CC 06-02-69
CITY Ol' CUPERTINO, State of California
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California
Phone: 252-4505
95014
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL HELD
JUNE 2, 1969 IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CUPERTINO, CALIF.
The meeting was called to order at 8:00 p.m. by Mayor Dempster, who
subsequently led the assemblage in the flag salute.
Councilmen present: Beaven, Fitzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster. Also
present: City Manager Storm; City Attorney Anderson; City Clerk -
Finance Director Ryder; Director of Public Works Yarborough; Senior
Planner Laurin; Assistant Planner Eng; Chief Building Inspector
Benevich; Director of Parks and Recreation Parham; Recording Secretary
Lucie M. Matzley.
Councilman Stokes moved, Councilman Noel seconded and it was passed
unanimously to approve the minutes of May 19, 1969 as submitted.
The minutes of the adjourned regular meeting of May 26, 1969 were
approved as printed upon the motion by Councilman Stokes and the
second by Councilman Fitzgerald.
Mayor Dempster introduced and welcomed a group of students from DeAnza
College enrolled in Political Science courses and asked that they
return at any time.
CC-15
call to order
flag salute
roll call
minutes
approved
approval of
minutes
City Clerk Ryder advised the Councilmen that he was in receipt of one
written communication from the California Water Services Company stating
that they have filed an application for a rate increase of about ~ in written
order to offset increases in the cost and amount of water purchased communication
from the Santa Clara County Flood Control and Water District.
Councilman Noel moved, Councilman Fitzgerald sEconded and it was passed
unanimously to file the communication.
When Mayor Dempster called for audience comments, Mrs. Anne Anger reported
that trucks and heavy equipment are using the streets of Monta Vista in
order to serve subdivisions. Mrs. Anger asked who would be responsible
for the repair to the streets. Mayor Dempster advised Mrs. Anger that
this was located in the County and thus not a City matter but that the
City Manager would look into the matter.
oral
Mr. Robert Zimmer of 920 Rockefeller Drive told the Councilmen that he cCmIDunications
was desirous of resubmitting a request for the division of a piece of
property, action on which had been held in abeyance pending the'formation
of an improvement district. Since the improvement district had not I
materialized, Mr. Zimmer asked for directives as to the necessary proce-
dures to follow. Mayor Dempster advised the applicant to make application
with the Planning Department for a necessary lot split so that his request
could be considered on its own merits apart from any improvement district
considerations.
page 2
planning
3-v-69
approved
1O-TM-69
approved
h control B.
Minutes of the City COUIlcíl meeting June 2, 1969
CC-15
Report of Commissions
A.
Planning Commissi.on
Planning Commission Chairman Hirshon presented the minutes of May 26, 1969
and briefly explained the acti.ons taken on Application 3-v-69. Counci.lman
Fitzgerald moved, Councilman Stokes seconded and it was passed unanimously
to approve the application.
Application lO-TM-69 was also briefly discussed. Councilman Stokes moved
for approval, Councilman Noel seconded and it was passed unanimously.
Architecture and Si.te Approval Committee
H Control Chairman Small presented the minutes of May 28, 1969 and commented
on the actions taken.
Applications 414-HC-69, 415-HC-69, 416-HC-69 and 417-HC-69 were approved
approvals upon the individual motions by Councilman Stokes and the individual seconds
by Councilman Noel, all of which were passed unanimously.
404-HC-69
approved
418-HC-69
approved
motion
withdrawn
Mr. Jack Taylor of Sutter Hill Development presented application 4a4-HC-69
pointing out the landscaping on the perimeter of the site fronting on
Homestead Road and Stelling Road and explaining that all plans had been
submitted to the Planning Commission who had found them to be in conformance
to the Ordinance.
Councilman Stokes felt that ·the proposed landscaping was at an absolute minimum
and queried if the Council might wish to consider a reduction of sidewalk by
5' adding this space to the landscaping area as five feet of landscaping was,
in his opinion, insufficient agai.nst a background of 200 t of asphalt. Mr.
Stokes further felt that the perimeter driveway was in excess of what was
required for diagonal parking and another 5' should be taken off that to
provide for e 15' landscape area.
