Report Cover, TOC, GlossaryPUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT
APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2011082055
June 2013
OFFICE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
(408) 777-3308 • FAX (408) 777-3333
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF A
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND PUBLIC HEARING
FOR THE APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT
State Clearinghouse #: 2011082055
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Cupertino, as Lead Agency, has completed a Draft
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Apple Campus 2 Project (project). The proposed project is the
development of a new corporate campus on an approximately 176 -acre site in the City of Cupertino.
PUBLIC MEETING: A public meeting to receive comments on the Draft EIR will be held on June 26,
2013, at 6:30 p.m. at Community Hall, located at 10350 Torre Avenue (next to the Cupertino Library).
Please check the project website at: www.cupertino.org/applecampus2 or call (408) 777-3308 prior to the
meeting for updated information in the event of changes. You may also sign up at the website to receive
project updates.
PUBLIC REVIEW TIMELINE: The public review period for the Draft EIR begins June 6, 2013 and ends
July 22, 2013 at 5:30 p.m. PST. Responses to all written comments regarding the adequacy of the Draft
EIR received during the public review period will be provided in the Final EIR expected to be published
later in 2013.
SUBMITTING COMMENTS: Written comments may be submitted in one of the following ways:
1. Electronically: You are encouraged to use the online comment format
www.cupertino.org/applecampus2.
2. In-person or by mail: 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014
3. Email: applecampus2p_cupertino.org
4. Fax: (408) 777-3333.
Direct all comments to the attention of: The Department of Community Development, Re: Apple Campus
2.
DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY: The Draft EIR is available at: www.cupertino.org/applecampus2.
Copies of the Draft EIR are also available for review Monday through Thursday, between the hours of
7:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. and Friday, between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., at the City of
Cupertino City Hall, Main Lobby and the downstairs Lobby, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California
95014, except on specified holidays. Copies of the Draft EIR in paper or electronic format may be
purchased at the Cupertino City Hall. The Draft EIR is also available for review at:
• Cupertino Library, 10800 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, CA 95014
• Sunnyvale Library, 665 W. Olive Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94086
• Central Park Library, 2635 Homestead Road, Santa Clara, CA 95051
• Mission Library, 1098 Lexington Street in Santa Clara, CA 95050
• Saratoga Library, 13650 Saratoga Avenue, Saratoga, CA 95070
• Los Altos Library, 13 S. San Antonio Road, Los Altos, CA 94024
• Woodland Library, 1975 Grant Road, Los Altos, CA 94024
• Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Library, 150 E. San Fernando Street, San Jose, CA 95112
• San Jose Public Library West Valley Branch, 1243 San Tomas Aquino Road, San Jose, CA
95117
• San Jose Public Library Calabazas Branch, 1230 S. Blaney Avenue, San Jose CA 95129
PROJECT LOCATION: The approximately 176 -acre project site is located in the City of Cupertino and
consists of an area generally bordered by East Homestead Road on the north; adjacent properties to the
east of North Tantau Avenue on the east; Interstate 280 (1-280) and The Hamptons apartment community
on the south; and North Wolfe Road on the west. Pruneridge Avenue extends through the site on a
roughly east/west alignment. The project site currently contains approximately 2,657,000 feet of office
and research and development buildings, some of which are occupied by Apple and formerly used by
Hewlett-Packard. Calabazas Creek crosses the southeastern portion of the site. (The project site consists
of the following Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs): 316-07-044, 316-07-045, 316-07-046, 316-06-045,
316-06-046, 316-06-053, 316-06-052, 316-06-048, 316-06-033, 316-06-051, 316-06-050, 316-06-049,
316-09-028, 316-09-019, 316-09-027, 316-18-035, 316-18-012, 316-18-025, 316-18-027, 316-18-026,
316-06-039, 316-06-038). Please refer to Figure 1 for a local and regional map showing the location of
the project.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project is development of the Apple 2 Campus. The project
would result in the demolition of all existing structures within the project site (consisting of approximately
2,657,000 square feet of building space) and the ultimate construction of 3,420,000 square feet of office,
research, and development uses; 245,000 square feet of auditorium, fitness center, and Valet Parking
Reception uses; 92,000 square feet of utility plants; and parking and ancillary buildings. In addition, Apple
is requesting that a segment of Pruneridge Avenue be vacated by the City to allow for the development of
a secure and unified campus. Development of the proposed project would require amendments to the
City of Cupertino General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, a Vacation and Land Purchase Agreement, Utility
Relocation and Easement Agreements, architectural and site approval, and various other City approvals,
possibly including a Development Agreement. The proposed project could require additional discretionary
permits or approvals from other non -City governmental entities.
