _111_1.. ......... ... .......... There are already explosive construction in this area. Impact on our daily will .- _... become very significant. _.. _._.. 1111 .............. _1111. _ _.................... Susan cheah Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 NO to Ye-zoning the commercial sites in Cupertiino !! Our neighbor is already too crowded 1!! We will not live peacefully with more ..... new housing III ... ... ..................._........-_.. _.. ............ _ .......... ... ... . Chen Wang __.. ........_ san jose, CA ._ _ 2014-11-06 .._.......... I...... ...111 LIVING QUALITY!!!! .............. 1_.................._.... ........ ... ......_ 111 1-. _11 11......... .... ...... Qi Qiu Cupertino, CA ................................ 2014-11-06 ............... We do not want more crowded streets, schools, and parking lots. .. 1111.. __ .. 1111 . .. Lizhen zheng Santa Clara, CA 2014-11-06 ...- .. 1111 .._ ._........_ ...... Concerned about traffic, school capacity, student safety. Zhibiao Zhao _1111.. ........... I.I.. ............_._ Cupertino, CA 1111_.. - . _1111..._ ....._.....:...._ ..... . 2014-11-06 ......... _ ................ _.................. _... _ _... ...... .. ......... 1111. 1 1 11 _........ This is crushing the beautiful city of Cupertino. __.. ,._..__ _........... - Xiangdong Qiu Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 __ .... ...... 1.... ... 1... 1111..,. ........ . 1 am signing because rezoning will further overload the community and reduce _ .......... ......... ..... quality of life and education in Cupertino _ . . . ......... _.. .......... ......_ 1111... . Erica Chien Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 NO NO. NO more new apartment! It just lower Cupertino city level Quan Yuan Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 ............._._ .......... ......... .... ..__... concern about traffic and school overflow _. 1111... Su!k! Poon ................................ Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 ................................ _......... .. .. 1111._ .......1111. . It will increase in class size for the Cupertino public school systems. Sanjib Guha ......-11 1 1 ......... Cupertino, CA ...111 1.., ._.......,,. 2014-11-06 ...... Lessen overcrowding and congestion on Cupertino's neighborhood roads .......... ........... ,1..... 111_ ......... ..-. _ ...... .I.,.. I..... ., 11..,.......... ..1 1 ._ Shilpa Vibhakar Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 We area resident of this community. We do not want additional traffic problems in this area. New construction happening already will create many more issues that are still unknown. So definately new issues shall not be added at this point. _ 1111... ...... Thanks! ._._ ...... ......... Julie Pearson 1111... .. 1_.....111. Cupertino, CA _11.11.. 2014-11-06 _ __ ....._... ....... 11 .... .-1111-_1111... _....... ..... _._.......... 1 want people safe on the streets, sidewalks, and in their cars; I want to eliminate more horrible driving behavior that I see daily. _.-........ ......... ...-.-_........ ........................ ...11.......__._...1 Hong Ma Santa Clara, CA 2014-11-06 Wait to seethe impact of Apple office and main street. Then decide, please no rush. _1111_ __ _................... ......... .._...... ......... .......... _ ........... ... ... shida tan Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 Concerned about traffic _1111_ 1.111 ....... ...... ...... ... .... ........... _ ..... 11.........I...................... _ .......... . Liang-Fang Chao Cupertino, CA, 2014-11-06 Re -zoning will increase the size of schools and affect the quality of education that my kids receive. Re -zoning will increase traffic congestion and makes the road to school more dangerous. And the city of Cupertino did not effectively inform its residents of the General Plan and its impact. _..... .... .. . ........... 1111.. . .. .. .. 1111.. .. ... ......... Lu Chen Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 this area is already crowd enough. Name Location Date ' Comment Jenny Cheng Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 Traffic is horrible, schools are too crowded! ........... .__.._. ......... _.. Vidya Gundurao Cupertino, CA - 2014-11-06 Traffic concerns, quality of life ... .......... ... ...... __. ................. ..,........ _ . ... _......... .. ....... _ . .... .... Guogang Hu cupertino, CA .. .... ....I ... ..... .. .... . .......... .. .. 2014-11-06 Change zoning will impact all existing residents. .....__.. __......_ . ... .. ....... __........... .......... _............ ........... .... Betty Tang Cupertino, CA ... ............. .._. .. ...... _.... .... 2014-11-06 Please don't turn Cupertino into condo ghetto ... and give our kids a chance to ......................................... Cupertino, CA thrive in non-overcrowded schools! . .................. _.......... _ _... Stephanie Miller Cupertino, CA _....... ........ ................ 2014-11-06 I'm tired of the traffic and congestion Yu Hsueh Cupertino, CA 2014-11-06 Living here since 1997, what I have seen... traffic getting worse, mannered . ..................... Cupertino, CA getting worse, noise, dirty... Did I come here all for getting the worse and worse living conditions... For God's sake, please stop doing all the terrible damages. buildings, and pollution have adversely impact our living environment. I am Why you have to put all of them in the middle of the city central area?I Can you .... ............... . ..... fully control all the messy?! There are still a lot wide open area, like Stevens Creek Blvd cross Foothill Blvd... Please separate the crowded evenly, don't put all of them close tight to the kids and students area. Dawn Mortensen Santa Clara, CA 2014-11-06 Traffic is already crazy, and Apple hasn't yet moved in it's 14,000 new ............ ...... ..... ........ ............_._.. ._,.. employees. .... _...... .. _. __ .._ .... ........-.... ........ _....._ ._.... _. _ . savita chari Santa Clara, CA 2014-11-07 Please do not construct more homes and re-zone the existing homes. Already cupertino area is very congested and causes many accidents. We want our kids safe. Please don't jeopardize our kids' future by making risky and short- sighted decisions. Thanks! __.. ...... _... Ravi Ram San Jose, CA ...... ....I............. ............... 2014-11-07 1 don't want more traffic and crowded schools _. _. .. .._....._.........-.. .... ....... ....... ......... ... Koyeli Mukherjee Cupertino, CA ...._.._..-....... ... ....... ....... .. .......... 2014-11-07 Cupertino is already overcrowded. If more construction comes up there will be shortage of resoueces such as school, parking, road etc .. _...... .... .... .... _........ .._........................................... Lynn Yang Cupertino, CA _ 2014-11-07 In order for our children to have, if not as good as of now, but similar quality of not-too-crowded classroom, reasonably smooth traffic on all surface streets ... ... -.. -. etc. we must STOP re-zoning commercial area to build more housing. - _ ....... . .. _ .... ...... .. . . ... .... ........ ._.... ....... Natalie Fossen Cupertino, CA 2014-11-07 I'm signing because our schools are already over crowed. It's time to look at building more schools and putting our tax money into our kids vs. throwing up ......................... ........... more apartment buildings. ...-.-.__.......... .... .. 11 .... ... _ _................. ....... ....... ........................ ................. __.....__.._,......._..._. Dawn Kwok Cupertino, CA 2014-11-07 too crowded, school capacity has been max out _. .......-......_..__......, .. .... ......................................... _ ... _.. Chandrasekhar Cupertino, CA _ _..... -.. 2014-11-07 We bought the house at heavy price and start living here for the serene Mukherjee neighborhood, good school district, and availability of school for my sons. Now we have face a huge traffic, like a business school district and Cupertino will loose its ineluctable charm. I and my family are extremely unhappy and hugely concerned about this rampant development turning Cupertino into a concrete jungle with busrt of traffic all around. Please save Cupertino. . ...... _.. .... ...I ....... _ _. _ ..... ....... .... ._ ...... ... .... ... .._ . subramanian chebiyam sunnyvale, CA 2014-11-07 More congested means less safe for school kids. Cupertino is already crowded. _..............._.................... Phyllis Dickstein ........... _.... ........................I.. Cupertino, CA ........ ..... _. _. _......._ .. __.......... ..I.I....... ......... ...-..................... ....- 2014-11-07 Development needs to be kept in moderation, consonant with the environment, without undue traffic; it should not be overdone. Yuh-Juan Hung ,........._ Cupertino, CA 2014-11-07 Fallout level, dusty, air quality, lost interest in living in Cupertino _...... ......._... ................ _._.. ........... Eva Kashkooli ......................................... Cupertino, CA 2014-11-07 Traffic has gotten much worse in this area in recent years. It's dangerous for bicyclists and difficult for drivers to get in and out of our neighborhoods. _ __ _ ................. .-...._ .._............._....... ....... ............ __ Jocelyn Yeh . ..................... Cupertino, CA ............ 2014-11-07 1 have been a resident in this area since 2000. Traffic, crowd, newly developed buildings, and pollution have adversely impact our living environment. I am _ ........................ ... .... ............... . ..... absolutely supporting "NO MORE" commercial sites. .. ......... . ......... ..... _ _. _ ._ . - ... ._....... ....-......... _._..... ................ . Name Location Date Comment ', Michael Garvale Cupertino, CA 2014-11-07 Enough is Enoughl I have been a resident of Cupertino for 30 years and remember when the Cole Brothers feed store was on the comer of Stevens Creek and DeAnza. I'm all for progress and realize that you can't stop it some times. But there is no excuse for uncontrolled growth. All of us already feel the burden of traffic and congestion during rush hour. Has anyone living on Blaney tried to pullout of their driveway during this time? It's a nightmare) How many more students will it take before Cupertino schools becomes just another school district instead of a superior one? Where does it say in the city's charter that we are required to build on every square inch? Sure it means more taxes and revenue for the city, but at what cost? We have enough politicians in Washington that don't give a damn about us, we don't need anymore in Cupertino. There is strength in numbers, so I urge all of my fellow residents to sign the petition to show our displeasure with the city council and their shortsightedness. Don't let a tragedy happen with our kids and quality of life be the driving force to make the council realize they have made a huge mistake. _................ By then it's too late! ... _....... ....-......, _ ........... ... ... _.. .. ......... _ ............ Minoo Mehta Cupertino, CA ..... . 2014-11-07 Traffic and school crowding must be avoided, else quality of life will suffer. _................ .. - __..- _- ..... .... .._ _. ......... . ...._....... ..... _...._....... Hong Luo San Jose, CA 2014-11-07 The public facility is already limited. Li Chen Cupertino, CA 2014-11-07 Please think about the Cupertino residents. Stop re-zoning the commercial _...........-_...._......................................... sites in Cupertino. _.-...... ......_...... ............... _..... . ........ --- ......... ....... .. _....__....... ..... _ .... . Rohini Kashibatla Cupertino, United States 2014-11-07 Traffic is already bad. We don't need more traffic jams. Vaishnavi Sridhar Cupertino, CA 2014-11-07 Cupertino is already congested with traffic and we DO NOT want more traffic and pollution along Stevens Creek Blvd and De Anza Blvd. Our kids bike to their schools along these routes and it is already highly unsafe with the high volume of traffic. Already burdened schools will get over crowded, resources . . .. ... ... ... _.- will be stretched thin ... stop building! ...... ............. ....... ......__.. Xiao Zha Cupertino, CA ... .... .._......_ 2014-11-08 Say No to rezoning for cupertino cermmercial proposal. .... _....... _. _.. ............. ..._.........._ Keiko Black-Hogins Cupertino, CA 2014-11-08 Over -building enabled by zoning that is not properly'future-proofed' for .... __..._...._ ......._.... _ _.:.............. Cupertino will cause critical infrastructure overload ...... .. .... ....._.......... .......................... .............. ..... _. . bill black-hogins cupertino, CA _. _. _ ......... _ .... _ .......... _ _.-.__ 2014-11-08 Over -building enabled by poorly planned zoning is NOT a place for our future I! _.-..... _...... ...............................__...... ... ......_ ... ....... .. dorothy cheng cuptertino, CA 2014-11-08 Please see the traffic and school evnironment. I canot get out of house. The traff ice so bad cheungcheung cheng cupertino, CA __.... 2014-11-08 Too crowded and no high pressure ... .... ... _........... ......_ .._ ..... .,,.... _ ... ....... .. _ ......... .., .... .. ... ........., Sridhar Seshadh Cupertino, CA .. ....... ...... 2014-11-08 Traffic and over crowding of an already congested area _..... _ _ .. .........._ .............._ . ......-.. Vidya Venkataraghavan Cupertino, CA 2014-11-08 I'm concerned about the increase in traffic and the overcrowding to be _................. _._._.............._ expected in schools. .._ ... ......,....- .....,... .... ,....,. ................... _........ ......__ ....... steve herhusky cupertino, CA 2014-11-08 It would adversely effect the neighborhood schools and make traffic in the area horrible. It is already very had to exit our street on to Steven creek on school _ ... .......... _ _:., ... ......._ mornings. ........ ... _:.. _.. , ....._ ...._....