The applicant stated that they would conform to whatever reasonable requirements
the Council would place against the application but voiced his opinion that
a request for l5' of landscaping was excessive. Councilman Stokes di.sagreed
citing examples of Vallco Park, Sears and Payless where the landscaping area
is wider still.
Councilman Stokes moved for approval of Application 404-HC-69 with a 15'
perimeter landscaping with the sidewalk to be reduced to five feet. Council-
man Fi.tzgerald seconded, and it was passed unanimously.
Mr. Burt Avery presented Application 418-HC-69 and explained the proposal
by the use of visual aids. Councilman Stokes moved for approval, Councilman
Noel seconded and it was passed unanimously.
Application 409-HC-69 was briefly discussed. Councilman Stokes moved for
approval with the same conditions as placed against Application 404-HC-69.
Councilman Fitzgerald seconded. Mr. Jack Bertnick of Gulf Oil Company
asked for a clarification of the imposed requirements and emphasized that
the landscaping area had previously been increased. Councilman Fitzgerald
withdrew his second, Councilman Stokes withdrew his motion.
Minutes of the City Council June 2, 1969
CC-15
page 3
H Control minutes cent'd
Councilman Stokes moved for approval of Application 409-HC-69 with a
lO' perimeter landscaping, the sidewalk to be reduced to 5' and the
landscaping at the radius point to be a reversed curve of fifteen
feet depth. Councilman Fitzgerald seconded and it was passed unani-
mously.
409-HC-69
approved
Mayor Dempster drew attention to the fact that the sign portion of
Application 404-HC-69 for Albertsons Shopping Center had not been
discussed. The Chief Building Inspector explained the proposal and
the allowable sign coverage. It was the consensus that the applicant
needed to consult his tenants in connection with the proposed erection
of sign towers and the identification each tenant might require, and
to obtain an agreement which would be binding on both the applicant
and the City of Cupertino.
Councilman Fitzgerald moved to continue the discussions of the sign
portion of Application 404-HC-69, Councilman Noel seconded and it was
passed unanimously.
404-HC-69
sign portion
continued
C.
Parks and Recreation Commission
parks
There had been no meeting of the Commission, there were no minutes.
Public Hearings
A.
Request for Los Altos Garbage Company for a rate increase
garbage rates
Mr. Marshal Frazier appeared on behalf of the Los Altos Garbage Company
and elaborated on a previously submitted report which indicated the
necessity for a rate increase and the reasons therefor. Mr. Frazier
also emphasized that a ten year contract had been signed between the
Garbage Company and the City of Cupertino in 1964 and that he was not
attempting to re-negotiate the contract at this point, merely to ask
approval of a rate increase averaging about ~ per year from $1.75 to
$2.40 per month.
When Mayor Dempster called for audience comments, Messrs. Bernard Ponsegi,
Howard McLaughlin, Harold Johnson, Dean Sayer, Earl Pelt and Bruce I
Wenniger voiced such considerations as the justification for the increase,
the necessity for a trash and rubbish pick-up three or four times a year,
the possibility of making special arrangements for unlimited service for
a specified fee and the possibility that Cupertino might be overcharged
because of contracting with the same company. Mrs. Juanita McLaren audience
asked that the Council consider the inclusion of a provision in the comments
increase approval by which the trucks are required to pick up the garbage
cans in front of the hillside homes rather than have the homeowners haul
their garbage cans to the bottom of the hills particularly in view of
recently passed legislation prohibiting any type 0' burni~..
Councilman Noel moved, Councilman Fitzgerald seconded and it was passed p. h.
unanimously to close the public hearing. closed
page 4
request
approved
recess
taxicab B.
franchise
p. h.
closed
Minutes of the City Coun~n JunE; 2, 1969
CC-15
RatE; increase hearing cont'd
Councilman Noel stated that he was in favor of the rate increase as cost
of living had steadily increased and the request was justified; however,
that a provision should be included in the approval for a Spring and Fall
Pick-up of rubbish.
Councilman Stokes said that trash pi~k-up had plagued the City for a long
while and that this would be the time to confront the problem and to come
up with a solution particularly in view of the new burning legislation.
Mr. Stokes suggested that the City Council pursue the possibility of rubbish
pickup three or four times a year with "the City paying the cost of such
pickup to be taken out of the budget surplus instead of another decrease in
taxes.