SIGNIFICANT ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: The Draft EIR provides an evaluation of
the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project and recommends mitigation measures to
reduce impacts to a less -than -significant level. The project would result in significant environmental
impacts in the following topical areas: Planning Policy; Land Use; Biological Resources; Cultural
Resources; Geology, Soils, and Seismicity; Hydrology and Water Quality; Hazards and Hazardous
Materials; Transportation and Circulation; Noise; Air Quality; and Public Services and Utilities.
While most identified impacts would be reduced to a less -than -significant level with the implementation of
identified mitigation measures, impacts in the following topical areas would remain significant and
unavoidable, even after the implementation of feasible mitigation measures: Planning Policy; Land Use;
Transportation and Circulation; Air Quality; and Public Services and Utilities. A portion of the project site is
on lists of hazardous materials sites enumerated under Section 65962.5 of the Government Code.
QUESTIONS: If you have any questions about this project, please contact the Department of Community
Development at (408) 777-3308 or email applecampus2p_cupertino.org.
uz„ artshfreWay+ ..
�
Marin
County za
Dowunshhre Way
BERKELEY
' n
?N0�'d "'+'i
MrOt"yQB kyr _.
SAN FRANCISCO
Diu moardnrue Way
,0
bs
Lr
EtonWBY
HAYWARC
DUrEhIre Way
�," ;',
5,�Fnoar My
..Raynor
SAN MATED
Park
$
Hebn4ed Way Flim, Wayr
AJ
yyurridvwl lr Way
«w ,<
PALO ALTO
OAF 6
Im rru S," Fay .
� VnwBrn�66 t�rlyr.
Iruv'arnesliV01
v2 CUPERTINO
9
Kannard Way
..,
LOS
p
+rrSe NJn
= i dland
aruy r"e w y taN t�hti
db,
i
REGIONAL LOCATION 9 17
Leighton Eley
�
a iLo�n+dondeQay E)r
Lo rr6 Way
ee Law
HorneideoldRd � �
----------- komal Rd
�Cupertino,�
H
'
11 r r
/�
t Forge Ir " Kaiser Santa
8BllilYr m =-`".
" "
�
_
Clara Medical
-" „"„
■
■ Center
adN
�(1 ��orr
orww�d r ��' i,
♦�
■ ■ h Bea d E
■ ■ ■
A/
T
rz,
"edge
Beekmain Pt
Ave
■
Dr6
�♦
■ ■ y4ud4Bt
buun� Or �'�r� �� s� "
Westwood
'a b y y 6 Df, k ate"
arrrif Dr
■
■
r
,��
��
♦I ■
eas Tree Ln � �
�
■
■ d'^'IIBiYai� tock N Magellan gel4�rca Ave
�Amherst far"
v ■ Jnnyr................................................
._■
Portal Dark
ak
"D 4
,and Park
TIM M
u
I Alp &A
GATOS
JOSE
Lore a AY6 r
I
Relya CC
Sell
L S A FIGURE I
Project Site Boundary
0 500 1000
FEET Apple Campus 2 Project EIR
SOURCES: GOOGLE MAPS, LSAASSOCIATES, INC., 2011. Project Location Map
I:ACOC1101 Apple Campus 21figures\NOA\Fig_Lai (6/3/13)
THIS EIR IS SUBJECT TO CHAPTER 6.5 (COMMENCING WITH SECTION
21178) OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE, WHICH PROVIDES, AMONG
OTHER THINGS, THAT ANY JUDICIAL ACTION CHALLENGING THE
CERTIFICATION OF THE EIR OR THE APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT
DESCRIBED IN THE EIR IS SUBJECT TO THE PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN
SECTION 21185* OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE AND MUST BE FILED
WITH THE COURT OF APPEAL.** A COPY OF CHAPTER 6.5 OF THE
PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE IS INCLUDED AS AN APPENDIX TO THIS EIR.