__...._. _ _........._ .......... ......._.... .... _ ..._....... Tom MacDonald Cupertino, CA 2014-11-08 Since moving to Cupertino, I have seen a large number of residential units built. The streets have become more crowded. It seems that builders make great money, but infrastructure does not keep up. So builders make great money, and we suffer and/or pay for the infrastructure that is necessary to pay for their projects. Name Location Date Comment Edward Puccinelli Cupertino, CA 2014-11-08 1 do not support increasing the residential density of Cupertino. I am willing to accept a cutback in non-critical city services if this is a direct consequence of not increasing housing density. But 1 hope that one is not the sole cause of the other and that a good city government can continue to provide the excellent city James Shih Callahan, CA services we now enjoy without having to look to increase tax revenues by a Joe Chang Cupertion, CA continued increase in residential density or even by an increase in commercial Jing Liu Cupertino, CA density. Matangi Rajamani Cupertino, CA 2014-11-08 Our schools are overcrowded as it is, and our streets do not support getting Anna Black-Hogins San Luis Obispo, CA them there and back safely. Adding more residences will only increase school sundar narayanan cupertino, CA crowding and traffic congestions. We need neither. Deepika Kapil Cupertino, CA 2014-11-09 traffic congestion, kids and pedestrian safety, no parks alongside, no road expansions, neighborhood appeal, resources are limited John Tolan Cupertino, CA 2014-11-09 We have already seen the sharply increased traffic in town. The proposed re- zoning would greatly increase overcrowding and decrease everyone's quality of life Irene wang cupertino, CA 2014-11-09 My class too crowded. Traffic let me late class Helen L. Cole Trust San Jose, CA 2014-11-09 The schools are already overcrowded .... we do NOt need more high density Maria Mokrzycki Cupertino, CA housing in Cupertino! jon green Cupertino, CA 2014-11-09 This is an overdeveloped area of the city and we live in the middle of it. David Ma San Jose, CA 2014-11-09 1 am NOT against more housing in Cupertino. I believe more people should have the opportunity to live in this great place. However, the impacts to schools Peter Lee Cupertino, CA and traffic have not been adequately weighed, and until this happens, this project should not move forward. Huihui yong Cupertino, CA 2014-11-09 im signing because I don't support the proposal on rezoning the commercial sites. Adan Martinez Cupertino, CA 2014-11-10 More residences in this area will further stress the services in this city, which already has too much traffic, overcrowded schools, and not enough green space. The Valco area could be better used in offering more services to this part of Cupertino that is imbalanced and neglected compared to the western part. James Shih Callahan, CA 2014-11-10 I'm signing this petition because I am against re -zoning. Joe Chang Cupertion, CA 2014-11-10 Yes Jing Liu Cupertino, CA 2014-11-10 Cupertino is already quite crowded. I don't want to see heavier traffic on De Anza Blvd and more parked cars on the streets. Anna Black-Hogins San Luis Obispo, CA 2014-11-10 Cupertino is a suburb, stop trying to tum it into a city with all this chaos. sundar narayanan cupertino, CA 2014-11-10 my commute went from 20 minutes to 40 minutes on Bubb and de anza. we have a traffic problem thanks to apple at results way and we just had a kid die. the current residents are having a tough time getting out in the morning because more people are getting in to cupertino. we have not thought this through with the added influx of people coming in to work here w.r.t. traffic patterns and parking Hatem Fahmi Sunnyvale, CA 2014-11-10 1 live on the Sunnyvale/cupertino border and I'm suffering on a daily basis from the terrible traffic that we currently have Maria Mokrzycki Cupertino, CA 2014-11-10 City hall needs a better plan to deal with traffic, safety and overcrowding of schools before moving forward with more housing!11!! Bethany Stephan Phoenix, AZ 2014-11-10 Traffic is already ridiculous and dangerous in Cupertino. Adding more residential units will only make this worse. Peter Lee Cupertino, CA 2014-11-11 Too much development already. Name Locatlor Date Comment Ellen Kolstee Cupertino, CA 2014-11-11 1 care about living in a sustainable community. Bruce Nilo #document, CA 2014-11-11 1 live here and I feel that the growth plans are not well conceived _..,.... . ................. liz zhang cupertino, CA _...... ...... ..I....I. ......... 2014-11-11 Strongly against! _ ..__..... _.... ...I._... ._ ... ..... ...... ............. ................ _. ..................__. Pamela Hershey Cupertino, CA ...... _........................... 2014-11-11 1 agree 100% we are overcrowding our beautiful town!!! It has to stop ! NOW .......... .... _. _- ............................... ...... William Hershey Cupertino, CA 2014-11-11 1 was bom in San Francisco but I do not want to live there!!! I want to live in a smaller town named Or was Named Cupertino ! ...... .......... ._...... ... .... _._......_. Stop making us a San Francisco with all this building 11M Stop Now! _...... _.... _.._.. ... ... ........ . Yuan Wang Santa Clara, CA 2014-11-11 1 am in Cupertino high school district.1 am very concerned with the overloaded .. ._.........._ .. ...._.._... ........... ....... school capacity because of the rezone. ................_............._............... ... .. __..... Wei Wang Cupertino,. CA ...... ............_ .............................._ 2014-11-11 Cupertino has been too crowded ....................... _....... .......... ..........._ .............,. .... _.... Ritesh Tyagi cupertino, CA _........... ... ..... ... ...... ..... ...... ...- ..... ... ........... 2014-11-11 We live there. _.... .- .........._....__._.......I.......... ..... ....................._........ ................ __..._ Xue Wang Santa Clara, CA 2014-11-12 1 drive on Steven Creek Blvd between De Anza Ave and Lawrence Express Way everyday. Every evening during rush hours, cars couldn't move even though the traffic light is green for them. They have to wait for the second time. I couldn't imagine the condition after a few thousand more housing units are built. Not to mention the impact on our school, park, library and so on. Wendy Liu Cupertino, CA _ . _ ..... ........... 2014-11-12 Let's keep cupertino as a town not a city I Pleasel ....._.............. - .. ... I... ....... . ................... ...... .. ............. . Saumya Prasad Cupertino, CA 2014-11-13 Place is congested. Place doesnt urgently need any hotel. Or 1000 more residences. Many roads are just so random. Compare with Seattle (Redmond, Bellevue) or other well formed city then you realize how far behind Cupertino is. Need street lights on each road. Need side walks on each road and need proper bike lanes on each road. ...... ......... _.... ....... ... ... .......... _... ...... ... ... __. Manoj Jayadevan cupertino, United States 2014-11-13 Looking at the traffic congestion and the quality of the infrastructure , City of Cupertino reminds me of some third world cities that I have travelled to. This _..._.._ _......_ ......._........... ............._...... uncontrolled and mindless development must stop. .... ... ............1...._ .............................. ...... ._ ............. ...... . Pamela Yeary Cupertino, CA . ...... .. ..... . . ..._. _.. _...-_... .... ..... 2014-11-14 1 strongly object to the rezoning in our neighborhood _... ._ .-.- ... ..... .........._........ _ ............. _..._ ....... . _.. jian Zhang Santa Clara, CA 2014-11-15 i am against the rezoning the cupertino new apartment plan. It will cause serious environment, pollution, and school problem. Preethi Bangalore Cupertino, CA 2014-11-17 The traffic around this area is terrible enough already. I used to able to go to my son's school and back in 20 minutes, now it takes me an hour. This area is heavily congested with schools. We have loads of kids walking around. The traffic around schools scares us. There are no traffic lights around schools and .. ....... .-....... ....., ... •...,-...._............ ..... ........_...... people act as if they are Formula 1 drivers! .......... ...... ... ............__...,.......................... Kevin Reed Cupertino, CA 2014-11-18 Cupertino is overpopulated already, Realtors and Developers rule... and it's ruining the quality of life in Cupertino. The schools are already overcrowded, .. ..._...................... ............................................... and the City Council is out of touch. ...1.......... ... . ..........1 ....... ......_ ....... ........... ....... .... Alfred Yeung Santa Clara, CA 2014-11-20 The local traffic within Cupertino is getting worst everyday. I am taking longer and longer time just to get into the freeway. Also, I object of doing a re-zone as my kids deserve to have their right to continue their education in the city of _. ............. ...... ......... .... ..__.. Cupertino as what they are doing right now. . _ ................ ................. .........._._.. _......... ._....._- ... ... Michelle Lingofelter Santa Clara, United 2014-11-20 During the morning commute it takes close to ten minutes just to drive down States Stevens Creek Blvd from Cabot Ave heading west to Calvert Drive. This is due to yet another traffic light installed further down at Stern Ave. it's 0.7 miles. I believe that it will only get worse after all of the current construction projects in Cupertino are complete. We need to assess the impact those projects will have .......__.. .._ ............. .... _..... _......... ........... in traffic and noise/air pollution before any rezoning can be considered. _......... .................., _ ..._._...... ..I..............._ ..................._..... ..... .......... kelly wilson CUPERTINO, CA 2014-11-20 Our Health depends on this Name. Location: Date it Comment swarna California, CA 2014-11-21 1 do not want my kids to live in unsafe and busy neighborhood. David Ong Cupertino, CA 2014-11-21 My views are not consulted. This is way too presumptive of the city council. I _.. .......__ ......... .......... ..... _. _ ......_._ will vote them out for not representing us. ........ ......... ...... ...... _ ..._... _, ......... .......__. Satish Kowkuntla Cupertino, CA 2014-11-21 Traffic is becoming horrible around wolf rd/stevens creek/de-anza blvd are. Apple campus and new condos etc will add to the pain. These roads are _....................._...................... .._............ ... ., .. ..... .._ ... ............ already not safe for kids in several areas. ...... ........................................... . Shankar Iyer Cupertino, CA 2014-11-21 I can see the impact the development in the last few years is having on the traffic, safety and quality of life in the neighborhood. The City Council should ... . ....... ..........._. ....... ....... ..... .... ......_- .. focus on restoring these services before focusing on any new development. _ . ...... ._ ... ... . Jieh Yuan Chen Cupertino, CA 2014-11-21 Strongly oppose to re -zoning the Vallco shopping center. The corner of Stevens Creek and Wolfe was already overdeveloped. Enough traffic _.............. __... _._........... ....... __.......... ........ ............ congestion even without Apple's new office. .I......._.... ... _......_. ...............:..:._. ......_... ............ ..... Mary Raby Cupertino, CA 2014-11-22 My neighborhood is being over developed. Everything that is being built in Cupertino is focused in my area. Why aren't there any big complexes being built north of DeAnza Blvd? We have more that our share right now. Yet the want to build more around Vallco. Rose bowl is enough. Main Street Cupertino is enough. A 6 to 9 story building replacing the IHop is enough. Enough is ._ .... ......... .... _.. ................... enoughl! _ . ......... ...... .... .., R Wang Cupertino, CA 2014-11-22 I'm signing because we don't need to overcrowd our city just to meet ABAG _................. . _.._._._........_ .............. ._....................... requirements so that politicians can move on to state level office. ...... ._........... ..... ... . _ _ ..... _.... I ......................... . _..... ......_ Name Location: Date Comment" R Wang Cupertino, CA 2014-11-22 There are a few reasons everyone in Cupertino who lives here should sign this petition: 1. We are a sovereign independent city. We should not care what the Association of Bay Area Governments think. We should as a citizenry decide whether or not we want low-income housing, high density housing, mass transit corridors in our neighborhoods. We shouldn't just do it so that city council members who are checking off another check box item on their way to statewide office. 2. There is an unfunded tax mandate when we increase population and do not fund the schools. While more retail, condos, do fund the tax base, it does not necessarily translate to additional funding for the schools because of the way property taxes are redistributed. I'm not saying repeal Prop 13, that would be disasterous, however, we need transparency in what percentage of our property taxes really come back to the cupertino schools. Once you have that number, you'll have a good debate on why this is not fair 3. Traffic is already crazy here. With the apple campus and main street already in construction, one can already see the impact to the future of cupertino. having more high density homes and Main Street does not help the situation. One solution is to cancel Main Street so we have more walkable homes to Apple if that's why we need these In general, the problem with city government is that citizens are too busy making money and not involved until there is a crisis. If we could just be a bit more active and at least attend the December planning meeting, it would show that citizens care enough to stop big devloper projects and that we are watching to see who influences are city government. In my humble opinion, this year's city council election should have been about what type of growth. This is not about fast, smart, sustainable, etc. This is about what type of life do you want to preserve in Cupertino. R __. _....... ............ .... ....-_.............._.:.................._......... .... ...... .. ..... Arthur/Dolores Federico Cupertino, CA 2014-11-22 Cupertino is/has going the way of southern california. Cupertino is now the Anaheim of the North. Cupertino is a victim of its own success and brakes have to be applies to runaway growth. If the Feds are dictating housing numbers, than stop accepting Federal money. Fed money always has strings attached. John Frey I. - ....... . .. ._............... ......... .. ..... ..._- ... ...... ... Cupertino, CA ........ _..... ....... .... _......................... 2014-11-23 . _ . _.._...... ... ..... _... .._.._...... _... .......... ..... ..... To save our way of life and safety for our City ... ._.. - .-_ _._.... _......_... Parama Dutta Cupertino, CA 2014-11-23 1 completely agree with the petition. Rama Vallabhaneni Cupertino, CA 2014-11-23 Cupertino is already over crowded I don't want to get worse. Also, the school system is overloaded this would bring down the quality of education for the - .......... ........_ ........-.:........ ..... ...... ......... _.._...... kids. Also, it would add to pollution. ..... ---- ..... ...... ........_.......... ... ..... ... _.- ......... .... ...._ ... .... ...... joe Zheng Cupertino, CA ........... ....... ... ...... ................ 2014-11-24 .... .........__.........................__... 1 am signing because Cupertino is already too crowded. .........._..._ ... _... .... ... .... ..... .__... ..... .1.. ....... ..... .... ... ....... ... Chris Cheng Cupertino, CA 2014-11-24 Monta Vista High School is crowded. I understand that these housing plans __.. _.. ..................... ......... aspire to bring revenue to Cupertino, but at what cost? .............._ ............... ...... .... _..._ .. ...... ....... - ..........._ ._ ... Zhuru Zhang .......... ..... Cupertino, CA .............. ._...... ...... 