Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Packet 8-14-18CITY OF CUPERTINO AGENDA C U P E RT I N O PLANNING COMMISSION 10350 Torre Avenue, Council Chamber Tuesday, August 14, 2018 6:45 PM AMENDED Amended on August 9, 2018 to remove and replace attachment 3 (Plan Set) of item # 2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Subject: Draft Minutes of July 24, 2018 Recommended Action: Approve or modify the Draft Minutes of July 24, 2018 Draft Minutes of July 24, 2018 POSTPONEMENTS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Commission on any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the Commission from making any decisions with respect to a matter not on the agenda. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS CONSENT CALENDAR Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff or a member of the public, it is requested that items under the Consent Calendar be acted on simultaneously. PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Subject: Architectural and Site Approval Permit to consider allowing facade modifications to an existing commercial building (Target) and site improvements including restriping, and the creation of two public portals along Stevens Creek Page 1 Planning Commission AGENDA August 14, 2018 Blvd. and Saich Way and a Tree Removal Permit to consider allowing the removal and replacement of 43 protected development tree located within the proposed development area. Application No(s).:ASA-2018-01, TR -2018-04; Applicant(s): Jennifer Kirby (Target Corporation); Location: 20745 Stevens Creek Boulevard APN# 326-32-055 Recommended Action: That the Planning Commission adopt the proposed draft resolutions to: 1. Find the project exempt from CEQA 2. Approve the Architectural and Site Approval Permit (ASA -2018-01) 3. Approve the Tree Removal Permit (TR -2018-04) Planning Commission decision final unless appealed Staff Report 1 - Draft Resolution for ASA -2018-01 2 - Draft Resolution for TR -2018-04 3 - Plan Set 4 - Development Narrative 5 - Consultiniz Architect's Comment Letter 6 - Artist Bio and Public Art Design 7 - Parking StudX OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS - "Lei Page 2 Planning Commission AGENDA August 14, 2018 If you challenge the action of the Planning Commission in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Cupertino at, or prior to, the public hearing. In the event an action taken by the Planning Commission is deemed objectionable, the matter may be officially appealed to the City Council in writing within fourteen (14) days of the date of the Commission's decision. Said appeal is filed with the City Clerk (Ordinance 632). In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend the next Planning Commission meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for assistance. Upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, Planning Commission meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative format. Also upon request, in advance, an assistive listening device can be made available for use during the meeting. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission after publication of the packet will be made available for public inspection in the Community Development Department located at City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, during normal business hours and in Planning packet archives linked from the agenda/minutes page on the Cupertino web site. IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code 2.08. 100 written communications sent to the Cupertino City Council, Commissioners or City staff concerning a matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These written communications are accessible to the public through the City's website and kept in packet archives. You are hereby admonished not to include any personal or private information in written communications to the City that you do not wish to make public; doing so shall constitute a waiver of any privacy rights you may have on the information provided to the City. Members of the public are entitled to address the Planning Commission concerning any item that is described in the notice or agenda for this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address the Planning Commission on any issue that is on this agenda, please complete a speaker request card located in front of the Commission, and deliver it to the City Staff prior to discussion of the item. When you are called, proceed to the podium and the Chair will recognize you. If you wish to Page 3 Planning Commission AGENDA August 14, 2018 address the Planning Commission on any other item not on the agenda, you may do so by during the public comment portion of the meeting following the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes or less. For questions on any items in the agenda, or for documents related to any of the items on the agenda, contact the Planning Department at (408) 777 3308 or planning@cupertino.org. Page 4 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 CITY OF CUPERTINO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ACTION MINUTES, July 24,2018 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE At 6:45 p.m Chairperson Paulsen called to order the regular Planning Commission meeting in the Cupertino Community Hall Council Chambers, 10350 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA. and led the Pledge of Allegiance. I rTSI ■ WMA's M I Present: Chairperson Geoff Paulsen, Vice Chairperson Takahashi and Commissioners David Fung, Don Sun, and Jerry Liu. Absent: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Subject: Draft M inutes of M ay 8, 2018. Recommended Action: Approve or modify the Draft Minutes of May 8, 2018 Moved by Liu and seconded by Fung to approve the minutes as written. The motion carried 5-0-0. POSTPONEMENTS/REMOVAL FROM CALENDAR: None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None CONSENT CALENDAR: None PUBLIC HEARINGS: None OLD BUSINESS: None NEW BUSINESS: 2. Subject: Short-term rental regulation options Recommended Action: That the Planning Commission receivethis report and provide its comments for the development of a short-term rental regulation program. Chair Paulsen recused himself from this item. Senior Management Analyst, Katy Nomura and Deputy City Manager, Jacqui Guzman, reviewed the Staff Report and answered questions from the Commissioners Vice Chai r Takahashi opened the publiccomment period and thefollowing individual(s) spoke: Jenifer Griffin Vice Chair Takahashi closed the publiccomment period The Commissioners discussed all of the proposed aspects of the draft program and provided their commentsand suggestionsto Staff. Chair Paulsen returned to the dais. REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: N one REPORT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Chair Paulsen stated that at the Environmental Review Committee meeting, a discussion was held about proposed new parking at McClellan Ranch. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 8:40pm to the next regular Planning Commission meeting on August 14, 2018 at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully Submitted: /s/Beth Ebben Beth Ebben, Deputy Board Clerk CITY OF IM CUPERTINO SUBJECT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION CITY HALL 10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255 TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3308 • FAX: (408) 777-3333 CUPERTINO.ORG PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Meeting: August 14, 2018 Architectural and Ste Approval Permit to consider allowing fagade modificationsto an existing commercial building (Target) and site improvements including restriping, and the creation of two public portals along Stevens Creek Blvd. and Saich Way and a Tree Removal Permit to consider allowing the removal and replacement of 43 protected development tree located within the proposed development area. (Application No(s): ASA -2018-01, TR -2018-04; Applicant(s): Jennifer Kirby (Kimley-Horn); Location: 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd.; APN: 326-32-055) RECOMMENDED ACTIONS That the Planning Commission adopt the proposed draft resolutionsto: 1. Find the project exempt from CEQA (Attachment 1); 2. Approve theArchitectural and S1teApproval Permit (ASA -2018-01) (Attachment 1); 3. Approve the Tree Removal Permit (TR -2018-04) (Attachment 2). DISCUSSION Project Data: General Plan Designation: Commercial/Office/Residential Special Area: Heart of the City Zoning Designation: P (CG, Res) / Planned Development General Commercial and Residential Existing Proposed Property Area: 359,806 s.f. / 8.26 acres No Change Floor Area 0.0: 128,429 s.f. / 2.9 acres No Change Floor Area Ratio: 35.7% No Change Building Height: 21' (top of parapet) 23'-6" (top of parapet at entrances only) Required Proposed Auto Parking: 514 (per Municipal Code) 507 (per parking study) Bicycle Parking: 26 28 Project Consistency with General Plan: Yes Zoning: Yes Environmental Assessment: Categorically Exempt Background: The project is located within the Heart of the City Specific Plan Area within the Crossroads subarea and North Crossroads Node. The Crossroads subarea is intended to be an active, pedestrian -oriented shopping district promoting active retail uses with entries along the street, creating public gathering spaces and plazas, and encouraging outdoor dining along the Stevens Creek Boulevard corridor. The surrounding uses includetheSaich Way Station retail center and a childcarecenter tothewest, Cupertino Crossroads retail center to the south (across Stevens Creek Blvd.), a restaurant and the Marina Plaza retail center to the east, and a multi -family residential neighborhood to the north. A previous development proposal (File #: ASA -2016-07 and TR -2016-38) was approved by the Planning Commission on September 27th, 2016 to allow a remodel of the existing store and parking lot as ,V part of Target's test i program to provide an W,_ improved and 3, 1reimagined customer ``� - • � � shopping experience. A building permit application was submitted in late 2016 but placed on hold in i early 2017. Figure 1 - Existing Land Uses Since then, Target has refined its branding strategies based on other field testing sites and, as part of their National Remodel Program, has changed their scope of work. The project proposal is a remodel of the existing Target store including interior, exterior, and site improvements to enhance the brick -and mortar shopping experiencewith no increasein square footage (See Attachments 3 and 4). Analysis: Architectural Desian and Site Plannin The project implements the new corporate strategy by proposing a sleek contemporary aesthetic, utilizing varied fagade materials, creating public plazas adjacent to the public sidewalks, providing defined and enhanced pedestrian and bicycle connections, and integrating an interactive mural on the western and southern elevations (General Plan Strategies LU -3.3.1 Attractive Design, LU -3.3.6 Architecture and Articulation, and LU -15.1.2 Streetscape.) The project incorporated recommendations from staff and the City's consulting architect (See Attachment 5) and includes the following features: ■ Ensurevisual and physical connectionsfrom publicsidewalk to project ■ Provide bicycle racks and benches at entry plaza and at public portals ■ Provideenhanced paving and landscaping at public portals and walkways ■ Provide additional publicart to enhance pedestrian and bicyclist experience ■ Extend wood board paneling and other landscape elements to soften the existing stucco treatment on the building. The facade modifications will have a strong emphasis on the experience at entrances including the public portals and entry plaza. Currently, the building has a single entrance into the Target store, housed under a portico -like entrance feature designed as a stucco frame with a tiled hipped roof (See Figure 2 inset). With the proposed project, the applicant proposes to remodel the existing entrance, add a new entrance on the western elevation of the building and new order pickup entrances on both the southern and eastern elevations closeto the southeast corner of the building. •�- ,' EXISTING g7l:��T PROPOSED Figure 2 - Existing and Proposed Southern Elevation The facade improvements primarily consist of providing two primary entrances — one facing Stevens Creek Boulevard and the other facing Saich Way (See Figure 2) and the addition of a modern winged wrap-around canopy at the southwest corner of the building to help accentuate the entrance. Thetwo entrieslead to a landscaped and paved entry plaza with outdoor seating at individual tables and chairs and planters with integrated benched seating. The two main entrances and the pick-up entrance (on the eastern elevation) are highlighted with wood siding on the parapet and on the underside of the canopy using Stonewood's architectural paneling (Mambo) and below the canopy drip line using Stonewood'sdarker grain (Cocobala). The canopy cuts across the fagade at an angle running from the entrances on the southwest corner to the southeast corner and to the northwest corner. The project proposesto paint thestucco areasabovethe canopy line beige -white and areas below the canopy line red. The north building elevation (along Alves Drive) is proposed to be enhanced by installing three-dimensional trellis panelswith associated vegetation, to add articulation to the existing stucco wall and soften the side of the building that is facing residential uses (Strategy LU -13.7.5 Neighborhood Buffers). Site Improvements Public Portal The applicant has provided public space (or portals) adjacent to the public sidewalk, which identify areasof connectivity between thebuilding and theright-of way. Providing these public portals furthers the City's General Plan policies LU -2.2. Pedestrian Oriented Public Spaces and LU -5.3 Enhance Connections. These portals are designed as passive rest areas. The portal along Saich Way is about 500 sq. ft. The portal along Stevens Creek Blvd., situated next totheexisting busstop, isabout 1,100sq. ft. These plaza areaswill bepaved with concrete pavers and bounded by drought -tolerant groundcover landscaping. Additional features include: ■ Rectilinear benched seating; ■ A waste trio station; ■ Bicycle parking and a bike repair station; ■ In -ground tree planting area; and ■ Two circular sculptural art benches designed with the same motif as the mural at the entrance of the building (See Public Art section below). Frontage Improvements As a result of the comments from the City's consulting architect and discussions with staff, to further General Plan policies and goals of the Heart of the City related to promoting walkability and accessibility to active retail frontages, each of the sidestreets (excluding Alves Drive) are connected to the building via enhanced walkways utilizing concrete pavers (Strategy LU -13.7.3 Connectivity). Furthermore, the proposed walkways from Saich Way and the existing walkway off Stevens Creek Blvd. will lead to the newly proposed publicportals. The existing street frontage and public -right of way along Stevens Creek Blvd and Saich Way has a monolithic curb. In compliancewith the requirements of the Heart of the City Specific Plan, the applicant is proposing to implement the envisioned Streetscape Concept by separating the sidewalk from the roadway by reversing the location of the sidewalk and landscaping. The applicant proposes to plant trees to create a double row of trees along the sidewalk where currently none exists. These improvements are proposed along theentirelength of Parcel 1 (APN 326-32-055)and Parcel 2(APN 326-32- 056) along Stevens Creek Boulevard and Saich Way. Additionally, areas next to the landscape areas will be enhanced with paving consistent with the design of adjacent parcels. Furthermore, where appropriate, such as at the intersection of Saich Way and Stevens Creek Blvd. pear trees (Pyres calleryana) will be planted in rows on both sides of thesidewalk, consistent with the Heart of the City streetscape design for Central Stevens Creek Boulevard. The Department of Public Works will review and approve the final improvements prior to issuanceof building permits. Landscaping and Trees The project includesthe removal of 43 protected trees. The trees are considered required approved development treesper Section 14.18.050 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. The species proposed to be removed include pear trees, crape myrtles, silk trees, jacarandas, cherry trees, and Japanese maples. The majority of the tree removals are due to the poor health of the trees and/or because the trees are in conflict with the proposed improvements (including the proposed public portals.) The replacement trees comply with the guidelines identified in Municipal Code Section 14.18.160 (See Table 1.) The majority of the on-site trees are in good condition and are located beyond the area of development, within the parking lot, and along the perimeter of the site. In an effort to retain a mature tree canopy on-site, any trees not affected by the proposed development, and in good condition, will be preserved. The proposed replacement species include pear trees, jacarandas, and Western sycamores. Final locations and species of the trees will be reviewed and approved prior to building permit issuance. Additionally, staff recommends an arborist peer review be conducted prior to the issuance of demolition permits, to confirm the condition of retained trees, installation of tree protection measures, and at the end of construction, to verify the number and completion of replacement plantings. PublicArt The applicant partnered with a local Bay Area artist to provide public art as part of the facade improvements (General Plan Policy LU -2.2 Pedestrian -Oriented Public Spaces and LU - 7.1 Public Art.) Michael Bartalos, theartist selected by the Target Creative Team, designed thethree-paneled mural tocaptureand celebrate the natural scenery in and around Cupertino (See Attachment 6) in the piece titled Tree Town. The mural is located at the southwest corner of the building between the two new entrances. The motifs include trees, animals, and Cupertino landmarksthat cumulatively span adistanceof more than 1001inear feet on both thewestern and southern elevations. The ? mural also includes an interactive element in the form of a bench stylized like a tree swing hanging from a Big Leaf Mapletreein the background. Thiselement islocated on thewall facing Stevens Creek Blvd. In addition to themural, thecircular benches proposed at the public portals are designed to reference the imaging and motifs of the mural. The colors used on the seating also complements the colors used on the murals' graphics. Required Size of Diameter of Trunk Proposed Replacement Tree per Removed Size of Removed Tree Replacement Removed Tree Up to 12 inches One 24 -inch box tree 36 36 Two 24 -inch box trees Over 12 inches and up Five 24 -inch and to 36 inches or or 7 five 36-i nch One 36 -inch box tree The proposed replacement species include pear trees, jacarandas, and Western sycamores. Final locations and species of the trees will be reviewed and approved prior to building permit issuance. Additionally, staff recommends an arborist peer review be conducted prior to the issuance of demolition permits, to confirm the condition of retained trees, installation of tree protection measures, and at the end of construction, to verify the number and completion of replacement plantings. PublicArt The applicant partnered with a local Bay Area artist to provide public art as part of the facade improvements (General Plan Policy LU -2.2 Pedestrian -Oriented Public Spaces and LU - 7.1 Public Art.) Michael Bartalos, theartist selected by the Target Creative Team, designed thethree-paneled mural tocaptureand celebrate the natural scenery in and around Cupertino (See Attachment 6) in the piece titled Tree Town. The mural is located at the southwest corner of the building between the two new entrances. The motifs include trees, animals, and Cupertino landmarksthat cumulatively span adistanceof more than 1001inear feet on both thewestern and southern elevations. The ? mural also includes an interactive element in the form of a bench stylized like a tree swing hanging from a Big Leaf Mapletreein the background. Thiselement islocated on thewall facing Stevens Creek Blvd. In addition to themural, thecircular benches proposed at the public portals are designed to reference the imaging and motifs of the mural. The colors used on the seating also complements the colors used on the murals' graphics. Parking Automobile Parking The parking ratio for properties zoned general commercial is 1 parking space per 250 square feet but an alternative standard may be allowed within a Planned Development zone where a parking study can justify a reduced standard. A parking study allows a development the flexibility to evaluate its parking need based on actual demand. A flexible parking standard allows for the promotion of other City and project goals such as improved walkability and bikeability. For example, in thiscase, a reduction in parking standards allows the applicant to replace parking spaces adjacent to the enhanced walkways with the proposed public portals, for improved public spaces and pedestrian and bike access, and create bioretention areas between parking stalls in the northwest parking area, for improved stormwater runoff quality. In 2016 (with the previously proposed project,) Hexagon Transportation Consultants Inc. prepared a parking study to survey the existing parking conditions (See Attachment 7.) The study was conducted on two Saturdays during peak hours in June and the results are su m m ar i zed below: Parking Study Parameters Number of Parking Spaces Spaces occupied — peak hours Percent of excess parking Existing conditions 616 319-367 28-37% 2016 proposal 428 319-367 15-25% Under existing conditions, the study included parking spaces on three parcels on the block on which a recorded shared parking access easement exists. However, under the "2016 proposal" the study only includes the parking stalls on the Target parcel (i.e., the most conservative count). The parking study indicates that only between 319 and 367 spaces were occupied at any time indicating that there is excess parking on site and a reduced parking standard can accommodate the parking needsfor thesite. Furthermore, the restriping at the southwest corner of the parcel results in an additional 10 stalls from the existing condition. Therefore, the