* THIS LANGUAGE IS PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION 21187 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE. PLEASE
NOTE THAT SECTION 21187 REFERS TO "THE PROCEDURES SET
FORTH IN SECTION 21178.2 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE."
HOWEVER, THERE IS NO SECTION 21178.2. INSTEAD, THE
RELEVANT PROCEDURES ARE SET FORTH IN SECTION 21185 OF
THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE.
** PLEASE NOTE THAT PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21185
STATES IN PART THAT "THE ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL
BE FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEAL WITH GEOGRAPHIC
JURISDICTION OVER THE PROJECT." THAT CODE SECTION IS
THE SUBJECT OF LITIGATION COMMENCED IN THE SUPERIOR
COURT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY (PLANNING & CONSERVATION
LEAGUE V. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. RG12626904). ON
APRIL 9, 2013, THE COURT ISSUED A STATEMENT OF DECISION
DETERMINING THAT THE JURISDICTIONAL RESTRICTION IN
PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE SECTION 21185(a)(1) IS
UNCONSTITUTIONAL. AS OF MAY 23, 2013, THAT LITIGATION
WAS STILL PENDING. THE STATUS OF SECTION 21185(a)(1) MAY
OR MAY NOT CHANGE AFTER THE PRINTING OF THIS
DOCUMENT. INTERESTED PARTIES SHOULD DETERMINE FOR
THEMSELVES THE STATUS OF SECTION 21185(a)(1) WHEN
CONTEMPLATING ANY ACTION INVOLVING CHAPTER 6.5 OF
THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE. THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT THE EFFECT OF THIS
LITIGATION ON THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 6.5 OF THE
PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE.
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT
APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2011082055
Submitted to:
City of Cupertino
Community Development Department
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
Prepared by:
LSA Associates, Inc.
2215 Fifth Street
Berkeley, California 94710
510.540.7331
June 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................... 1
A. PURPOSE OF THIS DRAFT EIR.................................................................................... 1
B. PROPOSED PROJECT..................................................................................................... 1
C. EIR SCOPE....................................................................................................................... 2
D. REPORT ORGANIZATION............................................................................................ 3
II. SUMMARY................................................................................................................................. 5
A. PROJECT UNDER REVIEW........................................................................................... 5
B. SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES ..................................... 5
C. SUMMARY TABLE......................................................................................................... 8
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION........................................................................................................ 51
A.
PROJECT SITE...............................................................................................................
51
B.
PROJECT SITE HISTORY.............................................................................................
62
C.
PROJECT OBJECTIVES................................................................................................
62
D.
PROPOSED PROJECT...................................................................................................
64
E.
DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS.....................................................................................
138
F.
USES OF THIS EIR......................................................................................................
140
IV. PLANNING POLICY.............................................................................................................. 141
A. CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN.................................................................141
B. CITY OF CUPERTINO ZONING ORDINANCE........................................................ 160
C. NORTH VALLCO MASTER PLAN............................................................................ 165
D. GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR LAND USE NEAR STREAMS ................167
V. SETTING, IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES .....................................................
181
A.
LAND USE...................................................................................................................
185
B.
AESTHETICS...............................................................................................................
193
C.
POPULATION, EMPLOYMENT, AND HOUSING...................................................217
D.
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.......................................................................................235
E.
CULTURAL RESOURCES..........................................................................................
263
F.
GEOLOGY, SEISMICITY, AND SOILS.....................................................................289
G.
HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY..................................................................
303
H.
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.........................................................
321
I.
TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION..............................................................
347
J.
NOISE...........................................................................................................................
449
K.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND SUSTAINABILITY ..................................
481
L.
AIR QUALITY.............................................................................................................
519
M.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES........................................................................