2014-11-24 ..... _..... ... ......... ... don't want my town become condotino. .._ _ ..._... __....... . .. ................ . Yvette Calderon Sunnyvale, CA 2014-11-24 1 went to cupertino, I have a lot of friends in that area and I live close by so I certainly do not like hearing having to deal with more traffic in cupertino. Apple is already under construction on Wolfe Rd. We don't need anymore traffic. Name ,. Location °` Date Comment. . Sandra Ah Cupertino, CA 2014-11-24 I'm signing because the schools are overcrowded. The space for the children to play is inadequate. And adding more people will just make the situation worse. It is a lie to say families will not move into small new units. They move ...................... ................. here for the schools that are paid for by parcel taxes bore by homeowners. Sailaja Vellanki Cupertino, CA 2014-11-24 This proposal very bad for my kids, it overloads the schools and would result in drop of education quality; it worsens already congested roads. The quality of ._................................................_...................._........._..... _... living in Cupertino gets worse. I ..._ . .. _. _........... ... _.... _................... I ..... . Deepak PATIL Cupertino, CA 2014-11-24 Mainly due to traffic & the school so much crowded and also the main street & apple projects are still underway, nobody can sufficiently predict the outcome of these additional developments and their impact on traffic & people in general so if conformance is an issue then the city council should consider other viable areas first before committing any new housing approvals in this highly dense area. Deepthi Ganti Cupertino, CA _........ 2014-11-25 .. ...... .... ...... ........._..._........ ........... ............,.,.... 1 oppose this new constructions .... ......................... . . . Iris Gorgen Cupertino, CA _........ _............. ...... __.... ... ...... 2014-11-26 _........ .... . - .... _..._ . ........ .... .... Iris Gorgen _..... ..... ....... ..._ .... .........._. Prachi Shah Cupertino, CA 2014-11-28 1 agree with most of the concerns raised herewith. I support the community for raising voice and request city council to perform their full due diligence for the best of all and don't take what-ever comes handy to meet City/State criteria. David Robinson Cupertino, CA 2014-11-29 Stop the cosy relationship between city officials and developers. I would not be surprised if officials uncovered corruption and collusion with our council members and staff. Jayanthi Srinivasan Cupertino, CA 2014-11-29 1 care! ........ ... . _.. ... ...... . ......... .... .......... ....__... .. . sunita murthy Cupertino, CA .. .... 2014-11-30 ...... ...-................ 1 want less crowd and more space for our kids .. ... - . ................. _...... _...... .. . Jeffrey Lin Cupertino, CA ,. 2014-11-30 _ _. ... If the Housing Allocation can be satisfied by using sites that are currently zoned for residential development, then we should not rezone additional sites for residential development. Our city already has problems with congestion and school overcrowding. We should solve those problems first, rather than .................. ..... ...._._......... .. _.... - _. .. ........_.... ..... exacerbate them with more residential rezoning. ...... ................ .... ......... : Hesham Abu-el-Ata Cupertino, CA 2014-11-30 Against adding population and traffic congestions to East Cupertino. joseph zhang San Jose, CA 2014-12-01 we want our mall ..... ...... ............. _..._................ ... -..... ........ Djash Mahuab Cupertino, CA .. -. 2014-12-01 . ............ _..... ... .................. .......... ..._............_ ... ...... 1 like Vallco Mail. .. _ .._.;._. ....................... ......_ David Shen cupertino, CA .. __.._...-... ... 2014-12-01 _.... _................................_- 1 adore amc and these wonderful attractions in Cupertino. Without these, business would significantly decrease. Possibilities of new businesses coming _.. ...... ......... ........... ............ __._........ ._...... _ ....... ........_.. into vallco is always a possibility. ... ..... ...................... ......... -.... ...... _.. Josephine Kraemer Belmont, CA 2014-12-01 I used to live in Cupertino up until two years ago and I still visit Valco regularity to spend time with friends, to eat out or watch a movie. Most of my friends are Cupertino residents and visiting them at Valco is incredibly efficient and the _._.........................................._..........._...... ... _ .. mall itself is filled with quite a few memories. _ ... ..__...._................_..............._.................,_ Zack Yang Cupertino, CA 2014-12-01 Vallco brings memories ...... _...... _............._...... _................._.-...... _..._ Neela Venkat Cupertino, CA 2014-12-01 _ ..... __................. ............ -- ............. Cupertino Apartments are increasing but not the schools. I don't want the student teacher ratio to go beyond a decent number and affect the quality of education. _... _._._.. ........... .. ...... ...... ...._....... ......-... Lokesh Narayan Cupertino, CA ............ _-.. ...... __ .. .. 2014-12-01 _...:. _............ _.._._.............................. ......_... 1 am signing because I don't want to re-zone the commercial sites in Cupertino _ .......... ....... ......... . Tommy Cheng Cupertino, CA _...._....__............... ............. ... ........ 2014-12-01 .......... _....... Cupertino is my home _............... ......... .._..... ................... ........ .............. ._... Name Location Date Comment Jun Chang Cupertino, CA 2014-12-01 Cupertino is already plagued by heavy traffic due to the amount of people moving in. In addition, there are a lot of construction already going on that will .,also furthermore congest the traffic around the area. The main street project down Stevens Creek plans on introducing a 120 -unit market price apartment, a 180 -room five -story hotel, 130,500 square feet of retail and 260,000 square feet of office. And Apple Campus 2 plans on hosting 12,000 staff members. As of now, we do not know devastating the consequences of these projects will have on the traffic. Adding more living spaces in what is currently public space does not help solve the problem, especially when it is being built in the middle of all the traffic. Not only the living spaces bring more traffic, it will also introduce more students into Fremont Union High School District. FUHSD is overloading with students and is currently expecting more than 1800 new students by the year 2020. Adding on more living spaces in this area will inevitably increase class sizes and lower the excellent quality of education the district is known for. (tl;dr) Don't need more heavy traffic. FUHSD has way too much students given the limitations of the schools. ........., _„ ..,......... Tsunglun Yu Cupertino, CA 111......1 ....... 2014-12-01 The schools are already over crowded. Rezoning without considering building _........................._ ......... ....... ..... .... .. ........... ... new schools to accommodate new students is not responsible. _.-1111. 1 11_1 _..........1111. _........ _11 . .... ............. . ................ 1 ....... ..... 11 .. ........... Annie Yang Newport Beach, United 2014-12-01 make a better mall instead; make cupertino an interesting place please States Samantha Tam cupertino, CA 2014-12-01 1 want Vallco revived not built into housesl Vallco needs to become the new place for families teens and adult to go shopping and spend time together Mily Tsou Cupertino, CA 2014-12-01 Cupertino city should not approve re -zoning the commercial sites in Cupertino. _......_.................... .. ......... -.... ....... ......._.._. We don not need so many residential condo ....... ..... .. .11 ...... 11- 1111.. 1. 11. 1... ............. ......_....... ... .. ..... ...,....... Sira Sudhindranath San Jose, United States 2014-12-02 The proposed changes will make the city very crowded. The only people to benefit are the so-called developers. Residents of Cupertino will not benefit in any way but in fact, will see their quality of life go down drastically, not to mention the increased dangers of higher vehicular traffic resulting from the _......._-...-._........................ ... ..... ..... ....,._....... additional houses and office buildings. ......... .... ........ ..__._. ... I ...... ...... I ... ..... ... ... 1..., ... _............... 1.....................1 11 ... .............. _.... Monika Shah Cupertino, CA 2014-12-02 Being Cupertino resident facing traffic congestion on Stevens Creek and De ........ .. .. . ..... ... .......... 111_- ............ .........- Anza blvd. This will get worst with rezoning. 111_1. .1.........11...1. ...... _........ 1111 ... Yan Zhang Sunnyvale, CA 2014-12-02 1 am sign here because to avoid traffic jams created by rezoning. Jin Cui Cupertino, CA 2014-12-02 School is very crowded and traffic is really bad ........ 1 ....1..... .........._....... . ... .., .. .. __ ................ ..._ ... ........ _........... .....,._.. ........ Irwin Hui Los Angeles, CA __... ........I. ..., 11 _ _1111_. ........ 2014-12-02 1 was raised in Cupertino. Vallco was a fun experience for me. _............. _1111.. .....:... .......... ............ ... ......._.... 1111_ ........... ... .......... _ Donna Lee Cupertino, CA 2014-12-02 Too many high raised buildings, as residents increase, the quality of life will decrease. ............. .......... .. ... _..._......... _............_. _1111 -.......... Joan Yuan Cupertino, CA __ ......... .... ..... ... ... _.... 2014-12-02 There's no planning of infrastructure or schools to go with this proposal. All .. ...... _ .......... ......_... .... population increase will be concentrated in this small area. .........,......... ....... ................ ... .... ... ,.. ..... .......... Claire Saxton Santa Clara, CA 2014-12-02 Residents and community members need the chance to have input on the way 1111.... their neighborhood is developed. ..... __._..... .... ........ ... ............-................................. __........ Anne Ling Cupertino, CA 2014-12-02 I'm singing here because I agree the petitions and would like to make our voices heard! I ......... 1 ....... ... .,..,.........,..........,,...... ..,. .I .. ....... ................... ....,.... ... ............... ... Bambi Nguyen Santa Clara, CA ...... _.... .... _._ ....... ............. .._ .......... ......111 1. ........... 2014-12-02 1 grew up with Vallco and I want my kids to grow up with it too... ............... .......... . .._..... ....... _.._... _._.. ...._ _._ .........1..111. .............. 1111.._... Xiaotian Wu cupertino, CA 2014-12-02 1 am signing, because I dont want more people to be in my school. Name 'Location. Date Comment: AM San Jose, CA 2014-12-02 Need clear plans of how city will accommodate schooling for the new housing projects. 1400 units will bring in approximately 2800 kids - almost 3 times the current total students in Hyde Middle (1000), and almost 1.5 times the total students in Cupertino High (2000). David Tung Sunnyvale, United States 2014-12-02 <a href="http://tungtraveling.blogspot.tw/2014/12/say-no-to-re-zoning- co mmercial-sites-i n. html" rel="nofollow">http:/ttungtraveling.blogspot.tw/2014/12/say-no-to-re-zoning- commercial-sites-in. html</a> Xing Han Cupertino, CA __ .. ..... .... .. 2014-12-02 i am strongly against city council's decision on rezoning Vallco Mall ..__. _..... ...... _.. Jyothi Nellore Cupertino, CA _ _......... .......- ._ .. ... ......... 2014-12-02 This will make the schools even more crowded _ Xiaodong ZHANG San Jose, CA ..................................... ...... 2014-12-02 1 live Cupertino area and I pass Wolfe and Stevens creek everyday to work, the _.._...................... traffic is so bad and that I have to detour often. No more apartment in that area. .__..._....._.. __. _.._...... ...... ..... .... .... Umesh Mahindra Cupertino, CA 2014-12-02 It will make schools and area even more crowded Shefali Venkatramani Cupertino, CA 2014-12-02 for the future generations of people living in Cupertino. It used to be a quiet and safe place for children to grow up in, with all the construction going on now it isn't even close to that, I don't want to imagine what will happen when you ................. finished whatever other random stuff you have planned. .._. _............... ... _.... ... .... Vinayak Karnataki Cupertino, CA 2014-12-02 1 am signing this petition because I want safer and sustainable future for my family and not just a sellout that leads to over -crowding and congestion. Anuradha Singh cupertino, CA 2014-12-02 1 am signing as Cupertino is a small city and has already become too crowded. The quality of school, library and city is going down with increasing apartments and more commercial construction. _. .......... ................... ....... ..... Amor Willey Cupertino, CA _.......... .._................_._ .....__...... I ..... I ....._... _......... .. ._ ...... ........ 2014-12-02 1 don't want Cupertino to be like San Jose, crowded, lot of trafficl!! ..... ...... ...... . ..... ._. .......................... _....._..... ....... � j 2- It y tt ) What's wrong with EIR? Really? Copy & Paste Errors • According to both FUHSD and Planning Committee, this is the data source of EI R analysis on school impacts y f . "ui ,r, ncr ,' FIS , < I .r d",: - C' 1c,"p tr. li'..I:."o' -9.-i. d4 Lam. ;: ida<c. 613583;'66091435C, 11' ENROLLMENT PROJECTION CONSULTANTS Providing School Districts with Accurate Enrollment Forecasts by Location Area 32 Older Mobile Home Park 450 units. 90 K-8 students. 0.20 SGR Area 28 Recent Ulmer -Income Det. Homes 218 units, 85 K-8 students. 0.39 SGR Aron 33 Recent Upscale Townhouses 82 units, 9 K-8 students, 0 11 SGR Area 34 Recent Middle -Income Det- Homes 94 units. 33 K-8 students. 0,35 SGR Area 35 Older Middle-income Det. Homes 89 units. 57 K-8 students, 0,64 SGR nus �.�.�. Elementary and Middle School Attendance Boundaries Superintendent and Board of Trustees February 3, 2014 Fremont Union High School District 589 West Fremont Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94087 ff -> Area 34 Recent Middle -Income Det- Homes 94 units. 33 K-8 students. 0,35 SGR Area 35 Older Middle-income Det. Homes 89 units. 57 K-8 students, 0,64 SGR nus �.�.