CC 11-07-58
- 4 -
IX
PAYING BILLS
Moved by Councilman Lazaneo that warrants 518-521,
523-527, 529-536 and 538 be pRid; second by Pelosi and
carried 5 - O.
MEETING ADJOURNED AT 12:10 A.M, until November 7 at
8:00 P.M,
x
Respectfully submitted,
LAWRENCE K. MARTIN
Administr9tor-Clerk
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - FRIDAY, NOVE~æER 7, 1958
8: 00 P,!1,
In reviewing his previous presentation, Mr. Warburton
requested "better equity than presently provided." By this he
meant that the totê.l seÞ;er figures should be spread and divided
equally, lot by lot. The benefits conferred by the sewers are
equal, he saiã. Therefore the burden or charges should like-
wise be equal. Second he stated that the do~mstream and
surrounding areas should c01:1tribute to the trunk line si1:1ce it
does or will serve other areas.
Mr. Warburton concluded by saying that Lot 54, belonging
to Cummings himself, should be excluded from that portio1:1 of
the assessment i1:1 excess of the trunk cost,
Mr. Anderson, City Attor1:1ey, said that the legislative body
C81:1 revise or correct suchassessme1:1ts upon appeal a1:1d can confirm
or amend the figures supplementing the diagram in such manner as
it sees fit, In response to a statement of the Mayor, he said
th~t the Sanitary District has approved the acts of the City and
is now out of the picture relative to the improvement assessments
of the District, including the sewer charges. The law provides
~hat the City decide the e~uity of the levies,
Peggy L. McElligott, speaking for Kyne, took the position
that the SR1:1itarj District should pay more than the $6303.00
Üready allotted, since the main serves other areas, The City
:'.8S the power to make a contribution to the construction of the
~r0ject, she said, possibly on the basis of how much benefit
~.f "'ives solely to the subdivision in question and how much to
che general area. She questioned whether this section should
":,t purchase only a certain oapacity of the trunk line, i.e"
- 5 -
so much 8S needed for this subdivision. She said they also
bring a request to omit some of the lots from the sewer assess-
ment,
After further discussion, Councilman Sqich moved that the
City adopt a resolution confirming the proceedings including the
assessments stipulated and authorizing the Engineer to sign the
warrant; seconded by Councilman Lazaneo and carried 3 - 0;
CouncilmAn Pelosi abstained.
Miss McElligott then asked about the possibility of the
Sanitary District increasing the above named contribution and
w~ether the City could then redistribute the assessment, which
she said would reduce the amount of lien on the lands, To this
~he Council replied in negative as far as the City is concerned
but agreed that they could avail themselves of another appeal
to the Sanitary District.
Mr. Anderson introduced Resolution 107 Confirming Proceedings
And Assessm"nts, Corte Maders Eighlpnds Locsl Improvement
District, City of Cupertino, C~lifornia. Councilman Lazaneo
moved adoptioD; second by couDcilman Saich, cqrried 3 - 0;
Councilman Pelosi abstained.
Respectfully submitted,
f·'\JJ.-tnUt~ .<. ~-::
j
LAWRENCE K. MARTIN
Administrator-Clerk