561
P:\COC 1101 Apple 2 Camp,,s\PRODUCTS\DEIRT,ublic\00-Cover-TOC-Glossuy.doc (06/03/13) P UBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 1
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
JUNE 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS
VI. ALTERNATIVES....................................................................................................................597
A. NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE................................................................................... 599
B. PRUNERIDGE AVENUE ALTERNATIVE................................................................ 605
C. REDUCED CONSTRUCTION ALTERNATIVE........................................................ 612
D. REDUCED DENSITY ALTERNATIVE...................................................................... 619
E. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT REJECTED ................................................. 625
F. ENVIRONMENTALLY SUPERIOR ALTERNATIVE .............................................. 627
VII. OTHER CEQA CONSIDERATIONS..................................................................................... 629
A. EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT........................................................ 629
B. GROWTH -INDUCING IMPACTS.............................................................................. 629
C. SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS .......................... 630
D. SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE CHANGES............................................................. 631
VIII. REPORT PREPARATION...................................................................................................... 635
A. REPORT PREPARERS................................................................................................ 635
B. REFERENCES.............................................................................................................. 636
C. COMMUNICATION.................................................................................................... 650
APPENDICES (Provided on CD located inside the back cover of the Draft EIR)
Appendix A:
Notice of Preparation and Scoping Letters
Appendix B:
Transportation Impact Analysis
Appendix C:
Noise Data
Appendix D:
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data
Appendix E:
Air Quality Data
Appendix F:
Cumulative Projects
Appendix G:
SB610 Water Supply Assessment
Appendix H:
Student Generation/Enrollment Reports
Appendix L
Public Resources Code Chapter 6.5
P:\COC 1101 Apple 2 Campus\PRODUCTS\DEIRT,ublic\00-Cover-TOC-Glossary.doc (06/03/13) P UBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 11
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
JUNE 2015
APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FIGURES
Figure III -1:
Project Location Map..............................................................................................
52
FigureIII -2:
Project Site..............................................................................................................53
Figure III -3:
Existing and Proposed Trees...................................................................................
57
FigureIII -4:
Site Plan..................................................................................................................
67
Figure III -5a:
Site Plan—North.....................................................................................................69
Figure III -5b:
Site Plan — South.....................................................................................................
70
Figure III -6a:
Representative Sections..........................................................................................
71
Figure III -6b:
Representative Sections..........................................................................................
72
FigureIII -7a:
Rendering................................................................................................................
73
FigureIII -7b:
Rendering................................................................................................................
74
Figure III -8:
Main Building — Representative Plan.....................................................................
76
Figure III -9a:
Main Building — Representative Section (Restaurant) ............................................
77
Figure III -9b:
Main Building — Representative Section (Office) ...................................................
78
Figure III -10a:
Fitness Center — Representative Plan......................................................................
79
Figure III -1 Ob:
Fitness Center — Representative Sections...............................................................
80
Figure III -1 Ia:
Corporate Auditorium — Representative Plan .........................................................
82
Figure III -1 Ib:
Corporate Auditorium — Representative Section ....................................................
83
Figure III -12a:
Phase 2 Development—Plan and Section................................................................
84
Figure III -12b:
Phase 2 Development—Plan and Section................................................................
85
Figure III -13:
Central Plant — Representative Plan and Section ....................................................
87
Figure III -14:
Security Receptions —Representative Plan and Section .........................................
89
Figure III -15a:
Conceptual Landscape Plan —North.......................................................................
93
Figure III -15b:
Conceptual Landscape Plan — South.......................................................................
94
Figure III -16:
Circulation Plan......................................................................................................
97
Figure III -17a:
Off -Site Street Changes........................................................................................
105
Figure III -17b:
Off -Site Street Changes........................................................................................
106
Figure III -17c:
Off -Site Street Changes........................................................................................
107
Figure III -17d:
Off -Site Street Changes........................................................................................
108
Figure III -17e:
Off -Site Street Changes........................................................................................
109
Figure III -17f-
Off -Site Street Changes........................................................................................
110
Figure III -18:
Existing and Proposed Transit Routes..................................................................113
Figure III -19:
Existing and Proposed Bike and Pedestrian Systems ...........................................
114
Figure III -20a:
Perimeter Bike Facilities.......................................................................................
115
Figure III -20b:
Perimeter Bike Facilities.......................................................................................