Councilman Fitzgerald queried if homeowners had ever been notified of the
services offered and the charges for such services. The City Manager
emphasized that each homeowner had received a letter indicating all services
provided and the costs for each. Councilman Fitzgerald felt that there was
little eXcUBe for homeowners not knowing about the extent of the services
offered.
Councilman Beaven felt that, although he was receiving excellent service,
the increase proposed was entirely too high and without justification.
Councilman Stokes disagreed stating that the comparison of the increase with
the cost of living increases could not be related.
Councilman Fitzgerald moved that the request be approved as per the proposal
and that the City Mamger be authorized to investigate the possibility of
rubbish pick-up three or four times a year to be instituted before January 1,
1970. Councilman Noe:l seconde:d. The motion passed 4 - 1 with Councilman
Beaven voicing the "No" vote.
Mayor Dempster called a recess at 9:45 p.m.
The meeting reconvened at 10:00 p.m.
Franchise application for taxicab service filed by Sanford H. Sanger,
requesting approval of the transfer of franchise and ownership of
the business known as Cupertino Cab Company to Cabs Unlimited, Inc.,
a California Corporation, to operate in Cupertino under the name of
"Yellow Cab Company of Cuper'ttr.o".
City Attorney Anderson stated that he had reviewed the application and that
he found it in order and in accordance with the Ordinances. Further, that
the approval of this application would not be an exclusive right with no
possibility of future applications.
There were no audience comments.
Councilman Noel moved, Councilman Stokes seconded and it was passed unanimously
to close the public hearing.
Minutes of the City Council June 2, 1969
CC-15
page 5
Franchise application cont'd
Councilman Noel moved for approval of thE franchise application as
filed by Sanford H. Sanger and as approved by the City Attorney.
Councilman Stokes seconded and it was passed 'Œnanimously.
application
approved
C.
Appeal from Ward Crump requesting the City Council to reverse
the decision of the Planning Commission denying Application
lo-z-69 under Resolution No. 640.
10-z-69
appeal
Attorney Dan Donovan appeared on behalf of the landowner, Mr. Cliff
Simms, and the developer, Mr. Ward Cr'amp, and reiterated the history
of the application. Mr. Donovan stated that he and his clients were
cognizant of the points raised in opposition to this cluster development
and he asked that the architect make the presentation of the plot and
elevation plans, after which he reserved the right to rebut. The
Council concurred.
Mr. Goodwin Steinberg, architect for the project, explained the lay-out
and elevations by the use Jf architectural renderings and stated that
the activity areas drawn were true to size and scale compared to the
residence provisions. The number of proposed units, the covered area
and acreage, the open spaces, amenities and parking as well as land-
scaping and access to the site were explained in great detail.
When Mayor Dempster called for audience comments, Messrs. Kester and
Knight, Mrs. Richard Hirsher, Messrs. John Holland and Claude de Luc
voiced their opposition to the high density, the fact that the structures
would dominate the landscaping, the possibility of having to remove I
certain trees now in existence, the necessity to preserve as much open audience
space as possible, access off and onto Palm Avenue from the development,comments
and urged the Councilmen to preserve the natural setting as much as I
possible and to explore the criteria of retaining the site for a possible
purchase by the City for another park site.
Attorney Donovan stated in rebuttal that the area covered by concrete
would be 32.05% under the cluster development plan as opposed to a
covC'rage of 32.6% had the site been developed with Rl units; that there
was now more open space provided for because of the Flood Control
District requirerr£nts of some four acres out of a total eleven acres;
that the so provided easement was not at all convenient for riders and
horse trails and that there are other areas in this City for park sites.
Coundlmar. FitzgE:rald moved, Councilman Noel seconded and it was passed p. h.
unanimously to close the public hearing. closed
~
Councilman Beaven stated that this development appealed to him parti-
cularly as it was directed toward a special family unit, those whose
children are grown and have left home and that he was impressed by
the development. Alao, that he appreciated the difficulty as encountered
by the developer in regard to the restrictions imposed upon the site
by the Flood Control District. Mr. Beaven stated his favoring the
application.
page 6
appeal
upheld
l3-Z-69
legend
p. h.
closed
Minutes of the City Counci.l June 2, 1969
Appl. lo-z~69 appeal cont'd
CC-15
Councilman Fitzgerald stated that one of the major objections had
been the lack of sufficient access as well as ensuing traffic problems
but that these problems, in his opinion, could be solved. Mr. Fitz-
gerald emphasized that the audience comments 8ho'~d be directed to the
Flood Control District rathelthan to this Council and that he felt that
the development would be a definite asset to the community.
