DRC Reso 173R-2004-27
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO. 173
OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A
NEW, TWO-STORY 3,629 SQUARE FOOT RESIDENCE AND A SECOND STORY DECK
EXCEPTION.
SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.: R-2004-27
Applicant: Jing Duan (Kidambi residence)
Location: 10060 Carmen Road
SECTION II: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the. Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Design Review Committee has held one or more
public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application;
and has satisfied the following requirements:
1. The project is consistent with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan, any
applicable specific plans, zoning ordinances and the purposes of Chapter 19.28 of the
Cupertino Municipal Code.
2. The granting of this permit will not result in a condition that is detrimental or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to
the public health, safety or welfare;
3. The proposed addition/ home is harmonious in scale and design with the general
neighborhood;
4. The proposed addition/home is generally consistent with design guidelines
developed by the Director of Community Development;
5. The proposed addition/home will not result in significant adverse visual impacts as
viewed from adjoining properties.
Resolution No. 173 R-2004-27 September 15, 2004
Page 2
6. The literal enforcement of the provisions of this chapter will result in restrictions
inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this chapter;
7. The granting of this exception will not result in a condition that is materially
detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare;
8. The exception granted is one that will require the least modification of the prescribed
design regulation and the minimum variance that will accomplish the purpose;
9. The proposed exception will not result in significant visual impact as viewed from
abutting properties.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the design review application is hereby approved subject to the
conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on page 2 thereof; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution
are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application R-2004-27 set
forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee meeting of, September 15, 2004, and
are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein.
SECTION III. CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED PROTECT
This approval is for a new, two-story 3,629 square foot residence and a second story deck
exception, based on the plan set entitled "New Residence, 10060 Carmen Road,
Cupertino, CA" dated August 23, 04, consisting of 10 pages, except as may be amended
by conditions in this resolution.
2. PRIVACY PROTECTION SCREENING
A detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review
and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The landscaping plan shall indicate
City's approved privacy protection trees to screen views from second story windows and
decks in accordance with the R1 Ordinance.
3. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS
The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with
regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any
misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Design
Review Committee.
Resolution No. 173 R-2004-27 September 15, 2004
Page 3
4. PRIVACY PROTECTION COVENANT
The property owner shall record a covenant on this property to inform future property
owners of the privacy protection measures and tree protection requirements. The precise
language will be subject to approval by the Director of Community Development. Proof
of recordation must be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to
final occupancy of the residence.
5. MINIMUM SECOND STORY WALL OFF SET RULE
The applicant shall make the necessary revisions to provide a minimum two feet deep by
six feet wide wall offset to exterior walls over 24 feet wide on the second story. Revised
plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of
building permits.
6. MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK FROM FENCE
A minimum of 5 feet setback (or to a distance satisfactory to the Fire and Building
Department) shall be provided from the proposed home to any perimeter fence. A
revised fence plan shall be provided to the Planning. Department for review and approval
prior to issuance of building permits.
7. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein, may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government
Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the
amount of such fees, 'and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other
exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you
may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to
Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90 -
day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally
barred from later challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15t" day of September 2004, at a Regular Meeting of the
Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following .roll
call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Commissioner Miller and Chairperson Wong
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
Resolution No. 173
Page 4
ATTEST:
Ciddy Wordell
City Planner
G: \ Planning \ DRC \ res \ R-2004-27 res.doc
R-2004-27 September 15, 2004
APPROVED:
Gilbert Wong, Chairtittee
n
Design Review Co