Loading...
CC Resolution No. 16-043 Approving the Renewal and Collection of the Existing Storm Drain Fees at No Increase in Rates for Fiscal Year 2016-2017RESOLUTION N0.16-043 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING THE RENEWAL AND COLLECTION OF THE EXISTING STORM DRAIN FEES AT NO INCREASE IN RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016-2017 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cupertino enacted Municipal Code Chapter 3.36 in part to meet the City's federally mandated Storm water Pollution Prevention and Management Program and establishing the authority for imposing and charging a storm drainage service charge; and WHEREAS, a report entitled "Engineer's Report, Assessment of Fees for Storm Drainage Purposes Nonpoint Source Pollution Program (Exhibit A)," concerning the method of assessing an environmental fee to fund the City's Storm water Management Program was prepared by the Director of Public Works pursuant to Section 3.36.0SO(B) of the City's Municipal Code and filed with the City Clerk on April 14, 2016; and WHEREAS, thereport, filed with the City Clerk,was available for public inspection and review twenty (20) days prior to this public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cupertino finds and determines as follows: 1. After considering the report entitled "Engineer's Report, Assessment of Fees for Storm Drainage Purposes Nonpoint Source Pollution Program" and the testimony received at this public hearing, the City Council hereby approves the report and herein incorporates it in the resolution. 2. There is a need in the City for the continuation of a storm drainage service charge to cover the costs of the federally mandated program as heretofore described, in that properties within the city will not otherwise contribute a portion of costs toward this program and without the availability of such storm drainage service charge, the City's general fund will eventually be negatively impacted in such a manner as to jeopardize other essential services. 3. The facts and evidence presented establish that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for this fee and the impacts for which this fee shall be used, and that there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the properties, which are to be charged this fee. These relationships or nexuses are described in more detail in the above referenced report. 1 4/14116 4. The amounts of the fee for each category of property, as set forth below, are reasonable amounts as such fees are based on runoff coefficients established in the Master Storm Drain Study and below the cost recovery. 5. It is further determined that each and every parcel of land contained in said report will, and has received a benefit of flood control from the storm drainage system and that the charges imposed herein on each such parcel are in conformity with, and in fact lower than, the benefits that such parcel has received as further described in the report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Cupertino, that: 1. Charge. The storm drainage service charge shall continue to be charged to each parcel within the city to contribute to the costs of the City's federal and state requirements for Nonpoint Source Control and a Stormwater Management Program. 2. Use of Revenue. The revenue derived from said charge shall be used in connection with implementing and enforcing Chapters 3.36 of the Cupertino Municipal Code entitled "Storm Drainage Service Charge" and Chapter 9.18 entitled "Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection." 3. Schedule of Charges. follows: (a) Annual fees for each category of property will be assessed and collected as Residential premises Apartment premises Commercial/Industrial premises Unimproved/Recreational $ 12.00/parcel $144.00/acre $144.00/acre $ 36.00/acre (b) The following public properties are exempt from, and shall not be assessed the environmental fee: Cupertino Sanitary District Santa Clara County Santa Clara Valley Water District 2 4/1 4/16 Southern Pacific Transportation Company State of California The Santa Clara County Fire Department The City of Cupertino The Cupertino Union School District The Foothill-De Anza Community College District The Fremont Union High School District The Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District United States of America 4. Judicial Action to Challenge this Resolution. Any judicial action or proceeding to challenge, review, set aside, void, or annul this resolution shall be brought within 120 days from the date of its adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this 3rd day of May, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: Members of the City Council Chang, Vaidhyanathan, Paul, Sinks, Wong None None None APPROVED: ~~ Grace Schmidt/itYCkfk 3 4/14116 ENGINEER'S REPORT ASSESSMENT OF FEES FOR STORM DRAINAGE PURPOSES NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION PROGRAM A. Program Description and Purpose EXHIBIT A The purpose of this assessment is to collect fees for funding the City of Cupertino's Nonpoint Source Pollution Program mandated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Regulations by the EPA and the State of California require cities to take specific actions to eliminate or control pollutants in waters of the State. The term "nonpoint source pollution" represents a process whereby pollutants , debris, sediment and chemicals which accumulate on streets, in neighborhoods, construction sites, parking lots and other exposed surfaces are washed off by rainfall and carried away by stormwater runoff (via City drain inlets and pipes installed for flood control) into local creeks and the San Francisco Bay. Sources of these pollutants may include automobile exhaust and oil, pesticides, fertilizers, eroded soil, detergents , pet