Loading...
Draft Phase I ESALO CORNERSTONE . EARTH GROUP TYPE OF SERVICES LOCATION CLIENT PROJECT NUMBER DATE Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Cupertino, California David J. Powers & Associates 118-71-2 February 26, 2018 C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP Type of Services Location Client Client Address Project Number Date Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Cupertino, California David J. Powers & Associates 1871 The Alameda, Suite 200 San Jose, California 95126 118-71-2 February 26, 2018 Prepared by Stason I. Foster, P.E. Senior Project Engineer Ron L. Helm, C.E.G. Senior Principal Geologist 1259 Cakmead Parkway I Sunnyvale, CA 94085 T 408 245 4500 1 F 408 245 4620 1270 Springbrook Road, Suite 101 1 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 T 925 988 9500 1 F 925 988 9501 www.cornerstoneearth.com 0 C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP Table of Contents SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION........................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE.............................................................................................................1 1.2 BACKGROUND....................................................................................................1 1.3 SCOPE OF WORK................................................................................................3 1.4 ASSUMPTIONS....................................................................................................3 1.5 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL..................................................................3 SECTION 2: SITE DESCRIPTION..................................................................................4 2.1 LOCATION AND OWNERSHIP............................................................................4 2.2 CURRENT/PROPOSED USE OF THE PROPERTY.............................................4 2.3 SITE SETTING AND ADJOINING PROPERTY USE............................................5 SECTION 3: USER PROVIDED INFORMATION............................................................5 3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS ....................5 3.2 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE AND/OR COMMONLY KNOWN OR REASONABLY ASCERTAINABLE INFORMATION..................................................5 3.3 DOCUMENTS PROVIDED BY DAVID J. POWERS & ASSOCIATES..................6 3.3.1 Reported Site History...................................................................................6 3.3.2 Reported Hazardous Materials Use.............................................................6 SECTION 4: RECORDS REVIEW..................................................................................8 4.1 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES........................................8 4.1.1 On -Site Database Listings............................................................................8 4.1.2 Nearby Spill Incidents..................................................................................9 4.1.3 Further Review of Database Listings..........................................................9 4.2 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES....................................13 4.2.1 City and County Agency File Review........................................................13 SECTION 5: PHYSICAL SETTING...............................................................................16 5.1 RECENT USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP..............................................................16 5.2 HYDROGEOLOGY.............................................................................................16 SECTION 6: HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION.........................................................16 6.1 HISTORICAL SUMMARY OF SITE....................................................................16 6.2 HISTORICAL SUMMARY OF SITE VICINITY.....................................................17 SECTION 7: SITE RECONNAISSANCE.......................................................................17 7.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS................................................17 7.2 OBSERVATIONS................................................................................................18 7.2.1 Site Photographs........................................................................................21 SECTION 8: ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEWS ....................26 8.1 ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE / OWNER INTERVIEW ..........................26 8.2 INTERVIEWS WITH PREVIOUS OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS ........................26 SECTION 9: FINDINGS, OPINIONS AND CONCLUSIONS (WITH RECOMMENDATIONS)................................................................................................26 9.1 HISTORICAL SITE USAGE................................................................................26 9.2 CHEMICAL STORAGE AND USE......................................................................27 9.3 AGRICULTURAL USE........................................................................................27 9.4 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS................................................................28 9.5 OIL -WATER SEPARATORS AND ACID NEUTRALIZATION CHAMBER .........28 9.6 HYDRAULIC LIFTS............................................................................................29 9.7 LEAD-BASED PAINT AND TERMITE CONTROL PESTICIDES ........................29 9.8 IMPORTED SOIL................................................................................................29 Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page i 118-71-2 LC CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP 9.9 POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS WITHIN THE SITE VICINITY..... 29 9.10 GROUND WATER MONITORY WELLS...........................................................29 9.11 FACILITY CLOSURE........................................................................................30 9.12 SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN.............................................................................30 9.13 ASBESTOS CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS (ACBMS) .......................30 9.14 DATA GAPS.....................................................................................................30 9.15 DATA FAILURES..............................................................................................30 9.16 RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS............................................31 SECTION 10: LIMITATIONS........................................................................................32 FIGURE 1 - VICINITY MAP FIGURE 2 - SITE PLAN APPENDIX A - DATABASE SEARCH REPORT APPENDIX B - HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND MAPS APPENDIX C - LOCAL STREET DIRECTORY SEARCH RESULTS APPENDIX D - QUESTIONNAIRE APPENDIX E - PRIOR REPORTS Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page ii 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP Type of Services Location SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Cupertino, California This report presents the results of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) performed for the Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels in Cupertino, California (Site) as shown on Figures 1 and 2. This work was performed for David J. Powers & Associates in accordance with our January 8, 2018 Agreement (Agreement). 1.1 PURPOSE The scope of work presented in the Agreement was prepared in general accordance with ASTM E 1527-13 titled, "Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process" (ASTM Standard). The ASTM Standard is in general compliance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule titled, "Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries; Final Rule" (AAI Rule). The purpose of this Phase I ESA is to strive to identify, to the extent feasible pursuant to the scope of work presented in the Agreement, Recognized Environmental Conditions at the property. As defined by ASTM E 1527-13, the term Recognized Environmental Condition means the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. De minimis conditions are not Recognized Environmental Conditions. Cornerstone Earth Group, Inc. (Cornerstone) understands that David J. Powers & Associates is assisting the City of Cupertino in the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to study the environmental effects of potential development at the Site in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). We performed this Phase I ESA to support David J. Powers & Associates in evaluation of Recognized Environmental Conditions at the Site. This Phase I ESA is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for Recognized Environmental Conditions at the Site. 1.2 BACKGROUND The City of Cupertino is organized into 21 General Plan "Planning Areas," consisting of nine "Special Areas" and 12 "Neighborhoods." The project Site is the Vallco Shopping District Special Area (Vallco Special Area). The Site comprises approximately 70 acres, approximately 58 acres of which are developable. Most of the Site (approximately 50 acres) currently is developed with the Vallco Shopping Mall and associated parking facilities, and the remaining Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 1 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP acres are developed roadways, a 148 -room hotel (currently under construction), and a surface parking lot. The City of Cupertino is currently undertaking a community-based planning process to develop a Specific Plan for the Vallco Special Area. As defined in by state Government Code §65450, a specific plan is a tool for the systematic implementation of the general plan. It establishes a link between implementing policies of the general plan and the individual development proposal(s) in a defined area. Consistent with the adopted General Plan, the proposed Specific Plan would facilitate the development of 600,000 square feet of commercial uses, 2 million square feet of office uses, 339 hotel rooms, and 800 residential dwelling units on -Site. The Specific Plan could also include a 30 -acre green roof and 65,000 square feet of civic spaces. The civic uses could include governmental uses and community meeting space. It is envisioned that 10,000 square feet of the 65,000 square feet of civic space would be for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) lab use. The locations of the proposed land uses have not been finalized, and therefore, it is assumed that the uses could be placed anywhere within the Site. The City is considering three alternatives to the proposed Specific Plan and this report addresses the impacts of the proposed Specific Plan and Alternatives, described in the Table 1, below. Table 1. Summary of Project and Project Alternative Development Land Uses Commercial Office Hotel Residential Green Civic (square (square (rooms) (dwelling Roof Space footage) footage) units) (acres) (square feet) 65,000 (10,000 Proposed 600,000 2,000,000 339 800 30 of which Specific Plan would be for STEM lab use) Project Alternatives General Plan 65,000 Buildout with (10,000 Maximum 600,000 1,000,000 339 2,640 30 of which Residential would be Alternative for STEM lab use) Retail and Residential 600,000 0 339 4,000 0 0 Alternative Occupied/Re- Tenanted Mall 1,207,774 0 148 0 0 0 Alternative Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 2 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP It is anticipated that the Specific Plan could be constructed over 10 years. All existing improvements on -Site would be demolished. Demolition materials including concrete, asphalt, and base rock may be recycled and reused on -Site. The Site elevations would generally follow the existing topography in order to minimize grading, excavation, and reworking of the existing roadways. The maximum depth of excavation for the below -ground parking structures would be approximately 20 to 30 feet. It is anticipated that approximately 2 million cubic yards of soil would be excavated and hauled off -Site. 1.3 SCOPE OF WORK As presented in our Agreement, the scope of work performed for this Phase I ESA included the following: ■ A reconnaissance of the Site to note readily observable indications of significant hazardous materials releases to structures, soil or ground water. ■ Drive-by observation of adjoining properties to note readily apparent hazardous materials activities that have or could significantly impact the Site. ■ Acquisition and review of a regulatory agency database report of public records for the general area of the Site to evaluate potential impacts to the Site from reported contamination incidents at nearby facilities. ■ Review of readily available information on file at selected governmental agencies to help evaluate past and current Site use and hazardous materials management practices. ■ Review of readily available maps and aerial photographs to help evaluate past and current Site uses. ■ Interviews with persons reportedly knowledgeable of existing and prior Site uses. ■ Preparation of a written report summarizing our findings and recommendations. The limitations for the Phase I ESA are presented in Section 10. 