The URL can be used to link to this page

Appendix-D-GHG-Data APPENDIX D GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS DATA Construction Emissions Apple Campus 2 Total Construction Emissions Greenhouse Gas Emissions Summary Off-RoadTotal Annual EquipmentHaul Truck Worker Trip Construction Emissions (MT Emissions (MT Emissions (MT Emissions (MT Construction Year COe)COe)COe)COe) 2222 Year 110,4873,9673,41017,864 Year 24,5673,9257,19115,683 Year 32,0191,1099,99813,127 Year 4473956411,209 Total17,5469,09821,24147,884 Abbreviations COe: carbon dioxide equivalent 2 MT: metric tonne Apple Campus 2 Construction Emissions 1 CalEEMod Default On-Road Emission Factors for CO 2 Vehicle Type SeasonEmission TypeLDALDT1LDT2MHDHHD Idling Exhaust (g/trip) Annual average00012.61,150.9 Running Exhaust (g/VMT) Annual average376.8468.3472.41,371.81,774.8 Starting Exhaust (g/trip) Annual average71.888.389.216.425.3 1. From CalEEMod, run for Santa Clara County, 2013. Composite CalEEMod Default Emission Factors for CO by Trip Type 2 Type of Trip 123 WorkerVendorHaul Truck SeasonEmission Type Idling Exhaust (g/trip) Annual average0581.71,150.9 Running Exhaust (g/VMT) Annual average423.61,573.31,774.8 Starting Exhaust (g/trip) Annual average80.320.825.3 Notes 1. From the CalEEMod User's Guide, Appendix A: "The program can also assume that the workers’ personal vehicles consist of 50% light-duty auto (or passenger car), 25% light-duty truck type 1 (LDT1), and 25% light-duty truck type 2 (LDT2)." 2. From the CalEEMod User's Guide, Appendix A: "For vendor trips, CalEEMod has the option to choose the EMFAC mix or also choose all HHDT or all MHDT vehicles." The EMFAC mix is used here. These emission factors are all lower than the respective haul truck emission factors. Haul truck trip counts provided by DPR Skanska include vendor trip counts, so this represents a conservative overestimate of emissions from vendor trips. 3. From the CalEEMod User's Guide, Appendix A: "For hauling trips, CalEEMod has the option to choose the EMFAC mix, all MHDT, all HHDT or a 50% mix of MHDT and HHDT vehicles." All HHDT is used here. Abbreviations CO: carbon dioxide 2 CalEEMod: California Emissions Estimator Model EMFAC2011: EMission FACtors model, 2011 release HHD: Heavy-Heavy-Duty Trucks (33,001-60,000 lbs) LDA: Light-Duty Automobiles (Passenger Cars) LDT1: Light-Duty Trucks (0-3,750 lbs) LDT2: Light-Duty Trucks (3,751-5,750 lbs) MHD: Medium-Heavy-Duty Trucks (14,001-33,000 lbs) References California Air Resources Board. 2011. EMission FACtors Model, 2011 (EMFAC2011). Available online at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/modeling.htm#emfac2011_web_based_data South Coast Air Quality Management District. 2011. California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) User's Guide. Available online at www.caleemod.com. Apple Campus 2 Construction Emissions Calculation of Carpool Rate for Worker Trips Total California workers 16 years and over16,042,489 California workers 16 years and over who get to work by car, truck, or van -- carpooled 1,781,154 Fraction of California workers in the Construction Industry 5.7% Of all California workers who carpool, this fraction works in the Construction Industry 8.6% Count of California workers in the Construction Industry 914,422 Count of California workers in the Construction Industry who carpool who work 153,179 Carpool rate in the Construction Industry 16.8% Assumed workers per vehicle 2 References US Census Bureau. 2011. Community Survey, Table S0804, Means of Transportation to Work by Selected Characteristics for Workplace Geography. Available online at http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t and http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_11_1YR_S0804&p rodType=table. Baseline Emissions pple Campus 2 A ctual 2011 Baseline: Total Operational Emissions A Summary of Actual 2011 Baseline GHG Emissions Emissions Source 2011 Baseline, ENVIRON MT COe/year Energy12,155 2 MT COe/year Mobile16,817 2 MT COe/year Solid Waste332 2 MT COe/year Water209 2 Total29,513MT COe/year 2 Energy Emissions Calculations pple Campus 2 A ctual 2011 Baseline: Energy Emission As Determination of Electricity Usage Table E-3 of CEUS (2006) Total Electric Energy Intensity Building 2 Type(kWh/ft-yr) Large Office 17.70 Determination of Natural Gas Usage Table E-5 of CEUS (2006) Total Natural Gas Energy Intensity Building 2 Type(kBTU/ft-yr) Large Office 21.90 Determination of Emission Factor InputalueData Source V Statewide total electricity demand, ECDMS 2012 (tab 'ElectricityByCounty' of this 20092.78E+08MWhspreadsheet) COe due to In-State 2 Electricity Generation, ARB 2009 (tab 'Gross emissions & sinks' of this 2009 espreadsheet) MT CO 1.05E+08 2 e/MWh MT CO Emission factor:0.376 2 Difference from ARB factor likely due to rounding. MT COe/MWh ARB emission factor:0.372 2 Calculations for Electricity Use by Large Office Space Inputs to the calculation: InputData SourceValue AB900 Application (page 41 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2 .pdf) Full square footage is scaled by the ratio of actual Area1,354,790sq ftemployee count to full-occupancy employee count. Electricity Use Rate17.70kWh/sq ft-yearCEUS 2006 1 MWh =1,000kWh- Calculated COe EFMT COe/MWh 0.372 22 Actual 2011 Baseline Office Space Indirect Emissions from Electricity Use: MT COe/year 8,920 2 Calculations for Natural Gas Use by Large Office Space Inputs to the calculation: InputData SourceValue AB900 Application (page 41 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2 .pdf) Area1,354,790sq ft CEUS 2006 Electricity Use Rate21.90kBTU/sq ft-year 1 kWh =3.412kBTUARB 2012 1 MWh =1,000kWh- Calculated COe EFMT COe/MWh 0.372 22 Actual 2011 Baseline Office Space Indirect Emissions from Natural Gas Use: MT COe/year 3,235 2 Actual 2011 Baseline Total Indirect Emissions from Energy:12,155MT COe/year 2 References California Air Resources Board (ARB). 2012. Air Resources Board Staff Assessment of the Apple Campus 2 Application for Environmental Leadership Development Project. June. Available online at: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf California Air Resources Board (ARB). 2009. California Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory. Available online at http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm and http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/tables/ghg_inventory_by_sector_00-09_2011-10-26.xls California Commercial End-Use Survey (CEUS). 2006. Prepared for the California Energy Commission (CEC) by Itron, Inc., KEMA, ADM Associates, and James J. Hirsch & Associates. CEC-400-2006-005. March. Available online at http://www.energy.ca.gov/2006publications/CEC-400-2006-005/CEC-400-2006-005.PDF California Energy Consumption Data Management System (ECDMS). 2012. Available online at http://www.ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbycounty.aspx; downloaded 3 December 2012. Mobile Source Emissions Calculations pple Campus 2 A Mobile Source Emissions, Actual 2011 Baseline Summary of Mobile Source Emissions e Actual 2011 Baseline CO 2 ModeEmissions Commute Trips8,284MT/yea r Non-Commute Trips2,213MT/yea r Visitor Trips732MT/yea r Vendor Trips839MT/yea r Transit Trips - with biodiesel4,749MT/yea r Total16,817MT/year 2. From EMFAC2011 for vehicle classes LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, and MCY, calendar year 2011, Santa Clara County. Emission factors 1. From ARB Staff Assessment (2012, pages 11 and 19 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf). Emissions 6,94711.982503980.0000018,284MT/yea r 2 CO MT/g Emission 2 Factor (g/mi) 2 CO days per verage working 1 year A Length 1 (mi) Trip Total Vehicle Total Vehicle Trips per Trips per 1. Derived from count of Project vehicle trips per day 1 6,947 Day Day using 3.28 trips per day per employee and 4,844 are weighted by vehicle miles traveled (VMT). employees, as described in Attachment B. Total Vehicle Trips Calculation Emissions Calculations Commute Trips ctual Baselinectual Baseline ScenarioScenario Notes:Notes: 2 CO AA 3. From EMFAC2011 for vehicle classes LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, and MCY, calendar year 2011, Santa Clara County. Emission factors Emissions1. Trip length is from the AB900 Application (page 104 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) 7,41232503980.0000012,213MT/year 2. From ARB Staff Assessment (2012, page of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf). Trips per 2 Vehicle 2. Single-Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) rate, Carpool rate, and Carpool Density are from the AB900 Application (page 100 of Total 27,412 CO Day Roundtrip Trips/ MT/g 2 (people/ Emission vehicle) Density 3 Factor arpoo l (g/mi) 2 4,84472%10%2.22 CO C 2 days per % Carpool verage working 2 year 1. Employee count is from the AB900 Application (page 41 of 304 of this pdf: 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) A 2 Length % SOV 1 (mi) Trip http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) Total Vehicle 1 Trips per Employees Total Day are weighted by vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Total Vehicle Trips Calculation Emissions Calculations Non-Commute Trips Actual BaselineActual Baseline ScenarioScenario Notes:Notes: 2 CO 4. From EMFAC2011 for vehicle classes LHD1, LHD2, T6, and T7, calendar year 2011, Santa Clara County. Emission factors are weighted 1. Vendor trip rate of 190 round trips per day per 4,844 employees, times 2 trips per round trip, is from the AB900 Application (page 100 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf). The 2011 baseline ratio of 190 vendor trips per 4,844 Apple 4. From EMFAC2011 for vehicle classes LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, and MCY, calendar year 2011, Santa Clara County. Emission factors Emissions2. Trip length is from the AB900 Application (page 104 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) Emissions2. Trip length is from the AB900 Application (page 104 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) 9697.32603980.000001732MT/year3807.32601,1630.000001839MT/year 3. From ARB Staff Assessment (2012, page 20 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf)3. From ARB Staff Assessment (2012, page 20 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) 1. Visitor trip count per day is 10% of the employee count per day, from the AB900 Application (page 100 of 304 of this pdf: 22 COCO MT/gMT/g employees, approximately 4%, is applied to the total employee count to calculate the vendor trip count. EmissionEmission 44 FactorFactor (g/mi)(g/mi) 22 COCO http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf), times 2 trips per round trip. days per days per verageverage workingworking 33 yearyear AA LengthLength 22 (mi)(mi) TripTrip Total Vehicle Total Vehicle Trips per Trips per 11 DayDay are weighted by vehicle miles traveled (VMT). by vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Emissions Calculations Emissions Calculations Vendor Trips Visitor Trips Actual BaselineActual Baseline ScenarioScenario Notes:Notes: 22 COCO County. Emission factors are weighted by vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Includes a 15% credit for biodiesel in coaches and a 1. Apple Transit fuel biodiesel content, trip count per day, and length per route are from the AB900 Application (page 106 of ctual 2011 Baseline Sum:4,749MT/year Coaches7,1802602,4720.0000014,615MT/yearShuttles7212607160.000001134MT/year Emissions 3. From EMFAC2011 for vehicle classes UBUS for coaches and OBUS for shuttles, calendar year 2011, Santa Clara 2 CO MT/g Emission 3 Factor (g/mi) 2 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf). CO A days per verage working 2 2. From ARB Staff Assessment (2012, page 21 of 304 of this pdf: year http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) A Total Vehicle 15%3% Miles per 1 Day 3% credit for biodiesel in shuttles. Emissions Calculations 1 1 Shuttle biodiesel fuel content Coach biodiesel fuel content Apple Transit Trips Actual Baseline Scenario Notes: 2 CO California Air Resources Board. 