proposed 507 parking spaces on the Target site is adequateto accommodate its parking needs. Bicycle Parking The standard for propertieszoned general commercial is bicycleparking space per 5,000 square feet resulting in the requirement of 26 stalls. The applicant proposes a total of 28 parking stalls with 26 short-term bike stalls and two secure long-term bike lockers. The bicycle parking spaces are dispersed around the site: four stalls are proposed at the Saich Way pu bl ic portal; eight are located at the Stevens Creek Blvd publicportal; 14 are located at the southwestern entry plaza; and the two bike lockers are located by the employee entrance on the eastern side. Signage Slgnsarenot approved aspart of thisdevelopment review and will be reviewed at a later d ate. Environmental Assessment: This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15301 Existing Facilities (Class 1) consisting of repair, maintenance, and minor alteration of existing facilities. Other DepartmentlAgency Review: The City's Building Division, Public Works Department, Environmental Services Division, the Santa Clara County Fire Department, and the Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office reviewed the project and have no objections. PUBLIC NOTICING & OUTREACH Thefollowing table isa brief summary of the noticing donefor this project: Public Notice Agenda ■ Site Signage (14 days prior to the hearing) ■ Posted on the City's official notice ■ Legal ad placed in newspaper (at least 10 bulletin board (one week prior to the days prior to the hearing) hearing) ■ 30 public hearing notices mailed to property ■ Posted on the City of Cupertino's owners within 300 feet of the project site (10 website (one week prior to the hearing) days prior to the hearing) No public comments have been received as of the date of production of this staff report (August 7, 2018). PERMIT STREAMLINING ACT This project is subject to the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Section 65920- 65964). The City has complied with the deadlines found in the Permit Streamlining Act. Project Received: February 2, 2018; Deemed Incomplete: March 1, 2018 Project Resubmission: M arch 23, 2018; Deemed Incomplete: A pri 1 18, 2018 Project Resubmission: June 22, 2018; Deemed Complete: July 19, 2018 Project Resubmission: August 3, 2018; Deemed Complete: August 7, 2018 Since this project is Categorically Exempt, the City has 60 days (until October 7, 2018) to make a decision on the project. CONCLUSION Staff recommends approval of the project since the project and conditions of approval address all concerns related to the proposed development and all of the findings for approval of the proposed project, consistent with Chapter 19.168 and 14.18 of the Cupertino Municipal Code, may be made. NEXT STEPS Should the project be approved, the Planning Commission's decision on this project is final unless an appeal is filed within 14 calendar days of the date of the mailing of the decision, on August 28, 2018. The applicant may apply for building and other permits at theend of theappeal period to allow for theconstruction of the proposed improvements. This approval expires on August 14, 2020, at which time the applicant may apply for a one-year extension. Prepared by: Ellen Yau, Associate Planner Reviewed by: Piu Ghosh, Principal Planner Approved by: Benjamin Fu, Assistant Director of Community Development ATTACHMENTS: 1 — Draft Resolution for ASA -2018-01 2—Draft Resolution for TR -2018-04 3 — PI an Set 4—Development Narrative 5 — Consulting Architect's Comment Letter 6—Artist Bio and Public Art Design 7—Parking Study ASA -2018-01 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 DRAFT RESOLUTION OFTHEPLANNING COMMISSION OFTHE CITY OF CUPERTINO A PPROV I N G A N ARCHITECTURAL AND SI TE A PPROVA L PERM I T TO ALLOW FOR FAQADE MODIFICATIONSTO AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING (TARGET)AND SITE IMPROVEMENTSINCLUDING RESTRIPING, AND THE CREATION OF TWO PUBLIC PORTALSALONG STEVEN SCREEK BLVD. AND SAICH WAY, LOCATED AT 20745 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. (A PN 326-32-005) SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: ASA -2018-01 Applicant: Jennifer Kirby (Kimley-Horn) Location: 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd. SECTION 11: FIN DIN GSFORARCHITECTURALAND SITE APPROVAL PERMIT: WH EREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an Architectural and Site Approval to consider allowing fagade modifications to an existing commercial building and to consider site improvements including restriping, and thecreation of two public portals as described in Section I. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinanceof the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one publichearing in regard to theapplication; and WHEREAS, the project is determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application: 1. The proposed development, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injuriousto property or improvementsin thevicinity, and will not bedetrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; Draft Resolution ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 2 The proposal is a remodel of the existing retail building with no increase to the square footage. The remodel includes a new shade canopy at the existing entrance, the addition of a new entrance on the west elevation, an enhanced online pick up entrance on the south elevation toward the eastern edge of the building and a secondary online order pick up entrance on the east elevation, two new public plazas along Saich Way and Stevens Creek Blvd., new wall treatments and the integration of a mural on the existing building facade, restriping of parking stalls, and new landscaping and trees around the site. The elements of the proposal contributes to the overall improvement of public health, safey, general welfare, and convenience by providing public amenities. Therefore, the proposal will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of Chapter 19.168, the General Plan any specific plan, zoning ordinances, applicable planned development permit, conditional use permits, variances, subdivision maps or other entitlements to use which regulate the subject property including, but not limited to, adherence to the following specific criteria: a) Abrupt changes in building scale should beavoided. A gradual transition related to height and bulk should beachieved between new and existing buildings. Excepting where the proposed wood paneling highlights the entrances as focal points, the proposal does not change the overall building bulk and maintains the existing massing and scale. The wood paneling better distinguishes the entry points and the additional 2'-6" height serves as a counter balance to the other proposed elements. The proposed increase in height at these areas is consistent with the zoning and the General Plan. The proposal improves and mitigates the existing massing of the building by utilizing different materials that define and divide the wall planes. b) In order to preserve design harmony between new and existing building and in order to preserve and enhance property values, the materials, textures and colors of new building should harmonizewith adjacent development by being consistent or compatible with design and color schemes with the future character of the neighborhoods and purposes of thezone in which they are situated. The location, height and materials of walls, fencing, hedges and screen planting should harmonize with adjacent development. Unsightly storage areas, utility installations and unsightly elements of parking lots should be concealed. The planting of ground cover or varioustypesof pavementsshould beused to prevent dust and erosion, and theunnecessary destruction of existing healthy treesshould be avoided. Lighting for development should be adequate to meet safety requirements as specified by the engineering and building departments, and provide shielding to prevent spill-over light to adjoining property owners. Draft Resolution ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 3 The building's mass and bulk remains unchanged and the proposed canopy and facade treatments utilizes materials that are consistent with a contemporary aesthetic. The proposal includes upgrading existing stucco walls with wood paneling, green screens, murals and materials that are compatiable with adjacent development. The location of utility and storage areas remain unchanged and located at the rear of the building. The proposal also includes planting of ground cover and trees along the building, between parking stalls where there are no existing trees, and enhanced paving is proposed at pedestrian walkways. Furthermore, existing trees in the parking lot and landscape areas are preserved to keep the mature canopies that exists on-site. Final lighting for the development will be reviewed with the construction documents to meet safety requirements while preventing spill-over light to adjacent properties. c) The number, location, color, size, height, lighting and landscaping of outdoor advertising signs and structures have been designed to minimize traffic hazard, positively affect the general appearance of the neighborhood and harmonize with adjacent development. Signage approval is not included in this application d) With respect to new projects within existing residential neighborhoods, new development should bedesigned to protect residentsfrom noise, traffic, light and visually intrusive effects by use of buffering, setbacks, landscaping, walls and other appropriate design measures. As part of the proposal the pedestrian experience along Saich Way and Stevens Creek Blvd will be improved by detaching the sidewalk from the curb and buffering the sidewalk with a landscape park strip. Additionally, the building abuts a multi family residential neighborhood and the proposal includes the installation of green screens to visually buffer and improve the rear of the building. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of the maps, facts, exhibits, testimony, staff's report and presentation, and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE 4 thereof,: The application for a Architectural and Site Approval, Application no. ASA -2018-01 is hereby approved and that the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. ASA -2018-01 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of August 14, 2018and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. Draft Resolution ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 4 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval isbased on theplan set drawn by Kimley-Horn entitled "Target Cupertino Store Remodel" consisting of twenty-five(25) sheets labeled asT1.1, C0.0, C0.1, C0.2, C1.0, C2.0, L1.0, L1.1, 1-1.2, L1.3, 1-1.4, L 2.0, L2.1, L2.2, L3.0, L3.1, L3.2, A201, LP -103, and four renderings except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. ACCURACY OF PRO,ECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 3. ANNOTATION OF THE CON DITIONSOFAPPROVAL The conditions of approval set forth shall be incorporated into and annotated on the first page of the building plans. 4. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file nos. TR -2018-04 shall beapplicabletothis approval. 5. EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALSITREATMENTS The final building exterior plan shall closely resemble the details shown on the original approved plans. Final building exterior treatment plan (including but not limited to details on exterior color, materials, architectural treatments, doors, windows, lighting fixtures, and/or embellishments) shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permitsto ensure quality and consistency. Any exterior changes determined to be substantial by the Director of Community Development shall either requirea modification to this permit or a new permit based on the extent of the change. 6. WINDOW DETAILS The frontage windows shall be kept open and transparent to the greatest extent possible. The final storefront design and window display shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits for tenant improvements. No changes shall be made to the transparency of the windows without the express approval of the Director of Community Development. Draft Resolution ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 5 7. PROJECT A M EN D M EN TS The Planning Commission shall review amendments tothe project considered major by the Director of Community Development. 8. LANDSCAPE PRO.ECT SU BM I TTA L Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a full Landscape Documentation Package, per sections 14.15.050 A, B, C, and D of the Landscape Ordinance, for projects with landscape area 500 square feet or more or elect to submit a Prescriptive Compliance Application per sections 14.15.040A, B, and C for projects with landscape area between 500 square feet and 2,500 square feet. The Landscape Documentation Packageor Prescriptive Compliance Application shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits, and additional requirements per sections 14.15.040 D, E, F, and G or 14.15.050 E, F, G, H, and I will be required to be reviewed and approved prior to final inspections. 9. LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION REPORT The project is subject to all provisions delineated in the Landscape Ordinance (CMC, Chapter 14.15). A landscape installation audit shall be conducted by a certified landscape professional after the landscaping and irrigation system have been installed. The findings of the assessment shall be consolidated into a landscape installation report. The landscape installation report shall include, but is not limited to: inspection to confirm that the landscaping and irrigation system are installed as specified in the landscape and irrigation design plan, system tune-up, system test with distribution uniformity, reporting overspray or run-off that causesoverland flow, and preparation of an irrigation schedule. The landscape installation report shall include the following statement: "The landscapeand irrigation system have been installed as specified in the landscape and irrigation design plan and complieswith thecriteriaof theordinanceand thepermit." 10. LANDSCAPEAND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE Per the Landscape Ordinance (CMC, Chapter 14.15), a maintenance schedule shall be established and submitted to the Director of Community Development or his/her designee, either with the landscape application package, with the landscape installation report, or anytime before the landscape installation report issubmitted. a) Schedulesshould take into account water requirementsfor theplant establishment period and water requirementsfor established landscapes. Draft Resolution ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 6 b) Maintenance shall include, but not be limited to the fol lowing: routine inspection; pressure testing, adjustment and repair of the irrigation system; aerating and de - thatching turf areas; replenishing mulch; fertilizing; pruning; replanting of failed plants; weeding; pest control; and removing obstructionsto emission devices. c) Failed plantsshall bereplaced with thesameor functionally equivalent plantsthat may besize-adjusted as appropriate for thestageof growth of theoverall installation. Failing plants shall either be replaced or be revived through appropriate adjustments in water, nutrients, pest control or other factors as recommended by a landscaping professional. 11. SCREEN I N G All mechanical and other equipment on the building or on the site shall be screened so they are not visiblefrom public street areas or adjoining developments. Screening materials/colors shall match building features and materials. The height of the screening shall be taller than the height of the mechanical equipment that it is designed to screen. The location of equipment and necessary screening shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 12. TRA N SFO RM ERS Electrical transformers, telephone cabinets and similar equipment shall be placed in underground vaults. The developer must receive written approval from both the Public Works Department and the Community Development Department prior to installation of any above ground equipment. Should above ground equipment be permitted by the City, equipment and enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas, as determined by the Community Development Department. Transformers shall not be located in thefront or sidebuilding setback area. Signage is not approved with this use permit application. Signage shall conform to the City Sign Code. 13. LIGHTING On-site lighting must be in conformance with Cupertino Municipal Code Chapter 19.60 and 19.124 and automatic teller machine lighting, specifically, shall meet minimum standards required by the State of California Business and Professions Cod e. 14. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible, in accordance with the City's Recycling and Diversion of Construction and Demolition Waste under Chapter 16.72 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. The Draft Resolution ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 7 applicant shall provide evidencethat materialswere recycled priorto issuanceof final demolition permits. 15. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. 16. INDEMNIFICATION Except as otherwise prohibited by law, the applicant shall indemnify and hold harmlessthe City, its City Council, and itsofficers, employeesand agents (collectively, the " indemnified parties")from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against one or more of the indemnified parties or one or more of the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void this Resolution or any permit or approval authorized hereby for the project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City itsactual attorneys' feesand costsincurred in defense of the litigation. Theapplicant shall pay such attorneys' feesand costswithin 30 days following receipt of invoices from City. Such attorneys' fees and costs shall include amounts paid to counsel not otherwise employed as City staff and shall include City Attorney time and overhead costs and other City staff overhead costs and any costs directly related to the litigation reasonably incurred by City. 17. NOTICEOFFEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS, OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. SECTION IV: CONDITIONSADMINSTERED BY THE BUILDING DIVISION 18. LOADING ZONE The appl i cant shal I ensure that the proposed drive -up area must be marked as loading zone only on the construction plans. Draft Resolution ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 8 SECTION IV: CON D I TI ON SA D M I N STERED BY TH E PU BL I C WORKS D EPA RTM EN T 19. BUSSTOP LOCATIONS The Developer shall coordinate with Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) on proposed and existing busstop and shelter locationson Stevens Creek Blvd and Saich Way, and any temporary locations needed for construction. Provide a letter of consent from VTA regarding the proposed bus stop improvements and/or any temporary bus stop locations or service interruptions. 20. STREET IMPROVEMENTS& DEDICATION Provide street frontage improvements and dedications along the project to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. All land containing portions of public sidewalk shall be dedicated in fee to the City. Provide a typical 0,5 -foot offset from back of sidewalk for the right-of-way dedication along Stevens Creek Blvd, Saich Way, and Alves Drive. Sidewalk along Stevens Creek Blvd and Saich Way shall be replaced in accordancewith the Heart of the City guidelines. Street improvements may include, but not be limited to, new detached sidewalk, new ADA ramp, driveways, storm drain lateral, street tree installations, and street light and/or pedestrian push button relocation. 21. CU RB AND GU TTER I M PROV EM EN TS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with gradesand standards as specified by the Director of PublicWorks. Thetransition from monolithic to detached sidewalk shall be constructed per City Standard Detail 1-28. The southernmost driveway on Saich Way shall be narrowed to a width that is satisfactory to the Director of Public Works. 22. PED ESTRI A N A N D BI CYCL E I M PROV EM EN TS Developer shall provide pedestrian and bicycle related improvements (e.g. walkway and bicycle racks, etc.) consistent with the Cupertino Bi cycl e Tran sportat i on Plan and the Pedestrian Transportation Plan, and asapproved by the Di rector of PublicWorks. This will include a contribution of $75,000 towards the future Stevens Creek Blvd Class IV Separated Bike Lanes. 23. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the Director of Public Works in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. Draft Resolution ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 9 24. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. If the project increases the existing impervious area, hydrology and pre- and post - development hydraulic calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be constructed or renovated. The storm drain system may include, but isnot limited to, su bsu rface storage of peak stormwater flows (as needed), improvements to impacted portions of the downstream City owned storm drain system, bioretention basins, Low Impact Development treatment facilities, vegetated areas, and hydrodynamic separators to reduce the amount of runoff from the site and improve water quality. The storm drain system shall be designed to detain water on-site (e.g., via buried pipes, retention systems or other approved systems and improvements) as necessary to avoid an increase of the ten percent flood water surface elevation to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Any storm water overflowsor surfacesheeting should bedirected away from neighboring private properties and to the public right of way as much as reasonably possible. Any proposed connectionsto the City storm drain systemsshall bedesigned to connect at manholes. All storm drain inletsshall be clearly marked with the words" No Dumping — Flows to Creek" using permanently affixed metal medallionsor equivalent, asapproved by the Environmental Programs Division. 