1.4 ASSUMPTIONS In preparing this Phase I ESA, Cornerstone assumed that all information received from interviewed parties is true and accurate. In addition, we assumed that all records obtained by other parties, such as regulatory agency databases, maps, related documents and environmental reports prepared by others are accurate and complete. We also assumed that the boundaries of the Site, based on information provided by David J. Powers & Associates, are as shown on Figure 2. We have not independently verified the accuracy or completeness of any data received. 1.5 ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL This Phase I ESA was performed by Stason I. Foster, P.E. and Ron L. Helm, C.E.G., Environmental Professionals who meet the qualification requirements described in ASTM E 1527-13 and 40 CFR 312 § 312.10 based on professional licensing, education, training and experience to assess a property of the nature, history and setting of the Site. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 3 118-71-2 C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP SECTION 2: SITE DESCRIPTION This section describes the Site as of the date of this Phase I ESA. The location of the Site is shown on Figures 1 and 2. Tables 1 through 3 summarize general characteristics of the Site and adjoining properties. The Site is described in more detail in Section 7, based on our on -Site observations. 2.1 LOCATION AND OWNERSHIP Table 2 describes the physical location, and ownership of the property, based on information provided by David J. Powers & Associates. The Site is located in the City of Cupertino on both sides of North Wolfe Road between Vallco Parkway and Interstate 280 (1-280) on the east side and between Stevens Creek Boulevard and 1-280 on the west side. An enclosed, pedestrian bridge connects the mall buildings on the east and west sides of North Wolfe Road. Table 2. Location and Ownership Assessor's Parcel No. (APN) Address Owner Approximate Lot Size (acres) 316-20-080 10101 N. Wolfe Road, and 19621 and 19623 Stevens Creek Blvd. Vallco Property Owner, LLC 10101 N. Wolfe Road (Sand Hill Property Company) 12.58 316-20-081 3.73 316-20-088 10333 N. Wolfe Road Simeon/Wolfe Properties 5.12 316-20-092 10380 Perimeter Road KCR Development 2.12 316-20-094 10150 N. Wolfe Road 10123 N. Wolfe Road 10330 N. Wolfe Road 10123 N. Wolfe Road 10123 and 10133 N. Wolfe Road Vallco Property Owner, LLC NA (Sand Hill Property Company) 10343 N. Wolfe Road 10123 N. Wolfe Road 10123 N. Wolfe Road 10123 N. Wolfe Road 9.98 316-20-095 2.71 316-20-099 0.9 316-20-100 3.35 316-20-101 4.51 316-20-103 1.85 316-20-104 1.04 316-20-105 0.68 316-20-106 3.27 316-20-107 5.5 2.2 CURRENT/PROPOSED USE OF THE PROPERTY The current and proposed uses of the property are summarized in Table 3. Table 3. Current and Proposed Uses Current Use Vallco Shopping Mall, parking garages and at -grade parking lots, and a hotel (currently under construction). Most mall tenant spaces are vacant, except for an AMC movie theater, two restaurants (Dynasty and Benihana), Bay Club fitness center, a bowling alley (Bowlmore) and an ice skating rink Cupertino Ice Center). Proposed Use Mixed use development Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 4 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP 2.3 SITE SETTING AND ADJOINING PROPERTY USE Based on our Site vicinity reconnaissance, the surrounding land uses include residential and commercial uses to the west, 1-280 to the north (and hotel, residential, and office uses north of 1- 280), commercial, office, and residential mixed-use to the east, and commercial uses to the south. SECTION 3: USER PROVIDED INFORMATION The ASTM standard defines the User as the party seeking to use a Phase I ESA to evaluate the presence of Recognized Environmental Conditions associated with a property. For the purpose of this Phase I ESA, the User is David J. Powers & Associates. The "All Appropriate Inquiries" Final Rule (40 CFR Part 312) requires specific tasks be performed by or on behalf of the party seeking to qualify for Landowner Liability Protection under CERCLA (i.e., the User). Per the ASTM standard, if the User has information that is material to Recognized Environmental Conditions, such information should be provided to the Environmental Professional. This information includes: 1) specialized knowledge or experience of the User, 2) commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information within the local community, and 3) knowledge that the purchase price of the Site is lower than the fair market value due to contamination. A search of title records for environmental liens and activity and use limitations also is required. 3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS An environmental lien is a financial instrument that may be used to recover past environmental cleanup costs. Activity and use limitations (AULs) include other environmental encumbrances, such as institutional and engineering controls. Institutional controls (ICs) are legal or regulatory restrictions on a property's use, while engineering controls (ECs) are physical mechanisms that restrict property access or use. The regulatory agency database report described in Section 4.1 did not identify the Site as being in 1) US EPA databases that list properties subject to land use restrictions (i.e., engineering and institutional controls) or Federal Superfund Liens or 2) lists maintained by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) of properties that are subject to AULs or environmental liens where the DTSC is a lien holder. ASTM E 1527-13 categorizes the requirement to conduct a search for Environmental Liens and AULs as a User responsibility. A search of land title records for environmental liens and AULs was not within the scope of the current Phase I ESA. 3.2 SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE AND/OR COMMONLY KNOWN OR REASONABLY ASCERTAINABLE INFORMATION Based on information provided by or discussions with David J. Powers & Associates, we understand that David J. Powers & Associates does not have specialized knowledge or experience, commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information regarding the Site, or other information that is material to Recognized Environmental Conditions except for the information contained in the provided reports described in Section 3.3. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 5 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP 3.3 DOCUMENTS PROVIDED BY DAVID J. POWERS & ASSOCIATES To help evaluate the presence of Recognized Environmental Conditions at the Site, Cornerstone reviewed and relied upon the documents provided by David J. Powers & Associates listed in Table 4. Please note that Cornerstone cannot be liable for the accuracy of the information presented in these documents. ASTM E1527-13 does not require the Environmental Professional to verify independently the information provided; the Environmental Professional may rely on the information unless they have actual knowledge that certain information is incorrect. A summary of the provided documents is provided below; please refer to the original reports for complete details (Appendix E). Table 4. Documents Reviewed Date Author Title May 5, 2006 Ceres Associates (Ceres) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Update, Vallco Fashion Mall, 10123 North Wolfe Road, Cupertino, California January 7, 2014a WSP Services, Inc. (WSP) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Vallco Fashion Mall, 10123 North Wolfe Road, Cupertino, California 95014 June 26, 2014b WSP Services, Inc. Limited Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of Sears/Bay Club Facilities in the Vallco Shopping Center, Cupertino, California. January 11, 2016 WSP Services, Inc. Updated Information to the January 7, 2014 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of Vallco Mall in Cupertino, California. 3.3.1 Reported Site History Based on information contained in the provided prior reports, the Site historically was occupied by farmhouses and used for agricultural purposes since at least 1939. A Sears department store and an associated automotive center building reportedly were constructed on -Site by 1970, and the remaining Vallco mall structures were constructed between approximately 1974 and 1979. At the time of the Phase I ESA (WSP, 2014a), the shopping mall reportedly had approximately 110 tenant spaces with a vacancy rate of approximately 38 percent. Macys, Sears and JC Penney were listed as anchor tenants. Two detached on -Site buildings located north of the shopping mall were occupied by restaurants (TGI Fridays and Alexander's Steakhouse). The Mall reportedly underwent significant renovations in 1988 and 2006. In 2006, two new parking structures were constructed, additional retail stores were added along the west side of Wolfe Road, and the AMC movie theatre was added to the third level of the mail. In 2012, Sears renovated their store, and the Bay Club, a fitness facility, was established in the southeast corner of the Sears building. 3.3.2 Reported Hazardous Materials Use The various prior retail tenants and restaurants within the mall reportedly handled and stored a variety of retail materials, products, and foodstuffs unique to their places of business. WSP stated that no major quantities of chemicals or hazardous materials were stored on -Site at the time of the Phase I ESA (2014a). Landscape maintenance was noted to be performed under a contract with Petalon, and on -Site escalators and elevators were reported to be maintained under a contract with KONE. A maintenance supply room was reported to contain a flammable Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 6 118-71-2 C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP materials storage cabinet containing numerous household size containers of paint, stains, and lacquers, as well as other common maintenance supplies. The Phase I ESA (2014a) did not identify any significant staining or stressed vegetation on -Site. WSP indicated that although the Site is listed as being a RCRA small quantity generator of hazardous waste, no hazardous wastes reportedly are routinely generated at the mall. WSP stated that the listing likely resulted from previous tenants (Expressly Portraits, Fox Photo, Inc., Kits Camera, and The Picture People, Inc.) that were engaged in photo developing activities that generated hazardous waste. Chemicals for treatment of water in a whirlpool were reportedly stored on the portion of the rooftop above the Bay Club (WSP, 2014b). General solid wastes and trash reportedly are disposed in dumpsters and compactors located on -Site. Various materials are separated for recycling. The dumpsters and recyclable materials were noted to be serviced by Recology. Although the Sears Automotive Center currently is unoccupied, WSP reported that in 2014 bulk product oil was stored in aboveground contained tanks within the eastern portion of the Automotive Center building. Waste oils were contained within an aboveground storage tank (AST), and several drums of oils and lubricants within containment were stored in the same area. The