2012. Air Resources Board Staff Assessment of the Apple Campus 2 Application for Environmental Leadership Development Project. June. Available online at: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf California Air Resources Board. 2011. EMission FACtors Model, 2011 (EMFAC2011). Available online at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/modeling.htm#emfac2011_web_based_data EMFAC2011: EMission FACtors model, 2011 release T6: Medium-Heavy-Duty-Trucks (14,001-33,000 lbs) LHD2: Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks (10,001-14,000 lbs) LHD1: Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks (8,501-10,000 lbs) T7: Heavy-Heavy-Duty-Trucks (33,001-60,000 lbs) LDA: Light-Duty Automobiles (Passenger Cars) MDV: Medium-Duty Trucks (5,751-8,500 lbs) LDT2: Light-Duty Trucks (3,751-5,750 lbs) ARB: (California) Air Resources Board LDT1: Light-Duty Trucks (0-3,750 lbs) AB900: (California) Assembly Bill 900 SOV: Single-Occupancy Vehicle VMT: vehicle miles traveled UBUS: Urban Buses OBUS: Other Buses : carbon dioxide MCY: Motorcycles Abbreviations MT: metric ton References mi: mile g: gram 2 CO Mobile Source Emissions Supporting Materials Actual 2011 Baseline Apple Campus Trip Generation Rate s Table 1, below, shows the trip rate per employee and the total daily trips for the existing Apple Campus, based on trip rates derived from surveys at the existing Infinite Loop campus. Table 1. Trip Generation - Existing Apple Campus Daily Trip Rate (trips/employee-Daily Trip Rate Land UseEmployee Countday)(trips/day) Existing Apple Campus4,8443.2815,888 The total trip count of 15,888 trips per day has been used to adjust the daily trip counts for the categories used by 1 ARB in its AB900 Determination. Trips were first divided into home-based work (i.e., commute) and non-home- based trips. Non-home-based trips were further divided into vendor, visitor, and Apple Transit trips, with the difference being non-commute trips. The trip rates developed in this way were used with the emission factors and methodology of ARB in its AB900 Determination to calculate Project greenhouse gas emissions. 1. California Air Resources Board. 2012. Air Resources Board Staff Assessment of the Apple Campus 2 Application for Environmental Leadership Development Project. June. Available online at: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf Development of Home-Based Work and Non-Home-Based Trip Counts Actual 2011 Baseline Apple Campus Total Trips per Day Trip typeData Source Total Trips15,872Assumes 3.28 trips per employee per day with 4,844 total employees for the Project scenario (that gives 15,888, rounded to match TIA) Development of Visitor, Vendor, Apple Transit, and Non-Commute Trip Counts Total Vehicle Trips per Day Trip typeData Source Non-Commute Trips7,412Calculated by ENVIRON assuming employees who drive to work make one round-trip commute trip per day; this includes a 72% SOV rate and a 10% carpool rate with 2.22 people per carpool on average. 96910% of employee population times two trips per round 1 Visitor Trips trip 380Vendor trip rate of 190 round trips per day per 4,844 1 Vendor Trips employees, times 2 trips per round trip, is from the AB900 Application (page 100 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus 2.pdf). 1 164Apple Transit trip count per day is from the AB900 Apple Transit Trips Application (page 106 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus 2.pdf). Home-Based Work Trips6,947Calculated by LSA by difference between total trips and non-commute, visitor, vendor, and Apple Transit trips. Notes: 1. These trip rates are determined using the methods ARB used in its Determination (available online at http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf). (grams 2 /mile) Exhaust CO Emission 398 1 2 Factor CO 1 Total Exhaust /day) Emissions 2 LDAGAS23,406,1168,30603638,669LDT1GAS2,510,6151,0320431,076LDT2GAS7,998,5593,91201584,070MDVGAS5,560,7043,45201323,584 LDADSL73,550270027MCYGAS246,476370340 (tons CO 100110013003 2 CO /day) 2 1 Exhaust CO Emissions Starting 2 (tons CO Idling Exhaust 1 Commute, Non-Commute and Visitor Trips /day) Emissions 2 (tons CO 2 CO /day) 2 1 Exhaust CO Emissions Running Emission Factor Calculations for Calendar Year 2011 2 (tons CO Vehicle Miles (miles/day) Traveled LDT1DSL3,235LDT2DSL3,160MDVDSL6,732 Santa Clara Count 2,000pounds y 453.592grams nnual average ll model years ll speeds Fuel 2011 AAA EMFAC2011 Query Inputs Cupertino, California 2 pple Campus 2 EMFAC2011 CO Vehicle Class Calendar Yea r Conversions Model Year 1 pound = Season 1 ton = Speed Are a A (grams 2 /mile) Exhaust CO Emission 1,163 1 2 Factor CO 1 Total Exhaust /day) Emissions 2 1,083 429 200124350241276103144 205614522125882717644347 9466 (tons CO 5005000010010000100120020000020038008 2 CO /day) 2 1 Exhaust CO Emissions Starting 2 24 (tons CO 0000030000000000000 020 Idling Exhaust 1 /day) Emissions 2 14 (tons CO 1441 310001130008141333 2 CO Vendor Trips /day) 2 1 Exhaust CO Emissions Running 2 1,056 123347233262141426 199 633947 926620551449212485269914 (tons CO Vehicle Miles (miles/day) Traveled 221,849 988,060342,717113,203265,250121,435136,609 15,00342,07293,72410,66465,25710,61412,59344,22313,44551,09773,64932,57620,30024,28811,885 85,878 1,236 3,6391,7987,459 234792134454 Fuel GASGAS GASGAS DSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLT7 single constructionDSLDSLDSLT7 tractor constructionDSLDSL DSLDSLDSLDSLT6 instate construction heavyDSLT6 instate construction smallDSLT7 CAIRP constructionDSL T6 CAIRP heavy T6 CAIRP small T6 instate heavy T6 instate small T6 OOS heavy T6 OOS small Vehicle Class T7 other port T7 NNOOS T7 tractor T7 CAIRP T7 SWCV T7 NOOS T7 Single T6 PublicT7 Public T7 POAK T7 POLA T7 utility T6 utility T6 AgT7 Ag LHD1LHD1LHD2LHD2 T6TS T7IS (grams 2 /mile) Exhaust CO Emission 2,472 716 1 2 Factor CO 1 Total Exhaust /day) Emissions 2 148 27 (tons CO 5005 2 CO s. d ar /day) 2 d 1 an Exhaust CO Emissions Starting t 2 ons s (tons CO 1 0 i ss i em (LCFS) Idling Exhaust 1 /day) Emissions 2 (tons CO s 00 d ar d Shuttle Bus Trips 2 an CO Transit Trips Coach Trips St l /day) ue 2 1 F Exhaust CO Emissions Running on 2 148 26 (tons CO b ar C ow L d Vehicle Miles an (miles/day) I Traveled ey 34,597 50,498 5,555 l av P e th f on o ti a t Fuel op GAS GAS DSL d e a d u l nc i ors t ac f on Vehicle Class i ss i em 2 Notes: OBUS UBUSUBUS CO . 1 T6 CAIRP small: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel CA International Registration Plan Truck with GVWR<=26000 lbs T6 CAIRP heavy: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel CA International Registration Plan Truck with GVWR>26000 lbs T6 instate construction small: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel instate construction Truck with GVWR<=26000 lbs T6 instate construction heavy: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel instate construction Truck with GVWR>26000 lbs T7 CAIRP construction: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel CA International Registration Plan Construction Truck T6 OOS small: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel Out-of-state Truck with GVWR<=26000 lbs T6 OOS heavy: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel Out-of-state Truck with GVWR>26000 lbs T6 instate small: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel instate Truck with GVWR<=26000 lbs T6 instate heavy: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel instate Truck with GVWR>26000 lbs T7 single construction: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Single Unit Construction Truck T7 CAIRP: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel CA International Registration Plan Truck T7 tractor construction: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Tractor Construction Truck T7 NNOOS: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Non-Neighboring Out-of-state Truck T7 other port: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Drayage Truck at Other Facilities T7 POLA: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Drayage Truck near South Coast T7 NOOS: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Neighboring Out-of-state Truck T7 SWCV: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Solid Waste Collection Truck T7 POAK: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Drayage Truck in Bay Area T6 Public: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel Public Fleet Truck T6 utility: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel Utility Fleet TruckT7 Public: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Public Fleet Truck T7 Single: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Single Unit Truck EMFAC2011: EMission FACtors model, 2011 release LHD2: Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks (10,001-14,000 lbs) T6 Ag: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel Agriculture Truck LHD1: Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks (8,501-10,000 lbs) T7 Ag: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Agriculture Truck LDA: Light-Duty Automobiles (Passenger Cars) MDV: Medium-Duty Trucks (5,751-8,500 lbs) T6TS: Medium-Heavy Duty Gasoline Truck LDT2: Light-Duty Trucks (3,751-5,750 lbs) LDT1: Light-Duty Trucks (0-3,750 lbs) LCFS: Low-Carbon Fuel Standard OBUS: Other Buses : carbon dioxide MCY: Motorcycles Abbreviations GAS: gasoline DSL: diesel 2 CO Available online at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/modeling.htm#emfac2011_web_based_data California Air Resources Board. 