116
Figure III -20c:
Perimeter Bike Facilities.......................................................................................
117
Figure III -20d:
Perimeter Bike Facilities.......................................................................................
118
Figure III -20e:
Perimeter Bike Facilities.......................................................................................
119
Figure III -20f.
Perimeter Bike Facilities.......................................................................................
120
Figure 111-21a:
Main Parking Structure Representative Plan — Levels B1 and 1 .........................
123
Figure III -21b:
Main Parking Structure Representative Section ..................................................
124
Figure III -22a:
North Tantau Parking Structure North.................................................................
126
Figure III -22b:
North Tantau Parking Structure South.................................................................
127
Figure 111-23:
Potential Recycled Water Infrastructure...............................................................131
Figure IV -1:
General Plan Land Use Designations....................................................................
143
Figure IV -2:
Zoning Designations.............................................................................................
161
Figure IV -3:
Mitigation Measure PLAN-3................................................................................
162
Figure V.B-1:
Photo Viewpoint Map...........................................................................................
195
P:\COC 1101 Apple 2 Campus\PRODUCTS\DEIRT,ublic\00-Cover-TOC-Glossary.doc (06/03/13) P UB%IC REVIEW DRAFT 111
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
JUNE 2015
APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Figure V.13-2:
Visual Simulations, Viewpoint 1, Wolfe Road Entrance ......................................196
Figure V.13-3:
Visual Simulations, Viewpoint 2,1-280 Westbound ............................................
197
Figure V.13-4:
Visual Simulations, Viewpoint 3, East Pruneridge Avenue .................................
198
Figure V.13-5:
Visual Simulations, Viewpoint 4, East Homestead Road and North
TantauAvenue ......................................................................................................
199
Figure V.13-6:
Visual Simulations, Viewpoint 5, East Homestead Road and North
WolfeRoad ...........................................................................................................
200
Figure V.13-7:
Visual Simulations, Viewpoint 6, Peacock Avenue ..............................................
201
Figure V.13-8:
Visual Simulations, Viewpoint 7, Tantau Avenue Overpass ................................
202
Figure V.13-9:
Visual Simulations, Viewpoint 8,1-280 Eastbound ..............................................
203
Figure V.B- 10:
Illuminance Calculations for Receptor Locations .................................................
213
Figure V.C- 1:
City of Cupertino Population Growth Trend, 1970-2030 .....................................
218
Figure V.C-2:
Residential Location of Current Employees on the Project Site ...........................
226
Figure V.D-I:
Representative Biological Resource Photographs ................................................
245
Figure V.E- 1:
Glendenning Barn Photographs ............................................................................
277
Figure V.F- 1:
Regional Faults .....................................................................................................
291
FigureV. G- 1:
Flood Zone ............................................................................................................
305
Figure V.H- 1:
Properties on Regulatory Databases of Hazardous Materials Releases
Within1/4 -Mile ....................................................................................................
325
Figure V.H-2:
Properties Within Project Site With Phase I and 11 Environmental Site
Assessments..........................................................................................................
326
Figure V.1- 1:
Campus Location and Study Locations ................................................................
349
Figure V.1-2:
Intersection LOS Standards ..................................................................................
355
Figure V.1-3:
Existing and Proposed Bicycle Facilities ..............................................................
361
Figure V.1-4:
Existing Bicycle and Pedestrian Turning Movement Volumes in
ProjectVicinity .....................................................................................................
362
Figure V.1-5:
Existing Transit Facilities .....................................................................................
363
Figure V.1-6:
Existing Intersection LOS Results ........................................................................
371
Figure V.1-7:
Project Trip Distribution .......................................................................................
391
Figure V.1-8:
Existing Plus Project Intersection LOS Results ....................................................
392
Figure V.1-9:
Background No Project and Background Plus Project Intersection
LOSResults ..........................................................................................................
401
Figure V.1- 10:
Cumulative No Project and Cumulative Plus Project Intersection
LOSResults ..........................................................................................................
407
Figure V.1-11:
Apple TDM Monitoring Process ...........................................................................
447
Figure VJ- 1:
Noise Monitoring Locations .................................................................................