Councilman Stokes stated that cluster developments were the developments
of the future and that he had favored them many y~ars ago as they would
be the very best tool to attempt to prevent insufficient open spaces.
Mr. Stokes commented that he would willingly buy the site immediately
if the funds were available to afford the City another park site; however,
that the City Council was, meanwhile, facing inverse condemnation by
not allowing the developer to build the units on the site. Councilman
Stokes that he very much liked the proposal but that he would rather see
a park in that area for all the citizens of Cupertino.
Councilman Noel stated that he had been a member of the Park Chain Planning
Council and that, at that time, none of the people oppqsing the project
tonight had appeared at those meetings; in fact, the Council had been
disbanded for lack of funds as the citizenry was unwilling to expend such
funds.
City Attorney Anderson gave advise as to further procedure should the City
Council wish to uphold the appeaL It would be necessary to approve the
application, reverse the decision of the Planning Commission, and refer
the matter back to the Planning Commission for a report at the next City
Council meeting, without any further public hearings.
Councilman Fitzgerald moved to follow the procedure as outlined by the City
Attorney, Councilman Beaven seconded. The motion passed 4 - 1 with Council-
man Stokes dissenting. Councilman Stokes qualified his "No" vote by stating
that his vote was not against the development Or the developer, but as a
protest to make some of the citizens aware of the fact that the open spaces
are rapidly disappearing.
D.
Application l3-Z-69 from Leon Hayes for pre zoning of a portion of
lot l09 from County General Commercial (CG) zone to Light Industrial
(ML) zone. Approximately.o6 acre located on the south side of
Lomita Street between Pasadena and Imperial Avenues. (Ordinance
No. 441 on first reading).
Mr. Hayes presented the application and the Senior Planner explained that
the Planning Commission had approved the pre zoning with the statement that
such approval would not precedent a revision of the General Plan.
TherE were no audience comments.
Councilman Stokes moved, Councilman Noel seconded and it was passed unanimously
to close the public hearing.
Minutes of the City Council June 2, 1969
Applíc. 13-Z-69 cont'd
Councilman Stokes moved for approval of Application l3-Z-69 and for
the reading of Ordinance No. 441 by title only and that the Mayor's
reading of same constitutes a first reading. Councilman Noel seconded
and it was passed unanimously.
Ordinances
1. Ordinance No. 441 had previously been disposed of.
2.
Second reading of No. 440: Rezoning from single-family
agricultural-residential l-acre lots (Al-43) zpne to single-
famUy residential 7,500 sq. ft. lots (Rl-7.5) zone. Approxi-
mately 4.99 acres located east side of North Blaney Avenue,
some 800 feet south of ~unipero Serra Freeway.
Councilman Stokes moved, Councilman Noel seconded and it was passed
unanimously that the Ordinance be read by title only and that the
Mayor's reading of same constitutes a second reading.
Councilman Stokes moved for enactment, Councilman Noel seconded.
Ayes: Councilmen Beaven, Fitzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster
Noes: None
Absent: None
Resolutions
1.
No. 1797: approving payroll for the period ending May 20,
1969.
City Treasurer Fitzgerald presented the payroll. Councilman Stokeb
moved for adoption, Councilman Noel seconded.
Ayes: Councilmen Beaven, Fi.tzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster
Noes: None
Absent: None
2.
No. 1798: approving miscellaneous and general expenditures.
CC-15
page 7
13-Z-69
approved
Ord. 440
second
reading
Ord. 440
enacted
Res. 1797
adopted
Res. 1798
City Treasurer Fitzgerald presented the list of expenditures. Council- adopted
man S'okes moved for adoption, Councilman Noel seconded.
Ayes: Councilman Beaven, Fitzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster
Noes: None
Absent: None
3.