2011. EMission FACtors Model, 2011 (EMFAC2011). T7 utility: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Utility Fleet Truck T7 tractor: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Tractor Truck T7IS: Heavy-Heavy Duty Gasoline Truck UBUS: Urban Buses References Total Vehicle Miles per Day 205228228166166 724703692724703692243325274306306 57686868688383 138.157.15336.955.35336.955.35 9.6749.974.859.6748.572.759.6747.771.559.6749.974.859.6748.572.759.6747.771.55354.181.15454.181.15 345.668.4445.668.4145.668.45176.55176.5222.834.2222.834.2318.427.6318.427.6 145.668.4 38573857 3 Trip Length (miles) 2 Time of DayFrequency 4444 AMPMAMPMFremont AMPMAMPMAMPMAMPMAMPMBelmont/San Carlos/Redwood CityAMBelmont/San Carlos/Redwood CityPMAMPM Apple Transit Trip Routes, Frequencies, and Lengths San Francisco - Colma Express Gilroy/Morgan Hill/Blossom HillGilroy/Morgan Hill/Blossom Hill Oakland/Berkeley/AlamedaOakland/Berkeley/Alameda San Francisco - DivisaderoSan Francisco - Divisadero San Francisco - Van NessSan Francisco - Van Ness San Francisco - 19th AveSan Francisco - 19th Ave 1 Route Santa Clara/MilpitasSanta Clara/Milpitas Santa CruzSanta Cruz PleasantonPleasanton Union CityUnion City Fremont Cupertino, California COACH RUNS (50 passenger pple Campus 2 Transit Type capacity) A Total Vehicle Miles per Day 3. Trip lengths estimated from route maps using Google Earth and a conservative 50% is added to each route to account for miles 127137 24244141585862624545 312.919.35312.919.359.914.859.914.85 AM136.59.75PM146.59.755.37.955.37.95913.5913.5 313.820.7313.820.7 3 Trip Length (miles) 2. Frequency of San Francisco routes distributed evenly for the 3 sub-routes for calculation purposes. 2 Time of DayFrequency 164 333333 Cupertino population 12,750 ) AMPMAMPMAMPMAMPMAMPM 1. Routes and frequencies provided by Apple. traveled when the vehicle is not occupied. 1 ( Route TOTAL Sunnyvale CaltrainSunnyvale Caltrain San Jose CaltrainSan Jose Caltrain Mt View CaltrainMt View Caltrain Los GatosLos Gatos CampbellCampbell Los AltosLos Altos SHUTTLE RUNS Walk-ons as well - connecting to (16 passenger accomodates Transit Type transit but capacity) Notes Solid Waste Emissions Calculations pple Campus 2 A ctual 2011 Baseline: Solid Waste Emissions A Determination of Solid Waste Generation Rate Commercial waste generation rate (City of Los Angeles 2006): 10.53lb waste/employee-da y Convert this value to kg/employee-year for use in subsequent calculations: InputValueData Source lb waste/employe Waste Generation e-day 10.53City of Los Angeles 2006 Rate RB 2012a (page 25 of 304 of this pdf: A Average working http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pd days/year days per year250f) 1 lb =453.592g- 1 kg =1000g- Commercial waste generation rate (City of Los Angeles 2006): 1194.081kg waste/employee-yea r Determination of Diversion Rate From CalRecycle (2012): "The 2011 per employee disposal rate dropped to 11.3 pounds/employee/day resulting in a slight bump in the per employee "diversion rate equivalent" to 64% compared to 63% in 2010." Diversion rate:63%for 2010 Determination of Emission Factor Method: mass balance on carbon entering in municipal solid waste Calculate the amount of Anaerobically Degradable Carbon (ANDOC) in 1 ton of solid wast e InputValueData Source ANDOC7.7%RB 2012b A lb 1 ton =-2,000 1 lb =453.592g- 1 MT =1,000,000g- Total ANDOC in 1 ton waste: 0.070MT ANDOC/1 ton waste Calculate the amount of uncaptured ANDOC in 1 ton wast e InputalueData Source V MT ANDOC/1 Total ANDOC in 1 ton ton waste waste0.070Calculated Captured portion of Landfill Gas85%ARB 2012b Uncaptured portion of Landfill Gas15%ARB 2012b Oxidized portion of carbon in the landfill cap10%ARB 2012b Unoxidized portion of carbon in the landfill cap90%ARB 2012b Uncaptured ANDOC in 1 ton waste: 9.43E-03MT uncaptured ANDOC/1 ton waste Calculate the amount of captured and uncontrolled ANDOC in 1 ton wast e InputalueData Source V MT ANDOC/1 Total ANDOC in 1 ton ton waste waste0.070Calculated Captured portion of Landfill Gas85%ARB 2012b Controlled portion of captured Landfull Gas 99%ARB 2012b Uncontrolled portion of captured Landfull Gas1%ARB 2012b Captured and Uncontrolled ANDOC in 1 ton waste: 5.94E-04MT captured and uncontrolled ANDOC/1 ton waste Calculate the amount of uncaptured and captured and uncontrolled ANDOC in 1 ton wast e Total ANDOC available for release in 1 ton waste: 1.00E-02MT ANDOC/1 ton waste Calculate methane (CH) emissions from uncaptured and captured and uncontrolled ANDOC in carbon 4 dioxide equivalents (COe) 2 InputValueData Source Total ANDOC MT ANDOC/1 available for release ton waste in 1 ton waste0.010Calculated Portion of Landfill Gas releasted as CH 50%ARB 2012b 4 ARB 2012b. Emissions of carbon dioxide (CO) are not Portion of Landfill 2 attributed to solid waste. Gas releasted as CO 50% 2 100-year Global Warming Potential of IPCC 1996 g COe/g CH CH 21 24 4 Molecular weight of - CH 16.04g/mol 4 Molecular weight of C-12.01g/mol COe emitted from 1 ton waste: 2 MT COe/1 ton waste 0.141 2 Calculate the Ce emission factor for solid waste O 2 InputData SourceValue MT COe/1 ton CH emitted from 1 2 4 waste ton waste0.141Calculated lb 1 ton =2,000- 1 lb =453.592g- 1 MT =1,000,000g- COe emission factor for solid waste: 2 MT COe/tonne waste 0.155 2 Calculations for Commercial Sector Calculate Ce emissions from solid waste disposa Ol 2 InputalueData Source V B900 Application (page 41 of 304 of this pdf: A http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pd Total Employees4,844employeesf) kg waste/employe Waste Generation e-year RateCity of Los Angeles 20061,194 RB 2012a (page 25 of 304 of this pdf: A http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pd Days per Year250days/yearf) Diversion Rate63%CalRecycle 2012 COe Emission 2 FactorCalculated MT COe/tonne 0.155 2 Actual 2011 Baseline Total Indirect Emissions from Solid Waste: MT COe/year 332 2 References California Air Resources Board. 2012a. Air Resources Board Staff Assessment of the Apple Campus 2 Application for Environmental Leadership Development Project. June. Available online at: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf California Air Resources Board. 2012b. Email between Webster Tasat of the California Air Resources Board and Catherine Mukai of ENVIRON, 20 November 2012. California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). 2012. California's 2011 Per Capita Disposal Rate website: http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/GoalMeasure/DisposalRate/MostRecent/default.htm. Accessed 11 November 2012. City of Los Angeles. 2006. LA CEQA Thresholds Guide Section M, Public Utilities. Available online at: http://www.ci.la.ca.us/ead/programs/Thresholds/M-Public%20Utilities.pdf Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 1996. Climate Change 1995; The Science of Climate Change. Contribution of WGI to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available online at: https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B1gFp6Ioo3aka3NsaFQ3YlE3XzA Water Emissions Calculations pple Campus 2 A ctual 2011 Baseline: Water Emissions A Determination of Emission Factor Excerpt of Table A4-6 of CPUC and WetCat 2010: State Average (ton CO/AF) Stage 2 Suppl0.6 y Treatment0.01 Distribution0.1 Wastewater0.1 End Use1.7 Total2.51 F = acre foot A Based on ARB 2012, exclude End Use to get the following emission factor for indirect emissions from water: CO emission factorton COAF / 0.81 22 Convert this value to MT COe/Mgal for use in subsequent calculations: 2 InputValueData Source ton CO/AF CO emission factor 0.81Calculated 2 2 1 AF =-325,851gal 1 Mgal =1,000,000gal- 1 ton =2,000lb- 1 lb =453.592g- 1 MT =1,000,000g- e emission factor for water: CO 2 MT COe/Mgal 2.255 2 Calculations for Office Space Inputs to the calculation: InputValueData Source B900 Application (page 41 of 304 of this pdf: A http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2 Area1,3551,000 sq ft .pdf) Water Use Rate146.5gal/1,000 sq ft-daCity of Milpitas 2009 y Days per Yea365days/yea- rr 1 Mgal =1,000,000gal- Implementing a Public Goods Charge for Water, Table A4-6. Includes Supply, Treatment, Distribution, and Wastewater. Excludes End Use. COe EFMT COe/MGal 2.255 22 ctual 2011 Baseline Office Space Indirect Emissions from Water: A MT COe/yea r 163 2 Calculations for Landscaping Inputs to the calculation: InputValueData Source AB900 Application (page 41 of 304 of this pdf: Permeablehttp://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2 1,856,000sq ft Landscape.pdf) 1 acre =43,560sq ft- Area43acresCalculated Water Use Rate1,300gal/acre-dayCity of Milpitas 2009 Days per Year365days/year- 1 Mgal =########gal- COe EFMT COe/MGal 2Implementing a Public Goods Charge for Water, Table A4 22 Actual 2011 Baseline Landscaping Indirect Emissions from Water: MT COe/year 46 2 Actual 2011 Baseline Total Indirect Emissions from Water:e/year 209MT CO 2 References California Air Resources Board. 2012. Air Resources Board Staff Assessment of the Apple Campus 2 Application for Environmental Leadership Development Project. June. Available online at: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf City of Milpitas. 2009. Water Master Plan Update. December. Available online at: http://www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/_pdfs/eng_mp_water.pdf California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and the Water Energy Team of the Climate Action Team (WetCat). 