455
Figure VJ-2:
Traffic Noise Level Changes from Existing to Existing Plus Project ...................
469
Figure VJ-3:
Traffic Noise Level Changes from Cumulative to Cumulative Plus Project ........
470
Figure V.K- 1:
California GHG Emissions by Sector (2000-2009 Average) ................................
488
Figure V.K-2:
Bay Area GHG Emissions by Sector (2007) ........................................................
489
Figure VI -1:
Conceptual Plan for No Project Alternative .........................................................
601
Figure VI -2:
Conceptual Plan for Pruneridge Avenue Alternative ............................................
607
Figure VI -3:
Conceptual Plan for Reduced Construction Alternative .......................................
613
Figure VI -4:
Conceptual Plan for Reduced Density Alternative ...............................................
621
P:\COCIIOIApple 2Ca.,p,,sTRODUCTS\DEIRT,ublic\00-Cover-TOC-Glossuy.doc(06103113)PLIBLICREVIEW DRAFT 1v
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
JUNE 2015
APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLES
Table II-1:
Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures from the EIR..................................
9
Table III-1:
Development Summary..........................................................................................
65
Table III-2:
Proposed Building Summary..................................................................................
66
Table III-3:
Required Permits and Approvals..........................................................................
140
Table IV-1:
Applicable General Plan Goals, Policies, and Programs ......................................170
Table V.B-1:
Illuminance Assessment of Receptor Locations...................................................
215
Table V.0-1:
City of Cupertino Historical Population Growth..................................................
217
Table V.0-2:
ABAG Population and Household Projections for Cupertino and Santa
Clara County 2010-2030.......................................................................................
218
Table V.0-3:
City of Cupertino and Santa Clara County Regional Housing Needs
Allocation, 2007-2014..........................................................................................
220
Table V.0-4:
Housing and Employment Data — Cupertino and Santa Clara County .................
223
Table V.0-5:
Projected Housing Demand by City Based on Residential Location of
Current Apple Employees.....................................................................................
227
Table V.0-6:
Project Housing Demand Compared To RHNA...................................................
229
Table V.0-7:
Housing and Employment Data — Without and With Project ...............................
230
Table V.D-1:
Special-Status Species Known to Occur or Potentially Occurring in the
Vicinity of the Project Site....................................................................................
250
Table V.F-1:
Modified Mercalli Scale.......................................................................................293
Table V.H-1:
Properties on Regulatory Databases of Hazardous Materials Releases Within
1/4-Mile of the Project Site.....................................................................................
323
Table V.1- 1:
Signalized Intersection Level of Service Definitions Using Average Control
VehicularDelay....................................................................................................
353
Table V.1-2:
Intersection LOS Standards..................................................................................
353
Table V.1-3:
Freeway Segment Level of Service Definitions....................................................
354
Table V.I4:
Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Counts on Pruneridge Avenue ..........................
360
Table V.1-5:
Existing Transit Service Summary.......................................................................
365
Table V.1-6:
Apple's Existing TDM Strategies.........................................................................
369
Table V.1-7:
Existing Freeway Segment Levels of Service.......................................................
374
Table V.1-8:
Trip Generation.....................................................................................................
388
Table V.I-9:
Levels of Service for Intersections Operating Unacceptably under Existing
Plus Project Conditions.........................................................................................
393
Table V.1- 10:
Existing Plus Project Freeway Segment Levels of Service ..................................
396
Table V.1- 11:
Levels of Service for Intersections Operating Unacceptably under
Background Plus Project Conditions....................................................................
400
Table V.1- 12:
Levels of Service for Intersections Operating Unacceptably under
Cumulative Plus Project Conditions.....................................................................
410
Table V.1- 13:
Wolfe Road VISSIM Approach Delays and Levels of Service ............................
415
Table V.1- 14:
Travel Metric Comparisons of Two Versus Three Left-Turn Lanes on Wolfe
Road Driveway During the PM Peak Hour..........................................................
417
Table V.1- 15:
PM Peak Hour Travel Times on Southbound Tantau Avenue ..............................
419
Table V.1-16:
Proposed Vehicle Parking Supply.........................................................................
