The URL can be used to link to this page

DRC Summary 060204 City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308 To: Mayor and City Council Members Planning Commissioners From: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development Date: June 4, 2004 Subj: REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE FINAL DECISIONS MADE June 2,2004 Chapter 19.136 of the Cupertino Municipal code provides for A eal of decisions made b the Desi n Review Committee 1. Application EXC-2004-04; Alan Ford (Hewlett Packard), 11000 N. Wolfe Road Description Sign exception to allow the replacement of ten existing ground signs with new ground signs for an office/industrial campus. Action The Design Review Committee approved the application on a 2-0 vote. This is effective June 2, 2004. The fourteen-calendar day appeal will expire on June 16, 2004. Enclosures: Design Review Committee Report of June 2, 2004 Resolution No. 156 Plan Set 2. Application ASA-2004-11; Jeff Jacobs/Centex Homes, 7308 - 7318 Rainbow Drive Description Architectural and Site Approval for final architectural and site details (including 8-foot tall fencing along portions of the project perimeter) on an approved residential development (formerly Saron Gardens). Action The Design Review Committee approved the application on a 2-0 vote. This is effective June 2, 2004. The fourteen-calendar day appeal will expire on June 16, 2004. Enclosures: Design Review Committee Report of June 2, 2004 Resolution No. 157 Plan Set 3. Application EXC-2004-07; Ravin Checker, 10376 Amistad Court Description Fence Exception to allow a seven-foot fence in the front yard setback area. Action The Design Review Committee approved the application on a 2-0 vote. This is effective June 2, 2004. The fourteen-calendar day appeal will expire on June 16, 2004. Enclosures: Design Review Committee Report of June 2, 2004 Resolution No. 158 Plan Set G:planning/Drc/O60204 summaryletter.doc To: From: Subject: Location: Design Review Committee Colin Jung, Senior Planner Application: EXC-2004-04 11000 N. Wolfe Road Date: June 2, 2004 Project Description: Sign exception to allow the replacement of 10 existing ground signs with 10 new signs on the Wolfe Road Hewlett Packard Campus. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of EXC-2004-04, based on the model resolution. BACKGROUND: The Hewlett Packard Wolfe Road Campus is located on a 101 acre, three lot, block surrounded by four public streets: Wolfe Road, Homestead Road, Tantau Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue. 11 of the 12 buildings on the site are oriented to the interior of the property and surrounded by surface parking and a wide and tall landscape berm that obscures most of the buildings from public street view. The campus is served by 11 driveway entrances and internal circulation is accomplished through a network of driveways and pedestrian paths that link the buildings together. As the campus is very large with multiple buildings, the ten entrance ground signs are important for corporate identity and directing vendors, employees and customers where to go on the campus. The applicant is proposing to replace these 10 ground signs with 10 new signs. DISCUSSION: The chart below summarizes the existing signage data and signage proposal: Existin Ground Sil!n Proposed Ground Si¡;n Sign Street Height Length Size Illum.? Height Length Size Illum. ? No Location (ft~) (ft~) (so. ft.\ YfN (ft~) (ft~) (ft.) YfN 1 Wolfe 3 9 27 N 5 8.41 42.05 Y, external 2 Wolfe 3 3.5 10.5 N 6 2.75 13.44 N 3 Wolfe 3.66 11.04 40.4 N 7 10.58 74.06 4 Homestead 3 3.5 10.5 N 6 2.75 13.44 N 5 Homestead 3 3.5 10.5 N 6 2.75 13.44 N 6 Homestead 3 3.5 10.5 N 6 2.75 13.44 N 7 Tantau 3.04 3.58 10.88 N 6 2.75 13.44 N 8 Pruneridge 3 9.04 27.12 N 5 8.41 42.05 Y, external 9 Pruneridge 3 9 27 N 5 8.41 42.05 Y, external 10 Tantau Sign removed; no data 6 2.75 13.44 N Totals I ì 174.4 280.85 A sign location map is on sheet 1 of 12. Sheets 2 through 5 are pictures of the existing signs # 1-9. Sign #10 was removed and staff has no data, but it was probably the same I-I as other entrance directional signage, which is 10.5 square feet in size. Sheets 6 through 12 show the proposed signage. A sign exception is being requested because the signage needs of this large property owner differ significantly from what would be allowed from a sign code standpoint, and the proposal is about 100 square feet more aggregate sign area than what was existing. The Code allows a maximum of four ground signs and the owner has 11 widely separated driveways. The Code allows numerous large wall signs for the buildings, but this is of little benefit to the property owner whose buildings are mostly invisible from the street, and this signage allowance has not be utilized. Staffis supportive ofthe sign exception and believes the findings can be made as noted below: Findings for Exception Per Section 17.44.040 of the Municipal Code, the Design Review Committee may grant an exception based upon the following findings: A. Literal Enforcement of the Sign Regulations are Inconsistent with Spirit and Intent of Sign Ordinance Part of the intent of the Sign Ordinance is to "provide regulations of sign size, height and quantity which will allow for good visibility for the public and the needs of business while providing for the safety of the public by minimizing distraction to the motorist and pedestrian." The campus is large with multiple entrances, and the buildings are obscured from the public street by property setback and mature landscaping. The only effective means to direct employees, vendors and customers around the campus is a series of directional signs around the campus. The larger signs are at the main gates and at the credit building (sign #9) to provide corporate identity and direction. B. The granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare The additional signage area will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. The amount of signage area is modest in comparison to the size of the campus and the number of entrances. C. Least Modification and Minimum Variance to Accomplish Purpose The maximum potential ground signage is over 2,000 square feet. Since the Sign Code caps the maximum ground signage to 100 square feet per lot, Hewlett Packard's maximum is 300 square feet for the three lots. HP has proposed 280 square feet. 2 I-~ Prepared by: Colin Jung, Senior Planner Cffo Approved by: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner J Enclosures: Model Resolution Plan Set G:\Plannmg\DRC\staff rep\EXC-2004-O'i SR.doc 3 1-3 EXC-2004-04 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR A SIGN EXCEPTION TO ALLOW THE REPLACEMENT OF TEN EXISTING GROUND SIGNS WITH NEW GROUND SIGNS FOR AN OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL CAMPUS AT 11000 WOLFE ROAD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No,: EXC-2004-04 . Applicant: Alan Ford (for Hewlett Packard) Location: 11000 Wolfe Road SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Sign Exception, as described in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and compatible with the surrounding area; 1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title; 2. That the granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare; and 3. That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of the prescribed regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application no. EXC-2004-04, is here by approved; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application EXC-2004-04 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of June 2, 2004, and are incorporated by reference herein. 1--1 Resolution No. Page 2 EXC-2004-04 June 2, 2004 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on a plan set entÎtled: "Location 749-43: 11000 Wolfe Road, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 12 pages, except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution, 2, NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun, If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of June 2004, at a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Ciddy Wordell City Planner Marty Miller, Acting Chair Design Review Committee G:\Planning\ DRC\res\EXC-2004-04 res.doc 1-5 EXC-2004-04 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 156 OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR A SIGN EXCEPTION TO ALLOW THE REPLACEMENT OF TEN EXISTING GROUND SIGNS WITH NEW GROUND SIGNS FOR AN OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL CAMPUS AT 11000 WOLFE ROAD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: EXC-2004-04 Applicant: Alan Ford (for Hewlett Packard) Location: 11000 Wolfe Road SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Sign Exception, as described in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and compatible with the surrounding area; 1, That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title; 2. That the granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare; and 3. That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of the prescribed regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application no. EXC-2004-04, is here by approved; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application EXC-2004-04 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of June 2, 2004, and are incorporated by reference herein. Resolution No. 156 Page 2 EXC-2004-04 June 2, 2004 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. L APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on a plan set entitled: "Location 749-43: 11000 Wolfe Road, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 12 pages, except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2, NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions, Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions, You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions, PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of June 2004, at a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Commissioner Chen and Acting Chair Miller COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/ CiddyWordell Ciddy Wordell City Planner /s/ Marty Miller Marty Miller, Acting Chair Design Review Committee G:\Planning\ DRC\res\EXC-2004-M res.doc 04 R 00 ,v; (-c'~'=~'c"'~~ _._~~~--""'.---c~'-=-~'-.,> ~ APPROVAl ex ~ -~. J ORe - cl; . Cas ana er CUPERTINO SITE ,c- C"""";':~"""",";<>,"/ ~ ~ [ - , ...., LEGEND ~ ACTION, SIGN #. ACTION CODES D R:REPLACE <;> OVERVIEW PHOTO X : REMOVE - SIGN f:= EæEOM ~BUILDING N:NEW f+-"':,,'- - - -, PROPERTY LINE -.~"Æ" tttttttI RAIL ROAD ., , " ' - - ., .,., FENCE ~tO,~ SITE PLAN ~JI invent LOCATION: 749-43 11000 WOLFE CUPERTINO, CA FILE: 749-43.cdr -- DATE: 10-16-03 PAGE #1 OF #12 APPROVED BY / DATE REVISED: 02-17-04 KP tf3¡.~ct SCALE: AS NOTED L"J~~ i~ 1418 Elmhurst Rd. Elk Grovt! Village Illinois 60007 DRAWN: ABP ".,m, S,""m OVERVIEW PHOTO #1 OVERVIEW PHOTO. 5/ (b Ai Ii-- 7 Pi] LOCATION: 749-43 11000 WOLFE invent CUPERTINO, CA . '\¡:"'::'=== r ,. "~, =,-...,.,,--... f APPROVAL f¥(-~-'~-- If ~ NurñI8r ~ DRC ~ ;;;¡\Çtt l Signature ¡ j ,..,'"'"c...,.,,~.,..) OVERVIEW PHOTO" <5/ a.AJ t£ ~ OVERVIEW PHOTO" (5( c"N if ð OVERVIEW PHOTO #I <5 I ('.. f-J 1£3 FILE: 749-43.cdr PAGE #2 OF #12 APPROVEO BY I DATE DATE: 10-16-03 REVISED: 02-17-04 KP t(3¡.~ct DRAWN: ABP SCALE: AS NOTED i4'J~~ OVERVIEW PHOTOS eQ 1418 Elmhunt Rd. Icon ElkGroveVtllage . 1IImois 60007 """'yOo""o" r ~~~ --~~=-;-~ -~ I ~k:ation Number DRC \¡;J ;¡ \ œt , ~_. Signature .. - ~ , ~""-~..r invent LOCATION: 749-43 11000 WOLFE CUPERTINO, CA FILE: 749-43.cdr PAGE #3 OF #12 APPROVED BY I DATE DATE: 10-16-03 REVISED: 02-17-04 KP Projecl Mg'.: DRAWN: ABP SCALE: AS NDTED ~J~! OVERVIEW PHOTOS i~ 1418 Elmhurst Rd. Elk Grove Village Illinois 60007 PII """'ySo'."o" Sign#:~ lIIum.D Non ilium.. SfFD OfF. H~W~O~OAH~ Primary Electrical & Landscaping required Sign #:~ lIIum.D Non ilium.. SfF. OfF D H 36" W 42'" 0 53/4'" OAH 47" --- - Sign#:~ lIIum.D Non ilium.. SfFD OfF. Nole: Nole: Notes H ~ W1321/2" 0 ~OAH 681/2" Nole: Primary Electrical & Landscaping required Sign#:~ lIIum.D Non ilium.. SfF. ofFD H 36" W 42" 0 6'" OAH 43" --- - Sign #:~ lIIum.D Non ilium.. SfF. ofFD H~W~O~OAH~ Sign#:~ lIIum.D Non ilium.. SfF. OfF D H 36" W 42"A 0 6" OAH 49" --- Nole: Notes Nole: Notes Nole: Notes invent LOCATION: 749-43 11000 WOLFE CUPERTINO, CA FILE: 74S-43.cdr DATE: 10-16-03 PAGE #4 OF #12 APPROVED BY I DATE EXISTING SIGN PHOTOS eQ 1418 Elmhurst Rd. ICOn Elk Grove Vúlage - Illinois 60{l()7 PII DRAWN: ABP REVISED: 02-17-04 KP tf31.!c! SCALE: AS NOTED ~J1~ """" So""m Sign #:~ lIIum.D Non ilium.. SfF. DIFD H 36 1/2'" W 43" D 6" OAH 54 1/2'" --- - Note: Notes Sign #:~ lIIum.D Non ilium.. sfFD DIF. H~W1081/2'" D~OAH 661/2'" Note: Primary Electrical Required Sign#:~ lIIum.D Non ilium.. SIFD DfF. H 36" W 108 D N/A OAH 46'" --- Note: Use existing concrete & primary electrical required Sign #:~ Note: Notes lIIum.D Nonlllum.D sfFD DIFD H N/A W N/A D N/A OAH N/A --- - FILE: 749-43.cdr DATE: 10-16-03 PAGE #5 OF #12 APPROVAL ~ - ~ -0'\- Appli~tion NI CRC Sign #:~ Sign#:~ lIIum.D Non lIIum.D SIFD DfF 0 H N/A W N/A D N/A OAH N/A --- Note: lIIum.D Non lIIum.D sfFD DIFD H N/A W N/A D N/A OAH N/A --- - Notes Pl] LOCATION: 749-43 11000 WOLFE invent CUPERTINO, CA REVISED: 02-17-04 KP ~31.!cf SCALE: AS NOTED fl'J~~ DRAWN: ABP Note: Notes APPROVEO BY I DATE EXISTING SIGN PHOTOS .Q 1418 Elmhurst Rd. Icon ElkGroveVtllage - Illinois 60007 "...01', Sol"'o" Pl] invent 8'-5" I 4'-11" 2'-6" ñ Ea. I 2'-7" I Ea. I J~: 3 1/~h~ 1/2" '" 'I ~ 0 ~ -' '" or> ' M ~¡) 11 ()()()¥ , invent N Site Entry Sign (Medium Horizontal) 4.05 MEDIUM Side View 2'-6" I I 8~ I WoKe Rd. ~~ Panel Detail Sign #1 Qty: 1 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0" Elevation Sign #1 Scale: N.T.S. LOCATION: 749-43 11000 WOLFE r---' 'A~""'~'~7~"-"\:o ; )j ., APPROVAL ~L -.3.::04 -t:;4- ¥ APp¡¡¡n Number t CRC LP ;¡ O't- ! "go""," C,(L "\L~ I. '! cas&,ana ), 'i,=".,""..