2010. Implementing a Public Goods Charge for Water. July. Available online at: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/docs/cwpu2009/0310final/v4c02a19_cwp2009.pdf Phase 1 Emissions pple Campus 2 A Total Operational Emissions, Phase 1 onl y Summary of Project 2016 GHG Emissions, Phase 1 onl y 2016 Project Emissions, Phase 1 Emissions Sourceonly MT COe/yea r Energy0 2 MT COe/yea r Mobile33,716 2 MT COe/yea r Solid Waste890 2 MT COe/yea r Water373 2 MT COe/yea r Total34,978 2 Mobile Source Emissions Calculations pple Campus 2 A B900 Application Updates: Mobile Source Emissions, Phase 1 onl Ay Summary of Mobile Source Emissions 2016 Project COe Emissions Mode 2 Commute Trips19,901MT/yea r Non-Commute Trips5,785MT/yea r Visitor Trips1,700MT/yea r Vendor Trips2,258MT/yea r Transit Trips - with biodiesel4,072MT/yea r Total33,716MT/year Trips per Vehicle 2300219,291 Total Day 1. Employee counts are from the AB900 Application (page 38 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) 2. Single-Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) rate, Carpool rate, and Carpool Density are from the AB900 Application (page 100 of 304 of this pdf: 2. From EMFAC2011 for vehicle classes LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, and MCY, calendar year 2016, Santa Clara County. Emission factors 1. From ARB Staff Assessment (2012, pages 11 and 19 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf). Roundtrip Electric Vehicle Trips/ Emissions Project 201619,29111.982503440.00000119,901MT/yea r Electric 32 Vehicle Count CO 3. Count of 300 electric vehicles during Project operation is from the AB900 Application (page 28 of 304 of this pdf: Roundtrip Trips/ MT/g 2 (people/ CarpoolEmission vehicle) Density 2 Factor (g/mi) 2 13,00072%10%2.22 CO days per 2 verage Carpool working 1 year % A 2 Length % SOV 1 (mi) Trip http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf)http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) Total Vehicle 1 Trips per Employees Total Day are weighted by vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Total Vehicle Trips Calculation Emissions Calculations Commute Trips Project 2016 ScenarioScenario Notes:Notes: 2 CO 3. From EMFAC2011 for vehicle classes LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, and MCY, calendar year 2016, Santa Clara County. Emission factors 1. Trip length is from the AB900 Application (page 104 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) Emissions 22,39232503440.0000015,785MT/year 2. From ARB Staff Assessment (2012, page of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf). 2 CO MT/g Total Vehicle 1. Derived from count of Project vehicle trips per day using 3.59 trips per day per employee and Combustion Trips per 2. Count of 300 electric vehicles during Project operation is from the AB900 Application (page Emission Engines 3 Factor 22,992300222,392 (g/mi) Day, 2 CO 28 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) days per EV Trips/ Roundtri Average working 2 year p Electric 3 Vehicle Length Count 1 (mi) Trip Total Vehicle Total Vehicle Combustion Trips per Trips per Day, All 1 Engines Vehicles Day, 14,200 employees, as described in Attachment B. are weighted by vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Total Vehicle Trips Calculation Emissions Calculations Non-Commute Trips Project 2016Project 2016 ScenarioScenario Notes:Notes: 2 CO 1. Vendor trip rate of 190 round trips per day per 4,844 employees, times 2 trips per round trip, is from the AB900 Application (page 100 4. From EMFAC2011 for vehicle classes LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, and MCY, calendar year 2016, Santa Clara County. Emission factors of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf). The 2011 baseline ratio of 190 vendor trips per 4,844 2. Trip length is from the AB900 Application (page 104 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf)2. Trip length is from the AB900 Application (page 104 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) Emissions Emissions 2,6007.32603440.0000011,700MT/year1,0207.32601,1670.0000012,258MT/year 4. From EMFAC2011 for vehicle classes LHD1, LHD2, T6, and T7, calendar year 2016, Santa Clara County. Emission factors are 3. From ARB Staff Assessment (2012, page 20 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf)3. From ARB Staff Assessment (2012, page 20 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) 1. Visitor trip count per day is 10% of the employee count per day, from the AB900 Application (page 100 of 304 of this pdf: 22 COCO Apple employees, approximately 4%, is applied to the total employee count to calculate the vendor trip count. MT/gMT/g EmissionEmission 44 FactorFactor (g/mi)(g/mi) 22 http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf), times 2 trips per round trip. COCO days per days per verageverage workingworking 33 yearyear AA LengthLength 22 (mi)(mi) TripTrip Total Vehicle Total Vehicle Trips per Trips per 11 DayDay are weighted by vehicle miles traveled (VMT). weighted by vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Emissions Calculations Emissions Calculations Vendor Trips Visitor Trips Project 2016Project 2016 ScenarioScenario Notes:Notes: 22 COCO County. Emission factors are weighted by vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Includes a 15% credit for biodiesel in coaches and employee population of 12,750 used to calculate the 2011 baseline vehicle miles per day (also on page 106 of 304 of this 1. Apple Transit fuel biodiesel content, trip count per day, and length per route are from the AB900 Application (page 106 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf). For the Project, ENVIRON assumes trip Project 2016 Sum:4,072MT/year Coaches7,3212602,0070.0000013,820MT/yearShuttles7352606750.000001129MT/yearGarage shuttles7002606750.000001123MT/year frequencies scale with employee population based on the ratio of employee population to the 2011 all-Cupertino Apple 3. From EMFAC2011 for vehicle classes UBUS for coaches and OBUS for shuttles, calendar year 2016, Santa Clara Emissions 2 CO MT/g Emission 3 Factor (g/mi) 2 CO days per verage working 2 pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf). 2. From ARB Staff Assessment (2012, page 21 of 304 of this pdf: year http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) A Total Vehicle 15%3%3% Miles per 1 Day 1 Garage shuttle biodiesel fuel content a 3% credit for biodiesel in shuttles. Emissions Calculations 1 1 Shuttle biodiesel fuel content Coach biodiesel fuel content Apple Transit Trips Project 2016 Scenario Notes: 2 CO California Air Resources Board. 2012. Air Resources Board Staff Assessment of the Apple Campus 2 Application for Environmental Leadership Development Project. June. Available online at: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf California Air Resources Board. 2011. EMission FACtors Model, 2011 (EMFAC2011). Available online at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/modeling.htm#emfac2011_web_based_data EMFAC2011: EMission FACtors model, 2011 release T6: Medium-Heavy-Duty-Trucks (14,001-33,000 lbs) LHD2: Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks (10,001-14,000 lbs) LHD1: Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks (8,501-10,000 lbs) T7: Heavy-Heavy-Duty-Trucks (33,001-60,000 lbs) LDA: Light-Duty Automobiles (Passenger Cars) MDV: Medium-Duty Trucks (5,751-8,500 lbs) LDT2: Light-Duty Trucks (3,751-5,750 lbs) ARB: (California) Air Resources Board LDT1: Light-Duty Trucks (0-3,750 lbs) AB900: (California) Assembly Bill 900 SOV: Single-Occupancy Vehicle VMT: vehicle miles traveled UBUS: Urban Buses OBUS: Other Buses : carbon dioxide MCY: Motorcycles Abbreviations MT: metric ton References mi: mile g: gram 2 CO Mobile Source Emissions Supporting Materials Apple Campus 2 Trip Generation Rates The proposed trip generation rate per employee has not changed from that submitted in the initial AB900 application, 3.59 trips per day per employee. With 13,000 employees in Phase 1 of the Project, the total trip generation rate is 46,670 trips per day. Table 1, below, shows the trip rate per employee and the total daily trips for the proposed Apple Campus 2 Phase 1, based on trip rates derived from surveys at the existing Infinite Loop campus. As discussed in its AB900 application, Apple Campus 2 trip rates on a daily basis are similar to the industry-standard Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates for land uses with similar characteristics—single tenant office building, and research and development center. Apple Campus 2 AM peak hour and PM peak hour trip rates are lower than the ITE rates, however, indicating that travel will be more spread out over the day. Table 1. Trip Generation - Apple Campus 2 Phase 1 Daily Trip Rate (trips/employee-Daily Trip Rate Land UseEmployee Countday)(trips/day) Apple Campus 2 Phase 113,0003.5946,670 The total trip count of 46,670 trips per day has been used to adjust the daily trip counts for the 1 categories used by ARB in its AB900 Determination. Trips were first divided into home-based work (i.e., commute) and non-home-based trips. Non-home-based trips were further divided into vendor, visitor, and Apple Transit trips, with the difference being non-commute trips. The trip rates developed in this way were used with the emission factors and methodology of ARB in its AB900 Determination to calculate Project greenhouse gas emissions. 1. California Air Resources Board. 2012. Air Resources Board Staff Assessment of the Apple Campus 2 Application for Environmental Leadership Development Project. June. Available online at: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf Development of Home-Based Work and Non-Home-Based Trip Counts, Phase 1 only Proposed Apple Campus 2 Total Trips per Day Trip typeData Source Total Trips46,670Assumes 3.59 trips per employee per day with 13,000 total employees for the Project scenario Home-Based Work Trips19,891Calculated by ENVIRON assuming employees who drive to work make one round-trip commute trip per day; this includes a 72% SOV rate and a 10% carpool rate with 2.22 people per carpool on average. Includes electric vehicle trips. Non-Home-Based Trips26,779Calculated by ENVIRON by difference between total trips and commute trips. Non-home-based trips are assumed to include non-commute, visitor, vendor, and Apple Transit trips as used in the ARB Determination. Development of Visitor, Vendor, Apple Transit, and Non-Commute Trip Counts Total Vehicle Trips per Day Trip typeData Source Total Non-Home-Based Trips26,779Calculated by ENVIRON by difference between total trips and commute trips 1 2,60010% of employee population times two trips per round Visitor Trips trip 1 1,020Vendor trip rate of 190 round trips per day per 4,844 Vendor Trips employees, times 2 trips per round trip, is from the AB900 Application (page 100 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus 2.pdf). The 2011 baseline ratio of 190 vendor trips per 4,844 Apple employees, approximately 4%, is applied to the total employee count of 14,200 to calculate the vendor trip count. 