�. Elementary and Middle School Attendance Boundaries Superintendent and Board of Trustees February 3, 2014 Fremont Union High School District 589 West Fremont Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94087 ENROLLMENT PROJECTION CONSULTANTS Providing School Districts with Accurate Enrollment Forecasts by Location Superintendent and Board of Trustees Fremont Union High School District 589 West Fremont Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94087 February 3, 2014 ® 2,838 2,919 2,979 3,099 2,837 2,839 2,689 2,845 2,865 3,037 2,995 3,075 3,028 Table 2: Actual Enrollments and Actual and Projected Resident (9-12) Students Fall 2013 2,057 Enrollment part of Table 2 Table 1: Projected Total District October Enrollment, 2013 to 2023 ---- Fremont High School Homestead lli h School Actual October 2013' Projected Res. 9-12 Student Pop. nbrook I ligh School Resident Total Projected Enrollment by Grade in the Total Projected Enrollment by FUHSD Early Sunnyvale Enrollment and Cupertino Union Elementary School Districts Grade in Fremont Union HSD (9-12) Oct. TK+K 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total 2013" 2,748 2,858 3,040 2,975 3,061 2,959 2,775 2,704 2,787 2,632 2,640 2,696 2,689 10,657 2014 2,590 2,845 2,889 3,063 2,971 3,040 2,933 2,778 2,698 2,873 2,646 2,632 2,714 1o,865 2015 2,712 2,677 2,879 2,919 3,058 2,955 3,015 2,937 2,776 2,773 2,892 2,640 2,656 10,961 2016 2,680 2,798 2,711 2,906 2,920 3,029 2,921 3,012 2,928 2,857 2,784 2,883 2,661 11,185 2017 2,927 2,771 2,833 2,740 2,905 2,902 2,984 2,922 3,004 3,009 2,873 2,776 2,904 11,562 2018 2,845 3,028 2,808 2,863 2,742 2,885 2,872 2,982 2,917 3,076 3,022 2,666 2,796 11,760 2019 2,825 2,941 3,067 2,837 2,861 2,723 2,847 2,871 2,971 2,985 3,089 3,013 2,883 11,970 ® 2,838 2,919 2,979 3,099 2,837 2,839 2,689 2,845 2,865 3,037 2,995 3,075 3,028 Table 2: Actual Enrollments and Actual and Projected Resident (9-12) Students Fall 2013 2,057 Enrollment part of Table 2 F Projected Resident Studer ---- Fremont High School Homestead lli h School Actual October 2013' Projected Res. 9-12 Student Pop. nbrook I ligh School Resident Attending Attending (ind. SDC and NPS) in Oct. of School Students Adjust- Enrollment 2014 2015 2Y17 20 Fremont 2,008 -12 1,996 1,976 1,996 2,218 2,540 Homestead 2,378 6 2,384 2,442 2,447 2,529 2,682 Math Vlsh 2,354 -4 2,350 2,398 2,407 2,556 2,480 Cupordno 2,015 42 2,057 2,119 2,238 2,462 2,720 Lynbrook 1,756 90 1,846 1,798 1,761 1,714 1,614 Community NA 11 11 NA NA NA NA NPS NA 13 13 NA NA NA NA as Total- I 10,511 146 10,657 1 10,733 10,849 11,479 12,036 SCHOOL ENROLLMENT AND FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ALTERNATIVES Prep"md for: Table 5-4 Enrollment by High School - FUHSD Sourcc: Frimllmcnt Projection Consultants understands the Data in Table 2 Table 2 contains two sets of data. The figures on the le nder "Enrollment part of Table 21 show how the current enrollment at each school differs from the ent population. There are 2,008 district -enrolled (9-12) students, for instance, with home addresses ' e Fremont attendance area. That school's enrollment, however, is 1,996, which is 12 less than the resid total. This net difference is shown by the "-12" in the top row of the "Attending Adjust" column in the e. The second set of data, on the right side of the table (under "Projected Resident Student Populatio art's, has the projected resident amounts. These are not projected enrollments. Fall 2013 2,057 Fall t 2,720 -------------- Cupertino IIi h School ---- Fremont High School Homestead lli h School - 1,996 2,384 2,540 2,682 nbrook I ligh School 1,846 1,614 onta Vista lligh School 2,350 21,480 Other 24 0 District Total 10,657 12,036 Sourcc: Frimllmcnt Projection Consultants understands the Data in Table 2 Table 2 contains two sets of data. The figures on the le nder "Enrollment part of Table 21 show how the current enrollment at each school differs from the ent population. There are 2,008 district -enrolled (9-12) students, for instance, with home addresses ' e Fremont attendance area. That school's enrollment, however, is 1,996, which is 12 less than the resid total. This net difference is shown by the "-12" in the top row of the "Attending Adjust" column in the e. The second set of data, on the right side of the table (under "Projected Resident Student Populatio art's, has the projected resident amounts. These are not projected enrollments. ENROLLMENT PROJECTION CONSULTANTS Providing School Districts with Accurate Enrollment Forecasts by Location ( I� achy°>ison 1 I •'•. 1 j •. _ qIr Superintendent and Board of Trustees Fremont Union High Sctwd District 589 West Fremont Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94087 Projected Enrollments from 2013 to 2023 Projected Impacts of New Housing Febrwry 3, 2014 Fremont Union High School District average older ATT development. The recent "Regular ATT' units in the CUM, on the other hand, have a much higher 0.12 high school SGR. The 0.35 TK -8 SGR in those dwellings also indicates the 9-12 SGR will become even larger in the next few years. " Some samples have changed significantly since the last study, with the just -completed tracts added and developments built before 2005 now excluded. Enrollment Projection Consultants Page 13 SCHOOL ENROLLMENT AND FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT ALTERNATIVES Pr P—d f - City of Cupertino School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis The four large apartment projects, with a total of 828 rental units, constructed since 1995 in CUSD have average SGRs of 0.25 for grades K-5 and 0.07 for grades 6-8, for a total of 0.32 elementary and middle students per home. The units have an SGR of 0.07 for high school, making the total K-12 SGR 0.39 students per home. This total SGR is three to five times the Employment? City of cuwnino 4.2.3. Enrollment from All Housing School Enrollment and Fiscal Impact Analysis owimal It has increased substantially in the last decade and is expecting to continue to increase, especially in the technology industry. The Apple Campus2 complex will be part of this increase. A large •a The Proposed Proj is an increase of 5,3 93,910 square feet of office and commercial C LA R SANTA oeoher 9, 2014 construction. Everycare feet of commercial or industrial development pment creates the need UNIFIED SSCHOOLCommun for one additional housing unit in the Santa Clara area for new employees of the businesses. The DISI --K T m un Comhity Development City of Cupertino _ - -- 10300 Torre Avenue IR99 "wma Rd Unts C:ao. CA Cupertino, CA 95014 9 1 n S I t4("g)421-20DO RE: City of Cupertino General Plan Amendment, Housing Update &NLEY Rr� tr:, tial. %UnR1VI1-Nr*'V; Dear Mr. Ghosh, 4,040,231sf office space =* 2428 housing units How many students generated by employment used in EIR? J A Look at the Data Table 4-11 City ofcuperttno School Enrdlment and Fiscal bncoct Analysis Current Enrollment Compared to Capacity Elementary Schools Table 412 Enrollment Capacity Compared to Enrollment by School Attendance Areas from New Units in the City of Cupertino and Existing Units School Enrollment Increase Majority of increase is coming from new housing Net increase oiiins � New unit contribution rden Gate ncoln Regnart Sedgwick Only TRUE if new housing units tevens Creek are distributed evenly across Reminder of District scholl attendance area Total -1800 -900 0 ._ . Va Enrollment Increase Small number city wide, hence EIR concludes the impact on school is LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT Classroom = School? TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary Section 1 Regulatory Context 1.1. Education Code Section 17620 1.2. Senate Bill 50 1.3. Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code Section 66000-66008) Section 2 School Facility Standards M Itl atl0 n Plan 2.1 wo story class room 2.2 T'er Sc o 2.3f -and Area NONE 2.4 kccessihility� 4.2. Enrollment Projections 4.2.1. Housing Projections has resulted in overcrowding in many of these schools. Most of the schools are accommodating more students than their design capacity, primarily by adding modular classrooms. Some educational support facilities - cafeteriafgeneral purpose spaces, administrative offices, support classrooms for music/wt or for students with targeted needs, playground space and facilities, etc. Conclusion on School Impact: LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT? • Even based on grossly underestimated enrollment, the conclusion of school impact should be SIGNIFICANT and UNAVOIDABLE. • The new housing units significantly increase the enrollments of the neighborhood schools • There is no feasible mitigation strategy to meet the state school standards Put in Perspective Problems with raw data, logic and conclusion we find here? Please don't vote on GPA until we have a credible EIR ce R.e,f.:e-:re:n What to plan in General Plan? General Plan Amendment FAQs 1. What is a General Flan? The General Flan is a regulatory document that includes goals and policies that set the Oground rubs for conserving resources, designing new projects, expanding public services and improving community amenities. at confers a wide variety of issues' ranging from urban dein and moUllity to public health and safety. Existing 2005 Cupertino General Plan Name 0 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 2 Land Use 3 Housing 4 Circulation 5 Environmental Resources/Sustainabirdy 6 Health and $"e Modified Type Actions 6125113 11: 10 am 612511311:11 am 612511311:11 am 612511311:12 am 612511311:12 am 612511311:12 am 612511311:12 am General Plan is not just Housing Element or Vallco Adoption � a � °�� ¢Foy F me00 4 q, 4Z Cli Ib V% JPO '7 �o ,moo C, Best time to plan for 2040 • Historically GPA and Housing Element were planned separately • A lot of changes are happening from now to the end of the current GPA • We need time to do the planning properly - �o C�5 - - - " o 0 � a � °�� ¢Foy F me00 4 q, 4Z Cli Ib V% JPO '7 �o ,moo C, Best time to plan for 2040 • Historically GPA and Housing Element were planned separately • A lot of changes are happening from now to the end of the current GPA • We need time to do the planning properly - �o C�5 How much GPA changes needed for I lousing Element? Table 4 Planning Committee recommended Housing Element Sites and Alternatives of Staff Report for Dec. 2, 2014 City Council Meeting (http-//www.cupertinogpa.ora/files/managed/Document/369/ STAFFREPORT pdf) Cc 6V jp,2 • ft Kp Qv►1 aL %A 9 .Sl z e va l i C -v cv "-f Kt j a w w ! /lo 1,/Z Z� Ili 1 . L61- Lay`" covf."ie eg+,--�iad 00/o tl�ccl l Cm �ro psl� /��a h Lof z g o Z kit 160 ^�T 0, � �`2 f CA -ft o g✓tlo�r•,� Sr'Ze �Q�fic« ► /DoE S"9.7 l Ser"s G& -«.ye Z c f -a. x + Macy Ga..Ye sA-0 + - �,s ®cL d y p o0o Q qLV ov +355 + I / Re -tat 1 600,Ooo � op2^. e Gen 1(,f t Z w, 30 s 37�'rro�.s 3� �,Qese�Qtif"S--O,g 3Y6 � yziriv``estrhei i ' 6 00 v lc 47 11/rd c -t M try `* Joe CG'id40"f -0 �,s ®cL d y p o0o Q qLV ov +355 + I Apple Campus Original campus [e( Entrance sign on Ir a Loop Built 1993 Location Cupertino, Cafdorraa, U.S Coordinates t,i 37 3-318211122 03118'W Architect Sobrato Development Company Area 850;000 square feet (79,000 m2) Map of the Apple Campus -' Address t e Loop, Cupertino, CA 95014 A to yo l e cat to y t/4 -?— IM OL I K e 7' Apple Campos 2 % 35500 Joy u1�IleY ►►�zz/� Lot S►z 2 -3 Z cc. c'- 2 V39 3', 9 zOicfz e%j0Idi1-ot.y s(z49- ..moo 1�0•1 % fJv'ea )P4fu Ahne �K✓►/OtitN�L1wJ Lot S[ z e l- Us �y S1 x e 17 S' c.c� e -7, 6Z3, 000 z. i, 900 6'ZC-+ Creeg^ �z SOO E..4plo�re eS -- riKArtc IW,wexCt u. yVelS Lal- , rz-e 841ldtkCJ ,SIte 17 K c,`c,as ©FF ce z(vD,oOO,rr Z 7571 N gm 113 ko¢ tui I 130, Pas U. 1z1�� .I— '(61 K6, ZZ H .•-�► 2 S. 3 o/o A14f4t toA d C3 �'lva•s �clevv� �%v�� zSZg►�Tzx3 -F00fp .o'Lr 7S8 y3 � scut G� f�m� Fr 79.3 75.3 ,v Alec, 4-60 Technical Technical details Floor count 41''' Floor area 2,800,000 square �• (260,000 ffr)(M Grounds 176 acres (710;0 Design and construo iik Architecture ftrm Foster + Partner, � � er � Services engineer IM OL I K e 7' Apple Campos 2 % 35500 Joy u1�IleY ►►�zz/� Lot S►z 2 -3 Z cc. c'- 2 V39 3', 9 zOicfz e%j0Idi1-ot.y s(z49- ..moo 1�0•1 % fJv'ea )P4fu Ahne �K✓►/OtitN�L1wJ Lot S[ z e l- Us �y S1 x e 17 S' c.c� e -7, 6Z3, 000 z. i, 900 6'ZC-+ Creeg^ �z SOO E..4plo�re eS -- riKArtc IW,wexCt u. yVelS Lal- , rz-e 841ldtkCJ ,SIte 17 K c,`c,as ©FF ce z(vD,oOO,rr Z 7571 N gm 113 ko¢ tui I 130, Pas U. 1z1�� .I— '(61 K6, ZZ H .•-�► 2 S. 3 o/o A14f4t toA d C3 �'lva•s �clevv� �%v�� zSZg►�Tzx3 -F00fp .o'Lr 7S8 y3 � scut G� f�m� Fr 79.3 75.3 ,v Alec, 4-60 Toes. 35500 /40 o- eaecd ,S� u a / e, La t S( z 2 Sal, 6 6 3,L 7'J MQ x/ffow.e9oe►�s _ Beodenngs of the aypmved FI -u Stevens Geek Boulevard (North) SI& Lo* Site sry r�t,�.ySlZe iQct ,l Z03;7clzOcr Arta l2atco $vtIde ky <,s -e 3.1 r4,c'e Pffad S77/rpr t 117 Z ( k,Frz iptt it t 9 ZOO,& . 76 J1r p z ;,6, t 0' 4 ✓ 0c, lea- -to P1 i w►; -s ro aXPOrt-e Naw o" How 11-9, Lit -FO,- L/P rd z 3S- vN I is d ,ftZ 9. ) QGr 3Sz836Fr / E 4 a rc 1.41 pJj/ t • ---> q M�xcd use X619 z FJor q1 7.i.. 1ZZ Rte^ e�l�urv,� .Fio �.. /A44 Sr -.-.e e T Ig7,clol 3/ Vis. 35500 CVe4/r7vjo wko% 60o01s r-'-ose Row/ J,!,, - u/l6(QY (6IzL1 'evirc,-y 4iz-e AQ +b-• 1 67/Y q Z. yr (gay I e fq 79 It Rr�il BuildinK a Fkvat�m .� i • y o A,, �Pa fc o Lat S1 -7- 7, Y 7 325, 3y3 � Z Nyatf go-tt 1 19",Id,-y 51z2 Py. (9l rip pt�k 3834/ S-41 9i3 9, re 4Fmm- i�ck�f��r net r -L Ir"c. IGtKCIf�'it��. Ldt s. z -t RV,Id��.y Crz � 9 Z3 y7,pr 'M$1-6IUIO�DAO, I?aaw.4 F/d+M Gloo-ofl wr Coife j/ d- t V, 61 10-evcloppw►.t.w7` va/l c0 600 W4,A it, 3 7r- 1* -I -t 112eow►S 6 00, vo0.F,l-l- Ole fag 1 7, gal 00�zr? c M� fi-Vice Itto" S7 Cawdo 0141 is G 3 516, 2- lee 4a 1 / it j (P " & \ va If co �--f to. \ov I 5 go i' fS �IZO q r Roof &-A ^" y qsAV ` (019, p®0 cr �. 80 Rof e t Ie�tfl S To noo4jL f2 40 I 0 0 to IB►�m 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 Student Enrollment Data Abraham Lincoln Elementary —John F. Kennedy Middle —Mor}--% u:rrt, —Toti Sources: CA DOE, SCCOE 0 00 �� 00 00 Oj �CPI � C0 C0 C0 4 OQ OQ OO OO OQ OO QQ 6 00 OQ OZ O, O� O'y 'y ,y'� '�'� �'� h'y O'y 1ti Rti C;v (9 titi 'L`1' �ti �'1' �ti O� A g' - O'1' Q'1' , IV IV .,�T O� C" 00 Cal 00 C' 00 00 00 00 00 OO 00 00 QO QO 00 QO QO 00 00 Q'y O'y Q'y Q� ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti ti 3000 2000 Student Enrollment Data Cupertino High Fremont High Homestead Hieh Sources: CA DOE, SCCOE 1000 �� Off' �� Off ` �h OHO �� O� 00 O, 01' O'5 Off` Oh OHO 01 O`b OCA Z) titi y'L , -.3 ti� ti°� ti°' ; ti°� ti°� ti°� ti� ti°' ti°5 ,LO .LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,L4 ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO ,LO `b�O �,' �ti 'C� 'C 'C 'C Students(CUSD+FUHSD) 19901991 19506 20002001 24719 20102011 28728 Residents 40263 50546 58302 Ratio 48.4% 48.9% 49.3% Rsquared(Residents vs. Students) Sources: CA DOE, US Census Cupertino Housing Units Very Low o 0-50/ Low 51%-80% Moderate 80-120% o Above Moderate 120%+ 1988-98 Allocate 31174 508 444 635 11587 Result 21267 97 52 4 2,114 71% 19% 12% 1% 133% 1999-06 Allocate 21720 412 198 644 119466 Result 11339 36 12 79 1,212 49% 9% 6% 12% 83% 2007-14 Allocate 11170 341 229 243 357 Result 547 22 16 58 451 47% 6% 7% 24% 126% 2014-22 Allocate 1,064 356 207 231 270 Result http://www.abag.ca.gov/planning/housing/research.htmI rn'o.n A-, West of "North .` of pa Va llco Gateway' �..„ Hamptons _ 180 Units 11 "Stelling Gateway & y 570 Units "N De Anza Gateway"` 180 Units'.x..