~.'=~'-'-~_'~--'""""""""<'~-'~"""" ' PROPOSED SIGNS i~ FILE: 749-43.cdr PAGE #6 ()f #12 APPROVED BY I DATE DATI: 10-16-03 REVISED: 02-17-04 KP tl3¡.~cI DRAWN: ABP SCALE: AS NOTED L"o~~ 1418 Elmnunt Rd. Elk Grove Vtllage Illinois 60007 CUPERTINO, CA "."",s.""", ~,I ~,.'.~ I,Â 00 10'-7" .y-' "'--,.." "'~ '-"""""""'"'...,"-~~ f r~ APPROVAL ~'6 c.../~ -04 I' DRC "'~ ¡i ! ate I[ ~,',' S-;'1'1ture ~ " / "',,,1 :1 d e Ma erJ; "'-~- ."~,.,~""",~-~~--~~","""""",_....,,,,,J it bl- ~ ..:. 'r .;, iD Site Identity Sign (Large Horizontal) Sign #3 Qty: 1 Scale: 3/16"=1'-0" 3,02 LARGE Side View ~JI Elevation Sign #3 Scale: N.T.S. LOCATION: 749-43 invent 11000 WOLFE CUPERTINO, CA FilE: 749-43.cdr PAGE #7 OF #12 APPROVED BY I DATE DATE: 10-16-03 REVISED: 02-17-04 KP ~31.!ct DRAWN: ABP SCALE: AS NOTED ~J~~ PROPOSED SIGNS i~ 1418 Elmhurst Rd. Elk Grove Vtlhge Illinois 60007 """'rO,""'" !i5 - 9 <c !, 1;> '"' 1 2,~~:9' n ~ Pi] .....1 Gate 3 .~ Wolfe Entrance f- Homestead ~f-~ Deliveries F 'ii ~;~.1 7,03 Entry Directional (Large Freestanding) Sign #2 Qty: 1 Scale: 1/2"=1'-0" PII invent f1 1 /~:9' n ~ !i5 ~ Pi] . 0 we 01 9 <c '" .;., '\> '"' 1;,'"' f-- 11J?'~11,," ~ Side View 7,03 S.F. Entry Directional (Large Freestanding) Sign #4 Qty: 1 Scale: 1/2"=1'-0" LOCATION: 749-43 11000 WOLFE CUPERTINO, CA FILE: 749-43,cdr PAGE #8 Of #12 DATE: 10-16-03 DRAWN: ABP REVISED: 02-17-04 KP SCALE: AS NOTED --"~~ APPROVAL CRC Signature :, J .=><-,""".,-- .."", !i5 J .. C¡{G~ Ma¡¡á,l)er ...J .."",,:-.... 1-"'-- c~::~~.~ n . "'< ""c"";",,,",="c"-~- 9 <c ~ Pi] "'.0 t 111>'~11n' ~ 7.03 S.F. Entry Directional (Large Freestanding) Sign #5 Qty: 1 Scale: 1/2"=1'-0" APPROVED BY I DATE 1:l3¡,~ct ~~~ PROPOSED SIGNS i~ 1418 Elmhurst Rd. Elk Grove Village IIlinoÙ 60007 """'yS."""" ., J ,; iì t =:J~ N ::::J~ N ~ I /~:~ n ~ ~ Pi] '" <c '" .;, t\> ¡., '" ~ 7.03 S,F. Entry Directional (Large Freestanding) Sign #6 Qty: 1 Scale: 1/2"=1'-0" ~JI LOCATION: 749-43 11000 WOLFE CUPERTINO, CA invent f1 Side View ~ ~ 31/4' 25/8' '" <c '" .;, 3'1 43/8' M 27/8' 3' 31/4' 31/4' 43/8' 31/4' 31/4" /'.'=-=-~' _.,. _c. -,- APPROVAL t'6. e.. -~-cA ! Appiic3tion Number ¡ ORC wI 9.\ cA- , f' D,~ " Signature ~ '~~ eo" M" 2',6' a. I 91/8 -';t""-~'~--"'" "','~ ~,~'."". ", ..- ~ ï1" , ---- '^,-' Pi] I.... t 10955 Tantou Gale 8 ];i] ,1' Lobby 45 If- Customer Center 44, 46 Lobby 47 48 ~I 42 43 44 Receiving 7,03 S.F, Entry Directional (Large Freestanding) Side View Sign #7 Qty: 1 Scale: 1/2"=1'-0" FilE: 749.43,cdr PAGE #9 OF #12 REVISED: 02-17.04 KP 1418 Elmhurst Rd. Elk Grove Village Illinois 60007 DATE: 10.16-03 DRAWJ: A8P APPROVED BY / DATE ~8¡.!ct ~~~ PROPOSED SIGNS i~ SCALE: AS NOTED "."""0""",,, , , ~ I ! P¡) invent bl ~ -' '" .., , ëo> - 2'-6" I ~' I I I ~ 3 1/2' h 3 1/2" n~n I Main Enwy ~~ I Gate 1 ~~ Panel Detail Side View 8'-5" I 4'-11" 2'-6" ñ Ea, I 2'-7" I EQ. I to ~l] invent N Site Entry Sign (Medium Horizontal) 4,05 MEDIUM Sign #8 Qty: 1 Scale: 1/4"= 1 '-0" Elevation Sign #8 Scale: N.T.S. LOCATION: 749-43 11000 WOLFE CUPERTINO, CA (-:;~:~ ~~L-~::r~--'-~, ì APPli~tion ~]umber I,' I CRC lo ~\cA-- ¡ , Cr{¿ aate . Signature '-. ~ ¡ &eM er "',=",c,,~,----'-"._-,.-,< --.-..0_'- FILE: 749-43.cdr PAGE #10 OF #12 APPROVED BY I DATE DATE: 10-16-03 REVISED: 02-17-04 KP 1:l3¡.~ct DRAWM: ABP SCALE: AS NOTED flo~~ PROPOSED SIGNS i~ 1418 Elmhurst Rd. Elk Grot" VtI/agf Illinois 60007 ...,m, ."'""" ~l] invent "I ~ 0 ~ -' en Ln , '"'" " .t 8'-5" I 4'-11" 2'-6" ñ EO. I 2'-7" I EO. I '" ~ ~¡J invent Ñ co Site Entry Sign (Medium Horizontal) 4.05 MEDIUM 73/4" 3 1/ftq Side View 2'-6" I I E~ I PNn~idge ~ffi Sign #9 Dty: 1 Scale: 1/4"=1'-0" Elevation Sign #9 Scale: N,T.S. LOCATION: 749-43 11000 WOLFE CUPERTINO, CA 'C' ('-~~ ---... -- ~-,'-',--- ._~- "Þ "" if : APPROVAL £>-1. l: ~CA ; ! Application Number ¡' i CRC VI\ ;;¡\ cA f I ~e t , Signature . ! Case anag r j i:.,=~.-¿,~~. -, ~.W.,. '...-' '----""--~) PROPOSED SIGNS i~ FILE: 749-43.cdr PAGE #11 OF #12 APPROVED BY I DATE DATE: 10-16-03 REVISED: 02-17-04 KP tf3¡.~ct DRAWN: A8P SCALE: AS NDYED L"J~~ 1418 Elmhurst Rd. Elk Grove Vt/Ioge 1IIinoÙ 60007 """.".."",. _.~ ~~ ¡¡¡ !¡ 6 11' t! ~ ~ ÇJ g b, :::! ::E :z 0 ~ ;¡:¡ :Þ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. 6; ë? ~ ." ~ , 9' ~ ~ g ~ '" ¡¡; ~ ~ 0; ;;. !'1 ;;; ~ 0 z 0 ~ 51 '}' " :; ::: ;;; b .... ^ ." ~~,. "0 ..... ¡g < a ~ - ~ Iê) >::t>1<; !i""õ;; ~. ~ t>1 "'~¡¡- ~~~ {~ W~,g'- "',. ::> ?D~:, ~ ~ 11- ~ -a :D 0 -a 0 en m 0 en as z en (I) ;on m =- .ë! 51. ñ! Sl õ' :::I !!!. -¡:: I» a C'D ... :t'f: .. C'D !!L I» :::I CI. S' So en ¡¡ CD :5õ CD :Ii 6',0" 4',9" 3',8" :::r~ ....,., .--... '--'t r-; go t ~ ~ à ~; ~ a ~ " 11 ~"-"- ---......-. I I :1 'j , 1 ! " .C" To: From: Subject: Location: Design Review Committee Gary Chao, Assistant Planner Application: ASA-2004-11 7308-7318 Rainbow Drive Date: June 2, 2004 Project Description: Architectural Site Approval for final architectural and site details (including 8-foot tall fencing along portions of the project perimeter) on an approved residential development (formerly Saron Gardens). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of ASA-2004-11, based on the model resolution, BACKGROUND: The project planned residential development was approved by the City Council on July 7, 2003. As part of the approval, the applicant, Centex Homes, is required to obtain final Design Review Committee approval pertaining to the following items: . Site fencing (interior and perimeter) . Entry trellis features . Semi-pervious interlocking pavers . Site lighting . Final landscaping plan . Final exterior color combinations DISCUSSION: Site Fencing (picket fencing) 39 out of a total of 53 units will have picket fencing in the front yard area. The applicant proposes three general picket fencing types (A, B, C), Type A consists of round top pickets. Type B consists of square top pickets and type C consists of angle top pickets. With the exception of the differently shaped picket tops, the 3 picket types do not have any other features that would set them apart. As proposed, groups of units will share the same picket fence design, Staff is recommending that the design of the picket fencing be alternated between units to provide more interest and individuality to each of the units. A taller decorative post could be placed in between different picket designs between units. The applicant is aware of these suggestions and will bring revised options to the meeting for review, 07- ! Perimeter Fencing The applicant is proposing to install new wood perimeter fencing along the majority of the northerly and southerly property line. Since the project site is surrounded by existing residential uses, portions of the existing 6-foot perimeter fencing are in good condition and may be preserved. The applicant will need to obtain proper consent from the adjacent property owners to remove and replace a fence located on a joint property line, Entry Trellis Features One of the attractive elements of this project is that the majority of the units will have either an arched or flat trellis feature at the entry area. There are also trellis features at various key entry points leading to walkways that serve the interior units, These trellis features not only provide more landscaping opportunities but they also provide more architectural and visual relief that will help activate the walkways and open spaces. Staff is recommending that similar trellis features be provided in front of Lots 14, 13 and 53 and in between lots 25 & 26 and 21 & 22. Also, the entry pilaster (detail 4 on sheet L6,3) should be revised to be either the arched or flat trellis features. The applicant is aware of these suggestions, Semi-pervious Interlocking Pavers One of the conditions of this project is that semi-pervious decorative paving materials be introduced in portions of the access driveway. The applicant has satisfied the condition and the driveway paving and material plans (Sheets FL 1,2, FL 1,3, L2.1, L2.2) provide examples and details of the decorative paving material. The paving sample will be provided at the meeting for review. Site Lighting All of the proposed site lightings are consistent with the Zoning Ordinance, The applicant proposes bollard lights along all interior pedestrian paths and all of the pole lights (serving the open space area and parking area) have cut-off shields to prevent any glare onto adjacent properties. Please refer to the photometric plan for details. Landscaping Plan Staff supports the final landscaping plan with the exception that all of the units adjacent to an existing single-family residence must provide sufficient privacy protection planting in order to screen any views from new second story windows. The applicant is required to work with staff to address this issue prior to issuance of building permits. Final Exterior C%r Combination The original submitted conceptual color package consists of 6 different combinations. The applicant has refined the combinations and is proposing 5 final color combinations, Staff feels that this is an improvement from the original conceptual package and 2 ;J-~ supports the change. A detailed color and material board will be presented at the meeting. Prepared by: Approved by: Gary Chao, Assistant Planner Ciddy Wordell, City Planner '-C "CL ,(;; Enclosures: Model Resolution Fencing and Paving Plan Materials Plan Lighting Plan Color and Material Board Material Board (available at the public hearing) Detail Color Samples (available at the public hearing) G:\Planning\DRC\staff rep\ASA-2004-11 SRdoc 3 B-3 ASA-2004-11 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO, OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL FOR FINAL ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DETAILS (INCLUDING 8-FOOT TALL FENCING ALONG PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT PERIMETER) ON AN APPROVED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (FORMERLY SARON GARDENS). SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: ASA-2004-11 Jeff Jacobs - Representing Centex Homes 7308 - 7318 Rainbow Drive SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Design Review Committee has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of this chapter, the General Plan, and zoning ordinance; 3. Abrupt changes in building scale is avoided and a gradual transition related to height and bulk is achieved; and 4, Design harmony between new and existing buildings and structures is protected through the use of consistent or compatible design and color schemes 'I 4 c>< - ASA-2004-11 June 2, 2004 Resolution No. Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the design review application is hereby approved subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application ASA-2004-11 set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee meeting of, June 2, 2004, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III. CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT, 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on a plan sets entitled: "Murano Centex Homes, Fencing Plan" dated May 13, 2004; "Murano Centex Homes, Materials Plan" dated May 7, 2004; "Murano, Lighting Plan" dated February 11, 2004; except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. PICKET FENCES The picket fence design shall alternate between units to provide more interest and individuality to each of the units. Revised plans shall be approved by Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits, 3. TRELLIS FEATURES Either arch or flat trellis features shall be provided in front of lots 14, 13 and 53 and in between lots 25 & 26 and 21 & 22. Also, the entry pilaster (detail 4 on sheet L6,3) shall be revised to be either the arched or flat trellis features, Revised plans shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits. 4, PRIVACY PROTECTION . All lots adjacent to existing single-family residence shall provide the required privacy protection planting per Rl Ordinance. All privacy screening trees shall be recorded on the property as a covenant prior to of final occupancy, 5. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions, Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun, If you fail to file a protest within this 90- Ô'-5 Resolution No. Page 3 ASA-2004-11 June 2, 2004 day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of June 2004, at a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner Gilbert Wong, Chairperson Design Review Committee G: I Planning I DRCI resIASA-2004-11 res, doc d ' <...0 ASA-2004-11 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 157 OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL FOR FINAL ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DETAILS (INCLUDING 8-FOOT TALL FENCING ALONG PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT PERIMETER) ON AN APPROVED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (FORMERLY SARON GARDENS), SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: ASA-2004-11 Jeff Jacobs - Representing Centex Homes 7308 - 7318 Rainbow Drive SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Design Review Committee has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2, The proposal is consistent with the purposes of this chapter, the General Plan, and zoning ordinance; 3, Abrupt changes in building scale is avoided and a gradual transition related to height and bulk is achieved; and 4. Design harmony between new and existing buildings and structures is protected through the use of consistent or compatible design and color schemes Resolution No. 157 Page 2 June 2, 2004 ASA-2004-11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the design review application is hereby approved subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application ASA-2004-11 set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee meeting of, June 2, 2004, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein, SECTION III. CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on a plan sets entitled: "Murano Centex Homes, Fencing Plan" dated May 13, 2004; "Murano Centex Homes, Materials Plan" dated May 7, 2004; "Murano, Lighting Plan" dated February 11, 2004; except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. PICKET FENCES The picket fence design shall alternate between units to provide more interest and individuality to each of the units. Type B shall consist of dog-ear picket designs. Revised plans shall be approved by Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits. 3, TRELLIS FEATURES Either arched or flat trellis features shall be provided in front lot 53, at the entry point to lots 13 & 14 and in between lots 25 & 26 and 21 & 22. Also, the entry pilaster (detail 4 on sheet L6,3) shall be revised the arched trellis features. Revised plans shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits, 4, PRIV AOi PROTECTION All lots adjacent to existing single-family residence shall provide the required privacy protection planting per Rl Ordinance. The all privacy-screening trees shall be recorded on the properties as a covenant and in the CC & R prior to final building approval. 5. SITE LIGHTING All light poles shall be stepped aluminum pole for side mount crooks - CASI0-534188B and the bollards lights shall be type BOR80-W per the submitted lighting details. II) :> it tJ J () <o{l L ~ \;~ '" ~ 's:-~ ~ ~J ',l.'(~ ' '~~ ,- - ~\- ~ cd ,:::, ,~ ~p <:::: ~/, ¡~ C.::.c~ <P ('I) IT" ¿, ::r- ~ -", . /'" '-'- ",-, -"'-" ""'--'.""""'---'-,,-,~..,...... , r).J :x II:'" l . d 9m'ON SHVlJOSSV Imom ~d£Z: I vOOl'l .unr u- --",",," ..J ~ 0 a: 0 a. a: ~ Q \ .: Q) .J~ 2 ;'1 IG . §¡ ~ ëi5 :\ \. ... -,... ,--- ",...."' Pole Ordering Infon..cttion and Specificatio...i ess I eSL Stepped Aluminum Pole for Single Top Crook 8Yi 34' 20' 1%' 37 %'x15'+3' 12' 3' 26 20 15 12 10 8y," 34' 2() 1'1. 37 ',,'x15'+3' 12' 3" 21 16 12 9.77.9 By," 34' 20' 1%" 37 %'x15'+3' 12' 3' 1B 13 9.B 7.76.3 BYi 34' 20' 1%" 37 %'x3O' +4' 12' 3" 14 10 7.7 6.04.8 BYi 34' 2() 1%" 32' %'x30' +4' 12' 3' 946.5 47 3527 Pol' CO! No aM Moc""g Fm"" Ordering Example: For Standard CSS I CSL Pole CSS10-534188A I DB-P I 1-2 3 ~- Pole Catalog Numbers: For RA1l Luminaires only ~~ðÆg Æ å ~ o~ ~ VJ g "0 g 8 U ~à: U U - « i iñ Q " " " CD J~'Jt ~~"-' ",I" / - '. ~j--c:CJCCC=è Pole Catalog Number " aJ .-Y2 X2 Pole Step i I ~ ¡'Õ ð ¡¡; " S aJ :c 0> I.,,; '6 c '" § Õ aJ2 :1' :g,' -6 o~ ~ VJ 0 "0 ~ 8 U ~à: u U - i iñ Q " " " x X X1 X2 Y1 Y2 195' 13' 64' 6' 4' 25' 16.7' B.3' 6' 4' 30' 20' 10' 6' 4' .188' 10Yi 46' 30' 20M 32' %'x30'+4' 14' 188' 10Yi 46' 30' 2'M 37 %,x3Q'+4' 14' 250" 1Q'!, 46' 30' 2'M 37 ',,'x3Q'+4' 14' 5' 15 10 7.7 5.94.6 5' 9.8 64 4.3 3.022 5' 117.14.73223 V2 r"~~ ,,;., ""l ~, * ¡ APPROVAL 1 ¡ Ì, ì CRC/// (0 ~ ¡ ,I Signatur~ /.' = I I t~_ä'~~""'~~"-~" . ", .._G~S.~~:::~~~~~~_J NOTE; All allowable pole and fixture EPAs (Effective Projected Area, which IS Fixture Area x Drag Factor) are derived Irom the AASHTO standard (American ASSOCiation 01 State Highway and Transportation Officials) Responsibility lies with the specifier for correct pole selection based on local codes and standards tor the job location (See page 26) , Thickness at V1 section, X1 -~---~ 2 Mounting Arrangements: Plan View . Mounting Cat No EPA RA 17 RA25 A 08 1.5 ~ '0 aJ ALLOWABLE POLE EPA' ro5.~Ia;C';:::g" Õ "00 - ~ ~ 50>0---- 15 u~ ... :¡¡ :$ § ~ U 0. ~ 0 Æ 0 " u ;¡ ~ 0 aJ ~ ;¡ ALLOWABLE POLE EPA' ðl~ða;C';c-g" ,,50>0;;;;;;;; 1) Ug ... ., '" := ;: U i'i ~ 0 aJ . Gusting Wind Equivalent - ;¡ Wind Map Steady Wind - := f) K'M LlG>mNG 'NOTE; ALLOWABLE POLE EPA tor lobslte wind conditions must be equal to or greater than fixture mount EPA Pole Ordering Inforrllation and Specifications CAS I CAL Stepped ðlumiDumEQJ~"!or Side Mount Crooks .. Ordering Example: '-;or Standard CAS I CAL Pole Pole Catalog Numbers: CH x X2 X1 1 ~, æj' Y2 Pole Step Y1 Hand Hole Base Cover / ¿Å.S'; ;;:,';';;;. ,,;;;:. J~ .. ...' ~~'. ~ (u 1-2 3 4 C( /JI J ' ------:~ y~ or RA17 Luminaires only ALLOWABLE POLE EPA' . 2 Mounting Plan V,ew. 8f + Arrangements: . .. Mounting Cat No A B Y C 8 EPA RA17 0'.8 1.6 2.4 2.S RA25 1.5 30' 4.5 5.2 --- - -.'" ~ I" ~ - '" 0 "00 :S'" '" - uç .... :¡: :;¡ 0. 0 '" '" w c ~ 0 ~ ~ '" S a ~ 0 .;¡ ~ ~ ö Æ.g f ~ tS ð¥, ~ UJ a ~O ~ "8 u ~ò: u U - r iìì " u u u c- g ':f '" õ w 1:> (j 0 m '" õ - - - w > 8 w ~ m '" '" '" '" ;'! :: Pole Catalog Number X X1 CAS1D-534188 10' 65' CAS12-5341BB 12' 8' CAS14-5341BB 14' 93' CAS16-5341BB 16' 108 CAS2D-5341BB 198 13' X2 Y1 Y2 38 5' 3.4' 188' SY¡ 4' 5' 3.4' 188' BY¡ 47' 5' 34' 18S' Sy¡ 58 5' 34' 188' 8Y, 64' 5' 34' 188' Sy¡ 26' 25' 1%' 32" '/ÚI5'+3' 12' 26' 25' 1%' 32" '/ÚI5'+3' 12' 26' 25' 1'1i 3.2' WxI5'+3' 12" 26' 25' 1'1i 32" 'IÚ30'+4' 12' 26' 25' 1'1i 32" '/.x30'+4' 12' 3' 26 20 15~¡.2.~ 3' 21 16 12 9.779 3' 18 13 98 7.7 6.3 3" 14107.7604.8 3" 946.5 4.7 3.52.8 For RA25 Luminaires only ALLOWABLE POLE EPA' '" S.'" 0; 13 :: g ':f 0 "00 - ~ ~ ~ 8~R;;;;;;;; a c '" '" ;! :: u 15. ~ 0 '" m :;¡ ö ~ ~ '" 'ô:S ~ w f ~ ~ ~i fc ð ~ ~ 8 ~~ Pole ~ouu- Catalog m r iìì " Number X X1 X2 Y1 Y2 u u u CAL20-64188 195' 13' 64' 6' 4' 188' 1Oy¡ 37' 36' 2'1" 32" Wx30'+4' 14' 5' 15 10' 7.7 5.94.6 - CAL25-64188 25' 16.7' 8.3' 6' 4' 188' lay¡ 37' 36' 2'M 32" Wx30"+4' 14' 5' 9.864 43 3.02.2 CAL25-64250 25' 16.7' 83' Õ 4' 250' lay¡ 37' 36" 2'1,,' 32" 'I.x3Q'+4" 14" 5' 149.8705.2 4.0 CAL3Q-64250 30' 20' 10' 6' 4' 250' 1Oy¡ 37' 36" 20/,,' 32' '1,x3Q'+4' 14" 5' 117.14.73.223 CAL3D-64400 30' 20' 10' 6" 4' 400' 10Y¡ 37' 36' 2'1,,' 32' 'l,x3a"+4' 14" 5' IS 12 9.1 6.75.2 '" a m ~ .;¡ NOTE: All allowable pole and fixture EPAs (Effective Projected Area, which IS Fixlure Area x Drag Factor) are derived from the AASHTO standard (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Offic"ls) Responsibility lies with the specifier for correct pole selection based on local codes and standards for the Job location (See page 26) , Thickness at Y1 section, Y2 section is .188" , Pole reinforced, to 40' above base, to 400' remaining Y1 section is 250', Y2 section IS .18S' Gusting Wind Equivalent - ;! Wind Map Steady Wind - ;'! 'NOTE: ALLOWABLE POLE EPA for lobsite wind conditions must be equal to or greater than fixture mount EPA. . Proportion Guide 70 to 400 Watt / 10' to 30' Poles This proportion diagram is intended to help visualize and select the best Era system to satisfy aesthetic requirements, Rémember, the pole height also affects performance; the higher the fixture is mounted. the greater the light throw, If poles are mounted on concrete pedestals such as In parking lots, the height of the pedestal must be considered in selecting the pole height 32' ~ ~ 26' 24' 22' 20' . 18' 16' 14' RA17 CSS10,534188A 12' RA17 CAS16,534188A 10' 8' 6' 4' . 2' 0 0 GRADE .- -,-- ---, ------- ---- RA25 SAL30,64250B RA25 CAL25,64250B RA17 SAS20-534 188B 0 0 ----------------- ~----- -------- K'M UGH"NG Mounting Configurations Crook Arms CSS/CSL Single Top Crook CAS I CAL Side Mount Crook ~v ':1 ~. -- 1.'., The. lumlnaire head IS bolted to , the crook arm with two large . . stainless steel bolts. . 1A . 1A .. 26 1W The pole base is double welded and Includes a full cast cover 8f + The pole base is double welded and Includes a full cast cover 3Y 4C - . 11 8 Integrated Design Complimentary Detailing . Integration Era design approaches ail detailing as integral pieces of the whole. From the use of its clean beil shape lor the Optical Housing and exposed cooling surfaces on the Bailast Housing, to the detailing 01 the mounting arms and poles, Era IS complete. Combining proven mechanical features with a highly styled package without sacrificing either performance or aesthetic design is a difficult task. Era answers this challenge, with flexibility to satisfy a wide range of architectural tastes. The lummire, mounting arms, and poles were developed with shared detailing and complimentary mating components. This approach produces a complete design that is robust in style and mechanical integrity. 1W Wall Mount CSS/CSL Single Top Crook --' . '," CAS/CAL Side Mount Crook I~ ¡ I "'.~ I!l ~ ¡ , ¡ í J. ! SAS/SAL Swept Arm Mount -l\"~'..'..".... i .- . 8' KJM UGHT<NG Developed in response to èlients' specific needs. this series ofsmall landscaping lu"'inairesoHers an artractive blend oltraditional,styling and state,aHlie,art phatO""'rics that makes them the ideal solution to a wide range of lightingneeds, Designed to enhance the salety of an envirohment, thesestúrdy; easy, to,maintain bollards also meeta nu",ber 01 other objectives In terms 01 estlietics, efficiency and quality, BOR80 Bollard Defat s ' 71/Z' 'ii9immll .~~ Ë ~i ~~ê ~~ UM w- Anchor bolts 5/8,12" BOR80 lamp Guide Wattage SO MH,me'",m BORBD 10 MH,me'",m 100 MH,me""m 35 HPS me'",. 50 HPS,me'",m ------ 10 HPS,me'",m 100 HPS, me',"m Tlie BDR80'. bollard senes accommo. dates H.I.D. or Incandescenllamps up to WOW HPSbaliastsfeatucea-40F°1-40C'Ilamp starting capac,ty with a h'gh pow", lactor 0190% and operate wrthin ANSI trapelordall,m,ts, MH ballasts featuce a .20Fol.30C'I lamp starting capac,tywith a h,gh powerlactor 01 90%. All ballasts are Ulcecognrzedand CSAcert,lied The ballasl rs Integrated In the bollard's base BOR80,TCBI w,th TBC1 base cov", ~! m TBC2 base cover BOR80 Bollard The BOR80 trad,tional bollard consists 01 cast.alumlnum louvers and top cover mechan,cally assembled on a one, piece cast,alum"um base A cast,alum,num access door permits easy access to the Intenor olthe base The lamp is protected by a glass enclo. suce "srde the louvers S,licone gaskets ace used at the base oltheglassenclosuretoensure weatherproof,ng Decorat'" cast. aluminum bolt covers are supplied wrththe bollard The BOR80 bollard rs Ul and CSA approved Glass enclosure Gl,O Dpalln glass enclosuce - ! -.::[ BOR80,W '~ ~"D-', , ~! ~O~ ~! U ~, ,- ~ w- "D-"~ - . Anchor bolts: 3/8.12" B.C,from:4318to51/2'ï11lto140mml BOR80 Options FS Fusing Icon,ultlumec! BCl' Bollardheadonly IN" 65/8"1168mmlw,deroundbase Venable height IBDR80-W onlyl lrom ""1380 mInI to 48'11220 mInI. mr'125mmlme"men" 8all,"rs "moteu, to 2"(610mm( H15 15"1380mmlmm,h"9ht H48 48"11220mmlm"h"9h' DSH' Castalummum decorat,ve sltere Inon.lummousl ---- OR Duplexceceptacle 1120 volts only! GFI Derplex receptacle w,th ground lault mterrupter 1120 volts onlyl BCHl 1 Chain handle BCH2 2Chalnhandlesat1811 BCH2A 2 Ch,in handles at 911 BCH3 3 Chain handlesat 1211 BCH3B 3 Chain h,ndles at 911 BCH4 4 Chain handles PH] Bernon type photoelectn~ IP Interror palnlmg 01 bollard VPA Vandalproof scre",,~ TBCl Dpnonal decor",ve base cover ~ TBC2 Opl,onaldecoral,ve base cover . Consull lactory lor details . BOR80 Orderiog Sample . ",meo ,"""..rhc",hr""""""" m"""'",ehoo9' ,he moo"""""", 'CO"" 01", ,co"""."hoo, "'" 0""""'" Rain or shine. summer or winW. 00 the wateriront or inland' regardless of the environment and weather coodi, tions.these attractive boilard, deliver optimal periormance. Featuring sturdycoostruction and outstanding ease of maintenance, CANDBboliards are available. in a varietY of contemporary versions providing the design flexibility to harmonize b,autifullywith their surrOundings wh.ile providing th, ,ffecti,. lighting yoU seek. CANDB1 1011'" r- 1257 mml -, '" 1----¡U9 mml-1 ,~ .E ~i 7111" 1191 mml CANDB Lamp Guide Wattage CANDB 50 MH,mo'"m 70 MH.m""m 100 MH.m""m 35 HPS. m""m 50 HPS, mo'"m 70 HPS.m",um 100 HPS.m.'"m The CANDBtM Candela bollard senes accommodates HID. or Incandescent lamps "p to 100 W. HPSbaliastsleaturea.40F'I,40Cllamp sta"ing capaCIty with a hIgh power lactor 01 90% and operate within ANSI trapezoidal limits. MH ballastsleature a .20r¡.30COI lamp stMing capacity with ahlghpowerfactorol90%Allbaliasts are UL recognlled and CSA cemfled The ballast IS Integrated In the bollard's base CANDB Base Details ~ ~1}, JI ~~ ~O~ ~~ ë. "1}/' ~ CANDB2 "" ,--- 1305 mml------' '" '-1229mml-', ~I ,~ CANDB3 14" 1356mml '" '---¡mm;;;)I . )1/'" (191 mmJ CANDB Bollard The Candela CAN OBI bollard head conSISts of a Fresn,I,type boraSiIICa" lens or a round borosiltcate prismatIC refractor, surrounded by four rods "d a cast,alummum dISk. The CANDB2 bollard's optical system is protected by four rods and two downward sloping decoratIVe cast, aluminum louvers The CANOB3 bollard's head has lour rods. a disk and a decorative cast, alummum sloped covae. TheCANDB4boliard'sheadhasfour rodssuppo"a decoratIVe cast. aluminum sloped louver The cast' aluminum lumlna"e base and rover lit snugly at both ends 01 the optical system. and Slltcone gaskets are used to ensureweatherprooling The bollard head assembly Iils on an extruded aluminum pole with an outSIde d"meterof41/2"'1114mm)andawall thICkness 011/8' 13 mml. The bollard assembly is welded to a cast.alum'num base covae. This bese cover is anchored to a cast.alumlnum base plate by luur screws CANDBI, CANOB2, CANOB3 and CANDB4 Candela bollards are UL and CSA approved ~I "~ L...2~ (191 mml CANDB Dptical Systems . . RR Dptics Round borosilicate refractor SymmetricallVI Asymmetrtcalllill Asymmetrical 11111 with medium deflector RR3LD; Asymmetrtcalllill with large deflector RR5; RR3; RR3MD; =- FRN Dptics Fresnel lens FRN; Clear Fresnel lens FRNB; Blue Fresnsel lens (Lom","'m,',',') . Anchor bolts; 3/812"' B.C Irom43/8t051/2"1111'o14Omml CANDB Ordering Sample . L,m" ""'"" ""rt"""""""" m"""I", ",.",'h. m"ulo",rto, """'°""",'vc"wtthovt"",o""",tl," _QOMPQSITIQ @PLAN 1, 3, 4, 5, & 6a APPRO L Sf\ - - -I( : ~~N . I ORe /~ ~. E¡EVATIONS ONLY I Signature ~;:¿¿-,.Ii MURANO , > , Çe.sa Manager J t C/C/ CUPER INO CALIFORNIA +", '."',', '. ,. '.. ,'" .', ,- " , ,~r.