433
Table V.1- 17:
Transit Center Driveway Level of Service...........................................................
438
Table V.1-18:
Left-Turn Vehicle Evaluation...............................................................................439
Table V.J-1:
Definitions of Acoustical Terms...........................................................................
451
Table V.J-2:
Typical A-Weighted Sound Levels.......................................................................
452
Table V.J-3:
Typical Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment .............................
453
P:\COC 1101 Apple 2 Camp,,s\PRODUCTS\DEIRT,ublic\00-Cover-TOC-Glossary.doc (06/03/13) P UB%IL' REVIEW DRAFT v
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.
JUNE 2015
APPLE CAMPUS 2 PROJECT EIR
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table V.J-4:
Short -Term Ambient Noise Monitoring Results, dBA, October 25, 2011 ...........
454
Table V.J-5:
Meteorological Conditions During Ambient Noise Monitoring ...........................
454
Table V.J-6:
Existing Traffic Noise Levels...............................................................................
457
Table V.J-7:
Summary of EPA Noise Levels............................................................................
458
Table V.J-8:
Summary of Human Effects in Areas Exposed to 55 dBA Ldn ...........................
458
Table V.J-9:
City of Cupertino Noise and Land Use Compatibility Standards .........................
461
Table V.J-10:
City of Cupertino Example Maximum Permissible Noise Levels ........................
462
Table V.J-11:
Existing and Existing Plus Project Traffic Noise Levels, dBA CNEL.................
467
Table V.J-12:
Cumulative and Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Noise Levels, dBA CNEL ......
468
Table V.J-13:
Existing and Existing Plus Construction Traffic Noise Levels at 50 feet
from Centerline of Outermost Travel Lane, dBA.................................................
474
Table V.J-14:
Typical Construction Equipment Maximum Noise Levels, Lm,x..........................
476
Table V.K-1:
Global Warming Potential of Greenhouse Gases .................................................482
Table V.K-2:
Project Construction Emissions (Metric Tons) .....................................................
504
Table V.K-3:
GHG Emissions (Metric Tons Per Year)..............................................................
510
Table V.K-4:
Project Compliance with Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Strategies .........
513
Table V.L-1:
Sources and Health Effects of Air Pollutants........................................................
520
Table V.L-2:
Ambient Air Quality at the 22601 Voss Ave, Cupertino, Monitoring Station......
526
Table V.L-3:
State and Federal Ambient Air Quality Standards ................................................
531
Table V.L-4:
Bay Area Attainment Status..................................................................................
535
Table V.L-5:
Project Construction Emissions in Pounds Per Day .............................................
546
Table V.L-6:
Regional Emissions from Existing On -Site Uses .................................................
548
Table V.L-7:
Project Regional Emissions..................................................................................
549
Table V.L-8:
Construction Equipment TACs.............................................................................
554
Table V.L-9:
Inhalation Health Risks from Project Construction to Off -Site Receptors ...........
557
Table V.L-10:
Cumulative Construction Health Risk Impacts .....................................................
559
Table V.L-11:
Cumulative Operational Health Risk Impacts ......................................................
560
Table V.M-1:
Cupertino Union School District Capacity and Enrollment Data .........................
564
Table V.M-2:
Fremont Union High School District Capacity and Enrollment Data ...................
565
Table V.M-3:
Santa Clara Unified School District Capacity and Enrollment Data ....................
566
Table V.M-4:
City of Cupertino Existing Park and Recreation Areas ........................................
567
Table V.M-5:
Cal Water Planned Water Supply and Demand (af).............................................
570
Table V.M-6:
Projected Cal Water Supply for Single and Multiple Dry -Years (afy).................
571
Table V.M-7:
WSA Potable & Non -Potable Water Demand Forecast for Proposed
Project(afy)..........................................................................................................
586
Table V.M-8:
Water Demand Projections for Cal Water and Typical Commercial
Development Scenario (af)...................................................................................
586
Table VI -1: Summary of Principal Characteristics of Alternatives....................................................
598
P:\COC 1101 Apple 2 Campus\PRODUCTS\DEIRT,ublic\00-Cover-TOC-Glossary.doc (06/03/13) P UB%IC REVIEW DRAFT vi