25. C.3 REQU I REM EN TS C.3 regulated improvements are required for all projects creating and/or replacing 10,000S.F. or moreof impervioussurface(collectively over the entire project site). The developer shall reserve a minimum of 4% of developable surface area for the placement of low impact development measures, for storm water treatment, unless an alternative storm water treatment plan, that satisfies C.3 requirements, isapproved by the Director of Public Works. Treesand plantswithin thetreatment measuresshall be consistent with the Plant List in the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program C.3 Stormwater Handbook, Appendix D. The developer must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs), which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BM Ps are each required. Draft Resolution ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 10 All storm water management plans are required to obtain certification from a City approved third party reviewer. 26. ENCROACH MEN T PERMIT. FEESAN D BONDS The project developer shall obtain an encroachment permit prior to any work to commencewithin the public right-of-way and shall pay feesand bonds, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication feesand fees for under grounding of utilities. Said fees shall be paid prior to issuance of construction permits. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: b. Grading Permit: c. Storm Drainage Fee: d. Encroachment Permit Fee: e. Storm Management Plan Fee Per current fee schedule ($823.70) Per current fee schedule ($2,825 or 6% of improvement costs) Per current fee schedule ($4,550 per AC) Per current fee schedule ($2,436.63 or 5% of improvement costs) Per current fee schedule ($1,208) Bonds: Encroachment Bond: 100% of Off-site Improvements On-site Grading Bond: 100% of Site improvements The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee sch ed u I e. 27. OPERATIONS& MAINTENANCEAGREEMENT Developer shall enter into an Operations & Maintenance Agreement with the City priortofinal occupancy. TheAgreement shall includethe operation and maintenance for non-standard appurtenancesin thepublicroad right-of-way that may include, but isnot limited to, sidewalk, pavers, and street lights. 28. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BM Ps), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. Draft Resolution ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 11 29. N PDESCONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT When and where it is required by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the developer must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the SWRCB, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMPinspection and maintenance. 30. EROSION CONTROL PLAN Developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materialson site. Erosion control notesshall bestated on the plans. 31. WORK SCHEDULE Every 6 months, the developer shall submit a work schedule to the City to show the timetablefor all grading/erosion control work in conjunction with this project. 32. TRA FFI C CON TROL PLA N The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved by the City. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles used during construction. All traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work. The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (M UTCD) standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City. 33. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125. 34. DEDICATION OF UNDERGROUND WATER RI GH TS Developer shall "quit claim" to the City all rights to pump, take or otherw i se extract water from the underground basin or any underground strata in the Santa Clara Valley. Draft Resolution ASA -2018-01 August 14, 2018 Page 12 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of August, 2018, at the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: N OES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Benjamin Fu Assist. Dir. of Community Development APPROVED: Geoff Pau I sen Chair, Planning Commission TR -2018-04 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 DRAFT RESOLUTION OFTHEPLANNING COMMISSION OFTHE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT TO ALLOW FORTH E REMOVAL AND THE REPLACEMENT OF 43 PROTECTED DEVELOPMENT TREES, LOCATED AT 20745 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. (APN 326-32-005) SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TR -2018-04 Applicant: Jennifer Kirby (Kimley-Horn) Location: 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd. SECTION 11: FIN DIN GS FOR TREE REMOVAL PERMIT: WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Tree Removal Permit to consider allowing the removal and replacement of 43 Protected Trees, asdescribed in Section 1. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinanceof the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one publichearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, the project is determined to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to this application: 1. That the location of the trees restricts the economic enjoyment of the property by severely limiting the use of property in a manner not typically experienced by owners of similarly zoned and situated property, and the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the approval authority that there are no reasonable alternatives to preserve the tree(s). The proposal is an update of an existing commercial retail building with no increase of the square footage. In order to accommodate for the new pedestrian -oriented entry plaza located Draft Resolution TR -2018-04 August 14, 2018 Page 2 under the new winged canopy, walkways to public portal plazas, bioretention basins between parking spaces, and the subsequent restriping the existing trees cannot be prereserved in their location. The applicant proposes replacement trees throughout the site in conformance with the Municipal Code Ordinance requirements and proposes to locate the replacements where tree coverage is needed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of the maps, facts, exhibits, testimony, staff's report and presentation, and other evidence submitted in thismatter, subject to the conditions which areenumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE2thereof,: Theapplication for aTreeRemoval Permit, Application no. TR -2018-04 is hereby approved and that the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. TR-2018-04asset forth in the Minutesof Planning Commission Meeting of August 14, 2018 and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on the plan set drawn by Kimley-Horn entitled "Target Cupertino Store Remodel" consisting of twenty-five (25) sheets labeled as T1.1, C0.0, C0.1, C0.2, C1.0, C2.0, L1.0, L1.1, L1.2, L1.3, L1.4, L2.0, L2.1, L2.2, L3.0, L3.1, L3.2, A201, LP -103, and four renderings except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. ACCURACY OF PRO,ECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 3. ANNOTATION OF THE CONDITION SOF APPROVAL The conditions of approval set forth shall be incorporated into and annotated on the first page of the building plans. 4. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file no. ASA -2018-01 shall be applicable to this approval. Draft Resolution TR -2018-04 August 14, 2018 Page 3 2. TREE REPLACEMENT SIZE The applicant shall provide adequate tree replacements for trees proposed to be removed in conformance to the replacement guidelines per Cupertino Municipal Code Section 14.18.160. The size of the proposed replacement trees shal I be modified as follows to be consistent with the City's Protected Tree Ordinance unless deemed infeasible by the City's Consulting Arborist: a. Diameter of trunk size of removed tree up to 12 inches shall be replaced with one 24 -inch box tree; b. Over 12 inches and up to 36inchesshall be replaced by two 24 -inch box tree or one 36 -inch box tree; and c. Over 36 inches shall be replaced with one 36 -inch box tree. If it is determined that it is physically not feasible to plant the required replacements trees, the Applicant may pay in -lieu fees determined to be appropriate by the Community Development Director. 3. ARBORIST REVIEW Prior to building permit issuance, the number, location and species of trees shall be reviewed and approved by the City in consultation with the City's Consulting Arborist. The replacement trees shall be planted prior to building permit final. The Applicant shall providethe Department of Community Development adequate documentation, including, but not limited to, photographs, receipts or invoices, to verify that replacements have been planted. The City's consulting arborist shall inspect thetrees after planting and a report ascertaining thegood health of thetrees mentioned above shall be provided prior to issuance of final occupancy. 4. TREE PROTECTION As part of the demolition or building permit drawings, a tree protection plan shall be prepared by a certified arborist for thetreesto beretained. In addition, thefollowing measures shall be added to the protection plan: • For trees to be retained, chain link fencing and other root protection shall be installed around thedriplineof thetree prior to any project sitework. • No parking or vehicle traffic shall be allowed under root zones, unless using buffers approved by the Project Arborist. • No trenching within the critical root zone area is allowed. If trenching is needed in thevicinity of treesto beretained, the City's consulting arborist shall be consulted before any trenching or root cutting beneath the dripline of the tree. Draft Resolution TR -2018-04 August 14, 2018 Page 4 • Wood chip mulch shall be evenly spread inside the tree projection fence to a four -inch depth. • Tree protection conditions shal I be posted on the tree protection barriers. • Retained treesshall bewatered to maintain them in good health. • A covenant on the property shall be recorded that identifies all the protected trees, prior to final occupancy. The tree protection measuresshall beinspected and approved by thecertified arborist prior to issuance of building permits. The City's consulting arborist shall inspect the treesto beretained and shall provide reviews prior to issuanceof demolition, grading or building permits. A report ascertaining the good health of the trees mentioned aboveshall be provided prior to issuanceof final occupancy. 5. PROTECTED TREES The applicant understands that the replacement trees may not be removed without a Tree Removal Permit and that they shall be responsible for ensuring the proper maintenance and care of the trees. The applicant shall also disclose the location and species of all replacements trees on site upon sale of the property. 5. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. 6. INDEMNIFICATION Except as otherwise prohibited by law, the applicant shall indemnify and hold harmlessthe City, its City Council, and itsofficers, employeesand agents (collectively, the " indemnified parties")from and against any claim, action, or proceeding brought by a third party against one or more of the indemnified parties or one or more of the indemnified parties and the applicant to attack, set aside, or void this Resolution or any permit or approval authorized hereby for the project, including (without limitation) reimbursing the City itsactual attorneys' feesand costsincurred in defense of the litigation. Theapplicant shall pay such attorneys' feesand costswithin 30 days following receipt of invoices from City. Such attorneys' fees and costs shall include amounts paid to counsel not otherwise employed as City staff and shall include City Attorney time and overhead costs and other City staff overhead costs and any costs directly related to the litigation reasonably incurred by City. Draft Resolution TR -2018-04 August 14, 2018 Page 5 7. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS, OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of August, 2018, at the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the fol lowing roll call vote: AYES: COMM ISSI ON ERS: N OES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Benjamin Fu Assist. Dir. of Community Development APPROVED: Geoff Pau I sen Chair, Planning Commission I s TARGET CUPERTINO STORE REMODEL i G5, SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE T1.1 TITLE SHEET .. albertd avr One C0.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C0.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1.0 SITE PLAN C2.0 ci +�v pr L1.1 ARBORIST REPORT 9rQ7 kdaf ARBORIST REPORT L1.3 TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN Helena Dr w rp. Inve%nV«.W.4 L2.1 SiRO1A7J£1 L2.2 ycF L3.0 BIKE CIRCULATION PLAN L3.1 � � VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN A201 N�JGffBOgS J SITE LIGHTING ' homestead Homestead Rd Hor knza30 e d GS,Ia 7I Lunll .4•;e ... 4 4 ivy 475 1£' ., ... v a t0 IQ ?rJnerido,i� � t 4 �p G� = 'a LU0 J U m� .. Yo O LL] Z VU zzz W w� w U 0 N Project Number T-0323 Proto: o Config: Designed By J. Kirby Checked By M. Johnson �C T1 01 n 6 � Ternsen r - - � ?a Ico Pi•:: -• Morita Vist.D vcns Creek Blvd • J 5tevers Creek, Blvd 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd, _P _ ae Cupertino, CA 95014 = i $�►��f ^� t :'4,` a m ri �.,! F 10 ! !Irr w.d y Phil Ln m -. MrClellan o - u Rancho "Mot, - _ a I l Rincorlada i x ry l t 4lo4linTer Rd. CW coq TOLr52 )OAC WN �' Vrs [z s7, O: 7,iiLCFA Porgy - ZVp18R+7CM1' _ L � s 4 PROJECT CONTACTS OWNER TARGET CORPORATION 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 CONTACTS AGENCY CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 TORRE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 TEL: 408.777.3200 BUILDING DEPARTMENT 10300 TORRE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 TEL: 408.777.3228 BUILDING@CUPERTINO.ORG VICINITY MAP SCALE: N.T.S. ARCHITECT ENGINEERING (CIVIL) & LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WD PARTNERS KIMLEY-HORN 7007 DISCOVERY BLVD 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO ST. SUITE 250 DUBLIN, OHIO 43017 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 TEL: 614.634.7000 TEL: 669.800.4130 CONTACT: DAVID BIRNBAUM CONTACT: MILES JOHNSON PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10300 TORRE AVENUE CUPERTINO, CA 95014 TEL: 408.777.3208 PLAN NING@CUPERTINO.ORG SCOPE OF WORK SITE WORK SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATIVE HEADQUARTERS 14700 WINCHESTER BOULEVARD LOS GATOS, CA 95032 PHONE: (408) 378-4010 INFO@SCCFD.ORG • BUILDING FRONTAGE SIDEWALK PAVING & LANDSCAPE PLANTERS • ENHANCED SIDEWALK PAVING ALONG STEVENS CREEK AND SAICH WAY • MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING BUS SHELTER • PARKING LOT PAVING WILL BE CLEANED AND RE -STRIPED • NEW EV PARKING STALLS • DRIVE -UP LANE ALONGSIDE BUILDING • EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN ALONG STEVENS CREEK WILL BE REFACED WITH TARGET'S LATEST BRAND DESIGN. FAQADE MODIFICATIONS • ALL THE ENTRIES WILL BE CHARACTERIZED BY WOOD LIKE FINISHES AND INCREASED GLAZING FOR VISIBILITY INTO THE STORE. • NEW BULLSEYE SIGNS WILL BE LOCATED ON 3 FACADES AT THE BUILDING ENTRY POINTS • IN FRONT OF THE WEST ENTRY THERE WILL BE A LANDSCAPED PLAZA THAT WILL HAVE SEATING FOR STARBUCKS PATRONS AND GUESTS TO RELAX AND PROVIDE A BREAK FROM SHOPPING. • A NEW ORDER PICK-UP ENTRY ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING FOR GUESTS. SHEET LIST TABLE SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE T1.1 TITLE SHEET C0.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS C0.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C0.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1.0 SITE PLAN C2.0 PRELIMINARY SWCP, GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN L1.0 ARBORIST REPORT L1.1 ARBORIST REPORT L1.2 ARBORIST REPORT L1.3 TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN L1.4 TREE MANAGEMENT NOTES & DETAILS L2.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.2 LANDSCAPE NOTES L3.0 BIKE CIRCULATION PLAN L3.1 PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PLAN L3.2 VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN A201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS LP -103 SITE LIGHTING 11 0 ) TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley)))Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 1/03/18 Entitlements Submittal 1 3/23/18 Entitlements Submittal 2 6/20/18 Entitlements Submittal 3 �p G� LU0 J U m� .. Yo O LL] Z VU zzz W w� w U 0 N Project Number T-0323 Proto: Version: Config: Designed By J. Kirby Checked By M. Johnson TITLE SHEET T1 01 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE LEGEND EXCEPTION TABLE 80 LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOTES PROPERTY LINE GARDENA 1. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2015-2016, a lien not DRIVE The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the City of Cupertino, County of 1. All distances shown hereon are in feet and decimals thereof. 3/23/18 GREANLEAF 6/20/18 Santa Clara, State of California, and is described as follows: Entitlements Submittal 3 ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE DRIVE OF Z o o m Z > PARCEL ONE: Insurance, prepared by First American Title Insurance Company, dated May 4, O 2. The lien of special tax assessed pursuant to Chapter 2.5 commencing with Section F FP RUMFORD DR m EASEMENT - Z 53311 of the California Government Code for Community Facilities District No. deed of trust made in good faith and for value, but deleting any covenant, condition or PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE matters of record not stated in said Commitment for Title Insurance that may Z 2005-01, as disclosed by Notice of Special Tax Lien recorded June 24, 2005 as 85 ALVES DR affect the boundary lines, exceptions, or easements affecting the property. BUILDING LINE Instrument No. 18438576 of Official Records. religion, sex, handicap, familial status, national origin, sexual orientation, marital 1990 IN BOOK 613, OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 7 AND 8. ............................................ BUILDING OVERHANG(NOT PARCEL A SURVEY MATTER) status, ancestry, source of income or disability, to the extent such covenants, TWO STEVENS CREEK BLVD PARCEL FOUR conditions or restrictions violate Title 42, Section 3604(c), of the United States Codes k PARCEL ONE FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED ® 2a. The lien of special tax assessed pursuant to Chapter 2.5 commencing with or Section 12955 of the California Government Code. Lawful restrictions under state Nor�h exception of underground utility lines. The locations of these underground utility FOUND IRON PIPE OR AS NOTED O Section 53311 of the California Government Code for Community Facilities District No. and federal law on the age of occupants in senior housing or housing for older persons VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE LEGEND EXCEPTION TABLE LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOTES PROPERTY LINE No. 1. General and special taxes and assessments for the fiscal year 2015-2016, a lien not The Following Matters Affect Parcel Four: The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the City of Cupertino, County of 1. All distances shown hereon are in feet and decimals thereof. 3/23/18 yet due or payable. 6/20/18 Santa Clara, State of California, and is described as follows: Entitlements Submittal 3 ADJACENT PROPERTY LINE (NOT A SURVEY MATTER) 15. Covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements in the document recorded 2. This survey was prepared from information furnished in a Commitment for Title February 14, 1972 as Book 9702, Page 170 of Official Records, which provide that a PARCEL ONE: Insurance, prepared by First American Title Insurance Company, dated May 4, CENTERLINE 2. The lien of special tax assessed pursuant to Chapter 2.5 commencing with Section violation thereof shall not defeat or render invalid the lien of any first mortgage or 2015, Amended 5-15-15. Order No. NCS -678032 -CC. No liability is assumed for EASEMENT - — — — — — - 53311 of the California Government Code for Community Facilities District No. deed of trust made in good faith and for value, but deleting any covenant, condition or PARCEL 1 AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE matters of record not stated in said Commitment for Title Insurance that may 2005-01, as disclosed by Notice of Special Tax Lien recorded June 24, 2005 as restriction indicating a preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON APRIL 23, affect the boundary lines, exceptions, or easements affecting the property. BUILDING LINE Instrument No. 18438576 of Official Records. religion, sex, handicap, familial status, national origin, sexual orientation, marital 1990 IN BOOK 613, OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 7 AND 8. ............................................ BUILDING OVERHANG(NOT A SURVEY MATTER) status, ancestry, source of income or disability, to the extent such covenants, 3. Physical items shown on this survey are limited to those items visible as of the conditions or restrictions violate Title 42, Section 3604(c), of the United States Codes PARCEL TWO: date of this survey. Subsurface structures, if any, are not shown with the FOUND MONUMENT AS NOTED ® 2a. The lien of special tax assessed pursuant to Chapter 2.5 commencing with or Section 12955 of the California Government Code. Lawful restrictions under state exception of underground utility lines. The locations of these underground utility FOUND IRON PIPE OR AS NOTED 0 Section 53311 of the California Government Code for Community Facilities District No. and federal law on the age of occupants in senior housing or housing for older persons EASEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE ERECTION AND MAINTENANCE ON THE lines have been compiled from available plans, markings and no warranty is 2013-1, as disclosed by Notice of Special Tax Lien recorded January 22, 2014 as shall not be construed as restrictions based on familial status. FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND A SIGN OR SIGNS ADVERTISING THE implied as to the exact location of these lines. Said subsurface objects may BOLLARD LIGHT Instrument No. 22502535 of Official Records. COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES CARRIED ON UPON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND, include, but are not limited to, concrete footings, slabs, shoring, structural piles, LIGHT (NOT A SURVEY MATTER) Document(s) declaring modifications thereof recorded April 04, 1977 as Book C71 3, AS FOLLOWS: utility vaults, piping, underground tanks, and any other subsurface structures not Page 656 of Official Records. revealed by a surface inspection. The underground locating company was not able STREET LIGHT O� O\ O� G 3. The lien of supplemental taxes, to the extent resulting from changes in ownership 0 LU J U m� w Y O OLID w 0) Z U U_ O Z Z Z W >~ D `wW^ W U Lq� r` 0 N BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARK AVENUE, AS SAID LINE WAS to locate the fire service line that services this existing building. Version: Config: or commencement of construction on or after the date of the policy pursuant to the Document(s) declaring modifications thereof recorded May 12, 1977 as Book C821 , ESTABLISHED BY DEED FROM ANTON SAICH ET AL, TO CITY OF CUPERTINO, A Como TRAFFIC SIGNAL POLE `S provisions Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation Page 324 of Official Records. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DATED OCTOBER 26, 1961 RECORDED NOVEMBER 2, 1961 4. A.P.N.: 326-32-055 & 326-32-056 TRANSFORMER Code of the State of California. (NOT PLOTTABLE) IN BOOK 5350 OFFICIAL RECORDS, PAGE 740, SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDS, (NOT A SURVEY MATTER) DISTANT THEREON NORTH 89° 56' 55" EAST 707.59 FEET FROM THE POINT OF 5. Zoning Note: FIRE HYDRANT A 16. This item has been intentionally deleted. INTERSECTION THEREOF WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN 10.51 ACRE This survey makes no evaluation as to compliance with zoning and building codes STORM DRAIN MANHOLE The Following Matters Affect Parcel One: TRACT OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED FROM ANTON SAICH ET AL, TO LUCKY and/or ordinances other than current municipal building setback line locations. 17. Covenants, conditions, restrictions, easements, assessments, liens, charges, terms STORES, INC., A CORPORATION, DATED OCTOBER 27, 1961, RECORDED NOVEMBER 3, MANHOLE O 4. A lease dated May 01, 1962, executed by Lustor Realty, Inc., a Delaware corporation and provisions in the document recorded April 23, 1990 as Book L329, Page 1699 of 1961 IN BOOK 5352 OFFICIAL RECORDS, PAGE 466, SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDS; The subject property is currently zoned "Heart of the City Specific Plan Area"; as lessor and Lucky Stores, Inc., a California corporation as lessee, recorded August 10, Official Records, which provide that a violation thereof shall not defeat or render THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING SOUTH 0` 06' 43" EAST 30.00 FEET; THENCE Planned Development CLEAN OUT o 1962 as Book 5678, Page 544; as amended by that certain Amendment to Lease dated invalid the lien of any first mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value, NORTH 89° 56' 55" EAST 38.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION THEREOF WITH GAS METER ¢a July 29, 1987 and memorialized by that certain Memorandum of Amendment to Lease but deleting any covenant, condition or restriction indicating a preference, limitation THE WESTERLY LINE OF SARATOGA-SUNNYVALE ROAD, AS SAID LINE WAS The current building setbacks for this zoning designation are per the Planned recorded as document 9442228; and as amended by that certain Amendment No. 2 to or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, national ESTABLISHED BY DEED TO SAID CITY OF CUPERTINO ABOVE REFERRED TOTHENCE ; Development permit currently on file with the City of Cupertino Planning UTILITY POLE W/ GUY WIRE Lease dated February 8, 1990, as memorialized by that certain Memorandum of origin, sexual orientation, marital status, ancestry, 9 ry, source of income or disability, to NORTHERLY ALONG AN ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT, FROM A TANGENT BEARING Department. VALVE g Amendment No. 2 and Amendment No. 3 to Lease recorded document 14308512; the extent such covenants, conditions or restrictions violate Title 42, Section 3604(c), 0`06' 48" WEST WITH A RADIUS OF 30.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE as amended by that certain Amendment No. 3 to Lease dated July 14, 1998, as J of the United States Codes. Lawful restrictions under state and federal law on the age OF 89° 56' 1 7"NORTH FOR AN ARC DISTANCE OF 47 , .09 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SAID Information was obtained from the City of Cupertino, Planning Department CATCH BASIN / DROP INLET ®® memorialized by that certain Memorandum of Amendment No. 2 and Amendment No. of occupants in senior housing p g or housing for older persons shall not be construed as SOUTHERLY LINE OF PARK AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 89° 56' 55" WEST ALONG SAID LAST MENTIONED LINE 8.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AS SURVEYED IN JUNE, Website on April 7, 2016. WATER METER ® 3 to Lease recorded as document 1430851 2. amd as amended by that certain restrictions based on familial status. 1962 BY PACIFIC ENGINEERS, CIVIL ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS, PALO ALTO, Amendment No. 4 to Lease dated December 8, 1998, recorded as document 14570649 CALIFORNIA. 6. Basis of Bearings: FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION of Official Records. Document(s) declaring modifications thereof recorded May 28, 2004 as Document No. The bearing of North 0°02'27" East taken on the centerline of Saich Way as shown BACK FLOW PREVENTER 17816208 of Official Records. AS GRANTED BY ANTON SAICH AND JOHN SAICH, MARRIED MEN, TO LUCKY STORES on that certain Parcel Map filed for record on April 23, 1990 in Book 613 of Maps Defects, liens, encumbrances or other matters affecting the leasehold estate, whether (NOT PLOTTABLE) INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION BY INSTRUMENT DATED 7, 1961 RECORDED at Pages 7 & 8, Santa Clara County Records was taken as the Basis of all Bearings POST INDICATOR VALVE O� or not shown by the public records. NOVEMBER 3, 1961 IN BOOK 5352 OFFICIAL RECORDS, PAGE 468. shown hereon. UTILITY BOX (SIZE VARIES) F7 (NOT A SURVEY MATTER) (NOT 18. This item has been intentionally deleted. THREE: 7. Flood Zone Note: BOLLARD (UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED) 5. The effect of the following: Declaration of Restrictions and Agreement to Terminate 19. The terms provisions and easements contained in the document entitled � p () Management The subject property is shown on the Federal Emergency Agency Former Declaration of Restrictions, dated December 1, 1 971 , by John Saich et al, and "Easement Agreement" recorded July 29, 1998 as Document No. 14308513 of Official RIGHTS AND EASEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel Number 060339 0208 H, dated SIGN T Lustor Realty, Inc. recorded February 14, 1972 in Book 9702, Page 170, Official Records. CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND GRANT OF EASEMENTS RECORDED APRIL 23, May 18, 2009, as being located in Flood Zone 'X"; TITLE REPORT EXCEPTION NUMBER O Records. Amendment No. 1 to Declaration of Restrictions dated as of December 30, (EASEMENT PLOTTED HEREON) 1990 AS BOOK L329, PAGE 1699, OFFICIAL RECORDS AND CONSENT AND 1976, by John Saich et al, Sutro/GHL Realty Funds, and Lucky Stores, Inc. recorded AMENDMENT TO DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1 % annual chance flood with average RECORD INFORMATION (100.00) April 4, 1977 in Book C713, Page 656, Official Records. Consent Agreement to 20. An easement for Sidewalk and incidental purposes, recorded September 22, 1998 GRANT OF EASEMENTS RECORDED MAY 28, 2004 AS DOCUMENT NO. 17816208, depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and TREE W/ SIZE AND ELEVATION t0 Declaration of Restrictions dated May 9, 1977, by Norcal Associates, a California as Document No. 14405949 of Official Records. In Favor of: City of Cupertino OFFICIAL RECORDS. areas protected by levees from I% annual chance flood. 100.0 partnership recorded May 12, 1977 in Book C821, Page 324, Official Records (EASEMENT PLOTTED HEREON) CURB - (NOT PLOTTABLE) EXCEPTING FROM PARCEL THREE ANY SUCH RIGHTS AND EASEMENTS LOCATED ON Information was obtained from the FEMA website (www.fema.gov) on 21. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not shown by the public records. PARCEL ONE, ABOVE. April 6, 2016. CURB & GUTTER 6. This item has been intentionally deleted. CONCRETE 22. This item has been intentionally deleted. PARCEL FOUR: 9. There was no observable evidence of earth moving work, building construction or 7. Matters in a document entitled "Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and building additions at the time of the survey. FENCE x x Restrictions and Grant of Easements", executed by and between Stevens 23. This item has been intentionally deleted. PARCEL 2 AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN PARCEL MAP FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT --- Creek/Cupertino Associates, recorded April 23, 1990 as Book L329, Page 1699 of RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON APRIL 23, 10. There are no proposed changes in street right of way lines at the time of the Official Records , including but not limited to covenants, conditions, restrictions, 24. The following matters disclosed by an ALTA/ACSM survey made by DRC 1990 IN BOOK 613, OF MAPS, PAGE(S) 7 AND 8. survey. There was also no observed evidence of recent street or sidewalk SANITARY SEWER ____SS -- easements, assessments, liens and charges. Engineering, Inc. on May 4, 2015, designated Job No. 15-818: construction or repairs. STORM DRAIN SD -- Document(s) declaring modifications thereof recorded May 28, 2004 as Instrument No. Parcel Four: No Survey Matters 12. As of the date of this survey there was no observable evidence of any wetland WATER wareas 17816208 of Official Records. (NOT PLOTTABLE) within the boundaries of the subject property and the surveyor was not 25. Any claim that the Title is subject to a trust or lien created under The Perishable provided with any information or documentation that disclosed that any wetlands GINDERGROUND ELECTRIC 6 8. An easement shown or dedicated on the map of Parcel Map recorded April 23, 1990 Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930 (7 U.S.C. §§499a, et seq.) or the Packers and may exist. It shall be noted that the undersigned Land Surveyor is not qualified to TELEPHONE T and on file in Book 613, Page 7 and 8, of Parcel Maps. For: Public service Easement Stockyards Act (7 U.S.C. §§181 et seq.) or under similar state laws. ABBREVIATIONS make an independent judgment determination as to what does or does not and incidental purposes. constitute a wetlands area. Further review of the California Department of Fish OVERHEAD 0H (EASEMENTS PLOTTED HEREON) and Game website discloses that it does not show any wetlands areas within the LIGHTING CONDUIT // AC ASPHALTIC CONCRETE subject property. 9. This item has been intentionally deleted. ACP ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE FIBER OPTIC CABLE F0 AD AREA DRAIN 13. Benchmark: STANDARD PARKING STALLS �1 10. The Terms, Provisions and Easement(s) contained in the document entitled BL BUILDING Santa Clara Valley Water District BM1 35; Brass Disk is a RESET, located +/- 14 feet "Easement Agreement" recorded July 29, 1998 as Instrument No. 14308513 of Official BW BACK OF WALK behind the Northerly corner of the southwesterly headwall (Stevens Creek ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS (Ea Dp D& Records. CB CATCH BASIN Boulevard and Calabazas Creek), along the western brick edge, 4.5 feet above the CONTOUR "" (EASEMENT PLOTTED HEREON) CLF CHAIN LINK FENCE sidewalk pavement. City of Cupertino. -"- CO CLEAN OUT TO GRADE INDEX CONTOUR2� 0_. _ _ _ COMM COMMUNICATION Elevation: 192.39' (NAVD88 Datum) AERIAL SPOT ELEVATION S � �,-,,.� 11 . An easement for sidewalk and incidental purposes, recorded SEPTEMBER 22, 1998 as Instrument No. 14405949 of Official Records. In Favor of: City of Cupertino CONC CONCRETE DI DROP INLET 14. This map was prepared using computer assisted, photogrammetric methods by FINISH FLOOR MEASURED LOCATION 251.29 FF (CARPET)(CARPET) (EASEMENT PLOTTED HEREON) DOC. DOCUMENT Mira Solutions, Inc., in Union City, California. In areas of dense vegetation, accuracy of contours may deviate from accepted accuracy standards. The date of 12. A deed of trust to secure an original indebtedness of $9,000,000.00 recorded EB ELECTRIC BOX ECAB ELECTRIC CABINET Photography was March 29, 2016 as Job No. K&WSC03-2016_01 8. December 19, 2008 as Instrument No. 20073492 of Official Records. Dated: ESMT EASEMENT December 18, 2008 Trustor: Stevens Creek/Cupertino Associates LLC, a California EV ELECTRIC VAULT limited liability company Trustee: First American Title Insurance Company EW EDGE OF WALK Beneficiary: American United Life Insurance Company FC FACE OF CURB Document re-recorded October 13, 2009 as Instrument No. 20463621 of Official FDC FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION Records. FF FINISH FLOOR (NOT A SURVEY MATTER) FH FIRE HYDRANT FL FLOW LINE PARKING SUMMARY A document entitled "Absolute Assignment of Rents and Leases" recorded December FND FOUND 19, 2008 as Instrument No. 20073493 of Official Records, as additional security for FOB FIBER OPTIC BOX DESCRIPTION PARCEL ONE PARCEL FOUR TOTAL the payment of the indebtedness secured by the deed of trust. FOMH FIBER OPTIC MANHOLE (NOT A SURVEY MATTER) FSA FIRE SPRINKLER ALARM STANDARD PARKING 525 61 586 GEN GENERATOR COMPACT PARKING 0 0 0 13. The following matters disclosed by an ALTA/ACSM survey made by DRC IB IRRIGATION BOX- INV INVERT ELEVATION -- - , --- --- -- ACCESSIBLE PARKING 1 1 0 11 Engineering, Inc. on May 4, 2005, designated Job No. 15-818: LIP LIP OF GUTTER TOTAL 536 61 597 Parcel One: The easement labeled as "B" at the northeast corner of Parcel One MH MANHOLE MON MONUMENT encroaches about 5' into the corner of the building. N NORTH NE NORTHEAST 14. This item has been intentionally deleted. NO. NUMBER NW NORTHWEST O.R. OFFICIAL RECORD PIV POST INDICATOR VALVE PL PROPERTY LINE r SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE (PP) PER PLAN P.S.E. PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT RIM RIM ELEVATION TO: WD PARTNERS, INC. RWL RAIN WATER LEADER AND: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY S SOUTH SDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in SE SOUTHEAST accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land SL STREET LIGHT Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes items 2, SLB STREET LIGHT BOX 3, 4, 5, 6(b), 7(a), 7(b)(1), 7(c), 8, 9, 1 1 , 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, and 19 of Table A thereof. SQ. FT. SQUARE FEET The field work was completed on April 20, 2016. SS SANITARY SEWER SSCO SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT SSMH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SW SOUTHWEST TB TELEPHONE BOX TC TOP OF CURB TMH TELEPHONE MANHOLE LAND SSP TSB TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX �0 R. ��� \��( TW TOP OF WALL TYP. TYPICAL UB UTILITY BOX DATE JIMMY . VIGIL. L.S. 62T6 UCAB UTILITY CABINET jvigil@kienvdght.com 5k 7r UE UTILITY ENCLOSURE rT he W WEST qlF WB WATER BOX OF U�� Z — n n 0�f c Q o 0 UJ c�e1 2 J N (n N V 06 -q- V) to -o IY 0) m' rn ` W ro 5 lLIc Z aw Z 0U Ce LU Z ro o M LU J u X0;3 �^c �C UM V) x Q Z ce O LL J Q U Q J Z O (� m F..{ w LU w Z U � w 0 Lr, L111 7 O Ca H 0 n O N O Z_ H LU LU CL U DATE APRIL, 2016 SCALE NONE DESIGNER JRV DRAFTER CJ JOB Al 6056 SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS USER:cjunokas 1:\PROJECTS\A16056\DWG\SURVEY\ALTA\C-ALTA.dwg APRIL 20, 2016 12:32 PM TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley)))Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 1/03/18 Entitlements Submittal 1 3/23/18 Entitlements Submittal 2 6/20/18 Entitlements Submittal 3 O� O\ O� G 0 LU J U m� w Y O OLID w 0) Z U U_ O Z Z Z W >~ D `wW^ W U Lq� r` 0 N Project Number T-0323 Proto: Version: Config: Designed By J. Kirby Checked By M. Johnson EXISTING CONDITIONS Como 252 .7 :> m _ ] w 3 1 x �I I ; N llJ 253.6 04 in I m z_ ti' � m -� - 253.6 I• x 253. x 253.4 DIRT x 251.3 251.8 x 251.8 x 251.6 x z DIRT Note: The underground locating company was not able to locate the fire service line that services this existing building. 20745 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD ONE STORY BUILDING 35.1'- BUILDING HEIGHT 128,567 ± SQ. FT. (PER EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS) PARCEL ONE PARCEL 1 (613 M 7&8) 8.258 ± ACRES 0-51-1 a * zo a 246.9 c yo'ph `o 2 �ogvN x 45.3 I � �1 x 248.5 c0 x 245.7 ( 253.6 - L. x 248.3 )/ 1 2.3' B 252.3 1 - 246.11 J 1 z 24 7 -125 t 3 ,rn WL CONC GUTTER 1 .O' BL BW N N � / W 169.7' BL _ i s al c x 253.8 - �3� ............�.3�..............................24 _ _ -13' 32 'i x 252.2 "-, „sc 1. e. .. 7E. 251.zt ssco 1. �246502 TCLf ................................. ......... .. .._..... ........ ........ ............ ....... ..... n,.r.�"n.����1 \ DIRT '10� ,,,.f""� a ^ ;I E�� 1 - .0'x251.4 1 .3' 251.21 SSCO SSCO (PP) .t 251. �-'' 0a1T `�/ ¢° _ _ - .. _ ..- - - LANT Rx 4" f� -^ 6.3113 SD .. ... ..... .......... ... ......... " " BW.................... .25132 1. S PLANTER PLANTER PLANTER '' 249.8 . CONCRETE SIDEWALK---- `-i 255 -�' �r'>,,, 251.32 ILO 251.4 242.8 B0 0 GREASE INTERCEPTOR x 251.1 x2512 6 JG�aJ I4t x 251.2 � -zas.t x 252.3 'm24679 4° IN W x 251,2 t - x 25 .1j_CONC TE 7 O W DIRT J``5-- m- - � r 'S O 1.4 245.76 DR ii-. H y 245.84 TO BOTTOM SIGN • - - - - - - 250. [ O 246.3 245.67 FL ` ` N 24 7 DW 1 W I 10.1' FC 293.2 251'4 x ss 250.04 ssco' ss 248.2 _ 3 x 251.6 GREASE INTERCEPTOR 251.35 251.3 SCp FLUSH CURB CONCRETE BALL BOLLARD TYP. x 250.5 3 SEE H E T SEE S H E E 3 I III 242.7 MEN n ( ' x 250.6. x 250.3 'm 4. r U SITE i o >• x 252.6 2 1.E1 - m U x 252.9 AC PAVEMENT x !-- M- AC MATCH LI I x 252.4 25,.2 x 250.8 2 .9 x 250.8 zo I I _ CES'$ - 251.5 AC PAVEMENT x 250.6 SITE 1 AC PAVEMENT x 250.3 iv �, ,.x=. - I 46.1 MATT 250.2 ,,� 8? x 249.5 Ep 248.3 x I� AC PAVEMENT U ACCE$ x 253.3 x 250-? x 250.8 O G 0 1-1 /4 -GAS x 247. I 245.91 TC rn J x 252.7 x 252.4 C17 0.7 x 250.6 x 250.3 AC PAVEMENT x 253,5 x 251.8 x 298.9 x zso.4 z50,ji - _ 248.5 I .� 1 �N „-�.- ° �`> 2 7 -. x 249.7 ,-7 'l N 89°55'27" E 158.1W (156.00) FND -1/2" BRASS I 2`0 9 2 8 50 6 BW MT N 89°55�' E 80.00' x 250.7 28998 �i AC PAVEMENT -- 1 11 ter - • - r. 246.140 L P I x 2 3 s'} h DIRT m , x 251. x 2501.7 RAMP DIRT EB L� W m 246.61GRN 246.05 FL 249.3 , X5.4' y METAL CART REN K (TV.) M ( I -^'�' 2513 x 249.4 Q �`1J� '�, 20 .3 1 W a ® x 250.3 2so. l 11.5 FC F M 1 , 11i 1 j x 253.3 _ N 3� ® G x 250.8 _ 0 /i;l 290.5 �244i x 249.4 Lu j246.5 lll� r - C. x 15Q.2 x 250.2 0 0 \ �- Z - X53.2 ;, .t \41 46. GR I. 253.2 ° ° 770.7 J Z { 7 _ a® ® Cc r - 13.2';B� '- m U � a` � z 7 N a. N 7 z N $9°55'27" E 65.00' 0 I x 250.5O 1, O O, 246.06 LI246.02 P, •, _ 2511 ® I 2 J °V N -� 250.2 1 -L..-1..x' 7a 250.4 b - 1 -2,4 x 250.7 249.2 } x 253.5 x 249.6 249-5 o 5 x 250.5 x .. .... :..• ;... :. l of I 1 3 1 ® i ® 2 3.� 252.7 DI -RIM 248.86 x 254.3 DIRT 6 ,1 Vi R P INV 244.90 12"(OUT-S) s 4� x 249.3 1 1 1 X54. 249.7 250.4 �1 _- v AC PAVEMENT 2.5 I 19.9' FC 20.0' F� 1 '4 BRI x 250.5 50.8 244J a .. ........ .. 4 3 'S 254.7 1 PAVES x 250.2 N DIRT x 254.4 i I ` I z 251.4 t SLB METAL CAR RETURN RACK TYP.) AC PAVEMENT, 2 9 �- x 25� 6 x 249. 11, x 254.4 7'14.6 �` c PARCEL THREE J0 y 25 .s _ OVER PARCEL 3 -253'3 ti x 25o.z zsv.s RIGHTS & EASEMENTS 251.2 _ � I�'�- -)' � � � O 1 I 1 19 �1��� L329 O.R. 1699 �s - 0 254.5 1 `- 251.7 - DI -RIM 248.29 / 13 20 8 15 15 0 19 19 x 250.4 �1 x 249.3 INV 244.93 12"(OUT-SW) 12"SD 1 i 3 DIRT - �- (4W S 250.3 250.8 EXISTING BUILDING 11 o � 12"SD W L x.. 54.6- - x X 252.6 251.6 LYP., - - 250.1 25 r 1 ) ` x J AC PAVEMENT 1 DIRT d r--- 249.6 II x 250.4 I ' 254 2 x 254.5 - 1 DIRT (TYP.) x 250.4 AC PAVEMENT 50.8 r i 253.7 p ,\ = �5�6 III w' x 2517 x 254.6 O 12°50 5 x 25:e.4 x 249.5 f N x 25 .7 '�I 49. N N 250.8 SITE 3 IN 207 5 $TEVEE EK BOULEVAR 253. x 1 W x 254.4 250.8 x �' x 25 .7 I ACCESS r 54.8 W x 254.. 4 .3 X 2 9 24 .2 I R L FOUR 2511 250.6 o r 1UJ N AC PAVEMENT (6113 M 7&8 01 1 - 250-6 k Y DIRT M 1x 254.2 x 254.4 254.9 ry x 2524 i p 3 I ?IJ x 254.5 •820 ± ACRES' x 254.6 _ _ - Z METAL CA RENRN RACK TIP.) x ' S 2 l` �+ n F O 254-9 w I � 2 x 754.6 x 254.9 AC PAVEMENT � J51.5 �- � ,x 249.7 �{j1 �`-'L( � /'►V � i 1 - - x 250.9 IJ �- 1 I flo x 54. tr - O x 2x9.8 O x254.7 METAL E ETURN RA K (TYP.) x 254.7- i� x '� 3-6 2528 '[-223 = TW �. x 251.5 �. x 250.7 -1 1 �'4� 6 26 40 60 �.1h- _A...i 254.3 o 1 ( 251.1 v CJ 1U.$' 'F 11 F O 1 a O Scale 1" = 20 ft �e w L1J x 11 30.00' 30.00'- x f.-. 4 L a9.H f 246. s ' JIa �O1 _o DIRT O O x 254.9 S'✓ 252.8 x x 1 x 24.4' I m x 2548 / x 251. �I 254.3 1 4 x 249.7 Z 3 x 2545 �+ x 2$ 6 DIRT (TYP.) DIRT RAMP DIRT) O DIRT DIRT (TYP.) 249.5 CONCRETE ! x 1.71 x 2E4 _ 254.5 1 0 x 254_8 'J W 28'_4 1 ti _� ti` 1 1 1 O x 251.8 x 251.3 �I x 249. b x 246., 254-g �� T d' x 251.` V AC PAVEMENT x 25.1 1 x 253.3 PAVERS Lyj � BRICK V 250.4 x 255.1 1 x PAVERS 251.7 J n_ � p x 252.3 291-6 a x z5c 7 27.9' FC ❑ x z55. 9.9' FC 254.9 z�7 - w z I - r_y l', 250 _ R-30.00' 6 AC PAVEMENT '\ DIRT 5 n 253 U m = O r-" ,� " W ` "�t,.� cz� 1 I a I� w U / ce DIRT _ r" 'Z FG D-90°6760' � - ® U U Cn � � ��� I � 1 26 0� •2 0.7 ! 25 .1.7 � �____j� Y L=47.1 8' 255.2 ^ o w k dC I 249.: x 249.7 ?as.' O LUC 252. U LL DIRT 6.T FC j �-'t ,-> "DETECTOR" [0 m ' iV _-__ LL LL Mj _. 24973 EW z rn . f oil Q ¢ O UCAB W M J4 O J U v 1 o W N 85°09'38" E 60.21' 0� q c m 246.7 S 85°18 44" E 60.21 2 0.. 289 ' If4.4'SIGN � � 'i •zas.2 '� �'r� x6`Pq�. _ p J - �� _ CPt.,-.� x 2a t.7 �t,r.sS13.4.. _2i.5'l.� _ q - _ - - _ - .__ _ _ - CONCRETE SIDEWALK- - - - - - __ 50:q 24 S i �!t DIRT - BUS STOP ASH AN r - 249.59E N 89°55'27' E a N 89°55'27" E--40.00'250.3- -- x ---------- DI - 1 14.94' 12.0-�..��"""' .CONCRETE • x z $ 89°55'27" W 126.99' CONCRETE a 4 253.9 C3 TSB j _ 4 .4 GRN 1249.21 GRN 249.11 GRN / - - - DRIVEWAY 2 3.9 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY �- 10 70 85 --- ------------ - - 249. BW FO ----- FO ---- --- FO FO - _ 2518 -- FO 250.8 � FO FO FO X FO UB SB TSB COMM CONCRETE SIDEWALK 0 FOB CONCRETE _-- -- CONCRETE SIDEWALK FOMH "DETECTOR" TMH O Dd- 256.4 x 3 _ U 'DETE TOR" x-5.5 LL 6- G G TMH C x 253.6 INV249. 