Automotive Center was noted to store tires, batteries, and small quantities of retail oils and lubricants in the basement. Hydraulic lifts were reported to be present within the building, and several unidentified surface caps for access to potential below ground equipment installations were noted by WSP in the paved parking area south of the Automotive Center (these features were observed by Cornerstone to be located on the east side of the building and are further discussed in Section 7.2). Four gasoline and two motor oil underground storage tanks (USTs) reportedly were removed from the Sears Automotive Center in 1985; associated dispenser islands and product lines were removed from the Site in 1994. Additionally, a 350 -gallon diesel UST and a 350 -gallon waste oil UST at JC Penney reportedly were removed from the Site in 1989. A 750 -gallon oil -water separator at JC Penney also was closed in-place in 1994. Following various soil and ground water quality studies, and soil removal activities, the leaking underground storage tank (LUST) cases at JC Penney and Sears were closed by the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD) in 1994 and 1999, respectively. WSP (2014a) concluded that these LUST cases represent historical recognized environmental conditions (RECs), and recommended that any future subsurface disturbance in the areas of the former LUSTS at the Sears Automotive Center and the JC Penney locations should be performed with care with an awareness of the past releases in these areas. The LUST cases and the Sears Automotive Center area discussed further in subsequent sections of this Phase I ESA. WSP (2014b), which focused on the Sears property, provided a similar recommendation and stated that because of the former presence of the underground storage tanks, the hydraulic lifts currently in use, and the possibility of underground installations, any future disturbance or investigation in the area of the Sears Automotive Center (removal of the building and/or excavation) should be performed with care and an awareness of the potential for petroleum or chemical releases in these areas. WSP (2016) indicated that the Sears retail operations and Automotive Center were closed and vacated as of October 4, 2014, and that JC Penny was expected to close by April 2016. WSP (2016) recommended that the closure activities of these premises be monitored and coordinated with the Santa Clara Fire Department to ensure that no residual hazardous materials or Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 7 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP contaminants remain following closure. Any remaining ground water monitoring wells or other subsurface sumps/separators should be properly abandoned or removed as part of the closure activities. The preparation of a Soil Management Plan for all redevelopment activities was additionally recommended to provide the protocols for proper sampling, handling, and reuse or disposal of excavated soils, and screening of imported fill materials before their import or use on the property. SECTION 4: RECORDS REVIEW 4.1 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES Cornerstone conducted a review of federal, state and local regulatory agency databases provided by Environmental Data Resources (EDR) to evaluate the likelihood of contamination incidents at and near the Site. The database sources and the search distances are in general accordance with the requirements of ASTM E 1527-13. A list of the database sources reviewed, a description of the sources, and a radius map showing the location of reported facilities relative to the project Site are attached in Appendix A. The purpose of the records review was to obtain reasonably available information to help identify Recognized Environmental Conditions. Accuracy and completeness of record information varies among information sources, including government sources. Record information is often inaccurate or incomplete. The Environmental Professional is not obligated to identify mistakes or insufficiencies or review every possible record that might exist with the Site. The customary practice is to review information from standard sources that is reasonably available within reasonable time and cost constraints. 4.1.1 On -Site Database Listings Several past Site occupants were listed on various regulatory agency databases. The listings appear generally consistent with the reported history and past occupancy of the Site as summarized in Section 3.3. Sears Automotive Center and JC Penney were listed as closed LUST cases, and on other databases related to the use and storage of hazardous materials. Sears was identified on the Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System (SWEEPS) UST database, which lists seven USTs at Sears including four gasoline and two motor oil USTs, and a 1,000 gallon waste oil UST. As previously discussed, four gasoline and two motor oil USTs were removed in 1985; the 1,000 gallon waste oil UST is not discussed in the SCVWD case closure documents. Sears Automotive Center also was listed on a County database of facilities that operate ASTs; a total AST capacity of 1,800 gallons was noted. Vallco Fashion Park was listed in the California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS) database, which contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). The listing indicates that 18 gallons of non -PCB mineral oil was released to on -Site pavements and a storm drain in 1999 as a result of a traffic accident involving a PG&E vehicle that was transporting a transformer. The spill reportedly was contained and cleaned. A second CHMIRS listing indicates that 50 gallons of hydraulic fluid were released to grease traps and possible to the sanitary sewer in 2014. The spill reportedly was contained and cleaned. These incidents appear unlikely to have significantly impacted the Site. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 8 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP Macy's additionally was listed in the CHMIRS database and on the Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) database resulting from a reported 1 gallon spill of mineral oil from a failed PG&E transformer in 1999. The spill was noted to have been cleaned by the responsible party. Ceres (2006) stated that PG&E indicated that PCBs were removed from transformers in the area in the late 1970s and early 1980s. However, the ERNS listing identifies the material spilled at "Oil, Misc: Transformer (PCB: 92 ppm)." The ERNS listing additionally indicates that contaminated soil was removed. Based on the reported small volume of oil spilled and the report that impacted soil was removed, this incident appears unlikely to have significantly impacted the Site. Expressly Portraits was listed on the ERNS database resulting from a spill in 1996 of liquid waste containing silver (5 gallons) into secondary containment. This incident appears unlikely to have significantly impacted the Site. Macy's and JC Penney also were listed on the Emissions Inventory (EMI) database, which contains toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the California Air Resources Board and local air pollution agencies. These listings appear likely to have been associated with the operation of diesel fueled emergency generators at these businesses. Vallco Shopping Mall, JC Penney, Macy's, R Jacobs Group, Bath & Body Works, Ice Center Enterprises, Fox Photo, Kits Camera, Expressly Portraits and The Picture People were identified at the Site addresses on the HAZNET database, which contains data extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. Listed wastes disposed from the Site were categorized as other organic solids, laboratory waste chemicals, material containing PCBs, unspecified organic liquid mixture, latex waste, oxygenated solvents, inorganic solid waste, asbestos containing waste, unspecified alkaline solution, oil -containing waste, metal sludge and photochemical/photoprocessing waste. Kits Camera, The Picture People, Sears and Vallco Fashion Park were identified on a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) database as Small Quantity Generators (SQGs) of hazardous waste. No violations were noted. 4.1.2 Nearby Spill Incidents Based on the information presented in the agency database report, no nearby off -Site spill incidents were reported that appear likely to significantly impact soil, soil vapor or ground water beneath the Site. The potential for impact was based on our interpretation of the types of incidents, the locations of the reported incidents in relation to the Site and the assumed ground water flow direction. 4.1.3 Further Review of Database Listings To obtain additional information regarding the on -Site LUST cases at the Sears Automotive Center and JC Penney, a cursory review of readily available documents obtained from the state Geotracker (http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov) databases was performed. Geotracker is a database and geographic information system (GIS) that provides online access to environmental data. It tracks regulatory data about leaking underground storage tank (LUST), Department of Defense, Site Cleanup Program and Landfill sites. Brief summaries of the Sears Automotive Center and JC Penney LUST cases are presented below. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 9 118-71-2 C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP 4.1.3.1 JC Penney Store No. 427, 10150 Wolfe Road Two 350 gallon diesel USTs and one 500 gallon waste oil UST were previously located on -Site. The first diesel UST was used for several years and then abandoned in place in 1985 when a leak was suspected. The second diesel UST was installed adjacent to the first UST within a 4 - inch thick concrete vault in 1985. In 1989, water was observed in the second UST, and it was taken out of service. The 500 gallon waste oil UST presumably was used until 1985, when the associated JC Penney automotive maintenance facility ceased operations. The three USTs were emptied, excavated, and removed in 1989. Soil samples collected directly beneath the diesel tanks contained Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd) at concentrations up to 6,600 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Soil samples collected from beneath the waste oil UST contained TPH as oil (TPHo) at concentrations up to 1,400 mg/kg and TPH as diesel at concentrations up to 71 mg/kg. The Water Board's Tier 1 Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs)' for TPHd and TPHo are 230 mg/kg and 5,100 mg/kg, respectively. Soil removal reportedly was subsequently performed at each UST excavation. Approximately 78 tons of soil were removed from the diesel UST excavation; TPHdreportedly was not detected above laboratory reporting limits in confirmation soil samples collected after soil removal. Approximately 225 tons of soil were removed from the waste oil UST excavation; one soil sample collected at an approximate depth of 8 feet in the waste oil UST excavation contained total oil and grease (TOG) at a concentration of 3,800 mg/kg. Analyses of other confirmation soil samples collected from the waste oil tank excavation contained TOG at up to 110 mg/kg and TPHd at up to 14 mg/kg. During removal of the waste oil UST, an oil/water separator was observed along the south wall of the excavation. The oil/water separator was not removed due to concerns for the structural integrity of the nearby building. Analyses of soil samples collected below the separator reportedly did not detect TPHg, TPHd, TOG or BTEX compounds. In 1994, the 750 gallon separator was steam cleaned and closed in place by filling it with cement grout under County Fire Department oversight. A ground water monitoring well (MW -1) was installed in 1990 near the excavations. TPHd was detected at concentrations at up to 0.2 milligrams per liter (mg/L) in ground water samples collected from MW -1 in 1990; its ground water ESL is 0.1 mg/L. Three additional ground water monitoring wells (MW -2, 3 and 4) were installed later in 1990, and a ground water monitoring program was implemented between 1990 and 1993. Analyses of ground water samples collected during 1992 and 1993 typically did not detect TPHd or benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene or xylenes (BTEX) compounds at concentrations exceeding their respective laboratory reporting limits. Ground water was reported at depths between approximately 120 and 140 feet. A perched water bearing zone also was noted between depths of approximately 80 and 95 feet; this zone reportedly was not consistently encountered at the Site. In 1992, supplemental investigations were performed to evaluate soil quality relating to the removed diesel and waste oil USTs. One boring was advanced to an approximate depth of 115 feet in the vicinity of the former diesel USTs. Soil samples from various depths were analyzed 1 Environmental Screening Levels (San Francisco Bay, Regional Water Quality Control Board, February 2016) are used to screen sites for potential human health concerns where releases of hazardous chemicals to soil have occurred. ESLs are risk-based concentrations derived from standardized equations combining exposure information assumptions with toxicity data. Under most circumstances, the presence of a chemical in soil at concentrations below the corresponding screening level can be assumed not to pose a significant health risk. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 10 118-71-2 C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP for TPHd and BTEX compounds; these compounds were not detected above laboratory reporting limits. Nine borings were advanced in the vicinity of the former waste oil UST. Selected soil samples from the nine borings were analyzed for TOG, total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH), TPHd, TPH as gasoline (TPHg), and BTEX compounds. TOG was detected in soil samples at concentrations up to 4,010 mg/kg. TRPH was detected in one soil sample at a concentration of 240 mg/kg. The TOG concentrations detected were significantly higher than TRPH detections, which potentially may indicate that a large portion of the detected TOG concentrations may be caused by naturally occurring organic matter, not by the petroleum releases from the removed USTs. The SCVWD stated that it appears that the extent of soil contamination has been sufficiently defined and that contaminated soil has been effectively removed, with the exception of 3,800 mg/kg of TOG detected in the sidewall of the waste oil UST excavation. The SCVWD also stated that the residual soil contamination does not appear to pose a significant threat to ground water. The SCVWD issued a case closure letter in September 1994. The case closure letter noted that Water District Ordinance 90-1 requires that the four ground water monitoring wells be properly destroyed when they are no longer in use. 4.1.3.2 Sears Automotive Center, 10101 North Wolfe Road In 1985, two 12,000 gallon gasoline USTs, two 5,000 gallon gasoline USTs, and two 550 gallon oil USTs were removed from the Site. Soil samples were collected from the edge of the concrete UST anchoring slabs (four samples from the gasoline UST excavation and one sample from the oil UST excavation). Laboratory reports were not available within the records reviewed; however, hand written notes indicate that 4.7 and 19.6 mg/kg were detected in two soil samples from the gasoline UST excavation (14 foot depth). These concentrations presumably represent TPHg; the specific analyses conducted were not described. In October 1994, the dispenser islands, product piping and vent lines associated with the gasoline USTs were removed. Subsequent soil sampling revealed petroleum hydrocarbon contamination above laboratory reporting limits in 5 of 20 soil samples collected from the gasoline UST piping area and in 4 of 5 soil samples collected from the oil UST piping area. ■ TPHg was detected above laboratory reporting limits in 3 of 25 soil samples analyzed at concentrations ranging between 25 mg/kg and 3,000 mg/kg. The detected concentrations of TPHg exceeded the Water Board's Tier 1 ESL for TPHg (100 mg/kg) in 1 of the 25 samples (sample 2AST). Benzene was detected above laboratory reporting limits in 5 of 25 soil samples at concentrations ranging between 0.009 mg/kg and 2.4 mg/kg. The detected concentrations of benzene exceeded its residential DTSC-SL2 (0.33 mg/kg) in 1 of the 25 samples (sample 2AST). ■ TRPH was detected above laboratory reporting limits in 4 of 5 soil samples analyzed at concentrations ranging between 1 mg/kg and 1,300 mg/kg. The detected 2 BTEX concentrations were compared to screening levels established by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Human and Ecological Risk Office (HERO) (DTSC-SLs, January 2018). As recommended by the DTSC, US EPA Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) were used for analytes for which no DTSC- SLs have been established. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 11 118-71-2 C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP concentrations of TRPH do not exceeded the Water Board's Tier 1 ESL for TRPH of 5,100 mg/kg. ■ Toluene was detected in 4 of 25 soil samples at up to 16 mg/kg, which does not exceed the residential DTSC-SL (1,100 mg/kg). ■ Ethylbenzene was detected in 3 of 25 soil samples at up to 23 mg/kg. The detected concentrations of ethylbenzene exceeded its residential RSL (5.8 mg/kg) in 1 of 25 soil samples (sample 2AST). Xylenes were detected in 3 of 25 soil samples at up to 150 mg/kg, which does not exceed the residential RSL (580 mg/kg). In November 1994, approximately 4.5 cubic yards of soil reportedly was removed from the location of sample (2AST) in which the greatest concentrations of TPHg, benzene and ethylbenzene were previously reported. Analyses of a second samples collected following the soil removal work did not detect TPHg or BTEX compounds. At the request of the SCVWD, a supplemental investigation was performed in 1999 to assess the potential for ground water contamination from the removed USTs. Seven direct push borings were advanced to approximate depths of 22 to 44 feet. Soil samples were collected, and the deepest sample from each boring was submitted for laboratory analysis. Low concentrations of ethylbenzene and xylenes (below their respective residential RSLs) were detected in one soil sample; benzene, toluene, TPHg, and Methyl tert Butyl Either (MtBE)/fuel oxygenates were not detected above their respective laboratory reporting limits. Ground water was not encountered. One of the seven borings (GP -6) was advanced near the location of former sample (2AST) in which the greatest concentrations of TPHg, benzene and ethylbenzene were previously reported. These analytes were not detected in the soil sample analyzed from GP -6 collected from a depth of 22 feet. In December 1999, the SCVWD issued a case closure letter indicating that no further action related to the UST release is required. Note that the UST removal report (Blain Tech Services, 1985) and the SCVWD case closure summary (1999) indicate that the two 550 gallon USTs contained new motor oil, which also is consistent with the SWEEPS UST database listings and a building plan reviewed by Cornerstone at the County Fire Department. As discussed below in Section 4.2, the building plan depicts two adjacent 5003 gallon new oil USTs and a nearby 1,000 gallon waste oil UST. Some reports prepared subsequent to the 1985 UST removals, however, depict one of the 550 gallon USTs as having contained waste oil, which appears to be incorrect. As previously noted, the 1,000 gallon waste oil UST is not discussed in the SCVWD case closure documents. Additionally, inspection notes from October 1994 prepared by the County Fire Department indicate that two 1'/2 inch diameter oil pipes and a 3 inch diameter waste oil pipe were pressure tested and subsequently abandoned in place by filling them with concrete. These pipes presumably lead to the waste oil and two new oil USTs that were located on the west side of the building. 3 These appear to have been referenced as 550 gallons in the UST removal documents and subsequent reports. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 12 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP 4.2 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES The following additional sources of readily ascertainable public information for the Site also were reviewed during this Phase I ESA. 4.2.1 City and County Agency File Review Cornerstone requested available files pertaining to the Site at the following public agencies: the Cupertino Building Department, Santa Clara County Fire Department (FD), and the Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health (DEH). The building department files contained a very large volume of records pertaining to the Site that appeared to be related mainly to tenant improvement conducted by occupants of the mall. No records indicative of Recognized Environmental Conditions were readily apparent within the Building Department files; however, due to the large volume of records, only a cursory review was feasible within the time and budget constraints of this Phase I ESA. The information reviewed at the FD and DEH that pertains to hazardous material use and storage at the Site is summarized in Table 5. Table 5. File Review Information Agency Name Date Occupant Remarks 10101 North Wolfe Road FD 1969 Sears Auto Building plans depict several features associated with the Center auto center building including 1) two adjacent 500 gallon new oil USTs and a nearby 1,000 gallon waste oil UST located west of the building, 2) a sump pump in the southwest corner of the building's basement, 3) multiple hydraulic vehicle lifts, 4) a battery storage room with drains leading to a below ground neutralization chamber located east of the building, 5) a below ground sand and grease interceptor located east of the building, 6) grease, oil and transmission fluid distribution piping throughout the interior of the building, 7) an elevator within the southeast portion of the building, and 8) two 10HP air compressors within the northeast corner of the basement. FD 1986 Sears A contract dated June 12, 1986 between Sears, Roebuck and Company and K. E. Curtis Construction Company for the removal of a 500 gallon UST. No details regarding the contents or location of the UST were described in the contract. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 13 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP Table 5 (Continued). File Review Information Agency Name Date Occupant Remarks 10101 North Wolfe Road FD Various Sears Auto Hazardous materials inventories indicate that various Center automotive related hazardous materials were stored on -Site included oils, transmission fluid, brake fluid, antifreeze, lead - acid batteries, and refrigerants, among others. These materials were noted to be contained in drums and ASTs. Wastes generated at the site were noted to include waste oil, waste gasoline, used oil filters, used batteries, waste antifreeze, and waste from a below grade oil/water separator, among others. DEH 1991, 1993, Sears Auto Inspection reports noting multiple violations including 1999, 2003, Center unlabelled waste containers, open containers, improper 2007 and recordkeeping, improper management of lead wheel 2010 weights, lack of proper training and lack of secondary containment. The presence of an oil/water separator is noted that reportedly was connected to four floor drains within the auto service shop. A spill of hydraulic oil was noted near a dumpster on the west side of the facility in 1991. Cleanup was required. In 1999, an area of etched concrete and chemical residue from "battery acid and neutralizing" was noted outside of a service bay. FD 1996-1999 Jiffy Lube Jiffy Lube is noted to have operated within the northern portion of the auto service building between 1996 and 1999. The facility is noted to have used seven ASTs with capacities between 150 and 500 gallons for storage of motor oils, transmission fluid, antifreeze, used oil and used antifreeze. DEH 2004 and Sears Auto Chemical inventories. Listed items are generally consistent 2007 Center with FD records summarized above. FD 2012-2015 Bay Club Pool treatment chemicals (calcium hypochlorite and muriatic acid) were noted to be stored in a roof -top shed. 10333 North Wolfe Road FD 1998-2012 Macy's Permits and correspondence indicate that a diesel fueled emergency generator with a 75 gallon double walled AST was present on the building roof. DEH 2004 Macy's Hazardous waste inventory listing broken and damaged cosmetic products. DEH 2008 Macy's Inspection report noting violations including an unlabeled waste drum and lack of proper recordkeepin . DEH 2014 Macy's Hazardous waste inventory listing returned/expired cosmetic waste and fragrances. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 14 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP Table 5 (Continued). File Review Information Agency Name Date Occupant Remarks 10150 North Wolfe Road FD 1998-2012 JC Penney Inspection reports and chemical inventories document the presence of a diesel fueled emergency generator with a 25 gallon, double walled AST located on the second floor within the eastern portion of the building. Diesel also was noted to be stored within a double contained 55 -gallon drum in 1998. Refrigerants (Freon 11), cooling water treatment products (corrosion inhibitors), miscellaneous maintenance and custodial products, and paints also were noted to be present. DEH 2012 and JC Penney Chemical inventories listing diesel fuel (150 gallons), along 2016 with unspecified corrosives, aerosols, flammables, oxidizers, paints and maintenance products, among others. Waste bulbs, batteries and non -PCB ballasts were noted to be generated. 10123 North Wolfe Road FD and 1991-2016 Vallco Permits, inspection reports and chemical inventories DEH document the presence of a diesel fueled emergency generator with a 170 gallon, double walled AST located in a generator room. DEH 1992, 1993, Expressly Inspection reports indicate that the facility generated waste 1996, 1999 Portraits photo processing chemicals. Violations associated with and 2001 recordkee in , training and container labeling were noted. FD 1993-2008 Ice Chalet Chemical inventories document the presence of Freon 22 10,000 cubic feet and refrigerant oil 600 gallons). FD 1993-2001 Kits Cameras/ Chemical inventories document the presence photo Ritz Cameras/ processing chemicals (fixers, stabilizers and developers, Expressly etc.). Portraits DEH 2003 The Picture Inspection report and correspondence indicate that the People facility generated waste photo processing chemicals (705 gallons in 2003). Violations associated with recordkeeping were noted. DEH 2014 Vallco Mall Various correspondence indicate that a fire in an elevator pump room on the third floor was extinguished by sprinklers and resulted in oily water being discharged in the vicinity of the pump room and to underlying areas on the second and first floors. It was reported that no impacts to soil or storm drains occurred, and that the release was cleaned up by a restoration contractor. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 15 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP SECTION 5: PHYSICAL SETTING We reviewed readily available geologic and hydrogeologic information to evaluate the likelihood that chemicals of concern released on a nearby property could pose a significant threat to the Site and/or its intended use. 5.1 RECENT USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP A 1995 USGS 7.5 minute topographic map was reviewed to evaluate the physical setting of the Site. The Site's elevation ranges from approximately 175 to 195 feet above mean sea level; topography in the vicinity of the Site slopes downward gently to the northeast towards the San Francisco Bay. 5.2 HYDROGEOLOGY During prior studies at JC Penney, ground water was reported at depths between approximately 120 and 140 feet. A perched water bearing zone also was noted between depths of approximately 80 and 95 feet; this zone reportedly was not consistently encountered at the Site. Based on information presented in the California Geotracker database pertaining to nearby properties, ground water depths between approximately 70 and 90 feet have been reported in the Site vicinity. Regionally, ground water likely flows to the northeast. SECTION 6: HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION The objective of the review of historical use information is to develop a history of the previous uses of the Site and surrounding area in order to help identify the likelihood of past uses having led to Recognized Environmental Conditions at the property. The ASTM standard requires the identification of all obvious uses of the property from the present back to the property's first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier, using reasonably ascertainable standard historical sources. 6.1 HISTORICAL SUMMARY OF SITE The historical sources reviewed are summarized below. The results of our review of these sources are summarized in Table 6. ■ Historical Aerial Photographs: We reviewed aerial photographs dated between 1939 and 2012 obtained from EDR of Shelton, Connecticut; copies of aerial photographs reviewed are presented in Appendix B. ■ Historical Topographic Maps: We reviewed USGS 15 -minute and 7.5 -minute historical topographic maps dated 1897, 1899, 1902, 1943, 1947, 1948, 1953, 1961, 1968, 1973, 1980, 1995 and 2012; copies of historical topographic maps reviewed are presented in Appendix B. ■ Historical Fire Insurance Maps: EDR reported that the Site was not within the coverage area of fire insurance maps. ■ Local Street Directories: We reviewed city directories obtained from EDR that were researched at approximately 5 year intervals between 1927 and 2014 to obtain information pertaining to past Site occupants. In general, the occupants listed in the Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 16 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP researched city directories appear consistent with previously described Site history; listed occupants include numerous commercial/retail businesses and restaurants. The city directory summary is presented in Appendix C. Table 6. Summary of Historical Source Information for Site Date Source Comment 1899 to 1968 Topographic Small structures typical of residences or associate outbuildings maps are shown on the southeast portion of the Site. Orchards are depicted on -Site on the maps dated between 1948 and 1968. 1939, 1948, Aerial The Site is shown to be occupied mainly by orchards. What 1950, 1956, photographs appears to be a residence and several outbuildings are shown on 1963 and 1968 the southeast portion of the Site. 1973 Topographic The existing Sears retail and automotive center buildings, and the maps former associated gasoline station are depicted on -Site. 1974 Aerial The existing Sears retail and automotive center buildings, and the photograph former associated gasoline station are depicted on -Site. The remainder of the Site is shown to be occupied by orchards and row crops. 1980 to 1995 Topographic The Site appears similar to the existing conditions. maps 1981 to 2012 Aerial The Site appears generally similar to the existing conditions. The photograph addition of parking structures is apparent during the late 1980s and mid -2000s, and the mall building along the west side of Wolfe Road was expanded during the mid -2000s. 6.2 HISTORICAL SUMMARY OF SITE VICINITY Based on our review of the information described in Section 6.1, the general Site vicinity historically consisted mainly of agricultural land (orchards and row crops) with widely spaced residences. By the early 1960s, an increase in mainly residential development is apparent in the general vicinity, along with several commercial developments along major roadways, such as Stevens Creek Boulevard. By 1968, Interstate 280 was constructed adjacent to the north of the Site and Wolfe Road was constructed bisecting the Site. During subsequent decades, further increases in residential and commercial development in the vicinity are apparent. SECTION 7: SITE RECONNAISSANCE We performed a Site reconnaissance to evaluate current Site conditions and to attempt to identify Site Recognized Environmental Conditions. The results of the reconnaissance are discussed below. Additional Site observations are summarized in Table 7. Photographs of the Site are presented in Section 7.2.1. 7.1 METHODOLOGY AND LIMITING CONDITIONS To observe current Site conditions (readily observable environmental conditions indicative of a significant release of hazardous materials), Cornerstone staff Stason I. Foster, P.E. visited the Site on February 13, 2018 and was accompanied by Mr. Juan Guerrero, Maintenance Director at Vallco Shopping Mall. Mr. Guerrero indicated that he has worked at the Site since 2005. We also discussed the Site with Mr. Mike Rohde, General Manager of Vallco Shopping Mall, who indicated that he has worked at the Site since 1998. The Site reconnaissance was conducted by walking representative areas of the Site, including selected interior and exterior areas. Due Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 17 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP to the size of the property, not all building areas were observed. Our reconnaissance focused on areas where hazardous materials reportedly were used or stored and our professional judgment. These areas were selected based on information contained in regulatory agency files and past reports reviewed during this study, and information supplied by Mr. Guerrero and Mr. Rohde during our Site visit. Cornerstone staff only observed those areas that were reasonably accessible, safe, and did not require movement of equipment, materials or other objects. Physical obstructions that limited our ability to view the ground surface at the Site included the existing structures and associated paved vehicle drives and parking areas (typical of developed properties). 7.2 OBSERVATIONS At the time of our visit, the Site was developed with the Vallco Shopping Mall. Most tenant spaces within the enclosed, multi-level shopping mall were vacant, including anchor tenant buildings formerly occupied by Macy's, Sears and JC Penney. Remaining tenants were observed to include an AMC movie theater, a bowling alley (Bowlmor Lanes), an ice skating rink (Cupertino Ice Center), two restaurants (Dynasty and Benihana), and a fitness center (Bay Club). North Wolfe Road was observed to bisect the Site and an enclosed, pedestrian bridge connected the mall buildings on the east and west sides of North Wolfe Road. Several multi- level parking garages and at -grade parking lots bordered the mall structures. Two detached buildings formerly occupied by restaurants (TGI Fridays and Alexander's Steak House) were observed on the north side of the mall. A third detached structure formerly occupied by a Sears Automotive Center was observed on the southwest corner of the Site. The two parcels on the northern portion of the Site adjacent to Interstate 280 were observed to be utilized for construction storage (APN 316-20-088) and for the in progress construction of a new hotel (APN 316-20-092). These two parcels were viewed only form the parcel boundaries. Predominant areas of the Site at which hazardous materials were observed to be used/stored are summarized below: Elevators: Based on our observations and information provided by Mr. Guerrero, 20 hydraulic powered elevators are present on -Site. These include passenger and freight elevators within the mall and anchor tenant structures and associated parking garages, along with a freight elevator within the Sears Auto Center. Secondary containment pans below two freight elevators within the Sears retail and auto center facilities were observed to be nearly full of hydraulic fluid, which appeared to be a result of leaks from pump equipment. Note that only a few randomly selected, representative elevator equipment rooms were accessed during or visit. Similar conditions could be present in others. Within the equipment rooms observed, no significant spills to the concrete floor slabs were observed, and impacts to underlying soil quality appeared unlikely to be significant. Emergency Generators: Three diesel fueled emergency generators were observed on -Site. One was located on the roof of the Macy's building, one was on the second floor of the JC Penney building and the third was observed with the "Vallco generator room" on the ground floor of the mall west of Wolfe Road. Diesel ASTs were associated with each generator. No evidence of spills was readily apparent. Mechanical Equipment: HVAC equipment and related mechanical equipment (chillers, cooling towers, pumps, natural gas fueled boilers and air compressors) were observed in on -Site mechanical rooms. Water