-r� �... rtino 394 Units West "North De Anza Corridor"T., 9 "Heart Heart of the City 11 Corridor ttt �E di1,: Rogers West of "South De Anza Corridor" m' 172 Units Hathaway ySarriaton r'1v,a E, t�a��zstra stat; AS:rn �} _ — ' Beck San Tomas Aquinos REGIONAL HOUSING NEED ALLOCATION (2014-2022) Housing Elements and Regional Housing Need Allocation http://www.hcd.ca.gov/hpd/hrc/plan/he/ ABAG # City Submit # % Submit Date Type Campbell 933 11218 31% 9/15/2014 Draft Cupertino 1,002 1,102 10% Gilroy 11088 4,525 316% 8/22/2014 Draft Los Altos 477 Los Altos Hills 121 Los Gatos 619 Milpitas 3,290 Monte Sereno 61 61 0% 10/13/2014 Draft Morgan Hill 928 Mountain View 2,926 3,166 8% 5/23/2014 Draft Palo Alto 1,988 2,188 10% 7/9/2014 Draft San Jose 35,080 35,117 0% 10/3/2014 Draft Santa Clara 4,093 5,876 44% 9/4/2014 Draft Saratoga 439 480 9% 8/28/2014 Draft Sunnyvale 5,452 5,849 7% 9/12/2014 Draft Housing Elements and Regional Housing Need Allocation http://www.hcd.ca.gov/hpd/hrc/plan/he/ Cupertino 2014-2022 R Units M C H F Residential Allocation "Rose Bowl" 204 Existing 0 204 0 0 "Main St" + "Biltmore" 190 Existing 0 190 0 0 Plan to "Stelling Gateway" & 180 Meet 0 0 180 0 "N De Anza Gateway" ABAG Plan to West of "North Vallco 180 Meet 0 0 0 180 Gateway" y A BAG Plan to "Hamptons" 570 Meet 0 0 0 0 ABAG W "Heart of the City Corridor" Plan to W "North De Anza Corridor" W 172 Meet 172 0 0 0 of "South De Anza Corridor" ABAG 1,102 172 394 180 180 Advantage • Meet ABAG 2014-2022 Housing Allocation number • Consistent with General Plan • Better new housing development plan across whole Cupertino Balance the traffic • Balance new housing units for each high school 12-(2- (tUf #-�2_ " -", Level Place School 777oName attend? Level 2 1st IMonte Vista High School Teacher % Keiko Howard Level 2 1st Monte Vista High School Student Apanuba Mahmood yes Level 2 1st Monte Vista High School Student Melinda Yang Level 2 1st Monte Vista High SchoolStudent Szu-Hua Su I - _ Level 2 . _ 5th Cupertino High School Teacher Yukari Salazar Level 2 5th Cupertino High School Student Hannah Ekman Level 2 5th Cupertino High School Student Madison Steakley Level 3 1stLynbrook High School Teacher Jeremy Kitchen Leve 13 �1_ — �� .. _ . st Lynbrook High School Student Andrew Gu yes j —St—u—d Level 3 1st Lynbrook High School Student Julia Jin yes Level 3 1st Lynbrook High School Student Leigh Williams yes ' Level 3 2nd Cupertino High School Teacher Yukari Salazar yes Level 3 2nd Cupertino High School Student Esther Hsu yes Level 3 2nd Cupertino High School Student Rachael Logan 1 Level 3 12nd -Cupertino High School Student Tony Wu yes�� Level 4 2nd lCupertino High School Teacher Yukari Salazar Cupertino High School — Student John Zhao Level 42nd Level 4 2nd Cupertino High School Student Natalie Yuen Level 4 2nd Cupertino High School Student Pallavi Rao Level 4 —3rd,—Lynbrook High School Teacher Jeremy Kitchen I Level 4 3rd Lynbrook High School Student Jaeyeon Lyu� Level 4 3rd x Lynbrook High School Student Jessica Lin Level 4 Level 4 3rd Lynbrook High School StudentKristiin, Chen yes 5th Monte Vista High School 'Teacher �I.Keiko Howard Level 4 5th Monte Vista High School Student Lauren Chang Leve14 5th Monte Vista High School StudentLilian Ngeow Level 4 n/a 5th Monte Vista High School Student Tasha Trinh n/a Monte Vista High School Student Sara Hsi yes n/a n/a Monte Vista High School Student May Su yes n/a n/a Monte Vista High School Student Monica Wang yes p n/a n/a Monte_Vista High School Student Rachael Wu ayes (n/a n/a Lynbrook High School student Chloe Lyu yes l n/a n/a Lynbrook High School teacher Kumi Kobayashi yes n/a n/a Lynbrook High School principal John Dwyer yes (Z 2- (ILf '47 D__ Thoughts on Housing Element and General Plan Mark Santoro First, remember that whatever our own opinions are, your jobs as council members are to represent the public. Given that, for the residents of Cupertino: General Plan: 1. Hotels -OK with the staff recommendation of 1339 rooms. Brings in TOT, and is needed for Apple. 2. Additional Office - 0sf. More office brings more traffic, and a potential need for more housing with little tax increase. Have 500Ksf in current plan. 3. Commercial, keep the existing no more required 4. Heights - No increases except where required. (OK with Cupertino Inn at 110' if they provide 5 Star hotel with big conference rooms, 75' for Hamptons if approved as housing element site, others only as required to meet Housing Element densities) 5. Community Benefits - against giving increased heights for community benefits as the "retail component" height bonus have not been clearly defined and generally made the public unhappy. 6. PG&E, against rezoning as proposed. Housing Element: I am only in favor of the minimum amount of housing required to meet the ABAG requirements. Here are my suggestions in order: Hamptons 748 -Close to Apple and 280 to reduce traffic, lower school impact Glenbrook 93 - Approved in current Housing Element Villages 62 - Approved in current Housing Element Carl Berg 169 - Next to Villages, good site Shan, Qmart 37 - Approved in current Housing Element Total 1109 - 1002 additional required thus we would have 10% extra If the Council wishes to provide some housing units to Vallco to meet the staff number of 1300, 200 units could be placed at Vallco. Last choices for housing element: Summerwinds, Marina foods. Vallco: I would insist on retaining the existing 1.2Msf of retail (at a min retain 1Msf). Only allow the min amount of office and housing to get it built I think 200 housing units and 500sf of office should be the MAX allowed. It Frequently Asked Questions : City of Cupertino General Plan A... Page 1 of 9 3. How long is the process to amend the General Plan? The General Plan Amendment process is anticipated to take 18 months, starting in March 2013 and concluding with City Council adoption of the amended plan in late 2014. The schedule for the Housing Element is mandated by the State and is discussed in the Housing Element FAQs. For the General Plan Amendment and Housing Element process and schedule, please visit the Schedule page. 4. How has the City engaged the community in the amendment process? Throughout the General Plan Amendment process, the City has engaged local residents, property owners and business owners in order to gather their valuable thoughts, expectations and concerns about the future of Cupertino. Opportunities for engagement have included postcards sent to every postal customer in Cupertino, community workshops, online comment forms, neighborhood meetings and surveys. The most recent community workshop was held on November 20, 2014, and was focused on housing, including Housing law requirements, potential Housing Element sites, and how the http://www.cupertinogpa.org/app_pages/view/13 C C 12 /2- 12/2/2014 2 12/2/2014 Frequently Asked Questions Below are answers to some frequently asked questions about the General Plan Amendment and Housing Element Update projects, and local School District enrollment projections and operations. The City will continue to update the FAQs as the projects move forward, so please check back often. Last updated December 1, 2014 General Plan Amendment FAQs 1. What is a General Plan? The General Plan is a regulatory document that includes goals and policies that set the "ground rules" for conserving resources, designing new projects, expanding public services and improving community amenities. It covers a wide variety of issues, ranging from urban design and mobility to public health and safety. Every city in California is required to adopt and regularly update a General Plan. It functions as the City's primary regulatory document and must be used as the basis for all { planning -related decisions. The City's current General Plan, which was adopted in 2005, can be viewed here. t COntaCC USI (or,rfioretn#ormation 2. Why is the City amending the current General Plan? In August 2012, the City Council directed staff to begin a General Plan amendment to replenish citywide office, commercial, and hotel development allocations, consolidate individual General Plan amendment requests from property owners, and review the future of the Vallco Shopping District, In November 2013, upon receiving the final regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) numbers for Cupertino (explained later in the Housing Element FAQ section), the City initiated an update of the State -mandated Housing Element of the General Plan. The 2012-2022 Housing Element, which is a required component of the General Plan, identifies policies and locations for future housing in Cupertino. The Housing Element Update was combined with the General Plan - - - - - - - Amendment process so the City and community could fully evaluate and discuss issues in one comprehensive outreach and planning process. 3. How long is the process to amend the General Plan? The General Plan Amendment process is anticipated to take 18 months, starting in March 2013 and concluding with City Council adoption of the amended plan in late 2014. The schedule for the Housing Element is mandated by the State and is discussed in the Housing Element FAQs. For the General Plan Amendment and Housing Element process and schedule, please visit the Schedule page. 4. How has the City engaged the community in the amendment process? Throughout the General Plan Amendment process, the City has engaged local residents, property owners and business owners in order to gather their valuable thoughts, expectations and concerns about the future of Cupertino. Opportunities for engagement have included postcards sent to every postal customer in Cupertino, community workshops, online comment forms, neighborhood meetings and surveys. The most recent community workshop was held on November 20, 2014, and was focused on housing, including Housing law requirements, potential Housing Element sites, and how the http://www.cupertinogpa.org/app_pages/view/13 C C 12 /2- 12/2/2014 2 12/2/2014 Frequently Asked Questions : City of Cupertino General Plan A... Page 2 of 9 school districts plan for new housing. The Planning Commission and City Council have also held several meetings specifically related to the project. Please visit the Events page to view upcoming opportunities for input, and visit the homepage to view materials from previous workshops and meetings. 5. How has community input been used during this General Plan Amendment process? Community input has been integral throughout the General Plan Amendment and Housing Element process. Through workshop discussions, interactive exercises and online surveys, community input has helped to shape the Concept Alternatives Report (including the draft 2040 Community Vision and Guiding Principles) on topics including the type and location of new land uses, heights and densities, and has also been used to develop emerging General Plan policy changes. This input is reflected in the Workshop #1 Summary and the Mobility and Design Concepts Summary. All materials and comments received from these community forums and events, including the recent November 20, 2014. Community Workshoo, are provided to the City Council for their review and consideration. 6. Was there an environmental review prepared for the project? Yes. The City is required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to consider the physical changes that could result as a consequence of the project. To provide a comprehensive environmental analysis, one environmental document, referred to as an Environmental Impact Report or EIR, was prepared for both the General Plan Amendment and Housing Element Update. A copy of the full EIR is available here. 7. Are other public agencies involved in the General Plan Amendment process? While the General Plan is ultimately a City document that is specific to Cupertino, many other public agencies are involved directly or indirectly in both its implementation and ultimate success. These agencies include Cupertino Union School District, Fremont Union High School District, De Anza College, adjacent cities and many others. The City has met with these agencies throughout the process, and these agencies will have opportunities to provide feedback and comments on the project. In addition to the local agencies, the General Plan must also consider and address requirements from larger regional agencies such as the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), and Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). Additional details about these agencies are provided in the questions and responses below. 8. What is the Association of Bay Area Governments and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission? The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) is a regional planning agency that is comprised of the various local governments (9 counties and 101 cities) throughout the Bay Area. The agency primarily deals with regional land use, housing, environmental quality and economic development issues. You can learn more about their responsibilities and structure by visiting: www.abag.ca.gov. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is a regional agency that is responsible for the planning and financing of major transportation projects in the nine -county Bay Area. You can learn more about their responsibilities and structure by visiting: www.mtc.ca.gov. 9. What authority do ABAG and MTC have in Cupertino? Cupertino, along with all nine counties and 101 cities in the Bay Area, is a member of both ABAG and MTC. As advisory organizations, ABAG and MTC have limited statuary authority in Cupertino. ABAG and MTC's objective is to promote a more efficient, equitable and environmentally sustainable region http://www.cupertinogpa.org/app_pages/view/13 12/2/2014 Frequently Asked Questions : City of Cupertino General Plan A... Page 3 of 9 through partnerships with city and county governments. Ultimately, the two organizations are governing bodies which oversee the regional planning needs of the entire Bay Area. 10. What is Plan Bay Area and how does it affect Cupertino? Plan Bay Area is a long-range plan to accommodate future population growth in the region while reducing greenhouse gas emissions from cars and light trucks. Plan Bay Area was prepared and adopted by ABAG and MTC, and is a direct result of California's 2008 Senate Bill 375 which requires the state's 18 metropolitan areas to develop Sustainable Communities Strategies (SCS).Plan Bay Area affects the City of Cupertino directly in that the regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) targets assigned to Cupertino by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) were based on population projections in Plan Bay Area. For more information related to RHNA and ABAG, please refer to the Housing Element FAQs. The plan advocates the expansion of housing and employment near areas with multi -modal transportation choices (i.e., transit, auto, bicycle and pedestrian) in order to create healthier communities and ultimately a stronger regional economy. While the plan is advisory to Cupertino, certain development and transportation projects can receive regulatory streamlining and grant funding if they are consistent with Plan Bay Area. 11. What is the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority and what do they do? The Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) is a special purpose district that oversees public transit