24 251.88 x 251.4 3 G G G N INV 244.19 12'IN-N) G 3" GAS G G G G 3"GAS x 2 6.6 V 244.13 18° OUT -SE) W 256. W W W W LL -- _ WATER W LL N 6"WATER STEVENS CREEK ULEVARD �• W W 6"WATER x 257.4 U x 255.4 u.l w AC PAVEMENT so w W 0 3 J��IN TOH PNCH t= U (A PUBLIC STREET) N U v x 257.8 - 256.6 x 256 1 Tri Q 254.4 x 254.1 - - ' Q 7 250.3 x 249.4 x 24 ,7 MON BOX x 255.1 - - N 89°55'27" E - - - 670.23' (670.07) - - - ! - - - - - - 217.5 Sze ��-- - -- ---- - - - d. o ' F x 255.4 C �✓ -- --- -� �--- \ 27"SD f.. _ X X - 27°SD �, SS DISK -"- x • 76.6 ~` T , x 254.2 o SDMH-RIM c WITH PUNCH IAN MON BOX -_-. � �. � x 251.7 - zs7.6 0 "CITY OF CUPERTINO" «- INV 246.78 15 257.9 INV 244.02 18" (IN -NW; tri AC PAVEMENT j INV 243.65 27" (IN -W')) x 248.5 x 24 x 257.4 1 U x �z-5s� 752.7 - t INV 243.63 27" OUT -E X 249c4 x--248.6 SSMH=RIM 255.61 LL x 255-4 25-„ - V 246.91 8 IN -W x 251.5 x 251.1 x 250.5 INV 246.89 8" IN -S) c`'T 18"WATER 18"WATER 257.6 x 257.5 x 256.5 INV 246.86 8"(0UT-E) --- __ - ___ _ ___ ___ ___ ___ _ _ __ . 255.5 SSM A4.24 - SSMH-RIM 246.90 INV 246.27 8 (IN -W) x 248.5 INV 238.69 8" (IN -W) x �5R F ss 8"SS INV 246.25 8" (OUT- x 249.6 INV 238.69 8" (0 Ss 8"SS SS 8"SS SS S r� Ss Ss SS ( ) 8°55 SS - x G G x V G G G 8" GAS G G G --- � - ---- --- - -- - -- - - ---- - ---- --- -- _ -- ---- ----- \ x 253.3 x 55 9�----_---..... L /�4 CB -TC 251.51 ------------- CONCRETE x 249.7 - -- -- ------ 317 12 OUT E) 12"SD W x 2. x 254.5 O( "G.G.2 x 2249 z. x 248.8 x 248.4 x 24 .4 x 253.5 { CONCRETE _ t - - - x 252.5 IN 248.21 12" IN- _ x 257 7 - x 552 W W W NCRETE _ - - ---- - -----.-'�- - --..-_ _-. •Y-tT� G2NCRElE -- - -- -��--- ---- - _ - W --- - -� Il 6"V ATE x ._ O �s l.. W y } \ CONCRETE 8" ACP -........ rt 0..., •,.i r7'. --�.°T ❑OD - y. ....- o_o=252�4 DIRr�O o 5 .5CONCRETEx 2 4 OD 0-- I �z AC PAVEMENT AC PAVEMENT 25 I ❑ x 255.4 x 254.51 253.7 P T 44 ¢av ' 14 / 247.7x T1I h 24E CONCRETE 248.4 249.7 . 8 250.2 1i x x 255.8 UL`^ov Z �0-0 0-0 Doo } W 2V,N. N V) = O m T W 5 E W��E m °Zm� CCW O ra W JNu >C� M UM{/, x W T� Q V 1 � W U W J Z O m F --I w W W ^ LU Lr- w W 0 Ln ^� o T� O N W 11 0 ) TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley)))Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 Z KEYPLAN I- Date No. Description W d 3/23/18 Entitlements Submittal 2 U DATE APRIL, 2016 SCALE 1"=20' DESIGNER JRV DRAFTER CJ JOB Al 6056 SHEET 2 OF 3 SHEETS 11 0 ) TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley)))Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 1/03/18 Entitlements Submittal 1 3/23/18 Entitlements Submittal 2 6/20/18 Entitlements Submittal 3 �G LUGG 0 J w � O O W Z U U_ z z Z ZZ_ W > ~ W w vJ 0 N Project Number T-0323 Proto: Version: Config: Designed By J. Kirby Checked By M. Johnson EXISTING CONDITIONS ■ I 14 i a� x 247. I F - x AC PAVEMENT AC PAVEMENT ,. O W rr x 246.7 U- FLi-'� yF WNV. 4 . 2 ��� /-,�� 46.5 io �p�p�� 3 AC PA ENT FND 2"I/'1.8I`� O P..I 7 j mA"I U a B SS DISK j ce-T 1 a 7s � � � U x UUl t-d{�=p: I 46 ( -S I x 249. `x 248.2 p�` 7 45.1 U " O N'IN MON BOX 2"GAS G G DIRT 2"GAS ~ _ _ 242.9 »> x x 246 _-_---L - 2'GAS CONCRETE s� W x "5 6"WATER ,�----f x 248-8 C W--- W W W W CONCRETE zzz 243.4 0 6 WATER SSMH-RIM �Idf633 ------ -- _ - 6"WATER O -_---- -------- N, .. 24p.7 SSMH-RIM 249.93 ---.-- --_- -- x -- ---_ __ � INV 239.66 8 IN -N _-_----_-- --.--e1--x-7"44.. - ---. - -.-.- - ---- - w INV 245.10 6 (IN -N �' INV 243.63 6" (IN -N) x 246.6 INV 239.57 8" (IN -W) INV 244.88 8" (IN-) INV 243.13 8" (IN -W) U �' ._.n-• x 247.5 ALVES DRIVE I x 46.51NV 239.56 8" (OUT -E) 8"SS INV 244.87 8" (OUT E) x 250.7 INV 243.10 8" (OUT -E) LL Cf)O SS SS LL x 2 SS 8"SS SS SS SS '.-; SDM RIM 243.56 _ pl x 248.3 4 (A PUBLIC STREET) 1 tN239.26 12 IN -NW) F FO N N 89°58'56" E 842.34' x 246.7 �2147 O TNV 239.21 12" (IN -SW) �- FO FO FO f47.3 FO FO FO F ^ 1,.� FO t_ _ FO x 24$.7 _ _ _ x 247.6 _ ,. 246.3 270.00' x 245.3 /_ - INV 238.56 21" I - - - -� 1g1.22' 031.26) 249$ 270.00' - - - - - - - - - t' -�� Nv 73451 zt" (OUT-E)I 31.46' - 1 8"SD 18"SD - 18"SD x 'ii7 0 21 -SD o 21"SD o 21"SD o 21"SD o 21 -SD --r - 1 SDMH-RIM 251.22 U SDMH-RIM 250.03 U U SDMH-RIM 248.05 !41 SDMH-RIM 244.81 U U N Z J U W 1 INV 246.98 15 IN -S INV 246.99 12 IN -NW) LL INV 245.28 12" IN -N FND 2-1/2" BRASS DISK LL _J x 248.3 LL LL W 43:1 14 5 SDMH-RIM 246.71 x 246.4 FND 2-1/2" BRASS DISK x 245.5 W INV 240.57 12" (IN -N) % x 244 8 m0 LL LL F w N OU LL % LL _ I INV 246.74 12 (IN -N) INV 246.11 12" (IN -S) m N INV 245.00 18" (IN -W) m _ - - T-. ) INV 242.22 12 (ITV-) WITH PUNCH IN MON BOX _ INv 239.86 21" (IN -W) _ 11, _ v"' - N U U W w W �1- So INV 246.71 18.1(IN-W) INV 246.03 18" IN -W) BD O INV 244.94 21" (OUT -E) WITH PUNCH IN MON BOX x 248.9 N W O INV 243.15 21" (IN -W) INV 241.80 21" IN W x 24.x.8 ao i0 O - U co MIO Sti N o 'CITY OF CUPERTINO" _ �+ r - Ny. 243,1 t" (ouT-E) INV 241.56 21" (OUT -E) flP 6UPERTINO" 5] ( T -E) ri ri uic °' a N ri Z N 010 .� -- -- NV 239.82 21" OU -�` o I _ ` rte'- --- IN 246.61 18" OUT -E h INV 245.99 tE8 OUT -E O -- "CIT- --- Y'\ -- _N x 251.3 6"WATER 4 <o t O - O O 4 1-1- I EB CB TC 243.70 \ •' DIRT - --_ _ 0 ETE DRIVEWA � --; -_ -- _ `-� ,. ,NCR240.16 12 IN -S DIRT `-- � ----- ---- --- - --------- GIRT / __ �� T ---- .o I ( ) - 1 -1 x 249. ``-. N 89 58'56" E 58 4' (589.83 COONRRETE SIDEWALKO - HSBIB GIRT II - RWL x LL I INV 240.14 12" (OUT E) CONCRE� SIDEWALK �c \ x < RwL ssco--==------ zas.oz ssco 0 1 S DISK cork-- - ---- LL CB -TC 251.45 INV 247.05 12" (IN -SE) 25,GI1$V 246.95 12" (OUT -N) CB -TC 251.46 INV 247.40 12 (I SW) ;�VC O M 1�� x 245.3r�: 245.4 o {v �5.0' FC I CD 0.7'FC AC PAVEMENT AC PAVEMENT(W OF PL)x 243_ti 245.4 x x 246.5 76.8' BL x 243.5 • r • m x 244.5 � A1•' OGKO�K x as.s 24 R x 243.5 x 247.2 � x 246.7 /246.4 L • RWL x 244.4 J • 246.30 SSCO x 46.5 INV 240.30 (PP) F_ mg�� • �\ 5 `\ x-;471 ` (p2_� • �` EV x 246.3 _ x 246.6 \ t•;} O SSCO O •••• \ (PP) - i"• M ;••�• 243.$.._.. `x \x 247.2 2. x 246.4 459 .::.. X� \ '•i. UE x 246.1.3 ..... GEN x \ DI -RIM 245.87 - - �,.. INV 241.67 12 WT -NE X • x 247.5 AC PAVEMENT x 246.6 __ • 246.8E f - 4 x 246.5 x 244.4 243.8 6' CLF x 247.5 ENCLOSURE 247, x 246.7 x 244.2 v x x 247.6 x 246.6 CK ,K SSCO 241.4 7 O SSCO Note: The underground locating CONCRETE I� company was not able to i 5 0 4. c 5' c o / 75.5' L_ 244.1 x 245.3 �, .7' 250.i`� U OD LL 1 m m r - - - - - - - - - MV 240.27 12 250. L„-_:- - - L6 L6 24f.5 Wap ,-. (UT )N) INV 240.25 12' IN -S tW OF PL)CITY CONCRETE RAMP Fn atf 250.3 50.5 a �x 245.4 � 250 "C' ' 250 3 2 O M 1�� x 245.3r�: 245.4 o {v �5.0' FC I CD 0.7'FC AC PAVEMENT AC PAVEMENT(W OF PL)x 243_ti 245.4 x x 246.5 76.8' BL x 243.5 • r • m x 244.5 � A1•' OGKO�K x as.s 24 R x 243.5 x 247.2 � x 246.7 /246.4 L • RWL x 244.4 J • 246.30 SSCO x 46.5 INV 240.30 (PP) F_ mg�� • �\ 5 `\ x-;471 ` (p2_� • �` EV x 246.3 _ x 246.6 \ t•;} O SSCO O •••• \ (PP) - i"• M ;••�• 243.$.._.. `x \x 247.2 2. x 246.4 459 .::.. X� \ '•i. UE x 246.1.3 ..... GEN x \ DI -RIM 245.87 - - �,.. INV 241.67 12 WT -NE X • x 247.5 AC PAVEMENT x 246.6 __ • 246.8E f - 4 x 246.5 x 244.4 243.8 6' CLF x 247.5 ENCLOSURE 247, x 246.7 x 244.2 v x x 247.6 x 246.6 CK ,K SSCO 241.4 7 O SSCO Note: The underground locating CONCRETE I� company was not able to i 5 0 4. c 5' c o / 75.5' L_ 244.1 x 245.3 �, .7' WITH PUNCH IN N BOX 2 U OD LL �l m m r - - - - - - - - - MV 240.27 12 OF CUPER O" L„-_:- - - L6 L6 24f.5 Wap ,-. (UT )N) INV 240.25 12' IN -S tW OF PL)CITY CONCRETE RAMP Fn atf 50.5 a �x 245.4 O M 1�� x 245.3r�: 245.4 o {v �5.0' FC I CD 0.7'FC AC PAVEMENT AC PAVEMENT(W OF PL)x 243_ti 245.4 x x 246.5 76.8' BL x 243.5 • r • m x 244.5 � A1•' OGKO�K x as.s 24 R x 243.5 x 247.2 � x 246.7 /246.4 L • RWL x 244.4 J • 246.30 SSCO x 46.5 INV 240.30 (PP) F_ mg�� • �\ 5 `\ x-;471 ` (p2_� • �` EV x 246.3 _ x 246.6 \ t•;} O SSCO O •••• \ (PP) - i"• M ;••�• 243.$.._.. `x \x 247.2 2. x 246.4 459 .::.. X� \ '•i. UE x 246.1.3 ..... GEN x \ DI -RIM 245.87 - - �,.. INV 241.67 12 WT -NE X • x 247.5 AC PAVEMENT x 246.6 __ • 246.8E f - 4 x 246.5 x 244.4 243.8 6' CLF x 247.5 ENCLOSURE 247, x 246.7 x 244.2 v x x 247.6 x 246.6 CK ,K SSCO 241.4 7 O SSCO Note: The underground locating CONCRETE I� company was not able to SCALE WALLED ENCLOSURE INV 247.39 15" (0IT-N) JRV "FIRE PUMP ROOM" that services this existing JOB R=20.00' building. <= 3 /} x20.1' FC 20.1FC 24f.5 D=89°56'29" 250.7 16 ° 2°1 6 258 31.40' AC PAVEMENT x 250.2 w x 251.2 x 2501.4 I� SITE DIRT DIRTr % tDIRT�. ACCESS <1I3 \� IS �G GG 3 � Project Number T-0323 Proto: 251.8 Config: x 249.7 Checked By M. Johnson EXISTING CONDITIONS ■ I x 25x.3 CONC I U I 250.2 3p 249.6 8" PIPE THROUGH WALL x RAMP x 251. RWL 8. / x 251.8 250.2 / x 251'6 DI - RIM 249.10 249'7 I INV 247.37 12 IN -S) I INV 247.27 12" OUT -NW) / -L30.00'-- 30.00' l AC PAVEMENT DIRT S 250.3 0 �1= AD -RIM 24938 INV 247.23 12"(I11 -S) - - - - INV 247.23 12°(OUT-N) 3 x 251.6 - DIRT 251 PIPE TH O'GHWALL 2 251�a 7 1 x 250.2 AC PAVEMENT i J1 x 251.9 1249.3 � x 250-4 t x 251.7 39 39 40 IDo 3 250.6 -Ion 1 1 2 .1 x 250. -_ 4 / -. ❑ x 1252.` I 250.7 1 25'__3 t 1.3'SL x 250.5 DIRT � B w 1�1 C 250.9 DI -RIM 249.71 257.4 INV 24746 12 I - INV 247.46 12" OUT -N) x 250.6 1 x 252.2 SII 250.5 0 1 �I O M 1�� x 245.3r�: 245.4 o {v �5.0' FC I CD 0.7'FC AC PAVEMENT AC PAVEMENT(W OF PL)x 243_ti 245.4 x x 246.5 76.8' BL x 243.5 • r • m x 244.5 � A1•' OGKO�K x as.s 24 R x 243.5 x 247.2 � x 246.7 /246.4 L • RWL x 244.4 J • 246.30 SSCO x 46.5 INV 240.30 (PP) F_ mg�� • �\ 5 `\ x-;471 ` (p2_� • �` EV x 246.3 _ x 246.6 \ t•;} O SSCO O •••• \ (PP) - i"• M ;••�• 243.$.._.. `x \x 247.2 2. x 246.4 459 .::.. X� \ '•i. UE x 246.1.3 ..... GEN x \ DI -RIM 245.87 - - �,.. INV 241.67 12 WT -NE X • x 247.5 AC PAVEMENT x 246.6 __ • 246.8E f - 4 x 246.5 x 244.4 243.8 6' CLF x 247.5 ENCLOSURE 247, x 246.7 x 244.2 v x x 247.6 x 246.6 CK ,K SSCO 241.4 7 O SSCO Note: The underground locating CONCRETE I� company was not able to SCALE WALLED ENCLOSURE locate the fire service line JRV "FIRE PUMP ROOM" that services this existing JOB A16056 building. Entitlements Submittal 1 3 /} 3 6/20/18 24f.5 DIRT x 247.2 " n 247.0 x 247.3 47.7 x 247.2 METAL CA N RACK (TYP.) 3 x 247 7 x 247.4 AC PAVEMENT 248. / O x 252.3 a - I 246.9 J 10.0' FG x 252.2 DIRT 250.5 } 'kJ x 250.7 2 B" PIPE THROUGH WALL DIRT x 247.6 x 244.4 (1) 4° PIPE THROUGH WALL`' � EB SII o CONCRETE GUTTER GUTTER TE :_z x 42 4.2 a I 251.2 C .5 4"FS FS IIIA x 252.7 x 252.5 1 - AC PAVEMENT i x 250.7 x 249.4 W 3 - --2 DIRT O -,� - ,/" 247.7 S $ 252.2 z 252.5 M " �, /,„. N O l 251.3 25p-6 �- o � ) .-" ' x 2 AC PAVEMENT " -�- THRESHOLD 1250.3 x 241- 1 y c. U.1 CONCRETEx N r: 2 25 N 25x2 251.5 250.6 x 5.9 O DI -RIM 249.83 INV 247.76 12 OUT -N 5.0' FC IC 251.6 r -� 250.4 x 2 10 I o f I Z x 253.2 �- 41 253.4 x 251.2 DIRT 411,11F_ x 247.5 31 x 251.7 246B5Z8 1 x 253.3x 2 253.2 253.6 251.8 250.6 / 48.3 I I I � � B x 251.3 _ 1 .1 20745 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD / _ I o ONE STORY BUILDING J 35.1' BUILDING HEIGHT a 246.9 r 252 rn 253. x 253.4 v l . x 251.8 128,567 ± SQ. FT. z- �i Imo. '•'$.5 - "x 250.8 (PER EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS) k ¢� 2 _ EB �n �j W as x 253.6 DIRT -77 �m � �� i �o 2a 6 O H DIRT v z 251.6 � � / 45.3 V x 25 PARCEL ONE 248.5 d N m 253.6 ELECTRIC BOX 0 20 40 60 1249.2 o p�LL (PAINTN M,12,NGSD10 PARCEL I o 1U of x 2 - DIRT ) $258 ACRES ? 245.3 � a a ' m U Scale 1 " = 20 ft - 253.6 v= 9 9 N x 248.3 252.3 I f N aN no 1 .0' BL N BW 11 x 24 .7 RWL CONC GUTTER ap N N f 169.7' BL P.3' 329' 3' 24 29.8' T 4 x 253. x 252.2 - § / / / / - - - W 245.60 LIP a :.n io 0. ti ti 9 1 `6 I I 1. 1 NSSCO 251.25 SSCO 246 02 TC yr n o; m :................................ ..... .'�:......... ......................:u?: 1...... ....................... 2-... 1 1. .x.. n.... n.J''- DIRT 1 " r LL ._ 1 .... ..... .......... - 42 25 '„ 245.56 FL O oty ' 245.74 LP .21 SSCO etl 1. 6 0 .............................. ... i fl, . CO (PP) 1. I BW� 251.4 10 3' ' 10.3' 251.32 SS _ PLANTER,..,., � O � '. 4 . 1 • _� - a 4"SD q' 14 246.12 TR ® O 251.23 SSCO PLANTER PLANTER 3 PLANTER CONCRETE I - ) 249.8 " I 54.3 245.65 FL Q 1 1 CONCRETE SIDEWALK - - x 751 , _ _ ._ - M 245.70 LIP / GREASE INTERCEPTOR 25 _ _. 249. 251.4 242.8 BO YOM x 251,2 x 251.2 o cv -t I I � GREASE INTERCEPTOR r1.1 ,r` 6 DIRT x 252.3 ,,, N246.79 4" ((IN -W) x 251.2} x 25 0 EB O CONCRETE \ 1.4 �1t16- 24576 BR W x 7153. I H % "� 245.64 TO BOTTOM SIGN • • 250. - -/ `� ' 251.4 x 250.87 SSCO 4- - - yy i N 2q 7 W. BW 245.67 FL I L MATC H LI 1o.r Fc 253 2 51.35 () = SS ss , , �- -I 8 - / MAT NEI 3 x 251.6 GREASE INTERCEPTOR 251.3 FLUSH CURB x 250.5 3 242.7 TO BOTTOM CONCRETE BALL BOLLARD TYP. L N x 252.6 2 1. x x......, m U c moo x 252.9 AC PAVEMENT 2812 � x 250.6 m J 248.38 SSCO � A SITE � + SEE S H E E i 3 x 252.4 "� x .8 - x 249.5 b 246.5 aD p SEE H x 250.8 2 .9 x 250.8 x F O) LL I I - CCE$$ 250__ 1 AC PAVEMENT o SITE 250.3 M I O 251.5 AC PAVEMENT 246.51 C ACCESS x 250.2 � 248.3 x n AC PAVEMENT R 253.3 x 250.7 G I 250.8 -1 4°GAS 2x - 245.85 FL o 3 x 252.7 OJ x 250.6 x 25Q3 AC PAVEMENT _ G 245.97 LIP 1 r x 253.5 2524 251.6 z .7�� N 89°55'27 E 158.1 Ox (158.00') FND 2-1/2" BRASSi o 0 9 2 8 SG 6 x 250.6 x 250.4 25 M1 248.5 I x 248DISK �� 7' E 80.00' C=Dx 250.7 `--- _ - -- IN M N BOX 246.06 BR AC PAVEMENT x 25 .5 x 249.7 - _ _ _ 246.98 FL F DIRT p RAMP DIRT E 24646.7 GRN 1 B W x 2 .3 I . V x 2526 x 251. x 250.7 W M o 248.0 LIP METAL CART RETU K TYP. M x'" - - I^-�x 249,4 Q 1 253.5 w �.� 250.3 2so. 11.5' FC v 1 I I r 115" � o N n � F O F Z O 0 w N W 2 O z u z � w a a � W 6 U�v Z NI4 n N n n op a0 0 0 a LU F- Ce 2NN N C � N m Oi ` W �a 5 Wt•E Z v w CaU� Z� ou m ro" ce W I..1, O 0 W J'Au X C) N �1 U M M 1n �4 Q Z ce O LL. J U DATE APRIL, 2016 SCALE 1"=20' DESIGNER JRV DRAFTER CJ JOB A16056 SHEET Entitlements Submittal 1 3 OF 3 SHEETS 11 0 ) TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley)))Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 1/03/18 Entitlements Submittal 1 3/23/18 Entitlements Submittal 2 6/20/18 Entitlements Submittal 3 �G GG 0 J YO O w z U U_ z z z z W �~ W w V ) 0 N Project Number T-0323 Proto: Version: Config: Designed By J. Kirby Checked By M. Johnson EXISTING CONDITIONS ■ ME w --------- --- SD SD TYP. ,r-- R/W ALVE'S (A PUBL SD� S'1'IEV I;N S C;KJEIE1�:_BU U LE V ARD (A PUBLIC SHEET) X �D C---- - - N LEGEND EX. DRIVEWAY SD — — — — 16------- e LI II LI LI u �I oaa. ' � L RIGHT OF WAY & PROPERTY LINE CENTERLINE LIMIT OF WORK SAWCUT LINE CONCRETE SIDEWALK ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVERS TRUNCATED DOMES LANDSCAPE BIORETENTION AREA ENHANCED PAVING / KEY NOTES PROPOSED O1 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO PUBLIC RIGHT—OF—WAY. DRIVE UP LANE. O2 REMOVE EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN AND REPLACE WITH UPDATED GRAPHICS. PROPOSED O3 PROPOSED REMOVABLE BOLLARDS. 15 O4 CLEAN AND RESTRIPE EXISTING ASPHALT PARKING LOT. � pl ADA RAMP. CONFIGURATION OF PARKING STALLS TO MATCH EXISTING. PROPOSED 4A CLEAN AND RESTRIPE EXISTING ASPHALT PARKING LOT. PROPOSED GREEN SCREEN. PROPOSED CONFIGURATION OF PARKING STALLS AS SHOWN. 17 O5 PROPOSED CURB. I� 18 PROPOSED � � 6 O PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVERS. TOTAL O7 PROPOSED STORE ENTRANCE. TRASH COMPACTOR ENCLOSURE WITH ROOF PER CITY O8 PROPOSED LANDSCAPED ENTRANCE PLAZA. PROPOSED O9 PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO PUBLIC RIGHT—OF—WAY. ELECTRICAL GENERATOR WITH ENCLOSURE. 20 DECRETIVE CONCRETE. DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF CURPERTINO STANDARD DETAIL 10 PROPOSED EV CHARGING STALLS (31 TOTAL). 1-21. 11 EXISTING BUS SHELTER AND SIGNAGE. / 12 EXISTING TRASH COMPACTOR TO REMAIN. PROPOSED 13 PROPOSED DRIVE UP LANE. / 14 PROPOSED ORDER PICKUP ENTRY. 26 15 PROPOSED DRIVE UP STORE ACCESS. � pl ADA RAMP. 28 PROPOSED I I 16 PROPOSED GREEN SCREEN. PROPOSED 17 PROPOSED PLANTER (TYP). I� 18 PROPOSED DRIVE—UP BEACON. III � 1-20. TOTAL 528 PROPOSED TRASH COMPACTOR ENCLOSURE WITH ROOF PER CITY 33 OF CUPERTINO PROPOSED BIKE RACKS. PROPOSED ELECTRICAL GENERATOR WITH ENCLOSURE. 20 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF CURPERTINO STANDARD DETAIL GSF BUILDING 36 1-21. SCULPTURED BENCH, SEE ARTIST PLANS FOR DETAILS. II I 21 PROPOSED SIDEWALK. 22 BIKE REPAIR STATION. 23 PROPOSED SPHERICAL BOLLARDS. 24 PROPOSED WASTE TRIO STATION AND CIGARETTE BUTT URN. 25 TRUNCATED DOMES. 26 PROPOSED BIKE LOCKER. 27 PROPOSED ADA RAMP. 28 PROPOSED VALLEY GUTTER. 29 BIORETENTION AREA 30 PROPOSED CIGARETTE BUTT URN. 31 PROPOSED BACKLESS BENCH WITH DIVIDERS. 32 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF CUPERTINO STANDARD DETAIL 1 AMBULATORY) 1-20. TOTAL 528 PROPOSED TRASH COMPACTOR ENCLOSURE WITH ROOF PER CITY 33 OF CUPERTINO MUNICIPAL CODE. 34 PROPOSED ELECTRICAL GENERATOR WITH ENCLOSURE. 35 PROPOSED MECHANICAL YARD WITH ENCLOSURE. GSF BUILDING 36 PROPOSED SCULPTURED BENCH, SEE ARTIST PLANS FOR DETAILS. GENERAL NOTES 1. A PHOTOMETRIC STUDY WILL BE PROVIDED AS PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT SUBMISSION IN COMPLIANCE WITH CMC 19.60 LIGHTING STANDARDS. CUPERTINO REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM OF 10% OF ANY PARKING LOT AREA SHALL BE LANDSCAPED. MINIMUM PLANTER DIMENSION 4' WIDTH/LENGTH OR 25 SF. MINIMUM OF 4' WIDE PLANTING STRIP BETWEEN ROWS OF PARKING. MINIMUM OF 4' WIDE PLANTING STRIP BETWEEN BUILDING OR WALKS AND PARKING ROWS. PERIMETER — MINIMUM OF 6' WIDE ISLANDS BETWEEN EVERY 6 SPACES. PERIMETER — MINIMUM OF 3' LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITHIN LOT LINE. PERIMETER — AT ROW 3' LANDSCAPE BUFFER AND 3' HIGH SCREEN WALL/FENCE/PLANTING. IF PLANTING MUST REACH 2' HEIGHT WITHIN 18 MONTHS. STEVENS CREEK BLVD. — MINIMUM 10' WIDE CURBSIDE PLANTING STRIP AND 6' SIDEWALK AND MINIMUM OF BACK OF WALK PLANTING STRIP MINIMUM OF 10'. ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES — MINIMUM 5' PLANTING AREA ADJACENT TO FENCE (MIN. 6' — MAX 8') OR WALL WITH EVERGREEN TREES AT 25' O.C. SEPARATION OF PARKING FROM BUILDING — MINIMUM 3' WIDE PLANTING AND MINIMUM OF 5' WIDE SIDEWALK. HEAT ISLAND REDUCTION — AT LEAST 50% OF NON PLANTED AREA IS TO BE SHADED. IF BY TREES, WITHIN 15 YEARS OF GROWTH. MINIMUM OF 10% OF PARKING LOT AREA IS TO BE PLANTING. MINIMUM OF 2.5% OF GROSS FLOOR AREA TO COMMON OPEN SPACE. ONE TREE PER EVERY 5 PARKING STALLS. PARKING TABLE — PARCEL 1 EXISTING REQUIRED PROVIDED REGULAR 517 472 453 6/20/18 Entitlements Submittal 3 11 TOTAL 13 TOTAL ADA 11 (2 VAN) (2 VAN) 31 TOTAL 31 TOTAL ELEC. (1 ACCESSIBLE (1 ACCESSIBLE VEHICLE 0 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE 1 AMBULATORY) 1 AMBULATORY) TOTAL 528 514 507 4.12 PARKING 4.00 PARKING 3.88 PARKING RATIO SPACES PER 1,000 SPACES PER 1,000 SPACES PER 1,000 Config: GSF BUILDING GSF BUILDING GSF BUILDING C100 AREA AREA AREA 128,429 GSF COMMERCIAL RETAIL BLDG. © 4 PARKING SPACES PER 1,000 GSF = 514 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED 28 BICYCLE 0 26 (2 LONG TERM BIKE PARKING SPOTS) OUTDOOR SEATING 40 SEATS PROVIDED 128,429 GSF COMMERCIAL RETAIL BLDG. ® 1 BICYCLE SPACES PER 5,000 GSF = 26 BICYCLE SPACES REQUIRED GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 80 (:i) TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley*Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 1/03/18 Entitlements Submittal 1 3/23/18 Entitlements Submittal 2 6/20/18 Entitlements Submittal 3 �O`v G� LU 0 J U m� Y � p w0) Z VU N cn O L.L Z Z_ LU LU ~ LU � U� U �� CD N Project Number T-0323 Proto: Version: Config: Designed By J. Kirby Checked By M. Johnson SITE PLAN C100 - I - 13 A - -- --- --- ----- - FO ALVES DRIVE - 250.51 FS So - _ MATCH EX. --__ - - - -- --- I III I I I I I I I I I- I I I�hl� �- •'I� EXISTING POINT OF STOP I CONNECTION TO CITY STORM H4 a I DRAIN SYSTEM TO REMAIN. f �1 251.28 FS r -- ------- MATCH EX. I FO EXISTING POINT OF CONNECTION TO CITY STORM ° DRAIN SYSTEM TO REMAIN. KSQ ------------------ IAI\II (251.30 FFE) I I I II \ H FO - - EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET TO REMAIN - - (TG: 244.27) 1 Ile/ o I®t, EXISTING STORM DRAIN I I 251.43 FS I I � INLET TO REMAIN MATCH EX. -- (TG: 249.09) 1 PROPOSED RELOCATION OF O / \ 3 OVERFLOW INLET ° I BMP #3 4 F I I 251.73 FS I 6 s I /i MATCH EX. I 4 � I (249.52 FL) EXISTING STORM DRAIN EXISTING STORM DRAIN r INLET TO BE RELOCATED INLET TO REMAIN (TG:249.40) (TG: 245.90) so 0 - I I 1/ 3 PROPOSED RELOCATION OF O _ r4OPERT'Y 6 3 OVERFLOW INLETBMP 2 4 4 6 I LINE I I 252.09 FS MATCH EX. I DMA 2 (249.77 FL) EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET TO BE RELOCATED (251.30 FFE);:;:;:;: (TG: 249.88) ::(250.15 FL) PROPOSED RELOCATION OF O -I W BMP #1 OVERFLOW INLET I I I 251.26 FS - I / I MATCH EX. 6250.09 FS 252.54 FS y .� EXISTING STORM DRAIN C I MATCH EX I I NMATCH EX. I 253.17 FS ,, 4" -' o INLET TO BE RELOCATED (TG: 249.83) I 251.71 FS ; MATCH EX.� 251.30 DOOR 0 250.26 FS i. I I� 251.30 DOOR �• ?o 251.30 DOOR I �J 253.42 FS U I I 253.50 FS ;® f o �__� Q I - 5.0% ® 1.8% I I I DMA 1 250.80 FS • ::: I 250.48 FS .. I I 252.76 FS 1(251.30 FFE) ' ' ' ' ' ' I - o / MATCH EX. 251.30 DOOR 251.30 DOOR 251.30 DOOR I I / I ® -- - ,`, _I II_ 248.77 FS - 253.58 FS ° .. .. » - ° J I =MATCH EX. ® 000 0 o ! ! ! o �� I 245.94 FS I ' -- QQQ �'1QQ �QQ I I I MATCH EX.j I� D , I I �I 252.78 FS I . ------- 2 250.92 FS 250.18 FS 249.51 FS O I 'MATCH EX. I I I I I 251.04 FS _ "' MATCH EX. MATCH EX. i 247.92 FS MATCH EX. I - _ _ I I II �'• � 1 I � III; � � to I �� I • I - - 1 I I ::50 2. 250.76 FS ..,�.�.. 42 F� S --- --- i --� _® ® I------ ---� � � 246.23 FS � 253.23 FS \ I I ,� ` ,/ - MATCH X. MATCH EX. j I \ c 250.47 FS I _ 249.98 FS = / I A . I EXISTING STORM DRAIN I INLET TO REMAIN I / i I i 11 (TG: 248.86) I i \ 250.70 SFS / �, EXISTING STORM DRAIN so J, 4INLET TO REMAIN I o \ \ �O� \ 0� �O�\ (TG: 248.29) I W I 253.71 FS MATCH EX. I I I I 1 ,� II 254.32 FS1-O- � MATCH EX. I i V 252.74 FS -- � - --- \ ----------I---- I I I •I I \ I I I I" 252.95 FS I ,I I I�InI MATCH EX. 1� I 253.99 FS _ 253.55 FS \ I I - - - - 254.67 FS - - - 253.35 FS 251.57 FS 251.14 FST 249.68 FS - - MATCH EX. MATCH EX. MATCH EX. MATCH EX. - MATCH EX. - EXISTING POINT OF _ CONNECTION TO CITY STORM _ -- STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD DRAIN SYSTEM TO REMAIN. - ��_ LU25 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 80 -6+/ LEGEND ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE - STREET CENTERLINE - - - PROPERTY LINE - EASEMENT LINE Description CIVIL LIMIT OF WORK LINE TOTAL DMA BOUNDARY LINE - - FLOW LINE TOTAL AREA PROPOSED 6" STORM DRAIN LINE PERVIOUS EXISTING 12" STORM DRAIN LINE R RIDGE LINE 10 SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION --11111111110- STORM DRAIN FLOW DIRECTION a Z, a STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT AREA DECORATIVE PAVERS OF IMPROVEMENT 43,700 SF LANDSCAPE AREA 10,300 SF -- _- BIORETENTION AREA DMA 2 EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLET 1,400 SF 12,700 SF 435 SF PROPOSED STORM DRAIN INLET. INLET TO BE DMA 3 MARKED WITH "NO DUMPING FLOWS TO BAY" 342.50 TC 30,350 SF 342.00 FS PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION 342.50 TC) EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION (342.00 FS) 1,280 SF GRADING DRAINAGE NOTES OCURB AND GUTTER OVALLEY GUTTER O3 6" PVC STORM DRAIN PIPE O2.0' WIDE CURB CUTS AT BASIN INLETS O5 OVERFLOW INLET FOR 100 -YEAR STORM OBIORETENTION AREA OMATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATION GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS ARE TO BE FITTED WITH FULL TRASH CAPTURE DEVICES THAT MEET THE CALIFORNIA WATER BOARD'S FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM DEFINITION AND ARE CERTIFIED FOR INSTALLATION BY THE STATE WATER BOARD EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. 2. ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS, PROPOSED AND EXISTING TO REMAIN, MUST BE CLEARLY MARKED WITH "NO DUMPING FLOWS TO BAY". STORMWATER TREATMENT SIZING SUMMARY ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE EXISTING INLETS TO EXISTING INLETS TO TOTAL REQUIRED PROVIDED No. Description TOTAL TOTAL TREATMENT (4% BIORETENTION TREATMENT TOTAL AREA IMPERVIOUS PERVIOUS OF IMPERVIOUS TREATMENT 5 10 AREA AREA AREA) AREA EXISTING CONDITIONS AREA OF IMPROVEMENT 43,700 SF 33,400 SF 10,300 SF -- 550 SF AREA DMA 2 14,100 SF 1,400 SF 12,700 SF 435 SF PROPOSED DMA 3 34,000 SF 3,650 SF 30,350 SF 435 SF CONDITIONS OF 43,700 SF 32,000 SF 11,700 SF 1,280 SF 1,420 SF IMPROVEMENT AREA PROPOSED STORMWATER TREATMENT SUMMARY ALTERNATIVE COMPLIANCE EXISTING INLETS TO EXISTING INLETS TO TOTAL Date No. Description 1/03/18 TOTAL INLETS TOTAL PROVIDED TREATMENT INLETS TOTAL AREA IMPERVIOUS 3 5 5 10 PERVIOUS AREA TREATMENT* TYPE AREA DMA 1 24,600 SF 3,000 SF 21,600 SF 550 SF BIORETENTION (BMP #1) DMA 2 14,100 SF 1,400 SF 12,700 SF 435 SF BIORETENTION (BMP #2) DMA 3 34,000 SF 3,650 SF 30,350 SF 435 SF BIORETENTION (BMP #3) TOTAL 72,700 SF 8,050 64,650 SF 1,420 SF -- *DMA'S 1-3 TREATMENT AREAS ARE LESS THAN 4% OF THEIR TRIBUTARY AREA. WE ARE PROPOSING TO ONLY TREAT WHAT IS REQUIRED FOR OUR SITE AND THE ADDITIONAL FLOW FROM DMA'S 1-3 WILL BE SENT TO AN OVERFLOW INLET WITHIN THE BIORETENTION AREA. SITE STORM DRAIN INLETS TOTAL EXISTING EXISTING INLETS TO EXISTING INLETS TO TOTAL PROPOSED Date No. Description 1/03/18 TOTAL INLETS INLETS BE RELOCATED REMAIN INLETS INLETS 6/20/18 8 3 5 5 10 (E) TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley)))Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 1/03/18 Entitlements Submittal 1 3/23/18 Entitlements Submittal 2 6/20/18 Entitlements Submittal 3 F0 \O\ ,p Gp ID J U m� „ Yo 0 wrn Z < C) O z Z Z w LU ~ LUw U� 0 N Project Number T-0323 Proto: Version: Config: Designed By J. Kirby Checked By M. Johnson PRELIMINARY WCP, GRADING DRAINAGE PLAN ■ TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley)))Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 2 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 3 PROJECT: Target PROJECT: Target 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 'p Ge� Consulting Arborist Amended Report The Target at the Cupertino store, located at 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd., Cupertino, CA, is scheduled for improvements and requires tree removals. Ruben Green from Project Number T-0323 Proto: Version: Config: Drawn By M. Morgan Checked By R. Kopff g 3 4 A e • 4 �. _; � O� � � 'pAl6 H33U� SN3/,315 S6[02 0:¢ a 0 vo'orllla3ano � � M Wr= /. gas Evergreen Arborists Consultants was asked to perform a site inspection and prepare an � now.LO E J arborist report. In preparation of this report, Kimley-Horn provided a survey of 47 �= Prepared for: numbered trees that are shown on the initial Tree Disposition Plan TD1.1, attached. 1- Matthew J. Morgan, PLA, ASLA surveyed the 47 trees located in the Target parking lot planters on February 17, 2018. E ! EE 1, ., i Landscape Architecture p The tree inventory provides the species, condition, trunk diameter, approximate canopy Kimley-Horn width and height, and a photo of each tree from the site. Each tree photo has the tree Ml 'R�t isAi =:K:K=:=,;�,,_ > KK K, -K K•••.-.. K• ,K K=K'K i K 4s¢9 C� 401 B Street Suite 600 number that correspond to the numbered trees on the L1.3 plan. I also downloaded an i i ,latz i i ci 'P iii 1114 San Diego CA, 92101 aerial image of the property and depict locations of the numbered trees.:.4`s Direct: 619.272.7192 b Of the 47 trees, one tree was removed and only the stump remained. Many of the i_;i. rr w� ` YYgy e3 a lisE ��. Jmp • i - g r E KP +EEPF t 1 F EE°E FEPf E e r t F F r' E f , , E E ! €; _ ; ^ j ; i , µ ; , 11 w4 C."�aPY���' , , . PROJECT: trees had numbered galvanized tags nailed to the tree trunks which are referenced in i, i ,;, ;,°t= Target my spreadsheet. I assign a condition rating to each tree baased on the following: y s fla 4ii�e w i ° F q+ 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd Very good A healthy vigourous tree, reasonably free of signs and symptoms of Cupertino, CA 95014disease; good structure and form typical of the species. �> -- Prepared by: Evergreen Arborists Consultants, Inc. Good Tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, thinning of crown, leaf color, minor trunk damage; moderate structural defects _R N _ 1T ,.i , -- -- poor 5143 Poston Drive that might be mitigated with regualr care. San Jose, CA 95136 Fair Tree in decline, epicormic extensive dieback of medium to large I } � 0 Li��I,d17tiCSTLT_ 650.644.6115 growth, branches; significant structural defects that cannot be abated. I � f �; �; I" l May 8, 2018 - i� Poor Tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and/or trunk; most of foliage from epicormics; extensive structural defects that cannot be I ;° L j abated. I -- il- ll ii r rPVN-i rill �I I Dead Tree must be removed. ' Ever reeN p I ; �'� ARBORIST CONSULTANTS The survey shows one dead alder (tree # 1), which should be removed to prevent iiinu E�'� .111 n„� EE:: .'- � �� 1IE. �� 1 1 �r 1 potential potential damage to persons or property. One evergreen pear (tree #18) is in poor . [I1111[rJ11[I1[111�t t� 1', IT #31) is in fair both be The condition and one maple (tree condition; should removed. remaining trees are in good condition. I — A Tree Disposition Plan L1.3 4 5 6 PROJECT: Target PROJECT: Target PROJECT: Target 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 Tree # Tree # ,-_V 7c - r on site -Height- -Canopy Width - Aluminum on site -Height- -Canopy Width- Aluminum -% �• fr.r .' �' ~ ~ plan Species -Common Name Condition feet feet -DBH - inches tree tag # plan Species -Common Name Condition feet feet -DBH- inches tree tag # 1 Alder Dead 20 20x20 12 13 45 Silk floss Good 22 20x20 22 NA Q Q Q Q a I V1122 . , 9-10 11, — - `, Silk floss Good 20 20x20 12 NA 3 Jacaranda Good 27 28x30 14 61 46 Jacaranda 47 Flowering Cherry Good 20 30x30 20 Good 6 10x10 6 NA NA 4 Maple Good 10 10x10 4/5/4/4 81 1 5 Bradford pear Good 25 20x24 11 79 6 Bradford pear Good 25 32x30 13 78 0,13 I 044 7 Bradford pear Good 19 20x16 6 77 8 Bradford pear Good 25 24x26 13 76 Q14 n n Q 3�`s 4 9 Bradford pear Good 16 14x16 7 68 016 X17 89 018 42 199 ! 10 Bradford pear Good 13 10x12 5 69 11 Bradford Good 16 16x14 10 70 2 -'!' ■%Q _ .20 Qi4 pear j Q n21 j� k V 7s 12 Bradford pear Good 19 16x14 9 71 >� 5 022 Q , �0 923 13 Evergreen pear Good 16 14x16 5 143 L 24 - - di. r .1 QQi �25 35 37 3�'' ` 14 Evergreen pear Good 17 10x12 5 141 15 Bradford pear Good 20 10x12 4 140 0 Q Q Q Q Q QQ CiQ a r 728 3 3 38 16 Bradford pear Good 13 6x4 2 139 17 Bradford pear Good 21 1416 4 137 \ \ - 18 Evergreen pear Poor 14 18x14 4 136 ' 03132 ; "3'f, cm I 19 Evergreen pear Good 22 18x22 8 135 ' ly - : , : " a :► 20 Evergreen pear Good 21 12x16 6 134 21 Evergreen pear Good 21 16x16 7 133 C22 46 Evergreen pear Good 16 12x14 6 132 23 Evergreen pear Good 14 24x12 6 131 1 cm', p - i - ; • � y ' „ • 24 Evergreen pear Good 13 20x12 4 130 25 Evergreen pear Good 15 24x12 5 129 26 Maple Good 7 12x10 4/3/4/4/3 80 `� -• �,.�,• 27 Crape myrtle Good 10 6x8 6 128 28 Crape myrtle Good 14 12x12 6 127 �� 29 Maple Good 11 12x16 3/3/3/3 95 30 Maple Good 10 24x16 4/3/4 96 31 Maple Fair 6 10x12 3/2/4/3 97 Aerial image of the property showing the locations of the trees. 32 Maple Good 5 8x10 2/2/3/3 98 33 Maple Good 6 2x2 1 NA 34 Maple Good 6 12x10 4/3/2/3 109 35 Crape myrtle Good 14 12x16 4/3/2/3 126 36 Crape myrtle Good 14 10x8 4 125 37 Crape myrtle Good 17 16x16 5 124 38 Crape myrtle Good 16 18x20 5 123 39 Stump only NA 40 Crape myrtle Good 12 16x14 3/2/3/3 NA 41 Crape myrtle Good 11 2422 3/2/2/3/3 NA 42 Crape myrtle Good 12 12x16 4/2/3/3 NA 43 Crape myrtle Good 11 8x12 3/3/3 NA 44 Crape myrtle Good 11 8x14 3/3/3 NA TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley)))Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 'p Ge� LU J U m� Y O OLO LJJ CA Z v0 Z Z Z W >~ W W f� ::) U Lr)� 0 N Project Number T-0323 Proto: Version: Config: Drawn By M. Morgan Checked By R. Kopff ARBORIST REPORT TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley)))Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description ... ••- PROJECT. Target 1 - - -- •20745 Stevens-- • Cupertino, CA 95014 91, -0- 3 7 14 �.: ^?'� • �` '0' _ ��._ 'A � � •v •._ - - ' Pt . 7��� t .n!/!// ��_. _ .r•��, �.' ��,.+1>. .ayT ' .� •yam' t � /'�1, � / 1' � � �� .o ..c.I. C �•� y�' ►�VR.' ;t , tr� �.'�/ UJG� 0 J U m� w Y OO O LLJ W VJ Z U U_ z O Z Z W >~ W W U U Lq� ti 0 N Project Number T-0323 Proto: Version: Config: Drawn By M. Morgan Checked By R. Kopff ARBORIST REPORT 0 ' `,`. `•�' F (^,� _j� "r� � �.�"til• % i �• _ 1741,8 ' r ��. i , .1 ,• 0.4 ' "ikil" '2: LIt ,1, • 10 PROJECT. Target PROJECT. Target 20745 Stevens-- • 20745 Stevens-- • Cupertino, CA 95014 Cupertino, CA 95014 1 20 21 1y 411. � �yj �lw "j r .�` j•i �.. y •. l� „�' lrY Wr:. .. .. �Y• t � '• r� rt. f,29 .t•� . ,. � _ _ �' t Q.. ��*�* ., L, Vii,' � Y.�,• il� �ii�. •�1�'4..., i.•�f �.' ,��F�r ��?t �Xy. �• -- -� •}• �� �...� t � '(.k..3,� - � � • 4 � +n`,�� , - t ,.v rix �� - ,i '� � • r. .: .�«]fir...:... �:.�+_ - �+1.--'�' � 26 - ' ilk rjr w•r 2• r,'{' � :� � 1 1 SLI n i .� '�'"�,� �� ,b' .yl'f�Y. .i '.L2 �� -� _ _ _ 1 �•. .i�l t fL•r".. f,•. .,' Al ' .r " F ' "�•L; ^ • , � �T"_ �{• a q• , TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley)))Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description UJG� 0 J U m� w Y OO O LLJ W VJ Z U U_ z O Z Z W >~ W W U U Lq� ti 0 N Project Number T-0323 Proto: Version: Config: Drawn By M. Morgan Checked By R. Kopff ARBORIST REPORT 0 PROJECT: Target 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd Cupertino, CA 95014 24, 43 • �i;`'� it irk PROJECT: Target 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd Cupertino, CA 95014 13 PROJECT. Target 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd Cupertino, CA 95014 Qualifications Ruben Green, president of Evergreen Arborists Consultants, Inc. has more than 33 years of experience in the landscape industry. His background includes hands-on experience in tree care, landscape maintenance, construction, and irrigation management. He has a Master's degree in plant science from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. He has provided detailed investigations, independent analysis and expert 12 witness testimony since 2003. He is a member of the American Society of Consulting Arborists (ASCA), a certified arborist and a certified tree risk assessor (TRAQ) with the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA), licensed pesticide applicator (QAL) with the state of California, and a (C-27) licensed California contractor. Assumptions and Limitations My field methods were evaluated with a 100 percent ground visual survey. No climbing, excavating, coring, boring, or drilling was performed. Trees that require additional inspection for risk and hazard evaluation will be billed under a separate proposal. Evergreen Arborists Consultants, Inc., and/or Ruben M. Green, or its employees, or related companies, makes no guaranties, express or implied to the health, risk, hazard, condition, potential for failure or future condition of the trees. Site inspections are limited to the date and time inspections occur. All inspections are visual ground inspections and are not considered as a thorough risk inspection. No root collar excavation was performed. Additional inspection(s) require a separate agreement between both parties in writing. Evergreen Arborists Consultants, Inc., and/or Ruben M. Green, or its employees shall not be liable to client/owner or any other party(s) for loss of property, loss of life, loss of use, loss of profits or income(s), special damages, incidental damages, consequential damages, or damages arising from the failure of inspection(s) or weather conditions. The client shall hold this arborist harmless against any and all claims for injuries to persons or property on the premises. Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near a tree is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risks is to eliminate all trees. TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley)))Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description �G\ LUG� 0 J U m� Y 0' O w o z vU �U)O Z W >~ Ww D �� U Lr)� ti 0 N Project Number T-0323 Proto: Version: Config: Drawn By M. Morgan Checked By R. Kopff ARBORIST REPORT Ll ■ 2 O WFC oAio�. a IIS Q SD SD SD © (A PUBLIC STREET) SD O SD iII 1 I --------------------------------------------------- 1 TREES 9 THROUGH 12 WERE I < I ° ° ° ° ORIGINALLY TAGGED FOR a Sl� I I REMOVAL, BUT SHALL ° REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE. ro 0 I I 10 11 12 I I I le o zz ILII 0 5A OI 9 0 no of O I o �I C o Ili ow ` II R • • O � 0 I 0 0 -� O O 8-- O O PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL, CIVIL O O DBH rr— O O O 9 0 no of O I o �I C o Ili ow ` II R • • O � 0 I 0 0 ® XR 43 EXISTING TREE / TO BE REPLACED — O O Date PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL, CIVIL O °0 O DBH 1 REMARKS//CONDITION IN—DECLINE OR DEAD. REFER TO TREE MITIGATION TABLE FOR MORE O O O O FOR LOCATION OF Alnus rhom bifolia CORRESPONDING REPLACEMENT 12" TREE. O O ° ° Remove and replace - In conflict with 2 0 0 O 12" El ° ° I ® I► ° Remove and replace - In conflict with 3 Jacaranda mimosifolia Jacaranda 14" 27'/28' I II I I �} I II L.J O O• © O O Ono I O� � i °H0�0�' I I 1 o —— — — —— — © ——- - — — — — — — — STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD — — — — — — — — — — (A PUBLIC STREET) - — — — — — — — — — - - -----� — ° __-------------- o — D — C ---- _, ------------ --- 0 SD C t4 25D. 8 PLANT SCHEDULE TREES CODE (QTY BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME CONT ® XR 43 EXISTING TREE / TO BE REPLACED — KEYPLAN EXISTING TREE IN CONFLICT WITH Date PROPOSED ARCHITECTURAL, CIVIL SCIENTIFIC NAME OR PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS, DBH OR DETERMINED TO BE REMARKS//CONDITION IN—DECLINE OR DEAD. REFER TO TREE MITIGATION TABLE FOR MORE INFORMATION. SEE PLANTING PLAN FOR LOCATION OF Alnus rhom bifolia CORRESPONDING REPLACEMENT 12" TREE. TREE DISPOSITION TABLE Kimley)))Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN OVERALL Date TREE NUMBER SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME DBH REMARKS//CONDITION HEIGHT/SPREAD/BTH 1 Alnus rhom bifolia White Alder 12" 20'/ 20' Remove and replace - Dead Remove and replace - In conflict with 2 Ceiba speciosa Floss Silk Tree 12" 20'/20' proposed ped improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 3 Jacaranda mimosifolia Jacaranda 14" 27'/28' proposed civil improvements 4" ea. Remove and replace - In conflict with 4 Acer palm atum Japanese Maple Trunk 101/10' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 5 Pyrus calleriana Flowering Pear 11" 25'/20' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 6 Pyrus calleriana Flowering Pear 13" 25'/30' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 7 Pyrus calleriana Flowering Pear 6" 19'/16' proposed civil improvements 8 Remove and replace - In conflict with F0 �G& Pyrus calleriana Flowering Pear 13" 25'/24' proposed civil improvements Contig: Drawn By M. Morgan Checked By R. Kopff TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN 0 Tree to remain, protect in place - Curb 9 Pyrus calleriana Flowering Pear 7" 16'/ 14' shall be reconstructed to save tree Tree to remain, protect in place - Curb 10 Pyrus calleriana Flowering Pear 5" 13'/ 10' shall be reconstructed to save tree Tree to remain, protect in place - Curb 11 Pyrus calleriana Flowering Pear 10" 16'/ 14' shall be reconstructed to save tree Tree to remain, protect in place - Curb 12 Pyrus calleriana Flowering Pear 9" 19'/ 14' shall be reconstructed to save tree Remove and replace - In conflict with 13 Pyrus kawakam ii Evergreen Pear 5" 19'/ 14' proposed civil im provem ents Remove and replace - In conflict with 14 Pyrus kawakam ii Evergreen Pear 5" 17'/ 10' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 15 Pyrus calleriana Flowering Pear 4" 20'/10' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 16 Pyrus calleriana Flowering Pear 2" 13'/4' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 17 Pyrus calleriana Flowering Pear 4" 12'/6' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - Poor health and in 18 Pyrus kawakam ii Evergreen Pear 4" 21'/14' conflictwith proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 19 Pyrus kawakam ii Evergreen Pear 8" 22'/ 18' proposed civil im provem ents Remove and replace - In conflict with 20 Pyrus kawakam ii Evergreen Pear 6" 21'/ 12' proposed civil im provements Remove and replace - In conflict with 21 Pyrus kawakam ii Evergreen Pear 7" 21'/ 16' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 22 Pyrus kawakam ii Evergreen Pear 6" 16'/ 12' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 23 Pyrus kawakam ii Evergreen Pear 6" 14'/ 12' proposed civil im provem ents Remove and replace - In conflict with 24 Pyrus kawakam ii Evergreen Pear 4" 13'/ 12' proposed civil im provements Remove and replace - In conflict with 25 Pyrus kawakam ii Evergreen Pear 5" 15'/ 12' proposed civil improvements 4" ea. Remove and replace - In conflict with 26 Acer palm atum Japanese Maple Trunk T/ 10' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 27 Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle 6" 10'/6' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 28 Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle 6" 14'/12' proposed civil improvements 3" ea. Remove and replace - In conflict with 29 Acer palm atum Japanese Maple Trunk 11' / 12' proposed civil improvements 4" ea. Remove and replace - In conflict with 30 Acer palm atum Japanese Maple Trunk 10'/ 16' proposed civil improvements 3" ea. Remove and replace - Fair health and in 31 Acer palm atum Japanese Maple Trunk 6'/10' conflictwith proposed civil improvements 2" ea. Remove and replace - In conflict with 32 Acer palm atum Japanese Maple Trunk 5'/8' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 33 Acer palm atum Japanese Maple 1" 6'/2' proposed civil improvements 3" ea. Remove and replace - In conflict with 34 Acer palm atum Japanese Maple Trunk 17'/ 16' proposed civil improvements 3" ea. Remove and replace - In conflict with 35 Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Trunk 14'/ 12' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 36 Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle 4" 14'/8' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 37 Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle 5" 17'/ 16' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 38 Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle 5" 16'/18' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 39 Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle - STUMP n/a n/a proposed civil improvements 3" ea. Remove and replace - In conflict with 40 Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Trunk 12'/14' proposed civil improvements 3" ea. Remove and replace - In conflict with 41 Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Trunk 11'/22' proposed civil improvements 3" ea. Rem ove and replace - In conflict with 42 Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Trunk 12'/12' proposed civil improvements 3" ea. Remove and replace - In conflict with 43 Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Trunk 11'/8' proposed civil improvements 3" ea. Remove and replace - In conflict with 44 Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Trunk 11'/8' proposed civil improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 45 Ceiba speciosa Floss Silk Tree 22" 20'/20' proposed ped improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 46 Jacaranda mimosifolia Jacaranda 20" 30'/30' proposed ped improvements Remove and replace - In conflict with 47 Prunus spp. Flowering Cherry 6" 101/10' proposed ped improvements JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT ALL TREES NOTED ON THIS PLAN ARE TO BE REMOVED DUE TO POOR HEALTH AND/OR CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. ALL TREES PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL WILL BE REPLACED ON A 1:1 BASIS. TREES THAT ARE DEEMED INAPPROPRIATE FOR REPLACEMENT IN-KIND, DUE TO CLIMATIC CONDITIONS OR WATER CONSERVATION PURPOSES SHALL BE REPLACED WITH AN ADAPTIVE, DROUGHT -TOLERANT SPECIES OF SIMILAR MATURE HEIGHT AND SPREAD, TO PROMOTE HEALTHIER AND ENDURING URBAN CANOPY AT THIS SITE. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 80 TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley)))Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description F0 �G& UJG� 0 J U m� OLO LwLJ 0) Z vU O z z z nw ; �+ W w D (/) ::) U Lq� O N Project Number T-0323 Proto: Version: Contig: Drawn By M. Morgan Checked By R. Kopff TREE MANAGEMENT PLAN 0 ONLY REMOVE REQUIRED FOF r'1/lTATr r1l IMM AIA/A\/ PLAN VIEW TREE DEMOLITION SEQUENCE: 1. PERFORM ANY ROOT PRUNING. 2. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING 3. CAREFULLY REMOVE SIDEWALK AND BASE MATERIAL, COORDINATE ALL DEMOLITION OPERATIONS AROUND PROTECTED TREES WITH ENGINEER AND PROJECT ARBORIST. NOTES: 1. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES, COORDINATE WITH OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 2. ALL TREE PROTECTION MEASURES MUST BE IN PLACE AND APPROVED BY OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES. FS 3. OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE TO APPROVE ANY CANOPY THINNING AND/OR CANOPY RAISING PRUNING TO ALLOW FOR DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SITE DEMOLITION AREA U C'. mi TREE PROTECTION AREA TREE PROTECTION FENCE, REF. DETAIL ON THIS SHEET ROOT PRUNING TRENCH (TYP) REF. TREE PROTECTION PLANS AND TREE PLANT SPECIFICATIONS -ECTED TREE ROOTS CURB AND SIDEWALK DEMOLITION W/ LANDSCAPE PROTECTION FENCE SEE DET. 1 THIS SHEET FOR TYPE co ROOTPRUNE SEE SECTION F _ 1'TYP. SEE PLAN 6"TYP. I k I/ A/ 0z O - U �w W LU LU U) TREE PROTECTION FENCE - CHAIN LINK RADIUS=1 FOOT PER INCH OF TRUCK DIAMETER TREE PROTECTION FENCE AULCH (20'-0" FOR 20" DIA. TREE) BUILDING WOOD CHIP MULCH AREA (4"-6" DEPTH) TREE PROTECTION FENCE (MODIFIED) - CHAIN I INK C)R C)RANrF SNOW FI AKF MFRH 10- MAX DRIPLINE (VARIES) FENCE LOCATION (LIMITS OF CRITICAL ROOT ZONE) RADIUS=1 FOOT PER INCH OF TRUCK DIAMETER C RZ OTECTION FENCE AT CRZ PROTECTIVE FENCING 5' *AS NEEDED TO PROVIDE NECESSARY WORK SPACE. IF LESS THAN 5', THEN ADD BOARDS STRAPPED TO TRUNK. TREE PROTECTION FENCING NTS TREE PROTECTION NOTES 1. THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE (TPZ) IS THE AREA AROUND A TREE OR GROUP OF TREES IN WHICH NO GRADING, EXCAVATION, STAGING, STORING OR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS TO OCCUR. 2. ANY TREE OR GROUP OF TREES IDENTIFIED AS "PROTECT IN PLACE" SHALL HAVE A TPZ ESTABLISHED AROUND THE INDIVIDUAL TREE OR GROUP OF TREES. 3. FOR THIS PROJECT THE TPZ SHALL BE DETERMINED BY ESTABLISHING AN AREA AROUND THE BASE OF THE TREE THAT IS EQUAL TO 2/3 THE AREA OF THE DRIPLINE. THE DRIPLINE IS THE AREA DEFINED BY THE OUTERMOST CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE TREE CANOPY WHERE WATER DRIPS FROM AND ONTO THE GROUND. 4. PROTECTIVE FENCING SHALL BE USED TO ESTABLISH A TPZ AROUND EACH TREE OR GROUP OF TREES PRIOR TO THE START OF DEMOLITION, CLEARING AND GRADING. A SIGN PI ANI WARNING PEOPLE TO STAY OUT OF THE TPZ SHALL BE AFFIXED ONTO THE FENCING. PROTECTION 5. ESTABLISH THE TPZ UTILIZING TREE PROTECTION FENCING (SEE DETAIL ON SHEET TD -1). FENCE SEE PLAN ROOTPRUNE TRENCH CUT 6. THE FENCE SHALL ENCLOSE THE TREE OR GROUP OF TREES AND REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL SEE PLAN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED OR PRIOR TO NEW LANDSCAPE & IRRIGATION EXISTING WORK IS TO COMMENCE IN THESE AREAS. GRADE ROOTS [:�I ROOT PRUNING SECTION 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION ADJACENT TO THE TPZ BY: • LIMITING TRAFFIC AND STORAGE AREAS • PROTECTING SOIL SURFACE WITH DEEP MULCH • MINIMIZING COMPACTION ON NON -LOAD BEARING AREAS • PROVIDING EXTRA REINFORCEMENT IN PAVING MATERIALS • AVOIDING USE OF HEAVY EQUIPMENT AROUND TREES. 8. MINIMIZE EXCAVATION ADJACENT TO THE TPZ: z MAINTAIN NATURAL GRADE AROUND THE TREE 7 • zo ROUTE UTILITIES AROUND TREES, BORE OR TUNNEL UTILITIES UNDER TREES, AND Ml COMBINE UTILITIES IN ONE TRENCH, WHERE POSSIBLE CLEAN CUT ALL ROOTS w/ LOPERS OR CHAINSAW ON SIDE NEAR TREE cPrTlnnl NTS SITE PREPARATION NOTES (20'-0" FOR 20" DIA. TREE) DRIPLINE 1. ALL TREES NOT SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE. 2. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND IDENTIFY TREES WHICH ARE TO BE PROTECTED AS WELL AS THOSE WHICH ARE TO BE REMOVED. DEMOLITION SHALL NOT COMMENCE WITHOUT A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF EXISTING CONDITIONS TO BE PRESERVED. 3. TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED BY THE INSTALLATION OF FENCING AT THE DRIPLINE OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER. FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. FENCING SHALL BE SUFFICIENT TO PREVENT CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT FROM COMPACTING SOIL AT THE ROOT ZONE AND DAMAGING TRUNKS AND BRANCHES. 4. IF, IN ORDER TO PERFORM EXCAVATION WORK, IT BECOMES NECESSARY TO CUT ROOTS OF PLANTS TO BE SAVED, SUCH ROOTS SHOULD BE CUT NEATLY, COVERED WITH BURLAP AND KEPT MOIST UNTIL ROOTS ARE BACK FILLED WITHIN 24 HOURS. 5. TREE REMOVAL SHALL INCLUDE THE FILLING, CUTTING, GRUBBING OUT OF ENTIRE ROOTBALLS AND SATISFACTORY OFF-SITE DISPOSAL OF ALL TREES, SHRUBS, STUMPS, VEGETATIVE AND EXTRANEOUS DEBRIS PRODUCED BY THE REMOVAL OPERATIONS. 6. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF WORK DUE TO HIS CONTRACT OPERATIONS. 7. ALL REFUSE, DEBRIS, UNSUITABLE MATERIALS AND MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE LEGALLY DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE BY CONTRACTOR. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE FIELD AND REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES IN THE SITE SURVEY TO THE OWNER OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley)))Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description `o x0\ �0 G Cp UJ 0 J U m� YCD LO 0 wM Z < C) �U)O zz_ W LU L ~ 0— WI-- w D ti O N Project Number T-0323 Proto: Version: Config: Drawn By M. Morgan Checked By R. Kopff TREE MANAGEMENT NOTES & DETAILS ■ w I Q rill. � r r LJ ElA II ' d01� w Q on. I p _ _ _ _ ALVES DRIVE (A PUBLIC STREET) _ SD SD SD (D ITpill 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o° O 0 0 0 0 mull Wim =H • mpp� pu MH • MU MA• �11111104 50 3 17 r� 7 32 31 19 17 I --F7 3 16 • SD SD -----------------� O O �sva����w���m�w��m•�®��®®arm®®���.e iR i Maw 0 • 0 00 0 LJ OO O 1 1 o O O 0 0 O I F .�, F� ° O ° 1® ®, O O O O O O I I I l i l I 0 ° 1 Pg 1 O 0 0 O O O O ° 1 OO O O O O I 0 0_0 I � F OS �� ° 1 P�� 1 U° ° o 0 0 ° _ 1 I° ° ' 0 1 O ° ° O ° O I L O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O OO O 0 O O l ° ° p O O O O ° O O O 1 O O O O O O O O ID° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° I �w 1 I O °r 0 O- O ° O 0. ° I O O O O O O O O O O I r 1 1O ° ° ° ° ° ° O ° ° I - '1O 0 x O o 1 I I O O O O O O O O I I U 1 1— © w a 1 I I 25 O O 0 O SEE ENLARGEMENT B, o 0 0 0 0 0 F © I o f I I 1 O O O SHEET L2.2 O O O O I ' a 1 I I Cl Q- I I I 4�_ 8 FdM CONCEPTUAL PLANTING SCHEDULE y— TREES QUANT. CONT. WUCOLS j EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN - PROTECT IN PLACE 41 - \\ TYP. SMALL ACCENT TREE SUCH AS: 23 24" BOX M CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS / WESTERN REDBUD, OR LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA X FAURIEI 'ACOMA' / ACOMA CRAPE MYRTLE, OR MAGNOLIA GRANDIFLORA'LITTLE GEM'/ LITTLE GEM SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA, OR VITEX TRIFOLIA'PURPUREA' / ARABIAN LILAC TYP. MEDIUM ACCENT TREE SUCH AS: 9 24" BOX L/M PYRUS CALLERYANA'AUTUMN BLAZE'/ AUTUMN BLAZE PEAR 5 36" BOX L/M TYP. BROAD CANOPY SHADE TREE SUCH AS: 18 24" BOX M JACARANDA MIMOSIFOLIA / JACARADA, OR PLATANUS RACEMOSA IN STORMWATER TREATMENT AREAS SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS WUCOLS SIZE SPACING TYP. PROPOSED SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA/ MANZAN ITA L 1 GAL 36" O.C. BERBERIS AQUIFOLIUM 'COMPACTA' / L 1 GAL 36" O.C. OREGON GRAPE HOLLY BOUTELOUA GRACILIS / BLUE GRAMMA L 1 GAL 30" O.C. CARPINTERIA CALIFORNICA L 5 GAL 48" O.C. CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM / DWARF CAPE RUSH L 5 GAL 36" O.C. DIANELLA REVOLUTA'LITTLE REV'/ LITTLE REV FLAX LILY L 1 GAL 12" O.C. DYMONDIA MARGARETAE / SILVER CARPET L 4" POT 6" O.C. HELICTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS / BLUE OAT GRASS L 5 GAL 24" O.C. DIETES GRANDIFLORA /WILD IRIS L 5 GAL 24" O.0 LIPPIA NODIFLORA / KURAPIA L 4" POT 6" O.C. LOMANDRA LONG IFLIA'BREEZE' / DWARF MAT RUSH L 1 GAL 30" O.C. MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS / MUHLY GRASS L 5 GAL 36" O.C. MYRTUS COMMUNIS 'COMPACTA' / DWARF MYRTLE L 1 GAL 24" O.C. PHORMIUM TENAX' RAINBOW MAIDEN'/ L 5 GAL 36" O.C. RAINBOW MAIDEN NEW ZEALAND FLAX ROSA'MEIZORLAND' / WHITE DRIFT ROSE M 1 GAL 30" O.C. RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA WOUND SAN BRUNO' / L 5 GAL 30" O.C. MOUND SAN BRUNO COFFEE BERRY WESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA'LOW HORIZON'/ L 5 GAL 36" O.C. LOW HORIZON COAST ROSEMARY STORMWATER TREATMENT WUCOLS TYP. PROPOSED STORMWATER TREATMENT PLANTINGS SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: r, r,rrrrrrr, r, rrr,r, r,rrr,r, CAREX TUMULICOLA / BERKELEY SEDGE L 1 GAL 12" O.C. rY r,r, r,rrr,r, rrr,r, r,rrr,r, rr r,r, r,rr r,r, rrr,r, r,rrr,r, rrr,r, r,rrr,r, JUNCUS PATENS /CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH L 1 GAL 24" O.C. rrr,r,rrrrr,r, rr r,r, r,rr r,r, rri,Y, r,rri,Y, MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS / DEER GRASS L 5 GAL 36" O.C. VINES WUCOLS D TYP. PROPOSED VINES FOR GREENSCREEN TRELLIS SYSTEM SHALL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: PARTHENOCISSUS TRI CUSPIDATA'VEITCH II' / BOSTON IVY M 15 GAL 48" O.C. TRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES / STAR JASMINE M 15 GAL 48" O.C. KEY NOTES \ EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO PUBLIC REQUIRED RIGHT—OF—WAY. KEYPLAN \ EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN WITH UPDATED PER MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE GRAPHICS. MINIMUM INTERIOR LANDSCAPING \ PROPOSED REMOVABLE BOLLARDS. O6 PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVERS. O7 PROPOSED STORE ENTRANCE. O8 PROPOSED LANDSCAPED ENTRANCE PLAZA. O9 PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO PUBLIC 19.124.040: ONE TREE PER FIVE RIGHT—OF—WAY. DECRETIVE CONCRETE. 16 PROPOSED GREEN SCREEN. 17 PROPOSED PLANTER (TYP). 19 PROPOSED BIKE RACKS. 21 PROPOSED SIDEWALK. 22 BIKE REPAIR STATION. 23 PROPOSED SPHERICAL BOLLARDS. 24 PROPOSED WASTE TRIO STATION AND TO PREVENT CONFLICT WITH VEHICLES CIGARETTE BUTT URN. 29 BIORETENTION AREA 30 PROPOSED CIGARETTE BUTT URN 31 5' WIDTH CONCRETE PAD FOR ACCESS AT ART EACH PARKING AISLE, AND ALL WALL TREE SWING 32 LOW 2" TO 6" HEIGHT MAXIMUM WIDTH BY THE LENGTH OF THE GROUNDCOVER PLANTINGS AS EXTENSION OF ART WALL FEATURE 33 CUSTOM SCULPTURAL ART BENCH CODE COMPLIANCE REQUIRED PROVIDED KEYPLAN TOTAL AREA OF PARKING LOT No. PER MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE SERVED BY PROPOSED MINIMUM INTERIOR LANDSCAPING 19.124.040: PARKING FACILITIES OVER IMPROVEMENTS: 69,000 SF 30,000 SF MUST PROVIDE 10% 69,000 X .10 = 6,900 LANDSCAPE AREA LANDSCAPE AREA PROVIDED: 6,900 SF PER MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE WHERE CIVIL IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRE PARKING LOT TREE CANOPY COVER/SPACING 19.124.040: ONE TREE PER FIVE ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING PARKING STALLS FOR EVERY TEN CONDITIONS, ONE TREE PER FIVE SPACES IN A ROW STALLS HAS BEEN PROVIDED PER MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE ALL LANDSCAPE PLANTER STRIPS LANDSCAPE PLANTER STRIPS 19.124.040: AT LEAST THREE WIDE BY WITHIN THE PARKING LOT MEET THE LENGTH OF THE PARKING STALL MINIMUM SIZE REQUIREMENTS PER MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE ALL PROPOSED TREES ARE OFFSET PLACEMENT OF TREES 19.124.040: TREES SHALL BE OFFSET TO PREVENT CONFLICT WITH TO PREVENT CONFLICT WITH VEHICLES VEHICLES PER MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE ALL PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLANTER 19.124.040: CURBED PLANTER STRIPS STRIPS WITHIN THE PARKING LOT SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE END OF MEET MINIMUM SIZE REQUIREMENTS. PLANTER STRIPS EACH PARKING AISLE, AND ALL CURBED PLANTER STRIPS ARE STRIPS SHALL BE THREE FEET IN LOCATED PER CODE AT THE END OF WIDTH BY THE LENGTH OF THE EACH AISLE ADJACENT PARKING STALL TWO MAIN PEDESTRIAN PATHS HAVE PER MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE BEEN ESTABLISHED AND IMPROVED 19.124.040: ADEQUATE PEDESTRIAN TO PROVIDE ENHANCED PAVING PEDESTRIAN PATHS PATHS SHALL BE PROVIDED CROSSINGS, AND VEGETATIVE THROUGHOUT THE PARKING BUFFER. ENLARGED LOT/LANDSCAPE AREAS PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE NODES WITH AMENITIES ARE LOCATED AT ROW PER MUNICIPAL CODE TABLE 19.124.040: TREES REQUIRED TO MEET ALL TREES PROPOSED ON—SITE ARE MINIMUM TREE SIZE CODE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF OFF 24" BOX MINIMUM 01 0\ �G\ GO JJ STREET PARKING SHALL BE A LU < J U m� _ Y O OLO L LI Z vU 0 ZZ LJ ;� LLI W U U �U O CV Project Number T-0323 MINIMUM OF 15 GALLON SIZE Version: Config: PER MUNCIPAL CODE: COMMERCIAL GROSS FLOOR AREA: 128,567 LANDSCAPE PLAN PROPERTIES OF 20,000 SF OR MORE 128,567 X .025 = 3214 SF COMMON OPEN SPACE MUST PROVIDE COMMON OPEN SPACE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 2.5% COMMON OPEN SPACE OF THE GROSS FLOOR AREA PROVIDED: 12,020 SF GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 80 (:i) TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley)))Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 01 0\ �G\ GO JJ LU < J U m� _ Y O OLO L LI Z vU 0 ZZ LJ ;� LLI W U U �U O CV Project Number T-0323 Proto: Version: Config: Drawn By M. Morgan Checked By R. Kopff LANDSCAPE PLAN ■ 6 \ 1�11�11�11�1��1��1�919�9��11�11�1 j I I I I I I R�I 6 osoa I I I 1 I al ■ Ir r■ a � F rl F A 1 I I I I I iA kpgpd n otP r, 0 EXISTING PLANTER/ PLANTING ISLAND TO REMAIN (TYP) © PROPOSED PLANTER W/ LOW WATER—USE, DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTINGS (TYP) © PROPOSED CAFE—STYLE SPILL—OVERS SEATING (TYP) O PROPOSED SMALL ORNAMENTAL TREE AT KEY PEDESTRIAN ENTRY POINTS (TYP) © PROPOSED SHADE TREE TO COMPLEMENT EXISTING PARKING LOT TREES (TYP) O PROPOSED RAISED PLANTER W/ INTEGRATED BENCH SEATING (TYP) O PROPOSED ENHANCED PLAZA PAVING (TYP) O PROPOSED BICYCLE PARKING (TYP) 0 PROPOSED DECORATIVE BOLLARD (TYP) �i PROPOSED TACTILE WARNING STRIP (TYP) NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 10 20 40 E TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 KimleylMorn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description GO W J U m� Yo w 'n Lu CD Z �Q U �? z O Q zz LLI w F: ww U L0 C) 0 N • Pmje Number T-0323 Pmfo_ Version: Config_ Drawn By M. Morgan Cheuketl By R. Kopff LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.1 CONCEPTUAL PLANT LIST CONCEPTUAL PLANT IMAGERY STORMWATER VEGETATED CA NATIVE DROUGHT SCVWD APPROVED TREATMENT BUFFER STRIP TOLERANT PLANT LIST TREES l rr CERCIS OCCIDENTALIS 1 WESTERN RED BUD X X X JACARANDA MIMOSIFOLIA 1 JACARADA X F:; ' �.,Y - �� TARGET® LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA X FAURIEI 'ACOMA' 1 ACOMA CRAPE MYRTLE X X ��'" 1000 NICOL LET MALL i MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 MAGNOLIA GRAND IFLORA'LITTLE GEM'/ LITTLE GEM SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA X - PLATANUS RAGEMOSA /CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE X X X X PYRUS CALLERYANA'AUTUMN BLAZE'/ AUTUMN BLAZE PEAR X X y SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS ' i ,. - Kimley*Horn ARCTOSTAPHYLOS DENSIFLORA 1 MANZANITA x x x x WESTERN RED BUD JACARANDA ACOMA CRAPE MYRTLE LITTLE GEM MAGNOLIA AUTUMN BLAZE PEAR ARABIAN LILAC OREGON GRAPE HOLLY BERBERIS AQUIFOLIUM 'COMPACTA' 1 OREGON GRAPE HOLLY X X X X 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, s` SUITE 250 BOUTELOUA GRACILIS 1 BLUE GRAMMA X X X X X SAN JOSE, CA 95113 CAREX TUMULICOLA I BERKELEY SEDGE X X X X X CARPINTERIA CALIFORNICA 1 BUSH ANEMONE X X X X . r4 �. �` .jr�►` l� J�, .} - CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM 1 DWARF CAPE RUSH X X X fi DIANELLA REVOLUTA'LITTLE REVI LITTLE REV FLAX LILY X X DIETES GRANDIFLORA /WILD IRIS X X X DYMONDIA MARGARETAE I SILVER CARPET X X � r HELIGTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS 1 BLUE OAT GRASS X X X KEYPLAN JUNCUS PATENS 1 CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH x x x x x BLUE GRAMMA BERKELEY SEDGE BUSH ANEMONE SMALL CAPE RUSH LITTLE REV FLAX LILY WILD IRIS BLUE OAT GRASS LIPPIA NODIFLORA I KURAPIA X X I� i Fl I, x`' Date No. Description L MANDRAL N IFLIA'BREEZE' DWARFMATR H X X X X �' I �, s. `I !•; x_:, '. O O G / US. c MUHLENBERGIA CAPILLARIS 1 MUHLY GRASS X X X X ;r I MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS 1 DEER GRASS X X X X X a i � { 'h 1mg d 1 MYRTUS COMMUNIS COMPACTA 1 DWARF MYRTLE X X X f I; �" �>. 1, `v , r v PHORMIUM TENAX' RAINBOW MAIDEN'/ RAINBOW MAIDEN NEW ZEALAND FLAX X X X x I ti ROSA'MEIZORLAND' 1 WHITE DRIFT ROSE X X I RHAMNUS CALIFORNICA WOUND SAN BRUNO'/ MOUND SAN BRUNO COFFEE BERRY X X X X WESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA'LOW HORIZON'/ LOW HORIZON COAST ROSEMARY X X X CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH DWARF MAT RUSH MUHLY GRASS DEER GRASS DWARF MYRTLE RAINBOW MAIDEN NZ FLAX WHITE DRIFT ROSE VINES PARTHENOCISSUS TRICUSPIDATA'VEITCHII'I BOSTON IVY X X Xawl 'w"`£►� �. 4 ekr 3 . �,'s.s =>a �Ii F; ns' i► r �. -+. - :f.-'...F\�rrx_ �'. v . t ..s a Kms• + _'. TRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES 1 STAR JASMINE X X �, 114 �� '� �' • ',r r1: a �. ^ �"a " t 3�°", :gig, a _,s� iy.. , I•�'.; �' - 'F.- �, _ 4 N Y MANZANITA MOUND S. BRUNO COFFEE BERRY LOW HORIZON COAST ROSEMARY BOSTON IVY STAR JASMINE y y ENLARGEMENT KEY NOTES zz 17 17 24 O1 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION Q TO PUBLIC RIGHT—OF—WAY. w\O\ G STATE OF CA PRELIMINARY ESTIMATED WATER USE 0 PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVERS. 0 0- O TOTAL WATER USE IS CALCULATED BY SUMMING THE AMOUNT OF WATER 33 33 0 0 0 O PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN C' ESTIMATED FOR EACH HYDROZONE. WATER USE FOR EACH HYDROZONE -' 17 Y - CONNECTION TO PUBLIC IS ESTIMATED WITH THE FOLLOWING FORMULA: RIGHT—OF—WAY. DECRETIVE - 24 - - �- CONCRETE. EWU (HYDROZONE) = ESTIMATED WATER USE (GAL 1 YEAR)- ETO = REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION {INCHES /YEAR) - - - 17 PROPOSED PLANTER (TYP). PF = PLANT ETO ADJUSTMENT FACTOR PROPOSED SIDEWALK. HA = HYDROZONE AREA (S.F.) (BUBBLER HA = 16 S.F. 1 TREE) - Y - i .62 = CONVERSION FACTOR IE = IRRIGATION EFFICIENCY - 22 BIKE REPAIR STATION. SLA = SPECIAL LANDSCAPE AREA (S.F.) UJ PROPOSED WASTE TRIO STATION Q J EWU (HYRDROZONE) _ (ETO * PF HA 62) I (IE) I - - ' AND CIGARETTE BUTT URN. 00 yo HYDROZONE A (DRIP) - 31 PROPOSED BACKLESS BENCH WITH LU LO DIVIDERS. W � ' 1 Q CONVERSION EWU - f - - L - 33 CUSTOM SCULPTURAL ART BENCH Z ETO PF HA IE FACTOR GAL/YEAR 6 O O 21 0 - (!? O 43 .3 12,100 .81 .62 119,476 I - - - z Z 0 I o � 1 ___ --- W � — HYDROZONE B (BUBBLER) wW CONVERSION EWU ETO PF HA IE FACTOR GAL/YEAR *A L V LJ 43 .5 848 .81 .62 13,955 — 31 Q ~0 A, ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (ETWU) 133,431 I 17 — Q z1 Q N MAWA (MAXIMUM APPLIED WATER ALLOWANCE)T1 T T1 ET CONVERSION - f - - ETO ADJUSTMENT TOTAL HA FACTOR MAWA FACTOR J - - • - - - - ' - - - °T-0323 43 0.45 12,948 fit 213,404 - ' - - _ Project Number _ _ f Proto: Version: Config: ESTIMATED ANNUAL WATER USE (% OF MAWA) 63% r Drawn By M. Morgan Checked By R. Kopff ENLARGEMENT A - PEDESTRIAN NODE ENLARGEMENT B - PEDESTRIAN NODE PLAN NTS PLAN NTS LANDSCAPE NOTES ■ C•1 EO 0 me • ULEV. )U] ®m_lx� a � dOIS U AT DRIVE (A PUBLIC STREET) - 20745 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD ONE STORY BUILDING 35.1' - BUILDING HEIGHT 128,567 ± SQ. FT. (PER EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS) PARCEL ONE PARCEL 1 (613 M 7&8) 8.258 ± ACRES rs�A��11I•�il�,� �e V1 ,�� • • • — 0 0 0 o o O O C ° ° ° ° C 0 0 —� C 0 ° ° 1 ° C C 0O O O C o C� 0 01 � o ONSITE BIKE CIRCULATION ° ° 0 KEYPLAN o ► O O o 1/03/18 BIKE PARKING 00 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 0 0 � C O O O O 0 LANDSCAPE BIORETENTION AREA =0 ENHANCED PAVING TOTAL BIKE PARKING -T o�n� IQ= o 0 1 0 o 0 o o ° ° 0 2 SECURE BIKE PARKING x WOME OF M/w-M., 1 I I I I �JI O P RCEL THRI RIGHTS & EASEMENTS OVER PARCEL 3 (L329 O.R. 1699) I �Oii 8 BIKE PARKING " o o � � o� °� O� 1 A I 0 o� •a ••� - - � T � T T T — T ��— 7 I — — — — — — — - — — — — - - — — — — — ——STEVENS CREEIC-BOULEVARD — — — — — — — — - - (A PUBLIC STREET) X e x� --�— --- -- 1� 7 r~ dOIS a a J�L�9LUJ ' �r I LEGEND —*— ONSITE BIKE CIRCULATION OBUS STOP KEYPLAN STORE ENTRANCE ► EMPLOYEE ENTRANCE 1/03/18 BIKE PARKING 3/23/18 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6/20/18 ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVERS TRUNCATED DOMES LANDSCAPE BIORETENTION AREA ENHANCED PAVING TOTAL BIKE PARKING REQUIRED: 26 (1 SPACE PER 5,000 SF OF BUILDING) PROVIDED: 26 SHORT TERM PARKING 2 SECURE PARKING 28 TOTAL GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 # # # 11 0 ) TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley*Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 1/03/18 Entitlements Submittal 1 3/23/18 Entitlements Submittal 2 6/20/18 Entitlements Submittal 3 LU J U m� Y O OLL] L0 LLl 0') Z VU �Cn O zz_ W i~ LL1 LIJ U� U Lp� O N Project Number T-0323 Proto: Version: Config: Designed By J. Kirby Checked By M. Johnson BIKE CIRCULATION PLAN 0 ALV DRIVE (A PUBLIC STREET) _ 71a1!lSl�IiiI�I�I01�I0101�i 0 o O O O O O O 1 A- 44 i 20745 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD ° o O O ONE STORY BUILDING O o ° 35.1' - BUILDING HEIGHT 128,567 ± SQ. FT. 0 0 (PER EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS) O ° PARCEL ONE PARCEL 1 • (613 M 7&8) 8.258 ± ACRES 0 .O 00 00 f 00 u of H1111 !-Itl O �/ QQQ' CrIQQ' �QQ. %///,1 ULEV. )U] V-01-1114 ® xmm� I I *-**-** ..O O ivr O �y O �/ O O d� 1�I 101111 � O� O� • • < FIX FUN ----------".