treatment chemicals, such as corrosion and scale inhibitors and Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 18 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP biocides, were observed in polyethylene containers near the mechanical equipment. Petroleum based lubricants also were present (typically in 1 -gallon and smaller containers). What appeared to be minor oil staining of the concrete surfaces below some of the equipment was observed. More significant staining on the floor and walls, and a spill (approximately 1 to 2 gallons) of what appeared to be oily water was observed on the concrete floor near refrigeration equipment at the Cupertino Ice Center. Trash Compactors: Multiple hydraulic powered trash compactors are present at the Site that have hydraulic fluid ASTs (approximately 15 gallons each). Representative compactors were observed and no significant hydraulic fluid spills were readily apparent. Pool Chemicals: At the Bay Club, pool water treatment chemicals consisting of sodium hypochlorite and muriatic acid (approximately 80 gallons in 1 -gallon containers) were observed to be stored in secondary containment bins within a stairwell leading to the building's roof access. Although the stairwell is not a proper storage location, no spills were readily apparent. The pool water treatment and natural gas fueled heating equipment, along with approximately 50 pounds of chlorine tablets were observed on the rooftop. Maintenance Storage Rooms: Various facility maintenance products, consisting mainly of paint related products and janitorial supplies were observed within maintenance rooms serving Vallco Shopping Center and the Bay Club. A metal flammable materials storage cabinet within the Vallco maintenance shop additionally contained several 5 -gallon safety cans of gasoline, lubricants and other miscellaneous maintenance products. No significant spills were readily apparent. Sears Automotive Center: The Sears Automotive Center building was observed to consist of approximately 24 vehicle service bays. Staining was observed on the concrete flooring of a former battery storage room. The previously described 1969 building plans, indicate that a floor drain within this room discharged to a below ground neutralization chamber, which was observed on the east exterior side of the building. Some of the piping that appeared to formerly distributed grease, oil and transmission fluid from storage locations to the service bays had been removed; however, portions of the piping remained along interior building walls, ceilings and within the basement. Residual lubricants within the piping were observed to be dripping onto the concrete floor slab and walls at several locations, mainly within the basement. At the former location of two air compressors within the basement, the floor slab surrounding a floor drain also was heavily stained with oil. Multiple former hydraulic lifts were observed within the service bays. The lift cylinders appeared to have been removed and the outer steel casings were filled with concrete. Some of the associated hydraulic fluid piping appeared to have been removed, while other portions of the piping remained. Most of the steel casings for the lifts extended into the basement and were anchored to the concrete floor slab of the basement. The basement, however, appeared to only be present below the southern approximately three fourths of the building. The lifts within the northern service bays likely extend into underlying soil, and associate below grade hydraulic fluid piping and reservoirs may remain. A waste oil drain was observed in the floor along the interior western wall of the building. The drain lead into the basement and an associate (capped) pipe extended horizontally through the basement wall towards the location of the 1,000 gallon waste oil UST that was depicted on the 1969 building plan. A square access cover constructed of concrete was observed at the Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 19 118-71-2 C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP building exterior, in the general vicinity of the depicted waste oil UST. The access cover could not be removed with the tools available at the time of our visit. A below ground oil/water separator (as noted on the 1969 building plan) was observed on the east side of the building. A lift station sump also was observed with the southwest corner of the basement that presumably is connected to basement floor drains and other building facilities and presumably discharges to the sanitary sewer system. JC Penney Automotive Center: Although the JC Penney Automotive Center reportedly discontinued operations in 1985, remnant features of the facility were observed including multiple, in -ground, hydraulic vehicle lifts. The lift cylinders appeared to have been removed and the outer steel casings were filled with pea gravel. Below grade ducting for an exhaust collection system also remained. Additionally, a bermed secondary containment area with a floor drain was observed. The drain appeared likely to have discharged to the oil/water separator that was closed in place in 1994. The access covers for the oil/water separator were observed nearby at the exterior of the building. An attempt was made to locate the ground water monitoring wells that were previously installed near the former JC Penney USTs; however, due to stored construction materials, the well locations were not readily apparent. Other Site Features: Electricity and natural gas fuel sources appeared to be used for building heating/cooling purposes. Potable water appeared to be supplied by the local water service provider. The buildings are connected to the publicly owned sanitary sewer system. Several sanitary sewer pump stations are present on -Site; no on -Site septic systems were observed. Several grease interceptors (associated with current and former food service facilities) also are present on -Site; these would not be expected to have significantly impacted the Site. On -Site storm water catch basins and storm water collection sumps appeared to discharge via below ground piping to the City's storm water drainage system. Several PG&E owned electrical transformer were observed on concrete pads at the Site. No evidence of transformer oil leaks was readily apparent. Table 7. Summary of Readily Observable Site Features General Observation Comments Aboveground Storage Tanks Observed as described above Agricultural Wells Not Observed Air Emission Control Systems Not Observed Boilers Observed as described above Burning Areas Not Observed Chemical Mixing Areas Not Observed Chemical Storage Areas Observed as described above Clean Rooms Not Observed Drainage Ditches Not Observed Elevators Observed as described above Emergency Generators Observed as described above Equipment Maintenance Areas Not Observed Fill Placement Not Observed Ground Water Monitoring Wells Not Observed High Power Transmission Lines Not Observed Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 20 118-71-2 C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP Table 7 (Continued). Summary of Readily Observable Site Features General Observation Comments Hoods and Ducting Not Observed Hydraulic Lifts Observed as described above Incinerator Not Observed Petroleum Pipelines Not Observed Petroleum Wells Not Observed Ponds or Streams Not Observed Railroad Lines Not Observed Row Crops or Orchards Not Observed Stockpiles of Soil or Debris Not Observed Sumps or Clarifiers Observed as described above Transformers Observed as described above Underground Storage Tanks Possible waste oil UST at Sears Automotive Center Vehicle Maintenance Areas Observed as described above Vehicle Wash Areas Not Observed Wastewater Neutralization Systems Observed as described above The comment "Not Observed" does not warrant that these features are not present on -Site; it only indicates that these features were not readily observed during the Site visit. 7.2.1 Site Photographs _W r� i00 s� Photograph 1. General exterior view of the mall Photograph 2. Interior retail space. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 21 118-71-2 C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP Photograph 3. Construction storage activities (APN 316- 20-088). Photograph 5. Elevator equipment with hydraulic fluid in drip pan. WE! Photograph 7. Interior of Cupertino Ice Center. Photograph 4. Hotel under construction (APN 316- 20-092). 11 Photograph 6 generators. . One of three on -Site emergency Photograph 8. Refrigeration equipment at Cupertino Ice Center. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 22 118-71-2 C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP Photograph 11. Oily water on floor of mechanical room at Photograph 12. Typical trash compactor and Cupertino Ice Center. associated hydraulic fluid AST. Photograph 13. Pool chemicals stored in stairwell at Bay Photograph 14. Vallco facility maintenance storage Club. room. Photograph 15. Sears Automotive Center (SAC) building. Photograph 16. Interior of SAC building. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 23 118-71-2 C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP Photograph 17. Staining on floor of battery room at SAC ---------- Photograph --1Photograph 19. Remnant distribution piping and staining on floor in basement at SAC. 1 1 ! '.`� r 114,',,' Photograph 21. Waste oil drain in floor slab, capped drain Photograph 22. Remnant hydraulic lift piping pipe in wall and wall staining in basement at SAC. (unpainted) in basement at SAC. 4M Photograph 18. Former hydraulic lifts (filled with concrete) at SAC. Woe LIA i Photograph 20. Staining on floor near drain at former compressor location in basement at SAC. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels 118-71-2 Page 24 C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP Photograph 23. Concrete access cover (near storm drain) at the suspected waste oil UST location at SAC. Photograph 25. Steel covers to oil/water separator at SAC. Photograph 27. Former hydraulic lift filled with pea gravel at JC Penney. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels 118-71-2 Photograph 24. Steel cover of acid neutralization chamber adjacent to battery room at SAC. Photograph 26. Former auto service area at JC Penney. Photograph 28. Secondary containment area at JC Penney. Page 25 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP SECTION 8: ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEWS 8.1 ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE / OWNER INTERVIEW To help obtain information on current and historical Site use and use/storage of hazardous materials on -Site, we provided environmental questionnaires to each of the three property owners. A competed questionnaire was obtained from Simeon/Wolfe Properties pertaining to parcel APN 316-20-088; a copy is attached in Appendix D. Based on our review of the completed questionnaire, Wolfe Properties LLC purchased the parcel in 2012. It reportedly was historically used as an overflow parking lot associated with Vallco Shopping Mall. Since 2015, Apple, Inc. reportedly has been using the parcel for construction storage purposes. No information indicative of Recognized Environmental Conditions was noted. A completed questionnaire was not received from KCR Development pertaining to APN 316-20-092. Based on other data reviewed by Cornerstone, the parcel owned by KCR historically was used for agricultural purposes and subsequently used as an overflow parking lot associated with Vallco Shopping Mall (similar to the Simeon/Wolfe Properties parcel). Sand Hill Property Company did not complete the provided questionnaire; however, they referred Cornerstone to the previously completed reports listed in Table 3 and provided copies of each. They also provided access to the Site and contact information for Mr. Mike Rohde, General Manager of Vallco Shopping Mall, who was briefly interviewed during our Site visit. 8.2 INTERVIEWS WITH PREVIOUS OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS Contact information for previous Site owners and occupants was not provided to us. Therefore, interviews with previous Site owners and occupants could not be performed. SECTION 9: FINDINGS, OPINIONS AND CONCLUSIONS (WITH RECOMMENDATIONS) Cornerstone performed this Phase I ESA in general accordance with ASTM E1527-13 to support David J. Powers & Associates in evaluation of Recognized Environmental Conditions. Our findings, opinions and conclusions are summarized below. 