167Apple Transit trip count per day is from the AB900 1 Apple Transit Trips Application (page 106 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus 2.pdf). For the Project, ENVIRON assumes trip frequencies scale with employee population based on the ratio of employee population to the 2011 all- Cupertino Apple employee population of 12,750 used to calculate the 2011 baseline vehicle miles per day (also on page 106 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus 2.pdf). Non-Commute Trips22,992Calculated by ENVIRON by difference between total non-home-based trips and visitor, vendor, and Apple Transit trips. Includes electric vehicle trips. 1. These trip rates are determined using the methods ARB used in its Determination (available online at http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf). (grams 2 /mile) Exhaust CO Emission 344 1 2 Factor CO 1 Total Exhaust /day) Emissions 2 LDAGAS24,855,4727,42103277,748LDT2GAS8,364,5063,62401483,772MDVGAS5,585,2193,16401263,291 LDT1GAS2,619,041941039981 LDADSL82,784260026MCYGAS271,449440347 (tons CO 100110012002 2 CO /day) 2 1 Exhaust CO Emissions Starting 2 (tons CO Idling Exhaust 1 Commute, Non-Commute and Visitor Trips /day) Emissions 2 (tons CO 2 CO /day) 2 1 Exhaust CO Emissions Running Emission Factor Calculations for Calendar Year 2016 2 (tons CO Vehicle Miles (miles/day) Traveled LDT1DSL3,892LDT2DSL3,841MDVDSL7,023 Santa Clara Count 2,000pounds y 453.592grams nnual average ll model years ll speeds Fuel 2016 AAA EMFAC2011 Query Inputs Cupertino, California 2 pple Campus 2 EMFAC2011 CO Vehicle Class Calendar Yea r Conversions Model Year 1 pound = Season 1 ton = Speed Are a A 1,167 1,057 112144179531 192142379303343 225617592126302067495010 9563 00000 5005000010010000100130033103 24 00000200000000000000 020 1824 8153524710 310001241002 Vendor Trips 1,030 140375285319104139174524 191 291765454810 9263225516562125 173,875282,367 995,751342,278112,061110,830299,317154,561 17,05144,03112,64578,33411,19613,47756,28715,57273,94893,74034,86224,01625,99215,563 89,291 8,8241,430 3,8482,086 279919160527 GASGAS GASGAS DSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLT7 single constructionDSLDSLDSLT7 tractor constructionDSLDSL DSLDSLDSLDSLT6 instate construction heavyDSLT6 instate construction smallDSLT7 CAIRP constructionDSL T6 CAIRP heavy T6 CAIRP small T6 instate heavy T6 instate small T6 OOS heavy T6 OOS small T7 other port T7 NNOOS T7 tractor T7 CAIRP T7 SWCV T7 NOOS T7 PublicT7 Single T6 Public T7 POAK T7 POLA T7 utility T6 utility T6 AgT7 Ag LHD1LHD1LHD2LHD2 T6TS T7IS 2,361 696 emission factors include adoptation of the Pavley I and Low Carbon Fuel Standards (LCFS) emissions standards in future years. 145 24 5005 1 0 00 Shuttle Bus Trips Transit Trips Coach Trips 145 23 31,716 51,758 5,693 GAS GAS DSL 2 Notes OBUS UBUSUBUS 1. CO T6 CAIRP small: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel CA International Registration Plan Truck with GVWR<=26000 lbs T6 CAIRP heavy: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel CA International Registration Plan Truck with GVWR>26000 lbs T6 instate construction small: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel instate construction Truck with GVWR<=26000 lbs T6 instate construction heavy: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel instate construction Truck with GVWR>26000 lbs T7 CAIRP construction: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel CA International Registration Plan Construction Truck T6 OOS small: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel Out-of-state Truck with GVWR<=26000 lbs T6 OOS heavy: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel Out-of-state Truck with GVWR>26000 lbs T6 instate small: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel instate Truck with GVWR<=26000 lbs T6 instate heavy: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel instate Truck with GVWR>26000 lbs T7 single construction: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Single Unit Construction Truck T7 CAIRP: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel CA International Registration Plan Truck T7 tractor construction: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Tractor Construction Truck T7 NNOOS: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Non-Neighboring Out-of-state Truck T7 other port: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Drayage Truck at Other Facilities T7 POLA: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Drayage Truck near South Coast T7 NOOS: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Neighboring Out-of-state Truck T7 SWCV: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Solid Waste Collection Truck T7 POAK: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Drayage Truck in Bay Area T6 Public: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel Public Fleet Truck T6 utility: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel Utility Fleet TruckT7 Public: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Public Fleet Truck T7 Single: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Single Unit Truck EMFAC2011: EMission FACtors model, 2011 release LHD2: Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks (10,001-14,000 lbs) T6 Ag: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel Agriculture Truck LHD1: Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks (8,501-10,000 lbs) T7 Ag: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Agriculture Truck LDA: Light-Duty Automobiles (Passenger Cars) MDV: Medium-Duty Trucks (5,751-8,500 lbs) T6TS: Medium-Heavy Duty Gasoline Truck LDT2: Light-Duty Trucks (3,751-5,750 lbs) LDT1: Light-Duty Trucks (0-3,750 lbs) LCFS: Low-Carbon Fuel Standard OBUS: Other Buses : carbon dioxide MCY: Motorcycles Abbreviations GAS: gasoline DSL: diesel 2 CO Available online at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/modeling.htm#emfac2011_web_based_data California Air Resources Board. 2011. EMission FACtors Model, 2011 (EMFAC2011). T7 utility: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Utility Fleet Truck T7 tractor: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Tractor Truck T7IS: Heavy-Heavy Duty Gasoline Truck UBUS: Urban Buses References Total Vehicle Miles per Day 205228228166166 724703692724703692243325274306306 57686868688383 138.157.15336.955.35336.955.35 9.6749.974.859.6748.572.759.6747.771.559.6749.974.859.6748.572.759.6747.771.55354.181.15454.181.15 345.668.4445.668.4145.668.45176.55176.5222.834.2222.834.2318.427.6318.427.6 145.668.4 38573857 3 Trip Length (miles) 2 Time of DayFrequency 4444 AMPMAMPMFremont AMPMAMPMAMPMAMPMAMPMBelmont/San Carlos/Redwood CityAMBelmont/San Carlos/Redwood CityPMAMPM Apple Transit Trip Routes, Frequencies, and Lengths San Francisco - Colma Express Gilroy/Morgan Hill/Blossom HillGilroy/Morgan Hill/Blossom Hill Oakland/Berkeley/AlamedaOakland/Berkeley/Alameda San Francisco - DivisaderoSan Francisco - Divisadero San Francisco - Van NessSan Francisco - Van Ness San Francisco - 19th AveSan Francisco - 19th Ave 1 Route Santa Clara/MilpitasSanta Clara/Milpitas Santa CruzSanta Cruz PleasantonPleasanton Union CityUnion City Fremont Cupertino, California COACH RUNS (50 passenger pple Campus 2 Transit Type capacity) A Total Vehicle Miles per Day 3. Trip lengths estimated from route maps using Google Earth and a conservative 50% is added to each route to account for miles 127137 24244141585862624545 312.919.35312.919.359.914.859.914.85 AM136.59.75PM146.59.755.37.955.37.95913.5913.5 313.820.7313.820.7 3 Trip Length (miles) 2. Frequency of San Francisco routes distributed evenly for the 3 sub-routes for calculation purposes. 2 Time of DayFrequency 164 333333 Cupertino population 12,750 ) AMPMAMPMAMPMAMPMAMPM 1. Routes and frequencies provided by Apple. traveled when the vehicle is not occupied. 1 ( Route TOTAL Sunnyvale CaltrainSunnyvale Caltrain San Jose CaltrainSan Jose Caltrain Mt View CaltrainMt View Caltrain Los GatosLos Gatos CampbellCampbell Los AltosLos Altos SHUTTLE RUNS Walk-ons as well - connecting to (16 passenger accomodates Transit Type transit but capacity) Notes Solid Waste Emissions Calculations pple Campus 2 A Solid Waste Emissions, Phase 1 only Determination of Solid Waste Generation Rate Commercial waste generation rate (City of Los Angeles 2006): 10.53lb waste/employee-da y Convert this value to kg/employee-year for use in subsequent calculations: InputValueData Source lb waste/employe Waste Generation e-day 10.53City of Los Angeles 2006 Rate RB 2012a (page 25 of 304 of this pdf: A Average working http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pd days/year days per year250f) 1 lb =453.592g- 1 kg =1000g- Commercial waste generation rate (City of Los Angeles 2006): 1,194kg waste/employee-yea r Determination of Diversion Rate From CalRecycle (2012): "The 2011 per employee disposal rate dropped to 11.3 pounds/employee/day resulting in a slight bump in the per employee "diversion rate equivalent" to 64% compared to 63% in 2010." Diversion rate:63%for 2010 Determination of Emission Factor Method: mass balance on carbon entering in municipal solid waste Calculate the amount of Anaerobically Degradable Carbon (ANDOC) in 1 ton of solid waste InputData SourceValue ANDOC7.7%ARB 2012b lb 1 ton =-2,000 1 lb =453.592g- 1 MT =1,000,000g- Total ANDOC in 1 ton waste: 0.070MT ANDOC/1 ton waste Calculate the amount of uncaptured ANDOC in 1 ton waste InputData SourceValue MT ANDOC/1 Total ANDOC in 1 ton ton waste waste0.070Calculated Captured portion of Landfill Gas85%ARB 2012b Uncaptured portion of Landfill Gas15%ARB 2012b Oxidized portion of carbon in the landfill cap10%ARB 2012b Unoxidized portion of carbon in the landfill cap90%ARB 2012b Uncaptured ANDOC in 1 ton waste: 9.43E-03MT uncaptured ANDOC/1 ton waste Calculate the amount of captured and uncontrolled ANDOC in 1 ton waste InputData SourceValue MT ANDOC/1 Total ANDOC in 1 ton ton waste waste0.070Calculated Captured portion of Landfill Gas85%ARB 2012b Controlled portion of captured Landfull Gas99%ARB 2012b Uncontrolled portion of captured Landfull Gas1%ARB 2012b Captured and Uncontrolled ANDOC in 1 ton waste: 5.94E-04MT captured and uncontrolled ANDOC/1 ton waste Calculate the amount of uncaptured and captured and uncontrolled ANDOC in 1 ton waste Total ANDOC available for release in 1 ton waste: 1.00E-02MT ANDOC/1 ton waste Calculate methane (CH) emissions from uncaptured and captured and uncontrolled ANDOC in carbon 4 dioxide equivalents (COe) 2 InputData Source Value Total ANDOC MT ANDOC/1 available for release ton waste in 1 ton waste0.010Calculated Portion of Landfill Gas releasted as CH50%ARB 2012b 4 ARB 2012b. Emissions of carbon dioxide (CO) are not Portion of Landfill 2 attributed to solid waste. Gas releasted as CO50% 2 100-year Global Warming Potential of IPCC 1996 g COe/g CH CH21 24 4 Molecular weight of - CH16.04g/mol 4 Molecular weight of C- 12.01g/mol e emitted from 1 ton waste: CO 2 MT COe/1 ton waste 0.141 2 Calculate the COe emission factor for solid waste 2 InputValueData Source MT COe/1 ton CH emitted from 1 2 4 waste ton wasteCalculated 0.141 lb 1 ton =2,000- 1 lb =453.592g- 1 MT =1,000,000g- COe emission factor for solid waste: 2 MT COe/tonne waste 0.155 2 Calculations for Commercial Sector Calculate COe emissions from Project solid waste disposal 2 Value InputData Source ARB 2012a (page 41 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pd Total Employees13,000employeesf) kg Waste Generation waste/employe e-year RateCity of Los Angeles 20061,194 ARB 2012a (page 25 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pd f) Days per Year250days/year Diversion Rate63%CalRecycle 2012 e Emission CO 2 FactorCalculated MT COe/tonne 0.155 2 Project 2016 Total Indirect Emissions from Solid Waste:890MT COe/year 2 References California Air Resources Board. 