waste, paint, litter and other material carried through the City's storm drainage system-without treatment-directly to the Bay. Many of these pollutants are hazardous to aquatic and human life . The City of Cupertino has implemented several mandated and pro-active programs to mitigate this problem. Among other activities, these programs include an illegal storm drain discharge investigation and elimination complaint response program; scheduled inspections of outdoor housekeeping practices at business sites within the city; bi-weekly sweeping of residential streets and weekly sweeping of commercial streets; installation of trash capture devices and curb drain inlet screens to prevent litter from entering City's storm drainage system; inspection and cleaning of storm drain structures; public education and engagement with teachers and students, educational activities offered at City events; and a popular, unique and well-established district-wide third- grade creek education & field trip program led by the City's naturalist at McClellan Ranch and Stevens Creek. The State San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Board) approved the Municipal Regional Permit (MRP 2) on November 19, 20015 and . MRP 1 (adopted 10/14/09) and MRP 2 were issued to the City of Cupertino and 75 agencies or co-permittees which discharge storm water through municipal drainage systems to local creeks and the San Francisco Bay. The City and 14 other co-permittees are members of the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program (SCVURPPP) which work collaboratively to maintain compliance with the MRP. In addition to conducting local activities, City staff work closely with the other SCVRUPPP members to implement pollution prevention, source control , monitoring and outreach programs. The MRP includes several mandated requirements that are phased in over each five-year permit term. The SCVURPPP has increased its co-permittee membership assessments to help meet these requirements. With these and new MRP-related costs and requirements on the horizon, the City has added staff and increased the NPS budget to ensure its continued compliance. For FY 2016-2017 , 4 4/14/16 the fee will provide revenue of approximately $371 ,000 , leaving approximately $369 ,000 to be paid from the General Fund. While Proposition 218 essentially prevents the City from increasing stormwater fees, it is important that the fees in place since 1992 continue to be collected. B. Estimated Expenditures The total estimated budget to implement the required programs described above for fiscal year 2016-2017 is approximately $740,000. The breakdown of costs is estimated as follows: Countywide Program $ 286,000 SCVURPPP 1Program Assessment -Regional Permit Implementation Regional Watershed Monitoring (administered by EOA, Inc.2) State NPDES 3 Permit Fees Countywide Public Education and Municipal Staff Training CA Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Participation Annual Stormwater Fee Assessment for County Policy Development Budget Contingencies Operations and Maintenance $ 240,000 Catch Basin Cleaning Trash Capture Device Cleaning twice annually Street Sweeping (commercial areas weekly; residenti al bi-weekly) On-call Emergency Spill and Discharge Response Staff to Implement City's Mandated Litter Reduction Plan Implementation of PCB reduction requirements City Public Engagement and Education Awareness Public Outreach Materials & Events Third-Grade Creek Education for Local Schools $ Support High School Students' Watershed and Creek Education 50 ,000 De Anza College Partnership and Community Environmental Education Creek Cleanup& Watershed Monitoring Events Green Infrastructure education and outreach Staff to Conduct Public Education, Training and Outreach Local Programs $ 164 ,000 Ordinance Revision & CEQA Review Development, Administration, Tracking and Evaluation of Mandated Programs Database Administration Illegal Discharge Complaint Investigation and Enforcement 1SCVURPPP : Th e Santa Cl ara Valley Ur ban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program is a coll a borati ve of 15 muni c ip a liti es and agenci es in Santa C lara Coun ty of whi ch C upertin o is a memb er and co -pennittee. 2 EOA, In c. is th e environmenta l engin eerin g and regul atory co nsu lting firm th at manages th e Sa nta C lara Vall ey Urban Run off Po lluti o n Preventi on Program for th e co-p ermittees www.eoa inc .com 3NP DES: Na ti onal Po llutan t Di scharge Elim in ati o n Sys te m 5 4/1 4/1 6 Industrial/Commercial Discharger Inspection Program Construction Site Inspection Program Verification of Treatment Measure Maintenance on Private Property Low Impact Development (LID) Review and Tracking Litter Reduction Education and Enforcement Staff to Implement Enforcement and Track Compliance TOTAL COST TO MAINTAIN CITY'S COMPLIANCE $ 740,000 C. Revenue and Assessment Revenues generated to fund this program are based on a factor calculated from the City's Master Storm Drain Study runoff coefficients and average area of impervious surface per acre based on type ofland-use development. The factor for each category is based on a comparison to an average residential parcel assigned a factor of one. The following table represents the approximate revenue stream for different categories of development. Development Category Residential Commercial/Industrial/ Apartments Unimproved/Recreational Factor 1 12 3 No. Parcels Annual Revenue or Acre Cost/Unit Generated 15,676 Pcls $ 12.00 $ 188,112 1,053.26 Ac $ 144.00 $ *151,667 871.39Ac $ 36.00 $ *31,370 TOTAL$ 371,149 Each parcel has been identified and a fee established in a separate report entitled PARCEL ASSESSMENT REPORT.* Note: Revenue reflects actual amount collected on parcels. Acreage is affected by rounding. Timm Borden Director of Public Works 6 4/14116