9.1 HISTORICAL SITE USAGE Based on the information obtained during this study, the Site historically was used for agricultural purposes (orchards and row crops), and what appears to have been a residence with several associated outbuildings were present on the southeast portion of the Site. A Sears retail store and a separate automotive center building, with an associated gasoline station, were constructed on -Site in approximately 1970. The other currently existing Vallco mall structures were constructed between approximately 1974 and 1979, and include structures formerly occupied by other anchor tenants (Macys and JC Penney) and two detached on -Site buildings located north of the shopping mall that were occupied by restaurants (TGI Fridays and Alexander's Steakhouse). JC Penney operated an automotive repair facility on the eastern side of their building until approximately 1985. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 26 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP 9.2 CHEMICAL STORAGE AND USE Prior hazardous materials use and storage at the Site was predominantly associated with the Sears Automotive Center and the JC Penney Automotive Center. These facilities stored a variety of automotive related hazardous materials USTs, ASTs, drums and smaller containers. Both facilities currently are vacant. Past photo -related mall tenants (e.g., Expressly Portraits, Fox Photo, Inc., Kits Camera, and The Picture People, Inc.) were engaged in photo developing activities that utilized photoprocessing chemicals and generated associated hazardous waste. Hydraulic fluid is used on -Site within elevator equipment and trash compactors. Diesel fuel is stored in ASTs associated with three on -Site emergency generators. Pool water treatment chemical are used at the Bay Club fitness center. Other water treatment chemicals, such as corrosion and scale inhibitors and biocides, are used in the operation of HVAC equipment. Various facility maintenance products, consisting mainly of paint related products and janitorial supplies, also are used and stored on -Site. At the Sears Automotive Center, remnant piping that appears to have formerly distributed grease, oil and transmission fluid from storage locations to the service bays remains along interior building walls, ceilings and within the basement. Residual lubricants within the piping were observed to be dripping onto the concrete floor slab and walls at several locations, mainly within the basement. Also, at the former location of two air compressors with the basement, the floor slab surrounding a floor drain also was heavily stained with oil. Staining also was observed on the floor of a former battery storage room. We recommend that the observed piping be properly removed and disposed, and that stains and residual oil be cleaned from the interior building surfaces. This work should be coordinated with the Santa Clara County Fire Department. Near refrigeration equipment at the Cupertino Ice Center, oil staining and a spill (approximately 1 to 2 gallons) of what appeared to be oily water on the concrete floor slab also were observed. We recommend that the observed staining and spilled oil be cleaned. The staining and spilled oil on concrete flooring at the Sears Automotive Center and the Cupertino Ice Center appeared unlikely to have significantly impacted underlying soil quality. However, when these facilities are demolished, we recommend that an Environmental Professional be present to observe underlying soil for evidence of potential impacts and, if observed, collect soil samples for laboratory analyses. 9.3 AGRICULTURAL USE The Site was used for agricultural purposes for several decades. Pesticides may have been applied to crops in the normal course of farming operations. Residual pesticide concentrations may remain in on -Site soil. If elevated concentrations of agricultural chemicals are present, mitigation or soil management measures may be required during construction/earthwork activities. We recommend performing soil sampling to evaluate if agricultural chemicals are present. The sampling should focus of former orchard and row crop areas, as well as in the vicinity of outbuilding (barns and sheds) that were formerly located of the southeast portion of the Site; pesticides and/or pesticide application equipment commonly were stored in such outbuildings. Testing for lead contamination also shall be completed at the former structure locations. The sampling, which shall follow commonly accepted environmental protocols, shall be performed prior to soil excavation activities in order to appropriately profile the soil for off - haul to a disposal/accepting facility. The analytical data shall be compared to either residential Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 27 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP screening levels and/or the specific acceptance criteria of the accepting facility. If this soil is planned to be reused on-site, it shall be compared to residential screening levels and/or natural background levels of metals. 9.4 UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS Two 350 gallon diesel USTs and one 500 gallon waste oil UST were previously located near the JC Penney Automotive Center and were removed in 1989. Two 12,000 gallon gasoline USTs, two 5,000 gallon gasoline USTs, and two 550 gallon oil USTs were removed from the Sears Automotive Center in 1985. As summarized in Section 4.1.3, soil and ground water quality studies and soil removal activities subsequently were conducted at these facilities. The SCVWD issued case closure letters to JC Penney and Sears in 1994 and 1999, respectively. Residual petroleum hydrocarbons remain in place near the former USTs; however, the reported residual contaminant concentrations generally do not exceed the Water Board's current Tier 1 ESLs or residential screening levels established by the DTSC and US EPA. Thus, the residual contaminants do not appear to pose a significant risk to current or future Site occupants. A building plan from 1969 for the Sears Automotive Center that was reviewed by Cornerstone depicts a 1,000 gallon waste oil UST on the west side of the building. Similarly, the SWEEPS UST database lists seven USTs at Sears (the six USTs that were removed in 1985, and the 1,000 gallon waste oil UST). No records pertaining to the removal of a 1,000 gallon waste oil UST were identified during this study. During our Site visit, an access cover was observed in the pavement in the vicinity of the waste oil UST depicted on the 1969 building plan. Thus, it appears that a waste oil UST may remain on -Site. We recommend that the potential presence of a waste oil UST be further investigation by removing the access cover and, if uncertainty remains, the subsequent performance of a geophysical survey. If a UST is identified, it should be removed in coordination with the Santa Clara County Fire Department and DEH, and underlying soil quality should be evaluated. If no UST is identified, soil quality at the location of the waste oil UST, as depicted on the 1969 building plan, should be evaluated via the collection of soil samples from borings for laboratory analyses. Fire Department records contained a contract dated June 12, 1986 between Sears, Roebuck and Company and K.E. Curtis Construction Company for the removal of a 500 gallon UST. No details regarding the contents or location of the UST were described in the contract, and no other records pertaining to a UST removal at Sears in 1986, or later, were identified during this study. It appears plausible that this contract was for the removal of the waste oil UST discussed above (if the UST is no longer present). Alternatively, a different undocumented UST may have been removed from the Site. 9.5 OIL -WATER SEPARATORS AND ACID NEUTRALIZATION CHAMBER At the Sears Automotive Center, an oil -water separator (connected to floor drains within the building) and an acid neutralization chamber (connected to drains within a former battery storage room) were identified during this study. We recommend that these below ground features be cleaned and removed. This work should be coordinated with the Santa Clara County Fire Department and DEH. Soil quality below each of the structures should be evaluated via sampling and laboratory analyses. In 1994, the 750 gallon oil -water separator at the JC Penny Automotive Center was steam cleaned and closed in place by filling it with cement grout under County Fire Department oversight. Based on reported soil sampling data, this separator does not appear to have Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 28 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP significantly impacted underlying soil quality. However, it likely will require removal and appropriate disposal during redevelopment activities. 9.6 HYDRAULIC LIFTS Multiple former hydraulic lifts were observed with the service bays at the Sears and JC Penny Automotive Centers. The inner lift cylinders appeared to have been removed and the outer steel casings were filled with concrete (at Sears) and pea gravel (at JC Penney). We recommend that each of the below ground lift casings and any associated hydraulic fluid piping and reservoirs be removed and properly disposed. An Environmental Professional should be retained to observe the removal activities and, if evidence of leakage is identified, soil sampling and laboratory analyses should be conducted. 9.7 LEAD-BASED PAINT AND TERMITE CONTROL PESTICIDES The Consumer Product Safety Commission banned the use of lead as an additive in paint in 1978. Based on the age of the building(s), lead-based paint may be present. The removal of lead-based paint is not required prior to building demolition if the paint is bonded to the building materials. However, if the lead-based paint is flaking, peeling, or blistering, it should be removed prior to demolition. In either case, applicable OSHA regulations must be followed; these include requirements for worker training, air monitoring and dust control, among others. Any debris containing lead must be disposed appropriately. Additionally, soil adjacent to structures that are painted with lead -containing paint can become impacted with lead as a result of the weathering and/or peeling of painted surfaces. Soil near wood framed structures also can be impacted by pesticides historically used to control termites. Lead and/or pesticides often are identified in soil near old residences and associated outbuildings, such as those historically located on the southeast portion of the Site. Prior to redevelopment of the Site, we recommend that shallow soil at the former structure locations be evaluated for the possible presence of lead and pesticides. 9.8 IMPORTED SOIL If the planned development will require importing soil for Site grading, we recommend documenting the source and quality of imported soil. The DTSC's Clean Fill Advisory (2001) provides useful guidance on evaluating imported fill. 9.9 POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS WITHIN THE SITE VICINITY Based on the information obtained during this study, no hazardous material spill incidents have been reported in the Site vicinity that would be likely to significantly impact the Site. However, as is typical to many commercial areas, several facilities in the vicinity were reported as hazardous materials users. If leaks or spills occur at these facilities, contamination could impact the Site, depending upon the location of the property, the magnitude of the release, and the effectiveness of cleanup efforts. 9.10 GROUND WATER MONITORY WELLS In 1990, four ground water monitoring wells were installed on -Site to evaluate potential impacted from the former USTs at JC Penney. No records pertaining to the current status of these wells were identified during this study. Due to stored construction materials, the reported Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 29 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP well locations were not accessible at the time of our visit; one location appears to be below the parking garage constructed to the south of the JC Penney building. Prior to redevelopment of the Site, these wells should be properly destroyed in accordance with SCVWD Ordinance 90-1. 