2012a. Air Resources Board Staff Assessment of the Apple Campus 2 Application for Environmental Leadership Development Project. June. Available online at: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf California Air Resources Board. 2012b. Email between Webster Tasat of the California Air Resources Board and Catherine Mukai of ENVIRON, 20 November 2012. California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). 2012. California's 2011 Per Capita Disposal Rate website: http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/GoalMeasure/DisposalRate/MostRecent/default.htm. Accessed 11 November 2012. City of Los Angeles. 2006. LA CEQA Thresholds Guide Section M, Public Utilities. Available online at: http://www.ci.la.ca.us/ead/programs/Thresholds/M-Public%20Utilities.pdf Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 1996. Climate Change 1995; The Science of Climate Change. Contribution of WGI to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available online at: https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B1gFp6Ioo3aka3NsaFQ3YlE3XzA Water Emissions Calculations pple Campus 2 A Water Emissions, Phase 1 only Determination of Emission Factor Excerpt of Table A4-6 of CPUC and WetCat 2010: State Average (ton CO/AF) Stage 2 Suppl0.6 y Treatment0.01 Distribution0.1 Wastewater0.1 End Use1.7 Total2.51 F = acre foot A Based on ARB 2012, exclude End Use to get the following emission factor for indirect emissions from water: CO emission factorton COAF / 0.81 22 Convert this value to MT COe/Mgal for use in subsequent calculations: 2 InputValueData Source ton CO/AF CO emission factor 0.81Calculated 2 2 1 AF =-325,851gal 1 Mgal =1,000,000gal- 1 ton =2,000lb- 1 lb =453.592g- 1 MT =1,000,000g- COe emission factor for water: 2 MT COe/Mgal 2.255 2 Calculations for Office Space Inputs to the calculation: InputData SourceValue AB900 Application (page 41 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2 Area3,3401,000 sq ft.pdf) Water Use Rate146.5gal/1,000 sq ft-dayCity of Milpitas 2009 Days per Year365days/year- AB900 Application (page 29 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2 Efficiency30%.pdf) 1 Mgal =1,000,000gal- Implementing a Public Goods Charge for Water, Table A4-6. Includes Supply, Treatment, Distribution, and e EFMT COe/MGalWastewater. Excludes End Use. CO 2.255 22 Project 2016 Office Space Indirect Emissions from Water: MT COe/year 282 2 Calculations for Landscaping Inputs to the calculation: InputData SourceValue AB900 Application (page 41 of 304 of this pdf: Permeablehttp://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2 Landscape.pdf) 5,275,000sq ft 1 acre =43,560sq ft- Area121acresENVIRON calculation Water Use Rate1,300gal/acre-dayCity of Milpitas 2009 Days per Year365days/year- AB900 Application (page 29 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2 Efficiency30%.pdf) 1 Mgal =1,000,000gal- ing a Public Goods COe EFMT COe/MGal 2.255 22 Project 2016 Landscaping Indirect Emissions from Water: MT COe/year 91 2 Project 2016 Total Indirect Emissions from Water:e/year 373MT CO 2 References California Air Resources Board. 2012. Air Resources Board Staff Assessment of the Apple Campus 2 Application for Environmental Leadership Development Project. June. Available online at: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf City of Milpitas. 2009. Water Master Plan Update. December. Available online at: http://www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/_pdfs/eng_mp_water.pdf California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and the Water Energy Team of the Climate Action Team (WetCat). 2010. Implementing a Public Goods Charge for Water. July. Available online at: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/docs/cwpu2009/0310final/v4c02a19_cwp2009.pdf Phases 1 & 2 Emissions Apple Campus 2 Total Operational Emissions Summary of Project 2016 GHG Emissions 2011 Full-Occupancy Baseline, 2016 Project Emissions, Emissions SourceARB DeterminationENVIRON MT COe/yearMT COe/year Energy23,8390 22 MT CO e/yearMT COe/year Mobile29,74436,888 22 MT COe/yearMT COe/year Solid Waste533972 22 MT COe/yearMT COe/year Water366398 22 Total54,482MT COe/year38,258MT COe/year 22 Mobile Source Emissions Calculations Apple Campus 2 Mobile Source Emissions Summary of Mobile Source Emissions 2016 Project COe Emissions Mode 2 Commute Trips21,796MT/year Non-Commute Trips6,333MT/year Visitor Trips1,857MT/year Vendor Trips2,466MT/year Transit Trips - with biodiesel4,437MT/year Total36,888MT/year Trips per Vehicle 2300221,127 Total Day 1. Employee counts are from the AB900 Application (page 38 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) 2. Single-Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) rate, Carpool rate, and Carpool Density are from the AB900 Application (page 100 of 304 of this pdf: 2. From EMFAC2011 for vehicle classes LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, and MCY, calendar year 2016, Santa Clara County. Emission factors 1. From ARB Staff Assessment (2012, pages 11 and 19 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf). Roundtrip Electric Vehicle Trips/ Emissions 21,12711.982503440.00000121,796MT/year Electric 32 Vehicle Count CO 3. Count of 300 electric vehicles during Project operation is from the AB900 Application (page 28 of 304 of this pdf: Roundtrip Trips/ MT/g 2 (people/ Emission vehicle) Density 2 Factor arpool (g/mi) 2 14,20072%10%2.22 CO C days per 2 verage Carpool working 1 year % A 2 Length % SOV 1 (mi) Trip http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf)http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) Total Vehicle 1 Trips per Employees Total Day are weighted by vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Total Vehicle Trips Calculation Emissions Calculations Commute Trips Project 2016Project 2016 ScenarioScenario Notes:Notes: 2 CO 3. From EMFAC2011 for vehicle classes LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, and MCY, calendar year 2016, Santa Clara County. Emission factors 1. Trip length is from the AB900 Application (page 104 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) Emissions 24,51432503440.0000016,333MT/year 2. From ARB Staff Assessment (2012, page of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf). 2 CO MT/g Total Vehicle 1. Derived from count of Project vehicle trips per day using 3.59 trips per day per employee and Combustion Trips per 2. Count of 300 electric vehicles during Project operation is from the AB900 Application (page Emission Engines 3 Factor 25,114300224,514 (g/mi) Day, 2 CO 28 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) days per EV Trips/ Roundtri Average working 2 year p Electric 3 Vehicle Length Count 1 (mi) Trip Total Vehicle Total Vehicle Combustion Trips per Trips per Day, All 1 Engines Vehicles Day, 14,200 employees, as described in Attachment B. are weighted by vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Total Vehicle Trips Calculation Emissions Calculations Non-Commute Trips Project 2016Project 2016 ScenarioScenario Notes:Notes: 2 CO 1. Vendor trip rate of 190 round trips per day per 4,844 employees, times 2 trips per round trip, is from the AB900 Application (page 100 4. From EMFAC2011 for vehicle classes LDA, LDT1, LDT2, MDV, and MCY, calendar year 2016, Santa Clara County. Emission factors of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf). The 2011 baseline ratio of 190 vendor trips per 4,844 2. Trip length is from the AB900 Application (page 104 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf)2. Trip length is from the AB900 Application (page 104 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) Emissions Emissions 2,8407.32603440.0000011,857MT/year1,1147.32601,1670.0000012,466MT/year 4. From EMFAC2011 for vehicle classes LHD1, LHD2, T6, and T7, calendar year 2016, Santa Clara County. Emission factors are 3. From ARB Staff Assessment (2012, page 20 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf)3. From ARB Staff Assessment (2012, page 20 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) 1. Visitor trip count per day is 10% of the employee count per day, from the AB900 Application (page 100 of 304 of this pdf: 22 COCO Apple employees, approximately 4%, is applied to the total employee count to calculate the vendor trip count. MT/gMT/g EmissionEmission 44 FactorFactor (g/mi)(g/mi) 22 http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf), times 2 trips per round trip. COCO days per days per verageverage workingworking 33 yearyear AA LengthLength 22 (mi)(mi) TripTrip Total Vehicle Total Vehicle Trips per Trips per 11 DayDay are weighted by vehicle miles traveled (VMT). weighted by vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Emissions Calculations Emissions Calculations Vendor Trips Visitor Trips Project 2016Project 2016 ScenarioScenario Notes:Notes: 22 COCO County. Emission factors are weighted by vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Includes a 15% credit for biodiesel in coaches and employee population of 12,750 used to calculate the 2011 baseline vehicle miles per day (also on page 106 of 304 of this 1. Apple Transit fuel biodiesel content, trip count per day, and length per route are from the AB900 Application (page 106 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf). For the Project, ENVIRON assumes trip Project 2016 Sum:4,437MT/year Coaches7,9972602,0070.0000014,173MT/yearShuttles8032606750.000001141MT/yearGarage shuttles7002606750.000001123MT/year frequencies scale with employee population based on the ratio of employee population to the 2011 all-Cupertino Apple 3. From EMFAC2011 for vehicle classes UBUS for coaches and OBUS for shuttles, calendar year 2016, Santa Clara Emissions 2 CO MT/g Emission 3 Factor (g/mi) 2 CO days per verage working 2 pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf). 