�� ——STEVENS CREEK -BOULEVARD — — — — — — — — - - (A PUBLIC S-TREET)- ---- ------ Xx --�— --- -- x r� PARCEL THRI RIGHTS & EASEMENTS OVER PARCEL 3 (L329 O.R. 1699) �oi �1W if MIM LEGEND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION OBUS STOP Kimley*Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 STORE ENTRANCE KEYPLAN Date No. EMPLOYEE ENTRANCE 1/03/18 OPEN SPACE AREA (SEE L2.0 FOR CALCULATIONS) 3/23/18 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6/20/18 ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVERS TRUNCATED DOMES LANDSCAPE BIORETENTION AREA ENHANCED PAVING GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 # # # TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley*Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 1/03/18 Entitlements Submittal 1 3/23/18 Entitlements Submittal 2 6/20/18 Entitlements Submittal 3 LU J U m� Yo 0 w� Z VU �U)o z w ;� LLI LIJ U� U Lp� O N Project Number T-0323 Proto: Version: Contig: Designed By J. Kirby Checked By M. Johnson PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PLAN 0 U im 0 0 i 1 1 1 rr I � ,y I ' • r. • EVERYDAY TRIP • SERVICE 1/03/18 ■.II OBUS STOP 6/20/18 Entitlements Submittal 3 ► > STORE ENTRANCE EMPLOYEE ENTRANCE • � -� F 20745 P L • AI PREORDER PICKUP • FAMILY TRIP • al EVERYDAY TRIP • SERVICE 1/03/18 • OBUS STOP 6/20/18 Entitlements Submittal 3 ► > STORE ENTRANCE EMPLOYEE ENTRANCE • � 7 \ pp 11 • / -11_11 b• M� • J ■ ■ ULEV. )U] J i r ■ 1 It"i 1111 110,14 Me V1 .. a � dOIS � AT DRIVE (A PUBLIC STREET) 20745 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD ONE STORY BUILDING 35.1' - BUILDING HEIGHT 128,567 ± SQ. FT. (PER EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS) PARCEL ONE PARCEL 1 (613 M 7&8) 8.258 ± ACRES PREORDER PICK UP DRIVETHRU PREORDER PC PICK UP I 7 • • i P RCEL THRI RIGHTS & EASEMENTS OVER PARCEL 3 (L329 O.R. 1699) 0 ® I C7 LEGEND PREORDER PICKUP Kimley*Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 FAMILY TRIP KEYPLAN EVERYDAY TRIP Date No. SERVICE 1/03/18 • OBUS STOP 6/20/18 Entitlements Submittal 3 ► > STORE ENTRANCE EMPLOYEE ENTRANCE i r ■ 1 It"i 1111 110,14 Me V1 .. a � dOIS � AT DRIVE (A PUBLIC STREET) 20745 STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD ONE STORY BUILDING 35.1' - BUILDING HEIGHT 128,567 ± SQ. FT. (PER EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS) PARCEL ONE PARCEL 1 (613 M 7&8) 8.258 ± ACRES PREORDER PICK UP DRIVETHRU PREORDER PC PICK UP I 7 • • i P RCEL THRI RIGHTS & EASEMENTS OVER PARCEL 3 (L329 O.R. 1699) 0 ® I C7 LEGEND GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 PREORDER PICKUP Kimley*Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 FAMILY TRIP KEYPLAN EVERYDAY TRIP Date No. SERVICE 1/03/18 NEIGHBORHOOD CIRCULATION OBUS STOP 6/20/18 Entitlements Submittal 3 ► > STORE ENTRANCE EMPLOYEE ENTRANCE GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET TARGET® 1000 NICOLLET MALL MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 Kimley*Horn 100 WEST SAN FERNANDO STREET, SUITE 250 SAN JOSE, CA 95113 KEYPLAN Date No. Description 1/03/18 Entitlements Submittal 1 3/23/18 Entitlements Submittal 2 6/20/18 Entitlements Submittal 3 UJ0 J U co I - (ID �o O w0') Z V < zz UJ ; LP - T#323 CUPERT 103 THIS FILE CONTAINS FAMILIES, MODEL ITEMS, DETAIL ITEMS, AND SCHEDULE INFORMATION. THE ELEMENTS IN THIS FILE ARE TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE CEILING AND ELECTRICAL PLANS PRODUCED BY THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER. HARD COPY AND ELECTRONIC PRINTS OF THIS FILE ARE NOT TO BE ISSUED AS CONSTRCUTION DOCUMENTS. thee Hghthg practice Project Name: T-0323 CUPERTINO INO Sheet Title: LP -103 SITE LIGHTING Project No.: 17091.0323 Scale: 1 if= 30' 0" SITE Date: 3/23/2018 I Target T0323 Cupertino Remodel Project Scope The Cupertino Target remodel is a complete refresh of the existing retail store at 20745 Stevens Creek Boulevard. It will include work at the building interior, exterior and site related improvements. This remodel is at the forefront of a Target initiative to provide the retail guest with the latest innovations and trends for merchandise presentation and delivery. Prior Planning Approval TR -2016-38, A8A-2016-07 In an ever-changing competitive retail landscape, Target is always looking for separators and betterways to provide guests with the best shopping experience. As part of this effort, the Cupertino store was originally redesigned around a test program looking at different exterior and interior designs that signal to guests there is something new and bold going on inside with merchandise innovations. A planning application package was approved by the Planning Commission on 9/26/2016. More recently, these specific test designs and certain scope elements have been cancelled and replaced by a more uniform National Remodel Program. After field testing different models and scopes around the country to understand what works and provides the most value, Target has set upon a more refined scope of work across all stores to maintain a level of brand consistency. Nevertheless, the Cupertino Target store is an important location that warrants unique features commensurate with the community it serves. As such, Target plans to provide enhancements as described in the following narrative. Proposed Designs Site workatthe propertyedges will include enhanced sidewalk paving along Stevens Creekand Saich Way with the existing bus shelter integrated into the new design. Landscaping throughout the site will be evaluated and replaced, if in poor condition. The parking lot paving will be cleaned and re -striped. New EV parking stalls will also be added to the parking field in the west lot. The existing monument sign along Stevens Creek will be refaced with Target's latest brand design. The building exterior will be redesigned with particular emphasis on the entry experience. There will be multiple entries for guest convenience located on 3 sides of the building and a fourth access point for merchandise delivery to the car. The existing primary entry at the south elevation will be removed and a new modern wing -like canopy added to the southwest corner with guest entries below the canopy on both the south and west sides of the building. In front of the west entrythere will be a landscaped plaza that will have seating for Starbucks patrons and guests to relax and provide a break from shopping. The proposed canopy bisects the facade at a dynamic angle that visually lifts and emphasizes the corner approach to the store. The same angled detail traces continuously along the major building facades, reinforcing the entry statement and visually breaking up the long perimeter walls. There will be a convenience entry on the east side of the building for guests to walk into the store to pick up orders made previously online. This entry has an interior link to a pickup door at the southeast building corner, where there will be a pull off lane cut into the sidewalk, allowing guests to have merchandise delivered directly to the car. All the entries will be characterized by wood like finishes and increased glazing for visibility into the store. Public art is prominently located at the corner adjacent to the entries facing the west and south parking fields. The art will wrapthe corner and be a welcome visual feature for guests as they pass by. The redesign of the south building elevation will be characterized by increased glazing facing Stevens Creek Boulevard for greater transparency and a more inviting appearance. Exterior materials will include wood like phenolic cladding, painted stucco and the metal canopy. New bullseye signs will be located on 3 facades at the building entry points. Landscaping will punctuate the front facade along the length of the building, integrated into the sidewalk paving. The north building elevation facing Alves Drive will also be redesigned to soften the building appearance by adding green screen with vines and landscaping. It will provide a calmer view for the residents across the street. The overall impression of the remodel design will be of a modern building with a warm and appealing presence through the use of exterior finishes and landscaping. It will be more open to Stevens Creek and encourage guests to arrive to the store via walking and biking, connecting via pedestrian paths from the public right of way, while continuing to accommodate auto traffic. It will remain as a strong retail partner along Stevens Creek Boulevard to complement the new breadth of commercial, office and residential development in the City of Cupertino. STUDIOS architecture March 5, 2018 Target Cupertino Store Remodel Comments to Resubmittal Plans dated 1/22/2018 Stevens Creek Blvd. (Between Saich Way and Bandley Drive) Cupertino, CA David Sabalvaro, AIA LEED AP Principal STUDIOS Architecture 405 Howard Street, Suite 488 San Francisco, CA 94105 415 398 7575 415 398 3829 fax www.studiosarclutecture.com Site Plan/Landscape/Site Furnishings Visual and Physical Connections from neighboring streets should be an important aspect of this project per the City of Cupertino's "Heart of the City Specific Plan" The previous Target Remodel submittal created new, enhanced connections from Saich Way, Stevens Creek Boulevard and Bandley Drive. There is no direct Pedestrian Connection illustrated from Alves Drive and the neighboring residential neighborhood. The Applicant should address how they might accommodate a connection from that area. The Pedestrian Connections from Saich Way, Stevens Creek Blvd and Bandley Drive are illustrated as painted diagonal striping from the public sidewalks. In addition, to meeting ADA requirements, enhanced material paving should be utilized, such as pavers, colored, scored concrete, etc. along with new landscaping and new trees to accentuate the pedestrian experience through the parking areas. At the streets, enhanced features in the paving, furnishings, etc. should create marked "portals" for entry to these enhanced walk ways. Bicycle racks, benches, etc. appear to be included in the Entry Plaza but should be added at termination points of these enhanced walk ways. The Entry Plaza indicates enhanced paving and some movable table and chair furnishings. Additional tables and chairs should be added or distributed further at the Entry Plaza outside of the primary circulation paths to main entries. Tables and chairs are only located in one area in this submittal. The planters and integral benches are good but primarily located in one area so additional movable furnishings should be added to fully activate the Entry Plaza It does not appear that a new planting islands or additional trees are being planned in this submittal. Additionally, "pervious asphalt" parking areas had been planned in the previous application. The Applicant should address how the existing parking areas are enhanced or treated. Will the City of Cupertino's tree shading canopy requirement be met? Target Cupertino Store Remodel Resubmittal Comments March 5, 2018 2 Since the building is such a long distance from the adjacent streets, there should be some additional effort in enhancing the pedestrian and bicyclist experience through additional public art pieces along with new landscape elements. The landscaped area along Stevens Creek Boulevard along with the improvements to the sidewalk and curbs should be illustrated with more detail and material call -outs. This is a "primary door" to the projects and should promote that entry and integrate the existing Bus Shelter with other enhanced furnishings and finishes. Lighting at Entry Plaza should be more clearly defined. Site Pan/Diagrams should clearly illustrate new proposed site furnishings. Elevations The proposed elevations illustrated reasonable treatments to mitigate the "big stucco box" appearance. Applicant should continue use of the "Horizontal Wood Board -Dark" or the "Red Stained Wood" below the sloping metal trip canopy line. The "gaps" where the wood board has not been applied below the sloped metal trim, should be completed with Wood Board siding. The proportions of stucco to enhanced materials should be better balanced. Additional Art areas/color, etc. should be considered at "rear" side along Alves Drive between Green Wall screens. The painted stucco walls at the Northwest and Northeast service and trash enclosure areas should be painted a different - but darker color to differentiate those blank corners of the building. The large, light colored stucco walls will be susceptible to wear and neglect. These simple comments are intended to enhance all elevations of the existing stucco box. End of comments creative Cupertino Local Artist Mural April 9, 2018 All information contained is strictly confidential. Mural and Sculpture Moment Locations PAR CELI 8.2581 ACRES STEVENS CREEK BLVD 0 pO I I I I � PARCEL 0.820t AGR 20755 STEVENS CR K BLVD I 2. ' I STEVENS C t EK B. LEVARD- Sculpture Mural Cupertino I Local Artist Mural (j)creative 2/5 I � I (H) 19 I / / I / v�6 t o I ,;II L. II� ) t f p�I t ARCEL3 .9811 ACRES 2073 TEVENS CREEK BLVD I j I I QJ m \ Cupertino I Local Artist Mural (j)creative 2/5 About the Artist Michael Bartalos has worked extensively in the graphic arts in the U.S., Europe and Japan. His illustration commissions include Swatch watches, stamps for the U.S. Postal Service, and merchandise and display graphics for the California Academy of Sciences. He has partnered with Target over several years in designing numerous gift cards and a variety of marketing collateral. Bartalos also produces limited print editions and sculptures, and worked with the San Francisco Arts Commission to create "Mission Parade," a permanent public artwork in the form of a decorative fence surrounding San Francisco's Mission Playground. He has recently been a grantee of the National Science Foundation's Antarctic Artists and Writers Program, a Stanford Fellow at SOMA Summer in Mexico City, and a Graduate Fellow at the Headlands Center for the Arts in Sausalito. Bartalos attended the School of the Art Institute of Chicago, Pratt Institute (BFA), and Stanford University (MFA). He has lived in the Bay Area for 22 years, currently works out of Menlo Park, and is Adjunct Professor of Graduate Design at the California College of the Arts in San Francisco. In addition to making art and teaching, he enjoys biking, running, and traveling with his wife and two sons. His work is online at http://bartalosillustration.com. Cupertino I Local Artist Mural (j)creative 3 Michael Bartalos Art Examples X J Cupertino I Local Artist Mural (j)creative 4 Thank you CUPERTINO MURAL: TREE TOWN NARRATIVE Michael Bartalos 1 2018 May 21 Page 1 Cupertino has an abundance of parks, plants, and wildlife. This mural, titled Tree Town, celebrates the natural scenery in and around the city by prominently featuring its trees. As such, it also references Cupertino's early history in fruit agriculture. The mural's plants and landmarks are labeled on page 3. Many of the trees and cactii will be embellished with line textures to resemble maps and mazes, inviting passersby in for a closer look to discover more detail. Another interactive aspect is the mural's hanging "swing,' a stationary bench protruding from the art wall amidst the greenery for visitors to find fun photo -ops in. Tree Town also represents the wide variety of animals that populate Cupertino's parks and gardens. They range from mammals and birds to reptiles and amphibians as labeled on page 4. The animals are shown to be diverse, abundant, interdependent on each other, and central to Cupertino's environment. In the background between the trees, visitors will find manmade landmarks and points of interest that further identify the location uniquely as Cupertino. These include De Anza College, Memorial Park, Cali Mill Plaza, and City Hall's morlon sculpture, among others. CUPERTINO MURAL: TREE TOWN Exterior Wall Mural Elevation Michael Bartalos 1 2018 May 21 Page 2 WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION << >> SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION ART WALL 3: West Cupertino i �— ART WALL 2: Central Cupertino ART WALL 1: East Cupertino CUPERTINO MURAL: TREE TOWN Exterior Wall Mural Elevation Michael Bartalos 1 2018 May 21 Page 3 PLANTS AND LANDMARKS LABELED WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION << >> SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION ART WALL 3: West Cupertino �-- ART WALL 2: Central Cupertino ART WALL 1: East Cupertino CUPERTINO MURAL- TREE TOWN Exterior Wall Mural Elevation Michael Bartalos 1 2018 May 21 4 ANIMALS LABELED 1 Bullseye WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION << >> SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION Jay M S". �Cerlar Waxwing California Quail California Mouse California Kinganake Amerinn Rodn Grantfailed!Grackle ART WALL 3: West Cupertino Chestnut-bal Chir, Robin Al GOIbLnch Amerinn Rodn RllersJay Chestnut-bal Chir, SteanJaySon Spanmy LLLn Lesser Gobi nch Norlhem Racmon Sae Arh Qyes White Pekin duckling Amebeen BWlfmg California Mouse Cheshire Cat House Finch American Robin Acorn winea ecker Black Phoebe Fox Squinel MArerl Coruna Black Phoebe Stator's Jay Millibar flock WesRm Pond Turtle ART WALL 2: Central Cupertino ART WALL 1: East Cupertino CUPERTINO MURAL: TREE TOWN Exterior Wall Mural Perspective Michael Bartalos 1 2018 May 21 Page 5 r V SII •� �• CUPERTINO SCULPTURAL SEATING: TREE TOWN NARRATIVE Michael Bartalos 1 2018 May 21 The Tree Town mural is complemented by outdoor sculptural seating. A live tree with a birdhouse serves as the seating unit's centerpiece, referencing the imagery on the nearby art walls and taking the tree theme into a three-dimensional interactive realm. The tree provides shoppers with a shady respite and a touch of nature on Cupertino's busiest thoroughfare. The surface colors of the seating unit echoes those of the mural and has designs etched into them that play off the mural graphics. The structural core of the unit will likely be steel and the surface material will either match or mimic the art wall's surface material for continuity. CUPERTINO SCULPTURAL SEATING: TREE TOWN CONCEPT Michael Bartalos 1 2018 May 21 Page 7 T3224 Cupertino Art Bench Dimensions 4" 7'-4" 35.25" 16.75" 16" 18.5" 4" 12.75" 0-F (17 M u HIXA60N TRANSPORTATION (ONSULTANTS, IN(. Memorandum Date: August 15, 2016 To: Ms. Catarina Kidd, City of Cupertino From: Brian Jackson Subject: Parking Study for the Target Store at 20745 Stevens Creek Blvd in Cupertino, CA Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc., has completed a parking study at the Target retail store located at 20745 Stevens Creek Boulevard in Cupertino, California. Figure 1 shows the Target store location. Target is proposing to introduce a new curbside order pick-up service and must reduce their parking supply in order to successfully implement the proposed service. Target also plans to decrease the retail sales floor area of their store and replace the sales area with a stockroom area to store curbside orders prior to pick-up. The new service would allow Target customers to order by using an app and pick up their order at a designated curbside parking area located adjacent to the building. Since Target employees would hand deliver the orders to the customers in parked vehicles, Target anticipates a high turnover of these curbside parking spaces. Therefore, with the proposed curbside service it is anticipated that fewer spaces within the existing parking lot would be required to serve customers. The purpose of the parking study was to: 1) Determine whether the existing on-site parking supply is currently sufficient to meet the existing parking demand of Target; 2) Calculate the parking reduction that would occur within the shopping center parking lot due to implementation of the proposed changes to the parking lot; and 3) Determine if adequate parking would be provided with implementation of the proposed curbside service. Parking Occupancy Counts Manual parking occupancy counts were conducted at the Cupertino Target location on two Saturdays: June 18th and June 25th. Counts of occupied parking spaces were taken every 30 minutes from 1:00 PM to 5:00 PM on both days to measure the number of parked vehicles within the Target parking lot. The survey time period was such that it captured the peak parking demand of the Target shopping center. The entire shopping center parking lot was surveyed, including the parking spaces located adjacent to the outparcel building located on the northwest corner of Bandley Drive and Stevens Creek Boulevard, since all of the parking spaces within the shopping center are shared between Target and the businesses that occupy the outparcel building. Table 1 and Figure 2 show the existing peak parking demand on Saturday June 18th, and Table 2 and Figure 3 show the existing peak parking demand on Saturday June 25th. As shown in the tables and figures, Target currently has more than adequate parking to serve its customers. In fact, based on the count data only 60 percent of the 616 -space shopping center parking lot was occupied during the busiest time of the day on both Saturdays. 4 North Second Street, Suite 400 -San Jose, California 95113 • phone 408.971.6100 • fax 408.971.6102 • www.hextrans.com z1a-k Cir rn Alves -pr- _ CD --- - Q k. 4' .... — ` _ -- _ - - --_ ---- - Stevens Greek Slid 10 Clf Ti • - a � CII C I CD Parking Study for the Target Store in Cupertino, CA Table 1 Parking Count — Saturday June 18' 1:00 PM 616 302 49% 314 1:30 PM 616 335 54% 281 2:00 PM 616 321 52% 295 2:30 PM 616 332 54% 284 3:00 PM 616 348 56% 268 3:30 PM 616 364 59% 252 4:00 PM 616 321 52% 295 4:30 PM 616 312 51% 304 5:00 PM 616 308 50% 308 Figure 2 varKina count — saturaav June 18 „ Parking on SaturdayJune 18th 700 600 v 500 U M ,C- 400 Total E 300 Parking Y Spaces L a 200 Spaces 100 Occupied 0 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM Time of Day H RMON August 15, 2016 Page 13 Parking Study for the Target Store in Cupertino, CA Table 2 Parking Count — Saturday June 25th 1:00 PM 616 327 53% 289 1:30 PM 616 333 54% 283 2:00 PM 616 321 52% 295 2:30 PM 616 340 55% 276 3:00 PM 616 352 57% 264 3:30 PM 616 367 60% 249 4:00 PM 616 328 53% 288 4:30 PM 616 338 55% 278 5:00 PM 616 322 52% 294 Figure 3 �4h i&I9 A I IL IM-61ql 10 C VlF1! 11 [wW4430 Parking on SaturdayJune 25th 700 600 v 500 u 400 Total 300 Parking Y Spaces L a 200 Spaces 100 Occupied 0 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM Time of Day H RMON August 15, 2016 Page 14 Parking Study for the Target Store in Cupertino, CA Planned Parking Reduction August 15, 2016 Based on the parking plan provided, Target plans to reduce their current parking supply from 616 parking spaces to 510 parking spaces, not including the short-term parking spaces associated with the proposed curbside service. This equates to 106 parking spaces that would be removed from the existing shopping center parking lot in order to implement the curbside service. As shown in Table 3 and Figure 4, adequate parking would continue to be provided at the Cupertino Target store with implementation of the curbside service. Figure 5 shows the proposed parking plan. Table 3 Future Saturday Parking Conditions 1:00 PM 510 321 63% 189 1:30 PM 510 334 65% 176 2:00 PM 510 321 63% 189 2:30 PM 510 338 66% 172 3:00 PM 510 351 69% 159 3:30 PM 510 367 72% 143 4:00 PM 510 327 64% 183 4:30 PM 510 332 65% 178 5:00 PM 510 319 63% 191 Figure 4 Future saturaav rarKina Conditions Saturday Parking With New Curbside Service 600 500 Ln u 400 M Q- Total 300 Parking "M 200 Spaces a Spaces 100 Occupied 0 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00 3:30 4:00 4:30 5:00 PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM Time of Day HHOON Page 15 Parking Study for the Target Store in Cupertino, CA ALVES DRIVE (60' RJW) .. PEXA60N EXISTING BUILDING a �.l r Q--7717 G 11 ----- STEVENS CREEK BOULEVARD (90' RIW) i Figure 5 Parking Plan NORTH Nmms— Parking Study for the Target Store in Cupertino, CA Conclusions August 15, 2016 Based on the results of the parking study, the Target store in Cupertino currently provides adequate parking to serve existing customers during the peak period of parking demand on Saturdays, and would continue to provide adequate parking with implementation of the planned curbside service. `. PRA OM Page 17