No. 1799: annexation designated "Junipero Serra 69-3"
Councilman Stokes moved for adoption, Councilman Noel seconded.
Ayes: Councilmen "Beaven, Fitzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster
Noes: None
Absent: None
Res. 1799
adopted
page 8
Res. 1800
adopted
Res. 1801
adopted
Res. 1802
adopted
Res. 1803
adopted
Res. 1804
adopted
Res. 1805
adopted
Minutes of the City Council June 2, 1969
CC-15
Resolutions cont'd
4.
No. 1800: annexation designated "Tawa 69-1"
Councilman Noel moved for adoption, Councilman fitzgerald seconded.
Ayes: Councilrr.en Beaven, Fitzgerald, Noel, Dempster
Noes: None
Absent: None
Abstain: Councilman Stokes
5.
No. 1801: annexation designated "Brown 69-4"
Councilman Stokes moved for adoption, Councilman Fit.zgerald seconded.
Ayes: Councilmen Beaven, Fitzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster
Noes: None
Absent: None
6.
No. 1802: accepting from George Ahamnos a quitclaim deed and
authorization for extracting of underground water from property;
located on the northwest corner of Portal Avenue and Stevens
Creek Boulevard.
Councilman Noel mùvçd for adoption, Councilman Stokes seconded.
Ayes: Councilmen Beaven, Fitzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster
Noes: None
Absent: None
7.
No. 1803: accepting from George Ahamnos dedication of real
property for roadway purposes located or thè northwest corner
of Stevens Creek Boulevard and Portal Avenue
Councilman Stokes moved for adoption, Councilman Fitzgerald seconded.
Ayes: Councilmen Beaven, Fitzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster
Noes: None
Absent: None
8.
No. l804:accepting from Takeyuki Toma a quitclaim deed and
authorization for the extraction of underground water from
property located north end of Portal Avenue near Junipero
Serra Freeway
Councilman Stokes moved for adoption, Councilman Fitzgerald seconded.
Ayes: Councilmen Beaven, Fitzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster
Noes: None
Absent: None
9.
No. 1805: accepting from Ditz-Crane a grant of easement located
in Somerset Square, Unit No.2, Tract 4658.
Councilman Stokes moved for adopti~ Councilman Fitzgerald seconded.
Ayes: Councilmen Beaven, Fitzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster
Noes: None
Absent: None
Minutes of the:: Cit.y'· Counc:i.l J\.::.ne 2:; 1969
Resolutions cont'd
10.
No. l806: approving final ~ap of tract No. 4695, Woods West;
accepting certain drives, places, avenues amd roads; author-
izing t~e City Clerk to sign the final map; and authorizing
the agreement in connection therewithe
Councilman Stokes moved for adoption, Cmmcilman Fitzgerald seconded.
Ayes: Coundlmen Beaven, Fitzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster
Noes: Ncn,e
Absent: None
CC-15
page 9
Res. 1806
adopted
11. No. 1807: approving final map of Tract No. 4643, Camada Manor; Res. 1807
accepting certain drives, places, avenues and roads; author-
izing the City Clerk to sign the final map; and authorizing
the agreement in conned ion therewith.
Councilman Stok6S moved for adoption, Councilman Fitzgerald seconded.
Ayes: C01XQcilrr£n Beaven, Fitzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster
Noes: None
Absent: NOD6
adopted
12. No. 180B: approving fi.nal plan for thè improvement of frontage Res. 1808
at the scutheaat corner of Homestead and Stelling Roads; author-
izing thE1 City Engineer to sign the final plan; and authorizing
execution of agre€ment i.n .connection t.herewith.
Councilman Stokes mov~d for adop";ion, Councilman Fitzgerald seconded.
Ayes: Co\mcìlmen Beaven, Fitzgerald, Nod, Stokes, Dempster
Noes: None
Absent: None
13.
No. 1809: granting a variance to Kevin M. McCarthy to reduce
residential rear yard s'etback to 14 feet from required 20
feet; located at 10490 Oakville A"<7enue.
Councilman Stokes moved for adoption, Ccuncilman Fitzgerald seconded.
Ayes: Councilmen Beaven. Fitzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster
Noes: None
Absent: None
Unfinished Business
A.