services, congestion management, certain highway improvement projects and countywide transportation planning for Santa Clara County. VTA operates three light rail lines, bus lines and paratransit. You can learn more about their responsibilities and structure by visiting: www.vta.org. 12. What is the current status of the Bus Rapid Transit project? VTA is currently analyzing ways to improve transit service along Santa Clara County's three busiest transit corridors with some level of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). This includes upgrades along Stevens Creek Boulevard from De Anza College to downtown San Jose. This is a potential project for VTA, and more information is available at: www.vta.org/stevens-creek-brt. It is anticipated that this project will consist of improvements in technology and infrastructure as well as new vehicles allowing riders to travel faster and more comfortably with more frequent service and improved reliability. While VTA is analyzing several options for improved transit service (including infrastructure/technology upgrades and a dedicated lane of travel for VTA vehicles), each City in which changes may be proposed has the authority to determine which improvements will be allowed within the City's right-of-way. 13. How can I get involved and provide input? We want to hear from you! We encourage you to participate by attending workshops and public meetings, completing surveys, and submitting your comments either through the website or by contacting City staff (see information below). Housing Element FAQs 1. What is a Housing Element and why do we need it? According to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD): "State law recognizes the vital role local governments play in the Supply and affordability of housing. Each governing body (City Council or Board of Supervisors) of a local government in California is required to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the city, city and County, or county. The housing element is one of the seven http://www.cupei-tinogpa.org/app_pages/view/13 12/2/2014 Frequently Asked Questions : City of Cupertino General Plan A... Page 4 of 9 mandated elements of the local general plan. Housing element law, enacted in 1969, mandates that local governments adequately plan to meet the existing and projected housing needs of all economic segments of the community. The law acknowledges that, in order for the private market to adequately address housing needs and demand, local governments must adopt land use plans and regulatory systems which provide opportunities for, and do not unduly constrain, housing development. As a result, housing policy in the State rests largely upon the effective implementation of local general plans and, in particular, local housing elements. Housing element law also requires the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) review local housing elements for compliance with State law and to report its written findings to the local government." Having a Housing Element that is approved by City Council and certified by the HCD also allows the City to apply and be competitive for state -funded grants and loans that support local housing programs. 2. Why is the City updating the Housing Element? State law requires that the Housing Element be updated periodically. The cycle for updating the Housing Element in past cycles have ranged between five years to ten years depending on the region and the Housing Element cycle. Past cycles for the Bay Area have been as follows: • First cycle — 1980-1990 (ten-year cycle) • Second cycle — 1988-1995 (seven-year cycle — contains overlap with previous cycle) • Third cycle — 1999-2006 (seven-year cycle) • Fourth cycle — 2007-2014 (seven-year cycle) • Fifth (current) cycle — 2014-2022 (eight-year cycle). 3. Why is the planning period for the Housing Element eight years now instead of seven? As a result of Senate Bill 375, which was signed by the Governor in late 2008, the planning period for the Housing Element increased from seven to eight years. 4. How did SB 375 change the Housing Element process? With the change to the Housing Element planning period from seven to eight years, cities and counties are now required to coordinate planning for future housing development along with regional transportation and land use planning that is part of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) process. The goal is to promote sustainable development by placing new housing near jobs, services and transit in order to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and greenhouse gas emissions. 5. What must be included in a Housing Element? The requirements for local housing elements are specified in Government Code Sections 65583 — 65583.2. The primary requirements are listed below: • Analysis of existing needs, including the number of people living in substandard or overcrowded housing, people paying more for their homes than they can sustainably afford, people with special housing needs, and affordable units at risk of converting to market rate. • Analysis of projected needs, including the allocation of income -specific housing needs developed by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). A site inventory that is adequate to meet a jurisdiction's regional housing needs allocation (RHNA) where housing development is allowed at appropriate densities to meet the required affordability requirements (discussed later). Analysis of government controls on housing development. Programs, policies and objectives that the city will adopt to assist the development of housing for different income and special needs groups, ensure equal housing opportunity, and preserve and improve the existing housing stock. http://www.cupertinogpa.org/app_pages/view/1 3 12/2/2014 Frequently Asked Questions : City of Cupertino General Plan A... Page 5 of 9 6. What is the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) in the Housing Element and who decides? State law requires each city and county to plan for their "fair share" of the region's housing needs, including affordable units. The fair share is determined as follows: • HCD is required to determine the regional housing needs allocation (RHNA), by income category, for each Council of Governments (COG) in a metropolitan area. RHNA is based on Department of Finance population projections and regional population forecasts used in preparing regional transportation plans. The COGS are required to allocate to each locality a share of housing need totaling the RHNA for each income category. For the nine -County San Francisco Bay Area (which also includes 101 cities), the COG is the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). 7. How does ABAG allocate the RHNA? ABAG convenes a Housing Methodology Committee for every RHNA cycle to determine the methodology to allocate units among various jurisdictions. For the 2014-2022 Housing Element cycle, the formula for distribution was based on Plan Bay Area (discussed below) ABAG uses a formula with weighted criteria to accomplish housing objectives and allocates the housing units. Recently ABAG has also focused on locating growth near public transportation nodes to minimize greenhouse gas emissions as mandated by the State per SB 375 (a law adopted in 2008). The method for the current allocation can be found at: http://www.abag.ca.gov/planning/housingneeds/methodology.html. 8. What is Cupertino's RHNA for the 2014-2022 planning cycle and how does it compare with the requirements of past cycles for Cupertino? Cupertino's RHNA allocation for the 2014-2022 planning period is 1,064 residential units. The allocation of residential units by affordability is shown in the following table: Income Category i Very Low Low Moderate Above -Moderate Total Housing Need i i 356 207 231 270 1064* Since January 1, 2014, 30 residential units have been constructed in Cupertino. Also, 32 second units were built during the last planning cycle. This number is anticipated to be the same for the 2014-2022 planning cycle, and therefore, the City may take credit for 32 units. As a result of the 30 constructed units and 32 second unit credits, the resulting RHNA target is now 1,002 residential units. For comparison purposes, the following table identifies the City's RHNA requirements of past cycles: Planning Cycle Total Very Low Low Moderate I Above Moderate 1980-1990 3,386 542 474 677 i i 1,693 1988-1995 3,174 508 444 635 �I 1,587 http://www.cupertinogpa.org/app_pages/view/13 12/2/2014 Frequently Asked Questions : City of Cupertino General Plan A... Page 6 of 9 2001-2006 2,720 412 198 644 1,466 2007-2014 1,170 3341 229 243 357 2014-2022 1,064 356 207 231 270 When updating a Housing Element, HCD is recommending that cities identify sites that can accommodate more than the minimum number of housing units required; up to 25%-40% above the RHNA, particularly if those sites are mixed-use sites or already developed with existing buildings. The surplus ensures that cities and counties meet the minimum RHNA requirement even if some of the housing sites are developed with non-residential uses. The recommendation is in response to a revision to State Housing Element law in 2009 which includes a 'no net loss provision. The "no nerioss" provision generally states that if a housing site is developed with fewer units than shown in the Housing Element, the City must either make a finding that the remaining sites identified in the Housing Element are adequate to meet the regional need or find other sites to replace the units to make up the RHNA. As a result, the recommendation is to adopt a list of sites equivalent to about 1,400 units. 9. How does Cupertino's RHNA compare with the RHNA of other cities/jurisdictions in Santa Clara County? The table below shows how Cupertino ranks in comparison with other cities in the County with respect to existing and projected population and the corresponding RHNA targets. It is interesting to note that while Cupertino's population is 3.27% of Santa Clara County, the City's RHNA represents only 1.8% of the region's total housing need for the planning cycle. This may reflect a shift in the allocation methodology towards encouraging growth in areas where public transportation nodes currently exist. The final allocation data by jurisdiction/county for the nine county Bay Area region can be found at: www.abag.ca.gov/planning/housing needs/data.html. 10. Is the City required to build all the units identified in its share of the RHNA? No, the City does not have to build these units. The City does have to ensure that it has a sufficient supply of land zoned to accommodate the units identified in its share of the RHNA. For the City's lower-income portion of the RHNA, the City must have vacant or underutilized land that is zoned residential or residential mixed-use at a density of 20 dwelling units per acre or higher (20 du/ac). http://www.cupertinogpa.org/app_pages/view/13 12/2/2014 Frequently Asked Questions : City of Cupertino General Plan A... Page 7 of 9 11. What is the City's obligation regarding affordable housing? State law requires cities to demonstrate that there are sufficient sites available that can accommodate the amount of housing need identified in the RHNA. Zoning that allows a density of 20 units per acre or more is considered appropriate for affordable housing for Santa Clara County. 12. Who prepares and reviews the Housing Element? The City of Cupertino prepares and adopts the Housing Element, but it must also be certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for compliance with State law. 13. What happens if Cupertino does not adopt a Housing Element by January 31, 2015 (plus 120 -day grace period) or the Element does not comply with State law? Over the years, the State of California has steadily increased the penalties for not having a legally compliant Housing Element. If HCD finds that the City has failed to comply with the State's Housing Element Law, there can be serious consequences that could include: 1. Limited access to State Funding. When reviewing and approving funding applications, both the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (CIEDB) and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) take into consideration whether or not the community has a certified Housing Element. 2. Lawsuits from developers and housing advocates. A number of Bay Area cities have been successfully sued including Menlo Park, Corte Madera, Pittsburg, Pleasanton, Alameda, Benicia, Fremont, Rohnert Park, Berkeley, Napa County and Santa Rosa. Potential consequences of being sued could include: Mandatory compliance — The court may order Cupertino to bring the Housing Element into compliance within 120 days, which limits community input. Suspension of local control on building matters — The court may suspend the City's authority to issue building permits or grant zoning changes, variances or subdivision map approvals. Court approval of housing developments — The court may step in and approve housing projects, including large projects the community may not want. Payment of attorney fees - If Cupertino faces a court action stemming from a lack of compliance and either loses or settles the case, we may have to pay substantial attorney fees to the plaintiffs attorneys in addition to the fees paid to our own attorneys. These fees can easily exceed $100,000. 3. Carryover of unfilled housing allocation. If the City fails to identify or make available adequate sites to accommodate our assigned RHNA target, we would be required to carry over the unfilled housing allocation into the next housing element planning period. Therefore, in addition to identifying sites for the new period's RHNA, the City would also be required within the first year of the new planning period to zone adequate sites to accommodate the RHNA from the prior planning period that was not provided. Per State law, if a local government on an eight-year planning cycle fails to adopt the housing element within 120 days of the statutory due date (January 31, 2015), the jurisdiction is required to update the housing element every four years until adopting at least two consecutive revisions by the applicable due dates. Therefore, if the City does not adopt a housing element for 2015-2023 by May 31, 2015 (which includes the 120 -day grace period), it will be required to adopt a housing element every four years (in 2010 and, again, in 2023). 14. What happens if the City does not rezone Housing Element sites at the time of Housing Element adoption? If the current zoning for a City does not provide adequate sites for all income groups to meet the regional need, the Housing Element must include a program to rezone sites within three years. As mentioned earlier, sites with a land use and zoning designation that allows a minimum of 20 dwelling units per acre qualify as affordable housing sites. If any site is not rezoned within the required timeframe, the City cannot disapprove a project on the site if it is consistent with the Housing Element. http://www. cupet-tinogpa. org/app_pages/view/13 12/2/2014 Frequently Asked Questions : City of Cupertino General Plan A... Page 8 of 9 15. How does the City's Housing Element process align with the General Plan Amendment process currently underway? The Housing Element Update was combined with the General Plan Amendment process so the City and community could fully evaluate and discuss issues in one comprehensive outreach and planning process. Both projects are also evaluated under one Environmental Impact Report (EIR). In order for either process to move forward and be approved, the City Council must first certify the EIR for compliance with state environmental law. 16. Is the GPA required to be adopted with the Housing Element? Because the Housing Element is a chapter of the General Plan, updating the Housing Element essentially requires amending the General Plan. State law requires that all the elements of the General Plan be internally consistent. In addition, the General Plan also includes update policy language to reflect revisions required per State law, to describe new legislation and requirements that apply to the City. Therefore, the update policy language in the General Plan which relates to State requirements and amendments related to the Housing Element and Housing Element sites would have to be adopted in order to ensure that the Housing Element and the rest of the General Plan are consistent. 17. How can you get involved and stay informed? The public will have multiple opportunities for participation in this process, including community workshops and public meetings. For more information, please refer to the Get Involved! page. We would love to hear from you! School District FAQs The following questions were generated at the November 20, 2014, Community Workshop. The responses below are provided by the Fremont Union High School District. Responses from the Cupertino Union School District will be added once available. 1. Do apartment complexes pay one parcel tax? Parcel taxes are generally approved in California as a fixed amount for each parcel of land as defined by the assessor's office within the school district attendance area. General bonds are normally based on the assessed value of the property so the amount paid is larger for high priced parcels of land. So the short answer is "yes'. We are aware that parcel taxes are regressive and in certain ways unfair, but they are unfortunately a major way schools currently have to raise funds for operating costs. 2. How do rising home prices/rents affect student enrollment? For the Fremont Union High School District, we can say with some certainty that higher academic achievement in local schools tend to positively affect housing values and rents. There appears to be a very strong correlation that higher performing schools increase housing values. The effect on housing prices and student enrollment is harder to predict in our opinion. Home prices in the Cupertino and Sunnyvale area have generally outperformed the real estate market while we have simultaneously experienced an increase in enrollment. A byproduct of rising housing costs in the future could be that some families will not be able to afford to move or live here which would impact student enrollment. 3. Do projections take renters into account? What is the number of children per apartment complex? Yes, the Fremont Union High School District projections do include students that live in rental units. The student generation rate for apartment complexes is different from single-family homes and also differs within the type and age of multi -unit complexes. The demographer that works with the http://www.cupertinogpa.org/app_pages/view/13 12/2/2014 f Frequently Asked Questions : City of Cupertino General Plan A... Page 9 of 9 Fremont Union High School District understands the nuances that exist within these differences and confirms that older multi -unit complexes tend to have a higher student generation rate than the newer and often smaller units associated with newer multi -unit developments. 4. Do development fees cover costs for school facility needs? Is it a fact that the more development equals more taxes? Developer fee amounts are governed by the State. The fees do help defray some cost but they do not cover the full cost of the enrollment growth in all cases. 5. Cupertino High shows continuous growth —why add more housing? The number of students attending Cupertino High School is increasing but for many years it was the smallest school in the Fremont Union High School District. Currently Cupertino High School has approximately 2,150 students which is very similar in size to Fremont High School and smaller than Monta Vista and Homestead High Schools. 6. Do projections adjust after large housing developments get built? What are the true numbers? Yes, the projections and student generation are adjusted annually based on experience. 7. Do high density residential projects impact schools? Are parcel taxes in response to increased density? Student generation rates per unit are generally the highest for single family homes. High density residential projects generally have a lower generation rate per unit but since they are "dense" they tend to have more units per square foot of land. If you would like to receive updates and future emails and notifications about the General Plan Amendment process, including the Housing Element please sign up and provide yourcontact Information here. • ©2013 City of Cupertino • Accessibility Privacy Policy • Contact Us Email Settings http://www.cupei-tinogpa.org/app_pages/view/13 12/2/2014 CITY -COUNTY HOUSING ELEMENT LITIGATION' COUNTIES SUED BY HUMBOLDT SUNSHINE, INC., A COALITION OF DEVELOPERS, BECAUSE THE HOUSING ELEMENT WAS OUT OF COMPLIANCE. HOUSING ADVOCACY GROUP HOUSING FOR ALL INTERVENED. THE COUNTY SETTLED WITH HOUSING FOR ALL IN 2011. THE SETTLEMENT PROVIDED A TIMELINE FOR COMPLETION OF THE MULTIFAMILY REZONING EFFORT IN ORDER TO AVOID A COURT -IMPOSED BUILDING MORATORIUM. THE COUNTY DID NOT OBTAIN ITS RECERTIFICATION FOR ITS HOUSING ELEMENT BY AUG. 15, 2011, SO THE HUMBOLDT COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT IMPOSED A BUILDING MORATORIUM THAT TOOK EFFECT IN OCTOBER 2011. COUNTYuOF`MADERA LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE OVER 20 YEARS AGO FOR FAILING TO ADOPT AN UPDATED HOUSING ELEMENT WITHIN THE APPLICABLE TIME PERIOD. COURT ORDERED COUNTY TO PAY $150,000 IN ATTORNEYS' FEES. COUNTY OF MENDOCINO LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY LEGAL SERVICES AND CALIFORNIA AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAW PROJECT. STATE HCD REQUIRED COUNTY TO REZONE 40 ACRES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING. COUNTY SITES WERE NOT PHYSICALLY OR REALISTICALLY CAPABLE OF ACCOMMODATING AFFORDABLE HOUSING. SETTLEMENT IMPLEMENTED A DEVELOPMENT MORATORIUM IF HCD DID NOT CERTIFY THE COUNTY'S HOUSING ELEMENT. ATTORNEYS' FEES AWARDED FOR PRE -LITIGATION WORK BASED ON PUBLIC BENEFIT THEORY. HCD HAS CONDITIONALLY CERTIFIED THE COUNTY'S CURRENT HOUSING ELEMENT, BUT THE COURT MONITORS ONGOING COUNTY COMPLIANCE. 1 BASED ON LIST ORIGINALLY PREPARED BY SANTA BARBARA COUNTY IN 2007 AND UPDATED BY GOLDFARB & LIPMAN LLP BASED ON AVAILABLE INFORMATION; NOT ALL OUTCOMES ARE KNOWN, AND NOT ALL CASES ARE INCLUDED. ITEMS MODIFIED BY GOLDFARB & LIPMAN ARE IGHIIGHTEps 1098\01\655305.6 7/28/2014 LAWSUIT BROUGHT IN 2004 BY CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE AND PUBLIC ADVOCATES, INC. STIPULATED JUDGMENT: THE COUNTY AGREED TO (1) MAKE ADEQUATE PROVISION FOR LOW INCOME AND FARMWORKER HOUSING IN ITS GENERAL PLAN, (2) IDENTIFY AND REZONE SITES TO ACCOMMODATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AND (3) ALLOCATE FUNDS FROM ITS TRUST FUND FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING. COURT ORDERED MORATORIA ON DEVELOPMENT. THE COUNTY WAS ORDERED TO PAY ATTORNEYS' FEES. A SECOND LAWSUIT WAS FILED BY LATINOS UNIDOS DEL VALLE DE NAPA Y SOLANO (REPRESENTED BY DAVID GRABILL, CRLA, PUBLIC INTEREST LAW PROJECT, AND A WASHINGTON D.C. LAW FIRM) IN SEPTEMBER 2009 AFTER COUNTY ADOPTED NEW HOUSING ELEMENT IN JUNE 2009. COURT OF APPEAL IN AN UNPUBLISHED DECISION FOUND HOUSING ELEMENT TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW IN EFFECT IN 2008 (WHICH REQUIRED SITE SPECIFICITY). LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY LEGAL SERVICES BECAUSE THE COUNTY FAILED TO IMPLEMENT ITS HOUSING ELEMENT. IN 1996, THE COURT RULED AGAINST THE COUNTY, RESULTING IN A STIPULATED JUDGMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE HOUSING ELEMENT. SUBSTANTIAL ATTORNEYS' FEES AWARDED. THE COURT ORDERED THE COUNTY TO ADOPT UPGRADED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS AND ENACT AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING CODE TO ENSURE THAT MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS AND EMERGENCY SHELTERS ARE REVIEWED THROUGH A SIMPLIFIED PROCESS. (AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAW PROJECT STATES 430 ACRES REZONED TO ACCOMMODATE 7,000 UNITS. THE COUNTY SELF-IMPOSED BUILDING MORATORIA IN THE VACANT LAND INVENTORY, EXCEPT MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCES ON LANDS ZONED LIMITED COMMERCIAL OR SHOPPING CENTER. LATER, THE COUNTY VOLUNTARILY ADOPTED AN INCLUSIONARY ZONING ORDINANCE. THE COUNTY ADOPTED A NEW HOUSING ELEMENT IN 2008, WHICH RENDERED THE SETTLEMENT MOOT. 1098\01\655305.6 7/28/2014 RAMIREZ-MENDOZA V. COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ (SUPER. CT. SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, 1994, NO. 129871). LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE AND CALIFORNIA AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAW PROJECT IN 1994. THE COUNTY CLAIMED IT COULD MEET ALL OF ITS LOW-INCOME HOUSING NEEDS THROUGH SECONDARY UNITS. THE SUIT WAS DISMISSED. SECOND LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE AND CALIFORNIA AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAW PROJECT IN 2004. THE SUPERIOR COURT FOUND THAT THE COUNTY HAD NOT COMPLIED WITH STATE LAW IN TERMS OF FULFILLING THE REQUIREMENTS THAT DEVELOPMENT BY -RIGHT BE ALLOWED ON SITES DESIGNATED TO MEET THE RHNA. COUNTY ORDERED TO ADOPT A VALID HOUSING ELEMENT WITHIN 120 DAYS. THE COUNTY REZONED MORE THAN 30 ACRES OF LAND AT 20 UNITS/ACRE SUITABLE FOR BUILDING AFFORDABLE HOUSING, ALLOCATED $15 MILLION TOWARDS THOSE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS, AND INCLUDED APPROPRIATE LANGUAGE REGARDING THE BY -RIGHT REQUIREMENT. SUED BY SONOMA COUNTY HOUSING ADVOCACY GROUP IN 1998. COURT ORDERED MORATORIUM ON ALL DEVELOPMENT UNTIL THE COUNTY ATTAINED A STATE CERTIFIED HOUSING ELEMENT. SUBSEQUENT STIPULATION ALLOWED APPROVAL OF PENDING SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE CHANGES. IN RESPONSE TO THE LEGAL ACTION, THE COUNTY REVISED ITS PLAN BY IDENTIFYING SITES THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY ZONED FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USES. THE COUNTY'S HOUSING ELEMENT WAS APPROVED BY HCD. THE COUNTY WAS ORDERED TO PAY OVER $300,000 IN ATTORNEYS' FEES. COUNTY OF SUTTER LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE. COURT ORDERED CONSENT DECREE REQUIRING THE COUNTY IDENTIFY ADEQUATE SITES TO ACCOMMODATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING. 1098\01\655305.6 7/28/2014 IVORY V. COUNTY OF YUBA (SUPER. CT. YUBA COUNTY, 1995, No. 054694). LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN 1993 CLAIMING THE HOUSING ELEMENT WAS OUT OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE'S HOUSING ELEMENT LAW. THE COURT ORDERED DEFENDANT TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN'S HOUSING ELEMENT WITHIN 120 DAYS TO INCLUDE ANALYSIS OF "AT -RISK" ASSISTED HOUSING UNITS, ANALYSIS OF CONSTRAINTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING, AND A PLAN TO MITIGATE THOSE CONSTRAINTS, INCLUDING INFRASTRUCTURE CAPACITY LIMITATIONS. IN ADDITION, THE COURT ORDERED DEFENDANT TO REPEAL A COUNTY ORDINANCE SPECIFYING MOBILE HOME SIDING AND ROOFING REQUIREMENTS. FINALLY, THE COURT ENJOINED DEFENDANT FROM IMPLEMENTING THE PLUMAS LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN UNTIL AMENDED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE AMENDED HOUSING ELEMENT. COUNTY WAS ORDERED TO PAY OVER $77,000 IN ATTORNEYS' FEES. 1098\01\655305.6 7/28/2014 CITIES CITY OF MED COLLINS V. CITY OFALAMEDA. EASTBAYREG'LPARKDisT. V. CITYOFALAMEDA SUED IN FEBRUARY 2007. PLAINTIFF OWNED 9 ACRES ALONG THE WATER AND WISHED TO DEVELOP HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON A PORTION ZONED INDUSTRIAL AND DESIGNATED AS POTENTIAL PUBLIC PARK SPACE. THE ALLEGED INADEQUACY OF THE HOUSING ELEMENT WAS ONE PART OF THE LAWSUIT. PLAINTIFF ARGUED THAT THE CITY'S ZONING WAS INCONSISTENT WITH HOUSING ELEMENT LAW BECAUSE THE ZONING ORDINANCE PROHIBITED PLAINTIFF FROM DEVELOPING HIGH DENSITY RESIDENCES, WHICH WERE NEEDED TO SATISFY HOUSING ELEMENT REQUIREMENTS. THE CASE WAS SETTLED IN 2010. THE CITY APPROVED A LESS DENSE PROJECT FOR 182 UNITS. IN 2012 THE CITY ADOPTED A HOUSING ELEMENT THAT WAS APPROVED BY HCD. THE CITY HAS NOW BEEN SUED BY THE EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT REGARDING THE REZONING OF A SITE FOR `BY RIGHT' HOUSING ADJACENT TO DISTRICT PROPERTY. AFFORDABLE HOUSINGADVOCATES V. CITYOFALBANY SUIT BROUGHT IN 2013 BY ALAMEDA COUNTY LEGAL AID AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST LAW PROJECT, ALLEGING THAT CITY HAD NOT REVISED ITS GENERAL PLAN SINCE 1992. CITY ADOPTED NEW HOUSING ELEMENT IN MARCH 2014, WHICH WAS FOUND BY HCD TO COMPLY WITH STATE LAW. LAWSUIT AMENDED TO CHALLENGE CITY'S AND HCD'S INTERPRETATION OF CARRYOVER PROVISIONS IN AB 1233 (G.C. SECTION 65584.09). PENDING IN ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. CITY OF 13ENICIA LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY CALIFORNIA AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAW PROJECT. STATE HCD CERTIFIED THE CITY'S HOUSING ELEMENT "BASED ON PAPER." CAHLP TOOK PICTURES OF SITES THE CITY IDENTIFIED. SOME WERE UNDER WATER; OTHER WERE ALREADY DEVELOPED. HCD RESCINDED THEIR CERTIFICATION. CITY SETTLED AFTER 6 MONTHS OF LITIGATION. THE CITY WAS ORDERED TO PAY $90,000 IN ATTORNEYS' FEES. A NEW CITY COUNCIL REFUSED TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENT, APPEALED THE COURT'S JUDGMENT THREE TIMES, AND LOST ON EVERY APPEAL. THE CITY EXPENDED $500,000 IN ATTORNEYS' FEES. 1098\01\655305.6 7/28/2014 SETTLEMENT EXCEEDED THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE LAW. LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE ON BEHALF OF LOW-INCOME LATINO RESIDENTS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING. SETTLED THE CASE FOR $360,000 IN ATTORNEYS FEES. THE SETTLEMENT ALSO REQUIRED THE CITY TO AMEND ITS GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE TO ENSURE ADEQUATE SITES TO ACCOMMODATE REGIONAL HOUSING NEEDS FOR LOW- AND VERY LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS; AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO PERMIT HOUSING FOR SPECIAL -NEEDS POPULATIONS INCLUDING