=2ÔO4õfm:()öO>"'~' "'" .!,..,o>....=.~'" 1 CENTEX HOMES 4/23/04 VVILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS INC @ 2004 _COMPOSITION @PLAN 1, 3, 4, 5, & 6a "',"1:...""""""'" APPROv. IÎ' ;? "04 11 Appf lion Nu (¡) ~ ' ! CRC De -, E~E V A T ION SON L Y Signature <.. . URANO as8 Manager L/ L / .' ."QUPÆ.. INO CALIFORNIA ~"=""~OÖ'4Õ8Õ.'ÓÔ""'""'.' ' .".,.. " 2 CENTEX HOMES 4/23/04 \NILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS INC @ 2004 _COMPOSITIO- @PLAN 1, 3, 4, 5, & 6a SCIA SI ING STUCCO VERTICAL SIDING TRIM ~ - App ¡cation moor : DRC (p I ò. . ,/ /-=->~., : I Sf t é/~)?~~' EUEVATIONS ONLY gna ure . ',,""-, ~, "; ~UR' AND ô ~ Case anager JI1 c,~.,... "'""~et1 . INO, CALIFORNIA 2004080.00 3 CENTEX HOMES 4/23/04 \NILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS INC @ 2004 COMPOSITION @PLAN 1, 3, 4, 5, & 6a @ PLAN 2 & 6b ! i ORC I ; 1 EJEVATIONS ONLY URANO I ç~.e~I3JINO, CALIFORNIA 4 CNETEX HOMES 4/23/04 'I (---- '-- 'c '~""~~'2ðÔ4Ö80.00 "" WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS INC @ 2004 -COMPOSITION @PLAN 1, 3, 4, 5, & 6a D E R _J TRIM APPA í\L (OAC . . ELI VATIONS ONLY r Signature~,/- . URA NO ft".,.... L/ L - C.at;eMa geCUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA -'.~~2'ðO4(l80:00"'"""~w" ",,-~.":--.;;.J 5 CNETEX HOMES 4/23/04 VVILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS 'NC @ 2004 _COMPOSITIO @PLAN 1, 3, 4, 5, & 6a R '.=.T".""""'" ,"- r APPRO I\L I I CRC Signature 4/23/04 VVILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS 'NC @ 2004 , , ----t-m if r, I APPROVAL ! II CRC I: ; I Signature ii \I. <> ,'... X-LJl"Lu..L¡LLi1. \ 1\ \ ' v '/~ ~,~~ I G"' , OG JY\ ':¡' II v,i'I' L'/ I I OG OG ~ '- I I' i ~ 'I v~ . ~~L- ~~n ,-,~~~ 'I " OG. , OG TI ~ Eol ' I . ',~ ". T. ,,"~ " '¡g,: , '"", , OG ,"',.,,' .~:' 1II/,"":."III,IIITTlTTfITT I llL'::6m{':-II" ;¡ (cv J:I,III - "'- "'" C'_~C~Jì111 ¡lUll II , . '"'m I ~ II' '" i ~--.e: . . . , , "---"r't~ I I d=ii: ,,¡ ,..,.., i V. I 'i ~, .,1 :, , ", I 'T1::> ,- ~DD I " "~ñlD,, rilr",,1 'I {'L, 1--' ",1 -" =-""~ """, ~ 11 , ,~fR,¥ JEI¡E '[JIlL C '"'" ~ 4J! "_'1 '"' ',' :J:.~ ~- 0, ,",01 0 h It: :š II' '. '04' , " Pd'l. é! :~,_~¿_2~~c~ i Ii 1,1 , 1 '~r~=?1 '+ '1,'" I c'" "eo>:,1m",\ i.,"", þ'fo", "'eo>« tf"""'" ~"','""",~n ÓJoocq:¡"'T 'I -, :,.H--- , 'II I , . ~ .~' II!, ~. 'rue~, ,'c,-.' b--h- T'" IT '"1: - IT! Ii ' IB,'", ',< ,-- .l11L,~' "'I H .. n Iv D, - hl~ ,,!~, " ------, I,,' JI,'¡ :Ln 4=01, !i .. ,C;;L 'r lb þ' ~"A~"d,,".,I!- ,'1 1\IIJ f' l, I T - IL 'Jf ¿ .. 'I "{ 11 rI rl "1 ~,; r.~ HI ' fA '" t;.--H r-u fI-- ¡ot L ~. !; I ,: I !' ~. JIll qJl 1[1'L '/:~ ~~ ~"ï G::i;F! 't'- -, ~,= '==", .' " I ~ . i. J,~ ~'-$"', l ~ Iff I" ~: 1m.1] ';~' 8!U ~ (1: , itl! r-,O:::: "'I ~ ~ c,¡~ -"~-CF~ tIIJ j,-- IT'b.. ,'E"; ò_, '" " I ¡-- ~ - nd:::r:: '" {Ii 0 '" -'~ '" I ' 0,0 q,c...., le" ø' ,'- n=c1 ¡ , :';"~ii'MTJ:\ "l h~" ~. [, . 'fII-cf ':'¡'" Jj' . ~:.I..., ~" , I 1 Il~, ,J", i I\'", "'" '"'" I 4: . '"'" n='b n ~Ul11 ~ ""...., ,.... J..?' \.- : '"" JI d 1i1H11 R ìif" c. 0 'k .. ~~, "Y, TD' c ' Ii [' r-n ~ 1 ~) I '""'. 10 ør'¡ T 'I" U: I I I II J J '"'" [lV li< ~ w ~ uc:: ~ §, ". ~ ~ :',,' '" r ~ ~l J" 30 & ,1_LiO ~ ~ Œl .\ ø I k'VJ II c, , '..\/ '---!i R EL r.;:;::; 1 ~ '" , b I 0 ]'1 ""IL1,'~"- u4=C: \'-. ;~' ø "v ~'l::r1h,"'V'-u-'~ fr"'" i'1>, ""'\P-..II!'IIIBI i,l~ . ¡. 'I U '" -' 1 ' ';""'J"l "1 ~ I¡ I J " r=r=f\O ¿DO DO ,,----j '¡ """ : : ; .h .. ~b¿ -P::;:- ~~, :. ,'. >- ~ ~ I í ~ '"'" ~ , II '"'., If '"'... I:J" ~þ ,"""-,,þ~ '"" t¡J¡ '" ' : I ~{,] l It v ~ ' - . If . Ii\. ~ . . I~ ' -, . -!II IIIt:::'J , I -- 11, ", I ~'[ J ' I H I H ,...-----r H ,on, , ::I::Í::> U qr °ocl,-I ',,' " "(f Ihl,'~" ,",n -- --, :,,'~"'í"'~'f:" ¡ i I !:-----'" I "'r;I~ --c I""",, 'LF , ,---J, . 8:' , I ~L:~.. ' '" .," 1111 = c-"--,- -, : -'."-,d' " , .". ' 0 '" . "-" ~, ="" " . "'he ",". N i I Q I J ~\, r"'- r~ '"'" ill 31J, I I. ~ Jr_"- '"'. r l~'" '==. J 1=='. j ~ . '" ~ ~ c:.J :, '" l, .!IIi1If, ~ 'il "¡! l - [ If -- I (.Jr r!1 'h '"'" [" .-Jil Jl I-I~ ~ '" '"" '"'. """ tj \ " ~t:Þ I '"'" - '" , "cñ5~, I - , I ~ ,"",'" FI, ,"",'" I, '"'~ I:.. '~J ~ II" ~' ~ L, , Crb" -r-"IL" '" , , ':. ~ '~LJ.j , I b " '" I ~D c -- 0 1~' '" \ ",.. "" '. ~ '.. ,-., '" """.,"k-o" . ¥ I ,I<~-"" J2 m " r n' D' J .J '" '" rcuo '," '"'" r, "',-u'~"',~" -O""""c ~,,'~~"'~, )','~~I I J i~ OG ~~ ' r f' "'~J\ ----'--L5 . L ~ 0 ~o 1"'1" -..r ~ V~ "L .. -, - ~ )!) "~ """* " 'OG OG '" ' ~~r- . i ,:;:0:"3 C') ;r I," , '"'" ¡ " cD t'K~'-"'" í loG ---;::c, ~ CE!?u u 'f )-, OG,) 'f ! ,or J(' ) , . \ Å-i,~, / ,)~J "\ r ;I)'"' , ~ - :"1 ~ I', q" I +''.In '. ". . ---" -+ lJ..o.\:;1 " j, ')~ ----..:J_--- -, -------- '-h t=~2 I ~¡( . ) 1"'",, ì',-"-.T"."t.-r-,..,'-/'-k: /.' X/ /~lt ~)~",{,,~)o.j i~, ~~--l!--:"'-_/'-='----------- 0 . j:.1, / ).~/' ~~...r ~/ ..J. o./\c, v.L....1 >~,' ""~ . c." 1>- i;ji ~ , '"" .,c' °,,-",<= ""\ . . "J -. "J..EeENI:> ~ - -CHTor,",", _....._~' . == LO. LO' ........,."""""""",,-' Cl\ "'."""""" ~ ",a"""""" NO""""" -... """'" lOX D - """"""""0I1E"'-"""""""-""""""""""" _1'eNO1H&. ....-- ....""""'" LOT ND ^""",,IATIOH ....,.,.,.,." - """IOu. """"AIH.""- AI<> - OXCS'T""" ............... """""'"- ....-- ....""""'" LOT ND """"'""""- ....,.,.,.,." 'M"". OF "" -....oT - ...... """"....... """"'" .""- ....-............,., _Þ«rfI'eNO,,"- ..........."'-""""""""""'" """...-,....,.,.,.,.", ...-.W """""GC5'OF--ND"""""""', oœ<_"",,"-"'-)- "'A HU-""""-""_ND """-"",,, ~ --'------"""""'" 1"IC«e'"",",H5- """"u.""""-""_ND"",,-,", 0_1---_"__0,","" I---~ :::-._^8C«O @ ~\:::= :: ::"" ..:.J-@ ì -~ owr_-- @@ --- owr..--. LOA ..) ~~,' ',-" DRAWING No. .------ r!~g~J.: I'""""""'~"""""~ --~ ~~;;~-- 0 I o=-;~ MURANO FENCING STUDY PLAN SHŒr -'- or .L......, 'OB No,Clli03-01 DATE, "/13/04 FL1.1 CENTEX HOMES IWJIB()"I'DRM: CUPDTlNO. CWlORNIA NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ~ ~ . " ¡, <g "'tJ (. ~ » ;, :S " ~ ~;' ~ ~ ~ u I ~§ l._--- , ~ ~ ~i~ I~! [: +-2 d ''IIIIH:¡ 1l¡I~tJiI .fi~i!!!;1 I!JMI!h "'IIII¡, 1'hlf'!f ~ :-m n 'I'i' 'I G ¡¡i1 i B II Ii 'I ~ !~ I i ~ n~ h~§S I§ 15> ~Z "'0 t ~ ¡ * ~ 8'55 WAY ~ @ ILOG"," ^ I II 0 ¡ ¡ I ~\ 0 G I ¡ ¡ I I H~~I ; ~ n ~ m~ ~ Ii I I mi I ~ I ~ I ! @ I I nil '1 ¡' ~H II ' II !; ~ II wu II ~ II ! ~ @~ JI .-.--...." . 0 > :D "tI 0 ~ 2 :Þ ï , " I - II~ (""'""'~""'-~ .f APPROVAL \ s'f\-a:>o4 -I) Appli~~ion Number ORC W ~\~ Signatur? "~~~7 ~~/ S9 ag ¿"/ ~' --,-,...-,=,,", , MISSION PAYER c.OLOR SAMPLES~ ~>Þlv<¡:-'\"'a~.)LE '\'A¡)~ , t """""",,INO ARGI£D -...aLl" ,."..."", PI"""," ÆNGE ",,",ARE PI"""," ÆNc>e .~---.- ~~~: I CAA"'crUM=",,~ ~-~ --- -- .- _w~-, -- --~ " I "=,\~'I.:'" MURANO CENTEX HOYES ....... ..... CIJPI!RIIIIO."""",,",,- ~~'.Ù."'""""'-"'-""'- "-"-...--=.-..-,"-",""",,' """"-ED PI"""," ÆNGE DRA1IJIIG No. FENCING AND PAVING IMAGES FL1.3 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SHD:T _OF-8 IOBNo,~. DATE. 05/10, ~------~.._--- - _.__._-----~.-- .-.---------- .--------- : II ! § . ¡ " ~ !, J!i i ¡ ¡ Itii ~o j~}j¡!: m m ' « Z VJ "" w 0 2 ~ z ::¡ 0 <c « :r: ¡::¡¿ "'~-~ >< ::> z w ~ ~ 'Z ~ w a U ;L ~~ ~n @~~~ ~ m m rJiùT ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ¡ '-P~ ~ ~ ddn~ h H~ f~H~n u ni \1 !:II 111Mt!:R ~I¡:i æBj I I I . ~ i ¡~ ~ " ~~! ~~ ~ @ u ~ ~~ t I II ~ ~ ~I ~~ ! n¡ ~ ~ ~; dj ¡¡ "i~ ¡ ~-' II I~ II i ~~ ~ I Ë~iH U ~ ~" ~ ~~ ~!~ "hnh ~ ~ d di Ip .n~PU~ I ;> g ~ ~.~ .~ ~ . ~~Œ~ ~ ø ~ !: ~ m ~n p¡ ~g;ln!d~h I~ ~ ~ Sp .~~nL~~p@~!~o ~ ~ ! i d ~ ~n mU dUU In I ~ I I ß 'il~IIJ"'~~ § I I I z ,.... :) C\ 0... IE - '" ~ en iJ; ~ --I ~ ~ ~ :i '" ~ 15 II: W Ô ~ ill I- ¡;; c ~ « ~ <J4J :::æ: Qc z-. "'_.' .L"~- ~ I m Cf ' -~' I ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~~~. ~ ~ ~'" ~ I ~ a ~ ~U~! ~ i 2 ~.". ~ è ~ >13132 ~ ~ ~ Â r~1 ~n H~ Ih ¡ t r Ii ~ '~ a: .a Il. 0 <\I 0.. a: C '< C ~ c 0 0 j, . . . " ': "..c~.~m._-."..:. ,(\I'M -Œ- _?"'::_~",-4--:~_.- ...L -:-7 I ~ ~ II' {¡ J. II 2 ~ ~ ~ 1 J 2 ~ ~ B :J p !i I ' I ! 'i ! : I-I I I ~ ~ I FOR LEGEND SEE L2.1 I .. "-"~"=~~- ~--'<'~~'" ,~" :i ~ I ! DRC I Signature APPROVAL f\::>ì~ - ?JA - \ \ Application Number V/\;:;¡\q .,,}~ 7<~ . ,:' .> ,/. Case anager "'~ ¡ II"""""""""""" ~: ~;~~;~::~:::::~: MURANO IN CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA BY CENTEX HOMES REVISIONS .ð.IDESCiJI'TJONIDAl1' ¡BY £ REVISION xx-xx-xx MATERIALS PLAN JOB NO. """"-01 SHEET DRAWN AS I ?? c '! , ~. j! 1 ~ ¡ \ g, ! ' , i, ~,,¡ i Ii ¡!¡Ii ~"';;¡' ", 'I~ :'!: Vi I ~ UJ 0 2 ::Ë z ::;¡ 0 « ð>-I eo:: ¡:; -"' >< -- 0 W ...J ~ I- ~ b2 Z w w ~ U u . R ~ z « ...J IL <=) Z ~ « ...J IL ,... q: ...J Iii w ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1\ ~ ~ ~ ~ <1«1 :i' 0 -- ~CI -' ~ 0 a: a. ~ ~ Ii ~ H n -:=~--;.---- ~ ~ ~~ w I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ n i ~ n d ~ ~L~ ~ ~J ~~~IHUU ~m d I ~ ~ II i i I II n ~-" g ~ ; ~ ~ ~ I !m~m~m~~~~nmd ~l~~ ~ ~ i 8 ~ ~ ~ ! ~ M - ~ <! - q-<~ ~p ~ d 3 ~ I ~ I .: ~ d h ~~n. ~~h ~hH ~~ ~ i. I q ~ ¡ i I ¡ i ! ~ I ~ ~ i i I ~ I ¡ ~ i Iii I i~nh!~;Uj~P§h!li! ~M i I ~ ~ ~ I~ p : I Ht ~~m . i ! i ¡ ¡ ! ¡ !"~! ~ ! ~ '1 ~ ~ ! ~ ! ~ ! ~ ! ~ ! ~ !~~!~~!;~~ !~;~~ !;~t~ ~ ;::::;::::~~:;: II I Hdn ~..~~~ z-. II -, -,""""ZC<" A\1'M '" ----.--- -ð--------OC---'---' ---- -", ------- ---- - --- --- --- _n -- " , I' ~ I ¡ ~ 1;: I , o~ I FOR LEGEND SEE L4.1 I I cœoocc< ,~"",,<ô, 'NC ""'~, .,"=,' '~",", , ~'""n"" .",'" ,.." o~"" ~:;~~~:~,;:::;:'~"~.,"m""'~' . I . ¡:?i:.,:':;.~;~~. Lvl 00 MU RANO IN CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA BY CENTEX HOMES ENTRY PLANTING ENLARGEMENT SGALE. 1"-10'-0" '-'~-"-~---""~--~~_._--,- APPROVAL \\<~~ '?J::À; - \ I \,P.lication Number ORC \.0 ::;¡,\Ot\- Signature L, ~ ~ ,~ /' /' Case a;ía/¡er REVISIONS 6IDESCR1P1lONIDATE IBY Æ\ RfYI51ON xx-xx-xx ~ PLANTING PLAN JOB NO. GEND""" SHEET DRAWN ;os I ..... Ebðtj ~EQ ""AGED BET_Nl END POSTS 6' MAX VA IES AT 5" POST n'P "'" ¥-J' ,- N 4 PICKET FENCE 5/4".1'-0" APPROX. 12' "IDE n'P FINISH 6AADE """" PIGKETS 2X4 >-IOOD RAIL TOP AND BOTTOM, EUTT TOP RAILS TOeETHE" GENTERED ON TOP OF POSTS. TOENAIL BOTTOM RAILS TO POSTS 4X4 _ATED DOUGLAS FIR >-IOOD POST SQUARE PIGKETE ANGLED PIGKETS """NTRY PILLASTER WFLAT ENTRY POSTS 1 r t^^^J 2X4 >-IOOD RAIL TOP AND BOTTOM ROUNDED PIGKETE WARGHED lRELLIS IX5 >-IOOD PIGKETS FINISH 6AADE ELEVATION-TYPE B SEE FENGE PLAN POR LOGATION ELEVATION-TYPE G I" DIAMETER MIN. PREFAB ,,/>-LV. STEEL FRAME J-------- GONTRAGTOR~ OPTION, DRIVE MOUNT ON 18'X12" PREFA!3 POSTS 5' INTO """,UND. "ALV. STEEL OR GONG. FENGE BASE n'P CDfR~JTRUCTION .$ TREE PROTECTION FENCE x < x ~ SIMPSON MET/>-L TIE. LGB44, """.,trO'9'1<.GOm, INSTALL PER MFR REGOMMENDATIONS 10". GONGRETE FOOTING GOMPAGTED sœeRADE NOTES, I. SET RAILS LEVEL, SET PlaETS AND POSTS PLUMB AND SQUARE 2. SET TOP OF PIGKETS AND POSTS LEVEL 5. LUMBER POSTS TO BE PREæJRE _ATED DOOOLAS FIR. PIGKETS AND RAILS TO BE I'ESTERNIRED GEDAR, STANDARD AND 6ETTER "RADE, 545 4. FASTENERS, HOT DIPPED "ALVANIZED 5. FINISH, SAND SMOOTH AND EASE ALL EXPOSED ""eES.PAINT - ONE GOAT PRIMER, T>-IO GOATS FINISH, WLOR, La" SHEEN """TE '*4 FINISH eRADE OF (b\ ~SIM PAVING WMPAGTED;<JEJeRADE, ""0; RELATIVE WMPAGTION GONTRAGTORS OPTION, c.oN5TRUGT FENGE O\JT OF GONTlNU0\J5 FA!3RIG "'TH POSTS IN eROUND. SAIN AGGEPTANGE OF THE OJoo<NER PRIOR TO PROCEED IN". USE 1-5/8' DIAM. ,,/>-LV. STEEL POSTS, II "AUSE FA!3RIG "ITH KNIXOKLED SELVA"E TOP . BOTTOM, TENSION "'RE AT TOP OF FABRIG, DRIVE POSTS 5' INTO eROUND . ~ ij¡ 'i' ~ II ;;;;;'~;;~::::"";:: ~:& ~¡~~:;;~;.". "" ~" SUR.,- BOULDERS 1/5 HEISHT IN 5U6<5RADE ~lL.r ' -- .M~ .1F MU RAND IN CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA BY CENTEX HOMES GOMPAGTED 5lIBeRADE,"O; RELATIVE GOMPAGTION BOULDER IN SAND .