9.11 FACILITY CLOSURE As part of the facility closure process for occupants that use and/or store hazardous materials, the Santa Clara County Fire Department and DEH typically require that a closure plan be submitted by the occupant that describes required closure activities, such as removal of remaining hazardous materials, cleaning of hazardous material handling equipment, decontamination of building surfaces, and waste disposal practices, among others. We recommend that facility closure be coordinated with the Fire Department and DEH to ensure that required closure activities are completed prior to redevelopment of the Site. 9.12 SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN We recommend preparing a Site Management Plan (SMP) and Health and Safety Plan (HSP) for the proposed demolition and redevelopment activities. The purpose of these documents will be to establish appropriate management practices for handling impacted soil, soil vapor and ground water or other materials that may potentially be encountered during construction activities, especially in areas of former hazardous materials storage and use, and the profiling of soil planned for off -Site disposal. The Site Management Plan should document former and suspect UST locations, hazardous materials transfer lines, oil -water separators, neutralization chambers, and hydraulic lifts, etc. The SMP also would provide the protocols for accepting imported fill materials. 9.13 ASBESTOS CONTAINING BUILDING MATERIALS (ACBMS) Due to the age of the on -Site structure(s), building materials may contain asbestos. Because demolition is planned, an asbestos survey is required by local authorities and/or National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) guidelines. NESHAP guidelines require the removal of potentially friable ACBMs prior to building demolition or renovation that may disturb the ACBM. 9.14 DATA GAPS ASTM Standard Designation E 1527-13 requires the Environmental Professional to comment on significant data gaps that affect our ability to identify Recognized Environmental Conditions. A data gap is a lack of or inability to obtain information required by ASTM Standard Designation E 1527-13 despite good faith efforts by the Environmental Professional to gather such information. A data gap by itself is not inherently significant; it only becomes significant if it raises reasonable concerns. No significant data gaps were identified during this Phase I ESA. 9.15 DATA FAILURES As described by ASTM Standard Designation E 1527-13, a data failure occurs when all of the standard historical sources that are reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful have been reviewed and yet the historical research objectives have not been met. Data failures are not uncommon when attempting to identify the use of a Site at five year intervals back to the first use or to 1940 (whichever is earlier). ASTM Standard Designation E 1527-13 requires the Environmental Professional to comment on the significance of data failures and whether the Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 30 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP data failure affects our ability to identify Recognized Environmental Conditions. A data failure by itself is not inherently significant; it only becomes significant if it raises reasonable concerns. No significant data failures were identified during this Phase I ESA. 9.16 RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS Cornerstone has performed a Phase I ESA in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E 1527-13. This assessment identified the following Recognized Environmental Conditions'. ■ Documents reviewed during this study, as well as observations at the Site, indicate that a 1,000 gallon waste oil UST may be present on the west side of the Sears Automotive Center building. No documents pertaining to the removal of this UST or the evaluation of soil quality at the UST location were identified. There is a potential that this UST, if present, may have impacted soil, soil vapor and/or ground water at the Site. ■ An oil -water separator (connected to floor drains within the building) and an acid neutralization chamber (connected to drains within a former battery storage room) were identified during this study on the east side of the Sears Automotive Center building. There is a potential that these features may have impacted soil, soil vapor and/or ground water at the Site. ■ Vehicle lift components (e.g., outer lift cylinder casings and possibly associated hydraulic fluid piping and reservoirs) remain in ground at the JC Penney Automotive Center and within the northern portion of the Sears Automotive Center that is not underlain by the basement. There is a potential that these features may have impacted soil and/or ground water at the Site. ■ In 1986, Sears, Roebuck and Company established a contract with K.E. Curtis Construction Company for the removal of a 500 gallon UST. No details regarding the contents or location of the UST were described in the contract, and no other records pertaining to a UST removal at Sears in 1986, or later, were identified. There is a potential that this unidentified UST may have impacted soil, soil vapor and/or ground water at the Site. The Site historically was used for agricultural purposes. There is a potential that residual pesticides could remain in Site soil. If present, this soil may require appropriate management. Soil adjacent to structures that are painted with lead -containing paint can become impacted with lead as a result of the weathering and/or peeling of painted surfaces. Soil near wood framed structures also can be impacted by pesticides historically used to control termites. There is a potential that residual lead and pesticide concentrations could remain in on -Site soil resulting from the prior residence and outbuildings previously located on the southeast portion of the Site. 4 The presence or likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products on the Site: 1) due to any release to the environment; 2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or 3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 31 118-71-2 P. C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP This assessment identified the following Historical Recognized Environmental Conditions5: Two 350 gallon diesel USTs and one 500 gallon waste oil UST were previously located near the JC Penney Automotive Center and were removed in 1989. Two 12,000 gallon gasoline USTs, two 5,000 gallon gasoline USTs, and two 550 gallon oil USTs were removed from the Sears Automotive Center in 1985. The SCVWD issued case closure letters to JC Penney and Sears in 1994 and 1999, respectively, indicating that no further work was required. Within the Sears Automotive Center building, remnant piping is present that appears to have formerly distributed grease, oil and transmission fluid from storage locations to the service bays and hydraulic fluid to vehicle lifts. Residual spilled oil and staining is present on the concrete floor slabs and walls of the building, mainly within the basement. Near refrigeration equipment at the Cupertino Ice Center, oil staining and a spill (approximately 1 to 2 gallons) of what appeared to be oily water on the concrete floor slab also were observed. The staining and spilled oil on concrete floors and walls at the Sears Automotive Center and the Cupertino Ice Center appeared unlikely to have significantly impacted underlying soil quality; thus, we do not categorize these observations as Recognized Environmental Conditions. As noted in ASTM E 1527-13, the term Recognized Environmental Condition is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a significant threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. We recommend, however, that the observed staining and spilled oil be cleaned, and that the remnant piping be properly removed and disposed. Additionally, when these facilities are demolished, we recommend that an Environmental Professional be present to observe underlying soil for evidence of potential impacts and, if observed, collect soil samples for laboratory analyses. SECTION 10: LIMITATIONS Cornerstone performed this Phase I ESA to support David J. Powers & Associates in evaluation of Recognized Environmental Conditions associated with the Site. David J. Powers & Associates understands that no Phase I ESA can wholly eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for Recognized Environmental Conditions to be present at the Site. This Phase I ESA is intended to reduce, but not eliminate, uncertainty regarding the potential for Recognized Environmental Conditions. David J. Powers & Associates understands that the extent of information obtained is based on the reasonable limits of time and budgetary constraints. Findings, opinions, conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on readily available information, conditions readily observed at the time of the Site visit, and/or information readily identified by the interviews and/or the records review process. Phase I ESAs are inherently limited because findings are developed based on information obtained from a non -intrusive Site evaluation. Cornerstone does not accept liability for deficiencies, errors, or misstatements that have resulted from inaccuracies in the publicly available information or from interviews of persons knowledgeable of Site use. In addition, publicly available information and field observations often cannot affirm the presence of Recognized Environmental Conditions; there is a possibility that such conditions exist. If a greater degree of confidence is desired, soil, ground water, soil vapor and/or air samples should be collected by Cornerstone and analyzed 5 A past Recognized Environmental Condition that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory agency or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by the applicable regulatory agency without subjecting the Site to required controls or restrictions. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 32 118-71-2 C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP by a state -certified laboratory to establish a more reliable assessment of environmental conditions. Cornerstone acquired an environmental database of selected publicly available information for the general area of the Site. Cornerstone cannot verify the accuracy or completeness of the database report, nor is Cornerstone obligated to identify mistakes or insufficiencies in the information provided (ASTM E 1527-13, Section 8.1.3). Due to inadequate address information, the environmental database may have mapped several facilities inaccurately or could not map the facilities. Releases from these facilities, if nearby, could impact the Site. David J. Powers & Associates may have provided Cornerstone environmental documents prepared by others. David J. Powers & Associates understands that Cornerstone reviewed and relied on the information presented in these reports and cannot be responsible for their accuracy. This report, an instrument of professional service, was prepared for the sole use of David J. Powers & Associates and may not be reproduced or distributed without written authorization from Cornerstone. It is valid for 180 days. An electronic transmission of this report may also have been issued. While Cornerstone has taken precautions to produce a complete and secure electronic transmission, please check the electronic transmission against the hard copy version for conformity. Cornerstone makes no warranty, expressed or implied, except that our services have been performed in accordance with the environmental principles generally accepted at this time and location. Vallco Special Area Specific Plan Parcels Page 33 118-71-2 C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP APPENDIX A- DATABASE SEARCH REPORT C CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP APPENDIX B - HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS LC CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP APPENDIX C - LOCAL STREET DIRECTORY SEARCH RESULTS LC CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP APPENDIX D - QUESTIONNAIRE LC CORNERSTONE EARTH GROUP APPENDIX E - PRIOR REPORTS