MIGRANT FARMWORKERS; REQUIRE AT LEAST 15 PERCENT OF ALL NEW RESIDENTIAL UNITS TO BE AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND AT LEAST 40 PERCENT OF THESE UNITS TO BE VERY LOW- INCOME UNITS; INCREASE THE REDEVELOPMENT HOUSING SET ASIDE TO 25 PERCENT OF ANNUAL TAX INCREMENT; AND AMEND ITS REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TO COMPLY WITH RELOCATION AND REPLACEMENT HOUSING REQUIREMENTS. SUED IN 2009 AND 2010 BY A PRIVATE DEVELOPER WHO ARGUED RECENTLY ADOPTED HOUSING ELEMENT WAS INADEQUATE. BOTH LAWSUITS WERE EITHER DISMISSED OR SETTLED PRIOR TO GOING TO TRIAL. FRIENDS OFAVL4RA V. CITY OF CARLSBAD (2012) 210 CAL. APP. 4TH 1103. RESIDENTS SUED THE CITY ALLEGING THAT THE REZONING PROGRAM IN THE HOUSING ELEMENT WAS INCONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN. THE COURT HELD THAT THE HOUSING ELEMENT STATUTE ANTICIPATED THAT THERE COULD BE INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE HOUSING ELEMENT AND GENERAL PLAN, SO LONG AS THE HOUSING ELEMENT CONTAINED A TIMELINE FOR RESOLVING THE INCONSISTENCIES. LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY LEGAL AID AND PUBLIC ADVOCATES, INC. FOR NOT HAVING A CERTIFIED HOUSING ELEMENT. THE TOWN SETTLED THE LAWSUIT ON THE CONDITION THAT THE TOWN ADOPT A STATE CERTIFIED HOUSING ELEMENT AND IMPOSE A FEE ON COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO FUND AFFORDABLE HOUSING. IT ALSO CREATED THREE NEW ZONING DISTRICTS THAT EITHER REQUIRED AFFORDABLE 1098\01\655305.6 7/28/2014 HOUSING OR OFFERED INCENTIVES FOR AFFORDABLE UNITS. THE TOWN ALSO AGREED TO SIMPLIFY PROCEDURES AND WAIVE MANY FEES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPERS. COURT ISSUED INJUNCTION PROHIBITING THE TOWN FROM APPROVING ANYTHING BUT AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ON 10 KEY SITES UNTIL IT ATTAINED CERTIFICATION. THE HOUSING ELEMENT WAS UPDATED AND CERTIFIED BY HCD IN 2011. THE TOWN WAS ORDERED TO PAY $100,000 IN ATTORNEYS' FEES. CITYOFNCIMTAS HERNANDEZ V. CITY 0FENCINITAS (1994) 28 CAL. APP. 4TH 1048. THE CITY OF ENCINITAS WAS SUED BY SIX LOW-INCOME CITY RESIDENTS ALLEGING THAT ITS HOUSING ELEMENT FAILED TO CONFORM WITH STATE LAW. THE COURT FOUND THAT THE HOUSING ELEMENT SUBSTANTIALLY CONFORMED WITH STATE LAW, INCLUDING DESIGNATING ADEQUATE SITES AND ADEQUATELY ANALYZING FARMWORKER AND HOMELESS NEEDS. LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY LEGAL SERVICES ALLEGING THAT CITY DID NOT HAVE A VALID HOUSING ELEMENT. A STIPULATED JUDGMENT REQUIRED THE CITY T0. REZONE 128 ACRES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING, TO CREATE INCENTIVES FOR DEVELOPERS, AND TO CREATE AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING TRUST FUND. CITY INCREASED RDA PERCENTAGE FOR HOUSING TO 25%. EMERGENCY SHELTERS WERE ALLOWED BY -RIGHT. CITY WAS AGAIN SUED IN 2011 WHEN IT REPEALED ITS MANDATORY INCLUSIONARY ORDINANCE. PETITIONER'S CONTENTION WAS THAT THE CITY WAS REQUIRED TO AMEND ITS HOUSING ELEMENT WHEN IT REPEALED THE ORDINANCE AS IT I -LAD LISTED IN ITS QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVES SECTION UNITS ARISING FROM THE IHO. THE COURT HELD THAT THE REPEAL OF THE INCLUSIONARY ORDINANCE WAS INVALID AS INCONSISTENT WITH ITS ADOPTED HOUSING ELEMENT. A NOTICE OF APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED; THE CASE HAS BEEN ORDERED TO MEDIATION. LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY CALIFORNIA AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAW PROJECT AND LAW CENTER FOR FAMILIES IN 2002. 1098\01\655305.6 7/28/2014 SETTLEMENT COMMITTED THE CITY TO (1) REZONE 286 ACRES FOR MULTI -FAMILY HOUSING AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO MEET AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEEDS, (2) IDENTIFY SITES FOR BUILDING HOUSING THAT IS AFFORDABLE TO LOW AND VERY LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLDS, AND (3) SIGNIFICANTLY MODIFY ITS HOUSING ELEMENT TO REMOVE BARRIERS AND BETTER PLAN FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING. ATTORNEYS FEES APPROXIMATELY $160,000. FONSECA V. CITY OF GILROY (2007) 148 CAL. APP. 4TH 1174. LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY CALIFORNIA AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAW PROJECT, CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE, AND PUBLIC ADVOCATES, INC. COURT RULED THAT GILROY'S GENERAL PLAN SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLIED WITH FORMER HOUSING ELEMENT LAW - THE LAW THAT WAS IN EFFECT WHEN GILROY ADOPTED ITS HOUSING ELEMENT. (PRIOR TO 2004, THE LAW DID NOT REQUIRE SITE SPECIFICITY.) LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY SONOMA COUNTY HOUSING ADVOCACY GROUP AND CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN 1993. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT REQUIRED THE CITY TO REZONE PARCELS, ANNEX OTHERS, AND ENACT ZONING ORDINANCES TO ENCOURAGE AFFORDABLE HOUSING. THE CITY WAS ORDERED TO PAY ATTORNEYS' FEES OF $75,000. LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY LEGAL SERVICES. COURT ORDERED MORATORIA ON ALL DEVELOPMENT UNTIL THE CITY ATTAINED A STATE CERTIFIED HOUSING ELEMENT. NO CURRENTLY PENDING HOUSING LITIGATION OR COURT ORDER AGAINST THE CITY. 1098\01\655305.6 7/28/2014 LAWSUIT BROUGHT IN 2012 BY PUBLIC ADVOCATES, INC. AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST LAW PROJECT REPRESENTING PENINSULA INTERFAITH ACTION, UNITED HABITAT PROGRAM, AND YOUTH UNITED FOR COMMUNITY ACTION FOR NOT ADOPTING HOUSING ELEMENT SINCE 1992. THE CITY AGREED TO A SETTLEMENT IN MAY 2012, INCLUDING ADOPTION OF A VALID HOUSING ELEMENT BY MARCH 2013, IMPLEMENTING ANY REQUIRED REZONING, AND GIVING PRIORITY TO NON-PROFIT HOUSING DEVELOPERS IN ALLOCATING LOCAL FUNDS. MEJL4 V. CITY OF MISSION VIEJO LAWSUIT BROUGHT IN 2006 BY PUBLIC LAW CENTER, CALIFORNIA AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAW PROJECT OF THE PUBLIC INTEREST LAW PROJECT, AND LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF ORANGE COUNTY ALLEGING THE CITY'S HOUSING ELEMENT FAILED TO SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLY WITH STATE LAW AND THE CITY HAD FAILED TO IMPLEMENT OR AMEND ITS HOUSING ELEMENT, AFTER HCD DE- CERTIFIED THE CITY'S HOUSING ELEMENT BECAUSE THE CITY DID NOT REZONE SITES TO ACCOMMODATE 94 LOWER INCOME UNITS, AND THE CITY REJECTED AN AFFORDABLE RENTAL HOUSING PROPOSAL FOR ONE OF THOSE SITES IN 2004 WHICH WOULD HAVE MET THE CITY'S OUTSTANDING RHNA FOR LOWER INCOME UNITS. COURT ISSUED A WRIT OF MANDATE ORDERING THE CITY TO AMEND ITS HOUSING ELEMENT WITHIN 120 DAYS TO IDENTIFY ADEQUATE SITES TO ACCOMMODATE THE IMMEDIATE DEVELOPMENT OF 75 VERY LOW- AND 19 LOW-INCOME HOUSING UNITS TO MEET THE CITY'S OUTSTANDING REGIONAL HOUSING NEED OF 94 UNITS AND BRING THE HOUSING ELEMENT INTO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW. THE COURT ALSO ORDERED MORATORIA ON THE 3 SITES THE CITY HAD IDENTIFIED BUT NOT REZONED FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING. THE CITY AMENDED ITS HOUSING ELEMENT AND THE COURT APPROVED IT AS IN COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW. THE CITY PAID OVER $80,000 IN ATTORNEYS' FEES. CITY SUED IN 2012 BY DEVELOPER ALLEGING THAT HIS PROPERTY WAS REQUIRED TO BE REZONED PURSUANT TO A POLICY IN THE CITY'S HOUSING ELEMENT. CASE IS PENDING IN SANTA CLARA SUPERIOR COURT. 1098\01\655305.6 7128/2014 DEVELOPER FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE IN 2008 TO ORDER CITY TO PREPARE OVERDUE HOUSING ELEMENT. CITY ADOPTED ITS HOUSING ELEMENT IN JUNE 2011 AND PREVAILED ON THE WRIT OF MANDATE ACTION IN SUPERIOR COURT. GUTIERREZ V. CITY OF OXIVARD THE CITY ADOPTED A PLAN FOR A GOLF COURSE AND A RELATED PREZONING ORDINANCE, WHICH PERMITTED A GOLF COURSE, A SCHOOL, 2 CHURCHES, AND 426 RESIDENTIAL UNITS. LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY CHANNEL COUNTIES LEGAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION AND CALIFORNIA AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAW PROJECT IN 1999. PLAINTIFFS WERE VERY LOW-INCOME RESIDENTS OF THE CITY WHO CLAIMED THEY COULD NOT FIND DECENT HOUSING IN THE CITY. PARTIES AGREED TO A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WHICH REQUIRED THE CITY TO BUILD AT LEAST 54 RESIDENTIAL UMTS FOR LOW- AND VERY LOW-INCOME RESIDENTS, WITH A PREFERENCE FOR FARMWORKER FAMILIES. CITY OF PASADENA LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY CALIFORNIA AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAW PROJECT AND LEGAL SERVICES. COURT ORDERED MORATORIA ON ALL DEVELOPMENT UNTIL THE CITY ATTAINED A STATE CERTIFIED HOUSING ELEMENT. LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY CALIFORNIA AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAW PROJECT AND PUBLIC ADVOCATES, INC. IN 2002. LAWSUIT PRIMARILY INVOLVED REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AFFORDABLE HOUSING PRODUCTION REQUIREMENTS. SETTLEMENT COMMITTED THE CITY TO PRODUCE 990 UNITS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING OVER 9 YEARS. 396 OF THESE UNITS MUST BE AFFORDABLE TO VERY LOW INCOME RESIDENTS. 200 OF THESE MUST BE BUILT WITHIN 4 YEARS. CITY ALSO AGREED TO PROVIDE INCENTIVES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF LARGER UNITS, AND UNITS AFFORDABLE TO EXTREMELY LOW INCOME RESIDENTS, AND TO PROVIDE A PREFERENCE THAT ENSURES PEOPLE WHO LIVE OR WORK IN THE CITY WILL BENEFIT FROM NEW UNITS. PLAINTIFFS NOT SUCCESSFUL IN THE HOUSING ELEMENT PORTION OF THE LITIGATION. $325,000 IN ATTORNEYS FEES FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT CLAIMS. 10 1098\01\655305.6 7/28/2014 URBAN HABITAT PROGRAM V. CITY OFPLEASANTON (2008) 164 CAL. APP. 4TH 1561. LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY PUBLIC ADVOCATES, INC. COURT OF APPEALS DISMISSED THE HOUSING ELEMENT CHALLENGE AS UNTIMELY. HOWEVER, CLAIMS WERE ALLOWED TO PROCEED ALLEGING THAT, AFTER ADOPTION OF THE HOUSING ELEMENT, THE CITY'S GROWTH MANAGEMENT LAWS PREVENTED COMPLIANCE WITH HOUSING ELEMENT LAW. CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL WAS ALLOWED TO INTERVENE. SUPERIOR COURT FOUND IN MARCH 2010 THAT THE GROWTH CONTROL MEASURES WERE INCONSISTENT WITH HOUSING ELEMENT LAW. IN A SETTLEMENT, THE CITY AGREED TO: 1) ELIMINATE GROWTH CAP; 2) PREPARE AN ADEQUATE HOUSING ELEMENT; 3) ADOPT A CLIMATE ACTION PLAN; 4) ADOPT A NON- DISCRIMINATION RESOLUTION; AND 5) APPROVE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF AT LEAST 30 UNITS/ACRE AT THE HACIENDA BUSINESS PARK, INCLUDING 15% OR MINIMUM 130 UNITS OF VERY LOW INCOME FAMILY HOUSING. $1.9 MILLION IN ATTORNEYS FEES, PLUS $600,000 IN DEFENSE COSTS. LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY SONOMA COUNTY HOUSING ADVOCACY GROUP IN 2001. COURT ORDERED ROHNERT PARK TO REVISE ITS HOUSING ELEMENT FOR IMMEDIATE SUBMISSION TO HCD. ENTERED INTO SETTLEMENT; CITY AGREED TO DESIGNATE AREAS IN FUTURE ANNEXATIONS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING. THE CITY WAS ORDERED TO PAY $23,000 ATTORNEYS' FEES. HOFFMASTER V. CITYOFSANDIEGO (1997) 55 CAL. APP. 4T" 1098. THE CITY WAS SUED IN 1994 ALLEGING THAT ITS HOUSING ELEMENT FAILED TO DESIGNATE ADEQUATE SITES FOR EMERGENCY SHELTERS. TI-iE COURT OF APPEAL AGREED THAT VARIOUS ZONING ORDINANCE PROVISIONS MADE LOCATING EMERGENCY SHELTERS VERY DIFFICULT, AND THE CITY WAS ORDERED TO AMEND ITS ZONING ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SITES FOR EMERGENCY SHELTERS. 1098\01\655305.6 7/28/2014 ANOTHER LAWSUIT WAS FILED IN 2008 ALLEGING THAT THE CITY'S HOUSING ELEMENT WAS INADEQUATE. HOUSING ELEMENT UPHELD BY TRIAL COURT; NOT APPEALED. CITY SPENT OVER $250,000 DEFENDING LAWSUIT. ST. VINCENT'SSCHOOL FOR BOYS V. CITYOFSANRAFAEL (2008) 161 CAL. APP. 4TH 989. SUED BY A DEVELOPER WHO WANTED HIS PROPERTY ANNEXED TO THE CITY AND ARGUED THAT THE CITY DID NOT HAVE ADEQUATE HOUSING SITES UNLESS HIS PROPERTY WAS ANNEXED. COURT RULED THAT SAN RAFAEL's HOUSING ELEMENT SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLIED WITH HOUSING ELEMENT LAW THAT WAS IN EFFECT WHEN SAN RAFAEL ADOPTED ITS HOUSING ELEMENT. CITY WAS AWARDED COSTS OF $26,362.50 FOR EXCESSIVE PUBLIC RECORDS ACT REQUEST BY PLAINTIFFS. COSTS OF DEFENSE WERE SEVERAL HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS (INCLUDED CEQA AND OTHER CLAIMS). LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY CAHLP AND SONOMA COUNTY HOUSING ADVOCACY GROUP IN 2002. MOST OF THE HOUSING BUILT PRIOR TO LITIGATION WAS FOR UPPER INCOME HOUSEHOLDS. LOW AND MODERATE INCOME FAMILIES (70% OF THE POPULATION) SAW ONLY 7% OF THE HOUSING BUILT. COURT ORDERED SANTA ROSA TO REVISE ITS HOUSING ELEMENT FOR IMMEDIATE SUBMISSION TO HCD. UNDER THE TERMS OF THEIR SETTLEMENT, SANTA ROSA COMMITTED TO SIMPLIFYING THE APPROVAL PROCESS, TO SPECIFYING A SITE FOR A 40 + BED HOMELESS SHELTER AND ASSISTING WITH ITS ACQUISITION, TO ESTABLISHING AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING TRUST FUND, ALLOWING SROS, TO COMPLETE REZONING OF LOWER INCOME SITES, AND TO IMPOSING A FEE ON NEW COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT TO SUPPORT DEVELOPMENT OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR THE FACILITIES' WORKERS. CITY ORDERED TO PAY $28,000 IN ATTORNEYS' FEES. 12 1098\01\655305.6 7/28/2014 HARO K CITY OF SOLANA BEACH (2011 195 CAL. APP. 4TH 542. LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVOCATES IN 2008 ON BEHALF OF AN INDIVIDUAL FOR FAILURE TO IMPLEMENT HOUSING ELEMENT. COURT OF APPEAL FOUND CASE TO HAVE BEEN UNTIMELY FILED. CITY OF WINTERS LAWSUIT BROUGHT BY LEGAL SERVICES FOR NOT SETTING ASIDE A SUFFICIENT PERCENTAGE OF UNITS IN NEW DEVELOPMENTS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING. PARTIES SETTLED PURSUANT TO A STIPULATED JUDGMENT. THE CITY MUST REPORT TO PLAINTIFF EACH YEAR, AND PLAINTIFF MAY APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE THE CITY'S HOUSING ELEMENT. 13 1098\01\655305.6 7/28/2014 The McKeown Household 10196 Avocado Place Cupertino, CA 95014 Good Evening Mayor Wong and City Council Members. My family has resided in Cupertino for the last 39 years. I remember that time well because of the traffic congestion at that time as the Highway 85 corridor had not been built. It was absolutely horrible. Finally our savior was the Hon. Norman Mineta. It seems that we are now approaching those same times with no infrastructure to accommodate the alarming rate of population explosion that we are currently experiencing in our city. I believe that there was a set ratio in the general plan for open park space to residents. I would like to ask City Staff if there have been any changes or amendments to this ratio? Perhaps it was the Parks and Recreation Commission that had this equitable ratio. I was fortunate to serve on City Staff as a Senior Recreation Leader and became familiar with this ratio when I worked Special Events with the Parks and Recreation Commission. We are part of a very large voting block that wants to limit further development of dense urban housing. We also want to know who is leasing the fiber optic grid within our city. Respectfully submitted, Jack R McKeown Sr. Jack R. McKeown Jr.