$ DG PAVING 5/4'.1'-0" ADJAGENT PLANTIN" AREA PER PLAN HEADER ill ~ PER PLANTING NOTES I' VERIFY WGIVIL ENGINEER AND eEOTE<;;HIG/>-L ENGINEER I\S,I\ - ô\.:CA -\ \ I['l~~~, PLAN VIE" c-' Signature DIAeoNAL LATTIGE /~ 2x2" RAIL. TOP AND BOTTOM OF LATTIGE Ix6" FENCE SOARDS. 1 ~1 4x4' PoST I IL, 1 n'p. . /::1 "---WNG. POST ~ N¡' 1 FOOTING ~ L. I ~ />-LL FASTENINæ TO BE ,,/>-LV. STEEL 5&RE><5. ~12'.j, '" ~~N~~A'it"S~~~OA~ =R ""ADE SEAL "ITH GLEAR SEAL F"" "ATI"R CONSTRUCTION DETAILS JOB NO. 0"""'-01 SHEET DRAWN AS L6.2 NOTES, I) ALL ",""",ERS TO BE ,""STERN RED "EDAR, STANDARD AND BETTER 6RADE, 545 AVAILABLE FROM <SOLDEN STATE LUMBER 2) ALL FASTENERS TO BE HOT DI~ <>ALVANIZED STEEL 5) SAND SMOOn< AND EASE ALL EXPOSED EDŒS 4) PAINT, ONE COAT PRIMER, TW::> COATS FINISH, COLOR, LO"'2~ WHITE - ARC;H FOR POSTS 6' APART ø MITER ED<>ES ~"':~~:~ND NAIL EACH SIDE TOENAILED TO TO ADJACENT TOP OF JOIST SIDE AND TO 6Xb ~ ~ POST TYP ~ :: :~KIN<5 BASE ;RIM PLAN ~ - 5xE> ARC;HED ~ JOIST "'" ~ \ PLAN 4Xb 6UXKING ATTA"H W (2) 112" X 6" LA<> BOLTS, STAG6ERED AND WUNTER SlINK 'xE> ARC;HED JOIST, GUT PROM ONE PIECE OF XI2 LUMSER, ATTACHED W (2) 1/2" X 5' LA<> BOLTS ST",,*RED E>' 6Xb POST 2X4 BASE ;RIM 24" S<2 FRE"AST """"'TE "AP, PACIFI" STONE. PC--ðOO-24, '""1'°olflo."'""",,' OR 'PPROVED EG1IJAL, GUT AND NOT"HED TO AC"EFT 6Xb POST STONE "LAD BASE TO MAT"H ARC;HITEC-TURE MORTAR BED ~ EG EG J"YP !", ßG ,EG TYP, ~,,~ I " - 'rD" ~ ~ '" VARIES SEE PLAN """"""TE FOOTIN<> >4 ""BAR - '" "LR ALL SIDES HORIZONTAL PIE"ES 16" O" ~~~c COMPACTED "-"GRADE == C)~,~~HED TRELLI S SIMq'\FLATPOSTS~ V BEYOND E>' 6Xb POST ~ BEYONDm_, , WJSTER BOX --=--0:=:-: UNIT E> DOOR OR '\ I_r=¡=___- " DOOR, SEE \ I i MATERIALS PLAN, MAILBOXE5'<ooM, ",OE>, '912 5/E>" "ARRIAeE BOLT, INSTALLED PER MFR" INSTRl!::-TIONS 24' "' X 5" H PRECAST CO""""TE WALL "AP 5=0 FINISH MORTAR BED MEMBER NOT"HED I" AND TOENAILED TO TOP OF JOIST 5xE> ARC;HED JOIST 6Xb POST 2X4 BASE ;RIM W CONTINUOUS SILI""NE BEAD SEAL AROUND TOP AND BOTTOM 24" SQUA"" FRE"AST """,,""TE ,,- STONE "LAD BASE TO MAT"H ARC;HITE"TURE PI"I<ET FENc-E TYPE A FINISH 6RADE FINISHED GRADE "ON"""TE FOOTING >4 REBAR - 5" "LR ALL SIDES HORIZONTAL PIE"ES 14' = COMPACTED 5læ6RADE _,' .. /, <, FRE"AST "ON"""TE "AP , I , "LUSTER MAIL BOX EJ.ðIS 6'-1" SIM 8 FLAT POSTS 6'-1" "LUSTER BOX UNIT E> DOOR OR 12 DOOR, SEE MATERIALS PLAN, MAILBOXES.COM, ",OE>, "'" "LUSTER BOX UNIT 16 DOOR, SEE MATERIALS PLAN FOR LOCATION, ~~~~~ , FRE"AST " CO""RETE "AP " i¡- N I~~-§ MURANO IN CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA BY CENTEX HOMES Î' ""~I"""--,,~-~<;',,",,"-"" ~---" == MAILBOX FIXTURE - 1/2"~ 1'-0" """,,""TE EN;RY PAn< CO""RETE FOOTING COMPACTED "-"GRADE NOTES. I) ALL MEMBERS TO BE WESTERN ""0 "EDAR, STANDARD AND BETTER <>RADE, 545 AVAILABLE PROM <SOLDEN STATE LUMBER 2) ALL FASTENERS TO BE HOT DIPPED <>ALVANIZED STEEL 5) SAND SMOOTH AND EASE ALL EXPOSED EDGES 4) PAINT, ONE COAT PRIMER, TW::> COATS FINISH, COLOR, LO", SHEEN WHITE FRE"AST CO",,""TE FINIAL, DURA ART STONE, SPHERE "-5, """-d",oort.to'Ð.oom lQ] I[Q]~~~~E "LAD E!..'o!< == ELEVATION f:\ ENTRY PllmASTER FRE"AST CONe-RETE PINIAL PINISH 6RADE PRONT ELEVATION/SE"TION ORC Signature ~2X4 MITER ED,",S NAIL EACH SIDE TO ADJAæNT SIDE AND TO 6Xi> POST TYP ~ BASE ;RIM PLAN :1 ~.'" ',.".-=i"""-}"Ë~;' ~ 5m JOIST ;" STONE "LAD BASE - R J 4X4 BEAM "'" MEMBER NOT"HED 1/2" AND TOENAILED TO TOP OF JOIST 5x6 JOIST ATTACHED TO POSTW (2)1/2"x5" LA<> BOLTS, ST""*RED 4X4 BEAM ATTACHED TO POST W (2)1/2",6' LA<> BOLTS, STA<>,",""D 6Xb POST 24" SQUA"" FRE"AST "O""RETE "AP STONE "LAD BASE TO MATCH ARC;HITEC-l1JRE i1ll EJ.tili 2X4 BASE ;RIM W CONTINUOUS SILICONE BEAD SEAL AROUND TOP AND BOTTOM 24" S<2 FRE"AST\ ~~~T~~: P"-E>OO-24, """poolflo""'Ð""t OR APPROVED EG1IJAL, GUT AND NOT"HED TO ACæPT 6Xb POST STONE "LAD BASE TO MATCH ARC;HITEC-l1JRE SE"TION ~ r::\ FLAT ENTRY POSTS ..- CONSTRUCTION DETAILS JO~ NO. "ENOS-OI SHEET DRAWN AS L6.3 DiAGoNAL LATTICE 2x2' RAIL, TOP AND SOTTOM OF LATTICE (4) 2"><:1" FULL LE",,'" BET"""N F05TS LATTICE (¡"xl!") DiAGoNAL 2x.' FENCE OOARD5 4x.' P05T POST TYP -' ~ '~ L" TíTt--CONC P05T ~." -~ FOOTINe ~ J<'2"J" Ii ALL FA5TENI",," TO BE eALV, 5TEEL """""'5, ~ d ~~NA~~~~5~~i:;;"';~~ ~ '*'ADE, 5EAL "'TH CLEAR SEAL FOR "'TEl< PROOFI"", SUBMIT 5AMPLE POI< 0"'""" APPROVAL 1/2"01'-0" SCREEN FENCE <--""~~----"-"-'-b { I ; I ¡ ~ ORe APPROVAL S:;,i1ature / I c~'"'" . """"", '" '" :;;:;,:::~::~:;:="",".:";::: ;~~ ~;::;:::¡::¡!,:O:':i"ro,".. .." ,.." ,,1.1 ,,;:;;1:,:;':;,";;;:- MURANO IN CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA BY CENTEX HOMES REVISIONS AIDlSC>JmoNIDATE IBY Æi REVISION XX-XX-XX CONSTRUCTION DETAILS JOBNO. CÐIO5-oI SHEET DRAWN AS I R LI. To: From: Subject: Location: Design Review Committee Gary Chao, Assistant Planner Application: EXC-2004-07 10376 Amistad Ct. Date:June 2, 2004 Project Description: Fence exception to allow a seven-foot fence in the front yard setback area. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of EXC-2004-07, based on the model resolution. DISCUSSION: According to the City's Fence Ordinance (16.28.030), any fencing within the front yard setback shall not exceed three feet high measured from the finish grade. The intent behind this rule is so that the residential neighborhoods will not appear as a gated community. The project site is located at the corner of Voss A venue and Amistad Court. By definition, the legal front yard is always along the narrower property frontage. In this case, Voss Avenue is the legal front yard even though functionally the Amistad Court frontage is being used as the front yard area. The applicant is requesting an exception to locate a seven-foot tall fence in the legally defined front yard area (Voss Avenue). Staff supports the exception since there is a similar existing neighborhood fencing pattern and that the exception is consistent with the intent of the Fence Ordinance. Prepared by: Approved by: Gary Chao, Assistant Planner ,^ Ciddy Wordell, City Planner [{d-~ 'â/c'ldi-U Enclosures: Model Resolution Plan Set 3- / EXC-2004-07 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR A FENCE EXCEPTION TO ALLOW A SEVEN-FOOT FENCE IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AREA. SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: EXC-2004-07 Ravin Checker 10376 Amistad Ct. SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Sign Exception, as described in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and compatible with the surrounding area; 1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title in that the proposed fence is consistent with surround fencing patterns and meets the intent of the ordinances since Voss Avenue frontage is really being used as a side yard; 2. That granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is materially detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare since it is consistent with the existing neighborhood pattern; and 3. That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of the prescribed regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the purpose in that the proposed fence will be setback from the property line at least 10 feet and will stay clear of the required 40 foot traffic view triangle; and 4. That the proposed exception will not result in a hazardous condition for pedestrian and vehicular traffic in that the fence will be setback from the property line at least 10 feet and will stay clear of the required 40 foot traffic view triangle; and 3-,~ Resolution No. Page 2 EXC-2004-07 June 2, 2004 5. The proposed development is otherwise consistent with the City's General Plan and with the purpose of this chapter as described in Section 16.28.010 in that it is consistent with the existing neighborhood patterns and the Amistad Ct. frontage is being used as the front yard area; and 6. The proposed development meets the requirements of the Santa Clara Fire Department and Sheriff's Department, and if security gates are proposed, that attempts are made to standardize access in that the proposed fence does not require fire and police review and no security gates are being proposed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application no. EXC-2004-07, is here by approved; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application EXC-2004-07 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of June 2, 2004, and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on the plan set as part of the staff report to the Design Review Committee dated June 2, 2004, except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. FENCING IN THE STREET SIDE YARD AREA No fencing higher than three feet tall shall be allowed in the street side yard area (first 20 feet set back from the property line along Amistad Ct.) since it is being used as a front yard. 3. BUILDING PERMITS The applicant shall obtain all the necessary building permits to construct a fence higher than six feet in height. 4. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), 3-~S Resolution No. Page 3 EXC-2004-07 June 2, 2004 has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of April 2004, at a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner Gilbert Wong, Chairperson Design Review Committee G\Planning\DRC\res\EXC-2004-01 res.doc 3-4- EXC-2004-07 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 158 OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR A FENCE EXCEPTION TO ALLOW A SEVEN-FOOT FENCE IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AREA. SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: EXC-2004-07 Ravin Checker 10376 Amistad Court SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Sign Exception, as described in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and compatible with the surrounding area; 1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title in that the proposed fence is consistent with surround fencing patterns and meets the intent of the ordinances since Voss Avenue frontage is really being used as a side yard; 2. That granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is materially detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare since it is consistent with the existing neighborhood pattern; and 3. That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of the prescribed regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the purpose in that the proposed fence will be setback from the property line at least 10 feet and will stay clear of the required 40 foot traffic view triangle; and 4. That the proposed exception will not result in a hazardous condition for pedestrian and vehicular traffic in that the fence will be setback from the property line at least 10 feet and will stay clear of the required 40 foot traffic view triangle; and Resolution No. 158 Page 2 EXC-2004-O7 June 2, 2004 5. The proposed development is otherwise consistent with the City's General Plan and with the purpose of this chapter as described in Section 16.28.010 in that it is consistent with the existing neighborhood patterns and the Amistad Ct. frontage is being used as the front yard area; and 6. The proposed development meets the requirements of the Santa Clara Fire Department and Sheriff's Department, and if security gates are proposed, that attempts are made to standardize access in that the proposed fence does not require fire and police review and no security gates are being proposed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application no. EXC-20O4-07, is here by approved; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application EXC-20O4-07 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of June 2, 2004, and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on the plan set as part of the staff report to the Design Review Committee dated June 2, 2004, except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. FENCING IN THE STREET SIDE YARD AREA No fencing higher than three feet tall shall be allowed in the street side yard area (first 20 feet set back from the property line along Amistad Ct.) since it is being used as a front yard. 3. BUILDING PERMITS The applicant shall obtain all the necessary building permits to construct a fence higher than six feet in height. 4. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), Resolution No. 158 Page 3 EXC-2004-07 June 2, 2004 has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of April 2004, at a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Commissioner Chen and Acting Chair Miller COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/ Ciddy Wordell Ciddy Wordell, City Planner /s/ Marty Miller Marty Miller, Acting Chair Design Review Committee G:\Planning\ DRC\res\EXC-2004-07 res.doc City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 (408) 777-3308 To: Mayor and City Council Members Planning Commissioners From: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Development Date: June 4, 2004 Subj: REPORT OF DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE FINAL DECISIONS MADE June 2, 2004 Chapter 19.136 of the Cupertino Municipal code provides for A eal of decisions made b the Desi Review Committee 1. Application EXC-2004-04; Alan Ford (Hewlett Packard), 11000 N. Wolfe Road Description Sign exception to allow the replacement of ten existing ground signs with new ground signs for an office/ industrial campus. Action The Design Review Committee approved the application on a 2-0 vote. This is effective June 2, 2004. The fourteen-calendar day appeal will expire on June 16, 2004. Enclosures: Design Review Committee Report of June 2, 2004 Resolution No. 156 Plan Set 2. Application ASA-2004-11; Jeff Jacobs/Centex Homes, 7308 - 7318 Rainbow Drive Description Architectural and Site Approval for final architectural and site details (including 8-foot tall fencing along portions of the project perimeter) on an approved residential development (formerly Saron Gardens). Action The Design Review Committee approved the application on a 2-0 vote. This is effective June 2, 2004. The fourteen-calendar day appeal will expire on June 16, 2004. Enclosures: Design Review Committee Report of June 2, 2004 Resolution No. 157 Plan Set 3. Application EXC-2004-07; Ravin Checker, 10376 Amistad Court Description Fence Exception to allow a seven-foot fence in the front yard setback area. Action The Design Review Committee approved the application on a 2-0 vote. This is effective June 2, 2004. The fourteen-calendar day appeal will expire on June 16, 2004. Enclosures: Design Review Committee Report of June 2, 2004 Resolution No. 158 Plan Set G:planning/Drcj060204 summaryletter.doc To: Design Review Committee Colin Jung, Senior Planner Application: EXC-2004-04 11000 N. Wolfe Road Date: June 2, 2004 From: Subject: Location: Project Description: Sign exception to allow the replacement of 10 existing ground signs with 10 new signs on the Wolfe Road Hewlett Packard Campus. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of EXC-2004-04, based on the model resolution. BACKGROUND: The Hewlett Packard Wolfe Road Campus is located on a 101 acre, three lot, block surrounded by four public streets: Wolfe Road, Homestead Road, Tantau Avenue and Pruneridge Avenue. 11 of the 12 buildings on the site are oriented to the interior of the property and surrounded by surface parking and a wide and tall landscape berm that obscures most of the buildings from public street view. The campus is served by 11 driveway entrances and internal circulation is accomplished through a network of driveways and pedestrian paths that link the buildings together. As the campus is very large with multiple buildings, the ten entrance ground signs are important for corporate identity and directing vendors, employees and customers where to go on the campus. The applicant is proposing to replace these 10 ground signs with 10 new signs. DISCUSSION: The chart below summarizes the existing signage data and signage proposal: Existin Ground Sign Proposed Ground Sign Sign Street Height Length Size IlIum.? Height Length Size Illum. ? No Location (ft~) (fÚ (sq. ft.) YfN (fÚ (ft~) (ft.) YfN 1 Wolfe 3 9 27 N 5 8.41 42.05 Y, external 2 Wolfe 3 3.5 10.5 N 6 2.75 13.44 N 3 Wolfe 3.66 11.04 40.4 N 7 10.58 74.06 4 Homestead 3 3.5 10.5 N 6 2.75 13.44 N 5 Homestead 3 3.5 10.5 N 6 2.75 13.44 N 6 Homestead 3 3.5 10.5 N 6 2.75 13.44 N 7 Tantau 3.04 3.58 10.88 N 6 2.75 13.44 N 8 Pruneridge 3 9.04 27.12 N 5 8.41 42.05 Y, external 9 Pruneridge 3 9 27 N 5 8.41 42.05 Y, external 10 Tantau Sign removed; no data 6 2.75 13.44 N Totals 174.4 280.85 A sign location map is on sheet 1 of 12. Sheets 2 through 5 are pictures of the existing signs # 1-9. Sign #10 was removed and staff has no data, but it was probably the same I-I Prepared by: Colin Jung, Senior Planner C}¡- Approved by: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner '/ Enclosures: Model Resolution Plan Set G:\Planning\DRC\staff rep\EXC-2004-O'i SR.doc 3 1-3 EXC-2004-04 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR A SIGN EXCEPTION TO ALLOW THE REPLACEMENT OF TEN EXISTING GROUND SIGNS WITH NEW GROUND SIGNS FOR AN OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL CAMPUS AT 11000 WOLFE ROAD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: EXC-2004-04 . Applicant: Alan Ford (for Hewlett Packard) Location: 11000 Wolfe Road SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Sign Exception, as described in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and compatible with the surrounding area; 1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title; 2. That the granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare; and 3. That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of the prescribed regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application no. EXC-2004-04, is here by approved; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application EXC-2004-04 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of June 2, 2004, and are incorporated by reference herein. I-~ Resolution No. Page 2 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. EXC-2004-04 June 2, 2004 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on a plan set entitled: "Location 749-43: 11000 Wolfe Road, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 12 pages, except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of June 2004, at a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Ciddy Wordell City Planner Marty Miller, Acting Chair Design Review Committee G:\Planning\ DRC\ res\ EXC-2004-04 res.doc I-~ EXC-2004-04 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 156 OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR A SIGN EXCEPTION TO ALLOW THE REPLACEMENT OF TEN EXISTING GROUND SIGNS WITH NEW GROUND SIGNS FOR AN OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL CAMPUS AT 11000 WOLFE ROAD SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: EXC-2004-04 Applicant: Alan Ford (for Hewlett Packard) Location: 11000 Wolfe Road SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Sign Exception, as described in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and compatible with the surrounding area; 1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title; 2. That the granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare; and 3. That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of the prescribed regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application no. EXC-20O4-04, is here by approved; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application EXC-2004-04 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of June 2, 2004, and are incorporated by reference herein. Resolution No. 156 Page 2 EXC-2004-04 June 2, 2004 SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on a plan set entitled: "Location 749-43: 11000 Wolfe Road, Cupertino, CA" consisting of 12 pages, except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of June 2004, at a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Commissioner Chen and Acting Chair Miller COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/ CiddyWordell Ciddy Wordell City Planner /s/ Marty Miller Marty Miller, Acting Chair Design Review Committee G:\Planning\DRC\res\EXC-2004-04 res.doc To: From: Subject: Location: Design Review Committee Gary Chao, Assistant Planner Application: ASA-20Q4-11 7308-7318 Rainbow Drive Date: June 2, 2004 Project Description: Architectural Site Approval for final architectural and site details (including 8-foot tall fencing along portions of the project perimeter) on an approved residential development (formerly Saron Gardens). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of ASA-2004-11, based on the model resolution. BACKGROUND: The project planned residential development was approved by the City Council on July 7, 2003. As part of the approval, the applicant, Centex Homes, is required to obtain final Design Review Committee approval pertaining to the following items: . Site fencing (interior and perimeter) Entry trellis features . Semi-pervious interlocking pavers . Site lighting Final landscaping plan Final exterior color combinations DISCUSSION: Site Fencing (picket fencing) 39 out of a total of 53 units will have picket fencing in the front yard area. The applicant proposes three general picket fencing types (A, B, C). Type A consists of round top pickets. Type B consists of square top pickets and type C consists of angle top pickets. With the exception of the differently shaped picket tops, the 3 picket types do not have any other features that would set them apart. As proposed, groups of units will share the same picket fence design. Staff is recommending that the design of the picket fencing be alternated between units to provide more interest and individuality to each of the units. A taller decorative post could be placed in between different picket designs between units. The applicant is aware of these suggestions and will bring revised options to the meeting for review. 07- I Perimeter Fencing The applicant is proposing to install new wood perimeter fencing along the majority of the northerly and southerly property line. Since the project site is surrounded by existing residential uses, portions of the existing 6-foot perimeter fencing are in good condition and may be preserved. The applicant will need to obtain proper consent from the adjacent property owners to remove and replace a fence located on a joint property line. Entry Trellis Features One of the attractive elements of this project is that the majority of the units will have either an arched or flat trellis feature at the entry area. There are also trellis features at various key entry points leading to walkways that serve the interior units. These trellis features not only provide more landscaping opportunities but they also provide more architectural and visual relief that will help activate the walkways and open spaces. Staff is recommending that similar trellis features be provided in front of Lots 14, 13 and 53 and in between lots 25 & 26 and 21 & 22. Also, the entry pilaster (detail 4 on sheet L6.3) should be revised to be either the arched or flat trellis features. The applicant is aware of these suggestions. Semi-pervious Interlocking Pavers One of the conditions of this project is that semi-pervious decorative paving materials be introduced in portions of the access driveway. The applicant has satisfied the condition and the driveway paving and material plans (Sheets FL 1.2, FL 1.3, L2.1, L2.2) provide examples and details of the decorative paving material. The paving sample will be provided at the meeting for review. Site Lighting All of the proposed site lightings are consistent with the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant proposes bollard lights along all interior pedestrian paths and all of the pole lights (serving the open space area and parking area) have cut-off shields to prevent any glare onto adjacent properties. Please refer to the photometric plan for details. Landscaping Plan Staff supports the final landscaping plan with the exception that all of the units adjacent to an existing single-family residence must provide sufficient privacy protection planting in order to screen any views from new second story windows. The applicant is required to work with staff to address this issue prior to issuance of building permits. Final Exterior Color Combination The original submitted conceptual color package consists of 6 different combinations. The applicant has refined the combinations and is proposing 5 final color combinations. Staff feels that this is an improvement from the original conceptual package and 2 d-;¿ supports the change. A detailed color and material board will be presented at the meeting. Prepared by: Approved by: Gary Chao, Assistant Planner Ciddy Wordell, City Planner "C« fL'Y Enclosures: Model Resolution Fencing and Paving Plan Materials Plan Lighting Plan Color and Material Board Material Board (available at the public hearing) Detail Color Samples (available at the public hearing) G:\Plalming\DRC\staff rep\ASA-2004-11 SRdoc 3 d-3 ASA-2004-11 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL FOR FINAL ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DETAILS (INCLUDING 8-FOOT TALL FENCING ALONG PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT PERIMETER) ON AN APPROVED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (FORMERLY SARON GARDENS). SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: ASA-2004-11 Jeff Jacobs - Representing Centex Homes 7308 - 7318 Rainbow Drive SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Design Review Committee has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of this chapter, the General Plan, and zoning ordinance; 3. Abrupt changes in building scale is avoided and a gradual transition related to height and bulk is achieved; and 4. Design harmony between new and existing buildings and structures is protected through the use of consistent or compatible design and color schemes 'ì 4 C" - Resolution No. Page 2 June 2, 2004 ASA-2004-1l NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the design review application is hereby approved subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application ASA-2004-11 set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee meeting of, June 2, 2004, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III. CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on a plan sets entitled: "Murano Centex Homes, Fencing Plan" dated May 13, 2004; "Murano Centex Homes, Materials Plan" dated May 7, 2004; "Murano, Lighting Plan" dated February 11, 2004; except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. PICKET FENCES The picket fence design shall alternate between units to provide more interest and individuality to each of the units. Revised plans shall be approved by Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits. 3. TRELLIS FEATURES Either arch or flat trellis features shall be provided in front of lots 14, 13 and 53 and in between lots 25 & 26 and 21 & 22. Also, the entry pilaster (detail 4 on sheet L6.3) shall be revised to be either the arched or flat trellis features. Revised plans shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits. 4. PRIVACY PROTECTION . All lots adjacent to existing single-family residence shall provide the required privacy protection planting per Rl Ordinance. All privacy screening trees shall be recorded on the property as a covenant prior to of final occupancy. 5. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90- ó)-5 Resolution No. Page 3 ASA-2004-11 June 2, 2004 day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of June 2004, at a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner Gilbert Wong, Chairperson Design Review Committee G:\Planning\DRC\res\ASA-2004-11 res.doc ;)-(¡) ASA-2004-11 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 157 OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL FOR FINAL ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DETAILS (INCLUDING 8-FOOT TALL FENCING ALONG PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT PERIMETER) ON AN APPROVED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (FORMERLY SARON GARDENS). SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: ASA-2004-11 Jeff Jacobs - Representing Centex Homes 7308 - 7318 Rainbow Drive SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Design Review Committee has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1. The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2. The proposal is consistent with the purposes of this chapter, the General Plan, and zoning ordinance; 3. Abrupt changes in building scale is avoided and a gradual transition related to height and bulk is achieved; and 4. Design harmony between new and existing buildings and structures is protected through the use of consistent or compatible design and color schemes Resolution No. 157 Page 2 ASA-2004-11 June 2, 2004 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the design review application is hereby approved subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application ASA-2004-11 set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee meeting of, June 2, 2004, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III. CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on a plan sets entitled: "Murano Centex Homes, Fencing Plan" dated May 13, 2004; "Murano Centex Homes, Materials Plan" dated May 7, 2004; "Murano, Lighting Plan" dated February 11, 2004; except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. PICKET FENCES The picket fence design shall alternate between units to provide more interest and individuality to each of the units. Type B shall consist of dog-ear picket designs. Revised plans shall be approved by Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits. 3. TRELLIS FEATURES Either arched or flat trellis features shall be provided in front lot 53, at the entry point to lots 13 & 14 and in between lots 25 & 26 and 21 & 22. Also, the entry pilaster (detail 4 on sheet L6.3) shall be revised the arched trellis features. Revised plans shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of building permits. 4. PRIVACY PROTECTION All lots adjacent to existing single-family residence shall provide the required privacy protection planting per Rl Ordinance. The all privacy-screening trees shall be recorded on the properties as a covenant and in the CC & R prior to final building approval. 5. SITE LIGHTING All light poles shall be stepped aluminum pole for side mount crooks - CASI0-534188B and the bollards lights shall be type BOR80-W per the submitted lighting details. "::. r' ð;.... '" ") "'.~ '~ "-\,'\..,.) 'r4 ,;ç~ ' '~ \- . ~\~ ~ ~..i "'" ~ ~-ç' ~", ::r- \ \ \ II) :> <Q tJ 3 () c{) L « C;,L ~ ~l /' "': <P ('f) IT -'",' "'-""""'"""""-""'~t....,..~. . , r).J :A I"\' Z . d 9t99'ON mmossv IJJnam ~d£Z;1 pooz'z.unr , .."n ~ \ \ ~ .,... ~ .J '\ oa: ;:,:, 0 ~' ~ a: .21 C C/) ;¡ \... -.....-..-...'",/ Pole Ordering Infon..dtion and Specificatioa.3 ess I eSL Stepped Aluminum Pole for Single Top Crook Pol, Gal No a,d MoO"""9 Fi",h Ordering Example: For Standard CSS / CSL Pole CSS10-534188A I DB-P I 1-2 3 1 CH x ALLOWABLE POLE EPA' Pole Catalog Numbers: For RA17 Luminaires only '!1 5.'; 0; 0 "0 - ~ 8~ ~ 0 c U " :¡¡ g ~ CD 0 0 0 0 '" '" ~ ;:: " ~ 0 co 0 ~ co " ~ ~ ~ ~ CD 0 CD ø 0 CD ~ :;; ~ § is ~g ! g g 2~ g 8 u ~ò: U u - i ¡¡¡ c <> <> <> 188' BYi 34" 20' 1'1. 32" 188' BYi 34' 2CY I%" 32" 188' 8Yi 34' 20' I%" 32" IBB' 8Y{ 34' 20' I%" 32" 34'188' BYi 34' 20' 1%' 32" '/.xI5'+3' 12' 3' 26 20 15 12 10 'I.xI5'+3' 12' 3' 21 16 12 977.9 %'xI5'+3' 12' 3' 18 13 98 7.76.3 'I.x3O' +4' 12' 3' 14 10 7.7 6.04.8 %'x30'+4' 12' 3' 946.5 47 3.5 27 - - -- Pole Catalog Number ~ " ,I" [,:_-~; cs'Jm --Y2 X2 ALLOWABLE POLE EPA' j ~ t[~~¡ ~ liSH~~:ê~ ~ ~ ~ <f) 0 -De ~ ð u~ ~ :¡¡ g ê ~ ~~3~~:;;o.:;; ~g XX1!X2Y1Y2 CD~~S ri'i 188 19513' 164' 6' 4' 188' 10Yi 46' 30' 2';.." 32' '1,,30'+4' 14' 5' 15107.7 5.94.6 18825'16.7'8.3'6' 4' 188'10Yi46'30'2'f,,32" '/.x30'+4' 14' 5' 98644.3302.2 50 30' 20' 110' 6' 4' 250' IOYi 46' 30' 2'1" 32" '1,,30'+4' 14' 5' 11 7.1 47 3.22.3 . X1 U NOTE: All allowable pole and fixture EPAs (Effective Protected Area, which Gusting Wind Equivalent ~ ;:¡ is FIXture Area x Drag Factor) are derived from the AASHTO standard (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) Responsibility lies with the specifier for correct pole selection based on local codes and standards for the Job location (See page 26). , Thickness at Y1 section, Y2 r"~~ ..." ",,*. t APPROVAL A.sA-~oo4-\\ 1 ¡ DRG &; Number ¡ ! 0 I ,I Signatur /0'= .. , 't c_- / Case anager )" I. - """""'""'"~."'""""',~-"'.,,,-,..."...,~_.~.,--,-,,=.........."~ . Wind Map Steady Wind ~ ~ 2 ----~-- Plan View Mounting Arrangements: . Mounting Cat No. EPA RA 17 RA25 A 0.8 1.5 e 'NOTE: ALLOWABLE POLE EPA for lobsite wind conditions must be equal to or greater than fixture mount EPA K'M LlGlmNG Pole Ordering Inforrllation and Specifications CAS I CAL Stepped 61uminumPoJfóL!or Side Mount Crooks .. Ordering Example: I '-;or Standard CAS I CAL Pole I I CH x 2 Pole Catalog Numbers: X2 "J Y2 Pole Step X1 .1 - Base Cover Y1 Hand Hole Mounting Arrangements: / ¿¡.'~~ ~~~;;;o;8B I ~B~P I ~ ':.,..' W~'~ (Q 1-2 3 4 l-< f-A , J ~----- Jj~ .- or RA17 Luminaires only ALLOWABLE POLE EPA" --- 00 00 '" c ~ u ~ ~ Pole Catalog Number X X1 X2 Y1 Y2 CAS1Q-534188 10' 65 35 5' 3.4' 188' 8Yi CAS12-534188 12' 8' 4' 5' 3.4' 188' 8W CAS14-534188 14' 9.3' 41 5' 3.4- 188' 8Yi CAS16-534188 16' 105 55 5' 3.4' 188' 8W CAS20-S34188195 13' 64' 5' 3.4' ,188' 8'li For RA25 Luminaires only rn Õ '" l! (j õ CD ~§6~oJ l' :1 ti ro ti ';: e ~ò: e 8 u <{ u U - ;: ùi c u u u g ~ .;¡ '" S.'" c;, 0 DO - ~ á~ ~ 8 ~ :J; 0 rn CD 26' 25' 1%' 3.2' %'x15'+3' 12' 2£' 25' I%" 3.2' ';'-x15'+3' 12' 2£' 25' 1%" 3.2' '4'xI5'+3' 12' 2£' 25' 1%' 3.2' '~'x3O'+4' 12' 26' 25' I%" 3:~ 'l.'x3O'+4' 12' " ~ 0 M 0 ~;! - - - - 0 0 0 0 '" '" 0 3' 26 20 15 ~ 10 3" 21 ,6',29.77.9 3' 18 13 987.7 6,3 3' 14 10 7.7 604,8 3' 9465473.528 00 0 CD ~ ¿ ALLOWABLE POLE EPA" '" '5", c;, Ó ~ 0 1M 0 DO - ~ ~ ~ ;! Q; ág' ~ 0 0 0 0 8 ~ """g;: :J; 0 Æ 00 ,,; E CO> I ,,; ~.c '" Õ Q> § õ áig ~u~ '" rn U - '" I 0. ti 0"'- E l! ~ (fJ 0 -::¡e ~ (j S "8 U ¿"- Pole ~oUU- Catalog CD ;: Ûi Q Numbe, X X1 X2 Y1 Y2 u u u CAL20-64188 195 13' 6.4' 6' 4' 188' 10W 37' 36' 2%, 3.2' CAL25-64188 25' 161 83' 6' 4' 188' 10W 37' 36' 2'110" 3.2' CAL25-64250 25' 161 83' 6' 4' 250' 10W 37' 36' 2'1" 3.2' CAL30-642S0 30' 20' 1CY 6' 4' 250' 10Yi 37' 36' 2'110" 3.2' CAL30-64400 30' 2ü 1ü 6' 4' 4C)J"10W 37' 36' 2'110" 3.2' - . %'x3O'+4' 14' 5' 15 10 7.7 5.94.6 '/.x30'+4' 14' 5' 986443302.2 'Itx3O'+4' 14" 5' 14 9,8 70 5.2 40 'Itx3O'+4' 14' 5' 11 7.1 4.7 3.2 2 3 '/.x3O'+4' 14' 5' 18 129.16.75.2 NOTE: All allowable pole and fixture EPAs (Effective Projected Area, which is Fixture Area x Drag Factor) are derioed from the AASHTQ standard (American Association of State Highway and Transportation OfficIals) ResponsibIlity lies with the specifier for correct pole selection based on local codes and standards for the job location (See page 26) , Thickness at Y1 section, Y2 section is 188' , Pole reinforced, to 40' above base, to 400', 'emalning Y1 section is 250', Y2 section is .188' -- Plan VIew . MountIng Cat. No EPA RA17 RA25 A 0.8 15 Gusting Wind Equivalent -- ~ Wind Map Steady Wind - g .. 8f + C 28 5,2 e B 1.6 3.0 Y 2.4 4.5 "NOTE: ALLOWABLE POLE EPA lor lobsite wind conditions must be equal to or greater than fixture mount EPA ... Proportion Guide 70 to 400 Watt / 10' to 30' Poles 32' ~ ~ 26' 24' 22' This proportion diagram is intended to help visualize and select the best Era system to satisfy aesthetic requirements Rémember, the pole height also affects performance, the higher the fixture is mounted, the greater the light throw- If poles are mounted on concrete pedestals such as In parking lots, the height ot the pedestal must be considered In selecting the pole height 20' . 18' 16' 14' RA17 CSS1Q.534188A 12' 10' 8' 6' !" 8 2' GRADE RA17 CAS16.534188A RA25 SAL30.64250B RA25 CAL25.64250B RA17 SAS20.534188B 0 0 ---- ----- --------------- ------------------ K'M UGHTING ---------------------- Mounting Configurations Crook Arms - . . .. 1W 1A 28 "t + The pole base is double welded and Includes a full 3Y 4C cast cover. CSS I CSL Single Top Crook Extruded Crook Arm 7 CAS I CAL Side Mount Crook ¡V --41~.. ~ The Iumlnalre head is bolted to the crook arm with two large stainless steel bolts . 1A The pole base is double welded and includes a full cast cover. . 8 Integrated Design Complimentary Detailing . Integration Era design approaches all detailing as Integral pieces of the whole. From the use ot its clean bell shape for the Optical Housing and exposed cooling surfaces on the Ballast Housing, to the detailing of the mounting arms and poles, Era Is complete. Combining proven mechanical features with a highly styled package without sacrificing either performance or aesthetic design IS a difficult task. Era answers this challenge, with flexibility to satisfy a wide range of architectural tastes. The tummire, mounting arms, and poles were developed with shared detailing and complimentary maling components. This approach procuces a complete design that is robust In style and mechanical integnty 1W Wall Mount CSS/CSL Single Top Crook 4 .. --' ",. CAS/CAL Side Mount Crook I~ ~I I I ... h ~ i j i ,. f i, SAS I SAL Swept Arm Mount . 8. K'M UGHTING --- DevelOped in r~sponsejoclieQts' specific ,needs, this seriesohmall landscaping luminaires offers an artractiveblend oltraditional,styring andstate-øHhe-art photometries that makes them the ideal solution to a wide 'angeol lighting needs, Designed to enhance the safety 01 an environment, these sturdy; easv- to-maintainböllards ,also meet å numberòfötherobjectivesintetms 01 esthetics, efflciencv and quality, BORBO Bollard Detal S .~~ E ~i ~~ ,~ BDRBO-W BDRBO,TCBl with TBC1 base caver " Po/---\:) ~ em '~ ~-{}--' 1- n ( \I~! ~! ~o~ ~~ u'" \... / -'" :;:'" "rL/ '" ~ \;1...___.0 "'v' Anchor bolts 5/8.12" TBC2 base caver B,C, fromA~~80;ob~:~~}(181'i~: 140 mml BORBO Lamp Guide Wattage BORBD 50 MH,me',"m 70 MH me""m 100 MH,me'",m 35 HPS me""m 50 HPS me',"m 70 HPS,me',"m 100 HPS,mo',"m The BORBO'. bollard series accommo' dates H.LD or IOcandescent lamps up tolOOW HPSballastsleaturea-40rHOC'Ilamp startIOg capacitywllha high power lactorol90% and operatewlthrn ANSI trapezOidallrmrtsMHballastsleaturea ,20fol.30C'IlampstartIOgcapacltywrth a high powerlactor 0190% All ballasts are UL recognIZed and CSA certll"d The ballasllS IOleg"led m Ihe bollard's base . BORBO Bollard BORBO Options The BDR80tradrllonal bollard cansists 01 casl.alumrnum louvers and top cover mechan"allv assembled on a one, p"ce casl.aluminum base A cast'alumlnum access door permits easy access to Ihe mlerior ollhe base The lamp is prolecled bva glassenclo. sure InSIde Ihe louvers SiI"one gaskels are used atlhe base ollhe glass enclosure to ensure weatherproohng Decorative casl' aluminum bolt covers are supplied with Ihe bollard The BDR80boliard IS ULand CSA approved Glass enclosure GL-D Dpaim glass enclosure fS fusmg lcansult Lumecl BCL' Bollard head onlv W' 6518"1168mmlwlderoundbase Variable height IBDR80,W onlvl t"mlS-I3BOmmlto4B'll22amm), 10 r'l25 mm) """ment' 8a1lO5I" "mote op 10 24" I5IOmml H15 15" 1380 mm) 10'0. he;ghl H48 48"I1220mm)m"h",ht DSH' Casl,aluminum decorativeshere (non,lumlnous) OR Duplex receptacle (120 vollS onlv} GFI Dliplex receplaclewllh ground )aull Inlerrupler (120 valIS onlvl BCH1 1 ChaIn handle BCH2 2Chainhandiesal181J' BCH2A 2 Chainhandiesat91J' BCHJ 3Chainhandiesat121J' BCH3B3Chainhandiesat91J' BCH4 4Gh,rn handles PH7 Blinon type[JilotoelectrlC cel'-- ~'.'lQr pOlnllng 01 bollard VPA Vandalprool screws TBCl DpIIO".~ decor"rve base cov"-,- TBC) OptIonal decor"rve base cover , Consuillaclorylordelaiis . BORBO Ordering Sample . L"m" """"rho cg"Io",b"""" m"""""""'oe rhem""""""CCO p""" 01 ,I'p"'","w,rhoctpc,,c"""""o Rain or shine. summer or winter, on the wateriront or inland' regardless olthe environment and weather condi- tions, these attractive boilards deliver optimal periormance. ' Featuring sturdy construction and outstanding ease of maintenanco, CANOBboliards are available. in a variety of contemporary versions providing the design flexibility to harmonize beautifully With th,ir surroundings wh.ile providing the effective lighting you seek. "'o',',or,o,', CANDB1 10112" '-----T2~ '"' 1---¡U9 mmï-l ,~ .Ë ~i 71/'"' 1191 mml CANOB Lamp Guide Wattage CANOB 50 MH,m.d"m 70 MH.m.d"m 100 MH.m.d"m 35 HPS.m.dlom 50 HPS,m",om 10 HPS. m,dlom 100 HPS,m,dlom The CANOB'. Candela bollard series accommodates H.I.D. DC mcandescenl lampsuptolOOW HPS ballastsleatuce a .40P (.40Cl lamp startmg capaCIty with a high power lactor of 90% and operate withm ANSI trapezoidal limits MH ballastsleatuce a 20P(-30Cl lamp starting capacity with ahlghpowerfactorof90%Allbaliasts are UL recognized and CSA certifIed The ballast IS integrated mthe bollard's base CANDB Base Details - ~-G-' ~~ '-! ~O~ ~~ = ',-{)-,' ~ CANDB2 ""' (30S mm'-----' '"' '-1229mml-" ~I ,~ CANDB3 ""' ,----- 1356 mml '"' ,--~ . 71/'"' 1191 mm! CANOB Bollard The Candela CANDBI bollard head conSIsts of a Fresnel.type borOSIlICate lens or a round borosdlCate prismatIC refractor, surrounded by lour rods and acast-alummumdlSk The CANOBl bollard's optical system IS prolected by four rods and two downward sloping decorative cast. alummumlouvers The CANOB3 bollard's head has lour rods, a dISk and a decorative cast. alummumsloped cover The CANOB4boliard's head has lour rods support a decorative cast. alummum sloped louver The cast.alummum luminalce base and cover lit snugly at both ends of the optical system, and Slhcnne gaskets are used to ensuce weatherproofing The bollard head assembly Ilts on an extruded alummum pole with an outSIde diameter of4 t12"' (tt4 mmland a wall thICkness 01 tlB"' (3 mml The bollard assembly IS welded to a cast.alummum base cover. This base cover IS anchnced to a cast.alummum base plate by lour screws CANDB!, CANDBl, CANOB3 and CANDB4 Candela bollards ace UL and CSA approved ~I L.....'~ I'" mml CANOB Optical Systems . . RR optics Round borosilicate refractor Symmetrical (VI Asymmetrical 11111 Asymmetrical (1111 with medium deflector RR3lD; Asymmetricalllill with large dellector RR5; RR3: RR3MO; =- FRN optics Fresnel lens FRN; Clear Fresnel lens FRNB; Blue Fresnsellens Il,m" 001 md"d,dl . Anchor bolts 3/B.t2" 8.Clrom431Bt05tI2'"{tt1tot40mml CANOB Ordering Sample ~~tl'l~ 70HPS CANO82 RR3 120 WH.TJ( FS Lvm" ""'""th""htto;obSl"""m"",,¡,,, oh",'th,m"ol."""o, plO,",S 0' ," prod",,"wltho", p"" nol""'I'" _QQMPQSITIQ @PLAN 1, 3, 4, 5, & 6a r=""""'" r APPROv. L S/\ - - -I( ;ORC ~! . ¡ .//' .., ale £. ' EIiEVATIONS ONLY :' Signature:- . /. / MURANO ;' (':Paso Manager ï L;¡ÕÖ4Ô~ :00' ,-, ... .,'" ,c.,\.JP-£BtI NO.., CALI FORN IA CENTEX HOMES 4/23/04 \NILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS INC @ 2004 _COMPOSITION @ PLAN. 1, 3, 4, 5, & 6a CO @ PLAN 2 & 6b :I."'~... .. 4/23/04 INILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS INC @ 2004 ~eOMPOSITlQ @PLAN 1, 3, 4, 5, & 6a ~-- -1/ App ¡cation N moor , : DRe (p J a ! i /. Cat /. ; i Si t c:~/~~~~' ELJEVATIONS ONLY gna ure -.."'. ~. ." ~UR' AND ;: / Case anager JI1 L-~~_.._. --/'>etf 'INO, CALIFORNIA 2004080.00 serA SI ING STUCCO VERTICAL SIDING TRIM 3 CENTEX HOMES 4/23/04 VVILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS INC @ 2004 COMPOSITION @PLAN 1, 3, 4, 5, & 6a @ PLAN 2 & 6b ."'-""" f ¡'. APPRO L ! ORC ! c ; Signature / ~ ~~ . , EJEVATIONS ONLY . URANO Cðcc ...~.n"v"r i C4e~'3JINO, CALIFORNIA 4 CNETEX HOMES 4/23/04 '1 '---- L- 'c '"""'V-'~Ô4b80.00 "" VVILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS INC @ 2004 -COMPOSITION @PLAN 1, 3, 4, 5, & 6a f"~="- . .",. - ¡ APPR í\L I CRC _J D E R TRIM r II ,;, "~:="2t)Ö4mnrocr"'""""'" . EL VATIONS ONLY ,URANO C.as8 Ma ger ¡ CUPERT;JNO, CALIFORNIA , ..".. .j"""..."'" 5 CNETEX HOMES 4/23/04 VVILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS ONC @ 2004 _COMPOSITJO @PLAN 1, 3, 4, 5, & 6a .'~,..'.'r-..,.,.,"" "'.'- R r APPRO ~L \ CRC i 'I é ' , ELiEVART,'~NNSOONLY Signature JI1 ; Cas~ an r' , 'J '--~~./ CUPER ,INO, CALIFORNIA ~'~="'200l.1')'8n~OO"'~""""'A="'-":C=' 6 CNETEX HOMES 4/23/04 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS INC @ 2004 -----------------~------ - -- ----------- ------------------ . To: From: Subject: Location: Design Review Committee Gary Chao, Assistant Planner Application: EXC-2004-07 10376 Amistad Ct. Date:June 2, 2004 Project Description: Fence exception to allow a seven-foot fence in the front yard setback area. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of EXC-2004-07, based on the model resolution. DISCUSSION: According to the City's Fence Ordinance (16.28.030), any fencing within the front yard setback shall not exceed three feet high measured from the finish grade. The intent behind this rule is so that the residential neighborhoods will not appear as a gated community. The project site is located at the corner of Voss Avenue and Amistad Court. By definition, the legal front yard is always along the narrower property frontage. In this case, Voss Avenue is the legal front yard even though functionally the Amistad Court frontage is being used as the front yard area. The applicant is requesting an exception to locate a seven-foot tall fence in the legally defined front yard area (Voss Avenue). Staff supports the exception since there is a similar existing neighborhood fencing pattern and that the exception is consistent with the intent of the Fence Ordinance. Prepared by: Approved by: Gary Chao, Assistant Planner " Ciddy Wordell, City Planner L c¿d..t¡ '¿;¿);¿diU Enclosures: Model Resolution Plan Set 3-1 EXC-2004-07 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR A FENCE EXCEPTION TO ALLOW A SEVEN-FOOT FENCE IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AREA. SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: EXC-2004-07 Ravin Checker 10376 Amistad Ct. SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Sign Exception, as described in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and compatible with the surrounding area; 1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title in that the proposed fence is consistent with surround fencing patterns and meets the intent of the ordinances since Voss Avenue frontage is really being used as a side yard; 2. That granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is materially detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare since it is consistent with the existing neighborhood pattern; and 3. That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of the prescribed regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the purpose in that the proposed fence will be setback from the property line at least 10 feet and will stay clear of the required 40 foot traffic view triangle; and 4. That the proposed exception will not result in a hazardous condition for pedestrian and vehicular traffic in that the fence will be setback from the property line at least 10 feet and will stay clear of the required 40 foot traffic view triangle; and 3-,~ Resolution No. Page 2 EXC-2004-07 June 2, 2004 5. The proposed development is otherwise consistent with the City's General Plan and with the purpose of this chapter as described in Section 16.28.010 in that it is consistent with the existing neighborhood patterns and the Amistad Ct. frontage is being used as the front yard area; and 6. The proposed development meets the requirements of the Santa Clara Fire Department and Sheriff's Department, and if security gates are proposed, that attempts are made to standardize access in that the proposed fence does not require fire and police review and no security gates are being proposed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application no. EXC-2004-07, is here by approved; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application EXC-2004-07 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of June 2, 2004, and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on the plan set as part of the staff report to the Design Review Committee dated June 2, 2004, except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. FENCING IN THE STREET SIDE YARD AREA No fencing higher than three feet tall shall be allowed in the street side yard area (first 20 feet set back from the property line along Amistad Ct.) since it is being used as a front yard. 3. BUILDING PERMITS The applicant shall obtain all the necessary building permits to construct a fence higher than six feet in height. 4. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), 3-3 Resolution No. Page 3 EXC-2004-07 June 2, 2004 has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of April 2004, at a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Ciddy Wordell, City Planner Gilbert Wong, Chairperson Design Review Committee G:\Planning\DRC\res\EXC-2004-O1 res.doc 3-4- EXC-2004-07 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 158 OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FOR A FENCE EXCEPTION TO ALLOW A SEVEN-FOOT FENCE IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK AREA. SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant: Location: EXC-2004-07 Ravin Checker 10376 Amistad Court SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Sign Exception, as described in this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee finds that the changes are beneficial and compatible with the surrounding area; 1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title in that the proposed fence is consistent with surround fencing patterns and meets the intent of the ordinances since Voss Avenue frontage is really being used as a side yard; 2. That granting of the exception will not result in a condition which is materially detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare since it is consistent with the existing neighborhood pattern; and 3. That the exception to be granted is one that will require the least modification of the prescribed regulations and the minimum variance that will accomplish the purpose in that the proposed fence will be setback from the property line at least 10 feet and will stay clear of the required 40 foot traffic view triangle; and 4. That the proposed exception will not result in a hazardous condition for pedestrian and vehicular traffic in that the fence will be setback from the property line at least 10 feet and will stay clear of the required 40 foot traffic view triangle; and Resolution No. 158 Page 2 EXC-ZOO4-07 June 2, 2004 5. The proposed development is otherwise consistent with the City's General Plan and with the purpose of this chapter as described in Section 16.28.010 in that it is consistent with the existing neighborhood patterns and the Arnistad Ct. frontage is being used as the front yard area; and 6. The proposed development meets the requirements of the Santa Clara Fire Department and Sheriff's Department, and if security gates are proposed, that attempts are made to standardize access in that the proposed fence does not require fire and police review and no security gates are being proposed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application no. EXC-2004-07, is here by approved; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application EXC-2004-07 as set forth in the Minutes of the Design Review Committee Meeting of June 2,2004, and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on the plan set as part of the staff report to the Design Review Committee dated June 2, 2004, except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. FENCING IN THE STREET SIDE YARD AREA No fencing higher than three feet tall shall be allowed in the street side yard area (first 20 feet set back from the property line along Amistad Ct.) since it is being used as a front yard. 3. BUILDING PERMITS The applicant shall obtain all the necessary building permits to construct a fence higher than six feet in height. 4. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), Resolution No. 158 Page 3 has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. EXC-2004-07 June 2, 2004 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of April 2004, at a Regular Meeting of the Design Review Committee of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Commissioner Chen and Acting Chair Miller COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: /s/ Ciddy Wordell Ciddy Wordell, City Planner /s/ Marty Miller Marty Miller, Acting Chair Design Review Committee G:\Planning\DRC\res\EXC-2004-D7 res. doc ti ! 10 3 7 C I I r+- -- '0 - 11 ( r " r ' 2 q' $~ r't I ",' r-":""- ,j -._~ ~""""'~.'m.?".- APPROVAL cRC "0'-- '"" 'l(õ~1'êYFt+r~:! -~,I $--~,--------- , 21-G , , Lrú !~ . ---)0 'J"~~ "~", ';¡" ;.,;' -< -<0' 'c,T¿¿L: f