2. From ARB Staff Assessment (2012, page 21 of 304 of this pdf: year http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf) A Total Vehicle 15%3%3% Miles per 1 Day 1 Garage shuttle biodiesel fuel content a 3% credit for biodiesel in shuttles. Emissions Calculations 1 1 Shuttle biodiesel fuel content Coach biodiesel fuel content Apple Transit Trips Project 2016 Scenario Notes: 2 CO California Air Resources Board. 2012. Air Resources Board Staff Assessment of the Apple Campus 2 Application for Environmental Leadership Development Project. June. Available online at: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf California Air Resources Board. 2011. EMission FACtors Model, 2011 (EMFAC2011). Available online at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/modeling.htm#emfac2011_web_based_data EMFAC2011: EMission FACtors model, 2011 release T6: Medium-Heavy-Duty-Trucks (14,001-33,000 lbs) LHD2: Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks (10,001-14,000 lbs) LHD1: Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks (8,501-10,000 lbs) T7: Heavy-Heavy-Duty-Trucks (33,001-60,000 lbs) LDA: Light-Duty Automobiles (Passenger Cars) MDV: Medium-Duty Trucks (5,751-8,500 lbs) LDT2: Light-Duty Trucks (3,751-5,750 lbs) ARB: (California) Air Resources Board LDT1: Light-Duty Trucks (0-3,750 lbs) AB900: (California) Assembly Bill 900 SOV: Single-Occupancy Vehicle VMT: vehicle miles traveled UBUS: Urban Buses OBUS: Other Buses : carbon dioxide MCY: Motorcycles Abbreviations MT: metric ton References mi: mile g: gram 2 CO Mobile Source Emissions Supporting Materials Apple Campus 2 Trip Generation Rates The proposed trip generation rate per employee has not changed from that submitted in the initial AB900 application, 3.59 trips per day per employee. With 14,200 employees total at the Project, the total trip generation rate is 50,978 trips per day. Table 1, below, shows the trip rate per employee and the total daily trips for the proposed Apple Campus 2, based on trip rates derived from surveys at the existing Infinite Loop campus. As discussed in its AB900 application, Apple Campus 2 trip rates on a daily basis are similar to the industry-standard Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rates for land uses with similar characteristics—single tenant office building, and research and development center. Apple Campus 2 AM peak hour and PM peak hour trip rates are lower than the ITE rates, however, indicating that travel will be more spread out over the day. Table 1. Trip Generation - Apple Campus 2 Daily Trip Rate (trips/employee-Daily Trip Rate Land UseEmployee Countday)(trips/day) Apple Campus 214,2003.5950,978 The total trip count of 50,978 trips per day has been used to adjust the daily trip counts for the 1 Trips were first divided into home-based categories used by ARB in its AB900 Determination. work (i.e., commute) and non-home-based trips. Non-home-based trips were further divided into vendor, visitor, and Apple Transit trips, with the difference being non-commute trips. The trip rates developed in this way were used with the emission factors and methodology of ARB in its AB900 Determination to calculate Project greenhouse gas emissions. 1. California Air Resources Board. 2012. Air Resources Board Staff Assessment of the Apple Campus 2 Application for Environmental Leadership Development Project. June. Available online at: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf Development of Home-Based Work and Non-Home-Based Trip Counts ropose Pd Apple Campus 2 Total Trips per DayData Source Trip type Total Trips50,978Assumes 3.59 trips per employee per day with 14,200 total employees for the Project scenario Home-Based Work Trips21,727Calculated by ENVIRON assuming employees who drive to work make one round-trip commute trip per day; this includes a 72% SOV rate and a 10% carpool rate with 2.22 people per carpool on average. Includes electric vehicle trips. Non-Home-Based Trips29,251Calculated by ENVIRON by difference between total trips and commute trips. Non-home-based trips are assumed to include non-commute, visitor, vendor, and Apple Transit trips as used in the ARB Determination. Development of Visitor, Vendor, Apple Transit, and Non-Commute Trip Counts Total Vehicle Trips per Day Trip typeData Source Total Non-Home-Based Trips29,251Calculated by ENVIRON by difference between total trips and commute trips 1 2,84010% of employee population times two trips per round Visitor Trips trip 1,114Vendor trip rate of 190 round trips per day per 4,844 1 Vendor Trips employees, times 2 trips per round trip, is from the AB900 Application (page 100 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus 2.pdf). The 2011 baseline ratio of 190 vendor trips per 4,844 Apple employees, approximately 4%, is applied to the total employee count of 14,200 to calculate the vendor trip count. 183Apple Transit trip count per day is from the AB900 1 Apple Transit Trips Application (page 106 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus 2.pdf). For the Project, ENVIRON assumes trip frequencies scale with employee population based on the ratio of employee population to the 2011 all- Cupertino Apple employee population of 12,750 used to calculate the 2011 baseline vehicle miles per day (also on page 106 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus 2.pdf). Non-Commute Trips25,114Calculated by ENVIRON by difference between total non-home-based trips and visitor, vendor, and Apple Transit trips. Includes electric vehicle trips. 1. These trip rates are determined using the methods ARB used in its Determination (available online at http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf). (grams 2 /mile) Exhaust CO Emission 344 1 2 Factor CO 1 Total Exhaust /day) Emissions 2 LDAGAS24,855,4727,42103277,748LDT2GAS8,364,5063,62401483,772MDVGAS5,585,2193,16401263,291 LDT1GAS2,619,041941039981 LDADSL82,784260026MCYGAS271,449440347 (tons CO 100110012002 2 CO /day) 2 1 Exhaust CO Emissions Starting 2 (tons CO Idling Exhaust 1 Commute, Non-Commute and Visitor Trips /day) Emissions 2 (tons CO 2 CO /day) 2 1 Exhaust CO Emissions Running Emission Factor Calculations for Calendar Year 2016 2 (tons CO Vehicle Miles (miles/day) Traveled LDT1DSL3,892LDT2DSL3,841MDVDSL7,023 Santa Clara Count 2,000pounds y 453.592grams nnual average ll model years ll speeds Fuel 2016 AAA EMFAC2011 Query Inputs Cupertino, California 2 pple Campus 2 EMFAC2011 CO Vehicle Class Calendar Yea r Conversions Model Year 1 pound = Season 1 ton = Speed Are a A 1,167 1,057 112144179531 192142379303343 225617592126302067495010 9563 00000 5005000010010000100130033103 24 00000200000000000000 020 1824 8153524710 310001241002 Vendor Trips 1,030 140375285319104139174524 191 291765454810 9263225516562125 173,875282,367 995,751342,278112,061110,830299,317154,561 17,05144,03112,64578,33411,19613,47756,28715,57273,94893,74034,86224,01625,99215,563 89,291 8,8241,430 3,8482,086 279919160527 GASGAS GASGAS DSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLDSLT7 single constructionDSLDSLDSLT7 tractor constructionDSLDSL DSLDSLDSLDSLT6 instate construction heavyDSLT6 instate construction smallDSLT7 CAIRP constructionDSL T6 CAIRP heavy T6 CAIRP small T6 instate heavy T6 instate small T6 OOS heavy T6 OOS small T7 other port T7 NNOOS T7 tractor T7 CAIRP T7 SWCV T7 NOOS T7 PublicT7 Single T6 Public T7 POAK T7 POLA T7 utility T6 utility T6 AgT7 Ag LHD1LHD1LHD2LHD2 T6TS T7IS 2,361 696 emission factors include adoptation of the Pavley I and Low Carbon Fuel Standards (LCFS) emissions standards in future years. 145 24 5005 1 0 00 Shuttle Bus Trips Transit Trips Coach Trips 145 23 31,716 51,758 5,693 GAS GAS DSL 2 Notes OBUS UBUSUBUS 1. CO T6 CAIRP small: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel CA International Registration Plan Truck with GVWR<=26000 lbs T6 CAIRP heavy: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel CA International Registration Plan Truck with GVWR>26000 lbs T6 instate construction small: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel instate construction Truck with GVWR<=26000 lbs T6 instate construction heavy: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel instate construction Truck with GVWR>26000 lbs T7 CAIRP construction: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel CA International Registration Plan Construction Truck T6 OOS small: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel Out-of-state Truck with GVWR<=26000 lbs T6 OOS heavy: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel Out-of-state Truck with GVWR>26000 lbs T6 instate small: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel instate Truck with GVWR<=26000 lbs T6 instate heavy: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel instate Truck with GVWR>26000 lbs T7 single construction: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Single Unit Construction Truck T7 CAIRP: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel CA International Registration Plan Truck T7 tractor construction: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Tractor Construction Truck T7 NNOOS: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Non-Neighboring Out-of-state Truck T7 other port: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Drayage Truck at Other Facilities T7 POLA: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Drayage Truck near South Coast T7 NOOS: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Neighboring Out-of-state Truck T7 SWCV: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Solid Waste Collection Truck T7 POAK: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Drayage Truck in Bay Area T6 Public: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel Public Fleet Truck T6 utility: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel Utility Fleet TruckT7 Public: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Public Fleet Truck T7 Single: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Single Unit Truck EMFAC2011: EMission FACtors model, 2011 release LHD2: Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks (10,001-14,000 lbs) T6 Ag: Medium-Heavy Duty Diesel Agriculture Truck LHD1: Light-Heavy-Duty Trucks (8,501-10,000 lbs) T7 Ag: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Agriculture Truck LDA: Light-Duty Automobiles (Passenger Cars) MDV: Medium-Duty Trucks (5,751-8,500 lbs) T6TS: Medium-Heavy Duty Gasoline Truck LDT2: Light-Duty Trucks (3,751-5,750 lbs) LDT1: Light-Duty Trucks (0-3,750 lbs) LCFS: Low-Carbon Fuel Standard OBUS: Other Buses : carbon dioxide MCY: Motorcycles Abbreviations GAS: gasoline DSL: diesel 2 CO Available online at: http://www.arb.ca.gov/msei/modeling.htm#emfac2011_web_based_data California Air Resources Board. 2011. EMission FACtors Model, 2011 (EMFAC2011). T7 utility: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Utility Fleet Truck T7 tractor: Heavy-Heavy Duty Diesel Tractor Truck T7IS: Heavy-Heavy Duty Gasoline Truck UBUS: Urban Buses References Total Vehicle Miles per Day 205228228166166 724703692724703692243325274306306 57686868688383 138.157.15336.955.35336.955.35 9.6749.974.859.6748.572.759.6747.771.559.6749.974.859.6748.572.759.6747.771.55354.181.15454.181.15 345.668.4445.668.4145.668.45176.55176.5222.834.2222.834.2318.427.6318.427.6 145.668.4 38573857 3 Trip Length (miles) 2 Time of DayFrequency 4444 AMPMAMPMFremont AMPMAMPMAMPMAMPMAMPMBelmont/San Carlos/Redwood CityAMBelmont/San Carlos/Redwood CityPMAMPM Apple Transit Trip Routes, Frequencies, and Lengths San Francisco - Colma Express Gilroy/Morgan Hill/Blossom HillGilroy/Morgan Hill/Blossom Hill Oakland/Berkeley/AlamedaOakland/Berkeley/Alameda San Francisco - DivisaderoSan Francisco - Divisadero San Francisco - Van NessSan Francisco - Van Ness San Francisco - 19th AveSan Francisco - 19th Ave 1 Route Santa Clara/MilpitasSanta Clara/Milpitas Santa CruzSanta Cruz PleasantonPleasanton Union CityUnion City Fremont Cupertino, California COACH RUNS (50 passenger pple Campus 2 Transit Type capacity) A Total Vehicle Miles per Day 3. Trip lengths estimated from route maps using Google Earth and a conservative 50% is added to each route to account for miles 127137 24244141585862624545 312.919.35312.919.359.914.859.914.85 AM136.59.75PM146.59.755.37.955.37.95913.5913.5 313.820.7313.820.7 3 Trip Length (miles) 2. Frequency of San Francisco routes distributed evenly for the 3 sub-routes for calculation purposes. 2 Time of DayFrequency 164 333333 Cupertino population 12,750 ) AMPMAMPMAMPMAMPMAMPM 1. Routes and frequencies provided by Apple. traveled when the vehicle is not occupied. 1 ( Route TOTAL Sunnyvale CaltrainSunnyvale Caltrain San Jose CaltrainSan Jose Caltrain Mt View CaltrainMt View Caltrain Los GatosLos Gatos CampbellCampbell Los AltosLos Altos SHUTTLE RUNS Walk-ons as well - connecting to (16 passenger accomodates Transit Type transit but capacity) Notes Solid Waste Emissions Calculations Apple Campus 2 Solid Waste Emissions Determination of Solid Waste Generation Rate Commercial waste generation rate (City of Los Angeles 2006): 10.53lb waste/employee-day Convert this value to kg/employee-year for use in subsequent calculations: InputData SourceValue lb waste/employe Waste Generation e-day Rate10.53City of Los Angeles 2006 ARB 2012a (page 25 of 304 of this pdf: Average working http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pd days/year days per year250f) 1 lb =453.592g- 1 kg =1000g- Commercial waste generation rate (City of Los Angeles 2006): 1,194kg waste/employee-year Determination of Diversion Rate From CalRecycle (2012): "The 2011 per employee disposal rate dropped to 11.3 pounds/employee/day resulting in a slight bump in the per employee "diversion rate equivalent" to 64% compared to 63% in 2010." Diversion rate:63%for 2010 Determination of Emission Factor Method: mass balance on carbon entering in municipal solid waste Calculate the amount of Anaerobically Degradable Carbon (ANDOC) in 1 ton of solid waste InputData SourceValue ANDOC7.7%ARB 2012b lb 1 ton =-2,000 1 lb =453.592g- 1 MT =1,000,000g- Total ANDOC in 1 ton waste: 0.070MT ANDOC/1 ton waste Calculate the amount of uncaptured ANDOC in 1 ton waste InputData SourceValue MT ANDOC/1 Total ANDOC in 1 ton ton waste waste0.070Calculated Captured portion of Landfill Gas85%ARB 2012b Uncaptured portion of Landfill Gas15%ARB 2012b Oxidized portion of carbon in the landfill cap10%ARB 2012b Unoxidized portion of carbon in the landfill cap90%ARB 2012b Uncaptured ANDOC in 1 ton waste: 9.43E-03MT uncaptured ANDOC/1 ton waste Calculate the amount of captured and uncontrolled ANDOC in 1 ton waste InputData SourceValue MT ANDOC/1 Total ANDOC in 1 ton ton waste waste0.070Calculated Captured portion of Landfill Gas85%ARB 2012b Controlled portion of captured Landfull Gas99%ARB 2012b Uncontrolled portion of captured Landfull Gas1%ARB 2012b Captured and Uncontrolled ANDOC in 1 ton waste: 5.94E-04MT captured and uncontrolled ANDOC/1 ton waste Calculate the amount of uncaptured and captured and uncontrolled ANDOC in 1 ton waste Total ANDOC available for release in 1 ton waste: 1.00E-02MT ANDOC/1 ton waste Calculate methane (CH) emissions from uncaptured and captured and uncontrolled ANDOC in carbon 4 dioxide equivalents (COe) 2 InputData Source Value Total ANDOC MT ANDOC/1 available for release ton waste in 1 ton waste0.010Calculated Portion of Landfill Gas releasted as CH50%ARB 2012b 4 ARB 2012b. Emissions of carbon dioxide (CO) are not Portion of Landfill 2 attributed to solid waste. Gas releasted as CO50% 2 100-year Global Warming Potential of IPCC 1996 g COe/g CH CH21 24 4 Molecular weight of - CH16.04g/mol 4 Molecular weight of C- 12.01g/mol e emitted from 1 ton waste: CO 2 MT COe/1 ton waste 0.141 2 Calculate the COe emission factor for solid waste 2 InputValueData Source MT COe/1 ton CH emitted from 1 2 4 waste ton wasteCalculated 0.141 lb 1 ton =2,000- 1 lb =453.592g- 1 MT =1,000,000g- COe emission factor for solid waste: 2 MT COe/tonne waste 0.155 2 Calculations for Commercial Sector Calculate COe emissions from Project solid waste disposal 2 Value InputData Source ARB 2012a (page 41 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pd Total Employees14,200employeesf) kg Waste Generation waste/employe e-year RateCity of Los Angeles 20061,194 ARB 2012a (page 25 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pd f) Days per Year250days/year Diversion Rate63%CalRecycle 2012 e Emission CO 2 FactorCalculated MT COe/tonne 0.155 2 Project 2016 Total Indirect Emissions from Solid Waste:972MT COe/year 2 References California Air Resources Board. 2012a. Air Resources Board Staff Assessment of the Apple Campus 2 Application for Environmental Leadership Development Project. June. Available online at: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf California Air Resources Board. 2012b. Email between Webster Tasat of the California Air Resources Board and Catherine Mukai of ENVIRON, 20 November 2012. California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). 2012. California's 2011 Per Capita Disposal Rate website: http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/LGCentral/GoalMeasure/DisposalRate/MostRecent/default.htm. Accessed 11 November 2012. City of Los Angeles. 2006. LA CEQA Thresholds Guide Section M, Public Utilities. Available online at: http://www.ci.la.ca.us/ead/programs/Thresholds/M-Public%20Utilities.pdf Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 1996. Climate Change 1995; The Science of Climate Change. Contribution of WGI to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available online at: https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B1gFp6Ioo3aka3NsaFQ3YlE3XzA Water Emissions Calculations Apple Campus 2 Water Emissions Determination of Emission Factor Excerpt of Table A4-6 of CPUC and WetCat 2010: State Average (ton CO Stage/AF) 2 Supply0.6 Treatment0.01 Distribution0.1 Wastewater0.1 End Use1.7 Total2.51 AF = acre foot Based on ARB 2012, exclude End Use to get the following emission factor for indirect emissions from water: CO emission factorton CO/AF 0.81 22 Convert this value to MT COe/Mgal for use in subsequent calculations: 2 InputValueData Source ton CO/AF CO emission factor0.81Calculated 2 2 1 AF =-325,851gal 1 Mgal =1,000,000gal- 1 ton =2,000lb- 1 lb =453.592g- 1 MT =1,000,000g- e emission factor for water: CO 2 MT COe/Mgal 2.255 2 Calculations for Office Space Inputs to the calculation: InputData SourceValue AB900 Application (page 41 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2 Area3,6401,000 sq ft.pdf) Water Use Rate146.5gal/1,000 sq ft-dayCity of Milpitas 2009 Days per Year365days/year- AB900 Application (page 29 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2 Efficiency30%.pdf) 1 Mgal =1,000,000gal- Implementing a Public Goods Charge for Water, Table A4-6. Includes Supply, Treatment, Distribution, and e EFMT COe/MGalWastewater. Excludes End Use. CO 2.255 22 Project 2016 Office Space Indirect Emissions from Water: MT COe/year 307 2 Calculations for Landscaping Inputs to the calculation: InputData SourceValue AB900 Application (page 41 of 304 of this pdf: Permeablehttp://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2 Landscape.pdf) 5,275,000sq ft 1 acre =43,560sq ft- Area121acresENVIRON calculation Water Use Rate1,300gal/acre-dayCity of Milpitas 2009 Days per Year365days/year- AB900 Application (page 29 of 304 of this pdf: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2 Efficiency30%.pdf) 1 Mgal =1,000,000gal- ing a Public Goods COe EFMT COe/MGal 2.255 22 Project 2016 Landscaping Indirect Emissions from Water: MT COe/year 91 2 Project 2016 Total Indirect Emissions from Water:e/year 398MT CO 2 References California Air Resources Board. 2012. Air Resources Board Staff Assessment of the Apple Campus 2 Application for Environmental Leadership Development Project. June. Available online at: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/ARBDeterminationAppleCampus2.pdf City of Milpitas. 2009. Water Master Plan Update. December. Available online at: http://www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/_pdfs/eng_mp_water.pdf California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and the Water Energy Team of the Climate Action Team (WetCat). 2010. Implementing a Public Goods Charge for Water. July. Available online at: http://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov/docs/cwpu2009/0310final/v4c02a19_cwp2009.pdf