PI'o¡)erty surerey cwithin tt.e City of Cupertino by R. L. Polk
Company
Mr. Arch Posten represented the applicant and submitted a copy of the
questionnaire which is to be utilized by the enumerators.
The Councilmen questioned the use of the verbiage "City Directory" as
this was not a census being taken by the City of Cupertino, as well as
the word "Urgent" on "_he face of the pamphlet, but most particularly
the questions that were being asked which had been prompting citizens
to call city Hall in protest and opposition.
adopted
Res. 1809
adopted
survey
page 10
request
approved
with
conditions
Res. 1810
adopted
Res. 1811
adopted
attendance
authorized
Minutes of the City Council June 2, 1969
CC-l5
Unfinished Business cont'd
The Councilmen felt that the way in which1he questions were being asked
as well as the questions per se were an invasion of privacy and that
this was the reason for the applicant's being requested to appear as
complaints from citizens had repeatedly been received.
The applicant stated that the forms were being revised and that anything
not meeting the Council's approval would be deleted. Councilman Fitzgerald
asked if the applicant could guaraatee that this list would not be sold
to various mail order houses; the applicant's reply was negative.
Councilman Stokes said that he objected strenuously not only to the identi-
fication and the word "urgent" but also to the questions being asked. Mr.
Stokes emphatically stated that this survey was not being conducted for
purposes of a City Directory and that citizens should not, under any
circumstances, be led to believe that this was an official census, the law
making it illegal to refuse answers to an official census taker.
Councilman Stokes moved to approve the request with the following conditions:
1) that Item B not be used at all; 2) that under Item C the enumerator must
make the statement immediately that this is not an official City survey
and that the homeowner is not required to answer any of these questions at
all. Councilman Fitzgerald seconded and it was passed unanimously.
Mayor Dempster inquired of the Council if they wished to take action on
the salary resolutions and the Budget for the next fiscal year. Councilman
Stokes requested that action on the Budget be delayed.
Councilman Beaven moved for adoption of Resolution No. 1810, Councilman
Stokes seconded.
Ayes: Councilmen Beaven, Fitzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster
Noes: None
Absent: None
Councilman Stokes moved for adoption of Resolution No. 1811, Councilman
Noel seconded..
Ayes: Councilmen Beaven, Fitzgerald, Noel, Stokes, Dempster
Noes: None
Absent: None
New Business
Councilman Beaven moved to authorize the Mayor's attendance of the annual
Mayor's Conference in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Councilman Noel seconded
and it was passed unanimously.
Report of Officers
There were no further reports from the City Attorney, the City Manager or
the City Treasurer.
D. Director of Public Works
modification Councilman Stokes moved for approval of a modification of the sidewalk
approved standards on Linda Vista Drive adjacent to lots 158, 159, 160 and 161 in
Baywood Terrace No. 3 on the recommendation of the Director of Public Works
for lowering the slope of the driveways.
Minutes of the City Council June 2, 1969
GC-15
page 11
Report of Officers cont'd
Mayor Dempster stated that the City had been represented at the Santa
Clara County Water Conservation District and that the decree had not
been in favor of the City. Mr. Dempster suggested that the City Council
consider giving the City Attorney authority to perserve the City's legal
rights if the administrative remedies have in fact been exhausted.
Councilman Stokes so moved, Councilman Fitzgerald seconded and it was
passed unanimously.
Counsel
receives
authorization
There were no further reports from the Senior Planner or the Building
Department.
G.
Director of Parks and Recreation
parks
Mr. Parham requested authorization to pay $l,OOO to Mr. Eldon Beck in
connection with the Hillside Park development. Councilman Beaven moved
for such authorization, Councilman Fitzgerald seconded and it was
passed unanimously.
H.
City Clerk - Finance Director
clerk
On introduction and explanation of the Work Study Program Off-Campus
Project Agreement with San Jose State College by City Clerk - Finance
Director Ryder, it was moved by Councilman Noel, seconded by Councilman
Fitzgerald and passed unanimously that the City Manager be authorized
to sign said agreement on behalf of the City of Cupertino for the year
ending June 30, 1970.
program
authorized
Councilman Noel moved for adjournment, Councilman Stokes seconded and
it was passed unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 12:10 a.m.
adjournment
APPROVED:
ATTEST: